UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC. 20549

FORM 20-F
 
(Mark One)
oREGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR 
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20122014
OR 
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from _________________to___________________
OR 
oSHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
Date of event requiring this shell company report  


Commission file number000-29106
  

Knightsbridge TankersGolden Ocean Group Limited
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
 
(Translation of Registrant's name into English)
 
Bermuda
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
Par-la-Ville Place, 14 Par-la-Ville Road, Hamilton, HM 08, Bermuda
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
Georgina Sousa, Telephone: (1) 441 295 6935, Facsimile: (1) 441 295 3494,
Par-la-Ville Place, 14 Par-la-Ville Road, Hamilton, HM 08, Bermuda
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act
Title of each className of each exchange on which registered
Common  Shares, Par Value $0.01 Per ShareNASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
None
(Title of Class)





Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
Common Shares, Par Value $0.01 Per Share
(Title of Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

24,437,00080,121,550 Common Shares, Par Value $0.01 Per Share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o
No x

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o
No x

Note – Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x
No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes  x
No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer  o
Accelerated filer  x
Non-accelerated filer  o

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP x
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board o
Other o

If "Other" has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:
Item 17 o
Item 18 o

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o
No x





INDEX TO REPORT ON FORM 20-F


  PAGE
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  





CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Matters discussed in this report and the documents incorporated by reference may constitute forward-looking statements. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides safe harbor protections for forward-looking statements, which include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements, which are other than statements of historical facts.
Knightsbridge TankersGolden Ocean Group Limited and its subsidiaries, or the Company, desires to take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this cautionary statement in connection with this safe harbor legislation.therewith. This reportdocument and any other written or oral statements made by usGolden Ocean Group Limited or on ourits behalf may include forward-looking statements, which reflect ourits current views with respect to future events and financial performance. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides safe harbor protections for forward-looking statements in order to encourage companies to provide prospective information about their business. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements, which are other than statements of historical facts. This document includes assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions and beliefs about future events. These statements are intended as “forward-looking statements.” We caution that assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions and beliefs about future events may and often do vary from actual results and the differences can be material. When used in this document, the words "believe," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "forecast," "project," "plan," "potential," "will," "may," "should," "expect"“believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “targets,” “projects,” “likely,” “will,” “would,” “could” and similar expressions or phrases may identify forward-looking statements.

The forward-lookingAll statements in this reportdocument that are based upon various assumptions, including, without limitation, management's examinationnot statements of historical operating trends, data contained in our records and data available from third parties. Although we believe that these assumptions were reasonable when made, because these assumptionsfact are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies which are difficult or impossible to predict and are beyond our control, we cannot assure you that we will achieve or accomplish these expectations, beliefs or projections. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
In addition to these important factors and matters discussed elsewhere herein and in the documents incorporated by reference herein, important factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-lookingstatements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, such matters as:

our future operating or financial results;
statements about planned, pending or recent acquisitions, business strategy and expected capital spending or operating expenses, including drydocking, surveys, upgrades and insurance costs;
the strength of world economies, economies;
stability of Europe and the Euro;
fluctuations in currencies and interest rates and foreign exchange rates;
general dry bulk shipping market conditions, including fluctuations in charter hire rates and vessel values, values;
changes in demand in the tanker and dry bulk markets, shipping industry, including the market for our vessels;
changes in world wide oil production and consumption and storage, changes in the Company'sour operating expenses, including bunker prices, drydockingdry docking and insurance costs, the market for the Company's vessels, availability of financing and refinancing, costs;
changes in governmental rules and regulations or actions taken by regulatory authorities, authorities;
potential liability from pending or future litigation, litigation;
general domestic and international political conditions, conditions;
potential disruption of shipping routes due to accidents or political eventsevents;
Our ability to procure or acts by terrorists,have access to financing, our liquidity and other important factors described from timethe adequacy of cash flows for our operations;
Our continued borrowing availability under our debt agreements and compliance with the covenants contained therein;
Our ability to timesuccessfully employ our existing and newbuilding dry bulk vessels;
Our ability to fund future capital expenditures and investments in the reports filed byconstruction, acquisition and refurbishment of our vessels (including the Companyamount and nature thereof and the timing of completion thereof, the delivery and commencement of operations dates, expected downtime and lost revenue);
risks associated with the Securities and Exchange Commission,vessel construction;
potential exposure or loss from investment in derivative instruments;
potential conflicts of interest involving members of our board of directors, or the Commission.Board, and senior management;
Our expectations regarding the availability of vessel acquisitions and our ability to complete acquisition transactions planned;
vessel breakdowns and instances of off-hire; and
statements about dry bulk shipping market trends, charter rates and factors affecting supply and demand.

We caution readers of this report not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates.  These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of our future performance, and actual results and future developments may vary materially from those projected in the forward looking statements. Please see our Risk Factors in Item 3 of this report for a more complete discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties.
 

i



PART I

ITEM 1.  IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.  OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not applicable.

ITEM 3.  KEY INFORMATION

On October 7, 2014, Knightsbridge Shipping Limited, or Knightsbridge, and Golden Ocean Group Limited, or the Former Golden Ocean, entered into an agreement and plan of merger, or the Merger, pursuant to which the two companies agreed to merge, with Knightsbridge serving as the surviving legal entity. The Merger was completed on March 31, 2015, and the name of Knightsbridge was changed to Golden Ocean Group Limited. See "Item 4A-Information on the Company" for more information.

Throughout this report, unless the "Company," "we," "us"context otherwise requires, Golden Ocean, “we,” “us,” and "our" all“our” refer to Knightsbridge TankersGolden Ocean Group Limited and its subsidiaries. We usesubsidiaries as of the date of this annual report, and Knightsbridge refers to Knightsbridge Shipping Limited and its subsidiaries prior to completion of the Merger.

The term deadweight ton, or dwt, is used in describing the size of vessels. Dwt, expressed in metric tons, each of which is equivalent to 1,000 kilograms, refers to the maximum weight of cargo and supplies that a vessel can carry. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to "USD," "US$" and "$" in this report are to, and amounts are presented in, U.S. dollars.

A.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected statement of operations data of the CompanyKnightsbridge with respect to the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, and the selected balance sheet data of the Company with respect to the fiscal years endedKnightsbridge as of December 31, 20122014 and 2011, respectively,2013, have been derived from the Company'sKnightsbridge's consolidated financial statements included herein and should be read in conjunction with such statements and the notes thereto. The selected statement of operations data with respect to the fiscal years ended December 31, 20092011 and 2008,2010 and the selected balance sheet data with respect to the fiscal years endedas of December 31, 2010, 20092012, 2011 and 20082010 have been derived from consolidated financial statements of the CompanyKnightsbridge not included herein. The following table should also be read in conjunction with Item 5. "Operating"Item 5-Operating and Financial Review and Prospects" and the Company'sKnightsbridge's consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included herein. The Company'sKnightsbridge's accounts are maintained in U.S. dollars.


1



Fiscal year ended December 31,Fiscal year ended December 31,
2012
 2011
 2010
 2009
 2008
2014
 2013
 2012
 2011
 2010
(in thousands of $, except shares, per share data and ratios)
Statement of Operations Data:                  
Total operating revenues37,315
 55,497
 40,825
 8,480
 
96,715
 37,546
 37,315
 55,497
 40,825
Total operating expenses27,307
 24,457
 17,267
 4,974
 1,538
77,229
 30,722
 27,307
 24,457
 17,267
Net operating income (loss)10,008
 31,040
 23,558
 3,506
 (1,538)
Net operating income19,486
 6,824
 10,008
 31,040
 23,558
Net income from continuing operations5,882
 27,058
 20,145
 2,576
 625
16,253
 3,530
 5,882
 27,058
 20,145
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations (1)(59,311) 5,594
 18,412
 19,104
 47,429
(258) (7,433) (59,311) 5,594
 18,412
Net (loss) income(53,429) 32,652
 38,557
 21,680
 48,054
Net income (loss)15,995
 (3,903) (53,429) 32,652
 38,557
Earnings per share from continuing operations: basic0.24
 1.11
 1.05
 0.15
 0.04
0.31
 0.14
 0.24
 1.11
 1.05
Earnings per share from continuing operations: diluted0.24
 1.10
 1.05
 0.15
 0.04
0.31
 0.14
 0.24
 1.10
 1.05
(Loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations: basic(2.43) 0.23
 0.97
 1.12
 2.77
(Loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations : diluted(2.41) 0.23
 0.97
 1.12
 2.77
(Loss) earnings per share: basic(2.19) 1.34
 2.02
 1.27
 2.81
(Loss) earnings per share: diluted(2.17) 1.33
 2.02
 1.27
 2.81
Loss per share from discontinued operations: basic
 (0.29) (2.43) 0.23
 0.97
Loss per share from discontinued operations: diluted
 (0.29) (2.41) 0.23
 0.97
Earnings (loss) per share: basic0.30
 (0.15) (2.19) 1.34
 2.02
Earnings (loss) per share: diluted0.30
 (0.15) (2.17) 1.33
 2.02
Cash distributions per share declared1.20
 2.00
 1.70
 0.25
 2.75
0.63
 0.70
 1.20
 2.00
 1.70
                  
Balance Sheet Data (at end of year):       
  
         
Cash and cash equivalents79,259
 46,848
 56,771
 7,964
 77,998
42,221
 98,250
 79,259
 46,848
 56,771
Restricted cash15,000
 15,000
 15,000
 10,000
 10,000
18,923
 15,000
 15,000
 15,000
 15,000
Newbuildings
 
 
 
 51,305
323,340
 26,706
 
 
 
Vessels, net273,826
 436,273
 459,032
 344,399
 187,360
852,665
 262,747
 273,826
 436,273
 459,032
Total assets397,420
 521,219
 541,953
 374,946
 331,685
1,262,740
 409,858
 397,420
 521,219
 541,953
Current portion of long-term debt4,700
 3,600
 3,600
 13,960
 42,560
19,812
 
 4,700
 3,600
 3,600
Long-term debt106,978
 150,140
 153,740
 106,520
 60,480
343,688
 95,000
 106,978
 150,140
 153,740
Share capital244
 244
 244
 171
 171
801
 305
 244
 244
 244
Total equity277,694
 359,932
 375,901
 239,710
 222,305
884,273
 307,441
 277,694
 359,932
 375,901
Common shares outstanding24,437,000
 24,425,699
 24,425,699
 17,100,000
 17,100,000
80,121,550
 30,472,061
 24,437,000
 24,425,699
 24,425,699
Other Financial Data:                  
Equity to assets ratio (percentage) (2)69.9% 69.1% 69.4% 63.9% 67.0%70.0% 75.0% 69.9% 69.1% 69.4%
Debt to equity ratio (3)0.4
 0.4
 0.4
 0.5
 0.5
0.4
 0.3
 0.4
 0.4
 0.4
Price earnings ratio (4)(2.4) 10.2
 11.0
 10.4
 5.2
(61.3) (61.3) (2.4) 10.2
 11.0
Time charter equivalent revenue (5)32,992
 53,477
 39,674
 8,330
 
62,760
 30,737
 32,992
 53,477
 39,674

(1)The CompanyKnightsbridge classified its only remaining VLCC as 'held for sale' as of December 31, 2012 and thethis vessel was sold during 2013. The operations of the Company'sKnightsbridge's VLCCs have been recorded as discontinued operations in 2012.all periods shown above.
(2)Equity to assets ratio is calculated as total equity divided by total assets.
(3)Debt to equity ratio is calculated as total interest bearing current and long-term liabilities divided by total equity.
(4)Price earnings ratio is calculated using the year end share price divided by basic (loss) earnings per share.
(5)A reconciliation of time charter equivalent revenues to total operating revenues as reflected in the consolidated statements of operation is as follows:
 

2



2012
 2011
 2010
 2009
 2008
2014
 2013
 2012
 2011
 2010
(in thousands of $)                  
Total operating revenues37,315
 55,497
 40,825
 8,480
 
96,715
 37,546
 37,315
 55,497
 40,825
Less: Voyage expense(4,323) (2,020) (1,151) (150) 
(33,955) (6,809) (4,323) (2,020) (1,151)
Time charter equivalent revenue32,992
 53,477
 39,674
 8,330
 
62,760
 30,737
 32,992
 53,477
 39,674

Consistent with general practice in the shipping industry, the Company useswe use time charter equivalent revenues, which represents operating revenues less voyage expenses, as a measure to compare revenue generated from a voyage charter to revenue generated from a time charter. Time charter equivalent revenues, a non-GAAP measure, provides additional meaningful information in conjunction with operating revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, because it assists Company management in making decisions regarding the deployment and use of its vessels and in evaluating their financial performance.

B.  CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS

Not applicable.

C.  REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable.

D. RISK FACTORS

The following summarizes the risks that may materially affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
Risks Related to Our Industry
 
Dry bulk

The continued downturn in the dry bulk carrier charter market has had and may continue to have an adverse effect on our earnings.
The dramatic downturn in the dry bulk charter market, from which we plan to derive our revenues, has severely affected the dry bulk shipping industry. The Baltic Dry Index, or BDI, an index published by The Baltic Exchange of shipping rates for 20 key dry bulk routes, fell 94% from a peak of 11,793 in May 2008 to a low of 663 in December 2008 and has remained volatile since, reaching a low of 772 and a high of 4,661 during 2009, a low of 1,700 and a high of 4,209 during 2010, and continued to decline in 2011 and 2012, reaching lows of 1,043 and 647, respectively. The high and low in 2013 were 2,337 and 698, respectively, and the high and low for 2014 were 2,113 and 723, respectively. The average BDI for 2014 was down by six percent compared to the previous year, making 2014 the second worst year since 1999, and the BDI has reached an all time low of 509 in February 2015.
This downturn in dry bulk charter rates and their volatility has had a number of adverse consequences for dry bulk shipping, including, among other things:

an absence of financing for vessels;
extremely low charter rates, particularly for vessels employed in the spot market;
widespread loan covenant defaults in the dry bulk shipping industry; and
declaration of bankruptcy by some operators and ship owners as well as charterers.

The occurrence of one or more of these events could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay cash distributions. There can be no assurance that the dry bulk charter market will recover and the market could continue to decline further.
Dry bulk carrier values have also declined both as a result of a slowdown in the availability of global credit and the significant deterioration in charter rates. Charter rates and vessel values have been affected in part by the lack of availability of credit to finance both vessel purchases and purchases of commodities carried by sea, and the excess supply of iron ore in China, Brazil and Australia, which resulted in falling iron ore prices and increased stockpiles in Chinese, Brazilian and Australian ports. There can be no assurance as to how long spot charter rates and vessel values will remain at their currently low levels. Charter rates may remain at low levels for some time which will adversely affect our revenue and profitability.

3



In addition, because the market value of our vessels may fluctuate significantly, we may incur losses when we sell vessels, which may adversely affect our earnings. If we sell vessels at a time when vessel prices have fallen and before we have recorded an impairment adjustment to our financial statements, the sale may be at less than the vessel's carrying amount in our financial statements, resulting in a loss and a reduction in earnings.

Charter hire rates for dry bulk vessels may decrease in the future, which may adversely affect our earnings.

The dry bulk shipping industry is cyclical with attendant volatility in charter hire rates and profitability. The degree of charter hire rate volatility among different types of dry bulk vessels has varied widely, and charter hire rates for dry bulk vessels have declined significantly from historically high levels. Fluctuations in charter rates result from changes in the supply and demand for vessel capacity and changes in the supply and demand for the major commodities carried by water internationally. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully charter our vessels in the future or renew existing charters at rates sufficient to allow us to meet our obligations. The supply of and demand for shipping capacity strongly influence charter rates. Because the factors affecting the supply and demand for vessels are outside of our control and are unpredictable, the nature, timing, direction and degree of changes in industry conditions are also unpredictable.

Factors that influence demand for vessel capacity include:

supply and demand for energy resources, commodities, semi-finished and finished consumer and industrial products;
changes in the exploration or production of energy resources, commodities, semi-finished and finished consumer and industrial products;
the location of regional and global exploration, production and manufacturing facilities;
the location of consuming regions for energy resources, commodities, semi-finished and finished consumer and industrial products;
the globalization of production and manufacturing;
global and regional economic and political conditions, including armed conflicts and terrorist activities, embargoes and strikes;
developments in international trade;
changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns, including the distance cargo is transported by sea;
environmental and other regulatory developments;
currency exchange rates, and
weather.


3



Factors that influence the supply of vessel capacity include:

number of newbuilding deliveries;
port and canal congestion;
scrapping of older vessels;
slow steaming;
vessel casualties; and
number of vessels that are out of service.

Demand for our dry bulk vessels is dependent upon economic growth in the world's economies, seasonal and regional changes in demand, changes in the capacity of the global dry bulk fleet and the sources and supply of dry bulk cargo transported by sea. Given the large number of new dry bulk carriers currently on order with shipyards, the capacity of the global dry bulk carrier fleet seems likely to increase and economic growth may not resume in areas that have experienced a recession or continue in other areas. Adverse economic, political, social or other developments could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.
 
The continued downturn in the dry bulk carrier charter market has had and may continue to have an adverse effect on our earnings.
The abrupt and dramatic downturn in the dry bulk charter market, from which we derive our revenues, has severely affected the dry bulk shipping industry. The Baltic Dry Index, an index published by The Baltic Exchange of shipping rates for 20 key dry bulk routes, fell 94% from a peak of 11,793 in May 2008 to a low of 663 in December 2008 and remained volatile since, reaching a low of 772 and a high of 4,661 during 2009, a low of 1,700 and a high of 4,209 during 2010, and has continued to decline, reaching lows of 1,043 in 2011, 647 in 2012 and 698 in the first quarter of 2013.
This downturn in dry bulk charter rates and their volatility has had a number of adverse consequences for dry bulk shipping, including, among other things:

an absence of financing for vessels;
no active second-hand market for the sale of vessels;
extremely low charter rates, particularly for vessels employed in the spot market;
widespread loan covenant defaults in the dry bulk shipping industry; and
declaration of bankruptcy by some operators and ship owners as well as charterers.

The occurrence of one or more of these events could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay cash distributions. There can be no assurance that the dry bulk charter market will recover and the market could continue to decline further.
Dry bulk carrier values have also declined both as a result of a slowdown in the availability of global credit and the significant deterioration in charter rates. Charter rates and vessel values have been affected in part by the lack of availability of credit to finance both vessel purchases and purchases of commodities carried by sea, resulting in a decline in cargo shipments, and the excess supply of iron ore in China, which resulted in falling iron ore prices and increased stockpiles in Chinese ports. There can be no assurance as to how long spot charter rates and vessel values will remain at their currently low levels. Charter rates may remain at low levels for some time which will adversely affect our revenue and profitability.
In addition, because the market value of our vessels may fluctuate significantly, we may incur losses when we sell vessels, which may adversely affect our earnings. If we sell vessels at a time when vessel prices have fallen and before we have recorded an impairment adjustment to our financial statements, the sale may be at less than the vessel's carrying amount in our financial statements, resulting in a loss and a reduction in earnings.
An oversupplyover-supply of dry bulk carrier capacity may leadprolong or further depress the current low charter rates, which may limit our ability to reductions in charter hire rates and profitability.operate our dry bulk carriers profitably.

The market supply of dry bulk carriersvessels, which has increased significantly since the beginning of 2008, has outpaced vessel demand growth over the past few years, thereby causing downward pressure on charter rates. As of March 31, 2015, newbuilding orders have been increasing as a resultplaced for approximately19% of the deliveryexisting fleet capacity. Until the new supply of numerous newbuilding orders overvessels is fully absorbed by the last few years. Approximately 220 Capesize vessels and 375 Panamax vessels were delivered during 2012 and approximately 90 Capesize vessels and 135 Panamax vessels were sold for scrap during 2012. An oversupply of dry bulk carrier capacitymarket, charter rates may resultcontinue to be under pressure in a reduction of charter hire rates, as evidenced by historically low rates in December 2008. If such dry bulk carrier capacity increase continues, we may only be ablethe near to re-charter our vessels at reduced or unprofitable rates, or we may not be able to re-charter these vessels at all. The occurrence of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay cash distributions.medium term.

Shipping Generally

4



Tankers
If the tanker industry, which historically has been cyclical and volatile, continues to be depressed or declines further in the future, our revenues, earnings and available cash flow may be adversely affected.
Historically, the tanker industry has been highly cyclical, with volatility in profitability, charter rates and asset values resulting from changes in the supply of, and demand for, tanker capacity. After reaching highs during the summer of 2008, charter rates for crude oil carriers fell dramatically during the global financial crisis and current rates continue to remain at relatively low levels compared to the rates achieved in the years preceding the global financial crisis. Fluctuations in charter rates and tanker values result from changes in the supply of and demand for tanker capacity and changes in the supply of and demand for oil and oil products. These factors may adversely affect the rates payable and the amounts we receive in respect of our vessels. Our ability to re-charter our vessels on the expiration or termination of their current charters and the charter rates payable under any renewal or replacement charters will depend upon, among other things, economic conditions in the tanker market and we cannot guarantee that any renewal or replacement charters we enter into will be sufficient to allow us to operate our vessels profitably.

The factors that influence demand for tanker capacity include:

supply and demand for oil and oil products;
global and regional economic and political conditions, including developments in international trade, national oil reserves policies, fluctuations in industrial and agricultural production and armed conflicts;
regional availability of refining capacity;
environmental and other legal and regulatory developments;
the distance oil and oil products are to be moved by sea;
changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns, including changes in the distances over which tanker cargoes are transported by sea;
increases in the production of oil in areas linked by pipelines to consuming areas, the extension of existing, or the development of new, pipeline systems in markets we may serve, or the conversion of existing non-oil pipelines to oil pipelines in those markets;
currency exchange rates;
weather and acts of God and natural disasters;
competition from alternative sources of energy and from other shipping companies and other modes of transport;
international sanctions, embargoes, import and export restrictions, nationalizations, piracy and wars; and
regulatory changes including regulations adopted by supranational authorities and/or industry bodies, such as safety and environmental regulations and requirements by major oil companies.

The factors that influence the supply of tanker capacity include:

current and expected purchase orders for tankers;
the number of tanker newbuilding deliveries;
any potential delays in the delivery of newbuilding vessels and/or cancellations of newbuilding orders;
the scrapping rate of older tankers;
the successful implementation of the phase-out of single-hull tankers;
technological advances in tanker design and capacity;
tanker freight rates, which are affected by factors that may effect the rate of newbuilding, swapping and laying up of tankers;
port and canal congestion;
price of steel and vessel equipment;
conversion of tankers to other uses or conversion of other vessels to tankers;
the number of tankers that are out of service; and
changes in environmental and other regulations that may limit the useful lives of tankers.

The factors affecting the supply and demand for tankers have been volatile and are outside of our control, and the nature, timing and degree of changes in industry conditions are unpredictable, including those discussed above. The current global economic downturn may reduce demand for transportation of oil over longer distances and increase supply of tankers to carry that oil, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to pay cash distributions.
In addition, the downturn in the tanker industry has had an adverse impact on many tanker companies, including Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc., a company not affiliated with us, which has recently filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11

5



of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In addition, other companies in the industry, including Frontline Ltd. (NYSE: FRO), or Frontline, the parent company of our General Manager, have significantly restructured their operations in response to the financial downturn. If these trends continue, in order for us to remain viable, we may not be able to continue to pay cash distributions and we may have to sell vessels in our fleet and/or seek to raise additional capital in the equity markets and/or assume additional indebtedness.

The international tanker industry has experienced volatile charter rates and vessel values and there can be no assurance that these charter rates and vessel values will return to their previous levels.
Charter rates in the tanker industry are volatile. We anticipate that future demand for our vessels, and in turn our future charter rates, will be dependent upon economic growth in the world's economies, as well as seasonal and regional changes in demand and changes in the capacity of the world's fleet. We believe that the relatively high charter rates that were paid prior to 2008 were the result of economic growth in the world economy that exceeded growth in global vessel capacity. Since 2008, charter rates have declined significantly and there can be no assurance that economic growth will not stagnate or decline leading to a further decrease in vessel values and charter rates. A further decline in vessel values and charter rates would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay cash distributions.
Any decrease in shipments of crude oil may adversely affect our financial performance.
The demand for our oil tankers derives primarily from demand for Arabian Gulf, West African, North Sea and Caribbean crude oil, which, in turn, primarily depends on the economies of the world's industrial countries and competition from alternative energy sources. A wide range of economic, social and other factors can significantly affect the strength of the world's industrial economies and their demand for crude oil from the mentioned geographical areas. Any decrease in shipments of crude oil from the above mentioned geographical areas would have a material adverse effect on our financial performance. Among the factors which could lead to such a decrease are:

increased crude oil production from other areas;
increased refining capacity in the Arabian Gulf or West Africa;
increased use of existing and future crude oil pipelines in the Arabian Gulf or West Africa;
a decision by Arabian Gulf or West African oil-producing nations to increase their crude oil prices or to further decrease or limit their crude oil production;
armed conflict in the Arabian Gulf and West Africa and political or other factors; and
the development and the relative costs of nuclear power, natural gas, coal and other alternative sources of energy.

In addition, continuing weak economic conditions affecting the United States and world economies may result in reduced consumption of oil products and a decreased demand for our vessels and lower charter rates, which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and our ability to pay cash distributions.

An over-supply of tanker capacity may lead to reductions in charter rates, vessel values and profitability.
In recent years, shipyards have produced a large number of new tankers. If the capacity of new vessels delivered exceeds the capacity of tankers being scrapped and converted to non-trading tankers, tanker capacity will increase. If the supply of tanker capacity increases and the demand for tanker capacity does not increase correspondingly, charter rates could materially decline. A reduction in charter rates and the value of our vessels may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or our ability to pay cash distributions.

Shipping Generally
 
Risks involved with operating ocean-going vessels could affect our business and reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
 
The operation of an ocean-going vessel carries inherent risks. These risks include the possibility of:
 
a marine disaster,
terrorism,
environmental accidents,
cargo and property losses and damage, and
business interruptions caused by mechanical failure, human error, war, terrorism, piracy, political action in various countries, labor strikes, or adverse weather conditions.
 

6



Any of these circumstances or events could increase our costs or lower our revenues. The involvement of our vessels in an oil spill or other environmental disaster may harm our reputation as a safe and reliable dry bulk operator.
 
IfVolatile economic conditions throughout the world do not improve, it willcould have an adverse impact on our operations and financial results.
 
Negative trends in the global economy that emerged in 2008 continue to adversely affect global economic conditions. In addition, theThe world economy continues to face a number of challenges, including the recent turmoil and hostilities in the Middle East, North Africa and other geographic areas and countries and continuing economic weakness in the U.S. and the European Union. There has historically been a strong link between the development of the world economy and demand for energy, including oil and gas. An extended period of deterioration in the outlook for the world economy could reduce the overall demand for oil and gas and for our services. We cannot predict how long the currentWhile market conditions will last. However, recenthave improved, continued adverse and developing economic and governmental factors, together with the concurrent declinevolatility in charter rates and vessel values, may have had a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows have caused the price of our common shares to decline and could cause the price of our commonordinary shares to decline further.decline.
 
The economies of the United States, the European Union and other parts of the world continuecontinues to experience relatively slow growth or remain in recession and exhibit weak economic trends. TheOver the past six years, the credit markets in the United States and Europe have experienced significant contraction, deleveragingde-leveraging and reduced liquidity, and the U.S. federal government and state governments and European authorities continueliquidity. While credit conditions are beginning to implement a broad variety of governmental action and/or new regulation of thestabilize, global financial markets. Global financial markets and economic conditions have been, and continue to be, severely disrupted and volatile. Since 2008, lending by financial institutions worldwide remainremains at lowlower levels compared to the period proceedingpreceding 2008.

The continued economic slowdown in the Asia Pacific region, especially in Japan and China, may exacerbate the effect on us of the recent slowdown in the rest of the world. Chinese dry bulk imports have accounted for between 50% and 80% of global dry bulk transportation growth annually over the last 12 years. Before the global economic financial crisis that began in 2008, China had one of the world's fastest growing economies in terms of gross domestic product, or GDP, which had a significant impact on shipping demand. The growth rate of China's GDP decreased to approximately 7.8% for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared2014, is estimated to approximately 9.3%be around 7.4%, down from a growth rate of 7.7% for the year ended December 31, 2011,2013, and continues to remainremaining below pre-2008 levels. The lack of visibility and transparency from Chinese policy makers (the big shortfall of coal imports to the country in 2014, for example) is also adding risk. It appears that China has imposed measuresis willing to restrain lending,take important steps to curb pollution, which may further contribute toin turn could have a slowdown in its economic growth.negative impact for the dry bulk sector. China and other countries in the Asia Pacific region may continue to experience slowed or even negative economic growth in the future. Moreover, the current economic slowdown in the economies of the United States, the European Union and other Asian countries may further adversely affect economic growth in China and elsewhere. Our financial condition and results of operations, as well as our future prospects, would likely be impeded by a continuing or worsening economic downturn in any of these countries.

The instability of the euro or the inability of countries to refinance their debts could have a material adverse effect on our revenue, profitability and financial position.
 
As a result of the credit crisis in Europe, in particular in Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Ireland, Portugal and Spain, the European Commission created the European Financial Stability Facility, or the EFSF, and the European Financial Stability Mechanism, or the EFSM, to provide funding to Eurozone countries in financial difficulties that seek such support. In March 2011,September 2012, the European Council agreed on the need for Eurozone countries to establishestablished a permanent stability mechanism, the European Stability Mechanism, or the ESM, which was established on September 27, 2012 to assume the role of the EFSF and the EFSM in providing external financial assistance to Eurozone countries. Despite these measures, concerns persist regarding the debt burden of certain Eurozone countries and their ability to meet future financial obligations and the overall stability of the euro. An extended period ofobligations. Potential adverse developmentdevelopments in the outlook for European countries could reduce the overall demand for dry bulk cargoes and for our services. These potential developments, or marketMarket perceptions concerning these and related issues, could affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flow.
 
The current state of the global financial markets and current economic conditions may adversely impact our ability to obtain financing on acceptable terms and otherwise negatively impact our business.
 
Global financial markets and economic conditions have been, and continue to be, volatile. Recently, operating businesses in the global economy have faced tightening credit, weakening demand for goods and services, deteriorating international liquidity

5



conditions and declining markets. There has been a general decline in the willingness by banks and other financial institutions to extend credit, particularly in the shipping industry, due to the historically volatile asset values of vessels. As the shipping industry is highly dependent on the availability of credit to finance and expand operations, it has been negatively affected by this decline.
 
Also, as a result of concerns about the stability of financial markets generally and the solvency of counterparties specifically, the cost of obtaining money from the credit markets has increased as many lenders have increased interest rates, enacted tighter lending

7



standards, refused to refinance existing debt at all or on terms similar to current debt and reduced, and in some cases ceased, to provide funding to borrowers. Due to these factors, we cannot be certain that financing will be available if needed and to the extent required, on acceptable terms. If financing is not available when needed, or is available only on unfavorable terms, we may be unable to meet our obligations as they come due or we may be unable to enhance our existing business, complete additional vessel acquisitions or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities as they arise.
 
In addition, at times, lower demand for dry bulk cargoes as well as diminished trade credit available for the delivery of such dry bulk cargoes have led to decreased demand for dry bulk vessels, creating downward pressure on charter rates.
 
If the current global economic environment persists or worsens, we may be negatively affected in the following ways:

we may not be able to employ our vessels at charter rates as favorable to us as historical rates or at all or operate our vessels profitably; and
the market value of our vessels could decrease, which may cause us to recognize losses if any of our vessels are sold or if their values are impaired.

The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay cash distributions.
Acts of piracy on ocean-going vessels could adversely affect our business.
Acts of piracy have historically affected ocean-going vessels trading in regions of the world such as the South China Sea, the Indian Ocean and in the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia. Although the frequency of sea piracy worldwide decreased during 2012 to its lowest level since 2009, sea piracy incidents continue to occur, particularly in the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia and increasingly in the Gulf of Guinea, with dry bulk vessels and tankers particularly vulnerable to such attacks. If these piracy attacks result in regions in which our vessels are deployed being characterized by insurers as "war risk" zones by insurers or Joint War Committee "war and strikes" listed areas, premiums payable for such coverage could increase significantly and such insurance coverage may be more difficult to obtain. In addition, crew costs, including costs which may be incurred to the extent we employ onboard security guards, could increase in such circumstances. We may not be adequately insured to cover losses from these incidents, which could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, detention hijacking as a result of an act of piracy against our vessels, or an increase in cost, or unavailability of insurance for our vessels, could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay cash distributions and may result in loss of revenues, increased costs and decreased cash flows to our customers, which could impair their ability to make payments to us under our charters.

World events could affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Continuing conflicts and recent developments in North Korea, the Middle East including Egypt, and North Africa, including Libya, and the presence of United States and other armed forces in Afghanistan, may lead to additional acts of terrorism and armed conflict around the world, which may contribute to further economic instability in the global financial markets. These uncertainties could also adversely affect our ability to obtain financing on terms acceptable to us or at all. In the past, political conflicts have also resulted in attacks on vessels, mining of waterways and other efforts to disrupt international shipping, particularly in the Arabian Gulf region. Acts of terrorism and piracy have also affected vessels trading in regions such as the South China Sea and the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia. Any of these occurrences, or the perception that our vessels are potential terrorist targets, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay dividends.
Acts of piracy on ocean-going vessels could adversely affect our business.
Acts of piracy have historically affected ocean-going vessels trading in regions of the world such as the South China Sea, the Indian Ocean and in the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia. Although the frequency of sea piracy worldwide decreased in 2014 as compared to 2013, sea piracy incidents continue to occur, particularly in the Gulf of Aden off the coast of Somalia and increasingly in the Gulf of Guinea, with dry bulk vessels and tankers particularly vulnerable to such attacks. If these piracy attacks occur in regions in which our vessels are deployed that insurers characterize as "war risk" zones or by the Joint War Committee as "war and strikes" listed areas, premiums payable for such coverage could increase significantly and such insurance coverage may be more difficult to obtain. In addition, crew costs, including costs which may be incurred to the extent we employ on-board security guards, could increase in such circumstances. We may not be adequately insured to cover losses from these incidents, which could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, detention hijacking as a result of an act of piracy against our vessels, or an increase in cost, or unavailability of insurance for our vessels, could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, cash distributions.flows, financial condition and ability to pay dividends and may result in loss of revenues, increased costs and decreased cash flows to our customers, which could impair their ability to make payments to us under our charters.
 
Our vessels may call on ports located in countries that are subject to restrictions imposed by the U.S. or other governments, which could adversely affect our reputation and the market for our common shares.Ordinary Shares.
 
From time to time on charterers' instructions, our vessels may call on ports located in countries subject to sanctions and embargoes imposed by the United States government and countries identified by the U.S. government as state sponsors of terrorism, such as Cuba, Iran, Sudan and Syria. In the past, certain of our vessels have made port calls to Iran, however, none of our vessels made any port calls to Iran during 2012.2014. The U.S. sanctions and embargo laws and regulations vary in their application, as they do not all apply to the same covered persons or proscribe the same activities, and such sanctions and embargo laws and regulations may

6



be amended or strengthened over time. With effect from July 1, 2010, the U.S. enacted the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions Accountability and Divestment Act, or CISADA, which expanded the scope of the Iran Sanctions Act. Among other things, CISADA expands the application of the prohibitions to companies, such as ours, and introduces limits on the ability of companies and persons to do business or trade with Iran when such activities relate to the investment, supply or export of refined petroleum or petroleum products. In addition, on May 1, 2012, President Obama signed Executive Order 13608 which prohibits foreign

8



persons from violating or attempting to violate, or causing a violation of any sanctions in effect against Iran or facilitating any deceptive transactions for or on behalf of any person subject to U.S. sanctions. Any persons found to be in violation of Executive Order 13608 will be deemed a foreign sanctions evader and will be banned from all contacts with the United States, including conducting business in U.S. dollars. Also in 2012, President Obama signed into law the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, or the Iran Threat Reduction Act, which created new sanctions and strengthened existing sanctions. Among other things, the Iran Threat Reduction Act intensifies existing sanctions regarding the provision of goods, services, infrastructure or technology to Iran's petroleum or petrochemical sector. The Iran Threat Reduction Act also includes a provision requiring

On November 24, 2013, the President of theP5+1 (the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia and China) entered into an interim agreement with Iran entitled the “Joint Plan of Action” (“JPOA”). Under the JPOA it was agreed that, in exchange for Iran taking certain voluntary measures to impose five or moreensure that its nuclear program is used only for peaceful purposes, the U.S. and EU would voluntarily suspend certain sanctions for a period of six months. On January 20, 2014, the U.S. and E.U. indicated that they would begin implementing the temporary relief measures provided for under the JPOA. These measures include, among other things, the suspension of certain sanctions on the Iranian petrochemicals, precious metals, and automotive industries from Section 6(a) of the Iran Sanctions Act, as amended,January 20, 2014 until July 20, 2014. The JPOA has since been extended twice, and will expire on a person the President determines is a controlling beneficial owner of, or otherwise owns, operates, or controls or insures a vessel that was used to transport crude oil from Iran to another country and (1) if the person is a controlling beneficial owner of the vessel, the person had actual knowledge the vessel was so used or (2) if the person otherwise owns, operates, or controls, or insures the vessel, the person knew or should have known the vessel was so used. Such a person could be subject to a variety of sanctions, including exclusion from U.S. capital markets, exclusion from financial transactions subject to U.S. jurisdiction, and exclusion of that person's vessels from U.S. ports for up to two years.June 30, 2015.

Although we believe that we have been in compliance with all applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations, and intend to maintain such compliance, there can be no assurance that we will be in compliance in the future, particularly as the scope of certain laws may be unclear and may be subject to changing interpretations. Any such violation could result in fines, penalties or other sanctions that could severely impact our ability to access U.S. capital markets and conduct our business, and could result in some investors deciding, or being required, to divest their interest, or not to invest, in us. In addition, certain institutional investors may have investment policies or restrictions that prevent them from holding securities of companies that have contracts with countries identified by the U.S. government as state sponsors of terrorism. The determination by these investors not to invest in, or to divest from, our common stockshares may adversely affect the price at which our common stock trades.shares trade. Moreover, our charterers may violate applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations as a result of actions that do not involve us or our vessels, and those violations could in turn negatively affect our reputation. In addition, our reputation and the market for our securities may be adversely affected if we engage in certain other activities, such as entering into charters with individuals or entities in countries subject to U.S. sanctions and embargo laws that are not controlled by the governments of those countries, or engaging in operations associated with those countries pursuant to contracts with third parties that are unrelated to those countries or entities controlled by their governments. Investor perception of the value of our common stockshares may be adversely affected by the consequences of war, the effects of terrorism, civil unrest and governmental actions in these and surrounding countries.
 
Compliance with safety and other vessel requirements imposed by classification societies may be costly and could reduce our net cash flows and net income.
 
The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel must be certified as being "in class" by a classification society authorized by its country of registry. The classification society certifies that a vessel is safe and seaworthy in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the country of registry of the vessel and the Safety of Life at Sea Convention.
 
A vessel must undergo annual surveys, intermediate surveys and special surveys. In lieu of a special survey, a vessel's machinery may be placed on a continuous survey cycle, under which the machinery would be surveyed periodically over a five-year period. We expect our vessels to be on special survey cycles for hull inspection and continuous survey cycles for machinery inspection. Every vessel is also required to be drydocked, or inspected by divers. every two to three years for inspection of its underwater parts.
 
Compliance with the above requirements may result in significant expense. If any vessel does not maintain its class or fails any annual, intermediate or special survey, the vessel will be unable to trade between ports and will be unemployable, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay cash distributions.
 
We are subject to complex laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations, thatwhich can adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
 

7



Our operations arewill be subject to numerous laws and regulations in the form of international conventions and treaties, national, state and local laws and national and international regulations in force in the jurisdictions in which our vessels operate or are registered, which can significantly affect the ownership and operation of our vessels. These requirements include, but are not limited to, European Union, or EU, regulations, the U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, requirements of the U.S. Coast Guard, or USCG, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, the U.S. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, or CERCLA, the U.S. Clean Air Act, or CAA, the U.S. Clean Water Act, or CWA, the International Maritime Organization, or IMO, International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage of 1969, as from time to time amended and replaced by the 1992 protocol, and generally referred to as CLC, the IMO International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage of 2001, or the Bunker Convention, the IMO International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships of 1973, as from time to time amended and generally referred to as MARPOL, including the designation of Emission Control Areas, or ECAs thereunder, the IMO International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea of 1974, as from time to time amended and generally referred to as SOLAS, the IMO's International Safety Management code for the safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention, or ISM Code, the IMO International Convention

9



on Load Lines of 1966, as from time to time amended, and the U.S. Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002. 2002, or MTSA.

Compliance with such laws and regulations, where applicable, may require installation of costly equipment or operational changes and may affect the resale value or useful lives of our vessels. Compliance with such laws and regulations may require us to obtain certain permits or authorizations prior to commencing operations. Failure to obtain such permits or authorizations could materially impact our business results of operations, financial conditions and ability to pay cash distributions by delaying or limiting our ability to accept charterers. We may also incur additional costs in order to comply with other existing and future regulatory obligations, including, but not limited to, costs relating to air emissions including greenhouse gases, the management of ballast waters, maintenance and inspection, development and implementation of emergency procedures and insurance coverage or other financial assurance of our ability to address pollution incidents. Additionally, we cannot predict with certainty the cost of compliance with any new regulations that may be promulgated as a result of the 2010 BP plc Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico or otherwise in the future.Mexico. These costs could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition and our available cash.
The IMO, which is the United Nations agency for maritime safety and the prevention of pollution by ships, has negotiated international conventions that impose liability for pollution in international waters and the territorial waters of the nations signatory to such conventions. For example, the IMO adopted an International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments, or the BWM Convention, in February 2004. The BWM Convention's implementing regulations call for a phased introduction of mandatory ballast water exchange requirements, to be replaced in time with mandatory concentration limits. The BWM Convention will not become effective until 12 months after it has been adopted by 30 states, the combined merchant fleets of which represent not less than 35% of the gross tonnage of the world's merchant shipping. To date, there has not been sufficient adoption of this standard for it to take force. However, Panama may adopt this standard in the relatively near future, which would be sufficient for it to take force. If mid-ocean ballast exchange is made mandatory, or if ballast water treatment requirements or options are instituted, the cost of compliance could increase for ocean carriers, and the costs of ballast water treatment may be material.
 
A failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in administrative and civil penalties, criminal sanctions or the suspension or termination of our operations. Environmental laws often impose strict liability for remediation of spills and releases of oil and hazardous substances, which could subject us to liability, without regard to whether we were negligent or at fault. Under OPA, for example, owners, operators and bareboat charterers are jointly and severally strictly liable for the discharge of oil in U.S. waters, including the 200-nautical mile exclusive economic zone around the United States. An oil spill could also result in significant liability, including fines, penalties, criminal liability and remediation costs for natural resource damages under other international and U.S. federal,Federal, state and local laws, as well as third-party damages, including punitive damages, and could harm our reputation with current or potential charterers of our vessels. We will be required to satisfy insurance and financial responsibility requirements for potential oil (including marine fuel) spills and other pollution incidents. Although our technical manager will arrange for insurance to cover our vessels with respect to certain environmental risks, there can be no assurance that such insurance will be sufficient to cover all such risks or that any claims will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
 
If we fail to comply with international safety regulations, we may be subject to increased liability, which may adversely affect our insurance coverage and may result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports.
 
The operation of our vessels is affected by the requirements set forth in the IMO's International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and Pollution Prevention, or the ISM Code. The ISM Code requires shipowners, ship managers and bareboat charterers to develop and maintain an extensive "Safety Management System" that includes the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for safe operation and describing procedures for dealing with emergencies. If we fail to comply with the ISM Code, we may be subject to increased liability, may invalidate existing insurance or decrease available insurance coverage for our affected vessels and such failure may result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports.
 
Maritime claimants could arrest one or more of our vessels, which could interrupt our cash flow.
 
Crew members, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, shippers of cargo and other parties may be entitled to a maritime lien against a vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages. In many jurisdictions, a maritime lien holder may enforce its lien by "arresting" or "attaching" a vessel through foreclosure proceedings. The arrest or attachment of one or more of our vessels could result in a significant loss of earnings for the related off-hire period.
 

8



In addition, in jurisdictions where the "sister ship" theory of liability applies, such as South Africa, a claimant may arrest the vessel which is subject to the claimant's maritime lien and any "associated" vessel, which is any vessel owned or controlled by the same

10



owner. In countries with "sister ship" liability laws, claims might be asserted against us or any of our vessels for liabilities of other vessels that we own.
 
Governments could requisition our vessels during a period of war or emergency resulting in a loss of earnings.
 
A government of a vessel's registry could requisition for title or seize one or more of our vessels. Requisition for title occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and becomes the owner. A government could also requisition one or more of our vessels for hire. Requisition for hire occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and effectively becomes the charterer at dictated charter rates.  Generally, requisitions occur during a period of war or emergency. Government requisition of one or more of our vessels could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay cash distributions.

Risks Related to Our Business
 
A drop in spot charter rates may provide an incentive for some charterers to default on their charters.
When we enter into a time charter or bareboat charter, charter rates under that charter are fixed for the term of the charter. Our four Capesize vessels are currently fixed on time charters expiring between 2013 and 2014. If the spot charter rates or short-term time charter rates in the dry bulk shipping industry become significantly lower than the time charter equivalent rates that some of our charterers are obligated to pay us under our existing charters, the charterers may have incentive to default under that charter or attempt to renegotiate the charter. As described in "Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview", in 2012 we agreed to reduce the daily hire rate in respect of the Belgravia and the charterers of the Golden Zhejiang and Battersea defaulted on their charters and redelivered the vessels prior to the expiration of the charters. If our charterers fail to pay their obligations, we would have to attempt to re-charter our vessels at lower charter rates, which would affect our ability to comply with our loan covenants and operate our vessels profitably. If we are not able to comply with our loan covenants and our lenders choose to accelerate our indebtedness and foreclose their liens, we could be required to sell vessels in our fleet and our ability to continue to conduct our business would be impaired.
We are subject to certain risks with respect to our counterparties on contracts, and failure of such counterparties to meet their obligations could cause us to suffer losses or otherwise adversely affect our business.
We have entered into various contracts, including charterparties with our customers, loan agreements with our lenders and vessel management and other agreements with our General Manager and our Dry bulk Manager, which subject us to counterparty risks. The ability of each of the counterparties to perform its obligations under a contract with us or contracts entered into on our behalf will depend on a number of factors that are beyond our control and may include, among other things, general economic conditions, the condition of the shipping sector, the overall financial condition of the counterparty, charter rates received for our vessels and the supply and demand for commodities. As described in “Item 4. Information on the Company-B. Business Overview,” in September 2012 we announced that the sale of the Hampstead was not completed due to the buyer's default, although the vessel was subsequently remarketed for sale and was sold with delivery to the new buyer in September 2012. In addition, in March 2013 we entered into an agreement to sell our only VLCC tanker, which we expect to deliver to its purchaser in the second quarter of 2013. If we fail to consummate this transaction we, among other things, will continue to be subject to the risks associated with operating tanker vessels. In addition, should a counterparty fail to honor its obligations under any such contract, we could sustain significant losses which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Charterers are sensitive to the commodity markets and may be impacted by market forces affecting commodities. In addition, in depressed market conditions, charterers may have incentive to renegotiate their charters or default on their obligations under charters. During 2012, the charterers of the Golden Zhejiang, Battersea and VLCC Mayfair defaulted on their charters and the vessels were redelivered to us prior to the expiration of the charter period. Should a charterer in future fail to honor its obligations under agreements with us, it may be difficult to secure substitute employment for such vessel, and any new charter arrangements we secure on the spot market or on charters may be at lower rates, depending on the then existing charter rate levels, compared to the rates currently being charged for our vessels. In addition, if the charterer of a vessel in our fleet that is used as collateral under one or more of our loan agreements defaults on its charter obligations to us, such default may constitute an event of default under our loan agreements, which may allow the bank to exercise remedies under our loan agreements. If our charterers fail to meet their obligations to us or attempt to renegotiate our charter agreements, we could sustain significant losses which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, as well as our ability to pay cash distributions, if any, in the future, and compliance with covenants in our loan agreements. Further, if we had to find a replacement technical manager, we may need approval from our lenders to change the technical manager.


11



We may not be able to implement our growth successfully.
Our intention is to renew and grow our fleet through selective acquisitions of dry bulk or tanker tonnage. Our business plan will therefore depend upon our ability to identify and acquire suitable vessels to grow our fleet in the future and successfully employ our vessels.
Growing any business by acquisition presents numerous risks, including undisclosed liabilities and obligations, difficulty obtaining additional qualified personnel and managing relationships with customers and suppliers. In addition, competition from other companies, many of which may have significantly greater financial resources than us, may reduce our acquisition opportunities or cause us to pay higher prices. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in executing our plans to establish and grow our business or that we will not incur significant expenses and losses in connection with these plans. Our failure to effectively identify, purchase, develop and integrate any vessels could impede our ability to establish our operations or implement our growth successfully. Our acquisition growth strategy exposes us to risks that may harm our business, financial condition and operating results, including risks that we may:

fail to realize anticipated benefits, such as cost savings or cash flow enhancements;
incur or assume unanticipated liabilities, losses or costs associated with any vessels or businesses acquired, particularly if any vessel we acquire proves not to be in good condition;
be unable to hire, train or retain qualified shore and seafaring personnel to manage and operate our growing business and fleet;
decrease our liquidity by using a significant portion of available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions;
significantly increase our interest expense or financial leverage if we incur debt to finance acquisitions; or
incur other significant charges, such as impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets, asset devaluation or restructuring charges.

We will need to procure additional financing in order to complete the construction of our newbuilding vessels, which may be difficult to obtain on acceptable terms or at all.
 
We cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain additional financing at all or on terms acceptable to us. If adequate funds are not available, we may have to reduce expenditures for investments in new and existing projects, which could hinder our growth and prevent us from realizing potential revenues from prior investments which will have a negative impact on our cash flows and results of operations.

As of March 31, 2015, after completion of the dateMerger, we were committed to make newbuilding installments of this annual report, we have paid $15.4$935.5 million with expected payment of $490.8 million in installments2015 and have purchase commitments of $87.0 million relating to our two Capesize newbuilding contracts with expected payments of $5.1 million and $81.9$444.7 million in 2014 and 2015, respectively.2016. We expectcurrently have undrawn, available debt financing of $470.0 million for 16 of these newbuilding contracts. We intend to finance these paymentsthe remaining newbuilding commitments and any shortfall in financing commitments arising from a fall in vessel values with cash on hand, operating cash flow and, bankif market conditions permit, proceeds from debt that we intend to arrange.and equity financings. If such financing is not available when our capital commitments are due, we may be unable to meet such obligations and finance our other and future obligations. If for any reason we fail to take delivery of the newbuilding vessels described above, we would be prevented from realizing potential revenues from these vessels, we may be required to forego deposits on construction which amounted to an aggregate of $15.4 million as of the date of this annual report, and we may incur additional costs and liability to the shipyard under the construction contracts.

