As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2013

January 19, 2021

Registration No. 333-

333-245695

 
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON

Washington, D.C. 20549



Amendment No. 4 to

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.

 (Name

(Exact Name of registrantRegistrant as Specified in its charter)


Its Charter)

Delaware737337-1644635
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
Incorporation or Organization)

(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)

8697 Research Drive

Irvine, California 92618

(IRSI.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)Number)
(949) 465-0065

8697 Research Drive
Irvine, CA 92618
 (949) 465-0065

(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

 
Nicholas R. Toms

Steve Smith
Chief Executive Officer


DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.
8697 Research Drive

Irvine, CACalifornia 92618


(949) 465-0065
 (Name,

(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent forFor Service)

 
Copies to:

Gregory Sichenzia, Esq.
Jeff Cahlon, Esq.
Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP
61 Broadway
Copies to:
New York, New York 10006
Tel: (212) 930-9700

Donald Figliulo, Esq.

Peter F. Waltz, Esq.

Polsinelli PC

150 N. Riverside Plaza, Suite 3000

Chicago, IL 60606

Telephone: (312) 819-1900

Facsimile: (312) 893-2164

Fax: (212) 930-9725



APPROXIMATE DATE OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC:
From time

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to timethe public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement becomes effective.


Statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Formform are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest reinvestment plans, check the following box:box. xþ

i


If this Formform is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ________


If this Formform is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. _________


If this Formform is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. _________


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or a small reportingan emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer oþ
Smaller reporting company xþ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act.

ii

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE


Title of Each Class Of
Securities To Be Registered
 
Amount To Be
Registered
  
Proposed Maximum
Offering Price
Per Security
  
Proposed Maximum
Aggregate
Offering Price
  
Amount Of
Registration Fee
 
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (1)  2,927,333  $0.64(2) $1,873,493  $255.54 
Common Stock, $.001 par value issuable upon exercise of warrants (3)  1,463,667  $0.64(2)  936,747   127.77 
                 
Total  4,391,000       2,870,240   $383.31 

Title Of Each Class Of Securities To Be Registered Amount to be
registered(1)
  Proposed
maximum
offering
price per
share(2)
  Proposed
maximum
aggregate
offering
price
  Amount Of
Registration
Fee(3)
 
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share  13,091,486  $1.50  $19,637,229.00  $2,549.15 
Common Stock, Underlying Warrants  1,147,547  $1.50  $1,721,320.50  $223.43 
Total  14,239,033      $21,358,549.50  $2,772.58 

(1)
Represents outstanding shares of common stock offered by the selling stockholders. Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the shares offered hereby alsobeing registered hereunder include ansuch indeterminate number of additional shares of common stock as may from timebe issuable with respect to time become issuable by reasonthe shares being registered hereunder as a result of stock splits, stock dividends recapitalizations or other similar transactions.
(2)EstimatedThis price was designated by DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. The selling shareholders will sell shares of common stock at $0.64a price of $1.50 per share, or, if and when our common stock is quoted on the averageOTCQB market, at prevailing market prices or at privately negotiated prices. See “Plan of Distribution” contained in the prospectus.
(3)Calculated pursuant to Rule 457(o) based on an estimate of the high and low prices of the common stock as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board on September 18, 2013, for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act.
(3)Represents shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants offered by the selling stockholders.
proposed maximum aggregate offering price.

The registrantRegistrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.


 

iii



The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. The selling stockholdersWe may not sell these securities under this prospectus until the registration statement of which it is a part and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any statejurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED SEPTEMBER 23, 2013
JANUARY 19, 2021

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

LOGO
DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.

Up to 4,391,000

Shares

of Common Stock


This prospectus relates to the offeringresale by the selling stockholdersinvestors listed in the section of this prospectus entitled “Selling Stockholders” (the “Selling Stockholders”) of up to 4,391,00014,239,033 shares of common stock, including 2,927,333 outstanding shares and 1,463,667 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants.

Our common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “DPSI.” On September 18, 2013, the closing price(the “Shares”) of our common stock, was $0.72par value $0.001 per share.share (the “Common Stock”). The selling stockholders mayShares include 13,091,486 shares of Common Stock issued by the Company upon the conversion of previously outstanding shares of preferred stock and shares of Common Stock originally issued in various private transactions that closed in March 2016 through March 2019, shares of Common Stock originally issued in 2016 in satisfaction of prior Company obligations, and 1,147,547 shares of Common Stock underlying outstanding warrants previously issued by the Company.

Our registration of the Shares covered by this prospectus does not mean that the Selling Stockholders will offer or sell allany of the Shares. The Selling Stockholders will sell the Shares covered by this prospectus at a price of $1.50 per share, or, a portion of these shares from time to time in market transactions through any market on whichif and when our common stock is then traded, in negotiated transactions or otherwise, andquoted on the OTCQB market (or the OTXQX market), at prices and on terms that will be determined by the then prevailing market priceprices or at privately negotiated prices directly or through a broker or brokers, who may act as agent or as principal or by a combination of such methods of sale.prices. For additional information on the possible methods of sale that may be used by the Selling Stockholders, you should refer to the section of this prospectus entitled “Plan of Distribution.”


Concurrently withDistribution” beginning on page 28 of this offeringprospectus. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the Shares sold by the selling stockholders,Selling Stockholders.

No underwriter or other person has been engaged to facilitate the Company has registered for resale, by other selling stockholders, pursuant tosale of the Company’s Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement on Form S-1, SEC File No. 333-186619, up to 957,712 shares of Series D Preferred Stock and 11,661,176 shares of common stock.

Shares in this offering. We will bear all costs, relating toexpenses and fees in connection with the registration of these sharesthe Shares. The Selling Stockholders will bear all commissions and discounts, if any, attributable to their respective sales of our common stock, other thanthe Shares.

You should read this prospectus, any selling stockholders’ legal or accounting costs or commissions.


We will not receiveapplicable prospectus supplement and any proceeds from the sale of common stock by the selling stockholders.

related free writing prospectus carefully before you invest.

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before making any investment in our common stock, you should read and carefully consider the risks described in this prospectus underSee “Risk Factors” beginning on page 37 of this prospectus.



prospectus for information you should consider before buying shares of our common stock.

Our Common Stock is currently quoted on the OTC Pink Market under the symbol “DPSI”. On January 15, 2021, the last reported sale price for our Common Stock was $2.55 per share.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities, or determined ifpassed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus is truthful or complete.prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

Prospectus dated         , 2021

This prospectus is dated _____________, 2013
iv



ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS

You should rely only on the information containedwe have provided in this prospectus, or any applicable prospectus supplement or amendment thereto.and any related free writing prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information different information.from that contained in this prospectus, any applicable prospectus supplement or any related free writing prospectus. No dealer, salesperson or other person is authorized to give any information or to represent anything not contained in this prospectus, any applicable prospectus supplement or any related free writing prospectus. You must not rely on any unauthorized information or representation. This prospectus is an offer to sell only the Shares offered hereby, but only under circumstances and in jurisdictions where it is lawful to do so. You should assume that the information in this prospectus, any applicable prospectus supplement or any related free writing prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front of the document and that any information we have incorporated by reference is accurate only as of the date of the document incorporated by reference, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of a security.

The Selling Stockholders are offering the Shares only in jurisdictions where such issuances are permitted. The distribution of this prospectus and the issuance of the Shares in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law. Persons outside the United States who come into possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about, and observe any restrictions relating to, the issuance of the Shares and the distribution of this prospectus outside the United States. This prospectus does not constitute, and may not be used in connection with, an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, the Shares offered by this prospectus by any person in any jurisdiction in which it is unlawful for such person to make such an offer or solicitation.

This prospectus is part of a registration statement that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), under which the Selling Stockholders may offer from time to time up to an aggregate of 14,240,269 shares of our Common Stock in one or more offerings. If required, each time a Selling Stockholder offers Common Stock, in addition to this prospectus, we will provide you with a prospectus supplement that will contain specific information about the terms of that offering. We may also authorize one or more free writing prospectuses to be provided to you that may contain material information relating to that offering. We may also use a prospectus supplement and any related free writing prospectus to add, update or change any of the information contained in this prospectus or in documents we have incorporated by reference. This prospectus, together with any applicable prospectus supplements and any related free writing prospectuses, includes all material information relating to this offering. To the extent that any statement that we make in a prospectus supplement is inconsistent with statements made in this prospectus, the statements made in this prospectus will be deemed modified or superseded by those made in a prospectus supplement. Please carefully read both this prospectus and any prospectus supplement.

i


PROSPECTUS SUMMARY


Prospectus Summary

This summary highlights selected information contained throughoutelsewhere in this prospectus or incorporated by reference in this prospectus, and is qualified in its entirety to the more detailed information and financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the information that you need to consider in making your investment decision. You should be considered before investing in our common stock. Investors shouldcarefully read the entire prospectus, carefully,any applicable prospectus supplement and any related free writing prospectus, including the more detailed information regarding our business, the risks of purchasinginvesting in our common stockCommon Stock discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” contained in this prospectus, any applicable prospectus supplement and any related free writing prospectus, and under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 6 ofsimilar headings in the other documents that are incorporated by reference into this prospectus. You should also carefully read the information incorporated by reference into this prospectus, andincluding our financial statements, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis”, and the accompanying notes beginning on page F-1exhibits to the registration statement of this prospectus.


Inwhich this prospectus we referforms a part. Unless otherwise mentioned or unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this prospectus to “DecisionPoint”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, “our” or similar references mean DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. as the “Company,”and its consolidated subsidiaries.

The Company

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“DecisionPoint”, “we”, “us” or “our”.


Our Company

We are an enterprise systemsthe “Company”), through its subsidiary corporations, is a provider and integrator that providesof mobility systems integration and supply chain systems integration, as well as traditional scanning and mobility hardware solutions.  We design, deploy and support mobile computing and wireless systems for business organizations. The Company designs, deploys and supports mobile computing systems that enable our customers to access enterpriseemployers’ data networks at the point of decision whether they are onvarious locations (i.e. the retail selling floor, nurse workstations, warehouse loading dockand distribution centers or on the road making deliveries.  These systems generally include mobiledeliveries via enterprise-grade handheld computers, mobile application software,printers, tablets, and relatedsmart phones). The Company also develops and integrates data capture equipment including bar code scanners and radio frequency identification (“RFID”)(RFID) readers. We also provide professional services including consulting, proprietaryMobile workers need information, access to corporate resources, decision support tools and third party software and software customization as an integral part of our customized solutions for our customers.  Our supply chain systems integration offerings include Warehouse Management Systems, Transportation Management Systems, and Enterprise Resource Planning Systems as well as legacy systems.  We operate in one business segment.

We deliver to our customers the ability to make better, fastercapture information and more accurate business decisions by implementing industry-specific, enterprise wireless and mobile computing systems for their front-line employees, inside and outside of the ‘four-walls’.  It is these systems which provide the information to improve the hundreds of individual business decisions made each day.  The “productivity paradox” is that the information remains locked away in their organization’s enterprise computing system, and historically, accessible only when employees were at their desk.  Our solutions solve this productivity issue.  As a result our customers are able to move their business decision points closer to their own customers who in turn, drive their own improved productivity and operational efficiencies.

We accomplish this by providing our customers with everything they need to achieve their enterprise mobility goals, starting with the planning of their systems,report it back to the design and build stage, to the deployment and support stage, and finally to achieving their projected Return On Investment.

We have developed an ‘ecosystem’ of partners which we bring to every customer situation.  The standout partner in this ecosystem is Motorola Solutions, Inc. (“Motorola Solutions”), which provides the vast amount of our re-sold products including bar code scanners, battery’s charging stations and accessories.  We also partner with other top equipment and software suppliers such as Zebra Technologies Corporation, Datamax - O’Neil — a unit of the Dover Corporation, in addition to a host of specialized independent software vendors such as AirVersent, AirWatch, Antenna Software, Verifone GlobalBay and Wavelink.
We are focused on several commercial enterprise markets.  These include retail, manufacturing, distribution, transportation and logistics.  We are also increasingly focused on the markets for these systems in the markets where there are large groups of field services workers.  These markets include maintenance and repair, inspections, deliveries, and other specialized business services such as uniform rental.  This part of our business did not exist a few years ago.  But with the continued growth of the mobile internet, we expect to add resources in this area in order to take advantage of the increasing opportunities.  We expect our customers to continue to embrace and deploy new technology to enhance their own customers’ experience with business and improve their own operations to lower their operating costs and better service their customers.  Our expertise and understanding of our customers’ operations and business operations in general, coupled with our expertise and understanding of new technology for equipment and software offerings enables us to identify new trends and opportunities to implement new solutions to our existing and potential customers.
We have several offices throughout the U.S which allows us to serve any customer on a nation-wide basis.  We can provide depot services through our West and East coast facilities.

We have recently seen indications that the major retailers are optimistic about the future economic climate which will translate into increased opportunities in our largest target market.  Additionally, we are always keenly aware of potential acquisition candidates that can provide complementary products and service offerings to our customer base.

An investment in DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. is speculative and involves substantial risks. You should read the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus for a discussion of certain factors to consider carefully before deciding to invest in us.
Corporate Information
organization.

Background

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., formerly known as Comamtech, Inc., was incorporated on August 16, 2010, in Canada under the laws of the Ontario Business Corporations Act (“OCBA”).2010. On June 15, 2011, we entered into a Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) among the Company, its wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary, 2259736 Ontario Inc., incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada (the “Purchaser”) and DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation that had been publicly traded since June 2009 (“Old DecisionPoint”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, under Section 182 of the OCBA, on June 15, 2011 (the “Effective Date”) Old DecisionPoint merged (the “Merger”) into the PurchaserOntario 2259736 and became a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Prior to the Merger, Comamtech was a “shell company” (as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”))Act). In connection with the Merger,this merger, the Company changed its name to DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., and the Purchaser2259736 Ontario changed its name to DecisionPoint Systems International, Inc. (“DecisionPoint Systems International”). On June 15, 2011, both companies were reincorporated in the State of Delaware.

DecisionPoint currently has two wholly owned subsidiaries, DecisionPoint Systems International and ExtenData Solutions, LLC (“ExtenData”). In turn, DecisionPoint Systems International has one wholly owned subsidiary, DecisionPoint Systems Group Inc. (“DPS Group”). DPS Group has three wholly owned subsidiaries, DecisionPoint Systems CA, Inc., DecisionPoint Systems CT, Inc and Royce Digital Systems, Inc. (“RDS”).

DPS Group acquired RDS in June 2018. RDS provides innovated enterprise print and mobile technologies, deployment services and on-site maintenance. RDS is located in Southern California. The acquisition was intended to increase the Company’s expertise and reach in the healthcare industry, other vertical markets and provide a stronger regional presence across California.

DecisionPoint Systems CA, Inc., formerly known as Creative Concepts Software, Inc., was founded in 1995 and is a provider of Enterprise Mobility Solutions. Enterprise Mobility Solutions are those computer systems that give an enterprise the ability to connect to people, control assets, and transact business from any location by using mobile computers, tablet computers, and smartphones to securely connect the mobile worker to the back office software systems that run the enterprise. Technologies that support Enterprise Mobility Solutions include national wireless carrier networks, Wi-Fi, local area networks, mobile computers, smartphones and tablets, mobile software applications, middleware and device security and management software.  

DecisionPoint Systems CT, Inc., formerly known as Sentinel Business Systems, Inc., was founded in 1976 and has developed over time a family of enterprise data collection software solutions, products and services. DecisionPoint Systems CT, Inc. is a data collection systems integrator that sells and installs mobile devices, software, and related bar coding equipment, radio frequency identification (“RFID”) systems technology and provides custom solutions and other professional services.

1

About this Offering

August 2013 Private Placement

As of August 15, 2013,

On December 4, 2020, the Company entered intoacquired a securities purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with accredited investors (the “Investors”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,756,400. Closings were held as of August 15, 2013 and August 21, 2013. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company sold an aggregate of 2,927,333 Units, each Unit consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase one-half of one share of common stock (the “Investor Warrants”), for a purchase price of $0.60 per Unit, such that the Company sold an aggregate of 2,927,333 shares of common stock (the “Common Shares”) and 1,463,667 Investor Warrants for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,756,400 (the “Private Placement”). The Investor Warrants have a five-year term and an exercise price of $1.00 per share


Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company granted to the Investors anti-dilution rights such that, for the period commencing on August 15, 2013 and terminating August 21, 2015,100% membership interest in ExtenData. ExtenData is headquartered in the event the Company issues or grants any shares of common stock or securities convertible, exchangeable or exercisable for shares of common stock (subject to certain exceptions) pursuant to which shares of common stock may be acquired at a price less than $0.60 per share, then the Company will issue additional shares of common stock to the Investors in an amount sufficientDenver, Colorado metropolitan area and focuses on enterprise mobility solutions and that the subscription price paid under the Private Placement, when divided by the total number of shares issued, will result in an actual price paid by such Investors per share of common stock equal to such lower price.

provides software product development, mobile computing, identification and tracking solutions, and wireless tracking solutions. 

Risk Factors

The Company retained Newport Coast Securities, Inc. (the “Placement Agent” or "Newport") as the placement agent for the Private Placement. The Company paid the Placement Agent $175,640 in commissions (equal to 10% of the gross proceeds), and issued to the Placement Agent and its designees five-year warrants (the “Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase 292,733 shares of common stock (equal to 10% of the number of Units sold in the Private Placement) at an exercise price of $0.60 per share, exercisable on a cashless basis, in connection with the Private Placement. Newport is not acting or serving as underwriter or selling agent with respect to the sale of securities by the selling stockholders and has no agreement with the selling stockholders or the Company with respect to any such services. Neither Newport nor any of its associated persons are participating as a selling stockholder under this prospectus.


The Investors included Nicholas Toms, the Company’s chief executive officer, who purchased 166,667 Units for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000, and an additional existing stockholder of the Company, who purchased 83,333 Units for an aggregate purchase price of $50,000.

The Company received net proceeds from the Private Placement of approximately $1.4 million, after deducting the Placement Agent’s commissions and other offering expenses. The Company intends to use the net proceeds for working capital and other general corporate purposes.
Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to, within 30 days of August 21, 2013, file a registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering the re-sale of the Common Shares and the shares of common stock underlying the Investor Warrants. The Company also agreed to use its best efforts to have the Registration Statement become effective as soon as possible after filing (and in any event within 120 days of the filing of such Registration Statement).
In connection with the foregoing, the Company relied on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for transactions not involving a public offering, and Rule 506 of Regulation D thereunder.

This prospectus includes the (i) 2,927,333 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and (ii) 1,463,667 shares issuable upon exercise of the Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement

As of June 30, 2013, we had negative working capital of $13.6 million and total stockholders’ deficit of $2.45 million.  As of December 31, 2012, we had negative working capital of $9.1 million and total stockholders’ equity of $0.9 million.  
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders:  shares of common stock, including the following:
2,927,333 outstanding shares of common stock sold in the Private Placement,
1,463,667 shares of common stock underlying the Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement;
Common stock to be outstanding after the offeringUp to 13,607,763 shares. (1)
OTCBB symbolDPSI
(1) Based on 12,144,096 shares of common stock outstanding as of September 18, 2013. Assumes exercise of the 1,463,667 Investor Warrants.

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our securities hasStock offered hereby involves a high degree of risk. risks and uncertainties, including those highlighted in “Risk Factors” following the prospectus summary, and should not be purchased by investors who cannot afford the loss of their entire investment.

Corporate Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 8697 Research Drive, Irvine, California. Our telephone number is (949) 465-0065, and our website address is www.decisionpt.com. Unless expressly noted, none of the information contained on our website is part of this prospectus or any prospectus supplement.

The Offering Summary

The Shares offered by Selling Stockholders includes up to 14,239,033 shares of Common Stock, comprised of shares of Common Stock issued in 2016 upon conversion of then outstanding promissory notes and preferred stock and in satisfaction of other prior Company obligations; shares of Common Stock issued in a private placement in June 2018, shares of Common Stock issued in a private placement in October 2018 and shares of Common Stock issued to an affiliate in March 2019. In addition, the Shares include a total of 1,147,547 shares of Common Stock underlying warrants originally issued by the Company in March 2016, June 2018 and October 2018.

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the Common Stock by any Selling Stockholder. The Selling Stockholders will sell the Shares at a price of $1.50 per share, or, if and when our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB market (or the OTXQX market), at prevailing market prices or at privately negotiated prices.

2

Summary Consolidated Financial information

The following summary consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 from our unaudited financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any period in the future and our results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any full year. You should read this information together with our financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus and the information in the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

(in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

  Three Months Ended
September 30
  Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
  2020  2019  2020  2019 
Net sales:            
Product $8,175  $8,585  $35,936  $22,755 
Service  2944   3,269   9,123   8,986 
Net sales  11,119   11,854   45,059   31,741 
Cost of sales:                
Product  6,784   6,994   28,576   18,496 
Service  2,213   1,950   6,152   5,500 
Cost of sales  8,997   8,944   34,728   23,996 
Gross profit  2,122   2,910   10,331   7,745 
Operating expenses:                
Sales and marketing expense  1,021   1,297   4,001   3,675 
General and administrative expenses  1,027   894   3,232   3,041 
Total operating expenses  2,048   2,191   7,233   6,716 
Operating income  74   719   3,098   1,029 
Interest expense  61   243   232   572 
Other expense (income)  (202)  1   (212)  1 
Income before income taxes  215   475   3,078   456 
Income tax (benefit) expense  (2)  124   817   119 
Net income and comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders $217  $351  $2,261  $337 
Earnings per share attributable to stockholders:                
Basic $0.02  $0.03  $0.17  $0.03 
Diluted $0.01  $0.02  $0.14  $0.02 
Weighted average common shares outstanding                
Basic  13,576   13,576   13,576   13,363 
Diluted  15,642   15,457   15,642   15,244 

3

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

(in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

  Year Ended
December 31,
 
  2019  2018 
Net sales:      
Product $31,990  $26,009 
Service  11,899   9,149 
Net sales  43,889   35,158 
Cost of sales:        
Product  25,866   21,614 
Service  7,267   6,287 
Cost of sales  33,133   27,901 
Gross profit  10,756   7,257 
Operating expenses:        
Sales and marketing expense  4,907   3,341 
General and administrative expenses  3,999   3,433 
Total operating expenses  8,906   6,774 
Operating income  1,850   483 
Interest expense  649   391 
Income before income taxes  1,201   92 
Income tax expense (benefit)  310   (3,883)
Net income and comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders $891  $3,975 
Earnings per share attributable to stockholders:        
Basic $0.07  $0.42 
Diluted $0.06  $0.35 
Weighted average common shares outstanding        
Basic  13,415   9,504 
Diluted  15,341   11,328 

4

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

  September 30,  December 31, 
  2020  2019 
ASSETS      
Current assets:      
Cash $3,683  $2,620 
Accounts receivable, net  8,824   8,710 
Inventory, net  940   3,825 
Deferred costs  1,840   2,201 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  296   268 
Total current assets  15,583   17,624 
Operating lease assets  422   516 
Property and equipment, net  234   239 
Deferred costs, net of current portion  1,330   1,258 
Deferred tax assets  1,889   2,659 
Intangible assets  1,890   2,394 
Goodwill  6,990   6,990 
Other assets, net  13   19 
Total assets $28,351  $31,699 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $7,004  $10,589 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  1,994   2,222 
Deferred revenue  3,606   3,630 
Line of credit  -   3,177 
Current portion of debt  1,157   144 
Due to related parties  108   124 
Current portion of operating lease liabilities  150   140 
Total current liabilities  14,019   20,026 
Deferred revenue, net of current portion  2,146   1,979 
Long-term debt  656   390 
Noncurrent portion of operating lease liabilities  280   388 
Total liabilities  17,101   22,783 
Stockholders’ equity:        
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding      
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 50,000 shares authorized; 13,576 and 13,576 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  14   14 
Additional paid-in capital  38,215   38,142 
Accumulated deficit  (26,979)  (29,240)
Total stockholders’ equity  11,250   8,916 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $28,351  $31,699 

5

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
ASSETS      
Current assets:      
Cash $2,620  $2,450 
Accounts receivable, net  8,710   8,190 
Inventory, net  3,825   356 
Deferred costs  2,201   1,966 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  268   141 
Total current assets  17,624   13,103 
Operating lease assets  516    
Property and equipment, net  239   140 
Deferred costs, net of current portion  1,258   746 
Deferred tax assets  2,659   2,924 
Intangible assets  2,394   3,127 
Goodwill  6,990   6,990 
Other assets, net  19   48 
Total assets $31,699  $27,078 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $10,589  $6,704 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  2,222   2,119 
Deferred revenue  3,630   3,811 
Line of credit  3,177   3,196 
Current portion of debt  144   422 
Due to related parties  124   108 
Current portion of operating lease liabilities  140    
Total current liabilities  20,026   16,360 
Deferred revenue, net of current portion  1,979   1,079 
Long-term debt  390   1,488 
Noncurrent portion of operating lease liabilities  388    
Other     452 
Total liabilities  22,783   19,379 
Stockholders’ equity:        
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding      
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 50,000 shares authorized; 13,576 and 12,875 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  14   13 
Additional paid-in capital  38,142   37,817 
Accumulated deficit  (29,240)  (30,131)
Total stockholders’ equity  8,916   7,699 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $31,699  $27,078 

6

Risk Factors

Before you invest in our common stock, you should understand the high degree of risk involved. You should carefully consider the following risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in this prospectus. If anyprospectus, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, before you decide to purchase shares of theour common stock. The following risks actually occur,may adversely impact our business operating results and financial condition could be harmed andcondition. As a result, the valuetrading price of our common stock could go down. This meansdecline and you could lose allpart or a partall of your investment.


RISKS RELATEDRELATING TO OUR BUSINESS


AND INDUSTRY

Our limited operating history as a public company makes it difficult for us to evaluateworking capital requirements may negatively affect our future business prospectsliquidity and make decisions based on those estimates of our future performance   .


Although our management team has been engaged in software development for an extended period of time and we began the operations of our current business in December 2003,capital resources. At various times, we have only been operatingexperienced negative working capital and minimal liquidity. For example, as of December 31, 2019, we had a public company withworking capital deficit of approximately $2,762,000. If our currentworking capital requirements vary significantly or if our short and long-term working capital needs exceed our cash flows from operations, since June 2009.  We have a limited operating history inwe would look to our current combined form,cash balances or other alternative sources of additional outside capital, which makes it difficult to evaluate our business on the basis of historical operations. As a consequence, it is difficult, if not impossible, to forecast our future results based upon our historical data. Reliance on our historical results may not be representative of the results we will achieve. Because of the uncertainties related to our lack of historical operations, we may be hinderedavailable on satisfactory terms and in our ability to anticipate and timely adapt to increases or decreases in sales, product costs or expenses. If we make poor budgetary decisions as a result of unreliable historical data, we could be less profitable or incur losses, which may result in a decline in our stock price.

The mobile computing industry is characterized by rapid technological change, and our success depends upon the frequent enhancement of existing products and timely introduction of new products that meet our customers’ needs.
Customer requirements for mobile computing products are rapidly evolving and technological changes in our industry occur rapidly.  To keep up with new customer requirements and distinguish us from our competitors, we must frequently introduce new products and enhancements of existing products.  Enhancing existing products and developing new products is a complex and uncertain process.  It often requires significant investments in research and development (“R&D”) which we do not undertake. Evenadequate amounts, if we made significant investments in R&D, they may not result in products attractive or acceptable to our customers. Furthermore, we may not be able to launch new or improved products before our competition launches comparable products. Any of these factors could cause our business or financial results to suffer.
Future business combinations and acquisition transactions, if any, as well as recently closed business combinations and acquisition transactions may not succeed in generating the intended benefits and may, therefore, adversely affect shareholder value or our financial results.

Integration of new businesses or technologies into our business may have any of the following adverse effects:

We may have difficulty transitioning customers and other business relationships.
We may have problems unifying management following a transaction.
We may lose key employees from our existing or acquired businesses.
We may experience intensified competition from other companies seeking to expand sales and market share during the integration period.
Our management’s attention may be diverted to the assimilation of the technology and personnel of acquired businesses or new product or service lines.
We may experience difficulties in coordinating geographically disparate organizations and corporate cultures and integrating management personnel with different business backgrounds.

The inability of our management to successfully integrate acquired businesses, and any related diversion of management’s attention, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Business combinations and other acquisition transactions may have a direct adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity, or on our stock price.

To complete acquisitions or other business combinations, we may have to use cash, issue new equity securities with dilutive effects on existing stockholders, take on new debt, assume contingent liabilities or amortize assets or expenses in a manner that might have a material adverse effect on our balance sheet, results of operations or liquidity. We are required to record certain financing and acquisition-related costs and other items as current period expenses, which would have the effect of reducing our reported earnings in the period in which an acquisition is consummated. These and other potential negative effects of an acquisition transaction could prevent us from realizing the benefits of such transactions and have a material adverse impact on our stock price, revenues, revenue growth, balance sheet, results of operations and liquidity.
at all.

We may need to raise additional funds, and these funds may not be available when we need them or the additional funds may not be obtainedobtainable on favorable terms.


We may need to raise additional monies in order to fund our growth strategy and fully implement our business plan. Specifically, we may need to raise additional funds in order to pursue rapid expansion, develop new or enhanced services and products, and acquire complementary businesses or assets. Additionally, we may need funds to respond to unanticipated events that require us to make additional investments in or expenditures on behalf of our business. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed, on favorable terms, or at all. If these funds are not available when we need them, then we may need to change our business strategy, and reduce our rate of growth.
In the near term, our successful restructuring of our operations and reduction of operating costs and/growth or our ability to raise additional capital at acceptable terms is critical to its ability to continue to operate for the foreseeable future.  suffer losses or other adverse impacts.

If we continue to incur operating losses and/or do not raise sufficient additional capital, material adverse events may occur, including, but not limited to, 1) a reduction in the nature and scope of our operations, 2) our inability to fully implement our current business plan and/orand 3) continued defaults under the variousour existing loan agreements.  A covenant default would give the bankone of our creditors the right to demand immediate payment of all outstanding amounts, which we would likely not be able to repaypay out of normal operations. There are no assurances that we willcan successfully implement our plans with respect to these liquidity matters.

Our revolving line

A novel strain of credit agreements and our loan agreements may limit our flexibility in managingcoronavirus, COVID-19, could ultimately adversely affect our business operations and defaultsfinancial condition. In December 2019, an outbreak of any financialCOVID-19 was reported in Wuhan, China. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic and non-financial covenants in these agreements could adversely affect us.

Our revolving lineon March 13, 2020, President Donald J. Trump declared the virus a national emergency. This highly contagious disease has spread to most of credit agreements as well as our term loan impose operating restrictions on usthe countries in the form ofworld and throughout the United States, creating a serious impact on customers, workforces, and suppliers, disrupting economies and financial markets, and non-financial covenants (see ”Note 6 – Line of Credit” along with Note 7 –Term Debt”has led to a general economic downturn and volatility in our accompanying Notes to Form 10-Q Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus for additional details). These restrictions limit the manner in which we can conduct our business and may restrict us from engaging in favorable business opportunities. These restrictions limit our ability, among other things, to incur further debt, make future acquisitions and other investments, restrict making certain payments such as dividend payments, and restrict disposition of assets.
At July 31, 2013,financial markets. To date, the outstanding balance on our line of credit with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) is $3.1 million, down from $4.2 million at April 30, 2013, and the availability under the line of creditpandemic has increased to $2.6 million.  We relynot had a material adverse effect on the line of credit to fund daily operating activities maintaining very little cash on hand.  As of December 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all of our financial covenants with SVB. As of May 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013, we were not in compliance with the Tangible Net Worth financial covenant as defined in the amended SVB Loan Agreement. SVB agreed to temporarily forbear from exercising their rights and remedies under the facility until August 28, 2013 and has agreed to waive the existing covenant violations if a gross capital raise of $1.5 million is completed by such date. We completed the capital raise and were able to achieve compliance with the forbearance agreement prior to August 28, 2013. Accordingly, we believe that at the time of this filing it is compliance with the terms and provisions of its SVB lending agreements.  Except for any capital raises through August 28, 2013, the minimum Tangible Net Worth requirement of a $(9.7) million deficit will be further reduced by one half of any funds raised through sales of common stock (as only 50% of additional capital raises are given credit in the Tangible Net Worth calculation).  We estimate that our minimum Tangible Net Worth at July 31, 2013, giving pro forma effect for the net $1.3 million in capital raise closed to date in August, was approximately a $(9.2) million deficit, leaving approximately $0.5 million in Tangible Net Worth cushion over the requirement of the line of credit. Should we continue to incur losses in a manner consistent with its recent historical financial performance, we will violate this covenant without additional net capital raises in amounts that are approximately twice the amount of the losses incurred.
The RBC Term Loan has certain financial covenants and other non-financial covenants.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Apex was not in compliance with the Fixed Charge Coverage ratio (as defined by the RBC Credit Agreement).  The Fixed Charge Coverage ratio of not less than 1.25:1 is calculated as the ratio of the trailing twelve months of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) to loan payments and interest charges for the RBC Credit Agreement and the BDC Term Loan.  Our calculation of the Fixed Charge Coverage ratio at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is 0.58:1 and 0.86:1, respectively.  Additionally, at June 30, 2013 we were not in compliance with the Maximum Funded Debt to EBITDA ratio.  In order to be in compliance with this covenant, we need a ratio of not less than 2.25:1.  At June 30, 2013 our maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio was 2.29:1.  Under the RBC Credit Agreement, violation of this covenant is an Event of Default which grants RBC the right to demand immediate payment of outstanding balances.  In March 2013, May 2013 and August 2013, we received waivers for non-compliance of these covenants at December 31, 2012, March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013.  The covenants were reset by RBC on August 16, 2013.  We do not believe that we will be in compliance with the reset covenants at December 31, 2013. We are currently further discussing adjusting the reset debt covenants with RBC.  Although we believe it is improbable RBC will exercise their rights up to, and including, acceleration of the outstanding debt, there can be no assurance that RBC will not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the debt obligation.  Accordingly, we have classified the term debt obligation as current at June 30, 2013.

The BDC Loan Agreement contains certain financial and non-financial covenants which may materially impact our liquidity, including minimum working capital requirements, tangible net worth requirements and limitations on additional indebtedness.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Apex was not in compliance with the minimum working capital financial covenant.  In order to be in compliance with the minimum working capital requirement at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we would have needed an additional $0.7 and $0.5 million in working capital, respectively.  Under the BDC Loan Agreement, violation of this covenant is an Event of Default which grants BDC the right to demand immediate payment of outstanding balances.  In March 2013 and May 2013, we received waivers for non-compliance of these covenants at December 31, 2012, March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013.  We are currently discussing resetting debt covenants with BDC.  Although we believe it is improbable that BDC will exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the debt obligation up to, and including, acceleration of the outstanding debt, there can be no assurance that BDC will not exercise their rights. Accordingly, we have classified the debt obligation as current at June 30, 2013.

In connection with the BDC Loan Agreement, BDC executed a subordination agreement in favor of Silicon Valley Bank, pursuant to which BDC agreed to subordinate any security interest in assets of the Company granted in connection with the BDC Loan Agreement to Silicon Valley Bank’s existing security interest in assets of the Company.  The subordination agreement contains cross-default provisions which may materially impact our liquidity.

In the event either or both of the RBC Loan Agreement or the BDC Loan Agreement were deemed to be in default, RBC or BDC, as applicable, could, among other things (subject to the rights of SVB as the Company’s senior lender), terminate the facilities, demand immediate repayment of any outstanding amounts, and foreclose on our assets. Any such action would require us to curtail or cease operations. The Company does not have alternative sources of financing.
Our competitors may be able to develop their business strategy and grow revenue at a faster pace than us, which would limit our results of operations and financial performance. However, the pandemic has caused a disruption of the normal operations of many businesses, including the temporary closure or scale-back of business operations and/or the imposition of either quarantine or remote work or meeting requirements for employees, either by government order or on a voluntary basis. The pandemic has, and may force uscontinue to cease or curtail operations.

The wireless mobile solutions marketplace, while highly fragmented, is very competitive and manyadversely affect certain of our competitors are more established and have greater resources. We expect that competition will intensifycustomers’ ability to perform their missions (particularly in the future. Some of these competitorsretail sector) and is in certain cases disrupting their operations. From time to time, it may also have greater market presence, marketing capabilities, technological and personnel resources than we do. As compared with our company therefore, such competitors may:
develop and expand their infrastructure and service/product offerings more efficiently or more quickly
adapt more swiftly to new or emerging technologies and changes in client requirements
take advantage of acquisition and other opportunities more effectively
devote greater resources to the marketing and sale of their products and services
leverage more effectively existing relationships with customers and strategic partners or exploit better recognized brand names to market and sell their services.

These current and prospective competitors include:

other wireless mobile solutions companies such as International Business Machines, Accenture, Sedlak, Peak Technologies, Agilysys, Acsis, Stratix and Catalyst International
in certain areas our existing hardware suppliers, in particular Motorola Solutions but also Intermec, Zebra and others
the in-house IT departments of many of our customers.

A significant portionimpact the ability of our revenue is dependent upon a small number of customersservice providers, partners, and suppliers to operate and fulfill their contractual obligations, and result in an increase in their costs and cause delays in performance. These supply chain effects, and the lossdirect effect of any onethe virus and the disruption on certain of these customers wouldour customers’ operations, may ultimately negatively impact our revenues and our results of operations.
We derived approximately 19.4% of our revenues from two customers in 2012.  We derived approximately 23.5% of our revenues from our two largest customers in 2011.  For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had oneaggregate customer within the healthcare industry, that generated 12.5%  and 15.2%, respectively, of our total sales.
Customer mix shifts significantly from year to year, but a concentration of the business with a few large customers is typical in any given year.  A decline in our revenues could occur if a customer which has been a significant factor in one financial reporting period gives us significantly less business in the following period. Any one of our customers could reduce their ordersdemand for our products and services, and, in favorturn our revenue and profit margins. Additionally, the disruption and volatility in the global and domestic capital markets may increase the cost of a more competitive pricecapital and limit our ability to access capital. Both the health and economic aspects of COVID-19 are highly fluid and the future course of each is uncertain. For these reasons and other reasons that may come to light if the coronavirus pandemic continues and associated protective or different product at any time. The loss of any one of these customers or reduced purchases by them would not havepreventative measures expand, we may experience a material adverse effect on our business as we would adjust our personnel staffing levels accordingly.operations, revenues and financial condition; however, its ultimate impact is highly uncertain and subject to change.

7

Our contracts with these customers

The mobile computing industry is characterized by rapid technological change, and our other customers do not include any specific purchasesuccess depends upon the frequent enhancement of existing products and services and timely introduction of new products and services that meet our customers’ needs. Customer requirements or other requirements outside of the normal course of business. The majority of our customer contractsfor mobile computing products and services are on an annual basis for service support while on a purchase order basis for hardware purchases. Typical hardware sales are submitted on an estimated order basis with subsequent follow on orders for specific quantities. These sales are ultimately subject to the time that the units are installed at all of the customer locations as per their requirements. Service contracts are purchased on an annual basis generallyrapidly evolving and are the performance responsibility of the actual service provider as opposed to the Company. Termination provisions are generally standard clauses based upon non-performance, but a customer can cancel with a certain reasonable notice period anywhere from 30 to 90 days. General industry standards for contracts provide ordinary terms and conditions, while actual work and performance aspects are usually dictated by a Statement of Work which outlines what is being ordered, product specifications, delivery, installation and pricing.


If wireless carriers were to terminate or materially reduce their business relationships with us, our operating results would be materially harmed.

We have established key wireless carrier relationships with Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon. We have an informal arrangement with these carriers pursuant to which they provide us referrals of end users interested in field mobility solutions, and we, in turn, provide solutions which require cellular data networks. We do not have any binding agreements with these carriers. If these carriers were to terminate or materially reduce, for any reason, their business relationships with us, our operating results would be materially harmed.
Growth of andtechnological changes in our revenuesindustry occur rapidly. To keep up with new customer requirements and profits depend on the customer, product and geographic mix ofdistinguish us from our sales. Fluctuations in our sales mix could have an adverse impact on or increase the volatility of our revenues, gross margins and profits.
Sales of our products to large enterprises tend to have lower prices and gross margins than sales to smaller firms. In addition, our gross margins vary depending on the product or service made. Growth in our revenues and gross margins therefore depends on the customer, product and geographic mix of our sales. Ifcompetitors, we are unable to execute a sales strategy that results in a favorable sales mix, our revenues, gross margins and earnings may decline. Further, changes in the mix of our sales from quarter-to-quarter or year-to-year may make our revenues, gross margins and earnings more volatile and difficult to predict.

Our sales and profitability may be affected by changes in economic, business or industry conditions.
If the economic climate in the U.S. or abroad deteriorates, customers or potential customers could reduce or delay their technology investments. Reduced or delayed technology investments could decrease our sales and profitability. In this environment, our customers may experience financial difficulty, cease operations and fail to budget or reduce budgets for the purchase of our products and professional services. This may lead to longer sales cycles, delays in purchase decisions, payment and collection, and can also result in downward price pressures, causing our sales and profitability to decline. In addition, general economic uncertainty and general declines in capital spending in the information technology sector make it difficult to predict changes in the purchasing requirements of our customers and the markets we serve. There are many other factors which could affect our business, including:

the introduction and market acceptance ofmust frequently introduce new technologies, products and services;
new competitors and new forms of competition;
the size and timing of customer orders;
the size and timing of capital expenditures by our customers;
adverse changes in the credit quality of our customers and suppliers;
changes in the pricing policies of, or the introduction of, new products and services by us or our competitors;
changes in the terms of our contracts with our customers or suppliers;
the availability of products from our suppliers; and
variations in product costs and the mix of products sold.

These trends and factors could adversely affect our business, profitability and financial condition and diminish our ability to achieve our strategic objectives.

Use of third-party suppliers and service providers could adversely affect our product quality, delivery schedules or customer satisfaction, any of which could have an adverse effect on our financial results.

We rely heavily on a number of privileged vendor relationships as a VAR for the Motorola Solutions Partner Pinnacle Club program, a manufacturer of bar code scanners and portable data terminals; as an Honors Solutions Provider for Intermec, a manufacturer of bar code scanners and terminals; as a Premier Partner with Zebra, a printer manufacturer, and O’Neil, the leading provider of ‘ruggedized’ handheld mobile printers. The loss of VAR status with any of these manufacturers could have a substantial adverse effect on our business.

We have not sought to protect our proprietary knowledge through patents and, as a result, our sales and profitability could be adversely affected to the extent that competing products/services were to capture a significant portion of our target markets.

We have generally not sought patent protection for our products and services relying instead on our technical know-how and ability to design solutions tailored to our customers’ needs. Our salesenhancements of existing products and profitability could be adversely affected to the extent that competing products/services were to capture a significant portion of our target markets. To remain competitive, we must continually improve ourservices. Enhancing existing personnel skill sets and capabilities and the provision of the services related thereto. Our success will also depend, in part, on management’s ability to recognize new technologiesproducts and services and make arrangementsdeveloping new products and services is a complex and uncertain process. It often requires significant investments in research and development (“R&D”), which we do not undertake. Even if we made significant investments in R&D, they might not result in products or services attractive or acceptable to license in,our customers. Furthermore, we may not be able to launch new or acquire such technologies so as to always be at the leading edge.
We must effectively manage the growthimproved products or services before our competition launches comparable products or services. Any of our operations, or our company will suffer.

Our ability to successfully implement our business plan requires an effective planning and management process. If funding is available, we intend to increase the scope of our operations and acquire complementary businesses. Implementing our business plan will require significant additional funding and resources. If we grow our operations, we will need to hire additional employees and make significant capital investments. If we grow our operations, it will place a significant strain on our existing management and resources. If we grow, we will need to improve our financial and managerial controls and reporting systems and procedures, and we will need to expand, train and manage our workforce. Any failure to manage any of the foregoing areas efficiently and effectively wouldthese factors could cause our business or results or operations to suffer.

If we fail to continue to introduce new products that achieve broad market acceptance on a timely basis, we will not be able to compete effectively, and we will be unable to increase or maintain sales and profitability.


Our future success depends on our ability to develop and introduce new products and product enhancements that achieve broad market acceptance. If we are unable to develop and introduce new products that respond to emerging technological trends and customers’ mission critical needs, our profitability and market share may suffer. The process of developing new technology is complex and uncertain, and if we fail to accurately predict customers’ changing needs and emerging technological trends, our business could be harmed.

We are active in the identification and development of new product and technology services and in enhancing our current products. However, in the enterprise mobility solutions industry, such activities are complex and filled with uncertainty. If we expend a significant amount of resources and our efforts do not lead to the successful introduction of new or improved products, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, profitability, financial condition and market share.


We may also encounter delays in the manufacturing and production of new products from our principal suppliers. Additionally, new products may not be commercially successful. Demand for existing products may decrease upon the announcement of new or improved products. Further, since products under development are often announced before introduction, these announcements may cause customers to delay purchases of any products, even if newly introduced, until the new or improved versions of those products are available. If customer orders decrease or are delayed during the product transition, we may experience a decline in revenue and have excess inventory on hand which could decrease gross profit margins. Our profitability might decrease if customers, who may otherwise choose to purchase existing products, instead choose to purchase lower priced models of new products. Delays or deficiencies in the development, manufacturing, and delivery of, or demand for, new or improved products could have a negative effect on our business or profitability.


We face competition from numerous sources and competition may increase, leading to a decline in revenues.


We compete primarily with well-established companies, many of which we believe have greater resources than us. We believe that barriers to entry are not significant and start-up costs are relatively low, so our competition may increase in the future. New competitors may be able to launch new businesses similar to ours, and current competitors may replicate our business model, at a relatively low cost. If competitors with significantly greater resources than ours decide to replicate our business model, they may be able to quickly gain recognition and acceptance of their business methods and products through marketing and promotion. We may not have the resources to compete effectively with current or future competitors. If we are unable to effectively compete, we will lose sales to our competitors and our revenues will decline.

8


Our competitors may be able to develop their business strategy and grow revenue at a faster pace than us, which would limit our results of operations and may force us to cease or curtail operations. The wireless mobile solutions marketplace, while highly fragmented, is very competitive and many of our competitors are more established and have greater resources. We expect that competition will intensify in the future. Some of these competitors also have greater market presence, marketing capabilities, technological and personnel resources than the Company. As compared with our company therefore, such competitors may:

develop and expand their infrastructure and service/product offerings more efficiently or more quickly;
adapt more swiftly to new or emerging technologies and changes in client requirements;
take advantage of acquisition and other opportunities more effectively;
devote greater resources to the marketing and sale of their products and services; and
leverage more effectively existing relationships with customers and strategic partners or exploit better recognized brand names to market and sell their services.

These current and prospective competitors include:

other wireless mobile solutions companies such as CDW, Peak Ryzex, Stratix, Denali Advanced Integration, Optical Fushion, Barcoding Inc., and Quest Solution (OTCBB: OMQS);
in certain areas our existing hardware suppliers, in particular Zebra Technologies / Motorola Solutions but also Intermec and others; and
the in-house IT departments of many of our customers.

A significant portion of our revenue is dependent upon a small number of customers, and the loss of any one or more of these customers would negatively impact our results of operations. We had two customers who, together, represented 35% of the Company’s revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019. Our top two customers accounted for approximately 52% of consolidated net revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

Customer mix shifts significantly from year to year, but a concentration of the business with a few large customers is typical in any given year.  A decline in our revenues could occur if a customer which has been a significant factor in one financial reporting period gives us significantly less business in the following period. Any one of our customers could reduce their orders for our products and services in favor of a more competitive price or different product at any time. The loss of a significant customer could have a material adverse impact on our Company.

Our contracts with these customers and our other customers do not include any specific purchase requirements or other requirements outside of the normal course of business. The majority of our customer contracts are on an annual basis for service support while on a purchase order basis for hardware purchases. Typical hardware sales are submitted on an estimated order basis with subsequent follow on orders for specific quantities. These sales are ultimately subject to the time that the units are installed at all of the customer locations as per their requirements. Termination provisions are generally standard clauses based upon non-performance. General industry standards for contracts provide ordinary terms and conditions, while actual work and performance aspects are usually dictated by a Statement of Work which outlines what is being ordered, product specifications, delivery, installation and pricing.

If wireless carriers were to terminate or materially reduce their business relationships with us, our operating results would be materially harmed. We have established key wireless carrier relationships with Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon. We have an informal arrangement with these carriers pursuant to which they provide us referrals of end users interested in field mobility solutions, and we, in turn, provide solutions which require cellular data networks. We do not have any binding agreements with these carriers. If these carriers were to terminate or materially reduce, for any reason, their business relationships with us, our operating results would be materially harmed.

Use of third-party suppliers and service providers could adversely affect our product quality, delivery schedules or customer satisfaction, any of which could have an adverse effect on our financial results. In particular, we rely heavily on a number of privileged vendor relationships as a value added reseller (“VAR”) for the Motorola Solutions Partner Pinnacle Club program, a manufacturer of bar code scanners and portable data terminals; as an Honors Solutions Provider for Intermec, a manufacturer of bar code scanners and terminals; as a Premier Partner with Zebra, a printer manufacturer, and O’Neil, the leading provider of ‘ruggedized’ handheld mobile printers. The loss of VAR status with any of these manufacturers could have a substantial adverse effect on our business. Our ability to meet financial objectives depends on our ability to timely obtain an adequate delivery of hardware as well as services from our vendors.  Certain supplies are available from a single source or limited sources for which we may be unable to provide suitable alternatives in a timely manner.  In addition, we may experience increases in vendor prices that could have a negative impact on our business.  Credit constraints by our vendors could cause us to accelerate payables by us, impacting our cash flow.  Any unanticipated expense, or disruption in our business or operations relating a limited number of suppliers could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

9

Growth of and changes in our revenues and profits depend on the customer, product and geographic mix of our sales. Fluctuations in our sales mix could have an adverse impact on or increase the volatility of our revenues, gross margins and profits. Sales of our productsto large enterprises tend to have lower prices and gross margins than sales to smaller firms. In addition, our gross margins vary depending on the product or service delivered. Growth in our revenues and gross margins therefore depends on the customer, product and geographic mix of our sales. If we are unable to execute a sales strategy that results in a favorable sales mix, our revenues, gross margins and earnings may decline. Further, changes in the mix of our sales from quarter-to-quarter or year-to-year may make our revenues, gross margins and earnings more volatile and difficult to predict.

Our sales cycles can be long, unpredictable and require considerable time and expense, which may cause our operating results to fluctuate. Our sales cycle, which is the time between initial contact with a potential customer and the ultimate sale, is often lengthy and unpredictable. Some of our potential customers may already have partial managed mobility solutions in place under fixed-term contracts, which may limit their ability to commit to purchase our solution in a timely fashion. In addition, our potential customers typically undertake a significant evaluation process that can last up to a year or more, and which requires us to expend substantial time, effort and money educating them about the capabilities of our offerings and the potential cost savings they can bring to an organization. Furthermore, the purchase of our products and services may require coordination and agreement across many departments within a potential customer’s organization, which further contributes to our lengthy sales cycle. As a result, we have limited ability to forecast the timing and size of specific sales. Any delay in completing, or failure to complete, sales in a particular quarter or year could harm our business and could cause our operating results to vary significantly.

Our revolving line-of-credit agreement and our loan agreements may limit our flexibility in managing our business, and defaults of any financial and non-financial covenants in these agreements could adversely affect us. Our revolving-line-of-credit agreement as well as our term loan impose operating restrictions on us in the form of financial and non-financial covenants. These restrictions limit the manner in which we can conduct our business and may restrict us from engaging in favorable business opportunities. In addition, these restrictions limit our ability, among other things, to incur further debt, make future acquisitions and other investments, restrict making certain payments such as dividend payments, and restrict disposition of assets.

Our indebtedness may adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to operate our business. As of September 30, 2020, we had $1.8 million of total debt outstanding including promissory notes we issued in 2018, and we had availability under a line of credit of approximately $5.1 million. The line of credit expires in September 2023. Our level of indebtedness relative to stockholders’ equity could have important consequences to you, including with respect to our ability to declare and pay a dividend, and significant effects on our business, including the following:

we must use a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to pay interest on our debt obligations, which will reduce the funds available to use for operations and other purposes including our other financial obligations;
certain of our debt obligations are secured by significant Company assets;
our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions or general corporate purposes may be impaired;
we could be at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that may have proportionately less debt;
our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate may be limited;
our ability to fund a change of control offer may be limited; and
we may be more vulnerable to economic downturns and adverse developments in our business.

10

We expect to obtain the funds to pay our day to day expenses and to repay our indebtedness primarily from our operations. Our ability to meet our expenses and make these payments therefore depends on our future performance, which will be affected by financial, business, economic and other factors, many of which we cannot control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future, and our currently anticipated growth in sales and cash flow may not be realized, either or both of which could result in our being unable to repay indebtedness, including the outstanding promissory notes, or to fund other liquidity needs. If we do not have enough funds, we may be in breach our debt covenants and/or be required to refinance all or part of our then existing debt, sell assets or borrow more funds, which we may not be able to accomplish on terms favorable to us, or at all. In addition, the terms of existing or future debt agreements may restrict us from pursuing any of these alternatives.

Our sales and profitability may be affected by changes in economic, business or industry conditions. If the economic climate in the U.S. or abroad deteriorates as a result of COVID-19 or otherwise, customers or potential customers could reduce or delay their technology investments. Reduced or delayed technology investments could decrease our sales and profitability. In this environment, our customers may experience financial difficulty, cease operations and fail to budget or reduce budgets for the purchase of our products and professional services. This may lead to longer sales cycles, delays in purchase decisions, payment and collection, and can also result in downward price pressures, causing our sales and profitability to decline. In addition, general economic uncertainty and volatility, and general declines in capital spending in the information technology sector make it difficult to predict changes in the purchasing requirements of our customers and the markets we serve. There are many other factors which could affect our business, including:

the introduction and market acceptance of new technologies, products and services;
new competitors and new forms of competition;
the size and timing of customer orders;
the size and timing of capital expenditures by our customers;
adverse changes in the credit quality of our customers and suppliers;
changes in the pricing policies of, or the introduction of, new products and services by us or our competitors;
changes in the terms of our contracts with our customers or suppliers;
the availability of products from our suppliers; and
variations in product costs and the mix of products sold.

These trends and factors could adversely affect our business, profitability and financial condition and diminish our ability to achieve our strategic objectives.

We may be unable to protect our proprietary software and methodology. Our success depends, in part, upon our proprietary software, methodology and other intellectual property rights. We rely upon a combination of trade secrets, nondisclosure and other contractual arrangements, and copyright and trademark laws to protect our proprietary rights. We generally enter into nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements with our employees, partners, consultants, independent sales agents and customers, and limit access to and distribution of our proprietary information. We cannot be certain that the steps we take in this regard will be adequate to deter misappropriation of our proprietary information or that we will be able to detect unauthorized use and take appropriate steps to enforce our intellectual property rights. We have attempted to put in place certain safeguards in our policies and procedures to protect intellectual property developed by employees. Our policies and procedures stipulate that intellectual property created by employees and its consultants remain our property. If we are unable to protect our proprietary software and methodology, the value of our business may decrease, and we may face increased competition.

We have not sought to protect our proprietary knowledge through patents and, as a result, our sales and profitability could be adversely affected to the extent that competing products/services were to capture a significant portion of our target markets. We have generally not sought patent protection for our products and services, relying instead on our technical know-how and ability to design solutions tailored to our customers’ needs. Our sales and profitability could be adversely affected to the extent that competing products/services were to capture a significant portion of our target markets. To remain competitive, we must continually improve our existing personnel skill sets and capabilities and the provision of the services related thereto. Our success will also depend, in part, on management’s ability to recognize new technologies and services and make arrangements to license in or acquire such technologies so as to always be at the leading edge.

11

Assertions by a third party that our software products or technology infringes its intellectual property, whether or not correct, could subject us to costly and time-consuming litigation or expensive licenses. Although we believe that our services and products do not infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, infringement claims may be asserted against us in the future. There is frequent litigation in the communications and technology industries based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. As we face increasing competition, the possibility of intellectual property rights claims against us may increase. These claims, whether or not successful, could:

divert management’s attention;
in costly and time-consuming litigation;
require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, which may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all; or
require us to redesign our software products to avoid infringement.

As a result, any third-party intellectual property claims against us could increase our expenses and impair our business. In addition, although we have licensed proprietary technology, we cannot be certain that the owners’ rights in such technology will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Furthermore, many of our customer agreements require us to indemnify our customers for certain third-party intellectual property infringement claims, which could increase our costs as a result of defending such claims and may require that we pay damages if there were an adverse ruling related to any such claims. These types of claims could harm our relationships with our customers, may deter future customers from purchasing our software products or could expose us to litigation for these claims. Even if we are not a party to any litigation between a customer and a third party, an adverse outcome in any such litigation could make it more difficult for us to defend our intellectual property in any subsequent litigation in which we are a named party.

The ExtenData acquisition closed in December 2020 and it may not achieve its intended benefits or may disrupt our plans and operations. The ExtenData acquisition was a significant acquisition for us, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully integrate ExtenData with and into our overall business or otherwise realize the expected benefits of the acquisition. We acquired ExtenData in December 2020 and our integration of ExtenData is ongoing, which may present additional costs and challenges to us in our integration of ExtenData’s operations. Our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition will depend, to a large extent, on our ability to integrate and utilize ExtenData’s operations with our existing business. The integration of two independent businesses may be a complex, costly and time-consuming process. Our business may be negatively impacted following the ExtenData acquisition if we are unable to effectively manage our expanded operations. The integration process will require significant time and focus from our management team following the acquisition and may divert attention from the day-to-day operations of the combined business.

The expected synergies and operating efficiencies of the ExtenData acquisition may not be fully realized, which could result in increased costs and/or lower revenues and have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, the overall integration of ExtenData’s business into those of the Company as a whole may result in material unanticipated problems, expenses, liabilities, competitive responses, loss of customer relationships and diversion of management’s attention, among other potential adverse consequences. Many risks associated with the ExtenData acquisition will be outside of our control and any one of them could result in increased costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenue and diversion of our management’s time and focus, which could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, even if our operations are integrated successfully with ExtenData’s, we may not realize the full benefits of the acquisition, including the synergies, operating efficiencies, or sales or growth opportunities that are expected. These benefits may not be achieved within the anticipated time frame or at all. All of these factors could cause dilution to our earnings per share, decrease or delay the expected benefits of the ExtenData acquisition, and/or negatively impact the market price of our common shares.

We may be subject to unknown or contingent liability related to ExtenData for which we may have no or limited recourse against the sellers to us. ExtenData may be subject to unknown or contingent liabilities for which we may have limited recourse against the sellers to us. Unknown or contingent liabilities might include liabilities for claims of customers, vendors or other persons dealing with ExtenData, tax liabilities and other liabilities, whether incurred in the ordinary course of business or otherwise. In addition, the total amount of costs and expenses that we may incur with respect to liabilities associated with ExtenData may exceed our expectations, which may materially and adversely affect us.

Future business combinations and acquisition transactions, if any, as well as recently closed business combinations and acquisition transactions, may not succeed in generating the intended benefits and may adversely affect our business. Part of our growth strategy is to evaluate strategic acquisitions or relationships from time to time. The inability of our management to successfully integrate acquired businesses or technologies, and any related diversion of management’s attention, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Business combinations and other acquisition transactions may have a direct adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or stock price. To complete acquisitions or other business combinations, we may have to use cash, issue new equity securities with dilutive effects on existing stockholders, take on new debt, assume contingent liabilities or amortize assets or expenses in a manner that might have a material adverse effect on our balance sheet, results of operations or liquidity. We are required to record business combination-related costs and other items as current period expenses, which would have the effect of reducing our reported earnings in the period in which an acquisition is consummated. These and other potential negative effects of an acquisition transaction could prevent us from realizing the benefits of such transaction and have a material adverse impact on our stock price, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

12

We must effectively manage the structure and size of our operations, or our company will suffer. Our ability to successfully implement our business plan requires an effective planning and management process. If funding is available, we intend to increase the scope of our operations and acquire complementary businesses. Implementing our business plan will require significant additional funding and resources. If we grow our operations, we will need to hire additional employees and make significant capital investments. If we grow our operations, it will place a significant strain on our existing management and resources. If we grow, we will need to improve our financial and managerial controls and reporting systems and procedures, and we will need to expand, train and manage our workforce. If we need to reduce the size of our infrastructure, we may need to do it swiftly. Any failure to manage any of the foregoing areas efficiently and effectively would cause our business to suffer.

We are heavily dependent on our senior management, and a loss of a member of our senior management team could cause our stock price to suffer.

If we lose members of our senior management, we may not be able to find appropriate replacements on a timely basis, and our business and value of our common stock could be adversely affected. Our existing operations and continued future development depend to a significant extent upon the performance and active participation of certain key individuals, including our Chief Executive Officer, Principalthe person performing the function of our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer,our Senior Vice Presidents and certain other senior management individuals. We cannot guarantee that we will be successful in retaining the services of these or other key personnel. If we were to lose any of these individuals, we may not be able to find appropriate replacements on a timely basis and our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In 2012, our former Chief Financial Officer, Donald Rowley, left the Company and was replaced with an Interim Chief Financial Officer, Paul Ross. On February 19, 2013, we appointed Dave Goodman as our new Chief Financial Officer.   Mr. Goodman resigned on May 17, 2013.  On May 23, 2013, Michael Roe was appointed as Principal Financial Officer.

We are increasingly dependent on information technology systems and infrastructure (cyber security)(cybersecurity).

We increasingly rely upon technology systems and infrastructure. Our technology systems are potentially vulnerable to breakdown or other interruption by fire, power loss, system malfunction, unauthorized access and other events such as computer hackings, cyber attacks,cyber-attacks, computer viruses, worms or other destructive or disruptive software. Likewise, data privacy breaches by employees and others with permitted access to our systems may pose a risk that sensitive data may be exposed to unauthorized persons or to the public. While we have invested heavily in the protection of data and information technology and in related training, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent significant breakdowns, breaches in our systems or other cyber incidents that could have a material adverse effect upon our reputation, business, operations or financial condition of the company. In addition, significant implementation issues may arise as we continue to consolidate and outsource certain computer operations and application support activities.

If our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings.

We review our goodwill and amortizable intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is required to be evaluated for impairment at least annually. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances indicating that the carrying value of our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets may not be recoverable include a decline in stock price and market capitalization, decrease in estimated future cash flows, and slower growth rates in our industry. We may be required to record a significant charge to earnings in our financial statements during the period in which any impairment of our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets is determined, resulting in a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

Our inability to hire, train and retain qualified employees could cause our financial condition to suffer.


The success of our business is highly dependent upon our ability to hire, train and retain qualified employees. We face competition from other employers for people, and the availability of qualified people is limited. We must offer a competitive employment package in order to hire and retain employees, and any increase in competition for people may require us to increase wages or benefits in order to maintain a sufficient work force, resulting in higher operation costs. Additionally, we must successfully train our employees in order to provide high quality services. In the event of high turnover or shortage of people, we may experience difficulty in providing consistent high-quality services. These factors could adversely affect our results of operations.

If$740,000 and $471,000, respectively (collectively, the “PPP Loan”), which were granted pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program of the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). At the time we are unableapplied for the loans, we believed the Company qualified to maintainreceive the effectivenessfunds pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program. A portion of the PPP Loan may be forgiven, as the proceeds were used for payroll costs, rent and utilities. In August 2020, we received $150,000 in connection with the U.S. Small Business Administration’s Economic Injury Disaster Loan program and this loan may impact the amount of forgiveness we may receive on our internal controls,PPP Loan. In applying for the PPP Loan, we were required to certify, among other things, that the current economic uncertainty made the PPP Loan necessary to support our ongoing operations. We made this certification in good faith after analyzing, among other things, our financial results may not be accurately reported.
Management’s assessmentsituation and access to alternative forms of capital, and believe that we satisfied all eligibility criteria for the PPP Loan, and that our receipt of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2012 reported that such controls and procedures were ineffective as a result of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related toPPP Loan is consistent with the supervision and review of our financial closing and reporting process and in our ability to account for complex transactions as described in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2012. The complex transactions related to purchase accounting for acquisitions made in 2012.  During the fourth quarter of 2012, we devoted significant time and resources to the remediationbroad objectives of the material weaknessPaycheck Protection Program of the CARES Act. The certification described above does not contain any objective criteria and is subject to interpretation. On April 23, 2020, the SBA issued guidance stating that included, but was not limited to:
·evaluating of Finance Department’s management and staff qualifications, which resulted in us making certain personnel changes in the Accounting and Finance department.
·Implementation of further process and control procedures surrounding review of significant transactions within the financial closing process
·Implementing new control procedures over the utilization of external resources
Although furtherit is unlikely that a public company with substantial market value and ongoing effortsaccess to capital markets will continuebe able to make the required certification in 2013good faith. The lack of clarity regarding loan eligibility under the Paycheck Protection Program has resulted in significant media coverage and beyond to enhance our internal control over financial reporting, we believe that our remediation efforts now provide the foundation for compliance.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting cannot guarantee the prevention or detection of a material weakness, we can never guarantee a material weakness over financial reporting will not occur, includingcontroversy with respect to any previously reported material weaknesses. Any future material weakness could result in material misstatements inpublic companies applying for and receiving loans. If, despite our financial statements or cause us to fail to meetgood-faith belief at the time of our reporting obligations. In addition, ifapplication that we satisfied all eligibility requirements for the PPP Loan, we are unablelater determined to certifyhave violated any of the laws or governmental regulations that our internal control over financial reportingapply to us in connection with the PPP Loan, such as the False Claims Act, or it is effective,otherwise determined that we were ineligible to receive the PPP Loan, we may be subject to sanctionscivil, criminal and administrative penalties. In addition, receipt of a PPP Loan may result in adverse publicity and damage to reputation, and a review or investigationsaudit by regulatory authorities such as the SEC,SBA or other government entity or claims under the False Claims Act could consume significant financial and wemanagement resources. Any of these events could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would materially harmhave a material adverse effect on our business, the priceresults of our common stockoperations and our ability to access the capital markets.financial condition.

13

Our Net Operating Loss Carryforwards may be limited.
Pursuant to Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 382, annual use of our Federal net operating loss carryforwards may be limited in the event a cumulative change in ownership of our company of more than fifty percent occurs within a three-year period.  In addition, IRC Section 382 may limit our built-in items of deduction, including capitalized start-up costs and research and development costs.  We have completed an IRC 382 analysis regarding the limitation of our net operating loss carryforwards as of December 31, 2012.   At December 31, 2012, we had Federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $5.9 million. Of this amount, approximately $5.1 million is available after the application of IRC Section 382 limitations.

RISKS RELATEDRELATING TO OUR COMMON STOCK

SECURITIES AND THIS OFFERING

There has been a limited trading market for our common stock.

Currently, our common stock is available for quotation on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin BoardOTC Pink Market under the symbol “DPSI.” ItWe may attempt to cause our common stock to be quoted on the OTCQB Venture Market (or, the OTCQX, or, later a national stock exchange), however, each of the OTC Pink Market and the OTCQB Venture Market is anticipated that there willgenerally understood to be a limitedless active, and therefore less liquid, trading market than a national securities exchange. We cannot predict whether an active market for theour common stock onwill ever develop in the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board.future. The lack of an active market may impair your ability to sell your shares at the time you wish to sell them or at a price that you consider reasonable. The lack of an active market may also reduce the fair market value of your shares. An inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling shares of capital stock and may impair our ability to acquire other companies or technologies by using common stock as consideration.

We may pay dividends on our Series D Preferred Stock in shares of Series D Preferred Stock, valued based on the trading price of our common stock, which would result in dilution to current stockholders.
Our Series D Preferred Stock entitles the holder to cumulative dividends, payable quarterly, at an annual rate of (i) 8% of the Stated Value of $1.00 during the three year period commencing on the date of issue, and (ii) 12% of the Stated Value commencing three years after the date of issue. We may, at our option, pay dividends in shares of Series D Preferred Stock (“PIK Shares”), in which event the applicable dividend rate will be 12% and the number of such PIK Shares issuable will be equal to the aggregate dividend payable divided by the lesser of (x) the then effective Conversion Price (currently $0.90) or (y) the average volume weighted average price (“VWAP”) of the Company’s common stock for the five prior consecutive trading days. Accordingly, if the VWAP of our common stock for the applicable measuring period is below $0.90, the number of shares issuable as PIK shares will vary with such VWAP.
The following table sets forth, for illustrative purposes, the number of shares of Series D Preferred Stock we would issue if we were to elect to pay dividends on the Series D Preferred Stock in 2013, at different VWAP’s. The PIK shares are convertible into such number of shares of our common stock equal to the number of shares of Series D Preferred Stock to be converted, multiplied by the Stated Value, and divided by the Conversion Price in effect at the time of the conversion.
VWAP  Number of PIK shares issuable in 2013 
$0.90   101,135 
$0.80   114,470 
$0.60   155,398 
If we issue common stock at a price less than the conversion price then in effect, the conversion price of the Series D Preferred Stock will be reduced and will potentially cause additional common to be issued upon Series D Preferred Stock conversion.

Our Series D Preferred Stock entitles the holder certain anti-dilution rights upon subsequent issuances of common stock which is less than the conversion price then in effect (which was initially $1.00) of the Series D Preferred Stock.

As of August 15, 2013, we entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with accredited investors (the “Investors”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,756,400. Closings were held as of August 15, 2013 and August 21, 2013. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, we sold an aggregate of 2,927,333 Units, each Unit consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase one-half of one share of common stock (the “Investor Warrants”), for a purchase price of $0.60 per Unit, such that we sold an aggregate of 2,927,333 shares of common stock (the “Common Shares”) and 1,463,667 Investor Warrants for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,756,400 (the “Private Placement”). The Investor Warrants have a five-year term and an exercise price of $1.00 per share.  The placement Agent Warrants have a five-year term and an exercise price of $0.60 per share. As a result, the exercise price of the Series D Preferred Stock was reduced from $1.00 per share to $0.90 per share.  If all Series D Preferred Stock is converted an additional 782,444 shares of common stock will be issued further diluting existing common stockholders and holders of Series D Preferred warrants and Investor Warrants.
Placement Agent Warrants and Investor Warrants contain certain anti-dilution and price adjustment provisions

In connection with the closings on August 15, 2013 and August 21, 2013, warrants issued to the placement agent and investors contained certain anti-dilution (“down-round”) protection. If at any time while the Placement Agent Warrants or Investor Warrant is outstanding, we shall sell or grant any option to purchase, or sell or grant any right to reprice, or otherwise dispose of or issue any common stock or common stock equivalent, at an effective price per share less than the exercise price of the Placement Agent Warrant or Investor Warrant then in effect, the exercise price of the Placement Agent Warrant and Investor Warrant shall be reduced to the base share price of the newly issued common stock or common stock equivalent. If all Placement Agent Warrants or Investor Warrants are converted to common stock at an exercise price less than the conversion price then in effect, additional shares of common stock will be issued further diluting existing common stockholders and holders of Series D Preferred warrants.

The market price for our common stock may be volatile, and your investment in our common stock could decline in value.

The market price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly in response to various factors and events, including:

the lack of an established trading market for our common stock;
our ability to integrate operations, technology, products and services;
our ability to execute itsthe Company’s business plan;
operating results below expectations;
our issuance of additional securities, including debt or equity or a combination thereof, which willmay be necessary to fund our operating expenses;
• announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors;
• the loss of any strategic relationship;
• economic and other external factors;
• period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results; and
• whether an active trading market in the capital stock develops and is maintained.

In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our capitalcommon stock.

In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against companies that experience volatility in the market price of their securities. Whether or not meritorious, litigation brought against us could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

We expect that our quarterly results of operations will fluctuate, and this fluctuation could cause our stock price to decline.

Our quarterly operating results are likely to fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations could cause our stock price to decline. The nature of our business involves variable factors such as the timing of the research, development and regulatory pathways of our product candidates, which could cause our operating results to fluctuate.

Due to the possibility of fluctuations in our revenues and expenses, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results at times are not a good indication of our future performance.

14

If we or our existing shareholdersstockholders sell a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, including as part of this offering, our stock price may decline.

If we ordecline even if our existing shareholders sellbusiness is doing well. Sales of a largesubstantial number of shares of our common stock orin the public market, perceivesincluding pursuant to this offering, or the perception in the market that we or our existing shareholders mightthe holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares of common stock, particularly(particularly with respect to our affiliates, directors, executive officers or other insiders,insiders), could depress the market price of our common stock and could impair our future ability to obtain capital, especially through an offering of equity securities. If there are more shares of common stock offered for sale than buyers are willing to purchase, then the market price of our common stock may decline significantly.
to a market price at which buyers are willing to purchase the offered shares of common stock and sellers remain willing to sell the shares.

In the future, we may issue additional shares to our employees, directors or consultants, under our equity compensation plan, in connection with corporate alliances or acquisitions, or to raise capital. Due to these factors, sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could occur at any time.

Our common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC and the trading market in our securities is limited, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our stock.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require:

that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks; and
the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:

obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and
make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:

sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and
that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.

Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our common stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

FINRA sales practice requirements may also limit a shareholder’sstockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

15


Although we may seek to list our common stock on a national securities exchange, there is no assurance that our common stock will ever be listed on a national securities exchange. While we may explore attempting to list our common stock on a national securities exchange, we cannot ensure that we will be able to satisfy the listing standards or that our common stock will be accepted for listing on any such exchange. Should we fail to satisfy the initial listing standards of such exchanges, or our common stock are otherwise rejected for listing, our common stock will continue to trade on the OTC Pink Market (or, potentially the OTCQB Venture Market or the OTCQX), in which event the trading price of our common stock could suffer, the trading market for our common stock may be less liquid, and our common stock price may be subject to increased volatility.

Even if our common stock is later accepted for listing on a national securities exchange upon our satisfaction of the exchange’s initial listing criteria, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained, and the exchange may subsequently delist our common stock if we fail to comply with ongoing listing standards. In the event we are able to list our common stock on a national securities exchange upon our satisfaction of the exchange’s initial listing criteria, the exchange will require us to meet certain financial, public float, bid price and liquidity standards on an ongoing basis in order to continue the listing of our common stock. In addition to specific listing and maintenance standards, we expect any national securities exchange on which our common stock may become listed will have broad discretionary authority over the initial and continued listing of securities, which it could exercise with respect to the listing of our common stock.

If we fail to meet these continued listing requirements, our common stock may be subject to delisting. If our common stock is delisted and we are not able to list our common stock on another national securities exchange, we expect our securities would be quoted on an over-the-counter market; However, if this were to occur, our stockholders could face significant material adverse consequences, including limited availability of market quotations for our common stock and reduced liquidity for the trading of our securities. In addition, in the event of such delisting, we could experience a decreased ability to issue additional securities and obtain additional financing in the future.

Further, even if our common stock is ever listed on a national securities exchange, there can be no assurance that an active trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained after our initial listing.

If securities analysts do not publish research or publish unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline. The trading market for a company’s common stock often is based in part on the research and reports that securities and industry analysts publish about the company. We are not currently aware of any well-known analysts that are covering our common stock, and without analyst coverage it could be hard to generate interest in investments in our common stock. Furthermore, if analyst coverage does develop, and an analyst downgrades our stock or publishes unfavorable research about our business, or if our clinical trials or operating results fail to meet the analysts’ expectations, our stock price would likely decline.

We do not anticipate paying dividends on our common stock.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not expect to do so in the foreseeable future. The declaration of dividends is subject to the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on various factors, including our operating results, financial condition, future prospects, covenants in documents governing our debt obligations and any other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. You should not rely on an investment in our company if you require dividend income from your investment in our company. The success of your investment will likely depend entirely upon any future appreciation of the market price of our common stock, which is uncertain and unpredictable. There is no guarantee that our common stock will appreciate in value.

16

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law, could discourage, delay, or prevent a change in control of our company and may affect the trading price of our common stock.

We are a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law may discourage, delay, or prevent a change in control by prohibiting us from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years after the person becomes an interested stockholder, even if a change in control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders.

