As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2008
January 19, 2016

Registration Statement No. 333-             

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.*

Global Water Resources, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 4941 20-254541290-0632193

(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation of

incorporation or organization)

 

(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

21410 N.N 19th Avenue

Suite 201
#220

Phoenix, AZ 85027

(623) 580-9600

(480) 360-7775

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Trevor T. Hill
Global Water Resources, Inc.

Michael J. Liebman

21410 N.N 19th Avenue

Suite 201
#220

Phoenix, AZ 85027

(623) 580-9600

(480) 360-7775

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

Copies to:

Michael M. Donahey

Jeffrey E. Beck

Jeffrey A. Scudder

Kevin Zen

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.

One Arizona Center

400 East Van Buren

Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202

(602) 382-6000

 
G. William Speer, Esq.
William B. Shearer, Jr., Esq.
Powell Goldstein

Christopher J. Barry

Dorsey & Whitney LLP
One Atlantic Center, 14th Floor
1201 W. Peachtree Street, N.W.
Atlanta, GA 30309
(404) 572-6600

Michael Wager, Esq.
Christopher A. Van Tuyl, Esq.
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey LLP
4900 Key Tower
127 Public Square
Cleveland, OH 44114
(216) 479-8500

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 6100

Seattle, Washington 98104-7043

(206) 903-8800

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

registration statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box.box:  o¨

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.offering:  o¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.offering:  o¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.offering:  o¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Act:

Large accelerated filer 
Large accelerated filer  o
¨
  Accelerated filero¨
Non-accelerated filero¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  Smaller reporting companyox
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

                     
       Proposed Maximum
   Proposed Maximum
     
Title of Each Class of
  Amount to be
   Offering
   Aggregate
   Amount of
 
Securities to be Registered  Registered   Price Per Share(1)   Offering Price(2)   Registration Fee 
Common Stock, $0.01 par value            $50,000,000   $1,965 
 

 

Title of Each Class of
Securities to be Registered
 Amount
to be
Registered(1)
 

Proposed
Maximum

Offering Price
Per Unit(2)

 Proposed
Maximum
Offering Price
 Amount of
Registration Fee

Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share

 1,150,000 $5.15 $5,922,500 $596.40

 

 

(1)Includes shares that may be sold if the underwriter’s option to purchase additional shares is exercised.
(2)Estimated solely for the purposepurposes of computing the amount ofcalculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(o)457(a) under the Securities Act of 1933.
(2)Includes offering1933, as amended, based upon the closing price of shares that the underwriter has the option to purchase to cover over-allotments, if any.
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT, OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(a), MAY DETERMINE.
*The Registrant was incorporated on May 2, 2008 and will consummate a reorganization immediately prior to the effectiveness of this Registration Statement. Accordingly, the Registrant has no historical operations, assets or financial results on an independent basis. The information reported in the enclosed Prospectus assumes the completionJanuary 14, 2016 of the Reorganization unless otherwise noted therein. See “The Reorganization.”common shares of GWR Global Water Resources Corp., which are publicly listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, and the U.S. dollar-Canadian dollar exchange rate at January 14, 2016.

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.


The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities, and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED , 2008JANUARY 19, 2016

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

            Shares

GLOBAL WATER LOGO

LOGO

Common Stock

We are offering              shares of our common stock with this prospectus.

stock. This is our initial public offering and no public market currently exists for shares of our shares.common stock. We anticipate that the initial public offering price will be between $         and $         per share.

We intend to apply to have applied to list ourthe common stock listed on the NasdaqNASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “GWRI”.

We have granted“GWRS.” The common shares of GWR Global Water Resources Corp., which currently owns approximately 47.8% of our outstanding common stock, are publicly listed on the underwriters an option, exercisable within 30 days afterToronto Stock Exchange. Concurrently with the dateconsummation of this prospectus, to purchase up to           additionaloffering, GWR Global Water Resources Corp. will merge with and into us and on the effectiveness of the merger all of the outstanding common shares of GWR Global Water Resources Corp. will be exchanged for shares of our common stock uponstock. See “The Transactions—Reorganization Transaction” for additional information.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the same termsSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, and conditions aswill be subject to reduced public reporting requirements. This prospectus complies with the shares offered by this prospectusrequirements that apply to cover over-allotments, if any.

an issuer that is an emerging growth company.

Investing in our shares of common stock involves risks. See “Risk Factors”Risk Factors beginning on page 7 of this prospectus.7.

   Per
Share
   Total 
Public

Initial public offering price

  $                $              

Underwriting discounts and commissions

  $     $   

Proceeds to Global Water Resources, Inc. us, before expenses

  $     $  

We have granted the underwriter an option to purchase up to              additional shares of our common stock.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commissionother regulatory body has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined ifpassed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus is truthful or complete.prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, on behalf of the underwriters,

The underwriter expects to deliver the shares of common stock to purchasers on or about             .

Roth Capital Partners

Prospectus dated                     , 2008.

JANNEYMONTGOMERYSCOTT LLC
The date of this prospectus is          , 2008.

2016


TABLE OF CONTENTS

   Page 

Prospectus Summary

   1  

Risk Factors

   7  

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

23
23
23
24

   27  

Dividend PolicyIndustry and Market Data

   27  

CapitalizationThe Transactions

   2728  
29
30

   32  

BusinessDividend Policy

   5033  

ManagementCapitalization

   7434  

Dilution

35

Selected Historical and Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Data

36

Business

59

Management

75

Executive Compensation

80

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

83
84
85
87
88
91
91

   92  

Index to Combined Consolidated Financial StatementsPrincipal Stockholders

   F-195  
EX-2.1

EX-2.2Description of Capital Stock

98
EX-2.3

EX-2.4Shares Eligible For Future Sale

100
EX-2.5

EX-2.6Material United States Federal Tax Considerations

102
EX-2.7

EX-2.8Underwriting

106
EX-2.9

EX-2.10Legal Matters

111
EX-3.1

EX-4.2Experts

111
EX-4.3

EX-10.5.1Where You Can Find Additional Information

EX-10.7
EX-10.23
EX-10.24111
EX-10.26
EX-10.27
EX-10.28
EX-10.29
EX-10.30
EX-10.31
EX-10.32
EX-10.33
EX-10.34
EX-10.35
EX-21.1
EX-23.1

Through

Neither we nor the underwriter have authorized anyone to provide any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectuses we have prepared. We take no responsibility for, and including          , 2008 (the 25th day aftercan provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. We are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of our common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus)prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of shares of our common stock. Our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects may have changed since that date.

Until              (25 days after the commencement of our initial public offering), all dealers that effect transactions inbuy, sell, or trade shares of our common stock, whether or not participating in thisour initial public offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This delivery requirement is in addition to the dealers’ obligation of dealers to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with respect to its unsold allotments or subscriptions.


i


PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights key aspects of our business and our offering of common stock that are described more fullyinformation contained in greater detail elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary is not complete and does not contain all of the information that you should consider beforein making anyour investment decision. You should read the entire prospectus carefully including the Risk Factors beginning on page 7 and our financial statements and related notes beginning onpage F-3,before making an investment decision.

in our common stock. You should carefully consider, among other things, our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this prospectus. Unless the context requires otherwise, requires, the information set forthreferences in this Prospectus gives effectprospectus to the proposed transactions (the “Reorganization”) described herein under “The Reorganization,” and the terms “Company,” “we”“we,” “us” and “our” refersrefer to Global Water Resources, Inc. and to Global Water Resources, LLC, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries after giving effectconsolidated subsidiaries. All references to “CAD$” and “Canadian dollars” are to the Reorganization. Unless otherwise indicated, the information set forth in this Prospectus does not give effectlawful currency of Canada and references to “$,” “US$” and “U.S. dollars” are to the exerciselawful currency of the Underwriters’ over-allotment option.United States.

Our Company

We are a leading water resource management company that providesowns, operates and manages water, wastewater and recycled water utility services. Recycled water is highly treated and purified wastewater that is distributed throughout theutilities in strategically located communities, we serve for a variety of non-potable uses through a separate distribution system of purple pipes.principally in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona. We callseek to deploy our integrated approach, which we refer to as “Total Water Management,” or “TWM,” a term which we use to mean managing the entire water cycle by owning and operating the water, wastewater and recycled water utilities within the same geographic areas in order to both to conserve water and to maximize its total economic and social value. Our application of TWM has provenWe use Total Water Management to be effective as a means of water scarcity management that promotespromote sustainable communities in areas where management expectswe expect growth to outpace the existing potable water supply.

We currently own and operate 16 water and wastewater utilities in strategically targeted communities in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona. We have grown significantly since our formation in 2003, with total revenues increasing from $4.9 million to $25.8 million from 2004 to 2007, and service connections increasing from 8,145 to 38,682 from December 31, 2004 to December 31, 2007, with the potential capacity in our planning areas to serve approximately two million service connections in the future.
Our TWM model focuses on the broad issues of water supply and scarcity and applies principles of water conservation through water reclamation and reuse. ItsOur basic premise is that ourthe world’s water supply is limited but renewable, and shouldyet can be managed to ensure that development is sustainable instretched significantly through effective planning, the faceuse of water scarcity. Key elements of TWM include:
• planning regional integrated water and wastewater facilities;
• stretching a limited resource by deploying the appropriate water for the appropriate use;
• integrating water, wastewater and recycled water treatment and delivery of recycled water through a separate distribution system of purple pipes;
• gaining market and regulatory acceptance of broader utilization of recycled water; and
• combining proven technologies with a water scarcity management platform that provides a socially responsible approach to sustainable community growth.
In addition to providing regulated water, wastewater and recycled water services, we engageand by providing individuals and communities resources that promote wise water usage practices.

We currently own nine water and wastewater utilities in activities that generate additional revenue, including financing agreementsstrategically targeted communities principally in metropolitan Phoenix. We currently serve more than 50,000 people in approximately 20,000 homes within our 332 square miles of certificated service areas, which are serviced by five wholly-owned regulated operating subsidiaries as of September 30, 2015. Approximately 94.9% of our active service connections are customers of our Santa Cruz and Palo Verde utilities, which are located within a single service area. We have grown significantly since our formation in 2003, with developerstotal revenues increasing from $4.9 million in 2004 to $32.6 million in 2014, and builders, the creation and resaletotal service connections increasing from 8,113 as of stored water credits and provisionDecember 31, 2004 to 38,620 as of back-office billing and laboratory servicesSeptember 30, 2015, with regionally planned service areas large enough to third parties. In the future, we may also provide water transmission pipeline services to communities that are importing water to fulfill their water supply needs.

serve approximately two million service connections.

Our Growth Strategy

Our objectivelong-term goal is to become one of the largest investor-owned operator of integrated water and wastewater utilities in areas of the arid western U.S.United States where water scarcity management is necessary for long-term economic sustainability and growth.


1


Our growth strategy involves the following elements:elements listed below:

acquiring or forming utilities in the path of prospective population growth;

expanding our service areas geographically and organically growing our customer base within those areas; and
• acquiring or forming utilities in the path of prospective population growth;
• expanding our service areas geographically and organically growing our customer base;
• deploying our TWM approach into these utilities and service areas;
• structuring and operating related unregulated businesses; and
• replicating our business model in areas of water scarcity.

deploying our Total Water Management approach into these utilities and service areas.

We believe this plan can be executed in our current service areas as well asand in other geographic areas where water scarcity management is necessary to support long-term growth and in which regulatory authorities recognize the need for water conservation through water recycling.



Our Competitive Strengths

Our Utilities Are Located in Areas of Strong Population Growth Where We Have Contracted Service Areas

Well Positioned

We have three regional planning areas located in the metropolitan Phoenix area with area-wide permits and contractual service rights relating to over 500 square miles of territory. Our Maricopa-Casa Grande regional planning area and Eloy regional planning area are located in Pinal County, Arizona. Pinal County is rapidly changing from primarily rural to an area of suburbanization. According to a U.S. Census estimate, Pinal County grew by 117% from a population of 179,727 in 2000 to 393,813 in 2013, and by 4.8% between years 2010 and 2013, ranking it as a third fastest growing county in Arizona based on percentage population growth for Long-Term Growth.this period.

Our West Valley regional planning area is located in Maricopa County. Maricopa County gained 797,927 residents between 2000 and 2011, and 196,047 residents between years 2010 and 2013. Maricopa County is the fastest growing county in Arizona and Maricopa County is now the fourth largest county in the U.S. with approximately 4.0 million residents.

Modern Infrastructure Provides Foundation for Future Growth With Low Future Capital Expenditures

We believe that as demand for new homes continues to recover in the regions we serve, there will be opportunities for growth, particularly in the Maricopa-Casa Grande region, where our local utilities have considerable infrastructure already in place. As a result of our investment in modern infrastructure, we expect our regulated utilities business in our current service areas to have relatively low capital expenditures for the foreseeable future because greater than 90% of our infrastructure was built in the last twelve years compared to most U.S. drinking water infrastructure, which were built 50 or more years ago.

Leader in Utilization of Technology and Innovation

We use technology to reduce costs, increase revenues and save water. We focus on technological innovations that allow us to deliver high-quality water and customer service with lower potential for human error, delays and inefficiencies. Our comprehensive technology platform includes FATHOM™, which includes customer information systems, automated meter reading and geographical information system technologies, and supervisory control and data acquisition systems, which we use to map and monitor our physical assets and water resources on an automated, real-time basis with fewer employees than the standard water utility model requires. Our innovative approaches to utility planning, water conservation and technology utilization have led to our development of strong relationships with key regulatory bodies.

Unique and Proven Advanced Technology Platform

We believe that we are one of the only water utilities that has developed its own integrated suite of advanced services, which we branded as FATHOM™. Initially developed to support and optimize our utility operations, implementation of the FATHOM™ system has consistently demonstrated cost savings for third party utilities and provides opportunities for increased utility revenues. We sold the FATHOM™ business in June 2013 (retaining a minority ownership position, which is currently approximately 8%), although we continue to use and benefit from the internally developed FATHOM™ service suite. For additional information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Events—Sale of FATHOM™ Business.”



Proven Ability to Acquire and Consolidate

We have acquired or formed 16 regulated water and wastewater utilities (four of which have subsequently been divested and increased our totalthree of which have been merged), five of which are operating with active customer service area from 18 square miles at December 31, 2004 to more than 375 square miles at December 31, 2007. These service areas include large, undeveloped service territories that provide for predictable and significant organic growth for the foreseeable future. Additionally, our planning areas have the potential capacity to serve approximately two million service connections in the future.

Demonstrated Ability to Align Green and Socially Responsible Practices into our Profitable Growth Company.connections. We have developed a profitable model that allowssuccessfully consolidated the operations, management, infrastructure, technology and employees of these utilities. Not all utilities acquired by us to employ resource conservation. We have integrated smart technologies into a water scarcity management platform that provides a socially responsible approach to sustainable community growth. Our model improves operating efficiencies while also leveragingcan accommodate the increased value of recycled water as an emerging renewable resource.
Replicable Total Water Management Business Model.  Our business model, as it is highly replicablenecessary that we own both the water and we have demonstrated this successfully in Arizona. Specifically, our West Valley operations are modeled after and built on the successes we achieved in our Maricopa-Casa Grande planning area. Our model is effective in any high growth region of current or future water scarcity. We are currentlywastewater infrastructure in the processarea. In those cases, we seek to improve operational and administrative efficiencies of expanding into Idahothe utility using our technology platform and Nevada, demonstratingthrough economies of scale. We believe that there is demand for our TWM-based platform beyond Arizona.
Entrepreneurial, Innovative Management Approach.  In contrastsuccess to the traditional water utility model built exclusively on rate basedate engenders positive relationships and volume accretion, our management team has an entrepreneurial focus emphasizing growthcredibility with regulators, municipalities, developers and efficiency. Underpinning this entrepreneurial approach, we have significant regulatorycustomers in both existing and permitting experience in our industry and in the regions that we serve. Our management team also has a record of success in acquiring accretive utilities, integrating these companies and managing infrastructure deployment in periods of high growth.
Company Information
We were organized as a Delaware limited liability company on September 24, 2003. Immediately prior toprospective service areas.

The Transactions

Concurrently with the consummation of this offering, weGWR Global Water Resources Corp. (“GWRC”), which currently owns approximately 47.8% of our outstanding common stock, will be reorganizedmerge with and into the Company with the Company surviving as a Delaware corporation, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including GWRC’s shareholder approval. At the effective time of the merger, following a100.68-for-1 forward stock split with respect to our common stock, holders of GWRC’s common shares will receive one share of the Company’s common stock for each outstanding common share of GWRC. We refer to this as the “Reorganization Transaction.” The Reorganization Transaction and the consummation of this offering will be contingent upon each other and will occur simultaneously. In addition, following the consummation of this offering and the Reorganization Transaction, we plan to refinance all of our tax-exempt bonds. For additional information, see “The Transactions” elsewhere in this prospectus.

Implications of Being an Emerging Growth Company

As a company with less than $1.0 billion in revenue during our last fiscal year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). An emerging growth company may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include:

a requirement to have only two years of audited financial statements and only two years of related management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations disclosure;

reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in periodic reports;

no requirement for non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation or golden parachute arrangements; and

an exemption from the auditor attestation requirement in the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”).

We may take advantage of these provisions for up to five years or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company. In future years, we will cease to be an emerging growth company if we have more than $1.0 billion in annual revenue, have more than $700 million in market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates, or issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt securities over a three-year period. We may choose to take advantage of some but not all of these reduced requirements.

We have elected to take advantage of some of the reduced disclosure obligations regarding financial statements and executive compensation in this prospectus and may elect to take advantage of other reduced requirements in future filings. As a result, the information we provide to our stockholders may be different than you might receive from other public reporting companies in which you hold equity interests.



The JOBS Act permits an emerging growth company, like us, to take advantage of an extended transition period to comply with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies. We may choose to take advantage of this provision and, as a result, we would not be required to comply with new or revised accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies.

Summary Risk Factors

Participating in this offering involves substantial risk. Our ability to execute our strategy is also subject to certain risks. The risks described under “The Reorganization.”the heading “Risk Factors” included elsewhere in this prospectus may cause us to be unable to successfully execute all or part of our strategy. Some of the most significant challenges and risks include the following:

we may have difficulty accomplishing our growth strategy within and outside of our current service areas;

our operations of regulated utilities are currently located exclusively in the state of Arizona;

our active service connections are primarily concentrated in one water utility and one wastewater utility located in the same service area;

our growth depends significantly on increased residential and commercial development in our service areas;

the growth of our customer base and revenues could be materially and adversely affected by a deep or prolonged slowdown of development or population growth within our service areas;

any growth that may occur outside the location and capacity of our existing infrastructure may require significantly more capital expenditures than currently anticipated;

we may not be permitted to increase our rates;

we may be required to alter our existing treatment facilities or build additional facilities as a result of changes to environmental and other regulations;

seasonal fluctuations and other weather-related conditions, such as droughts, could adversely affect the supply of and demand for our services;

inadequate water and wastewater supplies could have a material adverse effect upon our ability to achieve the customer growth;

our water and wastewater systems are subject to condemnation by governmental authorities;

our ability to expand into new service areas and to expand current water and wastewater service depends on approval from regulatory agencies; and

if our financial performance deteriorates, we may need to decrease or eliminate our dividends.

Our Corporation Information

Global Water Resources, Inc., the issuer of the common stock in this offering, was incorporated as a Delaware corporation on May 2, 2008. Our principal executive offices are located at 21410 N.N 19th Avenue Suite 201,#220, Phoenix, ArizonaAZ 85027, and our telephone number is(623) 580-9600. (480) 360-7775. Our website address is www.gwresources.com. The information on ourOur website is not part of this prospectus.

You should carefully considerand the information contained in the “Risk Factors” section oftherein or connected thereto shall not be deemed to be incorporated into this prospectus beginning on page 7 before you decide to purchase our common stock.
or the registration statement of which it forms a part.


2




The Offering

Issuer

Global Water Resources, Inc.

Common stock offered by us

             shares
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering           shares
Use of proceedsTo repay $      of outstanding indebtedness, fund approximately $      of capital expenditures, finance potential future acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.
Nasdaq Global Select Market symbolGWRI
Dividend policyWe intend to pay only nominal cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, as we intend to apply most of our earnings to working capital in order to finance our growth and support our operations. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on many factors, including our financial condition, results of operations, capital and liquidity requirements, legal and regulatory requirements and other factors our board of directors deems relevant. See “Dividend Policy.”
At our request, the underwriters have reserved up to     % of the offered shares for sale at the initial public offering price through a directed share program to our directors, officers, employees or other persons associated with us. The number of shares of common stock available for sale to the general public will be reduced by the number of directed shares purchased by participants in the program. Any directed shares not purchased will be offered by the underwriters to the general public on the same basis as all other shares of common stock offered.
The number of shares of common stock that will be outstanding upon completion of this offering is based on shares outstanding as of          , 2008. This number excludes           shares of our common stock reserved for possible issuance under our 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Except as otherwise indicated, information in this prospectus assumes:

• the completion of the Reorganization described beginning on page 24; and
• no exercise by the underwriters of the over-allotment

Underwriter’s option to purchase additional shares of common stock in this offering.from us

             shares


3

Common stock to be outstanding after this offering

             shares

Use of proceeds

We estimate that our net proceeds from the sale of our common stock that we are offering will be approximately $         million, assuming an initial public offering price of $         per share, which is the midpoint of the price range on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for working capital and other general corporate purposes.

Dividend policy

Following the completion of this offering, we intend to pay a regular monthly dividend on our common stock of $0.02 per share ($0.24 per share annually), or an aggregate of approximately $4.7 million on an annual basis. However, our future dividend policy is subject to our compliance with applicable law, and depending on, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, level of indebtedness, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, restrictions in our debt agreements and in any preferred stock we may issue in the future, business prospects and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. See “Dividend Policy” and “Risk Factors—We cannot assure you that we will pay dividends on our common stock, and our indebtedness could limit our ability to pay dividends on our common stock.”

Risk factors

See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 7 to read about factors you should consider before buying shares of our common stock.

Proposed NASDAQ Global Market symbol

“GWRS”

Unless otherwise indicated, this prospectus assumes no exercise by the underwriter of its option to purchase additional shares of our common stock and gives effect to a 100.68-for-1 forward stock split with respect to our common stock that will be effected prior to the completion of this offering in connection with the Reorganization Transaction.




Summary Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma CondensedConsolidated Financial Statements

Data

The following table provides a summary of oursummarizes selected historical combinedand pro forma consolidated financial information atdata for Global Water Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries. We have derived the dates andsummary consolidated statement of operations data for the periods indicated. The historicalyear ended December 31, 2014 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 has been derived2014 from our audited historical combined consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Because the Reorganization will be consummated immediately prior to the effectivenessThe summary consolidated statement of this offering, we are presenting the historical financialoperations data for Global Water Resources, LLC, including its subsidiaries,the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and Global Water Management, LLC on a combined basis for all periods presented.

The summary unaudited pro forma combined2015 and the consolidated financial statementsbalance sheet data as of September 30, 2015 have been derived from our audited historical combinedunaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and adjusted as described below. The summaryappearing elsewhere in this prospectus.

We have derived the pro forma consolidated financial data from our unaudited pro forma combinedcondensed consolidated financial statements have been preparedinformation appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The summary pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2015 is adjusted to give effect to the following transactionsReorganization Transaction. The summary pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations data for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 is adjusted to give effect to the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company, Inc. (“Valencia Water Company”) as if theythe transaction had occurred on January 1, 2007, in2014.

The summary of our consolidated financial data set forth below should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and the case of the summary condensedrelated notes and our unaudited pro forma statement of operations, and as if they had occurred on December 31, 2007, in the case of the summary condensed unaudited pro forma balance sheet:

•��the Reorganization;
• the incurrence by Global Water Resources, LLC of $26.0 million of additional indebtedness under its current revolving credit facility; and
• the application of the proceeds of such additional indebtedness to the redemption by Global Water Resources, LLC of its outstanding preferred equity interests and to the redemption by Global Water Management, LLC of its outstanding preferred equity interests.
The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable. The summary unaudited pro forma combined consolidated financial data is for informational purposes only and does not purport to represent what our results of operations or financial position actually would have been if the transactions described above had occurred at any date, and such data does not purport to project the results of operations for any future period.
Our historical combined consolidated financial data is not necessarily indicative of our future performance or what our financial position and results of operations would have been if we had operated as a taxable corporation or engaged in the other transactions reflected in the summary unaudited pro forma financial data table during the periods shown. Because the data in this table is only a summary and does not provide all of the data contained in our financial statements, the information should be read in conjunction with “Use of Proceeds,” “Capitalization,” “Selected Historical Combined Consolidated Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the financial statements and related notes, thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.


4


                     
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2005  2006  2007  2007  2007 
     Pro Forma
  Pro
 
  Historical  Adjustments(1)  Forma 
  (In thousands) 
 
Condensed statement of income:
                    
Operating revenues $12,943  $20,849  $25,809  $  $25,809 
Operating expenses                    
Operations and maintenance  792   1,467   2,637      2,637 
General and administrative  3,413   6,754   9,974      9,974 
Depreciation and amortization  3,338   5,601   8,613      8,613 
                     
Total operating expenses  7,543   13,822   21,224      21,224 
                     
Operating income  5,400   7,027   4,585      4,585 
                     
Other income (expense)                    
Interest income  2   32   380      380 
Interest expense  (7)  (1,448)  (4,329)  (1,769)  (6,098)
Other, net  19   (34)  (31)     (31)
                     
Total other income (expense)  14   (1,450)  (3,980)  (1,769)  (5,749)
                     
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  5,414   5,577   605   (1,769)  (1,164)
                     
Income tax expense (benefit)     (740)  (1,404)  1,008   (396)
                     
Income (loss) from continuing operations $5,414  $6,317  $2,009  $(2,777) $(768)
                     
Pro forma earnings per share                    
(1)The pro forma 2007 financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the additional interest expense for an increase in our bank loan, calculated at an average rate of 6.8%, to redeem $26.0 million of our preferred equity interests, and the income tax expense that would have been incurred at statutory rates had we been taxedas well as a corporation throughout 2007.

5


                 
  As of December 31, 
  2006  2007  2007  2007 
     Pro Forma
    
  Historical  Adjustments(2)  Pro Forma 
  (In thousands) 
 
Condensed balance sheet data:
                
Property, plant and equipment net of depreciation $172,749  $230,232  $  $230,232 
Current assets  3,825   5,504      5,504 
Goodwill  45,809   45,809      45,809 
Other intangible assets — net  36,643   33,623      33,623 
Other assets  6,285   12,897      12,897 
                 
Total assets  265,311   328,065      328,065 
Current liabilities  39,879   29,388      30,929 
Bonds payable  36,495   90,115      90,115 
Bank loans payable  24,088   38,042   26,015   64,057 
Deferred revenue and prepaid ICFA fees  40,582   39,235      39,235 
Advances in aid of construction  51,064   69,405      69,405 
Acquisition liability  44,453   42,503      40,962 
Other liabilities  9,850   7,962      7,962 
                 
Total liabilities  246,411   316,650   26,015   342,664 
                 
Members’ equity  18,900   11,415   (26,015)  (14,600)
(2)In connection with the financing, we will redeem $26.0 million of our contributed capital through the redemption of all outstanding preferred equity interests of Global Water Resources, LLC and Global Water Management, LLC.

6


RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves risk. Before you decide to purchase our common stock, you should carefully consider these risk factors together with all of the other information included in this prospectus, including the information contained in the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”Operations.”

      Pro Forma       
   September 30,
2015
  September 30,
2015
  December 31,
2014
    
   (dollars in thousands)    

ASSETS:

   

Net property, plant and equipment

  $193,611   $193,611   $240,424   

Current assets

   26,001    26,176    12,293   

Other assets

   25,296    25,296    54,884   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total Assets

  $244,908   $245,083   $307,601   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

LIABILITIES:

     

Current liabilities

  $13,486   $13,669   $13,630   

Noncurrent liabilities

   209,571    209,807    266,291   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total Liabilities

   223,057    223,476    279,921   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   21,851    21,607    27,680   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

  $244,908   $245,083   $307,601   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  
      Pro Forma       
   

Nine Months

Ended

  

Nine Months

Ended

  

Nine Months

Ended

  Year Ended 
   September 30,
2015
  September 30,
2015
  September 30,
2014
  December 31,
2014
 
   (dollars in thousands, except per share data) 

Revenues

  $24,847   $21,581   $24,646   $32,559  

Operating expenses

   19,736    17,109    (29,273  (22,232
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income

   5,111    4,472    53,919    54,791  

Total other income (expense)

   37,179    (5,897  (4,626  (6,855
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

   42,290    (1,425  49,293    47,936  

Income tax benefit (expense)

   (20,897  510    16,477    16,995  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

  $21,393   $(915 $65,770   $64,931  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

  $117.63   $(0.05)(1)  $361.27   $356.67  

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

  $117.63   $(0.05)(1)  $361.27   $356.67  

(1)As adjusted to give effect to a 100.68-for-1 forward stock split with respect to our common stock that will be effected prior to the completion of this offering in connection with the Reorganization Transaction.



RISK FACTORS

This offering and investing in our combinedcommon stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information contained in this prospectus, including our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere inand the related notes appearing at the end of this prospectus, and the notes thereto.before deciding to invest in our common stock. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our profitability,business, prospects, operating results of operations, liquidity and cash flowsfinancial condition could be adversely affected, which in turn could adversely affectsuffer materially, the valuetrading price of our common stock.stock could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business

and Industry

Our growth depends significantly on increased residential and commercial development in our service areas.

Our revenue growth depends on population growth and successful residential and commercial development within our service areas. Real estate development is a cyclical industry and the growth rate of development, especially residential development, during 2006 and 2007, both nationally and in Arizona, has been significantly below the rates for recent prior years. According to Arizona State University Realty Studies, residential building permits in Arizona’s Maricopa and Pinal Counties decreased by 17% and 28%, respectively, from 2006 to 2007.
Sales of single family residences are affected by national and regional economic factors, including:
• interest rates and general levels of economic output;
• levels of activity in the local real estate market;
• the state of domestic credit markets, mortgage standards and availability of credit;
• competition from other builders and other projects in the area and other states;
• costs and availability of labor and materials;
• government regulations affecting land development, homebuilding and mortgage financing;
• increased commute times and fuel costs that may affect the desirability of outlying suburbs; and
• environmental issues.
A deepened or prolonged slowdown of the development process and growth rate within the various developments in our service areas could materially and adversely affect the growth of our customer base and revenues.
Development in our service areas is also contingent upon construction or acquisition of major public improvements such as arterial streets, drainage facilities, telephone and electrical facilities, recreational facilities, street lighting and local in-tract improvements such as site grading. Many of these improvements are built by municipalities with public financing, and municipal resources and access to capital may not be sufficient to support development in areas of rapid population growth. If municipalities, developers, builders or homeowners are unable, financially or otherwise, to make the improvements necessary to complete new residential or commercial developments, our potential revenue growth from new water and wastewater connections within such developments would be reduced.
We may have difficulty accomplishing our growth strategy within and outside of our current service areas.areas, which would cause us to rely more heavily on regulatory rate increases to increase our revenues.

Our ability to expand our business, both within our current service areas and into new areas, involves significant risks, including, but not limited to:

• not receiving or maintaining necessary regulatory permits, licenses and approvals;


7


not receiving or maintaining necessary regulatory permits, licenses or approvals;

downturns in economic or population growth and development in our service areas;

risks related to planning and commencing new operations, including inaccurate assessment of the demand for water, engineering and construction difficulties and inability to begin operations as scheduled;

droughts or water shortages that could increase water conservation efforts to a point that materially reduces revenue;
• downturns in economic or population growth and development in our service areas;
• risks related to planning and commencing new operations, including inaccurate assessment of the demand for water, engineering and construction difficulties and inability to begin operations as scheduled;
• droughts or water shortages that could increase water conservation efforts to a point that materially reduces our consumption-based revenue;
• regulatory restrictions or other factors that could adversely affect our access to sources of water supply;
• our potential inability to identify suitable acquisition opportunities or to form the relationships with developers and municipalities necessary to form strategic partnerships; and
• barriers to entry presented by existing water utilities in prospective service areas.

regulatory restrictions or other factors that could adversely affect our access to sources of water supply;

our potential inability to identify suitable acquisition opportunities or to form the relationships with developers and municipalities necessary to form strategic partnerships; and

barriers to entry presented by existing water utilities in prospective service areas.

If we are unable to execute our growth strategy effectively, we will need to rely more heavily on regulatory rate increases to increase our revenue.

Any pending or future acquisitions we decide to undertake involve risks.
An important element However, recent Rate Decision No. 74364 stipulates that none of our growth strategy is the acquisition or development of other waterutilities can file another rate application before May 31, 2016. Moreover, Global Water-Santa Cruz Water Company (“Santa Cruz”) and wastewater utilities. The negotiation of potential acquisitions and development of new projects could require us to incur significant costs and expose us to significant risks, including:
• risks relating to the condition of assets acquired;
• operating risks, including equipment, technology and supply problems, regulatory requirements and approvals necessary for acquisitions;
• risks that potential acquisitions may require the disproportionate attention of our senior management, which could distract them from the management of our existing business; and
• risks related to our ability to retain experienced personnel of the acquired company.
These issues could have a material adverse effect on our business and our ability to finance our operations. The businesses and other assets we acquire in the futureGlobal Water-Palo Verde Utilities Company (“Palo Verde”) may not achieve sufficient revenue or profitability to justify our investment,file for another rate increase before May 31, 2017. See “Management’s Discussion and any difficulties we encounter in the integration process could interfere with our operationsAnalysis of Financial Condition and reduce operating margins. Acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuanceResults of our equity securities, incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, fluctuations in quarterly results and acquisition-related expenses.
Operations—Recent Rate Case Activity” for additional information.

If we do not manage our anticipated growth effectively, we may not be able to develop or implement the infrastructure necessary to support our operations and could suffer a loss of profitability.

We have a limited operating history. Since our formation in 2003, we have grown rapidly, with our total revenues increasing from $4.9 million in 2004 to $25.8 million in 2007, and service connections increasing from 8,145 as of December 31, 2004 to 38,682 as of December 31, 2007. We have also expanded geographically, from 18 square miles of planning areas at December 31, 2004 to more than 375 square miles at December 31, 2007. Our growth has been driven principally by acquisitions and by organic growth resulting from increased development and service connections within our existing service areas.
Although we may not be able to achieve similar growth or grow at all, in future periods, we expect to continue to expand significantly our facilities, infrastructure, research and development, marketing, testing, management and administrative operations as well as our financial and accounting controls. This expansion has placed, and will continue to place, strain on our management and administrative, operational, technical and financial infrastructure. If our management is unable to manage growth effectively, the quality of our


8


services, our ability to attract and retain key personnel, and our business or prospects could be harmed significantly. To manage growth effectively, we must:
• continue to expand our water management capacity;
• continue to enhance our technology, operations and financial and management systems;
• maintain and improve effective internal control over financial and compliance reporting and disclosure controls and procedures; and
• expand, train and manage our employee base.
We may not be able to manage effectively any expansion in one or more of these areas, and our failure to do so could harm our ability to maintain or increase revenues and operating results. Our expenses incurred in pursuing such growth could increase without a corresponding increase in our revenue base, which could decrease our operating results and profit margin. In addition, our growth may require us to make significant capital expenditures or incur other significant expenses and may divert the attention of our personnel from our core business operations, any of which could affect our financial performance adversely.
Our ability to expand into new service areas and to expand current water and wastewater service depends on approval from regulatory agencies.
In Arizona, the Arizona Corporation Commission (ACC) is the regulatory authority that oversees the formation, expansion and ongoing operations of private water and wastewater companies. The ACC has authority, among other things, to determine service territories for utility providers. In order for us to provide water or wastewater service, we must obtain a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CC&N) for a service area before we can service that area. In addition, we must demonstrate to the Arizona Department of Water Resources that there exists a 100-year water supply and obtain either a certificate of assured water supply, which applies to a specific subdivision, or a designation of assured water supply, which applies to our entire service area. Further, our wastewater facilities require Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and/or U.S. Environmental Protection Agency permits that regulate, among other things, the level of discharges from our facilities, the size of our facilities and the location of our facilities. Any inability to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals, assured water supplies or environmental permits would limit our ability to expand our water or wastewater service areas.
New or stricter regulatory standards or other governmental actions could increase our compliance and operating costs, which could cause our profitability to suffer, particularly if we are unable to increase our rates to offset such costs.
Water and wastewaterregulated utilities are generally subject to regulation by water, environmental, public utility and health and safety regulators, and we are required to obtain environmental permits from governmental agencies in order to operate our facilities. Regulations relate to, among other things, standards and criteria for drinking water quality and for wastewater discharges, customer service and service delivery standards, waste disposal and raw water abstraction limits and rates and charges for our regulated services. While we strive to operate our business in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, there may be instances in the future when we are not in compliance with these evolving laws, regulations and permits.
Our costs of complying with current and future governmental laws and regulations could adversely affect our business or results of operations. If we fail to comply with these laws, regulations or permits, we could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by regulators and our operations could be curtailed or shut down. We could also be exposed to product liability or breach of contract claims by third parties resulting from our non-compliance. These laws and regulations are complex and change frequently, and these changes may cause us to incur costs in connection with the remediation of actions that were lawful when they were taken.
We may incur higher compliance or remediation costs than expected in any particular period and may not be able to pass those increased costs along to our customers immediately through rate increases. This is


9


because we must obtain regulatory approval to increase our rates. Obtaining approval for rate increases can be time-consuming and costly. State regulatory authorities must approve our rates and may change their rules and policies, particularly when there are changes in its personnel for any reason, including changes in government administration. We may face delays and difficulties in obtaining approval to raise rates, and there could be a significant gap between the timing of increased expenses and our ability to recover those expenses that could adversely affect our profitability, results of operations, liquidity and cash flows.
In addition, any government or government agency that regulates our operations may enact legislation or adopt new regulations that could have an adverse effect on our business, including:
• restricting ownership or investment;
• providing for the expropriation of our assets by the government through condemnation or similar proceedings;
• providing for changes to water and wastewater quality standards;
• requiring cancellation or renegotiation of, or unilateral changes to, agreements relating to our provision of water and wastewater services;
• changing regulatory or legislative emphasis on water conservation in comparison to other goals and initiatives;
• promoting an increase of competition among water companies within our designated service areas;
• requiring the provision of water or wastewater services at no charge or at reduced prices;
• adversely changing tax, legal or regulatory requirements, including environmental regulations and changing the imposition of additional costs on our operations, including but not limited to changes adopted in response to global climate change;
• changes in the charges applied to raw water abstraction;
• changes in rate making policies; or
• restrictions relating to water use and supply, including restrictions on use, increased offsetting groundwater replenishment obligations, changes to the character of groundwater rights and settlement of Native American claims.
We extend financing to developers, and if completion of the development does not occur or is delayed, or if our use of this financing is opposed or curtailed by our regulators, we could experience a loss of or significant delay in our recovery of our investment as well as difficulties in implementing our business model.
We extend water and wastewater infrastructure financing to developers and builders through Infrastructure Coordination and Financing Agreements (“ICFAs”). These agreements are contracts with developers or builders in which we coordinate and fund the construction of water, wastewater and recycled water plants that we will own and operate when construction is complete. Our investment is significant, as we construct facilities with the capacity to serve an entire region, as opposed to a single development. Builders pay usagreed-upon fees upon specified development events that allow us to recover a portion of the carrying costs and time value of invested equity relating to our construction of regional plants with excess capacity. Cash received from ICFAs is deferred and recognized as revenue when water meters are installed and service begins to a particular lot. Revenue from ICFAs accounted for 25.6% of our total revenue for 2007.
Because the bulk of our investment is not repaid until development receives platting approval, we cannot predict or control the timing of our collection of our fees and could incur substantial carrying costs on our infrastructure investment. If a developer encounters difficulties that result in a complete or partial abandonment of the development or a significant delay in its completion, we will have planned, built and invested in infrastructure that will not be supported by development and will not generate revenue for us. As a


10


result, our return on our investment and revenue stream could be adversely affected, particularly during a real estate market downturn such as the one currently being experienced in Arizona and the U.S. generally.
Our use of ICFAs is the subject of an administrative complaint before the ACC by one of our competitors, and the general use of ICFAs is under review in a generic docket proceeding before the ACC. If the ACC or regulatory authorities in states in which we conduct future operations were to restrict or prohibit our use of ICFAs, deem all or a portion of our ICFA revenue to be an advance in aid of construction or contribution in aid of construction or otherwise regulate this revenue, our rate base could be reduced and our ability to finance regional infrastructure planning and execute our total water management and growth strategy would be adversely affected. See Note 13 to our Combined Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our water and wastewater systems are subject to condemnation by governmental authorities.
Arizona law provides for the acquisition of public utility property by governmental agencies through their power of eminent domain, also known as condemnation, in cases in which doing so is necessary and in the public interest. Arizona law also entitles the owner to receive the fair market value of any property ultimately taken by eminent domain. In 2007, our Cave Creek Water Company subsidiary’s assets were sold to the Town of Cave Creek, Arizona for $19.5 million as a result of condemnation proceedings initiated by the town. The assets of Pacer Equities Inc., a related holding company, were also sold. Additionally, our Water Utility of Greater Buckeye subsidiary was the subject of condemnation proceedings that we settled successfully in 2007, in that we continue to own the assets of the utility. Although we received compensation for the assets conveyed to the Town of Cave Creek in an amount determined to represent fair market value under applicable law and would be entitled to receive such value in any future condemnation proceedings, the fair value of the assets condemned may not always exceed their book value. Condemnation also results in a loss of revenue from the operations of the affected utility in addition to increased legal costs and diversion of management resources.
Our operations are located exclusively in the state of Arizona, which increases the impact of local conditions on our results of operations.
Our

The customers of our regulated utilities are currently located exclusively in the state of Arizona. As a result, we cannot diversify or mitigate the risks presented by local regulatory, economic, demographic and weather changesconditions in this area. An adverse change in any of these conditions would therefore affect our profitability, results of operations, liquidity and cash flows more significantly than if weour utilities also operated in other geographic areas.

We face risks associated with the design, constructionOur active service connections are primarily concentrated in one water utility and operationone wastewater utility.

At September 30, 2015, we had 37,638 active service connections, of which approximately 94.9% are serviced by our systems that may adversely affectSanta Cruz water utility and our businessPalo Verde wastewater utility. Both our Santa Cruz and financial condition.

We take responsibility for the design, construction, installation and maintenance of our water treatment, reclamation and distribution systems. We could be adversely affected by a failure to complete our construction projects on time or on budget, and a substantial delayPalo

Verde utilities are located in the progress of construction due to adverse weather, work stoppages, shortages of materials, non-issuances of permits, nonperformance of suppliers or contractors or other factors could result in a material increase in the overall cost of the project.

We cannot guarantee that our systems will operate as designed or be free from defects.same service area. If, they fail to operate properly, such failure could cause significant public harm. If there are defects in our systems or if significant reliability, quality or performance problems develop with respect to our systems or services, this may have a number of negative effects on our profitability, results of operations, liquidity and cash flows, including:
• loss of revenues;
• diversion of management and development resources and the attention of engineering personnel;
• significant customer relations problems;


11


• increased repair, support and insurance expenses;
• adverse regulatory actions; and
• legal actions for damages by our customers, including but not limited to damages based on commercial losses and effects on human health.
We are subject to industrial risks that could adversely affect our results of operations.
The operations of our water and wastewater treatment plants involve physical, chemical and biological processes and the use of pumps, generators and other industrial equipment. As a result, our operations are subject to various industrial risks, including chemical spills, discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases, effects resulting from confined operating spaces, fires, mechanical failures, storage tank leaks and electric shock. These risks can cause personal injury, loss of life, catastrophic damage to or destruction of property and equipment or environmental damage. They may also result in an unanticipated interruption or suspension of our operations and the imposition of liability. The loss or shutdown over an extended period of operations at any of our treatment facilities or any losses relating to these risks could have a material adverse impact on our profitability, results of operations, liquidity and cash flows.
Contamination to our water supply may result in disruption in our services, loss of credibility and potential liability that could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Our water supplies are subject to contamination, including contamination from arsenic and other naturally-occurring compounds, chemicals and pollution resulting from man-made sources and terrorist attacks. We could also experience problems with our distribution system that could result in delivery of non-potable water for potable uses, as in the case of improper pipe installation or cross-connection. If our water supply is contaminated, we may have to interrupt the use of that supply until we are able to substitute the flow of water from an uncontaminated source. In addition, we may incur significant costs in order to treat the contaminated source by expanding our current treatment facilities, using treatment facilities operated by others or developing new treatment methods. We could also be held liable for consequences arising out of human exposure to hazardous substances in our water supplies or other environmental damage, and our insurance policies may not be sufficient to cover the costs of these claims, which could be significant. If we are unable to substitute water supply adequately from an uncontaminated source or treat the contaminated water in a cost-effective manner, our business, financial condition, liquidity and cash flows may be adversely affected through a decline in revenue or higher operating costs.
We are subject to environmental risks that may subject us toclean-up costs or litigation that could adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.
Under various federal and state environmental laws, regulations and ordinances, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal, remediation or containment of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. These liabilities are not limited to a potential effect on our water supply and include, but are not limited to, liabilities associated with air, soil, or groundwater contamination in any real estate we own, including liabilities assumed in an acquisition of another utility. Environmental laws often impose liability regardless of whether the owner or operator knew of or was responsible for the presence of such substances. If hazardous substances are discovered in our real property, we could incur significant remediation costs, liability exposure or litigation expenses that could adversely affect our profitability, results of operations, liquidity and cash flows.
If the general public perceives recycled water to be unsafe, we will have difficulty executing our business plan and could face a loss of revenue.
Our Total Water Management model emphasizes the maximum use of recycled water for non-potable purposes. To implement this model, we cultivate relationships with developers, municipalities and members of the communities we serve and focus on educating them regarding the benefits and safety of recycled water. If


12


our water supply is contaminated, either as a result of terrorism, system failure, pipeline cross-connection or other causes, public perception regarding the safety of recycled water would likely suffer, regardless of whether we are at fault. For example, if groundwater contamination occurs as a result of discharge of “gray water” (e.g., used sink or laundry water) into the aquifer, the public could confuse that with recycled water and attribute environmental harm to our system. Public perception of an unsafe water supply would harm our business, particularly with respect to our ability to implement water recycling as a key element of our business strategy.
We have unregulated businesses with market and regulatory risks that could adversely affect our results of operations.
We engage in unregulated businesses that currently include the creation and resale of long-term water storage credits, the provision of back-office billing and laboratory services to third parties and meter sales. Revenues from our long-term storage credit business are subject to market forces and regulatory actions affecting the price of, and demand for, these credits. For example, if:
• regulatory or governmental authorities were to issue regulations or adopt policies reducing or eliminating requirements to replace water taken from the aquifer and centralize these replacement obligations or regulate the location of replacement facilities;
• the availability of Colorado River water that we use to create long-term storage credits were lost or reduced; or
• the regulatory ceiling price for resale of long-term storage credits were reduced,
then our revenues and profit margins for our long-term storage credit business would be reduced. The back-office billing and laboratory services we perform for third parties are subject to general business risks including liability for errors, increased personnel costs and diversion of our management’s time and attention from our core business.
Our unregulated activities may include water transmission activities in the future. Revenues for this line of business would be reduced in an environment of reduced demand, regulatory restrictions or increased pipeline construction costs.
Our business is subject to seasonal fluctuations and other weather conditions, which could adversely affect the supply of and demand for our services and our results of operations.
We depend on an adequate water supply to meet the present and future needs of our customers. Whether we have an adequate water supply depends upon a variety of factors, including:
• rainfall and snowpack;
• the capacity of, and the amount of water stored in, our reservoirs;
• underground water supply from which groundwater is pumped, and the rate at which it is recharged; and
• changes in the amount of water used by our customers.
In particular, the arid western U.S., which includes our present and potential service areas, has been required to deal with general conditions of water scarcity exacerbated by extended periods of drought. The Central Arizona Project (the “CAP”), which provides Colorado River water to Arizona, could experience a shortage as soon as 2012, assuming past conditions continue, and Arizona’s claim to Colorado River water through the CAP is junior in priority to California’s entire allocation.
Drought conditions could interfere with our sources of water supply and could adversely affect our ability to supply water in sufficient quantities to our existing and future customers. An interruption in our water supply or restrictions on water usage during drought conditions or other legal limitations on water use could


13


result in decreased customer billing and lower revenues that we would not be able to recoup without prior regulatory approval for a rate increase. These conditions could also lead to decreases in revenue from our stored water credit business or increases in capital expenditures needed to build infrastructure to secure alternative water sources. Furthermore, customers may use less water even after a drought has ended because of conservation patterns developed during the drought. Population growth could also decline under drought conditions as individuals and businesses move out of the area or elect not to relocate there. Lower water use for any reason, could lead to lower revenue.
Also, demand for water is seasonal. Demand for water varies with temperature and rainfall levels. In the event that temperatures during the typically warmer months are cooler than normal, or if there is more rainfall than normal, the demand for our water may decrease, which would adversely affect our profitability, results of operations, liquidity and cash flows.
We depend substantially on our Chief Executive Officer, who would be difficult to replace. If we lose his services, our business would be adversely affected.
Our continued growth and success depend in large part on the management and technical skills of the members of our senior management, particularly Trevor T. Hill, our Chief Executive Officer. Although Mr. Hill is subject to an employment agreement, he could terminate his employment with us at any time. Loss of his services would negatively affect our business by harming our ability to pursue our growth strategy and to continue to manage and oversee the improvement of our operations. See “Management.”
We rely on our information technology, or IT, systems to assist with the management of our business and customer relationships, and a disruption of these systems could adversely affect our business.
Our IT systems are an integral part of our business, and a serious disruption of our IT systems could significantly limit our ability to manage and operate our business efficiently, which in turn could cause our business to suffer and cause our results of operations to be reduced. We depend on our IT systems to bill customers, provide customer service, manage construction projects, manage our financial records, track assets, remotely control and monitor certain of our plants and facilities and manage human resources and accounts receivable collections. Our IT systems also allow us to bill customers on a timely basis, maintain cost-effective operations and provide service to our customers. Our IT systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from:
• power loss, computer systems failures and internet, telecommunications or data network failures;
• operator negligence or improper operation by, or supervision of, employees;
• physical and electronic loss of customer data or security breaches, misappropriation and similar events;
• computer viruses;
• intentional acts of vandalism and similar events; and
• fires, floods, earthquakes and other natural disasters.
Such damages or interruptions may result in physical and electronic loss of customer or financial data, security breaches, misappropriation and similar events. In addition, the lack of redundancy for certain of our IT systems, including billing systems, could exacerbate the impact on our company of any of the foregoing events. In addition, we may not be successful in developing or acquiring technology that is competitive and responsive to the needs of our business and we might lack sufficient resources to make the necessary investments in technology to allow us to continue to operate at our current level of efficiency.


14


We depend on an adequate supply of electricity and certain chemicals for the delivery of our water, and an interruption in the supply of these inputs or increases in their prices could adversely affect our results of operations.
We rely on purchased electrical power to operate the wells and pumps that are needed in order to supply potable and recycled water to our customers. An extended interruption in power supply that we cannot remediate through the use of backup generators could adversely affect our ability to continue these operations. In addition, we require bulk supplies of certain chemicals for water and wastewater treatment, and if we were to suffer an interruption of supply that we cannot replace quickly, we might not be able to perform these functions adequately.
Electrical power represents a significant and potentially volatile operating expense. During 2007, it represented approximately 6.1% of our total operating expenses. Although this expense is recoverable in rates, it is beyond our control and can increase unpredictably and in substantial amounts. Under these circumstances, our cash flows between our general rate case filings and our earnings may be adversely affected until the ACC can authorize a rate change.
those described below under “—Any disruption or problem at our facilities could increase our expenses.expenses,” either of these utilities are unable to service this service area, our ability to conduct our business would be adversely affected.

We face competition for new service areas and acquisition targets.

We take precautionsface competition from other water and wastewater utilities for new service areas and with respect to safeguardacquisition of smaller utilities. These competitors consist primarily of municipalities and investor-owned utilities seeking expansion opportunities. Some of our facilities, including obtainingcompetitors are larger than we are and have more resources and access to capital than we do. If we are unable to compete effectively for new service areas and acquisitions of existing utilities, our ability to increase our rate base and revenue could be adversely affected.

Operating costs, construction costs and costs of providing services may rise faster than revenue.

The ability to increase rates over time is dependent upon approval of rate increases by utility regulators, which may be inclined, for political or other reasons, to limit rate increases. However, our costs are subject to market conditions and other factors, and may increase significantly. The second largest component of our operating costs after water production is made up of salaries and wages. These costs are affected by the local supply and demand for qualified labor. Other large components of our costs are general insurance, maintainingworkers compensation insurance, employee benefits and health insurance costs. These costs may increase disproportionately to rate increases authorized by utility regulators and safety protocols, and using off-site storage of computer data. However,may have a natural disaster, such as an earthquake, fire or flood or an act of terrorism could cause substantial delays in our operations, damage or destroy our equipment or facilities and cause us to incur additional expenses. The insurance we maintain against natural disasters may not be adequate to cover our losses in any particular case, which would require us to expend significant resources to replace any destroyed assets, thereby harmingmaterial adverse effect on our financial condition and prospects significantly.

We are engaged in litigation that could adversely affect our results of operations if we are required to pay significant damages or our claims are ultimately unsuccessful.
Sonoran Litigation.  In June 2005, we acquired the assets used to operate certain utilities (the “387 Districts”) from Sonoran Utility Services, LLC (“Sonoran”) and assumed management responsibility for the 387 Districts’ water and wastewater services. In June 2007, Sonoran added Global Water Resources, LLC and its utility subsidiaries, Global Water-Santa Cruz Water Company and Global Water-Palo Verde Utilities Company, (the “Global Defendants”) as defendants to an action pending before the Maricopa County Arizona Superior Court (Case CV2006-018576).
Sonoran alleges contract and tort claims against the Global Defendants (as well as the other named defendants) leading up to and arising out of our purchase of the 387 Districts’ assets from Sonoran. Specifically, Sonoran claims the Global Defendants breached the implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing, intentionally interfered with contractual relations, and conspired to deprive Sonoran of its interests in the 387 Districts by making false and disparaging statements about Sonoran to landowners and urging landowners to procure water and wastewater services from our company in violation of the landowners’ contractual obligations with Sonoran, which ultimately led to the landowners and other named defendants breachingand/or terminating their contracts with Sonoran. Sonoran alleges that the combined effect of these actions forced them to sell their company to us. Further, Sonoran claims that the Global Defendants breached their contractual obligations under the purchase agreement with Sonoran by failing to make payments when such payments became due.
In the Sonoran litigation, the plaintiff is seeking unspecified damages, punitive damages, exemplary damages, attorneys’ fees and court costs, together with such other relief as the court deems proper. We do not believe our company is liable for these claims and intend to defend vigorously against them. If we do not prevail in this litigation and are ordered to pay significant damages, our results of operations will be adversely affected.


15

operations.


West Maricopa Combine Claim.  In addition, we have filed an indemnification claim against the former shareholders of West Maricopa Combine, Inc. (“WMC”), which we acquired pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement dated May 9, 2006 among Global Water, Inc. (“GWI”), WMC and the shareholders of WMC (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”). Our claim asserts $20.1 million in estimated losses arising out of what we claim to be materially inaccurate shareholder representations and warranties contained in the Stock Purchase Agreement. The representations and warranties are secured by our right of setoff against future annual growth premium payments that are required under the Stock Purchase Agreement and conclude on March 31, 2012. As a result, pending resolution of our indemnification claim, we will pay the required growth premium payments into escrow in accordance with the provisions of the Stock Purchase Agreement. We are unable to predict the likelihood or extent of recovery on our claim. If we do not recover on our claim, we will have expended management time and economic resources on its pursuit without a corresponding return.
Arizona Water Dispute.  Several of our CC&N extension requests are being contested by Arizona Water Company before the ACC. These extension requests are in various stages of administrative litigation. Arizona Water Company has also filed a formal complaint (the “Complaint”) with the ACC alleging that we and certain of our subsidiaries are improperly and illegally acting as public service companies, conducting business outside of the ACC’s regulatory authority and charging illegal and improper fees to customers within and contiguous to Arizona Water Company’s CC&N areas and systems. The Complaint also alleges that our public-private partnership agreements (“P3s”) are within Arizona Water Company’s service areas or contiguous to its CC&N and that our P3s and ICFAs are in violation of ACC practice and policy and Arizona law.
We are currently engaged in settlement discussions with Arizona Water Company regarding these matters and have reached a tentative agreement in principle. A definitive settlement agreement has not been signed, however, and even if a settlement is reached, it may not be approved by the ACC. If we do not reach a definitive settlement, or if the ACC does not approve our settlement, we could lose potential service area, which could adversely affect our profitability, results of operations, liquidity and cash flows. See “Business — Litigation.”
We may have difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified personnel.personnel, and due to the technical and specialized nature of our business, our profitability may suffer if we do not have the necessary workforce.

Our plants require some of our employees to be certified operators of record, a designation requiring specialized training and certification in water and wastewater systems. As workers with these qualifications retire in the industry, we may be unable to replace them readily in view of the relatively low number of younger workers that we believe are entering the workforce to pursue this line of work. Our operations require a variety of other technical skills and specialties in the areas of engineering, systems analysis, laboratory work and equipment repair, and we may have difficulty recruiting and retaining personnel with these skills. If we cannot maintain an employee base with the skills necessary to conduct our operations, our efficiency, margins and ability to expand our business could be adversely affected.

We face competition for newAny disruption or problem at our facilities could increase our expenses.

A natural disaster (such as an earthquake, fire or flood) or an act of terrorism could cause substantial delays in our operations, damage or destroy our equipment or facilities and cause us to incur additional expenses and lose revenue. The insurance we maintain against natural disasters may not be adequate to cover our losses in any particular case, which would require us to expend significant resources to replace any destroyed assets, thereby materially and adversely affecting our financial condition and prospects.

Our growth depends significantly on increased residential and commercial development in our service areas, and acquisition targetsif developers or builders are unable to complete additional residential and commercial projects, our revenue may not increase.

The growth of our customer base depends almost entirely on the success of developers in developing residential and commercial properties within our “Certificate of Convenience and Necessity” areas. A Certificate of Convenience and Necessity is a permit issued by the Arizona Corporation Commission allowing a public service corporation to serve a specified area, and preventing other public service corporations from offering the

same services within the specified area, which we refer to as well“service areas.” Real estate development is a cyclical industry and the growth rate of development, especially residential development, since 2006, both nationally and in Arizona has been below historical rates. The sale of, for instance, single family residences is affected by a number of national and regional economic factors, including:

interest rates and general levels of economic output;

levels of activity in the local real estate market;

the state of domestic credit markets, mortgage standards and availability of credit;

competition from other builders and other projects in the area and other states;

federal programs to assist home purchasers;

costs and availability of labor and materials;

government regulations affecting land development, homebuilding and mortgage financing;

availability of financing for development and for home purchasers;

changes in the income tax treatment of real property ownership;

unexpected increases in development costs;

increased commute times and fuel costs that may adversely affect the desirability of outlying suburbs;

availability of, among other things, other utilities, adequate transportation and school facilities; and

environmental problems with such land.

While many developers presently hold necessary zoning approvals, land development within our service areas could also be affected by changes in governmental policies, including, but not limited to, governmental policies to restrict or control development. This may include, for example, actions by the local school districts to restrict admissions to local schools because of inadequate classroom space or, because of other problems, such as competition in our unregulated business segments.

We do not face competitionfailure by local municipalities to approve plats for the provisiondevelopment. An increase in current residential foreclosure rates or a deep or prolonged slowdown of servicesthe development process and the related absorption rate within the various developments in our existing service areas because Arizona law provides us an exclusive rightof any or all of the foregoing could materially and adversely affect growth of our customer base and the generation of revenue.

Many national builders and developers in our service areas own or control substantial amounts of the developable land in these areas. There can be no assurance that these builders and developers have the financial capability to provide watercontinue and wastewater servicescomplete their developments. Moreover, given that there are limited restrictions on the ability of developers to sell parcels (or portions thereof), developers may continue to transfer ownership of parcels (or portions thereof) within our certificated service areas. We do, however, face competition from other water and wastewater utilities for new service areas to other developers and with respecthomebuilders and others prior to completion of development, who may then sell to, among others, ultimate homeowners. There can be no assurance that any subsequent owners will have the financial capabilities to complete development of any land so acquired.

A deep or prolonged slowdown of the development process and growth rate within the various developments in our service areas could materially and adversely affect the growth of our customer base.

Development in our service areas is also contingent upon construction or acquisition of smaller utilities. These competitors consist primarilymajor public improvements, such as arterial streets, drainage facilities, telephone and electrical facilities, recreational facilities, street lighting and local in-tract improvements (e.g., site grading). Many of investor-owned utilities seeking expansion opportunities. Some of our competitorsthese improvements are larger than we arebuilt by municipalities with public financing, and have moremunicipal resources and access to capital may not be sufficient to support development in areas of rapid population growth. If municipalities, developers, builders or homeowners are unable, financially or otherwise, to make the improvements necessary to complete new residential or commercial developments, our potential revenue growth from new water and wastewater connections within such developments would be reduced.

New or stricter regulatory standards or other governmental actions could increase our regulatory compliance and operating costs, which could cause our profitability to suffer, particularly if we are unable to increase our rates to offset such costs.

In Arizona, water and wastewater utilities are subject to regulation by water, environmental, public utility and health and safety regulators, and we are required to obtain environmental permits from governmental agencies in order to operate our facilities. Regulations relate to, among other things, standards and criteria for drinking water quality and for wastewater discharges, customer service and service delivery standards, waste disposal and raw groundwater abstraction limits and rates and charges for our regulated services. There may be instances in the future when we are not in or cannot achieve compliance with new and evolving laws, regulations and permits without incurring additional operating costs. For example, in 2006, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) implemented a new arsenic maximum contaminant level, which effectively required the installation and operation of costly arsenic treatment systems at many of our water production facilities.

Our costs of complying with current and future governmental laws and regulations could adversely affect our business or results of operations. If we fail to comply with these laws, regulations or permits, we could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by regulators and our operations could be curtailed or shut down. We may also be exposed to product liability or breach of contract claims by third parties resulting from our noncompliance. These laws and regulations are complex and change frequently, and these changes may cause us to incur costs in connection with the remediation of actions that were lawful when they were taken.

We may incur higher compliance or remediation costs than expected in any particular period and may not be able to pass those increased costs along to our customers immediately through rate increases or at all. This is because we do.must obtain regulatory approval to increase our rates, which can be time-consuming and costly and our requests for increases may not be approved in part or in full.

We are required to test our water quality for certain parameters and potential contaminants on a regular basis. If the test results indicate that parameters or contaminants exceed allowable limits, we may be required either to commence treatment to remedy the water quality or to develop an alternate water source. Either of these outcomes may be costly, and there can be no assurance that the regulatory authorities would approve rate increases to recover these additional compliance costs. In addition, by the time that test results are available, contaminated water may have been provided to customers, which may result in liability for us and damage our reputation.

In addition, governments or government agencies that regulate our operations may enact legislation or adopt new requirements that could have an adverse effect on our business, including:

restricting ownership or investment;

providing for the expropriation of our assets by the government through condemnation or similar proceedings;

providing for changes to water and wastewater quality standards;

requiring cancellation or renegotiation of, or unilateral changes to, agreements relating to our provision of water and wastewater services;

changing regulatory or legislative emphasis on water conservation in comparison to other goals and initiatives;

promoting an increase of competition among water companies within our designated service areas;

requiring the provision of water or wastewater services at no charge or at reduced prices;

restricting the ability to terminate services to customers whose accounts are in arrears;

restricting the ability to sell assets or issue securities;

adversely changing tax, legal or regulatory requirements, including environmental requirements and the imposition of additional requirements and costs on our operations, including but not limited to changes adopted in response to regulatory measures to address global climate change;

changes in the charges applied to raw water abstraction;

changes in rate making policies; or

restrictions relating to water use and supply, including restrictions on use, increased offsetting groundwater replenishment obligations, changes to the character of groundwater rights and settlement of Native American claims.

We may not be permitted to increase our rates, which may necessitate a reduction of our capital investments and operating costs.

Our utility subsidiaries are regulated as public service corporations by the Arizona Corporation Commission. Our utility subsidiaries file general rate cases for rates they charge for services which are established by the Arizona Corporation Commission in accordance with Arizona law, which grants considerable discretion to the Arizona Corporation Commission. If requested rate increases are not allowed, we may have to reduce our costs of capital and operating costs. The members of the Arizona Corporation Commission are selected by the voters in statewide elections and are often responsive to complaints by ratepayers about proposed rate increases. Moreover, even if the Arizona Corporation Commission ultimately agrees that some rate relief is necessary, the relief can only be obtained after a formal and lengthy proceeding before the Arizona Corporation Commission. There can be no assurance that rate increases we request would be approved by the Arizona Corporation Commission.

The operations of our utility subsidiaries are subject to other various federal, state and local laws, regulations and ordinances, including without limitation, the jurisdiction of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Arizona Department of Water Resources, City of Maricopa, Arizona, City of Casa Grande, Arizona, Maricopa, Pinal and Mohave Counties, EPA, the Maricopa Association of Governments and the Central Arizona Association of Governments. Existing laws, regulations and ordinances can be amended, or new laws, regulations or ordinances may be enacted, and the requirements of compliance may change. Continued benefits we receive under existing laws can be withdrawn or become unavailable or more costly. In addition, enforcement practice may become more stringent. As a result, governmental regulatory action and changes in law could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations if we face delays and difficulties in obtaining approval to raise rates, and if there is a significant gap between the timing of increased expenses and our ability to recover those expenses, or if we are unable to obtain approval to recover expenses, our profitability, results of operations, liquidity and cash flows would be adversely affected.

Changes to environmental and other regulation may require us to alter our existing treatment facilities or build additional facilities.

To comply with federal, state and local environmental laws, our existing facilities may need to be altered or replaced. Altered and new facilities and other capital improvements must be constructed and operated in accordance with multiple requirements, including, in certain cases, an Aquifer Protection Permit issued by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, Arizona Pollution Discharge Elimination System permits from the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and an air quality permit from Maricopa or Pinal Counties. The provision of potable water is subject to, among others, the requirements of the federal Safe Drinking Water Act, and effluent from wastewater treatment facilities must comply with other requirements. Regulated contaminants and associated maximum contaminant levels may change over time, requiring us to alter or build additional treatment facilities. We are also subject to regulation as an employer, property owner and business operator in the State of Arizona. Failure by us to observe the conditions and comply with the requirements of these permits and other applicable laws and regulations could result in delays, additional costs, fines and other adverse consequences up to and including inability to proceed with development in our service areas.

We are subject to environmental risks that may subject us to clean-up costs or litigation that could adversely affect our business, operating results, financial condition and prospects.

Under various federal and state environmental laws, regulations, ordinances and other requirements, a current or previous owner or operator of real property or a facility may be liable for the costs of removal, remediation or containment of hazardous or toxic substances on, under, in or released from such property. These liabilities are not limited to a potential effect on our water supply and include, but are not limited to, liabilities associated with air, soil, or groundwater contamination at any real estate or facilities we own or operate, including liabilities assumed in an acquisition of another utility. Environmental laws often impose liability regardless of whether the owner or operator knew of or was responsible for the presence of the hazardous or toxic substances. Although we currently conduct environmental screening assessments on new properties that we propose to acquire or use to identify significant sources of contaminants on surrounding properties, these assessments are not comprehensive, nor have they been conducted for all of the property owned or used by us. As a result, hazardous or toxic substances may exist at properties owned or used by us. If hazardous or toxic substances are discovered at real property or facilities owned or used by us (including a landfill owned by another party that is used by us for disposal of hazardous substances), we could incur significant remediation costs, liability exposure or litigation expenses that could adversely affect our profitability, results of operations, liquidity and cash flows.

Any failure of our network of water and wastewater pipes and water reservoirs could result in losses and damages that may affect our financial condition and reputation.

Our utilities distribute water and collect wastewater through an extensive network of pipes and store water in reservoirs located across our service areas. A failure of major pipes or reservoirs could result in injuries and property damage for which we may be liable. The failure of major pipes and reservoirs may also result in the need to shut down some facilities or parts of our network in order to conduct repairs. Any failures and shutdowns may limit our ability to supply water in sufficient quantities to customers and to meet the water and wastewater delivery requirements prescribed by applicable utility regulators, which would adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity and reputation.

We rely on information technology systems to assist with the management of our business and customer relationships. A disruption of these systems could adversely affect our business and operations.

Our information technology systems and the information technology functions that are outsourced to the FATHOMTM business, which we previously owned, are an integral part of our business. For example, FATHOMTM systems allow us to read water meters remotely, identify high water usage and identify water theft from disconnected meters. FATHOMTM systems also provide contracted services and back-office technologies and systems to bill our customers, provide customer service, manage certain financial records and track assets and accounts receivable collections. A disruption of our information technology systems or the FATHOMTM systems could significantly limit our ability to manage and operate our business efficiently, which in turn could cause our business to suffer and cause our results of operations to be reduced.

Further, our information technology systems and the FATHOMTM systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from:

power loss, computer systems failures and internet, telecommunications or data network failures;

operator negligence or improper operation by, or supervision of, employees;

physical and electronic loss of customer data or security breaches, misappropriation and similar events;

computer viruses;

intentional acts of vandalism and similar events; and

fires, floods, earthquakes and other natural disasters.

Damages or interruptions to our information technology systems or the FATHOMTM systems may result in physical and electronic loss of customer or financial data, security breaches, misappropriation and similar events. These issues could prevent us from issuing billings timely, which could impact revenue, or could negatively impact the efficient operations of the business, resulting in additional costs. The lack of redundancy for some of our IT systems or the FATHOMTM systems, including billing systems, could exacerbate the impact of any of the foregoing events.

Our utilities business is subject to seasonal fluctuations and other weather-related conditions, such as droughts, which could adversely affect the supply of and demand for our services and our results of operations.

We depend on an adequate water supply to meet the present and future needs of our customers. Whether we have an adequate water supply depends upon a variety of factors, including underground water supply from which groundwater is pumped, the rate at which it is recharged by rainfall and snowpack and changes in the amount of water used by our customers. In particular, the arid western U.S. region, which includes our present and potential service areas, has been required to deal with general conditions of water scarcity exacerbated by extended periods of drought.

Drought conditions could interfere with our sources of water supply and could adversely affect our ability to supply water in sufficient quantities to our existing and future customers. For example, our utilities have acted in the past as interim operators for several smaller troubled water systems, at the request of the Arizona Corporation Commission. In one such instance, the onsite well, which was the single source of water, ran dry due to aquifer decline. As a result, we were forced to haul water to the system for several years at a considerable cost. Any future interruption to our water supply or restrictions on water usage during drought conditions or other legal limitations on water use could result in decreased customer billing and lower revenues or higher expenses that we would not be able to recoup without prior regulatory approval for a rate increase, which may not be granted. See “—We may not be permitted to increase our rates, which may necessitate a reduction of our capital investments and operating costs.” These conditions could also lead to increases in capital expenditures needed to build infrastructure to secure alternative water sources. Furthermore, customers may use less water even after a drought has ended because of conservation patterns developed during the drought. Population growth could also decline under drought conditions as individuals and businesses move out of the area or elect not to relocate there. Lower water use for any reason could lead to lower revenue.

Demand for water is seasonal and varies with temperature and rainfall levels. If temperatures during the typically warmer months are cooler than normal, or if there is more rainfall than normal, the demand for our water may decrease, which would adversely affect our profitability, results of operations, liquidity and cash flows. Consequently, the results of operations for one quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for future quarters or the full year.

Funds from our infrastructure coordination and financing agreements are dependent on development activities by developers which we do not control and are also subject to certain regulatory requirements.

In the past, we extended water and wastewater infrastructure financing to developers and builders through infrastructure coordination and financing agreements. These agreements are contracts with developers or builders in which we coordinate and fund the construction of water, wastewater and recycled water facilities that will be owned and operated by our regulated subsidiaries in advance of completion of developments in the area. Our investment can be considerable, as we phase-in the construction of facilities in accordance with a regional master plan, as opposed to a single development. Developers and builders pay us agreed-upon fees upon the occurrence of specified development events for their development projects. The Arizona Corporation Commission requires us to record a portion of the funds we receive under infrastructure coordination and financing agreements as “contributions in aid of construction,” which are funds or property provided to a utility under the terms of a collection main extension agreement and/or service connection tariff, the value of which are not refundable. Amounts received as contributions in aid of construction reduce our rate base once expended on utility plants.

The developer is not required to pay the bulk of the agreed-upon fees until a development receives platting approval. Accordingly, we cannot always accurately predict or control the timing of the collection of our fees. If a developer encounters difficulties, such as during a real estate market downturn, that result in a complete or partial abandonment of the development or a significant delay in its completion, we will have planned, built and invested in infrastructure that will not be supported by development and will not generate either payments under the applicable infrastructure coordination and financing agreement or cash flows from providing services. As a result, our return on our investment and cash flow stream could be adversely affected.

In August 2013, we entered into a settlement agreement with Arizona Corporation Commission staff, the Residential Utility Consumers Office, the City of Maricopa and other the parties to a rate case, which established the policy by which infrastructure coordination and financing agreement fees will be treated going forward. The settlement also prohibits us from entering into new infrastructure coordination and financing agreements. In February 2014, the rate case proceedings were completed and the Arizona Corporation Commission issued Rate Decision No. 74364, approving the settlement agreement. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Rate Case Activity” for additional information.

Risks associated with the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater and the operation of water utilities may impose significant costs that may not be covered by insurance, which could result in increased insurance premiums.

The wastewater collection, treatment and disposal operations of our utilities are subject to substantial regulation and involve significant environmental risks. If collection or sewage systems fail, overflow or do not operate properly, untreated wastewater or other contaminants could spill onto nearby properties or into nearby streams and rivers, potentially causing damage to persons or property, injury to the environment including aquatic life and economic damages, which may not be recoverable in rates. This risk is most acute during periods of substantial rainfall or flooding, which are the main causes of sewer overflow and system failure. Liabilities resulting from such damage could adversely and materially affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, in the event that we are deemed liable for any damage caused by overflow, losses might not be covered by insurance policies, and such losses may make it difficult to secure insurance in the future at acceptable insurance premium rates. Similarly, any related business interruption or other losses might not be covered by insurance policies, which would also make it difficult for us to secure insurance in the future at acceptable insurance premium rates.

We may also incur liabilities under environmental laws and regulations requiring investigations and cleanup of environmental contamination at our properties or at off-site locations where there have been adverse environmental impacts. The discovery of previously unknown conditions, or the imposition of cleanup obligations in the future, could result in significant costs, and could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and liquidity. Such remediation losses may not be covered by insurance policies and may make it difficult for us to secure insurance in the future at acceptable insurance premium rates.

Inadequate water and wastewater supplies could have a material adverse effect upon our ability to achieve the customer growth necessary to increase our revenues.

In many areas of Arizona (including certain areas that we service), water supplies are limited and, in some cases, current usage rates exceed sustainable levels for certain water resources. As discussed above, we currently rely predominantly (and are likely to continue to rely) on the pumping of groundwater and the generation and delivery of recycled water for non-potable uses to meet future demands in our service areas. At present, groundwater (and recycled water derived from groundwater) is the primary water supply available to us.

We do not currently anticipate any short-term concerns with physical, legal, or continuous availability issues in our service areas. Regardless, the supply of groundwater in Central Arizona, while considerable, is also ultimately finite, closely regulated and geographically limited. In areas where we have not applied for a “Designation of Assured Water Supply,” which is a decision and order issued by the director of the Arizona

Department of Water Resources designating a private water company provider as having an adequate water supply, we have not performed hydrological studies or modeling to evaluate the amount of groundwater likely to be available to meet present and expected future demands. Insofar as we intend to rely on the pumping of groundwater and the generation and delivery of recycled water to meet future demands in our current service areas, our ability and/or the ability of developers inside of our service areas to meet regulatory requirements and to demonstrate assured and adequate water supplies is essential to the continued growth of our service connections and our capacity to supply water to our customers.

Insufficient availability of water or wastewater treatment capacity could materially and adversely affect our ability to provide for expected customer growth necessary to increase revenues. We continuously look for new sources of water to augment our reserves in our service areas, but have not yet obtained surface water rights. Our ability to obtain such rights may depend on factors beyond our control, such as the future availability of Colorado River water supplies. We also face general commercial risksplan to construct facilities and obtain the necessary permits to recharge recycled water to stretch and augment our existing and planned future water supplies, but do not yet have this capability in all of our unregulated businesses, such as price-based competitionservice areas. As a result, it is possible that, in the future, we will not be able to obtain sufficient water or water supplies to increase customer growth necessary to increase or even maintain our revenues.

There is no guaranteed source of water.

Our ability to meet the existing and future water demands of our customers depends on an adequate supply of water. Regulatory restrictions on the use of groundwater and the development of groundwater wells, lack of available water rights, drought, overuse of local or regional sources of water, protection of threatened species or habitats or other factors, including climate change, may limit the availability of ground or surface water.

As stated above, our primary source of water is pumping of groundwater from utilitiesaquifers within service areas. In the event that our wells cannot meet customer demand, we can purchase water from surrounding municipalities, agencies and other service providers inutilities. However, the cost of purchasing water is typically more expensive than producing it. Furthermore, these alternative sources may not always have an adequate supply to sell to us.

To date, we have been able to produce enough water to meet current customer requirements. However, no assurance can be given that we will be able to produce or purchase enough water to fully satisfy future customer demand. We can make no guarantee that we will always have access to an adequate supply of water that will meet all quality standards, or that the cost of water will not adversely affect our stored water credit and back-office and laboratory service businesses and competition from other sources of financing with respect to our ICFAs. operating results.

If we are unable to compete effectively, our abilityaccess adequate water supplies, we may be unable to satisfy all customer demand, which could result in rationing. Rationing may have an adverse effect on cash flow from operations.

Water shortages may affect us in a variety of ways. For example, water shortages could:

adversely affect water supply mix by causing us to rely on more expensive purchased water;

adversely affect operating costs;

increase our rate basethe risk of contamination to water systems due to the inability to maintain sufficient pressure;

increase capital expenditures for building pipelines to connect to alternative sources of supply, new wells to replace those that are no longer in service or are otherwise inadequate to meet the needs of customers and revenue couldreservoirs and other facilities to conserve or reclaim water; and

result in regulatory authorities refusing to approve new service areas if an adequate water supply cannot be adversely affected. See “Business—Competition.”demonstrated, and restrictions on new customer connections may be imposed in existing service areas if there is not sufficient water.


16


We may or may not be able to continuerecover increased operating and construction costs as a result of water shortages on a timely basis, or at all, for our regulated systems through the rate setting process.

The nature of our business exposes us to various liability claims, which may exceed the level of our insurance coverage and thereby not be reimbursed fully by insurance proceeds, or not be covered by our insurance at all, and may also make it difficult for us to obtain appropriate liability or workers’ compensation insurance coverage at a reasonable cost.affordable rates.

Our systems are subject to the normal risks of operation as well as the additional risks of receiving, processing, treating and disposing of waste materials.

In recent years, societal factors have resulted in increased litigation and escalating monetary claims against industries and employers. As a safeguard, we maintain general liability and workers’ compensationAlthough the national insurance coverages. Theremarket currently provides insurance coverage at affordable premiums, there is no guarantee that insurancethis will continue to be available at affordable premiums or that we will continue to be able to obtain coverage against catastrophic claims and losses. While we may self-insure for some risks in the future, should an uninsured or underinsured loss occur, we may be unable to meet our obligations as they become due.

The operation of our utilities is subject to the normal risks of occupancy as well as the additional risks of receiving, processing, treating and disposing of water and waste materials. As a safeguard, we currently maintain general liability and workers’ compensation insurance coverage, subject to deductibles at levels we believe are sufficient to cover future claims made during the respective policy periods. However, we may be exposed to multiple claims, including workers compensation claims, that do not exceed our deductibles, and, as a result, we could incur significant out-of-pocket costs that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the cost of insurance policies may increase significantly upon renewal of those policies as a result of general rate increases for the type of insurance we carry as well as our historical experience and experience in our industry. Our future claims may exceed the coverage level of our insurance, and insurance may not continue to be available on economically reasonable terms, or at all. If we are required to pay significantly higher premiums for insurance, are not able to maintain insurance coverage at affordable rates or if we must pay amounts in excess of claims covered by our insurance, we could experience higher costs that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

InflationContamination of the water supplied by us may result in disruption in our services, loss of credibility, lower demand for our services and potential liability that could adversely affect our profitability.business and financial condition.