Purchasing and operating previously owned, or secondhand, vessels may result in increased drydocking costs and vessels off-hire, which could adversely affect our earnings.
Our current level of indebtedness could significantly limit our ability to execute our business strategy includes growth throughand has increased the acquisitionrisk of previously owned vessels. Evendefault under our debt obligations.

As of March 31, 2015, and following a physical inspectioncompletion of secondhand vessels prior to purchase,the Merger, we had $1,140.4 million of outstanding indebtedness under our outstanding credit facilities and debt securities. Our credit facilities impose operating and financial restrictions on us that limit our ability, or the ability of our subsidiaries party thereto to:

pay dividends and make capital expenditures if we do not haverepay amounts drawn under our credit facilities or if there is another default under our credit facilities;
incur additional indebtedness, including the same knowledge about their conditionissuance of guarantees;
create liens on our assets;
change the flag, class or management of our vessels or terminate or materially amend the management agreement relating to each vessel;
sell our vessels;
merge or consolidate with, or transfer all or substantially all our assets to, another person; or
enter into a new line of business.

Therefore, we may need to seek permission from our lenders in order to engage in some corporate actions. Our lenders’ interests may be different from ours and cost of any required (or anticipated) repairs that we would have had if these vessels had been built for and operated exclusively by us. Accordingly, we may not discover defectsbe able to obtain our lenders’ permission when needed. This may limit our ability to pay dividends on our common shares if we determine to do so in the future, and interest on our Notes, finance our future operations or other problems with such vessels prior to purchase. Any such hidden defectscapital requirements, make acquisitions or problems, when detected, may be expensive to repair, and if not detected, may result in accidents or other incidents for which we may become liable to third parties. Also, when purchasing previously owned vessels, we do not receive the benefit of any builder warranties if the vessels we buy are older than one year.pursue business opportunities.
 
In general, the costs to maintain a vessel in good operating condition increase with the age of the vessel. Older vessels are typically less fuel efficient than more recently constructed vessels due to improvements in engine technology. Governmental regulations, safety and other equipment standards related to the age of vessels may require expenditures for alterations or the addition, of new equipment to some of our vessels and may restrict the type of activities in which these vessels may engage. We cannot assure you that, as our vessels age, market conditions will justify those expenditures or enable us to operate our vessels profitably during the

12



remainder of their useful lives. As a result, regulations and standards could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to pay cash distributions.
The volatility in dry bulk charter rates, and vessel values, may affect our ability to comply with various covenants in our loan agreements.
Our loan agreements for our borrowings, which are secured by liens on our vessels, contain various financial covenants. Among those covenants are requirements that relate to our financial position, operating performance and liquidity. For example, there are financial covenants that require us to maintain (i) a minimum value adjusted equity that is based, in part, upon the market

9



value of the vessels securing the loans, (ii) minimum levels of free cash, and (iii) a positive working capital.capital, and (iv) a loan-to-value clause, which could require us to post collateral or prepay a portion of the outstanding borrowings should the value of the vessels securing borrowings decrease below a required level. The market value of dry bulk vessels is sensitive, among other things, to changes in the dry bulk market, with vessel values deteriorating in times when dry bulk rates are falling or anticipated to fall and improving when charter rates are rising or anticipated to rise. Such conditions may result in our not being in compliance with these loan covenants. In such a situation, unless our lenders were willing to provide waivers of covenant compliance or modifications to our covenants, or would be willing to refinance our indebtedness, we may have to sell vessels in our fleet and/or seek to raise additional capital in the equity markets in order to comply with our loan covenants. Furthermore, if the value of our vessels deteriorates significantly, we may have to record an impairment adjustment in our financial statements, which would adversely affect our financial results and further hinder our ability to raise capital.
 
If we are not in compliance with our covenants and are not able to obtain covenant waivers or modifications, our lenders could require us to post additional collateral, enhance our equity and liquidity, increase our interest payments or pay down our indebtedness to a level where we are in compliance with our loan covenants, sell vessels in our fleet, or they could accelerate our indebtedness, which would impair our ability to continue to conduct our business. In such an event, our auditors may give either an unqualified opinion with an explanatory paragraph relating to the disclosure in the notes to our financial statements as to the substantial doubt of our ability to continue as a going concern, or a qualified, adverse or disclaimer of opinion, which could lead to additional defaults under our loan agreements. If our indebtedness is accelerated, we might not be able to refinance our debt or obtain additional financing and could lose our vessels if our lenders foreclose their liens. In addition, if we find it necessary to sell our vessels at a time when vessel prices are low, we will recognize losses and a reduction in our earnings, which could affect our ability to raise additional capital necessary for us to comply with our loan agreements.
Our ability to obtain additional debt financing may be dependent on the performance of our then existing charterers Please see “Item 5. Operating Financial Review and the creditworthiness of our charterers.
The actual or perceived credit quality of our charterers,Prospects-B. Liquidity and any defaults by them, may materially affect our ability to obtain the additional capital resources required to purchase additional vessels or may significantly increase our costs of obtaining such capital. Our inability to obtain additional financing at anticipated costs or at all may materially affect our results of operations and our ability to implement our business strategy.

Fuel or bunker prices, may adversely affect our profits.
For vessels on voyage charters, fuel oil, or bunkers, is a significant, if not the largest, expense. Changes in the price of fuel may adversely affect our profitability to the extent we have vessels on voyage charters. The price and supply of fuel is unpredictable and fluctuates based on events outside our control, including geopolitical developments, supply and demand for oil and gas, actions by OPEC and other oil and gas producers, war and unrest in oil producing countries and regions, regional production patterns and environmental concerns. Further, fuel may become much more expensive in the future, which may reduce the profitability and competitiveness of our business versus other forms of transportation, such as truck or rail.
The operation of dry bulk carriers involves certain unique operational risks.
The operation of dry bulk carriers has certain unique operational risks. With a dry bulk carrier, the cargo itself and its interaction with the ship can be a risk factor. By their nature, dry bulk cargoes are often heavy, dense and easily shifted, and react badly to water exposure. In addition, dry bulk carriers are often subjected to battering treatment during unloading operations with grabs, jackhammers (to pry encrusted cargoes out of the hold), and small bulldozers. This treatment may cause damage to the dry bulk carrier. Dry bulk carriers damaged due to treatment during unloading procedures may be more susceptible to a breach to the sea. Hull breaches in dry bulk carriers may lead to the flooding of their holds. If a dry bulk carrier suffers flooding in its forward holds, the bulk cargo may become so dense and waterlogged that its pressure may buckle the dry bulk carrier's bulkheads leading to the loss of the dry bulk carrier.

13



If we are unable to adequately maintain or safeguard our vessels we may be unable to prevent these events. Any of these circumstances or events could negatively impact our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, the loss of any of our vessels could harm our reputation as a safe and reliable vessel owner and operator.
Our results of operations are subject to seasonal fluctuations, which may adversely affect our financial condition.
We plan to operate our vessels in markets that have historically exhibited seasonal variations in demand and, as a result, charter rates. This seasonality may result in quarter-to-quarter volatility in our operating results, as one of our vessels currently trades in the spot market and our other vessels may trade in the spot market from time to time.
Because the market value of our vessels may fluctuate significantly, we may incur losses when we sell vessels, which may adversely affect our earnings.
The fair market value of vessels may increase and decrease depending on but not limited to the following factors:

general economic and market conditions affecting the shipping industry;
competition from other shipping companies;
types and sizes of vessels;
the availability of other modes of transportations;
cost of newbuildings;
shipyard capacity;
governmental or other regulations;
age of vessels;
prevailing level of charter rates;
the need to upgrade secondhand and previously owned vessels as a result of charterer requirements, and
technological advances in vessel design or equipment or otherwise.

During the period a vessel is subject to a charter, we will not be permitted to sell it to take advantage of increases in vessel values without the charterer's consent. If we sell a vessel at a time when ship prices have fallen, the sale may be at less than the vessel's carrying amount on our financial statements, with the result that we could incur a loss and a reduction in earnings. In addition, if we determine at any time that a vessel's future useful life and earnings require us to impair its value on our financial statements, this would result in a charge against our earnings and a reduction of our shareholders' equity. It is possible that the market value of our vessels will continue to decline in the future, which could adversely affect our ability to comply with financial covenants contained in our loan agreements or any other financing arrangements we may enter into in the future.
Conversely, if vessel values are elevated at a time when we wish to acquire additional vessels, the cost of acquisition may increase and this could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.
We may be unable to successfully compete with other vessel operators for charters, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.
The operation of dry bulk vessels and transportation of dry bulk cargoes is extremely competitive. Through our operating subsidiaries we compete with other vessel owners, and, to a lesser extent, owners of other size vessels. The dry bulk market is highly fragmented. It is possible that we could not obtain suitable employment for our vessels, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.
Our time charters may limit our ability to benefit from any improvement in charter rates, and at the same time, our revenues may be adversely affected if we do not successfully employ our vessels on the expiration of our charters.
Our four Capesize vessels are currently fixed on time charters expiring between 2013 and 2014. Although our time charters generally provide reliable revenues, they also limit the portion of our fleet available for spot market voyages during an upswing in the dry bulk industry cycle, when spot market voyages might be more profitable. By the same token, we cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully employ our vessels in the future or renew our existing charters at rates sufficient to allow us to operate our business profitably or meet our obligations. A decline in charter or spot rates or a failure to successfully charter our vessels could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to pay cash distributions.Capital Resources.” 
 
We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance our existing indebtedness incurred under our current credit facilities.on acceptable terms.
 

14



We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance our indebtedness on terms that are acceptable to us or at all. If we are not able to refinance our indebtedness, we will have to dedicate a greater portion of our cash flow from operations to pay the principal and interest of this indebtedness. We cannot assure you that we will be able to generate cash flow in amounts that are sufficient for these purposes. If we are not able to satisfy these obligations, we may have to undertake alternative financing plans or sell our assets. In addition, debt service payments under our credit facilities may limit funds otherwise available for working capital, capital expenditures, payment of cash distributions and other purposes. If we are unable to meet our debt obligations, or if we otherwise default under our credit facilities, our lenders could declare the debt, together with accrued interest and fees, to be immediately due and payable and foreclose on our fleet, which could result in the acceleration of other indebtedness that we may have at such time and the commencement of similar foreclosure proceedings by other lenders.
 
Our financing obligations could affect our ability to incur additional indebtedness or engage in certain transactions.
Our financing agreements impose operational and financing restrictions on us and/or on our subsidiaries, which may significantly limit or prohibit, among other things, our and/or our subsidiaries' ability to, without the consent of our lenders, incur additional indebtedness, create liens, sell capital interests of subsidiaries, make certain investments, engage in mergers and acquisitions, purchase and sell vessels, enter into certain charters or, if an event of default has occurred, pay cash distributions. In addition, our lenders may accelerate the maturity of indebtedness under our financing agreements and foreclose on the collateral securing the indebtedness upon the occurrence of certain events of default, including our failure to comply with any of the covenants contained in our financing agreements, not rectified within the permitted time. For instance, declining vessel values could lead to a breach of covenants under our financing agreements. If we are unable to prepay, pledge additional collateral or obtain waivers from our lenders, our lenders could accelerate our debt and foreclose on our vessels. In addition, if the lenders are entitled to accelerate the debt outstanding under one facility in default, it could result in a default on our other facilities.

A drop in spot charter rates may provide an incentive for some charterers to default on their charters.
When we enter into a time charter or bareboat charter, charter rates under that charter may be fixed for the term of the charter. Six of our vessels are currently on a fixed rate time charters expiring between November 2016 and December 2021. If the spot charter rates or short-term time charter rates in the dry bulk shipping industry become significantly lower than the time charter equivalent rates that some of our charterers are obligated to pay us under our existing charters, the charterers may have incentive to default under that charter or attempt to renegotiate the charter. If our charterers fail to pay their obligations, we would have to attempt to re-charter our vessels at lower charter rates, which would affect our ability to comply with our loan covenants and operate our vessels profitably. If we are not able to comply with our loan covenants and our lenders choose to accelerate our indebtedness and foreclose their liens, we could be required to sell vessels in our fleet and our ability to continue to conduct our business would be impaired.

10




Our ability to obtain additional debt financing may be dependent on the performance of our then existing charterers and their creditworthiness.
The actual or perceived credit quality of our charterers, and any defaults by them, may materially affect our ability to obtain the additional capital resources required to purchase additional vessels or may significantly increase our costs of obtaining such capital. Our inability to obtain additional financing at anticipated costs or at all may materially affect our results of operations and our ability to implement our business strategy.

We generatemay fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger, and the integration process could adversely impact our ongoing operations.

We completed the Merger on March 31, 2015 (see "Item 4A-Information on the Company" for more information) with the expectation that it would result in various benefits, including, among other things, the creation of a substantiallarger listed company that would be more attractive to investors, improved purchasing and placing power, an expanded customer base and ongoing cost savings and operating efficiencies. The success of the Merger will depend, in part, on our ability to realize such anticipated benefits from combining Knightsbridge's business with that of the Former Golden Ocean. The anticipated benefits and cost savings of the Merger may not be realized fully, or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected. Failure to achieve anticipated benefits could result in increased costs and decreases in the amounts of our expected revenues or results.

Knightsbridge and the Former Golden Ocean operated independently until the completion of the Merger. While the Former Golden Ocean was the commercial manager of all of our operating vessels, it is possible that the integration process could result in disruption of each company’s ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures or policies that adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with customers and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the Merger. Integration efforts between the two companies will also divert management attention and resources. These integration matters could have an adverse effect on us during the transition period. The integration may take longer than anticipated and may have unanticipated adverse results relating to our existing business.

Certain of our directors, executive officers and major shareholders may have interests that are different from the interests of our other shareholders.

Certain of our directors, executive officers and major shareholders may have interests that are different from, or are in addition to, the interests of our other shareholders. In particular, Hemen Holding Limited, a company indirectly controlled by trusts established by John Fredriksen for the benefit of his immediate family, or Hemen, and certain of its affiliates own approximately 62% of our issued and outstanding shares. Please see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transaction-A. Major Shareholders.” 

Hemen is also a principal shareholder of a number of other large publicly traded companies involved in various sectors of the shipping and oil services industries, or the Hemen Related Companies. In addition, certain of our directors, including Hans Petter Aas, John Fredriksen and Kate Blankenship, also serve on the boards of one or more of the Hemen Related Companies, including but not limited to, Frontline Ltd. (NYSE:FRO), or Frontline, Frontline 2012 Ltd., or Frontline 2012, Ship Finance International Limited (NYSE:SFL), or Ship Finance, Seadrill Limited (NYSE:SDRL), or Seadrill, and North Atlantic Drilling Ltd. (NYSE:NADL), or NADL. There may be real or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to matters affecting Hemen and other Hemen Related Companies whose interests in some circumstances may be adverse to our interests.

To the extent that we do business with or compete with other Hemen Related Companies for business opportunities, prospects or financial resources, or participate in ventures in which other Hemen Related Companies may participate, these directors and officers may face actual or apparent conflicts of interest in connection with decisions that could have different implications for us. These decisions may relate to corporate opportunities, corporate strategies, potential acquisitions of businesses, newbuilding acquisitions, inter-company agreements, the issuance or disposition of securities, the election of new or additional directors and other matters. Such potential conflicts may delay or limit the opportunities available to us, and it is possible that conflicts may be resolved in a manner adverse to us.
We are subject to certain risks with respect to our counterparties on contracts, and failure of such counterparties to meet their obligations could cause us to suffer losses or otherwise adversely affect our business.
We have entered into various contracts, including charter parties with our customers, loan agreements with our lenders, vessel managements and other agreements, which subject us to counterparty risks. The ability of each of the counterparties to perform its obligations under a contract with us or contracts entered into on our behalf will depend on a number of factors that are beyond

11



our control and may include, among other things, general economic conditions, the condition of the shipping sector, the overall financial condition of the counterparty, charter rates received for our vessels and the supply and demand for commodities. We have entered into newbuilding contracts with shipyards in Japan, the Republic of Korea, and China. Should a counterparty fail to honor its obligations under any such contract, we could sustain significant losses which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Charterers are sensitive to the commodity markets and may be impacted by market forces affecting commodities. In addition, in depressed market conditions, charterers may have incentive to renegotiate their charters or default on their obligations under charters. Should a charterer in future fail to honor its obligations under agreements with us, it may be difficult to secure substitute employment for such vessel, and any new charter arrangements we secure on the spot market or on charters may be at lower rates, depending on the then existing charter rate levels, compared to the rates currently being charged for our vessels. In addition, if the charterer of a vessel in our fleet that is used as collateral under one or more of our loan agreements defaults on its charter obligations to us, such default may constitute an event of default under our loan agreements, which may allow the bank to exercise remedies under our loan agreements. If our charterers fail to meet their obligations to us or attempt to renegotiate our charter agreements, we could sustain significant losses which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, as well as our ability to pay cash distributions, if any, in the future, and compliance with covenants in our loan agreements. Further, if we had to find a replacement technical manager, we may need approval from our lenders to change the technical manager.

We may not be able to implement our growth successfully.
Our intention is to renew and grow our fleet through selective acquisitions of dry bulk tonnage. Our business plan will therefore depend upon our ability to identify and acquire suitable vessels to grow our fleet in the future and successfully employ our vessels.
Growing any business by acquisition presents numerous risks, including undisclosed liabilities and obligations, difficulty obtaining additional qualified personnel and managing relationships with customers and suppliers. In addition, competition from other companies, many of which may have significantly greater financial resources than us, may reduce our acquisition opportunities or cause us to pay higher prices. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in executing our plans to establish and grow our business or that we will not incur significant expenses and losses in connection with these plans. Our failure to effectively identify, purchase, develop and integrate any vessels could impede our ability to establish our operations or implement our growth successfully. Our acquisition growth strategy exposes us to risks that may harm our business, financial condition and operating results, including risks that we may:

fail to realize anticipated benefits, such as cost savings or cash flow enhancements;
incur or assume unanticipated liabilities, losses or costs associated with any vessels or businesses acquired, particularly if any vessel we acquire proves not to be in good condition;
be unable to hire, train or retain qualified shore and seafaring personnel to manage and operate our growing business and fleet;
decrease our liquidity by using a significant portion of available cash or borrowing capacity to finance acquisitions;
significantly increase our revenues frominterest expense or financial leverage if we incur debt to finance acquisitions; or
incur other significant charges, such as impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets, asset devaluation or restructuring charges.

Purchasing and operating previously owned, or secondhand, vessels may result in increased drydocking costs and vessels off-hire, which could adversely affect our earnings.
Our current business strategy includes growth through the acquisition of previously owned vessels. Even following a limited numberphysical inspection of customers.secondhand vessels prior to purchase, we do not have the same knowledge about their condition and cost of any required (or anticipated) repairs that we would have had if these vessels had been built for and operated exclusively by us. Accordingly, we may not discover defects or other problems with such vessels prior to purchase. Any such hidden defects or problems, when detected, may be expensive to repair, and if not detected, may result in accidents or other incidents for which we may become liable to third parties. Also, when purchasing previously owned vessels, we do not receive the benefit of any builder warranties if the vessels we buy are older than one year.
In general, the costs to maintain a vessel in good operating condition increase with the age of the vessel. Older vessels are typically less fuel efficient than more recently constructed vessels due to improvements in engine technology. Governmental regulations, safety and other equipment standards related to the age of vessels may require expenditures for alterations or the addition of new equipment to some of our vessels and may restrict the type of activities in which these vessels may engage. We cannot assure you

12



that, as our vessels age, market conditions will justify those expenditures or enable us to operate our vessels profitably during the remainder of their useful lives. As a result, regulations and standards could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to pay cash distributions.

The operation of dry bulk carriers involves certain unique operational risks.
The operation of dry bulk carriers has certain unique operational risks. With a dry bulk carrier, the cargo itself and its interaction with the ship can be a risk factor. By their nature, dry bulk cargoes are often heavy, dense and easily shifted, and react badly to water exposure. In addition, dry bulk carriers are often subjected to battering treatment during unloading operations with grabs, jackhammers (to pry encrusted cargoes out of the hold), and small bulldozers. This treatment may cause damage to the dry bulk carrier. Dry bulk carriers damaged due to treatment during unloading procedures may be more susceptible to a breach to the sea. Hull breaches in dry bulk carriers may lead to the flooding of their holds. If a dry bulk carrier suffers flooding in its forward holds, the bulk cargo may become so dense and waterlogged that its pressure may buckle the dry bulk carrier's bulkheads leading to the loss of the dry bulk carrier.
If we are unable to adequately maintain or safeguard our vessels we may be unable to prevent these events. Any of these circumstances or events could negatively impact our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, the loss of any of our vessels could harm our reputation as a safe and reliable vessel owner and operator.

Rising fuel, or bunker, prices may adversely affect our profits.

Since we primarily employ our vessels in the spot market, we expect that fuel, or bunkers, will be typically the largest expense in our shipping operations for our vessels. While we believe that we will experience a competitive advantage as a result of increased bunker prices due to the greater fuel efficiency of our vessels compared to the average global fleet, changes in the price of fuel may adversely affect our profitability. The price and supply of fuel is unpredictable and fluctuates based on events outside our control, including geopolitical developments, supply and demand for oil and gas, actions by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC, and other oil and gas producers, war and unrest in oil producing countries and regions, regional production patterns and environmental concerns. Despite lower fuel oil prices in the beginning of 2015, fuel may become much more expensive in the future, which may reduce our profitability.
 
Our results of operations are subject to seasonal fluctuations, which may adversely affect our financial condition.
We plan to operate our vessels in markets that have historically exhibited seasonal variations in demand and, as a result, charter rates. This seasonality may result in quarter-to-quarter volatility in our operating results, as most of our vessels currently trade in the spot market.
The fair market values of our vessels have declined and may decline further, which could limit the amount of funds that we can borrow, cause us to breach certain financial covenants in our credit facilities, or result in an impairment charge, and we may incur a loss if we sell vessels following a decline in their market value.
The fair market values of dry bulk vessels, including our vessels, have generally experienced high volatility and have recently declined significantly. The fair market value of vessels may increase and decrease depending on but not limited to the following factors:

general economic and market conditions affecting the shipping industry;
competition from other shipping companies;
types and sizes of vessels;
the availability of other modes of transportations;
cost of newbuildings;
shipyard capacity;
governmental or other regulations;
age of vessels;
prevailing level of charter rates;
the need to upgrade secondhand and previously owned vessels as a result of charterer requirements, and
technological advances in vessel design or equipment or otherwise.

During the period a vessel is subject to a charter, we will not be permitted to sell it to take advantage of increases in vessel values without the charterer's consent. If we sell a vessel at a time when ship prices have fallen, the sale may be at less than the vessel's carrying amount on our financial statements, with the result that we could incur a loss and a reduction in earnings. In addition, if

13



we determine at any time that a vessel's future useful life and earnings require us to impair its value on our financial statements, this would result in a charge against our earnings and a reduction of our shareholders' equity. If the fair market values of our vessels decline, or decline further, the amount of funds we may draw down under our secured credit facilities may be materiallylimited and we may not be in compliance with certain covenants contained in our secured credit facilities, which may result in an event of default. In such circumstances, we may not be able to refinance our debt or obtain additional financing. If we are not able to comply with the covenants in our secured credit facilities, and are unable to remedy the relevant breach, our lenders could accelerate our debt and foreclose on our fleet.
Conversely, if vessel values are elevated at a time when we wish to acquire additional vessels, the cost of acquisition may increase and this could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.
We may be unable to successfully compete with other vessel operators for charters, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.
The operation of dry bulk vessels and transportation of dry bulk cargoes is extremely competitive. Through our operating subsidiaries we compete with other vessel owners, and, to a lesser extent, owners of other size vessels. The dry bulk market is highly fragmented. It is possible that we could not obtain suitable employment for our vessels, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.
Our fixed rate time charters may limit our ability to benefit from any improvement in charter rates, and at the same time, our revenues may be adversely affected if one or morewe do not successfully employ our vessels on the expiration of our customers failedcharters.
Six of our vessels are currently on a fixed rate time charters expiring between November 2016 and December 2021. Although our fixed rate time charters generally provide reliable revenues, they also limit the portion of our fleet available for spot market voyages during an upswing in the dry bulk industry cycle, when spot market voyages might be more profitable. By the same token, we cannot assure you that we will be able to compensatesuccessfully employ our vessels in the future or renew our existing charters at rates sufficient to allow us forto operate our services, terminatedbusiness profitably or meet our contracts withobligations. A decline in charter or without cause, failedspot rates or a failure to renew its existing contracts or refusedsuccessfully charter our vessels could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to award new contracts to us and we are unable to enter into contracts with new customers at comparable daily rates.pay cash distributions.
 
Declines in charter rates and other market deterioration could cause us to incur impairment charges.
 
The carrying values of our vessels are reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the vessel may no longer be recoverable. We assess recoverability of the carrying value by estimating the future net cash flows expected to result from the vessel, including eventual disposal. If the future net undiscounted cash flows and the estimated fair market value of the vessel are less than the carrying value an impairment loss is recorded equal to the difference between the vessel's carrying value and fair value. Any impairment charges incurred as a result of declines in charter rates and other market deterioration could negatively affect our business, financial condition or operating results or the trading price of our common shares. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we recorded an impairment loss of $5.3 million related to the VLCC Mayfair. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we recorded an impairment loss of $41.6 million related to the VLCCs Titan Venus (ex Camden) ($14.7 million), the Kensington ($13.5 million) and the Mayfair ($13.4 million).
 
Operational risks and damage to our vessels could adversely impact our performance.
 
Our vessels and their cargoes are at risk of being damaged or lost because of events such as marine disasters, bad weather and other acts of God, business interruptions caused by mechanical failures, grounding, fire, explosions and collisions, human error, war, terrorism, piracy and other circumstances or events. Changing economic, regulatory and political conditions in some countries, including political and military conflicts, have from time to time resulted in attacks on vessels, mining of waterways, piracy, terrorism, labor strikes and boycotts. These hazards may result in death or injury to persons, loss of revenues or property, the payment of ransoms, environmental damage, higher insurance rates, damage to our customer relationships and market disruptions, delay or rerouting.
 
If our vessels suffer damage, they may need to be repaired at a drydocking facility. The costs of drydock repairs are unpredictable and may be substantial. We may have to pay drydocking costs that our insurance does not cover at all or in full. The loss of revenues while these vessels are being repaired and repositioned, as well as the actual cost of these repairs, may adversely affect our business and financial condition. In addition, space at drydocking facilities is sometimes limited and not all drydocking facilities are conveniently located. We may be unable to find space at a suitable drydocking facility or our vessels may be forced to travel to a drydocking facility that is not conveniently located relative to our vessels' positions. The loss of earnings while these vessels are forced to wait for space or to travel to more distant drydocking facilities may adversely affect our business and financial condition.

14



Further, the total loss of any of our vessels could harm our reputation as a safe and reliable vessel owner and operator. If we are unable to adequately maintain or safeguard our vessels, we may be unable to prevent any such damage, costs or loss which could negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and ability to pay cash distributions.
 
Increased inspection procedures, tighter import and export controls and new security regulations could increase costs and cause disruption of our business.
 
International shipping is subject to security and customs inspection and related procedures in countries of origin, destination and trans-shipment points. Since the events of September 11, 2001, there have been a variety of initiatives intended to enhance vessel security. On November 25, 2002,Under the U.S. Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002, or MTSA, came into effect. To implement certain portions of the MTSA, in July 2003, the U.S. Coast GuardUSCG issued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. These security procedures can result in delays in the loading, offloading or trans-shipment and the levying of customs duties, fines or other penalties against exporters or importers and, in some cases, carriers. Future changes to the existing security procedures may be implemented that could affect the dry bulk sector. These changes have the potential to impose additional financial and legal obligations on carriers

15



and, in certain cases, to render the shipment of certain types of goods uneconomical or impractical. These additional costs could reduce the volume of goods shipped, resulting in a decreased demand for vessels and have a negative effect on our business, revenues and customer relations.
 
Failure to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act could result in fines, criminal penalties and an adverse effect on our business.
 
We may operate in a number of countries throughout the world, including countries known to have a reputation for corruption. We are committed to doing business in accordance with applicable anti-corruption laws and have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics which is consistent and in full compliance with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977. We are subject, however, to the risk that we, our affiliated entities or our or their respective officers, directors, employees and agents may take actions determined to be in violation of such anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Any such violation could result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties, or curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions, and might adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. In addition, actual or alleged violations could damage our reputation and ability to do business. Furthermore, detecting, investigating, and resolving actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our senior management.
One of our directors is affiliated with Golden Ocean Group Limited, which could result in conflicts of interest that may not be resolved in our favor.
Mr. Herman Billung, a member of our board of directors, also serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Golden Ocean Management AS, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Golden Ocean Group Limited, or Golden Ocean. Another subsidiary of Golden Ocean provides commercial management services for our dry bulk carriers, and we have also purchased two vessels from Golden Ocean. To the extent that we do business with Golden Ocean or Golden Ocean competes with us for business opportunities, prospects or financial resources, or participates in ventures in which we may participate, Mr. Billung may face actual or apparent conflicts of interest in connection with decisions that could have different implications for us and Golden Ocean. These decisions may relate to corporate opportunities, corporate strategies, potential acquisitions of businesses, inter-company agreements, competition, the issuance or disposition of securities, the election of new or additional directors and other matters. Such potential conflicts may delay or limit the opportunities available to us, and it is possible that conflicts may be resolved in a manner adverse to us.
 
Incurrence of expenses or liabilities may reduce or eliminate distributions.
 
Our policy is to make distributions to shareholders based on earnings and cash flow. The amount and timing of cash distributions will depend on our earnings, financial condition, cash position, Bermuda law affecting the payment of distributions and other factors. However, we could incur other expenses or contingent liabilities that would reduce or eliminate the cash available for distribution by us as cash distributions. In addition, the declaration and payment of cash distributions is subject at all times to the discretion of our board of directors.Board. We cannot assure you that we will pay cash distributions.
Our financing obligations could affect our ability to incur additional indebtedness or engage in certain transactions.
Our financing agreements impose operational and financing restrictions on us and/or on our subsidiaries, which may significantly limit or prohibit, among other things, our and/or our subsidiaries' ability to, without the consent of our lenders, incur additional indebtedness, create liens, sell capital interests of subsidiaries, make certain investments, engage in mergers and acquisitions, purchase and sell vessels, enter into certain charters or, if an event of default has occurred, pay cash distributions. In addition, our lenders may accelerate the maturity of indebtedness under our financing agreements and foreclose on the collateral securing the indebtedness upon the occurrence of certain events of default, including our failure to comply with any of the covenants contained in our financing agreements, not rectified within the permitted time. For instance, declining vessel values could lead to a breach of covenants under our financing agreements. If we are unable to prepay, pledge additional collateral or obtain waivers from our lenders, our lenders could accelerate our debt and foreclose on our vessels. In addition, if the lenders are entitled to accelerate the debt outstanding under one facility in default, it could result in a default on our other facilities.
 
The aging of our fleet may result in increased operating costs in the future, which could adversely affect our earnings.
 
In general, the cost of maintaining a vessel in good operating condition increases with the age of the vessel. The age of our dry bulk carrier fleet is approximately threefour years. As our fleet ages, we will incur increased costs. Older vessels are typically less fuel efficient and more costly to maintain than more recently constructed vessels due to improvements in engine technology. Cargo insurance rates also increase with the age of a vessel, making older vessels less desirable to charterers. Governmental regulations, including environmental regulations, safety or other equipment standards related to the age of vessels, may require expenditures for alterations, or the addition of new equipment, to our vessels and may restrict the type of activities in which our vessels may

16



engage. As our vessels age, market conditions might not justify those expenditures or enable us to operate our vessels profitably during the remainder of their useful lives.
 
If we do not set aside funds and are unable to borrow or raise funds for vessel replacement at the end of a vessel's useful life our revenue will decline, which would adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay cash distributions.
 
If we do not set aside funds and are unable to borrow or raise funds for vessel replacement, we will be unable to replace the vessels in our fleet upon the expiration of their remaining useful lives. Our cash flows and income are dependent on the revenues earned by the chartering of our vessels. If we are unable to replace the vessels in our fleet upon the expiration of their useful lives, our business, results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay cash distributions would be adversely affected. Any funds set aside for vessel replacement will not be available for cash distributions.
 

15



We may not have adequate insurance to compensate us if our vessels are damaged or lost.
 
We procure insurance for our fleet against those risks that we believe companies in the shipping industry commonly insure. These insurances include hull and machinery insurance, protection and indemnity insurance, which include environmental damage and pollution insurance coverage, and war risk insurance. We can give no assurance that we will be adequately insured against all risks and we cannot guarantee that any particular claim will be paid, even if we have previously recorded a receivable or revenue in respect of such claim. Our insurance policies may contain deductibles for which we will be responsible and limitations and exclusions, which may increase our costs or lower our revenues.
 
We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage for our vessels in the future or renew our existing policies on the same or commercially reasonable terms, or at all. For example, more stringent environmental regulations have in the past led to increased costs for, and in the future may result in the lack of availability of, protection and indemnity insurance against risks of environmental damage or pollution. Any uninsured or underinsured loss could harm our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay cash distributions. In addition, our insurance may be voidable by the insurers as a result of certain of our actions, such as our vessels failing to maintain certification with applicable maritime self-regulatory organizations. Further, we cannot assure you that our insurance policies will cover all losses that we incur, or that disputes over insurance claims will not arise with our insurance carriers. Any claims covered by insurance would be subject to deductibles, and since it is possible that a large number of claims may be brought, the aggregate amount of these deductibles could be material. In addition, our insurance policies may be subject to limitations and exclusions, which may increase our costs or lower our revenues, thereby possibly having a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay cash distributions.
 
We may be subject to calls because we obtain some of our insurance through protection and indemnity associations.
 
We may be subject to increased premium payments, or calls, if the value of our claim records, the claim records of our fleet managers, and/or the claim records of other members of the protection and indemnity associations through which we receive insurance coverage for tort liability (including pollution-related liability) significantly exceed projected claims. In addition, our protection and indemnity associations may not have enough resources to cover claims made against them. Our payment of these calls could result in significant expense to us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and ability to pay cash distributions.

We are a holding company, and we depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute funds to us in order to satisfy our financial obligations and to make dividend payments.

We are a holding company and our subsidiaries conduct all of our operations and own all of our operating assets. We have no significant assets other than the equity interests in our subsidiaries. As a result, our ability to satisfy our financial obligations and to make dividend payments in the future depends on our subsidiaries and their ability to distribute funds to us. There are currently no material legal or economic restrictions on the ability of subsidiaries to transfer funds to us in the form of cash, dividends, loans, or advance. However, if we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries, the Board may exercise its discretion not to declare or pay dividends. We do not intend to obtain funds from other sources to pay dividends.

The international nature of our operations may make the outcome of any bankruptcy proceedings difficult to predict.

We are incorporated under the laws of Bermuda and we conduct operations in countries around the world. Consequently, in the event of any bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or similar proceeding involving us or any of our subsidiaries, bankruptcy laws other than those of the United States could apply. If we become a debtor under U.S. bankruptcy law, bankruptcy courts in the United States may seek to assert jurisdiction over all of our assets, wherever located, including property situated in other countries. There can be no assurance, however, that we would become a debtor in the United States, or that a U.S. bankruptcy court would be entitled to, or accept, jurisdiction over such a bankruptcy case, or that courts in other countries that have jurisdiction over us and our operations would recognize a U.S. bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction if any other bankruptcy court would determine it had jurisdiction.
 
Because we are a foreign corporation, you may not have the same rights that a shareholder in a United States corporation may have.
 
We are a Bermuda company. Our memorandum of association and amended and restated bye-laws and the Bermuda Companies Act 1981, as amended, govern our affairs. Class actions and derivative actions are not generally available under Bermuda law. Investors may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions by management, directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a United States jurisdiction. Under Bermuda law a director

16



generally owes a fiduciary duty only to the company; not to the company's shareholders. Our shareholders may not have a direct cause of action against our directors. In addition, Bermuda law does notOur amended and restated bye-laws provide a mechanism for ourthat the shareholders to bring a classwaive any claim or right of action lawsuit under Bermuda law. Further, ourhe may have against the directors and officers and their delegates, except in respect of fraud or dishonesty. Our amended and restated bye-laws further provide for the indemnification of our directors or officers against any liability arising out of any act or omission except for an act or omission constituting fraud dishonesty or illegality.dishonesty.
 
United States tax authorities could treat the Companyus as a "passive foreign investment company", which could have adverse United States federal income tax consequences to United States shareholders.
 

17



A foreign corporation will be treated as a "passive foreign investment company", or PFIC, for United States federal income tax purposes if either (1) at least 75% of its gross income for any taxable year consists of certain types of "passive income" or (2) at least 50% of the average value of the corporation's assets produce or are held for the production of those types of "passive income". For purposes of these tests, "passive income" includes cash distributions, interest, and gains from the sale or exchange of investment property and rents and royalties other than rents and royalties which are received from unrelated parties in connection with the active conduct of a trade or business. For purposes of these tests, income derived from the performance of services does not constitute "passive income". United States shareholders of a PFIC are subject to a disadvantageous United States federal income tax regime with respect to the distributions they receive from the PFIC and the gain, if any, they derive from the sale or other disposition of their shares in the PFIC.
 
Based on our current and proposed method of operation, we do not believe that we are haveor that Knightsbridge has been since the beginning of its 2004 taxable year, or that we will be a PFIC with respect to any taxable year. In this regard, we intend to treat the gross income we derive or are deemed to derive from our time chartering and voyage chartering activities as services income, rather than rental income. Accordingly, we believe that our income from these activities does not constitute "passive income", and the assets that we own and operate in connection with the production of that income do not constitute assets that produce, or are held for the production of, "passive income".
 
Although there is no direct legal authority under the PFIC rules addressing our method of operation there is substantial legal authority supporting our position consisting of case law and United States Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, pronouncements concerning the characterization of income derived from time charters bareboat charters and voyage charters as services income for other tax purposes. However, it should be noted that there is also authority that characterizes time charter and bareboat charter income as rental income rather than services income for other tax purposes. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the IRS or a court of law will accept our position, and there is a risk that the IRS or a court of law could determine that we are a PFIC. Moreover, no assurance can be given that we would not constitute a PFIC for any future taxable year if there were to be changes in the nature and extent of our operations.
 
If the IRS were to find that we are or have been a PFIC for any taxable year, our United States shareholders will face adverse United States federal income tax consequences. Under the PFIC rules, unless those shareholders make an election available under United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code (which election could itself have adverse consequences for such shareholders, as discussed below under "Tax Considerations-United"Taxation-United States Federal Income Tax Considerations"), such shareholders would be liable to pay United States federal income tax at the then prevailing income tax rates on ordinary income plus interest upon excess distributions and upon any gain from the disposition of our common shares, as if the excess distribution or gain had been recognized ratably over the shareholder's holding period of our common shares. Please see the section entitled "Tax Considerations-United"Taxation-United States Federal Income Tax Considerations-Passive Foreign Investment Company Status and Significant Tax Consequences" in Item 10E.. below for a more comprehensive discussion of the United States federal income tax consequences to United States shareholders if we are treated as a PFIC.
 
We may have to pay tax on United States source income, which would reduce our earnings.
 
Under the Code, 50% of the gross shipping income of a vessel owning or chartering corporation, such as ourselves and our subsidiaries, that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the United States, may be subject to a 4% United States federal income tax without allowance for deduction, unless that corporation qualifies for exemption from tax under Section 883 of the Code and the applicable Treasury regulationsRegulations promulgated thereunder.
 
We expectbelieve that we and each of our subsidiaries will qualifyqualified for this statutory tax exemption for our taxable year ending on December 31, 2014 and we will take this position for United States federal income tax return reporting purposes. However, there are factual circumstances beyond our control that could cause us to lose the benefit of this tax exemption for future taxable years and thereby become subject to United States federal income tax on our United States source shipping income. For example, we would no longer qualify for exemption under Section 883 of the Code for a particular taxable year if certain non-qualified shareholders with a 5% or greater interest in our common shares owned, in the aggregate, 50% or more of our outstanding common shares for more than half the days during the taxable year. It is possible that we could be subject to this rule for our taxable year ending on December

17



31, 2015. Due to the factual nature of the issues involved, there can be no assurances on our tax-exempt status or that of any of our subsidiaries.
 
If we or our subsidiaries are not entitled to exemption under Section 883 of the Code for any taxable year, we, or our subsidiaries, could be subject during those years to an effective 2% United States federal income tax on gross shipping income derived during such a year that is attributable to the transport of cargoes to or from the United States. The imposition of this tax would have a negative effect on our business and would result in decreased earnings available for distribution to our shareholders. However, the amount of our shipping income that would be subject to this tax has historically not been material.
 
Our share price may be highly volatile and future sales of our common stockshares could cause the market price of our common stockshares to decline.
 

18



Our common stockshares commenced trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market in February 1997 and currently trade under the symbol "VLCCF" in February 1997."GOGL". Beginning on April 7, 2015, our shares traded on the Oslo Stock Exchange under the ticker code “GOGL”. We cannot assure you that an active and liquid public market for our common stockshares will continue. The market price of our common stockshares has historically fluctuated over a wide range and may continue to fluctuate significantly in response to many factors, such as actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results, changes in financial estimates by securities analysts, economic and regulatory trends, general market conditions, rumors and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Since 2008, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. If the volatility in the market continues or worsens, it could have an adverse affecteffect on the market price of our common stockshares and impact a potential sale price if holders of our common stockshares decide to sell their shares.
 
Because our offices and most of our assets are outside the United States, you may not be able to bring suit against us, or enforce a judgment obtained against us in the United States.
 
Our executive offices, administrative activities and assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be more difficult for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon us, or to enforce both in the United States and outside the United States judgments against us in any action, including actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States.

ITEM 4.  INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A.  HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY

We are an international shipping company specializing in the transportation of dry bulk cargoes.

On September 18, 1996, we were incorporated in Bermuda under the name Knightsbridge Tankers Limited was incorporated in Bermuda as an exempted company underpursuant to the Bermuda Companies LawAct 1981. In October 2014, we changed our name to Knightsbridge Shipping Limited, and following the completion of 1981the Merger on September 18, 1996. The Company'sMarch 31, 2015, we changed our name to Golden Ocean Group Limited. Our registered and principal executive offices are located at Par-la-Ville Place, 14 Par-la-Ville Road, Hamilton, HM 08, Bermuda, and itsour telephone number at this location is +1 (441) 295-6935.
 
We are an international shipping company specializing in the transportation of dry bulk cargoes, and have been listedOur common shares commenced trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market in February 1997 and currently trade under the symbol "VLCCF" since our initial public offering"GOGL". We obtained a secondary listing on the Oslo Stock Exchange in February 1997. The CompanyApril 2015.

Knightsbridge’s Acquisitions, Disposals and Newbuildings

Knightsbridge was originally established for the purpose of owning and operating five very large crude oil carriers, or VLCCs. In February 1997, weKnightsbridge completed ourits initial public offering, which resulted in $317.2 million net proceeds to us. Weproceeds. Knightsbridge used these proceeds and bank debt to fund the acquisition of ourits initial fleet of five VLCCs. Upon their purchase from their previous owners on February 27, 1997 until March 2004, the Company chartered its vessels to Shell International on long-term bareboat charters.

In May 2007, weKnightsbridge entered into agreements for the construction of two Capesize dry bulk carriers, each with a cargo-carrying capacity of approximately 170,000 dwt, with Daehan Shipbuilding Co Ltd in the Republic of Korea. Both of the vessels commenced five-year time charters following their delivery to us in August and October 2009. dwt.

In July 2010, weKnightsbridge acquired a 2010-built Capesize dry bulk carrier from the Former Golden Ocean and in October 2010, weKnightsbridge acquired a second 2010-built Capesize dry bulk carrier from the Former Golden Ocean, a Bermuda company listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange.Ocean. Both vessels were acquired with existing time charters.


We
18



Knightsbridge sold a VLCC to an unrelated third partyparties in each of December 2007, September 2012, October 2012 and December 2012, and asrespectively. As of December 31, 2012, weKnightsbridge owned and operated one VLCC and four Capesize dry bulk carriers. The VLCC was being marketed for sale and was classified as 'held for sale' in the balance sheet at December 31, 2012. Following the sale of the three VLCCs in 2012 and the balance sheet classification of the fourth as 'held for sale', the results of the four VLCCs have been recorded as discontinued operations in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In March 2013, we agreed the sale of ourKnightsbridge sold its final VLCC, with expectedthe delivery of which took place in the second quarter ofApril 2013.

In March 2013, we also concluded twoKnightsbridge entered into newbuilding contracts for two 182,000 dwt Capesize bulk carriers with Japan Marine United Corporation, ("JMU")or JMU, and in Japan.November 2013, entered into newbuilding contracts for two 180,000 dwt Capesize bulk carriers with Daehan Shipbuilding Co. Ltd., or Daehan. The design provided by JMUof these vessels represents the next generation of Capesize bulk carriers, withincluding the latest in fuel efficiency technology, availablewith expected deliveries in order2015.

In April 2014, Knightsbridge acquired five special purpose companies, or SPCs, from Frontline 2012, each owning a fuel efficient 180,000 dwt Capesize dry bulk newbuilding. Also in April 2014, a subsidiary of Knightsbridge acquired one 2013-built Capesize dry bulk carrier, Bulk China (renamed KSL China), from Karpasia Shipping Inc., or Karpasia, a wholly owned subsidiary of Hemen. Both transactions were accounted for as a purchase of assets. Two of the five Capesize newbuildings, KSL Seattle and KSL Singapore, were delivered in May 2014 and the remaining three, KSL Sapporo, KSL Sydney and KSL Salvador, were delivered in June, July and September 2014, respectively. The 2013-built Capesize dry bulk carrier was delivered in April 2014.

In April 2014, Knightsbridge also agreed to secureacquire an additional 25 SPCs from Frontline 2012, each owning a fuel efficiency. efficient dry bulk newbuilding, or the Frontline 2012 Vessel Acquisition Transaction.

In September 2014, Knightsbridge completed the first stage of the Frontline 2012 Vessel Acquisition Transaction and issued 31.0 million shares, priced at $11.51 per share based on the closing share price on the date of the transaction, to Frontline 2012 in exchange for thirteen SPCs. Knightsbridge accounted for this transaction as a purchase of assets. Three of the thirteen newbuildings acquired in September 2014 were subsequently delivered to Knightsbridge in 2014; KSL Santiago was delivered in September 2014 and KSL San Francisco and KSL Santos were delivered in October 2014.

As of December 31, 2014, Knightsbridge owned thirteen Capesize dry bulk carriers, of which three were on index-related time charters and ten were operating in the spot market. Knightsbridge was also a party to contracts for fourteen Capesize newbuildings (including ten purchased from Frontline 2012 in September 2014), and had an agreement to purchase twelve additional Capesize newbuildings from Frontline 2012 as part of the Frontline 2012 Vessel Acquisition Transaction.

Recent Developments prior to the Merger

Five of the thirteen newbuildings acquired from Frontline 2012 in September 2014 were delivered to Knightsbridge in 2015; KSL Seoul, KSL Sakura, KSL Seville and Golden Kathrine were delivered in January 2015 and KSL Stockholm was delivered in March 2015.

In January 2015, Knightsbridge entered into an agreement with RWE Supply & Trading GmbH, or RWE, a wholly owned subsidiary of RWE AG (a major European energy company), for chartering out a total of 15 Capesize vessels on long term, index-linked contracts. Four vessels have subsequently been delivered to RWE and the remaining vessels are expected to be delivered over the next twelve months.

In February 2015, the Former Golden Ocean, Bocimar International NV, CTM, Golden Union Shipping Co S.A., and Star Bulk Carriers Corp announced the formation of a new joint venture company, Capesize Chartering Ltd. The new company will combine and coordinate the chartering services of all the parties. Capesize Chartering Ltd. commenced operations in the second half of February 2015 from the existing offices of each of the five parties involved.

In February 2015, an agreement was signed between Knightsbridge (as guarantor), various SPCs (as borrowers), a syndicate of banks and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. as agent for a senior secured post-delivery term loan facility of up to $425.0 million to partially finance 14 newbuilding vessels. The facility is divided into 12 tranches of $30.0 million and two tranches of $32.5 million. Each tranche is repayable in consecutive quarterly installments commencing three months after draw down with a twenty year profile, with all amounts required to be fully repaid by March 31, 2021. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin. The loan agreement contains a cross default provision and financial covenants, including free cash of a certain amount, a requirement for positive working capital and a value adjusted equity to adjusted total assets ratio.

In March 2015, Knightsbridge completed the second stage of the Frontline 2012 Vessel Transaction by issuing 31.0 million shares, priced at $4.10 per share based on the closing share price on the date of the transaction, to Frontline 2012 and assuming newbuilding

19



commitments of $404.0 million, net of a cash payment from Frontline 2012 of $108.6 million. No other working capital balances were acquired.

As of March 31, 2015, and just prior to the Merger described below, Knightsbridge owned 18 Capesize dry bulk carriers of which three were on index-related time charters and fifteen were operating in the spot market. Knightsbridge also had contracts for 21 Capesize newbuildings (including 17 purchased from Frontline 2012).

The Merger

On October 7, 2014, Knightsbridge and the Former Golden Ocean entered into the Merger. The Merger was approved by the shareholders of Knightsbridge and the Former Golden Ocean at separate special general meetings held on March 26, 2015. In addition, at the special general meeting of Knightsbridge shareholders, the Amended and Restated Bye-laws were adopted and the name of the post-Merger company was changed to Golden Ocean Group Limited. The Merger will be accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting under the provisions of ASC 805, with Knightsbridge selected as the accounting acquirer under this guidance.

The Merger was completed on March 31, 2015 and shareholders in the Former Golden Ocean received 61.5 million shares of Knightsbridge as merger consideration, with one share in the Former Golden Ocean receiving 0.13749 shares of Knightsbridge. Prior to completion of the Merger, Knightsbridge had 111,231,678 common shares outstanding.

Following completion of the Merger and, pursuant to the merger agreement, the cancellation of 51,498 common shares (which were held by the Former Golden Ocean) and the cancellation of 4,543 common shares (which account for the fractional shares that will not be distributed to the Former Golden Ocean shareholders as merger consideration), Golden Ocean has 172,765,637 common shares outstanding. Trading in our shares commenced on the Oslo Stock Exchange on April 1, 2015 under the ticker code "VLCCF". Beginning on April 7, 2015, our shares traded on the Oslo Stock Exchange under the ticker code “GOGL”. Our common shares began trading under our new name and ticker symbol “GOGL” on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on April 1, 2015.

As of March 31, 2015, and following completion of the Merger, we own 47 vessels and have 25 newbuildings under construction. In addition, we have four vessels chartered-in and one vessel owned through a joint venture. Six of the vessels are chartered out on fixed rate time charters and the remainder operate in the spot market or are fixed on index-linked time charter contracts.

