As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 25, 2010.November 5, 2012.

Registration No.                 333-          


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933


SOLIGENIX, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 

Delaware283441-1505029
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

Soligenix, Inc.
29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10
Princeton, New Jersey 08540
(609) 538-8200

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,
of registrant’sregistrant's principal executive offices)

Christopher J. Schaber, Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer
Soligenix, Inc.
29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10
Princeton, New Jersey 08540
(609) 538-8200
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)  

 
with copies to:
Leslie J. Croland, Esq.
Edwards AngellWildman Palmer & Dodge LLP
525 Okeechobee Blvd., Suite 1600
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(561) 833-7700




Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:  From time to time, at the discretion of the selling stockholders,  As soon as practicable after the effective date of this registration statement.  
hereof.  
 
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box: x
 
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
 
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
 
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large"large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) 


CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
 
Title of each class
of securities to be registered
 
 
Amount to be registered (1)
  
 
Proposed maximum offering price per unit (2)
  
 
Proposed maximum aggregate offering price (2)
  
 
 
Amount of registration fee(2)
 
Common Stock,
par value $.001 per share(3)
  46,004,113  $0.225  $11,731,048  $837 
 
Title of each class of securities to be registered
 
Proposed maximum
aggregate offering price
  
Amount of
registration fee(1)
  
Units, each unit consisting of one share of Common Stock, $0.001 par value, and a warrant to purchase up to an additional ______ share of Common Stock
 $7,000,000  $955  
Common Stock included in the Units
 $  $  
Warrants included in the Units
 $   (3
Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants included in the Units (2) $   (3
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock Purchase Rights (4)         
Total
 $7,000,000  $955  

(1)           Calculated pursuant to Rule 457(o) on the basis of the maximum aggregate offering price of all of the securities to be registered.

(1)Includes 28,752,571 shares of the Registrant’s common stock and up to 17,251,542 shares of the Registrant’s common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants issued to Selling Stockholders, as defined in the accompanying prospectus, on June 18, 2010.  Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), to the extent additional shares of Registrant’s common stock may be issued or issuable as a result of a stock split, stock dividend or other distribution declared at any time by the Registrant while this registration statement is in effect, this registration statement is hereby deemed to cover all such additional shares of common stock.
(2)           Pursuant to Rule 416, the securities being registered hereunder include such indeterminate number of additional shares of common stock as may be issuable upon exercise of warrants registered hereunder as a result of stock splits, stock dividends, or similar transactions.

(2)Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee according to Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act on the basis of the average of the high and low prices of the Registrant’s common stock quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board on June 22, 2010.
(3)           No fee required pursuant to Rule 457(g).

(3)(4)          This registration statement also covers the Preferred Share Purchase Rights issuable in accordance with the Rights Agreement, dated June 22, 2007, between the Registrant and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent, which are presently attached to and trade with the Registrant’s common stock.


The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to Section 8(a), may determine.


 
 

 
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. The Selling Stockholders may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
 
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED JUNE 25, 2010NOVEMBER 5, 2012
 
PROSPECTUS

Soligenix, Inc.SOLIGENIX, INC.

46,004,113 Shares of Common StockUP TO _______ UNITS, EACH CONSISTING OF
ONE SHARE OF COMMON STOCK AND
This prospectus relates to the sale from time to time ofWARRANTS TO PURCHASE UP TO AN ADDITIONAL _______ SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

We are offering up to 46,004,113 shares_______ units (each a “Unit” and collectively the “Units”), each Unit consisting of one share of our common stock by the selling stockholders named in this prospectus in the section “Selling Stockholders,” including their pledgees, assignees and successors-in-interest, whom we collectively refera warrant to in this document as the “Selling Stockholders.”  On June 18, 2010, we completed a private placement in which we issuedpurchase up to the Selling Stockholders an aggregateadditional _______ share of 28,752,571 sharesour common stock. The warrants entitle holders to purchase one share of our common stock together withfor each _______ warrants they hold at a price equal to purchase up to 17,251,542 shares of our common stock. As part_______% of the private placement, we issued an additional 48,780 sharesprice of oureach Unit. The Units will separate immediately and the common stock together withand warrants to purchase up to 29,268 shares of ourwill be issued separately and the common stock which shares of common stockwill trade separately.  We are not being registered under this pr ospectus. The common stock offered by this prospectus shall be adjustedrequired to coversell any additional securities as may become issuablespecific dollar amount or number of Units, but will use our best efforts to prevent dilution resulting from stock splits, stock dividends or similar transactions. The prices at which the Selling Stockholders may sell the shares will be determined by the prevailing market price for the shares or in negotiated transactions.  See “Plan of Distribution” which begins on page 48. We will not receive anyall of the proceeds fromUnits being offered. The offering expires on the earlier of (i) the date upon which all of the Units being offered have been sold, or (ii) March 31, 2013.  We and the placement agent may, upon request of any investor in this offering, sell Units to such investors that exclude the warrants, provided that the sale of any ofUnits that exclude such warrants shall be at the shares covered by this prospectus. However, we will generate proceeds in the event of a cash exercise of the warrants held by the Selling Stockholders. References in this prospectus to the “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Soligenix, Inc.same offering price per Unit as all other investors.

Our common stock is quotedpresently listed on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”)OTCQB under the symbol "SNGX."“SNGX”.  OTCQB securities are quoted on OTC Market Group's quotation and trading system.  We do not intend to apply for listing of the warrants on any securities exchange. On June 22, 2010,October 31, 2012, the last quoted sale price forof our common stock as reported on the OTCBBOTCQB was $0.26$0.44 per share.

BrokersINVESTING IN THE OFFERED SECURITIES INVOLVES RISKS, INCLUDING THOSE SET FORTH IN THE “RISK FACTORS” SECTION OF THIS PROSPECTUS BEGINNING ON PAGE 5.
 Per Unit  Total
 Offering Price per Unit    
$______
$______
 Placement Agent’s Fees   
$______
$______
 Offering Proceeds before expenses   
$______
$______
_______ has agreed to act as our placement agent in connection with this offering. In addition, we or dealers effecting transactionsthe placement agent may engage one or more sub placement agents or selected dealers.  The placement agent is not purchasing the securities offered by us, and is not required to sell any specific number or dollar amount of Units, but will assist us in thesethis offering on a “best efforts” basis.  We have agreed to pay the placement agent a cash fee equal to __% of the gross proceeds of the offering of Units by us, as well as “placement agent warrants” to purchase shares should confirm that the shares are registered under applicable state securities laws or that an exemption from registration is available.

Investing inof our common stock involves certain risks.equal to ________% of the aggregate number of shares of common stock included in Units sold in the offering. The placement agent warrants will have terms substantially similar to the warrants included in Units offered hereby. We estimate the total expenses of this offering, excluding the placement agent fees, will be approximately $_______. Because there is no minimum offering amount required as a condition to closing in this offering, the actual public offering amount, placement agent fees, and proceeds to us, if any, are not presently determinable and may be substantially less than the total maximum offering amounts set forth above. See "Risk Factors"“Plan of Distribution” beginning on page 446 of this prospectus for a discussionmore information on this offering and the placement agent arrangements. 

This offering will terminate on March 31, 2013, unless the offering is fully subscribed before that date or we decide to terminate the offering prior to that date.  In either event, the offering may be closed without further notice to you.  All costs associated with the registration will be borne by us.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined ifpassed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus is truthful or complete.prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

The Units stock may be sold directly by us to investors, through our placement agent or to or through underwriters or dealers.  See "Plan of Distribution".  If any underwriters are involved in the sale of any Units in respect of which this prospectus is being delivered, the names of such underwriters and any applicable commissions or discounts will be set forth in a prospectus supplement.  The net proceeds we expect to receive from such sale also will be set forth in a prospectus supplement.

Brokers or dealers effecting transactions in these Units should confirm that the Units are registered under the applicable state law or that an exemption from registration is available.
Soligenix, Inc.
29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10
Princeton, New Jersey 08540
(609) 538-8200

The date of this prospectus is ___________________, 20102012 
 
 
 


Table of Contents

DescriptionPage
1
2
  45
  1312
  2612
  3414
  3729
  4136
  4339
44
46
47
  4748
  4950
51
  5251
  5251
  5251
 F-i

You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus and in any accompanying prospectus supplement. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with different information.
 
We have not authorized the Selling Stockholdersplacement agent or any underwriters, brokers or dealers to make an offer of these shares of common stockthe Units in any jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted.
 
You should not assume that the information in this prospectus or prospectus supplement is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front of this prospectus.
 
 
 


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information contained in this prospectus, including the information incorporated by reference into this prospectus, includes forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are often identified by words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” “plan”"may," "will," "expect," "intend," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "continue," "plan" and similar expressions. These statements involve estimates, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed for the reasons described in this prospectus. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

You should be aware that our actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including:

·  our ability to successfully complete the confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec® for the treatment of gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host disease;
·  the possibility that orBec® may not show therapeutic effect or an acceptable safety profile in future clinical trials, or could take a significantly longer time to gain regulatory approval than we expect or may never gain approval;
·  our dependence on the expertise, effort, priorities and contractual obligations of third parties in the clinical trials, manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution of our products;
·  significant uncertainty inherent in developing vaccines against bioterror threats, and manufacturing and conducting preclinical and clinical trials of vaccines;
·  our ability to obtain regulatory approvals;
·  uncertainty as to whether our technologies will be safe and effective;
·  our ability to obtain future financing or funds when needed;
·  that product development and commercialization efforts will be reduced or discontinued due to difficulties or delays in clinical trials or a lack of progress or positive results from research and development efforts;
·  our ability to successfully obtain further grants and awards from the U.S. Government and other countries, and maintenance of our existing grants;
·  our ability to enter into any biodefense procurement contracts with the U.S. Government or other countries;
·  our ability to patent, register and protect our technology from challenge and our products from competition;
·  maintenance or expansion of our license agreements with our current licensors;
·  changes in healthcare regulation;
·  changes in the needs of biodefense procurement agencies;
·  maintenance of a successful business strategy;
·  the possibility that orBec®our products under development may not gain market acceptance; and
·  that others may develop technologies or products superior to our products.

You should also consider carefully the statements under “Risk Factors”"Risk Factors" and other sections of this prospectus, which address additional factors that could cause our actual results to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements and could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the applicable cautionary statements.

The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and, except to the extent required by federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. In addition, we cannot assess the impact of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

 
- 1 -


PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

SOLIGENIX, INC.
 UP TO _______ UNITS, EACH CONSISTING OF
 ONE SHARE OF COMMON STOCK AND
WARRANTS TO PURCHASE UP TO AN ADDITIONAL _______ SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
About Ourthis Prospectus

This summary highlights certain information appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.  For a more complete understanding of this offering, you should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the risk factors and the financial statements. References in this prospectus to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Company” and “Soligenix” refer to Soligenix, Inc.  You should read both this prospectus and any prospectus supplement together with additional information described below under the heading "Where You Can Find More Information".

About our Company

Soligenix, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in 1987.  We are a late-stage research and development stage biopharmaceutical company that is focused on developing products to treat the life-threatening side effects of cancer treatment and serious gastrointestinal diseases where there remains an unmet medical need, as well as developing several biodefense vaccines and therapeutics.

We maintain two active business segments: BioTherapeutics and Vaccines/BioDefense.

Our BioTherapeutics business segment intends to develop orBec® (oraloral beclomethasone dipropionate or oral(oral BDP) for indications such as pediatric Crohn’s disease and other biotherapeutic products, including LPMTM Leuprolide.acute radiation enteritis. Our Vaccines/BioDefense business segment intends to convert itsincludes active development programs for RiVax™, our ricin toxin vaccine, and VeloThrax™, our anthrax vaccine, and OrbeShield™, our gastrointestinal acute radiation injury program from early stage development tosyndrome (“GI ARS”) therapeutic. The advanced development of our vaccine programs is currently supported by our heat stabilization technology, known as ThermoVax™, under existing and manufacturing.on-going government grant funding.

OurAn outline of our business activities can be outlined asstrategy follows:

·  
complete the pivotal Phase 3 confirmatory clinical trial for orBec® in the treatment of acute gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host disease (“GI GVHD”);
·  
identify a development and marketing partner for orBec® for territories outside of North America, as we have granted an exclusive license to Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Sigma-Tau”) to commercialize orBec® in the U.S., Canada and Mexico;
·  
conduct and complete a Phase 2 clinical trial of orBec® for the prevention of acute GVHD;
·  conduct and completeInitiate a Phase 1/2 clinical trial of SGX201 (oral BDP) for the treatment of radiation enteritis;oral BDP, known as SGX203, in pediatric Crohn’s disease;
·  evaluate and initiate additional clinical trials to exploreEvaluate the effectiveness of oralorBec®/Oral BDP in other therapeutic indications involving inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal (“GI”) tract such as irritable bowel syndrome,prevention of acute radiation injuryenteritis and Crohn’s disease;treatment of chronic GI GVHD;
·  
reinitiate development ofDevelop RiVax™ and VeloThrax™ in combination with our other biotherapeutics products, including LPMTM Leuprolide;
·  continueproprietary vaccine heat stabilization technology, known as ThermoVax™, to secure additional government funding for each of our BioDefense programs through grants, contractsdevelop new heat stable vaccines in biodefense and procurements;
·  convert our biodefense vaccine programs from early stage development to advanced development and manufacturinginfectious diseases with the potential to collaborate and/or partner with other companies in the biodefense area;these areas;
·  acquireContinue to apply for and secure additional government funding for each of our BioTherapeutics and Vaccines/BioDefense programs through grants, contracts and/or procurements;
Acquire or in-license new clinical-stage compounds for development; and
·  exploreExplore other business development and acquisition strategies.

Our principal executive offices are located at 29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 and our telephone number is (609) 538-8200.

- 2 -

The following tables summarize the products that we currently are currently developing:

BioTherapeutic Products

Soligenix ProductTherapeutic IndicationStage of Development
orBec®
SGX203
Treatment of Acute GI GVHDPediatric Crohn’s diseasePivotal Phase 3 confirmatory trial enrolling1/2 clinical program planned
orBec®
Prevention of
SGX201Acute GI GVHDRadiation EnteritisPhase 1/2 trial enrolledcomplete; safety and preliminary efficacy demonstrated
orBec®
orBec®Treatment of Chronic GI GVHDPhase 2 trial potentially to be initiated in 2010planned
SGX 201Acute Radiation EnteritisPhase 1/2 trial initiated
LPMLPM™ Leuprolide
Endometriosis and Prostate CancerPhase 1 trial potentially to be initiated in 2010Pre-clinical

2Vaccine Thermostability Platform


Soligenix ProductIndicationStage of Development
ThermoVax™Thermostability of aluminum adjuvanted vaccinesPre-clinical

Vaccines/BioDefense Products

TargetAvailable CountermeasureSoligenix ProductIndicationStage of Development
RiVax™Vaccine against Ricin Toxin Poisoning
No vaccine or antidotePhase 1B trial enrollment complete;
currently FDA approved
Injectable ricin vaccine
Phase 1 clinical trial successfully completed
Second Phase 1 trial enrollingsafety and neutralizing antibodies for protection demonstrated
   
Radiation InjuryVeloThrax™Vaccine against Anthrax PoisoningPre-clinical
OrbeShield™Therapeutic against GI ARS
No vaccine or antidoteFollow-on pre-clinical study planned;
currently FDA approvedInitial pre-clinical study complete;
SGX 202 (pre-clinical)
successful protection in canines
 
TheSummary of the Offering

This prospectus relates to the offer and sale, from time to time, of up to 46,004,113 shares of our common stock by the Selling Stockholders, of which (i) 17,251,542 represent currently unissued shares of our common stock to be offered for resale by the Selling Stockholders upon exercise of outstanding common stock purchase warrants and (ii) 28,752,571 represent currently issued shares of our common stock to be offered for resale by the Selling Stockholders. We are also registering for sale any additional shares of common stock which may become issuable by reason of any stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization or other similar transaction effected without the receipt of consideration, which results in an increase in the number of outstanding shares of our common stock.
Securities Offered
Up to _______ Units. Each Unit will consist of one share of our common stock and a warrant to purchase up to an additional _______ shares of our common stock. Units may be issued and sold in one or more closings up to the termination date, March 31, 2013.
Offering Price
$_____ per Unit.
Description of Warrants
The warrants will be exercisable at any time during the period commencing after the date of closing and ending on the fifth anniversary of the closing date at an exercise price per share equal to _______% of the price of each Unit. We and the placement agent may, upon request of any investor in this offering, sell Units to such investors that exclude the warrants, provided that the sale of Units that exclude such warrants shall be at the same offering price per Unit as all other investors.
Common Stock Outstanding Prior to the Offering_______ shares.
 
The Selling Stockholders may sell these shares in the over-the-counter market or otherwise, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale or at negotiated prices. See “Plan of Distribution” beginning on page 48. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the Selling Stockholders. However, we will generate proceeds in the event of a cash exercise of the warrants held by the Selling Stockholders. We intend to use the net proceeds from the exercise of the warrants as working capital. See “Use of Proceeds” beginning on page 48.
As of June 22, 2010, there were 215,773,387 shares outstanding, including 28,752,571 of the 46,004,113 shares of our common stock offered by the Selling Stockholders pursuant to this prospectus. The number of shares offered by this prospectus represents approximately 21.3% of the total common stock outstanding as of June 22, 2010.

 
- 3 -

Common Stock Outstanding After the Offering_______ shares, which does not include _______ shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants included in the offered Units.
Over-Allotment Option
The placement agent will have a 30-day option to arrange for the sale of up to an additional ______% of the total Units sold (consisting of _______ shares and warrants to purchase _______ shares of common stock) to cover over-allotments.
Use of Proceeds
We expect to use the proceeds received from the offering to further develop our products and product candidates and for general working capital purposes.
OTCQB Symbol
SNGX
Risk Factors
See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 5 and the other information in this prospectus for a discussion of the factors you should consider before you decide to invest in the Units.
The total number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of October 31, 2012 was 11,160,513, which excludes the following:

129,711 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our equity incentive plans.  As of October 31, 2012, there were options to purchase 1,475,224 shares of our common stock outstanding under our equity incentive plans with a weighted average exercise price of $3.22 per share;
2,576,341 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants as of October 31, 2012 with a weighted average exercise price of $4.32 per share; and
_________ shares of common stock that will be issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $_______ per share sold as part of the Units in this offering.

All information in this prospectus assumes the placement agent does not sell any Units contained in the over-allotment option.
- 4 -

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risks, uncertainties and other factors described below before you decide whether to buy shares of our common stock. Any of the factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and prospects and could negatively impact the market price of our common stock. Below are the significant risks and uncertainties of which we are aware. Additional risks and uncertainties that we do not yet know of, or that we currently think are immaterial, may also impair our business operations. You should also refer to the other information contained in and incorporated by reference into this prospectus, including our financial statements and the related notes.

Risks Related to our IndustryBusiness
 
We have had significant losses and anticipate future losses; if additional funding cannot be obtained, we may reduce or discontinue our product development and commercialization efforts.
 
We have experienced significant losses since inception and have a significant accumulated deficit. We expect to incur additional operating losses in the future and expect our cumulative losses to increase. As of March 31, 2010,September 30, 2012, we had $5.9have approximately $3.7 million in cash available. Based on our projected budgetary needs and funding from existing grants over the next two years, we expect to be able to maintain the current level of our operations throughinto the firstfourth quarter of 2012 and conduct the pivotal Phase 3 confirmatory clinical trial of orBec® for the treatment of acute GI GVHD.2013.

We have sufficient funds through our existing biodefense grant facilities from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”), a division of the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), to finance our biodefense projects for the next several years. OnIn September 21, 2009, we announced that we had received ana NIAID grant for approximately $9.4 million for the development of our biodefense programs.programs and recently received an additional NIAID Small Business Innovation and Research (“SBIR”) grant for $600,000. Our biodefense grants have an overhead component that allows us an agency-approved percentage over our incurred costs. We estimate that the overhead component, which is approximately 22%21% above our subcontracted expenses, will finance some fixed costs for direct employees working on the grants and other administrative costs. We expect that our existing NIH biodefense grants will cover approximately $600,000 of such fixed overhead costs over the next several years.
 
Our products are positioned for or are currently in clinical trials, and we have not yet generated any significant revenues from sales or licensing of them. From inception through March 31, 2010,September 2012, we hadhave expended approximately $32.0$45.0 million developing our current product candidates for pre-clinical research and development and clinical trials, and we currently expect to spend at least $10$2 million over the next two years in connection with the development of our therapeutic and vaccine products, licenses, employment agreements, and consulting agreements. Unless and until we are able to generate sales or licensing revenue from orBec®, our lead product candidate, or another one of our product candidates, we will require additional funding to meet these commitments, sustain our research and development efforts, provide for future clinical trials, and continue our operations. There can be no assurance we can raise such fun ds.funds. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, stockholders may experience dilution of their ownership interests, and the newly issued securities may have rights superior to those of the common stock. If additional funds are raised by the issuance of debt, we may be subject to limitations on our operations. If we cannot raise such additional funds, we may have to delay or stop some or all of our drug development programs.

 
4


If we are unsuccessful in developing our products, our ability to generate revenues will be significantly impaired.

To be profitable, our organization must, along with corporate partners and collaborators, successfully research, develop and commercialize our technologies or product candidates. Our current product candidates are in various stages of clinical and pre-clinicalpre-clinical development and will require significant further funding, research, development, pre-clinical and/or clinical testing, regulatory approval and commercialization, and are subject to the risks of failure inherent in the development of products based on innovative or novel technologies. Specifically, each of the following is possible with respect to any of our product candidates:

·  we may not be able to maintain our current research and development schedules;
·  we may be unsuccessful in our efforts to secure profitable procurement contracts from the U.S. government or others for our biodefense products;
- 5 -

·  we may encounter problems in clinical trials or Named Patient Access programs (“NPAP”);trials; or
·  the technology or product may be found to be ineffective or unsafe.

If any of the risks set forth above occur, or if we are unable to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals as discussed below, we may not be able to successfully develop our technologies and product candidates and our business will be seriously harmed. Furthermore, for reasons including those set forth below, we may be unable to commercialize or receive royalties from the sale of any other technology we develop, even if it is shown to be effective, if:

·  it is not economical or the market for the product does not develop or diminishes;
·  we are not able to enter into or maintain arrangements or collaborations to manufacture and/or market the product;
·  the product is not eligible for third-party reimbursement from government or private insurers;
��  others hold proprietary rights that preclude us from commercializing the product;
·  we are not able to manufacture the product reliably;
·  others have brought to market similar or superior products; or
·  the product has undesirable or unintended side effects that prevent or limit its commercial use.

We received a “not approvable letter” from the FDA for our lead product candidate orBec®.Our business is subject to extensive governmental regulation, which can be costly, time consuming and subjects us to unanticipated delays.

Our business is subject to very stringent U.S., federal, foreign, state and local government laws and regulations, including the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, the Environmental Protection Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, and state and local counterparts to these acts. These laws and regulations may be amended, additional laws and regulations may be enacted, and the policies of the FDA and other regulatory agencies may change.

On October 18, 2007, we received a “not approvable letter” from the FDA for our lead product candidate, orBec®, for the treatment of acute GI GVHD.  The letter stated that the FDA requested data from additional clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of orBec®. The FDA also requested nonclinical and chemistry, manufacturing and controls information as part of the not approvable letter. On October 19, 2007, we requested an “End of Review Conference” with the FDA to further understand the letter and gain clarity regarding the next steps. On December 7, 2007, we announced the following guidance from that meeting: (1) a single , confirmatory, Phase 3 clinical trial could provide sufficient evidence of efficacy provided that it is well designed, well executed and provides clinically and statistically meaningful findings; (2) we anticipated working quickly with the FDA to finalize the design of the confirmatory trial under the Agency’s “Special Protocol Assessment” process; and (3) the FDA would be agreeable to reviewing a plan for a Treatment  Investigational New Drug (“Treatment IND”) as long as it does not interfere with patient accrual in a confirmatory trial, such as potentially enrolling patients that would not be eligible for the Phase 3 study.

On January 5, 2009, we reached an agreement with the FDA on the design of a confirmatory, pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial evaluating our lead product orBec® for the treatment of acute GI GVHD. The agreement was made under the FDA’s Special Protocol Assessment procedure. The confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial for the treatment of acute GI GVHD has been initiated and is expected to complete in the first half of 2011.

Although we intend to obtain FDA approval for orBec®, there can be no assurances that the FDA will ever approve orBec® for market launch. Furthermore, the FDA may mandate additional testing or data, which may take additional time and expense to provide.
5


Our business is subject to extensive governmental regulation, which can be costly, time consuming and subjects us to unanticipated delays.
The regulatory process applicable to our products requires pre-clinical and clinical testing of any product to establish its safety and efficacy. This testing can take many years and require the expenditure of substantial capital and other resources.  For example, our confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial for orBec® in the treatment of acute gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host disease (“GI GVHD”) was stopped on September 15, 2011 at the recommendation of an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (“DSMB”) as it was highly unlikely to achieve the predetermined end point of efficacy based on the interim results. Although no safety concerns were raised by the DSMB, preliminary findings indicated that there were no significant differences between the orBec® group and placebo group for the primary endpoint or for the pre-specified secondary endpoints. Given the outcome of the Phase 3 study, the Company terminated the development of orBec® for the treatment of acute GI GVHD.  Although we hope to obtain FDA approval for orBec® in a similar indication of treatment of chronic GI GVHD, there can be no assurances that the FDA will ever approve orBec® for market launch.

We may not be able to obtain, or we may experience difficulties and delays in obtaining, necessary domestic and foreign governmental clearances and approvals to market a product. Also, even if regulatory approval of a product is granted, that approval may entail limitations on the indicated uses for which the product may be marketed.

Following any regulatory approval, a marketed product and its manufacturer are subject to continual regulatory review. Later discovery of problems with a product or manufacturer may result in restrictions on such product or manufacturer. These restrictions may include withdrawal of the marketing approval for the product. Furthermore, the advertising, promotion and export, among other things, of a product are subject to extensive regulation by governmental authorities in the U.S. and other countries. If we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, we may be subject to fines, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals, product recalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions and/or criminal prosecution.

There may be unforeseen challenges in developing our biodefense products.

For development of biodefense vaccines and therapeutics, the FDA has instituted policies that are expected to result in accelerated approval. This includes approval for commercial use using the results of animal efficacy trials, rather than efficacy trials in humans. However, we will still have to establish that the vaccines we are developing are safe in humans at doses that are correlated with the beneficial effect in animals. Such clinical trials will also have to be completed in distinct populations that are subject to the countermeasures; for instance, the very young and the very old, and in pregnant women, if the countermeasure is to be licensed for civilian use. Other agencies will have an influence over the risk benefit scenarios for deploying the countermeasures and in establishing the number of doses util izedutilized in the Strategic National Stockpile. We may not be able to sufficiently demonstrate the animal correlation to the satisfaction of the FDA, as these correlates are difficult to establish and are often unclear. Invocation of the animal rule may raise issues of confidence in the model systems even if the models have been validated. For many of the biological threats, the animal models are not available and we may have to develop the animal models, a time-consuming research effort. There are few historical precedents, or recent precedents, for the development of new countermeasure for bioterrorism agents. Despite the Animal Rule, the FDA may require large clinical trials to establish safety and immunogenicity before licensure and it may require safety and immunogenicity trials in additional populations. Approval of biodefense products may be subject to post-marketing studies, and could be restricted in use in only certain populations. The government’s biodefense priorities can change, which could adversely affect the commercial opportunity for the products we are developing.
- 6 -


We will be dependent on government funding, which is inherently uncertain, for the success of our biodefense operations.

We are subject to risks specifically associated with operating in the biodefense industry, which is a new and unproven business area. We do not anticipate that a significant commercial market will develop for our biodefense products. Because we anticipate that the principal potential purchasers of these products, as well as potential sources of research and development funds, will be the U.S. government and governmental agencies, the success of our biodefense division will be dependent in large part upon government spending decisions. The funding of government programs is dependent on budgetary limitations, congressional appropriations and administrative allotment of funds, all of which are inherently uncertain and may be affected by changes in U.S. government policies resulting from various political and military developments. Our suc cessfulsuccessful receipt of government funding is also dependant on our ability to adhere to the terms and provisions of the original grant documents and other regulations.

6


If the parties we depend on for supplying our drug substance raw materials and certain manufacturing-related services do not timely supply these products and services, it may delay or impair our ability to develop, manufacture and market our products. We do not have or are anticipating having internal manufacturing capabilities.

We rely on suppliers for our drug substance raw materials and third parties for certain manufacturing-related services to produce material that meets appropriate content, quality and stability standards, which material will be used in clinical trials of our products and, after approval, for commercial distribution. To succeed, clinical trials require adequate supplies of drug substance and drug product, which may be difficult or uneconomical to procure or manufacture. We and our suppliers and vendors may not be able to (i) produce our drug substance or drug product to appropriate standards for use in clinical studies, (ii) perform under any definitive manufacturing, supply or service agreements with us or (iii) remain in business for a sufficient time to successfully produce and market our product candidates. If we do not maintain impo rtantimportant manufacturing and service relationships, we may fail to find a replacement supplier or required vendor or develop our own manufacturing capabilities which could delay or impair our ability to obtain regulatory approval for our products and substantially increase our costs or deplete profit margins, if any. If we do find replacement manufacturers and vendors, we may not be able to enter into agreements with them on terms and conditions favorable to us and, there could be a substantial delay before a new facility could be qualified and registered with the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities.

The manufacture of our products is a highly exacting process, and if we or one of our materials suppliers encounter problems manufacturing our products, our business could suffer.

The FDA and foreign regulators require manufacturers to register manufacturing facilities. The FDA and foreign regulators also inspect these facilities to confirm compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practice (“cGMP”) or similar requirements that the FDA or foreign regulators establish. We, or our materials suppliers, may face manufacturing or quality control problems causing product production and shipment delays or a situation where we or the supplier may not be able to maintain compliance with the FDA’s cGMP requirements, or those of foreign regulators, necessary to continue manufacturing our drug substance. Any failure to comply with cGMP requirements or other FDA or foreign regulatory requirements could adversely affect our clinical research activities and our ability to market and develop our products.
 
- 7 -

We do not have sales and marketing experience and our lack of experience may restrict our success in commercializing some of our product candidates.

We do not have experience in marketing or selling pharmaceutical products whether in the U.S. or internationally. Although we have a collaboration agreement with Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Sigma-Tau”) for the sales and marketing of orBec® orBec® in North America and Europe, we may be unable to establish additional satisfactory arrangements for marketing, sales and distribution capabilities necessary to commercialize and gain market acceptance for orBec®orBec® or our other product candidates. In addition, Sigma-Tau may not be able to effectively commercialize orBec®orBec® if it is approved. To obtain the expertise necessary to successfully market and sell orBec®orBec®, or any other product, potentially will require the development of our own commercial infrastructure and/or collaborative commercial arrangements and partnerships. Our ability to make that investment and also execute our current operating plan is dependent on numerous factors, including, the performance of third party collaborators with whom we may contract.

Our products, if approved, may not be commercially viable due to change in health care practice and third party reimbursement limitations.

Recent initiatives to reduce the federal deficit and to change health care delivery are increasing cost-containment efforts. We anticipate that Congress, state legislatures and the private sector will continue to review and assess alternative benefits, controls on health care spending through limitations on the growth of private health insurance premiums and Medicare and Medicaid spending, price controls on pharmaceuticals, and other fundamental changes to the health care delivery system. Any changes of this type could negatively impact the commercial viability of our products, if approved. Our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates, if they are approved, will depend in part on the extent to which appropriate reimbursement codes and authorized cost reimbursement levels of these products and related treatment are o btainedobtained from governmental authorities, private health insurers and other organizations, such as health maintenance organizations. In the absence of national Medicare coverage determination, local contractors that administer the Medicare program may make their own coverage decisions. Any of our product candidates, if approved and when commercially available, may not be included within the then current Medicare coverage determination or the coverage determination of state Medicaid programs, private insurance companies or other health care providers. In addition, third-party payers are increasingly challenging the necessity and prices charged for medical products, treatments and services.

Federal and/or state health care reform initiatives could negatively affect our business.
The availability of reimbursement by governmental and other third-party payers affects the market for any pharmaceutical product. These third-party payers continually attempt to contain or reduce the costs of healthcare. There have been a number of legislative and regulatory proposals to change the healthcare system and further proposals are likely. Medicare's policies may decrease the market for our products. Significant uncertainty exists with respect to the reimbursement status of newly approved healthcare products.
In addition, third-party payers are increasingly challenging the price and cost-effectiveness of medical products and services. Once approved, we might not be able to sell our products profitably or recoup the value of our investment in product development if reimbursement is unavailable or limited in scope, particularly for product candidates addressing small patient populations.
In addition, in some foreign countries, the proposed pricing for a drug must be approved before it may be lawfully marketed. The requirements governing drug pricing vary widely from country to country. We expect that there will continue to be a number of U.S. federal and state proposals to implement governmental pricing controls. While we cannot predict whether such legislative or regulatory proposals will be adopted, the adoption of such proposals could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and profitability.
On July 15, 2008, the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 became law with a number of Medicare and Medicaid reforms to establish a bundled Medicare payment rate that includes services and drug/labs that are currently separately billed. Bundling initiatives that have been implemented in other healthcare settings have occasionally resulted in lower utilization of services that had not previously been a part of the bundled payment. We cannot speculate on the potential sales impact to orBec® based on the new rule.
 
7- 8 -


We may not be able to retain rights licensed to us by third parties to commercialize key products or to develop the third party relationships we need to develop, manufacture and market our products.

We currently rely on license agreements from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Harvard University, the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston,Colorado, and George B. McDonald, MD for the rights to commercialize key product candidates. We may not be able to retain the rights granted under these agreements or negotiate additional agreements on reasonable terms, or at all.

Furthermore, we currently have very limited product development capabilities and no manufacturing, marketing or sales capabilities. For us to research, develop and test our product candidates, we need to contract or partner with outside researchers, in most cases with or through those parties that did the original research and from whom we have licensed the technologies. If products are successfully developed and approved for commercialization, then we will need to enter into additional collaboration and other agreements with third parties to manufacture and market our products. We may not be able to induce the third parties to enter into these agreements, and, even if we are able to do so, the terms of these agreements may not be favorable to us. Our inability to enter into these agreements could delay or preclude the development, man ufacturemanufacture and/or marketing of some of our product candidates or could significantly increase the costs of doing so. In the future, we may grant to our development partners rights to license and commercialize pharmaceutical and related products developed under the agreements with them, and these rights may limit our flexibility in considering alternatives for the commercialization of these products. Furthermore, third-party manufacturers or suppliers may not be able to meet our needs with respect to timing, quantity and quality for the products.

Additionally, if we do not enter into relationships with additional third parties for the marketing of our products, if and when they are approved and ready for commercialization, we would have to build our own sales force. If our collaboration agreement with Sigma-Tau were to be terminated, we would need to establish and build our own sales force in North America and Europe or enter into an agreement for the commercialization of orBec®orBec® with another company. Development of an effective sales force in any part of the world would require significant financial resources, time and expertise. We may not be able to obtain the financing necessary to establish a sales force in a timely or cost effective manner, if at all, and any sales force we are able to establish may n otnot be capable of generating demand for our product candidates, if they are approved.

We may suffer product and other liability claims; we maintain only limited product liability insurance, which may not be sufficient.

The clinical testing, manufacture and sale of our products involves an inherent risk that human subjects in clinical testing or consumers of our products may suffer serious bodily injury or death due to side effects, allergic reactions or other unintended negative reactions to our products. As a result, product and other liability claims may be brought against us. We currently have clinical trial and product liability insurance with limits of liability of $5 million, which may not be sufficient to cover our potential liabilities. Because liability insurance is expensive and difficult to obtain, we may not be able to maintain existing insurance or obtain additional liability insurance on acceptable terms or with adequate coverage against potential liabilities. Furthermore, if any claims are brought against us, even if we are fully cover edcovered by insurance, we may suffer harm such as adverse publicity.

 
8


We may not be able to compete successfully with our competitors in the biotechnology industry.

The biotechnology industry is intensely competitive, subject to rapid change and sensitive to new product introductions or enhancements. Most of our existing competitors have greater financial resources, larger technical staffs, and larger research budgets than we have, as well as greater experience in developing products and conducting clinical trials. Our competition is particularly intense in the gastroenterology and transplant areas and is also intense in the therapeutic area of inflammatory bowel diseases. We face intense competition in the biodefense area from various public and private companies and universities as well as governmental agencies, such as the U.S. Army, which may have their own proprietary technologies that may directly compete with our technologies. In addition, there may be other companies that are currently dev elopingdeveloping competitive technologies and products or that may in the future develop technologies and products that are comparable or superior to our technologies and products. We may not be able to compete successfully with our existing and future competitors.
- 9 -


We may be unable to commercialize our products if we are unable to protect our proprietary rights, and we may be liable for significant costs and damages if we face a claim of intellectual property infringement by a third party.

Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patents, protect trade secrets and operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others. In the absence of patent and trade secret protection, competitors may adversely affect our business by independently developing and marketing substantially equivalent or superior products and technology, possibly at lower prices. We could also incur substantial costs in litigation and suffer diversion of attention of technical and management personnel if we are required to defend ourselves in intellectual property infringement suits brought by third parties, with or without merit, or if we are required to initiate litigation against others to protect or assert our intellectual property rights. Moreover, any such litigation may not be resolved in our favor.

Although we and our licensors have filed various patent applications covering the uses of our product candidates, patents may not be issued from the patent applications already filed or from applications that we might file in the future. Moreover, the patent position of companies in the pharmaceutical industry generally involves complex legal and factual questions, and recently has been the subject of much litigation. Any patents we have obtained, or may obtain in the future, may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. To date, no consistent policy has been developed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office regarding the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology patents.

In addition, because patent applications in the U.S. are maintained in secrecy until patents issue, and because publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature often lags behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that we and our licensors are the first creators of inventions covered by any licensed patent applications or patents or that we or they are the first to file. The Patent and Trademark Office may commence interference proceedings involving patents or patent applications, in which the question of first inventorship is contested. Accordingly, the patents owned or licensed to us may not be valid or may not afford us protection against competitors with similar technology, and the patent applications licensed to us may not result in the issuance of patents.

It is also possible that our patented technologies may infringe on patents or other rights owned by others, licenses to which may not be available to us. We may not be successful in our efforts to obtain a license under such patent on terms favorable to us, if at all. We may have to alter our products or processes, pay licensing fees or cease activities altogether because of patent rights of third parties.

In addition to the products for which we have patents or have filed patent applications, we rely upon unpatented proprietary technology and may not be able to meaningfully protect our rights with regard to that unpatented proprietary technology. Furthermore, to the extent that consultants, key employees or other third parties apply technological information developed by them or by others to any of our proposed projects, disputes may arise as to the proprietary rights to this information, which may not be resolved in our favor.

9


Our business could be harmed if we fail to retain our current personnel or if they are unable to effectively run our business.

We currently have only 139 employees and we depend upon these employees to manage the day-to-day activities of our business. Because we have such limited personnel, the loss of any of them or our inability to attract and retain other qualified employees in a timely manner would likely have a negative impact on our operations. We will not be successful if our management team cannot effectively manage and operate our business. Several members
- 10 -


Instability and volatility in the financial markets could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

During recent months, there has been substantial volatility and a decline in financial markets due at least in part to the deteriorating global economic environment. In addition, there has been substantial uncertainty in the capital markets and access to additional financing is uncertain. Moreover, customer spending habits may be adversely affected by the current economic crisis. These conditions could have an adverse effect on our industry and business, including our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

To the extent that we do not generate sufficient cash from operations, we may need to issue stock or incur indebtedness to finance our plans for growth. Recent turmoil in the credit markets and the potential impact on the liquidity of major financial institutions may have an adverse effect on our ability to fund our business strategy through borrowings, under either existing or newly created instruments in the public or private markets on terms we believe to be reasonable, if at all.

Risks Related to our Common Stock 

Our common stock price is highly volatile.

The market price of our common stock, like that of many other research and development public pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, has been highly volatile and may continue to be so in the future due to a wide variety of factors, including:

·  announcements by us or others of results of pre-clinical testing and clinical trials;
·  announcements of technological innovations, more important bio-threats or new commercial therapeutic products by us, our collaborative partners or our present or potential competitors;
·  our quarterly operating results and performance;
·  developments or disputes concerning patents or other proprietary rights;
·  acquisitions;
·  litigation and government proceedings;
·  adverse legislation;
·  changes in government regulations;
·  our available working capital;
·  economic and other external factors; and
·  general market conditions.

Since January 1, 2009, our2012, the closing stock price (split adjusted) has fluctuated between a high of $0.38$0.80 per share to a low of $0.06$0.23 per share. As of June 22, 2010,October 31, 2012, our common stock tradedclosed at $0.26$0.44 per share. The fluctuation in the price of our common stock has sometimes been unrelated or disproportionate to our operating performance. In addition, potential dilutive effects of future sales of shares of common stock by the Company, and subsequentas well as the potential sale of common stock by the holders of warrants and options, could have an adverse effect on the market price of our shares.

10


Our common stock trades on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board.

Our common stock trades on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) securities marketOTCQB under the symbol “SNGX.” The OTCBBOTCQB is a decentralized market regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in which securities are traded via an electronic quotation system that serves more than 3,000 companies. On the OTCBB,OTCQB, securities are traded by a network of brokers or dealers who carry inventories of securities to facilitate the buy and sell orders of investors, rather than providing the order matchmaking service seen in specialist exchanges. OTCBBOTCQB securities include national, regional, and foreign equity issues. Companies traded on the OTCBBOTCQB must be current in their reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and other regulatory authorities.
- 11 -


If our common stock is not listed on a national exchange or market, the trading market for our common stock may become illiquid. Our common stock is subject to the penny stock rules of the SEC, which generally are applicable to equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 per share, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, before a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the custom ercustomer with bid and ask quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. In addition, the penny stock rules require that, before a transaction in a penny stock that is not otherwise exempt from such rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. As a result of these requirements, our common stock could be priced at a lower price and our stockholders could find it more difficult to sell their shares.

Shareholders may suffer substantial dilution related to issued stock warrants and options.options.

We have a number of agreements or obligations that may result in dilution to investors. These include:

warrants to purchase a total of approxmately 59,793,684approximately 2,576,341 shares of our common stock at a current weighted average exercise price of approxmately $0.252;approximately $4.32; and
options to purchase approxmately 18,685,414approximately 1,475,224 shares of our common stock at a current weighted average exercise price of approxmately $0.243.approximately $3.22.

To the extent that warrants or options are exercised, our stockholders will experience dilution and our stock price may decrease.

The sale of our common stock to Fusion Capital may cause dilution and the sale of the shares of common stock acquired by Fusion Capital could cause the price of our common stock to decline.

On February 14, 2008, we entered into an $8,500,000 common stock purchase agreement with Fusion Capital.  The Fusion Capital facility, as amended, allows us to require Fusion Capital to purchase between $80,000 and $1.0 million, depending on certain conditions, of our common stock up to an aggregate of $8.5 million over approximately a 43-month period, ending on October 31, 2011. As part of that agreement, we issued Fusion Capital 1,275,000 shares of common stock as a commitment fee. In connection with the execution of the common stock purchase agreement, Fusion Capital purchased 2,777,778 common shares and a four-year warrant to purchase 1,388,889 shares of common stock at $0.22 per share, for an aggregate price of $500,000.  From February 14, 2008 through May 2010, we have issued an additional 2,015,290 shares of common stock and a five-year warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at $0.303 per share and received an additional $312,500 from the Fusion Capital facility.

