UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant x☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨☐
Check the appropriate box:
Preliminary Proxy Statement | ||
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | ||
Definitive Proxy Statement | ||
Definitive Additional Materials | ||
Soliciting Material Pursuant to |
CapitalSonida Senior Living, CorporationInc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
No fee required. | ||||
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | ||||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| |||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| |||
(5) | Total fee paid:
| |||
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | ||||
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | ||||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid:
| |||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| |||
(3) | Filing Party:
| |||
(4) | Date Filed:
|
CAPITALSONIDA SENIOR LIVING, CORPORATIONINC.
14160 DALLAS PARKWAY,16301 QUORUM DRIVE, SUITE 300160A
DALLAS,ADDISON, TEXAS 7525475001
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held May 19, 2016January 27, 2022
To the Stockholders of CapitalSonida Senior Living, Corporation:Inc.:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of CapitalSonida Senior Living, Corporation,Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held at the New York Palace Hotel, 455 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022,Company’s corporate office, at 16301 Quorum Drive, Suite 160A, Addison, Texas 75001, on the 19th27th day of May, 2016January, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. EasternCentral Time, for the following purposes:
1. To elect three directors of the Company to hold office until the Annual Meeting to be held in 20192024 or until their respective successors are duly qualified and elected;
2. To ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, independent accountants, as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;2021;
3. To cast an advisory vote on executive compensation;
4. To approve an amendment to the Company’s 2019 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended, to increase the limitation on the maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock with respect to which awards may be granted to any one participant during any calendar year to 125,000 shares of common stock; and
4.5. To transact any and all other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof.
These proposals are described in more detail in the Company’s Proxy Statement. The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 23, 2016,December 15, 2021 as the record date (the “Record Date”) for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment(s) or postponement(s) thereof. Only stockholdersholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date of shares of the Company’s common stock and Series A Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. The stock transfer books will not be closed. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for examination at the Company’s principal executive offices for ten days prior to the Annual Meeting.
Important Notice Regarding Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholders Meeting to be held on May19, 2016: The Proxy Statement and the 2015 Annual Report to Stockholders are also available atwww.proxydocs.com/csu.
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting; however, whether or not you expect to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you are urged to mark, sign, date and mail the enclosed proxy card promptly so that your shares of stock may be represented and voted in accordance with your preferences and in order to help establish the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting. If you attend the Annual Meeting and would like to vote in person, you may do so even if you have already dated, signed and returned your proxy card.
Please note that, although we currently intend to hold the Annual Meeting in person, we are actively monitoring the health and safety concerns and government recommendations and restrictions relating to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). As a result, in the event we determine that it is advisable to hold the Annual Meeting partly or solely by means of virtual communications, we will publicly announce such alternative arrangements as promptly as practicable before the Annual Meeting. We will announce any decision to modify the structure of the Annual Meeting, along with details on how to participate, by press release (which will be available on our website at www.sonidaseniorliving.com/investor-relations) and a filing with the SEC. If you are planning to attend the Annual Meeting, please be sure to check our website and SEC filings for any updates prior to the Annual Meeting. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting.
Pursuant to the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, if you hold your shares in street name, brokers, banks or other nominees will not have discretion to vote your shares on the election of directors, or the advisory
vote on executive compensation.compensation, and the proposal to amend the Company’s 2019 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan. We encourage you to provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee if you hold your shares in street name so that your voice is heard on such matters.
Important Notice Regarding Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholders Meeting to be held on January 27, 2022: The Company’s Proxy Statement and the 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders are also available atwww.proxydocs.com/snda.
By Order of the Board of Directors
Chairman of the Board |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
April 15, 2016December 22, 2021
Dallas,Addison, Texas
Page | ||||
5 | ||||
PROPOSAL TO RATIFY APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS (PROPOSAL 2) | ||||
| ||||
CAPITALSONIDA SENIOR LIVING, CORPORATIONINC.
14160 Dallas Parkway,16301 Quorum Drive, Suite 300160A
Dallas,Addison, Texas 7525475001
PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held May 21, 2015January 27, 2022
Solicitation and Revocability of Proxies
The Board of Directors (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) of CapitalSonida Senior Living, CorporationInc. (the “Company”“Company,” “Sonida,” “we,” “our” or “Capital Senior”“us”) is soliciting your proxy for voting on the proposals to be presented at our annual meeting of our stockholders to be held on May 19, 2016January 27, 2022 (the “Annual Meeting”). The Annual Meeting will be held at the New York Palace Hotel, 455 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022,Company’s corporate office, at 16301 Quorum Drive, Suite 160A, Addison, Texas 75001, on the 19th27th day of May, 2016January, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. EasternCentral Time for the purposes set forth in the accompanying notice and described in this proxy statement.Proxy Statement. When proxies in the accompanying form are properly executed and received, the shares represented thereby will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the directions noted thereon, unless the proxy is subsequently revoked.
Please note that, although we currently intend to hold the Annual Meeting in person, we are actively monitoring the health and safety concerns and government recommendations and restrictions relating to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19). As a result, in the event we determine that it is advisable to hold the Annual Meeting partly or solely by means of virtual communications, we will publicly announce such alternative arrangements as promptly as practicable before the Annual Meeting. We will announce any decision to modify the structure of the Annual Meeting, along with details on how to participate, by press release (which will be available on our website at www.sonidaseniorliving.com/investor-relations) and a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). If you are planning to attend the Annual Meeting, please be sure to check our website and SEC filings for any updates prior to the Annual Meeting. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting.
Any stockholder giving a proxy has the unconditional right to revoke his or her proxy at any time prior to the voting thereof eitherby attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person at the Annual Meeting, by delivering a duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by giving written notice of revocation to us addressed to David R. Brickman, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, 14160 Dallas Parkway,16301 Quorum Drive, Suite 300, Dallas,160A, Addison, Texas 75254.75001. However, no such revocation will be effective unless such notice of revocation has been received by us at or prior to the Annual Meeting.
Our principal executive offices are located at, and our mailing address is, 14160 Dallas Parkway,16301 Quorum Drive, Suite 300, Dallas,160A, Addison, Texas 75254.75001.
Our management does not intend to present any business at the Annual Meeting for a vote other than the matters set forth in the accompanying notice and described in this Proxy Statement and has no knowledge that others will do so. If other matters requiring a vote of our stockholders properly come before the Annual Meeting, then it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy to vote the shares represented by the proxies held by them in accordance with their judgment on such matters.
This proxy statementProxy Statement and accompanying form of proxy are being mailed on or about April 15, 2016. The annual reportDecember 22, 2021. Our Annual Report to our stockholders covering our fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2020, which was mailed to our stockholders on or about April 15, 2016,December 22, 2021, does not form any part of the materials for solicitation of proxies.
In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, our officers, directors and employees may solicit proxies by telephone, telecopy, email or through personal contact. Such officers, directors and employees will not be
additionally compensated by us but will be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses. We have retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $30,000.$8,500. This amount includes fees payable to Georgeson, but excludes salaries and expenses of our officers, directors and employees. Brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries will, in connection with shares of our common stock registered in their names, be requested to forward solicitation material to the beneficial owners of such shares of our common stock.
The cost of preparing, printing, assembling and mailing theour annual report, the accompanying notice, this proxy statementProxy Statement and the enclosed form of proxy, as well as the reasonable cost of forwarding solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of shares of our common stock, and other costs of solicitation, will be exclusively borne by us.
Some banks, brokers and other record holders have begun the practice of “householding” proxy statements and annual reports. “Householding” is the term used to describe the practice of delivering a single copy of this
proxy statement Proxy Statement and the annual reportour Annual Report to any household at which two or more stockholders share an address. This procedure would reduce the volume of duplicative information and our printing and mailing costs. We will deliver promptly, upon written or oral request, a separate copy of this proxy statementProxy Statement and the annual reportour Annual Report to aany stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of such documents was delivered. Any stockholder who would like to receive a separate copy of the proxy statementthis Proxy Statement and annual report,our Annual Report, now or in the future, should submit this request to David R. Brickman, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, at our principal executive offices, 14160 Dallas Parkway,16301 Quorum Drive, Suite 300, Dallas,160A, Addison, Texas 7525475001 or by calling (972) 770-5600. Beneficial owners sharing an address who receive multiple copies of proxy materialsthis Proxy Statement and annual reportsour Annual Report and who would like to receive a single copy of such proxy materials in the future will need to contact their broker, bank or other nominee to request that only a single copy of each document be mailed to all stockholders at the shared address in the future.
Date for Receipt of Stockholder Proposals
Stockholder proposals to be included in the proxy statement for the 20172022 annual meeting of our stockholders must be received by us at our principal executive offices on or before December 16, 2016March 8, 2022 for inclusion in the proxy statement relating to that meeting.
Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (the “Certificate of Incorporation”), establishes an advance notice procedure with regard to certain matters, including stockholder proposals and nominations of individuals for election to the Board, to be proposed at an annual meeting of our stockholders. Notice of a stockholder proposal or a director nomination to be brought at an annual meeting of our stockholders must be delivered to, or mailed and received at, our principal executive offices not less than 60 but not more than 90 days before the scheduled date of the meeting, regardless of any postponement, deferral or adjournment of that meeting to a later date; provided, however, that if less than 70 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to stockholders, the notice must be delivered or received no later than the close of business on the tenth day following the earlier of (1) the day on which such notice of the date of meeting was mailed or (2) the day on which such public disclosure was made. The notice of a stockholder proposal or a director nomination must also contain specified information and conform to certain requirements set forth in our Certificate of Incorporation. The chairman of the meeting may disregard the introduction of any such proposal or nomination if it is not made in compliance with the foregoing procedures or the applicable provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation.
Quorum and Voting
TheOnly holders of record date forat the determinationclose of business on December 15, 2021 (the “Record Date”) of shares of our stockholderscommon stock and Series A Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting wasMeeting. As of the close of business on March 23, 2016. At such time,Record Date, there were 29,940,296(i) 6,445,725 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.outstanding, and (ii) 41,250 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding, which were convertible into 1,031,250 shares of our common stock and are entitled to an aggregate of 1,031,250 votes on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement.
Each holder of our common stock is entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting. Each holder of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of our common stock into which the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock owned by such holder are convertible as of the Record Date on all matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting, and neithervoting together with the holders of our common stock as a single class. Neither our Certificate of Incorporation nor our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended (the “Bylaws”) allow, allows for cumulative voting rights. Each proposal is tabulated separately. The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy, is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. If a quorum is not present or represented at the Annual Meeting, a majority of the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, may adjourn the Annual Meeting, from time to time, without notice or other announcement at the Annual Meeting until a quorum is present or represented.
Pursuant to our Bylaws, assuming the presence of a quorum, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote, present in person or represented by proxy, at the Annual Meeting is required to (i) ratify the appointment of the independent auditorsauditors; and (ii) approve, on an advisory basis, the Company’s executive compensation. Abstentions and “broker non-votes” (as described
below), if any, will not be counted as votes cast “FOR” such proposals, but may be treated as votes “AGAINST” such proposals. With respect to an uncontested election of directors, assuming the presence of a quorum, each director nominee will be elected to the Board if the number of shares voted “FOR” the election of such director nominee exceeds the number of shares voted “WITHHOLD” for such director nominee (with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as votes cast either “FOR” or “WITHHOLD” for such director nominee’s election).
Pursuant to rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), assuming the presence of a quorum, the approval of the amendment to the Company’s 2019 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2019 Plan”), to increase the limitation on the maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock with respect to which awards may be granted to any one participant during any calendar year to 125,000 shares of common stock requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will not be counted as votes cast “FOR” or “AGAINST” such proposal.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote (1) “FOR” the election of each director nominee named in this proxy statement,Proxy Statement, (2) “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016, and2021, (3) “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the Company’s executive compensation.compensation, and (4) “FOR” the approval of the amendment to the Company’s 2019 Plan. The Board of Directors also recommends that you vote “FOR” the ability of the proxy holders to vote the proxy in their discretion with respect to any other matters that properly come before the Annual Meeting.
If you hold shares registered directly in your name and you sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, the persons named as proxy holders will vote your proxy (1) in favor of the election of each director nominee named in this proxy statement,Proxy Statement, (2) in favor of the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016,2021, (3) in favor of the approval, on an advisory basis, of the Company’s executive compensation, (4) in favor of the amendment to the Company’s 2019 Plan, and (4)(5) as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters that properly come before the Annual Meeting.
If you hold shares in “street name” and do not submit specific voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, the organization that holds your shares may generally vote your shares with respect to “discretionary” items, but not with respect to “non-discretionary”“non-discretionary” items. Discretionary items are proposals considered to be routine under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”),NYSE, and in the absence of voting instructions, your broker, bank or other nominee may vote the shares it holds in street name on such items. On non-discretionary items for which you do not submit specific voting instructions to your broker, bank, or other nominee, the shares will be treated as “broker non-votes.” Broker non-votes will be considered present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of
determining a quorum at the Annual Meeting. The proposal to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20162021 (Proposal 2) is considered to be routine, and therefore, may be voted upon by your broker, bank or other nominee if you do not provide instructions to such broker, bank or other nominee. However, pursuant to the NYSE’s rules, brokers, banks or other nominees will not have discretion to vote your shares on the election of directors (Proposal 1) and, the advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 3), and the proposal to amend the Company’s 2019 Plan (Proposal 4), as such proposals are considered to be “non-routine”“non-routine” items. We encourage you to provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee if you hold your shares in street name so that your voice is heard on such matters.