Recent Developments following the Merger

In April 2015, we agreed to the sale of two vessels, Channel Alliance and Channel Navigator, which were acquired as a result of the Merger, to an unrelated third party.The vessels are expected to be delivered duringto the buyer by the end of June 2015.

While our operating fleet currently consistsIn April 2015, we agreed to the sale of four newbuilding Capesize dry bulk carriers, our long term strategy is stillvessels, which were owned by us prior to invest in dry bulk and tanker tonnage. Our current fleet composition reflects our board's viewthe completion of the current market conditions. The Golden Future is on a time charter for a minimum period of 11 monthsMerger and a maximum period of 13 monthsare currently under construction at a market index based daily rate. The Battersea is employed on a short term time charterChinese yard. We will complete the construction of these newbuildings and each vessel is expected to be redelivereddelivered to the buyer following its delivery to us (two in 2015 and two in 2016). We will time charter-in three of the second quartervessels for periods between six and twelve months.

In April 2015, we agreed to a sale and leaseback transaction with Ship Finance for eight Capesize vessels. Five of 2013.these vessels (KSL China, Battersea, Belgravia, Golden Future and Golden Zhejiang) were owned by us prior to the completion of the Merger and three vessels (Golden Zhoushan, Golden Beijing and Golden Magnum) were acquired as a result of the Merger. These vessels were built in Korea and China between 2009 and 2013 and will be sold en-bloc for an aggregate price of $272.0 million or $34.0 million per vessel on average. $192.8 million of the sale proceeds will be used to repay debt. The Belgravia is employedvessels are expected to be delivered to Ship Finance in July 2015, subject to customary closing conditions. The vessels will be time chartered-in by one of our subsidiaries for a period of 10 years. The daily time charter rate will be $17,600 during the first seven years and $14,900 thereafter. In addition, 33% of our profit from revenues above the daily time charter rate will be calculated and paid on a long term time charterquarterly basis to Ship Finance. We will have a purchase option of $112 million en-bloc after 10 years and, if such option is not exercised, Ship Finance will have the option to extend the charters by 3 years at $14,900 per day.

In April 2015, we have reached agreements with expiryseveral of our yards to delay the delivery dates of 17 newbuildings by 73 months in aggregate. These changes resulted in an increase in newbuilding commitments of $1.1 million such that, as of the third quarterdate of 2014this annual report, we are committed to make newbuilding installments of $936.6 million with expected payments of $330.7 million, $471.4 million and the Golden Zhejiang is employed on a time charter for a minimum period of eight months$134.5 million in 2015, 2016 and a maximum period of ten months.2017, respectively.

B.  BUSINESS OVERVIEW

We currently own and operate, through our subsidiaries, a fleet of four Capesize dry bulk carriers with a total carrying capacity of approximately 0.7 million dwt. All of our vessels are currently employed under fixed-rate period charters. We have also concluded

1920



newbuilding contracts for two 182,000 dwt Capesize bulk carriers, which are expected to be delivered to us in 2015. The following table sets forth summary information concerning the vessels we own and operate as of the date of this annual report: Our Reporting Segment

Vessel Name 
Vessel
Type
 Size (dwt) Year Built 
Charter
Type
 
Daily
Gross
Hire Rate
 
Earliest
Redelivery
Date
Belgravia Capesize 170,500 2009 Time Charter 
$46,412 (1)
 August 2014
             
Battersea (2)
 Capesize 170,500 2009 Time Charter $7,350 April 2013
             
Golden Future Capesize 176,000 2010 Time Charter 
Index (3)
 December 2013
             
Golden Zhejiang (4)
   Capesize 176,000 2010 Time Charter $9,500 October 2013
(1)In March 2012, the Company agreed an amendment to the time charter with Jiangsu Shagang Group Co., Ltd ("Shagang") whereby (i) the sum of $95,000 was to be deducted by Shagang from each future charter hire payment, which are each payable 15 days in advance, until the amount of $5.7 million has been deducted, and (ii) the sum of $5.0 million was to be paid in advance by Shagang. The daily gross hire rate was reduced from $52,670 to $46,412 as a result of this amendment.
(2)In July 2012, the charterer of the Battersea, Sanko Steamship Co., Ltd., or Sanko, redelivered the vessel prior to the expiration of the minimum period of the charter, and the vesselWe operated in the spot market until September 2012.
(3)The rate is calculated in arrears every 14 days as the aggregate of the actual daily rates per the Baltic Exchange for that 14 day period. This charter commenced in January 2013.
(4)In July 2012, the charterer of the Golden Zhejiang, Hong Xiang Shipping Holding (Hong Kong) Co Limited, or Hong Xiang, redelivered the vessel before the final maturity of the charter, and the vessel operated in the spot market until September 2012.
The Company operated in two markets from 2009 through 2012; the tanker and dry bulk carrier markets as an international provider of seaborne transportation of crude oil and dry bulk cargoes. Following the sale of three VLCCs during 2012 and the balance sheet classification of the fourth as 'held for sale', at December 31, 2012, the results of the four VLCCs, which operated in the tanker market, have been recorded as discontinued operations. An analysis of our revenues from continuing operations is as follows:
(in thousands of $) 2012
 2011
 2010
 2014
 2013
 2012
Total operating revenues – dry bulk carrier market 37,315
 55,497
 40,825
 96,715
 37,546
 37,315

The Company'sOur vessels operate worldwide and thereforeas a result, our management does not, and Knightsbridge's management did not, evaluate performance by geographical region asbecause this information is not meaningful.
 
Our principal executive offices are located at Par-la-Ville Place, 14 Par-la-Ville Road in Hamilton, HM 08, Bermuda.

Business Strategy

Our business strategy is to operate a diversified fleet of VLCCs and Capesize dry bulk carriers with flexibility to adjust our exposure to the tanker and dry bulk marketsmarket depending on existing factors such as charter rates, newbuilding costs, vessel resale and scrap values and vessel operating expenses resulting from, among other things, changes in the supply of and demand for tanker and dry bulk capacity. We may adjust our exposure through time charters, bareboat charters, sale and leasebacks, sales and purchases of vessels, newbuilding contracts and acquisitions. Our intention is to renew and grow our fleet through selective acquisitions. The current composition of of our fleet and order book and recent disposals reflect market conditions and the board's view on the markets.
 
Our goal is to generate competitive returns for our shareholders. Our cash distribution policy is to declare quarterly cash distributions to shareholders, substantially equal to or at times greater than net operational cash flow in the reporting quarter less reserves that ourthe Board may from time to time determine are necessary, such as reserves for drydocking and other possible cash needs. We intend to finance our future vessel acquisitions not from our cash flow from operations, but from external sources, such as by undertaking equity offerings incurringand additional indebtedness in line with our current low-leverage capital structure and utilizing the proceeds from the sale of our vessels.indebtedness.

20



 
There is no guarantee that our shareholders will receive quarterly cash distributions from us. Our cash distribution policy may be changed at any time at the sole discretion of ourthe Board, who will take into account, among other things, our contingent liabilities,newbuilding commitments, financial condition and future prospects, the terms of our credit facilities, and the requirements of Bermuda law in determining the timing and amount of cash distributions, if any, that we may pay. For example, Knightsbridge’s board of directors, or the Knightsbridge Board, decided not to declare a dividend for the fourth quarter of 2014 due to the market environment.

Management Structure

Our Board decided, atOverall responsibility for the incorporationoversight of the Company, to contract for the day-to-day management services of the Companyour company and its subsidiaries rather thanwill rest with the Board. We plan to establish a proprietaryoperate management organization. This policy was based on the availability of such services through our subsidiary incorporated in the market on terms which we consider more cost efficientBermuda, Golden Ocean Group Management (Bermuda) Ltd., who in turn will subcontract services to us than the alternative.Golden Ocean Management AS and Golden Ocean Management Asia Pte Ltd., subsidiaries incorporated in Norway and Singapore, respectively. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer are employed by Golden Ocean Management AS. The Board has not seen any reasonplans to change this policy since it was formulated. Alldefine the scope and terms of the management services contracted forto be provided, including day-to-day operations, by the Companyaforementioned subsidiaries, and its subsidiaries are subject to the Board's or, as the case maywill require that it be the board of the relevant subsidiary's, sole right to determine the overall objectives and policies of the Company and its subsidiaries. Further,consulted on all matters of material importance to and/or of an extraordinaryunusual nature in respect ofand, for such matters, will provide specific authorization to personnel to act on our business are decided by the Board.

General Management Agreementbehalf.

We are provided withcurrently receive general administrative services byfrom ICB Shipping (Bermuda) Limited, or the General Manager. The General Manager, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Frontline. The General Manager subcontracts the services provided to the Company and its subsidiaries to Frontline Management (Bermuda) Limited, another wholly owned subsidiary of Frontline. Pursuant to the terms of the Amended General Management Agreement with our General Manager effective April 2, 2010, the General Manager is entitled to a management fee of $2.3 million per annum from January 1, 2010, which is subject to annual adjustments, plus a commission of 1.25% on gross freight revenues from our tanker vessels, 1% of proceeds on the sale of any of our vessels, and 1% of the cost of the purchase of vessels. In addition, we, in our discretion, may award equity incentives to the General Manager based upon its performance. Such awards are subject to the approval of our Board. We are responsible for paying all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the General Manager from third parties in connection with the services provided under the Amended General Management Agreement, such as audit, legal and other professional fees, registration fees and directors' and officers' fees and expenses. Our Board believes that the terms of the Amended General Management Agreement are substantially similar to those that we might have obtained in arm's-length negotiations in the market. We may terminate the Amended General Management Agreement subject to five business days' prior written notice to the General Manager in the event:

the General Manager commits a material breach under the Amended General Management Agreement, and such breach remains unremedied for 30 days;
any material consent, authorization, license, approval or similar requirement for the General Manager's activities as such is modified, terminated, revoked or expires;
it becomes unlawful for the General Manager to perform the services to be provided under the terms of the Amended General Management Agreement; or
the General Manager ceases to be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Frontline.
The General Manager may terminate the Amended General Management Agreement upon five business days' notice in the event we commit a material breach of the terms thereof and the breach remains unremedied for 30 days. Either party may terminate the Amended General Management Agreement upon immediate written notice to the other party in the event such other party becomes subject to an insolvency event. Either party may terminate the Amended General Management Agreement upon 12 months' prior written notice to the other party, provided that such termination by us must be approved by a resolution duly adopted by the affirmative vote of shareholders holding at least 66 2/3% of our issued and outstanding common shares. Our Board believes that if the Amended General Management Agreement is terminated, we will be able to obtain appropriate alternative arrangements for our management requirements. However, there can be no assurance that such alternative arrangement would not cause us to incur additional expenses.

Technical Management of Vessels

The technical management of our vessels is provided by ship mangers subcontracted by ourthe General Manager.
Commercial Management of our Capesize Vessels

21



PursuantManager and pursuant to a commercial management agreement, or the Dry bulkBulk Commercial Management Agreement, Golden Ocean Group Management (Bermuda) Ltd., or the Dry bulkBulk Manager, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Golden Ocean, manages our dry bulk carriers. The Dry bulk Manager may subcontract some or allAs a result of the Merger, we plan to review the services provided to usperformed by the General Manager and our subsidiaries to its affiliates or third parties. Pursuant to the Dry bulk Commercial Management Agreement,Bulk Manager (which is now our wholly-owned subsidiary).

For more information on our agreements with the General Manager and the Dry bulkBulk Manager, is entitled to receiveplease see “Item - Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions - B. Related Party Transactions”.

Capesize Chartering Ltd.

In February 2015, the Former Golden Ocean, Bocimar International NV, CTM, Golden Union Shipping Co S.A., and Star Bulk Carriers Corp. announced the formation of a commission of 1.25%new joint venture company, Capesize Chartering Ltd. The new company will combine and coordinate the chartering services of all gross freight earned by our dry bulk carriers. In addition, we, in our discretion, may award equity incentives to the Dry bulk Manager based on its performance. Such awards are subject to the approval of our Board. We or the Dry bulk Manager may terminate the Dry bulk Commercial Management Agreement subject to three months' prior written notice to the other party.

Furthermore, we may terminate the Dry bulk Commercial Management Agreement with immediate effectparties. Capesize Chartering Ltd commenced operations in the eventsecond half of

21



February 2015 from the Dry bulk Manager commits a material breachexisting offices of each of the terms thereof andfive parties involved. Following the breach remains unremedied for 14 days after written notice thereof has been provided by us to the Dry bulk Manager. In addition, either party may terminate the Dry bulk Commercial Management Agreement upon immediate written notice to the other party in the event that such other party becomes subject to an insolvency event. Our Board believes that, in the case of any terminationcompletion of the Dry bulk Commercial Management Agreement, we can obtain appropriate alternative arrangements forMerger, our commercial management requirements. However, there canCapesize spot trading vessels will be no assurance that such alternative arrangements would not cause us to incur additional expenses.marketed by the joint venture.

Seasonality
 
The dry bulk trade also has a history of tracking seasonal demand fluctuations, but like the oil trade,this appears to have become less dependent on such fluctuations as a result of the increased transportation of certain dry bulk commodities. AdverseIn the last few years, adverse weather conditions in the Southern Hemisphere, however, which often occur during the first quarter, have had a negative impact on iron ore and coal exports from Australia and iron ore exports from Brazil in the last few years. Brazil.

Grain has traditionally had the greatest impact on the dry bulk market, particularly during the peak demand seasons, which occuroccurs during the second quarter in the Southern Hemisphere and at the end of the third quarter and throughout the fourth quarter in the Northern Hemisphere. The growth of iron ore and coal transportation over the last decade, however, has diminished the relative importance of grain to the dry bulk transportation industry. With the quarterly pricing ofSince iron ore, affecting its demandlike most other commodities, has moved from fixed price agreements between shippers and receivers to spot pricing, short term price fluctuations have had an impact on iron ore trading by reducing normal seasonal patterns. Other factors, however, such as weather and port congestion impacting the dry bulk industry as a whole, the volatility of dry bulk earnings in recent years appears to be the result of factors other than seasonality.

Historically, oil trade and, therefore, charter rates increased in the winter months and eased in the summer months as demand for oil in the Northern Hemisphere rose in colder weather and fell in warmer weather. The tanker industry, in general, has become less dependent on the seasonal transport of heating oil than a decade ago as new uses for oil and oil products have developed, spreading consumption more evenly over the year. This is most apparent from the higher seasonal demand during the summer months due to energy requirements for air conditioning and motor vehicles.still impact market volatility.

Customers
 
Our customers include major oil companies, tanker companies, dry bulk companies, petroleum and dry bulk product traders, government agencies and various other entities. Revenues from three customers in the year ended December 31, 2014 each accounted for three10 percent or more of Knightsbridge's consolidated revenues from discontinued and continuing operations, in the amount of $8.2 million, $8.0 million, and $7.9 million, respectively.

Revenues from three customers in the year ended December 31, 2013 each accounted for 10 percent or more of Knightsbridge's consolidated revenues from discontinued and continuing operations, in the amount of $17.0 million, $5.0 million and $4.3 million, respectively.

Revenues from three customers in the year ended December 31, 2012 each accounted for 10 percent or more of the Company's consolidatedKnightsbridge's consolidation revenues from discontinued and continuing operations, in the amountsamount of $17.4 million, $11.6 million and $5.1$5.1 million,, respectively. Revenues from six customers in the year ended December 31, 2011 each accounted for 10 percent or more of the Company's consolidated revenues from discontinued and continuing operations, in the amounts of $19.2 million, $16.1 million, $14.7 million, $11.6 million, $11.6 million and $10.0 million, respectively. Revenues from three customers in the year ended December 31, 2010 each accounted for 10 percent or more of the Company's consolidation revenues from discontinued and continuing operations, in the amounts of $28.0 million, $19.1 million and $14.6 million, respectively.

Competition

The market for international seaborne crude oil and dry bulk transportation services is highly fragmented and competitive. Seaborne crude oil transportation services generally are provided by two main types of operators: major oil company captive fleets (both private and state-owned) and independent ship-owner fleets while seaborne dry bulk transportation services are generally provided by independent ship-owner fleets. In addition, many owners and operators in each of the tanker and dry bulk industriessector pool their vessels together on an ongoing basis, and such pools are available to customers to the same extent as independently owned and operated fleets. Many major oil companies and other oil trading companies, the primary charterers of the tankers owned or controlled by us, also operate their own vessels and use those vessels not only to transport their own crude oil but also to transport crude oil for third party end-users in direct competition with independent owners and operators in the tanker charter market. Competition for charters in the tanker and dry bulk marketsmarket is intense and is based upon price, location, size, age, condition and acceptability

22



of the vessel and its manager. Competition is also affected by the availability of other size vessels to compete in the trades in which we engage. Charters are to a large extent brokered through international independent brokerage houses that specialize in finding the optimal ship for any particular cargo based on the aforementioned criteria. Brokers may be appointed by the cargo shipper or the ship owner.
 
Environmental and Other Regulations

Government regulations and laws significantly affect the ownership and operation of our vessels. We are subject to international conventions, national, state and local laws and regulations in force in the countries in which our vessels may operate or are registered and compliance with such laws, regulations and other requirements may entail significant expense.

Our vessels are subject to both scheduled and unscheduled inspections by a variety of government, quasi-governmental and private organizations including local port authorities, national authorities, harbor masters or equivalents, classification societies, flag state administrations (countries of registry) and charterers. Our failure to maintain permits, licenses, certificates or other approvals required by some of these entities could require us to incur substantial costs or temporarily suspend operation of one or more of our vessels.

We believe that the heightened levels of environmental and quality concerns among insurance underwriters, regulators and charterers have led to greater inspection and safety requirements on all vessels and may accelerate the scrapping of older vessels throughout the industry. Increasing environmental concerns have created a demand for vessels that conform to stricter environmental standards.  We believe that the operation of our vessels is in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and

22



regulations and that our vessels have all material permits, licenses, certificates or other authorizations necessary for the conduct of our operations; however, because such laws and regulations are frequently changed and may impose increasingly stricter requirements, we cannot predict with certainty the ultimate cost of complying with these requirements, or the impact of these requirements on the resale value or useful lives of our vessels. In addition, a future serious marine incident that results in significant oil pollution or otherwise causes significant adverse environmental impact such as the 2010 BP plc Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, could result in additional legislation or regulation that could negatively affect our profitability.
 
International Maritime Organization

The International Maritime Organization, or the IMO, is the United Nations agency for maritime safety and the prevention of pollution by ships.  The IMO has adopted several international conventions that regulate the international shipping industry, including but not limited to the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage of 1969, amended and replaced by the 1992 protocol, generally referred to as CLC, the InternationalBunker Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage of 2001, and the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships of 1973, or theMARPOL. MARPOL Convention. The MARPOL Convention is broken into six Annexes, each of which establishes environmental standards relating to different sources of pollution: Annex I relates to oil leakage or spilling; Annexes II and III relate to harmful substances carried, in bulk, in liquid or packaged form, respectively; Annexes IV and V relate to sewage and garbage management, respectively; and Annex VI relates to air emissions.

The operation of our vessels is also affected by the requirements contained in the International Safety Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention, or ISM Code, promulgated by the IMO under the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea of 1974, or SOLAS. The ISM Code requires the party with operational control of a vessel to develop an extensive safety management system that includes, among other things, the adoption of a safety and environmental protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for operating its vessels safely and describing procedures for responding to emergencies. We intend to rely upon the safety management system that our appointed ship managers have developed.

Noncompliance with the ISM Code or with other IMO regulations may subject a shipowner or bareboat charterer to increased liability, may lead to decreases in available insurance coverage for affected vessels and may result in the denial of access to, or detention in, some ports including United States and European Union ports.
 
United States

The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990 and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

The U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, established an extensive regulatory and liability regime for environmental protection and cleanup of oil spills. OPA affects all "owners and operators" whose vessels trade with the United States or its territories or possessions, or whose vessels operate in the waters of the United States, which include the U.S. territorial sea and the 200 nautical mile exclusive economic zone around the United States. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability

23



Act, or CERCLA, imposes liability for cleanup and natural resource damage from the release of hazardous substances (otherother than oil)oil, except in limited circumstances, whether on land or at sea.  OPA and CERCLA both define "owner and operator" in the case of a vessel as any person owning, operating or chartering by demise, the vessel.  Accordingly, both OPA and CERCLA impact our operations.

Under OPA, vessel owners and operators are responsible parties who are jointly, severally and strictly liable (unless the spill results solely from the act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all containment and clean-up costs and other damages arising from oil spills from their vessels. OPA contains statutory caps on liability and damages; such caps do not apply to direct cleanup costs.  OPA limits the liability of responsible parties with respect to tankers over 3,000 gross tons (other than single-hull tankers) to the greater of $2,000 per gross ton or $17.088 million.million per double hull tanker, and with respect to non-tank vessels, the greater of $1,000 per gross ton or $854,000 for any non-tank vessel, respectively (subject to periodic adjustment for inflation).  These limits of liability do not apply if an incident was proximately caused by the violation of an applicable U.S. federal safety, construction or operating regulation by a responsible party (or its agent, employee or a person acting pursuant to a contractual relationship), or a responsible party's gross negligence or willful misconduct.  The limitation on liability similarly does not apply if the responsible party fails or refuses to (i) report the incident where the responsible party knows or has reason to know of the incident; (ii) reasonably cooperate and assist as requested in connection with oil removal activities; or (iii) without sufficient cause, comply with an order issued under the Federal Water Pollution Act (Section 311 (c), (e)) or the Intervention on the High Seas Act.

OPA permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, provided they accept, at a minimum, the levels of liability established under OPA. Some states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited liability for discharge of pollutants within their waters, however, in some cases, states which have enacted this type of legislation have not yet issued implementing regulations defining tanker owners' responsibilities under these laws.

The 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico may also result in additional regulatory initiatives or statutes, including the raising of liability caps under OPA.  For example, effective October 22, 2012, the U.S. Bureau of Safety and Environment Enforcement (BSEE) implemented a final drilling safety rule for offshore oil and gas operations that strengthens the requirements for safety equipment, well control systems, and blowout prevention practices. Compliance with any new requirements of OPA may substantially impact our cost of operations or require us to incur additional expenses to comply with any new regulatory initiatives or statutes.


23



CERCLA contains a similar liability regime whereby owners and operators of vessels are liable for cleanup, removal and remedial costs, as well as damage for injury to, or destruction or loss of, natural resources, including the reasonable costs associated with assessing same, and health assessments or health effects studies.  There is no liability if the discharge of a hazardous substance results solely from the act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war.  Liability under CERCLA is limited to the greater of $300 per gross ton or $5 million for vessels carrying a hazardous substance as cargo and the greater of $300 per gross ton or $500,000 for any other vessel.  These limits do not apply (rendering the responsible person liable for the total cost of response and damages) if the release or threat of release of a hazardous substance resulted from willful misconduct or negligence, or the primary cause of the release was a violation of applicable safety, construction or operating standards or regulations.  The limitation on liability also does not apply if the responsible person fails or refuses to provide all reasonable cooperation and assistance as requested in connection with response activities where the vessel is subject to OPA.

OPA and CERCLA have no effect on the availability of damages under existing law, including maritime tort law. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with OPA, CERCLA and all applicable state regulations in the ports where our vessels call.

OPA and CERCLA both require owners and operators of vessels to establish and maintain with the U.S. Coast GuardUSCG evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet the maximum amount of liability to which the particular responsible person may be subject. Vessel owners and operators may satisfy their financial responsibility obligations by providing a proof of insurance, a surety bond, qualification as a self-insurer or a guarantee. Under OPA and CERCLA, an owner or operator of more than one tanker is required to demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility for the entire fleet in an amount equal only to the financial responsibility requirement of the tanker having the greatest maximum liability. We have provided such evidence and received certificates of financial responsibility from the U.S. Coast GuardUSCG for each of our vessels required to have one.

Other U.S. Environmental Initiatives

The U.S. Clean Water Act, or CWA, prohibits the discharge of oil, hazardous substances and ballast water in U.S. navigable waters unless authorized by a duly-issued permit or exemption, and imposes strict liability in the form of penalties for any unauthorized discharges. The CWA also imposes substantial liability for the costs of removal, remediation and damages and complements the remedies available under OPA and CERCLA. Furthermore, many U.S. states that border a navigable waterway have enacted environmental pollution laws that impose strict liability on a person for removal costs and damages resulting from a discharge of oil or a release of a hazardous substance. These laws may be more stringent than U.S. federal law.


24



The United States Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA has enacted rules requiring a permit regulating ballast water discharges and other discharges incidental to the normal operation of certain vessels within United States waters under the Vessel General Permit for Discharges Incidental to the Normal Operation of Vessels, or VGP. For a new vessel delivered to an owner or operator after September 19, 2009 to be covered by the VGP, the owner must submit a Notice of Intent, or NOI, at least 30 days before the vessel operates in United States waters. TheOn March 28, 2013, EPA has proposed a draftre-issued the VGP for another five years; this 2013 VGP to replace the current VGP upon its expiration ontook effect December 19, 2013. The 2013 authorizing discharges incidental to operations of commercial vessels. The draft permit alsoVGP contains numeric ballast water discharge limits for most vessels to reduce the risk of invasive species in US waters, more stringent requirements for exhaust gas scrubbers and the use of environmentally acceptable lubricants.

Compliance with the VGP could require the installation of equipment on our vessels to treat ballast water before it is discharged or the implementation of other disposal arrangements, and/or otherwise restrict our vessels from entering United States waters. In addition, certain statesWe have enacted more stringent discharge standards as conditions to their required certification of the VGP. We submitsubmitted NOIs for our vessels where required and do not believe that the costs associated with obtaining and complying with the VGP will have a material impact on our operations.

U.S. Coast GuardUSCG regulations adopted under the U.S. National Invasive Species Act, or the NISA, also impose mandatory ballast water management practices for all vessels equipped with ballast water tanks entering or operating in U.S. waters. As of June 21, 2012, the U.S. Coast Guard implemented revised regulations on ballast water management by establishing standards on the allowable concentration of living organisms in ballast water discharged from ships in U.S. waters. The revised ballast water standards are consistent with those adopted by the IMO in 2004.  Compliance with the EPA and the U.S. Coast Guard regulations couldwaters, which require the installation of certain engineering equipment and water treatment systems to treat ballast water before it is discharged in U.S. waters or, in the alternative, the implementation of other port facility disposal arrangements or procedures at potentially substantial cost, or may otherwise restrict our vesselsprocedures. Vessels not complying with these regulations are restricted from entering U.S. waters. The USCG must approve any technology before it is placed on a vessel

At the international level, the IMO adopted anthe International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments, in February 2004, or the BWM Convention.Convention, in February 2004. The BWM Convention providesConvention's implementing regulations call for a phased introduction of mandatory ballast water exchange requirements, to be replaced in time with mandatory concentration limits. The BWM Convention will not enter into forcebecome effective until 12 months after it has been adopted by 30 states, the combined merchant fleets of which represent not less than 35% of the gross tonnage of the world's merchant shipping. To date, there has not been sufficient adoption of this standard for it to take force. However, Panama may adopt this standardMany of the implementation dates in the relatively near future, whichBWM Convention have already passed, so that once the BWM Convention enters into force, the period of installation of mandatory ballast wager exchange requirements would be sufficientextremely short, with several thousand ships a year needing to install ballast water management systems, or BWMS. For this reason, on December 4, 2013, the IMO Assembly passed a resolution revising the application dates of the BWM Convention so that they are triggered by the entry into force date and not the dates originally in the BWM Convention. This, in effect, makes all vessels constructed before the entry into force date “existing vessels” and allows for it to take force.  Uponthe installation of a BWMS on such vessels

24



at the first renewal survey following entry into force of the BWM Convention,Convention. Once mid-ocean ballast water exchange would beor ballast water treatment system requirements become mandatory, and the cost of compliance could increase for ocean carriers. Although we do not believe that the costs of such compliance with a mandatory mid-ocean ballast exchange would be material, it is difficult to predict the overall impact of such a requirement on our operations.
 
The U.S. Clean Air Act, or the CAA, including its amendments of 1977 and 1990, requires the EPA to promulgate standards applicable to emissions of volatile organic compounds and other air contaminants. Our vessels are subject to vapor control and recovery requirements for certain cargoes when loading, unloading, ballasting, cleaning and conducting other operations in regulated port areas. Our vessels that operate in such port areas with restricted cargoes are equipped with vapor recovery systems that satisfy these requirements. The CAA also requires states to draft State Implementation Plans, or SIPs, designed to attain national health-based air quality standards in each State. Although state-specific, SIPs may include regulations concerning emissions resulting from vessel loading and unloading operations by requiring the installation of vapor control equipment. As indicated above, our vessels operating in covered port areas are already equipped with vapor recovery systems that satisfy these existing requirements.

Compliance with thefuture EPA and the U.S. Coast GuardUSCG regulations could require the installation of certain engineering equipment and water treatment systems to treat ballast water before it is discharged or the implementation of other port facility disposal arrangements or procedures at potentially substantial cost, or may otherwise restrict our vessels from entering U.S. waters.

European Union

In October 2009, the European Union amended a directive to impose criminal sanctions for illicit ship-source discharges of polluting substances, including minor discharges, if committed with intent, recklessly or with serious negligence and the discharges individually or in the aggregate result in deterioration of the quality of water. Aiding and abetting the discharge of a polluting substance may also lead to criminal penalties. Member States were required to enact laws or regulations to comply with the directive by the end of 2010. Criminal liability for pollution may result in substantial penalties or fines and increased civil liability claims.

The European Union has adopted several regulations and directives requiring, among other things, more frequent inspections of high-risk ships, as determined by type, age, and flag as well as the number of times the ship has been detained. The European Union also adopted and then extended a ban on substandard ships and enacted a minimum ban period and a definitive ban for

25



repeated offenses. The regulation also provided the European Union with greater authority and control over classification societies, by imposing more requirements on classification societies and providing for fines or penalty payments for organizations that failed to comply.

Greenhouse Gas Regulation

Currently, the emissions of greenhouse gases from ships shipping are not subject to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, which entered into force in 2005 and pursuant to which adopting countries have been required to implement national programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

As of January 1, 2013, all ships must comply with mandatory requirements adopted by the MEPC in July 2011 relating to greenhouse gas emissions. All ships are required to follow the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plans.Plans, or SEEMP. Now the minimum energy efficiency levels per capacity mile, outlined in the Energy Efficiency Design Index, or EEDI, applies to all new ships. These requirements could cause us to incur additional compliance costs. The IMO is also considering the implementation of market-based mechanisms to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from ships at an upcoming MEPC session. The European Union has indicatedParliament and Council of Ministers are expected to endorse regulations that it intends to propose an expansion of the existing European Union emissions trading scheme to include emissionswould require monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gases from marine vessels, and in January 2012 the European Commission launched a public consultation on possible measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from ships.2015. In the United States, the EPA has issued a finding that greenhouse gases endanger the public health and safety and has adopted regulations to limit greenhouse gas emissions from certain mobile sources and large stationary sources. AlthoughThe EPA enforces both the mobile source emissions regulations do not apply to greenhouse gas emissions from vessels, such regulation of vessels is foreseeable,CAA and the EPA hasinternational standards found in recent years received petitions fromAnnex VI of MARPOL concerning marine diesel emissions, and the California Attorney General and various environmental groups seeking such regulation.sulphur content found in marine fuel. Any passage of climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives by the IMO, European Union, the U.S. or other countries where we operate, or any treaty adopted at the international level to succeed the Kyoto Protocol, that restrict emissions of greenhouse gases could require us to make significant financial expenditures, including capital expenditures to upgrade our vessels, which we cannot predict with certainty at this time.

International Labor Organization

The International Labour Organization, (ILO)or ILO, is a specialized agency of the UN with headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland. The ILO has adopted the Maritime Labor Convention 2006, (MLC 2006).or MLC 2006. A Maritime Labor Certificate and a Declaration of Maritime Labor Compliance will be required to ensure compliance with the MLC 2006 for all ships above 500 gross tons in international trade. The MLC 2006 will enter into force one year after 30 countries with a minimum of 33% of the world's tonnage have ratified it. On August 20, 2012, the required number of countries met and MLC 2006 is expected to comeentered into force on August 20, 2013. The ratification of MLC 2006 maycould require us to develop new procedures to ensure full compliance.The International Group of P&I Clubs liaise with States Parties to the MLC and has agreed to provide sufficient evidence of compliance with the MLC financial security provisions prior entry into force.its requirements.

Vessel Security Regulations


25



Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there have been a variety of initiatives intended to enhance vessel security.  On November 25, 2002, the U.S. Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002, or the MTSA, came into effect.  To implement certain portions of the MTSA, in July 2003, the U.S. Coast GuardUSCG issued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.  The regulations also impose requirements on certain ports and facilities, some of which are regulated by the EPA.

Similarly, in December 2002, amendments to SOLAS created a new chapter of the convention dealing specifically with maritime security.  The new Chapter V became effective in July 2004 and imposes various detailed security obligations on vessels and port authorities, and mandates compliance with the International Ship and Port Facilities Security Code, or ISPS Code.  The ISPS Code is designed to enhance the security of ports and ships against terrorism.  Amendments to SOLAS Chapter VII, made mandatory in 2004, apply to vessels transporting dangerous goods and require those vessels be in compliance with the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code, or IMDG Code.
 
To trade internationally, a vessel must attain an International Ship Security Certificate, or ISSC, from a recognized security organization approved by the vessel's flag state. Among the various requirements are:

on-board installation of automatic identification systems to provide a means for the automatic transmission of safety-related information from among similarly equipped ships and shore stations, including information on a ship's identity, position, course, speed and navigational status;
on-board installation of ship security alert systems, which do not sound on the vessel but only alert the authorities on shore;
the development of vessel security plans;
ship identification number to be permanently marked on a vessel's hull;

26



a continuous synopsis record kept onboard showing a vessel's history, including the name of the ship, the state whose flag the ship is entitled to fly, the date on which the ship was registered with that state, the ship's identification number, the port at which the ship is registered and the name of the registered owner(s) and their registered address; and
compliance with flag state security certification requirements.

A ship operating without a valid certificate, may be detained at port until it obtains an ISSC, or it may be expelled from port, or refused entry at port.

The U.S. Coast GuardUSCG regulations, intended to align with international maritime security standards, exempt from the MTSA vessel security measures non-U.S. vessels that have on board, as of July 1, 2004, a valid ISSC attesting to the vessel's compliance with SOLAS security requirements and the ISPS Code. We believe that our fleet is currently in compliance with applicable security requirements.

Inspection by Classification Societies

Every oceangoing vessel must be "classed" by a classification society. The classification society certifies that the vessel is "in-class," signifying that the vessel has been built and maintained in accordance with the rules of the classification society and complies with applicable rules and regulations of the vessel's country of registry and the international conventions of which that country is a member. In addition, where surveys are required by international conventions and corresponding laws and ordinances of a flag state, the classification society will undertake them on application or by official order, acting on behalf of the authorities concerned.

Most insurance underwriters make it a condition for insurance coverage that a vessel be certified as "in-class" by a classification society which is a member of the International Association of Classification Societies. All our vessels are certified as being "in-class" by a recognized classification society.

Risk of loss and insurance

Our business is affected by a number of risks, including mechanical failure of the vessels, collisions, property loss to the vessels, cargo loss or damage and business interruption due to political circumstances in foreign countries, hostilities and labor strikes. In addition, the operation of any ocean-going vessel is subject to the inherent possibility of catastrophic marine disaster, including oil spills and other environmental mishaps, and the liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in international trade.  OPA, which imposes virtually unlimited liability upon owners, operators and demise charterers of any vessel trading in the United States exclusive economic zone for certain oil pollution accidents in the United States, has made liability insurance more expensive for ship owners and operators trading in the United States market.


26



Our General Manager is responsible for arranging the insurance of our vessels in line with standard industry practice. In accordance with that practice, we maintain marine hull and machinery and war risks insurance, which include the risk of actual or constructive total loss, and protection and indemnity insurance with mutual assurance associations. We carry insurance covering the loss of hire resulting from marine casualties or hull and marine particular damages on our vessels. Currently, the amount of coverage for liability for pollution, spillage and leakage available to us on commercially reasonable terms through protection and indemnity associations and providers of excess coverage is $1.0 billion per vessel per occurrence. Protection and indemnity associations are mutual marine indemnity associations formed by shipowners to provide protection from large financial loss to one member by contribution towards that loss by all members.

We believe that our current insurance coverage is adequate to protect us against the accident-related risks involved  in the conduct of our business and that we maintain appropriate levels of environmental damage and pollution insurance coverage, consistent with standard industry practice. However, there is no assurance that all risks are adequately insured against, that any particular claims will be paid or that we will be able to procure adequate insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates in the future.

C.  ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

See Exhibit 8.1 for a list of our significant subsidiaries.

D.  PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

We operate a modernThe following table summarizes key information about Knightsbridge's fleet of four Capesize dry bulk carriers. The name, dwt, flagvessels and datenewbuildings as of original delivery fromMarch 31, 2015 (just prior to completion of the builder's yard are set forth below.

Merger):

27



Vessel name Type Approx. dwt Flag Year Built
Belgravia Capesize 170,500 Marshall Islands 2009
Battersea Capesize 170,500 Marshall Islands 2009
Golden Future Capesize 176,000 Hong Kong 2010
Golden Zhejiang Capesize 176,000 Hong Kong 2010
Vessel Built Approximate DWT Flag Type of Employment
         
Capesize - owned tonnage
Battersea (1)
 2009 169,500 MI Spot related time charter
Belgravia (1)
 2009 169,500 MI Spot market
Golden Future (1)
 2010 176,000 HK Spot related time charter
Golden Zhejiang (1)
 2010 176,000 HK Spot related time charter
KSL China (1)
 2013 179,000 MI Spot market
KSL Salvador 2014 181,000 HK Spot market
KSL San Francisco 2014 181,000 HK Spot related time charter with RWE
KSL Santiago 2014 181,000 HK Spot related time charter with RWE
KSL Santos 2014 181,000 HK Spot market
KSL Sapporo 2014 181,000 HK Spot market
KSL Seattle 2014 181,000 HK Spot market
KSL Singapore 2014 181,000 HK Spot market
KSL Sydney 2014 181,000 HK Spot market
KSL Sakura 2015 181,000 HK Spot market
Golden Kathrine 2015 182,500 HK Spot market
KSL Seoul 2015 181,000 HK Spot related time charter with RWE
KSL Seville 2015 181,000 HK Spot market
KSL Stockholm 2015 181,000 HK Spot related time charter with RWE
         
Capesize - newbuilding
KSL Aso 2015 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Atlantic (2)
 2015 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Baltic (2)
 2015 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Barnet 2015 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Bexley 2015 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Caribbean (2) (3)
 2015 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Finsbury 2015 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Fulham 
 2015 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Shanghai 2015 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Cirrus 
 2016 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Savannah 
 2016 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Arcus 2016 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Calvus (4)
 2016 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Cumulus 2016 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Fractus (4)
 2016 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Incus (4)
 
 2016 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Mediterranean (2)
 2016 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Nimbus 
 2016 180,000 n/a n/a
KSL Radiatus (4)
 2016 180,000 n/a n/a
         
Newcastlemax - newbuilding
KSL Scape (3)
 2015 210,000 n/a n/a
KSL Swift (3)
 2015 210,000 n/a n/a

1.In April 2015, the Company agreed to a sale and lease back transaction for this vessel with Ship Finance.
2.In April 2015, the Company agreed to sell this newbuilding vessel following the completion of construction its delivery to the Company.

28



3.In April 2015, the Company agreed to a delay in the delivery date from 2015 to 2016. This will also result in an extension in the payment profile of newbuilding installments.
4.In April 2015, the Company agreed to a delay in the delivery date from 2016 to 2017. This will also result in an extension in the payment profile of newbuilding installments.

Please see "Item 4A-Information on the discussion in Item 3B. above for a description of environmental regulations that may affect our utilizationCompany – History and Development of the vessels. We have also concluded two newbuilding contracts for 182,000 dwt Capesize bulk carriers. Company."

Key to Flags: MI - Marshall Islands, HK - Hong Kong.

The following table summarizes key information about the fleet of vessels areand newbuildings acquired as a result of the Merger on March 31, 2015:

Vessel Built Approximate DWT Flag Type of Employment
         
Capesize - owned tonnage
Channel Alliance (1)
 1996 171,978 HK Spot market
Channel Navigator (1)
 1997 172,058 HK Spot market
Golden Feng 2009 170,500 MI Spot related time charter
Golden Magnum (2)
 2009 179,788 HK Spot market
Golden Shui 2009 170,500 MI Spot related time charter
Golden Beijing (2)
 2010 176,000 HK Spot related time charter
Golden Zhoushan (2)
 2011 175,834 HK Spot related time charter
Golden Opus (3)
 2010 180,716 HK Spot market
         
Ice Class Panamax - owned tonnage
Golden Ice 2008 75,500 HK Spot market
Golden Opportunity 2008 75,500 HK Spot market
Golden Saguenay 2008 75,500 HK Spot market
Golden Strength (4)
 2009 75,745 HK Time charter
Golden Suek (5)
 2011 74,500 HK Time charter
Golden Bull (6)
 2012 74,500 HK Time charter
Golden Brilliant 2013 74,500 HK Spot market
Golden Diamond 2013 74,187 HK Spot market
Golden Pearl 2013 74,187 HK Spot market
Golden Ruby 2014 74,500 HK Spot market
         
Panamax - chartered in
Golden Lyderhorn (7)
 1999 74,242 HK Spot market
Golden Sakura (8)
 2007 76,596 PA Spot market
         
Kamsarmax - owned tonnage
Golden Eminence 2010 79,447 HK Spot related time charter
Golden Empress (9)
 2010 79,600 HK Time charter
Golden Endeavour (10)
 2010 79,600 HK Time charter
Golden Endurer (11)
 2011 79,600 HK Time charter
Golden Enterprise 2011 79,471 HK Spot market
Golden Daisy 2012 81,507 MI Spot market
Golden Ginger 2012 81,487 MI Spot market
Golden Rose 2012 81,585 MI Spot market
         
Kamsarmax - chartered in

29



Golden Eclipse (12)
 2010 79,600 HK Time charter
         
Supramax - owned
Golden Aries 2015 63,800 HK Spot market
Golden Cecilie 2015 60,000 HK Spot market
Golden Cathrine 2015 60,000 HK Spot market
Golden Gemini 2015 63,800 HK Spot market
         
Supramax - chartered in
Golden Hawk 2015 58,000 PA Spot market
         
Supramax - newbuildings
Golden Taurus 2015 63,800 n/a n/a
Golden Leo 2016 63,800 n/a n/a
Golden Libra 2016 63,800 n/a n/a
Golden Virgo 2016 63,800 n/a n/a

1.In April 2015, the Company agreed to sell this vessel with expected delivered to the buyer by the end of June 2015.
2.In April 2015, the Company agreed to a sale and lease back transaction for this vessel with Ship Finance.
3.This vessel is owned through a joint venture with ST Shipping and Transportation Pte Ltd.
4.The time charter expires in May 2015.
5.The time charter expires in November 2016.
6.The time charter expires in August 2017.
7.This vessel is chartered in on a bareboat charter expiring in September 2016 and is recorded as a vessel under capital lease.
8.This vessel is chartered in on a time charter with earliest re-delivery in June 2015, which is recorded as an operating lease.
9.The time charter expires in December 2021.
10.The time charter expires in October 2020.
11.The time charter expires in November 2020.
12.This vessel is chartered in on a bareboat charter expiring in February 2020 and is recorded as a vessel under capital lease. The time charter-out expires in February 2020.

Please see "Item 4A-Information on the Company – History and Development of the Company."

Key to be delivered to us during 2015. Flags: MI - Marshall Islands, HK - Hong Kong, PA - Panama.

Other than itsour interests in the vessels and newbuilding contracts, the Company has no interestnewbuildings described above, we do not own any material physical properties. We lease office space in anyOslo from Frontline Management AS, a subsidiary of Frontline, at market rates. We also have other property.leased properties, which are not considered material.

ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.


2830



ITEM 5.  OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

A. OPERATING RESULTS

Overview

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with "Item 3. Selected3-Selected Financial Data", "Item 4-Information on the Company" and the Company's audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included herein.

In February 1997, the Company's five wholly-owned subsidiaries each purchased one VLCC. From their purchase in February 1997 untilAs of March 2004, the Company chartered the VLCCs to Shell International on long-term bareboat charters. The charters expired for all five VLCCs, in accordance with their terms, in March 2004 and the VLCCs were redelivered31, 2015, just prior to the Companycompletion of the Merger, Knightsbridge owned and subsequentlyoperated 18 Capesize vessels and owned 21 newbuildings with expected delivery dates in 2015 and 2016. Each of the vessels is (or, in the case of newbuildings, are expected to be) owned and operated by one of our subsidiaries and is (or expected to be) flagged either in the Marshall Islands or Hong Kong.

As of March 31, 2015, and following completion of the Merger, we own 47 vessels and have 25 newbuildings under construction. In addition, we have four vessels chartered-in and one vessel owned through a joint venture. Six of the vessels are chartered out on fixed rate time charters and spot markets. One VLCC was sold in December 2007.
In May 2007, the Company entered into agreements for the construction of two Capesize dry bulk carriers, each with a cargo-carrying capacity of approximately 170,000 dwt, with Daehan Shipbuilding Co Ltdremainder operate in the Republic of Korea. Both ofspot market or are fixed on index-linked time charter contracts.

A full fleet list is provided in "Item 4D-Information on the Company-Property, Plant and Equipment" showing the vessels commenced five-year time charters following their delivery to us in August and October 2009. In July 2010,newbuildings that we acquired a 2010-built Capesize dry bulk carrier from Golden Oceancurrently own and in October 2010, we acquired a second 2010-built Capesize dry bulk carrier from Golden Ocean. Both vessels were acquired with existing time charters.

In December 2007, we sold a VLCC to an unrelated third party for net proceeds of $99.0 million.

In December 2011, an agreement was reached with Frontline,  the charterer of Hampstead, to reduce the daily charter rate from $37,750 to $27,050 from January 1, 2012 until April 22, 2012, the date when the vessel was re-delivered to us from its time charterer. During this period, the charterer was obligated to compensate us for any daily vessel earnings above $27,050 up to and including $37,750. There was no compensation above the daily gross hire rate for the first quarter of 2012. In August 2012, the vessel was sold to an unrelated third party, but the sale was not completed due to the buyer's default, and we retained the deposit received in the amount of $2.43 million. In September 2012, the VLCC Hampstead was sold to an unrelated third party, for net proceeds of $22.2 million.

In July 2012, Hong Xiang, the charterer of the Golden Zhejiang, redelivered the vessel before final maturity of the charter. Also in July 2012, Sanko, the charterer of the Battersea, redelivered the vessel prior to the expiration of the minimum period of the charter. In October 2012, we terminated the charter for the VLCC Mayfair due to the charterer's default.

In October 2012, we sold the VLCC Titan Venus for net proceeds of $19.8 million. In December 2012, we sold the VLCC Kensington for net proceeds of $22.5 million. Our one remaining VLCC, the Mayfair is classified as held for sale at December 31, 2012, and in March 2013, we entered into an agreement for the sale of this vessel for scrap for gross sale proceeds of $17.5 million, with expected delivery in the second quarter of 2013.

Following the sale of three VLCCs during 2012, we own four Capesize dry bulk vessels and one VLCC. Each of the Capesize dry bulk vessels were operating on time charters as of December 31, 2012: (i) on time charter that expired in January 2013 and the vessel then commenced a time charter for a minimum period of 11 months and a maximum period of 13 months at a market index based daily rate: (ii) on time charter until August 2014 at a rate of $46,412 per day less 2.5% commission. The rate was reduced from $52,670 in March 2012 after renegotiations with the charterer: (iii) on time charter until April 2013 earning a rate of $7,350 per day less 6.5% commission: and (iv) on time charter until October 2013 earning a rate of $9,500 per day less 6.25% commission. The VLCC was unfixed as of December 31, 2012 and was being marketed for sale.

Market Overview and Trend Information

Dry Bulk Market

The global economy was under pressure during 2012 and the International Monetary Fund again lowered its forecast. In particular the Eurozone is struggling with high unemployment and negative growth in some of the worst hit countries. The United States has shown certain signs of recovery and also China released encouraging economic data at the end of 2012.

Dry bulk transportation increased by around seven percent in 2012, however, due to the high number of new vessels entering the market, fleet utilization decreased. Given a net fleet growth of approximately 11 percent, the estimated utilization of the dry bulk fleet was on average 83 percent in 2012. Consequently spot earnings were low. The Capesize and Panamax segments both earned on average approximately $7,650 per day according to industry sources. The weak spot market and long term time charter market

29



resulted in lower asset values throughout the year. By the end of the year, a five year old Capesize was valued at approximately $30 million, while a similar aged Panamax was worth approximately $20 million.

Around 220 Capesize vessels and 375 Panamax vessels were delivered in 2012, still this was 30 percent lower than the official order book at the beginning of the year. At the same time approximately 90 Capesize vessels and 135 Panamax Vessels were sold for scrap. For the dry bulk fleet as a whole 35 million dwt were scrapped against 95 million dwt of deliveries.

Deliveries of new vessels will decrease sharply over the next 24 months. With the same delivery ratio we have experienced over the last three years approximately 60 million dwt should be delivered this year, while the order book for 2014 is 25 million dwt for the entire dry bulk sector. The low spot market presently experienced and relatively high scrap prices should encourage more scrapping. Most forecasters are expecting scrapping to remain at similar levels as last year and consequently net fleet growth could be as low as five percent during 2013.

The steel industry and energy coal for utilities account for almost 70 percent of dry bulk transportation. For several years the importance of increased steel production and energy consumption in China and the increased dependence of this country for the dry bulk market have been well known. Also, in 2012, iron ore and coal imports showed remarkable growth. Iron ore increased by around eight percent while coal imports increased by almost 30 percent year on year. This was in spite of much slower growth in steel and energy consumption (2 percent and 3.4 percent respectively).
There are a few factors which make most analysts fairly optimistic for dry bulk demand growth going forward. Quality of Chinese domestic iron ore production is on a steady declining trend. Since 2007 China has invested roughly $85 billion in iron ore mining. Over the same period investments per effective ton iron ore produced has increased from $15 per ton in 2007 to $60 per ton in 2012. Adjusting for falling Fe content, effective iron ore production in 2012 is broadly at the same level as in 2007. Even in a modest steel growth scenario for China most forecasters believe in continued strong growth in iron ore imports.

Tanker Market

The market rate for a VLCC trading on a standard 'TD3' voyage between the Arabian Gulf and Japan in the fourth quarter of 2012 was WS 42.8, representing an increase of approximately WS 7 points from the third quarter of 2012 and a decrease of approximately WS 15 points from the fourth quarter of 2011. Present market indications are approximately $200 per day in the second quarter of 2013.

Bunkers at Fujairah averaged $615/mt in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to $650/mt in the third quarter of 2012. Bunker prices varied between a low of $593/mt on November 5, 2012 and a high of $655/mt on October 1, 2012.

According to the International Energy Agency ("IEA"), oil production by OPEC countries, including Iraq, was 30.9 million barrels per day (mb/d) in the fourth quarter of 2012. This represented a decrease of 0.5 mb/d compared to the third quarter of 2012, due to lower Saudi Arabian production in November and December.