11

In connection with entering into the agreement, we authorized the sale to Fusion Capital of up to 25,327,778 shares of our common stock.  The number of shares ultimately offered for sale by Fusion Capital is dependent upon the number of shares purchased by Fusion Capital under the agreement. The purchase price for the common stock to be sold to Fusion Capital pursuant to the common stock purchase agreement will fluctuate based on the price of our common stock. All 25,327,778 shares registered by us for sale by Fusion Capital are freely tradable.  It is anticipated that those shares will be sold over a period of up to 18 months from April 30, 2010, the date of the prospectus covering the Fusion Capital shares.  Depending upon market liquidity at the time, a sale of these shares at any given time could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline. Fusion Capital may ultimately purchase all, some or none of the approximately 18 million shares of common stock not yet issued.  After it has acquired such shares, it may sell all, some or none of such shares. Therefore, sales to Fusion Capital by us under the agreement may result in substantial dilution to the interests of other holders of our common stock. The sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, or anticipation of such sales, could make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and at a price that we might otherwise wish to effect sales. However, we have the right to control the timing and amount of any sales of our shares to Fusion Capital and the agreement may be terminated by us at any time at our discretion without any cost to us.

The common stock purchase agreement with Fusion Capital also may be terminated in the event of a default under the agreement.  In addition, we cannot require Fusion Capital to purchase any shares of our common stock if the purchase price is less than $0.10 per share.  Thus, we may be unable to sell shares of our common stock to Fusion Capital when we need the funds, and that could severely harm our business and financial condition and our ability to continue to develop and commercialize our products.  The closing price of our common stock on June 22, 2010 was $0.26 per share.

Our shares of common stock are thinly traded, so stockholders may be unable to sell at or near ask prices or at all if they need to sell shares to raise money or otherwise desire to liquidate their shares.

Our common stock has from time to time been “thinly-traded,” meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common stock at or near ask prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company that is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would be reluctant to follow an unproven company such as ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares until such time as we become more seasoned and viable. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in o urour shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. We cannot give stockholders any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our common shares will develop or be sustained, or that current trading levels will be sustained.
USE OF PROCEEDS

We estimate that we will receive up to $_______ in net proceeds from the sale of Units in this offering, based on an assumed price of $_______ per Unit and after deducting estimated placement agent fees and estimated offering expenses payable by us.  We will use the net proceeds from this offering to further develop our products and product candidates and for working capital and other general corporate purposes.  

DILUTION

If you purchase Units in this offering, and assuming no value is attributed to the warrants, your interest will be diluted immediately to the extent of the difference between the assumed public offering price of $_______ per Unit and the as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately following this offering.

Our net tangible book value as of September 30, 2012 was approximately $3.1 million, or approximately $0.28 per share. Net tangible book value per share represents our total tangible assets less total tangible liabilities, divided by the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2012.
 
- 12 -


Net tangible book value dilution per Unit to new investors represents the difference between the amount per Unit paid by purchasers in this offering and the as adjusted net tangible book value per share of common stock immediately after completion of this offering, assuming that no value is attributed to the warrants. After giving effect to our sale of up to _______ Units in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $_______ per Unit, and after deducting the placement agent commissions and estimated offering expenses, our as adjusted net tangible book value as of September 30, 2012 would have been $_______ million, or $_______ per share. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $_______ per share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value of $_______ per Unit to purchasers of Units in this offering, as illustrated in the following table:

Assumed public offering price per Unit
 $____ 
     
Net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2012
 $0.28 
     
Increase in net tangible book value per Unit attributable to new investors
 $____ 
     
Adjusted net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2012, after giving effect to the offering $____ 
     
Dilution per Unit to new investors in the offering
 $____ 
The above discussion and tables do not include the following:
129,711 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under our equity incentive plans.  As of October 31, 2012, there were options to purchase 1,475,224 shares of our common stock outstanding under our equity incentive plans with a weighted average exercise price of $3.22 per share;
2,576,341 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants as of October 31, 2012 with a weighted average exercise price of $4.32 per share; and
_________ shares of common stock that will be issuable upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of $_______ per share sold as part of the Units in this offering.
- 13 -

BUSINESS

Our Business Overview

Soligenix, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in 1987.  We are a late-stage research and development stage biopharmaceutical company that is focused on developing products to treat the life-threatening side effects of cancer treatment and serious gastrointestinal diseases where there remains an unmet medical need, as well as developing several biodefense vaccines and therapeutics.

We maintain two active business segments: BioTherapeutics and Vaccines/BioDefense.

Our BioTherapeutics business segment intends to develop orBec® (oraloral beclomethasone dipropionate or oral(oral BDP) for indications such as pediatric Crohn’s disease and other biotherapeutic products, including LPMTM Leuprolide.acute radiation enteritis. Our Vaccines/BioDefense business segment intends to convert itsincludes active development programs for RiVax™, our ricin toxin vaccine, and VeloThrax™, our anthrax vaccine, and OrbeShield™, our gastrointestinal acute radiation injury program from early stage development tosyndrome (“GI ARS”) therapeutic. The advanced development of our vaccine programs is currently supported by our heat stabilization technology, known as ThermoVax™, under existing and manufacturing.on-going government grant funding.

OurAn outline of our business activities can be outlined asstrategy follows:

·  
complete the pivotal Phase 3 confirmatory clinical trial for orBec® in the treatment of acute gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host disease (“GI GVHD”);
·  
identify a development and marketing partner for orBec® for territories outside of North America, as we have granted an exclusive license to Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to commercialize orBec® in the U.S., Canada and Mexico;
·  
conduct and complete a Phase 2 clinical trial of orBec® for the prevention of acute GVHD;
·  conduct and completeInitiate a Phase 1/2 clinical trial of SGX201 (oral BDP) for the treatment of radiation enteritis;oral BDP, known as SGX203, in pediatric Crohn’s disease;
·  evaluate and initiate additional clinical trials to exploreEvaluate the effectiveness of oralorBec®/Oral BDP in other therapeutic indications involving inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal (“GI”) tract such as irritable bowel syndrome,prevention of acute radiation injuryenteritis and Crohn’s disease;treatment of chronic GI GVHD;
·  
reinitiate development ofDevelop RiVax™ and VeloThrax™ in combination with our other biotherapeutics products, including LPMTM Leuprolide;
·  continueproprietary vaccine heat stabilization technology, known as ThermoVax™, to secure additional government funding for each of our BioDefense programs through grants, contractsdevelop new heat stable vaccines in biodefense and procurements;
·  convert our biodefense vaccine programs from early stage development to advanced development and manufacturinginfectious diseases with the potential to collaborate and/or partner with other companies in the biodefense area;these areas;
·  acquireContinue to apply for and secure additional government funding for each of our BioTherapeutics and Vaccines/BioDefense programs through grants, contracts and/or procurements;
Acquire or in-license new clinical-stage compounds for development; and
·  exploreExplore other business development and acquisition strategies.

Our principal executive offices are located at 29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 and our telephone number is (609) 538-8200.


Our Products in Development

The following tables summarize the products that we currently are currently developing:
 
BioTherapeutic Products

Soligenix ProductTherapeutic IndicationStage of Development
orBec®
SGX203
Treatment of Acute GI GVHDPediatric Crohn’s diseasePivotal Phase 3 confirmatory trial enrolling1/2 clinical program planned
orBec®
Prevention of
SGX201Acute GI GVHDRadiation EnteritisPhase 1/2 trial enrolledcomplete; safety and preliminary efficacy demonstrated
orBec®
orBec®Treatment of Chronic GI GVHDPhase 2 trial potentially to be initiated in 2010planned
SGX 201Acute Radiation EnteritisPhase 1/2 trial initiated
LPMLPM™ Leuprolide
Endometriosis and Prostate CancerPhase 1 trial potentially to be initiated in 2010Pre-clinical

Vaccine Thermostability Platform

Soligenix ProductIndicationStage of Development
ThermoVax™Thermostability of aluminum adjuvanted vaccinesPre-clinical

Vaccines/BioDefense Products

TargetAvailable CountermeasureSoligenix ProductIndicationStage of Development
RiVax™Vaccine against Ricin Toxin Poisoning
No vaccine or antidotePhase 1B trial enrollment complete;
currently FDA approved
Injectable ricin vaccine
Phase 1 clinical trial successfully completed
Second Phase 1 trial enrollingsafety and neutralizing antibodies for protection demonstrated
   
Radiation InjuryVeloThrax™Vaccine against Anthrax PoisoningPre-clinical
OrbeShield™Therapeutic against GI ARS
No vaccine or antidoteFollow-on pre-clinical study planned;
currently FDA approvedInitial pre-clinical study complete;
SGX 202 (pre-clinical)
successful protection in canines
 
BioTherapeutics Overview
 
orBec® orBec® and oralOral BBDPDP

orBec®orBec®/oral BDP represents a first-of-its-kind oral, locally acting therapy tailored to treat the gastrointestinal manifestation of GI GVHD, the organ system where GVHD is most frequently encountered and highly problematic. orBec® is intended to reduce the need for systemic immunosuppressive drugs to treat acute GI GVHD. The active ingredient in orBec® is beclomethasone dipropionate (“BDP”), a highly potent, topically ac tive corticosteroid that has a local effect on inflamed tissue.inflammation. BDP has been marketed in the U.S. and worldwide since the early 1970’s1970s as the active pharmaceutical ingredient in a nasal spray and in a metered-dose inhaler for the treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma. orBec® isorBec®/oral BDPis specifically formulated for oral administration as a single product consisting of two tablets. One tablet is intended to release BDP in the upper sections of the GI tract and the other tablet is intended to release BDP in the lower sections of the GI tract.

Based on data from the prior Phase 3 study of orBec®, the current confirmatory Phase 3 study is a highly powered, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial and will seek to enroll an estimated 166 patients.  The primary endpoint is the treatment failure rate at Study Day 80. This endpoint was successfully measured as a secondary endpoint (p-value  0.005) in the previous Phase 3 study as a key measure of durability following a 50-day course of treatment with orBec® (i.e., 30 days following cessation of treatment).

In addition to issued patents and pending worldwide patent applications held by or exclusively licensed to us, orBec®orBec®/oral BDP would potentially benefit from orphan drug designations in the U.S. and in Europe for the treatment of GI GVHD, as well as an orphan drug designation in the U.S. for the treatment of chronic GI GVHD.Europe. Orphan drug designations provide for 7 and 10 years of market exclusivity upon approval in the U.S. and Europe, respectively.


Historical Background

Two prior randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials support orBec®’s ability to provide clinically meaningful outcomes when compared with the current standard of care, including a lowered exposure to systemic corticosteroids following allogeneic transplantation. Currently, there are no approved products to treat GI GVHD. The first trial was a 60-patient Phase 2 single-center clinical trial conducted at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (“FHCRC”) in Seattle, Washington. The second trial was a 129-patient pivotal Phase 3 multi-center clinical trial of orBec® conducted at 16 leading bone marrow/stem cell transplant ation centers in the U.S. and France. Although orBec® did not achieve statistical significance in the primary endpoint of its pivotal trial, namely median time-to-treatment failure through Day 50 (p-value 0.1177), orBec® did achieve statistical significance in other key secondary endpoints such as the proportion of patients free of GVHD at Day 50 (p-value 0.05) and Day 80 (p-value 0.005) and the median time-to-treatment failure through Day 80 (p-value 0.0226), as well as a 66% reduction in mortality among patients randomized to orBec® at 200 days post-transplant with only 5 patient (8%) deaths in the orBec® group compared to 16 patient (24%) deaths in the placebo group (p-value 0.0139). Within one year after randomization in the pivotal Phase 3 trial, 18 patients (29%) in the orBec® group and 28 patients (42%) in the placebo group died (46% reduction in mortality, p-value 0.04).

In the Phase 2 study, the primary endpoint was the clinically relevant determination of whether GI GVHD patients at Day 30 (the end of treatment) had a durable GVHD treatment response as measured by whether or not they were able to consume at least 70% of their estimated caloric requirement. The GVHD treatment response at Day 30 was 22 of 31 (71%) vs. 12 of 29 (41%) in the orBec® and placebo groups, respectively (p-value 0.02). Additionally, the GVHD treatment response at Day 40 (10 days post cessation of therapy) was 16 of 31 (52%) vs. 5 of 29 (17%) in the orBec® and placebo groups, respectively (p-value 0.007).

Based on the data from the above referenced Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies, on September 21, 2006, we filed a new drug application (“NDA”) for our lead product orBec® with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for the treatment of acute GI GVHD. On October 18, 2007, we received a not approvable letter from the FDA in response to our NDA for orBec® for the treatment of acute GI GVHD. In the letter, the FDA requested additional clinical trial data to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of orBec®.  The FDA also requeste d nonclinical and chemistry, manufacturing and controls information as part of this letter.
In December 2008, we reached agreement with the FDA on the design of a confirmatory, pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial evaluating orBec® for the treatment of acute GI GVHD under the FDA’s Special Protocol Assessment (“SPA”) procedure. An agreement via the SPA procedure is an agreement with the FDA that a Phase 3 clinical trial design (e.g., endpoints, sample size, control group and statistical analyses) is acceptable to support a regulatory submission seeking new drug approval. After the study begins, the FDA can only change a SPA for very limited reasons. Further, in June 2009, we received Protocol Assistance feedback from the European Medicines Agency (“EMEA”) on the design of the Phase 3 clinical trial for orBec®.  The EMEA agreed that should the new confirmatory Phase 3 study produce positive results, the data would be sufficient to support a marketing authorization in all 27 European Union member states. The confirmatory Phase 3 trial has been initiated and is expected to complete in the first half of 2011.
If the confirmatory Phase 3 trial is successful, we will file a complete response to the FDA action letter.  This response is expected to be designated a class II response with a corresponding FDA review time frame of 6 months.
We are currently conducting a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 clinical trial of orBec® for the prevention of acute GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (“HCT”) with myeloablative conditioning regimens. The trial is being conducted by Paul Martin, M.D., at the FHCRC and is being supported, in large part, by a grant from the National Institutes of Health. We will not receive any direct monetary benefit from this grant, but if successful, this funded trial could serve to increase the value of our orBec®/oral BDP program.  The Phase 2 trial has completed its enrollment of 140 patients. The primary endpoint of th e trial is the proportion of subjects who develop acute GVHD with severity sufficient to require systemic immunosuppressive treatment on or before day 90 after transplantation.  Patients in this study will begin dosing at the start of the conditioning regimen and continue through day 75 following HCT. Results are expected in the second half of 2010.


Mortality Results
 Phase 3 TrialPhase 2 Trial
 
orBec®
Placebo
orBec®
Placebo
Number of patients randomized62673129
Number (%) who died5 (8%)16 (24%)3 (10%)6 (21%)
Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)0.33 (0.12, 0.89)0.47 (0.12, 1.87)
Death with infection*3 (5%)9 (13%)2 (6%)5 (17%)
Death with relapse*3 (5%)9 (13%)1 (3%)4 (14%)

*Some patients died with both infection and relapse of their underlying malignancy.
Among the data from the Phase 3 clinical study of orBec® reported in the January 2007 issue of Blood, the peer-reviewed Journal of the American Society of Hematology, survival at the pre-specified endpoint of 200 days post-transplantation showed a clinically meaningful and statistically significant result. According to the manuscript, “the risk of mortality during the 200-day post-transplantation period was 67% lower with orBec® treatment compared to placebo treatment (hazard ratio 0.33; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.89; p-value 0.03, Wald chi-square test).” Th e most common proximate causes of death by transplantation day-200 were relapse of the underlying malignancy and infection. Relapse of the underlying hematologic malignancy had contributed to the deaths of 9/67 patients (13.4%) in the placebo arm and 3/62 patients (4.8%) in the BDP arm. Infection contributed to the deaths of 9/67 patients (13.4%) in the placebo arm and 3/62 (4.8%) in the BDP arm. Acute or chronic GVHD was the proximate cause of death in 3/67 patients (4.5%) in the placebo arm and in 1/62 (1.6%) in the BDP arm.

In addition, a subgroup analysis also revealed that patients dosed with orBec® who had received stem cells from unrelated donors had a 94% reduction in the risk of mortality 200 days post-transplantation.

In this Phase 3 study, orBec® showed continued survival benefit when compared to placebo one year after randomization. Overall, 18 patients (29%) in the orBec® group and 28 patients (42%) in the placebo group died within one year of randomization (46% reduction in mortality, p-value 0.04).  Results from the Phase 2 trial also demonstrated enhanced long-term survival benefit with orBec® versus placebo. In that study, at one year after randomization, 6 of 31 patients (19%) in the orBec® group had d ied while 9 of 29 patients (31%) in the placebo group had died (45% reduction in mortality, p-value 0.26). Pooling the survival data from both trials demonstrated that the survival benefit of orBec® treatment was sustained long after orBec® was discontinued and extended well beyond 3 years after the transplantation. As of September 25, 2005, median follow-up of patients in the two trials was 3.5 years (placebo patients) and 3.6 years (orBec® patients), with a range of 10.6 months to 11.1 years. The risk of mortality was 37% lower for patients randomized to orBec® compared with placebo (p-value 0.03).

A retrospective analysis of survival at 200 days post-transplantation in the supportive Phase 2 clinical trial showed consistent response rates with the Phase 3 trial; three patients (10%) who had been randomized to orBec® had died, compared with six deaths (21%) among patients who had been randomized to placebo, leading to a reduced hazard of day-200 mortality, although not statistically significantly different.  Detailed analysis of the likely proximate cause of death showed that mortality with infection or with relapse of underlying malignancy were both reduced in the same proportion after treatment with orBec® compared to placebo.  By transplantat ion day-200, relapse of hematologic malignancy had contributed to the deaths of 1 of 31 patients (3%) in the orBec® arm and 4 of 29 patients (14%) in the placebo arm.  Infection contributed to the deaths of 2 of 31 patients (6%) in the orBec® arm and 5 of 29 patients (17%) in the placebo arm.

Safety and Adverse Events

The frequencies of severe adverse events, adverse events related to study drug, and adverse events resulting in study drug discontinuation were all comparable to that of the placebo group in both trials. Patients who remained on orBec® until Day 50 in the Phase 3 study had a higher likelihood of having biochemical evidence of abnormal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function compared to patients on placebo. This effect was far less pronounced than those seen in patients on high dose prednisone.


Commercialization and Market

We anticipate the market potential for orBec® for the treatment of acute GI GVHD to be approximately 50% of the more than 10,000 allogeneic bone marrow and stem cell transplantations that occur each year in the U.S.

On February 11, 2009, we entered into a collaboration and supply agreement with Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the commercialization of orBec®.orBec®/oral BDP. Sigma-Tau is a pharmaceutical company that develops novel therapies for the unmet needs of patients with rare diseases. Pursuant to this agreement, Sigma-Tau has an exclusive license to commercialize orBec®orBec®/oral BDP in the U.S., Canada and Mexico (the “Territory”(“the Territory”). Sigma-Tau is obligated to make payments upon the attainment of significant milestones, as set forth in the agreement. The first milestone payment of $1 million was made in connection with the enrollment of the first patient in our confirmatory Phase 3 clin ical trial of orBec® for the treatment of acute GI GVHD in September 2009. Total additionalremaining milestone payments due from Sigma-Tau for orBec®orBec®/oral BDP under the agreement could reach up to $9 million. Sigma-Tau will pay us a 35% royalty (inclusive of(Soligenix to provide finished drug supply)product) on net sales in the Territory as well as pay for commercialization expenses, including launch activities. In connection

The Collaboration and Supply Agreement with Sigma-Tau expires on a country-by-country basis on the later of: (i) 10 years after the date of the first commercial sale of orBec®/oral BDP by Sigma-Tau in such country; or (ii) the expiration of the last to expire of the Company’s patents and patent applications relating to orBec®/oral BDP in such country. Upon the expiration of the initial term, on a country-by-country basis, the agreement is automatically renewed for periods of five years. During such renewal periods, we and Sigma-Tau have the right to terminate the agreement for convenience upon six months and 18 months, respectively, prior written notice. If we terminate the agreement for convenience, we are required to transfer to Sigma-Tau or its designee, for no consideration, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“the FDA”) and European Medicines Agency (“EMEA”) authorizations which are necessary for the marketing, use, distribution and sale of orBec®/oral BDP and all relevant data and know-how necessary to manufacture and commercialize orBec®/oral BDP in the country and grant to Sigma-Tau a royalty-free, fully paid, perpetual and irrevocable license, with the executionright to sublicense, to all trademarks and such know-how.
Either party may terminate the agreement: (i) in the event the other party breaches any material obligation; or (ii) upon the initiation of a proceeding in bankruptcy (voluntary or involuntary), reorganization, dissolution, liquidation or similar proceeding or occurrence. We also have the right to terminate the agreement in the event that Sigma-Tau challenges or assists any third party in the challenge of the collaborationvalidity of any of our patents or patent applications relating to orBec®/oral BDP.

Upon termination other than for breach by Sigma-Tau, Sigma-Tau has the right to process and supplysell its inventory for a period of three months following the date of termination, subject to the payment of the amounts owed under the agreement, to us and continued compliance with the terms of the agreement.
On July 28, 2011, we entered into a common stock purchase agreementannounced the expansion and amendment of our North American licensing partnership with Sigma-Tau pursuant to which we sold 25 million shares of our common stock to Sigma-Tau for $0.18 per share, for an aggregate price of $4,500,000.  The purchase price was equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the average trading price of our common stock over the five trading days prior to February 11, 2009.  On November 26, 2008, prior to entering the collaboration agreement, we sold Sigma-Tau 16,666,667 common shares at $0.09 per share (the market price at the time) for proceeds of $1,500,000 in exchange for the development and commercialization of orBec®/oral BDP into the “European Territory” (as defined in the amendment). Pursuant to this amendment, we received an up-front non-refundable payment of $5 million and granted Sigma-Tau an exclusive rightlicense to negotiatecommercialize orBec®/oral BDP in the European territory. The amendment requires Sigma-Tau to make additional payments to us in the aggregate amount of $11 million upon the achievement of certain milestones. The amendment also requires Sigma-Tau to pay us a collaboration deal with us until March 1, 2009.40% royalty (Soligenix to provide finished drug product) on net sales in the European Territory and pay for all commercialization expenses, including launch activities.

Additionally, orBec® is currently available in Named Patient Access Programs (“NPAPs”) in South Korea, Latin America, Canada, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and the ASEAN countries.  The NPAPs are compassionate use drug supply programs under which medical practitioners can legally supply investigational drugs to their eligible patients.  Under this program, drugs can be administered to patients who are suffering from serious illnesses prior to the drug being approved by the various regional regulatory authorities.

We believe the potential worldwide market for orBec® to be approximately $400orBec®/oral BDP is in excess of $500 million for all GVHDGI applications, namely, treatment of acuteCrohn’s disease, radiation enteritis, GI ARS, and chronic GI GVHD and prevention of acute GVHD.
About GVHD
GVHD occurs in patients following allogeneic stem cell transplantation in which tissues of the host, most frequently the gut, liver, and skin, are attacked by lymphocytes from the donor (graft) marrow. Patients with mild to moderate GI GVHD present to the clinic with early satiety, anorexia, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. If left untreated, symptoms of GI GVHD persist and can progress to necrosis and exfoliation of most of the epithelial cells of the intestinal mucosa, frequently a fatal condition. Approximately 50% of the more than 10,000 annual allogeneic transplantation patients in the U.S. will develop some form of acute GI GVHD.

GI GVHD is one of the most common causes for the failure of stem cell transplantation. These procedures are being increasingly utilized to treat leukemia and other cancer patients with the prospect of eliminating residual disease and reducing the likelihood of relapse. orBec® represents a first-of-its-kind oral, locally acting therapy tailored to treat the gastrointestinal manifestation of GVHD, the organ system where GVHD is most frequently encountered and highly problematic. orBec® is intended to reduce the need for systemic immunosuppressives to treat acute GI GVHD. Currently used systemic immunosuppressives utilized to control GI GVHD substantially inhibit the highly desirable Graft-versus-Leukemia (“GVL”) effect of stem cell transplantations, leading to high rates of aggressive forms of relapse, as well as substantial rates of mortality due to opportunistic infection.


About Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (“HCT”) is considered a potentially curative option for many leukemias as well as other forms of blood cancer.  In an allogeneic HCT procedure, hematopoietic stem cells are harvested from the blood or bone marrow of a closely matched relative or unrelated person, and are transplanted into the patient following either high-dose chemotherapy or intense immunosuppressive conditioning therapy.  The curative potential of allogeneic HCT is now partly attributed to the GVL or Graft-versus-Tumor effects of the newly transplanted donor cells to recognize and destroy malignant cells in the recipient patient.
The use of allogeneic HCT has grown substantially over the last decade due to advances in human immunogenetics, the establishment of unrelated donor programs, the use of cord blood as a source of hematopoietic stem cells and the advent of non-myeloablative conditioning regimens, or mini-transplants, that avoid the side effects of high-dose chemotherapy. Based on the latest statistics available, it is estimated that there are more than 10,000 allogeneic HCT procedures annually in the U.S. and a comparable number in Europe. Estimates as to the current annual rate of increase in these procedures are as high as 20%. High rates of morbidity and mortality occur in this patient population. Clinical trials are also underway testing allogeneic HCT for treatment of some metastatic solid tumors such as breast cancer, renal cell carcinoma, melanoma and ovarian cancer. Allogeneic transplantation has also been studied as a curative the rapy for several genetic disorders, including immunodeficiency syndromes, inborn errors of metabolism, and sickle cell disease. The primary toxicity of allogeneic HCT, however, is GVHD in which the newly transplanted donor cells damage cells in the recipient’s gastrointestinal tract, liver and skin.
Future Potential Indications of orBec® and oralOral BDP

Based on its pharmacological characteristics, orBec®/oral BDP may have utility in treating other conditions of the gastrointestinal tract having an inflammatory component. We have an issued U.S. patent 8,263,582 claiming the use of oral BDP as a method of treating inflammatory disorders, including Crohn’s disease, of the gastrointestinal tract and an issued U.S. patent 6,096,731 claiming the use of oral BDP as a method for preventing and treating the tissue damage that is associated with both GI GVHD following HCT, as well as GVHD which also occurs following organ allograft transplantation. We initiated a Phase 2 trialalso have European Patent EP 1392321 claiming the use of orBec®topically active corticosteroids in orally administered dosage forms that act concurrently to treat inflammation in the preventionupper and lower gastrointestinal tract and European patent EP 1830857 claiming oral BDP in conjunction with a short duration of acutehigh-dose prednisone with a rapid taper for the reduction of mortality associated with GVHD which has completed enrollment with results expectedand leukemia. We are planning for/pursuing development programs in the second halftreatment of 2010. We are targeting to begin a Phase 2 clinical trial inpediatric Crohn’s disease, acute radiation enteritis, chronic GI GVHD in the second half of 2010. In addition, weand GI ARS pending further grant funding. We are exploring the possibility of testing oral BDP (the active ingredient in orBec®) for local inflammation associated with Crohn’s Disease, Lymphocytic Colitis, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Ulcerative Colitis, among other indication s.indications.

SGX203 – Oral BDP for Treating Pediatric Crohn’s Disease

SGX203 is a two tablet delivery system of BDP specifically designed for oral use that allows for delivery of immediate and delayed release BDP throughout the small bowel and the colon. The FDA has awarded SGX203 Orphan Drug Designation for the treatment of pediatric Crohn's disease. We plan to initiate a Phase 2 clinical trial in pediatric Crohn’s disease in 2012.

About Pediatric Crohn's Disease

Crohn's disease is an ongoing disorder that causes inflammation of the GI tract. Crohn's disease can affect any area of the GI tract, from the mouth to the anus, but it most commonly affects the lower part of the small intestine, called the ileum. The swelling caused by the disease extends deep into the lining of the affected organ. The swelling can induce pain and can make the intestines empty frequently, resulting in diarrhea. Because the symptoms of Crohn's disease are similar to other intestinal disorders, such as irritable bowel syndrome and ulcerative colitis, it can be difficult to diagnose. People of Ashkenazy Jewish heritage have an increased risk of developing Crohn's disease.
 
SGX201- Time Release Formulation
- 16 -


Crohn's disease can appear at any age, but it is most often diagnosed in adults in their 20s and 30s. However, approximately 30% of people with Crohn's disease develop symptoms before 20 years of age. Pediatric Crohn's disease is a subpopulation of approximately 80,000 patients in the United States. Crohn’s disease tends to be both severe and extensive in the pediatric population and a relatively high proportion (25-40%) of pediatric Crohn’s patients have involvement of their upper gastrointestinal tract.

Crohn's disease presents special challenges for children and teens. In addition to bothersome and often painful symptoms, the disease can stunt growth, delay puberty, and weaken bones. Crohn's disease symptoms may sometimes prevent a child from participating in enjoyable activities. The emotional and psychological issues of living with a chronic disease can be especially difficult for young people.

SGX201 - Oral BDP for Preventing Acute Radiation Enteritis

SGX201 is a delayed-release formulation of BDP specifically designed for oral BDP
use. We have recently initiatedcompleted a Phase 1/2 clinical trial testing SGX201 in prevention of acute radiation enteritis. Patients with rectal cancer scheduled to undergo concurrent radiation and chemotherapy prior to surgery were randomized to one of four dose groups. The objectives of the study were to evaluate the safety and maximal tolerated dose of escalating doses of SGX201, as well as the preliminary efficacy of SGX201 for prevention of signs and symptoms of acute radiation enteritis. The study demonstrated that oral administration of SGX201 was safe and well tolerated across all four dose groups. There was also evidence of a potential dose response with respect to diarrhea, nausea and vomiting and the assessment of enteritis according to National Cancer Institute (“NCI”) Common Terminology Criteria for which weAdverse Events for selected gastrointestinal events. In addition, the incidence of diarrhea was lower than that seen in recent published historical control data in this patient population. This program was supported in part by a $500,000 two-year SBIR grant awarded by the NIH. These data are currently under review with our Radiation Enteritis medical advisory board to determine potential next steps forward with the clinical development program.

We have received “Fast Track” designation from the FDA.FDA for SGX201 for radiation enteritis. Fast Track is a designation that the FDA reserves for a drug intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition and one that demonstrates the potential to address an unmet medical need for the condition. Fast track designation is designed to facilitate the development and expedite the review of new drugs. For instance, should events warrant, we will be eligible to submit an NDAa New Drug Application (“NDA”) for SGX201 on a rolling basis, permitting the FDA to review sections of the NDA prior to receiving the complete submission. Additionally, NDAs for Fast Track development programs ordinarily will be eligible for priority review, which implies an abbreviated review time of six months.
SGX201 contains BDP, a highly potent, topically active corticosteroid that has a local effect on inflamed tissue. BDP has been marketed in the U.S. and worldwide since the early 1970s as the active pharmaceutical ingredient in inhalation products for the treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma. BDP is also the active ingredient in orBec®, currently in Phase 3 and Phase 2 development by Soligenix for the treatment and prevention of GI GVHD, respectively. SGX201 is a time-release formulation of BDP specifically designed for oral use.
Patients with rectal cancer who are scheduled to undergo concurrent radiation and chemotherapy prior to surgery will be enrolled in four dose groups. The objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety and maximal tolerated dose of escalating doses of SGX201, as well as the preliminary efficacy of SGX201 for prevention of signs and symptoms of acute radiation enteritis. This program is supported in part by a $500,000 two-year Small Business Innovation Research (“SBIR”) grant awarded by the NIH.

The study is expected to be completed in the first half of 2011.

About Acute Radiation Enteritis

External radiation therapy is used to treat most types of cancer, including cancer of the bladder, uterine, cervix, rectum, prostate, and vagina. During delivery of treatment, some level of radiation will also be delivered to healthy tissue, including the bowel, leading to acute and chronic toxicities. The large and small bowels are very sensitive to radiation and the larger the dose of radiation the greater the damage to normal bowel tissue. Radiation enteritis is a condition in which the lining of the bowel becomes swollen and inflamed during or after radiation therapy to the abdomen, pelvis, or rectum. Most tumors in the abdomen and pelvis need large doses, and almost all patients receiving radiation to the abdomen, pelvis, or rectum will show signs of acute enteritis.

Patients with acute enteritis may have nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and bleeding, among other symptoms. Some patients may develop dehydration and require hospitalization. With diarrhea, the gastrointestinal tract does not function normally, and nutrients such as fat, lactose, bile salts, and vitamin B12 are not well absorbed.

Symptoms will usually resolve within 2-6 weeks after therapy has ceased. Radiation enteritis is often not a self-limited illness, as over 80% of patients who receive abdominal radiation therapy complain of a persistent change in bowel habits. Moreover, acute radiation injury increases the risk of development of chronic radiation enteropathy, and overall 5% to 15% of the patients who receive abdominal or pelvic irradiation will develop chronic radiation enteritis.

There are over 100,000 patients annually in the U.S. who receive abdominal or pelvic external beam radiation treatment for cancer, and these patients are at risk of developing acute and chronic radiation enteritis.

LPMorBec®  – Oral BDP for Treating Chronic Gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host disease (GI GVHD)

orBec® is a two tablet delivery system of BDP specifically designed for oral use that allows for delivery of immediate and delayed release BDP to treat the gastrointestinal manifestation of chronic GVHD, the organ system where GVHD is most frequently encountered and highly problematic. orBec® is intended to reduce the need for systemic immunosuppressive drugs such as prednisone to treat chronic GI GVHD. The active ingredient in orBec® is BDP, a highly potent, topically active corticosteroid that has a local effect on inflamed tissue. BDP has been marketed in the US and worldwide since the early 1970s as the active pharmaceutical ingredient in a nasal spray and in a metered-dose inhaler for the treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma. In September 2012, we received a $300,000 two-year SBIR grant awarded by the NIH to support a Phase 2 study.

orBec® has been awarded orphan drug designations in the U.S. and in Europe for the treatment of GI GVHD.

About Chronic GVHD

GVHD is a major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. GVHD is an inflammatory disease initiated by T cells in the donor graft that recognize histocompatibility and other tissue antigens of the host, and is mediated by a variety of effector cells and inflammatory cytokines. GVHD presents in both acute and chronic forms. The symptoms of chronic GVHD typically present at between 100 days and three years post-transplant.

Chronic GVHD has features resembling autoimmune and other immunologic disorders such as scleroderma, Sjögren syndrome, primary biliary cirrhosis, wasting syndrome, bronchiolitis obliterans, immune cytopenias and chronic immunodeficiency. The manifestations of chronic GVHD may be restricted to a single organ or tissue or may be widespread. Chronic GVHD can lead to debilitating consequences, e.g., joint contractures, loss of sight, end-stage lung disease, or mortality resulting from profound chronic immune suppression leading to recurrent or life-threatening infections.

Treatment of chronic GVHD is a challenge because it can be refractory to frontline immunosuppression.  High-dose systemic corticosteroids are used with some success but carry significant toxicity. The risks of prolonged immunosuppression include local and disseminated infections, Epstein-Barr virus associated lymphoproliferative disease, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (“HPA”) axis suppression, myopathy, glucose intolerance, neuropsychiatric disease and bone demineralization.

LPM™ – Leuprolide for Treating Endometriosis and Prostate Cancer

Our Lipid Polymer Micelle (“LPM™”) oral drug delivery system is a proprietary platform technology designed to allow for the oral administration of peptide drugs that are water-soluble but poorly permeable through the gastrointestinal tract. We have previously demonstrated in pre-clinical animal models that the LPM™ technology is adaptable to oral delivery of peptide drugs and that high systemic levels after intestinal absorption can be achieved with the peptide hormone drug leuprolide. The LPM™ system utilizes a lipid based delivery system that can incorporate the peptide of interest in a thermodynamically stable configuration called a “reverse micelle” that, through oral administration, can promote intestinal absorption. Reverse micelles are structures that form when certain classes of lipids come in contact with small amounts of water. This results in a drug delivery system in which a stable clear dispersion of the water soluble drug can be evenly dispersed within the lipid phase. LPM™ is thought to promote intestinal absorption due to the ability of the micelles to open up small channels through the epithelial layer of the intestines that allow only molecules of a certain dimension to pass through while excluding extremely large molecules such as bacteria and viruses. The reverse micelles also structurally prevent the rapid inactivation of peptides by enzymes in the upper gastrointestinal tract via a non-specific enzyme inhibition by surfactant(s) in the formulation.

In pre-clinical studies, the LPM™ delivery technology significantly enhanced the ability of leuprolide to pass through the intestinal epithelium in comparison to leuprolide alone. Leuprolide is a synthetic peptide agonist of gonadotropin releasing hormone, which is used in the treatment of prostate cancer in men and endometriosis in women. Leuprolide exhibits poor intestinal absorption from an aqueous solution with the oral bioavailability being less than 5%. Utilizing LPM™ in rats and dogs, the bioavailability of leuprolide averaged 30% compared to 2.2% for the control oral solution. Based on these promising pre-clinical data, we anticipate preparing for a Phase 1 study in humans to confirm these findings.findings, pending further funding.
 

An oral version of leuprolide may provide a significant advantage over the currently marketed “depot” formulations. Leuprolide is one of the most widely used anti-cancer agents for advanced prostate cancer in men. Injectable forms of leuprolide marketed under trade names such as Lupron®Lupron® and Eligard®Eligard® had worldwide annual sales of more than $1 billion in recent years. Injectable leuprolide is also widely used in non-cancer indications, such as endometriosis in women (a common condition in which cells normally found in the uterus become implanted in other areas of the body), uterine fibroids in women (noncancerous growths in the uterus) and central precocious puberty in children (a condition causing children to enter puberty too soon). Leuprolide is currently available only in injectable, injectable depot and subcutaneous implant routes of delivery which limits its use and utility.

Vaccines/BioDefense Overview

ThermoVax™ – Thermostability Technology

Soligenix’s thermostability technology, ThermoVax™, is a novel method of rendering aluminum salt (known colloquially as Alum) adjuvanted vaccines stable at elevated temperatures. Alum is the most widely employed adjuvant technology in the vaccine industry. The value of ThermoVax™ lies in its potential ability to eliminate the need for cold-chain production, transportation, and storage for Alum adjuvanted vaccines. This would relieve companies of the high costs of producing and maintaining vaccines under refrigerated conditions. The World Health Organization (“WHO”) reports that 50% of all vaccines around the world are wasted due to thermostability issues. This is due to the fact that most Alum adjuvanted vaccines need to be maintained at between 2 and 8 degrees Celsius (“C”) and even brief excursions from this temperature range (especially below freezing) usually necessitates the destruction of the product or the initiation of costly stability programs specific for the vaccine lots in question. The savings realized from the elimination of cold chain costs and related product losses would in turn significantly increase the profitability of vaccine products. Elimination of the cold chain would also further facilitate the use of these vaccines in the lesser developed parts of the world. On the Vaccines/BioDefense side, ThermoVax™ has the potential to facilitate easier storage and distribution of strategic national stockpile vaccines in emergency settings.

Initial proof-of-concept preclinical studies with ThermoVax™ indicate that it is able to produce stable vaccine formulations using adjuvants, protein immunogens, and other components that ordinarily would not withstand long temperature variations exceeding customary refrigerated storage conditions. These studies were conducted with Soligenix’s aluminum-adjuvanted ricin toxin vaccine, RiVax™, made under precise lyophilization conditions using excipients that aid in maintaining native protein structure of the ricin A chain, the immunogenic compound of the vaccine. When RiVax™ was kept at 40 degrees C for over three months, all of the animals vaccinated with the lyophilized RiVax™ vaccine developed potent and high titer neutralizing antibodies. Confirmatory results have extended the stability to more than three months when the vaccine is kept at 40 degrees C. In contrast, animals that were vaccinated with the liquid RiVax™ vaccine kept at 40 degrees C did not develop neutralizing antibodies and were not protected against ricin exposure. The ricin A chain is extremely sensitive to temperature and rapidly loses the ability to induce neutralizing antibodies when exposed to temperatures higher than 8 degrees C.

Near term progress with ThermoVax™ will allow Soligenix to seek out potential partnerships with companies marketing FDA/ex-U.S. health authority approved Alum adjuvanted vaccines that are interested in eliminating the need for cold chain for their products. ThermoVax™ will further enable Soligenix to expand its vaccine development expertise beyond biodefense into the infectious disease space and also has the potential to allow for the development of multivalent vaccines (e.g., combination ricin-anthrax vaccine).

ThermoVax™ is the subject of U.S. patent application number 60/896,429 filed on March 22, 2007 entitled “Method of Preparing an Immunologically-Active Adjuvant-Bound Dried Vaccine Composition.” This patent and its corresponding foreign filings are pending and licensed to Soligenix by the University of Colorado and they address the use of adjuvants in conjunction with vaccines that are formulated to resist thermal inactivation. The license agreement covers thermostable vaccines for biodefense as well as other potential vaccine indications.

RiVax™ – Ricin Toxin Vaccine

RiVax™ is our proprietary vaccine developed to protect against exposure to ricin toxin, and is the first and onlyricin. With RiVax™, Soligenix is a world leader in ricin toxin vaccine to be clinically testedresearch. The immunogen in RiVax™ induces a protective immune response in animal models of ricin exposure and functionally active antibodies in humans. RicinThe immunogen consists of a genetically inactivated subunit ricin A chain that is enzymatically inactive and lacks residual toxicity of the holotoxin. One Phase 1 human clinical trial was completed, and a recombinant derivativesecond trial is currently being conducted. The development of RiVax™ has been sponsored through a series of overlapping challenge grants, UC1, and cooperative grants, U01, from the NIH, granted to Soligenix and to the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (“UTSW”) where the vaccine originated. The second clinical trial is being supported by a grant from the FDA's Office of Orphan Products to UTSW. Soligenix and UTSW have collectively received approximately $15 million in grant funding from the NIH for RiVax™. Results of the first Phase 1 human trial of RiVax™ established that the immunogen was safe and induced antibodies anticipated to protect humans from ricin exposure. The antibodies generated from vaccination, concentrated and purified, were capable of conferring immunity passively to recipient animals, indicating that the vaccine was capable of inducing functionally active antibodies in humans. The outcome of the study was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Vitetta et al., 2006, PNAS, 105:2268-2273). The second trial, sponsored by UTSW, is currently evaluating a more potent formulation of RiVax™ that contains a conventional adjuvant (salts of aluminum), anticipated to result in higher antibody titers of longer duration in human subjects. This trial is expected to complete in the 2H 2012. Soligenix has adapted the original manufacturing process for the immunogen contained in RiVax™ for large scale manufacturing and is further establishing correlates of the human immune response in non-human primates.

RiVax™ is the subject of three issued U.S. patent numbers 6,566,500, 6,960,652, and 7,829,668, all entitled "Compositions and methods for modifying toxic effects of proteinaceous compounds." This patent family includes composition of matter claims for the modified ricin toxin A chain which is the immunogen contained in RiVax™, and issued in 2003, 2005 and 2010 respectively. The initial filing date of these patents is March 2000 and they are expected to expire in March 2020. The issued patents contain claims that describe alteration of sequences within the ricin A chain that affect vascular leak, one of the deadly toxicities caused by ricin toxin. Another U.S. patent number 7,175,848 entitled “Ricin A chain mutants lacking enzymatic activity as vaccines to protect against aerosolized ricin,” was filed in October of 2000 and a potent glycoproteinis expected to expire in October 2020. RiVax™ has also been granted Orphan Drug Designation by the FDA for the prevention of ricin intoxication.

