If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ☐

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act.  ☐

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

tend to be slow to change their medical treatment practices because of perceived liability risks arising from the use of new products and the uncertainty of third-party reimbursement. Accordingly, healthcare providers may not recommend the MyoPro until there is sufficient evidence to convince them to alter the treatment methods they typically recommend. This evidence may include prominent healthcare providers or other key opinion leaders in the upper extremity paralysis community recommending the MyoPro as effective in providing identifiable immediate and long-term health benefits, and the publication of additional peer-reviewed clinical studies demonstrating its value. Additionally, because the MyoPro is a prescription device, patients require the prescription of a healthcare provider to access our products and to have the device reimbursed by insurance.

Achieving and maintaining market acceptance of MyoPro products could be negatively impacted by many other factors, including, but not limited to:

Any factors that negatively impact sales of MyoPro would adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.

We may not be able to obtain third-party payor reimbursement, including reimbursement by Medicare, for our products.

Currently, we are almost entirely dependent on third parties to cover the cost of our products to patients and heavily rely on our distributors’ ability to obtain reimbursement for the cost of our products. If the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, or the VA, health insurance companies and other third-party payors do not provide adequate coverage or reimbursement for our products, then our sales will be limited to clinical facilities and individuals who can pay for our devices without reimbursement. To our knowledge, in the year ended December 31, 2018, fewer than 10 units have been self-paid or funded bynon-profit foundations. Some commercial health insurance plans have published statements that they will not cover the cost of the MyoPro for their members, so we have conducted and will continue to conduct appeals for patients covered by such policies to obtain payment authorizations on acase-by-case basis. In the event we are unsuccessful in obtaining coverage and adequate reimbursement for our products from third-party payors, our sales will be significantly constrained. Currently, reimbursement for the cost of our products is obtained primarily on acase-by-case basis until such time, if any, we obtain broad coverage policies with Medicare and third-party payors. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain these broad coverage policies.

In connection with Medicare reimbursement, we have filed the application for a unique Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System, or HCPCS, code applicable to our product line. We received a preliminary decision on our application in May 2018 and in November 2018 we announced that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, had published two new codes pursuant to our application for HCPCS codes, which became effective in January 1, 2019. However, at this time, CMS has not released coverage criteria or the

allowed charge amount for the two new codes. We cannot make any assurance that the amount of reimbursement, if any, to be approved will be sufficient to provide a reasonable profit to us or to our distributors, that the receipt of these codes would result in appropriate coverage and payment terms or otherwise lead to any greater access to our products or reimbursement for such products. We are currently awaiting a decision by CMS on coverage policy and allowable fee for the MyoPro; however, there is no specific timetable or guarantee that CMS will in fact issue such coverage and payment guidelines. In addition, decisions by CMS or other governmental payors on whether and to what extent they would cover our products, as well as decisions on what basis they would cover our products, whether as outright purchases by patients or on a rental basis, may impact similar coverage decisions by private payors that may follow the decisions by governmental payors.

Reimbursement amounts, whether on acase-by-case basis or pursuant to broader coverage policies, which may be established in the future, may be insufficient to permit us to generate sufficient gross margins to allow us to operate on a profitable basis. Third-party payors also may deny coverage, limit reimbursement or reduce their levels of payment, or our costs of production may increase faster than increases in reimbursement levels. In addition, we may not obtain coverage and reimbursement approvals in a timely manner. Our failure to receive such approvals would negatively impact market acceptance of MyoPro.

We depend on a single third party to manufacture the MyoPro and a limited number of third-party suppliers for certain components of the MyoPro.

While we are the manufacturer of record with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, for the MyoPro device we sell, we have contracted with Cogmedix, Inc., or Cogmedix, a contract manufacturer with expertise in the medical device industry, for the contract manufacture of all of our products and the sourcing of all of our components and raw materials. Pursuant to this contract, Cogmedix manufactures the MyoPro pursuant to our specifications at its facility in West Boylston, Massachusetts. As the manufacturer of the MyoPro, we ultimately remain responsible to the FDA for overseeing Cogmedix’s manufacturing activities to ensure that they conform with product specifications and applicable laws and regulations, including FDA’s good manufacturing practice requirements for medical devices. Any failure to effectively oversee the regulatory compliance of the product and contract manufacturing activities by Cogmedix can lead to potential enforcement actions, including civil or criminal liabilities, as well as recalls with the FDA. We may terminate our relationship with Cogmedix at any time upon sixty (60) days’ written notice. For our business strategy to be successful, Cogmedix must be able to manufacture our products in sufficient quantities, and to source raw materials and components, in compliance with regulatory requirements and quality control standards, in accordance with agreed upon specifications, at acceptable costs and on a timely basis. Increases in our product sales, whether forecasted or unanticipated, could strain the ability of Cogmedix to manufacture an increasingly large supply of our current or future products in a manner that meets these various requirements. In addition, although we are not restricted from engaging an alternative manufacturer, the process of moving our manufacturing activities would be time consuming and costly, and may limit our ability to meet our sales commitments, which could harm our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our business. Further, any new contract manufacturer would need to be compliant with FDA regulations and International Organization for Standardization, or ISO, standard 13485.

We also rely on third-party suppliers, some of which contract directly with Cogmedix, to supply certain components of the MyoPro products. Cogmedix does not have long-term supply agreements with most of their suppliers and, in many cases, makes purchases on a purchase order basis. We do not have any long-term supply agreement directly with Cogmedix’s suppliers. Our ability and Cogmedix’s ability to secure adequate quantities of such products may be limited. Suppliers may encounter problems that limit their ability to manufacture components for our products, including financial difficulties or damage to their manufacturing equipment or facilities. If we, or Cogmedix, fail to obtain sufficient quantities of high-quality components to meet demand on a timely basis, or fail to effectively oversee the regulatory compliance of the supply chain, we could face regulatory enforcement, have to conduct recalls, lose customer orders, our reputation may be harmed, and our business could suffer.

Cogmedix generally uses a small number of suppliers for the MyoPro products. Depending on a limited number of suppliers exposes us to risks, including limited control over pricing, availability, quality and delivery schedules. If any one or more of our suppliers ceases to provide sufficient quantities of components in a timely manner or on acceptable terms, Cogmedix would have to seek alternative sources of supply. It may be difficult to engage additional or replacement suppliers in a timely manner. Failure of these suppliers to deliver products at the level our business requires would limit our ability to meet our sales commitments, which could harm our reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our business. Cogmedix also may have difficulty obtaining similar components from other suppliers that are acceptable to the FDA or other regulatory agencies, and the failure of Cogmedix’s suppliers to comply with strictly enforced regulatory requirements could expose us to regulatory action including warning letters, product recalls, termination of distribution, product seizures or civil penalties. It could also require Cogmedix to cease using the components, seek alternative components or technologies and we could be forced to modify our products to incorporate alternative components or technologies, which could result in a requirement to seek additional regulatory approvals. Any disruption of this nature or increased expenses could harm our commercialization efforts and adversely affect our operating results.

We also rely on a limited number of suppliers for the batteries used by the MyoPro and do not maintain any long-term supply agreement with respect to batteries. If we fail to obtain sufficient quantities of batteries in a timely manner, our reputation may be harmed and our business could suffer.

We depend on a related third-party to provide the custom fabrication of the MyoPro.

Currently, we rely on Geauga Rehabilitation Engineering, Inc., or GRE, a small, privately held firm in Chardon, Ohio, to provide custom fabrication services for all MyoPro orders. GRE also provides product development support for the development and prototyping of new MyoPro product designs. GRE is owned by Jonathan Naft, a Myomo executive. However, another member of the GRE management team oversees the fabrication contract that we have entered into for these services which is atarm’s-length. While we are seeking other fabrication partners for the MyoPro, GRE is currently the only provider of MyoPro fabrication services, and our business may be negatively impacted by any difficulties GRE has with its suppliers, operating facilities, trained personnel, and any financial issues. In the event GRE fails to fulfill our orders in a timely manner, then we may terminate our contract. In addition, Mr. Naft’s employment with us isat-will and there can be no assurance that we can retain his services to us. If our relationship with GRE or with Mr. Naft were terminated, we might have difficulty finding a replacement for GRE’s services, in particular, with respect to GRE’s prototyping services. This could result in an adverse impact on our business and financial condition.

Our limited operating history makes it difficult for us to evaluate our future business prospects and make decisions based on those estimates of our future performance.

Since inception through September 30, 2019, we have shipped over 950 units for use by patients at home and at clinical facilities. Our latest product line, the MyoPro, was introduced to the market in fiscal year 2012 and we have shipped approximately 600 units since such time. As a result, we have a limited operating history. It is difficult to forecast our future results based upon our historical data. Because of the uncertainties related to our limited historical operations, we may be hindered in our ability to anticipate and timely adapt to increases or decreases in revenues or expenses.

We have a history of operating losses and our financial statements for September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 include disclosures regarding there being substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have a history of losses since inception. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we incurred a net loss of approximately $8.0 million, and for the year ended December 31, 2018, we incurred a net loss of approximately $10.3 million. At September 30, 2019, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $53.4 million. We expect to continue to incur operating and net losses for the foreseeable future as we expand

our sales and marketing efforts, invest in product development and establish the necessary administrative functions to support our growing operations and being a public company. Our losses in future periods may be greater than the losses we would incur if we developed our business more slowly. In addition, we may find that these efforts are more expensive than we currently anticipate or that these efforts may not result in increases in our revenues, which would further increase our losses. Our cash and cash equivalents balance at September 30, 2019 was approximately $4.3 million, which includes net proceeds from a public offering of our common stock completed in February 2019 of approximately $5.6 million, but excludes the net proceeds from the Term Loan. Despite the successful public offering and the Term Loan closing, we do not expect that existing cash and net proceeds from the offering and Term Loan will be sufficient to fund our operations for the twelve months from the filing date of this prospectus. Therefore, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue operations in the future as a going concern, as disclosed in the notes to the financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018. Although our financial statements raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, they do not reflect any adjustments that might result if we are unable to continue our business. If we cannot continue as a viable entity, our stockholders may lose some or all of their investment in our company

We may not have sufficient funds to meet our future capital requirements.

We have cash and cash equivalents of approximately $4.3 million at September 30, 2019. We will need additional capital and we may be unable to obtain additional funds on reasonable terms, or at all. Our ability to secure financing and the cost of raising such capital are dependent on numerous factors, including general economic and capital markets conditions, credit availability from lenders, investor confidence and the existence of regulatory and tax incentives that are conducive to raising capital. Uncertainty in the financial markets has caused banks and financial institutions to decrease the amount of capital available for lending and has significantly increased the risk premium of such borrowings. In addition, such turmoil and uncertainty has significantly limited the ability of companies to raise funds through the sale of equity or debt securities. If we are unable to raise additional funds, we may need to delay, modify or abandon some or all of our business plans or cease operations. If we raise funds through the issuance of debt, the amount of any indebtedness that we may raise in the future may be substantial, and we may be required to secure such indebtedness with our assets and may have substantial interest expenses. If we default on any future indebtedness, our lenders could declare all outstanding principal and interest to be due and payable and our secured lenders may foreclose on the facilities securing such indebtedness. The incurrence of indebtedness could require us to meet financial and operating covenants, which could place limits on our operations and ability to raise additional capital, decrease our liquidity and increase the amount of cash flow required to service our debt. If we raise funds through the issuance of equity securities, such issuance could result in dilution to our stockholders and the newly issued securities may have rights senior to those of the holders of our common stock.

Our continuation as a going concern is dependent on our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations and to raise additional capital to meet our obligations. Based on our current operating plan, we anticipate that our existing cash and cash equivalents may not be sufficient to enable us to maintain our currently planned operations beyond the next twelve months from the filing date of these financial statements.

Our operating activities may be restricted as a result of covenants related to the outstanding indebtedness under our Term Loan and we may be required to repay the outstanding indebtedness in an event of default, which could have a materially adverse effect on our business.

In October 2019, we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement, Senior Note and Security Agreement, or collectively, the Term Loan with CVP. Under the Term Loan, we received gross proceeds of $3.0 million, excluding fees and expenses. Including an original issue discount, we will repay CVP $3.3 million. The Term Loan bears interest at a rate of 10% and matures 18 months from the closing date. Monthly redemptions of up to $300,000 begin six months from the closing date, with the actual amount to be determined by CVP. CVP has granted us an option to defer up to three redemption payments. If we elect to defer any payments, we will pay

CVP a fee that is the greater of (i) $35,000, or (ii) 1%, 1.25% and 1.5% of the outstanding balance for each deferral, respectively, which shall be added to the outstanding balance. The Term Loan is secured all of our assets, excluding intellectual property.

The Term Loan subjects us to various customary covenants, including requirements relating to our ability to incur certain types of liens on our property, including our intellectual property, restrictions on future financing transactions without CVP’s prior written consent, and restrictions on our ability to pay dividends. Our ability to operate our business may be adversely affected by these restrictions.

Additionally, we are required to repay 50% of the outstanding balance with any proceeds from an equity offering, including this offering and may be required to repay the outstanding indebtedness under the Term Loan if an event of default occurs. Events of default include (i) the failure to repay the Term Loan at maturity; (ii) the failure to make monthly redemption payments; (iii) the failure to make timely filings to the SEC; (iv) the failure to obtain CVP’s prior consent to enter into a fundamental transaction, and (v) conditions of insolvency, receivership and bankruptcy filings. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the outstanding balance shall immediately increase to up to 125% of the outstanding balance. As described in the Term Loan, upon the occurrence of certain events of default, the outstanding balance will become automatically due and payable, and upon the occurrence of other events of default, CVP may declare the outstanding balance immediately due and payable at such time or at any time thereafter. After the occurrence of an event of default, interest on the Term Loan will accrue at a rate per annum of 18%, or such lesser rate as permitted under applicable law. We may not have enough available cash or be able to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings to repay such indebtedness at the time such payments are due, including an event of default. If our available cash and capital resources are insufficient to allow us to make required payments on our debt, we may have to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our debt.

The industries in which we operate are highly competitive and subject to rapid technological change. If our competitors are better able to develop and market products that are safer, more effective, less costly, easier to use, or are otherwise more attractive, we may be unable to compete effectively with other companies.

Industrial and medical robotics is characterized by intense competition and rapid technological change, and we will face competition on the basis of product features, clinical outcomes, price, services and other factors. Competitors may include large medical device and other companies, some of which have significantly greater financial and marketing resources than we do, and firms that are more specialized than we are with respect to particular markets. Our competition may respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies, undertake more extensive marketing campaigns, and have greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do or may be more successful in attracting potential customers, employees and strategic partners.

Our competitive position will depend on multiple complex factors, including our ability to achieve market acceptance for our products, develop new products, implement production and marketing plans, secure regulatory clearances or approvals, if necessary, for products under development and protect our intellectual property. In some instances, competitors may also offer, or may attempt to develop, alternative therapies for disease states that may be delivered without a medical device. The development of new or improved products, processes or technologies by other companies may render our products or proposed products obsolete or less competitive. The entry into the market of manufacturers located inlow-cost manufacturing locations may also create pricing pressure, particularly in developing markets. Our future success depends, among other things, upon our ability to compete effectively against current technology, as well as to respond effectively to technological advances, and upon our ability to successfully implement our marketing strategies and execute our research and development plans.

We utilize distributors who are free to market products that compete with the MyoPro, and we rely on these distributors to market and promote our products in accordance with their FDA listings, select appropriate patients and provide adequatefollow-on care.

We rely on our relationships with qualified orthotics and prosthetics, or O&P providers, the VA and our distribution arrangements to market and sell our products. We believe that a meaningful percentage of our sales will continue to be generated through these channels in the future. However, none of these partners are required to sell or provide our products exclusively. If a key independent O&P provider were to cease to distribute our products, our sales could be adversely affected. In such a situation, we may need to seek alternative independent providers or increase our reliance on our other independent providers or our direct field representatives, which may not prevent our sales from being adversely affected. Additionally, to the extent that we enter into additional arrangements with independent distributors to perform sales, marketing, or distribution services, the terms of the arrangements could cause our profit margins to be lower than if we directly marketed and sold our products.

If these independent O&P providers or distributors do not follow our inclusion/exclusion criteria for patient selection or do not provide adequatefollow-on care, then our reputation may be harmed by patient dissatisfaction. This could also lead to product returns and adversely affect our financial condition. When issues with distributors have arisen in the past, we have supplied additional training and documentation and/or ended the distributor relationship.

The sales and marketing of medical devices is under increased scrutiny by the FDA and other enforcement bodies. If our sales and marketing activities fail to comply with FDA regulations, such as regulations for the labeling and advertising of our products, or other applicable laws, we may be subject to warnings or enforcement actions from the FDA or other enforcement bodies. For example, we are restricted from promoting our products for any use that is beyond the scope of their applicable FDA classification regulation. Such promotion could result in enforcement action by the FDA, which may include, but is not limited to untitled letters or warning letters, injunctions, recall or seizure of our products, and imposition of FDA’s premarket clearance or approval requirements.

The market for myoelectric braces is new and the rate of adoption is uncertain, and important assumptions about the potential market for our products may be inaccurate.

The market for myoelectric braces, or orthotics, is new and the rate of adoption is uncertain. Our estimates of market size are derived from statistics regarding the number of individuals with paralysis, but not necessarily limited to their upper extremities. Accordingly, it is difficult to predict the future size and rate of growth of the market. We cannot be certain whether the market will continue to develop or if orthotics will achieve and sustain a level of market acceptance and demand sufficient for us to continue to generate revenue and achieve profitability.