The IEA estimates that world oil demand averaged 91.0 mb/d in the fourth quarter of 2012, which is an increase of 0.8 mb/d compared to previous quarter and the IEA estimates that world oil demand averaged approximately 89.8 mb/d in 2012, representing an increase of 1.1 percent or 1.0 mb/d from 2011. According to the IEA, 2013 demand is expected to be 90.7 mb/d.

The VLCC fleet increased by approximately 5% in 2012 to 622 vessels. The orderbook was 81 vessels at the end of 2012 and represents approximately 13 percent of the VLCC fleet. According to industry sources, the single hull VLCC fleet is 17 vessels.charter-in.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires that management make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
 
Management believes that the following accounting policies are the most critical in fully understanding and evaluating ourKnightsbridge's reported financial results as they require a higher degree of judgment in their application resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. See Note 2 to ourthe audited Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for details of all of our material accounting policies.
 
Revenue and expense recognition

30



 
Revenues and expenses are recognized on the accruals basis. Revenues are generated from freight billings,voyage charters, time charter and bareboat charter hires. Voyage revenues and expenses are recognized ratably over the estimated length of each voyage and, therefore, are allocated between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each period. The impact of recognizing voyageVoyage expenses ratably over the length of each voyage is not materially different on a quarterly and annual basis from a method of recognizing such costsare recognized as incurred. Probable losses on voyages are provided for in full at the time such losses can be estimated. Time charter and bareboat charter revenues are recorded over the term of the charter as a service is provided. The Company usesWhen a time charter contract is linked to an index, we recognize revenue for the applicable period based on the actual index for that period.We use a discharge-to-discharge basis in determining percentage of completion for all spot voyages and voyages servicing contracts of affreightment whereby it recognizeswe recognize revenue ratably from when product is discharged (unloaded) at the end of one voyage to when it is discharged after the next voyage. However, the Company doeswe did not recognize revenue if a charter haswas not been contractually committed to by a customer and the Company,us, even if the vessel has discharged its cargo and iswas sailing to the anticipated load port on its next voyage.

Demurrage is a form of damages for breaching the period allowed to load and unload cargo in a voyage charter, or the laytime, and is recognized as income according to the terms of the voyage charter contract when the charterer remains in possession of the vessel after the agreed laytime.

Claims for unpaid charter hire and damages for early termination of time charters are recorded upon receipt of cash when collectability is not reasonably assured. Such amounts related to services previously rendered are recorded as time charter revenue. Amounts in excess of services previously rendered are classified as other operating income.

Losses from Uncollectible Receivablesuncollectible receivables

Losses from uncollectible receivables are accruedaccrue when information is available before the financial statements are issued that indicates that it is probable that a receivable will not be collected and the amountcollection of the loss caninvoiced revenues is not assured. Management makes a judgment with regards to whether or not this should be recognized as income and if collection is not reasonably estimated.assured, no revenue

31



will be recognized until cash has been received. These conditions are considered in relation to individual receivables or in relation to groups of similar types of receivables.receivable.

Vessels and depreciation
 
Vessels are stated at cost less accumulated deprecation. Depreciation is calculated based on cost less estimated residual value, using the straight-line method, over the useful life of each vessel. The useful life of each vessel is deemed to be 25 years.

The carrying value of each of the Company'sour vessels represents its original cost at the time it was delivered or purchased less depreciation calculated using an estimated useful life of 25 years from the date such vessel was originally delivered fromdate. On January 1, 2014, Knightsbridge changed the shipyard. Effective July 1, 2009, the Company effected a change in estimate related to the estimated scrap rate for its four VLCCsCapesize vessels from $149an average of $281 per lightweight ton to $281$361 per lightweight ton. The resulting increasechange in salvage value has been applied prospectively and reduced depreciationdepreciation/increased net income by approximately $1.0$0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.2014. This change did not have an impact on basic and diluted earnings per share. The Company'sestimated residual values for the eight Capesize newbuildings delivered in 2014 and the 2013-built Capesize vessel purchased in 2014 are based on estimated scrap rates of $362 to $380 per lightweight ton. Our assumptions used in the determination of estimated salvage value took into account then current scrap prices, the historic pattern of scrap rates over the ten years ended December 31, 2008,2013, estimated changes in future market demand for scrap steel and estimated future demand for vessels. Management believes that $281$361 per lightweight ton is a reasonable estimate of future scrap prices, taking into consideration the cyclicality of the nature of future demand for scrap steel. Although management believes that the assumptions used to determine the scrap rate are reasonable and appropriate, such assumptions are highly subjective, in part, because of the cyclicality of the nature of future demand for scrap steel.

Vessel Impairment of Long Lived Assets

The carrying values of the Company'sour vessels and newbuildings may not represent their fair market value at any point in time since the market prices of second-hand vessels and the cost of newbuildings tend to fluctuate with changes in charter rates and the cost of newbuildings.rates. Historically, both charter rates and vessel values tend to be cyclical. The carrying amounts of vessels that are held and used by the Companyus and newbuildings under development are reviewed for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a particular vessel or newbuilding may not be fully recoverable. In such instances, an impairment charge would be recognized if the estimate of the undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the vessel and its eventual disposition is less than the vessel's carrying amount. This assessment is made at the individual vessel level as separately identifiable cash flow information for each vessel is available. Fair value is estimated based on values achieved for the sale/purchase of similar vessels and appraised valuations.
 
In developing estimates of future cash flows, the Companywe must make assumptions about future performance, with significant assumptions being related to charter rates, ship operating expenses, utilization, drydocking requirements, residual value and the estimated remaining useful lives of the vessels. These assumptions are based on historical trends as well as future expectations. Specifically, in estimating future charter rates, management takes into consideration rates currently in effect for existing time charters and estimated daily time charter equivalent rates for each vessel class for the unfixed days over the estimated remaining lives of each of the vessels. The estimated daily time charter equivalent rates used for unfixed days are based on a combination of (i) trading exchange forecasts, and (ii) the trailing 20-year historical average rates, based on quarterly average rates published by a third party maritime research service. Recognizing that the transportation of dry bulk cargoes is cyclical and subject to significant volatility based on factors beyond the Company'sour control, management believes the use of estimates based on the combination of internally forecasted rates and 20-year historical average rates calculated as of the reporting date to be reasonable.


31



Estimated outflows for operating expenses and drydocking requirements are based on historical and budgeted costs and are adjusted for assumed inflation. Finally, utilization is based on historical levels achieved and estimates of a residual value are consistent with the pattern of scrap rates used in management's evaluation of salvage value.

The more significant factors that could impact management's assumptions regarding time charter equivalent rates include (i) loss or reduction in business from significant customers, (ii) unanticipated changes in demand for transportation of dry bulk cargoes, (iii) greater than anticipated levels of newbuilding orders or lower than anticipated levels of vessel scrappings, and (v) changes in rules and regulations applicable to the dry bulk industry, including legislation adopted by international organizations such as the IMO and the EU or by individual countries. Although management believes that the assumptions used to evaluate potential impairment are reasonable and appropriate at the time they were made, such assumptions are highly subjective and likely to change, possibly materially, in the future. There can be no assurance as to how long charter rates and vessel values will remain at their current low levels or whether they will improve by a significant degree. If charter rates were to remain at depressed levels future assessments of vessel impairment would be adversely affected.

32




Our Fleet – Comparison of Possible Excess of Carrying Value Over Estimated Charter-Free Market Value of Certain Vessels

In "Critical Accounting Policies – Impairment of long-lived assets," we discuss our policy for impairing the carrying values of our vessels.vessels and newbuildings. During the past few years, the market values of vessels have experienced particular volatility, with substantial declines in many vessel classes.  As a result, the charter-free market value, or basic market value, of certain of our vessels may have declined below those vessels' carrying value, even though we would not impair those vessels' carrying value under our accounting impairment policy, due to our belief that future undiscounted cash flows expected to be earned by such vessels over their operating lives would exceed such vessels' carrying amounts.

Our estimates of basic market value assume that our vessels are all in good and seaworthy condition without need for repair and if inspected would be certified in class without notations of any kind.  Our estimates are based on the estimated market values achieved for ourthe sale/purchase of similar vessels that we have received from shipbrokersand appraised valuations and are inherently uncertain. In addition, vessel values are highly volatile; as such, our estimates may not be indicative of the current or future basic market value of our vessels or prices that we could achieve if we were to sell them.

The table set forth below indicates (i) the carrying value of each of ourKnightsbridge's Capesize vessels as of December 31, 2012, (ii) which of those vessels we believe has a basic market value, based on ship broker reports, below its carrying value, and (iii) the aggregate difference between carrying value and market value represented by such vessels. We believe that the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be earned by those vessels, which have experienced a decline in charter-free market value below such vessels' carrying value, over their reporting lives would exceed vessels' carrying values as of December 31, 2012, and accordingly, have not recorded an impairment charge.2014;

Vessel Built 
Approximate
Dwt

 
Carrying Value
($ millions)*

 Built 
Approximate
Dwt

 
Carrying Value
($ millions)

Belgravia(1) 2009 170,500
 73.1
 2009 169,500
 67.2
Battersea(1) 2009 170,500
 77.7
 2009 169,500
 71.3
Golden Future(1) 2010 176,000
 65.6
 2010 176,000
 60.4
Golden Zhejiang(1) 2010 176,000
 57.4
 2010 176,000
 53.2
KSL China (1)
 2013 179,000
 61.4
KSL Seattle 2014 181,000
 68.1
KSL Singapore 2014 181,000
 68.1
KSL Sapporo 2014 181,000
 68.4
KSL Salvador 2014 181,000
 69.3
KSL San Francisco 2014 181,000
 65.7
KSL Santos 2014 181,000
 65.6
KSL Sydney 2014 181,000
 68.8
KSL Santiago 2014 181,000
 65.2

1.In April 2015, the Company agreed to a sale and lease back transaction for this vessel with Ship Finance.We believe that the basic charter-free market value for each of these vessels is lower than its carrying value and that the aggregate carrying value of these vessels exceeds their aggregate basic charter-free market value by approximately $104.2 million.
* As of December 31, 2012,
We believe that the basic charter-free market value for each of the four Capesize vessels above is lower than the vessel'sits carrying value. We believevalue and that the aggregate carrying value of these vessels exceeds their aggregate basic charter-free market value by approximately $140.1$210.0 million.

In addition, we had one VLCC We believe that the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be earned by each of these vessels over its remaining estimated useful life will exceed the vessel's carrying value as of December 31, 2012. This vessel had a2014, and accordingly, have not recorded an impairment charge.

The basic charter-free market value for each of the 14 newbuildings we owned at December 31, 2014, is lower than the newbuilding's total estimated cost of completion (being the aggregate of the carrying value at December 31, 2014, remaining installments to be paid and estimated newbuilding supervision costs and capitalized interest). We believe that the aggregate estimated cost of $21.5 millioncompletion of these newbuildings exceeds their aggregate basic charter-free market value by approximately $71.0 million. We believe that the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be earned by each newbuilding over its estimated useful life will exceed the newbuilding's estimated cost of completion and, was classified as "held for sale". In March 2013, we agreed to sell this vessel for scrap with expected delivery in the second quarter of 2013 for gross sale proceeds of $17.5 million.accordingly, have not recorded an impairment charge.


33



We refer you to the risk factor entitled "Because the"The fair market valuevalues of our vessels have declined and may fluctuate significantly,decline further, which could limit the amount of funds that we can borrow, cause us to breach certain financial covenants in our credit facilities, or result in an impairment charge, and we may incur losses whena loss if we sell vessels which may adversely affect our earnings" and the discussion herein under the heading "Business Overview"following a decline in their market value".

Factors Affecting Our Results


32



The principal factors which affect our results of operations and financial position include:

operating revenues;
gains (losses) from the sale of assets;
voyage expenses and commissions;
vessel operating expenses;
impairment losses on vessels;
provisions for uncollectible receivables;
administrative expenses;
depreciation;
interest expense; and

discontinued operations.
 
Voyage expenses and commissions include port expenses, bunkers (fuel), voyage related insurance premiums, other voyage related costs and broker commissions.

Operating costs are the direct costs associated with running a vessel and include crew costs, vessel supplies, repairs and maintenance, drydockings, lubricating oils and insurance. We bear the operating costs for our vessels which operate under time charter.

An impairment loss on a vessel, equal to the difference between the vessel's carrying value and fair value, is recognized when the estimated future net undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the vessel.

Losses from uncollectible receivables are accrued when information is available before the financial statements are issued that indicates that it is probable that a receivable will not be collected.

Administrative expenses are composed of general corporate overhead expenses, including audit fees, directors' fees and expenses, registrar fees, investor relations and publication expenses, legal and professional fees, restricted stock unit, or RSU, expense and other general administrative expenses.

Depreciation, or the periodic cost charged to our income for the reduction in usefulness and long-term value of our vessels, is also related to the number of vessels we own. We depreciate the cost of our vessels, less their estimated residual value, over their estimated useful life on a straight-line basis.

Interest expense depends on our overall borrowing levels and will change with prevailing interest rates, although the effect of these changes may be reduced by interest rate swaps or other derivative instruments. At December 31, 2011,2014, all of our debt was floating rate debt. We have assumed interest rate swaps from the Former Golden Ocean following completion of the Merger and we may enter into further interest rate swap arrangements if we believe it is advantageous to do so.

The Company hasWe have determined that an individual vessel within a vessel class is not a component as defined by the accounting standard for the purpose of discontinued operations as the Company doeswe do not believe that the operations of an individual vessel within a vessel class can be clearly distinguished. Generally, the Company believeswe believe that all of the vessels in a vessel class represent a component as defined for the purpose of discontinued operations and has presented the operations of the VLCCs as discontinued operations since three of those vessels were sold during 2012 and the remaining VLCC meetsmet the criteria for held for sale at December 31, 2012. This vessel was sold during 2013.

Lack of Historical Operating Data for Vessels before their Acquisition

34




Consistent with shipping industry practice, other than inspection of the physical condition of the vessels and examinations of classification society records, there is no historical financial due diligence process when we acquire vessels. Accordingly, we do not obtain the historical operating data for the vessels from the sellers because that information is not material to our decision to make acquisitions, nor do we believe it would be helpful to potential investors in our common shares in assessing our business or profitability. Most vessels are sold under a standardized agreement, which, among other things, provides the buyer with the right to inspect the vessel and the vessel's classification society records. The standard agreement does not give the buyer the right to inspect, or receive copies of, the historical operating data of the vessel. Prior to the delivery of a purchased vessel, the seller typically removes from the vessel all records, including past financial records and accounts related to the vessel. In addition, the technical management agreement between the seller's technical manager and the seller is automatically terminated and the vessel's trading certificates are revoked by its flag state following a change in ownership.
 
Consistent with shipping industry practice and U.S. GAAP, we treat the acquisition of a vessel (whether acquired with or without charter) as the acquisition of an asset rather than a business. Although vessels are generally acquired free of charter, we have agreed to acquire (and may in the future acquire) some vessels with time charters. Where a vessel has been under a voyage charter, the vessel is delivered to the buyer free of charter. It is rare in the shipping industry for the last charterer of the vessel in the hands of the seller to continue as the first charterer of the vessel in the hands of the buyer. In most cases, when a vessel is under time charter and the

33



buyer wishes to assume that charter, the vessel cannot be acquired without the charterer's consent and the buyer's entering into a separate direct agreement with the charterer to assume the charter. The purchase of a vessel itself does not transfer the charter, because it is a separate service agreement between the vessel owner and the charterer. When we purchase a vessel and assume a related time charter, we must take the following steps before the vessel will be ready to commence operations:

obtain the charterer's consent to us as the new owner;
obtain the charterer's consent to a new technical manager;
in some cases, obtain the charterer's consent to a new flag for the vessel;
arrange for a new crew for the vessel;
replace all hired equipment on board, such as gas cylinders and communication equipment;
negotiate and enter into new insurance contracts for the vessel through our own insurance brokers;
register the vessel under a flag state and perform the related inspections in order to obtain new trading certificates from the flag state;
implement a new planned maintenance program for the vessel; and
ensure that the new technical manager obtains new certificates for compliance with the safety and vessel security regulations of the flag state.

Inflation
 
Although inflation has had a moderate impact on our vessel operating expenses and corporate overheads, management does not consider inflation to be a significant risk to direct costs in the current and foreseeable economic environment. It is anticipated that insurance costs, which have risen over the last three years, may well continue to rise moderately over the next few years. Dry bulk cargo transportation is a specialized area and the number of vessels is increasing. There will therefore be an increased demand for qualified crew and this has and will continue to put inflationary pressure on crew costs. However, in a shipping downturn, costs subject to inflation can usually be controlled because shipping companies typically monitor costs to preserve liquidity and encourage suppliers and service providers to lower rates and prices in the event of a downturn.

Year ended December 31, 20122014 compared with year ended December 31, 20112013

Operating revenues


35



(in thousands of $) 2012
 2011
 % Change
 2014
 2013
 % Change
Time charter revenues 35,046
 55,497
 (36.9) 22,656
 27,677
 (18.1)
Voyage charter revenues 2,269
 
 
 53,706
 9,869
 444.2
Other operating income 20,353
 
 
Total operating revenues 37,315
 55,497
 (32.8) 96,715
 37,546
 157.6

Time charter revenues decreased in the year ended December 31, 20122014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011,2013 primarily due to reduceda decrease in revenues of $9.3 million from the Belgravia, which traded on time charter to mid-June 2014 at which time it was redelivered to Knightsbridge and commenced trading in the spot market. This was partially offset by an increase in revenues of $3.5 million from (i)the Golden Zhejiang, which resulted in part due to $1.9 million received as partial settlement of a claim for unpaid charter hire and damages. This amount was received in March 2014 and was recorded as time charter revenue as it related to unrecognized time charter revenue in respect of services previously rendered.

Voyage charter revenues increased in the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily due to the following reasons;

An increase in revenues of $41.4 million, which resulted from the delivery of eight newbuildings in 2014 (KSL Seattle and KSL Singapore were delivered in May; KSL Sapporo and KSL Sydney were delivered in June and July, respectively; KSL Salvador and KSL Santiago were delivered in September and KSL San Francisco and KSL Santos were delivered in October) and the delivery of Bulk China (renamed KSL China), purchased from Karpasia, in April 2014, all of which commenced trading in the spot market upon delivery.
An increase in revenues of $5.5 million from the Belgravia, which commenced trading in the spot market during the second half of 2014 following its redelivery from time charter.

This was partially offset by a decrease in revenues of $3.0 million from the Battersea, which traded in the amountspot market to August 2014 at which time it commenced a time charter terms with an earliest redelivery in July 2015.

Other operating income in the year ended December 31, 2014 comprises;

$17.5 million received in respect of $8.6 million, including a provisionclaim for doubtful accounts of $3.0 million, as a result of theunpaid charter hire and damages for early termination of the time charter in July 2012 due to the charterer filing for bankruptcy, and (ii) the Golden Zhejiang in the amount of $10.0 million, including a provision for doubtful accounts of. Knightsbridge also received $1.9 million in this respect and this amount was recorded as time charter revenue as it related to unrecognized time charter revenue in respect of services previously rendered.
$0.3 million received in respect of a result of theclaim for unpaid charter hire and damages for early termination of the time charter for the Battersea, and
$2.6 million received as settlement for the early charter termination of a time charter for the Belgravia.

Operating expenses

(in thousands of $) 2014
 2013
 % Change
Voyage expenses and commission 33,955
 6,809
 398.7
Ship operating expenses 18,676
 7,897
 136.5
Administrative expenses 5,037
 4,937
 2.0
Depreciation 19,561
 11,079
 76.6
Total operating expenses 77,229
 30,722
 151.4
Voyage expenses and commissions increased in July 2012the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily due to the charterer'sfollowing reasons;

An increase $25.6 million, which resulted from the delivery of eight newbuildings in 2014 (KSL Seattle and KSL Singapore were delivered in May; KSL Sapporo and KSL Sydney were delivered in June and July, respectively; KSL Salvador and KSL Santiago were delivered in September and KSL San Francisco and KSL Santos were delivered in October) and the delivery of Bulk China (renamed KSL China), purchased from Karpasia, in April 2014, all of which commenced trading in the spot market upon delivery.
An increase of $3.1 million from Belgravia, which commenced trading in the spot market during the second half of 2014 following its redelivery from time charter.

36




This was partially offset by a decrease of $1.7 million from the Battersea which traded on the spot market to August and upon redelivery from the charterer commenced trading on time charter terms.

Ship operating expenses are the direct costs associated with running a vessel and include crew costs, vessel supplies, repairs and maintenance, lubricating oils and insurance. Ship operating expenses increased in the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily due to the addition of nine vessels to the fleet during 2014.

Administrative expenses increased in the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily due to an increase in professional fees and audit fees incurred in connection with Knightsbridge's then prospective merger with the Former Golden Ocean, which was partially offset by a decrease in RSU expense.

On January 1, 2014, Knightsbridge changed the estimated scrap rate for its four Capesize vessels from an average of $281 per lightweight ton to $361 per lightweight ton. The resulting change in salvage value has been applied prospectively and reduced depreciation by approximately $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. This change also resulted in an increase in net income of approximately $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. Depreciation increased in the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily due to the addition of nine vessels to the fleet during 2014. Bulk China (renamed KSL China) was purchased in April 2014. KSL Seattle and KSL Singapore were delivered in May; KSL Sapporo and KSL Sydney were delivered in June and July, respectively; KSL Salvador and KSL Santiago were delivered in September and KSL San Francisco and KSL Santos were delivered in October.

Other income (expenses)
(in thousands of $) 2014
 2013
 % Change
Interest income 29
 41
 (29.3)
Interest expense (2,525) (2,827) (10.7)
Other financial items (737) (508) 45.1
Net other expenses (3,233) (3,294) (1.9)

Interest income in the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 relates solely to interest received on bank deposits.

Interest expense decreased in the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily due to the following reasons;

An increase in bank loan interest expense of $2.2 million, which resulted from $270.0 million of additional borrowings in connection with Knightsbridge's newbuilding program.
An increase in commitment fees of $1.3 million resulting from an increase in committed, undrawn loan facilities.

This was offset by an increase in capitalized interest on newbuildings of $3.8 million, primarily due to the newbuildings acquired from Frontline 2012 in April 2014 and September 2014.

Losses related to other financial items increased in the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily due to increased amortization of deferred charges.

Net loss from discontinued operations
(in thousands of $) 2014
 2013
 % Change
Net loss from discontinued operations (258) (7,433) (96.5)

Net loss from discontinued operations relates to the operations of Knightsbridge’s VLCCs.

Knightsbridge had one VLCC at the start of 2013, which was sold in April 2013. There were no operating revenues in the year ended December 31, 2013, while a provision of $0.2 million was made in respect of a doubtful demurrage balance. There was a gain of $0.3 million relating to the sale of equipment, operating costs of $7.3 million (including an impairment loss on vessels of $5.3 million) and non operating expenses of $0.2 million.


37



Net loss from discontinued operations in the year ended December 31, 2014, comprises primarily of legal fees incurred in connection with claims for unpaid charter hire and damages following early termination of charters.

Year ended December 31, 2013 compared with year ended December 31, 2012

(in thousands of $) 2013
 2012
 % Change
Time charter revenues 27,677
 35,046
 (21.0)
Voyage charter revenues 9,869
 2,269
 334.9
Total operating revenues 37,546
 37,315
 0.6

Time charter revenues decreased in the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to the following reasons;

A decrease in revenues of $4.5 million from the Battersea, which commenced trading in the spot market upon redelivery from time charter in April 2013.
A decrease of $6.3 million in Golden Future revenues as a result of the reduced daily rate of the new time charter, which commenced in January 2013.
A decrease in revenues of $0.4 million from the Belgravia as a result of the daily rate reduction in March 2012 from $52,670 to $46,412 per day.

This decrease in revenues was partially offset by an improvement in the results from the Golden Zhejiang. This vessel had no time charter revenues in the year ended December 31, 2012 after unamortized costs of $2.1 million relating to the time charter taken over upon the acquisition of the Golden Zhejiang, accrued income of $3.4 million and unpaid charter hire of $1.5 million were written off in the six months ended June 30, 2012 following default underof the Golden Zhejiang charterer. Time charter party agreement.revenues from the Golden Zhejiang in the year ended December 31, 2013 were $3.8 million.

In December 2013, Knightsbridge received $756,000 from Sanko Steamship Co. Ltd., or Sanko, as a partial settlement of a $17 million claim for unpaid charter hire and claims of the Battersea. This amount was recorded as time charter income in the fourth quarter of 2013.

Voyage charter revenues increased in the year ended December 31, 20122013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011,2012 primarily due to an increase in revenues of $8.7 million from the Battersea and, which commenced trading in the spot market upon redelivery from time charter in April 2013. This was partially offset by a decrease in revenues of $1.1 million from the Golden Zhejiang, operatingwhich operated in the spot market from July 2012between August and August 2012, respectively, until September 2012 after the early termination of their time charters.2012.

Operating expenses


34



(in thousands of $) 2012
 2011
 % Change
 2013
 2012
 % Change
Voyage expenses and commission 4,323
 2,020
 114.0
 6,809
 4,323
 57.5
Ship operating expenses 7,608
 7,830
 (2.8) 7,897
 7,608
 3.8
Administrative expenses 4,259
 3,528
 20.7
 4,937
 4,259
 15.9
Depreciation 11,117
 11,079
 0.3
 11,079
 11,117
 (0.3)
Total operating expenses 27,307
 24,457
 11.7
 30,722
 27,307
 12.5
 
Voyage expenses and commissioncommissions increased in the year ended December 31, 20122013 compared to the year ended December 31, 20112012 primarily due to an increase of $4.4 million from the Batterseaand Golden Zhejiang operating, which commenced trading in the spot market upon redelivery from Julytime charter in April 2013. This was partially offset by a decrease of $1.3 million from the Golden Zhejiang, which operated in the spot market between August and August 2012, respectively, until September 2012.

Ship operating expenses are the direct costs associated with running a vessel and include crew costs, vessel supplies, repairs and maintenance, lubricating oils and insurance.

Administrative expenses increased in the year ended December 31, 20122013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011,2012 primarily due to an increase in restricted stock unit expenselegal fees incurred in connection with Knightsbridge’s claims against certain charterers.


38



Depreciation in the year ended December 31, 2013 is consistent with the year ended December 31, 2012 and legal fees.relates to the same four Capesize vessels.

Other income (expenses)
(in thousands of $) 2012
 2011
 % Change
 2013
 2012
 % Change
Interest income 106
 36
 194.4
 41
 106
 (61.3)
Interest expense (3,765) (3,529) 6.7
 (2,827) (3,765) (24.9)
Other financial items (467) (489) (4.5) (508) (467) 8.8
Net other expenses (4,126) (3,982) 3.6
 (3,294) (4,126) (20.2)

Interest income in the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 relates solely to interest received on bank deposits.

Interest expense decreased in the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to a reduction in the debt outstanding as a result of repayments and the capitalization of interest on newbuildings of $0.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2013 (2012: nil).

Losses related to other financial items increased in the year ended December 31, 20122013 as compared to the year ended December 31, 20112012 primarily due to an increase in the average cash balance on deposit following the sale of three VLCCs during 2012lower foreign exchange gains and an increase in interest rates.bank charges.

Interest expense increasedNet loss from discontinued operations
(in thousands of $) 2013
 2012
 % Change
Net loss from discontinued operations (7,433) (59,311) (87.5)

Net loss from discontinued operations relates to the operations of Knightsbridge’s VLCCs.

Knightsbridge had one VLCC at the start of 2013, which was sold in April 2013. There were no operating revenues in the year ended December 31, 2013, while a provision of $0.2 million was made in respect of a doubtful demurrage balance. There was a gain of $0.3 million relating to the sale of equipment, operating costs of $7.3 million (including an impairment loss on vessels of $5.3 million) and non operating expenses of $0.2 million.

Knightsbridge had four VLCCs at the start of 2012 and sold three of them during 2012. The net loss from discontinued operations in the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily due to an increase in the average interest rate on borrowings.

Other financial items decreased in the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily due to a foreign exchange gain in 2012.

Net (loss) incomeresulted from discontinued operations
(in thousands of $) 2012
 2011
 % Change
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations (59,311) 5,594
 (1,160.3)

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations in the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 relate to the operationsoperating revenues of the Company's VLCCs. The results from the VLCCs in 2012 were negatively impacted by the sale of three vessels during 2012 and a deterioration in operating results due to the weak tanker market. Operating revenues less voyage expense and commissions decreased by $17.3$24.5 million, in 2012, of which $5.3 million was attributable to an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts. This was partially offset by a $4.8 million decrease in operating expenses, which was primarily attributable to a decrease in dry docking costs of $3.0 million and vessel disposals. The net loss in the year ended December 31, 2012 also includes a loss onfrom the sale of vessels of $13.1 million, (2011: nil) andoperating expenses of $69.1 million (including an impairment loss of $41.6 million (2011: nil). Depreciation expense in the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $2.3 million compared to the previous year due to vessel disposals.

Year ended December 31, 2011 compared with year ended December 31, 2010

Operating revenues

(in thousands of $) 2011
 2010
 % Change
Time charter revenues 55,497
 40,825
 35.9
Total operating revenues 55,497
 40,825
 35.9


35



Time charter revenues increased in the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to an increase in time charter revenues from Golden Futuremillion) and Golden Zhejiangnon operating costs of $6.2 million and $8.1million, respectively. These two vessels were purchased with existing time charters in July and October 2010, respectively, and were operational for a full year in 2011.

Operating expenses

(in thousands of $) 2011
 2010
 % Change
Voyage expenses and commission 2,020
 1,151
 75.5
Ship operating expenses 7,830
 5,211
 50.3
Administrative expenses 3,528
 3,018
 16.9
Depreciation 11,079
 7,887
 40.5
Total operating expenses 24,457
 17,267
 41.6
Voyage expenses and commission and ship operating expenses increased in the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to the Golden Future and Golden Zhejiang, which were on time charter for the full year.

Administrative expenses increased in the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to an increase in restricted stock unit expense and audit fees.

Depreciation increased in the year ended December 31, 2011compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to a full year's charge for the Golden Future and Golden Zhejiang. These two vessels were purchased in July and October 2010, respectively.

Other income (expenses)
(in thousands of $) 2011
 2010
 % Change
Interest income 36
 46
 (21.7)
Interest expense (3,529) (2,880) 22.5
Other financial items (489) (579) (15.5)
Net other expenses (3,982) (3,413) 16.7

Interest expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to a full year's expense related to the increase in borrowings following the acquisition of two Capesize vessels in 2010.

The decrease in other financial items for the year ended December 31, 2011compared to the year ended December 31, 2010 is primarily due to loan fees paid in 2010 and a decrease in the amortization of deferred charges.

Net income from discontinued operations
(in thousands of $) 2011
 2010
 % Change
Net income from discontinued operations 5,594
 18,412
 (69.6)

Net income from discontinued operations in the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 related to the operations of the Company's VLCCs. Net income from discontinued operations decreased in the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010 primarily due to a $16.1 million decrease in operating revenues, which was partially offset by a $3.5 million decrease in ship operating expenses.$1.6 million.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

ASU 2011-04, Fair Value MeasurementAccounting Standards Update No. 2014-08-Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement205) and Disclosure RequirementsProperty, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360). The amendments in U.S. GAAPthis Update address the issues that (i) too many disposals of small groups of assets that are recurring in nature qualify for discontinued operations presentation under Subtopic 205-20, and IFRSs. Many(ii) some of the changes here are clarificationsguidance on reporting discontinued operations results in higher costs for preparers because it can be complex and difficult to apply, by changing the criteria for reporting discontinued operations and enhancing convergence of existing guidance or wording changes to

36



align with IFRS 13. The new measurement guidance did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statementsFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the new disclosureInternational Accounting Standard Board (IASB) reporting requirements for discontinued operations. We are required to apply the amendments in Note 16 "Financial Instruments".

ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwillthis Update prospectively to (i) all disposals (or classifications as held for Impairment. This ASU givessale) of components of an entity the option in itsthat occur within annual goodwill impairment test to first assess revised qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. There is no impact on the Company as a result of this guidance.

ASU 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This ASU addresses implementation issues about the scope of ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. ASU 2013-01 is effective for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Its adoption is not expected to have a materialDecember 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years, and (ii) all businesses or non-profit activities that, on acquisition, are classified as held for sale that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years. We are currently considering the impact of these amendments on the Company's disclosures.our consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2013-02, Comprehensive IncomeAccounting Standards Update No. 2014-09-Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This ASU seeks606). The FASB and the IASB initiated a joint project to improveclarify the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. An entity is requiredprinciples for recognizing revenue and to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required underdevelop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP to be reclassifiedand IFRS. To meet those objectives, the FASB is amending the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in its entirety to net income. For other amounts thatthis Update are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The requirement of this update is to ensure that this information is presented in one place, rather than in different places throughout the financial statements as it is currently. The guidance is effective prospectively for us for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. This guidance does2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not expectedpermitted. We are currently considering the impact of these amendments on our consolidated financial statements.

39




Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15-Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40). The amendments in this Update provide guidance in U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures and are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. We are currently considering the impact of these amendments on our consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02-Consolidation (Topic 810). The amendments in this Update affect reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments (i) modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities (VIEs) or voting interest entities, (ii) eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, (iii) affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships, and (iv) provide a materialscope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities with interests in certain legal entities. The amendments in this Update are effective for us for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. We are currently considering the impact of these amendments on our consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03 Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) Simplifying the Company'sPresentation of Debt Issuance Costs. This Update was issued as part of an initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards (the Simplification Initiative). The objective of the Simplification Initiative is to identify, evaluate, and improve areas of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for which cost and complexity can be reduced while maintaining or improving the usefulness of the information provided to users of financial statements. To simplify presentation of debt issuance costs, the amendments in this Update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this Update. The amendments in this Update will affect us for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently considering the impact of these amendments on our consolidated financial statements.

B. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company operatesWe operate in a capital intensive industry and hashave historically financed itsour purchase of vessels through a combination of equity capital and borrowings from commercial banks.banks, as well as the convertible bond issuance for the Former Golden Ocean. Our ability to generate adequate cash flows on a short and medium term basis depends substantially on the trading performance of our vessels in the market. Periodic adjustments to the supply of and demand for dry bulk carriers cause the industry to be cyclical in nature.

The Company's funding and treasury activitiesThere are conducted within corporate policiescurrently no material legal or economic restrictions on the ability of subsidiaries to maximize investment returns while maintaining appropriate liquidity fortransfer funds to us in the Company's requirements. Cash andform of cash equivalents are held primarily in United States dollars.dividends, loans or advances.

Short-termOut short-term liquidity requirements of the Company relate to servicing ourservice of debt, payment of operating costs, funding working capital requirements and maintaining cash reserves against fluctuations in operating cash flows and payment of cash distributions. Sources of short-term liquidity include cash balances, restricted cash balances, short-term investments and receipts from customers. Restricted cash balances are related to the minimum cash covenant in our customers. loan agreements and to margin calls on derivative positions or minor amounts secured for tax payments or for claims processes.

Revenues from time and bareboat charters are generally received monthly or bi-weekly in advance while revenues from voyage charters are received upon completion ofon negotiated terms for each voyage, normally 90/95% after completed loading and the voyage.remaining after completed discharge.

In April 2013,addition to the Company estimates it has an average cash breakeven rate for its Capesize vessels of $8,600 per vessel per day. This represents the daily rateshort term funding requirements, our vessels must earn to cover payment of budgeted operating costs (including corporate overheads), estimated interest and scheduled loan principal repayments. This rate does not take into account loan balloon repayments at maturity, which we expect to refinance with new loans.

The liquidity requirements of the Company include funding the replacement ofnewbuilding vessels, through the acquisition of second hand vessels or newbuildingsecond-hand vessels and the repayment of long-term debt balances. The Company's

Knightsbridge

Knightsbridge’s sources of capital have been the proceeds of its initial public offering, the underwritten public offering in September 2010,subsequent equity offerings, bank loans, proceeds from the sale of vessels and charter hire income. The Company expects that charter hire paid from time charters and voyage charters will be sufficient sources of income for the Company to continue to pay ordinary recurring expenses including installments due on outstanding borrowings. We believe our working capital is sufficient for the Company's present requirements.

As of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, 2011 and 2010, the CompanyKnightsbridge had cash and cash equivalents of $79.3$42.2 million, $46.8$98.3 million and $56.8$79.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, 2011 and 2010, the CompanyKnightsbridge had restricted cash of $18.9 million, $15.0 million

40



and $15.0 million, respectively, which is a minimum liquidity balance we arethat Knightsbridge was required to maintain at all times under the Company'sKnightsbridge's loan facilities.

Net cash provided by operating activities in the year ended December 31, 2014 was $24.9 million compared with net cash provided by operations of $12.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2013. Knightsbridge's reliance on the spot market and index-related time charters contributes to fluctuations in cash flows from operating activities as a result of its exposure to volatile Capesize vessel rates. Any increase or decrease in the average rates earned by Knightsbridge's vessels in periods subsequent to December 31, 2014, compared with the actual rates achieved during 2014, will have a positive or negative comparative impact, respectively, on the amount of cash provided by operating activities.

Knightsbridge's Newbuildings

In April 2014, Knightsbridge acquired five SPCs from Frontline 2012, each owning a fuel efficient 180,000 dwt Capesize dry bulk newbuilding and a subsidiary of Knightsbridge acquired a 2013-built Capesize dry bulk carrier, Bulk China (renamed KSL China), from Karpasia. The consideration consisted of the issuance of 15.5 million and 3.1 million shares, which were recorded at a price of $12.54 per share, to Frontline 2012 and Hemen (on behalf of Karpasia), respectively, $150.0 million was assumed in remaining newbuilding instalments in connection with the SPCs acquired from Frontline 2012 and $24.0 million was paid in cash to Karpsasia. Cash of $43.4 million was acquired on the purchase of the SPCs. Two of the five Capesize newbuildings, KSL Seattle and KSL Singapore, were delivered in May 2014 and the remaining three, KSL Sapporo, KSL Sydney and KSL Salvador, were delivered in June, July and September 2014, respectively. The 2013-built Capesize dry bulk carrier was delivered in April 2014.

In April 2014, Knightsbridge agreed to acquire 25 SPCs from Frontline 2012, each owning a fuel efficient dry bulk newbuilding. In September 2014, Knightsbridge acquired 13 of these SPCs and one of these Capesize newbuildings, KSL Santiago, was delivered from the yard in September 2014. The consideration for these SPCs consisted of the issuance of 31.0 million shares. The issuance of the 31 million shares was recorded at an aggregate value of $356.8 million based on the closing price of $11.51 per share on September 15, the closing date of the transaction. $490.0 million was assumed in remaining newbuilding installments and cash of $25.1 million was acquired on the purchase of the SPCs. Two of the Capesize newbuildings, KSL San Francisco and KSL Santos, were delivered from the yard in October 2014.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, we2014, Knightsbridge paid total$357.4 million in connection with its newbuilding program and paid cash distributions of $29.3$29.0 million.


37



In March 2013, the Company concluded two newbuilding contracts for 182,000 dwt Capesize bulk carriers with JMU in Japan. The vessels are expected to be delivered to the Company during 2015. As of the dateDecember 31, 2014, Knightsbridge was committed to make newbuilding installments of this annual report, we have paid $15.4$548.7 million in installments and have aggregate purchase commitments of $87.0 million relating to our two Capesize newbuilding contracts with expected payments of $5.1 million and $81.9 millionpayment in 2014 and 2015, respectively. We expect to finance these payments with cash on hand, operating cash flow and bank debt that we intend to arrange. See Item 3 "Key Information - Risk Factors".2015.

Borrowing activities

In March 2004, we refinanced a prior debt facility with a $140.0 million credit facility with five tranches of $28.0 million, each in respect to a VLCC in the fleet at the time. One tranche was repaid upon the sale of the related vessel in 2007. The credit facility was secured by, among other things, a mortgage on each VLCC and an assignment of any charter in respect to that VLCC. The facility was repayable over seven years. The credit facility bore interest at LIBOR plus a margin. During 2007, we obtained an extension of the $140 million loan with two tranches of $16.8 million each (the "Pre-delivery Loan"), subject to the same covenants as the $140 million loan, in order to fund the first installments on the two Capesize newbuildings. These tranches were repaid uponJanuary 2015, Knightsbridge took delivery of four Capesize dry bulk newbuildings, the CapesizeKSL Sakura, KSL Seville, KSL Seoul and Golden Kathrine, which were purchased from Frontline 2012 in September 2014. In connection with the four vessels which took placefinal installments of $153.0 million, in Augustaggregate, were paid and October 2009. The outstanding balance on the $140 million loan was repaid in full in July 2010.

In August 2009, the Company entered into a four year term loan facility agreement consisting of two tranches of $30.0 million each, (the "$60 Million Loan"). In August 2009,or $120.0 million in aggregate, were drawn down from the Company drew down $30.0$420.0 million to fund the final instalment due on delivery of the first Capesize newbuilding and the repayment of the first tranche of the Pre-delivery Loan. In October 2009, the Company drew down the second tranche of $30.0 million under the term loan to fund the final instalment due on delivery of the second Capesize newbuilding and the repayment of the second tranche of the Pre-delivery Loan. The loans were secured by, among other things, a mortgage on the Capesize vessels and an assignment of any charters in respect to those vessels. The $60 Million Loan bore interest at LIBOR plus a margin. In July 2010, the Company amended the $60 Million Loan and increased the total amount under the credit facility to $105 million at which time, the Company drew down $47.5 million. The terms of the loan were amended in order to finance the purchase of a Capesize vessel and cover fees and expenses related to the acquisition. The August 2009 loan was refinanced with the senior secured term loan facility entered intosigned in December 2010.June 2014 (see Knightsbridge'sBorrowing Activities below).

In March 2015, Knightsbridge took delivery of the Capesize dry bulk newbuilding, KSL Stockholm, which was purchased from Frontline 2012 in September 2014. The final installment of $36.4 million was paid at this time and $28.6 million was drawn down from the $420.0 million term loan facility.

In March 2015, Knightsbridge acquired the remaining 12 SPCs from Frontline 2012 and issued 31.0 million shares as consideration. Knightsbridge assumed net newbuilding commitments of $404.0 million in respect of these newbuilding contracts, net of a cash payment from Frontline 2012 of $108.6 million, with expected payment of $163.3 million in 2015 and $240.7 million in 2016.

As of March 31, 2015, just prior to completion of the Merger, Knightsbridge was committed to make newbuilding installments of $847.5 million with expected payment of $459.8 million in 2015 and $387.7 million in 2016.

Knightsbridge's Borrowing Activities

$58.24 Million Credit Facility

In July 2010, the CompanyKnightsbridge entered into a $58.24 million credit facility consisting of four tranches of $14.56 million each relating to the VLCC vessels in the fleet to refinance the outstanding balance of $56 million of debt under its previous $140 million loan facility. The loan is secured by, among other things, a first priority mortgage on the applicable vessel. This loan iswas repayable on a quarterly basis with a balloon payment at the final maturity date June 2015 and hashad an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin.

41



During 2012, $38.0 million of this loan was repaid as a result of the sales of the VLCCs Hampstead, Titan Venus and Kensington, in September, October and November 2012, respectively. The sales of these VLCCs generated net cash, after the repayment of debt, of approximately $28 million. As of December 31, 2012, we had $12.4 million of outstanding borrowings under this facility with no available, undrawn amount. The remaining outstanding balance on this facility has beenwas repaid in the second quarter of 2013 upon the sale of the VLCC Mayfair.

$175 Million Credit Facility

In December 2010, the CompanyKnightsbridge refinanced its previous $105 million loan facility and entered into a $175 million credit facility consisting of four tranches of $25.0 million, each relating to eacha Capesize vessel, and a revolving debt facility of $75 million. The loan is secured by, among other things, a first priority mortgage on the applicable vessel. The loan is repayable in May 2015 and has an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin.margin of 2.50%. In May 2013, the revolving debt facility of $75.0 million was reduced to $40.0 million. In May 2014, the repayment profile of the $135.0 million term loan facility was changed from a balloon payment of the full amount in May 2015 to four quarterly installments commencing in May 2015, each equal to 1/48 of the outstanding loan amount, and a balloon payment for the remaining balance in May 2016. During 2014, $30.0 million was drawn down from this facility to part finance the 2013-built Capesize bulk carrier, Bulk China (renamed KSL China), purchased from Karpasia in April 2014 with a similar repayment profile to that agreed in May 2014. As of December 31, 2012, we had $99.32014, $125.0 million ofwas outstanding borrowings underon this facility. The revolving debt facility of $75and $10.0 million was available for vessel acquisitions but undrawnundrawn.

$420.0 Million Term Loan Facility

In June 2014, Knightsbridge entered into a term loan facility of up to $420.0 million, depending on the market values of the vessels at the time of draw down, consisting of fourteen tranches of $30.0 million to finance, in part, fourteen of its newbuildings. Each tranche is repayable by quarterly installments of $375,000 and all amounts outstanding shall be repaid on the final maturity date, which will be no later than 72 months after the first draw down date or June 2020. The final draw down date must be no later than October 2016. The loan has an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.50%. Knightsbridge drew down six tranches of $30.0 million each in the third quarter of 2014 as part financing of the KSL Seattle, KSL Sapporo, KSL Sydney, KSL Singapore, KSL Salvador and KSL Santiago anddrew down two tranches of $30.0 million each in the fourth quarter of 2014 as part financing of the KSL San Francisco and KSL Santos. Also in the fourth quarter, Knightsbridge paid four installments of $375,000 each. As of December 31, 2012.2014, $238.5 million was outstanding on this facility and the available, undrawn amount was $180.0 million.

CertainIn January 2015, Knightsbridge took delivery of four Capesize dry bulk newbuildings, the KSL Sakura, KSL Seville, KSL Seoul and Golden Kathrine, which were purchased from Frontline 2012 in September 2014,and drew down four tranches of $30.0 million each, or $120.0 million in aggregate. In March 2015, Knightsbridge took delivery of the Company'sCapesize dry bulk newbuilding, KSL Stockholm, which was purchased from Frontline 2012 in September 2014, and drew down $28.6 million. Knightsbridge paid eight installments of $375,000 each in the first quarter of 2015. As of March 31, 2015, $384.1 million was outstanding on this facility and the available, undrawn amount was $30.0 million.

$425.0 Million Senior Secured Post-Delivery Term Facility

In February 2015, an agreement was signed between Knightsbridge (as guarantor), various SPCs (as borrowers), a syndicate of banks and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. as agent for a senior secured post-delivery term loan agreements containfacility of up to $425.0 million, depending on the market values of the vessels at the time of draw down, to partially finance 14 newbuilding vessels. The facility is divided into 12 tranches of $30.0 million and two tranches of $32.5 million. Each tranche is repayable in consecutive quarterly installments commencing three months after draw down with a twenty year profile and all amounts must be fully repaid by March 31, 2021, at the latest. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00%. The loan agreement contains financial covenants, including free cash of a certain amount, a requirement for positive working capital and a value adjusted equity to adjusted total assets ratio.

Knightsbridge’s Loan Covenants

Each Knightsbridge loan agreement contains a loan-to-value clauses,clause, which could require the Companyit to post collateral or prepay a portion of the outstanding borrowings should the value of the vessels securing borrowings under each of such agreements decrease below a required levels.level. In addition, the loan agreements contain certain financial covenants, including the requirement to maintain a certain level of free cash.cash, positive working capital and a value adjusted equity covenant. The loans also include cross default provisions. Failure to comply with any of the covenants in the loan agreements could result in a default, under those agreements and under other agreements containing cross-default provisions. A defaultwhich would permit lendersthe lender to accelerate the maturity of the debt under these agreements and to foreclose upon any collateral securing thatthe debt. Under those circumstances, the Companywe might not have sufficient funds or other resources to satisfy itsour obligations. The Company was in compliance with all of the financial and other covenants contained in the Company's loan agreements as of December 31, 2012.


42



In addition, pursuant to the Company's $58.24 million and $175 million credit facilities, none of itsour vessel owning subsidiaries may sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of their interests in the vessels they own without the prior written consent of the applicable lenders unless, in the case of a vessel sale, the outstanding borrowings under the credit facility applicable to that vessel are repaid in full.


38Knightsbridge was in compliance with all of the financial and other covenants contained in its loan agreements as of December 31, 2014.



Equity offeringsOther Activities

Knightsbridge has claims for unpaid charter hire owed by Titan Petrochemicals Limited with respect to its bareboat charters of the Titan Venus and Mayfair. Knightsbridge is also seeking recovery of damages for the remaining periods of these charter contracts. The aggregate amount of these claims is approximately $2.4 million. Knightsbridge is unable to predict the outcome of this case at this time.

In March 2014 and June 2014, Knightsbridge received $9.7 million and $3.2 million, respectively, as partial settlement of claims for unpaid charter hire and damages for Golden Zhejiang. $1.9 million of the amount received in March 2014 was recorded as time charter revenue as it related to unrecognized time charter revenue in respect of services previously rendered. The balance of $7.8 million and the full amount received in June 2014 was recorded as other operating income. These amounts were received in connection with a claim that was lodged jointly with another claimant's claim against the same defendant. Knightsbridge received a payment of $3.3 million in October 2014 and received a final payment of $3.1 million in December 2014. Both amounts were recognized as other operating income in the fourth quarter of 2014.

In February 2014 and April 2014, Knightsbridge received $0.2 million and $0.1 million as final settlements for unpaid charter hire for Battersea and recorded these amounts as other operating income.
Knightsbridge's Equity offering

On September 27, 2010, the CompanyOctober 17, 2013, Knightsbridge announced an underwrittena public offering of 4,250,0006,000,000 common shares and a 30 day option granted to the underwritersbook-running manager to purchase up to 637,500 additional common shares to cover overallotments.representing 15% of the offered shares. The offering was priced at $19.00$9.00 per share and the underwriters exercised the over-allotment option in full.book-running manager did not exercise its option. As a result, 4,887,5006,000,000 common shares were issued in October 2013 and Knightsbridge received net proceeds of approximately $87.6 million were received. $51.2 million. Knightsbridge used the net proceeds of this offering to partially fund the acquisition of newbuilding vessels and for general corporate purposes.

The proceedsFormer Golden Ocean

The Former Golden Ocean’s sources of capital have been used to fund a portionthe proceeds of its initial public offering, subsequent equity offerings, bank loans, convertible bonds, debt financing, proceeds from the sale of vessels and charter hire income. Restricted cash balances of the purchase priceFormer Golden Ocean mainly relate to margin calls on derivatives positions or minor amounts secured for tax payments or for claims processes.

The Former Golden Ocean’s Borrowing Activities

$201.4 Million Credit Facility

In June 2008, the Former Golden Ocean entered into a $201.4 million credit facility to cover pre- and post-delivery financing of four vessels under construction at Jinhaiwan. Two of the vessels, Golden ZhejiangZheijang and Golden Future were later sold and the remainderfacility now relates to two vessels, Golden Zhoushan and Golden Beijing. The loan is secured by, among other things, a first priority mortgage on the applicable vessel. This loan is repayable via quarterly payments of $1.0 million and a balloon payment at the final maturity date December 31, 2017 of $34.4 million and bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75%. During 2011 and 2012, $27.5 million of this loan was repaid under the minimum value clause as a result of decreasing vessel values. As of December 31, 2014, $46.4 million was outstanding under this facility and there was no available, undrawn amount.