Requests for Written Copies of Annual Report
We will provide, without charge, a copy of our annual reportAnnual Report upon the written request of any registered or beneficial owner of our commoncapital stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Requests should be made by mailing David R. Brickman, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, at our principal executive offices, 14160 Dallas Parkway,16301 Quorum Drive, Suite 300, Dallas,160A, Addison, Texas 7525475001 or by calling (972) 770-5600. The SEC also maintains a website atwww.sec.govwhich contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding registrants, including us.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain information contained in this proxy statementProxy Statement constitutes “Forward-Looking Statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “would,” “intend,” “could,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate” or “continue” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. We caution readers that forward-
lookingExamples of forward-looking statements, including,include, without limitation, those relating to ourthe Company’s future business prospects revenues,and strategies, financial results, working capital, liquidity, capital needs and expenditures, interest costs, insurance availability and income,contingent liabilities. Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company’s actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to: the impact of COVID-19, including the actions taken to prevent or contain the spread of COVID-19; the Company’s near-term debt maturities, and other conditions and events described herein on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern; the Company’s ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations, additional proceeds from debt refinancings, and proceeds from the sale of assets to satisfy its short and long-term debt obligations and to fund the Company’s capital improvement projects to expand, redevelop, and/or reposition its senior living communities; the Company’s ability to obtain additional capital on terms acceptable to it; the Company’s ability to extend or refinance its existing debt as such debt matures; the Company’s compliance with its debt agreements, including certain financial covenants and the terms and conditions of its recent forbearance agreements, and the risk of cross-default in the event such non-compliance occurs; the Company’s ability to complete acquisitions and dispositions upon favorable terms or at all; the risk of oversupply and increased competition in the markets which the Company operates; the risks related to an epidemic, pandemic or other health crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, including the transmission of its highly contagious variants and sub-lineages, and the development and availability of vaccinations and other related treatments; the risk of increased competition for skilled workers due to several important factors herein identified. These factors include our ability to find suitable acquisition properties at favorable terms, financing, licensingwage pressure and business conditions,changes in regulatory requirements; the departure of the Company’s key officers and personnel; the cost and difficulty of complying with applicable licensure, legislative oversight, or regulatory changes; the risks of downturnassociated with a decline in economic conditions generally, satisfaction of closing conditions such as those pertaining to licensure,generally; the adequacy and continued availability of the Company’s insurance at commercially reasonable rates,policies and the Company’s ability to recover any losses it sustains under such policies; changes in accounting principles and interpretations, among others,interpretations; and the other risks and factors identified from time to time in ourthe Company’s reports filed with the SEC.
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS AND STOCK OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our commoncapital stock as of March 23, 2016November 30, 2021 by: (i) each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our commoncapital stock; (ii) each of our directors and director nominees; (iii) each of our “named executive officers” set forth in the Summary Compensation Table below; and (iv) all of our current executive officers and directors as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each person listed below is 14160 Dallas Parkway,16301 Quorum Drive, Suite 300, Dallas,160A, Addison, Texas 75254.75001.
Shares Beneficially Owned(1)(2) | ||||||||
Name of Beneficial Owner | Number | Percent of Class | ||||||
Arbiter Partners Capital Management LLC | 2,294,950 | (3) | 7.7 | % | ||||
HCRE Special Investment LLC | 1,878,829 | (4) | 6.3 | % | ||||
BlackRock, Inc. | 1,824,553 | (5) | 6.1 | % | ||||
Lawrence A. Cohen | 960,934 | (6) | 3.2 | % | ||||
Keith N. Johannessen | 543,195 | (7) | 1.8 | % | ||||
Carey P. Hendrickson | 154,540 | (8) | * | |||||
David R. Brickman | 134,262 | (9) | * | |||||
James A. Moore | 69,180 | (10) | * | |||||
Jill M. Krueger | 41,460 | (11) | * | |||||
Joseph G. Solari | 41,180 | (12) | * | |||||
Philip A. Brooks | 39,468 | (13) | * | |||||
Ronald A. Malone | 30,060 | (14) | * | |||||
Michael W. Reid | 24,060 | (15) | * | |||||
E. Rodney Hornbake | 18,560 | (16) | * | |||||
Kimberly S. Lody | 6,690 | (17) | * | |||||
Ed Grier (new director nominee) | 0 | * | ||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (17 persons) | 2,139,555 | (18) | 7.1 | % |
Shares Beneficially Owned(1) | ||||||||
Name of Beneficial Owner | Number | Percent of Class | ||||||
5% or More Stockholder | ||||||||
Conversant Capital LLC(2) | 5,047,981 | 57.8 | % | |||||
Seymour Pluchenik(3) | 775,637 | 8.9 | % | |||||
Arbiter Partners Capital Management LLC(4) | 613,820 | 7.0 | % | |||||
Peter DeSorcy (5) | 582,378 | 6.7 | % | |||||
Named Executive Officers and Directors | ||||||||
Kimberly S. Lody(6) | 127,100 | 1.5 | % | |||||
Brandon M. Ribar(7) | 68,857 | * | ||||||
David R. Brickman(8) | 52,252 | * | ||||||
Philip A. Brooks(9) | 7,227 | * | ||||||
Jill M. Krueger(10) | 7,134 | * | ||||||
Noah Beren | 0 | — | ||||||
Benjamin Harris | 0 | — | ||||||
David W. Johnson | 0 | — | ||||||
Max J. Levy | 0 | — | ||||||
Shmuel Lieberman | 0 | — | ||||||
Elliot R. Zibel | 0 | — | ||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)(11) | 360,641 | 4.1 | % | |||||
Carey P. Hendrickson(12) | — | — |
* | Less than one percent. |
(1) |
The percentages indicated are based on |
(2) | The address of the reporting persons reported on this line is c/o Conversant Capital LLC, 25 Deforest Avenue, Summit, NJ 07901. Conversant Capital LLC (“Conversant Capital”) is the investment manager of and makes investment decisions for the Conversant Investors. Conversant GP Holdings LLC (“Conversant GP”) is the general partner of each of the Conversant Investors. Michael J. Simanovsky is the managing member of Conversant GP. By virtue of these relationships, each of Conversant Capital, Conversant GP, and Mr. Simanovsky may be deemed to beneficially own shares (including shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock or upon exercise of warrants to purchase common stock) owned directly by the Conversant Investors. Shares reported on this line consist of 2,985,481 shares of issued and outstanding common stock; 1,031,250 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 41,250 shares of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, which constitutes 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock as of November 30, 2021; and 1,031,250 |
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants of the Company, in each case |
(3) | The address of the reporting persons reported on this line is c/o GF Investments, 810 Seventh Avenue, 28th Floor, New York, NY 10019. Shares reported on this line represent shares that may be deemed to be beneficially owned by Seymour Pluchenik, Sam Levinson, Simon Glick, Silk Partners, LP (“Silk”); Siget, LLC (“Siget”); Siget NY Partners, L.P. (“Siget NY”); 1271 Associates, LLC (“1271 Associates”); and PF Investors, LLC (“PF Investors”). Mr. Levinson is the chief investment officer of Siget NY. Siget NY is the investment manager of and makes investment decisions for Silk. 1271 Associates is the General Partner of Siget NY. Messrs. Glick and Pluchenik are the managing members of 1271 Associates. Siget is the General Partner of Silk. Messrs. Glick and Pluchenik are the managing members of Siget. By virtue of these relationships, each of Siget NY, 1271 Associates, Siget and Messrs. Levinson, Glick and Pluchenik may be deemed to beneficially own the shares owned directly by Silk. Mr. Pluchenik is the manager of PF Investors, and by virtue of this relationship, Mr. Pluchenik may be deemed to beneficially own the shares owned directly by PF Investors. Based solely on a Schedule 13D/A filed on November 9, 2021, (i) Seymour Pluchenik has the sole voting and dispositive power with respect to none of the shares and shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 775,637 shares, (ii) Sam Levinson, Simon Glick, Silk, Siget, Siget NY and 1271 Associates have the sole voting and dispositive power with respect to none of the shares and shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 740,112 shares, and (iii) PF Investors has the sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 35,525 shares and shared voting and dispositive power with respect to none of the shares. |
(4) | The address of Arbiter Partners Capital Management LLC (“Arbiter Partners”) is 530 Fifth Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10036. Arbiter Partners |
|
(5) | The address of |
beneficially own the shares beneficially owned by Pangea. Mr. DeSorcy also co-owns Ortelius Capital and is a Managing Member of Ortelius Capital with dispositive and voting control over portfolios managed by Ortelius Capital, and, as a result Mr. DeSorcy may be deemed to beneficially own the shares beneficially owned by Hudson. Each of Pangea, Ortelius Advisors, Ortelius Capital, Hudson and Peter DeSorcy has sole voting |
(6) | Consists of |
(7) | Consists of |
(8) | Consists of |
(9) | Consists of |
Consists of |
Includes |
(12) | Mr. Hendrickson resigned as the Company’s Executive Vice President and |
(PROPOSAL 1)
Nominees and Continuing Directors
Unless otherwise directed in the enclosed proxy, it is the intention of the persons named in such proxy to vote the shares represented by such proxy for the election of each of the following nominees as a member of the Board of Directors, each to hold office until the annual meeting of our stockholders to be held in 20192024 and until his or her successor is duly qualified and elected or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. Mr. BrooksMs. Krueger and Mr. MaloneMessrs. Levy and Zibel are presently members of the Board of Directors.
Our Board is divided into three classes: Class I (terms expire at 2022 annual meeting), Class II (terms expire at 2023 annual meeting) and Class III (terms expire at 2021 annual meeting). The Board currently consists of nine directors with three directors in each of Class.
As further discussed below under “Board of Directors and Mr. Grier is not presentlyCommittees—Investor Rights Agreement,” on November 3, 2021 we entered into an agreement (the “Investor Rights Agreement”) with Conversant Dallas Parkway (A) LP (“Conversant Fund A”), Conversant Dallas Parkway (B) LP, affiliates of Conversant Capital LLC (“Conversant Fund B” and, together with Conversant Fund A, the “Conversant Investors”), and Silk Partners, LP (“Silk”) pertaining to, among other things, the appointment of a membercertain number of designees of the Conversant Investors and Silk, respectively, to the Board. Pursuant to the terms of the Investor Rights Agreement, on November 3, 2021, Conversant became entitled to designate four individuals to be appointed to the Board and Silk became entitled to designate two individuals to be appointed to the Board. Immediately prior to such appointments, the Board consisted of Directors.eight directors and one vacancy. In connection with the appointment of the respective designees of Conversant and Silk to the Board, Ed A. Grier, Dr. E. Rodney Hornbake, Ross B. Levin, Steven T. Plochocki and Michael W. Reid, each an existing director, resigned from the Board, and Noah Beren, Benjamin Harris, David W. Johnson, Max J. Levy, Shmuel Lieberman and Elliot R. Zibel were appointed to fill the six vacancies on the Board. As a result of such changes, the Board currently consists of nine directors with three directors in each of Classes I, II and III. The resignations of Dr. Hornbake and Messrs. Grier, Levin, Plochocki and Reid did not result from any disagreements with management or the Board.
Name | Age | Position(s) | Director’s Term Expires | Age | Position(s) | Class | Director’s Term Expires | |||||||||||||||||
Nominees: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jill M. Krueger | 61 | Director | III | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Max J. Levy | 31 | Director | III | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Elliot R. Zibel | 41 | Director | III | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing Directors: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Philip A. Brooks | 57 | Director | 2019 | 62 | Director | I | 2022 | |||||||||||||||||
Ronald A. Malone | 61 | Director | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ed Grier | 61 | Director Nominee | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing Directors: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lawrence A. Cohen | 62 | Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||
E. Rodney Hornbake | 65 | Director | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Benjamin Harris | 46 | Director | I | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
David W. Johnson | 60 | Director | I | 2022 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Kimberly S. Lody | 50 | Director | 2017 | 55 | Chief Executive Officer, President and Director | II | 2023 | |||||||||||||||||
Keith N. Johannessen | 59 | President and Chief Operating Officer and Director | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Jill M. Krueger | 56 | Director | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Michael W. Reid | 62 | Director | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Noah Beren | 40 | Director | II | 2023 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shmuel Lieberman | 37 | Director | II | 2023 |
The following is a brief biography of each nominee and each current director, including each director whose term will continue after the Annual Meeting.
Nominees for Election for Three-Year Terms Expiring at the 20192024 Annual Meeting:
Philip A. BrooksJill M. Krueger has been a director since 2004. She is the founding President and Chief Executive Officer of Symbria, Inc., a leading national developer and provider of innovative, outcome-driven programs established in 1995 that enhance the lives of the geriatric population. She also serves on the Board of Directors of iMedia
Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ: IMBI), where she sits on the Audit and Compensation Committees, and is a member of the Board of Directors of the American Board of Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine and the Board of Directors of the Senior Care Pharmacy Coalition. Before she joined Symbria, Ms. Krueger was a partner at KPMG LLP responsible for overseeing the firm’s national Long-Term Care and Retirement Housing Practice. She received a B.S. from Northern Illinois University. She is a Certified Public Accountant and a Certified Management Accountant.
Max J. Levy has been a director since November 2021. Mr. Levy is a Principal at Conversant Capital LLC. From 2015-2020, Mr. Levy was an investment analyst at The Baupost Group where he focused on real estate investments in North America and Europe. During this time, Mr. Levy was responsible for sourcing and evaluating equity and debt investments in all property types in both private real estate and public securities. Before joining Baupost, Mr. Levy began his career as an investment banking analyst for Hentschel & Company, a boutique real estate advisory firm, where he assisted public REITs and private real estate companies on mergers, acquisitions, and capital raising. He received a B.A. in Intellectual History from the University of Pennsylvania where he graduated summa cum laude.