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (the “Charter”), and our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) may discourage, delay, or prevent a change in our management or control over us that stockholders may consider favorable. Our Charter and Bylaws:

provide that vacancies on our board of directors, including newly created directorships, may be filled only by a majority vote of directors then in office;
do not provide stockholders with the ability to cumulate their votes; and
require advance notification of stockholder nominations and proposals.

In addition, our Charter permits the Board to issue up to 10 million shares of preferred stock with such powers, rights, terms and conditions as may be designated by the Board upon the issuance of shares of preferred stock at one or more times in the future. Specifically, the Charter permits the Board to approve the future issuance of all or any shares of the preferred stock in one or more series, to determine the number of shares constituting any series and to determine any voting powers, conversion rights, dividend rights, and other designations, preferences, limitations, restrictions and rights relating to such shares without any further authorization by our stockholders. The Board’s power to issue preferred stock could have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a transaction or a change in control of our company that might otherwise be in the best interest of our stockholders.

17

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This prospectus contains “forward-looking statements”. Forward-lookingforward-looking statements reflectthat are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to management. Some of the current view about future events. When usedstatements in the section captioned “Prospectus Summary,” “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Description of Business,” and elsewhere in this prospectus the wordscontain forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify these statements by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “future,“expects,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would” or the negative of these terms or other comparable expressions that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes, although not all forward-looking statements contain these terms.

These statements involve risks, uncertainties and similar expressions, as they relateother factors that may cause actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to usbe materially different from the information expressed or our management, identifyimplied by these forward-looking statements. SuchForward-looking statements in this prospectus include, but are not limited to, statements contained inabout:

our plans to obtain funding for our current and proposed operations and potential acquisition and expansion efforts;
the ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, or any other health epidemic, on our business, our clientele or the global economy as a whole;
debt obligations of the Company;
our general history of operating losses;
our ability to compete with companies producing products and services;
the scope of protection we are able to establish and maintain for intellectual property rights covering our products and technology;
the accuracy of our estimates regarding expenses, future revenue, capital requirements and needs for additional financing;
our ability to develop and maintain our corporate infrastructure, including our internal controls;
our ability to develop innovative new products; and
our financial performance.

In addition, you should refer to the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus relating to our business strategy, our future operating results and liquidity and capital resources outlook. Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy andfor a discussion of other future conditions. Because forward–looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees of assurance of future performance. We caution you therefore against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. Importantimportant factors that couldmay cause actual results to differ materially from those inexpressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. As a result of these factors, we cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements include, without limitation,in this prospectus will prove to be accurate. Furthermore, if the forward-looking statements prove to be inaccurate, the inaccuracy may be material. In light of the significant uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not regard these statements as a continued declinerepresentation or warranty by us or any other person that we will achieve our objectives and plans in general economic conditions nationallyany specified time frame, or at all. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

In addition, statements that “we believe” and internationally; decreased demand forsimilar statements reflect our productsbeliefs and services; market acceptanceopinions on the relevant subject. These statements are based upon information available to us as of our products and services; our ability to protect our intellectual property rights; the impact of any infringement actions or other litigation brought against us; competition from other providers and products; our ability to develop and commercialize new and improved products and services; our ability to raise capital to fund continuing operations; changes in government regulation; our ability to complete customer transactions and capital raising transactions; and other factors (including the risks contained in the sectiondate of this prospectus, entitled “Risk Factors”) relating to our industry, our operations and results of operations and any businesses thatwhile we believe such information forms a reasonable basis for such statements, such information may be acquired by us. Should onelimited or moreincomplete, and our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into, or review of, all potentially available relevant information. These statements are inherently uncertain and investors are cautioned not to unduly rely upon these risks or uncertainties materialize, orstatements.

You should read this prospectus and the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may differ significantly from those anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended or planned.

Factors or eventsdocuments that could causewe reference in this prospectus and have filed as exhibits to the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part with the understanding that our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.  Except as requiredand achievements may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by applicable law, including thethese cautionary statements.

18

Description of Capital Stock

This section summarizes our authorized and outstanding securities lawsand certain of the United States, we do not undertake to update anyprovisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and our Bylaws.

General

The Company’s authorized capital stock consists of 60,000,000 shares of capital stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which 50,000,000 shares are common stock, par value $0.001 per share and 10,000,000 shares are preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of January 11, 2021, the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any proceeds from the saleCompany had 13,576,223 shares of common stock offeredoutstanding held by approximately 330 stockholders of record, and no shares of preferred stock outstanding.

On July 23, 2020, our board of directors unanimously approved, and recommended that our stockholders approve, a potential amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation that will give our board the selling stockholders under this prospectus.


MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Our common stock is currently quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol “DPSI .”  There was no trading in our stock throughdiscretion, until June 30, 2009.

The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid prices for our common stock for each of the periods indicated as reported by the OTC BB.  These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. 
  High  Low 
       
First Quarter of 2011 $3.24  $1.50 
Second Quarter of 2011 $3.25  $2.22 
Third Quarter of 2011 $2.50  $1.85 
Fourth Quarter of 2011 $2.10  $0.50 
         
First Quarter of 2012 $1.64  $0.65 
Second Quarter of 2012 $1.54  $0.90 
Third Quarter of 2012 $1.35  $0.71 
Fourth Quarter of 2012 $1.25  $0.55 
         
First Quarter of 2013 $1.26  $    0.81 
Second Quarter of 2013 $1.30  $      0.70 
Third Quarter of 2013 (as of September 18, 2013) $1.00  $0.49 
On September 18, 2013, the closing bid price2021, to effect a reverse split of our common stock as reported on the OTC Bulletin Board was $0.72 per share.

Number of Stockholders

As of September 18, 2013, there were approximately 659 holders of recordwhereby each outstanding 3 or 4 shares may be combined, converted and changed into one share of our common stock.
Dividend Policy
our board (the “Reverse Stock Split Charter Amendment”). The consenting stockholders, likewise, approved the Reverse Stock Split Charter Amendment by written consent in August 2020.

Pursuant to the authority provided by the consenting stockholders, our Board will have the sole discretion, until June 30, 2021, to elect whether to effect the reverse stock split and, if so, the number of shares— between 3 and 4—of our common stock which will be combined into one share of our common stock. If the board determines to effect one of the alternative Reverse Stock Split Charter Amendment, the Certificate of Incorporation would be amended accordingly.

If the board elects to effect the reverse stock split, the number of issued and outstanding shares of our common stock would be reduced in accordance with a reverse split ratio selected by the board from among the approved ratios described above. Except for adjustments that may result from the treatment of fractional shares as described below, each stockholder will hold the same percentage of outstanding common stock immediately following the reverse stock split as such stockholder held immediately prior to the reverse stock split. The Reverse Stock Split Charter Amendment would not change the number of authorized shares of our common stock.

Common Stock

The holders of our common stock are entitledstock: (i) have equal ratable rights to receive dividends if and when declared by our Board of Directors out offrom funds legally available, for distribution.  Any such dividends may be paid in cash, property or shares of our common stock.

We have not paid any dividends on our common stock since our inception, and it is not likely that any dividends on our common stock will be declared in the foreseeable future.  Any dividends will be subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors, and will depend upon, among other things, our operating and financial condition and our capital requirements and general business conditions.
Preferred Stock - The holders of the Series A and Series B Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive,therefore, when, as and if declared by our Board; (ii) are entitled to share in all of our assets available for distribution to holders of common stock upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs; (iii) do not have preemptive, subscription or conversion rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions or rights; and (iv) are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share on all matters on which stockholders may vote. 

Preferred Stock

The Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. There is no preferred stock outstanding. Our Board may designate the Board of Directors, dividends at an annual rate of 8%rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of the stated value.  Dividends shall be cumulative and shall accrue on each share of the outstanding Series A and B Preferred Stock from the date of its issue. Cumulative, undeclared dividends on our Series A Preferred and Series B Preferred Shares totaled $324,000 and $78,000 at June 30, 2013, respectively.

The Series D Preferred Stock entitles the holder to cumulative dividends, payable quarterly, at an annual rate of (i) 8% of the Stated Value during the three year period commencing on the date of issue, and (ii) 12% of the Stated Value commencing three years after the date of issue. We may, at our option, pay dividends in PIK Shares, in which event the applicablepreferred stock, including dividend rate will be 12%rights, conversion rights, voting rights, redemption rights, liquidation preference, sinking fund terms and the number of such PIK Shares issuable will be equal toshares constituting any series or the aggregate dividend payable divided bydesignation of any series. The issuance of preferred stock could have the lessereffect of (x)restricting dividends on the then effective Conversion Pricecommon stock, diluting the voting power of the common stock, impairing the liquidation rights of the common stock or (y)delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control. Such issuance could have the average volume weighted averageeffect of decreasing the market price of the Company’scommon stock. We currently have no plans to issue any shares of preferred stock.

19

Non-cumulative Voting

Holders of shares of our common stock for the five prior consecutive trading days. On April 16, 2013, wedo not have cumulative voting rights.

Dividends

We have not paid aany cash dividends to stockholders.  The declaration of any future cash dividend will be at the discretion of $154,186 onour Board and will depend upon our earnings, if any, our capital requirements and financial position, our general economic conditions, restrictive covenants in our loan documents, and other pertinent conditions.  Currently, our credit agreement with Pacific Western Business Finance prohibits us from, among other things, paying dividends without the Series D Preferred Stock forlender’s prior consent. It is our present intention not to pay any cash dividends in the period from the dates of issueforeseeable future, but rather to March 31, 2013. On July 16, 2013, the Company paid a cash dividend of $140,454 on the Series D preferred Stock for the period from April 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013.


reinvest earnings, if any, in our business operations.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans


In December 2010,

As of the date of this prospectus, we establishedhad issued (or committed to issue) an aggregate of 967,882 options to purchase shares of our common stock pursuant to the 2010 Stock OptionAmended 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”“2014 Plan”).  The Plan authorizes the issuance of 1,000,000 and 1,232,118 shares of our common stock. Pursuantstock remain available for future grant or issuance under the 2014 Plan.

In September 2016, the Company amended the 2014 Plan to increase the number the shares of Common Stock reserved under the 2014 Plan to 1,200,000 shares. In August 2020, our stockholders approved an amendment to the terms2014 that served to increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved under the Merger Agreement, we assumed all of Old DecisionPoint’s obligations under their outstanding stock option plans.


2014 Plan to 2,200,000 shares.

Under the 2014 Plan, common stock incentives may be granted to officers, employees, directors, consultants, and advisors.  Asadvisors (and prospective directors, officers, managers, employees, consultants and advisors) of June 30, 2013 , incentives under the Company and its affiliates can acquire and maintain an equity interest in the Company, or be paid incentive compensation, which may (but need not) be measured by reference to the value of the Company’s common stock.

The 2014 Plan may be granted onlypermits the Company to provide equity-based compensation in the form of non-statutory stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, unrestricted stock and allother stock options of Old DecisionPoint that were assumed by us became non-statutory options on the date of the assumption.


bonus awards and performance compensation awards.

The 2014 Plan is administered by ourthe Board of Directors, or a committee appointed by ourthe Board of Directors, which determines recipients and the number of shares subject to the awards, the exercise price and the vesting schedule.  The term of stock options granted under the Plan cannot exceed ten years.  Options shall not have an exercise price less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date, and generally vest over a period of five years.  If the individual possesses more than 10% of the combined voting power of all classes of our stock, the exercise price shall not be less than 110% of the fair market of a share of common stock on the date of grant.

Provided below is information regarding our equity compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2012 subject to our available authorized shares. 
Plan CategoryNumber of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants, and rights  Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options  Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) 
  (a)  (b)  (c) 
          
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  544,505  $1.82   455,495 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  -   -   - 
Total  544,505  $1.82   455,495 
             
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Forward Looking Statements

You should read the following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation together with the financial statements and the related notes included in this prospectus.  
In addition, some of the statements contained in this prospectus that are not historical facts are "forward-looking statements" which can be identified by the use of terminology such as "estimates," "projects," "plans," "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "intends," or the negative or other variations, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties.  We urge you to be cautious of the forward-looking statements, that such statements, which are contained in this prospectus, reflect our current beliefs with respect to future events and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors affecting our operations, market growth, services, products and licenses.  No assurances can be given regarding the achievement of future results, as actual results may differ materially as a result of the risks we face, and actual events may differ from the assumptions underlying the statements that have been made regarding anticipated events.  Factors that may cause actual results, our performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include, without limitation:

●           Our ability to raise capital when needed and on acceptable terms and conditions;
●           Our ability to manage the growth of our business through internal growth and acquisitions;
●           The intensity of competition;
●           General economic conditions and,
●           Our ability to attract and retain management, and to integrate and maintain technical information and management information systems.
All written and oral forward-looking statements made in connection with this prospectus that are attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements.  Given the uncertainties that surround such statements, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.  Except as may be required under applicable securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result more information, future events or occurrences.
Overview

DecisionPoint enables our clients to “move decisions closer to the customer” by “empowering the mobile worker”. We define the mobile worker as those individuals that are on the front line in direct contact with customers. These workers include field repair technicians, sales associates, couriers, public safety employees and millions of other workers that deliver goods and or services throughout the country. Whether they are blue or white collar, mobile workers have many characteristics in common.  Mobile workers need information, access to corporate resources, decision support tools and the ability to capture and report information back to the organization.
DecisionPoint empowers these mobile workers through the implementation of various mobile technologies including specialized mobile business applications, wireless networks, mobile computers (for example, rugged, tablets, and smartphones) and a comprehensive suite of consulting, integration, deployment and support services.
Mobile computing capabilities and usage continue to grow. With choice comes complexity so helping our customers navigate the myriad of options is what we do best. The right choice may be an off-the-shelf application or a custom business application to fit a very specific business process. DecisionPoint has the specialized resources and support structure to address the needs of mobile applications in the retail, transportation, field workforce sales/service and the warehousing market segments. We continue to invest in building out our capabilities to support these markets and business needs. For example, in July 2012, we invested in the expansion of our custom software development capabilities through the acquisition of Illume Mobile in Tulsa, OK, which specializes in the custom development of specialized mobile business applications for Apple, Android and Windows Mobile devices. Additionally, through the acquisition of Illume Mobile we acquired a cloud-based, horizontal software application “ContentSentral” which manages and distributes multiple types of corporate content (for example, PDF, video, images, and spreadsheets) on mobile tablets used by field workers.  We also dramatically increased our software products expertise with the acquisition in June 2012 of APEX in Canada. The APEXWare™ software suite significantly expanded our field sales/service software offerings.  APEXWare™ is a purpose-built mobile application suite ideally suited to the automation of field sales/service and warehouse workers.  Additionally, we continue to expand our deployment and MobileCare support offerings. In 2012 we moved our headquarters location to a larger facility in Irvine, CA in order to accommodate the expansion of our express depot and technical support organizations. We also continue to invest in our “MobileCare EMM” enterprise mobility management offering.  In 2008, we recognized the need for customers to outsource their mobile device management (“MDM”) needs, thus we invested in building out a MDM practice that offers these services under a comprehensive managed service model. We have extended this offering from our historically ruggedized mobile computer customer base to address the growth of consumer devices in the enterprise and support the Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Bring Your Own Application (BYOA) movement.
Recognizing that we cannot build every business application, we have developed an ‘ecosystem’ of partners which support our custom and off-the-shelf solutions. These partners include suppliers of mobile devices (Apple, Intermec, Motorola, among others), wireless carriers (AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, Verizon),  mobile peripheral manufactures (Zebra Technologies Corporation, Datamax - O’Neil), in addition to a host of specialized independent software vendors such as AirWatch, VeriFone GlobalBay, XRS and Wavelink.
We are focused on several commercial enterprise markets. These include retail, field sales/service, warehousing and distribution and transportation. With the continued growth of the mobile internet, we expect to see our current markets growth in addition to the emergence of new markets.  In order to identify these new markets we recently created a new internal organization whose sole purpose is to identify and nurture new market opportunities. We expect our customers to continue to embrace and deploy new technology to better enhance their own customers’ experiences and improve their own operations while lowering their operating costs.  Our expertise and understanding of our customers’ operations and business operations in general, coupled with our expertise and understanding of mobile technology equipment and software offerings enables us to identify new trends and opportunities and provide these new solutions to our existing and potential customers.
At DecisionPoint, we deliver to our customers the ability to make better, faster and more accurate business decisions by implementing industry-specific, enterprise wireless and mobile computing systems for their front-line mobile workers, inside and outside of the traditional workplace. It is these systems that provide the information to improve the hundreds of individual business decisions made each day. Historically, critical information has remained locked away in the organization’s enterprise computing systems, accessible only when employees were at their desks. Our solutions unlock this information and deliver it to employees when needed regardless of their location.  As a result, our customers are able to move their business decision points closer to their customers which we believe in turn improves customer service levels, reduces cost and accelerates business growth.
We have several offices throughout North America which allows us to serve our multi-location clients and their mobile workforces.  We provide depot services through our West and East coast facilities. Additionally, we are always keenly aware of potential acquisition candidates that can provide complementary products and service offerings to our customer base.
The Merger
On June 15, 2011, pursuant to the Merger (see “Business”), we acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Old DecisionPoint from its shareholders in exchange for 4,593,660 shares of our common stock, resulting in an exchange ratio of one share for every eight shares of common stock tendered (1:8). We also acquired all of Old DecisionPoint’s issued and outstanding Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares and Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares in exchange for 243,750 and 118,750 of Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares, respectively. Immediately after the Merger, there were 6,934,412 shares of common stock outstanding and 243,750 and 118,750 shares of Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares and Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares outstanding, respectively. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, we assumed all of Old DecisionPoint’s obligations under their outstanding stock option plans and warrant agreements. Two of our directors retained their positions and the remaining positions were filled by the directors and officers of Old DecisionPoint.  In connection with and upon the Effective Date of the Merger, we issued 153,883 additional common shares as payment for a finder’s fee. The shares were valued at $2.30 per share, the closing share price on the Effective Date, for total consideration of $353,931. The finder’s fee and other expenses have been accounted for as costs of the Merger in the accompanying consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity in Form 10-K included elsewhere in this Prospectus. On November 8, 2011, we entered into an agreement with the finder pursuant to which the finder returned all of the aforementioned shares of our stock in exchange for $250,000 in cash. The agreement was approved by the Board of Directors. The value of the shares on the date of the agreement was $1.33 and as such, $204,664 has been recorded as treasury stock for accounting purposes. The remaining $45,336 has been reflected as a charge in the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011. Other expenses related to the Merger totaled $376,547.

The estimated fair values of the financial assets received and liabilities assumed from Comamtech in the Merger are comprised of the following as of June 15, 2011:
    
Cash $2,361,742 
Note receivable  100,000 
Other receivables  1,488,850 
Other curent assets  150,545 
Accounts payable  (153,450)
     
Net asset value $3,947,687 
     
The other receivables are comprised of a $1,500,000 payment due from the sale of a business by Comamtech to a publicly traded company and another miscellaneous receivable of $49,732. The $1,500,000 receivable was collected in May 2012. We estimated the fair value of this receivable by calculating the present value of the expected cash payment using a credit risk adjusted interest rate of 4.6%. The fair value of the receivable is $1,476,285 as of December 31, 2011, and is included in other receivables in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 in Form 10-K included elsewhere in this Prospectus.
The note receivable represented approximately $4.4 million due from the sale of a business by Comamtech to a private company (“Empresario”).  The note was secured by the assets of Empresario and was guaranteed by its principal shareholder.  To accommodate Empresario’s inability to perform, the note was restructured several times by Comamtech prior to the Merger.  Empresario defaulted on the amended terms on August 10, 2011, and we sent Empresario a demand for payment.  At that time, Empresario had not been able to secure a viable path for repayment and, based on all of the information available at the time, we had assessed the financial health and capitalization of Empresario along with its claim paying ability as being very poor.  Accordingly, we estimated the fair value of the note receivable to be $100,000 as of the effective date of the Merger.
On September 2, 2011, we entered into a transfer and payment agreement (the “Transfer Agreement”) among the Company, Empresario, and its sole shareholder.  Pursuant to the Transfer Agreement, Empresario paid the Company $530,000, and we transferred to Empresario its right, title and interest in the Purchased Assets, as defined by the Asset Purchase Agreement dated May 14, 2009, between Comamtech and Empresario (“the Purchase Agreement”).  The convertible secured debenture, dated August 10, 2010, between Empresario and Comamtech, in the original amount of $4,411,186 was cancelled and terminated.  The guarantee, dated May 14, 2009, among Comamtech, Empresario, and the sole shareholder, pursuant to which the sole shareholder guaranteed certain obligations under the Purchase Agreement, was cancelled and terminated.  Costs incurred to complete the Transfer Agreement totaled $130,000, of which $100,000 was due to Robert Chaiken, a Director of the Company, for services related to negotiating the Transfer Agreement.  Of that amount, $42,152 was paid in cash and on September 30, 2011, we issued Mr. Chaiken 26,906 shares of common stock valued at $57,848 as payment in full.  The remaining costs were legal and other professional services to complete the Transfer.
The difference between the estimated fair value of the note receivable of $100,000 and the payment of $530,000, reduced by a $130,000 in costs to complete the Transfer, approximated $300,000 and was recorded as other income in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 in Form 10-K included elsewhere in this Prospectus.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, on or before August 25, 2011, we were to have an audit performed on the balance sheet of Comamtech as of June 15, 2011 (the “Opening Balance Sheet”). Prior to August 25, 2011, we prepared a statement (the “Purchase Price Statement”) setting forth our good faith computation of the shareholders’ equity of Comamtech as of August 15, 2011. During August 2011, both parties accepted the Purchase Price Statement and agreed to forego an audit.
Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, if the final shareholders’ equity balance reflected in the Opening Balance Sheet was less than $7,233,000, then the shareholders of Old DecisionPoint at the date of the Merger were entitled to receive, on a pro rata basis, common shares according to a schedule set forth in the Merger Agreement. The final shareholders’ equity balance reflected in the Opening Balance Sheet was $3,947,687 (see table above) and as a result, we issued the maximum number of additional common shares of 487,310 to the Old DecisionPoint shareholders on September 30, 2011. These shares were included in total common shares issued and outstanding as of the Effective Date of the transaction, as reflected in our Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011. This had the effect of reducing the exchange ratio from one for every eight shares tendered (1:8) to one for every seven point two three shares tendered (1:7.23273).  The additional common shares have been accounted for as a reduction in the exchange ratio for all other securities, including the preferred stock, stock options and warrants to purchase shares of our securities.
As a result, after the adjustment to the exchange ratio, we had acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Old DecisionPoint from its shareholders by exchanging 36,749,286 of Old DecisionPoint common shares for 5,080,970 shares of our common stock and by exchanging 975 and 380 shares of Old DecisionPoint Series A and Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares, for 269,608 and 131,347 shares of our Series A and Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares, respectively.
Business Combinations

Illume Mobile Acquisition

On July 31, 2012 (“Illume Closing Date”), we consummated an asset purchase agreement (“Asset Purchase Agreement”) with MacroSolve, Inc. Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, we purchased the business (including substantially all the related assets) of the seller’s Illume Mobile division (“Illume Mobile”), based in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

Founded in 1996, Illume Mobile is a mobile business solutions provider that services mobile products and platforms. Illume Mobile’s initial core business is the development and integration of business applications for mobile environments. Today, Illume Mobile serves the mobile application development needs of a wide range of customers, from Fortune 500s to small and medium-sized businesses. It delivers advanced, mobile apps for many device platforms including iPad, iPhone and Android with functionality including 3D animation, mobile video, augmented reality, GPS, and more. Illume Mobile seeks to leverage its combination of creativity, technical savvy, years of mobile experience, and market insight to enable customers to envision their mobile applications and bring them to reality, providing the most value in the shortest amount of time. For more information regarding this acquisition,      (see “Note 4 – Business Combinations” in the accompanying Notes to Form 10-Q Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus for additional details) .
Apex Systems Integrators Acquisition

On June 4, 2012 (“Closing Date”), pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”), we acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Apex Systems Integrators Inc. (“Apex”), a corporation organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada. Apex is a provider of wireless mobile work force software solutions. Its suite of products utilizes the latest technologies to empower the mobile worker in many areas including merchandising, sales and delivery; field service; logistics and transportation; and, warehouse management. Its clients are North American companies that are household names whose products and services are used daily to feed, transport, entertain and care for people throughout the world. For more information regarding this acquisition, see     “Note 4 – Business Combinations ”    in the accompanying Notes to Form 10-Q Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus for additional details    .

The operating results of Illume Mobile have been included in our results of operations beginning August 1, 2012 and operating results of Apex have been included in our results of operations beginning June 5, 2012.
Pro Forma Disclosure of Financial Information (unaudited)

The following table summarizes our unaudited consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 as if the Apex and Illume acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2012 (in thousands except per share data):

  Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
  June 30, 2012  June 30, 2012 
             
  As Reported  Pro Forma  As Reported  Pro Forma 
             
Net sales $17,767  $18,497  $35,577  $37,677 
Net loss attributable to common shareholders  (1,523)  (2,325)  (1,982)  (3,866)
                 
Net loss per share - basic and diluted  (0.20)  (0.27)  (0.27)  (0.46)

Included in the pro forma combined results of operations are the following adjustments for Apex: (i) amortization of intangible assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 of $229,000 and $572,000, respectively, (ii) a net increase in interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 of $116,000 and $291,000, respectively.

Included in the pro forma combined results of operations are the following adjustments for Illume Mobile: (i) amortization of intangible assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 of $53,000 and $106,000, respectively.  Net loss per share assumes the 325,000 shares issued in connection with the Apex acquisition and the 617,284 shares issued in connection with the Illume Mobile acquisition are outstanding for each period presented (see “Note 4 – Business Combinations” in the accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
The following table summarizes our unaudited consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, as if the Apex and Illume acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2011 (in thousands):
  December 31, 
  2012  2011  2012  2011 
  as reported  pro forma 
             
Net sales $71,501  $58,359  $73,703  $62,024 
Net loss attributable to common shareholders  (4,820)  (5,654)  (6,887)  (8,441)
                 
Net loss per share - basic and diluted  (0.61)  (0.94)  (0.87)  (1.21)
Included in the pro forma combined results of operations are the following adjustments for Apex: (i) amortization of intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 of $572,000 and $1,392,000, respectively, (ii) a net increase in interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 of $291,000 and $708,000, respectively.

Included in the pro forma combined results of operations are the following adjustments for Illume Mobile: (i) amortization of intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 of $125,000 and $214,000, respectively. Net loss per share assumes the 325,000 shares issued in connection with the Apex acquisition and the 617,284 shares issued in connection with the Illume Mobile acquisition are outstanding for each period presented, see “    Note 4 – Business Combinations   ” in the accompanying Notes to the Form 10-Q Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus for additional details.
The historical financial information of Apex has been extracted for the periods required from the historical financial statements of Apex Systems Integrators, Inc. which were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  The historical financial information of Illume Mobile has been derived from using internally generated management reports for the periods required.  Historical financial information from both Apex and Illume Mobile were combined with the operations of the Company for the corresponding periods for purposes of pro forma presentation.
The unaudited pro forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of the Company’s consolidated results of operations that would have been reported had the Apex and Illume Mobile acquisitions been completed as of the beginning of the period presented, nor should it be taken as indicative of the Company’s future consolidated results of operations.

Recent Business Developments

During the second quarter of 2013, we released a number of enhancements to our APEXWare Field Service software platform.  The first major enhancement was the introduction of support for the IOS operating system and Apple’s iPad tablet computer series.  Tablet computers and specifically the iPad are gaining acceptance with many field service providers and as such supporting this new technology and form factor extends the potential market for APEXWare Field Service.  The second major enhancement is the support of the Android operating system.  As field service organizations look for new and less expensive mobile computers, smart phones are increasing being selected by many Field Service organizations.  Additionally, the traditional rugged mobile computer manufacturers such as Intermec and Motorola are releasing new ruggedized mobile computers based on the Android operating system.  These devices are specifically suited for Field Service providers that require hardened devices or peripheral support such as barcode scanning.  All the APEXWareÔ Field Service business functions are available on the iPad and Android devices including:
• Work Order Management
• Parts Inventory Management
• Parts Ordering
• Asset Management
• Time and Labor Reporting
• Custom Forms Data Collection

Results of Operations
For comparison purposes, all dollar amounts have been rounded to nearest million while all percentages are actual.  Due to rounding, totals in the tables presented may not sum to the total presented in the table.

  Three Months Ended    Six Months Ended   
  June 30,  Increase  June 30, Increase 
  2013 2012  (Decrease)  2013 2012 (Decrease) 
                
Total revenue $14,721  $17,767   (17.1%) $28,493  $35,577   (19.9%)
Gross profit $3,566   3,719   (4.1%) $6,390   7,463   (14.4%)
Total operating expenses $4,464   4,802   (7.1%) $9,496   8,629   10.1%
Loss from operations $(898)  (1,083)  (17.1%) $(3,106)  (1,166)  166.5%
Loss before provision for income taxes $(1,146)  (1,258)  (8.9%) $(3,575)  (1,453)  146.1%
Total Revenue

Revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is summarized below:
  Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended    
  June 30,  Increase  June 30,  Increase 
  2013  2012  (Decrease)  2013  2012  (Decrease) 
                   
Hardware $8,524  $11,864   (28.1%) $16,854  $24,631   (31.6%)
Professional services  4,411   4,292   2.8%  8,344   7,900   5.6%
Software  1,461   1,047   39.5%  2,536   1,861   36.3%
Other  325   564   (42.5%)  759   1,185   (36.0%)
  $14,721  $17,767   (17.1%) $28,493  $35,577   (19.9%)

Revenues were $14.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $17.8 million for the same period ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $3.1 million or 17.1%.  The decrease in revenue was partially offset due to the inclusion of the operating results of our Apex and Illume Mobile acquisitions in mid-2012.  Revenues for Apex were $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $0.2 million for the same period ended June 30, 2012.  Revenues for Illume Mobile were $0.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2013.  Excluding the impact of Apex and Illume Mobile acquisitions in mid-2012, revenues decreased by $4.1 million, or 23.2% over the same quarter in the prior year with the largest decrease occurring in hardware sales where sales decreased by 28.1%.

Revenues were $28.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $35.6 million for the same period ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $7.1 million or 19.9%.  The decrease in revenue was partially offset due to the inclusion of the operating results of our Apex and Illume Mobile acquisitions in mid-2012.  Revenues for Apex were $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $0.2 million for the same period ended June 30, 2012.  Revenues for Illume Mobile were $0.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2013.  Excluding the impact of Apex and Illume Mobile acquisitions in mid-2012, revenues decreased by $8.8 million, or 24.8% over the same period in the prior year with the largest decrease occurring in hardware sales where sales decreased by 31.6%.

The improved economic conditions in the U.S. which had begun in the first half of 2010, and continued improvement throughout 2011 and 2012 had a positive effect on our sales in those years.  Prior to 2010, major retail chains had deferred new technology implementation and delayed systems’ refresh.  Conversely, the economic environment in 2012 stabilized whereupon we benefitted from renewed interest and more importantly, fundamental need to implement new cost saving technology.  In the first and second quarter of 2013, we did not have the same level of customers with new technology implementation and systems’ refresh.  As a result, the hardware revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 declined by 28.1% and 31.6%, respectively, which was due to the decrease in system upgrades of mobile computing at the retail level.  The slight increase in professional services for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 of 2.8% and 5.6%, respectively, relates to deployment and staging services to support our customers’ prior technology upgrades.  Our increase in software revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same periods in 2012 is attributable to contributions of software revenues from the Apex and Illume Mobile acquisitions.  The slight decrease in other revenues relates to a reallocation of our corporate resources away from the lower volume for consumables and towards the professional services business.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is summarized below:

  Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended    
  June 30,  Increase  June 30,  Increase 
  2013  2012  (Decrease)  2013  2012  (Decrease) 
                   
Hardware $6,851  $9,931   (31.0%) $13,613  $20,504   (33.6%)
Professional services  2,865   2,958   (3.2%)  5,658   5,411   4.6%
Software  1,206   795   51.7%  2,286   1,467   55.9%
Other  233   364   (35.9%)  546   732   (25.4%)
  $11,155  $14,048   (20.6%) $22,103  $28,114   (21.4%)

The types of expenses included in the cost of sales line are hardware costs, third party licenses, costs associated with third party professional services, salaries and benefits for project managers and software engineers, freight, consumables and accessories.
Cost of sales were $11.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $14.0 million for the same period ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $2.8 million or 20.0%.  The decrease in cost of sales for hardware of 31.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 was slightly higher than the hardware revenue decrease due to fewer large hardware orders which usually have reduced pricing.  The decrease in cost of sales for professional services from the three months ended June 30, 2013 to the three months ended June 30, 2012 was 3.2%, compared to the revenue growth rate of 2.8% and was due to a decrease in professional service personnel.  The increase in cost of sales for software of 51.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 was slightly higher due to the impact of software intangible asset amortization. The decrease in other cost of sales relates to the decrease in the other revenues.

Cost of sales were $22.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $28.1 million for the same period ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $6.0 million or 21.4%. The decrease in cost of sales for hardware of 33.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 was slightly higher that the hardware revenue decrease due to a fewer large orders which usually have reduced pricing. The increase in cost of sales for professional services from the six months ended June 30, 2013 to the six months ended June 30, 2012 was 4.6% compared to the revenue growth rate of 5.6%. The increase in cost of sales for software of 55.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 was slightly higher due to the impact of software intangible asset amortization. The decrease in other cost of sales relates to the decrease on other revenues.
Gross Profit

Our gross profit was $3.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $3.7 million for the same period ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $0.1 million or 4.1%.  Our gross margin percentage increased by 330 basis points to 24.2% in 2013, from 20.9% in the comparable period of 2012.

Our gross profit was $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $7.5 million for the same period ended June 30, 2012, a decrease of $1.1 million or 14.4%.  Our gross margin percentage increased by 140 basis points to 22.4% in 2013, from 21.0% in the comparable period of 2012.

The increase in gross margin percentage for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 is due to continued implementation of increased cost control for the products and services which we resell, and our professional service costs were positively impacted by our better utilization associated with greater recognized revenue from these services in the current three and six months and therefore, we realized higher margins on those services. Additionally, these increases are partially offset due to amortization of intangible software assets, offset by the lower volume of hardware sales which carry a lower gross margin, combined with a higher proportion of sales from professional services.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
  Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended    
  June 30,  Increase  June 30,  Increase 
  2013  2012  (Decrease)  2013  2012  (Decrease) 
                   
Selling, general and administrative expenses $4,464  $4,803   (7.1%) $9,496  $8,628   10.1%
As a percentage of sales  30.3%  27.0%  3.3%  33.3%  24.3%  9.1%

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $4.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $4.8 million for the same period in the prior year.  This represents a decrease of $0.3 million, or 7.1%. The decrease was primarily due to reduced Legal and other professional fees.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $9.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $8.6 million for the same period in the prior year.  This represents an increase of $0.9 million, or 10.1%. The increase was partially due to the addition of the Apex and Illume Mobile businesses which added $1.2 million compared to the same period in the prior year in selling, general and administrative costs to operate those businesses.  Additionally, there was an increase in sales salary related expenses of $0.9 million which, in part relates to the expansion of the sales force in the U.S. tasked with bringing the APEXWare™ product to the U.S. market.


  Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended    
  June 30,  Increase  June 30,  Increase 
  2013  2012  (Decrease)  2013  2012  (Decrease) 
Depreciation and amortization                  
In cost of sales $0.2  $0.1   246.2% $0.4  $0.1   500.4%
In operating expenses  0.3   0.2   48.1%  0.6   0.3   69.1%
Total depreciation and amortization $0.5  $0.3   93.4% $1.0  $0.4   139.6%
As a percentage of sales  3.4%  1.4%      3.5%  1.2%    

In addition to the differences above, selling, general and administrative costs were higher for the six months ended June 30, 2013 due to amortization of intangible assets as a result of the Apex and Illume acquisitions in 2012.

Interest Expense

Interest expense, which is related to our line of credit, subordinated debt, was $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $0.2 million for the same period in the prior year.

Interest expense, which is related to our line of credit, subordinated debt, was $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, compared to $0.3 million for the same period in the prior year.

The $0.2 million increase in interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the same period in the prior year was the result of increased general debt obligations and relating to the Apex acquisition.  On June 4, 2012 Apex entered in to the RBC Credit Agreement, borrowing CDN $2,500,000 at an interest rate of RBP plus 4%.  The RBC Credit Agreement also includes a revolving demand facility with an authorized limit of CDN $200,000 at an interest rate of RBP plus 1.5%.  On June 4, 2012 Apex also entered in to the BDC Loan Agreement, borrowing CDN $1,700,000 at the rate of 12% per annum.  Additionally, on February 27, 2013, we entered into an amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement with SVB which provided an additional term loan of $1 million at a rate of 7.5%.  Due to these additional borrowings, interest expense was higher during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.


For comparison purposes, all dollar amounts have been rounded to nearest million while all percentages are actual.

  Year ended December 31,       
  2012  2011  Increase/(Decrease) 
             
Total revenue $71.5  $58.4  $13.1   22.5%
Gross profit $15.6  $12.0  $3.6   29.7%
Total operating expenses $18.7  $13.6  $5.1   37.2%
Loss from operations $(3.1) $(1.6) $1.5   93.8%
Loss before provision for income taxes $(4.0) $(5.1) $(1.1)  -21.3%
                 
Total Revenue
Revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 is summarized below:

  Year ended December 31,  Increase 
  2012  2011  (Decrease) 
          
Hardware $48.5  $40.3   20.4%
Professional services  16.4   13.5   21.3%
Software  4.5   2.0   120.1%
Other  2.1   2.5   -16.6%
  $71.5  $58.4   22.5%
             
Revenues were $71.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $58.4 million for the same period ended December 31, 2011, an increase of $13.1 million or 22.5%. The increase in revenue was partially due to the inclusion of the operating results of our Apex acquisition from June 5, 2012 and Illume Mobile from August 1, 2012. Revenues for Apex were $1.1 million and revenues for Illume Mobile were $0.4 million. Excluding the impact of Apex and Illume Mobile acquisitions in 2012, revenues increased by $11.5 million, or 20.0% over the prior year with the largest increase occurring in hardware sales where sales increased by 18.9%.

The improved economic conditions in the U.S. which had begun in the first half of 2010, and continued improvement throughout 2011 and 2012 have had a positive effect on our sales. In prior years, major retail chains had deferred new technology implementation and delayed systems’ refresh. Conversely, the economic environment in 2012 stabilized whereupon we benefitted from renewed interest and more importantly, fundamental need to implement new cost saving technology. As a result, the 20.4% increase in hardware revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 was due to the increase in system upgrades of mobile computing at the retail level. The increase in professional services for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 of 21.3% relates to deployment and staging services to support our customer’s technology upgrades. Our increase in software revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 is attributable to the increased implementation activity as well as the contributions of software revenues from the Apex and Illume Mobile acquisitions. The decrease in other revenues relates to a reallocation of corporate resources away from the lower volume for consumables and towards the professional services business.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 is summarized below:
  Year ended December 31,  Increase 
  2012  2011  (Decrease) 
          
Hardware $40.2  $33.0   21.5%
Professional services  11.3   10.2   10.7%
Software  3.2   1.6   100.7%
Other  1.3   1.5   -15.3%
  $56.0  $46.4   20.7%
             
The types of expenses included in the cost of sales line are hardware costs, third party licenses, costs associated with third party professional services, salaries and benefits for project managers and software engineers, freight, consumables and accessories.

Cost of sales were $56.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $46.4 million for the same period ended December 31, 2011, an increase of $9.6 million or 20.7%. The increase in cost of sales for hardware of 21.5% for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 was slightly higher than the hardware revenue increase due to reduced pricing associated with larger technology purchases. The increase in cost of sales for professional services from the year ended December 31, 2011 to the year ended December 31, 2012 was 10.7%, much lower than the revenue growth rate of 21.3% and was due to better utilization of professional service personnel associated with the growth in revenues. The increase in cost of sales for software of 100.7% for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 was lower than the software revenue increase due to a change in product mix associated with the Apex and Illume Mobile acquisitions. The decrease in other cost of sales relates to the decrease in the other revenues in approximately the same percentage.

Gross Profit
Our gross profit was $15.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $12.0 million for the same period ended December 31, 2011, an increase of $3.6 million or 29.7%. Our gross margin percentage increased by 1.3% to 21.8% in 2012, from 20.5% in the comparable period of 2011. The increase in gross profit is directly due to the higher gross profit from professional services revenue. Additionally, we have continued to implement increased cost control for the products and services which we resell, our professional service costs were positively impacted by our better utilization associated with greater recognized revenue from these services in the current twelve months and therefore, we realized higher margins on those services.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

  Year ended December 31,       
  2012  2011  Increase/(Decrease) 
             
Selling, general and administrative expenses $18.7  $13.6  $5.1   37.2%
As a percentage of sales  26.1%  23.3%      2.8%
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $18.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $13.6 million for the same period in the prior year. This represents an increase of $5.1 million, or 37.2%.The increase was partially due to $2.2 million in costs to acquire the Apex and Illume Mobile businesses. Further, the addition of those businesses in 2012 added $1.7 million in selling, general and administrative expenses to operate those businesses. Additionally, the Company had severance expenses of $0.4 million in 2012 which it didn't have in 2011.

  Year ended December 31,       
  2012  2011  Increase/(Decrease) 
             
Depreciation and amortization $1.6  $0.6  $1.0   177.2%
                 
Finance and administration expenses were also higher due to amortization of intangible assets as a result of the Apex and Illume acquisitions in 2012.  Amortization expense of intangible assets for the years ended December 2012 and 2011, totaled $1.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

Interest Expense

Interest expense, which is related to our line of credit, subordinated debt and our obligations with related parties, was $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $1.2 million for the same period ended December 31, 2011.  The $0.2 million decrease in interest expense was the result of the exchange of our subordinated notes for preferred stock in June 2011, and lower amounts outstanding on our lines of credit and term loans in the first five months of 2012, prior to the issuance of term debt for the Apex financing.  On June 4, 2012 Apex entered in to the RBC Credit Agreement, borrowing CDN $2,500,000 at an interest rate of Royal Bank Prime (“RBP”) plus 4%.  The RBC Credit Agreement also includes a revolving demand facility with an authorized limit of CDN $200,000 at an interest rate of RBP plus 1.5%.  On June 4, 2012 Apex also entered in to the BDC Loan Agreement, borrowing CDN $1,700,000 at the rate of 12% per annum.  Due to these additional borrowings, interest expense was higher during the second half of 2012.

Other (Income) Expense

Other (income) expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, totaled $(116,000) and $(363,000), respectively. During 2011, we satisfied our receivable from Empresario for a net gain of $0.3 included as ‘other income’.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and Cash Flow

Although we have historically experienced losses, a material part of those losses were from non-cash transactions (refer to the accompanying Form 10-Q Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included elsewhere in this Prospectus.) In connection with these losses, we have accumulated substantial net operating loss carry-forwards to off-set future taxable income. In order to maintain normal operations for the foreseeable future, we must continue to have access to our line of credit, become profitable and/or access additional equity capital. There can be no assurance that we will become profitable or that we can continue to raise additional funds required to continue our normal operations. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that would be required should we not be successful with these activities.

Funds generated by operating activities and our credit facilities continue to be our most significant sources of liquidity.  For the six months ended June 30, 2013, our revenue decreased approximately 19.9%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012, partially due to the lower level of retail customers’ system refreshes and system implementations.  We also had an increased level of selling, general and administrative expenses in the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012 due to inclusion of the results from Apex and Illume Mobile along with increased selling expenses, professional expenses and investor relations expenses related to being a public company along with an increase in amortization expense of intangible assets, all resulted in higher operating loss for the first six months of 2013.

We believe that our strategic shift to higher margin field mobility solutions with additional APEXWare™ software and professional service revenues will improve our results as economic conditions continue to improve.

In the quarter ended June 30, 2013, we experienced a decrease in revenue of $3.0 million compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2012, and a $1.0 million increase in revenue compared to the previous sequential quarter ended March 31, 2013.  In the six months ended June 30, 2013, we incurred approximately $0.9 million in increased expenses due to professional fees relating to the capital raising activities, the registration of common shares as a result of the Series D Preferred Stock offering and associated audit fees, and other matters such as employee termination costs. We experienced a net loss of $1.3 million and $3.7 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, which were far in excess of the internal forecast maintained by the management team. In addition, we have a substantial working capital deficit totaling $(13.6) million at June 30, 2013.  Although a portion of this deficit is associated with deferred costs and unearned revenues and term debt that has been classified current due to expected future covenant violations (see further discussion at Note 7), our liabilities that are expected to be satisfied in the foreseeable future in cash far exceed the operating assets that are expected to be satisfied in cash. As a result, the availability under our credit line has contracted significantly and our overall liquidity has become significantly constrained.
To address these matters, we have embarked on a comprehensive review of our operations, which is expected to significantly reduce non-essential expenses and complete the integration of our acquisitions of Apex and Illume Mobile, which is expected to result in further cost savings.
As of August 15, 2013, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with accredited investors for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,756,400. Closings were held as of August 15, 2013 and August 21, 2013. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company sold an aggregate of 2,927,333 Units, each Unit consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase one-half of one share of common stock (the “Investor Warrants”), for a purchase price of $0.60 per Unit, such that the Company sold an aggregate of 2,927,333 shares of common stock (the “Common Shares”) and 1,463,667 Investor Warrants for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,756,400. The Investor Warrants have a five-year term and an exercise price of $1.00 per share.  We received net proceeds of approximately $1.4 million, after deducting the placement agent fees of 10% and other offering expenses.
During 2012 and 2013, all principal payments on our term debt were made within payment terms. We were not in compliance with certain financial covenants under the agreements with Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC Credit Agreement”) and BDC, Inc. (“BDC Credit Agreement”) as of December, 31, 2012, March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013.  We have received waivers for non-compliance for past covenant violations and are currently discussing resetting debt covenants with these institutions to avoid currently expected future violations.  Although we believe it is improbable that RBC and/or BDC will exercise their rights up to, and including, acceleration of the outstanding debt, there can be no assurance RBC and BDC will not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the debt obligations. Accordingly, we have classified these debt obligations as current at June 30, 2013 (see Note 7 – Term Debt in the accompanying Form 10-Q Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus).
At July 31, 2013, the outstanding balance on the line of credit with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) is $3.1 million, down from $4.2 million at April 30, 2013, and the availability under the line of credit has increased to $2.6 million (see Note 6 – Lines of Credit in the accompanying Form 10-Q Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus).  We rely on the line of credit to fund daily operating activities maintaining very little cash on hand.  As of December 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all of our financial covenants with SVB. As of May 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013, we were not in compliance with the Tangible Net Worth financial covenant as defined in the amended SVB Loan Agreement. SVB has agreed to temporarily forbear from exercising their rights and remedies under the facility until August 28, 2013 and has agreed to waive the existing covenant violations if a gross capital raise of $1.5 million is completed by such date. We completed the capital raise and were able to achieve compliance with the forbearance agreement prior to August 28, 2013. Accordingly, we believe that at the time of this filing we are in compliance with the terms and provisions of its SVB lending agreements.  Except for any capital raises through August 28, 2013, the minimum Tangible Net Worth requirement of a $(9.7) million deficit will be further reduced by one half of any funds raised through sales of common stock (as only 50% of additional capital raises are given credit in the Tangible Net Worth calculation).  We estimate that its minimum Tangible Net Worth at July 31, 2013, giving pro forma effect for the net $1.4 million in capital raise closed to date in August, was approximately a $(9.1) million deficit, leaving approximately $0.6 million in Tangible Net Worth cushion over the requirement of the line of credit. Should we continue to incur losses in a manner consistent with our recent historical financial performance, we will violate this covenant without additional net capital raises in amounts that are approximately twice the amount of the losses incurred.
In the near term, our successful restructuring of our operations and reduction of operating costs and/or its ability to raise additional capital at acceptable terms is critical to its ability to continue to operate for the foreseeable future.  If we continue to incur operating losses and/or does not raise sufficient additional capital, material adverse events may occur including, but not limited to, 1) a reduction in the nature and scope of the Company’s operations, 2) the Company’s inability to fully implement its current business plan and/or 3) continued defaults under the various loan agreements.  A covenant default would give the bank the right to demand immediate payment of all outstanding amounts which the Company would not be able to repay out of normal operations.  There are no assurances that the Company will successfully implement its plans with respect to these liquidity matters.  The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not reflect any adjustment that may be required resulting from the adverse outcome relating to this uncertainty.
As a matter of course, we do not maintain significant cash balances on hand since we are financed by a line of credit.  Typically, we use any excess cash to repay the then outstanding line of credit balance.  As long as we continue to generate revenues and meet our financial covenants, we are permitted to draw down on our line of credit to fund our normal working capital needs.  As of June 30, 2013, the outstanding balance on our SVB line of credit was approximately $2.6 million and the interest rate is 7.0%.  As of June 30, 2013, there was $2.9 million available under the line of credit.  As of July 31, 2013, the outstanding balance under the line of credit was $3.1 million and there was $2.6 million available under the line of credit.  On February 27, 2013, we obtained an additional $1.0 million term loan from SVB (see below under “2013 Financing” for terms of the line of credit and the term loan.)

In connection with our Preferred Series D Private Placement in December 2012, 25% of the net proceeds are to be restricted for the Apex payment of the contingent consideration and the additional bonus consideration (see below under “2012 Financing.”)  These funds have not been placed into escrow pending agreement between the Company and former owners of Apex regarding the financial institution that will escrow the funds, the amount of funds to be escrowed and the terms of the escrow agreement itself.
In the last four complete years of operations from 2009 through 2012, we have not experienced any significant effects of inflation on our product and service pricing, revenues or our income from continuing operations.

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had cash of approximately $0.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively.  We have used, and plan to use, such cash for general corporate purposes, including working capital.

As of June 30, 2013, we had negative working capital of $13.6 million and total stockholders’ deficit of ($2.5) million.  As of December 31, 2012, we had negative working capital of $9.1 million and total stockholders’ equity of $0.9 million.  At June 30, 2013, included in current liabilities is unearned revenue of $7.3 million, which reflects services that are to be performed in future periods but that have been paid and/or accrued for and therefore, would not represent additional future cash outflows.  At June 30, 2013, included in current assets are deferred costs of $4.0 million which reflect costs paid for third party extended maintenance services that are being amortized over their respective service periods, which do not generally represent future cash inflows.  The increase in the unearned revenue, offset by the deferred costs, continues to provide a benefit in future periods as the amounts convert to net realized revenue.

2013 Financing and Common Stock Private Placement

Silicon Valley Bank Financing

On February 27, 2013, we and Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”), entered into an Amendment (the “Amendment”) to Loan and Security Agreement, which amended the terms of the Loan and Security Agreement dated as of December 15, 2006 (as amended, the “Loan Agreement”). Pursuant to the Amendment, SVB made a new term loan to us on February 27, 2013, of $1,000,000 (“Term Loan II”). Repayment of Term Loan II, together with accrued interest thereon, is due in 36 monthly installments commencing on the first day of the month following the month in which the funding date of Term Loan II occurred.

Pursuant to the Amendment, the Loan Agreement was amended to provide that the revolving credit line thereunder will accrue interest at an annual rate equal to 3.75 percentage points above the Prime Rate, which may be further reduced to 3.25 percentage points above the Prime Rate after we achieve two consecutive fiscal quarters (beginning with any fiscal quarter ending on or after March 31, 2013) of profitability. In addition, the maturity date of the revolving credit line under the Loan Agreement was extended to February 28, 2015, the principal amount outstanding under the Term Loan under the Loan Agreement will accrue interest at a fixed annual rate equal to 9.0%, the principal amount outstanding under the Term Loan II will accrue interest at a fixed annual rate equal to 7.5%, and we agreed to pay an anniversary fee of $100,000 on February 28, 2014.
The Loan Agreement includes customary covenants, limitations and events of default. Financial covenants which may materially impact our liquidity include minimum liquidity and fixed charge coverage ratios (1.5 to 1), minimum tangible net worth requirements ($9.7 million) and limitations on indebtedness. Additionally, the Loan Agreement has customary cross-default covenants which will cause us to be in default if we are in default in other loan agreements.  As of December 31, 2012, we were in compliance with all of our financial covenants with SVB. As of May 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013, we were not on compliance with the Tangible Net Worth financial covenant as defined in the amended SVB Loan Agreement.
On August 16, 2013, we entered into an agreement with SVB (“Forbearance Agreement”) pursuant to which SVB agreed to temporarily forbear from exercising their rights and remedies under the facility until August 28, 2013 and agreed to waive the existing covenant violations if a gross capital raise of $1.5 million is completed by such date.  We completed the capital raise and were able to achieve compliance with the Forbearance Agreement prior to August 28, 2013. Accordingly, we believe that at the time of this filing we are in compliance with the terms and provisions of the SVB lending agreements.  Except for any capital raises through August 28, 2013, the minimum Tangible Net Worth requirement of a $(9.7) million deficit will be further reduced by one half of any funds raised through sales of common stock (as only 50% of additional capital raises are given credit in the Tangible Net Worth calculation).  We estimate that its minimum Tangible Net Worth at July 31, 2013, giving pro forma effect for the net $1.3 million in capital raise closed to date in August, was approximately a $(9.1) million deficit, leaving approximately $0.6 million in Tangible Net Worth cushion over the requirement of the line of credit. Should we continue to incur losses in a manner consistent with its recent historical financial performance, we will violate this covenant without additional net capital raises in amounts that are approximately twice the amount of the losses incurred.
Common Stock Private Placement
As noted above, as of August 15, 2013, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with accredited investors (the “Investors”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,756,400. Closings were held as of August 15, 2013 and August 21, 2013. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company sold an aggregate of 2,927,333 Units, each Unit consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase one-half of one share of common stock (the “Investor Warrants”), for a purchase price of $0.60 per Unit, such that the Company sold an aggregate of 2,927,333 shares of common stock (the “Common Shares”) and 1,463,667 Investor Warrants for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,756,400 (the “Private Placement”). The Investor Warrants have a five-year term and an exercise price of $1.00 per share

The Company retained Newport Coast Securities, Inc. (the “Placement Agent”) as the placement agent for the Private Placement. The Company paid the Placement Agent $175,640 in commissions (equal to 10% of the gross proceeds), and issued to the Placement Agent and its designees five-year warrants (the “Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase 292,733 shares of common stock (equal to 10% of the number of Units sold in the Private Placement) at an exercise price of $0.60 per share, exercisable on a cashless basis, in connection with the Private Placement. We expect that the warrants  will receive liability accounting treatment under existing technical standards.
The Company’s Series D Preferred Stock entitles the holder certain anti-dilution rights upon subsequent issuances of common stock which is less than the $1.00 per share conversion price of the Series D Preferred Stock.  The conversion price of the Series D Preferred Stock will be further reduced by any additional equity issuances which are lower than the conversion price in effect at the time of issuance.  As a result of the Purchase Agreement discussed above, the exercise price of the Series D Preferred Stock was reduced from $1.00 per share to $0.90 per share.  If all Series D Preferred Stock is converted an additional 782,444 shares of common stock will be issued further diluting existing common stockholders and holders of Series D Preferred warrants and Investor Warrants.
2012 Financing and Preferred Series D Private Placement

Royal Bank of Canada and BDC Capital, Inc. Financing

On June 4, 2012, Apex entered into a Credit Agreement (“RBC Credit Agreement”) with Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”), pursuant to which RBC made available certain credit facilities in the aggregate amount of up to CDN$2,750,000 (US$2,641,000 at the Closing Date), including a revolving demand facility with an authorized limit of CDN$200,000 (US$192,000 at the Closing Date).  The RBC Term Loan accrues interest at RBP plus 4% (7% at December 31, 2012). Principal and interest is payable over a three year period at a fixed principal amount of CDN$69,444 a month beginning in July 2012 and continuing through June 2015. Apex paid approximately $120,000 in financing costs, which has been recorded as deferred financing costs and is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the loan.

In addition, the RBC Term Loan calls for mandatory repayments based on 20% of Apex’s free cash flow as defined in the RBC Credit Agreement, before discretionary bonuses based on the annual year end audited financial statements of Apex, beginning with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, and payable within 30 days of the delivery of the annual audited financial statements, and continuing every six months through December 31, 2014. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company estimates that the mandatory repayment based on 20% of Apex’s free cash flow will be $0.
The RBC Term Loan has certain financial covenants and other non-financial covenants.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Apex was not in compliance with the Fixed Charge Coverage ratio (as defined by the RBC Credit Agreement).  The Fixed Charge Coverage ratio of not less than 1.25:1 is calculated as the ratio of the trailing twelve months of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) to loan payments and interest charges for the RBC Credit Agreement and the BDC Term Loan.  Our calculation of the Fixed Charge Coverage ratio at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is 0.58:1 and 0.86:1, respectively.  Additionally, at June 30, 2013 we were not in compliance with the Maximum Funded Debt to EBITDA ratio.  In order to be in compliance with this covenant, we need a ratio of not less than 2.25:1.  At June 30, 2013 our maximum funded debt to EBITDA ratio was 2.29:1.  Under the RBC Credit Agreement, violation of this covenant is an Event of Default which grants RBC the right to demand immediate payment of outstanding balances.  In March 2013, May 2013 and August 2013, we received waivers for non-compliance of these covenants at December 31, 2012, March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013.  The covenants were reset by RBC on August 16, 2013.  We do not believe that we will be in compliance with the reset covenants at December 31, 2013. We are currently further discussing adjusting the reset debt covenants with RBC.  Although we believe it is improbable RBC will exercise their rights up to, and including, acceleration of the outstanding debt, there can be no assurance that RBC will not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the debt obligation.  Accordingly, we have classified the term debt obligation as current at June 30, 2013.
On June 4, 2012, Apex also entered into the BDC Loan Agreement with BDC Capital Inc. (“BDC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Business Development Bank of Canada, pursuant to which BDC made available to Apex a term credit facility (“BDC Credit Facility”) in the aggregate amount of CDN $1,700,000 (USD $1,632,340 at the Closing Date). The BDC Term Loan accrues interest at the rate of 12% per annum, and matures on June 23, 2016, with an available one year extension for a fee of 2%, payable at the time of extension. In addition to the interest payable, consecutive quarterly payments of CDN$20,000 as additional interest are due beginning on June 23, 2012, and subject to compliance with bank covenants, Apex will make a mandatory annual principal payment in the form of a cash flow sweep which will be equal to 50% of the Excess Available Funds (as defined by the BDC Loan Agreement) before discretionary bonuses based on the annual year end audited financial statements of Apex. The maximum annual cash flow sweep in any year will be CDN$425,000. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company estimated the cash sweep will be approximately $0.  Such payments will be applied to reduce the outstanding principal payment due on the maturity date. In the event that Apex’s annual audited financial statements are not received within 120 days of its fiscal year end, the full CDN$425,000 becomes due and payable on the next payment date. Apex paid approximately $70,000 in financing costs which has been recorded as deferred financing costs and is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the loan.
The BDC Loan Agreement contains certain financial and non-financial covenants which may materially impact our liquidity, including minimum working capital requirements, tangible net worth requirements and limitations on additional indebtedness.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Apex was not in compliance with the minimum working capital financial covenant.  In order to be in compliance with the minimum working capital requirement at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we would have needed an additional $0.7 and $0.5 million in working capital, respectively.  Under the BDC Loan Agreement, violation of this covenant is an Event of Default which grants BDC the right to demand immediate payment of outstanding balances.  In March 2013 and May 2013, we received waivers for non-compliance of these covenants at December 31, 2012, March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013.  We are currently discussing resetting debt covenants with BDC.  Although we believe it is improbable that BDC will exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the debt obligation up to, and including, acceleration of the outstanding debt, there can be no assurance that BDC will not exercise their rights. Accordingly, we have classified the debt obligation as current at June 30, 2013.

In connection with the BDC Loan Agreement, BDC executed a subordination agreement in favor of Silicon Valley Bank, pursuant to which BDC agreed to subordinate any security interest in assets of the Company granted in connection with the BDC Loan Agreement to Silicon Valley Bank’s existing security interest in assets of the Company.  The subordination agreement contains cross-default provisions which may materially impact our liquidity.

In the event either or both of the RBC Loan Agreement or the BDC Loan Agreement were deemed to be in default, RBC or BDC, as applicable, could, among other things (subject to the rights of SVB as the Company’s senior lender), terminate the facilities, demand immediate repayment of any outstanding amounts, and foreclose on our assets. Any such action would require us to curtail or cease operations. The Company does not have alternative sources of financing.

Preferred Series D Private Placement

On December 20, 2012, we entered into and closed a securities purchase agreement (the “Series D Purchase Agreement”) with accredited investors, pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 633,600 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series D Preferred Shares”) for a purchase price of $10.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $6,336,000 (the “Series D First Closing”).

We retained Taglich Brothers, Inc. (the “Series D Placement Agent”) as the placement agent for the Series D First Closing. We paid the Series D Placement Agent $506,880 in commissions (equal to 8% of the gross proceeds), and issued to the Series D Placement Agent five-year warrants (the “Series D Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase 633,600 shares of our common stock (equal to 10% of the number of shares of common stock underlying the Series D Preferred Shares sold under the Purchase Agreement) at an exercise price of $1.10 per share, in connection with the Series D First Closing. The investors included certain of our officers, directors and employees, who purchased an aggregate of 20,700 Series D Preferred Shares.  We used $4.7 million of the proceeds from the Series D Closing to redeem all of our outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock.

On December 31, 2012, we sold an additional 70,600 shares of Series D Preferred Stock for a purchase price of $10.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $706,000 (the “Series D Second Closing”, and together with the Series D First Closing, the “Series D Closings”) pursuant to the Series D Purchase Agreement for an aggregate of 704,200 shares of Series D Preferred Stock sold.  The Series D Placement Agent acted as the placement agent for the Series D Second Closing as well. We paid the Series D Placement Agent $56,480 in commissions (equal to 8% of the gross proceeds), and issued to the Series D Placement Agent Series  D Placement Agent Warrants to purchase 70,600 shares of common stock (equal to 10% of the number of shares of common stock underlying the Series D Preferred Shares sold under the Series D Purchase Agreement) at an exercise price of $1.10 per share, in connection with the Series D Second Closing for an aggregate of 704,200 such Placement Agent Warrants.  The investors included one of our officers who purchased an aggregate of 2,500 Series D Preferred Shares.
Our proceeds from the Series D Closings, before deducting placement agent fees and other expenses, were approximately $7.0 million. We used $4.7 million for redemption of all of our outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock. Approximately $1.0 million was used to pay fees and expenses of the offering, and $1.3 million are funds are available for general corporate purposes. Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, we are required to place 25% of net offering proceeds, as defined, in an escrow account to satisfy our payment obligations of certain earn-out provisions. These funds have not been placed into escrow pending agreement between the Company and the sellers under the stock purchase agreement regarding the financial institution that will escrow the funds, the amount of funds that are to be placed in escrow and the escrow agreement itself.
In connection with the Series D First Closing, on December 20, 2012, we filed a Certificate of Designation of Series D Preferred Stock (the “Series D Certificate of Designation”) with the Secretary of State of Delaware. Pursuant to the Series D Certificate of Designation, we designated 4,000,000 shares of our preferred stock as Series D Preferred Stock. The Series D Preferred Stock has a Stated Value of $10.00 per share, votes on an as-converted basis with the common stock, and is convertible, at the option of the holder, into such number of shares of our common stock equal to the number of shares of Series D Preferred Stock to be converted, multiplied by the Stated Value, divided by the Conversion Price in effect at the time of the conversion.  The initial Conversion Price was $1.00, subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar transactions, and in the event of subsequent equity sales at a lower price per share, subject to certain exceptions. As a result of the Private Placement completed in August 2013, the Conversion Price of the Series D Preferred Stock was reduced to $0.90. The Series D Preferred Stock entitles the holder to cumulative dividends, payable quarterly, at an annual rate of (i) 8% of the Stated Value during the three year period commencing on the date of issue, and (ii) 12% of the Stated Value commencing three years after the date of issue. We may, at our option, pay dividends in PIK Shares, in which event the applicable dividend rate will be 12% and the number of such PIK Shares issuable will be equal to the aggregate dividend payable divided by the lesser of (x) the then effective Conversion Price or (y) the average volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the five prior consecutive trading days.

Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of our Company, holders of Series D Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive, for each share of Series D Preferred Stock, an amount equal to the Stated Value of $10.00 per share plus any accrued but unpaid dividends thereon before any distribution or payment may be made to the holders of any common stock, Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, or subsequently issued preferred stock.

In addition, commencing on the trading day on which the closing price of the common stock is greater than $2.00 for thirty consecutive trading days with a minimum average daily trading volume of at least 5,000 shares for such period, and at any time thereafter, we may, in our sole discretion, effect the conversion of all of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock to common stock (subject to the condition that, all of the shares issuable upon such conversion may be re-sold without limitation under an effective registration statement or pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act).

The Series D Preferred Stock also contains registration rights which compel the Company to file a registration statement with the SEC within 60 days of the final closing date (December 31, 2012), and requires the registration statement to become effective within 90 days thereafter.  The initial registration statement was filed on February 12, 2013.  If the registration statement is not declared effective by May 12, 2013, a partial liquidated damage equal to 0.1% of the purchase price paid by each investor shall be payable on each monthly anniversary until the registration statement becomes effective.  In no event shall the partial liquidated damage exceed 0.6% of the purchase price paid by each investor. As of June 30, 2013, the Company accrued partial liquidated damages of $11,000, total liquidates damages were $18,000.  On July 30, 2013, the registration statement was declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Cash Flows from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities

Information about our cash flows, by category, is presented in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The following table summarizes our cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (in millions):

  Six Months Ended       
  June 30,       
  2013  2012  Increase/(Decrease) 
             
Operating activities $0.2  $1.6  $(1.4)  87.5%
Investing activities  (0.0)  (4.8)  (4.8)  (99.8%)
Financing activities  (1.0)  3.4   (4.4)  (129.4%)

Cash provided by operating activities during the first six months of 2013 decreased by $1.5 million over the prior year.  The decrease in cash from operations was primarily driven by increase in net loss in the first six months of 2013 of $1.7 million.  Additionally, the changes in net working capital and other balance sheet changes contributed to a $0.6 million decrease in cash used in operating activities, offset from a $0.9 million increase in accounts receivable due to timing of receivable collections.
During the six months ended June 30, 2013, net cash provided by operating activities was $200,000.  Our net loss was $3.2 million in the first six months of 2013, a portion of which was the result of non-cash transactions during the year.  Specifically, we had a $1.0 million of other non-cash transactions including, but not limited to depreciation and amortization, employee stock-based compensation and ESOP compensation expense.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, net cash provided by operating activities was $1.6 million.  Our net loss was $1.5 million during the first six months of 2012, most of which was the result of non-cash transactions during the quarter.  Specifically, we had a $0.8 million non-cash expense such as depreciation and amortization, employee and non-employee stock-based compensation, and deferred taxes.
Net cash used in investing activities was negligible during the six months ended June 30, 2013. Net cash used in investing activities was $4.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and primarily related to the cash payment for the acquisition of Apex System Integrators, Inc. in June 2012.
During the six months ended June 30, 2013, net cash used in financing activities was $1.0 million, primarily due to $1.0 million in proceeds from the bank term loan, net of $1.0 million in payments for term loans and a net $0.7 million in net payments under our lines of credit.
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, net cash provided by financing activities was $3.4 million, primarily due to the $4.0 million from the issuance of term loan, $1.1 million in net repayments on the line of credit, $0.5 million in debt repayments, payment of $0.3 million for the Series C Preferred Stock dividend, $0.3 million of financing costs and $1.5 million received in reverse recapitalization.

Information about our cash flows, by category, is presented in the accompanying Form 10-K Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows included elsewhere in this Prospectus. The following table summarizes our cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in millions):

  Year ended December 31,       
  2012  2011  Increase/(Decrease) 
             
Operating activities $1.7  $(2.4) $4.1   170.8%
Investing activities  (5.1)  (1.7)  3.4   200.0%
Financing activities  4.1   4.2   (0.1)  -2.4%
Cash provided by operating activities for 2012 increased by $4.1 million over the prior year.  The increase in cash from operations was primarily driven by the changes in net working capital and other balance sheet changes, most notably from $1.6 million decrease in accounts receivable due to timing of receivable collections.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, net cash provided by operating activities was $1.7 million. Our net loss was $3.9 million in 2012, a portion of which was the result of non-cash transactions during the year. Specifically, we had a $0.7 million non-cash expense related to employee and non-employee stock based compensation and $1.5 million of other non-cash transactions such as depreciation and amortization.  Additionally, our cash position was positively affected by the net change in our unearned revenue of $0.1 million associated with increased deferred revenues and associated costs.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, net cash used in operating activities was $2.4 million. Our net loss was $5.2 million in 2011, most of which was the result of non-cash transactions during the year. Specifically, we had a $2.3 million non-cash loss on debt extinguishment as it related to the exchange of the $4.0 million subordinated debt for preferred stock and $1.3 million of other non-cash transactions such as depreciation and amortization, employee and non-employee stock-based compensation, and deferred taxes.  Additionally, our cash position was positively affected by the net change in our unearned revenue of $1.4 million associated with increased deferred revenues and associated costs.
Net cash used in investing activities was $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, and was primarily related to the combined cash payment for the acquisition of Apex Systems Integrators, Inc. and Illume Mobile in June and July 2012, respectively, of $5.0 million along with $0.1 million for purchases or property and equipment.
Net cash used in investing activities was $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, and was related to the cash payment to the shareholders of CMAC in January 2011 of $2.2 million offset by the $0.5 million collection of a note receivable in connection with the Merger in September 2011.
During the year ended December 31, 2012, net cash provided by financing activities was $4.1 million, primarily due to $4.0 million due to the issuance of term loans, $6.0 million related to the issuance of Series D Preferred (net of expenses), and $1.5 million in cash received in our reverse recapitalization (net of expenses). Cash used in financing activities was a result of $4.5 million in Series C Preferred Stock retirement, $0.6 million of net repayments on the line of credit, $1.4 million of senior long-term debt repayment, $0.6 million for the Series C Preferred Stock dividends and $0.3 million in financing costs.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, net cash provided by financing activities was $4.2 million, primarily due to the $4.0 million in proceeds from sale of subordinated debt and the $2.0 million of cash received from the Merger. Cash used in financing activities was the result of $1.0 million of senior long-term debt repayment, $0.3 million of net repayments on the line of credit, $0.2 million for the purchase of treasury stock, payment of $0.1 million for the Series C Preferred Stock dividend and $0.1 million of financing costs.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.  Critical accounting policies are those that require the application of management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often because of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and that may change in subsequent periods.  In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has utilized available information, including our past history, industry standards and the current economic environment, among other factors, in forming its estimates and judgments, giving due consideration to materiality.  Actual results may differ from these estimates.  In addition, other companies may utilize different estimates, which may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.  We believe that the following critical accounting policies involve a high degree of judgment and estimation:

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We have policies and procedures for reviewing and granting credit to all customer accounts, including:
·Credit reviews of all new customer accounts,
·Ongoing credit evaluations of current customers,
·Credit limits and payment terms based on available credit information,
·Adjustments to credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, and
·An active collection effort by regional credit functions, reporting directly to the corporate financial officers.

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. These allowances are highly judgmental and require assumptions based on both recent trends of certain customers estimated to be a greater credit risk, as well as historical trends of the entire customer pool.  If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.  To mitigate this credit risk we perform periodic credit evaluations of our customers.

Inventory
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market.  Cost is determined under the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.  We periodically review our inventory and make provisions as necessary for estimated obsolete and slow-moving goods.  We mark down inventory by an amount equal to the difference between cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demands, selling prices and market conditions.  The creation of such provisions results in a write-down of inventory to net realizable value and a charge to cost of sales.
Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets  

Goodwill represents the excess purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets of acquired companies.  Goodwill is subject to impairment testing as necessary, (at least once annually at December 31) if changes in circumstances or the occurrence of certain events indicate potential impairment.  In assessing the recoverability of our goodwill, identified intangibles, and other long-lived assets, significant assumptions regarding the estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets must be made, as well as the related estimated useful lives.  The fair value of goodwill and long-lived assets is estimated using a discounted cash flow valuation model and observed earnings and revenue trading multiples of identified peer companies.  If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future as a result of changes in strategy or market conditions, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets in the period such determination was made.
Intangible Assets
We make judgments about the recoverability of purchased finite-lived intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may exist.  Recoverability of finite-lived intangible assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the future undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to generate.  If it is determined that an individual asset is impaired, the amount of any impairment is measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the impaired asset.
The assumptions and estimates used to determine future values and remaining useful lives of our intangible are complex and subjective.  They can be affected by various factors, including external factors such as industry and economic trends, and internal factors such as changes in our business strategy and our forecasts.
Comprehensive Loss
Comprehensive loss consists of net loss and accumulated other comprehensive loss, which includes certain changes in equity that are excluded from net income.  Comprehensive loss for the six months ended June 30, 2013 is equal to the net loss plus other comprehensive loss totaling $22,000 (relating to exchange translation adjustments arising from the consolidation of our Canadian Apex subsidiary).  Comprehensive loss for the comparable six months ended 2012 is $5,000.
Income Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance, which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities, be recognized using enacted tax rates to measure the effect of temporary differences between book and tax bases on recorded assets and liabilities. FASB guidance also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance, if it is more likely than not some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be recognized.

We evaluate on an annual basis its ability to realize deferred tax assets by assessing its valuation allowance and by adjusting the amount of such allowance, if necessary. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization are forecasts of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets.

In accordance with FASB guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, we evaluate tax positions to determine whether the benefits of tax positions are more likely than not of being sustained upon audit based on the technical merits of the tax position. For tax positions that are more likely than not of being sustained upon audit, we recognize the largest amount of the benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. For tax positions that are not more likely than not of being sustained upon audit, we do not recognize any portion of the benefit. If the more likely than not threshold is not met in the period for which a tax position is taken, we may subsequently recognize the benefit of that tax position if the tax matter is effectively settled, the statute of limitations expires, or if the more likely than not threshold is met in a subsequent period.
Translation of Foreign Currencies

The Company's functional currency is the U.S. dollar. The financial statements of the Company's foreign subsidiary is measured using the local currency, in this case the Canadian dollar (CDN$), as its functional currency and is translated to U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. Assets and liabilities of the subsidiary are translated at exchange rates as of the balance sheet dates. Revenues and expenses of the subsidiary are translated at the rates of exchange in effect during the year.
Revenue recognition

Revenues are generated through product sales, warranty and maintenance agreements, software customization, and professional services.  Product sales are recognized when the following criteria are met (1) there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred and title has passed to the customer, which generally happens at the point of shipment provided that no significant obligations remain; (3) the price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.  We generate revenues from the sale of extended warranties on wireless and mobile hardware and systems.  Revenue related to extended warranty and service contracts is recorded as unearned revenue and is recognized over the life of the contract and we may be liable to refund a customer for amounts paid in certain circumstances.  This has not been an issue for us historically.

We also generate revenue from software customization and professional services on either a fee-for-service or fixed fee basis.  Revenue from software customization and professional services that is contracted as fee-for-service, also referred to as per-diem billing, is recognized in the period in which the services are performed or delivered.  Adjustments to contract price and estimated labor costs are made periodically, and losses expected to be incurred on contracts in progress are charged to operations in the period such losses are determined.

We enter into revenue arrangements that contain multiple deliverables.  Judgment is required to properly identify the accounting units of the multiple deliverable transactions and to determine the manner in which revenue should be allocated among the accounting units. Moreover, judgment is used in interpreting the commercial terms and determining when all criteria of revenue recognition have been met for each deliverable in order for revenue recognition to occur in the appropriate accounting period. While changes in the allocation of the arrangement consideration between the units of accounting will not affect the amount of total revenue recognized for a particular sales arrangement, any material changes in these allocations could impact the timing of revenue recognition, which could affect the Company’s results of operations. When we enter into an arrangement that includes multiple elements, the allocation of value to each element is derived based on management’s best estimate of selling price when vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence is unavailable.