$33.93 Million Credit Facility

In May 2013, the Former Golden Ocean entered into a $33.93 million credit facility to cover post-delivery financing of two vessels bought from third parties but delivered directly after construction at Pipavav shipyard in India, Golden Pearl and Golden Diamond. The loan is secured by, among other things, a first priority mortgage on the applicable vessel. This loan is repayable via quarterly payments of $0.6 million with a balloon payment at the final maturity date May 27, 2018 of $22.6 million and bears interest at

43



LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75%. As of December 31, 2014, $31.1 million was outstanding under this facility and there was no available, undrawn amount.

$82.5 Million Credit Facility

In October 2013, the Former Golden Ocean refinanced its previous $224 million loan facility and entered into a $82.5 million credit facility consisting of six tranches relating to two Capesize vessels, Channel Alliance and Channel Navigator, and four Panamax vessels, Golden Strength, Golden Ice, Golden Saguenay and Golden Opportunity. The loan is secured by, among other things, a first priority mortgage on the applicable vessel. The loan is repayable via quarterly payments of $2.9 million until February 2016 and $1.4 million thereafter with a balloon payment on October 31, 2018 of $37.3 million.The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 2.75%. As of December 31, 2014, $70.8 million was outstanding under this facility and there was no available, undrawn amount.

$23.8 Million Credit Facility

In September 2013, the Former Golden Ocean entered into a $23.8 million credit facility to part finance the Capesize vessel Golden Magnum purchased together with a partner in May 2013, but in 2014 bought entirely by the Former Golden Ocean. The loan is secured by, among other things, a first priority mortgage on the applicable vessel. This loan is repayable via quarterly payments of $0.2 million until September 2015 and $0.6 million thereafter with a balloon payment at the final maturity date September 13, 2018 of $14.9 million. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 2.65%. As of December 31, 2014, $22.6 million was outstanding under this facility and there was no available, undrawn amount.

$284.0 Million Credit Facility

In December 2014, the Former Golden Ocean entered into a $284.0 million credit facility to (i) part finance four unfinanced vessels, Golden Ruby, Golden Ginger, Golden Rose and Golden Daisy, (ii) refinance ten vessels, Golden Eminence, Golden Endeavour, Golden Brilliant, Golden Bull, Golden Suek, Golden Empress, Golden Endurer, Golden Enterprise, Golden Feng and Golden Shui, and (iii) provide post-delivery financing of five vessels under construction at JMU in Japan and Chengxi in China, Golden Cecilie, Golden Cathrine, Golden Aries, Golden Gemini and Golden Taurus. The loan is secured by, among other things, a first priority mortgage on the applicable vessel. This loan is repayable on a quarterly basis with a balloon payment at the final maturity date December 31, 2019 and has an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00%. No drawing under the facility was made as of December 31, 2014. As of March 31, 2015, $260.45 million has been drawn under the facility in connection with eighteen of the vessels. $15.0 million was available in connection with the last newbuilding, with expected delivery during the second quarter of 2015, and was undrawn at March 31, 2015.

$200.0 Million Convertible Bond

In January 2015, the Former Golden Ocean issued a $200.0 million convertible bond with a five year tenor and coupon of 3.07% per year. The initial conversion price was $2.78 per share and was to be adjusted for dividend payments from the Former Golden Ocean. The convertible bond has no regular repayments and matures in full on January 27, 2019. There are no financial covenants in the convertible bond agreement. At the time of the Merger, we assumed the convertible bond and the conversion price was adjusted based on the exchange ratio in the Merger.

The Former Golden Ocean's Loan Covenants

As a result of the Merger, the financial covenants in the Former Golden Ocean's loan agreements have been amended such that they are now the same as the financial covenants in the Knightsbridge's loan agreements.

Other

During 2012 and 2013, the Former Golden Ocean cancelled nine newbuilding contracts at Jinhaiwan and all of the cancellations were taken to arbitration by the shipyard. The Former Golden Ocean received positive awards on all contracts during 2014 and received $103.6 million during 2014 in respect of installments paid and accrued interest on three contracts. There were appeals to the High Court in London on the remaining contracts and the Former Golden Ocean was awarded full repayment on all remaining contracts at the end of 2014. The Former Golden Ocean received $72 million in the first quarter of 2015, in respect of installments paid and accrued interest on four of the six appealed contracts and used $9.6 million of this amount to repay debt. In April 2015, the Former Golden Ocean received a final refund of $40.1 million on the two remaining appealed contracts. There was no debt associated with these last two contracts.


44



As of March 31, 2015, just prior to completion of the Merger, the Former Golden Ocean was committed to make newbuilding installments of $88.0 million with expected payment of $31.0 million in 2015 and $57.0 million in 2016.

Recent Developments following the Merger

In April 2015, we agreed to the sale of two vessels, Channel Alliance and Channel Navigator, which were acquired as a result of the Merger, to an unrelated third party.The vessels are expected to be delivered to the buyer by the end of June 2015. Net cash proceeds are expected to be $16.8 million from which we will repay debt of $14.3 million.

In April 2015, we agreed to the sale of four newbuilding Capesize vessels, which were owned by us prior to the completion of the Merger and are currently under construction at a Chinese yard. We will complete the construction of these newbuildings and each vessel is expected to be delivered to the buyer following its delivery to us (two in 2015 and two in 2016). We will time charter-in three of the vessels for periods between six and twelve months. Sale proceeds of $92.4 million are expected to be received in 2015 and in 2016 ($184.8 million in aggregate). We do not expect to fund these newbuilding vessels with any debt prior to delivery to the new owners.

In April 2015, we agreed to a sale and leaseback transaction with Ship Finance for eight Capesize vessels. Five of these vessels (KSL China, Battersea, Belgravia, Golden Future and Golden Zhejiang) were owned by us prior to the completion of the Merger and three vessels (Golden Zhoushan, Golden Beijing and Golden Magnum) were acquired as a result of the Merger. These vessels were built in Korea and China between 2009 and 2013 and will be sold en-bloc for an aggregate price of $272.0 million or $34.0 million per vessel on average. $192.8 million of the sale proceeds will be used to repay indebtedness, fund future vessel acquisitions,debt. The vessels are expected to be delivered to Ship Finance in July 2015, subject to customary closing conditions. The vessels will be time chartered-in by one of our subsidiaries for a period of 10 years. The daily time charter rate will be $17,600 during the first seven years and $14,900 thereafter. In addition, 33% of our profit from revenues above the daily time charter rate will be calculated and paid on a quarterly basis to Ship Finance. We will have a purchase option of $112 million en-bloc after 10 years and, if such option is not exercised, Ship Finance will have the option to extend the charters by 3 years at $14,900 per day.

As of March 31, 2015, after completion of the Merger, we were committed to make newbuilding installments of $935.5 million with expected payment of $490.8 million in 2015 and $444.7 million in 2016. Subsequent to March 31, 2015, we have reached agreements with several of our yards to delay the delivery dates of 17 newbuildings by 73 months in aggregate. These changes resulted in an increase in newbuilding commitments of $1.1 million such that, as of the date of this annual report, we were committed to make newbuilding installments of $936.6 million with expected payments of $330.7 million, $471.4 million and $134.5 million in 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. We refer you to the risk factor entitled "We will need to procure additional financing in order to complete the construction of our newbuilding vessels, which may be difficult to obtain on acceptable terms or at all.”

As of April 29, 2015, we are of the opinion that our working capital, committed financing and anticipated financing on newbuildings is sufficient for general corporate purposes.
In July and October 2010,our current requirements (including newbuilding installments) for at least the Company purchased two 2010-built Capesize dry bulk carriers, Golden Future and Golden Zhejiang, from Golden Ocean. Golden Future was purchased for $47.0 million in cash and 1,464,515 shares with a value of $25.0 million. Golden Zhejiang was purchased for $47.0 million in cash and 973,684 shares with a value of $18.5 million.next twelve months.

C. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES, ETC

We do not undertake any significant expenditure on research and development, and have no significant interests in patents or licenses.
 
D. TREND INFORMATION
 
The oil tanker and dry bulk industriesmarket behaved differently during 2014 compared with previous years in many aspects. Traditionally, the seasonal pattern has been a slow start to the year due to adverse weather in the Southern hemisphere, while the fourth quarter normally provides more energy with restocking of both iron ore and coal. The first quarter of 2014 started on a high note, however, with the Baltic Dry Index, or BDI, averaging 1,371 and this was followed by 28 percent and three percent declines in the following two quarters. The negative trend reversed during October and November and there were gains during December. Overall, the average BDI for 2014 was down by six percent compared to the previous year, making 2014 the second worst year on record since 1999. Capesize vessels earned on average $14,335 per day in the fourth quarter of 2014 compared to $12,635 per day in the previous quarter and $27,071 in fourth quarter of 2013.

Chinese industrial production increased by 8.5 percent in 2014 as compared to 9.5 percent in 2013. The Chinese leadership seems to be fairly comfortable with lower GDP growth, but is still indicating that their growth target for the coming three years is within a six to seven percent range. This is still acceptable if it materializes, given the size of the Chinese economy but it is expected that there will be a shift towards more consumer focused growth rather than infrastructure driven projects.


45



Chinese steel consumption experienced a small decline in 2014 compared to a nine percent growth in 2013. Steel production, however, was helped by a strong growth in steel exports and increased by 1.5 percent in 2014. Annualized steel exports in November and December was approximately 115 million mt.

Expectations were high for seaborne transportation of iron ore in 2014, based on additional supply, in particular, from the miners in Australia. Iron ore imports to China increased by approximately 100 million mt in 2014 and total iron ore imports to the country reached 925 million mt, which was in line with forecaster's expectations.

What derailed the dry bulk freight market recovery were the lack of coal demand from China, the relief of the grain port congestion in South America compared to 2013 and the after effect of the stock piling ahead of the Indonesian ban on raw ore (nickel ore and bauxite) exports.

Approximately 8.5 million dwt of new dry bulk capacity was delivered during fourth quarter of 2014, compared to 11.8 million dwt in third quarter. Approximately 15.5 million dwt was removed from the tonnage list during 2014 and this was fairly evenly spread over the year. The delivery ratio compared to the official order book at the beginning of 2014 was very similar to that of the last couple of years. A delivery ratio compared to the official order book of just below 80 percent resulted in 47.5 million mt of new capacity. A total of 600 vessels above 10,000 dwt were delivered in 2014 and 285 such vessels were removed, resulting in a net fleet growth of 5.2 percent measured in carrying capacity.

The downward pressure on asset prices continued during the fourth quarter of 2014. Capesize values that had been more robust in the previous two quarters experienced a stronger negative correction than the smaller segments. According to sale and purchase brokers, the values of modern vessels (maximum five years old) were approximately 12 percent lower by the end of the year as compared to the end of September 2014.

Three months into 2015, the freight market has continued its negative trend with the BDI falling to an all-time low in February 2015. With owners not even covering their operating expenses, ordering of new capacity is not being considered and shipyards have secured very few new orders in the last three months. In addition, scrapping activity has picked up. During the first fifteen weeks of this year, 37 Capesize vessels have been highly cyclical, experiencing volatilitycommitted to scrap buyers as compared to 26 Capesize vessels in charter hire rates and vessel values resulting from changesall of 2014.

Most analysts expect the average spot earnings in 2015 to be in line with spot earnings in 2014.

The main downside risks are considered to be a quicker than expected change in the Chinese energy mix and a slower than expected process in restructuring China's domestic iron ore industry. Upside potential should derive from Chinese economic stimulus, supply dynamics (scrapping/cancellations of new buildings), a positive effect from lower oil prices on global economy and demand for crude oil and tanker capacity, dry bulk cargoes and dry bulk vessels. See "Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – A. Operating Results".a strong grain season in South America could lead to higher congestion.

E. OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

None.The Former Golden Ocean guarantees debt and other obligations of certain of its equity method investees. The debt and other obligations are primarily due to banks in connection with financing the purchase of vessels and equipment used in the joint venture operations. As of December 31, 2014, the joint venture owning the Golden Opus had total bank debt outstanding of $19.9 million and the Former Golden Ocean had guaranteed 50% of this amount. Consequently, the maximum potential liability was $9.95 million as of December 31, 2014. The carrying amount of this liability in the unaudited balance sheet of the Former Golden Ocean at December 31, 2014 was nil.

Apart from the above, we are not subject to any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition.

F. TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

At December 31, 20122014, the CompanyKnightsbridge had the following contractual obligations:

46



Payment due by periodPayment due by period
  Less than
     More than
  Less than
     More than
(In thousands of $)Total
 one year
 1-3 years
 3-5 years
 5 years
(in thousands of $)Total
 one year
 1-3 years
 3-5 years
 5 years
Debt (1)111,678
 4,700
 106,978
 
 
363,500
 19,812
 153,188
 190,500
 
Newbuilding installments548,653
 548,653
 
 
 
Total contractual cash obligations111,678
 4,700
 106,978
 
 
912,153
 568,465
 153,188
 190,500
 

(1)All of the Company'sKnightsbridge's loan facilities are at floating interest rates based on LIBOR plus a margin and the CompanyKnightsbridge has not entered into any interest rate swaps. The amounts included above do not include interest payments.

InAs of December 31, 2014, Knightsbridge was committed to the second stage of the Frontline 2012 Vessel Transaction. This was completed in March 2013,2015, at which time Knightsbridge issued 31.0 million shares, priced at $4.10 per share based on the Company concluded two newbuilding contracts for 182,000 dwt Capesize bulk carriers. As ofclosing share price on the date of this annual report, the Company had purchasetransaction, to Frontline 2012 and assumed newbuilding commitments of $87.0$404.0 million, relating to its two Capesize newbuilding contracts with expected payments net of $5.1 million and $81.9 million in 2014 and 2015, respectively.a cash payment from Frontline 2012 of $108.6 million. No other working capital balances were acquired.

G. SAFE HARBOR
 
Forward-looking information discussed in this Item 5 includes assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions and beliefs about future events. These statements are intended as "forward-looking statements." We caution that assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions and beliefs about future events may and often do vary from actual results and the differences can be material. Please see "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" in this report.
 
ITEM 6.  DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

A.  DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

Set forth below are the names and positions of theour directors and executive officers of the Company.officers.


39



The Company
Name Age Position
Ola Lorentzon 6365 Director and Chairman
Douglas C. WolcottHans Petter Aas 8169 Director and Audit Committee member
Herman Billung57Director and Chief Executive Officer of Golden Ocean Management AS
Robert D. Somerville71Director
David M. White 7274 Director and Audit Committee Chairman
Hans Petter Aas67Director
Herman BillungGert-Jan van der Akker 55 Director
Inger M. KlempKate Blankenship 50 Director and Audit Committee member
John Fredriksen70Director
Birgitte Ringstad Vartdal38Chief Financial Officer of Golden Ocean Management AS
Georgina Sousa 6365 Company Secretary

Pursuant toOur Amended and Restated Bye-Laws, or the Amended General Management Agreement withand Restated Bye-Laws, provide that the Company,Board shall consist of not less than two members and shall at all times comprise a majority of directors who are not residents in the General Manager provides management and advisory services to the Company.  Set forth below are the names and positionsUnited Kingdom.
The Knightsbridge Board consisted of the directors, executive officers and officersfollowing members: Ola Lorentzon (Chairman), Hans Petter Aas, Herman Billung, Robert D. Somerville, David M. White.
Following completion of the General Manager.

NameAgePosition
Inger M. Klemp50Director and President
Kate Blankenship48Director
Graham Baker53Director

Directors of bothMerger, Kate Blankenship, John Fredriksen and Gert-Jan van der Akker were also appointed as directors on the Company and the General Manager are elected annually, and each director elected holds office until a successor is elected.  Officers of both the Company and the General Manager are elected from time to time by vote of the respective board of directors and hold office until a successor is elected.  Certain biographical information with respect to each director and executive officer of the Company and the General Manager is set forth below.

Board.
Ola Lorentzon is currently Chairman of the Board and has beenserved as a director of the CompanyBoard since September 18, 1996, Chairman since May 26, 2000 and our Chief Executive Officer sincefrom May 5, 2010.2010 until March 31, 2015. Mr. Lorentzon is also a director of Erik Thun AB and Laurin Shipping AB.  Mr. Lorentzon was the Managing Director of Frontline Management AS, a subsidiary of Frontline, from April 2000 until September 2003.

47



Douglas C. WolcottHans Petter Aas currently serves as a director of the Board and has served as a director since September 2008. Mr. Aas has been a director of the CompanyShip Finance International Limited since September 18, 1996.August 2008 and Chairman since January 2009. Mr. Wolcott has also served as President of Chevron Shipping Corporation until 1994.  Mr. Wolcott previously served as Deputy Chairman and director of the United Kingdom Protection and Indemnity Club and as a director of London & Overseas Freighters Limited.  He is currently a director of the American Bureau of Shipping.

David M. WhiteAas has been a director of the CompanyGolar LNG Limited since September 18, 1996.  Mr. White was Chairman of Dan White Investment Limited which is now closed.  Mr. White has also served as2008 and a director of NatWest Equity Primary Markets Limited from January 1992 toGolar LNG Partners LP since March 1996, and was previously2011. Mr. Aas is also a director of both NatWest Markets Corporate Finance LimitedKnutsen NYK Offshore Tankers AS, Knutsen NYK Offshore Partners LLC, Solvang ASA and NatWest Markets Securities Limited until December 1991.Gearbulk Holding Limited. Mr. Aas had a long career as banker in the international shipping and offshore market, and retired from his position as Global Head of the Shipping, Offshore and Logistics Division of DnB NOR Bank ASA, or DnB NOR, in August 2008. He joined DnB NOR (then Bergen Bank) in 1989, and has previously worked for the Petroleum Division of the Norwegian Ministry of Industry and the Ministry of Energy, as well as for VestaInsurance and Nevi Finance.

Gert-Jan van der Akker was appointed a director of the Board following the completion of the Merger. Mr. van der Akker is Senior Head of Region at Louis Dreyfus Commodities. Prior to joining Louis Dreyfus Commodities earlier this year, he had 27 years of experience at Cargill where his last position was a platform leader for the global energy, transportation and metals platform.
 
Herman Billung currently serves as a director of the Board and has beenserved as a director since September 2010.2010 and is the Chief Executive Officer of Golden Ocean Management AS. Mr. Billung has served as Chief Executive Officer of Golden Ocean Management AS since April 1, 2005. Mr. Billung's previous position was as Managing Director of Maritime Services in The Torvald Klaveness Group, responsible for the commercial management of the group's dry bulk pools, Bulkhandling and Baumarine. Mr. Billung was Managing Director of the dry bulk operating company, Frapaco Shipping Ltd. between 1994 and 1998. Mr. Billung graduated from the Royal Norwegian Naval Academy in 1984.
Hans Petter Aas has been a director of the Company since September 2008. Mr. Aas has been a director of Ship Finance International Limited since August 2008 and Chairman since January 2009. Mr. Aas has been a director of Golar LNG Limited since September 2008 and a director of Golar LNG Partners LP since March 2011. Mr. Aas is also a director of Knutsen NYK Offshore Tankers AS, Gearbulk Holding Limited and the Norwegian Export Credit Guaranty Institute. Mr. Aas had a long career as banker in the international shipping and offshore market, and retired from his position as Global Head of the Shipping, Offshore and Logistics Division of DnB NOR Bank ASA ("DnB NOR") in August 2008. He joined DnB NOR (then Bergen Bank) in 1989, and has previously worked for the Petroleum Division of the Norwegian Ministry of Industry and the Ministry of Energy, as well as for VestaInsurance and Nevi Finance.


40



Inger M. Klemp has served as Chief Financial Officer of the Company since September 2007. Mrs. Klemp has served as Chief Financial Officer of Frontline Management AS and has been a director of the General Manager since June 1, 2006. Mrs. Klemp has served as a director of Independent Tankers Corporation Limited since February 2008. Mrs. Klemp served as Vice President Finance of Frontline Management AS from August 2001 until she was promoted in May 2006. Mrs. Klemp graduated as MSc in Business and Economics from the Norwegian School of Management (BI) in 1986. Mrs. Klemp served as Assistant Director Finance in Color Group ASA from 1998 to 2001 and as Group Financial Manager in Color Line ASA from 1992 to 1998, a Norwegian based cruise operator which was stock exchange listed until October 1999. From 1989 to 1992 Mrs. Klemp served as Assistant Vice President in Nordea Bank Norge ASA handling structuring and syndication of loan facilities in the international banking market. From 1986 to 1989, Mrs. Klemp served as a lending officer of Fokus Bank ASA.

Kate Blankenship was a director of the Former Golden Ocean and was appointed a director of the Board following the completion of the Merger. Mrs Blankenship served as our Chief Financial Officer of the Company from April 2000 to September 2007 and served as our Secretary of the Company from December 2000 to March 2007. Mrs. Blankenship has been a director of the General Manager since March 2000. Mrs. Blankenship served as the Chief Accounting Officer and Secretary of Frontline between 1994 and October 2005. Mrs. Blankenship also serves as a director of Golar LNG Limited, Golar LNG Partners LP, Ship Finance International Limited, Seadrill Limited, Seadrill Partners LLC, Archer Limited, Golden Ocean Group Limited, Independent Tankers Corporation Limited, Avance Gas Holding Ltd and Frontline 2012 Ltd..Ltd. She is a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.

Graham BakerJohn Fredriksen was a director of the Former Golden Ocean and was appointed a director of the Board following the completion of the Merger. Mr. Fredriksen has served as Chairman, President and a director of Seadrill Limited since 2005. Mr. Fredriksen has established trusts for the benefit of his immediate family which indirectly control Hemen. Mr. Fredriksen is Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Frontline. He has served also as a director of Frontline 2012 Ltd. since December 2011.

Robert D. Somerville currently serves asa director of the Board and has been a director since September 20, 2013. Mr. Somerville was the President or Chairman of the General ManagerAmerican Bureau of Shipping, or ABS, for 20 years to April 2013. Mr. Somerville also serves as a director of GasLog Ltd., Keppel Offshore & Marine Limited and is Vice Chairman of the Maine Maritime Academy Board of Trustees.

David M. White currently serves asa director of the Board and has been a director since September 18, 1996.  Mr. White was Chairman of Dan White Investment Limited which is now closed.  Mr. White has also served as a director of NatWest Equity Primary Markets Limited from January 1992 to March 1996, and was previously a director of both NatWest Markets Corporate Finance Limited and NatWest Markets Securities Limited until December 6, 2006. Mr. Baker is Chief Accounting Officer of Frontline having joined the company in July 2006. Prior to joining Frontline, Mr. Baker was the Head of Group Reporting at NTL Inc., a large NASDAQ listed company and before that was the European1991.

Birgitte Ringstad Vartdal has served as Chief Financial Officer of DVI Inc., a NYSE listed group. HeGolden Ocean Management AS since June 21, 2010. Mrs. Vartdal previous position was Vice President, Investments, in the Torvald Klaveness Group. She has held several positions within the Torvald Klaveness Group, as VP Head of Commercial Controlling, Risk Manager and Financial Analyst. Before this she was Structuring Analyst in Hydro Energy. Mrs. Vartdal is a memberdirector of Sevan Drilling ASA, a subsidiary of Seadrill Limited. Birgitte Ringstad Vartdal holds the Institutedegree of Chartered AccountantsSiv.Ing. (MSc) in EnglandPhysics and WalesMathematics from the Norwegian University of Science and the Association of Corporate Treasurers.Technology (NTNU) and an MSc in Financial Mathematics from Heriot-Watt University, Scotland.

Georgina E. Sousa has served as our Secretary of the Company since March 15, 2007 and has been employed by Frontline since February 2007.  Mrs. Sousa is also a director of Frontline, Frontline 2012 Ltd. and North Atlantic Drilling Ltd. Mrs. Sousa was a director of the Former Golden Ocean at the completion date of the Merger. Prior to joining Frontline, Mrs. Sousa was Vice-President-Corporate Services of Consolidated Services Limited, a Bermuda management company having joined that firm in 1993 as Manager of Corporate Administration.  From 1976 to 1982 she was employed by the Bermuda law firm of Appleby, Spurling & Kempe as a Company Secretary and from 1982 to 1993 she was employed by the Bermuda law firm of Cox & Wilkinson as Senior Company Secretary.


48



B.  COMPENSATION

The CompanyKnightsbridge incurred directors' fees of $430,000 in 2012.2014.

Employment Agreement

On May 19, 2010, the CompanyKnightsbridge entered into an employment agreement with its Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Ola Lorentzon. The employment agreement hashad a term of three years, unless terminated earlier in accordance with its terms.terms, and has twice been renewed for a term of three years. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Lorentzon receives an annual base salary of $130,000 and is entitled to receive a discretionary bonus and additional incentive compensation as determined by the Knightsbridge Board.

Under the employment agreement, Mr. Lorentzon is prohibited from participating in marine transportation business activities in direct competition with us or our operating subsidiaries during the term of the employment agreement and for 12 months following its termination. Upon termination of the employment agreement by us without cause (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Lorentzon will be entitled to (i) his base salary through the date of termination, (ii) a lump sum payment equal to the aggregate of his base salary plus a discretionary bonus, based on the average of his two prior years' total compensation, or a lump sum of $130,000 if no average is available, and (iii) any amounts Mr. Lorentzon may be entitled to under the terms of the equity incentive plan.2010 Equity Incentive Plan. Following completion of the Merger, we expect to terminate this agreement and enter into an employment agreement with Mr. Lorentzon in his capacity of Chairman of the Board with an annual base salary of $130,000.

Knightsbridge's 2010 Equity Incentive Plan

The CompanyKnightsbridge adopted an equity incentive plan,the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, which we refer to as the plan,Plan, under which directors, officers, employees, consultants and service providers to the CompanyKnightsbridge and its subsidiaries and affiliates are eligible to receive options to acquire common stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and unrestricted common stock. A total of 800,000 common shares have been reserved for issuance under the plan,Plan, subject to adjustment for changes in capitalization as provided in the plan.Plan. The planPlan is administered by the Board or such committee of the Board as may be appointed by the Board to serve as planPlan administrator. The units will vest over three years at a rate of 1/3 of the number of units granted on each anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the participant continuing to provide services to the Companyus from the grant date through the applicable vesting date.

Payment upon vesting of RSUs can be in cash, in shares of common stockshares or a combination of both as determined by the Board of Directors.Board. They must be valued in an amount equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of vesting.

41



The participant shall receive a 'dividend equivalent right' with respect to each RSU entitling the participant to receive amounts equal to the ordinary dividends that would be paid during the time the RSU is outstanding and unvested on the shares of common stock underlying the RSU as if such shares were outstanding from the date of grant through the applicable vesting date of the RSU.  Such payments shall be paid to the participant at the same time at which the RSUs vesting event occurs, conditioned upon the occurrence of the vesting event.

The following table summarizes restricted stock unit transactions in the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010:2012:
 
  Number of units
  Directors
 Management companies
 Total
 Fair value
Units outstanding as of December 31, 2009 
 
 
 
Granted – December 29, 2010 29,571
 29,572
 59,143
 $22.23
Units outstanding as of December 31, 2010 29,571
 29,572
 59,143
 $22.27
Granted – December 22, 2011 46,593
 46,596
 93,189
 $13.95
Units outstanding as of December 31, 2011 76,164
 76,168
 152,332
 $13.67
Settled (9,857) (9,857) (19,714) $13.63
Units outstanding as of December 31, 2012 66,307
 66,311
 132,618
 $5.25
  Number of units
  Directors
 Management companies
 Total
 Fair value
Units outstanding as of December 31, 2011 76,164
 76,168
 152,332
 $13.67
Settled (9,857) (9,857) (19,714) $13.63
Units outstanding as of December 31, 2012 66,307
 66,311
 132,618
 $5.25
Granted 47,238
 47,238
 94,476
 $6.74
Settled (25,388) (25,388) (50,776) $9.65
Units outstanding as of December 31, 2013 88,157
 88,161
 176,318
 $9.19
Granted 27,555
 27,556
 55,111
 $9.48
Settled (41,134) (41,136) (82,270) $9.32
Units outstanding as of December 31, 2014 74,578
 74,581
 149,159
 $4.53

The fair values in the table above are the closing share prices on December 31, the share prices on the date of grant or the share prices on the date of vesting, as appropriate.

49




In May 2012, the CompanyKnightsbridge issued 11,301 common shares and paid $159,763 in cash to members of the Knightsbridge Board, of Directors and to the General Manager and the Dry bulkBulk Manager in settlement of the 19,714 RSUs that vested on December 29, 2011. The settlement represents 50%first tranche of the valueRSUs granted in common shares and 50% of the valueDecember 2010, which vested in cash for each of the directors and each of the two management companies.December 2011.

In January 2013, the CompanyKnightsbridge issued 35,061 common shares and paid $181,610 to members of the Knightsbridge Board, of Directors and to the General Manager and the Dry Bulk Manager in settlement of the first and second tranches of the RSUs granted in December 2011 and December 2010, respectively, thatwhich vested onin December 29, 2012.The settlement represents 2012. These settlements represent 50% of the value in common shares and 50% of the value in cash for each of the directors and each of the two management companies.

OnIn January 24, 2013, the Board of DirectorsKnightsbridge granted a total of 94,476 RSUs pursuant to the 2010 Equity Plan to members of the Knightsbridge Board, to the General Manager and the Dry Bulk Manager These RSUs will vest over 3 years at a rate of 1/3 of the number of RSUs granted on each anniversary of the date of grant.

In January 2014, Knightsbridge granted a total of 55,111 RSUs pursuant to the 2010 Equity Plan to members of the Board and the two management companies. These RSU's will vest over three years at a rate of 1/3 of the number of RSUs granted on each anniversary of the date of grant.

In February 2014, Knightsbridge issued 49,489 commons shares and paid $464,630 to members of the Knightsbridge Board, to the General Manager and the Dry Bulk Manager in settlement of the first, second and third tranches of the RSU's granted in January 2013, December 2011 and December 2010, respectively, which vested in January 2014 and December 2013, respectively. These settlements represent 94,47650% of the value in common shares and 50% of the value in cash for each of the directors and each of the two management companies.

In January 2015, the Knightsbridge granted a total of 49,206 RSUs pursuant to the 2010 Equity Plan to members of the Board and the two management companies. These RSUs will vest over 3 years at a rate of one third1/3 of the number of RSUs granted on each anniversary of the date of grant.

In March 2015, Knightsbridge issued 110,128 common shares in settlement of the first, second and third tranches of the RSUs granted in January 2014, January 2013, December 2011, respectively.

The Former Golden Ocean Stock Option Incentive Plan

On March 21, 2005, the Former Golden Ocean approved a share option plan under which share options may be granted to directors and eligible employees. As of March 31, 2015, there were 4,105,000 outstanding options, which were issued in October 2012 and, following completion of the Merger, were converted into 564,400 options to purchase our common shares.

C.  BOARD PRACTICES

As provided in the Company's bye-laws,Amended and Restated Bye-Laws, each director shall hold office until the next Annual General Meeting following his election or until his successor is elected. TheOur officers of the Company are elected by the Board as soon as possible following each Annual General Meeting and shall hold office for such period and on such terms as the Board may determine.

The Company hasWe have established an audit committee comprised of Mrs Blankenship and Messrs. White and Wolcott, independent directors of the Company.Aas. The audit committee is responsible for assisting the Board with its oversight responsibilities regarding the integrity of our financial statements, our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, our independent registered public accounting firm's qualifications and independence, and the performance of our internal audit functions.

There are no service contracts between us and any of our directors providing for benefits upon termination of their employment.

Board practices and exemptions from the NASDAQ corporate governance rules

As a foreign private issuer we are exempt from certain requirements of the NASDAQ Global Select Market that are applicable to domestic companies.
 
We have certified to NASDAQ that our corporate governance practices are in compliance with, and are not prohibited by, the laws of Bermuda. Accordingly, we are exempt from many of NASDAQ's corporate governance practices other than the requirements regarding the disclosure of a going concern audit opinion, submission of a listing agreement, notification of material non-compliance

50



with NASDAQ corporate governance practices and the establishment and composition of an audit committee and a formal written audit committee charter. The practices that we follow in lieu of NASDAQ's corporate governance rules are as follows:

42




OurThe Board is currently comprised by a majority of independent directors.  Under Bermuda law, we are not required to have a majority of independent directors and cannot assure you that we will continue to do so.
In lieu of holding regular meetings at which only independent directors are present, ourthe entire Board may hold regular meetings as is consistent with Bermuda law.
In lieu of an audit committee comprised of three independent directors, our audit committee has two members, which is consistent with Bermuda law.  Both members of the audit committee currently meet NASDAQ's requirement of independence.
In lieu of a nomination committee comprised of independent directors, ourthe Board is responsible for identifying and recommending potential candidates to become board members and recommending directors for appointment to board committees. Shareholders are permitted to identify and recommend potential candidates to become board members, but pursuant to the bye-laws,Amended and Restated Bye-Laws, directors are elected by the shareholders in duly convened annual or special general meetings.
In lieu of a compensation committee comprised of independent directors, ourthe Board is responsible for establishing the executive officers' compensation and benefits. Under Bermuda law, compensation of the executive officers is not required to be determined by an independent committee.
In lieu of obtaining an independent review of related party transactions for conflicts of interests, consistent with Bermuda law requirements, our bye-lawsAmended and Restated Bye-Laws do not prohibit any director from being a party to, or otherwise interested in, any transaction or arrangement with the Companyus or in which the Company iswe are otherwise interested, provided that the director makes proper disclosure of same as required by the bye-lawsAmended and Restated Bye-Laws and Bermuda law.
Prior to the issuance of securities, we are required to obtain the consent of the Bermuda Monetary Authority as required by law. We have obtained blanket consent from the Bermuda Monetary Authority for the issue and transfer of the Company'sour securities provided that such securities remain listed on a recognized stock exchange.
Pursuant to NASDAQ corporate governance rules and as a foreign private issuer, we are not required to solicit proxies or provide proxy statements to NASDAQ. Bermuda law does not require that we solicit proxies or provide proxy statements to NASDAQ. Consistent with Bermuda law and as provided in our bye-laws,the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws, we are also required to notify our shareholders of meetings no less than five days before the meeting.  Our bye-lawsAmended and Restated Bye-Laws also provide that shareholders may designate a proxy to act on their behalf.
 
Other than as noted above, we are in full compliance with all other applicable NASDAQ corporate governance standards. Please see Item 16G of this Annual Report.annual report.

D.  EMPLOYEES

TheUp to completion of the Merger on March 31, 2015, the General Manager iswas responsible for theour management and administration of the Company. Weand we did not have not had any employees since our inception other than Ola Lorentzon, who was appointed as our Chief Executive Officer of Knightsbridge in May 2010, and Inger M. Klemp, who has served as ourKnightsbridge's Chief Financial Officer since September 2007.2007 until completion of the Merger.

Following completion of the Merger on March 31, 2015, we employ approximately 25 people in offices in Oslo and Singapore. We contract with independent ship managers to manage and operate its vessels.

E.  SHARE OWNERSHIP

As of April 8, 2013,24, 2015, the beneficial interests of our Directors and officers in our common shares were as follows:

Director or OfficerCommon Shares of $0.01 each
Percentage of Common Shares Outstanding
Unvested RSUs (1)
Ola Lorentzon7,133
(2)
12,591
Douglas C. Wolcott5,349
(2)
9,443
David M. White5,349
(2)
9,443
Hans Petter Aas5,349
(2)
9,443
Herman Billung


Inger M. Klemp


Georgina Sousa




4351



(1) All vested RSUs have been settled.
(2) Less than 1%.
Director or OfficerCommon Shares of $0.01 each
Percentage of Common Shares Outstanding
Unvested RSUs (1)

Ola Lorentzon31,688
(2)
18,063
Hans Petter Aas23,765
(2)
13,551
Herman Billung (3)
13,749
(2)

Robert D. Somerville607
(2)
6,738
David M. White23,765
(2)
13,551
Gert-Jan van der Akker


Kate Blankenship (4)
28,322
(2)

John Fredriksen (5)



Birgitte Ringstad Vartdal (6)
8,249
(2)

Georgina Sousa



1.All vested RSUs have been settled.

2.Less than 1%.

3.Herman Billung owned 100,000 shares in the Former Golden Ocean and received 13,749 of our shares at the time of the completion of the Merger. In addition, Mr. Billung held 550,000 options in the Former Golden Ocean, which were converted into 75,620 options in us at the time of the completion of the Merger.

4.Kate Blankenship owned 206,000 shares in the Former Golden Ocean and received 28,322 of our shares at the time of the completion of the Merger. In addition, Kate Blankenship held 75,000 options in the Former Golden Ocean, which were converted into 10,312 options in us at the time of the completion of the Merger.

5.Hemen, a company indirectly controlled by trusts established by Mr. John Fredriksen for the benefit of his immediate family, and certain of its affiliates, including Frontline 2012, currently owns 105,852,260 of our shares. In addition, Franklin Enterprises Inc., or Franklin, a company indirectly controlled by trusts established by Mr. John Fredriksen for the benefit of his immediate family, owns $74.8 million of the Convertible Bond in the Former Golden Ocean, which was assumed by us at the time of completion of the Merger and this holding is convertible into 3,753,135 of our shares, or the Bond Shares, at an exercise price of $19.93 per share. In addition, Mr. John Fredriksen held 1,000,000 options in the Former Golden Ocean, which were converted into 137,490 options in us at the time of the completion of the Merger.

6.Birgitte Ringstad Vartdal owned 60,000 shares in the Former Golden Ocean and received 8,249 of our shares at the time of the completion of the Merger. In addition, Birgitte Ringstad Vartdal held 400,000 options in the Former Golden Ocean, which were converted into 54,996 options in us at the time of the completion of the Merger.

ITEM 7.  MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

A.  MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

AsThe following table presents certain information as of April 8, 2013,24, 2015 regarding the Company is not awareownership of anyour common shares with respect to each shareholder whowhom we know to beneficially ownsown more than 5% of our outstanding common shares.

OwnerNumber of shares owned
Percentage owned (1)

Hemen Holding Limited (2)
109,605,395
62%
(1) Percentage amounts based on 176,428,772 common shares outstanding as of April 24, 2015, which includes the Bond Shares.

(2) Hemen is a Cyprus holding company, which is indirectly controlled by trusts established by Mr. Fredriksen, for the benefit of his immediate family. Mr. Fredriksen disclaims beneficial ownership of the common shares held by Hemen, except to the extent of his voting and dispositive interest in such shares of common stock.
The Company Mr. Fredriksen has no pecuniary interest in the shares held by Hemen. Hemen is not directly or indirectly controlledalso the largest shareholder in Frontline 2012 and Franklin and, as such, can be deemed to own the 77,500,000 shares held by another corporation, by a foreign government or by any other natural or legal person. We are not aware of any arrangements,Frontline 2012 and the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company.3,753,135 Bond Shares.


52



B.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
We transact business with the following related parties, being companies in which Hemen and companies associated with Hemen have a significant interest: Frontline Ltd. and its subsidiaries (Frontline Management (Bermuda) Ltd, ICB Shipping (Bermuda) Ltd and Seateam Management Pte Ltd), Karpasia Shipping Inc., and Frontline 2012 Ltd.

In March 2012, the Former Golden Ocean sold its entire holding of shares in Knightsbridge and was no longer considered to be a related party. The Former Golden Ocean was considered a related party from September 2014 when Knightsbridge became a majority-owned subsidiary of Frontline 2012 following the acquisition of thirteen SPCs from Frontline 2012 (see below).

Frontline 2012 Transactions

In July and October 2010, the Company purchased two 2010-builtApril 2014, Knightsbridge acquired five SPCs from Frontline 2012, each owning a fuel efficient 180,000 dwt Capesize dry bulk carriers,newbuilding and a subsidiary of Knightsbridge acquired a 2013-built Capesize dry bulk carrier, Golden Future Bulk Chinaand (renamed Golden ZhejiangKSL China), from Golden Ocean. Golden FutureKarpasia. The consideration was purchased for $47.0settled by the issuance of 15.5 million shares and 3.1 million shares to Frontline 2012 and Hemen (on behalf of Karpasia), respectively, which were recorded at a price of $12.54 per share, $150.0 million was assumed in remaining newbuilding installments in connection with the SPC's acquired from Frontline 2012 and $24.0 million was paid in cash and 1,464,515to Karpasia. Cash of $43.4 million was acquired on the purchase of the five SPC's. No other working capital balances were acquired.

In April 2014, Knightsbridge agreed to acquire 25 SPCs from Frontline 2012, each owning a fuel efficient dry bulk newbuilding. In September 2014, Knightsbridge acquired 13 of these SPCs. The consideration for the 13 SPCs was settled by the issuance of 31.0 million shares. The issuance of the 31.0 million shares with awas recorded at an aggregate value of $25.0 million. $356.8 million based on the closing price of $11.51 per share on September 15, the closing date of the transaction. $490.0 million was assumed in remaining newbuilding installments and cash of $25.1 million was acquired on the purchase of the thirteen SPCs. Knightsbridge acquired the remaining twelve SPCs in March 2015 and issued 31.0 million shares as consideration.

For more information on the Frontline 2012 Transactions, please see “Item 10 - Additional Information - Material Contracts.”

Management Structure

Overall responsibility for the oversight of the management of our company and its subsidiaries will rest with the Board. We plan to operate management services through our subsidiary incorporated in Bermuda, Golden Zhejiang was purchasedOcean Group Management (Bermuda) Ltd., who in turn will subcontract services to Golden Ocean Management AS and Golden Ocean Management Asia Pte Ltd., subsidiaries incorporated in Norway and Singapore, respectively. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer are employed by Golden Ocean Management AS. The Board plans to define the scope and terms of the services to be provided, including day-to-day operations, by the aforementioned subsidiaries, and will require that it be consulted on all matters of material importance and/or of an unusual nature and, for $47.0such matters, will provide specific authorization to personnel to act on our behalf.

General Management Agreement

We receive general administrative services from the General Manager, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Frontline. The General Manager subcontracts the services provided to us and our subsidiaries to Frontline Management (Bermuda) Limited, another wholly owned subsidiary of Frontline. Pursuant to the terms of the Amended General Management Agreement effective April 2, 2010, the General Manager receives a management fee of $2.3 million in cashper annum since January 1, 2010, which is subject to annual adjustments, plus a commission of 1.25% on gross freight revenues from our tanker vessels, 1% of proceeds on the sale of any of our vessels, and 973,684 shares with a value1% of $18.5 million. Both vessels were acquired with an existing time charter and $3.3 millionthe cost of the purchase priceof vessels. In addition, we, in our discretion, award equity incentives to the General Manager based upon its performance. Such awards are subject to the approval of the Board. We are also responsible for paying all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the General Manager from third parties in connection with the services it provides under the Amended General Management Agreement, such as audit, legal and other professional fees, registration fees and directors' and officers' fees and expenses. The Board believes that the terms of the Amended General Management Agreement are substantially similar to those obtained in arm's-length negotiations in the market.

We are able terminate the Amended General Management Agreement subject to five business days' prior written notice to the General Manager in the event:

the General Manager commits a material breach under the Amended General Management Agreement, and such breach remains unremedied for 30 days;

53



any material consent, authorization, license, approval or similar requirement for the Golden Zhejiang has been attributedGeneral Manager's activities as such is modified, terminated, revoked or expires;
it becomes unlawful for the General Manager to perform the services to be provided under the terms of the Amended General Management Agreement; or
the General Manager ceases to be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Frontline.

The General Manager is able to terminate the Amended General Management Agreement upon five business days' notice in the event we commit a material breach of the terms thereof and the breach remains unremedied for 30 days. Either party is able to terminate the Amended General Management Agreement upon immediate written notice to the valueother party in the event such other party becomes subject to an insolvency event. Either party is able to terminate the Amended General Management Agreement upon 12 months' prior written notice to the other party, provided that such termination by us must be approved by a resolution duly adopted by the affirmative vote of shareholders holding at least 66 2/3% of our issued and outstanding common shares. The Board believed that if the Amended General Management Agreement was terminated, we would be able to obtain appropriate alternative arrangements for our management requirements.

Technical Management

The technical management of our vessels is provided by ship mangers subcontracted by the General Manager.

Commercial Management

Pursuant to the Dry Bulk Commercial Management Agreement, the Dry Bulk Manager manages our dry bulk carriers. The Dry Bulk Manager subcontracts some or all of the time charter.

services provided to us and our subsidiaries to its affiliates or third parties. Pursuant to the Dry Bulk Commercial Management fees, which representAgreement, the Dry bulk Manager receives a commission of 1.25% of all gross freight earned by theour dry bulk carriers,carriers. In addition, we, in our discretion, award equity incentives to the Dry Bulk Manager based on its performance. Such awards are subject to the approval of $0.5 million were invoicedthe Board.

A summary of net amounts charged by Golden Oceanrelated parties in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and paid2012 is as follows:

(in thousands of $) 2014
 2013
 2012
ICB Shipping (Bermuda) Ltd 2,315
 2,315
 2,315
Frontline Management (Bermuda) Ltd 2,962
 154
 
The Former Golden Ocean 1,034
 408
 533
Seateam Management Pte Ltd
 562
 228
 208

Net amounts charged by related parties comprise of general management and commercial management fees, newbuilding supervision fees and newbuilding commission fees.

While comparatives have been given for the Company during each of 2011and 2010. Asyears ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 in the table above and as of December 31, 2011, $0.3 million was payable2013 in the tables below, it should be noted that these companies were not considered to Golden Ocean. Atbe related parties in 2013 and 2012.

A summary of balances due from related parties for the years ended December 31, 2010, $69,000 was2014 and 2013 is as follows:

(in thousands of $)   2014
 2013
Frontline 2012 Ltd   38
 
Seateam Management Pte Ltd   411
 108
Frontline Management (Bermuda) Ltd
   
 9
Frontline Ltd
   
 11
    449
 128

A summary of balances due from Golden Ocean. Onto related parties for the years ended December 22, 201131, 2014 and December 29, 2010, 23,2982013 is as follows:


54



(in thousands of $)   2014
 2013
The Former Golden Ocean   356
 158
Frontline Management (Bermuda) Ltd   1,558
 
ICB Shipping (Bermuda) Ltd   579
 
Frontline Ltd   62
 
    2,555
 158

Receivables and 14,786 RSUs, respectively, were issued to Golden Ocean Management (Bermuda) Limited,payables with related parties comprise unpaid commercial management fees and newbuilding supervision fees. In addition certain payables and receivables arise when Knightsbridge pays an invoice on behalf of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Golden Ocean.related party and vice versa.

We periodically issue RSUs to our directors and management companies.  Please see Item 6B. "Directors,"Item 6B-Directors, Senior Management and Employees – Compensation."
 
C.  INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

A.  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

See Item 18.

Legal Proceedings

The CompanyKnightsbridge has claims for unpaid charter hire owed by (i) Hong Xiang with respect to its time charter of the the Golden Zhejiang, (ii) Sanko with respect to its time charter of the Battersea, and (iii) Titan Petrochemicals Limited with respect to its bare boatbareboat charters of the VLCCs Titan Venus and Mayfair. The CompanyKnightsbridge is also seeking recovery of damages for the remaining periods of these charter contracts. The aggregate amount of these claims is approximately $76$2.4 million. The CompanyKnightsbridge is unable to predict the outcome of these casesthis case at this time.

In 2014, Knightsbridge received $17.5 million in respect of a claim for unpaid charter hire and damages for early termination of the time charter for the Golden Zhejiang and recorded this amount as other operating income. Knightsbridge also received $1.9 million in this respect and this amount was recorded as time charter revenue as it related to unrecognized time charter revenue in respect of services previously rendered. These amounts were received as full and final settlement in connection with a claim that was lodged jointly with another claimant's claim against the same defendant.

In February 2014 and April 2014, Knightsbridge received $0.2 million and $0.1 million as final settlements for unpaid charter hire for Battersea and recorded these amounts as other operating income.

During 2012 and 2013, the Former Golden Ocean cancelled nine newbuilding contracts at Jinhaiwan and all of the cancellations were taken to arbitration by the shipyard. The Former Golden Ocean received positive awards on all contracts during 2014 and received $103.6 million during 2014 in respect of installments paid and accrued interest on three contracts. There were appeals to the High Court in London on the remaining contracts and the Former Golden Ocean was awarded full repayment on all remaining contracts at the end of 2014. The Former Golden Ocean received $72 million in the first quarter of 2015, in respect of installments paid and accrued interest on four of the six appealed contracts and used $9.6 million of this amount to repay debt. In April 2015, the Former Golden Ocean received a final refund of $40.1 million on the two remaining appealed contracts. There was no debt associated with these last two contracts.

Except as described above, to the best of our knowledge, there are no legal or arbitration proceedings existing or pending which have had or may have significant effects on our financial position or profitability and no such proceedings are pending or known to be contemplated.

Cash Distribution Policy
 
Our cash distribution policy is to declare quarterly cash distributions to shareholders, substantially equal to net cash flow in the reporting quarter less reserves that our Board may from time to time determine are necessary, such as reserves for drydocking and other possible cash needs. We intend to finance our future vessel acquisitions not from our cash flow from operations, but from

4455



external sources, such as by undertaking equity offerings, incurring additional indebtedness in line with our current low-leverage capital structure and utilizing the proceeds from the sale of our vessels.
 
There is no guarantee that our shareholders will receive quarterly cash distributions from us. Our cash distribution policy may be changed at any time at the sole discretion of our Board, who will take into account, among other things, our contingent liabilities,newbuilding commitments, financial condition and future prospects, the terms of our credit facilities, and the requirements of Bermuda law in determining the timing and amount of cash distributions, if any, that we may pay.

In 2014, 2013 and 2012, 2011 and 2010, the CompanyKnightsbridge paid the following cash distributions to shareholders.

Record DatePayment Date Amount per share
2014
February 19, 2014March 6, 2014
$0.175
May 22, 2014June 5, 2014
$0.20
August 28, 2014September 10, 2014
$0.20
December 3, 2014December 10, 2014
$0.05
2013
February 20, 2013March 6, 2013
$0.175
May 22, 2013June 5, 2013
$0.175
August 28, 2013September 10, 2013
$0.175
November 29, 2013December 10, 2013
$0.175
2012  
February 23, 2012March 8, 2012
$0.50
May 23, 2012June 6, 2012
$0.35
August 30, 2012September 12, 2012
$0.175
November 28, 2012December 12, 2012
$0.175
2011
February 17, 2011March 3, 2011
$0.50
May 25, 2011June 9, 2011
$0.50
August 31, 2011September 14, 2011
$0.50
November 18, 2011December 2, 2011
$0.50
2010
February 19, 2010March 4, 2010
$0.30
May 21, 2010June 7, 2010
$0.40
August 24, 2010September 7, 2010
$0.50
November 19, 2010December 6, 2010
$0.50

On February 5, 2013, theThe Knightsbridge Board declareddecided not to declare a cash distribution of $0.175 per sharedividend for the fourth quarter of 2012 that was paid on March 6 2013.2014 due to the current market environment.

