SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant | ||
Check the appropriate box: | ||
Preliminary Proxy Statement | ||
Confidential, for Use of the Commission | ||
Definitive Proxy Statement | ||
Definitive Additional Materials | ||
Soliciting Material Pursuant to |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee | |||||
No fee required. | |||||
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | ||||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | ||||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | ||||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | ||||
(5) | Total fee paid: | ||||
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||||
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing forwhich the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, orthe Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||||
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: | ||||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | ||||
(3) | Filing Party: | ||||
(4) | Date Filed: | ||||
MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC.150 Schilling Boulevard, Suite 100Collierville, Tennessee 38017Telephone (901) 753-3200RESULTS AT A GLANCE
SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||
(Dollars in thousands except per share data) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | |||||
Net Sales | 2,398,043 | 2,430,616 | 2,507,878 | 2,266,073 | 2,055,622 | |||||
Operating income | 245,838 | 191,403 | 172,969 | 150,807 | 154,401 | |||||
Net income | 139,493 | 100,972 | 104,459 | 85,598 | 99,727 | |||||
Diluted earnings per share | 2.47 | 1.79 | 1.82 | 1.49 | 1.74 | |||||
Dividends per share | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 8.40(2) | 0.38 | |||||
SUMMARY OF CASH FLOW | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | |||||
Cash Flow from Operations | 245,073 | 200,544 | 167,892 | 43,995 | 157,777 | |||||
Capital Expenditures | 43,885 | 31,162 | 38,481 | 46,131 | 37,497 | |||||
Free Cash Flow(1) | 201,188 | 169,382 | 129,411 | (2,136) | 120,280 | |||||
BALANCE SHEET | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||
(Dollars in thousands except per share data) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 119,075 | 97,944 | 72,616 | 120,269 | 351,317 | |||||
Total Assets | 1,528,568 | 1,370,940 | 1,369,549 | 1,320,173 | 1,447,476 | |||||
Total Debt | 327,876 | 386,254 | 496,698 | 465,072 | 227,364 | |||||
Ratio of current assets to current liabilities | 2.4 to 1 | 3.0 to 1 | 3.0 to 1 | 3.1 to 1 | 4.1 to 1 | |||||
Book value per share | 13.61 | 11.30 | 9.67 | 9.03 | 15.66 |
Notice of Annual Meeting ofStockholders to be HeldMay 2, 2019
To the Stockholders ofMueller Industries, Inc.
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Mueller Industries, Inc. (the “Company” or “Mueller”), will be held at the Company’s headquarters at 150 Schilling Boulevard, Second Floor, Collierville, Tennessee 38017 on Thursday, May 2, 2019, at 10:00 A.M. local time, for the following purposes:
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure, which represents cash flow from operations minus capital expenditures. Both cash flow from operations and capital expenditures presented above are as reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years presented. | ||
(2) | Includes special dividend of $8.00 per share paid on March 9, 2017. | |
(3) | EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of EBITDA to our results reported under GAAP. |
MESSAGE FROM OUR CHAIRMAN |
Dear Stockholders:
Just over a year ago, the COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented global health crisis and stopped the world in its tracks. Above all, we would like to extend our deepest gratitude to the first responders and medical personnel whose heroism and sacrifice have assisted so many communities impacted by this terrible virus. We are also grateful for and proud of our own employees who stepped up to the plate, adapting to new and rapidly evolving conditions to keep our businesses running, so that we could provide the many products that have proven so critical to our national and global infrastructure during this difficult period.
Despite the disruption caused by the pandemic, Mueller delivered solid results in 2020. After adjusting for the one-time gain of $22.1 million stemming from our claim in the Deepwater Horizon settlement, which was recorded during the first quarter, Mueller still achieved double digit growth over its prior year results in each of these key metrics: earnings, earnings per share (EPS), and cash generation.
These improvements over 2019 were driven by a combination of higher gross margins and SG&A cost containment. As value added products comprised a greater percentage of our overall revenues, and manufacturing costs decreased by 5.6% on a year over year basis, our gross margins improved by 1.7%. Moreover, when news of the pandemic first broke, we undertook aggressive cost-cutting measures, which proved instrumental in reducing costs in all areas of our business. As a result, on a comparative basis, our SG&A expenses declined by 6.4%.
Continued reinvestment in our manufacturing platform enabled our plants to be more agile and adapt to the downturn in demand.
Capital Deployment
Manufacturing is the backbone of our Company, and as such, strategic investment in our operations is not only critical to both workplace safety and product quality, but is also a key component of our core pursuit to be the low cost producer. In 2020, capital project spending totaled $43.9 million, and it was deployed with the care and sense of responsibility that have long characterized our approach to fiscal management. Excluding the $11 million purchase of our headquarters building in Collierville, Tennessee, our spending was slightly below our customary level of capital spending, and well below depreciation. Investment in environmental, health and safety initiatives totaled $8.4 million, and helped us reduce emissions, conserve more water and energy, and increase the amount of recycled material used in production. Of the remaining spend, $14.4 million was directed at two projects that will support our long term strategic plan and help deliver meaningful efficiencies in future years.
In 2020, we deployed $72.6 million to complete two strategic acquisitions. Integral to our growth strategy is the pursuit of acquisitions that are complementary to businesses we know and operate, including the two acquisitions we closed this past year.
2016-2020 CAPITAL ALLOCATION
Sustainability
Our strong financial and operating performance aside, the measure of any company’s success extends well beyond the numbers. Increasingly, we also evaluate our Company’s progress based on its contribution to the sustainability of the local communities in which we operate, and the world at large. Sustainability has many components, and we view the associated risks and opportunities through the widest lens. Looking inward, we take the necessary actions to ensure we provide a safe and healthy working environment for our people, as well as opportunities for professional growth and development. Looking outward, we consider how our decisions both impact and contribute to the communities in which we operate. We also consider how our decisions affect the various systems, both natural and technological, that sustain our living planet, and the impact the continued functioning of these systems may have on our ability to operate long term.
We are happy to report that in 2020, we again made positive strides in the environmental, social and governance (ESG) measures that are of increasing importance to our stockholders. Importantly, we greatly improved our safety performance, achieving a 16% reduction in accidents per man hour worked, with zero “major” OSHA recordable incidences. Since we began measuring them in 2010, we have reduced OSHA recordable incidences by 65% in our core businesses. Accounting for acquisitions during this same timeframe, our incidence rate has decreased by 35%.
As an industrial manufacturer, we devote a great amount of attention to environmental compliance. In 2020, our North American operations reduced greenhouse gas emissions by 9.5% on a per unit basis, and reduced energy consumption by 15.6% on a per unit basis. Moreover, we continue to utilize a majority of recycled scrap in our manufacturing process, 66% in 2019 and 57% in 2020.
RECYCLED CONTENT
We continue to seek alternative processing methodologies to increase our consumption percent of recycled materials. Using recycled copper significantly reduces the energy and water consumption that results from the mining process, and also mitigates the related environmental impacts that are otherwise incurred when raw material imports and unconsumed scrap exports must travel long distances.
Financial Conditions
At the close of 2020, the Company’s market capitalization was $1.98 billion. This equates to 6.8 times EBITDA and 8.0 times cash from operations. We held $119 million in cash, and had a total debt balance of $327 million. We recently announced our plan to redeem the $284 million in outstanding debentures due in 2027, along with a 30% increase in our dividend. At this time, I am pleased to report that the Company is in excellent financial shape and has ample liquidity and cash flows not only to operate our businesses, but also to pursue our continued growth plans both organically and through acquisitions.
Going Forward
The pandemic has impacted all global economies. With the arrival of vaccines, in record time, we anticipate that we will see reopenings and a return of demand in almost all businesses in the near future. In particular, residential building markets on a global basis remain underserved, and we expect expansion in home construction to help drive economic recoveries. Construction is an important determinant of demand for many of our products.
In addition, we are optimistic that in 2021 and beyond, we will continue to see increased demand for products and technologies aimed at clean water distribution, indoor air quality and climate comfort, refrigeration and food preservation, and energy storage and transmission. These all are important end markets, and will remain a focus as we consider growth opportunities.
Our approach is to set lofty goals and drive hard to exceed them. Our 2024 Plan calls for double digit compounded annual growth in operating income over a six-year period. As it did in 2019, our operating income growth in 2020 has kept us on track to achieve that Plan. Given the unprecedented challenges we confronted, our results are a testament to the strength of our Company, and the adaptability of those who work tirelessly on its behalf.
We remain optimistic about the future and once again thank our valued employees, loyal customers and, of course, our stockholders for their continued support.
Very truly yours,
Greg Christopher
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
THURSDAY, MAY 6, 2021
10:00 A.M., Central Time
150 Schilling Boulevard,
Second Floor
Collierville, Tennessee 38017
REVIEW YOUR PROXY STATEMENT AND VOTE IN ONE OF FOUR WAYS: | |||
BY INTERNET | |||
http://www.proxyvote.com | |||
BY TELEPHONE | |||
Call the telephone number on your proxy card. | |||
BY MAIL | |||
Mark, date, sign and return your | |||
proxy card in the enclosed envelope. | |||
IN PERSON | |||
Attend the Annual meeting at the | |||
Company’s headquarters. | |||
It is important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting regardless of the size of your holdings. Whether or not you intend to be present at the meeting in person, we urge you to mark, date and sign the enclosed proxy card and return it in the enclosed self-addressed envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States. | |||
NOTICE
of Annual Meeting
of Stockholders
PURPOSE To vote on three proposals: 1. To elect |
2. | To consider and act upon a proposal to approve the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accountants, as auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending December |
3. | To conduct an advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive |
To |
RECORD DATE
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 15, 2019,19, 2021, will be entitled to notice of and vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof. A complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be prepared and maintained at the Company’s corporate headquarters at 150 Schilling Boulevard, Suite 100, Collierville, Tennessee 38017. This list will be available for inspection by stockholders of record during normal business hours for a period of at least 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting.
IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOUR SHARES BE REPRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING REGARDLESS OF THE SIZE OF YOUR HOLDINGS. WHETHER OR NOT YOU INTEND TO BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING IN PERSON, WE URGE YOU TO MARK, DATE AND SIGN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURN IT IN THE ENCLOSED SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE, WHICH REQUIRES NO POSTAGE IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES.
/s/ Christopher J. Miritello |
March 28, 2019Christopher J. Miritello
Corporate Secretary
April 1, 2021
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 7
PROXY SUMMARY |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC.150 Schilling Boulevard, Suite 100Collierville, Tennessee 38017Telephone (901) 753-3200THIS SUMMARY HIGHLIGHTS SELECTED INFORMATION IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT. PLEASE REVIEW THE ENTIRE PROXY STATEMENT AND OUR ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K BEFORE VOTING YOUR SHARES.
— | 2020 PERFORMANCE |
PROXY STATEMENT
Annual MeetingAdjusted operating income and adjusted EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures which exclude certain items in order to better reflect results of StockholdersMay 2, 2019
SOLICITATION OF PROXIESon-going operations. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to our results reported under GAAP.
The accompanying proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Mueller Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), for use at the annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held at the Company’s headquarters at 150 Schilling Boulevard, Second Floor, Collierville, Tennessee 38017 on Thursday, May 2, 2019, at 10:00 A.M. local time, or at any adjournment(s) thereof.
This Proxy Statement, together with the Company’s Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2018, is first being mailed to stockholders on or about March 28, 2019. Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company is providing access to its proxy materials over the Internet at http://www.proxyvote.com.
When a proxy card is returned properly signed, the shares represented thereby will be voted in accordance with the stockholder’s directions appearing on the card. If the proxy card is signed and returned without directions, the shares will be voted for the nominees named herein and in accordance with the recommendations of the Company’s Board of Directors as set forth herein. The discretion granted in the accompanying proxy card includes the authority to vote on all additional matters properly coming before the Annual Meeting as the persons named in the proxy deem appropriate. A stockholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting by giving written notice to the secretary of the Annual Meeting or by casting a ballot at the Annual Meeting. Votes cast by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting will be tabulated by election inspectors appointed for the Annual Meeting. The election inspectors will also determine whether a quorum is present. The holders of a majority of the shares of commonMUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 8
— | ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS |
Date and Time: | Place: | Record Date: |
Thursday, May 6, 2021 | 150 Schilling Boulevard | March 19, 2021 |
10:00 A.M., Central Time | Second Floor | |
Collierville, Tennessee 38017 |
— | AGENDA AND VOTING MATTERS |
stock, $.01 par value per share (“Common Stock”), outstanding and entitled to vote whoWe are present either in person or represented by proxy will constitute a quorum for the Annual Meeting. The election inspectors will treat abstentions as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum and for purposes of determining the approval of any matter submitted. If a broker indicates on a proxy that it does not have discretionary authority as to certain sharesasking you to vote on a particular matter (i.e., a “broker non-vote”), those shares will not be considered as present and entitledthe following proposals at the Annual Meeting:
Proposal | Board Recommendation | Page Reference |
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors | FOR each nominee | 11 |
Proposal 2 – Approval of Auditor | FOR | 21 |
Proposal 3 – Say-on-Pay | FOR | 23 |
— | PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS |
The following table provides summary information about each director nominee. The Board of Directors believes that these nominees reflect an appropriate composition to vote with respect to that matter, but will be treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposeseffectively oversee the performance of determiningmanagement in the presence of a quorum. A broker is entitled to vote shares held for a beneficial owner on routine matters, such as the ratificationexecution of the appointmentCompany’s strategy, and as such, recommends a vote “for” each of the eight nominees listed below.
Name | Age | Director Since | Primary Occupation | Independence | Committee Memberships | Current Other Public Boards | ||||||
Gregory L. Christopher Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | 59 | 2010 | Chief Executive Officer, Mueller Industries, Inc. | N | None | None | ||||||
Elizabeth Donovan | 68 | 2019 | Retired, Chicago Board Options Exchange | Y | NCG | None | ||||||
Gennaro J. Fulvio | 64 | 2002 | Member, Fulvio & Associates, LLP | Y | A* | None | ||||||
Gary S. Gladstein | 76 | 2000 | Private Investor, Consultant | Y | C* | None | ||||||
Scott J. Goldman | 68 | 2008 | Chief Executive Officer, TextPower, Inc. | Y | A, C | None | ||||||
John B. Hansen | 74 | 2014 | Retired Executive Vice President, Mueller Industries, Inc. | Y | A, NCG | None | ||||||
Terry Hermanson Lead Independent Director since January 1, 2019 | 78 | 2003 | Principal, Mr. Christmas Incorporated | Y | None | None | ||||||
Charles P. Herzog, Jr. | 64 | 2017 | Co-Founder and Principal, Atadex LLC & Vypin LLC | Y | C, NCG* | None |
A = Audit Committee
C = Compensation and Stock Option Committee
NCG = Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
* = Chair
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 9
— | PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS |
We ask our stockholders to approve the selection of Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) as the Company’sour independent registered public accounting firm without instructions fromfor the beneficial owner of those shares; on the other hand, a broker may not be entitledfiscal year ending December 25, 2021. Below is summary information about fees paid to vote shares heldEY for a beneficial owner on certain non-routine items, such as the election of directors,services provided in 2020 and the2019:
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Audit Fees | $ | 2,749,755 | $ | 2,856,774 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees | 47,000 | 50,250 | ||||||
Tax Fees | 406,000 | 422,350 | ||||||
All Other Fees | — | — | ||||||
$ | 3,202,755 | $ | 3,329,374 |
— | PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
We are seeking your advisory vote onto approve the compensation of the Company’sour named executive officers.officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. Our executive officers are responsible for achieving long-term strategic goals, and as such, their compensation is weighted toward rewarding long-term value creation for stockholders. Beyond base salary and traditional benefits, we maintain an annual cash incentive compensation program that is driven by a pay-for-performance philosophy and based on ambitious performance targets both at the Company and business line levels. We also maintain a long-term equity incentive compensation program, the primary objective of which is to motivate and retain top talent — a particularly vital goal given the uniquely competitive industry in which we operate. Accordingly, we utilize a combination of extended time-vesting schedules and performance-based vesting criteria to encourage executives and associates alike to enjoy lengthy tenures at the Company, develop industry expertise and relationships, and drive our long-term success.
The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne byOur emphasis on creating long-term stockholder value is best illustrated in the Company. In addition to solicitation by mail, directors, officers and employeesfollowing charts, which show that long-term incentive compensation accounts for the largest percentage of the Company may solicit proxies by telephoneNEOs’ overall compensation for 2020. Moreover, a majority of the NEOs’ compensation — consisting of target long-term and short-term incentive compensation combined — is performance-based or otherwise. The Company will reimburse brokers or other persons holding stock in their names or in the names of their nominees for their charges and expenses in forwarding proxies and proxy material to the beneficial owners of such stock.“at risk.”
The Company had 56,624,732 shares of Common Stock outstanding at the close of business on March 15, 2019, which are the only securities of the Company entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting. The record holder of each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote on each matter that may properly be brought before the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 15, 2019 will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. The Company’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated By-laws (“Bylaws”) do not provide for cumulative voting for the election of directors.MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 10
On March 9, 2017, the Company paid a special dividend (the “Special Dividend”) consisting of $3.00 in cash and $5.00 in principal amount of the Company’s 6% Subordinated Debentures due 2027 (the “Debentures”) for each share of Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on February 28, 2017. In connection with the Special Dividend, in accordance with the Company’s outstanding stock option plans and agreements, the Company adjusted the shares subject to and the per share exercise price with respect to outstanding options. This adjustment resulted in an increase in the number of shares subject to each outstanding option and an adjustment to the option purchase price designed to maintain the option holders’ intrinsic value following issuance of the Special Dividend. References in this Proxy Statement to beneficial stock ownership or outstanding options for periods following March 9, 2017 reflect the equitable adjustment made to options outstanding on February 28, 2017.
PROXY STATEMENT |
— PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERSPROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
As of March 15, 2019, the following parties were known by the Company toEight director nominees will be the “beneficial owner” of more than five percent of the Common Stock:
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Shares Beneficially Owned | Percent of Class | ||
Blackrock, Inc. | 8,294,970(1) | 14.7%(2) | ||
55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 | ||||
GAMCO Investors, Inc. | 6,388,750(3) | 11.3%(2) | ||
One Corporate Center Rye, NY 10580 | ||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. | 5,817,628(4) | 10.3%(2) | ||
100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 | ||||
Wellington Management Group LLP | 4,131,406(5) | 7.3%(2) | ||
280 Congress Street Boston, MA 02210 | ||||
Wells Fargo & Company | 3,011,593(6) | 5.3%(2) | ||
420 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94163 |
The Board of Directors proposes to elect the following nine persons, each as nominated by the Board of Directors,elected at the Annual Meeting, each to serve (subject to the Company’s Bylaws) as directors of the Company until the next Annual Meetingannual meeting (tentatively scheduled for May 7, 2020)5, 2022), or until the election and qualification of their successors:successors. At the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board has nominated the following persons to serve as directors for the term beginning at the Annual Meeting: Gregory L. Christopher, Elizabeth Donovan, Paul J. Flaherty, Gennaro J. Fulvio, Gary S. Gladstein, Scott J. Goldman, John B. Hansen, Terry Hermanson and Charles P. Herzog, Jr. (collectively, the “Nominees”). If any such person should be unwilling or unable to serve as a director of the Company, which is not anticipated, the persons named in the proxy will vote the proxy for substitute nominees selected by them unless the number of directors has been reduced to the number of nominees willing and able to serve.
Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast. “Plurality”cast, which means that the individuals who receive the greatest number of votes cast “For” are elected as directors up to the maximum number of directors to be chosen at the Annual Meeting. Consequently, any shares not voted “For” a particular director (whether as a result of a direction to withhold or a broker non-vote) will not be counted in such director’s favor.
The Board of Directors has adopted a majority vote policy in uncontested elections. An uncontested election means any stockholders meeting called for purposes of electing any director(s) in which (i) the number of director nominees for election is equal to the number of positions on the Board of Directors to be filled through the election to be conducted at such meeting, and/or (ii) proxies are being solicited for the election of directors solely by the Company.
The election of directors solicited by this Proxy Statement is an uncontested election. In the event that a nominee for election in an uncontested election receives a greater number of votes “withheld”“Withheld” for his or her election than votes “For” such election, such nominee will tender an irrevocable resignation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which will decide whether to accept or reject the resignation and submit such recommendation for prompt consideration by the Board of Directors no later than ninety (90) days following the uncontested election.
— SELECTING NOMINEES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE THEIR SHARESFOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES.
OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK BY DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTOR NOMINEES
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers, among other things, the following table sets forth, ascriteria in selecting and reviewing director nominees:
• | personal and professional integrity, and the highest ethical standards; |
• | skills, business experience and industry knowledge useful to the oversight of the Company based on the perceived needs of the Company and the Board at any given time; |
• | the ability and willingness to devote the required amount of time to the Company’s affairs, including attendance at Board and committee meetings; |
• | the interest, capacity and willingness to serve the long-term interests of the Company; and |
• | the lack of any personal or professional relationships that would adversely affect a candidate’s ability to serve the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. |
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also assesses the close of business on March 15, 2019, information about the 1,875,248 shares of Common Stock (calculated based on 56,624,732 shares outstanding) beneficially owned by eachcontributions of the Company’s currentincumbent directors in connection with their potential re-nomination. In identifying and recommending director nominees, for director, executive officers and named executive officers. The “named executive officers” are those individuals set forththe Committee members take into account such factors as they determine appropriate, including recommendations made by the Board of Directors.
As reflected in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2018” included herein. Unless otherwise indicated, all directors, nominees for director, executive officers and named executive officers have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of Common Stock reported. The table and the accompanying footnotes set forth the foregoing persons’ current positions with the Company, principal occupations and employment over the preceding five years, age and directorships held in certain other publicly-owned companies, as well as, with respect to directors, the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that causedits formal charter, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the diversity of the Company’s Board and employees to be a tremendous asset. The Company is committed to maintaining a highly qualified and diverse Board, and as such, all candidates are considered regardless of their age, gender, race, color of skin, ethnic origin, political affiliation, religious preference, sexual orientation, country of origin, physical handicaps or any other category. These efforts to promote diversity are assessed annually to assure that the Board contains a balanced and effective mix of Directorsindividuals capable of advancing the Company’s long-term interests.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not consider individuals nominated by stockholders for election to determinethe Board. The Board believes that this is an appropriate policy because the person should serve asCompany’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and Restated By-laws (“Bylaws”) allow a directorqualifying stockholder to nominate an individual for election to the Board, said nomination of which can be brought directly before a meeting of stockholders. Procedures and deadlines for doing so are set forth in the Company’s Bylaws, the applicable provisions of which may be obtained, without charge, on the Company’s website or upon written request to the Secretary of the Company at the address set forth herein.
The presiding officer of the meeting may refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any person not made in 2018.compliance with the procedures set forth in the Bylaws. See “Stockholder Nominations for Board Membership and Other Proposals for 2021 Annual Meeting.”