Revenue from software licenses is recognized when all of the software revenue recognition criteria are met and, if applicable, when vendor specific objective evidence, or VSOE, exists to allocate the total license fee to each element of multiple-element software arrangements, including post-contract customer support. Post-contract support is recognized ratably over the support period. When a contract contains multiple elements wherein the only undelivered element is post-contract customer support and VSOE of the fair value of post-contract customer support does not exist, revenue from the entire arrangement is recognized ratably over the support period. Software royalty revenue is recognized in arrears on a quarterly basis, based upon reports received from licensees during the period, unless collectability is not reasonably assured, in which case revenue is recognized when payment is received from the licensee.

Stock-based compensation

We record the fair value of stock-based payments as an expense in our consolidated financial statements.  We determine the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.  This valuation model requires us to make assumptions and judgments about the variables used in the calculation.  These variables and assumptions include the weighted-average period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding, the volatility of our common stock, the risk-free interest rate and the estimated rate of forfeitures of unvested stock options.  Additional information on the variables and assumptions used in our stock-based compensation are described in Note 10 of the accompanying notes to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There were no off-balance sheet arrangements as of June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

New Accounting Standards
In July 2012, the FASB has issued ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles--Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment.     This ASU states that an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with Codification Subtopic 350-30,     Intangibles--Goodwill and Other, General Intangibles Other than Goodwill.

Under the guidance in this ASU, an entity also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing the quantitative impairment test. An entity will be able to resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period.

The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. We do not believe that the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In October 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-04, "Technical Corrections and Improvements."  ASU 2012-04 contains amendments to clarify the ASC, correct unintended application of guidance, or make minor improvements to the ASC that are not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice or create a significant administrative cost to most entities. Additionally, the amendments are intended to make the ASC easier to understand and the fair value measurement guidance easier to apply by eliminating inconsistencies and providing needed clarifications. The amendments that do not have transition guidance were effective upon issuance. The amendments that are subject to the transition guidance will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 will not have a material impact on our results of operations or our financial position.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income."     ASU 2013-02 requires an entity to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For other amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures that provide additional detail about those amounts.  The amendments do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. For public entities, the amendments are effective prospectively for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012.  Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 will not have a material impact on our results of operations or our financial position.

Remediation of Weaknesses in Internal Controls

Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2012 reported that such controls and procedures were ineffective as a result of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to the supervision and review of our financial closing and reporting process and in our ability to account for complex transactions as described in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and September 30, 2012. The complex transactions related to purchase accounting for acquisitions made in 2012.  During the fourth quarter of 2012, we devoted significant time and resources to the remediation of the material weakness that included, but was not limited to:
evaluating of Finance Department’s management and staff qualifications, which resulted in us making certain personnel changes in the Accounting and Finance department.
Implementation of further process and control procedures surrounding review of significant transactions within the financial closing process.
Implementing new control procedures over the utilization of external resources within the financial reporting process .

Although further and ongoing efforts will continue in 2013 and beyond to enhance our internal control over financial reporting, we believe that our remediation efforts now provide the foundation for compliance.

History

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., formerly known as Comamtech, Inc. (the "Company”, “DecisionPoint”, “we”, “our” or “us”), was incorporated on August 16, 2010, in Canada under the laws of the Ontario Business Corporations Act (“OCBA”). On June 15, 2011, we entered into a Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) among the Company, its wholly owned subsidiary, 2259736 Ontario Inc., incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada (the “Purchaser”) and DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. (“Old DecisionPoint”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, under Section 182 of the OCBA, on June 15, 2011 (the “Effective Date”) Old DecisionPoint merged (the “Merger”) into the Purchaser and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Prior to the Merger, Comamtech was a “shell company” (as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). In connection with the Merger, the Company changed its name to DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., and the Purchaser changed its name to DecisionPoint Systems International, Inc. (“DecisionPoint Systems International”). On June 15, 2011, both companies were reincorporated in the State of Delaware. 
DecisionPoint has two wholly owned subsidiaries, DecisionPoint Systems International and Apex Systems Integrators Inc. DecisionPoint Systems International has two wholly owned subsidiaries, DecisionPoint Systems Group Inc. (“DPS Group”) and CMAC, Inc. (“CMAC”). DecisionPoint Systems International acquired CMAC on December 31, 2010. CMAC was founded and incorporated in March 1996, and is a logistics consulting and systems integration provider focused on delivering operational and technical supply chain solutions, headquartered in Alpharetta, Georgia.

DPS Group has two wholly owned subsidiaries, DecisionPoint Systems CA, Inc. and DecisionPoint Systems CT, Inc. DecisionPoint Systems CA, Inc., formerly known as Creative Concepts Software, Inc. (“CCS”) was founded in 1995 and is a provider of Enterprise Mobility Solutions. Enterprise Mobility Solutions are those computer systems that give an enterprise the ability to connect to people, control assets, and transact business from any location by using mobile computers, tablet computers, and smartphones to securely connect the mobile worker to the back office software systems that run the enterprise. Technologies that support Enterprise Mobility Solutions include national wireless carrier networks, Wi-Fi, local area networks, mobile computers, smartphones and tablets, mobile software applications, middleware and device security and management software.  DecisionPoint Systems CT, Inc. formerly known as Sentinel Business Systems, Inc. (“SBS”) was founded in 1976 and has developed over time a family of powerful enterprise data collection software solutions, products and services. The combined company is a data collection systems integrator that sells and installs mobile devices, software, and related bar coding equipment, radio frequency identification (“RFID”) systems technology and provides custom solutions and other professional services.

Following the Merger, the business conducted by us is now the business conducted by Old DecisionPoint prior to the Merger.

Recent Developments
Preferred Series D Private Placement

On December 20, 2012, we entered into and closed a securities purchase agreement (the “Series D Purchase Agreement”) with accredited investors (the “Investors”), pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 633,600 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series D Preferred Shares”) for a purchase price of $10.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $6,336,000 (the “Series D First Closing”).

We retained Taglich Brothers, Inc. (the “Placement Agent”) as the placement agent for the Series D First Closing.We paid the Placement Agent $506,880 in commissions (equal to 8% of the gross proceeds), and issued to the Placement Agent five-year warrants (the “Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase 633,600 shares of our common stock (equal to 10% of the number of shares of common stock underlying the Series D Preferred Shares sold under the Purchase Agreement) at an exercise price of $1.10 per share, in connection with the Series D First Closing. The Investors included certain of our officers, directors and employees, who purchased an aggregate of 20,700 Series D Preferred Shares. We used $4.7 million of the proceeds from the Series D Closing to redeem all of our outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock.

On December 31, 2012, we sold an additional 70,600 shares of Series D Preferred Stock for a purchase price of $10.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $706,000 (the “Series D Second Closing”, and together with the Series D First Closing, the “Series D Closings”) pursuant to the Series D Purchase Agreement for an aggregate of 704,200 shares of Series D Preferred Stock sold. The Placement Agent acted as the placement agent for the Series D Second Closing as well. We paid the Placement Agent $56,480 in commissions (equal to 8% of the gross proceeds), and issued to the Placement Agent Placement Agent Warrants to purchase 70,600 shares of common stock (equal to 10% of the number of shares of common stock underlying the Series D Preferred Shares sold under the Series D Purchase Agreement) at an exercise price of $1.10 per share, in connection with the Series D Second Closing for an aggregate of 704,200 such Placement Agent Warrants. The Investors included one of our officers who purchased an aggregate of 2,500 Series D Preferred Shares.

Our proceeds from the Series D Closings, before deducting placement agent fees and other expenses, were approximately $7.0 million. We used $4.7 million for redemption of all of our outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock. Approximately $1.0 million was used to pay fees and expenses of this offering, and $1.3 million are funds available for general corporate purposes. Pursuant to the Apex Stock Purchase Agreement, we are required to place 25% of the net offering proceeds, as defined, in an escrow account to satisfy our payment obligations of certain earn-out provisions. These funds have not been placed into escrow pending agreement between the Company and the sellers regarding the financial institution that will escrow the funds, the amount of funds that are to be placed in escrow and the escrow agreement itself (see Note 4 to the accompanying Form 10-K Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus).
In connection with the Series D First Closing, on December 20, 2012, we filed a Certificate of Designation of Series D Preferred Stock (the “Series D Certificate of Designation”) with the Secretary of State of Delaware. Pursuant to the Series D Certificate of Designation, we designated 4,000,000 shares of our preferred stock as Series D Preferred Stock. The Series D Preferred Stock has a Stated Value of $10.00 per share, votes on an as-converted basis with the common stock, and is convertible, at the option of the holder, into such number of shares of our common stock equal to the number of shares of Series D Preferred Stock to be converted, multiplied by the Stated Value, divided by the Conversion Price in effect at the time of the conversion. The initial Conversion Price is $1.00, subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar transactions, and in the event of subsequent equity sales at a lower price per share, subject to certain exceptions. The Series D Preferred Stock entitles the holder to cumulative dividends, payable quarterly, at an annual rate of (i) 8% of the Stated Value during the three year period commencing on the date of issue, and (ii) 12% of the Stated Value commencing three years after the date of issue. We may, at our option, pay dividends in PIK Shares, in which event the applicable dividend rate will be 12% and the number of such PIK Shares issuable will be equal to the aggregate dividend payable divided by the lesser of (x) the then effective Conversion Price or (y) the average volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the five prior consecutive trading days.
Pursuant to the Series D Certificate of Designation, upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of our Company, holders of Series D Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive, for each share of Series D Preferred Stock, an amount equal to the Stated Value of $10.00 per share plus any accrued but unpaid dividends thereon before any distribution or payment may be made to the holders of any common stock, Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, or subsequently issued preferred stock.  

Pursuant to the Series D Certificate of Designation, commencing on the trading day on which the closing price of the common stock is greater than $2.00 for thirty consecutive trading days with a minimum average daily trading volume of at least 5,000 shares for such period, and at any time thereafter, the Company in its sole discretion may effect the conversion of all of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock to common stock (subject to the condition that, all of the shares issuable upon such conversion may be re-sold without limitation under an effective registration statement or pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Pursuant to the Series D Certificate of Designation, commencing two years from the termination or expiration of the offering of the Series D Preferred Stock (which termination occurred on December 31, 2012), and at any time thereafter, the Company in its sole discretion may redeem all of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $10.00 per share plus any accrued but unpaid dividends.

Illume Mobile Acquisition

On July 31, 2012 (the “Illume Mobile Closing Date”), we entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Illume Mobile Purchase Agreement”) with MacroSolve, Inc. (the “Seller”). Pursuant to the Illume Mobile Purchase Agreement, we purchased the business (including substantially all the related assets) of the Seller’s Illume Mobile division (“Illume Mobile”), for a purchase price of $1,000,000, of which $250,000 was paid in cash and $750,000 was paid in the form of 617,284 shares of our common stock.  The number of shares to be issued was based on a value of $1.215 per share which was based on the volume weighted-average trading price of our common stock over the twenty trading days prior to the Illume Mobile Closing Date.  Pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, we will be required to make an additional payment (“Additional Payment”) to the Seller of up to $500,000 based on the achievement of specified levels of net revenue during the twelve months ending July 31, 2013, of which 50% will be paid in cash, and 50% will be paid in shares of common stock.  The value of the shares will be based on the closing price of our common stock on the one year anniversary of the Illume Mobile Closing Date.  The Additional Payment will be paid within 30 days of the one year anniversary of the Closing Date.  The Illume Mobile business acquired includes patent protected domain expertise in developing Enterprise mobile software for Android and Apple (iOS) mobile devices.
Apex Systems Integrators, Inc. Acquisition

On June 4, 2012 (the “Apex Closing Date”), pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Apex Systems Integrators Inc. (“Apex”), a corporation organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada.  Apex is a provider of wireless mobile work force software solutions.  Its suite of products utilizes the latest technologies to empower the mobile worker in many areas including merchandising, sales and delivery; field service; logistics and transportation; and, warehouse management.  Its clients are North American companies that are household names whose products and services are used daily to feed, transport, entertain and care for people throughout the world.

In consideration for the shares of Apex, we paid CDN$5,000,000 (US$4,801,000 at the Apex Closing Date) in cash.  We may be required to pay up to an undiscounted amount of CDN$3,500,000 (US$3,360,700 at the Apex Closing Date) in consideration  for Apex achieving certain levels of adjusted earnings before interest, depreciation, taxes and amortization during the twelve months ending July 2013.  

Overview

DecisionPoint enables our clients to “move decisions closer to the customer” by “empowering the mobile worker”. We define the mobile worker as those individuals that are on the front line in direct contact with customers. These workers include field repair technicians, sales associates, couriers, public safety employees and millions of other workers that deliver goods and or services throughout the country.  Whether they are blue or white collar, mobile workers have many characteristics in common. Mobile workers need information, access to corporate resources, decision support tools and the ability to capture and report information back to the organization.
DecisionPoint empowers these mobile workers through the implementation of various mobile technologies including specialized mobile business applications, wireless networks, mobile computers (for example, rugged, tablets, and smartphones) and a comprehensive suite of consulting, integration, deployment and support services.
Mobile computing capabilities and usage continue to grow. With choice comes complexity so helping our customers navigate the myriad of options is what we do best.  The right choice may be an off-the-shelf application or a custom business application to fit a very specific business process. DecisionPoint has the specialized resources and support structure to address the needs of mobile applications in the retail, transportation, field workforce sales/service and the warehousing market segments. We continue to invest in building out our capabilities to support these markets and business needs. For example, in July 2012, we invested in the expansion of our custom software development capabilities through the acquisition of Illume Mobile in Tulsa, OK, which specializes in the custom development of specialized mobile business applications for Apple, Android and Windows Mobile devices. Additionally, through the acquisition of Illume Mobile we acquired a cloud-based, horizontal software application “ContentSentral” which manages and distributes multiple types of corporate content (for example, PDF, video, images, and spreadsheets) on mobile tablets used by field workers.  We also dramatically increased our software products expertise with the acquisition in June 2012 of APEX in Canada. The APEXWare™ software suite significantly expanded our field sales/service software offerings.  APEXWare™ is a purpose-built mobile application suite ideally suited to the automation of field sales/service and warehouse workers. Additionally, we continue to expand our deployment and MobileCare support offerings. In 2012 we moved our headquarters location to a larger facility in Irvine, CA in order to accommodate the expansion of our express depot and technical support organizations. We also continue to invest in our “MobileCare EMM�� enterprise mobility management offering. In 2008, we recognized the need for customers to outsource their mobile device management (“MDM”) needs, thus we invested in building out a MDM practice that offers these services under a comprehensive managed service model. We have extended this offering from our historically ruggedized mobile computer customer base to address the growth of consumer devices in the enterprise and support the Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Bring Your Own Application (BYOA) movement.

Recognizing that we cannot build every business application, we have developed an ‘ecosystem’ of partners which support our custom and off-the-shelf solutions. These partners include suppliers of mobile devices (Apple, Intermec, Motorola, among others), wireless carriers (AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, Verizon),  mobile peripheral manufactures (Zebra Technologies Corporation, Datamax - O’Neil), in addition to a host of specialized independent software vendors such as AirWatch, VeriFone GlobalBay, XRS and Wavelink.
We are focused on several commercial enterprise markets. These include retail, field sales/service, warehousing and distribution and transportation. With the continued growth of the mobile internet, we expect to see our current markets growth in addition to the emergence of new markets. In order to identify these new markets we recently created a new internal organization whose sole purpose is to identify and nurture new market opportunities. We expect our customers to continue to embrace and deploy new technology to better enhance their own customers’ experiences and improve their own operations while lowering their operating costs. Our expertise and understanding of our customers’ operations and business operations in general, coupled with our expertise and understanding of mobile technology equipment and software offerings enables us to identify new trends and opportunities and provide these new solutions to our existing and potential customers.

At DecisionPoint, we deliver to our customers the ability to make better, faster and more accurate business decisions by implementing industry-specific, enterprise wireless and mobile computing systems for their front-line mobile workers, inside and outside of the traditional workplace. It is these systems that provide the information to improve the hundreds of individual business decisions made each day.  Historically, critical information has remained locked away in the organization’s enterprise computing systems, accessible only when employees were at their desk. Our solutions unlock this information and deliver it to employees when needed regardless of their location.  As a result, our customers are able to move their business decision points closer to their customers which we believe in turn improves customer service levels, reduces cost and accelerates business growth.
We have several offices throughout North America which allows us to serve our multi-location clients and their mobile workforces.  We provide depot services through our West and East coast facilities.  Additionally, we are always keenly aware of potential acquisition candidates that can provide complementary products and service offerings to our customer base.
Marketplace

Industry

The Enterprise Mobile Computing industry continues to grow on many fronts. The industry’s early growth was fueled through the standardization of several key technologies such as the Windows Mobile operating system, 802.11 a/b/g “Wi-Fi” wireless local area networks, and robust nationwide wireless carrier data networks such as Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon. The more recent advances in “consumer” class smartphones and tablets have enabled new applications and expanded the market’s reach to field worker applications that previously could not justify the cost of traditional rugged mobile computers.

In the last 12 months we have seen an increase in the deployment of “consumer” smartphones and tablet computers in order to support a broadening set of mobile user needs. While a few of these deployments have been in response to reducing the deployment costs of traditional ruggedized mobile devices, the majority represent new deployments in markets which were previously under-serviced and thus represent new market opportunities.

The industry is comprised of companies that bring specific value to one or more elements of the overall customer solution.  These specialized companies can be grouped into the following categories:
Hardware manufacturers such as Motorola Solutions, Intermec Corporation and Zebra Technologies each provide specialized mobile computers and peripherals.
Wireless Carriers such as Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon provide robust data and voice networks.
Specialized application providers (ISVs) that focus on providing mobile applications to meet specific industry and business requirements. Our APEXWare™ are solution set is one such example.
Systems integrators such as DecisionPoint that work directly with the end user to define the business requirement and then design and develop the final solution using our existing intellectual property or components from other providers.
Determining which enterprise mobile solution we deliver to our customers depends on several key factors including the customer’s industry, size and business objectives. Successful solution selection requires that providers possess industry domain expertise, business application expertise and mobile computing and wireless networking technical acumen.  DecisionPoint possesses this knowledge and skillset in our target markets.

In addition to offering hardware and specialized mobile applications, we also provide a complete line of consulting, deployment and integration services, including site surveys, equipment configuration and staging, system installation, depot services, software support, training programs and project management.
Current Market Environment

Over the last several years, we have been repositioning ourselves to move up the solution value chain by focusing on higher margin software and consulting services along with customer-driven mobile wireless solutions rather than providing simply hardware and customized software as a reseller. This is the key to increasing our profitability and is also a major point of differentiation. The acquisitions of CMAC, Apex and Illume Mobile are instrumental in this repositioning.  Small resellers and large catalog resellers simply do not want to, or cannot, provide the hands-on services and mobile application needs to make these systems successful. Our major ecosystem partners recognize this and have come to depend more on us to deliver the business value that their products enable.

The result is that our partners are referring more end-user demand to DecisionPoint than ever before because they require our deep domain knowledge in our chosen markets, our mobile application solutions, consulting services and our deployment and support capabilities. Today, a majority of Motorola, Intermec and Zebra Technologies’ product sales are through the sales channel in which we participate.

We benefit from other advantages by participating in this sales channel. The industry leaders have established program rewards, such as a favorable pricing structure and promotional incentives for their top-tier partners such as DecisionPoint. As a result, we invest in training for our personnel, which differentiate us from other potential competitors whose personnel may not have the same training or experience as ours. Within our enterprise markets, we believe there continues to be long-term opportunity for growth as the global workforce continues to become more mobile and the industries and markets that purchase our products and services continue to expand. The markets in which we compete include mobile computing products and services, enterprise wireless services, bar code scanning and mobile network management platforms. Organizations looking to increase productivity and derive benefits from empowering their mobile workforce are driving adoption of our solutions.
Our strategy in our target markets is to enable our customers to focus on their missions, not the technology. This is accomplished by providing mission-critical systems, seamless connectivity through highly reliable voice and data networks and a suite of advanced and/or custom applications that provide real-time information to mobile workers.

DecisionPoint Target Markets

The markets for enterprise wireless and mobile computing are very fragmented and extremely complex.  But generally they can be characterized by the following attributes:

1.  Vertical market industries which require specific domain expertise.
2.  Industries which track goods or deliver a service in the field (or both).
3.  Industries which have a significant group of mobile workers, whether they operate primarily in one place or in the field.

In the commercial enterprise market, we seek to deliver products and services that are designed to empower the mobile workforce to increase productivity, expand sales, drive cost effectiveness and promote faster execution of critical business processes.

Vertical Markets

The attractiveness of any vertical market depends directly on the size and nature of the problems which that market faces that can be addressed by enterprise wireless and mobile computing.  Historically, retail, warehousing, and manufacturing were the largest industries.  Each typically had large amounts of goods in constant motion which needed to be tracked.  In addition, each had a workforce which primarily operated in one place (i.e. a retail store, a distribution center or a factory).

Although these markets are still attractive for us and comprise a sizeable portion of our business, we believe new markets are emerging which hold as great or even greater promise than our historical markets.

Transportation, logistics and field services such as repair and maintenance, delivery and inspections are now emerging as new markets. This is primarily due to the arrival of robust, national wireless carrier networks that can reach field-based mobile workers almost anywhere they are. The general term for this new group of markets is referred to as “Field Mobility”.  Although it cuts across multiple industries and business applications, it has one common characteristic: goods are tracked or services are being performed by field-based workforces, not workers operating in a single location under one roof.

Our Field Mobility Practice

We established our Field Mobility practice in 2008 with the express purpose of replicating our historical success with a new set of customers together with a new ecosystem of partners including Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon. We have an informal arrangement with these partners pursuant to which they provide referrals of their airtime customers that are interested in field mobility solutions.  We, in turn, provide solutions which require cellular data networks. We have experienced year over year growth in this segment and believe this trend will continue due to the adoption of smartphones, tablet computers and the continued cost reductions and increased access of cellular data networks. The carriers not only bring potential new opportunities but also have attractive programs which allow us to earn additional revenue when we facilitate service of mobile computers and devices on their networks. 
Our acquisitions of APEX and Illume Mobile further demonstrate our belief in this market.  The APEXWare™ are product suite is ideally suited for empowering field based sales and service workers whereas ContentSentral provides a unique content delivery capability that enables a new class of mobile information empowerment to field workers that need real-time access to corporate content.

Products and Services

Mobile Applications

We deploy mobile applications to address a wide variety of business processes, depending on the industry.  Below is a brief overview of some of those applications by industry:

Retail Store: Stock locator, shelf price marking, markdowns, inventory control, physical inventory, merchandising, customer service and mobile point-of-sale (“MPOS”).
Warehousing and Distribution: Order shipping, order picking and packing, stock move and replenishments, product receipt and put-away, labeling, physical inventory and cycle counts.
Transportation and Logistics: Proof-of-delivery, commercial turn-by-turn directions, route optimization, cross-docking, returns and Department of Transportation driver hours of service and route logging.
Field Mobility: Field service and repair, merchandising, field sales, work order management, asset management, inspection, preventative maintenance, surveys, rounds and readings.

Software

Unlike the market for standardized business software such as email or accounting, the market for enterprise mobile software is more specialized. One size does not fit all. Enterprise mobile software systems must support industry-specific and customer-specific business processes. For this reason, we utilize several avenues to provide mobile software solutions to meet our customers’ unique requirements.

DecisionPoint owned and delivered solutions:

APEXWare™ Field Service (FS) enables customers to capture lost revenue, provide proof of service delivery, reduce inventory shrinkage, and reduce back office administration. A field deployment of wireless handheld devices with integrated bar code scanners enables the business to run completely paperless. APEXWare™ FS is also offered as a hosted subscription service, thus eliminating the need for costly IT infrastructure (on-site server, IT resources).
APEXWare™ Merchandising, Sales and Delivery (MSD) is a powerful solution that maintains and optimizes customers’ efficiency in the field by automating processes that would otherwise be time consuming and error-prone. APEXWare™ MSD provides significant value by streamlining merchandising, sales and delivery business functions. Mobile devices with integrated bar code scanners enable workers to perform multiple job functions to help achieve new sales growth and reduce costs. The solution is ideally suited for business regardless of size or industry.
APEXWare™ Warehouse Management System (WMS) transforms current warehouse operations to a paperless, real-time operation. With the use of wireless devices APEXWare™ WMS reduces errors, improves worker efficiencies and ensures greater transaction accuracy. Mobile devices such as handheld mobile computers and vehicle mounted computers with integrated bar code scanners ensure accurate and efficient pick and put-away functions. APEXWare™ WMS is a powerful warehouse management system that maintains accurate inventory throughout the warehouse to optimize efficiency.
ContentSentral is a content delivery service that enables mobile workers in virtually any industry to access corporate information which enables better customer interaction and a more satisfying customer experience. It also provides the added benefit of allowing companies to closely manage versions of key documents used in the field. ContentSentral easily connects to corporate data sources and delivers multiple content formats including:
Video
PDF
PowerPoint™
Images
Word Documents™
Spread sheets

DecisionPoint custom development: When one of our off-the-shelve solutions or an ISV solution is not available, custom software can be created in-house using standardized programming platforms like Microsoft.NET® framework, Java™, Android and Apple iOS. These are used when there is simply no other “off-the-shelf” way to meet the customer’s requirements or when a client believes their business requirements are so unique that only a custom solution will work. An increasingly popular requirement for many corporate clients, which we are able to fulfill, is a custom application that is written once, but supports multiple mobile operating systems.

Resold specialized ISV applications:  The software produced by specialized ISVs is designed to fit a particular vertical market and application. Even still, it must be tailored to meet the needs of each customer and often requires integration to the customer’s enterprise system(s). Depending on the requirements, this tailoring is provided by DecisionPoint or by the ISV themselves under contract to DecisionPoint. We have built a network of market and application focused ISVs specializing in Field Mobility applications for this purpose. In short, an ISV application, ruggedized mobile hardware, a wireless network, deployment services, and ongoing system support can be delivered by DecisionPoint more effectively and with less risk than with any other combination of providers.
Professional Services

Our professional services offerings fall into one of three categories: business consulting, technical consulting and technical development. Business consulting is where we engage with our customer to help them understand the potential return on investment (ROI), of implementing mobile computing, or supply chain services as examples, for a particular business process. Technical consulting services help determine the technology to be used and how it is to be implemented. We utilize our evaluation techniques, tools, and experience to recommend the optimal technology solution that provides organizational, operational and system improvements to our customers. We take advantage of our database and assessment methodology to quickly identify viable solutions for client operations. Once the solution is identified and selected, we apply our fast track “3D” (Define, Design, Deliver) implementation methodology to ensure project success. Technical development includes actual software programming and configuration of the mobile computing, WMS and TMS application solutions as well as interface software needed to connect to our customer’s existing back-office systems.

Our full suite of professional services allow for many “areas of engagement” with our customer base. We can initiate and engage on an opportunity in several areas of the project lifecycle. The professional services listed below allow us to provide value to organizations regardless of where the customer is in their project evaluation/implementation or rollout:

● Engineering & Material Handling● Back office integration development
● Facility Automation● Site Surveys & Installation
● Supply Chain Strategy● Change Management
● Six Sigma & Lean Six Sigma● Resource Augmentation
● WMS/3PL Selection & Support● Temp-to-Perm
● Call Center Outsourcing● Contract-to-Hire or Direct Hire
● Project Management● Work Flow Management
● WMS/ERP Implementation● Transportation Management
Supply Chain Services

Supply Chain services include Pre-Contract, Pre Go-Live and Post Go-Live solutions. Our project team will engage and manage the project from end-to-end, allowing the customer resources to stay focused on their tasks. Many of the services that we provide are listed below:

Pre-ContractPre Go-LivePost Go-Live
Project ManagementCRP ExecutionPost implementation audit
Solution DesignTraining DocumentsSystem re-configuration
Application StudyJob Aid DevelopmentCustom report design and development
CRP Script DevelopmentTraining ExecutionEDI Interface design and development
CRP Configuration & SetupSoftware ConfigurationIssues documentation and management
Current State DesignTechnical SupportTraining and certification
Future State DesignSystem Interface Development/ProgrammingSatisfaction surveys/ process improvement
Mobility Readiness EvaluationImplementation SupportEnhancement management/ implementation
ROI Targets/WorksheetModification Specification & DesignMulti-site rollout
Proof of Concept DesignTestingService Level Agreement
Host application requirementsVendor ManagementROI Analysis
Device application requirementsCustom ReportsOngoing Support

Deployment and Support Services

These services involve installing a solution into the customer’s environment (“implementation”) and then replicating that implementation to all their operating locations (“rollout”). The rollout is critical because unless the mobile computing solution is rolled out across all operating locations, the desired ROI will be limited.

We offer a wide range of services in this category. They include assembling kits of everything needed for the system on a per location basis (“kitting”) to providing logistical services for rollout (“staging”), to advanced exchange services for broken units in the field, to help desk support and to a self-service portal where a customer can check the status of a service case or equipment repair ticket.

For Field Mobility projects, carrier activation is a key service. Activation is where we actually activate mobile computers and/or devices to run on the carrier networks. Not only is this a key service to complete projects, but it is also a source of revenue for us when the carriers pay us to activate mobile computers and/or devices to operate on the carrier networks.
In addition, we offer staff augmentation services to customers that allow for shorter term projects or implementations, workflow management teams for cyclical business customers, as well as contract-to-hire resources that engage on supply chain projects and can convert to a permanent position at the customer location, which helps significantly with the knowledge transfer as well as capital knowledge base. Contract-to-hire solutions have proven beneficial for customers to overcome workforce issues during hiring freezes by allowing them to deploy solutions and then convert resources to full-time status upon expiration of the hiring freeze.

Finally, we are continuing our investments in managed service offerings and software as a service, or SaaS categories. Increasingly, customers want to outsource various aspects of operating and maintaining their enterprise mobile systems. Our MobileCare™ EMM (enterprise mobility management) service offering allows us to remotely manage customers’ mobile computers and applications on a SaaS subscription basis.

Hardware

Our hardware reseller sales strategy is designed to avoid competing for hardware sales based solely on price. Throughout the sales cycle, we are diligent to point out to a customer that hardware is only one component of the complete solution they are looking for.  By bundling the software and services with the hardware, we position ourselves as the value-added solution provider. This positioning differentiates us from the low-price, ‘discount’ hardware resellers who do not have this capability.

We offer the following types of enterprise wireless and mobile computing hardware on a cost competitive basis:

Handheld and vehicle mounted, ruggedized mobile computers
802.11 a/b/g/ wireless LAN (“Wi-Fi”) infrastructure
GPS receivers
Two-way radios
Handheld barcode scanners
Barcode label and RFID printers and encoders
Laptops and tablet computers for rugged environments
Consumer smartphone and tablet computers

Consumables

We have extensive expertise in bar code consumables solutions. We offer a full line of high quality labels, RFID tags, and printer ribbons to meet the demands of every printing system. We select the right components from a wide range of products on the market from both independent and original equipment manufacturers of printers and RFID printers/encoders. Matching media to the unique application is what makes the system work. In addition, consumables are essentially a recurring revenue stream once a customer has their system up and running.

Sales and Marketing

Customer Base

Our historical success has largely followed the broad adoption of enterprise wireless and mobile computing technology industry by industry. As mentioned above, this adoption pattern started with retail stores and moved backward through the retail supply chain into distribution and then manufacturing. It also spread horizontally from the retail supply chain into the supply chain of industrial goods as well. Our products and services are sold nationwide to a diverse set of customers such as retail, utility, transportation and logistics, manufacturing, wholesale and distribution and other commercial customers.

Our customers include:

Retailers in various categories and sizes.
Manufacturing companies..
Transportation, warehousing and distribution, including logistics companies.
A common element of many customers is that they are new to mobile computing and thus have limited staff or expertise to deploy and support such programs. As such, DecisionPoint is an ideal partner for these customers in that our portfolio of development, deployment and support services ensure the success of their mobile and wireless projects.
We aim to deliver the ‘entire solution’ to our customers, from solution design through support. Our objective is to target markets that will permit the delivery of as many of these products and services as possible, so as to maximize the profit opportunity while minimizing the costs of sale and delivery.

Thus, we seek to classify the type of customer that we target in order to quickly and cost-effectively put the correct amount of resources on each opportunity. The three main customer classifications are:
Full Solution Customer - This is a customer that wants us to provide not only the entire solution from initial consultation, design, development and deployment, but also the ongoing support of the system.  Such an end-user views the entire system as critical to its business and wants to outsource it to industry professionals.  This is the ideal customer for us, one that understands and values the cost effectiveness of the entire solution and ongoing support of the system.
Customer as their own integrator - The customer sources all the parts and pieces of the system, programs it, installs it, commissions it and supports it.  In effect, the customer is their own integrator, and wants to buy products and services only in a transactional relationship.  DecisionPoint limits its resources to provide these customers with competitive product and service pricing.
Hybrid Customer - Such customers have some systems integration capability themselves but have also recognized that “they know what they don’t know” and are willing to contract for certain services as part of an enhanced transactional relationship.  A Hybrid Customer is attractive on a case-by-case basis depending on the circumstances of the situation.

In each of the three scenarios above, we strive to position our software and professional services as a core value-added component to the customer. Through our ability to reliably test, configure, kit, stage, and deploy large rollouts of mobile computers for specialized applications, we seek to enable our customers to maximize the benefits of mobile computing while minimizing the risks associated with implementation.

Sales and Sales Support

We support our business model using field-based teams of seasoned account executives with both pre- and post- sale systems architects who are experienced in all areas of enterprise mobile computing. Their focus is to develop customers’ enterprise mobile computing requirements in order to develop solutions for them and ultimately close business for our product and service set that fulfills those requirements.

We fulfill the need for application software both in-house and through ISVs depending on specific customer need. ISVs embrace this model because they are generally looking for sales, marketing and integration partners like us to expand their own reach.

We currently employ 95 people in our marketing, sales and professional services operation. They include 2 marketing professionals and 33 sales people, all of whom are qualified in system technology design, installation and integration. They receive substantial technical support and assistance from 31 systems engineers and technicians and 24 software engineers. Supporting the sales and marketing effort are 5 sales administrators, who are responsible for the detailed order entry and for the inputting of the related data into our accounting system.

Geographically, the sales team is spread throughout North America and can handle projects on a national and international basis from its East and West coast facilities. When a situation dictates, we may utilize independent contractors.

Sales System Support: SalesForce.com

We make extensive use of the salesforce.com customer relationship management (“CRM”) system to support our sales and marketing operations. All business processes from demand creation through closing orders are tracked using salesforce.com. This includes the following business processes: marketing campaign management, lead generation, sales opportunity and pipeline management, sales forecasting, sales territory and account management, and strategic account planning.

In addition, all professional services projects and time are tracked using salesforce.com.  These tools allow us to get a better understanding of project profitability which helps us manage our key project resources.
Marketing Activities

We address our target markets through a combination of our own marketing activities, relationship selling and vendor-supplied leads. The common aim is to establish our credibility in the space, and then definitively demonstrate to the potential customer that we can tailor solutions to that customer’s needs.
Our seasoned sales team also provides many sales opportunities through past relationships and detailed domain knowledge of the operations of the top companies in the target market space. Given that enterprise wireless and mobile computing systems are a complex sale, it is very beneficial to have knowledge of how individual companies actually operate, how they address IT systems issues, and how they buy and manage complex technology. Our sales teams use such information to their advantage against some of the commodity-type resellers in the space.

Vendor-supplied leads play a part in our success as well, in that vendors see it to their advantage to funnel sales opportunities to us thereby minimizing their selling costs. They are also willing to spend a sizeable portion of their discretionary marketing development budget for demand generation activities.
Our investment in our Field Mobility practice is generating sales and the establishment of a new sales channel. We have established key wireless carrier relationships with Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon and are now seeing benefits from those relationships. We have an informal arrangement with these carriers pursuant to which they provide us referrals of end users interested in field mobility solutions, and we, in turn, provide solutions which require cellular data networks.

Realizing that statistics show that the vast majority of B2B activity today starts with an Internet search, we have invested in some forward-thinking tools and technologies to help meet our future customers there. We continue to invest in our website, www.decisionpt.com , and we also have a complete online, closed-loop demand generation tool to track and manage leads to productively increase the sales pipeline. This includes email marketing with closed-loop feedback as well as email campaigns that track recipient behavior after their receipt in real time. This allows us to convert them into active prospects at the exact time they are investigating solutions for their particular problem.

Competition

The business in which we operate is highly competitive. Continued evolution in the industry, as well as technological advancements, is opening up the market to increased competition. Other key competitive factors include: industry consolidation; price; availability of financing; product and system performance; product quality, availability and warranty; the quality and availability of service; company reputation; and time-to-market. We believe we are uniquely positioned in the industry due to our strong customer and vendor relationships, our consultative and technological leadership and capabilities and our comprehensive range of offerings.

We compete with other VARs and System Integrators/engineering organizations (“SIs”) in system design, integration and maintenance arenas. However, as a Tier-1 reseller for major equipment vendors including Motorola Solutions and Zebra, we encounter fewer than ten competitive Tier-1 VARs and SIs representing these manufacturers in the marketplace.

We typically win business from such competitors based on our turnkey software engineering skills and one-stop-shop technical capabilities.  Recognizing us as a significant VAR within its universe of Tier-1 partners, Motorola Solutions has granted us variable pricing applicable to specific major customers.  These price discounts give us an edge in the marketplace through greater margin flexibility. As a result, we do not typically lose contracts due to price sensitivity.

Large system integrators are seeking to move further into this segment in which we compete. Competitors in this segment may also serve as subcontractors to large system integrators and are selected based on a number of competitive factors and customer requirements. Where favorable to us, we may partner with other system integrators to make available our portfolio of advanced mission-critical services, applications and devices. Our MobileCare EMM offering is one such offering that we subcontract to leading IT outsourcing companies like HP.

We have identified the following ten companies as primary competitors in the VAR and SI spaces:

Agilysys, Inc. (Nasdaq: AGYS) - Agilysys is a publicly traded NASDAQ company and is a leading provider of innovative technology solutions for the hospitality and retail markets. Agiliysys solutions include property and lodging management, inventory and procurement, point-of-sale (“POS”), document management, mobile, wireless and other types of guest-engagement software. Agilysys also provides support, maintenance, resold hardware products and software hosting services.  Agilysys has annual revenue of $100 million. Agilysys operates extensively throughout North America, with additional sales and support offices in the United Kingdom and Asia. Agilysys  has two operating segments: Hospitality Solutions Group (“HSG”) and Retail Solutions Group (“RSG”).
International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE: IBM) – Although significantly larger than us, IBM Mobility and Wireless Services seek to deliver the same type of value proposition to the market. IBM is a very large organization; enterprise wireless and mobile computing are just one of a large set of competencies and services they provide to the marketplace. To address growing needs of the mobile enterprise, IBM is expanding its software and services capabilities through acquisitions and organic innovation to provide customers with all the resources to develop a mobile computing strategy. In February 2012, IBM acquired Worklight, a privately held Israeli-based provider of mobile software for smartphones and tablets, an acquisitions that accelerates IBM’s mobile portfolio helping corporations leverage the proliferation of mobile devices for B2C, B2E and B2B.
Accenture plc (NYSE: ACN) – Accenture is a global management consulting, technology consulting and technology outsourcing company. Its global headquarters are in Dublin, Ireland.  It is the largest consulting firm in the world, as well as being a global player within the technology consulting industry.
Sedlak Management Consultants – Sedlak is a supply chain consulting firm specializing in distribution consulting. It is a privately-held Cleveland, Ohio-based company, and has been in business for over 50 years.
Peak-Ryzex– Maryland based Peak-Ryzex is an integrator of Automated Identification and Data Collection (“AIDC”) equipment including wireless RF, network and ERP integration solutions, enterprise printing, bar code scanning, mobile computing, and terminal and software technologies. Peak-Ryzex was originally built up by current DecisionPoint  CEO Nicholas Toms and former DecisionPoint CFO Donald Rowley, and was then sold to Moore Corporation (now RR Donnelley) in 1997. RR Donnelley, as part of its strategy to focus on commercial printing, sold Peak to Platinum Equity in December 2005. Keystone Capital, Inc. acquired Peak in October 2011, from Platinum Equity. During December 2011, Peak Technologies acquired Washington based Ryzex, a mobile technology solutions company and subsequently changed its name to Peak-Ryzex in 2012. During August 2012, Peak-Ryzex acquired Catalyst from CDC Global Services. Catalyst is a highly specialized SAP services partner and a leader in the design and implementation of SAP Supply Chain Management (SAP SCM) solutions.
Stratix, Inc. - Georgia based Stratix is a substantial competitor of DecisionPoint, especially in the South Eastern part of the U.S. Its customer base includes large nationally based Tier-1 retailers, distributors, major commercial airlines and general manufacturers    .     In December 2011, Stratix announced that Grey Mountain Partners had acquired a majority interest in the company. In 2012, Stratix, Inc. announced a strategic partnership with PiiComm, Inc., a provider of wireless and mobile workforce solutions for enterprise and government in Canada specializing in transportation & logistics, field services, warehouse and healthcare.
Denali Advanced Integration - Washington based Denali Advanced Integration is a full system integration company with services ranging from IT Consulting, Managed Services and Enterprise Mobility Solutions. Denali is a substantial competitor of DecisionPoint in the North Western part of the U.S. Denali Advanced Integration partners with major mobility vendors Motorola, Intermec and Zebra.
Group Mobile –Arizona based  Group Mobile is exclusively focused on providing a total solution to customers within the area of rugged, mobile, and field-use computing products.
Pariveda Solutions –Headquartered in Dallas Texas, Pariveda Solutions is an IT consulting company delivering both strategic consulting services and technical solutions to customers.
Barcoding, Inc. – Maryland based Barcoding helps organizations streamline their operations with automatic identification and data collection systems (AIDC). Clients include manufacturing, distribution, healthcare and warehousing enterprises, as well as state, local and federal agencies.
Other Competitors in the U.S. - Certain ‘catalog and online’ AIDC equipment resellers offer end-users deeply discounted, commodity oriented products; however, they typically offer limited or no maintenance support beyond the manufacturer’s warranty (which generally results in slower repair turnaround time). More importantly, as end users have become increasingly dependent on VARs and SIs to provide platform design, integration and maintenance, end users typically do not place major purchase orders with such resellers.

Employees
As of August 2013, we have a total of 112 full time employees and 1 part time employee.  We have not experienced any work disruptions or stoppages and we consider relations with our employees to be good.


We lease our office and warehouse facilities under various operating leases. Our corporate headquarters and sales operations, including sales administration, software development, depot operation and the financial management were previously located in Foothill Ranch, California where we leased 7,500 square feet of office space under a lease which expired in July 2012. In May 2012, we entered into a new office lease agreement for 10,325 square feet located in Irvine, California beginning in July 2012. The lease expires in July 2017. The current monthly rental expense is approximately $12,000.

In addition, we lease 4,100 square feet in Shelton, Connecticut for our East coast sales and operations under a lease which expires in April 2015. The current monthly rental expense is approximately $6,100.  In September 2012, the Company notified the landlord of its early termination of the lease effective April 2013. We also lease 6,800 square feet in Edison, New Jersey under a lease which expires in December 2014. The current monthly rental expense is approximately $4,200. We have a sales and administrative office located in Alpharetta, Georgia where we lease 5,100 square feet for general office purposes under a lease which expires in April 2015. In addition, we lease 4,800 square feet in Alpharetta, Georgia for our technology lab center under a lease which expires in April 2015. The current monthly rental expense for the sales and administrative office and the technology lab is approximately $12,000.

Effective upon the Closing Date of the purchase of Apex in June 2012, we assumed Apex’s lease of 7,800 square feet in Burlington, Ontario, Canada, which expires in March 2016. The current monthly rental expense is approximately CDN$10,000.

Effective upon the Illume Mobile Closing Date, we assumed the Illume Mobile lease of 10,000 square feet in Tulsa, Oklahoma which expires September 2013. The current monthly rental expense is approximately $12,000.

We believe that our properties are in good condition, adequately maintained and suitable for the conduct of our business. Certain of our lease agreements provide options to extend the lease for additional specified periods.

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.



The names of our executive officers and directors and their age and title as of the date of this prospectus are set forth below:
NameAgeTitle
Nicholas R. Toms64Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman
Michael Roe51Vice President, Finance, Principal Financial Officer
Donald Dalicandro52Former Chief Executive Officer of Apex, Director
Ralph S. Hubregsen53Chief Operating Officer
John E. Chis56Senior Vice President, Sales
Bryan E. Moss46Senior Vice President, Professional Services
David M. Rifkin57Director
Jay B. Sheehy57Director
Robert M. Chaiken49Director
Marc Ferland68Director
Lawrence Yelin69Director
Directors are elected annually and hold office until the next annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company and until their successors are elected. Officers are elected annually and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of each of our executive officers and directors for the past five years.

Nicholas R. Toms, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

Mr. Toms became CEO of DecisionPoint as of December 2003, when an ESOP that he organized together with Donald Rowley, the former CFO of the Company, acquired DecisionPoint. As a former corporate finance/M&A attorney with Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom, Mr. Toms is an entrepreneur and has been involved with middle market businesses for the past several years. He previously served as CEO of Cape Systems Group, Inc. (formerly Vertex Interactive, Inc.), a provider of warehouse management software systems. In 1989, Mr. Toms founded Peak Technologies where he served as Chairman, President and CEO.  In 1997, Peak was sold to Moore Corporation in a transaction valued at approximately $300 million.  In 1986, an investor group of which Mr. Toms was a principal, orchestrated the buyout of Thomson T-Line Plc, a publicly traded company based in London, England. Mr. Toms is a graduate of Stellenbosch University (South Africa) in economics and law (LL.B) and New York University (LL.M). Mr. Toms serves on the Board of Directors of Cape Systems Group.
Michael Roe, Vice President, Finance, Principal Financial Officer

Michael Roe has been serving as the Company’s Vice President, Finance since October 2012 and was named Principal Financial Officer in May 2013.  Prior to starting with the Company, Mr. Roe spent approximately one year as an independent financial consultant. From October 2006 to October 2011, Mr. Roe served as the Chief Accounting Officer for Metagenics, Inc., a global life sciences company. Mr. Roe previously worked with KPMG LLP in Orange County, California and is an active, licensed Certified Public Accountant and a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Don Dalicandro, Chief Executive Officer of Apex, Director

Mr. Dalicandro joined the Company upon the consummation of the acquisition of Apex Systems Integrators on June 4, 2012. Mr. Dalicandro founded Apex Systems Integrators in 1998. During his career he has founded, led and worked for companies in manufacturing, commercial property management and retail consulting services. In 2007, Mr. Dalicandro obtained his Chartered Director designation from The Directors College, Degroote School of Business. He currently holds Board positions with Joseph Brant Memorial Hospital, Vice-Chair and Governance Chair, Deposit Insurance Corporation of Ontario and Burlington Hydro Inc., Chair, Governance and Audit. Mr. Dalicandro has an honors engineering degree from the University of Waterloo and completed his MBA at McMaster University. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Ontario. Mr. Dalicandro is a Canadian citizen.
Ralph S. Hubregsen, Chief Operating Officer

Mr. Hubregsen joined the Company in September 2011, as Chief Operating Officer. From November 2010 until July 2011, Mr. Hubregsen was the Vice President of Worldwide Channels at Symplified, a cloud security company that provides a SaaS-based single sign-on and identity access management solution. From March 2009 until July 2011, Mr. Hubregsen was the President of Venado Technologies, a company that he founded, and which is an integrator of innovative software and service solutions for large commercial enterprise accounts, and Federal and State government agencies. Prior to that Mr. Hubregsen served as Vice President of Sales at MonoSphere, Inc., which he started in January 2006 until it was acquired by Quest Software in December 2008. In addition to founding Venado Technologies, Mr. Hubregsen founded the Saillant Consulting Group in 1998, which specialized in the delivery of content management and document management solutions for large Fortune 500 companies and federal agencies. Between 1995 and 1997, Mr. Hubregsen served as Vice President of Western Field Operations for Peak Technologies Group after Peak purchased Innovative Products and Peripherals (“IPPC”), a company also founded by Mr. Hubregsen and his partners. IPPC was a provider of mobility solutions for the industrial marketplace.  Mr. Hubregsen holds an MBA from the University of Denver and BA from Saint Michael's College.
John E. Chis, Senior Vice President, Sales

Mr. Chis joined DecisionPoint in November 2004, as General Manager and Vice President of Sales. Mr. Chis has been an integral part of the senior management leadership from 2004 until present with responsibility in operations, marketing, strategic planning, and partner development. Mr. Chis has over thirty years of Senior Management experience beginning his career at Telxon.  Mr. Chis also held senior management positions at Symbol Technologies in both Sales and Retail Vertical Lead. Mr. Chis is a graduate from The University Of Akron (College of Business) and has participated as an Advisor to the College of Business on their Advisory Board.

Bryan Moss, Senior Vice President, Professional Services
Mr. Moss joined DecisionPoint upon the consummation of the CMAC acquisition on December 31, 2010.  He has 21 years of Information Technology, Logistics, Sales, and Engineering experience. Mr. Moss had been a principal along with being the President of CMAC Inc. for the past 13 years. Prior to CMAC, he was Senior Manager of the Supply Chain Practice for Accenture, responsible for Alliances and Supply Chain Execution Systems Implementations. Mr. Moss served in a management capacity for 8 years with UPS and Burnham Logistics in Information Technology, Engineering, and Operations. He attended Southern Tech receiving a Bachelor of Science degree in Industrial Engineering with a Minor in Technical Sales.
David M. Rifkin, Director

Mr. Rifkin has been an investor in DecisionPoint and a Director since 2003. Mr. Rifkin is the President and CEO and co-owner of eGlobalfares, LLC, a software and solution provider to the travel industry since 2006.  From 2003 to 2006, Mr. Rifkin was the SVP of Corporate Sales and a member of the executive team at Adelman Travel Group, a top 10 U.S. travel management company. Mr. Rifkin also worked in the family businesses in insurance, real estate and travel. Mr. Rifkin has served on the Board of Directors of the Greater Valley Chamber of Commerce, Valley United Way, Griffin Hospital, Spooner House (Homeless Shelter), Visiting Nurse Assoc. of South Central CT, Hewitt Memorial Hospital and Valley Community Foundation. Mr. Rifkin received a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from Bucknell University.
Jay B. Sheehy, Director

Mr. Sheehy became associated with DecisionPoint as an early investor in 2003 and became a Director concurrent with the Merger.  Mr. Sheehy has been the President and Principal of Kamco Supply of New England, a $100 million building materials distribution business since 1996. From 1984-1995, Mr. Sheehy was President and Principal of Stanley Svea Building Supply until he merged the company into Kamco. Previously, Mr. Sheehy held an internal audit position at Connecticut Bank and Trust, Budget Analyst post with Combustion Engineering and was a Manager of Financial Analysis with PepsiCo. After graduating Bucknell University in 1977 with a bachelor’s degree in business administration he went on to earn an MBA from the University of Connecticut, APC from NYU and his CPA accreditation. Mr. Sheehy is a Trustee of The Gunnery School, a former Board Member of the Connecticut Business and Industry Association (CBIA) and a former officer of Churchill Casualty Insurance .

Robert M. Chaiken, Director

Mr. Chaiken became a Director and investor of DecisionPoint in November 2010. Mr. Chaiken has worked for Adelman Travel Group, a $600M privately-held travel management company, since 1991. Since 2008, he has served as Adelman Travel Group’s President. In previous roles he served as Adelman's Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller. His additional experience includes acquisitions, strategic partnerships organizational design, and travel technology development. He is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a B.B.A. from the University of Wisconsin with majors in accounting and information systems.
Marc Ferland, Director
Mr. Ferland  became a Director of DecisionPoint upon completion of the Merger. Mr. Ferland had served as President and Chief  Executive Officer of Copernic Inc. from March 2008   and on its Board of Directors since September 2007.  In November  2010, Copernic was sold to N. Harris Computer Corporation and he resigned his duties with Copernic and simultaneously assumed  the position of Chairman of  the Board  and  President/Chief Executive  Officer  of its successor,  Comamtech. Prior to his affiliation  with  Copernic  and Comamtech, Mr. Ferland  worked  in the venture capital  industry  in various capacities  with Microcell Caisse de Depot  et Placement du Quebec  (Canada's largest  pension  fund), VantagePoint (a Silicon  Valley venture capital  fund) and Gen24 Capital,  which  he co-founded.   Mr. Ferland also worked  in the Telecommunications industry  in senior roles with Cantel (now Rogers), Scotpage/Scotcom, Telesystem  National and Microcell Telecom. Mr. Ferland also spend almost 20 years in a variety  of management positions with Canadian General Electric.   He graduated from the University  of Montreal  with a B.A. honors in economics and did post graduate work at McGill University and Harvard  Business School.  Mr. Ferland is a Canadian citizen.
Lawrence Yelin, Director

Mr. Yelin became a Director of DecisionPoint upon completion of the Merger.  Mr. Yelin is an attorney, who has had his own practice since February, 2009.  From June 1980 until January 2009, he was attorney partner at the law firm of Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP.  Mr. Yelin is a Canadian citizen.

Committees of the Board

The Audit Committee members are Jay B. Sheehy, David M. Rifkin, and Robert M. Chaiken. The Audit Committee Chairman is Jay B. Sheehy. The Audit Committee assists our board in fulfilling its responsibility for the oversight of the quality and integrity of our accounting, auditing, and reporting practices, and such other duties as directed by the board. The committee's purpose is to oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes, the audits of our financial statements, the qualifications of our public accounting firm engaged by us as our independent auditor to prepare or issue an audit report on our financial statements. Jay B. Sheehy is the "audit committee financial expert" within the meaning of SEC rules and regulations.
The Compensation and Governance Committee members are Jay B. Sheehy, David M. Rifkin and Robert M. Chaiken. The Compensation and Governance Committee Chairman is David M. Rifkin. The Compensation Committee's role is to discharge our board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of our executives and to oversee and advise the board of directors on the adoption of policies that govern our compensation and benefit programs.
When considering whether directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, the Company and the Board focused primarily on the information discussed in each of the directors’ individual biographies set forth above. Mr. Toms has experience as Chairman, President and CEO in growing middle market businesses, such as Cape Systems Group, Inc. and Peak Technologies, engaged in providing consultative solutions including professional services, software and equipment. In particular, with regard to Mr. Rifkin, the Board considered his background in software development and significant expertise and background as a CEO, President and director of both private companies, such as eGlobalfares LLC, and community groups, such as Greater Valley Chamber of Commerce and Griffin Hospital. With regard to Mr. Sheehy, the Board considered his position as President of similar revenue size and entrepreneurial companies to DecisionPoint and his financial experience as a CPA qualifying him for being the Audit Committee Chairman. With regard to Mr. Chaiken, the Board considered his extensive experience in positions of President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer in growing entrepreneurial companies, such as Kamco Supply of New England and Stanley Svea Building Supply, whereby his understanding of business operations of a growing company can be best utilized and also qualifies him as a finance expert. Messer’s Ferland and Yelin were directors of our predecessor entity, Comamtech and therefore their experience in technology space proves invaluable to the Company.

Except as otherwise reported above, none of our directors have held directorships in other reporting companies and registered investment companies at any time during the past five years.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To our knowledge, during the last ten years, none of our directors and executive officers has:

Had a bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time.
Been convicted in a criminal proceeding or been subject to a pending criminal proceeding, excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses.
Been subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities.
Been found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC, or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.
Been the subject to, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reverse, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization, any registered entity, or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.  

Employment Agreements

 We have a standard three (3) year employment agreement with Mr. Bryan Moss, our Senior Vice President, as a result of the CMAC acquisition.  The agreement calls for an annual bonus upon achieving certain results of operations at CMAC.  None of the other terms of the agreement are out of the ordinary course of business.

We also have an employment agreement with Mr. Ralph S. Hubregsen, our Chief Operating Officer.  Pursuant to the Agreement, Mr. Hubregsen will be entitled to an annual bonus calculated pursuant to terms set forth in the Agreement. Additionally, Mr. Hubregsen will be granted options to purchase 50,000 common shares of the Company.  Such options will vest over three years.  The agreement also calls for a severance provision ranging from two months to twelve months of salary.

We have an employment agreement with Donald Dalicandro, our Former Chief Executive Officer of Apex, as a result of the Apex acquisition.  Under the employment agreement, the Company further agreed Mr. Dalicandro would be appointed to the Company’s board of directors effective June 4, 2012, and would not be removed from the Company’s board of directors during the Earn-Out Period (as defined in the employment agreement) and the Bonus Period (as defined in the employment agreement) except by except by death, bankruptcy, incapacity or voluntary resignation. The agreement calls for annual bonus upon achieving certain results of operation at Apex for the 12 months ending July 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers and any other directors or executive officers.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Executive Compensation
The following table summarizes all compensation recorded by DecisionPoint in each of the last two completed fiscal years for our principal executive officers and our three most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers as of the end of the last fiscal year.  Such officers are referred to herein as our “Named Officers”.
               Non-  Change in       
               Equity  Pension Value &       
         Stock  Option  Incentive  Nonqualified  All    
NameYear Salary  Bonus  Award  Award (1)  Plan  Deferred Comp  Other  Total 
                          
Nicholas R. Toms                      
 2012 $450,000  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $9,800  $459,800 
 2011  446,000   80,000   -   54,700   -   -   -   580,700 
                                  
Donald W. Rowley (2)                             
 2012  316,000   -   -   -   -   -   12,000   328,000 
 2011  421,000   80,000   -   54,700   -   -   2,200   557,900 
                                  
Ralph S. Hubregsen                             
 2012  275,000   -   -   -   -   -   10,000   285,000 
 2011  80,000   -   -   -   -   -   8,950   88,950 
                                  
John E. Chis                                
 2012  225,000   25,000   -   -   -   -   7,000   257,000 
 2011  225,000   25,000   -   66,000   -   -   -   316,000 
                                  
Bryan E. Moss                             
 2012  240,000   -   -   -   -   -   2,000   242,000 
 2011  230,000   -   -   -   -   -   -   230,000 
                                  
Don Dalicandro                             
 2012  105,000   -   -   -   -   -   -   105,000 
 2011  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
                                  
Paul E. Ross (3)                                
 2012  -   -   -   -   -   -   100,500   100,500 
 2011  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
  (1)  
The stock option awards represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards granted during the year completed in accordance with ASC 718 –     (see “Note 13 – Stock Option Plan” in our accompanying Notes to the Form 10- K Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus).     The Company grants stock options periodically to members of management.  The table reflects awards granted to each of the Named Executive Officers. The greater value of the grant to Mr. Chis compared to those of Mr. Toms and Mr. Rowley reflects the board’s decision to partially compensate Mr. Chis for the greater cash compensation provided to Mr. Toms and Mr. Rowley.
(2Mr. Rowley, former CFO, resigned from the Company effective July 23, 2012. The salary for Mr. Rowley includes $187,000 in separation expenses per his contract and $41,000 in vacation payout.
(3Mr. Ross, interim CFO, was paid on a consulting basis at $30,000 per month which includes a placement agency fee.

 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to outstanding equity awards at December 31, 2012, for each of the executive officers.
  Option Awards Stock Awards 
                          
Name Number  Number  Equity  Option Option Number  Market  Equity  Equity 
  of  Of  Incentive  Exercise Expiration of Shares  Value of  Incentive  Incentive 
  Securities  Securities  Plan  Price Date or Units  Shares or  Plan  Plan 
  Underlying  Underlying  Awards:  ($)   of Stock  Units of  Awards:  Awards: 
  Unexercised  Unexercised  Number of      That  Stock  Number of  Market or 
  Options  Options  Securities      Have  That  Unearned  Payout 
  (#)  (#)  Underlying      Not  Have  Shares,  Value of 
  Exercisable  Unexercisable  Unexercised      Vested  Not  Units or  Unearned 
          Unearned      (#)  Vested  Other  Shares, 
          Options          (#)  Rights  Units or 
          (#)              That Have  Other 
                          Not Vested  Rights 
                          (#)  That Have 
                              Not Vested 
                              ($) 
                                
Nicolas R. Toms                            
   158,381   -   -  $1.45 1/2/2014  -   -   -  $- 
   13,542   -   -   1.90 12/31/2016  -   -   -   - 
   8,019   32,077   -   2.17 6/15/2021  -   -   -   - 
                                  
Ralph S. Hubregsen                          
   -   -   -   -    -   -   -   - 
                                  
John E. Chis                              
   33,854   -   -   1.90 12/31/2016  -   -   -   - 
   3,386   5,078   -   2.10 2/12/2019  -   -   -   - 
   9,678   38,714   -   2.17 6/15/2021  -   -   -   - 
                                  
Bryan E. Moss                              
   -   -   -   -    -   -   -   - 
                                  
Except as set forth above, no other named officer of DecisionPoint has received an equity award.
Director Compensation

The following table sets forth with respect to the named director, compensation information inclusive of equity awards and payments made during the year ended December 31, 2012
              Change in       
              Pension Value       
  Fees Earned           & Nonqualified       
  Earned        Non-Equity  Deferred       
  Or  Stock  Option  Incentive Plan  Compensation  All Other    
Name Paid in Cash  Awards  Awards  Compensation  Earnings  Compensation  Total 
                      
David M. Rifkin $53,000  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $53,000 
Jay B. Sheehy  58,000   -   -   -   -   -   58,000 
Robert M. Chaiken  48,000   -   -   -   -   -   48,000 
Sigma Capital Advisors, LLC  48,000   -   -   -   -   -   48,000 
Marc Ferland  48,000   -   -   -   -   -   48,000 
Lawrence Yelin  48,000   -   -   -   -   -   48,000 
We purchase and sell certain products and services from iTEK Services, Inc. (“iTEK”), a privately held company owned by an unrelated ESOP. iTEK was affiliated with us through limited overlapping management and Board representation by our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Nicolas Toms and former Chief Financial Officer (“former CFO”), Donald Rowley.

Effective upon the resignation of the Company’s former CFO during July 2012, and the concurrent discontinuance of the CEO’s iTEK Board representation, the parties have no further overlapping management and therefore are no longer considered related parties effective August 2012.
During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we purchased products and services for $20,000 and $402,000, respectively, from iTEK. Sales to iTEK during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $0 and $4,000, respectively.  These sales to iTEK were at no incremental margin over our actual cost. Purchases from iTEK are on similar terms that we would have received from an unrelated third-party.
Amounts receivable from iTek included in accounts receivable in the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2013, December 31, 2012 and 2011 are $0, $5,000 and $0, respectively. Amounts due to iTEK included in accounts payable in the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2013, December 31, 2012 and 2011, are $25,000, $39,000 and $16,000, respectively.

We had accounts payable, including accrued interest, to our former CFO, Donald Rowley, of $0, $0, $855,000, 1,227,335 and $1,225,000 at June 30, 2013, December 31, 2012, December 31, 2011, June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The outstanding accounts payable balance accrued interest at 12% per annum, reduced from 25% in June 2011. The accounts payable consisted of purchases of products and services made by the former CFO on behalf of the Company, unreimbursed company travel expenses and interest on the accounts payable.

On June 30, 2011, the Company, Sigma Opportunity Fund II, LLC and Donald W. Rowley entered into an agreement pursuant to which Mr. Rowley converted $411,733 of the $1,227,335 in accounts payable owed to him by the Company (the “AP Amount”) into 128,667 shares of the Company’s Series C Preferred Stock and 49,000 shares of common stock.  Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Rowley also agreed that the interest rate of the balance of the AP Amount not covered by the agreement shall be reduced to 12% per annum until such time as the annual dividend rate on the Series C Preferred Stock is increased to 12% per annum (month 17) and 20% per annum (month 31), at which times the interest rate on the AP Amount then outstanding shall be 16% and 25%, respectively.  

On July 23, 2012, we entered into a Separation Agreement and General Release (“Separation Agreement”) with Mr. Rowley pursuant to which Mr. Rowley resigned as our Chief Financial Officer as of July 23, 2012 and as an employee of ours on July 23, 2012.  Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, we agreed to pay Mr. Rowley a total of $205,592 in equal installments in accordance with our payroll cycle beginning on August 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012. Additionally under the Separation Agreement, the Company also acknowledged that it owes Mr. Rowley an accounts payable in the amount of $890,633, which we agreed to pay in accordance with an Accounts Payable Payment Plan agreement, between the Company and Mr. Rowley dated July 23, 2012 ("Accounts Payable Agreement"). Pursuant to the Account Payable Agreement, the Company agreed to pay interest monthly in arrears (starting on August  1, 2012)  to Mr. Rowley with interest computed daily on the outstanding  balance at an annual interest rate of 25%. Under the Accounts Payable Agreement, the Company agreed to make payments of $36,000 per month due on the 1st of each month to Mr. Rowley towards the outstanding balance. In September 2012, the Company paid $921,000 to Mr. Rowley, including $30,367 of accrued interest in satisfaction of all amounts owed under the Accounts Payable Agreement.

On June 4, 2012 (the “Closing Date”), 2314505 Ontario Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours (the “Purchaser”), Karen Dalicandro (“KD”), Donald Dalicandro and 2293046 Ontario Inc. (“KD Co” and together with KD, the “Vendors”) entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”).  Pursuant to the SPA, Purchaser purchased all of the issued and outstanding shares of Apex Systems Integrators Inc. (“Apex”), a corporation organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada.  In consideration for the shares of Apex, on the Closing Date, the Purchaser paid CDN$5,000,000 (“Closing Amount”), of which CDN$240,000 (the “Escrow Amount”) was placed in escrow with the Purchaser’s attorney and CDN$10,000 is held by the Purchaser as a holdback.  On the Closing Date, the Purchaser and Apex merged under the corporate name of Apex Systems Integrators Inc.. Mr. Dolicandro became a member of our board of directors on the Closing Date. Apex leases premises from an entity controlled by Don Dalicandro. Rent expense included in the consolidated financial statements was $84,000, for the year ended December 31, 2012. Additionally, at December 31, 2012 the Purchaser has a receivable of $201,908 from the Vendors in connection with the Working Capital requirement as defined in the Purchase Agreement and described in “Note 4 – Acquisitions ” in our accompanying Notes to the Form 10- K Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus.

On November 15, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Sigma Agreement”) with Sigma Opportunity Fund II, LLC (“Sigma Opportunity Fund”) and Sigma Capital Advisors, LLC (“Sigma Advisors”).

Pursuant to the Sigma Agreement, the parties agreed to amend the Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock of the Company (the “Series C Certificate of Designation”) to modify the definition of Conversion Value such that effective as of January 1, 2013, if the Series C Preferred Stock has not been redeemed as of such date, the Conversion Value will be equal to the lower of the Conversion Value then in effect or $0.61 (representing the closing price of the common stock on October 31, 2012) per share (subject to adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations and the like).
Pursuant to the Sigma Agreement, the Company paid to Sigma Advisors an administrative fee of $150,000 (which will be netted against amounts otherwise owed to Sigma Advisors by the Company in connection with any services provided or money owed to Sigma Advisors by the Company by December 31, 2012) and issued to the holders of the Series C Preferred Stock an aggregate of 175,364 shares of common stock as an antidilution adjustment.

Pursuant to the Sigma Agreement, Sigma Opportunity Fund and Sigma Advisors agreed to a standstill with respect to securities of the Company for the period from November 15, 2012 through December 31, 2012.

On October 3, 2012, the Company, Sigma Opportunity Fund II, LLC, Sigma Capital Advisors and Donald W. Rowley entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Consent and Waiver Agreement dated as of June 4, 2012 (“Consent and Waiver Amendment”).

Pursuant to the Consent and Waiver Amendment, the parties agreed to amend the Certificate of Designations of the Powers, Preferences, and Relative Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights of Preferred Stock and Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions thereof of Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock of the Company which was filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on July 1, 2011 (“Certificate of Designations”) to increase the Dividend Rate (as defined therein) to 20% on the Stated Value (as defined therein) for each dividend period beginning June 4, 2012.  The parties also agreed to amend the Certificate of Designations to modify the definition of Breach Event.

Pursuant to the Consent and Waiver Amendment, the parties agreed that if the Company does not redeem on a pro rata basis for cash at least $2,206,000, in Stated Value (as defined in the Certificate of Designations) of the Series C Preferred Stock on or before October 31, 2012, then the parties will negotiate in good faith until November 15, 2012, relating to changes to the Certificate of Designations and other related matters that the parties may wish to agree upon in order to protect the interests of the Series C Preferred Stock and the Company will file the amended Certificate of Designations within two weeks thereafter.  If the Company and a majority in interest of the Series C Preferred Stock are unable to agree upon revised terms by November 15, 2012, the Company will file an amendment to the Certificate of Designations no later than November 15, 2012, to provide that the Conversion Value (as defined in the Certificate of Designations) will be equal to the lower of (i) the Conversion Value then in effect, (ii) $1.20 per share or (iii) the closing price of the Company’s common stock on October 31, 2012 (in each case subject to the continuing antidilution provisions contained in the Certificate of Designations).

Pursuant to the Consent and Waiver Amendment, the Company also agreed to issue an aggregate of 175,364 shares of its common stock to the holders of the Series C Preferred Stock on November 15, 2012.

On December 20, 2012, all outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock were redeemed by the Company for an aggregate redemption price (including accrued dividends) of $4,732,567.
Director Independence
The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Rifkin, Sheehy, Chaiken, Ferland and Yelin are each independent directors.


The following table sets forth certain information regarding our common stock, beneficially owned as of the date of this prospectus, by (i) each person known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock, (ii) each executive officer and director, and (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group.  We calculated beneficial ownership according to Rule 13d-3 of the Exchange Act as of that date.  Shares issuable upon exercise of options or warrants that are exercisable or convertible within 60 days after the date of this prospectus are included as beneficially owned by the holder.  Beneficial ownership generally includes voting and dispositive power with respect to securities.  Unless otherwise indicated below, the persons and entities named in the table have sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to all shares beneficially owned.  Unless otherwise noted below, the address of each person listed is care of our company at 8697 Research Drive Irvine, CA 92618.

  Common Stock  Percentage of 
Name of Beneficial Owner (1) Beneficially Owned  Common Stock (2) 
          
Named Executive Officers         
Nicholas R. Toms (*)  854,717   (3)  6.7%
Michael Roe (**)  -   (4)  - 
Ralph S. Hubregsen (**)  14,411   (5)  **** 
John E. Chis (**)  106,984   (6)  **** 
Bryan E. Moss (**)  308,913   (7)  2.5 
Don Dalicandro (***)  78,865       **** 
             
Directors            
David M. Rifkin (***)  111,881   (8)  **** 
Jay B. Sheehy (***)  41,455   (9)  **** 
Robert M. Chaiken (***)  49,203   (14)  **** 
Marc Ferland (***)  -       - 
Lawrence Yelin (***)  24,444   (10)  **** 
             
All Executive Officers and Directors as a group (11 people)  1,590,873       12.2 
             
5% Shareholders            
North Star Trust Company  1,692,753   (11)  13.9 
Macrosolve, Inc.  617,284   (12)  5.1 
Michael N. Taglich  845,758   (17)  6.9 

(*) - Executive Officer and Director of the Company
(**) - Executive Officer of the Company
(***) – Director
(****) -less than 1%.
All beneficial ownership percentages as they relate to the ESOP plan are as of December 31, 2012, the latest date of the ESOP share allocation.
(1) Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner is 8697 Research Drive, Irvine, California 92618-4204.
(2) Applicable percentage ownership is based on 12,144,096 shares of common stock outstanding as of September 18, 2013, together with securities exercisable or convertible into shares of common stock within 60 days of September 18, 2013, for each stockholder.  Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities.  Shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of September 18, 2013, are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such securities for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
(3)  Includes 56,467 shares of common stock held by the ESOP.  The shareholder beneficially owns 3.3% of the ESOP.  Of these shares, 187,961 are issuable upon the exercise of options, 66,365 are issuable upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock, 111,111 are issuable upon conversion of Series D Preferred Stock and 83,333 are issuable upon the exercise of warrants.
(4)  Reserved
(5)  Includes 3,300 shares of common stock held by the ESOP. The shareholder beneficially owns 0.2% of the ESOP. Also includes 11,111 shares of common stock underlying 1,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock.
(6)  Includes 36,845 shares of common stock held by the ESOP. The shareholder beneficially owns 2.2% of the ESOP. Also includes 59,983 shares issuable upon the exercise of options.
(7)  Includes 6,390 shares of common stock held by the ESOP. The shareholder beneficially owns 0.4% of the ESOP. Also includes 27,778 shares of common stock underlying 2,500 shares of Series D Preferred stock.
(8)  Includes 11,111 shares of common stock underlying 1,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock. Also includes 25,973 shares issuable upon the exercise of options and 48,391 shares issuable upon conversion of Series A preferred stock.
(9)  Includes 11,111 shares of common stock underlying 1,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock. Also includes 10,032 shares issuable upon the exercise of options.
(10)  Includes 24,444 shares of common stock underlying 2,200 shares of Series D Preferred Stock
(11)  North Star Trust Company, the trustee of the ESOP, is deemed to have the dispositive and voting control over the shares held by the ESOP.
(12)  The address of the shareholder is 1717 Boulder Avenue, #700, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119
(13)  Reserved
(14)  Includes 4,840 shares issuable upon the exercise of options, 11,061 shares issuable upon conversion of series A Preferred Stock, and 27,652 shares issuable upon conversion of series B Preferred Stock.
(15)  Reserved
(16)  Reserved
(17)  Includes 155,526 shares held by Michael Taglich Keogh-account, 151,343 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants and 205,556 shares issuable upon conversion of 18,500 shares of Series D Preferred Stock (including 1,500 shares held by Michael Taglich C/F Hope Taglich UGMA, 2,000 shares held by Michael Taglich Custodian FBO Stella Taglich UTMA NY Until Age 21, 2,000 shares held by Michael Taglich Custodian FBO Amanda Taglich UTMA NY Until Age 21, 3,000 shares held by Michael Taglich Custodian for Lucy Taglich UTMA NY, and 10,000 shares held by Michael Taglich POA TAG/KENT Partnership F/B/O Garlinghouse/M. Taglich B. Taglich), and 333,333 shares issuable upon conversion of 30,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock held by Michael N. Taglich Claudia Taglich JTWROS.

COMMON STOCK

The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock, each having a par value of $0.001.  The holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends if and when declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available for distribution.  Any such dividends may be paid in cash, property or shares of our common stock.  We have has not paid any dividends since our inception, and it is not likely that any dividends on our common stock will be declared in the foreseeable future.  Any dividends will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors, and will depend upon, among other things, our operating and financial condition and our capital requirements and general business conditions.
Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record. There are no cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. With respect to any matter, other than the election of directors or a matter for which the affirmative vote of the holders of a specified portion of the shares entitled to vote is required by Delaware General Corporate Law, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on that matter and represented in person or by proxy at a meeting of shareholders at which a majority is present shall be required to take action. Directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote in the election of directors at a meeting of shareholders at which a majority is present. Thus the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares of common stock can elect all of our directors if they choose to do so.
The holders of our common stock have no preemptive, subscription, conversion or redemption rights. Upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the holders of our common stock are entitled to receive our assets pro rata.

PREFERRED STOCK

The Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, each having a par value of $0.001, of which 500,000 shares are designated as Series A Preferred Stock, of which 269,608 are issued and outstanding, 500,000 shares are designated as Series B Preferred Stock, of which 131,347 are issued and outstanding, 5,000,000 shares are designated as Series C Preferred Stock, of which 0 shares are issued and outstanding and, 4,000,000 shares are designated as Series D Preferred Stock, of which 704,200 shares are issued and outstanding.

Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock

The holders of the Series A and Series B Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, when, as, and if declared by the Board of Directors, dividends at an annual rate of 8% of the stated value. The stated value of the Series A Preferred is $4.00 per share and the stated value of the Series B Preferred is $3.20 per share.  Dividends shall be cumulative and shall accrue on each share of the outstanding preferred stock from the date of its issue. The holders of the Series A and Series B Preferred Stock have no voting rights except on matters affecting their rights or preferences.