Our profitability dependswater supplies are subject to contamination, including contamination from compounds, chemicals in partgroundwater systems, pollution resulting from man-made sources (such as perchlorate and methyl tertiary butyl ether), and possible biological terrorist attacks. Contamination of water sources can lead to human death and illness, damage to natural resources and other parts of the environment and cause other harms. Among other things, if we are found to be liable for consequences of water contamination arising out of human exposure to hazardous substances in our water supplies or other damage, we would be subject to civil or criminal enforcement actions, litigation and other proceedings or clean up obligations. Further, our insurance policies may not apply or be sufficient to cover the costs of these claims, which could be significant.

Cleaning up water sources can be very expensive and if we are required to do so, it could have a material and adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. In the pricesevent that our water supply is contaminated, we must pay formay have to interrupt or stop the electricity, materials and servicesuse of that water supply until we needare able to treat the water or to substitute the supply of water from another water source, including, in some cases, through the purchase of water from a supplier. We may incur significant costs in order to conductwarn consumers and to treat the contaminated source through expansion of current treatment facilities or development of new treatment methods. Using a new water source is generally associated with increased costs compared to an existing water source and, as indicated above, purchasing water is typically more expensive than obtaining the water from other means. If we are unable to treat or substitute our water supply in a cost-effective manner, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flow, liquidity and reputation may be adversely affected. We may not be able to recover costs associated with treating contaminated water or developing new sources of supply through the rate setting process or through insurance.

We depend on an adequate supply of electricity and chemicals for the delivery of our water, and an interruption in the supply of these inputs or increases in their prices could adversely affect our results of operations.

We rely on purchased electrical power to operate the wells and pumps that are needed in order to supply potable and recycled water to our customers. An extended interruption in power supply that we cannot remediate through the use of backup generators could adversely affect our ability to continue these operations. Electrical power, which represented approximately 6.8% of our total operating expenses in fiscal year 2014 (excluding a one-time gain on regulatory order), is a significant and potentially volatile operating expense. Electrical power costs are beyond our control and can increase unpredictably in substantial amounts. Under these circumstances, our cash flows between our general rate case filings and our earnings may be adversely affected until the Arizona Corporation Commission has authorized a rate increase.

In addition, we require bulk supplies of chemicals for water and wastewater treatment, and if we were to suffer an interruption of supply that we cannot replace quickly, we might not be able to perform these functions adequately. Some chemicals are available from a single source or a limited number of sources. Chemical costs represented approximately 2.1% of our total operating expenses in fiscal year 2014 (excluding a one-time gain on regulatory order).

Doing business in jurisdictions other than Arizona may present unforeseen regulatory, legal and operational challenges that could impede or delay our operations or adversely affect our profitability.

We may decide to pursue growth opportunities in states other than Arizona. Other states may present substantially different regulatory frameworks, and we may have difficulty acquiring the necessary approvals and permits or complying with environmental, health and safety or quality standards. In addition, it may become more costly or difficult for us to comply with a multitude of standards and requirements across multiple states.

Other states may also expose us to new legal precedents, condemnation risks and liability concerns based on state legislation or case law.

Our cost structure in other states may be significantly different than our current cost structure due to regional differences. For example, our cost structure may be significantly impacted by differences in labor and energy costs in other markets and the significant portion of overall production costs that they represent.

If future acquisitions do not achieve sufficient profitability relative to expenses and investment, our business and ability to finance our operations could be materially adversely affected.

A typical element of a utility growth strategy is the acquisition or development of other water and wastewater utilities. The potential negotiation of future acquisitions and development of new projects could require us to incur significant costs and expose us to significant risks, including:

risks relating to the condition of assets acquired and exposure to residual liabilities of prior businesses;

operating risks, including equipment, technology and supply problems, regulatory requirements and approvals necessary for acquisitions;

risks that potential acquisitions may require the disproportionate attention of our senior management, which could distract them from the management of our existing business;

risks related to our ability to retain experienced personnel of the acquired company; and

risks that certain acquisitions may require regulatory approvals, which could be refused or delayed and which could result in unforeseen regulatory expenses or unfavorable regulatory conditions.

These issues could have a material adverse effect on our business and our ability to finance our operations. The businesses and other assets we acquire in the future may not achieve sufficient revenue or profitability to justify our investment, and any difficulties we may encounter in the integration process could interfere with our

operations and reduce operating margins. Acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuance of our equity securities, incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities and fluctuations in quarterly results and expenses.

We are exposed to various risks relating to legal proceedings or claims that could materially adversely affect our operating results.

We are a party to lawsuits in the normal course of our business. Litigation in general can be expensive, lengthy and disruptive to normal business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. Responding to lawsuits brought against us, or legal actions that we may initiate, can often be expensive and time-consuming. Unfavorable outcomes from these claims and/or lawsuits could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition, and we could incur substantial monetary liability and/or be required to change our business practices.

We are subject to industrial risks that could adversely affect our results of operations.

The operations of our water and wastewater treatment plants involve physical, chemical and biological processes and the use of pumps, generators and other industrial equipment. As a result, our operations are subject to various industrial risks, including chemical spills, discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases, effects resulting from confined operating spaces, fires, explosions, mechanical failures, storage tank leaks and electric shock. These risks can result in personal injury, loss of life, catastrophic damage to or destruction of property and equipment or environmental damage and related legal proceedings, including those commenced by regulators, neighbors or others. They may also result in an unanticipated interruption or suspension of our operations and the imposition of liability. The loss or shutdown over an extended period of operations at any of our treatment facilities or any losses relating to these risks could have a material adverse impact on our profitability, results of operations, liquidity and cash flows.

If inflation increasesthe general public perceives recycled water to be unsafe, we will have difficulty executing our business plan and could face a loss of revenue.

Our Total Water Management model emphasizes the maximum use of recycled water for non-potable purposes. To implement this model, we cultivate relationships with developers, municipalities and members of the communities we serve and focus on educating them regarding the benefits and safety of recycled water. If the recycled water supplied to customers is contaminated, either as a result of terrorism, system failure, pipeline or other causes, public perception regarding the safety of recycled water would likely suffer, regardless of whether we are at fault and potentially even if the contaminated water was supplied by another person. For example, if groundwater contamination occurs as a result of discharge of “gray water” (e.g., used sink or laundry water) into the aquifer, the public could confuse that with recycled water and attribute environmental harm to our system. Public perception of an unsafe water supply would harm our business, particularly with respect to our ability to implement water recycling as a key element of our business strategy.

We face risks associated with the design, construction and operation of our systems that may adversely affect our business and financial condition.

We are responsible for the design, construction, installation and maintenance of our water treatment, reclamation and distribution systems. We could be adversely affected by a failure to complete our construction projects on time or on budget, and a substantial delay in the progress of construction due to adverse weather, work stoppages, shortages of materials, non-issuances of permits, nonperformance of suppliers or contractors or other factors could result in a material increase in the overall cost of such projects.

We cannot guarantee that our systems will operate as designed or be free from defects. The failure of our systems to operate properly could cause significant public harm. Any defects in our systems or significant reliability, quality or performance problems with respect to our systems or services could have a number of negative effects on our profitability, results of operations, liquidity and cash flows, including:

loss of revenues;

diversion of management and development resources and the attention of engineering personnel;

significant customer relations problems;

increased repair, support and insurance expenses;

adverse regulatory actions; and

legal actions for damages by our customers, including but not limited to damages based on commercial losses and effects on human health.

Our water and wastewater systems are subject to condemnation by governmental authorities, which may result in the receipt of less than the fair market value of our assets and a loss of revenue from our operation.

Arizona law provides for the acquisition of public utility property by governmental agencies through their power of eminent domain, also known as condemnation. Should a municipality or other government subdivision seek to acquire our assets through eminent domain, we may resist the acquisition. Contesting an exercise of condemnation through eminent domain may result in costly legal proceedings and may divert the attention of management.

The assets of our former utility subsidiaries, Cave Creek Water Co. and Valencia Water Company, were acquired from us by municipalities pursuant to condemnation proceedings, and our other utility subsidiaries could be subjects of such proceedings in the future. The fair market value we receive for the assets condemned may not always exceed their book value. Condemnation also results in a loss of revenue from the operations of the affected utility in addition to increased legal costs and diversion of management resources.

On July 14, 2015, we closed the stipulated condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company with the City of Buckeye, Arizona. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Events—Stipulated Condemnation of the Operations and Assets of Valencia Water Company” for additional information.

If we do not manage our anticipated growth effectively, we may not be able to develop or implement the infrastructure necessary to support our operations and could suffer a loss of profitability.

Since our formation in 2003, we have grown rapidly, with our total revenues increasing from $4.9 million in 2004 to $32.6 million in 2014, and total service connections increasing from 8,113 as of December 31, 2004 to 38,620 as of September 30, 2015. We have also expanded geographically, from 18 square miles of service areas in 2004 to 332 square miles as of the date of this prospectus. Our growth has been driven principally by acquisitions and by organic growth resulting from increased development and service connections within our existing service areas.

Although we may not be able to achieve similar growth or grow at all, in future periods, we expect to continue to significantly expand our facilities, infrastructure, research and development, marketing, testing, management and administrative operations, as well as our financial and accounting controls. This expansion has placed, and will continue to place, strain on our management and administrative, operational, technical and financial infrastructure. If management is unable to manage growth effectively, the quality of our services, our ability to attract and retain key personnel, and our business or prospects could be harmed significantly.

To manage growth effectively, we must:

continue to expand our water management capacity;

retain key management and augment our management team;

continue to enhance our technology, operations and financial and management systems;

manage multiple relationships with our customers, regulators, suppliers and other third parties; and

expand, train and manage our employee base.

We may not be able to manage effectively any expansion in one or more of these pricesareas, and our failure to do so could harm our ability to maintain or increase revenues and operating results. The expenses incurred in pursuing growth could increase without a corresponding increase in our revenue base, which could decrease operating results and profit margin. In addition, future growth may require us to make significant capital expenditures or incur other significant expenses and may divert the attention of our personnel from our core business operations, any of which could affect our financial performance adversely.

Our ability to expand into new service areas and to expand current water and wastewater service depends on approval from regulatory agencies. Failure to obtain required regulatory approvals will adversely affect future growth.

In Arizona, the Arizona Corporation Commission is the regulatory authority that oversees the formation, expansion and ongoing operations of water and wastewater utilities. The Arizona Corporation Commission has authority, among other things, to determine service areas for utility providers. In order for our owned utilities to provide water or wastewater service, they must obtain a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for a service area before they can service that area. In addition, our owned utilities and/or the developments that we serve must demonstrate to the Arizona Department of Water Resources that there exists a 100-year water supply and obtain either a “Certificate of Assured Water Supply,” which is a certificate issued by the Arizona Department of Water Resources evidencing sufficient groundwater, surface water or effluent of adequate quality will be continuously available to satisfy the water needs of the proposed use for at least one hundred years and which applies to a specific subdivision, or a Designation of Assured Water Supply, which applies to the utility’s entire service area. The designation area is contiguous with the Certificate of Convenience and Necessity. Further, our wastewater facilities require Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and/or EPA permits that regulate, among other things, the level of discharges from our facilities, the size of our facilities and the location of our facilities. Any inability to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals, assured water supplies or environmental permits would limit our ability to expand our water or wastewater service areas.

If we chose to expand to states other than Arizona, we may have difficulty acquiring the necessary approvals and permits or complying with environmental, health and safety or quality standards of such states. See “—Doing business in jurisdictions other than Arizona may present unforeseen regulatory, legal and operational challenges that could impede or delay our operations or adversely affect our profitability.”

We do not control when and where a developer may request service within our service areas, and if this occurs outside the location and capacity of existing infrastructure, it may require significantly more capital expenditures than currently anticipated.

If a developer has an infrastructure coordination and financing agreement, and/or once a developer has entered into a service agreement with our utility subsidiary and the property being developed has been included within a service area, the utility has the obligation to serve under the terms of those agreements and existing regulations. Although we will experience an increasehave built substantial modern infrastructure within these utilities in areas where development is currently occurring, there is the potential that a developer may request service in another location within the service area. Extending/expanding the existing infrastructure to provide service may result in the need to make additional, currently unplanned, capital improvements and there is no guarantee that we may recover our operating costs that may nottimely. As a result, our return on our investment and cash flow stream could be immediately and fully recoverable in our rates.

Risks Related to our Finances and Capital Requirements
adversely affected.

We will need additional capital to grow our business, and additional financing may not be available to us on favorable terms when required, or at all.

We expect that our current sources of liquidity, together with the anticipated net proceeds of this offering, will be sufficient to fund our anticipated future growth and operations for approximately 12 months following the completion of this offering. We anticipate that we will need additional capital to finance our growth after such12-month period or to accelerate our expected growth during such12-month period. We have based this estimate of our liquidity needs on assumptions that may prove to be incorrect, and we may spend our available financial resources more rapidly than we currently anticipate.

Adequate funds to support our growth may not be available when needed or on terms acceptable to us. We also may need to raise additional funds to support more rapid expansion, improve our facilities and infrastructure, develop new and enhanced technologies or respond to evolving regulatory standards. If we raise funds by issuing additional common stock, other equity securities or indebtedness, the percentage ownership of our then-current stockholders may be diluted substantially and the equity or debt securities issued to new investors may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of our then-existing capital stock. We may also experience difficulty in raising the necessary capital in view of the recentdue to volatility in the capital markets andor increases in the cost of infrastructure finance, and increasinglyfinance. Increasingly stringent bond rating standards could make it more difficult for us to finance

our growth by issuing tax-exempt bonds as we have in the past. In addition, we require regulatory approval from the Arizona Corporation Commission for some means of raising capital, such as issuance of debt by our regulated utilities, and approval may be denied or delayed. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to take advantage of expansion opportunities, make the capital expenditures necessary to support our growth or otherwise execute our strategic plan.

Increased operating expenses associated with the expansion of our business may negatively impact our operating income.

Increased operating expenses associated with any expansion of our business may negatively impact our income as we, among other things:

• seek to acquire new service areas;
• expand geographically in and outside of Arizona;
• make significant capital expenditures to support our ability to provide services in our existing service areas;
• fund development costs for our system and technology; and


17


seek to acquire new service areas;

expand geographically in and outside of Arizona;

make significant capital expenditures to support our ability to provide services in our existing service areas;

fund development costs for our system and technology; and
• incur increased general and administrative expenses as our company grows, including increased costs as a result of becoming a public company upon completion of this offering.

incur increased general and administrative expenses as we grow.

As a result of these and other factors, we may not sustain or increase our profitability on an ongoing basis.

Our existing indebtedness could affect our business adversely and limit our ability to plan for or respond to growth opportunities, and we may be unable to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our liquidity needs.

As of December 31, 2007,September 30, 2015, we had total indebtedness of $128.3$108.4 million, under our revolving credit facility and other loans and our Series 2006 and 2007 tax-exempt bonds. We intend to increase our borrowings under our revolving credit facility to financenet of debt reserve funds. Following the redemption of outstanding preferred limited liability company interests as described in “The Reorganization” and to repay all indebtedness under our revolving credit facility with the proceedsconsummation of this offering which will leave us with approximately $      million of outstanding indebtedness immediately after completion of this offering. and the Reorganization Transaction, we plan to refinance our existing indebtedness. See “The Transactions—Planned Refinancing Transaction” and “—We may however,not be able to refinance our indebtedness on favorable terms or at all.” In addition, we may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future.

Our indebtedness could have important consequences, including:

limiting our ability to obtain future additional financing we may need to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other corporate requirements; and

limiting, by the financial and other restrictive covenants in our debt agreements, our ability to borrow additional funds and to pay dividends.
• limiting our ability to obtain future additional financing we may need to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other corporate requirements; and
• limiting, by the financial and other restrictive covenants in our debt agreements, our ability to borrow additional funds.

Our ability to incur significant future indebtedness will depend in part on our ability to generate cash flow. This ability is affected by general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. If our business does not generate sufficient cash flow from operations or if we are unable to borrow money or otherwise generate funds sufficient to enable us to fund our liquidity needs, we may be unable to plan for or respond to growth opportunities, which could adversely affect our operating results and business prospects.

OurWe may not be able to refinance our indebtedness places restrictions on favorable terms or at all.

Following the operation of our business, and our failure to comply with its terms could put us in default.

Upon completionconsummation of this offering and the Reorganization Transaction, we will be subjectplan to indebtedness underrefinance all of our Series 2006 and 2007 tax-exempt bonds and will have our revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. available for future borrowings. Under the terms of these bonds and our revolving credit facility, we are subject to a number of significant covenants. These covenants limit our ability to, among other things, do the following:
• incur other indebtedness and guaranties;
• merge or consolidate with, or transfer all or a material portion of our assets to, another entity;
• make certain loans or investments; and
• encumber our assets.
In addition, we are subject to a variety of financial covenants, including requirements to maintain:
• a minimum net worth;
• a minimum ratio of annualized recurring earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) to annualized interest expense plus current maturities of long-term indebtedness;
• a maximum ratio of total senior funded debt to annualized recurring EBITDA; and
• a minimum ratio of income available for Bond service to maximum annual debt service.
A material breach of any of these covenants would result in a default, and our revolving credit facility and the loan agreement relating to our Series 2006 and 2007 tax-exempt bonds are cross-defaulted to one


18


another. Upon the occurrence of any default under the revolving credit agreement that is not cured within any applicable grace or cure period, the revolving credit lender could suspend funding, terminate its loan commitment, accelerate the outstanding obligations under the credit facility and exercise any of its other available rights and remedies. Upon the occurrence of any default under the bond loan agreements, the trustee may accelerate the maturityissued through The Industrial Development Authority of the bonds and exercise any otherCounty of its available rights and remedies. In either case, if our indebtedness is accelerated and we are unable to pay the required amount, the lender, or trustee in the case of a default under the bond loan agreements, has the right to foreclose on the net operating revenues of our subsidiaries securing the indebtedness. In addition, the lender has a security interest in the stock of certain of our regulated subsidiaries and in the membership interests of Global Water Management, LLC.
Pima. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Non-GAAP Measure”Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Tax Exempt Bonds” and “The Transactions—Planned Refinancing Transaction” for additional information. Based on discussions with lenders and at current interest rates, we believe we can reduce the effective interest rate on the outstanding balance of our tax-exempt bonds by approximately 75 to 150 basis points. Our ability to complete the refinancing and to reduce our effective interest rate will be subject to market

conditions at the time. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that we will be able to complete the refinancing in a discussion of howtimely manner or at all, or that, if completed, we consider and use EBITDA and for a calculation of EBITDA for years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.

will be able to reduce the interest rates on our debt as we expect.

Risks Related to This Offering and Ownership of Our Common Stock

If you purchase shares of our common stock in this Offeringoffering, you will incur immediate and substantial dilution.

There has been no prior public trading market

Dilution is the difference between the offering price per share and the pro forma net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after the offering. The price you pay for shares of our common stock and an active trading market may not develop following completion of this offering.

Prior tosold in this offering there has been nois substantially higher than our pro forma net tangible book value per share immediately after this offering. Based on the initial public marketoffering price for our common stock. An active tradingstock, you will incur immediate dilution in net tangible book value per share of $        . In addition, you may also experience additional dilution, or potential dilution, upon future equity issuances to investors or to our employees and directors under our equity incentive plan and any other plans we may adopt. As a result of this dilution, investors purchasing shares of our common stock in this offering may receive significantly less than the full purchase price that they paid for in this offering in the event of liquidation. See “Dilution” for additional information.

Substantial future sales of our common stock, or the perception in the public markets that these sales may occur, may depress our stock price.

Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market may not develop following completion ofafter this offering, or if developed, may not be sustained. The lack of an active market may impair your ability to sell your shares at the time you wish to sell them or at a priceperception that you consider reasonable. The lack of an active market may also reduce the fair market value of your shares. An inactive market also may impair our ability to raise additional capital in the future by selling shares of capital stock and may impair our ability to acquire other companies by using our shares as consideration.

We expect thatthese sales could occur, could adversely affect the price of our common stock will fluctuate substantially.
The initial public offering price forand could impair our ability to raise capital through the shares sold insale of additional shares. Upon the closing of this offering has been determined by negotiation betweenand the underwriters and us. This price may not reflect the market priceReorganization Transaction, we will have              shares of our common stock following completionoutstanding (or              shares if the underwriter exercises in full its option to purchase additional shares of this offering.our common stock). The priceshares of our common stock may decline,offered in this offering and the priceReorganization Transaction will be freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), except for any shares of our common stock that prevailsmay be held or acquired by our directors, executive officers and other affiliates, as that term is defined in the Securities Act, which may not be sold in the public market unless the sale is registered under the Securities Act or an exemption from registration is available.

We, our officers and directors and certain of our stockholders expect to enter into an agreement that, without the prior written consent of the underwriter, we and they will not, subject to limited exceptions, directly or indirectly sell or dispose of any shares of common stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of our common stock for a period of 180 days after completionthe date of this prospectus. See “Shares Eligible for Future Sale—Lock-Up Agreements” for additional information.

Immediately following this offering, maywe also intend to file a registration statement registering under the Securities Act the shares of our common stock reserved for issuance in respect of stock options and other incentive awards granted to our officers and certain of our employees. See “Executive Compensation—Stock Option Plan.” If these officers or employees cause a large number of securities to be higher or lower thansold in the price you pay, depending on many factors, some of which are beyond our control. Factors thatpublic market, such sales could cause fluctuations inalso reduce the trading price of our common stock include:

• market conditions in our industry sector;
• litigation or public concern about the safety of our systems and services;
• actual and anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly operating results;
• securities analyst coverage of our common stock;
• deviations in our operating results from the estimates of securities analysts or other analyst comments;
• additions or departures of key personnel;
• price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;
• general economic trends; or
• sales of large blocks of our stock.
In addition, the equity markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionateimpede our ability to the operating performance of the listed companies. These broad market factors may affect the market priceraise future capital.

The concentration of our common stock adversely, regardless ofownership with our operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securitiesclass-action litigation often has been instituted against that company. This type of litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.


19


You will experience immediate and substantial dilution as result of this offering and may experience additional dilution in the future, and the initial public offering price may not reflect such dilution.
The initial public offering price of our common stock in this offering is substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share of the outstanding common stock. As a result, investors purchasing shares of common stock in this offering will pay a price that substantially exceeds the value of our assets after subtracting our liabilities. As a result, investors will:
• incur immediate dilution of $      per share, based on the initial public offering price of $      per share; and
• contribute     % of the total amount invested to date to fund our company based on the assumed initial offering price to the public of $      per share, but will own only     % of the shares of common stock outstanding upon completion of this offering.
You will experience additional dilution upon the issuance of equity securities under our current or future equity incentive plans or if we otherwise issue additional shares of our common stock or securities convertible into common stock. See “Dilution.”
We intend to pay only nominal cash dividends on our common stock.
We intend to pay only nominal cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. As a result, prospective purchasers seeking significant dividend income should not invest in the common stock offered under this prospectus. Even if we pay nominal cash dividends, we may not maintain sufficient earnings in the future to continue to do so. All decisions regarding the payment and declaration of dividends lie within the sole discretion of our board of directors. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be your primary source of gain for the foreseeable future. See “Dividend Policy.”
Our executive officers, and directors, certain stockholders and their affiliates will exercise control over stockholder voting matters in a manner that may not be in the best interests of all of our stockholders. This ownership concentration may adversely affect the market price of our shares.limit your ability to influence corporate matters.

Upon completion of this offering, our currentdirectors and executive officers and directorsstockholders holding more than 5% of our capital stock and their affiliates will together controlbeneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately     % of our outstanding common stock. As a result, these stockholders will collectively be able to controlexercise significant influence over all matters requiring stockholder approval, of our stockholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate

transactions, and will have significant control oversuch as a merger or other sale of us or our management and policies. The interests of this group of stockholders may not always coincide with the interests of other stockholders. Theassets. This concentration of ownership alsocould limit your ability to influence corporate matters and may delay, preventhave the effect of delaying or deterpreventing a change inthird party from acquiring control ofover us.

We do not know whether a market will develop for our company even when the change could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common stock as part of a sale of our company or our assets and might affectwhat the prevailing market price of our common stock will be and, as a result, it may be difficult for you to sell your shares of our common stock.

Before this offering, there was no public trading market for our common stock. In connection with this offering, we intend to apply to have our common stock listed on the NASDAQ Global Market. The common shares of GWRC, which currently owns approximately 47.8% of our outstanding common stock, are publicly listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. See “The Transactions—Reorganization Transaction” for additional information. However, if a market for our common stock does not develop or is not sustained, it may be difficult for you to sell your shares of our common stock at an attractive price or at all. We cannot predict the prices at which our common stock will trade. It is possible that in one or more future periods our results of operations may be below the expectations of investment analysts and investors and, as a result of these and other factors, the price of our common stock may fall.

If our operating and financial performance in any given period does not meet the guidance that we provide to the public or the expectations of investment analysts, our stock price may decline.

We may provide public guidance on our expected operating and financial results for future periods. Any such guidance will be comprised of forward-looking statements subject to the risks and uncertainties described in this prospectus and in our other public filings and public statements. Whether or not we provide guidance, investment analysts may publish their estimates of our future financial performance. Our actual results may not always be in line with or exceed any guidance we have provided or the expectations of investment analysts, especially in times of economic uncertainty. If, in the future, our operating or financial results for a particular period do not meet any guidance we provide or the expectations of investment analysts or if we or investment analysts reduce estimates of our performance for future periods, the market price of our common stock may decline.

If investment analysts cease to publish research or reports about our business or if they publish negative evaluations of our common stock, the price of our common stock could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will rely in part on the research and reports that investment analysts publish about us or our business. However, following the consummation of this offering, if no or few analysts commence coverage of the Company, the trading price of our stock would likely decrease. Even if we do obtain such analyst coverage, if one or more of the analysts covering our business downgrade their evaluations of our stock, the price of our common stock could decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover our common stock, we could lose visibility in the market for our stock, which in turn could cause our common stock price to decline.

Our common stock may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the initial public offering price.

After this offering, the market price for our common stock is likely to be volatile, in part because our shares have not been traded publicly. Many factors, which are outside our control, may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly, including those described elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section and this prospectus, as well as the following:

our operating and financial performance and prospects;

our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other companies in our industry compared to market expectations;

conditions that impact demand for our services;

future announcements concerning our business or our competitors’ businesses;

the public’s reaction to our press releases, other public announcements and filings with the SEC;

the size of our public float;

coverage by or changes in financial estimates by investment analysts or failure to meet their expectations;

the market’s reaction to our reduced disclosure as a result of being an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act;

market and industry perception of our success, or lack thereof, in pursuing our growth strategy;

strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings;

changes in laws or regulations which adversely affect our industry or us;

changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles;

changes in senior management or key personnel;

issuances, exchanges or sales, or expected issuances, exchanges or sales of our capital stock;

changes in our dividend policy;

adverse resolution of new or pending litigation against us; and

changes in general market, economic and political conditions in the United States and global economies or financial markets, including those resulting from natural disasters, terrorist attacks, acts of war and responses to such events.

The initial public offering price of our common stock will be determined by negotiations between us and the underwriter based upon a number of factors and may not be indicative of prices that will prevail following the closing of this offering. Volatility in the market price of our common stock may prevent investors from being able to sell their shares of our common stock at or above the initial public offering price. As a result, you may suffer a loss on your investment.

In addition, stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies in our industry. In the past, stockholders have instituted securities class action litigation following periods of market volatility. If we were involved in securities litigation, we could incur substantial costs and our resources and the attention of management could be diverted from our business.

Taking advantage of the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act. As such, we are eligible to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but not limited to, (i) not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (ii) reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and (iii) exemptions from the requirements of holding a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation and of shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We have elected to adopt these reduced disclosure requirements. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive as a result of our taking advantage of these exemptions and as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption

of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We may take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. As a result, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates.

We could remain an emerging growth company for up to five years or until the earliest of (a) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (b) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter and (c) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt securities during the preceding three-year period.

We will incur increased costs as a result of beingbecoming a public company and these additional expenses and other burdens associated with beingin the United States.

As a public company could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

As a public company,in the United States, we will incur significant legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses, that we did notincluding costs associated with U.S. public company reporting requirements. We also have incurred and will incur as a private company that may adversely affect our profitability. In addition,costs associated with the listing requirements of NASDAQ, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as theand related rules and regulations enactedimplemented by the SECSEC. The expenses incurred by U.S. public companies generally for reporting and Nasdaq require specific corporate governance practices for public companies.purposes have been increasing. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs.costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly, although we are currently unable to estimate these costs with any degree of certainty. In addition,estimating these costs, we will incur additional costs associated with our public company reporting requirements. For example, we will be requiredtook into account expenses related to devote significant resources to complete the assessmentinsurance, legal, accounting, and documentation of our internal control system and financial processes under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may incur significant costs to remediate any material weaknesses we identify through these efforts. We also expect these rulescompliance activities, as well as other expenses not currently incurred. These laws and regulations tocould also make it more difficult and more expensive


20


or costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be requiredforced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result,These laws and regulations could also make it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as our executive officers. We cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costsFurthermore, if we may incur or the timing of such costs. Ifare unable to satisfy our profitability is adversely affected because of these additional costs, itobligations as a public company, we could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.
Future salesbe subject to delisting of our common stock, may depressfines, sanctions and other regulatory action and potentially civil litigation.

Our failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as a public company could have a material adverse effect on our stockbusiness and share price.

After

Prior to the completion of this offering, we will have sharesnot had to independently comply with Section 404(a) of common stock outstanding. The           shares sold in this offering, or           shares if the underwriters’ over-allotment is exercised in full,Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, starting with the second annual report that we would expect to file with the SEC. Additionally, once we are no longer an emerging growth company, as defined by the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm will be freely tradable without restrictionrequired pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting on an annual basis. The rules governing the standards that must be met for our management to assess our internal control over financial reporting are complex and require significant documentation, testing and possible remediation.

Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. We are currently in the process of reviewing, documenting and testing our internal control over financial reporting, but we are not currently in compliance with, and we cannot be certain when we will be able to implement the requirements of Section 404(a). We may encounter problems or further registration under federal securities laws unless purchaseddelays in implementing any changes necessary to make a favorable assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, we may encounter problems or delays in completing the implementation of any requested improvements and receiving a favorable attestation in connection with the attestation to be provided by our “affiliates” as such term is used in Rule 144 ofindependent registered public accounting firm after we cease to be an emerging growth company. If we cannot

favorably assess the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and          additional shares of common stock outstanding after completion of this offering will be eligible for sale in the public market as of the date of this prospectus. After thelock-up agreements pertaining to this offering expire 180 days from the date of this prospectus, up to an additional           shareseffectiveness of our common stock will be eligible for sale in the public market, in some cases subject to volume limitations and other restrictions under Rule 144 of the Securities Act,           of which are held by executive officers, directors and their affiliates. If our existing common stockholders sell substantial amounts of common stock in the public market,internal control over financial reporting, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to provide an unqualified attestation report on our internal controls after we cease to be an emerging growth company, investors could lose confidence in our financial information and the market perceives that these sales may occur, the market price of our common stock could decline.

Additionally, the existence of any material weakness or significant deficiency would require management to devote significant time and incur significant expense to remediate any such material weakness or significant deficiency and management may decline, including below the initial public offeringnot be able to remediate any such material weakness or significant deficiency in a timely manner. The existence of any material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting could also result in errors in our financial statements that could require us to restate our financial statements, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and cause stockholders to lose confidence in our reported financial information, all of which could materially and adversely affect our business and share price.

The above information assumes the effectiveness of thelock-up agreements under which

We cannot assure you that we will pay dividends on our officers, directorscommon stock, and certain principal stockholders have agreed notour indebtedness could limit our ability to sell or otherwise dispose of their shares ofpay dividends on our common stock. Janney Montgomery Scott LLC may, in its sole discretion and at any time without notice, release all or any portion of the securities subject tolock-up agreements. In considering any request to release shares subject to alock-up agreement, Janney Montgomery Scott LLC will consider the facts and circumstances relating to a request at the time of that request. See “Shares Eligible for Future Sale.”

In addition, as soon as practicable after

Following the completion of this offering, we intend to filepay a registration statement under the Securities Act covering           shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options or other equity incentives granted or to be granted under our 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Shares registered under this registration statement will be available for sale in the open market, subject to applicable vesting restrictions and the contractuallock-up agreements described above. If these additional shares are sold, or if it is perceived that they will be sold, in the public market, the trading price ofregular monthly dividend on our common stock could decline. See “Shares Eligible for Future Sale.”

Our management teamof $0.02 per share ($0.24 per share annually), or an aggregate of approximately $4.7 million on an annual basis. However, our future dividend policy is subject to our compliance with applicable law, and depending on, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, level of indebtedness, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, restrictions in our debt agreements and in any preferred stock we may invest or spend a portion of the net proceeds of this offering in ways in which you may not agree or in ways that may not yield a return.
We intend to use a portion of the net proceeds of this offering to repay our indebtedness under our line of credit with Wells Fargo Bank, make capital expenditures, fund potential future acquisitions and for general corporate purposes. Our management will have considerable discretionissue in the application of the net proceeds to purposes other than debt repayment, and you will not have the opportunity, as part of your investment decision, to assess whether the proceeds are being applied or allocated appropriately. The net proceeds may be used for corporate purposes that do not increase our operating results or market value. Until the net proceeds are used, they may be placed in investments that do not produce significant income.
Anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law could delay or discourage a takeover that stockholders may consider favorable.
Because we are a Delaware corporation, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which may prohibit certainfuture, business combinations with stockholders owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock. Thisprospects and other provisions under Delaware law could


21


make it more difficult for stockholders or potential acquirers to obtain control of our board of directors or initiate actions that are opposed by the then-current board of directors, including to delay or impede a merger, tender offer, or proxy contest involving our company. Any delay or prevention of a change of control transaction or changes in our board of directors could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
In addition, our articles of incorporation providefactors that our board of directors may issue updeem relevant. Dividend payments are not mandatory or guaranteed; there can be no assurance that we will continue to 1,000,000 sharespay a dividend in the future. See “Dividend Policy” for additional information.

Delaware law and certain provisions in our certificate of preferred stock,incorporation and bylaws may prevent efforts by our stockholders to change the direction or management of the Company.

We are a Delaware corporation, and the anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law impose various impediments to the ability of a third party to acquire control of us, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws that will be in one oreffect upon consummation of this offering are expected to contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more series, without shareholder approval and with such terms, conditions, rights, privileges and preferences asdifficult, including, but not limited to, the following:

only allowing our board of directors, may deem appropriate. As a result, theChairman of our board of directors, is empowered, without shareholder approval,Chief Executive Officer or President to call special meetings of our stockholders;

setting forth specific procedures regarding how our stockholders may present proposals or nominate directors for election at stockholder meetings;

requiring advance notice and duration of ownership requirements for stockholder proposals;

permitting our board of directors to issue preferred stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting or other rights that could adversely affectwithout stockholder approval; and

limiting the voting power or other rights of the holders of common stock. In the event of such issuance, the preferred stockstockholders to amend our bylaws.

These provisions could also be used, under certain circumstances, asdiscourage, delay or prevent a method of discouraging, delaying or preventingtransaction involving a change in control of our company. Although we doThese provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and cause us to take other corporate actions you desire. In addition, because our board of directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions could in turn affect any attempt by our stockholders to replace current members of our management team.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws and which are subject to certain risks, trends and uncertainties. We use words such as “could,” “would,” “may,” “might,” “will,” “expect,” “likely,” “believe,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “project” and other similar expressions to identify some forward-looking statements, but not currently intendall forward-looking statements include these words. All of our forward-looking statements involve estimates and uncertainties that could cause actual results to issue any shares of preferred stock, we may issue such sharesdiffer materially from those expressed in the future.


22

forward-looking statements. Accordingly, any such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the information described under the caption “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus.


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus may containThe forward-looking statements thatcontained in this prospectus are based on assumptions that we have made in light of our management’s beliefsindustry experience and assumptionsour perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and on information currently available toother factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. As you read and consider this prospectus, you should understand that these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. They involve risks, uncertainties (many of which are beyond our management. Any suchcontrol) and assumptions. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements wouldare based on reasonable assumptions, you should be contained principallyaware that many factors could affect our actual operating and financial performance and cause our performance to differ materially from the performance anticipated in “Prospectus Summary,”the forward-looking statements. We believe these factors include, but are not limited to, those described under “Risk Factors,”Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business.Operations.Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possibleShould one or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, financing plans, competitive position, industry environment, potential growth opportunities and the effects of regulation. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by terms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends, “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “will,” “would” or similar expressions.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We discuss manymore of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of these assumptions prove incorrect, our actual operating and financial performance may vary in greater detailmaterial respects from the performance projected in “Risk Factors.” Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also,

Further, any forward-looking statements represent our management’s beliefs and assumptionsstatement speaks only as of the date of this prospectus. You should read this prospectuson which it is made, and the documents that we reference in this prospectus and have filed as exhibits to the registration statement, of which the prospectus is a part, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.

Exceptexcept as required by law, we assumeundertake no obligation to update theseany forward-looking statements publicly,statement contained in this prospectus to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which it is made or to updatereflect the reasonsoccurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances, except as otherwise required by law. New factors that could cause our business not to develop as we expect emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. Further, we cannot assess the impact of each currently known or new factor on our results of operations or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results couldto differ materially from those anticipatedcontained in theseany forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes availablestatements.

INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA

This prospectus contains statistical data, market research and industry forecasts that were obtained from government or independent industry publications and reports or were based on estimates derived from such publications or reports and management’s knowledge of, and experience in, the future. The forward-looking statements containedmarkets in which we operate. Government and industry publications and reports generally indicate that they have obtained their information from sources believed to be reliable, but do not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of their information. None of the third party sources cited in this prospectus are not eligible for the safe harbor protectionhave provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Actany form of 1995 and Section 27Aconsultation, advice or counsel regarding any aspect of, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

CAUTIONARY NOTE
You should rely only on the information containedor is in any way whatsoever associated with, or consenting to this prospectus. We have not authorized anyoneWhile we believe the data referred to provide you with information that is different from that contained in this prospectus. We are offering to sell shares of our common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information contained in this prospectus to be reliable, market and industry data is accurate only assubject to variations and cannot be verified due to limits on the availability and reliability of data inputs, the voluntary nature of the datedata gathering process and other limitations and uncertainties inherent in any statistical survey. Accordingly, the accuracy and completeness of this prospectus, regardlessinformation cannot be guaranteed. Neither we nor the underwriter have independently verified any of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of our common stock.
INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA
Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this prospectus concerning the water, wastewater and recycled water industries, their segments and related markets and our general expectations concerning such industries and their segments and related markets are based on management estimates. Such estimates are derived from publicly available information released by third-party sources, as well as data from our internal research and onthird party sources or ascertained the underlying assumptions maderelied upon by us based on such data and our knowledge of such industries and markets, which we believe to be reasonable.sources. While we are not aware of any misstatements regarding the industry or similar dataany information presented herein, such data involvesin this prospectus, estimates, in particular, as they relate to projections, involve numerous assumptions, are subject to risks and uncertainties, and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed under the headingin “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus.


23


THE TRANSACTIONS

Reorganization Transaction

THE REORGANIZATION
Our operations areConcurrently with the consummation of this offering, GWRC, which currently conducted through Global Water Resources, LLC,owns approximately 47.8% of our outstanding common stock, will merge with and into the Company with the Company surviving as a Delaware limited liability company, andcorporation, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including GWRC’s shareholder approval. At the effective time of the merger, following a number of wholly-owned subsidiaries, all of which are Arizona “C” corporations. Global Water Management, LLC currently provides management services100.68-for-1 forward stock split with respect to our watercommon stock, holders of GWRC’s common shares will receive one share of the Company’s common stock for each outstanding common share of GWRC. We refer to this as the “Reorganization Transaction.” The Reorganization Transaction and wastewater utilities as a commonly controlled entity. Global Water Resources, Inc. has no operating historythe consummation of this offering will be contingent upon each other and was formedwill occur simultaneously.

The shares of our common stock to be issued in the Reorganization Transaction are expected to be issued in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act for the purposeissuance and exchange of acquiring 100%securities approved, after a public hearing upon the fairness of the limited liability company interests in Global Water Resources, LLCterms and in Global Water Management, LLC, currently heldconditions of the exchange, by various investors, including certain executive officers, directors and employeesthe Supreme Court of British Columbia, which is authorized by law to grant such approval.

GWRC was incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) on March 23, 2010 to acquire shares of common stock of the Company pursuantand to a reorganization (the “Reorganization”) described below. Prior to the Reorganization, Global Water Resources, LLC will have 10,000 common limited liability interests and 10,000 preferred limited liability interests outstanding, and Global Water Management, LLC will have 10,000 common limited liability interests and 10,000 preferred limited liability interests outstanding. Global Water Management, LLC and Global Water Resources, LLC have the same investors and the investors hold their common and preferred limited liability interests in each entityactively participate in the same relative proportions.

The ownersmanagement, business and operations of Global Water Management, LLC will contribute theirthe Company through its representation on the board of directors of the Company and its shared management with the Company. GWRC’s common limited liability company interests in that companyshares are publicly listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “GWR.” In connection with this offering, we intend to Global Water Resources, LLC. Thereafter, the owners of Global Water Resources, LLC will contribute their common limited liability company interests in that companyapply to Global Water Resources, Inc., in exchange forhave our common stock oflisted on the NASDAQ Global Water Resources, Inc., in effect incorporating the business of Global Water Resources, LLC. The acquisition of Global Water Management, LLC will improve our ability to allocate management expenses among our utility subsidiaries in accordance with applicable state regulatory requirements.
The number of shares of Global Water Resources, Inc. common stock that will be issued in exchange for common limited liability company interests of Global Water Resources, LLC will be calculated by (i) multiplying the total combined market value of Global Water Resources, LLC and Global Water Management, LLC by the percentage of Global Water Resources, Inc. that the investors in Global Water Resources, LLC and Global Water Management, LLC will own after the initial public offering, and (ii) dividing the resulting amount by the initial public offering price for the Global Water Resources, Inc. common stock.
Market. In addition, the preferred limited liability company interestsCompany will become a reporting issuer in each of Global Water Resources, LLCthe provinces and Global Water Management, LLCterritories of Canada and will be redeemedsubject to continuous disclosure obligations under the applicable securities laws of those jurisdictions. We expect that the Company will qualify as described below.
Under Arizona utility regulations,an “SEC foreign issuer” under Canadian securities laws, which means that the Reorganization, andCompany will be exempt from the initial public offering, must be approved by the ACC. On May 13, 2008, we filed a noticecontinuous disclosure requirements of intentCanadian securities laws, subject to certain exceptions, if it complies with the ACC requesting approval ofreporting requirements applicable in the Reorganization and the initial public offering. The notice of intent is currently under review by the Commission. We cannot sell our shares to the public without approval from the ACC.


24United States.


The following diagram sets forth theour ownership structure prior to the Reorganization:
OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE PRIOR TO THE REORGANIZATION
(FLOW CHART)
To effect the Reorganization and immediately prior to the effectiveness of this offering, we will enter into a contribution agreement among Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC and their respective members. Pursuant to the contribution agreement:
• The members of Global Water Management, LLC will contribute on a tax-free basis, all of their common limited liability company interests in that company to Global Water Resources, LLC for no consideration, resulting in Global Water Management, LLC becoming wholly-owned by Global Water Resources, LLC after the redemption of the preferred limited liability company interests described below.
• The members of Global Water Resources, LLC will contribute on a tax-free basis all of their common limited liability company interests in that company to Global Water Resources, Inc., resulting in Global Water Resources, LLC becoming wholly-owned by Global Water Resources, Inc. after the redemption of the preferred limited liability company interests described below.
• We will issue           shares of Global Water Resources, Inc. common stock, on a pro rata basis, to the members of Global Water Resources, LLC in exchange for the common limited liability company interests in Global Water Resources, LLC contributed by them to Global Water Resources, Inc.
• Global Water Resources, LLC will redeem all of the outstanding preferred limited liability company interests of Global Water Resources, LLC and Global Water Management, LLC will redeem all of the outstanding preferred limited liability company interests of Global Water Management, LLC for an aggregate redemption price equal to the sum of unreturned capital contributions made in respect of the


25

Transaction:


LOGO

preferred limited liability company interests and the accrued but unpaid preferred rate of return at the rate of 8% per annum thereon from January 1, 2008 through the date of redemption. The aggregate redemption price will be financed through additional borrowings under our revolving credit facility, which will be repaid with the net proceeds of this offering. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Cash Flows from Financing Activities.”
Following the completion of the transactions described in the contribution agreement, Global Water Resources, LLC will merge into us in a transaction disregarded for tax purposes, thereby eliminating the existence of Global Water Resources, LLC.

The following diagram illustrates thesets forth our ownership structure following the Reorganization:

OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE AFTER THE REORGANIZATION
(FLOW CHART)


26

Reorganization Transaction:


LOGO

Planned Refinancing Transaction

Following the consummation of this offering and the Reorganization Transaction, we plan to refinance all of our tax-exempt bonds issued through The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Tax Exempt Bonds” for additional information concerning these bonds. The loan agreements relating to such bonds provide a redemption option exercisable by the Company at a price of 103% of the principal amount redeemed, plus interest accrued up to the redemption date, in the event of a “public offering” of ownership interests in the Company. This offering, once completed, will constitute a public offering of ownership interests in the Company. If we exercise this option, we must complete the redemption within 90 days after closing of the public offering. As of December 31, 2015, the principal balance of such bonds was $106.7 million. Based on discussions with lenders, we believe we can reduce the effective interest rate on the

outstanding balance by approximately 75 to 150 basis points. Our ability to complete the refinancing and to reduce our effective interest rate will be subject to market conditions at the time. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that we will be able to complete the refinancing in a timely manner or at all, or that, if completed, we will be able to reduce the interest rates on our debt as we expect. See “Risk Factors—We may not be able to refinance our indebtedness on favorable terms or at all.”

USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate that we will receiveour net proceeds from the sale of our common stock that we are offering will be approximately $         million, from our sale ofor approximately $         million if the underwriter exercises in full its option to purchase additional shares of our common stock, in this offering, based uponassuming an assumed initial public offering price of $         per share, which is the midpoint of the price range on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. IfA $1.00 increase (decrease) in the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised in full, we estimate that ourassumed initial public offering price of $         per share would increase (decrease) the net proceeds will be approximatelyto us from our initial public offering by $         million.

million, assuming the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions.

We planintend to use the net proceeds from this offering for working capital and other general corporate purposes.

DIVIDEND POLICY

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we paid cash dividends to holders of our common stock totaling $26.5 million (which included a special one-time dividend of $22.8 million paid in August 2015 to distribute to stockholders a portion of the net proceeds of this offering to repay all outstanding indebtedness under our $60.0 million revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank,the condemnation of which approximately $38.0 million was outstanding atthe operations and assets of Valencia Water Company). For the year ended December 31, 2007. Prior2014, we paid cash dividends to holders of our common stock totaling $3.5 million. We did not declare any dividends for the effectivenessyear ended December 31, 2013.

Following the completion of this offering, we planintend to increasepay a regular monthly dividend on our borrowings under this facility to finance the redemptioncommon stock of preferred limited liability company interests as described in “The Reorganization.” The$0.02 per share ($0.24 per share annually), or an aggregate redemption price will be $26.0of approximately $4.7 million plus a return on that amount calculated at an annual rate of 8% from January 1, 2008 until the day of redemption. Our revolving credit facility will terminatebasis. However, our future dividend policy is subject to our compliance with applicable law, and depending on, March 31, 2009 unless extended and is used primarily for short-term working capital needs. Advances bear interest at the prime rate of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. less 1.25%, resulting in a current interest rate of     %.

In addition to repaying indebtedness as described above, we plan to use approximately $     million of the net proceeds of this offering for capital expenditures and to use the remaining $     million to finance potential future acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.
The amounts and timing of our actual expenditures may vary significantly from our expectations depending upon numerous factors, includingamong other things, our results of operation,operations, financial condition, level of indebtedness, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, restrictions in our debt agreements and capital requirements. Accordingly,in any preferred stock we will retainmay issue in the discretion to allocate the net proceeds of this offering among the identified uses described above,future, business prospects and we reserve the right to change the allocation of the net proceeds among the uses described above. Pending their use, we intend to invest the net proceeds in short-term, interest-bearing, investment-grade securities. We cannot predict whether the proceeds invested will yield a favorable return.
DIVIDEND POLICY
Prior to this offering, Global Water Resources, LLC paid quarterly cash distributions to the holders of its common and preferred limited liability company interests. Following the consummation of this offering and the Reorganization, however, we intend to pay only nominal cash dividends for the foreseeable future, as we plan to apply our earnings to working capital in order to finance our growth and support our operations. Any future determination relating to our dividend policy will be at the discretion ofother factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. See “Risk Factors—We cannot assure you that we will pay dividends on our common stock, and will dependour indebtedness could limit our ability to pay dividends on many factors, including our financial conditioncommon stock.”

CAPITALIZATION

The table below shows our cash and results of operations, liquidity requirements, capital requirements of our subsidiaries, legal requirements, regulatory constraintscash equivalents and other factors our board of directors deems relevant.

CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of December 31, 2007,September 30, 2015:

on an actual basis;

on an as follows:adjusted basis to give effect to the Reorganization Transaction; and

• On a historical combined basis;
• On a pro forma basis after giving effect to the Reorganization, the incurrence of additional indebtedness to finance the redemption of the outstanding preferred interests in Global Water Resources, LLC and the application of the proceeds of such indebtedness to such redemption as described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “The Reorganization”; and
• On a pro formaon an as further adjusted basis to give effect to our sale of shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $      per share and the receipt and application of the net


27


proceeds of this offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, as set forth under “Use of Proceeds.”
The pro forma as adjusted information below is illustrative only. You should read this table together with the sections of this prospectus entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
             
  As of December 31, 2007 
        Pro Forma
 
  Historical  Pro Forma  as Adjusted (1) 
  (In thousands) 
 
Cash and cash equivalents $166  $166  $   — 
             
Short-term debt            
Loan payable—current portion $138  $138  $ 
             
Long-term debt            
Bank loans payable(2)  38,042   64,057    
Bonds payable  90,115   90,115    
             
Total long-term debt  128,157   154,172    
             
Total debt  128,295   154,310    
             
Members’ equity            
Contributed capital  26,001       
Undistributed preferred return  14       
Common unit deficit  (14,600)      
Stockholders’ equity            
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 100,000,000 shares authorized;          shares issued and outstanding on a pro forma basis;          shares issued and outstanding on a pro forma as adjusted basis(3)         
Retained earnings (deficit)     (14,600)   
             
Total members’ / stockholders’ equity  11,415   (14,600)   
             
Total capitalization $139,710  $139,710  $ 
             
(1)A $      increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $      per share would increase (decrease) each of cash and cash equivalents, total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization by $ million assuming the number of shares offered, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable.
(2)In connection with the Reorganization, $26.0 million of contributed capital represented by preferred limited liability company interests will be redeemed with additional borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
(3)The increase in stockholders’ equity on a pro forma as adjusted basis is based on offering proceeds of $     , less $      of underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, resulting in estimated net proceeds of $     .
The number of              shares of common stock that will be outstanding upon completion ofin this offering is based onat the number of shares outstanding on a pro forma basis as of December 31, 2007. This number does not include          shares reserved for issuance under our 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan.initial public offering price, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions.


28

   As of September 30, 2015 
   Actual  As
Adjusted
  As Further
Adjusted
 
   (In thousands) 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $16,767   $17,450   $              
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Debt:

    

5.450% Series 2006 bonds(1)

   2,955    2,955   

5.600% Series 2006 bonds(1)

   6,215    6,215   

5.750% Series 2006 bonds(1)

   23,370    23,370   

6.550% Series 2007 bonds(1)

   51,532    51,532   

6.375% Series 2008 bonds(1)

   820    820   

7.500% Series 2008 bonds(1)

   23,235    23,235   

Capital lease obligations

   314    314   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total debt

   108,441    108,441   

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 1,000,000 shares authorized, 181,449 shares issued and outstanding on an actual basis; 60,000,000 shares authorized, 18,268,939(2) shares issued and outstanding on an as adjusted basis; 60,000,000 shares authorized,              shares issued and outstanding on an as further adjusted basis

   2    1   

Treasury stock

   —      1   

Paid-in capital

   23,417    23,173   

Accumulated deficit

   (1,568  (1,568 
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

   21,851    21,607   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total capitalization

  $130,292   $130,048   $   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

(1)Following the consummation of this offering and the Reorganization Transaction, we plan to refinance these tax-exempt bonds, which were issued through The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima. See “The Transactions—Planned Refinancing Transaction” for additional information.
(2)Gives effect to a 100.68-for-1 forward stock split with respect to our common stock that will be effected prior to the completion of this offering in connection with the Reorganization Transaction.


DILUTION

DILUTION
If you invest in our common stock, your ownership interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the initial public offering price in this offering per share of our common stock in this offering and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock after completionupon consummation of this offering. Net tangible book value per share is determined at any date by subtracting our total liabilities fromrepresents the total book value of our total tangible assets (total assets less intangible assets) and dividing the differencebook value of our total liabilities divided by the number of our shares of common stock deemedthen issued and outstanding.

Our pro forma net tangible book value as of September 30, 2015, was approximately $21.6 million, or approximately $1.18 per share based on the 18,268,939 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of such date after giving effect to the Reorganization Transaction and the 100.68-for-1 forward stock split with respect to our common stock that will be outstandingeffected prior to the completion of this offering. After giving effect to the Reorganization Transaction (including the 100.68-for-1 forward stock split) and our sale of our common stock in this offering at that date. Dilutionthe initial public offering price of $         per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus), and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and estimated expenses related to this offering, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book deficit as of September 30, 2015 would have been $         million, or $         per share (assuming no exercise of the underwriter’s option to purchase additional shares). This represents an immediate and substantial dilution of $         per share to new investors purchasing common stock in this offering. The following table illustrates this dilution per share:

Assumed initial public offering price per share

    $              

Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2015 before this offering(1)

  $1.18    

Increase in pro forma net tangible book value per share attributable to this offering

    
  

 

 

   

Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after the Reorganization Transaction (including the 100.68-for-1 forward stock split) and this offering

    
    

 

 

 

Dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share to investors in this offering

    $   
    

 

 

 

(1)Gives pro forma effect to the Reorganization Transaction and the 100.68-for-1 forward stock split with respect to our common stock that will be effected prior to the completion of this offering.

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $         per share would increase (decrease) our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share representsafter the difference betweenReorganization Transaction (including the amount per share paid100.68-for-1 forward stock split) and this offering by purchasers$         , assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of common stockthis prospectus, remains the same, and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions payable by us.

If the underwriter exercises in full its option to purchase additional shares in this offering, and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share ofafter the Reorganization Transaction (including the 100.68-for-1 forward stock split) and this offering would be approximately $         per share, and the dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per share to new investors purchasing common stock immediately after completionin this offering would be approximately $         per share.

SELECTED HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following tables present, as of this offering.

Ourthe dates and for the periods indicated, the selected historical net tangible deficiency in assetsand pro forma consolidated financial data for Global Water Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The consolidated statement of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2007 was approximately $68 million, or approximately $      per share2014 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements that are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The consolidated statement of operations data for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2015 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2015 are derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. In our opinion, such financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information set forth in those statements. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our common stock. Priorresults in any future period.

We have derived the pro forma consolidated financial data from our unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. The pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2015 is adjusted to give effect to the effectivenessReorganization Transaction. The pro forma condensed consolidated statement of this offering, alloperations data for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 is adjusted to give effect to the condemnation of the outstanding preferred equity interestsoperations and assets of GlobalValencia Water Resources, LLC will be redeemed throughCompany as if the application of proceeds of new indebtedness that will remain outstanding followingtransaction had occurred on January 1, 2014.

You should read this information together with our consolidated financial statements and the completion of this offeringrelated notes and our unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information and related notes, as described inwell as the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.Operations.

After giving effect to the Reorganization, the redemption of all outstanding preferred equity interests in Global Water Resources, LLC and the sale of           shares offered by us in this offering at an assumed initial public offering price of $      per share, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and our estimated offering expenses, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value as of December 31, 2007 would have been approximately $     million, or approximately $      per share of common stock. This represents an immediate increase in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value of $      per share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value of $      per share to new investors. The following table illustrates this per share dilution:

   September 30,
2015
  Pro Forma
September 30,
2015
  December 31,
2014
    
   (dollars in thousands)    

ASSETS:

  

Net property, plant and equipment

  $193,611   $193,611   $240,424   

Current assets

   26,001    26,176    12,293   

Other assets

   25,296    25,296    54,884   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total Assets

  $244,908   $245,083   $307,601   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

LIABILITIES:

     

Current liabilities

  $13,486   $13,669   $13,630   

Noncurrent liabilities

   209,571    209,807    266,291   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total Liabilities

   223,057    223,476    279,921   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   21,851    21,607    27,680   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

  $244,908   $245,083   $307,601   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  
   Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2015
  Pro Forma
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2015
  Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
  Year Ended
December 31,
2014
 
   (dollars in thousands, except per share data) 

Revenues

  $24,847   $21,581   $24,646   $32,559  

Operating expenses

   19,736    17,109    (29,273  (22,232
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Operating income

   5,111    4,472    53,919    54,791  

Total other income (expense)

   37,179    (5,897  (4,626  (6,855
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

   42,290    (1,425  49,293    47,936  

Income tax benefit (expense)

   (20,897  510    16,477    16,995  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

  $21,393   $(915 $65,770   $64,931  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

  $117.63   $(0.05)(1)  $361.27   $356.67  

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

  $117.63   $(0.05)(1)  $361.27   $356.67  

Assumed initial public offering price per share of common stock$
Historical net tangible book value per share as of          $
Pro forma net tangible book value per share before this offering
Pro forma increase per share attributable to investors participating in this offering
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after completion of this offering
Pro forma dilution per share to investors participating in this offering$
The following table summarizes, as of December 31, 2007, the differences between our existing stockholders and investors in this offering with respect to the total number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the total consideration paid to us, and the average price per share paid by our existing stockholders and the price per share paid by investors in this offering based on the initial public offering price of $      per share, before deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us:
                     
              Average
 
  Shares Purchased  Total Consideration  Price Per
 
  Number  Percent  Amount  Percent  Share 
  (In thousands, except per share amounts) 
 
Existing stockholders(1)                    
New investors                    
Total      100.0%      100.0%    
(1)Reflects the price paid for common limited liability company interests in Global Water Resources, LLC,As adjusted to give effect to the shares ofa 100.68-for-1 forward stock split with respect to our common stock received in exchange therefor pursuantthat will be effected prior to the Reorganization.completion of this offering in connection with the Reorganization Transaction.
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, the net tangible book value per share after completion of this offering would be $      per share, the increase in net tangible book value per share to existing stockholders would be $      per share and the dilution in net tangible book value to new investors would be $      per share.


29


SELECTED HISTORICAL COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents our selected historical combined consolidated financial data at the dates and for the periods indicated. The statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 have been derived from our audited combined consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The statement of operations data for the year ended December 31, 2004 and periods ended February 3, 2004 and December 31, 2003, and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2005 have been derived from our audited financial statements and the audited financial statements of Santa Cruz Water Company, LLC and Palo Verde Utilities Company, LLC that are not included in this prospectus. Because the Reorganization will be consummated immediately prior to the effectiveness of this offering, we are presenting the historical financial data for Global Water Resources, LLC, including its subsidiaries, and Global Water Management, LLC, which are under common ownership and common management, on a combined basis. See “The Reorganization.”
Our historical combined consolidated financial data are not necessarily indicative of our future performance and should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, the information in the sections in this prospectus entitled “Summary Historical and Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data,” “Use of Proceeds,” “Capitalization,” “Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Consolidated Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.
                              
                  Combined Predecessor
 
              For the Period
   Companies(1) 
  Global Water Combined Consolidated  from
        
              September 24,
   For the
    
              2003
   Thirty-Four
  For the
 
              (inception) to
   Days Ended
  Year Ended
 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  December 31,
   February 3,
  December 31,
 
  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003   2004  2003 
  (In thousands)   (In thousands) 
Statement of operations data:
                             
Operating revenues $25,809  $20,849  $12,943  $4,905  $   $182  $1,642 
Operating expenses                             
Operations and maintenance  2,637   1,467   792   589       36   353 
General and administrative  9,974   6,754   3,413   1,341   174    26   488 
Depreciation and amortization  8,613   5,601   3,338   1,572   2    52   586 
                              
Total operating expenses  21,224   13,822   7,543   3,502   176    114   1,427 
                              
Operating income  4,585   7,027   5,400   1,403   (176)   68   215 
Other income (expense) Interest income  380   32   2   3       1   1 
Interest expense  (4,329)  (1,448)  (7)  (256)          
Other, net  (31)  (34)  19   2          2 
                              
Total other income (expense)  (3,980)  (1,450)  14   (251)      1   3 
                              
Income from continuing operations before income taxes  605   5,577   5,414   1,152   (176)   69   218 
                              
(continued)


30


                              
                  Combined Predecessor
 
              For the Period
   Companies(1) 
  Global Water Combined Consolidated  from
        
              September 24,
   For the
    
              2003
   Thirty-Four
  For the
 
              (inception) to
   Days Ended
  Year Ended
 
  For the Year Ended December 31,  December 31,
   February 3,
  December 31,
 
  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003   2004  2003 
  (In thousands)   (In thousands) 
Income tax expense (benefit)  (1,404)  (740)                
                              
Income from continuing operations $2,009  $6,317  $5,414  $1,152  $(176)  $69  $218 
                              
Other data:
                             
Cash flows provided by (used in):                             
Operating activities $5,891  $36,783  $23,435  $6,398  $(148)  $505  $985 
Investing activities  52,074   (67,358)  (33,612)  (40,642)  (352)   (302)  (10,081)
Financing activities  45,935   30,850   9,000   35,548   511    17   9,330 
             
  As of December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
Combined Consolidated balance sheet data:
            
Cash and cash equivalents $166  $414  $138 
Property, plant, and equipment, net of depreciation  230,232   172,749   89,524 
Total assets  328,065   265,311   116,052 
Short term debt  138   146    
Long term debt  128,157   60,583   23,153 
Total liabilities  316,650   246,411   92,264 
Members’ equity  11,415   18,900   23,788 
(1)Results for predecessor companies represent combined results for Palo Verde Utilities Company, LLC and Santa Cruz Water Company, LLC, which were under common ownership and common management prior to their acquisition by us, for the periods indicated.

31


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations covers periods prior to the consummation of the Reorganization. Accordingly, the discussion and analysis of historical periods does not reflect the impact that the Reorganization will have on us. You should be read the following discussion together with the financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on management’s current expectations, estimates and projections about our business and operations. The cautionary statements made in this prospectus should be read as applying to all related forward-looking statements whenever they appear in this prospectus. Our actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of number of factors, including those we discuss under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. You should read “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking“Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Overview

We ownare a leading water resource management company that owns, operates and operate 16 water and wastewater utilities that providemanages water, wastewater and recycled water toutilities in strategically targetedlocated communities, principally in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona. We currently serve more than 60,000 peopleseek to deploy our integrated approach, which we refer to as “Total Water Management,” a term we use to mean managing the entire water cycle by owning and operating the water, wastewater and recycled water utilities within the same geographic areas in approximately 23,000 homes within our 378 square miles of service areas; 206 square miles have been certificatedorder to both conserve water and are serviced by seven regulated operating subsidiaries.

maximize its total economic and social value. We use Total Water Management to promote sustainable communities in areas where we expect growth to outpace the existing potable water supply. Our TWM model focuses on the broad issues of water supply and scarcity and applies principles of water conservation through water reclamation and reuse. ItsOur basic premise is that ourthe world’s water supply is limited but renewable, and shouldyet can be managedstretched significantly through effective planning, the use of recycled water and by providing individuals and communities resources that promote wise water usage practices.

Business Outlook

2014 and year-to-date 2015 continued the trend of positive growth in new connections and re-establishing service on existing previously vacant homes. According to ensure that developmentthe 2010 U.S. Census Data, the Phoenix metropolitan statistical area had a population of 4.2 million in 2010 and is sustainablethe 14th largest metropolitan statistical area in the faceU.S., an increase of water scarcity.

We29% over the 3.25 million people in the 2000 Census. Metropolitan Phoenix’s growth data continues to improve due to its low-cost housing, excellent weather, large and growing universities, a diverse employment base and low taxes. The Employment and Population Statistics Department of the State of Arizona predicts that Maricopa County will have grown significantly since our formationa population of 4.5 million by 2020 and 6.0 million by 2040. During the twelve months ended September 30, 2015, Arizona’s employment rate improved by 2.4%, ranking Arizona in 2003, with total revenues increasingthe top thirteen states nationally for job growth.

Also, according to the W.P. Carey School of Business Greater Phoenix Blue Chip Real Estate Consensus panel, most sectors of real estate are expected to experience improved occupancy and growth. After a decline to fewer than 6,800 units in 2011, single family housing permits bounced back to 11,615 units in 2012, and continued to climb in 2013 to 12,785 units. The Blue Chip consensus forecast indicates permits for 2014 declined to approximately 11,800 units at year end, down from $4.9 millionan original forecast of 14,100 units for the year. However, for the first 11 months of 2015, permits were up approximately 48% to $25.8 million from 2004 to 2007. Our growth is driven by organicnearly 16,000 units and the forecast for 2016 remains positive at approximately 20,000 units. From there, growth in the region could steadily return to its normal historical rate of greater than 30,000 single family dwelling permits. Additionally, multifamily, office, retail, and industrial market occupancy rates continued to increase in 2014 compared to 2013 and are expected to continue to increase through 2016. Phoenix was one of the worst performing housing markets during the housing downturn, but home prices have risen on average approximately 9.1% per year over the past three years ending August 2015, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller Phoenix Home Price Index.

We believe that our existingacquired utilities and service areas and expansion into neware directly in the anticipated path of growth primarily in the metropolitan Phoenix area. Market data indicates that our service areas through the acquisition and formation of utilities.

We have acquired 13 regulated utilities from 2004 to 2007, representingcurrently incorporate a total of 9,643 service connections and 162 square miles of certificated service area, measured aslarge portion of the datefinal platted lots, partially finished lots and finished lots in metropolitan Phoenix. Management believes that the Company is well-positioned to benefit from the near-term growth in metropolitan Phoenix due to the availability of each acquisition. We subsequently expanded the certificated service arealots and realized organic growthexisting infrastructure in place within those serviceour services areas. See “Business—Our Regulated Utilities” for more information regarding our acquisition history.
The following chart illustrates our service connection growth for 2004 to 2007. Service connections grew from 8,145 at December 31, 2004 to 38,682 at December 31, 2007.
Total Connections
(BAR CHART)
Our regulated subsidiaries’ operations are subject to oversight and regulation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the ACC, the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (“ADEQ”), the Arizona Department of Water Resources (“ADWR”), and the Maricopa County Environmental Services Department. See “Business—Regulation.”
We also provide services that are not subject to economic regulation by the ACC. These services include financing agreements with developers and builders, the production and resale of stored water credits, provision


32


of back-office billing and laboratory services to third parties and sales of water meters. In 2007, these services generated collectively $8.1 million in operating revenue. See “Business—Our Unregulated Business” for additional information regarding these businesses.
Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

Our financial condition and results of operations are influenced by a variety of industry-wide factors, including:including but not limited to:

population and community growth;

economic and environmental utility regulation;
• water scarcity management;
• economic utility regulation;
• infrastructure investment;
• population and community growth;
• commercial and industrial growth;
• infrastructure coordination and finance agreements;
• compliance with environmental, health and safety standards;
• production and treatment costs; and
• weather and seasonality.

economic environment;

the need for infrastructure investment;

production and treatment costs;

weather and seasonality; and

access to and quality of water supply.

We are subject to economic regulation by the state regulator, the Arizona Corporation Commission. The U.S. federal and state governments also regulate environmental, health and safety and water quality matters. We continue to execute on our strategy to optimize and focus the Company in order to provide greater value to our customers and shareholders by aiming to deliver predictable financial results, making prudent capital investments and focusing our efforts on earning an appropriate rate of return on our investments.

Water Scarcity ManagementPopulation and Community Growth

Optimizing scarce water resources is important

Population and community growth in the metropolitan Phoenix area served by our utilities have a direct impact on our earnings. An increase or decrease in our active service connections will affect our revenues and variable expenses in a corresponding manner. Our total service connections, which include active service connections and connections to vacant homes, increased to 45,235 as of December 31, 2014 from 44,608 as of December 31, 2013. Our active service connections increased by 842 to 43,568 as of December 31, 2014 compared to 42,726 as of December 31, 2013, representing annual increase of 2.0%.

Due to the communitiescondemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company in July 2015 (see “—Recent Events” below), total connections, including active service connections and connections to vacant homes, decreased to 38,620 as of September 30, 2015 from 45,104 as of September 30, 2014. Our active service connections decreased to 37,638 as of September 30, 2015, of which approximately 94.9% are serviced by our Santa Cruz and Palo Verde utilities, compared to 43,374 as of September 30, 2014. See “Risk Factors—Our active service areasconnections are primarily concentrated in one water utility and there is increasing demandone wastewater utility.”

Adjusting for technologythe condemnation of the operations and incentives that promote conservation. At the household level, increased water conservation, including the useassets of more efficient fixtures and appliances,Valencia Water Company, we continue to see a positive trend in new connections combined with re-establishing service to existing homes. As illustrated in the graph below, which reflects the adjustment for the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company, adjusted connections totaled 38,620 as of September 30, 2015 compared to 38,156 as of September 30, 2014, which represents an increase of 464 connections, or an annualized increase of approximately 1.2%. Adjusted active connections totaled 37,638 as of September 30, 2015 compared to 36,746 as of September 30, 2014, which represents an increase of 892 connections, or an annualized increase of approximately 2.4%.

LOGO

During the economic downturn beginning in 2008, our utilities experienced an increase in the number of vacant homes, reaching a general decline in U.S. household sizes, has contributedpeak of 4,647 vacant connections as of February 28, 2009, approximately 11.2% of our total connections at the time; however, the negative trend began to a trendreverse thereafter with the number of declining per residential customer water usage. Our integrated TWM approachvacant homes decreasing to 982, or 2.5% of total connections, at September 30, 2015.

Economic and our water scarcity management initiatives are designed for and promote conservation of Arizona’s limited water resources, and we are well positioned to benefit from water scarcity management programs. We have sold recycled water at a range of prices below those of potable water, but believe there is a trend toward parity between pricing for recycled and potable water that presents opportunities for significant revenue growth. See “Business—Our Strengths—Demonstrated Ability to Align Green and Socially Responsible Practices into our Profitable Growth Company.”

EconomicEnvironmental Utility Regulation
Our regulated utility subsidiaries, which are investor-owned utilities,

We are subject to extensive economic and non-economic regulation of our rates by Arizona’s public utility commission, the ACC. The ACC has exclusive authority to approve rates, mandate accounting treatments, authorize long-term financing programs, evaluate significant capital expenditures and plant additions, examine and regulate transactions between a regulated subsidiary and its affiliated entities and approve or disapprove reorganizations, mergers and acquisitions prior to their completion. Additionally, the ACC has statutory authority to oversee service quality and consumer complaints, and approve or disapprove expansion of service areas. The ACC is comprised of five elected members, each serving four year terms. Three of the five members of the ACC will not stand for reelection in 2008 and will be replaced by newly-elected members at year-end 2008.

The ACCArizona Corporation Commission, which is charged with establishing rates based on the provision of reliable service at reasonable cost while also providing an opportunity to earn a fair rate of return on rate base for our investors.investors of utilities. The ACCArizona Corporation Commission uses a historichistorical test year to evaluate whether the plant in service is used and useful, to assess whether costs were prudently incurred and to set “just and reasonable’’reasonable” rates. We believe allowedRate base is typically the depreciated original cost of the plant in service (net of contributions in aid of construction and “advances in aid of construction,” which are funds or property provided to a utility under the terms of a collection main extension agreement, the value of which may be refundable), that has been determined to have been “prudently invested” and “used and useful,” although the reconstruction cost of the utility plant may also be considered in determining the rate base. The Arizona Corporation Commission also decides on an applicable capital structure based on actual or hypothetical analyses. The Arizona Corporation Commission determines a “rate of return” on that rate base which includes the approved capital structure and the actual cost of debt and a fair and reasonable cost of equity based on the Arizona Corporation Commission’s judgment. The overall revenue requirement for rate making purposes is established by multiplying the rate of return on equity will soon be affected by whether we employ state-mandated “best management practices” to reduce water consumption. Best management practices are currently being considered by the ACC, ADWRrate base, and other agencies.


33

adding “prudently” incurred operating expenses for the test year, depreciation and any applicable pro forma adjustments.


To ensure an optimal combination of broad-based access to water and water conservation andbalanced with a fair rate of return for our investors, our water utility operating revenue is based on two components: a fixed fee and a

consumption or volumetric fee. For our water utilities, the fixed fee, or “basic service charge”charge,” provides access to water for residential usage and has generally been set at a level to produce 40% to 60%50% of total revenue. The volumetric fee is based on the total volume of water supplied to a given customer after the minimum number of gallons, if any, covered by the basic service charge, multiplied by a price per gallon set by a tariff approved by the ACC.Arizona Corporation Commission. A discount to the volumetric rate applies for customers that use less than an amount specified by the Arizona Corporation Commission. For all investor-owned water utilities, the Arizona Corporation Commission requires the establishment of inverted tier conservation oriented rates, meaning that the price of water increases as consumption increases. For wastewater utilities, wastewater collection isand treatment can be based on volumetric or fixed fees. Our wastewater utility services are billed based solely on a fixed fee, for service, with tiers for typesdetermined by the size of service, and recycledthe water meter installed. Recycled water is sold on a volumetric basis. When proposing rates for new service areas, we assume a low level of water usage consistentbasis with our conservation practices. This results in a higher price per gallon and is consistentno fixed fee component.

We are required to file rate cases with the ACC’s current and growing emphasis on conservation.

ToArizona Corporation Commission to obtain approval for a change in rates, we must file rate cases with the ACC.rates. Rate cases and other rate-related proceedings can take a year or more to complete. ThereAs a result, there is therefore frequently a delay, or regulatory lag, between the time of a capital investment or incurrence of an operating expense increase and when those costs are reflected in rates. We haveIn normal conditions, it would not be uncommon to see us file for a rate increase every three years based on year one being the test year, year two being the rate case management program to help mitigatefiling year and year three being the risk of regulatory lag.
The continuation of our non-regulated stored water credit business depends upon two renewable recharge permits issued byrate case award year. However, based on the ADWR that currently expire in 2018recent settlement with the Arizona Corporation Commission and 2021. Recharge facilities permits will be renewed every 20 years provided the facility continues to meet state statutory requirements for recharge facilities and demonstrates continued hydro-geological feasibility. We therefore assume thatextended new rate phase-in period, we will receive renewals.
Infrastructure Investment
Capital expendituresnot be initiating the next rate case on this timeline. Moving forward, we will continue to analyze all factors that drive the requirement for infrastructure investment are a componentincreased revenue, including our rate of the rate base on which our regulated utility subsidiaries are allowed to earn an equity return. Capital expenditures for infrastructure provide a basis for earnings growth by expanding our “used and useful” rate base, which is a component of our permitted return on investment and revenue requirement. Capital expenditures have exceeded our operating cash flows due to growth in our service areas. We are able to recover a rate of return on these capital expenditures (return on equity and debt service), together with debt service and certain operating costs, through the rates we charge.
We estimate that our funded capital investment will total approximately $250 million over the next five years, ranging from approximately $20 million in 2008 to approximately $60 million per year thereafter, depending on the timing of major capital projects. The majority of our existing infrastructure is less than five years old, and our capital investment plans are primarily for the construction of new facilities to address service connection growth. Although we use modern materials and expect the useful life of our infrastructure could be as long as 100 years, we will repair and replace existing infrastructure as needed.
These capital investments are needed on an ongoing basis to comply with existing and new regulations, renew treatment and network assets as they age, provide capacity for growth and enhance system reliability, security and quality of service. The need for continuous investment presents a challenge due to the potential for regulatory lag described above. See “—Economic Utility Regulation.”
Population and Community Growth
Population and economic growth in our service areas have a direct impact on our operating revenues. Because our regulated operating revenues are based on water consumption by our customers, an increase or decrease in our customer base will affect our operating revenues,recurring expenses, and infrastructure investment in a corresponding manner. See “Business—Unique Characteristics ofdetermine the Arid Western U.S.—Impact of Projected Growth in Arizona” for information about population growth and economic growth in our service areas.


34


Infrastructure Coordination and Finance Agreements
To promote regional planning and coordination of infrastructure design and development as a key element of our TWM approach, we enter into Infrastructure Coordination and Finance Agreements (ICFAs) with developers and builders. This contractual methodology provides disparate developers access to the benefits of regional infrastructure without needing to plan, permit or build that infrastructure themselves. The ICFAs allow developers to defer payments until final plat approval or sale of the subdivision. As discussed in “Business—Our Unregulated Businesses—ICFAs,” we receive fees on an ongoing basis for the services we provide under these agreements, which include:
• providing “will serve” letters for the provision of utility services to the property;
• including the landowner’s property in an expanded CC&N;
• obtaining all necessary regulatory permits;
• executing line and main extension agreements with developers;
• developing master utility plans;
• providing financing for the provision of infrastructure in advance of and with no guarantee of customer connections; and
• providing construction services for water and wastewater treatment facilities.
ICFA fees represent an approximation of the interest and capitalized interest carrying costs associated with our financing, planning and managing the provision of infrastructure for the benefit of the landowner. The ICFAs provide that no portion of the fees collected represents a payment of principal or a contribution or advance to the utilities.
Contracted Fees.  The following table sets forth ICFA amounts at time of execution byappropriate test year for each geographic region. The amounts shown represent the contractual face value of fees before U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) escalation provisions for projected buildout in areas that have been certificated or in which CC&Ns are pending.
                     
  2007  2006  2005  2004  Total 
  (In thousands) 
 
Maricopa region $  $193,092  $441,681  $83,495  $718,268 
West Valley region  437,500   68,046   15,105      520,651 
East Eloy region  24,574            24,574 
                     
  $462,074  $261,138  $456,786  $83,495  $1,263,493 
Basis of Fees.  ICFA fees are charged at anagreed-upona future rate per equivalent development unit (EDU), or single family lot, based on final zoning. The number of EDUs per acre for commercial, multi-family and industrial properties is typically 4.0, ranging from 3.5 EDUs per acre for residential to 4.8 EDUs per acre for commercial. The following table sets forth the number of EDUs projected by ICFAs in active negotiation and under contract.
                 
  Maricopa  W. Valley  E. Eloy  Total 
 
In active negotiations  20,160   12,843      33,003 
Under contract  219,725   106,672   4,900   331,297 
                 
Total  239,885   119,515   4,900   364,300 
Collection of Fees.  A portion of the fee is typically collected once the property zoning is approved and the ICFA is executed, with additional portions being collected at various milestones of development. Contractual milestone amounts represent interim payments based on pre-established milestones. The most commonlyagreed-upon development milestone is reached when our utility has installed lines to predefined points near the development and development plans are continuing to progress. Final payments are generally


35

case. See “—Recent Rate Case Activities.”


received at time of final plat approval or sale of subdivision and are recorded as deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheet. For financial reporting purposes, ICFA revenue is recognized when water meters are installed and service begins to a particular lot. As ICFA fees are collected over time, increases in the amount of ICFA fees collected relative to face value are generally based on increases in the CPI plus 2%.
The following table sets forth cash received from ICFA contracts by year for various stages of development.
                     
  2007  2006  2005  2004  Total 
  (In thousands) 
 
Upon execution $  $607  $  $  $607 
Upon interim contractual milestones  906   13,103   540   75   14,624 
Upon final plat or sale of subdivision  3,752   12,986   19,851   4,950   41,539 
                     
  $4,658  $26,696  $20,391  $5,025  $56,770 
Compliance with Environmental, Health and Safety Standards
Our water and wastewater operations are also subject to extensive United States federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment, health and safety, the quality of the water we deliver to our customers, water allocation rights and the manner in which we collect, treat and discharge wastewater. We are also required to obtain various environmental permits from regulatory agencies for our operations. The ACCArizona Corporation Commission also sets conditions and standards for the water and wastewater services we deliver. We incur substantial costs associated with compliance with environmental, health and safety and water quality regulation. See “Business—Regulation” for additional information.

