As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May __, 2010
Registration No. 333-164373


UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

———————————


FORM S-1

S-1/A

(Amendment No. 2)


REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
———————————


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware509427-1338257

Delaware

3910

27-1338257

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(Primary Standard Industrial

Classification Code Number)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)


12 Daniel Road E.

Fairfield, NJ 07004

(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)


12 Daniel Road E. Fairfield,

(973) 227-3230

(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)


Copies to:


Lucosky Brookman LLP

33 Wood Avenue South, 6th Floor

Iselin, New Jersey 07004

(973) 227-3230
08830

Fax: (732) 395-4401


 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)
———————————
Berge Abajian, Chief Executive Officer
12 Daniel Road E. Fairfield, New Jersey 07004
(973) 227-3230

 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)
—————————

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this registration statement becomes effective.

———————————
Approximate Date of Commencement of Proposed Sale to the Public:frompublic: From time to time after the effective date of this Registration Statement as determined by market conditions and other factors.
registration statement. [X]


If any of the securities being registered on this formForm are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box. [X]

[  ]


If this formForm is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [  ]


If this formForm is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [  ]



If this formForm is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [  ]

If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, check the following box. [   ]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Act:


Large acceleratedAccelerated filer

[  ]

Accelerated

Non-accelerated filer

[  ]

Non-accelerated

Accelerated filer

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

[  ]

Smaller reporting company

[X]



The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date




CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE


Title of Class of Securities

to be Registered

 

Amount to

 be Registered (1)

 

Proposed

Maximum

Aggregate

Price Per

Share (2)

 

Proposed

Maximum

Aggregate

Offering

Price

 

Amount of

Registration

Fee (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, issuable pursuant to the Equity Agreement

 

17,500,000

 

0.0036

 

63,000

 

7.22


(1)

We are registering 17,500,000 shares of our common stock (the “Shares”) that we will put to TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP, a Cayman Islands limited partnership (“TCA” or dates as may be necessarythe “Selling Security Holder”), pursuant to delay its effective date untila committed equity facility agreement (the “Equity Agreement”) between the Selling Security Holder and the registrant entered into on December 23, 2011.  In the event of stock splits, stock dividends, or similar transactions involving the registrant’s common stock, the number of shares of common stock registered shall, file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) ofunless otherwise expressly provided, automatically be deemed to cover the additional securities to be offered or issued pursuant to Rule 416 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, or untilas amended (the “Securities Act”).  In the event that adjustment provisions of the Equity Agreement require the registrant to issue more shares than are being registered in this registration statement, shall become effectivefor reasons other than those stated in Rule 416 of the Securities Act, the registrant will file a new registration statement to register those additional shares.


(2)

Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act, using the closing price as reported on such date as the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (the “OTCBB”) on June 21, 2012, which was $0.0036 per share.


(3)

Such fee has already been paid by the Company.











THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(A), MAY DETERMINE.





































The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission acting pursuantis effective. This prospectus is not an offer to said Section 8(a), may determine.

sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.


PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS







SUBJECT TO COMPLETION,

DATED MAY __, 2010
PROSPECTUS
JUNE 27, 2012

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL INC.

3,367,080


17,500,000 Shares of Common Stock


This prospectus (the “Prospectus”) relates to the resale of 3,367,080up to 17,500,000 shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Shares”), by TCA, which are Shares that we will put to TCA by delivering an advance notice pursuant to the Equity Agreement.


The Equity Agreement with TCA provides that, for a period of $0.001, by certain individuals and entities who beneficially own sharestwenty-four (24) months commencing on the effective date of the registration statement, TCA is committed to purchase up to $2,500,000 of our common stock.  We are not selling any sharesmay draw on the facility from time to time, as and when we determine appropriate in accordance with the terms and conditions of our common stockthe Equity Agreement.  The  17,500,000 Shares included in this offering and therefore we will not receive any proceeds from this offering. However,prospectus represent a portion of the Company will receive proceeds fromShares issuable to the sale of our common stockSelling Security Holder under the Securities Purchase Agreement which was entered into between the Company and Tangiers Investors, LP, (“Tangiers”), the selling stockholder. We agreed to allow Tangiers to retain 12% of the proceeds raised under the Securities Purchase Agreement, which is more fully described below.

The shares of our common stock are currently traded on the Over-the-Counter-Bulletin Board.  Our stock will be offered for sale by the selling stockholder at prices established on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board during the term of this offering. The stock prices may be different than prevailing market prices or at privately negotiated prices. April 27, 2010, the last reported sale price of our common stock was $0.038 per share. Our common stock is quoted on the Over-the-Counter-Bulletin Board under the symbol “BRGO.” The market price of our stock will fluctuate based on the demand for the shares of our common stock.
Equity Agreement.


On November 16, 2009 we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Tangiers. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement the Company may, at its discretion, periodically sell to Tangiers shares of its common stock for a total purchase price of up to $25,000,000. For each share of common stock purchased under the Securities Purchase Agreement, Tangiers will pay us 88% of the lowest volume weighted average price of the Company's common stock as quoted by Bloomberg, LP on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board or other principal market on which the Company's common stock is traded for the five days immediately following the notice date. The price paid by Tangiers for the Company's stock shall be determined as of the date of each individual request for an advance under the Securities Purchase Agreement. Tangiers’ obligat ion to purchase shares of the Company's common stock under the Securities Purchase Agreement is subject to certain conditions, including the Company obtaining an effective registration statement for shares of the Company's common stock sold under the Securities Purchase Agreement and is limited to $250,000 per ten consecutive trading days after the advance notice is provided to Tangiers. The Securities Purchase Agreement shall terminate and Tangiers shall have no further obligation to make advances under the Securities Purchase Agreement at the earlier of the passing of 24 months after the date that the Securities and Exchange Commission declares the Company’s registration statement effective or the Company receives advances from Tangiers equal to the $25,000,000. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, Tangiers will received 1,111,111 shares of our common stock as a one-time commitment fee equal to $500,000 of the Company's common stock divided by the lowest volume weighted average price o f the Company's common stock during the 30 days immediately following the date of the Securities Purchase Agreement, as quoted by Bloomberg, LP.  

With the exception of Tangiers, who

TCA is an “underwriter” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with the resale of 1933, noour common stock under the Equity Agreement.  No other underwriter or person has been engaged to facilitate the sale of shares of our common stock in this offering.  TCA will pay us ninety-five percent (95%) of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the five (5) consecutive trading days after the Company delivers to TCA an advance notice in writing requiring TCA to advance funds (an “Advance”) to the Company, subject to the terms of the Equity Agreement.


We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of these Shares offered by the Selling Security Holder.  However, we will receive proceeds from the sale of our Shares under the Equity Agreement.  The proceeds will be used for working capital or general corporate purposes.  We will bear all costs associated with this registration.


Our common stock is quoted on the OTCBB under the symbol “BRGO.OB.”  The Shares registered hereunder are being offered for sale by the Selling Security Holder at prices established on the OTCBB during the term of this offering.   On June 21, 2012, the closing price as reported on the OTCBB was $0.0036 per share.  These prices will fluctuate based on the demand for our common stock.


This investment involves a high degree of risk. You should purchase shares only if you can afford a complete loss.  See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 11.


Neither the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete.  Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.


The date of this prospectus is                         , 2012








TABLE OF CONTENTS


Page

Prospectus Summary

6

Summary Financial Data

10

Risk Factors

11

Forward-Looking Statements

19

Use of Proceeds

19

Selling Security Holders

19

Plan of Distribution

21

Description of Securities to be Registered

23

Description of Business

23

Description of Property

27

Legal Proceedings

27

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

27

Market Price of and Dividends on Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

37

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

38

Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons

39

Executive Compensation

40

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

43

Transactions with Related Persons, Promoters, and Certain Control Persons

44

Additional Information

44

Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities

44

Legal Matters

45

Experts

45


You may only rely on the information contained in this prospectus or that we have referred you to.  We have not authorized anyone to provide you with different information.  This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities other than the common stock offered by this prospectus.  This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any common stock in any circumstances in which such offer or solicitation is unlawful.  Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor any sale made in connection with this prospectus shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in our affairs since the date of this prospectus is correct as of any time after its date.










5



PROSPECTUS SUMMARY


This summary provides an overview of certain information contained elsewhere in this Prospectus and does not contain all of the information that you should consider or that may be important to you.  Before making an investment decision, you should read the entire Prospectus carefully, including the “Risk Factors” section, the financial statements and the notes to the financial statements.  In this Prospectus, the terms “Bergio,” “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Bergio International Inc.


Company Overview


We were incorporated as “Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc.” on July 24, 2007, in the State of Delaware for the purpose of engaging in the exploration of mineral properties. On October 21, 2009, we entered into an exchange agreement with Diamond Information Institute, whereby we acquired all of the issued and outstanding common stock of Diamond Information Institute, Inc. (“Diamond Information Institute”) and changed the name of the Company to Bergio International Inc. (the “Exchange Agreement”).


We currently sell our jewelry to approximately 50 independent jewelry retailers across the United States and have spent over $3 million in branding the Bergio name through tradeshows, trade advertising, national advertising and billboard advertising since launching the line in 1995. Our products consist of a wide range of unique styles and designs made from precious metals such as, gold, platinum, and Karat gold, as well as diamonds and other precious stones. We have approximately 50 to 75 product styles in our inventory, with prices ranging from $400 to $200,000. We have manufacturing control over our line as a result of having a manufacturing facility in New Jersey as well as subcontracts with facilities in Italy and Bangkok.


It is our intention to establish Bergio as a holding company for the purpose of acquiring established jewelry design and manufacturing firms who possess branded product lines. Branded product lines are products and/or collections whereby the jewelry manufacturers have established their products within the industry through advertising in consumer and trade magazines as well as possibly obtaining federally registered trademarks of their products and collections. This is in line with our strategy and belief that a brand name can create an association with innovation, design and quality which helps add value to the individual products as well as facilitate the introduction of new products.


We intend to acquire design and manufacturing firms throughout the United States and Europe. If and when we pursue any potential acquisition candidates, we intend to target the top 10% of the world’s jewelry manufactures that have already created an identity and brand in the jewelry industry. We intend to locate potential candidates through our relationships in the industry and expect to structure the acquisition through the payment of cash, which will most likely be provided from third party financing, as well as our common stock but not cash generated from our operations. In the event we obtain financing from third parties for any potential acquisitions, Bergio may agree to issue our common stock in exchange for the capital received. However, as of the date hereof, we do not have any binding agreements with any potential acquisition candidates.


Our future operations are contingent upon increasing revenues and raising capital for on-going operations and expansion of our product lines. Because we have a limited operating history, you may have difficulty evaluating our business and future prospects.


We also face the risk that we may not be able to effectively implement our business plan. If we are not effective in addressing these risks, we may not operate profitably and we may not have adequate working capital to meet our obligations as they become due.


We have incurred net losses since our inception.  For the three months ended March 31, 2012, we incurred a net loss of $221,669 and used cash of $41,564 in operations.  We currently have sufficient cash to sustain our operations for a period of approximately two months. We will require additional funds through the receipt of conventional sources of capital or through future sales of our common stock, until such time as our revenues are sufficient to meet our cost structure, and ultimately achieve profitable operations. Management estimates that it will need approximately $200,000 over the next twelve months to fund all of the Company’s current product development and marketing projects. There is no assurance we will be successful in raising additional capital or achieving profitable operations.  Furthermore, the large number of shares available from the selling Security Holder pursuant to the prospectus and the depressive effect of the availability of such shares could make it difficult for us to raise funds from other sources.  Wherever



6



possible, our board of directors will attempt to use non-cash consideration to satisfy obligations.  In many instances, we believe that the non-cash consideration will consist of restricted shares of our common stock.  These actions will result in dilution of the ownership interests of existing stockholders and may further dilute common stock book value, and that dilution may be material.


About This Offering


This offering relates to the resale of up to  17,500,000 shares of our common stock by the Selling Security Holder, which are the Shares that we will terminateput to TCA pursuant to the Equity Agreement.  The  17,500,000 shares included in this prospectus represent a portion of the aggregate shares issuable to the Selling Security Holder under the Equity Agreement.  Pursuant to the Equity Agreement:


·

TCA agreed to purchase from the Company, from time to time, in the Companys discretion (subject to the conditions set forth therein), for a period of twenty-four (24) months, aftercommencing on the accompanyingeffective date of the registration statement filed by the Company for resale of the Shares issuable under the Equity Agreement, up to $2,500,000 of the Companys common stock.


·

Pursuant to a registration rights agreement between the Company and TCA entered into in connection with the Equity Agreement, the Company agreed to file a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for the resale of not less than the maximum number of shares of common stock allowable pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act, of shares of common stock issuable under the Equity Agreement, by February 6, 2012.  All fees and expenses incurred in connection with the registrations shall be paid by the Company.


·

Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, in the event the registration statement is not declared effective by the SEC by a date that is no later than one hundred eighty (180) days from December 22, 2011 (the Late Effective Deadline), then in addition to any and all remedies TCA may have at law, in equity or under the Equity Agreement, the Company shall be obligated to pay to TCA, within three (3) trading days from the Late Effective Deadline, and monthly thereafter, as applicable, until the earlier to occur of: (i) the registration statement is declared effective by the SecuritiesSEC; or (ii) until the Maximum Cap(as defined below) is reached, an amount equal to Four Thousand One Hundred Sixty-Six and Exchange Commission. None67/100 Dollars ($4,166.67), up to a total maximum payment of $25,000 (the Maximum Cap).


·

The purchase price for the shares of common stock sold under the Equity Agreement will be equal to ninety-five percent (95%) of the proceeds fromlowest daily volume weighted average price of the sale of ourCompanys common stock for the five (5) consecutive trading days (thePricing Period) after the Company delivers to TCA an Advance notice in writing (theMarket Price) requiring TCA to Advance funds to the Company, subject to the terms of the Equity Agreement.


·

The maximum amount of common stock that TCA shall be obligated to purchase with respect to any single Advance under the Equity Agreement will be the greater of: (i) an amount calculated by multiplying the Market Price applicable to the relevant Advance notice by 300,000 shares or (ii) two hundred percent (200%) of the Market Price applicable to the relevant Advance notice.


·

As further consideration for TCA entering into and structuring the equity facility, the Company shall pay to TCA a fee by issuing to TCA that number of shares of the Companys common stock that equal a dollar amount of one hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars ($125,000) (the “Facility Fee Shares”).  The Facility Fee Shares shall be issued by the selling stockholdersCompany to TCA in four (4) quarterly installments, the first of such issuances being the date of execution of the Equity Agreement. The Company issued 1,736,111 shares of common stock valued at $31,250 for the first installment at the date of execution of the Equity Agreement.  The Company has also recorded common stock issuable for the remaining three installments in the amount of 5,208,333 common shares valued at $93,750.  The number of shares of common stock issuable will be placed in escrow, trust or any similar account.

INVESTING IN OUR COMMON STOCK INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. SEE “RISK FACTORS” BEGINNING ON PAGE 8 TO READ ABOUT FACTORS YOU SHOULD CONSIDER BEFORE BUYING SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK.
NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OF ACCURACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
THE INFORMATION IN THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT COMPLETE AND MAY BE CHANGED. WE MAY NOT SELL THESE SECURITIES UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION IS EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS IS NOT AN OFFER TO SELL THESE SECURITIES AND IT IS NOT SOLICITING AN OFFER TO BUY THESE SECURITIES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE THE OFFER OR SALE IS NOT PERMITTED.
The dateadjusted based on the future market value of this Prospectus is May __, 2010



TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE








GENERAL
As used in this Prospectus, references to “the Company,” “Bergio” “we”, “our,” “ours” and “us” refer to Bergio International, Inc. Inc., unless otherwise indicated. In addition, any references to our “financial statements” are to our consolidated financial statements exceptthe common stock, as the context otherwise requires.
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary does not contain all the information that you should consider before investingdefined in the agreement. 


·

The Company has covenanted that it will, among other things: (i) maintain the listing of its common stock. You should carefully readstock on a principal market, including the entire Prospectus, including “Risk Factors”, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” andOTC Markets; (ii) comply with the Financial Statements, before making an investment decision.

Corporate Background and Our Business
We were incorporated on July 24, 2007 as Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc. under the laws of the state of Delaware.  We formedRegistration Rights Agreement in all material respects; (iii) not enter into a wholly-owned subsidiary, also known as Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc., an Alberta corporation.  Alba Mineral was formed to conduct our originally planned mineral exploration on the Crow Hill mineral claim located on the Baie Verte Peninsula on Newfoundland Island, Canada.
In October 2009, subsequent to our reporting period, we acquired the business operations of Diamond Information Institute, Inc., a New Jersey corporation.  As a result of this transaction, we abandoned our prior business plan to develop the Crown Hill claim, in order to pursue what we perceive to be the superior opportunity presented by the acquired company.  Consequently, we have transferred the rights to Alba Mineral to our former officer and director, Owen Gibson, and certain of our prior shareholders. As a result of the acquisition in October, 2009, we have obtainedmerger or consolidation or transfer all or substantially all of the assets of Diamond Information Institute.
the Company; and (iv) provide an opinion from Company counsel prior to the delivery of the first Advance Notice.


·

Neither the Equity Agreement nor any rights of the parties under the Equity Agreement may be assigned or designated to any other person.


·

The Equity Agreement and the obligations of TCA to make Advances thereunder shall terminate twenty-four (24) months after the effective date of the registration statement filed by the Company for resale of the Shares issuable under the Equity Agreement.


·

Each of the parties shall pay its own fees and expenses in connection with the equity facility, except that the Company shall pay to TCA a fee of $7,500 to cover TCA’s legal and administrative costs in connection with the Equity Agreement.Further, the Company shall pay to TCA a fee of $5,000 to cover TCA’s due diligence costs and expenses in connection with the Equity Agreement.


Our ability to draw down funds and sell shares under the Equity Agreement requires that the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part, be declared effective by the SEC, and that this registration statement continue to be effective. In addition, the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part registers  17,500,000 total shares of our common stock issuable under the Equity Agreement, and our ability to access the Equity Agreement to sell any remaining shares issuable under the Equity Agreement is subject to our ability to prepare and file one or more additional registration statements registering the resale of these shares. These subsequent registration statements may be subject to review and comment by the staff of the SEC, and will require the consent of our independent registered public accounting firm. Therefore, the timing of effectiveness of these subsequent registration statements cannot be assured. The effectiveness of these subsequent registration statements is a condition precedent to our ability to sell the shares of common stock subject to these subsequent registration statements to TCA under the Equity Agreement. Even if we are successful in causing one or more registration statements registering the resale of some or all of the shares issuable under the Equity Agreement to be declared effective by the SEC in a timely manner, we will not be able to sell shares under the Equity Agreement unless certain other conditions are met. Accordingly, because our ability to draw down amounts under the Equity Agreement is subject to a number of conditions, it is not likely that we will be able to draw down the full $2,500,000 available to us under the Equity Agreement.  The  $2,500,000 amount was a negotiated amount agreed upon by the parties based on the circumstances at the time the Equity Agreement was executed.


We relied on an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act.  The transaction does not involve a private offering, TCA is an “accredited investor” and/or qualified institutional buyer and TCA has access to information about the Company and its investment.


At an assumed purchase price under the Purchase Agreement of $0.00342 (equal to 95% of the closing price of our common stock of $0.0036 on June 21, 2012), we will be able to receive up to $59,850 in gross proceeds, assuming the sale of the entire 17,500,000 Shares being registered hereunder pursuant to the Equity Agreement.  At an assumed purchase price of $0.00342 under the Equity Agreement, we would be required to register 713,494,152 additional shares to obtain the balance of $2,500,000 under the Equity Agreement.  The Company is currently authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of its common stock.  TCA has agreed to refrain from holding an amount of shares which would result in TCA or its affiliates from owning more than 9.99% of the then-outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock at any one time.


We will bear the expenses of this offering which we estimate to be approximately $40,000, including legal expenses of approximately $25,000, accounting expenses of approximately $10,000, and miscellaneous expenses, including printer costs, of approximately $5,000.




There are nowsubstantial risks to investors as a result of the issuance of shares of our common stock under the Equity Agreement.  These risks include dilution of stockholders, significant decline in our stock price and our inability to draw sufficient funds when needed.


TCA will periodically purchase our common stock under the Equity Agreement and will, in turn, sell such shares to investors in the businessmarket at the market price.  This may cause our stock price to decline, which will require us to issue increasing numbers of designing and manufacturing upscale jewelry. We relocatedcommon shares to TCA to raise the same amount of funds, as our principal executive offices to 12 Daniel Road E. Fairfield, New Jersey 07004, and our telephone number is now (973) 227-3230.  We have also changed our name from Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc. to Bergio International, Inc., and have discontinued all prior business operations in favorstock price declines.


Summary of the business plan and operations of Diamond Information Institute,Shares offered by the acquired operations, which will be our only significant operations going forward.  Our website is located at  www.Bergio.com.

Selling Security Holder


Summary Financial Information
In the table below, we provide you with our summary financial data which represents the business of Diamond Information Institute, the company we have acquired and whose operations we have since assumed beginning October, 2009. This information is derived from our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period. When you read this historical selected financial data, it is important that you read it along with the historical financial statements and related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 Statement of Operations Data 
 Year Ended December 31, 2009  Year Ended December 31, 2008 
Sales- Net $975,354  $1,385,620 
Gross Profit  284,646   537,644 
Total Operating Expenses  789,417   1,631,287 
Net Loss  (597,725)  (1,106,856)
Net Loss Per Share  (0.01)  (0.02)


1



Balance Sheet Data Year Ended December 31, 2009  Year Ended December 31, 2008 
Current Assets $1,722,903  $2,079,321 
Current Liabilities  2,100,386   1,996,988 
Long-Term Liabilities  205,595   136,362 
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)  (417,771)  111,954 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)  $1,888,210  $2,245,304 



Securities Being

Common stock Offered by the Selling Security Holder

Up to 3,367,080

17,500,000 shares of common stock in Bergio International, Inc.stock.

Initial

Common Stock Outstanding Before the Offering Price

The selling shareholders will sell our shares at prices established on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board during the term

87,418,881as of this offering, at prices different than prevailing market prices or at privately negotiated prices.June 22, 2012

Common Stock Outstanding After the Offering

104,918,881 shares, assuming the sale of all of the shares being registered in this Registration Statement.

Terms of the Offering

The selling shareholdersSelling Security Holder will determine the terms relative to the sale ofwhen and how it will sell the common stock offered in this Prospectus.prospectus.

Termination of the Offering

The

Pursuant to the Equity Agreement, this offering will conclude when all of the 3,367,080 shares of common stock have been sold or at a time when the Company, in its sole discretion, decides to terminate twenty-four (24) months after the registration statement to which this prospectus is made a part is declared effective by the SEC.

Use of Proceeds

We will not receive any proceeds from the shares. 

Tangiers, as an underwriter, cannot avail itselfsale of the provisions of Rule 144 in order to resell the shares of common stock issued to itoffered by the Selling Security Holder.  However, we will receive proceeds from the sale of our common stock under the Securities PurchaseEquity Agreement.
 The proceeds from the offering will be used for working capital and general corporate purpose.  See “Use of Proceeds.”

Risk Factors

The securitiescommon stock offered hereby involveinvolves a high degree of risk and should not be purchased by investors who cannot afford the loss of their entire investment.  See “Risk Factors.”Factors” beginning on page 11.

Common Stock Issued Before Offering

OTCBB Symbol

84,109,288 shares of our common stock are issued and outstanding as of the date of this prospectus.

Common Stock Issued After Offering (1)
87,476,388 shares of common stock.
Use of ProceedsWe will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stock by the selling shareholders.
(1)Assumes the issuance to Tangiers of all shares being registered under the Securities Purchase Agreement.

BRGO.OB




2




9



SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA



RISK FACTORS

The shares of ourfollowing selected financial information is derived from the Company’s Financial Statements appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Financial Statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus.


STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS:  

For the years ended

December 31,

 

2011

 

 

2010

Revenues

$

1,621,011

 

 

$

1,445,570

Cost of Sales

(926,684)

(812,831)

Gross Profit

694,327

632,739

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

935,334

 

 

 

973,314

Operating income (loss)

 

(241,007)

 

 

 

(340,575)

Net income (loss)

$

(408,328)

 

 

$

(838,999)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share

$

(0.02)

 

 

$

(0.10)

Weighted average common shares outstanding basic and diluted

 

21,641,233

 

 

 

8,718,321


 

For the years ended

December 31,

BALANCE SHEETS:

2011

  

  

2010

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents                                                       

$

128,238

 

 

$

4,262

Current assets

$

2,183,826

 

 

$

2,265,507

Total assets

$

2,468,423

 

 

$

2,388,642

Current liabilities

$

1,214,369

 

 

$

1,240,384

Total liabilities

$

1,245,404

 

 

$

1,292,010

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

$

1,223,019

 

 

$

1,096,632


STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS:  

For the three months ended

March 31,

 

2012

 

 

2011

Revenues

$

329,947

 

 

$

270,551

Cost of Sales

(135,660)

(181,053)

Gross profit

194,287

89,498

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

226,738

 

 

 

248,423

Operating income (loss)

 

(32,451)

 

 

 

(158,925)

Net income (loss)

$

(221,669)

 

 

$

(177,830)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share

$

(0.00)

 

 

$

(0.02)

Weighted average common shares outstanding basic and diluted

 

48,989,242

 

 

 

11,773,586

 

For the three months ended

March 31,

 

 

For the year ended

December 31,

BALANCE SHEETS:

2012

  

  

2011

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents                                                                   

$

18,252

 

 

$

128,238

Current assets

$

2,145,333

 

 

$

2,183,826

Total assets

$

2,436,028

 

 

$

2,468,423

Current liabilities

$

1,249,208

 

 

$

1,214,369

Total liabilities

$

1,272,073

 

 

$

1,245,404

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

$

1,163,955

 

 

$

1,223,019


10



RISK FACTORS


An investment in the Company’s common stock being offered for resale by the selling security holder are highly speculative in nature, involveinvolves a high degree of risk and should be purchased only by persons who can afford to lose the entire amount invested in the common stock. Before purchasing any of the shares of common stock, yourisk.  You should carefully consider the following factors relatingrisks described below as well as other information provided to our business and prospects.you in this prospectus, including information in the section of this document entitled “Forward Looking Statements.”  If any of the following risks actually occurs,occur, our business, financial condition or operating results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case,affected, the trading pricevalue of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Risks related to


An investment in the Company’s common stock involves a high degree of risk.  An investor should carefully consider the risks described below as well as other information contained in this report.  If any of the following risks actually occur, our Securities Purchase Agreement

Existing stockholders will experience significant dilution from our salebusiness, financial condition or results of shares underoperations could be materially adversely affected, the Securities Purchase Agreement.
The sale of shares pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement will have a dilutive impact on our stockholders. As a result, the market pricevalue of our common stock could decline, significantly asand an investor may lose all or part of his or her investment.


Risks Related To Our Business and Industry


WE HAVE HAD LIMITED OPERATIONS, HAVE INCURRED LOSSES SINCE INCEPTION, HAVE SUFFICIENT CASH TO SUSTAIN OUR OPERATIONS FOR A PERIOD OF APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTH, AND WE NEED ADDITIONAL CAPITAL TO EXECUTE OUR BUSINESS PLAN.


For the three months ended March 31, 2012, we sell shares pursuant toincurred a net loss of $221,669 and used cash of $41,564 in operations.  As of March 31, 2012, we have an accumulated deficit of $3,566,117.  We will require additional funds through the Securities Purchase Agreement. In addition, for any particular advance, we will need to issue a greater numberreceipt of sharesconventional sources of common stock under the Securities Purchase Agreement as our stock price declines. If our stock price is lower, then our existing stockholders would experience greater dilution.