Limited sources exist to obtain reliable market data with respect to the number of mobility-impaired individuals and the occurrence of upper extremity paralysis in our target markets. In addition, there are no third-party reports or studies regarding what percentage of those with upper extremity paralysis would be able to use orthotics in general, or our current or planned future products in particular. In order to use our current products marketed to those with upper extremity paralysis, users must meet a set of inclusion criteria and not have a medical condition which disqualifies them from being an appropriate candidate. Future products for those with upper extremity paralysis may have the same or other restrictions. Our business strategy is based, in part, on our estimates of the number of upper extremity impaired individuals and the incidence of upper extremity injuries in our target markets and the percentage of those groups that would be able to use our current and future products. Our assumptions and estimates may be inaccurate and may change.

If the upper extremity orthotics market fails to develop or develops more slowly than we expect, or if we have relied on sources or made assumptions or estimates that are not accurate, our business could be adversely affected.

In addition, because we operate in a new market, the actions of our competitors could adversely affect our business. Adverse events such as product defects or legal claims with respect to competing or similar products could cause reputational harm to the market on the whole. Further, adverse regulatory findings or reimbursement-related decisions with respect to other products could negatively impact the entire market and, accordingly, our business.

We may receive a significant number of warranty claims or our MyoPro may require significant amounts of service after sale.

Sales of MyoPro products generally include a three-year warranty for parts and labor, other than for normal wear and tear. As the number and complexity of the features and functionalities of our products increase, we may experience a higher level of warranty claims. If product returns or warranty claims are significant or exceed our expectations, we could incur unanticipated expenditures for parts and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

Defects in our products or the software that drives them could adversely affect the results of our operations.

The design, manufacture and marketing of the MyoPro products involve certain inherent risks. Manufacturing or design defects, unanticipated use of the MyoPro, or inadequate disclosure of risks relating to the use of MyoPro products can lead to injury or other adverse events. In addition, because the manufacturing of our products is outsourced to Cogmedix, we may not always be aware of manufacturing defects that could occur and corrective or preventive actions implemented by Cogmedix may not be effective at resolving such defects. Such adverse events could lead to recalls or safety alerts relating to MyoPro products (either voluntary or required by the FDA or similar governmental authorities in other countries), and could result, in certain cases, in the removal of MyoPro products from the market. A recall could result in significant costs. To the extent any manufacturing defect occurs, our agreement with Cogmedix contains a limitation on Cogmedix’s liability, and therefore we could be required to incur the majority of related costs. Our agreement with GRE does not contain a similar limitation of liability; however, a defect in connection with the fabrication of our products may result in significant costs in connection with lawsuits or refunds. Product defects or recalls could also result in negative publicity, damage to our reputation or, in some circumstances, delays in new product approvals.

MyoPro users may not use MyoPro products in accordance with safety protocols and training, which could enhance the risk of injury. Any such occurrence could cause delay in market acceptance of MyoPro products, damage to our reputation, additional regulatory filings, product recalls, increased service and warranty costs, product liability claims and loss of revenue relating to such hardware or software defects.

The medical device industry has historically been subject to extensive litigation over product liability claims. We have not been subject to such claims to date, but we may become subject to product liability claims alleging defects in the design, manufacture or labeling of our products in the future. A product liability claim, regardless of its merit or eventual outcome, could result in significant legal defense costs and high punitive damage payments. Although we maintain product liability insurance, the coverage is subject to deductibles and limitations, and may not be adequate to cover future claims. Additionally, we may be unable to maintain our existing product liability insurance in the future at satisfactory rates or in adequate amounts.

While there is long-term clinical data supporting the safety of our existing MyoPro products, updates to our products inherently have uncertain safety risks as they enter the market.

While clinical data have established the safety of MyoPro products, our products undergo periodic updates for various reasons, including performance and reliability improvements and cost reductions. Because MyoPro users generally do not have feeling in their upper extremities, they may not immediately notice adverse effects from updates to the MyoPro, which could exacerbate their impact. If MyoPro products are shown to present new risks or to be unsafe or cause such unforeseen effects in the future, our business and reputation could be harmed,

including through field corrections, withdrawals, removals, mandatory product recalls, suspension or withdrawal of FDA registration, significant legal liability or harm to our business reputation.

We may enter into collaborations, licensing arrangements, joint ventures, strategic alliances or partnerships with third parties that may not result in the development of commercially viable products or the generation of significant future revenues.

In the ordinary course of our business, in the future we may enter into collaborations,in-licensing arrangements, joint ventures, strategic alliances or partnerships to develop the MyoPro and to pursue new markets. We are selling the MyoPro in several European countries, as well as countries such as Australia and Chile. In 2019, we announced our intention to enter to technology licenses for the manufacturing and distribution of the MyoPro in international markets, including the Asia Pacific market, and we are continuing to pursue a potential license. Any of these relationships may require us to incurnon-recurring and other charges, increase our near and long-term expenditures, issue securities that dilute our existing stockholders or disrupt our management and business. In addition, proposing, negotiating and implementing collaborations, licensing arrangements, joint ventures, strategic alliances or partnerships may be a competitive lengthy and complex process. We may not identify, secure, or complete any such transactions or arrangements in a timely manner, on a cost-effective basis, on acceptable terms or at all. We have limited institutional knowledge and experience with respect to these business development activities, and we may also not realize the anticipated benefits of any such transaction or arrangement. In particular, these collaborations may not result in the development of products that achieve commercial success or result in significant revenues and could be terminated prior to developing any products. Any delays in entering into new strategic partnership agreements related to our products could delay the development and commercialization of our products in certain geographies, which would harm our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

If we pursue collaborations, licensing arrangements, joint ventures, strategic alliances or partnerships, we may not be able to consummate them, or we may not be in a position to exercise sole decision decision-making authority regarding the transaction or arrangement, which could create the potential risk of creating impasses on decisions, and our collaborators may have economic or business interests or goals that are, or that may become, inconsistent with our business interests or goals. It is possible that conflicts may arise with our collaborators. Our collaborators may act in their self-interest, which may be adverse to our best interest, and they may breach their obligations to us. Any such disputes could result in litigation or arbitration which would increase our expenses and divert the attention of our management. Further, these transactions and arrangements are contractual in nature and may be terminated or dissolved under the terms of the applicable agreements.

If we fail to properly manage our anticipated growth, our business could suffer.

As we expand the number of locations which provide the MyoPro products, including future planned international distribution, we expect that it will place significant strain on our management team and on our financial resources. Failure to manage our growth effectively could cause us to misallocate management or financial resources and result in losses or weaknesses in our infrastructure, systems, processes and controls, which could materially adversely affect our business. Additionally, our anticipated growth will increase the demands placed on our suppliers, resulting in an increased need for us to manage our suppliers and monitor for quality assurance.

Moreover, there are significant costs and risks inherent in selling our products in international markets, including: (a) time and difficulty in building a widespread network of distribution partners; (b) increased shipping and distribution costs, which could increase our expenses and reduce our margins; (c) potentially lower margins in some regions; (d) longer collection cycles in some regions; (e) compliance with foreign laws and regulations; (f) compliance with anti-bribery, anti-corruption, and anti-money laundering laws, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations, by us, our employees, and our business partners; (g) currency exchange rate fluctuations and related effects on our results of operations; (h) economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in foreign economies and markets; (i) compliance with tax, employment,

immigration, and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad; (j) workforce uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in the United States; (k) business interruptions resulting from geopolitical actions, including war and terrorism, or natural disasters, including earthquakes, typhoons, floods and fires; and (l) other costs and risks of doing business internationally, such as new tariffs which may be imposed.

These and other factors could harm our ability to implement planned international operations and, consequently, harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition. Further, we may incur significant operating expenses as a result of our planned international expansion, and it may not be successful. We have limited experience with regulatory environments and market practices internationally, and we may not be able to penetrate or successfully operate in new markets. We may also encounter difficulty expanding into international markets because of limited brand recognition, leading to delayed or limited acceptance of our products by patients in these markets. Accordingly, if we are unable to expand internationally or manage our international operations successfully, we may not achieve the expected benefits of this expansion and our financial condition and results of operations could be harmed.

We depend on the knowledge and skills of our senior management.

We have benefited substantially from the leadership and performance of our senior management and other key employees. We do not carry key person insurance. Our success will depend on our ability to retain our current management and key employees. Competition for these key persons in our industry is intense and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to retain our personnel. The loss of the services of certain members of our senior management or key employees could prevent or delay the implementation and completion of our strategic objectives or divert management’s attention to seeking qualified replacements.

We may seek to grow our business through acquisitions of complementary products or technologies, and the failure to manage acquisitions, or the failure to integrate them with our existing business, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

From time to time, we may consider opportunities to acquire other products or technologies that may enhance our products or technology or advance our business strategies. Potential acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:

We have no current commitments with respect to any acquisition and no current plans to seek acquisitions; however, depending on industry and market conditions, we may consider acquisitions in the future. If we do proceed with acquisitions, we do not know if we will be able to identify acquisitions we deem suitable, whether we will be able to successfully complete any such acquisitions on favorable terms or at all, or whether we will be able to successfully integrate any acquired products or technologies. Our potential inability to integrate any acquired products or technologies effectively may adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Risks Related to Government Regulation

We are subject to extensive governmental regulations relating to the design, development, manufacturing, labeling and marketing of our products, and a failure to comply with such regulations could lead to withdrawal or recall of our products from the market.

Our products are regulated as medical devices in the United States under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FFDCA, as implemented and enforced by the FDA. Under the FFDCA, medical devices are classified into one of three classes–Class I, Class II or Class III–depending on the degree of risk associated with the medical device, what is known about the type of device, and the extent of control needed to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. Classification of a device is important because the class to which a device is assigned determines, among other things, the necessity and type of FDApre-market review. This determination is required prior to marketing the device. See “Business — Government Regulation.”

In 2012, we listed the MyoPro device as a Class I, 510(k)-exempt, limb orthosis with the FDA. From time to time, the FDA may disagree with the classification regulation under which a registrant lists their device. For example, the FDA may disagree with a registrant’s determination to classify their device as a Class I medical device. Instead, the FDA may determine the device to be a Class II or Class III device requiring the submission of a premarket notification, or 510(k), or a premarket approval, or PMA, application for premarket clearance or approval. As the FDA is now giving more attention to the differentiated performance of myoelectric controlled orthotics, we recently elected to change our device listing to be under a Class II classification regulation for biofeedback devices. Under the classification regulation, we believe our device remains 510(k)-exempt as a prescription battery powered external limb orthosis that is indicated for functional improvement are generally 510(k)-exempt under the classification regulation. In the event that the FDA determines that our devices, whether by functionality or marketing claims, exceed the limitations on 510(k)-exemption such that premarket clearance or approval is required (i.e., that our device is intended for a use different from the intended use of a legally marketed device in the generic type of device under the applicable classification regulation or that our modified device operates using a different fundamental scientific technology than such a legally marketed device), should be classified as Class II devices or Class III devices requiring premarket clearance or approval, or should FDA decide to reclassify our device as a Class II or Class III device requiring premarket clearance or approval, we could be precluded from marketing our devices for clinical use within the U.S. for months or longer depending on the requirements of the classification. Obtaining premarket clearance or approval could significantly increase our regulatory costs, including expense associated with requiredpre-clinical (animal) and clinical (human) trials, more extensive mechanical and electrical testing and other costs.

We are registered with the FDA as a manufacturer for medical devices. We are also subject to regulation by foreign governmental agencies in connection with international sales. The agencies enforce laws and regulations that govern the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, advertising, marketing and distribution, and market surveillance of our medical device products. Following the introduction of a product, the governmental agencies will periodically review our product development methodology, quality management systems, and product performance. We are under a continuing obligation to ensure that all applicable regulatory requirements, such as the FDA’s medical device good manufacturing practice / Quality System Regulation, or QSR, requirements and the FDA’s medical device reporting requirements for certain device-related adverse events and malfunction, continue to be met. Our facilities are subject to periodic and unannounced inspection by U.S. and foreign regulatory agencies to audit compliance with the QSR, and comparable foreign regulations.

The process of complying with the applicable QSR, medical device reporting, and other requirements can be costly and time consuming, and could delay or prevent the production, manufacturing or sale of the MyoPro. If the FDA determines that we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, they may issue an inquiry or an untitled or warning letter with one or more citations ofnon-compliance. These inquiries or letters, if not closed promptly, can result in fines, delays or suspensions of regulatory clearances, closure of manufacturing sites, seizures or recalls of products and damage to our reputation. Similarly, if we fail to comply with applicable foreign regulatory requirements, we may be subject to, among other things, fines, suspension or withdrawal of

regulatory approvals, product recalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecution. Recent changes in enforcement practice by the FDA and other agencies have resulted in increased enforcement activity, which increases the compliance risk that we and other companies in our industry are facing.

In addition, governmental agencies of the United States or other countries may impose new requirements regarding registration, labeling or prohibited materials that may require us to modify orre-register the MyoPro once it is already on the market or otherwise impact our ability to market the MyoPro in the US or other countries. The process of complying with these governmental regulations can be costly and time consuming, and could delay or prevent the production, manufacturing or sale of the MyoPro. For instance, the FDA may issue mandates, known as 522 orders, requiring us to conduct post-market surveillance studies of our devices. Failure to comply could result in enforcement of the FFDCA against us or our products including an agency request that we recall our MyoPro products.

Our relationships with healthcare providers and physicians and third-party payors will be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.

We are subject to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and the federal False Claims Act, which may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we sell, market and distribute our products. In particular, the promotion, sales and marketing of healthcare items and services, as well as certain business arrangements in the healthcare industry (e.g. healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payors), are subject to extensive laws designed to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, structuring and commission(s), certain customer incentive programs and other business arrangements generally. We are also subject to patient information and privacy and security regulation by both the federal government and the states and foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct business. The applicable federal, state and foreign healthcare laws and regulations laws that may affect our ability to operate include, but are not limited to:

The scope and enforcement of each of these laws is uncertain and subject to rapid change in the current environment of healthcare reform. Federal and state enforcement bodies often scrutinize interactions between healthcare companies and healthcare providers, which has led to a number of investigations, prosecutions, convictions and settlements in the healthcare industry. Ensuring business arrangements comply with applicable healthcare laws, as well as responding to possible investigations by government authorities, can be time- and resource-consuming and can divert a company’s attention from the business.

The failure to comply with any of these laws or regulatory requirements subject entities to possible legal or regulatory action. Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors available, it is possible that some of our business activities, could, despite efforts to comply, be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. It is possible that governmental and enforcement authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law interpreting applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. Depending on the circumstances, failure to meet applicable regulatory requirements can result in civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, individual imprisonment, exclusion from participation in federal and state funded healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm and the curtailment or restricting of our operations, as well as additional reporting obligations and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or other agreement to resolve allegationsof non-compliance with these laws. Any action for violation of these laws, even if successfully defended, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert management’s attention from the operation of the business. Prohibitions or restrictions on sales or withdrawal of future marketed products could materially affect business in an adverse way. Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements will comply with applicable healthcare laws may involve substantial costs. In addition, the commercialization of any of our products outside the United States will also likely subject us to foreign equivalents of the healthcare laws mentioned above, among other foreign laws.

If we or our third-party manufacturers or key suppliers fail to comply with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, our manufacturing operations could be interrupted.

Our key suppliers are also required to comply with the FDA’s QSR which covers the methods and documentation of the production, control, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, storage and shipping of our products. Cogmedix, our electromechanical kit manufacturer, and other key suppliers are also subject to the regulations of foreign jurisdictions regarding the manufacturing process with respect to the market for our products abroad.

We continue to monitor our quality management with our third-party manufacturers and suppliers to improve our overall level of compliance. Our facilities and those of our third-party manufacturers and key suppliers are subject to periodic and unannounced inspection by U.S. and foreign regulatory agencies to audit compliance with the QSR and comparable foreign regulations. If the facilities of our third-party manufacturers and suppliers are found to be in violation of applicable laws and regulations, or if our third-party manufacturers and suppliers fail to take satisfactory corrective action in response to an adverse inspection, the regulatory authority could take enforcement action, including any of the following sanctions:

Any of these sanctions could impair our ability to produce the MyoPro in a cost-effective and timely manner in order to meet our customers’ demands and could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition. We may also be required to bear other costs or take other actions that may have a negative impact on our future sales and our ability to generate profits.

European data collection is governed by restrictive regulations governing the use, processing, and cross-border transfer of personal information.

The collection and use of personal health data in the European Union is governed by the provisions of the Data Protection Directive, and as of May 2018 the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR. These directives impose several requirements relating to the consent of the individuals to whom the personal data relates, the information provided to the individuals, notification of data processing obligations to the competent national data protection authorities and the security and confidentiality of the personal data. The Data Protection Directive and GDPR also impose strict rules on the transfer of personal data out of the European Union to the United States. Failure to comply with the requirements of the Data Protection Directive, the GDPR, and the related national data protection laws of the European Union Member States may result in fines and other administrative penalties. The GDPR introduces new data protection requirements in the European Union and substantial fines for breaches of the data protection rules. Notably, on January 21, 2019, Google was fined almost $57 million by French regulators for violating GDPR. The GDPR regulations may impose additional responsibility and liability in relation to personal data that we process and we may be required to put in place additional mechanisms ensuring compliance with the new data protection rules. This may be onerous and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We face risks in connection with the Affordable Care Act or its possible replacement or modifications.

The United States and many foreign jurisdictions have enacted or proposed legislative and regulatory changes affecting the healthcare system that could affect our ability to profitably sell our products. Changes in regulations, statutes or the interpretation of existing regulations could impact our business in the future by requiring, for example: (i) changes to our manufacturing arrangements; (ii) additions or modifications to product labeling; (iii) the recall or discontinuation of our products; or (iv) additional record-keeping requirements. If any such changes were to be imposed, they could adversely affect the operation of our business.