Environmental, health and safety and water quality regulations are complex and change frequently, and they have tended to become more stringent over time. As newer or stricter standards are introduced, they could increase our operating expenses. We would generally expect to recover expenses associated with compliance for environmental, health and safety standards, but this recovery may be affected by regulatory lag.

Economic Environment

The growth of our customer base depends almost entirely on the success of developers in developing residential and commercial properties within our service areas. Real estate development is a cyclical industry and the growth rate of development, especially residential development, since 2006, both nationally and in Arizona has been below historical rates. In addition, development in our service areas is contingent upon construction or acquisition of major public improvements, such as arterial streets, drainage facilities, telephone and electrical facilities, recreational facilities, street lighting and local in-tract improvements (e.g., site grading). Many of these improvements are built by municipalities with public financing, and municipal resources and access to capital may not be sufficient to support development in areas of rapid population growth.

See “Risk Factors—Our growth depends significantly on increased residential and commercial development in our service areas, and if developers or builders are unable to complete additional residential and commercial projects, our revenue may not increase” and “Risk Factors—A deep or prolonged slowdown of the development process and growth rate within the various developments in our service areas could materially and adversely affect the growth of our customer base and revenues” for additional information.

Infrastructure Investment

Capital expenditures for infrastructure investment are a component of the rate base on which our regulated utility subsidiaries are allowed to earn an equity return. Capital expenditures for infrastructure provide a basis for earnings growth by expanding our “used and useful” rate base, which is a component of its permitted return on investment and revenue requirement. We are generally able to recover a rate of return on these capital expenditures (return on equity and debt), together with debt service and certain operating costs, through the rates we charge.

We have made significant capital investments in our territories within the last twelve years, and because the infrastructure is new, we do not expect significant capital, either for growth or to maintain the existing infrastructure, to be required in the near term. Nevertheless, we will repair and replace existing infrastructure as needed. We need to make non-growth capital investments on an ongoing basis to comply with existing and new regulations, to renew treatment and network assets as they age, to enhance system reliability, and to provide security and quality of service. The need for continuous investment can present a challenge due to the potential for regulatory lag in rate increases described above. See “—Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—Economic and Environmental Utility Regulation.”

Production and Treatment Costs

Our water and wastewater services require significant production inputsresources and therefore result in significant production costs. Although we are permitted to recover these costs through the rates we charge, regulatory lag can decrease our margins and earnings if production costs or other operating expenses increase significantly before we are able to recover them through increased rates. Our most significant production costs include labor, chemicals used to treat water and wastewater, and power which is used to operate pumps and other equipment. Power and chemical costs are highly volatile and all of our production costs have increased in recent years. Wecan be volatile. However, we employ a variety of technologies and methodologies to reduceminimize costs and maximize operational efficiencies. See “Business—Operations.”

Additionally, with our Total Water Management approach, whereby we maximize the direct beneficial reuse of recycled water, we can realize significant treatment costs and power savings because smaller volumes of water are required for potable use. Many utilities require that all water be treated to potable standards irrespective of use. Total Water Management focuses on the right water for the right use. Potable water is needed for consumption and recycled water is acceptable for non-potable uses such as irrigation and toilet flushing. Non-potable water does not need to be treated for commonly occurring and regulated constituents such as arsenic, or for other current or future human consumption health-based contaminants.

Weather and Seasonality

Our ability to meet the existing and future water demands of our customers depends on an adequate supply of water. Drought, overuse of sources of water, the protection of threatened species or habitats or other factors may limit the availability of ground and surface water. Also, customer usage of water is affected by weather conditions, particularly during the summer.

Our water systems generally experience higher demand in the summer due to the warmer temperatures and increased usage by customers for lawn irrigation and other outdoor uses. SummerHowever, summer weather that is cooler andor wetter than average generally serves to suppresssuppresses customer water demand and can have a downward effect on our operating revenue and operating income. Conversely, when weather conditions are extremely dry, our business may be affected by government-issued drought-related warnings and/or water usage restrictions that would artificially lower customer demand and reduce our operating revenue.


36


The limited geographic diversity of our service areas could make ourthe results of our operations more sensitive to the effect of local weather extremes.extremes The Phoenix metropolitan area has experienced more thansecond and third quarters of the year are generally those in which water services revenue and wastewater services revenue are highest. Accordingly, interim results should not be considered representative of the results of a decade-long patternfull year.

Access to and Quality of below normal precipitationWater Supply

In many areas of Arizona (including certain areas that is expected to continue. Despite these record drought conditions, the Phoenix metropolitan area continues to maintain sufficientwe service), water supplies are limited and, in some cases, current usage rates exceed sustainable levels for certain water resources. We currently rely predominantly (and are likely to continue to rely) on the pumping of groundwater and the generation and delivery of recycled water for non-potable uses to meet future demands in our service areas. At present, groundwater (and recycled water derived from groundwater) is the needsprimary water supply available to us. In addition, regulatory restrictions on the use of its residentsgroundwater and has not introduced mandatorythe development of groundwater wells, lack of available water use restrictions. However,rights, drought, overuse of local or regional sources of water, protection of threatened species or habitats or other factors, including climate change, may limit the availability of ground or surface water.

See “Risk Factors—Inadequate water and wastewater supplies could have a material adverse effect upon our ability to achieve the customer growth necessary to increase our revenues” and “Risk Factors—There is no guaranteed source of water” for additional information.

Recent Rate Case Activity

On September 15, 2010, the Arizona Corporation Commission issued Rate Decision No. 71878 for the rate cases filed in February 2009 for the following utilities: Santa Cruz, Palo Verde, Valencia Water Company, Water Utility of Greater Buckeye, Inc. (“Greater Buckeye”), Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. (“Greater Tonopah”) and Willow Valley Water Co., Inc. (“Willow Valley”). The Arizona Corporation Commission established new rates for the utilities resulting in approximately $9.6 million of additional annual revenues retroactive to August 1, 2010, including a phase-in of rates for Palo Verde on January 1, 2011 and January 1, 2012. The Arizona Corporation Commission established new rates based on connections during the 2008 test year for the recovery of reasonable costs incurred by the utilities. Such rate changes increased rates for water and wastewater services for all but one of our utilities, Greater Tonopah (for which rates were reduced), resulting in a collective overall 47% increase over previous rates.

On July 11, 2012, we filed rate applications with the Arizona Corporation Commission to adjust the revenue requirements for seven utilities. In August 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the Arizona Corporation Commission staff, the Residential Utility Consumers Office, the City of PhoenixMaricopa, and other parties to the rate case. The settlement required approval by the Arizona Corporation Commission’s commissioners before it could take effect. In February 2014, the rate case proceedings were completed and the Arizona Corporation Commission issued Rate Decision No. 74364, approving the settlement agreement. The collective rate increase included a 9.5% return on common equity which contributed to a 15% increase over revenue in 2011.

For our utilities, adjusting for the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company, the settlement provided for a collective aggregate revenue requirement increase of $4.0 million based on 2011 test year service connections, phased-in over time, with the first increase in January 2015 as follows (in thousands of dollars):

   Incremental Rate
Increases
   Cumulative Rate
Increases
 

2015

  $1,285    $1,285  

2016

   1,089     2,374  

2017

   335     2,709  

2018

   335     3,044  

2019

   335     3,379  

2020

   335     3,714  

2021

  $335    $4,049  

Whereas this phase-in of additional revenues was determined using a 2011 test year, to the extent that the number of active service connections has indicatedincreased and continues to increase from 2011 levels, the additional revenues will be greater than the amounts set forth above. On the other hand, if we experience declining usage per customer, we may not realize all of the anticipated revenues.

From 2003 to 2008, we entered into approximately 183 infrastructure coordination and financing agreements with developers and landowners covering approximately 275 square miles. Under these agreements, we have a contractual obligation to the developers and landowners to ensure physical capacity exists through our regulated utilities for water and wastewater to the landowner/developer when needed. We receive fees from the landowner/developer for undertaking these obligations that typically are a negotiated amount per planned equivalent dwelling unit for the specified development or parcel of land. Payments are generally due to us from the landowner/developer based on progress of the development, with a portion due upon signing of the agreement, a portion due upon completion of certain milestones, and the final payment due upon final plat approval or sale of the subdivision. The payments are non-refundable. Our investment can be considerable, as we phase-in the construction of facilities in accordance with a regional master plan, as opposed to a single development.

Prior to January 1, 2010, we accounted for funds received under infrastructure coordination and financing agreements as revenue once the obligations specified in the agreements were met. As these arrangements are with developers and not with the end water or wastewater customer, the timing of revenue recognition coincided with the completion of our performance obligations under the agreement with the developer and with our ability to provide fitted capacity for water and wastewater service to the applicable development or parcel through our regulated subsidiaries. In Rate Decision No. 71878 in 2010, the Arizona Corporation Commission imputed a reduction to our rate base for all amounts we collected under these agreements as the Commission deemed these payments to be contributions in aid of construction for rate making purposes. As a result of that decision, effective January 1, 2010, we changed our accounting policy for the accounting of infrastructure coordination and financing agreement funds and recorded these funds received as contributions in aid of construction. Thereafter, the infrastructure coordination and financing agreement-related contributions in aid of construction were amortized as a reduction of depreciation expense over the estimated depreciable life of the utility plant at the related utilities. The balance of infrastructure coordination and financing agreement related contributions in aid of construction, net of accumulated amortization, totaled approximately $64.1 million as of December 31, 2013.

Pursuant to Rate Decision No. 74364 in 2014, the Arizona Corporation Commission changed how infrastructure coordination and financing agreement funds would be characterized and accounted for going forward. Most notably, infrastructure coordination and financing agreement funds that we previously received would no longer be accounted for as contributions in aid of construction. These funds which were already received or which had become due prior to the date of Rate Decision No. 74364 would be accounted for in accordance with our infrastructure coordination and financing agreement revenue recognition policy that had been in place prior to Rate Decision No. 71878 in 2010. For infrastructure coordination and financing agreement funds to be received in the future, Rate Decision No. 74364 prescribes that 70% of these funds will be recorded as a hook-up fee liability, with the remaining 30% to be recorded as deferred revenue, to be accounted for in accordance with our infrastructure coordination and financing agreement revenue recognition policy. The decision includes a full reversal of the imputation of contributions in aid of construction associated with funds previously received under infrastructure coordination and financing agreements, as required in the previous rate case. This change effectively restored approximately $67 million of equity (comprised of a $51 million gain on regulatory order and a $16 million deferred tax asset valuation allowance reversal) and approximately $59 million in assets that can be included in our rate base.

We now account for the portion of future payments received under these agreements allocated to hook-up fee liability as contributions in aid of construction. However, from the regulator’s perspective, hook-up fees do not impact rate base until the related funds are expended. These funds are segregated in a separate bank account and used for plant. A hook-up fee liability, once established, will be relieved once the funds are used for the construction of plant. For facilities required under a hook-up fee or infrastructure coordination and financing agreement, we must first use the hook-up fee funds received, after which we may use debt or equity financing for the remainder of construction. The 30% deferred revenue portion of these fees is recognized as revenue once the obligations specified within the applicable infrastructure coordination and financing agreement are met.

We have agreed to not enter into any new infrastructure coordination and financing agreements, and instead will utilize hook-up fee tariffs, which have become an acceptable industry practice in Arizona. As part of the settlement, a hook-up fee tariff was established for each utility within the settlement. Existing infrastructure coordination and financing agreements will remain in place, but a portion (approximately 70%) of future payments to be received under the infrastructure coordination and financing agreements will be considered as hook-up fees, which are accounted for as contributions in aid of construction once expended on plant (i.e., hook-up fees will be recorded as a liability, but will only reduce rate base once such funds are expended on plant). The remaining approximate 30% of future infrastructure coordination and financing agreement payments will be recognized using the same income recognition accounting applied to infrastructure coordination and financing agreement funds already received, wherein such funds will be recorded as revenue or deferred revenue.

In addition to infrastructure coordination and financing agreements, we have various line extension agreements with developers and builders, whereby funds, water line extensions, or wastewater line extensions are provided to us by the developers and are considered refundable advances for construction. These advances in aid of construction are subject to refund by us to the developers through annual payments that are computed as a percentage of the total annual gross revenue earned from customers connected to utility services constructed under the agreement over a specified period. Upon the expiration of the agreements’ refunding period, the remaining balance of the advances in aid of construction becomes nonrefundable and at that time is considered contributions in aid of construction. Contributions in aid of construction are amortized as a reduction of depreciation expense over the estimated remaining life of the related utility plant. For rate-making purposes, an utility plant funded by advances in aid of construction and contributions in aid of construction is excluded from rate base. For the year ended December 31, 2014, we transferred $7.4 million of advances in aid of construction balances to contributions in aid of construction for amounts for which the refunding period had expired.

Recent Events

Stipulated Condemnation of the Operations and Assets of Valencia Water Company

On July 14, 2015, the Company closed the stipulated condemnation to transfer the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company with the City of Buckeye. Terms of the condemnation were agreed upon through a settlement agreement wherein the City of Buckeye acquired all the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company and assumed operations of the utility upon close. The City of Buckeye paid the Company $55.0 million at close, plus an additional $108,000 in working capital adjustments. The City of Buckeye will also pay a growth premium equal to $3,000 for each new water meter installed within Valencia Water Company’s prior service areas, for a 20-year period ending December 31, 2034, subject to a maximum payout of $45.0 million over the term of the agreement.

Pending Sale of Willow Valley

On March 23, 2015, the Company reached an agreement to sell the operations and assets of Willow Valley to EPCOR Water Arizona Inc. (“EPCOR”). Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, EPCOR will purchase all the operations, assets and rights used by Willow Valley to operate the utility system for approximately $2.4 million, subject to current rate base calculations and certain post-closing adjustments. The transaction is subject to final approval from the Arizona Corporation Commission.

Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC Settlement

We previously filed a claim against Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC and New World Properties, Inc for breach of the infrastructure coordination and financing agreements for their respective developments. In May 2011, we initiated a demand for arbitration and statement of claim against Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC and New World Properties, Inc. The arbitration panel found in our favor on almost all claims and ruled that we were entitled to approximately $4.2 million of infrastructure coordination and financing agreement fees, 15% per annum interest

totaling $2.0 million and recovery of one-third of the legal costs incurred in connection with the litigation. In August 2012, we received the monies due from New World Properties, Inc. totaling $2,044,000, consisting of $1,219,000 of past due infrastructure coordination and financing agreement fees, $719,000 of interest and $106,000 of reimbursed litigation costs. However, subsequent to the award, Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. In July 2013, the bankruptcy court ruled that Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC must cure its default in order to assume the infrastructure coordination and financing agreement, which would require full payment of past due infrastructure coordination and financing agreement fees, interest and reimbursement of legal costs by no later than March 21, 2014, stating that such value would be determined by the court at a future date. In October 2013, we entered into a settlement with Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC, wherein payment terms were set to serve as the basis of Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC’s bankruptcy plan of reorganization. Under the plan and settlement agreement that was approved by the court, we would receive monies due from Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC totaling $5,321,000, consisting of $2,802,000 of past due infrastructure coordination and financing agreement fees, $2,021,000 of interest (recorded within other income (expense) in our statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014) and $498,000 of reimbursed litigation costs, all of which was received during the first quarter of 2014.

Sale of Loop 303 Contracts

In September 2013, we entered into an agreement to sell certain wastewater facilities main extension agreements and offsite water management agreements, along with their related rights and obligations (which we refer to collectively as the “Loop 303 Contracts”), relating to the 7,000-acre territory within a portion of the western planning area of the City of Glendale, Arizona known as the “Loop 303 Corridor.” Pursuant to the agreement, we sold the Loop 303 Contracts to EPCOR for total proceeds of approximately $4.1 million ($3.1 million of which has been received as of September 30, 2015), which will be paid to us over a multi-year period. Receipt of the remaining proceeds will occur and be recorded as additional income over time as certain milestones are met between EPCOR and the developers/landowners of the Loop 303 Corridor. As part of the consideration, we agreed to complete certain engineering work required in the offsite water management agreements, which we completed in 2013, thereby satisfying our remaining obligations relating to the Loop 303 Contracts.

Sale of FATHOM™ Business

In June 2013, the Company sold its wholly-owned subsidiary, Global Water Management, LLC (“GWM”), to an investor group led by a private equity firm which specializes in the water industry. GWM owns and operates the FATHOM™ business. Initially developed to support and optimize our own utilities, we commercialized the FATHOM™ business in 2009 and marketed FATHOM™ as an integrated suite of technology-enabled services to municipally-owned utilities. We retain an approximate 8% interest in GWM at September 30, 2015. The services offered by FATHOM™ provide automation, cost savings and opportunities for increased revenues. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Sale of Global Water management, LLC” for additional information.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Non-GAAP Measures

This “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section contains references to “EBITDA” and Adjusted EBITDA. EBITDA is defined for the purposes of this management’s discussion and analysis as net income or loss before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA less the gain or loss related to non-recurring events. Management believes that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are useful supplemental measures of our operating performance and provide meaningful measures of overall corporate performance exclusive of our capital structure and the method and timing of expenditures associated with building and placing our systems. EBITDA is also presented because management believes that it is prepared to impose restrictions in future years if necessary. Water restrictions imposedfrequently used by local governments in the areas we serve may affect our regulated business regardlessinvestment analysts, investors and other interested parties as a measure of financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA is also presented because management believes that it provides a measure of our readinessrecurring core business.

However, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not recognized earnings measures under generally accepted accounting principles of the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP. Therefore, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to meet unrestricted customer demand.

similar measures presented by other issuers. Investors are cautioned that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an alternatives to net income or loss or other income statement data (which are determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP) as an indicator of our performance or as a measure of liquidity and cash flows. Management’s method of calculating EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may differ materially from the method used by other companies and accordingly, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

Segment Reporting

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing operating performance. In consideration of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 280, “Segment Reporting,” we are not organized around specific products and services, geographic regions or regulatory environments. The Company currently operates in one geographic region within the State of Arizona, wherein each operating utility operates within the same regulatory environment.

While we report revenue, disaggregated by service type, on the face of its statement of operations, the Company does not manage the business based on any performance measure at the individual revenue stream level. We do not have any customers that contribute more than 10% to the Company’s revenues or revenue streams. Additionally, the chief operating decision maker uses consolidated financial information to evaluate our performance, which is the same basis on which he communicates our results and performance to our board of directors. It is upon this consolidated basis from which he bases all significant decisions regarding the allocation of our resources on a consolidated level. Based on the information described above and in accordance with the applicable literature, management has concluded that we are currently organized and operated as one operating and reportable segment.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2014

For the year ended December 31, 2014, we recorded total revenues of $32.6 million, which was comprised of $18.1 million in water services, $14.1 million in wastewater and recycled water services and $371,000 in unregulated revenues. Total revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2014 totaled $7.9 million, which was comprised of $4.2 million in water services, $3.6 million in wastewater and recycled water services and $117,000 in unregulated revenue.

Total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 totaled $(22.2 million), which was comprised of $10.4 million in operations and maintenance expenses, $8.8 million in general and administrative expenses and $9.2 million in depreciation expenses.

Total operating expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2014 totaled $7.0 million, which was comprised of $2.6 million in operations and maintenance expenses, $2.2 million in general and administrative expenses and $2.3 million in depreciation expenses.

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $64.9 million, primarily due to the $50.7 million gain on regulatory order recorded as a result of Rate Decision No. 74364.

Net income for the three months ended December 31, 2014 was $839,000.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the YearsNine Months Ended December 31, 2007September 30, 2015 and 2006

2014

Operating Revenues

The following table summarizes our operatingthe Company’s revenues for the yearsnine months ended December 31, 2007September 30, 2015 and 2006.

         
  For the Year Ended December 31, 
Sources of Revenues
 2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
 
Water Service $11,972  $8,364 
Wastewater Service  5,714   4,527 
ICFAs  6,596   5,952 
Other  1,527   2,006 
         
  $25,809  $20,849 
         
Our operating2014 (in thousands of dollars):

   Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   2015   2014 

Water services

  $13,138    $13,831  

Wastewater and recycled water services

   11,243     10,561  

Unregulated revenues

   466     254  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

  $24,847    $24,646  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues increased $201,000, or 0.8%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2014. This increase is primarily the result of rate increases due to Rate Decision No. 74364 combined with continued connection growth, despite the revenue reduction associated with the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company. Adjusting for the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company by subtracting revenue from Valencia Water Company for all periods, revenue increased $5.0$1.4 million, or 24%6.9%, primarily from a decrease in precipitation resulting in higher usage of water, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to 2014 combined with the increase in rates due to Rate Decision No. 74364.

Water Services. Water services revenues decreased $693,000, or 5.0%, to $13.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared with $13.8 million in the same period in 2014.

Water service revenue based on consumption decreased $621,000, or 10.2%, from $20.8$6.1 million for 2006the nine months ended September 30, 2014 to $25.8$5.5 million for 2007 based primarily on newthe same period in 2015. The decrease in revenue was driven by a decrease of $673,000 in water service revenue related to the reduction in active water connections as described below.

a result of the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Service.Company and the associated decreased consumption for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Active water connections decreased 23.7% to 19,890 as of September 30, 2015 from 26,064 as of September 30, 2014. Water consumption decreased approximately 14.0% to a total of 1.9 billion gallons for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from a total of 2.2 billion gallons for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The decreased in active connections and consumption was primarily driven by the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company in the third quarter of 2015. Adjusting for the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company, consumption revenue remained relatively constant at $4.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively.

Water services revenue associated with the basic service charge decreased 1.1% to $7.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $7.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, due to the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company. Adjusting for the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company, basic revenue increased $478,000 or, 9.2%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared with the same period in 2014, reflecting growth in total active connections as well as an increase in rates due to Rate Decision No. 74364.

Wastewater and Recycled Water Services. Water serviceWastewater and recycled water services revenues increased $3.6 million,$682,000, or 43%6.5%, from $8.4$10.6 million for 2006the nine months ended September 30, 2014 to $12.0$11.2 million for 2007 due to 3,938 new service connections in our service areas.

Wastewater Service.  Wastewater service revenues increased $1.2 million, or 26%, from $4.5 million for 2006 to $5.7 million for 2007 due to 2,942 new wastewater service connections in our service areas. Wastewater service includes revenue from our sale of recycled water.
ICFAs.  ICFA revenue increased $644,000, or 11%, from $6.0 million for 2006 to $6.6 million for 2007 due to 5,915 new connections in our service areas covered by ICFAs.
Other Revenue.  Other operating revenue decreased $479,000, or 24%, from $2.0 million for 2006 to $1.5 million for 2007.the

nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to the number of active connections, which increased 2.5% to 17,748 as of September 30, 2015 compared to 17,310 as of September 30, 2014, as well as an increase in rates due to Rate Decision No. 74364.

Recycled water revenue, which is based on gallons delivered, increased 55.0% to approximately $392,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $253,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in volume of recycled water delivered combined with a decreaserate increase due to Rate Decision No. 74364. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, total volume of water delivered increased 11.3% to 491 million gallons compared to 442 million gallons for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Unregulated Revenues. Unregulated revenues, which are primarily rental fees derived from leases of space on a utility-owned communications tower and the imputed revenue resulting from our public-private partnership with the City of Maricopa, increased $212,000, or 83.5%, to $466,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $254,000 in meter sales, partiallythe nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in revenue was driven by an increase in infrastructure coordination and financing agreement-related imputed revenue resulting from our public-private partnership memorandum of understanding with the City of Maricopa starting in April 2014, wherein we agreed to offset by increased connection fees.

the cash payment of our license fee through December 31, 2015 for miscellaneous utility related services the City of Maricopa required from the Company. These commitments were previously finalized, and the associated license fees are being accounted for as unregulated revenue until the expiration of the agreement on December 31, 2015.

Operating Expenses

Our

The following table summarizes the Company’s operating expenses increased $7.4 million, or 54%, from $13.8 million for 2006 to $21.2 million for 2007. Operating expenses by major category were as follows:

         
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006 
  (In thousands) 
 
Operations and maintenance $2,637  $1,467 
General and administrative  9,974   6,754 
Depreciation and amortization  8,613   5,601 
         
Total $21,224  $13,822 
         


37

the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of dollars):


   Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   2015   2014 

Operations and maintenance

  $7,319    $7,855  

General and administrative

   5,891     6,610  

Gain on regulatory order

   —       (50,664

Depreciation

   6,526     6,926  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

  $19,736    $(29,273
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operations and maintenance.  Maintenance. Operations and maintenance costs, consisting of personnel costs, production costs (primarily chemicals and purchased power), maintenance costs, contract services, and property tax, increased $1.2 million,decreased $536,000, or 80%6.8%, in 2007the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to 2006. The cost of purchased power increased by $420,000,the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Personnel costs decreased $192,000, or 48%10.7%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $1.3 million; property tax increased by $320,000, or 128%, to $569,000 due to increased service connections; the cost of maintenance increased by $199,000, or 288%, due to an increase in our assets in service; and the cost of chemicals increased by $223,000, or 201%, to $334,000nine months ended September 30, 2014, primarily due to a decrease in personnel related to the chemicals usedcondemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company. As a result of the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company, personnel costs declined $201,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Utilities and power expense decreased $183,000, or 12.3%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Utilities and power expense decreased as a result of the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company. As a result of the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company, utilities and power expenses declined $186,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Contract services expense decreased $153,000, or 7.5%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Contract services decreased as a result of the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company combined with a reduction in arsenic treatmentdisposal expenses. As a result of the condemnation of the operations and chemicals usedassets of Valencia Water Company, fees paid to GWM for FATHOM™ service fees were reduced $125,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Disposal fees decreased $81,000, or 77.6%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Residual disposal declined due to the elimination of third party transportation expenses related to the transfer of certain disposal activities in-house combined with the elimination of bio-solid disposal fees, as we initiated direct land application of bio-solids in July 2014. Bio-solids are a by-product of our water reclamation process and were previously disposed of within a landfill. Currently, bio-solids are beneficially reused as fertilizer by an agricultural farmer who accepts the bio-solids at no cost.

Property taxes increased $69,000, or 4.3%, in the controlnine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Property taxes are calculated using a centrally valued property calculation, which derives property values based upon three-year historical average revenues of odors.

the Company. As revenues increase, property taxes will continue to increase.

General and administrative.Administrative. General and administrative costs include the day-to-day expenses of office operation, salaries and wages,operations, personnel costs, legal and other professional fees, insurance, rent and regulatory fees. These costs increased $3.2 million,decreased $719,000, or 48%10.9%, in 2007during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to 2006 duethe nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Personnel costs decreased $844,000, or 21.9%, to growth$3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $3.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Personnel costs decreased in relation to a decline in wage and bonus expense combined with a decrease in deferred compensation. Wage and bonus expense decreased $471,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 in relation to the completion of our operationsexecutive transition plan, wherein we no longer accrue and pay a salary and bonus to Mr. Hill and Ms. Bowers, who are currently directors of the Company, combined with $300,000 of cash bonus payments made in preparation for future growth, as well aslieu of phantom stock units (“PSUs”) in 2014 that did not occur in 2015. These payments were made to reduce the potential exposure to increased deferred compensation expense resulting from PSU re-measurement corresponding to an increase in share price offset by $591,000 in one-time bonus payouts in 2015.

On December 30, 2010, we adopted a phantom stock unit plan (the “PSU Plan”) authorizing the directors of the Company to issue PSUs to our bad debtemployees. The value of the PSUs issued under the plan tracks the performance of GWRC’s shares and gives rise to a right of the holder to receive a cash payment the value of which, on a particular date, will be the market value of the equivalent number of shares of GWRC at that date. The issuance of PSUs as a core component of employee compensation was intended to strengthen the alignment of interests between our employees and the shareholders of GWRC by linking their holdings and a portion of their compensation to the future value of the common shares of GWRC. The PSU Plan will remain in effect following the Reorganization Transaction and this offering, provided that the value of the PSUs will track the performance of the Company’s common stock going forward.

On December 30, 2010, 350,000 PSUs were issued to members of management, with an initial value of approximately $2.6 million. PSUs are accounted for as liability compensatory awards under ASC 710,Compensation—General, rather than as equity awards. The PSU awards are re-measured each period based on the present value of the benefits expected to be provided to the employee upon vesting, which benefits are based on GWRC’s share price multiplied by the number of units. The present value of the benefits is recorded as expense in the Company’s financial statements over the related vesting period. The December 30, 2010 PSUs vested at the end of four years from $63,000the date of their issuance. There is no exercise price attached to PSU awards.

As of December 31, 2014, 303,333 of these PSUs remain outstanding. The value of the PSUs were paid to the holders in January 2015.

In January 2012, 135,079 additional PSUs were issued to nine members of management as a reward for 2006performance in 2011. The PSUs issued to $367,000management vest ratably over 12 consecutive quarters beginning January 1, 2012 and are accounted for 2007,as liability compensatory awards similar to the PSUs issued in December 2010. These PSUs are re-measured each period and a liability recorded equal to GWRC’s closing share price on the Toronto Stock Exchange on the period end date multiplied by the number of units vested. As of December 31, 2014, 8,491 of these PSUs remain outstanding.

During the first quarter of 2013, 76,492 PSUs were issued to nine members of management as a reward for performance in 2012. The PSUs issued to management vest ratably over 12 consecutive quarters beginning January 1, 2013 and are accounted for as liability compensatory awards similar to the PSUs issued in December 2010 and January 2012. These PSUs will be re-measured each period and a liability will be recorded equal to GWRC’s closing share price on the period end date multiplied by the number of units vested. As of December 31, 2014, 27,393 of these PSUs remain outstanding.

During the first quarter of 2014, 8,775 PSUs were issued to three members of management as a reward for performance in 2013. These PSUs vest ratably over 12 consecutive quarters beginning January 1, 2014. As of December 31, 2014, 3,341 of these PSUs remain outstanding.

In the third quarter of 2013, the Company granted 100,000 SARs to a key executive of the Company. These SARs vest ratably over 16 quarters from the grant date and give the employee the right to receive a cash payment amounting to the difference between the C$2.00 per share exercise price and the closing price of GWRC’s common shares on the exercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of C$2.00 per share. The exercise price was determined by taking the weighted average share price of the five days prior to July 1, 2013. As of September 30, 2015, 92,500 of these SARs remain outstanding. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, $37,000, was paid to the holder for vested SARs.

In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company granted 100,000 SARs to a newly hired officer of the Company. These SARs vest ratably over 16 quarters from the grant date and give the employee the right to receive a cash payment amounting to the difference between the C$3.38 per share exercise price and the closing price of GWRC’s common shares on the exercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of C$3.38 per share. The exercise price was determined by taking the weighted average share price of the 30 days prior to November 14, 2013. As of September 30, 2015, 100,000 of these SARs remain outstanding.

In the first quarter of 2015, the Company granted 299,000 SARs to seven members of management. These SARs vest ratably over 16 quarters from the grant date and give the employee the right to receive a cash payment amounting to the difference between the C$5.35 per share exercise price and the closing price of GWRC’s common shares on the exercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of C$5.35 per share. The exercise price was determined to be the fair market value of one share of stock on the grant date of February 11, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, 299,000 of these SARs remain outstanding.

In the second quarter of 2015, the Company granted 300,000 SARs to two key executives of the Company. These SARs vest over 16 quarters, vesting 20% per year for the first three years, with the remainder vesting in year four. The SARs give the employee the right to receive a cash payment amounting to the difference between the C$6.44 per share exercise price and the closing price of GWRC’s common shares on the exercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of C$6.44 per share. The exercise price was determined to be the fair market value of one share of stock on the grant date of May 8, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, 300,000 of these SARs remain outstanding. See “—JOBS Act Accounting Election and Other Matters” for information regarding the change in valuation methodology of outstanding SARs to be effected with the Company’s transition to being a public company.

Deferred compensation decreased $605,000 primarily as a result of the reduction in total PSUs outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Deferred compensation is calculated based upon the current period change in share price, multiplied by the number of outstanding PSUs. In addition to the decrease in units outstanding, the U.S. Dollar adjusted share price increased $0.42 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to an increase of $1.02 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, which we attribute principallyalso contributed to general economic conditionsthe reduction in deferred compensation. For additional information on these PSUs, see “Executive Compensation—Long Term Incentive Awards—Phantom Stock Units.”

Regulatory expenses increased $121,000, or 224.1%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in regulatory expense was due to amortization of deferred rate case costs incurred during the latest rate case that resulted in Rate Decision No. 74364. Amortization of the deferred rate case costs began in January 2015 in conjunction with the onset of new rates.

Professional fees decreased $48,000, or 4.4%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as certain accounting and legal fees related to Rate Decision No. 74364 were incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 that did not occur in 2015.

Board compensation increased $168,000, or 152.8%, to $279,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Board compensation primarily increased as a result of the completion of our market.

executive transition plan, wherein Mr. Hill’s and Ms. Bowers’ compensation is now recorded as board compensation rather than as salary. Additionally, compensation increased due to an increase in the number of outstanding deferred phantom units (“DPUs”) held by directors combined with appreciation related to an increase in share price.

Gain on Regulatory Order. The $50.7 million gain on regulatory order recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 represents the benefit to the Company’s periodic earnings as a result of Rate Decision No. 74364, which concluded that infrastructure coordination and financing agreement funds received historically would no longer be recorded as contributions in aid of construction.

Depreciation and amortization.  Our consolidated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation expense increased $3.0 million,decreased by $400,000, or 54%5.8%, from $5.6to $6.5 million for 2006the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $8.6$6.9 million for 2007.the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increase wasdecrease of depreciation expense is primarily due to the increase incondemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company combined with some of our utility plant in serviceassets reaching their full useful life and, therefore, having been fully depreciated.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income totaled $37.2 million for the full yearnine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $4.6 million of amortization of intangible assets purchased in mid-2006.

net expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Other income (expense)
Interest primarily consisted of the gain on the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company, interest expense, the primary component of ourloss on equity method investment and other income. The $41.9 million change in other income (expense), increased $2.9is primarily attributed to the $43.1 million or 199%, from $1.4 million for 2006 to $4.3 million for 2007. The increase was primarily due to increased borrowings to fund capital programs, higher interest ratesgain recorded in 2007 and accretion2015 with the condemnation of the WMC purchase liability. This increaseoperations and assets of Valencia Water Company combined with $399,000 of income attributed to the Valencia Water Company earn out, wherein we receive $3,000 for each new meter installed within our prior service area over a 20-year period, beginning January 1, 2015. The gain on the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company was partially offset by an increase in$2.0 million of interest income from $32,000related to the Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC litigation recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, which was not recorded in 2015. See “—Recent Events—Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC Settlement” for 2006additional information.

Loss on equity method investment decreased by $262,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $380,000 for 2007 primarilythe nine months ended September 30, 2014 due to interest received onthe reduction in the Company’s share of ongoing losses, which declined as a reserve fund establishedresult of the recapitalization of Fathom Water Management Holdings, LLP (the

“FATHOM Partnership”) in connection with our Series 2006 tax exempt bonds.

November 2014. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Sale of Global Water Management, LLC.”

Income Tax Benefit (Expense)

Income tax expense (benefit)

Ourincreased to $20.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to a benefit of $16.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The change in income tax expense is driven by the $20.2 million tax expense related to the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to a $16.1 million tax benefit related to the reversal of substantially all the deferred tax asset valuation allowance for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as a result of Rate Decision No. 74364.

Effective June 2012 and through December 31, 2013, the Company maintained a full income tax valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets. As a result of the valuation allowance, effectively no income tax expense or benefit was recorded during that period. Accordingly, income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2013 was minimal.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, as a result of the additional revenues expected to be provided by Rate Decision No. 74364, as well as other factors, the Company performed an evaluation of its deferred tax assets and determined that sufficient evidence existed such that the majority of the Company’s deferred tax assets would be utilized in the future. Accordingly, the Company reversed substantially all of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance previously recorded, resulting in a $16.1 million income tax benefit. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded an $868,000 income tax benefit increased $664,000, or 90%, from anrelated to current year losses.

Net Income

The Company’s net income tax benefit of $740,000 for 2006 to an income tax benefit of $1.4totaled $21.4 million for 2007.the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to net income of $65.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The increasechange in net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to net income as of September 30, 2014 is primarily dueattributed to increased intercompany interest expense at Global Water, Inc., which created an operating loss for tax purposes.

Income from discontinued operations
Our income from discontinued operations increased from $267,000 for 2006 to $4.1 million for 2007. The increase primarily represents the $6.5a $50.7 million gain on saleregulatory order from the infrastructure coordination and financing agreements and contributions in aid of construction reversal as part of the utility2014 rate case settlement, $16.1 million release of income tax asset valuation allowance and interest income of $2.0 million related to the Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC litigation recorded in 2014 that did not occur in 2015. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded a gain of $43.1 million in relation to the condemnation of the operations and assets of Cave CreekValencia Water Company net of tax.
a $20.2 million tax liability associated with the transaction. Additionally, the Company recognized approximately $296,000 of income for proceeds related to the sale of Loop 303 Contracts along with a $176,000 loss in conjunction with the classification of Willow Valley’s assets as held for sale, which did not occur in 2014.

Net incomeEBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

Net income from continuing operations decreased $4.3 million, or 68%, from $6.3

EBITDA totaled $55.3 million for 2006the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $2.0$62.6 million for 2007.the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The decreasechange in EBITDA for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2014 is primarily attributed to the result$50.7 million gain on regulatory order recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and the $43.1 million gain on the condemnation of increased operating expenses to support growth, depreciation,the operations and interest expense. Our net income including results from discontinued operations decreased $515,000, or 8%, from $6.6assets of Valencia Water Company recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Adjusted EBITDA totaled $12.3 million for 2006the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $6.1$10.4 million for 2007.


38


Comparison of Results of Operations for December 31, 2006 and 2005
Operating Revenues
The following table summarizes our operating revenue for the yearsnine months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:
         
  For the Year Ended December 31 
Sources of Revenues
 2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
Water Service $8,364  $3,780 
Wastewater Service  4,527   2,732 
ICFAs  5,952   4,347 
Other  2,006   2,084 
         
  $20,849  $12,943 
         
Our operating revenues increased $7.9 million, or 61%, from $12.9 million for 2005 to $20.8 million for 2006 based primarily on new service connections as described below.
Water Service.  Water service revenues increased $4.6 million, or 121%, from $3.8 million for 2005 to $8.4 million for 2006.September 30, 2014. The increase was attributable to 9,569 new connections in our service areas, which includes 6,256 service connections added through our acquisition of West Maricopa Combine Inc. in July of 2006.
Wastewater Service.  Wastewater service revenues increased $1.8 million, or 66%, from $2.7 million for 2005 to $4.5 million for 2006 due primarily to 3,079 new connections in our service areas.
ICFAs.  ICFA revenue increased $1.6 million, or 37%, from $4.3 million for 2005 to $6.0 million for 2006 due to 6,101 new connections in our service areas covered by ICFAs.
Other Revenue.Other operating revenueAdjusted EBITDA was relatively unchanged, decreasing 78,000, or 4%, from $2.1 million for 2005 to $2.0 million for 2006.
Operating expenses
Our operating expenses increased $6.3 million or 83%, from $7.5 million for 2005 to $13.8 million for 2006. Operating expenses by major category were as follows:
         
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
Operations and maintenance $1,467  $792 
General and administrative  6,754   3,413 
Depreciation and amortization  5,601   3,338 
         
Total $13,822  $7,543 
         
Operations and maintenance.  Operations and maintenance costs increased by $675,000, or 85%, in 2006 compared to 2005. The cost of purchased power increased by $528,000, or 152%, to $875,000 and property tax increased by $139,000, or 125%, to $250,000 due to increased service connections. Remaining expenses in this category were relatively unchanged from year to year.
General and administrative.  General and administrative costs include the day-to-day expenses of office operation, salaries and wages, legal and other professional fees, insurance and regulatory fees. These costs increased by $3.3 million, or 98%, in 2006 compared to 2005 due to incremental costs associated with increased connections and sales volumes from organic growth in our service territories and the acquisition of WMC in July 2006.


39


Depreciation and amortization.  Our depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.3 million, or 67%, from $3.3 million for 2005 to $5.6 million for 2006. The increase was primarily due to increased property placed in service as a result of growth in customers in our regulated businesses and the acquisition of WMC in July 2006.
Other income (expense)
Interest expense, the primary component of our other income (expense), increased $1.4 million from 2005 to 2006 due to additional borrowings to fund capital programs.
Income tax expense (benefit)
Our income tax benefit increased $740,000 from $0 for 2005, to $740,000 for 2006. The increase was primarily due to accretion of the WMC purchase liability and increased intercompany interest expense at Global Water, Inc., which created an operating loss for tax purposes.
Income from discontinued operations
Our income from discontinued operations increased from $72,000 in 2005 to $267,000 in 2006 primarily due to the acquisitionrate increase and a general reduction in general and administrative expenses, as discussed above.

A reconciliation of Cave Creek Water Company in March 2005. The utility assets of Cave Creek Water Company were sold in 2007.

Net income
Net income from continuing operations increased $904,000, or 17%, from $5.4 million for 2005Income to $6.3 million for 2006. The increase is the result of increased revenues from the acquisition of West Maricopa Combine, connection growth in our regulated businesses, and revenue growth from ICFAs. Our net income increased $1.1 million, or 20%, from $5.5 million for 2005 to $6.6 million for 2006.
EBITDA
In addition to the above, we consider EBITDA as a supplemental measure of our results of operations. We define EBITDA as net income or loss before interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization. The calculation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA in the reconciliationnine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 is as follows (in thousands of net income or loss to EBITDA are shown in “—Non-GAAP Measure” beginning on page 45 of this prospectus. We include the presentation of EBITDA and discuss the reasons for our use of EBITDA as a supplemental measure of our results of operations under “—Non-GAAP Measure.”
dollars):

   Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   2015   2014 

Net Income

  $21,393    $65,770  

Income tax expense (benefit)

   20,897     (16,477

Interest income

   (8   (64

Interest expense

   6,496     6,487  

Depreciation

   6,526     6,926  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

EBITDA(1)

   55,304     62,642  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gain on regulatory order

     (50,664

Sierra Negra Ranch interest income

     (2,021

Gain on condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia

   (43,074  

Writedown of Willow Valley assets held for sale

   176    

Gain on sale of Loop 303 Contracts

   (296  

Equity investment losses

   212     474  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA(2)

  $12,322    $10,431  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(1)EBITDA is defined as income or loss before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is not a recognized measure under U.S. GAAP and does not have a standardized meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP. Therefore, EBITDA may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. The table above reconciles net income to EBITDA. See “—Cautionary Statements Regarding Non-GAAP Measures” for further information regarding EBITDA.
(2)Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA less the gain or loss related to non-recurring events, and includes an adjustment for the gain on the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company, loss on assets held for sale, gain on sale of Loop 303 Contracts and loss on equity investment for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Adjustments for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 include an adjustment for the gain on regulatory order, gain on Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC litigation proceeds and loss on equity investment. Adjusted EBITDA is not a recognized measure under U.S. GAAP and does not have a standardized meaning prescribed by U.S. GAAP. Therefore, Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. The table above reconciles EBITDA to Adjusted EBITDA. See “—Cautionary Statements Regarding Non-GAAP Measures” for further information regarding EBITDA.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our business is capital intensive and requires considerable capital resources. A portion of these

The Company’s capital resources are provided by internally generated cash flows from operations including ICFAs. In addition we obtain funds from external sources, including financing under industrial development authority tax exempt bond offeringsas well as debt and through bank borrowings. Our access to external financing on reasonable terms depends on our credit ratings and current business conditions, including that ofequity financing. Additionally, the water utility industry in general. If these conditions deteriorate to the extent that we no longer have access to the capital markets at reasonable terms, we have access to a $60 million revolving credit facility that we currently utilize to support our short-term liquidity requirements. See “—Cash Flows from Financing Activities—Wells Fargo Revolving Credit Facility.”

In addition, ourCompany’s regulated utility subsidiaries receive advances and contributions from customers, home builders and real estate developers to partially fund construction necessary to extend service to new areas. Advances for construction are refundable for limited periods, which vary in accordance with ACC regulations, as new customers begin to receive service or other contractual obligations are fulfilled. Amounts which are no longer refundable are reclassified to contributions in aid of construction. Utility plant funded by advances and


40


contributions is excluded from rate base. Generally, we depreciate contributed property and amortize contributions in aid of construction at the composite rate of the related property.
We use ourThe Company uses its capital resources including cash, to (i) to:

fund operating costs;

fund capital requirements, including construction expenditures, (ii) pay maturingexpenditures;

make debt (iii) payand interest payments; and (iv) 

invest in new and existing ventures. We spend a significant amount of cash on construction projects that have a long-term return on investment. Additionally, we

The Company’s utility subsidiaries operate in rate-regulated environments in which the amount of new investment recovery may be limited, and wherelimited; such recovery takeswill take place over an extended period of time as ourbecause recovery through rate increases is subject to regulatory lag. See “Business—Regulation.”

As a result of these factors,September 30, 2015, the Company had notable near-term cash expenditure obligations. Most significantly, the Company has approximately $8.9 million of debt interest and as is typical for regulated water utilities, our working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, as of December 31, 2007, is in a net deficit position.

We expectprincipal payments due before September 30, 2016. While specific facts and circumstances could change, we believe that we will need to access debthave sufficient cash on hand and equity capital markets to meet the balance of our growth capital expenditure requirements. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully access such markets on favorable terms orgenerate sufficient cash flows to meet our required debt service and operating cash flow requirements as well as remain in compliance with our debt covenants until at all.
least December 31, 2016.

Cash Flows fromProvided By Operating Activities

Cash flows fromprovided by operating activities have been a reliable, steady source of cash flow, sufficientare used for operating needs and to meet operating requirements and a portion of our capital expenditure requirements. OurThe Company’s future cash flows from operating activities will be affected by economic utility regulation, infrastructure investment, growth in service connections, customer usage of water, ICFAs, compliance with environmental health and safety standards, production costs, and weather and seasonality. Operating cash flows can be negatively affected by changes in our rate regulatory environments.

The following table provides a summary of

For the major items affecting our cash flows from operating activities foryear ended December 31, 2014, the periods indicated:

             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
Net income $6,069  $6,584  $5,485 
Add (subtract):            
Non-cash operating activities(1)  3,295   6,581   3,721 
Changes in working capital(2)  (2,126)  4,073   (2,917)
Changes in noncurrent assets and liabilities(3)  (1,347)  19,545   17,146 
             
Net cash provided by operating activities $5,891  $36,783  $23,435 
             
(1)Includes depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, (gain) loss on sale of assets, provision for deferred income taxes, and provision for losses on utility accounts receivable.
(2)Changes in working capital include changes to accounts receivable and accrued utility revenue, ICFA fees receivable, other current assets, accounts payable, taxes accrued (including federal income), interest accrued, and other current liabilities.
(3)Changes in deferred revenue and prepaid ICFA fees received upon execution and contractual milestones.
OurCompany’s net cash provided by operating activities increased $13.4totaled $11.6 million.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company’s net cash provided by operating activities totaled $5.2 million from $23.4compared to $12.3 million for 2005 to $36.8the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The $7.0 million for 2006 and decreased $30.9 million to $5.9 million for 2007. The increasechange in 2006 was due to increases in net income adjusted for non-cashcash from operating activities decreases in working capital and increases in ICFA fees collected that we defer recognizing as revenue until water meters are installed and service begins to a particular lot. The decrease in 2007 was primarily due to increasesdriven by $2.8 million of infrastructure coordination and financing agreement funds and $2.0 million of interest received in working capitalthe nine months ended September 30, 2014 in connection with the settlement of the Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC litigation. Additionally, cash from operations was affected by a $1.4 million payout of accrued PSU expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Further, operating cash flows are affected by the timing of the recording and decreases in ICFA fees. The increase in working capital was primarily due to reductions in distributionssettlement of accounts payable and accounts payable.


41

other accrued liabilities.


Cash Flows fromProvided By (Used In) Investing Activities
Cash flows used in investing activities were as follows for

For the periods indicated:

             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
Capital expenditures $(67,842) $(51,172) $(27,693)
Acquisitions  (3,505)  (15,836)  (5,969)
Other investing activities, net(1)  19,273   (350)  50 
             
Net cash flows used in investing activities $(52,074) $(67,358) $(33,612)
             
(1)Includes proceeds from discontinued operations, proceeds from the sale of assets, and deposits.
Cash used in investing activities increased $33.8 million from $33.6 million for 2005 to $67.4 million for 2006 as we increased investment in acquired regulated infrastructure projects. Whileyear ended December 31, 2014, the amount invested in capital expenditures increased again in 2007 as compared to 2006, our overallCompany’s net cash used in investing activities decreased $15.3 million to $52.1 million for 2007. The primary reason for this decrease wastotaled $1.4 million.

For the inflow of $19.5 million ofnine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company’s net cash relating to the disposition of the utility assets of Cave Creek Water Company.

Cash used in investing activities will continuetotaled $52.7 million compared to rise$857,000 provided by investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. The $53.6 million change was primarily driven by the $55.2 million in proceeds received in relation to the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company and $296,000 in proceeds from the sale of Loop 303 Contracts received during 2008 asthe nine months ended September 30, 2015. These increases were partially offset by a $1.1 million increase in capital expenditures are expectedcombined with the $518,000 net change in cash advanced to be approximately $20 million during 2008. We intendGWRC for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to zero for the same period in 2014.

The Company continues to invest capital strategicallyprudently in its existing, core service areas where we arethe Company is able to deploy our TWMits Total Water Management model and increase ouras service connection base.connections grow. This may include strategic acquisitionsincludes any required maintenance capital expenditures and the construction of new water and wastewater treatment and delivery facilities. OurThe Company’s projected capital expenditures and other investments are subject to periodic review and revision to reflect changes in economic conditions and other factors.

Cash Flows fromUsed In Financing Activities

Our

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company’s net cash used in financing activities includetotaled $5.6 million.

For the issuancenine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company’s net cash used in financing activities totaled $47.8 million compared to $3.9 million, respectively. The $43.9 million increase in cash used in

financing activities was principally driven by $21.3 million in cash used to retire our term loan with MidFirst bank in July 2015 combined with an increase of long-term and short-term debt on$24.2 million in the terms summarized below.

Series 2006 and 2007 Tax-Exempt Bonds
We are obligated with respectamount of dividends paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to $36,495,000 ofthe nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Tax Exempt Bonds

The Company issued tax-exempt revenue bonds and $54,135,000 of tax-exempt revenue bonds, issued in 2006 and 2007, respectively, by thethrough The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima (Arizona).in the amount of $36,495,000 on December 28, 2006; $53,624,000, net of a discount of $511,000, on November 19, 2007; and $24,550,000 on October 1, 2008. The development authority has loanedSeries 2006, 2007 and 2008 bonds have interest payable semiannually on the proceedsfirst of June and December. Recurring payments of principal are payable annually on the first of December for the Series 2006, 2007 and 2008 Bonds. Proceeds from these bonds to us to finance thewere used for qualifying costs of acquiring, constructing and equipping the water and wastewater conveyance and treatment facilities to be owned and utilized by us or certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries. We also used bond proceeds to establish separate debt service reserve funds for each seriessubsidiaries, Palo Verde and Santa Cruz. The Company has not granted any deed of bonds and to pay certain coststrust, mortgage, or other lien on property of issuing the bonds.

The 2006 bonds consist of term bonds maturing on December 1, 2017, December 1, 2022 and December 1, 2032, and bear interest at rates ranging from 5.45% to 5.75% per annum. The 2006 bonds are subject to mandatory annual sinking fund redemption in varying amounts on December 1 beginning in 2010, 2018 and 2023, respectively. Except in the case of certain extraordinary events (one of which is our completion of an initial public offering), the 2006 bonds are not subject to optional redemption at our election until December 1, 2017Santa Cruz or after, but may then be redeemed in whole or in part at par plus accrued interest. If notification of a “determination of taxability” is received with respect to the 2006 bonds, we are obligated to cause such bonds to be redeemed within 180 days, at a redemption price equal to 103% of the principal amount redeemed, plus accrued interest.
The 2007 bonds were issued as term bonds maturing on December 1, 2013 and December 1, 2037, and bear interest at rates ranging from 5.50% to 6.55% per annum. The 2007 bonds are subject to mandatory annual sinking fund redemption in varying amounts on December 1, beginning in 2011 and 2014, respectively. Except in the case of certain extraordinary events (one of which is our completion of an initial public


42


offering), the 2007 bonds maturing in 2013 are not subject to optional redemption. We have the option of redeeming the 2007 bonds maturing in 2037, in whole or in part, on or after December 1, 2017, at a redemption price of par plus accrued interest. If notification of a “determination of taxability” is received with respect to the 2007 bonds, we are obligated to cause such bonds to be redeemed within 180 days, at a redemption price equal to 103% of the principal amount redeemed, plus accrued interest.
The loan agreement relating to our Series 2006 and Series 2007 revenue bonds imposes an annual minimum debt service coverage test on us. The bond loan agreement also prohibits us from incurring additional long-term indebtedness unless no default or event of default under the loan agreement exists (or would be caused by such incurrence) and unless we meet, on a pro forma basis, a minimum ratio of income available for debt service to maximum annual debt service on our long-term indebtedness. This restriction does not limit our ability to incur indebtedness under our current revolving credit facility or to incur short-term indebtedness or subordinated indebtedness meeting the requirements of the bond documents. We are also prohibited from creating or permitting encumbrances or liens on our assets, other than those specifically permitted (which include liens in favor of our senior credit facility bank).
Both the 2006 and the 2007Palo Verde. These bonds are secured by a lien onsecurity agreement that gives the revenues (less certain operating expenses) of our operating subsidiaries, whose facilities were financed by the bonds. Such revenues also secure our revolving credit facility on a parity basis with the bonds, pursuanttrustee rights to the termsnet operating income generated by our Santa Cruz and Palo Verde utilities. The tax-exempt bonds require we maintain a minimum debt service coverage ratio of an intercreditor agreement among the bond trustee, the bank lender under our senior revolving credit facility and us.
The revolving credit facility and the bond loan agreements are cross-defaulted to one another. Upon the occurrence of any default under the revolving credit agreement that is not cured within any applicable grace or cure period, the revolving credit lender could suspend funding, or possibly terminate its loan commitment, accelerate the outstanding obligations under the credit facility and exercise any of its other rights and remedies under the revolving credit documents. Upon the occurrence of any event of default under the bond loan agreement, the trustee for any particular series of bonds may, or upon written direction from the holders of at least 50% in outstanding principal amount of that series of bonds, is required to, accelerate the maturity of the bonds and exercise any other rights and remedies available to it.
Subject to compliance with a pro forma debt incurrence test and certain other conditions, the development authority may issue additional revenue bonds for our benefit. Under the terms of the bond documents, the additional bonds would be secured by the collateral for the 2006 and 2007 bonds on a parity basis. We still have available $25.9 million in directors’ discretionary portion of tax exempt volume cap allocation. If market conditions improve materially during 2008, we may move to issue the remaining allocation. We have until December 2009 to issue the remaining bonds in order to recoup a 1% deposit.
Wells Fargo Revolving Credit Facility.  We have entered into a one-year committed revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. This credit facility will terminate on March 31, 2009 unless extended and is used primarily for short-term working capital needs. Interest rates on advances are1.10:1.00, tested annually based on the prime ratecombined operating results of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., less 1.25%. We have the option to fix the rate on a portion of outstanding borrowings at the applicable LIBOR plus 1.25%. In addition, the credit facility has a letter of credit sub-feature, which allows for up to $15 million of the total line to be outstanding at any time in the form of a letter of credit.our Santa Cruz and Palo Verde utilities. As of December 31, 2007, $34.6 million was outstanding under the revolving credit facility and $3.3 million in letters of credit had been issued. All indebtedness under this facility is secured by2014, we maintained a blanket lien covering the stock of our utility subsidiaries, the limited liability company interests of Global Water Management, LLC and other assets and is guaranteed by one of our directors, William S. Levine, and Levine Investments, L.P., a limited partnership of which Mr. Levine is a general partner. If this credit facility were not extended beyond its current maturity date of March 31, 2009, we would seek to substitute bond or equity financing, although our growth would be restricted.
Our ability to borrow under this credit facility is limited to a cash coverage ratio of 1.35:1, calculated by dividing last twelve months of EBITDA by cash interest payments on all debt made during the same period. If our outstanding borrowings under the credit facility were to exceed this borrowing base, we would be required to repay the excess within 10 days. Our revolving credit agreement contains customary representations and


43

1.48:1.00.


warranties, affirmative, financial reporting and negative covenants, and events of default. Among other things, the credit agreement restricts our ability to incur other indebtedness and guaranties; to merge or consolidate with, or to transfer all or a substantial or material portion of our assets to, any other entity (except for acquisitions within the water and wastewater utility industry); to make certain loans and investments; and to encumber our assets. Financial covenants in the credit agreement require us to maintain at least a minimum net worth, a minimum ratio of annualized recurring EBITDA to annualized interest expense plus current maturities of long-term indebtedness, and a maximum ratio of total senior funded debt to annualized recurring EBITDA. See “ — EBITDA” and “ — Non-GAAP Measure.”
During 2007, borrowings under our revolving credit facility increased by $13.9 million and we borrowed an aggregate of $54.1 million under the loan agreement relating to the Series 2007 tax-exempt bonds. During 2006, borrowings under our revolving credit facility decreased by $612,000 and we borrowed an aggregate of $36.5 million under the loan agreement relating to the Series 2006 tax-exempt bonds. During 2005, borrowings under our revolving credit facility increased by $15.7 million.
Other Financing.  In addition to other sources of financings, we also received customer advances and contributions foron-site construction (net of refunds) of $4.5 million, $4.8 million and $2.1 million in the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We also had loans with the Water Infrastructure and Finance Authority of Arizona of approximately $2.7 million at December 31, 2007. The loans have interest rates ranging from 4.375% to 8.0% and maturity dates ranging from 2008 to 2026. See Note 9 to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our 2008 financing plan reflects management’s intent to fund capital needs through a relatively balanced approach between long-term debt and equity. We expect to fund future maturities of long-term debt through a combination of external debt, cash flow from operations, and issuances of equity. Except as described in “Use of Proceeds,” we have no plans to reduce debt significantly.
Short-Term Debt
Short-term debt consisted of the current portion of secured bank loans.
Regulatory Restrictions
Our issuance of long-term debt securities does not require authorization of the ACC if no guarantee or pledge of the regulated subsidiaries is utilized. However, ACC authorization is required for the issuance of long-term debt by our regulated subsidiaries. Our regulated subsidiaries normally obtain the required approvals on a periodic basis to cover their anticipated financing needs for a period of time or in connection with specific financing.
Under applicable law, our subsidiaries can pay dividends only from retained, undistributed or current earnings. A significant loss recorded at a subsidiary may limit the dividends that these companies can distribute to us.
Insurance Coverage
We carry

The Company carries various property, casualty and financial insurance policies with limits, deductibles and exclusions consistent with industry standards. However, insurance coverage may not be adequate or available to cover unanticipated losses or claims. We areThe Company is self-insured to the extent that losses are within the policy deductible or exceed the amount of insurance maintained. Such losses could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s short-term and long-term financial condition and the results of operations and cash flows.


44


Contractual Obligations and Commitments
We enter into

The following table presents contractual obligations with third parties in the ordinary course of business. These obligations,and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2007, are set forth in the table below:

                     
     Less than
        More than
 
Contractual obligation(1)(2)
 Total  1 Year  1 - 3 Years  3 - 5 Years  5 Years 
  (In thousands) 
 
Long term debt obligations $128,295  $138  $36,343  $2,821  $88,993 
Interest on long-term debt(3)  124,190   8,253   12,130   11,337   92,470 
Acquisitions(4)  54,875   14,375   12,000   18,500   10,000 
Operating lease obligation  1,980   492   1,015   473    
                     
Total $309,340  $ 23,258  $ 61,488  $ 33,131  $191,463 
                     
2014 (in thousands of dollars).

Contractual obligations(1)  Total   Less than
1 Year
   1 – 3
Years
   4 – 5
Years
   More than
5 Years
 

Long term debt obligations(2)

  $130,187    $2,563    $5,537    $6,369    $115,718  

Interest on long term debt(3)

   121,241     8,411     16,253     15,734     80,843  

Capital lease obligation

   317     91     175     51     —    

Interest on capital lease

   45     22     22     1     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $251,790    $11,087    $21,987    $22,155    $196,561  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
(1)In addition to these obligations, we paythe Company pays annual refunds on advances in aid of construction over a specific period of time based on operating revenues related togenerated from developer-installed water mains or as new customersinfrastructure. The refund amounts are connected toconsidered an investment in infrastructure and take service from such mains. After all refunds are paid or at the expiration of the agreement, any remaining balance is transferred to contributionseligible for inclusion in aid of construction. Thefuture rate base. These refund amounts are not included in the above table because the refund amounts and timing are dependent upon several variables, including new customer connections, customer consumption levels and future rate increases, which cannot be accurately estimated. Portions of these refund amounts are payable annually over the next severaltwo decades, and amounts not paid by the contract expiration dates become non-refundable.nonrefundable and are transferred to contributions in aid of construction.
(2)Under existing Memoranda of Understanding withThe long-term debt obligations reflected in the cities of Maricopa and Casa Grande, we are obligated to pay feestable above exclude the debt discount related to the cities equal to between 2%Series 2007 bonds. The debt discount at December 31, 2014 totaled $359,000 and 3%is netted within the bonds payable balance on the Company’s balance sheet. The debt discount is being amortized over the term of revenue depending on location and between $50 and $100 per meter set in their planning area as a one-time fee. The amounts of such payments cannot presently be determined because we are unable to predict the number of meters that will be installed.Series 2007 bonds.
(3)Interest on the Company’s Series 2006, 2007 and 2008 bonds is based on the fixed rate for the term; interestrates. Interest on the revolver isterm loan with MidFirst bank (which was retired in July 2015) was variable and based on the variable rate in effect at December 31, 2007.
(4)In addition to the amounts shown on the table, we are obligated to pay $1.25 million for our purchase of CP Water Company through a reduction of future ICFA fees and $8.0 million for our purchase of Francisco Grande Utility Company, which will be paid once the transfer of service area is approved. Such amounts are contingent and cannot be determined with accuracy at this time.London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR).

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

We are

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company was exposed to market risk associated with changes in commodity prices, equity prices and interest rates. We useThe Company used a combination of fixed-rate and variable-rate debt to reduce interest rate exposure. As of December 31, 2007 aA hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates associated with variable rate debt would result in a $327,000 decrease$51,000 reduction in ourthe Company’s pre-tax earnings. Ourincome for the year ended December 31, 2014. To reduce the risk from interest rate fluctuations, the Company entered into two five-year interest rate cap transaction agreements for the majority of the Company’s variable-rate bond debt. Under the interest rate cap agreements, the Company would have been reimbursed for the interest costs that occurred in excess of the interest rate cap levels. With the retirement of its term loan with MidFirst bank in July 2015, the Company no longer carries any significant debt at a variable rate.

Other than interest-related risks, the Company believes the risks associated with price increases for chemicals, electricity and other commodities are mitigated by ourthe Company’s ability over the long-term to recover ourits costs through rate increases to our customers.

Non-GAAP Measure
In evaluating our business, we consider and use EBITDA as a supplemental measure of our operating performance. We define EBITDA as net income or loss before interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization. We believe use of EBITDA facilitates operating performance comparisons from periodits customers, though such recovery is subject to period and company to company by removing potential differences caused by variations in capital structures (affecting primarily relative interest expense), the book amortization of intangibles (affecting relative amortization expense), the age and book depreciation of facilities and equipment (affecting relative depreciation expense) and other non-cash charges. We believe that, by eliminating such effects, EBITDA


45

regulatory lag.


provides a meaningful measure of overall corporate performance exclusive of our capital structure and the method and timing of our expenditures associated with building and placing our systems. We also present EBITDA because we believe it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties as a measure of financial performance.
The term EBITDA is not defined under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP, and is not a measure of operating income, operating performance or liquidity presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and when assessing our operating performance, you should not consider EBITDA in isolation, or as a substitute for net income (loss) or other consolidated income statement data prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Some of these limitations include, but are not limited to:
• it does not reflect our cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
• it does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
• it does not reflect the interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt;
• it does not reflect income tax expense, cash required for any tax payments or the cash availability for any tax refunds;
• although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized often will have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and
• other companies may calculate EBITDA differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure.
We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our U.S. GAAP results and using EBITDA only supplementally.
The following table provides a reconciliation of financial measures prescribed by U.S. GAAP to financial measures referred to in this report, other than those prescribed by U.S. GAAP, which are also known asnon-GAAP measures.
             
  Year Ended December 31, 
  2007  2006  2005 
  (In thousands) 
 
Income from continuing operations (GAAP)
 $2,009  $6,317  $ 5,414 
Income tax expense (benefit)  (1,404)  (740)   
Interest expense  4,329   1,448   7 
             
Adjusted EBIT (non-GAAP)
 $4,934  $7,025  $5,421 
             
Depreciation and amortization  8,613   5,601   3,338 
             
Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)
 $13,547  $12,626  $8,759 
             
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The application of critical accounting policies is particularly important to ourthe Company’s financial condition and results of operations and provides a framework for management to make significant estimates, assumptions and other judgments. Although our management believes that these estimates, assumptions and other judgments are appropriate, they relate to matters that are inherently uncertain. Accordingly, changes inAdditionally, the estimates, assumptions and other judgments applied to these accounting policies could have a significant impact on our financial condition and results of operations as reflected in our combined consolidated financial statements.


46


OurCompany’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flow are impacted by the methods, assumptions and estimates used in the application of critical accounting policies. ManagementAlthough the Company’s management believes that the areas described below require significant judgment in the application of accounting policy or in makingthese estimates, assumptions and assumptions inother judgments are appropriate, they relate to matters that are inherently uncertain and that may change in subsequent periods. Our management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and the estimates and assumptions regarding them. In addition, our management has also reviewed the following disclosures regarding the application of these critical accounting policies.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
As of December 31, 2007, we had $45.8 million of goodwill and $33.6 million of intangible assets. The goodwill is associated entirely with the acquisition of WMC and its five subsidiary utilities in 2006, representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, and was assigned to reporting units based on the fair values at the date of the acquisition. Intangible assets consist of various recharge permits, certificated service areas and contract rights.
We performed a purchase price allocation analysis for WMC and its subsidiaries as of the acquisition date of July 11, 2006 using the discounted cash flow method to allocate $51.4 million of the purchase price to identifiable intangible assets and goodwill. Recharge permits held by WMC were identified as intangible assets and allocated $5.6 million of value. The balance was allocated as goodwill to the five subsidiary utilities in amounts determined by the analysis.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” referred to as SFAS 142, goodwill is reviewed annually or more frequently if changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. To test for impairment, we utilize discounted estimated future cash flows and comparable public company market data analyses to measure fair value for each reporting unit. This calculation is highly sensitive to the estimated future cash flows of each reporting unit, the discount rate assumed and the change in market data in these calculations. Annual impairment reviews are performed in the fourth quarter. Application of the goodwill impairment test requires management’s judgments,including the identification of reporting units, assigning assets and liabilities to reporting units, assigning goodwill to reporting units and determining the fair value of each reporting unit. In addition, we will need to consider the market price of our common stock on the date of the concurrent initial public offering or a decline over a period of time of our stock price following the consummation of the concurrent initial public offering.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, other than goodwill and intangible assets, which are discussed above, consists primarily of utility plant assets. Long-lived assets, other than land and goodwill, are depreciated over their estimated useful lives and are reviewed for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. Such circumstances would include items such as a significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset, a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset is being used or planned to be used or in its physical condition, or a history of operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of the asset. In addition,Accordingly, changes in the expected useful life of these long-lived assets may also be an impairment indicator. Potential impairment of assets held for use is determined by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. We estimate the fair value of the asset from future cash flows expected to result from the use and, if applicable, the eventual disposition of the assets. If the carrying value is greater than the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the amount by which the asset’s carrying value exceeds its fair value. The key variables that must be estimated includeestimates, assumptions regarding sales volume, rates, operating costs, labor and other benefit costs, capital additions, assumed discount rates and other economic factors. These variables require significant management judgment and include inherent uncertainties since they are forecasting future events. A variation in the


47


assumptions used could leadjudgments applied to a different conclusion regarding the realizability of an asset and thusthese accounting policies could have a significant effectimpact on the combinedCompany’s financial condition and results of operations as reflected in the Company’s financial statements. For further discussion of the Company’s accounting policies and estimates, see the notes to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements.
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Revenue RecognitionIncome Taxes

Revenues

Estimation of income taxes includes an evaluation of the regulated utility subsidiaries are recognized as water and wastewater services are delivered to customers and include amounts billed to customers on a cycle basis and unbilled amountsrecoverability of deferred tax assets based on estimated usage from the datean assessment of the latest meter readingCompany’s ability to utilize the endunderlying future tax deductions against future taxable income before they expire. The Company’s assessment is based upon existing tax laws and estimates of future taxable income. If the assessment of the accounting period. Unbilled revenuesCompany’s ability to utilize the underlying future tax deductions changes, the Company would be required to recognize fewer of the tax deductions as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 were $331,000, $221,000 and $87,000, respectively. Increases in volumes delivered toassets, which would increase the utilities’ customers and favorable rate mix due to changes in usage patterns in customer classesincome tax expense in the period couldin which the determination is made.

Goodwill

Goodwill is evaluated for impairment at least annually. For the purposes of this evaluation, management must make an estimate of a weighted-average cost of capital to be significant toused as a company-specific discount rate, which takes into account certain risk and size premiums, risk-free yields, and the calculationcapital structure of unbilled revenue.the industry. The Company also considers other qualitative and quantitative factors including the regulatory environment that can significantly impact future earnings and cash flows and the effects of the volatile current economic environment. Changes in these projections or estimates could result in a reporting unit either passing or failing the timing of meter reading schedules and the number and type of customers scheduled for each meter reading date would also have an effect on the estimated unbilled revenue; however, since the majority of our customers are billed on a monthly basis, total operating revenues would remain materially unchanged.

Revenue from ICFAs with developers and homebuilders is recognized at the time water meters are installed and service begins to a particular lot. Cash received under the agreements prior to the commencement of water service is recorded as deferred revenuefirst step in the combined consolidated balance sheets.
Accounting for Income Taxes
Prior to the Reorganization, we will have been a limited liability company that elected to be treated as a partnership for income tax purposes, which means that elements of income and expense flow through and are taxed to the members on an individual basis. As a result, a provision or liability for income taxes for these entities is not included in the combined consolidated financial statements. After the Reorganization, we will be subject to corporate income tax.
Our subsidiaries, Global Water—Palo Verde Utilities Company, Global Water—Santa Cruz Water Company, and GWI and its subsidiaries are taxable incorporated entities that utilize the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion of all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. There were no valuation allowances reported at December 31, 2007, 2006 or 2005.
Recently Issuedgoodwill impairment model.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007,April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB),(“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141(R) “Business Combinations,Update (“ASU”) 2014-08, “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity,(SFAS No. 141(R)). This statement establishes principleswhich changes the criteria for recognizing assetsreporting discontinued operations and liabilities acquiredchanging the disclosures for disposals that meet the definition under the new guidance. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in a company’s strategy would be deemed a discontinued operation. To meet the definition of strategic shift, the disposal should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results. Examples of the type of disposals that would qualify as a discontinued operation include a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business, combination, contractual contingenciesor a major equity method investment. For those disposals that meet the criteria, expanded disclosures on assets, liabilities, income and certain acquired contingencies to be measured at their fair values at the acquisition date. This statement requires that acquisition-related costs and restructuring costs be recognized separately from the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115,” referred to as SFAS 159. This standard permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.expenses would apply. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This standard will be


48


effective for us on January 1, 2008. We did not elect to measure any assets or liabilities at fair value under this standard.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” referred to as SFAS 157. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The statement applies when other statements require or permit the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities. This statement does not expand the use of fair value measurement. SFAS 157 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2008. TheCompany’s adoption of SFAS 157ASU 2014-08 in the first quarter of 2015 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
See Note

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which completes the joint effort between the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board to converge the recognition of revenue between the two boards. The new standard affects any entity using U.S. GAAP that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets not included within other FASB standards. The guiding principal of the new standard is that an entity should recognize revenue in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for the delivery of goods and services. ASU 2014-09 may be adopted using either of two acceptable methods: (1) retrospective adoption to each prior period presented with the option to elect certain practical expedients; or (2) adoption with the cumulative effect recognized at the date of initial application and providing certain disclosures. To assess at which time revenue should be recognized, an entity should use the following steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when, or as, the entity satisfies a performance obligation. For public business entities, ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within the reporting period. For private companies, ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Earlier application allowed in certain circumstances. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this guidance may have on our consolidated financial position.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern: Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern,” which defines management’s responsibility in evaluating whether there is substantial doubt about an organizations ability to continue as a going concern. The new standard provides that an entity’s management should evaluate whether conditions or events exist that would raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. If substantial doubt exists, the guidance provides principles and definitions to assist management in assessing the appropriate timing and content in their financial statement disclosures. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Interest—Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs,” which requires debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the associated debt liability, consistent with the accounting of debt discounts. The effects of this update are to be applied retrospectively as a change in accounting principal. For public business entities, ASU 2015-03 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-03 will require the Company to reclassify debt issuance costs retrospectively beginning January 1, 2016. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this guidance may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Income Taxes: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,” which requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in the classified statement of financial position. The purpose of this update is to simplify the presentation of deferred liabilities and assets. For public business entities, ASU 2015-17 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. For private companies, the ASU is effective for financial statements for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company is currently assessing the impact this guidance may have on our Combined Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion ofconsolidated financial statements.

JOBS Act Accounting Election and Other Matters

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act. Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can elect to delay adopting new or revised accounting standards recently adoptedissued subsequent to the enactment of the JOBS Act until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We may avail ourselves of this exemption from adopting new or pending adoption.


49

revised accounting standards and, therefore, would not be subject to new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies.


The Company has historically accounted for compensation expense related to its liability-classified stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) using the intrinsic value method, as permitted by ASC 718 for nonpublic entities, with changes to the value of the SARs recognized as compensation expense at each quarterly reporting date. Upon becoming a public company, as defined in ASC 718, in the first quarter of 2016, the Company is required to change its methodology for valuing the SARs. While the SARs will continue to be re-measured at each quarterly reporting date, the SARs are required to be accounted for prospectively at fair value using a fair value pricing model, such as Black-Scholes. The Company plans to record the impact of the change in valuation methods as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as permitted by ASC 250. The effect of the change will be to increase or decrease the SAR liability by the difference in compensation cost measured using the intrinsic value method and the fair value method with an equal and offsetting change to retained earnings in the consolidated balance sheet. Any changes in fair value after the initial adoption will be recorded as compensation expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

BUSINESS

BUSINESS
Introduction
Overview

We are a leading water resource management company that providesowns, operates and manages water, wastewater and recycled water utility services. Recycled water is highly treated and purified wastewater that is distributed throughout theutilities in strategically located communities, we serve for a variety of non-potable uses through a separate distribution system of purple pipes.principally in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona. We callseek to deploy our integrated approach, which we refer to as “Total Water Management,” or “TWM,” a term which we use to mean managing the entire water cycle by owning and operating the water, wastewater and recycled water utilities within the same geographic areas in order to both to conserve water and to maximize its total economic and social value. Our application of TWM has provenWe use Total Water Management to be effective as a means of water scarcity management that promotespromote sustainable communities in areas where management expectswe expect growth to outpace the existing potable water supply.

Our model focuses on the broad issues of water supply and scarcity and applies principles of water conservation through water reclamation and reuse. Our basic premise is that the world’s water supply is limited and yet can be stretched significantly through effective planning, the use of recycled water and by providing individuals and communities resources that promote wise water usage practices.

We currently own and operate 16nine water and wastewater utilities in strategically targeted communities in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona.Phoenix. We currently serve more than 50,000 people in approximately 20,000 homes within our 332 square miles of certificated service areas, which are serviced by five wholly-owned regulated operating subsidiaries as of September 30, 2015. Approximately 94.9% of our active service connections are customers of our Santa Cruz and Palo Verde utilities, which are located within a single service area. We have grown significantly since our formation in 2003, with total revenues increasing from $4.9 million to $25.8 million fromin 2004 to 2007$32.6 million in 2014, and total service connections increasing from 8,145 to 38,682 from8,113 as of December 31, 2004 to December 31, 2007,38,620 as of September 30, 2015, with the potential capacity in our planningregionally planned service areas large enough to serve approximately two million service connectionsconnections.

Our Corporate History

Global Water Resources, LLC (“GWR”) was organized in the future.

Our objective is2003 to become the largest investor-owned operatoracquire, own, and manage a portfolio of integrated water and wastewater utilities in the southwestern region of the United States. Global Water Management, LLC (“GWM”) was formed as an affiliated company to provide business development, management, construction project management, operations, and administrative services to GWR and all of its regulated subsidiaries.

In early 2010, the members of GWR made the decision to raise money through the capital markets, and GWR and GWM were reorganized to form the Delaware corporation that we are today. The members established a new entity, GWR Global Water Resources Corp. (“GWRC”), which was incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) on March 23, 2010 to acquire shares of our common stock and to actively participate in our management, business and operations through its representation on our board of directors and its shared management. On December 30, 2010, GWRC completed its initial public offering in Canada and its common shares were listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

Concurrently with the consummation of this offering, GWRC will merge with and into the Company with the Company surviving as a Delaware corporation, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including GWRC’s shareholder approval. For additional information, see “The Transactions—Reorganization Transaction.” At the effective time of the merger, holders of GWRC’s common shares will receive one share of the Company’s common stock for each outstanding common share of GWRC.

U.S. Water Industry Overview

U.S. Water Industry Areas of Business

The U.S. water industry has two main areas of the arid western U.S. where water scarcity management is necessary for long-term economic sustainability and growth.

Our growth strategy involves the elements listed below:
business:

 acquiring

Utility Services to Customers. This business includes municipal water and wastewater utilities, which are owned and operated by local governments or forminggovernmental subdivisions and investor-owned water

and wastewater utilities. Investor-owned water and wastewater utilities are generally economically regulated, including with respect to rate regulation, by public utility commissions in the path of prospective population growth;states in which they operate. The utility segment is characterized by high barriers to entry, including high capital spending requirements.

 expanding our service areas geographically and organically growing our customer base;
 Water Products and Services. This business includes manufacturing, engineering and consulting companies and numerous other fee-for-service businesses. The activities of these businesses include the building, financing and operating of water and wastewater utilities, utility repair services, contract operations, laboratory services, manufacturing and distribution of infrastructure and technology components, and other specialized services. At present, and upon the prior sale of the FATHOMTMbusiness and the Loop 303 Contracts, the Company no longer performs any of these unregulated services.

Key Characteristics of the U.S. Water Industry

In the United States, the water industry is characterized by:

 deploying our TWM approach into these utilities and service areas;
 Significant Constraints on the Availability of Fresh Water. In Arizona, the Arizona Department of Water Resources estimates that annual water usage is 6.96 million acre-fee per year, of which 2.8 million acre-feet comes from the Colorado River, and approximately half of that is delivered through the Central Arizona Project, a 336 mile diversion canal from the Colorado River to central Arizona. The Colorado River is presently over-allocated, which means that more surface water right allocations have been issued than the actual average annual flow, with allocations being determined based on data from a period during which flows were significantly higher than in recent years. The Central Arizona Project is the only means of transporting Colorado River water into central Arizona. Approximately 43% of the water used in Arizona comes from groundwater. Water in the western United States is being pumped from groundwater sources faster than it is replenished naturally, a condition known as overdraft. In areas of water scarcity, such as the arid western United States, water recycling represents a relatively simple, inexpensive and energy-efficient means of augmenting water supply as compared to transporting surface water, groundwater or desalinated water from other locations. Approximately 70% of the water provided by municipalities is currently used for non-potable applications where recycled water could potentially be utilized.

 structuring and operating related unregulated businesses; and
 Lack of Technology Utilization to Increase Operating Efficiencies and Decrease Operating Costs. The U.S. water industry has traditionally not taken advantage of advances in technology available to enhance revenue, increase operating efficiencies and decrease operating costs (including labor and energy costs). Areas of opportunity include automated meter reading, systems management and administrative functions, such as customer billing and remittance systems. Key drivers for the lack of investment in technology in water and wastewater utilities have been the historical lack of incentives offered or standards imposed by regulators to achieve efficiencies and lower costs and the ownership of the U.S. water utility sector, which largely consists of small, undercapitalized, municipally-owned utilities that lack the financial and technical resources to pursue technology opportunities.

 replicating our business model in areasHighly Fragmented Ownership. The utility segment of the U.S. water scarcity.industry is highly fragmented, with approximately 53,000 water utilities and approximately 16,000 community wastewater utilities, according to the EPA. The majority of the approximately 53,000 water utilities are small, serving a population of 500 or less, and 83% of the water utilities serve only 9% of the population.
U.S. Water and Wastewater Industry

Large Public Sector Ownership. Municipally-owned utilities provide water and wastewater services for the vast majority of the U.S. population. For homes connected to a community water system, over 80% are provided service by municipally-owned utilities. For homes connected to a community wastewater system, over 95% are provided service by municipally-owned utilities.