B.  SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
 
None.
 
ITEM 9.  THE OFFER AND LISTING

The following table sets forth, for the five most recent fiscal years during which the Company's Common SharesKnightsbridge's common shares were traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, the annual high and low prices for the Common Sharescommon shares as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

Fiscal year ended December 31,High
 Low
High
 Low
2014
$16.32
 
$3.57
2013
$10.69
 
$5.31
2012
$15.81
 
$4.94

$15.81
 
$4.94
2011
$25.80
 
$13.50

$25.80
 
$13.50
2010
$24.49
 
$13.36

$24.49
 
$13.36
2009
$17.16
 
$11.00
2008
$35.00
 
$10.01

The following table sets forth, for the two most recent fiscal years, the high and low prices for the Common Sharescommon shares as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market.


4556




Fiscal year ended December 31, 2012High
 Low
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2014High
 Low
First quarter
$15.81
 
$13.48

$14.85
 
$8.51
Second quarter
$14.40
 
$7.77

$16.32
 
$11.13
Third quarter
$8.94
 
$5.91

$14.70
 
$8.66
Fourth quarter
$6.73
 
$4.94

$9.24
 
$3.57
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2011High
 Low
   
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2013High
 Low
First quarter
$25.80
 
$22.41

$8.33
 
$5.31
Second quarter
$25.24
 
$18.76

$8.30
 
$6.10
Third quarter
$22.70
 
$16.00

$10.69
 
$6.75
Fourth quarter
$18.10
 
$13.50

$10.42
 
$7.21

The following table sets forth, for the most recent six months, the high and low prices for the Common Sharescommon shares as reported by the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
MonthHigh
 Low
April 2013 (through April 8)
$8.25
 
$7.15
March 2013
$8.33
 
$6.55
February 2013
$7.17
 
$6.21
January 2013
$7.40
 
$5.31
December 2012
$6.25
 
$5.12
November 2012
$6.40
 
$4.94
October 2012
$6.73
 
$6.16
MonthHigh
 Low
April 2015 (through April 20)
$5.90
 
$4.36
March 2015
$5.29
 
$3.98
February 2015
$5.15
 
$4.02
January 2015
$5.69
 
$3.88
December 2014
$5.70
 
$3.57
November 2014
$8.74
 
$5.56
October 2014
$9.24
 
$5.79

The Company'sKnightsbridge's shares of common stock have been quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "VLCCF" since its initial public offering in February 1997. Trading in the shares of Golden Ocean commenced on the Oslo Stock Exchange on April 1, 2015 under the ticker code "VLCCF". Commencing on April 7, 2015, Golden Ocean shares traded on the Oslo Stock Exchange under the ticker code "GOGL". Golden Ocean began trading under its new name and ticker symbol "GOGL" on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on April 1, 2015.
 
ITEM 10.  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A.  SHARE CAPITAL

Not applicable.

B.  MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

IncorporatedUnder our amended Memorandum of Association, our authorized share capital consists of 200,000,000 shares, $0.01 per share, of which 172,675,637 shares were issued and outstanding as of the date of this annual report.

Our Amended and Restated Bye-Laws were adopted at the Special General Meeting held on March 26, 2015.

To see the full text of our Memorandum of Association and Amended and Restated Bye-Laws, please see Exhibits 1.1 and 1.4 attached to this annual report.

Purpose

The purposes and powers of Golden Ocean are set forth in Items 6 and 7(a) through (h) of our amended Memorandum of Association and by reference to "Descriptionthe Second Schedule of the Companies Act. These purposes include exploring, drilling, moving, transporting and refining petroleum and hydro-carbon products, including oil and oil products; acquiring, owning, chartering, selling, managing and operating ships and aircraft; the entering into of any guarantee, contract, indemnity or suretyship to assure, support, secure, with or without the consideration or benefit, the performance of any obligations of any person or persons; and the borrowing and raising of money in any currency or currencies to secure or discharge any debt or obligation in any manner.

57




There are no limitations on the right of non-Bermudians or non-residents of Bermuda to hold or vote our common shares.

Voting Rights

The holders of our common shares will be entitled to one vote per share on each matter requiring the approval of the holders of the common shares. At any annual or special general meeting of shareholders where there is a quorum, a simple majority vote will generally decide any matter, unless a different vote is required by express provision of the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws or Bermuda law.

The Companies Act and our Amended and Restated Bye-Laws do not confer any conversion or sinking fund rights attached to our common shares.

Preemptive Rights

Bermuda law does not provide a shareholder with a preemptive right to subscribe for additional issues of a company’s shares unless, and to the extent that, the right is expressly granted to the shareholder under the bye-laws of a company or under any contract between the shareholder and the company.

Holders of our common shares do not have any preemptive rights pursuant to the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws.

Repurchase of Shares

Subject to the Companies Act, the Memorandum of Association and the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws, our Board may from time to time repurchase any common shares for cancellation or to be held as treasury shares.

Holders of our common shares, however, do not have any right to require Golden Ocean to purchase their shares pursuant to the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws.

Redemption of Preference Shares

Golden Ocean may with the approval of the shareholders issue preference shares which are redeemable at the option of Golden Ocean or the holder, subject to the Companies Act, the Memorandum of Association and the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws.

Call on Shares

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws, the Board may from time to time make calls upon our shareholders in respect of any moneys unpaid on their shares.

Reduction of Share Capital Stock"

Subject to the Companies Act, the Memorandum of Association and the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws, the shareholders may by resolution authorize the reduction of Golden Ocean’s issued share capital or any capital redemption reserve fund or any share premium account in any manner.

Dividend and Other Distributions

Under the Companies Act, a company may, subject to its bye-laws and by resolution of the directors, declare and pay a dividend, or make a distribution out of contributed surplus, provided there are reasonable grounds for believing that after any such payment (a) the company will be solvent and (b) the realizable value of its assets will be greater than its liabilities.

The Amended and Restated Bye-Laws provide that the Board from time to time may declare cash dividends or distributions out of contributed surplus to be paid to the shareholders according to their rights and interests including such interim dividends as appear to be justified by the position of Golden Ocean.

Board of Directors

The Amended and Restated Bye-Laws provide that the Board shall consist of not less than two members and shall at all times comprise a majority of directors who are not residents in the United Kingdom or Norway. Our shareholders may change the number

58



of directors by the vote of shareholders representing a simple majority of the total number of votes which may be cast at any annual or special general meeting, or by written resolution. Each director is elected at an annual general meeting of shareholders for a term commencing upon election and each director shall serve until re-elected or their successors are appointed on the date of the next scheduled annual general meeting of shareholders. The Amended and Restated Bye-Laws do not permit cumulative voting for directors.

Subject to the Companies Act, the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws permit our directors to engage in any transaction or arrangement with us or in which we may otherwise be interested. Additionally, as long as our director declares the nature of his or her interest at the first opportunity at a meeting of the Board, he or she shall not by reason of his office be accountable to us for any benefit which he or she derives from any transaction to which the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws permit him or her to be interested.

Our directors are not required to retire because of their age and are not required to be holders of our common shares.

Removal of Directors and Vacancies on the Board

Under the Companies Act, any director may be removed, with or without cause, by a vote of the majority of shareholders if the bye-laws so provide. A company may remove a director by specifically convening a special general meeting of the shareholders. The notice of any such special general meeting must be served on the director concerned no less than fourteen (14) days before the special general meeting. The affected director is entitled to be heard at that special general meeting.

The Amended and Restated Bye-Laws provide that directors may be removed, with or without cause, by a vote of the shareholders representing a majority of the votes present and entitled to vote at a special general meeting called for that purpose. The notice of any such special general meeting must be served on the director concerned no less than 14 days before the special general meeting and he or she shall be entitled to be heard at that special general meeting.

Any director vacancy created by the removal of a director from our board shall be filled by a majority vote of the shareholders entitled to vote at the special general meeting called for the purpose of removal of that director, and any vacancy in the number of directors voted by such removal may be filled at such meeting by the election of another director in the removed director’s place, or in the absence of such election, by the Board. The Board may fill casual vacancies so long as quorum of directors remains in office. Each director elected to the board to fill a vacancy shall serve until the next annual general meeting of shareholders and until a successor is duly elected and qualified or until such director’s resignation or removal.

Quorum and Action by the Board of Directors

The Amended and Restated Bye-Laws provide that at any meeting of the Board (which must be held outside of the United Kingdom or Norway), the presence of the majority of the Board, unless otherwise fixed, constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business and that when a quorum is present, the acts of a majority of the directors present at any meeting shall be the acts of the Board, except as may be otherwise specified by Bermuda law or the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws. A quorum shall not be present unless a majority of directors present are neither resident in Norway nor physically located or resident in the United Kingdom.

A resolution in writing signed by all directors for the time being entitled to receive notice of a meeting of the Board shall be as valid and effectual as a resolution passed at a meeting of the Board.

A meeting of the board or committee appointed by the board shall be deemed to take place at the place where the largest group of participating directors or committee members has assembled or, if no such group exists, at the place where the chairman of the meeting participates. In no event shall the place where the largest group of participating directors or committee members has assembled or, if no such group exists, the place where the chairman of the meeting participates, be located in the United Kingdom. The Board or relevant committee shall use its best endeavors to ensure that any such meeting is not deemed to have been held in Norway, and the fact that one or more directors may be present at such teleconference by virtue of his being physically in Norway shall not deem such meeting to have taken place in Norway.

Duties of Directors and Officers; Limitation of Liability

Under Bermuda law, directors and officers shall discharge their duties in good faith and with that degree of diligence, care and skill which reasonably prudent people would exercise under similar circumstances in like positions. In discharging their duties, directors and officers may rely upon financial statements of the corporation represented to them to be correct by the president or the officer having charge of its books or accounts or by independent accountants.


59



The Companies Act provides that a company’s bye-laws may include a provision for the elimination or limitation of liability of a director to the corporation or its shareholders for any loss arising or liability attaching to him by virtue of any rule of law in respect to any negligence, default, breach of any duty or breach of trust of which the director may be guilty of; provided that such provision shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a director for any fraud or dishonesty he may be guilty of.

The Amended and Restated Bye-Laws limit the liability of our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the Companies Act.

Director Indemnification

Bermuda law permits the bye-laws of a Bermuda company to contain a provision indemnifying the company’s directors and officers for any loss arising or liability attaching to him or her by virtue of any rule of law in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust of which the officer or person may be guilty, save with respect to fraud or dishonesty. Bermuda law also grants companies the power generally to indemnify directors and officers of a company, except in instances of fraud and dishonesty, if any such person was or is a party or threatened to be made a party to a threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director and officer of such company or was serving in a similar capacity for another entity at such company’s request.

The Amended and Restated Bye-Laws provide that each director, alternate director, officer, person or member of a board committee, if any, resident representative, and his or her heirs, executors or administrators, collectively, Indemnitees, will be indemnified and held harmless out of our assets to the fullest extent permitted by Bermuda law against all liabilities, loss, damage or expense (including but not limited to liabilities under contract, tort and statute or any applicable foreign law or regulation and all reasonable legal and other costs and expenses properly payable) incurred or suffered by him or her as such director, alternate director, officer, person or committee member or resident representative. The restrictions on liability, indemnities and waivers provided for in the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws do not extend to any matter that would render the same void under the Companies Act. In addition, each Indemnitee shall be indemnified out of our assets against all liabilities incurred in defending any proceedings, whether civil or criminal, in which judgment is given in such Indemnitee’s favor, or in which he or she is acquitted.

Under the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws, shareholders have further agreed to waive any claim or right of action they may have at any time against any Indemnitee on account of any action taken by such Indemnitee or the failure of such Indemnitee to take any action in the performance of his or her duties with or for Golden Ocean with the exception of any claims or rights of action arising out of fraud or dishonesty

Shareholder Meetings

Under the Companies Act, an annual general meeting of the shareholders shall be held for the election of directors on any date or time as designated by or in the manner provided for in the bye-laws and held at such place within or outside Bermuda as may be designated in the bye-laws. Any other proper business may be transacted at the annual general meeting.

Under the Companies Act, any meeting that is not the annual general meeting is called a special general meeting, and may be called by the Board or by such persons as authorized by the corporation’s memorandum of association or bye-laws. Under the Companies Act, holders of one-tenth of a company’s issued common shares may also call special general meetings. At such special general meeting, only business that is related to the purpose set forth in the required notice may be transacted. Additionally, under Bermuda law, a company may, by resolution at a special general meeting, elect to dispense with the holding of an annual general meeting for (a) the year in which it is made and any subsequent year or years; (b) for a specified number of years; or (c) indefinitely.
Under the Companies Act, notice of any general meeting must be given not less than five (5) days before the meeting and shall state the place, date and hour of the meeting and, in the case of a special general meeting, shall also state the purpose of such meeting and the that it is being called at the direction of whoever is calling the meeting. Under Bermuda law, accidental failure to give notice will not invalidate proceedings at a general meeting.

Annual General Meetings. The Amended and Restated Bye-Laws provide that the Board may fix the date, time and place of the annual general meeting within or without Bermuda (but never in the United Kingdom or Norway) for the election of directors and to transact any other business properly brought before the meeting.

Special General Meetings. The Amended and Restated Bye-Laws provide that special general meetings may be called by the Board and when required by the Companies Act (i.e., by holders of one-tenth of a company’s issued common shares through a written request to the board).


60



Notice Requirements. The Amended and Restated Bye-Laws provide that we must give not less than five (5) days notice before any annual or special general meeting.

Quorum of Shareholders

Under the Companies Act, where the bye-laws so provide, a general meeting of the shareholders of a company may be held with only one individual present if the requirement for a quorum is satisfied and, where a company has only one shareholder or only one holder of any class of shares, the shareholder present in person or by proxy constitutes a general meeting.

Under the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws, quorum at annual or special general meetings shall be constituted by two or more shareholders either present in person or represented by proxy. If we only have one shareholder, then one shareholder present in person or proxy shall constitute the necessary quorum.

Shareholder Action without a Meeting

Under the Companies Act, unless the company’s bye-laws provide otherwise, any action required to or that may be taken at an annual or general meeting can be taken without a meeting if a written consent to such action is signed by the necessary majority of the shareholders entitled to vote with respect thereto.

The Amended and Restated Bye-Laws provide that, except in the case of the removal of auditors and directors, anything which may be done by resolution may, without an annual or special general meeting and without any previous notice being required, be done by resolution in writing, signed by a simple majority of all the shareholders or their proxies (or such greater majority required by the Companies Act).

Shareholder’s Rights to Examine Books and Records

Under the Companies Act, any shareholder, during the usual hours of business, may inspect, for a purpose reasonably related to his or her interest as a shareholder, and make copies of extracts from the share register, and minutes of all general meetings.

Amendments to Memorandum of Association

Under Bermuda law, a company may, by resolution passed at an annual or special general meeting of shareholders, alter the provisions of the memorandum of association. An application for alteration can only be made by (i) holders of not less in the aggregate than 20% in par value of a company’s issued share capital, (ii) by holders of not less in the aggregate that 20% of the company’s debentures entitled to object to alterations to the memorandum, or (iii) in the case a company that is limited by guarantee, by not less than 20% of the shareholders.

Variation in Shareholder Rights

Under Bermuda law, if at any time a company has more than one class of shares, the rights attaching to any class, unless otherwise provided for by the terms of issue of the relevant class, the rights attached to any class of share may be varied with (i) the consent in writing of the holders of 75% in nominal value of the issued shares of that class, or (ii) the sanction of a resolution passed at a separate general meeting of holders of the shares of the class at which a quorum consisting of at least two persons holding or representing of one-third of the issued shares of the relevant class is present.

The Amended and Restated Bye-Laws may be amended from time to time in the manner provided for in the Companies Act.

Vote on Amalgamations, Mergers, Consolidations and Sales of Assets

Under the Companies Act, any plan of merger or amalgamation must be authorized by the resolution of a company’s shareholders and must be approved by a majority vote of three-fourths of those shareholders voting at such special general meeting. Also, it is required that a quorum of two or more persons holding or representing more than one-third (1/3) of the issued and outstanding common shares of the company on the Record Date are in attendance in person or by proxy at such special general meeting.

There are no provisions in our Amended and Restated Bye-Laws addressing such matters.

Appraisal and Dissenters Rights


61



Under Bermuda law, in the event of an amalgamation or a merger of a Bermuda company with another company or corporation, a shareholder of the Bermuda company who did not vote in favor of the amalgamation or merger and is not satisfied that fair value has been offered for such shareholder’s shares may, within one month of notice of the special general meeting, apply to the Supreme Court of Bermuda to appraise the fair value of those shares.

Derivative Actions

Class actions and derivative actions are generally not available to shareholders under Bermuda law. Bermuda courts, however, would ordinarily be expected to permit a shareholder to commence an action in the name of a company to remedy a wrong to the company where the act complained of is alleged to be beyond the corporate power of the company, or illegal, or would result in the violation of the company’s memorandum of association or bye-laws. Furthermore, consideration would be given by a Bermuda court to acts that are alleged to constitute a fraud against the minority shareholders or, for instance, where an act requires the approval of a greater percentage of the company’s shareholders than that which actually approved it. However, generally a derivative action will not be permitted where there is an alternative action available that would provide an adequate remedy. Any property or damages recovered by derivative action go to the company, not to the plaintiff shareholders. When the affairs of a company are being conducted in a manner which is oppressive or prejudicial to the interests of some part of the shareholders, one or more shareholders may apply to the Supreme Court of Bermuda, which may make such order as it sees fit, including an order regulating the conduct of the company’s affairs in the future or ordering the purchase of the shares of any shareholders by other shareholders or by the company or that the company be wound up.

A statutory right of action is conferred on subscribers to shares of a Bermuda company against persons (including directors and officers) responsible for the issue of a prospectus in respect of damage suffered by reason of an untrue statement contained in the prospectus, but this confers no right of action against the Bermuda company itself. In addition, subject to any limitations that may be contained in the Company's Registration Statementcompany’s bye-laws, a shareholder may bring a derivative action on Form F-3, as amendedbehalf of the company to enforce a right of the company (as opposed to a right of its shareholders) against its officers (including directors) for breach of their statutory and supplemented, which was initially filed on June 24, 2011 (File No. 333-175125).fiduciary duty to act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the company.

AtThe Amended and Restated Bye-Laws contain provisions whereby each shareholder (i) agrees that the 2005 Annual General Meetingliability of our officers shall be limited, (ii) agrees to waive any claim or right of action such shareholder might have, whether individually or in the Companyright of Golden Ocean, against any director, alternate director, officer, person or member of a committee, resident representative or any of their respective heirs, executors or administrators for any action taken by any such person, or the shareholders votedfailure of any such person to amendtake any action, in the Company's bye-laws 83performance of his or her duties, or supposed duties, to Golden Ocean or otherwise, and 85(iii) agrees to allow us to indemnify and hold harmless our officers and directors in respect of any liability attaching to such officer and director incurred by removing the restrictions that limited the Company's business activities.him or her as an officer or director of Golden Ocean. The changes to the bye-laws removed restrictions on liability, indemnity and waiver do not extend to any liability of an officer or director for fraud or dishonesty.

Anti-takeover Provisions

Our memorandum of association and the Company's activities such as recharteringAmended and Restated Bye-Laws contain provisions that may have anti-takeover effects, including (1) the VLCCs, refinancing or replacing the credit facility, acting in connectionauthorization of up to 200,000,000 common shares with the management agreement, offering Common Shares and listing them, enforcing its rights in connection with the Charters, the Credit Facility, the UK Finance Leases, the management agreementpotential voting powers, designations, preferences and other agreements into whichrights as may be provided for by the CompanyBoard and its subsidiaries entered(2) no provision allowing for cumulative voting in the election of directors. Additionally, as required by the Companies Act, at the timeleast ten (10) percent of its initial public offering, and leasing, selling or otherwise disposing of a VLCC (or VLCC owning subsidiaries) on termination of the Charters or subsequent charters. The amended bye-laws of the Company as adopted on June 27, 2005, have been filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on June 15, 2006, and are hereby incorporated by reference into this Annual Report.

On September 23, 2011, at the Company's 2011 Annual General Meeting, the shareholders approved an increase of the Company's authorized common shares, par value $0.01, from 35,000,000 to 50,000,000. The Company currently has issued and outstanding 24,472,061shares entitled to vote are allowed to call for a special general meeting to effectuate change at the company, which may prevent a shareholder from forcing a special general meeting of shareholders and impede a change of control of the company or the removal of management.

Liquidation

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws, in the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of common shares are entitled to share in our assets, if any, remaining after the payment of all of our debts and liabilities, subject to any liquidation preference on any outstanding preference shares.

C.  MATERIAL CONTRACTS

Acquisition Agreement

On April 3, 2014, Knightsbridge entered into an agreement pursuant to which Knightsbridge purchased from Frontline 2012 all of the shares of five single purpose companies, each having a newbuilding Capesize bulk carrier on order for expected delivery in 2014. As consideration for the purchase, Knightsbridge issued 15.5 million common shares, or the First Acquisition Agreement Shares, to Frontline 2012.

4662



Memorandum of Agreement and Subscription and Settlement Agreement

None.On April 3, 2014, a subsidiary of Knightsbridge, or the Knightsbridge Subsidiary, and Karpasia, entered into an agreement, or the Memorandum of Agreement, whereby the Knightsbridge Subsidiary acquired a Capesize dry bulk carrier built in 2013 from Karpasia. $24.0 million was paid in cash on delivery of the bulk carrier. To assist the Knightsbridge Subsidiary in financing the remaining $31.0 million owed pursuant to the transaction, or the Seller's Credit, Knightsbridge and the Knightsbridge Subsidiary entered into an agreement with Hemen and Karpasia on April 3, 2014, or the Subscription and Settlement Agreement, pursuant to which Karpasia transferred and assigned the Seller's Credit to Hemen and on April 23, 2014, Hemen received 3.1 million Knightsbridge common shares, or the Hemen Shares, which were recorded by Knightsbridge at a price of $12.54 per share, in full satisfaction of the Seller's Credit.

Registration Rights Agreement

On April 23, 2014, Knightsbridge, Frontline 2012 and Hemen entered into an agreement, or the Registration Rights Agreement, whereby Knightsbridge agreed that it will, within a specified period in the future, prepare and file a shelf registration statement pursuant to Rule 415 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to ensure that the First Acquisition Agreement Shares and the Hemen Shares will be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the Commission. On July 16, 2014, the Commission declared effective Knightsbridge's shelf registration statement on Form F-3, which registered the First Acquisition Agreement Shares and the Hemen Shares.

Second Acquisition Agreement

On September 15, 2014, Knightsbridge and Frontline 2012 entered into an second acquisition agreement, or the Second Acquisition Agreement, pursuant to which Knightsbridge agreed to purchase from Frontline 2012 all of the shares of 25 single purpose companies. The companies agreed that 13 single purpose companies would be purchased on September 15, 2014 for 31.0 million common shares of Knightsbridge and 12 single purpose companies would be purchased on March 16, 2015 for an additional 31.0 million common shares of Knightsbridge. Each special purpose company has a newbuilding Capesize dry bulk carrier on order with expected deliveries between September 2014 and September 2016, with five vessels delivering in 2014, fourteen vessels in 2015 and six vessels in 2016. The closing was ultimately executed in two stages, with 31.0 million common shares issued on September 15, 2014 and an additional 31.0 million common shares issued on March 16, 2015, or together the Second Acquisition Agreement Shares. Pursuant to the Second Acquisition Agreement, among other things, Frontline 2012 agreed that, without the prior written consent of the Knightsbridge Board, neither Frontline 2012 nor any of its affiliates shall for a period of one year from the date of the Second Acquisition Agreement: (a) pursue a transaction involving or that results in the acquisition of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of, a merger with, a recapitalization of, or the acquisition of all or substantially all the assets of, Knightsbridge or a similar or related transaction with Knightsbridge or any of its subsidiaries; (b) act, alone or in concert with others, to seek control or influence the management, board of directors, shareholders, or policies of Knightsbridge; (c) make any public announcement with respect to, or submit a proposal for, or offer of any extraordinary transaction involving Knightsbridge or any of its securities or assets; (d) form, join or in any way participate in a "group" as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in connection with any of the foregoing; or (e) advise, assist or encourage any other person in connection with the foregoing.

Addendum to the Second Acquisition Agreement

On March 13, 2015, Knightsbridge and Frontline 2012 agreed to add an addendum to the Second Acquisition Agreement, or the Addendum. Pursuant to the Addendum, Frontline 2012 agreed to pay us a cash amount equivalent to the equity capital it agreed to provide to the 12 special purposes companies acquired on March 16, 2015.

Second and Third Registration Rights Agreements

On September 15, 2014 and March 16, 2015, Knightsbridge and Frontline 2012 entered into registration rights agreements, or the Second and Third Registration Rights Agreements, whereby Knightsbridge agreed that it will, within a specified period in the future, prepare and file a shelf registration statement pursuant to Rule 415 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to ensure that the Second Acquisition Agreement Shares will be registered with the Commission. On March 26, 2015, Knightsbridge filed a shelf registration statement pursuant to the terms of the Second and Third Registration Rights Agreements. This shelf registration statement has not yet been declared effective by the Commission.

Merger Agreement


63



On October 7, 2014, Knightsbridge and the Former Golden Ocean, a dry bulk shipping company based in Bermuda and listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange, mainly operating in the Capesize and Panamax market segments, entered into an agreement and plan of merger, the Merger, pursuant to which the two companies agreed to merge, with Knightsbridge as the surviving legal entity. The Merger was approved by the shareholders of the Former Golden Ocean and Knightsbridge in separate special general meetings, which were held on March 26, 2015. At the special general meeting of the shareholders of Knightsbridge, the Amended and Restated Bye-laws of Knightsbridge were adopted and it was also agreed that the name of Knightsbridge be changed to Golden Ocean Group Limited immediately after the effective time of the Merger.

The Merger was completed on March 31, 2015, at which time Knightsbridge acquired 100% of the Former Golden Ocean's outstanding shares and the name of Knightsbridge was changed to Golden Ocean Group Limited. Shareholders in the Former Golden Ocean received shares in Knightsbridge as merger consideration. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, one share in the Former Golden Ocean gave the right to receive 0.13749 shares in Knightsbridge, and Knightsbridge issued a total of 61.5 million shares to shareholders in the Former Golden Ocean as merger consideration. Prior to completion of the Merger, Knightsbridge had 111,231,678 common shares outstanding.

Following completion of the Merger, and pursuant to the merger agreement, the cancellation of 51,498 common shares (which were held by the Former Golden Ocean) and the cancellation of 4,543 common shares (which account for fractional shares that we will not be distributed to the Former Golden Ocean shareholders as merger consideration), we have 172,765,637 common shares outstanding. Trading in our shares commenced on the Oslo Stock Exchange on April 1, 2015 under the ticker code "VLCCF". Commencing on April 7, 2015, our shares traded on the Oslo Stock Exchange under the ticker code "GOGL". Our common shares began trading under our new name and ticker symbol "GOGL" on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on April 1, 2015.

D.  EXCHANGE CONTROLS

The Bermuda Monetary Authority, or the BMA, must give permission for all issuances and transfers of securities of a Bermuda exempted company like ours. We have received general permission from the BMA to issue any unissued common shares and for the free transferability of our common shares as long as our common shares are listed on an "appointed stock exchange". Our common shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, which is an "appointed stock exchange". Our common shares may therefore be freely transferred among persons who are residents and non-residents of Bermuda.

Although we are incorporated in Bermuda, we are classified as a non-resident of Bermuda for exchange control purposes by the BMA. Other than transferring Bermuda Dollars out of Bermuda, there are no restrictions on our ability to transfer funds into and out of Bermuda or to pay dividends to U.S. residents who are holders of common shares or other nonresidentsnon-residents of Bermuda who are holders of our common shares in currency other than Bermuda Dollars.

In accordance with Bermuda law, share certificates may be issued only in the names of corporations, individuals or legal persons. In the case of an applicant acting in a special capacity (for example, as an executor or trustee), certificates may, at the request of the applicant, record the capacity in which the applicant is acting. Notwithstanding the recording of any such special capacity, we are not bound to investigate or incur any responsibility in respect of the proper administration of any such estate or trust.

We will take no notice of any trust applicable to any of our shares or other securities whether or not we had notice of such trust.

As an "exempted company", we are exempt from Bermuda laws which restrict the percentage of share capital that may be held by non-Bermudians, but as an exempted company, we may not participate in certain business transactions including: (i) the acquisition or holding of land in Bermuda (except that required for its business and held by way of lease or tenancy for terms of not more than 21 years) without the express authorization of the Bermuda legislature; (ii) the taking of mortgages on land in Bermuda to secure an amount in excess of $50,000 without the consent of the Minister of Business Development and Tourism of Bermuda; (iii) the acquisition of any bonds or debentures secured on any land in Bermuda except bonds or debentures issued by the Government of Bermuda or by a public authority in Bermuda; or (iv) the carrying on of business of any kind in Bermuda, except in so far as may be necessary for the carrying on of its business outside Bermuda or under a license granted by the Minister of Business Development and Tourism of Bermuda.

The Bermuda government actively encourages foreign investment in "exempted" entities like us that are based in Bermuda but do not operate in competition with local business. In addition to having no restrictions on the degree of foreign ownership, we are subject neither to taxes on our income or dividends nor to any exchange controls in Bermuda. In addition, there is no capital gains tax in Bermuda, and profits can be accumulated by us, as required, without limitation. There is no income tax treaty between the United States and Bermuda pertaining to the taxation of income other than applicable to insurance enterprises.

 E.  TAXATION

64



 
The following discussion summarizes the material United States federal income tax and Bermuda tax consequences to United States Holders, and Non-United States Holders, in each case as defined below, of the purchase, ownership and disposition of common shares. This summary does not purport to deal with all aspects of United States federal income taxation and Bermuda taxation and that may be relevant to an investor's decision to purchase common shares, nor any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, locality or other foreign jurisdiction.
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations
In the opinion of Seward & Kissel LLP, our United States counsel, the following are the material United States federal income tax consequences to us of our activities and to United States Holders of our common shares. The following discussion of U.S. federal income tax matters is based on the Code, judicial decisions, administrative pronouncements, and existing and proposed regulations issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. Except as otherwise noted, this discussion is based on the assumption that we will not maintain an office or other fixed place of business within the United States.
Taxation of Golden Ocean's Shipping Income: In General
We anticipate that we will derive substantially all of our gross income from the use and operation of vessels in international commerce and that this income will principally consist of freights from the transportation of cargoes, charterhire from time or voyage charters and the performance of services directly related thereto, which we refer to as "shipping income".
Shipping income that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the United States will be considered to be 50% derived from sources within the United States. Shipping income attributable to transportation that both begins and ends in the United States will be considered to be 100% derived from sources within the United States. We are not permitted by law to engage in transportation that gives rise to 100% United States source income.
Shipping income attributable to transportation exclusively between non-United States ports will be considered to be 100% derived from sources outside the United States. Shipping income derived from sources outside the United States will not be subject to United States federal income tax.
Based upon our current and anticipated shipping operations, our vessels will operate in various parts of the world, including to or from United States ports. Unless exempt from United States federal income taxation under Section 883 of the Code, or Section 883, we will be subject to United States federal income taxation, in the manner discussed below, to the extent our shipping income is considered derived from sources within the United States.
Application of Section 883
Under the relevant provisions of Section 883, we will be exempt from United States federal income taxation on its United States source shipping income if:
i.It is organized in a "qualified foreign country", which is one that grants an equivalent exemption from taxation to corporations organized in the United States in respect of the shipping income for which exemption is being claimed under Section 883, and which we refer to as the "country of organization requirement"; and
ii.It can satisfy any one of the following two ownership requirements for more than half the days during the taxable year:
our stock is "primarily and regularly" traded on an established securities market located in the United States or a qualified foreign country, which we refer to as the "Publicly-Traded Test"; or
more than 50% of our stock, in terms of value, is beneficially owned by any combination of one or more individuals who are residents of a qualified foreign country or foreign corporations that satisfy the country of organization requirement and the Publicly-Traded Test.
The United States Treasury Department has recognized Bermuda, our country of incorporation, as a qualified foreign country. In addition, the United States Treasury Department has recognized Liberia, the country of incorporation of certain of our vessel-owning subsidiaries, as a qualified foreign country. Accordingly, we and our vessel owning subsidiaries satisfy the country of organization requirement.

65



Therefore, our eligibility for exemption under Section 883 is wholly dependent upon being able to satisfy one of the stock ownership requirements.
For the 2014 taxable year, Knightsbridge satisfied the Publicly-Traded Test since its common shares were "primarily and regularly" traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. We can provide no assurance that we will continue to be able to satisfy these requirements for any future taxable years.
Taxation in Absence of Section 883 Exemption
To the extent the benefits of Section 883 are unavailable with respect to any item of United States source income, our United States source shipping income, would be subject to a 4% tax imposed by Section 887 of the Code on a gross basis, without the benefit of deductions, which we refer to as the "4% gross basis tax regime". Since under the sourcing rules described above, no more than 50% of our shipping income would be treated as being derived from United States sources, the maximum effective rate of United States federal income tax on our shipping income would never exceed 2% under the 4% gross basis tax regime. Historically, the amount of this tax would not have been material.
Gain on Sale of Vessels
Regardless of whether we qualify for exemption under Section 883, we will not be subject to United States federal income taxation with respect to gain realized on a sale of a vessel, provided the sale is considered to occur outside of the United States under United States federal income tax principles. In general, a sale of a vessel will be considered to occur outside of the United States for this purpose if title to the vessel, and risk of loss with respect to the vessel, pass to the buyer outside of the United States. It is expected that any sale of a vessel by us will be considered to occur outside of the United States.
Taxation of United States Holders
The following is a discussion of the material United States federal income tax considerations relevant to an investment decision by a United States Holder, as defined below, with respect to the common shares. This summarydiscussion is not intended to be applicable to all categories of investors, such as dealers in securities, banks, thrifts or other financial institutions, insurance companies, regulated investment companies, tax-exempt organizations, United States expatriates, persons that hold common shares as part of a straddle, conversion transaction or hedge, persons who own 10% or more of our outstanding stock, persons deemed to sell common shares under the constructive sale provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, a United States Holder whose "functional currency" is other than the United States dollar, or holders subject to the alternative minimum tax, each of which may be subject to special rules. In addition, this discussion is limited to persons who hold common shares as "capital assets" (generally, property held for investment) within the meaning of Code Section 1221.
If an entity treated as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes holds common shares, the United States federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. Partnerships holding common shares and partners in such partnerships are encouraged to consult their own tax advisors.
United States Federal Income Tax Considerations

47



In the opinion of Seward & Kissel LLP, our United States counsel, the following are the material United States federal income tax consequences to us of our activities and to United States Holders and Non-United States Holders of our common shares. The following discussion of U.S. federal income tax matters is based on the Code, judicial decisions, administrative pronouncements, and existing and proposed regulations issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. Except as otherwise noted, this discussion is based on the assumption that we will not maintain an office or other fixed place of business within the United States.
Taxation of the Company's Shipping Income: In General
The Company anticipates that it will derive substantially all of its gross income from the use and operation of vessels in international commerce and that this income will principally consist of freights from the transportation of cargoes, charterhire from time or voyage charters and the performance of services directly related thereto, which the Company refers to as "shipping income".
Shipping income that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the United States will be considered to be 50% derived from sources within the United States. Shipping income attributable to transportation that both begins and ends in the United States will be considered to be 100% derived from sources within the United States. The Company is not permitted by law to engage in transportation that gives rise to 100% United States source income.
Shipping income attributable to transportation exclusively between non-United States ports will be considered to be 100% derived from sources outside the United States. Shipping income derived from sources outside the United States will not be subject to United States federal income tax.
Based upon the Company's current and anticipated shipping operations, the Company's vessels will operate in various parts of the world, including to or from United States ports. Unless exempt from United States federal income taxation under Section 883 of the Code, or Section 883, the Company will be subject to United States federal income taxation, in the manner discussed below, to the extent its shipping income is considered derived from sources within the United States.
Application of Section 883
Under the relevant provisions of Section 883, the Company will be exempt from United States federal income taxation on its United States source shipping income if:
i.It is organized in a "qualified foreign country", which is one that grants an equivalent exemption from taxation to corporations organized in the United States in respect of the shipping income for which exemption is being claimed under Section 883, and which the Company refers to as the "country of organization requirement"; and
ii.It can satisfy any one of the following two ownership requirements for more than half the days during the taxable year:
the Company's stock is "primarily and regularly" traded on an established securities market located in the United States or a qualified foreign country, which the Company refers to as the "Publicly-Traded Test"; or
more than 50% of the Company's stock, in terms of value, is beneficially owned by any combination of one or more individuals who are residents of a qualified foreign country or foreign corporations that satisfy the country of organization requirement and the Publicly-Traded Test.
The United States Treasury Department has recognized Bermuda, the country of incorporation of the Company, as a qualified foreign country. In addition, the United States Treasury Department has recognized Liberia, the country of incorporation of certain of the Company's vessel-owning subsidiaries, as a qualified foreign country. Accordingly, the Company and its vessel owning subsidiaries satisfy the country of organization requirement.
Therefore, the Company's eligibility for exemption under Section 883 is wholly dependent upon being able to satisfy one of the stock ownership requirements.
For the 2012 taxable year, the Company satisfied the Publicly-Traded Test since, on more than half the days of the taxable year, the Company's common shares were primarily and regularly traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

48



Taxation in Absence of Section 883 Exemption
To the extent the benefits of Section 883 are unavailable with respect to any item of United States source income, the Company's United States source shipping income, would be subject to a 4% tax imposed by Section 887 of the Code on a gross basis, without the benefit of deductions, which the Company refers to as the "4% gross basis tax regime". Since under the sourcing rules described above, no more than 50% of the Company's shipping income would be treated as being derived from United States sources, the maximum effective rate of United States federal income tax on the Company's shipping income would never exceed 2% under the 4% gross basis tax regime.
Gain on Sale of Vessels
Regardless of whether the Company qualifies for exemption under Section 883, the Company will not be subject to United States federal income taxation with respect to gain realized on a sale of a vessel, provided the sale is considered to occur outside of the United States under United States federal income tax principles. In general, a sale of a vessel will be considered to occur outside of the United States for this purpose if title to the vessel, and risk of loss with respect to the vessel, pass to the buyer outside of the United States. It is expected that any sale of a vessel by the Company will be considered to occur outside of the United States.
Taxation of United States Holders
The following is a discussion of the material United States federal income tax considerations relevant to an investment decision by a United States Holder with respect to the common shares. This discussion does not purport to deal with the tax consequences of owning common shares to all categories of investors, some of which, such as dealers in securities, tax-exempt organizations, investors whose functional currency is not the United States dollar and investors that own, actually or under applicable constructive ownership rules, 10% or more of the Company's common shares may be subject to special rules. You are encouraged to consult your own tax advisors concerning the overall tax consequences arising in your own particular situation under United States federal, state, local or foreign law of the ownership of common shares.
 
As used herein, the term "United States Holder" means a beneficial owner of common shares that (i) is a United States citizen or resident, a United States corporation or other United States entity taxable as a corporation, an estate, the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source, or a trust if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary jurisdiction over the administration of the trust and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust and (ii) owns common shares as a capital asset, generally, for investment purposes.
 
If a partnership holds common shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner in a partnership holding common shares, you are encouraged to consult your own tax advisor regarding the United States federal income tax consequences of owning an interest in a partnership that holds common shares.

Distributions
 
Subject to the discussion of passive foreign investment companies below, any distributions made by the Companyus with respect to common shares to a United States Holder will generally constitute dividends, which may be taxable as ordinary income or "qualified dividend income" as described in more detail below, to the extent of the Company'sour current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under United States federal income tax principles. Distributions in excess of the Company'sour earnings and profits will be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the United States Holder's tax basis in its common shares on a dollar-for-dollar basis and thereafter as capital gain. Because the Company iswe are not a United States corporation, United States Holders that are corporations will not be entitled to claim a dividends-received deduction with respect to any distributions they receive from the Company.us.
 

66



Dividends paid on common shares to a United States Holder which is an individual, trust or estate (a "United States Non-Corporate Holder") will generally be treated as "qualified dividend income" that is taxable to such shareholder at preferential United States federal income tax rates provided that (1) common shares are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States (such as the NASDAQ Global Select Market on which the common shares are listed); (2) the Company iswe are not a passive foreign investment company for the taxable year during which the dividend is paid or the immediately preceding taxable year (which the Company doeswe do not believe it is, haswe are, have been since the beginning of itsour 2004 taxable year, or will be); and (3) the United States Non-Corporate Holder has owned common shares for more than 60 days in the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the date on which the common shares become ex-dividend.
 

49



Any dividends paid by the Companyus which are not eligible for these preferential rates will be taxed as ordinary income to a United States Holder.
 
Sale, Exchange or other Disposition of Our Common Shares
 
Assuming the Company doeswe do not constitute a passive foreign investment company for any taxable year, a United States Holder generally will recognize taxable gain or loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of the Company'sour common shares in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized by the United States Holder from such sale, exchange or other disposition and the United States Holder's tax basis in the common shares. Such gain or loss will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the United States Holder's holding period in the common shares is greater than one year at the time of the sale, exchange or other disposition. A United States Holder's ability to deduct capital losses is subject to certain limitations.
 
Passive Foreign Investment Company Status and Significant Tax Consequences
 
Special United States federal income tax rules apply to a United States Holder that holds stock in a foreign corporation classified as a passive foreign investment company, or a PFIC, for United States federal income tax purposes. In general, the Companywe will be treated as a PFIC with respect to a United States Holder if, for any taxable year in which such holder held the Company'sour common shares, either;

at least 75% of the Company'sour gross income for such taxable year consists of passive income (e.g., dividends, interest, capital gains and rents derived other than in the active conduct of a rental business); or

at least 50% of the average value of the assets held by the Companyus during such taxable year produce, or are held for the production of, passive income.
 
For purposes of determining whether the Company iswe are a PFIC, the Companywe will be treated as earning and owning its proportionate share of the income and assets, respectively, of any of its subsidiary corporations in which it owns at least 25% of the value of the subsidiary's stock. Income earned, or deemed earned, by the Companyus in connection with the performance of services would not constitute passive income. By contrast, rental income would generally constitute "passive income" unless the Company iswe are treated under specific rules as deriving itsour rental income in the active conduct of a trade or business.
 
The CompanyKnightsbridge was a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes through its 2003 taxable year. The CompanyIt has not been a PFIC beginning with its 2004 taxable year. United States Holders who held the Company'sKnightsbridge's common shares prior to the 2004 taxable year are encouraged to consult their tax advisors regarding the proper tax treatment of any dispositions of common shares and any distributions by the Company.Knightsbridge.

Based on the Company'sour current operations and future projections, the Company doeswe do not believe that it iswe are or that itKnightsbridge has been since the beginning of its 2004 taxable year, nor does itdo we expect to become, a PFIC with respect to any taxable year. Although there is no legal authority directly on this point, the Company'sour belief is based principally on the position that, for purposes of determining whether the Company iswe are a PFIC, the gross income the Company deriveswe derive or isare deemed to derive from the time chartering, bareboat chartering and voyage chartering activities should constitute services income, rather than rental income. Correspondingly, the Company believeswe believe that such income does not constitute passive income, and the assets that the Companywe or itsour wholly-owned subsidiaries own and operate in connection with the production of such income, in particular, the vessels, do not constitute assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income for purposes of determining whether the Company iswe are a PFIC.
 
Although there is no direct legal authority under the PFIC rules, the Company believeswe believe there is substantial legal authority supporting itsour position consisting of case law and United States Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, pronouncements concerning the characterization of income derived from time charters, bareboat charters and voyage charters as services income for other tax purposes. However, there is also authority which characterizes time charter income as rental income rather than services income for other tax purposes. Accordingly, in the absence of any legal authority specifically relating to the Code provisions governing PFICs, the IRS or a court

67



could disagree with our position. In addition, although the Company intendswe intend to conduct itsour affairs in such a manner as to avoid being classified as a PFIC with respect to any taxable year, there can be no assurance that the nature of itsour operations will not change in the future.
 
As discussed more fully below, if the Companywe were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, a United States Holder would be subject to different taxation rules depending on whether the United States Holder makes an election to treat the Companyus as a "Qualified Electing Fund", which the Company referswe refer to as a "QEF election". As an alternative to making a QEF election, a United States Holder should be able to elect to mark-to-market the Company'sour common shares, which the Company referswe refer to as a "Mark-to-Market election" as discussed below.

50



 
Taxation of United States Holders Making a Timely QEF Election
 
If a United States Holder makes a timely QEF election, which United States Holder is referred to by the Companyus as an "Electing United States Holder", the Electing United States Holder must report each year for United States federal income tax purposes its pro rata share of the Company'sour ordinary earnings and itsour net capital gain, if any, for the Company'sour taxable year that ends with or within the taxable year of the Electing United States Holder, regardless of whether or not distributions were received from the Companyus by the Electing United States Holder. The Electing United States Holder's adjusted tax basis in the common shares will be increased to reflect taxed but undistributed earnings and profits. Distributions of earnings and profits that had been previously taxed will result in a corresponding reduction in the adjusted tax basis in the common shares and will not be taxed again once distributed. An Electing United States Holder would generally recognize capital gain or loss on the sale, exchange or other disposition of the common shares. A United States Holder will be eligible to make a QEF election with respect to its common shares only if the Company provideswe provide the United States Holder with annual tax information relating to the Company.us. There can be no assurance that the Companywe will provide such tax information on an annual basis.
 
Taxation of United States Holders Making a "Mark-to-Market" Election
 
Alternatively, if the Companywe were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year and, as anticipated, the common shares are treated as "marketable stock", a United States Holder would be allowed to make a Mark-to-Market election with respect to the Company'sour common shares. If that election is made, the United States Holder generally would include as ordinary income in each taxable year the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the common shares at the end of the taxable year over such holder's adjusted tax basis in the common shares. The United States Holder would also be permitted an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, if any, of the United States Holder's adjusted tax basis in the common shares over its fair market value at the end of the taxable year, but only to the extent of the net amount previously included in income as a result of the Mark-to-Market election. A United States Holder's tax basis in its common shares would be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss amount. Gain realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of the common shares would be treated as ordinary income, and any loss realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of the common shares would be treated as ordinary loss to the extent that such loss does not exceed the net mark-to-market gains previously included by the United States Holder.
 
Taxation of United States Holders Not Making a Timely QEF or Mark-to-Market Election
 
Finally, if the Companywe were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, a United States Holder who does not make either a QEF election or a Mark-to-Market election for that year, who is referred to as a "Non-Electing United States Holder", would be subject to special rules with respect to (1) any excess distribution (i.e., the portion of any distributions received by the Non-Electing United States Holder on the common shares in a taxable year in excess of 125% of the average annual distributions received by the Non-Electing United States Holder in the three preceding taxable years, or, if shorter, the Non-Electing United States Holder's holding period for the common shares), and (2) any gain realized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of the common shares. Under these special rules:

the excess distribution or gain would be allocated ratably over the Non-Electing United States Holders' aggregate holding period for the common shares;
the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any taxable years before the Companywe became a PFIC would be taxed as ordinary income; and
the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years would be subject to tax at the highest rate of tax in effect for the applicable class of tax payer for that year, and an interest charge for the deemed tax deferral benefit would be imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable to each such other taxable year.
 
These penalties would not apply to a pension or profit sharing trust or other tax-exempt organization that did not borrow funds or otherwise utilize leverage in connection with its acquisition of the common shares. If a Non-Electing United States Holder who

68



is an individual dies while owning the common shares, the successor of such deceased Non-Electing United States Holder generally would not receive a step-up in tax basis with respect to such stock.
 
United States Federal Income Taxation of "Non-United States Holders"PFIC Annual Filing Requirements

A beneficial owner of common shares (other thanIf we were to be treated as a partnership) that is notPFIC, a United States Holder is referred to herein as a Non-United States Holder.

51



If a partnership holds the common shares, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner in a partnership holding the common shares, you are encouragedbe required to consult your tax advisor.
Dividendsfile an information return on Common Shares
A Non-United States Holder generally will not be subject to United States federal income tax or withholding tax on dividends received from the Companyan IRS Form 8621 with respect to its ownership of our common shares, unless that income is effectively connected with the Non-United States Holder's conduct of a trade or business in the United States. If the Non-United States Holder is entitled to the benefits of a United States income tax treaty with respect to those dividends, that income is taxable only if it is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the Non-United States Holder in the United States.
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Common Shares
A Non-United States Holder generally will not be subject to United States federal income tax or withholding tax on any gain realized upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of the Company's common shares, unless:

the gain is effectively connected with the Non-United States Holder's conduct of a trade or business in the United States (and, if the Non-United States Holder is entitled to the benefits of an income tax treaty with respect to that gain, that gain is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by the Non-United States Holder in the United States); or

the Non-United States Holder is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year of disposition and other conditions are met.
If the Non-United States Holder is engaged in a United States trade or business for United States federal income tax purposes, the income from the common shares, including dividends and the gain from the sale, exchange or other disposition of the shares, that is effectively connected with the conduct of that trade or business will generally be subject to regular United States federal income tax in the same manner as discussed in the previous section relating to the taxation of United States Holders. In addition, if you are a corporate Non-United States Holder, your earnings and profits that are attributable to the effectively connected income, which are subject to certain adjustments, may be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a rate of 30%, or at a lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.stock.
 
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
 
In general, dividend payments, or other taxable distributions, made within the United States to a holder of common shares will be subject to information reporting requirements. Such payments will also be subject to "backup withholding" if paid to a non-corporate United States Holder who:

fails to provide an accurate tax payer identification number;
is notified by the IRS that he has failed to report all interest or dividends required to be shown on his United States federal income tax returns; or
in certain circumstances, fails to comply with applicable certification requirements.
 
If a holder sells his common shares to or through a United States office of a broker, the payment of the proceeds is subject to both United States information reporting and backup withholding unless the holder establishes an exemption. If a holder sells his common shares through a non-United States office of a non-United States broker and the sales proceeds are paid to the holder outside the United States, then information reporting and backup withholding generally will not apply to that payment. However, United States information reporting requirements, but not backup withholding, will apply to a payment of sales proceeds, including a payment made to a holder outside the United States, if the holder sells his common shares through a non-United States office of a broker that is a United States person or has some other contacts with the United States.
 
Non-United States Holders may be required to establish their exemption from information reporting and backup withholding by certifying their status on an applicable IRS Form W-8BEN, W-8ECI or W-8IMY, as applicable.W-8.
 
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, a taxpayer generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under backup withholding rules that exceed the tax payer'staxpayer's income tax liability by filing a refund claim with the IRS.
 