Subject to the rights of the Series D Preferred Stock, upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, the holders of the Series A (subject to the rights of the Series B Preferred) and Series B Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive an amount equal to the stated value per share of $4.00 and $3.20, respectively, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends before any payments shall be made to the holders of any common stock or hereinafter issued preferred stock.  The Series A Preferred Stock has preference over the Series B Preferred Stock in liquidation.

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $4.00 per share.  Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $3.20 per share.
Series C Preferred Stock

On December 20, 2012, all issued and outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock were redeemed using the proceeds generated from the sale of the Series D Preferred Stock.

Series D Preferred Stock

In connection with the Series D First Closing, on December 20, 2012, we filed a Certificate of Designation of Series D Preferred Stock (the “Series D Certificate of Designation”) with the Secretary of State of Delaware. Pursuant to the Series D Certificate of Designation, we designated 4,000,000 shares of our preferred stock as Series D Preferred Stock. The Series D Preferred Stock has a Stated Value of $10.00 per share, votes on an as-converted basis with the common stock, and is convertible, at the option of the holder, into such number of shares of our common stock equal to the number of shares of Series D Preferred Stock to be converted, multiplied by the Stated Value, divided by the Conversion Price in effect at the time of the conversion.  The initial Conversion Price was $1.00, subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar transactions, and in the event of subsequent equity sales at a lower price per share, subject to certain exceptions. As a result of the Private Placement completed in August 2013, the Conversion Price of the Series D Preferred Stock was reduced to $0.90. The Series D Preferred Stock entitles the holder to cumulative dividends, payable quarterly, at an annual rate of (i) 8% of the Stated Value during the three year period commencing on the date of issue, and (ii) 12% of the Stated Value commencing three years after the date of issue. We may, at our option, pay dividends in PIK Shares, in which event the applicable dividend rate will be 12% and the number of such PIK Shares issuable will be equal to the aggregate dividend payable divided by the lesser of (x) the then effective Conversion Price or (y) the average volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the five prior consecutive trading days.

Pursuant to the Series D Certificate of Designation, upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of our Company, holders of Series D Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive, for each share of Series D Preferred Stock, an amount equal to the Stated Value of $10.00 per share plus any accrued but unpaid dividends thereon before any distribution or payment may be made to the holders of any common stock, Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, or subsequently issued preferred stock.

Pursuant to the Series D Certificate of Designation, commencing on the trading day on which the closing price of the common stock is greater than $2.00 for thirty consecutive trading days with a minimum average daily trading volume of at least 5,000 shares for such period, and at any time thereafter, the Company in its sole discretion may  cause the conversion of all of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock to common stock (subject to the condition that, all of the shares issuable upon such conversion may be re-sold without limitation under an effective registration statement or pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Pursuant to the Series D Certificate of Designation, commencing two years from the termination or expiration of the offering of the Series D Preferred Stock (which termination occurred on December 31, 2012), and at any time thereafter, the Company in its sole discretion may redeem all of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $10.00 per share plus any accrued but unpaid dividends.


Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the Delaware Law, provides that a corporation may indemnify directors and officers as well as other employees and individuals against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement in connection with specified actions, suits or proceedings, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation — a “derivative action”), if they acted in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe their conduct was unlawful. A similar standard is applicable in the case of derivative actions, except that indemnification only extends to expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred in connection with defense or settlement of such action, and the statute requires court approval before there can be any indemnification where the person seeking indemnification has been found liable to the corporation. Under Section 145 of the Delaware Law, a corporation shall indemnify an agent of the corporation for expenses actually and reasonably incurred if and to the extent such person was successful on the merits in a proceeding or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein.
Section 145 of the Delaware Law authorizes a court to award, or a corporation’s board of directors to grant, indemnity to directors and officers in terms sufficiently broad to permit such indemnification under certain circumstances for liabilities (including reimbursement for expenses incurred) arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide for indemnification of our directors, officers, employees and other agents to the maximum extent permitted by the Delaware Law. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers or persons controlling our company pursuant to such provisions, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.


We are registering the shares of common stock to permit the resale of these shares of common stock by the holders thereof from time to time after the date of this prospectus.  We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale by the selling stockholders of the shares of common stock.  We will bear all fees and expenses incident to our obligation to register the shares of common stock. We have not retained any underwriter on our behalf or the behalf of the selling stockholders in connection with the offer and sale of the securities to be sold by them under this prospectus. Neither Newport Coast Securities, Inc. nor any of its associated persons are participating as a selling stockholder under this prospectus.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCBB under the symbol “DPSI”. The selling stockholders may sell all or a portion of the shares of common stock held by them and offered hereby from time to time directly or through one or more underwriters, broker-dealers or agents. If the shares of common stock are sold through underwriters or broker-dealers, the selling stockholders will be responsible for underwriting discounts or commissions or agent’s commissions. The shares of common stock may be sold in one or more transactions at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of the sale, at varying prices determined at the time of sale or at negotiated prices. These sales may be effected in transactions, which may involve crosses or block transactions, pursuant to one or more of the following methods:

on any national securities exchange or quotation service on which the securities may be listed or quoted at the time of sale;
in the over-the-counter market;
in transactions otherwise than on these exchanges or systems or in the over-the-counter market;
through the writing or settlement of options, whether such options are listed on an options exchange or otherwise;
ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;
block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;
purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;
an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
privately negotiated transactions;
settlement of short sales entered into after the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part;
in transactions through broker-dealers that agree with the Selling Stockholders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;
through the writing or settlement of options or other hedging transactions, whether through an options exchange or otherwise;
a combination of any such methods of sale; or
any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.
The selling stockholders may also sell shares under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, if available, rather than under this prospectus.
In addition, the selling stockholders may transfer the shares of common stock by other means not described in this prospectus. If the selling stockholders effect such transactions by selling shares of common stock to or through underwriters, broker-dealers or agents, such underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may receive commissions in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling stockholders or commissions from purchasers of the shares of common stock for whom they may act as agent or to whom they may sell as principal (which discounts, concessions or commissions as to particular underwriters, broker-dealers or agents may be in excess of those customary in the types of transactions involved). In connection with sales of the shares of common stock or otherwise, the selling stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers, which may in turn engage in short sales of the shares of common stock in the course of hedging in positions they assume. The selling stockholders may also sell shares of common stock short and deliver shares of common stock covered by this prospectus to close out short positions and to return borrowed shares in connection with such short sales. The selling stockholders may also loan or pledge shares of common stock to broker-dealers that in turn may sell such shares.
The selling stockholders may pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the shares of common stock owned by them and, if they default in the performance of their secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the shares of common stock from time to time pursuant to this prospectus or any amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act amending, if necessary, the list of selling stockholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling stockholders under this prospectus. The selling stockholders also may transfer and donate the shares of common stock in other circumstances in which case the transferees, donees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus.
To the extent required by the Securities Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, the selling stockholders and any broker-dealer participating in the distribution of the shares of common stock may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act, and any commission paid, or any discounts or concessions allowed to, any such broker-dealer may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. At the time a particular offering of the shares of common stock is made, a prospectus supplement, if required, will be distributed, which will set forth the aggregate amount of shares of common stock being offered and the terms of the offering, including the name or names of any broker-dealers or agents, any discounts, commissions and other terms constituting compensation from the selling stockholders and any discounts, commissions or concessions allowed or re-allowed or paid to broker-dealers.
There can be no assurance that any selling stockholder will sell any or all of the shares of common stock registered pursuant to the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part.
The selling stockholders and any other person participating in such distribution will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder, including, without limitation, to the extent applicable, Regulation M of the Exchange Act, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of any of the shares of common stock by the selling stockholders and any other participating person. To the extent applicable, Regulation M may also restrict the ability of any person engaged in the distribution of the shares of common stock to engage in market-making activities with respect to the shares of common stock. All of the foregoing may affect the marketability of the shares of common stock and the ability of any person or entity to engage in market-making activities with respect to the shares of common stock.
We will pay all expenses of the registration of the shares of common stock.
Once sold under the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part, the shares of common stock will be freely tradable in the hands of persons other than our affiliates.


This prospectus relates to the offering by the selling stockholders of up to 4,391,000 shares of common stock, including 2,927,333 outstanding shares and 1,463,667 shares issuable upon exercise of warrants. 

The following table sets forth, based on information provided to us by the selling stockholders or known to us, the name of each selling stockholder, the nature of any position, office or other material relationship, if any, which the selling stockholder has had, within the past three years, with us or with any of our predecessors or affiliates, and the number of shares of our stock beneficially owned by the stockholder before this offering. The number of shares owned are those beneficially owned, as determined under the rules of the SEC, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares of common stock as to which a person has sole or shared voting power or investment power and any shares of common stock which the person has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of any option, warrant or right, through conversion of any security or pursuant to the automatic termination of a power of attorney or revocation of a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement. None of the selling stockholders is a broker-dealer or affiliate of a broker-dealer.
We have assumed all shares of common stock reflected on the table will be sold from time to time in the offering covered by this prospectus. Because the selling stockholders may offer all or any portions of the shares of common stock listed in the table below, no estimate can be given as to the amount of those shares of common stock covered by this prospectus that will be held by the selling stockholders upon the termination of the offering.

Name of Selling Stockholder Number of Shares Beneficially Owned Prior to Offering  Number of Shares Offered  Number of Shares Beneficially Owned After Offering  Percentage of Shares Owned After the Offering 
Carolina Abenante  250,000   250,000(1)  0   0 
Graham Mosley  262,500   262,500(2)  0   0 
Lance Siegall  30,000   30,000(3)  0   0 
David J. Kass  500,000   500,000(4)  0   0 
Mark Grinbaum  187,500   187,500(5)  0   0 
Shadow Capital LLC (6)  375,000   375,000(7)  0   0 
Joseph E. Heller and Christine D. Heller  63,000   63,000(8)  0   0 
Stuart Edward Meltzer Trust  500,000   500,000(23)  0   0 
Eugene F. Ingles  62,500   62,500(9)  0   0 
Michael Leiter  30,000   30,000(3)  0   0 
Jeffrey Krueger  62,500   62,500(9)  0   0 
Richard Todd Gross  75,000   75,000(10)  0   0 
Brett Moyer  125,000   125,000(11)  0   0 
Will O. Wild  30,000   30,000(3)  0   0 
Michael DePompeo  25,500   25,500(12)  0   0 
Bruce Forer  30,000   30,000(3)  0   0 
Irwin Zalcberg  62,499   62,499(13)  0   0 
Delaware Charter Guarantee & Trust Company FBO Boyko Dodov  132,000   132,000(14)  0   0 
Delaware Charter Guarantee & Trust Company FBO John Dempsey  25,500   25,500(12)        
Option Opportunities Corp (15)  62,500   62,500(9)  0   0 
Warberg Opportunistic Trading Fund LP (15)  125,000   125,000(11)  0   0 
Serenity Now LLC (15)  62,501   62,501(16)  0   0 
Evelyn Kossak  125,000   125,000(11)  0   0 
Raymond Smullyan  249,999   249,999(17)  0   0 
Jerry Lukasik  62,500   62,500(9)  0   0 
Cranshire Capital Master Fund, Ltd. (18)  125,001   125,001(19)  0   0 
Alpha Capital Anstalt (20)  250,000   250,000(1)  0   0 
FireRock Global Opportunities Fund, L.P. (21)  125,000   125,000(11)  0   0 
Jeffrey Freedman  215,000   125,000(11)  90,000   * 
Nicholas Toms (22)  854,717   250,000(1)  604,717   4.3 

* Less than 1%
(1) Includes 166,667 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 83,333 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(2) Includes 175,000 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 87,500 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(3) Includes 20,000 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 10,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(4) Includes 333,333 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 166,667 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(5) Includes 125,000 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 62,500 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(6) B. Kent Garlinghouse has voting and dispositive powers over the securities.
(7) Includes 250,000 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 125,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(8) Includes 42,000 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 21,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(9) Includes 41,667 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 20,833 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(10) Includes 50,000 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 25,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(11) Includes 83,333 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 41,667 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(12) Includes 17,000 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 8,500 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(13) Includes 41,666 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 20,833 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(14) Includes 88,000 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 44,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(15) Daniel Warsh has voting and dispositive powers over the securities.
(16) Includes 41,667 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 20,834 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(17) Includes 166,666 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 83,333 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(18) Keith A. Goodman has voting and dispositive powers over the securities.
(19) Includes 83,334 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 41,667 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.
(20) Konrad Ackermann has voting and dispositive powers over the securities.
(21) Seth Fireman has voting and dispositive powers over the securities.
(22) Nicholas Toms is the Company’s chief executive officer.
(23) Includes 333,333 Common Shares sold in the Private Placement and 166,667 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Investor Warrants sold in the Private Placement.




The validity of the shares of common stock offered hereby will be passed upon for us by Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP, New York, New York.
The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2012 included in this Prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of BDO USA, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

The combined financial statements of APEX Systems Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems Integrators (USA) Inc. as of July 31, 2011 and 2010 and for each of the two years in the period ended July 31, 2011 included in this prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of Grant Thornton LLP, independent chartered accountants, appearing elsewhere herein, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

We file annual reports, quarterly reports, current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read or obtain a copy of these reports at the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549, on official business days during the hours of 10:00 am to 3:00 pm. You may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room and its copy charges by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a website that contains registration statements, reports, proxy information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC. The address of the website is www.sec.gov.

We have filed with the SEC a Registration Statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of common stock being offered by this prospectus. This prospectus is part of that registration statement. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement or the exhibits to the registration statement. For further information with respect to us and the shares offered by the selling stockholders pursuant to this prospectus, you should refer to the registration statement and its exhibits. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract, agreement or other document referred to are not necessarily complete, and you should refer to the copy of that contract or other documents filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. You may read or obtain a copy of the registration statement at the SEC’s public reference room and website referred to above.
59

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.

Interim Financial Statements of Apex Systems Integrators, Inc. (Unaudited)
Audited Combined Financial Statements of Apex Systems Integrators, Inc. and Apex Integrators (USA) Inc.

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
  June 30,  December 31, 
  2013  2012 
ASSETS      
Current assets      
Cash $266  $1,103 
Accounts receivable, net  9,367   12,287 
Due from related party  191   202 
Inventory, net  850   811 
Deferred costs  4,020   3,955 
Deferred tax assets  46   48 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  674   302 
Total current assets  15,414   18,708 
         
Property and equipment, net  143   179 
Other assets, net  158   205 
Deferred costs, net of current portion  1,988   2,124 
Goodwill  8,434   8,571 
Intangible assets, net  4,880   6,023 
Total assets $31,017  $35,810 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Current liabilities        
Accounts payable $10,814  $11,080 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  2,899   2,895 
Lines of credit  2,724   3,430 
Current portion of debt  3,973   1,800 
Due to related parties  95   1 
Accrued earn out consideration  1,129   1,186 
Unearned revenue  7,346   7,409 
Total current liabilities  28,980   27,801 
         
Long term liabilities        
Unearned revenue, net of current portion  2,684   2,883 
Debt, net of current portion and discount  550   2,922 
Accrued earn out consideration, net of current portion  151   159 
Deferred tax liabilities  1,022   1,078 
Other long term liabilities  80   80 
Total liabilities  33,467   34,923 
         
Commitments and contingencies and subsequent event  -   - 
         
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
Cumulative Convertible Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares     
authorized, 1,105,155 and 1,105,155 shares issued and outstanding, including     
cumulative and imputed preferred dividends of $505 and $361, and     
with a liquidation preference of $8,902 and $8,758 at June 30, 2013     
and December 31, 2012, respectively  7,528   7,370 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized,        
9,370,646 issued and 9,216,763 outstanding as of June 30, 2013,        
and 9,300,439 issued and 9,146,556 outstanding as of December 31, 2012  9   9 
Additional paid-in capital  16,224   16,132 
Treasury stock, 153,883 shares of common stock  (205)  (205)
Accumulated deficit  (25,330)  (21,674)
Unearned ESOP shares  (698)  (767)
Accumulated other comprehensive income  22   22 
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)  (2,450)  887 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $31,017  $35,810 
         
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
(In thousands, except share and per share data)

  Three Months Ended June 30,  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2013  2012  2013  2012 
             
Net sales $14,721  $17,767  $28,493  $35,577 
                 
Cost of sales  11,155   14,048   22,103   28,114 
                 
Gross profit  3,566   3,719   6,390   7,463 
                 
Selling, general and administrative expense  4,464   4,802   9,496   8,629 
                 
Operating loss  (898)  (1,083)  (3,106)  (1,166)
                 
Other expense:                
Interest expense  256   207   483   348 
Other income, net  (8)  (32)  (14)  (61)
Total other expense  248   175   469   287 
                 
Net loss before income taxes  (1,146)  (1,258)  (3,575)  (1,453)
                 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (30)  26   (357)  68 
                 
Net loss  (1,116)  (1,284)  (3,218)  (1,521)
                 
Cumulative and imputed preferred stock dividends  (218)  (239)  (438)  (461)
                 
Net loss attributable to common shareholders $(1,334) $(1,523) $(3,656) $(1,982)
                 
Net loss per share -                
Basic and diluted $(0.15) $(0.20) $(0.42) $(0.27)
                 
Weighted average shares outstanding -                
Basic and diluted  8,698,626   7,512,969   8,659,931   7,452,705 
                 
                 
                 
Comprehensive loss $(1,113) $(1,279) $(3,217) $(1,516)
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
(In thousands)

  Six Months ended June 30, 
  2013  2012 
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net loss $(3,218) $(1,521)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash        
provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  995   417 
Amortization of deferred financing costs and note discount  106   58 
Employee stock-based compensation  9   39 
Non-employee stock-based compensation  -   341 
Non cash interest income  -   (24)
ESOP compensation expense  69   66 
Deferred taxes, net  -   9 
Allowance for doubtful accounts  42   41 
Loss on disposal of property and equipment  4   - 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  2,850   2,004 
Due from related party  -   (429)
Inventory, net  (40)  (1,456)
Deferred costs  71   (628)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (318)  125 
Other assets, net  4   (29)
Accounts payable  (169)  1,376 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  (19)  (13)
Due to related parties  -   117 
Unearned revenue  (229)  1,137 
Net cash provided by operating activities  157   1,630 
         
Cash flows from investing activities        
Cash paid for acquisitions  -   (4,801)
Purchases of property and equipment  (11)  (20)
Net cash used in investing activities  (11)  (4,821)
         
Cash flows from financing activities        
(Repayments) borrowings from lines of credit, net  (700)  (1,069)
Proceeds from issuance of term debt  1,000   4,033 
Cash received in reverse recapitalization, net of expenses  -   1,500 
Repayment of debt  (1,018)  (500)
Paid financing costs  (119)  (289)
Dividends paid  (154)  (321)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (991)  3,354 
Effect on cash of foreign currency translation  8   (31)
Net (decrease) increase in cash  (837)  132 
Cash at beginning of period  1,103   366 
Cash at end of period $266  $498 
         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:        
Interest paid $502  $290 
Income taxes paid  33   56 
         
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities:        
Accrued and imputed dividends on preferred stock $438  $234 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

Description of Business
DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. (“DecisionPoint”, “Company”), through its subsidiaries is a provider of Enterprise Mobility Systems.  Enterprise Mobility Solutions are those computer systems that give an enterprise the ability to connect to people, control assets, and transact business from any location by using mobile computers, tablet computers, and smartphones to securely connect the mobile worker to the back office software systems that run the enterprise. Technologies that support Enterprise Mobility Solutions include national wireless carrier networks, Wi-Fi, local area networks, mobile computers, smartphones and tablets, mobile software applications, middleware and device security and management software.  The Company also provides professional services, proprietary and third party software and software customization as an integral part of its customized solutions for its customers.    The proprietary suite of software products utilizes the latest technologies to empower the mobile worker in many areas including merchandising, sales and delivery; field service; logistics and transportation; and warehouse management.

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION, LIQUIDITY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements.  The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual consolidated financial statements.  In the opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all of the adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and adjustments) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The interim results for the periods ended June 30, 2013, are not necessarily indicative of results for the full 2013 fiscal year or any other future interim periods.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, DecisionPoint Systems International and Apex Systems Integrators, Inc. (“Apex”).  DecisionPoint Systems International has two wholly-owned subsidiaries, DecisionPoint Systems Group, Inc. (“DPS Group”) and CMAC, Inc. (“CMAC”).  Apex was acquired on June 4, 2012, and as such, the operating results of Apex have been consolidated into the Company’s consolidated results of operations beginning on June 5, 2012.  In addition, on July 31, 2012, the Company consummated an asset purchase agreement (“Asset Purchase Agreement”) with MacroSolve, Inc.  Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company purchased the business (including substantially all the related assets) of the seller’s Illume Mobile division (“Illume Mobile”) and is a division of the Company.  The Company currently operates in one business segment.
The preparation of unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the recorded amounts reported therein.  Certain accounting policies involve judgments and uncertainties to such an extent that there is reasonable likelihood that materially different amounts could have been reported under different conditions, or if different assumptions had been used.  The Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions on a regular basis.  The Company uses historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances to form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.  Actual results may differ materially from these estimates and assumptions used in preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2013.
Liquidity
In the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company experienced a decrease in revenue of $3.0 million compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2012, and a $1.0 million increase in revenue compared to the previous sequential quarter ended March 31, 2013.  In the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company incurred approximately $0.9 million in increased expenses due to professional fees relating to the capital raising activities, the registration of common shares as a result of the Series D Preferred Stock offering and associated audit fees, and other matters such as employee termination costs. The Company experienced a net loss of $1.3 million and $3.7 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013, which were far in excess of the internal forecast maintained by the management team. In addition, the Company has a substantial working capital deficit totaling $(13.6) million at June 30, 2013.  Although a portion of this deficit is associated with deferred costs and unearned revenues and term debt that has been classified current due to expected future covenant violations (see further discussion at Note 7), the liabilities of the Company that are expected to be satisfied in the foreseeable future in cash far exceed the operating assets that are expected to be satisfied in cash. As a result, the availability under the Company’s credit line has contracted significantly and the Company’s overall liquidity has become significantly constrained.
To address these matters, the Company has embarked on a comprehensive review of its operations, which is expected to significantly reduce non-essential expenses and complete the integration of the Company’s acquisitions of Apex and Illume Mobile, which is expected to result in further cost savings.
On August 15, 2013, the Company entered into definitive subscription agreements with accredited investors for the sales of $1,756,400 in gross proceeds (including $200,000 from management and existing shareholders of the Company) for 2,927,333 shares of common stock.  The effective price of the offering was $0.60 per share of common stock. An initial closing for $1,556,400 was held on August 15, 2013.  The remaining $200,000 is expected to close shortly thereafter.  Additionally 1,463,667 warrants were issued at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, which are expected to receive liability accounting treatment under existing technical standards.  The Company received net proceeds of approximately $1.3 million from the initial closing, after deducting the placement agent’s fees of 10% and other offering expenses. (see Note 12 – Subsequent Event).
During 2012 and 2013, all principal payments on the Company’s term debt were made within payment terms. The Company was not in compliance with certain financial covenants under the agreements with Royal Bank of Canada, “RBC Credit Agreement” and BDC, Inc. “BDC Credit Agreement” as of December, 31, 2012, March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013.  The Company has received waivers for non-compliance for past covenant violations and is currently discussing resetting debt covenants with these institutions to avoid  expected future violations.  Although management of the Company believes it is improbable that RBC and/or BDC will exercise their rights up to, and including, acceleration of the outstanding debt, there can be no assurance RBC and BDC will not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the debt obligations. Accordingly, the Company has classified these debt obligations as current at June 30, 2013 (see Note 7 – Term Debt).
At July 31, 2013, the outstanding balance on the line of credit with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) is $3.1 million, down from $4.2 million at April 30, 2013, and the availability under the line of credit has increased to $2.6 million (see Note 6 – Lines of Credit).  The Company relies on the line of credit to fund daily operating activities maintaining very little cash on hand.  As of December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants with SVB. As of May 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013, the Company was not in compliance with the Tangible Net Worth financial covenant as defined in the amended SVB Loan Agreement. SVB has agreed to temporarily forbear exercising their rights and remedies under the facility until August 28, 2013 and has agreed to waive the existing covenant violations if a gross capital raise of $1.5 million is completed by such date. The Company completed the capital raise and was able to achieve compliance with the forbearance agreement prior to August 28.2013. Accordingly, the Company believes that at the time of this filing it is in compliance with the terms and provisions of its SVB lending agreements.  Except for any capital raises through August 28, 2013, the minimum Tangible Net Worth requirement of a $(9.7) million deficit will be further reduced by one half of any funds raised through sales of common stock (as only 50% of additional capital raises are given credit in the Tangible Net Worth calculation).  The Company estimates that its minimum Tangible Net Worth at July 31, 2013, giving pro forma effect for the net $1.3 million in capital raise closed to date in August, was approximately a $(9.1) million deficit, leaving approximately $0.6 million in Tangible Net Worth cushion over the requirement of the line of credit. Should the Company continue to incur losses in a manner consistent with its recent historical financial performance, the Company will violate this covenant without additional net capital raises in amounts that are approximately twice the amount of the losses incurred.
In the near term, the Company’s successful restructuring of its operations and reduction of operating costs and/or its ability to raise additional capital at acceptable terms is critical to its ability to continue to operate for the foreseeable future.  If the Company continues to incur operating losses and/or does not raise sufficient additional capital, material adverse events may occur including, but not limited to, 1) a reduction in the nature and scope of the Company’s operations, 2) the Company’s inability to fully implement its current business plan and/or 3) continued defaults under the various loan agreements.  A covenant default would give the bank the right to demand immediate payment of all outstanding amounts which the Company would not be able to repay out of normal operations.  There are no assurances that the Company will successfully implement its plans with respect to these liquidity matters.  The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not reflect any adjustment that may be required resulting from the adverse outcome relating to this uncertainty.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes to the Company's significant accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2013.  See Footnote 2 of the Company's consolidated financial statements included in the Company's 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2013, for a comprehensive description of the Company's significant accounting policies.

Concentration of Credit Risk - The Company derived approximately 11% and 15% of revenues from one customer, and 23% and 30% of revenues from the top three customers in the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Additionally there was one customer which comprised 13% of accounts receivable at June 30, 2013.  Customer mix can shift significantly from year to year, but a concentration of the business with a few large customers is typical in any given year.  A decline in revenues could occur if a customer which has been a significant factor in one financial reporting period gives significantly less business in the following period.

The Company’s contracts with these customers and other customers do not include any specific purchase requirements or other requirements outside of the normal course of business.  The majority of customer contracts are on an annual basis for service support while on a purchase order basis for hardware purchases.  Typical hardware sales are submitted on an estimated order basis with subsequent follow on orders for specific quantities.  These sales are ultimately subject to the time that the units are installed at each of the customer locations as per their requirements.  Service contracts are purchased on an annual basis generally and are the performance responsibility of the actual service provider as opposed to the Company.  Termination provisions are generally standard clauses based upon non-performance, but a customer can cancel with a certain reasonable notice period anywhere from 30 to 90 days.  General industry standards for contracts provide ordinary terms and conditions, while actual work and performance aspects are usually dictated by a Statement of Work which outlines what is being ordered, product specifications, delivery, installation and pricing.

Translation of Foreign Currencies - The Company's functional currency is the U.S. dollar.  The financial statements of the Company's foreign subsidiary is measured using the local currency, in this case the Canadian dollar (CDN$), as its functional currency and is translated to U.S. dollars for reporting purposes.  Assets and liabilities of the subsidiary are translated at exchange rates as of the balance sheet dates.  Revenues and expenses of the subsidiary are translated at the rates of exchange in effect during the year.
Comprehensive Loss - Comprehensive loss is comprised of net loss and other comprehensive loss.  The only component of comprehensive loss is the foreign currency translation adjustments, which were nominal in amount.  There was no tax effect allocated to any component of other comprehensive loss during the periods presented.
Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years to conform to current period financial statement presentation with no effect on our previously reported financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

NOTE 3 – LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding.  Diluted loss per share is computed similarly to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.  The weighted-average basic and diluted shares for each of the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 exclude approximately 0.5 million of ESOP shares that have not been committed to be released.

For periods presented in which there is a net loss, potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation of fully diluted net loss per share as their effect is anti-dilutive. All potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive due to the net loss incurred by the Company in the periods presented.

Potential dilutive securities consist of (in thousands):
  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2013  2012 
       
Convertible preferred stock - Series A  270   270 
Convertible preferred stock - Series B  131   131 
Convertible preferred stock - Series C  -   1,415 
Convertible preferred stock - Series D  7,042   - 
Warrants to purchase common stock  981   277 
Options to purchase common stock  544   702 
         
Total potentially dilutive securities  8,968   2,795 

NOTE 4 – BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

Illume Mobile

On July 31, 2012 (“Illume Closing Date”), the Company consummated an asset purchase agreement (“Asset Purchase Agreement”) with MacroSolve, Inc.  Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company purchased the business (including substantially all the related assets) of the seller’s Illume Mobile division (“Illume Mobile”), based in Tulsa, Oklahoma.  Founded in 1996, Illume Mobile is a mobile business solutions provider that serves mobile products and platforms.  Illume Mobile’s initial core business is the development and integration of business applications for mobile environments.

In consideration for the business of Illume Mobile, the Company paid $1,000,000, of which $250,000 was paid in cash and $750,000 was paid in the form of 617,284 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The Company valued the shares issued in conjunction with the acquisition at $697,531.

Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company may be required to make an additional payment (“Earn Out Payment”) to the seller of up to $500,000 of which 50% will be paid in cash, and 50% will be paid in shares of the common stock of the Company.  The value of the shares will be based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the one year anniversary of the Illume Closing Date.  The Earn Out Payment, if any, will be paid within 30 days of the one year anniversary of the Illume Closing Date. The Company accounted for the transaction using the purchase method of accounting and the operating results for Illume Mobile have been consolidated into the Company’s results of operations beginning on August 1, 2012.  At June 30, 2013 there is $107,000 accrued for the Earn Out Payment included in accrued earn out consideration in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Apex

On June 4, 2012 (“Closing Date”), pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”), the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Apex, a corporation organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada.  Apex is a provider of wireless mobile work force software solutions.  Its suite of products utilizes the latest technologies to empower the mobile worker in many areas including merchandising, sales and delivery; field service; logistics and transportation; and, warehouse management.  Its clients are North American companies that are household names whose products and services are used daily to feed, transport, entertain and care for people throughout the world.
In consideration for the shares of Apex, the Company paid CDN$5,000,000 (US$4,801,000 at the Closing Date) (“Closing Amount”) in cash.  The Company may be required to pay up to an undiscounted amount of CDN$3,500,000 (US$3,360,700 at the Closing Date) in consideration for Apex achieving certain levels of adjusted earnings before interest, depreciation, taxes and amortization (“EBITDA”), as defined by the Purchase Agreement, in the period ended July 2013.  The fair value of the earn out was calculated to be approximately CDN$1,076,000 (US$1,033,000 at the Closing Date).  At June 30, 2013, there is CDN$1,076,000 (US$1,022,000) recorded as potential additional purchase consideration in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.  The Company accounted for the transaction using the purchase method of accounting and the operating results for Apex have been consolidated into the Company’s results of operations beginning on June 5, 2012. The Company funded the purchase of Apex through borrowings as further explained below.
As part of the Purchase Agreement, the Company is obligated to pay bonus consideration to the CEO of Apex. Such bonus is considered additional contingent purchase consideration as the Company is obligated to pay the bonus regardless of whether or not the CEO’s employment is retained.  The fair value of the bonus was calculated to be approximately CDN$160,000 (US$153,000 at the Closing Date).  At June 30, 2013 there is CDN$160,000 (US$151,000) recorded in accrued earn out consideration in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Pro Forma Financial Information (unaudited):
The following summarizes the Company’s unaudited consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 as if the Apex and Illume Mobile acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2012: (in thousands except per share data):
  Three Months Ended June 30, 2012  Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 
  As Reported  Pro Forma  As Reported  Pro Forma 
             
Net sales $17,767  $18,497  $35,577  $37,677 
Net loss attributable to common shareholders  (1,523)  (2,325)  (1,982)  (3,866)
                 
Net loss per share - basic and diluted  (0.20)  (0.27)  (0.27)  (0.46)
Included in the pro forma combined results of operations are the following adjustments for Apex: (i) amortization of intangible assets for the three and six months June 30, 2012 of $229,000 and $572,000, respectively (ii) a net increase in interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 of $116,000 and $291,000, respectively.

Included in the pro forma combined results of operations are the following adjustments for Illume Mobile: (i) amortization of intangible assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 of $53,000 and $106,000, respectively.  Net loss per share assumes the 325,000 shares issued in connection with the Apex acquisition and the 617,284 shares issued in connection with the Illume Mobile acquisition are outstanding for the period presented.
The historical financial information of Apex has been extracted for the periods required from the historical financial statements of Apex Systems Integrators, Inc. which were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  The historical financial information of Illume Mobile has been derived from using internally generated management reports for the periods required.
The unaudited pro forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of the Company’s consolidated results of operations that would have been reported had the Apex and Illume Mobile acquisitions been completed as of the beginning of the period presented, nor should it be taken as indicative of the Company’s future consolidated results of operations.
The combined amounts of Apex and Illume Mobile’s revenue and net loss since the respective acquisition dates included in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 were $1.2 million, ($0.5) million and $1.9 million, ($1.2) million, respectively, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 were $0.2 million and $0.5, respectively.
NOTE 5 – GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following summarizes the transactions affecting goodwill through June 30, 2013 (in thousands):

Balance at December 31, 2012 $8,571 
     
Effect of currency translation on Apex  (137)
Balance at June 30, 2013 $8,434 

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company’s intangible assets and accumulated amortization consist of the following (in thousands):

  June 30, 2013  December 31, 2012 
     Accumulated        Accumulated    
  Gross  Amortization  Net  Gross  Amortization  Net 
                   
Customer relationships $3,288  $(1,307) $1,981  $3,373  $(966) $2,407 
Contractor and resume databases  675   (338)  337   675   (270)  405 
Tradename  870   (278)  592   893   (193)  700 
Internal use software  2,840   (919)  1,921   2,978   (545)  2,433 
Covenant not to compete  104   (55)  49   105   (27)  78 
                         
  $7,777  $(2,897) $4,880  $8,024  $(2,001) $6,023 
The effect of foreign currency translation on the goodwill and intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2013 is approximately ($137,000)  and ($186,000).

NOTE 6 – LINES OF CREDIT
The Company has a $10.0 million revolving line of credit with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) which provides for borrowings based upon eligible accounts receivable, as defined in the Loan Agreement (“SVB Loan Agreement”).  Under the SVB Loan Agreement as amended, SVB has also provided the Company with a term loan as discussed at Note 7.  The SVB Loan Agreement is secured by substantially all the assets of the Company and matures in February 2015.  As of June 30, 2013, the outstanding balance on the line of credit is approximately $2.6 million and the interest rate is 7.0%.  The line of credit has a certain financial covenant and other non-financial covenants.  As of December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants with SVB. As of May 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013, the Company was not incompliance with the Tangible Net Worth covenant as defined in the amended SVB Loan Agreement. On August 16, 2013, the Company and SVB signed an agreement (“Forbearance Agreement”) where SVB has agreed to temporarily forbear from exercising their rights and remedies under the facility until August 28, 2013 and has agreed to waive the existing covenant violations if a gross capital raise of $1.5 million is completed by such date.  The Company completed the capital raise and was able to achieve compliance with the forbearance agreement prior to August 28, 2013. Accordingly, the Company believes that at the time of this filing it is in compliance with the terms and provisions of its SVB lending agreements.  Except for any capital raises through August 28, 2013, the minimum Tangible Net Worth requirement of a $(9.7) million deficit will be further reduced by one half of any funds raised through sales of common stock (as only 50% of additional capital raises are given credit in the Tangible Net Worth calculation).  The Company estimates that its minimum Tangible Net Worth at July 31, 2013, giving pro forma effect for the net $1.3 million in capital raise closed to date in August, was approximately a $(9.1) million deficit, leaving approximately $0.6 million in Tangible Net Worth cushion over the requirement of the line of credit. Should the Company continue to incur losses in a manner consistent with its recent historical financial performance, the Company will violate this covenant without additional net capital raises in amounts that are approximately twice the amount of the losses incurred.
Availability under the line of credit was approximately $2.9 million as of June 30, 2013 and $2.6 million as of July 31, 2013.  The line of credit allows the Company to cause the issuance of letters of credit on account of the Company to a maximum of the borrowing base as defined in the Loan Agreement.  No letters of credit were outstanding as of June 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

On February 27, 2013, the SVB Loan Agreement was amended to provide for 1) an extension of the termination date of the line of credit to February 28, 2015, 2) the modification of the line of credit borrowing base, advance rate and financial covenants, 3) the inclusion of an additional $1.0 million term loan (See further discussion at Note 7), 4) a modification of the rate of interest of the line of credit to 3.75% above SVB’s prime rate and 5) other various terms and provisions.

The Company is party to a credit agreement, dated June 4, 2012 (the “RBC Credit Agreement”) with Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”).  Under the RBC Credit Agreement, the revolving demand facility allows for borrowings up to CDN$200,000 based upon eligible accounts receivable.  Interest is based on the Royal Bank Prime (“RBP”) plus 1.5% and is payable on demand.  As of June 30, 2013, the outstanding balance on the line of credit was $142,000 and the interest rate is 4.5%.  The RBC Credit Agreement is secured by the assets of Apex.  The revolving demand facility has certain financial covenants and other non-financial covenants.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Apex was not in compliance with the Fixed Charge Coverage ratio covenant as defined in the RBC Credit Agreement.  At June 30, 2013, Apex was not in compliance with the Maximum Funded Debt to EBITDA ratio covenant as defined in the RBC Credit Agreement.  In March 2013 and May 2013, the Company received waivers for non-compliance of these covenants at December 31, 2012, March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013.  The covenants were reset by RBC on August 16, 2013.  The Company does not believe that it will be in compliance with the reset covenants at December 31, 2013.  See further discussion regarding this condition at Note 7.
For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s interest expense for the lines of credit, including amortization of deferred financing costs, was approximately $171,000 and $141,000, respectively.

RBC and SVB are party to a subordination agreement, pursuant to which RBC agreed to subordinate any security interest in assets of the Company granted in connection with the RBC Credit Agreement to SVB’s security interest in assets of the Company.

Under the RBC Credit Agreement, the lender provided Apex with a term loan as discussed at Note 7.
NOTE 7 – TERM DEBT
Term debt as of June 30, 2013, consists of the following (in thousands):

  
Balance
December 31, 2012
  Additions  Payments  Amortization of Note Discount  
Effect of
Currency
Translation
  
Balance
June 30,
2013
 
RBC term loan $2,090  $-  $(407) $-  $(100) $1,583 
Note discount  (38)  -       13  $2   (23)
BDC term loan  1,705   -   -   -   (90)  1,615 
Note discount  (31)  -       4   2   (25)
SVB term loan  1,000   -   (500)  -   -   500 
Note discount  (4)  -   -   4   -   - 
SVB term loan-2  -   1,000   (111)  -   -   889 
Note discount  -   (19)  -   3   -   (16)
                         
Total debt $4,722  $981  $(1,018) $24  $(186) $4,523 
                         
Less contractual current portion                      (1,591)
Less long term debt classified as current                      (2,382)
Debt, net of current portion                  $550 

RBC Term Loan -- On June 4, 2012, Apex entered into the RBC Credit Agreement with RBC pursuant to which RBC made available certain credit facilities in the aggregate amount of up to CDN$2,750,000, including a term facility (“RBC Term Loan”) in the amount of CDN $2,500,000 (US$2,401,000 at the Closing Date). The RBC Term Loan accrues interest at Royal Bank Prime (“RBP”) plus 4% (7% at December 31, 2012). Principal and interest is payable over a three year period at a fixed principal amount of CDN $70,000 a month beginning in July 2012 and continuing through June 2015. Apex paid approximately $120,000 in financing costs, which has been recorded as deferred financing costs or note discount in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2013, and is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the loan.
In addition, the RBC Term Loan calls for mandatory repayments based on 20% of Apex’s free cash flow as defined in the RBC Credit Agreement, before discretionary bonuses based on the annual year end audited financial statements of Apex, beginning with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, and payable within 30 days of the delivery of the annual audited financial statements, and continuing every six months through December 31, 2014. This amount is estimated to be $0 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
The RBC Term Loan has certain financial covenants and other non-financial covenants. As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Apex was not in compliance with the Fixed Charge Coverage ratio covenant as defined in the RBC Credit Agreement.  At June 30, 2013, Apex was not in compliance with the Maximum Funded Debt to EBITDA ratio covenant as defined in the RBC Credit Agreement.  In March 2013, May 2013 and August 2013, the Company received waivers for non-compliance of these covenants at December 31, 2012, March 31, 2013 and  June 30, 2013. The covenants were reset by RBC on August 16, 2013.  The Company does not believe that it will be in compliance with the reset covenants at December 31, 2013. The Company is currently further discussing adjusting the reset debt covenants with RBC.  Although the Company believes it is improbable RBC will exercise their rights up to, and including, acceleration of the outstanding debt, there can be no assurance that RBC will not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the debt obligation.  Accordingly, the Company has classified the term debt obligation as current at June 30, 2013.
F-10

BDC Term Loan -- On June 4, 2012, Apex also entered into a loan agreement (the “BDC Loan Agreement”) with BDC Capital, Inc. (“BDC”), pursuant to which BDC made available to Apex a term credit facility (“BDC Term Loan”) in the aggregate amount of CDN $1,700,000 (USD $1,632,000 at the Closing Date). The BDC Term Loan accrues interest at the rate of 12% per annum, and matures on June 23, 2016, with an available one year extension for a fee of 2%, payable at the time of extension. In addition to the interest payable, consecutive quarterly payments of CDN$20,000 as additional interest are due beginning on June 23, 2012, and subject to compliance with bank covenants, Apex will make a mandatory annual principal payment in the form of a cash flow sweep which will be equal to 50% of the Excess Available Funds (as defined by the BDC Loan Agreement) before discretionary bonuses based on the annual year end audited financial statements of Apex. The maximum annual cash flow sweep in any year will be CDN$425,000. As of December 31, 2012 and at June 30, 2013, the Company estimates that the cash sweep will be approximately $0. Such payments will be applied to reduce the outstanding principal payment due on the maturity date. In the event that Apex’s annual audited financial statements are not received within 120 days of its fiscal year end, the full CDN$425,000 becomes due and payable on the next payment date. Apex paid approximately $70,000 in financing costs which has been recorded as deferred financing costs in the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2013, and is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the loan.

The terms of the BDC loan agreement also provide for a fee to BDC in the event of the occurrence of any of the following:

(a)  if 50% or more of any company comprising Apex or the Company (consolidated assets or shares) is sold or merged with an unrelated entity; or

(b)  if there is a change of control of Apex and/or the Company prior to the Maturity Date or any extended maturity date of the BDC Tern Loan,

In the event of (a) or (b) above, Apex will pay to BDC a bonus in an amount equal to 2% of the aggregate value of Apex and the Company determined as at the closing date of such transaction, which bonus shall become due and payable at the time of the closing of such transaction. Notwithstanding any prepayment of the BDC Term Loan, the bonus and Apex’s obligation to pay same to the BDC will remain in full force and effect until the maturity date or any amended or extended maturity date agreed by the BDC such that in the event of any sale, initial public offering or similar transaction, Apex’s obligation to pay the bonus amount to the BDC will survive such prepayment.
The BDC Loan Agreement contains certain financial and non-financial covenants.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Apex was not in compliance with the minimum working capital financial covenant.  In March 2013 and May 2013, the Company received waivers for non-compliance of these covenants at December 31, 2012, March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013.  The Company is currently discussing resetting debt covenants with BDC.  Although the Company believes it is improbable that BDC will exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the debt obligation up to, and including, acceleration of the outstanding debt, there can be no assurance that BDC will not exercise their rights. Accordingly, the Company has classified the debt obligation as current at June 30, 2013.
In the event either or both of the RBC Loan Agreement or the BDC Loan Agreement were deemed to be in default, RBC or BDC, as applicable, could, among other things (subject to the rights of SVB as the Company’s senior lender), terminate the facilities, demand immediate repayment of any outstanding amounts, and foreclose on our assets. Any such action would require us to curtail or cease operations, as the Company does not currently have alternative sources of financing.
SVB Term Loan - On December 31, 2010, pursuant to an Assumption and Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement ("Amended SVB Loan Agreement"), the Company borrowed $3.0 million (the “SVB Term Loan”) from Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”). The SVB Term Loan was due in 36 equal monthly installments of principal plus interest beginning on February 1, 2011. The SVB Term Loan is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company except for the assets of Apex.  On May 20, 2011, pursuant to a Consent and Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement (“Amendment”), the maturity date was amended to April 30, 2012, with the remaining principal due on that date to be paid as a balloon payment.  On September 27, 2011, the agreement was amended and certain covenants were replaced or modified resulting in the Company being in full compliance at September 30, 2011. The principal amount outstanding under the SVB Term Loan accrues interest at a fixed rate equal to 9% per annum. In addition, a final payment equal to 2% of the aggregate amount of the SVB Term Loan is due on the earlier of the maturity date or the date the SVB Term Loan is prepaid. This final payment of $60,000 has been recorded as a discount to the SVB Term Loan, which is being amortized to interest expense through December 2013, using the effective interest method.
The Amended SVB Loan Agreement includes various customary covenants, limitations and events of default. Financial covenants, among others, include liquidity and fixed charge coverage ratios, minimum tangible net worth requirements and limitations on indebtedness.  As of December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants with SVB. As of May 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013, the Company was not incompliance with the Tangible Net Worth covenant as defined in the Amended SVB Loan Agreement. On August 16, 2013, the Company and SVB signed an agreement (“Forbearance Agreement”) where SVB has agreed to temporarily forbear from exercising their rights and remedies under the facility until August 28, 2013 and has agreed to waive the existing covenant violations if a gross capital raise of $1.5 million is completed by such date. The Company completed the capital raise and was able to achieve compliance with the forbearance agreement prior to August 28.2013.  Accordingly, the Company believes that at the time of this filing it is in compliance with the terms and provisions of its SVB lending agreements.  See further discussion regarding this matter at Note 6.
F-11


On September 27, 2011, pursuant to a Limited Waiver and Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, the Loan Agreement was amended.

On February 27, 2013, the Company entered into an amended the Loan and Security Agreement which provided an additional term loan of $1,000,000. The new term loan is due in 36 monthly installments of principal plus accrued interest beginning on April 1, 2013. The additional term loan accrues interest at 7.5% per annum.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s interest expense on the term debt, including amortization of deferred financing costs, was approximately $301,000 and $144,000, respectively.
In the event either or both RBC Loan Agreement and/or the BDC Loan Agreement were deemed to be in default, then the Amended SVB Loan agreement would be in default, which could, among other things, terminate the facility and term loan, demand immediate repayment of any outstanding amounts, and foreclose on our assets. Any such action would require us to curtail or cease operations, as the Company does not currently have alternative sources of financing.
NOTE 8 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
The Company is authorized to issue two classes of stock designated as common stock and preferred stock.  As of June 30, 2013, the Company is authorized to issue 110,000,000 total shares of stock.  Of that amount, 100,000,000 shares are common stock, each having a par value of $0.001.  The remaining 10,000,000 shares are preferred stock, each having a par value of $0.001, of which 500,000 shares are designated as Series A Preferred Stock, of which 269,608 are issued and outstanding, 500,000 shares are designated as Series B Preferred Stock, of which 131,347 are issued and outstanding, 5,000,000 shares are designated as Series C Preferred Stock, of which 0 shares are issued and outstanding and, 4,000,000 shares are designated as Series D Preferred Stock, of which 704,200 shares are issued and outstanding.

(a) Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
A summary of preferred stock outstanding as of June 30, 2013 is as follows (in thousands, except share data):

Description   
    
Series A Preferred, $0.001 par value per share, 500,000 shares designated,   
269,608 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation preference of $975   
plus cumulative dividends of $324 $1,299 
Series B Preferred, $0.001 par value per share, 500,000 shares designated,    
131,347 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation preference of $380    
plus cumulative dividends of $78  458 
Series D Preferred, $0.001 par value per share, 4,000,000 shares designated,    
704,200 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation preference of $7,042    
(net of $1,374 in issuance costs) plus imputed dividends of $103  5,771 
     
Total convertible preferred stock $7,528 

Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock

The holders of the Series A and Series B Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, when, as, and if declared by the Board of Directors, dividends at an annual rate of 8% of the stated value. The stated value of the Series A Preferred is $4.00 per share and the stated value of the Series B Preferred is $3.20 per share. Dividends shall be cumulative and shall accrue on each share of the outstanding preferred stock from the date of its issue.

The holders of the Series A and Series B Preferred Stock have no voting rights except on matters affecting their rights or preferences. Subject to the rights of the Series D Preferred Stock, upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company, the holders of the Series A (subject to the rights of the Series B Preferred) and Series B Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive an amount equal to the stated value per share of $4.00 and $3.20, respectively, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends before any payments shall be made to the holders of any common stock or hereinafter issued preferred stock. The Series A Preferred Stock has preference over the Series B Preferred Stock in liquidation.

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $4.00 per share. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $3.20 per share.

Series C Preferred Stock

On December 20, 2012, all issued and outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock were redeemed using the proceeds generated from the sale of the Series D Preferred Stock.


F-12

Series D Preferred Stock

The Series D Preferred Stock has a Stated Value of $10.00 per share, votes on an as-converted basis with the common stock, and is convertible, at the option of the holder, into such number of shares of our common stock equal to the number of shares of Series D Preferred Stock to be converted, multiplied by the Stated Value, divided by the Conversion Price in effect at the time of the conversion. The initial Conversion Price is $1.00, subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits, stock dividends and similar transactions, and in the event of subsequent equity sales at a lower price per share, subject to certain exceptions. The Series D Preferred Stock entitles the holder to cumulative dividends, payable quarterly, at an annual rate of (i) 8% of the Stated Value during the three year period commencing on the date of issue, and (ii) 12% of the Stated Value commencing three years after the date of issue. We may, at the Company’s option, pay dividends in PIK Shares, in which event the applicable dividend rate will be 12% and the number of such PIK Shares issuable will be equal to the aggregate dividend payable divided by the lesser of (x) the then effective Conversion Price or (y) the average volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the five prior consecutive trading days.  On July 16, 2013, the Company paid a cash dividend of $140,454 on the Series D preferred Stock for the period from April 1, 2013 to June 30, 2013.

Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of our Company, holders of Series D Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive, for each share of Series D Preferred Stock, an amount equal to the Stated Value of $10.00 per share plus any accrued but unpaid dividends thereon before any distribution or payment may be made to the holders of any common stock, Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, or subsequently issued preferred stock.

In addition, commencing on the trading day on which the closing price of the common stock is greater than $2.00 for thirty consecutive trading days with a minimum average daily trading volume of at least 5,000 shares for such period, and at any time thereafter, the Company may, in its sole discretion, effect the conversion of all of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock to common stock (subject to the condition that, all of the shares issuable upon such conversion may be re-sold without limitation under an effective registration statement or pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act).

The Series D Preferred Stock also contains registration rights which compel the Company to file a registration statement with the SEC within 60 days of the final closing date (December 31, 2012), and requires the registration statement to become effective within 90 days thereafter.  The initial registration statement was filed on February 12, 2013.  If the registration statement is not declared effective by May 12, 2013, a partial liquidated damage equal to 0.1% of the purchase price paid by each investor shall be payable on each monthly anniversary until the registration statement becomes effective.  In no event shall the partial liquidated damage exceed 0.6% of the purchase price paid by each investor. As of June 30, 2013, the Company accrued partial liquidated damages of $11,000; total liquidated damages were $18,000.  On July 30, 2013, the registration statement was declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Pursuant to the Series D Certificate of Designation, commencing two years from the termination or expiration of the offering of the Series D Preferred Stock (which termination occurred on December 31, 2012), and at any time thereafter, the Company in its sole discretion may redeem all of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $10.00 per share plus any accrued but unpaid dividends.

 (b) Common Stock
For the six months ended June 30, 2013

On April 26, 2013, the Company issued 70,207 shares of its common stock to 3 employees as part of a specified portion of their regular annual cash bonus.

For the year ended December 31, 2012

On June 4, 2012, the Company issued 325,000 shares of its common stock as consideration for acquisition related expenses in conjunction with the Apex transaction. The shares were valued at $341,000 and were recorded as part of selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2012. (Note 4)

On July 31, 2012, pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement with MacroSolve, the Company issued 617,284 shares of its common stock to purchase the business of Illume Mobile, a division of MacroSolve. The shares were valued at $698,000 and were recorded as part of the purchase price. (Note 4)

On November 15, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Sigma Agreement”) with Sigma Opportunity Fund II, LLC (“Sigma Opportunity Fund”) and Sigma Capital Advisors, LLC (“Sigma Advisors”).  Pursuant to the Sigma Agreement, the Company issued to the holders of the Series C Preferred Stock an aggregate of 175,364 shares of common stock as an anti-dilution adjustment.

F-13

(c) Warrants

The following table summarizes information about the Company’s outstanding common stock warrants as of June 30, 2013:
       Total    Weighted
       Warrants  Total Average
 Date Strike  Outstanding  Exercise Exercise
 IssuedExpiration Price  and Exercisable  Price Price
             
Senior Subordinated NotesDec-09Dec-14 $3.62   138,260  $500,000  
Senior Subordinated NotesDec-09Dec-14  4.34   138,260   600,000  
Placement Agent Preferred Stock - Class DDec-12Dec-17  1.10   704,200   774,620  
                
         980,720  $1,874,620  $        1.91

NOTE 9 – ESOP PLAN

The Company has an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”) which covers all non-union employees.  The Company’s contribution expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013, was $89,000 representing approximately $69,000 for the ESOP principal payment and $20,000 for the ESOP interest.  ESOP shares are allocated to individual employee accounts as the loan obligation of the ESOP to the Company is reduced.  These amounts were previously calculated on an annual basis by an outside, independent financial advisor.   Compensation costs relating to shares released are based on the fair value of shares at the time they are committed to be released.  The unreleased shares are not considered outstanding in the computation of earnings per common share.  ESOP compensation expense consisting of both cash contributions and shares committed to be released for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was approximately $58,000.  The fair value of the shares was $1.04 per share, based on the average of the daily market closing share price.
NOTE 10 - STOCK OPTION PLAN
In December 2010, the Company established the 2010 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”).  The Plan authorizes the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company assumed all of Old DecisionPoint’s obligations under their outstanding stock option plans.

The Plan is administered by the Board of Directors, or a committee appointed by the Board of Directors, which determines recipients and types of awards to be granted, including the number of shares subject to the awards, the exercise price and the vesting schedule.  The term of stock options granted under the Plans cannot exceed ten years.  Options shall not have an exercise price less than 100% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date, and generally vest over a period of five years.  If the individual possesses more than 10% of the combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company, the exercise price shall not be less than 110% of the fair market of a share of common stock on the date of grant.
A summary

Registration Rights

In connection with a private placement conducted in 2016, and also in connection with two separate private placements conducted by the Company in 2018, the Company agreed to provide the investors piggyback registration rights. Subject to certain exceptions, limitations and requirements, if the Company proposes to register shares of its common stock under the Securities Act, it agreed to provide investors in those offerings the opportunity to have the shares of Company common stock purchased in the applicable offering the opportunity to be included in that registration statement.

In addition, in connection with the private placement of convertible promissory notes conducted in 2016, commencing on the third anniversary date of that offering investors holding a majority of the statusshares of our Common Stock acquired upon conversion of the Planspromissory notes are entitled to one demand right for the registration on Form S-1 of all of the shares of Common Stock acquired upon conversion of those promissory notes. The registration rights are subject to certain limitations and requirements. To date, no stockholders have exercised any this demand registration right.

Listing

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Pink Market under the symbol “DPSI.” Previously, the Company’s common stock was quoted on the OTCQB, however, in January 2016, we elected to file a Form 15 with the SEC and terminated the registration of our Common Stock under the Exchange Act. The Company anticipates that its Common Stock will resume being quoted on the OTCQB (or the OTCQX) and in the future may seek to list its Common Stock on a national securities exchange We cannot guarantee that our Common Stock will resume being quoted on the OTCQB (or OTCQX), or that we will eventually be successful in listing our Common Stock on a national securities exchange in any particular time frame or at all and no assurance can be given that our application will be approved.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

The transfer agent and registrar for the common stock is Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Co. whose address is 1 State Street, 30th Floor, New York, NY 10004.

20

Use of Proceeds

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of common stock by the Selling Stockholders. All of the net proceeds from the sale of our common stock will go to the selling security holders as described below in the sections entitled “Selling Security Holders” and “Plan of Distribution.” We have agreed to bear the expenses relating to the registration of the common stock for the Selling Stockholders.

DILUTION

The Shares to be sold by the Selling Stockholders is Common Stock that is currently issued and outstanding or is underlying warrants previously issued by the Company. Accordingly, there will be no additional dilution to our existing stockholders.

SELLING SECURITY HOLDERS

The Common Stock being offered for resale by the Selling Stockholders is 14,239,033 shares, consisting of shares of Common Stock issued in 2016 upon conversion of then outstanding promissory notes and preferred stock and shares issued in 2016 in satisfaction of other prior Company obligations (such as amounts then owed to affiliates and for other services rendered); shares of Common Stock issued in a private placement in June 2018; shares of Common Stock issued in a private placement in October 2018; and 700,000 shares issued to an affiliate in March 2019. In addition, the Shares include a total of 1,147,547 shares of Common Stock underlying warrants originally issued by the Company in March 2016, June 2018 and October 2018.

The following table sets forth the name of the selling security holders, the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each of the Selling Stockholders as of June 30, 2013,January 11, 2021 and the number of shares of common stock being offered by the Selling Stockholders. The shares being offered hereby are being registered to permit public secondary trading, and the Selling Stockholders may offer all or part of the shares for resale from time to time. However, the Selling Stockholders are under no obligation to sell all or any portion of such shares nor are the Selling Stockholders obligated to sell any shares immediately upon effectiveness of this prospectus. All information with respect to share ownership has been furnished by the changesSelling Stockholders.

Name of Selling Shareholder 

Shares of
Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned
Before the
Offering

(1)

  Maximum
Number of
Shares to
be Offered
  Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
After the
Offering
(2)
  Percentage of
Ownership
After the
Offering
Albert J Esposito Tuw Fbo Margaret Esposito Susan E Thorstenn Ttee  41,764   41,764      *
Aldo Kokot And Mary Kokot Jtwros  5,304   5,304      *
Alexis J Bruce  4,978   4,978      *
Allan F Shapiro  3,457   3,457      *
Allison Bibicoff  63,813   63,813      *
Allyson M Defreitas Burnett Trust Uad 05/03/94 Allyson M Defreitas Burnett & Philip L Burnett Ttees  1,381   1,381      *
Anders C Allen Residuary Trust U/A Susan M Allen Uad 4/29/08 Robert W Allen Trustee  1,170   1,170      *
Andrew K Light  286,205   286,205      *

21

Andrew M Schatz & Barbara F Wolf Jt Wros  19,701   18,557   1,144   *
Angus Bruce Lauralee Bruce Jt Wros  28,131   28,131      *
Ann B Oldfather  117,500   117,500      *
Anna Kathleen Senyard  691   691      *
Annetta M Nuttall  689   689      *
Arnold Income Fund LP  16,907   16,907      *
Arnold Ventures Fund LP  28,180   28,180      *
Arthur H Finnel Living Trust Uad 01/10/13 Arthur H Finnel & Elsa V Finnel Ttees  689   689      *
Ashok Kumar Narang  124,269   124,269      *
Austin Brown  3,457   3,457      *
Barktones LLC  416,665   416,665      *
Berit M Allen Residuary Trust U/A Susan M Allen Uad 4/29/08 Robert W Allen Trustee  1,170   1,170      *
Big Red Investments Partnership Ltd  68,324   68,324      *
Bob M Chaiken & Laurie Lavalle-Chaiken  11   11      *
Brigitte Ferrada-Stetson  53,286   53,286      *
Broms Financial LLC  49,573   49,573      *
Bruce Newell  2,763   2,763      *
Bryan E Moss  3,457   3,457      *
C Mark Casey  7,375   7,375      *
Carol Francis  1,153   1,153      *
Charles Brand & Peggy A Brand  222,832   222,832      *
Christopher C Schreiber  5,000(8)  5,000(8)     *
Cibreo LLC  20,000   20,000      *
Craig Adelman  17,032   17,032      *
David A Random  147,466   147,466      *
David Frank Rios & Margaret Jo Rios 1999 Trust Dtd 6/22/99  23,861   23,861      *
David J Larkworthy Tod  11,929   11,929      *
David J Moulder  18,790   18,790      *
David L Allen  53,040   53,040      *
David M Rifkin  3,943   3,943      *
Dawn R Hagen  5,831   5,831      *

Denis McEvoy Tod Dtd 3/19/2013 (9)

  46,305(8)  46,305(8)     *
Donald B McCulloch Trust Dtd 3/16/77 Donald B & Jacqueline M Mcculloch Co-Ttee  6,097   6,097      *
Donata Random  37,000   37,000      *
Donna Kennedy  1,153   1,153      *
Douglas A Friedrich Revocable Trust Uad 09/17/04 Douglas A Friedrich Ttee  30,000   30,000      *

Douglas E Hailey (9)

  103,525(8)  103,525(8)     *
Edward J Cook  139,996   139,996      *
Edward J Hart  13,830   13,830      *
Eugene T Szczepanski Amended & Restated Irevoc Trust Uad 5/4/04 Joseph E Szczepanski Trustee  36,827   36,827      *
Frances Deluca Revocable Living Trust Dtd 10/9/01 Fbo Ronald Deluca Robert Deluca & Antoinette Porco Ttees  7,214   7,214      *
Friedland Trust Uad 12/13/07 Stephen Freidland & Linda Friedland Ttees  13,371   13,371      *
Fuse Capital LLC  7,000   7,000      *
Gary A. Hafner And Leeann Hafner Jt Ten  4,147   4,147      *
Gary Arnold And Patricia Arnold Ten Com  49,573   49,573      *

Gary Kurnov Lauren Mazer Jt Ten (9)

  2,071   2,071      *
Gary L Gray  47   47      *
Gerald I Rosenfeld Pc Profit Sharing Trust Gerald I Rosenfeld Tr  1,381   1,381      *

22

Gilda Gaertner (9)

  9,350(8)  9,350(8)     *
Glenn R Hubbard  232,329   232,329      *
Gst Exempt Marital Trust Ua Susan M Allen Uad 4/29/08 Robert W Allen Trustee  21   21      *
H. Philip Howe Trust Uad 11/15/02 H Philip Howe Ttee  53,040   53,040      *
Harvey Bibicoff & Jacqueline Bibicoff Ttees Of The Bibicoff Family Trust Dtd  147,194   147,194      *
Heidi M Smith  24,418   24,418      *
Herb B Grimes  14,755   14,755      *
Hillson Partners LP  31,121   31,121      *
Holly Lee Loebel  1,321   1,321      *
Hope A. Taglich First Party Supplemental Needs Trust Uad 8/23/17 Michael Taglich Trustee (3), (9)  12,679   12,679      *

Howard Halpern (9)

  1,850(8)  1,850(8)     *
Howard Kalka & Susan Kalka  116,461   116,461      *
Ivanka Marie Kokot  1,381   1,381      *
Jaden James Foutch Trust Uad 10/17/08 Heather A Busby Trustee  691   691      *
James B Deutsch & Deborah M Deutsch Jtwros  16,625   16,625      *
James Besselman & Susan Besselman  1,381   1,381      *
James Desocio  14,627   14,627      *
James E Puerner  2,763   2,763      *
James Ronald Foutch Jr  691   691      *
James Tadych & Patricia Tadych Rev Tr Uad 09/23/93 James & Patricia Tadych Ttees  276,687   276,687      *
Janet Sau-Han Ho  44,220   44,220      *
Jeffrey G Hipp & Mary Ann Hipp  24,673   24,673      *
Jeffrey L Sadar  63,371   63,371      *
Jeffrey R Williams & Patricia A Williams Jtwros  1,587   1,587      *
Jennifer Dendekker  7,500(8)  7,500(8)     *
Jeremy Bond  28,000   28,000      *
Joan B Rifkin  2,938   2,938      *
John Berry Worthington & Mary Elizabeth Worthington  11,934   11,934      *
John Brannen  20,000   20,000      *
John C Guttilla & Peggy Guttilla Jtwros  30,000   30,000      *
John C Lipman  90,168   90,168      *
John H Edmondson  13,260   13,260      *
John J Resich Jr Ttee John J Resich Jr Ret Trust  38,028   38,028      *
John L Palazzola Revocable Trust Uad11/29/92 John L Palazzola Ttee  37,116   37,116      *

John Nobile Tod Dtd 3/21/06 (9)

  9,450(8)  9,450(8)     *
John R Bertsch Trust Dtd 12/4/2004 John R Bertsch Ttee  279,591   279,591      *
John R Worthington Marital Trust Uad 01/10/18 Christine H Worthington Trustee  23,868   23,868      *
John S Tschohl Tod Dtd 03/15/06  1,381   1,381      *
John W Crow  61,929   61,929      *
John W Egan & Mary Sue Egan Jt Ten  527   527      *
John Wiencek  12,250   12,250      *
Jordan R Kort  20,000   20,000      *
Joseph A Ruggiero & Joann Ruggiero Jt Ten  70,262   70,262      *
Joseph Debellis  75,000   75,000      *
Josephine Edmondson Warfield  13,260   13,260      *
Joshua M Allen Residuary Trust U/A Susan M Allen Uad 04/29/08 Robert W Allen Trustee  1,170   1,170      *

Juan V Noble (9)

  9,450(8)  9,450(8)     *
Julie M Foutch  691   691      *

23

Junge Revocable Trust Uad 12/09/91 - Jeffrey Allen Junge Ttee Amd 07/09/19  377,960   377,960      *
Karl L Fisher  15,912   15,912      *
Kathryn I Chaney  2,071   2,071      *
Keith Liggett  2,071   2,071      *
Keith R Schroeder  57,187   57,187      *
Kenneth M Cleveland  10,608   10,608      *
Kenneth W Cleveland  42,195   42,195      *
Kent Phippen  9,792   9,792      *
Kevin Conroy  4,563   4,563      *
Kiefer Light  53,500   53,500      *
Kyle G Buchakjian  9,597   9,597      *
Larry S Kaplan Marla B Kaplan Jt/Wros  14,065   14,065      *
Larry V Lowrance  6,891   6,891      *
Laura Lehmuller  9,327   9,327      *
Laura Mackey  4   4      *
Lauro Living Trust Uad 10/30/19 John Lauro & Christine L Lauro Ttees  689   689      *
Lawrence Yelin  3,040   3,040      *
Legendcap Opportunity Fund  40,000   40,000      *

Leonard Schleicher (9)

  65,000(8)  65,000(8)     *
Leslie Bodenstein  3,500   3,500      *
Lighthouse Capital LLC  74,000   74,000      *

Linda Taglich (9)

  9,350(8)  9,350(8)     *
Louis And Judith Miller Family Trust Louis & Judith Miller Ttees  17,116   17,116      *
Louis G Selvaggio  10,608   10,608      *
Lucy C Edmondson  13,260   13,260      *
Margaret Esposito  41,764   41,764      *
Mark Bourque  26,097   26,097      *
Mark J Butler  3,457   3,457      *
Mark Vaughan Andrea Vaughan Jt Ten  18,557   18,557      *
Marvin J Loutsenhizer  21,321   21,321      *
Mary Kay Berg  1,153   1,153      *
Matthew A Keefer  13,786   13,786      *

Matthew Dejesus Taglich (9)

  10,608   10,608      *
Matthew G Kiernan Cheryl A Kiernan Jt Ten  25,000   25,000      *
Matthew R Bong  25,829   25,829      *
Maurice Solomon  73,253   73,253      *
Michael A Rutledge Tanya Rutledge Jt Ten  26,520   26,520      *
Michael Brunone  7,400(8)  7,400(8)     *
Michael Foster & Kathryn L Foster Jtwros Tod Dtd 01/06/04  40,000   40,000      *

Michael N Taglich (3), (9)

  1,161,466(8)  1,117,194(8)  44,272   *

Michael N Taglich & Claudia Taglich (3), (9)

  311,343   311,343      *

Michael N Taglich Keogh-Account (3), (9)

  280,311   280,311      *
Michael P Hagerty  61,442   61,442      *

Michael Taglich Cust Fbo Amanda Taglich Utma Ny Until Age 21 (3), (9)

  13,371   13,371      *
Michael Taglich Cust Fbo Stella Taglich Utma Ny Until Age 21 (3), (9)  13,371   13,371      *
Michael Taglich Cust For Lucy Taglich Utma Ny Until Age 21 (3), (9)  25,363   25,363      *
Mitchell Spearman  41,413   41,413      *
Monica Bertsch  13,000   13,000      *
Mordecai Bluth  1,321   1,321      *

24

Nancy C Hubbard  11,929   11,929      *
Nicholas R Toms  11,974   11,974      *
Nicholas R Toms & Caroline M Toms  9,109   9,109      *
Nicholas Taglich & Juliana Taglich Jt/Wros (9)  80,770   80,120   650   *
Nina Lisa Bertsch  70,000   70,000      *
Norper Investments  29,165   29,165      *
Nutie Dowdle  224,390   224,390      *
Nuview Ira Fbo Francis Bissaillon Ira  53,040   53,040      *
Nuview Ira Fbo Gordon Johnson Ira  37,128   37,128      *
Nuview Ira Fbo John C Guttilla - Ira Roth (4)  1,518   1,518      *
Nuview Ira Fbo John Guttilla Ira (4)  40,642   10,642   30,000   *
Nuview Ira Fbo John T Glancy  25,000   25,000      *
Nuview Ira Fbo Lawrence Kane Ira  21,216   21,216      *
Nuview Ira Fbo Luisa Kane Ira  21,216   21,216      *
Nuview Ira Fbo Michael Wilson  26,520   26,520      *
Nuview Ira Fbo Peggy Guttilla Ira  9,971   9,971      *
Nuview Ira Fbo Robert F Taglich 9912135 Ira (5), (9)  28,903   28,903      *
Nuview Ira Fbo Robert Taglich (5), (9)  70,000   70,000      *
Nuview Ira Fbo Samuel E Leonard - Ira  1,381   1,381      *
Nuview Ira Fbo Starr F Schlobohm Jr - Inherited Ira  4,838   4,838      *
Nuview Ira Fbo Terry N Thuemling  15,900   15,900      *
Nuview Ira Fbo Timothy M Fitzpatrick Ira  10,608   10,608      *
Nuview Ira Fbo Vincent J Mcgill Ira  10,608   10,608      *
Olivia Sofia Taglich (9)  10,608   10,608      *
Paladin Holdings LLC  406,079   406,079      *
Pamela M Walsh & Brian Walsh  36,067   36,067      *
Patricia Tschohl Tod  4,147   4,147      *
Patrick Heirigs  1,152   1,152      *
Paul Seid  69,601   69,601      *
Perrault Family Trust - Family Trust Uad 03/05/12 Karen D Perrault Ttee  12,195   12,195      *
Pershing Llc Cust Ar-And-Associates Individual(K) Fbo Arthur Resnikoff  4,147   4,147      *
Pershing Llc Cust Fbo Angel Rosario - Ira R/O  2,763   2,763      *
Pershing Llc Cust Fbo Arnold E Needleman - Ira R/O  3,457   3,457      *
Pershing Llc Cust Fbo David Random - Ira  6,915   6,915      *
Pershing Llc Cust Fbo Francine C Massie - Ira R/O  1,381   1,381      *
Pershing Llc Cust Fbo Janet Sau-Han Ho Ira  5,330   5,330      *
Pershing Llc Cust Fbo Richard S Smith - Roth Ira  689   689      *
Peter C Murphy  27,662   27,662      *
Peter Mangiameli  6,915   6,915      *
Pierre Elliott  11,929   11,929      *
Puddleglum Investments LLC  2,763   2,763      *
R2Mj LLC  3,457   3,457      *
Rachel T Baroni Trust Uad 12/31/94 Pj Baroni & Rt Baroni Ttees Amd 8/11/09  42,071   42,071      *
Richard Buchakjian  40,327   40,327      *
Richard Duke  134,469   134,469      *
Richard F Bero  5,829   5,829      *
Richard L Gerhardt  6,361   6,361      *
Richard Molinsky  50,000   50,000      *
Richard Oh (9)  31,950(8)  31,950(8)     *

25

Rj Edmondson Tr Fbo Amy Uad 02/27/19 John H Edmondson Tr  13,260   13,260      *
Robert A Sourek Jr  53,040   53,040      *
Robert Banzer  12,500   12,500      *
Robert Brooks  107,961   107,961      *
Robert Chaiken  5,587   5,587      *
Robert F Taglich (5), (9)  934,096(8)  919,824(8)  14,272   *
Robert F Taglich C/F Xavier F Taglich Under New York Ugma Minors Act (5), (9)  10,608   10,608      *
Robert G Welty  35,831   35,831      *
Robert Koski  13,371   13,371      *
Robert L Debruyn Trust Uad 10/5/94 Robert L Debruyn & Tracey H Debruyn Ttee  118,557   118,557      *
Robert M Deluca Revocable Living Trust Uad 12/14/10 Robert M Deluca & Nichol M Deluca  7,001   7,001      *
Robert M Lorenzo (9)  10,350(8)  10,350(8)     *
Robert Romanet & Maureen L Romanet Jt Ten  10,000   10,000      *
Robert Schroeder (6)  312,056(8)  282,056(8)  30,000   *
Robert W Allen Iii Residuary Trust U/A Susan M Allen Uad 4/29/08  1,170   1,170      *
Robert W Allen Jr  53,040   53,040      *
Robert W Allen Trust Uad 04/29/08 Robert W Allen Ttee  82,457   82,457      *
Robert W Main Ttee Under The Robert W Main Trust Dtd 9/7/05  2,763   2,763      *
Roger W Lunstra & Joyce M Lunstra Living Trust Dtd 6/15/07  26,508   26,508      *
Ronald A Bero  118,344   118,344      *
Ronald A Rayson  27,375   27,375      *
Ronald D Cowan Irrevocable Trust Uad 05/08/03 Marsha S Cowan Ttee  12,195   12,195      *
Ronald Johnson  57,008   57,008      *
Russell Bernier (9)  29,800(8)  29,800(8)     *
Samuel E Leonard Trust Uad 2-5-90 Samuel E Leonard Ttee  25,304   25,304      *
Scot Holding Inc.  20,957   20,957      *
Scott Bennett Schneider & Tanya Rose Schneider Jt Ten  200,000   200,000      *
Shadow Capital LLC  130,973   130,973      *
Sophia Estelle Taglich (9)  10,608   10,608      *
Spahr-Derebery Family Trust Uad 10-11-90 Gregory E Spahr & M Jennifer Derebery Ttee  214,580   214,580      *
Stanley A Bornstein  1,057   1,057      *
Stephen C Radocchia  1,587   1,587      *
Stephen Hughes  118,557   118,557      *
Stephen Koppekin  2,071   2,071      *
Sterling Family Investment LLC  435,580   435,580      *
Steve McCalley  8,750   8,750      *
Steve Redmon & Brenda Redmon Jt Ten Wros  9,171   9,171      *
Steven Farber  1,381   1,381      *
Steven Heirigs  1,152   1,152      *
Steven R Berlin  17,498   17,498      *
Steven Smith (7)  776,520   776,520      *
Sullivan Associates Emp Ret Plan  3,457   3,457      *
Susan Thorstenn & Magnus Thorstenn Ten Comm  5,292   5,292      *
Sushrut Parikh  3,457   3,457      *
Tad Wilson  118,557   118,557      *
Terry J Kuras  30,000   30,000      *
The Antoinette Porco Revocable Living Trust Uad 11/16/92 Antoinette Porco Ttee Amd 2/23/18  7,001   7,001      *
The Carolyn L. Foutch Living Trust Uad 05/17/13 Carolyn L Foutch Ttee  53,981   53,981      *
The Claudia Hess Trust Uad 05/25/18 Claudia Worthington Hess Trustee  11,934   11,934      *
The Corbet L Clark Jr Living Trust Corbet L Clark Jr Trustee  20,000   20,000      *

26

The Ernest H Hill Living Trust Uad 12/17/2001  Gregory P Hill Trustee  31,929   31,929      *
The Hillary Bibicoff Revocable Trust Dtd 4/19/07 Hillary Bibicoff Ttee  22,597   22,597      *
The Ladendorf Family Revocable Living Trust Uad 04/11/11  Mark C Ladendorf & Debra L Ladendorf Ttees  55,675   55,675      *
The Sdm Irrevocable Trust Fbo Andrew Seid Uad 11/05/04 Paul Seid Ttee  86,974   86,974      *
The Sdm Irrevocable Trust Fbo Lauren Seid Uad 11/05/04 Paul Seid Ttee  86,974   86,974      *
The William W Kehl Revocable Trust Uad 12/06/17  80,000   80,000      *
Thomas Heirigs  50,523   50,523      *
Thomas J Leonard  8,750   8,750      *
Thomas L Ryan  5,831   5,831      *
Tina Marie Domenice  661   661      *
Todd Stuart Bodenstein  10,500   10,500      *
Tom C Mina  4,563   4,563      *
Tracey H Debruyn Trust Uad 10/5/94 Tracey H Debruyn & Robert L Debruyn Ttee  118,557   118,557      *
Vahan Buchakjian  3,500   3,500      *
Vincent M Palmieri  12,000(8)  12,000(8)     *
Vincent Milazzo  10,373   10,373      *
Wafgal Limited  11,660   11,660      *
Walter E Beisler  11,660   11,660      *
Weedie Trust Uad 07/20/16 Wendy H Tweety & Jeffrey C Tweedy Ttees  20,000   20,000      *
William Kyle Neely  95,889   95,889      *
William M Cooke (9)  46,305(8)  46,305(8)     *
Wulf Paulick & Renate Paulick Jtwros  100,000   100,000      *
TOTAL  14,375,099   14,239,033   120,338   *

(1)The beneficial ownership of the common stock by the selling stockholders set forth in the table is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act of 1934, and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rule, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the selling stockholders has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares, which the selling stockholders has the right to acquire within 60 days.