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 11
— DIRECTOR NOMINEE BIOGRAPHIES
Age 59 Director Since 2010 | Mr. Christopher has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors since January 1, 2016. Mr. Christopher has served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company since | |||||
Principal Occupation, Employment, etc. | Common Stock Beneficially Owned as of March 15, 2019 | Percent of Class | |||
Charles P. Herzog, Jr. | 17,024 | * | |||
Director of the Company since July 31, 2017; age 61 (8) | |||||
Gregory L. Christopher | 669,869 | 1.2% | |||
Chairman of the Board of Directors since January 1, 2016; ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company since October 30, 2008; Directorof the Company since October 28, 2010; age 57 (9) | |||||
Brian K. Barksdale | 59,238 | * | |||
Vice President – Marketing of the Company sinceNovember 10, 2013; age 43 (10) | |||||
Daniel R. Corbin | 60,195 | * | |||
Senior Vice President – Plastics of the Company sinceMay 4, 2017; age 61 (11) | |||||
Kristee Ford | 5,000 | * | |||
Chief Information Officer of the Company sinceMay 1, 2019; age 43 (12) | |||||
Donald Glover | 19,134 | * | |||
President – Mueller Brass Company sinceJanuary 1, 2017; age 54 (13) | |||||
Jeffrey A. Martin | 143,899 | * | |||
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company sinceFebruary 14, 2013; age 52 (14) | |||||
Mark Millerchip | — | — | |||
Executive Director – European Operations of the Company sinceMay 28, 2010; age 52 (15) | |||||
Christopher J. Miritello | 20,901 | * | |||
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company sinceJanuary 1, 2017; age 36 (16) | |||||
Nicholas W. Moss | 192,713 | * | |||
President - B&K LLC since May 7, 2015; age 62 (17) | |||||
Steffen Sigloch | 151,523 | * | |||
Chief Manufacturing Officer of the Company sinceMay 4, 2017; age 50 (18) |
Director Since 2019 | Ms. Donovan was an early member, and at the time, one of the few women on the Chicago Board Options Exchange. She subsequently became an independent broker representing major institutional options orders and has been retired from employment for more than five years. | |
Ms. Donovan was nominated to serve as a director of the Company because of her knowledge of market dynamics andinstitutional trading practices, knowledge acquired through her 18-year tenure as a fiduciary representative amidst an array of market conditions. |
GENNARO J. FULVIO | |
Age 64 Director Since2002 | |
Mr. Fulvio, a Certified Public Accountant, has been a member of Fulvio & Associates, LLP, Mr. Fulvio was nominated to serve as a director of the Company because of his strength in the area of accounting, combinedwith his financial acumen, and his knowledge of and experience with tax |
GARY S. GLADSTEIN | |
Age 76 Director Since2000 | |
Mr. Gladstein served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company from 2013 to 2015, and was previously a director of the Company from 1990 to 1994. Mr. Gladstein is currently an independent investor and consultant. From the beginning of 2000 to August 31, 2004, Mr. Gladstein was a Senior Consultant at Soros Fund Management. He was a partner and Chief Operating Officer at Soros Fund Management from 1985 until his retirement at the end of 1999. Mr. Gladstein was nominated to serve as a director of the Company because of his financial and accounting expertise, |
SCOTT J. GOLDMAN | |
Age 68 Director Since2008 | |
For the past ten years, Mr. Goldman has served as Chief Executive Officer of TextPower, Inc. Mr. Goldman was nominated to serve as a director of the Company because of his extensive experience with |
cybersecurity,advanced technologies and global market strategies. |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 12
JOHN B. HANSEN | |
Age 74 Director Since2014 | |
Prior to his retirement as an Executive Vice President of the Company Mr. Hansen was nominated to serve as a director because of his extensive industry experience and deep knowledge of the |
TERRY HERMANSON | ||
Lead Independent Director | ||
Director Since2003 | Mr. Hermanson has been the principal of Mr. Christmas Incorporated, a wholesale merchandising company, since 1978, and serves as its Chairman. Mr. Hermanson was nominated to serve as a director of the Company because |
CHARLES P. HERZOG, JR. | |
Age 64 Director Since2017 | |
Since 2010, Mr. Herzog has been a principal at Atadex LLC, a firm he co-founded. He co-founded a second firm, Vypin LLC, in 2016. Atadex and Vypin provide advanced technological and data delivery solutions to support the transportation logistics industry. Mr. Herzog was nominated to serve as a director of the Company based on his extensive knowledge of the transportationlogistics industry, and the developing technologies that support it. | |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 13
Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors
During 2018, the Board of Directors held four regularly scheduled meetings and two special meetings. The Board of Directors established a standing Audit Committee and a Compensation and Stock Option Committee at its organizational meeting on February 13, 1991. On May 13, 1991, the Board of Directors created two committees (the “Plan Committees”) to be responsible for administering the Company’s 1991 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Company’s 1991 Incentive
Stock Option Plan. On November 16, 1993, the Board of Directors established a standing Nominating Committee. On May 12, 1994, the Board of Directors created two committees to be responsible for administering the Company’s 1994 Stock Option Plan and the Company’s 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, on February 12, 1998 created a committee to be responsible for administering the Company’s 1998 Stock Option Plan and on February 12, 2002 created a committee to be responsible for administering the Company’s 2002 Stock Option Plan (collectively, the “Option Plan Committees”). On February 12, 2004, the Board of Directors changed the name of the Nominating Committee to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
The Audit Committee is currently composed of three directors who are not officers or employees of the Company: Gary S. Gladstein (Chairman), Scott J. Goldman and John B. Hansen. Each member of the Audit Committee has been determined by the Board of Directors to meet the standards for independence required of audit committee members by the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and applicable SEC rules. For more information on the NYSE standards for independence, see “Corporate Governance-Director Independence” in this Proxy Statement. The Board of Directors has further determined that (i) all members of the Audit Committee are financially literate and (ii) Gary S. Gladstein possesses accounting and related financial management expertise within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE, and therefore is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of applicable SEC rules. The Audit Committee (a) appoints the Company’s independent accountants, (b) reviews and approves any major change in the Company’s accounting policies, (c) reviews the scope and results of the independent audit, (d) reviews and considers the independence of the accountants, (e) reviews the effectiveness of the Company’s internal audit procedures and personnel, (f) reviews the Company’s policies and procedures for compliance with disclosure requirements concerning conflicts of interest and the prevention of unethical, questionable or illegal payments and (g) makes such reports and recommendations to the Board of Directors as it may deem appropriate. The Audit Committee held six formal meetings during the last fiscal year, all of which were attended by the Company’s independent auditors. At its meetings, the Audit Committee discussed the scope and results of the annual audit and issues of accounting policy and internal controls.
The Compensation and Stock Option Committee is currently composed of three directors who are not officers or employees of the Company: Gennaro J. Fulvio (Chairman), Scott J. Goldman and Charles P. Herzog, Jr. Each member of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee has been determined by the Board of Directors to meet the NYSE’s standards for independence. The Compensation and Stock Option Committee (i) provides assistance to the Board of Directors in discharging the Board of Directors’ responsibilities relating to management organization, performance, compensation and succession and (ii) makes such recommendations to the Board of Directors as it deems appropriate. During fiscal year 2018, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee held four formal meetings.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is currently composed of four directors who are not officers or employees of the Company: Charles P. Herzog, Jr. (Chairman), Elizabeth Donovan, Paul J. Flaherty and Terry Hermanson. Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has been determined by the Board of Directors to meet the NYSE’s standards for independence. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for the recommendation to the Board of Directors of director nominees for election to the Board of Directors. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending committee assignments and responsibilities to the Board of Directors, overseeing the evaluation of Board of Directors and management effectiveness, developing and recommending to the Board of Directors corporate governance guidelines, and generally advising the Board of Directors on corporate governance and related matters. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held three formal meetings during fiscal year 2018.
The Board of Directors has currently implemented a leadership structure in which Mr. Christopher serves as both Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. The Board has determined that having Mr. Christopher serve in this dual capacity is in the best interest of stockholders at this time. The Company believes that this structure currently allows ultimate leadership and accountability to reside in a single individual, who has both extensive knowledge of the Company’s business and critical relationships with the Company’s customer base.
In order to coordinate the activities of the independent and non-management members of the Board of Directors, and to liaise between such directors and the Chairman of the Board, the Company has currently designated Mr. Hermanson to
serve as Lead Independent Director. The Lead Independent Director’s responsibilities are set forth in a formal charter, which can be obtained free of charge from the Company’s website at www.muellerindustries.com or may be requested in print by any stockholder.
The Board of Directors is actively involved in oversight of risks that could affect the Company. The full Board of Directors has retained the responsibility for general oversight of risks, but the Audit Committee primarily oversees those risks that may directly or indirectly impact the Company’s financial statements. The Board of Directors receives reports directly from officers responsible for oversight of particular risks within the Company, as well as full reports by the chair of the Audit Committee regarding the Audit Committee’s considerations and actions. The Board believes that through such open communication and access to information, it can sufficiently manage the risks facing the Company. The Board of Directors’ administration of its risk oversight function has not affected the Board’s leadership structure.
The Company operates within a comprehensive planadheres to an established set of corporate governanceCorporate Governance Guidelines for the purposepurposes of defining director independence, assigning responsibilities, setting high standards of professional and personal conduct, and assuringensuring compliance with such responsibilities and standards. The Company regularly monitors developmentsSuch Guidelines are periodically reviewed in the arealight of corporate governance. In July 2002, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) which, among other things, established, or provided the basis for, a number of newevolving trends in corporate governance standards, regulations and related disclosure requirements. In addition, following the passage of Sarbanes-Oxley,requirements, particularly as adopted by the NYSE adopted changesand (with respect to its corporate governance and listing requirements.the Audit Committee (the SEC)).
— Director IndependenceDIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The standards relied upon by theIn order for a director to qualify as “independent,” our Board of Directors inmust affirmatively determining whether adetermine, consistent with NYSE rules, that the director is “independent,” in compliancehas no material relationship with the rules ofCompany that would impair the NYSE, are comprised, in part, of those objective standards set forth in the NYSE rules.
Thedirector’s independence. Our Board of Directors undertook its annual review of director independence in February 2021. In applying the NYSE standards for independence, and after considering all of the relevant facts and circumstances, the Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that the Company’s current “independent” directors are: Elizabeth Donovan, Paul J. Flaherty, Gennaro J. Fulvio, Gary S. Gladstein, Scott J. Goldman, John Hansen, Terry Hermanson and Charles P. Herzog, Jr. In the course of the Board of Director’sDirectors’ determination regarding the independence of each non-management director, the Board considered for:
Mr. Hansen, the fact that while he was previously an executive officer of the Company (until his retirement on April 30, 2014), |
— Table of ContentsBOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES
Meetings of Non-Management Directors
The Board of Directors and its committees meet regularly throughout the year, and may also hold special meetings and act by written consent from time to time. In 2020, the Board of Directors held four regularly scheduled meetings and one special meeting. During this time, our directors attended 100% of our Board of Directors meetings and meetings of the committees on which they served. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Company’s non-management directors shall hold annually at least two formal meetings independent from management. Our Lead Independent Director presides at these executive sessions of the Board of Directors.
Three standing committees have been convened to assist the Board of Directors with various functions: the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each committee operates pursuant to a formal charter that may be obtained, free of charge, at the Company’s website at www.muellerindustries.com, or by requesting a print copy from our Corporate Secretary at the address listed herein.
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 14
AUDIT COMMITTEE | |
Current Members: Gennaro J. Fulvio (Chairman) Meetings in | The Audit Committee assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight functions with respect to matters involving financial reporting, independent and internal audit processes, disclosure controls and procedures, internal controls over financial reporting, related-party transactions, employee complaints, cybersecurity and risk management. In particular, the Audit Committee is responsible for: • appointing, retaining, compensating and evaluating the Company’s independent auditors; • reviewing and discussing with management and the independent auditors the Company’s annual and quarterly financial statements, and accounting policies; • reviewing the effectiveness of the Company’s internal audit procedures and personnel; • reviewing, evaluating and assessing the Company’s risk management programs, including with respect to cybersecurity; • reviewing the Company’s policies and procedures for compliance with disclosure requirements concerning conflicts of interest and the prevention of unethical, questionable or illegal payments; and • making such other reports and recommendations to the Board of Directors as it deems appropriate. The Board of Directors has determined that each Audit Committee member meets the standards for independence required by the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) and applicable SEC rules. Moreover, it has determined (i) that all members of the Audit Committee are financially literate; and (ii) that Gennaro J. Fulvio possesses accounting and related financial management expertise within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE, and therefore is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of applicable SEC rules. In accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, the above paragraph regarding the independence of the members of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C of the Exchange Act or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, notwithstanding any general incorporation by reference of this Proxy Statement into any other filed document. |
COMPENSATION AND STOCK OPTION COMMITTEE | ||
Current Members: Gary S. Gladstein(Chairman) Meetings in | ||
The • providing assistance to | ||
• making such recommendations to the Board of Directors as it deems appropriate. The Board of Directors has determined that |
NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE | |
Current Members: Charles P. Herzog, Jr.(Chairman) Meetings in | The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for: • recommending director nominees to the Board of • recommending committee assignments and responsibilities to the Board of Directors; • overseeing the evaluation of the Board of Directors and management effectiveness; • developing and recommending to the Board of Directors corporate governance guidelines; • reviewing and discussing with management the Company’s • generally advising the Board of Directors on corporate governance and related matters. The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the NYSE’s standards for independence. |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 15
— Table of Contents
Compensation and Stock Option CommitteeBOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE
The CompensationBoard of Directors has currently implemented a leadership structure in which Mr. Christopher serves as both Chief Executive Officer and Stock Option Committee operates underChairman of the Board. The Board has determined that having Mr. Christopher serve in this dual capacity is in the best interest of stockholders at this time. The Company believes that this structure currently allows ultimate leadership and accountability to reside in a formal charter adopted bysingle individual, who has both extensive knowledge of the Company’s business and critical relationships with the Company’s customer base.
In order to coordinate the activities of the independent members of the Board of Directors, that governs its duties and standards of performance. Copiesto liaise between such directors and the Chairman of the Board, the Company has currently designated Mr. Hermanson to serve as Lead Independent Director. The Lead Independent Director’s responsibilities are set forth in a formal charter, which can be obtained free of charge from the Company’s website at www.muellerindustries.com, or may be requested in print by any stockholder.
Independent Compensation Advisor
From November 2017— BOARD’S ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT
The Board of Directors is actively involved in oversight of risks that could affect the Company. These efforts can be summarized as follows:
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 16
The Board of Directors has adopted various policies, including a comprehensive set of Corporate Governance Guidelines, by which the Company is governed. These policies are designed to March 2018,promote sound corporate governance and prudent stewardship of the Company, both by the Board of Directors and management.
Anti-Pledging Policy
The Corporate Governance Guidelines include amendments adopted in February 2020 that prohibit the future pledging of the Company’s common stock as security under any obligation by our directors and executive officers.
Insider Trading and Anti-Hedging Policy
The Company maintains a policy which mandates compliance with insider trading laws and institutes safeguards to mitigate the risk of insider trading. Further, the Corporate Governance Guidelines prohibit any director, officer or employee of the Company from engaging in short sales, transactions in derivative securities (including put and call options), or other forms of hedging and monetization transactions, such as zero-cost collars, equity swaps, exchange funds and forward sale contracts, that allow the holder to limit or eliminate the risk of a decrease in the value of the Company’s securities.
Clawback Policy
Under the Corporate Governance Guidelines, if the Company is required to restate its financial results due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements under the securities laws as a result of an executive’s (i.e., a President or Vice President level officer’s) willful, knowing or intentional misconduct or gross negligence (as determined by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee retained Willis Towers Watson (“Willis Towers”) to review and advise regarding various provisions of the employment agreement betweenCommittee), the Company and its Chief Executive Officer. The engagement of the independent advisory services of Willis Towers was made at the direction of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee in partial responsemay take action to the results of the 2017 stockholder advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. The Compensation and Stock Option Committee did not utilize Willis Towers’ services to benchmark executive compensation (or any component thereof) against any particular peer group.
During 2018, Willis Towers’ aggregate fees in connection with advice relating to executive compensation were $16,392. In addition to providing services related to executive compensation in 2018, Willis Towers also provided non-executive compensation consulting services to the Company. The non-executive compensation consulting services provided by Willis Towers in 2018 included retirement advice, corporate risk and broking advice and health care consulting services. During 2018, Willis Towers’ fees for these additional services were $312,973. Requests for non-executive compensation consulting services are made to Willis Towers by persons belowrecoup from the executive officer level within the departmentsall or any portion of our Company that have a need for such services, and those requests are made without the involvement of our senior management or other personnel who may be associated with Willis Towers’ engagement with executive compensation consulting.
The Compensation and Stock Option Committee assessed the independence of Willis Towers and, based on this assessment, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee determined that, given the nature and scope of these additional services, these additional services did not raise a conflict of interest and did not impair Willis Towers’ ability to provide independent advice to the Compensation and Stock Option Committee concerning executive compensation matters.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers and assesses the implementation and effectiveness of its diversity policy in connection with Board nominations annually to assure that the Board contains an effective mix of individuals to best advance the Company’s long-term business interests.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not consider individuals nominated by stockholders for election to the Board. The Board believes that this is an appropriate policy because the Company’s Bylaws allow a qualifying stockholder to nominate an individual for election to the Board, which proposal can be brought directly before a meeting of stockholders, as described below. In order for a qualifying stockholder to nominate an individual to the Board, written notice of such stockholder’s intent to make such nomination must beincentive award received by the Secretaryexecutive, the amount of which had been determined in whole or in part upon specific performance targets relating to the restated financial results. In such an event, the Company at the Company’s principal place of business (150 Schilling Boulevard, Suite 100, Collierville, Tennessee 38017) not less than 120 days and not more than (i) with respectshall be entitled to an election to be held at an annual meeting of stockholders, 150 days priorrecoup up to the anniversary date ofamount, if any, by which the immediately preceding annual meeting (unless the annual meeting date is advanced by more than thirty days or delayed by more than thirty days, in which case different deadlines apply) and (ii) with respect to an election to be held at a special meeting of stockholders for the election of directors, not earlier than 90 days prior to the special meeting and not later than the later of (a) 60 days prior to such special meeting or (b) the tenth day following the day on which public announcement is first made of the date of the special meeting, provided that in the event that the number of directors to be elected to the Board is increased and there is no public announcement naming all of the nominees for director or specifying the size of the increased Board madeincentive award actually received by the Company at least 70 days prior toexecutive exceeded the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, a stockholder’s notice shall also be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions created by such increase, if it is delivered to the Secretary of the Company not later than the tenth day following the day on which such public announcement is first made by the Company. To be a qualifying stockholder, the stockholder must be a stockholder of record at the time the notice was delivered to the Secretary of the Company. Each such notice shall set forth: (a) as to each person whom the stockholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a director, all information relating to such personpayment that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A (or successor provisions) under the Exchange Act, including such
person’s written consent to be named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected; (b) as to any other business that the stockholder desires to be brought before the meeting, a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting, the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting and any material interest in such business of such stockholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made; and (c) as to the stockholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made (i) the name and address of such stockholder, as they appearwould have been received based on the Company’s books, and of such beneficial owner and (ii) the class and number of shares of Common Stock which are owned beneficially and of recordrestated financial results, as determined by such stockholder and such beneficial owner. The presiding officer of the meeting may refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any person not made in compliance with the foregoing procedure. See “Stockholder Nominations for Board Membership and Other Proposals for 2019 Annual Meeting.”
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During fiscal year 2018, Gennaro J. Fulvio, Paul J. Flaherty and Scott J. Goldman served on the Compensation and Stock Option Committee. No memberThe Company’s right of recoupment pursuant to this policy applies to incentive awards received during the Compensation and Stock Option Committee was, during fiscal year 2018, an officer or employee ofthree-year period preceding the date on which the Company or was formerly an officer ofis required to prepare the Company. In addition, no member ofrestatement, based on the Compensation and Stock Option Committee, during fiscal year 2018, had any relationship requiring disclosure by the Company as a related party transaction under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. No executive officer of the Company served on any board of directors or compensation committee of any other company for which anydetermination of the Company’s directors served as an executive officer at any time during fiscal year 2018.independent registered public accounting firm.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is designed to help officers, directors and employees resolve ethical issues in an increasingly complex business environment. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is applicable to all of the Company’s officers, directors and employees, including the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and other persons performing similar functions. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics covers topics, including but not limited to, conflicts of interest, confidentiality of information and compliance with laws and regulations.
Director Responsibilities
It is the duty of the Board of Directors to serve as prudent fiduciaries for stockholders and to oversee the management of the Company’s business. Accordingly, the Corporate Governance Guidelines include specifications for director qualification and responsibility, attendance, access to officers and employees, compensation, orientation, continuing education and self-evaluation.
The Company’s policy is that all members of the Board of Directors attend annual meetings of stockholders, except where the failure to attend is due to unavoidable circumstances or conflicts discussed in advance with the Chairman of the Board. Because of travel restrictions and safety concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Chairman excused all non-management members of the Board of Directors from attending the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders in person.
Where to Find Our Key Governance Policies: The | ||
MUELLER INDUSTRIESPolicies and Procedures for Approval of Related Party Transactions •
Related party transactions may present potential or actual conflicts of interest and create the appearance that Company decisions are based on considerations other than the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Management carefully reviews all proposed related party transactions (if any), other than routine banking transactions, to determine if the transaction is on terms comparable to terms that could be obtained in an arms-length transaction with an unrelated third party. Management reports to the Audit Committee and then to the Board of Directors on all proposed material related party transactions. Upon the presentation of a proposed related party transaction to the Audit Committee or the Board, the related party is excused from participation in discussion and voting on the matter.2021 PROXY STATEMENT 17
Directors’ Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders
It is the policy of the Company’s Board of Directors to expect that all directors attend annual meetings of stockholders except where the failure to attend is due to unavoidable circumstances or conflicts discussed in advance with the Chairman of the Board. With the exception of Mr. Goldman, who was excused by the Chairman, all members of the Board of Directors attended the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
Communication with the Board of Directors
— | COMMUNICATION WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
Any stockholder or interested party who wishes to communicate with the Board of Directors, or specific individual directors, including the non-management directors as a group, may do so by directing a written request addressed to such directors or director in care of the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, Mueller Industries, Inc., 150 Schilling Boulevard, Suite 100, Collierville, Tennessee 38017. Communication(s) directed to members of the Board who are not non-management directorsChairman will be relayed to the intended Board member(s)him, except to the extent that it is deemed unnecessary or inappropriate to do so pursuant to the procedures established by a majority of the independent directors. Communications directed to non-management directors will be relayed to the intended Board member(s)director except to the extent that doing so would be contrary to the instructions of the non-management directors. Any communication so withheld will nevertheless be made available to any non-management director who wishes to review it.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides an overview of how our named executive officers were compensated in 2018, as well as how this compensation furthers our established compensation philosophy and objectives.
We believe in a pay for performance philosophy, such that a material portion of a named executive officer’s compensation is dependent upon both the short-term and long-term strategic and financial performance of the Company, considered in light of general economic and specific Company, industry, and competitive conditions. For 2018, we continued to reward named executive officers in a manner
consistent with this philosophy by setting annual incentive targets based on the Company’s achievement of a certain level of operating income. For the long-term component of compensation, we continued to grant equity awards, such that any long-term compensation opportunity will be directly tied to our stock performance. Moreover, as we have done since 2016, we included a performance criterion for vesting of a portion of the long term equity awards granted in 2018 to our named executive officers (other than Mr. Millerchip). This feature is aimed at ensuring that any vesting of such grants is conditioned upon the Company’s achievement of specified growth targets in either total stockholder return or diluted earnings per share.
Further, as explained in more detail below, our Compensation and Stock Option Committee engaged Willis Towers Watson during 2017 and the first quarter of 2018 to provide advice in designing and negotiating a new employment agreement for our Chief Executive Officer that would eliminate the “single-trigger” severance feature that certain of our stockholders identified as a cause of concern. These negotiations were ultimately successful and resulted in our entry into a new employment agreement with our Chief Executive Officer on March 15, 2018 that, among other things, eliminated the single-trigger severance entitlement that existed under this prior agreement upon the occurrence of a change in control of the Company. Mr. Christopher’s employment agreement is described in more detail below.
Compensation Policies and Objectives
In light of our pay for performance philosophy, we have designed our compensation programs for our executive officers to (i) reward our executive officers for the achievement of certain strategic and financial goals, (ii) align the long-term financial interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders, (iii) encourage our executive officers to continue their service with the Company, and (iv) provide a means to attract additional talented executive officers when necessary.
At our 2018 Annual Meeting, we held our annual non-binding stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation. Approximately 96% of our shares voted (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes) were in favor of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting.
Our Compensation and Stock Option Committee will consider the outcome of this year’s stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation as it makes future compensation decisions.
In accordance with the advisory vote on the frequency of the stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation submitted to stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders held in May 2017, the Company will continue to hold a stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation every year until the next required advisory vote on the frequency of such votes which, in accordance with applicable law, will occur no later than the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders in 2023.
For 2018, compensation for our Chief Executive Officer was determined by our Compensation and Stock Option Committee. For 2018, compensation decisions for our other named executive officers were made by our Compensation and Stock Option Committee after consideration of the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer. Our Compensation and Stock Option Committee meets at least three times per year to determine all elements of our named executive officers’ compensation, including base salary, annual incentive compensation, and long-term equity awards. Each element of compensation plays an important role in our compensation program, and we make compensation decisions regarding each element in the context of its effect on total compensation.
In determining the levels of compensation, we generally do not rely on formulaic guidelines but rather maintain a flexible compensation program that allows us to adapt components and levels of compensation to motivate and reward individual executives within the context of our desire to attain certain strategic and financial goals and control cost. This requires that we consider subjective factors including (i) an executive officer’s performance against corporate objectives in recent years, (ii) the value of the executive officer’s skills and capabilities in supporting the long-term performance of the Company, (iii) performance of each executive officer’s specific management responsibilities, (iv) each executive officer’s contribution as a member of the executive management team, and (v) whether each executive officer’s total compensation potential and structure is sufficient to ensure the
retention of the executive officer when considering the compensation potential that may be available elsewhere. As such, we make reasoned subjective determinations about compensation levels.