The investor under the Securities Purchase Agreement will pay less than the then-prevailing market price of our common stock.
The common stock to be issued under the Securities Purchase Agreement will be issued at 88% of the lowest daily volume weighted average pricecapital or through future sales of our common stock, duringuntil such time as our revenues are sufficient to meet our cost structure, and ultimately achieve profitable operations.  We currently have sufficient cash to sustain our operations for a period of approximately two months.  Management estimates that it will need approximately $200,000 over the five consecutive trading days immediately followingnext twelve months to fund all of the date we send an advance notice to the investorCompany’s current product development and marketing projects.  There is subject to further reduction provided in the Securities Purchase Agreement. These discounted sales could also cause the price of our common stock to decline. As a result, as the price of our common stock declinesno assurance we will be required to issue more shares to Tangierssuccessful in order to obtain the financing we require under the Securities Purchase Agreement. As Tangiers sellsraising additional capital or achieving profitable operations.  Wherever possible, our stock into the market the stock price may decrease due to additional shares in the market, which could allow Tangiers to receive even greater amountsboard of common stock, sales of which would furthe r depress our stock price.
The sale of our stock under the Securities Purchase Agreement could encourage short sales by third parties, which could contribute to the further decline of our stock price.
The significant downward pressure on the price of our common stock caused by the sale of material amounts of common stock under the Securities Purchase Agreement could encourage short sales by third parties. Such an event could place further downward pressure on the price of our common stock.
We may be limited in the amount we can raise under the Securities Purchase Agreement because of concerns about selling more shares into the market than the market can absorb without a significant price adjustment.
The Company intends to exert its best efforts to avoid a significant downward pressure on the price of its common stock by refraining from placing more shares into the market than the market can absorb. This potential adverse impact on the stock price may limit our willingnessdirectors will attempt to use non-cash consideration to satisfy obligations.  In many instances, we believe that the Securities Purchase Agreement. Until there is a greater trading volume, it seems unlikely that wenon-cash consideration will be able to access the maximum amount we can draw without an adverse impact on the stock price
We may not be able to access sufficient funds under the Securities Purchase Agreement when needed.
The commitment amountconsist of the Securities Purchase Agreement is $25,000,000. After estimated feesrestricted and offering costs, we will receive net proceeds of approximately $24,950,000. At our current share price of $0.038 per share we will sell our stock to Tangiers at 88% of the market price per share which equates to a share price of $0.0334.  If our current share price remains at $0.038 we will need to register  748,502,994unrestricted shares of our common stock in order to obtain the full $25,000,000 available to us under the Securities Purchase Agreement. The total amount of 3,367,080 shares of our common stock that we are registering under this registration statement will be issued to Tangiers in order to obtain the funds available to us under the Securities Purchase Agreement.  Which means we will be required to file another registra tion statement if we intend to obtain the full amount of funds available to us under the Securities Purchase Agreement. If we issue to Tangiers all 3,367,080 shares of our common stock we will register, we will only be able to receive approximately $62,460 in net proceeds after paying expenses related to this registration statement of approximately $50,000.

3


Our ability to raise funds under the Securities Purchase Agreement is also limited by a number of factors, including the fact that the maximum advance amount is capped at $250,000 as well as the fact that we are not permitted to submit any request for an advance within 10 trading days of a prior request. Also the Company may only draw an amount equal to the average daily trading volume in dollar amount during the 10 trading days preceding the advance date. As such, although sufficient funds are made available to the Company under the Securities Purchase Agreement, such funds may not be readily available when needed by the Company.

The Securities Purchase Agreement restricts our ability to engage in alternative financings.
The structure of transactions under the Securities Purchase Agreementstock.  These actions will result in the Company being deemed to be involved in a near continuous indirect primary public offering of our securities. As long as we are deemed to be engaged in a public offering, our ability to engage in a private placement will be limited because of integration concerns and therefore limits our ability to obtain additional funding if necessary. If we do not obtain the necessary funds required to maintain the operationsdilution of the businessownership interests of existing stockholders and to settle our liabilities on a timely manner, the business will inevitable suffer.
The Company must maintain a listing on the Over-The –Counter Bulletin Board to maintin its financing under the Securities Purchase Agreement.
If for any reason the Company is unable to maintain its listing on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board, then the Company will be unable to receive financing under the Securities Purchase Agreement. The lost of the listing would therefore meanmay further dilute common stock book value, and that the Company could not access the capital it would expect to receive from Tangiers under the Securities Purchase Agreement.
Wedilution may be unable to maintain enough shares to issue to Tangiers under the Securities Purchase Agreement.
At our current stock price of $0.038 we will need to issue Tangiers 748,502,994 shares in order to obtain the total amount of financing that is available to us under the Securities Purchase Agreement with Tangiers.  As our stock price decreases we will need to issue even more shares in order to obtain financing under the Securities Purchase Agreement. We are currently authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares, which means we will need to increase our authorized shares in order to obtain financing that we are entitled to under the Securities Purchase Agreement.  We will need to obtain shareholder approval to increase our authorized shares. If we do not obtain shareholder approval we could be prevented from obtaining the financing we need under the Securities Purchase Agreement.
material.


We will not be able to use the Securities Purchase Agreement if the shares to be issued in connection with an advance would result in Tangiers owning more than 9.9% of our outstanding common stock.
Under the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement, we may not request advances if the shares to be issued in connection with such advances would result in Tangiers and its affiliates owning more than 9.9% of our outstanding common stock. We are permitted under the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement to make limited draws on the Securities Purchase Agreement so long as Tangiers beneficial ownership of our common stock remains lower than 9.9%.

A possibility exists that Tangiers and its affiliates may own more than 9.9% of our outstanding common stock (whether through open market purchases, retention of shares issued under the Securities Purchase Agreement, or otherwise) at a time when we would otherwise plan to obtain an advance under the Securities Purchase Agreement.  As such, by operation of the provisions of the Secu rities Purchase Agreement, the Company may be prohibited from procuring additional funding when necessary due to these provisions discussed above.

The Securities Purchase Agreement will restrict our ability to engage in alternative financings.
The structure of transactions under the Securities Purchase Agreement will result in the Company being deemed to be involved in a near continuous indirect primary public offering of our securities. As long as we are deemed to be engaged in a public offering, our ability to engage in a private placement will be limited because of integration concerns and therefore limits our ability to obtain additional funding if necessary. If we do not obtain the necessary funds required to maintain the operations of the business and to settle our liabilities on a timely manner, the business will inevitable suffer.
DECLINE IN DISCRETIONARY CONSUMER SPENDING MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR INDUSTRY, OUR OPERATIONS, AND ULTIMATELY OUR PROFITABILITY.


4



Risks Related To Our Business
A decline in discretionary consumer spending may adversely affect our industry, our operations, and ultimately our profitability.

Luxury products, such as fine jewelry, are discretionary purchases for consumers.  Any reduction in consumer discretionary spending or disposable income may affect the jewelry industry more significantly than other industries.  Many economic factors outside of our control could affect consumer discretionary spending, including the financial markets, consumer credit availability, prevailing interest rates, energy costs, employment levels, salary levels, and tax rates.  Any reduction in discretionary consumer spending could materially adversely affect our business and financial condition.

Because we are highly dependent on our key executive officer for


OUR OPERATING RESULTS MAY BE ADVERSELY IMPACTED BY WORLDWIDE POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTIES AND SPECIFIC CONDITIONS IN THE MARKETS WE ADDRESS.


In the success of ourrecent past, general worldwide economic conditions have experienced a downturn due to slower economic activity, concerns about inflation, increased energy costs, decreased consumer confidence, reduced corporate profits and capital spending, and adverse business plan and may be dependent on the efforts and relationshipsconditions.  Any continuation or worsening of the principalscurrent global economic and financial conditions could materially adversely affect (i) our ability to raise, or the cost of, needed capital, (ii) demand for our current and future acquisitionsproducts and mergers, if(iii) our ability to commercialize products.  We cannot predict the timing, strength, or duration of any of these individuals become unable to continueeconomic slowdown or subsequent economic recovery, worldwide, or in their role, our business could be adversely affected.the display industry.





BECAUSE WE ARE HIGHLY DEPENDENT ON OUR KEY EXECUTIVE OFFICER FOR THE SUCCESS OF OUR BUSINESS PLAN AND MAY BE DEPENDENT ON THE EFFORTS AND RELATIONSHIPS OF THE PRINCIPALS OF FUTURE ACQUISITIONS AND MERGERS, IF ANY OF THESE INDIVIDUALS BECOME UNABLE TO CONTINUE IN THEIR ROLE, OUR BUSINESS COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED.


We believe our success will depend, to a significant extent, on the efforts and abilities of Berge Abajian, our CEO.Chief Executive Officer.  If we lost Mr. Abajian, we would be forced to expend significant time and money in the pursuit of a replacement, which would result in both a delay in the implementation of our business plan and the diversion of limited working capital.  We can give you no assurance that we could find a satisfactory replacement for Mr. Abajian at all, or on terms that are not unduly expensive or burdensome.


If we grow and implement our business plan, we will need to add managerial talent to support our business plan.  There is no guarantee that we will be successful in adding such managerial talent.  These professionals are regularly recruited by other companies and may choose to change companies.  Given our relatively small size compared to some of our competitors, the performance of our business may be more adversely affected than our competitors would be if we lose well-performing employees and are unable to attract new ones.

Because we intend to acquire businesses and such activity involves a number of risks, our core business may suffer.


BECAUSE WE INTEND TO ACQUIRE BUSINESSES AND SUCH ACTIVITY INVOLVES A NUMBER OF RISKS, OUR CORE BUSINESS MAY SUFFER.


We may consider acquisitions of assets or other business.  Any acquisition involves a number of risks that could fail to meet our expectations and adversely affect our profitability.  For example:

§  The acquired assets or business may not achieve expected results;


§  We may incur substantial, unanticipated costs, delays or other operational or financial problems when integrating the acquired assets;

·

The acquired assets or business may not achieve expected results;


§  We may not be able to retain key personnel of an acquired business;

·

We may incur substantial, unanticipated costs, delays or other operational or financial problems when integrating the acquired assets;


§  Our management’s attention may be diverted; or

·

We may not be able to retain key personnel of an acquired business;


§  Our management may not be able to manage the acquired assets or combined entity effectively or to make acquisitions and grow our business internally at the same time.

·

Our managements attention may be diverted; or


·

Our management may not be able to manage the acquired assets or combined entity effectively or to make acquisitions and grow our business internally at the same time.


If these problems arise we may not realize the expected benefits of an acquisition.

Because the jewelry industry in general is affected by fluctuations in the prices of precious metals and precious and semi-precious stones, we could experience increased operating costs that will affect our bottom line.


BECAUSE THE JEWELRY INDUSTRY IN GENERAL IS AFFECTED BY FLUCTUATIONS IN THE PRICES OF PRECIOUS METALS AND PRECIOUS AND SEMI-PRECIOUS STONES, WE COULD EXPERIENCE INCREASED OPERATING COSTS THAT WILL AFFECT OUR BOTTOM LINE.


The availability and prices of gold, diamonds, and other precious metals and precious and semi-precious stones may be influenced by cartels, political instability in exporting countries and inflation.  Shortages of these materials or sharp changes in their prices could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.  A significant change in prices of key commodities, including gold, could adversely affect our business or reduce operating margins and impact consumer demand if retail prices increased significantly, even though we historically incorporate any increases in the purchase of raw materials to our consumers.  Additionally, a significant disruption in our supply of gold or other commodities could decrease the production and shipping levels of our products, which may materially increase our operating costs and ultimately affect our profit margins.






BECAUSE WE DEPEND ON OUR ABILITY TO IDENTIFY AND RESPOND TO FASHION TRENDS, IF WE MISJUDGE THESE TRENDS, OUR ABILITY TO MAINTAIN AND GAIN MARKET SHARE WILL BE EFFECTED.


5


Because we depend on our ability to identify and respond to fashion trends, if we misjudge these trends, our ability to maintain and gain market share will be effected.

The jewelry industry is subject to rapidly changing fashion trends and shifting consumer demands.  Accordingly, our success may depend on the priority that our target customers place on fashion and our ability to anticipate, identify, and capitalize upon emerging fashion trends.  If we misjudgesmisjudge fashion trends or are unable to adjust our products in a timely manner, our net sales may decline or fail to meet expectations and any excess inventory may be sold at lower prices.

Our ability to maintain or increase our revenues could be harmed if we are unable to strengthen and maintain our brand image.


OUR ABILITY TO MAINTAIN OR INCREASE OUR REVENUES COULD BE HARMED IF WE ARE UNABLE TO STRENGTHEN AND MAINTAIN OUR BRAND IMAGE.


We have spent significant amounts of time and money in branding our Bergio and Bergio Bridal lines.  We believe that primary factors in determining customer buying decisions, especially in the jewelry industry, are determined by price, confidence in the merchandise and quality associated with a brand.  The ability to differentiate products from competitors of the Company has been a factor in attracting consumers.  However, if the Company’s ability to promote its brand fails to garner brand recognition, its ability to generate revenues may suffer.  If the Company fails to differentiate its products, its ability to sell its products wholesale will be adversely affected.  These factors could result in lower selling prices and sales volumes, which could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.

We maintain a relatively large inventory


IF WE WERE TO EXPERIENCE SUBSTANTIAL DEFAULTS BY OUR CUSTOMERS ON ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, THIS COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR LIQUIDITY AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.


As of our raw materials and if this inventory is lost due to theft, our results of operations would be negatively impacted.

We purchase large volumes of precious metals and store significant quantities of raw materials and jewelry products at our facility in New Jersey.  Although we have an insurance policy with Lloyd’s of London, if we were to encounter significant inventory losses due to third party or employee theft from our facility which required us to implement additional security measures, this would increase our operating costs.  Also such losses of inventory could exceed the limits of, or be subject to an exclusion from, coverage under our current insurance policy.  Claims filed by us under our insurance policies could lead to increases in the insurance premiums payable by us or possible termination of coverage under the relevant policy.
If we were to experience substantial defaults by our customers on accounts receivable, this could have a material adverse affect on our liquidity and results of operations.
Approximately $342,000March 31, 2012, approximately $384,000 of our working capital consists of accounts receivable from customers.  If customers responsible for a large amount of accounts receivable were to become insolvent or otherwise unable to pay for our products, or to make payments in a timely manner, our liquidity and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.  An economic or industry downturn could materially affect the ability to collect these accounts receivable, which could then result in longer payment cycles, increased collections costs and defaults in excess of management’s expectations.  A significant deterioration in the ability to collect on accounts receivable could affect our cash flow and working capital position.
We May Not Be Able To Increase Sales Or Otherwise Successfully Operate Our Business, Which Could Have


WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO INCREASE SALES OR OTHERWISE SUCCESSFULLY OPERATE OUR BUSINESS, WHICH COULD HAVE A Significant Negative Impact On Our Financial Condition.

SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION.


We believe that the key to our success is to increase our revenues and available cash.  We may not have the resources required to promote our business and its potential benefits.  If we are unable to gain market acceptance of our business, we will not be able to generate enough revenue to achieve and maintain profitability or to continue our operations.


We may not be able to increase our sales or effectively operate our business.  To the extent we are unable to achieve sales growth, we may continue to incur losses.  We may not be successful or make progress in the growth and operation of our business.  Our current and future expense levels are based on operating plans and estimates of future sales and revenues and are subject to increase as strategies are implemented.  Even if our sales grow, we may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall.


Further, if we substantially increase our operating expenses to increase sales and marketing, and such expenses are not subsequently followed by increased revenues, our operating performance and results would be adversely affected and, if sustained, could have a material adverse effect on our business.  To the extent we implement cost reduction efforts to align our costs with revenue, our sales could be adversely affected.


6




We May Be Unable To Manage Growth, Which May Impact Our Potential Profitability.

WE MAY BE UNABLE TO MANAGE GROWTH, WHICH MAY IMPACT OUR POTENTIAL PROFITABILITY.


Successful implementation of our business strategy requires us to manage our growth.  Growth could place an increasing strain on our management and financial resources.  To manage growth effectively, we will need to:

•*Establish definitive business strategies, goals and objectives
•*Maintain a system of management controls
•*Attract and retain qualified personnel, as well as, develop, train and manage management-level and other employees


·

Establish definitive business strategies, goals and objectives;


·

Maintain a system of management controls; and


·

Attract and retain qualified personnel, as well as, develop, train and manage management-level and other employees.


If we fail to manage our growth effectively, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed, and our stock price may decline.

If we fail


Risks Related to remain current on our reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board which would limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

Our Common Stock


IF WE FAIL TO REMAIN CURRENT ON OUR REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, WE COULD BE REMOVED FROM THE OTCBB WHICH WOULD LIMIT THE ABILITY OF BROKER-DEALERS TO SELL OUR SECURITIES AND THE ABILITY OF STOCKHOLDERS TO SELL THEIR SECURITIES IN THE SECONDARY MARKET.


Companies trading on the OTC Bulletin Board,OTCBB, such as us, must be reporting issuers under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and must be current in their reports under Section 13, in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTC Bulletin Board.OTCBB.  More specifically, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has enacted Rule 6530, which determines eligibility of issuers quoted on the OTC Bulletin BoardOTCBB by requiring an issuer to be current in its filings with the Commission.SEC.  Pursuant to Rule 6530(e), if we file our reports late with the CommissionSEC three times our securities will be removed from the OTC Bulletin BoardOTCBB for failure to timely file.  As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be severely adversely affected by limiting the ab ilityability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

Our common stock is considered a “penny stock,


OUR COMMON STOCK IS CONSIDERED A “PENNY STOCK,and is subject to additional sale and trading regulations that may make it more difficult to sell.

AND IS SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL SALE AND TRADING REGULATIONS THAT MAY MAKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO SELL.


Our common stock is considered to be a “penny stock” since it does not qualify for one of the exemptions from the definition of “penny stock” under Section 3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act for 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.  Our common stock is a “penny stock” because it meets one or more of the following conditions (i) the stock trades at a price less than $5.00 per share; (ii) it is NOTnot traded on a “recognized” national exchange; (iii) it is NOTnot quoted on the Nasdaq Stock Market, or even if so, has a price less than $5.00 per share; or (iv) is issued by a company that has been in business less than three years with net tangible assets less than $5 million.


The principal result or effect of being designated a “penny stock” is that securities broker-dealers participating in sales of our common stock will be subject to the “penny stock” regulations set forth in Rules 15-2 through 15g-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act.  For example, Rule 15g-2 requires broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written receipt of the document at least two business days before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor'sinvestor’s account.  Moreover, Rule 15g-9 requires broker-dealers in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor for transactions in such stocks before selling any penny stock to that investor.  This procedure requires the broker-dealer t oto (i) obtain from the investor information concerning his or her financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably determine, based on that information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor and that the investor has sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide the investor with a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker-dealer made the determination in (ii) above; and (iv) receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming that it accurately reflects



14



the investor's financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives.  Compliance with these requirements may make it more difficult and time consuming for holders of our common stock to resell their shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of them in the market or otherwise.


7

BECAUSE OUR CURRENT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND SOLE DIRECTOR, MR. BERGE ABAJIAN, OWNS A SIGNIFICANT PERCENTAGE OF OUR COMPANY, HE WILL BE ABLE TO EXERCISE SIGNIFICANT INFLUENCE OVER OUR COMPANY, DESPITE YOUR ABILITY TO VOTE.



Because our current chief executive officer and sole director, Mr. Berge Abajian, owns a significant percentage of our company, he will be able to exercise significant influence over our company, despite your ability to vote.

Berge Abajian, our chief executive officer and sole director, beneficially owns a majoritysignificant percentage of our common stock and maintains voting control through his ownership of preferred stock.  Accordingly, Mr. Abajian will be able to determine the composition of our board of directors, will retain the effective voting power to approve all matters requiring shareholder approval, will prevail in matters requiring shareholder approval, including, in particular the election and removal of directors, and will continue to have significant influence over our business.  As a result of his ownership and position in the Company, Mr. Abajian is able to influence all matters requiring shareholder action, including significant corporate transactions.  In addition, sales of significant amount of shares held by Mr. Abajian, or the prospect of these sales, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.


Tangiers

THE MARKET PRICE FOR OUR COMMON SHARES IS PARTICULARLY VOLATILE GIVEN OUR STATUS AS A RELATIVELY UNKNOWN COMPANY WITH A SMALL AND THINLY TRADED PUBLIC FLOAT, LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY AND LACK OF PROFITS WHICH COULD LEAD TO WIDE FLUCTUATIONS IN OUR SHARE PRICE. YOU MAY BE UNABLE TO SELL YOUR COMMON SHARES AT OR ABOVE YOUR PURCHASE PRICE, WHICH MAY RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL LOSSES TO YOU.


The market for our common shares is characterized by significant price volatility when compared to the shares of larger, more established companies that trade on a national securities exchange and have large public floats, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than the shares of such larger, more established companies for the indefinite future.  The volatility in our share price is attributable to a number of factors.  First, as noted above, our common shares are, compared to the shares of such larger, more established companies, sporadically and thinly traded.  As a consequence of this limited liquidity, the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by our shareholders may disproportionately influence the price of those shares in either direction.  The price for our shares could, own a majority of our sharesfor example, decline precipitously in the event we waive certain provisions of the Securities Purchase Agreement.

Under the Securities Purchase Agreement Tangiers is limited to owning no more than 9.9%that a large number of our common stock at any point in time. However,shares are sold on the market without commensurate demand.  Secondly, we are a speculative or “risky” investment due to our limited operating history and lack of profits to date, and uncertainty of future market acceptance for our potential products.  As a consequence of this enhanced risk, more risk-adverse investors may, under the fear of losing all or most of their investment in the event we waived this provision in orderof negative news or lack of progress, be more inclined to obtain additional financing, Tangiers could end up owningsell their shares on the market more quickly and at greater discounts than would be the case with the stock of a majoritylarger, more established company that trades on a national securities exchange and has a large public float.  Many of these factors are beyond our control and may decrease the market price of our company basedcommon shares, regardless of our operating performance.  We cannot make any predictions or projections as to what the prevailing market price for our common shares will be at any time, including as to whether our common shares will sustain their current market prices, or as to what effect that the sale of shares or the availability of common shares for sale at any time will have on the prevailing market price.


WE WILL INCUR INCREASED COSTS AS A RESULT OF BEING A PUBLIC COMPANY, WHICH COULD AFFECT OUR PROFITABILITY AND OPERATING RESULTS.


We voluntarily file annual, quarterly and current stock pricereports with the SEC.  In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) and the maximum numberrules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board have imposed various requirements on public companies, including requiring changes in corporate governance practices.  We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities of shares were issued underours more time-consuming and costly.  We expect to spend between $50,000 and $100,000 in legal and accounting expenses annually to comply with our SEC reporting obligations and Sarbanes-Oxley.  These costs could affect profitability and our results of operations.





WE HAVE NOT PAID DIVIDENDS IN THE PAST AND DO NOT EXPECT TO PAY DIVIDENDS FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.  ANY RETURN ON INVESTMENT MAY BE LIMITED TO THE VALUE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.


No cash dividends have been paid on the Securities Purchase AgreementCompany’s common stock.  We expect that any income received from operations will be devoted to provide usour future operations and growth.  The Company does not expect to pay cash dividends in the financing we are allowed.


Tradingnear future.  Payment of dividends would depend upon our profitability at the time, cash available for those dividends, and other factors as the Company’s board of directors may consider relevant.  If the Company does not pay dividends, the Company’s common stock may be restricted byless valuable because a return on an investor’s investment will only occur if the Securities Exchange Commission’s pennyCompany’s stock regulations, which may limitprice appreciates.


IF WE FAIL TO IMPLEMENT AND MAINTAIN AN EFFECTIVE SYSTEM OF INTERNAL CONTROLS, WE MAY BE UNABLE TO ACCURATELY REPORT OUR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OR PREVENT FRAUD, AND INVESTOR CONFIDENCE AND THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK MAY BE MATERIALLY AND ADVERSELY AFFECTED.


As a stockholder’s abilitypublic company in the United States, we are subject to buy and sell our stock.

the reporting obligations under the U.S. securities laws. The Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has adopted regulationsrules requiring every public company to include a report of management on the effectiveness of such company’s internal control over financial reporting in its annual report.   Our management has performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, and reported to our board of directors the material weaknesses as of December 31, 2011.  The material weaknesses identified in our internal control over financial reporting are related to insufficient personnel with appropriate levels of accounting knowledge and experience to address the high volume of U.S. GAAP accounting issues and to prepare and review financial statements and related disclosures under U.S. GAAP.  We may require more resources and incur more costs than currently expected to remediate our identified material weaknesses or any additional significant deficiencies or material weaknesses that may be identified, which generally define “penny stock”may adversely affect our results of operations.  If either of the material weaknesses is not remedied or recurs, or if we identify additional weaknesses or fail to timely and successfully implement new or improved controls, our ability to assure timely and accurate financial reporting may be adversely affected, and we could suffer a loss of investor confidence in the reliability of our financial statements, which in turn could negatively impact the trading price of our common stock.


WE ARE REGISTERING AN AGGREGATE OF 17,500,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK TO BE ISSUED UNDER THE EQUITY AGREEMENT.  THE SALE OF SUCH SHARES COULD DEPRESS THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.


We are registering an aggregate of 17,500,000 Shares of common stock under the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part for issuance pursuant to the Equity Agreement.  Notwithstanding TCA’s ownership limitation, the 17,500,000 Shares would represent approximately 16.68% of our shares of common stock outstanding immediately after our exercise of the put right under the Equity Agreement.  The sale of these Shares into the public market by TCA could depress the market price of our common stock.  At the assumed offering price of $0.00342 per share, we will be able to receive up to $59,850 in gross proceeds, assuming the sale of the entire 17,500,000 Shares being registered hereunder pursuant to the Equity Agreement.  We would be required to register 713,494,152 additional shares to obtain the balance of $2,500,000 under the Equity Agreement at the assumed offering price of $0.00342.   Due to the floating offering price, we are not able to determine the exact number of shares that we will issue under the Equity Agreement.





THE COMPANY MAY NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THE FULL AMOUNT AVAILABLE UNDER THE EQUITY AGREEMENT.


We have not drawn down funds and have not issued shares of our common stock under the Equity Agreement with TCA.  Our ability to draw down funds and sell shares under the Equity Agreement requires that the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part, be declared effective by the SEC, and that this registration statement continue to be effective.  In addition, the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part registers 17,500,000 Shares issuable under the Equity Agreement, and our ability to access the Equity Agreement to sell any remaining shares issuable under the Equity Agreement is subject to our ability to prepare and file one or more additional registration statements registering the resale of these shares.  These subsequent registration statements may be subject to review and comment by the staff of the SEC, and will require the consent of our independent registered public accounting firm.  Therefore, the timing of effectiveness of these subsequent registration statements cannot be assured.  The effectiveness of these subsequent registration statements is a condition precedent to our ability to sell the shares of common stock subject to these subsequent registration statements to TCA under the Equity Agreement.  Even if we are successful in causing one or more registration statements registering the resale of some or all of the shares issuable under the Equity Agreement to be declared effective by the SEC in a timely manner, we will not be able to sell shares under the Equity Agreement unless certain other conditions are met.  Accordingly, because our ability to draw down amounts under the Equity Agreement is subject to a number of conditions, there is no guarantee that we will be able to draw down any portion or all of the $2,500,000 available to us under the Equity Agreement.


IF WE ARE UNABLE TO MAINTAIN THE COMPANY’S LISTING OF ITS COMMON STOCK ON THE OTCBB, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ISSUE SHARES UNDER THE EQUITY AGREEMENT.


If we are not able to maintain the Company’s quotation of its common stock on the OTCBB, we may not be able to issue shares to TCA under the Equity Agreement.  Certain failures on the Company’s part to maintain its quotation on the OTCBB, such as the failure to file periodic reports with the SEC or the failure to have a market maker, will cause the OTCBB to drop the Company and the Company’s common stock would then be quoted on the Pink Sheets.  Currently, the SEC will not grant effectiveness to registration statements registering shares underlying equity securitylines where such company is quoted on the Pink Sheets.  If we fail to maintain our OTCBB listing, we may not be able to issue shares under the equity line and would be forced to seek other alternatives for capital raising.


CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS ON THE EXTENT OF PUTS AND THE DELIVERY OF ADVANCE NOTICES MAY HAVE LITTLE, IF ANY, EFFECT ON THE ADVERSE IMPACT OF OUR ISSUANCE OF SHARES IN CONNECTION WITH THE EQUITY AGREEMENT, AND AS SUCH, TCA MAY SELL A LARGE NUMBER OF SHARES, RESULTING IN SUBSTANTIAL DILUTION TO THE VALUE OF SHARES HELD BY EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS.


TCA has agreed to refrain from holding an amount of shares which would result in TCA or its affiliates owning more than 9.99% of the then-outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock at any one time.  These restrictions, however, do not prevent TCA from selling shares of common stock received in connection with a put, and then receiving additional shares of common stock in connection with a subsequent put shortly thereafter.  In this way, TCA could sell more than 9.99% of the outstanding common stock in a relatively short time frame while never holding more than 9.99% at one time.


ASSUMING WE UTILIZE THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT AVAILABLE UNDER THE EQUITY LINE OF CREDIT, EXISTING SHAREHOLDERS COULD EXPERIENCE SUBSTANTIAL DILUTION UPON THE ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK.


Our Equity Agreement with TCA contemplates the potential future issuance and sale of up to $2,500,000 of our common stock to TCA subject to the terms of the Equity Agreement.  The following table is an example of the number of shares that hascould be issued at various prices assuming we utilize the maximum amount remaining available under the Equity Agreement.   These examples assume issuances at a market price (as defined) less than $5.00of $0.00342 per share and at 10%, 25%, 50%, and 75% below $0.00342 per share, taking into account TCA’s 5% discount.


The following table should be read in conjunction with the footnotes immediately following the table.