Aging Infrastructure in Need of Significant Capital Expenditures. Water infrastructure in the United States is aging and requires significant investment and stringent focus on cost control to upgrade or

replace aging facilities and to provide service to growing populations. Throughout the United States, utilities are required to make expenditures on the rehabilitation of existing utilities and on the installation of new infrastructure to accommodate growth and make improvements to water quality and wastewater discharges mandated by stricter water quality standards. Water quality standards, first introduced with the introduction of the Clean Water Act in 1972 and the Safe Drinking Water Act in 1974, are becoming increasingly stringent and numerous. For water, the American Water Works Association estimates capital investments to restore aging infrastructure and to build additional infrastructure for the growing population may be as much as $1 trillion over the next 25 years. For wastewater, the American Society of Civil Engineers estimates capital investment needs to update and grow the nation’s wastewater and storm water systems may be as much as $298 billion over the next twenty years.

OverviewPrivate Sector Opportunities

The U.S.

Municipal water utilities typically fund their capital expenditure needs through user-based water and wastewater industry has three main segments: (i) utility,rates, municipal taxes or the issuance of bonds. However, raising large amounts of funds required for capital investment is often challenging for municipal water utilities, which involves supplying water, wastewater and water recycling servicesaffects their ability to consumers; (ii) general products and services, which involves providing water- and wastewater-related products and services to water and wastewater utilities and other customers on a contract basis; and (iii) water resource management, which involves production and monetization of water as a commodity through the trading of rights and credits.

The utility segment includes municipal systems, which are owned and operated by local governments or governmental subdivisions, and investor-owned systems. Growth of service providers in the utility segment is principally achieved through acquisitions of other water and wastewater systems and organic growth of the population served by such providers.
The utility segment is characterized by high barriers to entry, including highfund capital spending requirements. Investor-owned water and wastewaterspending. Many smaller utilities also face required regulatory approval processes, which may involve obtaining relevant operating approvals, including certificates of public convenience and necessity or similar authorizations (CC&Ns) from state public utility commissions or other entities engaged in economic regulation of public utilities (PUCs). Investor-owned water and wastewater systems are generally economically regulated by the PUCs in the states in which they operate. The federal government and the states also regulate environmental, health and safety and water quality matters for both investor-owned and government-owned water and wastewater utilities.
The general products and services segment includes engineering and consulting companies and numerous other fee-for-service businesses. These include the building, financing and operating of water and wastewater


50


utility systems, system repair services, contract operations, laboratory services, manufacturing and distribution of system technology components, and other specialized services. The general services segment is characterized by aggressive competition and market-driven growth and profit margins.
The water resource management segment responds to the increasing demand for fresh water driven by population growth, changing weather patterns and concentration of urban populations. This has created opportunity for companies that can increase fresh water availability in areas where scarcity presents serious concern. Speculators anticipating future supply shortages and cost increases are driving the growing market for water rights. A water right evidences the legal right to extract water from an existing source and redirect it for beneficial use. The economic value of a water right depends on factors such as proximity to end use, local demand and growth, seniority relative to other rights and transferability. Companies with access to abundant supplies may also engage in water wholesaling to utilities or other end users.
Aging water infrastructure coupled with continuing population growth will require significant infrastructure investment throughout the U.S. Required spending encompasses rehabilitation of existing systems, installation of new infrastructure to accommodate growth in and improvements to water quality and wastewater discharges mandated by stricter water quality standards which began with the passing of the Clean Water Act in 1972 and the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that approximately $276.7 billion will be needed between 2003 to 2022 in order to continue to provide clean and safe drinking water to water system consumers. These needs include installation of new infrastructure as well as rehabilitation or replacement of deteriorated or undersized infrastructure. The EPA documented the total infrastructure needs of publicly-owned wastewater treatment utilities during the period between 2004 and 2024 at $202.5 billion, of which more than 65% represented wastewater treatment, collection and conveyance.
The following charts set forth estimated capital expenditure needs for U.S. water and wastewater systems for the periods shown:
Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs
2003-2022
(FLOW CHART)

Source: EPA Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs

Survey & Assessment, 3rd Report

(June 2005)
Wastewater Infrastructure Needs
2004-2024

(FLOW CHART)

Source: EPA Clean Watershed Needs Survey

(January 2004)
Recycled water distribution, as shown in the above chart, is a new category designed to report on the increasing trend toward using recycled water for beneficial purposes such as irrigation. Fifteen states reported $4.3 billion in recycled water distribution needs in response to the EPA survey. According to Global Water


51


Intelligence Water Reuse Markets2005-2015, A Global Assessment and Forecast, approximately $25.1 billion is projected for investment in recycled water distribution internationally over the next ten years.
Recycled water is created by taking wastewater and applying advanced tertiary treatment to create a high quality, non-potable water source. The use of recycled water for non-potable applications has the potential to reduce demand for potable water by up to approximately 40% as opposed to conventional wastewater discharge methods.
Fragmentation and Consolidation
The utility segment of the U.S. water and wastewater industry is highly fragmented, with approximately 53,000 water systems and approximately 16,000 wastewater systems, according to the EPA. As shown in the charts below, the majority of the approximately 53,000 water systems are very small, serving a population of 500 or less. Government-owned systems make up the vast majority of the U.S. water and wastewater utility segment, accounting for approximately 84% of all water systems in the U.S. and approximately 98% of all wastewater systems in the U.S. Investor-owned water and wastewater systems account for the remainder of the water and wastewater systems in the U.S.
The following charts set forth the total U.S. water industry by system type and the total population served by system type, respectively, for 2005:
(2 PIE CHARTS)
This large number of relatively small water and wastewater utilities results in inefficiencies in the marketplace, since smaller utilities maydo not have the in-house technical and engineering resources to manage significant infrastructure or technology-related investments. In order to meet their capital spending challenges and take advantage of technology-related operating expertise, financialefficiencies, many municipalities are examining a combination of outsourcing and technological capabilitypartnerships with the private sector or economies of scaleoutright privatizations.

Outsourcing involves municipally-owned utilities contracting with private sector service providers to provide services, such as meter reading, billing, maintenance or raise capitalasset management services.

Public-private partnerships among government, operating companies and private investors include arrangements, such as efficiently as larger utilities. These inefficiencies may leaddesign, build, operate contracts; build, own, operate and transfer contracts; and own, leaseback and operate contracts.

Privatization involves a transfer of responsibility for, and ownership of, the utility from the municipality to industry consolidation in the future, as theprivate investors.

We believe investor-owned utilities acquire smaller, local water and wastewater systems. Investor-owned utilities that have greater access to capital are generally more capable of addressing increasingly stringent environmental and human health standards, navigating a wide variety of regulatory processes and making mandated and other necessary infrastructure upgrades to both water and wastewater systems.

Largeutilities, addressing increasingly stringent environmental and human health standards and navigating a wide variety of regulatory processes. In addition, investor-owned utilities that achieve larger scales are able to spread overhead expenses over a larger customer base, reducethereby reducing the costs to serve each customer. Since many administrative and support activities can be efficiently centralized


52


to gain economies of scale and sharing of best practices, companies that participate in industry consolidation have the potential to improve operating efficiencies, lower unit costs, and improve service at the same time.
Water and Wastewater Rates
Investor-owned water and wastewater utilities generate operating revenue from customers based on rates that are established by PUCs through a rate-setting process that may include public hearings, evidentiary hearings and the submission by the utility of evidence and testimony in support of the requested level of rates. In evaluating a rate case, state PUCs typically focus on five areas: (i) the amount and prudence of investment in facilities considered “used and useful” in providing public service; (ii) the operating and maintenance costs and taxes associated with providing the service (typically by making reference to a representative12-month period of time, known as a test year); (iii) the appropriate rate of return; (iv) the tariff or rate design that allocates operating revenue requirements equitably across the customer base; and (v) the quality of service the utility provides, including issues raised by customers. For most consumers, water and wastewater bills make up a relatively small percentage of household expenditures compared to other utility services.
The following chart sets forth the relative cost of water in the U.S. as a percentage of total household utility expenditures:
(2 BAR CHARTS)
Many municipal water and wastewater systems do not adequately account for their infrastructure investment needs and charge rates below cost, which effectively subsidizes water and wastewater services for their consumers. As a result, they generate insufficient revenue to finance infrastructure investments and in some cases, operations and maintenance costs as well, and will need to increase their rates absent other sources of funding. Large investor-owned utilities’ rates are premised upon a pricing approach that recovers the full cost of water and wastewater services. The elimination of rate subsidies (explicit or otherwise) would also signal the value of water to consumers and play an important role in demand-side management, encouraging conservation of water. New, investor-owned systems that do not require integration with existing facilities, also known as “green field” systems, typically incorporate full cost pricing from initiation of services.
Public-Private Partnerships
Capital expenditures related to municipal water supply, treatment and distribution and wastewater collection and treatment facilities are typically funded by water and wastewater rates, taxes or the issuance of bonds. However, raising large amounts of funds is challenging for municipal water utilities, which impacts their ability to increase capital spending. In order to meet their capital spending challenges, many municipalities are examining a combination of privatizations and partnerships with the private sector. Privatization involves a transfer of responsibility for, and ownership of, the utility from the municipality to the private sector. Partnerships between municipalities and the private sector (“public-private partnerships”) include design, build, operate contracts; build, own, operate and transfer contracts; and own, leaseback and


53


operate contracts. Under these types of contracts, the municipality maintains ownership of the water system and the private sector takes responsibility for managing and operating the system.
Sources of Supply
Raw water is typically collected from one of three sources:
• surface water, including reservoirs, lakes, ponds, rivers and streams;
• groundwater, drawn from wells and aquifers; and
• purchased water obtained from other water suppliers, or through the use of water credits.
Throughout the U.S., water is supplied primarily from surface water and groundwater. In the arid western U.S., available surface water is largely allocated, leaving little room for expansion of this source to meet increasing demand. Procurement of surface water can also be expensive, often requiring miles of transport before consumption. The amount of water in a surface water source is dependent on annual precipitation, and water restrictions may be implemented by state or local agencies if water levels drop below a predetermined amount. In some cases, a regional drought may cause authorities to implement water use restrictions throughout a jurisdiction impacting all utilities, even those whose supplies are more than adequate.
Groundwater is not renewable except to the extent it is recharged. The ability to extract and use groundwater is limited by a number of factors, including regulatory restrictions, depth, geology and chemistry. Groundwater and surface water supplies are increasingly strained by population growth. This scarcity is also being exacerbated by drought in many regions of the U.S. and in other countries and by the effects of climate change. As a result, we believe there is a heightened public and regulatory focus on the importance of and use of renewable resources generally, including water.
Although purchased water is available through suppliers, including other utilities and water wholesale agencies, its price and availability are relatively volatile and subject to negotiation. Fresh water availability can be improved through the creation of fresh water from seawater, a process called desalination. Desalination is a potential source of drinking water, but its potential benefit as an alternative source of drinking water is limited due to a number of factors, including cost of production and proximity to sources of water for the desalination process. Accomplished through thermal distillation or reverse osmosis, desalination is more common in fresh water scarce regions of the world with an abundant supply of seawater.


54


In areas of water scarcity, such as the arid western U.S., water recycling represents a relatively simple and inexpensive means of augmenting supply as compared to the use of surface water, groundwater, purchased water or desalination. The principal savings relate to energy savings and the reduced need for long-distance water transportation and associated pipeline construction costs and energy. For example, the following graph compares the energy consumption involved in producing water that is recycled, pumped from the aquifer, imported and desalinated.
Relative Energy Costs of Production
(kWh/acre-foot)
(BAR GRAPH)
Source: Future Potential for Recycled Water, Bahhman Sheikh, Tampa, Florida, September 11, 2007.
Unique Characteristics of the Arid Western U.S.
Many states in the arid western U.S. are characterized by a combination of population growth and limited renewable water supply. In these areas, there is increased likelihood of water scarcity and conflict as population grows and increased temperatures due to climate change place additional stress on water resources. Already there is evidence of shifting public opinion and government policies in many of these states that favor demand-side management practices such as water recycling and reuse.
Population Growth
Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada and Utah, located in the arid western U.S., are projected by U.S. Census data to grow from an aggregate population of 48.1 million in 2005 to an estimated aggregate population of 59.0 million in 2020, a 22.7% increase. This growing population will require an increasing supply of water.


55


CHART
Water Scarcity
In addition to increased demand for water and wastewater services resulting from a significant projected increase in population, states in the arid western U.S. have been required to deal with general conditions of water scarcity exacerbated by extended periods of drought. The region’s principal sources of water supply—groundwater and surface water—are characterized by limited and diminishing availability. Groundwater is not renewable except to the extent it is recharged; however, in some areas of the arid western U.S., it is being withdrawn more rapidly than it is being replenished. Although surface water is renewable, its principal sources of supply are experiencing shortages that are projected to continue over the long term. For example, Lake Mead, the vast reservoir for the Colorado River water that sustains the rapidly growing cities of Phoenix and Las Vegas, could lose water faster than previously thought and run dry by 2021, according to a January 2008 study by scientists at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (the “Scripps Study”). In addition, the Colorado River is over-allocated and its flow may be insufficient without further conservation measures to support projected demand, particularly in Arizona. See “—Impact of Projected Growth in Arizona.”


56


The following map illustrates the susceptibility of the western U.S. to the lack of a sustainable water supply.
MAP
Source: Electric Power Research Institute, 2003 Survey of Water Use and Sustainability in the United States with a Focus on Power Generation.
Climate Change
According to a climate change study published in February 2008 in Science Magazine, up to 60% of the changes in river flow, winter air temperature and snow pack runoff in the western U.S. result from increased production of atmospheric greenhouse gases. The Scripps Study cites a number of models suggesting that increasing temperatures resulting from global warming will lead to a significant decrease in surface water available to the western U.S. through runoff to the Colorado River. The estimates of runoff reduction range from 10% to 30% over the next 30 to 50 years. Even small increases in winter air temperature are likely to reduce the amount of mountain snowfall, and as a result, snowpack that previously acted as timed-release water storage will provide less water as it melts in the spring. Additionally, earlier melting could result in increased flooding that cannot be captured completely by existing dams, reservoirs and other infrastructure.
Laws and Regulations
In response to these conditions and prospects, some states are adopting policies and regulations promoting demand management and water reuse. For example:
• California has provided in its state water code that the use of potable water for specified non-potable uses is an unreasonable use of water if recycled water is available for such purposes;
• the Southern Nevada Water Authority has adopted a variety of conservation incentives, including economic incentives for water-efficient landscaping;
• Arizona has adopted regulations defining Class A+ recycled water and authorizing a variety of uses for such water; and


57


• All of the states in the arid western U.S. (except for California, which has delegated planning to the local level) have adopted drought preparedness plans, with Arizona’s plan stating that treated wastewater has the potential to replace potable water supply when potable water quality is not required.
Impact of Projected Growth in Arizona
Projected Population and Economic Growth.  Arizona presents significant long-term population and economic growth prospects despite a recent real estate market slowdown. The following table provides U.S. Census data comparing Arizona’s current and projected population growth with that of the U.S.
         
  Arizona  U.S. 
 
2007 estimated population  6.4 million   301.6 million 
Projected population 2030  10.5 million   356.2 million 
Total percentage growth2010-2030
  61.4%   17.7% 
Average annual percentage growth2010-2030
  3.1%   0.9% 
Additionally, the Maricopa Association of Governments estimates that by 2020 Phoenix will add approximately 1.4 million new jobs and 926,000 additional housing units. A Global Insight Inc. forecast predicts that Arizona will show the second highest job growth rate in the U.S. over the next 25 years. We believe these growth prospects are based on a variety of factors, including: Arizona’s warm climate; predominantly single-family development; informal lifestyles; geographic proximity to the West Coast, Mexico and Texas; a balanced, competitive tax structure; business incentives focused on job growth; a relatively low cost of living, particularly in the housing area; and business and governmental leadership and cooperation.
Increased Need for Water.  Arizona’s growing population will require an increasing supply of water. Based on U.S. Census data and CAP water supply and demand projections, statewide demand is likely to exceed the available water supply as early as 2040, when Arizona is projected to reach a population of approximately 13.4 million. Drought conditions and shortfalls in surface water supply contribute to this situation.
Arizona draws on three sources of water for consumptive use: the Colorado River, groundwater and other surface water. It is also increasingly using recycled water for non-potable uses. Approximately 35%, or 2.8 millionacre-feet, of Arizona’s water comes from the Colorado River, and approximately half of that is delivered through the CAP to central Arizona. The Colorado River is presently over-allocated, with Arizona’s allocated portion being based on data from a period during which flows were significantly higher than in recent years. The CAP is the only means of transporting Colorado River water into central Arizona, and a CAP Drought Impact Analysis projects that Arizona could experience shortages of this water as early as 2012 if past conditions continue. In addition, Arizona’s claim to Colorado River water through the CAP is junior in priority to California’s entire allocation. Specifically, Arizona will bear more than 90% of the first 1.5 millionacre-feet of any shortage affecting Arizona, California and Nevada.
Non-Colorado River surface water sources include the Salt, Verde, Gila and Agua Fria Rivers and the reservoir storage systems located on them. On average, Arizonans receive 17%, or 1.4 millionacre-feet, of their water from non-Colorado River surface water sources. Approximately 36%, or 2.9 millionacre-feet, of the water used in Arizona comes from groundwater, and approximately 5%, or 1.0 millionacre-feet, is recycled water.
In Arizona, water is being pumped from groundwater sources faster than it is replenished naturally—a condition known as overdraft. This has led to declines in water level by hundreds of feet in some areas as well as aquifer compaction, subsidence of the ground surface and soil fissures, which inhibit recharge of the aquifers. In order to control the potential for overdraft, the Phoenix, Prescott and Tucson Active Management Areas (AMAs), which include our West Valley regional planning area, are mandated to achieve safe yield by 2025 or sooner (that is no net change to aquifer levels after 2025). Until recently, the Pinal AMA, which includes our Maricopa-Casa Grande regional planning area, had historically been based on the subsistence of


58


agriculture and allowed for a “planned depletion”. Recent changes to the Pinal AMA assured water supply rules have moved all AMAs toward a safe yield management goal.
Our Strategy

We are a water resource management company that provides water, wastewater and recycled water utility services. We have become a leader in Total Water Management practices such as water scarcity management and advanced water recycling applications. Our objectivelong-term goal is to become one of the largest investor-owned operator of integrated water and wastewater utilities in areas of the arid western U.S. where water scarcity management is necessary for long-term economic sustainability and growth.

Our growth strategy involves the elements listed below:

acquiring or forming utilities in the path of prospective population growth;

expanding our service areas geographically and organically growing our customer base within those areas; and
• acquiring or forming utilities in the path of prospective population growth;
• expanding our service areas geographically and organically growing our customer base;
• deploying our TWM approach into these utilities and service areas;
• structuring and operating related unregulated businesses; and
• replicating our business model in areas of water scarcity.

deploying our Total Water Management approach into these utilities and service areas.
TWM

We believe this plan can be executed in our current service areas and in other geographic areas where water scarcity management is necessary to support long-term growth and in which regulatory authorities recognize the need for water conservation through water recycling.

Total Water Management is a demand-side-management framework (in that it is a solution intended to drive down demand for renewable supplies versus develop new renewable water supplies) that alleviates the pressures of water scarcity in communities where growth is reasonably expected to outpace potable water supply. Built on an all-encompassing view of the water cycle, TWMTotal Water Management promotes sustainable community development through reduced potable water consumption while monetizing the value of water through each stage of delivery, collection and reuse. We are leading the policy shift toward the adoption of TWM and redefining the potential of the traditional water utility.

Our business model applies TWMTotal Water Management in high growth communities. Components of our TWMTotal Water Management approach include:

regional planning to reduce overall design and implementation costs, lever the benefits of replicable designs, gain the benefits of economies of scale and enhance our position as a primary water and wastewater service provider in the region;

stretching a limited resource by maximizing the use of recycled water, using renewable surface water where available and recharging aquifers with any available excess water;
• regional planning to reduce overall design and implementation costs, lever the benefits of replicable designs, gain the benefits of economies of scale and enhance our position as a primary water and wastewater service provider in the region;
• stretching a limited resource by maximizing the use of recycled water, using renewable surface water where available and recharging aquifers with any available excess water;
• integrated and standardized water, wastewater and recycled water infrastructure delivery systems utilizing a separate distribution system of purple pipes to conserve water resources, reduce energy, treatment and consumable costs, provide operational efficiencies and align the otherwise disparate objectives of water sales and conservation;
• gaining market and regulatory acceptance of broad utilization of recycled water through strategic relationships with governments, academic institutions, research facilities and agencies, coupled with public education and community outreach campaigns; and
• automated processes such as Supervisory Control & Data Acquisition (“SCADA”), Automated Meter Reading (“AMR”) and back-office technologies and systems such as “green” billing that reduce operating costs and manpower requirements, improve system availability and reliability and improve customer interface.

integrating and standardizing water, wastewater and recycled water infrastructure delivery systems using a separate distribution system of purple pipes to conserve water resources, reduce energy, treatment and consumable costs, provide operational efficiencies and align the otherwise disparate objectives of water sales and conservation;

Our TWM-basedgaining market and regulatory acceptance of broad utilization of recycled water through strategic relationships with governments, academic institutions, research facilities and agencies, coupled with public education and community outreach campaigns; and

automated processes such as supervisory control and data acquisition, automated meter reading and back-office technologies and systems such as “green” billing that reduce operating costs and manpower requirements, improve system availability and reliability and improve customer interface.

We believe our Total Water Management-based business model provides us with a significant competitive advantage in high growth, water scarce regions. DevelopersBased on our experience and discussions with developers, we believe developers prefer our approach because it provides a bundled solution to infrastructure provision and improves housing density in areas of scarce water resources while reducing the developers’ up-front financial obligation through our ICFA structure.resources. Developers are also focusing on increased consumer and regulatory demands for environmentally friendly or “green” housing alternatives. Communities prefer the


59


approach because it provides a partnering platform which promotes economic development, reduces their traditional dependence on bond financing and ensures long term water sustainability.

Our competitive advantage facilitates the execution of our growth strategy. Demand for our TWM-based platform generates new business opportunities and a high success rate in bids for new territories. Our proven conservation methods lead to successful permitting for more connections in expanded and new service areas.

Market Opportunities

Our Competitive Strengths

We have a number of competitive strengths that we believe will contribute to long-term value creation for our stockholders.

Opportunities forOur Utilities Are Located in Areas of Strong Population Growth in Our ExistingWhere We Have Contracted Service Areas

Our existing service areas present significant opportunities for organic growth of our business. Because we are based in one of the fastest growing states in the U.S. and operate utilities in high growth areas of that state, our organic growth potential is significant compared to traditional investor-owned water utilities, which we believe have relatively limited prospects for organic growth and rely primarily on acquisitions to fuel customer growth.

We have secured regulatory approval to provide water and wastewater services in large, growing service areas, where we have built infrastructure ahead of development. We believe this positions us for significant organic growth for the foreseeable future.

Regional Planning Areas.  We have two largethree regional planning areas totaling 378located in the metropolitan Phoenix area with area-wide permits and contractual service rights relating to over 500 square miles.miles of territory. Our Maricopa-Casa Grande regional

planning area encompasses 244 square miles that includes the cities of Maricopa and Casa Grande, located south of Phoenix. That area is served primarily by our Santa Cruz and Palo Verde utility subsidiaries. Our West ValleyEloy regional planning area encompasses 134 square miles in western Maricopa County near the town of Buckeye, west of the Hassayampa River. That area is served primarily by our Water Utility of Greater Tonopah subsidiary for water service and by our Hassayampa Utility Company subsidiary for wastewater service. We believe there is significant opportunity for organic growth due to future development in our Maricopa-Casa Grande and West Valley regional planning areas.

Population Growth.  Our Maricopa-Casa Grande regional planning area isare located in Pinal County.County, Arizona. Pinal County is rapidly changing from primarily rural to an area of suburbanization. According to a 2006 U.S. Census estimate, Pinal County grew by 51%117% from a population of 180,000179,727 in 2000 to 271,000393,813 in 2006, making2013, and by 4.8% between years 2010 and 2013, ranking it the sixth fastest growing county in the U.S. and theas a third fastest growing county in Arizona in terms ofbased on percentage population growth. A Pinal County Small Area Transportation study conducted in 2006 estimates that the population of Pinal County will grow to 1.9 million by 2025.
growth for this period.

Our West Valley regional planning area is located in Maricopa County. Maricopa County gained 696,000797,927 residents between 2000 and 2006,2011, and 196,047 residents between years 2010 and 2013. Maricopa County is the largest numerical increase of anyfastest growing county in the U.S. during this period according to U.S. Census data.Arizona and Maricopa County is now the fourth largest county in the U.S., with 3.8approximately 4.0 million residents. The Maricopa Association

Modern Infrastructure Provides Foundation for Future Growth With Low Future Capital Expenditures

We believe that as demand for new homes continues to recover in the regions we serve, there will be opportunities for growth, particularly in the Maricopa-Casa Grande region, where our local utilities have considerable infrastructure already in place. As a result of Governments projectsour investment in modern infrastructure, we expect our regulated utilities business in our current service areas to have relatively low capital expenditures for the foreseeable future because greater than 90% of our infrastructure was built in the last twelve years compared to most U.S. drinking water infrastructure, which were built 50 or more years ago.

Leader in Utilization of Technology and Innovation

We use technology to reduce costs, increase revenues and save water. We focus on technological innovations that this population will growallow us to approximately 4.5 million by 2025.

Service Connection Growth.  Each new resident requires both adeliver high-quality water and wastewatercustomer service connection. We estimate that each square mile of regionalwith lower potential for human error, delays and inefficiencies. Our comprehensive technology platform includes FATHOM™, which includes customer information systems, automated meter reading and geographical information system technologies, and supervisory control and data acquisition systems, which we use to map and monitor our physical assets and water resources on an automated, real-time basis with fewer employees than the standard water utility model requires. Our innovative approaches to utility planning, area represents 2,240 potential water connectionsconservation and 2,240 potential wastewater connections.
Opportunities for Further Consolidation and Expansion
We are actively pursuing strategic expansion opportunities in Arizona in both our regulated and unregulated businesses. For example, we recently received approval for a utility service area near Eloy, Arizona, which is located between Tucson and Phoenix. Eloy is located at the junction of two major interstate highways and is in the heart of Arizona’s “Sun Corridor,” which is expected to attract significant long-term growth. We are actively pursuing a 100-square mile regional planning area associated with this new service area.
In addition to Arizona’s attractive growth prospects as described above, we believe Idaho and Nevada present attractive long-term growth prospects. According to U.S. Census data, Idaho’s population is projected to grow by 29.8%, or an average of 1.5% per year, from 2010 to 2030, and Nevada’s population is projected


60


to grow by 59.2%, or an average of 3.0% per year, over the same period. We believe the regulatory environment in each state will be receptivetechnology utilization have led to our emphases on water conservation, regional planning and collaborative regulatory relationships.
Although our acquisition experience and current plans focus primarily on Arizona and on new opportunities in Idaho and Nevada, our business model is replicable in other geographic areas as well. Ourdevelopment of strong relationships with developerskey regulatory bodies.

The FATHOM™ customer information system uses automated voice, internet billing, payment processing and builders have introducedcustomer service applications to reduce operating expenses. The FATHOM™ Advanced Metering Infrastructure technology allows us to other areasread water meters remotely, improves water resources accounting, allows for identification of the U.S. in which prospective populationhigh water usage and economic growthidentifies water theft from disconnected meters. The FATHOM™ asset management technology maps physical assets on an electronic, automated basis allowing personnel to accurately and water conservation awareness could form a suitable basis forefficiently manage maintenance and their day-to-day duties.

We deploy our Total Water Management model. International awarenessmodel through, amongst other ways, the use of water conservation and related initiatives has also become increasingly prevalent. We believe this increasing awareness provides an opportunity for us to expand internationally, although we have no present plans in that regard. See “—Our Strengths—Replicableour sector-leading technology. Total Water Management Business Model.

Our Strengths
enables sustainable community development through reduced potable water consumption and management believes that if maximized, Total Water Management could result in a 40% to 60% reduction in potable water consumption per customer in areas where recycled water is made available to residential homes and commercial and industrial facilities for interior use. Since September 2004, we estimate that we have saved over 5 billion gallons of potable water by providing recycled water in place of groundwater for uses where potable water is not required.

Well-Positioned for Long-Term GrowthUnique and Proven Advanced Technology Platform

We have a proven ability to acquire and integrate high growth, accretivebelieve that we are one of the only water utilities throughthat has developed its own integrated suite of advanced services, which we have capturedbranded as FATHOM™. Initially developed to support and optimize our utility operations, implementation of the FATHOM™ system has consistently demonstrated cost savings for third party utilities and provides opportunities for increased utility revenues. We sold the FATHOM™ business in June 2013 (retaining a

minority ownership position, which is currently approximately 8%), although we continue to use and benefit from the internally developed FATHOM™ service suite. For additional service territories that will serve as a base for future revenue. information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Events—Sale of FATHOM™ Business.”

Proven Ability to Acquire and Consolidate

We have acquired 13or formed 16 regulated water and wastewater utilities during(four of which have subsequently been divested and three of which have been merged), five of which are operating with active customer service connections. We have successfully consolidated the past four years, and our integration of their operations, management, infrastructure, technology and employees with ours.of these utilities. Not all utilities acquired by us can accommodate the Total Water Management model, as it is necessary that we own both the water and the wastewater infrastructure in the area. In those cases, we seek to improve operational and administrative efficiencies of the utility using our technology platform and through economies of scale. We believe this experience presents a strong platform for further expansion and that our success to date also engenders positive relationships and credibility with regulators, municipalities, developers and customers in both existing and prospective service areas.

The

Our Regulated Utilities

We own and operate regulated water, wastewater and recycled water utilities we have acquired arein communities principally located in geographicmetropolitan Phoenix. As of December 31, 2014, our utilities collectively had 43,568 active service connections offering predictable rate-regulated cash flows. Revenues from our regulated utilities accounted for approximately 99% of total revenues in 2014. Our utilities currently possess the high-level regional permits that allow us to implement our business model; thus, we are well-positioned for organic growth in our current service areas that present significant opportunitiesare generally located in Arizona’s strong population growth corridors: Maricopa/Casa Grande, West Valley and Eloy Regions.

A key component of our water utility business is the use of recycled water. Recycled water is highly treated and purified wastewater that is distributed through a separate distribution system of purple pipes for long-term revenue growth.a variety of beneficial, non-potable uses. Recycled water can be delivered for all common area irrigation needs, as well as delivered direct to homes where it can be used for outdoor residential irrigation. Total Water Management model, an integrated approach to the use of potable and non-potable water to manage the entire water cycle, both conserves water and maximizes its total economic value. The following chart showsapplication of the estimated potential numberTotal Water Management model has proven to be effective as a means of service connections within the regional planning areas that will be served by our acquired or formed utilities, assuming maximum buildout, 3.5 homes per acre and two service connections per home. See “—Market Opportunities—Opportunities for Growth in Our Existing Service Areas” and “—our Regulated Utilities—Acquisition History.”

             
        Estimated
 
     Estimated
  Potential
 
     Potential
  Service
 
Regional Planning Areas
 Square Miles  Homes  Connections 
 
Maricopa-Casa Grande  244   546,560   1,093,120 
             
(includes Global Water — Santa Cruz Water Company,            
Global Water — Palo Verde Utilities Company, 387            
Domestic Water Improvement District, 387 Wastewater            
Improvement District, Francisco Grande and CP Water)            
Eloy Region(1)  66   147,840   295,680 
(includes Picacho Cove Water Company and Picacho Cove            
Utilities Company)            
West Valley  134   300,160   600,320 
(includes Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Hassayampa            
Utilities Company and Balterra Sewer Company)            
             
Totals
  444   994,560   1,989,120 
             
(1)Proposed regional planning area in negotiation.
Demonstrated Ability to Align Green and Socially Responsible Practices into our Profitable Growth Company
We have developed a profitable model that encourages and promotes resource conservation. We have integrated proven technologies into a water scarcity management platform that providespromotes sustainable communities and helps achieve greater dwelling unit density in areas where the availability of sustainable water can be a socially responsible


61


approach to sustainable community growth.key constraint on development. Our replicable model incorporates advanced process automation that both improves operating efficiencies and leveragesimplementation of the increasing value of recycled water as an emerging renewable resource. In our largest service area, this model has significantly reduced potable water consumption while also increasing profits and service connections.
Replicable Total Water Management Business Modelphilosophy in Arizona has led to the development of strong relationships with key regulatory bodies.

A summary description of our water utilities at September 30, 2015 is set forth in the following table and described in more detail below:

Company

  Date of
Acquisition (A) or
Formation (F)
  Service Provided  Square Miles
of Service
Area(1)
  Active Service
Connections
 

MARICOPA / CASA GRANDE REGION

       

Global Water-Santa Cruz Water Company

   2004 (A)  Water  73   17,960  

Global Water-Palo Verde Utilities Company

   2004 (A)  Wastewater and
Recycled Water
  102   17,748  

WEST VALLEY REGION

       

Water Utility of Greater Tonopah

   2006 (A)  Water  105   336  

Willow Valley Water Company(2)

   2006 (A)  Water  4   1,515  

Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale

   2006 (A)  Water  1   79  

Balterra Sewer Corp

   2008 (A)  Wastewater and
Recycled Water
  2   —    

Hassayampa Utility Company

   2005 (F)  Wastewater and
Recycled Water
  41   —    

ELOY REGION

       

Picacho Cove Water Company

   2006 (F)  Water  2   —    

Picacho Cove Utilities Company

   2006 (F)  Wastewater and
Recycled Water
  2   —    

Total

     332   37,638  

(1)Certified areas may overlap in whole or in part for separate utilities.
(2)On March 23, 2015, we reached an agreement to sell the operations and assets of Willow Valley to EPCOR.

Maricopa/Casa Grande R

Our business modelegion

The City of Maricopa is highly replicablelocated approximately 12 miles south of Phoenix. The relative proximity to a significant urban center, coupled with relatively abundant and we haveinexpensive land, were the key drivers of the real estate boom experienced by this community. In 2005, the City of Maricopa was one of the fastest growing cities in the nation. While growth has slowed nationally since 2007, the City of Maricopa continues to grow, as demonstrated this successfullyby our addition of 4,355 active service connections (representing approximately 2,000 homes) from December 2009 to December 2014. Development in Arizona. Our West Valley operations are modeled afterthe area is considered to be affordable and built onrepresents one of the successes achieved in our Maricopa-Casa Grande planning area. The regional planning, permitting and partnershipsfew areas within the United States where a new home can be purchased from the mid $100,000s.

We operate in this West Valley region mirror those established in Maricopa-Casa Grande and provided a means by which to capture a very large service territory in this area. The West Valley model will demonstrate the next iteration of our replication strategy whereby every residential and commercial street will be fitted with purple pipes for recycled water and every house and commercial address with be fitted with two water meters—one for potable water and one for recycled water.

Our model is applicable in any high growth region of current or future water scarcity. We are in the process of expanding into Eloy, Arizona and into Idaho and Nevada, demonstrating that there is demand for a TWM-based platform beyond Arizona.
Entrepreneurial, Innovative Management Approach
In contrast to the traditional water utility model built exclusively on rate base and volume accretion, our management team has an entrepreneurial focus that emphasizes growth and efficiency, coupled with environmentally responsive practices. With this focus, our team has created an effective business model that addresses a fast-growing market need. The adaptive nature of our management approach means that we are able to identify and exploit new market business opportunities quickly and effectively. Underpinning its vision and entrepreneurial approach, our management team has significant regulatory compliance and permitting experience in the water and wastewater industry, and has demonstrated success in the acquisition of accretive utilities, the integration of the acquired companies and the management of a high-growth company.
We believe that the following awards and recognitions further demonstrates the abilities and achievements of our management team:
• our company was ranked #5 nationally in Entrepreneur Magazine’s 2008 Hot 100 competition;
• our Chief Executive Officer received Ernst & Young’s regional Entrepreneur of the Year award in 2007;
• our company won three awards in the 2008 Utility Communicators International Better Communicators Competition for our education and outreach campaign on the value of recycled water and was named one of 50 “Arizona Companies to Watch” receiving the Spotlight Award for Commerce from the Arizona Small Business Association;
• our company was selected as one of the 30 “best places to work” by the Phoenix Business Journal; and
• our company received Environmental Excellence Awards in environmental education, communication, buildings and structures from the Valley Forward organization.


62


Our Regulated Utilities
Acquisition History
The following table shows the utilities we have acquired since our inception in 2003, together with information relating to their service territories and growth since acquisition.
                             
                   No. of
 
       Square
  Square
  Square
  No. of
  Service
 
       Miles of
  Miles of
  Miles of
  Service
  Connections
 
       CC&N at
  CC&N as of
  CC&Ns
  Connections
  as of
 
Date of
      the Time of
  December 31,
  in
  at
  December 31,
 
Acquisition Company Acquired Region  Acquisition  2007  Process  Acquisition  2007 
 
2008
  Balterra Sewer Corp(1)   West Valley   2   2          
2007
  CP Water, Inc.(2)   Maricopa/
Casa Grande
   2   2          
2006
  Francisco Grande Utility Company(3)   Maricopa/
Casa Grande
   32   32          
2006
  West Maricopa Combine(4)(5)   West Valley   91   94   74   6,256   7,455 
2005
  Sonoran Utility Services, LLC(6)   Maricopa/
Casa Grande
   16   16          
2005
  Cave Creek Water Company, Inc.(7)   n/a                
2004
  Palo Verde Utilities Company, LLC   Maricopa/
Casa Grande
   9   30   59   1,675   15,510 
2004
  Santa Cruz Water Company, LLC   Maricopa/
Casa Grande
   9   30   46   1,712   15,717 
                           
Total
          161   206   179   9,643   38,682 
(1)Balterra Sewer Corp CC&N (two square miles).
(2)CP Water, Inc. contained a CC&N for the provision of water services (two square miles).
(3)Francisco Grande contained a CC&N for the provision of water services (14 square miles) and a wastewater CC&N (18 square miles).
(4)Included five utility subsidiaries of West Maricopa Combine — Willow Valley Water Company, Inc.; Valencia Water Company, Inc.; Water Utility of Greater Buckeye, Inc.; Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc.; Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale, Inc. The Hassayampa Utility Company was formed to provide wastewater services for the region.
(5)Water Utility of Greater Tonopah CC&N (67 square miles) and Hassayampa Utility Company CC&N (3 square miles) were expanded to 103 and 41 square miles respectively effective May 6, 2008.
(6)Included a Domestic Water Improvement District (eight square miles) and a Wastewater Improvement District (eight square miles).
(7)Cave Creek Water Company, Inc. acquisition included Pacer Equities, Inc. (Both entities were sold in 2007).
Global Water -through Santa Cruz Water Company (“Santa Cruz”) and Global Water - Palo Verde Utilities Company (“Palo Verde”)
Verde.

We acquired Santa Cruz Water Company, LLC and Palo Verde Utilities Company, LLC in 2004. Santa Cruz contributed 35%serves 17,960 active service connections as of September 30, 2015 and revenues from Santa Cruz represented approximately 34.5% and 35.9% of our 2007 total revenue whilefor the year ended December 31, 2014 and the nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Palo Verde contributed 23%serves 17,748 active service connections as of September 30, 2015 and revenues from Palo Verde represented approximately 43.5% and 45.5% of our 2007 total revenue.

revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.

The Santa Cruz and Palo Verde CC&Nservice areas include approximately 30175 square miles, with a potential build-out of approximately 65,000 homes. We expect to continue to receive requests for service outside the existing CC&N. The utilities currently serve 31,227 service connections, which we expectbelieve provide further opportunities for growth once development returns to grow to approximately 100,000 inthese areas and water and wastewater utility services are required. Most of the next 10 years. The companies’ entireSanta Cruz and Palo Verde infrastructure is less than fiveten years old, with an expected lifeand all of 50 to 100 years.

The companiesit is less than fifteen years old. Santa Cruz and Palo Verde provide water and wastewater services, respectively, under a public-privatean innovative public- private partnership memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) towith the City of Maricopa in Pinal County. ACounty for approximately 278 square miles of its planning area. We signed a similar MOU was signed

memorandum of understanding with the City of Casa Grande to partner in providing water, wastewater, and recycled water services to aan approximate 100 square milemiles of its western region offor anticipated growth.


63


Rate proceedings were completed in 2010 for both Santa Cruz and Palo Verde acquiredVerde. In July 2012, these two utilities filed applications with the assets of Sonoran Utilities Services, LLC in the City of Maricopa in 2005. These assets operate in the 387 Domestic Water and Wastewater Improvement Districts, which are contiguous utility areas to the Santa Cruz and Palo Verde service territories. The 387 Districts and Santa Cruz/Palo Verde infrastructures are now interconnected and incorporated into a single regional plan. This acquisition effectively consolidated water and wastewater services in the entire northern section of the city’s jurisdictional and planning area. The Sonoran acquisition included service areasArizona Corporation Commission for 27,000 potential customers, with 3,000 of the potential customers added since the acquisition.
We plan to invest in a fully integrated water resource model for water reclamation and reuse in the region, with $20.0 million committed to our 2008 regional capital budget. Among the projects contemplated, we plan to construct two new Class A+ regional water reclamation facilities and two new water treatment plants. We also plan to expand the existing32-acre water reclamation facility owned by Palo Verde and have the necessary permits to do so. Santa Cruz owns the water storage and distribution site, in addition to well sites to provide water production, disinfection, and distribution services, and both companies own easements and rights of way to allow for the delivery of water, the collection of wastewater, and the redistribution of recycled water.
West Maricopa Combine, Inc.
The acquisition of WMC solidified our position in the high-growth West Valley. With service areas of 88 square miles, its utility subsidiaries, Valencia Water Company (“Valencia”), Water Utility of Greater Buckeye, Inc. (“Buckeye”), Water Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc. (“Greater Tonopah”), Willow Valley Water Company, Inc. (“Willow Valley”), and Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale (“Northern Scottsdale”), are expected to serve over 135,000 homes at build-out. WMC contributed approximately 15% of our 2007 total revenue. The following table shows the relative revenue contributions of WMC’s subsidiaries to its 2007 total revenue.
         
     Percentage
 
  2007
  of WMC Total
 
Utility
 Revenue  Revenue 
  (In thousands)    
 
Valencia $2,640   67%
Buckeye  431   11%
Greater Tonopah  264   7%
Willow Valley  510   13%
Northern Scottsdale  87   2%
         
WMC $3,932   100%
         
WMC also owns the Hassayampa River Recharge Project, a recharge and water storage system that will store water from the CAP west of Phoenix to the Hassayampa River Basin, where it percolates to the aquifer. See “—Our Unregulated Businesses.”
Valencia Water Company.  As of December 31, 2007 Valencia provided water services to 4,827 connections in the Town of Buckeye. Valencia covers an area of roughly 12 square miles south of Interstate 10 at Miller Road in Buckeye. Most of this service area has been rezoned from agriculture to residential, with many developments underway. The majority of the raw land holdings now in this CC&N area are held by land developers and are in various stages of the entitlement process.
Water Utility of Greater Buckeye.  Buckeye provides water services to areas to the east and north of the Town of Buckeye. The company served approximately 628 customers at December 31, 2007. Buckeye covers an area of roughly six square miles. The company’s operations were under condemnation proceedings that were successfully terminated in 2007.
Water Utility of Greater Tonopah.  Greater Tonopah provides water services to Maricopa County west of the Hassayampa River. The company served approximately 355 customers at December 31, 2007. The company holds 103 square miles of CC&N, including 36 square miles that were in process at December 31,


64


2007, but have since been approved, in areas west of the Hassayampa River that are currently being master planned for development. We formed Hassayampa Utility Companyincreased rates using 2011 as the Wastewater Utility Companytest year on which the Arizona Corporation Commission will use to support customers served by Greater Tonopah. Hassayampa now has 41 square miles,evaluate the utilities’ rates. The rate proceedings were completed in February 2014. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of which 38 square miles were approved subsequent to December 31, 2007. Our acquisitionFinancial Condition and Results of this utility allowed us to enter into agreements with developers to serve a total of roughly 100,000 home sites plus commercial, schools, parks and industrial developments. Numerous projects are in various stages of the county’s planning and zoning process, and many have already received their development master plans. To date, sevenOperations—Recent Rate Case Activity” for additional development master plans have been approved, representing approximately 33,167 acres and 99,770 estimated dwelling units.
Willow Valley Water Company.  Willow Valley provides water services to customers living 10 miles south of Bullhead City in Mohave County along the Colorado River near the California and Nevada borders. The company served approximately 1,571 connections at December 31, 2007. Willow Valley treats water to remove iron and manganese. Willow Valley’s piping infrastructure is aging and requires investment on our part. Willow Valley also requires investment in order to submit a request for a rate increase. We intend to make investments into Willow Valley during 2008 with the potential for a general rate case in 2009.
Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale.  Northern Scottsdale provides water services to two small subdivisions in northern Scottsdale. This company encompasses approximately 74 connections at December 31, 2007. We have filed an application to raise rates in this system. We are seeking a 45% increase in revenues, which equates to $163,000 per year. We anticipate a decision on our application by the middle of 2009.
Hassayampa Utility Company Inc.
Hassayampa Utility Company Inc. (“Hassayampa”) is a new wastewater utility company incorporated to serve a master community plan in western Maricopa County. The company’s initial three square mile CC&N has the potential to support approximately 5,700 homes and subsequent to 2007, an additional 38 square miles were approved. Applications for various CC&N extensions are pending before the ACC for WMC and Hassayampa totaling more than 34 square miles for both water and wastewater. Hassayampa currently does not have any customers, but expects approximately 300 in 2010 and more than 10,000 within ten years.
Picacho Cove Water Company and Picacho Cove Utility Company
Picacho Cove Water Company Inc. and Picacho Cove Utility Company Inc. (collectively, “Picacho Cove”) are new water and wastewater companies incorporated to serve a master community planned for Pinal County, specifically along the Picacho Mountains north of Interstate 10 near Eloy. The master plan covers approximately eight square miles of service area and includes approximately 4,500 homes, which will likely be for an age-restricted retirement community. Picacho Cove currently does not have any customers, but expects to have approximately 300 in 2010 and more than 3,600 within ten years.
CP Water Company
information.

We acquired CP Water Company (“CP”CP Water”) in 2006. CP providesWater provided water service within parts of Pinal County. CP Water received a CC&NCertificate of Convenience and Necessity for approximately two square miles of service area in 1984 and currently serves 17 customers. The water system is configuredhas 13 active service connections. We acquired this small utility as a consecutive water system and fed from an adjacent water system owned by Arizona Water Company. This system is operated under agreement between CP and Arizona Water Company. This small system was acquired inpart of our consolidation strategy to enable the deployment of new integrated infrastructure as development occurs in the corridor between the cities of Maricopa and Casa Grande. CP contributed approximately less than 1%Water’s service area, customers and assets have been transferred to Santa Cruz.

West Valley Region

We operate in this region through Greater Tonopah, Willow Valley, Water Utility of our 2007 total revenue.

Francisco Grande UtilitiesNorthern Scottsdale, Inc. (“Northern Scottsdale”), Balterra Sewer Corp (“Balterra”) and Hassayampa Utility Company
Inc. (“Hassayampa”), and formerly through Valencia Water Company and Greater Buckeye.

We acquired Francisco GrandeGreater Tonopah in 2006. Greater Tonopah serves 336 active service connections as of September 30, 2015. Greater Tonopah has a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for 105 square miles of service area and provides water services to Maricopa County west of the Hassayampa River. The acquisition of Greater Tonopah allowed us to enter into agreements with developers to serve a total of roughly 100,000 home sites plus commercial, schools, parks and industrial developments.

We acquired Willow Valley in 2006. Willow Valley serves 1,515 active service connections as September 30, 2015. Willow Valley has a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for four square miles of service area and provides water services to customers living 10 miles south of Bullhead City in Mohave County along the Colorado River near the California and Nevada borders. On March 23, 2015, we reached an agreement to sell the operations and assets of Willow Valley to EPCOR. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Corporate Transactions—Pending Sale of Willow Valley” for additional information.

We acquired Northern Scottsdale in 2006. Northern Scottsdale serves 79 active service connections as of September 30, 2015. Northern Scottsdale has a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for one square mile and provides water services to two small subdivisions in Northern Scottsdale.

Rate proceedings were completed in 2010 for each of Valencia Water Company, Greater Buckeye, Greater Tonopah and Willow Valley utilities. Northern Scottsdale completed a rate proceeding in 2008. In July 2012, these five utilities filed applications with the Arizona Corporation Commission for increased rates using 2011 as the test year on which the Arizona Corporation Commission evaluates the utilities’ rates. The rate proceedings were completed in February 2014. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Rate Case Activity” for additional information.

We acquired Balterra in 2006. Balterra is a wastewater utility and has a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for two square miles in an area in western Maricopa County known as Tonopah. Balterra currently has no active service connections; however, its service area lies directly in the expected path of future growth in the far west valley of metropolitan Phoenix, which should provide opportunities for growth once development commences in this area.

We formed Hassayampa in 2005. Hassayampa is a wastewater utility and has a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for 41 square miles in an area that is contiguous to Balterra. Hassayampa currently has no active service connections; however, like Balterra, its service area lies directly in the path of future growth in the far west valley of metropolitan Phoenix, which will provide opportunities for growth once development commences in this area.

In October 2012, we and our subsidiary, 303 Utilities Company, (“Francisco Grande”)and the City of Glendale entered into an agreement for future wastewater and recycled water services, advancing our public-private-partnership originally approved by the city council in 2006. Francisco Grande receivedMarch 2010. The agreement named 303 Utilities Company as the future wastewater and recycled water provider for a CC&N7,000-acre territory within a portion of Glendale’s western planning area known as the Loop 303 Corridor. The 303 Utilities Company also signed certain wastewater facilities main extension agreements with numerous developers/landowners in 1977the service area to fund the initial design and construction of a wastewater and recycled water utility. In addition, we signed separate offsite water management agreements with these same developers/landowners to provide the coordination, permitting, and engineering work for the related water utility service element of the project. In September 2013, we entered into an agreement to sell the Loop 303 Contracts to a third-party. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Events—Sale of Loop 303 Contracts” for additional information.

We formerly operated additional utilities in the West Valley Region through Valencia Water Company and Greater Buckeye. Valencia Water Company was consolidated with Greater Buckeye in 2008, and on July 14, 2015, we closed the stipulated condemnation to transfer the operations and assets of Valencia Water Company with the City of Buckeye. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Events—Stipulated Condemnation of the Operations and Assets of Valencia Water Company” for additional information.

Eloy Region

The City of Eloy, Arizona is located in Arizona’s “sun corridor” and is approximately equidistant between Phoenix and Tucson. The City of Eloy represents an area of 100 square miles and has a population of approximately 17,000.

We operate in this region through Global Water-Picacho Cove Water Company and Global Water-Picacho Cove Utilities Company (collectively, “Picacho Cove”). We formed Picacho Cove in 2006 to provide water and wastewater services in the City of Eloy and currently have a 32Certificate of Convenience and Necessity for four square milemiles. The utilities currently have no active service area within portionsconnections and no facilities.

Our Unregulated Division

Initially developed to support and optimize our own utilities, we commercialized the FATHOM™ business in 2009 and marketed FATHOM™ as an integrated suite of Pinal County. Francisco Grande consists of service territory only. This system was acquired in our


65

technology-enabled services to municipally-owned utilities. The services offered by FATHOM™ provide automation, cost savings and opportunities for increased revenues. FATHOM™ contracts typically contained non-recurring implementation fees and ongoing fees following implementation.


consolidation strategyOn June 5, 2013, we sold the FATHOM™ business to enable the deployment of new integrated infrastructure as development occursan investor group led by a private equity firm which specializes in the corridor betweenwater industry. For additional information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Events—Sale of FATHOM™ Business.” FATHOM™ historically served as the citiesback-office of Maricopa and Casa Grande.
We applied to haveour unregulated division. However, following the CC&Nssale of CP Water and Francisco Grande transferred to our subsidiaries, Global Water - Santa Cruz Water Company and Global Water - Palo Verde Utilities Company in 2007. Our application is currently pending at the ACC.
FATHOM™ business, we report only a single division (i.e., the regulated utilities division).

Operations

We treat water to potable standards and also treat, clean and recycle wastewater for a variety of non-potable uses. A description of these operations follows.

Sources of Water Supply

Our water supply issupplies are primarily derived from groundwater; however, we currently augment these supplies with recycled water and intend to augment them with surface water and increased use of recycled water in the future. Our Hassayampa River Recharge Project enables us to supplement groundwater supplies in the area by up to 50,000 acre-feet per year. We expect to have sufficient water to supply our areas of anticipated growth. See “Risk Factors—The use of water in our service areas is subject to regulation and expansion of water use is subject to regulatory approvals” and “—Unique Characteristics of the Arid West—Impact of Projected Growth in Arizona” and “—Our Unregulated Businesses—Stored Water Credits.”

Potable Water.  Our utilities presently employ groundwater systems for potable water production. Water is brought to the surface from underground aquifers (water levels vary from 50 to 650 feet below land surface depending on the area), disinfected and stored in tanks for distribution to customers. In some instances, individual raw water supplies exceed Safe Drinking Water Act requirements for certain constituents. In those cases, well-head, centralized or blending treatment systems are employed to ensure water quality meets potable standards.
Recycled Water.  Recycled water is created by taking wastewater and applying advanced tertiary treatment (screening, biological reduction, filtration and disinfection processes) to create a high quality, non-potable water source. Each step is monitored and controlled in order that the stringent requirements for recycled water are continuously met. Recycled Water meets Arizona’s Aquifer Water Quality Standards before it leaves the treatment facility, and is recognized as Class A+ recycled water by ADEQ.
Advanced Recycling—100% Ground Water
(RECYCLE PROCESS)


66


Potable Water. Our utilities presently employ groundwater systems for potable water production. Water is brought to the surface from underground aquifers (water levels vary from 50 to 650 feet below land surface depending on the area), disinfected and stored in tanks for distribution to customers. In some instances, individual raw water supplies do not meet the legislative requirements for certain constituents. In those cases, we use well-head, centralized, point-of-use or blending treatment systems to ensure water quality meets potable standards.

Recycled Water. Recycled water is created by taking wastewater and applying advanced tertiary treatment (i.e., screening, biological reduction, and filtration and disinfection processes) to create a high quality, non-potable water source. Each step is monitored and controlled in order that the stringent requirements for recycled water are continuously met. Recycled water generated by us meets Arizona’s Aquifer Water Quality Standards before it leaves the treatment facility and is recognized as Class A+, the highest quality of recycled water regulated by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. Recycled water can be used for irrigation, facilities cooling, and industrial applications and in a residential setting for toilet flushing and lawn watering.

Technology

Technology
We use sophisticated technology as a principal means of improving our margins. We focus on technological innovations that allow us to deliver high-quality water and customer service with minimal potential for human error, delays and inefficiencies. Our comprehensive technology platform includes Supervision Controlsupervisory control and Data Acquisition (SCADA), Automated Meter Reading (AMS)data acquisition, automated meter reading and Geographical Information System (GIS)geographical information system technologies, which we use to map and monitor our physical assets and water resources on a fullyan automated, real-time basis with fewer people than the standard water utility model requires. Our systems allow us to detect and resolve potential problems promptly, accurately and efficiently before they become more serious, which both improves customer service and optimizes and extends the efficient performance and life of our assets. Our AMSautomated meter reading technology, which allows us to read water meters remotely rather than physically, improves water resources accounting, allows for identification of high water usage and identifies water theft from disconnected meters. We also use automated voice, internet billing, payment processing and customer service applications that contribute to additional reduced headcount and a reduction in associated personnel costs. In addition to reducing expenses, our use of technology shifts the balance of our employee base from a primarily unskilled labor force to a more sophisticated team of engineers, systems analysts and technical staff. This creates recruiting, retention and advancement opportunities that position us to attract and retain talented and committed personnel.

Decentralized Treatment Facilities

We design and build standard, decentralized facilities that are scaled to the service areas they serve in order to achieve optimum efficiency in providing both water and wastewater services. This allows us to use smaller, less expensive and more readily available pipes and equipment. The replication of our standard facility also improves design, construction and operating efficiency because we are able to employ similar, proven processes and equipment and technologies at each of our facilities. As a result, our operating efficiency is improved significantly by reducing equipment costs and employee training costs, and our exposure to operational performance risks often associated with larger, custom-built plants is reduced.

Although there has not traditionally been a significant economic incentive or other reward for automation and resource efficiency in our industry, we believe our use of automation in lieu of labor, together with our emphasis on streamlined operations and conservation, will position us well for continued profitable growth and allow us to take advantage of future incentives or rewards that may be available to companieswater utilities that are able to successfully enhance the use of renewable resources.

Our Unregulated Businesses
Although we report our results of operations as a single reportable segment, in addition to our regulated utility operations, we engage or plan to engage in the following activities that generate revenue.
ICFAs.  We generate revenue through our use of ICFAs. Under the terms of these agreements, builders pay usagreed-upon fees upon specified development events. These fees allow us to recover a portion of the carrying costs and time value of the investment inherent in planning and building the expansive facilities required to implement effective regional water conservation in advance of growth. In addition, the relationships with developers and builders that we develop through ICFAs and the regional planning process provide a basis for introduction of our company and our Total Water Management model in other geographic areas in which our developers and builders conduct business. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations.”
Stored Water Credits.  Through our Hassayampa River Recharge Project (“HRRP”), we siphon water from the CAP and store it underground, effectively “manufacturing” long-term storage credits (LTSCs). One LTSC is created for each acre-foot of water recharged. We create, trade, sell or lease these credits as a means of generating additional revenue. This business is based on safe yield requirements for most of Arizona’s urban areas, which require that for every gallon of water pumped out of an aquifer, a gallon must be replenished. We are able to undertake this replenishment at a net cost of approximately $70 per acre-foot and


67


Regulation

sell credits to member service areas. LTSCs have an economic value ranging from $100 to $240 per acre-foot, which is the current regulatory ceiling price for these credits. We began our recharge business in 2007 and plan to sell, assign or transfer recharge credits in 2008 for water that we stored in 2007. In 2007, we created 10,000 recharge credits, and we anticipate creating 50,000 annually by 2012. The ADWR regulates the recharge credits in our portfolio, but the ACC does not regulate our related revenue because retail consumers are not affected.
The HRRP is a non-regulated water storage activity that we operate under two renewable permits issued by the ADWR that have ten and 13 years remaining under its current permit term. We plan to develop the ability to use recycled water that is not immediately usable for this purpose as well.
Provide Services to Third Parties.  We leverage our internet billing and processing, call center and back-office capability by providing those services to third parties. We provide fully “green” notice, billing, payment and record keeping systems for any utility’s billing processes. We also have a certified laboratory and can perform water and wastewater sampling analyses for third parties.
Meter Sales.  Our Santa Cruz utility subsidiary provides services to the 387 Districts that include sales of water meters to developers. Revenues from this line of business fluctuate with the pace of development in the area and have decreased as a percentage of our total revenue in recent years.
Water Transmission Pipelines.  We also plan to provide water transmission pipelines for communities that are importing water to fulfill their water supply requirements. This type of project typically requires large-diameter pipes that transport water over a distance of several miles. With our Total Water Management system, we can decrease the costs of water transportation and treatment because less water will be needed to support a given population density, which in turn permits the use of smaller, less expensive pipes. Providing this service also provides us with a base of service that can be used as a platform for further service expansion. We have not yet entered into any arrangements for this service, but believe it represents a future opportunity for additional revenue.
Competition
As an owner and operator of regulated utilities, we do not face competition within our existing service areas because Arizona law provides the holder of a CC&N for water or wastewater service with an exclusive right to provide that service within the certificate area. In addition, the high cost of constructing water and wastewater systems in an existing market creates a barrier to entry. We do, however, face competition from other investor-owned water and wastewater utilities for new service areas and with respect to acquisition of smaller utilities, and some of these utilities are larger than we are and have more resources and access to capital than we do. We believe our principal competitors in this regard are Arizona American Water, Arizona Water Company and Algonquin Water. We believe competition for new service areas and acquisitions is based on relationships with municipalities and developers, experience in making acquisitions, the ability to finance and obtain regulatory approval, quality of service and the ability to integrate both water and wastewater services and emplace conservation practices throughout the service areas.
We also face competition in our unregulated businesses. Water rights speculators are our principal competitors with respect to the sale of stored water credits and other water utilities will be our principal competitors with respect to pipeline services. We believe competition with respect to the sale of stored water credits is based principally on price, access to water supply and the ability to recharge. Competition for pipeline services will be based principally on price, water supply and access to capital. Municipalities, banks and other traditional sources of developer financing are our principal competitors with respect to ICFAs, and we believe competition in this area is based principally on financing terms, experience, relationships with developers and builders and regulatory credibility. Our principal back-office and laboratory services competitors are companies that specialize in these services, and we believe competition in this area is based principally on price and service quality.


68


Although we believe we compete effectively in our regulated and unregulated businesses, our competitors may have more resources and experience than we have and may therefore have a competitive advantage. See “Risk Factors—Competition.”
Regulation
Our water and wastewater utility operations are subject to extensive regulation by U.S. federal, state and local regulatory agencies that enforce environmental, health and safety regulations,requirements, which affect all of our

regulated subsidiaries. These regulationsrequirements include the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water Act and the regulations issued under these laws by the EPA. The Company isWe are also subject to state environmental laws and regulations.regulations, such as Arizona’s Aquifer Protection Program and other environmental laws and regulations enforced by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, and extensive regulation by the Arizona Corporation Commission, which regulates public utilities. These regulatory agencies also have broad administrative power and authority to set rates and charges, determine franchise areas and conditions of service and authorize the issuance of securities as well as authority to establish uniform systems of accounts and approve the terms of contracts with both affiliates and customers.

We are also are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the storage of hazardous materials, the management and disposal of hazardous and solid wastes, discharges to air and water, the cleanup of contaminated sites, dam safety, fire protection services in the areas we serve and other matters relating to the protection of the environment, health and safety.

We maintain a comprehensive environmental policy includingprogram which addresses, among other things, responsible business practices and compliance with environmental laws and regulations, including the use and effective useconservation of natural resources. Water samples across our water system are analyzed on a regular basis in material compliance with regulatory requirements. We conduct nearly 8,000conducted more than 9,500 water quality tests each yearin 2014 at oursubcontracted laboratory facilities in addition to providing continuous online instrumentations for monitoring parameters such as monitoring turbidity levels,and disinfectant residuals and allowing for adjustments to chemical treatment based on changes in incoming water.water quality. For 2007,2014, we achieved a greater than a 99.7%99.9% compliance rate for meeting state and federal drinking water standards and 98.6%98.1% for compliance with wastewater requirements.requirements, for an overall compliance rating of 99.4%. Compliance with governmental regulations is of utmost importance to us, and we spend considerable time and resources are spent ensuring compliance with all applicable federal, state and local regulationslaws and laws.

regulations.

In addition to regulation by governmental entities, our operations may also be affected by civic or consumer advocacy groups. These organizations provide a voice for customers at local and national levels to communicate their service priorities and concerns. Although these organizations may lack regulatory or enforcement authority, they may be influential in achieving service quality and rate improvements for customers.

Safe Drinking Water Act

The federal Safe Drinking Water Act and regulations promulgated thereunder establish minimum national quality standards for drinking water. The EPA has issued rules governing the levels of numerous naturally occurring and man-made chemical and microbial contaminants and radionuclides allowable in drinking water and continues to propose new rules. These rules also prescribe testing requirements for detecting contaminants, the treatment systems that may be used for removing contaminants and other requirements. Federal and state water quality requirements have become increasingly more stringent, including increased water testing requirements, to reflect public health concerns.

For example, in 2001, In Arizona, the EPA decreased permissible arsenic levels in drinking water and required compliancerequirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act are incorporated by water systems by January 2006. In 2003, a new EPA rule governing non-radon radionuclides became effective, regulating uranium in drinking water forreference into the first time and requiring initial monitoring under state programs by the end of 2007.
Arizona Administrative Code.

In order to remove or inactivate microbial organisms, the EPA has promulgated various rules to improve the disinfection and filtration of drinking water and to reduce consumers’ exposure to disinfectants and byproductsby-products of the disinfection process. In January 2006, the EPA promulgated the Long Term 2 Enhanced


69


Surface Water Treatment Rule and the Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproduct Rule. In October 2006, the EPA finalized the Ground Water Rule, applicable to water systems providing water from underground sources. In 2006, the EPA also proposed revisions to the monitoring and reporting requirements of the existing Lead and Copper Rule.
Significant attention has recently been focused on contaminants of emerging concern (“CEC”)(chemicals and other substances that have no regulatory standard, have been recently “discovered” in natural streams (often because of improved analytical chemistry detection levels), and potentially cause deleterious effects in aquatic life at environmentally relevant concentrations), including endocrine disrupting compounds (“EDC”) and pharmaceuticals and personal care products, (“PPCP”) in drinking water supplies, municipal wastewater effluents and recycled water. EDCsEndocrine disrupting compounds are substances that are not produced in the body but act by mimicking or antagonizing

natural hormones, and are thoughtthere is research associating exposure with endocrine disrupting compounds to be responsible for various reproductive problems in both women and men as well as for increases in the frequency of certain types of cancer. PPCPs,Pharmaceuticals and personal care products, such as fragrances, cosmetics, prescription and over-the-counter therapeutic drugs, veterinary drugs, and sunscreen products, enter the environment through excretion, bathing, and disposal of unwanted medications to sewers and trash. We believe CECscontaminants of emerging concern may form the basis for additional regulatory initiatives and requirements in the future.

Although it is difficult to project the ultimate costs of complying with the above or other pending or future requirements, we do not expect current requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act to have a material impact on our operations or financial condition, although we may have to change our methodit is possible new methods of treating drinking water may be required if additional regulations become effective in the future. In addition, capital expenditures and operating costs to comply with environmental mandates traditionally have been recognized by state public utility commissions as appropriate for inclusion in establishing rates. As a result, we expect to fully recover the operating and capital costs resulting from these pending or future requirements.

Clean Water Act

The federal Clean Water Act regulates discharges of liquid effluents from drinking water and wastewater treatment facilities into waters of the United States, including lakes, rivers, streams and subsurface or sanitary sewers. The EPA administersIn Arizona, with the exception of Clean Water Act and is also responsible for approving the Section 208 ofRegional Water Quality Management Plans, capacity management and operations and maintenance requirements, and source control requirements, wastewater operations are primarily regulated under the Aquifer Protection Permit program and the Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program (see below).

The EPA certifies Clean Water Act Section 208 Regional Water Quality Management Plans and Amendments. In addition toAmendments which govern the location of water reclamation facilities and wastewater treatment plants. The EPA’s 40 C.F.R. Pt. 503 bio-solids requirements applicable to our wastewater collection systems, our operations require discharge permits under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, or NPDES, permit program established under the Clean Water Act. Pursuantare reported to the NPDES program,EPA through the EPA or implementing states set maximum dischargeArizona Department of Environmental Quality. While we are not presently regulated to meet source control requirements, we maintain source control through various Codes of Practice that have been accepted by the Arizona Corporation Commission as enforceable limits for wastewater effluents and overflows from wastewater collectionon consumer discharges to sanitary sewer systems. We believe we maintain the necessary permits and approvals for the discharges from our water and wastewater facilities.

Arizona Regulatory Agencies

In Arizona, the ACCArizona Corporation Commission is the regulatory authority with jurisdiction overinvestor-owned water and wastewater utilities. The ACC also sets utilityArizona Corporation Commission has exclusive authority to approve rates, mandate accounting treatments, authorize long-term financing programs, evaluate significant capital expenditures and regulates corporate structure,plant additions, examine and regulate transactions between a regulated subsidiary and its affiliated entities and approve or disapprove reorganizations, mergers and acquisitions of regulated utilities,prior to their completion. Additionally, the Arizona Corporation Commission has statutory authority to oversee service quality and consumer complaints, and approve or disapprove expansion of service and service territories for various utility companies within Arizona.areas. The Arizona Corporation Commission is comprised of five elected members, each serving four year terms. Companies that wish to provide water or wastewater service are granted a CC&N,Certificate of Convenience and Necessity, which allows them to serve customers within a geographic area specified by a legal description of the property. In considering an application for a CC&N,Certificate of Convenience and Necessity, the ACCArizona Corporation Commission will determine if the applicant is fit and proper to provide service within a specified area, whether the applicant has sufficient technical, managerial and financial capabilities to provide the service and if that service is necessary and in the public interest. Once a CC&NCertificate of Convenience and Necessity is granted, the utility falls under the ACC’sArizona Corporation Commission’s jurisdiction and must abide by the rules and laws by which a public utilityservice corporation operates.

In February 2014, the Arizona Corporation Commission issued Rate Decision No. 74364 for our rate cases filed in July 2012 for the following utilities: Santa Cruz, Palo Verde, Valencia Water Company, Greater

Buckeye, Greater Tonopah, Northern Scottsdale and Willow Valley. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations—Economic Utility Regulation.”

Recent Rate Case Activity” for additional information.

Arizona water and wastewater utilities must also comply with state environmental regulation regarding drinking water and wastewater, including environmental regulations set by Councils of Government (such as the Central Arizona Association of Governments (“CAAG”),and the Maricopa Association of Governments (“MAG”)Governments), ADEQthe Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and the ADWR.Arizona Department of Water Resources. The CAAGCentral Arizona Association of Governments is the designated management authority for the federal Clean Water Act for Pinal County and administers the Section 208 of the Clean Water Act for Pinal and Gila Counties and administers the requirements of the Regional Water Quality Management Plans and Amendments at the local level. MAGThe Maricopa Association of Governments is the designated management authority for the federal Clean Water Act


70


for Maricopa County and administers the Section 208 of the Clean Water Act for Maricopa County and administers the requirements of the Regional Water Quality Management Plans and Amendments at the local level. The Maricopa County Environmental Services Department has been delegated authority for overseeing ADEQArizona Department of Environmental Quality requirements in Maricopa County. The ADEQArizona Department of Environmental Quality regulates water quality and permits water reclamation facilities, discharges of recycled water, re-use of recycled water and recharge of recycled water. The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality also regulates the clean closure requirements of facilities. In Arizona, ADEQthe Arizona Department of Environmental Quality has received primacydelegated authority from the EPA for the administration of the NPDESClean Water Act’s National Pollution Discharge Elimination System program. Permits issued by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality for surface water discharges to waters of the U.S. in Arizona are termed “Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System,” or “AzPDES,” permits. The ADEQArizona Department of Environmental Quality also administers the drinking water quality requirements set by the federal Safe Drinking Water Act within Arizona. Finally, the ADWRArizona Department of Water Resources regulates surface water extraction, groundwater withdrawal, designations and certificates of assured water supply, extinguishment of irrigation grandfathered water rights, groundwater savings facilities, recharge facilities, recharge permits, recovery well permits, storage accounts and well construction, abandonment or replacement. We must file periodic reports with the ACC, ADEQArizona Corporation Commission, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and ADWR.
Arizona Department of Water Resources.

Within each regulatory organization, we have invested in developing cooperative relationships at all levels, from staff to executives to elected orand appointed officials. These relationships, coupled with our proactive attitude toward regulatory compliance, have resulted in a number of significantly positive regulatory determinations.

Assured and Adequate Water Supply Regulations

We intend to seek access to renewable water supplies as we grow our water resource portfolio. However, we currently rely almost exclusively (and are likely to continue to rely) on the pumping of groundwater and the generation and delivery of recycled water for non-potable uses to meet future demands in our service areas. Aside from some rights to water through the Central Arizona Project, groundwater (and recycled water derived from groundwater) is the only water supply available to us.

Although we intend to rely on recycled water to help meet water demands in areas, the infrastructure, permits, and customer base necessary to generate and deliver recycled water are not necessarily in place in most of our service areas. In addition, although recycling can extend a limited supply, it does not actually generate a new supply of water. As such, although our proposed generation and delivery of recycled water is likely to help substantially reduce the amount of groundwater that will be required to serve future customers, our ability to serve new customers will remain dependent on its ability to access groundwater. Groundwater is a limited resource in Arizona, and access to new uses of groundwater is closely regulated in the areas served by us. See “Risk Factors—Inadequate water and wastewater supplies could have a material adverse effect upon our ability to achieve the customer growth necessary to increase our revenues.”

Nearly all of our service areas are located in “Active Management Areas,” areas within which the use of groundwater is regulated by the Arizona Department of Water Resources in order to manage ongoing problems with groundwater overdraft. The Phoenix, Prescott and Tucson Active Management Areas are legally mandated to achieve “safe yield” by 2025 or sooner. However, we do not expect any of these Active Management Areas to achieve their safe yield goals. Safe yield requires groundwater pumping to not draw down the groundwater aquifers, or “over-draft,” as all pumping is offset or replaced within the Active Management Area from a renewable supply. The Pinal Active Management Area, which encompasses our major service areas near Maricopa, is managed to allow development of non-irrigation uses and to preserve existing agricultural economies in the Active Management Area for as long as feasible, consistent with the necessity to preserve future water supplies for non-irrigation uses.

Under Arizona’s assured water supply laws and regulations, a new subdivision inside an Active Management Area must demonstrate that it has an “assured water supply” to the satisfaction of the Arizona Department of Water Resources before the developer is permitted to sell lots. Demonstration of an assured water supply requires, among other things, that an applicant demonstrate that water supplies will be physically, continuously, and legally available to satisfy the water needs of the proposed use for at least 100 years. A developer may make an independent showing of an assured water supply (resulting in a Certificate of Assured Water Supply for a subdivision) or may obtain a written commitment for service from a designated water supplier, such as a privately owned water company or a municipal water supplier. Under the latter approach, the water supplier must demonstrate satisfaction of assured water supply requirements for the developments within its service areas (resulting in a Designation of Assured Water Supply for the provider). At present, we have obtained a Designation of Assured Water Supply in the Maricopa/Casa Grande service territory (Santa Cruz) for approximately 22,900 acre-feet of groundwater use. A Designation of Assured Water Supply is subject to periodic review and renewal by the Arizona Department of Water Resources, and can be increased as demand grows within the service territory, subject to the physical availability of water. A recent physical availability determination for Santa Cruz suggests that, over time, its Designation of Assured Water Supply could potentially be increased to approximately 45,000 acre-feet once sufficient increased demand is established in the area, assuming that water is still physically available by that time (i.e., the groundwater has not been committed to users in surrounding areas). Under our high efficiency Total Water Management model, which is intended to achieve much lower per-unit potable water use rates than would be expected for average developments, 45,000 acre-feet could be sufficient water supply for approximately 180,000 homes per year.

In our West Valley service territory (Greater Tonopah), we expect to receive a Designation of Assured Water Supply when development commences in that area for 10,428 acre-feet with the ability to access the reserved physical availability of an additional 38,100 acre-feet as population grows. Assuming implementation of our high-efficiency Total Water Management model throughout the service area, this could be a sufficient water supply for approximately 250,000 homes.

In our other service areas, we rely upon a Certificate of Assured Water Supply obtained by developers to demonstrate an assured water supply.

Outside of Arizona’s Active Management Areas, the “adequate water supply” program requires a determination of whether there is an adequate water supply—similar to an assured water supply—but it does not necessarily foreclose development when the showing cannot be made. Unless the county government has voted to make the requirement mandatory, a development (outside of Active Management Areas) that cannot demonstrate access to an adequate water supply is generally required only to disclose this fact, although as a practical matter few developments have proceeded on this basis. In addition, whether a water provider to such a development has access to an adequate water supply is nevertheless relevant to its business.

Other Environmental, Health and Safety and(including Water QualityQuality) Matters

Our operations also involve the use, storage and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes. For example, our water and wastewater treatment facilities store and use chlorine and other chemicals and generate wastes that

require proper handling and disposal under applicable environmental requirements.regulations. We could also could incur remedial costs in connection with any environmental contamination relating to our operations or facilities, releases or our off-site disposal of wastes. Although we are not aware of any material cleanup or decontamination obligations, the discovery of contamination or the imposition of such obligations arising under relevant federal, state and local laws and regulations in the future could result in additional costs. Our facilities and operations also are subject to requirements under the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act and similar laws in ArizonaArizona.

Our compliance with all of the environmental, health and aresafety (including water quality) requirements described above may be subject to inspections thereunder.

and enforcement measures by federal, state and local agencies.

Security

Due to terroristsecurity, vandalism, terrorism and other risks, we take precautions to protect our employees and the water delivered to our customers. In 2002, federal legislation was enacted that resulted in new regulations concerning security of water facilities, including submitting vulnerability assessment studies to the federal government. We have complied with EPA regulations concerning vulnerability assessments and have made filings to the EPA as required. Vulnerability assessments are conducted regularly to evaluate the effectiveness of existing security controls and serve as the basis for further capital investment in security for the facility. Information security controls are deployed or integrated to prevent unauthorized access to company information systems, assure the continuity of business processes dependent upon automation, ensure the integrity of our data and to support regulatory and legislative compliance requirements. In addition, communication plans have been developed as a component of our procedures. While we do not make public comments on the details of our security programs, we have been in contact with federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies to coordinate and improve the security of our water delivery systems and to safeguard our water supply.

Litigation
Sonoran Litigation
In June 2005,

Competition

As an owner and operator of regulated utilities, we acquireddo not face competition within our existing service areas because Arizona law provides the assets used to operate certain utilities (the “387 Districts”) from Sonoran Utility Services, LLC (“Sonoran”)holder of a Certificate of Convenience and assumed management responsibilityNecessity for the 387 Districts’ water and wastewater services.service with an exclusive right to provide that service within the certificated area. In June 2007, Sonoran added Global Water Resources, LLCaddition, the high cost of constructing water and its utility subsidiaries, Global Water-Santa Cruzwastewater systems in an existing market creates a barrier to entry. We do, however, face competition from other water and wastewater utilities for new service areas and with respect to the acquisition of smaller utilities. We believe our principal competitors for new service areas and acquisitions in Arizona are EPCOR, Arizona Water Company and Global Water-Palo Verde Utilities Company, (the “Global Defendants”) as defendantsLiberty Water. We believe competition for new service areas and acquisitions is based on relationships with municipalities and developers, experience in making acquisitions, the ability to an action pending beforefinance and obtain regulatory approval, quality and breadth of products and services, the Maricopa County Arizona Superior Court (Case CV2006-018576).

Sonoran alleges contract and tort claims against the Global Defendants (as well as the other named defendants) leading upability to and arising out of our purchase of the 387 Districts’ assets from Sonoran.


71


Specifically, Sonoran claims the Global Defendants breached the implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing, intentionally interfered with contractual relations, and conspired to deprive Sonoran of its interests in the 387 Districts by making false and disparaging statements about Sonoran to landowners and urging landowners to procureintegrate both water and wastewater services and emplace conservation practices throughout the service areas, price, speed and ease of implementation.

If we seek to extend our services outside Arizona, we will face competition from our company in violation of the landowners’ contractual obligations with Sonoran, which ultimately led to the landowners and other named defendants breachingand/regional or terminating their contracts with Sonoran. Sonoran alleges that the combined effect of these actions forced them to sell their company to us. Further, Sonoran claims that the Global Defendants breached their contractual obligations under the purchase agreement with Sonoran by failing to make payments when such payments became due.

In the Sonoran litigation, the plaintiff is seeking unspecified damages, punitive damages, exemplary damages, attorneys’ fees and court costs, together with such other relief as the court deems proper. We do not believe our company is liable national water utilities for these claims and intend to defend vigorously against them.
WMC Claim
In addition, in March 2008 we filed an indemnification claim against the former shareholders of West Maricopa Combine, Inc. (“WMC”), which we acquired pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement dated May 9, 2006 among Global Water, Inc. and the shareholders of WMC (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”). Our claim asserts $20.1 million in estimated losses arising out of whatopportunities.

Although we believe to be materially inaccurate shareholder representationswe compete effectively in our regulated businesses, our competitors may have more resources and warranties contained inexperience than we have and may therefore have a competitive advantage. See “Risk Factors—We face competition for new service areas and acquisition targets.”