Elliot R. Zibel, CFA, has been a director since November 2021. He is the CEO and Co-Founder of Select Dental Management, which he helped found. Mr. Zibel is responsible for M&A, strategy and operations for 32 practice Dental Support Organizations, and has completed 30 acquisitions and raised more than $70 million of equity and debt capital from institutional investors during his tenure. Previously, he worked in the financial sector at multi-billion-dollar firms including Hitchwood Capital Management L.P., Folger Hill Asset Management, Pennant Capital Management, Breeden Partners L.P. and Matrix Asset Advisors LLC. Mr. Zibel received a Bachelor of Economics and Political Science from Union College.
Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2022 Annual Meeting:
Philip A. Brooks has been a director since 2010. Mr. BrooksHe is a principal investor and managing partner ofin Select Living, LLC, which acquires properties to develop to special market dynamics. Mr. Brooks has more than 32 years of experience as a seniors housing business focused on defined affinity groups,financier and is an agent forinvestor, credit manager, and product/policy analyst. He also serves as a large fund manager investingportfolio advisor to NRV, a venture capital firm funding early stage growth companies in the seniors housing space.Virginia. Previously, Mr. Brooks served as a Senior Vice President, Loan Production for Walker & Dunlop, LLC, a NYSE-listed provider of financial services for owners and developers of commercial real estate throughout the United States. Prior to Walker & Dunlop, LLC, from February 2011, Mr. Brooksthat, he served as Senior Vice President, Loan Production for CWCapital, LLC, a mortgage finance company, which was acquired by Walker & Dunlop, LLC in September 2012. From 1996 to October 2010, Mr. Brooks servedand in various senior executive positions with Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC, a national mortgage bank, which was previously known as Capmark Finance Inc. and GMAC Commercial Mortgage. He has closed over $5 billion of seniors housing and healthcare financings and has been on multi-disciplinary teams in sourcing, underwriting and syndicating $15 billion in committed financings in North America and Europe. Mr. Brooks has 30 years of experience in the commercial real estate finance industry.bank. He was a founding member of the American Seniors Housing Association, a leading trade association promoting seniors housing, and was on the Board of Directors of the National Investment Center for the Seniors Housing & Care Industry, a leading trade association promoting the industry to the capital markets. On October 25, 2009, Capmark Financial Group Inc.Mr. Brooks received a B.S. in History and certainPolitical Science from the University of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11Tennessee and did graduate studies in Information Systems Management at The George Washington University.
Benjamin Harris, CFA, has been a director since November 2021. He is the founder and CEO of Pinedale Capital Partners, a dedicated industrial real estate operating platform based in New York. Previously, Mr. Harris was the CEO of Link Logistics (Blackstone’s U.S. Bankruptcy Code.Industrial Real Estate platform). Before that, he served as President of Gramercy Property Trust (NYSE: GPT), the Head of Net Lease Investments of Northcliffe/Annaly Capital Management and the Head of U.S. Investments of W. P. Carey & Co. LLC (NYSE: WPC). Mr. Harris received a Joint BSc in Economics from the University of Kings College/Dalhousie University, Canada.
Ronald A. MaloneDavid W. Johnson has been a director since 2010.November 2021. He is Co-Founder & Managing Director of Horizon Capital, a land acquisition and land development company. Prior to Horizon Capital, he founded Aimbridge Hospitality and served as its CEO. Mr. MaloneJohnson previously spent 17 years at Wyndham International, where he helped add over 400 hotels to the Wyndham portfolio. Additionally, he served as President of Wyndham Hotels, overseeing approximately 15,000 employees and $3 billion in annual revenue. Mr. Johnson
serves as a Director on Board of Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. (NYSE: HGV) and sits on the Audit and Compensation Committees. Previously, he served on the Strategic Hotels (NYSE: BEE) Board as a member of the Board of Directors of Gentiva Health Services, Inc. (“Gentiva”), a provider of comprehensive home health services that was acquired by Kindred Healthcare, Inc. in 2015, from June 2002 until May 2012, having served as Chairman from June 2002 to December 2010. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Gentiva from June 2002 until
December 2008, as Executive Vice President of such company from March 2000 until June 2002,Audit and Corporate Governance Committees, and as Presidenta Director of Gentiva’s home health services division from January 2001 to June 2002. Prior to joining Gentiva, Mr. Malone served in various positions with The Olsten Corporation, including Executive Vice President of The Olsten Corporation and President, Olsten Staffing Services, United States and Canada. Mr. Malone has been a director of Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. since July 2007.Gaylord Entertainment (NYSE: GET). He is a former director ofalso on the NationalU.S. Travel Association for Home Care & Hospice and(USTA) board as a former director, chairman and founding member of the Alliance for Home Health Quality and Innovation.
Ed Grier is nominated for election as a new director to the Board. Mr. Grier has been the Dean of the Virginia Commonwealth University (“VCU”) School of Business since March 2010. Prior to joining VCU, Mr. Grier spent approximately 29 years with the Walt Disney Company (“Disney”) beginning in 1981. He served as the President of the Disneyland Resort from 2006 until 2010 and held various senior financial and operational roles during his career with Disney. Mr. Grier serves as a director of NVR, Inc., a NYSE-listed residential homebuilding company which operates in two business segments: homebuilding and mortgage banking (“NVR”),Chairman’s Circle and as a member of the audit and qualified legal compliance committees of NVR’s board of directors. He is alsoUSTA’s CEO Roundtable. Mr. Johnson received a director of the Middleburg Trust Company, a provider of wealth management services and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Middleburg Financial Corporation. In addition, Mr. Grier serves on the boards of the Greater Richmond Chamber of Commerce, The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation and ChildFund International and serves as a trustee for Brandmanbachelor’s degree in Business Economics from Northeastern Illinois University. Mr. Grier is also a Certified Public Accountant. As noted below under “Board of Directors and Committees — Stockholder Agreement,” the Board’s nomination of Mr. Grier as a director satisfies the Company’s obligations under the Stockholder Agreement (as defined below).
Directors Continuing in Office Until the 20172023 Annual Meeting:
Lawrence A. Cohen has served as one of our directors since November 1996 and as Vice Chairman of the Board since November 1996. He has served as our Chief Executive Officer since May 1999 and was our Chief Financial Officer from November 1996 to May 1999. From 1991 to 1996, Mr. Cohen served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Paine Webber Properties Incorporated. Mr. Cohen serves on the boards of various charitable organizations and is active in several industry associations. Mr. Cohen was a founding member and is Chairman of the Board of Directors of the American Seniors Housing Association, and serves on the Operator Advisory Board of the National Investment Center for the Seniors Housing & Care Industry. He received an LL.M. in Taxation from New York University School of Law, a JD from St. John’s University School of Law, and a BBA in Accounting from The George Washington University. Mr. Cohen is a licensed attorney and is also a Certified Public Accountant (currently inactive). Mr. Cohen has had positions with businesses involved in senior living for 31 years.
E. Rodney Hornbake, M.D. has been a director since 2011. Dr. Hornbake serves as the Managing Partner of Essex Internal Medicine, a private practice of internal medicine and geriatrics, that he formed in 2002. Dr. Hornbake served as Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer of Gentiva from March 2000 to April 2002, and he has continued to serve in a consulting role to Gentiva since April 2002. Gentiva was spun-off from Olsten Corporation, a staffing services company, that Dr. Hornbake joined as part of its management team in 1999. Dr. Hornbake also served as Medical Director of Care Centrix, a home care benefits management company, from November 1999 until 2002, and he continued to serve in a consulting role to Care Centrix from 2002 to 2010. Dr. Hornbake previously served as Vice President and Medical Director of the North Shore-LIJ Health System in New York from 1996 to 1999, as Chief Medical Officer for Aetna Professional Management Corporation from 1994 to 1996, and as Chief of Medicine for the Park Medical Group/Park Ridge Health System in New York from 1993 to 1994. Dr. Hornbake served as Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine at the University of Connecticut from August 2002 to 2010 and as an Associate Professor (Adjunct) of Hofstra University from 1998 to 2004. Dr. Hornbake served on the board of Equity Health Partners, a privately-held start-up technology company, from 2008 until 2012, and he served on the Commission on Office Laboratory Accreditation for ten years, including two years as its Chairman.
Kimberly S. Lody has been a director since 2014. She has been Chief Executive Officer and President of Capital Senior Living since January 2019. Previously, she served as North America President and Senior Vice President of GN Hearing, a global manufacturer of hearing instruments and hearing protection devices. Ms. Lody has served as the Presidentmore than 26 years of GN ReSound, an international manufacturer of hearing aids, since September 2011. Prior to joining GN ReSound, from August 2009 until April 2011, Ms. Lody held various positions at Coloplast Corp., a global provider of ostomy care, urology and continence care, and wound and skin care, including serving as President, Chronic Care (from 2010 to 2011), Vice President of Marketing (from 2009 to 2010), and Interim Vice President of Marketing (during 2009). Prior to joining Coloplast Corp., from July 2004 until August 2009, Ms. Lody was an independent consultant focusing on providing interim leadership and strategic revenue enhancement to clientssenior management experience in a variety of industries,clinical and commercial health care settings, including health insurance, durable medical equipment, home healthcare, consumer products, automotiveinfusion therapy, respiratory therapy, specialty pharmaceuticals and insurance services. From January 2003 until July 2004,medical devices. In addition, Ms. Lody served ashas been appointed to the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating OfficerBoard of Senior Homecare, Inc.Directors of ConvaTec Group Plc (LON: CTEC), a home healthcare provider,global medical products and from May 1997 untiltechnologies company, effective February 2003, she held various positions at Gentiva, including serving as Senior Vice President2022. She also serves on the board of Argentum and Chief Marketing Officer (from 2001 to 2003), Vice President — Marketing and Communications (from 1998 to 2000), and Vice President — Strategic Planning (from 1997 to 1998). Ms. Lodyon the NIC Operator Advisory Board. She received a Master of Business Administration degree from Wake Forest University and a Bachelor of Arts degree in business administration from Hiram College.
Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2018 Annual Meeting:
Keith N. JohannessenNoah Beren has been a director since 1999. Mr. Johannessen hasNovember 2021. He joined GF Investments in 2014 and is currently Head of Asset Management for the firm. His responsibilities include overseeing an extensive real estate portfolio of office, multi-family, and land assets. Previously he served as oura Vice President since 1994focusing on deal execution and our Chief Operating Officer since 1999. He previouslyportfolio management. From 2012 to 2014, Mr. Beren served as our Executivea Vice President at a private independent oil and gas company. Mr. Beren received a First Talmudic Degree from May 1993 to February 1994. Mr. Johannessen has more than 37 yearsTalmudical Yeshiva of operational experience in seniors housing. He began his senior housing career in 1978 with Life Care Services Corporation and then joined Oxford Retirement Services, Inc. as Executive Vice President. Mr. Johannessen later served as Senior Manager in the health care practice of Ernst & Young LLP prior to joining the Company in 1993. He has served on the State of the Industry and Model Assisted Living Regulations Committees of the American Seniors Housing Association. Mr. Johannessen holds a Bachelor of Arts degree.Philadelphia.
Jill M. KruegerShmuel Lieberman has been a director since February 2004. Ms. KruegerNovember 2021. He is the President and Chief Executive of Symbria, Inc. (formerly Health Resources Alliance, Inc.) and its affiliates, a national developer and provider of innovative, outcome-driven programs that enhance the lives of the geriatric population. Before joining Symbria, Inc., Ms. Krueger was a partner at KPMG LLP responsible for overseeing the firm’s national Long-term Care and Retirement Housing Practice. Ms. Krueger served as a public commissioner for the Continuing Care Accreditation Commission and as a member of its financial advisory board from 1987 to 2001. She is also on the Fifth Third Bank — Illinois Affiliate Board of Directors.
Michael W. Reid has been a director since October 2009. Mr. Reid has served as a partner at Herald Square Properties, a real estate investment and management company that manages two office buildings totaling nearly 1.0 million square feet in Midtown Manhattan and recently purchased and sold two office buildings in Times Square South with the Davis Companies, since 2009. Mr. Reid is also asenior member of the Boardinvestment team at GF Investments. Mr. Lieberman oversees the investment process for public and private investments across a wide range of Directorsindustries, strategies and the Chairmanasset classes. He is a former board member of the Audit CommitteeTradAir Ltd and has been an observer to a number of Inland Residential Properties Trust, Inc.,portfolio companies. Mr. Lieberman received a real estate investment trust formed in December 2013 to acquire multifamily properties located in metropolitan areas throughout the United States. Mr. Reid has nearly 35 yearsMaster of investment bankingBusiness Administration degree from Baruch College and real estate experience, including heading Lehman Brothers REIT equity practice for nine years (from 1992 to 2001) as Managing Director in the Global Real Estate Department. In that capacity, he was responsible for developing and implementing the business strategy for its REIT equity underwriting business. Mr. Reid also served as Chief Operating Officer at SL Green Realty Corp. from 2001-2004, where some of his responsibilities included strategic planning, finance and reporting, capital markets, operations and budgeting for a $4 billion publicly-traded REIT. From 2004-2006, he served as President of Ophir Energy Corp., a company that invested in oil and gas production in Oklahoma. From 2006-2008, he served as Chief Operating Officer of Twining Properties, a real estate company specializing in high rise development in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Mr. Reid holds a Bachelor of Arts and MasterRabbinic Studies degree from the Rabbinical College of Divinity, both from Yale University.America.