In making compensation decisions, our Compensation and Stock Option Committee relies on the members’ general knowledge of our industry, supplemented by advice from our Chief Executive Officer based on his knowledge of our industry in markets in which we participate. From time to time, we conduct informal analyses of compensation practices and our Compensation and Stock Option Committee may review broad-based third-party surveys to obtain a general understanding of current compensation practices.
In 2018, Mr. Christopher’s compensation was determined based on his management of the day-to-day activities of the Company and its subsidiaries. His incentive compensation was determined by the Company meeting specific adjusted operating income targets, as discussed below under the heading “Annual Incentive Compensation.”
In 2018, Mr. Martin’s compensation was determined based on his day-to-day management of corporate accounting, finance, credit, tax, investor relations and capital allocation initiatives. His incentive compensation was determined by the Company meeting specific adjusted operating income targets, as discussed below under the heading “Annual Incentive Compensation.”
In 2018, Mr. Millerchip’s compensation was determined based on his management of the Company’s European operations. His incentive compensation was determined by the Company meeting certain adjusted operating income targets, as discussed below under the heading “Annual Incentive Compensation.”
In 2018, Mr. Moss’s compensation was determined based on his management of our Trading products business. His incentive compensation was determined by the Company meeting specific adjusted operating income targets, as discussed below under the heading “Annual Incentive Compensation.”
In 2018, Mr. Sigloch’s compensation was determined based on his strategic leadership of the Company’s manufacturing activities, particularly its core brass rod and copper tube manufacturing. His incentive compensation was determined by the Company meeting specific adjusted operating income targets, as discussed below under the heading “Annual Incentive Compensation.”
Our compensation program for our named executive officers is composed of six elements: (i) base salary, (ii) traditional benefits, (iii) annual incentive compensation, (iv) long-term equity incentive compensation, (v) perquisites, and (vi) post-employment and change-in-control compensation. Each element of compensation plays an important part in our overall compensation policies and objectives.
Base Salary and Traditional Benefits
We provide base salary and traditional benefits such as group health, disability, and life insurance benefits, as well as matching contributions to our 401(k) plan, as a means of providing a base level of compensation for services performed, to encourage the continued service of our executive officers and to attract additional talented executive officers when necessary. Salaries paid to our named executive officers are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018. Base salary adjustments are determined by making reasoned subjective determinations about current economic conditions such as general wage inflation as well as the executive’s qualifications, experience, responsibilities, and past performance. For 2018, Mr. Christopher’s base salary was increased by 13.6% effective November 12, 2018; Mr. Martin’s base salary was increased by 2.0% effective April 30, 2018, and by 9.7% effective May 14, 2018; Mr. Moss’s base salary was increased by 2.5% effective April 30, 2018; Mr. Sigloch’s base salary was increased by 2.0% effective April 30, 2018; and Mr. Millerchip’s base salary was increased by 2.5% effective April 1, 2018.
Annual Incentive Compensation
Each of our named executive officers received annual incentive compensation in 2018, based upon the Company’s actual performance for 2018 relative to the performance targets (as described below) established by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee on February 9, 2018.
For 2018, the amount of incentive compensation payable to each of our named executive officers was determined by multiplying (i) the named executive officer’s actual base salary paid during 2018, (ii) the named executive officer’s incentive grade level factor (125% for Mr. Christopher; 90% for each of Messrs. Martin, Moss and Sigloch; and 75% for Mr. Millerchip), and (iii) the named executive
officer’s performance factor. The performance factor applicable to each of the named executive officers was determined based on the achievement level of the consolidated Company adjusted operating income target, as shown in the following table:
2018 | 2018 | ||||||||||||
Performance | Performance | Achievement | Performance | ||||||||||
Name | Criteria(1) | Target | Weighting | Performance | Level | Factor | |||||||
Gregory L. Christopher | Consolidated Company Adjusted Operating Income | $165.0 million | 100% | $181.6 million | 110% | 130%(2) | |||||||
Jeffrey A. Martin | Consolidated Company Adjusted Operating Income | $165.0 million | 100% | $181.6 million | 110% | 130%(2) | |||||||
Nicholas W. Moss | Consolidated Company Adjusted Operating Income | $165.0 million | 50% | $181.6 million | 110% | 130%(2) | |||||||
Trading Group Adjusted Operating Income | $23.0 million | 25% | $14.6 million | 63% | 0(3) | ||||||||
Brass Value Added Adjusted Operating Income | $9.8 million | 25% | $10.0 million | 102% | 100%(2) | ||||||||
Steffen Sigloch | Consolidated Company Adjusted Operating Income | $165.0 million | 100% | $181.6 million | 110% | 130%(2) | |||||||
Mark Millerchip | Mueller Europe Adjusted Operating Income | £11.8 million | 100% | £13.0 million | 110% | 130%(2) |
Performance to Target | Payout Percentage | Performance to Target | Payout Percentage | ||||
< 80% | 0% | 117% | 160% | ||||
80-84% | 40% | 118% | 165% | ||||
85-89% | 55% | 119% | 170% | ||||
90-94% | 70% | 120% | 175% | ||||
95-99% | 85% | 121% | 180% | ||||
100-104% | 100% | 122% | 185% | ||||
105-109% | 115% | 123% | 190% | ||||
110-114% | 130% | 124% | 195% | ||||
115% | 150% | 125% | 200% | ||||
116% | 155% | > 125% | 200% |
As a resultRelated party transactions may present potential or actual conflicts of 2018 performance,interest, and create the annual incentive payments for the named executive officers, whichappearance that Company decisions are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018, equal the following percentages of each named executive officer’s actual base salary paid during 2018: 162.5% for Mr. Christopher (125% grade level factor times a 130% performance factor); 117% for Mr. Martin (90% grade level factor times a 130% performance factor); 81% for Mr. Moss (90% grade level factor times performance factors of 130%, 0% and 100% weighted on a 50%-25%-25% basis respectively); 117% for Mr. Sigloch (90% grade level factor times a 130% performance factor)); and 97.5% for Mr. Millerchip (75% grade level factor times a 130% performance factor). In 2018, in addition to receiving annual incentive compensation, Mr. Moss received a discretionary bonus of $26,136. The discretionary bonus was paid in recognition of his outstanding service to the Company and leadership.
Long-Term Equity-Based Incentive Program
Our long-term equity-based incentive compensation rewards our named executive officers for achievement of our long-term financial success as measured by our stock price. As such, it aligns the financial interests of our named executive officers with our stockholders and rewards our named executive officers for
increased stockholder value. Historically, we have granted restricted stock to our named executive officers, as discussed below. Generally, our equity incentive awards have been granted subject to three- or five-year vesting schedules, which we believe rewards outstanding service by our named executive officers and provides us with an effective mechanism to incentivize our named executive officers to achieve long-term financial success for the Company, to provide a strong retention incentive, and to align the interests of our named executive officers with the long-term interest of our stockholders.
Moreover, since 2016, we have added a performance criterion for vesting of a portion of the long term equity awards granted to Messrs. Christopher, Martin, Moss and Sigloch. The introduction of this feature was aimed at ensuring that any vesting of such grants is conditioned upon the Company’s achievement of specified growth targets in either total stockholder return or diluted earnings per share over the reference period, which for the 2018 grants, was December 30, 2017 to the last day of the 2022 fiscal year. For this purpose, total stockholder return will be determined by dividing (i) an amount equal to the 30-day trailing average closing price of a share of stock as of the applicable reference date, minus $35.91 (the 30-day trailing average closing price of a share of stock as of December 30, 2017), plus the value of any dividends and distributions paid during the reference period, by (ii) $35.91, and multiplying such amount by 100.
Long-term equity incentive awards to our named executive officers, other than our Chief Executive Officer (and in the case of Mr. Millerchip due to his residency in the United Kingdom, stock appreciation rights, which are treated as phantom shares for purposes of this Proxy Statement), are typically granted annually by our Compensation and Stock Option Committee based on the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer. Long-term equity incentive awards to our Chief Executive Officer are granted annually based on the determinations of our Compensation and Stock Option Committee. In recent years, it has been the Company’s practice to issue long-term equity incentive awards to certain executives andconsiderations other employees in late July following release of the Company’s second quarter and six-month operating results. In 2018, consistent with our historical practices, the named executive officers received annual grants in July 2018. In addition to Mr. Christopher’s annual grant, the Compensation Committee determined to grant him a special performance-based restricted stock award in July 2018, in recognition of his outstanding service, leadership and commitment to the well-being of the Company. The Compensation
and Stock Option Committee has concluded that restricted stock awards (i) encourage key personnel to focus on sustainable long-term performance, (ii) strengthen the relationship between compensation and growth in the market price of the Company’s common stock and thereby align management’s financial interests with those of the stockholders and (iii) help attract and retain talented management personnel. In determining which named executive officers should receive restricted stock awards during 2018, and the size of these awards, our Compensation and Stock Option Committee made reasoned subjective determinations based upon the performance of the named executive officers, the importance of retaining their services, and their role in helping us work toward our long-term goals. There was no set formula for the granting of annual restricted stock awards to individual named executive officers or phantom shares to Mr. Millerchip. In 2018, we granted shares of restricted stock to Messrs. Christopher, Martin, Moss and Sigloch covering an aggregate of 185,000 shares. In lieu of restricted stock, Mr. Millerchip received 13,000 phantom shares, which represent the right to receive a lump sum cash payment, as soon as administratively practicable following July 31, 2023, in an amount equal to (i) the product of (x) 13,000 and (y) the average of the highest and lowest trading prices for one share of the Company’s common stock on July 31, 2023 (or, if July 31, 2023 is not a trading day, the trading day immediately preceding July 31, 2023) as reported on the principal national securities exchange on which the common stock is listed and traded on such date, plus (ii) the cash equivalent of any dividends paid in respect of 13,000 shares of common stock during the period commencing on August 1, 2018 and ending on July 31, 2023).
To foster retention, the 2018 equity-based awards generally vest over a five year period, subject to accelerated vesting on certain involuntary terminations and upon a change in control (as explained in more detail in the Grant of Plan Based Awards table below). The Compensation and Stock Option Committee elected to use a long-term vesting schedule, and included a performance based criterion for vesting with respect to certain of the awards granted to the named executive officers in 2018 to promote retention and to incentivize performance. Further, because total shareholder return and diluted earnings per share are metrics generally associated with stockholder value and long-term growth, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee determined to use those metrics as the underlying criteria for vesting of the performance-based long-term incentive awards. In addition, given the importance of long-term equity incentive awards in our compensation program, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee determined to provide for accelerated vesting to compensate our executive officers for their contributions to the Company
and to provide them with assurance that they will not be disadvantaged with respect to their equity awards in the event of a change in control or in connection with certain involuntary terminations of employment.
Perquisites
We offer certain perquisites to our named executive officers, which we view as an added element of our executive compensation program designed to attract, retain and reward our named executive officers. The perquisites we provided in fiscal year 2018 were as follows: estate and tax planning, certain club memberships, Company incentive trips, personal use of our Company airplane, and reimbursement of the income tax liabilities associated with certain perquisites. Estate and tax planning is provided to certain named executive officers to complement our various compensation elements for the purpose of ensuring the named executive officers understand the complexity of the long-term equity incentives and are thereby able to maximize the value of such benefits. We provide certain club memberships in part to facilitate networking with and entertainment of our business clients. Because of the nature of such memberships, our named executive officers gain some personal benefits. We offer Company incentive trips to reward top achievers in our organization. We maintain a Company-owned airplane primarily to provide efficient transportation to certain employees and customers for business travel. From time to time, when our plane is not being used for business purposes, we allow certain named executive officers to use the plane for personal travel.
2018 Compensation Decisions
As noted above, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee retained Willis Towers in November 2017, and worked with Willis Towers until March 2018, to review and advise regarding various provisions of the employment agreement between the Company and Mr. Christopher. The engagement of the independent advisory services of Willis Towers was made at the direction of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee in partial response to the results of the 2017 stockholder advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. The Compensation and Stock Option Committee did not utilize Willis Towers’ services to benchmark executive compensation (or any component thereof) against any particular peer group.
On March 15, 2018, in response to the feedback we have received from our stockholders, we entered into an indefinite term employment agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) with Mr. Christopher, pursuant to which he will continue to serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, reporting directly to the Board. The Employment Agreement eliminates the “single-trigger” severance to which Mr. Christopher would have been entitled upon the occurrence of a change in control of the Company under the prior employment agreement. In consideration for the payments and benefits provided under the Employment Agreement, Mr. Christopher agreed to be subject to certain restrictive covenants during the term of his employment and thereafter, including customary non-compete restrictions that apply for one year post-termination and customary non-solicitation restrictions with respect to current and prospective employees that apply for one year post-termination. In addition, during the term of his employment and for one year thereafter, Mr. Christopher is prohibited from contacting any customer or prospective customer of the Company, or any representative of the same, for the purpose of providing any service or product competitive with any service or product sold or provided by the Company.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to certain executive officers, subject historically to an exception for qualifying “performance-based compensation.” The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted on December 22, 2017, substantially modified Section 162(m) of the Code and, among other things, eliminated the performance-based exception to the $1,000,000 million deduction limit effective as of January 1, 2018. As a result, as of 2018, compensation paid to certain executive officers in excess of $1,000,000 million is nondeductible, whether or not it is performance-based. In addition, beginning in 2018, the executive officers subject to Section 162(m) of the Code (the “Covered Employees”) will include any individual who served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer at any time during the taxable year and the three other most highly compensated officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) for the taxable year, and once an individual becomes a Covered Employee for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016, that individual will remain a Covered Employee for all future years, including following any termination of employment.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act includes a transition rule under which the changes to Section 162(m) of the Code described above will not apply to compensation
payable pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017 and is not materially modified after that date. To the extent applicable to our existing contracts and awards, we may avail ourselves of this transition rule. However, because of uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of the transition rule, no assurances can be given at this time that our existing contracts and awards, even if in place on November 2, 2017, will meet the requirements of the transition rule. Moreover, to maintain flexibility in compensating executive officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals in the best interest of the company, we do not limit our actions with respect to executive compensation to preserve deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code if we determine that doing so is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. Management carefully reviews all proposed related party transactions (if any), other than routine banking transactions, to determine if the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in an arms-length transaction with an unrelated third party. Management reports to the Audit Committee, and then to the Board of Directors on all proposed material related party transactions. Upon the presentation of a proposed related party transaction to the Audit Committee or the Board of Directors, the related party is excused from participation in discussion and voting on the matter.
— | ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) RISK MANAGEMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY |
The Company assesses and manages environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) considerations that may be material to the long-term sustainability of our business. In February 2021, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter was formally amended to include the management of ESG risk within the Committee’s jurisdiction. In that spirit, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall be responsible for reviewing and discussing with management the Company’s implementation of procedures for identifying, assessing, monitoring, managing and reporting on the ESG and sustainability risks and opportunities related to the Company’s business. Among other matters, we focus on such issues as workplace health and safety, environmental stewardship, business ethics and compliance, supply chain management and the development of human capital. We also focus outwardly on the communities in which we operate, including through a foundation that makes charitable contributions to various causes and organizations. ESG-related risks and opportunities are integral to our strategic decision-making. Such matters are addressed by senior management and subject to the oversight of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the full Board of Directors. The Company is also prioritizing the enhanced reporting and disclosure of the ESG-related risks and opportunities relating to its business and associated metrics, and has published its first sustainability report, which is available on the Company’s website.
MUELLER INDUSTRIESCompensation Risk Management •
In establishing compensation programs for the Company’s executive officers and non-executive employees, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee and senior management of the Company, respectively, consider the potential effect(s) of such programs on the Company, as well as whether such programs create appropriate incentives. The only component of employee compensation that might pose a risk of having an adverse effect is annual cash incentive compensation, which is intended to incentivize our employees to achieve short-term financial performance objectives, and ties a portion of an employee’s compensation to the achievement of such objectives. While annual cash incentive compensation encourages risk taking on the part of the Company’s employees in their efforts to achieve these objectives, the Company believes that the risk is well managed and the level of risk is acceptable. Moreover, certain senior management members have a substantial portion of their compensation in the form of equity-based awards that are long-term in nature, including equity awards that are subject to achievement of long-term financial performance objectives. We believe this counter balances any motivation to unduly favor excessive short-term risk taking. We also believe that the applicable performance objectives create appropriate incentives for our employees from year-to-year. Risk is further reduced by the fact that annual cash incentives are awarded on a discretionary basis; any known excessive risk taking could result in a reduction or elimination of the annual payment. Furthermore, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are subject to clawback provisions under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
For these reasons we believe that our compensation policies and practices are not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.2021 PROXY STATEMENT 18
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR 2018
The following table shows compensation of our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, and other named executive officers for the 2018, 2017 and 2016 fiscal years, as applicable.
Non-Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Incentive Plan | All Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salary | Bonus | Awards | Compensation | Compensation | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position | Year | ($) | ($) | ($)(1) | ($) | ($) | ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gregory L. Christopher | 2018 | 1,117,308 | — | 3,873,600 | (2) | 1,815,625 | 543,480 | (3) | 7,350,013 | |||||||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer & Chairman | 2017 | 1,100,000 | — | 2,105,280 | 962,500 | 445,812 | 4,613,592 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 1,100,000 | — | 2,388,400 | 1,168,750 | 157,275 | 4,814,425 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey A. Martin | 2018 | 359,873 | — | 581,040 | 421,052 | 68,553 | (4) | 1,430,518 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer | 2017 | 335,000 | — | 526,320 | 211,050 | 58,519 | 1,130,889 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 310,962 | — | 614,160 | 237,886 | 15,155 | 1,178,163 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas W. Moss | 2018 | 387,205 | 26,136 | (5) | 710,160 | 313,637 | 173,294 | (6) | 1,610,432 | |||||||||||||||||||
President – B&K LLC | 2017 | 378,967 | — | 774,000 | 185,031 | 154,518 | 1,492,516 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 368,719 | 50,000 | 921,240 | 282,070 | 25,260 | 1,647,289 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Steffen Sigloch | 2018 | 328,693 | — | 807,000 | 384,571 | 227,048 | (7) | 1,747,312 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Manufacturing Officer | 2017 | 321,906 | — | 774,000 | 179,623 | 114,222 | 1,389,751 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 310,961 | — | 921,240 | 237,886 | 40,376 | 1,510,463 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mark Millerchip | 2018 | 200,175 | 419,640 | 195,171 | 133,932 | (10) | 948,918 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Director, Mueller Europe (8) (9) | 2017 | 207,595 | 383,982 | 233,545 | 100,547 | 925,669 |
2020 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION |
Our non-employee director compensation for 2020 was awarded in a combination of cash and equity, as shown below.*
Annual | For serving as Lead Independent Director, Mr. Hermanson received an annual fee of $90,000. |
Annual fee for other directors | All other non-employee directors received an annual fee of $62,000. |
Discretionary Bonus | All non-employee directors received a discretionary bonus of $10,000. |
Meeting fees | • $3,000 per full Board meeting attended • $3,000 per Audit Committee meeting attended • $1,000 per Compensation and Stock Option Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or special meeting attended |
Annual fees for Committee Chairs | • $25,000 for the |
• $6,000 each for the chairs of the Compensation and Stock Option and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees | |
In 2018, the total compensation of Mr. Christopher, our Chief Executive Officer, was $7,350,013, as reported in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2018.” Based on the methodology described below, we determined that the median employee in terms of total 2018 compensation of all of our employees (other than Mr. Christopher) received an estimated $35,587 in total compensation for 2018. Therefore, the estimated ratio of 2018 total compensation of Mr. Christopher to the median employee was 207:1.
In general, we offer employees base salary, company retirement plan contributions, the opportunity to receive incentive awards for performance, and other benefits. In accordance with SEC rules, the median employee compensation provided above reflects company retirement plan contributions, incentive awards for 2018 performance and other benefits, but does not reflect benefits relating to group life or health plans generally available to all salaried employees.
To determine median employee compensation, we took the following steps:
2018 GRANTS OF PLAN BASED AWARDS TABLE
The following table sets forth summary information regarding all grants of plan-based awards made to our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2018.
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | Units (#)(3) | Awards ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gregory L. Christopher | — | 558,654 | 1,396,635 | 3,491,588 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | 50,000 | — | 70,000 | (3) | 3,873,600 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey A. Martin | — | 129,554 | 323,886 | 647,771 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | 6,000 | — | 12,000 | (3) | 581,040 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicholas W. Moss | — | 139,394 | 348,485 | 696,969 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | 4,000 | — | 18,000 | (3) | 710,160 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Steffen Sigloch | — | 118,329 | 295,824 | 591,647 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | 10,000 | — | 15,000 | (3) | 807,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mark Millerchip | — | 60,526 | 151,314 | 226,971 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13,000 | (4) | 419,640 |
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grant of Plan Based Awards Table
Employment Agreement with Mr. Christopher
On March 15, 2018, we entered into an indefinite term employment agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) with Mr. Christopher, pursuant to which he will continue to serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, reporting directly to the Board. The Employment Agreement replaced Mr. Christopher’s prior employment agreement and, in so doing, eliminated the “single-trigger” severance to which Mr. Christopher would have been entitled upon the occurrence of a change in control of the Company under the prior employment agreement.
The Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Christopher will receive a base salary of not less than $1,100,000 per year and will be eligible to receive an annual bonus award determined by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee. For each fiscal year, Mr. Christopher’s target annual bonus will be 125% of his base salary upon achievement of target performance levels and he will be eligible for a maximum annual bonus of 250% of base salary when performance equals or exceeds 125% of the applicable performance objectives, with the actual annual bonus payable being based upon the actual level of achievement of annual Company and individual performance objectives for such fiscal year, as determined by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee. In addition, during the term of
Mr. Christopher’s employment, the Company will maintain a term life insurance policy for Mr. Christopher with a face value of at least $5 million, and Mr. Christopher will have the right to name the beneficiary of such term life insurance policy.
In the event that Mr. Christopher’s employment is terminated for any reason (other than by the Company for “cause” (as defined in the Employment Agreement)), he will, subject to his execution of a general release in favor of the Company and his continued compliance with certain restrictive covenants (the “Conditions”), be entitled to receive the following payments and benefits: (i) any accrued but unpaid compensation and benefits; (ii) any unpaid annual bonus with respect to the previously completed fiscal year; (iii) subject to achievement of the applicable performance objectives for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, payment of a prorated annual bonus for such fiscal year; and (iv) continued medical, dental and hospitalization coverage (or payment in lieu of coverage if coverage is not permitted by applicable law or the terms of the applicable plan) for Mr. Christopher, his spouse and covered dependents until the latest of Mr. Christopher’s 70th birthday, his spouse’s 70th birthday, and the 3rd anniversary of such termination.
Additionally, if Mr. Christopher’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Christopher for “good reason” (as defined in the Employment Agreement), Mr. Christopher will, subject to the Conditions, be entitled to (i) continued payment of his base salary for 36 months; except that if such termination occurs during the 24-months immediately following a “change in control” (as defined in the Employment Agreement), such amount will be paid in a lump sum on the first regularly scheduled payroll date following the 60th day following such termination; and (ii) an amount equal to 3 times Mr. Christopher’s target annual bonus in respect of the fiscal year in which such termination occurs (or prior fiscal year, if greater), such amount to be paid in equal installments over the 3-year period following such termination at the same time such amounts would otherwise have been paid to Mr. Christopher had no termination occurred; provided that if Mr. Christopher’s termination of employment occurs during the 24-month period following the consummation of a “change in control,” such amount will be paid in a lump sum on the first regularly scheduled payroll date following the 60th day following such termination. The Employment Agreement does not provide for any “single-trigger” severance payments or benefits.
The Employment Agreement does not provide any gross-up or tax assistance on the severance benefits. Instead, the Employment Agreement contains a “modified cutback” provision, which would act to reduce the benefits payable to Mr. Christopher to the extent necessary so that no “golden parachute excise tax” would be imposed on the benefits paid, but only if doing so would result in Mr. Christopher retaining a larger after-tax amount.
Mr. Christopher is subject to certain restrictive covenants during the term of his employment and thereafter, including customary non-compete restrictions that apply for one year post-termination and customary non-solicitation restrictions with respect to current and prospective employees that apply for one year post-termination. In addition, during the term of his employment and for one year thereafter, Mr. Christopher is prohibited from contacting any customer or prospective customer of the Company, or any representative of the same, for the purpose of providing any service or product competitive with any service or product sold or provided by the Company.