In the United States, there have been and continue to be a number of legislative initiatives and judicial challenges to contain healthcare costs. For example, in March 2010, the ACA was passed, which substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers, generally increased the number of people with health insurance and significantly impacted the United States medical device industry to which we sell our products. Among other things, the Affordable Care Act:

There have been a number of significant changes to the ACA and its implementation. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the Tax Act, includes a provision that repealed effective January 1, 2019 thetax-based shared

responsibility payment imposed by the ACA on certain individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year that is commonly referred to as the “individual mandate.” On December 14, 2018, a U.S. District Court Judge in the Northern District of Texas, or the Texas District Court Judge, ruled that the individual mandate is a critical and inseverable feature of the ACA, and therefore, because it was repealed as part of the Tax Act, the remaining provisions of the ACA are invalid as well. The Trump Administration and CMS have both stated that the ruling will have no immediate effect, and on December 30, 2018 the Texas District Court Judge issued an order staying the judgment pending appeal. On July 9, 2019, the Fifth Circuit US Court of Appeals held a hearing to determine whether certain states and the House of Representatives have standing to appeal the lower court decision, but it is unclear when the Court will render its decision and what effect it will have on the status of the ACA. Litigation and legislation over the ACA are likely to continue with unpredictable and uncertain results. We will continue to evaluate the effect that the ACA and its possible repeal and replacement has on our business.

On January 20, 2017, President Trump signed an Executive Order directing federal agencies with authorities and responsibilities under the ACA to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision of the ACA that would impose a fiscal burden on states or a cost, fee, tax, penalty or regulatory burden on individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals or medical devices. On October 13, 2017, President Trump signed an Executive Order terminating the cost-sharing subsidies that reimburse insurers under the ACA. The Trump administration has concluded that cost-sharing reduction, or CSR, payments to insurance companies required under the ACA have not received necessary appropriations from Congress and announced that it will discontinue these payments immediately until those appropriations are made. The loss of the CSR payments is expected to increase premiums on certain policies issued by qualified health plans under the ACA. Several state Attorneys General filed suit to stop the administration from terminating the subsidies, but their request for a restraining order was denied by a federal judge in California on October 25, 2017. The Bipartisan Health Care Stabilization Act of 2017, as well as thefollow-on Bipartisan Health Care Stabilization Act of 2018 were introduced to appropriate funds to stabilize CSR payments; however, the future of this effort is unclear. On June 14, 2018, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the federal government was not required to pay more than $12 billion in ACA risk corridor payments to third-party payors who argued were owed to them. The effects of this gap in reimbursement on third-party payors, the viability of the ACA marketplace, providers, and potentially our business, are not yet known.

Moreover, on January 22, 2018, President Trump signed a continuing resolution on appropriations for fiscal year 2018 that delayed the implementation of certainACA-mandated fees, including the so called “Cadillac” tax on certain high cost employer-sponsored insurance plans, the annual fee imposed on certain health insurance providers based on market share, and the medical device excise tax onnon-exempt medical devices. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, also amended the ACA, effective January 1, 2019, by increasing thepoint-of-sale discount that is owed by pharmaceutical manufacturers who participate in Medicare Part D and closing the coverage gap in most Medicare drug plans, commonly referred to as the “donut hole.” In July 2018, CMS published a final rule permitting further collections and payments to and from certain ACA qualified health plans and health insurance issuers under the ACA risk adjustment program in response to the outcome of federal district court litigation regarding the method CMS uses to determine this risk adjustment. In addition, CMS published a final rule that would give states greater flexibility, starting in 2020, in setting benchmarks for insurers in the individual and small group marketplaces, which may have the effect of relaxing the essential health benefits required under the ACA for plans sold through such marketplaces.

In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the ACA was enacted. In August 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, resulted in aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect in 2013, and, due to subsequent legislative amendments, will remain in effect through 2029 unless additional Congressional action is taken. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 further reduced Medicare payments to several types of providers, including hospitals and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years.

In response to perceived increases in healthcare costs in recent years, there have been and continue to be proposals by the Presidential administrations, members of Congress, state governments, regulators and third-party payors to control these costs and, more generally, to reform the United States healthcare system, including by repealing or replacing the ACA. Health care reform imposed a Medical Device Excise Tax (“the MDET”) on medical device manufacturers through the end of 2015. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, enacted in December 2015, included atwo-year moratorium on MDET such that medical device sales in 2016 and 2017 were exempt from the MDET. New legislation was passed in January 2018 such that implementation of the MDET was suspended until January 1, 2020. Although the MDET was suspended, if this suspension is not continued or made permanent thereafter, the MDET will be automatically reinstated starting on January 1, 2020 and would result in a significant increase in the tax burden on our industry, which could have a material negative impact on our financial condition, results of operations and our cash flows. Other elements of health care reform such as comparative effectiveness research, an independent payment advisory board, payment system reforms including shared savings pilots and other provisions could meaningfully change the way healthcare is developed and delivered, and may materially adversely impact numerous aspects of our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We expect that the ACA, as well as other healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future, may result in additional reductions in Medicare and other healthcare funding, more rigorous coverage criteria, lower reimbursement, and new payment methodologies. This could lower the price that we receive for our products. Any denial in coverage or reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government-funded programs may result in a similar denial or reduction in payments from private payors, which may prevent us from being able to generate sufficient revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our products. Litigation and legislative efforts to change or repeal the ACA are likely to continue, with unpredictable and uncertain results. It is not clear how these developments, or other future potential changes to the ACA, will change the reimbursement model and market outlook for O&P devices such as the MyoPro. We intend to monitor industry trends relative to the ACA to assist in our determination of how the MyoPro can fit into patient care protocols with providers such as rehabilitation hospitals and surgery centers. If reimbursement policies change significantly, the demand for MyoPro products may be impacted.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

We depend on certain patents that are licensed to us. We do not control these patents and any loss of our rights to them could prevent us from manufacturing our products.

We rely on licenses to two core patents that are material to our business, including the development of the MyoPro. We have entered into the MIT License for those certain patents that cover (i) a powered orthotic device worn on a patient’s elbow or other joint, that senses relatively low level signals in the vicinity of the joint generated by a patient having spinal cord or other nerve damage and (ii) a method of providing rehabilitation movement training for a person suffering from nerve damage, stroke, spinal cord injury, neurological trauma or neuromuscular disorder in attempt to move a body part with a powered orthotic device. Our rights to use these patents will be subject to the continuation of and our compliance with the terms of those licenses.

On November 15, 2016, we entered into a waiver agreement with MIT, with regard to certain obligations, or the Obligations Waiver, under the MIT License. The Obligations Waiver contemplates that we have not met certain revenue obligations, or the Revenue Obligations, and certain commercialization obligation, or the Commercial Obligations, which are required under the MIT License. Pursuant to the Revenue Obligations, we were originally obligated to have net sales of at least $200,000, $250,000, $500,000 and $750,000 in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 (and each year thereafter), respectively. Pursuant to the Commercialization Obligations, we were originally obligated to introduce a home version of a “licensed product” on or before December 31, 2010, expand distribution of a licensed product to 10 major metropolitan areas on or before December 31, 2011 and expand distribution to at least one country outside of the United States on or before December 31, 2012. The Obligations Waiver waives any and all Revenue Obligations up to the date of the waiver agreement and waives the

Commercialization Obligations up to and through the date of the waiver agreement. The Commercialization Obligations have expired as of the date hereof and do not need to be complied with in the future. Our revenue exceeded $750,000 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, which satisfied the Revenue Obligations for each of those fiscal years. In addition, our revenue exceeded $750,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The Revenue Obligations are a continuing requirement of the MIT License . While we expect to exceed the required revenue and satisfy the Revenue Obligations in future years, we cannot make any assurance that we will continue to comply with these obligations. Additionally, MIT has the right to terminate the MIT License upon any future uncured material breach of the agreement or if we fail to make any payments due under the agreement. If the MIT License is terminated for any reason, our business will be harmed.

Specifically, if we were to lose access to these licenses, we would be unable to manufacture the MyoPro or develop new products until we obtained access to a comparable technology.

We may not control the prosecution, maintenance or filing of the patents to which we now hold or in the future intend to acquire licenses. Enforcement of our licensed patents or defense of any claims asserting the invalidity of these patents may be subject to the control or cooperation of our licensors. We cannot be certain that our licensors will prosecute, maintain, enforce and defend the licensed patent rights in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business. We also cannot be certain that drafting or prosecution of the licensed patents and patent applications by the relevant licensors have been or will be conducted in compliance with applicable law.

Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain protection for the intellectual property relating to or incorporated into our products.

Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain protection for the intellectual property relating to or incorporated into our products. We seek to protect our intellectual property through a combination of patents, trademarks, confidentiality and assignment agreements with our employees and certain of our contractors and confidentiality agreements with certain of our consultants, scientific advisors and other vendors and contractors. In addition, we rely on trade secrets law to protect our proprietary software and product candidates or products in development.

The patent position of myoelectric orthotic inventions can be highly uncertain and involves many new and evolving complex legal, factual and technical issues. Patent laws and interpretations of those laws are subject to change and any such changes may diminish the value of our patents or narrow the scope of protection. In addition, we may fail to apply for or be unable to obtain patents necessary to protect our technology or products or enforce our patents due to lack of information about the exact use of technology or processes by third parties. Also, we cannot be sure that any patents will be granted in a timely manner or at all with respect to any of our patent pending applications or that any patents that are granted will be adequate to protect our intellectual property for any significant period of time or at all.

Litigation to establish or challenge the validity of patents, or to defend against or assert against others infringement, unauthorized use, enforceability or invalidity claims, can be lengthy and expensive and may result in our patents being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our not being granted new patents related to our pending patent applications. Even if we prevail, litigation may be time consuming and force us to incur significant costs, and any damages or other remedies awarded to us may not be valuable and management’s attention could be diverted from managing our business. In addition, U.S. patents and patent applications may be subject to interference proceedings, and U.S. patents may be subject tore-examination and review in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Foreign patents may also be subject to opposition or comparable proceedings in the corresponding foreign patent offices. Any of these proceedings may be expensive and could result in the loss of a patent or denial of a patent application, or the loss or reduction in the scope of one or more of the claims of a patent or patent application.

In addition, we seek to protect our trade secrets,know-how and confidential information that is not patentable by entering into confidentiality and assignment agreements with our employees and certain of our contractors and

confidentiality agreements with certain of our consultants, scientific advisors and other vendors and contractors. However, we may fail to enter into the necessary agreements, and even if entered into, these agreements may be breached or otherwise fail to prevent disclosure, third-party infringement or misappropriation of our proprietary information, may be limited as to their term and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure or use of proprietary information. Enforcing a claim that a third party illegally obtained and is using our trade secrets is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. We also have taken precautions to initiate reasonable safeguards to protect our information technology systems. However, these measures may not be adequate to safeguard our proprietary information, which could lead to the loss or impairment thereof or to expensive litigation to defend our rights against competitors who may be better funded and have superior resources. In addition, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or reverse engineer certain aspects of our products that we consider proprietary or our proprietary information may otherwise become known or may be independently developed by our competitors or other third parties. If other parties are able to use our proprietary technology or information, our ability to compete in the market could be harmed.

Further, unauthorized use of our intellectual property may have occurred, or may occur in the future, without our knowledge.

If we are unable to obtain or maintain adequate protection for intellectual property, or if any protection is reduced or eliminated, competitors may be able to use our technologies, resulting in harm to our competitive position.

We are not able to protect our intellectual property rights in all countries.

Filing, prosecuting, maintaining and defending patents on each of our products in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and thus our intellectual property rights outside the United States are currently limited to the European Union and Japan. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries, especially developing countries, do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the United States. Also, it may not be possible to effectively enforce intellectual property rights in some countries at all or to the same extent as in the United States and other countries. Consequently, we are unable to prevent third parties from using our inventions in all countries, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in the jurisdictions in which we do not have (or are unable to effectively enforce) patent protection. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop, market or otherwise commercialize their own products, and we may be unable to prevent those competitors from importing those infringing products into territories where we have patent protection, but enforcement is not as strong as in the United States. These products may compete with our products and our patents and other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing in those jurisdictions. Moreover, competitors or others in the chain of commerce may raise legal challenges against our intellectual property rights or may infringe upon our intellectual property rights, including through means that may be difficult to prevent or detect.

Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in the United States or foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke third parties to assert patent infringement or other claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate, and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights in the United States and around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license from third parties.

We may be subject to patent infringement claims, which could result in substantial costs and liability and prevent us from commercializing our current and future products.

The medical device industry is characterized by competing intellectual property and a substantial amount of litigation over patent rights. In particular, our competitors in both the United States and abroad, many of which have substantially greater resources and have made substantial investments in competing technologies, have been issued patents and filed patent applications with respect to their products and processes and may apply for other patents in the future. The large number of patents, the rapid rate of new patent issuances, and the complexities of the technology involved increase the risk of patent litigation.

Determining whether a product infringes a patent involves complex legal and factual issues and the outcome of patent litigation is often uncertain. Even though we have conducted research of issued patents, no assurance can be given that patents containing claims covering our products, technology or methods do not exist, have not been filed or could not be filed or issued. In addition, because patent applications can take years to issue and because publication schedules for pending applications vary by jurisdiction, there may be applications now pending of which we are unaware and may result in issued patents which our current or future products infringe. Also, because the claims of published patent applications can change between publication and patent grant, published applications may issue with claims that potentially cover our products, technology or methods.

Infringement actions and other intellectual property claims brought against us, with or without merit, may cause us to incur substantial costs and could place a significant strain on our financial resources, divert the attention of management and harm our reputation. We cannot be certain that we will successfully defend against any allegations of infringement. If we are found to infringe another party’s patents, we could be required to pay damages. We could also be prevented from selling our products that infringe, unless we could obtain a license to use the technology covered by such patents or could redesign our products so that they do not infringe. A license may be available on commercially reasonable terms or none at all, and we may not be able to redesign our products to avoid infringement. Further, any modification to our products could require us to conduct clinical trials and revise our filings with the FDA and other regulatory bodies, which would be time consuming and expensive. In these circumstances, we may not be able to sell our products at competitive prices or at all, and our business and operating results could be harmed.

We rely on trademark protection to distinguish our products from the products of our competitors.

We rely on trademark protection to distinguish our products from the products of our competitors. We have registered the trademarks “MyoPro” (Registration No. 4,532,331) and “MYOMO” (Registration No. 4,451,445) in the United States. The MyoPro mark is registered in Canada and in selected European Union, or EU, countries with pending registration. In jurisdictions where we have not yet registered our trademark and are using it, and as permitted by applicable local law, we seek to rely on common law trademark protection where available. Third parties may oppose our trademark applications, or otherwise challenge our use of the trademarks, and may be able to use our trademarks in jurisdictions where they are not registered or otherwise protected by law. If our trademarks are successfully challenged or if a third party is using confusingly similar or identical trademarks in particular jurisdictions before we do, we could be forced to rebrand our products, which could result in loss of brand recognition, and could require us to devote additional resources to marketing new brands. If others are able to use our trademarks, our ability to distinguish our products may be impaired, which could adversely affect our business. Further, we cannot assure you that competitors will not infringe upon our trademarks, or that we will have adequate resources to enforce our trademarks.

We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that our employees or we have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employers.

Some of our employees were previously employed at other medical device companies, including our competitors or potential competitors, and we may hire employees in the future that are so employed. We could in the future

be subject to claims that these employees, or we, have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of their former employers. If we fail in defending against such claims, a court could order us to pay substantial damages and prohibit us from using technologies or features that are found to incorporate or be derived from the trade secrets or other proprietary information of the former employers. If any of these technologies or features are important to our products, this could prevent us from selling those products and could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, such litigation could result in substantial costs and divert the attention of management.

Risks Related to this Offering

Our stockholders will experience significant dilution upon the issuance of common stock if the shares of our common stock underlying our warrants, including those issued in this offering, are exercised or converted.

We have a significant number of securities convertible into, or allowing the purchase of, our common stock. Investors could be subject to increased dilution upon the conversion or exercise of these securities. For example, as of September 30, 2019,2022, we had 5,435,287691,554 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants, with a weighted-average exercise price of $2.88$8.17 per share, and 668,78530,780 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options under our equity incentive plans, with a weighted-average exercise price of $2.11$ 26.83 per share. In addition, we have 10,266 shares of unvested489,520 restricted stock outstanding, with a per share fair valueunits were outstanding. Further, as of $6.75 when grantedSeptember 30, 2022, we had $5 million in August 2017, with lapsing forfeiture rights extending up to 48 months. We issued warrants to purchase shares issuable upon sales of our common stock in our December 2017 public offering, of which warrants to purchase 3,560,894 shares of common stock remainunder our Purchase Agreement with Keystone Capital, LLC. Sales under the Purchase Agreement are subject to a remaining cap of 1,349,348 shares, based on 19.99% of our outstanding asshares of September 30, 2019. The common stock warrants that we issued in our December 2017 public offering have an exercise price of $2.95 per share and such exercise price is adjustable if we effect a stock split or combination or similar transaction, depending on the relative trading prices before and afterexecution date, unless approved by shareholders or individual issuances are considered above market under the combination. Such common stock warrants also have anti-dilution protection in the event that we issue equity securities in the future below the then-exercise price of such warrants. The exercise price of these warrants has been repriced from $2.95 per share to $1.40 per share, the price per share in our February 2019 underwritten public offering. If the offering pricerules of the shares in this offering is below the current exercise price of these warrants, the exercise price of these warrants will again have to be repriced. Furthermore, additional shares will be issued upon the exercise of the common stock warrants offered in this offering.NYSE American. The issuance of additional shares as a result of such conversion or purchase, or their subsequent sale, could adversely affect the price of our common stock.