About Ricin Toxin
Ricin toxin derived from the beans of castor plants. It can be cheaply and easily produced, is stable over long periods of time, is toxic by several routes of exposure and thus has the potential to be used as a biological weapon against military and/or civilian targets. As a bioterrorism agent, ricin could be disseminated as an aerosol, by injection, or as a food supply contaminant. The potential use of ricin toxin as a biological weapon of mass destruction has been highlighted in a Federal Bureau of Investigations Bioterror report released in November 2007 entitled Terrorism 2002-2005, which states that "Ricin“Ricin and the bacterial agent anthrax are emerging as the most prevalent agents involved in WMD investigations"investigations” (http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terror/terrorism2002_2005.pdfterrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05.pdf). The Centers for Disease Control (“CDC”) has classified ricin toxin as a Category B biological agent. Ricin works by first binding to glycoproteins found on the exterior of a cell, and then entering the cell and inhibiting protein synthesis leading to cell death. Once exposed to ricin toxin, there is no effective therapy available to reverse the course of the toxin. Currently, there is no FDA approved vaccine to protect against the possibility of ricin toxin being used in a terrorist attack, or its use as a weapon on the battlefield, nor is there a known antidote for ricin toxin exposure.

The initial Phase 1 clinical trialVeloThrax™ – Anthrax Vaccine

VeloThrax™ is Soligenix’s newly acquired proprietary vaccine based on a recombinant Protective Antigen (rPA) derivative intended for use against anthrax. Soligenix has entered into an exclusive license option with Harvard College to license VeloThrax™ (also known as DNI for dominant negative inhibitor). VeloThrax™ is a translocation-deficient mutant of RiVax ™ was conductedPA with double mutations of K397D and D425K that impede the conformational changes necessary for endosomal membrane translocation into the cell cytoplasm. In the absence of that PA translocation step, anthrax toxin trafficking and function cease. VeloThrax™ is also considered a more immunogenic candidate than native rPA. This apparent increase in immunogenicity suggests that the DNI rPA is processed and presented to the immune system more efficiently by Dr. Ellen Vitetta at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (“UTSW”) at Dallas, Soligenix's academic partner. The trial demonstrated that RiVax™cellular antigen processing pathways, which is well tolerated and induces antibodies in humans that neutralize the ricin toxin. The functional activityconsistent with known properties of the antibodies was confirmed by animal challenge studies in mice which survived exposure to ricin toxin after being injected with serum samples from the volunteers. The outcome of the study was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. A second Phase 1 trial supported by a grant to UTSW is currently underway utilizing an adjuvanted formulation of RiVax™ and is expected to complete in the second half of 2010.molecule.
 
The National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) has previously awarded us two grants: one for $6.4 million and one for $5.2 million for a total of $11.6 million for the development of RiVax™ covering process development, scale-up and current Good Manufacturing Practice (“cGMP”) manufacturing, and pre-clinical toxicology testing pursuant to the FDA’s “animal rule,” which has supported our research from 2004 to present.
On September 21, 2009, we announced that we were awarded a $9.4 Million grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”), a division of the NIH.  The grant will fund, over a five-year period, the development of formulation and manufacturing processes for vaccines,  including RiVaxTM, that are stable at elevated temperatures.  The grant will also fund the development of improved thermostable adjuvants expected to result in rapidly acting vaccines that can be given with fewer injections over shorter intervals. The development of heat-stable vaccines will take advantage of combining several novel formulation processes with well characterized adjuvants that have been evaluated in numerous va ccine field trials.  The formulation and process technology funded by the grant will be applied to the further development of RiVaxTM, a subunit vaccine for prevention of ricin toxin lethality and morbidity.  The grant will also address the development of manufacturing processes and animal model systems necessary for the pre-clinical characterization of vaccine formulations.  Further, the grant will fund the concurrent development of at least one other protein subunit vaccine, which is currently expected to be an anthrax vaccine.  This could lead to new subunit vaccines that would bypass current cold chain requirements for storage and distribution.  Vaccines to be stored in the Strategic National Stockpile (“SNS”) and used under emergency situations for biodefense are expected to have long-term shelf life.

On April 29, 2008, we announced the initiation of a comprehensive program to evaluate the efficacy of RiVax™ in non-human primates. This study is taking place at the Tulane University Health Sciences Center and will provide data that will further aid in the interpretation of immunogenicity data obtained in the human vaccination trials.


SGX202DNI versions of rPA such as VeloThrax™ are also capable of inducing antibodies that neutralize the activity of the anthrax toxin complex. Unlike fully-functional rPA, VeloThrax™ might be given to a patient post-exposure without risk of enhancing intoxication during an infection, although clinical tests involving intravenous administration of potentially therapeutic levels of DNI rPA resulted in serious adverse events and so further development of this product as a therapeutic biological for blocking the effects of infection by B. anthracis was discontinued. Soligenix intends to test VeloThrax™ at a 1,000 fold lower dose than previously tested for an intramuscular or intradermal vaccine.

Initial development work on VeloThrax™ has begun and will be conducted pursuant to Soligenix’s $9.4 million NIAID grant enabling development of thermo-stable ricin and anthrax vaccines. VeloThrax™’s greater immunogenicity could lead to a vaccine that can be administered in the fewest possible doses to induce the highest level of toxin neutralizing antibodies. Utilizing ThermoVax™, Soligenix believes that it will be able to develop VeloThrax™ into a vaccine with an improved stability profile, an issue that has proven challenging in the development of other anthrax vaccines. Extended stability at ambient temperatures would be a significant improvement for stockpiled vaccines and one which is not expected from conventional vaccines. Further, a large-scale, cGMP production methodology has already been completed. Assuming long-term stability can be met; VeloThrax™ could be stockpiled for general prophylactic as well as a post exposure use.

The overall objective of the VeloThrax™ program is to rapidly and efficiently develop a next generation anthrax vaccine which combines a well established, safe and relatively low risk vaccine development and dosing approach with targeted, proven innovative strategies. VeloThrax™ will potentially be a combination of a stable, readily manufactured mutant rPA subunit antigen with next generation, clinically compatible adjuvants from Infectious Disease Research Institute (“IDRI”) which have been demonstrated to enhance potency and reduce the time and number of vaccine doses required to achieve protective titer using a variety of vaccine antigens. This blend of proven yet innovative technologies will provide the Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (“PHEMCE”) and the Department of Defense (“DoD”) with a safe and stable alternative to the existing licensed anthrax vaccine product. Soligenix also proposes to adapt newly developed glassification technology (initially developed under an ongoing NIAID grant to stabilize exceptionally unstable ricin toxin/adjuvant formulations) to enable a thermostable, dried, single vial, pre-formulated adjuvanted rPA vaccine which is suitable for both long term storage and field use without typical cold chain constraints.

About Anthrax

Anthrax is an acute infectious disease that is easily transmitted to humans by environmentally durable spores that are produced by Bacillus anthracis. Because the spores are robust and contagious, anthrax is considered a Category A bioterror threat. Anthrax infection can occur in three forms: cutaneous (skin), inhalation, and gastrointestinal. Inhaled spores can cause a rapidly progressing form of anthrax since the spores are transported to lymph nodes near the lungs where they germinate, releasing vegetative bacteria into the bloodstream. Bacteria synthesize a complex series of toxin components that make up anthrax toxin, resulting in overwhelming toxemia that causes shock and organ failure. Treatment of anthrax involves long-term antibiotic therapy, since ungerminated spores can lie dormant in the lungs for up to 60 days. Only a few inhaled spores can cause inhalational anthrax. Once the toxin has entered the bloodstream, antibiotics are ineffective, and only toxin-specific therapy is effective. Passively transferred antibodies can neutralize anthrax toxins and can be used post-exposure in conjunction with antibiotics. Because of the long residence time of spores in the lung, it is possible to vaccinate post-exposure, but the onset of neutralizing antibodies must occur during the period of antibiotic therapy.

OrbeShield™ – Oral BDP for GIGastrointestinal Acute Radiation InjurySyndrome (GI ARS)

On September 12, 2007, we announced that our academic partner,OrbeShield™ (an oral immediate and delayed release formulation of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (“FHCRC”), received a $1 million grant from the NIH to conduct pre-clinical studies of oral beclomethasone dipropionate (oral BDP, also thetopically active ingredient in orBec®)corticosteroid BDP) is being developed for the treatment of GI radiation injury. While we will not receive any monetary benefit from this grant, we will benefit if this workARS. Corticosteroids are the best understood and most widely used class of anti-inflammatory drugs. BDP is successfula corticosteroid with predominantly topical activity that is approved for use in asthma, psoriasis and it will enhance the valueallergic rhinitis.

OrbeShield™ has demonstrated positive preclinical results in a canine GI ARS model which indicate that dogs treated with OrbeShield™ demonstrated statistically significant (p=0.04) improvement in survival with dosing at either 2 hours or 24 hours after exposure to lethal doses of the studies funded by the grant, entitled “Improving Gastrointestinal Recovery after Radiation,” istotal body irradiation (“TBI”) when compared to evaluate the ability of three promising clinical-grade drugs, including oral BDP, given alone or in combination, that are likelycontrol dogs. OrbeShield™ appears to significa ntlysignificantly mitigate the damage to the gastrointestinalGI epithelium caused by exposure to high doses of radiation using a well-established dog model. canine model of GI ARS.

The GI tract is highly sensitive to ionizing radiation and the destruction of epithelial tissue is one of the first effects of radiation exposure. The rapid loss of epithelial cells leads to inflammation and infection that are often the primary cause of death in acute radiation injury. This concept of GI damage also applies to clinical setting of oncology, where high doses of radiation cannot be administered effectively to the abdomen because radiation is very toxic to the intestines. This is the same type of toxicity that occurs in radiation-induced GI ARS. As a result, there is a dual avenue of development for Soligenix, and OrbeShield™ is potentially a “dual use” compound, a desirable characteristic which is a specific priority of Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority(“BARDA”) for ARS and other medical countermeasure indications.

The application of OrbeShield™ to acute GI ARS originated from other programs for oral BDP and is based on the properties of BDP to act locally in the GI to modulate local inflammation and epithelial cellular apoptosis. Development of OrbeShield™ for GI ARS is a natural extension of Soligenix’s radiation enteritis clinical program with SGX201. Killing cancer cells with radiation therapy if successful, would benefit cancer patients undergoing radiation,or chemotherapy or victimsmust be done in ways that minimize toxicity to the rest of nuclear-terrorism.the body, but often leads to an inflammatory condition in the GI tract when administered in that general vicinity. In most radiation scenarios, injury to the hematopoietic (blood) system and GI tract are the main determinants of survival.

Previously, development of OrbeShield™ had been largely supported by a $1 million NIH grant to Soligenix’s academic partner, the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. In July 2012, the Company received a SBIR grant from NIAID of approximately $600,000 to support further preclinical development of OrbeShield™ for the treatment of acute GI ARS.

About GI ARS
The potential occurrence of industrial radiation accidents and the threat of terrorist events involving radioactive material mandate the development and implementation of effective treatments of radiation injury. The GI tract is highly sensitive to radiation damage. Substantial injury to the GI tract after radiation exposure results in death. In most radiation scenarios, injury to the hematopoietic system and gastrointestinal tract are the main determinants of survival. The studies will compare overall survivalThere is an urgent need to develop specific countermeasures against the lethality caused by intestinal exposure to radiation and markersagainst the pathophysiological manifestations of intestinal cell regeneration when the drug regimens are added to supportive care intended to boost proliferation of blood cells. The principal investigator of the study is George E. Georges, M.D., Associate Member of the FHCRC. Our rights to the use of SGX202 are through our license with George McDonald.radiation-induced gastrointestinal injury.

The Drug Approval Process

Before marketing, each of our products must undergo an extensive regulatory approval process conducted by the FDA and applicable agencies in other countries. Testing, manufacturing, commercialization, advertising, promotion, export and marketing, among other things, of the proposed products are subject to extensive regulation by government authorities in the U.S. and other countries. All products must go through a series of tests, including advanced human clinical trials, which the FDA is allowed to suspend as it deems necessary to protect the safety of subjects.patients.

 
Our products will require regulatory clearance by the FDA and by comparable agencies in other countries, prior to commercialization. The nature and extent of regulation differs with respect to different products. In order to test, produce and market certain therapeutic products in the U.S., mandatory procedures and safety standards, approval processes, manufacturing and marketing practices established by the FDA must be satisfied.

An Investigational New Drug (“IND”)IND application is required before human clinical testing in the U.S. of a new drug compound or biological product can commence. The IND application includes results of pre-clinical animal studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of the drug and a detailed description of the clinical investigations to be undertaken.

Clinical trials are normally done in three phases, although the phases may overlap. Phase 1 trials are smaller trials concerned primarily with metabolism and pharmacologic actions of the drug and with the safety of the product. Phase 2 trials are designed primarily to demonstrate effectiveness and safety in treating the disease or condition for which the product is indicated. These trials typically explore various doses and regimens. Phase 3 trials are expanded clinical trials intended to gather additional information on safety and effectiveness needed to clarify the product’s benefit-risk relationship and generate information for proper labeling of the drug, among other things. The FDA receives reports on the progress of each phase of clinical testing and may require the modification, suspension or termination of clinical trials if an unwarranted risk is presented to patients. When data is required from long-term use of a drug following its approval and initial marketing, the FDA can require Phase 4, or post-marketing, studies to be conducted.


With certain exceptions, once successful clinical testing is completed, the sponsor can submit an NDA for approval of a drug. The process of completing clinical trials for a new drug is likely to take a number of years and require the expenditure of substantial resources. Furthermore, the FDA or any foreign health authority may not grant an approval on a timely basis, if at all. The FDA may deny the approval of an NDA, in its sole discretion, if it determines that its regulatory criteria have not been satisfied or may require additional testing or information. Among the conditions for marketing approval is the requirement that the prospective manufacturer’s quality control and manufacturing procedures conform to good manufacturing practice regulations. In complying with standards contained in these regulations, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the area of production, quality control and quality assurance to ensure full technical compliance. Manufacturing facilities, both foreign and domestic, also are subject to inspections by, or under the authority of, the FDA and by other federal, state, local or foreign agencies.
 

Even after initial FDA or foreign health authority approval has been obtained, further studies, including Phase 4 post-marketing studies, may be required to provide additional data on safety and will be required to gain approval for the marketing of a product as a treatment for clinical indications other than those for which the product was initially tested. Also, the FDA or foreign regulatory authority will require post-marketing reporting to monitor the side effects of the drug. Results of post-marketing programs may limit or expand the further marketing of the products. Further, if there are any modifications to the drug, including any change in indication, manufacturing process, labeling or manufacturing facility, an application seeking approval of such changes will likely be required to be submitted to the FDA or foreign regulator yregulatory authority.
 
In the U.S., the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Public Health Service Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and other federal and state statutes and regulations govern or influence the research, testing, manufacture, safety, labeling, storage, record keeping, approval, advertising and promotion of drug, biological, medical device and food products. Noncompliance with applicable requirements can result in, among other things, fines, recall or seizure of products, refusal to permit products to be imported into the U.S., refusal of the government to approve product approval applications or to allow the Company to enter into government supply contracts, withdrawal of previously approved applications and criminal prosecution. The FDA may also assess civil penalties for violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act invol vinginvolving medical devices.

For the development of biodefense vaccines, such as RiVaxTMRiVax™, the FDA has instituted policies that are expected to result in shorter pathways to market. This potentially includes approval for commercial use usingutilizing the results of animal efficacy trials, rather than efficacy trials in humans. However, the Company will still have to establish that the vaccine and countermeasures it is developing are safe in humans at doses that are correlated with the beneficial effect in animals. Such clinical trials will also have to be completed in distinct populations that are subject to the countermeasures; for instance, the very young and the very old, and in pregnant women, if the countermeasure is to be licensed for civilian use. Other agencies will have an influence over the benefit-risk scenarios for deploying the countermeasures and in establishing the number of doses utilized in the Strategic National Stockpile. We may not be able to sufficiently demonstrate the animal correlation to the satisfaction of the FDA, as these correlates are difficult to establish and are often unclear. Invocation of the animal rule may raise issues of confidence in the model systems even if the models have been validated. For many of the biological threats, the animal models are not available and the Company may have to develop the animal models, a time-consuming research effort. There are few historical precedents, or recent precedents, for the development of new countermeasure for bioterrorism agents. Despite the Animal Rule, the FDA may require large clinical trials to establish safety and immunogenicity before licensure and it may require safety and immunogenicity trials in additional populations. Approval of biodefense products may be subject to post-marketing studies, and cou ldcould be restricted in use in only certain populations.
 

Marketing Strategies
 
Pursuant to the collaboration and supply agreement with Sigma-Tau, we granted an exclusive license to Sigma-Tau to commercialize orBec® in the U.S., Canada, Mexico and Mexico.

We are actively seeking a commercialization partner for orBec® and oral BDP outside of North America as well as for our LPMTM – Leuprolide program.Europe.

We have had and are having strategic discussions with a number of pharmaceutical companies regarding the partnering or sale of our biodefense vaccine products. We may market our biodefense vaccine products directly to government agencies. We believe that both military and civilian health authorities of the U.S. and other countries will increase their stockpiling of therapeutics and vaccines to treat and prevent diseases and conditions that could ensue following a bioterrorism attack.
 
Competition
 
Our competitors are pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, most of whom have considerably greater financial, technical, and marketing resources than we currently have. Another source of competing technologies is universities and other research institutions, including the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, and we face competition from other companies to acquire rights to those technologies.

orBec®Oral BDP Competition

There are currently 41 compounds either on the market or in clinical development for Crohn’s disease of which 14 are biologics, 6 immunomodulators, 3 cell-based therapies, 2 steroids, 2 anti-inflammatory, 2 5-ASAs, 1 antibiotic, and 11 other that are unclassified. In the U.S., there are 24 compounds on market or in development including 4 compounds in Phase 3.

There are 4 compounds currently in development or on the market specifically for pediatric Crohn’s disease. Of these, Remicade (infliximab) is the only compound currently with an indication in pediatric Crohn’s disease. There are two other marketed biologics, Cimzia (certolizumab) and Tysabri (natalizumab), in Phase 2 for pediatric Crohn’s. Entocort (budesonide) is also currently in Phase 3 trials in pediatric Crohn’s disease. We believe that SGX203’s unique release characteristics, intended to deliver topically active therapy to both the upper and lower gastrointestinal systems, should make SGX203 an attractive alternative to existing therapies for inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.

Competition is also intense in the gastroenterology and transplant areas. Companies are attempting to develop technologies to treat GVHD by suppressing the immune system through various mechanisms. Some companies, including Sangstat,Osiris, Abgenix, and PDL BioPharma, Inc., are developing monoclonal antibodies to treat GVHD. Novartis, Medimmune, and Ariad are developing both gene therapy products and small molecules to treat GVHD. All of these products are in various stages of development. For example, Novartis currently markets Cyclosporin, and Sangstat currently markets Thymoglobulin for transplant-related therapeutics. We face potential competition from Osiris Therapeutics if its product Prochymal for the treatment of GVHD is successful in reaching the market. Kiadis Pharma is also developing products for the treatment of GVHD. In ad dition,addition, there are investigator-sponsored clinical trials exploring the use of approved drugs such as Enbrel®Enbrel®, which has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, in the treatment of GVHD.  We believe that orBec®’s unique release characteristics, intended to deliver topically active therapy to both the upper and lower gastrointestinal systems, should make orBec® an attractive alternative to existing therapies for inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.

Competition is also intense in the therapeutic area of inflammatory bowel disease. Several companies, including Centocor, Immunex, and Celgene, have products that are currently FDA approved. For example, Centocor, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, markets the drug product RemicadeTM for Crohn’s disease. Other drugs used to treat inflammatory bowel disease include another oral locally active corticosteroid called budesonide, which is being marketed by AstraZeneca in Europe and Canada and by Prometheus Pharmaceuticals in the U.S. under the tradename of Entocort®. Entocort® is structurally similar to beclomethasone dipropionate, and the FDA-approved Entocort for Crohn’s disease late in 2001. In addition, Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. markets an FDA-approved therapy for ulcerative colitis called Colazal®.Additionally, Chiesi Pharmaceuticals (“Chiesi”) markets in certain countries in Europe a delayed-release oral formulation of beclomethasone dipropionate, the active ingredient of orBec®orBec®, called CLIPPERTM for ulcerative colitis and may seek marketing approval in Italy and other European countries. In the U.S., Eurand N.V. (“Eurand”) has licenses from Chiesi to the same formulation as CLIPPERTM and is developing itCLIPPER™ for ulcerative colitis. Eurand has also received Orphan Drug Designation for the compound in pediatric ulcerative colitis patients.
ThermoVax™ Competition

SeveralMultiple groups and companies are working to address the unmet need of vaccine thermostability using a variety of technologies. In addition, both non-governmental organizations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and PATH, as well as academic organizations such as the Kansas University Macromolecular and Vaccine Stabilization Center have also established various colonic drug delivery systemsprograms designed to deliver therapeutic drugs to the colon for treatment of Crohn’s disease. These companies include Ivax Corporation, Inkine Pharmaceutical Corporation, and Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Other approaches to treat gastrointestinal disorders include antisense and gene therapy. Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is in the process of developing antisense therapy to treat Crohn’s disease.
advance technologies which may address this need.
 

The majority of stabilization technologies currently being developed involve mixing vaccine antigen +/- adjuvant with various proprietary excipients or co-factors that either serve to stabilize the vaccine or biological product in a liquid or dried (lyophilized) form. Examples of these approaches include the use of various plant-derived sugars and macromolecules being developed by companies such as Stabilitech and synthetic polymers such as Pluronic F127 (Endo Pharmaceuticals under Gates Foundation funding). VBI (Variation Biotechnologies, Inc) intends to employ a lipid system (resembling liposomes) to stabilize viral antigens, including virus-like particles (VLPs), and apply it to a conventional influenza vaccine among others

Other approaches involve process variations to freeze-dry live virus vaccines. For example, PaxVax intends to employ a spray drying technology in concert with enteric coating to achieve formulations for room temperature stability of live virus vaccines using adenovirus vectors. VBI has the capacity to utilize their proprietary stabilization technology for a number of vaccines (as a co-development service, similar to the business model being developed by Stabilitech), whereas PaxVax is applying the technology to their own proprietary vaccine development programs. Stabilitech uses combinations of excipients, which include glassifying sugars similar to the ThermoVax™ technology, and variations in drying cycles during lyophilization, as does the ThermoVax™ technology. Another Soligenix competitor, Endo Pharmaceuticals is working to identify Pluronic polymer-based formulations that stabilize measles and hepatitis B vaccines from -10°C to 45°C.

Additionally, companies like Pharmathene, Panacea Biotech, and Compass Biotech are developing proprietary vaccines with the application of some form of stabilization technology.
Vaccines/BioDefense Vaccine Competition
 
We face competition in the area of biodefense vaccinesproduct development from various public and private companies, universities and governmental agencies, such as the U.S. Army, some of whom may have their own proprietary technologies which may directly compete with the our technologies. Acambis,

The currently available anthrax vaccine known as BioThrax® (Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed or AVA) marketed by Emergent BioSolutions, Inc. was developed nearly 50 years ago from a culture filtrate derived from anthrax bacteria. Consequently, it contains a number of different proteins, some of which are believed to potentially contribute to the adverse events that have been reported in the literature (up to 7-8% serious adverse events) and which prompted agencies like the Institute of Medicine to recommend adoption of newer and safer anthrax vaccines. BioThrax® is FDA approved for the prevention of anthrax infection, but requires five doses over a period of eighteen months to achieve protective immunity.

With respect to the development of PA-based vaccines and therapeutics such as VeloThrax™, there are a number of other companies in preclinical and clinical development including Emergent, Pharmathene, Dynavax, Emergent Biosolutions (formerly Bioport Corporation), VaxGen, Inc., Chimerix, Inc.,Panacea Biotech, Paxvax, Elusys, and Pfenex.

Cangene is currently developing an anthrax immune globulin therapeutic based on plasma collected from military personnel who have been vaccinated with BioThrax®. Human Genome Sciences is developing a monoclonal antibody to Bacillus anthracis, referred to as ABthrax™, as a post-exposure therapeutic for anthrax infection. Elusys Therapeutics is developing a monoclonal antibody to Bacillus anthracis, known as Anthim™, as a pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis against anthrax infection, as well as an active treatment of disease. Pharmathene and Medarex are collaborating to develop a human antibody to anthrax, known as Valortim™. Bavarian Nordic is developing a multivalent combination vaccine against both anthrax and smallpox.

The only potential competition to RiVax™ is being developed by the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID), the DoD’s lead laboratory for medical research to counter biological threats. Development of this product, known as RVEc™, is proceeding under a program led by Dr. Len Smith, who has been working for many years to develop a ricin vaccine candidate. Similar to RiVax™, RVEc™ has been shown to be fully protective in mice exposed to lethal doses of ricin toxin by the aerosol route. Further studies, in both rabbits and nonhuman primates, were successfully conducted to evaluate RVEc™’s safety as well as its immunogenicity.

In the area of radiation-protective antidotes such as OrbeShield™, various companies, such as Cleveland Biolabs, Aeolus Pharmaceuticals, Boulder Biotechnology, RxBio, Inc., ColeyExponential Biotherapies Inc., Osiris Therapeutics, Inc., ImmuneRegen BioSciences, Inc., Neumedicines, Inc., Cellerant Therapeutics, Onconova Therapeutics, Inc., Araim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AvanirEVA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Terapio, Cangene Corporation, Humanetics Corporation and the University of Arkansas Medical Sciences Center are developing biopharmaceutical products that may directly compete with OrbeShield™, Dynport Vaccine Company, LLC., Pharmathene, SIGA Pharmaceuticalseven though their approaches to such treatment are different.

Only RxBio and othersthe University of Arkansas have announced vaccineprograms specifically for GI ARS. RxBio’s Rx100 is a stem cell protectant designed as a single dose (oral or countermeasureinjection) which has shown promise in nonhuman primate studies. Pasireotide, a drug in development programsby Novartis for biodefense. SomeCushing’s disease, is being developed at the University of these companies have substantially greater human and financial resources than we do, and many of them have already received grants or government contractsArkansas to develop anti-toxins and vaccines against bioterrorism. For example, Avecia Biotechnology, Inc. has received NIH contracts to develop a next generation injectable anthrax vaccine. VaxGen received an approximately $900 million procurement order fromprotect the U.S. government to produce and deliver 75 million doses of Anthrax vaccine. This contract was rescinded in January 2007intestine by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) because of the inability of Vaxgen to enter into Phase 2 clinical trials according to contract timelines. Several companies have received development grants from the NIH for biodefense products. For example, Coley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has received a $6 million Department of Defense (“DOD”) grant to develop vaccine enhancement technology. Dynport Vaccine Company, LLC, a prime contractor with the DOD, currently has a $200 million contract to develop vaccines for the U.S. military, including a multivalent botulinum toxin vaccine. Although we have received significant grant funding to date for product development, we have not yet been obtained contract awards for government procurement of products.reducing pancreatic secretions that exacerbate intestinal inflammation.

Patents and Other Proprietary Rights

Our goal is to obtain, maintain and enforce patent protection for our products, formulations, processes, methods and other proprietary technologies, preserve our trade secrets, and operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of other parties, both in the U.S. and in other countries. Our policy is to actively seek to obtain, where appropriate, the broadest intellectual property protection possible for our product candidates, proprietary information and proprietary technology through a combination of contractual arrangements and patents, both in the U.S. and elsewhere in the world.

We also depend upon the skills, knowledge and experience of our scientific and technical personnel, as well as that of our advisors, consultants and other contractors, none of which is patentable. To help protect our proprietary knowledge and experience that is not patentable, and for inventions for which patents may be difficult to enforce, we rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect our interests. To this end, we require all employees, consultants, advisors and other contractors to enter into confidentiality agreements, which prohibit the disclosure of confidential information and, where applicable, require disclosure and assignment to us of the ideas, developments, discoveries and inventions important to our business.

We are the exclusive licensee of an issued U.S. patentpatents 8,263,582 and 6,096,731 that coverscover the use of orBec®oral BDP for treating inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract and the prevention and treatment of GI GVHD.GVHD, respectively. We also have European patent EP 1392321 claiming the use of topically active corticosteroids in orally administered dosage forms that act concurrently to treat inflammation in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract and European patent EP 1830857 claiming oral BDP in conjunction with a short duration of high-dose prednisone with a rapid taper for the reduction of mortality associated with GVHD and leukemia.

In addition to issued and pending patents, we also have “Orphan Drug” designations for orBec®SGX203 in the U.S. for pediatric Crohn’s disease, and for orBec® in the U.S. and in Europe.Europe for GI GVHD. Our Orphan Drug designations provide for seven years of post approval marketing exclusivity in the U.S. and ten years exclusivity in Europe for the use of orBec® in the treatment of GI GVHD.Europe. We have pending patent applications for this indication that, if granted, may extend our anticipated marketing exclusivity beyond the seven year post-approval exclusivity provided by t hethe Orphan Drug Act of 1983.

orBec®/Oral BDP License Agreement

On November 24, 1998, the Company, known at the time as Enteron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Enteron”) and George B. McDonald (“Dr. McDonald”) entered into an exclusive license agreement for the rights to intellectual property, including know-how, relating to orBec®/oral BDP.  The Company has an exclusive license to commercially exploit the covered products worldwide, subject to Dr. McDonald’s right to make and use the technology for research purposes and the U.S. Government’s right to use the technology for government purposes.  In consideration for the license, the Company has paid to Dr. McDonald a license fee in the amount of $20,000 and is required to (i) reimburse Dr. McDonald for certain out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Dr. McDonald in connection with the patent applications and issued patents, (ii) pay Dr. McDonald a milestone payment in the amount of $300,000; (iii) issue Dr. McDonald shares of common stock equal to 8% of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of November 24, 1998, with certain anti-dilution protection, and (iv) pay Dr. McDonald royalty payments equal to 6% of net sales of the covered products.

orBec®Additionally, in the event that the Company sublicenses it rights under this license agreement, the Company will be required to pay Dr. McDonald 25% of any sublicense fees and royalty payments paid by the sublicense to the Company.

The term of this agreement expires upon the expiration of the licensed patent applications or patents.  After five years from the date of the agreement, Dr. McDonald has the right to terminate this agreement in its entirety or to terminate exclusivity under the agreement if the Company or its sublicense has not commercialized or are not actively attempting to commercialize a covered product.
Additionally, the agreement terminates: (i) automatically upon the Company becoming insolvent; (ii) upon 30 days notice, if the Company breaches any obligation under the agreement without curing such breach during the notice period; and (iii) upon 90 days notice by the Company.  After any termination, the Company will have the right to sell its inventory for a period not to exceed three months following the date of termination, subject to the payment of the amounts owed under the agreement.

On July 26, 2011, the Company, Enteron, and Dr. McDonald entered into an amendment to their exclusive license agreement.  Under the license agreement, Dr. McDonald would have been entitled to receive (i) $1,250,000 upon the closing of the July 26, 2011 amendment executed by the Company and Sigma-Tau; and (ii) $250,000 upon an approval of orBec® by the EMEA.  Pursuant to the amendment, the Company agreed to pay Dr. McDonald (i) $612,500 in cash and $400,000 in common stock of the Company (based upon the closing price of the Company’s common stock on July 26, 2011) upon the closing of the amendment between the Company and Sigma-Tau and (ii) $400,000 in cash upon an approval of orBec® by the EMEA.

ThermoVax™ License Agreement

In November 1998,On September 1, 2009, we entered into anexecuted a worldwide exclusive worldwide, royalty bearingoption to license agreement with George B. McDonald, M.D., including the right to grant sublicenses, for the rights to the intellectual property and know-how relating to orBec®. In addition, Dr. McDonald receives $80,000 per annum as a consultant.
We also executed an exclusive license to patent applications for “Use of Anti-Inflammatories to Treat Irritable Bowel Syndrome” fromwith the University of Texas Medical Branch-Galveston. UnderColorado (“UC”) for ThermoVaxTM which is the subject of U.S. patent application number 60/896,429 filed on March 22, 2007 entitled “Method of Preparing an Immunologically-Active Adjuvant-Bound Dried Vaccine Composition.” This patent and its corresponding foreign filings are pending and licensed to Soligenix by the UC and they address the use of adjuvants in conjunction with vaccines that are formulated to resist thermal inactivation. The license agreements, we will be obligated to make performance-based milestone payments,agreement also covers thermostable vaccines for biodefense as well as royalty paymentsother potential vaccine indications. In addition, Soligenix in conjunction with UC, filed a provisional patent application number 61/487,206 on any net salesMay 17, 2011 entitled: “Thermostable Vaccine Compositions and Methods of oral BDP.Preparing Same.”

RiVax™ Intellectual PropertyLicense Agreement

In January 2003, we executed a worldwide exclusive option to license patent applications with University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (“UTSW”) for the nasal, pulmonary and oral uses of a non-toxic ricin vaccine. In June 2004, we entered into a license agreement with UTSW for the injectable rights to the ricin vaccine and, in October 2004, we negotiated the remaining oral rights to the ricin vaccine. Our license obligates us to pay $50,000 in annual license fees. Through this license, we have rights to the issued patent number 7,175,848 entitled “Ricin A chain mutants lacking enzymatic activity as vaccines to protect against aerosolized ricin.” This patent includes methods of use and composition claims for RiVax™.

VeloThrax™ License Option Agreement

In December of 2011, we optioned a license to the VeloThrax™ patent from the President and Fellows of Harvard College. VeloThrax™ is the subject of U.S. patent No. 7,037,503, issued on May 2, 2006 and entitled, “Compounds and Methods for the Treatment and Prevention of Bacterial Infection”, along with any reissue, renewal, reexamination, substitution or extension thereof. The PCT application patent was filed in May 2001 and will expire in May 2021 (barring any patent term extensions).

Research and Development Expenditure

We spent approximately $4,500,000$6.3 million and $1,600,000$6.0 million in the years ended December 31, 20092011 and 2008,2010, respectively, on research and development.  The amounts we spent on research and development per product during the years ended December 31, 20092011 and 20082010 are set forth in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this prospectus.

Employees
  
As of June 22, 2010,October 31, 2012, we had 139 full-time employees, 64 of whom are Ph.D.s.MDs/PhDs.

Properties

We currently lease approximately 5,250 square feet of office space at 29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10, Princeton, New Jersey 08540. This office space currently serves as our corporate headquarters. On February 7, 2012, we entered into a lease agreement through March 31, 2015 for our existing office space.  The rent for the first 12 months is approximately $8,000 per month, or approximately $18.25 per square foot on an annualized basis. This rent increases to approximately $8,310 per month, or approximately $19.00 per square foot on an annualized basis, for the remaining 24 months.  Our office space is sufficient to satisfy our current needs.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are a party to claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Our management evaluates our exposure to these claims and proceedings individually and in the aggregate and allocates additional monies for potential losses on such litigation if it is possible to estimate the amount of loss and if the amount of the loss is probable.


MANAGEMENT’SMANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

The following discussion and analysis provides information that we believe is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our results of operation and financial condition. You should read this analysis in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes and our unaudited consolidated interim financial statements and their notes. This discussion and analysis contains statements of a forward-looking nature relating to future events or our future financial performance. These statements are only predictions, and actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating such statements, you should carefully consider the various factors identified in this prospectus, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or i mpliedimplied by, any forward-looking statements, including those set forth in “Risk"Risk Factors" in this prospectus. See "Forward-Looking Statements."

Our Business Overview

Soligenix, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in 1987.  We are a late-stage research and development stage biopharmaceutical company that is focused on developing products to treat the life-threatening side effects of cancer treatment and serious gastrointestinal diseases where there remains an unmet medical need, as well as developing several biodefense vaccines and therapeutics.

We maintain two active business segments: BioTherapeutics and Vaccines/BioDefense.

Our BioTherapeutics business segment intends to develop orBec® (oraloral beclomethasone dipropionate or oral(oral BDP) for indications such as pediatric Crohn’s disease and other biotherapeutic products, including LPMTM Leuprolide.acute radiation enteritis. Our Vaccines/BioDefense business segment intends to convert itsincludes active development programs for RiVax™, our ricin toxin vaccine, program and VeloThrax™, our anthrax vaccine, and OrbeShield™, our gastrointestinal acute radiation injury program from early stage development tosyndrome (“GI ARS”) therapeutic. The advanced development of our vaccine programs is currently supported by our heat stabilization technology, known as ThermoVax™, under existing and manufacturing.on-going government grant funding.

OurAn outline of our business activities can be outlined asstrategy follows:

·  
complete the pivotal Phase 3 confirmatory clinical trial for orBec® in the treatment of acute gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host disease (“GI GVHD”);
·  
identify a development and marketing partner for orBec® for territories outside of North America, as we have granted an exclusive license to Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Sigma-Tau”) to commercialize orBec® in the U.S., Canada and Mexico;
·  
conduct and complete a Phase 2 clinical trial of orBec® for the prevention of acute GVHD;
·  conduct and completeInitiate a Phase 1/2 clinical trial of SGX201 (oral BDP) for the treatment of radiation enteritis;oral BDP, known as SGX203, in pediatric Crohn’s disease;
·  evaluate and initiate additional clinical trials to exploreEvaluate the effectiveness of oralorBec®/Oral BDP in other therapeutic indications involving inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal (“GI”) tract such as irritable bowel syndrome,prevention of acute radiation injuryenteritis and Crohn’s disease;treatment of chronic GI GVHD;
·  
reinitiate development ofDevelop RiVax™ and VeloThrax™ in combination with our other biotherapeutics products, including LPMTM Leuprolide;
·  continueproprietary vaccine heat stabilization technology, known as ThermoVax™, to secure additional government funding for each of our BioDefense programs through grants, contractsdevelop new heat stable vaccines in biodefense and procurements;
·  convert our biodefense vaccine programs from early stage development to advanced development and manufacturinginfectious diseases with the potential to collaborate and/or partner with other companies in the biodefense area;these areas;
·  acquireContinue to apply for and secure additional government funding for each of our BioTherapeutics and Vaccines/BioDefense programs through grants, contracts and/or procurements;
Acquire or in-license new clinical-stage compounds for development; and
·  exploreExplore other business development and acquisition strategies.


Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate these estimates and judgments on an on-going basis.

Intangible Assets

One of the most significant estimates or judgments that we make is whether to capitalize or expense patent and license costs. We make this judgment based on whether the technology has alternative future uses, as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 730, Research and Development. Based on this consideration, we capitalized all applicable outsidepayments made to legal firms that are engaged in filing and filing costs incurred in the procurement and defense of patents.

We capitalize and amortize intangibles over their expected useful life – generally a period of 11protecting rights to 16 years. We capitalize legal costs associated with the protection and maintenance of our patentsintellectual property and rights for our current products in both the domestic and international markets. As a late stage research and development company with drug and vaccine products in an often lengthy clinical research process, weWe believe that patent rights are one of our most valuable assets. Patents and patent applications are a key currencycomponents of intellectual property, especially in the early stage of product development, as their purchase and maintenance gives us access to key product development rights from our academic and industrial partners. These rights can also be sold or sub-licensed as part of our strategy to partner our products at each stag estage of development.development as the intangible assets have alternative future use. The legal costs incurred for these patents consist of work associated with filing new patents designed to protect, preserve, maintain and perhaps extendextending the lives of the patents. Therefore, our policy is toWe capitalize thesesuch costs and amortize themintangibles over the remainingtheir expected useful life, generally a period of the patents. We capitalize intangible assets’ alternative future use as referred11 to in FASB ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other and FASB ASC 730, Research and Development.16 years.

These intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable or if the underlying program is no longer being pursued. If the sum of the expected undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of the related asset or group of assets, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the related asset or group of assets.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred.incurred in accordance with FASB ASC 730, Research and Development. Research and development includes costs such as clinical trial expenses, contracted research and license agreement fees with no alternative future use, supplies and materials, salaries andstock based compensation, employee benefits, equipment depreciation and allocation of various corporate costs. Purchased in-process research and development expense represents the value assigned or paid for acquired research and development for which there is no alternative future use as of the date of acquisition.

Revenue Recognition

OurPrincipally our revenues are generated from NIH grants and revenues from licensing activities and the achievement of licensing milestones and NPAP sales(in prior periods). Recording of orBecrevenue is applied in accordance with FASB ASC 605, ®Revenue Recognition, ASC 605-25 and/or Accounting Standard Update, ASU, 2009-13, Revenue Recognition – Multiple Element Arrangements. The revenue from NIH grants is based upon subcontractor costs and internal costs incurred that are specifically covered by the grant,grants, plus a facilities and administrative rate that provides funding for overhead expenses. These revenues are recognized when expenses have been incurred by subcontractors or when we incur internal expenses that are related to the grant. Licensing and associated milestone revenues are recorded when earned. Revenue from NPAP sales

Accounting for Warrants

We considered FASB ASC 815, Evaluating Whether an Instrument is Considered Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock, which provides guidance for determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) issued by an entity is indexed to the entity’s stock, and therefore, qualifying for the first part of orBec® are recorded when the product is shipped.scope exception in paragraph 815-10-15. We evaluated the warrants’ provisions and determined that they were indexed to our own stock and therefore to be accounted for as an equity instrument for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.


Stock-Based Compensation

From time to time, we issue restricted shares of common stock to vendors consultants, and employeesconsultants as compensation for services performed. These shares are typically issued as restricted stock, unless issued to non-affiliates under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, where the stock may be issued as unrestricted. The restricted stock can only have the restrictive legend removed if the shares underlying the certificate are sold pursuant to an effective registration statement, which we must file and have approved by the SEC, if the shares underlying the certificate are sold pursuant to Rule 144, provided certain conditions are satisfied, or if the shares are sold pursuant to another exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.amended (the “Securities Act”).

We determine stock-based compensation expense for options, warrants and shares of common stock granted to non-employees in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Stock Compensation, and FASB ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, and represents the fair value of the consideration received, or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever may be more reliably measured. For options that vest over future periods, the fair value of options granted to non-employees is amortized as the options vest. The option’s price is remeasured using the Black-Scholes model at the end of each quarterly reporting period. Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period.

New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, New Accounting Pronouncements, for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.

Material Changes in Results of Operations

Three and Six Months Ended March 31, 2010June 30, 2012 Compared to March 31, 20092011

For the three months ended March 31, 2010,June 30, 2012, we had a net loss of $2,136,260$979,878 as compared to a net loss of $2,145,096$1,931,317 for the same period in the prior year, representing a marginal increasedecrease in the net loss of $8,836,$951,439 or less than 1%.

For the three months ended March 31, 2010, revenues and associated costs relate to NIH grants awarded in support of our ricin, botulinum and thermostable vaccines development and from the NPAP sales of orBec®49%. For the threesix months ended March 31, 2010,June 30, 2012, we had revenuesa net loss of $335,796$2,418,633 as compared to $530,317a net loss of $3,651,728 for the same period in the prior year, representing a decrease of $194,521,$1,233,095 or 37%34%.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, revenues and associated costs related to NIH grants awarded supported development of our thermostable vaccines and orBec®. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we had revenues of $762,851 as compared to $405,820 for the same period in the prior year, representing an increase of $357,031 or 88%. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we had revenues of $1,410,269 as compared to $1,213,825 for the same period in the prior year, representing an increase of $196,444 or 16%. The decreaseincreases in revenues wasduring both periods were a result of decreasesincreases in NIH grant revenues as we reacheddrawdowns and the end of our earlier NIH grants before theassociated development work under our newer grants had commenced.underlying them.