(2)Assumes all shares will be sold in the offering.

(3)Michael N. Taglich is a director of the Company.

(4)John Guttilla is a director of the Company.

(5)Robert F. Taglich is a beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock.

(6)Robert Schroeder is a director of the Company.

(7)Steven Smith is the President, CEO and a director of the Company.

(8)Includes shares of common stock underlying warrants held by the applicable selling stockholder as follows: Christopher C Schreiber (5,000 warrant shares); Denis McEvoy TOD DTD 3/19/2013 (46,305 warrant shares); Douglas E. Hailey (96,610 warrant shares),  Gilda Gaertner (9,350 warrant shares),  Howard Halpern (1,850 warrant shares), Jennifer DenDekker (7,500 warrant shares); John Nobile TOD DTD 3/21/06 (9,450 warrant shares); Juan V. Noble (9,450 warrant shares); Leonard Schleicher (65,000 warrant shares);  Linda Taglich (9,350 warrant shares);  Michael Brunone 7,400 (warrant shares; Michael N. Taglich (271,034 warrant shares); Richard Oh (31,950 warrant shares); Robert F. Taglich 250,402 (warrant shares); Robert M Lorenzo (10,350 warrant shares); Robert Schroeder (228,441 warrant shares); Russell Bernier 29,800 (warrant shares); Vincent M.  Palmieri (12,000 warrant shares); and William M. Cooke 46,305 (warrant shares).

(9)Taglich Brothers, Inc. is a registered broker dealer and FINRA member.  The following persons are currently affiliates or registered representatives of Taglich Brothers, Inc., or are controlled by, or are family members of, current affiliates or registered representatives of Taglich Brothers, Inc.: Denis McEvoy Tod Dtd 3/19/2013; Douglas E. Hailey; Gary Kurnov & Lauren Mazer Jt. Ten; Hope A. Taglich First Party Supplemental Needs Trust Uad 8/23/17 Michael Taglich Trustee; Linda Taglich; Matthew Dejesus Taglich; Michael N. Taglich & Claudia Taglich; Michael N. Taglich Keogh Account; Michael Taglich Cust Fbo Amanda Taglich Utma Ny Until Age 21; Michael Taglich Cust Fbo Stella Taglich Utma Ny Until Age 21; Michael Taglich Cust For Lucy Taglich Utma Ny Until Age 21; Matthew Dejesus Taglich; Nicholas Taglich & Juliana Taglich Jt/Wros; Nuview Ira Fbo Robert F. Taglich 9912135; Nuview Ira Fbo Robert Taglich; Olivia Sofia Taglich; Richard Oh; Robert F. Taglich; Robert F. Taglich C/F Xavier F Taglich Under New York Ugma Minors Act; Robert M. Lorenzo; Robert Schroeder; Sophia Estelle Taglich; William M. Cooke; Russell Bernier; Leonard Schleicher; Gilda Gaertner; Howard Halpern; John Nobile TOD DTD 3/21/06; and Juan V. Noble. All Company common stock owned by any affiliates or representatives of Taglich Brothers, Inc. were acquired through private placement transactions conducted by the Company and were acquired on the same terms and conditions as third party investors in those offerings, or, in the case of certain shares held by Michael Taglich in very limited circumstances were acquired in privately negotiated transactions or through open market purchases. In all cases such persons acquired their shares of Company common stock for investment purposes, and in no case did such persons have any agreements or understandings, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute those securities.

27

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

Each Selling Stockholder and any of their pledgees, assignees and successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or all of their shares of common stock on the trading market or any other stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in options outstandingprivate transactions. Until such time as our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB (or OTCQX) tier of the over-the-counter market, the Selling Stockholders will sell their shares at a fixed price of $1.50 per share. Once our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB (or OTCQX) tier of the over-the-counter market, the Selling Stockholders may sell their shares at prevailing market prices. Upon the effectiveness of the Registration Statement of which this Prospectus forms a part, we intend to apply for an upgrade of our OTC market tier from “Pink No Information” to “OTCQB” or “OTCQX.” Although we believe that we will be eligible for the OTCQB market tier upon becoming an SEC reporting issuer, we can provide no guarantee that our application for the OTCQB market will be accepted. A Selling Stockholder may use any one or more of the following methods when selling shares:

ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;
block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;
purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;
an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
privately negotiated transactions;
settlement of short sales entered into after the date of this prospectus;
broker-dealers may agree with the Selling Stockholders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;
a combination of any such methods of sale;
through the writing or settlement of options or other hedging transactions, whether through an options exchange or otherwise; or
any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.

The Selling Stockholders may also sell shares under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as follows:amended (the “Securities Act”), if available, rather than under this prospectus.

Broker-dealers engaged by the Selling Stockholders may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the Selling Stockholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of shares, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated. Each Selling Stockholder does not expect these commissions and discounts relating to its sales of shares to exceed what is customary in the types of transactions involved.

The Selling Stockholders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the Shares may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the Shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. Each Selling Stockholder has informed us that it does not have any agreement or understanding, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the Common Stock.

The Shares will be sold only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers if required under applicable state or provincial securities laws. In addition, in certain states or provinces, the Shares may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or qualification requirement is available and is complied with.

Under applicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person engaged in the distribution of the Shares may not simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to our common stock for a period of two business days prior to the commencement of the distribution. In addition, the Selling Stockholders will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of shares of our common stock by the Selling Stockholders or any other person.

28

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. Certain statements in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations and involve various risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements. We encourage you to review the information the “Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” sections in this prospectus.

Our financial statements are stated in United States Dollars (“$”) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this prospectus. In this prospectus, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars and all references to “common shares” refer to the common shares in our capital stock.

Overview

DecisionPoint, through its subsidiary corporations, is a provider and integrator of mobility and wireless systems for business organizations. The Company designs, deploys and supports mobile computing systems that enable customers to access employers’ data networks at various locations (i.e. the retail selling floor, nurse workstations, warehouse and distribution centers or on the road deliveries via enterprise-grade handheld computers, printers, tablets, and smart phones). The Company also develops and integrates data capture equipment including bar code scanners and radio frequency identification (RFID) readers.

Known or Anticipated Trends

In 2019, we realized a 25% growth in revenue to $44 million, in part due to our acquisition of Royce Digital Systems, Inc. (“RDS”) in June of 2018. After completing the acquisition of RDS in June of 2018, DecisionPoint fully integrated both companies in 2019. This acquisition enabled the Company to build out its presence on the West Coast, expand into the healthcare industry and grow both its portfolio of services and recurring revenue base.

We currently do business with approximately 700 clients throughout the U.S.

In December 2019, a novel coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”) was initially reported, and in March 2020, the World Health Organization characterized COVID-19 as a pandemic. COVID-19 has had a widespread and detrimental effect on the global economy as a result of the continued increase in the number of cases and affected countries and actions by public health and governmental authorities, businesses, other organizations and individuals to address the outbreak, including travel bans and restrictions, quarantines, shelter in place, stay at home or total lock-down orders and business limitations and shutdowns. The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected certain of our customers, such as those in the retail sector. However, to date, particularly given the range of industries in which our customers operate, the Company’s results of operations and financial performance have not been materially adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The future impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and results of operations is unknown and will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the effectiveness of any distribution of vaccines, and any additional preventative and protective actions that governments, or we or our customers, may direct, which may result in an extended period of continued business disruption and reduced operations. While business and revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 were generally strong, our customers, particularly those in the retail sector, have been significantly impacted by COVID-19 and our results of operations during 2020 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in 2021 in light of the uncertainties surrounding the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on our customers.

The following is a summary of updates on our business through December 31, 2020:

Net sales, excluding net sales from ExtenData, are expected to have significantly increased in the fourth quarter of 2020 when compared to the fourth quarter of 2019. The impact of COVID-19 and the resulting slowdown and volatility in economic activity may result in many of our recurring customers reducing their purchases from us in future periods.

Notwithstanding these facts, our previous investments in sales and marketing resources has resulted in the Company earning new business from several new customers during 2020.  In addition, we have benefited from the timing of certain equipment upgrade projects initiated in 2020 by certain customers.  Such projects typically occur every three-to-five years and are significant in dollar amount. The net sales in 2020 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in future periods.

Our acquisition of Royce Digital Systems, Inc. in June 2018 resulted in a greater diversification of the Company’s customer base and increased its presence in the healthcare sector.  Given the increased demand in healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company’s sales to customers in the healthcare sector has increased year-over-year.

29

        Weighted -    
  Options     Average  Aggregate 
  Available  Options  Exercise  Intrinsic 
  for Grant  Outstanding  Price  Value 
             
December 31, 2012  455,495   544,505  $1.82  $- 
Granted  -   -   -   - 
Exercised  -   -   -   - 
Forfeited  -   -   -   - 
June 30, 2013  455,495   544,505  $1.82  $- 
                 
Exercisable options at June 30, 2013      446,374  $1.75  $- 

Components of Results of Operations

Net Sales

Net sales reflect revenue from the sale of hardware, software, consumables and professional services to our clients, net of sales taxes.

Revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services under the terms of a contract and is measured as the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for transferring goods or providing services. We do not have any material extended payment terms, as payment is due at or shortly after the time of the sale. Sales, value-added and other taxes collected concurrently with revenue producing activities are excluded from revenue.

Cost of Sales, Sales and Marketing Expenses, and General and Administrative Expenses

The following illustrates the primary costs classified in each major expense category:

Cost of sales, include:

Cost of goods sold for hardware, software and consumables;
Cost of professional services, including maintenance;
Markdowns of inventory; and
Freight expenses.

Sales and marketing expenses, include:

Sales salaries, benefits and commissions;
Consulting;
Marketing tools
Travel; and
Marketing promotions and trade shows.

General and administrative expenses, include:

Corporate payroll and benefits;
Depreciation and amortization;
Rent;
Utilities; and
Other administrative costs such as maintenance of corporate offices, supplies, legal, consulting, audit and tax preparation and other professional fees.

30



F-14

Results of Operations

The following table summarizes information aboutkey components of our results of operations for the periods indicated, both in dollars and as a percentage of our net sales (in thousands):

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
  2020  2019  2020  2019 
Statements of Operations Data: (unaudited) 
Net sales $11,119  $11,854  $45,059  $31,741 
Cost of sales  8,997   8,944   34,728   23,996 
Gross profit  2,122   2,910   10,331   7,745 
Sales and marketing expenses  1,021   1,297   4,001   3,675 
General and administrative expenses  1,027   894   3,232   3,041 
Total operating expenses  2,048   2,191   7,233   6,716 
Operating income  74   719   3,098   1,029 
Interest expense  61   243   232   572 
Other (income) loss  (202)  1   (212)  1 
Income before income taxes  215   475   3,078   456 
Income tax (benefit) expense  (2)  124   817   119 
Net income attributable to common shareholders $217  $351  $2,261  $337 
Percentage of Net Sales:                
Net sales  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Cost of sales  80.9%  75.5%  77.1%  75.6%
Gross profit  19.1%  24.5%  22.9%  24.4%
Sales and marketing expenses  9.2%  10.9%  8.9%  11.6%
General and administrative expenses  9.2%  7.5%  7.2%  9.6%
Total operating expenses  18.4%  18.5%  16.1%  21.2%
Operating income  0.7%  6.1%  6.9%  3.2%
Interest expense  0.5%  2.0%  0.5%  1.8%
Other (income) loss  (1.8)%  %  (0.5)%  %
Income before income taxes  1.9%  4.0%  6.8%  1.4%
Income tax (benefit) expense  %  1.0%  1.8%  0.4%
Net income attributable to common shareholders  2.0%  3.0%  5.0%  1.1%

31

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2020 compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2019 (Unaudited)

Net sales

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
  Dollar  Percent 
  2020  2019  Change  Change 
  (dollars in thousands)       
Hardware and software $7,516  $7,361  $155   2.1%
Consumables  659   1,224   (565)  (46.2)%
Professional services  2,944   3,269   (325)  (9.9)%
  $11,119  $11,854  $(735)  (6.2)%

Net sales decreased by 6.2%, or $0.7 million, during the three months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the same period of the prior year. The decrease in net sales was primarily driven by a decrease in opened locations from one of our healthcare customers coupled with fewer customers for consumables and professional services as compared to prior year, partially offset by an increase in handheld hardware and software sales from one specific retail customer during the quarter related to a second phase rollout of hardware upgrades. Significant customer equipment upgrades occur periodically and related net sales, and the timing of those net sales, are difficult to estimate with a high degree of certainty.

Cost of sales

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
  Dollar  Percent 
  2020  2019  Change  Change 
  (dollars in thousands)    
Hardware and software $6,325  $6,154  $171   2.8%
Consumables  459   840   (381)  (45.4)%
Professional services  2,213   1,950   263   13.5%
  $8,997  $8,944  $53   0.6%

Cost of sales slightly increased by 0.6%, or $0.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the prior year quarter primarily due to higher sales volume in hardware and software and higher headcount for professional services, partially offset by lower sales volume in consumables.

32

Gross profit

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
  2020  2019 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Gross profit:      
Hardware and software $1,191  $1,207 
Consumables  200   384 
Professional services  731   1,319 
Total gross profit $2,122  $2,910 
         
Gross profit percentage:        
Hardware and software  15.8%  16.4%
Consumables  30.3%  31.4%
Professional services  24.8%  40.3%
Total gross profit percentage  19.1%  24.5%

Gross profit decreased $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the prior year period, primarily as a result of lower sales volume. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of sales for professional services was attributed to an increase in compensation associated with a higher headcount as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2019.

Sales and marketing expenses

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Dollar  Percent 
  2020 2019  Change  Change 
  (dollars in thousands)   
Sales and marketing expenses $1,021 $1,297  $(276)  (21.3)%
As a percentage of sales 9.2%  10.9%     (1.7)%

Sales and marketing expenses decreased $0.3 million, or 21.3%, for the three months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to prior year. As a percentage of sales, sales and marketing expenses improved 170 basis points primarily as a result of lower sales and marketing personnel costs associated with lower net sales.

General and administrative expenses

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
  Dollar  Percent 
  2020  2019  Change  Change 
  (dollars in thousands)    
General and administrative expenses $1,027  $894  $133   14.9%
As a percentage of sales  9.2%  7.5%     1.7%

General and administrative expenses increased $0.1 million, or 14.9%, for the three months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the same period of the prior year. The increase in costs was primarily due to an increase in director and executive compensation and legal and compliance costs. As a percentage of sales, general and administrative costs deleveraged 170 basis points due to fixed costs associated with lower net sales as compared to the same period of the prior year combined with higher director and executive compensation and legal and compliance costs.

33

Interest expense. The decrease in interest expense to $61,000 from $243,000, last year, was due to a decrease in average debt balances compared to last year coupled with lower interest rates.

Other (income) loss. Other income during the three months ended September 30, 2020 was attributed to a gain associated with a legal settlement.

Income tax (benefit) expense. Income tax benefit was $2,000, compared to income tax expense of $124,000, in the same period last year.

Net income. Net income was $217,000 compared to $351,000, in the same period last year.

Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 (Unaudited)

Net sales

  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  Dollar  Percent 
  2020  2019  Change  Change 
  (dollars in thousands)       
Hardware and software $33,565  $18,992  $14,573   76.7%
Consumables  2,371   3,763   (1,392)  (37.0)%
Professional services  9,123   8,986   137   1.5%
  $45,059  $31,741  $13,318   42.0%

Net sales increased by 42.0%, or $13.3 million, during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the same period of the prior year. The increase in net sales was primarily driven by an increase in hardware and software sales in the retail sector from one specific customer that completed two phases of equipment upgrades during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 coupled with higher sales in the healthcare sector due to COVID-19 essential business activities. Significant customer equipment upgrades occur periodically and related net sales, and the timing of those net sales, are difficult to estimate with a high degree of certainty.

Cost of sales

  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  Dollar  Percent 
  2020  2019  Change  Change 
  (dollars in thousands)    
Hardware and software $26,915  $15,874  $15,874   69.6%
Consumables  1,661   2,622   (961)  (36.7)%
Professional services  6,152   5,500   652   11.9%
  $34,728  $23,996  $10,732   44.7%

Cost of sales increased by 44.7%, or $10.7 million, during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019 primarily due to higher sales volume as discussed above coupled with fixed payroll and benefit costs for professional services associated with an increase in headcount.

34

Gross profit

  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
  2020  2019 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Gross profit:      
Hardware and software $6,650  $3,118 
Consumables  710   1,141 
Professional services  2,971   3,486 
Total gross profit $10,331  $7,745 
         
Gross profit percentage:        
Hardware and software  19.8%  16.4%
Consumables  29.9%  30.3%
Professional services  32.6%  38.8%
Total gross profit percentage  22.9%  24.4%

Gross profit increased $2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the prior year period, primarily as a result of higher sales volume, which was driven by one specific retail customer that completed equipment upgrade activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2020. The aggregate gross margin decreased during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 primarily due to higher fixed payroll and benefit costs for professional services and lower net sales for consumables.

Sales and marketing expenses

  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  Dollar  Percent 
  2020  2019  Change  Change 
  (dollars in thousands)    
Sales and marketing expenses $4,001  $3,675  $326   0.9%
As a percentage of sales  8.9%  11.6%     (2.7)%

Sales and marketing expenses increased $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to prior year primarily as a result of higher sales commissions associated with higher sales volume. As a percentage of sales, sales and marketing costs improved 270 basis points primarily due to fixed sales and marketing personnel costs associated with higher net sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

General and administrative expenses

  Nine Months Ended
 September 30,
  Dollar  Percent 
  2020  2019  Change  Change 
  (dollars in thousands)    
General and administrative expenses $3,232  $3,041  $191   6.3%
As a percentage of sales  7.2%  9.6%     (2.4)%

General and administrative expenses increased $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 as compared to the same period of the prior year primarily due to an increase in director and executive compensation and legal and compliance fees.

Interest expense. The decrease in interest expense to $232,000 from $572,000, during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, was due to a decrease in the average debt balances compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and lower interest rates.

Income tax expense. Income tax expense was $817,000 compared to income tax expense of $119,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The 2020 income tax rate was estimated using an annual effective tax rate of 26.5%.

Net income. Net income was $2,261,000 compared to $337,000, during the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

35

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2019 compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2018

  Year Ended
December 31,
 
  2019  2018 
Statements of Income Data: (in thousands) 
Net sales $43,889  $35,158 
Cost of sales  33,133   27,901 
Gross profit  10,756   7,257 
Sales and marketing expenses  4,907   3,341 
General and administrative expenses  3,999   3,433 
Total operating expenses  8,906   6,774 
Operating income  1,850   483 
Interest expense  649   391 
Income before income taxes  1,201   92 
Income tax expense (benefit)  310   (3,883)
Net income attributable to common shareholders $891  $3,975 
Percentage of Net Sales:        
Net sales  100.0%  100.0%
Cost of sales  75.5%  79.4%
Gross profit  24.5%  20.6%
Sales and marketing expenses  11.2%  9.5%
General and administrative expenses  9.1%  9.8%
Total operating expenses  20.3%  19.3%
Operating income  4.2%  1.4%
Interest expense  1.5%  1.1%
Income before income taxes  2.7%  0.3%
Income tax expense (benefit)  0.7%  (11.0)%
Net income attributable to common shareholders  2.0%  11.3%

Net sales

  Year Ended
December 31,
  Dollar  Percent 
  2019  2018  Change  Change 
  (dollars in thousands)       
Hardware and software $27,184  $23,231  $3,953   17.0%
Consumables  4,806   2,778   2,028   73.0%
Professional services  11,899   9,149   2,750   30.1%
  $43,889  $35,158  $8,731   24.8%

Net sales increased in 2019 primarily due to a $6.6 million increase in net sales resulting from the acquisition of RDS which was acquired in June 2018. Additionally, net sales from existing customers increased $2.1 million compared to 2018 primarily due to an increase in product upgrades. Professional services increased $2.8 million, or 30.1%, as compared to 2018 primarily due to an increase in professional services in connection with the initial implementation of our products and product upgrades.

Cost of sales

  Year Ended
December 31,
  Dollar  Percent 
  2019  2018  Change  Change 
  (dollars in thousands)     
Hardware and software $22,597  $19,639  $2,958   15.1%
Consumables  3,269   1,975   1,294   65.5%
Professional services  7,267   6,287   980   15.6%
  $33,133  $27,901  $5,232   18.8%

Cost of sales for year ended December 31, 2019 increased $5.2 million, or 18.8%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in cost of sales was primarily driven by the increase in net sales discussed above, which was primarily a result of including the results of RDS for 12 months in 2019 versus only six months in 2018.

36

Gross profit

  Year Ended
December 31,
 
  2019  2018 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Gross profit:      
Hardware and software $4,587  $3,592 
Consumables $1,537  $803 
Professional services $4,632  $2,862 
Total gross profit $10,756  $7,257 
         
Gross profit percentage:        
Hardware and software  16.9%  15.5%
Consumables  32.0%  28.9%
Professional services  38.9%  31.3%
Total gross profit percentage  24.5%  20.6%

Gross profit increased $3.5 million in 2019 as compared to the prior year primarily as a result of higher sales volume. As a percentage of net sales, total gross profit increased 390 basis points primarily due an increase in the mix of product upgrades, which contain higher gross margins for product, and services as compared to gross margins associated with implementation costs for new customers. Additionally, gross margins increased due to reductions in headcount for professional services and software product lines coupled with higher margins associated with consumables and professional services for RDS.

Sales and marketing expenses

  Year Ended
December 31,
  Dollar  Percent 
  2019  2018  Change  Change 
  (dollars in thousands)     
Sales and marketing expenses $4,907  $3,341  $1,566   46.9%
As a percentage of sales  11.2%  9.5%     1.7%

Sales and marketing expenses increased in 2019 as compared to 2018 primarily due to higher commissions associated with higher net sales coupled with increases in marketing expenses associated with our website and marketing tools for RDS and an increase in consulting costs associated with various marketing initiatives.

General and administrative expenses

  Year Ended
December 31,
  Dollar  Percent 
  2019  2018  Change  Change 
  (dollars in thousands)     
General and administrative expenses $3,999  $3,432  $567   16.5%
As a percentage of sales  9.1%  9.8%     (0.7)%

General and administrative expenses increased in 2019 as compared to the prior year primarily as a result of higher share-based compensation costs of approximately $241,000 that resulted primarily from the issuance of a fully vested stock optionsaward to a certain officer.

37

Interest expense. The increase in interest expense to $649,000 from $391,000, for the year ended December 31, 2018, was due to higher outstanding term debt and higher interest rates.

Income tax expense (benefit). Income tax expense was $310,000, or 25.8% of income before income taxes, compared to income tax benefit of $3,883,000 of income before income taxes, for the year ended December 31, 2018. The income tax benefit last year was primarily attributable to the reversal of the valuation allowance against our net deferred income tax assets. Management reversed the valuation allowance as a result of the Company’s recent earnings, as well as forecasted future profits.

Net income. Net income was $891,000 compared to $3,975,000, for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2020, our principal sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents totaling $3.7 million and an accounts receivable-based line of credit that is scheduled to expire in September 2023 (as further described below). We have financed our operations primarily through cash generated from operating activities, borrowings from our credit facilities and sales of our common stock. We have historically generated operating losses and negative cash flows from operating activities as reflected in our accumulated deficit. Based on our recent trends and our current future projections, we expect to generate cash from operations for the years ending December 31, 2020 and 2021. Given our projection, combined with our existing cash and credit facilities, we believe the Company has sufficient liquidity for at least the next 12 months.

Our ability to continue to meet our cash requirements will depend on, among other things, the duration of COVID-19 related restrictions on U.S. and global economic activity, our ability to achieve anticipated levels of revenues and cash flow from operations, our ability to manage costs and working capital successfully and the continued availability of financing, if needed. We cannot provide any assurance that our assumptions used to estimate our liquidity requirements will remain accurate due to the unprecedented nature of the disruption to our operations and the unpredictability of the COVID-19 global pandemic. Consequently, our estimates of the duration of the pandemic and the severity of the impact on our future earnings and cash flows could change and have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition. In the event of a sustained market deterioration, and declines in net sales, we may need additional liquidity, which would require us to evaluate available alternatives and take appropriate actions. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to obtain any additional sources of financing or liquidity on acceptable terms, or at all.

Working Capital (Deficit)

  September 30,
2020
  December 31,
2019
  Increase/
(Decrease)
 
(in thousands)         
Current assets $15,583  $17,624  $(2,041)
Current liabilities  14,019   20,026   (6,007)
Working capital (deficit)  1,564   (2,402)  (3,966)

The improvement in working capital is primarily due to a decrease in current debt liabilities, specifically a reduction in the outstanding line of credit balance of $3.2 million at December 31, 2019.

Line of Credit

Our amended and restated credit agreement with Pacific Western Business Finance (“PWBF”), formerly known as CapitalSource Business Financial Group, provides for a $10 million line of credit with a maturity date of September 2023. The line of credit bears interest at the prime rate plus 1.25% (4.75% at September 30, 2020) and is secured by substantially all of our U.S. assets.

38

As of September 30, 2020, availability under the line of credit was approximately $5.1 million, which is determined from a borrowing base calculation on our existing accounts receivable balance. As of September 30, 2020, we had no outstanding borrowings under the line of credit.

Promissory Notes

In October 2018, we completed a private placement of subordinated promissory notes in the principal amount of $1,500,000, of which $500,000 remains outstanding as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013:


   Options Outstanding  Options Exercisable 
      Weighted-        Weighted-    
      Average  Weighted-     Average  Weighted- 
Range of     Remaining  Average     Remaining  Average 
Exercise  Number  Contractual  Exercise  Number  Contractual  Exercise 
Prices  Outstanding  Life (Years)  Price  Exercisable  Life (Years)  Price 
                    
$1.33 - 2.03   365,620   1.83  $1.65   355,461   1.79  $1.64 
$2.06 - 4.34   178,885   7.85   2.16   90,913   7.79   2.16 
                           
Total   544,505   3.81  $1.82   446,374   3.01  $1.75 

No awards were exercised during2020. The promissory notes carry an interest rate of 12% per annum, are not collateralized, and require quarterly interest payments with a maturity date of April 30, 2021. In connection with these promissory notes, we issued warrants to the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.placement agent to purchase 52,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.70 per share. The total fair value of awards vestedthe warrants on the issuance date was $18,000. In addition, under the offering terms, we issued 525,000 shares of our common stock to the holders of these promissory notes. The estimated fair value of these shares was $262,500 and such amount has been presented as a debt discount and is being amortized to interest expense through the maturity date of the promissory notes.

In June 2018, we issued another promissory note to PWBF with a principal amount of $750,000. This promissory note carried an annual interest rate of prime rate plus 1.25% (4.50% at September 30, 2020) with a maturity date of August 25, 2020. Principal payments are due and payable monthly in 26 consecutive payments each in the amount of $20,834 beginning June 25, 2018. In July 2020, this promissory note was paid in full.

In April and May 2020, we received $740,000 and $471,000, respectively, in proceeds from loans from PWBF, which were granted pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program of the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”). At the time we applied for the sixloans, we believed the Company qualified to receive the funds pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program. The loans carry an annual interest rate of 1.0% and have a maturity of two years. The CARES Act provides for forgiveness of up to the full amount borrowed under certain conditions.

On August 27, 2020, we received $150,000 in connection with a promissory note from the U.S. Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) under the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) program pursuant to the CARES Act. Under the terms of the EIDL promissory note, interest accrues on the outstanding principal at an interest rate of 3.75% per annum with a term of 30 years with equal monthly payments of principal and interest of $731 beginning on August 27, 2021.

Impact of CARES Act on Company Liquidity

On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed into law the CARES Act which, among other things, includes provisions relating to refundable payroll tax credits, deferment of employer side social security payments, net operating loss carryback periods, alternative minimum tax credit refunds, modifications to the net interest deduction limitations and technical corrections to tax depreciation methods for qualified improvement property.  We continue to examine the impacts the CARES Act may have on our business. As discussed above, we received loans under the Paycheck Protection Program and the EIDL program.

ExtenData Solutions, LLC Acquisition

On December 4, 2020, the Company entered into a Membership Unit Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) and concurrently therewith closed upon the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of ExtenData Solutions, LLC (“ExtenData”). As a result of the acquisition ExtenData became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. ExtenData is focused on enterprise mobility solutions and that provides software product development, mobile computing, identification and tracking solutions, and wireless tracking solutions. 

The purchase price for the acquisition was $4,250,000, subject to certain adjustments such as potential deductions for indebtedness and other transaction related expenses and bonuses. In addition, subject to the financial performance of ExtenData in each of the two years following closing, the Company may pay the sellers a total of up to an additional $750,000 in earn out payments. Of the purchase price, $500,000 was delivered into escrow at the closing to, among other things, cover any losses for which the sellers may be obligated to indemnify the Company. The Purchase Agreement imposes additional obligations on the parties, including restrictive covenants that are applicable to the sellers.

Cash Flow Analysis

  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
  2020  2019 
  (in thousands) 
Net cash provided by operating activities $3,431  $3,636 
Net used in investing activities  (353)  (78)
Net cash used in financing activities  (2,015)  (3,620)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $1,063  $(889)

39

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased to $3.4 million for the nine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 20132020 from $3.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The decrease was primarily due the timing of payments to vendors.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $353,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 which is comprised of earnout payments in connection with the acquisition of Royce and 2012purchases of capital expenditures of property and equipment. Net cash used in investing activities was $40,492.$78,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 which comprised of purchases of capital expenditures of $99,000, partially offset by cash acquired from the acquisition of RDS of $21,000.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 which primarily comprised of debt repayments, partially offset by proceeds of long-term debt. Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was $3.6 million which primarily comprised of the repayments of debt.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that may have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”).  This preparation requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.  US GAAP provides the framework from which to make these estimates, assumption and disclosures.  We choose accounting policies within US GAAP that management believes are appropriate to accurately and fairly report our operating results and financial position in a consistent manner.  Management regularly assesses these policies in light of current and forecasted economic conditions. While there are a number of significant accounting policies affecting our financial statements, we believe the following critical accounting policies involve the most complex, difficult and subjective estimates and judgments:

Revenue Recognition

We determine revenue recognition through the following steps: (1) identification of the contract with a customer; (2) identification of the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determination of the transaction price; (4) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognition of revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied.

We combine contracts with the same customer into a single contract for accounting purposes when the contracts are entered into at or near the same time and the contracts are negotiated as a single commercial package, consideration in one contract depends on the other contract, or the services are considered a single performance obligation. If an arrangement involves multiple performance obligations, the items are analyzed to determine the separate units of accounting (that is, are they distinct and are they distinct in the context of the customer contract). The total contract transaction price is allocated to the identified performance obligations based upon the relative standalone selling prices of the performance obligations. The standalone selling price is based on an observable price for services sold to other comparable customers, when available, or an estimated selling price using a cost plus margin approach. We estimate the amount of total contract consideration we expect to receive for variable arrangements by determining the most likely amount we expect to earn from the arrangement based on the expected quantities of services we expect to provide, and the contractual pricing based on those quantities. We only include some or a portion of variable consideration in the transaction price when it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur or when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. We consider the sensitivity of the estimate, our relationship and experience with our client and variable services being performed, the range of possible revenue amounts and the magnitude of the variable consideration to the overall arrangement.

As discussed in more detail below, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services under the terms of a contract and is measured as the amount of consideration, we expect to receive in exchange for transferring goods or providing services. We do not have any material extended payment terms, as payment is due at or shortly after the time of the sale. Sales, value-added and other taxes collected concurrently with revenue producing activities are excluded from revenue.

We recognize contract assets or unbilled receivables related to revenue recognized for services completed but not yet invoiced to our clients. Unbilled receivables are recorded when we have an unconditional right to contract consideration. A contract liability is recognized as deferred revenue when we invoice clients, or receive customer cash payments, in advance of performing the related services under the terms of a contract. Remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price allocated to the performance obligations that are unsatisfied as of the end of each reporting period. Deferred revenue is recognized as revenue when we have satisfied the related performance obligation.

40


Hardware, consumables and software products - We recognize product revenue at the point in time when a client takes control of the hardware and/or software, which typically occurs when title and risk of loss have passed to the client. Our selling terms and conditions reflect that F.O.B ‘dock’ contractual terms establish that control is transferred from us at the point in time when the product is shipped to the customer.

Revenues from software license sales are recognized as a single performance obligation on a gross basis as we are acting as a principal in these transactions at the point the software license is delivered to the customer. Generally, software licenses are sold with accompanying third-party delivered software assurance, which allows customers to upgrade, at no additional cost, to the latest technology if new capabilities are introduced during the period that the software assurance is in effect. We determined that the accompanying third-party delivered software assurance is critical or essential to the core functionality of the software licensor because we do not sell the software license and standard warranty on a standalone basis (which indicates that the customer cannot benefit from the software license and standard warranty on its own), the software license and the standard warranty are not separately identifiable, the software license assurance warranty are inputs of a combined item in the contract, the assurance warranty and software license are highly interdependent and interrelated because the core functionality of the license is dependent on the assurance warranty, and our promise to provide the assurance warranty that is necessary for the software license to continue to provide significant benefit to the customer. As a result, the software license and the accompanying third party delivered software assurance are recognized as a single performance obligation.

We leverage drop-ship shipments with many of our partners and suppliers to deliver hardware and consumable products to our clients without having to physically hold the inventory at our warehouses, thereby increasing efficiency and reducing costs. We recognize revenue for drop-ship arrangements on a gross basis as the principal in the transaction when the product is received by the client because we control the product prior to transfer to the client. We also assume primary responsibility for the fulfillment in the arrangement, we assume inventory risk if the product is returned by the client, we set the price of the product charged to the client, we assume credit risk for nonpayment by our customer, and we work closely with clients to determine their hardware specifications.

Professional services - We provide professional services which include consulting, staging, deployment, installation, repair and customer specified software customization. The arrangement is based on either a time and material basis or a fixed fee. For our time and materials service contracts, we recognize revenues as those services are provided and consumed, as this is the best output measure of how the services are transferred to the customer. Fixed fee contracts are recognized in the period in which the services are performed or delivered using a proportional performance service model. Revenue is recognized on a gross basis in the period in which the services are performed or delivered.

Maintenance services - We sell certain Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) hardware and software maintenance support arrangements to our clients. We also offer an internal maintenance agreement related to hardware. These contracts are support service agreements for the hardware and/or software products that were acquired from us and others. Although these are third-party support agreements for maintenance on the specific hardware and/or software products, our internal help desk and systems engineers assist customers by providing technical assistance on the source of or how to fix the problem. In addition, we also provide a turn back feature, deploying replacements as needed while we manage the return and reverse logistics of the product back to the OEM. Revenue related to service contracts is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement, generally over one to three years.

We act as the principal in the transaction as the primary obligor for fulfillment in the arrangement, we set the price of the service charged to the customer, and we assume credit risk for the amounts invoiced. In addition, we manage back-end warranties, service contracts and repairs for multiple products and suppliers. We leverage our knowledge base of mobility best practices by consolidating multiple suppliers’ supplier’s maintenance requirements under a single point in contact through us. Our internal support team assists our customers first by performing an initial technical triage to determine the source of the problem including, but not limited to, physical damage and software issues and whether they can be handled remotely by the client or returned for repair. Further, we receive the returned products, confirm that the equipment is operational or not, either repair or refurbish the equipment internally or return it to the manufacturer directly to repair. We then obtain the product turn back from the manufacturer and either send it back out to a specific customer location or place in a customer’s spare pool. As a result, we recognize the revenue on a gross basis.

We defer costs to acquire contracts, including commissions, incentives and payroll taxes if they are incremental and recoverable costs of obtaining a customer contract with a term exceeding one year. Deferred contract costs are amortized to sales and marketing expense over the contract term, generally over one to three years. We have elected to recognize the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a term of less than one year as a selling expense when incurred. We include deferred contract acquisition costs in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” in the consolidated balance sheets.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are stated at net realizable value, and as such, earnings are charged with a provision for doubtful accounts based on our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable. We determine an allowance based on historical write-off experience and specific account information available. When internal collection efforts on accounts have been exhausted, the accounts are written off by reducing the allowance for doubtful accounts and the related customer receivable.

41

Stock-based

Intangible Assets and Long-lived Assets

We evaluate our intangible and long-lived assets for impairment when events or circumstances arise that indicate intangible and long-lived assets may be impaired. Indicators of impairment include, but are not limited to, a significant deterioration in overall economic conditions, a decline in the market capitalization, the loss of significant business, or other significant adverse changes in industry or market conditions. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives using an accelerated method to their estimated residual values, if any.  Our intangible assets consist of customer lists, customer relationships and trade names.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but tested for impairment at least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that carrying values may not be recoverable. We assess the impairment of goodwill annually at each year-end and if indicators of impairment are present.

Factors that we consider important that could trigger an impairment assessment include, but not limited to, the following:

significant under-performance relative to historical and projected operating results;
significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or business strategy; and
significant negative industry or general economic trends.

When performing the impairment review, we determine the carrying amount of a reporting unit by assigning assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill, to each reporting unit. To evaluate whether goodwill is impaired, we compare the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to which the goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit’s carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the amount of the impairment loss will be recognized as the difference of the estimated fair value and the carrying value of the reporting unit under the new accounting standard.

Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature and involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue and expense growth rates, capital expenditures and the depreciation and amortization related to capital expenditures, changes in working capital, discount rates, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic and market conditions and the determination of appropriate comparable companies. Due to the inherent uncertainty involved in making these estimates, actual future results related to assumed variables could differ from these estimates.

Business Combinations

We utilize the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations and allocate the purchase price of an acquisition to the various tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. We primarily establish fair value using the income approach based upon a discounted cash flow model. The income approach requires the use of many assumptions and estimates including future revenues and expenses, as well as discount factors and income tax rates. Other estimates include:

Estimated step-ups or write-downs for fixed assets and inventory;
Estimated fair values of intangible assets; and
Estimated liabilities assumed from the target

While we use our best estimates and assumptions as part of the purchase price allocation process to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the business acquisition date, these estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the purchase price allocation period, which is generally no more than one year from the business acquisition date, we may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Business combinations also require us to estimate the useful life of certain intangible assets that we acquire and this estimate requires significant judgment.

42

Share-Based Compensation

We account for share-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation”. Under ASC 718, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the requiredrequisite service period which is generally equal to(generally the vesting period.  There were no stock option grantsperiod of the equity grant).

Share-based compensation expense recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.


Due to the limited time that the Company’s common stock has been publicly traded, management estimates expected volatilityperiod is based on the averagevalue of the portion of stock-based payment awards that is ultimately expected volatilitiesto vest during the period. Given that stock-based compensation expense recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. We account for forfeitures as they occur, rather than estimate expected forfeitures.

Compensation cost for stock awards, which may include restricted stock units (“RSUs”), is measured at the fair value on the grant date and recognized as expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the related service period. The fair value of stock awards is based on the estimated fair value of our common stock on the grant date.

The estimated fair value of common stock option awards is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model requires subjective assumptions regarding future stock price volatility and expected time to exercise, along with assumptions about the risk-free interest rate and expected dividends, all of which affect the estimated fair values of our common stock option awards. Given a samplinglack of five companies with similar attributes tohistorical stock option exercises, the Company, including: industry, size and financial leverage.  The expected term of options granted is calculated as the awards representsaverage of the weighted vesting period and the contractual expiration date of timethe option. This calculation is based on a method permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission in instances where the vesting and exercise terms of options granted meet certain conditions and where limited historical exercise data is available. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the common stock of comparable public companies that the awards are expected to be outstanding.  Management considered expectations for the future to estimate employee exercise and post-vest termination behavior.  The Company does not intend to pay dividendsoperate in the foreseeable future, and therefore has assumed a dividend yield of zero.  similar industries as us.

43

The risk-free interest rate selected to value any particular grant is the yieldbased on zero-couponthe U.S. Treasury securities for a periodrate that is commensurate withcorresponds to the expected term of the awards.

Employeegrant effective as of the date of the grant. The expected dividend assumption is based on our history and management’s expectation regarding dividend payouts.

Compensation expense for common stock option awards with graded vesting schedules is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the last separately vesting portion of the award, provided that the accumulated cost recognized as of any date at least equals the value of the vested portion of the award.

If there are any modifications or cancellations of the underlying vested or unvested stock-based awards, we may be required to accelerate, increase or cancel any remaining unearned stock-based compensation costsexpense, or record additional expense for vested stock-based awards. Future stock-based compensation expense and unearned stock- based compensation may increase to the extent that we grant additional common stock options or other stock-based awards.

Income Taxes

We utilize the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the consolidated financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the six months ended June 30, 2013year in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.

Under ASC Topic 740, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. Additionally, ASC Topic 740 provides requirements for derecognition, classification, interest and 2012, was $21,000penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and $39,000, respectively,transition. Our policy is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

44

description Of Business

Overview

DecisionPoint, through its subsidiary corporations, is a provider and is included inintegrator of mobility and wireless systems for business organizations. We design, deploy and support mobile computing systems that enable our customers to access employers’ data networks at various locations (i.e. the retail selling generalfloor, nurse workstations, warehouse and administrative expensedistribution centers or on the road deliveries via enterprise-grade handheld computers, printers, tablets, and smart phones). We also develop and integrate data capture equipment including bar code scanners and radio frequency identification (RFID) readers.

Acquisitions have been an important element of our growth strategy and are expected to be in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statementsfuture. We have supplemented our organic growth by identifying, acquiring and integrating businesses that results in broader, more sophisticated product offerings, while diversifying and expanding our customer base and markets. For example, much of operations.our revenue growth in 2019 was fueled by the acquisition and integration of RDS, a provider of innovative enterprise solutions, in June of 2018 and our increased focus on developing a complete managed services portfolio. RDS has expanded our product portfolio with mission critical printers, consumables and custom labels and a wide array of on-site professional services. Additionally, RDS has provided new opportunities in healthcare which is incremental to our existing markets of Retail and Logistics. In December 2020, we acquired ExtenData Solutions, LLC (“ExtenData”), an enterprise mobility solutions provider headquartered in the Denver metropolitan area.  ExtenData’s products and services are synergistic and complimentary to those provided by the Company.  The ExtenData acquisition is intended to enhance and supplement the products and services offered by the Company and broaden our customer base.

In early 2016, we elected to file a Form 15 with the SEC to voluntarily deregister our common stock and suspend our obligation to file periodic reports. This was due to the limited number of record holders of our common stock at that time and because our common stock was thinly traded.  By filing the Form 15 the Company was also able to reduce significant expenses associated with compliance efforts, professional fees and other administrative costs.

Our Story

DecisionPoint enables its clients to “move decisions closer to the customer” by “empowering the mobile worker”. We define the “mobile worker” as those individuals who are on the front line in direct contact with customers. These workers include field repair technicians, sales associates, healthcare providers, couriers, public safety employees and millions of other workers that deliver goods and or services throughout the country. Whether they are blue or white collar, mobile workers have many characteristics in common.  Mobile workers need information, access to corporate resources, decision support tools and the ability to capture information and report it back to the organization.

DecisionPoint empowers these mobile workers through the implementation of various mobile technologies including specialized mobile business applications, wireless networks, mobile computers variety of consumer and rugged mobile computing devices. We also provide a comprehensive managed services portfolio that includes consulting, integration, project management, software development, deployment, and Life Cycle Management services. Those services include configuration, repair services, help desk, and implementation services helping our Enterprise customers operationalize their mobile investments. DecisionPoint provides 24/7/365 asset visibility to our customers mobile estate through our OnPoint Services Hub – an asset management portal.

At DecisionPoint, we attempt to deliver to our customers the ability to make better, faster and more accurate business decisions by implementing industry-specific, enterprise wireless, scanning, RFID and mobile computing systems for their front-line mobile workers, inside and outside of the traditional workplace. Our solutions are designed to unlock mission critical information and deliver it to employees when needed regardless of their location.  As a result, our customers are able to move their business decision points closer to their customers: improving customer service levels, reducing costs and accelerating business growth.

Mobility solutions and usage, in general, continue to grow and change rapidly.  Many companies are leveraging mobile solutions to deliver information to their associates and customers in new and innovative ways that create competitive differentiation. Rapid change and innovation lead to increasingly complex solutions and requirements. Internal IT staff can be overwhelmed by the complexity of June 30, 2013, total unrecognized estimated employee compensation cost relatedmanaging and operationalizing these mobile solutions. DecisionPoint seeks to stock options granted prioreliminate this complexity through our managed services offerings to that date was $120,000 whichallow our customers to focus their resources on business transformation and bottom-line results.  

45

A comprehensive mobile solution requires close coordination with many suppliers such as OEM manufacturers, carriers, security organizations, software providers and others.

We have developed an ‘ecosystem’ of partners to support the assembly and manufacturing provisions of our custom and off-the-shelf solutions. These partners include Hand Held Device Manufacturers (OEM’s): Zebra, Honeywell, Apple, Samsung, Panasonic, Datalogic, Verifone, Ingenico, Infinite Peripherals and others. Independent Software Vendors (ISV’s): BlueFletch, Syft and Kutir Mobile Device Management Providers (MDM): VMware (AirWatch), Soti, Ivanti and others. Wireless Carriers: AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile. Wireless LAN Manufacturers: Cisco, Extreme Networks, Aruba, and others.

DecisionPoint has offices throughout North America with service centers located on both the East and West Coast allowing us to serve multi-location clients and their mobile workforces.

Our Markets and Primary Customer Industries

DecisionPoint is a mobile systems integrator providing enterprise mobility solutions to the retail, logistics and healthcare markets. These solutions span the complete technology life cycle from systems design and implementation capabilities to a complete portfolio of support services including repair center services and managed mobile services.

Opportunity Analysis

Among technology segments, mobility, Managed Services and IoT represent large, potential growth markets. We believe this combined with investments in productivity enhancing technologies in the mobile space present a strong opportunity for growth. Our investments in the key technologies intended to support managed mobile services are critical to our future.

The trends in investment combined with changes in technology are expected to drive customers to meet competitive needs as well as IT requirements. The anticipated end-of-life of the Microsoft Windows Mobile operating system, effective in 2020, is expected to be recognizedrequire most customers in our key markets to replace or upgrade nearly 100% of the mobile computers over the next three years. We believe this trend provides a weighted-average vesting period of 2.94 years.

NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leases - The Company leases its facilitiespotential on-going growth opportunity for the Company.

DecisionPoint has experience in this space and certain equipment under various operating leases which expire at various dates through fiscal 2018has written custom applications as well as partnered with some well-known software companies in the industry. Key ISV relationships forged with Bluefletch, Syft, and requireKutir enable us to payoffer a portioncloud-based mobile application suite, designed to address this large and present opportunity.

46

Market Focus

Retail In-Store Operations

We assist retail customers in selecting the correct technology, deploying it and the managing that technology for its entire life cycle. Our OnPoint asset management system helps our retail customers with far-flung stores manage repairs, returns and every facet of the related operating expenseslife of the device. This allows our customers IT resources to be leveraged for competitive advantage as we take care of this critical function. We brought Zebra mobile computers into our technical support center and configured each device to the precise specifications for that retailer including software applications, device settings, mobile device management (MDM), and network specific settings. Devices were combined with the accessories needed to complete the implementation, making the project easy to deploy on the store floor.

Warehousing and Distribution

DecisionPoint has experience helping large retailers, warehouses and third-party logistics providers ensure their logistics operations are modern, efficient and provides them with a competitive advantage. We work closely with our customers to select the right technology in a rapidly changing world intended to give them return on investment throughout its lifetime of deployment. Applications such as Yard Management, Receiving, Picking, Voice, Hands-Free, and Voice are all components of a system that provide value. DecisionPoint assists our customers to manage the largest of projects with flawless execution along with the lifecycle management services that keep those IT assets operational.

Healthcare

Through the acquisition of RDS, DecisionPoint expanded its presence in healthcare. RDS has provided hardware, integration, IT Services, and a myriad of healthcare solutions to one of the largest systems in the country for 25+ years supporting clinical workflows throughout the healthcare systems. DecisionPoint currently provides service on-site for more than 30,000 IT assets, such as Barcode printers and scanners. That expertise combined with our account base of healthcare systems and healthcare manufacturing makes this vertical our second largest and represents opportunity for growth in 2020 and beyond. Continuous investment in new systems and capabilities provides DecisionPoint with potentially significant opportunity via account expansion and new account acquisition, including the repair services we are providing to so many of our key customers in all verticals.

Field Sales/Service

In 2019 and 2020, DecisionPoint has and expects to roll-out a new tablet system for the field representatives of Mission Linen Supply. DecisionPoint co-developed the software hand-in-hand with Mission Linen Supply’s operations team that will dramatically improve the efficiencies of the Field reps and make it easier for them to record deliveries, pick-ups and transact sales on the spot. This has been a multi-year project now in its second lifetime, which continues to evolve and improve their competitive position. We are committed to our customers and their success. The field sales/service market is experiencing significant growth. This space has evolved and moved from Rugged to Consumer technologies in many instances. As a result, DecisionPoint intends to leverage our experience to expand our offerings and options for our customers no matter how technology may change and evolve. DecisionPoint intends to provide its complete line of services, including custom or packaged software solutions to these markets, representing another area of potential growth.

47

FOCUS ON SERVICES

Lifecycle Management

DecisionPoint seeks to focus on the services intended to help our customers maximize the life of their IT assets. When OEM’s discontinue a product or provide poor service on an aging product it can force our customers into an upgrade, they may not be ready to manage or afford. We work closely with our customers in all verticals to attempt to provide them that extra value at the end of an asset’s lifecycle.

Deployment and Project Management

Project management and deployment services are also an area of focus and growth. DecisionPoint’s project management team has handled nationwide retail point of sale deployments and a myriad of other projects that augment our customers IT teams. The same applies to healthcare where we have the expertise to understand clinical workflows and how an IT implementation needs to be executed with a keen eye for detail and a precise execution of the SOW’s we commit to execute.

Managed Services

DecisionPoint offers a comprehensive product portfolio of managed services designed to simplify the complexity associated with designing, deploying and managing a mobile solution. Each product service is defined by specific deliverables and reporting requirements.

The product portfolio includes:

Consulting – Solution Design & Business Process Review
Technology Acquisition
Project Management
Software Integration and Development
Deployment (depot and on-site)
Repair Services (depot and on-site)
Service Desk (tier 2 technical support
Reverse logistics & End of Life (EOL) disposal services
OnPoint Services Hub (24x7x365 Asset Management Portal)

Customers can acquire our product service SKU’s a-la-carte or in a complete services bundle.

48

Customers receive real-time asset management and tracking information through DecisionPoint’s OnPoint™ Service Hub, an internally created customer service portal that provides our customers with a 24/7 view of their technology assets being managed by DecisionPoint.

As a Service

DecisionPoint also offers “as a service models” that include devices, services, software and consulting in one monthly recurring charge.

Software

Unlike the market for standardized business software such as email or accounting, the market for enterprise mobile software is more specialized. Enterprise mobile software systems must support industry-specific and customer-specific business processes. For this reason, we utilize several avenues to provide mobile software solutions to meet our customers’ unique requirements.

Resold specialized ISV applications:  The software produced by specialized ISVs is designed to fit a particular vertical market and application. Even still, it must be tailored to meet the needs of each customer and often requires integration to the customer’s enterprise system(s). Depending on the requirements, this tailoring is provided by DecisionPoint under contract with DecisionPoint. 

DecisionPoint custom development: When one of our off-the-shelf solutions or other ISV solution is not available, custom software can be created in-house using standardized programming platforms like the Microsoft.NET® framework, Java™, Android and Apple iOS. These are used when there is simply no other “off-the-shelf” way to meet the customer’s requirements or when a client believes their business requirements are so unique that only a custom solution will work. An increasingly popular requirement for many corporate clients, which we are able to fulfill, is a custom application that is written once, but supports multiple mobile operating systems.

Customers

We value the relationship we have with our customers and understand the need for partners who add value to their businesses. We focus on key operational elements intended to resonate with our customers business needs, creating long term relationships that are the Company’s life blood.

In 2019, two of our customers, Kaiser Permanente and Pitney Bowes accounted for approximately 24% and 11% of our net sales, respectively. No other single customer in 2019 accounted for more than 10% of net sales.  All (or substantially all) Company customers order products and services from the Company on a purchase order basis with purchase terms that may vary by purchase order.  In addition, with respect to Kaiser Permanente, certain terms of our relationship are governed by a Master Services and Products Agreement that provides that the fees and prices charged by the Company are subject to a formula that limits the maximum amount that Kaiser Permanente may be charged.  No arrangement between the Company and any customer, including Pitney Bowes and Kaiser Permanente, provide for minimum amount of products or services that must be purchased by the customer nor require any customer to exclusively utilize the Company as a provider.

Competition

The automatic identification and data capture (AIDC) business is one that is highly fragmented and covered by many competitors that range from a one-man shop to multi-billion-dollar companies. DecisionPoint attempts to separate itself from the competition with our expertise and ability to help a customer manage an entire project vs. buying a product. Many competitors in this space compete on-line at low margins. We work closely with our strategic partners and believe we receive best in class discounts, rebates, and support due to the value we present to the customer.

49

The following companies are examples of competitors in the AIDC Industry:

CDW – CDW provides thousands of products as a general IT supplier.
Denali Advanced Integration – Washington-based Denali Advanced Integration is a full system integration company with services ranging from IT Consulting, Managed Services and Enterprise Mobility Solutions.
Other Competitors in the U.S. – Certain ‘catalog and online’ AIDC equipment resellers offer end-users deeply discounted, commodity-oriented products; however, they typically offer limited or no maintenance support beyond the manufacturer’s warranty (which generally results in slower repair turnaround time). More importantly, as end users have become increasingly dependent on VARs and Sis to provide platform design, integration and maintenance, end users typically do not place major purchase orders with such resellers.

Intellectual Property

We own and maintain a portfolio of intellectual property taxes,assets which we hope to continue to build. We believe that our intellectual property assets create great value to the Company and insurance. therefore we take steps to protect those assets. However, because of the nature of our business and assets we have not sought patent or trademark protection of our intellectual property assets.

Employees

As of January 11, 2021, we had a total of approximately 110 full-time employees. We have not experienced any work disruptions or stoppages and we consider relations with our employees to be good.

Legal Proceedings; Product Liability

From time to time, we may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. Currently, we are not a party to any material legal proceedings or subject to any material claims. The results of any future litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources, and other factors.

ExtenData Solutions, LLC Acquisition

On December 4, 2020, the Company entered into a Membership Unit Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) and concurrently therewith closed upon the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of ExtenData Solutions, LLC (“ExtenData”). As a result of the acquisition, ExtenData became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. ExtenData is focused on enterprise mobility solutions and that provides software product development, mobile computing, identification and tracking solutions, and wireless tracking solutions. 

The purchase price for the acquisition was $4,250,000, subject to certain adjustments such as potential deductions for indebtedness and other transaction related expenses and bonuses. In addition, subject to the financial performance of ExtenData in each of the two years following closing, the Company may pay the sellers a total of up to an additional $750,000 in earn out payments. Of the purchase price, $500,000 was delivered into escrow at the closing to, among other things, cover any losses for which the sellers may be obligated to indemnify the Company. The Purchase Agreement imposes additional obligations on the parties, including restrictive covenants that are applicable to the sellers.

The Purchase Agreement contains customary representations and warranties as well as covenants by each of the sellers and the Company. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, each of the Company, on the one hand, and sellers, on the other hand (on an individual basis), agreed to indemnify the other for breaches or inaccuracies of its representations, warranties, and covenants as well as for certain other specified matters, subject to certain limitations set forth in the Purchase Agreement. The representations and warranties in the Purchase Agreement are the product of negotiation among the parties to the Purchase Agreement and are for the sole benefit of such parties. In some instances, the representations and warranties in the Purchase Agreement may represent an allocation among the parties of risk associated with particular matters, and the assertions embodied in those representations and warranties are qualified by information disclosed by one party to the other in connection with the execution of the Purchase Agreement. Consequently, persons other than the parties to the Purchase Agreement may not rely upon the representations and warranties in the Purchase Agreement as characterizations of actual facts or circumstances as of the date of the Purchase Agreement or as of any other date.

The acquisition will be deemed a significant acquisition under the requirements of Regulation S-X. As such, required financial statements and pro forma financial information relating to ExtenData will be publicly filed by the Company as required by Regulation S-X and other applicable SEC rules.

Available Information

Our annual and quarterly reports that we will begin to file, along with all other reports and amendments filed with or furnished to the SEC, will be publicly available free of charge on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.decisionpt.com as soon as reasonably practicable after these materials are filed with or furnished to the SEC.  Our corporate governance policies, ethics code and board of directors’ committee charters are posted under the Investor Relations section of the website.  The information on our website is not part of this prospectus or any report we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.  The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is www.sec.gov.

50

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

Our company headquarters and executive offices are located in Irvine, California, where we lease approximately 10,000 square feet.

We believe that our facilities are adequate for our current needs.

MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Our stock is quoted on the OTC Pink Market under the symbol “DPSI.”  We were previously quoted over-the-counter until early 2018. There are 13,576,223 shares of our Common Stock outstanding. The information regarding public transactions involving our Common Stock reflects prices between dealers, and does not include retail markup, markdown, or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

As of January 11, 2021, the last reported sale price of our Common Stock was $2.55 per share, as quoted on OTC Pink Market.

The Securities Enforcement and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990 requires additional disclosure relating to the market for penny stocks in connection with trades in any stock defined as a penny stock. The SEC has adopted regulations that generally define a penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to a few exceptions which we do not meet. Unless an exception is available, the regulations require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith.

There are currently 917,963 outstanding options and 1,147,548 outstanding warrants exercisable to purchase our common stock. We do not have any convertible debentures outstanding that permit the holder to convert the outstanding obligation into shares of our common stock.

The number of holders of record of shares of our common stock is approximately 330.

There have been no cash dividends declared on our common stock. Dividends are declared at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors, subject to certain restrictions.

We currently have in place an equity compensation plan. A total of 2,200,000 shares of Common Stock are authorized for issuance under the amended 2014 Plan. The 2014 Plan provides that the Company may grant or award to eligible recipients various forms of equity compensation awards, including incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock bonus awards and other performance compensation. As of the date of this prospectus, there are 917,963 outstanding options to purchase shares of our common stock pursuant to the 2014 Plan. 1,232,118 shares of our common stock remain available for future grant or issuance under the 2014 Plan.

Substantially all of our outstanding shares of common stock, including all of the outstanding shares being registered hereby, are restricted or held by affiliates. These shares may be resold publicly in the United States only if they are subject to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act or pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirement such as that provided by Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act. In general, a person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) who at the time of a sale is not, and has not been during the three months preceding the sale, an affiliate of ours and has beneficially owned our restricted securities for at least six months may be entitled to sell the restricted securities without registration under the Securities Act, subject only to the availability of current public information about us, and will be entitled to sell restricted securities beneficially owned for at least one year without restriction. Persons who are our affiliates and have beneficially owned our restricted securities for at least six months may sell a number of restricted securities within any three-month period that does not exceed 1% of the then outstanding common shares of the same class. Sales by our affiliates under Rule 144 are also subject to certain requirements relating to manner of sale, notice and the availability of current public information about us. We cannot estimate the number of shares of our Common Stock that our existing stockholders will elect to sell under Rule 144.

51

Management

The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of our executive officers, key employees and directors as of the date of this prospectus.

Name

AgePosition
Steve Smith65Chief Executive Officer and Director
Melinda Wohl49Vice President, Finance and Administration
Dave Peddemors50Vice President, Sales and Marketing
Robert Schroeder (1)(2)(3)54Director
Stanley Jaworski (2)(3)70Director and Chairman of the Board
Richard Bravman65Director
Michael Taglich (2)(3)55Director
John Guttilla (1)64Director

(1)Member of the audit committee.

(2)Member of the compensation committee.

(3)Member of the nominating and corporate governance committee.

Executive Officers

Steve Smith, Chief Executive Officer and Director. Mr. Smith has been serving as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and as a director since April 11, 2016. Mr. Smith began his focus on the automatic identification and data capture industry in 1991, when he joined Ericsson Communications as Director of Sales and Marketing, with responsibilities over a pioneering mobile computing product there and has held leadership roles at various organizations. Prior to joining DecisionPoint, from 2011 until April 2016 Mr. Smith served as Sales Director – Global Accounts for Zebra Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: ZBRA) a company focused on manufacturing, selling, marketing, tracking and computer printing technologies. Prior to Zebra Technologies Corporation from May 2009 until October 2014 Mr. Smith served as a Sales Director at Motorola Solutions where he was a part of the Enterprise Mobility Division that provides advanced data capture, wireless voice and data and field mobility solutions to a broad range of retail, transportation and logistics and government customers. In addition to his positions at Zebra Technologies Corporation and Motorola previously held leadership positions at other organizations, including serving as Sr. Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Services at Intelleflex, a Silicon Valley-based company delivering innovative solutions around radio frequency identification technologies. Mr. Smith received a Bachelor’s of Science from Long Island University.

Melinda Wohl, Vice President, Finance and Administration. Ms. Wohl is the Company’s Vice President, Finance and Administration and has served in that role since 2008.  She has over 20 years of accounting experience in the technology industry and joined DecisionPoint in 2004. In her current position Ms. Wohl is responsible for all aspects of Accounting, Finance, Human Resources and Payroll from the Company’s headquarters in Irvine, California.   Prior to working for DecisionPoint, Ms. Wohl served as Corporate Controller for Abracon Corporation, a leading global manufacturer of electronic components. Ms. Wohl graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree with an emphasis in Finance from California State University Fullerton.

David Peddemors, Vice President, Sales and Marketing. David Peddemors is the Vice President, Sales and Marketing. David joined DecisionPoint in May of 2019 and his positions is focused on growing sales and marketing efforts. Prior to joining DecisionPoint, starting in 2012 Mr. Peddemors held various positions at Zebra Technologies Corporation where from June 2017 to his departure he served as a Senior Account Manager – Healthcare at Zebra Technologies Corporation where he was responsible for assisting major hospital systems in workflow automation. While at Zebra Technologies Corporation Mr. Peddemors has served in the role of Senior Alliances Manager, Healthcare where he was responsible for developing and managing relationships with major independent software vendors and integration firms focused on the Healthcare space; and also as a Senior Account Manager where he was responsible for major accounts in the manufacturing and field services arena. Prior to his tenure at Zebra Technologies Corporation Mr. Peddemors worked at Blue Dot Solutions (2011 – 2012) and at Psion Teklogix. Mr. Peddemors received a Bachelor’s of Business Administration from the University of Cincinnati.

52

Directors

Stanley Jaworski, Director and Chairman of the Board. Stanley P. Jaworski, Jr. became a director October 3, 2014. He has served as Chairman since February 2016. Mr. Jaworski is VP Marketing for the Comodo Group, an internet security company that he joined in 2014. Prior to Comodo Group, Mr. Jaworski served as Vice President Marketing for the Americas of Motorola Solutions, Inc. (NYSE:MSI) from 2009 until May 2014. From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Jaworski was Chief Marketing Officer of VBrick Systems, Inc., which provides enterprise Internet protocol video solutions for corporate, education, worship, media and government markets worldwide, and from 2005 to 2007, he was Vice President, Worldwide Channel Marketing, of NetApp, Inc., a computer storage and data management company.

Richard Bravman, Director. Richard Bravman became a director on February 24, 2016. Mr. Bravman is an entrepreneurial leader with over 40 years of functional, general management, and board level experience in technology companies ranging in scale from start-up to global S&P 500 public companies, and across the growth stages in between. Since 2013 Mr. Bravman has served as Chief Strategy Officer of Affinity Solutions, an industry leader in precision marketing platform solutions. He also is a strategic advisor for TrustWrx, a cybersecurity company, and is the principal of Coastal Ventures, a firm he founded in 2004 that provides strategic consulting and board services to the executive management of emerging and early stage technology companies, and to their investors. Mr. Bravman spent the first 25 years of his career in a variety of roles at Symbol Technologies (recently acquired by Zebra Systems). He joined in 1978 as its fifth employee, held numerous positions with increasing responsibilities, and most recently served as the company’s vice chairman and CEO.

Michael Taglich, Director. Mr. Taglich has served as a director since October 2014. Mr. Taglich has been President of Taglich Brothers, Inc., since its founding in 1992. Taglich Brothers is a New York-based full-service securities brokerage firm specializing in the micro-cap segment of the public securities markets. He is currently the Chairman of the Board of Air Industries Group Inc., a publicly traded aerospace and defense company (NYSE AIRI). He also serves on the board of BioVentrix, Inc., a privately held medical device company whose products are directed at heart failure treatment. He also serves as a director on a number of other public and private companies, including Bridgeline Digital, Inc. (NASDAQ BLIN) and privately held Icagen Inc., a drug screening company. Mr. Taglich brings extensive professional experience which spans various aspects of senior management, including finance, operations and strategic planning. Mr. Taglich received a Bachelor’s Degree in Business Administration from New York University.

John Guttilla, Director. John Guttilla became a director on October 3, 2014. He is a Partner in the accounting firm of RotenbergMeril, a firm he first joined in 1988, and where he currently is a member of the firm’s management committee and director of the firm’s Financial Services Department. He is also a director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Orchids Paper Products Company (formerly NYSE MKT: TIS). Mr. Guttilla is a certified public accountant and holds a B.S. degree in Accounting from Fordham University and a Master’s in Taxation from St. John’s University.

Robert Schroeder, Director. Mr. Schroeder was elected to the Board of Directors on November 18, 2013. Mr. Schroeder served as Chairman of the Board from October 2014 until February 2016. He currently serves as the Vice President of Investment Banking of Taglich Brothers and specializes in advisory services and capital raising for small public and private companies. Prior to that, at Taglich Brothers Mr. Schroeder served as Senior Equity Analyst publishing sell-side research on publicly traded companies. Mr. Schroeder has been with Taglich Brothers since 1993. Prior to joining Taglich, Mr. Schroeder served in various positions in the brokerage and public accounting industries. Mr. Schroeder received a B.S. degree in accounting and economics from New York University. He currently serves on the board of directors of Air Industries Group (AIRI; NYSE AMERICAN) , a manufacturer of aerospace parts and assemblies and Akers BioSciences, Inc. (AKER; NASDAQ, a developer of rapid health information technologies. He also currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of publicly traded Intellinetics, Inc. (INLX; OTCQB), a provider of cloud-based enterprise content management solutions.

53

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is applicable to DecisionPoint and to all our directors and officers and persons performing similar functions, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer. A copy of the Company’s Code of Ethics may be obtained on our website at decisionpt.com/code-of-business-ethics/. We intend to disclose future amendments to such code, or any waivers of its requirements, applicable to any principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions or our directors on our website identified above. The inclusion of our website address in this prospectus does not include or incorporate by reference the information on our website into this prospectus.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

We have a Board leadership structure whereby the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are separate. We believe this structure provides the Board with independent leadership and oversight of management and allows the Chief Executive Officer to concentrate on the Company’s business operations.

Our Board is comprised of six directors, five of whom we consider independent directors. All of our independent directors are highly accomplished and experienced business leaders in their respective fields, who have demonstrated leadership in significant enterprises and are familiar with board processes. We believe the current Board leadership structure facilitates effective communication, oversight and governance of the Company consistent with the best interests of the Company’s shareholders and other stakeholders.

The Board has delegated responsibility for the oversight of specific risks to Board committees as follows:

The Audit Committee oversees our risk policies and processes relating to the financial statements and financial reporting processes, as well as key credit risks, liquidity risks, market risks and compliance, and the guidelines, policies and processes for monitoring and mitigating those risks.
The Compensation Committee oversees the compensation of our chief executive officer and our other executive officers and reviews our overall compensation policies for employees.
The Nominating and Corporate Committee oversees the nomination of candidates to the Board and risks related to our governance structure and processes.

Director Independence

We are not currently listed on a national securities exchange or in an inter-dealer quotation system that has requirements that a majority of the Board be independent. However, our Board has undertaken a review of the independence of the directors and considered whether any director has a material changesrelationship with us that could compromise his ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out his or her responsibilities. As a result of this review, our Board has determined that Messrs. Schroeder, Guttilla, Jaworski, Bravman and Taglich are “independent directors” as defined under the Listing Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our Board has established an audit committee, a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee. The composition and responsibilities of each of the committees of our Board is described below. Members will serve on these committees until their resignation or until as otherwise determined by our board of directors.

54

Audit Committee

Our audit committee is composed of Messrs. Schroeder and Guttilla. Mr. Guttilla serves as the chairperson of our audit committee.  Our Board has determined that each member of our audit committee meets the requirements for independence and financial literacy under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the Listing Rules of Nasdaq. Our Board has also determined that Mr. Guttilla is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in the rules of the SEC and has the requisite financial sophistication as defined under the Listing Rules of Nasdaq. The responsibilities of our audit committee will include, among other things:

selecting and hiring the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements;
overseeing the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm and taking those actions as it deems necessary to satisfy itself that the accountants are independent of management;
reviewing financial statements and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our annual audited and quarterly financial statements, the results of the independent audit and the quarterly reviews, and the reports and certifications regarding internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls;
preparing the audit committee report that the SEC requires to be included in our annual proxy statement;
reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures;
overseeing our policies on risk assessment and risk management;
reviewing related party transactions; and
approving or, as required, pre-approving, all audit and all permissible non-audit services and fees to be performed by the independent registered public accounting firm.

Our audit committee operates under a written charter, which satisfies the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the Listing Rules of Nasdaq.

Compensation Committee

Our compensation committee is composed of Messrs. Jaworski, Schroeder and Taglich. Mr. Schroeder serves as the chairperson of our compensation committee. Our Board has determined that each member of our compensation committee meets the requirements for independence under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and listing standards of Nasdaq. Each member of the compensation committee is a non-employee director, as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. The purpose of our compensation committee will be to oversee our compensation policies, plans and benefit programs and to discharge the responsibilities of our Board relating to compensation of our executive officers. The responsibilities of our compensation committee will include, among other things:

reviewing and approving or recommending to the Board for approval compensation of our executive officers and directors;
overseeing our overall compensation philosophy and compensation policies, plans and benefit programs for service providers, including our executive officers;
reviewing, approving and making recommendations to our Board regarding incentive compensation and equity plans; and
administering our equity compensation plans.

Our compensation committee will operate under a written charter, to be effective prior to the completion of this offering, which satisfies the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of Nasdaq.

55

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

The corporate governance and nominating committee are composed of Messrs. Jaworski, Schroeder and Taglich. Mr. Schroeder serves as chairperson of our corporate governance and nominating committee. Our Board has determined that all members of our nominating and corporate governance committee meet the requirements for independence under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and Listing Rules of Nasdaq. The responsibilities of our nominating and corporate governance committee will include, among other things:

identifying, evaluating and selecting, or making recommendations to our Board regarding, nominees for election to our Board and its committees;
evaluating the performance of our Board and of individual directors;
considering and making recommendations to our Board regarding the composition of our Board and its committees; and
developing and making recommendations to our Board regarding corporate governance guidelines and matters.

Our nominating and corporate governance committee will operate under a written charter, to be effective prior to the completion of this offering, which satisfies the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of Nasdaq.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Mr. Guttilla previously served on the Board of Directors of Orchids Paper Products Company. In April 2019, Orchids Paper Products Company and certain of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”). Except for Mr. Guttilla, to our lease arrangementsknowledge, during the six months ended June 30, 2013.  Please refer to Note 14 to the audited consolidated financial statementslast ten years, none of our directors and executive officers has:

Had a bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time.
Been convicted in a criminal proceeding or been subject to a pending criminal proceeding, excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses. 
Been subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities.
Been found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC, or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.
Been the subject to, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reverse, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization, any registered entity, or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between or among any of our directors or executive officers and any other directors or executive officer.

56

Executive and Director Compensation

Our named executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2012, included2019, consisting of our principal executive officer and the next two most highly compensated executive officers, were:

Steve Smith, Chief Executive Officer;

Melinda Wohl, Vice President, Finance and Administration; and
David Peddemors, Vice President, Sales and Marketing.

Summary Compensation Table 

The following table provides information regarding the compensation of our named executive officers during the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. 

Name and Principal Position   Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)(1)
  Stock
Awards
($)(2)
  Option
Awards
($)(3)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(4)
  All
Other
Compensation
($)(5)
  Total
($)
 
Steve Smith 2019  385,417      249,000      90,895   11,200   736,512 
Chief Executive Officer 2018  350,000               11,000   11,000 
Melinda Wohl 2019  174,933            31,850   7,514   214,297 
Vice President of Finance 2018  173,687         7,750      6,951   188,388 
David Peddemors (6) 2019  94,886   88,360      39,500      3,179   225,925 
Vice President of Sales and Marketing                              

(1)Amount reflects a discretionary cash bonus for individual performance.
(2)Amounts reflect the grant date fair value of an unrestricted stock award granted to Mr. Smith in accordance with FASB ASC No. 718.
(3)Amounts reflect the grant date fair value of stock options granted to an officer and in accordance with FASB ASC No. 718.
(4)Amounts represent cash-based incentives.
(5)Amounts represent the Company’s 401(k) match.
(6)Mr. Peddemors was hired in May 2019.

Narrative to Summary Compensation Table

Except for our standard 401(k) plan available to employees, there are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers.  Our directors and executive officers, in the Company’s past have, and in the future may receive stock options or restricted stock at the discretion of our board of directors in the future.  Equity awards or stock options may be granted at the discretion of our board of directors from time to time. Certain executives are eligible for cash-based incentives for performance measures of net sales and EBITDA.

Annual ReportIncentive Cash Bonus

The Compensation Committee approved annual cash bonuses based on Form 10-K filedperformance measures of net sales and EBITDA, or net income before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization.

Minimum, target and maximum performance thresholds were established for each of the performance measures. No bonuses are earned unless the performance exceeds the minimum threshold.

57

The following table shows the performance measure thresholds for each measure in 2019:

  Performance Threshold 
  Minimum  Target  Maximum 
Net sales (in millions) $34.5  $46.5  $61.2 
EBITDA (in millions) $2.0  $2.7  $3.6 

The following table represents the percentage of the respective executive’s base salary that would be earned upon achievement of the applicable performance thresholds.