YouIf you purchase our securities in this offering, you may in the future incur dilution in the book value of your shares.

Although you will experiencenot incur immediate and substantial dilution as a result of this offering.

You will incur immediate and substantial dilution as a result of this Offering. The combined public offering, price per share of common stock and related warrant of $         is substantially higher thanto the as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock. You will incur immediate and substantialextent outstanding options or warrants are exercised, you may experience future dilution of $         per shareyour equity interests in the as adjusted net tangible book value of shares of our common stock, based on the combined offering price per share of common stock and related warrant of $        .Company. As a result of thepossible future dilution, to investors purchasing sharessecurities in this offering investors may receive significantly less than the purchase price paid in this offering, if anything, in the event of our liquidation. In addition,

This is a reasonable best efforts offering, in which no minimum number or dollar amount of securities is required to be sold, and we may not raise the extent outstanding options and warrants are ultimately exercised, there will be further dilutionamount of capital we believe is required for our business plans.

The placement agent has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to solicit offers to purchase the securities in this offering. The placement agent has no obligation to buy any of the securities from us or to arrange for the purchase or sale of any specific number or dollar amount of the securities. There is no required minimum number of securities that must be sold as a condition to completion of this offering, and there can be no assurance that the offering contemplated hereby will ultimately be consummated. Even if we sell securities offered hereby, because there is no minimum offering amount required as a condition to the closing of this offering, the actual offering amount is not presently determinable and may be substantially less than the maximum amount set forth above. We may sell fewer than all of the securities offered hereby, which may significantly reduce the amount of proceeds received by us. Thus, we may not raise the amount of capital we believe is required for our operations in the short-term and may need to raise additional funds, which may not be available or available on terms acceptable to us.

Because there is no minimum required for the offering to close, investors in this offering will not receive a refund in the event that we do not sell an amount of securities sufficient to pursue the business goals outlined in this prospectus.

We have not specified a minimum offering amount in connection with this offering. Because there is no minimum offering amount, investors could be in a position where they have invested in our company, but we are

delisting of our common stock from the NYSE American may materially impair our stockholders’ ability to buy and sell our common stock and could have an adverse effect on the market price of, and the efficiency of theactive trading market for our common stock. A delistingstock and the lack of an active public trading market could mean that investors may be exposed to increased risk. In addition, if we failed to meet the criteria set forth in SEC regulations, various requirements would be imposed by law on broker-dealers who sell our securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. Consequently, such regulations may deter broker-dealers from recommending or selling our common stock, which may further affect its liquidity.

Our management will have broad discretion over the use of the net proceeds from this offering, you may not agree with how we use the proceeds, and the proceeds may not be invested successfully.

We have not designated all of the net proceeds from this offering to be used for particular purposes. Accordingly, our management will have broad discretion as to the use of the net proceeds from this offering and could significantly impairuse them for purposes other than those contemplated at the time of commencement of this offering. Accordingly, you will be relying on the judgment of our management with regard to the use of these net proceeds, and you will not have the opportunity, as part of your investment decision, to assess whether the proceeds are being used appropriately. It is possible that, pending their use, we may invest the net proceeds in a way that does not yield a favorable, or any, return for our company. Our management’s judgment may not result in positive returns on your investment and you will not have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial or other information upon which our management bases its decisions.

We will need to raise additional funding to fund our working capital needs or consummate potential future acquisitions. Additional financing may not be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain additional capital may force us to limit or terminate our operations.

Even if we sell all securities offered hereby, the expected net proceeds of this offering may not be sufficient for us to fund the working capital needs of our business or potential strategic acquisitions we may pursue in the future. We may continue to seek funds through equity or debt financings, collaborative or other arrangements with corporate sources, or through other sources of financing. Additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. Any failure to raise capital as and when needed could have a negative impact on our financial condition and on our ability to raise capital.pursue our business plans and strategies.

There is no public market for our warrants to purchase common stock.the Pre-Funded Warrants being offered in this offering.

There is no established public trading market for our warrantsthe Pre-Funded Warrants being offered in this offering, and we do not expect a market to develop. In addition, we do not intend to apply for listing ofto list the warrantsPre-Funded Warrants on any securities exchange.exchange or nationally recognized trading system. Without an active market, the liquidity of such warrantsthe Pre-Funded Warrants will be limited.

Holders of our warrantsthe Pre-Funded Warrants will have no rights as aholders of common stockholderstock until such holders exercise their warrants and acquire our common stock.are exercised.

Until holders of warrantsyou acquire shares of our common stock upon exercise of the warrants, holders of warrantsyour Pre-Funded Warrants, you will have no rights with respect to the shares of our common stock underlying such warrants.issuable upon exercise of your Pre-Funded Warrants. Upon exercise of the warrants, the holders thereofyour Pre-Funded Warrants, you will be entitled to exercise the rights of a common stockholderholder of shares only as to matters for which the record date occurs after the exercise date.

Our principal stockholders and management beneficially own a significant percentage of our stock and will be able to exert significant influence over matters subject to stockholder approval.

As of September 30, 2019, our executive officers, directors, principal stockholders and their affiliates beneficially owned approximately 13% of our outstanding voting stock. Therefore, these stockholders will have the ability to influence us through this ownership position. These stockholders may be able to significantly affect matters requiring stockholder approval, including elections of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, and approval of any merger, sale of assets, or other major corporate transaction. This may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our common stock that you may believe are in your best interest as one of our stockholders.

The market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile.

The stock market in general, and the market price of our common stock in particular will likely be subject to fluctuation, whether due to, or irrespective of, our operating results, financial condition and prospects. For example, from June 9, 2017 to December 2, 2019, the high and low sales price of our common stock on the NYSE American has fluctuated from a low of $0.43 to a high of $23.20 per share.

Our financial performance, our industry’s overall performance, changing consumer preferences, technologies, government regulatory action, tax laws and market conditions in general could have a significant impact on the future market price of our common stock. Some of the other factors that could negatively affect our share price or result in fluctuations in our share price include:

We do not expect to declare or pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

We do not expect to declare or pay dividends in the foreseeable future, as we anticipate that we will invest future earnings in the development and growth of our business. In addition, the Term Loan with CVP prohibits the payment of dividends. Therefore, holders of our common stock will not receive any return on their investment unless they sell their securities, and holders may be unable to sell their securities on favorable terms or at all.

We have elected to publicly report on an ongoing basis as an “emerging growth company” (as defined in the JOBS Act) under the reporting rules set forth under the Exchange Act. For so long as we remain an “emerging growth company,” we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other Exchange Act reporting companies that are not “emerging growth companies”.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies,” including exemption from compliance with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in the Annual Report on Form10-K and our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding anon-binding advisory vote on executive compensation.

We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) in 2022, (b) the date on which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion, or (c) the date on which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common stock that is held bynon-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th , and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion innon-convertible debt during the prior three-year period.

Even after we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, we may under certain circumstances still qualify as a “smaller reporting company,” which would allow us to take advantage of many of the same exemptions from disclosure requirements including exemption from compliance with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (so long as we are anon-accelerated filer) and reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting certain new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have elected to avail ourselves of this provision of the JOBS Act.

We are obligated to develop and maintain a system of effective internal control over financial reporting. We may not complete our analysis of our internal control over financial reporting in a timely manner, or these internal controls may not be determined to be effective, which may harm investor confidence in our company and, as a result, the value of our common stock.

We are required, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in the annual and quarterly reports we file with the SEC. This assessment will need to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting. However, our

American and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose various requirements on public companies. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to compliance with these requirements. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly.

Future issuances of our common stock or equity-related securities could cause the market price of our common stock to decline and would result in the dilution of your holdings.

Future issuances of our common stock or securities convertible into our common stock could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. We cannot predict the effect, if any, of future issuances of our common stock or securities convertible into our common stock on the price of our common stock. In all events, future issuances of our common stock would result in the dilution of your holdings. In addition, the perception that new issuances of our common stock, or other securities convertible into our common stock, could occur, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Future issuances of debt securities, which would rank senior to our common stock upon our bankruptcy or liquidation, and future issuances of preferred stock, which could rank senior to our common stock for the purposes of dividends and liquidating distributions, may adversely affect our common stock price.

In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by offering debt securities. Upon bankruptcy or liquidation, holders of our debt securities, and lenders with respect to other borrowings we may make, would receive distributions of our available assets prior to any distributions being made to holders of our common stock. Moreover, if we issue preferred stock, the holders of such preferred stock could be entitled to preferences over holders of common stock in respect of the payment of dividends and the payment of liquidating distributions. Because our decision to issue debt or preferred securities in any future offering, or borrow money from lenders, will depend in part on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of any such future offerings or borrowings. Holders of our common stock must bear the risk that any future offerings we conduct or borrowings we make may adversely affect the level of return they may be able to achieve from an investment in our common stock.

If our shares of common stock become subjecton their holders, such as voting rights or the right to receive dividends, but rather merely represent the penny stock rules, it would become more difficultright to trade our shares.

The SEC, has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or authorized for quotation on certain automated quotation systems, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system. If we do not retain a listing on the NYSE American or another national securities exchange and if the price of our common stock is less than $5.00, our common stock will be deemed a penny stock. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, before a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document containing specified information. In addition, the penny stock rules require that before effecting any transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, a broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive (i) the purchaser’s written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement; (ii) a written agreement to transactions involving penny stocks; and (iii) a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for our common stock, and therefore stockholders may have difficulty selling their shares.

Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us more difficult, limit attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management and limit the market price of our common stock.

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control or changes in our management. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws include provisions that:

These provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace membersstock at a fixed price. Specifically, commencing on the date of our board of directors, which is responsible for appointing the members of our management. In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203issuance, holders of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, which generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in anyPre-Funded Warrants may acquire shares of a broad rangecommon stock issuable upon exercise of business combinations with any “interested” stockholder for a periodsuch warrants at an exercise price of three years$0.0001 per share of common stock. Moreover, following this offering, the date on which the stockholder became an “interested” stockholder. Anymarket value of the foregoing provisions could limitPre-Funded Warrants is uncertain, and there can be no assurance that the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock, and they could deter potential acquirers of our company, thereby reducing the likelihood that you would receive a premium for your common stock in an acquisition.

We may be subject to adverse legislative or regulatory changes in tax laws that could negatively impact our financial condition.

The rules dealing with U.S. federal, state and local income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department. Changes to tax laws (which changes may have retroactive application) could adversely affect our stockholders or us. In recent years, many such changes have been made. For example, the U.S. government recently enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or the TCJA, that significantly reforms the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. The TCJA, among other things, contains significant changes to corporate taxation, including a reductionmarket value of the corporate tax rate from a top marginal tax rate of 35% to a flat rate of 21%, a limitation of the tax deduction for interest expense to 30% of taxable income (except for certain small businesses), a limitation of the deduction for net operating losses to 80% of annual taxable income for losses arising in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and an elimination of net operating loss carrybacks for losses arising in taxable years ending after December 31, 2017 (though any such net operating losses may be carried forward indefinitely) and the modificationPre-Funded Warrants will equal or repeal of many business deductions and credits (including a reduction of the business tax credit for certain clinical testing expenses incurred in the testing of certain drugs for rare diseases or conditions generally referred to as “orphan drugs”). Additional changes to tax laws are likely to

continue to occur in the future. We cannot predict whether, when, in what form, or with what effective dates, tax laws, regulations and rulings may be enacted, promulgated or decided, which could result in an increase in our, or our stockholders’ tax liability or require changes in the manner in which we operate in order to minimize increases in our tax liability.

Our ability to use net operating losses and research and development credits to offset future taxable income may be subject to certain limitations.

As of December 31, 2018, we had U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of $35.5 million and $26.4 million, respectively, which begin to expire in the year 2028 and 2019 through 2027, respectively. These net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future taxable income or tax liabilities, respectively. In addition, in general, under Sections 382 and 383 of the Code , and corresponding provisions of state law, a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” is subject to limitations on its ability to utilize itspre-change net operating loss carryforwards or tax credits, or NOLs or credits, to offset future taxable income. For these purposes, an ownership change generally occurs where the aggregate stock ownership of one or more stockholders or groups of stockholders who owns at least 5% of a corporation’s stock increases its ownership by more than 50 percentage points over its lowest ownership percentage within a specified testing period. We have determined that an ownership change occurred in each of the third quarter of 2014 and the second quarter of 2015. The result of these ownership changes is that approximately $5 million of ourpre-change net operating loss carryforwards will not be available to us to offset future taxable income. In addition, if it is determined that an ownership change occurred in conjunction with our common stockexceed their public offering in February 2019, the amount of our NOLs available to offset future taxable income may be further reduced. We may undergo an ownership change in connection with this offering or in connection with future changes in our stock ownership (many of which are outside of our control), whereby our ability to utilize NOLs or credits could be further limited by Sections 382 and 383 of the Code or under corresponding provisions of state law. Furthermore, our ability to utilize our NOLs or credits is conditioned upon our attaining profitability and generating U.S. federal and state taxable income. As described above under “Risk factors— Risks Associated with Our Business,” we have incurred net losses since our inception and anticipate that we will continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future; and therefore, we do not know whether or when we will generate the U.S. federal or state taxable income necessary to utilize our NOLs or credits that are subject to limitation by Sections 382 and 383 of the Code. Under the TCJA, U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards generated after December 31, 2018 will not be subject to expiration.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Some of the statements under “Prospectus Summary,” “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Business” and elsewhere in this prospectus constitute forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar matters that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “should,” “will” and “would” or the negatives of these terms or other comparable terminology.

You should not place undue reliance on forward looking statements. The cautionary statements set forth in this prospectus, including in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere, identify important factors which you should consider in evaluating our forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things:

Although the forward-looking statements in this prospectus are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations, taking into account all information currently available to us, we cannot guarantee future transactions, results, performance, achievements or outcomes. No assurance can be made to any investor by anyone that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements will be attained, or that deviations from them will not be material and adverse. We undertake no obligation, other than as maybe be required by law, tore-issue this prospectus or otherwise make public statements updating our forward-looking statements.price.

assuming no change in the assumed combined public offering price per share of common stock and related warrant and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. The table above excludes (unless stated otherwise above):

Level II HCPCS codes to describe “microprocessor-controlled, custom fabricated upper extremity braces.” In November 2018, we announced that the CMS had published two new codes (L8701, L8702) pursuant to our application for HCPCS codes which become effective in early 2019. The assignment of uniqueL-Codes, if followed by appropriate payment terms (which are still pending), would offer greater access to the MyoPro for Medicare beneficiaries.

On June 9, 2017, we completed our initial public offering, or IPO, in which we sold 665,498 shares of common stock at an offering price of $7.50 per share. All then-outstanding shares of redeemable and convertible preferred stock converted to 2,622,187 shares of common stock at the closing of the IPO. Our shares are traded on the NYSE American under the symbol “MYO.” We received proceeds from the IPO of $4,659,000, net of selling agent commissions, but before other offering expenses of approximately $729,000. Selling agent commissions and other offering expenses have been recorded as a reduction of the proceeds received.

In a private offering concurrent with the closing of the IPO on June 9, 2017, we sold 557,216 units, or the Units, to accredited investors for cash proceeds of $2,925,385. Each Unit consists of one share of common stock and a three-year warrant to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $7.50 per share. Each Unit was sold at a price of $5.25.

On December 4, 2017, we completed afollow-on public offering, or FPO, in which we sold 4,175,000 shares of our common stock and 4,175,000 warrants to purchase shares of our common stock, at a price to the public of $2.40. The warrants are exercisable at an exercise price of $2.95 per share of common stock, and they expire on December 4, 2022. The exercise price of these warrants has been subsequently reduced to $1.40 per share in connection with our February 2019 underwritten public offering. On December 6, 2017, our underwriters on the FPO exercised in full its option to purchase 626,250 shares of common stock and accompanying warrants, at a combined price to the public of $2.40 per combination. After giving effect to the full exercise of the over-allotment option, we sold an aggregate of 4,801,250 shares of common stock and accompanying warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,801,250 shares of common stock, raising $11,523,000 before underwriting discounts and other offering expenses of $1,115,000. Subsequent to the FPO, an aggregate of 1,205,556 warrants were exercised for additional gross proceeds of $3,556,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2018. No warrants were exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

Recent Developments

Underwritten Public Offering

On February 12, 2019, we completed an underwritten public offering in which we sold 4,542,500 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $1.40. All of the shares of common stock sold were offered by us and were pursuant to a prospectus dated July 16, 2018, and a preliminary prospectus supplement dated February 7, 2019, in connection with a takedown from our shelf registration statement on FormS-3 (RegistrationNo. 333-226045) (as amended, the “Registration Statement”), which the SEC declared effective on July 16, 2018. The gross proceeds to us were approximately $6.4 million. After deducting the underwriting discount and other offering expenses, net proceeds were approximately $5.6 million.

On February 12, 2019, we issued to the underwriter a warrant, or the Underwriter Warrant, to purchase 363,400 shares of common stock. The Underwriter Warrant has an exercise price $1.75 per share and may be exercised on a cashless basis in certain circumstances specified in the Underwriter Warrant. The Underwriter Warrant is exercisable six months from the date of issuance and expires four years from the date of issuance. The Underwriter Warrant provides for adjustment in the number and price of such Underwriter Warrant (and the shares of common stock underlying such Underwriter Warrant) in the event of a recapitalization, merger or other fundamental transaction.