We incurred costs related to that revenuethose revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010June 30, 2012 and 20092011 of $273,773$616,330 and $417,309,$349,511, respectively, representing a decreasean increase of $143,536,$266,819. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, costs related to revenues were $1,172,901 as compared to $903,548 for the same period in the prior year, representing an increase of $269,353, or 34%30%. These costs relate to payments made to subcontractors in connection with research performed in support ofpursuant to the grants and, ingrants. The increases are due to work performed on the case of NPAP sales, the cost of product sold. This decrease follows from the decrease in NIH grant revenuesgrants discussed above.

Our gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2010June 30, 2012 was $62,023$146,521 as compared to $113,008$56,309 for the same period in 2011, representing an increase of $90,212 or 160%. The increase in gross profit is directly related to the increase in grant revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, gross profit was $237,368 as compared to $310,277 for the same period in the prior year representing a decrease of $50,985,$72,909 or 45%23%. This decrease follows from theThe decrease in NIH grant revenues discussed above.gross profit is primarily related to the reimbursement in first quarter 2011 of certain salary costs.

Research and development spending increased marginallyexpenses decreased by $7,292, or less than 1%,$1,012,742 to $1,598,291$500,980 for the three months ended March 31, 2010June 30, 2012 as compared to $1,590,999$1,513,722 for the same period in 2009. During2011. The significant decrease is a result of the firstdiscontinuation of the confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec® for the treatment of acute GI GVHD. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, research and development expenses were $1,377,774 compared to $2,886,526 for the same period in 2011, reflecting a spending decrease of $1,508,752 related to the discontinued Phase 3 orBec® clinical trial.

General and administrative expenses increased by $151,841, or 32%, to $627,218 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as compared to $475,377 for the same period in 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, general and administrative expenses was $1,282,261 representing an increase of $202,874, or 19% compared to $1,079,387 for the same period in 2011. These increases are primarily attributable to a greater share of allocated salaries to general administrative resulting from a reduction in the number of specifically identifiable research and development programs.

Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to 2010

For the year ended December 31, 2011, we had a net loss of $2,378,594 as compared to a net loss of $7,386,579 for the prior year, representing a decreased loss of $5,007,985 or 68%. This decrease in the net loss is primarily attributable to the receipt of $5,000,000 from Sigma-Tau as payment on the execution of our expanded license agreement into the European territory (the “Sigma-Tau Agreement”) offset by increased spending of $286,211 in research and development for the year ended December 31, 2011 over 2010 we incurred expenses of $782,204 in connection withrelated to the preparation and conduct of the confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec® for the treatment of acute GI GVHD. Our primary vendor for such servicesFor the year ended December 31, 2011, there was Numoda Corporation, which represented approximately $716,000a slight increase in general and administrative expenses of these expenses.$40,930.


General
For the year ended December 31, 2011, revenues and administrative expenses increased marginally by $5,960, or 1%,associated costs relate to $538,097 forNIH grants awarded in support of the three monthsdevelopment of ThermoVax™ as well as our ricin toxin vaccine, orBec® and the Sigma-Tau Agreement. For the year ended MarchDecember 31, 2010,2011, we had revenues of $7,662,822 as compared to $532,137$1,947,628 for the same period in 2009.

Stock-based compensation expenses related to research and development decreased $33,186, or 45%, to $40,204 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $73,390 for the same period in 2009. Stock-based compensation expenses related to general and administrative decreased $50,391, or 70%, to $22,059 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to $72,450 for the same period in 2009. These decreasesprior year, representing an increase of $5,715,194. The increased revenues were a result of fewer new employee grants$5,000,000 received relating to datethe Sigma-Tau Agreement and increases in 2010NIH drawdowns and new options issuedthe associated development work underlying them.

We incurred costs related to that revenue in the last quarteryear ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 of 2008 that began vesting early$2,108,228 and $1,638,402, respectively, representing an increase of $469,826, or 29%. These costs primarily relate to payments made to subcontractors in 2009.connection with research performed pursuant to grants. The cost changes are due to work performed on the NIH grant revenues discussed above.

Net interest incomeOur gross profit for the three monthsyear ended MarchDecember 31, 20102011 was $368$5,554,594 as compared to $10,872$309,226 for the same period in the prior year, representing a decreasean increase of $10,504, or 97%.$5,245,368. This decreaseincrease is almost entirely due to lower prevailing interest rates available on our cash balancesthe Sigma-Tau Agreement and increase in 2010grant revenues discussed above and a 2011 reimbursement of certain period salary costs which there is no current period cost. Excluding the license revenue associated with the Sigma-Tau Agreement, gross profit would have been $554,594 for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Research and development spending increased by $286,211, or 5%, to $6,272,616 for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to 2009.
Financial Condition

Cash and Working Capital

As of March 31, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $5,932,000 as compared to $7,692,000 as of December 31, 2009, representing a $1,760,000 or 23% decrease over$5,986,405 for the prior year. As of March 31, 2010, we had working capital of approximately $5,183,000 as compared to working capital of $6,690,000 as of December 31, 2009, representing a decrease of $1,507,000. The decrease was the result of cash used in operating activities over the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, our cash used in operating activities was approximately $1,795,000, compared to $1,606,000 for the same period in 2009, representing an increase of $189,000 or 12%. This increase is primarily relatesrelated to the conduct of ourthe confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec® for the treatment of acute GI GVHD.

General and administrative expenses slightly increased by $40,930, or 2%, to $2,242,172 for the year ended December 31, 2011, as compared to $2,201,242 for the prior year.

Net interest income (expense) for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $7,444 as compared to $11,332 for the prior year, representing a decrease of $3,888, or 34%. This decrease was due to substantially lower interest rates earned on cash balances in 2011 versus the prior year.

Other income (expense) for the year ended December 31, 2010 included $234,700 of proceeds, net of transaction costs, from grants in response to an application submitted for qualified investments in qualifying therapeutic discovery projects under Section 48D of the Internal Revenue Code. The qualifying therapeutic discovery project program was not renewed in 2011.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, in accordance with the State of New Jersey’s Technology Business Tax Certificate Program, which allowed certain high technology and biotechnology companies to sell unused net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards to other New Jersey-based corporate taxpayers based in New Jersey, we sold New Jersey NOL carryforwards, resulting in the recognition of $574,157 of income tax benefit, net of transaction costs. There can be no assurance as to the continuation or magnitude of this program in future years.

Business Segments

We maintain two active business segments for the year ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010: Vaccines/BioDefense and BioTherapeutics.

Revenues for the Vaccines/BioDefense business segment for the year ended December 31, 2011 were $2,010,234 as compared to $1,441,228 for the year ended December 31, 2010, representing an increase of $569,006 or 39%. This increase is primarily attributed to NIH grant revenue for work towards our ThermoVax™ vaccine technology. Revenues for the BioTherapeutics business segment for the year ended December 31, 2011 were $5,652,588 as compared to $506,400 for the year ended December 31, 2010, representing an increase of $5,146,188. This significant increase is a result of $5,000,000 received relating to the Sigma-Tau Agreement.
Loss from operations for the Vaccines/BioDefense business segment for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $154,395 as compared to $1,204,824 for the year ended December 31, 2010, representing a decreased loss of $1,050,429. This decrease is primarily attributed to NIH grant revenue for work towards our ThermoVax™ vaccine technology and a 2011 reimbursement of certain period salary costs which there is no current period cost. In June 2010 we closed ontook a private placement resultingone time patent write-off cost of $378,501 in gross proceedsconnection to the return of approximately $5.9 million.the botulinum toxic vaccine to Thomas Jefferson University. Loss from operations for the BioTherapeutics business segment for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $1,278,156 as compared to $5,018,090 for the year ended December 31, 2010, representing a decrease of $3,739,934. This decreased loss is primarily attributed to the $5,000,000 received relating to the Sigma-Tau Agreement offset by the conduct of the confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec® in 2011.
Amortization and depreciation expense for the Vaccines/BioDefense business segment for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $42,640 as compared to $36,843 for the year ended December 31, 2010, representing an increase of $5,797, or 16%, primarily related to newly capitalized patent costs in 2011. Amortization and depreciation expense for the BioTherapeutics business segment for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $181,213 as compared to $146,832 for the year ended December 31, 2010, representing an increase of $34,381, or 23%, primarily related to newly capitalized patent costs in 2011.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

Cash and Working Capital

As of June 30, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $4,431,288 as compared to $5,996,668 as of December 31, 2011, representing a decrease of $1,565,380 or 26%. As of June 30, 2012, we had working capital of $3,629,811 as compared to working capital of $5,696,444 as of December 31, 2011, representing a decrease of $2,066,633 or 36%. The decrease in cash and working capital was primarily the result of cash used in operating activities over the six month period. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, our cash used in operating activities was $1,560,625.

Based on ourthe Company’s current rate of cash outflows, cash on hand, the timely collection of milestone payments under collaboration agreements, proceeds from ourits grant-funded programs, we believereductions in headcount and expected proceeds from the State of New Jersey Technology Business Tax Certificate Transfer Program, management believes that ourits current cash will be sufficient to meet theits anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures throughinto the firstfourth quarter of 2012.2013.

Our plans with respect to additionalour liquidity management include, but are not limited to, the following:

·  The CompanyWe have instituted a cost reduction plan which has $9.6reduced headcount and will continue to reduce costs wherever possible.
We have approximately $5.0 million in active grant funding still available to support itsour associated research programs in 2010 and beyond.  Additionally, the Company has submittedinto 2014. We plan to submit additional grant applications for further support of these programs and others with various funding agencies, and received encouraging feedback to date on the likelihood of funding.agencies.

·  The Company hasWe have continued to use equity instruments to provide a portion of the compensation due to vendors and collaboration partners and expectsexpect to continue to do so for the foreseeable future.

·  The Company has approximately $7.7 millionWe will pursue sales of Net Operating Losses (“NOL”) sales in available capacity underthe State of New Jersey, pursuant to its Fusion Capital equity facility.  AlthoughTechnology Business Tax Certificate Transfer Program. Based on the receipt of $574,157 in proceeds from the sale of NJ NOL in 2011, the Company has historically drawn down modest amounts under this agreement,expects to participate in the Company could draw more within certain contractual parameters.program during 2012 and beyond; and

·  The CompanyWe may seek additional capital in the private and/or public equity markets to continue itsour operations, respond to competitive pressures, develop new products and services, and to support new strategic partnerships. The Company isWe are currently evaluating additional equity financing opportunities and may execute them when appropriate. However, there can be no assurances that the Companywe can consummate such a transaction, or consummate a transaction at favorable pricing.
Reverse Stock Split

On February 1, 2012, we completed a reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock at a ratio of 1-for-20, whereby, every 20 shares of our common stock was exchanged for one share of our common stock. Our common stock began trading on the OTCQB on a reverse split basis on February 2, 2012. All share and per share data have been restated to reflect this reverse stock split.

Expenditures

Under our budget and based upon our existing product development agreements and license agreements pursuant to letters of intent and option agreements, we expect our total research and development expenditures for the next 12 months to be approximately $6,700,000$3.3 million before any grant reimbursements, of which $5,000,000$1.3 million relates to the BioTherapeutics business and $1,700,000$2.0 million relates to the Vaccines/BioDefense business. We anticipate grant revenues in the next 12 months of approximately $2.1 million to offset research and development expenses, primarily for the development of our thermostableThermoVax™ vaccine technology, and very limited contribution to the developmentwind down costs of SGX201 in acute radiation enteritisthe Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec® in the amounttreatment of approximately $1,900,000.acute GI GVHD.

The table below details our costs for research and development by program and amounts reimbursed under grants for the threesix months ended March 31:June 30:

 2010 2009  2012 2011 
Research & Development Expenses          
orBec® $782,204  $1,309,732  $516,982  $1,713,193 
RiVax™ and thermostable vaccines  433,509   224,500   743,918   845,916 
BT-VACC™  378,501   52,690 
Oraprine™  1,500   1,500   -   1,500 
LPM™-Leuprolide  2,577   2,577 
LPM™-Leuprolide and Other  116,874   325,917 
Total $1,598,291  $1,590,999  $1,377,774  $2,886,526 
            
Reimbursed under Grants            
orBec® $57,060  $19,784  $98,828  $328,503 
RiVax™ and thermostable vaccines  162,713   397,525   1,074,073   575,045 
BT-VACC™  54,000   - 
Total $273,773  $417,309   1,172,901   903,548 
     
Grand Total $1,872,064  $2,008,308  $2,550,675  $3,790,074 

CommitmentsEffects of Inflation and Foreign Currency Fluctuations

We havedo not believe that inflation or foreign currency fluctuations significantly affected our financial position and results of operations as of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 or 2010.

Contractual Obligations

The Company has commitments of approximately $365,000 as of June 30, 2012 relating to several licensing agreements with consultants and universities, which upon clinical or commercialization success may require the payment of milestones and/or royalties if and when achieved. However, there can be no assurance that clinical or commercialization success will occur.

On April 1, 2009,February 7, 2012, we entered into a sub-leaselease agreement through March 31, 20122015 for our existing office space in Princeton, New Jersey. We were required to provide 4 months of rent as a security deposit.space. The rent for the first 1812 months will beis approximately $7,500$8,000 per month, or $17.00approximately $18.25 per square foot.foot on an annualized basis. This rent increases to approximately $7,650$8,310 per month, or $17.50approximately $19.00 per square foot on an annualized basis, for the remaining 1824 months.

In February 2007, ourthe Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of the following shares to Dr. Schaber, Mr. Myrianthopoulos,and Dr. Brey and certain other employees and a consultant, upon the completion of a transaction, or series or a combination of related transactions negotiated by our Board of Directors whereby, directly or indirectly, a majority of our capital stock or a majority of its assets are transferred from us and/or our stockholders to a third party: 1,000,00050,000 common shares to Dr. Schaber; 750,000 common shares to Mr. Myrianthopoulos; 200,000and 10,000 common shares to Dr. Brey; and 450,000 common sharesBrey. The employment agreement with Dr. Schaber has been amended to employees and a consultant shall be issued.  reflect this obligation. 

Employees with employment contracts have severance agreements that will provide separation benefits from the Company if they are involuntarily separated from employment.


We have future obligations over On February 15, 2012, Mr. Myrianthopoulos’ employment agreement was terminated. However, he continues to serve the next five yearsCompany as follows:

 
Year
 
Research and Development
  
Property and
Other Leases
  Total 
2010 $2,211,480  $75,330  $2,286,810 
2011  616,440   98,942   715,382 
2012  140,000   28,743   168,743 
2013  60,000   5,793   65,793 
2014  60,000   1,448   61,448 
Total $3,087,920  $210,256  $3,298,176 

Results of Operations For the Year Ended December 31, 2009

Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to 2008

For the year ended December 31, 2009, we had a net loss of $6,034,453 as compared to a net loss of $3,422,027 for the prior year, representing an increase of $2,612,426 or 76%. This increase is primarily attributed to increased spending of $2,971,052 in research andconsultant on business development for the year ended December 31, 2009 over 2008 related to the preparation for and conduct of the confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec® for the treatment of acute GI GVHD. For the year ended December 31, 2009, there was also an increase in general and administrative expenses of $339,532, which reflects the $270,000 expense recorded in first quarter 2008 related to the Fusion Capital commitment shares, offset by staffing and other corporate cost increases this year.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, revenues and associated costs relate to NIH grants awarded in support of our ricin, botulinum and thermostable vaccines development and from the NPAP sales of orBec®. For the year ended December 31, 2009, we had revenues of $2,816,037 as compared to $2,310,265 for the prior year, representing an increase of $505,772, or 22%. During 2009, we received a $1 million clinical milestone payment from Sigma Tau, our collaborative partner on the orBec® Phase 3 study. The increase in revenues generated by this one-time milestone payment was offset by decreases in NIH grant revenues as we reached the end of our earlier NIH grants before the w ork under our newer grants had commenced. Included in those revenue figures for the year ended December 31, 2009, we also recorded revenues of $56,000 from NPAP sales of orBec®, compared to $40,618 recorded in the prior year.

We incurred costs related to that revenue in the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 of $1,483,641 and $1,886,431, respectively, representing a decrease of $402,790, or 21%.  This decrease follows from the decrease in NIH grant revenues discussed above.

Our gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $1,332,396 as compared to $423,834 for the prior year, representing an increase of $908,562, or 214%. This increase is almost entirely explained by the $1 million clinical milestone revenue recorded in 2009 for which there were no corresponding costs.

Research and development spending increased by $2,971,052, or 191%, to $4,523,375, for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to $1,552,323 for the prior year.  This increase is primarily related to the preparation for and conduct of the confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec® for the treatment of acute GI GVHD.

General and administrative expenses increased $339,532, or 17%, to $2,281,251 for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $1,941,719 for the prior year reflecting staffing and other corporate cost increases this year.
 
Stock-based compensation expenses related to research and development increased $28,666, or 16%, to $210,834 for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $182,168 for the prior year. Stock-based compensation expenses related to general and administrative increased $164,784, or 81%, to $368,232 for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to $203,448 for the prior year. These increases were related to stock options that were issued to new employees hired in 2009 and for options issued in the last quarter of 2008 that began vesting in 2009.

Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $19,242 as compared to $33,797 for the prior year, representing a decrease of $14,555, or 43%. This decrease was due to substantially lower interest rates earned on cash balances in 2009 versus the prior year.

Business Segments

We had two active business segments for the year ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:  BioDefense and BioTherapeutics.

Revenues for the BioDefense business segment for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $1,670,536 as compared to $2,269,647 for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of $599,111, or 26%. This decrease is primarily attributed to a reduction in NIH grant revenues as we reached the end of our earlier NIH grants focusing on RiVax and botulinum vaccines before the work under our new thermostable vaccine technology grant had commenced.  Revenues for the BioTherapeutics business segment for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $1,145,501 as compared to $40,618 for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of $1,104,883.  This substantial increase is a result of the receipt of a $1 million clinical milestone payment from Sigma Tau in 2009 upon the initiation of enrollment in the confirm atory Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec®.

Loss from operations for the BioDefense business segment for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $389,157 as compared to $132,272 for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of $256,885, or 194%. This increase is primarily attributed to a reduction in NIH grant revenues as we reached the end of our earlier NIH grants focusing on RiVax and botulinum vaccines before the work under our new thermostable vaccine technology grant had commenced.  Loss from operations for the BioTherapeutics business segment for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $3,444,838 as compared to $1,556,429 for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of $1,888,409, or 121%. This increase is primarily attributed the preparation for and conduct of the confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec®, offset to some degree by the receipt of a $1 million clinical milestone payment from Sigma Tau in 2009.

Amortization and depreciation expense for the BioDefense business segment for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $91,420 as compared to $85,354 for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of $6,066, or 7%, primarily related to newly capitalized patent support costs in 2009. Amortization and depreciation expense for the BioTherapeutics business segment for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $77,496 as compared to $58,829 for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of $18,667, or 32%, primarily related to newly capitalized patent support costs in 2009.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

Cash and Working Capital

As of December 31, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $7,692,000 as compared to $1,475,000 as of December 31, 2008, representing an increase of $6,217,000, or 421%, over the prior year. As of December 31, 2009, we had working capital of approximately $6,690,000 as compared to working capital of $537,000 as of December 31, 2008, representing an increase of $6,153,000. The increase was the result of the $10.9 million in proceeds from the sale of our common stock and warrants to accredited investors and a collaborative partner, less the cash used in operating and investing activities over the period. We have used equity instruments in the past to provide a portion of the compensation due to our employees, vendors and collaborative partners, and expect to continue to do so in the foreseeable future. For the year e nded December 31, 2009, our cash used in operating activities was approximately $4,603,000, compared to $2,788,000 for the prior year, representing an increase of $1,815,000, or 65%. This increase primarily relates to the preparation for and conduct of our confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec® for the treatment of acute GI GVHD.

The table below details our costs by program for each of the two years ended December 31, 2009:

  2009  2008 
Research & Development Expenses      
orBec®
 $3,211,682  $921,562 
RiVax™ & Thermostable Vaccines
  1,264,218   312,486 
BT-VACC™
  31,167   201,529 
Oraprine™
  6,000   4,500 
LPM™ Leuprolide
  10,308   112,246 
                        Total $4,523,375  $1,552,323 
         
Reimbursed under NIH Grants        
orBec®
 $162,106  $122,551 
RiVax™ & Thermostable Vaccines
  1,321,535   1,681,274 
BT-VACC™
  -   82,606 
                        Total $1,483,641  $1,886,431 
                                Grand Total $6,007,016  $3,438,754 

Effects of Inflation and Foreign Currency Fluctuations

We do not believe that inflation or foreign currency fluctuations significantly affected our financial position and results of operations as of and for the years ended December 31, 2009 or 2008.

Contractual Obligations

We have a contractual obligation of approximately $3.3 million as of December 31, 2009 in connection with a collaboration agreement with Numoda for the execution of our confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec® that began in September 2009 and is expected to complete in first half of 2011.

We have several licensing agreements with consultants and universities, which upon clinical or commercialization success may require the payment of milestones and/or royalties if and when achieved; however, there can be no assurance that clinical or commercialization success will occur.

On April 1, 2009, we entered into a sublease agreement through March 31, 2012 for office space in Princeton, New Jersey. We were required to provide 4 months of rent as a security deposit. The rent for the first 18 months will be approximately $7,500 per month, or approximately $17.00 per square foot on an annualized basis. This rent increases to approximately $7,650 per month, or approximately $17.50 per square foot on an annualized basis, for the remaining 18 months.

On April 24, 2008, we signed a three-year lease for a copier.

Employees with employment contracts have severance agreements that will provide separation benefits from the Company if they are involuntarily separated from employment.

As a result of the above agreements, we havethe Company has future contractual obligations over the next five years as follows:

Year Research and Development  Property and Other Leases  Total  Research and Development 
Property and
Other Leases
 Severance Total 
2010 $3,013,640  $95,398  $3,109,038 
2011  631,440   92,699   724,139 
2012  155,000   22,950   177,950  $65,000  $50,802  $37,795  $153,597 
2013  75,000   -   75,000   75,000   104,559   -   179,559 
2014  75,000   -   75,000   75,000   101,198   -   176,198 
2015  75,000   24,938   -   99,938 
2016  75,000   -   -   75,000 
Total $3,950,080  $211,047  $4,161,127  $365,000  $281,497  $37,795  $684,292 
 
 
33- 35 -


DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table below contains information regarding the current members of the Board of Directors and executive officers:officers. The ages of individuals are provided as of June 22, 2010:October 31, 2012:

Name
 
Age
 
Position
Christopher J. Schaber, Ph.D.PhD 4346 Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
Cyrille F. BuhrmanKeith L. Brownlie, CPA 3760 Director
Gregg A. Lapointe, C.P.A., M.B.A.CPA 5153 Director
Robert J. Rubin, M.D.MD 6466 Director
Evan MyrianthopoulosJerome Zeldis, MD, PhD 4562Director
Robert N. Brey, PhD62 Chief FinancialScientific Officer and Senior Vice President and Director
Brian L. Hamilton, M.D., Ph.D.Kevin J. Horgan, MD 6253 Chief Medical Officer and Senior Vice President
Robert N. Brey, Ph.D.Joseph M. Warusz, CPA 59Chief Scientific Officer and Senior Vice President
Christopher P. Schnittker, C.P.A.4156 Vice President of Administration, ControllerFinance, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

Christopher J. Schaber, Ph.D.PhD has over 23 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry. Dr. Schaber has been our President and Chief Executive Officer and a director since August 2006. He was appointed interim Chairman of the Board on October 8, 2009. Dr. Schaber has servedHe also serves on the boardsboard of directors of both the Alliance for BioSecurity and BioNJBiotechnology Council of New Jersey (“BioNJ”) since May 2008 and January 2009, respectively, and represents Soligenix onis a member of the corporate councils of both the National Organization for Rare Diseases (“NORD”) and the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (“ASBMT”) since October 2009 and July 2009, respectively. Prior to joining Soligenix, Dr. Schaber served from 1998 to 2006 as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Discovery Laboratories, Inc., where he was responsible for overall p ipelinepipeline development and key areas of commercial operations, including regulatory affairs, quality control and assurance, manufacturing and distribution, pre-clinical and clinical research, and medical affairs, as well as coordination of commercial launch preparation activities. During his tenure at Discovery Laboratories, Inc., Dr. Schaber played a significant role in raising in excess ofover $150 million through both public offerings and private placements. From 1996 to 1998, Dr. Schaber was a co-founder of Acute Therapeutics, Inc., and served as its Vice President of Regulatory Compliance and Drug Development. From 1994 to 1996, Dr. Schaber was employed by Ohmeda PPD, Inc., as Worldwide Director of Regulatory Affairs and Operations. From 1989 to 1994, Dr. Schaber held a variety of regulatory, development and operations positions with The Liposome Company, Inc., and Elkins-Sinn Inc., a division of Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories. Dr. Schaber received his B.A.BA degree from Western Maryland College, his M.S.MS degree in P harmaceuticsPharmaceutics from Temple University School of Pharmacy and his Ph.D.PhD degree in Pharmaceutical Sciences from the Union Graduate School. Dr. Schaber was selected to serve as a member of our Board of Directors because of his extensive experience in drug development and pharmaceutical operations, including his experience as an executive senior officer with our Company and Discovery Laboratories, Inc., and as a member of the boardsboard of directors of the Alliance for BioSecurity and BioNJ; because of his proven ability to raise funds and provide access to capital; and because of his advanced degrees in science and business.

Cyrille F. Buhrman Keith L. Brownlie, CPAhas been a director since June 2007.2011. Mr. Buhrman is Chairman of the Pacific Healthcare Group of Companies, a full-service regulatory affairs, commercialization and distribution company, focusing on specialty pharmaceuticals, medical supplies, medical technology, OTC and consumer health products across the Asian region.  In addition to serving on the Board of Soligenix, Mr. Buhrman has served on the boards of directors of Canyon Pharmaceuticals, a privately-held company specialty pharmaceutical company based in Basel, Switzerland andBrownlie currently serves on the boards of directors of several other privately-held pharmaceutical and medical technology companies in the Asia Pacific region.  Mr. Buhrman also heads up his own private investment fund that special izes in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. Mr. Buhrman is also one of our largest shareholders. Mr. Buhrman was selected to serve as a member of our Board of Directors because of his experience as a CEO of a pharmaceutical company, as a member of the boardsBoard of severalDirectors of Epicept Corporation, a publicly traded, specialty pharmaceutical company focused on the clinical development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products for the treatment of cancer and pain, a position he has held since April 2011.  Mr. Brownlie also serves on the Board of Directors of RXi Pharmaceuticals Corporation, a publicly traded, biotechnology company focused on discovering, developing and commercializing innovative therapies addressing major unmet medical deviceneeds using RNAi-targeted technologies, a position he has held since June 2012. From 1974 to 2010, Mr. Brownlie worked with the accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP where he served as audit partner for numerous public companies and as an investorwas the Life Sciences Industry Leader for the New York metro area where he was involved with over 100 public and private financings and M&A transactions. Mr. Brownlie received a BS in Accounting from Lehigh University and is a Certified Public Accountant in the biotechnologystate of New Jersey. Mr. Brownlie co-founded the New Jersey Entrepreneur of the Year Program and pharmaceutical industries.was Vice President and Trustee of the New Jersey Society of CPAs. In addition, he served as accounting advisor to the board of the Biotechnology Council of New Jersey.


Gregg Lapointe, C.P.A., M.B.A.CPA has been a director since March 10, 2009. Mr. Lapointe has served on the Board of Directors of the Pharmaceuticals Research and Manufacturers of America (“PhRMA”) and SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and has been a member of the Corporate Council of NORD for several years. He haspreviously served in varying roles for Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a private biopharmaceutical company, sincefrom September 2001 through March 2012, including Chief Operating Officer from November 2003 to April 2008 and Chief Executive Officer sincefrom April 2008.2008 to March 2012. From May, 1996 to August, 2001, he served as Vice President of Operations and Vice President, Controller of AstenJohnson, Inc. (formerly JWI Inc.). Prior to that, Mr. Lapointe spent several years in the Canadian medical products industry in both distribution and manufacturing. Mr. Lapointe began his career at Price Waterhouse. Mr. Lapointe received his B.A. degree in Commerce from Concordia Univ ersityUniversity in Montreal, Canada, a graduate diploma in Accountancy from McGill University and his M.B.A. degree from Duke University. He is a C.P.A. in the state of Illinois and a Chartered Accountant in Ontario, Canada. Mr. Lapointe was selected to serve as a member of our Board of Directors because of his significant experience in the areas of global strategic planning and implementation, business development, corporate finance, and acquisitions, and his experience as an executive officer and board member in the pharmaceutical medical products industries.

Robert J. Rubin, M.D.MD has been a director since October 8, 2009. Dr. Rubin has also been a clinical professor of medicine at Georgetown University since 1995. From 1987 to 2001, he was president of the Lewin Group (purchased by Quintiles Transnational Corp. in 1996), an international health policy and management consulting firm. From 1994 to 1996, Dr. Rubin served as Medical Director of ValueRx, a pharmaceutical benefits company. From 1992 to 1996, Dr. Rubin served as President of Lewin-VHI, a health care consulting company. From 1987 to 1992, he served as President of Lewin-ICF, a health care consulting company. From 1984 to 1987, Dr. Rubin served as a principal forof ICF, Inc., a health care consulting company. From 1981 to 1984, Dr. Rubin served as the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation at the Department of Health and Human Services and as the Assistant Surgeon General in the United States Public Health Service. Dr. Rubin has served on the Board of CardioNet, Inc. since 2007. He is a board certified nephrologist and internist. Dr. Rubin received an undergraduate degree in Political Science from Williams College and his medical degree from Cornell University Medical College. Dr. Rubin was selected to serve as a member of our Board of Directors because of his vast experience in the health care industry, including his experience as a nephrologist, internist, clinical professor of medicine and Assistant Surgeon General, and his business experience in the pharmaceutical industry.

Evan MyrianthopoulosJerome Zeldis, MD, PhD has been a director since 2002June 2011. Dr. Zeldis is currently Chief Executive Officer of Celgene Global Health and Chief Medical Officer of Celgene Corporation, a publicly traded, fully integrated biopharmaceutical company, where he has been employed since 1997. From September 1994 to February 1997, Dr. Zeldis worked at Sandoz Research Institute and the Janssen Research Institute in both clinical research and medical development. He has been a board member of several biotechnology companies and is currently our Chief Financial Officeron the boards of the NJ Chapter of the Arthritis Foundation, the Castleman’s Disease Organization and Senior Vice President, after joining us in NovemberPTC Therapeutics. Additionally, he has served as Assistant Professor of 2004 as President and Acting Chief Executive Officer. From November 2001Medicine at the Harvard Medical School (from July 1987 to November 2004, he was President and founderSeptember 1988), Associate Professor of CVL Advisors Group Inc.Medicine at University of California, Davis from (September 1988 to September 1994), a financial consulting firm specializing in the biotechnology sector. Prior to founding CVL Advisors Group, Inc., Mr. Myrianthopoulos was a co-founderClinical Associate Professor of Discovery Laboratories, Inc. During his tenureMedicine at Discovery Laboratories, Inc. from June 1996 to November 2001, Mr. Myrianthopoulos held the positions of Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance, where he was responsible for raising approximately $55 million in four private placements. He also helped negotiate and manage Discovery Laboratories, Inc.’s mergers with Ansan Pharmaceuticals and Acute Therapeutics, Inc. P rior to co-founding Discovery Laboratories, Inc., Mr. Myrianthopoulos was a Technology Associate at Paramount Capital Investments, L.L.C., a New York City based biotechnology venture capital and investment banking firm from OctoberCornell Medical School (January 1995 to December 1997. Prior to joining Paramount Capital Investments, LLC, Mr. Myrianthopoulos was a managing partner at a hedge fund2003) and also held senior positions in the treasury departmentProfessor of Clinical Medicine at the National Australia Bank where he was employed asRobert Wood Johnson Medical School (July 1998 to June 2010). Dr. Zeldis received a spotBA and derivatives currency trader. Mr. Myrianthopoulos holdsan MS from Brown University, and an M Phil, an MD, and a B.A. degreePhD in EconomicsMolecular Biophysics and PsychologyBiochemistry from EmoryYale University. Mr. Myrianthopoulos was selected to serve as a member of our Board of Directors because of his experience as principal financial officer and principal executive officer of our Company and Discovery Laboratories and his experienceDr. Zeldis trained in raising capital.

Brian L. Hamilton, M.D., Ph.D. has been Chief Medical Officer and Senior Vice President since March 11, 2009.  His academic careerInternal Medicine at the University of WashingtonUCLA Center for the Health Sciences and in Gastroenterology at the University of Miami focused on the use of bone marrow transplantation to treat children with congenital immune deficiency, with research in the immunobiology of GVHD. In the pharmaceutical industry, he has worked with both large pharmaceutical companies (Astra, USAMassachusetts General Hospital and Wyeth) and several biotechnology companies. From December 2001 to June 2004, he was Senior Director of Clinical Research with Wyeth Research.  From June 2004 to March 2006, he was Vice President for Clinical and Regulatory Affairs at Merrimack Pharmaceutical.  He was ChiefHarvard Medical Officer with BioVex from September 2006 to March 2007.  He was a consultant in clinical development as Medical Director with Biopharm Solutions, Inc. from March 2007 to October 2008.  From October 2008 to March 2009, he was Acting Vice President of Medical Affairs with Ziopharm Oncology.School. He has expertise in clinical developmentpublished 116 peer reviewed articles and regulatory affairs with small molecules, biologics, vaccines,24 reviews, book chapters, and genetically modified oncolytic viruses in oncology, hematology, rheumatology, and immunology.  At Astra, USA, he had a significant role in the clinical development and registration of both Pulmicort Turbuhaler for the treatment of patients with asthma and Rhinocort Aqua for the treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis.  Dr. Hamilton received his M.D. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Washington, with post-graduate training in Pediatrics, Allergy, Immunology, and Oncology.editorials.

Robert N. Brey, Ph.D.PhD has been with the Company since January 1996 and is currently our Chief Scientific Officer and Senior Vice President. He has also held the positions of Vice President Vaccine Development and Vice President of Research and Development. He also has held Scientific, Management and Project Management positions in the Lederle-Praxis division of American Cyanamid, now a division of Wyeth, in which he participated in the successful development of a vaccine for Haemophilius influenzaenfluenza meningitis, and a vaccine for pneumonia. While at Lederle-Praxis, Dr. Brey was Manager of Molecular Biology Research for vaccines and Project Manager for development of oral vaccines from 1985 through 1993. From 1993 t hroughthrough 1994, Dr. Brey served as Director of Research and Development of Vaxcel, in which he was responsible for developing adjuvant technology and formulations for improved vaccines. From 1994 through 1996, Dr. Brey established an independent consulting group, Vaccine Design Group, to identify and develop novel vaccine technologies and platforms. Before entering into drug and vaccine delivery, he held senior scientific positions at Genex Corporation from 1982 through 1986. Dr. Brey received a B.S. degree in Biology from Trinity College in Hartford, Connecticut, his Ph.D.PhD degree in Microbiology from the University of Virginia and performed postdoctoral studies at MIT with Nobel Laureate Salvador Luria.

Christopher P. Schnittker, C.P.A. has been our Vice President of Administration, Controller and Corporate Secretary since July 2009.  He has more than 19 years of financial management experience primarily in publicly-held life science companies.  From June 2000 until joining Soligenix, Mr. Schnittker was a Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of several publicly-held biotechnology and specialty pharmaceutical companies, including: VioQuest Pharmaceuticals Inc. (from July 2008 until joining Soligenix); Micromet, Inc. (from October 2006 through December 2007); Cytogen Corporation (from September 2003 through May 2006); and Genaera Corporation (from June 2000 through August 2003).  From December 1997 through June 2000, he was Director of Finance an d Controller of GSI Commerce, an e-commerce technology company. From June 1995 through December 1997, he served in various financial reporting and internal control manager roles with Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals Inc. (now part of the Sanofi Aventis Group).  From September 1990 through June 1995, he was a member of the Audit and Assurance Services division at Price Waterhouse LLP (now PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP), working largely with the firm’s pharmaceutical and technology clients.  Mr. Schnittker received his Bachelor’s degree in Economics and Business, with a concentration in Accounting, from Lafayette College in 1990 and is a currently-licensed Certified Public Accountant in the State of New Jersey.


Kevin J. Horgan, MD has been with the Company since January 2011 and is currently our Chief Medical Officer. Dr. Horgan is a board-certified gastroenterologist with more than 25 years academic and pharmaceutical experience. He has conducted research in cellular immunology and has experience in the care of patients with inflammatory bowel disease, including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Prior to joining Soligenix, Dr. Horgan served from 1997 to 2005 as Senior Director of Clinical Research at Merck & Co., Inc., where he led the development of the first neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, EMEND®, which was approved for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. From 2006 to 2008, he was Vice President of Clinical Immunology at Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc., where he designed and conducted gastroenterology clinical studies for new compounds and indications including REMICADE™. From 2008 until joining Soligenix, Dr. Horgan was Head of Internal Medicine Research and Development in medical imaging with specific focus on oncology and neuroscience with GE Healthcare (a unit of General Electric Company). Dr. Horgan received his medical degree from University College, Cork, Ireland and completed training in internal medicine with Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom and Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, followed by an immunology research fellowship with the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, MD. His research on human T-cell differentiation, activation and migration with emphasis on integrin adhesion molecules provided a framework for subsequent validation of three therapeutic targets. Dr. Horgan then did a fellowship in gastroenterology with University of California at Los Angeles and was then an Assistant Professor of Medicine there, where his research focus was gastrointestinal inflammatory disorders.
Joseph M. Warusz, CPA has more than 28 years of financial management experience in public and private life science companies as well as large pharma. Prior to joining Soligenix on June 1, 2011 as Vice President of Administration and Controller, he held senior financial positions with Amicus Therapeutics, Inc., Orchid Cellmark, Inc., and NexMed, Inc., as well as consulting assignments at Ardea BioSciences, Inc., and NovaDel Pharma, Inc., all R&D-focused companies in the biotechnology and specialty pharmaceuticals arenas. On February 15, 2012, he was appointed Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Prior to 1998, Mr. Warusz also held management positions in financial analysis, accounting, reporting and auditing at Bristol-Myers Squibb and Peat Marwick Main & Company. He received his BS in accounting and MBA in finance at Drexel University and is a Certified Public Accountant.
Summary Compensation

The following table contains information concerning the compensation paid during each of the two years ended December 31, 20092011 to our Chief Executive Officer and each of the twofour other most highly compensated executive officers during 20092011 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”).

Summary Compensation Table
Name Position Year Salary  Bonus  Option Awards  All Other Compensation  Total 
Christopher J. Schaber 1
 CEO & President 2011 $370,000  $50,000  $68,400  $35,529  $523,929 
    2010 $350,981  $100,000  $408,908  $27,529  $887,419 
                         
Evan Myrianthopoulos 2
 Former CFO & Senior VP 2011 $242,500  $25,000  $34,200  $35,529  $337,229 
    2010 $230,723  $50,000  $195,161  $27,677  $503,561 
                         
Robert N. Brey 3
 CSO & Senior VP 2011 $210,000  $13,000  $19,950  $21,853  $264,803 
    2010 $210,000  $40,000  $157,987  $11,955  $419,942 
                         
Kevin J. Horgan 4
 CMO & Senior VP 2011 $281,589  $16,000  $203,575  $22,543  $523,707 
                         
Joseph M. Warusz 5
 Acting CFO & VP 2011 $104,028  $7,000  $152,620  $19,627  $283,275 
                                 
Name Position Year Salary  Bonus  Option Awards  All Other Compensation  Total 
Christopher J. Schaber1
 CEO & 2009 $337,709  $120,000   -  $24,737  $482,446 
  President 2008 $300,000  $100,000  $127,120  $24,844  $551,964 
                         
Evan Myrianthopoulos2
 CFO & 2009 $202,605  $70,000   -  $24,811  $297,416 
  Senior VP 2008 $200,000  $50,000  $54,480  $23,474  $327,954 
                         
Brian L. Hamilton3
 CMO & Senior VP 2009 $206,400  $60,000  $87,400  $26,843  $380,643 
____________

1Dr. Schaber deferred payment of his 20082010 annual bonus of $100,000 until February 28, 2009January 15, 2011 and his 20092011 annual bonus of $120,000$50,000 until January 15, 2010.2012. Option award figures include the value of common stock option awards at grant date as calculated under FASB ASC 718. Other compensation for 2008 and 2009 representrepresents health insurance costs.costs paid by the Company.

2Mr. Myrianthopoulos deferred payment of his 20082010 annual bonus of $50,000 until February 28, 2009January 15, 2011 and his 20092011 annual bonus of $70,000$25,000 until January 15, 2010.2012. Option award figures include the value of common stock option awards at grant date as calculated under FASB ASC 718. Other compensation for 2008 and 2009 representrepresents health insurance costs.costs paid by the Company. On February 15, 2012, Mr. Myrianthopoulos’ employment agreement with the Company was terminated.

3Dr. Hamilton joined the Company in April 2009. HeBrey deferred payment of his 20092010 annual bonus of $60,000$40,000 until January 15, 2010.2011 and his 2011 annual bonus of $13,000 until January 15, 2012. Option award figures include the value of common stock option awards at grant date as calculated under FASB ASC 718. Other compensation for 2009 represents health insurance costs.costs paid by the Company.

4Dr. Horgan deferred payment of his 2011 annual bonus of $13,000 until January 15, 2012. Option award figures include the value of common stock option awards at grant date as calculated under FASB ASC 718. Other compensation represents health insurance costs paid by the Company.

5Mr. Warusz deferred payment of his 2011 annual bonus of $7,000 until January 15, 2012. Option award figures include the value of common stock option awards at grant date as calculated under FASB ASC 718. Other compensation represents health insurance costs paid by the Company.  Mr. Warusz served as Vice President and Controller from May 2011 until February 15, 2012, when he became Acting Chief Financial Officer and Vice President Finance.

Employment and Severance Agreements
 
In August 2006, we entered into a three-year employment agreement with Christopher J. Schaber, Ph.D. Pursuant to this employment agreement, we agreed to pay Dr. Schaber a base salary of $300,000 per year and a minimum annual bonus of $100,000. This employment agreement was renewed in December 27, 2007 for aan additional term of three years. We agreed to issue him options to purchase 2,500,000125,000 shares of our common stock, with one third immediately vesting and the remainder vesting over three years. Upon termination without “Just Cause” as defined by this agreement, we would pay Dr. Schaber nine months of severance, as well as any accrued bonuses, accrued vacation, and we would provide health insurance and life insurance benefits for Dr. Schaber and his dependants.dependants for nine months following such termination. No unvested options shall vest beyond the termination date. Dr. SchaberR 17;sSchaber’s monetary compensation (base salary of $300,000 and bonus of $100,000) remained unchanged from 2006 with the 2007 renewal.  He will be paid nine months of severance upon termination of employment. Upon a change in control of the Company due to merger or acquisition, all of Dr. Schaber’s options shall become fully vested, and be exercisable for a period of five years after such change in control (unless they would have expired sooner pursuant to their terms). In the event of his death during the term of the agreement, all of his unvested options shall immediately vest and remain exercisable for the remainder of their term and become the property of Dr. Schaber’s immediate family. This agreement automatically renewed in December 2010 for an additional term of three years.