52Other U.S. Information Reporting Obligations



Pursuant to recently enacted legislation, individualsIndividuals who are United States Holders (and to the extent specified in applicable Treasury regulations, certain United States entities and Non-United States Holders) who hold "specified foreign financial assets" (as defined in Section 6038D of the Code) are required to file IRS Form 8938 with information relating to the asset for each taxable year in which the aggregate value of all such assets exceeds $75,000 at any time during the taxable year or $50,000 on the last day of the taxable year (or such higher dollar amount as prescribed by applicable Treasury regulations). Specified foreign financial assets would include, among other assets, our common shares, unless the common shares held through an account maintained with a United States financial institution. Substantial penalties apply to any failure to timely file IRS Form 8938, unless the failure is shown to be due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. Additionally, in the event an individual United States Holder (and to the extent specified in applicable Treasury regulations, a United States entity or Non-United States Holder) that is required to file IRS Form 8938 does not file such form, the statute of limitations on the assessment and collection of United States federal income taxes of such holder for the related tax year may not close until three years after the date that the required information is filed. United States Holders (including United States entities) and Non-United States Holders are encouraged consult their own tax advisors regarding their reporting obligations under this legislation.
 
Bermuda Taxation
 
As of the date of this annual report, we are not subject to taxation under the laws of Bermuda and distributions to us by our subsidiaries also are not subject to any Bermuda tax. As of the date of this document, there is no Bermuda income, corporation or profits tax, withholding tax, capital gains tax, capital transfer tax, estate duty or inheritance tax payable by non-residents of Bermuda in respect of capital gains realized on a disposition of our common shares or in respect of distributions by us with respect to our common shares. This does not, however, apply to the taxation of persons ordinarily resident in Bermuda. Bermuda holders should

69



consult their own tax advisors regarding possible Bermuda taxes with respect to dispositions of, and distributions on, our common shares.
 
The Minister of Finance in Bermuda has granted the Companyus a tax exempt status until March 31, 2035, under which no income taxes or other taxes (other than duty on goods imported into Bermuda and payroll tax in respect of any Bermuda-resident employees) are payable by the Companyus in Bermuda. If the Minister of Finance in Bermuda does not grant a new exemption or extend the current tax exemption, and if the Bermudian Parliament passes legislation imposing taxes on exempted companies, the Companywe may become subject to taxation in Bermuda after March 31, 2035.
 
Currently, there are no withholding taxes payable in Bermuda on dividends distributed by the Companyus to itsour shareholders.
 
Liberian Taxation
 
Under the Consolidated Tax Amendments Act of 2010, our Liberian subsidiaries should be considered non-resident Liberian corporations which are wholly exempted from Liberian taxation effective as of 1977.
 
F.  DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS

Not applicable.

G.  STATEMENT BY EXPERTS

Not applicable.

H.  DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In accordance with these requirements, we file reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These materials, including this annual report and the accompanying exhibits, may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the Commission 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580 Washington, D.C. 20549.  You may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling 1 (800) SEC-0330, and you may obtain copies at prescribed rates from the public reference facilities maintained by the Commission at its principal office in Washington, D.C. 20549.  The Commission maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov.) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Commission. In addition, documents referred to in this annual report may be inspected at our principal executive offices at Par-la-Ville Place, 14 Par-la-Ville Road, Hamilton, Bermuda HM 08.
 
I.  SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION


53



Not applicable.
 
ITEM 11.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company isKnightsbridge was exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates primarily resulting from the floating rate of the Company'sKnightsbridge's borrowings. The Company doesKnightsbridge did not currently utilize interest rate swaps to manage such interest rate risk. The Company hasKnightsbridge did not enteredenter into any financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

The Company'sKnightsbridge's borrowings as of December 31, 20122014 of $111.7$363.5 million, compared to $153.7$95.0 million as of December 31, 2011,2013, bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin. A 1% change in interest rates would increase or decrease interest expense by $1.1$3.6 million per year as of December 31, 2012.2014. The fair value of the loan facility at December 31, 20122014 was equal to the carrying amount of the facility at the same date.

Although the Company'sour activities are conducted worldwide, the international shipping industry's functional currency is the United States Dollar and virtually all of the Company'sour operating revenues and most of itsour anticipated cash expenses are expected to be denominated in United States Dollars. Accordingly, the Company'sour operating revenues are not expected to be adversely affected by movements in currency exchange rates or the imposition of currency controls in the jurisdictions in which the vessels operate.

ITEM 12.    DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Not applicable.


5470



PART II

ITEM 13.    DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

None.

ITEM 14.    MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 15.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

a)   Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Management assessed the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company'sour disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report as of December 31, 2011.2014. Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company'sour disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the evaluation date.
 
b)   Management's annual report on internal controls over financial reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company'sour principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company's Board,our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Company's management and directors; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management conducted the evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting using the control criteria framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) published in its report entitled Internal Control-Integrated Framework.Framework (2013).
 
Our management with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer assessed the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company'sour internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of December 31, 2012.2014. Based upon that evaluation, our management with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company'sour internal controls over financial reporting are effective as of December 31, 2012.2014.
 
The effectiveness of the Company'sour internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20122014 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers AS, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.

c)   Attestation report of the registered public accounting firm
 

5571



The independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements, PricewaterhouseCoopers AS, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2014, appearing under Item 18, and such report is incorporated herein by reference.
 
d)   Changes in internal control over financial reporting
 
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that have materially effectedaffected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company'sour internal control over financial reporting.
 
ITEM 16.      [Reserved]

ITEM 16A.    AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
 
The Board has determined that the Company's audit committee has one audit committee financial expert. Mr. David White, who is an independent director, and is theour audit committeecommittee's financial expert.

ITEM 16B.    CODE OF ETHICS

The Company hasWe have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all entities controlled by the Companyus and all of our employees, directors, officers and agents of the Company, including representatives and agents of the Company's General Manager. The Company hasagents. We have posted a copy of itsour code of ethics on itsour website at www.knightsbridgetankers.com. The Companywww.goldenocean.bm. We will provide any person, free of charge, a copy of itsour code of ethics upon written request to the Company'sour registered office.

ITEM 16C.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Our principal accountant for 20122014 and 20112013 was PricewaterhouseCoopers AS. The following table sets forth for the two most recent fiscal years the fees paid or accrued for audit and services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers AS.
(in thousands of $)2012
 2011
2014
 2013
Audit Fees (a)343
 401
640
 379
Audit-Related Fees (b)
 

 
Tax Fees (c)
 

 
All Other Fees (d)
 

 
Total343
 401
640
 379

(a)           Audit Fees
Audit fees represent professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and services provided by the principal accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. The amount in 2014 includes $275,000 for costs incurred in connection with the F-4 Registration Statement, filed on November 17, 2014, in connection with the 61.5 million shares to be issued as consideration for the Merger. The amount in 2013 includes $115,000 for costs incurred in connection with the Prospectus Supplement, filed on October 17, 2013, in connection with the offering of 6,000,000 new ordinary shares.

(b)           Audit–Related Fees
Audit-related fees consisted of assurance and related services rendered by the principal accountant related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements which have not been reported under Audit Fees above.

(c)           Tax Fees
Tax fees represent fees for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

(d)           All Other Fees
All other fees include services other than audit fees, audit-related fees and tax fees set forth above.

Our Board has adopted pre-approval policies and procedures in compliance with paragraph (c)(7)(i) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X that require the Board to approve the appointment of theour independent auditor of the Company before such auditor is engaged and approve each of the audit and non-audit related services to be provided to us by such auditor under such engagement by the Company.engagement. All services provided by the principal auditor in 20122014 were approved by the Company's Board pursuant to the pre-approval policy.

ITEM 16D.    EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES


5672




Not applicable.

ITEM 16E.    PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

None.

ITEM 16F.    CHANGE IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

Not applicable.

ITEM 16G.    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Pursuant to the NASDAQ listing standards available to foreign private issuers, we are not required to comply with all of the corporate governance practices followed by U.S. companies under the NASDAQ listing standards.  The significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the NASDAQ standards applicable to listed U.S. companies are set forth below.
 
Executive Sessions. NASDAQ requires that non-management directors meet regularly in executive sessions without management.  As permitted under Bermuda law and our bye-laws, our non-management directors do not regularly hold executive sessions without management and we do not expect them to do so in the future.
Audit Committee.  NASDAQ requires, among other things, that a listed U.S company have an audit committee with a minimum of three independent members.  As permitted under Bermuda law and our bye-laws, our audit committee consists of two members which currently meets the NASDAQ independence requirements.
 
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee.  NASDAQ requires that a listed U.S. company have a nominating/corporate governance committee composed solely of independent directors.  As permitted under Bermuda law and our bye-laws, we do not currently have a nominating or corporate governance committee.  Our Board is responsible for identifying and recommending potential candidates to become board members and recommending directors for appointment to board committees.
 
Compensation Committee.  NASDAQ requires that a listed U.S. company have a compensation committee composed solely of independent directors.  As permitted under Bermuda law and our bye-laws, compensation of executive officers is not required to be determined by a committee composed of independent members.
 
Related Party Transactions.  NASDAQ requires that a listed U.S. company conduct appropriate review and oversight of all related party transactions for potential conflict of interest situations on an ongoing basis by the company's audit committee or another independent body of the board of directors.  As permitted under Bermuda law and our bye-laws, our directors are not prohibited from being a party to, or otherwise interested in, any transaction or arrangement with us or in which we are otherwise interested, provided that the director makes proper disclosure of same as required by our bye-laws and Bermuda law.
 
Proxy Materials.  NASDAQ requires that a listed U.S. company solicit proxies and provide proxy statements for all shareholder meetings. Such company must also provide copies of its proxy solicitation to NASDAQ.  As permitted under Bermuda law and our bye-laws, we do not currently solicit proxies or provide proxy materials to NASDAQ.  Our bye-laws also require that we notify our shareholders of meetings no less than 5 days before the meeting.

ITEM 16H    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.


5773



PART III

ITEM 17.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 18.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following financial statements listed below and set forth on pages F-1 through F-19F-27 are filed as part of this annual report:

Consolidated Financial Statements of Knightsbridge TankersGolden Ocean Group Limited

  
  
  
  
  
  


5874




ITEM 19.  EXHIBITS

Number Description of Exhibit

 
1.1 
Memorandum of Association, of the Companyas amended (1)
1.2Certificate of Name Change
1.3Certificate of Change of Share Capital
1.4Amended and Restated Bye-Laws
   
4.1 
2010 Equity Incentive Plan (2)
   
4.2
Registration Rights Agreement by and between Knightsbridge, Frontline 2012 Ltd. and Hemen Holding Limited, dated April 23, 2014 (3)

4.3
Acquisition Agreement between Frontline 2012 Ltd. and Knightsbridge, dated April 3, 2014 (3)
4.4 
AmendedMemorandum of Agreement between Karpasia Shipping Inc. and Restated General Management Agreement entered into between the Company and ICB Shipping (Bermuda) LimitedKTL Bromley Inc., dated April 3, 2014 (3)
   
4.5 
Dry bulk Commercial ManagementSubscription and Settlement Agreement entered intoby and between the CompanyKnightsbridge, KTL Bromley Inc., Karpasia Shipping Inc. and Golden Ocean ManagementHemen Holding Limited, dated April 3, 2014(3)

   
4.6 
SupplementalSecond Registration Rights Agreement by and between Knightsbridge and Frontline 2012 Ltd., dated September 15, 2014 (4)

4.7
Registration Rights Agreement by and between Knightsbridge and Frontline 2012 Ltd., dated March 16, 2015 (5)
4.8
Acquisition Agreement between Frontline 2012 Ltd. and Knightsbridge, dated September 15, 2014 (4)
4.9
Addendum to Dry bulk Commercial ManagementAcquisition Agreement (Golden Zhejiang joinsbetween Frontline 2012 Ltd. and Knightsbridge, dated March 13, 2015 (5)
4.10
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as party)of October 7, 2014 between Knightsbridge Shipping Limited and Golden Ocean Group Limited (3)(6)
   
8.1 Significant Subsidiaries
   
12.1 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
   
12.2 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
   
13.1 Principal Executive Officer Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
13.2 Principal Financial Officer Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
15.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
   
101. 
INS XBRL Instance Document(4)
   
101. 
SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema(4)
   
101. 
CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Calculation Linkbase(4)
   
101. 
DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Definition Linkbase(4)
   
101. 
LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Label Linkbase(4)
   
101. 
PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Presentation Linkbase (4)
   
(1) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 4.1 in the Company'sour Registration Statement on Form F-1,F-3 (File No. 333-164007) filed with the Commission on December 13, 1996.24, 2009.
   
(2) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 2 of the Company'sour Report on Form 6-K filed September 27, 2010.
   
(3) 
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual ReportSchedule 13D (File No. 005-50787) filed with the Commission on Form 20-F forMay 5, 2014.


75



(4)
Incorporated by reference to the year ended December 31, 2010,Schedule 13D/A (File No. 005-50787) filed with the Commission on March 18, 2011.October 9, 2014.

   
(45) Pursuant
Incorporated by reference to Rule 406Tour Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-203035) filed with the Commission on March 26, 2015.

(6)
Incorporated by reference to Appendix A of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 ofour Registration Statement on Form F-4 (File No. 333-200319), declared effective by the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability under such sections.Commission on February 25, 2015.




5976



SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

KNIGHTSBRIDGE TANKERSGOLDEN OCEAN GROUP LIMITED
 
/s/ Inger M. KlempBirgitte Ringstad Vartdal 
Inger M. KlempBirgitte Ringstad Vartdal 
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer 
Dated:  April 15, 201329, 2015


6077



Consolidated Financial Statements of Knightsbridge TankersGolden Ocean Group Limited

  
  
  
  
  


F-1



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Knightsbridge Tankers Limited.

Golden Ocean Group Limited

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of cash flows and consolidated statements of changes in equity present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Knightsbridge TankersGolden Ocean Group Limited and its subsidiaries at December 31, 20122014 and December 31, 2011,2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20122014 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Annual Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting appearing under itemItem 15(b) of Knightsbridge TankersGolden Ocean Group Limited's Annual Report on Form 20-F. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers AS
 
PricewaterhouseCoopers AS
Oslo, Norway
April 15, 201329, 2015


F-2



Knightsbridge TankersGolden Ocean Group Limited
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 20122014, 20112013 and 20102012
(in thousands of $, except per share data)


 2012
 2011
 2010
 2014
 2013
 2012
Operating revenues            
Time charter revenues 35,046
 55,497
 40,825
 22,656
 27,677
 35,046
Voyage charter revenues 2,269
 
 
 53,706
 9,869
 2,269
Other operating income 20,353
 
 
Total operating revenues 37,315
 55,497
 40,825
 96,715
 37,546
 37,315
Operating expenses  
  
  
  
  
  
Voyage expenses and commission 4,323
 2,020
 1,151
 33,955
 6,809
 4,323
Ship operating expenses 7,608
 7,830
 5,211
 18,676
 7,897
 7,608
Administrative expenses 4,259
 3,528
 3,018
 5,037
 4,937
 4,259
Depreciation 11,117
 11,079
 7,887
 19,561
 11,079
 11,117
Total operating expenses 27,307
 24,457
 17,267
 77,229
 30,722
 27,307
Net operating income 10,008
 31,040
 23,558
 19,486
 6,824
 10,008
Other income (expenses)  
  
  
  
  
  
Interest income 106
 36
 46
 29
 41
 106
Interest expense (3,765) (3,529) (2,880) (2,525) (2,827) (3,765)
Other financial items (467) (489) (579) (737) (508) (467)
Net other expenses (4,126) (3,982) (3,413) (3,233) (3,294) (4,126)
Net income from continuing operations 5,882
 27,058
 20,145
 16,253
 3,530
 5,882
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations (59,311) 5,594
 18,412
Net (loss) income (53,429) 32,652
 38,557
Net loss from discontinued operations (258) (7,433) (59,311)
Net income (loss) 15,995
 (3,903) (53,429)
            
Per share information:  
  
  
  
  
  
Earnings per share from continuing operations: basic $0.24
 $1.11
 $1.05
 $0.31
 $0.14
 $0.24
Earnings per share from continuing operations: diluted $0.24
 $1.10
 $1.05
 $0.31
 $0.14
 $0.24
(Loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations: basic $(2.43) $0.23
 $0.97
(Loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations : diluted $(2.41) $0.23
 $0.97
(Loss) earnings per share: basic $(2.19) $1.34
 $2.02
(Loss) earnings per share: diluted $(2.17) $1.33
 $2.02
Loss per share from discontinued operations: basic $
 $(0.29) $(2.43)
Loss per share from discontinued operations: diluted $
 $(0.29) $(2.41)
Earnings (loss) per share: basic $0.30
 $(0.15) $(2.19)
Earnings (loss) per share: diluted $0.30
 $(0.15) $(2.17)
Cash distributions per share declared $1.20
 $2.00
 $1.70
 $0.63
 $0.70
 $1.20

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-3



Knightsbridge TankersGolden Ocean Group Limited
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20122014 and 20112013
(in thousands of $)

 2012
 2011
 2014
 2013
ASSETS        
Current assets        
Cash and cash equivalents 79,259
 46,848
 42,221
 98,250
Trade accounts receivable, net 2,102
 7,721
 2,770
 3,298
Related party receivables 449
 
Other receivables 2,691
 3,674
 3,430
 943
Inventories 1,181
 3,791
 13,243
 1,729
Voyage in progress 
 931
Voyages in progress 1,322
 
Prepaid expenses and accrued income 616
 3,413
 844
 521
Total current assets 85,849
 66,378
 64,279
 104,741
Restricted cash 15,000
 15,000
 18,923
 15,000
Vessels, net 273,826
 436,273
 852,665
 262,747
Vessel held for sale 21,523
 
Newbuildings 323,340
 26,706
Deferred charges 1,222
 2,110
 3,533
 664
Other long term assets 
 1,458
Total assets 397,420
 521,219
 1,262,740
 409,858
        
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY  
  
  
  
Current liabilities  
  
  
  
Current portion of long-term debt 4,700
 3,600
 19,812
 
Related party payables 
 319
 2,555
 
Trade accounts payable 1,277
 2,056
 4,937
 1,430
Accrued expenses 2,501
 4,514
 4,190
 2,364
Deferred charter revenue 3,020
 658
 3,285
 3,623
Total current liabilities 11,498
 11,147
 34,779
 7,417
Long-term liabilities  
  
  
  
Long-term debt 106,978
 150,140
 343,688
 95,000
Deferred charter revenue 1,250
 
Total liabilities 119,726
 161,287
 378,467
 102,417
Commitments and contingencies 

 

 

 

Equity  
  
  
  
Share capital (24,437,000 shares outstanding, par value $0.01, 2011: 24,425,699) 244
 244
Share capital (80,121,550 shares outstanding, par value $0.01, 2013: 30,472,061) 801
 305
Additional paid in capital 131,766
 131,256
 772,863
 183,535
Contributed capital surplus 149,700
 179,019
 111,614
 131,520
Retained (deficit) earnings (4,016) 49,413
Retained deficit (1,005) (7,919)
Total equity 277,694
 359,932
 884,273
 307,441
Total liabilities and equity 397,420
 521,219
 1,262,740
 409,858


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-4



Knightsbridge TankersGolden Ocean Group Limited
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 20122014, 20112013 and 20102012
(in thousands of $)
 
 2012
 2011
 2010
 2014
 2013
 2012
Net (loss) income (53,429) 32,652
 38,557
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:  
  
  
      
Net income (loss) 15,995
 (3,903) (53,429)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:  
  
  
Depreciation 20,485
 22,759
 19,567
 19,561
 11,079
 20,485
Amortization of deferred charges 879
 599
 652
 685
 558
 879
Net loss on sale of vessels 13,088
 
 
Net (gain) loss on sale of assets 
 (254) 13,088
Impairment loss on vessels 41,597
 
 
 
 5,342
 41,597
Amortization of time charter contract value 2,303
 845
 152
 
 
 2,303
Restricted stock unit expense 906
 230
 
 242
 919
 906
Provision for doubtful accounts 10,155
 1,700
 
 
 226
 10,155
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:  
  
  
  
  
  
Trade accounts receivable (4,536) (7,413) 2,428
 528
 (1,422) (4,536)
Related party balances (319) 388
 (69) 622
 
 (319)
Other receivables 983
 (2,485) (527) (2,487) 1,748
 983
Inventories, net of disposals 1,535
 (2,299) 1,675
 (11,514) (1,189) 1,535
Voyages in progress 931
 (931) 2,679
 (1,322) 
 931
Prepaid expenses and accrued income 1,952
 (1,955) (197) (323) 95
 1,952
Trade accounts payable (943) (1,811) 202
 1,862
 153
 (943)
Accrued expenses (2,400) 1,000
 (2,522) 1,354
 (392) (2,400)
Deferred charter revenue 3,612
 (672) (126) (339) (647) 3,612
Net cash provided by operating activities 36,799
 42,607
 62,471
 24,864
 12,313
 36,799
Investing activities  
  
  
  
  
  
Changes in restricted cash 
 
 (5,000)
Placement of restricted cash (3,924) 
 
Additions to newbuildings 
 
 (3,600) (357,402) (26,706) 
Cash acquired upon purchase of SPCs 68,560
 
 
Purchase of vessels 
 
 (94,000) (24,085) 
 
Proceeds from sale of vessels 66,993
 
 
Net cash provided by (used) in investing activities 66,993
 
 (102,600)
Proceeds from sale of assets 
 17,075
 66,993
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (316,851) (9,631) 66,993
Financing activities  
  
  
  
  
  
Proceeds from long-term debt 
 
 205,740
 270,000
 
 
Repayment of long-term debt (42,062) (3,600) (168,880) (1,500) (16,678) (42,062)
Debt fees paid 
 (79) (2,061) (3,555) 
 
Net proceeds from share issuance 
 
 87,602
 
 51,167
 
Distributions to shareholders (29,319) (48,851) (33,465) (28,987) (18,180) (29,319)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities (71,381) (52,530) 88,936
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 32,411
 (9,923) 48,807
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 235,958
 16,309
 (71,381)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
 (56,029) 18,991
 32,411
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 46,848
 56,771
 7,964
 98,250
 79,259
 46,848
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 79,259
 46,848
 56,771
 42,221
 98,250
 79,259
            
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:  
  
  
  
  
  
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest 4,477
 4,287
 3,598
 5,848
 2,851
 4,477

F-5






Details of non-cash investing and financing activities in the year ended December 31, 20102014 are given in Note 24.


22.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-6



Knightsbridge TankersGolden Ocean Group Limited
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 20102012
(in thousands of $, except number of shares)

 2012
 2011
 2010
 2014
 2013
 2012
Number of shares outstanding            
Balance at beginning of year 24,425,699
 24,425,699
 17,100,000
 30,472,061
 24,437,000
 24,425,699
Shares issued 11,301
 
 7,325,699
 49,649,489
 6,035,061
 11,301
Balance at end of year 24,437,000
 24,425,699
 24,425,699
 80,121,550
 30,472,061
 24,437,000
            
Share capital  
  
  
  
  
  
Balance at beginning of year 244
 244
 171
 305
 244
 244
Shares issued 
 
 73
 496
 61
 
Balance at end of year 244
 244
 244
 801
 305
 244
            
Additional paid in capital  
  
  
  
  
  
Balance at beginning of year 131,256
 131,026
 
 183,535
 131,766
 131,256
Shares issued 
 
 131,026
 589,557
 51,106
 
Restricted stock unit expense 510
 230
 
Restricted stock unit (income) expense (229) 663
 510
Balance at end of year 131,766
 131,256
 131,026
 772,863
 183,535
 131,766
            
Contributed capital surplus  
  
  
  
  
  
Balance at beginning of year 179,019
 179,019
 179,019
 131,520
 149,700
 179,019
Distributions to shareholders (29,319) 
 
 (19,906) (18,180) (29,319)
Balance at end of year 149,700
 179,019
 179,019
 111,614
 131,520
 149,700
            
Retained (deficit) earnings  
  
  
  
  
  
Balance at beginning of year 49,413
 65,612
 60,520
 (7,919) (4,016) 49,413
Net (loss) income (53,429) 32,652
 38,557
Net income (loss) 15,995
 (3,903) (53,429)
Distributions to shareholders 
 (48,851) (33,465) (9,081) 
 
Balance at end of year (4,016) 49,413
 65,612
 (1,005) (7,919) (4,016)
Total equity 277,694
 359,932
 375,901
 884,273
 307,441
 277,694

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-7



Knightsbridge TankersGolden Ocean Group Limited
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1.    DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
 
Knightsbridge Tankers Limited (the "Company") was incorporated in Bermuda in September 1996 and was originally founded for the purpose of owning and operating an initial fleet of five very large crude carriers, or VLCCs. In December 2007, one of these vessels was sold and the Company subsequently expanded the scope of its activities and acquired two Capesize newbuilding dry bulk vessels in 2009 and two 2010-built Capesize dry bulk vessels in 2010. In 2012, three VLCCs were sold and the last remaining VLCC was sold in March 2013. In October 2014, the Company changed its name to Knightsbridge Shipping Limited. The Company's shares are listed on the NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol "VLCCF."“VLCCF.”

Up to completion of the Merger on March 31, 2015 (see below), the Company's dry bulk carriers were managed by Golden Ocean Management (Bermuda) Ltd., or the Dry Bulk Manager, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Golden Ocean Group Limited, or the Former Golden Ocean, a dry bulk shipping company based in Bermuda and listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange, mainly operating in the Capesize and Panamax market segments. The Company's tankers and dry bulk carriers arewere managed by ICB Shipping (Bermuda) Limited, or the General Manager, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Frontline Ltd., or Frontline, a Bermuda based shipping company whose shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the Oslo Stock Exchange and the London Stock Exchange under the symbol "FRO," and by Golden Ocean Management (Bermuda) Ltd., or the Dry bulk Manager, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Golden Ocean Group Limited, a Bermuda based dry bulk shipping company whose shares are listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange and the Singapore Stock Exchange under the symbol "GOGL." In addition, the General Manager provides us with general administrative and technical services.“FRO”.

Effective July 1, 2011, the daily gross hire rate per the Golden Zhejiang time charter was reduced from $29,900 to $19,900 for a period of one year and the amount of lost revenues resulting from this reduction of $3.66 million were expected to be recovered in the period from July 1, 2012 to September 2, 2014 in accordance with a signed charter party amendment, by payment of an additional charter hire amount of $4,581 per day in addition to the $29,900 per day. As such, there was no change in the total expected charter hire or the total expected charter hire divided by the number of days remaining. The Company did not believe that the reduction and deferral of charter hire had an impact on the fixed and determinable criteria for revenue recognition as the changes were documented in a signed agreement and there were no change to the period over which payments were made, which remains as the period the vessel is being used. Accordingly, the Company accounted for the change in the charter agreement by amortizing the total expected charter hire payments on a straight line basis from July 1, 2011 over the remaining period of the charter party. In July 2012, the charterer of the Golden Zhejiang, Hong Xiang Shipping Holding (Hong Kong) Co Limited, redelivered the vessel before the final maturity of the charter, and the vessel operated in the spot market until September 2012.

Following the sale of three VLCCs duringin 2012 and the last VLCC in 2013, the results of the VLCCs have been recorded as discontinued operations.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company owns owned four Capesize dry bulk vessels and one VLCC. Each of thehad four Capesize dry bulk vessels under construction.

In April 2014, the Company acquired five special purpose companies, or SPCs, from Frontline 2012 Ltd ("Frontline 2012"), each owning a fuel efficient 180,000 dwt Capesize dry bulk newbuilding. This transaction has been accounted for as a purchase of assets and the consideration was settled by the issuance of 15.5 million shares, which were operatingrecorded at a price of $12.54 per share, and $150.0 million was assumed in remaining newbuilding installments. Cash of $43.4 million was acquired on time chartersthe purchase of the five SPCs. Two of the five Capesize newbuildings were delivered to the Company in May 2014 and the remaining three were delivered in June, July and September 2014.

In April 2014, a subsidiary of the Company, or the Subsidiary, and Karpasia Shipping Inc., or Karpasia, entered into an agreement, or the Memorandum of Agreement, whereby the Subsidiary acquired a Capesize dry bulk carrier built in 2013 from Karpasia. $24.0 million was paid in cash on delivery of the bulk carrier in April 2014. To assist the Subsidiary in financing the remaining $31.0 million owed pursuant to the transaction, or the Seller's Credit, the Company and the Subsidiary entered into an agreement with Hemen Holding Limited, or Hemen, and Karpasia on April 3, 2014, or the Subscription and Settlement Agreement, pursuant to which Karpasia transferred and assigned the Seller's Credit to Hemen and on April 23, 2014, Hemen received 3.1 million of the Comapny's common shares, or the Hemen Shares, which were recorded by the Company at a price of $12.54 per share, in full satisfaction of the Seller's Credit.

The Former Golden Ocean, Frontline, Frontline 2012 and Karpasia are affiliates of, or associated with Hemen, a company indirectly controlled by trusts established for the benefit of Mr. John Fredriksen’s immediate family, and together with a number of other large publicly traded companies involved in various sectors of the shipping and oil services industries, in which Hemen is a principal shareholder, are referred to collectively as the Hemen Related Companies.

In April 2014, the Company agreed to acquire twenty-five SPCs from Frontline 2012, each owning a fuel efficient dry bulk newbuilding. In September 2014, the Company acquired thirteen of these SPCs and the transaction has been accounted for as a purchase of assets and the consideration was settled by the issuance of 31.0 million shares, which were recorded at $11.51 per share being the closing share price on the date of the transaction, $490.0 million was assumed in remaining newbuilding installments and cash of $25.1 million was acquired on the purchase of the thirteen SPCs. Three of the thirteen Capesize newbuildings were delivered to the Company in September and October 2014 and the remaining ten are due for delivery in 2015.

As of December 31, 2012: (i)2014, the Company owned thirteen Capesize dry bulk vessels and had 26 Capesize dry bulk vessels under construction.

In March 2015, the Company purchased the 12 remaining SPCs, each owning a fuel efficient Capesize dry bulk newbuilding, from Frontline 2012. The consideration for the 12 SPCs was settled by the issuance of 31.0 million shares and the assumption of

F-8



newbuilding commitments of $404.0 million in respect of these newbuilding contracts, net of a cash payment from Frontline 2012 of $108.6 million. No other working capital balances were acquired.

As of March 31, 2015, and just prior to the Merger described below, the Company owned 18 Capesize dry bulk carriers of which three were on index-related time charters and 15 were operating in the spot market. The Company also has contracts for 21 Capesize newbuildings (including 17 purchased from Frontline 2012).

On October 7, 2014, the Company and the Former Golden Ocean, entered into an agreement and plan of merger, the Merger, pursuant to which the two companies agreed to merge, with the Company as the surviving legal entity. The Merger was completed on March 31, 2015 (see Note 23).

As of March 31, 2015, and following completion of the Merger, we own 47 vessels and have 25 newbuildings under construction. In addition, we have four vessels chartered-in and one vessel owned through a joint venture. Six of the vessels are chartered out on fixed rate time charters and the remainder operate in the spot market or are fixed on index-linked time charter that expired in January 2013 and the vessel then commenced a time charter for a minimum period of 11 months and a maximum period of 13 months at a market index based daily rate: (ii) on time charter until August 2014 at a rate of $46,412 per day less 2.5% commission. The rate was reduced from $52,670 in March 2012 after renegotiations with the charterer: (iii) on time charter until April 2013 earning a rate of $7,350 per day less 6.5% commission: and (iv) on time charter until October 2013 earning a rate of $9,500 per day less 6.25% commission. The VLCC was unfixed as of December 31, 2012 and was being marketed for sale.contracts.

2.   SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The consolidated financial statements include the assets and liabilities of Knightsbridge Tankers Limitedthe Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires that management make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Amounts included inThe combination of Company and the consolidated statement of operationsFormer Golden Ocean will be accounted for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 have been reclassified in order to conform to the 2012 presentation resulting from discontinued operations.

The change in trade accounts receivable, net in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2011 has been expanded to present the change in the provision for doubtful accounts in order to conform to the 2012 presentation.

The Company has revised the classification of its restricted cash balance of $15.0 million as of December 31, 2011 to appropriately present this balance as a non current asset,business combination using the acquisition method of accounting under the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 805, "Business Combinations" ("ASC 805"), with a corresponding decrease in total current assets of the same amount. Such revision, inCompany selected as the opinion of management, is not material to the prior period financial statements.accounting acquirer under this guidance.

F-8




Discontinued operations
The Company has determined that an individual vessel within a vessel class is not a component as defined by the accounting standard as the Company does not believe that the operations of an individual vessel within a vessel class can be clearly distinguished. Generally, the Company believes that all of the vessels in a vessel class represent a component as defined for the purpose of discontinued operations and has presented the operations of the VLCCs as discontinued operations since three of those vessels were sold during 2012 and the remaining VLCC meetsmet the criteria for held for sale at December 31, 2012.

Vessel held for sale
The Company records a vessel as held for sale when it determines that management, having the authority, commits to a plan to sell the vessel, which is available for immediate sale in its present condition, the vessel is being marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its fair value, it is unlikely that there will be significant changes in the plan and a sale is expected within one year.remaining VLCC was sold during 2013.

Reporting and functional currency
The functional currency of the Company and all of its subsidiaries is the United States dollar as all revenues are received in United States dollars and a majority of the Company's expenditures are made in United States dollars. The Company and its subsidiaries report in United States dollars.

Foreign currency
Transactions in foreign currencies during the year are translated into United States dollars at the rates of exchange in effect at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary assets and liabilities are translated using rates of exchange at the balance sheet date. Foreign currency non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated using historical rates of exchange. Foreign currency transaction gains or losses are included in the consolidated statements of operations.

Revenue and expense recognition
Revenues and expenses are recognized on the accruals basis. Revenues are generated from freight billings,voyage charters, time charter and bareboat charter hires. Voyage revenues and expenses are recognized ratably over the estimated length of each voyage and, therefore, are allocated between reporting periods based on the relative transit time in each period. The impact of recognizing voyageVoyage expenses ratably over the length of each voyage is not materially different on a quarterly and annual basis from a method of recognizing such costsare recognized as incurred. Probable losses on voyages are provided for in full at the time such losses can be estimated. Time charter and bareboat charter revenues are recorded over the term of the charter as a service is provided. TheWhen a time charter contract is linked to an index, the Company usesrecognizes revenue for the applicable period based on the actual index for that period.We use a discharge-to-discharge basis in determining percentage of completion for all spot voyages and voyages servicing contracts of affreightment whereby it recognizeswe recognize revenue ratably from when product is discharged (unloaded) at the end of one voyage to when it is discharged after the next voyage.

F-9



However, the Company doeswe did not recognize revenue if a charter haswas not been contractually committed to by a customer and the Company,us, even if the vessel has discharged its cargo and iswas sailing to the anticipated load port on its next voyage.

Demurrage is a form of damages for breaching the period allowed to load and unload cargo in a voyage charter, or the laytime, and is recognized as income according to the terms of the voyage charter contract when the charterer remains in possession of the vessel after the agreed laytime.

Claims for unpaid charter hire and damages for early termination of time charters are recorded upon receipt of cash when collectability is not reasonably assured. Such amounts related to services previously rendered are recorded as time charter revenue. Amounts in excess of services previously rendered are classified as other operating income.

Losses from uncollectible receivables
Losses from uncollectible receivables are accrued when collection of the invoiced revenues is not assured. Management makes a judgment with regards to whether or not this should be recognized as income and if collection is not reasonably assured, no revenue will be recognized until cash has been received. These conditions are considered in relation to individual receivables or in relation to groups of similar types of receivable.

Leases
The charters for the Company's vessels are classified as operating leases for all periods presented.

Cash and cash equivalents
All demand and time deposits and highly liquid, low risk investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered equivalent to cash.

Restricted cash
Restricted cash is the minimum balance that must be maintained at all times in accordance with our loan agreements with DnB and Nordea.Nordea Bank Norge ASA.

Trade accounts receivable
Trade and other receivables are presented net of allowances for doubtful balances. If amounts become uncollectible, they are charged against income when that determination is made.to administrative expenses.

Inventories
Inventories, which are comprised principally of fuel and lubricating oils, are stated at the lower of cost and market value. Cost is determined on a first-in, first-out basis.

Vessels and depreciation

F-9



Vessels are stated at cost less accumulated deprecation. Depreciation is calculated based on cost less estimated residual value, using the straight-line method, over the useful life of each vessel. The useful life of each vessel is deemed to be 25 years. The residual value is calculated by multiplying the lightweight tonnage of the vessel by the market price of scrap per tonne. The market price of scrap per tonne is calculated as the 10 year average, up to the date of delivery of the vessel, across the three main recycling markets (Far East, Indian sub continent and Bangladesh). Residual values are reviewed annually.

On January 1, 2014, the Company effected a change in estimate related to the estimated scrap rate for its four Capesize vessels. The scrap rate was amended from an average of $281 per lightweight ton to $361 per lightweight ton. The resulting change in salvage value has been applied prospectively and reduced deprecation by approximately $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. This change also resulted in an increase in net income of approximately $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. This change did not have an impact on basic and diluted earnings per share.

Newbuildings
The carrying value of the vessels under construction ("Newbuildings") represents the accumulated costs to the balance sheet date which the Company has had to pay by way of purchase installments and other capital expenditures together with capitalized interest and associated finance costs. No charge for depreciation is made until the vessel is available for use.

Interest expense
Interest costs are expensed as incurred except for interest costs that are capitalized. Interest expenses are capitalized during construction of newbuildings based on accumulated expenditures for the applicable project at the Company's current rate of borrowing. The amount of interest expense capitalized in an accounting period shall be determined by applying an interest rate ("the capitalization rate") to the average amount of accumulated expenditures for the asset during the period. The capitalization

F-10



rates used in an accounting period shall be based on the rates applicable to borrowings outstanding during the period. The Company does not capitalize amounts beyond the actual interest expense incurred in the period.

Deferred charges
Loan costs, including debt arrangement fees, are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the relevant loan. The straight line basis of amortization approximates the effective interest method in the Company's consolidated statement of operations. Amortization of loan costs is included in interest expense.  If a loan is repaid early, any unamortized portion of the related deferred charges is charged against income in the period in which the loan is repaid.

Earnings(Loss) earnings per share
Earnings(Loss) earnings per share is based on the net (loss) income and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period presented. Diluted (loss) earnings per share is based on net (loss) income and the weighted average number of shares outstanding is adjusted to include the restricted stock units based on the treasury stock method.

Vessel impairmentImpairment of long-lived assets
The Company's vesselscarrying values of long-lived assets that are held and used by the Company and newbuildings under development are reviewed for potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a vesselan asset may notno longer be recoverable. This assessment is made at the individualSuch indicators may include depressed spot rates and depressed second hand vessel level as separately identifiable cash flow information for each vessel is available.values. The companyCompany assesses recoverability of the carrying value of the vesseleach asset or newbuilding on an individual basis by estimating the future netundiscounted cash flows expected to result from the vessel,asset, including any remaining construction costs for newbuildings, and eventual disposal. The carrying value of a time charter contract that was acquired with one of the vessels is included in the assessment. If the future net undiscounted cash flows are less thenthan the carrying value of the vessel,asset, or the current carrying value plus future newbuilding commitments, an impairment chargeloss is recognized based onrecorded equal to the difference between the asset's or newbuildings carrying value and fair value. In addition, long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less estimated costs to sell.

Fair value is typically established using an averageestimated based on values achieved for the sale/purchase of three independentsimilar vessels and appraised valuations. In addition, vessels to be disposed of by sale are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell.

Distributions to shareholders
Distributions to shareholders are applied first to retained earnings. When retained earnings are not sufficient, distributions are applied to the contributed capital surplus account.

Drydocking
Normal vessel repair and maintenance costs are expensed when incurred. The Company recognizes the cost of a drydocking at the time the drydocking takes place, that is, it applies the "expense as incurred" method.

Stock-based compensation
TheUp to December 31, 2012, the Company accountsaccounted for the restricted stock units ("RSUs") issued to the directors using theas equity methodclassified awards and amortizesamortized the fair value of the RSUs over the vesting period. The Company changed this method of accounting during 2013 due to actual settlements in cash of vested RSUs to date and now accounts for 50% of the RSUs issued to the directors as equity classified and a liability classification for the remaining 50% of the RSUs granted to the directors. This change did not have a significant impact on the results for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company accounts for the RSUs issued to the management companies usingas liability classified awards. The RSU expense has been recognized in the liabilityconsolidated statement of operations based on the straight-line method.

The fair value of an equity instrument issued to a nonemployee is measured by using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the date at which either (i) a commitment for performance by the counterparty has been reached; or (ii) the counterparty's performance is complete. This criterion is not considered to be met in the absence of considerable evidence, and liability accounting is applied with a re-measurement at each period end date. The Company has obtained a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, and the fair value of the equity instruments does not create equity until the future services are received (i.e. the instruments are not considered issued until they vest).

Merger-related costs
The Company accounts for merger-related costs as expenses in the periods in which the costs are incurred and the services are received.

Other comprehensive income
The Company has no other comprehensive income.

F-11




3.  NEWLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

ASU 2011-04, Fair Value MeasurementAccounting Standards Update No. 2014-08-Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement205) and Disclosure RequirementsProperty, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360). The amendments in U.S. GAAPthis Update address the issues that (i) too many disposals of small groups of assets that are recurring in nature qualify for discontinued operations presentation under Subtopic 205-20, and IFRSs. Many(ii) some of the changes here are clarificationsguidance on reporting discontinued operations results in higher costs for preparers because it can be complex and difficult to apply, by changing the criteria for reporting discontinued operations and enhancing convergence of existing guidance or wording changes to align with IFRS 13. The new measurement guidance did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statementsFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the new disclosureInternational Accounting Standard Board (IASB) reporting requirements arefor discontinued operations. The Company is required to apply the amendments in Note 16 "Financial Instruments".


F-10



ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwillthis Update prospectively to (i) all disposals (or classifications as held for Impairment. This ASU givessale) of components of an entity the option in itsthat occur within annual goodwill impairment test to first assess revised qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. There is no impact on the Company as a result of this guidance.

ASU 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. This ASU addresses implementation issues about the scope of ASU 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. ASU 2013-01 is effective for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. Its adoptionDecember 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years, and (ii) all businesses or non-profit activities that, on acquisition, are classified as held for sale that occur within annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years. The Company is not expected to have a materialcurrently considering the impact of these amendments on the Company's disclosures.its consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2013-02, Comprehensive IncomeAccounting Standards Update No. 2014-09-Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This ASU seeks606). The FASB and the IASB initiated a joint project to improveclarify the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. An entity is requiredprinciples for recognizing revenue and to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required underdevelop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP to be reclassifiedand IFRS. To meet those objectives, the FASB is amending the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in its entirety to net income. For other amounts thatthis Update are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income ineffective for the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The requirement of this update is to ensure that this information is presented in one place, rather than in different places throughout the financial statements as it is currently. The guidance is effective prospectivelyCompany for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. This guidance does2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not expectedpermitted. The Company is currently considering the impact of these amendments on its consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15-Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40). The amendments in this Update provide guidance in U.S. GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures and are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently considering the impact of these amendments on its consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02-Consolidation (Topic 810). The amendments in this Update affect reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments (i) modify the evaluation of whether limited partnerships and similar legal entities are variable interest entities (VIEs) or voting interest entities, (ii) eliminate the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership, (iii) affect the consolidation analysis of reporting entities that are involved with VIEs, particularly those that have fee arrangements and related party relationships, and (iv) provide a materialscope exception from consolidation guidance for reporting entities with interests in certain legal entities. The amendments in this Update are effective for the Company for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company is currently considering the impact of these amendments on its consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03 Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) Simplifying the Company'sPresentation of Debt Issuance Costs. This Update was issued as part of an initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards (the Simplification Initiative). The objective of the Simplification Initiative is to identify, evaluate, and improve areas of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for which cost and complexity can be reduced while maintaining or improving the usefulness of the information provided to users of financial statements. To simplify presentation of debt issuance costs, the amendments in this Update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this Update. The amendments in this Update will affect us for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently considering the impact of these amendments on our consolidated financial statements.

4.   TAXATION

The Company is incorporated in Bermuda. Under current Bermuda law, the Company is not required to pay taxes in Bermuda on either income or capital gains. The Company has received written assurance from the Minister of Finance in Bermuda that, in the event of any such taxes being imposed, the Company will be exempted from taxation until March 31, 2035. Based upon review of applicable laws and regulations, and after consultation with counsel, the Company does not believe it is subject to material income taxes in any jurisdiction.

5. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS


The Company has determined that an individual vessel within a vessel class is not a component as defined by the accounting standard for the purpose of discontinued operations as the Company does not believe that the operations of an individual vessel within a vessel class can be clearly distinguished. Generally, the Company believes that all of the vessels in a vessel class represent a component as defined for the purpose of discontinued operations and has presented the operations of the VLCCs as discontinued operations since three of those vessels were sold during 2012 and the remaining VLCC meets the criteria for held for sale at December 31, 2012.
F-12



In August 2012, the VLCC Hampstead was contracted to be sold to an unrelated third party, but the sale was not completed due to the buyer's default, and wedefault. The Company retained the deposit received in the amount of $2.432.4 million. In September 2012, the Company sold the VLCC Hampstead for net proceeds of $22.2 million and recorded a loss on sale of $12.7 million (including the deposit received). In October 2012, the Company sold the VLCC Titan Venus for net proceeds of $19.8 million. The Company recorded an impairment loss of $14.7 million in the third quarter of 2012 with respect to this vessel and there was no gain or loss on its sale. In December 2012, the Company sold the VLCC Kensington for net proceeds of $22.5 million. The Company recorded an impairment loss of $13.5 million in the third quarter of 2012 with respect to this vessel and there was a loss on sale of $0.4 million. The Company recorded an impairment loss of $13.4 million in the third quarter of 2012 with respect to the VLCC Mayfair. This vessel iswas classified as held for sale at December 31, 2012.

In April 2013, the Company sold the VLCC Mayfair for scrap for net proceeds of $16.9 million. The Company recorded an impairment loss of $5.3 million in the first quarter of 2013 with respect to this vessel and there was no gain or loss on its sale. The Company recorded a gain of $0.2 million in 2013 from the sale of equipment for cash proceeds of $0.2 million.

Net loss from discontinued operations in the year ended December 31, 2014, comprises primarily of legal fees incurred in connection with claims for unpaid charter hire and damages following early termination of charters.

Amounts recorded inwith respect ofto discontinued operations in each of the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010, respectively,2012 are as follows;

F-11



(in thousands of $) 2012
 2011
 2010
Carrying value of vessels disposed of in 2012 107,027
 113,527
 122,301
Carrying value of vessel held for sale at December 31, 2012 21,523
 37,804
 40,710
       
Per Statement of Operations;      
Operating revenues 24,513
 39,020
 55,072
Net loss on sale of vessels (13,088) 
 
Impairment loss on vessels (41,597) 
 
Net (loss) income (59,311) 5,594
 18,412

The impairment loss of $41.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2012 relates to three VLCCs (see Note 8).The net loss on sale of vessels of $13.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily relates to one VLCC, which was not impaired.
(in thousands of $) 2014
 2013
 2012
Carrying value of vessels disposed of in 2012 
 
 107,027
Carrying value of vessel held for sale at December 31, 2012 
 
 21,523
Per Statement of Operations;      
Operating revenues 
 (226) 24,513
Net gain (loss) on sale of assets 
 254
 (13,088)
Impairment loss on vessels 
 (5,342) (41,597)
Net loss (258) (7,433) (59,311)

6.   SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company and the chief operating decision maker ("CODM") measure performance based on the Company's overall return to shareholders based on consolidated net income. The CODM does not review a measure of operating result at a lower level than the consolidated group and the Company has only one reportable segment.
 
The Company's vessels operate worldwide and therefore management does not evaluate performance by geographical region as this information is not meaningful. The Company has operated in two markets from 2009 through 2012; the tanker and dry bulk carrier markets as an international provider of seaborne transportation of crude oil and dry bulk cargoes. Following the sale of threethe VLCCs during 2012 and the balance sheet classification of the fourth as 'held for sale', at December 31, 2012, the results of the four VLCCs, which operated in the tanker market, have been recorded as discontinued operations. An analysis of revenues from continuing operations is as follows:
(in thousands of $) 2012
 2011
 2010
 2014
 2013
 2012
Total operating revenues – dry bulk carrier market 37,315
 55,497
 40,825
 96,715
 37,546
 37,315

Revenues from three customers in the year ended December 31, 20122014 each accounted for 10 percent or more of the Company's consolidated revenues from discontinued and continuing operations, in the amount of $17.48.2 million, $11.68.0 million, and $5.17.9 million, respectively. Revenues from sixthree customers in the year ended December 31, 20112013 each accounted for 10 percent or more of the Company's consolidated revenues from discontinued and continuing operations, in the amount of $19.217.0 million, $16.1 million, $14.7 million, $11.6 million, $11.65.0 million and $10.0$4.3 million,, respectively. Revenues from three customers in the year ended December 31, 20102012 each accounted for 10 percent or more of the Company's consolidation revenues from discontinued and continuing operations, in the amount of $28.017.4 million, $19.111.6 million and $14.6$5.1 million,, respectively.

7.   EARNINGS PER SHARE


F-13



The computation of basic earnings per share is based on net income and the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. The computation of diluted earnings per share is based on net income and the weighted average number of shares outstanding to include the restricted stock units based on the treasury stock method.

The components of the numerator for the calculation of basic EPS and diluted EPS for net income from continuing operations, net (loss) incomeloss from discontinued operations and net income (loss) income are as follows:
(in thousands of $) 2012
 2011
 2010
 2014
 2013
 2012
Net income from continuing operations 5,882
 27,058
 20,145
 16,253
 3,530
 5,882
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations (59,311) 5,594
 18,412
Net (loss) income (53,429) 32,652
 38,557
Net loss from discontinued operations (258) (7,433) (59,311)
Net income (loss) 15,995
 (3,903) (53,429)

The components of the denominator for the calculation of basic EPS and diluted EPS are as follows:

F-12



(in thousands) 2012
 2011
 2010
 2014
 2013
 2012
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic 24,432
 24,426
 19,120
 52,445
 25,620
 24,432
Impact of restricted stock units 133
 152
 
 149
 176
 133
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - diluted 24,565
 24,578
 19,120
 52,594
 25,796
 24,565

8. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG TERM ASSETS

The Company recorded impairment losses on vessels of $41.6nil, $5.3 million, nil and nil for$41.6 million in the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 20102012, respectively. The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of each of its vessels may not be recoverable.

During the thirdfirst quarter of 2013, one VLCC, which was classified in the balance sheet as held for sale at December 31, 2012 three VLCCs wereand had been recorded at its estimated fair value less costs to sell based on its sale as a trading vessel, was identified as being impaired as it was believed that the undiscounted future cash flowsvessel would have to be sold at a lower value for each vessel were less thanscrap. The loss recorded was equal to the difference between the carrying value and therefore, non recoverable.estimated fair value based on a sale for scrap less costs to sell. The impairment loss in 2013 is included in discontinued operations.

During the third quarter of 2012, three VLCCs were identified as being impaired. The loss recorded is equal to the difference between the carrying value and estimated fair value of the vessels. Two of the vessels were sold during the fourth quarter of 2012 and the remaining vessel iswas classified as held for sale at December 31, 2012. The impairment loss in 2012 is included in discontinued operations.