Change in Control Agreements with Messrs. Martin, Moss, Sigloch and Millerchip
On July 26, 2016, the Company entered into change in control agreements with certain key members of the management team, including Messrs. Martin, Moss, Sigloch and Millerchip. Pursuant to those agreements, if, upon or within two years following a “change in control”, the executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” (other than on account of death or Disability), or by the executive for “good reason”, subject to execution of a general release of claims, the executive shall be entitled to: (i) an amount equal to two times the executive’s base salary (as in effect immediately prior to the change in control or, if greater, the date of such termination); and (ii) an amount equal to two times the average annual bonus paid to the executive (including, for this purpose only, any amounts deferred) in respect of the three calendar years immediately preceding the calendar year in which the change in control occurs (or the three calendar years immediately preceding the calendar year of such termination, if greater). The terms “change in control” and “cause” are defined in the 2014 Incentive Plan and the term “good reason” is defined in each executive’s change in control agreement. The agreements also provide that for two years following termination under the circumstances described above, each of Messrs. Martin, Moss and Sigloch will receive (subject to the executive’s election of COBRA continuation coverage under the Company’s group health plan) continued coverage under the Company’s group health plan at
the Company’s cost (or at the direction of the Company, reimbursement for COBRA premiums) for two years following such termination. In the case of Mr. Millerchip, he will receive the cost of private health care, based upon costs incurred by the Company in the applicable year of termination, for two years following such termination.
2009 Stock Incentive Plan
In 2018, we maintained the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved by our stockholders at our Annual Meeting in May 2009. Our Compensation and Stock Option Committee administers the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan and is authorized to, among other things, designate participants, grant awards, determine the number of shares of Common Stock to be covered by awards and determine the terms and conditions of any awards, and construe and interpret the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan and related award agreements. The 2009 Stock Incentive Plan reserved 1,500,000 shares of our Common Stock for issuance, subject to adjustment in the event of any change in the outstanding Common Stock or the capital structure of the Company or any other similar corporate transaction or event. The 2009 Stock Incentive Plan terminated as of February 12, 2019, and as such, there are no remaining shares issued thereunder that may be issued in the future.
2014 Incentive Plan
In 2018, we maintained the 2014 Incentive Plan, which was approved by our stockholders at our Annual Meeting in May 2014. Our Compensation and Stock Option Committee administers the 2014 Incentive Plan and is authorized to, among other things, designate participants, grant awards, including cash-based awards that historically were intended to qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, determine the number of shares of Common Stock to be covered by awards and determine the terms and conditions of any awards, and construe and interpret the 2014 Incentive Plan and related award agreements. The 2014 Incentive Plan reserved 1,500,000 shares of our Common Stock for issuance, subject to adjustment in the event of any change in the outstanding Common Stock or the capital structure of the Company or any other similar corporate transaction or event.
We will continue to maintain the 2014 Incentive Plan and grant awards pursuant to it. The Mueller Industries, Inc. 2019 Incentive Plan, if approved by our stockholders, will be maintained in addition to the 2014 Incentive Plan.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL 2018 YEAR-END
The following table sets forth summary information regarding the outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 29, 2018.
Option Awards(1) | Stock Awards | ||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) | ||||||||||
Gregory L. Christopher(3) | 07/25/2014 | — | — | — | — | 12,800 | 299,648 | — | — | ||||||||||
07/24/2015 | — | — | — | — | 44,800 | 1,048,768 | — | — | |||||||||||
07/28/2016 | — | — | — | — | 60,000 | 1,404,600 | 10,000 | 234,100 | |||||||||||
07/27/2017 | — | — | — | — | 60,000 | 1,404,600 | 8,000 | 187,280 | |||||||||||
07/26/2018 | 70,000 | 1,638,700 | 50,000 | 1,170,500 | |||||||||||||||
Jeffrey A. Martin | 07/30/2009 | 9,066 | — | 9.75 | 07/30/2019 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
07/23/2010 | 8,800 | — | 10.01 | 07/23/2020 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
07/25/2013 | (4) | — | — | — | — | 6,000 | 140,460 | — | — | ||||||||||
11/22/2013 | (5) | �� | — | — | — | 3,020 | 70,698 | — | — | ||||||||||
07/25/2014 | (6) | — | — | — | — | 8,600 | 201,326 | — | — | ||||||||||
07/24/2015 | (8) | — | — | — | — | 13,300 | 311,353 | — | — | ||||||||||
07/28/2016 | (9) | — | — | — | — | 10,000 | 234,100 | 8,000 | 187,280 | ||||||||||
07/27/2017 | (10) | — | — | — | — | 10,000 | 234,100 | 7,000 | 163,870 | ||||||||||
07/26/2018 | (11) | 12,000 | 280,920 | 6,000 | 140,460 | ||||||||||||||
Nicholas W. Moss | 07/23/2010 | 24,445 | — | 10.01 | 07/23/2020 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
07/25/2013 | (4) | — | — | — | — | 6,000 | 140,460 | — | — | ||||||||||
11/22/2013 | (5) | — | — | — | — | 5,034 | 117,846 | — | — | ||||||||||
07/25/2014 | (7) | — | — | — | — | 5,000 | 117,050 | — | — | ||||||||||
07/24/2015 | (8) | — | — | — | — | 17,500 | 409,675 | — | — | ||||||||||
07/28/2016 | (9) | — | — | — | — | 23,000 | 538,430 | 4,000 | 93,640 | ||||||||||
07/27/2017 | (10) | — | — | — | — | 21,000 | 491,610 | 4,000 | 93,640 | ||||||||||
07/26/2018 | (11) | 18,000 | 421,380 | 4,000 | 93,640 | ||||||||||||||
Steffen Sigloch | 07/25/2013 | (4) | — | — | — | — | 6,000 | 140,460 | — | — | |||||||||
11/22/2013 | (5) | — | — | — | — | 4,196 | 98,228 | — | — | ||||||||||
07/25/2014 | (6) | — | — | — | — | 12,200 | 285,602 | — | — | ||||||||||
07/24/2015 | (8) | — | — | — | — | 20,200 | 472,882 | — | — | ||||||||||
07/28/2016 | (9) | — | — | — | — | 15,000 | 351,150 | 12,000 | 280,920 | ||||||||||
07/27/2017 | (10) | — | — | — | — | 15,000 | 351,150 | 10,000 | 234,100 | ||||||||||
07/26/2018 | (11) | 15,000 | 351,150 | 10,000 | 234,100 | ||||||||||||||
Mark Millerchip | 11/22/2013 | (12) | — | — | — | — | 2,350 | 55,014 | — | — | |||||||||
07/31/2016 | (13) | — | — | — | — | 12,000 | 280,920 | — | — | ||||||||||
07/27/2017 | (12) | — | — | — | — | 12,000 | 280,920 | — | — | ||||||||||
07/26/2018 | (12) | — | — | — | — | 13,000 | 419,640 | — | — |
Table of Contentsstock.
The following table sets forth the value realized by each of our named executive officers as a result of the vesting of restricted stock during the fiscal year ended December 29, 2018.
Stock Awards | ||||||||
Number of | Value | |||||||
Shares Acquired | Realized | |||||||
on Vesting | on Vesting | |||||||
Name | (#) | ($)(1) | ||||||
Gregory L. Christopher | 44,800 | 1,436,288 | ||||||
Jeffrey A. Martin | 5,500 | 176,330 | ||||||
Nicholas W. Moss | 16,100 | 516,166 | ||||||
Steffen Sigloch | 11,200 | 359,072 | ||||||
Mark Millerchip | 10,000 | (2) | 320,600 |
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT ORCHANGE OF CONTROL AS OF THE END OF 2018
Pursuant to the employment agreement with our Chief Executive Officer, and the equity award and change in control agreements with our other named executive officers, upon a change in control or certain terminations of employment, our named executive officers are entitled to payments of compensation and benefits and/or accelerated vesting of equity awards, in each case as described below. The table below reflects the amount of compensation and benefits payable to each named executive officer in the event of (i) a change in control, (ii) an involuntary termination without cause or a resignation for good reason (specifically, for Messrs. Martin, Moss, Sigloch and Millerchip, the occurrence of such a termination upon or within two years following a change in control), and (iii) a termination by reason of death or disability. The named executive officers are not entitled to any payments in connection with a termination for cause.
The amounts shown assume the applicable triggering event occurred on December 29, 2018, and are estimates of the amounts that would be paid to the named executive officers upon the occurrence of such triggering event..
Accelerated | ||||||||||||||||||
Vesting of | ||||||||||||||||||
Salary & | Equity Awards | |||||||||||||||||
Name | Triggering Event | Bonus ($) | Benefits ($) | ($) | Total ($) | |||||||||||||
Gregory L. Christopher | Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason | 10,253,125 | (1) | 332,701 | (3) | 7,088,433 | (4) | 17,674,259 | ||||||||||
Termination Due to Death or Disability | 1,815,625 | (2) | 332,701 | (3) | 8,680,313 | (4) | 10,828,639 | |||||||||||
Change in Control | — | — | 8,680,313 | (4) | 8,680,313 | |||||||||||||
Termination Without Good Reason | — | 332,701 | (3) | — | 332,701 | |||||||||||||
Jeffrey A. Martin | Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason following a Change in Control | 1,329,992 | (5) | 36,544 | (5) | 2,457,880 | (4) | 3,824,416 | ||||||||||
Termination Due to Death or Disability | — | — | 2,457,880 | (4) | 2,457,880 | |||||||||||||
Change in Control | — | — | 2,457,880 | (4) | 2,457,880 | |||||||||||||
Nicholas W. Moss | Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason following a Change in Control | 1,352,253 | (5) | 50,313 | (5) | 3,126,741 | (4) | 4,529,307 | ||||||||||
Termination Due to Death or Disability | — | — | 3,126,741 | (4) | 3,126,741 | |||||||||||||
Change in Control | — | — | 3,126,741 | (4) | 3,126,741 | |||||||||||||
Steffen Sigloch | Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason following a Change in Control | 1,196,598 | (5) | 36,544 | (5) | 3,499,948 | (4) | 4,733,090 | ||||||||||
Termination Due to Death or Disability | — | — | 3,499,948 | (4) | 3,499,948 | |||||||||||||
Change in Control | — | — | 3,499,948 | (4) | 3,499,948 | |||||||||||||
Mark Millerchip(6) | Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason following a Change in Control | 792,175 | (5) | 60,198 | 1,062,185 | (4) | 1,914,558 | |||||||||||
Termination Due to Death or Disability | — | — | 1,062,185 | (4) | 1,062,185 | |||||||||||||
Change in Control | — | — | 1,062,185 | (4) | 1,062,185 |
The table below summarizes the total compensation we paid to our non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2018.
Fees Earned or | All Other | |||||||||||||||||||
Paid in Cash | Stock Awards | Option Awards | Compensation | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Name | ($) | ($)(1) | ($)(1) | ($)(2) | ($) | |||||||||||||||
Paul J. Flaherty | 73,000 | 55,290 | 27,628 | 800 | 156,718 | |||||||||||||||
Gennaro J. Fulvio | 83,000 | 55,290 | 27,628 | 800 | 166,718 | |||||||||||||||
Gary S. Gladstein | 128,000 | 55,290 | 27,628 | 800 | 211,718 | |||||||||||||||
Scott J. Goldman | 81,000 | 55,290 | 27,628 | 800 | 164,718 | |||||||||||||||
John B. Hansen | 83,000 | 55,290 | 27,628 | 800 | 166,718 | |||||||||||||||
Terry Hermanson | 91,000 | 55,290 | 27,628 | 800 | 174,718 | |||||||||||||||
Charles P. Herzog, Jr. | 77,000 | 55,290 | 27,628 | 200 | 160,118 |
During the 2018 fiscal year, each of the non-employee directors received an annual fee of $60,000 in addition to fees of $2,000 per Board meeting. *In his capacity as Chairman of the Board of Directors, Mr. Christopher received neither a retainer nor any meeting fees.
During the 2018 fiscal year, each director received $2,000 per Audit Committee meeting attended by such director. Also, each director received $1,000 per Compensation and Stock Option, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meeting attended by such director. In addition, each director received reimbursement for such director’s expenses incurred in connection with any such Board or Committee meeting, and each Committee fee was paid whether or not such committee meeting was held in conjunction with a Board of Directors meeting.
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 19
— | 2020 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION |
The Chairman oftable below summarizes the Audit Committee received an annual fee of $15,000 whiletotal compensation we paid to our non-employee directors for the Chairman of each of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees received an annual fee of $5,000.fiscal year ended December 26, 2020.
Name | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | Stock Awards ($) | (1) | Option Awards ($) | (1) | All Other Compensation ($) | (2) | Total ($) | |
Elizabeth Donovan | 77,000 | 48,660 | 27,230 | 10,800 | 163,690 | ||||
Paul J. Flaherty | 38,000 | — | — | 32,600 | 70,600 | ||||
Gennaro J. Fulvio | 118,000 | 48,660 | 27,230 | 10,800 | 204,690 | ||||
Gary S. Gladstein | 84,000 | 48,660 | 27,230 | 10,800 | 170,690 | ||||
Scott J. Goldman | 96,000 | 48,660 | 27,230 | 10,800 | 182,690 | ||||
John B. Hansen | 95,000 | 48,660 | 27,230 | 10,800 | 181,690 | ||||
Terry Hermanson | 103,000 | 48,660 | 27,230 | 10,800 | 189,690 | ||||
Charles P. Herzog, Jr. | 86,000 | 48,660 | 27,230 | 10,800 | 172,690 |
(1) | Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted to our directors in 2020, determined under Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 718. For information on the valuation assumptions with respect to awards made, refer to Note 17 - Stock-Based Compensation to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements filed with its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2020. The amounts above reflect the Company’s aggregate expense for these awards and do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the directors. As of December 26, 2020, the aggregate number of shares of our Common Stock subject to outstanding options held by our non-employee directors was as follows: Ms. Donovan, 10,000 shares, Mr. Fulvio, 35,555 shares, Mr. Gladstein, 45,333 shares, Mr. Goldman, 40,444 shares, Mr. Hansen, 25,778 shares, Mr. Hermanson, 16,000 shares, and Mr. Herzog, 14,000 shares. All non-employee directors each held 2,000 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
(2) | Other cash compensation included (i) a $10,000 cash award provided to our non-employee directors (with the exception of Mr. Flaherty, who retired from the Board effective May 7, 2020) in recognition of the support they provided amidst the unprecedented challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic (which included participation in special conference calls for which they otherwise received no compensation), and (ii) $800 in cash dividends. Included in Mr. Flaherty’s other compensation is $31,800 in fees pursuant to a consulting agreement in which Mr. Flaherty provides services to the Company in the areas of customer and industry relations. The term of the agreement is July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021, subject to extension upon the mutual agreement of the parties. |
— STOCK OWNERSHIP POLICY FOR DIRECTORS
In 2018, each non-employee director received a grantTo further align the Company’s goal of options to purchase 4,000 sharesaligning directors’ economic interests with those of our Common Stock and was granted 2,000 shares of restricted stock pursuant to our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan. Ms. Donovan was elected tostockholders, the Board effective January 1, 2019, and as such, received no director compensation in respect of the 2018 fiscal year. Upon joining the Board on January 1, 2019, Ms. Donovan received a grant of options to purchase 2,000 shares of our Common Stock pursuant to our 2009 Stock Incentive Plan. The options were fully vested as of their date of grant.
The Company has adopted stock ownership guidelines for its non-employee directors recommending that they hold equity interests of the Company (including vested and unvested interests, provided that with respect to options, only vested options that are exercisable within 60 days of the applicable measurement date will be counted) with a value equal to three times the annual cash director fee payable to each such director. The purpose of the stock ownership guidelines is to ensure that directors achieve and maintain a minimum level of stock ownership in order to further the Company’s goal of aligning director economic interests with those of stockholders. All directors are expected to comply with the stock ownership guidelines within five years of being elected to the Board of Directors, and current directors should comply as soon as practicable. Director compliance with the stock ownership guidelines is monitored on an ongoing basis by the Company’s General Counsel.
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 20
APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENTREPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEEOF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee has reappointed Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) to audit and certify the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 25, 2021, subject to ratification by the Company’s stockholders, which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Boardoutstanding shares of Directorsthe Company present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. If the appointment of EY is not so ratified, the Audit Committee will reconsider its action and will appoint auditors for the 2021 fiscal year without further stockholder action. Notwithstanding, the Audit Committee may at any time in the future in its discretion reconsider the appointment without submitting the matter to a vote of stockholders. Representatives of EY are expected to attend the Annual Meeting to answer questions and make a statement if they so choose.
Fees for EY’s audit and other services for each of the two fiscal years ended December 26, 2020 and December 28, 2019 are set forth below:
2020 | 2019 | |||||||
Audit Fees (professional services rendered for the audit of (i) the Company’s consolidated annual and interim/quarterly financial statements, and (ii) internal controls over financial reporting) | $ | 2,749,755 | $ | 2,856,774 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees (assurance and other services, including international accounting and reporting compliance) | 47,000 | 50,250 | ||||||
Tax Fees (tax compliance, advice and planning) | 406,000 | 422,350 | ||||||
All Other Fees | — | — | ||||||
$ | 3,202,755 | $ | 3,329,374 |
The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year, and any such pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services. The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its Chairman when expedition of services is necessary. The independent auditors and management are required periodically to report to the full Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent auditors in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. All of the services provided by the independent auditors during fiscal years 2020 and 2019, respectively, under the categories Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees described above were pre-approved.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE THEIR SHARES FOR THE APPROVAL OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM. |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 21
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K with management, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.
The Audit Committee reviewed with the independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company’s accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s (PCAOB) Auditing Standard No. 1301. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors the auditors’ independence from management and the Company, including the matters in the written disclosures required by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s Rule 3526, and considered the compatibility of non-audit services provided by the independent auditors with the auditor’s independence.
The Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets with the internal and independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board of Directors has approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29, 201826, 2020 for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee and the Board has re-appointed, subject to stockholder approval, Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 28, 2019.25, 2021.
The Audit Committee is governed by a formal charter which can be accessed from the Company’s website at www.muellerindustries.comwww.muellerindustries. com, or may be requested in print by any stockholder. The members of the Audit Committee are considered independent because they satisfy the independence requirements for Board members prescribed by the NYSE listing standards and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.
Gennaro J. Fulvio, Chairman
Scott J. Goldman
John B. Hansen
(1) | This Section is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing. |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 22
ADVISORY VOTE ON APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, stockholders are being asked to vote on an advisory, non-binding basis, on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Specifically, the following resolution will be submitted for a stockholder vote at the Annual Meeting, the approval of which will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon:
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of the Company approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers listed in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table included in the proxy statement for the 2021 Annual Meeting, as such compensation is disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K in this proxy statement under the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” as well as the compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation disclosures thereafter.”
Although the stockholder vote is not binding on either the Board of Directors or the Company, the views of stockholders on these matters are valued and will be taken into account in addressing future compensation policies and decisions.
The Company’s Compensation and Stock Option Committee is comprised of knowledgeable and experienced independent directors, who are committed to regular review and effective oversight of our compensation programs. The Company’s executive compensation program is grounded in a pay for performance philosophy, and accordingly, has been designed to motivate the Company’s key employees to achieve the Company’s strategic and financial goals, and to support the creation of long-term value for stockholders. Moreover, given the particularly competitive markets in which we operate and nature of our business, a principal goal underlying the Company’s long-term incentive compensation program specifically is the long-term retention and motivation of critical executives and business leaders. The Company’s success depends upon their leadership, judgment and experience, and as such, our compensation program is designed to promote their enduring commitment to the Company. We encourage stockholders to read the Executive Compensation section of this proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) and compensation tables, for a more detailed discussion of the Company’s compensation programs and policies, and how they are appropriate and effective in promoting growth, creating value, and retaining key members of our team.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE THEIR SHARES FOR THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS. |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 23
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | 24 | ||
DETERMINATION OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 26 | ||
ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION | 27 | ||
COMPENSATION RISK MANAGEMENT | 32 |
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) provides an overview of how our named executive officers were compensated in 2020, as well as how this compensation furthers our established compensation philosophy and objectives.
Our Named Executive Officers
The Company’s NEOs for fiscal year 2020 were:
Our Compensation Philosophy and Guiding Principles
We believe in a pay for performance philosophy, such that a material portion of a named executive officer’s compensation is dependent upon both the short-term and long-term strategic and financial performance of the Company, considered in light of general economic and specific Company, industry, and competitive conditions. For 2020, we continued to reward named executive officers in a manner consistent with this philosophy by setting annual incentive targets based on the Company’s achievement of certain levels of operating income. While also rooted in a pay for performance philosophy, our long-term equity incentive compensation focused primarily on promoting the retention of key executives and business leaders in our industry, where the competition for leadership talent is a foremost concern. Accordingly, we continued to grant equity awards, such that any long-term compensation opportunity will be directly tied to stock performance, and will only be received by key executives and business leaders who remain with and make long-term commitments to the Company’s success. The Compensation and Stock Option Committee (hereinafter referred to as “the Committee” for purposes of this CD&A section) evaluates, on an annual basis, the overall structure and design of our program, and believes it has and continues to reflect the best balance of the Company’s priorities.
MUELLER INDUSTRIESREPORT • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 24
Our Compensation Practices At a Glance
Our pay and equity programs are designed to align executives’ interests with those of our stockholders, and to motivate and retain critical leaders. Below is a snapshot of our compensation practices:
WHAT WE DO | WHAT WE DON’T DO | |||
We maintain a fully independent Compensation and Stock Option Committee. | We do not provide for single trigger severance upon a change in control. | |||
A higher percentage of our executives’ compensation is variable than fixed. | We do not permit gross-up payments to cover excise taxes. | |||
We utilize varying performance metrics under our short-term and long-term incentive plans. | We do not permit the pledging or hedging of our common stock. | |||
Our annual incentive program is based on earnings performance and capped for maximum payouts. | We do not support compensation programs or policies that reward material or excessive risk taking. | |||
Our equity awards include extended vesting schedules and performance-based criteria. | We do not maintain any supplemental executive retirement plans. | |||
We have a clawback policy applicable to all senior employees, including all President and Vice President level personnel. |
2020 Say-on-Pay Vote and Stockholder Engagement
At our 2020 Annual Meeting, we held our annual non-binding stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation. Approximately 77% of our shares voted (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes) were in favor of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting.
Last year, in response to stockholder feedback, the Company not only endeavored to more clearly and fully present its compensation program, but also to dramatically revamp the look, format and substance of the 2020 proxy statement. Our goal in doing so was to provide a more useful tool to assist stockholders in evaluating our compensation program, including pay-for-performance alignment and whether it serves the vital strategic goal of attracting and retaining key executives in the competitive markets in which we participate. We were gratified that last year’s stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation reflected an improvement in support, but it was clear that there was more work to do in this regard.
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 25
Accordingly, we continued to engage with stockholders regarding the Company’s compensation practices and the philosophies underlying them. Those discussions afforded stockholders the opportunity to raise questions and concerns regarding the executive compensation program as presented in last year’s proxy solicitation. One specific aspect of the compensation program that was a particular focus was our long-term equity incentive program, and how the performance-based criterion underlying those equity awards were chosen to emphasize long-term strategic growth and to serve as a complement to the Company’s ambitious targets underlying its annual cash incentive program in an effort to create a balanced and well-rounded incentive structure. In response to that feedback, the Company implemented two reforms in 2020:
(1) | The Company revised the performance metric underlying the equity incentive awards given to Mr. Christopher and other key executive officers of the Company. Since the performance-based awards were implemented in 2016, the growth targets underlying such awards were based on 3.5% compounded annual growth rates in either total shareholder return (TSR) or earnings per share (EPS). In response to stockholder feedback regarding the appropriateness of these metrics, the Company reviewed the metrics utilized by industry peers and determined that for a business such as ours, operational based metrics would be a more effective gauge of our executives’ performance and driver of strategic growth. Accordingly, in 2020, the Company shifted to performance metrics based on growth in adjusted earnings before income tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and average return on invested capital, each as compared with specified targets and weighted on a 50%-50% basis. (For more details on the new performance metrics, please see the section entitled “Performance Criteria for Performance-Based Restricted Stock.”) |
(2) | As previously discussed by the Company, for the first time in 2020, the long-term equity incentive awards given to operational business leaders was tied to achievement of the ambitious targets set forth in the Company’s 2024 Strategic Growth Plan (the awards given to these members of the management team previously had no performance component). The Company believes that these revised criteria will serve as an effective motivator for our operational business leaders to drive their respective businesses and contribute toward the Company’s overall long-term strategic growth objectives. |
The Committee will consider the outcome of this year’s stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation as it makes future compensation decisions.