When considering whether directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the Company’s
business and structure, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board (the “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”) focused primarily on the information discussed in each of the Directors’ individual biographies set forth above. In particular, with regard to Messrs. Cohen and Johannessen, the Board considered their strong background in the senior living industry — over 31 years in the case of Mr. Cohen and over 37 years in the case of Mr. Johannessen — in addition to the many years of experience with the Company represented by Messrs. Cohen and Johannessen, our Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer, respectively. With respect to Ms. Krueger, the Board considered her significant experience, expertise and background with regard to accounting matters, which includes specialization in health care, and rehabilitative and wellness services for elderly persons. With regard to Mr. Reid,Levy, the Board considered his nearly 36 years ofsubstantial experience in investment banking and real estate including heading Lehman Brothers REIT equity practice for nine years as Managing Director in the Global Real Estate Department, and his senior level public company experiences, which experiences will help the Company identify and capitalize on opportunities to build its business as well as bring fresh insights that will benefit both the Board and the Company.investment banking. With respect to Mr. Malone,Zibel, the Board considered his executive level and boardsignificant management experience in the healthcare industry, including his experience with public companies and his extensivea large national service provider to senior level operational experiences, particularly in health care and wellness services. Mr. Malone has an intimate knowledge of the home health industry and expertise in the legislative and regulatory landscape affecting healthcare companies.living communities. With respect to Mr. Brooks, the Board considered his extensive experience in the senior living industry and strong background in senior housing financing. With regard to Dr. Hornbake,Mr. Harris, the Board considered his positionsignificant experience in real estate investments, development, leasing and operation, including serving as President a publicly-traded REIT. With respect to Mr. Johnson, the Board considered his extensive experience in the hospitality industry, including serving as CEO of a leading hotel management company, along with his prior service as a practicing physician specializing in geriatrics, his strong understanding of emerging needs of the aging population, his service as Chief Medical Officerdirector for a large health services organization, and his involvement inseveral public policy as it affects seniors.companies. With regard to Ms. Lody, in addition to her many years of experience with the Company, including most recently as its President and Chief Executive Officer, the Board considered herMs. Lody’s executive level experiences in marketing services and products to seniors as well as successfully managing, growing and branding companies within the healthcare industry. With regardrespect to Mr. Grier,Beren, the Board considered his operational expertise from operating a multi-billion dollar business for Disney,substantial experience in the
real estate industry. With regard to Mr. Lieberman, the Board considered his brand marketingsignificant investment experience. In addition, with respect to Messrs. Levy, Beren and customer-experience expertise obtained while managing oneLieberman, the Board considered that such individuals could bring to the Board an important perspective of significant stockholders of the world’s most recognized brandsCompany As noted below under “Board of Directors and his financial expertise.Committees—Investor Rights Agreement,” the Company is obligated to nominate Messrs. Beren, Harris, Johnson, Levy, Lieberman and Zibel as directors pursuant to the terms of the Investor Rights Agreement.
The Board does not anticipate that any of the aforementioned nominees for director will refuse or be unable to accept election as a director, or be unable to serve as a director. Should any of them become unavailable for nomination or election or refuse to be nominated or to accept election as a director, then the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy intend to vote the shares represented in such proxy for the election of such other person or persons as may be nominated or designated by the Board.
There are no family relationships among any of our directors, director nominees or executive officers.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each of the individuals nominated for election as a director.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES
General
Our Board of Directors currently consists of nine directors.directors and is expected to consist of nine directors following the Annual Meeting. The Board has determined that PhilipNoah Beren, Phillip A. Brooks, Kimberly S. Lody, Dr. E. Rodney Hornbake,Benjamin Harris, David W. Johnson, Jill M. Krueger, Ronald A. Malone, James A. MooreMax J. Levy, Shmuel Lieberman and Michael W. Reid,Elliot R. Zibel, each an existing director, and Ed Grier, a nominee for election at the Annual Meeting as a new director, are “independent” within the meaning of the corporate governance rules of the NYSE and no such individual has any relationship with us, except as a director, stockholder and/or director nominee, as applicable. In addition, we have adopted a Director Independence Policy, as described in greater detail below under the heading “Director“—Director Independence Policy,” which establishes guidelines for the Board to follow in making the determination as to which of our directors is “independent.” Our Director Independence Policy is available on our website athttp://www.capitalsenior.comwww.sonidaseniorliving.com in the Investor Relations section and is available in print to any stockholder who requests it. The Board has determined that Messrs. Beren, Brooks, Hornbake, Malone, MooreHarris, Johnson, Levy, Lieberman and Reid and Ms. LodyZibel and Ms. Krueger, each an existing director, and Mr. Grier, a nominee for election at the Annual Meeting as a new director, are “independent” in accordance with our Director Independence Policy.
During 2015,2020, the Board held nine14 board meetings, including regularly scheduled and special meetings. During 2015,2020, no incumbent director attended fewer than 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which such director served. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, each of our directors is expected to attend all meetings of the Board, the annual stockholders meeting and meetings of the committees of the Board on which they serve. Messrs. Cohen, Johannessen, Brooks, Hornbake, Malone, Moore and Reid and Ms. Lody attendedEach of our 2015incumbent directors who were directors at the time of our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.stockholders attended such meeting. Our independent directors meet in executive sessions without any management directors, and Mr. Moore, the independent Chairman of the Board presided over these meetings during 2015.2020.
Advance Resignation Policy
Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, for uncontested director elections, as a condition to nomination by the Board of an incumbent director, such nominee must submit an irrevocable resignation to the Board. Any such nominee who receives a greater number of votes “withholding authority” for or “against” such nominee’s election than votes “for” such nominee’s election (with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as votes cast either “for” or “withhold authority” for or “against” such nominee’s election), and who remains on the Board as a holdover director, will have his or her irrevocable resignation considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Following the certification of the voting results in an uncontested election of directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board as to the treatment of any such nominee that did not receive the requisite majority vote, including whether to accept or reject any such tendered resignation. Thereafter, the Board will determine whether to accept the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation. If such nominee’s resignation is accepted by the Board, then such director will immediately cease to be a member of the Board upon the date of such acceptance.
Director Independence Policy
The Board undertakes an annual review of the independence of all non-management directors. In advance of the meeting at which this review occurs, each non-management director is asked to provide the Board with full information regarding the director’s business and other relationships with us in order to enable the Board to evaluate the director’s independence. Directors have an affirmative obligation to inform the Board of any material changes in their circumstances or relationships that may impact their designation by the Board as “independent.” This obligation includes all business relationships between, on the one hand, directors or members of their immediate family, and, on the other hand, us, whether or not such business relationships are described above.
No director qualifies as “independent” unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with us. The following guidelines are considered in making this determination:
a director who is, or has been within the last three years, employed by us, or whose immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, one of our executive officers, is not “independent”;
a director who received, or whose immediate family member received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from us, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service), is not “independent”;
a director (a) who is or whose immediate family member is a current partner of a firm that is our internal or external auditor, (b) who is a current employee of such a firm, (c) whose immediately family member is a current employee of such a firm and participates in the firm’s audit, assurance or tax compliance (but not tax planning) practice, or (d) who is, or whose immediate family member was within the last three years (but is no longer), a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on our audit within that time, is not “independent”;
a director who is, or whose immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of our present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that other company’s compensation committee, is not “independent”;
a director who is a current employee, or whose immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, us for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues, is not “independent”;
a director who serves as an executive officer, or whose immediate family member serves as an executive officer, of a tax exempt organization that, within the preceding three years, received contributions from us, in any single fiscal year, of an amount equal to the greater of $1 million or 2% of such organization’s consolidated gross revenue, is not “independent”; and
a director who has a beneficial ownership interest of 10% or more in a company which has received remuneration from us in any single fiscal year in an amount equal to the greater of $1 million or 2% of such company’s consolidated gross revenue is not “independent” until three years after falling below such threshold.
In addition, members of the Compensation Committee must not have any relationship or affiliation with us that would materially affect the director’s ability to be independent from management as a Compensation Committee member and must otherwise be “independent” under our Director Independence Policy. Members of the Audit Committee may not accept any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from us or any of our subsidiaries or affiliates other than directors’ compensation.
The terms “us,” “we” and “our” refer to CapitalSonida Senior Living, CorporationInc. and any direct or indirect subsidiary of CapitalSonida Senior Living, Corporation,Inc., which is part of the consolidated group. An “immediate family member” includes a person’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers and fathers-in-law, sons and daughters-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares such person’s home.
Committees
Committees of the Board include the Audit Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and the Compensation Committee.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee consists of Ms. Krueger (chair) and Messrs. Brooks, Harris and Reid and Ms. Krueger,Johnson, each of whom is “independent” as defined by the listing standards of the NYSE in effect as of the date of this proxy statement. Proxy Statement.
The Board has determined that Ms. Krueger qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC regulations. The Board has adopted an amended and restated Audit Committee Charter, which is available on our website athttp://www.capitalsenior.comwww.sonidaseniorliving.com in the Investor Relations section and is also available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy. Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee:
oversees our financial reporting process and internal control system;
appoints, replaces, provides for compensation of and oversees our independent accountants;
provides an open avenue of communication among our independent accountants, senior management and the Board; and
conducts an annual review of the adequacy of its charter and recommends any proposed changes to the Board for its approval.
During 2015,2020, the Audit Committee held sevenfour meetings, including regularly scheduled and special meetings.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Messrs. Malone, Brooks (chair), Beren and HornbakeZibel and Ms. Lody,Krueger, each of whom is “independent” as defined by the listing standards of the NYSE in effect as of the date of this proxy statement.Proxy Statement. The Board has adopted an amended and restated Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, which is available on our website athttp://www.capitalsenior.comwww.sonidaseniorliving.com in the Investor Relations section and is also available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy. Pursuant to its charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:
identifies individuals qualified to become directors;
recommends director nominees to the Board;
develops, and recommends for Board’s approval, our Corporate Governance Guidelines;
reviews with management and assists and advises the Board with respect to resident care and services;
oversees the evaluation of the Board and management; and
conducts an annual review of the adequacy of its charter and recommends any proposed changes to the Board for its approval.
During 2015,2020, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings, including regularly scheduled and special meetings.
Compensation Committee
Composition, Charter and Meetings
The Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Moore, MaloneLieberman (chair) and Reid,Levy and Ms. Krueger, each of whom is “independent” as defined by the listing standards of the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE in effect as of the date of this proxy statement.Proxy Statement. The Board has adopted an amended and restated Compensation Committee Charter, which is available on our website athttp://www.capitalsenior.comwww.sonidaseniorliving.com in the Investor Relations section and is also available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy. Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include, among other things, the responsibility to:
review and approve, on an annual basis, the corporate goals and objectives, and any amendments to those goals and objectives, relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and our other executive officers, evaluate each such individual’s performance in light of such objectives and, either as a committee or together with other independent directors (as directed by the Board), determine and approve the compensation for each such individual based on such evaluation (including base salary, bonus, incentive and equity compensation);
|
review director compensation levels and practices, and recommend, from time to time, changes in such compensation levels and practices;
review our compensation, incentive compensation and equity-based plans and recommend, from time to time, changes in such compensation levels and practices to the Board;
review and discuss with our management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis to be included in our annual proxy statement, annual report on Form 10-K or information statement, as applicable, and make a recommendation as to whether it should be included therein;
conduct an annual review of the adequacy of its charter and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for its approval; and
perform any other activities consistent with our Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaws and governing law as the Compensation Committee or the Board deems appropriate.
During 2015,2020, the Compensation Committee held eightsix meetings, including regularly scheduled and special meetings.
The Compensation Committee’s processes for fulfilling its responsibilitiesRole and duties with respect to executive compensation and the role of our executive officers and management in the compensation process are each described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Overview of Compensation Process” beginning on page 20 of this proxy statement.
In fulfilling its responsibilities and duties with respect to the compensation of our directors, the Compensation Committee periodically reviews the compensation paid to the non-employee directors of the companies in our peer group, and may recommend to the Board adjustments to our director compensation levels and practices so as to remain competitive with the companies in our peer group.
Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee may retain such compensation consultants, outside counsel and other advisors as it may deem appropriate in its sole discretion and it has the sole authority to approve related fees and other retention terms. From time to time, the Compensation Committee has engaged third parties to compile statistical information with respect to the executive compensation practices of other comparable public companies and has retained independent compensation consultants to review the Company’s compensation arrangements for certain of its named executive officers and its independent directors. As described in greater detail in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Consultant,” the Compensation Committee engaged Axiom Talent & Rewards (the “Compensation Consultant”), to review the Company’s 2015 compensation arrangements for certain of its named executive officers and its independent directors, including an analysis of both the competitive market and the design of the compensation arrangements. As part of its reports to the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Consultant evaluated the compensation arrangements of both our self-selected peer group companies and a broader group of industry peer companies selected by the Compensation Consultant, and provided competitive compensation data and analysis relating to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and our independent directors. The fees payable by the Company to the Compensation Consultant for such services were approximately $35,000. The Compensation Committee evaluated the independence of the Compensation Consultant and concluded that the Compensation Consultant was independent and presented no conflict of interest.
Board of Director’s Leadership Structure
Our Board separated the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer by electing James A. Moore, a non-executive, independent director, as Chairman of the Board in 2010. The separation of the roles was implemented to allow Mr. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, to continue to focus his efforts on the successful management of the Company while allowing Mr. Moore, our independent Chairman, to focus his efforts on the continued development of a high-performing Board, including (1) ensuring the Board remains focused on the Company’s long-term strategic plans, (2) working with Company management to ensure the Board continues to receive timely and adequate information, (3) coordinating activities of the committees of the Board, and (4) ensuring effective stakeholder communications. The Board believes, due to the continued leadership and experience provided by these two individuals, that having separate positions is the appropriate leadership structure for the Company at this time and demonstrates our commitment to good corporate governance.