In December 2004, we entered into a three-year employment agreement with Evan Myrianthopoulos. Pursuant to this employment agreement we agreed to pay Mr. Myrianthopoulos a base salary of $185,000 per year. After one year of service Mr. Myrianthopoulos would be entitled to a minimum annual bonus of $50,000. This employment agreement was renewed inon December 27, 2007 for aan additional term of three years. We agreed to issue him options to purchase 500,00025,000 shares of our common stock, with the options vesting over three years. Upon termination without “Just Cause” as defined by this agreement, we would pay Mr. Myrianthopoulos six months of severance subject to set off, as well as any unpaid bonuses and accrued vacation would become payable.vacation. No unvested options shallwere to vest


beyond the termination date. Mr. Myrianthopoulos also received 150,0007,500 options, vested immediately when he was hired in November 2004, as President and Acting Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Myrianthopoulos’ monetary compensation (base salary of $200,000 and bonus of $50,000) remained unchanged from 2006 with the 2007 renewal.  He will be paid six months of severance upon termination of employment. Upon a change in control of the Company due to merger or acquisition, all of Mr. Myrianthopoulos’ options shall become fully vested, and be exercisable for a period of three years after such change in control (unless they would have expired sooner pursuant to their terms). In the event of his death during the term of contract,the agreement, all of his unvested options shall immediately vest and remain exercisable for the remainder of their term and become property of Mr. Myrianthopoulos’ immediate family. This employment agreement was amended on January 4, 2011, extending his employment for an additional two years, and thereafter the term of employment automatically renews for a period of two years, unless the Company or Mr. Myrianthopoulos deliver three months notice of an election not to renew the term. On February 15, 2012, Mr. Myrianthopoulos’ employment agreement was terminated, however he continued to serve as a member of our Board of Directors until June 21, 2012.  As set forth in the employment agreement, we paid Mr. Myrianthopoulos six months of severance, accrued bonus and vacation as well as provided insurance benefits during the term of his severance.  In connection with the termination of Mr. Myrianthopoulos’ employment agreement, we accelerated the vesting of options to purchase 53,908 shares of common stock and Mr. Myrianthopoulos forfeited options to purchase 72,500 shares of common stock, resulting in Mr. Myrianthopoulos holding vested options to purchase 192,500 shares of common stock with expiration dates ranging from November 14, 2012 to November 30, 2021.  Mr. Myrianthopoulos continues to serve the Company as a business development and financial consultant.

On March 27, 2009, the Compensation Committee approved the increase in salaries for Dr. Schaber to $350,000 and Mr. Myrianthopoulos to $230,000.

On June 22, 2011, the Compensation Committee approved the increase in salaries for Dr. Schaber to $390,000 and Mr. Myrianthopoulos to $255,000. Additionally, their fixed minimum annual bonus payable was eliminated and revised to an annual targeted bonus of their respective annual base salary. Dr. Schaber and Mr. Myrianthopoulos targeted bonus is 40% and 30%, respectively.

In January 2011, we entered into a two-year employment agreement with Dr. Kevin J. Horgan. Pursuant to this employment agreement we agreed to pay Dr. Horgan a base salary of $290,000 per year, a one-time signing bonus of $15,000 and a targeted annual bonus of 30% of base salary. We agreed to issue him options to purchase 62,500 shares of our common stock, with one third immediately vesting and the remainder vesting over three years. Upon termination without “Just Cause” as defined by this agreement, we would pay Dr. Horgan six months of severance, as well as any accrued bonuses, accrued vacation, and we would provide health insurance benefits for Dr. Horgan and his dependants. No unvested options shall vest beyond the termination date.

We do not currently have an employment agreement with Dr.  Robert N. Brey, our Chief Scientific Officer and Senior Vice President. Dr. Brey’s compensation is determined by our Board of Directors and our Compensation Committee.

In May 2011, we entered into a one-year employment agreement with Mr. Joseph M. Warusz, our Acting Chief Financial Officer, Vice President Finance and Chief Accounting Officer. Pursuant to the agreement, we have agreed to pay Mr. Warusz $175,000 per year and a targeted annual bonus of 20% of base salary. We also agreed to issue him options to purchase 40,000 shares of our common stock with one-third immediately vesting and the remainder vesting over three years. Upon termination without “Just Cause”, as defined in this agreement, we would pay Mr. Warusz three months of severance, accrued bonuses and vacation, and health insurance benefits. No unvested options vest beyond the termination date. On December 1, 2011, the Compensation Committee increased the salary of Mr. Warusz to $180,000.
In February 2007, our Board of Directors authorized the issuance of the following number of shares to each of Dr. Schaber Mr. Myrianthopoulos and Dr. Brey immediately prior to the completion of a transaction, or series or a combination of related transactions negotiated by our Board of Directors whereby, directly or indirectly, a majority of our capital stock or a majority of our assets are transferred from the Company and/or our stockholders to a third party: 1,000,00050,000 common shares to Dr. Schaber and 750,00010,000 common shares to Mr. Myrianthopoulos.Dr. Brey. The amended agreements includeagreement with Dr. Schaber includes our obligation to issue such shares to the executiveshim if such event occurs.

On December 18, 2008, the Compensation Committee approved the grant to Mr. Myrianthopoulos of stock options to purchase 1,200,000 at an exercise price of $0.06 per share. The stock options, which are for a term of 10 years and subject to earlier termination upon the occurrence of certain events related to termination of employment, vest at a rate of 25% immediately and 25% per year for 3 years.

In March 2009, we entered into a two-year employment agreement with Brian L. Hamilton, M.D., Ph.D. Pursuant to this employment agreement we agreed to pay Dr. Hamilton a base salary of $270,000 per year and a minimum annual bonus of $70,000. We agreed to issue him options to purchase 1,000,000 shares of our common stock, with one quarter immediately vesting and the remainder vesting over three years. Upon termination without “Just Cause” as defined by this agreement, we would pay Dr. Hamilton six months of severance, as well as any accrued bonuses, accrued vacation, and we would provide health insurance and life insurance benefits for Dr. Hamilton and his dependants. No unvested options shall vest beyond the termination date. Upon a change in control of the Company due to merger or acquisition, all of Dr. Hamilton’s op tions shall become fully vested, and be exercisable for a period of three years after such change in control (unless they would have expired sooner pursuant to their terms).  In the event of his death during term of the agreement, all of his unvested options shall immediately vest and remain exercisable for the remainder of their term and become the property of Dr. Hamilton’s immediate family.

On March 11, 2009, the Compensation Committee approved the grant to Dr. Hamilton of stock options to purchase 1,000,000 at an exercise price of $0.11 per share. The stock options, which are for a term of 10 years and subject to earlier termination upon the occurrence of certain events related to termination of employment, vest at a rate of 25% immediately and 25% per year for 3 years.

On March 27, 2009, the Compensation Committee approved the increase in salaries for Dr. Schaber to $350,000 and Mr. Myrianthopoulos to $230,000. On December 1, 2009, the Compensation Committee approved the increase in salaries for Dr. Hamilton to $280,000, effective January 1, 2010. Dr. Schaber’s and Mr. Myrianthopoulos’ salaries were not changed at this time.



Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
 
The following table contains information concerning unexercised options, stock that has not vested, and equity incentive plan awards for the Named Executive Officers outstanding at December 31, 2009.2011 as adjusted for the reverse stock split of 1-for-20 effective February 1, 2012. We have never issued Stock Appreciation Rights.
 
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
  
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options (#)
  Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned  Option Exercise  Option Expiration
Name Exercisable  Unexercisable  Options (#)  Price ($)  Date
Christopher J. Schaber  125,000   -   -  $5.40 8/28/2016
   45,000   -   -  $9.40 8/9/2017
   140,000   -   -  $1.20 12/17/2018
   61,875   48,125   48,125  $4.64 6/30/2020
   30,000   90,000   90,000�� $0.64 11/30/2021
                  
Evan Myrianthopoulos  7,500   -   -  $7.00 11/14/2012
   2,500   -   -  $18.00 9/15/2013
   2,500   -   -  $11.60 6/11/2014
   7,500   -   -  $9.40 11/10/2014
   25,000   -   -  $9.80 12/13/2014
   20,000   -   -  $7.00 5/10/2016
   27,500   -   -  $9.40 8/9/2017
   60,000   -   -  $1.20 12/17/2018
   29,531   22,969   22,969  $4.64 6/30/2020
   15,000   45,000   45,000  $0.64 11/30/2021
                  
Robert N. Brey  30,000   -   -  $6.60 5/10/2016
   10,000   -   -  $9.40 8/9/2017
   40,000   -   -  $1.20 12/17/2018
   23,906   18,594   18,594  $4.64 6/30/2020
   8,750   26,250   26,250  $0.64 11/30/2021
                  
Kevin J. Horgan  27,344   35,156   35,156  $3.44 1/30/2021
   15,000   45,000   45,000  $0.64 11/30/2021
                  
Joseph M. Warusz  15,000   25,000   25,000  $4.10 5/30/2021
   7,500   22,500   22,500  $0.64 11/30/2021
 
  
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options
 (#)
   Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned   Option Exercise  Option Expiration
Name Exercisable  Unexercisable  
 Options (#)
  
Price ($)
  Date
Christopher J. Schaber  2,500,000(1)  -   -  $0.27 8/28/2016
   731,250(2)  168,750   168,750  $0.47 8/29/2017
   1,400,000(3)  1,400,000   1,400,000  $0.06 12/17/2018
Evan Myrianthopoulos  150,000(4)  -   -  $0.35 11/14/2012
   50,000(5)  -   -  $0.90 9/15/2013
   50,000(6)  -   -  $0.58 6/11/2014
   150,000(7)  -   -  $0.47 11/10/2014
   500,000(8)  -   -  $0.49 12/13/2014
   400,000(9)  -   -  $0.35 5/10/2016
   446,875(10)  103,125   103,125  $0.47 8/29/2017
   600,000(11)  600,000   600,000  $0.06 12/17/2018
Brian L. Hamilton  437,500(12)  562,500   562,500  $0.11 3/10/2019
(1) 2,000,000 of these options were granted on August 29, 2006 and have a 10-year term, with 25% vested on August 29, 2006 and the remainder vesting monthly in 36 equal installments beginning August 29, 2006.  500,000 of these options were granted on August 10, 2007 and have a 9-year term, with 33.3% vested on August 10, 2007 and 8.325% of the remaining balance vesting quarterly over a two year period beginning November 10, 2007.
(2) These options, granted on August 10, 2007, have a 10-year term with 25% vested on August 10, 2007 and the remainder vesting annually in over a three year period beginning on August 10, 2008.
(3) These options, granted on December 18, 2008, have a 10-year term with 25% vested on December 18, 2008 and the remainder vesting annually in over a three year period beginning on December 18, 2009.
(4) These options, granted on November 15, 2002, have a 10-year term with 25% vested on November 15, 2002 and the remainder vesting annually in over a three year period beginning on November 15, 2003.
(5) These options, granted on September 16, 2003, have a 10-year term with 25% vested on September 16, 2003 and the remainder vesting annually in over a three year period beginning on September 16, 2004.
(6) These options, granted on June 12, 2004, have a 10-year term with 25% vested on June 12, 2004 and the remainder vesting annually in over a three year period beginning on June 12, 2005.
(7) These options, granted on November 11, 2004, have a 10-year term with 25% vested on November 11, 2004 and the remainder vesting annually in over a three year period beginning on November 11, 2005.
(8) These options, granted on December 14, 2004, have a 10-year term with 25% vested on December 14, 2004 and the remainder vesting annually in over a three year period beginning on December 14, 2005.
(9) These options, granted on May 11, 2006, have a 10-year term with 25% vested on May 11, 2006 and the remainder vesting annually in over a three year period beginning on May 11, 2007.
(10) These options, granted on August 30, 2007, have a 10-year term with 25% vested on August 30, 2007 and the remainder vesting annually in over a three year period beginning on August 30, 2008.
(11) These options, granted on December 18, 2008, have a 10-year term with 25% vested on December 18, 2008 and the remainder vesting annually in over a three year period beginning on December 18, 2009.
(12) These options, granted on March 11, 2009, have a 10-year term with 25% vested on March 11, 2009 and the remainder vesting annually in over a three year period beginning on March 11, 2010.

 
Compensation of Directors

The following table contains information concerning the compensation of the non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.2011.

Compensation of Directors
Name 
Fees Earned Paid in Cash 1
  
Option Awards 2
  Total 
Keith Brownlie $9,245  $46,944  $56,189 
Gregg A. Lapointe $26,497  $30,001  $56,498 
Robert J. Rubin $29,746  $30,001  $59,747 
Jerome Zeldis $5,495  $46,944  $52,439 

Name 
Fees Earned Paid in
Cash (1)
  
Option
Awards (2)
  Total 
Gregg A. Lapointe $16,000  $30,413(3) $46,413 
James S. Kuo $12,000  $27,950(4) $39,950 
Cyrille F. Buhrman $13,000  $27,950(5) $40,950 
Robert J. Rubin $3,000  $75,720(6) $78,720 
1Directors who are compensated as full-time employees receive no additional compensation for service on our Board of Directors. For calendar year 2011 and through June 21, 2012, each independent director who was not a full-time employee was paid $20,000, on a prorated basis, for his or her service on our Board of Directors, the chair of our Audit Committee was paid $15,000, on a prorated basis, and the chairs of our Compensation and Nominating Committees were paid $10,000, on a prorated basis.  Additionally, for calendar year 2011, non-chair Audit Committee members were paid $7,500, on a prorated basis, and non-chair Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee members were paid $5,000, on a prorated basis. Following June 21, 2012, compensation for service on our Board of Directors will be increased to $35,000, on a prorated basis, for each independent director who is not a full-time employee. The compensation for service as a chair or a member of the committees of the Board during 2012 will remain the same as for calendar year 2011.  This compensation is paid quarterly, in arrears.
2For calendar year 2011 and through June 21, 2012, members of our Board of Directors who were not full-time employees (i) received an initial grant of fully vested options to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock and (ii) upon re-election to the Board of Directors, received stock options with a value of $30,000 based upon the Black Scholes valuation method, which options vest at the rate of 25% per quarter, commencing with the first quarter after each annual meeting of stockholders.   Following June 21, 2012, members of our Board of Directors who are not full-time employees (i) will receive an initial grant of fully vested options to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock and (ii) upon re-election to the Board, will receive stock options to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock, which options vest at the rate of 25% per quarter, commencing with the first quarter after June 21, 2012.  Future compensation will be evaluated on an annual basis by the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors.
___________

(1) Directors who are compensated as full-time employees receive no additional compensation for service on our Board of Directors. Each independent director who is not a full-time employee is paid $2,000 for each board or committee meeting attended ($1,000 if such meeting was attended telephonically).
(2) We maintain a stock option grant program pursuant to the nonqualified stock option plan, whereby members of our Board of Directors or its committees who are not full-time employees receive an initial grant of fully vested options to purchase 300,000 shares of common stock, and subsequent prorated annual grants of fully vested options to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock after re-election to our Board of Directors. Option award figures include the value of common stock option awards at grant date as calculated under FASB ASC 718.
(3) As of December 31, 2009, Mr. Lapointe held options to purchase an aggregate of 337,500 shares of common stock.
(4) As of December 31, 2009, Dr. Kuo held options to purchase an aggregate of 875,000 shares of common stock.
(5) As of December 31, 2009, Mr. Buhrman held options to purchase an aggregate of 475,000 shares of common stock.
(6) As of December 31, 2009, Dr. Rubin held options to purchase an aggregate of 300,000 shares of common stock.

For 2010, non-employee directors will be paid $20,000 annually, on a prorated basis, for their service on our Board of Directors, the chairman of our Audit Committee will be paid $7,500 annually, on a prorated basis, and the chairman of our Compensation and Nominating Committees will be paid $5,000 annually, on a prorated basis.  This compensation will be paid quarterly, in arrears. 

Stock Ownership Policy

In April 2012, our Board of Directors adopted a stock ownership policy applicable to our non-employee directors to strengthen the link between director and stockholder interests. Pursuant to the stock ownership policy, each non-employee director is required to hold a minimum ownership position in the common stock equal to the annual cash compensation paid for service on the Board of Directors, exclusive of cash compensation paid for service as a chair or member of any committees of the Board of Directors.
Stock counted toward the ownership requirement includes common stock held by the director, unvested and vested restricted stock, and all shares of common stock beneficially owned by the director held in a trust and by a spouse and/or minor children of the director. The policy provides that the ownership requirement must be attained within three years after the later of June 21, 2012 and the date a director is first elected or appointed to the Board of Directors. To monitor progress toward meeting the requirement, the Nominating Committee will review director ownership levels at the end of March of each year.  Non-employee directors are prohibited from selling any shares of common stock unless such director is in compliance with the stock ownership policy.  A copy of our director compensation and stock ownership policy is publicly available on our website at www.soligenix.com under the “Investors” section.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT

The table below provides information regarding the beneficial ownership of the common stock as of June 22, 2010October 31, 2012 of (1) each person or entity who owns beneficially 5% or more of the shares of our outstanding common stock, (2) each of our directors and nominees for director, (3) each of the Named Executive Officers, and (4) our directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable community property laws, we believe the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock held by them.
 
Beneficial Ownership
Name of Beneficial Owner Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned** Percent of Class
Paolo Cavazza 1
  3,379,958   29.12%
Claudio Cavazza (deceased) 2
  3,068,465   26.64%
Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 3
  3,068,464     26.64%
Christopher J. Schaber 4
  511,509   4.40%
Gregg A. Lapointe 5
  126,386   1.12
Robert N. Brey 6
  132,031   1.17%
Robert J. Rubin 7
  64,099   * 
Joseph  Warusz 8
  40,000   * 
Kevin J. Horgan 9
  72,967   * 
Keith Brownlie 10
  27,500   * 
Jerry Zeldis 11
  27,500   * 
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)  1,001,992   8.31%
 
Name of Beneficial OwnerShares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned**Percent of Class
Paolo Cavazza 1
67,599,044 30.09% 
Claudio Cavazza 2
61,369,248 27.53% 
Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc.2
61,369,248 27.53% 
Biotex Pharma Investments, LLC 3
17,395,000   8.06% 
Hal Mintz 4
13,793,272   6.39% 
Ross Berman 4
13,793,272   6.39% 
Adam Stern 4
13,793,272   6.39% 
Mark Friedman 4
13,793,272   6.39% 
BAM Management, LLC 4
13,793,272   6.39% 
AM Investment Partners, LLC 4
13,793,272   6.39% 
BAM Capital, LLC 5
13,780,472   6.39% 
BAM Opportunity Fund, L.P. 5
13,780,472   6.39% 
Cyrille F. Buhrman 6
  5,375,020 2.49% 
Christopher J. Schaber 7
  5,486,343 2.48% 
Evan Myrianthopoulos 8
  2,824,780 1.29% 
Robert N. Brey 9
  1,300,000 * 
Christopher P. Schnittker 10
     328,125 * 
Robert J. Rubin 11
     690,243 * 
Gregg A. Lapointe 12
  1,898,476 * 
Brian L. Hamilton 13
     562,500 * 
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)18,465,487 8.12% 
_______________
1
Consists ofIncludes (a) 54,227,8162,711,392 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 7,141,432357,072 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days of June 22, 2010October 31, 2012 held by Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (b) 3,282,929164,146 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,756,09787,854 shares of common stock held by Chaumiere Sarl,Sinaf SA, and (c) 1,190,770 shares119,078shares held by Mr. Paolo Cavazza.
Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Sigma-Tau America S.A., which is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Sigma-Tau International S.A., which is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Sigma-Tau Finanziaria S.p.A. Mr. Paolo Cavazza directly and indirectly owns 38% of Sigma-Tau Finanziaria S.p.A.  Chaumiere SarlSinaf SA is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Aptafin S.p.A., which is owned by Mr. Paolo Cavazza and members of his family.  Accordingly, Mr. Paolo Cavazza may be deemed to beneficially own the shares beneficially owned by Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Chaumiere Sarl.Sinaf SA.  Mr. Paolo Cavazza'sCavazza’s address is Via Tesserte, 10, Lugano, Switzerland.
2
Consists of 54,227,816Includes 2,711,392 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 7,141,432357,073 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days of June 22, 2010October 31, 2012 held by Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Sigma-Tau America S.A., which is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Sigma-Tau International S.A., which is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Sigma-Tau Finanziaria S.p.A. Mr. Claudio Cavazza directly and indirectly ownsowned 57% of Sigma-Tau Finanziaria S.p.A.  Accordingly, Mr. Claudio Cavazza may behave been deemed to beneficially own the shares beneficially owned by Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  Mr. Claudio Cavazza'sCavazza’s address iswas Via Sudafrica, 20, Rome, Italy 00144.  The address of Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s is c/o Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 9841 Washingtonian Boulevard, Suite 500, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878.
3Includes 2,280,963 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 98,815 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days of October 31, 2012. The amount does not include 77,344 shares of common stock held by Paolo Cavazza, one of the principal owners of Sigma-Tau. The address of Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is 9841 Washingtonian Boulevard, Suite 500, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878.
3Consists of 17,395,000 shares of common stock. The address of Biotex Pharma Investments, LLC is 220 West 42nd Street 6th Floor New York, New York 10036.
4
Consists of (i) 13,780,472 shares of common stock held by BAM Opportunity Fund, L.P. (“BAM Partnership”) and (ii) 12,800 shares of common stock held by BAM Opportunity Fund SPV, LLC (“BAM SPV”). BAM Capital, LLC (“BAM General Partner”) serves as the general partner of BAM Partnership. BAM Management, LLC (“BAM Investment Manager”) serves as the investment manager to BAM Partnership and is the manager to BAM SPV. AM Investment Partners, LLC (“AMIP LLC”) has entered into an agreement to combine its business with that of BAM Investment Manager. Mr. Hal Mintz serves as a managing member of both BAM General Partner and BAM Investment Manager. Mr. Ross Berman serves as a managing member of both BAM General Partner and BAM Investment Manager. Mr. Adam Stern serves as a managing member of AMIP LLC. Mr. Mark Friedman serves as a managing member of AM IP LLC.
Accordingly, (i) BAM General Partner may be deemed to beneficially own the shares beneficially owned by BAM Partnership; (ii) BAM Investment Manager may be deemed to beneficially own the shares beneficially owned by BAM Partnership and BAM SPV; (iii) AM Investment Partners, LLC may be deemed to beneficially own the shares beneficially owned by BAM Investment Manager; (iv) Messrs. Mintz and Berman may be deemed to beneficially own the shares beneficially owned by BAM General Partner and BAM Investment Manager; and (v) Messrs. Stern and Friedman may be deemed to beneficially own the shares beneficially owned by AMIP LLC.
The address of Messrs. Mintz, Berman, Stern and Friedman, BAM Management, LLC and AM Investment Partners, LLC is 1 Liberty Plaza, 27th Floor, New York, NY 10006.
41


5Consists of 13,780,472 shares of common stock held by BAM Opportunity Fund, L.P. (“BAM Partnership”).  BAM Capital, LLC serves as the general partner of BAM Partnership.  The address of BAM Opportunity Fund, L.P. and BAM Capital, LLC is 1 Liberty Plaza, 27th Floor, New York, NY  10006.
6Consists of 4,900,020 shares of common stock and options to purchase 475,000 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days of June 22, 2010. The address of Mr. Buhrman is c/o Soligenix, 29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.
7Consists of 471,817Includes 50,158 shares of common stock owned by Dr. Schaber, options to purchase 4,975,000459,375 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days of June 22, 2010,October 31, 2012, and warrants to purchase 39,5261,976 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days of June 22, 2010.October 31, 2012. The address of Dr. Schaber is c/o Soligenix, 29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.
85Consists of 224,780Includes 48,781 shares of common stock, owned by Mr. Myrianthopoulos and his wife and options to purchase 2,600,00048,337 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days of June 22, 2010.October 31, 2012, and warrants to purchase 29,268 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days of October 31, 2012. The address of Mr. MyrianthopoulosLapointe is c/o Soligenix, 29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.
 
96Consists ofIncludes options to purchase 1,300,000132,031 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days of June 22, 2010.October 31, 2012. The address of Dr. Brey is c/o Soligenix, 29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.
107Consists of options to purchase 328,125 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Schnittker exercisable within 60 days of June 22, 2010. The address of Mr. Schnittker is c/o Soligenix, 29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.
11Consists of 243,902Includes 12,195 shares of common stock, options to purchase 300,00044,587 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days of June 22, 2010,October 31, 2012, and warrants to purchase 146,3417,317 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days of June 22, 2010.October 31, 2012. The address of Dr. Rubin is c/o Soligenix, 29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.
128Consists of 975,610Includes options to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock options to purchase 337,500 shares of common stockowned by Mr. Warusz exercisable within 60 days of June 22, 2010, and warrants to purchase 585,366 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days of June 22, 2010.October 31, 2012. The address of Mr. LapointeWarusz is c/o Soligenix, 29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.
139Consists ofIncludes options to purchase 562,50072,967 shares of common stock owned by Dr. Horgan exercisable within 60 days of October 31, 2012. The address of Dr. Horgan is c/o Soligenix, 29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.
10Includes options to purchase 27,500 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days of June 22, 2010.October 31, 2012. The address of Dr. HamiltonMr. Brownlie is c/o Soligenix, 29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.
14Includes options to purchase 27,500 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days of October 31, 2012. The address of Mr. Zeldis is c/o Soligenix, 29 Emmons Drive, Suite C-10, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.
 
*Indicates less than 1%.
**Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 22, 2010October 31, 2012 are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of the stockholder holding the options or warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other stockholder. Percentage of ownership is based on 215,773,38711,160,513 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 22, 2010.October 31, 2012.

 
Equity Compensation Plan Information

In December 2005, our Board of Directors approved the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, which was approved by stockholders on December 29, 2005. In September 2007, our stockholders approved an amendment to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the maximum number of shares of our common stock available for issuance under the plan by 10,000,000500,000 shares, bringing the total shares reserved for issuance under the plan to 20,000,0001,000,000 shares. In September 2010, our stockholders approved a second amendment to the 2005 Plan to increase the maximum number of shares of our common stock available for issuance under the plan by 750,000 shares, bringing the total shares reserved for issuance under the plan to 1,750,000 shares. The following table provides information as of December 31, 2009,2011 with respect to options outstanding under our 1995 Amended and Restated Omnibus Incentive Plan and our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.  All share numbers in this paragraph and in the following table have been adjusted for the 1-for-20 reverse stock split effective February 1, 2012.
 
Plan Category 
Number of Securities
to be Issued
upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
  Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights  
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
(excluding securities reflected in the first column)
  
Number of Securities
to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
 Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders1
  19,311,539  $0.24   454,831   1,095,242  $4.41   129,711 
            
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  -   -   -   -   -   - 
TOTAL  19,311,539  $0.24   454,831 
Total  1,095,242  $4.41   129,711 
_________
1Includes our 1995 Amended and Restated Omnibus Incentive Plan and our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.  Our 1995 Amended and Restated Omnibus Incentive Plan expired in 2005 and thus no securities remain available for future issuance under that plan. As of December 31, 2009, under the amended 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, we have issued 1,482,669 shares to individuals as payment for services in the amount of $380,342 as allowed in the plan.

Related Party Transactions

Other than the employment agreements, compensation paid to our directors and our collaboration and supply agreement with Sigma-Tau, we did not engage in any transactions with related parties since January 1, 2010.  For a discussion of our employment agreements and compensation paid to our directors, see “Executive Compensation.” For a discussion of our collaboration and supply agreement with Sigma-Tau, see “Business – BioTherapeutics Overview – orBec® and oral BDP – Commercialization and Market.”

Director Independence

The Board of Directors has determined that Keith Brownlie, Gregg Lapointe, Dr. Robert Rubin and Dr. Jerome Zeldis are “independent” as such term is defined by the applicable listing standards of Nasdaq. Our Board of Directors based this determination primarily on a review of the responses of the Directors to questionnaires regarding their employment, affiliations and family and other relationships.


The following table presents information as of June 22, 2010 and sets forth the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each of the Selling Stockholders. We are not able to estimate the amount of shares that will be held by each Selling Stockholder after the completion of this offering because: (1) the Selling Stockholders may sell less than all of the shares registered under this prospectus; (2) the Selling Stockholders may exercise less than all of their warrants; and (3) to our knowledge, the Selling Stockholders currently have no agreements, arrangements or understandings with respect to the sale of any of their shares. The following table assumes that all of the shares being registered pursuant to this prospectus will be sold. The Selling Stockholders are not making any representation that any shares covered by this prospectus will be offered for sale. Except as otherwise indicated, based on information provided to us by each Selling Stockholder, the Selling Stockholders have sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares of common stock.  Except as otherwise noted, none of the Selling Stockholders nor any of their affiliates have held a position or office, or had any other material relationship, with us.

On June 22, 2010, we completed a private placement in which we issued 28,752,571 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 17,251,542 shares of common stock to the Selling Stockholders, and issued an additional 48,780 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase up to 29,268 shares of common stock to other investors, resulting in gross proceeds of $5,904,277.  The warrants are exercisable at a price of $0.28 per share for a period of five years commencing on June 18, 2010.  The expiration date of the warrants is subject to the acceleration if the closing sales price of the Company’s common stock attains certain per share values.  In connection with the private placement, we granted the Selling Stockholders regis tration rights, and, therefore, we are registering 46,004,113 shares for resale by the Selling Stockholder in this offering.

On February 11, 2009, we entered into a collaboration and supply agreement with Sigma-Tau for the commercialization of orBec®. Pursuant to this agreement, Sigma-Tau has an exclusive license to commercialize orBec® in the U.S., Canada and Mexico (the “Territory”). The first milestone payment of $1 million was made in October 2009 upon the enrollment of the first patient in our confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec® for the treatment of acute GI GVHD. Total milestone payments due from Sigma-Tau for orBec® under the agreement could reach up to $10 million. Sigma-Tau will pay us a 35% royalty (inclusive of drug supply) on net sales in the Territory as well as pay for commercialization expenses, including launch activities. On November 26, 2008, prior to entering the collaboration agreement, we sold Si gma-Tau 16,666,667 common shares at $0.09 per share (the market price at the time) for proceeds of $1,500,000 in exchange for the exclusive rights to negotiate a collaboration deal with us until March 1, 2009.
 
Name of Selling Stockholder
Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned Before the Offering (1)  
Percent of
Common Stock Beneficially Owned Before
the Offering
  Shares Available for Sale Under This Prospectus (2)   
Number of Shares of Common Stock To Be Beneficially Owned After Completion
of the Offering
   
Percent of Common Stock to be Beneficially Owned After Completion
of the Offering
Sigma Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc.61,369,248 (3)  27.53%  13,773,728   47,595,520   21.86
Chaumiere SARL4,682,926 (4)  2.15%  4,682,926   0   * 
Rosalind Capital Partners L.P.2,081,920 (5)  *   2,081,920   0   * 
Wullschleger Martinenghi Manzini Holding S.A.1,951,219 (6)  *   1,951,219   0   * 
DAFNA LifeScience Select Ltd.1,584,390 (7)  *   1,584,390   0   * 
Gregg A. Lapointe1,898,476   *   1,560,976   337,500   * 
Opus Point Healthcare Innovations Fund, LP1,560,976 (8)  *   1,560,976   0   * 
Kingsbridge Capital Ltd.1,365,854 (9)  *   1,365,854   0   * 
John J. Gorman (401k) - Tejas Securities Group, Inc.1,735,150   *   1,120,000   615,150   * 
Cranshire Capital, L.P.1,298,171 (10)  *   1,073,171   225,000   * 
BioHedge Holdings Limited1,040,960 (11)  *       1,040,960   0   * 
Opus Point Healthcare (Low Net) Fund, LP975,610 (12)  *         975,610   0   * 
Revach Fund LP1,730,586 (13)  *   936,586   794,000   * 
Hal Tunick IRA800,000   *   800,000   0   * 
Brio Capital LP780,488 (14)  *   780,488   0   * 
Iroquois Master Fund Ltd.2,262,701 (15)  *   780,488   1,482,213   * 
Opus Point Healthcare Value Fund, LP780,488 (16)  *   780,488   0   * 
Scott Soules1,124,988   *   780,488   344,500   * 
Rosalind Advisors, Inc.780,480 (17)  *   780,480   0   * 
Ugo Di Francesco768,000   *   768,000   0   * 
DAFNA LifeScience Ltd.880,610 (18)  *   655,610   225,000   * 
Rockmore Investment Master Fund Ltd.585,366 (19)  *   585,366   0   * 
DAK Investments Corp.585,366(20)  *   585,366   0   * 
Parallax Biomedical Fund879,035(21)  *   560,000   319,035   * 
DAFNA LifeScience Market Neutral Ltd.491,707(22)  *   491,707   0   * 
Robert J. Rubin690,243   *   390,243   300,000   * 
Richard Molinsky577,805   *   327,805   250,000   * 
Boris Volman320,000   *   320,000   0   * 
John Raphael320,000   *   320,000   0   * 
Michele Whalen320,000   *   320,000   0   * 
Robert Kessler320,000   *   320,000   0   * 
Mauro Bove240,000   *   240,000   0   * 
Marco Codella240,000   *   240,000   0   * 
Warren Holmes278,000   *   208,000   70,000   * 
Michael & Melissa Eustace195,122   *   195,122   0   * 
David A. Dent192,000   *   192,000   0   * 
John Raphael, Tara Raphael 2005 Trust160,000(23)  *   160,000   0   * 
John Raphael, Michael Raphael 2008 Trust160,000(24)  *   160,000   0   * 
Judith Raphael IRA160,000   *   160,000   0   * 
Freestone Advantage Partners, LP97,562(25)  *   97,562   0   * 
Marc Tewey80,000   *   80,000   0   * 
Brian D. Schreiber, M.D.78,048   *   78,048   0   * 
Donald R. DeLillo61,536   *   58,536   3,000   * 
Taha Keilani40,000   *   40,000   0   * 
Gianfranco Fornasini40,000   *   40,000   0   * 
_____________________
 *        Less than 1%.
**       
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 22, 2010, are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of the stockholder holding the options or warrants, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other stockholder. Percentage of ownership is based on 215,773,387 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 22, 2010.
(1) 
The shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants are as follows: Sigma Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - 7,141,432 shares; Chaumiere SARL - 1,756,097 shares; Rosalind Capital Partners L.P. - 780,720 shares; Wullschleger Martinenghi Manzini Holding S.A. - 731,707 shares; DAFNA LifeScience Select Ltd. - 594,146 shares; Gregg A. Lapointe - 585,366 shares; Opus Point Healthcare Innovations Fund, LP - 585,366 shares; Kingsbridge Capital Ltd. - 512,195 shares; John J. Gorman (401k) - Tejas Securities Group, Inc. - 420,000 shares; Cranshire Capital, L.P. - 627,439 shares; BioHedge Holdings Limited - 390,360 shares; Opus Point Healthcare (Low Net) Fund, LP - 365,854 shares; Revach Fund LP - 840,220 shares; Hal Tunick IRA - 300,000 shares; Brio Capital LP - 292,683 shares; Iroquois Master Fund Ltd. - 1,774,896 shares; Op us Point Healthcare Value Fund, LP - 292,683 shares; Scott Soules - 292,683 shares; Rosalind Advisors, Inc. - 292,680 shares; Ugo Di Francesco - 288,000 shares; DAFNA LifeScience Ltd. – 470,854 shares; Rockmore Investment Master Fund Ltd. - 219,512 shares; DAK Investments Corp. - 219,512 shares; Parallax Biomedical Fund - 291,881 shares; DAFNA LifeScience Market Neutral Ltd. - 184,390 shares; Robert J. Rubin - 146,341 shares; Richard Molinsky - 122,927 shares; Boris Volman - 120,000 shares; John Raphael - 120,000 shares; Michele Whalen - 120,000 shares; Robert Kessler - 120,000 shares; Mauro Bove - 90,000 shares; Marco Codella - 90,000 shares; Warren Holmes - 78,000 shares; Michael & Melissa Eustace - 73,171 shares; David A. Dent - 72,000 shares; John Raphael, Tara Raphael 2005 Trust - 60,000 shares; John Raphael, Michael Raphael 2008 Trust - 60,000 shares; Judith Raphael IRA - 60,000 shares; Freestone Advantage Partners, LP - 36,586 shares; Marc Tewey - 30,000 shares; Brian D. Schreiber, M.D. - 29 ,268 shares; Donald R. DeLillo - 21,951 shares; Taha Keilani - 15,000 shares; and Gianfranco Fornasini - 15,000 shares.
The shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options are as follows: Gregg A. Lapointe - 337,500 shares; and Robert J. Rubin - 300,000 shares.
(2)    
The shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants are as follows: Sigma Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - 5,165,148 shares; Chaumiere SARL- 1,756,097 shares; Rosalind Capital Partners L.P. - 780,720 shares; Wullschleger Martinenghi Manzini Holding S.A. - 731,707 shares; DAFNA LifeScience Select Ltd. - 594,146 shares; Gregg A. Lapointe - 585,336 shares; Opus Point Healthcare Innovations Fund, LP - 585,366 shares; Kingsbridge Capital Ltd. - 512,195 shares; John J. Gorman (401k) - Tejas Securities Group, Inc. - 420,000 shares; Cranshire Capital, L.P. - 402,439 shares; BioHedge Holdings Limited 390,360 shares; Opus Point Healthcare (Low Net) Fund, LP - 365,854 shares; Revach Fund LP - 351,220 shares; Hal Tunick IRA - 300,000 shares; Brio Capital LP - 292,683 shares; Ir oquois Master Fund Ltd. - 292,683 shares; Opus Point Healthcare Value Fund, LP - 292,683 shares; Scott Soules - 292,683 shares; Rosalind Advisors, Inc. - 292,680 shares; Ugo Di Francesco - 288,000 shares; DAFNA LifeScience Ltd. – 225,000 shares; Rockmore Investment Master Fund Ltd. - 219,512 shares; DAK Investments Corp. - 219,512 shares; Parallax Biomedical Fund - 210,000 shares; DAFNA LifeScience Market Neutral Ltd. - 184,390 shares; Robert J. Rubin - 146,341 shares; Richard Molinsky - 122,927 shares; Boris Volman - 120,000 shares; John Raphael - 120,000 shares; Michele Whalen - 120,000 shares; Robert Kessler - 120,000 shares; Mauro Bove - 90,000 shares; Marco Codella - 90,000 shares; Warren Holmes - 78,000 shares; Michael & Melissa Eustace - 73,171 shares; David A. Dent- 72,000 shares; John Raphael, Tara Raphael 2005 Trust - 60,000 shares; John Raphael, Michael Raphael 2008 Trust - 60,000 shares; Judith Raphael IRA - 60,000 shares; Freestone Advantage Partners, LP - 36,586 shares; Marc Tewe y - 30,000 shares; Brian D. Schreiber, M.D. - 29,268 shares; Donald R. DeLillo - 21,951 shares; Taha Keilani - 15,000 shares; and Gianfranco Fornasini - 15,000 shares.
(3)        Gregg Lapointe, Paolo Cavazza and Claudio Cavazza exercise shared voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(4)        Paolo Cavazza exercises sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by Chaumiere SARL.
(5)        Steven Salamon exercises sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by Rosalind Capital Partners L.P.
(6)        Lorenzo Wullschleger, Emilio Martinenghi and Giovanni Manzini exercise shared voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by Wullschleger Martinenghi Manzini Holding S.A.
(7)        Nathan Fischel, MD, CFA and Fariba Ghodsian, Ph.D. exercise shared voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by DAFNA LifeScience Select Ltd.
(8)        Michael S. Weiss exercises sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by Opus Point Healthcare Innovations Fund, LP.
(9)        Adam Gurney exercises sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by Kingsbridge Capital Ltd.
(10)       
Downsview Capital, Inc. (“Downsview”) is the general partner of Cranshire Capital, L.P. (“Cranshire”) and consequently has voting control and investment discretion over securities held by Cranshire. Mitchell P. Kopin (“Mr. Kopin”), President of Downsview, has voting control over Downsview. As a result of the foregoing, each of Mr. Kopin and Downsview may be deemed to have beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of the shares of common stock beneficially owned by Cranshire.
(11)       Steven Salamon exercises sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by BioHedge Holdings Limited.
(12)        Michael S. Weiss exercises sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by Opus Point Healthcare (Low Net) Fund, LP.
(13)Chaim Davis exercises sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by Revach Fund LP.
(14)Shaye Hirsch exercises sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by Brio Capital LP.
(15)
Iroquois Capital Management L.L.C. ("Iroquois Capital") is the investment manager of Iroquois Master Fund, Ltd ("IMF"). Consequently, Iroquois Capital has voting control and investment discretion over securities held by IMF. As Joshua Silverman and Richard Abbe make voting and investment decisions on behalf of Iriquois Capital in its capacity as investment manager to IMF, they may be deemed to have voting control and investment discretion over securities held by IMF. As a result of the foregoing, each of Iroquois Capital, Mr. Silverman and Mr. Abbe may be deemed to have beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of the securities held by IMF.
(16)Michael S. Weiss exercises sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by Opus Point Healthcare Value Fund, LP.
(17)Steven Salamon exercises sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by Rosalind Advisors, Inc.
(18)Nathan Fischel, MD, CFA and Fariba Ghodsian, Ph.D. exercise shared voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by DAFNA LifeScience Ltd.
(19)Rockmore Capital, LLC (“Rockmore Capital”) serves as the investment manager to Rockmore Investment Master Fund Ltd. (“Rockmore Master Fund”) and in such capacity has investment discretion to vote and dispose of these shares.  Mr. Bruce T. Bernstein and Mr. Brian Daly, as officers of Rockmore Capital, are responsible for the portfolio management decisions of Rockmore Master Fund and may be deemed to have investment discretion over these shares.  Each of Rockmore Capital, Messrs. Bernstein and Daly, disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
(20)Michael S. Weiss exercises sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by DAK Investments Corp.
(21)
Kellie Seringer exercises sole voting and  dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by Parallax Biomedical Fund L.P.
(22)
Nathan Fischel, MD, CFA and Fariba Ghodsian, Ph.D. exercise shared voting and  dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by DAFNA LifeScience Market Neutral Ltd.
(23)John Raphael exercises sole voting and  dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by John Raphael, Tara Raphael 2005 Trust.
(24)John Raphael exercises sole voting and  dispositive power with respect to the shares held of record by John Raphael, Michael Raphael 2008 Trust.
(25)Downsview Capital, Inc. (“Downsview”) is the investment manager for a managed account of Freestone Advantage Partners, LP and consequently has voting control and investment discretion over securities held in such account. Mitchell P. Kopin (“Mr. Kopin”), President of Downsview, has voting control over Downsview. As a result, each of Mr. Kopin and Downsview may be deemed to have beneficial ownership (as determined under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) of the shares held in such account which are being registered hereunder.

This prospectus relates to shares of our common stock that may be offered and sold from time to time by the Selling Stockholders. We will receive no proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock in this offering. However, we may receive up to approximately $4.8 million in proceeds from the exercise of the warrants to purchase our common stock. We intend to use the net proceeds from the exercise of the warrants as working capital to cover costs associated with the completion of the confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial for orBec®, other research and development expenses, and general overhead costs including salaries until such time, if ever, as we are able to generate a positive cash flow from operations.