— DETERMINATION OF THE COMPENSATION AND STOCK OPTION COMMITTEEOF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Guided by the philosophy and design outlined above, the Committee determines the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer. In turn, our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Committee regarding all components of our other NEOs’ compensation, including base salary, annual cash incentive compensation, and long-term equity incentive compensation. The Committee considers and acts upon those recommendations in setting the compensation of our other NEOs.
In determining compensation, we generally do not rely upon hierarchical or seniority-based levels or guidelines, nor did the Committee formally benchmark executive compensation (or any component thereof) against any particular peer group. Instead, we utilize a more flexible approach that allows us to adapt components and levels of compensation to motivate and reward individual executives within the context of our broader strategic and financial goals. This requires that we consider subjective factors including, but not limited to the following:
• | The nature of the executive’s position; |
• | The performance record of the executive, combined with the value of the executive’s skills and capabilities in supporting the long-term performance of the Company; |
• | The Company’s overall operational and financial performance; and |
• | Whether each executive’s total compensation potential and structure is sufficient to ensure the retention of the executive officer when considering the compensation potential that may be available elsewhere. |
In making compensation decisions, the Committee relies on the members’ general knowledge of our industry, supplemented by advice from our Chief Executive Officer based on his knowledge of our industry and the markets in which we participate. From time to time, we conduct informal analyses of compensation practices and our Compensation and Stock Option Committee may review broad-based third-party surveys to obtain a general understanding of current compensation practices.
The Committee has chosen incentive operating income targets as the metric to measure performance for each named executive officer. The compensation of Messrs. Christopher, Martin and Miritello is based upon their oversight of and responsibility for the entire Company. Accordingly, their compensation levels are reflective of the scope and breadth of their management responsibility, and the performance of the Company on a consolidated basis. For Messrs. Sigloch and Westermeyer, a portion of their compensation is based upon the performance of specific business lines within their purviews. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a portion of their compensation is still based upon consolidated Company performance to discourage parochialism and align their interests with those of our stockholders.
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 26
As outlined below, our compensation program for our NEOs is comprised of three primary elements: (i) base salary and traditional benefits, (ii) annual incentive compensation, and (iii) long-term equity incentive compensation. Each element plays an integral role in our overall compensation strategy. Moreover, the Committee has approved certain executive perquisites and post-employment change-in-control compensation to our NEOs for purposes of motivating them and retaining their services.
Element of Compensation | Purpose/Description | Form/Timing of Payment | ||
Base Salary and traditional benefits | Provide a base level of compensation for services performed, to encourage the continued service of our executive officers and to attract additional talented executive officers when necessary | Cash/throughout the fiscal year | ||
Annual Incentive Compensation | To attract, motivate and reward executives to achieve and surpass key performance target goals | Cash/typically in February based upon the prior fiscal year’s performance | ||
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation | To attract, motivate and reward executives to increase stockholder value, and encourage them to make long-term commitments to serve the Company | Restricted stock units with performance and time vesting criterion/following the release of second quarter earnings |
Pay-for-Performance and At-Risk Compensation
Base Salary and Traditional Benefits
Base salaries paid to our NEOs are set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020.” Base salary adjustments are determined by making reasoned subjective determinations about current economic conditions such as general wage inflation as well as the executive’s qualifications, experience, responsibilities, and past performance. In addition to base salaries, we provide traditional benefits such as group health, disability, and life insurance benefits, as well as matching contributions to our 401(k) plan.
Annual Incentive Compensation
Each of our NEOs received annual incentive compensation for 2020, based upon the actual performance of the Company and, for Messrs. Sigloch and Westermeyer, the performance of the business lines which they oversee, relative to the performance targets (as described below) established by the Committee on February 5, 2020 (as reviewed and revised on July 31, 2020). The table below shows the target annual incentive award for each of our NEOs.
For 2020, the amount of incentive compensation payable to each of our named executive officers was calculated as follows:
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 27
INCENTIVE GRADE LEVEL FACTOR
Set forth below are the incentive grade level factors for each of our NEOs:
NEO | Multiple of Base Salary |
Mr. Christopher | 125% |
Mr. Martin | 90% |
Mr. Sigloch | 90% |
Mr. Miritello | 75% |
Mr. Westermeyer | 75% |
PERFORMANCE FACTOR
Set forth below are the corresponding payout percentages tied to various levels of achievement above or below pre-approved operating income performance targets. To promote alignment between pay and performance, incentive compensation amounts are not paid to NEOs when the achievement level of the operating income performance target is less than 80%.
Performance to Target | Payout Percentage |
< 80% | 0% |
80-84% | 40% |
85-89% | 55% |
90-94% | 70% |
95-99% | 85% |
100-102% | 100% |
103-105% | 115% |
106-109% | 130% |
110% | 150% |
Based on their incentive grade level factors, certain NEOs are entitled to an additional payout percentage of 10% for each additional percentage of achievement between 111% and 115% of the target, thereby resulting in a maximum payout percentage of 200%. For more information, please see the “2020 Grants of Plan Based Awards Table.”
The performance factor applicable to each of the NEOs was determined based on the achievement level of the consolidated Company incentive operating income target, as shown in the following table:
Name | Incentive Operating Income Performance Criteria(1) | Incentive Operating Income Performance Target | Weighting | Performance | 2020 Achievement Level | 2020 Performance Factor | ||||||
Gregory L. Christopher | Consolidated Company | $164.9 million | 100% | $217.1 million | 131% | 200% | ||||||
Jeffrey A. Martin | Consolidated Company | $164.9 million | 100% | $217.1 million | 131% | 200% | ||||||
Steffen Sigloch | Consolidated Company | $164.9 million | 75% | $217.1 million | 131% | 200% | ||||||
Blended Business Lines Weighted Average Performance | $15.9 million | 25% | $17.0 million | 107% | 130% | |||||||
Christopher J. Miritello | Consolidated Company | $164.9 million | 100% | $217.1 million | 131% | 200% | ||||||
Gary Westermeyer | Consolidated Company | $164.9 million | 25% | $217.1 million | 131% | 150% | ||||||
Blended Business Lines Weighted Average Performance | $17.8 million | 75% | $20.1 million | 113% | 150% |
(1) | Incentive operating income is the performance criteria metric used for all bonus plans. Incentive operating income includes adjustments to operating income as presented in the Company’s audited financial statements for purposes of defining the performance criteria, such as: (i) certain standard adjustments made annually, including expenses associated with phantom shares granted to personnel in our European businesses, and FIFO variances; and (ii) certain adjustments made when applicable, including impairment charges, certain gains or losses on the sale of assets, certain gains stemming from claim recoveries, consolidation related expenses and purchase accounting adjustments. |
The performance targets applicable to our NEOs were established by the Committee on February 5, 2020, before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and reflected a continuation of the execution of our growth strategy over the last several years. However, following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company continued to evaluate its financial performance, as well as employees’ contributions across the organization, and measured those against the key objectives of our executive compensation program, including pay for performance, alignment with stockholders’ interests, and motivation and retention of key talent, which includes maintaining a program that is a fair reflection of corporate and individual performance. Thus, in light of these key objectives, which are intended to position the Company for long term profitable growth, and the extraordinary circumstances caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, in July 2020, the Company recommended to the Committee that the incentive operating income targets that were originally established in February be adjusted to keep all employees, including our NEOs, motivated and focused on continuing to work towards advancing the Company’s long-term goals for the remainder of 2020. On that basis, the Committee determined to adjust the consolidated company and business line incentive operating income targets applicable to the NEOs down by 15%, which, in the Committee’s view, were challenging but achievable levels, such that, based on performance expectations at the time of the July adjustment (which, due in large part to the extraordinary circumstances
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 28
caused by COVID-19 pandemic, were trending below 2019 levels) the minimum incentive payout percentage could reasonably be attained.
From a financial performance standpoint in 2020, our NEOs and employees contributed to significant improvements in our third and fourth quarter earnings, and we concluded the year with results that were significantly better than our performance expectations at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and at the time of the July adjustment. As a result, notwithstanding the adjustment, which the Committee believes served the purpose of effectively motivating the Company’s NEOs and employees to overcome the unique challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, overall incentive payments as a percentage of the Company’s earnings were generally consistent with prior years.
2020 NEO ANNUAL INCENTIVE CALCULATIONS
As a result of 2020 performance, the annual incentive payments for the NEOs were calculated as follows:
(1) | The target award is determined by multiplying the NEO’s base salary by the applicable incentive grade level factor. |
Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation Program
OVERVIEW
Our long-term equity-based incentive compensation program serves three goals:
1. | Aligning our NEOs’ financial interests with the interests of our stockholders; |
2. | Retaining the services of talented and seasoned executives, and motivating them to make deep, long-term commitments to the Company; and |
3. | Rewarding our NEOs for advancing our long-term financial success and increasing stockholder value. |
The Committee has made the retention of executives and key employees a particular focus of the long-term equity incentive compensation program in recent years.
The Committee has decided that the best way to meet the objectives of our long-term incentive program is to award a combination of time-based restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock, allocated as shown below. To promote our goal of executive and key employee retention, time-based restricted stock awards vest over the course of a five-year period, on one of two vesting schedules: (i) 30% after three years; 30% after four years; and 40% after five years, or (ii) 100% cliff vesting after five years. Performance-based restricted stock is also awarded, and cliff vests after periods of either three or five years, provided performance criteria are met over the applicable performance period. All unvested shares are forfeited if the recipient leaves the Company’s employ prior to the vesting date.
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 29
The Committee believes that the extended and cliff vesting schedules, and performance criteria described below will motivate our NEOs and key employees to remain with the Company and make long-term contributions to stockholder value generation.
VESTING SCHEDULE FOR TIME-BASED AND PERFORMANCE-BASED RESTRICTED STOCK
To foster retention, the 2020 time-based restricted stock awards vest over the course of a five-year period (i.e., either (i) 30% after three years; 30% after four years; and 40% after five years, or (ii) 100% after five years). For performance-based awards given to certain NEOs in 2020 (i.e., Messrs. Christopher, Martin, Sigloch and Miritello), the performance period is three years, and vesting occurs three years from the grant date. For the performance-based awards given to Mr. Westermeyer and various operational business leaders in 2020, the performance period is the fiscal year ending December 28, 2024, and vesting occurs approximately four and a half years from the grant date. No portion of the equity awards granted to our executives or employees vest in less than three years. The Committee elected to use a long-term vesting schedule to promote executive retention in our competitive industry and to incentivize performance. However, given the importance of long-term equity incentive awards in our compensation program, the Committee provided for accelerated vesting in the event of death, disability or a change in control (as explained in more detail in the “2020 Grant of Plan Based Awards Table”). The Committee believes that accelerated vesting would be appropriate in those circumstances to encourage our executives to focus on the potential benefits of a change in control transaction for our stockholders without harboring concerns for their financial security.
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 30
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED RESTRICTED STOCK
A portion of the long-term equity awards granted to Messrs. Christopher, Martin, Sigloch and Miritello are performance-based, and vesting is contingent upon the Company’s performance on two metrics: (i) adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), and (ii) average return on invested capital (ROIC). As discussed above in the section entitled “2020 Say-on-Pay Vote and Stockholder Engagement,” the Company adopted these operational metrics in response to stockholder outreach regarding the appropriateness of the metrics historically used by the Company. Using these two metrics ensures that performance-based awards to these NEOs will only vest based upon the achievement of specified growth targets over a three-year performance period, which for the 2020 grants, was December 29, 2019 to December 31, 2022. For this purpose, the adjusted EBITDA metric means the average adjusted EBITDA achieved by the Company during each of the three fiscal years during the performance period, as compared with an adjusted EBITDA target of $204.0 million. The average ROIC metric means the average ROIC achieved by the Company during each of the three fiscal years during the performance period, as compared with an average ROIC target of 11.0%. For purposes of the average ROIC metric, ROIC means, in respect of a given fiscal year, the quotient obtained by dividing the Company’s after-tax operating income for such fiscal year by average invested capital in respect of such fiscal year (with invested capital being the average of beginning and ending long-term debt and equity in respect of such fiscal year).
The degree to which the performance-based equity awards granted to Messrs. Christopher, Martin, Sigloch and Miritello vest is contingent upon the Company’s actual performance as compared with the adjusted EBITDA and average ROIC targets, each weighted on a 50%-50% basis. The tables below illustrate the applicable achievement levels and corresponding vesting percentages for each metric. In both tables, the vesting percentages reflect the 50%-50% weighting of the two metrics. As for each metric, if the achievement percentage is less than 80%, the vesting percentage is 0%. Moreover, if the achievement percentage is between the specified levels, the vesting percentage is determined by linear interpolation.
ADJUSTED EBITDA METRIC | |
Achievement Percentage | Vesting Percentage |
80% | 25% |
110% | 100% |
AVERAGE ROIC METRIC | |
Achievement Percentage | Vesting Percentage |
80% | 25% |
110% | 100% |
For the performance-based equity awards granted to Mr. Westermeyer in 2020, the performance metric is the actual combined operating income of various businesses overseen by Mr. Westermeyer, as compared to a combined operating income target of $35.0 million during the fiscal year ending December 28, 2024. This performance period aligns with the final fiscal year
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 31
of our ambitious 2024 Strategic Growth Plan. The table below sets forth the various achievement percentages and corresponding vesting percentages. If the achievement percentage is less than 50%, the vesting percentage is 0%. Moreover, if the achievement percentage is between the specified levels, the vesting percentage is determined without linear interpolation.
Performance to Target | Payout Percentage |
50% | 25% |
60% | 40% |
70% | 55% |
80% | 70% |
90% | 85% |
100% | 100% |
To be clear, the growth targets established for our performance-based equity grants are just one of a number of different, yet complementary performance metrics utilized by the Company in its efforts to design an overall compensation program that is appropriately balanced and furthers its underlying aims. For example, the Company’s performance-based compensation program also incorporates the ambitious short and long-term operating targets that underlie the Company’s annual cash incentive compensation program and long-term aspirations for strategic growth.
The Company has traditionally maintained, and will continue to maintain lofty expectations and goals with respect to stockholder value creation. Nevertheless, given the primary retention aim of the long-term equity incentive compensation program, the Committee has concluded that the performance-based criterion for the equity awards granted to our NEOs are appropriate in the context of our well-balanced overall executive compensation program.
TIMING OF LONG-TERM EQUITY AWARD GRANTS
Long-term equity incentive awards to our Chief Executive Officer and other NEOs are traditionally granted annually, typically following the release of the Company’s second quarter and six-month operating results, and are based on the determinations of the Committee. Our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Committee regarding awards for other NEOs and members of the management team. In 2020, the NEOs received their annual grants in August.
In granting long-term equity awards to our NEOs, the Committee applied no set formula for allocating awards, and instead made reasoned, subjective determinations based upon their performance, the importance of retaining their services, and their role in helping us achieve our long-term goals. In 2020, we granted shares of restricted stock to our NEOs covering an aggregate of 141,000 shares.
Perquisites
We offer perquisites to our NEOs, which we view as an added element of our executive compensation program designed not only to attract, retain and reward our NEOs, but also to facilitate the performance of their duties on behalf of the Company. The perquisites we provided to our NEOs in fiscal year 2020 are set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020”, and included, among others, estate and tax planning, personal use of our Company airplane, and reimbursement of the income tax liabilities associated with certain perquisites. Estate and tax planning is provided to certain NEOs to complement our various compensation elements for the purpose of ensuring the NEOs understand the complexity of the long-term equity incentives and are thereby able to maximize the value of such benefits. We maintain a Company-owned airplane primarily to provide efficient transportation for executives, employees and customers to our geographically dispersed operations. From time to time, when our plane is not being used for business purposes, we allow certain NEOs to use the plane for personal travel. We have also provided executive physicals as a risk management tool and to ensure our NEOs are mindful of their personal health. Certain club memberships are provided, and serve the primary aim of facilitating networking with customers.
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 32
— COMPENSATION RISK MANAGEMENT
In connection with its continued appraisal of our compensation program, management, with oversight from the Committee, reviews our compensation policies and practices, and the overall compensation program with respect to our risk management practices and any potential risk-taking incentives. This assessment includes a review of the primary elements of our compensation in light of potential risks:
COMPENSATION PROGRAM RISK CONSIDERATIONS
Pay Mix | • Compensation program includes an appropriately balanced mix of short and long-term incentives, which mitigates the risk of undue focus on short-term targets while rewarding performance in areas that are key to our long-term success • Base salaries are set at competitive levels to promote stability and give executives an element of compensation that is not at risk. | |
Performance Metrics and Goals | • Distinct performance metrics are used in both our short-term and long-term incentive plans. • Our annual incentive compensation program includes a payout scale (and cap) reflective of a pay for performance philosophy. | |
Long-term Incentives | • Our long-term equity incentive program is designed to retain key executives and business leaders and to align their interests with those of our stockholders. |
As previously detailed (see page 17), the Company has adopted a series of policies, including bans on pledging and hedging, and a clawback policy, to further mitigate risk taking behaviors. Beyond our Company clawback policy, which applies to all President and Vice President-level executives, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are subject to clawback provisions under the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.For these reasons, we believe that our compensation policies and practices are not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Tax Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to certain executive officers, subject historically to an exception for qualifying “performance-based compensation.” The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, enacted on December 22, 2017, substantially modified Section 162(m) of the Code and, among other things, eliminated the performance-based exception to the $1,000,000 deduction limit effective as of January 1, 2018. As a result, as of 2018, compensation paid to certain executive officers in excess of $1,000,000 is nondeductible, whether or not it is performance-based. In addition, beginning in 2018, the executive officers subject to Section 162(m) of the Code (the “Covered Employees”) will include any individual who served as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer at any time during the taxable year and the three other most highly compensated officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) for the taxable year, and once an individual becomes a Covered Employee for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016, that individual will remain a Covered Employee for all future years, including following any termination of employment.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act includes a transition rule under which the changes to Section 162(m) of the Code described above will not apply to compensation payable pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017 and is not materially modified after that date. To the extent applicable to our existing contracts and awards, we may avail ourselves of this transition rule. However, because of uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of the transition rule, no assurances can be given at this time that our existing contracts and awards, even if in place on November 2, 2017, will meet the requirements of the transition rule. Moreover, to maintain flexibility in compensating executive officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals in the best interest of the company, we do not limit our actions with respect to executive compensation to preserve deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code if we determine that doing so is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 33
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION AND STOCK OPTION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The Compensation and Stock Option Committee has reviewed and discussed with the Company’s management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation and Stock Option Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
Gary S. Gladstein, Chairman
Scott J. Goldman
Charles P. Herzog, Jr.
— | COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION |
During fiscal year 2020, Gennaro J. Fulvio, Scott J. Goldman and Charles P. Herzog, Jr. served on the Compensation and Stock Option Committee. No member of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee was, during fiscal year 2020, an officer or employee of the Company or was formerly an officer of the Company. In addition, no member of the Compensation and Stock Option Committee, during fiscal year 2020, had any relationship requiring disclosure by the Company as a related party transaction under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. No executive officer of the Company served on any board of directors or compensation committee of any other company for which any of the Company’s directors served as an executive officer at any time during fiscal year 2020.
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 34
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES |
— SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR 2020
The following table shows compensation of our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, and other named executive officers for the 2020, 2019 and 2018 fiscal years, as applicable.
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary ($) | Bonus ($) | Stock Awards ($)(1) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | All Other Compensation ($) | Total ($) | |||||||
Gregory L. Christopher | 2020 | 1,250,000 | (2) | 300,000 | (3) | 2,220,750 | 3,125,000 | 337,398 | (4) | 7,233,148 | ||||
Chief Executive Officer & Chairman | 2019 | 1,250,000 | — | 4,168,400 | 2,031,250 | 615,056 | 8,064,706 | |||||||
2018 | 1,117,308 | — | 3,873,600 | 1,815,625 | 543,480 | 7,350,013 | ||||||||
Jeffrey A. Martin | 2020 | 400,125 | (2) | 300,000 | (3) | 681,030 | 720,225 | 85,802 | (5) | 2,187,182 | ||||
Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer | 2019 | 390,462 | — | 490,770 | 456,840 | 202,895 | 1,540,967 | |||||||
2018 | 359,873 | — | 581,040 | 421,052 | 68,553 | 1,430,518 | ||||||||
Steffen Sigloch | 2020 | 344,177 | (2) | — | 651,420 | 516,266 | 127,321 | (6) | 1,639,184 | |||||
Chief Manufacturing Officer | 2019 | 339,085 | — | 627,095 | 326,921 | 242,766 | 1,535,867 | |||||||
2018 | 328,693 | — | 807,000 | 384,571 | 227,048 | 1,747,312 | ||||||||
Christopher J. Miritello | ||||||||||||||
Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary(7) | 2020 | 330,000 | (2) | 325,000 | (3) | 177,660 | 495,000 | 34,680 | (8) | 1,362,340 | ||||
Gary Westermeyer | 2020 | 265,000 | (2) | — | 444,150 | 268,313 | 15,180 | (10) | 992,643 | |||||
President – Refrigeration(9) | 2019 | 263,558 | 60,000 | 272,650 | 195,197 | 17,015 | 808,420 |
(1) | This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of awards granted to our NEOs and assuming, for purposes of any awards subject to performance-based vesting criteria, the probable outcome of the performance conditions. For information on the valuation assumptions with respect to these awards, refer to Note 17 - Stock-Based Compensation to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements filed with its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2020. The amounts above reflect the Company’s aggregate expense for these awards and do not necessarily correspond to the actual value the named executive officers will recognize. |
(2) | Effective December 21, 2020, Mr. Martin’s, Mr. Sigloch’s and Mr. Westermeyer’s base salaries were increased by 6.3%, 6.1% and 5.7% respectively. Mr. Miritello’s base salary was increased by 10.0% effective January 1, 2020. Mr. Christopher did not receive any base salary increase in 2020. |
(3) | Represents cash bonuses awarded to Messrs. Christopher, Martin and Miritello in recognition of their outstanding leadership and service, particularly as it related to the Company’s successful claim in the Deepwater Horizon settlement, which resulted in the Company’s collection of an approximately $22.1 million award. |
(4) | Mr. Christopher’s other compensation includes $230,480 in restricted stock dividends, including the Special Dividend (as discussed below) in respect of shares of restricted stock that were unvested at the time the Special Dividend was declared and that vested in 2020. Other compensation also includes $18,315 in premiums on a life insurance policy maintained on his behalf; a $15,803 reimbursement of the income tax liabilities associated with certain perquisites; $9,774 in club memberships; $12,253 in personal tax and estate planning; a $191 executive health physical; $3,238 in travel expenses for Company-sponsored events; and an $11,400 matching contribution to the Company’s 401(k) plan. In addition, Mr. Christopher’s other compensation includes the incremental cost of $35,944 incurred by the Company in connection with Mr. Christopher’s personal use of the Company aircraft, calculated based on the cost of fuel, crew travel, trip-related maintenance and other similar variable costs. Fixed costs, which do not change based on usage, are excluded as the Company’s aircraft is used predominantly for business purposes. |
(5) | Mr. Martin’s other compensation includes $73,105 in restricted stock dividends, including the Special Dividend in respect of shares of restricted stock that were unvested at the time the Special Dividend was declared and that vested in 2020. Other compensation also includes a $511 reimbursement of the income tax liabilities associated with certain perquisites; an $11,400 matching contribution to the Company’s 401(k) plan; and the incremental cost of $787 incurred by the Company in connection with Mr. Martin’s personal use of the Company aircraft (see Note 4 above for an explanation of the calculation of such cost). |
(6) | Mr. Sigloch’s other compensation includes $106,445 in restricted stock dividends, including the Special Dividend in respect of shares of restricted stock that were unvested at the time the Special Dividend was declared and that vested in 2020. Other compensation also includes an $11,400 matching contribution to the Company’s 401(k) plan, $5,700 in relocation expenses and a $3,729 reimbursement of the income tax liabilities associated with certain perquisites. |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 35
(7) | Mr. Miritello was not a NEO in 2018 or 2019. Accordingly, only his compensation for 2020 is listed on this table. |
(8) | Mr. Miritello’s other compensation includes $23,280 in restricted stock dividends, including the Special Dividend in respect of shares of restricted stock that were unvested at the time the Special Dividend was declared and that vested in 2020. Other compensation also includes an $11,400 matching contribution to the Company’s 401(k) plan. |
(9) | Mr. Westermeyer was not a NEO in 2018. Accordingly, only his compensation for 2019 and 2020 is listed on this table. |
(10) | Mr. Westermeyer’s other compensation includes $3,780 in restricted stock dividends, including the Special Dividend in respect of shares of restricted stock that were unvested at the time the Special Dividend was declared and that vested in 2020. Other compensation also includes an $11,400 matching contribution to the Company’s 401(k) plan. |
Pay Ratio
In 2020, the total compensation of Mr. Christopher, our Chief Executive Officer, was $7,233,148, as reported in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020.” Based on the methodology described below, we determined that the median employee in terms of total 2020 compensation of all of our employees (other than Mr. Christopher) received an estimated $36,810 in total compensation for 2020. Therefore, the estimated ratio of 2020 total compensation of Mr. Christopher to the median employee was 197:1.