Board of Director’s Role in Risk Oversight
Our Company, like others, faces a variety of enterprise risks, including credit risk, liquidity risk, and operational risk. In fulfilling its risk oversight role, the Board focuses on the adequacy of the Company’s risk management process and overall risk management system. The Board believes an effective risk management system will (1) adequately identify the material risks that the Company faces in a timely manner, (2) implement appropriate risk management strategies that are responsive to the Company’s risk profile and specific material risk exposures, (3) integrate consideration of risk and risk management into business decision-making throughout the Company, and (4) include policies and procedures that adequately transmit necessary information with respect to material risks to senior executives and, as appropriate, to the Board or relevant committee.
The Audit Committee has been designated to take the lead in overseeing risk management at the Board level. Accordingly, the Audit Committee schedules time for periodic reviews of risk management, in addition to its other duties. In this role, the Audit Committee receives information from management and other advisors, and strives to generate serious and thoughtful attention to the Company’s risk management process and system, the nature of the material risks the Company faces, and the adequacy of the Company’s policies and procedures designed to respond to and mitigate these risks.
In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible under its charter for reviewing with management and assisting and advising the Board with respect to resident care and services. This risk management and risk assessment includes management compliance with regulatory requirements related to resident care and services and other related matters, including meeting the Company’s expectations for providing quality care and services to its residents.
Although the Board’s primary risk oversight has been assigned to the Audit Committee, the full Board also periodically receives information about the Company’s risk management system and the most significant risks that the Company faces. This is principally accomplished through the Audit Committee’s discussions with the full Board and summary versions of the briefings provided by management and advisors to the Audit Committee.
In addition to the formal compliance program, the Board and the Audit Committee encourage management to promote a corporate culture that understands risk management and incorporates it into the overall corporate strategy and day-to-day business operations. The Company’s risk management structure also includes an ongoing effort to assess and analyze the most likely areas of future risk for the Company. As a result, the Board and Audit Committee periodically ask the Company’s executives to discuss the most likely sources of material future risks and how the Company is addressing any significant potential vulnerability.
Director Nominations
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible under its charter for identifying and recommending qualified candidates for election to the Board. In addition, stockholders who would like to
recommend a candidate for election to the Board may submit the recommendation to the chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in care of David R. Brickman, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Any recommendation must include name, contact information, background, experience and other pertinent information on the proposed candidate and must be received in writing by November 15, 2016 for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for the 2017 annual meeting of our stockholders.
Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is willing to consider candidates recommended by our stockholders, it has not adopted a formal policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by our stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that a formal policy is not necessary or appropriate because of the small size of the Board and because the current Board already has a diversity of business background and industry experience.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have specific minimum qualifications that must be met by a candidate for election to the Board in order to be considered for nomination by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In identifying and evaluating nominees for director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers each candidate’s qualities, experience, background and skills, as well as any other factors that the candidate may be able to bring to the Board. The process is the same whether the candidate is recommended by a stockholder, another director, management or otherwise. Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal diversity policy in place for the director nomination process, an important factor in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s consideration and assessment of a candidate is the diversity of the candidate’s viewpoints, professional experience, education and skill set. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not pay a fee to any third party for the identification of candidates, but it has paid fees in the past to third parties for background checks on candidates.
With respect to this year’s nominees for director, Mr. Brooks and Mr. Malone currently serve as directors of the Company and Mr. Grier does not currently serve as a director of the Company.
Stockholder Agreement
On March 18, 2016, we entered into an agreement (the “Stockholder Agreement”) with Lucus Advisors LLC, Radix Partners LLC, HCRE Special Investment LLC, Schuster Tanger and Joshua Packwood (collectively, the “Lucus Group”). Under the terms of the Stockholder Agreement, we agreed to identify and nominate a new independent director (the “New Director”) to the Board at the Annual Meeting. We agreed to permit the Lucus Group to propose up to two candidates for inclusion in our New Director selection process and to give due consideration to any such candidate as the Board exercises its discretion in selecting such New Director. The Board has nominated Ed Grier as the New Director.
Pursuant to the Stockholder Agreement, the Lucus Group agreed to certain customary standstill and voting provisions. Among other things, the standstill restricts the Lucus Group from engaging in certain activities, including (without limitation): (i) engaging in certain proxy contest activities, (ii) entering into voting agreements, (iii) seeking to effect any Extraordinary Transactions (as defined in the Stockholder Agreement) or (iv) taking actions in support of: (a) changing or influencing the Board or management, or (b) any material change in the Company’s business, corporate strategy or corporate structure, in each case, until the Expiration Date (as defined in the Stockholder Agreement). The Lucus Group also agreed to vote its shares of common stock in favor of certain of the Board’s proposals at the Annual Meeting, as well as in favor of all nominees recommended by the Board for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting.
The foregoing description of the Stockholder Agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Stockholder Agreement, a copy of which the Company filed with the SEC as Exhibit 99.1 to a Current Report on Form 8-K on March 21, 2016.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics governing all of our employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, our principal accounting officer and corporate controller. A copy of this Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available in the “Corporate Governance Documents” section of the “Investor Relations” section of our website atwww.capitalsenior.comResponsibilities. We intend to make all required disclosures concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, this Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our website.
Website
Our Internet website,www.capitalsenior.com, contains an Investor Relations section, which provides links to our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, SEC stock ownership reports, amendments to those reports and filings, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Director Independence Policy and charters of the Nominating and Corporate Governance, Compensation and Audit Committees of the Board. These documents are available in print, free of charge, to any stockholder who requests a copy as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The materials on our website are not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement and do not form any part of the materials for solicitation of proxies.
Communication with Directors
Correspondence from stockholders and other interested parties may be sent to our directors, including our non-management directors, individually or as a group, in care of James A. Moore, the independent Chairman of our Board, with a copy to David R. Brickman, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, at our principal executive offices, 14160 Dallas Parkway, Suite 300, Dallas, Texas 75254.
All communications received as set forth above will be opened by the Chairman and Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary for the sole purpose of determining whether the contents represent a message to our directors. Appropriate communications other than advertising, promotions of a product or service, or patently offensive material will be forwarded promptly to the addressee.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis focuses on the compensation of our executive officers, including our “named executive officers” who are the individuals included in the Summary Compensation Table on page 38 of this proxy statement. This section summarizes our executive compensation program and objectives and provides an overview of how and why the Compensation Committee, which is responsible for the oversight of our executive compensation program, made specific decisions involving the compensation of our named executive officers. We also refer you to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for additional information regarding our 2015 financial results discussed below.
Executive Summary
Our executive compensation program is designed to meet three principal objectives:
employ, retain and reward executives who are capable of leading us in executing our differentiated business strategy to enhance shareholder value, which includes maximizing the value of our operations, growing our cash flow, preserving a strong financial position, increasing our geographic concentration, maximizing our competitive strengths in each of our markets and capitalizing on near and long-term growth opportunities;
a significant amount of total compensation should be in the form of short-term and long-term incentive awards to align compensation with our financial and operational performance goals as well as individual performance goals; and
incentive awards should be tied to and vary with our financial and operational performance as well individual performance.
We believe these objectives collectively link compensation to overall Company performance and directly link compensation to the objectives set forth in our 2015 business plan that was developed with our Board of Directors. These objectives help ensure that the interests of our named executive officers are closely aligned with the interests of our shareholders. We believe that Capital Senior Living has successfully achieved these objectives as demonstrated by our strong financial results during 2015, which exceeded our business plan targets. As described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our fiscal 2015 financial results, based upon various measures, increased significantly relative to our fiscal 2014 financial results. The following table highlights the year-over-year comparison of some of the key financial metrics that the Compensation Committee uses in evaluating our performance for purposes of making compensation decisions.
Performance Measures | Fiscal Year 2015 | Fiscal Year 2014 | % Increase | |||||
Revenue | $412.2 million | $383.9 million | 7.4 | % | ||||
Adjusted EBITDAR | $144.5 million | $132.6 million | 9.0 | % | ||||
Adjusted EBITDAR Margin | 36.6% | 35.9% | 1.9 | % | ||||
Adjusted CFFO | $47.0 million | $40.9 million | 14.9 | %(1) | ||||
Adjusted CFFO per Share | $1.64 per share | $1.45 per share | 13.1 | %(1) |
The above table utilizes non-GAAP financial measures such as adjusted CFFO, adjusted CFFO per share, adjusted EBITDAR and adjusted EBITDAR margin. We believe these non-GAAP measures are useful in identifying trends in day-to-day performance because they exclude items that are of little or no significance to operations and provide indicators to management of progress in achieving optimal operating performance. In
addition, these non-GAAP measures are used by many research analysts and investors to evaluate the performance and valuations of companies in our industry. Please refer to Appendix A to this proxy statement for important information concerning such non-GAAP financial measures, including a reconciliation of such measures to GAAP.
For fiscal 2015, we believe our compensation programs, which are designed to reward our named executive officers for the achievement of short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals and the achievement of increased shareholder value, delivered payments commensurate with our strong financial performance. Below are the highlights of our executive compensation program for 2015.
|
For 2015, a significant portion of the total compensation opportunity available to our named executive officers who were eligible to participate in our Incentive Compensation Plan was linked to the achievement of certain corporate and individual goals. As discussed in more detail below, in 2015 our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer were eligible to receive incentive bonuses of up to a maximum of 150%, 105% and 90%, respectively, of their base salaries for 2015, subject to the achievement of various performance criteria under our Incentive Compensation Plan for 2015.
Adjusted CFFO per share and adjusted EBITDAR were the key performance metrics for corporate goals under our Incentive Compensation Plan for 2015. We believe these metrics provide for a balanced approach to measuring annual Company performance. In addition, these measures are used by many research analysts and investors to evaluate the performance and valuations of companies in our industry. Another performance metric for corporate goals under our Incentive Compensation Plan for 2015 was the aggregate transaction value of the senior housing communities we acquired during such year. This performance metric was designed to reward our eligible named executive officers for their efforts in helping us identify and complete such strategic acquisitions, which we expect will increase our ownership of high-quality senior living communities in geographically concentrated regions and generate meaningful increases in our CFFO and earnings, and accordingly, increase shareholder value.
Another way that we try to link compensation and performance is through periodically granting performance-based equity awards to our named executive officers. During 2015, we granted 50,000, 40,000, 25,000 and 15,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock to our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, respectively. The periodic vesting of these awards is subject to our achievement of certain performance targets over a three-year period, which is primarily designed to encourage our named executive officers to focus on our long-term performance.
|
|
|
|
2015 “Say-on-Pay” Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
We provided our stockholders with a “say on pay” advisory vote in 2015 on our executive compensation pursuant Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. At our 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our stockholders expressed overwhelming support for the compensation of our named executive officers, with approximately 98.8% of the votes cast for the approval of the “say on pay” advisory vote on executive compensation (assuming abstentions and broker non-votes do not constitute votes “cast”). In evaluating our executive compensation programs, the Compensation Committee considered the results of the 2015 advisory vote along with the many other factors discussed in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, including the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the interaction of our compensation programs with our corporate business objectives, input received from our senior management, the analysis, reports and recommendations of the Compensation Consultant, and the Compensation Committee’s own judgment. While each of these factors impacted the Compensation Committee’s decisions regarding our named executive officers’ compensation, the Compensation Committee did not make any changes to our executive compensation program and policies as a result of the 2015 “say on pay” advisory vote.
Overview of Compensation Process
The Compensation Committee is ultimately responsible for reviewing and approving the base salary increases (other than annual base salary increases contemplated by existing employment agreements) and bonus levels of our executive officers, including our named executive officers, evaluating the performance of such executives and reviewing any related matters. Equity and other forms of compensation for our executive officers, including our named executive officers, are also considered by the Compensation Committee. In applying the above-described objectives forconsidering and determining our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee primarily relies upon the following factors:
Input Received from our Senior Management. As discussed in greater detail below, the Compensation Committee has historically relied in part upon the input and recommendations of our senior management, which currently consists of Messrs. Cohen, Johannessen and Hendrickson and whom we refer to in this section as our
• |
Peer Group Data. The Compensation Committee has consistently sought to structure our executive compensation program to provide amounts and forms of compensation to our |
• | Third Party Industry Surveys and Compensation Consultants. As part of its ongoing efforts to provide independent oversight and review of our executive compensation programs, the Compensation Committee periodically reviews information compiled by third parties with respect to the executive compensation practices of other companies in our industry. The Compensation Committee reviews such information for purposes of obtaining a general understanding of current compensation practices of companies in our peer group and
|
• | Other Factors. |
• | Role of Management. The Compensation Committee has |
officers, the
|
In fulfilling its responsibilities and duties with respect to the compensation of our directors, the Compensation Committee periodically reviews the compensation paid to the non-employee directors of the companies in our peer group, and may recommend to the Board adjustments to our director compensation levels and practices so as to remain competitive with the companies in our peer group.
Role of Independent Compensation Consultant
Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee may retain such compensation consultants, outside counsel and other advisors as it may deem appropriate in its sole discretion and it has the sole authority to approve related fees and other retention terms. From time to time, the Compensation Committee has engaged third parties to compile statistical information with respect to the executive compensation practices of other comparable public companies and has retained independent compensation consultants to review the Company’s compensation arrangements for certain of its named executive officers and its independent directors.
The Compensation Committee engaged Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) as its independent consultant to review the Company’s 2020 compensation arrangements for certain of its executive officers and its independent directors, including an analysis of both the competitive market and the design of the compensation arrangements. Meridian also assisted the Compensation Committee with a variety of matters, including the design of the annual and long-term incentive program and its impact on officer retention, and an annual risk assessment of our compensation policies and practices applicable to our executive officers and other employees. Meridian reported its findings to the Compensation Committee to help inform the Compensation Committee’s decision-making on executive officer compensation for 2020. The Compensation Committee recognizes that it is essential to receive objective advice from its external advisors. Consequently, the Compensation Committee is solely responsible for retaining and terminating its consultants, Meridian reported directly to the Compensation Committee, and Meridian did not provide any other services to the Company during fiscal 2020.