Percent below

Current

market price

 

 

Price per

share (1)

 

 

Number of

shares issuable (2)

 

 

Shares

outstanding (3)

 

 

Percent of

outstanding shares (4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

%

 

$

0.003078

 

 

 

812,215,724

 

 

 

899,634,605

 

 

 

90.28

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

25

%

 

$

0.002565

 

 

 

974,658,869

 

 

 

1,062,077,750

 

 

 

91.77

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50

%

 

$

0.00171

 

 

 

1,461,988,304

 

 

 

1,549,407,185

 

 

 

94.36

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75

%

 

$

0.000855

 

 

 

2,923,976,608

 

 

 

3,011,395,489

 

 

 

97.10

%

(1)

Represents purchase prices equal to 95% of $0.0036 and potential reductions thereof of 10%, 25%, 50% and 75%.


(2)

Represents the number of shares issuable if the entire $2,500,000 under the Equity Agreement were drawn down at the indicated purchase prices.  Our Articles of Incorporation currently authorizes 200,000,000 shares of common stock.  We may need to amend our Articles of Incorporation in the future to increase the authorized number of common shares.


(3)

Based on 87,418,881shares of common stock outstanding at June 22, 2012.   Our Articles of Incorporation currently authorizes 200,000,000 shares of common stock. We may need to amend our Articles of Incorporation in the future to increase the authorized number of common shares.


(4)

Percentage of the total outstanding shares of common stock after the issuance of the shares indicated, without considering any contractual restriction on the number of shares the selling shareholder may own at any point in time or other restrictions on the number of shares we may issue.


TCA WILL PAY LESS THAN THE THEN-PREVAILING MARKET PRICE FOR OUR COMMON STOCK.


The common stock to be issued to TCA pursuant to the Equity Agreement will be purchased at an exercise5% discount to the average of the lowest closing price of less than $5.00 per share, subjectthe common stock of any two trading days, consecutive or inconsecutive, during the five consecutive trading days immediately following the date of our advance notice to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered byTCA of our election to put shares pursuant to the pennyEquity Agreement.  TCA has a financial incentive to sell our common stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sellimmediately upon receiving the shares to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”. The term “accredited investor” refers generallyrealize the profit equal to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared bydifference between the Securities and Exchange Commission, which provides information about penny stocksdiscounted price and the nature and level of risks inmarket price.  If TCA sells the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provideshares, the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketabilityprice of our common stock.

stock could decrease.  If our stock price decreases, TCA may have a further incentive to sell the shares of our common stock that it holds.  These sales may have a further impact on our stock price.


YOUR OWNERSHIP INTEREST MAY BE DILUTED AND THE VALUE OF OUR COMMON STOCK MAY DECLINE BY EXERCISING THE PUT RIGHT PURSUANT TO OUR EQUITY AGREEMENT.


Effective December 23, 2011, we entered into a $2,500,000 Equity Agreement with TCA.  Pursuant to the Equity Agreement, when we deem it necessary, we may raise capital through the private sale of our common stock to TCA at a price equal to ninety-five percent (95%) of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the five trading days immediately following the date our advance notice is delivered.  Because the put price is lower than the prevailing market price of our common stock, to the extent that the put right is exercised, your ownership interest may be diluted.




FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


8


FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference

Statements in this prospectus contain certain forward-lookingmay be “forward-looking statements.”  Forward-looking statements andinclude, but are not limited to, statements that express our intentions, beliefs, expectations, strategies, predictions or any other statements relating to our future activities or other future events or conditions.  These statements are based on the beliefs ofcurrent expectations, estimates and projections about our management as well asbusiness based, in part, on assumptions made by management.  These statements are not guarantees of future performance and information currently available to our management. Statementsinvolve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are not based on historical facts, which can be identified bydifficult to predict.  Therefore, actual outcomes and results may, and are likely to, differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in the use of such words as “likely,” “will,” “suggests,” “target,” “may,” “would,” “could,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “predict,” and similar expressions and their variants, are forward-looking. Suchforward-looking statements reflect our judgment as of the date of this prospectus and they involve many risks and uncertainties,due to numerous factors, including those described above and those risks discussed from time to time in this prospectus, including the risks described under the captions “Risk Factors”Factors,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” TheseOperations” in this prospectus and in other documents which we file with the SEC.  In addition, such statements could be affected by risks and uncertainties could cause actual resultsrelated to differ materially fromour ability to raise any financing which we may require for our operations, competition, government regulations and requirements, pricing and development difficulties, our ability to make acquisitions and successfully integrate those predicted in any forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in theacquisitions with our business, as well as general industry and market conditions and growth rates, and general economic conditions.  Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are reasonable,made, and we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nordo not undertake any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

THE OFFERING
This offering relatesstatement to reflect events or circumstances after the saledate of our common stock bythis prospectus, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.


USE OF PROCEEDS


The Selling Security Holder is selling stockholders, who intend to sell up to 3,367,080all of the shares of our common stock which are subjectcovered by this prospectus for its own account.  Accordingly, we will not receive any proceeds from the resale of our common stock.  However, we will receive proceeds from any sale of the common stock to issuanceTCA under the Securities PurchaseEquity Agreement.  We intend to use the net proceeds received for working capital or general corporate needs.


SELLING SECURITY HOLDERS


We agreed to register for resale  17,500,000 Shares that we will put to TCA pursuant to the Equity Agreement.  The Equity Agreement dated November 16, 2009.with TCA provides that TCA is committed to purchase up to $2,500,000 of our common stock.  We may draw on the facility from time to time, as and when we determine appropriate in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Equity Agreement.


Selling Security Holder Pursuant to the Securities PurchaseEquity Agreement


TCA is the Company may, at its discretion, periodically sell to Tangiers sharespotential purchaser of itsour common stock for a totalunder the Equity Agreement.  The  17,500,000 Shares offered in this prospectus are based on the Equity Agreement between TCA and us.  TCA may from time to time offer and sell any or all of the Shares that are registered under this prospectus.  The purchase price of up to $25,000,000. For each share of common stock purchased under the Securities Purchase Agreement, Tangiers will pay  us 88%is ninety-five percent (95%) of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of the Company'sCompany’s common stock as quoted by Bloomberg, LP on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board or other principal market on which the Company's common stock is traded for the five trading days immediately following the date on which the Company is deemed to provide an advance notice date. The price paidunder the Equity Agreement.


We are unable to determine the exact number of Shares that will actually be sold by Tangiers for TCA according to this prospectus due to:


·

the Company's stock shall be determined asability of TCA to determine when and whether it will sell any of the dateShares under this prospectus; and


·

the uncertainty as to the number of each individual request forShares that will be issued upon exercise of our put options through the delivery of an advanceAdvance notice under the Securities PurchaseEquity Agreement. Tangiers’ obligation


The following information contains a description of how TCA acquired (or shall acquire) the shares to purchase sharesbe sold in this offering.  TCA has not held a position or office, or had any other material relationship with us, except as follows.




TCA is a limited partnership organized and existing under the laws of the Company'sCayman Islands.  All investment decisions of, and control of, TCA is held by its general partner TCA Global Credit Fund GP, Ltd (“TCA GP”).  Robert Press is the manager of TCA GP, and he has voting and investment power over the shares beneficially owned by TCA.  TCA acquired, or will acquire, all shares being registered in this offering in the financing transaction with us.


TCA intends to sell up to  17,500,000 Shares of our common stock pursuant to the Equity Agreement under the Securities Purchase Agreement is subject to certain conditions, includingthis prospectus.  On December 23, 2011, the Company obtaining anand TCA entered into the Equity Agreement pursuant to which we have the opportunity, for a twenty-four (24) month period, beginning on the date on which the SEC first declares effective this registration statement forregistering the resale of our shares of the Company's common stock sold under the Securities Purchase Agreement and is limitedby TCA, to $250,000 per ten consecutive trading days after the advance notice is provided to Tangiers. The Securities Purchase Agreement shall terminate and Tangiers shall have no further obligation to make advances under the Securities Purchase Agreement at the earlier of the passing of 24 months after the date that the Securities and Exchange Commission declares the Company’s registration statement effective or the Company receives advances from Tangiers equal to the $25,000,000. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement , Tangiers received 1 ,111,111sell shares of our common stock asfor a one-time commitment fee equal to $500,000total price of $2,500,000.  For each share of our common stock purchased under the Equity Agreement, TCA will pay ninety-five percent (95%) of the Company's common stock divided by the lowest daily volume weighted average price of the Company'sCompany’s common stock duringfor the 30five trading days immediately following the date on which the Company is deemed to provide an advance notice of a sale of common stock under the Equity Agreement.


We relied on an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities PurchaseAct.  The transaction does not does involve a private offering, TCA is an “accredited investor” and/or qualified institutional buyer and TCA has access to information about the Company and its investment.


At an assumed purchase price under the Equity Agreement as quoted by Bloomberg, LP.

The commitment amountof $0.00342 (equal to 95% of the Securities Purchase Agreement is $25,000,000. After estimated fees and offering costs, we will receive net proceeds of approximately $24,950,000 provided we are able to continue to maintain a sufficient number of shares authorized for issuance under the Securities Purchase Agreement and are able to register those shares for issuance to Tangiers. We will be required to file another registration statement if we intend to obtain the full amount of funds available to us under the Securities Purchase Agreement. If we issue to Tangiers all 3,367,080 shares of our common stock we will only be able to receive approximately $62,460 in net proceeds after paying expenses related to this registration statement of approximately $50,000.
Tangiers intends to sell any shares purchased under the Securities Purchase Agreement at the then prevailing market price. These sales of our common stock in the public market could lower the market price of our common stock. In the event that the marketclosing price of our common stock decreases,of $0.0036 on June 21, 2012), we would notwill be able to draw downreceive up to $59,850 in gross proceeds, assuming the remaining balance available under the Securities Purchase Agreement with the number of shares being registered in the accompanying registration statement.
Under the termssale of the Securities Purchase Agreement, Tangiers is prohibited from engaging in short sales of our stock. Short selling is the act of borrowing a security from a broker and selling it, with the understanding that it must later be bought back (hopefully at a lower price) and returned to the broker. Short selling is a technique used by investors who try to profit from the falling price of a stock. Among other things, this Prospectus relates to the sharesentire 17,500,000 Shares of our common stock being registered hereunder pursuant to be issuedthe Equity Agreement.  At an assumed purchase price of $0.00342 under the Securities PurchaseEquity Agreement, we would be required to register 713,949,152 additional shares to obtain the balance of $2,500,000 under the Equity Agreement.


There are substantial risks to investors as a result of the issuance of shares of our common stock under the Securities PurchaseEquity Agreement.  These risks include dilution of our shareholders,stockholders and significant declinesdecline in our stock price and our inability to draw sufficient funds when needed.

price.


9


There is an inverse relationship between our stock price and the number of shares to be issued under the Securities Purchase Agreement. That is, as our stock price declines, we would be required to issue a greater number of shares under the Securities Purchase Agreement for a given advance.

USE OF PROCEEDS
This Prospectus relates to

TCA will periodically purchase shares of our common stock thatunder the Equity Agreement and will in turn, sell such shares to investors in the market at the prevailing market price.  This may cause our stock price to decline, which will require us to issue increasing numbers of shares to TCA to raise the same amount of funds, as our stock price declines.


TCA and any participating broker-dealers are “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act.  All expenses incurred with respect to the registration of the common stock will be offered and sold from timeborne by us, but we will not be obligated to timepay any underwriting fees, discounts, commission or other expenses incurred by the selling stockholders. There will be no proceeds to us fromSelling Security Holder in connection with the sale of sharessuch shares.


Except as indicated below, neither the Selling Security Holder nor any of our common stockits associates or affiliates has held any position, office, or other material relationship with us in this offering. the past three years.


The selling stockholders will receive all such proceeds.

However, we will receive proceeds fromfollowing table sets forth the sale of shares of our common stock to Tangiers under the Securities Purchase Agreement. Tangiers will purchase our shares of common stock under the Securities Purchase Agreement at a 12% discount to the current market price. The purchase pricename of the shares purchased underSelling Security Holder, the Securities Purchase Agreement will be equal to 88% of the volume weighted average price of our common stock on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board for the five (5) consecutive trading days immediately following the notice date.
Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, we cannot draw more than $250,000 every 10 trading days.
For illustrative purposes only, we have set forth below our intended use of proceeds for the range of net proceeds indicated below to be received under the Securities Purchase Agreement. The table assumes estimated offering expenses of $50,000. The figures below are estimates only, and may be changed due to various factors, including the timing of the receipt of the proceeds.
Gross proceeds: $112,460  $10,000,000  $15,000,000  $25,000,000 
Net proceeds: $62,460  $9,950,000  $14,950,000  $24,950,000 
Number of shares that would have to be issued under the Securities Purchase Agreement at an assumed offering price equal to $0.0334 (which is 88% of an assumed market price of $0.038)    3,367,080   299,401,198   499,101,796   748,502,994 
USE OF PROCEEDS                
General Working Capital $62,460  $9,950,000  $14,950,000  $24,950,000 
Total $62,460  $9,950,000  $14,950,000  $24,950,000 

The Securities Purchase Agreement allows us to use our proceeds for acquisitions, which includes any general business purpose that the Company deems appropriate, including acquisitions related to the Company’s business. We have chosen to pursue the Securities Purchase Agreement funding because it will make a large amount of cash available to us with the advantage of allowing us to decide when, and how much, we will draw from this financing. We will be in control of the draw down amounts and hope to be able to draw down from the Securities Purchase Agreement whenever the Company deems that such funds are needed. Our objective will be to draw down on the Securities Purchase Agreement funding during periods of positive results for us and during stages when our stock price is rising, in order to control and minimize, as much as possible , the potential dilution for our current and future stockholders. It may not be possible for us to always meet our objective; therefore, we will continue to identify alternative sources of financing, as we always have, including additional private placements of our stock.
DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE
The shares of our common stock are being offered for sale by the selling stockholders at prices established on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board during the term of this offering, at prices different than prevailing market prices or at privately negotiated prices.

10


At our current assumed market price of $0.0334 we will need to issue 748,502,994 shares in order to obtain the full $25,000,000 under the Securities Purchase Agreement.  The issuance of the 748,502,994 shares to Tangiers pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement will have a dilutive impact on our stockholders. For any particular advance, we will need to issue a greater number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by the Selling Security Holder as of the date hereof and the number of share of common stock being offered by the Selling Security Holder.  The shares being offered hereby are being registered to permit public secondary trading, and the Selling Security Holder may offer all or part of the shares for resale from time to time.  However, the Selling Security Holder is under no obligation to sell all or any portion of such shares nor is the Selling Security Holder obligated to sell any shares immediately upon effectiveness of this prospectus.  All information with respect to share ownership has been furnished by the Selling Security Holder.  The column entitled “Amount Beneficially Owned After the Offering” assumes the sale of all shares offered.


Name

 

Shares Beneficially Owned

Prior to Offering

 

Shares

to Be Offered

 

Amount Beneficially Owned

 After Offering (1)

 

Percent Beneficially

Owned After Offering

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (2)

 

1,736,111 (3)

 

17,500,000

 

1,736,111 (3)

 

1.65%





(1)

The number assumes the Selling Security Holder sells all of its shares being offering pursuant to this prospectus.


(2)

TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP is a limited partnership organized and existing under the Securities Purchase Agreement which would expose our existing stockholderslaws of the Cayman Islands.  TCA Global Credit Fund GP, Ltd. is the general partner of TCA and has voting and investment power over the shares beneficially owned by TCA.  Robert Press is the manager of TCA GP, and he has voting and investment power over the shares beneficially owned by TCA.


(3)

These shares represent the Facility Fee Shares issued to greater dilution.


SELLING SHAREHOLDERS
The following table presents information regarding the selling shareholders. A description of our relationshipTCA pursuant to the selling shareholders’ and howEquity Agreement.


The above table assumes that TCA purchases the selling shareholders acquired the shares to be soldmaximum amount of registrable Shares in this offering is detailed inregistration statement.


PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION


This prospectus relates to the information immediately following this table.

Selling
Stockholder
 
Shares
Beneficially
Owned before
Offering
  
Percentage of
Outstanding
Shares
Beneficially
Owned before
Offering (1)
  
Shares that
Could Be
Issued to Draw
Down Under
the Securities
Purchase
Agreement
  
Shares that
May Be (2)
Acquired
Under the
Securities
Purchase
Agreement
  
Percentage of
Outstanding
Shares Being
Registered to
Be Acquired Under the
Securities Purchase
Agreement (4)
  
Shares to Be
Sold in the
Offering
  
Percentage of
Outstanding
Shares
Beneficially
Owned after
Offering(3)
 
Tangiers  1,111,111   1.27%  3,367,080   748,502,994   30%  3,367,080   1.27%
Total  1,111,111   1.27%  3,367,080   748,502,994   30%  3,367,080   1.27%

——————— 
(1)  Applicable percentageresale of ownership is based on 84,109,288up to  17,500,000 Shares issued pursuant to the Equity Agreement held by the Selling Security Holder.


The Selling Security Holder and its successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or all of their shares of our common stock outstanding as of April 15, 2010. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes votingon any stock exchange, market or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such securities for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Note that affiliates are subject to Rule 144 and Insider trading regulations – percentage computation is for form purposes only.


(2)  Represents the number of shares of our common stock that would need to be issued to Tangiers at an assumed market price of $0.0334 to draw down the entire $25 million available under the Securities Purchase Agreement.

(3)  Applicable percentage of ownership is based on assumed 87,476,388 shares of our common stock outstanding after the offering due to the possible issuance of shares of common stock to Tangiers under the Securities Purchase Agreement.

(4)  The number of shares being registered equals 30% of the outstanding shares after deducting the shares held by affiliates of the Company.


11


Shares Acquired In Financing Transactions
Tangiers. Tangiers is the investor under the Securities Purchase Agreement. All investment decisions of, and control of, Tangiers are held by Robert Papiri and Michael Sobeck its managing partners. Tangiers Capital, LLC, makes the investment decisions on behalf of and controls Tangiers. Tangiers acquired all shares being registered in this offering in a financing transaction with us. This transaction is explained below:
Securities Purchase Agreement. On November 16, 2009 we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Tangiers. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement the Company may, at its discretion, periodically sell to Tangiers shares of its common stock for a total purchase price of up to $25,000,000. For each share of common stock purchased under the Securities Purchase Agreement, Tangiers will pay  us 88% of the lowest volume weighted average price of the Company's common stock as quoted by Bloomberg, LP on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board or other principal marketfacility on which the Company's common stock isshares are traded for the five days immediately following the notice date.or in private transactions.  The price paid by Tangiers for the Company's stock sha ll be determined as of the date of each individual request for an advance under the Securities Purchase Agreement. Tangiers’ obligation to purchase shares of the Company's common stock under the Securities Purchase Agreement is subject to certain conditions, including the Company obtaining an effective registration statement for shares of the Company's common stock sold under the Securities Purchase Agreement and is limited to $250,000 per ten consecutive trading days after the advance notice is provided to Tangiers. The Securities Purchase Agreement shall terminate and Tangiers shall have no further obligation to make advances under the Securities Purchase Agreement at the earlier of the passing of 24 months after the date that the Securities and Exchange Commission declares the Company’s registration statement effective or the Company receives advances from Tangiers equal to the $25,000,000. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, Tangiers will receive a one-time commitment fee equal to $500,000 of the Company's common stock divided by the lowest volume weighted average price of the Company's common stock during the 30 business days immediately following the date of the Securities Purchase Agreement, as quoted by Bloomberg, LP.

As of April 15, 2010 the shares of common stock to be issued in order to receive advances under the Securities Purchase Agreement upon issuance would equal approximately 30% of our outstanding common stock. 

There are certain risks related to sales by Tangiers, including:
•*The outstanding shares will be issued based on a discount to the market rate. As a result, the lower the stock price is around the time Tangiers is issued shares, the greater chance that Tangiers gets more shares. This could result in substantial dilution to the interests of other holders of common stock.
•*To the extent Tangiers sells our common stock, our common stock price may decrease due to the additional shares in the market. This could allow Tangiers to sell greater amounts of common stock, the sales of which would further depress the stock price.
•*The significant downward pressure on the price of our common stock as Tangiers sells material amounts of our common stock could encourage short sales by Tangiers or others. This could place further downward pressure on the price of our common stock.
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
The selling stockholders have advised us that the sale or distribution of our common stock owned by the selling stockholdersSelling Security Holder may be sold or transferred directly to purchasers by the selling stockholders as principals or throughuse any one or more underwriters, brokers, dealersof the following methods when selling shares:


·

ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;


·

block trades in which the broker-dealer will sell the shares as agent;


·

purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;


·

privately negotiated transactions;


·

broker-dealers may agree with the Selling Stock Holder to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;


·

through the writing or agents from time to time in onesettlement of options or moreother hedging transactions, (which may involve crosseswhether through an options exchange or block transactions) (i) on the over-the-counter marketotherwise;


·

a combination of any such methods of sale; or in


·

any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.


The Selling Security Holder or successors in-interest may also sell the shares directly to market on which the price of our shares of common stock are quoted makers acting as principals and/or (ii) in transactions otherwise than on the over-the-counter market. Any of such transactions may be effected at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to such prevailing market prices, at varying prices determined at the time of salebroker-dealers acting as agents for itself or at negotiated or fixed prices, in each case as determined by the selling stockho lders or by agreement between the selling stockholders and underwriters, brokers, dealers or agents, or purchasers. If the selling stockholders effect such transactions by selling their shares of common stock to or through underwriters, brokers, dealers or agents, such underwriters, brokers, dealers or agentsits customers.  Such broker-dealers may receive compensation in the form of discounts, concessions or commissions from the selling stockholders Selling Security Holder and/or commissions fromthe purchasers of common stockshares for whom theysuch broker-dealers may act as agent (which discounts, concessionsagents or commissionsto whom they sell as principal or both, which compensation as to a particular underwriters,broker-dealer might be in excess of customary commissions.  Market makers and block purchasers purchasing the shares will do so for their own account and at their own risk.  It is possible that the Selling Security Holder will attempt to sell shares of the Company’s common stock in block transactions to market makers or other purchasers at a price per share which may be below the then market price.  The Selling Security Holder cannot assure that all or any of the shares offered in this prospectus will be issued to, or sold by, the Selling Security Holder.  In addition, any brokers, dealers or agents, upon effecting the sale of any of the shares offered in this prospectus are “underwriters” as that term is defined under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, or the rules and regulations under such acts.  In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act.




Discounts, concessions, commissions and similar selling expenses, if any, attributable to the sale of shares will be borne by the Selling Security Holder.  The Selling Security Holder may agree to indemnify any agent, dealer or broker-dealer that participates in excesstransactions involving sales of those customarythe shares if liabilities are imposed on that person under the Securities Act.


The Selling Security Holder may from time to time pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the shares of our common stock owned by it and, if it defaults in the typesperformance of transactions involved).

its secured obligations, the pledgee or secured parties may offer and sell such the shares of common stock from time to time under this prospectus after we have filed an amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or any other applicable provision of the Securities Act amending the list of selling security holders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling security holders under this prospectus.


12

The Selling Security Holder also may transfer the shares of common stock in other circumstances, in which case the transferees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus and may sell the shares of common stock from time to time under this prospectus after we have filed an amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act amending the list of selling security holders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling security holders under this prospectus.


We are required to pay all fees and expenses incident to the registration of the shares of common stock.  Otherwise, all discounts, commissions or fees incurred in connection with the sale of our common stock offered hereby will be paid by the Selling Security Holder.


Tangiers

The Selling Security Holder acquired the securities offered hereby in the ordinary course of business and has advised us that it has not entered into any agreements, understandings or arrangements with any underwriters or broker-dealers regarding the sale of its shares of common stock, nor is there an underwriter or coordinating broker acting in connection with a proposed sale of shares of common stock by the Selling Security Holder.  We will file a supplement to this prospectus if the Selling Security Holder enters into a material arrangement with a broker-dealer for sale of common stock being registered.  If the Selling Security Holder uses this prospectus for any sale of the shares of common stock, it will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act.


Pursuant to a requirement by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, the maximum commission or discount to be received by any FINRA member or independent broker/dealer may not be greater than eight percent (8%) of the gross proceeds received by us for the sale of any securities being registered pursuant to SEC Rule 415 under the Securities Act.


The anti-manipulation rules of Regulation M under the Exchange Act may apply to sales of our common stock and activities of the Selling Security Holder.  The Selling Security Holder will act independently of us in making decisions with respect to the timing, manner and size of each sale.


TCA is an “underwriter” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with the sale of our common stock under the Securities PurchaseEquity Agreement.  Tangiers willAs further consideration for TCA entering into and structuring the equity facility, the Company shall pay us 88% of, or a 12% discount to TCA the volume weighted average price of our common stock on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board or other principal trading market on which our common stock is traded for the five (5) consecutive trading days immediately following the advance date. In addition, pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, Tangiers will receive a one-time commitment fee equal to $500,000 of the Company's common stock dividedFacility Fee Shares.  The Facility Fee Shares shall be issued by the lowest volume weighted average priceCompany to TCA in four (4) quarterly installments, the first of the Company's common stock during the 10 business days immediately followingsuch issuances being the date of execution of the Securities Purchase Agreement, as quoted by Bloomberg, LP.

Equity Agreement. The commitmentCompany issued 1,736,111 shares of common stock valued at $31,250 for the first installment on the date of execution of the Equity Agreement.  The Company has also recorded common stock issuable for the remaining three installments in the amount of the Securities Purchase Agreement is $25,000,000. After estimated fees and offering costs, we will receive net proceeds of approximately $24,950,000. At our current share price of $0.038 per share we will sell our stock to Tangiers5,208,333 common shares valued at 88% of the market price per share which equates to a share price of $0.0334.  If our current share price remains at $0.038 we will need to register 748,502,994 shares of our common stock in order to obtain the full $25,000,000 available to us under the Securities Purchase Agreement.$93,750.  The total amount of 3,367,080 shares of our common stock that we are registering under this registration statement will be issued to Tangiers in order to obtain the funds available to us under the Securities Purchase Agreement.  Which means we will be required to file another registration statem ent if we intend to obtain the full amount of funds available to us under the Securities Purchase Agreement. If we issue to Tangiers all 3,367,080 shares of our common stock we will register, we will only be able to receive approximately $62,460 in net proceeds after paying expenses related to this registration statement of approximately $50,000.
The dollar amount of the equity line was based on a number of considerations which include (i) the Company’s capital requirements; (ii) the Company’s then share price and then number of shares outstanding; and (iii) Tangiers’ ability to purchase shares in an amount required to provide capital toof common stock issuable will be adjusted based on the Company.
Underfuture market value of the Securities Purchase Agreement Tangiers contractually agrees not to engage in any short sales of ourcommon stock, and to our knowledge Tangiers has not engaged in any short sales or any other hedging activities related to our stock.
Tangiers was formed is a Delaware limited partnership. Tangiers is a domestic hedge fundas defined in the business of investing in and financing public companies. Tangiers does not intend to make a market in our stock or to otherwise engage in stabilizing or other transactions intended to help support the stock price. Prospective investors should take these factors into consideration before purchasing our common stock.
Under the securities laws of certain states, the shares of our common stock may be sold in such states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. The selling stockholders are advised to ensure that any underwriters, brokers, dealers or agents effecting transactions on behalf of the selling stockholders are registered to sell securities in all fifty states. In addition, in certain states the shares of our common stock may not be sold unless the shares have been registered or qualified for sale in such state or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and is complied with.
agreement.

We will pay all of the expenses incident to the registration, offering and sale of the shares of our common stock to the public hereunder other than commissions, fees and discounts of underwriters, brokers, dealers and agents.  If any of these other expenses exists, we expect the selling stockholdersTCA to pay these expenses.  We have agreed to indemnify TangiersTCA and its controlling persons against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.  We estimate that the expenses of the offering to be borne by us will be approximately $50,000. The offering expenses are estimated as follows: a SEC registration fee of $100.83 accounting fees of $14,800 and legal fees of $35,000.$40,000.  We will not receive any proceeds from the saleresale of any of the shares of our common stock by the selling stockholders. However, we willTCA.  We may, however, receive proceeds fr omfrom the sale of our common stock under the Securities PurchaseEquity Agreement.

The selling stockholders are subject to applicable provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and its regulations, including, Regulation M. Under Registration M, the selling stockholders or their agents may not bid for, purchase, or attempt to induce any person to bid for or purchase, shares




22



DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED


This prospectus includes  17,500,000 Shares of our common stock offered by the Selling Security Holder.  The following description of our common stock is only a summary.  You should also refer to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, which have been incorporated by reference as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.


We are authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value of $0.001 per share and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value of $0.001 per share, of which 51 have been designated as Series A Preferred Stock.   As of June 22, 2012, 87,418,881 shares of the Company’s common stock are issued and outstanding and 51 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock are issued and outstanding.  The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share for the election of directors and on all other matters to be voted upon by the stockholders.


There is no cumulative voting.  Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding securities, the holders of common stock are entitled to receive, when and if declared by the board of directors, out of funds legally available for such purpose, any dividends on a pro rata basis.  In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities, subject to prior distribution rights of preferred stock, if any, then outstanding.  The common stock has no preemptive or conversion rights or other subscription rights.  There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock.


DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS


Company Overview


We were incorporated as “Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc.” on July 24, 2007, in the State of Delaware for the purpose of engaging in mineral properties. On October 21, 2009, we entered into the Exchange Agreement with Diamond Information Institute, whereby we acquired all of the issued and outstanding common stock of Diamond Information Institute and changed the name of the Company to Bergio International Inc.


As a result of entering into the Exchange Agreement, we have determined to pursue the business plan of Diamond Information Institute.  We are now in the business of designing and manufacturing upscale jewelry.


Our Business


We concentrate on supplying our jewelry products to boutique, upscale jewelry stores. We currently sell our jewelry to approximately 50 independent jewelry retailers across the United States and have spent over $3 million in branding the “Bergio” name through tradeshows, trade advertising, national advertising and billboard advertising, since launching the line in 1995.  We have manufacturing control over our line as a result of having a manufacturing facility in New Jersey as well as subcontracts with facilities in Italy.


It is our intention to establish Bergio International as a holding company for the purpose of acquiring established jewelry design and manufacturing firms who possess branded product lines. Branded product lines are products and/or collections whereby the jewelry manufacturers have established their products within the industry through advertising in consumer and trade magazines as well as possibly obtaining federally registered trademarks and patents of their products and collections. This is in line with our strategy and belief that a brand name can create an association with innovation, design and quality which helps add value to the individual products as well as facilitate the introduction of new products.


We intend to acquire design and manufacturing firms throughout the United States and Europe. If and when we pursue any potential acquisition candidates, we intend to target the top 10% of the world’s jewelry manufacturers that have already created an identity and brand in the jewelry industry. We intend to locate potential candidates through our relationships in the industry and expect to structure the acquisition through the payment of cash, which will most likely be provided from third party financing, as well as our common stock but not cash generated from our operations. In the event we obtain financing from third parties for any potential acquisitions, Bergio International may agree to issue our common stock in exchange for the capital received. However, as of the date of this report, we do not have any binding agreements with any



23



potential acquisition candidates or arrangements with any third parties for financing.


Principal Products and Services


We have historically sold our products directly to distributors, retailers and other wholesalers, who then in turn sell their products to consumers through retail stores. Independent retail jewelers that offer the current Bergio line are not under formal contracts and most sell competing products as well.


Our products consist of a wide range of unique jewelry styles and designs made from precious metals such as gold, platinum and Karat gold, as well as other precious stones. We continuously innovate and change our designs based upon consumer trends. As a result of new designs being created we believe we are able to differentiate ourselves from our competition and strengthen our brands. We sell our products to our customers at price points that reflect the market price of the base material plus a markup reflecting our design fee and processing fees.


Each year, most jewelry manufacturers bring new products to market. We believe that we are a trendsetter in jewelry manufacturing. As a result, we come out with a variety of products throughout the year that we believe have commercial potential to meet what we feel are new trends within the industry. The “Bergio” designs consist of upscale jewelry that includes white diamonds, yellow diamonds, pearls, and colored stones, in 18K gold, platinum, and palladium. We currently design and produce approximately 75 to 100 product styles. Current retail prices for our products range from $400 to $200,000.


Our product range is divided into three fashion lines: (i) 18K gold line, (ii) a bridal line, and (iii) a couture and/or one of kind pieces. Our officer and director, Mr. Abajian, consults regularly with the design teams of his Italian manufacturers, which usually results in a constant continuation of new products and sometimes entire lines being developed. Typically, new products come on line approximately every year and most recently, Bergio International introduced its latest collection, Byzantine, Cestino, and Safari Collections, which launched in June 2010 and consists of approximately 35 pieces made with pink gold and diamonds. In 2011, we introduced two additional collections, Sistina and Rocca Collections. Depending on the timing and styling at any point in time, our products and collections would fall in one of the various categories shown below:


(1)

Whimsical. The whimsical line includes charms, crosses and other “add-on” pieces.


(2)

Fine. The proposed middle line will consist of fashion jewelry utilizing colored stones, diamonds and pearls applied to a variety of applications such as necklaces, pendants, earrings, bracelets and rings. The metals that we intend to use for the Middle line include platinum, 18K white & yellow gold.


(3)

Couture. The Couture line is our most luxurious line, and consists of one-of-a-kind pieces, new showcase products each year, and predominantly utilizes diamonds, platinum and other precious metals and stones of the highest grade and quality available.


(4)

Bridal. The Bridal line is our core business. We attempt to stay on the forefront of trends and designs in the bridal market with the latest in wedding sets, engagement rings and wedding bands for both men and women.


Each year, we attempt to expand and/or enhance these lines, while such selling stockholdersconstantly seeking to identify trends that we believe exist in the market for new styles or types of merchandise. Design and innovation are distributing sharesthe primary focus of our manufacturing and we are less concerned with the supply and capacity of raw materials. Mr. Abajian with his contacts, which are located mostly overseas, regularly meets to discuss, conceptualize and develop Bergio’s various products and collections. When necessary, additional suppliers and design teams can be brought in as the market needs dictate. Management intends to maintain a diverse line of jewelry to mitigate concentration of sales and continuously expand our market reach.





Distribution Methods and Marketing


We continue to devote our efforts towards brand development and utilize marketing concepts in an attempt to enhance the marketability of our products. During the past several years, we have carried out our brand development strategy based on our product quality and design excellence, which is highlighted through our sales personnel. We have established significant networks and relationships with retailers which allow our products to be promoted and sold nationwide. We maintain a broad base of customers and concentrate on retailers that sell fashionable and high end jewelry. We also work with our customers to adjust product strategies based on the customer’s feedback to try and decrease the likelihood of overstocked or undesired products.


We intend to further promote our products and brand by participating in trade shows and various exhibitions, consumer and trade advertisements, billboard advertisements, as well as make specialty appearances in retail stores carrying our products.


Sources and Availability of Raw Materials and Principal Suppliers


Most of the inventory and raw materials we purchase occurs through our manufacturers located in Europe. The inventory that we directly maintain is based on recent sales and revenues of our products but ultimately is at the discretion of Mr. Abajian and his experience in the industry. Our inventories are commodities that can be incorporated into future products or can be sold on the open market. Additionally, we perform physical inventory inspections on a quarterly basis to assess upcoming styling needs and consider the current pricing in metals and stones needed for our products.


We acquire all raw gemstones, precious metals and other raw materials used for manufacturing our products on the open market. We are not constrained in our purchasing by any contracts with any suppliers and acquire raw material based upon, among other things, availability and price on the open wholesale market.


Approximately 95% of our product line is now produced in our facility in Fairfield, New Jersey and 5% is contracted to our manufacturing supplier in Italy, who then procure the raw materials in accordance with the specifications and designs submitted by Bergio International. However, the general supply of precious metals and stones used by us can be reasonably forecast even though the prices will fluctuate. Any price differentials in the precious metals and stones will typically be passed on to the customer.


For the raw materials not procured by contracted manufacturers, we have approximately five suppliers that compete for our business, with our largest gold suppliers being ASD Casting Inc. Most of our precious stones are purchased from various diamond dealers. We do not have any formal agreements with any of our suppliers but have established an ongoing relationship with each of our suppliers.


Customers


During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company did not have one customer that accounted for approximately 5% or more of our annual sales. All of our sales are generated from our customer base of 50 customers, which includes luxury department store retailer Neiman Marcus.


Intellectual Property


Bergio is a federally registered trademarked name that we own. Since the first trademark of “Bergio” was filed, all advertising, marketing, trade shows and overall presentation of our product to the public has prominently displayed this trademark. As additional lines are designed and added to our products, we may trademark new names to distinguish the particular products and jewelry lines.





Employees


As of April 2, 2012, we had 3 full-time employees and 2 part-time employees. Of our current employees, 1 is sales and marketing personnel, 2 are manufacturing and 2 hold administrative and executive positions. No personnel are covered by this prospectus. Pursuanta collective bargaining agreement. We intend to use the services of independent consultants and contractors when possible or until we are able to hire internal personnel.


Competition and Market Overview


The jewelry design and manufacture industry is extremely competitive and has low barriers to entry. We compete with other jewelry designers and manufacturers of upscale jewelry as well as retail jewelry stores. There are over 2,500 jewelry design and manufacture companies worldwide, several of which have greater experience, brand name recognition and financial resources than Bergio International.


Our management believes that the jewelry industry competes in the global marketplace and therefore must be adaptable to remain competitive. Recently the U.S. economy has encountered a slowdown and Bergio International anticipates the U.S. economy will most likely remain weak at least through the end of 2012. Consumer spending for discretionary goods such as jewelry is sensitive to changes in consumer confidence and ultimately consumer confidence is affected by general business considerations in the U.S. economy. Consumer discretionary spending generally declines during times of falling consumer confidence, which may affect the retail sale of our products. U.S. consumer confidence reflected these slowing conditions throughout 2011. The impact of the slowing U.S. economy is not usually known until the third quarter of any given year in our industry, thus it is hard to estimate the actual impact the slowing economy will have on our business.


According to the United States Department of Commerce outlook, the United States apparent consumption of precious metal jewelry was expected to grow over the next few years at a slow but steady rate, before picking up considerably in 2013. A stronger economy, more spending by the baby boomers and young professionals with an overall trend toward luxury products will lead to future growth. From 2007 to 2011, apparent consumption of precious metal jewelry was expected to increase by an average of 3.9% per year, totaling $14.0 billion in 2011. Therefore, we intend to make strong efforts to maintain our brand in the industry through our focus on the innovation and design of our products as well as being able to consolidate and increase cost efficiency when possible through acquisitions.


Environmental Regulation and Compliance


The United States environmental laws do not materially impact our manufacturing as we are using state of the art equipment that complies with all relevant environmental laws.


Approximately 5% of the Company’s manufacturing is contracted to quality suppliers in the vicinity of Valenza, Italy, with the remaining 95% of setting and finishing work being conducted in Bergio International’s Fairfield, New Jersey facility. The setting and finishing work done in our New Jersey facility involves the use of precision lasers, rather than using old soldering procedures which uses gas and oxygen to assemble different elements. Soap and water is used as a standard to clean the jewelry. Also, a standard polishing compound is used for the finishing work but it does not have a material impact on our cost and effect of compliance with environmental laws.


Government Regulation


Currently, we are subject to all of the government regulations that regulate businesses generally such as compliance with regulatory requirements of Regulation S-Kfederal, state, and local agencies and authorities, including regulations concerning workplace safety, labor relations, and disadvantaged businesses. In addition, our operations are affected by federal and state laws relating to marketing practices in the retail jewelry industry. We are subject to the jurisdiction of federal, various state and other taxing authorities. From time to time, these taxing authorities review or audit our business.





Reports to Security Holders


We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, we file annual, quarterly and other reports and information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. You may read and copy these reports, statements, or other information we file at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F. Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20549. Our filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and the Internet worldwide website maintained by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.


DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY


Currently, we lease a 1,730 square feet design and manufacturing facility located in Fairfield, New Jersey.  The lease expired in August 31, 2010, and is being renewed on a month-to-month basis.  We also rent office space at this facility.  We pay approximately $1,800 per month.  Our Fairfield, New Jersey facility is presently adequate for the performance of all company functions, which includes manufacturing, design and administrative needs.


Additionally, we anticipate opening additional offices and/or design facilities in other locations as statedwe continue to implement our business plan throughout the United States, when and if any acquisitions are completed in Part IIthe future.  At the current time, our expansion plans are in the preliminary stages with no formal negotiations being conducted.  Most likely no expansions will take place until additional revenues can be achieved or additional capital can be raised to help offset the costs associated with any expansion.


LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


The Company is currently a defendant in a litigation filed by Moti Ganz USA, Ltd., as plaintiff, involving the return of this Registration Statement,a piece of jewelry valued at approximately $12,000. The Company is currently finalizing negotiations to have the jewelry returned.

The Company is currently a plaintiff in a litigation filed against Macau Consultants and Advisory Services, Inc., Diamond International, Inc., Stanley Larson, Merlin Larson, Dennis Atkins, Paul Crawford, et al, as defendants.  The litigation involves the sale of Diamond International, Inc. to Macau Consultants and Advisory Services, Inc. for a purchase price of $225,000.  A past due receivable balance of $137,500 was due to the Company must fileat December 31, 2011.  Subsequent to December 31, 2011, the Company received a post-effective amendmentpayment of $65,000, leaving a remaining balance of $72,500.

Other than the matters described above, we are currently not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the accompanying Registration Statement once informedknowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material change fromadverse effect.


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Some of the information set forthstatements contained in this prospectus that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” which can be identified by the use of terminology such as “estimates,” “projects,” “plans,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” or the negative or other variations, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties.  We urge you to be cautious of the forward-looking statements, that such statements, which are contained in this prospectus, reflect our current beliefs with respect to future events and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors affecting our operations, market growth, services, products and licenses.  No assurances can be given regarding the achievement of future results, as actual results may differ materially as a result of the risks we face, and actual events may differ from the assumptions underlying the statements that have been made regarding anticipated events.  Factors that may cause actual results, our performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements include without limitation:


·

Our ability to attract and retain management, and to integrate and maintain technical information and management information systems;


·

Our ability to raise capital when needed and on acceptable terms and conditions;


·

Our ability to procure or produce products and sell them at a reasonable profit;


·

The intensity of competition for products similar to ours; and


·

General economic conditions.


All written and oral forward-looking statements made are attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements.  Given the uncertainties that surround such statements, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.


Plan of Distribution.

Operation


13

We concentrate our business on boutique, upscale jewelry stores.  We currently sell our jewelry to approximately 50 independent jewelry retailers across the United States and have spent over $3 million in branding the Bergio name through tradeshows, trade advertising, national advertising and billboard advertising since launching the line in 1995.  Our products consist of a wide range of unique styles and designs made from precious metals such as, gold, platinum, and Karat gold, as well as diamonds and other precious stones.  We have approximately 50 to 75 product styles in our inventory, with prices ranging from $400 to $200,000.  We have manufacturing control over our line as a result of having a manufacturing facility in New Jersey as well as subcontracts with facilities in Italy.


It is our intention to establish Bergio International as a holding company for the purpose of acquiring established jewelry design and manufacturing firms who possess branded product lines.  Branded product lines are products and/or collections whereby the jewelry manufacturers have established their products within the industry through advertising in consumer and trade magazines as well as possibly obtaining federally registered trademarks of their products and collections.  This is in line with our strategy and belief that a brand name can create an association with innovation, design and quality which helps add value to the individual products as well as facilitate the introduction of new products.


OTC Bulletin Board Considerations

We intend to acquire design and manufacturing firms throughout the United States and Europe.  If and when we pursue any potential acquisition candidates, we intend to target the top 10% of the world’s jewelry manufactures that have already created an identity and brand in the jewelry industry.  We intend to locate potential candidates through our relationships in the industry and expect to structure the acquisition through the payment of cash, which will most likely be provided from third party financing, as well as our common stock but not cash generated from our operations.  In the event we obtain financing from third parties for any potential acquisitions, Bergio International may agree to issue our common stock in exchange for the capital received.  However, as of the date of this report, we do not have any binding agreements with any potential acquisition candidates or arrangements with any third parties for financing.


Results of Operations


For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2010


The OTC Bulletin Board is separatefollowing income and distinctoperating expenses tables summarize selected items from the NASDAQ stock market. NASDAQstatement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010.


INCOME:


 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

Increase/

 

 

 

2011

 

 

2010

 

 

(Decrease)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales - Net

 

$

1,621,011

 

 

$

1,445,570

 

 

 

12

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of Sales

 

 

926,684

 

 

 

812,831

 

 

 

14

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Profit

 

$

694,327

 

 

$

632,739

 

 

 

10

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Profit as a Percentage of Revenue

 

 

43

%

 

 

44

%

 

 

(--)

%





Sales


Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2011 were $1,621,011, compared to $1,445,570 for the year ended December 31, 2010.  This resulted in an increase of approximately $175,000 or 12% from the comparable period.  The increase in sales is primarily a result of increased volume as well as our efforts to introduce new products and to expand our customer base outside the United States and into Europe and Asia.  The Company does not engage in selling raw materials


Typically, revenues experience significant seasonal volatility in the jewelry industry.  The first two quarters of any given year typically represent approximately 15%-25% of total year revenues, based on historic results.  The holiday buying season during the last two quarters of every year typically account for the remainder of annual sales.


Cost of Sales


Cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $926,684 an increase of approximately $114,000, or 14%, from $812,831 for the year ended December 31, 2010.  The increase in cost of sales relative to sales primarily related to a bulk sale of diamonds in the third quarter of 2011, which generated very low profit margins. These sales occur infrequently as we are not in the business of selling raw materials.


Gross Profit


During the year ended December 31, 2011, our gross profit as a percentage of sales was 43%, compared to a gross profit as a percentage of sales of 44% for the year ended December 31, 2010.  Our decrease in gross profit percentage during 2011 was primarily attributable to the bulk sales of diamonds as described above. Our gross profit margin on fourth quarter 2011 sales was 56%.


OPERATING EXPENSES:


 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

Increase/

 

 

 

2011

 

 

2010

 

 

(Decrease)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling Expenses

 

$

412,276

 

 

$

317,463

 

 

 

30

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total General and Administrative Expenses

 

 

523,058

 

 

 

655,851

 

 

 

(20)

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Operating Expenses

 

$

935,334

 

 

$

973,314

 

 

 

(4)

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Income [Expense]

 

$

(167,321)

 

 

$

(498,424)

 

 

 

(66)

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Loss

 

$

(408,328)

 

 

$

(838,999)

 

 

 

(51)

%


Selling Expenses


Total selling expenses were $412,276 for the year ended December 31, 2011, which was approximately a $95,000 or 30% increase from $317,463 for the year ended December 31, 2010.  Selling expenses include advertising, trade show expenses, travel and selling commissions.  The increase in selling expenses during the year ended December 31, 2011 is a result of increased selling commissions, advertising and travel expenses as we implement our strategic plan to increase our customer base outside the United States.


General and Administrative Expenses


General and administrative expenses were $523,058 for the year ended December 31, 2011 versus $655,851 for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of approximately $133,000 or 20%.  The decrease in general and administrative expenses primarily results from a decrease in share-based services of $242,900, offset by increases in payroll costs and professional fees, incurred in the implementation our expansion plans and in our efforts to raise capital.




29



Loss from Operations


During the year ended December 31, 2011, we had a loss from operations totaling $241,007, which was a decrease of approximately $100,000 (29%) from the loss of $340,575 for the year ended December 31, 2010.  As discussed above, reductions in our general and administrative expenses, was the primary reason for the significant decrease in our operating loss.


Other Income [Expense]


Other Income [Expense] in the year ended December 31, 2011, is comprised primarily of the fair value change in our derivative of $176,841 net of interest expense of $66,332, amortization of debt discount of $199,895, write-down of other receivable of $72,500 and amortization of deferred financing costs of $6,785.  Other Income [Expense] in the year ended December 31, 2010, is comprised primarily of the $225,000 gain from the sale of our subsidiary, Diamond, and the fair value change in our derivative of $60,206 net of share-based financing costs of $595,160, interest expense of $68,240, and amortization of debt discount of $120,230.


Net Loss


We incurred a net loss of $408,328 for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to a net loss of $838,999 for the year ended December 31, 2010.  This represented a decrease in our net loss of approximately $431,000 (51%) from the comparable period, attributable to the various factors as discussed above.


For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011


The following income and operating expenses tables summarize selected items from the statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2011 .


Income


 

 

Three Months ended

March 31,

 

 

Increase/

 

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

(Decrease)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales - Net

 

$

329,947

 

 

$

270,551

 

 

 

22

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of Sales

 

 

135,660

 

 

 

181,053

 

 

 

(25)

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Profit

 

$

194,284

 

 

$

89,498

 

 

 

117

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Profit as a Percentage of Revenue

 

 

59

%

 

 

33

%

 

 

(--)

%


Sales


Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2012, were $329,947, compared to $270,551 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. This resulted in an increase of approximately $59,396 or 22% from the comparable period.  The increase in sales is primarily a result of our efforts to introduce new products and to expand our customer base outside the United States and into Europe and Asia.


Typically, revenues experience significant seasonal volatility in the jewelry industry.  The first two quarters of any given year typically represent approximately 15%-25% of total year revenues, based on historic results.  The holiday buying season during the last two quarters of every year typically account for the remainder of annual sales.





Cost of Sales


Cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2012, was $135,660, a decrease of approximately $45,393, or 25%, from $181,053 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  The decrease in cost of sales relative to sales is primarily due to selling old inventory at a higher margin because of the increase of the price of metals and diamonds.


Gross Profit


During the three months ended March 31, 2012, our gross profit as a percentage of sales was 59%, compared to a gross profit as a percentage of sales of 33% for the three months ended March 31, 2011 .  This increase in gross profit percentage during was primarily attributable to selling old Inventory as described above.


Operating Expenses


 

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

Increase/

 

 

 

2012

 

 

2011

 

 

(Decrease)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling Expenses

 

$

38,528

 

 

$

67,604

 

 

 

(43

%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total General and Administrative Expenses

 

 

188,210

 

 

 

180,819

 

 

 

4

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Operating Expenses

 

$

226,738

 

 

$

248,423

 

 

 

(9)

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Income (Expense)

 

$

(189,218

)

 

$

(18,905

)

 

 

901

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Loss

 

$

(221,669

)

 

$

(177,830

)

 

 

25

%


Selling Expenses


Total selling expenses were $38,528 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, which was approximately a $29,076 or 43% decrease from $67,604 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 .  Selling expenses include advertising, trade show expenses, travel and selling commissions.  The decrease in selling expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2012, is a result on cutting back on advertisement for the first quarter due to the volatility of the economy.


General and Administrative Expenses


General and administrative expenses were $188,210 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, versus $180,819 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, an increase of approximately $7,391 or 4%.

Loss from Operations


During the three months ended March 31, 2012, we had a loss from operations totaling $32,451, which was a decrease of approximately $126,474 (80%) from the loss of $158,925 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  As discussed above, reductions in our cost of sales and selling expenses and the increase in revenues was the primary reason for the significant decrease in our operating loss.





Other Income (Expense)


Other income (Expense) in the three months ended March 31, 2012, is comprised primarily of the fair value change in our derivative of $6,278, net interest expense of $15,889, amortization of debt discount of $130,038, and amortization of deferred financing costs of $20,772.  Other income (Expense) in the three months ended March 31, 2011, is comprised primarily of the fair value change in our derivative of $14,400, interest expense of $17,155, and amortization of debt discount of $16,150.


Net Loss


We incurred a net loss of $221,669 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to a net loss of $177,830 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  This represented an increase in our net loss of approximately $43,839 (25%) from the comparable period, attributable to the various factors.  The increase in net loss is primarily attributable to our increase in amortization of debt discount from March 31, 2011, to March 31 2012, of approximately $114,000 and an increase in amortization of deferred financing cost of approximately $21,000.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


The following table summarizes working capital at March 31, 2012, compared to  December 31, 2011 .


 

 

March 31,

2012

 

 

December 31,

2011

 

 

Increase /

(Decrease)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets

 

$

2,145,333

 

 

$

2,183,826

 

 

$

(-38,493)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities

 

$

1,249,208

 

 

$

1,214,369

 

 

$

34,839

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working Capital

 

$

896,125

 

 

$

969,457

 

 

$

(73,332)

 


At March 31, 2012, we had cash of $18,252, compared to a cash balance of $128,238 at December 31, 2011, a decrease of $109,986.  Over the next twelve months we believe that our existing capital combined with available borrowing under our bank line of credit and anticipated cash flow from operations will be sufficient to sustain our current operations. Additionally, our major stockholder has agreed to continue, at time to time as needed, to advance funds under similar terms as his prior advances.  It is anticipated that we will need to sell additional equity and/or debt securities in the event we locate potential mergers and/or acquisitions.


As of March 31, 2012, the Company believes it has cash on hand to sustain operations for approximately two months.  The Company is currently in the process of raising additional capital through convertible debt.  Further, the Company believes that financing obtained through the equity facility with TCA will allow the Company to sustain operations for the next twelve months, though there is no businessguarantee the Company will be able to receive the full amount under the equity line.


Our working capital decreased by 3% as of March 31, 2012, as discussed below.


Accounts receivable at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, was $383,572 and $385,642, respectively, representing a decrease of $2,070 or 1%.  We typically offer our customers 60, 90 or 120 day payment terms on sales, depending upon the product mix purchased.  When setting terms with our customers, we also consider the term of the relationship with issuersindividual customers and management’s assessed credit risk of the respective customer, and may at management’s discretion, increase or decrease payment terms based on those considerations.  The decrease in accounts receivable is primarily attributable to our increased collection efforts.





Inventory at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, was $1,674,659 and $1,529,394, respectively.  Our management seeks to maintain a very consistent inventory level that it believes is commensurate with current market conditions and manufacturing requirements related to anticipated sales volume.  We historically do not have an inventory reserve for slow moving or obsolete products due to the nature of our inventory of precious metals and stones, which are commodity-type raw materials and rise in value based on quoted market prices established in actively trade markets.  This allows for us to resell or recast these materials into new products and/or designs as the market evolves.


Accounts payable and accrued expenses at March 31, 2012, were $210,402, compared to $119,231 at December 31, 2011, which represents a 76% increase.  This increase is attributed to the purchasing of raw material for production for our upcoming Vegas JCK show.


Advances from our major stockholder at March 31, 2012, were $221,244, compared to $323,086 at December 31, 2011.  The decrease is a result of additional repayments in 2012.


Bank Lines of Credit and Notes Payable


Our indebtedness is comprised of various bank credit lines, term loans, capital leases and credit cards intended to provide capital for the ongoing manufacturing of our jewelry line, in advance of receipt of the payment from our retail distributors.  As of March 31, 2012, we had one outstanding term loan.  The term loan, with Leaf Financial Corp., which is payable in monthly installments and matures in April 2014, had an original balance of $100,000.  The note bears an annual interest rate of 10.52% and as of March 31, 2012, there was an outstanding balance of $48,342 .  The note is collateralized by our assets.  We also had a $300,000 term loan with JPMorgan Chase, which had an outstanding balance of $72,371 and was paid in the fourth quarter of 2011, through an assignment and convertible debenture agreement with Panache Capital, LLC, as discussed below.


In December 2011, we entered into a $75,000 bank line of credit agreement with Columbia Bank.  Interest is at the bank’s prime rate plus 1.75% with a minimum rate of 5.75%.   The credit line has been utilized in 2012. As of March 31, 2012, the outstanding balance is $20,500.  The line is collateralized by our assets as well as a personal guarantee by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Berge Abajian.  We had a bank line of credit of $55,000 with JPMorgan Chase Bank, which had an outstanding balance of $36,971 and was paid in the fourth quarter of 2011, through an assignment and convertible debenture agreement with Asher Enterprises, Inc. (“Asher”), as discussed below.


In addition to term loans, we have a number of various unsecured credit card obligations.  These obligations require minimal monthly payments of interest and principle and as of March 31, 2012, have interest rates ranging from 3.99% to 8.75%.  As of March 31, 2012, we have outstanding balances related to these obligations of $101,998 .


Convertible Debt


We have convertible debt notes maturing in various months during 2012, with the latest maturity of December 31, 2012.  The notes interest rates range from 8% to 12%.  The conversion feature is accounted for as an embedded derivative carried on our balance sheet at fair value and any unrealized change in fair value is a component on our statement of operations.  The embedded derivative is valued using the Black-Scholes pricing model.  At March 31, 2012 convertible debt of $460,542 is shown net of debt discount of $101,185.  For the three months ended March 31, 2012, amortization of debt discount amounted to $130,038 and unrealized gain from the change in the fair value of the derivative liability amounted to $6,278.


Satisfaction of Our Cash Obligations for the Next 12 Months


A critical component of our operating plan impacting our continued existence is to efficiently manage the production of our jewelry lines and successfully develop new lines through our Company or through possible acquisitions and/or mergers.  Our ability to obtain capital through additional equity and/or debt financing, and joint venture partnerships will also be important to our expansion plans.  In the event we experience any significant problems assimilating acquired assets into our operations or cannot obtain the



33



necessary capital to pursue our strategic plan, we may have to reduce the growth of our operations.  This may materially impact our ability to increase revenue and continue our growth.


Over the next twelve months we believe that our existing capital combined with available borrowing under our bank line of credit, equity facility with TCA, and anticipated cash flow from operations will be sufficient to sustain our current operations.  In addition, our major stockholder has agreed to continue, at time to time as needed, to advance funds under similar terms as his prior advances.  However, in the event we locate potential acquisitions and/or mergers we will most likely need to obtain additional funding through the sale of equity and/or debt securities. There can be no assurance that if additional funding is required we will be able to secure it on terms that are favorable to us or at all.


Research and Development


We are not anticipating significant research and development expenditures in the near future.


Expected Purchase or Sale of Plant and Significant Equipment


We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any plant or significant equipment; as such items are not required by us at this time.