In general, we offer employees base salary, company retirement plan contributions, the opportunity to receive incentive awards for performance, and other benefits. In accordance with SEC rules, the median employee compensation provided above reflects company retirement plan contributions, incentive awards for 2020 performance and other benefits, but does not reflect benefits relating to group life or health plans generally available to all salaried employees.
To determine median employee compensation, we took the following steps:
• | We identified our employee population as of December 26, 2020, which consisted of approximately 5,007 employees. |
• | For each employee (other than Mr. Christopher), we determined the sum of his or her base salary for 2020, and incentive awards for 2020. Comparing the sums, we identified an employee whose compensation best reflects the Company employees’ median 2020 compensation, taking into account whether their compensation likely would reflect median employee compensation in future years. |
• | In accordance with SEC rules, we then determined that employee’s 2020 total compensation was $36,810 using the approach required by the SEC when calculating our named executive officers’ compensation, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table. |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 36
—Table of Contents
APPOINTMENT2020 GRANTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICPLAN BASED AWARDS TABLEACCOUNTING FIRM
Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) has been reappointed by the Audit Committee to audit and certify the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 28, 2019, subject to ratification by the Company’s stockholders. Ratification of the appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. If the appointment of EY is not ratified by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting, the Audit Committee will reconsider its action and will appoint auditors for the 2019 fiscal year without further stockholder action. Further, even if the appointment is ratified by stockholder action, the Audit Committee may at any time in the future in its discretion reconsider the appointment without submitting the matter to a vote of stockholders. It is expected that representatives of EY will be in attendance at the Annual Meeting and will be available to answer questions and to make a statement if they desire to do so.
The following table sets forth fees for professional services rendered by EY for the auditsummary information regarding all grants of the Company’s annual financial statements for each of the two fiscal years ended December 29, 2018 and December 30, 2017 and fees for other services rendered by EY during those periods:
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
Audit Fees | $ | 2,893,000 | $ | 2,481,000 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees | 219,730 | 133,000 | ||||||
Tax Fees | 348,699 | 336,000 | ||||||
All Other Fees | — | — | ||||||
$ | 3,461,429 | $ | 2,950,000 |
Audit Fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s consolidated annual financial statements and review of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by EY in connection with statutory filings. Audit Fees also include fees for professional services rendered for the audits of internal control over financial reporting in 2018 and 2017.
Audit-Related Fees include fees billed for assurance and other services not included in audit fees. The fees for 2018 and 2017 were for international accounting and reporting compliance.
Tax Fees include fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning matters.
The Audit Committee’s policy isplan-based awards made to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services. The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its Chairman when expedition of services is necessary. The independent auditors and management are required periodically to report to the full Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent auditors in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. All of the services provided by the independent auditors during fiscal years 2018 and 2017, respectively, under the categories Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees described above were pre-approved.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE THEIR SHARESFOR THE APPROVAL OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.
ADVISORY VOTE ON APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THECOMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, stockholders are being asked to vote on an advisory, non-binding basis, on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. This advisory vote gives stockholders another mechanism to convey their views about the Company’s compensation programs and policies.
The Company’s Compensation and Stock Option Committee is composed of knowledgeable and experienced independent directors, who are committed to regular review and effective oversight of our compensation programs. The Company’s executive compensation program has been designed to motivate the Company’s key employees to achieve the Company’s strategic and financial goals and to support the creation of long-term value for stockholders. The Company’s compensation policies and practices are centered on a pay for performance philosophy and reflect the belief that the Company’s success continues to depend in substantial part upon its ability to attract and retain qualified executive officers. We encourage stockholders to read the Executive Compensation section of this proxy statement, including the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis and compensation tables, for a more detailed discussion of the Company’s compensation programs and policies and how they are appropriate and effective in creating value.
The following resolution will be submitted for a stockholder vote at the Annual Meeting. Stockholder approval of this proposal will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon. Although the stockholder vote on executive compensation is not binding on the Board of Directors or the Company, the Company values the views of its stockholders. The Board of Directors and Compensation and Stock Option Committee will review the results of the vote and take them into consideration in addressing future compensation policies and decisions.
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of the Company approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers listed infor the 2018fiscal year ended December 26, 2020.
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock | Grant Date Fair Value of | |||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Threshold ($) | Target ($) | Maximum ($) | Threshold (#) | Target (#) | Maximum (#) | or Units (#)(3) | Stock Awards ($) | |||||||||
Gregory L. Christopher | — | 625,000 | 1,562,500 | 3,125,000 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
8/7/2020 | — | — | — | — | 30,000 | — | 45,000 | 2,220,750 | ||||||||||
Jeffrey A. Martin | — | 144,045 | 360,113 | 720,225 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
8/7/2020 | — | — | — | — | 8,000 | — | 15,000 | 681,030 | ||||||||||
Steffen Sigloch | — | 123,904 | 309,759 | 619,519 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
8/7/2020 | — | — | — | — | 10,000 | — | 12,000 | 651,420 | ||||||||||
Christopher J. Miritello | — | 99,900 | 247,500 | 495,000 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
8/7/2020 | — | — | — | — | 2,000 | — | 4,000 | 177,660 | ||||||||||
Gary Westermeyer | — | 79,500 | 198,750 | 298,125 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
8/7/2020 | — | — | — | — | 10,000 | — | 5,000 | 444,150 |
(1) | Represents annual cash incentive awards that could have been earned based on performance in 2020. These columns show awards that were possible at the threshold, target and maximum levels of performance for each NEO in 2020, determined by multiplying each named executive officer’s actual base salary paid during 2020, by the named executive officer’s incentive grade level factor, and then by a performance factor of 40% for the threshold level (for 80% achievement of the applicable performance criteria), 100% for the target level (for 100% achievement of the applicable performance criteria), capped at 200% (or, in the case of Mr. Westermeyer, 150%) for the maximum level (for 115% achievement of the applicable performance criteria). |
(2) | The vesting of shares of performance-based restricted stock granted to Messrs. Christopher, Martin, Sigloch and Miritello in 2020 is conditioned upon the Company’s actual performance as compared with certain adjusted EBITDA and average ROIC targets, each weighted on a 50%-50% basis, over a three-year reference period (December 29, 2019 to December 31, 2022). Subject to this performance condition, these shares will vest on July 20, 2023. The vesting of shares of performance-based restricted stock granted to Mr. Westermeyer in 2020 is conditioned upon the operating income performance of various businesses overseen by Mr. Westermeyer as compared to an operating income target during the fiscal year ending December 28, 2024. Subject to this performance condition, these shares will vest on February 28, 2025. For more information on the performance-based criteria, please see the section entitled “Performance Criteria for Performance-Based Restricted Stock.” |
(3) | Shares of time-based restricted stock granted to Messrs. Christopher and Martin will vest 30% on each of July 30, 2023 and July 30, 2024, and 40% on July 30, 2025. Shares of time-based restricted stock granted to Messrs. Sigloch, Miritello and Westermeyer will vest 100% on July 30, 2025. They are subject to earlier vesting in connection with a change in control, or a termination of employment due to death or disability. Mr. Christopher’s grants also vest upon a termination of employment without cause or resignation for good reason. |
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table included in the proxy statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting, as such compensation is disclosed pursuant to Item 402and Grant of Regulation S-K in this proxy statement under the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” as well as the compensation tables and other narrative executive compensation disclosures thereafter.”Plan Based Awards Table
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE THEIR SHARESFORTHE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
APPROVAL OF THE 2019 INCENTIVE PLAN
The Company seeks stockholder approval of the Mueller Industries, Inc. 2019 Incentive Plan (the “2019 Incentive Plan”), which, if approved by our stockholders, will enable the Company to make future stock-based awards in furtherance of its broader compensation strategy, as discussed below.
BackgroundEmployment Agreement with Mr. Christopher
On March 13, 15, 2018, we entered into an indefinite term employment agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) with Mr. Christopher, pursuant to which he will continue to serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, reporting directly to the Board. The Employment Agreement replaced Mr. Christopher’s prior employment agreement and, in so doing, eliminated the “single-trigger” severance to which Mr. Christopher would have been entitled upon the occurrence of a change in control of the Company.
The Employment Agreement provides that Mr. Christopher will receive a base salary of not less than $1,100,000 per year and will be eligible to receive an annual bonus award. For each fiscal year, Mr. Christopher’s target annual bonus will be 125% of his base salary upon achievement of target performance levels, and he will be eligible for a maximum annual bonus of 250% of base salary when performance equals or exceeds 125% of the applicable performance objectives. The actual annual bonus payable to Mr. Christopher will be based upon the actual level of achievement of annual Company and individual performance objectives for the applicable year, as determined by the Committee. In addition, during the term of Mr. Christopher’s employment, the Company will maintain a term life insurance policy for him with a face value of at least $5 million, and Mr. Christopher will have the right to name the beneficiary of such term life insurance policy.
In the event that Mr. Christopher’s employment is terminated for any reason (other than by the Company for “cause” (as defined in the Employment Agreement)), he will, subject to his execution of a general release in favor of the Company and his continued compliance with certain restrictive covenants (the “Conditions”), be entitled to receive the following: (i) any accrued but unpaid compensation and benefits; (ii) any unpaid annual bonus with
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 37
respect to the previously completed fiscal year; (iii) subject to achievement of the applicable performance objectives for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, payment of a prorated annual bonus for such fiscal year; and (iv) continued medical, dental and hospitalization coverage (or payment in lieu of coverage if coverage is not permitted by applicable law or the terms of the applicable plan) for Mr. Christopher, his spouse and covered dependents until the latest of Mr. Christopher’s 70th birthday, his spouse’s 70th birthday, and the 3rd anniversary of such termination.
Additionally, if Mr. Christopher’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Christopher for “good reason” (as defined in the Employment Agreement), and there has not been a “change in control” (as defined in the Employment Agreement) in the past 24 months, Mr. Christopher will, subject to the Conditions, be entitled to (i) continued payment of his base salary for 36 months; and (ii) an amount equal to 3 times Mr. Christopher’s target annual bonus in respect of the fiscal year in which such termination occurs (or prior fiscal year, if greater), such amount to be paid in equal installments over the 3-year period following such termination at the same time such amounts would otherwise have been paid had no termination occurred. If Mr. Christopher’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Christopher for “good reason” within 24 months of a “change in control,” Mr. Christopher will, subject to the Conditions, be entitled to (i) payment of his base salary for 36 months in a lump sum on the first regularly-scheduled payroll date following the 60th day following such termination; and (ii) an amount equal to 3 times Mr. Christopher’s target annual bonus in respect of the fiscal year in which such termination occurs (or prior fiscal year, if greater), paid in a lump sum on the first regularly-scheduled payroll date following the 60th day following such termination. The Employment Agreement does not provide for any “single-trigger” severance payments or benefits.
The Employment Agreement does not provide any gross-up or tax assistance on the severance benefits. Instead, the Employment Agreement contains a “modified cutback” provision, which would act to reduce the benefits payable to Mr. Christopher to the extent necessary to avoid a “golden parachute excise tax,” but only if such reduction would result in Mr. Christopher retaining a larger after-tax amount.
Mr. Christopher is subject to certain restrictive covenants during the term of his employment and thereafter, including customary non-compete restrictions that apply for one year post-termination and customary non-solicitation restrictions with respect to current and prospective employees that apply for one year post-termination. In addition, during the term of his employment and for one year thereafter, Mr. Christopher is prohibited from contacting any customer or prospective customer of the Company, or any representative of the same, for the purpose of providing any service or product competitive with any service or product sold or provided by the Company.
Change in Control Agreements with Messrs. Martin, Sigloch and Miritello
On July 26, 2016, the Company entered into change in control agreements with certain key members of the management team, including Messrs. Martin and Sigloch. The Company entered into a substantially similar change in control agreement with Mr. Miritello on January 3, 2017. Pursuant to those agreements, if, upon or within two years following a “change in control”, the executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” (other than on account of death or Disability), or by the executive for “good reason”, subject to execution of a general release of claims, the executive will be entitled to: (i) an amount equal to two times the executive’s base salary (as in effect immediately prior to the change in control or, if greater, the date of such termination); and (ii) an amount equal to two times the average annual bonus paid to the executive (including, for this purpose only, any amounts deferred) in respect of the three calendar years immediately preceding the calendar year in which the change in control occurs (or the three calendar years immediately preceding the calendar year of such termination, if greater). The terms “change in control” and “cause” are defined in the 2014 Incentive Plan and the term “good reason” is defined in each executive’s change in control agreement. The agreements also provide that for two years following termination under the circumstances described above, each of Messrs. Martin, Sigloch and Miritello will receive (subject to the executive’s election of COBRA continuation coverage under the Company’s group health plan) continued coverage under the Company’s group health plan at the Company’s cost (or at the direction of the Company, reimbursement for COBRA premiums) for two years following such termination. We are not party to an employment or change in control agreement with Mr. Westermeyer.
2019 the Board of Directors adoptedand 2014 Incentive Plans
In 2020, we maintained the 2019 Incentive Plan subject to approval by the Company’s stockholders. The adoption of the 2019 Incentive Plan will not affect the terms and conditions of any outstanding awards granted under the 2014 Incentive Plan. If the 2019 Incentive Plan is not approved
by the stockholders, the 2019 Incentive Plan will be null and void, and the 2014 Incentive Plan will remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms and conditions until May 1, 2024. The 2019 Incentive Plan provides for(together, the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and other stock-based awards (collectively, “awards”“Plans”) to our current and prospective employees, non-employee members of the Board of Directors, and other service providers. No awards will be granted pursuant to the 2019 Incentive Plan until it is, which were approved by the Company’s stockholders.
If theour stockholders at our Annual Meetings held in May 2019 Incentive Plan is approved, the Company will be authorized to issue 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock, which represents approximately 3.5% of our outstanding Common Stock (on a fully diluted basis) as of December 29, 2018. The Company’s stockholders have previously approved (i) the Company’s 2009 Stock Incentive Plan, pursuant to which, as of February 12, 2019, all remaining shares granted thereunder expired, and (ii) the Company’sMay 2014 Incentive Plan, pursuant to which, as of December 29, 2018, approximately 212,000 shares remained available for grant, plus the number of shares subject to awards under the 2014 Incentive Plan that are ultimately not delivered to participants. The Company will continue to maintain the 2014 Incentive Plan, whether or not the 2019 Incentive Plan is approved.
The Compensation Committee expects to continue to make equity award grants on an annual basis. The Board of Directors adopted the 2019 Incentive Plan because the number of shares currently available for grant under the 2014 Incentive Plan is insufficient to support the Company’s desire to compensate its named executive officers and other employees, as well as future employees, with equity-based compensation, which the Company believes has been successful in aligning the interests of employees and the senior management team with those of the stockholders and instrumental in the Company’s ability to attract, motivate and retain team members. Based on a review of the Company’s historical practices, the Board of Directors believes that the amounts available under the 2019 Incentive Plan will be sufficient to cover equity awards for participants for the next four to five years. In 2016, 2017 and 2018, the number of shares of Common Stock underlying equity awards granted (including stock options and shares of restricted stock) was approximately 289,000, 374,000, and 418,000 shares, respectively. The Compensation Committee expects to continue to grant awards underadministers the 2019 Incentive Plan consistent with the Company’s historical share utilization rates.
The Board of Directors believes that the 2019 Incentive Plan will serve a critical role in attractingPlans and retaining the high caliber employees essential to the Company’s success and in motivating these individuals to enhance our growth and profitability. The Board of Directors also believes that stock ownership by employees provides performance incentives and fosters long-term commitment to our benefit and to the benefit of our stockholders. Therefore, the Board of Directors urges stockholders to approve the 2019 Incentive Plan.
The following is a summary of the material features of the 2019 Incentive Plan, the complete text of which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A.
Purpose
The 2019 Incentive Plan is designed to aid in the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified individuals to become and remain employees, officers, directors and consultants of the Company, and to promote the creation of long-term value for the Company’s stockholders by aligning the interests of such individuals with those of the stockholders. Given the entrepreneurial culture of the Company, the Compensation Committee and Board of Directors believe that talented employees create a competitive advantage and that recruiting, motivating, and retaining such talented employees requires that such individuals have a vested interest in the long-term success of the business. Accordingly, the Board of Directors has adopted the 2019 Incentive Plan as a part its broader compensation strategy, which has been and will continue to have a material portion of compensation in the form of long-term incentive opportunities.
Administration
The 2019 Incentive Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee will have the authorityauthorized to, among other things, designate participants, grant awards, including cash-based awards that historically were intended to qualify as performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, determine the number of shares of Common Stock to be covered by awards and determine the terms and conditions of any awards, and construe and interpret the 2019Plans and award agreements issued pursuant thereto. The 2014 Incentive Plan and related award agreements. The Compensation Committee is also permitted to delegate its authority under the 2019 Incentive Plan to officers or employeesreserved 1,500,000 shares of the Company, although any award granted to any person who is not an employee of the Company or who is subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act must be expressly approved by the Compensation Committee.
Shares Subject to the 2019 Incentive Plan
The Company has authorized 2,000,000 shares ofour Common Stock for issuance, pursuant to awards under the 2019 Incentive Plan, which, as of March 15, 2019, had a fair market value of $31.94 per share. As discussed above, this proposed share reserve is based on the Company’s projections of internal share requirements over the next several years to provide competitive and meaningful long-term incentive opportunities to employees of the Company. Awards and the shares authorized under the 2019 Incentive Plan are subject to adjustment as described below under “Changes in Capital Structure.” Stock-based awards assumed or substituted by the Company or its affiliates as part of a corporate transaction (including from an entity that the Company merges with or into, acquires, or engages with in a similar corporate transaction) will not count against the number of shares of common stock reserved and available for issuance pursuant to the 2019 Incentive Plan except as may be required by Section 422 of the Code. If any award granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan expires or is canceled, forfeited, settled in cash or otherwise terminated without delivery of shares to a participant, the undelivered shares will again become available for awards under the 2019 Incentive Plan.
Eligibility
The following individuals will be eligible to participate in the 2019 Incentive Plan: (i) each employee and officer of the Company or its affiliates, of which there are currently approximately 5,134, (ii) each non-employee director of the Company or its affiliates, of which there are currently eight, (iii) individuals who are not employees or directors of the Company or its affiliates but nonetheless provide substantial services to the Company or its affiliates, and who are designated as eligible by the Compensation Committee, and (iv) prospective employees of the Company or its affiliates, although such individuals may not receive any payment or exercise any rights relating to awards until they have actually commenced employment.
Grants of Awards
The Compensation Committee may grant awards of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, and other stock-based awards. Awards will vest in accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreement. In addition, no
dividends or dividend equivalents will be paid on unvested awards, stock options or stock appreciation rights, or on vested restricted stock units prior to the actual delivery of shares of Common Stock.
Stock Options.The 2019 Incentive Plan provides for the grant of both incentive stock options, within the meaning of Section 422(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, and non-qualified stock options. A stock option granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan provides a participant with the right to purchase, within a specified period of time, a stated number of shares of Common Stock at the price specified in the applicable award agreement. The exercise price applicable to a stock option will be set by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant, and to the extent intended to (i) avoid treatment as a “stock right” that does not provide for a “deferral of compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) be an incentive stock option, will not be less than the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant. In the case of a stock option that is a “substitute award” (as such term is defined in the 2019 Incentive Plan), the exercise price for such stock option may be less than the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant provided that such exercise price is determined in a manner consistent with the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and, if applicable, Section 424(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. Further, stock options may not be repriced without stockholder approval. Stock options will vest over a period of at least one year, in accordance with the terms of the applicable award agreement. The maximum term of an option granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan is ten years from the date of grant (or five years in the case of an incentive stock option granted to a 10% stockholder). Payment of the exercise price of an option may be made in cash, Common Stock, pursuant to a broker-assisted cashless exercise in accordance with procedures approved by the Compensation Committee, pursuant to a delivery of a notice of “net exercise,” or in any other form of consideration approved by the Compensation Committee. The 2019 Incentive Plan provides that participants terminated for “cause” (as such term is defined in the 2019 Incentive Plan) will forfeit all of their stock options, whether or not vested. In addition, participants terminated by reason of a “qualifying retirement” (as such term is defined in the 2019 Incentive Plan) will have their stock options continue to vest according to schedule and such options will remain exercisable until they expire. Participants terminated for any other reason will forfeit their unvested options, retain their vested options, and will have one year (in the case of a termination by reason of death or disability) or 90 days (in all other cases) following
their termination date to exercise their vested options. The 2019 Incentive Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee to provide for different treatment of stock options upon termination than that described above, as determined in its discretion.
No incentive stock options may be granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan following the 10th anniversary of the earlier of (i) the date the 2019 Incentive Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors and (ii) the date the stockholders of the Company approve the 2019 Incentive Plan.
Stock Appreciation Rights. A stock appreciation right is a conditional right to receive an amount equal to the value of the appreciation in the Common Stock over a specified period. Except under extraordinary circumstances, at the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, or pursuant to the 2019 Incentive Plan, stock appreciation rights will be settled in shares of Common Stock. The base price applicable to a stock appreciation right will be set by the Compensation Committee at the time of grant, and to the extent intended to avoid treatment as a “stock right” that does not provide for a “deferral of compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, will not be less than the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant. In the case of a stock appreciation right that is a “substitute award” (as such term is defined in the 2019 Incentive Plan), the base price for such stock appreciation right may be less than the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant provided that such base price is determined in a manner consistent with the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The maximum term of a stock appreciation right granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan is ten years from the date of grant. Upon exercise of a stock appreciation right, payment in respect of such stock appreciation right may be made in cash, Common Stock, or property as specified in the applicable award agreement or as determined by the Compensation Committee, in each case having a value in respect of each share of Common Stock underlying the portion of the stock appreciation right so exercised, equal to the difference between the base price of such stock appreciation right and the fair market value of one share of Common Stock on the exercise date. The 2019 Incentive Plan provides that participants terminated for “cause” (as such term is defined in the 2019 Incentive Plan) will forfeit all of their stock appreciation rights, whether or not vested. In addition, participants terminated by reason of a “qualifying retirement” (as such term is defined in the 2019 Incentive Plan) will have their stock appreciation rights continue to vest according to schedule and such
stock appreciation rights will remain exercisable until they expire. Participants terminated for any other reason will forfeit their unvested stock appreciation rights, retain their vested stock appreciation rights, and will have one year (in the case of a termination by reason of death or disability) or 90 days (in all other cases) following their termination date to exercise their vested stock appreciation rights. The 2019 Incentive Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee to provide for different treatment of stock appreciation rights upon termination than that described above, as determined in its discretion.
Restricted Stock. An award of restricted stock is a grant of shares of Common Stock which are subject to limitations on transfer during a restricted period established in the applicable award agreement. Generally speaking, holders of restricted stock will generally have the rights and privileges of a stockholder with respect to their restricted stock. Except as otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee, in the event a participant is terminated for any reason, the vesting with respect to the participant’s restricted stock will cease, and as soon as practicable following the termination, the Company will repurchase all of such participant’s unvested shares of restricted stock at a purchase price equal to the original purchase price paid for the restricted stock, or if the original purchase price is equal to $0, the unvested shares of restricted stock will be forfeited by the participant to the Company for no consideration.
Restricted Stock Units. The Compensation Committee may award restricted stock units under the 2019 Incentive Plan, which are notional units representing the right to receive one share of Common Stock (or the cash value of one share of Common Stock) on a specified settlement date. When a participant satisfies the conditions of the restricted stock unit award, which the Compensation Committee will establish in the applicable award agreement, the Company may settle the award in shares, cash or property, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. Except as otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee, in the event a participant is terminated for any reason, the vesting with respect to the participant’s restricted stock units will cease, each of the participant’s outstanding unvested restricted stock units will be forfeited for no consideration as of the date of such termination, and any shares remaining undelivered with respect to the participant’s vested restricted stock units will be delivered on the delivery date specified in the applicable award agreement.