  Steve Smith  Melinda Wohl 
Minimum  0%  0%
Target  40%  20%
Maximum  80%  40%

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2019:

    Stock Option Awards   
Name Grant Date Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Stock Options
Exercisable
(#)
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Stock Options
Unexercisable
(#)
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
Melinda Wohl 6/18/2018  14,583   10,417   0.50  6/18/2023
  10/27/2016  25,000      0.94  10/27/2021
  6/15/2011  28      1,084.90  6/15/2021
David Peddemors 12/31/2019     50,000   0.83  12/31/2024

Executive Employment Arrangements

On March 25, 2019, we entered into an amended employment agreement with Mr. Smith with respect to his continuing employment with us. The agreement provides a fixed term of employment commencing on April 1, 2019 through March 31, 2022. The employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $400,000 increasing to $410,000 on the first anniversary and $420,000 on the second anniversary of the effective date. Pursuant to the agreement, Mr. Smith is eligible for a cash incentive bonus based on the Company achieving performance measures of sales and EBITDA.

58

In addition, Mr. Smith was granted 700,000 shares of restricted common stock. The shares immediately vested upon grant.

None of the other executive officers have any individual agreements with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2013.

Rent expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, was $348,000 and $194,000, respectively.
Apex Earn Out Obligations - If EBITDA (as uniquely definedCompany.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in the agreement), of Apex for the twelve months ending July 31, 2013 (“2013 EBITDA”), is equal to or less than CDN$2,000,000, Apex shall pay an amount, to its former owners, equal to the product of the 2013 EBITDA multiplied by four less CDN$5,000,000 (“2013 EBITDA Basic Earn-Out Amount”), up to a maximum of CDN$3,000,000. An amount equal to 22.22% of the 2013 EBITDA Basic Earn-Out Amount shall be paid in cash and the balance shall be paid by Apex issuing a subordinated convertible note (the “Note”) (see Note 4).


Control

Under the terms of Mr. Smith’s employment agreement, if the Note, Apex will payCompany terminates Mr. Smith without “cause” or in result of a “change in control”, the principal sum dueCompany agreed to provide a severance payment equal to 12 months of the annual base salary on the Notedate of termination. As of December 31, 2019, potential severance payments upon termination or a change in eightcontrol was $400,000.

None of the other executive officers are entitled to payments in connection with a termination or change in control.

Director Compensation

Our non-employee directors receive an annual cash retainer of $18,000 for their service on our board. In addition, Mr. Jaworski received an additional $23,250 for serving as Chairman of the Board.

Annual service for retainer purposes relates to the approximate 12-month period between annual meetings of our stockholders and all retainers are paid in quarterly payments beginning on January 31, 2014 (“Installment Dates”). Interest from and after August 1, 2013, shallinstallments. A prorated annual retainer will be paid to any person who becomes a member of our board, a committee chair or a member of any committee on a date other than the date of the annual meeting of our stockholders.

The following table sets forth the independent director compensation payments made during the year ended December 31, 2019. None of the directors received equity awards in arrears2019.

NameFees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
Stanley Jaworski41,250
Richard Bravman18,000
John Guttilla18,000
Michael Taglich18,000
Robert Schroeder18,000

59

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions

In connection with the closing of a private placement transaction in June 2018 the Company paid Taglich Brothers, Inc. a fee of $253,400 pursuant to the terms of a placement agent agreement and delivered Taglich Brothers, Inc. a warrant exercisable to acquire 633,600 shares of Company common stock. In October 2018 in connection with a separate private placement transaction the Company paid Taglich Brothers, Inc. a fee of $105,000 pursuant to the terms of a placement agent agreement and delivered Taglich Brothers, Inc. a warrant exercisable to acquire 52,500 shares of Company common stock. Michael Taglich is an officer of Taglich Brothers, Inc., and holds an approximate 50% ownership interest in the firm, and Mr. Taglich served on our Board of Directors in 2018 at the last daytime of each calendar quarter commencing onprivate placement transaction. In addition, Robert Taglich, owns an approximate 50% ownership interest in Taglich Brothers, Inc. and beneficially owns greater than 5% of our outstanding common stock.

The Company utilizes various law firms for legal services, including the law firm of Potters & Della Pietra LLP for certain corporate, transactional and related company legal matters. Since January 31, 2014.1, 2018 the Company has paid fees totaling approximately $510,000 to Potters & Della Pietra LLP.  A partner of that law firm is the brother-in-law of Steve Smith, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.  The interest rate shall be determined as follows:


Company believes the rates charged by, and the fees paid to, Potters & Della Pietra LLP are reasonable market rates. 

Other than the relationships and transactions described above, and the director and executive officer compensation arrangements discussed above in the sections titled “Management” and “Executive Compensation”, there has been no transaction since January 1, 2018, or any currently proposed transaction, in which:

we have been or are to be a participant;
the amount involved exceeded or will exceed the lesser of (i) 9% per annum, calculated and compounded quarterly before November 1, 2014; and

$120,000 or (ii) 11% per annum, calculated and compounded quarterly after October 31, 2014;

F-15

(iii)  except, however, that, if, during the term1% of the Note,average of the Company raises Net Equity Capital (as defined inCompany’s total assets at year-end for the Note) in an amount greaterlast two completed fiscal years; and
any of our directors, executive officers or, to our knowledge, beneficial owners of more than CDN$5,000,0005% of our capital stock, or any immediate family member of or person sharing the household with any of these individuals or entities, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Control by Officers and Directors

Our officers and directors and their affiliates beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately 24.2% of our outstanding common stock as of January 11, 2021. As a result, in certain circumstances, these stockholders acting together may be able to determine matters requiring approval of our stockholders, including the election of our directors, or they may delay, defer or prevent a change in control of us. See the section of this prospectus captioned “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” below.

60

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of January 11, 2021, as adjusted to reflect the sale of common stock offered by us in this offering, for:

each person, or group of affiliated persons, who we know to beneficially own more than five percent (5%) of our common stock;
each of our named executive officers;
each of our directors and this Note is not repaid in full within 30 days from the date that the Company receives such Net Equity Capital, the interest rate otherwise provided in the Note shall be 15% per annum from the enddirector nominees; and
all of such 30-day period to the first anniversary thereofour executive officers and 20% per annum thereafter to the date of payment in full.directors as a group.

The Notepercentage of beneficial ownership information shown in the table prior to this offering is convertible, onlybased on 13,576,223 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 11, 2021 and assumes no participation in this offering by the parties below.

Information with respect to beneficial ownership has been furnished by each Installment Date, atdirector, officer or beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of our common stock. We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the optionrules of the Note holder, intoSEC. These rules generally attribute beneficial ownership of securities to persons who possess sole or shared voting power or investment power with respect to those securities. In addition, the rules include shares of our common stock at a conversion price that is equalissuable pursuant to the greaterexercise of stock options that are either immediately exercisable or exercisable within sixty (60) days of January 11, 2021. These shares are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding those options for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person, but they are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, the persons or entities identified in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community property laws.

Except as otherwise noted below, the address of each of the market priceindividuals and entities named in the table below is c/o DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., 8697 Research Drive, Irvine, CA 92618. Beneficial ownership representing less than 1% is denoted with an asterisk (*).

  Shares of
Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned
  % 
Named Executive Officers and Directors:      
Michael N. Taglich (1)  1,824,140   13.4%
Steven Smith  776,520   5.7%
Robert Schroeder (2)  317,056   2.3%
Richard Bravman (3)  103,941   * 
Stanley P. Jaworski, Jr. (4)  123,941   * 
Melinda Wohl (5)  41,813   * 
John Guttilla (6)  85,613   * 
David Peddemors (7)  8,833   * 
All current directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)  3,281,857   24.2%
         
5% Stockholders        

Robert Taglich (8)

37 Main Street

Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724

  1,043,607   7.7%

*Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding common stock.

(1)Includes: Warrants exercisable to acquire 113,479 shares at $1.03 per share, warrants exercisable to acquire 141,805 shares at $0.50 per share and warrants exercisable to acquire 15,750 shares at $0.70 per share. Also includes options to acquire 35,000 shares of common stock.
(2)Includes: Warrants exercisable to acquire 102,121 shares at $1.03 per share, warrants exercisable to acquire 115,820 shares at $0.50 per share and warrants exercisable to acquire 15,750 shares at $0.70 per share. Also includes options to acquire 35,000 shares of common stock and 53,615 shares of common stock directly owned by Mr. Schroeder.

(3)Consists of options to acquire to purchase 103,941 shares of common stock that may be exercised within 60 days of January 11, 2021.

(4)Consists of options to acquire to purchase 123,941 shares of common stock that may be exercised within 60 days of January 11, 2021.

(5)Includes: 130 shares of common stock and options exercisable to acquire 41,693 shares of common stock.

(6)Consists of options to acquire 35,000 shares of common stock that may be exercised within 60 days of January 11, 2021 and 50,613 shares of common stock.

(7)Consists of options to acquire 6,250 shares of common stock. Does not include options to 43,750 shares of commons stock that are not exercisable within 60 days of January 11, 2021.

(8)Includes: Warrants exercisable to acquire 92,847 shares at $1.03 per share, warrants exercisable to acquire 141,805 shares at $0.50 per share and warrants exercisable to acquire 15,750 shares at $0.70 per share.

61

Legal Matters

The validity of ourthe issuance of the shares of common stock offered hereby will be passed upon for us by Polsinelli PC, Chicago, Illinois.

Experts

The consolidated financial statements of DecisionPoint as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 included in this prospectus have been so included in reliance on the day priorreport of Haskell & White LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

Where You Can Find More Information

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the conversion, or $1.00. The shares issuable underof Common Stock offered by this prospectus. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the Note will be restricted but will have certain piggy back registration rights asstatement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the Purchase Agreement.


Ifregistration statement, some of which is contained in exhibits to the 2013 EBITDA is greater than CDN$2,000,000, Apex shall pay an amount, to its former owners, (the “2013 EBITDA Additional Earn-Out Amount”) by which the dollar-for-dollar 2013 EBITDA exceeds CDN$2,000,000, up to a maximum of CDN$500,000. The 2013 EBITDA Additional Earn-Out shall be paidregistration statement as permitted by the issuance of sharesrules and regulations of the Company’s common stock. The number of sharesSEC. For further information with respect to be issued shall be determined by the amount due divided by the 30 day average daily closing price of the shares of the Company’sus and our common stock, in the month of July 2013. The shares issued will be restricted but will have certain piggy back registration rights as set forth in the Purchase Agreement.

The Company also entered into an employment agreement with Donald Dalicandro, the Chief Executive Officer of Apex, as a result of the Apex acquisition. Under the employment agreement, the Company further agreed Mr. Dalicandro would be appointedwe refer you to the Company’s board of directors effective June 4, 2012, and would not be removed fromregistration statement, including the Company’s board of directors during the Earn-Out Period (as defined in the employment agreement) and the Bonus Period (as defined in the employment agreement) except by death, bankruptcy, incapacity or voluntary resignation. The agreement calls for annual bonus upon achieving certain results of operation at Apex for the 12 months ending July 31, 2013, 2014, and 2015.  Such bonuses are considered additional contingent purchase considerationexhibits filed as the Company is obligated to pay the bonus regardless of whether or not his employment is retained (see Note 4).
Apex Escrow Obligation - Asa part of the Apex Purchase Agreement, fromregistration statement. Statements contained in this prospectus concerning the Closing Date up untilcontents of any contract or any other document are not necessarily complete. If a contract or document has been filed as an exhibit to the expiryregistration statement, please see the copy of the bonus period,contract or document that has been filed. Each statement in this prospectus relating to a contract or document filed as an exhibit is qualified in all respects by the Companyfiled exhibit. You may obtain information on the operation of the public reference rooms by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy statements and other information about issuers, like us, that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is obligatedwww.sec.gov.

We will begin to escrow 25%file annual, quarterly and special reports and other information with the SEC. Our filings with the SEC will be available to the public on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Those filings will also be available to the public on, or accessible through, our corporate website at: www.decisionpt.com. You may access these materials free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The information we file with the SEC or contained on or accessible through our corporate website or any Equity Capital raised in excess of $500,000.  The funds in the escrow are to be used to pay the 2013 EBITDA Basic Earn-Out and the 2013 EBITDA Additional Earn-Out and the additional bonus consideration.  In December 2012, the Company raised $7,042,000 asother website that we may maintain is not part of this prospectus or the Series D Purchase Agreement.   These funds have not been placed into escrow pending agreement between the Company and the sellers of Apex regarding the financial institution that will escrow the funds, the amount of funds that are to be placed in escrow and the terms of the escrow agreement itself.


Contingencies - The Company is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business; the outcomeregistration statement of which the Company believes will not havethis prospectus is a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.  These matters are subjectpart.

62

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Index to inherent uncertainties and management’s view of these matters may change in the future.Consolidated Financial Statements

Page
Audited Annual Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-2
Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance SheetsF-3
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive IncomeF-4
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ EquityF-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-7
Unaudited Interim Financial Statements
Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)F-24
Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (unaudited)F-25
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited)F-26
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)F-27
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)F-28

F-1

The Company is subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies, including claims, suits and complaints, arising in the ordinary course of business.  The Company considers the likelihood of loss or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well as its ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies.  An estimated loss contingency is accrued when it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.  The Company regularly evaluates current information available to it to determine whether such accruals should be adjusted and whether new accruals are required.
Under the Company’s bylaws, directors and officers have certain rights to indemnification by the Company against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers.  The Company maintains director and officer insurance, which covers certain liabilities arising from the obligation to indemnify directors and officers and former directors in certain circumstances.  No material indemnification liabilities were accrued at June 30, 2013.
The Company is party to employment agreements with certain of its key executive officers as of June 30, 2013.  The agreements do not provide for any material, out of ordinary course of business provisions or benefits.
Included in the key executive officer agreements is an employment agreement with its Chief Operating Officer.  Pursuant to the agreement, the officer is entitled to an annual bonus calculated pursuant to terms set forth in the agreement. The agreement also contains a severance provision providing up to twelve months of salary in certain situations.

NOTE 12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On August 15, 2013, the Company entered into definitive subscription agreements with accredited investors for the sale of $1,756,400 in gross proceeds (including $200,000 from management and existing shareholders of the company) for 2,927,333 shares of common stock and 1,463,667 warrants.  An initial closing for $1,556,400 was held on August 15, 2013.  The remaining $200,000 is expected to close shortly thereafter.  Each warrant is exercisable at $1.00 per share. The warrants are expected to receive liability accounting treatment under existing technical standards. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $1.3 million from the initial closing, after deducting approximately $259,000 in placement agent’s fees and other offering expenses.
The Company paid the Placement Agent $155,400 in commissions (equal to 10% of the gross proceeds), and issued to the Placement Agent five-year warrants (the “Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase 292,733 shares of our common stock (equal to 10% of the number of shares of common stock underlying the Common Shares sold under the Purchase Agreement) at an exercise price of $0.60 per share. The investors will include certain of our officers, directors and employees, who will purchase an aggregate of $100,000 of common shares. The warrants are expected to receive liability accounting treatment under existing technical standards.
F-16

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Stockholders

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Irvine, California

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. (“the Company”(the “Company”) as of December 31, 20122019 and 2011,2018, and the related consolidated statements of operationsincome and comprehensive loss, stockholders'income, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years then ended.  ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Changes in Accounting Principles

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board, ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, using the modified retrospective approach. In addition, as described in Notes 2 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board, ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, using the modified retrospective approach.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

 We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. OurAs part of our audits, included considerationwe are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit includes

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks.  Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

HASKELL & WHITE LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.

Irvine, California

May 28, 2020

F-2

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except per share data)

  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
ASSETS      
Current assets:      
Cash $2,620  $2,450 
Accounts receivable, net  8,710   8,190 
Inventory, net  3,825   356 
Deferred costs  2,201   1,966 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  268   141 
Total current assets  17,624   13,103 
Operating lease assets  516    
Property and equipment, net  239   140 
Deferred costs, net of current portion  1,258   746 
Deferred tax assets  2,659   2,924 
Intangible assets, net  2,394   3,127 
Goodwill  6,990   6,990 
Other assets, net  19   48 
Total assets $31,699  $27,078 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $10,589  $6,704 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  2,222   2,119 
Deferred revenue  3,630   3,811 
Line of credit  3,177   3,196 
Current portion of debt  144   422 
Due to related parties  124   108 
Current portion of operating lease liabilities  140    
Total current liabilities  20,026   16,360 
Deferred revenue, net of current portion  1,979   1,079 
Long-term debt  390   1,488 
Noncurrent portion of operating lease liabilities  388    
Other     452 
Total liabilities  22,783   19,379 
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 12 and 13)        
Stockholders’ equity:        
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding      
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 50,000 shares authorized; 13,576 and 12,875 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  14   13 
Additional paid-in capital  38,142   37,817 
Accumulated deficit  (29,240)  (30,131)
Total stockholders’ equity  8,916   7,699 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $31,699  $27,078 

See Accompanying Notes to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ BDO USA, LLP
Costa Mesa, California
March 28, 2013
F-17

Audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

F-3

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.

(In thousands, except share and per share data)
  December 31, 
  2012  2011 
ASSETS      
Current assets      
Cash $1,103  $366 
Accounts receivable, net  12,287   13,917 
Other receivable  -   1,476 
Due from related party  202   - 
Inventory, net  811   706 
Deferred costs  3,955   3,469 
Deferred tax assets  48   - 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  302   408 
Total current assets  18,708   20,342 
         
Property and equipment, net  179   99 
Other assets, net  205   175 
Deferred costs, net of current portion  2,124   1,800 
Goodwill  8,571   5,538 
Intangible assets, net  6,023   2,214 
Total assets $35,810  $30,168 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Current liabilities        
Accounts payable $11,080  $8,947 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  2,895   2,505 
Line of credit  3,430   4,024 
Current portion of debt  1,800   1,000 
Due to related parties  1   872 
Accrued earn out consideration  1,186   - 
Unearned revenue  7,409   6,756 
Total current liabilities  27,801   24,104 
         
Long term liabilities        
Unearned revenue, net of current portion  2,883   2,509 
Debt, net of current portion and discount  2,922   970 
Accrued earn out consideration, net of current portion  159   - 
Deferred tax liabilities  1,078   18 
Other long term liabilities  80   60 
Total liabilities  34,923   27,661 
         
Commitments and contingencies  -   - 
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Cumulative Convertible Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares        
authorized, 1,105,155 and 1,816,289 shares issued and outstanding, including        
cumulative and imputed preferred dividends of $361 and $436,        
and with a liquidation preference of  $8,758 and $10,652 at December 31, 2012        
and 2011, respectively  7,370   6,320 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized,        
9,300,439 issued and 9,146,556 outstanding as of December 31, 2012,        
and 8,182,791 shares issued and 8,028,908 outstanding as of December 31, 2011  9   8 
Additional paid-in capital  16,132   14,514 
Treasury stock, 153,883 shares of common stock  (205)  (205)
Accumulated deficit  (21,674)  (17,231)
Unearned ESOP shares  (767)  (899)
Accumulated other comprehensive income  22   - 
Total stockholders’ equity  887   2,507 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $35,810  $30,168 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-18

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Income

(Inin thousands, except share and per share data)

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Net sales:      
Product $31,990  $26,009 
Service  11,899   9,149 
Net sales  43,889   35,158 
Cost of sales:        
Product  25,866   21,614 
Service  7,267   6,287 
Cost of sales  33,133   27,901 
Gross profit  10,756   7,257 
Operating expenses:        
Sales and marketing expense  4,907   3,341 
General and administrative expenses  3,999   3,433 
Total operating expenses  8,906   6,774 
Operating income  1,850   483 
Interest expense  649   391 
Income before income taxes  1,201   92 
Income tax expense (benefit)  310   (3,883)
Net income and comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders $891  $3,975 
Earnings per share attributable to shareholders:        
Basic $0.07  $0.42 
Diluted $0.06  $0.35 
Weighted average common shares outstanding        
Basic  13,415   9,504 
Diluted  15,341   11,328 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

F-4


  Years ended December 31, 
  2012  2011 
       
Net sales $71,501  $58,359 
         
Cost of sales  55,949   46,368 
         
Gross profit  15,552   11,991 
         
Selling, general and administrative expense  18,661   13,597 
         
Operating loss  (3,109)  (1,606)
         
Other expense (income):        
Interest expense  998   1,160 
Loss on debt extinguishment  -   2,665 
Other income, net  (116)  (363)
Total other expense  882   3,462 
         
Loss before income taxes  (3,991)  (5,068)
         
Provision (tax benefit) for income taxes  (125)  100 
         
Net loss  (3,866)  (5,168)
         
Cumulative and imputed preferred stock dividends  (954)  (486)
         
Net loss attributable to common shareholders $(4,820) $(5,654)
         
Net loss per share -        
Basic and diluted $(0.61) $(0.94)
         
Weighted-average shares outstanding -        
Basic and diluted  7,900,693   6,019,900 
         
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax        
Net loss $(3,866) $(5,168)
Foreign currency translation adjustment  22   - 
         
Comprehensive loss $(3,844) $(5,168)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-19

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’Changes in Stockholder’s Equity (Deficit)

(in thousands, except per share data)

  Common Stock  Additional
Paid-in
  Accumulated  Total
Stockholders’
 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity 
Balance at December 31, 2017  6,013  $6  $34,815  $(34,161) $660 
Cumulative-effect adjustment from adoption of ASC 606 (Note 2)           55   55 
Net income           3,975   3,975 
Issuance of common stock in connection with private placement  6,336   6   2,655      2,661 
Issuance of common stock in connection with private placement of subordinated debt  525   1   263      264 
Share-based compensation expense        83      83 
Exercise of stock options  1      1      1 
Balance at December 31, 2018  12,875   13   37,817   (30,131)  7,699 
Net income           891   891 
Common stock issued to officer (Note 10)  700   1         1 
Share-based compensation expense        324      324 
Exercise of stock options  1      1      1 
Balance at December 31, 2019  13,576  $14  $38,142  $(29,240) $8,916 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

F-5

(In thousands)

                            
                         
  
 
Convertible
     Additional        Unearned  
Accumulated
other
  
Total
stockholders’
 
  Preferred stock  Common stock  paid-in  Treasury  Accummulated  ESOP  comprehensive  equity 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  capital  stock  deficit  shares  income  (deficit) 
                               
Balance at December 31, 2010  401  $1,486   5,081  $5  $8,239  $-  $(11,577) $(1,024) $-  $(2,871)
                                         
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   (5,168)  -   -   (5,168)
Reverse recapitalization transaction:                                        
Shares deemed issued to Comamtech       ��                                
 stockholders in exchange for net                                        
 assets contributed  -   -   2,187   2   3,945   -   -   -   -   3,947 
Expenses related to reverse recapitalization  -   -   -   -   (730)  -   -   -   -   (730)
Issuance of common shares for finders fee  -   -   154   -   354   -   -   -   -   354 
Repurchase 153,883 shares of common stock  -   -   -   -   -   (205)  -   -   -   (205)
Employee stock-based compensation  -   -   -   -   200   -   -   -   -   200 
                                         
Common shares issued in connection with Exchange Agreement  1,415   4,529   695   1   2,348   -   -   -   -   6,878 
Common shares issued in exchange for services  -   -   66   -   158   -   -   -   -   158 
Accrued dividends on preferred stock  -   305   -   -   -   -   (486)  -   -   (181)
Principal payment from ESOP  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   125   -   125 
                                         
                                         
Balance at December 31, 2011  1,816   6,320   8,183   8   14,514   (205)  (17,231)  (899)  -   2,507 
                                         
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   (3,866)  -   -   (3,866)
Foreign currency translation adjustment      -   -   -   -   -   -   -   22   22 
Convertible Series C Preferred retired  (1,415)  (4,906)  -   -   -   -   377   -   -   (4,529)
Convertible Series D Preferred sold in private placement,                                        
net of issuance costs  704   5,668   -   -   355   -   -   -   -   6,023 
Shares issued in connection with Illume acquisition  -   -   617   1   697   -   -   -   -   698 
Shares issued in connection with Apex acquisition  -   -   325   -   341   -   -   -   -   341 
Common stock issued as an antidilution adjustment  -   -   175   -   173   -   -   -   -   173 
Employee stock-based compensation  -   -   -   -   52   -   -   -   -   52 
Accrued dividends on preferred stock  -   288   -   -   -   -   (954)  -   -   (666)
Principal payment from ESOP  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   132   -   132 
                                         
                                         
Balance at December 31, 2012  1,105  $7,370   9,300  $9  $16,132  $(205) $(21,674) $(767) $22  $887 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-20


DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.

(Inin thousands)

  December 31, 
  2012  2011 
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net loss $(3,866) $(5,168)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  1,510   560 
Amortization of deferred financing costs and note discount  183   140 
Employee stock-based compensation  52   200 
Non-employee stock-based compensation  514   283 
Non-cash interest expense  -   80 
Loss on debt extinguishment  -   2,269 
Loss on disposal of property and equipment  -   4 
ESOP compensation expense  132   125 
Allowance for doubtful accounts  108   - 
Other income related to collection of note receivable in excess of carrying value  -   (405)
Deferred taxes, net  (256)  73 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets and liabilities acquired:        
Accounts receivable, net  1,801   (1,221)
Due from related parties  147   - 
Inventory, net  (98)  193 
Deferred costs  (810)  (291)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  182   80 
Other assets, net  (37)  (33)
Accounts payable  946   (39)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  506   (257)
Due to related parties  -   (735)
Unearned revenue  705   1,701 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  1,719   (2,441)
Cash flows from investing activities        
Cash paid for Apex  (4,801)  - 
Cash paid for Illume  (250)  - 
Cash paid for CMAC, net of cash acquired  -   (2,205)
Capital expenditures  (64)  (49)
Collection of note and other receivable received in reverse recapitalization  -   555 
Net cash used in investing activities  (5,115)  (1,699)
Cash flows from financing activities        
(Repayments) borrowings from line of credit, net  (594)  (340)
Proceeds from the issuance of term debt  4,033   4,000 
Cash received in reverse recapitalization, net of expenses  1,500   1,985 
Repayment of debt  (1,393)  (1,000)
Convertible series C preferred stock retired  (4,529)  - 
Issuance of convertible series D preferred stock  7,042   - 
Paid financing costs associated with convertible series D preferred stock  (1,020)  - 
Purchase of treasury stock  -   (250)
Cash dividends paid on Series C Preferred  (651)  (91)
Paid financing costs  (270)  (109)
Holding share liability  -   (4)
Net cash provided by financing activities  4,118   4,191 
Effect on cash of foreign currency translation  15   - 
Net increase in cash  737   51 
Cash at beginning of year  366   315 
Cash at end of year $1,103  $366 
         
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:        
Interest paid $888  $1,438 
Income taxes paid  57   62 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities:        
Preferred and common shares issued in exchange for debt and related accrued interest $-  $4,117 
Preferred and common shares issued in exchange for accounts        
payable and related accrued interest  -   412 
Common shares issued as finder's fee in reverse capitalization  -   354 
Common stock issued in connection with Apex acquisition  341   - 
Common stock issued in connection with Illume acquisition  698   - 
Common stock issued to Preferred Series C holders as an anti dilution adjustment  173   - 
Cumulative and imputed dividends on preferred stock  288   305 
Warrants issued in connection with convertible series D preferred stock  355   - 

  Years Ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
Cash flows from operating activities      
Net income $891  $3,975 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  809   689 
Amortization of deferred financing costs and note discount  304   57 
Share-based compensation expense  324   83 
Acquisition earn-out adjustment  (110)  60 
Deferred income taxes, net  265   (3,910)
Allowance for doubtful accounts  5   (14)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (503)  (1,743)
Inventory, net  (3,469)  250 
Deferred costs  (746)  (287)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (148)  36 
Other assets, net  21   (29)
Accounts payable  4,047   1,185 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  275   23 
Due to related parties  16   35 
Operating lease liabilities  (163)   
Deferred revenue  717   1,417 
Net cash provided by operating activities  2,535   1,827 
Cash flows from investing activities        
Purchases of property and equipment  (175)  (84)
Cash paid for Royce acquisition, net of cash acquired  (500)  (4,189)
Net cash used in investing activities  (675)  (4,273)
Cash flows from financing activities        
Repayment of term debt  (1,636)  (385)
Line of credit  (19)  (67)
Proceeds from issuance of term debt     2,250 
Debt issuance costs  (36)  (165)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock     3,168 
Common stock issuance costs     (507)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  1   1 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (1,690)  4,295 
Change in cash and cash equivalents  170   1,849 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year  2,450   601 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $2,620  $2,450 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information        
Cash paid for interest $412  $325 
Cash paid for income taxes  113   17 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities        
Earn-out related to acquisition of Royce $  $1,050 
Disposals of property and equipment     2 
Fair value of warrants issued in connection with private placement offering     634 
Fair value of warrants issued in connection with private placement of subordinated notes     53 
Leased assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities  527    

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements


F-21


DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

F-6

December 31, 2012 and 2011

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1: Description of Business

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., (“DecisionPoint”, “Company”) through its subsidiarieswhich we sometimes refer to as the company, we or us, is an enterprise mobility systems integrator that sells, installs, deploys and installsrepairs mobile computing and wireless systems that are used both within a company’s facilities in conjunction with wireless networks and in the field using carrier-based wireless networks.field. These systems generally include mobile computers, mobile application software, and related data capture equipment including bar code scanners and radio frequency identification (“RFID”) readers. The CompanyWe also providesprovide professional services, consulting, staging, kitting, deployment, maintenance, proprietary and third partythird-party software and software customization as an integral part of itsour customized solutions for itsour customers. The suite of software products utilizes the latest technologies to empower themake complex mobile worker in many areas includingtechnologies easy to use, understand and keep running within all vertical markets such as; merchandising, sales and delivery; field service; logistics and transportation;transportation, healthcare and warehouse management.

The Company, formerly known as Comamtech,

On June 17, 2018, we acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Royce Digital Systems, Inc. (“Comamtech”RDS”), was incorporated on August 16, 2010,located in Canada under the lawsIrvine, California for consideration of the Ontario Business Corporations Act (“OCBA”). On June 15, 2011, the Company entered into a Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) among the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiary, 2259736 Ontario Inc., incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada (the “Purchaser”)$5,601,602. RDS provides innovative enterprise print and DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Old DecisionPoint”) incorporated on December 27, 2006, under the laws of the State of Delaware. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, under Section 182 of the OCBA, on June 15, 2011 (the “Effective Date”) Old DecisionPoint merged (the “Merger”) into the Purchasermobile technologies, deployment services and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. In connection with the Merger, the Company changed its name to DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., and the Purchaser changed its name to DecisionPoint Systems International, Inc. (“DecisionPoint Systems International”). The Company and DecisionPoint Systems International each reincorporated in the State of Delaware, subsequent to the Merger. Upon completion of the Merger, the Company adopted Old DecisionPoint’s business plan.

Accounting Treatment of the Merger; Financial Statement Presentation
Prior to the Merger, Comamtech was a “shell company” (as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). The Merger was accountedon-site maintenance. See Note 3 for as a reverse recapitalization pursuant to the guidance in “SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance Financial Reporting Manual”. These transactions are considered by the SEC to be capital transactions in substance, rather than business combinations. The Merger has been accounted for as a recapitalization which resulted in an exchange ratio of one Old DecisionPoint share for every 7.23273 shares of Comamtech common stock outstanding prior to the Merger. For accounting purposes, Old DecisionPoint is considered the acquirer and surviving entity in the reverse recapitalization. Accordingly, 2,186,689 shares were deemed issued to the Comamtech shareholders in exchange for approximately $3.9 million of net assets received. The accompanying historical consolidated financial statements prior to the Merger are those of Old DecisionPoint.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements present the previously issued shares of Comamtech common stock as having been issued pursuant to the Merger on June 15, 2011, with the consideration received for such issuance being the net assets of Comamtech received in the Merger. The shares of common stock of the Company issued to Old DecisionPoint’s stockholders in the Merger are presented as having been outstanding since the original issuance of the shares. Further, the exchange ratio has been retroactively applied to all share, weighted average share, loss per share, and stock option and warrant disclosures.
NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
additional information.

Note 2: Basis of Presentation

and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements of DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries have been prepared on an accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the CompanyDecisionPoint Systems, Inc. and its wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiaries, DecisionPoint Systems International and Apex Systems Integrators, Inc. (“Apex”DPSI”). DecisionPoint Systems International has two wholly-owned subsidiaries,, DecisionPoint Systems Group, Inc. (“DPS Group”), and CMAC,Royce Digital Systems, Inc. (“CMAC”RDS”). ApexRDS was acquired on June 4, 2012,17, 2018 and as such, the operating results of ApexRDS have been consolidated into the Company’sour consolidated results of operations beginning on June 5, 2012. In addition, on July 31, 2012, the Company consummated an asset purchase agreement (“Asset Purchase Agreement”) with MacroSolve, Inc. (the “Seller”) Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company purchased the business (including substantially all the related assets) of the seller’s Illume Mobile division (“Illume Mobile”).  The18, 2018. Our operating results of Illume Mobilesegments have been consolidatedaggregated into one reportable segment based on the Company’s consolidated resultssimilar nature of operations beginning on August 1, 2012.  The Company currently operatesproducts and services sold and economic characteristics. All our identifiable assets are in one business segment. Allthe United States and all intercompany transactions have been eliminated.


F-22

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates -

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires managementus to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Certain accounting policies involve judgments and uncertainties to such an extent that there is a reasonable likelihood that materially different amounts could have been reported under different conditions, or if different assumptions had been used. The Company evaluates itsWe evaluate our estimates and assumptions on a regular basis.  The Company uses historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances to form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.  Actual results may materially differ from these estimates and assumptions used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

Purchase Accounting and Business Combinations - The Company accounts for its business combinations using the purchase method of accounting which requires that intangible assets be recognized apart from goodwill if they are contractual in nature or separately identifiable.  Acquisitions are measured on the fair value of consideration exchanged and, if the consideration given is not cash, measurement is based on the fair value of the consideration given or the fair value of the assets acquired, whichever is more reliably measurable.  The excess of cost of an acquired entity over the fair value of identifiable acquired assets and liabilities assumed is allocated to goodwill.
The valuation and allocation process relies on significant assumptions made by management. In certain situations, the allocations of excess purchase price are based upon preliminary estimates and assumptions.  Accordingly, the allocations are subject to revision when the Company receives updated information, including appraisals and other analyses, which are completed within one year of the acquisition.  Revisions to the fair values, which may be significant, are recorded when pending information is finalized, within one year from the acquisition date.

Accounts Receivable -

Accounts receivable are stated at net realizable value, and as such, current earnings are charged with an allowancea provision for doubtful accounts based on management’sour best estimate of the amount of probable incurred credit losses in the Company’sour existing accounts receivable. The Company determines theWe determine an allowance based on historical write-off experience and specific account information available. Accounts receivable are reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets net of a valuation allowance of $246,000$37,000 and $246,000,$47,500 as of December 31, 20122019 and 2011,2018 respectively. When internal collection efforts on accounts have been exhausted, the accounts are written off by reducing the allowance for doubtful accounts.

accounts and the related customer receivable.

Inventory -

Inventory consists solely of finished goods and is stated at the lower of cost or market.net realizable value. Cost is determined under the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The CompanyWe periodically reviews itsreview our inventory and makesmake provisions as necessary for estimated obsolete and slow-moving goods. The creation of such provisions results in a write downreduction of inventory to net realizable value and a charge to cost of sales. Inventories are reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets net of a valuation allowance of $83,000$33,000 and $155,000,$85,100 as of December 31, 20122019 and 2011,2018, respectively.

Deferred costs

Deferred costs consist primarily of third partycustomer-related third-party extended hardware and software maintenance services which the Company haswe have paid for in advance. The costs are ratably amortized over the life of the contract, generally one to five years.

F-7

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Property and Equipment -

Property and equipment are recorded at cost.  Repairs and maintenance that do not improve or extend the lives of the respective assets are expensed in the period incurred.

F-23

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Depreciation of property and equipment is provided for bydepreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, as follows:
Computer equipment   3 to 5 years
Office furniture and fixtures      5 to 7 years
generally from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the life of the improvements.
Impairment Cost incurred for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Upon retirement or sale, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization of Long-Liveddisposed assets are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in other expense, net.

Intangible Assets - The Company reviews its and Long-lived Assets

We evaluate our intangible and long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets for impairment wheneverannually when events or circumstances arise that indicate intangible and long-lived assets may be impaired. Indicators of impairment include, but are not limited to, a significant deterioration in overall economic conditions, a decline in the market capitalization, the loss of significant business, or other significant adverse changes in circumstances indicateindustry or market conditions. We completed the qualitative assessment for impairment and determined that there was no impairment as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. There can be no assurance, however, that market conditions will not change or demand for our products will continue, which could result in an impairment of intangible and long-lived assets in the carrying amountfuture.

Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives using an accelerated method to their estimated residual values, if any.  Our intangible assets consist of an asset may not be recoverable.  Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the carrying amount of an assetcustomer lists, customer relationships and trade names. Refer to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset.  If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of theNote 3 for further information on our intangible assets.  Assets to be disposed of by sale are reflected at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.  To date, the Company has not recorded any impairment charges  .

Goodwill

Goodwill Goodwill isrepresents the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired business.acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but tested for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that carrying values may not be recoverable. We assess the impairment of goodwill annually at each year-end or if indicators or impairment are present.

We completed our annual assessment for goodwill impairment and determined that goodwill was not impaired as of December 31, for2019 and 2018, and no adjustment was required. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we recognized additional goodwill of $1,689,263 related to a business acquisition as further described in Note 3.

Factors that we consider important that could trigger an impairment assessment include, but not limited to, the following:

significant under-performance relative to historical and projected operating results;

significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or business strategy; and

significant negative industry or general economic trends.

When performing the impairment review, we determine the carrying amount of a reporting unit by comparingassigning assets and liabilities, including the existing goodwill, to each reporting unit. To evaluate whether goodwill is impaired, we compare the estimated fair value of theeach reporting unit to itswhich the goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit’s carrying amount including goodwill.amount. If the carrying amount of thea reporting unit exceeds its fair value, anthe amount of the impairment loss maywill be recognized.  The amountrecognized as the difference of impairment loss is determined by comparing the impliedestimated fair value and the carrying value of the reporting unit goodwill withunder the carrying amount.  If the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value then an impairment loss is recognized equal to that excess.  No impairment charges have been recorded as a result of the Company’s annual impairment assessments.

Intangible assets – Purchased intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives (using an accelerated method for customer relationships and trade names) to their estimated residual values, if any.  The Company’s finite-lived intangible assets consist of customer relationships, contractor and resume databases, trade names, and internal use software and are being amortized over periods ranging from two to nine years.  Purchased intangible assets are reviewed annually to determine if facts and circumstances indicate that the useful life is shorter than originally estimated or that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable.  If such facts and circumstances exist, recoverability is assessed by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their remaining lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairments, if any, are based on the excess of the carrying amount overnew accounting standard.

Determining the fair value of those assets.  Ifa reporting unit is judgmental in nature and involves the useful life is shorter than originally estimated, the rateuse of amortization is acceleratedsignificant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue and expense growth rates, capital expenditures and the remaining carrying value is amortized overdepreciation and amortization related to capital expenditures, changes in working capital, discount rates, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic and market conditions and the new shorter useful life.  No impairments were identified and changesdetermination of appropriate comparable companies. Due to estimated useful lives have been recorded.

Deferred Financing Costs - Costs incurred by the Companyinherent uncertainty involved in connection with the issuance of debt are deferred and amortizedmaking these estimates, actual future results related to interest expense over the life of the underlying indebtedness, adjusted to reflect any early repayments using the effective interest rate method.  Deferred financing costs net of amortization totaled approximately $107,000 and $90,000, as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
assumed variables could differ from these estimates.

Fair Value Measurement -

Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. Applicable accounting guidance provides a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that prioritize the use of observable inputs over the use of unobservable inputs, when such observable inputs are available. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

·  Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

F-8

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

·  Level 2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets), or model-driven valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated with, observable market data.

·  Level 3 - Fair value is derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable, including assumptions and judgments made by the Company.us.
F-24

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012

The carrying amounts of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and 2011

Assetsaccrued expenses, and liabilities are classified based on the lowest levelline of input that is significantcredit approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The carrying amount of our debt approximates its fair value measurements.as the credit markets have not materially changed since the original borrowing dates. The Company reviews the fair value hierarchy classification on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observable inputs may result in a reclassification of assets and liabilities within the three levels of the hierarchy outlined above.
Liabilities Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The Company measures certain liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis such as our contingent consideration related to business combinations and recognizes transfers within the fair value hierarchy at the end of the fiscal quarter in which the change in circumstances that caused the transfer occurred. There have been no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 assets or liabilities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.
The Company has classified its contingent consideration related to the acquisitions as a Level 3 liability. (See “Note 4 – Acquisitions” for a description of the acquisitions along with comprehensive details regarding the assumptions used in calculatingestimated fair value of the contingent consideration)reporting unit used for the annual goodwill impairment test was derived using stock sales with third parties, as well as quoted market prices (Level 2).

Business Combinations

We utilize the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations and allocates the purchase price of an acquisition to the various tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. We primarily establish fair value using the income approach based upon a discounted cash flow model. The income approach requires the use of many assumptions and estimates including future revenues and expenses, as well as discount factors and income tax rates. Other estimates include:

Estimated step-ups or write-downs for fixed assets and inventory;

Estimated fair values of intangible assets; and

Estimated liabilities assumed from the target

While we use our best estimates and assumptions as part of the purchase price allocation process to accurately value assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the business acquisition date, these estimates and assumptions are inherently uncertain and subject to refinement. As a result, during the purchase price allocation period, which is generally no more than one year from the business acquisition date, we may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill.

Revenue Recognition

We adopted Accounting Standards Updated (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” which created Topic 606 with an initial adoption date of January 1, 2018. The adoption of Topic 606 resulted in a cumulative effect adjustment that increased retained earnings by $54,597. This adjustment was associated with the deferral of contract acquisition costs. There was no change in revenues reported using this method as compared to previous guidance.

We determine revenue recognition through the following steps: (1) identification of the contract with a customer; (2) identification of the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determination of the transaction price; (4) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognition of revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied.

We combine contracts with the same customer into a single contract for accounting purposes when the contracts are entered into at or near the same time and the contracts are negotiated as a single commercial package, consideration in one contract depends on the other contract, or the services are considered a single performance obligation. If an arrangement involves multiple performance obligations, the items are analyzed to determine the separate units of accounting, whether the items have value on a standalone basis and whether there is objective and reliable evidence of their standalone selling price. The total contract transaction price is allocated to the identified performance obligations based upon the relative standalone selling prices of the performance obligations. The standalone selling price is based on an observable price for services sold to other comparable customers, when available, or an estimated selling price using a cost plus margin approach. We estimate the amount of total contract consideration we expect to receive for variable arrangements by determining the most likely amount we expect to earn from the arrangement based on the expected quantities of services we expect to provide, and the contractual pricing based on those quantities. We only include some or a portion of variable consideration in the transaction price when it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur or when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. We consider the sensitivity of the estimate, our relationship and experience with our client and variable services being performed, the range of possible revenue amounts and the magnitude of the variable consideration to the overall arrangement.

As discussed in more detail below, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services under the terms of a contract and is measured as the amount of consideration, we expect to receive in exchange for transferring goods or providing services. We do not have any material extended payment terms, as payment is due at or shortly after the time of the sale. Observable prices are used to determine the standalone selling price of separate performance obligations, or a cost plus margin approach is used when observable prices are not available. Sales, value-added and other assumptions usedtaxes collected concurrently with revenue producing activities are excluded from revenue.

F-9

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

We recognize contract assets or unbilled receivables related to revenue recognized for services completed but not yet invoiced to our clients. Unbilled receivables are recorded when we have an unconditional right to contract consideration. A contract liability is recognized as deferred revenue when we invoice clients, or receive customer cash payments, in advance of performing the calculation require significant management judgment. The Company reassessesrelated services under the fair valueterms of a contract. Remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price allocated to the performance obligations that are unsatisfied as of the contingent consideration liabilities on a quarterly basis. Based on that assessment,end of each reporting period. Deferred revenue is recognized as revenue when we have satisfied the Company did not recognize any adjustment to the actual calculation of the earn-out obligations during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.

related performance obligation.

As of December 31, 2012, liabilities recorded2019, the total aggregate transaction price allocated to the unsatisfied performance obligations was approximately $5.6 million, of which approximately $3.6 million is expected to be recognized over the next 12 months.

Hardware, consumables and software products - We recognize product revenue at fair value onthe point in time when a recurring basis consistclient takes control of the following (in thousands):   

     Fair Value Measurements 
  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
             
Liabilities            
Contingent consideration liability            
recorded for business combinations $1,346  $-  $-  $1,346 
                 
The following table summarizes changeshardware and/or software, which typically occurs when title and risk of loss have passed to the fair value of the contingent consideration, whichclient. Our selling terms and conditions reflect that F.O.B ‘dock’ contractual terms establish that control is a Level 3 liability (in thousands):
  Contingent consideration 
    
Balance at December 31, 2011 $- 
Apex earn-out  1,033 
Apex bonus consideration  153 
Illume Mobile earn-out  107 
Changes in fair value  - 
Effect of currency translation  53 
Balance at December 31, 2012 $1,346 
     
Assets Measured and Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The Company's non-financial assets and liabilities, such as goodwill, intangible assets, and other long lived assets resultingtransferred from business combinations are measured at fair value using income and market comparable valuation methodologiesus at the date of acquisition and subsequently re-measured if there are indicators of impairment. There were no indicators of impairment identified duringpoint in time when the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.
Translation of Foreign Currencies - The Company's functional currencyproduct is shipped to the U.S. dollar. The financial statements of the Company's foreign subsidiary is measured using the local currency, in this case the Canadian dollar (CDN$), as its functional currency and is translated to U.S. dollars for reporting purposes. Assets and liabilities of the subsidiary are translated at exchange rates as of the balance sheet dates. customer.

Revenues and expenses of the subsidiary are translated at the rates of exchange in effect during the year.

F-25

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Revenue Recognition - Revenues are generated through product sales, warranty and maintenance agreements,from software customization, and professional services.  Productlicense sales are recognized when the following criteriaas a single performance obligation on a gross basis as we are met (1) there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exits; (2) delivery has occurred and title has passed to the customer which generally happensacting as a principal in these transactions at the point the software license is delivered to the customer. Generally, software licenses are sold with accompanying third-party delivered software assurance, which allows customers to upgrade, at no additional cost, to the latest technology if new capabilities are introduced during the period that the software assurance is in effect. We determined that the accompanying third-party delivered software assurance is critical or essential to the core functionality of shipment providedthe software license because we do not sell the software license and standard warranty on a standalone basis (which indicates that nothe customer cannot benefit from the software license and standard warranty on its own), the software license and the standard warranty are not separately identifiable, the software license assurance warranty are inputs of a combined item in the contract, the assurance warranty and software license are highly interdependent and interrelated because the core functionality of the license is dependent on the assurance warranty, and our promise to provide the assurance warranty that is necessary for the software license to continue to provide significant obligations remain; (3)benefit to the customer. As a result, the software license and the accompanying third party delivered software assurance are recognized as a single performance obligation.

We leverage drop-ship shipments with many of our partners and suppliers to deliver hardware and consumable products to our clients without having to physically hold the inventory at our warehouses, thereby increasing efficiency and reducing costs. We recognize revenue for drop-ship arrangements on a gross basis as the principal in the transaction when the product is received by the client because we control the product prior to transfer to the client. We also assume primary responsibility for the fulfillment in the arrangement, we assume inventory risk if the product is returned by the client, we set the price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.  The Company generates revenues from the sale of extended warranties on wireless and mobile hardware and systems.  Revenue related to extended warranty and service contracts is recorded as unearned revenue and is recognized over the life of the contract asproduct charged to the Company maintains financialclient, we assume credit risk throughout the term of these contractsfor nonpayment by our customer, and may be liablewe work closely with clients to refund a customer for amounts paid in certain circumstances. Our policy is to classify shipping and handling costs billed to customers and the related expenses as cost of sales.

The Company also generates revenue fromdetermine their hardware specifications.

Professional services - We provide professional services which include consulting, staging, deployment, installation, repair and customer specified software customizationcustomization. The arrangement is based on either a fee-for-servicetime and material basis or a fixed fee. For our time and materials service contracts, we recognize revenues as those services are provided and consumed, as this is the best output measure of how the services are transferred to the customer. Fixed fee basis.  Revenue from software customization and professional services that is contracted as fee-for-service iscontracts are recognized in the period in which the services are performed or delivered.  Adjustments to contract price and estimated labor costs are made periodically, and losses expected to be incurreddelivered using a proportional service model. Revenue is recognized on contracts in progress are charged to operationsa gross basis in the period such lossesin which the services are determined.  The Company records sales netperformed or delivered.

Maintenance services - We sell certain Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) hardware and software maintenance support arrangements to our clients. We also offer an internal maintenance agreement related to hardware. These contracts are support service agreements for the hardware and/or software products that were acquired from us and others. Although these are third-party support agreements for maintenance on the specific hardware and/or software products, our internal help desk and systems engineers assist customers by providing technical assistance on the source of sales tax.

The Company enters into revenue arrangements that contain multiple deliverables.  Judgment is requiredor how to properly identifyfix the accounting unitsproblem. In addition, we also provide a turn back feature, deploying replacements as needed while we manage the return and reverse logistics of the multiple deliverable transactions andproduct back to determine the manner in which revenue should be allocated among the accounting units. Moreover, judgment is used in interpreting the commercial terms and determining when all criteria of revenue recognition have been met for each deliverable in order for revenue recognitionOEM. Revenue related to occur in the appropriate accounting period. While changes in the allocation of the arrangement consideration between the units of accounting will not affect the amount of total revenue recognized for a particular sales arrangement, any material changes in these allocations could impact the timing of revenue recognition, which could affect the Company’s results of operations. When the Company enters into an arrangement that includes multiple elements, the allocation of value to each element is derived based on management’s best estimate of selling price when vendor specific objective evidence or third party evidence is unavailable.
Revenue from software licenses is recognized when all of the software revenue recognition criteria are met and, if applicable, when vendor specific objective evidence, or VSOE, exists to allocate the total license fee to each element of multiple-element software arrangements, including post-contract customer support. Post-contract supportservice contracts is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement, generally over one to three years.

We act as the principal in the transaction as the primary obligor for fulfillment in the arrangement, we set the price of the service charged to the customer, and we assume credit risk for the amounts invoiced. In addition, we manage back-end warranties, service contracts and repairs for multiple products and suppliers. We leverage our knowledge base of mobility best practices by consolidating multiple suppliers’ supplier’s maintenance requirements under a single point in contact through us. Our internal support period. Whenteam assists our customers first by performing an initial technical triage to determine the source of the problem including, but not limited to, physical damage and software issues and whether they can be handled remotely by the client or returned for repair. Further, we receive the returned products, confirm that the equipment is operational or not, either repair or refurbish the equipment internally or return it to the manufacturer directly to repair. We then obtain the product turn back from the manufacturer and either send it back out to a specific customer location or place in a customer’s spare pool. As a result, we recognize the revenue on a gross basis.

We defer costs to acquire contracts, including commissions, incentives and payroll taxes if they are incremental and recoverable costs of obtaining a customer contract with a term exceeding one year. Deferred contract costs are amortized to sales and marketing expense over the contract term, generally over one to three years. We have elected to recognize the incremental costs of obtaining a contract contains multiple elements whereinwith a term of less than one year as a selling expense when incurred. We include deferred contract acquisition costs in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” in the only undelivered element is post-contract customer supportconsolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2019 and VSOE ofDecember 31, 2018, we had $109,309 and $58,027, respectively, related to deferred contract acquisition costs. We recorded $35,752 and $35,277 in amortized deferred contract acquisition costs in 2019 and 2018, respectively.

F-10

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the fair value of post-contract customer support does not exist,Consolidated Financial Statements

The following table summarizes net sales by revenue from the entire arrangement is recognized ratably over the support period. Software royalty revenue is recognized in arrears on a quarterly basis, based upon reports received from licensees during the period, unless collectability is not reasonably assured, in which case revenue is recognized when payment is received from the licensee.

source (in thousands):

  

Year Ended

December 31,

 
  2019  2018 
Hardware and software $27,184  $23,231 
Consumables  4,806   2,778 
Professional services  11,899   9,149 
  $43,889  $35,158 

Concentration of Risk-

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Companyus to a concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and accounts receivable. All our cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable.  On November 9, 2010,balances are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) implemented section 343up to $250,000 per depositor at each financial institution. As of December 31, 2019, we had $2,013,000 on deposit in excess of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reforminsurance limits. We have not experienced any such losses in these accounts.

In 2019, Kaiser Permanente and Consumer Protection Act that providesPitney Bowes accounted for unlimited insurance coverageapproximately 24%, or $10.8 million, and 11%, or $4.7 million, of noninterest-bearing accounts.  Beginningour net sales, respectively. No other single customer in 2019 accounted for more than 10% of net sales.

Accounts receivable from these customers at December 31, 20102019 accounted for 58% of total accounts receivable.

In 2018,Kaiser Permanente, Pitney Bowes and continuing throughCareFusion accounted for approximately 16%, or $5.8 million, 14%, or $4.8 million, and 12%, or $4.3 million, of our net sales, respectively. No other single customer in 2018 accounted for more than 10% of net sales. Accounts receivable from these three customers at December 31, 2012, all noninterest-bearing2018 accounted for 50% of total accounts are fully insured regardless of the balance of the account.  This coverage is available at all FDIC member institutions.  The Company uses Silicon Valley Bank, which is an FDIC insured institution. Based on these facts, collectability of bank balances appears to be adequate.

receivable.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company2019, we had sales topurchases from two customers whichsuppliers that collectively represented a total of 12.5% and 6.9%,73% of total revenues.  Accounts receivable from two customerspurchases and 85% of accounts payable at December 31, 2012, were approximately 14% and 10%.2019. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company had sales to two customers which represented a total of 26% of total revenues.  Accounts receivable from two customers at December 31, 2011, accounted for 14% and 10% of accounts receivable.  The loss of a significant customer could have a material adverse impact on the Company.

F-26

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
The Company has had the same four primary vendors in both periods presented.  For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company2018, we had purchases from these four vendorstwo suppliers that collectively represented 71%61% of total purchases and 67%63% of the total outstanding accounts payable at December 31, 2012.  For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company had purchases from these four vendors that collectively represented 76% of total purchases and 74% of the total outstanding accounts payable at December 31, 2011.  The same single vendor represented 28% and 27% of the total purchases for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.2019. Loss of this certaina significant vendor could have a material adverse effect on our operations.
Fair Value

Share-Based Compensation

We account for employee and director share-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of Financial Instruments - The Company’s financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, line of credit and long term debt.  The carryingASC Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation”. Under ASC 718, share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the short term financial instruments approximates their fair values at December 31, 2012award, and 2011, due to their short-term maturities.  The carrying valueis recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the Company’s long-term debt approximates its fair value, netequity grant).

All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of a discount relatedequity instruments to a final payment to be madenon-employees are accounted for based on the due date which is equal to two percent of the original loan amount.

Stock-Based Compensation - The Company records the fair value of allthe consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the estimated fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the third-party performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.

Employee and director stock-based compensation awards in its consolidated financial statements.  The terms and vesting schedules for stock-based awards vary by type of grant and generally vestexpense recognized during the period is based on the passagevalue of time.the portion of stock-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period. Given that stock-based compensation expense recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. We account for forfeitures as they occur, rather than estimate expected forfeitures.

Compensation cost for stock awards, which include restricted stock units (“RSUs”), is measured at the fair value on the grant date and recognized as expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over the related service period. The fair value of stock options and warrantsawards is based on the estimated fair value of our common stock on the grant date.

The estimated fair value of common stock option awards is calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricingoption pricing model. The Black-Scholes model requires subjective assumptions regarding future stock price volatility and expected time to exercise, along with assumptions about the risk-free interest rate and expected dividends, all of which affect the estimated fair values of our common stock option awards. Given a lack of historical stock option exercises, the expected term of options granted is calculated as the average of the weighted vesting period and the contractual expiration date of the option. This calculation is based on a method permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission in instances where the vesting and exercise terms of options granted meet certain conditions and where limited historical exercise data is available. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the common stock of comparable public companies that operate in similar industries as us.

F-11

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The risk-free rate selected to value any particular grant is based on the U.S. Treasury rate that corresponds to the expected term of the grant effective as of the date of the grant. The expected dividend assumption is based on our history and management’s expectation regarding dividend payouts.

Compensation expense for common stock option awards with graded vesting schedules is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period netfor the last separately vesting portion of estimated forfeitures.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) - Thethe award, provided that the accumulated cost recognized as of shares issuedany date at least equals the value of the vested portion of the award.

If there are any modifications or cancellations of the underlying vested or unvested stock-based awards, we may be required to accelerate, increase or cancel any remaining unearned stock-based compensation expense, or record additional expense for vested stock-based awards. Future stock-based compensation expense and unearned stock- based compensation may increase to the ESOP, but not yet earned is shown as a reductionextent that we grant additional common stock options or other stock-based awards.

Income Taxes

We utilize the asset and liability method of equity.  Compensation expense isaccounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the market pricedifference between the consolidated financial statement and tax bases of shares as theyassets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are committedexpected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be releasedrealized.

Under ASC Topic 740, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to participant accounts.    As shares of common stock acquiredbe sustained upon audit by the ESOP are committedrelevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. Additionally, ASC Topic 740 provides requirements for derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. Our policy is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act reduced the corporate tax rate to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. Also, we have elected to treat the tax effect of Global Intangible Low Tax Income (“GILTI”) as a current-period expense when incurred. We do not foresee material changes to our gross liability of uncertain tax positions within the next twelve months.

At December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we had no unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect our effective income tax rate over the next 12 months. We recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expense. As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we had no accrued interest or penalties.

Accounting Standards Adopted in 2019

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”). The amendments in this update clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be released to each employee, the Company reports compensation expense equal to the current market priceaccounted for as acquisitions or disposals of the shares, and the shares become outstandingassets or businesses. ASU 2017-01 is effective for earnings per share computations.

Comprehensive Loss - Comprehensive loss consists of net loss and accumulated other comprehensive loss, which includes certain changes in equity that are excluded from net loss.  Comprehensive lossus for the year ended December 31, 2012 is equal to the net loss of $3,866,000 plus other comprehensive income totaling $22,000 (relating to exchange translation adjustments arising from the consolidation of the Company’s Canadian Apex subsidiary) to arrive at comprehensive loss of $3,844,000.  Comprehensive loss for the year ended 2011 is equal to the net loss reported.
Income Taxes –2019 and interim reporting periods. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance, which requires deferred tax assets and liabilities, be recognized using enacted tax rates to measure the effect of temporary differences between book and tax bases on recorded assets and liabilities. FASB guidance also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance, if it is more likely than not some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be recognized.
The Company evaluates on an annual basis its ability to realize deferred tax assets by assessing its valuation allowance and by adjusting the amount of such allowance, if necessary. The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization are forecasts of future taxable income and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to realize the net deferred tax assets.
In accordance with FASB guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, the Company evaluates tax positions to determine whether the benefits of tax positions are more likely than not of being sustained upon audit based on the technical merits of the tax position. For tax positions that are more likely than not of being sustained upon audit, the Company recognizes the largest amount of the benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. For tax positions that are not more likely than not of being sustained upon audit, the Company does not recognize any portion of the benefit. If the more likely than not threshold is not met in the period for which a tax position is taken, the Company may subsequently recognize the benefit of that tax position if the tax matter is effectively settled, the statute of limitations expires, or if the more likely than not threshold is met in a subsequent period.
Reclassifications -  Certain reclassifications have been made to prior years to conform to current period financial statement presentation with no effect on our previously reported consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
F-27

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
New Accounting Standards
In July 2012, The FASB has issued ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles--Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment.   This ASU states that an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing the fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with Codification Subtopic 350-30,   Intangibles--Goodwill and Other, General Intangibles Other than Goodwill.
Under the guidance in this ASU, an entity also has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing the quantitative impairment test. An entity will be able to resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period.
The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material effect on theguidance did not significantly impact our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2012,February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2012-04, "Technical Corrections2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This guidance requires an entity to recognize lease liabilities and Improvements."a right-of-use asset for all leases on the balance sheet and to disclose key information about the entity’s leasing arrangements. ASU 2012-04 contains amendments to clarify the ASC, correct unintended application of guidance, or make minor improvements to the ASC that are not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice or create a significant administrative cost to most entities.  Additionally, the amendments are intended to make the ASC easier to understand and the fair value measurement guidance easier to apply by eliminating inconsistencies and providing needed clarifications.  The amendments that do not have transition guidance were effective upon issuance.  The amendments that are subject to the transition guidance will be2016-02 is effective for fiscalannual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012.  The2018, including interim periods within that reporting period, with earlier adoption permitted. In July 2018, the FASB approved an amendment to the new guidance that allows companies the option of using the effective date of the new standard as the initial application (at the beginning of the period in which it is adopted, rather than at the beginning of the earliest comparative period) and to recognize the effects of applying the new ASU as a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance sheet or retained earnings. Based on the effective dates, we have adopted the new guidance at the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal 2019 using the new transition election to not restate comparative periods. We have elected the package of practical expedients upon adoption, which permits us to not reassess under the new standard our prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification, and initial direct costs. In addition, we have elected not to separate lease and non-lease components for all real estate leases and did not elect the hindsight practical expedient.

Lastly, we elected a short-term lease exception policy, permitting it to exclude the recognition requirements of this standard from leases with initial terms of 12 months or less. Upon adoption, we recognized operating lease assets of approximately $644,000 and operating lease liabilities of approximately $654,000 on our consolidated balance sheet, with no significant change to our consolidated statements of operations or cash flows. Refer to Note 12 for further information about our lease.

F-12

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118. This standard amends Accounting Standards Codification 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740) to provide guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Act pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which allowed companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740 within a one-year measurement period from the Tax Act enactment date. This standard is effective upon issuance and did not significantly impact our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Stock-based Compensation: Improvements to Nonemployee Share-based Payment Accounting, which amends the existing accounting standards for share-based payments to nonemployees. This ASU aligns much of the guidance on measuring and classifying nonemployee awards with that of awards to employees. Under the new guidance, the measurement of nonemployee equity awards is fixed on the grant date. This ASU became effective for us in the first quarter of 2019. Entities will apply the ASU by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the annual period of adoption. Our adoption of ASU 2012-04 willthis guidance did not have a material impact on our results of operations or ourconsolidated financial position.

statements.

Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

In February 2013,June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, "Comprehensive Income2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 220)326): ReportingMeasurement of Amounts Reclassified outCredit Losses on Financial Instruments. This ASU will require the measurement of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income."all expected credit losses for financial assets, including trade receivables, held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The guidance was initially effective for us in the first quarter of 2020. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02 requires an entity to report2019-10, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates,” which, among other things, defers the effecteffective date of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required to be reclassified in its entirety to net income.  For other amountsASU 2016-13 for public filers that are not requiredconsidered smaller reporting companies as defined by the SEC to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures that provide additional detail about those amounts.  The amendments do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements.  For public entities, the amendments are effective prospectively for reporting periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2012.2022, including interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted. TheWe believe the adoption of this ASU 2013-02 will not significantly impact the results of operations and financial position.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), – Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which makes a number of changes meant to add, modify or remove certain disclosure requirements associated with the movement amongst or hierarchy associated with Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. This guidance is effective for us in the first quarter of 2020. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, Intangibles–Goodwill and Other–Internal-Use Software that requires implementation costs incurred by customers in cloud computing arrangements to be deferred and recognized over the term of the arrangement, if those costs would be capitalized by the customer in a software licensing arrangement under the internal-use software guidance in ASC Topic 350, Intangibles–Goodwill and Other. This ASU requires a customer to disclose the nature of its hosting arrangements that are service contracts and provide disclosures as if the deferred implementation costs were a separate, major depreciable asset class. ASU 2018-15 is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of 2020. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes,” to simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. ASU 2019-12 is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of 2022. We do not expect this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Note 3: Acquisition

On June 17, 2018, we acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of Royce Digital Systems, Inc. (“RDS”), a corporation under the laws of the State of California, from its principal owner for consideration of $5,601,602. The consideration we paid is comprised of cash (including working capital adjustments) of $4,573,079 and an estimated earn-out obligation of $1,050,000 as of the acquisition date. RDS provides innovated enterprise print and mobile technologies, deployment services and on-site maintenance. RDS is located in Southern California.

This transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method pursuant to ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. Accordingly, goodwill has been measured as the excess of the total consideration over the amounts assigned to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The operating results for RDS have been consolidated into our results of operations or our financial position.beginning June 18, 2018.

F-13


DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

We may be required to pay up to an undiscounted amount of $2,000,000 in consideration for RDS achieving certain levels of revenues during the first and second 12-month period post acquisition (the “earn-out payment”). The initial fair value of the earn-out payment was calculated to be $1,050,000 as of the date of the acquisition.

The estimated RDS earn-out obligation was $500,000 and $1,110,000 at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. In August 2019, we paid $500,000 related to the RDS’s acquisition first year earn-out payment consideration. An adjustment of $110,000 was recorded in operating expenses in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

The allocation of the total consideration to the acquired net assets as of the acquisition date for RDS is as follows (in thousands):

Cash $384 
Accounts receivable  1,282 
Inventory  205 
Other assets  9 
Customer lists and relationships  3,270 
Trade name  490 
Deferred income tax liabilities  (959)
Accounts payable  (400)
Accrued expenses  (208)
Deferred revenue  (160)
Total fair value excluding goodwill  3,913 
Goodwill  1,689 
Total consideration $5,602 

Intangible Assets

Definitive lived intangible assets related to the RDS acquisition are as follows (in thousands):

  December 31, 2019  December 31, 2018 
  Gross Amount  Accumulated Amortization  Net Amount  Gross Amount  Accumulated Amortization  Net Amount 
Customer lists and relationships $3,270  $(1,104) $2,166  $3,270  $(539) $2,731 
Trade name  490   (262)  228   490   (94)  396 
  $3,760  $(1,366) $2,394  $3,760  $(633) $3,127 

The range of useful lives and the weighted-average remaining useful life of amortizable intangible assets at December 31, 2019 is as follows:

Expected LifeWeighted Average Remaining Useful Life
Customer lists and relationships7-10 years7.8 years
Trade name3 years1.5 years

F-14

NOTE 3 – LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

The amortization expense of the definite lived intangible assets for the years remaining is as follows:

  Estimated
Amortization
 
  (in thousands) 
Year ending December 31,   
2020 $673 
2021  534 
2022  394 
2023  290 
2024  204 
Thereafter  299 
Total $2,394 

Amortization expense recognized during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $732,826 and $632,914. Amortization expense is calculated on an accelerated basis.

Note 4: Net Income Per Share

Basic lossnet income per common share is computed by dividing the lossnet income available to common shareholdersstockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted lossnet income per share is computedcalculated similarly to basic loss per share amounts, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. The weighted-average basic and diluted shares for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, exclude approximately 0.6 million and 0.7 million, respectively, of ESOP shares that have not been committed to be released.

F-28

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011

For periods presented in which there is a net loss, potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation of fully diluted net loss per share as their effect is anti-dilutive. Below is a reconciliation of the fully dilutive securities effect for the period with net income (in thousands except share and per share data):

  December 31, 
  2012  2011 
       
Net loss attributable to common shareholders $(4,820) $(5,654)
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted  7,900,693   6,019,900 
         
Loss per common share - basic and diluted $(0.61) $(0.94)
         
For the years ended December 31, 20122019 and 2011, respectively, potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation of fully diluted net loss per share as their effect is anti-dilutive.
Potential dilutive securities consist of (in thousands):
  December 31, 
  2012  2011 
       
Convertible preferred stock - Series A  270   270 
Convertible preferred stock - Series B  131   131 
Convertible preferred stock - Series C  -   1,415 
Convertible preferred stock - Series D  7,042   - 
Warrants to purchase common stock  981   429 
Options to purchase common stock  544   702 
         
Total potentially dilutive securities  8,968   2,947 
         
NOTE 4 – ACQUISITIONS
In pursuing our business strategies, we acquire and make investments in certain businesses that meet strategic and financial criteria.
Illume Mobile
On July 31, 2012 (“Illume Mobile Closing Date”), the Company consummated an asset purchase agreement (“Asset Purchase Agreement”) with MacroSolve, Inc. (the “Seller”) Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company purchased the business (including substantially all the related assets) of the seller’s Illume Mobile division (“Illume Mobile”), based in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Founded in 1996, Illume Mobile is a mobile business solutions provider that serves mobile products and platforms. Illume Mobile’s initial core business is the development and integration of business applications for mobile environments.
In consideration for the business of Illume Mobile, the Company paid $1,000,000, of which $250,000 was paid in cash and $750,000 was paid in the form of 617,284 shares of the Company’s common stock. The number of shares issued was based on the volume weighted-average closing price of the Company’s common stock of $1.215 per share over the twenty trading days prior to the Illume Mobile Closing Date. The closing price of the Company’s common stock on the day of the Illume Mobile Closing was $1.13 per share. Accordingly, the Company has valued the shares issued in conjunction with the acquisition at $698,000.

F-29

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company may be required to make an additional payment (“Earn-Out Payment”) to the Seller of up to $500,000, based on the achievement of specified levels of net revenue during the twelve months ending July 31, 2013, of which 50% will be paid in cash, and 50% will be paid in shares of the common stock of the Company. The value of the shares will be based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the one year anniversary of the Illume Mobile Closing Date. The Earn-Out Payment will be paid within 30 days of the one year anniversary of the Closing Date. Closing costs and associated expenses totaled approximately $140,000. The Company paid Sigma Capital Advisors a fee of $45,000 for services provided in connection with the Asset Purchase Agreement. The transaction was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and the operating results for Illume Mobile have been consolidated into the Company’s results of operations beginning on August 1, 2012.
The purchase price was allocated to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date. The following table summarizes the fair value of the Illume Mobile assets acquired and liabilities assumed at July 31, 2012 (in thousands):
Assets acquired:    
Accounts receivable $16 
Other current assets                 15 
Property and equipment                 26 
Intangible assets               630 
Goodwill               444 
Total assets            1,131 
     
Liabilities assumed:    
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities                 39 
Unearned revenue                 37 
Total liabilities assumed                 76 
  Net assets acquired $1,055 
     
Purchase consideration:    
Cash paid at closing $250 
Shares issued at closing               698 
Earn out consideration               107 
Total purchase consideration $1,055 
     
Under the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Earn-Out Payment will be computed as follows:
(a)  If Net Revenue (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) attributable to Illume Mobile, during the one year period commencing on the Illume Mobile Closing Date is $1,500,000 or less, the Earn-Out Payment will be $0.
(b)  If Net Revenue (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) is greater than $1,500,000 but less than $2,000,000, the Earn-Out Payment will be $100,000.
(c)  If Net Revenue (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) is at least $2,000,000 but less than $3,000,000, the Earn-Out Payment will be equal to the sum of (i) $100,000 plus (ii) 40% of the excess of the Net Revenue amount over $2,000,000.
(d)  If Net Revenue (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) is $3,000,000 or more, the Earn-Out Payment will be $500,000.
F-30

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
The Earn-Out Payment amount was recorded as additional purchase price consideration and the fair value was estimated by using a probability weighting of achieving various future revenue results simulation model to calculate the present value of the earn-out and determine the probability of reaching the earn-out milestones.
The present value of the total earn-out amount was calculated using a discount rate of 21.0%. The discount rate was determined based on an estimated venture capital rate of return. The fair value of the Earn-Out Payment was calculated to be approximately $107,000 and is recorded as accrued earn-out consideration in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012.
The fair value of the intangible assets acquired at July 31, 2012, and the estimated useful lives over which they are being amortized are (in thousands):
  Fair Value Estimated Useful life
     
Software $310 3.5 years
Customer relationships  100 3 years
Trade name  130 3 years
Covenant not to compete  90 2 years
      
  $630  
The fair value of proprietary software and trade names was determined using a relief from royalty method based on the expected future revenue streams.  The fair value of customer relationships was determined using the estimated future cash flows attributable to existing customers.  The fair value of the covenant not to compete was calculated as the present value of the income expected to be generated as a result of the covenanters not competing with the business.
Amortization of proprietary software is calculated as the greater of the proportional revenue approach or the straight-line approach. Amortization of customer relationships and trade names are calculated on the discounted cash flow methodology to more properly reflect the greater useful life of the assets in the early years and the covenant not to compete is amortized on a straight-line basis.
The transaction resulted in a purchase price residual at the Illume Mobile Closing Date of approximately $444,000 for goodwill, representing the financial, strategic and operational value of the transaction to DecisionPoint. Goodwill is attributed to the premium that the Company was willing to pay to obtain the value of the Illume Mobile business and the synergies created with the integration of key components of a commercial infrastructure. The total amount of the goodwill acquired is deductible for tax purposes.
Apex Systems Integrators, Inc.
On June 4, 2012 (“Closing Date”), pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”), the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Apex Systems Integrators, Inc. (“Apex”), a corporation organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada. Apex is a provider of wireless mobile work force software solutions.
In consideration for the shares of Apex, the Company paid CDN$5,000,000 (US$4,801,000 at the Closing Date) (“Closing Amount”) in cash. The Company could pay up to an additional undiscounted amount of CDN$3,500,000 (US$3,361,000 at the Closing Date) in consideration for Apex achieving certain levels of adjusted earnings before interest, depreciation, taxes and amortization (“EBITDA”) in the period ended July 2013. Closing costs and associated expenses either previously paid, payable in cash or recorded as deferred financing costs after the Closing Date total approximately $2.2 million, which includes the issuance of 325,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (Note 11). The shares were valued at $341,000 based on the market price of $1.05 per share on the Closing Date. Of the total amount, approximately $190,000, was reflected as deferred financing costs and the remainder was reflected as a charge to selling, general and administrative expenses in the historical financial statements of the Company as follows: 1) fourth quarter ended December 31, 2011: $46,000; 2) first quarter ended March 31, 2012: $351,000: 3) second quarter ended June 30, 2012: $1,213,000; and 4) third quarter ended September 30, 2012: $380,000 The transaction was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and the operating results for Apex have been consolidated into the Company’s results of operations beginning on June 5, 2012.  The Company funded the purchase of Apex through borrowings as further explained below.
F-31

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
The purchase price was allocated to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date. The following table summarizes the fair value of the Apex assets acquired and liabilities assumed at June 4, 2012 (in thousands):
Assets acquired:    
Accounts receivable $243 
Due from related party               412 
Other current assets                 62 
Property and equipment                 30 
Intangible assets            4,466 
Goodwill            2,449 
Total assets            7,662 
     
Liabilities assumed:    
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities               194 
Unearned revenue               297 
Deferred tax liability            1,184 
Total liabilities assumed            1,675 
  Net assets acquired $5,987 
     
Purchase consideration:    
Cash paid at closing $4,801 
Accrued earn out consideration            1,186 
Total purchase consideration $5,987 
     
Under the Purchase Agreement, the following post-closing adjustments will be made:
(a)  if the Closing Working Capital as defined in the Purchase Agreement as shown on the closing date balance sheet: (i) is less than CDN$200,000 (US$192,000 at the Closing Date), the Closing Amount shall be reduced on a dollar for dollar basis by the amount of the shortfall; (ii) is greater than CDN$200,000 (US$192,000 at the Closing Date), the Closing Amount shall be increased on a dollar for dollar basis by the amount of such excess; and (iii) is equal to than CDN$200,000 (US$192,000 at the Closing Date), there shall be no adjustment to the Closing Amount as a result of this provision; and
(b)  the Closing Amount shall be reduced on a dollar for dollar basis by the amount of any liabilities of Apex on the Closing Date as shown on the closing date balance sheet, including any taxes payable and indebtedness of Apex (other than the executory obligations under contracts and all accounts payable and accrued liabilities of Apex incurred in the ordinary course of business) and excluding any liabilities otherwise adjusted pursuant to (a) above.
Pursuant to the above, a working capital adjustment of approximately $412,000 was recorded at the Closing Date. In July of 2012, pursuant to the above arrangement, the Closing Working Capital was audited and resulted in an adjustment of $76,414 and a reduction to goodwill. The total due from the prior shareholder at December 31, 2012 is $201,000 and is reflected on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as due from related party.
F-32


DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
In addition, if EBITDA (as uniquely defined in the agreement), of Apex for the twelve months ending July 31, 2013 (“2013 EBITDA”), is equal to or less than CDN$2,000,000 (US$1,920,000 at the Closing Date), then Apex shall pay an amount, to its former owners, equal to the product of the 2013 EBITDA multiplied by four less $4,801,000 (“2013 EBITDA Basic Earn-Out Amount”), up to a maximum of CDN$3,000,000 (US$2,881,000 at the Closing Date). An amount equal to 22.22% of the 2013 EBITDA Basic Earn-Out Amount shall be paid in cash and the balance shall be paid by Apex issuing a subordinated convertible note (the “Note”).
Under the terms of the Note, Apex will pay the principal sum due on the Note in eight quarterly payments beginning on January 31, 2014 (“Installment Dates”). Interest from and after August 1, 2013, shall be paid in arrears on the last day of each calendar quarter commencing on January 31, 2014. The interest rate shall be determined as follows:
(i)  9% per annum, calculated and compounded quarterly before November 1, 2014; and
(ii)  11% per annum, calculated and compounded quarterly after October 31, 2014;
(iii)  except, however, that, if, during the term of the Note, the Company raises Net Equity Capital (as defined in the Note) in an amount greater than CDN$5,000,000 and this Note is not repaid in full within 30 days from the date that the Company receives such Net Equity Capital, the interest rate otherwise provided in the Note shall be 15% per annum from the end of such 30-day period to the first anniversary thereof and 20% per annum thereafter to the date of payment in full.
The Note is convertible, only on each Installment Date, at the option of the Note holder, into shares of our common stock at a conversion price that is equal to the greater of the market price of our common stock on the day prior to the conversion, or $1.00. The shares issuable under the Note will be restricted but will have certain piggy back registration rights as set forth in the Purchase Agreement.
If the 2013 EBITDA is greater than CDN$2,000,000 (US$1,920,000 at the Closing Date), then Apex shall pay an amount, to its former owners, (the “2013 EBITDA Additional Earn-Out Amount”) by which the dollar-for-dollar 2013 EBITDA exceeds CDN$2,000,000 ($1,920,000 at the Closing Date), up to a maximum of CDN$500,000 (US$480,000 at the Closing Date). The 2013 EBITDA Additional Earn-Out shall be paid by the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock. The number of shares to be issued shall be determined by the amount due divided by the 30 day average daily closing price of the shares of the Company’s common stock in the month of July 2013. The shares issued will be restricted but will have certain piggy back registration rights as set forth in the Purchase Agreement.
The obligations of Apex under the Purchase Agreement are guaranteed by the Company.
The 2013 EBITDA Basic Earn-Out Amount and 2013 EBITDA Additional Earn-Out Amount were recorded as additional purchase price consideration and the fair value was estimated by using a Monte Carlo simulation model to calculate the present value of the earn-out and determine the probability of reaching the earn-out milestones. The Company simulated the EBITDA in the earn-out periods by varying the following inputs:
·  
Revenue – Earn-out period revenue was simulated based on management’s projected revenue and a standard deviation based on revenue variance shown throughout management’s 2012 - 2014 projections.