Significant Changes in the Number of Employees


We currently have 3 full-time employees and 2 part-time employees.  Of our current employees, 1 is sales and marketing personnel, 2 are manufacturing and 2 hold administrative and executive positions.  None of our employees are subject to any collective bargaining agreements.  We do not anticipate a significant change in the number of full time employees over the next 12 months.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements


We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, results or operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is deemed material.


Critical Accounting Policies


The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Preparing financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported period.


Accounts Receivable


Management periodically performs a detailed review of amounts due from customers to determine if accounts receivable balances are impaired based on factors affecting the collectability of those balances.  Management has provided an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $48,000 and $48,000 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.


Long-Lived Assets


In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, long-lived tangible assets subject to depreciation or amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measures by the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value as determined by an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows.  As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by management in their impairment analyses may not be achieved.





Fair Value of Financial Instruments


The Company follows guidance issued by the FASB on “Fair Value Measurements” for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.  This guidance establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to existing generally accepted accounting principles that require the use of fair value measurements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements.  


The FASB defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  Additionally, the FASB requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.


These inputs are prioritized below:


·

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.


·

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.


·

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the use of the reporting entity’s own assumptions.


The Company discloses the estimated fair value for all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair value.  As of March 31, 2012, the fair value of short-term financial instruments including cash overdraft, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximates book value due to their short-term maturity. The fair value of property and equipment is estimated to approximate its net book value. The fair value of debt obligations, other than convertible debt obligations, approximates their face values due to their short-term maturities and/or the variable rates of interest associated with the underlying obligations.

��

The following are the major categories of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, using quoted prices in active markets for identical liabilities (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

 

 

March 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Derivative Liabilities

 

$

--

 

 

$

310,230

 

 

$

--

 

 

$

310,230

 

 

$

--

 

 

$

282,584

 

 

$

--

 

 

$

282,584

 


In addition, the FASB issued, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” This guidance expands opportunities to use fair value measurements in financial reporting and permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The Company did not elect the fair value option for any of its qualifying financial instruments.

Deferred Offering and Deferred Financing Costs

We defer certain costs associated with financing activities related to the issuance of equity securities (deferred offering costs) and debt securities (deferred financing costs). These costs consist primarily of legal, banking and other professional fees related to the transactions. Upon successful completion of the offering of equity securities, deferred offering costs are recorded as a reduction of the net proceeds in paid in capital. If the offering is not successful, such costs will be expensed. Deferred financing costs are amortized over the life of the related debt.


Equity-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for equity based compensation transactions with employees under the provisions of ASC Topic No. 718, “Compensation: Stock Compensation” (“Topic No. 718”). Topic No. 718 requires the recognition of the fair value of equity-based compensation in net income. The fair value of common stock issued for compensation is measured at the market price on the date of grant. The fair value of the Company’s equity instruments, other than common stocks, is estimated using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. This model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions and elections including expected stock price volatility and the estimated life of each award. In addition, the calculation of equity-based compensation costs requires that the Company estimate the number of awards that will be forfeited during the vesting period. The fair value of equity-based awards granted to employees is amortized over the vesting period of the award and the Company elected to use the straight-line method for awards granted after the adoption of Topic No. 718.

The Company accounts for equity based transactions with non-employees under the provisions of ASC Topic No. 505-50, “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees” (“Topic No. 505-50”). Topic No. 505-50 establishes that equity-based payment transactions with non-employees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of common stock issued for payments to non-employees is measured at the market price on the date of grant. The fair value of equity instruments, other than common stock, is estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. In general, the Company recognizes an asset or expense in the same manner as if it was to receive cash for the goods or services instead of paying with or using the equity instrument.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s management recognizes revenue when realized or realizable and earned.  In connection with revenue, the Company established a sales return and allowance reserve for anticipated merchandise to be returned based on historical operations.  The Company’s sole revenue producing activity as a manufacturer and distributor of upscale jewelry is affected by movement in fashion trends and customer desire for new designs, varying economic conditions affecting consumer spending and changing product demand by retailers affecting their desired inventory levels.  Realizing that this may, and in some periods has, resulted in a significant amount of sales returns, management revised the Company policy of accepting merchandise returns.  Whereas under prior policy customers had up to 360 days to return merchandise and were allowed credits as offsets to their outstanding accounts receivable, under the current return policy merchandise, with limited exceptions, cannot be returned.


Recently Issued Accounting Standards


On May 12, 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04.  The ASU is the result of joint efforts by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to develop a single, converged fair value framework.  Thus, there are few differences between the ASU and its international counterpart, IFRS 13.  This ASU is largely consistent with existing fair value measurement principles in U.S. GAAP; however it expands ASC 820’s existing disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and makes other amendments.  The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.   The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

On June 16, 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, which revises the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements.  The new guidance removes the presentation options in ASC 220 and requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements.  The ASU does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income.  The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.   The adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have an effect on the accompanying financial statements.





MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY

AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS


(a) Market Information


The Company’s Common Stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board.OTCBB under the symbol BRGO.OB.  The SEC’s order handling rules, which apply to NASDAQ-listed securities,following table sets forth the range of the high and low bid quotations of the Company’s common stock for the past three years in the over-the-counter market, as reported by the OTCBB.  The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.


Calendar Quarter Ended:


 

 

 

High

 

 

 

Low

 

2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31

 

$

0.02

 

 

$

0.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31

 

$

0.11

 

 

$

0.01

 

June 30

 

 

0.07

 

 

 

0.01

 

September 30

 

 

0.12

 

 

 

0.01

 

December 31

 

 

0.09

 

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31

 

$

0.04

 

 

$

0.04

 

June 30

 

 

0.02

 

 

 

0.02

 

September 30

 

 

0.25

 

 

 

0.12

 

December 31

 

 

0.35

 

 

 

0.07

 


(b) Holders


As of June 22, 2012 , we estimate that there were approximately  39 holders of record of our common stock.  This figure does not take into account those shareholders whose certificates are held in the name of broker-dealers or other nominees.


(c) Dividends


We have never paid any cash dividends on our common shares, and we do not applyanticipate that we will pay any dividends with respect to securities quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board.

Although the NASDAQ stock market has rigorous listing standards to ensure the high quality of its issuers, and can delist issuers for not meeting those standards, the OTC Bulletin Board has no listing standards. Rather, it is the market maker who chooses to quote a security on the system, files the application, and is obligated to comply with keeping information about the issuer in its files. The FINRA cannot deny an application by a market maker to quote the stock of a company. The only requirement for inclusionsecurities in the OTC Bulletin Boardforeseeable future.  Our current business plan is thatto retain any future earnings to finance the issuer be current in its reporting requirementsexpansion development of our business.


(d) Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plan


As of December 31, 2011, we had an incentive stock and award plan under which 5,000,000 shares had been reserved for issuance.  The following table shows information with respect this plan as of the SEC.

Investors must contact a broker-dealer to trade OTC Bulletin Board securities. Investors do not have direct access to the bulletin board service. For bulletin board securities, there only has to be one market maker.
Bulletin board transactions are conducted almost entirely manually. Because there are no automated systems for negotiating trades on the bulletin board, they are conducted via telephone. In times of heavy market volume, the limitations of this process may result in a significant increase in the time it takes to execute investor orders. Therefore, when investors place market orders – an order to buy or sell a specific number of shares at the current market price – it is possible for the price of a stock to go up or down significantly during the lapse of time between placing a market order and getting execution.
Because bulletin board stocks are usually not followed by analysts, there may be lower trading volume than for NASDAQ-listed securities.
fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.




LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is not a party to any litigation.

Equity Compensation Plan Information


Plan category

 

Number of securities

 to be issued upon

exercise of outstanding

 options, warrants and

 rights (a)

 

 

Weighted-average

exercise price of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights (b)

 

 

Number of securities

 remaining available for

 future issuance under

 equity compensation

 plans (excluding

securities reflected in

 column (a)) (c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 

 

533,553

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,466,447

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

533,553

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

4,466,447

 


CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON

ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


None.


DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS


The following table and text sets forth the names and positionsages of all our directors and executive officers and directors. Ourour key management personnel as of June 22, 2012 . All of our directors are elected at ourserve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and serve for one year or until their successors are elected and quality.  Our Board of Directors elects ourqualified, or until their earlier death, retirement, resignation or removal. Executive officers and their terms of office areserve at the discretion of the Board, except to the extent governed by an employment contract.

Ourboard of directors, executive officers and other significant employees, their ages and positions are as follows:
NameAgePosition with the Company
Berge Abajian(1)50Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Arpi Abajian (2)46Secretary

(1) Berge Abajian became the Company’s sole Director and Chief Executive Officer in October, 2009 as part of the Company’s acquisition of the Diamond Information Institute, Inc., a publically held New Jersey corporation.  Immediately following the closing of the acquisition the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and sole director, Mr. Owen Gibson, resigned and Mr. Abajian was appointed as our sole officer and director.

(2) Arpi Abajian waselected or appointed to serve as Secretary byuntil the Company’snext Board of Directors on October 29, 2009. Ms. Abajianmeeting following the annual meeting of stockholders. Also provided is a brief description of the wifebusiness experience of Mr. Abajian the Company’s sole Directoreach director and executive officer and the key management personnel during the past five years and an indication of directorships held by each director in other companies subject to the reporting requirements under the Federal securities laws.


Name

Age

Position

Berge Abajian

52

Chief Executive Officer, Chairman

Arpi Abajian

49

Secretary


Following is a brief summary of the Company.

background and experience of each director and executive officer of Bergio International, Inc.:



14



Berge Abajian became the Chief Executive Officer of Bergio International in October 2009. Prior to that, Mr. Abajian served as CEO of the Diamond Information Institute, a publicly tradedthe predecessor company listed on the Over-the Counter-Bulletin Board,to Bergio International, from 1988 to October 2009. Mr. Abajian has a BS in Business Administration from Fairleigh Dickinson University and is well known and respected in the jewelry industry. Since 2005, Mr. Abajian has served as the President of the East Coast branch of the Armenian Jewelry Association and has also served as a Board Member on MJSA (Manufacturing Jewelers and Suppliers of America), New York Jewelry Association, and the 2001-2002 Luxury Show.


Arpi Abajian, was appointed our Secretary on October 29, 2009, by the Company’s Board of Directors. For the past 10 years, Ms. Abajian has worked at Bergio (formerly known as Diamond Information InstituteInstitute) in various administrative positions. Ms. Abajian is currently married to the Chief Executive Officer and Sole DirectorChairman of our company and does not serve on the board of any other companies.




Term of Office


Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board, except to the extent governed by an employment agreement.


Involvement Inin Certain Legal Proceedings

None


To the best of our officers, directors, promoters or control persons have been involved inknowledge, during the past  fiveten years, in anynone of the following:

following occurred with respect to our present or former director, executive officer, or employee: (1) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;
(2) any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);
(3) Beingbeing subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, orof any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or
and (4) Beingbeing found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the CommissionSEC or the CommodityCommodities Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.
Directors


We currently have one director.  Immediately prior to the effective time of the Acquisition, Owen Gibson resigned as our sole officer and director. Pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, Berge Abajian, who prior to the Acquisition was the director of the Diamond Information Institute, Inc, was appointed as our director.

All directors hold office for one-year terms until the election and qualification of their successors. Officers are elected by the board of directors and serve at the discretion of the board.

There are no family relationships among our directors and executive officers.

Meetings of Our Board of Directors


Our board of directors did not hold any meetings during the most recently completed fiscal year end. Various matters were approved by consent resolution, which in each case was signed by each of the members of the Board then serving.


Committees of the Board


We do not currently have a compensation committee, executive committee, or stock plan committee.



15


Audit Committee


We do not have a separately-designated standing audit committee. The entire Board of Directors performs the functions of an audit committee, but no written charter governs the actions of the Board when performing the functions of what would generally be performed by an audit committee. The Board approves the selection of our independent accountants and meets and interacts with the independent accountants to discuss issues related to financial reporting. In addition, the Board reviews the scope and results of the audit with the independent accountants, reviews with management and the independent accountants our annual operating results, considers the adequacy of our internal accounting procedures and considers other auditing and accounting matters including fees to be paid to the independent auditor and the performance of the independent a uditor.

auditor.


Nomination Committee


Our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors does not maintain a nominating committee. As a result, no written charter governs the director nomination process. Our size and the size of our Board, at this time, do not require a separate nominating committee.


When evaluating director nominees, our directors consider the following factors:


·

The appropriate size of our Boardboard of Directors;

directors;


·

Our needs with respect to the particular talents and experience of our directors;


·

The knowledge, skills and experience of nominees, including experience in finance, administration or public service, in light of prevailing business conditions and the knowledge, skills and experience already possessed by other members of the Board;




·

Experience in political affairs;


·

Experience with accounting rules and practices; and


·

The desire to balance the benefit of continuity with the periodic injection of the fresh perspective provided by new Board members.


Our goal is to assemble a Board that brings together a variety of perspectives and skills derived from high quality business and professional experience. In doing so, the Board will also consider candidates with appropriate non-business backgrounds.


Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees, although the Board may also consider such other factors as it may deem are in our best interests as well as our stockholders. In addition, the Board identifies nominees by first evaluating the current members of the Board willing to continue in service. Current members of the Board with skills and experience that are relevant to our business and who are willing to continue in service are considered for re-nomination. If any member of the Board does not wish to continue in service or if the Board decides not to re-nominate a member for re-election, the Board then identifies the desired skills and experience of a new nominee in light of the criteria above. Current members of the Board are polled for suggestions as to individuals meeting the criteria descri beddescribed above. The Board may also engage in research to identify qualified individuals. To date, we have not engaged third parties to identify or evaluate or assist in identifying potential nominees, although we reserve the right in the future to retain a third party search firm, if necessary. The Board does not typically consider shareholder nominees because it believes that its current nomination process is sufficient to identify directors who serve our best interests.


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance


Our officers, directors and shareholders owning greater than ten percent of our shares are not required to comply with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 because we do not have a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


Code of Ethics


We do not currently have a code of ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer or Controller, or persons performing similar functions. Because we have only limited business operations and four officers and directors, we believe a code of ethics would have limited utility. We intend to adopt such a code of ethics as our business operations expand and we have more directors, officers and employees.


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Overview


The following is a discussion of our program for compensating our named executive officers and directors.  Currently, we do not have a compensation committee, and as such, our board of directors is responsible for determining the compensation of our named executive officers.


Compensation Program Objectives and Philosophy


The primary goals of our policy of executive compensation are to attract and retain the most talented and dedicated executives possible, to assure that our executives are compensated effectively in a manner consistent with our strategy and competitive practice and to align executive compensation with the achievement of our short- and long-term business objectives.





The board of directors considers a variety of factors in determining compensation of executives, including their particular background and circumstances, such as their training and prior relevant work experience, their success in attracting and retaining savvy and technically proficient managers and employees, increasing our revenues, broadening our product line offerings, managing our costs and otherwise helping to lead our Company through a period of rapid growth.


In the near future, we expect that our board of directors will form a compensation committee charged with the oversight of executive compensation plans, policies and programs of our Company and with the full authority to determine and approve the compensation of our chief executive officer and make recommendations with respect to the compensation of our other executive officers.  We expect that our compensation committee will continue to follow the general approach to executive compensation that we have followed to date, rewarding superior individual and company performance with commensurate cash compensation.


Employment Agreements


On September 1, 2011, the Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement (the “Amended Agreement”) with Mr. Abajian, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, restating that certain employment agreement by and between parties as of February 28, 2010.


Pursuant to the terms of the Amended Agreement, Mr. Abajian shall serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer for a period of five years, commencing retroactively on February 28, 2010, and expiring on February 28, 2015 (the “Term”).  Upon conclusion of the Term, the Amended Agreement shall be automatically renewed for successive one year periods upon the same terms and conditions unless terminated by either of the parties in accordance with the Amended Agreement’s terms.


Mr. Abajian is to receive a base salary in the amount of $175,000 per annum for year one, commencing on February 28, 2010, and shall increase at a rate of three percent (3%) per annum for each consecutive year after 2010, or at such rates as are approved from time to time by the Company’s board of directors.  In addition, Mr. Abajian is to receive an annual bonus equal to one-half percent (0.5%) based upon the Company’s annual net profit before taxes.  Mr. Abajian is also eligible to participate in the Company’s medical insurance plan, life insurance plan or any 401(k), pension or similar plans that are now or may be in the future established, for the general benefit of the Company’s senior executives.  Further, and pursuant to the terms of the Amended Agreement, the Company issued to Mr. Abajian 51 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share, subject to certain increases.


Stock-Based Awards under the Equity Incentive Plan


We have adopted an unfunded Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan to compensate our Chief Executive Officer.  Under this Plan, we are not required to reserve funds for compensation, and we are only obligated to pay compensation when and if funds are available.  Any amounts due but unpaid automatically accrue to deferred compensation.  The Plan has the option to be renewed annually at the discretion of our company.  While unfunded and non-recourse, for compliance with GAAP this is disclosed as an accrued expense on the balance sheet.


Retirement Benefits


Currently, we do not provide any Company sponsored retirement benefits to any employee, including the named executive officers.


Perquisites


We have historically, provided only modest perquisites to our named executive officers. We do not view perquisites as a significant element of our compensation structure, but do believe that perquisites can be useful in attracting, motivating and retaining the executive talent for which we compete.  It is expected that our historical practices regarding perquisites will continue and will be subject to periodic review by our by our board of directors.




Summary Compensation Table


The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our executive officers for all services rendered in all capacities to us for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.


The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our executive officers for all services rendered in all capacities to us for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE


Name and

principal position

Year

Salary

($)

Bonus

($)

Option

Awards

($)

Stock Awards

($)

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan Comp.

($)

Nonqualified

Deferred

Comp.

Earnings ($)

All Other

Comp.

($)

Total

($)

Berge Abajian

Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chairman

2011

77,885

0

0

0

0

0

15,189 (1)

93,074

 

2010

141,666

0

0

0

0

0

17,873 (1)

159,539

 

2009

13,413

0

0

20,000 (2)

0

0

17,856 (1)

51,269

Arpi Abajian

2011

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Secretary

2010

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

2009

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0


(1)

Other compensation was made up of Mr. Abajian’s car expense and health insurance expenses.


(2)

The amounts shown in this column reflect the expense recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, in accordance with FAS 123(R). On February 11, 2009, Mr. Abajian was issued 10,942 shares of common stock as compensation in advance for serving on Diamond Information Institute’s Board of Directors for the 2009 fiscal year. None of the shares owned by Mr. Abajian have any registration rights attached to them.


Incentive Stock and Award Plan


On May 9, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors approved, authorized and adopted the 2011 Incentive Stock and Award Plan (the “Plan”).  Subject to adjustment for mergers, reorganizations, consolidation, recapitalization, stock dividend or other change in corporate structure, a total of 5,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share is subject to the Plan.  Under the Plan, the Company may grant non-qualified options (the “Non-qualified Options”), incentive options (the “Incentive Options” and together with the Non-qualified Options, the “Options”) and restricted stock (the “Restricted Stock”) to directors, officers, consultants, attorneys, advisors and employees.  Subject to a tax exception, if any Option or Restricted Stock expires or is canceled prior to its exercise or vesting in full, the shares of common stock issuable under the Option or Restricted Stock may be issuable pursuant to future Options or Restricted Stock under the Plan.


The Plan shall be administered by a committee consisting of one (1) director (the “Committee”).  In the absence of such a Committee, the Company’s Board of Directors shall administer the Plan.


Each Option shall contain the following material terms:


(i) the exercise price, which shall be determined by the Committee at the time of grant, shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value (defined as the closing price on the final trading day immediately prior to the grant on the principal exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock is listed or quoted, as applicable) of the Common Stock of the Company on the date the Option is granted, provided that if the recipient of the Option owns more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of the Company, the exercise price shall be at least 110% of the Fair Market Value;




(ii) the term of each Option shall be fixed by the Committee, provided that such Option shall not be exercisable more than ten (10) years after the date such Option is granted, and provided further that with respect to an Incentive Option, if the recipient owns more than ten percent (10%) of the total combined voting power of the Company, the Incentive Stock Option shall not be exercisable more than five (5) years after the date such Incentive Option is granted;


(iii) subject to acceleration in the event of a Change of Control of the Company (as further described in the Plan), the period during which the Options vest shall be designated by the Committee or, in the absence of any Option vesting periods designated by the Committee at the time of grant, shall vest and become exercisable in equal amounts on each fiscal year of the Company through the five (5) year anniversary of the date on which the Option was granted;


(iv) no Option is transferable and each is exercisable only by the recipient of such Option except in the event of the death of the recipient; and


(v) with respect to Incentive Stock Options, the aggregate Fair Market Value of Common Stock that may be issued for the first time during any calendar year shall not exceed $100,000.


Each award of Restricted Stock is subject to the following material terms:


(i) no rights to an award of Restricted Stock is granted to the intended recipient of Restricted Stock unless and until the grant of Restricted Stock is accepted within the period prescribed by the Committee;


(ii) Restricted Stock shall not be delivered until they are free of any restrictions specified by the Committee at the time of grant;


(iii) shares of Restricted Stock are forfeitable until the terms of the Restricted Stock grant have been satisfied; and


(iv) the Restricted Stock are not transferable until the date on which the Committee has specified such restrictions have lapsed.


Stock Option Grants


We have not granted any stock options to the executive officers or directors since the adoption of the Plan.


Director Compensation


None.


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT


The following table sets forth, as of April 15, 2010June 22, 2012, certain information as to shares of our common stock owned by (i) each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, (ii) each of our directors, and (iii) all of our executive officers and directors as a group:


16

Names and Address of Directors, Officers and 5% Stockholders (1)

 

Number of Shares Owned

 

 

Percent

 

Berge Abajian, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chairman

 

 

7,695,300

 

 

 

8.80

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arpi Abajian, Secretary

 

 

5,471

 

 

 

*

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Directors and Officers as a Group (2 persons)

 

 

7,700,771

 

 

 

8.81

%






Name and Address of Beneficial Owners of Common StockTitle of Class
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership1
% of Common Stock2
Berge AbajianCommon Stock26,654,700 Shares31.7%
Arpi AbajianCommon Stock65,652 SharesLess than 1%
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS – TOTAL 26,720,352 Shares31.8%
5% SHAREHOLDERS
 
Arabel
Common Stock4,500,0005.4%
1.

(1) Beneficial Ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to options, warrants, or convertible debt currently exercisable or convertible, or exercisable or convertible within 60 days of April 15, 2010 are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such option or warrant. Percentages are based on a total of 84,109,288 shares of common stock outstanding on April 15, 2010 and shares issuable upon the exercise of options, warrants exercisable, and debt convertible on or within 60 days of April 15, 2010, as described above. The inclusion in the aforementioned table of those shares, however, does not constitute an admission that the named shareholder is a direct o r indirect beneficial owner of those shares. Unless otherwise indicated, to our knowledge based upon information produced by the persons and entities named in the table, each person or entity named in the table has sole voting power and investment power, or shares voting and/or investment power with his or her spouse, with respect to all shares of capital stock listed as owned by that person or entity.


Addresses for all of the individuals listed in the table below are c/o Bergio International, 12 Daniel Road East Fairfield, New Jersey 07004.


DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED
General
The following description of our capital stock and the provisions of our Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws, each as amended, is only a summary.
Common Stock
We have 200,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share of common stock authorized,subject to options, warrants, or convertible debt currently exercisable or convertible, or exercisable or convertible within 60 days of which 84,109,288 shares wereJune 22, 2012 , are deemed outstanding as of April 15, 2010.
Voting Rights
Holders of common stock havefor computing the right to cast one vote for each share of stock in his or her own name on the bookspercentage of the corporation, whether represented in person holding such option or by proxy,warrant. Percentages are based on all matters submitted to a votetotal of holders of common stock, including the election of directors.  There is no right to cumulative voting in the election of directors.  Except where a greater requirement is provided by statute or by the Articles of Incorporation, or by the Bylaws, the presence, in person or by proxy duly authorized, of the holder or holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of the our common voting stock shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The vote by the holders of a majority of such outstanding shares is also required to effect certain fundamental corporate changes such as liquidation, merger o r amendment of the Company's Articles of Incorporation.

17



Dividends
There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that restrict us from declaring dividends. The Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) provides that a corporation may pay dividends out of surplus, out the corporation's net profits for the preceding fiscal year, or both provided that there remains in the stated capital account an amount equal to the par value represented by all shares of the corporation's stock raving a distribution preference.
We have not declared any dividends, and we do not plan to declare any dividends in the foreseeable future.
Pre-emptive Rights
Holders of common stock are not entitled to pre-emptive or subscription or conversion rights, and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the Common Stock. All outstanding87,418,881 shares of common stock are,outstanding on June 22, 2012, and shares issuable upon the exercise of options, warrants exercisable, and debt convertible on or within 60 days of June 22, 2012 , as described above. The inclusion in the aforementioned table of those shares, however, does not constitute an admission that the named shareholder is a direct or indirect beneficial owner of those shares. Unless otherwise indicated, to our knowledge based upon information produced by the persons and entities named in the table, each person or entity named in the table has sole voting power and investment power, or shares voting and/or investment power with his or her spouse, with respect to all shares of capital stock listed as owned by that person or entity.


TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS, PROMOTERS AND CERTAIN CONTROL PERSONS


The Company receives periodic advances from its principal stockholder, Berge Abajian, based upon the Company’s cash flow needs.  At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, $221,244 and $323,086, respectively was due to Mr. Abajian.  As of today, the outstanding amount is $210,720.97.   Interest expense is accrued at an average annual market rate of interest which was 3.94% and 3.25% at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.  No terms for repayment have been established.  As a result, the amount is classified as a Current Liability.


Director Independence


At this time, the Company does not have any independent directors.


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION


We have filed a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act, relating to the shares of common stock being offered hereby will be when issued, fully paidby this prospectus, and non-assessable.


Options
We havereference is made to such registration statement. This prospectus constitutes the prospectus of Bergio International Inc., filed as part of the registration statement, and it does not issued and do not have outstanding any options to purchase shares of our common stock.

Preferred Stock
We have 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per share of preferred stock authorized.  No shares of preferred stockcontain all information in the registration statement, as certain portions have been issued.

Anti-Takeover Effects Of Provisions Of The Articles Of Incorporation Authorized And Unissued Stock
The authorized but unissued shares of our common stock are available for future issuance without our stockholders’ approval.  These additional shares may be utilized for a variety of corporate purposes including but not limited to future public or direct offerings to raise additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee incentive plans.  The issuance of such shares may also be used to deter a potential takeover of the Company that may otherwise be beneficial to stockholders by diluting the shares held by a potential suitor or issuing shares to a stockholder that will voteomitted in accordance with the Company’s Boardrules and regulations of Directors’ desires.  A takeoverthe U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.


You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information we file at the SEC’s public reference facility maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can request copies of these documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the SEC. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference room. Our SEC filings are also available to the public through the SEC’s Internet website at http://www.sec.gov.


DISCLOSURE OF COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION

FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES


Under our by-laws , we may indemnify an officer or director who is made a party to any proceeding, including a lawsuit, because of his position, if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in our best interest.  We may advance expenses incurred in defending a proceeding.  To the extent that the officer or director is successful on the merits in a proceeding as to which he is to be indemnified, we must indemnify him against all expenses incurred, including attorney’s fees.  With respect to a derivative action, indemnity may be beneficialmade only for expenses actually and reasonably incurred in defending the proceeding, and if the officer or director is judged liable, only by a court order.  The indemnification is intended to stockholders because, among other reasons, a potential suitor may offer stockholders a premium for their shares of stock comparedbe to th e then-existing market price.

The existence of authorized but unissued and unreserved shares of preferred stock may enable the Board of Directors to issue shares to persons friendly to current management which would render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain controlfullest extent permitted by the laws of the Company by meansState of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise, and thereby protect the continuity of our management.
Delaware


DISCLOSURE OF SEC POSITION OF INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES
ACT LIABILITIES
Our Articles of Incorporation include an indemnification provision under which we have agreed to indemnify our directors and officers of from and against certain claims arising from or related to future acts or omissions as a director or officer of the Company.  

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers andor persons controlling personsthe registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advisedinformed that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable. If a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than





LEGAL MATTERS


The validity of the payment by us of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of Bergio International , Inc.+ in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered) we will, unless in the opinionshares of our counselcommon stock offered by the matterSelling Stock Holders has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governedpassed upon by the final adjudicationlaw firm of such issue.

Lucosky Brookman LLP.


18

EXPERTS



EXPERTS

The audited financialbalance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and the related statements includedof operations, statements of changes in this prospectusshareholders’ deficit and elsewhere in the registration statementstatements of cash flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20092011 and 2010, included in this registration statement on Form S-1 have been audited by Silberstein Ungar, PLLC and by MSPC, Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, A Professional Corporationforso included in reliance on the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The reportsreport of Silberstein Ungar, PLLC, and MSPC, Certified Public Accountants and Advisors, A Professional Corporation are included in this prospectus in reliancean independent registered public accounting firm, given upon thetheir authority of this firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

















No expert or counsel named in this prospectus as having prepared or certified any part of this prospectus or having given an opinion upon the validity of the securities being registered or upon other legal matters in connection with the registration or offering of the common stock was employed on a contingency basis or had, or is to receive, in connection with the offering, a substantial interest, directly or indirectly, in the registrant or any of its parents or subsidiaries.