Other Stock-Based Awards. The 2019 Incentive Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee to grant other awards that may be denominated in, payable in, valued in, or otherwise related to shares of Common Stock. Such awards and the terms applicable to such awards will be set forth in award agreements.
General. All awards granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan will be subject to incentive compensation clawback and recoupment policies implemented by the Board of Directors from time to time. In addition, the Compensation Committee may adopt such procedures and sub-plans as are necessary or appropriate to permit participation in the 2019 Incentive Plan by individuals who are non-United States nationals or are primarily employed or providing services outside the United States, and may modify the terms of any awards granted to such participants in a manner deemed by the Compensation Committee to be necessary or appropriate in order that such awards conform with the laws of the country or countries where such participants are located.
No Repricing of Awards. No awards may be repriced without shareholder approval. For purposes of the 2019 Incentive Plan, “repricing” means any of the following: (i) changing the terms of the award to lower its exercise price or base price (other than on account of capital adjustments as described below under “Changes in Capital Structure”), (ii) any other action that is treated as a repricing under “generally accepted accounting principles,” and (iii) repurchasing for cash or canceling an award in exchange for another award at a time when its exercise price or base price is greater than the fair market value of the underlying Common Stock.
Changes in Capital Structure
In the event of any change in the outstanding Common Stock or the capital structure of the Company the declaration of any extraordinary dividend, or any change in applicable lawsother similar corporate transaction or circumstances which results or could result in the substantial dilution or enlargement of participants’ rights under theevent. The 2019 Incentive Plan the Compensation Committee shall adjust the aggregate number ofreserved 2,000,000 shares of our Common Stock which may be granted pursuantfor issuance, subject to awards, the number of shares of Common Stock covered by outstanding awardsadjustments under the 2019 Incentive Plan, and the per-share price of outstanding awards under the 2019 Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, provide that an adjustment take the form of a cash payment to the holder of an outstanding award with respect to allsimilar circumstances.
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 38
—Table of ContentsOUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL 2020 YEAR-END
or part of an outstanding award, which payment will be subject to such terms and conditions (including timing of payment(s), vesting and forfeiture conditions) as the Compensation Committee may determine in its sole discretion.
Corporate Events
Under the 2019 Incentive Plan, unless otherwise provided in an award agreement, in the event of a “corporate event” (as defined in the 2019 Incentive Plan), the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, provide for any one or more of the following: (i) require that outstanding awards be assumed or substituted in connection with such event, (ii) accelerate the vesting of any outstanding awards upon the consummation of such event, (iii) cancel outstanding awards upon the consummation of such event and provide award holders with the per-share consideration being received by the Company’s stockholders in connection with such event in exchange for their awards, (iv) cancel all outstanding stock options, stock appreciation rights and other awards subject to exercise, whether vested or unvested, not assumed or substituted in connection with such event as of the consummation of such event, and provide award holders at least 10 days to exercise each such stock option, stock appreciation right or other such exercisable award, as applicable, or (v) replace outstanding awards with a cash incentive program that preserves the value of the replaced awards and contains identical vesting conditions.
Non-Transferability of Awards
Except as otherwise provided by the Compensation Committee, the 2019 Incentive Plan provides that awards are generally nontransferable, including, without limitation, transfers to third party financial institutions, other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and that restricted stock is generally nontransferable.
Termination and Amendment
The Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee may amend or terminate the 2019 Incentive Plan at any time, except that no amendment may, without stockholder approval, violate the stockholder approval requirements of the national securities exchange on which the Common Stock is principally listed. Unless sooner terminated, the 2019 Incentive Plan will terminate on the date before the tenth anniversary of the date the 2019 Incentive Plan is approved by the Company’s stockholders.
Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following is a brief discussiontable sets forth summary information regarding the outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of the U.S. federal income tax consequences for awards granted under the 2019 Incentive Plan. The 2019 Incentive Plan is not subject to the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and it is not, nor is it intended to be, qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. This discussion is not intended to be exhaustive and, among other things, does not describe state local or foreign taxes consequences, which may be substantially different. Holders of awards under the 2019 Incentive Plan should consult with their own tax advisors.December 26, 2020.
Non-Qualified Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. Except as noted below for corporate “insiders,” with respect to nonqualified stock options and stock appreciation rights, (i) no income is realized by a participant at the time the award is granted; (ii) generally, at exercise, ordinary income is realized by the participant in an amount equal to the difference between the exercise or base price paid for the shares and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise, and the participant’s employer is generally entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount subject to applicable tax withholding requirements; and (iii) upon a subsequent sale of the stock received on exercise, appreciation (or depreciation) after the date of exercise is treated as either short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss) depending on how long the shares have been held, and no deduction will be allowed to such participant’s employer.
Option Awards(1) | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(2)(3) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) | |||||||||
Gregory L. | 07/28/2016 | — | — | — | — | 24,000 | 837,840 | 10,000 | 349,100 | |||||||||
Christopher(4) | 07/27/2017 | — | — | — | — | 42,000 | 1,466,220 | 8,000 | 279,280 | |||||||||
07/26/2018 | — | — | — | — | 70,000 | 2,443,700 | 50,000 | 1,745,500 | ||||||||||
07/25/2019 | — | — | — | — | 70,000 | 2,443,700 | 66,000 | 2,304,060 | ||||||||||
08/07/2020 | — | — | — | — | 45,000 | 1,570,950 | 30,000 | 1,047,300 | ||||||||||
Jeffrey A. | 07/24/2015(5) | — | — | — | — | 7,000 | 244,370 | — | — | |||||||||
Martin | 07/28/2016(6) | — | — | — | — | 4,000 | 139,640 | 8,000 | 279,280 | |||||||||
07/27/2017(7) | — | — | — | — | 7,000 | 244,370 | 7,000 | 244,370 | ||||||||||
07/26/2018(8) | — | — | — | — | 12,000 | 418,920 | 6,000 | 209,460 | ||||||||||
08/08/2019(10) | — | — | — | — | 12,000 | 418,920 | 6,000 | 209,460 | ||||||||||
08/07/2020(12) | — | — | — | — | 15,000 | 523,650 | 8,000 | 279,280 | ||||||||||
Steffen | 07/24/2015(5) | — | — | — | — | 9,000 | 314,190 | — | — | |||||||||
Sigloch | 07/28/2016(6) | — | — | — | — | 6,000 | 209,460 | 12,000 | 418,920 | |||||||||
07/27/2017(7) | — | — | — | — | 10,500 | 366,555 | 10,000 | 349,100 | ||||||||||
07/26/2018(8) | — | — | — | — | 15,000 | 523,650 | 10,000 | 349,100 | ||||||||||
08/08/2019(10) | — | — | — | — | 13,000 | 453,830 | 10,000 | 349,100 | ||||||||||
08/07/2020(13) | — | — | — | — | 12,000 | 418,920 | 10,000 | 349,100 | ||||||||||
Christopher | 09/14/2015 | 14,666 | — | 24.58 | 09/14/2025 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
J. Miritello | 07/28/2016(6) | — | — | — | — | 800 | 27,928 | 2,000 | 69,820 | |||||||||
07/27/2017(7) | — | — | — | — | 1,400 | 48,874 | 2,000 | 69,820 | ||||||||||
07/26/2018(9) | — | — | — | — | 4,500 | 157,095 | — | — | ||||||||||
08/08/2019(11) | — | — | — | — | 2,500 | 87,275 | 2,500 | 87,275 | ||||||||||
08/07/2020(13) | — | — | — | — | 4,000 | 139,640 | 2,000 | 69,820 | ||||||||||
Gary | 07/25/2014 | 6,111 | — | 23.56 | 07/25/2024 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Westermeyer | 07/24/2015 | 6,111 | — | 26.52 | 07/24/2025 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
11/22/2016(6) | — | — | — | — | 2,800 | 97,748 | — | — | ||||||||||
07/27/2017(7) | — | — | — | — | 2,100 | 73,311 | 3,000 | 104,730 | ||||||||||
07/26/2018(8) | — | — | — | — | 4,000 | 139,640 | 3,000 | 104,730 | ||||||||||
08/08/2019(11) | — | — | — | — | 5,000 | 174,550 | 5,000 | 174,550 | ||||||||||
08/07/2020(13) | 5,000 | 174,550 | 10,000 | 349,100 |
Incentive Stock Options. No income is realized by a participant upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option, however, such participant will generally be required to include the excess of the fair market value of the shares at exercise over the exercise price in his or her alternative minimum taxable income. If shares are issued to a participant pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option, and if no disqualifying disposition of such shares is made by such participant within two years after the date of grant or within one year after the transfer of such shares to such participant, then (i) upon sale of such shares, any amount realized in excess of the exercise price will be taxed to such participant as a long-term capital gain, and any loss sustained will be a long-term capital loss, and (ii) no deduction will be allowed to the participant’s employer for federal income tax purposes.
(1) | The options granted to Mr. Miritello in 2015, and those granted to Mr. Westermeyer in 2014 and 2015 are fully vested. All outstanding vested options are exercisable until they expire on the tenth anniversary of the grant date, subject to earlier cancellation. All outstanding options were adjusted in March 2017 due to payment of the Special Dividend. The amount of outstanding options and the exercise prices shown in the above table are post-adjustment. |
Except as noted below for corporate “insiders,” if shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option are disposed of prior to the expiration of either holding period described above, generally (i) the participant will realize ordinaryMUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 39
(2) | The vesting of shares of performance-based restricted stock granted to all NEOs during 2016 through 2019 is conditioned upon the Company’s achievement of a 3.5% compounded annual growth rate in total stockholder return or diluted earnings per share over a defined reference period, and subject to earlier vesting in connection with a change in control or a termination of employment due to death, disability or a qualifying retirement (subject, in the case of a qualifying retirement, to achievement of the performance criteria, measured through the last day of the fiscal year preceding the year in which such qualifying retirement occurs). For the performance-based restricted stock granted to these executives on July 28, 2016, the vesting date is February 28, 2022, and the reference period is December 26, 2015 to the last day of the 2021 fiscal year. For the performance-based restricted sock granted to these executives on July 27, 2017, the vesting date is February 28, 2023, and the reference period is December 31, 2016 to the last day of the 2022 fiscal year. For the performance-based restricted stock granted to these executives on July 26, 2018, the vesting date is February 28, 2023, and the reference period is December 30, 2017 to the last day of the 2022 fiscal year. For the performance-based restricted stock granted to these executives on August 8, 2019 (or in the case of Mr. Christopher, July 25, 2019), the vesting date is February 28, 2024, and the reference period is December 30, 2018 to the last day of the 2023 fiscal year. |
(3) | The vesting of shares of performance-based restricted stock granted to Messrs. Christopher, Martin, Sigloch and Miritello in 2020 is conditioned upon the Company’s actual performance as compared with certain adjusted EBITDA and average ROIC targets, each weighted on a 50%-50% basis, over a three-year reference period (December 29, 2019 to December 31, 2022). Subject to this performance condition, these shares will vest on July 20, 2023. The vesting of shares of performance-based restricted stock granted to Mr. Westermeyer in 2020 is conditioned upon the operating income performance of various businesses overseen by Mr. Westermeyer as compared to an operating income target during the fiscal year ending December 28, 2024. Subject to this performance condition, these shares will vest on February 28, 2025. For more information on the performance-based criteria, please see the section entitled “Performance Criteria for Performance-Based Restricted Stock.” |
(4) | Shares of time-based restricted stock granted to Mr. Christopher will vest 30% on each of the third and fourth anniversaries of the vesting commencement date (July 30 of the year of grant), and 40% on the fifth anniversary of the vesting commencement date, in each case, subject to earlier vesting in connection with a change in control or a termination of employment due to death, disability, by us without cause or by Mr. Christopher for good reason. |
(5) | Shares of time-based restricted stock will vest 30% on each of July 30, 2018, and July 30, 2019, and 40% on July 30, 2020, subject to earlier vesting in connection with a change in control or a termination of employment due to death or disability. |
(6) | Shares of time-based restricted stock will vest 30% on each of July 30, 2019, and July 30, 2020, and 40% on July 30, 2023, subject to earlier vesting in connection with a change in control or a termination of employment due to death or disability. |
(7) | Shares of time-based restricted stock will vest 30% on each of July 30, 2020, and July 30, 2021, and 40% on July 30, 2022, subject to earlier vesting in connection with a change in control or a termination of employment due to death or disability. |
(8) | Shares of time-based restricted stock will vest 30% on each of July 30, 2021, and July 30, 2022, and 40% on July 30, 2023, subject to earlier vesting in connection with a change in control or a termination of employment due to death or disability. |
(9) | Shares of time-based restricted stock will vest 100% on July 30, 2023, subject to earlier vesting in connection with a change in control or a termination of employment due to death or disability. |
(10) | Shares of time-based restricted stock will vest 30% on each of July 30, 2022, and July 30, 2023, and 40% on July 30, 2024, subject to earlier vesting in connection with a change in control or a termination of employment due to death or disability. |
(11) | Shares of time-based restricted stock will vest 100% on July 30, 2024, subject to earlier vesting in connection with a change in control or a termination of employment due to death or disability. |
(12) | Shares of time-based restricted stock will vest 30% on each of July 30, 2023, and July 30, 2024, and 40% on July 30, 2025, subject to earlier vesting in connection with a change in control or a termination of employment due to death or disability. |
(13) | Shares of time-based restricted stock will vest 100% on July 30, 2025, subject to earlier vesting in connection with a termination of employment due to death or disability. Shares of time-based restricted stock granted to Messrs. Sigloch and Miritello are also subject to earlier vesting in connection with a change in control. |
— | 2020 STOCK VESTED AND OPTIONS EXERCISED |
income inThe following table sets forth the year of disposition in an amount equal to the excess (if any) of the fair market value of such shares at exercise (or, if less, the amount realized on the disposition of such shares) over the exercise price paid for such shares and (ii) the participant’s employer will generally be entitled to deduct such amount for federal income tax purposes. Any further gain (or loss) realized by the participant will be taxed as short-term or long-term capital gain (or loss), as the case may be, and will not result in any deduction by the employer.
Subject to certain exceptions for disability or death, if an incentive stock option is exercised more than three months following terminationeach of employment, the exercise of the option will generally be taxed as the exercise of a nonqualified stock option.
Other Stock-Based Awards. The tax effects related to other stock-based awards under the 2019 Incentive Plan are dependent upon the structure of the particular award.
Withholding. At the time a participant is required to recognize ordinary compensation income resulting from an award, as described above, such income will be subject to federal and applicable state and local income tax and applicable tax withholding requirements. The Company will deduct or withhold, or require the participant to remit to his or her employer, an amount sufficient to satisfy the minimum federal, state and local and foreign taxes required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable eventour named executive officers as a result of the 2019 Incentive Plan.vesting of restricted stock and exercise of stock options during the fiscal year ended December 26, 2020.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) | ||||
Gregory L. Christopher | — | — | 61,600 | 1,739,584 | ||||
Jeffrey A. Martin | 5,533 | 149,116 | 16,600 | 520,444 | ||||
Steffen Sigloch | — | — | 24,400 | 755,476 | ||||
Christopher J. Miritello | — | — | 5,200 | 149,688 | ||||
Gary Westermeyer | — | — | 1,500 | 42,360 |
Section 409A. Certain awards under the 2019 Incentive Plan may be subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, which regulates “nonqualified deferred compensation” (as defined in Section 409A). If an award under the 2019 Incentive Plan (or any other Company plan) that is subject to Section 409A is not administered in compliance with Section 409A, then all compensation under the 2019 Incentive Plan that is considered “nonqualified deferred compensation” (and awards under any other Company plan that are required pursuant to Section 409A to be aggregated with the award under the 2019 Incentive Plan) will be taxable to the participant as ordinary income in the year of the violation, or if later, the year in which the compensation subject to the award is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. In addition, the participant will be subject to an additional tax equal to 20% of the compensation that is required to be included in income as a result of the violation, plus interest from the date that the compensation subject to the award was required to be included in taxable income.
The amounts shown in the Value Realized on Exercise Column equals the number of options exercised multiplied by the market value of the Company’s stock on the exercise date less the option exercise price. |
Certain Rules Applicable to “Insiders.”As a result of the rules under Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, depending upon the particular exemption from the provisions of Section 16(b) utilized, “insiders” (as defined in Section 16(b)) may not receive the same tax treatment as set forth above with respect to the grant and/or exercise or settlement of awards. Generally, insiders will not be subject to taxation until the expiration of any period during which they are subject to the liability provisions of Section 16(b) with respect to any particular award. Insiders should check with their own tax advisers to ascertain the appropriate tax treatment for any particular award.
New Plan Benefits
Because awards to be granted in the future under the 2019 Incentive Plan are at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, it is not possible to determine the benefits or the amounts received or that will be received under the 2019 Incentive Plan by eligible participants.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table discloses information regarding the securities to be issued and the securities remaining available for issuance under the Company’s stock-based incentive plans as of December 29, 2018 (shares in thousands). The amounts shown do not include the shares of Common Stock that would be available for issuance under the 2019 Incentive Plan if this proposal is approved.
(a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||||||
Plan category | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and rights | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans – approved by security holders | 1,014 | $ | 23.90 | 344 | (1) | |||||||
Equity compensation plans – not approved by security holders | — | — | — | |||||||||
Total | 1,014 | $ | 23.90 | 344 | (1) |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 40
— | POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR CHANGE IN CONTROL AS OF THE ENDOF 2020 |
Pursuant to the employment agreement with our Chief Executive Officer, and the equity award and change in control agreements with our other named executive officers (other than Mr. Westermeyer), upon a change in control or certain terminations of employment, our named executive officers are entitled to payments of compensation and benefits and/or accelerated vesting of equity awards, in each case as described below. The table below reflects the amount of compensation and benefits payable to each named executive officer in the event of (i) a change in control, (ii) an involuntary termination without cause or a resignation for good reason (specifically, for Messrs. Martin, Sigloch and Miritello, the occurrence of such a termination upon or within two years following a change in control), and (iii) a termination by reason of death or disability. The named executive officers are not entitled to any payments in connection with a termination for cause.
The amounts shown assume the applicable triggering event occurred on December 26, 2020, and are estimates of the amounts that would be paid to the named executive officers upon the occurrence of such triggering event.
Name | Triggering Event | Salary & Bonus ($) | Benefits ($) | Accelerated Vesting of Equity Awards ($) | Total ($) | ||||||||
Gregory L. | Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason | 11,562,500 | (1) | 296,257 | (3) | 9,417,627 | (4) | 21,276,384 | |||||
Christopher | Termination Due to Death or Disability | 3,125,000 | (2) | 296,257 | (3) | 15,142,867 | (4) | 18,564,124 | |||||
Change in Control | — | — | 15,142,867 | (4) | 15,142,867 | ||||||||
Termination Without Good Reason | — | 296,257 | (3) | — | 296,257 | ||||||||
Jeffrey A. Martin | Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason | 1,915,411 | (5) | 36,544 | (5) | 3,477,712 | (4) | 5,429,667 | |||||
following a Change in Control | |||||||||||||
Termination Due to Death or Disability | — | — | 3,477,712 | (4) | 3,477,712 | ||||||||
Change in Control | — | — | 3,477,712 | (4) | 3,477,712 | ||||||||
Steffen Sigloch | Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason following a Change in Control | 1,548,505 | (5) | 36,544 | (5) | 4,475,550 | (4) | 6,060,599 | |||||
Termination Due to Death or Disability | — | — | 4,475,550 | (4) | 4,475,550 | ||||||||
Change in Control | — | — | 4,475,550 | (4) | 4,475,550 | ||||||||
Christopher J. | Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason | 1,310,657 | (5) | 15,945 | (5) | 801,364 | (4) | 2,127,966 | |||||
Miritello | following a Change in Control | ||||||||||||
Termination Due to Death or Disability | 801,364 | (4) | 801,364 | ||||||||||
Change in Control | 801,364 | (4) | 801,364 | ||||||||||
Gary Westermeyer(6) | Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason following a Change in Control | — | — | 1,537,429 | (4) | 1,537,429 | |||||||
Termination Due to Death or Disability | — | — | 1,537,429 | (4) | 1,537,429 | ||||||||
Change in Control | — | — | 1,537,429 | (4) | 1,537,429 |
(1) | Includes the value of continuation of base salary and |
(2) | Includes the value of a pro-rata bonus for the year of termination. The pro-rata bonus amount listed represents Mr. Christopher’s 2020 bonus paid pursuant to our 2020 annual incentive program. |
(3) | Includes the value of continued participation in the Company’s |
(4) | Includes the value of accelerated vesting of unvested shares of restricted stock as of December 26, 2020, based on a per share value of $34.91. Unvested shares of restricted stock granted to NEOs will vest automatically in connection with a termination due to death or disability or a change in control. Mr. Christopher is also entitled to accelerated vesting of certain of his awards upon an involuntary termination without cause or a resignation for good reason. Payments to which named executive officers are |
(5) | Includes the value of: (i) two times the executive’s base salary as |
(6) | Mr. Westermeyer is not party to a change in control agreement or an employment agreement. |
Proposed ActionMUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 41
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS |
As of March 19, 2021, the following parties were known by the Company to be the “beneficial owner” of more than five percent of the Common Stock:
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner | Shares Beneficially Owned | Percent of Class | ||||
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 | 8,682,635 | (1) | 15.2% | (2) | ||
GAMCO Investors, Inc. One Corporate Center Rye, NY 10580 | 5,777,728 | (3) | 10.1% | (2) | ||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, PA 19355 | 5,747,985 | (4) | 10.0% | (2) | ||
Wells Fargo & Company 420 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94163 | 4,099,287 | (5) | 7.2% | (2) |
(1) | This information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by BlackRock, Inc. with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on January 26, 2021. BlackRock filed this Schedule 13G/A on its own behalf and on behalf of certain of its subsidiaries. The Schedule 13G/A reported that BlackRock has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 8,580,344 and 8,682,635, respectively, of the shares shown. The Schedule 13G/A also reported that BlackRock Fund Advisors owned 5% or greater of the security class being reported on the Schedule 13G/A. |
(2) | The percent of class shown was based on the shares of Common Stock reported on the Schedule 13G/A and the total number of shares outstanding as of December 26, 2020. The difference in the total number of shares outstanding on December 26, 2020 and March 19, 2021 does not materially affect the percentage of ownership of the class. |
(3) | This information is based on a Schedule 13D/A filed by GAMCO Investors Inc. (“GBL”) and certain of its affiliates (collectively, the “Gabelli Reporters”) on August 25, 2020. The Schedule 13D/A reported that GAMCO Asset Management, Inc. (“GAMCO”) beneficially owns 3,440,528 of the shares reported; Gabelli Funds, LLC (“Gabelli Funds”) beneficially owns 2,203,500 of the shares reported; Gabelli & Company Investment Advisers, Inc. beneficially owns 3,000 of the shares reported; GGCP, Inc. beneficially owns 22,000 of shares reported; Mario J. Gabelli (“Gabelli”) beneficially owns 500 of the shares reported; Gabelli Foundation, Inc. beneficially owns 7,000 of the shares reported; MJG Associates, Inc. beneficially owns 97,200 of the shares reported; and Associated Capital Group, Inc. beneficially owns 4,000 of the shares reported. In addition, the Schedule 13D/A reported that each Gabelli Reporter (and certain executives, directors and other related persons as disclosed on the Schedule 13D/A) has the sole power to vote or direct the vote and sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition of the Common Stock reported for it, either for its own benefit or for the benefit of its investment clients or its partners, as the case may be, except that (i) GAMCO does not have authority to vote 256,800 of the reported shares, (ii) Gabelli Funds, a wholly-owned subsidiary of GBL, has sole dispositive and voting power with respect to the shares of the Company held by certain funds (the “Funds”) for which it provides advisory services, so long as the aggregate voting interest of all joint filers does not exceed 25% of their total voting interest in the Company and, in that event, the Proxy Voting Committee of each Fund shall respectively vote that Fund’s shares, (iii) at any time, the Proxy Voting Committee of each such Fund may take and exercise in its sole discretion the entire voting power with respect to the shares held by such fund under special circumstances such as regulatory considerations, and (iv) the power of Gabelli, Associated, GBL, and GGCP is indirect with respect to Common Stock beneficially owned directly by other Gabelli Reporters. |
(4) | This information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“VGI”) with the SEC on March 10, 2021. According to the Schedule 13G/A, VGI has sole dispositive power with respect to 5,645,950 of the shares shown. VGI also has shared voting power with respect to 56,923 of the shares shown, and shared dispositive power with respect to 102,035 of the shares shown. |
(5) | This information is based on a Schedule 13G filing by Wells Fargo & Company on February 12, 2021. Wells Fargo filed this Schedule 13G on its own behalf and on behalf of certain of its subsidiaries. The Schedule 13G reported that Wells Fargo has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 137,841 of the shares shown. The Schedule 13G also reported that Wells Fargo has shared voting and shared dispositive power with respect to 722,965 and 3,961,446, respectively, of the shares shown. Further, the Schedule 13G reported that Wells Capital Management Incorporated owned 5% or greater of the security class being reported on the Schedule 13G. |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 42
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK BY INSIDERS |
The following table sets forth, as of the close of business on March 19, 2021, information about the 1,674,471 shares of Common Stock (calculated based on 57,120,304 shares outstanding) beneficially owned by each of the Company’s current directors, nominees for director, executive officers and named executive officers. The “named executive officers” are those individuals set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table for 2020” included herein. Unless otherwise indicated, all directors, nominees for director, executive officers and named executive officers have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of Common Stock reported. The table and the accompanying footnotes set forth the foregoing persons’ current positions with the Company, principal occupations and employment over the preceding five years, age and directorships held in certain other publicly-owned companies.