Our Properties

The following table lists the Stock Purchase Agreement. The representations and warranties are secured by a right of setoff against future annual growth premium paymentsproperties that are required under the Stock Purchase Agreement and conclude on March 31, 2012. As a result, pending resolution of our indemnification claim, we will pay the required growth premium payments into escrow in accordance with the provisions of the Stock Purchase Agreement. We are unable to predict the likelihoodown or extent of recovery on our claim.

Arizona Water Disputes
Several of our CC&N extension requests are being contested by Arizona Water Company before the ACC. These extension requests are in various stages of administrative litigation. The largest request involves our Southeast Extension Area (DocketNo. SW-03575A-05-0926 et al.) the “Southeast Docket”), which is over 19,000 acres. In addition, Arizona Water Company has challenged our 1,494 acre extension request to serve part of the Legends development (DocketNo. SW-03575A-07-0300 et al) and our request to transfer CC&N’s from some of our subsidiaries to other of our subsidiaries. (DocketNo. W-02442A-07-0485 et al). We have also challenged Arizona Water Company’s request for an extension that includes much of the area we are requesting in the Southeast Docket.
We are currently engaged in settlement discussions with Arizona Water Company regarding these matters and have reached a tentative agreement in principle. A definitive settlement agreement has not been signed, however, and even if a settlement is reached, the settlement may not be accepted or approved by the ACC. If these dockets are not resolved by settlement, we intend to vigorously support our extension requests.
In addition, on March 29, 2006, Arizona Water Company filed a formal complaint (the “Complaint”) with the ACC in DocketNo. W-01445A-06-0200 et al. (the “Complaint Docket”) against Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Resources, Inc., Global Water Management, LLC, Santa Cruz Water Company, LLC, Palo Verde Utilities Company, LLC, Global Water — Santa Cruz Water Company, and Global Water — Palo Verde Utilities Company (collectively, the “Respondents”). Arizona Water’s allegations in the Complaint Docket include, among other things that:
lease.

Nature of Property certain of the Respondents are illegally and improperly acting as public service companies;LocationOperated By

Owned or

Leased

Corporate Offices
 • Phoenix, Arizonaas public service companies, certain of the Respondents are improperly and illegally conducting business outside the regulatory authority of the ACC;


72


 • certain of the Respondents are demanding and charging illegal and improper fees from landowners and prospective utility customers located within and contiguous to Arizona Water Company’s CC&N service areas and systems;
• the ICFAs andpublic-private partnerships entered into by Global Water Resources, LLC and various landowners and municipalities are within Arizona Water Company’s CC&N areas or contiguous to its CC&N service areas and systems; andInc.Leased
Wastewater Treatment PlantMaricopa, ArizonaGlobal Water—Palo Verde Utilities CompanyOwned
Global Water Center—Regional Office the ICFAsMaricopa, ArizonaGlobal Water—Palo Verde Utilities CompanyOwned
Wastewater Utility Plant8 Lift Stations—Maricopa, ArizonaGlobal Water—Palo Verde Utilities CompanyOwned
Water Utility Plant15 Well Sites—Maricopa, ArizonaGlobal Water—Santa Cruz Water CompanyOwned
Water Utility Plant5 Water Distribution Sites—Maricopa, ArizonaGlobal Water—Santa Cruz Water CompanyOwned
Water Utility Plant9 Sites—Western Maricopa County, ArizonaWater Utility of Greater Tonopah, Inc.Owned
Water Utility Plant4 Sites—Northern Maricopa County, ArizonaWater Utility of Northern Scottsdale, Inc.Owned
Regional OfficeWillow Valley, ArizonaWillow Valley Water Co., Inc.Owned
Water Utility Plant4 Well andpublic-private partnerships are in violation of ACC practice and policy and Water Distribution Sites—Willow Valley, Arizona law.Willow Valley Water Co., Inc.Owned
Monetary damages have not been specified and are typically not awarded by the ACC. The Complaint Docket is part

Employees

As of the settlement discussions that are currently ongoing between Arizona Water Company and Respondents. The staff of the ACC has stated that resolution of “the accounting treatment of the ICFAs... [is] best reserved for an actual rate proceeding.”

The ICFAs are also under review in another ACC proceeding,In the Matter of the Commission’s Generic Evaluation of the Regulatory Impact From the Use of Non-Traditional Financing Arrangements by Water Utilities and Their Affiliates (the “Generic Docket”). On October 6, 2006, the staff of the ACC issued a staff report in the Generic Docket. This staff report included a hypothetical known as “Scenario 3” that was intended to be similar to ICFAs. The staff stated that:
[The ACC staff] concluded that ICFA type arrangements can provide appropriate long-term solutions which promote conservation of water supplies and efficient wastewater utilization. If such costs are incurred at the parent level and subsequently contributed to the regulated utility, the cost of such contributed capital should be determined on a case by case basis. However, based on the scenarios contained in this report, [the ACC staff] would recommend that these costs be treated as advances or contributions instead of equity for ratemaking purposes. (Staff Report at 7).
The ACC staff stated that this was only a “preliminary evaluation” (Staff Report at 2). The ACC has not acted on the Staff Report, and it is unclear what further steps, if any, will occur in the Generic Docket. The ACC staff has also stated that it is not certain that “Scenario 3” accurately “mimics” ICFAs. As noted above, we believe the ACC staff prefers that accounting issues related to ICFAs be resolved in a rate case. The outcome of any such rate case is unknown and cannot be predicted with any certainty.
Employees
On December 31, 2007,September 30, 2015, we had 106 full time equivalent49 full-time employees and no part-time employees. WeCurrently, none of our employees participate in collective bargaining agreements, and we consider our employee relations to be goodgood.

Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of business, we may, from time to time, be subject to various pending and threatened lawsuits in which claims for monetary damages are asserted. To our knowledge, we are not involved in any legal proceeding which is expected to have no collective bargaining agreements with any employees.


73a material effect on us.


MANAGEMENT

Directors and Executive Officers

MANAGEMENT
The following table provides information regardingBelow is a list of the names, ages, positions and a brief description of the business experience of the individuals who serve as our current executive officers and directors. Prior to the effectivenessdirectors as of this offering, we plan to identify           independent director nominees who will be elected to our board of directors, effective upon the consummation of this offering.
December 31, 2015.

Name

Age   

Position

Trevor T. Hill

   
William S. Levine7851    Chairman of the Board
Trevor T. Hill

Richard M. Alexander

   43President, CEO and Director
Daniel Cracchiolo7960    Director
Leo Commandeur

Cindy M. Bowers

   4753    Senior Vice President of Business Development and SecretaryDirector
Cindy M. Liles

William S. Levine

   4584    Senior Vice President of Growth Services and TreasurerDirector
Graham Symmonds

David C. Tedesco

   4641    Senior ViceDirector

L. Rita Theil

51Director

Ron L. Fleming

36Director(1) and President of Regulatory Affairs and Compliance and Chief TechnologyExecutive Officer

Michael J. Liebman

39Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

(1)Effective upon completion of this offering, our board of directors expects to increase the size of the board to seven members and appoint Mr. Fleming as a director.

DirectorsTrevor T. Hill. Mr. Hill is co-founder of the Company and Executive Officers

William S. Levine.  Mr. Levine serveshas served as the Chairman of our boardthe boards of directors. Prior to joining Global Water, Mr. Levine co-founded and served as Chairmandirectors of the board of directors for Outdoor Systems, now known as CBS Outdoor, an outdoor advertising/billboard firm that grew to become the largest outdoor advertising company in the nation.Company and GWRC since June 2013. Mr. LevineHill is also the co-founderfounder, chairman and majority ownerCEO of Allstate U Lok Storage Co., a chain of self-storage and mini-warehouses totaling over one million square feet of capacity. He has been a significant real estate developer, owner, operator and lender for many years and has been a general partner of Levine Investments, L.P., a real estate development limited partnership for over five years.
Trevor T. Hill.FATHOM. Previously, Mr. Hill is co-founder and serves as our President andwas the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of our board of directors.GWRC from 2003 until 2014. Prior to co-founding Global Water in 2003, heMr. Hill co-founded Algonquin Water Resources of America, a division of the Algonquin Power Income Fund, where he served as Director of Operations from 2000 to 2003. In 1994, Mr. Hill co-founded Hill, Murray & Associates, a design-build firm specializing in the construction and operation of water reclamation facilities in British Columbia and the Canadian Arctic. He retired from the Canadian Navy in 1994, after serving as an engineering officer and receiving the Gulf Kuwait Medal for his service in the 1991 Gulf War. Mr. Hill graduated from Royal Roads Military College with a degree in Mechanical Engineering in 1987. He attended the Royal Naval Engineering College in Plymouth, England and completed his post-graduate studies in 1988.

Daniel Cracchiolo.Richard M. Alexander. Mr. Cracchiolo servesAlexander has served as a memberdirector of our board of directors. He co-founded the law firm of Burch & CracchioloCompany and GWRC since December 2010. Mr. Alexander has been involved in 1970the oil and is listed in two categories of “Best Lawyers in America.”gas industry for over 40 years. Mr. CracchioloAlexander served as Deputy County Attorneythe Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of Maricopa CountyParallel Energy Trust from 1952January 2012 to 1954March 2013, and in March 2013 was named the President and Chief Executive Officer of Parallel Energy Trust. Mr. Alexander was the President and Chief Operating Officer of AltaGas Ltd. and also held the positions of Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. From 2003 to 2006, Mr. Alexander served as the Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Niko Resources Ltd., and Vice President, Investor Relations and Communications of Husky Energy Inc. from 19562001 to 1957.2003. Mr. Alexander is a director of Parallel Energy Trust, Pan Orient Energy, and Oryx Petroleum, as well as some private and not-for-profit entities. Mr. Alexander holds a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) and a Certified Management Accountant (CMA) designation. He isgraduated from Ryerson University with a Bachelor of Business Management. In November 2015, Parallel Energy Trust filed an application for protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act with the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in Calgary. Parallel Energy Trust’s wholly-owned U.S. based subsidiaries, Parallel Energy LP and Parallel Energy GP LLC, also a memberfiled for relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the boardUnited States Code. Subject to judicial approval, the wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries will sell substantially all of directors and past Presidenttheir assets to Scout Energy Group II, LP as part of Combined Metropolitan Phoenix Arts and Sciences and servesthe bankruptcy process.

Cindy M. Bowers. Ms. Bowers has served as a director of the Company since May 2013. Ms. Bowers served as the Executive Vice President and DirectorChief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of Steele Foundation, an organization dedicatedthe Company and GWRC from December 2010 to May 2014, and then served as the supportExecutive Vice President Investor Relations of charitable, religious, educational and scientific purposes. Mr. Cracchiolo has beenthe Company until the end of her employment in December 2014. Ms. Bowers served as the water business through his family-owned Bella Vista Water Company for over 50 years.

Leo Commandeur.  Mr. Commandeur is co-founder and serves as ourCompany’s Senior Vice President for Business Development and Secretary. Prior to co-founding Global Water in 2003, he co-founded Algonquin Water Resources of America where he served as Director of Business Development. Previously, Mr. Commandeur co-founded and served as Chief Financial Officer for Visionary Solution Corporation, an information technology company which was taken public in 1996 and later soldCorporate Secretary from January 2004 to a strategic buyer. Mr. Commandeur attended Selkirk College, where he studied accountingDecember 2010, and business. He then continued his accounting studies through

as the Society of Management Accountants.

Cindy M. Liles.  Ms. Liles serves as ourCompany’s Senior Vice President of Growth Services and Treasurer.Chief Operating Officer from July 2008 to December 2010. She joined Global Waterthe Company in 2004 upon the company’s first acquisitions,Company’s acquisition of the Santa Cruz Water Company and Palo Verde Utilities Company, our wholly owned subsidiaries.utilities. From 2002 until 2004, Ms. LilesBowers was an owner and served as the Chief Financial Officer and General Manager of those utilities from their inception.these utilities. She is a certified public accountant with over 2030 years of accounting and management experience with public companies including Holiday Inns Worldwide and


74


Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. Ms. LilesBowers graduated from Delta State University with a degree in Accounting.

Graham Symmonds.William S. Levine. Mr. Symmonds servesLevine has served as our Senior Vice Presidenta director of Regulatory Affairsthe Company and ComplianceGWRC from the inception of both companies. Mr. Levine served as the Chairman of the boards of directors of the Company and GWRC from the inception of both companies until June 2013. Prior to co-founding the Company, Mr. Levine co-founded and served as Chairman of the board of directors for Outfront Media, an outdoor advertising/billboard firm that grew to become the largest outdoor advertising company in the United States. Mr. Levine is also the co-founder and majority owner of Allstate U Lok Storage Co., a chain of self-storage and mini-warehouses totaling over one million square feet of capacity. He has been a significant real estate developer, owner, operator and lender for many years and has been a general partner of Levine L.P., a real estate development limited partnership for over five years.

David C. Tedesco. Mr. Tedesco has served as a director of the Company and GWRC since May 2013. Mr. Tedesco is the founder and has served as the Chief Executive Officer of True North Companies since January 2001, one of Arizona’s largest and most active private investment firms. He has founded and served as CEO of multiple successful companies and has a deep operational experience as well as investing acumen. Mr. Tedesco is a director of numerous organizations including Passport Health, Anmark Machine, Jokake Companies, HSi, ProGard, Midwest Products, CIRS, SAARC, YPO, Valley of the Sun United Way and the Nature Conservancy. Mr. Tedesco formed the Tedesco Foundation, a non-profit entity focused on providing strategic support to not-for-profit service providers in Arizona and throughout the world. Mr. Tedesco studied computer science at Iowa State and Physics at Arizona State University and is an alumnus of Harvard Business School.

L. Rita Theil. Ms. Theil has served as a director of the Company and GWRC since December 2010. Ms. Theil is a Chartered Director (C. Dir.) designated by The Directors College (a joint venture of McMaster University and The Conference Board of Canada). Since 2004, Ms. Theil has been the owner and Chief Technology Officer. In 2003, Mr. Symmonds joined Global WaterExecutive Officer of JacKryn Holdings Inc. Ms. Theil currently also acts as the Senior Vice President for regulatory and compliance matters. Prior to joining Global Water, Mr. Symmonds had joined Algonquin Water Resources of America in 2001, where he was utility manager for Arizona and Texas,a consultant responsible for all business, technicalcorporate finance to Pieridae Energy Limited. Ms Theil has served on a number of public and regulatory operations. In 1995, Mr. Symmonds joined Hill, Murray & Associatesprivate boards, including Scottish Water plc (2000 to 2009) and Sierra Geothermal Power Corp. (2007 to 2010). Ms. Theil served as Director, European Utilities at Schroder Salomon Smith Barney in London, England from 1999 to 2003 where she was responsible for the coverage of OperationsU.K. electric and developedwater utilities. Ms. Theil was an Assistant Director with Dresdner Kleinwort Benson (now DrKW) in both London, England and New York from 1994 to 1999 where she was part of the firm’s formal design control practices for membrane bioreactor water reclamation facilities. In 1986, Mr. Symmondselectricity sector privatization team. Ms. Theil has over 25 years of experience advising governments, public and private boards and global utilities companies and holds a B.Soc.Sci., LLB and MBA, each of which was commissioned as an officer in the Canadian Navy and spent nine years employed in a variety of operational and support roles. Mr. Symmonds graduatedreceived from the University of TorontoOttawa.

Ron L. Fleming. Mr. Fleming has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and GWRC since May 2015. Prior to such appointment, he served in 1985 withvarious roles at the Company, including as Interim Chief Executive Office, Chief Operating Officer, Vice President and General Manager from 2007 to 2014, and as Senior Project Manager of Engineering and Construction from 2004 to 2006. Mr.��Fleming joined the Company in 2004, crossing over from the construction industry where he worked for general contractors providing project management on numerous large-scale heavy civil infrastructure projects throughout Arizona. Mr. Fleming has over 12 years of related management and utility experience. He holds a Bachelor of Applied Sciencebachelor degree in Mechanical Engineering. He concluded his post-graduate educationConstruction Management from the School of Engineering at Northern Arizona University, with an emphasis in Heavy Civil Engineering and a minor in Business Administration. Mr. Fleming currently serves on the Royal Naval Engineering College in Plymouth, England.

Maricopa Economic Development Alliance Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors for Pinal Partnership, where he is the Co-Chair of the organization’s Water Resources Committee.

Michael J. Liebman

Immediately following. Mr. Liebman has served as Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company and GWRC since May 2014. Mr. Liebman brings over 14 years of finance and management experience. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Liebman was a Senior Director at Alvarez and Marsal, a predominant turnaround and restructuring firm in the United States, from 2002 to 2014. While at Alvarez and Marsal, Mr. Liebman provided strategic planning and interim management services to companies across various industries, including homebuilding, retail, rental/leasing, and manufacturing. During this time, he successfully negotiated the restructuring of over $3 billion in capital and raised $750 million of new capital for clients. Mr. Liebman holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Accounting from Northern Arizona University. He has passed all parts of the CPA exam and is a Certified Insolvency and Restructuring Advisor (CIRA).

Board Composition and Director Independence

Our directors are each elected to serve a term of one year and hold office until a successor is elected or qualified or until his earlier death, resignation disqualification or removal. Currently, our board of directors consists of six members. Effective upon completion of this offering, our board of directors will be comprisedexpects to increase the size of Messrs. Levine, Hill, Cracchiolothe board to 7 members and nominees to be identified prior to the effectiveness of this offering and elected effective upon its consummation. Except forappoint Mr. Hill, our directors are not, and have never been, employees of our company. Mr. Cracchiolo and our director nominees will be “independent directors,”Fleming as defined by the Nasdaq listing standards.

Our independent directors will be selected bya director.

We expect that our board of directors from possible candidates known or referredwill affirmatively determine that Mr. Levine, Mr. Alexander, Ms. Theil and Mr. Tedesco qualify as “independent directors” under the corporate governance standards of NASDAQ and the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act applicable to members of our board of directors. Our director nominees will be nominated based on their experience in business and financial matters, including relevant public company management or directorship experience, and their ability to read and understand financial statements and in the case of           because of his qualification to serve as a “financial expert” on our audit committee.

Committees of our Board of Directors

Upon the effectiveness of this offering, our

Our board of directors will establishhas established three standing committees: the audit committee, the compensation committee and the governance, nominating and governancehealth and safety committee, each of which will have the composition and responsibilities described below as of the completion of this offering:

offering. Following the closing of this offering, each committee’s charter will be posted on the investor relations section of our website.

Audit Committee

Our audit committee’s mainprimary functions will beare to oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes, internal control systems, independent auditor relationships and the audits of our financial statements. This committee’s responsibilities will include the following:

selecting and hiring our independent registered public accounting firm;

evaluating the qualifications, independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm;
• selecting and hiring our independent registered public accounting firm;
• evaluating the qualifications, independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm;
• reviewing and approving the audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm;
• reviewing the design, adequacy, implementation and effectiveness of our internal controls established for finance, accounting, legal compliance and ethics;
• reviewing the design, adequacy, implementation and effectiveness of our critical accounting and financial policies;
• overseeing and monitoring the integrity of our financial statements and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate to our financial statements of accounting matters;
• reviewing with management and our independent registered public accounting firm the results of our annual and quarterly financial statements;


75

reviewing and approving the audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm;

reviewing the design, adequacy, implementation and effectiveness of our internal controls established for finance, accounting, legal compliance and ethics;

reviewing the design, adequacy, implementation and effectiveness of our critical accounting and financial policies;

overseeing and monitoring the integrity of our financial statements and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate to our financial statements;

reviewing with management and our independent registered public accounting firm the results of our annual and quarterly financial statements;

preparing the audit committee report that the SEC requires in our annual proxy statement; and

reviewing and approving any related party transactions.


• reviewing with management and our independent registered public accounting firm any earnings announcements or other public announcements concerning our operating results;
• preparing the audit committee report that the SEC requires in our annual proxy statement; and
• reviewing and approving any related party transactions.
Our audit committee will be comprised of          , each of whom will be a non-employee membercurrently comprises Mr. Alexander, Ms. Theil and Mr. Tedesco. Mr. Alexander is currently the chair of our boardaudit committee. Upon the effectiveness of directors.           willthis offering, our audit committee is expected to remain unchanged, and Mr. Alexander is expected to continue to be the chair of theour audit committee. Our board of directors will determine that each member of our audit committee meets the requirements for independence under current SEC rules and NasdaqNASDAQ listing standards. Our board of directors will also identify, to the extent applicable, an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under SEC rules and regulations implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We intend to comply with future requirements regarding our audit committee to the extent they become applicable to us.

Compensation Committee

Our compensation committee’s primary functions will beare to monitor and assist our board of directors in determining compensation for our senior management, directors and key employees. This committee’s responsibilities will include the following:

setting performance goals for our officers and reviewing their performance against these goals;

• setting performance goals for our officers and reviewing their performance against these goals;
• reviewing and recommending compensation and benefit plans for our officers and key employees and compensation policies for our board of directors and members of our board committees;
• reviewing the terms of offer letters and employment agreements and arrangements with our officers;
• independently assessing external market information on industry compensation practices; and
• preparing the compensation committee report that the SEC requires in our annual proxy statement.
Our compensation committee will be comprisedand benefit plans for our officers and key employees and compensation policies for our board of , eachdirectors and members of whom will be a non-employee memberour board committees;

reviewing the terms of offer letters and employment agreements and arrangements with our officers; and

reviewing director compensation for service on our board of directors and any committees of our board of directors.           will

Our compensation committee currently comprises Mr. Alexander, Ms. Theil and Mr. Tedesco. Mr. Tedesco is currently the chair of our compensation committee. Upon the effectiveness of this offering, our compensation committee is expected to remain unchanged, and Mr. Tedesco is expected to continue to be the chair of theour compensation committee. Each member of this committee is a non-employee director, as defined pursuant to Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and an outside director, as defined under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Our board of directors will determine that each member of our compensation committee meets the requirements for independence under the current requirements of the SEC and NasdaqNASDAQ listing standards. We intend to comply with future requirements regarding our compensation committee to the extent they become applicable to us.

Governance, Nominating and GovernanceHealth and Safety Committee

The primary purpose of our

Our governance, nominating and governance committee will behealth and safety committee’s primary functions are to assist our board of directors by identifying individuals qualified to become directors consistent with criteria established by our board of directors. TheThis committee’s responsibilities will include the following:

evaluating the composition, size and governance of our board of directors and its committees and making recommendations regarding future planning and the appointment of directors to committees of our board of directors;

recommending to our board of directors the persons to be nominated for election as directors;

administering a policy for considering nominees for election to our board of directors;

overseeing our directors’ performance and self-evaluation process;

reviewing our corporate governance principles and providing recommendations to our board of directors regarding possible changes; and

reviewing and monitoring compliance with our code of conduct and ethics and our insider trading policy.

Our governance, nominating and health and safety committee currently comprises Mr. Alexander, Ms. Theil and Mr. Tedesco. Ms. Theil is currently the chair of our governance, nominating and health and safety committee. Upon the effectiveness of this committee will include:

• evaluating the composition, size and governance ofoffering, our board of directors and its committees and making recommendations regarding future planning and the appointment of directors to committees of our board of directors;
• administering a policy for considering nominees for election to our board of directors;
• overseeing our directors’ performance and self-evaluation process;
• developing continuing education programs for our board of directors;
• reviewing our corporate governance principles and providing recommendations to our board of directors regarding possible changes; and
• reviewing and monitoring compliance with our code of conduct and ethics and our insider trading policy.


76


Our nominating and governance committee will be comprised of          , each of whom will be a non-employee member of our board of directors.           willis expected to remain unchanged, and Ms. Theil is expected to continue to be the chair of theour governance, nominating and governancehealth and safety committee. Our board of directors will determine that each member of our governance, nominating and governancehealth and safety committee meets the requirements for independence under the current requirements of the SEC and NasdaqNASDAQ listing standards. We intend to comply with future requirements regarding our governance, nominating and governancehealth and safety committee to the extent they become applicable to us.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of our executive officers will serve as a member of our compensation committee, and none of them has served, or will be permitted to serve, on the compensation committee (or any other committee serving a similar function) of any entity of which an executive officer is expected to serve as a member of our compensation committee.

Majority Voting Policy

Our entire board of directors made all compensation decisions priorexpects to adopt a policy which provides that, if the total number of votes withheld exceeds the number of votes cast in favor of a director nominee, the director must immediately submit his or her resignation to the creationChairman of our compensation committee. See “—Compensation Discussionboard of directors, to be effective when accepted by our board of directors. Our governance, nominating and Analysis.”

Codehealth and safety committee would then consider and make a recommendation to our board of Business and Financial Conduct and Corporate Governance Guidelines
directors regarding the resignation. A director who tenders a resignation pursuant to this policy will not participate in any meeting of our board of directors or any board sub-committee at which the resignation is considered. Our codeboard of directors will accept the resignation absent exceptional circumstances. If a resignation is accepted, our board of directors may: (i) leave the vacancy unfilled until the next annual stockholders’ meeting; (ii) appoint a new director to fill the vacancy; or (iii) call a special stockholders’ meeting to fill the vacancy. This policy would apply only to uncontested elections—that is, elections in which the number of director nominees is equal to the number of directors to be elected.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics referred

Our board of directors expects to asadopt a written code of business conduct and ethics (the “Code”). The Code is intended to document the Code, appliesprinciples of conduct and ethics to be followed by all of our directors, officers and employees. We believe the CodeIts purpose is reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conduct, including:including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest;interest. Following the closing of this offering, the full fair and accurate disclosuretext of the Code will be posted on the investor relations section of our website. We intend to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of the Code, or waivers of these provisions, on our website or in filings under the Exchange Act.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Overview

This section explains how our compensation program is designed and other public communications made by us; complianceoperated with applicable laws; prompt internal reporting of violations ofrespect to our executives, specifically the Code; and accountability for adherence to the Code.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
The following discussion and analysis of compensation arrangements of our named executive officers for 2007 should be read together with2014 (“NEOs”):

Trevor T. Hill, President and Chief Executive Officer (through January 2014)

Ron L. Fleming, President and Chief Executive Officer (effective January 2015; interim CEO from May 2014 to January 2015)

Michael J. Liebman, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary (effective May 2014)

Cindy M. Bowers, Chief Financial Officer (through May 2014)

Brett B. Higginbotham, Vice President, Accounting (through October 2014)

Historically, our Board, based on recommendations made by the compensation tablescommittee, has made decisions regarding salaries, annual bonuses and related disclosures set forth below. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based onincentive compensation for our current plans, considerations, expectationsexecutive officers and determinations regarding future compensation programs. The actual amountemployees and form of compensationapproves corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation programs that we adopt may differ materially from currently planned programs as summarized in this discussion.

Compensation Process
We developed and implemented our current executive compensation program as a private limited liability company. As a result, our compensation programs and the processes by which they were developed have been less formal that those typically employed by public companies. In lieu of a formally established compensation committee, our Chairman established our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, and the Chief Executive Officer recommended, and the fullour other executive officers. Our board of directors approved,solicits input from the Chief Executive Officer and the compensation arrangementscommittee regarding the performance of our other executive officers.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth all compensation paid or payable from the Company in respect of each of the NEOs for services rendered during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Name and principal position

 Year  Salary
$
  Bonus
$(1)
  Stock
awards
$(2)
  Option
awards
$(3)
  Non-equity
incentive plan
compensation
$(4)
  All other
compensation
$(5)
  Total
compensation
$
 

Trevor T. Hill(6)

  2014    248,077    62,741    —      —      188,221    —      499,039  

President and Chief

  2013    350,000    —      —      —      700,000    4,007    1,054,007  

Executive Officer

        

Ron L. Fleming(7)

  2014    190,385    35,000    70,000    —      35,000    6,604    336,989  

President and Chief

  2013    137,500    —      6,484    —      75,250    2,262    221,496  

Executive Officer

        

Michael J. Liebman(8)

  2014    190,385    29,711    59,423    —      29,712    —      309,231  

Chief Financial Officer

  2013    35,988    —      9,654    —      10,796    —      56,438  

and Corporate Secretary

        

Cindy M. Bowers(9)

  2014    188,462    33,284    —      —      99,851    3,479    325,076  

Chief Financial Officer

  2013    250,000    —      —      —      175,000    3,914    428,914  

Brett B. Higginbotham(10)

  2014    124,847    —      —      —      —      17,155    142,002  

Vice President, Accounting

  2013    140,000    —      15,649    —      17,500    —      173,149  

(1)Represents discretionary bonuses earned by our NEOs in 2014. For more information regarding how these bonuses were determined, see below under the heading “Annual Incentive Awards—Achievement Levels and Outcomes Under 2014 Incentive Program.”
(2)

Represents awards of PSUs. The PSUs that were awarded pursuant to our 2013 Incentive Program (shown as compensation for 2013 in the table above) were issued during the first quarter of 2014 upon determination of achievement of the pre-determined performance criteria, which were approved during the first quarter of 2013. The PSUs that were awarded pursuant to our 2014 Incentive Program (shown as compensation for 2014 in the table above) were issued during the first quarter of 2015 upon determination

of achievement of the pre-determined performance criteria, which were approved during the first quarter of 2014. The value of such awards presented above represents the grant date fair value of the expected cash payment of such PSUs upon vesting using the price of GWRC’s common shares on the date the awards were granted and assuming 100% achievement of the performance goals set forth in the applicable Incentive Program (which the Company considered the probable outcome on the award date). For more information regarding our Incentive Programs, see below under the heading “Annual Incentive Awards.” For GAAP accounting purposes, PSUs are accounted for as liability compensatory awards under ASC 710, “Compensation—General.”
(3)Represents the grant date intrinsic value of SARs granted to Messrs. Fleming and Liebman on July 1, 2013 and November 14, 2013, respectively, calculated in accordance with ASC 710, “Compensation—General.” For more information regarding the Company’s accounting treatment of the SARs, see Note 12 (Deferred Compensation Awards) to our consolidated financial statements included in this prospectus.
(4)Represents amounts earned and payable in cash to our NEOs pursuant to our 2013 Incentive Program and 2014 Incentive Program, respectively. The amounts shown as 2014 compensation for Mr. Hill and Ms. Bowers, respectively, reflect the Board’s decision to pay all of their incentive compensation under the 2014 Incentive Program (including the amounts otherwise payable in the form of PSUs) in cash, as described in more detail below. For more information regarding our Incentive Programs, see below under the heading “Annual Incentive Awards.”
(5)Represents matching contributions to our 401(k) plan. For Mr. Higginbotham only, amount includes $6,700 of severance paid during 2014. Additionally, in connection with Mr. Higginbotham’s termination, we paid him $10,400 as final settlement for any PSU or stock option award benefits to which he was entitled.
(6)Mr. Hill stepped down as our President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 2014. Effective January 1, 2015, Mr. Hill is no longer employed by us. Mr. Hill did not receive any compensation in 2014 for his role as Chairman of the Board.
(7)Mr. Fleming was named our President and Interim Chief Executive Officer effective May 2014. Effective January 1, 2015, Mr. Fleming became our permanent Chief Executive Officer.
(8)Effective May 2014, Mr. Liebman became our Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary.
(9)Ms. Bowers completed her term as our Chief Financial Officer effective May 2014 and stepped down from her role as our Executive Vice President of Investor Relations effective December 2014. Ms. Bowers did not receive any compensation in 2014 for her role as a member of our Board.
(10)Effective October 3, 2014, Mr. Higginbotham is no longer an employee of the Company.

Overview of Executive Compensation Program; Components of Compensation

Our executive compensation program is designed to retain, motivate and reward our NEOs and other executive officers namedfor their performance and contribution to our long-term success. We seek to compensate our NEOs and other executive officers by combining short and long-term incentives. We also seek to reward the achievement of corporate and individual performance objectives, and to align the interests of our NEOs and other executive officers with those of our stockholders by rewarding the creation of long-term value through equity-linked compensation. We tie individual goals to the area of the NEO’s primary responsibility. These goals may include the achievement of specific financial or business development goals. We set corporate performance goals that reach across various business areas and include achievements in finance/business development and corporate development.

Executive compensation consists primarily of three elements: base salary, annual incentive awards, and long-term incentive awards. Each element of compensation is described in more detail below.

Base Salary

Base salaries for our NEOs are established based on the scope of their responsibilities and their prior relevant experience, taking into account competitive market compensation paid by other companies in our industry for similar positions and the overall market demand for such executives at the time of hire. Subject to the provisions of his or her employment agreement (if any), an executive’s base salary is also determined by reviewing the executive’s other forms of compensation to ensure that the executive’s total compensation is in line with our overall compensation philosophy.

The public companies that served as the comparative group in setting base salaries were: The York Water Company, Artesian Resources Corp., Connecticut Water Service Inc., and Middlesex Water Co. The four comparator companies were chosen based on the following selection criteria:

(1)public water utilities of similar size, or

(2)public water utilities with whom we may compete for executive talent.

In 2014, Mr. Hill and Ms. Bowers stepped down from their roles as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, through a structured executive transition plan. Mr. Hill continues as Chairman of our board of directors and Ms. Bowers as a member of our board of directors. In setting base salaries for Mr. Hill’s and Ms. Bowers’ respective successors, Messrs. Fleming and Liebman, our board of directors did not select a percentile or similar measure within the range of salaries in the comparator group to set the salaries of our current Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. In this regard, the base salaries for Messrs. Fleming and Liebman are dictated by the terms of their employment agreements. See “Employment Agreements” below for additional information. However, the salaries of Messrs. Fleming and Liebman are within the ranges of the comparator group. In setting the base salaries for our other NEOs, our board of directors considered each executive officer’s tenure and responsibilities, and the other components of their total compensation for the year.

Base salaries of our NEOs are reviewed annually and, subject to the provisions of our employment agreements with the NEOs (if any), may be increased for merit reasons based on any NEO’s success in meeting or exceeding individual objectives. Additionally, base salaries may be adjusted as warranted throughout the year for promotions or other changes in the scope or breadth of an NEO’s role or responsibilities. Our board of directors believes that the 2014 base salaries for our NEOs were competitive with that paid by the comparator companies and fairly reflected individual performance and contribution.

Annual Incentive Awards

The compensation program provides for an annual incentive award designed to reward our NEOs for their individual and corporate performance in a given fiscal year. The compensation committee assesses the level of the NEO’s achievement of company-wide goals. The annual incentive award may be paid in cash, PSUs, or stock options, which is decided by our board of directors at the time of issuance to the extent not specified in an NEO’s employment agreement. Stock options are issued under the stock option plan approved by GWRC’s shareholders at the 2012 GWRC annual and special meeting (the “GWRC Stock Option Plan”). In 2013 and 2014, except as described below in the cases of Mr. Hill and Ms. Bowers, the annual incentive awards were payable 50% in cash and 50% in the form of PSUs.

2014 Incentive Program

The compensation committee, together with our board of directors, set performance objectives and targets in connection with adopting our Incentive Program on an annual basis. Our 2014 Incentive Program, adopted in February 2014, was designed to allow us to pursue the Company’s mission statement, adhere to our primary service and compliance mandates, and generate sufficient free cash flow to facilitate a sustainable dividend and improve shareholder value. The 2014 Incentive Program incorporated company-wide goals that were required to be satisfied at specified levels in order for an NEO to receive payments in respect of awards made under the Incentive Program.

Company Goals

The 2014 Incentive Program incorporated two categories of company-wide goals, which were characterized as “gates” (each releasing a specified percentage of the overall incentive pool for each officer based on his or her targeted award percentage) and “components” (determining the size of the incentive pool on a weighted-average basis based on his or her targeted award percentage). The individual gates and components, and the Company’s levels of achievement relating thereto in 2014, are summarized below:

Gates

  No.   Description   % Incentive Pool    Outcome/Achievement in 2014
  1 Initiate and sustain quarterly dividend  75%           Achieved
  2 Performance of GWRC common shares relative to industry peers (as determined by the Board)  25%           Achieved

 

Components

 

  No.   Description   % Incentive Pool    Outcome/Achievement in 2014
  1 Company EBITDA (excluding non-recurring items, deferred compensation and other items, in each case, as determined by the Board)  50%           75% achievement (37.5% of incentive pool)
  2 Safety and compliance  25%           50% achievement (12.5% of incentive pool)
  3 Actual capital expenditures vs. budget  25%           100% achievement (25% of incentive pool)
  TOTALS  100%           75% of incentive pool achieved

In addition to the components discussed above, the 2014 Incentive Program included an additional award opportunity related to a stretch EBITDA goal. For 2014, if actual Company EBITDA (excluding non-recurring items, deferred compensation and other items as determined by the Board) exceeded the 100% award level of Component 1 (discussed above), 20% of such excess amount would be added to the overall incentive pool and distributed pro rata to the plan participants (based on their respective payouts under the incentive pool). For 2014, as discussed above, the Company EBITDA goal was only achieved at the 75% level and, accordingly, no awards were earned with respect to this additional award component.

Achievement Levels and Outcomes Under 2014 Incentive Program

Based on actual outcomes in respect of the “gates” and “components” comprising our 2014 Incentive Program, 75% of the overall incentive pool was earned by each of our NEOs (other than Mr. Higginbotham, who was no longer employed by the Company at December 31, 2014). The cash portion of this award for each NEO is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table below. We referunder the heading “Non-equity incentive plan compensation.” In addition, the Board determined that, in light of the Company’s exceptional performance and success during 2014, including the implementation of a cash dividend, stock price growth, receipt of funds in connection with the 2014 rate case settlement and positive growth in new connections (including re-establishing service on existing previously vacant homes), it would pay Messrs. Hill, Fleming and Liebman and Ms. Bowers an additional cash bonus equal to 25% of the executive officers namedincentive pool, effectively awarding them an incentive pool payout at the 100% achievement level. This additional discretionary cash bonus is reflected for each NEO in the Summary Compensation Table asunder the “named executive officers” in this prospectus.

As we gain experienceheading “Bonus.”

Target Annual Incentive Awards for 2014 and 2015

The target annual incentive awards for fiscal 2014 and 2015 were determined as a public company, we expect thatpercentage of base salary, as set out below (together with actual awards earned pursuant to the specific direction, emphasis and components of our compensation program will evolve and become more formalized. For example, upon the effectiveness of this offering, we will establish a Compensation Committee of the board of directors that will be comprised of directors who are “independent” as defined by Nasdaq Stock Market standards. The Compensation Committee will make all future decisions regarding the compensation of our executive officers, which will begin with 2009 compensation. See “—Committees of our Board of Directors—Compensation Committee.”


77

2014 Incentive Program):


Name

  2014 Salary
$
   2014 Target
Incentive
Award as
Percentage of
Base Salary(1)
  2014 Actual
Cash
Incentive &
Discretionary
Bonus
Earned
$(2)
  2014 Actual
PSU Award
$
   2015 Salary
$
   2015 Target
Incentive
Award as
Percentage of
Base Salary
 

Trevor T. Hill(3)

   248,077     100  250,962(1)   —       —       N/A  

Ron L. Fleming

   190,385     70  70,000    70,000     250,000     50

Michael J. Liebman

   190,385     60  59,423    59,423     225,000     35

Cindy M. Bowers(4)

   188,462     70  133,135(1)   —       —       N/A  

Brett B. Higginbotham(5)

   124,847     50  —      —       —       N/A  

The following discussion focuses on our compensation philosophy and framework for 2007 and discusses any material changes in these areas that were applicable to 2008 compensation decisions.
Compensation Philosophy
Our compensation and benefits programs seek to attract and retain talented, qualified senior executives to manage and lead our company and to motivate them to pursue and achieve our corporate objectives. Our compensation program for 2007 focused on:
(1)
• fixed annualPursuant to the 2014 Incentive Program and our Employment Agreements with Messrs. Fleming and Liebman, 50% of each NEO’s target incentive award was payable in cash compensation primarilyand 50% was payable in the form of base salaries, which represented the majorityPSUs. However, rather than paying Mr. Hill and Ms. Bowers 50% of total annual cash compensation and are designed to recognize the experience, skills, knowledge and responsibilities required of our executive officers;
• to a lesser extent, discretionary annual cash bonuses that are designed to focus attention on short-term strategic objectives and reward superior individual performance; and
• retirement paytheir respective awards in the form of 401(k) plan deferralsPSUs, the Board decided to pay their full incentive awards in cash. Accordingly, the amounts that would have otherwise been paid to Mr. Hill and Company matching contributions for executive officersMs. Bowers in the form PSUs have been included in the “2014 Actual Cash Incentive & Discretionary Bonus Earned” column in the table above. The Board’s decision to pay these amounts in cash was intended to reduce the potential exposure to increased expense in our financial statements resulting from PSU re-measurement in the event that the price of GWRC’s common shares increases.
(2)Includes amounts paid in 2015 related to 2014. Amounts include cash incentives earned pursuant to the 2014 Incentive Program, as well as discretionary bonuses in the following amounts earned by the NEOs as described above: Mr. Hill, $62,741; Mr. Fleming, $35,000; Mr. Liebman, $29,711; and employees generally, which are designedMs. Bowers, $33,284.
(3)Mr. Hill stepped down as our President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 2014. Effective January 1, 2015, Mr. Hill is no longer employed by us. Mr. Hill’s salary was reduced from $350,000 in 2013 to enable employees$250,000 in 2014 when he stepped down from his position as our Chief Executive Officer in January 2014.
(4)Ms. Bowers completed her term as our Chief Financial Officer effective May 2014 and stepped down from her role as our Executive Vice President of Investor Relations effective December 2014. Ms. Bowers’ salary was reduced from $250,000 per year to accumulate capital for their future economic security.$150,000 per year when she completed her term as Chief Financial Officer in May 2014.
(5)Effective October 3, 2014, Mr. Higginbotham is no longer an employee of the Company.

Long-Term Incentive Awards

The compensation program includes long-term incentive awards that are designed to reward our NEOs and other executive officers for our overall performance and strengthen the long-term view and alignment of interests between our NEOs (and other executive officers) and our stockholders by linking their holdings and a portion of their compensation to the future value of our equity securities. Long-term incentive awards are provided through PSUs, the GWRC Stock Option Plan, and SARs, each as described below. The compensation committee, together with our board of directors, sets objectives and targets based on our performance. Previous grants are not necessarily taken into account when considering new grants. The PSUs awarded to our NEOs during 2013 and 2014 are discussed above. The only other long-term incentive awards made in 2013 and 2014 were the SAR awards made to Messrs. Fleming and Liebman, which are described in more detail below.

Phantom Stock Unit Plan

We did nothave adopted a phantom stock unit plan (the “PSU Plan”) authorizing our Board to issue PSUs to our employees, including our NEOs. The value of the PSUs issued under the PSU Plan (including PSUs granted pursuant to our annual Incentive Programs, as described above) tracks the performance of GWRC’s common shares and provides the holder the right to receive a cash payment, the value of which will be the market value of the equivalent number of common shares at the maturity date. PSU awards are generally credited with additional PSUs in respect to dividends issued on the common shares. If dividends are credited, the number of additional PSUs credited to the awards would be equal to the aggregate amount of the dividends that would have been paid to the participant if the PSUs subject to the award had been common shares divided by the market value of a common share on the date on which the dividends are paid. The PSUs vest immediately upon a change of control with respect to the Company if a participant is terminated without cause or terminates employment for “good reason” within 12 months following a change of control of the Company. There is no exercise price attached to the awards.

The PSU Plan will remain in effect following the Reorganization Transaction and this offering, neither of which will constitute a change of control for purposes of the PSU Plan, provided that the value of the PSUs will track the performance of the Company’s common stock going forward.

Stock Option Plan

Compensation may be provided to our NEOs and other executive officers through the granting of options under the GWRC Stock Option Plan. Historically, the GWRC Stock Option Plan has been used to attract, retain and motivate NEOs, other executive officers and directors to operate and manage the business in a manner that will provide for our long-term growth and profitability by providing such persons with the opportunity, through stock options, to acquire a proprietary interest in GWRC.

GWRC’s board of directors has delegated to the compensation committee responsibility for administering the GWRC Stock Option Plan and approving all stock options granted thereunder and determining the entitlement, vesting, exercise price and all other matters relating to the GWRC Stock Option Plan.

On January 9, 2012, options were granted under the GWRC Stock Option Plan to purchase 385,697 common shares (representing approximately 4.4% of GWRC’s issued and outstanding common shares). The options vested in equal installments over the eight quarters of 2012 and 2013 and expire four years after the date of issuance.

No awards were granted under the GWRC Stock Option Plan in 2013 or 2014. Following the Reorganization Transaction, the GWRC Stock Option Plan will be assumed by the Company and will remain in effect, provided that stock options granted after the consummation of the Reorganization Transaction will be in the form of options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock (and all then outstanding stock options will be converted into options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, with the exercise prices being converted to U.S. dollars upon the consummation of the Reorganization Transaction). Neither the Reorganization Transaction nor this offering constitute a change of control for purposes of the GWRC Stock Option Plan.

Stock Appreciation Rights Plan

We have adopted a stock appreciation rights plan (the “SAR Plan”) authorizing our Board to grant long-term incentives such as options, restricted stock or stock appreciation rights to our named executive officers during 2007 based principallyemployees, including our NEOs. The value of the SARs issued under the plan tracks the performance of GWRC’s common shares and provides the holder the right to receive a cash payment, upon exercise, equal to the difference, if any between the fair market value of one GWRC common share at the date of exercise over the fair market value of one GWRC common share on the expensegrant date.

On July 1, 2013, we granted 100,000 SARs to Mr. Fleming, who is an NEO (the “Fleming SARs”). The Fleming SARs vest ratably over 16 quarters from the grant date and give Mr. Fleming the right to receive a cash payment equal to the difference between CAD$2.00 per share and the closing price of the common shares on the exercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of CAD$2.00 per share. The exercise price was determined by taking the weighted average share price for the five trading days prior to July 1, 2013. The award contains a provision that allows for an 18-month acceleration of vesting upon a change in control in accordance with the terms of the SAR agreement.

On November 14, 2013, we would incur asgranted 100,000 SARs to Mr. Liebman (the “Liebman SARs”). The Liebman SARs vest ratably over 16 quarters from the grant date and give Mr. Liebman the right to receive a resultcash payment equal to the difference between CAD$3.38 per share and the closing price of such grants. We also considered the existing equity ownership positionscommon shares on the exercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of our named executive officers,CAD$3.38 per share. The exercise price was determined by taking the weighted average share price for the 30 trading days prior to November 14, 2013. The award contains a provision that allows for a 12-month acceleration of vesting upon a change in control in accordance with the terms of the SAR agreement.

The SAR Plan will remain in effect following the Reorganization Transaction and this offering, neither of which alignwill constitute a change of control for purposes of the executive’s long-term economic interestsSAR agreements with thoseMessrs. Fleming and Liebman, provided that (i) the exercise prices will be converted to U.S. dollars upon the consummation of our company. Specifically,the Reorganization Transaction and (ii) the value of the SARs will track the performance of the Company’s common stock going forward.

Employment Agreements

Each of Mr. HillFleming and Mr. Commandeur have owned unrestricted equity sinceLiebman has entered into an employment agreement with us. Both employment agreements were executed on May 13, 2015 and provide for an initial term ending on May 13, 2019, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the company’s inception,terms thereof. Thereafter, each employment agreement will automatically renew for one or more additional 12-month periods, unless either we or the applicable NEO notifies the other party in writing by December 31 of the then current renewal term that it wishes to terminate employment under the employment agreement at the end of the term in effect.

Mr. Fleming’s employment agreement provides for an annualized base salary of $250,000 during the first calendar year of the initial term, with increases to $275,000 and Ms. Liles$300,000 as of January 1, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Mr. Liebman’s employment agreement provides for an annualized base salary of $225,000 during the first calendar year of the initial term, with increases to $235,000 and $250,000 as of January 1, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Thereafter, the Board will review each NEO’s base salary on an annual basis to determine whether any increases are appropriate based on a combination of factors, including such NEO’s achievement of specified performance objectives and/or the amount of compensation paid to his peers at other similarly situated public companies.

Each of Mr. Fleming and Mr. Symmonds were granted restricted equity awardsLiebman may also be entitled to annual incentive compensation as determined (i) in 2005 that became fully vested in 2007. We subsequentlythe discretion of the Board (or its compensation committee) or (ii) pursuant to any annual incentive compensation program adopted by the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan, however, under which our named executive officers and other employeesCompany from time to time. For each calendar year, Mr. Fleming will be eligible to receive grants of stock options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights and other stock-based equity awards. We intend to grant stock options under this plan in connection with this offering. See “—Employee Benefit Plans.”

Elements of Compensation
Base salaries.  For 2007, we determined base salaries subjectively, after reviewing salary levels for the prior year and considering the board’s independent understanding of generally prevailing compensation levels for comparable positions in the company’s industry based on its subjective view of each executive’s individual experience, performance, responsibilities and past and potential contribution to the company. Our Chief Executive Officer’s salary was established on this basis by our Chairman, while the salaries of our other executive officers were established on this basis by the board of directors based on our Chief Executive Officer’s recommendation. Salaries for 2008 were based on the same factors and determined in the same manner, except that our Chief Executive Officer reviewed compensation information related to (i) publicly-traded U.S.-based water utilities; (ii) and additional companies with comparable year-over-year revenue growth to our company. In each case, the total 2008 compensation for our executive officers was below the average compensation for similar positions in those groups.
Bonuses.  For 2007, bonuses were discretionary and were not linked to specific corporate or individual performance targets, although we did consider subjectively whether corporate and individual performance supported the amounts paid. We did not have a formal bonus plan or policy, although it has been our practice to pay a bonus equal to approximately 25% of base salary to our named executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer, whose bonus is also discretionary. During 2007, our named executive officers received bonuses ranging from 27% to 29% of their base salaries based on their respective individual performances and contributions to our growth. Our Chief Executive Officer received a bonus equalup to 50% of his then current base salary as a cash bonus and up to 50% of his then current

base salary as incentive compensation in the form of PSUs. For each calendar year, Mr. Liebman will be eligible to receive up to 35% of his then current base salary as a cash bonus and up to 35% of his then current base salary as incentive compensation in the form of PSUs. The actual percent of incentive compensation paid to Messrs. Fleming and/or Liebman, as applicable, will be based on satisfying the performance goals for each calendar year as determined by the Board (or its compensation committee) and calculated in accordance with the bonus payments for all Company employees.

The employment agreements also contain provisions in respect of the NEOs’ eligibility to receive certain benefits (including reimbursement of business expenses and health and medical benefits), as well as non-disclosure, non-competition and non-solicitation provisions binding on each of the NEOs. For additional information regarding amounts payable to Messrs. Fleming and Liebman in connection with a termination of employment and/or a change of control of with respect to the Company, see below under “Termination and Change of Control Payments.”

Termination and Change of Control Payments

If a NEO voluntarily terminates his effortsor her employment without “Good Reason” (as defined in expandingthe Employment Agreements) or if we terminate the NEO’s employment for “Cause” (as defined in the Employment Agreements), the NEO is only entitled to the payment of current base salary until the date of termination and any incentive compensation earned in a previous year but not paid.

If a NEO terminates his or her employment with Good Reason or if we terminate the NEO’s employment without Cause, the NEO is entitled to the payment of current base salary until the date of termination and any incentive compensation earned in a previous year but not paid. The NEO is also entitled to a pro rata incentive payment, payable at such time as incentive compensation is otherwise payable to employees under the incentive compensation program, if the termination of employment is during the last six months of our businessfiscal year. In addition, any equity-based awards previously granted to the NEO will become fully vested and exercisable and all restrictions on restricted awards will lapse. The NEO will also be entitled to lump-sum cash payments equal to the sum of (i) a multiple (reflected in the table below) of the relevant NEO’s then-current salary, and (ii) a multiple (reflected in the table below) of the amount of incentive compensation earned by the relevant NEO during the year immediately preceding the NEO’s termination of employment. We are obligated to pay this amount within 60 days following the NEO’s termination of employment.

If a NEO dies or becomes disabled, the NEO is entitled to the payment of current base salary until the date of death or disability and any incentive compensation earned in a previous year but not paid. The NEO is also entitled to a pro rata incentive payment, payable at such time as incentive compensation is otherwise payable to employees under the incentive compensation program. Any equity-based awards previously granted to the executive will become fully vested and exercisable and all restrictions on restricted stock awards will lapse and the NEO must exercise any options within the shorter of the expiration time of the options or one year from the death or disability.

Any payments to the NEOs upon termination of employment (other than in connection with a “Change of Control” (as defined in the Employment Agreements)) and disability are conditional upon the executive executing a release in favor of us and our continued improvementaffiliates, directors, officers, employees and agents.

In the event that (i) a NEO resigns his or her employment for Good Reason, or (ii) we terminate the employment of any of the NEOs without Cause, in our financial and operational performance. We anticipate that 2008 bonuseseach case within 18 months of a Change of Control, each of the NEOs will continuebe entitled to be awarded onlump-sum cash payments equal to the sum of (y) a discretionary, subjective basis.


78


Retirement Benefits.  Our employees, including our named executive officers, participate in a 401(k) plan under which they may defer portions of their base salaries. We contribute to participant accounts under this plan, and a participant’s vested interest in our contributions increases on an annual basis, with full vesting occurring after three years of service. The plan is available to employees on a non-discriminatory basis.
Other Compensation.  Our named executive officers also participate in our broad-based employee benefit plans, such as medical, dental, disability and life insurance programs.
Tax and Accounting Considerations
We take into account tax and accounting implications in our compensation programs. For example,multiple (reflected in the selectiontable below) of long-termthe relevant NEO’s then-current salary, and (z) a multiple (reflected in the table below) of the amount of incentive compensation earned by the relevant NEO during the year immediately preceding the Change of Control. Such payment shall be made by us within 60 days of the date of the termination of employment or resignation for Good Reason. In addition, any equity-based awards previously granted to the executive will become fully vested and exercisable and all restrictions on restricted awards will lapse, regardless of whether the NEO terminates employment.

The applicable multiples for each of the NEOs for a resignation for Good Reason or termination without cause, including in connection and not in connection with a Change of Control, are set forth in the table below. Using the base salary and assuming annual incentive compensation at target, if such resignation or termination of employment had occurred on December 31, 2014, the NEOs would have been entitled to the payments set out below:

Name

  Base
Salary
Multiple
   Salary
Payment

$
   Incentive
Compensation
Multiple
   Incentive
Compensation
Payment
$
  Value of
Accelerated
Vesting of
Equity
Incentive
Awards
$(2)
  Total
Payment

$
 

Trevor T. Hill

   N/A     —       —       —      48,130    48,130  

Ron L. Fleming

   1x     200,000     1x     70,000(1)   182,455    452,455  

Michael J. Liebman

   1x     200,000     1x     59,423(1)   116,389    375,812  

Cindy M. Bowers

   N/A     —       —       —      24,066(3)   24,066  

Brett B. Higginbotham(4)

   —       —       —       —      —      —    

(1)Represents the target cash incentive award for the year ended December 31, 2014 as set forth in “Annual Incentive Awards” above, multiplied by the multiple set forth in the table immediately above. Assumes that the NEO earned the target cash incentive award during the year immediately preceding the date of resignation or termination. In the event that the resignation or termination does not occur in connection with a Change of Control and occurs during the last six months of our fiscal year, the NEO will also be paid a pro rata cash incentive award based upon our performance for the fiscal year payable at such time as incentive compensation is otherwise payable to employees under the incentive compensation program.
(2)Represents the estimated value of unvested PSUs and SARs as at December 31, 2014, of which vesting would accelerate. The estimated payout value of the PSUs was calculated using the GWRC common share price on the Toronto Stock Exchange at the close of business on December 31, 2014, multiplied by the number of PSUs outstanding as of December 31, 2014. The estimated payout value of the SARs was calculated as the difference between the strike price of the SARs and the GWRC common share price on the Toronto Stock Exchange at the close of business on December 31, 2014, multiplied by the number of SARs outstanding as of December 31, 2014. The PSU and SAR payouts were converted into U.S. dollars at a rate of US $0.8617 per CAD $1.00 (the exchange rate at December 31, 2014). No value has been ascribed in this table for any stock options granted to management on January 9, 2012 as the stock options were fully vested.
(3)For the purpose of this table, no value has been ascribed to the stock options granted to Ms. Bowers in 2010 as the stock options were out-of-the-money. At December 31, 2014, the implied value of the Company’s common stock shares, which is based on GWRC’s common share price on the Toronto Stock Exchange, was less than the exercise price of the options, which, giving effect to the 100.68-for-1 forward stock split with respect to the Company’s common stock that will be effected prior to the completion of this offering in connection with the Reorganisation Transaction, is US$8.65 per common stock share of the Company. Prior to this offering, shares of the Company’s common stock were not actively traded.
(4)Effective October 3, 2014, Mr. Higginbotham is no longer an officer of the Company.

A “Change of Control” is defined in the executives’ employment agreements to generally mean either or both of the acquisition by a person or persons acting as a group, other than GWRC, of ownership of shares of the Company’s common stock that, together with stock held by such person or group, constitutes more than 50% of the total fair market value or total voting power of the stock of the Company; or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, other than a sale to GWRC. Neither the Reorganization Transaction nor this offering will constitute a “Change of Control” under the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan, we will review projected expense amounts and expense timing associated with alternative types of awards. Under current accounting rules (i.e., FAS 123(R)), we must expense the grant-date fair value of share-based grants such as restricted stock and stock options. The grant-date value is amortized and expensed over the service period or vesting period of the grant.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code places a limit on the tax deduction for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the chief executive officer and four most highly compensated executive officers of a corporation in a taxable year. While we do not currently anticipate exceeding this limit, we plan to retain the flexibility to pay non-deductible compensation if we believe that doing so is in the best interests of the company.
Director Compensation
Our directors did not receive compensation for their services in such capacity for 2007 or 2008. Mr. Hill receives compensation for his services as our President and Chief Executive Officer, however, and Messrs. Levine and Cracchiolo have received payments for services rendered to us in other capacities. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”
Executive Compensation
executives’ employment agreements.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensationconcerning outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2014 for each of our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and our other most highly compensated executive officers who earned more than $100,000 in total compensation with respect to 2007.

Summary Compensation Table
                     
           All Other
    
     Salary
  Bonus
  Compensation
    
Name and Principal Position
 Year  ($)  ($)  ($)(1)  Total ($) 
 
Trevor T. Hill  2007   300,000   150,000   2,276,408   2,726,408 
President and Chief Executive Officer                    
Cindy M. Liles  2007   166,289   45,000   149,322   360,611 
Senior Vice President of Growth Services and Treasurer                    
Leo Commandeur  2007   207,000   60,000   951,066   1,218,066 
Senior Vice President of Business Development and Secretary                    
Graham Symmonds  2007   166,289   45,000   244,643   455,932 
Senior Vice President Regulatory Affairs and Compliance and Chief Technology Officer                    
NEOs:

  Option Awards  Stock Awards 

Name

 Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
exercisable
  Number of
securities
underlying
unexercised
options (#)
unexercisable
  Option
exercise
price(1)
  Option
expiration
date
  Number of
unearned shares,
units or other
rights that have
not vested
  Market or payout
value of unearned
shares, units or
other rights that
have not vested
$(2)
 

Trevor T. Hill

  209,561(3)   —     CAD$7.50    1/8/2016    10,721    48,130  

Ron L. Fleming

  7,276(3)   —     CAD$4.00    1/8/2016    17,725    252,455  
  37,500(4)   62,500(4)  CAD$2.00    7/1/2023    

Michael J. Liebman

  —      —      —      —      15,013    175,812  
  31,250(5)   68,750(5)  CAD$3.38    11/14/2023    

Cindy M. Bowers

  52,390(3)   —     CAD$4.00    1/8/2016    5,361    24,066  
  43,393(6)   —     $8.65(6)   6/23/2018    

Brett B. Higginbotham

  —      —      —      —      —      —    

(1)All exercise prices expressed in Canadian dollars will be converted to U.S. dollars upon consummation of the Reorganization Transaction.
(2)The estimated payout value of the PSUs was calculated using the GWRC common share price on the Toronto Stock Exchange on the close of business on December 31, 2014, multiplied by the number of PSUs outstanding. The PSU values were converted into U.S. dollars at a rate of US$0.8617 per CAD$1.00. PSUs paid in March 2015 were included herein since they were awarded in February 2014 pursuant to our 2014 Incentive Program.
(3)Represents tax reimbursement payments by Global Water Resources, LLCoptions to holderspurchase GWRC common shares granted on January 9, 2012. Upon the consummation of limited liability company intereststhe Reorganization Transaction, the options to purchase GWRC common shares will be exchanged for options to purchase the Company’s common stock and the exercise price will be converted to U.S. dollars.
(4)Represents SARs granted on July 1, 2013. The Fleming SARs vest ratably over 16 quarters from the grant date and give Mr. Fleming the right to receive a cash payment equal to the difference between CAD$2.00 per share and the closing price of GWRC’s common shares on the exercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of CAD$2.00 per share. The award contains a provision that allows for an 18-month acceleration of vesting upon a change in control in accordance with the terms of its operating agreement,the SAR agreement. The award provides that vested SARs be settled in cash with no provision for a conversion to GWRC’s common shares.
(5)Represents SARs granted on November 14, 2013. The Liebman SARs vest ratably over 16 quarters from the grant date and give Mr. Liebman the right to receive a cash payment equal to the difference between CAD$3.38 per share and the closing price of GWRC’s common shares on the exercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of CAD$3.38 per share. The award contains a provision that allows for a 12-month acceleration of vesting upon a change in control in accordance with the terms of the SAR agreement. The award provides that vested SARs be settled in cash with no provision for a conversion to GWRC’s common shares.
(6)

Represents options granted to Ms. Bowers on December 30, 2010 to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock. The option exercise price indicated is the exercise price per share of the Company’s common stock is in U.S. Dollars. In June 2008, the Company granted 50 unit options to Ms. Bowers pursuant to which reflectMs. Bowers had the right to purchase common limited liability company units of GWR, a predecessor to the Company. These unit options had an exercise price of US$7,500 per unit option, a contractual life of 10 years, and a four-year vesting period with 25% vesting on each anniversary of the

grant date. In connection with GWRC’s initial public offering in large measureCanada, the 50 unit options were converted into options to acquire 431 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of US$870.66 per share. The amounts reflected in the table above have been adjusted to give effect to the 100.68-for-1 forward stock split with respect to the Company’s common stock that will be effected prior to the completion of this offering in connection with the Reorganization Transaction. The stock option award vested as follows: 50% on the December 30, 2010 grant date, an additional 25% on June 25, 2011, and the remaining 25% on June 25, 2012. The options will be forfeited if not exercised by June 23, 2018. The assumptions used in the fair value calculation of the replacement award were as follows: dividend yield—0%; expected volatility—34%; risk-free interest rate—1.57%; and expected life—4 years. The stock option award has a remaining contractual life of approximately 3.5 years.


79

Director Compensation


The following table provides information for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, regarding all plan and non-plan compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to, each person who served as a director for some portion or all of 2014:

Summary of Director Compensation Program

Historically, directors have been entitled to compensation for their services as members of the board of directors of the Company. The compensation arrangements for the directors of the Company are summarized below.

Component

the difference between taxable revenue

Amount $

Payment Method

Annual Retainer(1)

50,000 per year50% DPUs/50% cash

Committee Membership Retainer

12,000 per year50% DPUs/50% cash

Audit and revenue for financial reporting purposes,Risk Committee Chair

12,500 per year50% DPUs/50% cash

Other Board or Committee Chair

7,500 per year50% DPUs/50% cash

Meeting Attendance Fee (Board and company matching contributions to the individual’s 401(k) plan accountCommittee)

1,250 per meeting in the following amounts:person/
1,000 per meeting by telephone
50% DPUs/50% cash
         
  Tax Reimbursement
  401(k) Company Match
 
  $  $ 
 
Mr. Hill  2,268,658   7,750 
Ms. Liles  142,983   6,339 
Mr. Commandeur  943,316   7,750 
Mr. Symmonds  238,304   6,339 
Employment Agreements
On October 24, 2003, Global Water Resources, LLC entered into

(1)Includes $10,000 annual retainer for service on GWRC’s board of directors.

Directors receive one-half of their compensation in cash and one-half in the form of DPUs. However, if a director holds a minimum of three times the value of the annual retainer in GWRC’s common shares, such director may elect to receive all or a portion his or her compensation in cash. The directors of the Company are also reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred for attending board and committee meetings. The independent directors of the Company that were entitled to compensation in 2014 were L. Rita Theil, Richard M. Alexander and David C. Tedesco. Mr. Levine, who is neither an employment agreement with our Chief Executive Officer, Trevor T. Hill. Unless we negotiateindependent director nor an employee, receives an annual retainer and meeting attendance fees for his role as a new employment agreement withdirector. Mr. Hill Global Water Resources, LLC will assign this agreement, revisedbegan to receive an annual retainer and meeting attendance fees for his role as necessary to comply with the Internal Revenue Code, to us upon effectivenessChairman of the Reorganization. The agreement has an initial five-year term that will be extended automatically for a successive12-month period at the end of the initial term (and at the end of any12-month extension thereof) unless either party provides 60 days’ prior written notice to the other of its intent not to extend the agreement. The agreement provides for an initial base salary of $200,000 per year, which is subject to review by the board of directors for the Company in 2015. Ms. Bowers began to receive an annual retainer and meeting attendance fees for her role as director of the Company in 2015.

The Company has adopted a deferred phantom unit plan (the “DPU Plan”) authorizing the directors of the Company to grant DPUs to independent directors who are residents of Canada. DPUs are units whose value tracks the performance of GWRC’s common shares and give rise to a right to receive a cash payment, the value of which, on a particular date, will be the market value of the equivalent number of GWRC common shares at least annually, a discretionary annual bonusthat date. Holders of DPUs are credited with dividend equivalents when and if dividends are paid on the common shares using the market value of the GWRC common shares on the trading day immediately prior to the dividend record date. DPUs granted to directors are fully vested upon the grant date. In order to align their interests with the interest of shareholders, an independent director is only permitted to redeem his/her DPUs upon ceasing to be determined bya director of the Company. The board of directors and such standard insurance, retirement and other benefits as are available to executives generally.

The agreement provides that if we terminate Mr. Hill’s employment without cause or upon his disability, we will continue to pay his base salary for a period of six months following his termination (or in the case of disability, until his earlier receipt of payments under our long-term disability, if any). The agreement contains non-competition and non-solicitation provisions that apply during the term of the agreement, for six months following our termination of Mr. Hill’s employment without cause and for two years following the termination of Mr.��Hill’s employment for all other reasons except for death or disability. The agreement also contains non-disclosure provisionsCompany believes that survive for two years following the terminationthis feature of the agreement with respectplan will result

in directors taking a long-term view of stockholder value. Additionally, directors will not be in a position to confidential information and for periods permitted under applicable law with respect to trade secrets.

Employee Benefit Plans
2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan.  We maintain the Global Water Resources, Inc. 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“Incentive Plan”). Ourprofit from unit volatility. The board of directors has reserved           shares of the Company believes that the issuance of DPUs as a core component of the independent directors’ compensation strengthens the alignment of interests between the independent directors and the stockholder by linking their holdings and a portion of their annual retainer to the future value of the GWRC common stock, representing approximately 10% of our shares of common stockshares.

Following the Reorganization Transaction, we anticipate that the Company’s director compensation program will remain in effect as summarized above. A separate DPU Plan that is sponsored by GWRC will be outstanding upon completion ofassumed by the Company, and the Company intends for such plan to remain in effect. The Company also intends for the DPU Plan that is sponsored by the Company to remain in effect following the Reorganization for issuance pursuant to awards that may be made underTransaction. From and after the Incentive Plan, subject to adjustment as provided therein. Awards under the Incentive Plan are determined by a committee appointed by the board of directors (“Committee”). To the extent required by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code for a grant to qualify as qualified performance based compensation, the maximum number of shares of common stock with respect to which options, stock appreciation rights and other awards may be granted during any calendar year to any employees will not exceed           shares or, in the case of awards payable in cash, the maximum amount that may be paid in any calendar year to an employee pursuant to an award may not exceed $     .

Key employees, officers, directors and other service providers of our company or an affiliate are eligible for awards under the Incentive Plan. The Incentive Plan permits the Committee to make awards of shares of common stock, awards of derivative securities related toReorganization Transaction, the value of the DPUs will track the value of the Company’s common stock and awards payable in cash or shares of common stock based upon satisfaction of performance criteria or measuredstock.

Director Compensation Table

Total compensation earned by the dividend rights of holders of shares of common stock. The Incentive Plan permits the Committee to make awards of a variety of equity- or cash-based incentives, specifically: stock awards, options to purchase shares of common stock, stock appreciation rights, performance awards, restricted stock units, phantom stock and dividend equivalent rights (“Stock Incentives”). In addition, the Committee may authorize supplemental cash awards to defray the expense of income taxes imposed upon the recipient of an award by reasondirectors of the grant or


80


settlement of a Stock Incentive. These discretionary awards may be made on an individual basis, or pursuant to a program approved byCompany during the Committee for the benefit of a group of eligible persons.
The number of shares of common stock as to which an awardfiscal year ended December 31, 2014 is granted and to whom any Stock Incentive is granted, and all other terms and conditions of an award, is determined by the Committee, subject to the general provisions of the Incentive Plan. The Committee may modify the terms and conditions of an award under certain circumstances and provided such modification does not adversely affect the rights of the holder. The terms of particular awards may provide that they terminate, among other reasons, upon the holder’s termination of employment or other status with respect to the company and any affiliate, upon a specified date, upon the holder’s death or disability, or upon the occurrence of a change in control of the company. At the Committee’s discretion, awards that are held by an employee who suffers a termination of employment may be cancelled, accelerated, paid or continued, subject to the terms of the applicable award agreement and to the provisions of the Incentive Plan. Awards generally are not transferable or assignable during a holder’s lifetime and the company has no duty to recognize any disposition of awards not in accordance with the Incentive Plan.
The number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance in connection with the grant or settlement of awards or to which an award is subject, as the case may be, the exercise price of each option, the strike price of stock appreciation rights, and the per calendar year limit on the number of shares of common stock that may be granted to any single employee are subject to adjustmentset forth in the event of any recapitalization of the company or similar event, effected without the receipt of consideration. In the event of certain corporate reorganizations and similar events, awards may be substituted, cancelled, accelerated, cashed-out or otherwise adjusted by the Committee, provided such adjustment is not inconsistent with the express terms of the Incentive Plan or the applicable award.
Other Benefit Plans.  We also provide a 401(k) retirement plan for our employees, who are eligible to participate after three months of service. We contribute to participant accounts under this plan, and a participant’s vested interest in our contributions increases on an annual basis, with full vesting occurring after three years of service. We also provide group medical dental, disability and life insurance benefits to our employees.
Limitation of Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors
As permitted by Section 102 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws limit or eliminate the personal liability of our directors for a breach of their fiduciary duty of care as directors. The duty of care generally requires that when acting on behalf of the corporation, directors exercise an informed business judgment based on all material information reasonably available to them. Consequently, a director will not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages or breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability for:
table below.

Name

  Fees earned
or paid in
cash
$
   Stock
Awards
$(1)
  Total
$
 

Richard M. Alexander(2)

  $48,187    $34,438(3)  $82,625  

L. Rita Theil

  $38,812    $38,813(4)  $77,625  

David C. Tedesco(2)

  $12,500    $65,125(5)  $77,625  

William S. Levine

  $40,750     —     $40,750  

(1)
• any breachRepresents DPUs awarded in 2014. Prior to the Reorganization Transaction, each DPU granted tracks the performance of GWRC’s common shares and gives rise to a right of the director’s dutyholder to receive a cash payment the value of loyalty to us or our stockholders;
• any act or omission not in good faith orwhich, on a particular date will be the market value of the equivalent number of common shares at that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violationdate. The value of law;
• any actthe DPUs presented above was calculated as the common share price on the Toronto Stock Exchange on the date the related to unlawful stock repurchases, redemptions or other distributions or payment of dividends; or
• any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
These limitations of liability do not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission. Our certificate of incorporation will authorize us to indemnify our officers, directors and other agents to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law.


81


As permitted by Section 14 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that:
• we may indemnify our directors, officers and employees to the fullest extent permittedDPUs were awarded, multiplied by the Delaware General Corporation Law, subjectnumber of DPUs awarded, with such amount being converted into U.S. dollars on the respective award date. DPUs are fully vested upon issuance. Following the Reorganization Transaction, the value of the DPUs will track the value of the Company’s common stock.
(2)Based on having met minimum ownership threshold of GWRC common shares, Mr. Alexander elected to limited exceptions;receive greater than 50% of his directors’ fees in cash, and Mr. Tedesco elected to receive more than 50% of his directors’ fees in DPUs.
(3)• we may advance expenses to our directors, officers and employees in connectionAt December 31, 2014, Mr. Alexander held 7,189 DPUs with a legal proceeding toan estimated payout value of $32,275 (calculated as the fullest extent permittedGWRC common share price on the Toronto Stock Exchange on the close of business on December 31, 2014, multiplied by the Delaware General Corporation Law, subject to limited exceptions; and
• the rights provided in our bylaws are not exclusive.number of DPUs outstanding, with such amount being converted into U.S. dollars at a rate of $0.8617 per CAD$1.00).
At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors, officers, employees or agents in which any of them is seeking indemnification from us, nor are we aware of any threatened litigation or proceeding that may result in a claim for indemnification.
We will seek to obtain a policy of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance that insures our directors and officers against the cost of defense, settlement or payment of a judgment in some circumstances that will be effective upon completion of this offering.


82

(4)At December 31, 2014, Ms. Theil held 32,686 DPUs with an estimated payout value of $146,743 (calculated in the manner described above in footnote 3).
(5)At December 31, 2014, Mr. Tedesco held 17,799 DPUs with an estimated payout value of $79,907 (calculated in the manner described above in footnote 3).


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We describe below transactions and series

The following are summaries of similar transactions since January 1, 2006,2014 to which we werehave been a partyparticipant, in which the amount involved in the transaction exceeds or will be a party,exceed $120,000 and in which:

• the amounts involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000; and
• a director, executive officer, holderwhich any of more than 5% of our common stock or any member of their immediate family had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
We also describe below certain other transactions with our directors, executive officers and stockholders. We believe that the terms obtained or consideration paid or received, as applicable, in connection with the transactions described below were comparable to terms available or the amounts that would be paid or received, as applicable, in arm’s-length transactions. It is our intention to ensure that all future transactions between us and our directors, officers, holders of more than 5% of our voting securities, or any immediate family member of, or person sharing the household with, any of these individuals, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Reorganization Transaction

Concurrently with the consummation of this offering, GWRC, which currently owns approximately 47.8% of our outstanding common stock, will merge with and into us. We will be the surviving corporation after the merger, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including GWRC’s shareholder approval. At the effective time of the merger, holders of GWRC’s common shares will receive one share of our common stock for each outstanding common share of GWRC. The Reorganization Transaction and the consummation of this offering will be contingent upon each other and will occur simultaneously. See “The Transactions—Reorganization Transaction” for additional information.

Sale of Global Water Management, LLC

On June 5, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) and sold its wholly-owned subsidiary, GWM, to an investor group led by a private equity firm which specializes in the water industry. GWM owns and operates the FATHOM™ business. The transaction was effected through the sale of all of the outstanding membership interests of GWM to a wholly-owned subsidiary of the FATHOM Partnership. The Company received the following consideration for the sale of GWM: (a) a cash payment of $4.25 million (which was subject to a post-closing working capital adjustment of $1.7 million paid by us); and (b) the issuance to the Company of common and preferred units of the FATHOM Partnership valued at approximately $0.8 million. In addition, we are entitled to quarterly royalty payments based on a percentage of certain of GWM’s recurring revenues for a 10-year period, up to a maximum of $15.0 million. In 2014, we received an aggregate of $272,000 of such royalty payments, and we estimate that we received approximately $326,000 of such royalty payments in 2015.

GWM has historically provided billing, customer service and other support services for our regulated utilities business whereby FATHOM™ service fees charged to our regulated utilities were eliminated upon consolidation. In conjunction with the Securities Purchase Agreement, we entered into a services agreement with GWM whereby we agreed to use the FATHOM™ platform for all of our regulated utility services for an initial term of 10 years. The services agreement is automatically renewable thereafter for successive 10-year periods, unless notice of termination is given prior to any renewal period. The services agreement may be terminated by either party for default only and the termination of the services agreement will also result in the termination of the royalty payments payable to us. In 2014, we paid $2.4 million to GWM for FATHOM™ service fees, and we estimate that we paid approximately $2.2 million to GWM for FATHOM™ service fees in 2015.

Concurrent with the closing, we invested $750,000 of the cash portion of the purchase price in a convertible promissory note issued by GWM’s parent. The promissory note was due December 31, 2014, bore interest at a rate of 10% per annum and was convertible into equity of the FATHOM Partnership. We converted the convertible promissory note into equity of the FATHOM Partnership, as part of FATHOM Partnership’s refinancing transaction in November 2014.

We continue to hold an indirect interest in GWM through our ownership of the common and preferred units of the FATHOM Partnership received in consideration for the sale of GWM. Together, these units currently represent an approximate 8.0% ownership interest in the FATHOM Partnership (on a fully diluted basis). Trevor Hill, who is the Chairman of our board of directors, currently has an executive director role with GWM and owns an approximate 12% interest.

Management Agreement

In connection with GWRC’s initial public offering in Canada, on December 30, 2010, we entered into a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with GWRC. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, we agreed to provide substantially all necessary administrative and management services to GWRC and to pay for all fees and other expenses related to the administration of GWRC and its public company reporting in Canada and other compliance requirements. In 2014, we paid an aggregate of $505,000 of such fees and expenses, and we estimate that we paid approximately $759,000 of such fees and expenses in 2015. We are not entitled to any fee for our services from GWRC under the Management Agreement. The Management Agreement will be terminated on consummation of this offering.

Medical Benefits Plan

We provide medical benefits to our employees through our participation in Camelback Services Health Plan (the “Plan”), which is a self-defined, self-insured plan for medical claims sponsored by Camelback Services, Inc. (during 2014 and 2015) and Camelback Systems, Inc. (effective January 1, 2016) (collectively, “Camelback Services”). The Plan provides health claim administration services for our employees and employees of Camelback Services. A third party administrator unrelated to the Company and Camelback Services administers claims on behalf of the Plan and we reimburse the Plan for medical claims incurred with respect to our employees. Mr. Levine, a member of our board of directors and a major stockholder, is the President and sole owner of Camelback Services. No fees for property or services are paid by the Company to the Plan or Camelback Services, although the third party claims administrator charges the Plan a monthly claims administration fee.

Indemnification Agreements

Prior to the closing of the Reorganization Transaction, we plan to enter into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers. The indemnification agreements and our amended and restated bylaws that will be in effect upon consummation of this offering will require us to indemnify our directors to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. See “Description of Capital Stock—Limitations on Liability and Indemnification of Officers and Directors” for additional information.

Our Policy Regarding Related Party Transactions

Our board of directors recognizes that related party transactions present a heightened risk of conflicts of interest and/or improper valuation (or the perception thereof) and therefore intends to adopt a written policy that is to be followed in connection with approving and ratifying all related party transactions involving our company. The policy will cover transactions or series of transactions between directors, director nominees, executive officers, stockholders who own more than 5% of our common stock and any members of their immediate families and their affiliates are approvedfamilies. It will also apply to any business entity in which any of the persons listed above has a direct or indirect material interest.

Permission for a related party transaction may only be granted in writing in advance by a majorityeither the audit committee of our board of directors including a majorityin the case of transactions involving officers and directors or, in any case, by the board of directors acting exclusively through its disinterested members.

Transactions involving the compensation of executive officers will be reviewed and, if appropriate, approved by the compensation committee of the disinterestedboard of directors and arein the manner specified in the charter of the compensation committee.

Before any related person transaction is permitted, the following factors must be considered:

the nature of the related party’s interest in the transaction;

the dollar value of the amount involved in the transaction;

the dollar value of the related party’s interest in the transaction without regard to the amount of any profit or loss;

whether the transaction occurs in the ordinary course of business of our company;

whether the transaction with the related person is proposed to be entered into on terms no lessmore favorable to usour company than thoseterms that we may obtain from unaffiliated third parties. Thecould have been reached with an unrelated party; and

any other information set forth in this section assumes conversion of all outstanding shares of preferred stock into shares of common stock.
We are a party to a financial consulting agreement with Williams Manufacturing Company, with respect to which our Chairman, William S. Levine, isregarding the majority owner and president and under which we pay fees to such affiliate based on a percentagetransaction of the outstanding borrowingsrelated party that may be material in light of the circumstances of the particular transaction.