Shelf Registration

On July 2, 2018, we filed the Registration Statement with the SEC in relation to the registration of our common stock, preferred stock, warrants and/or units of any combination thereof , or collectively, the Securities having an aggregate price of up to $75 million, subject to the limitations of the Shelf. We simultaneously entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement with B. Riley FBR, Inc., as sales agent, to provide for the offering, issuance and sale by us of up to an aggregate amount of $15 million of our common stock from time to time in“at-the-market” offerings under the Shelf and subject to the limitations thereof. On February 7, 2019, we suspended this offering of our common stock.

Term Loan

On October 22, 2019, we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement, Senior Note and Security Agreement, or collectively, the “Term Loan with CVP. Under the Term Loan, we received gross proceeds of $3.0 million (excluding fees and expenses). Including an original issue discount, we will repay CVP $3.3 million. The Term Loan bears interest at a rate of 10% and matures 18 months from the issuance date. Monthly redemptions of up to $300,000 begin six months from the inception date, with the actual amount to be determined by CVP. CVP has granted us an option to defer up to three redemption payments. If we elect to defer any payments, we will pay CVP a fee that is the greater of (i) $35,000, or (ii) 1%, 1.25% and 1.5% of the outstanding balance for each deferral, respectively, which shall be added to the outstanding balance. The Term Loan is secured by all of our assets, excluding intellectual property. We have agreed that we will not pledge our intellectual property assets to any other party for so long as the Term Loan is outstanding. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Term Loan, we may prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance of the Term Loan, which includes accrued but unpaid interest, as well as collections and enforcement costs, transfer, stamp, issuance and similar taxes and fees incurred under the Term Loan, at any time subject to a prepayment penalty of 15% of the amount of the outstanding balance to be repaid. For so long as the Term Loan remains outstanding, we have agreed to pay CVP 50% of the outstanding balance of the Term Loan from net proceeds that we receives from the sale of our common stock or other equity (excluding sales of common stock under our at market sales agreement, dated as of July 2, 2018 with B. Riley FBR Inc.), which payments will be applied towards and reduce the outstanding balance of the Term Loan. The Term Loan also contains penalty provisions in an event of default. Events of default are categorized between minor events and major events, with penalties of 5% and 15% of the outstanding balance, respectively for each occurrence. Penalties can be incurred for up to three separate events of default, but are capped at 25% of the outstanding balance immediately prior to the first occurrence of an event of default. Events of default include (i) the failure to repay the Term Loan at maturity; (ii) the failure to make monthly redemption payments; (iii) the failure to make timely filings to the SEC; (iv) the failure to obtain CVP’s prior consent to enter into a fundamental transaction, and (v) conditions of insolvency, receivership and bankruptcy filings. After the occurrence of an event of default, interest on the Term Loan will accrue at a rate of 18% per annum, or such lesser rate as permitted under applicable law. As described in the Term Loan, upon the occurrence of certain events of default, the outstanding balance will become automatically due and payable, and upon the occurrence of other events of default, the Lender may declare the outstanding balance immediately due and payable at such time or at any time thereafter. The Term Loan includes provisions for technical covenants, but no financial covenants, and CVP has the right to consent to any additional debt financing arrangements, including convertible debt financings. In connection with the Term Loan, we paid our placement agent a commission equal to 6% of the gross proceeds of the Term Loan.

Results of Operations

We have incurred net losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception and anticipate this to continue as we focus our efforts on expanding our sales and marketing efforts to increase our customer base and expand into new markets, invest in development of our MyoPro products, the funding of clinical research studies to support our reimbursement efforts, and incur increased costs required to comply with the regulatory requirements of the SEC, as a result of our becoming a public company.

Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

The following table sets forth our revenue, cost of revenue, gross profit and gross margin for each of the periods presented.

Revenues

We derive revenue primarily from the sale of our products to O&P providers, the VA, rehabilitation hospitals, and through distributors. Recently, we have begun providing devices directly to patients and billing their insurance companies directly, while sometimes utilizing the clinical services of O&P providers for which they are paid a fee.

With the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification 606, or ASC 606, grant revenue is recognized as an offset to research and development costs. We periodically receive grants that require us to perform research activities as specified in each respective grant. We are paid based on the fees stipulated in the respective grants which approximate the projected costs to be incurred by us to perform such activities. We did not recognize any grant revenue during the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

Total revenues were similar for the three months ended September 30, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018, and increased by $763,000, or 49%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018. Revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2019 was driven by a higher average selling price, which was offset by fewer revenue units. The increase in revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was driven by an increase in revenue units, partially offset by lower average selling prices.

Gross margin

Cost of revenue consists of direct costs for the manufacturing and fabrication of our products, changes in inventory reserves, warranty costs and royalties associated with licensed technologies.

Gross margin was 68% in each of the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 and increased to 73% during the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to 68% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Gross margin during the three months ended September 30, 2019 was affected by approximately $102,000 of cost of revenues for shipments of the MyoPro to patients for which the criteria for revenue recognition had not been met, partially offset by approximately $164,000 in revenue for which cost of revenues was recorded in a prior period . These effects reduced gross margin by 11 percentage points in the three months ended September 30, 2019. The increase in gross margin during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was primarily due to cost reductions realized on the MyoPro, partially offset by the effect of the factors discussed above.

Operating expenses,

The following table sets forth our operating expenses for each of the periods presented.

Research and development

Research and development, or R&D, expenses consist of costs for our R&D personnel, including salaries, benefits, bonuses and stock-based compensation, product development costs, costs required to comply with the regulatory requirements of the FDA, the cost of certain third-party contractors and travel expense. R&D costs are expensed as they are incurred. We intend to continue to develop additional products and enhance our existing products and expect R&D costs to continue to increase on an annual basis.

R&D expenses increased by approximately $95,000, or 21%, during the three months ended September 30, 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018, and by approximately $307,000, or 23%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018. The increases were primarily due to increases in headcount and associated personnel costs, as well as product development costs associated with a new pediatric device,

Selling, general and administrative

Selling expenses consist of costs for our sales, clinical and marketing personnel, including salaries, benefits, bonuses, stock-based compensation and sales commissions, costs of digital advertising, marketing and promotional events, clinical studies, corporate communications, product marketing and travel expenses. Sales commissions are generally earned and recorded as expense when the revenue is recognized. We expect sales and marketing expenses to increase as we expand our sales and marketing efforts.

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of costs for administrative and finance personnel, including salaries, benefits, bonuses and stock-based compensation, professional fees associated with legal matters, consulting expenses, costs for pursuing insurance reimbursements for our products, and costs required to comply with the regulatory requirements of the SEC, as well as costs associated with accounting systems, insurance premiums and other corporate expenses. We expect that general and administrative expenses will increase as we pursue an increased number of insurance reimbursements and seek expanded payor coverage for our products and add administrative and accounting support structure for our growing business.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately $18,000, or 1%, during the three months ended September 30, 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018, and increased by approximately $757,000, or 10%, during the nine months ended September 30, 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018. The increases were primarily due to increases in headcount and associated personnel costs, particularly associated with reimbursement activities.

Interest and other expense (income)

The following table sets forth our interest and other expense (income) for each of the periods presented.

The increases in the gain from the change in fair value of derivative liabilities during each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 is primarily due to the decreases in the fair value of the derivative liabilities for the warrants issued to our selling agents for our public offerings in February 2019 and December 2017. The decreases in fair value of our derivative liabilities are primarily due to the decline in our stock price during these time periods.

The decreases in interest and other expense (income) were due primarily to lower interest income due to lower cash balances.

Adjusted EBITDA

We believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, a financial measure that is not part of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP, provides investors with additional information about our financial results. Adjusted EBITDA is an important supplemental measure used by our board of directors and management to evaluate our operating performance fromperiod-to-period on a consistent basis and as a measure for planning and forecasting overall expectations and for evaluating actual results against such expectations.

We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest and other income (expense), taxes, depreciation and amortization adjusted for, stock-based compensation and the impact of the fair value revaluation of our derivative liabilities.

Adjusted EBITDA is not in accordance with, or an alternative to, measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In addition, thisnon-GAAP measure is not based on any comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles. As anon-GAAP measure, Adjusted EBITDA has limitations in that it does not reflect all of the amounts associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In particular:

Because of these limitations, you should consider Adjusted EBITDA alongside other financial performance measures including net income (loss) and our financial results presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

The following table provides a reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA for each of the periods indicated:

Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

The following table sets forth our revenue, cost of revenue, gross profit and gross margin for each of the years presented.

Revenues

Total revenue increased by $885,000, or 57%. Product revenue increased by $939,000, due to a significantly higher average selling price, offset by a $54,000 decrease in grant revenue. Product sales of $2,380,000 include $363,000 in direct sales to patients and reflect a $423,000 decrease in product sales to distributors primarily to Ottobock. There were no product sales made to Ottobock in the year ended December 31, 2018.

Grant revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018, was $65,000 compared with $118,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017. We expect that grant revenue will continue to decline in future periods as we complete our research activities associated with the grants.

Gross margin

Gross margin increased to 70% for the year ended December 31, 2018, as compared to 68% in the comparable 2017 period due to a significantly higher average selling price per unit offset by an increase in inventory and warranty provisions.

We expect our product gross margins to vary depending on amounts of reimbursements from third party payors and related average selling price, as well as mix of product and sales channels.

Operating expenses

The following table sets forth our operating expenses for each of the years presented.

Research and development

R&D expenses increased by $87,000, or 5%. The increase was primarily due to an increase in personnel costs of $239,000, related to additional engineering personnel costs and an increase in share-based compensation. The increase in personnel costs were offset by a decrease in bonus compensation. In 2017 we awarded a special incentive bonus of $300,000 to an engineering executive.

Selling, general and administrative

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $4,556,000 or 78%. The increase was primarily due to increases in personnel costs of $2,451,000, professional services of $735,000, marketing expenses of $482,000, facilities costs of $422,000, and an increase in share-based compensation expense of $440,000. Personnel costs increased primarily as a result of adding headcount to support, sales, marketing and reimbursement efforts. This has the effect of increasing share-based compensation expenses as well. Professional and consulting fees increased reflecting a full year of being a public company and other costs supporting our reimbursement efforts. Marketing expenses increased by primarily for lead generation, public relations and trade shows. Facilities costs increased due to insurance, rent and office expenses.

Other expense (income)

The following table sets forth our interest and other expense (income) for each of the years presented.

The loss on early extinguishment of debt of $135,000 in 2017 reflects the payoff of 50% of our notes payable, shareholder balance including accrued but unpaid interest through the issuance of our shares at a 20% discount.

The change in the fair value of derivative liabilities of $81,000 is due to recording a derivative liability relating to warrants issued during the year ended December 31, 2017 and subsequentmark-to-market adjustments of our derivative liabilities primarily due to the decline in stock price during the year ended December 31, 2018.

The debt discount on convertible notes in 2017 resulted from the closing of our IPO, as the measurement of the value of the previously contingent embedded beneficial conversion option was now determinable and we were required under GAAP to recognize the value of the embedded beneficial conversion features and the warrants issued with the notes as a charge to interest expense. Because the combined relative fair value of the warrants and

the value of the beneficial conversion feature exceeded the principal value of the convertible promissory notes, we recorded an immediate charge to interest expense for the debt discount in the statement of operations on June 9, 2017, our IPO closing date, equal to the $5,172,000 principal value of the notes. We did not hold debt during the year ended December 31, 2018.

The increase in interest and other expense of $534,000, net is primarily due to an increase in interest income due on cash held in our money market account due to the cash proceeds raised from our 2017 IPO.

Adjusted EBITDA

We define Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest and other income (expense), taxes, depreciation and amortization adjusted for, stock-based compensation, the debt discount on convertible notes and the impact of the fair value revaluation of our derivative liabilities.

Adjusted EBITDA is not in accordance with, or an alternative to, measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In addition, thisnon-GAAP measure is not based on any comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles. As anon-GAAP measure, Adjusted EBITDA has limitations in that it does not reflect all of the amounts associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In particular:

Because of these limitations, you should consider Adjusted EBITDA alongside other financial performance measures including net income (loss) and our financial results presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

The following table provides a reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA for each of the years indicated:

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity

We measure our liquidity in a number of ways, including the following:

We had working capital and stockholders’ equity of approximately $4,041,000 and $4,419,000, respectively, at September 30, 2019. We used approximately $7,700,000 in cash for operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. On October 22, 2019, we entered into a Term Loan with CVP. Under the Term Loan, we received gross proceeds of $3.0 million (excluding fees and expenses). Including an original issue discount, we will repay CVP $3.3 million. The Term Loan bears interest at a rate of 10% and matures 18 months from the issuance date. Monthly redemptions of up to $300,000 begin six months from the inception date, with the actual amount to be determined by CVP. CVP has granted us an option to defer up to three redemption payments. If we elect to defer any payments, we will pay CVP a fee that is the greater of $35,000, or 1%, 1.25% and 1.5% of the outstanding balance for each deferral, respectively, which shall be added to the outstanding balance. The Term Loan is secured by all of our assets, excluding intellectual property. We have agreed that we will not pledge our intellectual property assets to any other party for so long as the Term Loan is outstanding. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Term Loan, we may prepay all or any portion of the outstanding balance of the Term Loan, which includes accrued but unpaid interest, as well as collections and enforcement costs, transfer, stamp, issuance and similar taxes and fees incurred under the Term Loan, at any time subject to a prepayment penalty of 15% of the amount of the outstanding balance to be repaid. For so long as the Term Loan remains outstanding, we have agreed to pay CVP 50% of the outstanding balance of the Term Loan from net proceeds that we receive from the sale of our common stock or other equity (excluding sales of common stock under our at market sales agreement, dated as of July 2, 2018 with B. Riley FBR Inc.), which payments will be applied towards and reduce the outstanding balance of the Term Loan. The Term Loan also contains penalty provisions in an event of default. Events of default are categorized between minor events and major events, with penalties of 5% and 15% of the outstanding balance, respectively for each occurrence. Penalties can be incurred for up to three separate events of default, but are capped at 25% of the outstanding balance immediately prior to the first occurrence of an event of default. Events of default include (i) the failure to repay the Term Loan at maturity; (ii) the failure to make monthly redemption payments; (iii) the failure to make timely filings to the SEC; (iv) the failure to obtain CVP’s prior consent to enter into a fundamental transaction, and (v) conditions of insolvency, receivership and bankruptcy filings. After the occurrence of an event of default, interest on the Term Loan will accrue at a rate of 18% per annum, or such lesser rate as permitted under applicable law. As described in the Term Loan, upon the occurrence of certain events of default, the outstanding balance will become automatically due and payable, and upon the occurrence of other events of default, CVP may declare the outstanding balance immediately due and payable at such time or at any time thereafter. The Term Loan includes provisions for technical covenants, but no financial covenants, and the Lender has the right to consent to any additional debt financing arrangements, including convertible debt financings. In connection with the Term Loan, we paid our placement agent a commission equal to 6% of the gross proceeds of the Term Loan.

In light of our cash burn rate, we, believe that our available cash and cash equivalents as of September 30, 2019 raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the accompanying financial statements are issued. Based upon our working capital, the net proceeds from the Term Loan and projected continued operating losses, we expect that the cash we currently have available will fund our operations into the second quarter of 2020. Thereafter, we will need to raise further capital, through the sale of additional equity or debt securities, to support our future operations and to further execute our business plan. Our operating needs include costs to operate our business, including amounts required to fund working capital and

capital expenditures. Our future capital requirements and the adequacy of our available funds will depend on many factors, including our ability to successfully increase sales of our products and services, competing technological and market developments, and the need to enter into collaborations with other companies or acquire other companies or technologies to enhance or complement our product and service offerings.

Our plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern are primarily focused on raising additional capital in order to meet our obligations and execute our business plan by pursuing our product development initiatives and penetrating markets for the sale of our products. We believe that we have access to capital resources through possible public or private equity offerings, exercises of outstanding warrants, debt financings (with the consent of CVP), or other means; however, we may be unable to raise sufficient additional capital when we need it or raise capital on favorable terms. Debt financing may require us to pledge certain assets and enter into covenants that could restrict certain business activities or our ability to incur further indebtedness; and may contain other terms that are not favorable to our stockholders or us. If we are unable to obtain adequate funds on reasonable terms, we may be required to significantly curtail or discontinue operations or obtain funds by entering into financing agreements on unattractive terms. There can be no assurance we will be successful in implementing our plans to alleviate substantial doubt.

Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018

Operating Activities. The net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was primarily used to fund a net loss of approximately $7,952,000, adjusted fornon-cash expenses in the aggregate amount of $672,000, and by approximately $418,000 of cash used by net changes in the levels of operating assets and liabilities, primarily related to increases in inventories, and prepaid expenses and other current assets and decreases in our accounts payable, partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable.

The net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was primarily used to fund a net loss of approximately $7,625,000, adjusted fornon-cash expenses in the aggregate amount of approximately $671,000, and by approximately $139,000 of cash used by changes in the levels of operating assets and liabilities, primarily related to increases in accounts receivable, inventories and prepaid expenses and other current assets, offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

Investing Activities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, our cash used in investing activities was for the purchase of equipment.

Financing Activities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, cash provided by financing activities of approximately $5,520,000 was primarily due to $5,604,000 of net proceeds received from our underwritten public offering in February 2019.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, cash provided by financing activities of $3,368,000 was primarily due to $3,556,000 of proceeds received for the exercise of warrants.