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.


INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010


PAGES

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

47

BALANCE SHEETS

48

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

49

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

50

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

51

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

52
















CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

On October 22, 2009, Board of Directors of the Company dismissed Seale and Beers, CPAs, its independent registered public account firm. On October 27, 2009, the accounting firm of

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC was engaged as the Company’s new independent registered public accounting firm. The Board of Directors of the Company approved of the dismissal of Seale and Beers, CPAs and the engagementBusiness Advisors

Phone (248) 203-0080

Fax (248) 281-0940

30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175

Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586

www.sucpas.com


Report of Silberstein Ungar, PLLC as its independent auditor.


Seale and Beers, CPAs did not produce a report on the Company’s financial statements for either of the past two years or any interim period through the date of dismissal on October 22, 2009.

During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years and through October 22, 2009, there were no disagreements with Seale and Beers, CPAs whether or not resolved, on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to Seale and Beers, CPAs’ satisfaction, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with any report on the Company’s financial statements.

The Company has requested that Seale and Beers, CPAs furnish it with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether it agrees with the above statements. The letter was filed as as an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 of the Company’s  Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on November 3, 2009.

On October 27, 2009, the Company engaged Silberstein Ungar, PLLC as its independent accountant. During the two most recent fiscal years and the interim periods preceding the engagement and through October 27, 2009, the Company has not consulted Silberstein Ungar, PLLC regarding any of the matters set forth in Item 304(a)(2) of Regulation S-K.

VALIDITY OF SECURITIES
The opinion regarding validity of the shares offered herein has been provided by the law offices of Christopher K. Davies, Esq. and has been filed with the Registration Statement.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Company Overview

We were incorporated as “Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc.” on July 24, 2007, in the State of Delaware for the purpose of engaging in mineral properties. On October 19, 2009, we entered into the Exchange Agreement with Diamond Information Institute, whereby we acquired all of the issued and outstanding common stock of Diamond Information Institute and have changed the name of the Company to Bergio International. 

As a result of entering into the Exchange Agreement, we have determined to pursue the business plan of Diamond Information Institute. We are now in the business of designing and manufacturing upscale jewelry.


19


Our Business

We are entering into our 20th year of operations and concentrate on boutique, upscale jewelry stores.  We currently sell our jewelry to approximately 150 independent jewelry retailers across the United States and have spent over $3 million in branding the Bergio name through tradeshows, trade advertising, national advertising and billboard advertising since launching the line in 1995.  We have manufacturing control over our line as a result of having a manufacturing facility in New Jersey as well as subcontracts with facilities in Italy and Bangkok.

It is our intention to establish Bergio International as a holding company for the purpose of acquiring established jewelry design and manufacturing firms who possess branded product lines.  Branded product lines are products and/or collections whereby the jewelry manufacturers have established their products within the industry through advertising in consumer and trade magazines as well as possibly obtaining federally registered trademarks of their products and collections.  This is in line with our strategy and belief that a brand name can create an association with innovation, design and quality which helps add value to the individual products as well as facilitate the introduction of new products.

We intend to acquire design and manufacturing firms throughout the United States and Europe.  If and when we pursue any potential acquisition candidates, we intend to target the top 10% of the world’s jewelry manufactures that have already created an identity and brand in the jewelry industry.  We intend to locate potential candidates through our relationships in the industry and expect to structure the acquisition through the payment of cash, which will most likely be provided from third party financing, as well as our common stock but not cash generated from our operations.  In the event we obtain financing from third parties for any potential acquisitions, Bergio International may agree to issue our common stock in exchange for the capital received.  However, as of the date of this Cur rent Report, we do not have any binding agreements with any potential acquisition candidates or arrangements with any third parties for financing.

Principal Products and Services

We have historically sold our products directly to distributors, retailers and other wholesalers, who then in turn sell their products to consumers through retail stores.  Independent retail jewelers that offer the current Bergio line are not under formal contracts and most sell competing products.
Registered Public Accounting Firm


Our products consist of a wide range of unique styles and designs made from precious metals such as gold, platinum and Karat gold, as well as other precious stones.  We continuously innovate and change our designs based upon consumer trends and as a result of new designs being created we believe we are able to differentiate ourselves and strengthen our brands.  We sell our products to our customers at price points that reflect the market price of the base material plus a markup reflecting our design fee and processing fees.

Each year, most jewelry manufacturers bring new products to market. We believe that we are a trendsetter in jewelry manufacturing.  As a result, we come out with a variety of products throughout the year that we believe have commercial potential to meet what we feel are new trends within the industry.  The “Bergio” designs consist of upscale jewelry that includes white diamonds, yellow diamonds, pearls, and colored stones, in 18K gold, platinum, and palladium.  We currently design and produce approximately 50 to 75 product styles.  Prices for our products range from $400 to $200,000.

Our product range is divided into three fashion lines: (i)18K gold line, (ii) a bridal line, and (iii) a couture and/or one of kind pieces. Our officer and director, Mr. Abajian, consults regularly with the design teams of his Italian manufacturers, which usually results in a constant continuation of new products and sometimes entire lines being developed.  Typically, new products come on line approximately every 3 months and most recently, Bergio International introduced its latest collection “Power in Pink”, which launched in April 2008 and consists of approximately 35 pieces made with pink gold and diamonds.  Depending on the timing and styling at any point in time, our products and collections would fall in one of the various categories shown below:

1.  Whimsical. The whimsical line includes charms, crosses and other “add-on” pieces.

2.  Middle. The proposed middle line will consist of fashion jewelry utilizing colored stones, diamonds and pearls applied to a variety of applications such as necklaces, pendants, earrings, bracelets and rings. The metals that we intend to use for the Middle line include platinum, 18K white & yellow gold.


20



3.  Couture. The Couture line is our most luxurious line, and consists of one of a kind pieces, new showcase products each year, and predominantly utilizes diamonds, platinum and other precious metals and stones of the highest grade and quality available.

4.  Bridal. The Bridal line is our core business. We attempt to stay on the forefront of trends and designs in the bridal market with the latest in wedding sets, engagement rings and wedding bands for both men and women.

Each year, we attempt to expand and/or enhance these lines, while constantly seeking to identify trends that we believe exist in the market for new styles or types of merchandise.  Design and innovation are the primary focus of our manufacturing and we are less concerned with the supply and capacity of raw materials.  Over the last 19 years, Mr. Abajian has been the primary influencer over the Bergio collections.  Mr. Abajian with his contacts, which are located mostly overseas, regularly meets to discuss, conceptualize and develop Bergio’s various products and collections.  When necessary, additional suppliers and design teams can be brought in as the market needs dictate. Management intends to maintain a diverse line of jewelry to mitigate concentration of sales and continuously expand our m arket reach.

Distribution Methods and Marketing

We continue to devote our efforts towards brand development and utilize marketing concepts in an attempt to enhance the marketability of our products.  During the past several years, we have carried out our brand development strategy based on our product quality and design excellence, which is highlighted through our sales personnel.  We have established significant networks and relationships with retailers which allow our products to be promoted and sold nationwide.  We maintain a broad base of customers and concentrate on retailers that sell fashionable and high end jewelry.  We also work with our customers to adjust product strategies based on the customer’s feedback to try and decrease the likelihood of overstocked or undesired products.

We intend to further promote our products and brand by participating in trade shows and various exhibitions, consumer and trade advertisements, billboard advertisements, as well as make specialty appearances in retail stores carrying our products.

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials and Principal Suppliers

Most of the inventory and raw materials we purchase occurs through our manufacturers located in Europe.  The inventory that we directly maintain is based on recent sales and revenues of our products but ultimately is at the discretion of Mr. Abajian and his experience in the industry.  Our inventories are commodities that can be incorporated into future products or can be sold on the open market.  Additionally, we perform physical inventory inspections on a quarterly basis to assess upcoming styling needs and consider the current pricing in metals and stones needed for our products.

We acquire all raw gemstones, precious metals and other raw materials used for manufacturing our products on the open market.  We are not constrained in our purchasing by any contracts with any suppliers and acquire raw material based upon, among other things, availability and price on the open wholesale market.

Approximately 80% of our product line is contracted to manufacturing suppliers in Italy, who then procure the raw materials in accordance with the specifications and designs submitted by Bergio International.  However, the general supply of precious metals and stones used by us can be reasonably forecast even though the prices will fluctuate often.  Any price differentials in the precious metals and stones will typically be passed on to the customer.

For the raw materials not procured by contracted manufacturers, we have approximately 5 suppliers that compete for our business, with our largest gold suppliers being Carrera Casting and Metro Gold.  Most of our precious stones are purchased from C. Mahandra & Sons and EFD.  We do not have any formal agreements with any of our suppliers but have established an ongoing relationship with each of our suppliers.


21


Customers

During the year ended December 31, 2009, Shane & Co. accounted for approximately 5% of our annual sales.  During the year ended December 31, 2008, Shane & Co. accounted for approximately 9.5% of our annual sales.  Previously, we had one customer, Western Stones and Metals, during the year ended December 31, 2007, that accounted for approximately 9% of its annual sales.  

Intellectual Property

Bergio is a federally registered trademarked name that we own.  Since the first trademark of “Bergio” was filed all advertising, marketing, trade shows and overall presentation of our product to the public has prominently displayed this trademark.  As additional lines are designed and added to our products, we may trademark new names to distinguish the particular products and jewelry lines.

Personnel

At December, 2009, we had 3 full-time employees and 2 part-time employees.  Of our current employees, 1 is sales and marketing personnel, 2 are manufacturing and 2 hold administrative and executive positions.  No personnel are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.  Our relationship with our employees is believed to be good.  We intend to use the services of independent consultants and contractors when possible or until we are able to hire personnel in house.

Competition and Market Overview

The jewelry design and manufacturer’s industry is extremely competitive and has low barriers to entry.  We compete with other jewelry design and manufacturers of upscale jewelry to the retail jewelry stores.  There are over 4,000 jewelry design and manufacturer’s companies, several of which have greater experience, brand name recognition and financial resources than Bergio International.

Our management believes that the jewelry industry competes in the global marketplace and therefore must be adaptable to ensure a competitive measure.  Recently the U.S. economy has encountered a slowdown and Bergio International anticipates the U.S. economy will most likely remain weak at least through the end of 2010. Consumer spending for discretionary goods such as jewelry is sensitive to changes in consumer confidence and ultimately consumer confidence is affected by general business considerations in the U.S. economy.  Consumer spending for discretionary spending generally declines during times of falling consumer confidence, which may affect our retail sale of our products.  U.S. consumer confidence reflected these slowing conditions throughout 2008.  The impact of the slowing U.S. economy is not usually known until the second quarter of any given year in our industry thus it is hard to estimate the actual impact the slowing economy will have on our business.

According to the United States Department of Commerce outlook in 2008, the United States apparent consumption of precious metal jewelry was expected to grow over the next few years at a slow but steady rate, before picking up considerably in 2010.  A stronger economy, more spending by the baby boomers and young professionals with an overall trend toward luxury products will lead to future growth.  From 2007 to 2011, apparent consumption of precious metal jewelry is expected to increase by an average of 3.9% per year, totaling $14.0 billion in 2011.  Therefore, we intend to make strong efforts to maintain our brand in the industry through our focus on the innovation and design of our products as well as being able to consolidate and increase cost efficiency when possible through acquisitions.

Environmental Regulation and Compliance

The United States environmental laws do not materially impact our manufacturing operations as a result of having a large majority of our jewelry manufacturing being conducted overseas.  
In fact, approximately 80% of our manufacturing is contracted to quality suppliers in the vicinity of Valenza, Italy with the remaining 20% of setting and finishing work being conducted in Bergio International’s Fairfield, New Jersey facility.  The setting and finishing work done in our New Jersey facility involves the use of precision lasers, which use soap and water rather than soldering.  Also a standard polishing compound is used for the finishing work but it does not have a material impact on our cost and effect of compliance with environmental laws.


22


Government Regulation

Currently, we are subject to all of the government regulations that regulate businesses generally such as compliance with regulatory requirements of federal, state, and local agencies and authorities, including regulations concerning workplace safety, labor relations, and disadvantaged businesses.   In addition, our operations are affected by federal and state laws relating to marketing practices in the retail jewelry industry. We are subject to the jurisdiction of federal, various state and other taxing authorities.  From time to time, these taxing authorities review or audit our business.

Description of Property

Currently, we have a 1,730 square feet design and manufacturing facility located in Fairfield, New Jersey, which is currently being leased until August 31, 2010.  We also rent office space at this facility.  We pay approximately $2,200 per month.  Since a majority of the manufacturing is conducted by sub-contractors in Italy, the current space is presently adequate for the performance of all company functions, which includes minimal manufacturing, design and administrative needs.

Additionally, we anticipate opening additional offices and/or design facilities in other locations as we continue to implement our business plan throughout the United States, when and if any acquisitions are completed in the future.  At the current time, our expansion plans are in the preliminary stages with no formal negotiations being conducted.  Most likely no expansions will take place until additional revenues can be achieved or additional capital can be raised to help offset the costs associated with any expansion.
Litigation

Aside from the following, we are not a party to any pending legal proceeding. We are not aware of any pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us.
On February, 4, 2010, the Superior Court for the State of California approved an Order Approving Stipulation for Settlement of Claim in Socius CG II, Ltd. v. Bergio International Inc.  The order states that in full and final settlement of the claim against us in the total amount of $700,000 -- which Socius CG II, Ltd. (“Socius”) purchased from Columbia Bank arising out of a loan by Columbia Bank to us (through Diamond Information Institute, Inc., our susbdiary) in the principal amount of $700,000 -- we will issue and deliver to Socius 5,700,000 shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, subject to adjustment as set forth in the order.
Effective on April 6, 2010,

To the Board of Directors of

Bergio International, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Fairfield, New Jersey


We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Bergio International, Inc. (the "Company"“Company”) authoriziedas of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the issuancerelated statements of 7,800,000 shares of common stockoperations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the CompanyCompany's management. Our responsibility is to Socius CG II, Ltd. (“Socius). The 7,800,000 shares of common stock were issued to Sociusexpress an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in connection with the settlement of debt in the aggregate amount of $274,000.41 (the “Claim”). The Claim is evidenced by that certain order approving stipulation for settlement of claims dated approximately April 6, 2010 between Socius, as plaintiff, and the Corporation, as defendant, Civil Case No. BC435032 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Central District (the “Order of Stipulation of Settlement”).

The Claim consists of certain debt which was purchased by Socius pursuant to those certain claims purchase agreements representing the following creditors: (i) $21,663.57 in debt due and owing to Carrea Castng Corp.; (ii) $12,8000.00 in debt due and owing to Cybel Trading Corporation; (iii) $174,249.00 in debt due and owing to Moore Stephens PC; (iv) $22,725.00 in debt due and owing to Salerno, Gannon & Angelo PC; (v) $10,140.44 in debt due and owing to Om Color Diamonds Inc.; and (vi) $5,422.40 in debt due and owing to Willis FAJS – Midtown NY. In accordance with the terms and provisionsstandards of the OrderPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of Stipulationmaterial misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of Settlement,its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the Claim is to be satisfied in full bycircumstances, but not for the issuance to Sociuspurpose of 7,800,000 shares of free-trading common stock.
Reports to Security Holders
We are subject toexpressing an opinion on the informational requirementseffectiveness of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we file annual, quarterlyexpress no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and other reportsdisclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and information withsignificant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the Securitiesoverall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bergio International, Inc. as of December 31, 2011 and Exchange Commission. You may read and copy these reports, statements, or other information we file at the SEC's public reference room  which is located at 100 F Street , NE Washington, DC 20549. Our filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services2010, and the Internet worldwide website maintained by the U.S. Securitiesresults of its operations and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.


23



MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The following discussion reflects our plan of operation. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements of Diamond Information Instituteits cash flows for the yearsyear then ended, December 31, 2008in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC


Bingham Farms, Michigan

March 26, 2012










BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

128,238

 

$

4,262

Accounts Receivable - Net

 

 

385,642

 

 

474,212

Inventory

 

 

1,529,394

 

 

1,602,680

Prepaid Expenses

 

 

14,863

 

 

9,353

Other Receivable - Net

 

 

65,000

 

 

175,000

Deferred Financing Costs

 

 

60,689

 

 

--

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Current Assets

 

 

2,183,826

 

 

2,265,507

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and Equipment - Net

 

 

104,597

 

 

118,135

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Offering Costs

 

 

175,000

 

 

--

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate

 

 

5,000

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Other Assets

 

 

180,000

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

$

2,468,423

 

$

2,388,642





The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.






BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

 

$

119,231

 

$

417,144

Bank Lines of Credit - Net

 

 

104,326

 

 

200,866

Convertible Debt, Net

 

 

364,551

 

 

112,069

Current Maturities of Notes Payable

 

 

20,591

 

 

110,060

Current Maturities of Capital Leases

 

 

--

 

 

14,656

Advances from Stockholder - Net

 

 

323,086

 

 

317,601

Derivative Liability

 

 

282,584

 

 

67,988

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

 

 

1,214,369

 

 

1,240,384

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-Term Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes Payable

 

 

31,035

 

 

51,626

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies

 

 

--

 

 

--

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

 

 

1,245,404

 

 

1,292,010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

Series A Preferred Stock - $.001 Par Value, 51 Shares Authorized,

51 and -0- Shares Issued and Outstanding as of

December 31, 2011 and 2010,  respectively (see Note 11)

 

 

--

 

 

--

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock - $.001 Par Value, 200,000,000 Shares Authorized,

41,302,182 and 11,159,574 Shares Issued and Outstanding as of

December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively

 

 

41,302

 

 

11,159

Additional Paid-In Capital

 

 

4,526,165

 

 

4,021,593

Accumulated Deficit

 

 

(3,344,448)

 

 

(2,936,120)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

1,223,019

 

 

1,096,632

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

 

$

2,468,423

 

$

2,388,642



 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.





BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales - Net

 

$

1,621,011

 

$

1,445,570

Cost of Sales

 

 

926,684

 

 

812,831

Gross Profit

 

 

694,327

 

 

632,739

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling Expenses

 

 

412,276

 

 

317,463

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share-Based Services

 

 

--

 

 

242,900

Other

 

 

523,058

 

 

412,951

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total General and Administrative Expenses

 

 

523,058

 

 

655,851

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Operating Expenses

 

 

935,334

 

 

973,314

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from Operations

 

 

(241,007)

 

 

(340,575)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Income [Expense]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Expense

 

 

(66,332)

 

 

(68,240)

Amortization of Debt Discount

 

 

(199,895)

 

 

(120,230)

Change in Fair Value of Derivative

 

 

176,841

 

 

60,206

Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs

 

 

(6,785)

 

 

--

Other

 

 

(71,150)

 

 

--

Gain on Sale of Subsidiary

 

 

--

 

 

225,000

Financing Costs - Share-Based

 

 

--

 

 

(595,160)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Other Income [Expense]

 

 

(167,321)

 

 

(498,424)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Loss

 

 

(408,328)

 

 

(838,999)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Loss Per Common Share - Basic and Diluted

 

$

(0.02)

 

$

(0.10)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding - Basic and Diluted

 

 

21,641,233

 

 

8,718,321




The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.





BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

Total

 

Preferred Stock

Common Stock

Paid-in

Accumulated

Stockholders’

 

Shares

Par Value

Shares

Par Value

Capital

Deficit

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance - January 1, 2010

--

$  --

4,308,625

$  4,308

$  1,675,042

$ (2,097,121)

$  (417,771)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for professional services

--

--

135,499

135

97,925

--

98,060

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for related party debt and accrued interest

--

--

157,142

158

401,602

--

401,760

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for cash ($30,000) and financing costs ($60,000)

--

--

125,000

125

89,875

--

90,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for deferred offering costs

--

--

92,593

93

499,907

--

500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for payment of debt

--

--

1,190,249

1,190

698,809

--

699,999

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for payment of accounts payable

--

--

714,473

714

246,286

--

247,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for share liability

--

--

375,000

375

179,625

--

180,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for accrued compensation

--

--

3,232,020

3,232

67,601

--

70,833

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for debt conversion

--

--

828,973

829

64,921

--

65,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

--

--

--

--

--

(838,999)

(838,999)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance - December 31, 2010

--

$  --

11,159,574

$ 11,159

$  4,021,593

$ (2,936,120)

$  1,096,632

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for accrued compensation

--

--

1,988,054

1,988

21,570

--

23,558

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for debt conversion

--

--

19,236,424

19,237

281,139

--

300,376

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for professional services

--

--

533,553

534

34,147

--

34,681

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for payment of accounts payable

--

--

1,040,133

1,040

30,060

--

31,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for deferred offering cost

--

--

2,136,111

2,136

49,114

--

51,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issuable for deferred offering cost

--

--

5,208,333

5,208

88,542

--

93,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of preferred stock to CEO

51

--

--

--

--

--

--

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

--

--

--

--

--

(408,328)

(408,328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance - December 31, 2011

51

$  --

41,302,182

$ 41,302

$  4,526,165

$ (3,344,448)

$  1,223,019



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.





BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2011

 

2010

Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Loss

 

$

(408,328)

 

$

(838,999)

Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and Amortization

 

 

43,031

 

 

54,282

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

 

12,152

 

 

(50,620)

Amortization of Debt Discount

 

 

199,895

 

 

120,230

Change in Fair Value of Derivative

 

 

(176,841)

 

 

(60,206)

Amortization of Deferred Offering Cost

 

 

6,785

 

 

--

Allowance for Doubtful Account - Receivable Other

 

 

72,500

 

 

--

Share-Based Services

 

 

--

 

 

242,900

Share-Based Financing Cost

 

 

--

 

 

595,160

Gain on Sale of Subsidiary

 

 

--

 

 

(225,000)

Loss on Disposal of Equipment

 

 

--

 

 

18,945

Sales Returns and Allowance Reserve

 

 

--

 

 

(34,808)

Changes in Assets and Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Increase] Decrease in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts Receivable

 

 

76,418

 

 

(81,897)

Inventory

 

 

73,286

 

 

(245,909)

Prepaid Expenses

 

 

(5,510)

 

 

(6,416)

Increase [Decrease] in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

 

 

(160,290)

 

 

147,535

Total Adjustments

 

 

141,426

 

 

474,196

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

 

 

(266,902)

 

 

(364,803)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital Expenditures

 

 

(29,493)

 

 

(28,910)

Proceeds from Sale of Subsidiary

 

 

37,500

 

 

50,000

Payments for Disposal

 

 

--

 

 

(2,145)

Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities

 

 

8,007

 

 

18,945

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase [Decrease] in Cash Overdraft

 

 

--

 

 

(13,717)

Repayments of Bank Lines of Credit - Net

 

 

(59,569)

 

 

(21,098)

Proceeds from Convertible Debt

 

 

566,000

 

 

160,000

Repayments of Notes Payable

 

 

(37,689)

 

 

(36,647)

Advances  from Stockholder - Net

 

 

5,485

 

 

256,018

Repayments of Capital Leases

 

 

(14,656)

 

 

(24,436)

Deferred Financing Costs

 

 

(46,700)

 

 

--

Deferred Offering Costs

 

 

(30,000)

 

 

--

Proceeds from Sale of Stock

 

 

--

 

 

30,000

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities

 

 

382,871

 

 

350,120

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Increase in Cash

 

 

123,976

 

 

4,262

Cash - Beginning of Year

 

 

4,262

 

 

--

Cash - End of Year

 

$

128,238

 

$

4,262


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.




BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Interest

 

$

56,000

 

$

67,000

     Income Taxes

 

$

--

 

$

--

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosures of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt Discount from Fair Value of Embedded Derivative

 

$

391,437

 

$

118,336

Issuance of Common Stock for Deferred Offering Costs

 

$

51,250

 

$

535,160

Issuance of Convertible Debt for Bank Line of Credit

 

$

36,971

 

$

699,999

Issuance of Common Stock for Vendor Payables

 

$

65,781

 

$

247,000

Issuance of Common Stock for Accrued Payroll - Related Party

 

$

23,558

 

$

70,833

Issuance of Common Stock for Convertible Debt and Accrued Interest

 

$

300,376

 

$

65,750

Issuance of Convertible Debt for Notes Payable

 

$

72,371

 

$

--

Issuance of Convertible Debt for Deferred Financing Costs

 

$

20,774

 

$

--

Common Stock Issuable for Deferred Offering Cost

 

$

93,750

 

$

--

Issuance of Common Stock for Stockholder Advances

 

$

--

 

$

401,759

Notes Payable Settled with Inventory

 

$

--

 

$

21,500

Issuance of Common Stock for Share Liability

 

$

--

 

$

180,000















The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.




53



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



[1] Nature of Operations and 2007, and the interim period ended September 30, 2009. This discussion contains forward-looking statements regarding our expected financial position, business and financing plans. These statements involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from the results described in or implied by these forward-looking statements as a resultBasis of various factors, including those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors.”

Presentation


Overview

We were

Nature of Operations - Bergio International, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on July 24, 2007 under the name Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc.  On October 21, 2009, as a result of a Share Exchange Agreement, with Diamond Information Institute, Inc. (“Diamond”) (defined below), the corporate name was changed to Bergio International, Inc. and wethe Company implemented a 12 for 112-for-1 forward stock split of ourits common shares.  Effective December 27, 2010, the Company implemented a 1-for-12 reverse stock split.  All share and per share data has been adjusted to reflect such stock split. Our business now represents the business of Diamond. Diamond had minimal activity until 1995 when it began in the business of jewelry manufacturing under the name Diamond Information Institute (“d/b/a Bergio”).  Since 1995 Diamond has beensplits.  The Company is engaged in the product design, and manufacturemanufacturing, distribution of upscale jewelry. We will continue these ongoing operations. We sell to approximately 150 independentfine jewelry retailers across the United States under the brand name Bergio. Our corporate office is locatedprimarily in Fairfield, New Jersey.

On October 19, 2009, we entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”), with Diamond, a New Jersey corporation. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement we acquired all the issued and outstanding common stock of Diamond, and Diamond became a wholly-owned subsidiary. In addition, we acquired all Diamond’s assets and liabilities effective as of the date of the Exchange Agreement. Per the Exchange Agreement, we issued 31,022,100 (2,585,175 pre-split) shares of our common stock to the shareholders of Diamond (approximately .21884 pre-split shares of Company common stock for each share of Diamond common stock), representing approximately 60% of our aggregate issued and outstanding common stock following the closing of the Exchange Agreement and the Stock Agreement (defined below). The acquisition of Diamond was treated as a recapitalization, and the business of Diamond became our business. At the time of the recapitalization, we were in the exploration development stage and was not engaged in any active business. The accounting rules for recapitalizations require that beginning October 19, 2009, the date of the recapitalization, the balance sheet reflects the consolidated assets and liabilities of Bergio International, Inc. and the equity accounts were recapitalized to reflect the newly capitalized company. The results of operations reflect the operations of Diamond for all periods presented.
In accordance with FASB ASC 805-10-55-11 through 805-10-55-14, we determined that Diamond is the accounting acquirer and treated the acquisition as a reverse merger or recapitalization and accordingly revised the consolidated financial statements and disclosed the accounting treatment in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. We identified Diamond as the accounting acquirer based on the following:
a)           the former stockholders of Diamond acquired 60% ownership of Bergio
b)           the senior management Diamond became the senior management of Bergio
c)           the directors of Diamond became the directors of Bergio
d)           the revenues, assets and operations of Diamond are the sole revenues, assets and operations of Bergio
In conjunction with the Exchange Agreement, on October 20, 2009 we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Agreement”) with certain stockholders of our company (the “former stockholders”). Pursuant to the Stock Agreement, we sold our 100% interest in Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc., an Alberta, Canada corporation (“Alba Canada”) to the former stockholders for nominal consideration and the cancellation of all of the shares of common stock of our company then owned by the former stockholders.  As a result, a total of 39,720,000 (3,310,000 pre-split) shares were cancelled.

Critical Accounting Policies

Accounts Receivable.  Management periodically performs a detailed review of amounts due from customers to determine if accounts receivable balances are impaired based on factors affecting the collectability of those balances.  Management has provided an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $86,000 at September 30, 2009 and $80,000 at December 31, 2008.

24



Long-Lived Assets.  In accordance with current Accounting Principles long-lived tangible assets subject to depreciation or amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured by the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its fair value as determined by an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows.  As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by management in their impairment analyses may not be achieved.

Revenue Recognition. The Company’s management recognizes revenue when realized or realizable and earned.  In connection with revenue recorded, the Company establishes a sales returns and allowances reserve for anticipated merchandise to be returned.  The estimated percentage of sales to be returned is based on the Company’s historical experience of returned merchandise. Also, management calculates an estimated gross profit margin on returned merchandise deriving a cost for the anticipated returned merchandise also based on the Company’s historical operations.