9.   LEASES

The minimum future revenues to be receivedNo vessels were on a fixed rate time charter at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013: one). Three vessels were on index linked time charters, which arewere accounted for as operating leases as of December 31, 2012 are as follows. These minimum future revenues exclude payments that are based on market rates and indices.
(in thousands of $)  
Year ending December 31,  
2013 20,742
2014 11,185
2015 
2016 
2017 
Thereafter 
  31,927
2014 (December 31, 2013: two).
 
As of December 31, 2012, four of the Company's vessels were leased out to third parties on time charters for remaining periods ranging from less than one year to two years and are classed as operating leases.

The cost and accumulated depreciation of vessels leased to third parties at December 31, 20122014 were $305.6$222.9 million and $31.8$38.0 million,, respectively, and at December 31, 20112013 were $569.9$216.9 million and $171.5$28.6 million,, respectively.

10.   TRADE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET

Trade accounts receivable are stated net of a provision for doubtful accounts. Movements in the provision for doubtful accounts in the three years ended December 31, 20122014 maybe summarized as follows;

F-14



(in thousands of $) Provision for doubtful accounts
Balance at December 31, 2009226
Additions charged to income
Deductions credited to income
Balance at December 31, 2010226
Additions charged to income1,700
Deductions credited to income
Balance at December 31, 2011 1,926
Additions charged to income 10,634
Deductions credited to income (479)
Balance at December 31, 2012 12,081
Additions charged to income226
Deductions credited to income(2,990)
Balance at December 31, 20139,317
Deductions credited to income(1,883)
Balance at December 31, 20147,434

F-13




The provision for doubtful accounts at December 31, 20122014 of $12.1$7.4 million primarily relates to three chartererstwo VLCC charters, which were terminated in 2012.

In March, June, October and allDecember 2014, the Company received $9.7 million, $3.2 million, $3.3 million and $3.1 million, respectively, as full settlement of claims for unpaid charter hire and damages for Golden Zhejiang. $1.9 million of the amount received in March 2014 related charters were terminated during 2012. $7.2 millionto unrecognized time charter revenue in respect of services previously rendered and the corresponding provision for doubtful accounts was credited income. The balance of the provision relates toamount received in March and the VLCCs, which areremaining amounts were recorded as discontinued operations,other operating income.

In December 2013, the Company received $756,000 from Sanko Steamship Co. Ltd., or Sanko, as a partial settlement for a $17 million claim for unpaid charter hire and $4.9 millionclaims of the Battersea. This amount was recorded as time charter income in the fourth quarter of 2013. Trade accounts receivable of $3.0 million and a provision relates tofor doubtful accounts in the Capesize vessels. Refer also to Note 23.same amount were written off.

11.   VESSELS
(in thousands of $) Cost
 Accumulated Depreciation
 Net Book Value
Balance at December 31, 2009 523,689
 (179,291) 344,398
Purchase of vessels 134,201
 
  
Depreciation 
 (19,567)  
Balance at December 31, 2010 657,890
 (198,858) 459,032
Depreciation 
 (22,759)  
Balance at December 31, 2011 657,890
 (221,617) 436,273
Transfer to Vessel to held for sale (74,455) 52,932
  
Disposal of vessels (236,257) 157,415
  
Impairment loss (41,597) 
  
Depreciation 
 (20,485)  
Balance at December 31, 2012 305,581
 (31,755) 273,826

In 2010, the Company purchased two 2010-built Capesize dry bulk carriers with existing time charters at a cost of $134.2 million, excluding the value of the time charters.
(in thousands of $) Cost
 Accumulated Depreciation
 Net Book Value
Balance at December 31, 2011 657,890
 (221,617) 436,273
Transfer to vessel held for sale (74,455) 52,932
  
Impairment loss (41,597) 
  
Disposal of vessels (236,257) 157,415
  
Depreciation 
 (20,485)  
Balance at December 31, 2012 305,581
 (31,755) 273,826
Depreciation 
 (11,079)  
Balance at December 31, 2013 305,581
 (42,834) 262,747
Purchase of vessels 24,085
 
  
Value of share consideration paid in connection with purchase of vessel 38,874
    
Transfer from newbuildings 546,520
 
  
Depreciation 
 (19,561)  
Balance at December 31, 2014 915,060
 (62,395) 852,665

In August 2012, the VLCC Hampstead was contracted to be sold to an unrelated third party, but the sale was not completed due to the buyer's default, and we retained the deposit received in the amount of $2.432.4 million. In September 2012, the Company sold the VLCC Hampstead for net proceeds of $22.2 million and recorded a loss on sale of $12.7 million (including the deposit received). In October 2012, the Company sold the VLCC Titan Venus for net proceeds of $19.8 million. The Company recorded an impairment loss of $14.7 million in the third quarter of 2012 with respect to this vessel and there was no gain or loss on its sale. In December 2012, the Company sold the VLCC Kensington for net proceeds of $22.5 million. The Company recorded an impairment loss of $13.5 million in the third quarter of 2012 with respect to this vessel and there was a loss on sale of $0.4 million. The Company recorded an impairment loss of $13.4 million in the third quarter of 2012 with respect to the VLCC Mayfair.Mayfair. This vessel iswas classified as held for sale at December 31, 2012.


F-15



At December 31, 2012,2014, the Company owned fourthirteen Capesize vessels (2013: four).

In April 2014, a subsidiary of the Company acquired a 2013-built Capesize dry bulk carrier, Bulk China (renamed KSL China), from Karpasia. The consideration consisted of the issuance of 3.1 million shares, which were recorded at a price of $12.54 per share or $38.9 million in aggregate, and a cash payment of $24.0 million.

The Company took delivery in the second quarter of 2014 of three of the five Capesize newbuildings purchased from Frontline 2012 in April 2014. KSL Seattle and oneKSL Singapore VLCC, which were delivered in May 2014 and KSL Sapporo was classified as Vessel held for sale.delivered in June 2014. During the third quarter of 2014, the remaining two Capesize newbuildings were delivered. KSL Sydney was delivered in July 2014 and KSL Salvador was delivered in September 2014.

In April 2014, the Company agreed to acquire 25 SPCs, each owning a fuel efficient dry bulk newbuilding, from Frontline 2012. Thirteen of these SPC's were acquired in September 2014 and three of the newbuildings were subsequently delivered to the Company in 2014. KSL Santiago was delivered in September 2014 and KSL San Francisco and KSL Santos were delivered in October 2014.

Total depreciation expense was $19.6 million, $20.5 million, $22.811.1 million and $19.6$20.5 million in the years ended December 31, 20122014, 20112013 and 20102012, respectively. These amounts include depreciation for the VLCCs of $9.4 millionnil , $11.7 millionnil and $11.79.4 million in the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 2010,2012, respectively, which are recorded in discontinued operations.

12.VESSEL HELD FOR SALE NEWBUILDINGS

The carrying value of newbuildings relates to the fourteen Capesize dry bulk vessels, which the Company has under construction at December 31, 2014 (out of a total of 26 newbuildings) and represents the accumulated costs which the Company has paid by way of purchase installments and other capitalized expenditures together with capitalized interest. Movements in the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 maybe summarized as follows:
(in thousands of $)
Balance at December 31, 2012
Installments and newbuilding supervision fees paid and accrued26,298
Interest capitalized408
Balance at December 31, 201326,706
Installments and newbuilding supervision fees paid and accrued356,355
Value of share consideration paid in connection with purchase of SPCs, net of cash acquired;
   - in April 2014150,959
   - in September 2014331,661
Interest capitalized4,179
Transfers to vessels(546,520)
Balance at December 31, 2014323,340

In April 2014, the Company acquired five SPCs from Frontline 2012, each owning a fuel efficient 180,000 dwt Capesize dry bulk newbuilding. The consideration consisted of the issuance of 15.5 million shares, which were recorded at a price per share of $12.54 or $194.4 million in aggregate, and $150.0 million was assumed in remaining newbuilding installments. Cash of $43.4 million was acquired with the SPCs and so $151.0 million of the consideration was allocated to the cost of the newbuilding contracts. Two of the five Capesize newbuildings were delivered to the Company in May 2014 and the remaining three were delivered in June, July and September 2014.

In April 2014, the Company also agreed to acquire 25 SPCs, each owning a fuel efficient dry bulk newbuilding, from Frontline 2012. Thirteen of these SPC's were acquired in September 2014. The balanceconsideration consisted of the issuance of 31.0 million shares, which were recorded at a price per share of $11.51 or $356.8 million in aggregate, and $490.0 million was assumed in remaining newbuilding installments. Cash of $25.1 million was acquired with the SPCs and so $331.7 million of the consideration was allocated to the cost of the newbuilding contracts. Three of the thirteen newbuildings were subsequently delivered to the Company in 2014. KSL Santiago was delivered in September 2014 and KSL San Francisco and KSL Santos were delivered in October 2014. The Company acquired the remaining 12 SPCs in March 2015 and issued 31.0 million shares as consideration (see Note 24).


F-16



In the year ended December 31, 2012 represents2014, the VLCC Mayfair.difference between (i) the aggregate of installments and newbuilding supervision fees paid and accrued and interest capitalized of $360.5 million, and (ii) additions to newbuildings per the consolidated statement of cash flows of $357.4 million is attributable to accrued expenses not paid of $3.1 million.

13.   DEFERRED CHARGES
(in thousands of $) 2012
 2011
 2014
 2013
Capitalized financing fees and expenses 3,405
 3,414
 6,253
 2,699
Accumulated amortization (2,183) (1,304) (2,720) (2,035)
 1,222
 2,110
 3,533
 664

During 2014, a commitment fee of $3.4 million was paid and capitalized in connection with the $420.0 million term loan facility that was entered into in June 2014. During 2013, fully amortized deferred charges of $0.7 million were removed from cost and accumulated amortization.

During the years ended December 31,2014, 2013 and 2012, 2011 and 2010, $0.3 millionnil, $0.0$0.1 million and $0.0$0.3 million, respectively, waswere charged against income as a result of early loan repayments.

14.   OTHER LONG TERM ASSETS


F-14



The balance at December 31, 2011, represents the unamortized portion of the time charter taken over upon the acquisition of the Golden Zhejiang, which was being amortized over the period of the time charter on a straight line basis. This balance was charged against income in the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of the termination of the charter in July 2012.

15.ACCRUED EXPENSES
(in thousands of $) 2012
 2011
 2014
 2013
Voyage expenses 117
 2,315
 871
 354
Ship operating expenses 1,090
 1,329
 1,112
 489
Administrative expenses 981
 295
 1,162
 1,332
Interest expense 313
 575
 1,045
 189
 2,501
 4,514
 4,190
 2,364

16.15.   DEFERRED CHARTER REVENUE

In March 2012, the Company agreed an amendment to the time charter for the Capesize vessel Belgravia whereby $5.0 million was paid in advance by the charterer and $95,000 was to be deducted by the charterer from each future hire payment, which are each payable 15 days in advance, until $5.7 million was deducted in total. The Company accounted for this by calculating the total expected charter hire payments at the date of change and recording this expected revenue over the remaining term of the charter party to August 2014 on a straight line basis. The $5.0 million prepayment was recorded as a liability and is being amortized over the remaining term of the charter party on a straight line basis. As of December 31, 2012,2014, $2.0 millionnil (2011:(2013: nil$1.3 million) and $1.3 millionnil (2011:(2013: nil) are recorded in short term and long term liabilities, respectively, inwith respect ofto the unamortized balance of the $5.0 million prepayment. As of December 31, 2012,2014, $1.03.3 million (2011:(2013:$0.72.3 million) is recorded in short term liabilities in respect of income received in advance on other charters.

17.16.   DEBT
 
(in thousands of $) 2012
 2011
 2014
 2013
U.S. dollar denominated floating rate debt:        
-$58.24 Million Loan 12,392
 53,740
-$175 Million Loan 99,286
 100,000
$175 Million Loan 125,000
 95,000
$420 Million Loan 238,500
 
Total debt 111,678
 153,740
 363,500
 95,000
Less: current portion (4,700) (3,600) (19,812) 
 106,978
 150,140
 343,688
 95,000

The average interest rate for the floating rate debt was 2.93% for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2.76% for the year ended December 31, 2011.

$14058.24 Million Loan
In March 2004, the Company refinanced a prior debt facility with a $140.0 million credit facility in the form of five tranches of $28.0 million, each in respect of a VLCC in the fleet at the time (including all VLCC vessels in the current fleet). one tranche was repaid upon the sale of the related vessel in 2007. The credit facility was secured by, among other things, a mortgage on each VLCC and an assignment of any charter in respect of that VLCC. The facility was repayable over seven years. The credit facility bore interest at LIBOR plus a margin was repaid in full in July 2010.

$60 Million Loan
In August 2009, the Company entered into a four year term loan facility agreement consisting of two tranches of $30.0 million each. In August 2009, the Company drew down $30.0 million and in October 2009, the Company drew down the second tranche of $30.0 million. The loans were secured by, among other things, a mortgage on two Capesize vessels and an assignment of any charters in respect to those vessels. The $60 Million Loan bore interest at LIBOR plus a margin and was repaid in in full December 2010.

$105 Million Loan ($60 Million Loan extension)
In July 2010, the $60 million Loan was increased and extended to $105 million. The Company drew down $47.5 million and the $105 million facility was repaid in full in December 2010.


F-15



$58.24 Million Loan
In July 2010, the Company entered into a $58.24 million credit facility consisting of four tranches of $14.56 million each in respect of each VLCC in the fleet.fleet at that time. Repayments arewere made on a quarterly basis with a balloon payment at the final maturity date in June 2015. As of December 31, 2012, the outstanding balance was $12.4 million as a result of loan repayments of $41.3 million due to the sale of three VLCCs. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin. The loan is secured by, among other things, a first priority mortgage onAs of December 31, 2014, the applicable vessel. The remaining outstanding balance on this facility has been repaid inwas nil (December 31, 2013: nil) as a result of loan repayments of $41.3 million due to the second quartersale of three VLCCs during 2012 and a final repayment of $12.4 million during 2013 upon the sale of the VLCC Mayfair.

F-17




$175 Million Loan
In December 2010, the Company refinanced the $105 million loan facility and entered into a $175 million credit facility consisting of four tranches of $25.0 million, each in respect of eachrelating to a Capesize vessel, and a revolving debt facility of $75 million. The loan is repayable in May 2015. As of December 31, 2012, the outstanding balance was $99.3 million. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin. The revolving debt facility of $75 million was available for vessel acquisitions but undrawn at December 31, 2012. The loan is secured by, among other things, a first priority mortgage on the applicable vessel. The loan has an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.50%. In May 2013, the revolving debt facility of $75.0 million was reduced to $40.0 million. In May 2014, the repayment profile of the $135 million term loan facility was changed from a balloon repayment of the full amount in May 2015 to four quarterly installments commencing in May 2015, each equal to 1/48 of the outstanding loan amount, and a balloon payment for the remaining balance in May 2016. During 2014, $30.0 million was drawn down from this facility to part finance the 2013-built Capesize bulk carrier, Bulk China (renamed KSL China), purchased from Karpasia in April 2014 with a similar repayment profile to that agreed in May 2014. As of December 31, 2014, the outstanding balance was $125.0 million and $10.0 million was available for vessel acquisitions but undrawn.

$420 Million Loan
In June 2014, the Company entered into a term loan facility of up to $420.0 million, depending on the market values of the vessels at the time of draw down, consisting of fourteen tranches of $30.0 million to finance, in part, fourteen of the Company's newbuildings. Each tranche is repayable by quarterly installments of $$375,000 and all amounts outstanding shall be repaid on the final maturity date, which will be no later than 72 months after the first drawdown date or June 2020. The final draw down date must be no later than October 2016. The loan has an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.50%. The Company drew down six tranches of $30.0 million each in the third quarter of 2014 as part financing of the KSL Seattle, KSL Sapporo, KSL Sydney, KSL Singapore, KSL Salvador and KSL Santiago anddrew down two tranches of $30.0 million each in the fourth quarter of 2014 as part financing of the KSL San Francisco and KSL Santos. Also in the fourth quarter, the Company paid four installments of $375,000 each. As of December 31, 2014, $238.5 million had been drawn under the facility and the available, undrawn amount was $180.0 million.

TheAs of December 31, 2014, both of the Company's loan agreements contain a loan-to-value clauses,clause, which could require the Company at its option, to post additional collateral or prepay a portion of the outstanding borrowings should the value of the vessels securing borrowings under each of such agreements decrease below a required levels.level. In addition, the loan agreements includecontains certain financial covenants, including the requirement to maintain a certain level of free cash, positive working capital and failurea value adjusted equity covenant. The loans also include cross default provisions. Failure to comply with any of the covenants in the loan agreements could result in a default, under those agreements and under other agreements containing cross-default provisions. The Company was in compliance with allwhich would permit the lender to accelerate the maturity of the financialdebt and to foreclose upon any collateral securing the debt. Under those circumstances, the Company might not have sufficient funds or other covenants contained in the Company's loan agreements as of December 31, 2012.resources to satisfy its obligations.

In addition, pursuant to the Company's $58.24 million and $175 million credit facilities, none of its vessel owning subsidiaries may sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of their interests in the vessels they own without the prior written consent of the applicable lenders unless, in the case of a vessel sale, the outstanding borrowings under the credit facility applicable to that vessel are repaid in full.

The Company was in compliance with all of the financial and other covenants contained in its loan agreements as of December 31, 2014.

The outstanding debt as of December 31, 20122014 is repayable as follows:
(in thousands of $)    
Year ending December 31,      
2013 4,700
2014 890
2015 106,088
 19,812
2016 
 129,188
2017 
 
 12,000
2018 12,000
2019 12,000
Thereafter 
 178,500
 111,678
 
 363,500

Assets pledged

As of December 31, 2014, thirteen vessels (2013: four vessels) with an aggregate carrying value of $852.7 million (2013: 262.7 million) were pledged as security for the Company's floating rate debt.


F-18

18.


17.  SHARE CAPITAL
Authorized share capital:        
(in thousands of $ except per share amount) 2012
 2011
 2014
 2013
50 million common shares of $0.01 each 500
 500
200 million common shares of $0.01 par value (2013: 50 million common shares) 2,000
 500

Issued and fully paid share capital:        
(in thousands of $ except per share amount) 2012
 2011
 2014
 2013
24,437,000 common shares of $0.01 par value (2011: 24,425,699 shares) 244
 244
80,121,550 common shares of $0.01 par value (2013: 30,472,061 common shares) 801
 305

The Company's common shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the Oslo Stock Exchange.

In May 2012, 11,301 common shares were issued as partial settlement of the first tranche of the RSUs granted in December 2010, which vested2010.

In January 2013, 35,061 common shares were issued as partial settlement of the first and second tranche of RSUs granted in December 2011.2012 and December 2011, respectively.

In October 2013, 6,000,000 common shares were issued at $9.00 per share through a public offering and net proceeds of $51.2 million were received.

In February 2014, 49,489 common shares were issued as settlement of the third, second and first tranches of the RSUs granted in December 2010, December 2011 and January 2013, respectively.

In April 2014, 15,500,000 and 3,100,000 common shares were issued to Frontline 2012 and Hemen (on behalf of Karpasia), respectively, in connection with the acquisition of five Capesize dry bulk newbuildings and one 2013-built Capesize dry bulk carrier, Bulk China (renamed KSL China). These shares were recorded at a price of $12.54 per share being the closing share price on the date of issuance.

In September 2014, 31,000,000 common shares were issued to Frontline 2012 in connection with the acquisition of thirteen Capesize dry bulk newbuildings. These shares were recorded at a price of $11.51 per share being the closing share price on the date of issuance.

In June 2014, at a special general meeting of the shareholders, the Company's authorized share capital was increased from $500,000 divided into 50,000,000 common shares of $0.01 par value to $2,000,000 divided into 200,000,000 common shares of $0.01 par value.

19.18.   RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS


F-16



In September 2010, the Board of Directors (the "Board") approved the adoption of anthe 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") and reserved 800,000 common shares of the Company for issuance pursuant to the Plan. The Plan permits RSUs to be granted to directors, officers, employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, affiliates, consultants and service providers. The RSUs will vest over 3three years at a rate of 1/3 of the number of RSUs granted on each annual anniversary of the date of grant, subject to the participant continuing to provide services to the Company from the grant date through the applicable vesting date.

Payment upon vesting of RSUs may be in cash, in shares of common stock or a combination of both as determined by the Board of Directors.Board. They must be valued in an amount equal to the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of vesting. The participant shall receive a 'cash distribution equivalent right' with respect to each RSU entitling the participant to receive amounts equal to the ordinary dividends that would be paid during the time the RSU is outstanding and unvested on the shares of common stock underlying the RSU as if such shares were outstanding from the date of grant through the applicable vesting date of the RSU. Such payments shall be paid to the participant at the same time at which the RSUs vesting event occurs, conditioned upon the occurrence of the vesting event.


F-19



The following table summarizes restricted stock unit transactions in the years ended December 31, 20122014, 20112013 and 2010:2012: 
 Number of units  Number of units 
 Directors
 Management companies
 Total
 Fair value Directors
 Management companies
 Total
 Fair value
Granted 29,571
 29,572
 59,143
 $22.23
Units outstanding as of December 31, 2010 29,571
 29,572
 59,143
 $22.27
Granted 46,593
 46,596
 93,189
 $13.95
Units outstanding as of December 31, 2011 76,164
 76,168
 152,332
 $13.67 76,164
 76,168
 152,332
 $13.67
Settled (9,857) (9,857) (19,714) $13.63 (9,857) (9,857) (19,714) $13.63
Units outstanding as of December 31, 2012 66,307
 66,311
 132,618
 $5.25 66,307
 66,311
 132,618
 $5.25
Granted 47,238
 47,238
 94,476
 $6.74
Settled (25,388) (25,388) (50,776) $9.65
Units outstanding as of December 31, 2013 88,157
 88,161
 176,318
 $9.19
Granted 27,555
 27,556
 55,111
 $9.48
Settled (41,134) (41,136) (82,270) $9.32
Units outstanding as of December 31, 2014 74,578
 74,581
 149,159
 $4.53

The fair values in the table above are the closing share prices on December 31, the share prices on the date of grant or the share prices on the date of vesting, as appropriate. The RSU expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112014, 2013 and 20102012 was $10.2 million, $0.20.9 million and $0.00.9 million respectively.

In May 2012, the Company issued 11,301 common shares and paid $159,763 to members of the Board of Directors and to the General Manager and the Dry bulkBulk Manager in settlement of the first tranche of the RSUs granted in December 2010, which vested on in December 29, 2011.2011.

In January 2013, the Company issued 35,061 common shares and paid $181,610$181,610 to members of the Board of Directors and to the General MangerManager and the Dry Bulk Manager in settlement of the first and second tranches of the RSUs granted in December 2011 and December 2010, respectively, thatwhich vested onin December 29, 2012. These settlements represent 50%of the value in common shares and 50% of the value in cash for each of the directors and each of the two management companies.

OnIn January 24, 2013, the Board of Directors granted a total of 94,476 RSUs pursuant to the 2010 Equity Plan to members of the Board and the two management companies. These RSUs will vest over 3 years at a rate of 1/3 of the number of RSUs granted on each anniversary of the date of grant.

In February 2014, the Company issued 49,489 commons shares and paid $464,630 to members of the Board and to the General and the Dry Bulk Manager in settlement of the first, second and third tranches of the RSU's granted in January 2013, December 2011 and December 2010, respectively, which vested in January 2014 and December 2013, respectively. These settlements representsrepresent 50% of the value in common shares and 50% of the value in cash for each of the directors and each of the two management companies.

In January 2014, the Board granted a total of 55,111 RSUs pursuant to the 2010 Equity Plan to members of the Board and the two management companies. These RSU's will vest over three years at a rate of 1/3 of the number of RSUs granted on each anniversary of the date of grant.
 
20.19.   FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Interest rate risk management
In certain situations, the Company may enter into financial instruments to reduce the risk associated with fluctuations in interest rates. The Company does not hold or issue instruments for speculative or trading purposes. As at December 31, 20122014, the Company is not party to any interest rate swaps to hedge interest rate exposure.

Foreign currency risk
The majority of the Company's transactions, assets and liabilities are denominated in United States dollars, the functional currency of the Company. There is no significant risk that currency fluctuations will have a negative effect of the value of the Company's cash flows.

Fair values

F-17F-20



Fair values
The carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company's financial instruments at December 31, 20122014 and 20112013 are as follows:
 2012
 2012
 2011
 2011
 2014
 2014
 2013
 2013
(in thousands of $)
 
Fair
Value

 
Carrying
Value

 
Fair
Value

 
Carrying
 Value

 
Fair
Value

 
Carrying
Value

 
Fair
Value

 
Carrying
 Value

Cash and cash equivalents 79,259
 79,259
 46,848
 46,848
 42,221
 42,221
 98,250
 98,250
Restricted cash 15,000
 15,000
 15,000
 15,000
 18,923
 18,923
 15,000
 15,000
Floating rate debt 111,678
 111,678
 153,740
 153,740
 363,500
 363,500
 95,000
 95,000

The carrying valuefair values of cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash, is a reasonable estimate of fair value.have been determined using level 1 inputs and are assumed to be their carrying values.

The estimated fair value forof floating rate long-term debt has been determined using level 2 inputs and is considered to be equal to the carrying value since it bears variable interest rates, which are reset on a quarterly basis.
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The Company recorded an impairment loss of $41.6 million in 2012 in respect of three VLCCs. Two of these vessels were sold during 2012 and the third was classified as 'held for sale' at December 31, 2012. This vessel was measured at an estimated fair value of $21.5 million at December 31, 2012, which was determined using level two inputs being the average of three broker values for a vessel of a similar age and type to be sold as a trading vessel less estimated selling costs. The sale of this vessel as a trading vessel was considered the principal market as of December 31, 2012.

Concentrations of risk
There is a concentration of credit risk with respect to cash and cash equivalents to the extent that substantially all of the amounts are carried with Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken, DnB and Nordea Bank Norge ASA. The Company does not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to credit risk.

21.20.   RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In JulyWe transact business with the following related parties, being companies in which Hemen and October 2010, the Company purchased two 2010-built Capesize dry bulk carriers, Golden Futurecompanies associated with Hemen have a significant interest: Frontline Ltd. and Golden Zhejiang, from Golden Ocean. Golden Future was purchased for $47.0 million in cash and 1,464,515 shares with a value of $25.0 million. Golden Zhejiang was purchased for $47.0 million in cash and 973,684 shares with a value of $18.5 million. Both vessels were acquired with an existing time charter and $3.3 million of the purchase price for the Golden Zhejiang has been attributed to the value of the time charter.
Management fees, which represent a commission of 1.25% of gross freight earned by the dry bulk carriers, of $0.5 million were invoiced by Golden Ocean and paid by the Company during each of 2011 and 2010. As of December 31, 2011, $0.3 million was payable to Golden Ocean. At December 31, 2010, $69,000 was due from Golden Ocean. On December 22, 2011 and December 29, 2010, 23,298 and 14,786 RSUs, respectively, were issued to Golden Oceanits subsidiaries (Frontline Management (Bermuda) Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Golden Ocean.Ltd, ICB Shipping (Bermuda) Ltd and Seateam Management Pte Ltd), Karpasia Inc. and Frontline 2012 Ltd.

In March 2012, the Former Golden Ocean sold its entire holding of shares in the Company and Golden Ocean iswas no longer considered to be a related party. The Former Golden Ocean was considered a related party from September 2014 when Knightsbridge became a majority-owned subsidiary of Frontline 2012 following the acquisition of thirteen SPCs from Frontline 2012 (see below).

Frontline 2012 Transactions

22.In April 2014, the Company acquired five SPCs from Frontline 2012, each owning a fuel efficient 180,000 dwt Capesize dry bulk newbuilding and a subsidiary of the Company acquired a 2013-built Capesize dry bulk carrier, MANAGEMENT OF COMPANYBulk China (renamed KSL China), from Karpasia. The consideration was settled by the issuance of 15.5 million shares and 3.1 million shares to Frontline 2012 and Hemen (on behalf of Karpasia), respectively, which were recorded at a price of $12.54 per share, $150.0 million was assumed in remaining newbuilding installments in connection with the SPC's acquired from Frontline 2012 and $24.0 million was paid in cash to Karpasia. Cash of $43.4 million was acquired on the purchase of the five SPC's. No other working capital balances were acquired.

On February 12, 1997,In April 2014, the Company entered intoagreed to acquire 25 SPCs from Frontline 2012, each owning a fuel efficient dry bulk newbuilding. In September 2014, the Company acquired 13 of these SPCs. The consideration for the 13 SPCs was settled by the issuance of 31.0 million shares. The issuance of the 31.0 million shares was recorded at an aggregate value of $356.8 million based on the closing price of $11.51 per share on September 15, the closing date of the transaction. $490.0 million was assumed in remaining newbuilding installments and cash of $25.1 million was acquired on the purchase of the thirteen SPCs. The Company acquired the remaining twelve SPCs in March 2015 and issued 31.0 million shares as consideration.

Management Agreements

The Knightsbridge Board decided to contract for the day-to-day management agreement withservices of Knightsbridge and its subsidiaries, rather than to establish a proprietary management organization. This policy was based on the General Manager underavailability of such services in the market on terms which were considered more cost efficient to us than the General Manager provided certain administrative,alternative. All of the management services contracted for by Knightsbridge and advisory servicesits subsidiaries were subject to the Company for an amountboard or, as the case may be, the board of $750,000 per year.the relevant subsidiary's, sole right to determine the overall objectives and policies of Knightsbridge and its subsidiaries.

Effective February 2004, the Company entered into an amendment to the agreementGeneral Management Agreement


F-21



Knightsbridge was provided with general administrative services by ICB Shipping (Bermuda) Limited, or the General Manager. The management fee was amendedGeneral Manager is a wholly owned subsidiary of Frontline. The General Manager subcontracted the services provided to $630,000 per year, in additionKnightsbridge and its subsidiaries to a commissionFrontline Management (Bermuda) Limited, another wholly owned subsidiary of 1.25% on gross freight revenues.Frontline. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment,Amended General Management Agreement with the Company becameGeneral Manager effective April 2, 2010, the General Manager was entitled to a management fee of $2.3 million per annum from January 1, 2010, which was subject to annual adjustments, plus a commission of 1.25% on gross freight revenues from Knightsbridge’s tanker vessels, 1% of proceeds on the sale of any of Knightsbridge’s vessels, and 1% of the cost of the purchase of vessels. In addition, Knightsbridge, in its discretion, awarded equity incentives to the General Manager based upon its performance. Such awards were subject to the approval the Knightsbridge Board. Knightsbridge was responsible for paying its own administrative expenses. In February 2006,all out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the management fee was increased to $1,150,000 per annum. On August 12, 2010,General Manager from third parties in connection with the Company entered into anservices provided under the Amended and RestatedGeneral Management Agreement, which increasedsuch as audit, legal and other professional fees, registration fees and directors' and officers' fees and expenses. The Knightsbridge Board believed that the management feeterms of the Amended General Management Agreement were substantially similar to $2,315,000 per annum effective January 1, 2010.those obtained in arm's-length negotiations in the market.

On June 25, 2010,We are able terminate the Company entered intoAmended General Management Agreement subject to five business days' prior written notice to the General Manager in the event:

the General Manager commits a material breach under the Amended General Management Agreement, and such breach remains unremedied for 30 days;
any material consent, authorization, license, approval or similar requirement for the General Manager's activities as such is modified, terminated, revoked or expires;
it becomes unlawful for the General Manager to perform the services to be provided under the terms of the Amended General Management Agreement; or
the General Manager ceases to be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Frontline.

The General Manager is able to terminate the Amended General Management Agreement upon five business days' notice in the event we commit a material breach of the terms thereof and the breach remains unremedied for 30 days. Either party is able to terminate the Amended General Management Agreement upon immediate written notice to the other party in the event such other party becomes subject to an insolvency event. Either party is able to terminate the Amended General Management Agreement upon 12 months' prior written notice to the other party, provided that such termination by us must be approved by a resolution duly adopted by the affirmative vote of shareholders holding at least 66 2/3% of our issued and outstanding common shares. The Board believed that if the Amended General Management Agreement was terminated, we would be able to obtain appropriate alternative arrangements for our management requirements.

Technical Management

The technical management of the Knightsbridge's vessels was provided by ship mangers subcontracted by our General Manager.

Commercial Management

Pursuant to a commercial management agreement, withor the Dry bulk Manager, under whichBulk Commercial Management Agreement, the Dry Bulk Manager managed our dry bulk carriers. The Dry Bulk Manager provides administrativewas able to subcontract some or all of the services provided to us and our subsidiaries to its affiliates or third parties. Pursuant to the Dry Bulk Commercial Management Agreement, the Dry Bulk Manager was entitled to receive a commission of 1.25% of all gross freight earned by our dry bulk carriers. In addition, Knightsbridge, in its discretion, awarded equity incentives to the Dry Bulk Manager based on its performance. Such awards were subject to the approval of the Knightsbridge Board.

A summary of net amounts charged by related parties in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

(in thousands of $) 2014
 2013
 2012
ICB Shipping (Bermuda) Ltd 2,315
 2,315
 2,315
Frontline Management (Bermuda) Ltd 2,962
 154
 
The Former Golden Ocean 1,034
 408
 533
Seateam Management Pte Ltd
 562
 228
 208

Net amounts charged by related parties comprise of general management and commercial expertise relating to the Company's dry bulk vessels. The Dry bulk Manager will receive 1.25% on gross freight revenues earned by the dry bulk vessels.

management fees, newbuilding supervision fees and newbuilding commission fees.

F-18F-22




While comparatives have been given for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 in the table above and as of December 31, 2013 in the tables below, it should be noted that these companies were not considered to be related parties in 2013 and 2012.

A summary of balances due from related parties for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:

(in thousands of $)   2014
 2013
Frontline 2012 Ltd   38
 
Seateam Management Pte Ltd   411
 108
Frontline Management (Bermuda) Ltd
   
 9
Frontline Ltd
   
 11
    449
 128

A summary of balances due to related parties for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:

(in thousands of $)   2014
 2013
The Former Golden Ocean   356
 158
Frontline Management (Bermuda) Ltd   1,558
 
ICB Shipping (Bermuda) Ltd   579
 
Frontline Ltd   62
 
    2,555
 158

Receivables and payables with related parties comprise unpaid commercial management fees and newbuilding supervision fees. In addition certain payables and receivables arise when the Company pays an invoice on behalf of a related party and vice versa.

We periodically issue RSUs to our directors and management companies. Please see Note 18.

23.21.   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The General Manager insures the legal liability risks for the Company's shipping activities with Assuranceforeningen SKULD and Assuranceforeningen Gard Gjensidig, both mutual protection and indemnity associations. The Company is subject to calls payable to the associations based on the Company's claims record in addition to the claims records of all other members of the associations. A contingent liability exists to the extent that the claims records of the members of the associations in the aggregate show significant deterioration, which result in additional calls on the members.

In April 2014, the Company agreed to acquire 25 SPCs from Frontline 2012, each owning a fuel efficient dry bulk newbuilding. In September 2014, the Company acquired 13 of these SPCs and one of these Capesize newbuildings, KSL Santiago, was delivered from the yard on September 22 and commenced trading in the spot market. The final installment of $37.6 million was paid at this time. On October 30, 2014, two of these Capesize newbuildings, KSL San Francisco and KSL Santos, were delivered from the yard and commenced trading in the spot market. The final installments of $36.5 million and $37.6 million, respectively, were paid at this time. The consideration for the 13 SPCs was settled by the issuance of 31.0 million shares and the assumption of newbuilding commitments of $490 million in respect of these newbuilding contracts, net of cash of $25.1 million that was acquired on the purchase of the 13 SPCs. No other working capital balances were acquired. As of December 31, 2014, the Company was committed to make newbuilding installments of $548.7 million with expected payment in 2015.

The Company acquired the remaining 12 SPCs in March 2015 and issued 31.0 million shares as consideration. The Company assumed net newbuilding commitments of $404.0 million in respect of these newbuilding contracts with expected payment of $163.3 million in 2015 and $240.7 million in 2016.

The Company has claims for unpaid charter hire owed by (i) Hong Xiang with respect to its time charter of the the Golden Zhejiang, (ii) Sanko with respect to its time charter of the Battersea, and (iii) Titan Petrochemicals Limited with respect to its bare boatbareboat charters of the VLCCs Titan Venus and Mayfair. The Company is also seeking recovery of damages for the remaining periods of these charter contracts. The aggregate amount of these claims is approximately $76 million.$2.4 million. The Company is unable to predict the outcome of these casesthis case at this time.


F-23



In 2014, the Company received $17.5 million in respect of a claim for unpaid charter hire and damages for early termination of the time charter for the Golden Zhejiang and recorded this amount as other operating income. The Company also received $1.9 million in this respect and this amount was recorded as time charter revenue as it related to unrecognized time charter revenue in respect of services previously rendered. These amounts were received as full and final settlement in connection with a claim that was lodged jointly with another claimant's claim against the same defendant.

In February 2014 and April 2014 , the Company received $0.2 million and $0.1 million as final settlements for unpaid charter hire for Battersea and recorded these amounts as other operating income.

Except as described above, to the best of the Company's knowledge, there are no legal or arbitration proceedings existing or pending which have had or may have significant effects on the Company's financial position or profitability and no such proceedings are pending or known to be contemplated.


24.22. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

There were no non-cash investing and financing activities in the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

In July and October 2010,April 2014, the Company purchased two 2010-builtacquired five SPCs from Frontline 2012, each owning a fuel efficient 180,000 dwt Capesize dry bulk carriers,newbuilding and a subsidiary of the Company acquired one 2013-built Capesize bulk carrier, Golden FutureBulk China and(renamed Golden ZhejiangKSL China), from Golden Ocean. Golden FutureKarpasia. The consideration consisted of the issuance of 15.5 million and 3.1 million shares to Frontline 2012 and Hemen (on behalf of Karpasia), respectively, which were recorded at $12.54 per share or $194.4 million in aggregate, and $150.0 million was purchased for $47.0assumed in remaining newbuilding installments. $24.0 million was paid in cash to Karpasia. Cash of $43.4 million was acquired on the purchase of the SPCs and 1,464,515 shares worth $25.0so $151.0 million. Golden Zhejiang of the consideration paid to Frontline 2012 was purchased for $47.0 million in cash and 973,684 shares worth $18.5 million.allocated to the cost of the newbuilding contracts.

In April 2014, the Company also agreed to acquire twenty-five SPCs from Frontline 2012, each owning a fuel efficient dry bulk newbuilding. In September 2014, the Company acquired thirteen of these SPCs and the transaction has been accounted for as a purchase of assets. The consideration consisted of the issuance of 31.0 million shares, which were recorded at a price per share of $11.51 or $356.8 million in aggregate and $490.0 million was assumed in remaining newbuilding installments. Cash of $25.1 million was acquired with the SPCs and so $331.7 million of the consideration paid was allocated to the cost of the newbuilding contracts. The Company acquired the remaining twelve SPCs in March 2015 and issued 31.0 million shares as consideration.

23.   MERGER WITH THE FORMER GOLDEN OCEAN

The Transaction

On October 7, 2014, the Company and the Former Golden Ocean, a dry bulk shipping company based in Bermuda and listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange, mainly operating in the Capesize and Panamax market segments, entered into an agreement and plan of merger, the Merger, pursuant to which the two companies agreed to merge, with the Company as the surviving legal entity. The Merger was approved by the shareholders of the Former Golden Ocean and the Company in separate special general meetings, which were held on March 26, 2015. At the special general meeting of the shareholders of the Company, the Amended and Restated Bye-laws of the Company were adopted and it was also agreed that the name of the Company be changed to Golden Ocean Group Limited immediately after the effective time of the Merger.

25.The Merger was completed on March 31, 2015, at which time the Company acquired 100% of the Former Golden Ocean's outstanding shares and the name of the Company was changed to Golden Ocean Group Limited. Shareholders in the Former Golden Ocean received shares in the Company as merger consideration. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, one share in the Former Golden Ocean gave the right to receive 0.13749 shares in the Company, and the Company issued a total of 61.5 million shares to shareholders in the Former Golden Ocean as merger consideration. Prior to completion of the Merger, the Company had 111,231,678 common shares outstanding.

Following completion of the Merger, and pursuant to the merger agreement, the cancellation of 51,498 common shares (which were held by the Former Golden Ocean) and the cancellation of 4,543 common shares (which account for fractional shares that we will not be distributed to the Former Golden Ocean shareholders as merger consideration), the Company has 172,765,637 common shares outstanding. Trading in the Company's shares commenced on the Oslo Stock Exchange on April 1, 2015 under the ticker code "VLCCF". Commencing on April 7, 2015, the Company's shares traded on the Oslo Stock Exchange under the ticker code "GOGL". The Company's common shares began trading under our new name and ticker symbol "GOGL" on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on April 1, 2015.

Background


F-24



After the Company completed the purchase of five SPCs and 13 SPCs, each owning a fuel efficient dry bulk newbuilding, from Frontline 2012 in April 2014 and September 2014, respectively, Hemen became a majority shareholder in the Company. At the same time, Hemen also owned or controlled approximately 41% of the outstanding shares of the Former Golden Ocean.

Each of the Company and the Former Golden Ocean periodically monitored the shipping and financial markets for opportunities that may be available to achieve their long-term operational and financial goals and to enhance shareholder value through potential strategic transactions, including business combinations, divestitures, acquisitions and similar transactions. Since Hemen and companies affiliated with Hemen had become major shareholders in both the Company and the Former Golden Ocean, Mr. Fredriksen, being on the boards of Frontline 2012 and the Former Golden Ocean, requested in early August 2014 from the management of the Former Golden Ocean and the management and Chairman of the Company to consider whether it would be in the shareholders best interest to consider a merger between the Former Golden Ocean and the Company.

The rationale for considering the merger was that both companies operate in the dry bulk market and although the Company operated exclusively in the Capesize segment while the Former Golden Ocean operated in the Capesize and Panamax segments, and have newbuildings in the Supramax segment, both companies were exposed to the same market dynamics. Both companies also had similar balance sheets when comparing the ratio of the debt to the market adjusted asset values and the same contract coverage for their fleets. In addition, the Former Golden Ocean was the commercial manager for the the Company's fleet and it would be free of administrative burden to merge the two entities. It was also seen to be favorable to only have one Hemen Related Company within the dry bulk market. Both companies believed that the consolidation of two companies in the same industry with the same main shareholder and management structures will create a more efficient investment vehicle for shareholders and lenders as well as remove any concerns regarding conflict of interest for management.

Accounting for the Merger

The merger of the Company and the Former Golden Ocean will be accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting under the provisions of ASC 805, with the Company selected as the accounting acquirer under this guidance. The factors that were considered in determining that the Company should be treated as the accounting acquirer were the relative voting rights in the combined company, the composition of the board of directors in the combined company, the relative sizes of the Company and the Former Golden Ocean, the composition of senior management of the combined company and the name of the combined company. Management believes that the relative voting rights in the combined company and the composition of the board of directors in the combined company were the most significant factors in determining the Company as the accounting acquirer.

It is expected that the merger transaction will result in a bargain purchase gain. Knightsbridge’s closing share price on the day prior to the merger announcement was $7.85 and the Company agreed to issue 61.5 million shares (valuing the announced consideration at $482.8 million). Since Former Golden Ocean’s closing share price on the day prior to the merger announcement was NOK 6.39 (or $0.986) thus valuing the Former Golden Ocean at $441.1 million, the merger announcement suggested that Knightsbridge would pay a 9.5% premium. The bargain purchase gain arising on the transaction is, in part, the result of the fall in Knightsbridge's share price from the time of the transaction negotiations and the effective date of the merger transaction, which was March 31, 2015. The closing share price on March 31, 2015 was $5.00. This results in a purchase consideration of $307.5 million without considering the impact of the Former Golden Ocean stock options and Knightsbridge's restricted stock units held by the Former Golden Ocean which are not expected to have a material impact on the purchase price consideration. The terms of the transaction, however, were largely based on the net asset valuations of Knightsbridge and the Former Golden Ocean at September 30, 2014 and the share prices of each company at that time.

Under the provisions of ASC 805, the Company is also required to disclose;

1.The revenue and earnings of the combined entity for the year ended December 31, 2014 as though the acquisition date for the business combination that occurred on March 31, 2015 had been as of January 1, 2014.
2.The nature and amount of any material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings (supplemental pro forma information).
3.The amount of acquisition-related costs and the line item in the income statement in which those expenses are recognized.
4.The amounts recognized as of the acquisition date for each major class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
5.The amount of bargain purchase gain recognized and the line item in the income statement in which the gain is recognized.

The Company considers it impracticable to disclose this information due to the recent completion date of the transaction, the limited time available to prepare the basis for the initial accounting for the merger transaction including required disclosures and the fact that the financial statements of the Former Golden Ocean are prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB.


F-25



24.   SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On January 4, 2013, the Golden Future was redelivered from its time charter. The vessel then commenced a time charter for a minimum period of 11 months and a maximum period of 13 months at a market index based daily rate.

In January 2013,2015, the Company issued 35,061 common shares and paid $181,610 to members of the Board of Directors and to the General Manager and the Dry Bulk Manager in settlement of the first and second tranches of the RSUs granted in December 2012 and December 2011, respectively, that vested on December 29, 2012. No amounts have been recorded in 2012 as the terms of settlement were not agreed as of December 31, 2012.

On January 24, 2013, the Board of Directors granted a total of 94,47649,206 RSUs pursuant to the 2010 Equity Plan to members of the Board and the two management companies. These RSUs will vest over 3 years at a rate of 1/3 of the number of RSUs granted on each anniversary of the date of grant.

In January 2015, the Company took delivery of four Capesize dry bulk newbuildings, namely the KSL Sakura, KSL Seville, KSL Seoul and Golden Kathrine, which were purchased from Frontline 2012 in September 2014.

OnIn January 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with RWE Supply & Trading GmbH, or RWE, a wholly owned subsidiary of RWE AG (a major European energy company), for chartering out a total of 15 Capesize vessels on long term, index-linked contracts. Four vessels have subsequently been delivered to RWE and the remaining vessels are expected to be delivered over the next twelve months.

In February 5, 2013,2015, an agreement was signed between the BoardCompany (as guarantor), various SPCs, (as borrowers), a syndicate of Directors declaredbanks and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. as agent for a senior secured post-delivery term loan facility of up to $425.0 million, depending on the market values of the vessels at the time of draw down, to partially finance 14 newbuilding vessels. The facility is divided into 12 tranches of $30.0 million and two tranches of $32.5 million. Each tranche is repayable in consecutive quarterly installments commencing three months after draw down with a twenty years profile and all amounts must be fully repaid by March 31, 2021, at the latest. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00%. The loan agreement contains a cross default provision and financial covenants, including free cash of a certain amount, a requirement for positive working capital and a value adjusted equity to adjusted total assets ratio.

In March 2015, the Company purchased 12 SPCs, each owning a fuel efficient Capesize dry bulk newbuilding, from Frontline 2012. The consideration for the 12 SPCs was settled by the issuance of 31.0 million shares and the assumption of newbuilding commitments of $404.0 million in respect of these newbuilding contracts, net of a cash distributionpayment from Frontline 2012 of $0.175 per share. The record date was February 20,$108.6 million. No other working capital balances were acquired.

In March 2015, the Company issued 110,128 common shares in settlement of the first, second and third tranches of the RSUs granted in January 2014, January 2013, December 2011, respectively.

On October 7, 2014, the ex cash distribution was February 15, 2013Company and the cash distributionFormer Golden Ocean, entered into an agreement and plan of merger, the Merger, pursuant to which the two companies agreed to merge, with the Company as the surviving legal entity. The Merger was paidcompleted on March 6, 2013.31, 2015 (see Note 23).

In March 2013,2015, the Company agreedtook delivery of the saleCapesize dry bulk newbuilding, KSL Stockholm, which was purchased from Frontline 2012 in September 2014. The final installment of its final VLCC (the Mayfair) for scrap with expected delivery in$36.4 million was paid at this time and $28.6 million was drawn down from the second quarter of 2013. The Company expects to record a loss of approximately $5.3$420.0 million in the first quarter of 2013. term loan facility.

In March 2013,April 2015, the Company concludedagreed to the sale of two vessels, twoChannel Alliance newbuilding contracts forand 182,000Channel Navigator, dwt Capesize bulk carriers with Japan Marine United Corporation ("JMU") in Japan. The design provided by JMU representswhich were acquired as a result of the next generation Capesize bulk carriers with the latest technology available in orderMerger, to secure fuel efficiency. an unrelated third party.The vessels are expected to be delivered to usthe buyer by the end of June 2015. Net cash proceeds are expected to be $16.8 million from which we will repay debt of $14.3 million.

In April 2015, the Company agreed to the sale of four newbuilding Capesize vessels, which were owned by the Company prior to the completion of the Merger and are currently under construction at a Chinese yard. The Company will complete the construction of these newbuildings and each vessel is expected to be delivered to the buyer following its delivery to the Company (two in 2015 and two in 2016). The Company will time charter-in three of the vessels for periods between six and twelve months. Sale proceeds of $92.4 million are expected to be received in 2015 and in 2016 ($184.8 million in aggregate). We do not expect to fund these newbuilding vessels with any debt prior to delivery to the new owners.

In April 2015, the Company agreed to a sale and leaseback transaction with Ship Finance for eight Capesize vessels. Five of these vessels (KSL China, Battersea, Belgravia, Golden Future and Golden Zhejiang) were owned by the Company prior to the completion of the Merger and three vessels (Golden Zhoushan, Golden Beijing and Golden Magnum) were acquired as a result of the Merger. These vessels were built in Korea and China between 2009 and 2013 and will be sold en-bloc for an aggregate price of $272.0 million or $34.0 million per vessel on average. $192.8 million of the sale proceeds will be used to repay debt. The vessels are expected to be delivered to Ship Finance in July 2015, subject to customary closing conditions. The vessels will be time chartered-in by one of the Company's subsidiaries for a period of 10 years. The daily time charter rate will be $17,600 during 2015. the first seven years and $14,900 thereafter. In addition, 33% of our profit from revenues above the daily time charter rate will be calculated and

F-26



paid on a quarterly basis to Ship Finance. We will have a purchase option of $112 million en-bloc after 10 years and, if such option is not exercised, Ship Finance will have the option to extend the charters by 3 years at $14,900 per day

As of March 31, 2015, after completion of the Merger, the Company was committed to make newbuilding installments of $935.5 million with expected payment of $490.8 million in 2015 and $444.7 million in 2016. Subsequent to March 31, 2015, we have reached agreements with several of our yards to delay the delivery dates of 17 newbuildings by 73 months in aggregate. These changes resulted in an increase in newbuilding commitments of $1.1 million such that, as of the date of this annual report, we have paid $15.4were committed to make newbuilding installments of $936.6 million in installments and have purchase commitments of $87.0 million relating to our two Capesize newbuilding contracts with expected payments of $5.1$330.7 million, $471.4 million and $81.9$134.5 million in 20142015, 2016 and 2015,2017, respectively.







F-19F-27