Approval of a related party transaction will only be granted if it is determined that, under our revolving credit facility. Fees are calculated under two alternative scenarios. If we elect to pay interest based onall of the prime rate,circumstances, the feetransaction is equal to the additional amount of interest we would pay if such payments were based on the prime rate as opposed to our current rate of 1.25% below prime. If we elect to pay interest based on LIBOR, the fee is equal to the additional amount of interest we would pay if such payments were based on LIBOR plus 2.25% as opposed to LIBOR plus 1.25%. Mr. Levine and Levine Investments, L.P., a limited partnership of which Mr. Levine is a general partner, guarantee all indebtedness under the credit facility, which had a balance of $34.6 million and a $3.3 million letter of credit outstanding at December 31, 2007. We paid $604,140 in fees to Williams Manufacturing Company under the financial consulting agreement during 2007 and anticipate that we will continue to pay fees under the agreement in the foreseeable future.

We plan to redeem the outstanding preferred limited liability companybest interests of Global Water Resources, LLCour company and Global Water Management, LLC prioronly so long as those interests outweigh any negative effect that may arise from permitting it to the effectiveness of this offering. The redemption will be financed through additional borrowings under the revolving credit facility described above, which facility will be repaid in full with the net proceeds of this offering. The following investors will receive the following amounts in connection with such redemption:
Investor
Amount of Unrecovered CapitalAccrued 8% Return
Levine Investments, L.P. $
Trevor T. Hill
Leo Commandeur
Daniel Cracchiolo
We received legal services from the firm of Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A., in which one of our directors, Daniel Cracchiolo, is a partner. During 2007, we paid Burch & Cracchiolo $283,462 in legal fees, representing less than 5% of that firm’s 2007 gross revenue.


83occur.


PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth certain information with respect toabout the beneficial ownership of our common stock at          , 2008,immediately prior to and as adjustedafter the consummation of this offering and the Reorganization Transaction described herein, for:

each stockholder known by us to reflectbe the salebeneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock offeredstock;

each of our directors;

each of our named executive officers;

all of our directors and executive officers as a group;

The number of shares beneficially owned by us in this offering, for:

• each person, or group of affiliated persons, who we know beneficially owns more than 5% of our outstanding common stock;
• each of our directors;
• each of our director nominees;
• each of our named executive officers; and
• all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
Unless otherwise noted below, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the tablestockholder isc/o Global Water Resources, Inc., 91410 N. 19th Avenue, Suite 201, Phoenix, Arizona 85027.
We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with theunder rules of the SEC. Except as indicatedissued by the footnotes below, we believe, based upon the information furnished to us, that the personsSEC and entities named in the table below haveincludes voting andor investment power with respect to allsecurities. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares of common stock that they beneficially own, subjectas to applicable community property laws.
Applicable percentage ownership is based on           shares of common stock outstanding as of          , 2008 and           shares of common stock upon completion of this offering.which the individual or entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power. In computing the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by a personan individual or entity and the percentage ownership of that person, we deemed any outstanding shares of common stock subject to options, or other rights, including the redemption right described above, held by thatsuch person that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable as of          , which iswithin 60 days afterof the date of this table. We did not deemprospectus, are considered outstanding, although these shares are not considered outstanding however, for the purposepurposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. All information is presentedEach of the stockholders listed has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by the stockholder unless noted otherwise, subject to community property laws where applicable.

The number of shares and the percentages under “Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Reorganization Transaction” below reflect holdings as of January 19, 2016 (prior to the Reorganization Transaction) and are based on a pro forma basis181,179 shares of our common stock outstanding as of such date. The number of shares and percentages under “Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Offering (but After the Reorganization Transaction)” below are based on 18,241,746 shares of common stock to be issued and outstanding after giving effect to the Reorganization.

Reorganization Transaction (including the 100.68-for-1 forward stock split with respect to our common stock effected prior to the completion of this offering). The number of shares and the percentages under “Shares Beneficially Owned After the Offering” below are based on             shares of common stock to be issued and outstanding after giving further effect to the shares of our common stock sold by us in this offering. The table assumes no exercise by the underwriter of its option to purchase additional shares of our common stock.

Unless otherwise indicated, the address of all listed stockholders is c/o Global Water Resources, Inc., 21410 N 19th Avenue #220, Phoenix, AZ 85027.

   Shares Beneficially
Owned Prior to the
Reorganization
Transaction
  Shares Beneficially
Owned Prior to the
Offering (but After
the Reorganization
Transaction)(1)
  Shares Beneficially
Owned After the
Offering
 

Name

  Number
of Shares
  Percentage
of Class
  Number
of Shares
   Percentage
of Class
  Number
of Shares
   Percentage
of Class
 

5% Stockholders:

         

GWR Global Water Resources Corp.(2)

   86,675    47.8  —       —      —       —    

Andrew Cohn(3)

   10,768    5.9  1,192,828     6.5        

Leo P. Commandeur(4)

   10,032    5.5  1,024,641     5.6        

Polar Asset Management Partners Inc.(5)

   —      —      959,900     5.3        

Directors and Named Executive Officers:

         

Trevor T. Hill(6)

   25,080(13)   13.8  2,616,811     14.3        

Richard M. Alexander(7)

   —  (13)   —      32,500     *          

Cindy M. Bowers(8)

   1,723(13)   *    237,002     1.3        

William S. Levine(9)

   44,488(13)   24.6  6,079,210     33.3        

David C. Tedesco

   —  (13)   —      —       —      —       —    

L. Rita Theil(10)

   —  (13)   —      2,666     *          

Ron L. Fleming(11)

   —      —      9,796     *          

Michael J. Liebman(12)

   —      —      7,200     *          

Total for all directors and named executive officers as a group (8 persons)

   71,291    39.3  8,985,185     49.3        

*Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%.
(1)As described above, the share amounts and percentages reflected in this column give effect to (i) the 100.68-for-1 forward stock split with respect to our common stock that will be effected prior to the completion of this offering and (ii) the Reorganization Transaction (pursuant to which certain beneficial owners that previously held shares of GWRC will receive shares of the Company). See “The Transactions—Reorganization Transaction” for additional information.
(2)As of the date hereof, prior to giving effect to the Reorganization Transaction, GWRC owns approximately 47.8% of our outstanding common stock. As a result of the Reorganization Transaction, GWRC will be merged with and into the Company, and holders of GWRC’s common shares will receive one share of the Company’s common stock for each outstanding common share of GWRC. See “The Transactions—Reorganization Transaction” for additional information.
(3)Amount reflected under “Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Offering (but After the Reorganization Transaction)” includes 108,667 shares of our common stock to be received by Mr. Cohn in exchange for his shares of GWRC pursuant to the Reorganization Transaction.
(4)
PercentAs of
Amount the date hereof, amount reflected under “Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Reorganization Transaction” consists of (i) 5,016 shares held of record by the DDC 2012 Trust dated December 12, 2012, for which Mr. Commandeur’s spouse serves as trustee and
Percent (ii) 5,016 shares held of
Shares
Nature of
Common
Beneficially
Beneficial
Stock
Owned After
Name, Position record by the LPC 2012 Trust dated December 12, 2012, for which Leo P. Commandeur and Address
OwnershipOutstandingOffering
Directors
William S. Levine(1)42.437%
Trevor T. Hill23.292%
Daniel Cracchiolo(2)6.125%
Non-Director Executive Officers
Leo serve as trustees. Amount reflected under “Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Offering (but After the Reorganization Transaction)” includes 14,584 shares of our common stock to be received by Mr. Commandeur11.646%
Graham Symmonds2.500%
Cindy M. Liles1.500%
Other More than 5% Shareholders
Andrew Cohn(3)12.500%
All directors and executive
officers as a group (6 in total)
87.500%exchange for his shares of GWRC pursuant to the Reorganization Transaction.
(5)Amount reflected under “Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Offering (but After the Reorganization Transaction)” includes 959,900 shares of our common stock to be received by Polar Asset Management Partners Inc. in exchange for its shares of GWRC pursuant to the Reorganization Transaction based on the stockholder’s Alternative Monthly Early Warning Report, dated November 10, 2015, filed with the Canadian Securities Administrators. The stockholder’s address is 401 Bay Street, Suite 1900, Toronto, Ontario M5H 2Y4.

(6)As of the date hereof, amount reflected under “Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Reorganization Transaction” consists of (i) 20,064 shares held of record by Mr. Hill and (ii) 5,016 shares held of record by the LPC 2012 Trust dated December 12, 2012, for which Leo P. Commandeur and Trevor T. Hill serve as trustees. Amount reflected under “Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Offering (but After the Reorganization Transaction)” includes 91,667 shares of our common stock to be received by Mr. Hill in exchange for his shares of GWRC pursuant to the Reorganization Transaction.
(1)(7)Amount reflected under “Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Offering (but After the Reorganization Transaction)” includes 32,500 shares of our common stock to be received by Mr. Alexander in exchange for his shares of GWRC pursuant to the Reorganization Transaction.
(8)The indicatedAmount reflected under “Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Offering (but After the Reorganization Transaction)” includes 63,524 shares areof our common stock to be received by Ms. Bowers in exchange for her shares of GWRC pursuant to the Reorganization Transaction.
(9)As of the date hereof, amount reflected under “Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Reorganization Transaction” consists of 44,488 shares held of record by Levine Investments L.P., ofLimited Partnership, for which Mr. Levine is aserves as general partner. The addressAmount reflected under “Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Offering (but After the Reorganization Transaction)” includes 1,600,000 shares of our common stock to be received by Mr. Levine andin exchange for his shares of Levine Investments, L.P., is 1702 E. Highland Ave, Suite 310, Phoenix, AZ 85016.
(2)The address of Mr. Cracchiolo is 702 East Osborne, Suite 200, Phoenix, AZ 85014.
(3)The address of Mr. Cohn is 1702 E. Highland Ave, Suite 310, Phoenix, AZ 85016.GWRC pursuant to the Reorganization Transaction.


84

(10)Amount reflected under “Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Offering (but After the Reorganization Transaction)” includes 2,666 shares of our common stock to be received by Ms. Theil in exchange for her shares of GWRC pursuant to the Reorganization Transaction.
(11)Amount reflected under “Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Offering (but After the Reorganization Transaction)” includes 9,796 shares of our common stock to be received by Mr. Fleming in exchange for his shares of GWRC pursuant to the Reorganization Transaction.
(12)Amount reflected under “Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to the Offering (but After the Reorganization Transaction)” includes 7,200 shares of our common stock to be received by Mr. Liebman in exchange for his shares of GWRC pursuant to the Reorganization Transaction.
(13)Amount does not include shares owned directly by GWRC, for which such individual serves as a director for.


DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

Upon completionconsummation of this offering, after giving effect to the Reorganization, our authorized capital stock will consist of 100,000,00060,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value $0.01 per share, and 1,000,0005,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock. The followingstock, par value $0.01 per share. A description summarizes some of the material terms and provisions of our capital stock. Because it is only a summary, it does not contain all the information that may be important to you. For a complete description, you should refer to ouramended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws copiesthat will be in effect upon consummation of this offering is set forth below. The description is intended as a summary and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the form of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and the form of our amended and restated bylaws to be adopted and which have beenwill be filed as exhibits towith the registration statement of which the prospectus is a part.

relating to this prospectus.

Common Stock

As of          , 2008, there were           shares of common stock outstanding, held of record by seven stockholders. After this offering, there will be           shares of our common stock outstanding, or           shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full.
The holders

Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders, including the election of directors, and do not have cumulative voting rights. Accordingly, the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock would normally be entitled to vote in any election of directors can elect all of the directors standing for election if they so choose, subject to the rights of any preferred stockholders. Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any then-outstanding preferred stock, holderschoose.

Holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably those dividends, if any, as may be declared by our board of directors out of legally available funds. Upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of common stock willwould normally be entitled to share ratably in the net assets legally available for distribution to stockholders after the payment of all of our debts and other liabilities of our company, subject to the prior rights of any preferred stock then outstanding. company.

Holders of common stock have no preemptive or conversion rights or other subscription rights and there are no redemption or sinking funds provisions applicable to the common stock. All outstanding shares

Preferred Stock

Our board of commondirectors has the authority, without action by our stockholders, to issue preferred stock are, and the common stock to be outstanding upon completion of this offering will be, fully paid and nonassessable.

Preferred Stock
There are presently no sharesfix voting powers for each class or series of preferred stock, outstanding. Followingand to provide that any class or series may be subject to redemption, entitled to receive dividends, entitled to rights upon dissolution, or convertible or exchangeable for shares of any other class or classes of capital stock. The rights with respect to a series or class of preferred stock may be greater than the offering,rights attached to our common stock. It is not possible to state the actual effect of the issuance of any shares of our preferred stock on the rights of holders of our common stock until our board of directors will havedetermines the authority, without any action byspecific rights attached to that preferred stock. The effect of issuing preferred stock could include, among other things, one or more of the stockholders, to issue from time to time up to 1,000,000 sharesfollowing:

restricting dividends in respect of our common stock;

diluting the voting power of our common stock or providing that holders of preferred stock in one or more series andhave the right to fixvote on matters as a class;

impairing the number of shares, designations, preferences, powers, and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and the qualifications or restrictions thereof. The preferences, powers, rights and restrictions of different series of preferred stock may differ with respect to dividend rates, amounts payable on liquidation voting rights, conversion rights, redemption provisions, sinking fund provisions, and purchase funds and other matters. The issuance of preferred stock could decrease the amount of earnings and assets available for distribution to holders of common stock or adversely affect the rights and powers, including voting rights of the holders ofour common stock, and may have the effect of stock; or

delaying deferring or preventing a change inof control of our company. The existence of authorized but unissued preferred stock may enable our board of directors to render more difficult or to discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise.us.
For example, if in the due exercise of its fiduciary obligations, our board of directors were to determine that a takeover proposal is not in our best interests, our board of directors could cause shares of preferred stock to be issued without stockholder approval in one or more private offerings or other transactions that might dilute the voting or other rights of the proposed acquirer or insurgent stockholder or stockholder group.

Anti-Takeover Effects of Provisions of Delaware Law

Some provisions of Delaware law contain provisions that could make the following transactions more difficult, including acquisition of us by means of a tender offer, acquisition of us by means of a proxy contest or otherwise or removal of our incumbent officers and directors.


85


These provisions, summarized below, are expected to discourage coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids. These provisions also are designed to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to first negotiate with our board of directors. We believe that the benefits of increased protection of our potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure us outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging these proposals because negotiation of these proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.
Delaware Anti-Takeover Statute
We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law which prohibits persons deemed “interested stockholders” from engaging in a “business combination” with a Delaware corporation for three years following the date thesesuch persons become interested stockholders. stockholders, unless:

the transaction is approved by the board of directors prior to the time that the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder;

upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the stockholder’s becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding stock owned by directors who are also officers of the corporation; or

subsequent to such time that the stockholder became an interested stockholder, the business combination is approved by the board of directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders by at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder.

Generally, a “business combination” includes a merger, asset or stock sale, or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder, and an “interested stockholder” is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns, or within three years prior to the determination of interested stockholder status did own, 15% or more of a corporation’s voting stock. Generally, a “business combination” includes a merger, asset or stock sale, or other transaction resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. The existence of this provision may have an anti-takeover effect with respect to transactions not approved in advance byand may delay, deter or prevent a change of control of our board of directors.

Limitations of LiabilityCompany.

In addition, our amended and Indemnification Matters

As permitted by Section 102 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, we intend to adopt provisions in ourrestated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws that limitwill be in effect upon consummation of this offering are expected to contain provisions that may make the liabilityacquisition of our company more difficult, including, but not limited to, the following:

only allowing our board of directors, Chairman of our board of directors, Chief Executive Officer or President to call special meetings of our stockholders;

setting forth specific procedures regarding how our stockholders may present proposals or nominate directors for monetary damageselection at stockholder meetings;

requiring advance notice and duration of ownership requirements for breachstockholder proposals;

permitting our board of their fiduciary duties, except for liability that cannot be eliminated underdirectors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval; and

limiting the Delaware General Corporation Law. Delaware law provides that directorsrights of a corporation will not be personally liable for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for anystockholders to amend our bylaws.

Shareholders Agreement

On December 30, 2010, the Company, GWRC and certain of the following:

• any breach of their duty of loyalty to the corporation or the stockholder;
• acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
• unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions as provided in Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law; or
• any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
This limitationCompany’s stockholders entered into a shareholders’ agreement, which provides GWRC with, among other things, certain rights with respect to our operations and business, including director nomination rights; approval rights of liability does not applycertain fundamental matters; drag-along rights, tag-along rights and rights of first refusal related to liabilities arising under the federal securities lawsour common stock; and does not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission.
As permitted by Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws also willfirst preferential rights to provide that we shall indemnify our directors and executive officers and may indemnify our other officers and employees and other agentsfunding to the fullest extent permitted by lawCompany under certain circumstances. Upon consummation of this offering and that we may advance expenses to our directors, officers and employees in connection with a legal proceeding to the fullest extent permitted byReorganization Transaction, the Delaware General Corporation Law, subject to limited exceptions. We believe that indemnification under our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws covers at least negligence and gross negligence on the part of indemnified parties. Our certificate of incorporation also permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out of his or her actions in this capacity, regardless of whether our certificate of incorporation or Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law would permit indemnification.
shareholders’ agreement will be terminated.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

We have appointedexpect to appoint Equity Financial Trust Company as the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock.

Nasdaq

NASDAQ Global Select Market Listing

We have appliedintend to havelist our common stock listed/approved for quotation on the NasdaqNASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol GWRI.


86“GWRS.”


SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Immediately prior

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our common stock. Futurestock, and we cannot predict the effect, if any, that sales of substantial amountsshares or availability of any shares for sale will have on the market price of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could affect prevailing market prices adversely. Furthermore, since only a limited number of shares will be available for sale shortly after the offering because of contractual and legal restrictions on resale described below, salesfrom time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of common stock in(including shares issued on the public market afterexercise of options, warrants or convertible securities, if any) or the restrictions lapseperception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock and our ability to raise equityadditional capital through a future sale of securities. See “Risk Factors—We do not know whether a market will develop for our common stock or what the market price of our common stock will be and, as a result, it may be difficult for you to sell your shares of our common stock” and “Risk Factors—Substantial future sales of our common stock, or the perception in the future.

public markets that these sales may occur, may depress our stock price.”

Upon completion of this offering and the Reorganization Transaction, we will have outstanding an aggregate of             shares of our common stock, outstanding, assuming no exercise of currently outstanding options.the underwriter’s option to purchase additional shares. Of these shares, all of the shares sold in this offering plus any additional shares sold upon exercise ofor issued in the underwriters’ over-allotment option,Reorganization Transaction will be freely transferabletradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, unless theythe shares are heldacquired by our “affiliates” as that term is useddefined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. The remaining           shares of common stock held by existing stockholders are restricted shares. Restricted shares may be sold in the public market only if registered or if they qualify for an exemption from registration under Rules 144 or 701 promulgated under the Securities Act, which rules are summarized below.

As a result oflock-up agreements and the provisions of Rules 144 and 701, additional shares will be available for sale in the public market, assuming no exercise of options or warrants, as follows:
•            restricted shares will be eligible for sale upon expiration of applicablelock-up agreements; and
•            restricted shares will be eligible for sale upon the expiration of their six month holding period and applicablelock-up agreements, from time to time and subject to volume limitations and other restrictions under Rule 144 (           of which are held by executive officers, directors and their affiliates).
Act.

Rule 144

In general, under Rule 144 as in effect on the date of this prospectus, once we have been subject to public company reporting requirements for at least 90 days, a person who is not deemed to have been one of our affiliates for purposes of the Securities Act at any time during the 90 days preceding a sale and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least six months, including the holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates, is entitled to sell those shares without complying with the manner of sale, volume limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144, subject to compliance with the public information requirements of Rule 144. If such a person has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least one year, including the holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates, then that person is entitled to sell those shares without complying with any of the requirements of Rule 144.

Under Rule 144, our affiliates or persons selling shares on behalf of our affiliates are entitled to sell upon the expiration of the lock-up agreements described below, within any three-month period beginning 90 days after the effective date of this offering, our affiliates, or a person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) who has beneficially owned restricted shares (as defined under Rule 144) for at least six months, is entitled to sell within any three-month periodprospectus, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of one percentof:

1% of the number of shares of our common stock then outstanding, which will equal approximately shares of our common stock immediately after completion of this offering; or

the average weekly trading volume of theour common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market during the four calendar weeks immediately preceding the datefiling of a notice on which notice of the sale is filedForm 144 with the SEC. respect to such sale.

Sales under Rule 144 by our affiliates or persons selling shares on behalf of our affiliates are also subject to requirements relating to thecertain manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about us.

2008 Long-Term

Lock-Up Agreements

We, our officers and directors and certain of our stockholders, who hold an aggregate of             shares of our common stock, expect to enter into an agreement that, without the prior written consent of the underwriter, we and they will not, subject to limited exceptions, directly or indirectly sell or dispose of any shares of common stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for shares of our common stock for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus. The lock-up restrictions and specified exceptions are described in more detail under “Underwriting.”

Rule 701

In general, under Rule 701 as in effect on the date of this prospectus, any of our employees, consultants or advisors who purchase shares of our common stock from us in connection with a compensatory stock or option plan or other written agreement in a transaction before the effective date of our initial public offering that was completed in reliance on Rule 701 and complied with the requirements of Rule 701 will, subject to the lock-up restrictions described above, be eligible to resell such shares 90 days after the date of this prospectus in reliance on Rule 144, but without compliance with certain restrictions, including the holding period, contained in Rule 144.

Equity Incentive Plan

We

Following this offering, we intend to file with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-8 under the Securities Act covering the shares of our common stock that we may issue underare subject to options and other awards issuable pursuant to our 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The registration statement is expected to be filed and become effective as soon as practicable after the completion of this offering. Accordingly, shares registered under theequity incentive plan. Shares covered by such registration statement will be available for sale in the open market following its effective date, subject to certain Rule 144 volume limitations applicable to affiliates and the180-daylock-up arrangement described terms of lock-up agreements applicable to those shares.

MATERIAL UNITED STATES FEDERAL TAX CONSIDERATIONS

The following discussion sets forth the material U.S. federal income tax considerations for Non-U.S. Holders (defined below) relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock issued pursuant to this offering, but does not purport to be a complete analysis of all potential tax matters for consideration. This discussion applies only to holders that hold our common stock as capital assets for U.S. federal income tax purposes (generally, property held for investment). This discussion does not address all aspects of taxation that may be relevant to holders in light of their particular investment or tax circumstances or to holders that are subject to special tax rules, including without limitation:

banks, insurance companies or other financial institutions;

entities that are tax-exempt for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

broker, dealers, traders, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, or persons that use the mark-to-market method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes;

persons holding shares of our common stock as part of a hedge, straddle, conversion or other “synthetic security” or integrated transaction;

former U.S. citizens or former long-term residents of the U.S.;

persons subject to the alternative minimum tax;

persons subject to the Medicare tax on investment income;

partnerships or other pass-through entities and holders of interests therein;

“controlled foreign corporations,” “passive foreign investment companies,” or corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid, or which has the result of avoiding, U.S. federal income tax; and

persons who acquire shares of our common stock pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation or through a tax-qualified retirement plan (or in exchange for shares of stock which were received pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation or through a tax-qualified retirement plan).

This discussion is based on current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “IRC”), the U.S. Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Treasury Regulations”), judicial decisions, published positions of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other applicable authorities, all as in effect on the date hereof and all of which are subject to differing interpretations or change, possibly with retroactive effect in a manner that could adversely affect a holder of our common stock. This discussion does not address all U.S. federal tax laws (such as estate or gift tax laws), nor does it address any aspects of U.S. state or local or non-U.S. taxation. We have not sought and will not seek any rulings from the IRS, or an opinion from legal counsel, regarding the matters discussed below. There can be no assurance the IRS or a court will not take a contrary position to that discussed below regarding the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our common stock.

As used in this summary, the term “Non-U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of our common stock that is neither a “U.S. person” nor an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A U.S. person is any person that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is or is treated as any of the following:

an individual who is a citizen or resident of the U.S.;

a corporation (including any entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized under the laws of the U.S., any state thereof or the District of Columbia;

an estate the income of which is taxable in the U.S. regardless of its source; or

a trust, the administration of which is subject to the primary supervision of a U.S. court and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or that has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

With respect to the first bullet point above, an individual is generally treated as a resident of the U.S. in any calendar year for U.S. federal income tax purposes if applicable.the individual either (i) is the holder of a green card, generally during any point of such year, or (ii) is present in the U.S. for at least 31 days in that calendar year, and for an aggregate of at least 183 days during the three-year period ending on the last day of the current calendar year. For purposes of the 183-day calculation (often referred to as the Substantial Presence Test), all of the days present in the U.S. during the current year, one-third of the days present in the U.S. during the immediately preceding year, and one-sixth of the days present in the second preceding year are counted. Residents of the U.S. are generally treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as if they were U.S. citizens.

If a partnership (including for this purpose any other entity that is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds common stock, the tax treatment of a partner of such partnership with respect to the partnership’s ownership of such shares generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partnerships and a partner in a partnership holding our common stock should consult its own tax advisers regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences to them.

Distributions

Subject to the discussion below under “—Information Reporting and Backup Withholding” and “—FATCA,” in general, distributions with respect to shares of our common stock will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. Dividends will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax at a 30% rate, unless such rate is reduced by an applicable income tax treaty. To the extent that the amount of a distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of the Non-U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in its shares of our common stock, which will reduce such basis dollar-for-dollar. Any excess distribution thereafter will be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of shares of our common stock, the tax treatment of which is discussed below under “—Gain on Disposition.” To receive the benefit of a reduced treaty rate, a Non-U.S. Holder must provide the applicable withholding agent with an IRS Form W-8BEN or IRS Form W-8BEN-E (or other applicable or successor form) certifying qualification for the reduced rate. Dividends that are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the U.S. or, in the case of an applicable income tax treaty, are attributable to a permanent establishment in the U.S., are not subject to the withholding tax, but instead are subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis at applicable individual or corporate rates. In such a case, Non-U.S. Holders must comply with certain certification requirements (generally by providing an IRS Form W-8ECI) in order for effectively connected income to be exempt from withholding tax. A Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation may also be subject to a “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate (or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable tax treaty) of its “effectively connected earnings and profits,” subject to certain adjustments.

Gain on Disposition

Subject to the discussion below under “—Information Reporting and Backup Withholding” and “—FATCA”, a Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain realized upon the sale or disposition of shares of our common stock unless:

the gain is effectively connected with such holder’s conduct of a U.S. trade or business (or, if an income tax treaty applies, the gain is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained by such holder in the U.S.);


87

such holder is an individual who is present in the U.S. for a period or periods aggregating 183 days or more during the calendar year in which the sale or disposition occurs and certain other conditions are met; or


shares of our common stock constitute a “United States real property interest” by reason of our status as a “United States real property holding company” (“USRPHC”) at any time within the shorter of the five-year period preceding such holder’s disposition of, or such holder’s holding period for, shares of our common stock.

UNDERWRITING
We believe that we currently are offeringa USRPHC and will continue to be a USRPHC for the foreseeable future. As a USRPHC, as long as shares of our common stock are regularly traded on an established securities market, shares of our common stock will be treated as a U.S. real property interest only with respect to a Non-U.S. Holder that actually or constructively owns more than 5% of shares of our common stock at any time during the shorter of the five-year period preceding the date of disposition of, or the holder’s holding period for, shares of our common stock. Because the shares of our common stock will be listed on the NASDAQ, shares of our common stock are expected to be regularly traded on an established securities market. However, no assurance can be provided in this regard. If any gain on a Non-U.S. Holder’s disposition of shares of our common stock is taxable because we are a USRPHC and such Non-U.S. Holder’s ownership of shares of our common stock exceeds 5%, then such Non-U.S. Holder generally will be taxed on such disposition in the manner applicable to U.S. persons. That is, the holder will generally recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) such holder’s adjusted tax basis in the stock sold, and (ii) the amount realized in connection with such disposition, and have a U.S. tax obligation respecting such gain as well as a tax return filing obligation related thereto. In addition, a corporate Non-U.S. Holder of our common stock may be subject to an additional branch profits tax at a rate of 30% (or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty), as adjusted for certain items. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Non-U.S. Holder that is a “qualified foreign pension fund” as defined in Section 897(l) of the IRC generally will not be subject to U.S. Federal income tax upon the disposition of shares of our common stock, nor will such holder generally incur a U.S. Federal income tax return filing obligation as a result of such disposition, regardless of the percentage of shares of our common stock owned.

If a holder is a Non-U.S. Holder described in this prospectusthe first bullet above, such holder will be required to pay tax on the net gain derived from the sale or other disposition of shares of our common stock under regular graduated U.S. federal income tax rates. A corporate Non-U.S. Holder described in the first bullet above may also be subject to the branch profits on its effectively connected earnings and profits, as adjusted, at a 30% rate, or such lower rate as may be specified by meansan applicable income tax treaty. If a holder is a Non-U.S. Holder described in the second bullet above, such holder will be required to pay a flat 30% tax on the gain derived from the sale, which tax may be offset by U.S.-source capital losses for the year.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

We must report annually to the IRS and to each Non-U.S. Holder the amount of dividends paid to such holder and the tax withheld with respect to such dividends, regardless of whether withholding was required. Copies of the information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which the Non-U.S. Holder resides under the provisions of an underwritten public offering. applicable income tax treaty (or similar information exchange agreement). A Non-U.S. Holder will be subject to backup withholding for distributions paid to such holder, unless such holder certifies, under penalties of perjury, that it is not a U.S. person (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that such holder is a U.S. person), or such holder otherwise establishes an exemption.

Information reporting and, depending on the circumstances, backup withholding will apply to the proceeds of a sale or other disposition of shares of our common stock within the U.S. or conducted through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries, unless the beneficial owner certifies, under penalties of perjury, that it is not a U.S. person (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the beneficial owner is a U.S. person), or such owner otherwise establishes an exemption.

Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against the Non-U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required information is furnished to the IRS.

FATCA

Sections 1471 through 1474 of the IRC, and the Treasury Regulations and administrative guidance issued thereunder (“FATCA”), impose a 30% withholding tax on any dividends paid on shares of our common stock and on the gross proceeds from a disposition (or deemed disposition) of shares of our common stock (if such disposition or deemed disposition occurs after December 31, 2018), in each case if paid to a “foreign financial institution” or a “non-financial foreign entity” (each as defined in the IRC) (including, in some cases, when such foreign financial institution or non-financial foreign entity acts as an intermediary), unless (i) in the case of a foreign financial institution, such institution enters into an agreement with the U.S. government to withhold on certain payments, and to collect and provide to the U.S. tax authorities certain information regarding U.S. account holders of such institution, (ii) in the case of a non-financial foreign entity, such entity certifies that it does not have any “substantial United States owners” (as defined in the IRC) or provides the applicable withholding agent with a certification (generally on an IRS Form W-8BEN-E) identifying the direct and indirect substantial U.S. owners of such entity, or (iii) the foreign financial institution or non-financial foreign entity otherwise qualifies for an exemption from these rules and provides appropriate documentation (such as an IRS Form W-8BEN-E). Foreign financial institutions in countries that have entered into an intergovernmental agreement with the U.S. to implement FATCA may be subject to different rules. Under certain circumstances, a holder might be eligible for a refund or credit of such taxes.

The rules under FATCA are complex. Holders are encouraged to consult their own tax advisers regarding the implications of FATCA for their ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock.

THE PRECEDING DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND IS NOT TAX ADVICE. EACH HOLDER OF SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK SHOULD CONSULT ITS OWN TAX ADVISER REGARDING THE PARTICULAR U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF HOLDING AND DISPOSING OF SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK, INCLUDING THE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY PROPOSED CHANGE IN APPLICABLE LAWS AND ANY APPLICABLE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

UNDERWRITING

We have entered into a firm commitmentan underwriting agreement with the underwriters named below.Roth Capital Partners, LLC, as sole underwriter and book-running manager (the “underwriter”). Subject to the terms and conditions of the underwriting agreement, we have agreed to sell to the underwriters,underwriter, and the underwriters haveunderwriter has agreed to purchase the aggregate number of shares of our common stock set forth opposite their respective names belowfrom us at the public offering price less the underwriting discountdiscounts and commissions set forth on the cover page of this prospectus.

Underwriters
Number of Shares
Janney Montgomery Scott LLC. 
Total
The underwriting agreement is subjectprospectus,             shares of our common stock. We intend to a number of terms and conditions and may be terminated byapply to have the underwriters incommon stock listed on the event of a material adverse change in economic, political or financial conditions. The obligations ofNASDAQ Global Market under the underwriters also may be terminated upon the occurrence of other events specified in the underwriting agreement. symbol “GWRS.”

The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters must buyobligation of the underwriter to purchase the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus is subject to certain terms and conditions. The underwriter is obligated to purchase all of the shares of common stock offered hereby if they buy any of them. The underwriters will sell the shares to the public when and if the underwriters buy the shares from us.

The underwriters initially will offer the shares of our common stock to the public at the price specified on the cover page of this prospectus. The underwriters may allow a concession of not more than $      per share to selected dealers. The underwriters may allow, and selected dealers may re-allow, a concession not in excess of $      per share to brokers and dealers. If all of the shares of common stock are not sold at the public offering price, the underwriters may change the public offering price and the other selling terms. The shares of our common stock are offered subject to a number of conditions, including:
• the registration statement, of which the prospectus is a part, has been declared effective;
• the representations and warranties made by us to the underwriters are true;
• there is no material adverse change in our business;
• the shares of our common stock to be sold in this offering have been approved for listing on the Nasdaq Global Select Market;
• we deliver customary closing documents to the underwriters;
• receipt and acceptance of the common stock by the underwriters; and
• the underwriters’ right to reject orders in whole or in part.
Over-Allotment Option.purchased.

We have granted the underwritersunderwriter an over-allotment option to buy up to          additional shares of our common stock at the public offering price, specifiedless the underwriting discounts and commissions set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, less underwriting discounts and commissions. These additional shares of our common stock may only be used to cover sales of shares by the underwriters that exceed the total number of shares of our common stock described above.over-allotments, if any. The underwritersunderwriter may exercise this option at any time, within 30 daysin whole or in part, during the 30-day period after the date of this prospectus. If any additional shares of common stock are purchased, the underwriter will offer the additional shares of our common stock will be sold by the underwriters on the same terms as those on which the other shares are sold. We will paybeing offered.

Discounts, Commissions and Expenses

The underwriter proposes to offer the expenses associatedshares of our common stock purchased pursuant to the underwriting agreement to the public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and to certain dealers at that price less a concession not in excess of $            per share. After this offering, the public offering price and concession may be changed by the underwriter.

In connection with the exercisesale of the shares of our common stock to be purchased by the underwriter, the underwriter will be deemed to have received compensation in the form of underwriting commissions and discounts. The underwriter’s commissions and discounts will be 7.0% of the gross proceeds of this option.


88

offering, or $            per share of our common stock, based on the public offering price per share set forth on the cover page of this prospectus.


Subject to Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) Rule 5110, we have agreed to reimburse the underwriter at closing for (i) all reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses not to exceed $150,000 and (ii) all other out-of-pocket fees and expenses, including any expenses relating to the clearance of this offering with FINRA. We estimate that total expenses of this offering, including registration, filing, listing and printing fees, legal and accounting expenses and reimbursement of the underwriter’s fees and expenses (but excluding the underwriting discounts and commissions), will be approximately $            .

Discount and Commissions.The following table shows the per share and total underwriting discounts and commissions to be paidpayable to the underwritersunderwriter by us. These amounts are shown assuming nous in connection with this offering (assuming both the exercise and full exercisenon-exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares of our common stock.
that we have granted to the underwriter):

   Per Share   Total 
   Total Paid By Us
No ExerciseWithout
Option to
Purchase
Additional
Shares
   Full ExerciseWith
Option to
Purchase
Additional
Shares
Without
Option to
Purchase
Additional
Shares
With
Option to
Purchase
Additional
Shares
 

Public offering price

Per Share$$  $                $              
Total

Underwriting discounts and commissions

  $                $$$

Proceeds to us, before expenses

$$$$  
We estimate

Indemnification

Pursuant to the underwriting agreement, we have agreed to indemnify the underwriter against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, or to contribute to payments that the expensesunderwriter or such other indemnified parties may be required to make in respect of this offering to be paid by us, not including underwriting discounts and commissions, will be approximately $     .

Listing.those liabilities.

Lock-Up Agreements

We have appliedagreed not to:

offer, pledge, announce the intention to have our common stock approved for quotation/listing on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol GWRI.
Stabilization.  In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in activities that stabilize, maintainsell, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, or otherwise affect the pricetransfer or dispose of, our common stock, including:
• stabilizing transactions;
• short sales;
• syndicate covering transactions;
• purchases to cover positions created by short sales; and
• penalty bids.
Stabilizing transactions consist of bidsdirectly or purchases made for the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of our common stock while this offering is in progress. Stabilizing transactions may include making short sales of our common stock, which involves the sale by the underwriters of a greater number of shares of common stock than they are required to purchase in this offering, and purchasing shares of common stock from us or on the open market to cover positions created by short sales. Short sales may be “covered” shorts, which are short positions in an amount not greater than the underwriters’ over-allotment option referred to above, or may be “naked” shorts, which are short positions in excess of that amount. Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of our common stock in the open market after the distribution has been completed in order to cover syndicate short positions.
The underwriters may close outindirectly, any covered short position either by exercising their over-allotment option, in whole or in part, or by purchasing shares of our common stock in the open market. In making this determination, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of shares of our common stock available for purchase in the open market compared to the price at which the underwriters may purchase shares of our common stock through the over-allotment option.
A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of shares of our common stock in the open market that could adversely affect investors who purchased shares of our common stock in this offering. To the extent that the underwriters create a naked short position, they will purchase shares of our common stock in the open market to cover the position.
The underwriters may also impose a penalty bid. Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when the shares of the common stock originally sold by that syndicate member are purchased in a stabilizing transaction or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate short positions. The imposition of a penalty bid may have an effect on the price of the common stock to the extent that it may discourage resales of the common stock.
These activities may have the effect of raising or maintaining the market price of shares of our common stock or preventingany securities convertible into, or retarding a decline in the market price of shares ofexercisable or exchangeable for, our common stock. As a result of these activities, the price of shares of our common stock may be higher than the price that otherwise mightstock;


89


exist in the open market. If the underwriters commence the activities, they may discontinue them at any time. The underwriter may carry out these transactions on the Nasdaq Global Select Market, in the over-the-counter market or otherwise.
IPO Pricing.  Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for shares of our common stock. The initial public offering price has been determined by negotiation between us and the underwriters. Among the factors considered in these negotiations were:
• the history of, and prospects for, our company and the industry in which we compete;
• our past and present financial performance;
• an assessment of our management;
• the present state of our development;
• the prospects for our future earnings;
• the prevailing conditions of the applicable U.S. securities market at the time of this offering;
• market valuations of publicly traded companies that we and the underwriters believe to be comparable to us; and
• other factors that we may deem relevant.
Lock-up Agreements.  We and our executive officers, directors, director nominees and existing shareholders have entered intolock-up agreements with Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, on behalf of the underwriters. Under our agreement with the underwriters, subject to certain exceptions, we may not issue any new shares of our common stock other than the shares of our common stock, options to purchase shares of our common stock or common stock issuable upon exercise of options issued under our equity incentive plans or upon exercise or conversion of currently outstanding exercisable or convertible securities.
Under agreements with Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, on behalf of the underwriters, the holders of substantially all shares of our common stock may not, directly or indirectly, offer to sell, sell, pledge, contract to sell or otherwise transfer or dispose of, enter into any swap or any other agreement or any transaction that transfers, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly,any of the economic consequenceconsequences of ownership of or engage in any short selling of any shares of our common stockstock; or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock, or publicly disclose the intention to do any of the foregoing, without the prior written consent of Janney Montgomery Scott LLC for a period of 180 days from the effective date of the registration statement of which the prospectus forms a part. Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, in its sole discretion, may release the securities subject to thelock-up agreements in whole or in part at any time with or without notice. Janney Montgomery Scott LLC has advised us that when determining whether to release such securities from thelock-up agreements, it will consider, among other factors, the holder’s reasons for requesting the release, the number of securities for which the release is being requested and market conditions at the time of the request for such release. Janney Montgomery Scott LLC has further advised us that it does not at this time have any intention of releasing any of the securities subject to thelock-up agreements prior to the expiration of thelock-up period. In addition, during this180-day period we also have agreed not to

file any registration statement for, and each of our officers and stockholders has agreed not to exercise any demand, mandatory, piggyback, optional or any other registration rights with respectthe SEC relating to the registrationoffering of any shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for, shares of our common stock, without the prior written consent of Janney Montgomery Scott LLC,the underwriter for a period of 180 days following the date of this prospectus, subject to an 18-day extension under certain limited circumstances (the “Lock-Up Period”).

This consent may be given at any time without public notice. These restrictions on future issuances are subject to exceptions for:

the issuance of shares of our common stock sold in this offering, including pursuant to the option to purchase additional shares and pursuant to the Reorganization Transaction;

the issuance of shares of our common stock upon the exercise of outstanding options or warrants and the vesting of restricted stock awards or units;

the issuance of employee stock options not exercisable during the Lock-Up Period and the grant, redemption or forfeiture of restricted stock awards or restricted stock units pursuant to our equity incentive plans or as new employee inducement grants; and

the issuance of common stock or warrants to purchase common stock in connection with mergers or acquisitions of securities, businesses, property or other thanassets, joint ventures, strategic alliances, equipment leasing arrangements or debt financing.

In addition, our officers and directors and certain of our stockholders expect to enter into a lock-up agreement with the underwriter. Under the lock-up agreements, our officers and directors and certain of our stockholders may not, without the prior written consent of the underwriter, during the Lock-Up Period:

offer, pledge, announce the intention to sell, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, or file (or participate in the filing of) a registration statement onForm S-8with the SEC in respect of, any shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for, shares of our common stock;

enter into any swap or other agreement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of the shares of our common stock;

make any demand for, or exercise any right with respect to, registerthe registration of any shares of our common stock; or

publicly announce an intention to effect any transaction specified above.

These restrictions on future dispositions by our officers and directors and certain of our stockholders are subject to exceptions for:

transfers as a bona fide gift or gifts (so long as the donee or donees agree to be bound in writing by the lock-up restrictions);

transfers to any trust for the direct or indirect benefit of the covered person or the immediate family of the covered person (so long as the trustee of the trust agrees to be bound in writing by the lock-up restrictions and any such transfer does not involve a disposition for value);

the acquisition or exercise of any stock option issued pursuant to our existing stock option plan; or

the purchase or sale of our securities pursuant to a plan, contract or instruction that satisfies all of the requirements of Rule 10b5-1(c)(1)(i)(B) that was in effect prior to the date of this prospectus.

Electronic Distribution

This prospectus may be made available in electronic format on websites or through other online services maintained by the underwriter. In those cases, prospective investors may view offering terms online and prospective investors may be allowed to place orders online. Other than this prospectus in electronic format, the information on the underwriter’s website or our website and any information contained in any other websites maintained by the underwriter, by us is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved and/or endorsed by us or the underwriter in its capacity as underwriter, and should not be relied upon by investors.

Price Stabilization, Short Positions and Penalty Bids

In connection with the offering, the underwriter may engage in stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids in accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act:

Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum.

Over-allotment involves sales by the underwriter of shares in excess of the number of shares the underwriter is obligated to purchase, which creates a syndicate short position. The short position may be either a covered short position or a naked short position. In a covered short position, the number of shares over-allotted by the underwriter is not greater than the number of shares that they may purchase in the option to purchase additional shares. In a naked short position, the number of shares involved is greater than the number of shares in the option to purchase additional shares. The underwriter may close out any covered short position by either exercising their option to purchase additional shares and/or purchasing shares in the open market.

Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common stock in the open market after the distribution has been completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In determining the source of shares to close out the short position, the underwriter will consider, among other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through the option to purchase additional shares. A naked short position occurs if the underwriter sells more shares than could be covered by the option to purchase additional shares. This position can only be closed out by buying shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriter is concerned that there could be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering.

Penalty bids permit the underwriter to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when the common stock originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate short positions.

These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the common stock. As a result, the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may be discontinued at any time.

Neither we nor the underwriter makes any representation or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of the shares of our common stock. In addition, neither we nor the underwriter makes any representation that the underwriter will engage in these transactions or that any transaction, if commenced, will not be discontinued without notice.

The underwriter has provided in the past, and may provide from time to time in the future, financial advisory and related services for us and our affiliates—including acting as OTCQX Advisor and Principal American Liaison for GWRC—in the ordinary course of its business, for which it has received and may continue to receive customary fees and commissions. In addition, from time to time, the underwriter may effect transactions for its own account or for the account of its customers, and hold on behalf of itself or its customers, long or short positions in our securities.

Selling Restrictions

Other than in the United States, no action has been taken by us or the underwriter that would permit a public offering of the securities offered by this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. The securities offered by this prospectus may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, nor may this prospectus or any other offering material or advertisements in connection with the offer and sale of any such securities be distributed or published in any jurisdiction, except under circumstances that will result in compliance with the applicable rules and regulations of that jurisdiction. Outside of the United States, persons into whose possession this prospectus comes are advised to inform themselves about and to observe any restrictions imposed by any applicable laws and regulations outside of the United States relating to the offering and the distribution of this prospectus. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities offered by this prospectus in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or a solicitation is unlawful.

European Economic Area

This prospectus does not constitute an approved prospectus under the Prospectus Directive and no such prospectus is intended to be prepared and approved in connection with this offering. Accordingly, in relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a “Relevant Member State”), an offer to the public of any shares of common stock which are the subject of the offering contemplated by this prospectus may not be made in that Relevant Member State except that an offer to the public in that Relevant Member State of any shares of common stock may be made at any time under the following exemptions under the Prospectus Directive, if and to the extent that they have been implemented in that Relevant Member State:

to any legal entity which is a qualified investor as defined in the Prospectus Directive;

to fewer than 100 or, if the Relevant Member State has implemented the relevant provision of the 2010 PD Amending Directive, 150, natural or legal persons (other than qualified investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive), subject to obtaining the prior consent of the representatives of the underwriter for any such offer; or

in any other circumstances which do not require any person to publish a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.

For the purposes of this provision, the expression an “offer to the public” in relation to any shares of common stock in any Relevant Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and any shares of common stock to be offered so as to enable an

investor to decide to purchase any shares of common stock, as the expression may be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member State, and the expression “Prospectus Directive” means Directive 2003/71/EC (and any amendments thereto including the 2010 PD Amending Directive to the extent implemented in each Relevant Member State) and includes any relevant implementing measure in each Relevant Member State and the expression “2010 PD Amending Directive” means Directive 2010/73/EU.

Israel

This document does not constitute a prospectus under the Israeli Securities Law, 5728-1968, and has not been filed with, or approved by, the Israel Securities Authority. In Israel, this prospectus is being distributed only to, and is directed only at, investors listed in the first addendum (the “Addendum”) to the Israeli Securities Law, consisting primarily of joint investment in trust funds, provident funds, insurance companies, banks, portfolio managers, investment advisors, members of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, underwriters purchasing for their own account, venture capital funds, entities with equity in excess of NIS 50 million and “qualified individuals,” each as defined in the Addendum, as it may be amended from time to time. These investors may be required to submit written confirmation that they fall within the scope of the Addendum.

United Kingdom

This prospectus is not an approved prospectus for purposes of the UK Prospectus Rules, as implemented under the Prospectus Directive, and has not been approved under section 21 of the UK Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, as amended (the “FSMA”), by a person authorized under FSMA. The financial promotions contained in this prospectus are directed at, and this prospectus is only being distributed to, (1) persons who receive this prospectus outside of the United Kingdom, (2) persons in the United Kingdom who fall within the exemptions under articles 19 (investment professionals) and 49(2)(a) to (d) (high net worth companies, unincorporated associations, etc.) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “Order”), and (3) persons in the United Kingdom who fall within the exemption under article 49(2)(e) of the Order to whom this prospectus may otherwise be lawfully distributed (all such persons together being referred to as “Relevant Persons”). This prospectus must not be acted upon or relied upon by any person who is not a Relevant Person. Any investment or investment activity to which this prospectus relates is available only to Relevant Persons and will be engaged in only with Relevant Persons. This prospectus and its contents are confidential and should not be distributed, published or reproduced (in whole or in part) or disclosed by recipients to any other person that is not a Relevant Person.

Each underwriter has represented, warranted and agreed that:

it has only communicated or caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause to be communicated any invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of section 21 of the FSMA) in connection with the issue or sale of any of the shares of common stock in circumstances in which section 21(1) of the FSMA does not apply; and

it has complied with and will comply with all applicable provisions of the FSMA with respect to anything done by it in relation to the shares of common stock in, from or otherwise involving the United Kingdom.

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the shares of our common stock options to purchase shares of our common stock and shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of options pursuant to any stock option, stock bonus or other stock plan or arrangement described in this prospectus. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if we issue an earnings release or material news or a material event relating to us occurs during the last 17 days of this180-day period or prior to the expiration of this180-day period or we announce that we will release earnings results during the16-day period beginning on the last day of this180-day period, the restrictions imposed bylock-up agreements shall


90


continue to apply until the expiration of the180-day period beginning on the issuance of such earnings release or the occurrence of such material news or material event.
Directed Share Program.  At our request, certain of the underwriters have reserved for sale, at the initial public offering price, up to           shares of our common stock being offered for sale to some of our directors, officers, employees and other persons having a business relationship with us, our affiliates or persons with whom we have a business relationship. At the discretion of our management, these other parties, including our employees, may participate in the reserved share program. The number of shares available for sale to the general public in this offering will be reduced to the extent these persons purchase reserved shares. Any reserved shares not so purchased will be offered by the underwriters to the general public on the same terms as the other shares.
Indemnification.  We will indemnify the underwriters against some liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. If we are unable to provide this indemnification, we will contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to make in respect of those liabilities.
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of our common stock offered by this prospectushereby will be passed upon for us by Powell GoldsteinSnell & Wilmer L.L.P., Phoenix, Arizona. The underwriter is being represented by Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Atlanta, Georgia. Certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be passed upon for the underwriters by Squire, Sanders & Dempsey LLP, Cleveland, Ohio.
Seattle, Washington.

EXPERTS

The combined consolidated financial statements of Global Water Resources, LLCInc. and its subsidiaries and Global Water Management, LLC as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the three years in the periodyear ended December 31, 20072014, included in this prospectus, and related registration statement have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein, and areherein. Such consolidated financial statements have been so included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.


91


WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement onForm S-1 under the Securities Act with respectthe SEC to register with the SEC the shares of our common stock being offered hereby.in this prospectus. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement or the exhibits and schedules filed herewith.with it. For further information with respect toabout us and theour common stock, offered hereby, reference is made to the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed therewith.with it. Statements contained in this prospectus regarding the contents of any contract or any other document that is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement are not necessarily complete, and each such statement is qualified in all respects by reference to the full text of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. A copy of the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed herewith may be inspected without charge at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of these materials may be obtained from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 upon the payment of the fees prescribed by the SEC. Please call the SEC at1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference facility. The SEC also maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC. The address of the SEC’s website ishttp://www.sec.gov.

Upon completion of

When we complete this offering, we will become subjectalso be required to the informationfile annual, quarterly and periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, and in accordance therewith, will file periodicspecial reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. Such periodic reports, proxy statementsYou may read and othercopy this information will be available for inspection and copying at the SEC’s public reference rooms andPublic Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the SEC’s website.


92

operation of the Public Reference Room. Our filings, including the registration statement, will also be available to you on the Internet website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov.


We also maintain an Internet website at www.gwresources.com. Our website and the information contained therein or connected thereto shall not be deemed to be incorporated into this prospectus or the registration statement of which it forms a part.

-F-1-


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Global Water Resources, LLC and Global Water Management, LLC

Inc.

Phoenix, Arizona

We have audited the accompanying combined consolidated balance sheetssheet of Global Water Resources, LLCInc. and subsidiaries and Global Water Management, LLC (collectively, the(the “Company”), both of which are under common ownership and common management, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006,2014, and the related combined consolidated statements of income, members’operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2007.2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe financial statements based on our audits.

audit.

We conducted our auditsaudit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our auditsaudit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such combined consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the CompanyGlobal Water Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 20062014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the periodyear ended December 31, 2007,2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona

May 13, 2008


F-2January 19, 2016

-F-2-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC
INC.


COMBINED

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
SHEET

As of December 31, 2007 and 2006

         
  2007  2006 
 
ASSETS
         
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:        
Property, plant and equipment $241,975,967  $179,330,239 
Less accumulated depreciation  (11,744,158)  (6,581,502)
         
Net property, plant and equipment  230,231,809   172,748,737 
         
CURRENT ASSETS:        
Cash and cash equivalents  166,496   414,017 
Accounts receivable — net  1,983,757   1,945,777 
Security deposits receivable  741,350   364,950 
Other receivables  10,470   81,230 
Accrued utility revenue  332,911   221,188 
Infrastructure coordination and financing fees receivable  97,500   255,450 
Income tax receivable  81,544    
Stored water credits  713,894    
Prepaid expense  465,207   197,876 
Other current assets  35,016   246,713 
Deferred tax asset—current  876,131   98,210 
         
Total current assets  5,504,276   3,825,411 
         
OTHER ASSETS:        
Goodwill  45,809,111   45,809,111 
Other intangible assets — net  33,623,035   36,643,193 
Deposits  668,546   749,411 
Bond reserve fund and other restricted cash  9,298,254   3,884,225 
Debt issuance costs — net  2,821,652   1,572,488 
Deferred acquisition costs  108,262   78,527 
         
Total other assets  92,328,860   88,736,955 
         
TOTAL $328,064,945  $265,311,103 
         
2014

   December 31, 2014 
   (in thousands of US$,
except share data)
 

ASSETS

  

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:

  

Property, plant and equipment

  $318,995  

Less accumulated depreciation

   (78,571
  

 

 

 

Net property, plant and equipment

   240,424  
  

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS:

  

Cash and cash equivalents

   6,577  

Accounts receivable—net

   1,365  

Due from related party

   645  

Accrued revenue

   1,762  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   353  

Deferred tax assets—current

   1,591  
  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   12,293  
  

 

 

 

OTHER ASSETS:

  

Goodwill

   13,082  

Intangible assets—net

   12,772  

Regulatory assets

   400  

Deposits

   25  

Bond service fund and other restricted cash

   9,927  

Debt issuance costs—net

   2,722  

Convertible note

   —    

Equity method investment—related party

   1,150  

Deferred tax assets

   14,806  
  

 

 

 

Total other assets

   54,884  
  

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

  $307,601  
  

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

  

Accounts payable

  $1,531  

Accrued expenses

   6,832  

Deferred revenue

   13  

Customer and meter deposits

   2,601  

Long-term debt—current portion

   2,653  
  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   13,630  
  

 

 

 

NONCURRENT LIABILITIES:

  

Long-term debt

   127,491  

Deferred regulatory gain

   19,730  

Regulatory liability

   7,859  

Advances in aid of construction

   89,206  

Contributions in aid of construction—net

   17,096  

Deferred income tax liability

   —    

Acquisition liability

   4,688  

Other noncurrent liabilities

   221  
  

 

 

 

Total noncurrent liabilities

   266,291  
  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   279,921  
  

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (see Note 14)

  

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY :

  

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 182,050 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014

   2  

Paid in capital

   50,639  

Accumulated deficit

   (22,961
  

 

 

 

Total equity

   27,680  
  

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  $307,601  
  

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to combinedthe consolidated financial statements.

statements


F-3

-F-3-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

COMBINED INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As ofSTATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

For the Year Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006

         
  2007  2006 
 
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ EQUITY
        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES:        
Accounts payable $3,481,647  $9,829,512 
Accrued expenses  9,169,248   6,983,052 
Members’ distributions payable  2,042,458   7,908,988 
Income tax payable     212,067 
Accrued acquisition payment  13,364,408   13,934,225 
Customer and meter deposits  1,192,420   865,290 
Loan payable—current portion  137,861   146,061 
         
         
Total current liabilities  29,388,042   39,879,195 
         
         
DEFERRED CREDITS AND OTHER LIABILITIES:        
Bonds payable  90,115,055   36,495,000 
Bank loans payable  38,041,833   24,087,692 
Deferred revenue and prepaid ICFA fees  39,235,381   40,582,116 
Advances in aid of construction  69,405,414   51,063,891 
Contributions in aid of construction—net  792,127   4,603,541 
Deferred income tax liability  7,169,614   5,245,941 
Acquisition liability  42,502,507   44,453,409 
         
         
Total deferred credits and other liabilities  287,261,931   206,531,590 
         
         
Total liabilities  316,649,973   246,410,785 
         
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
(Notes 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 13)        
         
MEMBERS’ EQUITY:        
Contributed capital  26,001,000   26,001,000 
Undistributed preferred return  14,357   2,126,556 
Common unit deficit  (14,600,385)  (9,227,238)
         
Total members’ equity  11,414,972   18,900,318 
         
TOTAL $328,064,945  $265,311,103 
         
2014

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2014 
   (in thousands of US$) 

REVENUES:

  

Water services

  $18,076  

Wastewater and recycled water services

   14,112  

Unregulated revenues

   371  
  

 

 

 

Total revenues

   32,559  
  

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

  

Operations and maintenance

   8,020  

Operations and maintenance—related party

   2,398  

General and administrative

   8,809  

Gain on regulatory order

   (50,664

Depreciation

   9,205  
  

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

   (22,232
  

 

 

 

OPERATING INCOME

   54,791  
  

 

 

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):

  

Interest income

   79  

Interest expense

   (9,512

Other

   2,162  

Other—related party

   416  
  

 

 

 

Total other income (expense)

   (6,855
  

 

 

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

   47,936  

INCOME TAX BENEFIT

   16,995  
  

 

 

 

NET INCOME

  $64,931  
  

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

  $356.67  

Diluted earnings per common share

  $356.67  

Dividends declared per common share

  C$22.40  

Dividends declared per common share

  $20.49  

Weighted average number of common shares used in the determination of:

  

Basic earnings per common share

   182,050  

Diluted earnings per common share

   182,050  

See accompanying notes to combinedthe consolidated financial statements.

statements


F-4

-F-4-


             
  2007  2006  2005 
 
OPERATING REVENUES:            
Water usage $11,971,773  $8,364,337  $3,780,184 
Wastewater services  5,714,272   4,526,939   2,732,303 
Infrastructure coordination and financing fees  6,595,792   5,951,512   4,346,527 
Meter installation and connection fees  1,059,471   1,534,808   1,536,602 
Developer, management and other fees  467,648   471,608   547,060 
             
             
Total operating revenues  25,808,956   20,849,204   12,942,676 
             
             
OPERATING EXPENSES:            
Operations and maintenance  2,637,084   1,466,825   792,125 
General and administrative  9,974,021   6,754,380   3,412,802 
Depreciation  5,989,141   3,364,733   1,586,718 
Amortization of intangible assets  2,623,865   2,236,126   1,751,506 
             
             
Total operating expenses  21,224,111   13,822,064   7,543,151 
             
             
OPERATING INCOME  4,584,845   7,027,140   5,399,525 
             
             
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):            
Interest income  379,519   31,727   1,648 
Interest expense—net of $4,644,747, $2,870,360 and $891,533 capitalized in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively  (4,328,691)  (1,447,647)  (6,519)
Other  (30,761)  (34,168)  18,884 
             
             
Total other income (expense)  (3,979,933)  (1,450,088)  14,013 
             
             
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES  604,912   5,577,052   5,413,538 
             
INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE  (1,404,135)  (740,040)   
             
             
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS  2,009,047   6,317,092   5,413,538 
             
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX of $2,548,023, $30,478, and $43,585, in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively  4,060,276   267,216   71,922 
             
             
NET INCOME $6,069,323  $6,584,308  $5,485,460 
             
2014

   Common
Stock
   Paid-in
Capital
  Accumulated
Deficit
  Total
Equity
 
   (in thousands of US$) 

BALANCE—December 31, 2013

  $2    $55,048   $(87,892 $(32,842

Dividend declared C$22.40 per share declared ($20.49
per share)

   —       (3,904  —      (3,904

Stock-based compensation

   —       (8  —      (8

Deemed distribution to related party

   —       (497  —      (497

Net income

   —       —      64,931    64,931  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

BALANCE—December 31, 2014

  $2    $50,639   $(22,961 $27,680  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to combinedthe consolidated financial statements.

statements


F-5

-F-5-


                 
     Undistributed
     Total
 
  Contributed
  Preferred
  Common Unit
  Members’
 
  Capital  Return  Earnings (Deficit)  Equity 
 
BALANCE—January 1, 2005 $27,501,000  $1,124,377  $(147,657)  $28,477,720 
Distributions—return of capital  (1,500,000)        (1,500,000)
Distributions—preferred return     (4,555,737)     (4,555,737)
Distributions—taxes        (4,119,647)  (4,119,647)
Net income     3,431,360   2,054,100   5,485,460 
                 
BALANCE—December 31, 2005 $26,001,000     $(2,213,204)  $23,787,796 
Distributions—taxes        (11,471,786)  (11,471,786)
Net income     2,126,556   4,457,752   6,584,308 
                 
BALANCE—December 31, 2006 $26,001,000  $2,126,556  $(9,227,238)  $18,900,318 
Distributions—preferred return     (4,378,232)     (4,378,232)
Distributions—taxes        (9,176,437)  (9,176,437)
Net income     2,266,033   3,803,290   6,069,323 
                 
BALANCE—December 31, 2007 $26,001,000  $14,357  $(14,600,385) $11,414,972 
                 
2014

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2014 
   (in thousands of US$) 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

  

Net income

  $64,931  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

  

Deferred compensation

   1,361  

Depreciation

   9,205  

Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and discounts

   334  

Write-off of debt issuance costs

   696  

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

   6  

Gain on equity method investment

   (144

Gain on regulatory order

   (50,664

Other gains

   (56

Provision for doubtful accounts receivable

   83  

Deferred income tax benefit

   (16,995

Changes in assets and liabilities:

  

Accounts receivable

   26  

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

   (227

Other noncurrent assets

   34  

Other noncurrent liabilities

   3,056  
  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   11,646  
  

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

  

Capital expenditures

   (1,655

Proceeds from the disposal of fixed assets

   16  

Withdrawals of restricted cash

   198  

Insurance proceeds from property damage claim

   8  

Deposits received

   2  
  

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

   (1,431
  

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

  

Repayments of bond debt

   (12,347

Deposits in bond service fund

   (1,000

Proceeds withdrawn from bond service fund

   626  

Loan borrowings

   21,800  

Loan repayments

   (10,390

Principal payments under capital leases

   (105

Debt issuance costs paid

   (346

Advances in aid of construction

   365  

Refunds of advances for construction

   (747

Dividends paid

   (3,454
  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (5,598
  

 

 

 

INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   4,617  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period

   1,960  
  

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period

  $6,577  
  

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to combinedthe consolidated financial statements.

statements


F-6

-F-6-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLCINC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1.DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

COMBINED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
             
  2007  2006  2005 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:            
Net income $6,069,323  $6,584,308  $5,485,460 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation  6,069,133   3,817,112   1,921,778 
Amortization of intangible assets  2,623,865   2,229,216   1,751,506 
Interest accretion on deferred payments for acquisitions  (95,363)  1,247,951    
(Gain) on sale of discontinued operations  (6,484,488)      
(Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets  35,361   (34,169)  4,262 
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)  1,145,753   (678,744)  43,585 
Changes in assets and liabilities—excluding effects of acquisitions:            
Accounts receivable  (37,980)  749   (717,766)
Other receivables  70,760   (446,180)   
Infrastructure coordination and financing fees receivable  157,950   517,248   (306,648)
Accrued utility revenue  (111,723)  (134,295)  (38,091)
Other current assets  (746,791)  (236,673)  32,748 
Income taxes payable  (293,611)  10,353    
Accounts payable and other current liabilities  (1,164,376)  4,361,633   (1,888,417)
Deferred revenue and prepaid ICFA fees  (1,346,735)  19,544,696   17,146,454 
             
Net cash provided by operating activities  5,891,078   36,783,205   23,434,871 
             
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:            
Capital expenditures  (67,842,091)  (51,171,979)  (27,692,818)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets  19,539,153   43,036   49,824 
Withdrawals (deposits) of restricted cash  29,475   (126,887)   
Deposits  (295,535)  (265,982)   
Intangible asset additions  (8,781)  (242,501)   
Acquisition of utilities—net of cash acquired     (15,547,028)  (5,920,963)
Deferred payments for acquisitions  (3,466,357)      
Deferred acquisition costs incurred  (29,735)  (46,432)  (47,709)
             
Net cash used in investing activities  (52,073,871)  (67,357,773)  (33,611,666)
             
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:            
Proceeds from bonds  53,624,175   36,495,000    
Proceeds deposited to bond reserve fund  (5,454,597)  (3,597,106)   
Bank loan borrowings  101,423,436   71,784,855   20,818,929 
Bank loan repayments  (87,477,495)  (72,396,729)  (5,165,506)
Debt issuance costs incurred  (1,332,650)  (1,447,265)   
Distributions to members  (19,421,198)  (4,824,970)  (8,737,644)
Advances in aid of construction  4,997,836   5,022,315   2,110,364 
Refunds of advances for construction  (424,235)  (185,697)  (26,405)
             
Net cash provided by financing activities  45,935,272   30,850,403   8,999,738 
             
(continued)


F-7


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

COMBINED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS—(Continued)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
             
  2007  2006  2005 
 
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS $(247,521) $275,835  $(1,177,057)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of year  414,017   138,182   1,315,239 
             
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of year $166,496  $414,017  $138,182 
             
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:            
Cash paid for interest $6,118,442  $2,752,422  $1,057,272 
             
Cash paid for income taxes $309,306  $  $ 
             
Acquisition liability incurred in connection with business combinations and acquisitions of intangible assets $  $39,939,225  $17,200,458 
             
Noncash advances in aid of construction—line extensions $16,287,132  $13,640,921  $1,908,744 
             
Capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued expenses $5,750,581  $8,805,836  $4,414,795 
             
Change in members’ distributions payable $(5,866,530) $6,646,818  $1,262,170 
             
See notes to combined consolidated financial statements.


F-8


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BasisBusiness—Global Water Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”, “GWRI”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) operate in the Western United States as a water resource management company that owns, operates and manages water, wastewater and recycled water utilities in strategically located communities, principally in metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona. The Company’s model focuses on the broad issues of Presentationwater supply and Principlesscarcity and applies principles of Combinationwater conservation through water reclamation and reuse. The Company’s basic premise is that the world’s water supply is limited and yet can be stretched significantly through effective planning, the use of recycled water and by providing individuals and communities resources that promote wise water usage practices. The Company deploys its integrated approach, Total Water Management (“TWM”), a term which it uses to mean managing the entire water cycle, both to conserve water and to maximize its total economic and social value. The Company uses TWM to promote sustainable communities in areas where it expects growth to outpace the existing potable water supply.

HistoryThe combined consolidated financial statements of Global Water Resources, LLC (“GWR”) and Global Water Management, LLC (“GWM”) include the accounts of GWR and all of its subsidiaries as well as GWM (collectively, the “Company”). GWR and GWM are under common ownership and common management. All intercompany account balances and transactions between GWR and its subsidiaries and GWM have been eliminated.

Business—GWR was organized in 2003 to acquire, own, and manage a portfolio of water and wastewater utilities in North America. GWMthe Southwestern United States. Global Water Management, LLC (“GWM”) was formed as an affiliated company to provide business development, management, construction project management, operations, and administrative services to GWR and all of its regulated subsidiaries.
Our regulated utilities are regulated by the Arizona Corporation Commission (the “Commission” or “ACC”).

On February 4, 2004, GWR purchased its first two utilities, Santa Cruz Water Company, LLC (“Santa Cruz”) and Palo Verde Utilities Company, LLC (“Palo Verde”) and Santa Cruz Water Company, LLC (“Santa Cruz”). Santa Cruz and Palo Verde provide water and wastewater operations, respectively, to residential and commercial customers in the vicinity of the City of Maricopa in Pinal County, AZArizona and are regulated by the Arizona Corporation Commission (the “Commission”). On June 15,ACC. Effective March 31, 2005, GWR executed the purchase ofpurchased the assets of Sonoran Utility Services, LLC (“Sonoran”), an unregulated utility, effective March 31, 2005.utility. The Sonoran assets arewere used to provide water and wastewater operations to residential and commercial customers in a water improvement district and a wastewater improvement district adjacent to the service area of Santa Cruz and Palo Verde. The Sonoran assets were contributed to Santa Cruz and Palo Verde upon acquisition.

In March 2005, Global Water, Inc. (“GWI”), an Arizona corporation, was established as a subsidiary of GWR to acquire, own, and manage a portfolio of water and wastewater utilities. On March 3, 2005, GWI purchased the issuedIn 2006, Santa Cruz and outstanding sharesPalo Verde were reorganized as C corporations and became subsidiaries of Cave Creek Water Company, Inc. (“Cave Creek”) and Pacer Equities, Inc. (“Pacer”). Cave Creek provided water utility operations and water distribution to residential and commercial customers in the vicinity of the Town of Cave Creek in Maricopa County, AZ and was regulated by the Commission. Pacer owned the water treatment facility utilized by Cave Creek. In 2007, the assets of Cave Creek and Pacer were sold to the Town of Cave Creek to settle a condemnation (see Note 10).

On July 6, 2005, GWI established Hassayampa Utilities Company, Inc. (“Hassayampa”). Hassayampa is astart-up wastewater utility that anticipates beginning to serve customers in western Maricopa County, AZ in 2010 upon completion of numerous permits and construction.
GWI.

On July 11, 2006, GWI acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of West Maricopa Combine (WMC)(“WMC”), the parent company of Valencia Water Company (“Valencia Water”) in the CityTown of Buckeye, Willow Valley Water Company (“Willow Valley”) near Bullhead City, Water Utility of Greater Buckeye (“Greater Buckeye”) near the town of Buckeye, Water Utility of Greater Tonopah (“Greater Tonopah”) west of the Hassayampa River, and Water Utility of Northern Scottsdale (“WUNS”Northern Scottsdale”) in northeast Scottsdale, all within the state of Arizona.

On December 30, 2006, GWI purchased the total issued and outstanding shares of Francisco Grande Utility Company (“FG”), an Arizona corporation owning the right to provide water and wastewater services near the cities of Maricopa and Casa Grande, Arizona. Also, on December 30, 2006, GWI purchased the total issued and outstanding sharesnet assets of CP Water Company (“CP”CP Water”), an Arizona corporation providing water services near the cities of Maricopa and Casa Grande, AZ.

Arizona.

GWI formed Global Water-Picacho Cove Water Company (“Picacho Water”) and Global Water-Picacho Cove Utilities Company (“Picacho”(collectively, “Picacho”) in October 2006, to provide integrated water, wastewater and recycled water service to an area in the vicinity of Eloy, Arizona along Interstate 10 about midway between Tucson and Phoenix.


F-9


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Transfer On April 8, 2008, the Commission approved the application for the creation of Assets and Change in Tax Status—In 2005, GWR concluded that the preferred legal form for Palo Verde and Santa Cruz was as corporations, and began the necessary actions to transfer the Certificatesa Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CC&Ns)(“CC&N”) for Picacho, granting it the exclusive right to provide services to an area of approximately 1,480 acres with 4,900 homes planned for the initial phase. On July 28, 2009, the Commission approved an expansion application for an additional 2,300 acres planned primarily for a rail served industrial park.

-F-7-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Reorganization—In early 2010, the members of GWR and GWM made the decision to raise money through the capital markets. The members established a new entity, GWR Global Water Resources Corp. (“GWRC”), relatedwhich was incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) to acquire shares of the Company. On December 30, 2010, GWRC completed its initial public offering in Canada (the “Offering”) on the Toronto Stock Exchange, raising gross proceeds totaling C$65,659,583 (including gross proceeds received January 28, 2011 of C$4,272,083 pursuant to the underwriters’ exercise of their over-allotment option). The proceeds of the Offering were used to acquire a 48.1% interest in the Company.

In connection with the Offering, GWR and GWM (collectively, “GWRI’s predecessor entities”) were reorganized to form GWRI (the “Reorganization”). Accordingly, all references herein to GWRI with respect to periods prior to December 30, 2010 should be understood as meaning GWRI’s predecessor entities.

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation—The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of GWRI and all of its subsidiaries. All intercompany account balances and transactions between GWRI and its subsidiaries have been eliminated.

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and utility operationsliabilities and disclosure of Palo Verdecontingent assets and Santa Cruz to newly formed corporations wholly owned by GWI, Global Water-Palo Verde Utilities Company (“GW-PV”) and Global Water-Santa Cruz Water Company (“GW-SC”), respectively. The transferliabilities at the date of the CC&Nsfinancial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The U.S. dollar is our reporting currency and the Company’s functional currency.

As a company with less than $1.0 billion in revenue during our last fiscal year, we qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). An emerging growth company may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. We may take advantage of these provisions for up to five years or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company. We have elected to take advantage of some of the reduced disclosure obligations regarding financial statements and may elect to take advantage of other reduced requirements in future filings. We may also take advantage of an extended transition period to comply with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies. If we choose to take advantage of this provision, we would not be required to comply with new or revised accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies.

Corporate TransactionsSale of certain MXA and WMA contracts—In September 2013, the Company sold its Wastewater Facilities Main Extension Agreements (“MXAs) and Offsite Water Management Agreements (“WMAs”) along with their related assetsrights and obligations to a third party (the “Transfer of Project Agreement”, or “Loop 303 Contracts”). Pursuant to the Transfer of Project Agreement, GWRI will receive total proceeds of approximately $4.1 million over a multi-year period. As part of the consideration, GWRI agreed to complete certain engineering work required Commission approval. On March 9, 2006, Palo Verde and Santa Cruz filed a joint application within the Commission for the transfer, to be effective retroactiveWMAs, which work had been completed prior to January 1, 2006. On October 25, 2006,2014. As the Commission’s Utility Division issued its Staff Report recommending approvalengineering work has been completed, the Company effectively has no further obligations under the WMAs, MXAs or the Transfer of Project Agreement. Prior to January 1, 2014, the application. An evidentiary hearing was held before an administrative law judge on January 12, 2007, at which no objectionsCompany had received $2.8 million of proceeds and recognized income of approximately $3.3 million within other income (expense) in the statement of operations related to the application were raised. The final Opinion and Order to approve the application effective January 1, 2006, was issued by the Commissiongain on September 27, 2007.

The memberssale of GWR agreed to assign all beneficial interests in distributionsthese agreements and the proceeds from any salereceived prior to January 1, 2014 for engineering work required in the WMAs. The Company received additional proceeds of approximately $296,000 in April 2015 and recognized those amounts as income at that time. Receipt of the member interestsremaining $1.0 million of Palo Verde or Santa Cruzproceeds will occur and be recorded as additional income over time as certain milestones are met between the third party acquirer and the developers/landowners.

-F-8-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to GW-PV or GW-SC, respectively, effective January 1, 2006. As a result, Palo Verde and Santa Cruz are considered to be consolidated subsidiaries of GW-PV and GW-SC for financial reporting and income tax purposes, effective January 1, 2006.

Consolidated Financial Statements

Significant Accounting PoliciesThe Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant accounting policies are as follows:

Use of EstimatesRegulationThe preparation ofOur regulated utilities and certain other balances are subject to regulation by the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires managementACC and are therefore subject to make estimatesAccounting Standards Codification Topic 980,Regulated Operations (“ASC Topic 980”) (See Note 3).

Property, plant and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assetsequipment—Property, plant and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Utility Plant—Utility plant in serviceequipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation provided on a straight-line basis at annual(see Note 4).

Depreciation rates ranging from 2% to 20% for each depreciable asset class as setclasses of utility property, plant and equipment are established by the CommissionCommission. The cost of additions, including betterments and replacements of units of utility fixed assets are charged to utility property, plant and equipment. When units of utility property are replaced, renewed or retired, their cost plus removal or disposal costs, less salvage proceeds, is charged to accumulated depreciation.

For non-utility property, plant and equipment, depreciation is calculated by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of depreciable assets. Cost and accumulated depreciation for non-utility property, plant and equipment retired or disposed of are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the absence of a set rate, by waterearnings.

In addition to third party costs, direct personnel costs and wastewater treatment industry standard.indirect construction overhead costs may be capitalized. Interest incurred during the construction period is also capitalized as a component of the cost of the constructed assets.assets, which represents the cost of debt associated with construction activity. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense. The cost of replacements and improvements is capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost is eliminated from the accounts, and is charged to the related accumulated depreciation.

Revenue RecognitionWater Services—Water usageservices revenues are recorded when service is rendered or water is delivered to customers. However, in addition to the monthly basic service charge, the determination and billing of water sales to individual customers is based on the reading of their meters, which occurs on a systematic basis throughout the month. At the end of each reporting period, amounts of water delivered to customers since the date of the last meter reading are estimated and the corresponding accrued, utilitybut unbilled revenue is recorded.

Water meter connection fees are the fees associated with the application process to set up a customer to receive utility service on an existing water meter. These fees are approved by the ACC through the regulatory process and are set based on the costs incurred to establish services including the application process, billing setup, initial meter reading and service transfer. Because the amounts charged for water connection fees are set by our regulator and not negotiated in conjunction with the pricing of ongoing water service, the connection fees represent the culmination of a separate earnings process and are recognized when the service is provided.

Meter installation fees are the fees charged to developers or builders associated with installing new water meters. Certain fees for meters are regulated by the ACC, and are refundable pursuant to the end customer over a period of time. Refundable meter installation fees are recorded as a liability upon receipt. Other certain meter fees are negotiated directly with developers or builders and are not subject to ACC regulation and represent the culmination of a separate earnings process. These fees are recognized as revenue when the service is rendered, for new customer connections. Revenue fromor when a water meter sales that is not refundable pursuant to an advance in aid of construction agreement with the developer are generally recognized at the time the water meters are installed and service begins to a particular lot.

installed.

Revenue RecognitionWastewater and Recycled Water Services—Wastewater service revenues are generally recognized when service is rendered. Wastewater services are billed at a fixed monthly amount per connection, and recycled water services are billed monthly based on volumetric fees.


F-10


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Revenue RecognitionUnregulated Revenues—Unregulated Revenues represent those revenues that are not subject to the ratemaking process of the ACC. Unregulated revenues are limited to rental revenue and imputed revenues resulting from certain ICFA arrangements.

-F-9-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—Provisions are made for doubtful accounts due to the inherent uncertainty around the collectability of accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded as bad debt expense, and is classified as general and administrative expense. The allowance for doubtful accounts is determined considering the age of the receivable balance, type of customer (e.g., residential, commercial), payment history as well as specific identification of any known or expected collectability issues (see Note 5).

Infrastructure Coordinationcoordination and Financing Feesfinancing feesGWR finances the capital improvement obligations of its subsidiaries with a combination of equity and debt. The Company has infrastructureInfrastructure coordination and financing agreements (ICFAs)(“ICFAs”) are agreements with developers and homebuilders whereby GWRI, which owns the operating utilities, provides services to plan, coordinate and finance the water and wastewater infrastructure that would otherwise be required to their respective land parcels on abe performed or subcontracted by the developer or homebuilder. Services provided within these agreements include coordination of construction services for water and wastewater treatment facilities as well as financing, arranging and coordinating the provision of utility services.

ICFA revenue is recognized when the following conditions are met:

The fee per lot basis. ICFAsis fixed and determinable

The cash received is nonrefundable

Capacity currently exists to serve the specific lots

There are voluntary, alternative financing mechanisms the Company periodically employs to allowno additional significant performance obligations

As these arrangements are with developers and homebuildersnot with the end water or wastewater customer, revenue recognition coincides with the completion of our performance obligations under the agreement with the developer and our ability to defer financial participation in the up-front investment in infrastructure. Revenue from these infrastructure agreements is recognized at the timeprovide fitted capacity for water meters are installed and service begins to a particular lot. Cashwastewater service. Payments received under the agreements prior to the commencement of water service is nonrefundable and isare recorded as deferred revenue inuntil the combined consolidated balance sheets.

point at which all of the conditions described above are met. Historically ICFAs have been accounted for as revenue pursuant to the obligations being met as outlined above, or as CIAC when funds were received. Pursuant to Rate Decision no. 74364, approximately 70% of ICFAs are now recorded as a hook-up fee (“HUF”), with 30% recorded as revenue once all components of revenue recognition are met (See Note 3).