Cash flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017

Operating Activities. The net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 was primarily used to fund a net loss of $10,317,000, adjusted fornon-cash expenses in the aggregate amount of $897,000 of which $814,000 ofnon-cash adjustments related to stock-based compensation, and by $187,000 of cash used for changes in operating assets and liabilities, primarily related to decreases in accounts receivable, inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets, and deferred revenue which was partially offset by increases in our accounts payable and other accrued expenses and other current liabilities.

The net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 was primarily used to fund a net loss of $12,097,000, adjusted fornon-cash expenses in the aggregate amount of $5,438,000, of which $5,055,000 ofnon-cash adjustments related to fair value adjustments of warrants and derivative liabilities, and by $506,000 of cash provided by changes in the levels of operating assets and liabilities, primarily related to increases in accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued interest partially offset by increases in our accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets and payments of deferred offering costs.

Investing Activities. During the year ended December 31, 2018 our cash used in investing activities of $127,000 was for the acquisition of equipment.

During the year ended December 31, 2017 our cash used in investing activities of $67,000 was for the acquisition of equipment.

Financing Activities. During the year ended December 31, 2018 cash provided by financing activities of $3,338,000 was primarily due to $3,556,000 of proceeds received for the exercise of warrants. The increase was partially offset by $74,000 for employee statutory withholding taxes paid with the net settlement of vested restricted stock and $145,000 for payments of issuance costs.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we completed our initial public offering generating $4,368,000 in net proceeds, excluding $438,000 of offering expenses incurred in 2016, and closed our concurrent private placement generating $2,923,000 in net proceeds. We also completed a secondary offering in December 2017 generating $10,408,000 in net proceeds. In addition, $1,770,000 of cash, was generated from our convertible note $2,977,000 of cash was provided from debt financings, partially offset by $21,000 paid for issuance costs.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have anyoff-balance sheet arrangements and did not have any such arrangements in the nine months ended September 30, 2019, or for the years ended December 31, 2018, or 2017.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. These estimates and assumptions are reviewed

on anon-going basis and updated as appropriate. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Our significant estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts, the valuation of our deferred tax asset, the fair value of our derivative liabilities and reserves for slow-moving and consigned inventory.

Accounts Receivable

We carry accounts receivable at invoiced amounts less an allowance for doubtful accounts. We evaluate our accounts receivable on a continuous basis, and if necessary, establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based on a number of factors, including current credit conditions and customer payment history. We do not require collateral or accrue interest on accounts receivable and credit terms are generally 30 days.

Inventories

Inventories are recorded at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using a specific identification method. We reduce the carrying value of inventory for those items that are potentially excess, obsolete or slow-moving based on changes in customer demand, technology developments or other economic factors. In addition, the carrying value of consigned inventories is reduced by the value of MyoPro devices that will not be sold based on historical experience

Deferred Offering Costs

Deferred offering costs are comprised of direct incremental legal, accounting and financial advisor fees related relating to capital raising efforts. Deferred offering costs are offset against proceeds of an offering. In the event a capital raising effort is terminated, deferred offering costs will be expensed.

Research and Development Costs

We expense research and development costs as incurred. Research and development costs primarily consist of salaries and benefits, facility and overhead costs, and outsourced research activities.

Revenue Recognition

On January 1, 2019, we adopted the new accounting standard ASC 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” and all the related amendments using the modified retrospective method for all contracts not completed as of the date of adoption. For contracts that were modified before the effective date, we reflected the aggregate effect of all modifications when identifying performance obligations and allocating transaction price in accordance with practical expedient ASC606-10-65-1-(f)-4, which did not have a material effect on our assessment of the cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption. We recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the new standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The comparative information has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2019 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under ASC 605.

Revenues under ASC 606 are required to be recognized either at a “point in time” or “over time,” depending on the facts and circumstances of the arrangement, and are evaluated using a five-step model. The adoption of ASC 606 did not have a material impact on the financial statements at initial implementation. Depending on the timing of product deliveries to customers, which is when cost of revenue must be recorded, and when the Company meets the criteria to record revenue, there may be fluctuations in gross margin on an ongoing basis.

We recognize revenue after applying the following five steps:

Revenue is recognized when control of these services is transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those services.

In certain cases, we ship the MyoPro device to O&P providers or directly to patients pending reimbursement from third party payors. As a result of these arrangements, elements of the revenue recognition criteria have not been met upon shipment of the MyoPro. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, we recognized revenue of approximately $164,000 from O&P providers or third-party payors for which costs related to the completion of our performance obligations were recorded in a prior period.

We periodically receive federally-funded grants that requires us to perform research activities as specified in each respective grant. We are paid based on the fees stipulated in the respective grants which approximate the projected costs to be incurred by us to perform such activities. As required under Topic 606, grant proceeds are now booked as a reduction in R&D expenses. We adopted the accounting standard on a modified retrospective method, and the prior comparative 2018 grant revenue has not been restated for presentation purposes. Grant revenue was previously recognized when persuasive evidence of the arrangement existed, the service had been provided and adherence to specific parameters of the awarded grant were met, the amount was fixed and determinable and collection was reasonably assured. We recognized the revenue on a completion of performance basis where no ongoing obligation existed, or ratably over the term if the grant of no specific performance was required. Direct costs related to these grants were reported as a component of research and development costs in the statements of operations except for reimbursable costs which were reported as a component of cost of revenue in the statements of operations.

We recognized approximately $10,100 and $19,100 of grant income in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. Direct costs related to these grants are reported as a component of research and development costs in the statements of operations except for reimbursable costs which are reported as a component of cost of revenue in the statements of operations.

Shipping and handling activities are not considered a contract performance obligation. We record shipping and handling costs billed to customers as revenue with offsetting costs recorded as cost of revenue.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes under Accounting Standards Codification 740 Income Taxes, or ASC 740. Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and net operating loss and credit carryforwards using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to impact taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.

ASC 740 also clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.

Tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return are recorded in our financial statements. A tax benefit from an uncertain tax position is only recognized if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be

sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. Uncertain tax positions have had no impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Stock-Based Compensation

We account for stock awards to employees by measuring the cost of services received in exchange for the award of equity instruments based upon the fair value of the award on the date of grant. The fair value of that award is then ratably recognized as expense over the period during which the recipient is required to provide services in exchange for that award.

Options and warrants granted to consultants and othernon-employees are recorded at fair value as of the grant date and subsequently adjusted to fair value at the end of each reporting period until such options and warrants vest, and the fair value of such instruments, as adjusted, is expensed over the related vesting period.

Net Loss per Share

Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, plus potentially dilutive common shares. Convertible debt, preferred stock, restricted stock units, stock options and warrants are excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation when their impact is antidilutive. We reported a net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, and as a result, all potentially dilutive common shares are considered antidilutive for these periods.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU,No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”, or ASU2016-02. ASU2016-02 requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases. ASU2016-02 will also require new qualitative and quantitative disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating ASU2016-02 and its impact on its financial statements. As an emerging growth company, we will delay adoption of ASU2016-02 until January 1, 2020.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2018-07, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting”, or Topic 718. The ASU expands the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. The ASU also clarifies that Topic 718 does not apply to share-based payments used to effectively provide (1) financing to the issuer or (2) awards granted in conjunction with selling goods or services to customers as part of a contract accounted for under Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year. We have adopted this standard and the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial statements or disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.” The ASU requires application of the prospective method of transition (for only the most recent interim or annual period presented in the initial fiscal year of adoption) to the new disclosure requirements for (1) changes in unrealized gains and

losses included in OCI and (2) the range and weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements. The ASU also requires prospective application to any modifications to disclosures made because of the change to the requirements for the narrative description of measurement uncertainty. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that fiscal year. We are currently evaluating the accounting, transition, and disclosure requirements of the standard to determine the impact, if any, on our financial statements.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Our unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, totaling approximately $4.3 million as of September 30, 2019, was deposited in bank accounts. The cash in these accounts is held for working capital purposes and invested by the bank in overnight money market funds that invest in short-term government or government backed securities. Our primary objective is to preserve our capital for purposes of funding our operations.

JOBS Act

In April 2012, the JOBS Act, was enacted. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards until those standards. Thus, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to avail ourselves of this provision of the JOBS Act.

BUSINESS

Overview

We are a wearable medical robotics company that offers functional improvement for those with neuromuscular disorders and upper limb paralysis. We develop and market the MyoPro product line. A MyoPro is a myoelectric-controlled upper limb brace, or orthosis. The orthosis is a rigid brace used for the purpose of supporting a patient’s weak or paralyzed arm to enable and help improve functional activities of daily living, or ADLs, in the home and community. It is custom-fabricated by trained professionals during a custom fabrication process for each individual user to meet their specific needs. Our products are designed to help improve function in adults and adolescents with neuromuscular conditions due to brachial plexus injury, stroke, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury and other neurological disorders. We sell our products through various sales channels, including through orthotics and prosthetics, or O&P providers, the Veterans Administration, or VA, to our distributors in certain accounts and geographic markets and directly to patients. When we provide devices directly to patients and bill their insurance companies directly, we may deliver the MyoPro devices by our own clinical staff or utilize the clinical consulting services of O&P professionals for which they are paid a fee.

Our goal is to address the need to help restore function to individuals who have suffered partial paralysis and can no longer support or move their arm or hand despite the best efforts of surgeons and rehabilitation therapists.

Our solution, the MyoPro custom fabricated limb orthosis, is for the upper limbs. The concept was originally pioneered in the 1960s, refined in the labs of MIT, and made commercially feasible through our efforts. Partial paralysis is severe muscle weakness or loss of voluntary movement in one or more parts of the body. The MyoPro is listed in the United States with the FDA as a Class II (510(k)-exempt) device (Biofeedback Device). We believe it is the only current device able to help neuromuscular-impaired people restore function in weak arms and hands using their own muscle signals. The device consists of a portable arm brace made of a lightweight aerospace metal and includes advanced signal processing software,non-invasive sensors, small motors, and a lightweight battery unit. The product is worn to support the dysfunctional joint and as a functional aid for reaching and grasping, and has also been shown to have therapeutic benefits for some users to increase motor control.

The MyoPro’s control technology utilizes an advancednon-invasive human-machine interface based onnon-invasive, patented electromyography, or EMG, control technology that continuously monitors and senses, but does not stimulate, the affected muscles. The patient self-initiates movement through his or her weakened muscle signals that indicate the intention to move. In addition to supporting the weakened limb, the MyoPro functions as a neuro-muscular prosthetic by helping restore function to the impaired limb similarly to a myoelectric prosthetic for an amputee. It is prescribed by physicians and provided by trained clinical professionals as a custom-fabricated myoelectric elbow-wrist-hand orthosis.

In addition to stroke patients, we believe our technology may be used to improve upper extremity movement in patients with peripheral nerve injury, spinal cord injury, cerebral palsy, traumatic brain injury, and other neurological disorders, depending on the individual patient’s condition.

Our strategy is to establish ourselves as the market leader in myoelectric limb orthotics, and to build a set of products, software applications, and value-added services based upon our patented technology platform. While we currently focus on upper extremity orthotics, our future products may include devices for the shoulder, leg, knee, and ankle, sized for adults, adolescents and children, along withnon-medical applications for industrial and military markets. We expect to introduce our MyPro device for pediatric use in calendar year 2020.

We estimate that the addressable market in the United States for products directed all individuals with upper extremity paralysis, such as our MyoPro, may total $10 billion, based on 3 million existing cases of upper extremity paralysis and our estimate that up to 25% of such individuals may be medically qualified candidates

for a MyoPro. In addition, based on an estimated 350,000 new incidences each year in the United States, we believe this market is expected to grow by $1.2 billion per year. Using similar estimates for countries outside of the United States, we believe that the total worldwide market potential for products addressing upper extremity paralysis may reach $30 billion over time.

To assess whether an individual is a medically-qualified candidate for a MyoPro, we and our distribution partners utilize a variety of techniques to evaluate patients, including tele-health video conference sessions,in-person screening days at various locations, and evaluations at clinical facilities where therapists and physicians refer patients for a MyoPro, which requires a physician’s prescription to be reimbursed by insurance. We use online marketing to educate individuals about the MyoPro solution for their impaired limbs, and also receive referrals of candidates from O&P providers and hospitals such as the Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, and VA Medical Centers. As a result of these efforts, as of September 30, 2019 we have a total of 528 patients in our reimbursement pipeline, a growth rate of nearly six times since June 30, 2018.

In most cases, private health insurance companies pay for the MyoPro device, either to us directly or to an O&P provider depending on the patient’s insurance plan. If we are serving the patient directly, then we bill the payor, and if an O&P provider is responsible for delivering the MyoPro to the patient, then we sell the custom-fabricated MyoPro device to the O&P provider at a wholesale price, to which they add their clinical services. In November 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, issued two new codes for the MyoPro, L8701 and L8702, and we expect decisions relating to coverage policy determination and reimbursement amounts for our MyoPro products from CMS sometime in 2020, which may offer greater access to the MyoPro for Medicare beneficiaries. CMS has classified our devices as a DME rental, which is typically paid as a monthly rental fee for up to 13 months under a capped rental program. This payment approach differs from thelump-sum payments currently received from by commercial payers, VA hospitals, worker’s compensation, and state Medicaid plans. While expect decisions from CMS sometime in 2020, there is no timetable specified by CMS for such decisions, nor is there any guarantee that any such decisions will actually increase access. In addition, we cannot predict the impact of any such decision on the amounts that we may be reimbursed by private insurance companies, if any.

We are the exclusive licensee of 2 U.S. patents for the myoelectric limb orthosis device based on technology originally developed at MIT in collaboration with medical experts affiliated with Harvard Medical School. We also hold 11 issued patents in the U.S. and various countries and have multiple pending patent applications in the US and international markets. Our intellectual property also consists of trade secrets related to myoelectric control software and mechanical designs from over ten years of R&D and product development activity.

We are headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Market Opportunity: Common Causes of Arm Paralysis

Stroke

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the CDC, stroke is the leading cause of disability in the U.S. affecting 800,000 people per year. We have working relationships with rehabilitation facilities in the U.S., including the Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Kennedy Krieger Institute, and numerous VA Medical Centers, and we have developed an appropriate set of inclusion criteria to determine which persons that are affected by stroke would be medically qualified for the intervention.

A growing diagnosis in the U.S. is the occurrence of stroke in those under the age of 65. Nationally, 34% of stroke survivors are under 65. The challenges for these younger survivors include the need to return to work, child rearing, and community activities that may not exist for older individuals. We believe that this is an important market segment because of their greater need to return to normal activity, and because they are more likely to have their devices reimbursed by insurance providers.

Vehicular and Workplace Accidents

One of the most straightforward applications for the MyoPro is to support the weak arm and help restore arm function to individuals who have suffered peripheral nerve injuries. A common outcome of vehicular and workplace accidents is damage to the nerves in the shoulder known as the brachial plexus. Many individuals recover from their related trauma with the exception of the ability to control their elbow and in some cases their hand. Nerve transfer surgery is often a solution; however, these procedures are not always restorative. In some cases, patients undergo amputation and receive myoelectric prosthetics rather than deal with a paralyzed arm. One of the leading medical facilities in the U.S. for treating brachial plexus injuries is the Mayo Clinic. We have been working with surgeons at the Mayo Clinic who have incorporated the MyoPro into their surgical post-operative treatment protocol to help improve function in upper limbs.

Spinal Cord Injuries

According to the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation, spinal cord injuries are the cause of 23% of all paralysis. The level of paralysis depends on where the injury occurs. Currently, medically qualified individuals for a MyoPro include those with sufficient remaining EMG signal strength to initiate movement of the devices, as determined by the clinician using a MyoPro demonstration unit.

Cerebral Palsy

Based on data provided by the CDC, the prevalence of cerebral palsy, or CP, in the United States is approximately 74,000 for children ages6-12 years old. CP is caused by brain injury or brain malformation that occurs before, during, or immediately after birth while the infant’s brain is under development.

Birth Brachial Plexus Injuries

During birth, some newborns suffer an injury to the brachial plexus nerve, which can result in arm paralysis. We have been testing our planned pediatric device on children who have suffered this nerve damage to assess its ability to improve function in upper limbs, and expect that this new version of the MyoPro, the MyoPal, will be available to these patients in 2020.

Progressive Conditions

The MyoPro has been prescribed in a few cases for individuals with progressive conditions such as multiple sclerosis and ALS. For individuals with these conditions, the MyoPro is used for functional improvement that may help provide strength conservation and help to extend the time they can maintain independence. As users continue to progress with their condition, settings can be adjusted to provide increasing amounts of assistance.

Arm Paralysis Solutions & Treatments

The standard of care for treating paralysis varies by diagnosis. In the case of neurological injuries such as stroke, occupational / physical therapy is the standard of care. Each year, stroke and other survivors undergo months of rehabilitation. Unfortunately, many are left with long term hemiparesis, which is weakness on one side of the body. Interventions such as electrical stimulation, static braces, and continued therapy are available, and yet the prevalence of chronic upper limb paralysis is in the millions.

Our Solutions

Although commercial products for powered prosthetics have been available since the 1970s, we believe that powered orthotics have been held back by issues related to weight, comfort, and the technological capability of microprocessors and software. The MyoPro is known in the medical community as a custom fabricated limb orthosis. It is created individually for each patient from a cast, just like a prosthetic, except for someone who still has a limb but that isnon-functional.

Orthotic devices are provided by clinical professionals who custom fabricate and fit these devices. According to the American Orthotics and Prosthetics Association, in 2018, there were approximately 4,000 O&P facilities located both separate from and within hospitals in the U.S. Additionally, the VA has been a pioneer in O&P. In fact, the design of the MyoPro Motion G powered grasp product is rooted in research conducted at the Boston-area VA in the 1990s. This research demonstrated that it is technically feasible to design a myoelectric elbow-hand orthosis; however, we believe that the product was not commercially practical until we were able to incorporate recent technological developments such as improved microprocessors and software, lightweight materials and motors, and smaller batteries to create an acceptable orthosis for users.