The Selling Stockholders and anyWe are offering up to _______ Units, to be issued in one or more closings, each consisting of their pledgees, donees, transferees, assignees and successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or all of their sharesone share of common stock on any stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private transactions.  These sales may be at fixed or negotiated prices.  The Selling Stockholders may use any one or more of the following methods when selling shares:
·  ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits investors;
·  block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;
·  purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;
·  an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;
·  privately negotiated transactions;
·  to cover short sales and other hedging transactions made after the date that the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission;
·  broker-dealers may agree with the Selling Stockholders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;
·  a combination of any such methods of sale; and
·  any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.
The Selling Stockholders may also sell shares under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, if available, rather than under this prospectus.
Broker-dealers engaged by the Selling Stockholders may arrange for other brokers-dealersand warrants to participate in sales.  Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the Selling Stockholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the investor of shares, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated.  The Selling Stockholders do not expect these commissions and discounts to exceed what is customary in the types of transactions involved.
The Selling Stockholders may from time to time pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the Shares owned by them and, if they default in the performance of their secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell sharespurchase an additional ____ share of common stock from timefor $____ per Unit with aggregate gross proceeds of  $________.  Pursuant to time underan engagement letter agreement, we engaged ________ as our placement agent for this prospectus,offering. _____  is not purchasing or under an amendmentselling any Units, nor are they required to arrange for the purchase and sale of any specific number or dollar amount of Units, other than to use their “best efforts” to arrange for the sale of Units by us. Therefore, we may not sell the entire amount of Units being offered.  Additionally, we and the placement agent may, upon request of any investor in this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) oroffering, sell Units to such investors that exclude the warrants, provided that the sale of Units that exclude such warrants shall be at the same offering price per Unit as all other applicable provisioninvestors.

Upon the completion of all closings of the Securities Actoffering, we will pay the placement agent a cash transaction fee equal to ____% of 1933 amending the listgross proceeds to us from the sale of Selling Stockholdersthe Units in the offering. In addition, we agreed to includegrant the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as Selling Stockholders under this prospectus.

The Selling Stockholders also may transfer the shares of our common stock equal to ____% of the number of Units sold by us in other circumstances,the offering.  The compensation warrants will have the same terms as the warrants issued to the public in which case the transferees, pledgees or other successors in interestoffering and will be subject to FINRA Rule 5110(g)(1) in that for a period of six months after the selling beneficial ownersissuance date of the compensation warrants (which shall not be earlier than the closing date of the offering pursuant to which the compensation warrants are being issued), neither the compensation warrants nor any warrant shares issued upon exercise of the compensation warrants shall be (A) sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, or hypothecated, or (B) the subject of any hedging, short sale, derivative, put, or call transaction that would result in the effective economic disposition of the securities by any person for purposesa period of this prospectus.180 days immediately following the date of effectiveness or commencement of sales of the offering pursuant to which the compensation warrants are being issued, except the transfer of any security as permitted by FINRA rules.

The Selling Stockholders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the sharesplacement agent may be deemed to be "underwriters"an underwriter within the meaning of Section 2(a)(11) of the Securities Act in connection with such sales.  In such event,and any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agentsit and any profit realized on the resalesale of the shares purchasedsecurities by them maywhile acting as principal might be deemed to be underwriting commissionsdiscounts or discountscommissions under the Securities Act.  Discounts, concessions, commissionsThe placement agent would be required to comply with the requirements of the Securities Act and similar selling expenses, if any, that can be attributedthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including, without limitation, Rule 10b-5 and Regulation M under the Exchange Act.  These rules and regulations may limit the timing of purchases and sales of shares of common stock and warrants to the salepurchase shares of securities will be paidcommon stock by the Selling Stockholders and/placement agent.  Under these rules and regulations, the placement agent may not (i) engage in any stabilization activity in connection with our securities; and (ii) bid for or the purchaserspurchase any of the securities.
Each Selling Stockholder that is affiliated with a registered broker-dealer has confirmedour securities or attempt to us that, at the time it acquired the securities subject to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, it did not have any agreement or understanding, directly or indirectly, withinduce any person to distributepurchase any of such securities.  our securities, other than as permitted under the Exchange Act, until they have completed their participation in the distribution.

The Company has advised each Selling Stockholderplacement agent agreement provides that it may not use shares registered on the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part to cover short sales of our common stock made prior to the date on which such registration statement was declared effective by the SEC.
We are required to pay certain fees and expenses incident to the registration of the shares.  We have agreed towe will indemnify the Selling Stockholdersplacement agent against certain losses, claims, damages andspecified liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. We agreed to keep this prospectus effective untilhave been advised that, in the earlieropinion of (i) the date on which the shares may be resold by the Selling Stockholders without registrationSecurities and without regard to any volume limitations by reason of Rule 144(e)Exchange Commission, indemnification for liabilities under the Securities Act or any other rule of similar effectis against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and (ii) such time as all ofis therefore unenforceable.  The placement agent agreement also provides that the shares have been publicly sold.agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days prior written notice.



Our authorized capital stock consists of 405,000,00050,250,000 shares of capital stock, of which 400,000,00050,000,000 shares are common stock, par value $0.001 per share, 4,500,000225,000 shares are preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, 200,000of which 10,000 are Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.05 per share, 200,00010,000 shares are Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.05 per share, and 100,0005,000 are Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of June 22, 2010,October 31, 2012, there were issued and outstanding 215,773,38711,160,513 shares of common stock, options to purchase 18,685,4141,475,224 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 59,793,6842,576,341 shares of common stock.  The amount outstanding includesdoes not include the 28,752,571_______ shares of common stock issuedor the _______ shares of common stock underlying to warrants to be included in the Selling Stockholders._______ Units.

Common Stock

Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held in the election of directors and in all other matters to be voted on by the stockholders.  There is no cumulative voting in the election of directors.  Holders of common stock are entitled to receive dividends as may be declared from time to time by our board of directors out of funds legally available therefor. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the corporation, holders of common stock are to share in all assets remaining after the payment of liabilities.  Holders of common stock have no pre-emptive or conversion rights and are not subject to further calls or assessments.  There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock.  The rights of the holders of the com moncommon stock are subject to any rights that may be fixed for holders of preferred stock.  All of the outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and non-assessable.

Preferred Stock

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of 4,500,000225,000 shares of preferred stock with designations, rights, and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the board of directors.  The board of directors is empowered, without stockholder approval, to designate and issue additional series of preferred stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting or other rights, including the right to issue convertible securities with no limitations on conversion, which could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of our common stock, substantially dilute a common stockholder’sstockholder's interest and depress the price of our common stock.

No shares of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock or the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock are outstanding.

Anti-Takeover Provisions

Provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation, by-laws and stockholder rights plan may discourage certain types of transactions involving an actual or potential change of control of the Company which might be beneficial to us or our securityholders.security holders.

As noted above, our Certificate of Incorporation permits our board of directors to issue shares of any class or series of preferred stock in the future without stockholder approval and upon such terms as our board of directors may determine. The rights of the holders of common stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any class or series of preferred stock that may be issued in the future.

Our bylaws generally provide that any board vacancy, including a vacancy resulting from an increase in the authorized number of directors, may be filled by a majority of the directors, even if less than a quorum.

Additionally, our bylaws provide that stockholders must provide timely notice in writing to bring business before an annual meeting of shareholders or to nominate candidates for election as directors at an annual meeting of shareholders.  Notice for an annual meeting is timely if our Secretary receives the written notice not less than 45 days and no more than 75 days prior to the anniversary of the date that we mailed proxy materials for the preceding year’syear's annual meeting. However, if the date of the annual meeting is advanced more than thirty (30) days prior to, or delayed by more than thirty (30) days after, the anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be delivered not later than the close of business on the later of (i) the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or (ii) the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made.  Our bylaws also specify the form and content of a shareholder's notice. These provisions may prevent shareholders from bringing matters before an annual meeting of shareholders or from making nominations for directors at an annual meeting of shareholders.


Shareholder Rights Plan

On June 22, 2007, our board of directors declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock.  Each Right entitles the registered holder to purchase one one-thousandth of a share of our Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock at a price of $3.70 per one one-thousandth of a share, subject to certain adjustments.  Initially, the rights are not exercisable, but become exercisable upon the earlier of (i) 10 days following a public announcement that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons, with certain exceptions, has acquired beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the then outstanding common stock or (ii) 10 business days following the commencement of, or announcement of an intention to make, a tender offer or exchange offer the consummation of which w ouldwould result in the beneficial ownership by a person or group of 15% or more of such outstanding common stock.

Our board may redeem all of the rights for $0.001 per right at any time before the earlier of (i) the time the rights become exercisable or (ii) July 1, 2017, the date the rights expire.

If the board declares or pays dividends on common stock, the holders of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock would be entitled to receive a per share dividend payment of 1,000 times the dividend declared per share of common stock.  In the event we make a distribution on the common stock, the holders of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock will be entitled to a per share distribution, in like kind, of 1,000 times such distribution made per share of common stock.  In the event of any merger, consolidation or other transaction in which shares of common stock are exchanged, each share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive 1,000 times the amount received per share of common stock.  These rights are protected by customary antidilution provisions.

Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up, no distribution may be made to the holders of shares of stock ranking junior to the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock unless the holders of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock have received the greater of (i) $3.70 per one one-thousandth share plus an amount equal to accrued and unpaid dividends and distributions thereon, and (ii) an amount equal to 1,000 times the aggregate amount to be distributed per share to holders of common stock.  Further, no distribution may be made to the holders of stock ranking on a parity upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up with the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, unless distributions are made ratably on the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock and all other shares of such parity stock in pro portionproportion to the total amounts to which the holders of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock are entitled above and to which the holders of such parity shares are entitled.

The holders of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock will have 1,000 votes per share of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders, including the election of directors.

MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Our common stock is quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”)OTCQB under the symbol "SNGX." Prior to September 30, 2009, around the time of our corporate name change, our stock was quoted under the symbol “DORB.” The following table sets forth, as adjusted for the reverse stock split of 1-for-20 effective February 1, 2012, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per share of our common stock as reported by the OTCBB.OTC Market Group.

 Price Range  Price Range 
Period High  Low  High  Low 
Year Ended December 31, 2008: 
Year Ended December 31, 2010:Year Ended December 31, 2010: 
First Quarter
 $0.25  $0.16  $5.80  $4.60 
Second Quarter
 $0.19  $0.11  $6.00  $4.80 
Third Quarter
 $0.15  $0.09  $5.20  $3.60 
Fourth Quarter
 $0.12  $0.04  $4.60  $3.00 
Year Ended December 31, 2009: 
Year Ended December 31, 2011:Year Ended December 31, 2011: 
First Quarter
 $0.18  $0.06  $4.40  $3.20 
Second Quarter
 $0.24  $0.09  $5.20  $3.60 
Third Quarter
 $0.38  $0.17  $6.80  $0.80 
Fourth Quarter
 $0.36  $0.18  $1.00  $0.60 
Year Ending December 31, 2010: 
Year Ending December 31, 2012:Year Ending December 31, 2012: 
First Quarter
 $0.30  $0.23  $1.01  $0.44 
Second Quarter
 $0.53  $0.23 
Third Quarter
 $0.55  $0.26 

As of June 22, 2010,October 31, 2012, the last reported price of our common stock quoted on the OTCBBOTCQB was $0.26$0.44 per share. The OTCBBOTCQB prices set forth above represent inter-dealer quotations, without adjustment for retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent the prices of actual transactions. As of June 22, 2010,October 31, 2012, we have approximately 1,015950 stockholders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

We have never declared nor paid any cash dividends, and currently intend to retain all our cash and any earnings for use in our business and, therefore, do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.  Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.


DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES
ACT LIABILITIES

Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law allows companies to limit the personal liability of its directors to the company or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of a fiduciary duty.  Article IX of the Company’sCompany's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, provides for the limitation of personal liability of the directors of the Company as follows:

"A Director of the Corporation shall have no personal liability to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of his fiduciary duty as a Director; provided, however, this Article shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a Director (i) for any breach of the Director’sDirector's duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders; (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; (iii) for the unlawful payment of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases under Section 174 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware; or (iv) for any transaction from which the Director derived an improper personal benefit. If the General Corporation Law is amended after approval by the stockholders of this Article to authorize corporate action fur therfurther eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors, then the liability of a director of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as so amended."

Article VIII of the Company’sCompany's Bylaws, as amended and restated, provide for indemnification of directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, the registrant has been informed that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is therefore unenforceable.


The audited consolidated financial statementsbalance sheets of Soligenix, Inc. as of December 31, 2011 and subsidiaries included2010 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the Registration Statementtwo-year period ended December 31, 2011 have been audited by Amper, Politziner & Mattia,EisnerAmper LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as set forthstated in their report appearing herein.  Such financial statements have been so includedwhich is incorporated herein, in reliance uponon the reportsreport of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The independent registered public accounting firm named above has no interest in the prospectus.


The validity of the shares of our common stock offered by the Selling Stockholdershereby will be passed upon by the law firm of Edwards AngellWildman Palmer & Dodge LLP, West Palm Beach, Florida.


We have filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C. 20549, under the Securities Act of 1933, a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respectrelating to the securitiesUnits offered by this prospectus.hereby. This prospectus which forms a part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement as permitted byand the rulesexhibits and regulations of the SEC.schedules thereto.  For further information with respect to usour company and the securities offeredUnits we are offering by this prospectus, reference is madeyou should refer to the registration statement.statement, including the exhibits and schedules thereto. You may inspect a copy of the registration statement without charge at the Public Reference Section of the Securities and Exchange Commission at Room 1024, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549.  The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  The Securities and Exchange Commission's World Wide Web address is http://www.sec.gov.

Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document that we have filed as an exhibit to the registration statement are qualified in their entirety by reference to the exhibits for a complete statement of their terms and conditions.

We file electronicallyperiodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of 15(d)in accordance with requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such reports, the registration statement and other information may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 on official business days during the hours of 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains a web site at http://www.sec.gov that containsAct. These periodic reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically withare available for inspection and copying at the SEC.

regional offices, public reference facilities and Internet site of the Securities and Exchange Commission referred to above. We make available through our website, free of charge, copies of these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish them to the SEC.Securities and Exchange Commission. Our website is located at http://www.soligenix.com. You can also request copies of such documents, free of charge, by contacting the company at (609) 538-8200 or sending an email to info@soligenix.com. Our

Information contained on our website is not a prospectus and does not constitute a part of this prospectus.

You should rely only on the information contained in or incorporated by reference or provided in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone else to provide you with different information. We are not making an offer of these securities in any state where the offer is not permitted. You should not assume the information in this prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date on the front of this prospectus.
 

SOLIGENIX, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Table of Contents

 
 


  March 31, 2010  December 31, 2009 
  (Unaudited)    
Assets      
 Current assets:        
        Cash and cash equivalents $5,931,958  $7,692,011 
        Grants receivable  57,028   23,632 
        Inventory, net  40,053   42,865 
        Prepaid expenses  146,342   141,313 
Total current assets  6,175,381   7,899,821 
         
Office furniture and equipment, net  20,381   21,172 
Intangible assets, net  1,109,776   1,463,289 
Total assets $7,305,538  $9,384,282 
         
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity        
Current liabilities:        
        Accounts payable $961,665  $844,857 
        Accrued compensation  31,190   365,199 
Total current liabilities  992,855   1,210,056 
Commitments and contingencies        
Shareholders’ equity:        
       Preferred stock; 5,000,000 shares authorized;
       none issued or outstanding
  -   - 
       Common stock, $.001 par value;  400,000,000 shares
     authorized;186,888,036 shares and 185,655,720 shares
     issued and outstanding in 2010 and 2009, respectively
  186,888   185,656 
       Additional paid-in capital  116,614,255   116,340,770 
       Accumulated deficit  (110,488,460)  (108,352,200)
Total shareholders’ equity  6,312,683   8,174,226 
         
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $7,305,538  $9,384,282 
 
  
June 30,
2012
  December 31, 2011 
  (Unaudited)    
Assets
Current assets:
      
        Cash and cash equivalents $4,431,288  $5,996,668 
        Grants receivable  239,599   362,473 
        Other receivable  -   574,157 
        Prepaid expenses  249,978   195,762 
Total current assets  4,920,865   7,129,060 
         
Office furniture and equipment, net  16,223   15,032 
Intangible assets, net  974,377   1,079,566 
Total assets $5,911,465  $8,223,658 
         
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity        
Current liabilities:        
        Accounts payable $1,219,568  $1,303,555 
        Accrued compensation  71,486   129,061 
Total current liabilities  1,291,054   1,432,616 
         
Commitments and contingencies
 
        
Shareholders’ equity:        
       Preferred stock;  250,000 shares authorized;
          none issued or outstanding
  -   - 
       Common stock, $.001  par value;  50,000,000 shares and 20,000,000 in 2011 authorized; 11,132,544 shares and 11,105,532 shares issued
          and outstanding in 2012 and 2011, respectively
  11,133   11,106 
       Additional paid-in capital  125,145,284   124,897,309 
       Accumulated deficit  (120,536,006)  (118,117,373)
Total shareholders’ equity  4,620,411   6,791,042 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $5,911,465  $8,223,658 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 
 

 
 Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 
 2010  2009  2012 2011 2012 2011 
                
Revenues, principally from grants $335,796  $530,317  $762,851  $405,820  $1,410,269  $1,213,825 
Cost of revenues  273,773   417,309   (616,330)  (349,511)  (1,172,901)  (903,548)
Gross profit  62,023   113,008   146,521   56,309   237,368   310,277 
                 
Operating expenses:                 
Research and development  1,598,291   1,590,999   500,980   1,513,722   1,377,774   2,886,526 
General and administrative  538,097   532,137   627,218   475,377   1,282,261   1,079,387 
Stock-based compensation - research and development   40,204   73,390 
Stock-based compensation - general and administrative   22,059   72,450 
         
Total operating expenses  2,198,651   2,268,976   1,128,198   1,989,099   2,660,035   3,965,913 
                 
Loss from operations  (2,136,628)  (2,155,968)  (981,677)  (1,932,790)  (2,422,667)  (3,655,636)
                 
Other income:                 
Interest income  1,691   11,190 
Interest expense  (1,323)  (318)
        
Total other income  368   10,872 
Interest income, net  1,799   1,473   4,034   3,908 
Net loss $(2,136,260) $(2,145,096) $(979,878) $(1,931,317) $(2,418,633) $(3,651,728)
                 
Basic and diluted net loss per share $( 0.01) $(0.01) $(0.09) $(0.18) $(0.22) $(0.34)
                 
Basic and diluted weighted average
common shares outstanding
  186,513,653   148,911,114   11,124,359   10,899,902   11,121,814   10,871,249 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 
 

  Common Stock  Additional Paid-In  Accumulated    
  Shares  Par Value  Capital  Deficit  Total 
                
Balance, December 31, 2009  185,655,720  $185,656  $116,340,770  $(108,352,200) $8,174,226 
 
Issuance of common stock pursuant to equity line agreement – Fusion
  294,091   294   69,706   -   70,000 
 
Issuance of common stock to vendors
  403,225   403   104,435   -   104,838 
 
Issuance of common stock warrants to vendors
  -   -   1,916   -   1,916 
 
Issuance of common stock for option and warrant exercises
  535,000   535   35,165   -   35,700 
Stock-based compensation expense  -   -   62,263   -   62,263 
Net loss  -   -   -   ( 2,136,260)  (2,136,260)
Balance, March 31, 2010  186,888,036  $186,888  $116,614,255  $(110,488,460) $6,312,683 
  Common Stock  
Additional
Paid-In
  Accumulated    
  Shares  Par Value  Capital  Deficit  Total 
                
Balance, December 31, 2011  11,105,532  $11,106  $124,897,309  $(118,117,373) $6,791,042 
                     
Issuance of restricted common stock to employee  16,667   17   9,983   -   10,000 
                     
Issuance of common stock to vendor  10,345   10   2,990   -   3,000 
                     
Stock-based compensation expense  -   -   235,002   -   235,002 
                     
Net loss  -   -   -   (2,418,633)  (2,418,633)
                     
Balance, June 30, 2012  11,132,544  $11,133  $125,145,284  $(120,536,006) $4,620,411 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 
 

 2010  2009  2012 2011 
Operating activities:            
Net loss $(2,136,260) $(2,145,096) $(2,418,633) $(3,651,728)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:             
Amortization and depreciation  46,252   39,934   108,753   105,443 
        
Stock or warrants issued in exchange for services  106,754   490,227 
        
        
Common stock or warrants issued in exchange for services  3,000   11,184 
Restricted Stock issued to employee  10,000   - 
Stock-based compensation  62,263   145,840   235,002   388,636 
Capitalized patent write-off  378,501   - 
Change in operating assets and liabilities:             
Grants receivable  (33,396  129,188   122,874   (215,773)
Inventory  2,812   2,812 
Other receivable  574,157   247,542 
Prepaid expenses  (5,029)  10,765   (54,216  95,859 
Accounts payable  116,808   (76,992  (83,987  (300,201)
Accrued compensation  (334,009)  (203,286  (57,575)  (187,279
Total adjustments
  340,956   538,488   858,008   145,411 
Net cash used in operating activities  (1,795,304)  (1,606,608)  (1,560,625)  (3,506,317)
             
Investing activities:             
             
Acquisition of intangible assets  (69,502)  (46,622)  -   (112,398)
Purchase of office equipment  (947)  (4,069)  (4,755  - 
Net cash used in investing activities  (70,449)  (50,691)  (4,755)  (112,398)
             
Financing activities:             
Net proceeds from sale of common stock  -   6,690,200 
Proceeds from sale of common stock pursuant to equity line  70,000   5,001   -   255,000 
        
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants  35,700   -   -   68,750 
Net cash provided by financing activities  105,700   6,695,201   -   323,750 
             
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (1,760,053)  5,037,902 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (1,565,380)  (3,294,965)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  7,692,011   1,475,466   5,996,668   7,451,714 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $5,931,958  $6,513,368  $4,431,288  $4,156,749 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 
 
F-4

 


Note 1. Nature of Business

Basis of Presentation

Soligenix, Inc. (the “Company”) iswas incorporated in Delaware in 1987.  We are a late-stagedevelopment stage biopharmaceutical company that was incorporated in 1987 and is focused on developing products to treat the life-threatening side effects of cancer treatments and serious gastrointestinal diseases where there remains an unmet medical need, as well as developing several biodefense vaccines and therapeutics. The Company maintainsWe maintain two active business segments: BioTherapeutics and Vaccines/BioDefense. Soligenix’s

Our BioTherapeutics business segment intends to develop orBec® (oraloral beclomethasone dipropionate or oral(oral BDP) for indications such as pediatric Crohn’s disease and other biotherapeutic products, including LPMTM-Leuprolide. Soligenix’s acute radiation enteritis. Our Vaccines/BioDefense business segment intends to convert itsincludes active development programs for RiVax™, our ricin toxin vaccine, and VeloThrax™, our anthrax vaccine, and OrbeShield™, our gastrointestinal acute radiation injury programs from early stage development tosyndrome (“GI ARS”) therapeutic. The advanced development of our vaccine programs is currently supported by our heat stabilization technology, known as ThermoVax™, under existing and manufacturing.on-going government grant funding.

The Company generates revenues primarily from the National Institutes of Health (the “NIH”) under threefour active grants and could generate license fees from its collaboration partner Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Sigma-Tau”),  and from its Named Patient Access Program (“NPAP”) partners for orBec®.by achieving certain milestones.

The Company is subject to risks common to companies in the biotechnology industry including, but not limited to, development of new technological innovations, dependence on key personnel, protections of proprietary technology, compliance with FDA regulations, litigation, and product liability.

The consolidated financial statements are presented on the basis of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The accompanying consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements have been condensed or omitted from this report, as is permitted by such rules and regulations; however, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The unaudited consolidated financial statements and related disclosures have been prepared with the presumption that users of the interim financial information have read or have access to the audited financial statements for the preceding fi scal year. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. The Company has experienced significant quarterly fluctuations in operating results and it expects those fluctuations will continue.

Liquidity

As of March 31, 2010,June 30, 2012, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $5,931,958$4,431,288 as compared to $7,692,011$5,996,668 as of December 31, 2009,2011, representing ana decrease of $1,760,053$1,565,380 or 23%26%. As of March 31, 2010,June 30, 2012, the Company had working capital of $5,182,526$3,629,811 as compared to working capital of $6,689,765$5,696,444 as of December 31, 2009,2011, representing a decrease of $1,507,239$2,066,633 or 23%36%. The decrease in cash and working capital was primarily the result of cash used in operating activities over the six month period. For the threesix months ended March 31, 2010,June 30, 2012, the Company’s cash used in operating activities was $1,795,304$1,560,625 as compared to $1,606,608$3,506,317 for the same period in 2009. This increase in spending was attributable2011, representing a decrease of $1,945,692. The decrease is primarily related to the conducttermination of the confirmatory PhaseCompany’s pivotal phase 3 clinical trial of orBec® inwith Orbec® for the treatment of acute GI GVHD.

F-5

An outline of our business strategy follows:
 
Management’s business strategy can be outlined as follows:

·  
complete the pivotalInitiate a Phase 3 confirmatory clinical trial for orBec® in the treatment of acute gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host disease (“GI GVHD”);
·  
identify a development and marketing partner for orBec® for territories outside of North America, as we have granted an exclusive license to Sigma-Tau to commercialize orBec® in the U.S., Canada and Mexico;
·  
complete the Phase 1/2 clinical trial of orBec® for the prevention of acute GVHD;
oral BDP, known as SGX203, in pediatric Crohn’s disease;
·  evaluate and initiate additional clinical trials to exploreEvaluate the effectiveness of oralorBec®/Oral BDP in other therapeutic indications involving inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal (“GI”) tract such as prevention of acute radiation enteritis radiation injury and Crohn’s disease;treatment of chronic GI GVHD;
·  reinitiate development ofDevelop RiVax™ and VeloThrax™ in combination with our other BioTherapeutics products, suchproprietary vaccine heat stabilization technology, known as LPM™ Leuprolide;
·  continueThermoVax™, to secure additional government funding for each of our BioTherapeuticsdevelop new heat stable vaccines in biodefense and BioDefense programs through grants, contracts and/or procurements;
·  convert our biodefense vaccine programs from early stage development to advanced development and manufacturinginfectious diseases with the potential to collaborate and/or partner with other companies in the biodefense area;these areas;
·  acquireContinue to apply for and secure additional government funding for each of our BioTherapeutics and Vaccines/BioDefense programs through grants, contracts and/or procurements;
Acquire or in-license new clinical-stage compounds for development; and
·  exploreExplore other business development and acquisition strategies.
 
Based on the Company’s current rate of cash outflows, cash on hand, the timely collection of milestone payments under collaboration agreements, proceeds from our grantits grant-funded programs, reductions in headcount and potential minimalexpected proceeds from the Fusion Capital transaction,State of New Jersey Technology Business Tax Certificate Transfer Program, management believes that its current cash will be sufficient to meet theits anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures into the secondfourth quarter of 2011.2013.
F-5


The Company’s plans with respect to its liquidity management include the following:

·  The Company has $9.6instituted a cost reduction plan which has reduced headcount and will continue to reduce costs wherever possible.
The Company has approximately $5.0 million in active grant funding still available to support its associated research programs in 2010 and beyond.  Additionally, theinto 2014. The Company has submittedplans to submit additional grant applications for further support of theseits programs and others with various funding agencies, and received encouraging feedback to date on the likelihood of funding.agencies.
·  The Company has continued to use equity instruments to provide a portion of the compensation due to vendors and collaboration partners and expects to continue to do so for the foreseeable future.
·  The Company has approximately $7.7 millionwill pursue sales of Net Operating Losses (“NOL”) in available capacity underthe State of New Jersey, pursuant to its Fusion Capital equity facility.  AlthoughTechnology Business Tax Certificate Transfer Program. Based on the receipt of $574,157 in proceeds from the sale of NJ NOL in 2011, the Company has historically drawn down modest amounts under this agreement,expects to participate in the Company could draw more within certain contractual parameters.program during 2012 and beyond; and
·  The Company may seek additional capital in the private and/or public equity markets to continue its operations, respond to competitive pressures, develop new products and services, and to support new strategic partnerships. The Company is currently evaluating additional equity financing opportunities and may execute them when appropriate. However, there can be no assurances that the Company can consummate such a transaction, or consummate a transaction at favorable pricing.
Reverse Stock Split

On February 1, 2012, the Company completed a reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock at a ratio of 1-for-20, whereby, every 20 shares of its common stock was exchanged for one share of its common stock. Its common stock began trading on the OTCQB on a reverse split basis on February 2, 2012. All share and per share data have been restated to reflect this reverse stock split.
F-6

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The following list includes only updates to the Company’s significant accounting policies. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements include Soligenix, Inc., and its wholly and majority owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated as a result of consolidation.

Operating Segments

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated on a regular basis by the related notes thereto includedchief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and in assessing the performance of the segment. The Company divides its operations into two operating segments: BioTherapeutics and Vaccines/BioDefense.
Grants Receivable

Grants receivable consist of unbilled amounts due from various grants from the NIH for costs incurred prior to the period end under reimbursement contracts. The amounts were billed to the NIH in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-Kmonth subsequent to period end and collected shortly thereafter. The Company considers the grants receivable to be fully collectible. Accordingly, no allowance for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
doubtful amounts has been established. If amounts become uncollectible, they are charged to operations.

Intangible Assets

One of the most significant estimates or judgments that the Company makes is whether to capitalize or expense patent and license costs. The Company makes this judgment based on whether the technology has alternative future uses, as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)(“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)(“ASC”) 730, Research and Development. Based on this consideration, the Company capitalizes payments made to legal firms that are engaged in filing and protecting rights to intellectual property and rights for ourits current products in both the domestic and international markets. The Company believes that patent rights are one of its most valuable assets. Patents and patent applications are a key component of intellectual property, especially in the early stage of prod uctproduct development, as their purchase and maintenance gives the Company access to key product development rights from Soligenix’s academic and industrial partners. These rights can also be sold or sub-licensed as part of its strategy to partner its products at each stage of development as the intangible assets have alternative future use. The legal costs incurred for these patents consist of work designed to protect, preserve, maintainassociated with filing new patents and perhaps extendextending the lives of the patents. The Company capitalizes such costs and amortizes intangibles over their expected useful life – generally a period of 11 to 16 years.

During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company incurred $378,501 in a one-time patent write off cost related to its anticipated return
F-6


The Company did not incur any capitalized $69,502 and $46,622patent related costs during the six months ended June 30, 2012; the Company capitalized $112,398 in patent related costs during the threesix months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.June 30, 2011.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Office furniture, and equipment and intangible assets are evaluatedreviewed and reviewedevaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company recognizes impairment of long-lived assets in the event the net book value of such assets exceeds the estimated future undiscounted cash flows attributable to such assets. If the sum of the expected undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of the related asset or group of assets, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the related asset or group of assets. Such analyses necessarily involve significant judgment.

The Company did not record any impairment of long-lived assets for the threesix months ended March 31, 2010June 30, 2012 or 2009.2011.

InventoryFair Value of Financial Instruments

InventoriesAccounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. require that fair values be disclosed for the Company’s financial instruments. The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, which include grants receivable and current liabilities, are stated at the lowerconsidered to be representative of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method and includes the cost of materials and overhead. Inventory consists of finished goods related to the orBec® NPAP. The Company records an allowance as needed for excess inventory.  During the year ended December 31, 2009 an allowance of $150,000 was provided. This allowance will be evaluated on a quarterly basis and adjustments will be made as required. The Company did not make an adjustment to this allowance during the three months ended March 31, 2010.their respective fair values.

Revenue Recognition

ThePrincipally all of the Company’s revenues are generated from NIH grants and revenues from licensing activities and the achievement of licensing milestones and NPAP sales(in prior periods). Recording of orBecrevenue is applied in accordance with FASB ASC 605, ®Revenue Recognition, ASC 605-25 and/or Accounting Standard Update, ASU, 2009-13, Revenue Recognition – Multiple Element Arrangements. The revenue from NIH grants areis based upon subcontractor costs and internal costs incurred that are specifically covered by the grants, plus a facilities and administrative rate that provides funding for overhead expenses. These revenues are recognized when expenses have been incurred by subcontractors or when the Company incurs internal expenses that are related to the grant. Licensing and associated milestone revenues are recorded when earned. Revenue from NPAP sales

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred in accordance with FASB ASC 730, Research and Development. Research and development includes costs such as clinical trial expenses, contracted research and license agreement fees with no alternative future use, supplies and materials, salaries stock based compensation, employee benefits, equipment depreciation and allocation of orBec® are recognized whenvarious corporate costs. Purchased in-process research and development expense represents the productvalue assigned or paid for acquired research and development for which there is shipped.no alternative future use as of the date of acquisition.
F-7


Stock-Based Compensation

From time to time, the Company issues restricted shares of common stock to vendors and consultants as compensation for services performed. Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the fair value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period. Typically these instruments vest upon issuance and therefore the entire stock compensation expense is recognized upon issuance to the vendors and/or consultants.

Stock options are issued with an exercise price equal to the market price on the date of issuance. Stock options issued to directors upon re-election vest quarterly for a period of one year (new director issuances are fully vested upon issuance.issuance). Stock options issued to employees generally vest 25% upfront,immediately as of the grant date, then 25% each subsequent year for a period of three years. Stock options vest over each three month period from the date of issuance to the end of the three year period. These options have a ten year life for as long as the individuals remain employees or directors. In general when an employee or director terminates their position the options will expire within sixthree months, unless otherwise extended by the Board.

F-7


·  a dividend yield of 0%;
·  an expected life of 4 years;
·  volatilities of 129% and 125% for 2010 and 2009, respectively; and
·  risk-free interest rates of 1.9% and 3.7% in 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The Company estimates these values based on the assumptions that have been historically available. The fair value of each option grant made during 2010 and 2009 was estimated on the date of each grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and is then amortized ratably over the option’s vesting periods, which approximates the service period. The Company awarded 20,000 and 1,500,000 stock options to new employees and a Board member for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Stock compensation expense for options, warrants and shares of common stock granted to non-employees has been determined in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Stock Compensation, and FASB ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, and represents the fair value of the consideration received, or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever may be more reliably measured. For options that vest over future periods, the fair value of options granted to non-employeesnon-employee directors is amortized as the options vest. The option’s price is re-measured using the Black-Scholes model at the end of each three month reporting period.

Upon exercise, shares are issued fromThe fair value of options in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Stock Compensation, was estimated using the amended 2005 equity incentive planBlack-Scholes option-pricing model and increase the number of shares the Company has outstanding. There were 475,000 shares of stock options exercised and 9,000 shares of stock options that expired during the three months ended March 31, 2010.following weighted-average assumptions:

a dividend yield of 0%;
an expected life of 4 years;
volatility of 160% and 123% for 2012 and 2011, respectively;
forfeitures at a rate of 12%; and
risk-free interest rates of 0.51% and 1.21% in 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding at March 31, 2010 was zero.  The intrinsic value was calculated as the difference between the Company’s common stock closing price on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board at March 31, 2010 and the exercise price of the stock option issued multiplied by the number of shares underlying the stock options. The Company’s common stock price at March 31, 2010 was $0.27.

From time to time, the Company issues common stock to vendors, consultants, and employees as compensation for services performed. These shares are typically issued as restricted stock, unless issued to non-affiliates under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, where the stock may be issued as unrestricted. The restricted stock can only have the restrictive legend removed if the shares underlying the certificate are sold pursuant to an effective registration statement, which the Company must file and have approved by the SEC, if the shares underlying the certificate are sold pursuant to Rule 144, provided certain conditions are satisfied, or if the shares are sold pursuant to another exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period isestimates these values based on the assumptions that have been historically available. The fair value of options granted is estimated on the portiondate of share-based payment awards thateach grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and is ultimately expected to vest duringthen amortized ratably over the option’s vesting periods, which approximates the service period.

F-8

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. A valuation allowance is established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. A review of all available positive and negative evidence is considered, including the Company’s current and past performance, the market environment in which the Company operates, the utilization of past tax credits, and the length of carryback and carryforward periods. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured utilizing tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. No current or deferred income taxes have been provided through March 31, 2010June 30, 2012 due to the net operating losses incurred by the Company since its inception. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions, if any, as part of income tax expense. There were no tax related interest and penalties recorded for 2012 and 2011. Additionally, the Company has not recorded an asset for unrecognized tax benefits or a liability for uncertain tax positions at March 31,June 30, 2012 or 2011. The income tax returns for 2009, 2010 or 2009.and 2011 are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other various taxing authorities, generally for three years after they were filed.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (EPS)(“EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.period as adjusted for the 1-for-20 reverse stock split effective February 1, 2012. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that shared in the earnings of the entity. Since there is a largesignificant number of options and warrants outstanding, fluctuations in the actual market price can have a variety of results for each period presented.
  Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 2010  March 31, 2009 
  Net Loss  Shares  EPS  Net Loss  Shares  EPS 
                   
Basic & Diluted EPS $(2,136,260)  186,513,653  $(0.01) $(2,145,096)  148,911,114  $(0.01)

Options and warrants outstanding at March 31, 2010 and 2009 were 18,847,539 and 17,860,039 of options, and 42,427,874 and 41,233,755 of warrants, respectively. The weighted average exercise price of the Company’s stock options and warrants outstanding at March 31, 2010 were each $0.24 per share. The weighted average exercise price of the Company’s stock options and warrants outstanding at March 31, 2009 were $0.25 and $0.16 per share, respectively. No options andor warrants were included in the 20102012 and 20092011 computations of diluted earnings per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive as a result of losses in each of those years.or options and warrants for which the strike price exceeds the quoted market value at period end.

Recently Issued Accounting StandardsShares issuable upon the exercise of options and warrants outstanding at June 30, 2012 and 2011 were 1,596,898 and 1,376,084 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options, and 2,576,341 and 2,707,819 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrants, respectively. The weighted average exercise price of the Company’s stock options and warrants outstanding at June 30, 2012 were $3.50 and $4.32 per share, respectively. The weighted average exercise price of the Company’s stock options and warrants outstanding at June 30, 2011 were $4.80 and $4.40 per share, respectively.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition – Multiple Element Arrangements, which defines a milestoneUse of Estimates and clarifies whether a vendor may recognize arrangement consideration earned from the achievementAssumptions

The preparation of a milestonefinancial statements in its entiretyconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the period in whichU.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions such as the milestone is achieved.  A milestone is defined as an event for which there is “substantial” uncertainty at the date the arrangement is entered into that the event will be achieved. The consideration earned from the achievementfair value of a milestone is commensurate with either the vendor’s performance to achieve the milestone or the enhancementwarrants, stock options and recovery of the valueuseful life of intangibles that affect the delivered itemreported amounts in the financial statements and relates solely to past performance and is reasonable relative to the deliverables and payment terms wi thin the arrangement. The guidance in this accounting policy does not require use of the milestone method, and instead provides guidance on one method of accounting thataccompanying notes. Actual results could be used to account for the arrangements that fall within its scope.  The effective date of this consensus is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted. The implementation of this standard did not have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.differ from those estimates.

In December 2009, the FASB updated ASC 810, Consolidations, which changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another entity is based on, among other things, the other entity’s purpose and design and the reporting entity’s ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact the other entity’s economic performance.  SFAS No. 167 will require a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A repor ting entity will be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects the reporting entity’s financial statements. SFAS No. 167 is effective at the start of the reporting entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009, or January 1, 2010, for a calendar year-end entity. Early application is not permitted. The implementation of this standard did not have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 3. Office Furniture and Equipment

Office furniture and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over five years. Office and laboratory equipment consisted of the following:
  March 31, 2010  December 31, 2009 
Office equipment $32,514  $31,567 
Office furniture  2,889   2,889 
   35,403   34,456 
Less: Accumulated depreciation  ( 15,022)  (13,284)
Office furniture and equipment, net
 $20,381  $21,172 

Depreciation expense was $1,737 and $2,111 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Note 4.3. Intangible Assets

The following is a summary of intangible assets which consists of licenses and patents:

 
Weighted Average Amortization Period (years)
  
 
Cost
  
Accumulated
Amortization
  
 
Net Book Value
  Weighted Average Amortization Period (years) 
 
Cost
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
 
Net Book Value
 
March 31, 2010            
June 30, 2012         
Licenses  10.5  $462,234  $176,947  $285,287  8.2  $462,234  $238,288  $223,946 
Patents  6.1   1,652,122   827,633   824,489  3.1   1,893,185   1,142,754   750,431 
Total  6.8  $2,114,356  $1,004,580  $1,109,776   4.1  $2,355,419  $1,381,042  $974,377 
December 31, 2009                
December 31, 2011         
Licenses  10.7  $462,234  $170,231  $292,003  8.7  $462,234  $224,708  $237,526 
Patents  6.2   2,077,401   906,115   1,171,286  3.3   1,893,185   1,051,145   842,040 
Total  7.0  $2,539,635  $1,076,346  $1,463,289   4.4  $2,355,419  $1,275,853  $1,079,566 

F-10

Amortization expense was $44,514$49,534 and $37,822$52,208 for the three months ended March 31, 2010June 30, 2012 and 2009, respectively. In addition, during2011, respectively and $105,189 and $101,845 for the threesix months ended March 31, 2010, the Company incurred $378,501 in a one-time patent write off cost related to its anticipated return of the botulinum toxin vaccine licenseJune 30, 2012 and abandonment of related patents. This cost is reflected in research and development expense in the consolidated statement of operations.2011, respectively.

Based on the balance of licenses and patents at March 31, 2010,June 30, 2012, the expected annual amortization expense for each of the succeeding five years is estimated to be as follows:

 Amortization Expense  
Amortization
Expense
 
2010 $187,000 
2011 $187,000 
2012 $187,000  $222,800 
2013 $187,000  $222,800 
2014 $187,000  $222,800 
2015 $222,800 
2016 $83,200 

License fees and royalty payments are expensed annually asif incurred, as the Company does not attribute any future benefits to them other than within that period.

Note 5.4. Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets consist of the following:

         
  
March 31,
 2010
  December 31, 2009 
Net operating loss carry forwards $26,385,000  $24,249,000 
Orphan drug and research and development credit carry forwards  3,339,000   3,339,000 
Other  2,312,000   2,312,000 
Total  32,036,000   29,900,000 
Valuation allowance  (32,036,000)  (29,900,000)
Net deferred tax assets $-  $- 

At December 31, 2009,June 30, 2012, the Company had net operating lossNOLs of approximately $76,000,000 for federal tax purposes and approximately $19,000,000 of New Jersey NOL carry forwards (“NOLs”)remaining after the sale of approximately $82,000,000 for federal and state tax purposes,unused NOL carry forwards, portions of which are currently expiring each year until 2029.2031. In addition, the Company had $3,600,000$3,462,000 of various tax credits that startstarted expiring fromin December 20092011 and will continue to December 2029.expire until 2030. The Company may be able to utilize its NOLs to reduce future federal and state income tax liabilities. However, these NOLs are subject to various limitations under Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 382. IRC Section 382 limits the use of NOLs to the extent there has been an ownership change of more than 50 percentage points. In addition, the NOL carryforwards are subject to examination by the taxing authority and could be adjusted or disallowed due to such exams.&# 160; Although the Company has not undergone an IRC Section 382 analysis, it is likely that the utilization of the NOLs may be substantially limited.

The Company and one or more of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction, and various state and local jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to Federal income tax assessment for years before 2004.2008 and 2007 for New Jersey income tax assessment. However, since the Company has incurred net operating losses in every tax year since inception, all its income tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state authorities for purposes of determining the amount of net operating loss carryforward that can be used to reduce taxable income.
 