Cash and Cash Equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments in debt instruments with an original maturity of three months or less. Book overdrafts of $3,028,831 and $4,141,031 at December 31, 2007 and 2006 respectively, are included in accounts payable in the combined consolidated balance sheets. These amounts represent outstanding checks that have not been presented to the bank for payment. Upon presentment, the Company will access the Company’s line of credit to fund the cash account.

Restricted Cash—Restricted cash represents cash deposited as a debt service reserve for certain loans and bondsbonds. The following table summarizes the restricted cash balance as of the Company. The deposits must stay in place until the loans have been fully repaid.

December 31, 2014 (in thousands of US$):

   12/31/2014 

Bond Reserve

  $9,823  

Certificate of Deposits

   104  
  

 

 

 
  $9,927  
  

 

 

 

Income TaxesGWR and GWM are limited liability companies and have elected to be treated as partnerships for income tax purposes. Accordingly, elements of income and expense flow through and are taxed to the members on an individual basis; therefore, a provision or liability for income taxes for these entities is not included in the combined consolidated financial statements. Through December 31, 2005, Santa Cruz and Palo Verde were also organized as limited liability companies and were treated as partnerships for income tax purposes. Effective January 1, 2006, the assets and activities of Santa Cruz and Palo Verde were transferred to new taxable corporations which are subsidiaries of GWI.

The provision for income taxes in the combined consolidated financial statements relates to GWI and its taxable incorporated subsidiaries. For such taxable entities, the Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. There was noThe Company’s valuation allowance recordedtotaled $8,500 as of December 31, 2007 and 2006.
In June 2006, the2014 (see Note 11).

-F-10-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of FASB No. 109,” (“FIN 48”). This interpretation, among other things, createsStatements

We evaluate uncertain tax positions using a two-step approach for evaluating uncertain tax positions.approach. Recognition (step one) occurs when an enterprise concludeswe conclude that a tax position, based solely on its technical merits, is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination. Measurement (step two) determines the amount of benefit that more-likely-than-not will be realized upon settlement. Derecognition of a tax position that was previously recognized would occur when a companywe subsequently determinesdetermine that a tax position no longer meets the more-likely-than-not threshold of being sustained. FIN 48 specifically prohibits theThe use of a valuation allowance as a substitute for derecognition of tax positions is prohibited, and itto the extent that uncertain tax positions exist, we provide expanded disclosures.

Basic and Diluted Earnings per Common Share—The Company has expanded disclosure requirements. Adoption431 options outstanding to acquire an equivalent number of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.


F-11


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Deferred Acquisition Costsshares of GWRI common stock. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006,2014, these options are out of the money. Therefore, the Company had deferred certain legal and other costs directly relateddoes not have any common share equivalents to ongoing acquisitions that will be allocatedconsidered for purposes of calculating earnings per share. See Note 12. Any changes in the weighted average common shares relate only to the net assetsbuy-back of the acquired entities or written off for unconsummated acquisitions.
shares. See Note 15.

Advances and Contributions in Aid of ConstructionGoodwillGWR’s regulated utility subsidiaries have various agreements with real estate development and homebuilding companies (the “Developers”), whereby funds, water line extensions, and wastewater line extensions are provided to the companies by the Developers and are considered refundable advances for construction. These advances in aid of construction are non interest-bearing and are subject to refund to the Developers through annual payments that are computed as a percentage of the total annual gross revenue earned from customers connected to utility services constructed under the agreement over a specified period. Upon the expiration of the agreements, the remaining balance of the advance becomes nonrefundable and at that time is considered a contribution in aid of construction. Contributions in aid of construction are amortized as a reduction of depreciation expense over the estimated remaining life of the related utility plant.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets—Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired in business combinations. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually on October 1 and more frequently if circumstances indicate that it may be impaired. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level. The goodwill impairment model is a two-step process. First, it requires a comparison of the book value of net assets to the fair value of the related operations that have goodwill assigned to them. We use the terminal valuation method in estimating fair value which assumes a business will be sold at the end of the projection period at a specific terminal value. Earnings and discounted cash flows were developed from our internal forecasts. Additionally, management must make an estimate of a weighted-average cost of capital to be used as a company-specific discount rate, which takes into account certain risk and size premiums, risk-free yields, and the capital structure of the industry. We have also considered other qualitative and quantitative factors including the regulatory environment that can significantly impact future earnings and cash flows and the effects of the volatile current economic environment. Changes in these projections or estimates could result in a reporting unit either passing or failing the first step in the goodwill impairment model.

If the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be less than book value, a second step is performed to determine if goodwill is impaired, and if so, the amount of such impairment. In this process, an implied fair value for goodwill is estimated by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to the applicable reporting unit’s assets and liabilities resulting in any excess fair value representing the implied fair value of goodwill. The amount by which carrying value exceeds the implied fair value represents the amount of goodwill impairment (see Note 7).

Intangible AssetsIntangible assets not subject to amortization consist of certain permits expected to be renewable indefinitely, water rights and certain service areas acquired in transactions which did not meet the definition of business combinations for accounting purposes, and are considered to have indefinite lives. Goodwill and intangibleIntangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but are tested for impairment annually, or more often if certain circumstances indicate a possible impairment may exist. OtherAmortized intangible assets consist primarily of acquired ICFA contract rights,rights.

Pursuant to Rate Decision No. 71878 issued by the ACC on September 15, 2010 for the February 2009 filed rate cases for Santa Cruz, Palo Verde, Valencia, Greater Buckeye, Greater Tonopah and Willow Valley (the “2010 Regulatory Rate Decision”), ICFA funds received were accounted for as CIAC. The Company established a regulatory liability against the Company’s intangible assets balance to offset the value of the intangible assets related to the expected receipt of ICFA fees in the future. As of December 31, 2013 the Company had a regulatory liability balance of $11.4 million. However, in 2014, in conjunction with Rate Decision No. 74364, the ACC determined that ICFA funds were no longer to be recorded as CIAC, but rather approximately 70% of funds received should be recorded as HUF, with the remaining 30% to be

-F-11-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

deferred and recognized according to the Company’s ICFA revenue recognition policy (see Note 3). Accordingly, in 2014 30%, or $3.4 million, of the regulatory liability was reversed in connection with the recognition of the rate decision.

Debt Issuance Costs—In connection with the issuance of some of our long-term debt, we have incurred legal and other costs that we believe are beingdirectly attributable to realizing the proceeds of the debt issued. These costs are capitalized in other assets and amortized as interest expense using the effective interest method over the contract terms proportionatelyterm of the respective debt. Amortization of debt issuance costs and discounts totaled $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, of which $696,000 was for the write off of debt issuance costs and $327,000 was for the current year amortization related to the related revenues.

Series 2012A and 2012B bonds and the Regions Term loan, which were retired in 2014.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets—Management evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. If an indicator of possible impairment exists, an undiscounted cash flow analysis would be prepared to determine whether there is an actual impairment. Measurement of the impairment loss is based on the fair value of the asset. Generally, fair value will be determined using appraisals or valuation techniques such as the present value of expected future cash flows.

Advances and Contributions in Aid of Construction—The Company has various agreements with Developers and builders, whereby funds, water line extensions, or wastewater line extensions are provided to us by the Developers and are considered refundable advances for construction. These advances in aid of construction (“AIAC”) arenon-interest-bearing and are subject to refund to the Developers through annual payments that are computed as a percentage of the total annual gross revenue earned from customers connected to utility services constructed under the agreement over a specified period. Upon the expiration of the agreements’ refunding period, the remaining balance of the advance becomes nonrefundable and at that time is considered contributions in aid of construction (“CIAC”). CIAC are amortized as a reduction of depreciation expense over the estimated remaining life of the related utility plant. For rate-making purposes, utility plant funded by advances and contributions in aid of construction are excluded from rate base. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company transferred $7.4 million of AIAC balances to CIAC for amounts for which the refunding period had expired.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments—The carrying values of cash equivalents, trade receivables, and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. See Note 910 for information as to the fair value of the Company’sour long-term debt. The Company’sOur refundable advances in aid of constructionAIAC have a carrying value of $69,405,414 and $51,063,891$89.2 million at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.2014. Portions of these noninterest-bearingnon-interest-bearing instruments are payable annually through 20302032 and amounts not paid by the contract expiration dates become nonrefundable. Their relative fair values cannot be accurately estimated because future refund payments depend on several variables, including new customer connections, customer consumption levels, and future rate increases. However, the fair value of these amounts would be less than their carrying value due to the noninterest-bearingnon-interest-bearing feature.

StoredAsset Retirement Obligations—Liabilities for asset retirement obligations are typically recorded at fair value in the period in which they are incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes a cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement. Our legal obligations for retirement reflect principally the retirement of wastewater treatment facilities, which are required to be closed in accordance with the Clean Closure Requirements of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ). The Clean Closure Requirements of ADEQ for wastewater facilities are driven by a need to protect the environment from inadvertent contamination associated with the decommissioning of these systems. As such, our

-F-12-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

regulated subsidiaries incur asset retirement obligations. We have provided $229,000 of certificates of deposit or letters of credit to benefit ADEQ for such anticipated closure costs. Water Credits—Stored water creditssystems, unlike wastewater systems, do not require Aquifer Protection Permits or the associated Clean Closure Requirement obligation.

Amounts recorded for asset retirement obligations are accounted forsubject to various assumptions and determinations, such as inventorydetermining whether a legal obligation exists to remove assets; estimating the fair value of the costs of removal; estimating when final removal will occur; and determining thecredit-adjusted, risk-free interest rates to be utilized on discounting future liabilities. Changes that may arise over time with regard to these assumptions will change amounts recorded in the future. Estimating the fair value of the costs of removal were determined based on third-party costs.

Segments—Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing operating performance. In consideration of ASC 280—Segment Reporting the Company notes it is not organized around specific products and services, geographic regions or regulatory environments. The Company currently operates in one geographic region within the State of Arizona, wherein each operating utility operates within the same regulatory environment.

While the Company reports its revenue, disaggregated by service type, on the face of its Statements of Operations, the Company does not manage the business based on any performance measure at the cost incurredindividual revenue stream level. The Company does not have any customers that contribute more than 10% to takethe Company’s revenues or revenue streams. Additionally we note that the CODM uses consolidated financial information to evaluate the Company’s performance, which is the same basis on which he communicates the Company’s results and performance to the Board of Directors. It is upon this consolidated basis from which he bases all significant decisions regarding the allocation of the Company’s resources on a consolidated level. Based on the information described above and in accordance with the applicable literature, management has concluded that the Company is currently organized and operated as one operating and reportable segment.

2.NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Auditing Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-08,Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which change the criteria for reporting discontinued operations and changing the disclosures for disposals that meet the definition under the new guidance. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in a company’s strategy would be deemed a discontinued operation. To meet the definition of strategic shift, the disposal should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results. Certain examples of the type of disposals that would qualify as a discontinued operation include a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business, or a major equity method investment. For those disposals that meet the criteria, expanded disclosures on assets, liabilities, income and expenses would apply. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2014-08 in the first quarter of 2015 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which completes the joint effort between the FASB and IASB to converge the recognition of revenue between the two boards. The new standard affects any entity using U.S. GAAP that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets not included within other FASB standards. The guiding principal of the new standard is that an entity should recognize revenue in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for the delivery of

-F-13-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

goods and store waterservices. ASU 2014-09 may be adopted using either of two acceptable methods: (1) retrospective adoption to each prior period presented with the option to elect certain practical expedients; or (2) adoption with the cumulative effect recognized at the date of initial application and providing certain disclosures. To assess at which time revenue should be recognized, an entity should use the following steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in connection withthe contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when, or as, the entity satisfies a performance obligation. For public business entities, ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within the reporting period. For private companies, ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Earlier application allowed in certain recharge permits (see Note 3.)

Future Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncementscircumstances. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this guidance may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006,August 2014, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,ASU 2014-15,Fair Value MeasurementsDisclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157, which defines fair value, establishesmanagement’s responsibility in evaluating whether there is substantial doubt about an organizations ability to continue as a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accountinggoing concern. The new standard provides that an entity’s management should evaluate whether conditions or events exist that would raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. If substantial doubt exists, the guidance provides principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157definitions to assist management in assessing the appropriate timing and content in their financial statement disclosures. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2014-15 is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03,Interest—Imputation of Interest: Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the associated debt liability, consistent with the accounting of debt discounts. The effects of this update are to be applied retrospectively as a change in accounting principal. For public business entities, ASU 2015-03 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after NovemberDecember 15, 2007,2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. In February 2008,For all other entities, the FASBamendments are effective for financial statements issued a staff position delaying the effective date of certain non-financial assets and liabilities tofor fiscal periodsyears beginning after NovemberDecember 15, 2008.2015, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-03 will require the Company to reclassify debt issuance costs retrospectively beginning January 1, 2016. The Company is currently reviewingassessing the effect of SFAS No. 157, if any,


F-12


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
impact that this guidance may have on its combinedour consolidated financial statements; however, it is not expected to have a material impact on its combined results. The Company currently does not believe that SFAS 157 will have a material impact on its financial statements
statements.

In February 2007,November 2015, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,ASU 2015-17,Income Taxes: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in the classified statement of financial position. The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 allows entities to choose to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earningspurpose of each subsequent reporting date. The fair value election is available for most financial assets and liabilities on aninstrument-by-instrument basis andthis update is to be elected onsimplify the datepresentation of the financial instrument is initially recognized. SFAS No. 159deferred liabilities and assets. For public business entities, ASU 2015-17 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. For private companies, the ASU is effective for financial statements for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of aan interim or annual reporting entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007 (with earlier application permitted under certain circumstances).period. The Company did not chooseis currently assessing the impact this guidance may have on our consolidated financial statements.

3.REGULATORY DECISION AND RELATED ACCOUNTING AND POLICY CHANGES

Our regulated utilities and certain other balances are subject to take the fair value election allowedregulation by the standard.

ACC and meet the requirements for regulatory accounting found within ASC Topic 980.

In December 2007,accordance with ASC Topic 980, rates charged to utility customers are intended to recover the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141(R) replaces SFAS No. 141 and, although it retains certain requirementscosts of that guidance, it is broader in scope. SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirementsthe provision of service plus a reasonable return in the recognitionsame period. Initial rates are set by the ACC at the

-F-14-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

time the CC&N is established for an area. The initial rates are determined based on an application submitted by us that includes anticipated customer counts and measurementrequired infrastructure with rates set to achieve a rate of return on equity invested in the utility. Changes in rates, if any, are made through further formal rate applications.

On July 11, 2012, we filed rate applications with the ACC to adjust the revenue requirements for seven utilities representing a collective rate increase of approximately 28% over 2011’s revenue. In August 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with ACC Staff, the Residential Utility Consumers Office, the City of Maricopa, and other parties to the rate case. The settlement required approval by the ACC’s Commissioners before it could take effect. In February 2014, the rate case proceedings were completed and the ACC issued Rate Decision No. 74364, effectively approving the settlement agreement. The rulings of the assets acquired,decision include, but are not limited to, the liabilitiesfollowing:

For the Company’s utilities, a collective revenue requirement increase of $4.3 million based on 2011 test year service connections, phased-in over time, with the first increase in January 2015 as follows (in thousands of US$):

   Incremental   Cumulative 

2015

  $1,416    $1,416  

2016

   1,219     2,635  

2017

   335     2,970  

2018

   336     3,306  

2019

   335     3,641  

2020

   335     3,976  

2021

   335     4,311  

Whereas this phase-in of additional revenues was determined using a 2011 test year, to the extent that the number of active service connections increases from 2011 levels, the additional revenues may be greater than the amounts set forth above.

Full reversal of the imputation of CIAC balances associated with funds previously received under ICFAs, as required in the Company’s last rate case. The reversal restores rate base or future rate base, and has a significant impact of restoring shareholder equity on the balance sheet.

The Company has agreed to not enter into any new ICFAs. Existing ICFAs will remain in place, but a portion of future payments to be received under the ICFAs will be considered as hook-up fees, which are accounted for as CIAC once expended on plant.

A 9.5% return on common equity will be adopted.

None of the Company’s utilities will file another rate application before May 31, 2016. GWRI’s subsidiaries, Santa Cruz Water Company (“Santa Cruz”) and Palo Verde Utilities Company (“Palo Verde”) may not file for another rate increase before May 31, 2017.

The following provides additional discussion on accounting and policy changes resulting from Rate Decision No. 74364.

Infrastructure Coordination and Financing Agreements—ICFAs are agreements with developers and homebuilders whereby the GWRI parent company, which owns the operating utilities, provides services to plan, coordinate and finance the water and wastewater infrastructure that would otherwise be required to be performed or subcontracted by the developer or homebuilder.

Under the ICFAs, GWRI has a contractual obligation to ensure physical capacity exists through its regulated utilities for water and wastewater to the landowner/developer when needed. This obligation persists regardless of connection growth. Fees for these services are typically a negotiated amount per equivalent

-F-15-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

dwelling unit for the specified development or portion of land. Payments are generally due in installments, with a portion due upon signing of the agreement, a portion due upon completion of certain milestones, and the final payment due upon final plat approval or sale of the subdivision. The payments are non-refundable. The agreements are generally recorded as a lien against the land and must be assumed in the event of a sale or transfer. The regional planning and any non-controlling interestscoordination of the infrastructure in the various service areas has been an important part of GWRI’s business model.

Prior to January 1, 2010, GWRI accounted for funds received under ICFAs as revenue once the obligations specified in the ICFA were met. As these arrangements are with developers and not with the end water or wastewater customer, the timing of revenue recognition coincided with the completion of GWRI’s performance obligations under the agreement with the developer and with GWRI’s ability to provide fitted capacity for water and wastewater service through its regulated subsidiaries.

The 2010 Regulatory Rate Decision established new rates for the recovery of reasonable costs incurred by the utilities and a return on invested capital. In determining the new annual revenue requirement, the ACC imputed a reduction to rate base for all amounts related to ICFA funds collected by the Company that the ACC deemed to beContributions in Aid of Construction (“CIAC”) for rate making purposes. As a business combination. Among other requirements, direct acquisition costsresult of the decision by the ACC, GWRI changed its accounting policy for the accounting of ICFA funds. Effective January 1, 2010, GWRI recorded ICFA funds received as CIAC. Thereafter, the ICFA-related CIAC was amortized as a reduction of depreciation expense over the estimated depreciable life of the utility plant at the related utilities.

With the issuance of Rate Decision No. 74364, in February 2014, the ACC changed how ICFA funds would be characterized and acquisition-related restructuring costs mustaccounted for going forward. Most notably, ICFA funds would no longer be CIAC. ICFA funds which were already received or which had become due prior to the date of Rate Decision No. 74364 would be accounted for separately fromin accordance with the business combination. In addition, SFASCompany’s ICFA revenue recognition policy that had been in place prior to the 2010 Regulatory Rate Decision. For ICFA funds to be received in the future, Rate Decision No. 141(R) provides guidance in accounting for step acquisitions, contingent liabilities, goodwill, contingent consideration, and other aspects74364 prescribes that 70% of business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectivelyICFA funds to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Accordingly,be received by the Company will adopt SFASbe recorded in the associated utility subsidiary as a HUF liability, with the remaining 30% to be recorded as deferred revenue, to be accounted for in accordance with the Company’s ICFA revenue recognition policy. In relation to the change in accounting brought about by Rate Decision No. 141(R)74364, the Company recognized a gain on regulatory order of $50.7 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.

The Company intends to account for the portion allocated to the HUF as a contribution, similar to CIAC. However, from the regulator’s perspective, the HUF is not technically CIAC and does not impact rate base until the related funds are expended. Such funds will be segregated in a separate bank account and used for plant. A HUF liability will be established and will be relieved once the HUF funds are utilized for the construction of plant. For facilities required under a HUF or ICFA, the utilities must first use the HUF moneys received, after which, it may use debt or equity financing for the remainder of construction. The Company will record the 30% as deferred revenue, which is to be recognized as revenue once the obligations specified within the ICFA are met. As of December 31, 2014, ICFA deferred revenue recorded on the consolidated balance sheet totaled $19.7 million, which represents deferred revenue recorded for ICFA funds received on contracts that had become due prior to Rate Decision No. 74364. For ICFA contracts coming due after Rate Decision No. 74364, 30% will be added to this balance with the remaining 70% recorded to a HUF liability.

Regulatory asset—Under ASC Topic 980, rate regulated entities defer costs and credits on the balance sheet as regulatory assets and liabilities when it is probable that these costs and credits will be recognized in the rate making process in a period different from the period in which they would have been reflected in income by an unregulated company. Certain costs associated with our rate cases have been deferred on our balance sheet as regulatory assets as approved by the ACC. At December 31, 2014, the Company has one

-F-16-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

regulatory asset in the amount of $400,000 related to costs incurred in connection with our most recent rate case. This amount will be amortized over a three-year period beginning January 2015, which period is aligned with the phase-in of the new rates provided by Rate Decision No. 74364.

Intangible assets / Regulatory liability—The Company had previously recorded certain intangible assets related to ICFA contracts obtained in connection with our Santa Cruz, Palo Verde and Sonoran Utility Services (“Sonoran”) acquisitions. The intangible assets represented the benefits to be received over time by virtue of having those contracts. Prior to January 1, 20092010, the ICFA-related intangibles were amortized when ICFA funds were recognized as revenue. Effective January 1, 2010, in connection with the 2010 Regulatory Rate Decision, these assets became fully offset by a regulatory liability of $11.2 million since the imputation of ICFA funds as CIAC effectively resulted in the Company not being able to benefit (through rates) from the acquired ICFA contracts.

Effective January 1, 2010, the gross ICFAs intangibles began to be amortized when cash was received in proportion to the amount of total cash expected to be received under the underlying agreements. However, such amortization expense was offset by a corresponding reduction of the regulatory liability in the same amount.

As a result of Rate Decision No. 74364, the Company changed its policy around the ICFA related intangible assets. As discussed above, pursuant to Rate Decision No. 74364, approximately 70% of ICFA funds to be received in the future will be recorded as a HUF at the Company’s applicable utility subsidiary. The remaining approximate 30% of future ICFA funds will be recorded at the parent company level and will applybe subject to the Company’s ICFA revenue recognition accounting policy. Since the Company now expects to experience an economic benefit from the 30% portion of future ICFA funds, 30% of the regulatory liability, or $3.4 million, was reversed during the three months ended March 31, 2014. The remaining 70% of the regulatory liability, or $7.9 million, will continue to be recorded on the balance sheet. At December 31, 2014, this is the Company’s sole regulatory liability.

Subsequent to Rate Decision No. 74364, the intangible assets will continue to amortize when the corresponding ICFA funds are received in proportion to the amount of total cash expected to be received under the underlying agreements. The recognition of amortization expense will be partially offset by a corresponding reduction of the regulatory liability.

Income taxes—As a result of the additional revenues expected to be provided by Rate Decision No. 74364, as well as other factors, the Company performed an evaluation of its provisions prospectively.

deferred income taxes and determined that sufficient evidence now exists that the majority of the Company’s net deferred tax assets will be utilized in the future. Accordingly in 2014, the Company reversed substantially all of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance previously recorded (see Note 11).

-F-17-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

4.
2. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment at December 31, 2007 and 20062014 consist of the following:

           
  2007  2006  Depreciation Rate
 
Utility plant and equipment:
Mains/lines—sewers
 $101,825,890  $67,696,120  2% - 5%
Plant  56,539,545   37,093,946  2 - 10
Equipment  32,371,801   17,670,363  3 - 20
Meters  4,631,086   4,775,382  5 - 8
Land  409,866   979,428   
Constructionwork-in-process
  43,991,015   49,711,512   
           
Utility plant and equipment  239,769,203   177,926,751   
Office equipment/furniture  2,206,764   1,403,488  14 - 20
           
Total property, plant and equipment  241,975,967   179,330,239   
Less accumulated depreciation  (11,744,158)  (6,581,502)  
           
Net property, plant and equipment $230,231,809  $172,748,737   
           


F-13

following (in thousands of US$):


   December 31,
2014
   Average
Depreciation Life
(in years)

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:

    

Mains/lines/sewers

  $138,116    47

Plant

   79,983    25

Equipment

   44,286    10

Meters

   6,336    12

Furniture, fixture and leasehold improvements

   430    8

Computer and office equipment

   1,006    5

Software

   163    3

Land and land rights

   986    

Other

   139    

Construction work-in-process

   47,550    
  

 

 

   

Total property, plant and equipment

   318,995    

Less accumulated depreciation

   (78,571  
  

 

 

   

Net property, plant and equipment

  $240,424    
  

 

 

   

GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
5.
3. OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETSACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Other intangible assets at December 31, 2007 and 2006 consist of the following:
                         
  2007  2006 
  Gross
  Accumulated
  Net
  Gross
  Accumulated
  Net
 
  Amount  Amortization  Amount  Amount  Amortization  Amount 
 
Unamortized intangible assets:                        
Hassayampa recharge permits $6,435,531      $6,435,531  $6,435,531      $6,435,531 
Water rights            515,158       515,158 
Francisco Grande and CP CC&N service area  9,052,890       9,052,890   9,042,027       9,042,027 
                         
Total unamortized intangible assets  15,488,421       15,488,421   15,992,716       15,992,716 
Amortized intangible assets:                        
Acquired ICFAs  17,977,890  $(6,179,210)  11,798,680   17,977,890  $(3,974,050)  14,003,840 
Sonoran contract rights  7,406,297   (1,070,363)  6,335,934   7,406,297   (759,660)  6,646,637 
                         
Total amortized intangible assets  25,384,187   (7,249,573)  18,134,614   25,384,187   (4,733,710)  20,650,477 
                         
Total other intangible assets $40,872,608  $(7,249,573) $33,623,035  $41,376,903  $(4,733,710) $36,643,193 
                         
Estimated annual amortization expense through 2012 and thereafter is as follows:
     
2008 $8,852,040 
2009  3,440,910 
2010  881,440 
2011  367,760 
2012  363,150 
Thereafter  4,229,314 
     
Total $18,134,614 
4. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable at December 31, 2007 and 20062014 consist of the following:

         
  2007  2006 
 
Billed utility revenue $2,205,745  $2,150,194 
Other  4,455   29,108 
         
   2,210,200   2,179,302 
Less allowance for doubtful accounts  (226,443)  (233,525)
         
Accounts receivable, net $1,983,757  $1,945,777 


F-14

following (in thousands of US$):


   December 31, 2014 

Billed receivables

  $1,523  

Less allowance for doubtful accounts

   (158
  

 

 

 

Accounts receivable—net

  $1,365  
  

 

 

 

GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts:
             
  2007  2006  2005 
 
Balance at January 1,  $233,525  $182,733  $138,060 
Amounts charged to expense  366,611   62,947   44,890 
Accounts written off  (373,693)  (12,155)  (217)
             
Balance at December 31,  $226,443  $233,525  $182,733 
accounts activity as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 (in thousands of US$):

   December 31, 2014 

Beginning balance December 31, 2013

  $(102

Allowance additions

   (92

Write-offs

   57  

Recoveries

   (21
  

 

 

 

Ending balance December 31, 2014

  $(158
  

 

 

 

6.
5. ACQUISITIONSEQUITY METHOD INVESTMENT AND CONVERTIBLE NOTE

On December 30, 2006, GWI purchasedJune 5, 2013, the total issuedCompany sold GWM a wholly-owned subsidiary of GWRI that owned and outstanding shares of FG, an Arizona corporation owningoperated the right to provide water and wastewater services near the cities of Maricopa and Casa Grande, Arizona, for $8,000,000. Also, on December 30, 2006, GWI purchased the total issued and outstanding shares of CP, an Arizona corporation providing water services near the cities of Maricopa and Casa Grande, AZ from CHI ConstructionFATHOM business (“CHI”FATHOM”) for $1,250,000. Contemporaneously. In connection with the two acquisitions,sale of GWM, the Company entered intomade an ICFA with CHI for Legends Ranch, a 7,000-acre master planned community owned by CHI. The majority of the 7,000 acres wereinvestment in the utility service areas of CP and FG, and CHI agreed to prepay a portion of its ICFA fees in order to partially finance the utility acquisitions. The purchase consideration of $1,250,000FATHOM Partnership. This limited partnership investment is accounted for CP will be paid by way of future reductions of the ICFA fee of $250 per lot for lots 2,001 through 7,000, and has been recorded at its estimated fair value of $934,225. For the purchase price of FG, CHI has placed a letter of credit in escrow of $4,800,000, representing its ICFA fee prepayment, and the Company has placed a letter of credit in escrow of $3,200,000 (see Note 9). The letters of credit will be converted to cash once the Commission approves the transfer of the service area to GW-SC and GW-PV, which is expected to occur in 2008. The ICFA fees prepaid by CHI will be reimbursed by way of reducing the ICFA fee $750 per lot for lots 2,001 through 8,400. The total purchase price of the CP and FG shares has been allocated to the respective service areas acquired, which are considered to be indefinite life intangible assets. Legends Ranch was sold in 2007 and the buyer has assumed CHI’s rights and obligations under the agreements.

On July 11, 2006, GWI purchased the total issued and outstanding shares of WMCequity method due to our investment being considered more than minor.

The original investment in order to obtain utilities and service areas in the western portion of Maricopa County, Arizona . The purchase priceFATHOM consisted of an initial paymentinvestment of $18.5 million, of which $6.2 million was funded by the prepayment of ICFA fees by developers seeking service from Greater Tonopah and Hassayampa, and additional noninterest-bearing purchase consideration totaling $41.5 million with the first payment due to be paid July 11, 2007,$750,000 in the amountSeries A preferred units and $98,000 of $5 million. The balance due is payable in the form of future growth premiums, which have the potential to accelerate the payment schedule; however, the growth premium will not be less than $6 million in each of the years 2008 through 2011 and $12.5 million in 2012. The growth premiums are payable on March 31, 2008, and on March 31 of each year thereafter through 2012, in an amount equal to $3,000 for each new meter connected during the previous calendar year, except for the payment due in 2008 which will be based on the meters installed from July 12, 2006 through December 31, 2007, until the date on which the cumulative growth premium equals $36,500,000. The future purchase consideration was recorded at its fair value of $30,976,000, based on an imputed interest rate of 8.5% based on the Company’s weighted average cost of capital and the minimum payment amounts set forth above, resultingcommon units. Additionally, GWRI invested $750,000 in a total purchase price of $46,672,081, net of $2,803,919 cash acquired.

10% convertible promissory


F-15

-F-18-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The total purchase priceINC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

note of WMC was allocated among tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets, goodwill and assumable liabilities at their fair value as at the acquisition date of July 11, 2006 as follows:

Utility plant in service$18,002,601
Current assets (including cash of $2,803,919)3,609,377
Goodwill (not deductible for tax purposes)45,809,111
Intangible asset — Hassayampa recharge permits6,435,531
Current liabilities(1,003,533)
Deferred tax liability(3,225,968)
Advances in aid of construction(17,612,715)
Contributions in aid of construction(846,202)
Assumed debt(1,692,202)
Net assets acquired$49,476,000
On June 15, 2005, the Company completed the purchase of the assets of Sonoran. The effective purchase date was March 31, 2005. As part of the purchase, the Company acquired rights under certain ICFAsGWM with landowners within the designated service area. The purchase price consisted of an initial payment of $7.2 million, additional purchase consideration totaling $10.5 million payable as a defined number of homes are sold in the designated service area, and contingent consideration of $300-$500 per meter installed for a period not to exceed 18 years from the initial payment date in a portion of the service area. The initial payment is payable upon approval by the Commission of the necessary expansion of the GW-SC and GW-PV CC&Ns to include the Sonoran service area. Such expansion has been preliminarily approved by the Commission pending the dissolution of the unregulated water and wastewater improvement district, and the Company expects to make the initial payment in 2009. The additional purchase consideration is contingently payable as follows: $2.5 million upon the sale of 2,500 homes, $3.75 million upon the sale of an additional 2,500 homes, and $4.25 million upon the sale of an additional 5,000 homes. Irrespective of these milestones, any unpaid portion of the first $10 million of additional consideration is payable in full upon the 10th anniversary of the initial payment date. Asoriginal maturity of December 31, 2007, there have been 4,946 homes sold.
The Company has recognized a purchase liability consisting2014. In May 2014, the maturity date of the initial payment and,note was extended to June 30, 2015. We accounted for this investment in accordance with FASB Statement No. 141,Business Combinations,relevant accounting guidance for debt and equity securities which requires the portionfair value measurement of the contingent consideration (approximately $10 million) necessaryinvestment pursuant to cause the allocated cost of the acquired entity to equal theASC Topic 820,Fair Value Measurement. The fair value of the net assets acquired. Wheninvestment in the contingencies are resolved, any excessconvertible notes at initial recognition was determined using the transaction price, of which the price paid by the Company was consistent with the price paid by third party investors for comparable convertible notes.

In November 2014, FATHOM experienced a qualified financing event (qualified financing was defined as an equity financing by FATHOM Partnership in which FATHOM Partnership sells its units for at least $1.75 per unit and the aggregate proceeds from such financing was at least $15 million, exclusive of convertible note amounts converted). At the time of the consideration paid overqualified financing, the convertible promissory note was converted into Series B Preferred Units, and accounted for under the equity method. The Company’s resulting ownership of common and preferred units represented an approximate 8.0% ownership (on a fully diluted basis).

In conjunction with the qualified financing, our equity interest in the Series A and Series B preferred shares was adjusted in accordance with ASC 323, wherein we recorded a gain of $1.0 million. The adjustment to the carrying value of our investments was calculated using our proportionate share of FATHOM’s adjusted net equity. The gain was recorded within other income and expense in our consolidated statement of operations.

At December 31, 2014, the carrying value of our equity investment was $1.2 million. The carrying value of our investment is a reflection of our initial liability recorded willinvestment, the adjustment related to the qualified financing and our proportionate share of FATHOM’s cumulative losses.

We evaluate our investment in FATHOM Partnership/GWM for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our investment may have experienced an “other-than-temporary” decline in value. Since the sale of GWM, the losses incurred on the investment were greater than anticipated; however, based upon our evaluation of various relevant factors, including the recent equity event, the ability of FATHOM to achieve and sustain an earnings capacity that would justify the carrying amount of our investment, as of December 31, 2014 we do not believe the investment to be impaired.

We have evaluated whether GWM qualifies as a variable interest entity (“VIE”) pursuant to the accounting guidance of ASC 810,Consolidations. Considering the potential that the total equity investment in FATHOM Partnership/GWM may not be sufficient to absorb the losses of FATHOM, we believe it is currently appropriate to view GWM as a VIE. However, considering GWRI’s minority interest and limited involvement with the FATHOM business, the Company would not be required to consolidate the financial statements of GWM. Rather, we have accounted for our investment under the equity method.

7.GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The carrying value of goodwill totaled $13.1 million as of December 31, 2014, which included balances of $12.7 million and $398,000 in the Valencia and Willow Valley reporting units, respectively. No impairments were recognized as additional costduring the year ended December 31, 2014.

-F-19-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Intangible assets at December 31, 2014 consisted of the acquisition.

The recognized costfollowing (in thousands of theUS$):

   December 31, 2014 
   Gross
Amount
   Accumulated
Amortization
   Net
Amount
 

INDEFINITE LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS:

      

CP Water CC&N service area

  $1,532    $—      $1,532  

Intangible trademark

   13     —       13  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   1,545     —       1,545  

AMORTIZED INTANGIBLE ASSETS:

      

Acquired ICFAs

   17,978     (12,154   5,824  

Sonoran contract rights

   7,406     (2,003   5,403  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   25,384     (14,157   11,227  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total intangible assets

  $26,929    $(14,157  $12,772  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Acquired ICFAs and Sonoran acquisition was allocated to the net assets acquired as follows:

     
Net assets of acquired utilities:    
Utility plant $12,206,557 
Intangible asset—contract rights  7,406,298 
Current assets  163,316 
Advances in aid of construction  (871,857)
Current liabilities  (1,670,283)
     
Net assets acquired $17,234,031 
     
The intangible asset represents the fair value of certain ICFAs acquired based on the expected discountedcontract rights are amortized when cash flows under the agreements. The intangible asset is being amortizedreceived in proportion to the infrastructure coordination and financing fees recognizedamount of total cash expected to be received under the agreements when meters are installed. The Company


F-16


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
recorded $310,703, $628,850 and $132,810 of amortization relatedunderlying agreements. Due to the intangible asset in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
On March 3, 2005, GWI purchased the total issued and outstanding shares of Cave Creek for $4.65 million. In addition, liabilities for existing debt and a lawsuit settlement were paid totaling an additional $1.58 million. At the same time, GWI purchased the total issued and outstanding shares of Pacer for $795,924.
6. PERMITS
Pinal County, Arizona—GW-PV Wastewater and Environmental Permits—GW-PV is required to maintain an Aquifer Protection Permit (APP), various Re-Use Permits, a surface water discharge permit (“AzPDES”) and an air quality permit. The APP is designed to protect the receiving environment from any adverse effectsuncertainty of the locationtiming of water from a wastewater treatment facility. Re-Use Permits maintain control overwhen cash will be received under ICFA agreements, we cannot reliably estimate when the disposition of water from wastewater facilities, and AzPDES governsremaining intangible assets amortization will be recorded. No amortization was recorded for these balances for the discharge of water to waters of the United States. The air quality permit is designed to limit the amount of particulates and nitrous oxide to the atmosphere.
GW-PV is governed by the Pinal County 208 Water Quality planning process and must ensure that all expansion activities are consistent with the 208 Quality Management Plan under the requirements of the Clean Water Act.
Pinal County, Arizona—GW-SC Assured Water Supply—GW-SC must provide assurances of the availability of water for customers through an Assured Water Supply (AWS) designation. The quality of the water is governed by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ), under the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act.
As of May 4, 2006, ADWR ruled that GW-SC had demonstrated the physical, continuous, and legal availability of groundwater in a volume of25,575.16 acre-feet per year for a minimum of 100 years and adequate to cover the current, committed, projected demand of23,477.3 acre-feet per year. In addition, onended December 31, 2007 GW-SC received approval from ADWR for an additional16,967.6 acre-feet per year bringing the total to40,444.9 acre-feet per year. The water delivered for the service area right reduces the AWS for GW-SC. GW-SC also withdraws and delivers water pursuant to other rights. The other rights include the water pumped for a golf course located within the utility service area that is pumped under a Type 1 Permit and water pumped for lake evaporation and irrigation pursuant to multiple Interim Use Permits until recycled water is sufficient. GW-SC is allowed to charge revenues based upon the tariff for pumping these other water rights. For their purposes, annual water reports are filed with ADWR.
Maricopa County, Arizona Assured Water Supply—Valencia, Greater Buckeye, Greater Tonopah, and WUNS—Within these service areas, customers must obtain a certificate of AWS prior to receiving service. Greater Tonopah is currently seeking a designation for AWS. The quality of the water is governed by the ADEQ, under the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act, which in Maricopa County is administered by the Maricopa County Environmental Services Department.
Mohave County, Arizona Assured Water Supply—Willow Valley Water Company—Within this service area, customers must obtain a Letter of Adequate Water Supply prior to receiving service. The quality of the water is governed and administered by the ADEQ, under the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act.
West Maricopa Combine, Inc. Hassayampa River Recharge Project—The ADWR has issued underground storage facility (USF) permits to allow for the construction and operation of two facilities to a maximum annual recharge of25,000 acre-feet of Central Arizona Project water per facility into the Hassayampa River. Construction


F-17

2014.


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
was completed in January 2007 for one of the two facilities of the Hassayampa River Recharge Project. On June 20, 2007, an agreement with the Arizona Water Banking Authority (“AWBA”) was signed to take delivery and store water pursuant to AWBA’s water storage permit.
Greater Tonopah and Greater Buckeye applied for and received water storage permits (WSP) in order to store and bank water in an USF. Greater Tonopah and Greater Buckeye have committed to ordering 20,000 acre feet of CAP water at a price of $51.00 per acre foot. The water will be stored and recharged during 2008 and eligible for sale in 2009.
In addition to the above permits from ADWR, the recharge facility also maintains state of Arizona flowage easements and a Bureau of Land Management flowage easement.
8.
7. TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES
The Company provides

We provide medical benefits to itsour employees through itsour participation in a pooled plan sponsored by an affiliate of the managing membera shareholder and director of the Company. Total premiumsMedical claims paid intoto the plan were $179,942, $464,552approximately $532,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.

GWR Global Water Resources Corp. was organized in 2010 and $260,764holds an approximate 48.1% interest in 2007, 2006the Company. GWRC is not part of the consolidated Company. GWRC has no employees and 2005, respectively.GWRI provides for the ongoing management and general administration of all of GWRC’s business affairs pursuant to a management agreement between GWRC and GWRI to provide such services. Accordingly, GWRC is economically dependent on the Company. Services provided by the Company under the management agreement are provided at no charge to GWRC, and are not monetarily significant. However, GWRC does incur certain costs not covered by the management agreement. These include GWRC’s accounting fees, listing fees and other costs directly associated with operating as a publicly traded company. Whereas GWRC does not expect to generate cash flows from operating activities, the operating costs incurred by GWRC are paid by the Company. Amounts paid by GWRI on GWRC’s behalf during the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 totaled $505,000. The Company also obtains legalaccounts for such payments as equity distributions to GWRC.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company provided cash advances of $519,000 to satisfy GWRC’s short term cash obligations. The amount advanced is utilized to fund GWRC’s monthly dividend and other cash requirements, as needed. The residual balance of the cash advance is presented on the Company’s December 31, 2014 balance sheet in due from related party. The related party balance will be reduced upon dividend declaration, when the amount declared is presented as a reduction in equity. As of December 31, 2014, the balance of the advance was $188,000.

GWM has historically provided billing, customer service and other support services for the Company’s regulated utilities. Amounts collected by GWM from the Company’s customers that GWM has not yet remitted to the Company are included within the ‘due from related party’ caption on the Company’s

-F-20-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2014, the unremitted balance totaled $457,000. Notwithstanding the sale of GWM on June 5, 2013, FATHOM will continue to provide these services to the Company’s regulated utilities under a law firm in which one of its members has an interest. Total legallong-term service agreement. Based on current service connections, we estimate that fees to be paid to this law firm were $283,462, $240,801 and $128,039 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

InGWM for FATHOM services will be $7.69 per water account/month, which is an annual rate of approximately $2.4 million. For the year ended December 2005,31, 2014 the Company entered into a financial consulting agreement with a managing member. Fees under the agreement are calculated asincurred FATHOM service fees of approximately $2.4 million.

The Company is entitled to quarterly royalty payments based on a percentage of the outstanding borrowings under the Company’s revolving linecertain of credit (see Note 9), for which the managing member providesGWM’s recurring revenues. These royalty payments will continue over a guarantee. In 2007, 2006 and 2005, approximately $604,000, $403,000 and $9,000, respectively, was incurred in connection with this agreement and recorded as interest expense in the combined consolidated financial statements.

8. 401(K) PLAN
The Company provides a 401(k) retirement plan for its employees. All employees become eligible for participation in the plan after three months of service. The participant’s vested interest in Company contributions increases on an annual basis with the participant becoming fully vested after three years of service. The Company may make contributions10-year period subsequent to the plan in an amount determined at the sole discretionsale of the Company.GWM, up to a maximum of $15.0 million. The Company made contributionsthe election to record these quarterly royalty payments prospectively in income as the amounts are earned. Royalties recorded within other income totaled approximately $272,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.

9.ACCRUED LIABILIITIES

Accrued liabilities at December 31, 2014 consist of $85,764, $69,817the following (in thousands of US$):

   December 31, 2014 

Deferred compensation

  $1,551  

Interest

   1,066  

Property taxes

   1,038  

Other Accrued liabilities

   3,177  
  

 

 

 

Total accrued liabilities

  $6,832  
  

 

 

 

10.DEBT

The outstanding balances and $48,688 in 2007, 2006maturity dates for short-term (including the current portion of long-term debt) and 2005, respectively.long-term debt as of December 31, 2014 are as follows (in thousands of US$):

   December 31, 2014 
   Short-term   Long-term 

BONDS PAYABLE—

    

5.450% Series 2006, maturing December 1, 2017

  $930    $2,025  

5.600% Series 2006, maturing December 1, 2022

   —       6,215  

5.750% Series 2006, maturing December 1, 2032

   —       23,370  

6.550% Series 2007, maturing December 1, 2037—net of unamortized discount of $359 at December 30, 2014

   660     50,856  

6.375% Series 2008, maturing December 1, 2018

   185     635  

7.500% Series 2008, maturing December 1, 2038

   —       23,235  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   1,775     106,336  

TERM LOAN—

    

LIBOR plus 3.00% MidFirst Term Loan, maturing November 10, 2024

   788     20,929  

OTHER LOANS—

    

Capital lease obligations

   90     226  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total debt

  $2,653    $127,491  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
9. LONG-TERM DEBT
The Company

Tax Exempt Bonds—We issued tax exempt bonds through The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima in the amount of $36,495,000 on December 28, 2006 and $53,624,175,2006; $53,624,000, net of a discount of $510,825,

-F-21-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

$511,000, on November 19, 2007.2007; and $24,550,000 on October 1, 2008. The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds (Global Water Resources, LLC Project), Series 2006, 2007 and 2007 (“Bonds”)2008 bonds have interest payable semiannually on the first of June and December. Recurring annual payments of principal are payable annually on the first of December withfor the Series 2006, bond commencing2007 and 2008 Bonds. Proceeds from these bonds were used for qualifying costs of constructing and equipping the water and wastewater treatment facilities of our subsidiaries, Palo Verde and Santa Cruz. The Company has not granted any deed of trust, mortgage, or other lien on property of Santa Cruz or Palo Verde. These bonds are secured by a security agreement that gives the trustee rights to the net operating income generated by our Santa Cruz and Palo Verde utilities. The tax exempt bonds require we maintain a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.10:1.00, tested annually based on the combined operating results of our Santa Cruz and Palo Verde utilities.

2012 Financings—On June 29, 2012, we secured $25,000,000 of financing consisting of $7,625,000 of tax-exempt revenue bonds (the “Series 2012A Bonds”) and $6,375,000 taxable revenue bonds (the “Series 2012B Bonds”) through The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima, and an $11,000,000 term loan through Regions Bank (the “2012 Term Loan”).

These loans had semiannual interest payments and annual principal payments, which commenced December 1, 2007.2012. The Series 2012A Bonds accrued interest at a rate of 65% of LIBOR plus 242 or 292 basis points (“bps”) depending on debt service coverage ratios, and the Series 2012B Bonds accrued interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 250 or 300 bps also depending upon debt service coverage ratios. The 2012 Term Loan accrued interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 325 bps. The Series 2012A Bonds, Series 2012B Bonds and 2012 Term Loan were retired in November 2014, with the addition of the MidFirst Term Loan in November 2014.

Prior to retirement, we amended the 2012 Term Loan with Regions Bank in March 2014. In conjunction with the amendment to the 2012 Term Loan, on March 31, 2014, the Company agreed to make an unscheduled $1,000,000 prepayment to Regions Bank representing a portion of the term loan principal payment that was previously scheduled to be paid December 1, 2014.

MidFirst Term Loan—In November 2014, we secured a $21,800,000 term loan from MidFirst bank (“MidFirst Term Loan”). Principal and interest are paid monthly with payments calculated using a 20 year amortization schedule. The note matures in November 2024. The MidFirst Term Loan accrues interest at a variable rate of LIBOR plus 300 basis points. The note is collateralized with a security interest from customer payments for the remaining utilities included within WMC.

The MidFirst Term Loan has financial covenants requiring the Company maintain (a) a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of no less than 1.10:1.00 as of December 31, 2014, 1.20:1.00 as of December 31, 2015 and 1.20:1.00 measured on a rolling four quarter basis beginning with the Bonds is payable solely from revenuesquarter ended March 31, 2016; and other monies available under the indenture securing the Bonds. A portion of the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds was used to fund(b) a debt service reserve fund and to pay certain costs incurred in connection witha controlled account in the issuanceamount of $1.0 million. The Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is calculated as the ratio of the Bonds. The remaining proceedssum of consolidated net income plus interest expense, taxes, non-cash charges, real property rent expense, extraordinary losses, depreciation and amortization, less extraordinary and/or unusual non-recurring gains, non-cash gains and distributions, to the salesum of the Bonds were used bycash paid for interest expense plus scheduled debt principal payments, real property rent expense and schedule capital lease payments.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company to reimburse the costs of construction and equipping of water and wastewater treatment facilities utilized bywas in compliance with its wholly owned subsidiaries, GW-PV and GW-SC.

The Company is required to maintain afinancial debt service reserve fund equal to the least of (1) 10% of the stated principal amount of the Bonds, (2) maximum annual debt service of the Bonds, and (3) 125% of the average annual debt service on the Bonds, as determined separately for each Series. The Bond indentures
covenants.


F-18

-F-22-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
requires the CompanyINC.

Notes to maintain a minimum ratio of 1.10 of defined annual income available for debt service to maximum annual debt service over the term of the Bonds. We are in compliance with this requirement as ofConsolidated Financial Statements

At December 31, 2007.

On2014, the remaining aggregate annual maturities of our debt and minimum lease payments under capital lease obligations for the years ended December 31 2007,are as follows (in thousands of US$):

   Debt   Capital Lease
Obligations
 

2015

  $2,563    $113  

2016

   2,699     111  

2017

   2,838     86  

2018

   2,990     52  

2019

   3,379     1  

Thereafter

   115,717     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal

  $130,186    $363  

Less: amount representing interest

   —       (45
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $130,186    $318  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

At December 31, 2014, the carrying value of the non-current portion of long-term debt was $128.2$127.5 million, with an estimated fair value of $126.8$143.1 million. The carrying value of our long-term debt was $60.6 million on December 31, 2006, which approximated fair value. The fair value of our debt was estimated based on interest rates considered to be available for instruments of similar terms and remaining maturities.

The interest rate and maturity schedule of the Bonds is as follows:
             
Series 2006
 Interest
 Maturity
 Redemption
Principal Amount
 Rate Date Price
 
$6,910,000   5.450% December 1, 2017  100%
 6,215,000   5.600  December 1, 2022  100 
 23,370,000   5.750  December 1, 2032  100 
             
Series 2007
 Interest
 Maturity
 Redemption
Principal Amount
 Rate Date Price
 
$1,635,000   5.500% December 1, 2013  100%
 52,500,000   6.550  December 1, 2037  100 

11.INCOME TAXES

The Company has a credit agreement with a bank providingutilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for a $60 million revolving line of credit. The availability ofincome taxes. Under the Company’s line of credit was reduced from $80 million to $60 million upon the issuance of the Series 2007 Bonds. Interest on the line of credit is at the bank’s prime rate less 1.25% (6% at December 31, 2007). The Company has the option to fix the rate on a portion of its outstanding borrowings at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), plus 1.25%. A fee equal to 0.125% per annum is assessed quarterly on the average daily unused amount of the line of credit. The line of credit has an expiration date of March 31, 2009, is guaranteed by the Company’s managing member,asset and is collateralized by GWR’s interest in GW-PV, GW-SC, Cave Creek, Pacer, WMC, Valencia Water, Willow Valley, Greater Buckeye, Greater Tonopah, WUNS, CP and the members’ interests in GWM as well as certain other assets of the Company, and requires the Company to meet certain financial covenants, primarily a cash coverage ratio of 1.35:1. In addition, the line of credit has a letter of credit sub-feature, which allows for up to $15 million of the total line to be outstanding at any time in the form of letters of credit. As of December 31, 2007, $3,339,000 in letters of credit had been issued, and $35,438,803 was outstanding on the line of credit.

The Company had other loans outstanding totaling $2,740,891 and $1,409,167 at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The interest rates on these loans range from 4.375% to 8.0%. They mature between 2008 and 2026.
The Company had interest expense in 2007 and 2006 of $2,537,597 and $1,247,951, respectively, related to the accretion of the WMC purchase liability (see Note 5).


F-19


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The aggregate annual maturities of all debt is as follows:
    
2008 $137,861
2009  35,535,013
2010  807,587
2011  1,369,393
2012  1,451,658
Thereafter  88,993,237
    
Total $128,294,749
    
10. INCOME TAXES
Certainmethod, deferred tax assets and liabilities are reported differentlyrecognized for incomethe future tax purposes than forconsequences attributable to differences between the financial statement purposes. Thecarrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax effectbases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of these differencesmanagement, it is recorded asmore likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred taxes. We calculate deferred taxes using the current income tax rates.
We adopted FIN 48 “Accounting for Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” on January 1, 2007. The effect of applying the new guidance wasassets will not significantly different from the application of our previous policy.be realized. The Company does not have any significant unrecognizeduncertain tax benefits.
positions.

The income tax (benefit) expensebenefit from continuing operations for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 20052014 is comprised of:

             
  2007  2006  2005 
 
Current income tax expense $  $10,333  $ 
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense  (1,404,135)  (750,373)   
             
Income tax (benefit) expense $(1,404,135) $(740,040) $ 
             
of (in thousands of US$):

   2014 
   Federal   State   Total 

Current income tax benefit

  $(10   (1   (11

Deferred income tax benefit

   (15,472   (1,512   (16,984
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax benefit

  $(15,482   (1,513   (16,995
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

-F-23-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The income tax (benefit) expensebenefit for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 20052014 differs from the amount that would be computed using the federal statutory income tax rate due to the following:

             
  2007  2006  2005 
 
Computed Federal tax expense at statutory rate $205,670  $1,896,198  $1,839,416 
Non taxable entities  (1,442,319)  (2,500,977)  (1,839,416)
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit  (167,486)  (81,823)   
Other, net     (53,438)   
             
Actual income tax (benefit) expense $(1,404,135) $(740,040) $ 
             
following (in thousands of US$):


F-20

   2014 
   Federal   State   Total 

Computed federal tax expense at statutory rate

  $14,848     1,450     16,298  

State income taxes—net of federal tax benefit

   1,873     183     2,056  

Valuation allowance

   (32,613   (3,187   (35,800

Taxable meter deposits

   16     2     18  

Other differences

   398     39     437  

Permanent differences

   6     1     7  

Tax credits

   (10   (1   (11
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax benefit

  $(15,482   (1,513   (16,995
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

ASC Topic 740,Income Taxes, prescribes the method to determine whether a deferred tax asset is realizable and significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. During 2012, as a result of the cumulative losses experienced over the prior three years, which under the accounting standard represented significant objective negative evidence and prohibited the Company from considering projected income, we concluded that a full valuation allowance should be recorded against our net deferred tax assets. As mentioned in Note 3 above, as a result of the additional revenues expected to be provided by Rate Decision No. 74364, as well as other factors, the Company re-evaluated its deferred income taxes and determined that sufficient evidence now exists that the majority of the Company’s net deferred tax assets will be utilized in the future. Accordingly, during the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company reversed substantially all of the deferred tax valuation allowance of $35.8 million recorded as of December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2014, the valuation allowance totaled $8,500, which relates to state net operating loss carryforwards expected to expire prior to utilization.

-F-24-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The tax effects offollowing table summarizes the Company’s temporary differences between book and tax accounting that give rise to the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, including the valuation allowance, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:

         
  2007  2006 
 
Deferred tax assets:        
Taxable meter deposits $579,709  $508,422 
Net operating loss carryforwards  788,724   226,806 
Utility plant and equipment  200,890    
Other  87,408   90,140 
         
Total deferred tax assets  1,656,731   825,368 
         
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Recharge permits  (2,192,232)  (2,172,483)
Acquisition liability  (649,922)  (952,905)
Utility plant and equipment     (2,628,975)
Deferred gain on sale of assets — discontinued operations  (5,108,060)   
Tax accounting method change     (218,736)
         
Total deferred tax assets  (7,950,214)  (5,973,099)
         
Net deferred tax liability $(6,293,483) $(5,147,731)
         
GW-SC, GW-PV, Cave Creek, Pacer, Hassayampa, Picacho Water, Picacho, CP, FG and WMC are included in the GWI consolidated federal and state income tax returns.
2014 (in thousands of US$):

   December 31, 2014 

DEFERRED TAX ASSETS:

  

Taxable meter deposits

  $711  

Net operating loss carry forwards

   4,785  

Balterra intangible asset acquisition

   336  

Deferred gain on Sale of GWM

   921  

Deferred gain on ICFA funds received

   7,364  

Regulatory liability related to intangible assets

   2,933  

Equity investment loss

   210  

Property, plant and equipment

   1,669  

Other

   761  
  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   19,690  

Valuation allowance

   (9
  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax asset

   19,681  
  

 

 

 

DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES:

  

CP Water intangible asset acquisition

   (572

ICFA intangible asset

   (2,712
  

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (3,284
  

 

 

 

Net deferred tax asset

  $16,397  
  

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2007, the Company’s taxable subsidiaries2014, we have approximately $2,000,000$13.1 million in federal and state net operating loss (NOL)(“NOL”) carry forwards and $9.6 million in state NOLs available to offset future taxable income, with the NOLs expiring through 2027. These NOL carry forwards arose primarily fromin 2029-2032 for the deferralfederal return and expiring in 2015-2032 for the state return (effective for the 2012 tax year and thereafter, state NOLs for the state of Arizona expire after 20 years).

12.DEFERRED COMPENSATION AWARDS

Stock-based compensation—Stock-based compensation related to option awards is measured based on the fair value of the $13,233,319 tax gain onaward. The fair value of stock option awards is determined using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. We recognize compensation expense associated with the options over the vesting period.

At December 31, 2014, there were options to acquire 431 shares of common stock of GWRI outstanding. The options were all vested and exercisable at December 31, 2014. The stock options have a remaining contractual life of approximately 3.50 years and have an exercise price of $870.66 per share.

GWRC stock option grant—In January 2012, GWRC’s Board of Directors granted options to acquire 385,697 GWRC common shares to nine employees of GWRI in lieu of paying cash bonuses for 2011. The options vested in equal installments over the eight quarters of 2012 and 2013, with exercise prices of C$7.50 and C$4.00 per share and expire four years after the date of issuance. We accounted for the GWRC stock option grant in accordance with ASC 323,Investment-Equity Method & Joint Ventures. The Company remeasured the fair value of the award at the end of each period until the options fully vested.

Due to attrition and the sale of assets fromGWM, certain former employees of the condemnationCompany forfeited their stock options. The number of Cave Creek (see Note 12)stock options forfeited totaled 116,470, resulting in stock options of 269,227 outstanding at December 31, 2014.

-F-25-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

There was no stock-based compensation expense recorded during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Phantom stock compensation—On December 30, 2010, we adopted a phantom stock unit plan (the “PSU Plan”) authorizing the directors of the Company to issue phantom stock units (“PSUs”) to our employees. The value of the PSUs issued under the plan tracks the performance of GWRC’s shares and deductible interest ongives rise to a right of the intercompany note discussed below.

An intercompany note was issued in 2006 between GWR and GWIholder to account for advances to GWI to acquire and maintain utility assets. The principal balance of this note and any accrued interest is due and payable on demand. During 2006, the note earned interest on the unpaid balance atreceive a variable rate. During 2007, interest on the note was set at the Internal Revenue Service applicable federal rate (AFR) of 4.92% per annum. The note and related interest have been eliminated in the combined financial statements.
11. MEMBERS’ EQUITY
Members in both GWR and GWM receive an 8% preferred return on their capital contributions. Once members have received distributions equal tocash payment the value of their capital contributions, pluswhich, on a particular date, will be the preferred return, distributions are made in proportionmarket value of the equivalent number of shares of GWRC at that date. The issuance of PSUs as a core component of employee compensation is intended to their common ownership percentages. Mandatory distributions are made duringstrengthen the year in amounts sufficient to allow each member to make income tax payments required to be made in respectalignment of each member’s allocation of net profits and losses. Such tax distributions are treated as distributions of common unit profits. Ininterests between the event of a liquidationemployees of the Company any distributions that have beenand the shareholders of GWRC by linking their holdings and a portion of their compensation to the future value of the common shares of GWRC.

On December 30, 2010, 350,000 PSUs were issued to members of management, with an initial value of approximately $2.6 million. PSUs are accounted for as liability compensatory awards under ASC 710,Compensation—General, rather than as equity awards. The PSU awards are remeasured each period based on the present value of the benefits expected to be provided to the employee upon vesting, which benefits are based on GWRC’s share price multiplied by the number of units. The present value of the benefits is recorded as expense in the Company’s financial statements over the related vesting period. The December 30, 2010 PSUs vested at the end of four years from the date of their issuance. There is no exercise price attached to PSU awards. As of December 31, 2014, 303,333 of these PSUs remain outstanding. The value of the PSUs were paid to the holders in January 2015.

In January 2012, 135,079 additional PSUs were issued to nine members of management as a memberreward for performance in 2011. The PSUs issued to management vest ratably over 12 consecutive quarters beginning January 1, 2012 and are accounted for as liability compensatory awards similar to the PSUs issued in December 2010. These PSUs are remeasured each period and a liability recorded equal to GWRC’s closing share price on the period end date multiplied by the number of units vested. As of December 31, 2014, 8,491 of these PSUs remain outstanding.

During the first quarter of 2013, 76,492 PSUs were issued to nine members of management as a reward for performance in 2012. The PSUs issued to management vest ratably over 12 consecutive quarters beginning January 1, 2013 and are accounted for as liability compensatory awards similar to the PSUs issued in December 2010 and January 2012. These PSUs will be remeasured each period and a liability will be recorded equal to GWRC’s closing share price on the period end date multiplied by the number of units vested. As of December 31, 2014, 27,393 of these PSUs remain outstanding.

During the first quarter of 2014, 8,775 PSUs were issued to three members of management as a reward for performance in 2013. These PSUs vest ratably over 12 consecutive quarters beginning January 1, 2014. As of December 31, 2014, 3,341 of these PSUs remain outstanding.

Stock appreciation rights compensation—In January 2012, in an effort to reward employees for their performance in 2011 as well as to recognize performance since 2007, the last year the Company paid bonuses, we adopted a stock appreciation rights plan (the “SAR Plan”) authorizing the directors of the Company to issue stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) to our employees. The value of the SARs issued under the plan track the performance of GWRC’s shares. Each holder of the January 2012 award has the right to receive a cash payment amounting to the difference between C$4.00 per share (the “exercise price”) and the closing price of GWRC’s common shares on the exercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of C$4.00 per share. In total, 152,091 SARs were issued to employees below the member’s allocated profitssenior management level, and 31,059 remained outstanding as of December 31, 2014. The SARs vested in equal installments over the four quarters of 2012 and will be reimbursed byexpire four years after the members.

12. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Pursuant to a condemnation proceeding, on March 7, 2007,date of issuance. Holders of SARs may exercise their awards once they have vested. Individuals who voluntarily or involuntarily leave the Company agreed to conveyforfeit their rights under the assets of Cave Creek and Pacer to the Town of Cave Creek (the “Town”) as a sale and purchase. The total purchase price was $19,500,000 which along with interest was paid by the Town in two installments in 2007. The condemnation
awards.


F-21

-F-26-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
transaction resultedINC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

SARs are accounted for as liability compensatory awards under ASC 710, Compensation—General, rather than as equity awards. The 2012 SAR awards will be remeasured each period based on GWRC’s share price relative to the C$4.00 per share exercise price. To the extent that GWRC’s share price exceeds C$4.00 per share, a liability will be recorded in other accrued liabilities in the Company’s financial statements representing the present value of the benefits expected to be provided to the employee upon exercise.

In the third quarter of 2013, the Company granted 100,000 SARs to a pre-tax gainkey executive of $6,484,488 which is included in incomethe Company. These SARs vest ratably over sixteen quarters from discontinued operations. The tax gainthe grant date and give the employee the right to receive a cash payment amounting to the difference between C$2.00 per share (the “exercise price”) and the closing price of GWRC’s common shares on the saleexercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of C$2.00 per share. The exercise price was determined by taking the weighted average share price of the five days prior to July 1, 2013.

In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company granted 100,000 SARs to a newly hired officer of the Company. These SARs vest ratably over sixteen quarters from the grant date and give the employee the right to receive a cash payment amounting to the difference between C$3.38 per share (the “exercise price”) and the closing price of GWRC’s common shares on the exercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of C$3.38 per share. The exercise price was determined by taking the weighted average share price of the 30 days prior to November 14, 2013.

The Company recorded approximately $1.3 million of compensation expense related to the PSUs and SARs for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014. Based on GWRC’s closing share price on December 31, 2014 deferred under Internal Revenue Code Section 1033 election and will either reduce the tax basis of replacement assets acquired orcompensation expense to be recognized in taxable income in aover future period. Revenues of the discontinued operationsperiods is estimated for the years ending December 31 as follows (in thousands of US$):

   PSU   SARs 

2015

   105     109  

2016

   6     109  

2017

   —       64  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $111    $282  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

13.SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

The following is supplemental cash flow information for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 are $393,260, $1,926,918, and $1,575,030, respectively.

2014 (in thousands of US$):

   Twelve Months Ended
December 31, 2014
 

Cash paid for interest

  $8,116  

Capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

   253  

Bond reserve funds used to repay bond debt

   1,833  

Equity method investment gain on recapitalization of FATHOM

   1,088  

14.
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

CommitmentsThe Company leasesPrior to the sale of GWM, we leased certain office space in Arizona under operating leases. The leases with terms that expire in November 2011 with an optionFebruary 2016. The operating lease agreements are between GWM and the landlord. Accordingly, effective June 5, 2013, the Company is no longer a party under the lease agreements. Nevertheless, GWRI continues to renewutilize a portion of the office space covered under the lease agreements. For the 2014 year, the Company leased office space from GWM for another five years.approximately $5,000 per month. Rent expense arising from the operating leases totaled approximately $70,000 for the yearstwelve months ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, was approximately $491,000, $442,000 and $133,000, respectively. Future minimum rental payments for the years ending December 31 are as follows:

     
2008 $491,581 
2009  502,115 
2010  512,649 
2011  473,147 
     
Total $1,979,492 
     
GWR entered into regional infrastructure partnership agreements with the cities of Maricopa, Casa Grande and the Town of Buckeye (“Buckeye”). These memoranda of understandings represent public-private-partnerships (“P3”) where GWR provides regional water, wastewater and water reclamation master plan which will reduce groundwater usage through the widespread use of reclaimed water, reduce the area’s reliance on groundwater through the introduction of surface water treatment, and provide for long term aquifer recharge in the basin. For the opportunity to master plan and serve in the city’s planning areas, these agreements provide the cities with long term revenue streams to help manage growth and the provision of essential services to thousands of new residents. The fees paid to the cities are based on the number of new connections and revenue. Amounts paid under these agreements were $455,989, $379,178, and $0 for 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Contingencies—ICFAs—ICFAs are voluntary, alternative financing mechanisms GWR periodically employs, which allow developers and homebuilders to defer financial participation in the up-front investment in infrastructure and relegates their involvement to certain future payment obligations. GWR takes a security interest in the Developer’s real property when the ICFAs are recorded against the land. Under the ICFA, payment is made upon the occurrence of certain regulatory or development milestones, or at the conclusion of the entitlement process. The largest of these fees are collectable from the Developers typically as their land is sold to homebuilders, which is typically concurrent with the receipt of final plat approval and the time the land is converted from agriculture to residential use. The ICFA fees are financing and coordination payments and are treated as revenue by GWR. The ICFA allows GWR, through its regulated subsidiaries, to plan, and construct regional infrastructure, for water, wastewater, and recycled water that ensures the maximum conservation and reuse. Further, the ICFA offers the opportunity for the Company to capture the maximum economies of scale through regional infrastructure planning and construction with a wide range of timing needs among various land developers.
The utility companies benefiting from this financing mechanism do not have pending rate applications before the Commission at this time. The ICFAs are under review by the Commission in a “complaint docket” brought by a competitor, Arizona Water Company (Docket NumberW-01445A-06-0200). Arizona Water Company alleges that the ICFAs are illegal, and that they violate the policies and practices of the Commission.
2014.


F-22

-F-27-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

We also lease the land on which one of our owned regional offices is located on a year-to-year basis. Rent expense associated with this land lease totaled approximately $8,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014.

See also Note 8 regarding our commitment to provide services to GWRC.

ContingenciesLegal MattersGlobal Water Resources, Inc v. Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT,and New World Properties, Inc (American Arbitration Association Case No. 76 198 Y 0010411 & 76 198 Y 0010511 respectively)
: GWRI filed a claim against Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The docket is currently under a time suspension due to ongoing settlement discussions between GWR (“SNR”) and Arizona Water Company.
The ICFAs are also under review in “generic docket.” On October 6, 2006, the Commission Staff issued a Staff Report in the Commission Staff, No.W-00000C-06-0149,In the MatterNew World Properties, Inc (“NWP”) for breach of the Commission’s Generic Evaluation of the Regulatory Impact From the Use of Non-TraditionalInfrastructure Coordination and Financing Arrangements by Water Utilities and Their Affiliates(the “Generic Docket”). This Staff Report states that it is Staff’s “preliminary evaluation” that under certain circumstances, ICFA fees should be treated as Advances in Aid of Construction or Contributions in Aid of Construction. The Commission has not acted on the Staff Report, and it is unclear what further steps will occur in the Generic Docket. The Commission Staff has subsequently stated that resolution of “the accounting treatment of the ICFAs... [is] best reserved for an actual rate proceeding.” (ACC Staff Brief dated March 12, 2007 in DocketNo. 06-0199 at p. 6)
The Company believes that the utilization of the ICFA is in the public interest and provides a framework for regional planning for the capture of economies of scale and for the maximization of conservation of water for the state of Arizona. There are, however, certain risks associated with the use of the methodology if the Commission concludes that the ICFA revenue stream should in fact be regulated and further imputed to have an effect on the rate base of the regulated utilities. The Company has taken the position that the after-tax proceeds of the ICFA revenue are useful as a methodology to support the aggregation and consolidation of Arizona’s smaller utilities. Upon ultimate resolution of this issue by the Commission, it is possible that the regulated utilities will see no impact from the utilization of ICFAs at GWR. It is also possible that the post-tax proceeds of the ICFA revenue may be deemed to be a contribution in aid of construction (CIAC), or there could be other outcomes, which could ultimately impact future rate regulated revenues of the regulated utilities. To date, the cumulative after-tax proceeds from ICFAs represent less than 25% of the invested capital in the regulated utilities and could result in a decrease in rate-base of the utility, substituting what is equity today with CIAC in the context of a future rate proceeding, which could adversely affect future utility rates, depending on the performance of the Company at the time of the rate proceeding. Additionally, ICFA fees would no longer be included in combined consolidated revenues.
Sonoran Acquisition—CC&N—On or about June 6, 2007, the Company was served with an amended complaint that named GWR, GW-PV, and GW-SC as parties to an existing Arizona State court action brought by Sonoran Utility Services, LLCAgreements (“Sonoran”Agreements”) against several parties. In 2005, Sonoran entered into an agreement to sell its utility assets to the Company (see Note 5). The complaint alleges that the Company gained control of Sonoran’s assets unfairly and for less than fair value, and engaged in other wrongful activity. The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages. The Company believes the sale was fairly negotiated over an extended period of time, that the complaint is frivolous and without valid basis, and intends to vigorously defend the matter. Management believes that the ultimate resolution of this matter will not have a material effect on its combined financial statements.
In 2003, the 387 DWID and 387 WWID (“Districts”) were formed under State law as a means of providing water and wastewater service to approximately 9 square miles of land in western Pinal County. The Districts were managed by Sonoran. In early 2005, SCWC and PVUC undertook negotiations with Sonoran to assume the management agreements with respect to the operation of the Districts in order to allow the districts to meet their service obligations. Emergency connection was made between the water systems (SCWC and 387 DWID) because the District wells exceeded the maximum contaminant level for nitrate. Concurrently, PVUC began pumping and hauling wastewater from collection systems and transporting it to PVUC’s treatment facilities because District conveyance and treatment systems were not completed. In September 2005, permanent interconnects were established between PVUC and 387 WWID.


F-23


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES AND
GLOBAL WATER MANAGEMENT, LLC

NOTES TO COMBINED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
In June 2005, SCWC and PVUC made application to the ACC to include the area serviced by the Districts in their respective CC&Ns. On February 23, 2006,developments. As the ACC issued an Order Preliminary granting the CC&NS subject to certain conditions. As a result of the legal structure of Orders Preliminary and the applicable deadlines, the order preliminary was vacated when certain deadlines were not met. On May 8, 2007, GW-PV and GW-SC applied under ARS40-252 to re-issue the Order Preliminary. This action was completed with formal re-instatement of the Order Preliminary on January 23, 2008. The sole remaining condition,Agreements require binding arbitration for which there is no time limit, remains the dissolution of the Districts.
WMC Purchase Liability—On July 11, 2006, GWI closed on the purchase of all outstanding shares of WMC. The purchase consideration was $60 million payable over time with the final payment being due on or before March 31, 2012. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, GWI, in March 2008, asserted an indemnification claim against the selling shareholders. The indemnification claim asserts $20.1 million in estimated lossesany dispute arising out of what GWI has allegedor relating in any way to be materially inaccurate shareholder representationsthe Agreements, we initiated a Demand for Arbitration and warranties containedStatement of Claim against SNR and NWP (collectively the “Respondents”) in May 2011 in response to the non-payment of certain fees due from Respondents to GWRI for major permitting milestones achieved. SNR and NWP did not dispute that we achieved the permit milestones that trigger payment. The monies we contended GWRI was owed pursuant to the Agreements from the Respondents were in excess of $3.7 million of principal (not including interest and recovery of litigation costs, which we pursued during arbitration). Including interest and litigation costs, GWRI sought in excess of $6.0 million. In response, SNR and NWP filed counterclaims for amongst other things, breach of contract and rescission. The arbitration hearing concluded on March 2, 2012 and the interim award was received on March 28, 2012 indicating GWRI as the prevailing party in the Stock Purchase Agreement.arbitration. The indemnification claim is secured by GWI’s right of setoff against future annual growth premium payments required underfinal award was received April 20, 2012. According to the Stock Purchase Agreement as describedaward, the arbitration panel found in Note 5. As a result, pending resolution of the indemnification claim, GWI will pay the required growth premium payments into escrow in accordance with the provisions of the Stock Purchase Agreement. In accordance with the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, GWI will first engage in a negotiation with the shareholdersCompany’s favor on almost all claims, and if necessary, the negotiation will be followed by a non-binding mediation and then, if necessary, binding arbitration proceedings. Givenruled that the Company is entitled to approximately $4.2 million of ICFA fees, 15% per annum interest totaling $2.0 million and recovery of 1/3 of the legal costs incurred in connection with the litigation. In August 2012, we received the monies due from NWP totaling $2,044,000, consisting of $1,219,000 of past due ICFA fees, $719,000 of interest and $106,000 of reimbursed litigation costs.

Subsequent to the award, SNR filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. In July 2013, the Bankruptcy court ruled that SNR must cure their default in order to assume the ICFA, which would require full payment of past due ICFA fees, interest and reimbursement of legal costs by no later than March 21, 2014, stating that such value would be determined by the court at a future date. In October 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with SNR wherein payment terms were set to serve as the basis of SNR’s bankruptcy plan of reorganization. Under the plan and settlement agreement that was approved by the court, the Company would receive monies due from SNR totaling $5,321,000, consisting of $2,802,000 of past due ICFA fees, $2,021,000 of interest (recorded withinother income (expense) in our statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014) and $498,000 of reimbursed litigation costs, all of which was received during the first quarter of 2014. With respect to the $2,802,000 ICFA fees mentioned above, since such amount was due to the Company prior to January 1, 2014, in accordance with Rate Decision No. 74364, we were not required to allocate any portion of the amount as a HUF.

Separately, on March 18, 2014, SNR and NWP filed an application for rehearing with the ACC regarding Rate Decision No. 74364. The application relates only to the particular issue of whether ICFA funds to be paid in the earliest stagesfuture will be subject to a Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) adjustment, which Rate Decision No. 74364 approved. The ACC had twenty days from the date of those proceedings,the application to decide if a rehearing would be granted, but that period passed without such action, eliminating any opportunity for rehearing.

From time to time, we are presently unable to predict the likelihood or extent of recovery on the indemnification claim.

Other—The Company ismay become involved in other proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes the ultimate resolution of such matters will not materially affect its combinedour financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

-F-28-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

15.
14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In February 2015, 299,000 SARs were issued to seven members of management. These awards were part of a plan to align the interest of employees with those of the shareholders of the Company, as well as to attract and retain employees who will contribute to the long-range success of the Company. The SARs issued to management vest ratably over 12 consecutive quarters beginning January 1, 2015 and are accounted for as liability compensatory awards similar to previously issued SARs. The SARs will be remeasured each period based on GWRC’s share price relative to the C$5.35 per share exercise price. The exercise price was determined to be the fair market value of one share of stock on the grant date of February 11, 2015.

During March 2015, 28,828 PSUs were issued to two members of management as a reward for performance in 2014. These PSUs vest ratably over 12 consecutive quarters beginning January 1, 2015.

On March 31, 2008,17, 2015, the outstanding balancesCompany reached a settlement agreement for a stipulated condemnation to sell the utility operating as Valencia Water Company, Inc. (“Valencia”) to the City of Buckeye (“Buckeye”), which was approved by Buckeye’s City Council on March 19, 2015. On July 14, 2015, the Company closed the stipulated condemnation of Valencia with the City of Buckeye. Terms of the Wells Fargo revolving linecondemnation were agreed upon through a settlement agreement in March 2015, wherein Buckeye acquired the operations and assets of credit were incorporated into a new credit agreement comprised of a $60 million revolving line of credit. This fourth modificationValencia and assumed operations of the credit agreement has the same terms with the exception of the reduction of the required cash coverage ratio from 1.5 to 1.35. The line of credit has an expiration date of March 31, 2009.

On April 8, 2008, the Commission approved the application for the creation of a CC&N for Picacho Water and Picacho. The area encompasses approximately 1,480 acres with 4,900 homes planned for the initial phase.
On April 9, 2008utility upon close. Buckeye paid the Company funded $6$55.0 million ofat close, subject to certain post-closing entries. Buckeye will also pay a growth premium payments into escrow in accordance with the provisions of the Stock Purchase Agreement between GWI and WMC.
On October 3, 2007, GWI signed a purchase and sale agreementequal to acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of Balterra Sewer Corp. (“Balterra”), an Arizona corporation, owning the right to provide wastewater services within western Maricopa County of Arizona. An initial payment of $250,000 was paid into escrow. The transfer of assets required approval from the Commission. In addition to the amount paid into escrow, an additional $925,000 is to be paid when the transfer is approved. Further consideration is payable in the form of future growth premiums payable 10 years from the closing in the amount of $100 per$3,000 for each new water meter installed within Valencia’s prior service areas, for a 20-year period ending January 1, 2035, subject to a maximum payout of $45.0 million over the Balterra 208 planning area.term of the agreement. A portion of the proceeds received from the condemnation were used to retire the MidFirst Term Loan.

On March 23, 2015 the Company reached an agreement to sell the assets of Willow Water Valley Co., Inc. (“Willow Valley”) to EPCOR Water Arizona Inc. (“EPCOR”). The closing occurredterms of the agreement are that EPCOR will purchase the operations, assets and rights used by Willow Valley to operate the utility system for approximately $2.5 million, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. The agreement is subject to final approval from the Arizona Corporate Commission (“ACC”). We anticipate final ACC approval to occur in the second quarter of 2016.

On March 24, 2015 the Company announced an increase to the monthly dividend on the common shares of the Company to an amount of C$0.026 per share. The annualized dividend amount of C$0.312 per share is an approximate 8% increase over previous declarations.

On May 11, 2015, GWRC received approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) to repurchase, for cancellation, common shares of the Company pursuant to a normal course issuer bid (“NCIB”). The NCIB enables GWRC to repurchase up to 87,500 common shares, representing approximately 1% of the Company’s 8,754,612 issued and outstanding common shares as of May 5, 2015. The NCIB commenced on May 13, 2015 and completed on December 30, 2015. Except as permitted under TSX rules, daily purchases were limited to a maximum of 3,239 common shares other than block purchase exemptions, which represented 25% of the average daily trading volume on the TSX for the six months ended April 30, 2015. All purchases under the NCIB were made on the open market through the facilities of the TSX by a participating organization. The actual number of shares purchased and the timing of such purchases were determined by GWRC considering market conditions, stock prices, its cash position and other factors. During the subsequent periods, GWRC repurchased, for cancellation, common shares of GWRC pursuant to the NCIB, 87,500 shares on the open market, for a total of approximately $481,000. The Company repurchased 871 common shares held by GWRC in connection with GWRC’s repurchases under its NCIB.