The MyoPro can enable individuals to self-initiate and control movements of a partially paralyzed or weakened limb using their own muscle signals. When the user tries to move, our patented EMG control system uses sensors to detect the weak muscle signal, and then activates a motor to move the limb in the desired direction. The user is in control of their own limb; the brace amplifies their weak muscle signal to restore function to the affected joint. Importantly, theEMG-driven device requires that users are actively engaged throughout the movement; if they stop trying to move, the device stops. With our product, a paralyzed individual, such as one who has suffered a brachial plexus injury, stroke or other neuromuscular disorder can experience improved function in performing ADLs including feeding, reaching and lifting.

To qualify for a MyoPro, candidates must meet a comprehensive set of requirements determined by a trained clinical professional during anin-person evaluation. These criteria include long term partial paralysis, detection of a muscle signal sufficient to control the device, demonstrated cognitive abilities, and lack of other conditions that might limit the effectiveness or safety of the device such as use of certain pharmaceuticals, high levels of pain, or limits to range of motion, as well as falling within measurement limitations for the arm and hand to be able to fit into the device. Finally, candidates must have meaningful and achievable functional goals that can realistically be accomplished with the device that cannot otherwise be achieved with a less costly intervention such as additional rehabilitation therapy.

Each MyoPro brace is custom fabricated to the patient by for optimum mobility and performance. During the evaluation process, our clinical staff or Myomo-trained orthotists or prosthetists will qualify an individual for a MyoPro through a physical assessment. Should the individual qualify, we (in the case of direct billing) or the O&P provider will determine whether the device is covered by the individual’s health insurance. If coverage is approved and the individual is a suitable candidate for MyoPro, then the fabrication and fitting process is undertaken:

In a cost-conscious healthcare environment, we believe that there are two compelling uses for the MyoPro. The first is to enable users functional improvement that can help them to return to work, The second key application is helping improve function for individuals who have difficulty performing ADLs to remain at home. In the U.S., 5% of community residents require daily help with ADLs and consume 23% of all healthcare spending. We believe that helping restore upper limb function to these individuals may result in fewer emergency room visits related to falls, increase their level of activity, and avoid the need for institutionalization. With 70 million baby boomers headed into their retirement years, we believe that it is vital to keep beneficiaries in the lowest cost of care setting — the home.

Healthcare and Privacy Laws and Regulation

We are subject to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations. Manufacturing, sales, promotion and other activities following product approval are also subject to regulation by numerous regulatory authorities in the United States in addition to the FDA, CMS, the Office of Inspector General and Office for Civil Rights, other divisions of the Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, the Department of Justice, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, the Occupational Safety & Health Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency and state and local governments.

Additionally, healthcare providers and third-party payors play a primary role in the recommendation of medical devices and other medical items and services. Arrangements with providers, consultants, third-party payors and customers are subject to broadly applicable fraud and abuse, anti-kickback, false claims laws, reporting of payments to physicians and teaching hospitals and patient privacy laws and regulations and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain our business and/or financial arrangements. Restrictions under applicable federal and state healthcare and privacy laws and regulations, include the following:

Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors available, it is possible that some of our business activities, including compensation of physicians with stock or stock options , could, despite efforts to comply, be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. Moreover, efforts to ensure that our business arrangements will comply with applicable healthcare laws may involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental and enforcement authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law interpreting applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our

business, including the imposition of significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, disgorgement, monetary fines, exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs, integrity and oversight agreements to resolve allegations ofnon-compliance, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, and curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our results of operations. In addition, the commercialization of any of our product candidates outside the United States will also likely subject us to foreign equivalents of the healthcare laws mentioned above, among other foreign laws.

Health Insurance Reimbursement

In the United States and markets in other countries, patients who are prescribed medical devices for their conditions and providers performing the prescribed services generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the associated healthcare costs. MyoPro devices are typically reimbursed by the patient’s health insurance plan, which include government health programs in the United States such a Medicare and Medicaid, commercial health insurers and managed care organizations. To obtain approval for reimbursement, payors require a physician’s written order, a history of the patient’s medical condition and past treatment, and demonstration of medical necessity. Our Patient Advocacy Team assists patients and O&P providers in developing and submitting this documentation for coverage of the prescribed MyoPro. Since the MyoPro is a relatively new device, payors may not be familiar with the device, and in some cases, deem it to be experimental or investigational. National and regional commercial plans, worker’s compensation programs, auto insurance carriers, Medicare Advantage plans, and some state Medicaid plans have paid for the MyoPro orthosis. The process usually requires obtaining apre-authorization of the MyoPro for the patient, and if it is initially denied by the payor, we support the patient and O&P provider in appealing the decision. We have been successful in obtaining coverage for the MyoPro on a case by case basis and we continue to follow up on other cases in our reimbursement pipeline which are pending an insurance decision.

As of January 1, 2019, two new HCPCS codes for the MyoPro, L8701 and L8702, issued by CMS, went into effect. CMS elected to classify the MyoPro for Medicare beneficiaries as Durable Medical Equipment (DME) to be provided to patients under a capped rental payment system, where providers are paid monthly over a period of thirteen months. We are continuing to work with CMS on publishing reimbursement guidelines for our product. While those discussions continue, initial claims will be submitted by an O&P provider for Medicare patients to the Durable Medical Equipment Medicare Administrative Contractors, or DME MAC’s. We expect decisions relating to coverage policy determination and reimbursement amounts for our MyoPro products from CMS sometime in 2020, which may offer greater access to the MyoPro for Medicare beneficiaries. However, there is no specified timetable for such a CMS decision, nor is there any guarantee that any such decisions will actually increase access. In addition, we cannot predict the impact of any such decision on the amounts that we may be reimbursed by private insurance companies, if any.

There is no guarantee that the future level of reimbursement payments for the MyoPro directly to us or to our O&P distributors will be sufficient to cover the cost of the MyoPro device, the clinical services to evaluate and fit patients, and the other support services associated with provisioning of products to patients. Reimbursement levels may affect the number of O&P providers who wish to supply the MyoPro and may limit patient access to the technology depending on the policies of their health insurance plans.

Current and Future Legislation

The United States and many foreign jurisdictions have enacted or proposed legislative and regulatory changes affecting the healthcare system that could affect our ability to profitably sell MyoPro. Changes in regulations, statutes or the interpretation of existing regulations could impact our business in the future by requiring, for example: (i) changes to our manufacturing arrangements; (ii) additions or modifications to product labeling; (iii) the recall or discontinuation of our products; or (iv) additional record-keeping requirements. If any such changes were to be imposed, they could adversely affect the operation of our business.

In the United States, there have been and continue to be a number of legislative initiatives and judicial challenges to contain healthcare costs. For example, in March 2010, the ACA was passed, which substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both governmental and private insurers, and significantly impacted the United States medical device industry to which we sell our products. Among other things, the ACA:

On January 20, 2017, President Trump signed an Executive Order directing federal agencies with authorities and responsibilities under the ACA to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision of the ACA that would impose a fiscal burden on states or a cost, fee, tax, penalty or regulatory burden on individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals or medical devices. On October 13, 2017, President Trump signed an Executive Order terminating the cost-sharing subsidies that reimburse insurers under the ACA. The Trump administration has concluded that cost-sharing reduction, or CSR, payments to insurance companies required under the ACA have not received necessary appropriations from Congress and announced that it will discontinue these payments immediately until those appropriations are made. The loss of the CSR payments is expected to increase premiums on certain policies issued by qualified health plans under the ACA. Several state Attorneys General filed suit to stop the administration from terminating the subsidies, but their request for a restraining order was denied by a federal judge in California on October 25, 2017. On June 14, 2018, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the federal government was not required to pay more than $12 billion in ACA risk corridor payments to third-party payors who argued were owed to them. The effects of this gap in reimbursement on third-party payors, the viability of the ACA marketplace, providers, and potentially our business, are not yet known.

Moreover, on January 22, 2018, President Trump signed a continuing resolution on appropriations for fiscal year 2018 that delayed the implementation of certainACA-mandated fees, including the so called “Cadillac” tax on certain high cost employer-sponsored insurance plans, the annual fee imposed on certain health insurance providers based on market share, and the medical device excise tax onnon-exempt medical devices. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, also amended the ACA, effective January 1, 2019, by increasing thepoint-of-sale discount that is owed by pharmaceutical manufacturers who participate in Medicare Part D and closing the coverage gap in most Medicare drug plans, commonly referred to as the “donut hole.” In July 2018, CMS published a final rule permitting further collections and payments to and from certain ACA qualified health plans and health insurance issuers under the ACA risk adjustment program in response to the outcome of federal district court litigation regarding the method CMS uses to determine this risk adjustment. In addition, CMS has recently published a final rule that would give states greater flexibility, starting in 2020, in setting benchmarks for insurers in the individual and small group marketplaces, which may have the effect of relaxing the essential health benefits required under the ACA for plans sold through such marketplaces.

In addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the ACA was enacted. In August 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011, among other things, resulted in aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, which went into effect in 2013, and, due to subsequent

legislative amendments, will remain in effect through 2029 unless additional Congressional action is taken. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 further reduced Medicare payments to several types of providers, including hospitals and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years.

In response to perceived increases in healthcare costs in recent years, there have been and continue to be proposals by the Presidential administrations, members of Congress, state governments, regulators and third-party payors to control these costs and, more generally, to reform the United States healthcare system, including by repealing or replacing the ACA. Health care reform imposed a Medical Device Excise Tax, or the MDET on medical device manufacturers through the end of 2015. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, enacted in December 2015, included atwo-year moratorium on MDET such that medical device sales in 2016 and 2017 were exempt from the MDET. New legislation was passed in January 2018 such that implementation of the MDET was suspended until January 1, 2020. Although the MDET was suspended, if this suspension is not continued or made permanent thereafter, the MDET will be automatically reinstated starting on January 1, 2020 and would result in a significant increase in the tax burden on our industry, which could have a material negative impact on our financial condition, results of operations and our cash flows. Other elements of health care reform such as comparative effectiveness research, an independent payment advisory board, payment system reforms including shared savings pilots and other provisions could meaningfully change the way healthcare is developed and delivered, and may materially adversely impact numerous aspects of our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Research and Development

We are committed to investing in a robust product development program and to supporting a variety of clinical research studies to enhance our products, increase the body of evidence to support prescribing and reimbursing our devices, and to grow our range of product offerings. Our R&D team is comprised of engineers with a mix of BS, MS and PhD degrees in electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, biomedical engineering and computer science and augmented by outside resources as needed. The R&D team seeks to combine innovative research conducted over the last 50 years with cutting edge innovations in robotics, machine learning, and material science to continue to enhance our products and product offerings. Our regulatory, clinical, and customer service personnel work closely with our suppliers and providers to promote compliance with quality standards and good manufacturing processes, which we believe result in a high-quality product and limited customer issues.

We have continually enhanced our product offerings by increasing functionality for users by the addition of a multi-articulated wrist and introducing a powered grasp for the hand. Our flagship product is the MyoPro 2, introduced in June 2017, which features improvements in control technology, new configuration software and user interface, and a longer-lasting,pop-out battery for extended use of the brace and convenient replacement.

We plan, depending on available resources, to increase our investment in research, development, and customer service in the future in order to continually improve our system architecture and develop new product innovations that increase the value and breadth of our product offerings. Our next product offering, expected to launch in calendar year 2020, is a pediatric version of the MyoPro which is designed to meet the needs of younger patients suffering from arm and hand paralysis.

Clinical Research Studies

Evidence of efficacy involving myoelectric orthotics dates back to 1967. We have partnered with leading researchers to study the impact of its technology to restore function to a paralyzed joint as well as the real-world benefit that comes from being able to independently perform ADLs in the home, vocational tasks at work, and community activities such as shopping. A study was published in January 2017 that demonstrated the instantaneous reduction in upper limb impairment and increase in ability to complete functional tasks for chronic

stroke patients. In addition to the previous published research, Myomo also has an active grant-funded research program. Currently funded studies include a study of the MyoPro device for patients with traumatic brain injury, or TBI, induced arm impairment with the Cleveland VA and Northwestern University and a recently funded study of the device for patients with spinal cord injury, or SCI at Kessler Rehabilitation Center in New Jersey. The preliminary results from the TBI study are very promising, and have been presented at research conferences and published in a recent paper. These studies focused on the ability of MyoPro users to initiate movement of their affected limbs and perform ADLs such as picking up objects so that they may feed themselves and live more independently. In addition to the studies Myomo is directly involved in, various clinical facilities are undertaking their own research projects on the outcomes of MyoPro users, including a recent publication detailing outcomes for patients with brachial plexus injuries, or BPI, by the Mayo Clinic.

Sales and Marketing

Our strategic goal is to develop and commercialize products that become the standard of care for individuals with paralysis who cannot be successfully treated with conventional interventions such as rehabilitation therapy. Our strategy is to establish ourselves as a market leader in myoelectric-controlled orthotics by building a set of products, software applications, and value-added services based upon our patented technology platform. In addition to our recent geographic expansion to serve more areas in the United States, we are entering international markets via local partnerships and distribution arrangements to meet the large global need that we believe exists for individuals with upper limb paralysis.

We utilize digital ads on platforms such as Google and Facebook to reach patients who are potential candidates for our product. Once the prospective patient contacts us or is referred to us, either our trained clinical staff or an O&P provider will evaluate the patient for their suitability as a candidate. If the patient is a suitable candidate, we make a determination whether we will provide the MyoPro directly to the patient, what we refer to as Direct Billing, or if the O&P provider will serve that patient. Under Direct Billing. our customer service team will gather the patient’s medical records while the patient obtains a prescription from their physician. Once these documents are obtained, our patient advocacy team will submit apre-authorization request to the patient’s insurer. If we receive apre-authorization, we will proceed to cast the patient’s arm, then fabricate the MyoPro and deliver it to the patient. We also call on hospitals and O&P practices that provide our products to their patients as well as indirect sales through distributors in the United States, Canada, Europe, Chile, and Australia. The MyoPro product line has been approved by the VA system for impaired veterans, and over forty VA facilities have already ordered devices for their patients.

Our business development efforts have resulted in a growing pipeline of patients in our reimbursement process. As of September 30, 2019, 528 patients were in our reimbursement pipeline, a 137% increase compared to 222 patients in the pipeline at September 30, 2018, and a nearlysix-fold increase over the number of patients inmid-2018. As of September 30, 2019, 61 MyoPro units were in backlog, which we define as patients for whom we received insurance authorization, but revenue has not been recognized, with an estimated revenue value of $1.8 million.

To bring the MyoPro to what we believe is the large number of potential patients outside of the U.S., in July 2017 we met the criteria to apply the CE Mark, which is a manufacturer’s declaration that the product complies with the essential requirements of the relevant European Union health, safety and environmental protection legislation for the MyoPro so that it can be marketed in Europe. In October 2017 we obtained our medical device license for Canada, enabling us to provide the MyoPro to patients in that country. We have entered into distribution agreements with O&P providers in the United Kingdom, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Chile, and Australia, and received initial MyoPro orders from some of these providers in 2019. We had entered into a three-year distribution agreement with OttoBock SE & Co. KGaA, a large orthotics and prosthetics manufacture, and we elected not to renew that agreement which expires on December 31, 2019, preferring to distribute our products directly to O&P providers in international markets.

In August 2019, we announced an International Technology Licensing Program and our interest in forming partnerships to license the MyoPro technology for certain markets outside of the US. While we have not reached any agreements yet, we are continuing to hold discussions with interested parties so that we can access patients in other countries and earn licensing fees for our technology andknow-how.

We plan to increase ourdirect-to-patient advertising expenditures and field staff to continue to raise awareness and educate clinicians and patients about the MyoPro.

Competition

An individual with difficulty walking has a wide range of technology alternatives from canes and crutches to powered wheelchairs and exoskeleton suits. However, those with paralysis of the arm, wrist, and hand, whose physical challenges that we seek to address, have few options to restore function.

Rehabilitation Therapy

Rehabilitation therapy is the standard of care for upper extremity paralysis and a prerequisite to qualifying for a myoelectric orthosis such as the MyoPro. After a stroke or other traumatic injury, a large portion of survivors are able to regain much or all of their function. However, every year there are many survivors whose upper extremities remain paralyzed despite best efforts of rehabilitation therapists.

Non-Powered Braces

Some individuals are able to accomplish their functional goals with braces that arenon-powered or use springs to offset forces of gravity or muscle tightness, referred to as spasticity. Medical professionals who evaluate patients for myoelectric orthotics screen out individuals who could accomplish their goals with a simpler, less costly intervention such as these braces.

Experimental Surgery: Battelle — Brain Implants

An array of experimental interventions currently is being researched at universities andnon-profit research facilities around the world. One such innovation recently announced by Battelle Memorial Institute in Ohio involves a craniotomy, which is a surgical opening into the skull performed to implant a sensor chip in the brain. An electrical cable is connected to the top of the head connecting to a system that sends pulses of electrical stimulation to activate muscles in the forearm. The procedure is experimental, invasive, and costly, but may be offered as an alternative to a myoelectric orthosis.

Exoskeleton Suits

During the last few years, a number of companies have emerged to provide exoskeleton suits that enable those with lower extremity paralysis to stand and walk again. Companies in this space include ReWalk, Ekso Bionics, and Cyberdyne. It is possible that companies may begin to compete with solutions such as ours for the upper extremity. Ekso Bionics has recently announced a product to be used only for rehab therapy at a hospital, and we can provide no assurance that these or other companies are not currently developing competing products for the home market.