Principal Occupation, Employment, etc. | Common Stock Beneficially Owned as of March 19, 2021 | Percent of Class | ||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Gregory L. Christopher(1) | 689,965 | 1.2% | ||
Independent Directors | ||||
Elizabeth Donovan(2) | 14,000 | * | ||
Gennaro J. Fulvio(3) | 64,754 | * | ||
Gary S. Gladstein(4) | 160,296 | * | ||
Scott J. Goldman(5) | 55,544 | * | ||
John B. Hansen(6) | 84,885 | * | ||
Terry Hermanson(7) | 49,126 | * | ||
Charles P. Herzog, Jr.(8) | 31,048 | * | ||
Section 16 Officers | ||||
Devin Malone | 37,083 | * | ||
President - Streamline since January 1, 2019; age 39(9) | ||||
Jeffrey A. Martin | 166,246 | * | ||
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since February 14, 2013; age 54(10) | ||||
Mark Millerchip | — | — | ||
Executive Director – European Operations since May 28, 2010; age 54(11) | ||||
Christopher J. Miritello | 41,340 | * | ||
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since January 1, 2017; age 38(12) | ||||
Christopher A. Mitchell | 27,000 | * | ||
President – Brass & Aluminum since January 1, 2020; age 47(13) | ||||
Steffen Sigloch | 159,846 | * | ||
Chief Manufacturing Officer since May 4, 2017; age 52(14) | ||||
Anthony J. Steinriede | 27,725 | * | ||
Vice President – Corporate Controller since April 23, 2015; age 44(15) | ||||
Gary Westermeyer | 65,613 | * | ||
President – Refrigeration of the Company since May 4, 2017; age 56(16) | ||||
SECTION 16 OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS AS A GROUP | 1,674,471 | 2.9%** |
* | Less than 1% |
** | Includes 226,830 shares of Common Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options and 767,400 shares of non-vested restricted stock held by executive officers and directors of the Company. |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 43
(1) | The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Christopher includes (i) 415,000 shares of non-vested restricted stock, (ii) 123,500 shares owned by a trust in which his wife is beneficiary, (iii) 83,500 shares owned by a trust in which he is beneficiary and (iv) 6,800 shares of Common Stock which are owned by Mr. Christopher’s children. |
(2) | The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Ms. Donovan includes (i) 10,000 shares of Common Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options, (ii) 2,000 shares of Common stock which are owned by Ms. Donovan’s spouse and (iii) 2,000 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
(3) | The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Fulvio includes (i) 35,555 shares of Common Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options, (ii) 27,199 shares of Common Stock which are owned by Mr. Fulvio’s spouse and (iii) 2,000 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
On June 27, 2017, pursuant to an Offer of Settlement, and without admitting or denying the findings contained therein, the PCAOB issued an Order Instituting Disciplinary Proceedings, Making Findings and Imposing Sanctions against Fulvio & Associates LLP (the “Firm”), Mr. Fulvio and certain other named affiliates of the Firm (collectively, “Respondents”) for Respondents’ having allegedly “violated PCAOB rules and standards in connection with their audit and examination engagement for a broker-dealer client, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014.” See PCAOB Release No. 105-2017-029 dated June 27, 2017. The Firm is currently registered with the PCAOB, and Mr. Fulvio may participate in audits pursuant to PCAOB standards. | |
(4) | The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Gladstein includes (i) 45,333 shares of Common Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options and (ii) 2,000 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
(5) | The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Goldman includes (i) 40,444 shares of Common Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options and (ii) 2,000 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
(6) | The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Hansen includes (i) 25,778 shares of Common Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options, (ii) 13,000 shares of Common Stock owned by a trust where his wife and children serve as beneficiaries and (iii) 2,000 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
(7) | The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Hermanson includes (i) 16,000 shares of Common Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options and (ii) 2,000 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
(8) | The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Herzog includes (i) 14,000 shares of Common Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options, (ii) 9,000 shares of Common Stock owned by a trust of which Mr. Herzog’s children are beneficiaries; and (iii) 2,000 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
(9) | Mr. Malone served (i) as Director of Marketing – Copper Tube and Line Sets from January 1, 2013 until February 3, 2015, (ii) as General Manager of Howell Metal Company from February 3, 2015 until July 4, 2017, and (iii) as Vice President-General Manager of Streamline from July 4, 2017 until January 1, 2019. The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Malone includes (i) 5,499 shares of Common Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options, and (ii) 29,300 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
(10) | Mr. Martin served (i) as Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company from October 26, 2012 until February 14, 2013, (ii) as Vice President - Corporate Development of the Company from January 11, 2011 until October 26, 2012, (iii) as Vice President-Finance & Corporate Development from August 1, 2008 until January 11, 2011, and (iv) as Vice President-Operations, Standard Products Division prior to August 1, 2008. The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Martin includes (i) 74,246 shares of Common Stock owned jointly between Mr. Martin and his wife and (ii) 92,000 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
(11) | Mr. Millerchip served as Managing Director – Mueller Primaflow Limited prior to May 28, 2010. |
(12) | Mr. Miritello served as Deputy General Counsel of the Company from September 15, 2015 to December 31, 2016. Prior to joining the Company, he was associated with the New York office of Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP. The number of shares of Common Stock owned by Mr. Miritello includes (i) 14,666 shares of Common Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options and (ii) 21,700 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
(13) | Mr. Mitchell served (i) as Vice President-General Manager of Great Lakes Copper, Inc. (n/k/a Great Lakes Copper Ltd.) from July 1, 2013 until January 1, 2019 and (ii) as President – Canadian Operations from January 1, 2019 until October 22, 2019. The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Mitchell includes 27,000 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
(14) | Mr. Sigloch served as (i) President – Piping Systems North America of the Company from May 5, 2016 until May 4, 2017; (ii) President – Extruded Products of the Company from January 1, 2013 until May 5, 2016, (iii) Corporate Vice President – Engineering and Manufacturing of the Company from January 1, 2012 until January 1, 2013, and (iv) Vice President – Engineering and Manufacturing of Mueller Europe, Ltd, from July 1, 2011 until January 1, 2012. Prior to joining the Company on July 1, 2011, Mr. Sigloch served as Chief Executive Officer of Wieland Copper Products, LLC. The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Sigloch includes 117,500 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
(15) | Mr. Steinriede served as (i) Director of Finance at the Company from April 1, 2014 until April 23, 2015, (ii) Assistant Corporate Controller from September 1, 2010 until April 1, 2014, and (iii) Corporate Accounting Manager prior to September 1, 2010. The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Steinriede includes (i) 9,777 shares of Common Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options and (ii) 11,000 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
(16) | Mr. Westermeyer previously served as General Manager of Westermeyer Industries, Inc., a company he established in 2001, and which was acquired by the Company on August 16, 2012. In 2017, he also assumed duties as General Manager of Turbotec Products, Inc., another wholly-owned subsidiary acquired by the Company in 2015. The number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Westermeyer includes (i) 9,778 shares of Common Stock which are subject to currently exercisable stock options, (ii) 5,785 shares of Common Stock which are beneficially owned by Mr. Westermeyer’s spouse, and (iii) 39,900 shares of non-vested restricted stock. |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 44
— | DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS |
Based solely upon its review of Forms 3 and 4 received by it, and written representations from certain reporting persons about whether any Form 5 filings were required, the Company believes that during 2020, all filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and ten percent stockholders were complied with, except as follows:
MUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 45
INFORMATION ABOUT VOTING AND THE ANNUAL MEETING |
We are providing you with these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Mueller Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) of proxies for our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), which will be held at 10:00 A.M., Central time on Thursday, May 6, 2021, at our corporate headquarters located at 150 Schilling Boulevard, Collierville, Tennessee 38017, in the second floor conference room.
ApprovalWe intend to hold our Annual Meeting in person. However, we are actively monitoring the coronavirus (COVID-19); we are sensitive to the public health and travel concerns our shareholders may have and the protocols that federal, state, and local governments may impose. In the event it is not possible or advisable to hold our Annual Meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements for the meeting as promptly as practicable, which may include holding the meeting solely by means of remote communication. Please monitor our Annual Meeting website at www.muellerindustries.com for updated information. If you are planning to attend our meeting, please check the website one week prior to the meeting date. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting.
This Proxy Statement, together with the Company’s Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2020, is first being mailed to stockholders on or about April 1, 2021. Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company is providing access to its proxy materials over the Internet at http://www.proxyvote.com.
Record Date: March 19, 2021
When a proxy card is returned properly signed, the shares represented thereby will be voted in accordance with the stockholder’s directions appearing on the card. If the proxy card is signed and returned without directions, the shares will be voted for the nominees named herein and in accordance with the recommendations of the 2019 Incentive Plan proposal requiresCompany’s Board of Directors as set forth herein. A stockholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is voted at the affirmative voteAnnual Meeting by giving written notice to the secretary of the Annual Meeting or by casting a ballot at the Annual Meeting. Votes cast by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting will be tabulated by election inspectors appointed for the Annual Meeting. The election inspectors will also determine whether a quorum is present. The holders of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting by the stockholders present in person or by proxyshares of common stock, $.01 par value per share (“Common Stock”), outstanding and entitled to vote thereon.who are present either in person or represented by proxy will constitute a quorum for the Annual Meeting.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THATSTOCKHOLDERS VOTE THEIR SHARESFORTHE PROPOSAL TOADOPT THE 2019 INCENTIVE PLAN.The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition to solicitation by mail, directors, officers and employees of the Company may solicit proxies by telephone or otherwise. The Company will reimburse brokers or other persons holding stock in their names or in the names of their nominees for their charges and expenses in forwarding proxies and proxy material to the beneficial owners of such stock.
— | VOTING SECURITIES |
At the close of business on the Record Date, there were 57,120,304 shares of Common Stock outstanding, which are the only shares entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. The Bylaws do not provide for cumulative voting for the election of directors.
On March 9, 2017, the Company paid a special dividend (the “Special Dividend”) consisting of $3.00 in cash and $5.00 in principal amount of the Company’s 6% Subordinated Debentures due 2027 (the “Debentures”, which have been called for full redemption on April 15, 2021) for each share of Common Stock outstanding as of the close of business on February 28, 2017. In connection with the Special Dividend, in accordance with the Company’s outstanding stock option plans and agreements, the Company adjusted the shares subject to and the per share exercise price with respect to outstanding options. This adjustment resulted in an increase in the number of shares subject to each outstanding option and an adjustment to the option purchase price designed to maintain the option holders’ intrinsic value following issuance of the Special Dividend. References in this Proxy Statement to beneficial stock ownership or outstanding options for periods following March 9, 2017 reflect the equitable adjustment made to options outstanding on February 28, 2017.
MUELLER INDUSTRIESSTOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS FOR BOARD MEMBERSHIP •
2021 PROXY STATEMENT AND OTHER PROPOSALS FOR 2020 ANNUAL MEETING46
— | STOCKHOLDER NOMINATIONS FOR BOARD MEMBERSHIP AND OTHER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING |
It is anticipated that the next Annual Meeting after the one scheduled for May 2, 20196, 2021 will be held on or about May 7, 2020.5, 2022. The Company’s Bylaws require that, for nominations of directors or other business to be properly brought before an Annual Meeting, written notice of such nomination or proposal for other business must be furnished to the Company. Such notice must contain certain information concerning the nominating or proposing stockholder and information concerning the nominee and must be furnished by the stockholder (who must be entitled to vote at the meeting) to the Secretary of the Company, in the case of the Annual Meeting to be held in 2020,2022, no earlier than December 4, 20196, 2021 and no later than January 3, 2020.5, 2022. A copy of the applicable provisions of the Bylaws may be obtained by any stockholder, without charge, upon written request to the Secretary of the Company at the address set forth below.
In addition to the foregoing, and in accordance with the rules of the SEC, in order for a stockholder proposal, relating to a proper subject, to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the Annual Meeting to
be held in 2019,2022, such proposal must be received by the Secretary of the Company by November 29, 2019December 2, 2021 in the form required under and subject to the other requirements of the applicable rules of the SEC. If the date of the Annual Meeting to be held in 20192022 is changed to a date more than 30 days earlier or later than May 7, 2020,5, 2022, the Company will inform the stockholders in a timely fashion of such change and the date by which proposals of stockholders must be received for inclusion in the proxy materials. Any such proposal should be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested, or other means, including electronic means, that allow the stockholder to prove the date of delivery.
MUELLER INDUSTRIESOTHER MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING • 2021 PROXY STATEMENT 47
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
If any matter not described herein should properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the proxy will vote the shares represented by them as they deem appropriate. At the date of this Proxy Statement, the Company knew of no other matters which might be presented for stockholder action at the Annual Meeting.
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP COMPLIANCE REPORTING
Based solely upon its review of Forms 3 and 4 received by it and written representations from certain reporting persons that no Forms 5 were required for those persons, the Company believes that during 2018, all filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and ten percent stockholders were complied with.
Consolidated financial statements for the Company are included in the Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 29, 201826, 2020 that accompanies this Proxy Statement. These financial statements are also on file with the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 and with the NYSE. The Company’s SEC filings are also available at the Company’s website at www.muellerindustries.comwww. muellerindustries.com or the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
A COPY OF THE COMPANY’S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AS FILED FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 29, 201826, 2020 (EXCLUDING EXHIBITS) OR, AS NOTED HEREIN, ANY OF THE COMPANY’S BOARD COMMITTEE CHARTERS, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES, OR CODE OF ETHICS WILL BE FURNISHED, WITHOUT CHARGE, BY WRITING TO CHRISTOPHER J. MIRITELLO, CORPORATE SECRETARY, MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC., AT THE COMPANY’S PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS (150 SCHILLING BOULEVARD, SUITE 100, COLLIERVILLE, TENNESSEE 38017). UPON RECEIPT BY WRITING TO THE FOREGOING ADDRESS, THE COMPANY WILL ALSO FURNISH ANY OTHER EXHIBIT OF THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K UPON ADVANCE PAYMENT OF THE REASONABLE OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES OF THE COMPANY RELATED TO THE COMPANY’S FURNISHING OF SUCH EXHIBIT.
NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
— | NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 6, 2021 |
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2019 Annual General Meeting to be held on May 2, 2019:
The Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available atHTTP:at: http://WWW.PROXYVOTE.COMwww.proxyvote.com
You will need the Control Number included on your proxy card. For the date, time, and location of the Annual General Meeting, please refer to “Solicitation of Proxies.” For information on how to attend and vote in person at the Annual General Meeting, an identification of the matters to be voted upon at the Annual General Meeting and the Board’s recommendations regarding those matters, please refer to “Solicitation of Proxies,” “Election of Directors,” “Appointment of Independent Registered Accounting Firm”, and “Approval of the Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers” and “Approval of the 2019 Incentive Plan.Officers.”
HOUSEHOLDING OF ANNUAL MEETING MATERIALS
The SEC has enacted a rule that allows multiple investors residing at the same address the convenience of receiving a single copy of annual reports, proxy statements, prospectuses and other disclosure documents if they consent to do so. This is known as “Householding.” Please note, if you do not respond, Householding will start 60 days after the mailing of this notice. We will allow Householding only upon certain conditions. Some of those conditions are:
• | You agree to or do not object to the Householding of your materials, | |
• | You have the same last name and exact address as another investor(s). |
If these conditions are met, and SEC regulations allow, your household will receive a single copy of annual reports, proxy statements, prospectuses and other disclosure documents.
You may revoke a prior Householding consent at any time by contacting Broadridge, either by calling toll-free at (800) 542-1061, or by writing to Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York, 11717. We will remove you from the Householding program within 30 days of receipt of your response, following which you will receive an individual copy of our disclosure document.
By order of the Board of Directors | |
MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC.2019 INCENTIVE PLAN
The purpose of the Plan is to assist the Company in attracting, retaining, motivating, and rewarding certain key employees, officers, directors, and consultants of the Company and its Affiliates and promoting the creation of long-term value for stockholders of the Company by closely aligning the interests of such individuals with those of such stockholders. The Plan authorizes the award Stock-based incentives to Eligible Persons to encourage such persons to expend maximum effort in the creation of stockholder value.
If the Plan is not approved by the Company’s stockholders, then the Plan will be null and void in its entirety.Christopher J. Miritello
For purposes of the Plan, the following terms shall be defined as set forth below:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, (x) a Change in Control shall not be deemed to occur solely because any person acquires beneficial ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the Company Voting Securities as a result of an acquisition of Company Voting Securities by the Company that reduces the number of Company Voting Securities outstanding;providedthat if after such acquisition by the Company such person becomes the beneficial owner of additional Company Voting Securities that increases the percentage of outstanding Company Voting Securities beneficially
owned by such person, a Change in Control shall then occur, and (y) with respect to the payment of any amount that constitutes a deferral of compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code payable upon a Change in Control, a Change in Control shall not be deemed to have occurred, unless the Change in Control constitutes a change in the ownership or effective control of the Company or in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company under Section 409A(a)(2)(A)(v) of the Code.
The Committee is authorized, subject to limitations under applicable law, to grant to Participants such other Awards that may be denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based upon or related to Stock, as deemed by the Committee to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan. The Committee may also grant Stock as a bonus (whether or not subject to any vesting requirements or other restrictions on transfer), and may grant other awards in lieu of obligations of the Company or an Affiliate to pay cash or deliver other property under this Plan or under other plans or compensatory arrangements, subject to such terms as shall be determined by the Committee. The terms and conditions applicable to such Awards shall be determined by the Committee and evidenced by Award Agreements, which agreements need not be identical.
Payments to holders pursuant to paragraph (3) above shall be made in cash or, in the sole discretion of the Committee, and to the extent applicable, in the form of such other consideration necessary for a Participant to receive property, cash, or securities (or a combination thereof) as such Participant would have been
entitled to receive upon the occurrence of the transaction if the Participant had been, immediately prior to such transaction, the holder of the number of shares of Stock covered by the Award at such time (less any applicable exercise or base price). In addition, in connection with any Corporate Event, prior to any payment or adjustment contemplated under this subsection (b), the Committee may require a Participant to (A) represent and warrant as to the unencumbered title to his or her Awards, (B) bear such Participant’s pro-rata share of any post-closing indemnity obligations, and be subject to the same post-closing purchase price adjustments, escrow terms, offset rights, holdback terms, and similar conditions as the other holders of Stock, and (C) deliver customary transfer documentation as reasonably determined by the Committee.
The proceeds received from the sale of Stock pursuant to the Plan shall be used for general corporate purposes.
Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Plan, no person shall be entitled to the rights and privileges of Stock ownership in respect of shares of Stock that are subject to Awards hereunder until such shares have been issued to that person.
Awards may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated, including, without limitation, to third party financial institutions, other than by will or by the applicable laws of descent and distribution, and to the extent subject to exercise, Awards may not be exercised during the lifetime of the grantee other than by the grantee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, except with respect to Incentive Stock Options, Awards and a Participant’s rights under the Plan shall be transferable for no value and only to the extent provided in an Award Agreement or otherwise determined at any time by the Committee.
No individual shall have any claim or right to be granted an Award under the Plan or, having been selected for the grant of an Award, to be selected for the grant of any other Award. Neither the Plan nor any action taken hereunder shall be construed as giving any individual any right to be retained in the employ or service of the Company or an Affiliate of the Company.
The obligation of the Company to deliver Stock upon issuance, vesting, exercise, or settlement of any Award shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, and to such approvals by governmental agencies as may be required. Notwithstanding any terms or conditions of any Award to the contrary, the Company shall be under no obligation to offer to sell or to sell, and shall be prohibited from offering to sell or selling, any shares of Stock pursuant to an Award unless such shares have been properly registered for sale with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act or unless the Company has received an opinion of counsel, satisfactory to the Company, that such shares may be offered or sold without such registration pursuant to an available exemption therefrom and the terms and conditions of such exemption have been fully complied with. The Company shall be under no obligation to register for sale or resale under the Securities Act any of the shares of Stock to be offered or sold under the Plan or any shares of Stock to be issued upon exercise or settlement of Awards. If the shares of Stock offered for sale or sold under the Plan are offered or sold pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act, the Company may restrict the transfer of such shares and may legend the Stock certificates representing such shares in such manner as it deems advisable to ensure the availability of any such exemption.
As a condition to the issuance, vesting, exercise, or settlement of any Award (or upon the making of an election under Section 83(b) of the Code), the Committee may require that a Participant satisfy, through deduction or withholding from any payment of any kind otherwise due to the Participant, or through such other arrangements as are satisfactory to the Committee, the minimum amount of all federal, state, and local income and other taxes of any kind required or permitted to be withheld in connection with such vesting, exercise, or settlement (or election).
The Committee, in its discretion, may permit shares of Stock to be used to satisfy tax withholding requirements, and such shares shall be valued at their Fair Market Value as of the issuance, vesting, exercise, or settlement date of the Award, as applicable. Depending on the withholding method, the Company may withhold by considering the applicable minimum statutorily required withholding rates or other applicable withholding rates in the applicable Participant’s jurisdiction, including maximum applicable rates that may be utilized without creating adverse accounting treatment under Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 (or any successor pronouncement thereto).
The Board or the Committee may suspend or terminate the Plan at any time. Unless sooner terminated, the Plan shall terminate on the day before the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Effective Date. No Awards may be granted under the Plan while the Plan is suspended or after it is terminated;provided,however, that following any suspension or termination of the Plan, the Plan shall remain in effect for the purpose of governing all Awards then outstanding hereunder until such time as all Awards under the Plan have been terminated, forfeited, or otherwise canceled, or earned, exercised, settled, or otherwise paid out, in accordance with their terms.
The Plan is effective as of the Effective Date, subject to stockholder approval.
MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC.ATTN: CHRIS J. MIRITELLO150 SCHILLING BLVD., SUITE 100COLLIERVILLE, TN 38017
VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.Secretary
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTUREMUELLER INDUSTRIES • 2021 PROXY MATERIALSSTATEMENT 48
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
E70729-P17597 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC. | For All | Withhold All | For All Except | To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. | ||||||||||||||
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: | ||||||||||||||||||
1. | Election of Directors | o | o | o | ||||||||||||||
Nominees: | ||||||||||||||||||
01) | Gregory L. Christopher | 06) | Scott J. Goldman | |||||||||||||||
02) | Elizabeth Donovan | 07) | John B. Hansen | |||||||||||||||
03) | Paul J. Flaherty | 08) | Terry Hermanson | |||||||||||||||
04) | Gennaro J. Fulvio | 09) | Charles P. Herzog, Jr. | |||||||||||||||
05) | Gary S. Gladstein | |||||||||||||||||
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2, 3 and 4. | For | Against | Abstain | |||||||||||||||
2. | Approve the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. | o | o | o | ||||||||||||||
3. | To approve, on an advisory basis by non-binding vote, executive compensation. | o | o | o | ||||||||||||||
4. | To approve adoption of the Company’s 2019 Incentive Plan. | o | o | o | ||||||||||||||
NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. | ||||||||||||||||||
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE SIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” ALL NOMINEES LISTED, “FOR” PROPOSAL 2, “FOR” PROPOSAL 3 AND “FOR” PROPOSAL 4. | ||||||||||||||||||
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. | ||||||||||||||||||
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.
E70730-P17597
MUELLER INDUSTRIES, INC.
PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS - MAY 2, 2019This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors.
The undersigned hereby appoints Christopher J. Miritello and Jeffrey A. Martin, and each of them, Proxies, with full power of substitution in each, to represent and to vote, as designated, all shares of Common Stock of Mueller Industries, Inc. that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 2, 2019, and at all adjournments thereof, upon and in respect of the matters set forth on the reverse side hereof, and in their discretion, upon any other matter that may properly come before said meeting.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations.
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Continued and to be signed on reverse side