In May 2015, 300,000 SARs were granted to two key executives of the Company. These awards are part of a plan to align the interest of employees with those of the shareholders of the Company, as well as to attract and retain employees who will contribute to the long-range success of the Company. The SARs issued vest

-F-29-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

over the course of a four year period, vesting 20% per year for the first three years, with the remainder vesting in year four. Vesting begins April 1, 2015 with the SARs accounted for as liability compensatory awards similar to previously issued SARs. The SARs will be remeasured each period based on GWRC’s share price relative to the C$6.44 per share exercise price. The exercise price was determined to be the fair market value of one share of stock on the grant date of May 8, 2015.

On July 28, 2015, GWRC announced a special cash dividend of C$1.55 per share. This dividend was paid out on August 12, 2015 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 7, 2008.

2015.

On July 31, 2015, GWRC announced an increase to the monthly dividend on the common shares of the Company to an amount of C$0.0283 per share. The annualized dividend amount of C$0.3396 per share is an approximate 9% increase over previous declarations.

Subsequent events have been evaluated through January 19, 2016, the date of this report.

* * * * * *

-F-30-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014

(Unaudited)

   September 30,
2015
  December 31,
2014
 
   (in thousands of US$, except share data) 

ASSETS

   

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:

   

Property, plant and equipment

  $256,013   $318,995  

Less accumulated depreciation

   (62,402  (78,571
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net property, plant and equipment

   193,611    240,424  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

   16,767    6,577  

Accounts receivable—net

   1,299    1,365  

Due from related party

   773    645  

Accrued revenue

   1,871    1,762  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   890    353  

Deferred tax assets—current

   1,514    1,591  

Assets held for sale

   2,887    —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

   26,001    12,293  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OTHER ASSETS:

   

Goodwill

   —      13,082  

Intangible assets—net

   12,772    12,772  

Regulatory assets

   255    400  

Deposits

   13    25  

Bond service fund and other restricted cash

   9,042    9,927  

Debt issuance costs—net

   2,276    2,722  

Equity method investment—related party

   938    1,150  

Deferred tax assets

   —      14,806  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other assets

   25,296    54,884  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

  $244,908   $307,601  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

   

Accounts payable

  $1,356   $1,531  

Accrued expenses

   8,044    6,832  

Deferred revenue—current portion

   9    13  

Customer and meter deposits

   1,691    2,601  

Long-term debt—current portion

   1,883    2,653  

Liabilities held for sale

   503    —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

   13,486    13,630  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NONCURRENT LIABILITIES:

   

Long-term debt

   106,558    127,491  

Deferred regulatory gain

   19,730    19,730  

Regulatory liability

   7,859    7,859  

Advances in aid of construction

   60,070    89,206  

Contributions in aid of construction—net

   4,473    17,096  

Acquisition liability

   4,688    4,688  

Deferred income tax liability

   5,984    —    

Other noncurrent liabilities

   209    221  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total noncurrent liabilities

   209,571    266,291  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

   223,057    279,921  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (see Note 13)

   

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

   

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 181,449 and 182,050 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014

   2    2  

Paid in capital

   23,417    50,639  

Accumulated deficit

   (1,568  (22,961
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

   21,851    27,680  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

  $244,908   $307,601  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

-F-31-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

(Unaudited)

   Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   2015  2014 
   (in thousands of US$) 

REVENUES:

   

Water services

  $13,138   $13,831  

Wastewater and recycled water services

   11,243    10,561  

Unregulated revenues

   466    254  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

   24,847    24,646  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

   

Operations and maintenance

   5,607    6,062  

Operations and maintenance—related party

   1,712    1,793  

General and administrative

   5,891    6,610  

Gain on regulatory order

   —      (50,664

Depreciation

   6,526    6,926  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

   19,736    (29,273
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OPERATING INCOME

   5,111    53,919  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):

   

Gain on condemnation of Valencia

   43,074    —    

Interest income

   8    64  

Interest expense

   (6,496  (6,487

Other

   564    2,073  

Other—related party

   29    (276
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other income (expense)

   37,179    (4,626
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

   42,290    49,293  

INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE

   (20,897  16,477  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET INCOME

  $21,393   $65,770  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

  $117.63   $361.27  

Diluted earnings per common share

  $117.63   $361.27  

Dividends declared per common share

  C$178.69   C$15.40  

Dividends declared per common share

  $137.55   $14.20  

Weighted average number of common shares used in the determination of:

   

Basic earnings per common share

   181,860    182,050  

Diluted earnings per common share

   181,860    182,050  

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

-F-32-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

(Unaudited)

   Common Stock   Paid-in Capital  Accumulated
Deficit
  Total Equity 
   (in thousands of US$) 

BALANCE—December 31, 2013

  $2    $55,048   $(87,892 $(32,842

Dividend declared C$15.40 per share declared ($14.20 per share)

   —       (2,712  —      (2,712

Deemed distribution to related party

   —       (431  —      (431

Net income

   —       —      65,770    65,770  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

BALANCE—September 30, 2014

  $2    $51,905   $(22,122 $29,785  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

BALANCE—December 31, 2014

  $2    $50,639   $(22,961 $27,680  

Dividend declared C$178.69 per share declared ($137.55 per share)

   —       (26,544  —      (26,544

Deemed distribution to related party

   —       (351  —      (351

Share repurchase

   —       (327  —      (327

Net income

   —       —      21,393    21,393  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

BALANCE—September 30, 2015

  $2    $23,417   $(1,568 $21,851  
  

 

 

   

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

-F-33-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

(Unaudited)

   Nine Months Ended September 30, 
         2015              2014       
   (in thousands of US$) 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

   

Net income

  $21,393   $65,770  

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

   

Deferred compensation

   498    1,092  

Depreciation

   6,525    6,926  

Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and discounts

   158    266  

Write-off of debt issuance costs

   282    —    

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

   —      6  

Gain on condemnation of Valencia

   (43,074  —    

Gain on sale of Loop 303 Contracts

   (296  —    

Loss on equity method investment

   212    473  

Gain on regulatory order

   —      (50,664

Other gains and losses

   176    —    

Provision for doubtful accounts receivable

   55    55  

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

   20,865    (16,477

Changes in assets and liabilities:

   

Accounts receivable

   (28  (85

Other current assets

   (1,480  (154

Accounts payable and other current liabilities

   (165  2,190  

Other noncurrent assets

   118    28  

Other noncurrent liabilities

   —      2,852  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   5,239    12,278  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 
   

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

   

Capital expenditures

   (2,177  (1,054

Proceeds from the condemnation of Valencia

   55,198    —    

(Deposits) withdrawals of restricted cash

   (77  197  

Cash received from the sale of Loop 303 Contracts

   296    —    

Cash advance to related party

   (12,745  —    

Repayment of related party cash advance

   12,227    —    

Deposits received (refunded)

   7    —    
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

   52,729    (857
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

   

Proceeds withdrawn from bond service fund

   1,001    —    

Loan repayments

   (21,719  (1,007

Principal payments under capital leases

   (72  (85

Debt issuance costs paid

   —      (46

Advances in aid of construction

   282    301  

Dividends paid

   (26,521  (2,314

Share repurchase

   (327  —    

Refunds of advances for construction

   (422  (736
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

   (47,778  (3,887
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

   10,190    7,534  

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period

   6,577    1,960  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period

  $16,767   $9,494  
  

 

 

  

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

-F-34-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1.INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation—The condensed consolidated financial statements of Global Water Resources, Inc. (the “Company”, “GWRI”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) and related disclosures as of September 30, 2015 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 are unaudited. The December 31, 2014 condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted. These financial statements follow the same accounting policies and methods of their application as the Company’s most recent annual consolidated financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014. In our opinion, these financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for the fair statement of the results for the interim period. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Further, due to the seasonality of our business, the results for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 may not be consistent with results of operations for the full year.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of GWRI and all of its subsidiaries. All intercompany account balances and transactions between GWRI and its subsidiaries have been eliminated.

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and with the rules and regulations of the SEC. The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The U.S. dollar is our reporting currency and the Company’s functional currency.

Corporate TransactionsSale of certain MXA and WMA contracts—In September 2013, the Company sold its Wastewater Facilities Main Extension Agreements (“MXA”) and Offsite Water Management Agreements (“WMA”) along with their related rights and obligations to a third party (collectively the “Transfer of Project Agreement,” or “Loop 303 Contracts”). Pursuant to the Transfer of Project Agreement, GWRI will receive total proceeds of approximately $4.1 million over a multi-year period. As part of the consideration, GWRI agreed to complete certain engineering work required in the WMAs, which work had been completed prior to January 1, 2014. As the engineering work has been completed, the Company effectively has no further obligations under the WMAs, MXAs or the Transfer of Project Agreement. Prior to January 1, 2015, the Company had received $2.8 million of proceeds and recognized income of approximately $3.3 million within other income (expense) in the statement of operations related to the gain on the sale of these agreements and for the proceeds received prior to January 1, 2015 for engineering work required in the WMAs. The Company received additional proceeds of approximately $296,000 in April 2015 and recognized those amounts as income at that time. Receipt of the remaining $1.0 million of proceeds will occur and be recorded as additional income over time as certain milestones are met between the third party acquirer and the developers/landowners.

Stipulated condemnation—On July 14, 2015, the Company closed the stipulated condemnation to sell the utility operating as Valencia Water Company, Inc. (“Valencia”) to the City of Buckeye (“Buckeye”). Terms of the condemnation were agreed upon through a settlement agreement in March 2015, pursuant to which Buckeye acquired the operations and assets of Valencia and assumed operations of the utility upon close. Buckeye paid the Company $55.0 million at close, plus an additional $108,000 in working capital adjustments. As a result of the transaction, the Company recorded a gain of $43.1 million net of tax liability

of $20.2 million in the third quarter of 2015. Buckeye will also pay a growth premium equal to $3,000 for

-F-35-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)

each new water meter installed within Valencia’s prior service areas, for a 20-year period ending December 31, 2034, subject to a maximum payout of $45.0 million over the term of the agreement. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recognized $399,000 in other income within the condensed consolidated financial statements related to the earn out on growth premium.

In consideration of FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 205-20-45-1, the condemnation of Valencia transaction does not meet the criteria of discontinued operations. As the transaction did not change the services provided nor the manner in which the Company operates, it was determined the transaction did not represent a strategic shift and therefore does not qualify for presentation as a discontinued operation.

Pending sale of Willow Water Valley Co., Inc.—On March 23, 2015, the Company reached an agreement to sell the operations and assets of Willow Water Valley Co., Inc. (“Willow Valley”) to EPCOR Water Arizona Inc. (“EPCOR”). The terms of the agreement are that EPCOR will purchase the operations, assets and rights used by Willow Valley to operate the utility system for approximately $2.4 million, subject to current rate base calculations and certain post-closing adjustments. The transaction is subject to final approval from the Arizona Corporate Commission (the “Commission” or “ACC”). We anticipate final ACC approval to occur in the second quarter of 2016.

Per ASC 360-10-45-9 the assets and liabilities considered in the sale of Willow Valley were determined to meet the criteria to be classified as held for sale. The criteria utilized to make this determination are: (i) management has the authority and has entered into an agreement to sell the assets of Willow Valley; (ii) the assets and liabilities are available for immediate sale in their present condition; (iii) the approval from the ACC is probable within the next year; (iv) a reasonable price has been agreed upon; and (v) it is unlikely that significant changes to the agreement will be made prior to approval. In consideration of ASC 205-20-45-1, the Willow Valley transaction does not meet the criteria for discontinued operations. As the transaction did not change the services provided nor the manner in which the Company operates, it was determined the transactions do not represent a strategic shift and therefore do not qualify for presentation as a discontinued operation.

Additionally, as the carrying value of the assets and liabilities of Willow Valley were greater than the agreed upon sales price, a loss of $176,000 was recorded in other expense during the second quarter of 2015, when the assets were classified as held for sale, to adjust the carrying value of the asset group to the agreed upon fair value less cost to sell. The assets and liabilities included within the agreements are as follows:

September 30, 2015
Willow Valley
(in thousands of US$)

Property, plant and equipment

5,217

Less Accumulated Depreciation

(2,553

Net property, plant and equipment

2,664

Goodwill

223

Total assets

2,887

Advances in aid of construction

71

Contributions in aid of construction—net

432

Total liabilities

503

Normal Course Issuer Bid—On May 11, 2015, GWR Global Water Resources Corp. (“GWRC”) received approval from the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) to repurchase, for cancellation, common shares of GWRC pursuant to a normal course issuer bid (“NCIB”). The NCIB enables GWRC to repurchase up to 87,500 common shares, representing approximately 1% of GWRC’s 8,754,612 issued and outstanding

-F-36-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)

common shares as of May 5, 2015. The NCIB commenced on May 13, 2015 and will terminate on May 12, 2016. Except as permitted under TSX rules, daily purchases will be limited to a maximum of 3,239 common shares other than block purchase exemptions, which represented 25% of the average daily trading volume on the TSX for the six months ended April 30, 2015. All purchases under the NCIB will be made on the open market through the facilities of the TSX by a participating organization. The actual number of shares to be purchased and the timing of such purchases will be determined by GWRC considering market conditions, stock prices, its cash position and other factors. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, GWRC repurchased 60,300 shares of stock for a total of $327,000. GWRI’s outstanding shares as of September 30, 2015 are 181,449 compared to 182,050 as of December 31, 2014. The Company repurchased 601 common shares held by GWRC in connection with GWRC’s repurchases under its NCIB, which reduced GWRC’s ownership interest in GWRI from 48.1% to 47.9%.

One-time Dividend—On July 28, 2015, the Company announced a special one-time cash dividend of $22.8 million or C$1.55 per share. This dividend was paid out on August 12, 2015 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 7, 2015.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB) issued Auditing Standard Update (“ASU”) 2015-03,Interest—Imputation of Interest, which requires debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the associated debt liability, consistent with the accounting of debt discounts. The effects of this update are to be applied retrospectively as a change in accounting principal. ASU 2015-03 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-03 will require the Company to reclassify debt issuance costs retrospectively beginning January 1, 2016. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this guidance may have on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17,Income Taxes, which requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in the classified statement of financial position. The purpose of this update is to simplify the presentation of deferred liabilities and assets. For public business entities, ASU 2015-17 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. For private companies, the ASU is effective for financial statements for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company is currently assessing the impact this guidance may have on our consolidated financial statements.

2.REGULATORY DECISION AND RELATED ACCOUNTING AND POLICY CHANGES

Our regulated utilities and certain other balances are subject to regulation by the Commission and are therefore subject to ASC Topic 980,Regulated Operations (“ASC Topic 980”).

In accordance with ASC Topic 980, rates charged to utility customers are intended to recover the costs of the provision of service plus a reasonable return in the same period. Initial rates are set by the ACC at the time the Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (“CC&N”) is established for an area granting the utility the exclusive right to serve. The initial rates are determined based on an application submitted by us that includes anticipated customer counts and required infrastructure with rates set to achieve a rate of return on equity invested in the utility. Changes in rates, if any, are made through further formal rate applications.

-F-37-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)

On July 11, 2012, we filed rate applications with the ACC to adjust the revenue requirements for seven utilities representing a collective rate increase of approximately 28% over 2011’s revenue. In August 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with ACC Staff, the Residential Utility Consumers Office, the City of Maricopa, and other parties to the rate case. The settlement required approval by the ACC’s Commissioners before it could take effect. In February 2014, the rate case proceedings were completed and the ACC issued Rate Decision No. 74364. The rulings of the decision include, but are not limited to, the following:

For the Company’s utilities, adjusting for the condemnation of Valencia, a collective revenue requirement increase of $4.0 million based on 2011 test year service connections, phased-in over time, with the first increase implemented in January 2015 as follows (in thousands of US$):


F-24

   Incremental   Cumulative 

2015

  $1,285    $1,285  

2016

   1,089     2,374  

2017

   335     2,709  

2018

   335     3,044  

2019

   335     3,379  

2020

   335     3,714  

2021

   335     4,049  

Whereas this phase-in of additional revenues was determined using a 2011 test year, to the extent that the number of active service connections increases from 2011 levels, the additional revenues may be greater than the amounts set forth above.

Full reversal of the imputation of contributions in aid of construction (“CIAC”) associated with funds previously received under Infrastructure Coordination and Financing Agreements (“ICFAs”), as required in the Company’s last rate case. The reversal restores rate base or future rate base, and has a significant impact of restoring shareholder equity on the balance sheet.

The Company has agreed to not enter into any new ICFAs. Existing ICFAs will remain in place, but a portion of future payments to be received under the ICFAs will be considered as hook-up fees, which are accounted for as CIAC once expended on plant.

A 9.5% return on common equity will be adopted.

None of the Company’s utilities will file another rate application before May 31, 2016. GWRI’s subsidiaries, Santa Cruz Water Company (“Santa Cruz”) and Palo Verde Utilities Company (“Palo Verde”) may not file for another rate increase before May 31, 2017.

The following provides additional discussion on accounting and policy changes resulting from Rate Decision No. 74364.

Infrastructure Coordination and Financing Agreements—ICFAs are agreements with developers and homebuilders whereby the GWRI parent company, which owns the operating utilities, provides services to plan, coordinate and finance the water and wastewater infrastructure that would otherwise be required to be performed or subcontracted by the developer or homebuilder.

Under the ICFAs, GWRI has a contractual obligation to ensure physical capacity exists through its regulated utilities for water and wastewater to the landowner/developer when needed. This obligation persists regardless of connection growth. Fees for these services are typically a negotiated amount per equivalent dwelling unit for the specified development or portion of land. Payments are generally due in installments, with a portion due upon signing of the agreement, a portion due upon completion of certain milestones, and the final payment due upon final plat approval or sale of the subdivision. The payments are non-refundable.

-F-38-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)

The agreements are generally recorded as a lien against the land and must be assumed in the event of a sale or transfer. The regional planning and coordination of the infrastructure in the various service areas has been an important part of GWRI’s business model.

Prior to January 1, 2010, GWRI accounted for funds received under ICFAs as revenue once the obligations specified in the ICFA were met. As these arrangements are with developers and not with the end water or wastewater customer, the timing of revenue recognition coincided with the completion of GWRI’s performance obligations under the agreement with the developer and with GWRI’s ability to provide fitted capacity for water and wastewater service through its regulated subsidiaries.

The 2010 Regulatory Rate Decision established new rates for the recovery of reasonable costs incurred by the utilities and a return on invested capital. In determining the new annual revenue requirement, the ACC imputed a reduction to rate base for all amounts related to ICFA funds collected by the Company that the ACC deemed to be CIAC for rate making purposes. As a result of the decision by the ACC, GWRI changed its accounting policy for the accounting of ICFA funds. Effective January 1, 2010, GWRI recorded ICFA funds received as CIAC. Thereafter, the ICFA-related CIAC was amortized as a reduction of depreciation expense over the estimated depreciable life of the utility plant at the related utilities. The balance of ICFA-related CIAC, net of accumulated amortization, totaled approximately $64.1 million as of December 31, 2013.

With the issuance of Rate Decision No. 74364 in February 2014, the ACC changed how ICFA funds would be characterized and accounted for going forward. Most notably, ICFA funds would no longer be CIAC. ICFA funds which were already received or which had become due prior to the date of Rate Decision No. 74364 would be accounted for in accordance with the Company’s ICFA revenue recognition policy that had been in place prior to the 2010 Regulatory Rate Decision. For ICFA funds to be received in the future, Rate Decision No. 74364 prescribes that 70% of ICFA funds to be received by the Company will be recorded in the associated utility subsidiary as a hook up fee (“HUF”) liability, with the remaining 30% to be recorded as deferred revenue, to be accounted for in accordance with the Company’s ICFA revenue recognition policy.

The Company intends to account for the portion allocated to the HUF as a contribution, similar to CIAC. However, from the regulator’s perspective, the HUF is not technically CIAC and does not impact rate base until the related funds are expended. Such funds will be segregated in a separate bank account and used for plant. A HUF liability will be established and will be relieved once the HUF funds are utilized for the construction of plant. For facilities required under a HUF or ICFA, the utilities must first use the HUF moneys received, after which, it may use debt or equity financing for the remainder of construction. The Company will record the 30% as deferred revenue, which is to be recognized as revenue once the obligations specified within the ICFA are met. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, ICFA deferred revenue recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheets totaled $19.7 million.

Regulatory asset—Under ASC Topic 980, rate regulated entities defer costs and credits on the balance sheet as regulatory assets and liabilities when it is probable that these costs and credits will be recognized in the rate making process in a period different from the period in which they would have been reflected in income by an unregulated company. Certain costs associated with our rate cases have been deferred on our balance sheet as regulatory assets as approved by the ACC. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had one regulatory asset in the amount of $255,000 and $400,000, respectively, related to costs incurred in connection with our most recent rate case. This amount began to amortize in January 2015, and will be amortized over a three year life, which period is aligned with the phase-in of a majority of the new rates provided by Rate Decision No. 74364. In addition, there was a decrease of approximately $50,000 in the regulatory asset associated with the condemnation of Valencia.

Intangible assets / Regulatory liability—The Company had previously recorded certain intangible assets related to ICFA contracts obtained in connection with our Santa Cruz, Palo Verde and Sonoran Utility

-F-39-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)

Services (“Sonoran”) acquisitions. The intangible assets represented the benefits to be received over time by virtue of having those contracts. Prior to January 1, 2010, the ICFA-related intangibles were amortized when ICFA funds were recognized as revenue. Effective January 1, 2010, in connection with the 2010 Regulatory Rate Decision, these assets became fully offset by a regulatory liability of $11.2 million since the imputation of ICFA funds as CIAC effectively resulted in the Company not being able to benefit (through rates) from the acquired ICFA contracts. At September 30, 2015 this is the sole regulatory liability.

Effective January 1, 2010, the gross ICFAs intangibles began to be amortized when cash was received in proportion to the amount of total cash expected to be received under the underlying agreements. However, such amortization expense was offset by a corresponding reduction of the regulatory liability in the same amount.

As a result of Rate Decision No. 74364, the Company changed its policy around the ICFA related intangible assets. As discussed above, pursuant to Rate Decision No. 74364, approximately 70% of ICFA funds to be received in the future will be recorded as a HUF at the Company’s applicable utility subsidiary. The remaining approximate 30% of future ICFA funds will be recorded at the parent company level and will be subject to the Company’s ICFA revenue recognition accounting policy. As the Company now expects to experience an economic benefit from the 30% portion of future ICFA funds, 30% of the regulatory liability, or $3.4 million, was reversed during the first quarter of 2014. The remaining 70% of the sole regulatory liability, or $7.9 million, will continue to be recorded on the balance sheet. Subsequent to Rate Decision No. 74364, the ICFA-related intangibles will once again be amortized when ICFA funds are recognized as revenue.

The intangible assets will continue to amortize when the corresponding ICFA funds are received in proportion to the amount of total cash expected to be received under the underlying agreements. Nevertheless, whereas 70% of the regulatory liability remains recorded, the recognition of amortization expense will be reduced since the intangible assets amortization expense will be partially offset by a corresponding reduction of the regulatory liability.

3.PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 consist of the following (in thousands of US$):

  September 30,
2015
  December 31,
2014
  Average
Depreciation Life
(in years)

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:

   

Mains/lines/sewers

 $111,091   $138,116   47

Plant

  64,490    79,983   25

Equipment

  27,938    44,286   10

Meters

  4,150    6,336   12

Furniture, fixture and leasehold improvements

  378    430   8

Computer and office equipment

  973    1,006   5

Software

  178    163   3

Land and land rights

  752    986   

Other

  150    139   

Construction work-in-process

  45,913    47,550   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total property, plant and equipment

  256,013    318,995   

Less accumulated depreciation

  (62,402  (78,571 
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net property, plant and equipment

 $193,611   $240,424   
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

-F-40-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)

4.ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 consist of the following (in thousands of US$):

   September 30, 2015   December 31, 2014 

Billed receivables

  $1,476    $1,523  

Less allowance for doubtful accounts

   (177   (158
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accounts receivable—net

  $1,299    $1,365  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table summarizes the allowance for doubtful accounts activity as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and for the year ended December 31, 2014 (in thousands of US$):

   September 30, 2015   December 31, 2014 

Beginning balance

  $(158  $(102

Allowance additions

   (20   (92

Write-offs

   11     57  

Recoveries

   (10   (21
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

  $(177  $(158
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

5.EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENT AND CONVERTIBLE NOTE

On June 5, 2013, the Company sold Global Water Management, LLC (“GWM”) to an investor group led by a private equity firm that specializes in the water industry. GWR was a wholly-owned subsidiary of GWRI that owned and operated the FATHOM business. In connection with the sale of GWM, the Company made an investment in the FATHOM Partnership. This limited partnership investment is accounted for under the equity method due to our investment being considered more than minor, and consisted of a balance of $938,000 as of September 30, 2015 and $1.2 million as of December 31, 2014.

The original investment in FATHOM consisted of an investment of $750,000 in the Series A preferred units and $98,000 of common units. Additionally, GWRI invested $750,000 in a 10% convertible promissory note of GWM with an original maturity of December 31, 2014. We accounted for this investment in accordance with relevant accounting guidance for debt and equity securities which requires the fair value measurement of the investment pursuant to ASC Topic 820,Fair Value Measurement. The fair value of the investment in the convertible notes at initial recognition was determined using the transaction price, of which the price paid by the Company was consistent with the price paid by third party investors for comparable convertible notes.

In November 2014, FATHOM experienced a qualified financing event (qualified financing was defined as an equity financing by FATHOM Partnership in which FATHOM Partnership sells its units for at least $1.75 per unit and the aggregate proceeds from such financing was at least $15 million, exclusive of convertible note amounts converted). At the time of the qualified financing, the convertible promissory note was converted into Series B preferred units, and accounted for under the equity method. The Company’s resulting ownership of common and preferred units represented an approximate 8.0% ownership (on a fully diluted basis).

In conjunction with the qualified financing, our equity interest in the Series A and Series B preferred shares were adjusted in accordance with ASC 323, wherein we recorded a gain of $1.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2014. The adjustment to the carrying value of our investments was calculated using our proportionate share of FATHOM’s adjusted net equity. The gain was recorded within other income and expense in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.

-F-41-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)

We evaluate our investment in FATHOM Partnership/GWM for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our investment may have experienced an “other-than-temporary” decline in value. Since the sale of GWM, the losses incurred on the investment were greater than anticipated; however, based upon our evaluation of various relevant factors, including the recent equity event, the ability of FATHOM to achieve and sustain an earnings capacity that would justify the carrying amount of our investment, as of September 30, 2015 we do not believe the investment to be impaired.

We have evaluated whether GWM qualifies as a variable interest entity (“VIE”) pursuant to the accounting guidance of ASC 810,Consolidations. Considering the potential that the total equity investment in FATHOM Partnership/GWM may not be sufficient to absorb the losses of FATHOM, we believe it is currently appropriate to view GWM as a VIE. However, considering GWRI’s minority interest and limited involvement with the FATHOM business, the Company would not be required to consolidate the financial statements of GWM. Rather, we have accounted for our investment under the equity method.

6.GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The carrying value of goodwill was zero as of September 30, 2015. With the condemnation of Valencia, $12.7 million of goodwill was written off. An impairment of $176,000 was recorded against the goodwill recorded in the Willow Valley reporting unit during 2015, to bring its carrying value down to $223,000, which balance was reclassified as held for sale as of September 30, 2015.

The carrying value of goodwill was $13.1 million as of December 31, 2014, which included balances of $12.7 million and $398,000 in the Valencia and Willow Valley reporting units, respectively.

Intangible assets at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 consisted of the following (in thousands of US$):

  September 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
  Gross
Amount
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net
Amount
  Gross
Amount
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net
Amount
 

INDEFINITE LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS:

      

CP Water CC&N service area

 $1,532   $—     $1,532   $1,532   $—     $1,532  

Intangible trademark

  13    —      13    13    —      13  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  1,545    —      1,545    1,545    —      1,545  

AMORTIZED INTANGIBLE ASSETS:

      

Acquired ICFAs

  17,978    (12,154  5,824    17,978    (12,154  5,824  

Sonoran contract rights

  7,406    (2,003  5,403    7,406    (2,003  5,403  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  25,384    (14,157  11,227    25,384    (14,157  11,227  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total intangible assets

 $26,929   $(14,157 $12,772   $26,929   $(14,157 $12,772  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Acquired ICFAs and Sonoran contract rights are amortized when cash is received in proportion to the amount of total cash expected to be received under the underlying agreements. Due to the uncertainty of the timing of when cash will be received under ICFA agreements and contract rights, we cannot reliably estimate when the remaining intangible assets’ amortization will be recorded.

7.TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES

We provide medical benefits to our employees through our participation in a pooled plan sponsored by an affiliate of a shareholder and director of the Company. Medical claims paid to the plan were approximately $306,000 and $407,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

-F-42-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)

GWRC was organized in 2010 and currently holds an approximate 47.9% interest in the Company. GWRI provides for the ongoing management and general administration of GWRC’s business affairs pursuant to a management agreement between GWRC and GWRI to provide such services. Accordingly, GWRC is economically dependent on the Company. Services provided by the Company under the management agreement are provided at no charge to GWRC, and are not monetarily significant. However, GWRC does incur certain costs not covered by the management agreement. These include GWRC’s accounting fees, listing fees and other costs directly associated with operating as a publicly traded company. Whereas GWRC does not expect to generate cash flows from operating activities, the operating costs incurred by GWRC are paid by the Company. Amounts paid by GWRI on GWRC’s behalf during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 totaled $678,000 and $431,000, respectively. The Company accounts for such payments as equity distributions to GWRC.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company provided cash advances of $12.7 million to satisfy GWRC’s short term cash obligations. The amount advanced is utilized to fund GWRC’s monthly dividend and other cash requirements, as needed. The residual balance of the cash advance is presented on the Company’s September 30, 2015 balance sheet in due from related party. The related party balance will be reduced upon dividend declaration, when the amount declared is presented as a reduction in equity. As of September 30, 2015, the balance of the advance was $508,000.

GWM has historically provided billing, customer service and other support services for the Company’s regulated utilities. Amounts collected by GWM from the Company’s customers that GWM has not yet remitted to the Company are included within the ‘due from related party’ caption on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet. As of September 30, 2015, the unremitted balance totaled $265,000. Notwithstanding the sale of GWM on June 5, 2013, FATHOM will continue to provide these services to the Company’s regulated utilities under a long-term service agreement. Based on current service connections, we estimate that fees to be paid to GWM for FATHOM services will be $7.72 per water account/month, which is an annual rate of approximately $1.8 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred FATHOM service fees of approximately $1.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively.

The Company is entitled to quarterly royalty payments based on a percentage of certain of GWM’s recurring revenues. These royalty payments will continue over a 10-year period subsequent to the sale of GWM, up to a maximum of $15.0 million. The Company made the election to record these quarterly royalty payments prospectively in income as the amounts are earned. Royalties recorded within other income totaled approximately $240,000 and $197,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

As part of the condemnation of Valencia the Company paid FATHOM $74,000 for consulting services rendered in relation to the transfer of customer data to Buckeye.

8.ACCRUED LIABILIITIES

Accrued liabilities at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 consist of the following (in thousands of US$):

   September 30, 2015   December 31, 2014 

Deferred compensation

  $416    $1,551  

Interest

   2,627     1,066  

Property taxes

   1,478     1,038  

Other accrued liabilities

   3,523     3,177  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total accrued liabilities

  $8,044    $6,832  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

-F-43-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)

9.DEBT

The outstanding balances and maturity dates for short-term (including the current portion of long-term debt) and long-term debt as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are as follows (in thousands of US$):

  September 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
  Short-term  Long-term  Short-term  Long-term 

BONDS PAYABLE—

    

5.450% Series 2006, maturing December 1, 2017

 $930   $2,025   $930   $2,025  

5.600% Series 2006, maturing December 1, 2022

  —      6,215    —      6,215  

5.750% Series 2006, maturing December 1, 2032

  —      23,370    —      23,370  

6.550% Series 2007, maturing December 1, 2037—net of unamortized discount of $343 and $359 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively

  660    50,872    660    50,856  

6.375% Series 2008, maturing December 1, 2018

  185    635    185    635  

7.500% Series 2008, maturing December 1, 2038

  —      23,235    —      23,235  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  1,775    106,352    1,775    106,336  

TERM LOAN—

    

LIBOR plus 3.00% MidFirst Term Loan, maturing November 10, 2024

  —      —      788    20,929  

OTHER LOANS—

    

Capital lease obligations

  108    206    90    226  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total debt

 $1,883   $106,558   $2,653   $127,491  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Tax Exempt Bonds—We issued tax exempt bonds through The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima in the amount of $36,495,000 on December 28, 2006; $53,624,000, net of a discount of $511,000, on November 19, 2007; and $24,550,000 on October 1, 2008. The Series 2006, 2007 and 2008 bonds have interest payable semiannually on the first of June and December. Recurring payments of principal are payable annually on the first of December for the Series 2006, 2007 and 2008 Bonds. Proceeds from these bonds were used for qualifying costs of constructing and equipping the water and wastewater treatment facilities of our subsidiaries, Palo Verde and Santa Cruz. The Company has not granted any deed of trust, mortgage, or other lien on property of Santa Cruz or Palo Verde. These bonds are secured by a security agreement that gives the trustee rights to the net operating income generated by our Santa Cruz and Palo Verde utilities. The tax exempt bonds require we maintain a minimum debt service coverage ratio of 1.10:1.00, tested annually based on the combined operating results of our Santa Cruz and Palo Verde utilities.

MidFirst Term Loan—In November 2014, we secured a $21.8 million term loan from MidFirst bank (“MidFirst Term Loan”). Principal and interest were paid monthly with payments calculated using a 20 year amortization schedule. The MidFirst Term Loan accrued interest at a variable rate of LIBOR plus 300 basis points. The note was collateralized with a security interest from customer payments for the remaining utilities included within West Maricopa Combine, Inc. The note had a maturity date in November 2024, but was retired early in July 2015 with proceeds received from the condemnation of Valencia, at which time we incurred and paid a prepayment penalty of approximately $213,000.

-F-44-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)

At September 30, 2015, the remaining aggregate annual maturities of our debt and minimum lease payments under capital lease obligations for the years ended December 31 are as follows (in thousands of US$):

   Debt   Capital Lease
Obligations
 

2015

  $1,775    $33  

2016

   1,885     127  

2017

   1,995     103  

2018

   2,120     68  

2019

   2,480     20  

Thereafter

   98,215     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Subtotal

  $108,470    $351  

Less: amount representing interest

   —       (37
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $108,470    $314  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

At September 30, 2015, the carrying value of the non-current portion of long-term debt was $106.6 million, with an estimated fair value of $121.4 million. At December 31, 2014, the carrying value of the non-current portion of long-term debt was $127.5 million, with an estimated fair value of $143.1 million. The fair value of our debt was estimated based on interest rates considered available for instruments of similar terms and remaining maturities.

10.INCOME TAXES

The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

ASC Topic 740,Income Taxes, prescribes the method to determine whether a deferred tax asset is realizable and significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified. During 2012, as a result of the cumulative losses experienced over the prior three years, which under the accounting standard represented significant objective negative evidence and prohibited the Company from considering projected income, we concluded that a full valuation allowance should be recorded against our net deferred tax assets. As a result of the additional revenues expected to be provided by Rate Decision No. 74364, as well as other factors, the Company reevaluated its deferred income taxes and determined that sufficient evidence now exists that the majority of the Company’s net deferred tax assets will be utilized in the future. Accordingly, during 2014, the Company reversed substantially all of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $35.8 million recorded as of December 31, 2013. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the valuation allowance totaled $9,000, which relates to state net operating loss carryforwards expected to expire prior to utilization.

-F-45-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)

The following table summarizes the Company’s temporary differences between book and tax accounting that give rise to the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, including the valuation allowance, as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (in thousands of US$):

   September 30, 2015   December 31, 2014 

DEFERRED TAX ASSETS:

    

Taxable meter deposits

  $48    $711  

Net operating loss carry forwards

   5,060     4,785  

Balterra intangible asset acquisition

   336     336  

Deferred gain on Sale of GWM

   919     921  

Deferred gain on ICFA funds received

   7,364     7,364  

Regulatory liability related to intangible assets

   2,933     2,933  

Equity investment loss

   290     210  

Property, plant and equipment

   1,514     1,669  

Other

   409     761  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

   18,873     19,690  

Valuation allowance

   (9   (9
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net deferred tax asset

   18,864     19,681  

DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES:

    

CP Water intangible asset acquisition

   (572   (572

ICFA intangible asset

   (2,439   (2,712

Gain on condemnation of Valencia

   (20,323   0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

   (23,334   (3,284

Net deferred tax asset (liability)

  $(4,470  $16,397  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

As of September 30, 2015, we have approximately $13.9 million in federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carry forwards and $10.4 million in state NOLs available to offset future taxable income, with the NOLs expiring in 2029-2033 for the federal return and expiring in 2014-2033 for the state return (effective for the 2012 tax year and thereafter, state NOLs for the state of Arizona expire after 20 years).

11.DEFERRED COMPENSATION AWARDS

Stock-based compensation—Stock-based compensation related to option awards is measured based on the fair value of the award. The fair value of stock option awards was determined using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. We recognized compensation expense associated with the options over the vesting period.

At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there were options to acquire 431 shares of common stock of GWRI outstanding. The options were all vested and exercisable at December 31, 2014. The stock options have a remaining contractual life of approximately 3.00 years and have an exercise price of $870.66 per share.

GWRC stock option grant—In January 2012, GWRC’s Board of Directors granted options to acquire 385,697 GWRC common shares to nine employees of GWRI in lieu of paying cash bonuses for 2011. The options vested in equal installments over the eight quarters of 2012 and 2013, with exercise prices of C$7.50 and C$4.00 per share and expire four years after the date of issuance. We accounted for the GWRC stock option grant in accordance with ASC 323,Investment-Equity Method & Joint Ventures. The Company remeasured the fair value of the award at the end of each period until the options became fully vested on December 31, 2013.

In the third quarter of 2015, 59,636 GWRC options were exercised by two individuals. As of September 30, 2015, 209,591 GWRC options were outstanding compared to 269,227 as of December 31, 2014. Total GWRC stock options forfeited due to attrition or the sale of GWM totaled 116,470.

-F-46-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)

No stock-based compensation expense was recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 or September 30, 2014.

Phantom stock compensation—On December 30, 2010, we adopted a phantom stock unit plan authorizing the directors of the Company to issue phantom stock units (“PSUs”) to our employees. The value of the PSUs issued under the plan tracks the performance of GWRC’s shares and gives rise to a right of the holder to receive a cash payment the value of which, on a particular date, will be the market value of the equivalent number of shares of GWRC at that date. The issuance of PSUs as a core component of employee compensation is intended to strengthen the alignment of interests between the employees of the Company and the shareholders of GWRC by linking their holdings and a portion of their compensation to the future value of the common shares of GWRC.

On December 30, 2010, 350,000 PSUs were issued to members of management, with an initial value of approximately $2.6 million. The PSUs were accounted for as liability compensatory awards under ASC 710,Compensation—General, rather than as equity awards. The PSU awards were remeasured each period based on the present value of the benefits expected to be provided to the employee upon vesting, which benefits are based on GWRC’s share price multiplied by the number of units. The present value of the benefits was recorded as expense in the Company’s financial statements over the related vesting period. The December 30, 2010 PSUs vested at the end of four years from the date of their issuance. There is no exercise price attached to PSU awards. The value of the PSUs, $1.3 million, was paid to the holders in January 2015.

In January 2012, 135,079 additional PSUs were issued to nine members of management as a reward for performance in 2011. The PSUs issued to management vested ratably over 12 consecutive quarters beginning January 1, 2012 and were accounted for as liability compensatory awards similar to the PSUs issued in December 2010. These PSUs were remeasured each period and a liability was recorded equal to GWRC’s closing share price on the period end date multiplied by the number of units vested. The remaining value of the PSUs, $38,000, was paid to the holders in January 2015.

During the first quarter of 2013, 76,492 PSUs were issued to nine members of management as a reward for performance in 2012. The PSUs issued to management vest ratably over 12 consecutive quarters beginning January 1, 2013 and are accounted for as liability compensatory awards similar to the PSUs issued in December 2010 and January 2012. These PSUs are remeasured each period and a liability is recorded equal to GWRC’s closing share price on the period end date multiplied by the number of units vested. As of September 30, 2015, 10,957 of these PSUs remain outstanding. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, $83,000, was paid to holders for vested PSUs.

During the first quarter of 2014, 8,775 PSUs were issued to three members of management as a reward for performance in 2013. These PSUs vest ratably over 12 consecutive quarters beginning January 1, 2014. As of September 30, 2015, 2,228 of these PSUs remain outstanding. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, $6,000, was paid to holders for vested PSUs.

During the first quarter of 2015, 28,828 PSUs were issued to two members of management as a reward for performance in 2014. These PSUs vest ratably over 12 consecutive quarters beginning January 1, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, 24,024 of these PSUs remain outstanding. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, $26,000, was paid to holders for vested PSUs.

Stock appreciation rights compensation—In January 2012, in an effort to reward employees for their performance in 2011 as well as to recognize performance since 2007, the last year the Company paid bonuses, we adopted a stock appreciation rights plan authorizing the directors of the Company to issue stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) to our employees. The value of the SARs issued under the plan track the performance of GWRC’s shares. Each holder of the January 2012 award has the right to receive a cash payment amounting to the difference between C$4.00 per share exercise price and the closing price of

-F-47-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)

GWRC’s common shares on the exercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of C$4.00 per share. In total, 152,091 SARs were issued to employees below the senior management level, and 1,023 remained outstanding as of September 30, 2015. The SARs vested in equal installments over the four quarters of 2012 and expire four years after the date of issuance. Holders of SARs may exercise their awards once they have vested. Individuals who voluntarily or involuntarily leave the Company forfeit their rights under the awards. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, $67,000, was paid to holders for vested SARs.

SARs are accounted for as liability compensatory awards under ASC 710,Compensation—General, rather than as equity awards. The 2012 SAR awards are remeasured each period based on GWRC’s share price relative to the C$4.00 per share exercise price. To the extent that GWRC’s share price exceeds C$4.00 per share, a liability will be recorded in other accrued liabilities in the Company’s financial statements representing the present value of the benefits expected to be provided to the employee upon exercise.

In the third quarter of 2013, the Company granted 100,000 SARs to a key executive of the Company. These SARs vest ratably over 16 quarters from the grant date and give the employee the right to receive a cash payment amounting to the difference between the C$2.00 per share exercise price and the closing price of GWRC’s common shares on the exercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of C$2.00 per share. The exercise price was determined by taking the weighted average share price of the five days prior to July 1, 2013. As of September 30, 2015, 92,500 of these SARs remain outstanding. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, $37,000, was paid to the holder for vested SARs.

In the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company granted 100,000 SARs to a newly hired officer of the Company. These SARs vest ratably over 16 quarters from the grant date and give the employee the right to receive a cash payment amounting to the difference between the C$3.38 per share exercise price and the closing price of GWRC’s common shares on the exercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of C$3.38 per share. The exercise price was determined by taking the weighted average share price of the 30 days prior to November 14, 2013. As of September 30, 2015, 100,000 of these SARs remain outstanding.

In the first quarter of 2015, the Company granted 299,000 SARs to seven members of management. These SARs vest ratably over 16 quarters from the grant date and give the employee the right to receive a cash payment amounting to the difference between the C$5.35 per share exercise price and the closing price of GWRC’s common shares on the exercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of C$5.35 per share. The exercise price was determined to be the fair market value of one share of stock on the grant date of February 11, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, 299,000 of these SARs remain outstanding.

In the second quarter of 2015, the Company granted 300,000 SARs to two key executives of the Company. These SARs vest over 16 quarters, vesting 20% per year for the first three years, with the remainder vesting in year four. The SARs give the employee the right to receive a cash payment amounting to the difference between the C$6.44 per share exercise price and the closing price of GWRC’s common shares on the exercise date, provided that the closing price is in excess of C$6.44 per share. The exercise price was determined to be the fair market value of one share of stock on the grant date of May 8, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, 300,000 of these SARs remain outstanding.

-F-48-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) (Continued)

The Company recorded approximately $430,000 and $1.0 million of compensation expense related to the PSUs and SARs for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively. Based on GWRC’s closing share price on September 30, 2015 deferred compensation expense to be recognized over future periods is estimated for the years ending December 31 as follows (in thousands of US$):

   PSU   SARs 

2015

  $41    $18  

2016

   54     222  

2017

   47     164  

2018

   —       80  

2019

   —       10  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $142    $494  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

12.SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

The following is supplemental cash flow information for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands of US$):

   Nine Months Ended September 30, 
           2015                   2014         

Cash paid for interest

  $3,946    $4,135  

Capital expenditures included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

   429     70  

13.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments—The Company leases certain office space from GWM for approximately $5,000 per month. Rent expense arising from the operating leases totaled approximately $49,000 and $53,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

See also Note 7 regarding our commitment to provide services to GWRC.

Contingencies—From time to time, we may become involved in proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Management believes the ultimate resolution of such matters will not materially affect our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

14.SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent events have been evaluated up to and including January 19, 2016, the date of this report.

Subsequent to September 30, 2015, GWRC continued to repurchase, for cancellation, common shares of GWRC pursuant to the NCIB approved in May 2015. During this time, GWRC repurchased an additional 28,800 shares on the open market, for a total of approximately $152,000. The Company repurchased 270 common shares held by GWRC in connection with GWRC’s repurchases under its NCIB. The NCIB was completed on December 30, 2015.

* * * * * *

-F-49-


UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the nine months ended September 30, 2015 are presented to give effect to the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Corporate Transactions—Stipulated Condemnation of Valencia” as if the transaction was completed as of January 1, 2014. An unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2015 has also been presented to give effect to the Reorganization Transaction as described in this prospectus. The condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia has been omitted from the balance sheet adjustments as the transaction is reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2015 included elsewhere in this prospectus.

The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements are derived from our audited consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 and our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which are included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based on currently available information and assumptions that management believes are reasonable, factually supportable, directly attributable and, as it relates to the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations, will have a continuing impact. The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information does not purport to represent our consolidated financial position or results of operations that would have occurred had the transactions been consummated on the date assumed or to project our consolidated financial position or results of operations for any future date or period. The presentation of the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information is prepared in conformity with Article 11 of Regulation S-X.

The unaudited pro forma adjustments related to the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia and the Reorganization Transaction are described in the notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information.

The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information should be read together with “Reorganization Transaction,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.

-F-50-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

As of September 30, 2015

(Unaudited)

  Historical  Pro Forma
Adjustments
  Pro Forma,
As Adjusted
 

ASSETS

   

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:

   

Property, plant and equipment

 $256,013   $—     $256,013  

Less accumulated depreciation

  (62,402  —      (62,402
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net property, plant and equipment

  193,611    —      193,611  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

CURRENT ASSETS:

   

Cash and cash equivalents

  16,767    683(1)   17,450  

Accounts receivable—net

  1,299    —      1,299  

Due from related party

  773    (508)(2)   265  

Accrued revenue

  1,871    —      1,871  

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  890    —      890  

Deferred tax assets—current

  1,514    —      1,514  

Assets held for sale

  2,887    —      2,887  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current assets

  26,001    175    26,176  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OTHER ASSETS:

   

Goodwill

  —      —      —    

Intangible assets—net

  12,772    —      12,772  

Regulatory assets

  255    —      255  

Deposits

  13    —      13  

Bond service fund and other restricted cash

  9,042    —      9,042  

Debt issuance costs—net

  2,276    —      2,276  

Equity method investment—related party

  938    —      938  

Deferred tax assets

  —      —      —    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other assets

  25,296    —      25,296  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

 $244,908   $175   $245,083  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

   

Accounts payable

 $1,356   $—     $1,356  

Accrued expenses

  8,044    183(1)   8,227  

Deferred revenue—current portion

  9    —      9  

Customer and meter deposits

  1,691    —      1,691  

Long-term debt—current portion

  1,883    —      1,883  

Liabilities held for sale

  503    —      503  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

  13,486    183    13,669  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NONCURRENT LIABILITIES:

   

Long-term debt

  106,558    —      106,558  

Deferred regulatory gain

  19,730    —      19,730  

Regulatory liability

  7,859    —      7,859  

Advances in aid of construction

  60,070    —      60,070  

Contributions in aid of construction—net

  4,473    —      4,473  

Acquisition liability

  4,688    —      4,688  

Deferred income tax liability

  5,984    —      5,984  

Other noncurrent liabilities

  209    236(1)   445  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total noncurrent liabilities

  209,571    236    209,807  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  223,057    419    223,476  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (see Note 13)

   

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

   

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 181,449 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015; Pro forma common stock, $0.0001 par value, 60,000,000 shares authorized, 18,268,939 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2015.

  2    (1)(1)   1  

Treasury stock, at cost

  —      1(1)   1  

Paid in capital

  23,417    (244)(1)   23,173  

Accumulated deficit

  (1,568  —      (1,568
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total shareholders’ equity

  21,851    (244  21,607  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 $244,908   $175   $245,083  
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

-F-51-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

For the Year Ended December 31, 2014

(Unaudited)

   Historical  Pro Forma
Adjustments
  Pro Forma, As
Adjusted
 

REVENUES:

    

Water services

  $18,076   $(5,862)(3)  $12,214  

Wastewater and recycled water services

   14,112    —      14,112  

Unregulated revenues

   371    —      371  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

   32,559    (5,862  26,697  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

    

Operations and maintenance

   8,020    (1,928)(3)   6,092  

Operations and maintenance—related party

   2,398    (610)(3)   1,788  

General and administrative

   8,809    (130)(4)   8,679  

Gain on regulatory order

   (50,664  —      (50,664

Depreciation

   9,205    (2,034)(3)   7,171  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

   (22,232  (4,702  (26,934
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OPERATING INCOME

   54,791    (1,160  53,631  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):

    

Interest income

   79    —      79  

Interest expense

   (9,512  —      (9,512

Other

   2,162    (66)(3)   2,096  

Other—related party

   416    —      416  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other income (expense)

   (6,855  (66  (6,921
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

   47,936    (1,226  46,710  

INCOME TAX BENEFIT

   16,995    465(3)   17,460  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET INCOME

  $64,931   $(761 $64,170  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

  $356.67    $3.50(5)(6) 

Diluted earnings per common share

  $356.67    $3.50(5)(6) 

Dividends declared per common share

  C$22.40    C$0.22  

Dividends declared per common share

  $20.49    $0.20  

Weighted average number of common shares used in the determination of:

    

Basic earnings per common share

   182,050     18,329,441(6) 

Diluted earnings per common share

   182,050     18,329,441(6) 

-F-52-


GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.

PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015

(Unaudited)

   Historical  Pro Forma
Adjustments
  Pro Forma, As
Adjusted
 

REVENUES:

    

Water services

  $13,138   $(3,266)(3)  $9,872  

Wastewater and recycled water services

   11,243    —      11,243  

Unregulated revenues

   466    —      466  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total revenues

   24,847    (3,266  21,581  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

    

Operations and maintenance

   5,607    (905)(3)   4,702  

Operations and maintenance—related party

   1,712    (330)(3)   1,382  

General and administrative

   5,891    (135)(4)   5,756  

Gain on regulatory order

   —      —      —    

Depreciation

   6,526    (1,257)(3)   5,269  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

   19,736    (2,627  17,109  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OPERATING INCOME

   5,111    (639  4,472  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):

    

Gain on condemnation of Valencia

   43,074    (43,074)(7)   —    

Interest income

   8    —      8  

Interest expense

   (6,496  —      (6,496

Other

   564    (2)(3)   562  

Other—related party

   29    —      29  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total other income (expense)

   37,179    (43,076  (5,897
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES

   42,290    (43,715  (1,425

INCOME TAX (EXPENSE) BENEFIT

   (20,897  21,407(7)   510  
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

NET INCOME (LOSS)

  $21,393   $(22,308 $(915
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share

  $117.63    $(0.05)(5)(6) 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share

  $117.63    $(0.05)(5)(6) 

Dividends declared per common share

  C$178.69    C$1.77(6) 

Dividends declared per common share

  $137.55    $1.37(6) 

Weighted average number of common shares used in the determination of:

    

Basic earnings per common share

   181,860     18,310,316(6) 

Diluted earnings per common share

   181,860     18,310,316(6) 

-F-53-


Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Information

For the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2014

For the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2014

and For the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2015

1.Basis of presentation

The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2015, is based on the historical unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet for Global Water Resources, Inc., as adjusted to give effect to the Reorganization Transaction.

The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations are based on the historical audited consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 and our unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 for Global Water Resources Inc., as adjusted to give effect to the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia as if the transaction had occurred on January 1, 2014.

2.Pro forma adjustments

The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based on currently available information and assumptions that management believes are reasonable, factually supportable, directly attributable and, as it relates to the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations, will have a continuing impact. The following adjustments have been reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2015, the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

(1)Reflects the assets and liabilities assumed upon consolidation of GWRC into GWRI and the exchange of shares held by GWRC for new shares to be distributed to GWRC shareholders of record.

(2)Reflects the elimination of the cash advance provided by GWRI to GWRC. The cash advance from GWRI to GWRC was utilized to fund GWRC’s monthly dividend and other short term cash obligations.

(3)Reflects the elimination of water service revenues, operations and maintenance expense, depreciation expense, other expense and income tax expense relating to the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia. Income tax expense is calculated using the statutory rate of 38%.

(4)Reflects the elimination of general and administrative expenses relating to the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia. The general and administrative pro forma adjustments represent the elimination of direct expenses recorded at Valencia during the year ended December 31, 2014 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Certain allocated expenses were not included in the pro forma adjustments as such consolidated expenses generally remained in 2014 even after considering the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia.

(5)The adjustments to basic earnings (loss) and diluted earnings (loss) per common share reflect the net income eliminated through the pro forma adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the elimination of the net gain on the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia and the net income eliminated through the pro forma adjustments for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

(6)Reflects the adjustments to give effect to a 100.68-for-1 common stock split to occur as part of the Reorganization Transaction.

(7)With the condemnation of the operations and assets of Valencia, the Company recognized a gain on condemnation of $43.1 million which has been eliminated in the pro forma adjustments. The tax effects include adjustments recognized at the statutory rate of 38% as follows:

$16.6 million in tax expenses related to the net income eliminated through the pro forma adjustments

$4.8 million in tax expense related to a permanent adjustment to goodwill of $12.7 million


-F-54-


             Shares

LOGO

Common Stock

Prospectus

Roth Capital Partners


PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

Item 13.Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution

The following table sets forth all expenses to be paid by the Registrant in connection with the distribution of the securities being registered,Company, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, upon the completion of this offering. All amounts shown are as follows:

     
  Amount(1) 
 
Securities and Exchange Commission Registration Fee $1,965 
FINRA Filing Fee        
Nasdaq Listing Fee        
Accounting Fees and Expenses        
Blue Sky Fees and Expenses        
Legal Fees and Expenses        
Transfer Agent and Registrar Fees and Expenses        
Printing and Engraving Expenses        
Miscellaneous Fees and Expenses        
     
Total $      
estimates except for the SEC registration fee, the FINRA filing fee and the NASDAQ listing fee.

   Amount 

SEC registration fee

  $596  

FINRA filing fee

   1,700  

NASDAQ listing fee

   *  

Printing expenses

   *  

Accounting fees and expenses

   *  

Legal fees and expenses

   *  

Transfer agent and registrar fees

   *  

Miscellaneous fees

   *  
  

 

 

 

Total

  $            *  

*
(1)All amounts are estimates except the SEC filing fee, the FINRA filing fee and the Nasdaq listing fee.To be completed by amendment

Item 14.Indemnification of Directors and Officers
Under

Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) grants each corporation organized thereunder the Registrant has broad powerspower to indemnify its directorsany person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation or enterprise, against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and officers against liabilities they may incuramounts paid in such capacities, including liabilities undersettlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, other than an action by or in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The bylawsright of the Registrant (Exhibit 3.2) also provide for mandatory indemnificationcorporation, by reason of its directors and executive officers, and permissive indemnification of its employees and agents,being or having been in any such capacity, if he acted in good faith in a manner reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the fullest extent permissible under Delaware law.

Thebest interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.

Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL enables a corporation in its certificate of incorporation ofor an amendment thereto to eliminate or limit the Registrant (Exhibit 3.1) provides that thepersonal liability of its directors for monetary damages shall be eliminateda director to the fullest extent permissible under Delaware law. Pursuant to Delaware law, this includes eliminationcorporation or its stockholders of liability for monetary damages for breachviolations of the directors’director’s fiduciary duty, of care to the Registrant and its stockholders. These provisions do not eliminate the directors’ duty of care and, in appropriate circumstances, equitable remedies such as injunctive or other forms of non-monetary relief will remain available under Delaware law. In addition, each director will continue to be subject to liabilityexcept (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the Registrantcorporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or involvingthat involve intentional misconduct foror a knowing violationsviolation of law, (iii) pursuant to Section 174 of the DGCL (providing for liability of directors for unlawful payment of dividends or unlawful stock purchases or redemptions) or (iv) for any transaction from which thea director derived an improper personal benefit,benefit. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation includes a provision that eliminates the personal liability of directors for paymentmonetary damages for actions taken as a director to the fullest extent authorized by the DGCL.

The Company has entered, and intends to continue to enter, into separate indemnification agreements with its directors and executive officers to provide these directors and executive officers additional contractual assurances regarding the scope of dividends or approval of stock repurchases or redemptions that are unlawful under Delaware law. The provision also does not affect a director’s responsibilities under any other laws, such as the federal securities laws or state or federal environmental laws.

The Registrant maintains a policy of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance that insuresindemnification set forth in the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and to provide additional procedural protections. At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving a director or executive officer of the Company regarding which indemnification is sought. The underwriting agreement to be filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this registration statement will also provide for, under certain conditions, the indemnification by the underwriter of the Company and its executive officers and directors for certain liabilities arising under the Securities Act and otherwise.

II-1


The Company has obtained insurance policies under which, subject to the limitations of the policies, coverage is provided to our directors and executive officers against loss arising from claims made by reason of breach of fiduciary duty or other wrongful acts as a director or executive officer, including claims relating to public securities matters, and to the costCompany with respect to payments that may be made by the Company to these directors and executive officers pursuant to the Company’s indemnification obligations or otherwise as a matter of defense, settlement or payment of a judgment under certain circumstances.

law.

Item 15.Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
The Registrant has not issued or sold any unregistered securities during

Concurrently with the three years preceding the dateconsummation of this filing.


II-1

offering, GWRC, which currently owns approximately 47.8% of the Company’s outstanding common stock, will merge with and into the Company with the Company surviving as a Delaware corporation, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including GWRC’s shareholder approval. At the effective time of the merger, holders of GWRC’s common shares will receive one share of the Company’s common stock for each outstanding common share of GWRC. The 8,726,747 shares of our common stock to be issued in the Reorganization Transaction are expected to be issued in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act for the issuance and exchange of securities approved, after a public hearing upon the fairness of the terms and conditions of the exchange, by the Supreme Court of British Columbia, which is authorized by law to grant such approval.


Item 16.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
10

(a) Exhibits

     
Exhibit
  
Number
 
Document
 
     
 1.1 Form of Underwriting Agreement*
     
 2.1 Form of proposed Contribution Agreement between the members of Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC and Global Water Resources, Inc.
     
 2.2 Stock Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions as of December 30, 2006 among Michael Saunders and Global Water, Inc.
     
 2.3 First Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions as of January 29, 2007 among Michael Saunders and Global Water, Inc.
     
 2.4 Second Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions dated as of August 13, 2007 2006 among Michael Saunders and Global Water, Inc.
     
 2.5 CHI Construction Company/Global Water, Inc. Sale and Purchase and Partial Funding Agreement dated as of December 30, 2006 among Michael Saunders and Global Water, Inc.
     
 2.6 Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of January 23, 2004 among Global Water Resources, LLC and Phoenix Capital Partners, LLC
     
 2.7 Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of January 23, 2004 among Global Water Resources, LLC and Phoenix Utility Management, LLC
     
 2.8 Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of June 15, 2005 among Sonoran Utility Services, LLC and Global Water Resources, LLC
     
 2.9 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of March 9, 2006 among Global Water Resources, Inc. (n/k/a Global Water, Inc.) and the parties identified therein
     
 2.10 Reinstatement and Amendment Agreement dated as of June 23, 2006 among Global Water Resources, Inc. (n/k/a Global Water, Inc.) and the parties identified therein
     
 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Global Water Resources, Inc.
     
 3.2 Bylaws of Global Water Resources, Inc.*
     
 4.1 Specimen Common Stock Certificate*
     
 4.2 Trust Indenture dated as of December 1, 2006 from The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima to U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee
     
 4.3 First Supplemental Trust Indenture dated as of November 1, 2007 from The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima to U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee
     
 5.1 Opinion of Powell Goldstein LLP*
     
 10.1 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan*
     
 10.2 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan*
     
 10.3 Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan*
     
 10.4 Form of Restricted Equity Award under the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan*
     
 10.5.1 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC and Global Water Resources, Inc. (n/k/a Global Water, Inc.), dated December 9, 2005.


II-2


See Exhibit Index following the signature page.

(b) Financial statement schedules

     
Exhibit
  
Number
 
Document
 
     
 10.5.2 First Modification Agreement between Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, Global Water, Inc., and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated July 1, 2006*
     
 10.5.3 Second Modification Agreement between Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, Global Water, Inc., and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated December 1, 2006*
     
 10.5.4 Third Modification Agreement between Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, Global Water, Inc., and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated April 20, 2007*
     
 10.5.5 Fourth Modification Agreement between Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, Global Water, Inc., and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated February 28, 2008*
     
 10.6 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Line of Credit Note between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC and Global Water, Inc., dated April 20, 2007*
     
 10.7 Amended and Restated Security Agreement between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC and Global Water Resources, Inc., dated December 9, 2005
     
 10.8 Intercreditor Agreement between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, U.S. Bank National Association, and Global Water Resources, LLC, dated as of December 1, 2006*
     
 10.9 Consent and Agreement of Guarantors and Pledgors between Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, Global Water, Inc., (f/k/a Global Water Resources, Inc.), Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, William S. Levine, Levine Investments Limited Partnership, Trevor Hill, Leo Commandeur, Daniel Cracchiolo, Andrew Cohn, Graham Symmonds and Cindy Liles, dated April 20, 2007*
     
 10.10 Stock Pledge Agreement (Cave Creek Water Co.) among Global Water Resources, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.11 Stock Pledge Agreement (Global Water Resources, Inc.) among Global Water Resources, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.12 Stock Pledge Agreement (Hassayampa Utility Company, Inc.) among Global Water Resources, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.13 Stock Pledge Agreement (Pacer Equities Co.) among Global Water Resources, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.14 Collateral Assignment of Member Interest (Global Water Management, LLC) among Levine Investments Limited Partnership, Trevor Hill, Leo Commandeur, Daniel Cracchiolo, Andrew Cohn, Graham Symmonds, and Cindy Liles and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.15 Collateral Assignment of Member Interest (Global Water Resources, LLC) among Levine Investments Limited Partnership, Trevor Hill, Leo Commandeur, Daniel Cracchiolo, Andrew Cohn, Graham Symmonds, and Cindy Liles and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.16 Collateral Assignment of Member Interest (Palo Verde Utility Company, LLC) among Global Water Resources, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.17 Collateral Assignment of Member Interest (Santa Cruz Water Company, LLC) among Global Water Resources, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*

II-3

Schedules not listed above have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not applicable or is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.


     
Exhibit
  
Number
 
Document
 
     
 10.18 Continuing Guaranty among Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, Global Water Resources, Inc. (n/k/a Global Water, Inc.), Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and Levine Investments Limited Partnership dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.19 Continuing Guaranty among Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, Global Water Resources, Inc. (n/k/a Global Water, Inc.), Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and William S. Levine dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.19.1 Stock Pledge Agreement (Global Water — Picacho Cove Utilities Company) among Global Water, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of October 19, 2006*
     
 10.20 Stock Pledge Agreement (Global Water — Palo Verde Utilities Company) among Global Water, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of October 19, 2006*
     
 10.21 Stock Pledge Agreement (Global Water — Santa Cruz Water Company) among Global Water, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of October 19, 2006*
     
 10.22 Stock Pledge Agreement (CP Water Company) among Global Water, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of April 20, 2007*
     
 10.23 Employment Agreement between Global Water Resources, LLC and Trevor T. Hill, dated October 24, 2003
     
 10.24 Guaranty for Office Lease Agreement between E & V Investments, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC and Global Water Resources, LLC, dated November 15, 2005
     
 10.25 Office Lease Agreement between E & V Investments, LLC and Global Water Management, LLC, dated November 15, 2005*
     
 10.26 Loan Agreement dated as of December 1, 2006 among Global Water Resources, LLC, The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima and U.S. Bank National Association
     
 10.27 First Amendment dated as of November 1, 2007 to Loan Agreement dated as of December 1, 2006 among Global Water Resources, LLC, The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima and U.S. Bank National Association
     
 10.28 Consulting Agreement dated as of December 15, 2005 among Williams Manufacturing Company, Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, and Global Water, Inc.
     
 10.29 Wastewater Treatment, Collection and Management Services Agreement dated as of June 25, 2003 among the 387 Wastewater Improvement District and Sonoran Utility Services, LLC
     
 10.30 Agreement Relating to Assignment of Management Agreement for the 387 Wastewater Improvement District dated as of September 1, 2005 among Sonoran Utility Services, LLC and Global Water Resources, LLC
     
 10.31 Water Supply and Management Services Agreement dated as of June 25, 2003 among the 387 Water Improvement District and Sonoran Utility Services, LLC
     
 10.32 Agreement Relating to Assignment of Management Agreement for the 387 Water Improvement District dated as of September 1, 2005 among Sonoran Utility Services, LLC and Global Water Resources, LLC
     
 10.33 Indemnification Agreement dated as of December 3, 2003 among Sonoran Utility Services, LLC and the 387 Domestic Water Improvement District
     
 10.34 Indemnification Agreement dated as of December 3, 2003 among Sonoran Utility Services, LLC and the 387 Domestic Wastewater Improvement District

II-4


     
Exhibit
  
Number
 
Document
 
     
 10.35 Security Agreement dated as of September 1, 2005 among Sonoran Utility Services, LLC, the 387 Wastewater Improvement District and the 387 Water Improvement District
     
 21.1 List of subsidiaries
     
 23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
     
 23.2 Consent of Powell Goldstein LLP (included in the opinion filed as Exhibit 5.1)
     
 24.1 Power of attorney (included on signature page.)
*To be filed by amendment.
(b) Financial Statement Schedules
None.
Item 17.Undertakings

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriter at the closing specified in the underwriting agreements,agreement, certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriter to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we havethe registrant has been informedadvised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by usthe registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of our companythe registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by thatsuch director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, wethe registrant will, unless in the opinion of ourits counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether thissuch indemnification by usit is against public policy as expressed in the suchSecurities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:

(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.

II-2


(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initialbona fideoffering thereof.

II-5

II-3


SIGNATURES

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Phoenix, State of Arizona, on the 13th day of May, 2008.
January 19, 2016.

Global Water Resources, Inc.
GLOBAL WATER RESOURCES, INC.
By:

/s/ Trevor T. Hill

Ron L. Fleming

Ron L. Fleming
President and Chief Executive Officer
Trevor T. Hill
President and Chief Executive Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS

We, the undersigned directors and officers of Global Water Resources, Inc., dothat each person whose signature appears below does hereby constitute and appoint William S. LevineRon L. Fleming and Trevor T. Hill, or eitherMichael J. Liebman, and each of them, our true and lawful attorneys and agents, with full power of substitution and full power to doact without the other, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent to act for him or her in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all acts and things in our name and on our behalf in our capacities, as directors and officers and to execute any and all instruments for us and in our names in the capacities indicated below, which said attorneys and agents, or either of them, may deem necessary or advisable to enable said registrant to comply with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in connection with this Registration Statement, including specifically, but without limitation, power and authority to sign for us or any of us in our names in the capacities indicated below, any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments and any relatedamendments) to this registration statement, pursuantand to Rule 462(b) underfile this registration statement, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities Actand Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of 1933,them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in order to effectuate the same as amended) heretofully, to all intents and wepurposes, as they, he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifyratifying and confirmconfirming all that said attorneysattorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, shallmay lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statementregistration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

 

Title

 

Date

By: 
Signature
Title
Date

/s/ William S. Levine


William S. LevineTrevor T. Hill

Trevor T. Hill

 Chairman of the Board May 13, 2008January 19, 2016
By: 

/s/ Ron L. Fleming

Ron L. Fleming

 
/s/  Trevor T. Hill

Trevor T. Hill

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director
(principal executive officer)January 19, 2016
By: May 13, 2008

/s/ Michael J. Liebman

Michael J. Liebman

 

Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 January 19, 2016
By:

/s/ Daniel Cracchiolo

Daniel CracchioloWilliam S. Levine

William S. Levine

 Director May 13, 2008January 19, 2016
By: 

/s/ David C. Tedesco

David C. Tedesco

 
/s/  Cindy M. Liles

Cindy M. LilesDirector
 Senior Vice President of
Growth Services and
Treasurer (principal financial
and accounting officer)January 19, 2016
By: May 13, 2008

/s/ Richard M. Alexander

Richard M. Alexander

DirectorJanuary 19, 2016
By:

/s/ L. Rita Theil

L. Rita Theil

DirectorJanuary 19, 2016
By:

/s/ Cindy M. Bowers

Cindy M. Bowers

DirectorJanuary 19, 2016


II-6

II-4


INDEX OF EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT INDEX
     
Exhibit
  
Number
 
Document
 
     
 1.1 Form of Underwriting Agreement*
     
 2.1 Form of proposed Contribution Agreement between the members of Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC and Global Water Resources, Inc.
     
 2.2 Stock Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions as of December 30, 2006 among Michael Saunders and Global Water, Inc.
     
 2.3 First Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions as of January 29, 2007 among Michael Saunders and Global Water, Inc.
     
 2.4 Second Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions dated as of August 13, 2007 2006 among Michael Saunders and Global Water, Inc.
     
 2.5 CHI Construction Company/Global Water, Inc. Sale and Purchase and Partial Funding Agreement dated as of December 30, 2006 among Michael Saunders and Global Water, Inc.
     
 2.6 Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of January 23, 2004 among Global Water Resources, LLC and Phoenix Capital Partners, LLC
     
 2.7 Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of January 23, 2004 among Global Water Resources, LLC and Phoenix Utility Management, LLC
     
 2.8 Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of June 15, 2005 among Sonoran Utility Services, LLC and Global Water Resources, LLC
     
 2.9 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of March 9, 2006 among Global Water Resources, Inc. (n/k/a Global Water, Inc.) and the parties identified therein
     
 2.10 Reinstatement and Amendment Agreement dated as of June 23, 2006 among Global Water Resources, Inc. (n/k/a Global Water, Inc.) and the parties identified therein
     
 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation of Global Water Resources, Inc.
     
 3.2 Bylaws of Global Water Resources, Inc.*
     
 4.1 Specimen Common Stock Certificate*
     
 4.2 Trust Indenture dated as of December 1, 2006 from The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima to U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee
     
 4.3 First Supplemental Trust Indenture dated as of November 1, 2007 from The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima to U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee
     
 5.1 Opinion of Powell Goldstein LLP*
     
 10.1 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan*
     
 10.2 Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan*
     
 10.3 Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement under the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan*
     
 10.4 Form of Restricted Equity Award under the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan*
     
 10.5.1 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC and Global Water Resources, Inc. (n/k/a Global Water, Inc.), dated December 9, 2005.
     
 10.5.2 First Modification Agreement between Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, Global Water, Inc., and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated July 1, 2006*


     
Exhibit
  
Number
 
Document
 
     
 10.5.3 Second Modification Agreement between Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, Global Water, Inc., and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated December 1, 2006*
     
 10.5.4 Third Modification Agreement between Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, Global Water, Inc., and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated April 20, 2007*
     
 10.5.5 Fourth Modification Agreement between Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, Global Water, Inc., and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, dated February 28, 2008*
     
 10.6 Third Amended and Restated Revolving Line of Credit Note between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC and Global Water, Inc., dated April 20, 2007*
     
 10.7 Amended and Restated Security Agreement between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC and Global Water Resources, Inc., dated December 9, 2005
     
 10.8 Intercreditor Agreement between Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, U.S. Bank National Association, and Global Water Resources, LLC, dated as of December 1, 2006*
     
 10.9 Consent and Agreement of Guarantors and Pledgors between Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, Global Water, Inc., (f/k/a Global Water Resources, Inc.), Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, William S. Levine, Levine Investments Limited Partnership, Trevor Hill, Leo Commandeur, Daniel Cracchiolo, Andrew Cohn, Graham Symmonds and Cindy Liles, dated April 20, 2007*
     
 10.10 Stock Pledge Agreement (Cave Creek Water Co.) among Global Water Resources, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.11 Stock Pledge Agreement (Global Water Resources, Inc.) among Global Water Resources, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.12 Stock Pledge Agreement (Hassayampa Utility Company, Inc.) among Global Water Resources, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.13 Stock Pledge Agreement (Pacer Equities Co.) among Global Water Resources, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.14 Collateral Assignment of Member Interest (Global Water Management, LLC) among Levine Investments Limited Partnership, Trevor Hill, Leo Commandeur, Daniel Cracchiolo, Andrew Cohn, Graham Symmonds, and Cindy Liles and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.15 Collateral Assignment of Member Interest (Global Water Resources, LLC) among Levine Investments Limited Partnership, Trevor Hill, Leo Commandeur, Daniel Cracchiolo, Andrew Cohn, Graham Symmonds, and Cindy Liles and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.16 Collateral Assignment of Member Interest (Palo Verde Utility Company, LLC) among Global Water Resources, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.17 Collateral Assignment of Member Interest (Santa Cruz Water Company, LLC) among Global Water Resources, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.18 Continuing Guaranty among Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, Global Water Resources, Inc. (n/k/a Global Water, Inc.), Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and Levine Investments Limited Partnership dated as of December 9, 2005*


     
Exhibit
  
Number
 
Document
 
     
 10.19 Continuing Guaranty among Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, Global Water Resources, Inc. (n/k/a Global Water, Inc.), Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and William S. Levine dated as of December 9, 2005*
     
 10.19.1 Stock Pledge Agreement (Global Water — Picacho Cove Utilities Company) among Global Water, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of October 19, 2006*
     
 10.20 Stock Pledge Agreement (Global Water — Palo Verde Utilities Company) among Global Water, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of October 19, 2006*
     
 10.21 Stock Pledge Agreement (Global Water — Santa Cruz Water Company) among Global Water, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of October 19, 2006*
     
 10.22 Stock Pledge Agreement (CP Water Company) among Global Water, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association dated as of April 20, 2007*
     
 10.23 Employment Agreement between Global Water Resources, LLC and Trevor T. Hill, dated October 24, 2003
     
 10.24 Guaranty for Office Lease Agreement between E & V Investments, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC and Global Water Resources, LLC, dated November 15, 2005
     
 10.25 Office Lease Agreement between E & V Investments, LLC and Global Water Management, LLC, dated November 15, 2005*
     
 10.26 Loan Agreement dated as of December 1, 2006 among Global Water Resources, LLC, The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima and U.S. Bank National Association
     
 10.27 First Amendment dated as of November 1, 2007 to Loan Agreement dated as of December 1, 2006 among Global Water Resources, LLC, The Industrial Development Authority of the County of Pima and U.S. Bank National Association
     
 10.28 Consulting Agreement dated as of December 15, 2005 among Williams Manufacturing Company, Global Water Resources, LLC, Global Water Management, LLC, and Global Water, Inc.
     
 10.29 Wastewater Treatment, Collection and Management Services Agreement dated as of June 25, 2003 among the 387 Wastewater Improvement District and Sonoran Utility Services, LLC
     
 10.30 Agreement Relating to Assignment of Management Agreement for the 387 Wastewater Improvement District dated as of September 1, 2005 among Sonoran Utility Services, LLC and Global Water Resources, LLC
     
 10.31 Water Supply and Management Services Agreement dated as of June 25, 2003 among the 387 Water Improvement District and Sonoran Utility Services, LLC
     
 10.32 Agreement Relating to Assignment of Management Agreement for the 387 Water Improvement District dated as of September 1, 2005 among Sonoran Utility Services, LLC and Global Water Resources, LLC
     
 10.33 Indemnification Agreement dated as of December 3, 2003 among Sonoran Utility Services, LLC and the 387 Domestic Water Improvement District
     
 10.34 Indemnification Agreement dated as of December 3, 2003 among Sonoran Utility Services, LLC and the 387 Domestic Wastewater Improvement District
     
 10.35 Security Agreement dated as of September 1, 2005 among Sonoran Utility Services, LLC, the 387 Wastewater Improvement District and the 387 Water Improvement District
     
 21.1 List of subsidiaries


     
Exhibit
  
Number
 
Document
 
     
 23.1 Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP
     
 23.2 Consent of Powell Goldstein LLP (included in the opinion filed as Exhibit 5.1)
     
 24.1 Power of attorney (included on signature page.)
Exhibit
Number

Description of Exhibit

Method of Filing

*  1.1Form of Underwriting AgreementTo be filed by amendment.amendment hereto
  2.1Arrangement AgreementFiled herewith
  3.1Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Global Water Resources, Inc.To be filed by amendment hereto
  3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws of Global Water Resources, Inc.To be filed by amendment hereto
  4.1Form of Common Stock CertificateTo be filed by amendment hereto
  4.2.1Trust Indenture Agreement, dated December 1, 2006Filed herewith
  4.2.2First Supplement to Trust Indenture Agreement, dated November 1, 2007Filed herewith
  4.2.3Second Supplemental Trust Indenture Agreement, dated August 1, 2008Filed herewith
  5.1Opinion of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.To be filed by amendment hereto
10.1Settlement Agreement for Stipulated Condemnation with the City of Buckeye, Arizona, dated March 19, 2015Filed herewith
10.2License Agreement with City of Maricopa, Arizona, dated November 9, 2006Filed herewith
10.3Employment Agreement with Ron Fleming, dated May 13, 2015*Filed herewith
10.4Employment Agreement with Michael J. Liebman, dated May 13, 2015*Filed herewith
10.5Infrastructure Coordination Agreement with Pecan Valley Investments, LLC, dated January 28, 2004Filed herewith
10.6Infrastructure Coordination Agreement with JNAN, LLC, dated July 1, 2004Filed herewith
10.7Infrastructure Coordination and Finance Agreement with Dana B. Byron and Jamie Maccallum, dated July 21, 2006Filed herewith
10.8Infrastructure Coordination and Finance Agreement with The Orchard at Picacho, LLC, dated January 8, 2008Filed herewith
10.9Infrastructure Coordination, Finance and Option Agreement with Sierra Negra Ranch, LLC, dated July 10, 2006Filed herewith
10.10Infrastructure Coordination and Finance Agreement, dated December 20, 2007Filed herewith
10.11.1Loan Agreement, dated December 1, 2006Filed herewith


Exhibit
Number

Description of Exhibit

Method of Filing

10.11.2First Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated November 1, 2007Filed herewith
10.11.3Second Amendment to Loan Agreement, dated August 1, 2008Filed herewith
10.12Bond Purchase Agreement, dated December 14, 2006Filed herewith
10.13Bond Purchase Agreement, dated November 19, 2007Filed herewith
10.14.1Bond Purchase Agreement, dated September 12, 2008Filed herewith
10.14.2Supplement, dated September 19, 2008, to Bond Purchase Agreement, dated September 12, 2008Filed herewith
10.15Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated October 1, 2008Filed herewith
10.16Second Amended and Restated Intercreditor Agreement, dated October 1, 2008Filed herewith
10.17.1GWR Global Water Resources Corp. Stock Option Plan*Filed herewith
10.17.2First Amendment to GWR Global Water Resources Corp. Stock Option Plan, dated September 12, 2012*Filed herewith
10.18Global Water Resources, Inc. First Amended and Restated Stock Appreciation Rights Plan, dated March 23, 2015*Filed herewith
10.19Global Water Resources, Inc. Deferred Phantom Stock Unit Plan, dated January 1, 2011*Filed herewith
10.20Global Water Resources, Inc. Phantom Stock Unit Plan, dated May 1, 2015*Filed herewith
10.21GWR Global Water Resource Corp. Deferred Phantom Stock Unit Plan, dated January 1, 2011*Filed herewith
21.1Subsidiaries of Global Water Resources, Inc.Filed herewith
23.1Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFiled herewith
23.2Consent of Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.Contained in Exhibit 5.1
24.1Power of AttorneySee signature page
99.1Arizona Corporation Commission Decision No. 74364Filed herewith

*Compensation plan or arrangement