The fees payable by the Company to Meridian for its services as of December 31, 2020 were approximately $85,100. The Compensation Committee evaluated the independence of Meridian and concluded that Meridian was independent and presented no conflict of interest.
Board of Directors’ Leadership Structure
In 2010, our Board separated the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer by electing a non-executive, independent director as Chairman of the Board. Since November 2021, Mr. Johnson has served as non-executive Chairman of the Board. The separation of the roles was implemented to allow our Chief Executive Officer to continue to focus his or her efforts on the successful management of the Company while allowing our independent Chairman to focus his efforts on the continued development of a high-performing Board, including (1) ensuring the Board remains focused on the Company’s long-term strategic plans, (2) working with Company management to ensure the Board continues to receive timely and adequate information, (3) coordinating activities of the committees of the Board, and (4) ensuring effective stakeholder communications. The Board believes, due to the continued leadership and experience provided by these two individuals, that having separate positions is the appropriate leadership structure for the Company at this time and demonstrates our commitment to good corporate governance.
Board of Directors’ Role in Risk Oversight
Our Company, like others, faces a variety of enterprise risks, including credit risk, liquidity risk, and operational risk. In fulfilling its risk oversight role, the Board focuses on the adequacy of the Company’s risk
management process and overall risk management system. The Board believes an effective risk management system will (1) adequately identify the material risks that the Company faces in a timely manner, (2) implement appropriate risk management strategies that are responsive to the Company’s risk profile and specific material risk exposures, (3) integrate consideration of risk and risk management into business decision-making throughout the Company, and (4) include policies and procedures that adequately transmit necessary information with respect to material risks to senior executives and, as appropriate, to the Board or relevant committee.
The Audit Committee has been designated to take the lead in overseeing risk management at the Board level. Accordingly, the Audit Committee schedules time for periodic reviews of risk management, in addition to its other duties. In this role, the Audit Committee receives information from management and other advisors, and strives to generate serious and thoughtful attention to the Company’s risk management process and system, the nature of the material risks the Company faces, and the adequacy of the Company’s policies and procedures designed to respond to and mitigate these risks.
In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible under its charter for reviewing with management and assisting and advising the Board with respect to resident care and services. This risk management and risk assessment includes management compliance with regulatory requirements related to resident care and services and other related matters, including meeting the Company’s expectations for providing quality care and services to its residents.
Although the Board’s primary risk oversight has been assigned to the Audit Committee, the full Board also periodically receives information about the Company’s risk management system and the most significant risks that the Company faces. This is principally accomplished through the Audit Committee’s discussions with the full Board and summary versions of the briefings provided by management and advisors to the Audit Committee.
In addition to the formal compliance program, the Board and the Audit Committee encourage management to promote a corporate culture that understands risk management and incorporates it into the overall corporate strategy and day-to-day business operations. The Company’s risk management structure also includes an ongoing effort to assess and analyze the most likely areas of future risk for the Company. As a result, the Board and Audit Committee periodically ask the Company’s executives to discuss the most likely sources of material future risks and how the Company is addressing any significant potential vulnerability.
Director Nominations
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible under its charter for identifying and recommending qualified candidates for election to the Board. In addition, stockholders who would like to recommend a candidate for election to the Board may submit the recommendation to the chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in care of David R. Brickman, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Any recommendation must include name, contact information, background, experience and other pertinent information on the proposed candidate and must be received in writing by November 15th of a calendar year for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for the annual meeting of our stockholders in the immediately following calendar year.
Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is willing to consider candidates recommended by our stockholders, it has not adopted a formal policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by our stockholders. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that a formal policy is not necessary or appropriate because of the small size of the Board and because the current Board already has a diversity of business background and industry experience.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have specific minimum qualifications that must be met by a candidate for election to the Board in order to be considered for nomination by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. In identifying and evaluating nominees for director, the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee considers each candidate’s qualities, experience, background and skills, as well as any other factors that the candidate may be able to bring to the Board. The process is the same whether the candidate is recommended by a stockholder, another director, management or otherwise. Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal diversity policy in place for the director nomination process, an important factor in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s consideration and assessment of a candidate is the diversity of the candidate’s viewpoints, professional experience, education and skill set. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not pay a fee to any third party for the identification of candidates, but it has paid fees in the past to third parties for background checks on candidates.
With respect to this year’s nominees for director, Ms. Krueger and Messrs. Harris and Johnson currently serve as directors of the Company.
Conversant Transactions and Investor Rights Agreement
On November 3, 2021, the Company completed certain transactions pursuant to which the Company raised approximately $154.8 million through (1) a private placement issuance to the Conversant Investors of an aggregate of (i) 41,250 shares of the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock; (ii) 1,650,000 shares of the Company’s common stock; and (iii) 1,031,250 warrants to purchase one share of common stock of the Company per warrant (the “Private Placement”), and (2) a common stock rights offering (the “Rights Offering”) to the Company’s existing stockholders, pursuant to which such stockholders purchased an additional 1,133,941 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Conversant Investors participated in backstopping the Rights Offering, pursuant to which they purchased an additional 1,160,806 shares of the Company’s common stock, and received a backstop fee of 174,675 shares of the Company’s common stock. Following such transactions, as of November 30, 2021, the Conversant Investors beneficially owned approximately 57.8% of the Company’s common stock on a fully-diluted basis (see “Principal Stockholders and Stock Ownership of Management” above). Based solely on a Schedule 13D filed on November 12, 2021 by the Conversant Investors and certain of their affiliates, of the aggregate purchase price of $117,324,180 in the Private Placement and the Rights Offering, $101,304,635 was paid in cash from funds contributed by certain limited partners of an affiliate of the Conversant Investors, and $16,019,545 was paid by cancellation of the amounts outstanding under that certain Issuer Promissory Note, dated July 22, 2021, issued by the Company to the Conversant Investors in connection with entering into an investment agreement relating to the Private Placement (the loan represented thereby having been funded in cash from funds contributed by certain limited partners of an affiliate of the Conversant Investors at the time it was made).
On November 3, 2021, in connection with the closing of such transactions we entered into the Investor Rights Agreement with Conversant and Silk, which Investor Rights Agreement pertains to, among other things, the appointment of (i) a certain number of directors nominated by Conversant Fund A (“Conversant Representatives”) to the Board based upon the ownership percentage in the Company of Conversant and its affiliates and permitted transferees, and (ii) two directors nominated by Silk (the “Silk Representatives”) for so long as Silk and its affiliates beneficially own at least five percent of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company on an as-converted basis. Additionally, pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, for so long as Conversant and its affiliates and permitted transferees collectively satisfy a certain percentage of beneficial ownership in the Company, Conversant Fund A will be entitled to designate the chairperson of the Board. Accordingly, on November 3, 2021, Ed. A Grier, Dr. E. Rodney Hornbake, Ross B. Levin, Steven T. Plochocki and Michael W. Reid resigned from the Board and Messrs. Harris, Johnson, Levy and Zibel, as Conversant Representatives, and Messrs. Beren and Lieberman, as Silk Representatives, were appointed to the Board to serve until the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2021, 2022 or 2023, as applicable (as described above in “Election of Directors—Nominees and Continuing Directors”), and Mr. Johnson replaced Mr. Reid as the Chairman of the Board.
Pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement, Conversant agreed to certain standstill provisions. Among other things, and subject to certain exceptions, the standstill prevents Conversant from: (i) engaging in certain proxy contest activities, (ii) acquiring any securities of the Company, or (iii) taking any actions to change the composition of the Board (other than in respect of Conversant Representatives), in each case, for a period of 18 months from the date of the Investor Rights Agreement.
The foregoing description of the Investor Rights Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Investor Rights Agreement, a copy of which the Company filed with the SEC as Exhibit 10.1 to a Current Report on Form 8-K on November 4, 2021.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics governing all of our employees, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, our principal accounting officer and corporate controller. A copy of this Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available in the “Corporate Governance Documents” section of the “Investor Relations” section of our website at www.sonidaseniorliving.com. We intend to make all required disclosures concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, this Code of Business Conduct and Ethics on our website.
Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policies
As part of our Policy on Insider Trading, directors, officers and employees are prohibited from engaging in hedging transactions with respect to our securities. In addition, directors, officers and other employees are prohibited from holding our securities in a margin account and are also prohibited from pledging our securities as collateral for a loan unless such pledging has been disclosed to, and pre-approved by, the Board.
Website
Our Internet website, www.sonidaseniorliving.com, contains an Investor Relations section, which provides links to our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, SEC stock ownership reports, amendments to those reports and filings, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Director Independence Policy and charters of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Compensation Committee and Audit Committee of the Board. These documents are available in print, free of charge, to any stockholder who requests a copy as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The materials on our website are not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement and do not form any part of the materials for solicitation of proxies.
Communication with Directors
Correspondence from stockholders and other interested parties may be sent to our directors, including our non-management directors, individually or as a group, in care of David W. Johnson, the Chairman of our Board, with a copy to David R. Brickman, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, at our principal executive offices, 16301 Quorum Drive, Suite 160A, Addison, Texas 75001.
All communications received as set forth above will be opened by the Chairman and Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary for the sole purpose of determining whether the contents represent a message to our directors. Appropriate communications other than advertising, promotions of a product or service, or patently offensive material will be forwarded promptly to the addressee.
The following table sets forth certain information concerning each of the Company’s executive officers, other than Ms. Lody. Information concerning Ms. Lody is set forth above under “Election of Directors—Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2023 Annual Meeting.”
Name | Age | Position(s) with the Company | ||||
Brandon M. Ribar | 41 | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | ||||
David R. Brickman | 63 | Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel | ||||
Tiffany L. Dutton | 42 | Senior Vice President—Finance and Accounting | ||||
Jeremy D. Falke | 48 | Senior Vice President—Human Resources | ||||
Michael C. Fryar | 45 | Senior Vice President and Chief Revenue Officer | ||||
Carole J. Burnell | 53 | Vice President—Operations |
Brandon M. Ribar joined the Company in September 2019 and is currently the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Ribar served as an executive healthcare consultant primarily focused on improving existing operations and expanding continuing care retirement communities for multiple investment platforms and operators since 2018. From 2014 through 2018, he served as the Senior Vice President, Operations of Golden Living, a post-acute healthcare provider. Prior to serving in such capacity, Mr. Ribar served Golden Living in various roles including Senior Vice President, Operational Finance and Strategy and Senior Vice President, Corporate Strategy and Business Development. Prior to Golden Living, Mr. Ribar served as Vice President of Fillmore Capital Partners from 2004 through 2009. Mr. Ribar received a BCS in Operations and Management Information Systems from Santa Clara University.
David R. Brickman is currently the Senior Vice President, Secretary, and General Counsel of the Company. He served as Vice President and General Counsel of the Company and its predecessors since July 1992 and has served as Secretary of the Company since May 2007. From 1989 to 1992, Mr. Brickman served as in-house counsel with LifeCo Travel Management Company, a corporation that provided travel services to U.S. corporations. Mr. Brickman earned a Juris Doctor and Masters of Business Administration from the University of South Carolina and a Masters in Health Administration from Duke University. He currently serves on the Board of Advisors for the Southern Methodist University Corporate Counsel Symposium. He is also a member of the National Center for Assisted Living In-house Counsel Roundtable Task Force, as well as the Long-Term Care Risk Legal Forum. Mr. Brickman has either practiced law or performed in-house counsel functions for 33 years.
Tiffany L. Dutton, a Certified Public Accountant, has served as the Company’s Senior Vice President—Finance and Accounting since December 2020. Ms. Dutton joined the Company in January 2020 as its Vice President—Accounting and Financial Reporting. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Dutton served as an accounting consultant primarily focused on assisting healthcare and retail entities with improving financial reporting and accounting structures since 2017. Prior to such time, Ms. Dutton served as the Director—Accounting Policy in 2017 and Assistant Controller—Operations from 2014 to 2017 for Adeptus Health, Inc, Senior Manager—Financial Reporting for RealPage, Inc. from 2013 to 2014, as Manager, Accounting, Reporting and Compliance for Pier 1 Imports from 2010 to 2013, and as Senior Manager of Accounting Policy of Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group from 2008 to 2010. She began her career as a Manager in the assurance and advisory business services practice of Ernst & Young LLP. Ms. Dutton earned a BBA in Accounting and a BBA in Economics and Finance from the University of Oklahoma and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Jeremy D. Falke joined the Company as Senior Vice President—Human Resources in February 2018. Mr. Falke held various positions within Tenet Healthcare Corporation (“Tenet”) from November 2004 to February 2018, serving most recently as the Vice President, Talent, Culture and Performance Systems in Dallas. In this role, he was responsible for all talent planning, development, and cultural programming and transformation for an organization with over 75 acute-care hospitals and 450 outpatient facilities, employing
more than 125,000 people. Prior to this role, Mr. Falke served as the Senior Director, Strategic Operations, Analytics and Reporting in Dallas and as the Chief Human Resources Officer for Creighton University Medical Center, which was then owned by Tenet in Omaha, Nebraska. Mr. Falke received a Bachelor of Science in Business Management from University of Phoenix in Scottsdale, and a Masters of Business Administration with a concentration in Healthcare Management from the University of Nebraska in Omaha.
Michael C. Fryar joined the Company as Chief Revenue Officer in February 2019. His 20 years of experience focusing on brands in complex, multi-channel environments includes leadership positions in medical device and marketing agency settings, with the majority of his career focused in senior healthcare. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Fryar served as Vice President of GN Hearing North America, where he was part of a leadership team responsible for seven consecutive years of above-market growth and expansion across multiple channels and brands. Prior to GN Hearing, Mr. Fryar served as Senior Director, Marketing at Starkey Hearing Technologies from 2006 to 2012. From 1998 to 2006, he served as an account director at marketing agency Colle McVoy, specializing in digital and traditional marketing, advertising and public relations. Mr. Fryar received a BA in Communications Studies with a minor in Economics Management from Gustavus Adolphus College.