 
F-11F-9

The net changes in the valuation allowance for three months ended March 31, 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2009 were an increase of approximately $2,136,000 and a decrease of $1,700,000, respectively, both resulting primarily from net operating losses generated. As a result of the Company’s continuing tax losses, it has recorded a full valuation allowance against a net deferred tax asset.

The Company has no tax provision for the three and six month periods ended March 31, 2010June 30, 2012 and 20092011 due to losses and full valuation allowances against net deferred tax assets.

Note 6.5. Shareholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock

The Company has 5,000,000250,000 shares of preferred stock authorized, none of which are issued or outstanding.

Common Stock

On June 21, 2012, the Company’s shareholders approved the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 20,000,000 to 50,000,000.

The following items represent transactions in the Company’s common stock for the three months ended March 31, 2010:June 30, 2012:

In five separate transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 294,091 shares of common stock under its existing Fusion Capital equity facility. The Company received an aggregate of $70,000 in proceeds which approximated the shares’ fair market value on the date of issuance.
In June 2012, the Company issued 10,345 shares of common stock as part of consideration for services performed. The fair value of such shares was $3,000 and was recognized as an expense in the quarter ended June 30, 2012.

In January 2010, the Company issued 403,225 shares of common stock pursuant to the $400,000 ($300,000 of which was issued in 2009) common stock equity investment agreement with its clinical trials management partner, Numoda Corporation (“Numoda”). These shares were priced at the then current 5-day average market price of $0.25 per share. The Company recognized $104,838 of research and development expense during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as a result of this transaction.

As a result of stock option and warrant exercises, 475,000 and 60,000 shares, respectively, were issued during the period.

Warrants

During 2010, the Company issued 15,000 warrants to purchase common stock shares to consultants in exchange for their services. Expense charges of $1,916 were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as a result of this issuance.

Note 7.6. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company has commitments of approximately $2.6 million$365,000 at March 31, 2010 in connection with a collaboration agreement with Numoda for the execution of our upcoming confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec® that began in September 2009 and is expectedJune 30, 2012 to complete in the first half of 2011.

The Company has several licensing agreements with consultants and universities, which upon clinical or commercialization success may require the payment of milestones and/or royalties if and when achieved. However, there can be no assurance that clinical or commercialization success will occur.

On February 7, 2012, the Company entered into a lease agreement through March 31, 2015 for existing office space. The rent for the first 12 months is approximately $8,000 per month, or approximately $18.25 per square foot. This rent increases to approximately $8,310 per month, or approximately $19.00 per square foot, for the remaining 24 months. Rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis.

In February 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of the following number of shares to each of Dr. Schaber Mr. Myrianthopoulos,and Dr. Brey and certain other employees and a consultant, uponimmediately prior to the completion of a transaction, or series or a combination of related transactions negotiated by the Company’sit’s Board of Directors whereby, directly or indirectly, a majority of the Company’sits capital stock or a majority of its assets are transferred from the Company and/or its stockholders to a third party: 1,000,00050,000 common shares to Dr. Schaber; 750,000 common shares to Mr. Myrianthopoulos; 200,000and 10,000 common shares to Dr. Brey; and 450,000 commonBrey. The amended agreement with Dr. Schaber includes its obligation to issue such shares to employees and a consultant shall be issued.  if such event occurs.

Employees with employment contracts have severance agreements that will provide separation benefits from the Company if they are involuntarily separated from employment. On February 15, 2012, Mr. Myrianthopoulos’ employment agreement was terminated. The Company recognized an expense of $95,625 at March 31, 2012 and at June 30, 2012 there is $37,795 of severance and healthcare benefits due to Mr. Myrianthopoulos.
As a result of the above agreements, the Company has future contractual obligations over the next five years as follows:

 
Year
 
Research and
Development
  
Property and
Other Leases
  Severance  Total 
2012 $65,000  $50,802  $37,795  $153,597 
2013  75,000   104,559   -   179,559 
2014  75,000   101,198   -   176,198 
2015  75,000   24,938   -   99,938 
2016  75,000   -   -   75,000 
Total $365,000  $281,497  $37,795  $684,292 
 
F-12F-10

 
Note 7. Subsequent Event

On July 17, 2012, the Company announced receiving a Small Business Innovation Research (“SBIR”) grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”) to further support preclinical development of OrbeShield™ as a treatment for GI ARS. This will provide the Company with approximately $600,000 over a two-year period to conduct the study.

Note 8. Business Segments

The Company maintains two active business segments: BioTherapeutics and Vaccines/BioDefense. Each segment includes an element of overhead costs specifically associated with its operations, with its corporate shared services group responsible for support functions generic to both operating segments.
  
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
  2010  2009 
Revenues, Principally from Grants      
BioDefense $263,790  $514,317 
BioTherapeutics  72,006   16,000 
  Total $335,796  $530,317 
         
Loss from Operations        
BioDefense (1)
 $(591,425) $(65,938)
BioTherapeutics  (1,141,757)  (1,537,772)
Corporate  (403,446)  (552,258)
  Total $(2,136,628) $(2,155,968)
 
Amortization and Depreciation Expense
        
BioDefense $23,109  $22,040 
BioTherapeutics  22,621   16,838 
Corporate  522   1,056 
  Total $46,252  $39,934 
         
Interest Income, Net         
Corporate  $368  $11,190 
         
Stock-Based Compensation        
BioDefense $12,940  $26,531 
BioTherapeutics   27,264   46,859 
Corporate   22,059   72,450 
   Total  $62,263  $145,840 
         

(1)  During the three months ended March 31 2010, the Company incurred $378,501 in a one-time patent write off cost related to its anticipated return of the botulinum toxin vaccine license and abandonment of related patents. This cost is reflected in research and development expense in the consolidated statement of operations.
  
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
  2012  2011 
Revenues, Principally from Grants      
Vaccines/BioDefense $710,237  $335,029 
BioTherapeutics  52,614   70,791 
  Total $762,851  $405,820 
         
Loss from Operations        
Vaccines/BioDefense $(2,144) $(67,425)
BioTherapeutics  (481,817)  (1,663,402)
Corporate  (497,716)  (201,963)
  Total $(981,677) $(1,932,790)
 
Amortization and Depreciation Expense
        
Vaccines/BioDefense $24,954  $10,183 
BioTherapeutics  25,892   43,290 
Corporate  562   542 
  Total $51,408  $54,015 
         
Interest Income, Net         
Corporate  $1,799  $1,473 
         
Stock-Based Compensation        
Vaccines/BioDefense $2,130  $18,416 
BioTherapeutics   56,194   188,255 
Corporate   59,064   25,198 
   Total  $117,388  $231,869 
 
 
F-13F-11

 
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
  2012  2011 
Revenues, Principally from Grants      
Vaccines/BioDefense $1,307,842  $871,615 
BioTherapeutics  102,427   342,210 
  Total $1,410,269  $1,213,825 
         
Income (Loss) from Operations        
Vaccines/BioDefense $(130,509) $52 
BioTherapeutics  (1,207,859)  (3,044,729
Corporate  (1,084,299)  (610,959
  Total $(2,422,667) $(3,655,636)
 
Amortization and Depreciation Expense
        
Vaccines/BioDefense $52,951  $19,872 
BioTherapeutics  54,733   84,491 
Corporate  1,069   1,080 
  Total $108,753  $105,443 
         
Interest Income, Net         
Corporate  $4,034  $3,908 
         
Stock-Based Compensation        
Vaccines/BioDefense $4,260  $36,832 
BioTherapeutics   112,614   286,508 
Corporate  118,128   65,296 
   Total $235,002  $388,636 
  
As of
March 31,
 2010
  
As of
December 31,
2009
 
       
Identifiable Assets      
BioDefense $439,362  $787,225 
BioTherapeutics  802,281   784,282 
Corporate  6,063,895   7,812,775 
  Total $7,305,538  $9,384,282 

  
As of
June 30,
 2012
  
As of
December 31,
2011
 
       
Identifiable Assets      
Vaccines/BioDefense $557,211  $689,266 
BioTherapeutics  658,593   753,767 
Corporate  4,695,661   6,780,625 
  Total $5,911,465  $8,223,658 
 
F-14F-12


Soligenix, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
As of December 31,
  2009  2008 
Assets
Current assets:
      
        Cash and cash equivalents $7,692,011  $1,475,466 
        Grants receivable  23,632   278,316 
        Inventory, net  42,865   82,182 
        Prepaid expenses  141,313    86,837 
Total current assets  7,899,821   1,922,801 
         
Office furniture and equipment, net  21,172   21,217 
Intangible assets, net  1,463,289   1,418,717 
Total assets $9,384,282  $3,362,735 
         
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity        
Current liabilities:        
        Accounts payable $844,857  $1,015,005 
        Accrued compensation  365,199   370,614 
 Total current liabilities  1,210,056   1,385,619 
Commitments and contingencies        
Shareholders’ equity:        
Preferred stock; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding  -   - 
 
Common stock, $.001 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized; 185,655,720 shares and 118,610,704 shares
 issued and outstanding in 2009 and 2008, respectively
  185,656   118,610 
       Additional paid-in capital  116,340,770   104,176,253 
       Accumulated deficit  (108,352,200)  (102,317,747)
Total shareholders’ equity  8,174,226   1,977,116 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $9,384,282  $3,362,735 
 
  2011  2010 
Assets      
Current assets:      
        Cash and cash equivalents $5,996,668  $7,451,714 
        Grants receivable  362,473   120,787 
        Taxes receivable  574,157   251,864 
        Prepaid expenses  195,762   187,494 
Total current assets  7,129,060   8,011,859 
Office furniture and equipment, net  15,032   20,699 
Intangible assets, net  1,079,566   1,235,989 
Total assets $8,223,658  $9,268,547 
         
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity        
Current liabilities:        
        Accounts payable $1,303,555  $1,674,175 
        Accrued compensation  129,061   236,581 
Total current liabilities  1,432,616   1,910,756 
Commitments and contingencies        
Shareholders’ equity:        
Preferred stock; 250,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding  -   - 
Common stock, $.001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 11,105,532 shares and 10,813,087 shares issued and outstanding in 2012 and 2011, respectively (1)  11,106   10,813 
       Additional paid-in capital (1)  124,897,309   123,085,757 
       Accumulated deficit  (118,117,373)  (115,738,779)
Total shareholders’ equity  6,791,042   7,357,791 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $8,223,658  $9,268,547 
(1)  Adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split of 1-for-20 effective February 1, 2012.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
F-15F-13


Soligenix, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the Years Ended December 31,

  2009  2008 
Revenues, principally from grants $2,816,037  $2,310,265 
Cost of revenues  (1,483,641)  (1,886,431)
        Gross profit  1,332,396   423,834 
         
Operating expenses:        
       Research and development  4,523,375   1,552,323 
       General and administrative  2,281,251   1,941,719 
       Stock-based compensation - research and development  210,834   182,168 
       Stock-based compensation - general and administrative  368,232   203,448 
Total operating expenses  7,383,692   3,879,658 
         
Loss from operations  (6,051,296)  (3,455,824)
         
Other income (expense):        
        Interest income  21,920   37,073 
        Interest expense  (2,678)  (3,276)
        Other expense  (2,399)  - 
Total other income (expense)  16,843   33,797 
Net loss $(6,034,453) $(3,422,027)
Basic and diluted net loss per share $(0.04) $(0.03)
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding  167,515,043   101,881,991 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-16

  2011  2010 
Revenues:      
   License revenue $5,000,000  $- 
   Grant revenue  2,662,822   1,947,628 
         
Total revenues  7,662,822   1,947,628 
Cost of  grant revenues  (2,108,228)  (1,638,402)
        Gross profit  5,554,594   309,226 
         
Operating expenses:        
       Research and development  6,272,616   5,986,405 
       General and administrative  2,242,173   2,201,242 
Total operating expenses  8,514,789   8,187,647 
         
Loss from operations  (2,960,195)  (7,878,421)
         
Other income (expense):        
        Interest income  7,444   12,074 
        Interest expense  -   (742)
        Other income, principally proceeds from QTDP grant  -   234,700 
Total other income  7 ,444   246,032 
Net loss before income taxes  (2,952,751)  (7,632,389)
Income tax benefit  574,157   245,810 
Net loss $(2,378,594) $(7,386,579)
Basic and diluted net loss per share (1) $(0.22) $(0.73)
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding (1)  10,957,676   10,120,324 
 
Soligenix, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008

  Common Stock  Additional  Accumulated    
  Shares  Par Value  Paid–In Capital  Deficit  Total 
Balance, January 1, 2008  94,996,547  $94,996  $101,391,090  $(98,895,720) $(2,590,366)
Issuance of common stock from private placement  3,658,890   3,659   654,940   -   658,599 
Issuance of common stock for commitment shares - Fusion  1,369,125   1,369   (1,369)  -   - 
Issuance of common stock for execution of letter of intent  16,666,667   16,667   1,483,333   -   1,500,000 
Issuance of common stock pursuant to equity line agreement - Fusion  993,084   993   126,507   -   127,500 
Issuance of common stock to vendors  758,082   758   110,440   -   111,198 
Issuance of common stock as payment to employees  168,309   168   25,696   -   25,864 
Stock-based compensation expense  -   -   385,616   -   385,616 
Net loss  -   -   -   (3,422,027)  (3,422,027)
Balance, December 31, 2008  118,610,704  $118,610  $104,176,253  $(102,317,747) $1,977,116 
Issuance of common stock from private placements, net of expenses of $347,000  38,266,602   38,267   6,488,995   -   6,527,262 
Issuance of common stock for collaboration and supply agreement with Sigma Tau  25,000,000   25,000   4,375,000   -   4,400,000 
Issuance of common stock pursuant to equity line agreement - Fusion  708,989   709   114,292   -   115,001 
Issuance of common stock to vendors  2,500,000   2,500   297,500   -   300,000 
Issuance of common stock warrants to vendors  -   -   190,655   -   190,655 
Issuance of common stock to former employee  569,425   570   119,009   -   119,579 
Stock-based compensation expense  -   -   579,066   -   579,066 
Net loss  -   -   -   (6,034,453)  (6,034,453)
Balance, December 31, 2009  185,655,720  $185,656  $116,340,770  $(108,352,200) $8,174,226 
(1)  Adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split of 1-for-20 effective February 1, 2012.
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
 
 
F-17F-14


Soligenix, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsChanges in Shareholders’ Equity
For the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

  2009  2008 
Operating activities:      
Net loss $(6,034,453) $(3,422,027)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used
in operating activities:
        
            Amortization and depreciation  175,604   149,183 
Inventory reserve
  50,000   100,000 
Stock or warrants issued in exchange for services
  490,654   137,062 
Stock-based compensation
  579,066   385,616 
Stock issued to former employee
  119,579   - 
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
  2,399   - 
Change in operating assets and liabilities:        
Grants receivable
  254,684   (180,471)
Inventory
  (10,683)  (182,182)
Prepaid expenses
  (54,476)  32,341 
Accounts payable
  (170,148)  167,396 
Accrued compensation
  (5,415)  24,710 
Total adjustments
  1,431,264   633,655 
Net cash used in operating activities
  (4,603,189)  (2,788,372)
         
Investing activities:        
         
Acquisition of intangible assets  (206,799)  (237,113)
Purchase of office equipment  (15,730)  (5,277)
Net cash used in investing activities
  (222,529)  (242,390)
         
Financing activities:        
Net proceeds from sale of common stock  10,927,262   2,158,600 
Proceeds from sale of common stock pursuant to equity line  115,001   127,500 
Net cash provided by financing activities
  11,042,263   2,286,100 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  6,216,545   (744,662)
            Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  1,475,466   2,220,128 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
 $7,692,011  $1,475,466 
         
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow:        
Cash paid for interest $2,678  $3,276 
Non-cash transactions:        
Issuance of commitment shares
 $-  $272,484 
  Common Stock  Additional       
  Shares (1)  Par Value (1)  
Paid–In
Capital (1)
  
Accumulated
Deficit
  Total 
Balance, December 31, 2009  9,284,109   9,284   116,517,142   (108,352,200)  8,174,226 
Issuance of common stock pursuant to private placements, net of $224,421 in expenses  1,440,068   1,440   5,678,416   -   5,679,856 
Fair value of common stock warrants to vendors  -   -   67,052   -   67,052 
Issuance of common stock pursuant to Fusion equity line  14,705   15   69,985   -   70,000 
Issuance of common stock to vendors  20,161   20   104,818   -   104,838 
Issuance of common stock for option and warrant exercises  54,044   54   76,799   -   76,853 
Stock-based compensation expense  -   -   571,545   -   571,545 
Net loss  -   -   -   (7,386,579)  (7,386,579)
Balance, December 31, 2010  10,813,087  $10,813  $123,085,757  $(115,738,779) $7,357,791 
                     
Issuance of common stock from collaboration agreement  66,890   67   399,933   -   400,000 
Issuance of common stock pursuant to Fusion equity line  90,789   91   354,909   -   355,000 
Issuance of common stock to vendors  29,297   29   14,971   -   15,000 
Issuance of common stock to employee as severance  25,625   26   20,474   -   20,500 
Issuance of common stock for option and warrant exercises  79,844   80   253,533   -   253,613 
Fair value of common stock warrants to vendors  -   -   11,184   -   11,184 
Settlement of broker fees associated with 2010 financing  -   -   40,743   -   40,743 
Stock-based compensation expense  -   -   715,805   -   715,805 
Net loss  -   -   -   (2,378,594)  (2,378,594)
Balance, December 31, 2011  11,105,532  $11,106  $124,897,309  $(118,117,373) $6,791,042 

(1)  Adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split of 1-for-20 effective February 1, 2012.
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-15

Soligenix, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31,
  2011  2010 
Operating activities:      
Net loss $(2,378,594) $(7,386,579)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
    Amortization and depreciation  226,027   185,696 
    Common stock issued for amended license agreement  400,000   - 
    Common stock issued to former employee  20,500   - 
    Common stock or warrants issued in exchange for services  26,184   171,890 
    Stock-based compensation  715,805   571,545 
    Capitalized patent write-off  88,727   378,501 
Change in operating assets and liabilities:        
    Grants receivable  (241,686  (97,155)
    Taxes receivable  (322,293  (251,864)
    Inventory  -   42,865 
    Prepaid expenses  (8,268)  (46,181)
    Accounts payable  (370,620  829,318 
    Accrued compensation  (107,520)  (128,618
    Total adjustments  426,856   1,655,997 
    Net cash used in operating activities  (1,951,738)  (5,730,582)
         
Investing activities:        
 Acquisition of intangible assets  (151,086)  (330,163)
 Purchase of office equipment  (1,578)  (6,261)
    Net cash used in investing activities  (152,664)  (336,424)
         
Financing activities:        
Net proceeds from sale of common stock  -   5,679,856 
Settlement of Broker Fees associated with 2010 Financing  40,743   - 
Proceeds from sale of common stock pursuant to equity line  355,000   70,000 
Proceeds from exercise of options and warrants  253,613   76,853 
    Net cash provided by financing activities  649,356   5,826,709 
         
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (1,455,046)  (240,297)
    Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  7,451,714   7,692,011 
    Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $5,996,668  $7,451,714 
         
Supplemental information:        
         
Cash paid for state income taxes $2,750  $2,853 
Shares retired $ -  $ 43 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
 
 
F-18F-16


Soligenix, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Nature of Business

Basis of Presentation

Soligenix, Inc. (the “Company”), formerly known as DOR BioPharma, Inc., iswas incorporated in Delaware in 1987.  We are a late-stagedevelopment stage biopharmaceutical company that was incorporated in 1987 and is focused on developing products to treat the life-threatening side effects of cancer treatments and serious gastrointestinal diseases where there remains an unmet medical need, as well as developing several biodefense vaccines and therapeutics. The Company maintainsWe maintain two active business segments: BioTherapeutics and Vaccines/BioDefense. Soligenix’s

Our BioTherapeutics business segment intends to develop orBec® (oraloral beclomethasone dipropionate or oral(oral BDP) for indications such as pediatric Crohn’s disease and other biotherapeutic products, including LPMTM-Leuprolide. SoligenixR 17;s acute radiation enteritis. Our Vaccines/BioDefense business segment intends to convert itsincludes active development programs for RiVax™, our ricin and botulinum toxin vaccine, programs and VeloThrax™, our anthrax vaccine, and OrbeShield™, our gastrointestinal acute radiation injury program from early stage development tosyndrome (“GI ARS”) therapeutic. The advanced development of our vaccine programs is currently supported by our heat stabilization technology, known as ThermoVax™, under existing and manufacturing.on-going government grant funding.

The Company generates revenues primarily from the National Institutes of Health (the “NIH”) under threefour active BioDefense grants and could generate license fees from Sigma-Tau by achieving certain milestones.

The Company is subject to risks common to companies in the successful achievementbiotechnology industry including, but not limited to, development of development milestonesnew technological innovations, dependence on key personnel, protections of proprietary technology, compliance with FDA regulations, litigation, and product liability.

The Company generates revenues primarily from the National Institutes of Health (the “NIH”) under collaborative agreements,four active grants and its Named Patient Access Program (“NPAP”) partners for orBec®.could generate license fees from Sigma-Tau by achieving certain milestones.

The Company is subject to risks common to companies in the biotechnology industry including, but not limited to, development of new technological innovations, dependence on key personnel, protections of proprietary technology, compliance with FDA regulations, litigation, and product liability.

Liquidity

As of December 31, 2009,2011, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $7,692,011$5,996,668 as compared to $1,475,466$7,451,714 as of December 31, 2008,2010, representing an increasea decrease of $6,216,545.$1,455,046 or 20%. As of December 31, 2009,2011, the Company had working capital of $6,689,765$5,696,444 as compared to working capital of $537,182$6,101,103 as of December 31, 2008,2010, representing an increasea decrease of $6,152,583.$404,659 or 7%.  The increasedecrease in working capital was the result of the execution of our collaboration agreement and ensuing sale of our common stock to our commercialization partner Sigma-Tau of $4.5 million, plus the $6.5 million in proceeds from the sale of our common stock and warrants to accredited investors, less the cash used in operating and investing activities over the period.

period, offset by the proceeds of $5,000,000 received from the Sigma-Tau Agreement in July 2011, as well as option exercise proceeds and proceeds from the sale of stock under the Fusion equity line.  For the year ended December 31, 2009,2011, the Company’s cash used in operating activities was $4,603,189,$1,951,738, as compared to $2,788,372$5,730,582 for the same period in 2008. The increase in spending2010, representing a decrease of $3,778,884. This decrease was attributable to the preparationCompany’s receipt of $5,000,000 relating to the execution of an expanded license agreement with Sigma-Tau for andthe European territory offset by expenditures to the conduct of the confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec®orBec® in the treatment of acute gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host disease (“GI GVHD.

F-19

Management’s business activities can be outlined as follows:

·  
complete the pivotal Phase 3 confirmatory clinical trial for orBec® in the treatment of acute gastrointestinal Graft-versus-Host disease (“GI GVHD”);
·  
identify a development and marketing partner for orBec® for territories outside of North America, as we have granted an exclusive license to Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Sigma-Tau”) to commercialize orBec® in the U.S., Canada and Mexico;
·  
conduct and complete a Phase 2 clinical trial of orBec® for the prevention of acute GVHD;
·  evaluate and initiate additional clinical trials to explore the effectiveness of oral BDP in other therapeutic indications involving inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal tract such as radiation enteritis, radiation injury and Crohn’s disease;
·  
reinitiate development of our other biotherapeutics products, including LPMTM Leuprolide;
·  continue to secure additional government funding for each of our BioDefense programs through grants, contracts and procurements;
·  convert our biodefense vaccine programs from early stage development to advanced development and manufacturing with the potential to collaborate and/or partner with other companies in the biodefense area;
·  
make orBec®  available worldwide through the Named Patient Access Program for the treatment of acute GI GVHD;
·  acquire or in-license new clinical-stage compounds for development; and
·  explore other business development and acquisition strategies.
GVHD”).  Based on the Company’s current rate of cash outflows, cash on hand the timely collection of milestone payments under collaboration agreements,and  proceeds from ourits grant programs, and potential minimal proceeds from the Fusion Capital transaction,State of New Jersey Technology Business Tax Certificate Transfer Program, management believes that its current cash will be sufficient to meet the anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures beyondinto the firstfourth quarter of 2011.2013.

An outline of management’s business strategy follows:
Initiate a Phase 1/2 clinical trial of oral BDP, known as SGX203, in pediatric Crohn’s disease;
Evaluate the effectiveness of orBec®/Oral BDP in other therapeutic indications involving inflammatory conditions of the gastrointestinal (“GI”) tract such as prevention of acute radiation enteritis and treatment of chronic GI GVHD;
Develop RiVaxTM and VeloThrax™ in combination with our proprietary vaccine heat stabilization technology, known as ThermoVax™, to develop new heat stable vaccines in biodefense and infectious diseases with the potential to collaborate and/or partner with other companies in these areas;
Continue to apply for and secure additional government funding for each of our BioTherapeutics and Vaccines/BioDefense programs through grants, contracts and/or procurements;
Acquire or in-license new clinical-stage compounds for development; and
Explore other business development and acquisition strategies.
F-17

The Company’s plans with respect to its liquidity management include, but are not limited to, the following:

·  We have $10The Company has instituted a cost reduction plan which has reduced headcount and will continue to reduce costs wherever possible.
The Company has approximately $3.8 million in active grant funding still available to support ourits associated research programs in 2010through 2013 and beyond.  Additionally, we haveThe Company plans to submitted additional grant applications for further support of theseits programs and others with various funding agencies, and received encouraging feedback to date on the likelihood of funding.agencies.
·  We haveThe Company has continued to use equity instruments to provide a portion of the compensation due to vendors and collaboration partners and expectexpects to continue to do so for the foreseeable future.
·  We have approximately $7.7 millionThe Company will pursue Net Operating Losses (“NOLs”) sales in available capacity under our Fusion Capital equity facility.  Although we have historically drawn amountsthe State of New Jersey pursuant to its Technology Business Tax Certificate Transfer Program. Based on the receipt of $574,157 in modest amounts under this agreement, we could draw more within certain contractual parameters.proceeds pursuant to NOLs sales in 2011, the Company expects to participate in the program during 2012 and beyond; and
·  WeThe Company may seek additional capital in the private and/or public equity markets to continue ourits operations, respond to competitive pressures, develop new products and services, and to support new strategic partnerships. We areThe Company is currently evaluating additional equity financing opportunities and may execute them when appropriate. However, there can be no assurances that wethe Company can consummate such a transaction, or consummate a transaction at favorable pricing.

Reverse Stock Split

F-20On February 1, 2012, the Company completed a reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock at a ratio of 1-for-20, whereby, once effective, every 20 shares of its common stock was exchanged for one share of its common stock.  Its common stock began trading on the OTCQB on a reverse split basis at the market opening on February 2, 2012.  All share and per share data have been restated to reflect this reverse stock split.


Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include Soligenix, Inc., and its wholly and majority owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated as a result of consolidation.

Operating Segments

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated on a regular basis by the chief operating decision maker, or decision making group, in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and in assessing the performance of the segment. The Company divides its operations into two operating segments: BioTherapeutics and Vaccines/BioDefense.

Grants Receivable

ReceivablesGrants receivable consist of unbilled amounts due from various grants from the National Institute of Health of the U.S. Federal GovernmentNIH for costs incurred prior to the period end under reimbursement contracts. The amounts were billed to the NIH in the month subsequent to period end and collected shortly thereafter. The Company considers the grants receivable to be fully collectible; accordingly,collectible. Accordingly, no allowance for doubtful amounts has been established. If amounts become uncollectible, they are charged to operations.
F-18


Intangible Assets

One of the most significant estimates or judgments that the Company makes is whether to capitalize or expense patent and license costs. The Company makes this judgment based on whether the technology has alternative future uses, as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)(“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)(“ASC”) 730, Research and Development. Based on this consideration, the Company capitalizes payments made to legal firms that are engaged in filing and protecting rights to intellectual property and rights for ourits current products in both the domestic and international markets. The Company believes that patent rights are one of its most valuable assets. Patents and patent applications are a key component of intellectual property, especially in the early stage of prod uctproduct development, as their purchase and maintenance gives the Company access to key product development rights from Soligenix’s academic and industrial partners. These rights can also be sold or sub-licensed as part of its strategy to partner its products at each stage of development as the intangible assets have alternative future use. The legal costs incurred for these patents consist of work  designed to protect, preserve, maintainassociated with filing new patents and perhaps extendextending the lives of the patents. The Company capitalizes such costs and amortizes intangibles over their expected useful life – generally a period of 11 to 16 years.

The Company capitalized $206,799$151,086 and $237,113$330,163 in patent related costs during the years ended December 31, 20092011 and 2008,2010, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company incurred an $88,727 patent write off cost due to abandonment of patents related to azathioprine. During December 31, 2010, the Company incurred $378,501 in a patent write off cost related to its return of the botulinum toxin vaccine license and abandonment of related patents. These costs are reflected in research and development expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Office furniture and equipment and intangible assets are evaluated and reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company recognizes impairment of long-lived assets in the event the net book value of such assets exceeds the estimated future undiscounted cash flows attributable to such assets. If the sum of the expected undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of the related asset or group of assets, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the related asset or group of assets. Such analyses necessarily involve significant judgment.

The Company did not record any impairment of intangiblelong-lived assets for the years ended December 31, 20092011 or 2008.

F-21

Inventory

Inventories are stated at2010, except for the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method and includes the cost of materials and overhead. Inventory consists of finished goods related to the orBec® NPAP. The Company records an allowance as needed for excess inventory.  During 2008 and 2009 allowances of $100,000 and $150,000, respectively, were provided. This allowance will be evaluated on a periodic basis and adjustments will be made as required.patent write-offs discussed in Note 3.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. require that fair values be disclosed for the Company’s financial instruments. The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, which include grants receivable and current liabilities, are considered to be representative of their respective fair values.

Revenue Recognition

ThePrincipally the Company’s revenues are generated from NIH grants and revenues from licensing activities and the achievement of licensing milestones and NPAP sales(in prior periods). Recording of orBecrevenue is applied in accordance with FASB ASC 605, ®Revenue Recognition, ASC 605-25 and/or Accounting Standard Update, ASU, 2009-13, Revenue Recognition – Multiple Element Arrangements. The revenue from NIH grants areis based upon subcontractor costs and internal costs incurred that are specifically covered by the grants, plus a facilities and administrative rate that provides funding for overhead expenses. These revenues are recognized when expenses have been incurred by subcontractors or when the Company incurs internal expenses that are related to the grant.
Licensing and associated milestone revenues are recorded when earned.  Revenue from NPAP salesOn September 15, 2011, as a result of orBec® arestopping the confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial as well as no future clinical development or performance obligations associated with the Sigma-Tau Agreement, the Company recognized whenlicense revenue of $5,000,000 relating to the product is shipped.execution of an expanded license agreement with Sigma-Tau for the European territory.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred.incurred in accordance with FASB ASC 730, Research and Development. Research and development includes costs such as clinical trial expenses, contracted research and license agreement fees with no alternative future use, supplies and materials, salaries andstock based compensation, employee benefits, equipment depreciation and allocation of various corporate costs. Purchased in-process research and development expense represents the value assigned or paid for acquired research and development for which there is no alternative future use as of the date of acquisition.
F-19


Stock-Based Compensation

From time to time, the Company issues restricted shares of common stock to vendors and consultants as compensation for services performed. Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the fair value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period.  Typically these instruments vest upon issuance and therefore the entire stock compensation expense is recognized upon issuance to the vendors and/or consultants.

Stock options are issued with an exercise price equal to the market price on the date of issuance. Stock options issued to directors upon re-election vest quarterly for a period of one year (new director issuances are fully vested upon issuance.issuance). Stock options issued to employees generally vest 25% upfront,immediately as of the grant date, then 25% each subsequent year for a period of three years. Stock options vest over each three month period from the date of issuance to the end of the three year period. These options have a ten year life for as long as the individuals remain employees or directors. In general when an employee or director terminates their position the options will expire within sixthree months, unless otherwise extended by the Board.

The fair value of options in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Stock Compensation, was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following weighted-average assumptions:

·  no dividend yield;
·  an expected life of 4 years;
·  volatilities ranging from 126% to 130% for 2009 and 115% for 2008; and
·  average risk-free interest rates of 1.8% and 1.1% in 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The Company estimates these values based on the assumptions that have been historically available. The fair value of each option grant made during 2009 and 2008 was estimated on the date of each grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and amortized ratably over the option’s vesting periods, which approximates the service period. The Company awarded 3,712,500 and 6,800,000 stock options in 2009 and 2008, respectively.

F-22

Stock compensation expense for options, warrants and shares of common stock granted to non-employees has been determined in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Stock Compensation, and FASB ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, and represents the fair value of the consideration received, or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever may be more reliably measured. For options that vest over future periods, the fair value of options granted to non-employeesnon-employee directors is amortized as the options vest. The option’s price is re-measured using the Black-Scholes model at the end of each three month reporting period.

Upon exercise, shares are issued from the amended 2005 equity incentive plan and increase the number of shares the Company has outstanding. There were no stock option exercises during 2009 or 2008. There were forfeitures or expirations of 620,000 and 100,000 stock options during 2009 and 2008, respectively. The intrinsicfair value of options in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Stock Compensation, was estimated using the stock options outstanding at December 31, 2009 was zero.Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following weighted-average assumptions:

a dividend yield of 0%;
an expected life of 4 years;
·  volatilities ranging from 123% to 160% and 127% to 129% for 2011 and 2010, respectively;
forfeitures at a rate of 12%; and
risk-free interest rates of 0.69% and 1.47% to 0.77% to 1.91% in 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The intrinsic value was calculated as the difference between the Company’s common stock closing price on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board at December 31, 2009 and the exercise price of the stock option issued multiplied by the number of shares underlying the stock options. The Company’s common stock price at December 31, 2009 was $0.25.

From time to time, the Company issues common stock to vendors, consultants, and employees as compensation for services performed. These shares are typically issued as restricted stock, unless issued to non-affiliates under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, where the stock may be issued as unrestricted. The restricted stock can only have the restrictive legend removed if the shares underlying the certificate are sold pursuant to an effective registration statement, which the Company must file and have approved by the SEC, if the shares underlying the certificate are sold pursuant to Rule 144, provided certain conditions are satisfied, or if the shares are sold pursuant to another exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.  Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period isestimates these values based on the assumptions that have been historically available. The fair value of the common stock ateach option grant made during 2011 and 2010 was estimated on the date of each grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and amortized ratably over the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest duringoption’s vesting periods, which approximates the service period.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. A valuation allowance is established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. A review of all available positive and negative evidence is considered, including the Company’s current and past performance, the market environment in which the Company operates, the utilization of past tax credits, and the length of carryback and carryforward periods. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured utilizing tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. No current or deferred income taxes have been provided through December 31, 20092011 due to the net operating losses incurred by the Company since its inception. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions, if any, as part of income tax expense. There were no tax related interest and penalties recorded for 2011 and 2010. Additionally, the Company has not recorded a liabilityan asset for unrecognized tax benefits or a liability for uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2011 and 2010. The income tax returns for 2008, 2009 and 2008.2010 are subject to examination by the IRS and other various taxing authorities, generally for three years after they were filed.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.period, as adjusted for the reverse stock split of 1-for-20 effective February 1, 2012. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that shared in the earnings of the entity. Since there is a largesignificant number of options and warrants outstanding, fluctuations in the actual market price can have a variety of results for each period presented. No options and warrants were included in the 2011 and 2010 computations of diluted earnings per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive as a result of losses or options and warrants for which the strike price exceeds the quoted market value at period end.
 
  For the Year Ended  For the Year Ended 
  December 31, 2009  December 31, 2008 
  Net Loss  Shares  EPS  Net Loss  Shares  EPS 
Basic & Diluted EPS $(6,034,453)  167,515,043  $(0.04) $(3,422,027)  101,881,991  $(0.03)
F-20


  For the Year Ended  For the Year Ended 
  December 31, 2011  December 31, 2010 
  Net Loss  Shares  EPS  Net Loss  Shares  EPS 
Basic & Diluted EPS  (2,378,594)  10,957,676  $(0.22) $(7,386,579)  10,120,324  $(0.73)

OptionsShare issuable upon the exercise of options and warrants outstanding at December 31, 20092011 and 20082010 were   19,311,5391,544,242 and 16,370,0391,308,052 shares issuable upon the exercise of options, and 42,472,8742,701,569 and  20,350,1482,703,819 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants, respectively. The weighted average exercise price of the Company’s stock options and warrants outstanding at December 31, 2011 were $3.75 and $4.04 per share, respectively. No options and warrants were included in the 20092011 and 20082010 computations of diluted earnings per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive as a result of losses in each of those years.
F-23


Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions such as the fair value of warrants, stock options and recovery of the useful life of intangibles that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009,April 2010, the FASB issued ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting PrinciplesStandards Update (“ASU”) 2010-12, Accounting for Certain Tax Effects of the 2010 Health Care Reform Acts, which establishesclarifies the FASB Accounting Standards Codification aseffect, if any, that the sole sourcedifferent signing dates of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles. The Codification supersedes existing GAAPthe Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (signed March 23, 2010) and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (signed March 30, 2010). ASU 2010-12 became effective for nongovernmental entities. Pursuant to the provisions of FASB ASC 105, the Company has updated references to GAAP in its financial statements issued forupon issuance. The adoption of the period ended September 30, 2009 and thereafter. The implementation of these standardsstandard did not have any effectimpact on the Company’sCompany's consolidated financial statements.

In October 2009,April 2010, the FASB issued ASC 605-25,Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-17, Revenue Recognition—Milestone Method (Topic 605) - Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition – Multiple Element Arrangements- a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force, which defines aprovides guidance to vendors on the criteria that should be met for determining whether the milestone and clarifies whether amethod of revenue recognition is appropriate. A vendor maycan recognize arrangement consideration earned from thethat is contingent upon achievement of a milestone in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved.  Aachieved only if the milestone meets all of the following criteria to be considered substantive. Determining whether a milestone is defined as an event for which theresubstantive is “substantial” uncertaintya matter of judgment made at the dateinception of the arrangement is entered into thatarrangement. To be considered substantive, the event willfollowing criteria must be achieved.met. The consideration earned fromby achieving the achievementmilestone should:
Be commensurate with either of the following:
mThe vendor’s performance to achieve the milestone
mThe enhancement of the value of the item delivered as a result of a specific outcome resulting from the vendor’s performance to achieve the milestone
Relate solely to past performance
Be reasonable relative to all deliverables and payment terms in the arrangement
A milestone should be considered substantive in its entirety. An arrangement may include more than one milestone, and each milestone should be evaluated separately to determine whether the milestone is commensurate with either thesubstantive. A vendor’s performancedecision to achieve the milestone or the enhancement of the value of the delivered item and relates solely to past performance and is reasonable relative to the deliverables and payment terms wi thin the arrangement. The guidance in this accounting policy does not require use of the milestone method of revenue recognition for transactions within the scope of ASU 2010-17is a policy election, and instead provides guidancecertain disclosures are required for each arrangement that includes milestone consideration accounted for in accordance with ASU 2010-17. Other proportional revenue recognition methods also may be applied as long as the application of those other methods does not result in the recognition of consideration in its entirety in the period the milestone is achieved.
The amendments in ASU 2010-17 were effective on one method of accounting that could be used to accounta prospective basis for the arrangements that fall within its scope.  The effective date of this consensus is formilestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after DecemberJune 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted. The2010 and had no impact to the Company is evaluating if the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its financial statements.

In December 2009, the FASB updated ASC 810, Consolidations, which changes how a reporting entity determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another entity is based on, among other things, the other entity’s purpose and design and the reporting entity’s ability to direct the activities of the other entity that most significantly impact the other entity’s economic performance.  SFAS No. 167 will require a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures about its involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A repor ting entity will be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects the reporting entity’s financial statements. SFAS No. 167 will be effective at the start of a reporting entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009, or January 1, 2010, for a calendar year-end entity. Early application is not permitted. The Company is evaluating if the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its financial statements.upon adoption.
 
 
Note 3. Office Furniture and Equipment

Office furniture and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over five years. Office and laboratory equipment consisted of the following as of December 31:
  2009  2008 
Office equipment $31,567  $124,849 
Office furniture  2,889   5,756 
Laboratory equipment  -   23,212 
   34,456   153,817 
Less: Accumulated depreciation  ( 13,284)  ( 132,600)
Office furniture and equipment, net
 $21,172  $21,217 

During 2009 laboratory equipment and office equipment of with an original cost and accumulated depreciation of $135,092 and $132,693, respectively, was written off, resulting in a loss on disposal of $2,399 for 2009.  Depreciation expense was $13,377 and $10,001 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Note 4.3. Intangible Assets

The following is a summary of intangible assets which consists of licenses and patents:

 
Weighted Average Amortization period (years)
  
 
Cost
  
Accumulated
Amortization
  
 
Net Book Value
  
Weighted
Average
Amortization
period
(years)
 
 
 
Cost
 
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
 
 
Net Book Value
 
December 31, 2009            
December 31, 2011December 31, 2011       
Licenses
  10.7  $462,234  $170,231  $292,003  8.72  $462,234  $224,708  $237,526 
Patents
  6.2   2,077,401   906,115   1,171,286  3.3   1,893,185   1,051,145   842,040 
Total  7.0  $2,539,635  $1,076,346  $1,463,289  4.4  $2,355,419  $1,275,853  $1,079,566 
December 31, 2008                
December 31, 2010December 31, 2010       
Licenses
  11.7  $462,234  $142,994  $319,240  9.7  $462,234  $197,469  $264,765 
Patents
  9.0   1,870,603   771,126   1,099,477  4.2   1,912,784   941,560   971,224 
Total  9.5  $2,332,837  $914,120  $1,418,717  5.3  $2,375,018  $1,139,029  $1,235,989 

Amortization expense was $162,227$218,782 and $139,183$178,962 in 20092011 and 2008,2010, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company incurred an $88,727 patent write off cost due to abandonment of patents related to azathioprine. During December 31, 2010, the Company incurred $378,501 in a patent write off cost related to its return of the botulinum toxin vaccine license and abandonment of related patents. These costs are reflected in research and development expense in the consolidated statement of operations.
Based on the balance of licenses and patents at December 31, 2009,2011, the annual amortization expense for each of the succeeding five years is estimated to be as follows:

YearAmortization Expense Amortization Expense 
2010$   178,000
2011     178,000
2012     178,000 $223,200 
2013     178,000 $223,200 
2014     178,000 $223,200 
2015 $223,200 
2016 $223,200 

License fees and royalty payments are expensed annually as incurred as the Company does not attribute any future benefits other than within that period.
F-25

Note 5. Inventory

In the third quarter of 2008, the Company purchased and recorded inventory for the first time, because of the development of the NPAP programs which provided the Company the ability to sell orBec® for the first time.  Inventory consists of finished goods. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 the Company also recorded an allowance for excess inventory of $150,000 and $100,000, respectively.