Potential New Products from O&P Manufacturers

If our business grows, interest may develop among new or existing manufacturers of other O&P devices that compete with the MyoPro, which may or may not challenge the validity of our intellectual property.

Intellectual Property

The MyoPro is protected by two core patents exclusively licensed from MIT for the life of the patents. The first patent (U.S. Pat. No. 7,396,337) covers a powered orthotic device, worn over a patient’s elbow or other joint that senses relativelylow-level muscle signals in the vicinity of the joint generated by a patient. In response to the relativelylow-level signals, the powered orthotic device moves, causing the patient’s body part to move about the joint accordingly with adjustable force and assistance settings. The patent expires on December 1, 2023. The second patent (U.S. Pat. No. 7,367,958) covers a method of providing rehabilitation movement training for a person suffering from nerve damage, stroke, spinal cord injury, neurological trauma or neuromuscular disorder by moving a body part about a joint using a powered orthotic device. The patent claims methods that include moving the body part about the joint in two directions based on an EMG signal from a muscle associated with that body part or moving the body part about the joint in one direction based on the EMG signal and in another direction based on a return force in the absence of a sensed EMG signal. This patent expires on November 21, 2023, which represents the earliest patent expiration among Myomo’s intellectual property portfolio.

The two patent licenses discussed above were granted pursuant to the MIT License. Under the MIT License , we have been granted access to those certain patent rights in exchange for the payment of royalties, which vary based on the level of our net sales. As part of the MIT License , we must pay a nonrefundable annual license maintenance fee which may be credited to any royalty amounts due in that same year. The License Agreement can be terminated if certain sales targets are not achieved.

The future minimum amounts due under this agreement for the next five years are as follows:

Under the MIT License, we issued 6,172 shares of our common stock to MIT. They have the right to purchase additional shares of our common stock to maintain their pro rata ownership.

On November 15, 2016, we entered into a waiver agreement with MIT with regard to certain obligations, or the Obligations Waiver, under the MIT License. The Obligations Waiver contemplates that we have not met certain revenue obligations, or the Revenue Obligations, and certain commercialization obligations, or the Commercial Obligations, which are required under the MIT License. Pursuant to the Revenue Obligations, we were originally obligated to have net sales of at least $200,000, $250,000, $500,000 and $750,000 in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 (and each year thereafter), respectively. Pursuant to the Commercial Obligations, we were originally obligated to introduce a home version of a “licensed product” on or before December 31, 2010, expand distribution of a licensed product to 10 major metropolitan areas on or before December 31, 2011 and expand distribution to at least one country outside of the United States on or before December 31, 2012. The Obligations Waiver waives any and all Revenue Obligations up to the date of the waiver agreement and waives the Commercial Obligations up to and through the date of the waiver agreement. The Obligations Waiver cannot be terminated by any other parties.

Myomo has eleven of its own issued patents as well. In January 2013, Myomo’s patent entitledPowered Orthotic Device was granted in Europe (European Patent No. 2079361), which is validated (currently in force) in six European countries. In June 2014, a substantially similar patent was granted in Japan (Japanese Patent No. 5557529). In November 2013 and January 2015, Myomo’s two U.S. patents issued entitledPowered Orthotic Device and Method of Using Same (U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,585,620 and 8,926,534, respectively). On July 26, 2016, Myomo’s third U.S. patent was issued (U.S. Pat. No. 9,398,994). We also have a pending patent application for China, and we plan on filing additional patent applications over time. The longest term of our patents extends intellectual property rights until 2029.

In terms of trademarks, the terms Myomo and MyoPro are registered as trademarks with the US Patent & Trademark Office. Within the first ten years from the registration dates shown above, we will be required to complete two (2) “maintenance” filings, one between the 5th and 6th years and the second between the 9th and 10th years. Each successive10-year period thereafter we will be required to complete a “maintenance” filing between every 9th and 10th year. Our trademarks were registered in 2013 and 2014.

Government Regulation

The MyoPro device and our operations including our supply chain and distribution channels are subject to regulation by the FDA and various other U.S. federal and state agencies. Under the FFDCA, medical devices are classified as Class I, Class II or Class III, depending on the degree of risk associated with the device, what is known about the type of device, and the extent of control needed to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. Classification of a device is important because the class to which a device is assigned determines, among other things, the necessity and type of FDA premarket review. We have elected to list the MyoPro Family of products under a Class II device classification regulation for biofeedback devices. Under the classification regulation, we believe our device remains 510(k)-exempt as prescription battery powered, external limb orthosis devices that are indicated for muscle relaxation or musclere-education are generally 510(k)-exempt under the classification regulation. While we believe our device to be exempt from FDA premarket review, our devices are subject to FDA’s post-market requirements, which include compliance with the applicable portions of the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, or QSR, facility registration and product listing, reporting of adverse medical events, and appropriate, truthful andnon-misleading labeling, advertising, and promotional materials.

We are also subject to regulation by foreign governmental agencies in connection with international sales. These agencies enforce laws and regulations that govern the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, advertising, marketing and distribution, and market surveillance of our medical device products.

In the European Union, medical devices are regulated under the European Union Directive (93/42/EEC), also known as the Medical Device Directive, or the MDD. An authorized third party, also called a Notified Body, must approve products for CE marking and conducts periodic inspections to ensure applicable regulatory requirements are met. The CE mark is contingent upon continued compliance to the applicable regulations and the quality system requirements of the ISO 13485 standard.

The new European Medical Devices Regulation, or the EU MDR, which was published in May 2017 with a transition period of three years, replaces the MDD. Starting May 2020, the new EU MDR will apply and no new applications under the previous directives will be permitted. During the said three-year transition period, companies need to update their technical documentation and other quality management system processes to meet the new EU MDR requirements. Under the new EU MDR requirements, CE certificates issued under the previous directives prior to May 2020 will remain valid in accordance with their term, beyond the expiration of the transition period, however certain limitations set forth in the EU MDR, such as the need to use classifications that are different from the previous directives, would apply.

We, together with Cogmedix, our primary contract manufacturer, actively maintain FDA 21 CFR Part 820 QSR and ISO 13485 Quality Management Systems for product design and development, manufacturing, distribution, and customer feedback processes. Following the introduction of a product, the FDA and comparable foreign agencies may engage in periodic audits of our quality management system, the product performance, and our advertising and promotional materials. These regulatory controls, as well as any changes in the policies of the FDA or comparable foreign agencies, can affect the time and cost associated with the development, introduction and continued availability of new products. We work to anticipate these factors in our product development processes.

We have declared conformity to European Directives and apply the CE Mark for distribution of the MyoPro product line in Europe, and we have a Medical Device License for Canada. In addition, Myomo has recently

obtained certification of our Quality System, or QS, to the Medical-Device-Single-Audit-Program, or MDSAP. This certifies compliance of the QS for sales in the United States, Canada, Brazil, Australia, and Japan. If we enter into other jurisdictions with additional international partners, we will need to seek the appropriate government approval to supply the devices in these countries. If we fail to comply with applicable foreign regulatory requirements, we may be subject to various administrative and legal actions against us, such as product recalls, product seizures and other civil and criminal sanctions.

Manufacturing

Myomo’s custom fabricated orthosis is comprised of two elements. The first is the electromechanical kit. The kit consists of the motor units, processor, sensors, and battery. Manufacturing for the electromechanical kit is provided by our supplier Cogmedix, a wholly owned subsidiary of Coughlin Companies in Worcester, MA. The second element is the custom fabrication of the orthosis itself from a model of the patient’s arm. Custom fabrication is provided by GRE, privately owned by Jonathan Naft, an executive of Myomo.See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”

If the volume and geographic reach of our sales expand, we may seek additional sources for manufacturing and custom fabrication of the devices as our needs may require.

Employees

As of September 30, 2019, we employed a total of 47 full time and 1 part time employee. All employees are subject to contractual agreements that specify requirements for confidentiality, ownership of newly developed intellectual property and restrictions on working for competitors as well as other matters.

Properties

Our primary offices are located at the Cambridge Innovation Center, One Broadway, 14th Floor, in Cambridge, Massachusetts, where we have amonth-to-month lease to operate an office consisting of 1,692 square feet of office and laboratory space. Additionally, we have offices at WeWork, 5049 Edwards Ranch, Fort Worth, TX, where we have asix-month lease to operate a call center for lead generation consisting of 310 square feet of office space. We believe our facilities are currently adequate for us to conduct our business. A number of our employees work remotely from home across the U.S.

Legal Proceedings

There are no legal proceedings material to our business or financial condition pending and, to the best of our knowledge, there are no such legal proceedings contemplated or threatened.

MANAGEMENTCORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Set forth below is information regarding our directors and executive officers as of December 2, 2019.31, 2022:

In accordance with the terms of ourOur amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that the number of our directors shall be fixed from time to time by a resolution of the majority of our board of directors. Our board of directors currently consists of five members. Our board of directors is divided into three staggered classes of directors as nearly equal in number as possible, class I, class II and class III, withIII. One class is elected each class serving staggered three-year terms.year at the annual meeting of stockholders for a term of three years. Our executive officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of our board of directors. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Paul R. Gudonishas been our Chairman of the board of directors since August 2016 and our Chief Executive Officer and a director of our company since July 2011. Mr. Gudonis was also appointed President in February 2017. He brings over 3540 years of experience in launching new technology-based products and services to our company. His career spans the fields of software, telecommunications, Internetinternet services, and robotics. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Gudonis served as President at FIRST Robotics, or FIRST, from October 2005 until June 2010. Prior to his position at FIRST, Mr. Gudonis was the Chief Executive Officer of Centra Software, Inc., from August 2003 until April 2005. Mr. Gudonis was also the Chief Executive Officer of Genuity, Inc. from January 2000 until March 2003. He has also served as Chairman of the Massachusetts High Tech Council. Mr. Gudonis is a member of the Dean’s Advisory Council at his alma mater, Northwestern University’s McCormick School of Engineering, where he earned his degree in electrical engineering. At McCormick, he serves on advisory boards of the Biomedical Engineering Department and NUvention medical device innovation program. He also earned his MBA degree from Harvard University.

We believe Mr. Gudonis’s academic and executive experience, engineering background and substantive experience in growing early stage ventures provide the requisite qualifications, skills, perspectives and experience that make him well qualified to serve on our board of directors.

David A. Henryhas been our Chief Financial Officer since February 2019. Mr. Henry brings over 30 years of financial leadership and management experience in high technology manufacturing companies. From April 2004 to July 2007 he was Chief Financial Officer of AMI Semiconductor, a NASDAQ listed company. From July 2007 through June 2017, Mr. Henry was Chief Financial Officer of American Semiconductor Corporation, a NASDAQ listed company. From August 2017 until February 2019, he was Chief Financial Officer of Eos Energy Storage LLC, a privately-held companyompany and manufacturer of grid-scale energy systems for utilities and renewable project developers. Mr. Henry is a Certified Public Accountand,Accountant. He earned his MBA from Santa Clara University and his BS in Business Administration from the University of California, Berkeley.

Jonathan Naft has been our General Manager since April 2012. Prior to working with our company, Mr. Naft was the president of Geauga Rehabilitation Engineering, GRE, an O&P practice, which he founded. Mr. Naft is

an experienced member of the O&P community and has been recognized by the American Academy of Orthotic and Prosthetics with the Tamarack Prize, and the Clinical Creativity Awards. Mr. Naft is also an examiner for the American Board for Certification in Orthotics and Prosthetics and is a past President for the Ohio Academy of Orthotists and Prosthetists. He is a graduate of The Ohio State University College of Engineering and from Northwestern University’s Prosthetic-Orthotic Center.

Clifford J. Conneighton has been our Chief Marketing Officer since August 2017 and served as a marketing consultant to our company since January 2017. Prior to joining our company, since July 2014, Mr. Conneighton served as marketing consultant and interim Chief Marketing Officer for a variety of software and internet companies. From 2012 to 2014, he served as Chief Marketing Officer for Hybris, a privately-held enterprise software company which was acquired by SAP, Inc. From 2010 to 2012, Mr. Conneighton served as Chief Strategy Officer of Elastic Path Software, a privately-held enterprise software company. From 2008 to 2010, he served as a business strategy consultant to Oracle. From 2003 to 2008, he served as Chief Marketing Officer for ATG, a public enterprise software company which was acquired by Oracle. In 1997, Mr. Conneightonco-founded Icoms, a venture-funded cloud-based commerce service provider and served as its Chief Executive Officer until 2001. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. Conneighton served as Vice President of Marketing for BBN Planet, an internet services company. From 1992 to 1994, Mr. Conneighton served as Senior Director of Marketing for Lotus Notes at Lotus Development Corporation. From 1989 to 1992, Mr. Conneighton served as a Vice President and Service Director for Gartner, Inc., an IT advisory and consultancy firm. Previously, Mr. Conneighton spent 10 years in marketing and product management at Digital Equipment Corporation and 7 years in engineering and product management at Texas Instruments. He earned a BS and MS in Systems Engineering at Case Western Reserve University.

Dr. Brandon Green has been our Chief Medical Officer since July 2017. He is a licensed physician and a board-certified prosthetist trained in general surgery at the Cleveland Clinic, physical medicine/rehabilitation at Tufts Medical Center, and prosthetics at Northwestern University. Dr. Green served as the Medical Director of United Prosthetics in Boston from July 2012 until becoming the full-time Chief Medical Officer at our company in July 2017. As Medical Director at United, he oversaw the restructuring of the prior authorization and appeals process in order to improve demonstration of medical necessity for O&P care and multidisciplinary coordination between members of the patient’s care team. Dr. Green is a frequent lecturer on O&P care to physician and patient groups, has routinely consulted for insurers looking to update their general O&P policies, and is experienced in providing direct medical/prosthetic care as well ashands-on technical fabrication of devices,sub-specializing in upper limb prosthetic rehab. Dr. Green received his BS in Biology at University of Arkansas and his Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine at Oklahoma State University.

Micah J. Mitchellhas been our Chief Commercial Officer since July 2018. Prior to joining our company, from June 2016 to December 2018, Mr. Mitchell served as Vice President, N.A. Commercial Operations and Business

2011, respectively. Prior to his current role, Mr. Crowley was also President of Small Bone Innovations, Inc. from February 2008 until February 2011. He also served as Managing Director—Healthcare Investment Banking at Friedman Billings Ramsey from September 2006 until January 2008. Mr. Crowley holds a BA from Fairfield University, an MS from Columbia University School of Business and is a Graduate, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Ft. Leavenworth, KS. We believe Mr. Crowley’s executive experience, and his financial, investment and management experience provide the requisite qualifications, skills, perspectives and experience that make him well qualified to serve on our board of directors.

Thomas F. Kirkhas been a member of our board of directors since September 2014 and lead independent director since October 2016. Mr. Kirk has been the Chief Executive Officer, a member of the board of directors of American Surgical Professionals since June 2013 and in January 2018 he was voted Chairman. Mr. Kirk was the Chief Executive Officer of Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc. from March 2008 until May 2012 and served as its Chief Operating Officer from January 2002 to February 2008. Mr. Kirk also served as a Director on Hanger’s Board from January 2002 to May 2014. From September 1998 to January 2002, Mr. Kirk was a principal with AlixPartners, LLC (formerly Jay Alix & Associates, Inc.), a management consulting company that was retained by Hanger in 2001 to facilitate its reengineering process. From May 1997 to August 1998, Mr. Kirk served as Vice President, Planning, Development and Quality for FPL Group, a full-service energy provider located in Florida. From April 1996 to April 1997, he served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Quaker Chemical Corporation in Pennsylvania. From December 1987 to March 1996, he held several positions and most recently served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Rhone Poulenc, S.A. in Princeton, New Jersey and Paris, France. From March 1977 to October 1987, he was employed by St. Joe Minerals Corp., a division of Fluor Corporation. Prior to this, he held positions in sales, commercial development, and engineering with Koppers Co., Inc. Mr. Kirk holds a Ph.D. degree in strategic planning/marketing and an MBA degree in finance from the University of Pittsburgh. He also holds a BS degree in mechanical engineering from Carnegie

Board Composition

Our board of directors currently consists of fourfive members. We have no formal policy regarding board diversity. In selecting board candidates, we seek individuals who will further the interests of our stockholders through an established record of professional accomplishment, the ability to contribute positively to our collaborativecollaborate culture, knowledge of our business and understanding of our prospective markets. We plan to recruit additional independent directors who can bring specific expertise and experience that is relevant to our business and future direction.

Classified Board

In accordance with the terms of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, ourOur board of directors is divided into three classes, class I, class II and class III, with each class serving staggered three-year terms. Upon the expiration of the term of a classclasses of directors directorsas nearly equal in thatnumber as possible. One class will be eligible to beis elected for a new three-year termeach year at the annual meeting of stockholders in the year in which theirfor a term expires.

Class I directors’ terms expire asof three years. The term of the 2021 annual meeting, Class II directors’ terms expire asclass I directors expires at the 2024 Annual Meeting. The term of the 2022class II director expires at the 2025 annual meeting and Classthe term of the class III directors’directors expires at the 2023 annual meeting. After the initial terms expire, asdirectors are expected to be elected to hold office for a three-year term or until the election and qualification of the 2020 annual meeting. their successors in office.

Audit Committee

We have a separately designated standing audit committee of our board of directors, as defined in Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The audit committee is currently comprised of three of our three independent directors: Thomas Kirk, Amy Knapp and Thomas Crowley and Tom Kirk.Crowley. Ms. Knapp is the Chair of our audit committee. Our board of directors has determined that each of the members of our audit committee is “independent” within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE American and the SEC, including for audit committee purposes, and that each