Carole J. Burnell is currently the Vice President—Operations of the Company. She served as the Regional Operations Manager in the Dallas Region of the Company from January 2004 to March 2019. Ms. Burnell has over 22 years of senior living industry experience and has held a variety of leadership roles during that time. She started her career as an Executive Director with Assisted Living Concepts, and has since served in both large publicly traded and small privately held senior living companies with multi-community oversight responsibilities. She earned a BBA degree with a concentration in Accounting from West Texas A&M University.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the compensation earned by our named executive officers in 2020 and 2019, except that Mr. Ribar was not one of our named executive officers for 2019, and accordingly, information with respect to Mr. Ribar for such year is not provided. Carey P. Hendrickson resigned as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective November 6, 2020 to pursue other career opportunities. Mr. Hendrickson’s departure was not based on any disagreement with the Company on any matter.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus | Stock Awards(1) | Option Awards(1) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2) | All Other Compensation(3) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kimberly S. Lody, | 2020 | $ | 725,000 | $ | 362,500 | (4) | — | — | $ | 299,063 | $ | 3,457 | $ | 1,390,020 | ||||||||||||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | 2019 | $ | 714,310 | — | $ | 1,381,111 | $ | 438,772 | $ | 398,750 | $ | 1,007,250 | $ | 3,940,193 | ||||||||||||||||||
Brandon M. Ribar, | 2020 | $ | 400,000 | $ | 200,000 | (4) | — | — | $ | 63,000 | — | $ | 663,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carey P. Hendrickson, | 2020 | $ | 381,616 | $ | 510,908 | (4) | — | — | — | $ | 47,585 | $ | 940,109 | |||||||||||||||||||
Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 2019 | $ | 438,746 | $ | 142,881 | $ | 388,355 | — | $ | 61,107 | $ | 5,888 | $ | 1,036,977 | ||||||||||||||||||
David R. Brickman, | 2020 | $ | 341,161 | $ | 394,676 | (4) | — | — | $ | 57,591 | $ | 5,170 | $ | 798,598 | ||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | 2019 | $ | 341,161 | $ | 110,375 | $ | 212,707 | — | $ | 35,253 | $ | 4,951 | $ | 704,447 |
(1) | Amounts for 2019 reflect the grant date fair value of the respective equity awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (“ASC 718”), including, with respect to performance-based shares, the |
In March 2020, in response to then-current economic conditions and to avoid the excessive share use, run rate and dilution that would occur by awarding equity-based long-term incentives at the Company’s then-current stock price, the Compensation Committee recommended that the Board approve, and the Board subsequently approved, a temporary suspension of equity awards to any officer of the Company. Accordingly, no equity awards were granted to the Company’s named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
(2) | Amounts in this column for 2020 reflect the cash performance incentive received by Ms. Lody and Messrs. Ribar, Brickman and Hendrickson under our Management by Objective Incentive Plan for fiscal 2020. See “—Retention Bonuses and MBO Incentive Plan—MBO Incentive Plan” below for additional information. |
(3) | The amounts in this column for 2020 reflect annual contributions or other allocations by us to our 401(k) plan
|
(4) | The amounts in this column for 2020 reflect the |
Hendrickson include the
|
Employment Agreements
Kimberly S. Lody
We entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Lody in January 2019. Pursuant to Ms. Lody’s employment agreement, Ms. Lody will serve as our President and discussions with research analysts covering our industry and our stockholders as to the most appropriate measures for measuring the performance and valuations of companies in our industry. In 2015, the Compensation Committee also reviewed the market analysis and reports of the Compensation Consultant described above in determining the corporate and individual performance metrics under our Incentive Compensation Plan. During 2015, the Compensation Committee met twice during which it considered the most appropriate performance targets for the 2015 fiscal year.
Corporate Goals. Of the performance bonus amount that an eligible named executive officer may earn pursuant to the Incentive Compensation Plan, a pre-determined percentage of that amount is typically contingent upon our achievement of certain objectively verifiable measures of our performance for the applicable year. These corporate goals are typically approved by the Compensation Committee in the first quarter of each fiscal year based upon the recommendations of our senior management regarding certain initiatives and the related corresponding metrics that our senior management believes are directly related to the achievement of our business plan for that year. Typically, two or three distinct corporate goals are established, and of the percentage of the performance bonus amount that is contingent upon the achievement of such corporate goals, varying percentages of such amount are allocated by the Compensation Committee to each corporate goal.
Under the Incentive Compensation Plan for 2015, our Chief Executive Officer until December 31, 2021, unless terminated earlier pursuant to the termination provisions therein. The term of Ms. Lody’s employment will automatically renew for additional one-year periods in the event that we do not, or Ms. Lody does not, provide written notice to the other party of their intent not to renew such term at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the then-current term. Ms. Lody’s employment agreement provides that our Board of Directors will nominate Ms. Lody for reelection to the Board at the expiration of each term of office, and that Ms. Lody will serve as a member of our Board for each period for which she is so elected.
Pursuant to Ms. Lody’s employment agreement, she will receive an annual base salary of not less than $725,000 and will be eligible to receive an annual performance bonus targeted at 110% of Ms. Lody’s base salary; provided, that (i) for the year ending December 31, 2019, Ms. Lody was entitled to receive an annual performance bonus equal to at least 50% of the full targeted performance bonus, and (ii) Ms. Lody’s targeted performance bonus may be increased from time to time by our Board or the Compensation Committee. Under her employment agreement, Ms. Lody also received a sign-on cash award of $1,000,000 and the following equity awards: (i) a non-qualified stock option to purchase 9,816 shares of our common stock with a ten-year term, which option is scheduled to vest in installments of 33%, 33% and 34% on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, respectively; (ii) 9,816 shares of performance-based restricted stock (which were subsequently converted into time-based restricted stock in connection with the closing of the Conversant transactions); and (iii) 4,908 shares of time-based restricted stock, which are scheduled to vest in installments of 33%, 33% and 34% on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date, respectively. Beginning with fiscal year 2020, Ms. Lody became eligible to receive equity awards under our annual equity incentive award program in effect for our other senior executives, as determined by the Compensation Committee. Ms. Lody’s employment agreement also entitles her to certain severance payments and benefits in the event she is terminated by us without “Cause” or by Ms. Lody for “Good Reason” (including in connection with a “Change in Control”), as described more fully in Ms. Lody’s employment agreement.
The foregoing description of Ms. Lody’s employment agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the reference to the full text of Ms. Lody’s employment agreement, which is included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 8, 2019..
Brandon M. Ribar
We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Ribar in September 2019. Pursuant to Mr. Ribar’s employment agreement, Mr. Ribar will serve as our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Ribar’s employment agreement was for an initial term of one year and is subject to extension by the mutual written consent of the Company and Mr. Ribar.
Pursuant to Mr. Ribar’s employment agreement, he will receive an annual base salary of not less than $400,000 and will be eligible to receive a performance bonus as determined by the Compensation Committee. Under his employment agreement, Mr. Ribar also received the following equity awards: (i) 3,000 shares of performance-based restricted stock (which were subsequently converted into time-based restricted stock in connection with the closing of the Conversant transactions); and (ii) 1,667 shares of time-based restricted stock, which are scheduled to vest in installments of 33%, 33% and 34% on the first, second and third anniversaries of
the grant date, respectively. Mr. Ribar’s employment agreement also entitles him to certain severance payments and benefits in the event he is terminated by us without “Cause” or by Mr. Ribar for “Good Reason” (including in connection with a “Fundamental Change”), as described more fully in Mr. Ribar’s employment agreement.
The foregoing description of Mr. Ribar’s employment agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the reference to the full text of Mr. Ribar’s employment agreement, which is included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 10, 2019.
David R. Brickman
On March 26, 2021, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Brickman that terminated and replaced his then-existing employment agreement. Mr. Brickman’s employment agreement provides that we will continue to employ Mr. Brickman on an at-will basis as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Mr. Brickman will receive an annual base salary of not less than $335,000 and will be eligible to receive an annual performance bonus targeted at not less than 50% of his base salary. Mr. Brickman’s employment agreement also entitles him to certain severance payments and benefits in the event he is terminated by us without “Cause” or by Mr. Brickman for “Good Reason” (including in connection with a “Change in Control”), as described more fully in Mr. Brickman’s employment agreement.
The foregoing description of Mr. Brickman’s employment agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the reference to the full text of Mr. Brickman’s employment agreement, which is included as Exhibit 10.28 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2021.
Carey P. Hendrickson
We previously entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Hendrickson pursuant to which he served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer until his resignation effective November 6, 2020 to pursue other career opportunities. Mr. Hendrickson’s departure was not based on any disagreement with the Company on any matter.
Mr. Hendrickson’s employment was terminated by Mr. Hendrickson without “Good Reason” (as such term is defined in Mr. Hendrickson’s employment agreement). Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of Mr. Hendrickson’s employment agreement, the only payments and benefits that he was entitled to receive from us were (i) payment for all accrued but unpaid base salary as of the date of termination, (ii) reimbursement for reasonable and necessary business expenses incurred through the date of termination, and (iii) any earned benefits under our employee benefit plans. All unvested awards were forfeited by Mr. Hendrickson effective upon termination of his employment.
The foregoing description of Mr. Hendrickson’s employment agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by the reference to the full text of Mr. Hendrickson’s employment agreement, which is included as Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2020.
Retention Bonuses and MBO Incentive Plan
Retention Bonuses
On the recommendation of the Compensation Committee on March 24, 2020 in light of then-current economic conditions, the Board approved a temporary suspension of equity awards to any director or officer of the Company. The Compensation Committee also determined that it would not increase the annual base salaries of the Company’s executive officers for fiscal 2020.
In consideration of such matters and for retention purposes, on March 24, 2020 the Compensation Committee approved retention awards (the “Retention Awards”) to the Company’s named executive officers and certain other executive officers (each, a “Participant”) equal to 100% of the Participant’s then-current base salary. 50% of the Retention Award was subject to the Participant’s continued employment with the Company through September 15, 2020, and the remaining 50% of the Retention Award was subject to the Participant’s continued employment with the Company through March 15, 2021. If the Participant did not remain continuously employed with the Company through such dates, then the portion of the Retention Award subject to continuous employment as of such date would be forfeited, except that, if any Participant’s employment is terminated (i) by the Company without “Cause” (and other than due to the Participant’s death or “Disability”), or (ii) upon or following a “Change in Control” (each such term as defined in the Company’s equity incentive plan), in each case, prior to March 15, 2021, then the full amount of the Retention Award would be paid to such Participant.
MBO Incentive Plan
In addition, on March 24, 2020, the Compensation Committee approved a Management by Objective Incentive Plan for fiscal 2020 (the “MBO Incentive Plan”) pursuant to which each Participant had the opportunity to earn a cash performance bonus equal to 30% of such Participant’s targeted performance bonus for fiscal 2020 (the “MBO Incentive”). Pursuant to the terms of their respective employment agreements, the “targeted performance bonus” for the Company’s President and CEO, former Executive Vice President and CFO, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, who are the Company’s named executive officers, was equal to 110%, 70%, 70% and 50%, respectively, of their annual base salary for fiscal 2020. The payment of the MBO Incentive was based on the Participant’s achievement of certain individual goals for fiscal 2020 that were within such Participant’s sphere of influence, as determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Achievement of the threshold level of performance for each individual goal would result in 50% of the portion of MBO Incentive subject to such individual goal being earned by the Participant, and achievement of the maximum level of performance for each individual goal would result in 150% of the portion of the MBO Incentive subject to such individual goal being earned by the Participant, in each case, subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee.
Performance Goals
The table below shows the individual performance goals for our named executive officers under our MBO Incentive Plan for 2020 and the Compensation Committee’s determination as to whether such goals were achieved. Based upon each named executive officer’s achievement of his or her individual goals, the Compensation Committee had discretion to award between 0% and 150% of the target cash bonus to such named executive officer. As Mr. Hendrickson resigned as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective November 6, 2020 to pursue other career opportunities, he forfeited his MBO Incentive.