Note 6.4. Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets consisted of the following as of December 31:

 2009  2008  2011  2010 
Net operating loss carry forwards $24,249,000  $26,300,000  $26,001,000  $26,294,000 
Orphan drug and research and development credit carry forwards  3,339,000   2,000,000   2,818,000   3,462,000 
Other  2,312,000   3,300,000   1,615,000   1,796,000 
Total  29,900,000   31,600,000   30,434,000   31,552,000 
Valuation allowance  (29,900,000)  (31,600,000)  (30,434,000)  (31,552,000)
Net deferred tax assets $-  $-  $-  $- 

At December 31, 2009,2011, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards (“NOLs”) of approximately $82,000,000$75,900,000 for federal and state tax purposes and approximately $2,350,000 of New Jersey net operating loss carry forwards remaining after the sale of unused net operating loss carry forwards, portions of which are currently expiring each year until 2029.2030. In addition, the Company had $3,600,000$2,818,000 of various tax credits that start expiring from December 20092012 to December 2029.2031. The Company may be able to utilize their NOLs to reduce future federal and state income tax liabilities.  However, these NOLs are subject to various limitations under Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) Section 382.  IRC Section 382 limits the use of NOLs to the extent there has been an ownership change of more than 50 percentage points. In addition, the NOL carryforwards are subject to examination by the taxing authority and could be adjusted or disallowed due to such exams.  Although the Company has not undergone an IRC Section 382 analysis, it is possiblelikely that the utilization of the NOLs may be substantially limited.

F-22

The Company and one or more of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction, and various state and local jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to Federal income tax assessment for years before 2004.2007 and 2006 for New Jersey income tax assessment. However, since the Company has incurred net operating losses in every tax year since inception, all its income tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state authorities for purposes of determining the amount of net operating loss carryforward that can be used to reduce taxable income.

The net change in the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 20092011 and December 31, 20082010 was a decrease of approximately $1,700,000$1,115,000 and increase of $1,600,000,$1,652,000, respectively, resulting primarily from net operating losses expiring and generated. As a result of the Company’s continuing tax losses, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against a net deferred tax asset.

Reconciliations of the difference between income tax benefit computed at the federal and state statutory tax rates and the provision for income tax benefit for the years ended December 31, 20092011 and 20082010 was as follows:
 2009  2008  2011 2010 
Income tax loss at federal statutory rate  (34.00)%  (34.00)%  (34.00)%  (34.00)%
State taxes, net of federal benefit  (6.50)  (6.50)
State tax benefits, plus sale of NJ NOLs, net of federal benefit  (6.00)  (6.50)
Subtotal  (40.50)  (40.50 )  (40.00)  (40.50)
Valuation allowance  40.50   40.50   20.56   37.28 
Provision for income taxes (benefit)  -%  -%  (19.44)%  (3.22)%
The Company adoptedfollows FASB ASC 740-10, Uncertainty in Income Taxes.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense. The Company does not expect that there will be any amounts of unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months. This standard prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The adoption did not have an effect on the consolidated financial statements.
 
F-26

In November 2010, the Company received $234,700 of cash proceeds, net of transaction costs, from grants in response to an application submitted for qualified investments in qualifying therapeutic discovery projects under Section 48D of the Internal Revenue Code, which is included in Other Income (Expense) for the year ended December 31, 2010.

During the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, in accordance with the State of New Jersey’s Technology Business Tax Certificate Program, which allowed certain high technology and biotechnology companies to sell unused net operating loss carryforwards to other New Jersey-based corporate taxpayers based in New Jersey, the Company sold New Jersey net operating loss carryforwards, resulting in the recognition of $574,157 and $245,810 of income tax benefit, net of transaction costs, respectively. There can be no assurance as to the continuation or magnitude of this program in future.
Note 7.5. Shareholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock

The Company has 5 million authorized250,000 shares of preferred stock authorized, none of which are issued or outstanding.

F-23

Common Stock

The following items represent transactions in the Company’s common stock for the year ended December 31, 2009:2011:

·  In 11sixteen separate transactions during 2009,2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 708,98990,789 shares of common stock under its existing Fusion Capital equity facility. The Company received an aggregate of $115,001$355,000 in proceeds which approximated the shares’ fair market value on the date of issuance.

·  As a result of stock option exercises, 79,844 shares were issued during 2011. The Company received an aggregate of $253,613 in proceeds from these exercises.
As a result of granting Sigma-Tau an exclusive license to commercialize orBec® in the European territory, the Company amended the license agreement with Dr. George McDonald and issued 66,890 shares of Company stock in lieu of $400,000 cash obligation. Stock price used for share calculation was $5.98, closing price at July 29, 2011.
In September 2009,December 2011, the Company received $4,390,200 from the completed private placementissued 25,625 shares of common stock and warrants to accredited investors. Underas part of an employee’s severance from the terms of the agreements,Company.
In December 2011, the Company sold 17,352,567 common shares together with five year warrants to purchase up to 8,676,284issued 29,297 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.278 per share,as part of consideration for an aggregate price of $4,390,200, or $0.253 per share, representing the market price as determined by the five-day average closing price of the Company’s common stock prior to the date of the agreements. The expiration date of the warrants can be accelerated at the option of the Company if the Company's common stock meets certain price thresholds. The Company would receive additional gross proceeds of approximately $2,412,000 if they are all exercised. The Company’s North American collaboration par tner, Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc., led this offering with an investment of $1 million.services performed.

The following items represent transactions in the Company’s common stock for the year ended December 31, 2010:
·  In August 2009, 569,425sixteen separate transactions during 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 90,789 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued tounder its existing Fusion Capital equity facility. The Company received an aggregate of $355,000 in proceeds which approximated the former controller, treasurer and secretary of the Company in partial settlement of certain compensation and severance liabilities pursuant to the employee’s employment agreement. The aggregate number of shares is subject to future adjustment for a six month period following the separation date should the market price fall below the original issuance price. The former employee was granted standard piggyback registration rights with respect to those shares. Compensation expense of $119,579 was recorded in General & Administrative Expense for 2009 related to this issuance, representing theshares’ fair market value of the shares aton the date of issuance.

·  As a result of stock option exercises, 79,844 shares were issued during 2011. The Company received an aggregate of $253,613 in proceeds from these exercises.
As a result of granting Sigma-Tau an exclusive license to commercialize orBec® in the European territory, the Company amended the license agreement with Dr. George McDonald and issued 66,890 shares of Company stock in lieu of $400,000 cash obligation. Stock price used for share calculation was $5.98, closing price at July 29, 2011.
In March 2009,December 2011, the Company issued 2,500,00025,625 shares of common stock pursuant toas part of an employee’s severance from the $400,000 ($300,000Company.
In December 2011, the Company issued 29,297 shares of which was issued on this date) common stock equity investment agreement with its clinical trials management partner, Numoda Corporation (“Numoda”). These shares were priced at the then current market priceas part of $0.12 per share. The remaining $100,000 investment was completed in January 2010 and was paid in cash.  The investment follows the collaboration between the
·  Company and Numoda announced in June 2008 and represents partial payment by the Company under its collaboration agreement. The Company recognized $400,000 of research and development costs during March 2009 as a result of this transaction.consideration for services performed.
 
F-27

·  
In February 2009, the Company entered into a collaboration and supply agreement with Sigma-Tau for the commercialization of orBec®.  In connection with the execution of the collaboration agreement, the Company entered into a common stock purchase agreement with Sigma-Tau pursuant to which the Company sold 25,000,000 shares of common stock to Sigma-Tau for $0.18 per share, representing an aggregate price of $4,500,000. The purchase price was equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the average trading price of the Company’s common stock over the five trading days prior to closing. As part of the transaction, the Company granted Sigma-Tau certain demand and piggy-back registration rights.
Warrants

·  
In January 2009, the Company received $2,384,200 from the completed private placement of common stock and warrants to accredited investors. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company sold 20,914,035 common shares together with five year warrants to purchase up to 20,914,035 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.14 per share, for an aggregate price of $2,384,200, or $0.114 per share, representing a premium to the Company’s common stock market price on the date of the agreements. The expiration date of the warrants can be accelerated if the Company's common stock meets certain price thresholds and the Company would receive additional gross proceeds of approximately $2,900,000 if they are all exercised.
During 2011, the Company issued warrants to purchase 4,750 shares of common stock to consultants in exchange for their services. During 2010, in addition to warrants issued above in the June private placement, the Company issued warrants to purchase 27,000 shares of common stock to consultants in exchange for their services. Expense charges of $11,184 and $67,052 were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, as a result of these issuances which represented the estimated fair value of the services provided.

Equity Line

In February 2008, the Company entered into a common stock purchase agreement with Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC (“Fusion Capital”). The Fusion Capital equity facility allows the Company to require Fusion Capital to purchase between $80,000 and $1.0 million of the Company’s common stock every two business days, up to an aggregate of $8.0 million over approximately a 25-month period depending on certain conditions, including the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock on such date. As part of the agreement, the Company issued Fusion Capital 1,275,00063,750 shares of common stock as a commitment fee. In connection with the execution of the common stock purchase agreement, Fusion Capital made an initial purchase of 2,777,778138,889 common shares and received a four year warrant to purchase 1,388,88969,445 shares of common stoc kstock for $0.22$4.40 per share, representing an aggregate price of $500,000. The Company issued an additional 75,0003,750 shares of common stock as a commitment fee in connection with this $500,000 purchase. 

F-24

If the Company’s stock price exceeds $0.15,$3.00, then the amount required to be purchased may be increased under certain conditions as the price of the Company’s common stock increases. The Company cannot require Fusion Capital to purchase any shares of the Company’s common stock on any trading days that the market price of the Company’s common stock is less than $0.10$2.00 per share. Furthermore, for each additional purchase by Fusion, additional commitment shares in commensurate amounts up to a total of 1,275,00063,750 shares will be issued based upon the relative proportion of purchases compared to the total commitment maximum of 18.5 million925,000 shares. The total issuance of common stock related to commitment shares for 2008 was 1,369,12568,456 shares, which were issued to Fusion Capital and consisted of 1,275,00063,750 shares as a commitm entcommitment fee, 75,0003,750 shares as a commitment fee for the $500,000 invested, and 19,125957 shares for the commitment fee shares on the equity line draws totaling $127,500.

During the year ended December 31, 2008,2011 and 2010, the Company issued 993,08490,789 and 14,705 shares of common stock, respectively, under the Fusion Capital equity facility. In connection with these issuances the Company received $127,500$355,000 and $70,000, respectively, in proceeds which approximated the shares’ fair market value on the dates of issuance.

The Fusion equity line expired in October 2011.
Note 8.6. Stock Option Plans and Warrants to Purchase Common Stock

Stock Option Plans

The Amended and Restated 1995 Omnibus Plan is divided into four separate equity programs:

1)  the Discretionary Option Grant Program, under which eligible persons may, at the discretion of the Plan Administrator, be granted options to purchase shares of common stock,
2)   the Salary Investment Option Grant Program, under which eligible employees may elect to have a portion of their base salary invested each year in options to purchase shares of common stock,
3)  the Automatic Option Grant Program, under which eligible nonemployee Board members will automatically receive options at periodic intervals to purchase shares of common stock, and
4)  the Director Fee Option Grant Program, under which non-employee Board members may elect to have all, or any portion, of their annual retainer fee otherwise payable in cash applied to a special option grant.
F-28

The 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (“2005 Plan”) is divided into four separate equity programs:

1)  the Discretionary Option Grant Program, under which eligible persons may, at the discretion of the Plan Administrator, be issued common stock or granted options to purchase shares of common stock,
2)  the Salary Investment Option Grant Program, under which eligible employees may elect to have a portion of their base salary invested each year in options to purchase shares of common stock,
3)  the Automatic Option Grant Program, under which eligible nonemployee Board members will automatically receive options at periodic intervals to purchase shares of common stock, and
4)  the Director Fee Option Grant Program, under which non-employee Board members may elect to have all, or any portion, of their annual retainer fee otherwise payable in cash applied to a special option grant.
The 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (“2005 Plan”) is divided into four separate equity programs:

1)  the Discretionary Option Grant Program, under which eligible persons may, at the discretion of the Plan Administrator, be issued common stock or granted options to purchase shares of common stock,
2)  the Salary Investment Option Grant Program, under which eligible employees may elect to have a portion of their base salary invested each year in options to purchase shares of common stock,
3)  the Automatic Option Grant Program, under which eligible nonemployee Board members will automatically receive options at periodic intervals to purchase shares of common stock, and
4)  the Director Fee Option Grant Program, under which non-employee Board members may elect to have all, or any portion, of their annual retainer fee otherwise payable in cash applied to a special option grant.

In addition, under the 2005 Plan, the Board may elect to pay certain consultants, directors, and employees in common stock. The 2005 Plan was amended in September 2007 to increase the number of options available under the plan to 20,000,000.

F-29

1,000,000 and again in 2010 to increase the number of shares under the plan to 1,750,000.

The table below only accounts for transactions occurring as part of the amended 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.

  December 31, 
  2011  2010 
Shares available for grant at beginning of year  396,223   22,742 
Increase in shares available for the plan  -   750,000 
Options granted  (523,344)  (439,625)
Options forfeited or expired  187,813   63,106 
         
Shares available for grant at end of year  60,692   396,223 
F-25

December 31,Table of Content
  2009  2008 
Shares available for grant at beginning of year  3,547,331   10,612,961 
  Options granted  (3,712,500)  ( 6,800,000)
  Options forfeited or expired  620,000   100,000 
  Common stock payment for services  -   ( 365,630)
Shares available for grant at end of year  454,831   3,547,331 

The total option activity for the 1995 plan and the amended 2005 plan for the years ended December 31, 20092011 and 20082010 was as follows:

 
 
Options
  
Weighted Average
Options Exercise Price
  
 
Options
 
Weighted Average
Options Exercise Price
 
Balance at January 1, 2008  10,349,839  $0.44 
Balance at December 31, 2009  965,581   4.78 
Granted  6,800,000   0.06   439,625   4.55 
Exercised  (34,044)  1.38 
Forfeited  ( 779,800)  0.81   (63,106)  3.90 
Balance at December 31, 2008  16,370,039  $0.27 
Balance at December 31, 2010  1,308,056  $4.84 
Granted  3,712,500   0.17   523,344   1.68 
Exercised  (79,844)  3.18 
Forfeited  ( 771,000)  0.51   (207,314)  1.88 
Balance at December 31, 2009  19,311,539  $0.24 
Balance at December 31, 2011  1,544,242  $3.75 

In 2009The Company awarded 523,344 and 2008 there439,625 stock options to new employees and new and existing Board members during in 2011 and 2010, respectively. Of the 2011 grants, 352,500 stock options were no stock option exercises.issued to employees on December 1, 2011 under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. Expense of $715,805 was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2011, which represent fair value of the options.

The weighted-average exercise price, by price range, for outstanding options to purchase common stock at December 31, 20092011 was:

Price
Range
 
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life in Years
  
Outstanding
 Options
  
Exercisable Options
 
$0.06-$0.11   8.6   7,925,000   4,287,500 
$0.14-$0.22   8.8   2,062,500   1,178,126 
$0.27-$0.45   6.5   5,475,000   5,250,000 
$0.47-$0.58   6.3   3,525,000   3,154,692 
$0.74-$3.94   2.8   324,039   324,039 
Total   7.5   19,311,539   14,194,357 
Intrinsic Value  $-  $- 
Price Range 
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life in Years
  Outstanding Options  Exercisable Options 
$0.64-$2.20  8.6   638,300   373,925 
$2.80-$4.10  8.7   263,657   182,922 
$4.64-$8.60  6.8   483,531   379,641 
$9.40-$11.60  4.8   150,000   150,000 
$14.80-$25.60  1.7   8,754   8,754 
Total  7.7   1,544,242   1,095,242 

Stock options are issued at the market price on the date of issuance. Stock options issued to directors are fully vested upon issuance. Stock options issued to employees generally vest 25% upfront, then 25% each year for a period of three years. Stock options vest over each three month period from the date of issuance to the end of the three year period. These options have a ten year life for as long as the individuals are employees or directors. In general when an employee or director terminates employment the options will expire within six months.

The intrinsic value was calculated as the difference between the Company’s common stock closing price on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board at December 31, 2009 and the exercise price of the stock option issued multiplied by the number of stock options. The Company’s common stock price at December 31, 2009 was $0.25.
F-30

The Company’s share-based compensation for the years ended December 31, 20092011 and 20082010 was $579,066$715,805 and $385,616,$571,545, respectively. At December 31, 2009,2011, the total compensation cost for stock options not yet recognized was approximately $440,851$781,365 and will be expensed over the next three years.

Warrants to Purchase Common stock

Warrant activity for the years ended December 31, 20092011 and 20082010 was as follows:
 
 
 
Warrants
  
Weighted Average
Warrant Exercise Price
  
 
Warrants
 
Weighted Average
Warrant Exercise Price
 
Balance at January 1, 2008  29,209,341  $0.69 
Balance at December 31, 2009  2,123,644  $4.81 
Granted  2,079,444   0.20   950,014   5.59 
Exercised  (20,000)  1.50 
Expired  (10,938,637)  1.13   (349,839)  19.85 
Balance at December 31, 2008  20,350,148  $0.41 
Balance at December 31, 2010  2,703,819  $4.40 
Granted  32,906,540   0.18   4,750   3.85 
Exercised  -   - 
Expired  (10,783,814)  0.38   (7,000)  0.66 
Balance at December 31, 2009  42,472,874  $0.24 
Balance at December 31, 2011  2,701,569  $4.40 

F-26

During 2009,2011, the Company issued 1,575,000 warrants to purchase 4,750 shares of common stock, shareswith exercise prices ranging from $3.80 to $3.96, to consultants in exchange for their services with exercise prices ranging from $0.10 to $0.31.services. Expense charges of $190,655$11,184 were recorded during 2009 to reflect these issuances.

The weighted-average exercise price, by price range, for outstanding warrants at December 31, 20092010 was:

Price
Range
  
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life in Years
  
Outstanding
 Warrants
  
Exercisable Warrants
 
$0.06-$0.11   3.4   1,350,000   1,350,000 
$0.12-$0.14   4.0   22,014,035   22,014,035 
$0.19-$0.22   2.4   2,264,445   2,264,445 
$0.28-$0.31   4.7   9,357,505   9,357,505 
$0.51-$0.63   .7   7,486,889   7,486,889 
Total   3.5   42,472,874   42,472,874 
Price Range 
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life in Years
  Outstanding Warrants  Exercisable Warrants 
$2.00-$2.20  2.1   52,500   52,500 
$2.80-$2.80  2.1   1,095,702   1,095,702 
$3.80-$4.40  0.4   111,972   111,972 
$5.00-$6.20  3.2   1,413,389   1,413,389 
$11.80-$11.80  0.1   28,005   28,005 
Total  2.6   2,701,568   2,701,568 

During 2010,2012, warrants to purchase approximately 7,326,783138,228 shares of the Company’s common stock will expire.

Note 9.7. Concentrations

At December 31, 20092011 and 2008,2010, the Company had deposits in major financial institutions that exceeded the amount under protection by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”). Currently, we arethe Company is covered up to $1,000,000 by the SIPC. The excess amounts at December 31, 20092011 and 20082010 were approximately $6,692,000$4,996,668 and $475,000,$6,451,714, respectively.

F-31

Note 10.8. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company has a contractual obligationcommitments of approximately $3.3 million$80,000 as of December 31, 20092011 in connection with a collaborationan agreement with Numoda Corporation for the execution ofelectronic data capture in connection with its confirmatory Phase 3 clinical trial of orBec®orBec® in the treatment of acute GI GVHD that began in September 2009 and is expected to completewas stopped for futility in first half ofSeptember 2011.
The Company also has  Additionally, there are several licensing agreements with consultants and universities, which upon clinical or commercialization success may require the payment of milestones and/or royalties if and when achieved. However, there can be no assurance that clinical or commercialization success will occur.

On April 1, 2009, the Company entered into a sub-lease agreement through March 31, 2012 for office space in Princeton, New Jersey. The Company was required to provide 4 months of rent as a security deposit. The rent for the first 18 months will bewas approximately $7,500 per month, or $17.00 per square foot. This rent increasesincreased to approximately $7,650 per month, or $17.50 per square foot, for the remaining 18 months.

The Company records rent on a straight line basis.  On April 24, 2008,February 7, 2012, the Company signedentered into a three year lease agreement through March 31, 2015 for existing office space. The rent for the first 12 months is approximately $8,000 per month, or approximately $18.25 per square foot.  This rent increases to approximately $8,310 per month, or approximately $19.00 per square foot, for the remaining 24 months.
In February 2007, the Company’s  Board of Directors authorized the issuance of the following number of shares to each of Dr. Schaber and Dr. Brey immediately prior to the completion of a copier.transaction, or series or a combination of related transactions negotiated by its Board of Directors whereby, directly or indirectly, a majority of its capital stock or a majority of its assets are transferred from the Company and/or its stockholders to a third party: 50,000 common shares to Dr. Schaber and 10,000 common shares to Dr. Brey. The amended agreement with Dr. Schaber includes its obligation to issue such shares if such event occurs.

Employees with employment contracts have severance agreements that will provide separation benefits from the Company if they are involuntarily separated from employment. On February 15, 2012, Mr. Myrianthopoulos’ employment agreement was terminated. However, he continues to serve the Company as a consultant on business development and other related matters.

F-27

As a result of the above agreements, the Company has future contractual obligations over the next five years as follows:

Year
 Research and Development  
Property and
Other Leases
  Total  Research and Development  Property and Other Leases  Severance  Total 
2010 $3,013,640  $95,398  $3,109,038 
2011  631,440   92,699   724,139 
2012  155,000   22,950   177,950  $235,000  $100,621  $154,362  $489,983 
2013  75,000   -   75,000   75,000   104,559   -   179,559 
2014  75,000   -   75,000   75,000   101,198   -   176,198 
2015  75,000   24,938   -   99,938 
2016  75,000   -   -   75,000 
Total $3,950,080  $211,047  $4,161,127  $535,000  $331,316  $154,362  $1,020,678 

 
F-32


Note 11.9. Operating Segments

The Company maintains two active operating segments:  BioTherapeutics and Vaccines/BioDefense. Each segment includes an element of overhead costs specifically associated with its operations. Aoperations, with its corporate shared services group responsible for support functions generic to both operating segments is presented separately.segments.

 For the Year Ended December 31,  For the Year Ended December 31, 
 2009  2008  2011 2010 
Revenues            
BioDefense
 $1,670,536  $2,269,647 
BioTherapeutics
  1,145,501   40,618 
Vaccines/BioDefense $2,010,234  $1,441,228 
BioTherapeutics 1
  5,652,588   506,400 
Total $2,816,037  $2,310,265  $7,662,822  $1,947,628 
                
Loss from Operations                
BioDefense
 $(389,157) $(132,272)
Vaccines/BioDefense $(154,395) $(1,204,824)
BioTherapeutics
  (3,444,838)  (1,556,429)  (1,278,156)  (5,018,090)
Corporate
  (2,217,301)  (1,767,123)  (1,527,644)  (1,655,507)
Total $(6,051,296) $(3,455,824) $(2,960,195) $(7,878,421)
                
Amortization and Depreciation Expense                
BioDefense
 $91,420  $85,354 
Vaccines/BioDefense $42,640  $36,843 
BioTherapeutics
  77,496   58,829   181,213   146,832 
Corporate
  6,688   5,000   2,174   2,021 
Total $175,604  $149,183  $226,027  $185,696 
                
Interest Income, Net         
Interest Income         
Corporate
 $21,920  $37,073  $7,444  $12,074 
                
Stock-Based Compensation                
BioDefense
 $66,434  $92,822 
Vaccines/BioDefense $78,622  $106,842 
BioTherapeutics
  144,398   89,346   426,666   195,252 
Corporate
  368,234   203,448   210,517   269,451 
Total  $579,066  $385,616  $715,805  $571,545 
 As of December 31, 
  2009   2008 
        
Identifiable Assets        
BioDefense
 $787,225  $1,076,854 
BioTherapeutics
  784,282   650,179 
Corporate
  7,812,775   1,635,702 
Total $9,384,282  $3,362,735 
        

  As of December 31, 
   2011   2010 
         
Identifiable Assets        
Vaccines/BioDefense $689,266  $480,995 
BioTherapeutics  753,767   927,973 
Corporate  6,780,625   7,859,579 
                       Total $8,223,658  $9,268,547 
1BioTherapeutics revenues for 2011 include the receipt of a $5 million licensing fee from Sigma-Tau in July 2011.
 
F-33F-28

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 
To the Board of Directors of Soligenix, Inc.,

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Soligenix, Inc. (formerly DOR BioPharma, Inc.) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20092011 and 20082010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.  These consolidated2011. The financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sCompany's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance witwith the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our auditaudits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriateappropri­ate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principalsprinciples used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all materialsmaterial respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company atSoligenix, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20092011 and 2008,2010, and the consolidated results of itstheir operations and itstheir cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,2011, in conformity with U.S.accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles.

in the United States of America.
 
/s/ Amper, Politziner & Mattia,EisnerAmper LLP

Edison, New Jersey
March 31, 201026, 2012
 
 
F-34F-29

 
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

ITEM 13.    Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.
ITEM 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

The following table sets forth the estimated costs and expenses of the Registrant in connection with the offering described in the registration statement.  All of the amounts shown are estimated except for the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) registration fee.

SEC registration fee  $837  $955 
Legal fees and expenses  $15,000  $15,000 
Accounting fees and expenses  $5,000  $5,000 
Miscellaneous  $1,000  $1,000 
    
TOTAL  $21,837  $21,955 

ITEM 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
ITEM 14.    Indemnification
Section 145(a) of Directorsthe Delaware General Corporation Law provides, in general, that a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation), because he or she is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and Officers.amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding, if he or she acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.
Section 145(b) of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides, in general, that a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor because the person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit if he or she acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification shall be made with respect to any claim, issue or matter as to which he or she shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the Court of Chancery or other adjudicating court determines that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all of the circumstances of the case, he or she is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the Court of Chancery or other adjudicating court shall deem proper.
Section 145(g) of the Delaware General Corporation Law provides, in general, that a corporation may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any such capacity, or arising out of his or her status as such, whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify the person against such liability under Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law grants the Registrant the power to limit the personal liability of its directors to the Registrant or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of a fiduciary duty. Article X of the Registrant’sRegistrant's Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, provides for the limitation of personal liability of the directors of the Registrant as follows:
II-1


"A Director of the Corporation shall have no personal liability to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of his fiduciary duty as a Director; provided, however, this Article shall not eliminate or limit the liability of a Director (i) for any breach of the Director’sDirector's duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders; (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; (iii) for the unlawful payment of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases under Section 174 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware; or (iv) for any transaction from which the Director derived an improper personal benefit. If the General Corporation Law is amended after approval by the stockholders of this Article to authorize corporate action fur therfurther eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors, then the liability of a director of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as so amended."
 
Article VIII of the Registrant’sRegistrant's Bylaws, as amended and restated, provide for indemnification of directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

The Registrant has a directors’directors' and officers’officers' liability insurance policy.

The above discussion is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Registrant’sRegistrant's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws.

ITEM 15.   Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.
ITEM 15.Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

During 2008,In January 2010, the Registrant issued 310,86020,161 shares of the Registrant's common stock for services renderedpursuant to the Registrant.Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 11, 2009 with its clinical trials management partner, Numoda Corporation.  The shares were priced at the then current 5-day average market price of common stock were offered in transactions$5.00 per share.  The issuance of the shares was exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon Rule 506 of Regulation D under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, as transactions not involving a public offering.

On February 14, 2008, the Registrant entered into a common stock purchase agreement with Fusion Capital. Pursuant to the agreement, as amended, the Registrant has issued 4,746,192 shares of common stock to
Fusion Capital (together with a four-year warrant to purchase 1,388,889 shares of common stock and a five-year warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock that are not part of this offering) for total proceeds of $812,500.  Under the terms of the agreement, Fusion Capital received a commitment fee consisting of 1,275,000 shares of common stock upon the execution of the agreement. The Registrant has issued 121,875 additional shares as a pro rata commitment fee in connection with the purchase by Fusion Capital of the $812,500 of common stock.  The Registrant also will issue to Fusion Capital an additional 1,153,125 shares as a commitment fee pro rata as it receives the $7,687,500 of future funding.  Such securities were issued, and will be issued in the future, pursuant to an exemption provided by Sec tion 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder.
II-1


During May 2008, the Registrant issued 347,222 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.18 per share to Numoda Corporation for services rendered to the Registrant. The shares of common stock were offered in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon Rule 506 of Regulation D under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, as transactions not involving a public offering.

During June 2008, the Registrant issued warrants to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.12 per share for services rendered to the Registrant. The warrants were offered in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon Rule 506 of Regulation D under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, as transactions not involving a public offering.

On December 1, 2008, the Registrant issued 16,666,667 shares of common stock in connection with the letter of intent entered into with Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for $1,500,000. Such securities were issued pursuant to an exemption provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder.as a transaction not involving a public offering.

During December 2008,In five separate transactions during 2010, the Registrant issued warrants to purchase up to 300,000an aggregate of 14,705 shares of common stock atunder its existing Fusion Capital equity facility. The Registrant received an exercise priceaggregate of $0.06 per share to Little Gem Life Sciences Fund, LLC for services rendered to$70,000 in proceeds which approximated the Registrant.shares' fair market value on the date of issuance.  The warrants were offered in transactionsissuance of the shares was exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon Rule 506 of Regulation D underpursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as transactionsamended, as a transaction not involving a public offering.

On January 20, 2009,June 18, 2010, the Registrant completed a private placement in which it issued 20,914,0351,440,068 shares of common stock at $0.114 per share, and warrants to purchase 20,914,035up to 864,040 shares of common stock, resulting in netaggregate proceeds of $2,384,200.  Also, as part of the compensation received for its assistance in the private placement, the placement agent received $114,000 cash and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of the Registrant's common stock at an exercise price of $0.14 per share.  The shares of common stock and warrants were issued in transactions exempt$5,904,277.  Excluding investment proceeds from registration under the Securities Act, in reliance upon Rule 506 of Regulation D under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, as transactions not involving a public offering.

During January 2009, the Registrant issued warrants to purchase up to 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share for services rendered by consultants to the Registrant. The warrants were offered in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon Rule 506 of Regulation D under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, as transactions not involving a public offering.
On February 11, 2009, the Registrant issued warrants to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.11 per share to Dr. George B. McDonald for services rendered to the Registrant. The warrants were offered in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon Rule 506 of Regulation D under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, as transactions not involving a public offering.

On February 11, 2009, the Registrant issued 25 million shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.18 per share in connection with the collaboration and supply agreement entered into with Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and certain other investors, the Registrant paid an aggregate placement agent/finder’s fee to three different entities for $4,500,000. Such securities were issued pursuantup to an exemption provided by Section 4(2)five percent of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder.
II-2


During March 2009, the Registrant issued 2,500,000 shares of common stock to Numoda Corporation for services rendered to the Registrant. The shares were offered in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon Rule 506 of Regulation D under Section 4(2)balance of the Securities Act, as transactions not involving a public offering.

On September 28, 2009, the Registrant completed a private placement in which it issued 17,352,569 shares of common stock at $0.253 per share, and warrants to purchase 8,676,285 shares of common stock, resulting in net proceeds of $4,390,200.  Also, as part of the compensation received for its assistance in the private placement, the placement agent received $137,500 cash and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 543,478 shares of the Registrant's common stock at an exercise price of $0.278 per share.offering proceeds.  The shares of common stock and warrants were issued in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act, in reliance upon Rule 506 of Regulation D under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, as transactions not involving a public offering.

In January 2010,sixteen separate transactions during the year ended December 31, 2011, the Registrant issued 403,225an aggregate of 90,789 shares of common stock under the common stock purchase agreement with Fusion Capital. The purchase price was calculated in accordance with the formula set forth in the purchase agreement. The Registrant received an aggregate of $355,000 in proceeds which approximated the shares’ fair market value on the dates of issuance. The issuance of the shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as a transaction not involving a public offering.

On July 26, 2011, as a result of granting Sigma-Tau an exclusive license to commercialize orBec® in the European Territory, the Registrant amended the license agreement with Dr. George McDonald and issued 66,890 shares of common stock in lieu of a $400,000 cash obligation. The purchase price was based upon the closing price of $5.98 on July 26, 2011.  The issuance of the shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as a transaction not involving a public offering.

On November 10, 2011, the Registrant issued 25,625 shares of common stock in connection with an employee’s severance from the Registrant.  The closing price of the Registrant’s common stock on November 10, 2011 was $0.80 per share.  The issuance of the shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 11, 2009 withSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, as a transaction not involving a public offering.

On December 19, 2011, the Registrant issued 29,297 shares of its clinical trials management partner, Numoda Corporation.common stock to a consultant as partial consideration for services rendered. The shares were priced at the then current 5-day average marketclosing price of $0.25the Registrant’s common stock on December 19, 2011 was $0.53 per share.  The issuance of the shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as a transaction not involving a public offering.

In five separate transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Registrant issued an aggregate of 294,091 shares of common stock under its existing Fusion Capital equity facility. The Registrant received an aggregate of $70,000 in proceeds which approximated the shares’ fair market value on the date of issuance.

On June 18, 2010, the Registrant completed a private placement in which it issued 28,801,351 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase up to 17,280,810 shares of common stock, resulting in aggregate proceeds of $5,904,277. Excluding investment proceeds from Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and certain other investors, the Registrant will pay an aggregate placement agent/finder's fee to three different entities for up to five percent of the balance of the offering proceeds. The shares of common stock and warrants were issued in transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act, in reliance upon Rule 506 of Regulation D under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, as transactions not involving a public offering.
II-3

ITEM 16. Exhibits.

2.1
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated May 10, 2006 by and among the Company, Corporate Technology Development, Inc., Enteron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and CTD Acquisition, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 included in our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-133975) filed on May 10, 2006).
3.1
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, as amended, for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003).
3.2
Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 included in our Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-130801) filed on December 30, 2005).
3.3
Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Annex A to our Proxy Statement filed December 12, 2006).
3.4
Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 included in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-162375) filed on October 7, 2009).
3.5
Certificate of Amendment toSecond Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on September 30, 2009)June 22, 2012).
3.6
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on June 22, 2007).
3.73.3
By-laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, as amended, for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2003).
4.1
Form of Warrant issued to each investor in the February 2005 private placement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on February 3, 2005).
4.2
Form of Warrant issued to each investor in the April 2006 private placement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on April 7, 2006).
4.3
Form of Warrant issued to finders in connection with the February 2007 private placement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 included in our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on April 16, 2007).
4.4
Rights Agreement dated June 22, 2007, between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on June 22, 2007).
4.5
Form of Right Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on June 22, 2007).
4.6
Warrant dated February 14, 2008, issued to Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 included in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-149239) filed on February 14, 2008).
  
II-4

4.74.2
Form of Warrant issued to each investor in the February 2008 private placement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 in our current report on Form 8-K filed on January 21, 2009).
4.8
Form of Warrant issued to each investor in the January 2009 private placement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 included in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-149239) filed on February 14, 2008).
4.9
4.3Form of Warrant issued to each investor in the September 2009 private placement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009).
4.10
4.4Warrant dated April 19, 2010, issued to Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC.LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 included in our Post-Effective Amendment to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-149239) filed on April 20, 2010).
4.11
4.5Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued to each investor in the June 2010 private placement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on June 18, 2010).
5.1
5.1Opinion of Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLP. ***
10.1
Amended and Restated 1995 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, as amended, for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003). **
10.2
License Agreement between the Company and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.810.9 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed March 30, 2004, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004).
10.3
License Agreement between the Company and Thomas Jefferson University (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004).
10.4
License Agreement between the Company and the University of Texas Medical Branch (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004).
10.5
Consulting Agreement between the Company and Lance Simpson of Thomas Jefferson University. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB as amended for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002).
 
10.6
Employment agreement between the Company and Evan Myrianthopoulos dated December 7, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004). **
10.7
2005 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix D to our Proxy Statement filed December 12, 2005). **
10.8
10.7Form S-8 Registration of Stock Options Plan dated December 30, 2005 (incorporated by reference to our registration statement on Form S-8 filed on December 30, 2005).
  
II-5

10.910.8
Employment Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2006, between Christopher J. Schaber, Ph.D., and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on August 30, 2006). **
10.10
Letter of Intent dated January 3, 2007 by and between the Company and Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2007).
10.11
Securities Purchase Agreement dated February 7, 2007 by and among the Company and the investors named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2007).
10.1210.9
Registration Rights Agreement dated February 7, 2007 by among the Company and the investors named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on February 12, 2007).
10.13
Letter from Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. dated February 21, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2007).
10.14
10.10Letter dated May 3, 2007 between the Company and Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on May 4, 2007).
10.15
10.11Employment Agreement dated December 27, 2007, between Christopher J.  Schaber, PhD and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008). **
10.16
10.12Employment Agreement dated December 27, 2007, between Evan Myrianthopoulos and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008). **
10.17
Employment Agreement dated December 27, 2007, between James Clavijo, CPA and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008). **
10.1810.13
Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 14, 2008, between the Company and Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 included in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on February 14, 2008).
10.19
10.14Registration Rights Agreement dated February 14, 2008, between the Company and Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 included in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-149239) filed on February 14, 2008).
10.20
10.15Letter dated December 1, 2008, between the Company and Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on December 1, 2008).
II-6

10.21
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and each investor dated February 14, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 included in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-149239) filed on February 14, 2008).
  
10.22
Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated January 12, 2009, between the Company and accredited investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on January 21, 2009).
10.23
Registration Rights Agreement dated January 12, 2009, between the Company and accredited investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on January 21, 2009).
10.24
Registration Rights Agreement dated January 12, 2009, between the Company and accredited investors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on January 21, 2009).
10.2510.16
 
Exclusive License Agreement dated November 24, 1998, between Enteron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and George B. McDonald, M.D.MD and amendments (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 included in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-157322) filed on February 13, 2009).
10.2610.17
 
Collaboration and Supply Agreement dated February 11, 2009, between the Company and Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 included in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-157322)  filed on February 13, 2009). †
10.27
Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated February 11, 2009, between the Company and Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 included in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-157322)  filed on February 13, 2009).
10.2810.18
Sublease Agreement dated April 1, 2009, between the Company and BioWa, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 included in our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-157322) filed on April 14, 2009).
10.29
Employment Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2009, between Christopher P. Schnittker, CPA and the Company. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on July 7, 2009).
10.30
Securities Purchase Agreement dated September 23, 2009 among the Company and the investors named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009).
10.31
Registration Rights Agreement dated September 23, 2009 among the Company and the investors named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2009).
10.32
Letter Agreement dated September 25, 2009 between the Company and BAM Opportunity Fund, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 included in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-162375) filed on October 7, 2009).
10.33
Letter Agreement dated September 23, 2009 between the Company and Iroquois Master Fund, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 included in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-162375) filed on October 7, 2009).
  
II-7

10.3410.19
First Amendment to Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated April 19, 2010 between the Company and Fusion Capital Fund II, LLC.LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1010.34 included in our Post-Effective Amendment to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-149239) filed on April 20, 2010).
10.35
Securities Purchase
10.20Amendment to Employment Agreement dated June 15, 2010 among the Companyas of January 4, 2011, between Soligenix, Inc. and the investors named thereinEvan Myrianthopoulos (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on June 18, 2010)January 6, 2011). **
10.3610.21
Registration RightsEmployment Agreement dated June 15, 2010 among the Companyas of January 31, 2011 between Kevin Horgan, M.D., and the investors named thereinSoligenix, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.310.1 included in our current report on Form 8-K filed on June 18, 2010)February 2, 2011).
**
10.22Employment Agreement dated as of May 31, 2011, between Joseph M. Warusz and Soligenix, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our current report on Form 8-K filed on May 31, 2011).**
10.23First Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of July 12, 2011, between Soligenix, Inc. and Christopher J. Schaber, PhD (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our current report on Form 8-K filed on July 14, 2011).**
10.24Second Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of July 12, 2011, between Soligenix, Inc. and Evan Myrianthopoulos (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our current report on Form 8-K filed on July 14, 2011).**
10.25Amendment to the Collaboration and Supply Agreement dated July 26, 2011, between Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Soligenix, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our current report on Form 8-K filed on July 28, 2011).
10.26Amendment to the Exclusive License Agreement dated as of July 26, 2011, between George McDonald, MD and Soligenix, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our current report on Form 8-K filed on July 28, 2011).
10.27Lease Agreement dated as of February 7, 2012, between CPP II , LLC and Soligenix, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011).
10.28Separation Agreement dated February 15, 2012, between Evan Myrianthopoulos and Soligenix, Inc. *
10.29First Amendment to Separation Agreement dated July 2, 2012, between Evan Myrianthopoulos and Soligenix, Inc. *
10.30Form of Securities Purchase Agreement.  ***
10.31Form of Warrant. ***
21.1
Subsidiaries of the Company.*
23.1
Consent of Amper, Politziner & Mattia, LLP, independent registered public accounting firm.EisnerAmper LLP. *
23.2Consent of Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLC (contained in the opinion filed as Exhibit 5.1 hereto). ***
________________
*
**
***
Filed herewith.
Indicates management contract or compensatory plan.
To be filed by amendment.
Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.

ITEM 17. Undertakings.

ITEM 17.    Undertakings.The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

(a) The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes as follows:  
1.  (1)To file, during any period in which it offers or sells securities,sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:statement:

i. (i)
Include
To include any prospectus required by sectionSection 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act;
 
ii. 
Reflect(ii)
To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or together,in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the forgoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation From the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in the volume and price represent no more than a 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the "Calculation of Regist ration Fee" table in the effective registration statement.statement;
 
II-5

ii. 
Include(iii)
To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement.statement;

provided, however, that paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii) do not apply if the registration statement is on Form S-3 or Form S-8, and the information required to be included in a post-effective amendment by those paragraphs is contained in periodic reports filed by the registrant pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act that are incorporated by reference in the registration statement.
 
2.  (2)For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b) (1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.

(3)That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

3.  (4)
To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered thatwhich remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

4.  That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities, the undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:

i.  
Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;

ii.  
Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;

iii.  
The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and

iv.  
Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
(b) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

Each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.

 
II-8II-6

 
SIGNATURES

 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Princeton, State of New Jersey, on the 25th5th day of June, 2010.November, 2012.


SOLIGENIX, INC.
By:/s/ Christopher J. Schaber
Christopher J. Schaber, PhD
Chief Executive Officer and President

By: /s/ Christopher J. Schaber
Christopher J. Schaber, Chief Executive Officer and President

Date: June 25, 2010

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Christopher J. Schaber and Evan Myrianthopoulos,Joseph Warusz, and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this Post-Effective Amendment to Registration Statement on Form S-1 (including post-effective amendments), and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to al lall intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated. 

Signature Title Date
 
By:
/s/Christopher J. Schaber
    
 Christopher J. Schaber, PhD 
Chairman , President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
 June 25, 2010
November 5, 2012
By:/s/Evan Myrianthopoulos Keith L. Brownlie    
 Evan MyrianthopoulosKeith L. Brownlie, CPA Director and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) June 25, 2010November 5, 2012
      
By:/s/ Gregg A. Lapointe
Gregg A. Lapointe, CPADirectorNovember 5, 2012
By:
/s/ Robert J. Rubin    
 Robert J. Rubin, MD Director June 25, 2010November 5, 2012
By:
By:/s/ Jerome Zeldis    
 Cyrille F. BuhrmanJerome Zeldis, MD, PhD Director 
June       , 2010
November 5, 2012
 
By:
/s/Gregg A. Lapointe
Joseph M. Warusz
    
 Gregg A. LapointeJoseph M. Warusz, CPA DirectorJune 25, 2010
By:
/s/Christopher P. SchnittkerVice President of Finance, Acting Chief Financial Officer and
Corporate Secretary (principal financial and accounting officer)
 
Christopher P. Schnittker
 Vice President Administration, Controller and Secretary
(Principal Accounting Officer)
June 25, 2010
November 5, 2012

 
II-7
II-9