·  
Cost of Goods Sold (“COGS”) Margin – Earn-out period COGS margin was simulated based on management’s projected margin and a standard deviation based on COGS margin variance shown throughout management’s 2012 - 2014 projections.
·  
General and Administrative Expenses (“G&A”) – Earn-out period G&A expense was simulated based on management’s projected G&A expense and a standard deviation based on G&A expenses variance shown throughout management’s 2012 - 2014 projections.  Such G&A amounts are limited with respect to the calculation based on the terms of the agreement.
F-33

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Once the EBITDA was simulated in the earn-out period, the Company then determined the amount of the 2013 EBITDA Basic Earn-Out and the 2013 EBITDA Additional Earn-Out that was achieved.
The present value of the total earn-out amount was calculated using a discount rate of 19.7%. The discount rate was determined based on: (i) a discount rate of 16.0% based on the cost of equity less 2.0 percent specific risk premium since the Earn-Out period is only for one year, plus (ii) a counterparty risk of 3.7% based on the after-tax estimated cost of debt. The fair value of the earn-out was calculated to be approximately CDN$1,076,000 (US$1,033,000 at the Closing Date). At December 31, 2012, the Company revised the analysis of earn-out consideration taking in to account actual results and projected results for the remainder of the earn-out period.  Based on that analysis, the Company has not adjusted the earn-out accrual totaling CDN$ 1,076,000 (US$1,079,000 at December 31, 2012).
As part of the Purchase Agreement, we are obligated to pay an additional bonus consideration to the CEO of Apex. Such bonus is considered additional contingent purchase consideration as we are obligated to pay the bonus regardless of whether or not his employment is retained. The fair value of the bonus was calculated to be approximately CDN$160,000 (US$153,000 at the Closing Date). At December 31, 2012, the Company revised the analysis of the bonus taking in to account actual results and projected results for the remainder of the bonus period. Based on that analysis, the Company has not adjusted the bonus accrual totaling CDN$160,000 (US$160,000 at December 31, 2012).
As part of the Purchase Agreement, from the Closing Date up until the expiry of the bonus period, the Company is obligated to escrow 25% of any Equity Capital raised in excess of $500,000.  The funds in the escrow are to be used to pay the 2013 EBITDA Basic Earn-Out and the 2013 EBITDA Additional Earn-Out and the additional bonus consideration.  In December 2012, the Company raised $7,042,000 as part of the Series D Purchase Agreement. The Apex Stock Purchase Agreement requires 25% of net offering proceeds, as defined, to be placed in an escrow account to satisfy the payment obligations of certain earn-out provisions. These funds have not been placed into escrow pending agreement between the Company and the sellers of Apex regarding the financial institution that will escrow the funds, the amount of funds that are to be placed in escrow and the escrow agreement itself.
The fair value at June 4, 2012, of the intangible assets acquired and the estimated useful lives over which they are being amortized are (in thousands):
  Fair Value Estimated Useful life
     
Apex Ware Software $2,483 3.5 years
Customer relationships  1,536 9 years
Trade name  432 7 years
Covenant not to compete  15 1 years
      
  $4,466  
      
The fair value of proprietary software was derived under the cost approach based on the value of replacing the software with software with similar functionality.  Trade name fair value was determined using a relief from royalty method based on the expected future revenue streams.  The fair value of customer relationships was determined using the estimated future cash flows attributable to existing customers.  The fair value of the covenant not to compete was calculated as the present value of the income expected to be generated as a result of the covenanters not competing with the business.
Amortization of the APEXWare™ software is calculated as the greater of the proportional revenue approach or the straight-line approach. Amortization of customer relationships and trade names are calculated on the discounted cash flow methodology to more properly reflect the greater useful life of the assets in the early years and the covenant not to compete is amortized on a straight-line basis.
The transaction resulted in a purchase price residual at the Closing date of approximately $2,449,000 for goodwill, representing the financial, strategic and operational value of the transaction to DecisionPoint. Goodwill is attributed to the premium that the Company was willing to pay to obtain the value of the Apex business and the synergies created with the integration of key components of a commercial infrastructure. The total amount of the goodwill acquired is not deductible for tax purposes.
F-34

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
On June 4, 2012, Apex entered into a Credit Agreement (“RBC Credit Agreement”) with Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”), pursuant to which RBC made available certain credit facilities in the aggregate amount of up to CDN$2,750,000 (US$2,641,000 at the Closing date), including a revolving demand facility with an authorized limit of CDN$200,000 (US$192,000 at the Closing Date). In addition, Apex entered into a Loan Agreement (”BDC Loan Agreement”) with BDC Capital Inc. (“BDC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Business Development Bank of Canada, pursuant to which BDC made available to Apex a term credit facility (“BDC Credit Facility”) in the aggregate amount of CDN$1,700,000 (US$1,632,000 at the Closing Date). Further, the Company drew amounts under our line of credit with SVB to fund the remainder of the cash purchase price.  See Note 9 for further discussion of these agreements.
Pro Forma Financial Information (unaudited):
The following summarizes the Company’s unaudited consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 as if the Apex and Illume Mobile acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2011:2018 (in thousands, except per share data):
  December 31, 
  2012  2011  2012  2011 
  as reported  pro forma 
             
Net sales $71,501  $58,359  $73,703  $62,024 
Net loss attributable to common shareholders  (4,820)  (5,654)  (6,887)  (8,441)
                 
Net loss per share - basic and diluted  (0.61)  (0.94)  (0.87)  (1.21)
                 
Included in the pro forma combined results of operations are the following adjustments for Apex: (i) amortization of intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2012

  2019  2018 
Net income attributable to common stockholders $890  $3,975 
         
Weighted average basic shares outstanding  13,415   9,504 
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock  1,926   1,824 
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share  15,341   11,328 
         
Basic income per share $0.07  $0.42 
Diluted income per share $0.06  $0.35 

Note 5: Property and 2011 of $572,000 and $1,392,000, respectively, (ii) a net increase in interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 of $291,000 and $708,000, respectively.

Included in the pro forma combined results of operations are the following adjustments for Illume Mobile: (i) amortization of intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 of $125,000 and $214,000, respectively. Net loss per share assumes the 325,000 shares issued in connection with the Apex acquisition and the 617,284 shares issued in connection with the Illume Mobile acquisition are outstanding for each period presented (see discussion at Note 4).
The historical financial information of Apex has been extracted for the periods required from the historical financial statements of Apex Systems Integrators, Inc. which were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  The historical financial information of Illume Mobile has been derived from using internally generated management reports for the periods required.
The unaudited pro forma financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of the Company’s consolidated results of operations that would have been reported had the Apex and Illume Mobile acquisitions been completed as of the beginning of the period presented, nor should it be taken as indicative of the Company’s future consolidated results of operations.
The combined amounts of Apex and Illume Mobile’s revenue and net loss since the respective acquisition dates included in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $1.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively.
F-35


DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 5 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Equipment

Property and equipment consistsconsist of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

  December 31, 
  2012  2011 
       
Computer equipment $238  $145 
Office furniture and fixtures  113   84 
Leasehold improvements  43   44 
Total property and equipment  394   273 
         
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  (215)  (174)
         
Property and equipment, net $179  $99 

  2019  2018 
Computer equipment $366  $230 
Furniture and fixtures  131   114 
Leasehold improvements  98   78 
Property and equipment, gross  595   422 
Accumulated depreciation  (356)  (282)
Property and equipment, net $239  $140 

Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment for the years ended December 31, 20122019 and 2011,2018, totaled $67,000,$76,000 and $45,000,$56,000, respectively.

F-15

NOTE 6 – GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Company allocates the cost of its acquisitions

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The excess cost over the acquired fair value of the identified net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.

Goodwill is tested annually during the fourth fiscal quarter and whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value, estimated based on discounted cash flow analyses, an impairment charge would be recorded. Based on the results of the annual impairment tests, no impairment of goodwill existed at December 31, 2012.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows (in thousands):
Balance as of January 1, 2011 $5,509 
     Adjustment to goodwill related to CMAC  29 
     
Balance as of December 31, 2011  5,538 
Acquisition of Apex in June  2,449 
Adjustment to Apex goodwill  37 
Tax adjustment to Apex goodwill  (9)
Acquisition of Illume in July  444 
Impact of foreign currency translation  112 
     
Balance as of December 31, 2012 $8,571 
     
F-36






DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012

Note 6: Accrued Expenses and 2011

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, the Company’s intangible assets and accumulated amortization consist of the following (in thousands):
  December 31, 
  2012  2011 
     Accumulated     WA     Accumulated     WA 
  Gross  Amortization  Net  Life  Gross  Amortization  Net  Life 
                         
Customer relationships $3,373  $(966) $2,407   7.6  $1,670  $(279) $1,391   8.0 
Contractor and resume databases  675   (270)  405   3.0   675   (135)  540   4.0 
Tradename  893   (193)  700   5.3   310   (64)  246   4.0 
Internal use software  2,978   (545)  2,433   3.1   74   (37)  37   1.0 
Covenant not to compete  105   (27)  78   1.5   -   -   -   - 
                                 
  $8,024  $(2,001) $6,023   5.1  $2,729  $(515) $2,214   6.5 
                                 
Amortization expense for intangible assets was $1,486,000 and $515,000 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  The effect of foreign currency translation on the intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $199,000 and $0, respectively. Amortization is calculated over the estimated useful lives of the assets on a straight line basis for covenant not to compete, internal use software and contractor and resume databases, and on an accelerated basis for customer relationships and trade name.
Based on the current amount of intangibles subject to amortization, estimated amortization expense in the next five years and thereafter, is as follows (in thousands):
    
Year Amount 
    
2013 $1,934 
2014  1,663 
2015  1,420 
2016  333 
2017  255 
Thereafter  418 
     
  Total $6,023 
NOTE 7 - ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

  December 31, 
  2012  2011 
       
Salaries and benefits $1,937  $1,633 
Interest payable  139   58 
Professional fees  33   80 
Vendor purchases  92   301 
Sales tax payable  293   230 
Customer deposits  139   75 
Other fees and expenses  262   128 
         
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities $2,895  $2,505 
         
F-37

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated

  2019  2018 
Salaries and benefits $1,002  $992 
Accrued earn out obligation related to acquisition (Note 3)  500   670 
Sales tax payable  269   174 
Professional fees  149   133 
Vendor purchases  140   51 
Customer deposits  137   53 
Other  25   46 
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities $2,222  $2,119 

Note 7: Line of Credit

In August 2016, we entered into a $6.0 million three-year revolving credit facility with Pacific Western Business Finance (“PWBF”) formerly known as CapitalSource Business Financial Statements

December 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 8 – LINE OF CREDIT
Group. The Company has a $10.0 million revolving line of credit with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) which provides for borrowings based upon eligible accounts receivable, as defined inbears interest at the Loan Agreement (“SVB Loan Agreement”). Under the SVB Loan Agreement as amended, SVB has also provided the Company with a term loan as discussedprime rate plus 1.25% (6.00% at Note 9. The SVB Loan Agreement is secured by substantially all the assets of the Company and was scheduled to mature in February 2013. As of December 31, 20122019 and 2011, the outstanding balance on the line of credit is approximately $3.3 million and $4.0 million and the interest rate is 7.5%. The Amended SVB Loan Agreement includes various customary covenants, limitations and events of default. Financial covenants, among others, include liquidity and fixed charge coverage ratios, minimum tangible net worth requirements and limitations on indebtedness.  As of December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.
Availability under the line of credit was approximately $5.0 million6.75% as of December 31, 2012. As discussed in Note 9, on February 27, 20132018), and is secured by all our U.S. assets. In June 2018, the Company obtained an additional term loan of $1.0credit facility was amended increasing the revolving credit facility to $7.25 million which reduces the maximum availability under the line of credit by 50% of the amount outstanding underand extending the term loan. The line of credit allows the Company to cause the issuance of letters of credit on account of the Company to a maximum of the borrowing base as defined in the Loan Agreement. No letters of credit were outstanding as ofAugust 2020. At December 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011.
On February 27, 2013, the SVB Loan Agreement was amended to provide for 1) an extension of the termination date of the line of credit to February 28, 2015, 2) the modification of the line of credit borrowing base, advance rate2019 and financial covenants, 3) the inclusion of an additional $1.0 million term loan (See further discussion at Note 9), 4) a modification of the rate of interest of the line of credit to 3.75% above the bank’s prime rate and 5) other various terms and provisions.
Under the RBC Credit Agreement, the revolving demand facility allows for borrowings up to CDN$200,000 (US$ 192,000 at the Closing Date) based upon eligible accounts receivable. Interest is based on the Royal Bank Prime (“RBP”) plus 1.5% and is payable on demand.  As of December 31, 2012,2018, the outstanding balance on the line of credit was $168,000 and the interest rate is 4.5%. The RBC Credit Agreement is secured by the assets of Apex. The revolving demand facility has certain financial covenants and other non-financial covenants. As ofapproximately $3.2 million. At December 31, 2012, Apex2019, availability under the line of credit was not in compliance with the Fixed Charge Coverage ratio covenant as defined in the RBC Credit Agreement.  In March 2013, the Company receivedapproximately $2.9 million, which is determined from a waiver for non-compliance of this covenant through March 31, 2013 and has received communication that the bank will work with the Company to reset this specific covenant commencing with the quarter ending June 30, 2013, however there are no assurances that this will occur.

borrowing base calculation on our existing accounts receivable balance.

For the years ended December 31, 20122019 and 2011,2018, our interest expense on the Company’s interest expense,revolving credit facility, including fees paid to secure lines of credit, totaled approximately $375,000$215,000 and $357,000,$300,000, respectively.

RBC

Note 8: Term Debt

Subordinated Promissory Notes

In October 2018, we completed a private placement of subordinated promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1,500,000. These promissory notes carry an interest rate of 12% per annum, are not collateralized, and SVBrequire quarterly interest payments with a maturity date of April 30, 2021. In connection with these notes, we issued warrants to the placement agent to purchase 52,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.70 per share. The fair value of the warrants was $18,000 (See Note 10). In addition, we issued 525,000 shares of our common stock to note holders. The estimated fair value of these shares was $262,500 and such amount has been presented as a debt discount and is being amortized to interest expense through the maturity date of the promissory notes.

In August and September 2019, we paid $1,000,000 in principal amount against the outstanding subordinated promissory notes, leaving a balance of $500,000 as of December 31, 2019. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, our interest expense on term debt, including amortization of deferred financing costs, were approximately $240,000 and $116,000, respectively.

PWBF Promissory Notes

In August 2016, we entered into a subordination agreement, pursuantseparate promissory note with PWBF with a principal amount of $500,000. This promissory note carried an annual interest rate of prime rate plus 1.25% (6.00% as of December 31, 2019 and 6.75% as of December 31, 2018) with a maturity date of August 1, 2019. In January 2019, this promissory note was paid in full.

In June 2018, we entered into another promissory note with PWBF with a principal amount of $750,000. This promissory note carries an annual interest rate of prime rate plus 1.25% (6.00% at December 31, 2019 and 6.75% at December 31, 2018) with a maturity date of August 25, 2020. Principal payments are due and payable monthly as follows in 26 consecutive payments each in the amount of $20,834 beginning June 25, 2018; and one payment of $208,333 due on the maturity date of August 25, 2020.

F-16

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to which RBC agreedthe Consolidated Financial Statements

We are required to subordinate any security interestmaintain a financial covenant in assets of the Company granted in connectionaccordance with the RBC Credit AgreementPWBR promissory note. The financial covenant requires a Fixed Charge Ratio not less than 1.2 to SVB’s security1.0 as of each month-end, determined on a trailing 12-month basis, with “Fixed Charge Ratio” defined as (a) EBITDA (net income before interest in assetsexpense, taxes, depreciation and amortization) less cash paid for income taxes, owner distributions, earnout payments and all unfinanced capital expenditures, divided by (b) the aggregate of principal and interest payments, and all other fees, costs and expenses paid or payable to PWBF related to the Company.

Under the RBC Credit Agreement, the lender provided Apex with a term loan as discussed at Note 9.
F-38

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
promissory note.

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011

NOTE 9 – LONG TERM DEBT
Long2019, we were in compliance with the financial covenant.

The following table sets forth our outstanding term debt as of December 31 2012 and 2011, consists of the following (in thousands):

           Amortization  Effect of       
  Balance        of Note  Currency  Conversion  Balance 
  January 1, 2012  Additions  Payments  Discount  Translation  to Equity  December 31, 2012 
                      
RBC term loan $-  $2,401  $(419) $-  $108  $-  $2,090 
note discount  -   (58)  -   20   -   -   (38)
BDC term loan  -   1,632   -   -   73   -   1,705 
note discount  -   (34)  -   3   -   -   (31)
SVB term loan  2,000   -   (1,000)  -   -   -   1,000 
note discount  (30)  -   -   26   -   -   (4)
                             
Total debt $1,970  $3,941  $(1,419) $49  $181  $-   4,722 
                             
less current portion                          (1,800)
                             
Debt, net of current portion                         $2,922 
                             
              Amortization             
  Balance          of Note  Currency  Conversion  Balance 
  January 1, 2011  Additions  Payments  Discount  Translation  to Equity  December 31, 2011 
                             
Senior subordinated secured note $-  $4,000  $-  $-  $-  $(4,000) $- 
                             
BDC term loan  -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
                             
SVB term loan  3,000   -   (1,000)  -   -   -   2,000 
note discount  (60)  -   -   30   -   -   (30)
                             
Total debt $2,940  $4,000  $(1,000) $30  $-  $(4,000)  1,970 
                             
less current portion                          (1,000)
                             
Debt, net of current portion                         $970 
                             
The Company’s

  Maturity Date 2019  2018 
Subordinated promissory notes April 30, 2021 $500  $1,500 
PWBF promissory note August 25, 2020  144   604 
PWBF promissory note August 1, 2019     178 
Less:  Unamortized discount    (110)  (372)
Total term debt   $534  $1,910 

Total following table sets forth future principal payments under the term debt is recorded at par value adjusted for any unamortized discounts.  described above are as follows (in thousands):

2020 $144 
2021  500 
Total minimum payments  644 
Unamortized discount and issuance costs  (110)
Less: Current portion of note payable  (144)
Note payable, net of current portion $390 

Debt Discount

Discounts and costs directly related to the issuance of debt are capitalizedpresented against the related debt instrument and amortized over the life of the debt using the effective interest rate method as interest expense.

Total debt discount amortization was $260,000 and $30,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 respectively. Debt discount amortization is recordedincluded in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  Unamortized deferred financing costs of approximately $107,000income and $90,000 are included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

As of December 31, 2012, maturities of long-term obligations for the next five fiscal years are as follows (in thousands):
Year Amount 
    
2013 $1,800 
2014  815 
2015  407 
2016  1,700 
     
  Total $4,722 
RBC Term Loan -- On June 4, 2012, Apex entered into the RBC Credit Agreement with RBC described in Notes 4 and 8, pursuant to which RBC made available certain credit facilities in the aggregate amount of up to CDN$2,750,000, including a term facility (“RBC Term Loan”) in the amount of CDN $2,500,000 (US$2,401,000 at the Closing Date). The RBC Term Loan accrues interest at RBP plus 4% (7% at December 31, 2012). Principal and interest is payable over a three year period at a fixed principal amount of CDN $70,000 a month beginning in July 2012 and continuing through June 2015. Apex paid approximately $120,000 in financing costs, which has been recorded as deferred financing costs or note discount in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012, and is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the loan.
F-39

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
In addition, the RBC Term Loan calls for mandatory repayments based on 20% of Apex’s free cash flow as defined in the RBC Credit Agreement, before discretionary bonuses based on the annual year end audited financial statements of Apex, beginning with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, and payable within 30 days of the delivery of the annual audited financial statements, and continuing every six months through December 31, 2014. This amount is estimated to be $0 at December 31, 2012.
The RBC Term Loan has certain financial covenants and other non-financial covenants. As of December 31, 2012, Apex was not in compliance with the Fixed Charge Coverage ratio covenant as defined in the Term Loan.  In March 2013, the Company received a waiver for non-compliance of this covenant  through March 31, 2013 and has received communication that the bank will work with the Company to reset this specific covenant commencing with the quarter ending June 30, 2013, however there are no assurances that this will occur.

BDC Term Loan -- On June 4, 2012, Apex also entered into the BDC Loan Agreement as described in comprehensive income.

Note 4, pursuant to which BDC made available to Apex a term credit facility (“BDC Term Loan”) in the aggregate amount of CDN $1,700,000 (USD $1,632,000 at the Closing Date). The BDC Term Loan accrues interest at the rate of 12% per annum, and matures on June 23, 2016, with an available one year extension for a fee of 2%, payable at the time of extension. In addition to the interest payable, consecutive quarterly payments of CDN$20,000 as additional interest are due beginning on June 23, 2012, and subject to compliance with bank covenants, Apex will make a mandatory annual principal payment in the form of a cash flow sweep which will be equal to 50% of the Excess Available Funds (as defined by the BDC Loan Agreement) before discretionary bonuses based on the annual year end audited financial statements of Apex. The maximum annual cash flow sweep in any year will be CDN$425,000. As of December 31, 2012, the Company estimates that the cash sweep will be approximately $0. Such payments will be applied to reduce the outstanding principal payment due on the maturity date. In the event that Apex’s annual audited financial statements are not received within 120 days of its fiscal year end, the full CDN$425,000 becomes due and payable on the next payment date. Apex paid approximately $70,000 in financing costs which has been recorded as deferred financing costs in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012, and is being amortized to interest expense over the term of the loan.

The terms of the BDC loan agreement also provide for a fee to BDC in the event of the occurrence of any of the following:
(a)  if 50% or more of any company comprising Apex or the Company (consolidated assets or shares) is sold or merged with an unrelated entity; or
(b)  if there is a change of control of Apex and/or the Company prior to the Maturity Date or any extended maturity date of the BDC Tern Loan,
In the event of (a) or (b) above, Apex will pay to the BDC a bonus in an amount equal to 2% of the aggregate value of Apex and the Company determined as at the closing date of such transaction, which bonus shall become due and payable at the time of the closing of such transaction. Notwithstanding any prepayment of the BDC Term Loan, the bonus and Apex’s obligation to pay same to the BDC will remain in full force and effect until the maturity date or any amended or extended maturity date agreed by the BDC such that in the event of any sale, initial public offering or similar transaction, Apex’s obligation to pay the bonus amount to the BDC will survive such prepayment.
In connection with the BDC Loan Agreement, the RBC Credit Agreement, and the Purchase Agreement, on June 4, 2012, the Company entered into a consent and waiver agreement (“Consent and Waiver”) with Sigma Opportunity Fund II, LLC (“Sigma Opportunity Fund”), Sigma Capital Advisors (“Sigma Advisors”), and Donald W. Rowley (the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer) (Note 11). On October 3, 2012, the parties entered into an amended consent and waiver agreement (“Amended Consent and Waiver Agreement”).
F-40

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
The BDC Loan Agreement contains certain financial and non-financial covenants.  As of December 31, 2012, Apex was not in compliance with their financial covenants.  In March 2013, the Company received a waiver for non-compliance of their financial covenants through March 31, 2013 and has received communication that the bank will work with the Company to reset this specific covenant commencing with the quarter ending June 30, 2013, however there are no assurances that this will occur.
SVB Term Loan -  On December 31, 2010, pursuant to an Assumption and Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement ("Amended SVB Loan Agreement"), the Company borrowed $3.0 million from Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”). The SVB Term Loan was due in 36 equal monthly installments of principal plus interest beginning on February 1, 2011. The SVB Term Loan is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company except for the assets of Apex.  On May 20, 2011, pursuant to a Consent and Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement (“Amendment”), the maturity date was amended to April 30, 2012, with the remaining principal due on that date to be paid as a balloon payment. See below for amendment on September 27, 2011. The principal amount outstanding under the Term Loan accrues interest at a fixed rate equal to 9% per annum. In addition, a final payment equal to 2% of the aggregate amount of the Term Loan is due on the earlier of the maturity date or the date the Term Loan is prepaid. This final payment of $60,000 has been recorded as a discount to the SVB Term Loan, which is being amortized to interest expense through December 2013, using the effective interest method.
The Amended SVB Loan Agreement includes various customary covenants, limitations and events of default. Financial covenants, among others, include liquidity and fixed charge coverage ratios, minimum tangible net worth requirements and limitations on indebtedness. As of December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all of its covenants.
On September 27, 2011, pursuant to a Limited Waiver and Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, the Loan Agreement was amended and certain covenants were replaced or modified resulting in the Company being in full compliance at September 30, 2011. In addition, the maturity date was extended to the earlier of the maturity of the line of credit (see Note 8) or December 1, 2013, the original maturity of the SVB Term Loan and the principal is due in equal installments with no balloon payment.
On February 27, 2013, the Company amended the Loan and Security Agreement which provided an additional term loan of $1,000,000. The new term loan is due in 36 monthly installments of principal plus accrued interest beginning on April 1, 2013. The additional term loan accrues interest at 7.5% per annum.
For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s interest expense on the term debt, including amortization of deferred financing costs, was approximately $509,000 and $524,000, respectively.
Senior Subordinated Secured Note - On May 18, 2011, the Company entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company issued a $4,000,000 Senior Subordinated Secured Note (the “Note”).  Principal and interest at a rate of 12% was originally due and payable on August 31, 2011.  Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on June 15, 2011, the consummation date of the Merger, the maturity date of the Note was extended to May 31, 2012, and the interest rate was increased to 24% retroactive to the issuance date.  Total cash received under the Purchase Agreement was approximately $3,700,000, net of fees.  In conjunction with and as a condition of the Purchase Agreement, the Company and the Note holder entered into an advisory services agreement pursuant to which the Company paid $150,000 in cash on the effective date of the agreement and $80,000 in cash upon consummation of the Merger.  Upon the consummation of the Merger on June 15, 2011, the Company issued 25,000 common shares as settlement of the $80,000 cash payment.  The fair value of the common shares of $2.30 or $57,500 was recorded as equity, and the difference of $22,500 was included as a reduction in the loss on debt extinguishment as described below.
On June 30, 2011, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with the Note holder pursuant to which the Company issued 1,286,667 shares of its Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred”) with a fair value of $3.73 per share, or $4,799,000, in exchange for the surrender and cancellation of the Note and payment of accrued interest of $117,000.  In connection with the Exchange Agreement, the Company also issued 505,000 shares of common stock on June 30, 2011, with a closing market price of $2.30 per share, or $1,161,000, for no additional consideration.  In addition, the Note holder received protective anti-dilution rights which entitles it to receive additional shares if at any time the Company is required, pursuant solely to the Merger Agreement as described Note 1, to issue additional shares of common stock to its shareholders as is necessary for the Note holder to maintain the same beneficial ownership percentage, on a fully diluted basis, as they had before any such additional shares were issued.  On September 30, 2011, pursuant to these protective anti-dilution rights, the Company issued 105,700 shares with a value of $243,000.  The shares were valued at $2.30 per share, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on June 30, 2011.  The expense related to the issuance of the shares was recorded as a loss on debt extinguishment in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011.
F-41

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, the Company had a contingent obligation to issue up to a maximum of 500,000 shares of its common stock to the Note holder.  The contingency was dependent upon the receipt by the Company of payments on the note receivable and other receivable acquired pursuant to the Merger with Comamtech.  The Exchange Agreement defines certain thresholds for the amounts of these payments, the receipt of which would lower the number of common shares to be contingently issued on an incremental basis.  Based upon the probability that the threshold amount expected to be received would result in no additional shares being issued, the fair value per share was estimated to be $0.
In conjunction with the Exchange Agreement, the Company also entered into an agreement between the Company, the Note holder, and the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer, (“CFO”).  Pursuant to this agreement, the Company issued 128,667 shares of Series C Preferred and 49,000 shares of common stock to the former CFO as settlement of $400,000 of accrued expenses and $12,000 of accrued interest owed to the former CFO.  In addition, the former CFO was issued shares of common stock in an amount equal to an aggregate of ten percent (10%) of any additional shares of common stock issued to the Note holder as described above.  The Company expensed $24,000 for the issuance of an additional 10,400 common shares to the former CFO.  The shares were valued at $2.30 per share, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on June 30, 2011.  The expense related to the issuance of the shares was recorded as a loss on debt extinguishment in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011.  In conjunction with Exchange Agreement the interest rate on the balance of the payable to the former CFO was reduced to 12% per annum until such time as the annual dividend rate on the Series C Preferred was increased,  as defined.  The Series C Preferred was redeemed by the Company in December 2012.
The Exchange Agreement was accounted for as a debt extinguishment as the exchange was effected by issuance of common and preferred stock that did not represent the exercise of a conversion right contained in the terms of the debt at issuance.  The Company determined that the loss on exchange of debt was substantial by comparing the carrying value of the debt extinguished to the fair value of the consideration tendered, and recorded $2,665,000 as a loss on debt extinguishment.
The loss was the result of the difference between the fair value of the consideration given and the carrying value of the senior subordinated secured note extinguished, as follows (in thousands):
Fair value of consideration tendered in extinguishment   
Series C Preferred $5,279 
Common stock                 1,332 
Expense related to issuance of anti-dilution shares                   267 
Expenses related to senior subordinated secured note                   396 
                  7,274 
Carrying value of debt extinguished    
Senior subordinated secured note and related accrued interest                4,117 
Related party accounts payable and accrued interest                   412 
Advisory services payable related to senior subordinated secured note                     80 
                  4,609 
     
Total loss on extinguishment of debt $2,665 
F-42

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
NOTE 10 - INCOME TAXES
9: Income Taxes

The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 20122019 and 20112018 is as follows (in thousands):

  2019  2018 
Current:        
Federal $  $ 
State  45   28 
   45   28 
Deferred:        
Federal  230   (3,223)
State  35   (688)
   265   (3,911)
Total income tax expense (benefit) $310  $(3,883)

F-17

  December 31, 
  2012  2011 
Current income tax expense (benefit):      
Federal $-  $- 
State  63   18 
Foreign  68   - 
   131   18 
Deferred income tax expense (benefit):        
Federal  16   (294)
State  6   12 
Foreign  (278)  - 
   (256)  (282)
         
Valuation allowance  -   364 
         
Total income tax expense (benefit) $(125) $100 
         
The Company’s

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Our deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):

  December 31, 
  2012  2011 
       
Allowance for doubtful accounts $98  $86 
Inventory reserve and uniform capitalization  44   76 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities  365   170 
Unearned revenue  226   992 
Valuation allowance  (685)  (1,324)
Deferred tax assets - current  48   - 
         
Other assets  42   4 
Property and equipment  5   7 
Intangibles  405   178 
Net operating loss carryforward  2,009   1,671 
Valuation allowance  (2,459)  (1,860)
Deferred tax assets - long term  2   - 
         
Total net deferred tax asset $50  $- 
         
Long term debt  (18)  - 
Intangibles  (1,022)  - 
Goodwill  (40)  (18)
         
Total net deferred tax liability $(1,080) $(18)
         
  Total $(1,030) $(18)
         
F-43

 DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011

  2019  2018 
Allowance for doubtful accounts $10  $12 
Inventory reserve and uniform capitalization  49   27 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities  625   621 
Deferred revenue  (539)  (740)
Other assets  117   114 
Property and equipment  (19)  5 
Intangibles  99   119 
Goodwill  (36)  (36)
Net operating loss carryforwards  2,941   3,390 
Total deferred tax assets  3,247   3,512 
Valuation allowance  (588)  (588)
Net deferred tax assets after valuation allowance $2,659  $2,924 

A reconciliation of the United States statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 20122019 and 20112018 is as follows (in thousands):

  December 31, 2012  December 31, 2011 
  Amount  Rate (%)  Amount  Rate (%) 
Tax at the Federal statutory rate $(1,357)  34.0  $(1,723)  34.0 
State taxes  (130)  3.3   18   (0.4)
Permanent differences  752   (18.9)  1,426   (28.2)
Valuation allowance  147   (3.7)  364   (7.2)
True up items  288   (7.2)  -   - 
Miscellaneous  22   (0.6)  15   (0.2)
Stock transaction  57   (1.4)  -   - 
Foreign rate  96   (2.4)  -   - 
Effective tax rate $(125)  3.1  $100   (2.0)
                 

  2019  2018 
Federal taxes at statutory rate $252  $19 
State and local income taxes  76   22 
Permanent differences     34 
Valuation allowance  (33)  (3,891)
Change in statutory rate  15   (67)
Provision for income taxes $310  $(3,883)
Effective tax rate  25.9%  >100% 

In December 2017, the Tax Act was signed into law. The Company’sAct amended the Internal Revenue Code to reduce tax rates and modify policies, credits, and deductions for individuals and businesses. For businesses, the Tax Act reduced the corporate federal tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat 21% rate. The rate reduction took effect on January 1, 2018. We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

In 2018, as a result of the reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 34% to 21% under the Tax Act, we revalued our deferred tax assets and liabilities, as well as related valuation allowances.

The Tax Act contains various other rules that may apply to us; for example, 100% bonus depreciation is allowable on certain qualifying assets placed in service after September 27, 2017, the Tax Act denies a deduction for certain entertainment expenditures incurred after December 31, 2017, and net operating losses incurred after this date are subject to certain new limitations. Our current year income tax provision takes these new rules into account to the extent they are applicable.

Our deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. These assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.

F-18

The Company has

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have net operating loss carryforwards available in certain jurisdictions to reduce future taxable income. Future tax benefits for net operating loss carryforwards are recognized to the extent that realization of these benefits is considered more likely than not. This determination is based on the expectation that related operations will be sufficiently profitable or various tax business and other planning strategies will enable the Companyus to utilize the net operating loss carryforwards. The Company’sOur evaluation of the realizability of deferred tax assets considers both positive and negative evidence. The weight given to potential effects of positive and negative evidence is based on the extent to which it can be objectively verified. For the years endedAs of December 31, 20122019 and 2011, the Company2018, we recorded a valuation allowance related to the USU.S. federal and state temporary items of approximately $0.6 million as it was determined it is more likely than not that the Companywe will not be able to fully use the assets to reduce future tax liabilities. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded no allowance related to foreign temporary items as it was determined it is more likely than not that the Company will be able to fully use the assets to reduce future tax liabilities.

A reconciliation

Utilization of the beginning and ending amountnet operating loss carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code under section 382. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):

Balance as of December 31, 2011 $- 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year  170 
Additions for tax positions of prior years  - 
Reductions for tax positions of prior years  - 
     
Balance as of December 31, 2012 $170 
     
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. During the fiscal years December 31, 2012, the Company recognized approximately $170,000 in liabilities related to tax positions taken by Apex, a foreign subsidiary acquired in 2012.
F-44

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
net operating loss carryforwards before utilization. As of December 31, 2012, the Company2019, we had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $5.9$12.2 million and $5.2$7.4 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, we had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $14.0 million and $7.1 million, respectively. These loss carryforwards will expire in varying amounts beginning 2025 through 2032. Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, as amended, or (“the Code”), generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that might be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant changes in stock ownership. 2037.

We have determined that we have experienced multiple ownership changes under Section 382 of the Code. As of December 31, 2012, we estimated that approximately $5.1 million of U.S. federal net operating losses and $4.7 million of state net operating losses may be utilized in the future based on limitations that we have calculated under Section 382 of the Code.

The Company continuescontinue to remain subject to examination by U.S. federal authority for the years 20092017 through 20122019 and for various state authorities for the years 20092016 through 2012,2019, with few exceptions.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) was enacted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company is subjectCARES Act permits net operating loss (“NOL”) carryovers and carrybacks to U.S. federaloffset 100% of taxable income for taxable years beginning before 2021. In addition, the CARES Act allows NOLs incurred in 2018, 2019, and Canadian2020 to be carried back to each of the five preceding taxable years to generate a refund of previously paid income taxes. The Act has also made significant changes to depreciation rules and interest deduction limitation rules, among other provision.  We have evaluated the provisions of the CARES Act and we do not expect that the NOL carryback provision or any other tax as well as income taxesrelated provisions of the Act would result in various state jurisdictions.

NOTE 11 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
The Company isa material benefit to us.

Note 10: Stockholders’ Equity

We are authorized to issue two classes of stock designated as common stock and preferred stock. As of December 31, 2012, the Company is2019, we are authorized to issue 110,000,00060,000,000 total shares of stock. Of thatthis amount, 100,000,00050,000,000 shares are common stock, each having a par value of $0.001.  The remaining$0.001 and 10,000,000 shares are preferred stock, each having a par value of $0.001, of which 500,000 shares are designated as Series A $0.001.

Preferred Stock of which 269,608 are issued

At December 31, 2019 and outstanding, 500,0002018, there were no shares are designated as Series B Preferred Stock, of which 131,347 are issued and outstanding, 5,000,000 shares are designated as Series C Preferred Stock, of which 0 shares are issued and outstanding and, 4,000,000 shares are designated as Series D Preferred Stock, of which 704,200 shares are issued and outstanding.

(a) Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
A summary of preferred stock outstanding as ofoutstanding.

Common Stock

At December 31, 2012 is as follows (in thousands, except share data):

Description    
     
Series A Preferred, $0.001 par value per share, 500,000 shares designated,   
269,608 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation preference of $975   
plus cumulative dividends of $285$1,260 
Series B Preferred, $0.001 par value per share, 500,000 shares designated,   
131,347 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation preference of $380   
plus cumulative dividends of $62                      442 
Series D Preferred, $0.001 par value per share, 4,000,000 shares designated,   
704,200 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation preference of $7,042   
(net of $1,374 in issuance costs) plus cumulative dividends of $14                   5,668 
     
Total convertible preferred stock$7,370 
     
Series A Preferred Stock2019 and Series B Preferred Stock
The holders2018, there was 13,576,223 and 12,874,973 shares of the Series A and Series B Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive, when, as, and if declared by the Boardcommon stock outstanding, respectively.

In January 2019, we issued 1,250 shares of Directors, dividends at an annual ratecommon stock for proceeds of 8% of the stated value. The stated value of the Series A Preferred is $4.00 per share and the stated value of the Series B Preferred is $3.20 per share. Dividends shall be cumulative and shall accrue on each share of the outstanding preferred stock from the date of its issue.

The holders of the Series A and Series B Preferred Stock have no voting rights except on matters affecting their rights or preferences. Subject$1,175 in cash related to the rightsexercise of the Series D Preferred Stock, upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-upstock options.

In March 2019, we granted a stock award of the Company, the holders of the Series A (subject to the rights of the Series B Preferred) and Series B Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive an amount equal to the stated value per share of $4.00 and $3.20, respectively, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends before any payments shall be made to the holders of any common stock or hereinafter issued preferred stock. The Series A Preferred Stock has preference over the Series B Preferred Stock in liquidation.

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $4.00 per share. Each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, at a conversion price of $3.20 per share.
Series C Preferred Stock
On December 20, 2012, all issued and outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock were redeemed using the proceeds generated from the sale of the Series D Preferred Stock.
F-45

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011

Series D Preferred Stock
In connection with the Series D Closing, on December 20, 2012, we filed a Certificate of Designation of Series D Preferred Shares (the “Series D Certificate of Designation”) with the Secretary of State of Delaware. Pursuant to the Series D Certificate of Designation, we designated 4,000,000 shares of our preferred stock as Series D Preferred Stock. The Series D Preferred Stock has a Stated Value of $10.00 per share, votes on an as-converted basis with the common stock, and is convertible, at the option of the holder, into such number of700,000 shares of our common stock equalto a certain officer. The incremental fair value of the unrestricted stock award was $249,000 and was recorded as part of selling, general and administrative expense on the consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income. We determined the fair value based upon the excess of the fair value of the stock award over the fair value of the cancelled award immediately prior to the numbergrant date of the new award. The unrestricted stock award vested on the grant date.

In June 2018, we completed a private placement offering of our common stock selling an aggregate of 6,336,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock to be converted, multiplied bycommon stock at a price of $0.50 per share for total gross proceeds of $3,168,000, which resulted in net proceeds of $2,661,000. We incurred costs associated with the Stated Value, divided bytransaction for accounting, legal and other fees and costs of $507,000. Such stock issuance costs have been deducted from the Conversion Price in effect at the time of the conversion. The initial Conversion Price is $1.00, subject to adjustmentproceeds received in the eventconsolidated statements of stockholders’ equity.

In October 2018, we issued 525,000 shares of common stock splits, stock dividends and similar transactions, and in the eventconjunction with a private placement of subsequent equity salessubordinated promissory notes (Note 8). The shares were valued at a lower price per share, subject to certain exceptions. The Series D Preferred Stock entitles the holder to cumulative dividends, payable quarterly, at an annual rate$263,500.

In February 2018, we issued 1,250 shares of (i) 8% of the Stated Value during the three year period commencing on the date of issue, and (ii) 12% of the Stated Value commencing three years after the date of issue. We may, at our option, pay dividends in PIK Shares, in which event the applicable dividend rate will be 12% and the number of such PIK Shares issuable will be equal to the aggregate dividend payable divided by the lesser of (x) the then effective Conversion Price or (y) the average volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the five prior consecutive trading days.

Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-upproceeds of our Company, holders of Series D Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive, for each share of Series D Preferred Stock, an amount equal$1,175 in cash related to the Stated Valueexercise of $10.00 per share plus any accrued but unpaid dividends thereon before any distribution or payment may be madestock options.

F-19

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the holders of anyConsolidated Financial Statements

Warrants

In connection with our common stock Series A Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, or subsequentlyprivate placement offering in June 2018, we issued preferred stock.

In addition, commencing on the trading day on which the closing price of the common stock is greater than $2.00 for thirty consecutive trading days with a minimum average daily trading volume of at least 5,000 shares for such period, and at any time thereafter, the Company may, in its sole discretion, effect the conversion of all of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock to common stock (subjectwarrants to the condition that, all of the shares issuable upon such conversion may be re-sold without limitation under an effective registration statement or pursuantplacement agent to Rule 144 under the Securities Act).
The Series D Preferred Stock also contains registration rights which compel the Company to file a registration statement with the SEC within 60 days of the final closing date (December 31, 2012), and requires the registration statement to become effective within 90 days thereafter. The initial registration statement was filed on February 12, 2013. If the registration statement is not declared effective by May 12, 2013, a partial liquidated damage equal to 0.1% of the purchase price paid by each investor shall be payable on each monthly anniversary until the registration statement becomes effective.  In no event shall the partial liquidated damage exceed 0.6% of the purchase price paid by each investor.
Pursuant to the Series D Certificate of Designation, commencing two years from the termination or expiration of the offering of the Series D Preferred Stock (which termination occured on December 31, 2012), and at any time thereafter, the Company in its sole discretion may redeem all of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $10.00 per share plus any accrued but unpaid dividends.
Issuance Activity
In December 2012, the Company issued 704,200 shares of Series D Preferred for cash consideration totaling $7,042,000.  In conjunction with the issuance, the Company incurred issuance costs totaling $1,374,000, consisting of placement fees of $879,000, legal and other expenses of $141,000, and 704,200 warrants to purchase633,600 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.10$ 0.50 per share providedpursuant to the placement agent with an estimatedagreement dated April 11, 2018. The fair value of $354,000 determined using the Black Scholes option valuation pricing model.warrants was $151,000. The fair value calculationof the warrants was preparedestimated using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted average assumptions: Stock price: $0.80;stock price $0.50; expected term:term 2.5 years; risk freeyears, 0% dividend rate, 77.69% of volatility; and a risk-free interest rate of interest of 0.125%; volatility of 126%; and dividend yield of $0.
On June 30, 2011,2.58%.

In October 2018, we issued warrants to the placement agent in conjunctionconnection with the Exchange Agreement described in Note 9, the Company issued 1,286,667 sharesprivate placement of Series C Preferred in exchange for the surrender and cancellation of a Senior Subordinated Secured Note in the amount of $4,000,000 and related accrued interest of $117,000.  In addition, the Company issued 128,667 shares of Series C Preferred as payment of $400,000 of accounts payable plus related accrued interest of $12,000 to its former CFO.

(b) Common Stock
For the year ended December 31, 2012
On June 4, 2012, the Company issued 325,000 shares of its common stock as consideration for acquisition related expenses in conjunction with the Apex transaction. The shares were valued at $341,000 and were recorded as part of selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2012. (Note 4)
On July 31, 2012, pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement with MacroSolve, the Company issued 617,284 shares of its common stocksubordinated notes to purchase the business of Illume Mobile, a division of MacroSolve. The shares were valued at $698,000 and were recorded as part of the purchase price. (Note 4)
On November 15, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Sigma Agreement”) with Sigma Opportunity Fund II, LLC (“Sigma Opportunity Fund”) and Sigma Capital Advisors, LLC (“Sigma Advisors”).  Pursuant to the Sigma Agreement, the Company issued to the holders of the Series C Preferred Stock an aggregate of 175,364 shares of common stock as an antidilution adjustment.
F-46

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
For the year ended December 31, 2011
On June 15, 2011, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, 2,186,869 shares of common stock were deemed issued to the Comamtech shareholders in exchange for the net assets acquired.
On June 15, 2011, pursuant to a services agreement, the Company issued 39,063 common shares with a value of $100,000 to a vendor.  The shares were recorded as a prepaid expense which is being amortized over the twelve month service period of the contract.
On June 30, 2011, pursuant to the Exchange Agreement described in Note 9, the Company issued 505,000 and 49,000 shares to the Note holder and the former CFO, respectively.  The shares were valued at $1,162,000 and $113,000, respectively, and are included in the loss on debt extinguishment in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011.
On September 30, 2011, the Company issued 116,10052,500 shares of common stock with a valuean exercise price of $267,000 in connection with the Exchange Agreement as described in Note 9.  In addition, on September 30, 2011, the Company issued 26,906 shares of common stock with a value of $58,000 to Robert Chaiken, a Director of the Company, in exchange for services rendered in connection with the negotiation of the Transfer Agreement with Empresario.
In conjunction with and as a condition of the Purchase Agreement described in Note 9, the Company issued 25,000 common shares as settlement of the $80,000 to be paid in cash as an advisory fee.  The shares were valued at $2.30$0.70 per share or $58,000, and the difference of $23,000 was recorded as an offsetpursuant to the loss on debt extinguishment in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011.
In conjunction with the Merger, as discussed in Note 1 the Company issued 153,883 shares of common stock valued at $354,000 as a finders’ fee.  On November 8, 2011, the Company and the finder entered intoplacement agent agreement pursuant to which the finder returned all of the aforementioned shares of the Company’s stock in exchange for $250,000 in cash.dated October 11, 2018. The fair value of the shares on the datewarrants was $18,000. The fair value of the agreementwarrants was $1.33estimated using the Black-Scholes model with the following weighted average assumptions: stock price $0.70; expected term 2.5 years, 0% dividend rate, 79.08% of volatility; and as such, $205,000, has been recorded as treasury stock for accounting purposes.  The remaining $45,000 has been reflected as a charge in selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying statementrisk-free interest rate of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011.
(c) Warrants
2.90%.

The following table summarizes information about the Company’sour outstanding common stock warrants as of December 31, 2012:

      Total   Weighted
      Warrants Total Average
 Date Strike Outstanding Exercise Exercise
 IssuedExpiration Price and Exercisable Price Price
           
Senior Subordinated NotesDec-09Dec-14 $3.62 138,260$500,000  
Senior Subordinated NotesDec-09Dec-14  4.34 138,260 600,000  
Placement Agent Preferred Stock - Class DDec-12Dec-17  1.10 704,200 774,620  
            
       980,720$1,874,620            1.91
            
NOTE 12 - ESOP PLAN
In December 2003,2019:

  Date  Strike  Total
Warrants
Outstanding
and
  Total
Exercise
Price
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
 
  Issued  Expiration  Price  Exercisable  (in thousands)  Price 
                   
Common Stock Investor Warrants Sep-16  Sep-21  $1.03   461,447  $475     
Placement Agent Warrants - Common Stock Jun-18  Jun-23   0.50   633,600   317     
Placement Agent Warrants - Common Stock Oct-18  Oct-23   0.70   52,500   37     
             1,147,547  $829  $0.72 

The following table summarizes our warrant activities during the Company formed an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”) and loaned the ESOP $1,950,000 (the “ESOP Note”) that the ESOP Trust (“Trust”) used to acquire 1,128,558 shares of the of the Company’s stock from its former stockholder for $1,300,000 and 564,195 shares from the Company for $650,000.  The ESOP Note bears interest at a rate of 5.25% with annual principal and interest payments and has a 15-year term.  The amount owed to the Company under the Note as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, was $767,000 and $899,000, respectively.  The ESOP Note is reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as unearned ESOP shares in stockholders’ equity.

The ESOP covers all non-union employees.  Employees are eligible to participate in the Plan after three months of service.  Plan participants start vesting after two years of participation and are fully vested after six years of participation.  ESOP contributions are determined annually by the Board of Directors, and are a minimum $130,000 per year, to repay the ESOP Note held by the Company.  The Company’s contribution expense for the year ended December 31, 2012, was $178,000 representing $131,0002019 and 2018:

  Outstanding Warrants 
  Number of
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2018  466,595  $1.99 
Granted  686,100   0.52 
Exercised      
Forfeited / Cancelled  (5,148)  88.02 
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  1,147,547   0.72 
Granted      
Exercised      
Forfeited      
Expired      
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  1,147,547  $0.72 

Note 11: Share-Based Compensation

In September 2016, we amended the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”) to re-load and permit 1,200,000 shares of our common stock available for issuance under the ESOP principal paymentplan.

Under the 2014 Plan, common stock incentives may be granted to our officers, employees, directors, consultants, and $47,000 foradvisors (and prospective directors, officers, managers, employees, consultants and advisors) and our affiliates can acquire and maintain an equity interest in us, or be paid incentive compensation, which may (but need not) be measured by reference to the ESOP interest.  The Company’s contribution expense forvalue of the year ended December 31, 2011 was $178,000 representing $125,000 for the ESOP principal payment and $54,000 for the ESOP interest.  The ESOP Note is secured by the unallocated Company stock held by the Trust.our common stock.

F-20

F-47

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2012 and 2011
ESOP shares are allocated

The 2014 Plan permits us to individual employee accounts asprovide equity-based compensation in the loan obligationform of the ESOP to the Company is reduced.  As of December 31, 2012, the ESOP held 553,420 shares of unallocated Companystock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, unrestricted stock and 1,128,303 shares of allocated Company stock.  As of December 31, 2011, the ESOP held 664,104 shares of unallocated Companyother stock bonus awards and 1,028,615 shares of allocated Company stock.  Compensation costs relating to shares released are based on the fair value of shares at the time they are committed to be released.  performance compensation awards.

The unreleased shares are not considered outstanding in the computation of earnings per common share.  Dividends received on ESOP shares are allocated based on shares held for the benefit of each participant and used to purchase additional shares of stock for each participant.  The Company has not received any dividends since the inception of the plan.  ESOP compensation expense consisting of both cash contributions and shares committed to be released for 2012 and 2011 was approximately $173,000 and $236,000, respectively.  For 2012 and 2011, the fair value of the shares was $1.15 and $2.20 per share, based on the average of the daily market closing share price.

ESOP distributions will be made in shares of Company stock, cash or a combination of Company stock and cash at the discretion of the Company. In 2012, 11,030 shares were distributed to a former employee.
ESOP shares as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
  December 31,
  2012  2011 
Allocated shares  1,017,619   917,965 
Shares committed for allocation  110,684   110,684 
Unallocated shares  553,420   664,104 
Total ESOP shares  1,681,723   1,692,753 
The fair value of the unallocated shares at December 31, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $443,000  and $498, 000, based on the closing share price of the Company’s common stock of $0.80 and $0.75, respectively.
NOTE 13 - STOCK OPTION PLAN
In December 2010, the Company established the 2010 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”).  The Plan authorizes the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company assumed all of Old DecisionPoint’s obligations under their outstanding stock option plans.
The2014 Plan is administered by the Board of Directors, or a committee appointed by the Board of Directors, which determines recipients and types of awards to be granted, including the number of shares subject to the awards, the exercise price and the vesting schedule. The term of stock options granted under the Plans2014 Plan cannot exceed ten years. Options shall not have an exercise price less than 100% of the fair market value of the Company’sour common stock on the grant date, and generally vest over a period of five years. If the individual possesses more than 10% of the combined voting power of all classes of our stock, of the Company, the exercise price shall not be less than 110% of the fair market of a share of common stock on the date of grant.
F-48

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

During the year ended December 31, 20122019 and 2011

A summary of2018, we granted 65,000 and 105,000 stock options under the status of the Plans as of December 31, 2012, and information with respect to the changes in options outstanding is as follows:
        Weighted -    
  Options     Average  Aggregate 
  Available  Options  Exercise  Intrinsic 
  for Grant  Outstanding  Price  Value 
             
January 1, 2012  298,037   701,963  $2.01    
Granted  -   -   -    
Exercised  -   -   -    
Forfeited  157,458   (157,458)  2.70    
December 31, 2012  455,495   544,505  $1.82  $- 
                 
Exercisable options at December 31, 2012      415,921  $1.72  $- 
                 
2014 Plan.

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2012:

   Options Outstanding  Options Exercisable 
      Weighted-        Weighted-    
      Average  Weighted-     Average  Weighted- 
Range of     Remaining  Average     Remaining  Average 
Exercise  Number  Contractual  Exercise  Number  Contractual  Exercise 
Prices  Outstanding  Life (Years)  Price  Exercisable  Life (Years)  Price 
                    
$1.33 - 2.03   365,620   2.33  $1.65   355,461   2.28  $1.50 
$2.06 - 4.34   178,885   8.35   2.16   60,460   8.26   1.37 
                           
Total   544,505   4.31  $1.82   415,921   3.15  $1.72 
No awards were exercised duringoption activity for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20122019 and 2011, respectively.  December 31, 2018:

  Stock
Options
  Grant Date
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
(in Years)
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
        (in years)  ($ in thousands) 
Outstanding at January 1, 2018  946,680  $1.80   2.4     
Granted  105,000   0.58         
Exercised  (1,250)  0.94         
Forfeited  (36,604)  0.94         
Outstanding at December 31, 2018  1,013,826   0.68         
Granted  65,000   0.79         
Exercised  (1,250)  0.94         
Forfeited  (300,863)  0.96         
Outstanding at December 31, 2019  776,713  $0.68   3.1  $617 
Exercisable at December 31,2019  647,882  $0.71   2.8  $512 

The total fair valueproceeds received from the exercise of awards vested for the years ended December 31, 2012stock options in 2019 and 20112018 was $76,000$1,175 and $33,000,$1,174, respectively.

F-49

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
Stock-based

Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the required service period, which is generally equal to the vesting period.  The fair value of options granted to employees during the year ended December 31, 2011, was $287,000 (no options were granted during the year ended December 31, 2012).award. The fair values wereof options presented was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

Expected term3.84 years
Expected volatility77.49%
Dividend yield0%
Risk-free interest rate1.55%
Due

  2019  2018 
Weighted average grant-date fair value per option granted $0.79  $0.31 
Expected option term  3.3 years   3.1-3.3 years 
Expected volatility factor  98.1%  77.8 - 79.4%
Risk-free interest rate  1.6%  2.7% - 2.8%
Expected annual dividend yield  %  %

We estimate expected volatility using historical volatility of common stock of our peer group over a period equal to the limited time thatexpected life of the Company’s common stock has been publicly traded, management estimates expected volatility based on the average expected volatilities of a sampling of five companies with similar attributes to the Company, including: industry, size and financial leverage.options. The expected term of the awards represents the period of time that the awards are expected to be outstanding. ManagementWe considered expectations for the future to estimate employee exercise and post-vest termination behavior. The Company doesWe do not intend to pay common stock dividends in the foreseeable future, and therefore has assumed a dividend yield of zero. The risk-free interest rate is the yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury securities for a period that is commensurate with the expected term of the awards.

As of December 31, 2019, there was $89,526 of total unrecognized share-based compensation related to unvested stock options. These costs have a weighted average remaining recognition period of 2.2 years.

F-21

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 12: Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Lease

As of December 31, 2019, we have one operating lease for office space and no financing leases. The impact of ASU No. 2016-02 on our consolidated balance sheet beginning January 1, 2019 was through the recognition of operating lease assets and lease liabilities for operating expenses.

We elected the practical expedient ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements which allows us to apply the transition provision for Topic 842 at our date of adoption. Therefore, we recognized and measured leases existing at January 1, 2019 (inception date). In addition, we elected the optional practical expedient permitted under the transition guidance which allows us to carry forward the historical accounting treatment for existing leases upon adoption. Lastly, we elected a short-term lease exception policy, permitting it to exclude the recognition requirements of this standard from leases with initial terms of 12 months or less. No impact was recorded to the statement of income and comprehensive income or beginning retained earnings for Topic 842.

Beginning January 1, 2019, operating ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of lease payments, including rent increases over the lease term at commencement date. Operating leases in effect prior to January 2019 were recognized at the present value of the remaining payments on the remaining lease term as of January 1, 2019. As the lease did not include an implicit rate of return, we used our incremental borrowing rate based on lease term information available as of the adoption date in determining the present value of lease payments.

We have an operating lease for office and warehouse space of 10,325 square feet in Irvine, California with monthly payments of $14,000 and incremental borrowing rate of 6.0%. As of December 31, 2019, we had 43 months remaining on the lease with a lease liability of $528,000.

The maturity of operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2019 are as follows (in thousands):

    
2020 $167 
2021  167 
2022  167 
2023  84 
Total minimum lease payments  585 
Less: Interest  (57)
Present value of operating lease liabilities $528 

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities (in thousands) $163 
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)  3.5 years 
Weighted average interest rate  6.0%

Employee stock-based compensation costsBenefit Plan

We have a 401(k)-retirement plan. Under the terms of the plan, eligible employees may defer up to 25% of their pre-tax earnings, subject to the Internal Revenue Service annual contribution limit. Additionally, the plan allows for discretionary matching contributions by us. In 2019 and 2018, the matching contributions were 100% of the employee’s contribution up to a maximum of 4% of the employee’s eligible compensation. During the years ended December 31, 20122019 and 2011, was $57,0002018, we contributed $108,000 and $71,000,$139,000, respectively, and is included in selling, general and administrative expense into the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  As of December 31, 2012, total unrecognized estimated employee compensation cost related401(k) plan.

F-22

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to stock options granted priorthe Consolidated Financial Statements

Contingencies

From time to that date was $140,000 which is expectedtime, we are subject to be recognized over a weighted-average vesting period of 3.42 years.

The weighted-average fair value on the grant date of options grantedlitigation incidental to employees during the year ended December 31, 2011 was $2.17.  The Company did not grant any stock options during 2012.
NOTE 14 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases - The Company leases its facilities and certain equipment under various operating leases which expire at various dates through fiscal 2018 and require us to pay a portion of the related operating expenses such as maintenance, property taxes, and insurance. Certain facilities contain renewal options for varying periods. In most cases, management expects that in the normal course of business, leases will be renewed or replaced by other leases. Certain facilities leases have free or escalating rent payment provisions. Rent expense under such leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The corporate headquarters and sales operations, including sales administration, software development, depot operation and the financial management were located in Foothill Ranch, California where the Company leased 7,500 square feet of office space which expired in July 2012. In May 2012, the Company entered into a new office lease agreement for 10,325 square feet beginning in July 2012, the lease expires in July 2017. The property is located in Irvine, California. The current monthly rental expense is approximately $12,000.
In addition, the Company has a lease for 4,100 square feet in Shelton, Connecticut for its East coast sales and operations which expires in April 2015.  The current monthly rental expense is approximately $6,100.  In September 2012, the Company notified the landlord of its early termination of the lease as of April 2013. The Company also leases 6,800 square feet in Edison, New Jersey under a lease which expires in December 2014. The current monthly rental expense is approximately $4,200.  The Company has a sales and administrative office located in Alpharetta, Georgia where it leases 5,100 square feet for general office purposes under a lease which expires in April 2015. In addition, the Company has a lease for 4,800 square feet in Alpharetta, Georgia for its technology lab center which expired in April 2012. During April, the lease was extended for an additional 3 years until April 2015, under the same terms and conditions. The current monthly rental expense for the sales and administrative office and the technology lab is approximately $12,000.
Effective upon the Closing Date of the purchase of Apex in June 2012, the Company assumed Apex’s lease of 7,800 square feet in Burlington, Ontario, Canada, which expires in March 2016. The current monthly rental expense is approximately CDN$10,000 per month.
Effective upon the Illume Mobile Closing Date, the Company assumed the Illume Mobile lease of 10,000 square feet in Tulsa, Oklahoma which expires in September 2013, with the same terms and conditions as the underlying lease. The current monthly rental expense is approximately $12,000.
The Company believes that our properties are in good condition, adequately maintained and suitable for the conduct of our business. Certain of our lease agreements provide options to extend the leaseWhen applicable, we record accruals for additional specified periods.
Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, was $549,000 and $378,000, respectively.
F-50

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012 and 2011
The aggregate remaining future minimum payments under these leases expiring after December 31, 2012, are as follows (in thousands):
Years ending December 31: Amount 
    
2013 $618 
2014  506 
2015  439 
2016  322 
2017  222 
Thereafter  76 
     
  $2,183 
     

Escrow Obligation - As part of the Apex Purchase Agreement, from the Closing Date up until the expiry of the bonus period, the Company is obligated to escrow 25% of any Equity Capital raised in excess of $500,000.  The funds in the escrow are to be used to pay the 2013 EBITDA Basic Earn-Out and the 2013 EBITDA Additional Earn-Out and the additional bonus consideration.  In December 2012, the Company raised $7,042,000 as part of the Series D Purchase Agreement.   These funds have not been placed into escrow pending agreement between the Company and the sellers of Apex regarding the financial institution that will escrow the funds, the amount of funds that are to be placed in escrow and the escrow agreement itself.
 Contingencies -  The Company is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business; the outcome of which the Company believes will not have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.  These matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s view of these matters may change in the future.
The Company is subject to the possibility of various loss contingencies including claims, suits and complaints, arising in the ordinary course of business.  The Company considers the likelihood of loss or impairment of an asset or the incurrence of a liability, as well as its ability to reasonably estimate the amount of loss, in determining loss contingencies.  An estimated loss contingency is accrued when it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has beenwill be incurred, and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company regularly evaluates current information availableWhile the outcome of lawsuits and other proceedings against us cannot be predicted with certainty, in our opinion, individually or in the aggregate, no such lawsuits are expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Note 13: Subsequent Events

On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus outbreak a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern” and on March 10, 2020, declared it to determine whether such accruals should be adjusteda pandemic. Actions taken around the world to help mitigate the spread of the coronavirus include restrictions on travel, and whether new accruals are required.

Under the Company’s bylaws, directors and officers have certain rights to indemnification by the Company against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers.  The Company maintains director and officer insurance, which covers certain liabilities arising from the obligation to indemnify directors and officers and former directorsquarantines in certain circumstances.  No material indemnification liabilities were accrued at December 31, 2012.
areas, and forced closures for certain types of public places and businesses. The Company has employment agreements with threecoronavirus and actions taken to mitigate it have had and are expected to continue to have an adverse impact on the economies and financial markets of our key executive officers as of December 31, 2012.  many countries, including geographical areas in which we operate.

The agreements do not provide for any material, out of ordinary course of business provisions or benefits.

The Company also has an employment agreement with its Chief Operating Officer. Pursuant to the Agreement, the officer is entitled to an annual bonus calculated pursuant to terms set forth in the Agreement. The agreement also contains a severance provision providing up to twelve months of salary in certain situations.
The Company also has an employment agreement with Donald Dalicandro, the Chief Executive Officer of Apex, as a resultextent of the Apex acquisition. Underimpact of COVID-19 on our operational and financial performance will depend on certain developments, including the employment agreement,duration and spread of the Company further agreed Mr. Dalicandro wouldoutbreak, impact on our customers, employees and vendors all of which are uncertain and cannot be appointedpredicted. At this point, the extent to the Company’s board of directors effective June 4, 2012, and would not be removed from the Company’s board of directors during the Earn-Out Period (as defined in the employment agreement) and the Bonus Period (as defined in the employment agreement) except by except by death, bankruptcy, incapacitywhich COVID-19 may impact our financial condition or voluntary resignation. The agreement calls for annual bonus upon achieving certain results of operation at Apex for the 12 months ending July 31, 2013, 2014,operations is uncertain.

On April 20, 2020 and 2015.  See further discussion at Note 4.

As part of the Apex Purchase Agreement, the Company is obligated to pay an additional bonus consideration to the CEO of Apex. Such bonus is considered additional contingent purchase consideration asMay 4, 2020, we are obligated to pay the bonus regardless of whether or not his employment is retained (see discussion at Note 4).
F-51

 DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2012received $740,000 and 2011
NOTE 15 - PROFIT SHARING PLAN
The Company maintains a 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (“401k Plan”).  Employees who are 21 years of age and have performed 90 days of service are eligible to participate.  Each year, employees can make salary contributions of up to 25% of their salary.  The Company matches 100% of employee contributions up to 3% of eligible employee compensation and 50% of employee contributions of 3% to 5% for a total of 4% of employee compensation.  Employer contributions to the 401k Plan$471,000, respectively, in proceeds from loans from PWBF, which were $263,000 and $259,000, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
NOTE 16 - RELATED PARTIES
The Company purchases and sells certain products and services from iTEK Services, Inc. (“iTEK”), a privately held company owned by an unrelated ESOP.  iTEK was affiliated with the Company through limited overlapping management and Board representation by the Company's Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and former Chief Financial Officer (“former CFO”).   Purchases from TEK are on similar terms that Company would have received from an unrelated third-party.
Effective upon the resignation of the Company’s former CFO during July 2012, and the concurrent discontinuance of the CEO’s iTEK Board representation, the parties have no further overlapping management and therefore are no longer considered related parties effective August 2012.
The Company had accounts payable to its former CFO, of $0 and $855,000 at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, including accrued interest.  The outstanding accounts payable balance accrues interest at 12% per annum until June 4, 2012, at which time the interest rate increased to 25%granted pursuant to the Consent and Waiver described in Note 9.  The Company incurred interest expense to related parties totaling approximately $114,000 and $275,000, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The Company has a related party receivable of $201,908 from the seller of Apex in connection with the Working Capital requirement as defined in the Purchase Agreement and described in Note 4.
Apex, a wholly owned subsidiaryPaycheck Protection Program of the Company, leases premises from an entity controlled by a shareholder. Rent expense included Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security Act.

F-23

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in the consolidated financial statements was $84,000, for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Separation Agreement - On July 23, 2012, the Company and Donald W. Rowley (“DWR”) entered into a Separation Agreement and General Release (“Separation Agreement”). Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, DWR resigned as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Director as of July 23, 2012, and as an employee of the Company on July 23, 2012. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, the Company agreed to pay DWR a total of $205,000 in equal installments in accordance with the Company’s payroll cycle beginning on August 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012. This amount was fully paid by December 31, 2012. The Separation Agreement also contains a general release from DWR.
Under the Separation Agreement, the Company also acknowledged that it owes DWR the amount of $891,000 as of July 23, 2012, which was to be paid in accordance with an Accounts Payable Payment Plan agreement, between the Company and DWR dated July 23, 2012 (“Accounts Payable Agreement”). Pursuant to the Account Payable Agreement, the Company agreed to pay interest monthly in arrears (beginning on August 1, 2012) to DWR with interest computed daily on the outstanding balance at an annual interest rate of 25%. Under the Accounts Payable Agreement, the Company was to make payments to DWR of $36,000thousands, except per month due on the first day of each month beginning May 1, 2013. The total amount due to DWR under the Accounts Payable Agreement was paid in full during the quarter ended September 30, 2012.
In December 2012, the Company sold 17,200 shares of its Series D Preferred Stock to certain related parties.  The shares were sold at the same price as additional shares sold to an independent third party. Sales of Series D Preferred Stock to certain related parties are as follows:
Shares
David RifkinDirector1,000
Lawrence YelinDirector2,200
Jay SheehyDirector1,000
Nicholas R. TomsCEO, Director10,000
Paul E. RossInterim, CFO2,000
Ralph S. HubregsenCOO1,000
17,200
F-52





Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
APEX Systems Integrators Inc.
March 31, 2012
F-53

APEX Systems Integrators Inc.
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in Canadian $)
  8-month  8-month 
  period ended  period ended 
  March 31, 2012  March 31, 2011 
  (note 1)  (note 1) 
       
Revenues      
Consulting fees $915,219  $1,026,316 
Licence and support income  606,673   648,608 
Equipment sales  976,096   448,290 
Wireless data network services income  54,632   51,563 
Travel income  8,643   47,875 
   2,561,263   2,222,652 
         
Direct costs        
Wages and benefits  243,274   231,563 
Equipment purchases for resale  706,840   247,238 
Licenses and support  233,862   180,297 
Network services expenses  27,298   26,278 
Project travel  15,650   46,875 
   1,226,924   732,251 
Gross profit  1,334,339   1,490,401 
         
Expenses        
Management salaries  689,643   733,920 
Rental of facilities  171,806   123,046 
Insurance  15,854   32,631 
Professional fees  47,654   22,275 
Office expenses  16,036   22,292 
Telephone and communications  5,222   8,709 
Amortization  8,027   7,234 
Promotion  967   9,813 
Vehicle  3,335   4,078 
Human resources  8,872   4,576 
Administrative salaries  19,320   19,931 
   986,736   988,505 
Income before other items and income taxes  347,603   501,896 
         
Other items        
Interest  597   18,455 
(Loss) gain on foreign exchange  (22,022)  11,809 
   (21,425)  30,264 
Income before income taxes  326,178   532,160 
         
Income taxes        
Current  79,667   126,000 
Deferred  6,000   - 
   85,667   126,000 
Net income $240,511  $406,160 

F-54




APEX Systems Integrators Inc.
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in Canadian $)
  8-month  8-month 
  period ended  period ended 
  March 31, 2012  March 31, 2011 
  (note 1)  (note 1) 
       
Retained earnings, beginning of period $1,602,675  $2,562,959 
         
Retained earnings, APEX Systems Integrators        
(USA) Inc. (Note 1)  (1,364,539)  - 
         
Retained earnings, APEX Systems Integrators Inc.,        
beginning of period  238,136   2,562,959 
         
Net income  240,511   406,160 
         
Dividends declared  (473,000)  - 
         
Retained earnings, end of period $5,647  $2,969,119 
F-55


APEX Systems Integrators Inc.
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in Canadian $)
  March 31,  July 31, 
  2012  2011 
       
       
Assets      
Current      
Cash and cash equivalents $573,973  $2,362,856 
Accounts receivable  178,077   239,856 
Income taxes recoverable  -   10,576 
Inventory  7,760   26,874 
Prepaid expenses  17,075   43,191 
Deposits  2,755   - 
Government remittance receivable  1,048   - 
   780,688   2,683,430 
         
Property, plant and equipment (Note 3)  28,644   34,755 
Licences and rights  -   19,250 
         
  $809,332  $2,737,435 

Liabilities
        
Current        
Accounts payable $84,404  $44,199 
Deferred revenue  580,593   392,384 
Income taxes payable  124,188   - 
Government remittances payable  -   126,382 
Dividends payable  -   552,795 
Customer deposits  -   10,000 
Deferred income taxes  14,000   8,000 
   803,185   1,133,760 
         
Shareholder’s equity        
Share capital (Note 4)  500   1,000 
Retained earnings  5,647   1,602,675 
         
   6,147   1,603,675 
         
  $809,332  $2,737,435 
On behalf of the Board
DirectorDirector
share data)

  September 30,  December 31, 
  2020  2019 
  (unaudited)    
ASSETS      
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents $3,683  $2,620 
Accounts receivable, net  8,824   8,710 
Inventory, net  940   3,825 
Deferred costs  1,840   2,201 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  296   268 
Total current assets  15,583   17,624 
Operating lease right-of-use assets  422   516 
Property and equipment, net  234   239 
Deferred costs, net of current portion  1,330   1,258 
Deferred tax assets  1,889   2,659 
Intangible assets, net  1,890   2,394 
Goodwill  6,990   6,990 
Other assets, net  13   19 
Total assets $28,351  $31,699 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $7,004  $10,589 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  1,994   2,222 
Deferred revenue  3,606   3,630 
Line of credit  -   3,177 
Current portion of debt  1,157   144 
Due to related parties  108   124 
Current portion of operating lease liabilities  150   140 
Total current liabilities  14,019   20,026 
Deferred revenue, net of current portion  2,146   1,979 
Long-term debt, net of current portion  656   390 
Noncurrent portion of operating lease liabilities  280   388 
Total liabilities  17,101   22,783 
Commitments and contingencies        
Stockholders’ equity:        
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding      
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 50,000 shares authorized; 13,576 and 13,576 shares issued and outstanding, respectively  14   14 
Additional paid-in capital  38,215   38,142 
Accumulated deficit  (26,979)  (29,240)
Total stockholders’ equity  11,250   8,916 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $28,351  $31,699 

See accompanying notes to the combined financial statements. 