The Company’s sole revenue producing activity as a manufacturer and distributor of upscale jewelry is affected by movement in fashion trends and customer desire for new designs, varying economic conditions affecting consumer spending and changing product demand by retailers affecting their desired inventory levels.

Therefore, management’s estimation process for merchandise returns can result in actual amounts differing from those estimates.  This estimation process is susceptible to variation and uncertainty due to the challenges faced by management to comprehensively discern all conditions affecting future merchandise returns whether prompted by fashion, the economy or customer relationships.  Ultimately, management believes historical factors provide the best indicator of future conditions based on the Company’s responsiveness to changes in fashion trends, the cyclical nature of the economy in conjunction with the number of years in business and consistency and longevity of its customer mix.
Overview of Our Current Operations

Our products consist of a wide range of unique styles and designs made from precious metals such as, gold, platinum, and Karat gold, as well as diamonds and other precious stones.  We have approximately 50 to 75 product styles in our inventory, with prices ranging from $400 to $200,000.  Additionally, we have manufacturing control over our line as a result of having a manufacturing facility in New Jersey as well as subcontracts with facilities in Italy and Bangkok.
We intend to acquire design and manufacturing firms throughout the United States and Europe.  If and when we pursue any potential acquisition candidates, we intend to targetis headquartered from its corporate office in Fairfield, New Jersey.  Based on the top 10%nature of the world’s jewelry manufactures that have already created an identity and brand in the jewelry industry.  We intend to locate potential candidates through our relationships in the industry and expect to structure the acquisition through the payment of cash, which will most likely be provided from third party financing, as well asoperations, the Company’s common stock and not cash generated from the our operations. In the event, we obtain financing from third parties for any potential acquisitions; we may agree to issue the Company’s common stock in exchange for the capital received.
In September 2009, we executed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Mario Panelli & C., s.a.s. (the “Seller”), an Italian company, to acquire substantially all of the assets of the Seller at an amount equal to 100% of the book value of such assets, as defined in the Agreement. The Agreement is pending our closing on financing.
Our management believes that the jewelry industry competes in the global marketplace and therefore must be adaptable to ensure a competitive measure.  Recently the U.S. economy has encountered a slowdown and we anticipate the U.S. economy will most likely remain weak at least through most of 2010.  Consumer spending for discretionary goods such as jewelry is sensitive to changes in consumer confidence and ultimately consumer confidence is affected by general business considerations in the U.S. economy.  Consumer spending for discretionary spending generally decline during times of falling consumer confidence, which may affect the retail sales of our products.  U.S. consumer confidence reflected these slowing conditions during the last quarter of 2007 and has been carried forward throughout the year of 2009. Therefore, we intend to make strong efforts to maintain our brand in the industry through our focus on the innovation and design of our products as well as being able to consolidate and increase cost efficiency when possible through acquisitions.

25


Result of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
The following income and operating expenses tables summarize selected items from the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008.
INCOME:

  Years Ended December 31,  Increase/ 
  2009  2008  (Decrease) 
          
Sales – net $975,354  $1,385,620   (30%)
             
Cost of Sales  690,708   847,976   (19%)
             
Gross Profit $284,646  $537,644   (47%)
             
Gross Profit as a Percentage of Revenue  29%  39%  (26%)


Sales
Net sales for the year ended December 31, 2009 were $975,354 compared to $1,385,620 for the year ended December 31, 2008.  This resulted in a decrease of approximately $410,000 or 30% from the comparable period.  The decrease is primarily due to the lack of consumer confidence in the U.S. economy which began in 2008. Such lack of confidence has resulted in a slowdown in discretionary spending which has continued to negatively affect our sales from the second half of 2008 throughout fiscal 2009.
Typically, revenues experiencecycle experiences significant seasonal volatility inwith the jewelry industry.  The first two quarters of any giventhe year typically represent approximatelyrepresenting 15%-25% - 25% of total year revenues, based on historic results.  The holiday buying season duringannual sales and the lastremaining two quarters of every year typically account forrepresenting the remainderremaining portion of annual sales.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $690,708 a decrease of approximately $157,000, or 19%, from $847,976 for the year ended December 31, 2008.  Although total cost of sales decreased, which was reflective of the decrease in sales, as a percentage of sales costs increased due to higher commodity prices in 2009.
Gross Profit:
During the year ended December 31, 2009, our gross profit as a percentage of sales was 29%, compared to a gross profit as a percentage of sales of 39% for the year ended December 31, 2008.  Our decreased gross profit during 2009 was a result of higher commodity prices.



26


OPERATING EXPENSES:

  Years Ended December 31,  Increase/ 
  2009  2008  (Decrease) 
          
Selling Expenses $212,709  $368,664   (42%)
             
Total General and Administrative Expenses  576,708   1,262,623   (54%)
             
Total Operating Expenses $789,417  $1,631,287   (52%)
             
Net Loss $(597,725) $(1,106,856)  (46%)


Selling Expenses
Total selling expenses were $212,709 for the year ended December 31, 2009, which was approximately a 42% decrease from $368,664 for the year ended December 31, 2008.  Selling expenses include advertising, trade show expenses and selling commissions.  The decrease in selling expenses during the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008 was a result of decreased advertising and travel expenses under the Company’s cost saving programs implemented in 2008.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $576,708 for the year ended December 31, 2009 versus $1,262,623 for the year ended December 31, 2008.  The decrease in general and administrative expenses is due primarily to a decrease in professional fees due to certain filings in 2008 related to being a publicly-traded company.  Included in professional fees in 2008 was a non-cash charge related to stock based compensation of $450,000, which decreased to $48,000 in 2009.  Also included in general and administrative expenses In 2008 were share-based compensation of $317,500 and non-cash stock based expense for computer services in the amount of $14,000. Total non-cash stock based compensation was $781,500 in 2008 compared to $68,000 in 2009.
Loss from Operations
During the year ended December 31, 2009, we had a loss from operations totaling $504,771 which was a decrease of approximately $589,000 (54%) from the loss of $1,093,643 for the year ended December 31, 2008.  The primary contributing factor for the decrease in our loss from operations was reductions in selling and general and administrative expenses, as discussed above.
Other Expense / Income
Other Expense / Income is comprised primarily of interest incurred on bank lines of credit, corporate credit cards, term loans and capital leases in connection with operations related to manufacturing and indirect operating expenses offset by miscellaneous income.  Interest expense decreased from $103,715 in 2008 to $93,350 in 2009 primarily due to lower interest rates on credit lines and credit cards.
Income Tax (Benefit) Provision
The Company reported an income tax benefit of $89,133 for the year ended December 31, 2008, which resulted from the utilization of loss carryforwards to offset taxable income generated from our change in accounting method from cash to accrual basis in 2008. There was no income tax benefit in 2009. The decrease in the tax benefit is attributable to the valuation allowance of 100% of our deferred tax asset.

27



Net Loss
The Company incurred a net loss of $597,725 for the year ended December 31, 2009 versus a net loss of $1,106,856 for the year ended December 31, 2008.  This was a decrease of $509,000 (46%) in our net loss from the comparable period.  Our decrease in net loss is directly attributable to our reduction in selling and general administrative expenses which we resulted from our cost reduction measures implemented in 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table summarizes working capital at December 31, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008.

 December 31, Increase/ 
 2009 2008 Decrease 
       
Current Assets $1,722,903  $2,079,321  $(356,418)
             
Current Liabilities $2,100,386  $1,996,988  $103,398 
             
Working Capital $(377,483) $82,333  $(459,816)


As of December 31, 2009, we had a cash overdraft of $13,717, compared to a cash overdraft of $7,345 at December 31, 2008.  Over the next twelve months we believe that our existing capital combined with cash flow from operations will be sufficient to sustain our current operations. It is anticipated that we will need to sell additional equity and/or debt securities in the event we locate potential mergers and/or acquisitions.
The Company has experienced a decrease in accounts receivable due to current decline in macro economic conditions of the country which has led to a decline in overall spending in retail and luxury products.
Subsequent to year end, we entered into various debt restructuring and financing agreements as follows:
In February 2010, through an agreement with Socius CG II, Ltd (“Socius”), we settled a $700,000 payment of our credit line with Columbia Bank with the issuance of 5,700,000 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment) to Socius.
In January 2010, we finalized a securities purchase agreement with Tangiers Investors, LP (“Tangiers”) pursuant to which at our discretion we can periodically sell to Tangiers shares of common stock up to a maximum purchase of $25,000,000.  The selling price will be 88% of the lowest volume weighted average price, as defined in the agreement, for the five days immediately following the notice of sale date. In addition, we issued Tangiers 1,111,111 shares of common stock valued at $500,000 for a one-time commitment fee.
In January 2010, through two agreements with Caesar Capital Group, LLC (Caesar”), we settled approximately $250,000 and $152,000 of stockholder loans through the issuance of 1,086,956 and 798,731 shares of common stock to Caesar.
In March 2010, we settled approximately $247,000 in payables with the issuance of 7,800,000 shares of common stock to Socius and we continue to work with Socius on the settlement of an additional approximate $750,000 of debt through the issuance of equity securities.
Accounts receivable at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $341,695 and $713,194, respectively, representing a decrease of 52%.  We typically offer our customers 60, 90 or 120 day payment terms on sales, depending upon the product mix purchased.  When setting terms with our customers, we also consider the term of the relationship with individual customers and management’s assessed credit risk of the respective customer, and may at management’s discretion, increase or decrease payment terms based on those considerations.  The decrease in accounts receivable from December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2009 is primarily attributable to the decreased sales.

28



Inventory at December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $1,378,271 and $1,326,989, respectively. Our management seeks to maintain a very consistent inventory level that it believes is commensurate with current market conditions and manufacturing requirements related to anticipated sales volume.  We historically do not have an inventory reserve for slow moving or obsolete products due to the nature of our inventory of precious metals and stones, which are commodity-type raw materials and rise in value based on quoted market prices established in actively trade markets.  This allows for us to resell or recast these materials into new products and/or designs as the market evolves.
Accounts payable and accrued expenses at December 31, 2009 were $587,443 compared to $446,892 at December 31, 2008, which represents a 31% increase.  The increase was a result of payables we were negotiating which were settled in the subsequent period.
Bank Lines of Credit and Notes Payable
Our indebtedness is comprised of various bank credit lines, term loans, capital leases and credit cards intended to provide capital for the ongoing manufacturing of our jewelry line, in advance of receipt of the payment from our retail distributors.  As of December 31, 2009, we had 2 outstanding term loans and two demand notes.  The demand notes bear interest of 10% and are in the amount of $11,500 and $10,000.  One of the term loans is for $100,000 with Leaf Financial Corp., which is payable in monthly installments and matures in December 2013.  The note bears an annual interest rate of 9.47% and as of December 31, 2009, there was an outstanding balance of $83,074.  We also have a $300,000 term loan with JPMorgan Chase, which is payable in monthly installments and matures in June 2011. 60; The note bears an annual interest rate of 7.60% and as of December 31, 2009 there was an outstanding balance of $115,259.  Both of these notes are collateralized by our assets as well as a personal guarantee by our CEO, Berge Abajian.
Additionally, in November 2009, we issued a 7% secured convertible debenture in the amount of $25,000 to Tangiers Capital, LLC.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on August 16, 2010 (or at an earlier date) or is convertible into shares of our common stock, as defined in the Agreement.
In addition to the notes payable, we utilize bank lines of credit to support working capital needs.  As of December 31, 2009, we had 2 lines of credit.  One bank line of credit is for $700,000 with Columbia Bank and requires minimum monthly payment of interest only.  The interest is calculated at the bank’s prime rate plus 0.75%.  As of December 31, 2008, we had an outstanding balance of $699,999 at an effective annual interest rate of 4.00%.  Additionally, we have a bank line of credit of $55,000 with JPMorgan Chase Bank, which also requires a monthly payment of $500 and matures in June 2011.  The interest rate is calculated at the bank’s prime rate plus 0.75%.  As of December 31, 2009, we had an outstanding balance of $44,380 at an effective annual interes t rate of 4.00%.  Each credit line renews annually and is collateralized by our assets as well as a personal guarantee by our CEO, Berge Abajian.
In addition to the bank lines of credit and term loans, we have a number of various unsecured credit cards.  These credit cards require minimal monthly payments of interest only and as of December 31, 2009 have interest rates ranging from 3.99% to 24.90%.  As of December 31, 2009, we have outstanding balances of $177,584.
Satisfaction of our cash obligations for the next 12 months.
A critical component of our operating plan impacting our continued existence is to efficiently manage the production of our jewelry lines and successfully develop new lines through our Company or through possible acquisitions and/or mergers. Our ability to obtain capital through additional equity and/or debt financing, and joint venture partnerships will also be important to our expansion plans. In the event we experience any significant problems assimilating acquired assets into our operations or cannot obtain the necessary capital to pursue our strategic plan, we may have to reduce the growth of our operations. This may materially impact our ability to increase revenue and continue our growth.
Over the next twelve months we believe that our existing capital combined with cash flow from operations will be sufficient to sustain our current operations.  We will use the funds available to us under the Securities Purchase Agreement to fund acquisitions.

29



[2] Summary of product and research and development that we will perform for the termSignificant Accounting Policies


Use of our plan.

We are not anticipating significant research and development expenditures in the near future.
Expected purchase or saleEstimates - The preparation of plant and significant equipment.
We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any plant or significant equipment; as such items are not required by us at this time.
Significant changes in the number of employees.
We currently have 3 full-time employees and 2 part-time employees.  Of our current employees, 1 is sales and marketing personnel, 2 are manufacturing and 2 hold administrative and executive positions.  None of our employees are subject to any collective bargaining agreements.  We do not anticipate a significant change in the number of full time employees over the next 12 months.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, results or operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is deemed material.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company prepares its financial statements in accordanceconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparing financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principlesAmerica requires the Companymanagement to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosuresdisclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as ofat the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenuerevenues and expenses during the reportedreporting period.
 Actual results could differ from those estimates.


Revenue Recognition - Revenue is recognized upon the shipment of products to customers with the price to the buyer being fixed and determinable and collectability reasonably assured


Cash and Cash Equivalents - Cash equivalents are comprised of certain highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased.  The Company did not have any cash equivalents on hand at December 31, 2011 and 2010.


Accounts Receivable.  Management periodically performs a detailed review - Accounts receivable is generated from sales of amountsfine jewelry to retail outlets throughout the United States.  At December 31, 2011 and 2010, accounts receivable were substantially comprised of balances due from customers to determine ifretailers.


An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided against accounts receivable balances are impaired based on factors affectingfor amounts management believes may be uncollectible.  The Company determines the collectabilityadequacy of those balances.  Management has providedthis allowance by regularly reviewing the composition of its accounts receivable aging and evaluating individual customer receivables, considering the customer’s financial condition, credit history and current economic circumstance.  As of December 31, 2011, and 2010 an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $97,545$47,939 and $35,787, respectively has been provided.


Inventories - Inventory consists primarily of finished goods and is valued at the lower of cost or market.  Cost is determined using the weighted average method and average cost is recomputed after each inventory purchase or sale.


Concentrations of Credit Risk - Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and accounts receivables.  The Company places its cash with high credit quality financial institutions.  The Company, from time to time, maintains balances in financial institutions beyond the insured amounts.  At December 31, 2009.

2011 and 2010, the Company had no cash balances beyond the federally insured amounts.




54



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets into which the Company’s services are provided, as well as their dispersion across many different geographical areas.  As is characteristic of the Company’s business and of the jewelry industry generally, the Company extends its customers seasonal credit terms.  The carrying amount of receivables approximates fair value.  The Company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers and believes its credit risk exposure on accounts receivable is limited.  Based on management’s review of accounts receivable, an allowance for doubtful accounts has been recorded for the years ending December 31, 2011 and 2010.  The Company does not require collateral to support these financial instruments.


Property and Equipment and Depreciation - Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.  Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from five (5) to seven (7) years.


Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred whereas expenditures for renewals and improvements that extend the useful life of the assets are capitalized.  Upon the sale or retirement, the cost and the related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the respective accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reported within the Statements of Operations in the period of disposal.


Long-Lived Assets. - In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, long-lived tangible assets subject to depreciation or amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  If an asset is determined to be impaired, the loss is measures by the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over itsassets exceed their fair value as determined by an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows.  


Losses on assets held for disposal are recognized when management has approved and committed to a plan to dispose of the assets, and the assets are available for disposal.


Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The Company follows guidance issued by the FASB on “Fair Value Measurements” for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.  This guidance establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to existing generally accepted accounting principles that require the use of fair value measurements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements.


The FASB defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  Additionally, the FASB requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.


These inputs are prioritized below:


Level 1:

Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.


Level 2:

Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.


Level 3:

Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the use of the reporting entity’s own assumptions.





55



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



The Company discloses the estimated fair value for all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair value.  As these factors of December 31, 2011, the fair value of short-term financial instruments including cash overdraft, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximates book value due to their short-term maturity.  The fair value of property and equipment is estimated to approximate its net book value. 

The following are difficultthe major categories of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, using quoted prices in active markets for identical liabilities (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Total

 

Derivatives Liabilities

 

$

--

 

 

$

282,584

 

 

$

--

 

 

$

282,584

 

 

$

--

 

 

$

67,988

 

 

$

--

 

 

$

67,988

 


In addition, the FASB issued, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.  This guidance expands opportunities to predictuse fair value measurements in financial reporting and permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  The Company did not elect the fair value option for any of its qualifying financial instruments.


Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates - Investments in unconsolidated affiliates, in which the Company owns less than 20% or otherwise does not exercise significant influence, are subjectstated at cost.  At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had an investment in which the Company owned less than 1% interest in an unconsolidated affiliate and therefore the investment is carried at cost.


Deferred Offering and Deferred Financing Costs - We defer certain costs associated with financing activities related to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by managementissuance of equity securities (deferred offering costs) and debt securities (deferred financing costs).  These costs consist primarily of legal, banking and other professional fees related to the transactions. Upon successful completion of the offering of equity securities, deferred offering costs are recorded as a reduction of the net proceeds in their impairment analyses maypaid in capital. If the offering is not successful, such costs will be achieved.

expensed.  Deferred financing costs are amortized over the life of the related debt.


Equity-Based Compensation. - The Company accounts for equity based compensation transactions with employees under the provisions of ASC Topic No. 718, “Compensation;“Compensation: Stock Compensation” (“Topic No. 718”).  Topic No. 718 requires the recognition of the fair value of equity-based compensation in net income. The fair value of common stock issued for compensation is measured at the market price on the date of grant.  The fair value of the Company’s equity instruments, areother than common stocks, is estimated using a Black-Scholes option valuation model.  This model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions and elections including expected stock price volatility and the estimated life of each award. In addition, the calculation of equity-based compensation costs requires that the Company estimate the number of awards that will be forfeited during the vesting period.  The fair value of equity-based awards granted to employees is amortized over the vesting period of the award and the Company elected to use the straight-line method for awards granted after the adoption of Topic No. 718.



30


The Company accounts for equity based transactions with non-employees under the provisions of ASC Topic No. 505-50, “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees” (“Topic No. 505-50”).  Topic No. 505-50 establishes that equity-based payment transactions with non-employees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, which everwhichever is more reliably measurable.  When the equity instrument is utilized for measurement theThe fair value of common stock issued for payments to non-employees is measured at the market price on the date of grant.  The fair value of equity instrumentinstruments, other than common stock, is estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model.  In general, the Company recognizes an asset or expense in the same manner as if it was to receive cash for the goods or services instead of paying with or using the equity instrument.

Revenue Recognition. The Company’s management recognizes revenue when realized or realizable and earned.  In connection with revenue recorded, the Company establishes a sales returns and allowances reserve for anticipated merchandise to be returned.  The estimated percentage of sales to be returned is based on the Company’s historical experience of returned merchandise as prescribed by promulgated accounting principles. Also, management calculates an estimated gross profit margin on returned merchandise deriving a cost for the anticipated returned merchandise also based on the Company’s historical operations.
The Company’s sole revenue producing activity as a manufacturer and distributor of upscale jewelry is affected by movement in fashion trends and customer desire for new designs, varying economic conditions affecting consumer spending and changing product demand by retailers affecting their desired inventory levels.
Therefore, management’s estimation process for merchandise returns can result in actual amounts differing from those estimates.  This estimation process is susceptible to variation and uncertainty due to the challenges faced by management to comprehensively discern all conditions affecting future merchandise returns whether prompted by fashion, the economy or customer relationships.  Ultimately, management believes historical factors provide the best indicator of future conditions based on the Company’s responsiveness to changes in fashion trends, the cyclical nature of the economy in conjunction with the number of years in business and consistency and longevity of its customer mix.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
On July 1, 2009, the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) became the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) officially recognized source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles applicable to all public and non-public non-governmental entities, superseding existing FASB, AICPA, EITF and related literature. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other accounting literature is considered non-authoritative. The switch to the ASC affects the away companies refer to U.S. GAAP in financial statements and accounting policies. Citing particular content in the ASC involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content through the Topic, Subtopic, Section and Paragraph structure.
FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” New authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 820,”Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” affirms that the objective of fair value when the market for an asset is not active is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction, and clarifies and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset when the market for that asset is not active. ASC Topic 820 requires an entity to base its conclusion about whether a transaction was not orderly on the weight of the evidence. The new accounting guidance amended prior guidance to expand certain disclosure requirements. The Company adopted the new a uthoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 820 during the first quarter of 2009. Adoption of the new guidance did not significantly impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.



31

56




Further new authoritative accounting guidance (Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-5) under ASC Topic 820 provides guidance for measuring the fair value of a liability in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available. In such instances, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value utilizing a valuation technique that uses (i) the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, (ii) quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets, or (iii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the existing principles of ASC Topic 820, such as an income approach or market approach. The new authoritative accounting guidance also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The forgoing new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 820 will be effective for the Company’s consolidated financial statements beginning October 1, 2009 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events.” New authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events,” establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued. ASC Topic 855 defines (i) the period after the balance sheet date during which a reporting entity’s management should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (ii) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and (iii) the disclosures an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 855 became effective for the Company’s financial statements for periods ending after June 15, 2009.  Effective February 24, 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-09, “Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements” which revised certain disclosure requirements. ASU No. 2010-09 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The company evaluated subsequent events, which are events or transactions that occurred after December 31, 2009 through the issuance of the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Management does not believe that any other recently issued but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have an effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Except as follows, none of our directors or executive officers, nor any proposed nominee for election as a director, nor any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to all of our outstanding shares, nor any members of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings, and in-laws) of any of the foregoing persons has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction over the last two years or in any presently proposed transaction which, in either case, has or will materially affect us.
The Company receives periodic advances from its principal stockholder based upon the Company's cash flow needs. As of December 31, 2009, $ 440,521.16 was due to the shareholder No terms for repayment have been established.  As a result, the amount is classified as a Current Liability.
In 2007, the Company hired an information technology company to provide consultation and technical support related to certain software applications and technology infrastructure.  The information technology company is also a shareholder of the Company with a total ownership interest of less than 1%.  During 2007, common stock issued to this information technology company in connection with services rendered or, to be performed in future periods totaled $100,000 or 100,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $1 per share. Of the total, $45,000 related to future services and was recorded as deferred compensation.



32


MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”), which is sponsored by FINRA. The OTCBB is a network of security dealers who buy and sell stock. The dealers are connected by a computer network that provides information on current "bids" and "asks", as well as volume information. As of the date of the Acquisition, our shares were quoted on the OTCBB under the symbol “BRGO”

The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid quotations for our common stock for each of the periods indicated as reported by the OTCBB. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2009 
Quarter Ended High $  Low $ 
December 31, 2009  0.92   0.44 
September 30, 2009  0.00   0.00 
June 30, 2009  0.00   0.00 
March 31, 2009  0.00   0.00 


Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2008 
Quarter Ended High $  Low $ 
December 31, 2008  0.00   0.00 
September 30, 2008  0.00   0.00 
June 30, 2008  0.00   0.00 
    March 31, 2008  0.00   0.00 

(b)   Holders.  As of December 31 2009, our Common Stock was held by approximately 39 shareholders of record. Our transfer agent is Empire Stock Transfer, located at 2470 St. Rose Pkwy, Suite 304 Henderson, NV 89074.  Phone: (702) 818-5898. The transfer agent is responsible for all record-keeping and administrative functions in connection with the common shares of stock.

(c)   Dividends.  We have never declared or paid a cash dividend. There are no restrictions on the common stock or otherwise that limit our ability to pay cash dividends if declared by the Board of Directors. We do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
(d)  Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Overview
The following is a discussion of our program for compensating our named executive officers and directors. Currently, we do not have a compensation committee, and as such, our board of directors is responsible for determining the compensation of our named executive officers.


33


Compensation Program Objectives and Philosophy
The primary goals of our policy of executive compensation are to attract and retain the most talented and dedicated executives possible, to assure that our executives are compensated effectively in a manner consistent with our strategy and competitive practice and to align executives compensation with the achievement of our short- and long-term business objectives.
The board of directors considers a variety of factors in determining compensation of executives, including their particular background and circumstances, such as their training and prior relevant work experience, their success in attracting and retaining savvy and technically proficient managers and employees, increasing our revenues, broadening our product line offerings, managing our costs and otherwise helping to lead our Company through a period of rapid growth.
In the near future, we expect that our board of directors will form a compensation committee charged with the oversight of executive compensation plans, policies and programs of our Company and with the full authority to determine and approve the compensation of our chief executive officer and make recommendations with respect to the compensation of our other executive officers. We expect that our compensation committee will continue to follow the general approach to executive compensation that we have followed to date, rewarding superior individual and company performance with commensurate cash compensation.
Employment Agreements
We did not have any employment agreements with our employees for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Following the reporting period, however, on February 28, 2010, we entered into an employment agreement (the “Agreement”) with Berge Abajian, regarding Mr. Abajian’s continued service as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Abajian has served as our Chief Executive Officer since October 2009 when he was appointed to the position as part of our acquisition of Diamond Information Institute, Inc., a publicly traded company also listed on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board.  Prior to joining us, Mr. Abajian served as the Chief Executive Officer of Diamond Information Institute from 1988 to October 2009.
The material terms of Mr. Abajian’s employment are set forth below.
Term:
5 year term, with automatic one (1) year renewals.
Base Salary:
$175,000 annualized
Bonuses:
Annual cash and equity bonus based on profits of the Company.
Non-Compete Agreement:
Mr. Abajian’s agreement contains a two (2) year non-solicitation  clause and a confidentiality clause.
Severance:In the event Mr. Abajian is terminated as a result of death or for cause he will be entitled to receive (a) a lump sum amount equal to the sum of three (3) months of his annual base salary determined at the time of separation, (b) any bonus owed for the year of termination, (c) reimbursement for expenses for the year.
Stock-Based Awards under the Equity Incentive Plan
We have adopted an unfunded Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan to compensate our Chief Executive Officer.  Under this Plan, we are not required to reserve funds for compensation, and we are only obligated to pay compensation when and if funds are available.  Any amounts due but unpaid automatically accrue to deferred compensation. The Plan has the option to be renewed annually at the discretion of our company. While unfunded and non-recourse, for compliance with GAAP this is disclosed as an accrued expense on the balance sheet.


34


Retirement Benefits
Currently, we do not provide any company sponsored retirement benefits to any employee, including the named executive officers.
Perquisites
We have historically, provided only modest perquisites to our named executive officers. We do not view perquisites as a significant element of our compensation structure, but do believe that perquisites can be useful in attracting, motivating and retaining the executive talent for which we compete. It is expected that our historical practices regarding perquisites will continue and will be subject to periodic review by our by our board of directors.
Summary Compensation Table
The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our executive officers for all services rendered in all capacities to us for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE 
Name and
principal position
Year 
Salary
($)
  
Bonus
($)
  
Option
Awards
($)
  
 
Stock Awards
($)
  
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
  
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
  
All Other
Compensation
($)
  
Total
($)
 
Berge Abajian
Chief Executive Officer, President, Principal Accounting Officer
2009  13,413   0   0   20,000(1)  0   0   17,856(2)  51,269 
2008  6,242   0   0   50,000(1)  0   0   25,496(2)  81,738 
Owen Gibson, Former Chief Executive Officer, President, Principal Accounting Officer
2009  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
2008  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
(1)   The amounts shown in this column reflect the expense recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, in accordance with FAS 123(R). Mr. Abajian was issued 100,000 shares of common stock as compensation for serving on Diamond Information Institute's Board of Directors for the 2007 and 2008 fiscal years.  On February 11, 2009, Mr. Abajian was issued another 50,000 shares of common stock as compensation in advance for serving on Diamond Information Institute's Board of Directors for the upcoming 2009 fiscal year.  None of the shares owned by Mr. Abajian have any registration rights attached to them.
(2)   Other compensation was made up of Mr. Abajian’s car expense and health insurance expenses. 
Stock Option Plans
We did not have a stock option plan as of December 31, 2009.
Stock Option Grants
We have not granted any stock options to the executive officers or directors since our inception.