Executive |
Individual Performance Goal |
Weight |
Achievement |
Payout Factor | ||||
Kimberly S. Lody | Attain specific year-end cash balance(1) | 16.5% | Target | 100% | ||||
Achieve certain capital structure initiatives(2) | 16.5% | Maximum | 150% | |||||
Brandon M. Ribar | Attain specific year-end cash balance(1) | 5.25% | Target | 100% | ||||
Centralize accounts payable(3) | 5.25% | No | 0% | |||||
Implementation of memory care program(4) | 5.25% | Threshold | 50% | |||||
Establish and implement resident sales process(5) | 5.25% | Maximum | 150% | |||||
David R. Brickman | Attain specific year-end cash balance(1) | 3.75% | Target | 100% | ||||
Achieve certain capital structure initiatives(2) | 3.75% | Maximum | 150% | |||||
Develop risk management training materials and conduct training for all communities(6) | 3.75% | Target | 100% | |||||
Update and standardize resident agreements and lease process(7)
| 3.75% | Target | 100% |
(1) | With respect to this individual performance goal, the threshold level of performance was subject to the Company having a cash balance of at least $8 million as of December 31, 2020, which would result in a payout equal to 50% of the targeted amount. In the event that the Company’s cash balance was at least $12 million as of December 31, 2020, then the targeted level of performance would be attained, which would result in a payout equal to 100% of the targeted amount. In the event that the Company’s cash balance was at least $25 million as of December 31, 2020, then the maximum level of performance would be attained, which would result in a payout equal to 150% of the targeted amount. As the Company’s cash balance as of December 31, 2020 was approximately $14 million, the targeted level of performance was achieved for this performance goal. As a result, the payout factor for this individual performance goal was 100%. |
(2) | With respect to this individual performance goal, the threshold, target and maximum levels of performance was subject to the Company achieving certain capital structure initiatives during the year ended December 31, 2020 as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. Achievement of the threshold level of performance would result in a payout equal to 50% of the targeted amount, achievement of the target level of performance would result in a payout equal to 100% of the targeted amount, and achievement of the maximum level of performance would result in a payout equal to 150% of the targeted amount. During fiscal 2020, as the Company exited all triple net leases and certain underperforming communities, removed approximately $470 million of debt from its balance sheet, improved cash flow by approximately $32 million compared to fiscal 2019, and completed certain other capital structure initiatives, the Compensation Committee exercised its discretion and determined that the maximum level of performance was achieved for this performance goal. As a result, the payout factor for this individual performance goal was 150%. |
(3) | With respect to this individual performance goal, the threshold level of performance was subject to selecting and implementing a process for centralizing the Company’s accounts payable system by December 31, 2020, which would result in a payout equal to 50% of the targeted amount. In the event that such selection and implementation was completed by October 31, 2020, then the targeted level of performance would be attained, which would result in a payout equal to 100% of the targeted amount. In the event that such selection and implementation was completed by August 30, 2020, then the maximum level of performance would be attained, which would result in a payout equal to 150% of the targeted amount. As such selection and implementation was not completed during fiscal 2020 due to certain delays caused by process and system challenges, the threshold level of performance was not achieved for this performance goal. As a result, the payout factor for this individual performance goal was 0%. |
(4) | With respect to this individual performance goal, the threshold level of performance was subject to preparing a detailed memory care program implementation plan, rolling out such plan to five communities and achieving certain monthly operating targets by December 31, 2020, which would result in a payout equal to 50% of the targeted amount. In the event that such plan was prepared and rolled out to 10 communities and such monthly operating targets were achieved by December 31, 2020, then the targeted level of performance would be attained, which would result in a payout equal to 100% of the targeted amount. In the event that such plan was prepared and rolled out to 20 communities and such monthly operating targets were achieved by December 31, 2020, then the maximum level of performance would be attained, which would result in a payout equal to 150% of the targeted amount. As such plan was prepared and rolled out to five communities and such monthly operating targets were achieved by December 31, 2020, the threshold level of performance was achieved for this performance goal. As a result, the payout factor for this individual performance goal was 50%. |
(5) | With respect to this individual performance goal, the threshold level of performance was subject to establishing baseline lead, tour and conversion metrics for all communities, at least 30 communities receiving hands-on daily sales coaching and support, and improving conversion by 10% of A Place for Mom (“APFM”) leads by August 30, 2020, which would result in a payout equal to 50% of the targeted amount. In the event that at least 30 communities received hands-on daily sales coaching and support, the Company improved conversion by 15% of APFM leads by September 1, 2020, and speed to lead improved by at least 25% by August 30, 2020, then the targeted level of performance would be attained, which would result in a payout equal to 100% of the targeted amount. In the event that at least 30 communities received hands-on daily sales coaching and support, the Company improved conversion by 20% of APFM leads by December 31, 2020, speed to lead improved by at least 50% by December 31, 2020, and the Company’s new customer relationship management application was launched and utilized in at least 90% of communities by August 30, 2020, then the maximum level of performance would be attained, which would result in a payout equal to 150% of the targeted amount. As the maximum level of performance was achieved for this individual performance goal, the payout factor for this performance goal was 150%. |
(6) | With respect to this individual performance goal, the threshold level of performance was subject to developing risk management training tools and conducting training for all of the Company’s communities by October 31, 2020, which would result in a payout equal to 50% of the targeted amount. In the event that such training tools were developed and such trainings were conducted for all of the Company’s communities by September 30, 2020, then the targeted level of performance would be attained, which would result in a payout equal to 100% of the targeted amount. In the event that such training tools were developed and such trainings were conducted for all of the Company’s communities by July 31, 2020, then the maximum level of performance would be attained, which would result in a payout equal to 150% of the targeted amount. As the target level of performance was achieved for this individual performance goal, the payout factor for this performance goal was 100%. |
(7) | With respect to this individual performance goal, the threshold level of performance was subject to developing and finalizing standardized resident agreements and lease processes for customer relationship management testing and rollout by September 30, 2020, which would result in a payout equal to 50% of the targeted amount. In the event that such development and finalization were completed by July 31, 2020, then |
the targeted level of performance would be attained, which would result in a payout equal to 100% of the targeted amount. In the event that such development and training was completed by June 30, 2020, then the maximum level of performance would be attained, which would result in a payout equal to 150% of the targeted amount. As the target level of performance was achieved for this individual performance goal, the payout factor for this performance goal was 100%. |
MBO Incentive Plan Payouts for 2020
The table below shows the individual performance goals for our named executive officers under our MBO Incentive Plan for 2020 and the Compensation Committee’s determination as to whether such goals were achieved. Based upon each named executive officer’s achievement of his or her individual goals, the Compensation Committee had discretion to award between 0% and 150% of the target cash bonus to such named executive officer. As Mr. Hendrickson resigned as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective November 6, 2020 to pursue other career opportunities, he forfeited his MBO Incentive.
Executive | Target |
Plan Payout |
Plan Payout | |||||||||
Kimberly S. Lody | $ | 239,250 | 126.7 | % | $ | 299,063 | ||||||
Brandon M. Ribar | $ | 84,000 | 75.0 | % | $ | 63,000 | ||||||
David R. Brickman | $
| 51,176
|
|
| 110.6
| %
| $
| 57,591
|
|
(1) | Certain payout amounts differ slightly from the result of multiplying the targeted amounts by the plan payout factors in the table above due to rounding. |
Equity Compensation Arrangements
In addition to the employment agreements described above, our named executive officers are entitled to receive payments under the terms of our equity compensation plans and equity award agreements upon a “change in control” and the termination of the named executive officer’s employment due to death or disability.
2019 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan
In the event of a “change in control,” our 2019 Plan provides for the following treatment of awards unless otherwise provided in an award agreement:
Unless converted, assumed, or replaced by a successor or survivor corporation, or a parent or subsidiary thereof, all awards will become fully exercisable, all forfeiture restrictions will lapse, and, following the consummation of such change in control, all such awards will terminate and cease to be outstanding.
The number or value of any performance-based award or other award that is based on performance criteria or performance goals that will become fully earned, vested, exercisable and free of forfeiture restrictions will not exceed the greater of (i) such number or value determined by the actual performance attained during the applicable performance period to the time of the change in control or (ii) such number or value that would be fully earned, vested, exercisable and free of forfeiture restrictions had 100% of the target level of performance been attained for the entire applicable performance period without regard to the change in control.
If awards are assumed or continued after a change in control, the Compensation Committee may provide that all or a portion of such awards will become fully exercisable and all forfeiture restrictions will lapse immediately upon the involuntary termination of the participant’s employment or service within a designated period (not to exceed 24 months) following the effective date of such change in control.
Upon a change in control, the Compensation Committee may cause any and all awards outstanding to terminate at a specific time in the future, and will give each participant the right to exercise such awards during a period of time as the Compensation Committee, in its sole and absolute discretion, will determine.
The portion of any incentive stock option accelerated in connection with a change in control will remain exercisable as an incentive stock option only to the extent the applicable $100,000 limitation is not exceeded. To the extent such dollar limitation is exceeded, the accelerated portion of such option will be exercisable as a non-qualified stock option under the U.S. federal tax laws.
2007 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan
In the event of a “change in control,” our 2007 Omnibus Stock and Incentive Plan, as amended, provides for the following treatment of awards unless otherwise provided under the terms of an award or by the Compensation Committee prior to such transaction:
all outstanding awards (except performance awards which will be governed by their express terms) will become fully exercisable, nonforfeitable, or the restricted period will terminate, as the case may be; and
the Compensation Committee will have the right to cash out some or all outstanding non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights and shares of restricted stock on the basis of the highest price per share paid in any transaction reported on the NYSE or paid or offered in any bona fide transaction related to a “change in control” during the immediately preceding 60-day period, in each case as determined by the Compensation Committee (except that the cash out for stock appreciation rights related to incentive stock options will be based on transaction reported for the date on which the holder exercises the stock appreciation rights or, if applicable, the date on which the cash out occurs).
Time-Based Restricted Stock Award Agreements
When our named executive officers are awarded shares of restricted stock with time-based vesting provisions, each of them enters into a restricted stock award agreement with us. These restricted stock award agreements generally provide that, if the holder’s employment with us is terminated for any reason before the vesting date for the restricted shares, the restricted shares that have not previously vested will, automatically and without notice, terminate and be permanently forfeited as of such date, except that all unvested shares will vest if the holder’s employment terminates on or after the first anniversary of the grant date due to the holder’s death or disability.
In the event of a change in control, shares of time-based restricted stock will not automatically vest; provided, however, that (i) if the Compensation Committee has made a provision for the substitution, assumption, exchange or other continuation of such award in connection with the change in control, then in the event that the holder’s employment is terminated (A) by us due to death, disability or retirement following the change in control, then the unvested portion of the award will immediately fully vest, or (B) by us other than for “Cause” or by the holder for “Good Reason,” in each case within one year following the change in control, the unvested portion of the award will immediately fully vest; or (ii) if the Compensation Committee has not made a provision for the substitution, assumption, exchange or other continuation of such award in connection with the change in control, the unvested portion of the award will fully vest immediately prior to the change in control.
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award Agreements
When our named executive officers are awarded shares of performance-based restricted stock, each of them enters into a performance award agreement with us. These performance award agreements generally provide that, (1) if the holder’s employment with us is terminated for any reason before the vesting date for the performance shares, the performance shares that have not previously vested will, automatically and without notice, terminate and be permanently forfeited as of such date, and (2) the holder’s right to receive the specified percentage of performance shares that do not vest as a result of our failure to achieve the applicable performance measures will be automatically terminated and permanently forfeited; provided, that if a named executive officer’s continuous service is terminated by the Company due to the death or disability, the unvested performance shares will remain outstanding and a pro-rated portion thereof shall vest if the applicable performance target is satisfied during the performance period.
In the event of a change in control or an event which results in our common stock no longer being readily tradeable on an established securities market and provided the named executive officer remains in continuous service with the Company as of the date of such transaction, all or a portion of the performance shares may vest upon the closing of such transaction depending on the value of the consideration received by our shareholders in connection with the transaction.
2020 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our named executive officers’ outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards as of December 31, 2020. In connection with the closing of the Company’s previously announced rights offering and private placement transaction with the Conversant Funds in November 2021, all outstanding performance share awards were converted, at target award level, to time-based restricted stock awards that will vest on the applicable scheduled vesting dates or the relevant award termination date applicable to such performance shares.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(1) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kimberly S. Lody | 3,240 | 6,576 | (a) | — | 111.90 | 1/7/2029 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 3,288 | (b) | 40,574 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9,816 | (c) | 121,129 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brandon M. Ribar | — | — | — | — | — | 1,117 | (d) | 13,784 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,000 | (e) | 37,020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
David R. Brickman | — | — | — | — | — | 1,011 | (f) | 12,476 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | 599 | (g) | 7,392 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,263 | (h) | 27,925 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,645 | (i) | 32,639 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carey P. Hendrickson(2) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
(1) | Calculated by reference to the closing price for shares of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2020, which was $12.34 per share. |
(2) | Mr. Hendrickson resigned as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
(a) | Represents stock option to
|
CFFO Per Share | % of CFFO Per Share Target | Bonus as % of Base Salary | Amount | |||||||||||
$1.47 | 90.0 | % | 22.5 | % | $ | 167,109 | ||||||||
$1.63 | 100.0 | % | 25.0 | % | $ | 185,677 |
(b) |
|
(c) | Represents shares of restricted stock granted on January 7, 2019, which were scheduled to vest upon the |
(d) | Represents the remaining shares of |
(e) | Represents shares of |
(f) | Represents the
|
(g) | Represents the remaining shares |
(h) | Represents shares of restricted stock granted on May 14, 2019, which were scheduled to vest subject to the
|
(i) | Represents shares of restricted stock granted on March 27, 2018, which were scheduled to vest subject to the
|
The following table summarizes the compensation earned by our non-employee directors in 2020.
Name * | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1) | Stock Awards ($)(2) | Option Awards ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||||
Philip A. Brooks | $ | 125,000 | — | — | — | $ | 125,000 | |||||||||||||
Ed A. Grier(4) | $ | 80,000 | — | — | — | $ | 80,000 | |||||||||||||
E. Rodney Hornbake(4) | $ | 63,000 | — | — | — | $ | 63,000 | |||||||||||||
Paul J. Isaac(3) | $ | 31,250 | — | — | — | $ | 31,250 | |||||||||||||
Jill M. Krueger | $ | 82,500 | — | — | — | $ | 82,500 | |||||||||||||
Ross B. Levin(4) | $ | 120,000 | — | — | — | $ | 120,000 | |||||||||||||
Steven T. Plochocki(4) | $ | 67,500 | — | — | — | $ | 67,500 | |||||||||||||
Michael W. Reid(4) | $ | 155,000 | — | — | — | $ | 155,000 |
During 2020, we did not maintain any pension or deferred compensation arrangements for our directors.
* | None of Messrs. Beren, Harris, Johnson, Levy, Lieberman or Zibel was a director of the |
(1) | Represents an annual retainer fee and compensation for attendance at Board and committee meetings during 2020. See “—Compensation of Directors During 2020” below for more information. |