F-56


APEX Systems Integrators Inc.
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in Canadian $)
  8-month  8-month 
  period ended  period ended 
  March 31, 2012  March 31, 2011 
  (note 1)  (note 1) 
       
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents      
       
Operating      
Net income $240,511  $406,160 
Amortization  8,027   7,234 
Deferred income taxes  6,000   - 
   254,538   413,394 
         
Change in non-cash working capital items        
Accounts receivable  61,856   (11,821)
Inventory  19,114   - 
Prepaid expenses  26,116   (18,000)
Deposits  (2,755)  - 
Government remittances  (127,430)  62,069 
Accounts payable  40,205   (234,522)
Deferred revenue  188,209   205,402 
Income taxes  134,764   72,708 
Customer deposits  (10,000)  (33,000)
   584,617   42,836 
         
Financing        
Dividends paid  (1,025,795)  - 
Issuance of share capital  499   - 
   (1,025,296)  - 
         
Investing        
Purchase of property, plant and equipment  (5,980)  (3,491)
Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment  3,052   - 
   (2,928)  (3,491)
         
Cash flows related to APEX Systems Integrators        
(USA) Inc. (Note 1)  (1,345,276)  - 
         
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (1,788,883)  452,739 
         
Cash        
Beginning of period  2,362,856   2,935,062 
         
End of period $573,973  $3,387,801 
See accompanying notes to the combined financial statements. 
F-57



APEX Systems Integrators Inc.
Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

F-24

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2012
1.Nature of operations
APEX

DecisionPoint Systems, Integrators Inc. (the Company) is a supplier

Consolidated Statements of wireless mobile work force solutionsIncome and is incorporated under the laws on Ontario.

The comparative financial information for the year ended July 31, 2011 and eight month period ended March 31, 2011 is presented on a combined basis with APEX Systems Integrators (USA) Inc. Effective August 1, 2011, the operations were combined and all operations were prospectively recorded Comprehensive Income

(in the Company’s records. Accordingly, these financial statements are for the eight month period ended March 31, 2012 and only include the results of APEX Systems Integrators Inc. The comparative information for the eight month period ended March 31, 2011 is neither audited nor reviewed.

2.Summary of significant accounting policies
Basis of accounting
The Company maintains its records on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting policies generally accepted in the United States.
Revenue recognition
Consulting fees, license, equipment sales, wireless data network services and travel income are recognized when services are performed and goods are delivered and the title and risks of ownership pass to the customer and the collection of the resulting receivables are reasonably assured.
Support revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the support contract.
Inventory
Inventory is valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value.  Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method.
Cash
The Company maintains cash balances at various financial institutions.
For purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the Company considers all money-market instruments to be cash equivalents as all money market deposits are cashable at amounts recorded in the balance sheet.
Accounts receivable
The Company’s accounts receivable contain no allowance for doubtful accounts, as all accounts are determined to be collectible.
For the period ended March 31, 2012 bad debt expense, net of the change in the allowance for doubtful accounts, was $ nil (2011 - $ nil).
F-58



APEX Systems Integrators Inc.
thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

  Three Months Ended
September 30
  Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
  2020  2019  2020  2019 
Net sales:            
Product $8,175  $8,585  $35,936  $22,755 
Service  2,944   3,269   9,123   8,986 
Net sales  11,119   11,854   45,059   31,741 
Cost of sales:                
Product  6,784   6,994   28,576   18,496 
Service  2,213   1,950   6,152   5,500 
Cost of sales  8,997   8,944   34,728   23,996 
Gross profit  2,122   2,910   10,331   7,745 
Operating expenses:                
Sales and marketing expense  1,021   1,297   4,001   3,675 
General and administrative expenses  1,027   894   3,232   3,041 
Total operating expenses  2,048   2,191   7,233   6,716 
Operating income  74   719   3,098   1,029 
Interest expense  61   243   232   572 
Other expense (income)  (202)  1   (212)  1 
Income before income taxes  215   475   3,078   456 
Income tax (benefit) expense  (2)  124   817   119 
Net income and comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders $217  $351  $2,261  $337 
Earnings per share attributable to stockholders:                
Basic $0.02  $0.03  $0.17  $0.03 
Diluted $0.01  $0.02  $0.14  $0.02 
Weighted average common shares outstanding                
Basic  13,576   13,576   13,576   13,363 
Diluted  15,642   15,457   15,642   15,244 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

F-25

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2012
2.Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost.  The cost of property, plant and equipment is depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the related assets.  Depreciation expense is calculated using the declining balance method.  The annual rates range from 20% to 30%. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations when incurred.  Renewals and replacements of a routine nature are charged to expense, while those that improve or extend the life of existing properties are capitalized.
Impairment of long-lived assets
Property, plant and equipment are tested for impairment upon occurrence of a triggering event that indicates the carrying value of such asset is no longer recoverable.  Examples of such triggering events include a significant disposal of a portion of such assets, an adverse change in the market involving the business employing the related asset, and a significant change in the operations of the business.
The Company has determined that there were no adverse changes in its markets or other triggering events that could affect the valuation of its assets during the fiscal periods ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011.
Fair value of financial instruments
The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short maturities of these instruments.
Foreign currency translation
The Company uses the Canadian Dollar as its functional currency and reporting currency.  Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into Canadian Dollars at the rate of exchange at the balance sheet date, while revenue and expenses are translated at the weighted average rates prevailing during the respective periods.  Components of stockholders’ equity are translated at historical rates.  Exchange gains and losses resulting from translation are reflected in the statements of income.
Income taxes
Deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect certain items of income and expense recognized in different periods for financial reporting than for tax purposes.  The principal source of temporary differences is differences in methods of depreciation.  The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740 “Income Taxes”. ASC 740 requires the determination of deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect or expected for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.  A valuation allowance is recognized, if necessary, to measure tax benefits to the extent that, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that they will be realized.
F-59


APEXDecisionPoint Systems, Integrators Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

  Common Stock  Additional
Paid-in
  Accumulated  Total
Stockholders’
 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity 
Balance at June 30, 2020  13,576  $14  $38,190  $(27,196) $11,008 
Net income           217   217 
Share-based compensation expense        25      25 
Balance at September 30, 2020  13,576  $14  $38,215  $(26,979) $11,250 

  Common Stock  Additional
Paid-in
  Accumulated  Total
Stockholders’
 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity 
Balance at June 30, 2019  13,576  $14  $38,106  $(30,145) $7,975 
Net income           351   351 
Share-based compensation expense        19      19 
Balance at September 30, 2019  13,576  $14  $38,125  $(29,794) $8,345 

  Common Stock  Additional
Paid-in
  Accumulated  Total
Stockholders’
 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity 
Balance at December 31, 2019  13,576  $14  $38,142  $(29,240) $8,916 
Net income           2,261   2,261 
Share-based compensation expense        73      73 
Balance at September 30, 2020  13,576  $14  $38,215  $(26,979) $11,250 

  Common Stock  Additional
Paid-in
  Accumulated  Total
Stockholders’
 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity 
Balance at December 31, 2018  12,875  $13  $37,817  $(30,131) $7,699 
Net income           337   337 
Common stock issued to officer  700   1         1 
Share-based compensation expense        307      307 
Exercise of stock options  1      1      1 
Balance at September 30, 2019  13,576  $14  $38,125  $(29,794) $8,345 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

F-26

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2012
3.Property, plant and equipment
        
March 31
2012
  
July 31
2011
 
     Accumulated  Net  Net 
  Cost  Amortization  Book Value  Book Value 
             
Office furniture and equipment $66,692  $55,118  $11,574  $15,478 
Tools and equipment  31,083   21,006   10,077   12,596 
Computer hardware  23,614   16,621   6,993   3,466 
Vehicle  -   -   -   3,215 
Computer software  34,097   34,097   -   - 
                 
  $155,486  $126,842  $28,644  $34,755 
4.Share capital
Authorized:
Unlimited number of Class A voting shares
Issued:
    March 31,  July 31, 
    2012  2011 
         
 500 Common shares of APEX Systems Integrators Inc. $500  $500 
            
 500 Common shares of APEX Systems Integrators (USA) Inc.  -   500 
            
     $500  $1,000 
5.Commitments
The Company has the following annual operating lease commitment with a related party as described

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in Note 7 with respect to premises:

2013
 $210,000 
2014  219,000 
2015  237,000 
2016  159,000 
  $825,000 

F-60



APEX Systems Integrators Inc.
thousands)

(Unaudited)

  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
  2020  2019 
Cash flows from operating activities      
Net income $2,261  $337 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  564   606 
Amortization of deferred financing costs and note discount  93   272 
Share-based compensation expense  73   308 
Deferred income taxes  770    
Provision for doubtful accounts  24   7 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  (137)  2,727 
Inventory, net  2,885   (77)
Deferred costs  288   (377)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (3)  (77)
Other assets, net  3   12 
Accounts payable  (3,543)  (907)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities  69   372 
Due to related parties  (17)  5 
Operating lease liabilities  (43)   
Deferred revenue  144   428 
Net cash provided by operating activities  3,431   3,636 
Cash flows from investing activities        
Purchases of property and equipment  (55)  (99)
Cash (paid to) acquired from Royce acquisition  (298)  21 
Net cash used in investing activities  (353)  (78)
Cash flows from financing activities        
Repayment of long-term debt  (146)  (1,365)
Line of credit repayments, net  (3,177)  (2,220)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net of debt issuance costs  1,308   (36)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options     1 
Net cash used in financing activities  (2,015)  (3,620)
Change in cash and cash equivalents  1,063   (889)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period  2,620   2,450 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $3,683  $1,561 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information        
Cash paid for interest $139  $310 
Cash paid for income taxes  4   54 

See Accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

F-27

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2012
6.Measurement uncertainty
The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates and assumptions by management regarding certain types of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses.  Such estimates included in the preparation of these financial statements include the assumptions used in determining the useful lives of long-lived assets and the assumptions used in determining whether assets are impaired.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.
As well, these financial statements include deferred revenue relating to consulting work that was completed and delivered, but for which a liability remained.  This amount is subject to significant uncertainty due to the level of judgment required in determining the consulting work that remains to be completed at each year end.
In addition, the Company has unrecognized tax benefits from uncertain tax positions of $170,000 (2011 - $170,000).  This amount is subject to significant uncertainty due to the likelihood of the outcome in the event of a potential Canada Revenue Agency audit.
7.Related party transactions
APEX

DecisionPoint Systems, Integrators Inc. leases premises as described in Note 5 from an entity controlled by the spouse of a shareholder.  Rent expense for the period included in the Statement of Income was $125,276 (2011 - $123,046).

This transaction has been recorded at the exchange amount, being the amount agreed upon by the parties.
8.Financial instruments
Fair value of financial instruments
The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables and accounts payables are assumed to approximate their carrying amounts because of their short term to maturity.
F-61


APEX Systems Integrators Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

March 31, 2012
8.Financial instruments (continued)
Financial risk
The financial risk

Note 1: Description of Business

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., which we sometimes refer to as the Company’s earnings arises from fluctuations in foreign exchange ratesCompany, we or us, is an enterprise mobility systems integrator that sells, installs, deploys and the degree of volatility of those rates.  The Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign exchange risk as management does not consider such risks to be material.  The Company’s exposure to foreign currency is as follows:

  
March 31,
2012
  
July 31,
2011
 
Cash and cash equivalents $205,731  $844,383 
Accounts payable  (8,368)  (9,809)
         
Gross balance sheet exposure $197,363  $834,574 
A one cent increaserepairs mobile computing and wireless systems that are used both within a company’s facilities and in the Canadian dollar againstfield. These systems generally include mobile computers, mobile application software, and related data capture equipment including bar code scanners and radio frequency identification (“RFID”) readers. We also provide professional services, consulting, staging, kitting, deployment, maintenance, proprietary and third-party software and software customization as an integral part of our customized solutions for our customers. The suite of products utilizes the U.S. dollar at March 31, 2012, would have decreased equitylatest technologies to make complex mobile technologies easy to use, understand and net income by $1,974 (2011 - $8,346).  This analysis assumes thatkeep running within all other variables remain constant (a one cent weakeningvertical markets such as; merchandising, sales and delivery; field service; logistics and transportation and warehouse management.

In June 2018, we acquired 100% of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar at March 31, 2012 or July 31, 2011, would have had the equal but opposite effect).

Credit risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrationsoutstanding stock of credit risk consist of cash equivalents and accounts receivable.  The Company has deposited cash equivalents with reputable financial institutions, from which management believes the risk of loss to be remote.  Credit risks associated with trade receivables are limited by the Company’s credit granting policies and an insurance policy which covers possible losses for certain of the Company’s customers.
9.Subsequent events
Subsequent to the 2012 period end, the Company was acquired by DecisionPointRoyce Digital Systems, Inc. The sale closed on June 4, 2012.
F-62


Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement(“RDS”), located in Irvine, California. RDS provides innovative enterprise print and mobile technologies, deployment services and on-site maintenance.

Note 2: Basis of Operations

The followingPresentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

We have prepared the accompanying unaudited pro forma combinedconsolidated financial informationstatements of DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. (“Company”) is presented to reflect the acquisition (“Acquisition”) by the Company of all the issued and outstanding shares of Apex Systems Integrators, Inc. (“Apex”).  The Acquisition was consummated on June 4, 2012.   The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012 reflect the effects of the Acquisition as if it occurred at the beginning of 2012.  The unaudited pro forma financial information is based on the historical consolidated financial statements of the Company and Apex.  The historical financial information of Apex includes the financial information of Apex Systems Integrators, Inc. and Apex Systems Integrators (USA), Inc. (“Apex USA”) as Apex purchased the operations of Apex USA in July 2011; accordingly, the combined historical information of both entities are necessary to provide a fair presentation of the historical operations that have been acquired by the Company.

Such unaudited pro forma combined financial information should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2012, including the notes thereto, which are included elsewhere in this Prospectus.  Such unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations includes unaudited historical combined financial information of Apex for the five month period ended May 31, 2012, which has been prepared by management of Apex.  The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations of the Company only includes the acquisition of Apex.  In addition, the unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations are based upon allocations of the purchase price of Apex based upon the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired in connection with the Acquisition.  Management believes that all material adjustments necessary to reflect the effect of the Acquisition have been made to the unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations.
The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations is for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations of the Company that would have occurred if the acquisition of Apex had been completed on the date indicated, nor does it purport to represent the Company’s results of operations as of any future date or for any future period.
F-63


DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Operations
  For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 
           Pro Forma  Pro Forma 
(000's except per share data) DecisionPoint  Apex  Combined  Adjustments  Combined 
                
Net sales $71,501  $1,678  $73,179  $-  $73,179 
                     
Cost of sales  55,949   1,049   56,998   -   56,998 
                     
Gross profit  15,552   629   16,181   -   16,181 
                     
Selling, general and administrative expense  18,661   409   19,070   (992)(a,c)  18,078 
                     
Operating (loss) income  (3,109)  220   (2,889)  992   (1,897)
                     
Total interest and other expense  882   34   916   291(b)  1,207 
                     
Net (loss) income before income taxes  (3,991)  186   (3,805)  701   (3,104)
                     
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (125  30   (95) 
 
-
(e)  (95)
                     
Net (loss) income  (3,866  156   (3,710)  701   (3,009)
                     
Cumulative dividends on preferred stock  (954  -   (954)  -   (954)
                     
Net loss available to common shareholders $(4,820) $156  $(4,664) $701  $(3,963)
                     
Net loss per share - basic and diluted $(0.61)             $(0.50)
                     
Weighted-average shares outstanding -                    
basic and diluted  7,900,693               7,900,693(d)

F-64


Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Operations 
Note 1 – Basis of Presentation
On June 4, 2012, (“Closing Date”), DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. ("Company” or “DPS”), 2314505 Ontario Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Purchaser”), Karen Dalicandro (“KD”), Donald Dalicandro (“DD”), and 2293046 Ontario Inc. (“KD Co” and together with KD, the “Sellers”) entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”).  Pursuant to the SPA, Purchaser purchased all of the issued and outstanding shares of Apex Systems Integrators Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada.  In consideration for the shares of Apex Systems Integrators, Inc., on the Closing Date the Purchaser paid CDN$5,000,000 (“Closing Amount”), of which CDN$240,000 (“Escrow Amount”) was placed in escrow with the Purchaser’s attorney and CDN$10,000 is held by the Purchaser as a holdback.  On the Closing Date, the Purchaser and Apex merged under the corporate name of Apex Systems Integrators Inc., and is hereafter referred to herein as “Apex”.
Closing costs and associated expenses either previously paid, payable in cash or recorded as deferred financing costs after the Closing Date total approximately $1.8 million, including the issuance of 325,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at the market price of $1.05 per share on the Closing Date.  Of this amount, approximately $190,000 was reflected as deferred financing costs and the remainder was reflected as a charge to selling, general and administrative expenses in the historical financial statements of the Company as follows: 1) First quarter ended March 31, 2012: $351,000; and 2) Second quarter ended June 30, 2012: $1,213,000.  The transaction was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 805 -   Business Combinations   and the operating results for Apex have been consolidated into the Company’s results of operations beginning on June 5, 2012.
The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations has been prepared to give effect to the acquisition by the Company of Apex using the historical consolidated financial statements of the Company and the historical combined financial statements Apex.  Please note that the unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations should be read in conjunction with the audited and unaudited historical financial statements of the Company and Apex, respectively.  This information can be found in the audited consolidated financial statement contained elsewhere in this Prospectus.
The historical financial information of Apex includes the financial information of Apex Systems Integrators, Inc. and Apex Systems Integrators (USA), Inc. (“Apex USA”) as Apex purchased the operations of Apex USA in July 2011; accordingly, the combined historical information of both entities is necessary to provide a fair presentation of the historical operations that have been acquired by the Company.
The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012, combines the unaudited results of operations of the Company and Apex to give the effect as if the Acquisition occurred the first day of the period presented (January 1, 2012). 
The unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations reflects the value of the Canadian Dollar equal to one United States Dollar (1:1) for the year ended December 31, 2012 as that value approximates the conversion rate for all dates and periods presented.  Accordingly, the historical financial information of Apex is translated from its reporting currency (Canadian Dollars) to the Company’s reporting currency (US Dollars) using $1CDN = $1US.
F-65


Note 2 - Unaudited Pro Forma Adjustments
The following are explanations that correspond by letter to the pro forma adjustments in the accompanying unaudited pro forma combined statement of operations:
(a) 
The Company has allocated the purchase price to the tangible and identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in accordance with ASC 805.  ASC 805 considers the existence of intangible assets in the following areas: marketing, customer relationships, proprietary software, artistic creations, contracts, and technology.  The Company has identified and valued software for customer sales, customer relationships, trademarks / tradenames and non-compete agreements as Apex’s principal intangible assets in accordance with ASC 805 requirements.
Amortization of customer relationships and tradenames are calculated using the discounted cash flow methodology to more properly reflect the greater useful life of the assets in the early years while the proprietary software, ApexWare, is amortized using proportional revenue approach and the covenant not to compete is amortized on a straight-line basis.  For the unaudited pro forma combined period presented, monthly amortization would have been $114,700, based upon their respective useful lives.  Total amortization reflected in the pro forma adjustment for the five month period ended May 31, 2012 was $572,000.
The estimated total amortization expenses for the five years after the closing are as follows: (000’s except where indicated)
Years ending December 31:   
2013 $1,123 
2014  987 
2015  896 
2016 and thereafter  842 
     
  $3,848 
There is no pro forma adjustment for depreciation expense since the historical depreciation is comparable.
(b) 
Term loan debt to fund the acquisition of Apex and the commensurate additional interest along with other increase in interest expense as result of transaction:
RBC Term Loan -- On June 4, 2012, Apex entered into the Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”) Credit Agreement with RBC pursuant to which RBC made available certain credit facilities in the aggregate amount of up to CDN$2.75 million, including a term facility in the amount of CDN$2.5 million.  The loan requires monthly payments of principal totaling CDN$70,000, plus interest with a final maturity date of June 2015.
BDC Term Loan --   On June 4, 2012, Apex entered into a Loan Agreement with BDC Capital Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Business Development Bank of Canada, (“BDC”), pursuant to which BDC made available to Apex a term credit facility in the aggregate amount of CDN$1.7 million. The maturity date of the loan is June 2016.
F-66

Additional interest expense is as follows: (000’s except where indicated)
RBC Term Loan -      
Principal $2,500    
Approximate rate of interest  7.0%   
Pro forma annual interest expense      175 
         
BDC Term Loan -        
Principal $1,700     
Approximate rate of interest  12.0%    
Pro forma annual interest expense      204 
         
Additional required interest payments of $20 per quarter      80 
         
SVB Line of Credit - $800     
Approximate rate of interest  7.5%    
Pro forma annual interest expense      60 
         
Amortization of deferred financing costs -$190,000/3years      64 
         
Related Party Additional Annual Interest -        
Expense reflects the increase in rate from 12% to 25% on        
$909 related party obligation      118 
         
Pro forma increase in annual interest expense.     $701 
Pro forma increase in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2012.     $291 
          (c)Pro forma add back of one-time transaction costs expensed in the historical period ended December 31, 2012 of $1,564,000.
          (d)Reflects the issuance of 325,000 shares of common stock as consideration for acquisition related expenses.  Shares were valued at $1.05 per share or $341,000.  Shares are assumed to be fully outstanding in the period presented.
          (e)The pro forma does not reflect an adjustment to income tax expense as the pro forma combined income expense would not be materially different from the historical stand alone income tax expense of the Company and Apex.
F-67





LOGO
APEX Systems Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems Integrators (USA) Inc.
July 31, 2011 and 2010
F-68


LOGO

To the Stockholders of
APEX Systems Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems Integrators (USA) Inc. 
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheets of APEX Systems Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems Integrators (USA) Inc. as of July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010, and the related combined statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the combined financial position of APEX Systems Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems Integrators (USA) Inc. as of July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010, and the combined results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
February 27, 2012/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
Hamilton, CanadaLicensed Public Accountants
Chartered Accountants
F-69




APEX Systems Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems
Integrators (USA) Inc.Combined Statements of Income 
(Amounts in Canadian $)
Years Ended July 31 2011  2010 
       
Revenue      
Consulting fees $1,457,615  $1,744,454 
License and support  946,894   877,060 
Equipment sales  498,308   802,511 
Wireless data network services  76,358   61,140 
Travel income  57,216   35,760 
   3,036,391   3,520,925 
         
Direct costs        
Wages and benefits  385,129   388,120 
Equipment purchases for resale  283,837   436,138 
Licenses and support  152,902   149,268 
Network services expenses  69,695   72,342 
Project travel  56,178   48,180 
   947,741   1,094,048 
         
Gross profit  2,088,650   2,426,877 
         
Expenses        
Management salaries  1,014,031   987,537 
Rental of facilities  184,569   185,083 
Insurance  40,631   31,041 
Professional fees  30,275   22,350 
Office expenses  24,575   24,631 
Administrative salaries  28,988   23,541 
Telephone and communications  12,014   18,011 
Amortization  10,851   13,934 
Promotion  10,173   30,233 
Vehicle  6,464   7,719 
Human resources  5,101   8,980 
   1,367,672   1,353,060 
         
Income before other income and income taxes  720,978   1,073,817 
         
Interest income  27,509   15,316 
Foreign exchange gain (loss)  27,019   (9,596)
   54,528   5,720 
         
Income before income taxes  775,506   1,079,537 
         
Income taxes (Note 7)  182,995   231,414 
         
Net income $592,511  $848,123 
See accompanying notes to the combined financial statements.
F-70


APEX Systems Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems
Integrators (USA) Inc.
(Amounts in Canadian $)
                                                     ��                                        
July 31 2011  2010 
       
Assets      
Current      
Cash and cash equivalents $2,362,856  $2,935,062 
Accounts receivable  239,933   364,337 
Income taxes recoverable (Note 7)  10,576   10,259 
Inventory  26,874   - 
Prepaid expenses  43,191   13,994 
   2,683,430   3,323,652 
         
Property, plant and equipment (Note 3)  34,755   42,450 
Licences and rights  19,250   36,250 
  $2,737,435  $3,402,352 

Liabilities      
Current      
Accounts payable $44,199  $331,722 
Government remittances payable  126,382   72,425 
Dividends payable  552,795   - 
Customer deposits  10,000   38,000 
Deferred revenue  392,384   388,246 
   1,125,760   830,393 
         
Deferred income tax liability  8,000   8,000 
         
Stockholders’ Equity        
Share capital (Note 5)  1,000   1,000 
Retained earnings  1,602,675   2,562,959 
         
   1,603,675   2,563,959 
         
  $2,737,435  $3,402,352 
Commitment (Note 9)
Subsequent events (Note 10)
On behalf of the Board
DirectorDirector
See accompanying notes to the combined financial statements.
F-71



APEX Systems Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems
Integrators (USA) Inc.
(Amounts in Canadian $)
Years Ended July 31
  Share  Retained    
  capital  earnings  Total 
          
Balance at         
  July 31, 2009 $1,000  $1,714,836  $1,715,836 
             
Net Income  -   848,123   848,123 
             
Balance at            
  July 31, 2010  1,000   2,562,959   2,563,959 
             
Net Income  -   592,511   592,511 
             
Dividends  -   (1,552,795)  (1,552,795)
             
Balance at            
  July 31, 2011 $1,000  $1,602,675  $1,603,675 
See accompanying notes to the combined financial statements.
F-72


APEX Systems Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems
Integrators (USA) Inc.
(Amounts in Canadian $)
Years Ended July 31, 2011  2010 
       
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents      
       
Operating      
Net income $592,511  $848,123 
Amortization  10,851   13,934 
   603,362   862,057 
         
Change in non-cash working capital items        
Accounts receivable  124,404   (89,137)
Inventory  (26,874)  24,832 
Prepaids  (29,197)  3,200 
Income taxes  (317)  4,188 
Accounts payable  (287,523)  73,975 
Government remittances payable  53,957   43,860 
Deposits  (28,000)  (217,875)
Deferred revenue  4,138   (55,854)
   413,950   649,246 
         
Financing        
Dividends  (1,000,000)  - 
         
Investing        
Purchase of property, plant and equipment  (3,156)  (2,514)
Proceeds on disposal of licenses and rights  17,000   - 
   13,844   (2,514)
         
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (572,206)  646,732 
         
Cash and cash equivalents        
Beginning of year  2,935,062   2,288,330 
         
End of year $2,362,856  $2,935,062 
See accompanying notes to the combined financial statements.

F-73




APEX Systems Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems
Integrators (USA) Inc.
July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010
1. Nature of operations
APEX Systems Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems Integrators (USA) Inc. are suppliers of wireless mobile work force solutions. They are incorporated under the laws on Ontario.
2. Summary of significant accounting policies
Basis of accounting
The Company maintains its recordssubsidiaries on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting policies generally accepted in the United States.
Basis of presentation
States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The combinedaccompanying consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities, equityaccounts of DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. and operatingits wholly owned subsidiaries, DecisionPoint Systems International (“DPSI”), DecisionPoint Systems Group, Inc. (“DPS Group”), and Royce Digital Systems, Inc. (“RDS”) and all intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been omitted from these interim financial statements as permitted by SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, these unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this Amendment to Form S-1 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all normal and recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial condition, results of APEXoperations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year.

The Company has been actively monitoring the novel coronavirus, or COVID-19, situation and its impact. In response to the pandemic, numerous state and local jurisdictions have imposed “shelter-in-place” orders, quarantines and other restrictions. In the United States, governmental authorities have recommended, and in certain cases required, that businesses, including those in the retail and healthcare sector, limit their operations or close. Similarly, in March 2020, the governor of California, where the Company’s headquarters are located, issued “stay at home” orders limiting non-essential activities, travel and business operations. Such orders or restrictions have resulted in reduced operations at the Company’s headquarters and at many of our customers’ facilities, work stoppages, slowdowns and delays, travel restrictions and cancellation of events.

In response to the impact of COVID-19, the Company implemented a variety of measures intended to help manage through the impact and position it to resume operations quickly and efficiently once these restrictions are lifted. Some of these measures include adapting, expanding and improving various sales and customer outreach programs to address the current environment and executing a work from home strategy for administrative functions. The impact of COVID-19 is changing daily and cannot be predicted. As a result, the Company expects the pandemic to negatively impact its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Certain accounting policies involve judgments and uncertainties to such an extent that there is a reasonable likelihood that materially different amounts could have been reported under different conditions, or if different assumptions had been used. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on a regular basis.

Revenue Recognition

We determine revenue recognition through the following steps: (1) identification of the contract with a customer; (2) identification of the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determination of the transaction price; (4) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognition of revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied.

F-28

DecisionPoint Systems, Integrators Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

We combine contracts with the same customer into a single contract for accounting purposes when the contracts are entered into at or near the same time and APEX Systems Integrators (USA) Inc., two companies controlledthe contracts are negotiated as a single commercial package, consideration in one contract depends on the other contract, or the services are considered a single performance obligation. If an arrangement involves multiple performance obligations, the items are analyzed to determine the separate units of accounting (that is, are they distinct and are they distinct in the context of the customer contract). The total contract transaction price is allocated to the identified performance obligations based upon the relative standalone selling prices of the performance obligations. The standalone selling price is based on an observable price for services sold to other comparable customers, when available, or an estimated selling price using a cost plus margin approach. We estimate the amount of total contract consideration we expect to receive for variable arrangements by determining the most likely amount we expect to earn from the arrangement based on the expected quantities of services we expect to provide, and the contractual pricing based on those quantities. We only include some or a portion of variable consideration in the transaction price when it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur or when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. We consider the sensitivity of the estimate, our relationship and experience with our client and variable services being performed, the range of possible revenue amounts and the magnitude of the variable consideration to the overall arrangement.

As discussed in more detail below, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services under the terms of a contract and is measured as the amount of consideration, we expect to receive in exchange for transferring goods or providing services. We do not have any material extended payment terms, as payment is due at or shortly after the time of the sale. Sales, value-added and other taxes collected concurrently with revenue producing activities are excluded from revenue.

We recognize contract assets or unbilled receivables related shareholders, after eliminationto revenue recognized for services completed but not yet invoiced to our clients. Unbilled receivables are recorded when we have an unconditional right to contract consideration. A contract liability is recognized as deferred revenue when we invoice clients, or receive customer cash payments, in advance of intercompany balancesperforming the related services under the terms of a contract. Remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price allocated to the performance obligations that are unsatisfied as of the end of each reporting period. Deferred revenue is recognized as revenue when we have satisfied the related performance obligation.

As of September 30, 2020, the total aggregate transaction price allocated to the unsatisfied performance obligations was approximately $5.8 million, of which approximately $3.6 million is expected to be recognized over the next 12 months.

Hardware, consumables and transactions.

Revenue recognition
Consulting fees,software products - We recognize product revenue at the point in time when a client takes control of the hardware and/or software, which typically occurs when title and risk of loss have passed to the client. Our selling terms and conditions reflect that F.O.B ‘dock’ contractual terms establish that control is transferred from us at the point in time when the product is shipped to the customer.

Revenues from software license equipment sales wireless data network services and travel income are recognized as a single performance obligation on a gross basis as we are acting as a principal in these transactions at the point the software license is delivered to the customer. Generally, software licenses are sold with accompanying third-party delivered software assurance, which allows customers to upgrade, at no additional cost, to the latest technology if new capabilities are introduced during the period that the software assurance is in effect. We determined that the accompanying third-party delivered software assurance is critical or essential to the core functionality of the software licensor because we do not sell the software license and standard warranty on a standalone basis (which indicates that the customer cannot benefit from the software license and standard warranty on its own), the software license and the standard warranty are not separately identifiable, the software license assurance warranty are inputs of a combined item in the contract, the assurance warranty and software license are highly interdependent and interrelated because the core functionality of the license is dependent on the assurance warranty, and our promise to provide the assurance warranty that is necessary for the software license to continue to provide significant benefit to the customer. As a result, the software license and the accompanying third party delivered software assurance are recognized as a single performance obligation.

We leverage drop-ship shipments with many of our partners and suppliers to deliver hardware and consumable products to our clients without having to physically hold the inventory at our warehouses, thereby increasing efficiency and reducing costs. We recognize revenue for drop-ship arrangements on a gross basis as the principal in the transaction when the product is received by the client because we control the product prior to transfer to the client. We also assume primary responsibility for the fulfillment in the arrangement, we assume inventory risk if the product is returned by the client, we set the price of the product charged to the client, we assume credit risk for nonpayment by our customer, and we work closely with clients to determine their hardware specifications.

Professional services - We provide professional services which include consulting, staging, deployment, installation, repair and customer specified software customization. The arrangement is based on either a time and material basis or a fixed fee. For our time and materials service contracts, we recognize revenues as those services are provided and consumed, as this is the best output measure of how the services are transferred to the customer. Fixed fee contracts are recognized in the period in which the services are performed and goodsor delivered using a proportional performance service model. Revenue is recognized on a gross basis in the period in which the services are delivered and the title and risks of ownership passperformed or delivered.

F-29

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the customerConsolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Maintenance services - We sell certain Original Equipment Manufacturer (“OEM”) hardware and software maintenance support arrangements to our clients. We also offer an internal maintenance agreement related to hardware. These contracts are support service agreements for the collectionhardware and/or software products that were acquired from us and others. Although these are third-party support agreements for maintenance on the specific hardware and/or software products, our internal help desk and systems engineers assist customers by providing technical assistance on the source of or how to fix the problem. In addition, we also provide a turn back feature, deploying replacements as needed while we manage the return and reverse logistics of the resulting receivables are reasonably assured.

Support revenueproduct back to the OEM. Revenue related to service contracts is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement, generally over one to three years.

We act as the principal in the transaction as the primary obligor for fulfillment in the arrangement, we set the price of the service charged to the customer, and we assume credit risk for the amounts invoiced. In addition, we manage back-end warranties, service contracts and repairs for multiple products and suppliers. We leverage our knowledge base of mobility best practices by consolidating multiple suppliers’ supplier’s maintenance requirements under a single point in contact through us. Our internal support contract.

Inventories
Inventoriesteam assists our customers first by performing an initial technical triage to determine the source of the problem including, but not limited to, physical damage and software issues and whether they can be handled remotely by the client or returned for repair. Further, we receive the returned products, confirm that the equipment is operational or not, either repair or refurbish the equipment internally or return it to the manufacturer directly to repair. We then obtain the product turn back from the manufacturer and either send it back out to a specific customer location or place in a customer’s spare pool. As a result, we recognize the revenue on a gross basis.

We defer costs to acquire contracts, including commissions, incentives and payroll taxes if they are statedincremental and recoverable costs of obtaining a customer contract with a term exceeding one year. Deferred contract costs are amortized to sales and marketing expense over the contract term, generally over one to three years. We have elected to recognize the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a term of less than one year as a selling expense when incurred. We include deferred contract acquisition costs in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” in the consolidated balance sheets. As of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we had $124,951 and $109,309, respectively, related to net deferred contract acquisition costs. We recorded $15,642 and $10,423 in amortized deferred contract acquisition costs in the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, respectively.

The following table summarizes net sales by revenue source (in thousands):

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
  Nine Months Ended
 September 30,
 
  2020  2019  2020  2019 
             
Hardware and software $7,516  $7,361  $33,565  $18,992 
Consumables  659   1,224   2,371   3,763 
Professional services  2,944   3,269   9,123   8,986 
  $11,119  $11,854  $45,059  $31,741 

Accounting Standards Adopted

We adopted ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), – Disclosure Framework – Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which makes a number of changes meant to add, modify or remove certain disclosure requirements associated with the movement amongst or hierarchy associated with Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

We adopted ASU No. 2018-15, Intangibles–Goodwill and Other–Internal-Use Software that requires implementation costs incurred by customers in cloud computing arrangements to be deferred and recognized over the term of the arrangement, if those costs would be capitalized by the customer in a software licensing arrangement under the internal-use software guidance in ASC Topic 350, Intangibles–Goodwill and Other. This ASU requires a customer to disclose the nature of its hosting arrangements that are service contracts and provide disclosures as if the deferred implementation costs were a separate, major depreciable asset class. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This ASU will require the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets, including trade receivables, held at the lower of costreporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and net realizable value using the first-in, first-out method of accounting.

Cashreasonable and cash equivalents
supportable forecasts. The Company maintains cash balances at various financial institutions.
For purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the Company considers all money-market instruments to be cash equivalents as all money market deposits are cashable at amounts recordedguidance was initially effective for us in the balance sheet.first quarter of 2020. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-10, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates,” which, among other things, defers the effective date of ASU 2016-13 for public filers that are considered smaller reporting companies, as defined by the SEC, to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted. Although management continues to analyze the provisions of this ASU, currently, we believe the adoption of this ASU will not significantly impact the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial position.

F-30

Accounts receivable
The Company’s accounts receivable contain no allowance for doubtful accounts, as all accounts are determined to be collectible.
For the year ended July 31, 2011 bad debt expense net of the change in the allowance for doubtful accounts was $ nil (2010 - $ nil).
F-74


APEX

DecisionPoint Systems, Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems

Integrators (USA) Inc.

Notes to the CombinedConsolidated Financial Statements

July 31, 2011

(Unaudited)

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes,” to simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and July 31, 2010

2. 
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Property, plantclarifies and equipment
Property, plantamends existing guidance to improve consistent application. ASU 2019-12 is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of 2022. We do not expect this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Note 3: Intangible Assets

Definite lived intangible assets are as follows (in thousands):

  September 30, 2020  December 31, 2019 
  Gross
Amount
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net
Amount
  Gross
Amount
  Accumulated
Amortization
  Net
Amount
 
Customer lists and relationships $3,270  $(1,494) $1,776  $3,270  $(1,104) $2,166 
Trade name  490   (376)  114   490   (262)  228 
  $3,760  $(1,870) $1,890  $3,760  $(1,366) $2,394 

Amortization expense recognized during the three and equipment are stated at cost.  The cost of property, plantnine months ended September 30, 2020 was $169,000 and equipment is depreciated over$505,000, respectively. Amortization expense recognized during the estimated useful lives of the related assets.  Depreciationthree and nine months ended September 30, 2019 was $183,000 and $366,000, respectively. Amortization expense is calculated usingon an accelerated basis.

Note 4: Net Income Per Share

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing the decliningnet income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income per share is calculated similarly to basic per share amounts, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive.

Below is a reconciliation of the fully dilutive securities effect for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands, except per share data):

  Three Months Ended
September 30,
  Nine Months Ended  
September 30,
 
  2020  2019  2020  2019 
Net income attributable to common stockholders $217  $351  $2,261  $337 
                 
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding  13,576   13,576   13,576   13,363 
Dilutive effect of stock options, warrants and restricted stock  2,066   1,881   2,066   1,881 
Weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share  15,642   15,457   15,642   15,244 
                 
Basic income per share $0.02  $0.03  $0.17  $0.03 
Diluted income per share $0.01  $0.02  $0.14  $0.02 

F-31

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 5: Debt

The following table sets forth our outstanding debt (in thousands):

    September 30,  December 31, 
  Maturity Date 2020  2019 
Subordinated promissory notes April 30, 2021 $500  $500 
PWBF promissory note August 25, 2020     144 
PWBF PPP loan May 4, 2022  471    
PWBF PPP loan April 20, 2022  740    
EIDL Note August 27, 2051  150    
Line of credit September 12, 2023     3,177 
Unamortized discount    (48)  (110)
Less:  Current portion of debt    (1,157)  (3,321)
Total long-term debt   $656  $390 

Subordinated Promissory Notes

In October 2018, we completed a private placement of subordinated promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1,500,000. These promissory notes carry an interest rate of 12% per annum, are not collateralized, and require quarterly interest payments with a maturity date of April 30, 2021. In connection with these promissory notes, we issued warrants to the placement agent to purchase 52,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.70 per share. The fair value of the warrants was $18,000. In addition, we issued 525,000 shares of our common stock to note holders. The estimated fair value of these shares was $262,500 and such amount has been presented as a debt discount and is being amortized to interest expense through the maturity date of the promissory notes. As of September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the outstanding principal balance method.of these promissory notes was $500,000.

PWBF Promissory Note

In June 2018, we entered into a promissory note with Pacific Western Business Finance (“PWBF”) with a principal amount of $750,000. This promissory note carried an annual interest rate of prime rate plus 1.25% (4.50% at July 31, 2020 and 6.00% at December 31, 2019, respectively) with a maturity date of August 25, 2020. Principal payments are due and payable in 26 consecutive payments each in the amount of $20,834 beginning June 25, 2018. In July 2020, the promissory note was paid in full.

PWBF PPP Loans

On April 20, 2020 and May 4, 2020, we received $740,000 and $471,000, respectively, in proceeds from loans from PWBF, which were granted pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program of the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security Act (“PPP Loans”). Under the terms of the PPP Loans, interest accrues on the outstanding principal at the rate of 1.0% per annum with a deferral of payments for nine months with a term of two years. Principal payments are due and payable in 18 consecutive payments beginning on November 1, 2020 in the amount of $41,437 for the PPP loan received on April 20, 2020 and $26,374 beginning on December 1, 2020 for the PPP loan received on May 4, 2020. The annual rates rangePPP Loans may be prepaid in part or in full, at any time, without penalty. The CARES Act provides for forgiveness of up to the full amount borrowed, subject to certain conditions, and based on the use of proceeds for qualifying expenses including payroll, benefits, rent and utilities. We used the entire PPP loan proceeds for qualifying expenses. In December 2020, we applied for loan forgiveness, including principal and accrued interest as permitted by the CARES Act. Principal and interest payments due under the PPP Loans are deferred until the review and approval of any forgiveness is made by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”). Any portion of the PPP Loans that are forgiven will be recorded as a gain on extinguishment of debt in the period forgiveness is made by the SBA. While we believe that our use of the loan proceeds will meet the conditions for forgiveness of the loans, we cannot provide assurance that we will obtain forgiveness of the PPP Loans, in whole, or in part.

EIDL Note

On August 27, 2020, we received $150,000 in connection with a promissory note from 20%the U.S. Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) under the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) program pursuant to 30%. Maintenancethe CARES Act. Under the terms of the EIDL promissory note, interest accrues on the outstanding principal at an interest rate of 3.75% per annum with a term of 30 years with equal monthly payments of principal and repairs are chargedinterest of $731 beginning on August 27, 2021.  

Line of Credit

Our amended and restated credit agreement with PWBF, formerly known as CapitalSource Business Financial Group, provides for a $7.25 million line of credit with a current maturity date of September 2023. The line of credit bears interest at the prime rate plus 1.25% (4.75% and 6.00% at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively) and is secured by substantially all of our U.S. assets.

F-32

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to operations when incurred.  Renewalsthe Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

As of September 30, 2020, availability under the line of credit was approximately $5.1 million, which is determined from a borrowing base calculation on our existing accounts receivable balance. As of September 30, 2020, we had no outstanding borrowings under the line of credit, and replacementsas of December 31, 2019, we had $3.2 million outstanding under the line of credit.

We were required to maintain a financial covenant in accordance with the line of credit. The financial covenant requires a Fixed Charge Ratio not less than 1.2 to 1.0 as of each month-end, determined on a trailing 12-month basis, with “Fixed Charge Ratio” defined as (a) EBITDA (net income before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization) less cash paid for income taxes, owner distributions, earnout payments and all unfinanced capital expenditures, divided by (b) the aggregate of principal and interest payments, and all other fees, costs and expenses paid or payable to PWBF related to the promissory note. As of December 31, 2019 and each subsequent month, we were in compliance with the financial covenant.

On August 4, 2020, we entered into an amended and restated credit agreement with PWBF to remove the Fixed Charge Ratio financial covenant and extend the maturity date of the line of credit from August 2020 to September 2020.

On September 3, 2020, we entered into an amended and restated credit agreement with PWBF to further extend the maturity date to September 12, 2023 and increased the line of credit from $7.25 million to $10.0 million.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, interest expense on debt, including amortization of deferred financing costs, was approximately $61,000 and $232,000, respectively.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, interest expense on debt, including amortization of deferred financing costs, was approximately $243,000 and $572,000, respectively.

Note 6: Warrants

The following table summarizes information about our outstanding common stock warrants as of September 30, 2020:

  Date 

Exercise

  Total
Warrants
Outstanding
and
  Total
Exercise
Price
  Weighted
Average
Exercise
 
  Issued Expiration Price  Exercisable  (in thousands)  Price 
                 
Common Stock Investor Warrants Sep-16 Sep-21 $1.03   461,447  $475     
Placement Agent Warrants - Common Stock Jun-18 Jun-23  0.50   633,600   317     
Placement Agent Warrants - Common Stock Oct-18 Oct-23  0.70   52,500   37     
           1,147,547  $829  $0.72 

There were no warrants granted, exercised, forfeited or expired during the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

Note 7: Share-Based Compensation

The amended 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”) authorizes up to 2,200,000 shares of our common stock available for issuance under the plan.

Under the 2014 Plan, common stock incentives may be granted to our officers, employees, directors, consultants, and advisors (and prospective directors, officers, managers, employees, consultants and advisors) and our affiliates can acquire and maintain an equity interest in us, or be paid incentive compensation, which may (but need not) be measured by reference to the value of the our common stock.

The 2014 Plan permits us to provide equity-based compensation in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, unrestricted stock and other stock bonus awards and performance compensation awards.

The 2014 Plan is administered by the Board of Directors, or a committee appointed by the Board of Directors, which determines recipients and the number of shares subject to the awards, the exercise price and the vesting schedule. The term of stock options granted under the 2014 Plan cannot exceed ten years. Options shall not have an exercise price less than 100% of the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date, and generally vest over a period of five years. If the individual possesses more than 10% of the combined voting power of all classes of our stock, the exercise price shall not be less than 110% of the fair market of a routine nature are chargedshare of common stock on the date of grant.

F-33

DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.

Notes to expense, while those that improve or extend the life of existing properties are capitalized.

Licenses and rights
Intangible assets consist of licenses and rights. Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The intangibles are not amortized as they have an infinite life.

Impairment of property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are testedfollowing table summarizes stock option activity for impairment upon occurrence of a triggering event that indicates the carrying value of such assetnine months ended September 30, 2020:

  Stock
Options
  Grant Date
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
       
Outstanding at January 1, 2020  776,713  $0.68 
Granted  140,000   0.79 
Forfeited or expired  (13,750) $0.94 
Outstanding at September 30, 2020  902,963  $0.70 
Exercisable at September 30, 2020  754,505  $0.95 

Share-based compensation cost is no longer recoverable. Examples of such triggering events include a significant disposal of a portion of such assets, an adverse change inmeasured at the market involving the business employing the related asset, and a significant change in the operations of the business.

The Company has determined that there were no adverse changes in our markets or other triggering events that could affect the valuation of its assets during the fiscal years ended July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010.
Impairment of licenses and rights
The Company annually reviews the carrying value of licenses and rights to determine whether impairment may exist. Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350 “   Intangibles-Goodwill and Other   ” requires that certain intangible assets be assessed annually for impairment using fair value measurement techniques.
As of July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010, it was determined thatgrant date based on the fair value of the licenses and rights exceeded their carrying amounts and the second step of the impairment testing was therefore not necessary.
Fair value of financial instruments
The carrying amounts of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short maturities of these instruments.
Foreign currency translation
The Company uses the Canadian Dollar as its functional currency and reporting currency. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into Canadian Dollars at the rate of exchange at the balance sheet date, while revenue and expenses are translated at the weighted average rates prevailing during the respective periods.  Components of stockholders’ equity are translated at historical rates.  Exchange gains and losses resulting from translation are reflected in the statements of income.
F-75


APEX Systems Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems
Integrators (USA) Inc.
Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010
2. 
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Income taxes
Deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect certain items of income and expense recognized in different periods for financial reporting than for tax purposes.  The principal source of temporary differences is differences in methods of depreciation.       The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740   “Income Taxes”.     ASC 740 requires the determination of deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect or expected for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is recognized, if necessary, to measure tax benefits to the extent that, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that they will be realized.
3. Property, plant and equipment 
        2011 
     Accumulated  Net 
  Cost   Amortization  Book Value 
          
Office furniture and equipment $68,096  $52,618  $15,478 
Tools and equipment  31,083   18,487   12,596 
Computer hardware  17,634   14,168   3,466 
Vehicle  22,502   19,287   3,215 
             
  $139,315  $104,560  $34,755 
             
           2010 
      Accumulated  Net 
  Cost  Amortization  Book Value 
             
Office furniture and equipment $68,096  $48,748  $19,348 
Tools and equipment  31,083   15,338   15,745 
Computer hardware  14,477   11,712   2,765 
Vehicle  22,502   17,910   4,592 
             
  $136,158  $93,708  $42,450 

F-76



APEX Systems Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems
Integrators (USA) Inc.
Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010
4. Related party transactions
APEX Systems Integrators Inc. leases premises as described in Note 9 from an entity controlled by the spouse of a shareholder. Rent expense for the year included in the Combined Statement of Income was $185,000 (2010 - $185,000).
In addition, during the July 31, 2011 year end, a licence was sold to a stockholder for $17,000. At July 31, 2011, this amount remains unpaid and is included in accounts receivable.
These transactions have been recorded at the exchange amount, being the amounts agreed upon by the parties.
At July 31, 2011, APEX Systems Integrators Inc. purchased the support contracts entered into by APEX Systems Integrators USA Inc. and assumed the liability to carry-out these contracts. These contracts were transferred at the value of the related deferred revenue.
5. Stockholders’ equity
Authorized:
The Company is authorized to issue an unlimited number of common shares and unlimited special shares.  The preference shares are issuable in series with rights and conditions to be determined by directors other than as follows:
(a)  8%, double-voting, non-cumulative Series A Special Shares.
Issued: 2011  2010 
       
500     Common shares of APEX Systems      
Integrators Inc. $500  $500 
500   Common shares of APEX Systems        
Integrators (USA) Inc.  500   500 
  $1,000  $1,000 
6. Measurement uncertainty
The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates and assumptions by management regarding certain types of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses.  Such estimates included in the preparation of these financial statements include the assumptions used in determining the useful lives of long-lived assets and the assumptions used in determining whether assets are impaired. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
F-77



APEX Systems Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems
Integrators (USA) Inc.
Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010
6.
Measurement uncertainty (Continued)
As well, these financial statements include deferred revenue relating to consulting work that was completed and delivered, but for which a liability remained. This amount is subject to significant uncertainty due to the level of judgment required in determining the consulting work that remains to be completed at each year end.
In addition, the Company has unrecognized tax benefits from uncertain tax positions of $170,000 (2010 - $115,000). This amount is subject to significant uncertainty due to the likelihood of the outcome in the event of a potential Canada Revenue Agency audit.
7.Income taxes                                                                                                             
  2011  2010 
Income before income taxes $775,506  $1,079,537 
         
Differences between financial statement income and        
taxable income        
Capital cost allowance in excess of amortization  (4,000)  (5,000)
Scientific research and development claims, net  21,000   (40,000)
Other  11,494   15,463 
         
Taxable income $804,000  $1,050,000 
         
Expected tax at statutory rates of 15.5% (2010 – 16.5%) $124,000  $170,000 
Unrecognized tax benefits from uncertain tax positions  55,000   74,000 
Other  3,995   (12,586)
         
Provision for income taxes $182,995  $231,414 
         
Current income tax liability $(155,959) $(174,741)
Scientific research and experimental development        
tax credit  166,535   185,000 
         
Income taxes recoverable $10,576  $10,259 
         
Deferred income tax liability $8,000  $8,000 
The deferred tax liability consists of differences between the book value and the tax value of specific assets.
The Company has unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $170,000 as at July 31, 2011 (2010 - $115,000) associated with tax positions taken in the current and prior year, all of which, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. The Company did not incur any income tax related interest expense or penalties related to uncertain tax positions during the years ended July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010.
F-78



APEX Systems Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems
Integrators (USA) Inc.
Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010
8. Financial instruments
Fair value of financial instruments
award. The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivables and accounts payablesoptions for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 were estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

  Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2020
 
Weighted average grant-date fair value per option granted $0.79 
Expected option term  3.3 years 
Expected volatility factor  90.5%
Risk-free interest rate  1.5%
Expected annual dividend yield  %

As of September 30, 2020, there was $66,000 of total unrecognized share-based compensation related to unvested stock options. These costs have a weighted average remaining recognition period of 2.0 years.

Note 8: Contingencies

Litigation

From time to time, we are assumedsubject to approximate their carrying amounts because of their short term to maturity.

Financial risk 
The financial risklitigation incidental to the Company’s earnings arises from fluctuations in foreign exchange ratesconduct of our business. When applicable, we record accruals for contingencies when it is probable that a liability will be incurred, and the degreeamount of volatilityloss can be reasonably estimated. While the outcome of those rates.  The Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign exchange risk as management does not consider such risks tolawsuits and other proceedings against us cannot be material.
The Company’s exposure to foreign currency is as follows:
(in U.S. dollars) 2011  2010 
       
Cash and cash equivalents $844,383  $312,064 
Accounts payable  (9,809)  (78,628)
Gross balance sheet exposure $834,574  $233,436 
A one cent increasepredicted with certainty, in our opinion, individually or in the Canadian dollar againstaggregate, no such lawsuits are expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Concentrations

During the U.S. dollarnine months ended September 30, 2020, Nordstrom and Kaiser Permanente accounted for approximately 37%, or $16.6 million, and 15%, or $6.8 million, of our net sales, respectively. No other single customer during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 accounted for more than 10% of net sales. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, Kaiser Permanente accounted for approximately 18%, or $5.8 million of our net sales. No other single customer during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 accounted for more than 10% of net sales.

Trade accounts receivable from Nordstrom and Kaiser Permanente represented approximately 21% and 58% of net consolidated receivables at JulySeptember 30, 2020 and December 31, 2011, would2019, respectively. While we believe our relationships with such customers are stable, most arrangements are made by purchase order and are terminable at will by either party. A significant decrease or interruption in business from our significant customers could have decreased equitya material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and net income by $8,346 (2010 - $2,334). This analysis assumes that all other variables remain constant (a one cent weakeningresults of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar at July 31, 2011 or July 31, 2010, would have had the equal but opposite effect).

Credit risk 
operations. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Companyexpose us to concentrationsa concentration of credit risk principally consist of cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company has deposited cash equivalents with reputableWe sell products to a large number of customers in many different geographic regions. To minimize credit risk, we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial institutions, from which management believes the risk of loss to be remote.  Credit risks associated with trade receivables are limited by the Company’s credit granting policies and an insurance policy which covers possible losses for certain of the Company’s customers.condition.

F-34

F-79


APEX

DecisionPoint Systems, Integrators Inc. and APEX Systems

Integrators (USA) Inc.

Notes to the CombinedConsolidated Financial Statements

July 31, 2011

(Unaudited)

Note 9: Acquisitions

Royce Digital Systems

In connection with the acquisition of Royce Digital Systems, Inc. (“RDS”) in June 2018, we estimated an earnout obligation of $500,000 for the second 12-month period post acquisition. Since the closing of the acquisition, certain disputes have arisen of third-party claims seeking potential damages potentially to be incurred by us. On September 16, 2020, in settlement of the dispute, the Company and July 31, 2010

9. Commitment
The Company has the following annual operating lease commitment with a related party as described in Note 4 with respect to premises:
2012 $192,000 
2013  210,000 
2014  219,000 
2015  237,000 
2016  159,000 
10. Subsequent events
Subsequentseller agreed to the 2011 year end,original earnout obligation of $500,000 and that only $298,000 of the stockholder groupearnout shall be paid by the Company in settlement of the disputes. As a result, we recorded $202,000 in Other Income in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020.

ExtenData Solutions, LLC Acquisition

On December 4, 2020, the Company entered into discussions with a U.S. corporationMembership Unit Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) and concurrently therewith closed upon the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding membership interests of ExtenData Solutions, LLC (“ExtenData”). As a result of the acquisition ExtenData became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. ExtenData is focused on enterprise mobility solutions and that provides software product development, mobile computing, identification and tracking solutions, and wireless tracking solutions. 

The purchase price for the purchaseacquisition was $4,250,000, subject to certain adjustments such as potential deductions for indebtedness and other transaction related expenses and bonuses. In addition, subject to the financial performance of ExtenData in each of the sharestwo years following closing, the Company may pay the sellers a total of APEX Systems Integrators Inc.up to an additional $750,000 in earn out payments. Of the purchase price, $500,000 was delivered into escrow at the closing to, among other things, cover any losses for which the sellers may be obligated to indemnify the Company. The sale is expectedPurchase Agreement imposes additional obligations on the parties, including restrictive covenants that are applicable to closethe sellers.

Given the proximity of the acquisition closing date and the filing of this registration statement, we have not yet completed our analysis of the estimated fair value of the acquisition purchase price (including earn-outs) and the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the first quarteracquisition. We expect that significant goodwill and definite-lived intangible assets will be recognized upon completion of calendar 2012.the required purchase price allocation analysis.

F-35

Shares

 

DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.

Common Stock

Prospectus

, 2021



PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS


ITEM

Item 13. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION.

Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution

The following table sets forth the estimated costs and expenses, to be incurredother than underwriting discounts and commissions, (if any), payable in connection with the issuance and distributionregistration of the securities registered under this Registration Statement.common stock hereunder. All amounts shown are estimates except for the SecuritiesSEC registration fee,

  Amount to Be
Paid
 
SEC registration fee $2,780 
Accountants’ fees and expenses  20,000 
Transfer and registrar fees and expenses  1,000 
Printing and engraving expenses  4,000 
Legal fees and expenses  35,000 
Consulting expenses  30,000 
Total $92,780 

Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Exchange Commission registration fee.

SEC registration fee  
 $383  
Legal fees and expenses   $50,000 
Accounting fees and expenses   $20,000 
Miscellaneous expenses $10,000 
Total $80,383  
ITEM 14. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS.
 Section 145Officers

Article Sixth of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, no director or officer shall be personally liable to the corporation or its shareholders for damages for breach of any duty owed to the corporation or its shareholders. Article Sixth of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation also provides that, to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law we will indemnify our officers and directors from and against any and all expenses, liabilities, or the Delaware Law, provides that a corporation may indemnifyother matters.

Article VI of our Amended and Restated Bylaws further addresses indemnification of our directors and officers as well as other employees and individuals against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement in connection with specified actions, suits or proceedings, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by orallows us to indemnify our directors in the rightevent they meet certain criteria in terms of the corporation — a “derivative action”), if they actedacting in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believedan official capacity within the scope of their duties, when such conduct leads them to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe their conduct was unlawful. A similar standard is applicable in the case of derivative actions, except that indemnification only extends to expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred in connection with defense or settlement of such action, and the statute requires court approval before there can be any indemnification where the person seeking indemnification has been found liable to the corporation. Under Section 145 of the Delaware Law, a corporation shall indemnify an agent of the corporation for expenses actually and reasonably incurred if and to the extent such person was successful on the meritsinvolved in a proceeding or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein.

Section 145 of the Delaware Law authorizes a court to award, or a corporation’s board of directors to grant, indemnity to directors and officers in terms sufficiently broad to permit such indemnification under certain circumstances for liabilities (including reimbursement for expenses incurred) arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide for indemnification of our directors, officers, employees and other agents to the maximum extent permitted by the Delaware Law. legal action.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) may be permitted to our directors, officers orand controlling persons controlling our companyof the small business issuer pursuant to suchthe foregoing provisions, we haveor otherwise, the small business issuer has been informedadvised that in the opinion of the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

The following lists set forth information regarding all securities sold or granted by us within the past three years that were not registered under the Securities Act, and the consideration, if any, received by us for such securities:

(1)Between April and June 2018, we sold to accredited investors an aggregate of 6,336,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.50 per share for total gross proceeds of $3,168,000.

(2)In October 2018, we issued and sold to accredited investors subordinated promissory notes having a total principal balance of $1,500,000 together with a total of 525,000 shares of common stock.

(3)In March 2019, we granted an executive officer a restricted stock award of 700,000 shares in connection with the negotiation of an employment agreement. Except for restrictions imposed by law the shares are unrestricted.

II-1

ITEM 15. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES.

As of August 15, 2013, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with accredited investors (the “Investors”) for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,756,400. Closings were held as of August 15, 2013 and August 21, 2013. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company sold an aggregate of 2,927,333 Units, each Unit consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase one-half of one share of common stock (the “Investor Warrants”), for a purchase price of $0.60 per Unit, such that the Company sold an aggregate of 2,927,333 shares of common stock (the “Common Shares”) and 1,463,667 Investor Warrants for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,756,400 (the “Private Placement”). The Investor Warrants have a five-year term and an exercise price of $1.00 per share

The Company retained Newport Coast Securities, Inc. (the “Placement Agent”) as the placement agent for the Private Placement. The Company paid the Placement Agent $175,640 in commissions (equal to 10%

Each of the gross proceeds), and issuedforegoing issuances was made in a transaction not involving a public offering pursuant to an exemption from the Placement Agent and its designees five-year warrants (the “Placement Agent Warrants”) to purchase 292,733 shares of common stock (equal to 10%registration requirements of the number of Units soldSecurities Act in the Private Placement) at an exercise price of $0.60 per share, exercisable on a cashless basis, in connection with the Private Placement.


On December 20, 2012, we entered into and closed a securities purchase agreement (the “Series D Purchase Agreement”) with accredited investors (the “Investors”), pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 633,600 shares of Series D Preferred Stock (the “Series D Preferred Shares”) for a purchase price of $10.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $6,336,000 (the “Series D First Closing”).  On December 31, 2012, we sold an additional 70,600 shares of Series D Preferred Stock (the “Series D Second Closing”) pursuant to the Series D Purchase Agreement for an aggregate of 704,200 shares of Series D Preferred Stock sold.  The Placement Agent acted as the placement agent for the Series D Second Closing as well. We paid the Placement Agent $56,480 in commissions (equal to 8% of the gross proceeds), and issued to the Placement Agent Placement Agent Warrants to purchase 70,600 shares of common stock (equal to 10% of the number of shares of common stock underlying the Series D Preferred Shares sold under the Purchase Agreement) at an exercise price of $1.10 per share, in connection with the Series D Second Closing for an aggregate of 704,200 such warrants.

On November 15, 2012, issued to the holders of the Series C Preferred Stock an aggregate of 175,364 shares of common stock as an antidilution adjustment.
On July 31, 2012, the Company issued 617,284 shares of common stock to MacroSolve, Inc. as part of the consideration for the acquisition of assets.
On June 15, 2011, the Company entered into a Plan of Arrangement (the “Plan of Arrangement”) and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) among the Company, 2259736 Ontario Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Comamtech which was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario, Canada (the “Purchaser”) and DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Old DecisionPoint”).  Pursuant to the Merger Agreement and Plan of Arrangement under Section 182 of the Ontario Business Corporation Act, on June 15, 2011 (the “Effective Date”), Old DecisionPoint merged (the “Merger”) into the Purchaser becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.  In connection with the Merger, the Company changed its name to DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. and the Purchaser changed its name to DecisionPoint Systems International, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “DecisionPoint Systems International”). Pursuant to the Plan of Arrangement and Merger Agreement, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Old DecisionPoint from its shareholders in exchange for 4,593,660 shares of the Company’s common stock, resulting in an exchange ratio of one share for every eight shares of common stock tendered (1:8). The Company also acquired all of Old DecisionPoint’s issued and outstanding Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares and Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares in exchange for 243,750 and 118,750 of the Company’s Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares, respectively. In connection therewith, the Company issued to Sigma Opportunity Fund II, LLC 105,700 shares of common stock as an antidilution adjustment. 
In connection with the foregoing, the Company reliedreliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, or Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act. Each of 1933, as amended, for transactions not involving public offering.
ITEMsecurities was an accredited investor and each recipient of securities in any transaction exempt from registration either received or had adequate access, through employment, business or other relationships, to information about us. In connection with the private placements effected in 2018 we paid placement agent fee.

Item 16. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)Exhibits

The following exhibits are includedfiled as part of this Form S-1.

registration statement:

Exhibit Number Description
2.13.1** Share Purchase Agreement between 2314505 Ontario Inc., Company, Karen Dalicandro, Donald DalicandroAmended and 2293046 Ontario Inc. (7)
2.2Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and MacroSolve, Inc. dated July 31, 2012 (10)
3.1Restated Certificate of Incorporation of DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. dated June 15, 2011. (1)the Company
3.23.4** Amended and Restated Bylaws (6)of the Company
3.34.1** Specimen Stock Certificate of Designation of Preferences Rights and Limitations of Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred.(6)
3.44.2** CertificateForm of Designation of Preferences Rights and Limitations of Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred.(6)Warrant
3.54.3** CertificateForm of Designation, of the Powers, Preferences and Relative Participating, Optional and Other Special Rights of Preferred Stock and Qualifications, Limitations and Restrictions Thereof of Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. (2)2016 Securities Purchase Agreement
3.64.4** CertificateForm of Amendment to Certificate of Designations of Series C Preferred Stock (11)2018 Subscription Agreement
3.75.1** Amendment No. 2 to CertificateOpinion of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock (12)Polsinelli PC
3.810.1†** Certificate of Designation of Series D Preferred Stock (13)
3.9Amendment No. 1 to Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred Stock (13)
3.10Amendment No. 1 to Certificate of Designation of Series B Preferred Stock (13)
5.1Opinion of Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP*
10.1Arrangement Agreement among DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., Comamtech Inc. and 2259736 Ontario Inc., dated October 20, 2010, incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2011. (1)
10.2Amendment No. 1 to the Arrangement Agreement, dated December 23, 2010, incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2011. (1)
10.3Amendment No. 2 to the Arrangement Agreement, dated March 22, 2011, incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2011. (1)
10.4Amendment No. 3 to the Arrangement Agreement, dated April 8, 2011, incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 14, 2011. (1)

10.5Amendment No. 4 to the Arrangement Agreement, dated April 13, 2011, incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2011. (1)
10.6Ontario Superior court of Justice Commercial List. (1)
10.7Exchange Agreement between DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. and Sigma Opportunity Fund II LLC. (2)
10.8Investor Rights Agreement between DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. and Sigma Opportunity Fund II, LLC and Sigma Capital Advisors, LLC. (2)
10.9Agreement between DecisionPoint Systems, Inc., Sigma Opportunity Fund II, LLC and Donald W. Rowley. (2)
10.10Limited Waiver and Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement between Silicon Valley Bank, DecisionPoint Systems Group Inc., DecisionPoint Systems and CMAC, Inc. (3)
10.11Employment Agreement between DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. and Ralph S. Hubregsen. (4)Steve Smith dated April 11, 2016
10.1210.2†** Transfer and Payment Agreement by and among Empresario Inc., Omar Solis and the Company. (5)
10.132010 Stock Option Plan (6)
10.14Amended Employment Agreement between ApexDecisionPoint Systems, Integrators Inc., Donald Dalicandro and the Company. (7)Steven Smith effective March 25, 2019
10.1510.3†** Form of Convertible Note (7)Restricted Stock Agreement between the DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. and Steven Smith dated March 25, 2019
10.1610.4** Form of DPS Guarantee byLoan and between Company., Karen Dalicandro and 2293046 Ontario Inc. (7)
10.17General Security Agreement between ApexCapitalSource Business Finance Group and DecisionPoint Systems, Integrators Inc., Karen Dalicandro and 2293046 Ontario Inc. (7)dated August 11, 2016
10.1810.5** Escrow Agreement between 2314505 Ontario Inc., Company, Karen Dalicandro, 2293046 Ontario Inc. and McMillan LLP (7)
10.19Noncompetition Agreement between Donald Dalicandro, Karen Dalicandro and 2314505 Ontario Inc. (7)
10.20IP Assignment Agreement between Donald Dalicandro and Apex Systems Integrators Inc. (7)
10.21IP Assignment Agreement between Karen Dalicandro and Apex Systems Integrators Inc. (7)
10.22Credit Agreement between Royal Bank of Canada, Company, 2314505 Ontario Inc. and Apex Systems Integrators Inc. (7)
10.23General Security Agreement between Royal Bank of Canada and Apex Systems Integrators Inc. (7)
10.24General Security Agreement between Royal Bank of Canada and 2314505 Ontario Inc. (7)
10.25Security Agreement between Royal Bank of Canada and the Company (7)
10.26Guarantee between the Company and Royal Bank of Canada (7)
10.27Guaranty between Apex Systems Integrators Inc. and Royal Bank of Canada (7)
10.28Loan Agreement between BDC Capital Inc., the Company, 2314505 Ontario Inc. and Apex Systems Integrators Inc. (7)
10.29General Security Agreement between BDC Capital Inc. and Apex Systems Integrators Inc. (7)
10.30General Security Agreement between BDC Capital Inc. and 2314505 Ontario Inc. (7)
10.31Guarantee between Apex Systems Integrators Inc. and BDC Capital Inc. (7)
10.32Guarantee between the Company and BDC Capital Inc. (7)
10.33Subordination Agreement between BDC Capital Inc. and Silicon Valley Bank (7)
10.34Consent and Waiver Agreement among the Company, Sigma Opportunity Fund II, LLC, Sigma Capital Advisors and Donald W. Rowley (7)

10.35Subordination Agreement between Royal Bank of Canada and Silicon Valley Bank (7)
10.36Subordination and Priorities Agreement among Royal Bank of Canada, BDC Capital Inc., Apex Systems Integrators Inc. and 2314505 Ontario Inc. (7)
10.37Lease Agreement, dated May 7, 2012, between the Company and Nausser Fathollahi and Alladin Doroudi (8)
10.38Separation Agreement and General Release (9)
10.39Accounts Payable Payment Plan (9)
10.40License Agreement between the Company and MacroSolve, Inc. dated July 31, 2012 (10)
10.41Non-Competition Agreement between the Company and MacroSolve, Inc. dated July 31, 2012 (10)
10.42Consent and Waiver Amendment by and among the Company, Sigma Opportunity Fund II, LLC, Sigma Capital Advisors and Donald W. Rowley dated as of October 3, 2012 (11)
10.43Agreement, dated November 15, 2012, by and among the Company, Sigma Opportunity Fund II, LLC and Sigma Capital Advisors, LLC (12)
10.44Form of Securities Purchase Agreement of Series D Preferred Stock (13)
10.45Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, dated December 20, 2012, issued to Placement Agent (13)
10.46Waiver from Royal Bank of Canada (15)
10.47Waiver from BDC (15)
10.48AmendmentFirst Modification to Loan and Security Agreement between CapitalSource Business Finance Group and DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. dated February 27, 2013, between the Company and Silicon Valley Bank (14)June 18, 2018
10.4910.6** Waiver from Royal Bank of Canada, dated May 13, 2013 (16)
10.50Waiver from BDC, dated May 7, 2013 (16)
10.51ForbearanceSecond Modification to Loan and Security Agreement between the CompanyCapitalSource Business Finance Group and Silicon Valley Bank (17)DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. dated August 4, 2020
10.5210.7**# Form of Securities PurchaseAmendment #2 to Master Products and Services Agreement (18)effective April 1, 2020 between DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.
10.5310.8** Form of Investor Warrant (18)Third Modification to Loan and Security Agreement between CapitalSource Business Finance Group and DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. dated September 3, 2020
10.5410.9†** Form of Placement Agent Warrant (18)Award Agreement to 2014 Equity Incentive Plan
2110.10** EIDL Promissory Note
10.11**

Membership Unit Purchase Agreement between DecisionPoint Systems, Inc. and various sellers dated December 4, 2020

21.1**Subsidiaries (19)of DecisionPoint Systems, Inc.
23.1 Consent of BDO USA,Haskell & White LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*an independent registered public accounting firm
23.223.2** Reserved.
23.3Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*
23.4Consent of Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLPPolsinelli PC (included in Exhibit 5.1)*
EX-101.INS24.1** XBRL Instance Document*Power of Attorney (included on the signature page to this registration statement)

**Previously filed.
EX-101.SCH

#

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*

Portions of this Agreement have been omitted.

EX-101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase*
EX-101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase*
EX-101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase*
EX-101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase*Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.

(b) Financial Statement Schedules

No financial statement schedules are provided because the information called for is not required or is shown either in the financial statements or the notes thereto.

II-2


(1)  Incorporated by Reference to the Current Report on form 8-K Filed by the Company on June 21, 2011.
(2)  Incorporated by Reference to the Current Report on form 8-K Filed by the Company on July 7, 2011.
(3)  Incorporated by Reference to the Current Report on form 8-K Filed by the Company on October 13, 2011.
(4)  Incorporated by Reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K Filed by the Company on September 15, 2011.
(5)  Incorporated by Reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K Filed by the Company on September 9, 2011.
(6)  Incorporated by Reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K Filed by the Company on March 30, 2012.
(7)  Incorporated by Reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K Filed by the Company on June 7, 2012.
(8)  Incorporated by Reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K Filed by the Company on June 19, 2012.
(9)  Incorporated by Reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K Filed by the Company on July 27, 2012.
(10) Incorporated by Reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K Filed by the Company on August 6, 2012.
(11) Incorporated by Reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K Filed by the Company on October 10, 2012.
(12) Incorporated by Reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K Filed by the Company on November 21, 2012.
(13) Incorporated by Reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K Filed by the Company on December 26, 2012.
(14)  Incorporated by Reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K Filed by the Company on March 5, 2013.
(15) Incorporated by Reference to the Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 Filed by the Company on April 24, 2013.
(16) Incorporated by Reference to the Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 Filed by the Company on June 19, 2013.
(17) Incorporated by Reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q Filed by the Company on August19, 2013.
(18) Incorporated by Reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K Filed by the Company on August 21, 2013.
(19) Incorporated by Reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 Filed by the Company on February 12, 2013.


*Filed herewith

ITEM

Item 17. UNDERTAKINGS.

1.      Undertakings

The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

(i)      To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933.
(ii)     To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement.
(iii)    To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement.
Provided, however, that paragraphs (B)(1)(i) and (B)(1)(ii) of this section do not apply if the registration statement is on Form S-3, Form S-8 or Form F-3, and the information required to be included in a post-effective amendment by those paragraphs is contained in periodic reports filed with or furnished to the Commission by the Registrant pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act that are incorporated by reference in the registration statement.
2.      The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
3.      The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered that remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
4.      The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for the purposes of determining liability to any purchaser:
 If the registrant is subject to Rule 430C, each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use. 
5.      undertakes:

(1)To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

(i)To include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933.

(ii)To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement.

(iii)To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement;

(2)That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

(3)To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

(4)For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the undersigned registrant accordingpursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the undersigned registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrantregistrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 as amended, and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

II-3


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 4 to the registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Irvine, State of California, on September 23, 2013.

the 19th day of January, 2021.

 DECISIONPOINT SYSTEMS, INC.
 
By:/s/ Steve Smith
Name: Steve Smith
Title:Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and
Director
    
 By:
/s/ Nicholas R. Toms
Melinda Wohl
  Nicholas R. Toms, Chief Executive OfficerName: Melinda Wohl
  Title:Vice President Finance and Administration
(Principal ExecutiveFinancial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the datedates indicated.

NameSignature Title Date
  
/s/ Steve SmithChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
and Director
January 19, 2021
Steve Smith   
     
/s/ Nicholas R. Toms* Chairman and Chief Executive Officer September 23 , 2013January 19, 2021
Nicholas R. TomsStanley P. Jaworski (Principal Executive Officer)Director  
     
/s/ Michael Roe* Vice President, Finance September 23 , 2013January 19, 2021
Michael RoeRichard Bravman (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)Director  
     
*January 19, 2021
Michael N. Taglich DirectorSeptember 23 , 2013
David M. Rifkin  
     
/s/ Jay B. Sheehy*January 19, 2021
John Guttilla DirectorSeptember 23 , 2013
Jay B. Sheehy  
     
/s/ *January 19, 2021
Robert M. ChaikenSchroeder Director September 23 , 2013

* Pursuant to Power of Attorney

By: /s/ Steve Smith
Robert M. ChaikenSteve Smith 
  
DirectorSeptember 23 , 2013
Marc Ferland
/s/ Lawrence YelinDirectorSeptember 23 , 2013
Lawrence Yelin
DirectorSeptember 23 , 2013
Donald Dalicandro
As Attorney-in-Fact 

II-4

 
64