35


Audited Financial Statements:














36



Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business Advisors
Phone (248) 203-0080
Fax (248) 281-0940
30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175
Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586
www.sucpas.com
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of
Bergio International, Inc.
Fairfield, New Jersey

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Bergio International, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The consolidated financial statements of Bergio International, Inc. (formerly known as Diamond Information Institute, Inc.) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 were audited by other auditors whose report dated March 23, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a te st basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bergio International, Inc. as of December 31, 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC

Bingham Farms, Michigan
March 30, 2010






F-1 
37



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Bergio International, Inc. formerly, Diamond
Information Institute, Inc.
Fairfield, New Jersey

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Bergio International, Inc., formerly, Diamond Information Institute, Inc. as of December 31, 2008, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Bergio International, Inc., formerly, Diamond Information Institute, Inc. as of December 31, 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.


/s/ MSPC
Certified Public Accountants and Advisors,
A Professional Corporation


Cranford, New Jersey
March 23, 2009





F-2 
38


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Assets:      
Current Assets:      
Accounts Receivable – Net $341,695  $713,194 
Inventory  1,378,271   1,326,989 
Prepaid Expenses  2,937   39,138 
         
Total Current Assets  1,722,903   2,079,321 
         
Property and Equipment – Net  160,307   160,983 
         
Other Assets:        
Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate  5,000   5,000 
         
Total Assets $1,888,210  $2,245,304 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.









F-3 
39


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit):      
Liabilities      
Current Liabilities:      
Cash Overdraft $13,717  $7,345 
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses  587,443   446,892 
Bank Lines of Credit – Net  883,583   910,449 
Convertible Debt, Net of Discount of $9,075  15,925   -- 
Current Maturities of Notes Payable  69,335   82,015 
Current Maturities of Capital Leases  22,375   23,402 
Advances from Stockholder – Net  463,342   394,532 
Sales Returns and Allowances Reserve  34,808   132,353 
Derivative Liability  9,858   -- 
         
Total Current Liabilities  2,100,386   1,996,988 
         
Long-Term Liabilities        
Bank Lines of Credit  38,380   -- 
Notes Payable  150,498   97,270 
Capital Leases  16,717   39,092 
         
Total Long-Term Liabilities  205,595   136,362 
         
Commitments and Contingencies  --   -- 
         
Total Liabilities  2,305,981   2,133,350 
         
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)        
Common Stock - $.001 Par Value, 75,000,000 Shares Authorized, 51,703,500 and 60,401,400
Shares Issued and Outstanding as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively
  51,703   60,401 
Additional Paid-In Capital  1,627,647   1,550,949 
Accumulated Deficit  (2,097,121)  (1,499,396)
         
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)  (417,771)  111,954 
         
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) $1,888,210  $2,245,304 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4 
40


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


  Years Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Sales – Net $975,354  $1,385,620 
Cost of Sales  690,708   847,976 
Gross Profit  284,646   537,644 
         
Selling Expenses  212,709   368,664 
         
General and Administrative Expenses        
Share-Based Compensation  20,000   317,500 
Common Stock Issued for Professional Services  48,000   450,000 
Other  508,708   495,123 
         
Total General and Administrative Expenses  576,708   1,262,623 
         
Total Operating Expenses  789,417   1,631,287 
         
Loss from Operations  (504,771)  (1,093,643)
         
Other Income [Expense]        
Interest Expense  (93,350)  (103,715)
Other Income  1,179   1,369 
Amortization of Debt Discount  (1,815)  -- 
Change in Fair Value of Derivative  1,032   -- 
         
Total Other Income [Expense]  (92,954)  (102,346)
         
Loss Before Income Tax Benefit  (597,725)  (1,195,989)
         
Income Tax Benefit  --   (89,133)
         
Net Loss $(597,725) $(1,106,856)
         
Net Loss Per Common Share - Basic and Diluted $(0.01) $(0.02)
         
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding – Basic and Diluted  51,703,500   60,401,400 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5 
41



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)


  Common Stock  
Additional
Paid-in
  Deferred  Accumulated  
Total
Stockholders’
 
  Shares  Par Value  Capital  Compensation  Deficit  Equity(Deficit) 
                   
Balance January 1, 2008  60,401,400  $60,401  $(25,056)  --  $(959) $34,386 
                         
Recapitalization - reverse acquisition into public shell and sale of Alba Canada  --   --   807,905   (14,307)  (391,581)  402,017 
                         
Issuance of common stock of subsidiary for professional services  --   --   450,000   --   --   450,000 
                         
Issuance of common stock of subsidiary for compensation  --   --   317,500   --   --   317,500 
                         
Issuance of common stock of subsidiary for cash  --   --   600   --   --   600 
                         
Amortization of deferred compensation of subsidiary  --   --   --   14,307   --   14,307 
                         
Net Loss  --   --   --   --   (1,106,856)  (1,106,856)
                         
Balance - December 31, 2008 - Forward  60,401,400  $60,401  $1,550,949   --  $(1,499,396) $111,954 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


F-6 
42


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, IMC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)


  Common Stock  
Additional
Paid-in
  Deferred  Accumulated  
Total
Stockholders’
 
  Shares  Par Value  Capital  Compensation  Deficit  Equity(Deficit) 
                   
Balance - December 31, 2008 -Forwarded  60,401,400  $60,401  $1,550,949   --  $(1,499,396) $111,954 
                         
Recapitalization - reverse acquisition into public shell  31,022,100   31,022   (31,022)  --   --   -- 
                         
Issuance of common stock of subsidiary for professional services  --   --   48,000   --   --   48,000 
                         
Issuance of common stock of subsidiary for compensation  --   --   20,000   --   --   20,000 
                         
Spin-out of mineral operations and cancellation of common stock  (39,720,000)  (39,720)  39,720   --   --   -- 
                         
Net Loss  --   --   --   --   (597,725)  (597,725)
                         
Balance - December 31, 2009  51,703,500  $51,703  $1,627,647   --  $(2,097,121) $(417,771)


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-7 
43


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


  Years Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008 
Operating Activities      
Net Loss $(597,725) $(1,106,856)
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:        
Sales Returns and Allowance Reserve  (97,545)  107,627 
Depreciation and Amortization  63,380   61,732 
Share-Based Compensation  20,000   317,500 
Services Rendered for Common Stock  48,000   450,000 
Amortization of Deferred Compensation  --   14,307 
Deferred Tax Benefit  --   (92,486)
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts  6,000   80,407 
Amortization of Debt Discount  1,815   -- 
Change in Fair Value of Derivative  (1,032)  -- 
         
Changes in Assets and Liabilities        
[Increase] Decrease in:        
Accounts Receivable  365,499   (100,982)
Inventory  (51,282)  6,763 
Prepaid Expenses  36,201   9,481 
Increase [Decrease] in:        
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses  140,551   57,096 
Total Adjustments  531,589   911,445 
         
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities  (66,138)  (195,411)
         
Investing Activities:        
Capital Expenditures  (62,704)  -- 
         
Financing Activities:        
Increase [Decrease] in Cash Overdraft  6,372   (40,800)
Advances under Bank Lines of Credit – Net  11,514   56,828 
Proceeds from Notes Payable  100,000   -- 
Proceeds from Convertible Debt  25,000   -- 
Repayments of Notes Payable  (59,452)  (107,970)
Advances  from Stockholder – Net  68,810   304,243 
Repayments of Capital Leases  (23,402)  (17,490)
Proceeds from Private Placements of Subsidiary Stock  --   600 
         
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities  128,842   195,411 
         
Net Change in Cash  --   -- 
         
   Cash - Beginning of Years  --   -- 
         
Cash - End of Years $--  $-- 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-8 
44


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


 Years Ended December 31, 
 2009 2008 
     
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:    
Cash Paid during the years for:    
Interest $78,000  $101,000 
Income Taxes $2,000  $4,000 
         
Supplemental Disclosures of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:        
Debt Discount from Fair Value of Imbedded Derivative $10,890  $-- 
Issuance of Common Stock to Vendors for Payables $--  $50,000 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




F-9 
45


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
[1] Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

Nature of Operations – Bergio International, Inc. [the "Company"] was incorporated in the State of Delaware on July 24, 2007 under the name Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc. On October 21, 2009, as a result of a Share Exchange Agreement (defined below), the corporate name was changed to Bergio International, Inc. and we implemented a 12 for 1 forward stock split of our common shares. All share and per share data has been adjusted to reflect such stock split.  The Company is engaged in the product design, manufacturing, distribution of fine jewelry throughout the United States and is headquartered from its corporate office in Fairfield, New Jersey. Based on the nature of operations, the Company's sales cycle experiences si gnificant seasonal volatility with the first two quarters of the year representing 15% - 25% of annual sales and the remaining two quarters representing the remaining portion of annual sales.

On October 19, 2009, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”), with Diamond Information Institute, Inc. (“Diamond”), a New Jersey corporation. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement the Company acquired all the issued and outstanding common stock of Diamond, and Diamond became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. In addition, the Company acquired all Diamond’s assets and liabilities effective as of the date of the Exchange Agreement. Per the Exchange Agreement, the Company issued 31,022,100 (2,585,175 pre-split) shares of the Company’s common stock to the shareholders of Diamond (approximately .21884 pre-split shares of Company common stock for each share of Diamond common stock), representing approximately 60% of the Company’s aggregate issued and outst anding common stock following the closing of the Exchange Agreement and the Stock Agreement (defined below). The acquisition of Diamond was treated as a recapitalization, and the business of Diamond became the business of the Company. At the time of the recapitalization, the Company was in the exploration development stage and was not engaged in any active business. The accounting rules for recapitalizations require that beginning October 19, 2009, the date of the recapitalization, the balance sheet reflects the consolidated assets and liabilities of Bergio International, Inc. and the equity accounts were recapitalized to reflect the newly capitalized company. The results of operations reflect the operations of Diamond for all periods presented.

In conjunction with the Exchange Agreement, the Company, on October 20, 2009, entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Agreement”) with certain stockholders of the Company (the “former stockholders”). Pursuant to the Stock Agreement, the Company spun out its 100% interest in Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc., an Alberta, Canada corporation (“Alba Canada”) to the former stockholders for nominal consideration and the cancellation of all of the shares of common stock of the Company then owned by the former stockholders.  As a result, a total of 39,720,000 (3,310,000 pre-split) shares were cancelled.

F-10 
46


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Basis of Presentation and Liquidity - The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going-concern basis, which contemplates the continuation of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. For the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company generated net losses of approximately $598,000 and $1.1 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, the Company has funded its working capital requirements primarily through revenue earned, borrowings and periodic advances from its CEO and principal stockholder.


Subsequent to year end, the Company entered into various debt restructuring and financing agreements as follows:

*In February 2010, through an agreement with Socius CG II, Ltd (“Socius”), the Company settled a $700,000 payment of its credit line with Columbia Bank with the issuance of 5,700,000 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment) to Socius.
*In January 2010, the Company finalized a securities purchase agreement with Tangiers Investors, LP (“Tangiers”) pursuant to which at its discretion the Company can periodically sell to Tangiers shares of common stock up to a maximum purchase of $25,000,000.  The selling price will be 88% of the lowest volume weighted average price, as defined in the agreement, for the five days immediately following the notice of sale date. In addition, the Company issued Tangiers 1,111,111 shares of common stock valued at $500,000 for a one-time commitment fee.
*In January 2010, through two agreements with Caesar Capital Group, LLC (“Caesar”), the Company settled approximately $250,000 and $152,000 of stockholder loans through the issuance of 1,086,956 and 798,731 shares of common stock to Caesar.
*In March 2010, the Company settled approximately $247,000 in payables with the issuance of 7,800,000 shares of common stock to Socius and continues to work with Socius on the settlement of an additional approximate $750,000 of debt through the issuance of equity securities.

Over the next twelve months the Company believes that its existing capital combined with cash flow from operations will be sufficient to sustain its current operations.  However, in the event the Company locates potential acquisitions and/or mergers it will most likely need to sell equity and/or debt securities.









F-11 
47



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

[2] Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates - The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition - Revenue is recognized upon the shipment of products to customers with the price to the buyer being fixed and determinable and collectability reasonably assured. The Company maintains a reserve for potential product returns based on historical experience.

Cash and Cash Equivalents - Cash equivalents are comprised of certain highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. The Company did not have any cash equivalents on hand at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable is generated from sales of fine jewelry to retail outlets throughout the United States. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, accounts receivable were substantially comprised of balances due from retailers.

An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided against accounts receivable for amounts management believes may be uncollectible. The Company determines the adequacy of this allowance by regularly reviewing the composition of its accounts receivable aging and evaluating individual customer receivables, considering the customer’s financial condition, credit history and current economic circumstance. As of December 31, 2009, and 2008 an allowance for doubtful accounts of $86,407 and $80,407, respectively has been provided.

Inventories - Inventory consists primarily of finished goods and is valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the weighted average method and average cost is recomputed after each inventory purchase or sale.







F-12 
48


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Concentrations of Credit Risk Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and accounts receivables. The Company places its cash with high credit quality financial institutions. The Company, from time to time, maintains balances in financial institutions beyond the insured amounts. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had no cash balances beyond the federally insured amounts.

Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets into which the Company's services are provided, as well as their dispersion across many different geographical areas. As is characteristic of the Company's business and of the jewelry industry generally, the Company extends its customers seasonal credit terms. The carrying amount of receivables approximates fair value. The Company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers and believes its credit risk exposure on accounts receivable is limited. Based on management’s review of accounts receivable, an allowance for doubtful accounts has been recorded for the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2008. The Company does not require collateral to support these financial instruments.

Property and Equipment and Depreciation - Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from five (5) to seven (7) years.

Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred whereas expenditures for renewals and improvements that extend the useful life of the assets are capitalized. Upon the sale or retirement, the cost and the related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the respective accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reported within the Statements of Operations in the period of disposal.

Long-Lived Assets - In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, long-lived tangible assets subject to depreciation or amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets exceed their fair value as determined by an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows.

Losses on assets held for disposal are recognized when management has approved and committed to a plan to dispose of the assets, and the assets are available for disposal.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - Generally accepted accounting principles require disclosing the fair value of financial instruments to the extent practicable for financial instruments, which are recognized or unrecognized in the balance sheet. The fair value of the financial instruments disclosed herein is not necessarily representative of the amount that could be realized or settled, nor does the fair value amount consider the tax consequences of realization or settlement. In assessing the fair value of these financial instruments, the Company uses a variety of methods and assumptions, which are based on estimates of market conditions and risks existing at that time.  For certain instruments, including the cash overdraft, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, it was estimated that the carrying amount approximated fair value for the majority of these instruments because of their short maturity.  The fair value of property and equipment is estimated to approximate their net book value.  The fair value of debt obligations as recorded approximates their fair values due to the variable rate of interest associated with these underlying obligations.







F-13 
49


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates - Investments in unconsolidated affiliates, in which the Company owns less than 20% or otherwise does not exercise significant influence, are stated at cost.  At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had an investment in which the Company owned less than 1% interest in an unconsolidated affiliate and therefore the investment is carried at cost.

Equity-Based Compensation - The Company accounts for equity based compensation transactions with employees under the provisions of ASC Topic No. 718, “Compensation: Stock Compensation” (“Topic No. 718”). Topic No. 718 requires the recognition of the fair value of equity-based compensation in net income. The fair value of the Company’s equity instruments are estimated using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. This model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions and elections including expected stock price volatility and the estimated life of each award. In addition, the calculation of equity-based compensation costs requires that the Company estimate the number of awards that will be forfeite d during the vesting period. The fair value of equity-based awards granted to employees is amortized over the vesting period of the award and the Company elected to use the straight-line method for awards granted after the adoption of Topic No. 718.

The Company accounts for equity based transactions with non-employees under the provisions of ASC Topic No. 505-50, “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees” (“Topic No. 505-50”). Topic No. 505-50 establishes that equity-based payment transactions with non-employees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, which ever is more reliably measurable. When the equity instrument is utilized for measurement the fair value of the equity instrument is estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. In general, the Company recognizes an asset or expense in the same manner as if it was to receive cash for the goods or services instead of paying with or using the equity instrument.

Advertising and Promotional Costs -Advertising and promotional costs are expensed as incurred and are recorded as part of Selling Expenses in the Statement of Operations.  The total cost for the years ended December 31, 20092011 and 20082010 was approximately $44,000$187,000 and $46,000,$168,000, respectively.


During the year, the Company prepays costs associated with trade shows which are recorded as Prepaid Expenses in the Balance Sheet and are charged to the Statement of Operations upon the trade shows being conducted.  For the years ended December 31, 20092011 and 2008,2010, approximately $61,000$27,000 and $39,000,$31,000, respectively, of trade show expenses have been recorded.


Reclassification - Certain 2010 items have been reclassified to conform to 2011 presentation.





F-14 
50


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Income Taxes - The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic No. 740 “Income Taxes” which requires the use of the liability method of accounting for income taxes.  The liability method measures deferred income taxes by applying enacted statutory rates in effect at the balance sheet date to the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts on the financial statements.  The resulting deferred tax assets or liabilities are adjusted to reflect changes in tax laws as they occur.  A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realiz ed.realized.  At December 31, 20092011 and 2008,2010, the entire deferred tax asset has been fully reserved because management has determined that it is not more likely than not that the net operating loss carry forwards will be realized in the future.


On January 1, 2007,

The Company does not believe it has any uncertain tax position deemed material as of December 31, 2011 and 2010.  With few exceptions, the Company adopted the provisions of Topic No. 740 as they relatebelieves it is no longer subject to uncertainty in incomeU.S. federal and state tax positions.  There was no impact on the Company's  consolidated  financial  position,  results of operations or cash flows at December 31, 2006 andexaminations by tax authorities for the year then ended, as a result of  implementing  these provisions. At the adoption date of January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2008, the Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits.periods prior to 2008.  The Company'sCompany’s practice is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.  As of January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2008,2011 and 2010, the Company had no accrued interest or penalties.  The Company currently has no federal or state tax examina tionsexaminations in progress nor has it had any federal or state tax  examinations since its inception.  All of the Company's tax years are subject to federal and state tax examination.


Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share - Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing earnings  available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Dilutive earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could occur through the effect of common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, warrants and convertible securities.

 Equity instruments that may dilute earnings per share in the future are listed in Note 8. For the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, 41,086,693 and 1,559,813 shares, respectively, issuable upon the conversion of convertible debt were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share because their inclusion would be antidilutive.


Subsequent Events - The Company evaluated subsequent events, which are events or transactions that occurred after December 31, 20092011 through the issuance of the accompanying consolidated financial statements.



[3] New Authoritative Accounting Guidance


On July 1, 2009,May 12, 2011, the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) becameFASB issued ASU 2011-04.  The ASU is the Financialresult of joint efforts by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”IASB”) officially recognized source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles applicable to all public and non-public non-governmental entities, superseding existing FASB, AICPA, EITF and related literature. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under the authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other accounting literature is considered non-authoritative. The switch to the ASC affects the away companies refer to U.S. GAAP in financial statements and accounting policies. Citing particular content in the ASC involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content through the Topic, Subtopic, Section and Paragraph structure.








F-15 
51


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


FASB ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” New authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 820,”Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” affirms that the objective ofdevelop a single, converged fair value whenframework.  Thus, there are few differences between the market for an assetASU and its international counterpart, IFRS 13.  This ASU is not active is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction, and clarifies and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity for an asset when the market for that asset is not active. ASC Topic 820 requires an entity to base its conclusion about whether a transaction was not orderly on the weight of the evidence. The new accounting guidance amended prior guidance to expand certain disc losure requirements. The Company adopted the new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 820 during the first quarter of 2009. Adoption of the new guidance did not significantly impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Further new authoritative accounting guidance (Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-5) under ASC Topic 820 provides guidance for measuring thelargely consistent with existing fair value of a liabilitymeasurement principles in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active marketU.S. GAAP; however, it expands ASC 820’s existing disclosure requirements for the identical liability is not available. In such instances, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value utilizing a valuation technique that uses (i) the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, (ii) quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets, or (iii) another valuation technique thatmeasurements and makes other amendments. The ASU is consistent with the existing principles of ASC Topic 820, such as an income approach or market approach. The new authoritative accounting guidance also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The forgoing new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 820 will be effective for the Company’s consolidated financial statementsinterim and annual periods beginning October 1, 2009 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.







F-16 
52


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FASB ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events.” New authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 855, “Subsequent Events,” establishes general standardsafter December 15, 2011.  The adoption of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued. ASC Topic 855 defines (i) the period after the balance sheet date during which a reporting entity’s management should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (ii) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial stat ements, and (iii) the disclosures an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 855 became effective for the Company’s financial statements for periods ending after June 15, 2009. Effective February 24, 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-09, “Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements” which revised certain disclosure requirements. ASU No. 2010-092011-04 did not have a significant impactmaterial effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.





57



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



On June 16, 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, which revises the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements.  The company evaluated subsequent events, whichnew guidance removes the presentation options in ASC 220 and requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements.  The ASU does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income.  The amendments are events or transactions that occurredeffective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 31, 2009 through15, 2011.  The adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not have a material effect on the issuancefinancial position, results of operations or cash flows of the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Company.


Management does not believe that any other recently issued but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have an effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.



[4] Other Receivable


In February 2010, the Company sold all its shares in Diamond Information Institute, Inc. to an unrelated party for $225,000, and recognized a gain from the sale of $225,000.  Payments due on the receivable are in arrears and the Company has initiated legal proceedings against the purchaser.  The receivable balance as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, is $137,500 and $175,000, respectively.  Subsequent to December 31, 2011, the Company received a $65,000 payment on the receivable.  Management believes the remaining balance will be collected, but due to its uncertainty, has recorded an allowance of the full amount owed of $72,500 as other expenses.



[5] Property and Equipment


Property and equipment and accumulated depreciation and amortization are as follows:


  December 31,  
December 31,
 
  2009  2008 
       
Selling Equipment $64,353  $56,000 
Office and Equipment  296,621   242,271 
Leasehold Improvements  7,781   7,781 
Furniture and Fixtures  18,487   18,487 
         
Total – At Cost  387,242   324,539 
Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization  226,935   163,556 
         
Property and Equipment – Net $160,307  $160,983 

 

 

December 31,

December 31,

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling Equipment

 

$

8,354

 

$

8,354

Office and Equipment

 

 

355,024

 

 

325,530

Leasehold Improvements

 

 

7,781

 

 

7,781

Furniture and Fixtures

 

 

18,487

 

 

18,487

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total - At Cost

 

 

389,646

 

 

360,152

Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization

 

 

285,049

 

 

242,017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Property and Equipment - Net

 

$

104,597

 

$

118,135



Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 20092011 and 20082010 was approximately $63,000$43,000 and $62,000,$54,000, respectively.





F-17 
53

58




BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



[5]6] Notes Payable


  December 31,  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Notes payable due in equal monthly installments, over 36 months, maturing through May 2009 at interest rates of 7.25%.  The notes are collateralized by the assets of the Company. $--  $20,965 
         
Notes payable due in equal monthly installments, at December 31, 2009 – 19 monthly payments of $2,500 and one payment on June 30, 2011 equal to the outstanding balance; at December 31, 2008 - over 60 months, maturing through May 2011; interest rates of 7.60%.  The notes are collateralized by the assets of the Company.  115,259   158,320 
         
Notes payable due in equal monthly installments, over 60 months, maturing through December 2013 at interest rates of 9.47%. The notes are collateralized by specific assets of the Company.  83,074   -- 
Notes payable due on demand at interest rate of 10%.  11,500   -- 
Notes payable due on demand at interest rate of 10%.  10,000   -- 
         
Total  219,833   179,285 
Less: Current Maturities Included in Current Liabilities  69,335   82,015 
         
Total Long-Term Portion of Debt $150,498  $97,270 

 

December 31,

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable due in equal monthly installments, monthly payments of $2,500 and one payment on June 30, 2011 equal to the outstanding balance; interest rate of 7.60%.  The notes are collateralized by the assets of the Company. (1)

$

--

 

$

91,517

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable due in equal monthly installments, over 60 months, maturing through April 2014 at interest rates of 10.52%.  The notes are collateralized by specific assets of the Company.

 

51,626

 

 

70,169

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

51,626

 

 

161,686

Less: Current Maturities Included in Current Liabilities

 

20,591

 

 

110,060

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Total Long-Term Portion of Debt

$

31,035

 

$

51,626



Maturities of long-term debt are as follows:


Years ended
December 31,
   
2010 $69,335 
2011  104,921 
2012  21,678 
2013  23,899 
     
Total $219,833 

Years ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

$

20,591

2013

 

 

22,865

2014

 

 

8,170

 

 

 

 

     Total

 

$

51,626


(1) Terms in 2009 are per the Post Judgment Payment and Forbearance Agreement dated October 9, 2009, between the companyCompany and the bank.

 In the event of a default, the bank may immediately enforce its rights of collection for the full amount under the judgment, less credits for payment made through the date of default.  The note payable was paid off in November 2011 through an assignment and convertible debt agreement with Panache Capital, LLC.


F-18 
54





59




BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



[6]7] Bank Lines of Credit


A summary of the Company’s credit facilities is as follows:


  December 31,  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Credit Line of $700,000, minimum payment of interest only is due monthly at the bank's prime rate plus .75%. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the interest rate was 4.00%. The Credit Line renews annually in May and is collateralized by the assets of the Company. $699,999  $699,999 
         
Credit Line of $55,000, at December 31, 2009 – 19 monthly payments of $500 and one payment on June 30, 2011 equal to outstanding balance; at December 31, 2008 minimum payment of interest only is due monthly at the bank's prime rate plus .75%. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the interest rate was 4.00%; collateralized by the assets of the Company. (1)  44,380   45,793 
         
Various unsecured Credit Cards of $188,200 and $178,700, minimum payment of principal and interest are due monthly at the credit card's annual interest rate. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the interest rates ranged from 3.99% to 24.90% and 4.74% to 13.99%, respectively.  177,584   164,657 
         
Total  921,963   910,449 
         
Less:  Current maturities included in current liabilities  883,583   910,449 
         
  $38,380  $-- 

 

December 31,

 

2011

 

2010

Credit line of $75,000 as of December 16, 2011, due June 1, 2012.  Monthly payments of accrued unpaid interest due beginning February 1, 2012.  Principal plus all accrued unpaid interest due on June 1, 2012.  Interest rate is bank’s prime rate plus 1.75%, minimum of 5.75%.  Collateralized by the assets of the company.

$

--

 

$

--

��

 

 

 

 

 

Credit Line of $55,000 monthly payments of $500 and one payment on June 30, 2011 equal to outstanding balance; interest at the bank’s prime rate plus .75%. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the interest rate was 4.00%. Collateralized by the assets of the Company. (1)

 

--

 

 

40,153

 

 

 

 

 

 

Various unsecured Credit Cards of $161,000, minimum payment of principal and interest are due monthly at the credit card’s annual interest rate. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the interest rates ranged from 3.99% to 24.90%.

 

104,326

 

 

160,713

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

104,326

 

 

200,866

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less:  Current maturities included in current liabilities

 

104,326

 

 

200,866

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Long-Term Portion

$

--

 

$

--



The Company'sCompany’s CEO and majority shareholder also serves as a guarantor of the Company'sCompany’s debt.


The Company had approximately $10,000 and $9,000 available under the various credit facilities (not including credit cards) at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Maturities of long-term debt are as follows:

Years ended
December 31,
   
2010 $883,583 
2011  38,380 
     
Total $921,963 


1)

(1) Terms in 2009 are per the Post JudgmentJudgement Payment and Forbearance Agreement dated October 9, 2009, between the companyCompany and the bank.

 In the event of a default, the bank may immediately enforce its rights of collection for the full amount under the judgement, less credits for payment made through the date of default.  The credit line was paid off in November 2011, through an assignment and convertible debt agreement with Asher Enterprises, Inc.



F-19 
55


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

[7]8] Convertible Debt


On November 16, 2009,

Asher


In April 2011, the Company issued a 7% Secured Convertible Debenturean 8% convertible note (the “November 2009 Debenture”“April 2011 Note”) in the amount of $25,000$50,000 to Tangiers Capital, LLC.Asher Enterprises, Inc. (“Asher”).  The principal and accrued interest was due on January 18, 2012, or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Asher at any time after the six month anniversary of the issue date and by the Company at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 62.5% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.  In October and November 2011, the convertible note and $2,000 of accrued interest were converted into 2,109,575 shares of common stock.




60



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



In July 2011, the Company issued an 8% convertible note (the “July 2011 Note”) in the amount of $32,500 to Asher.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on April 18, 2012, or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Asher at any time after the six month anniversary of the issue date and by the Company at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 62.5% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.


In August 16,2011, the Company issued an 8% convertible note (the “August 2011 Note”) in the amount of $32,500 to Asher.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on May 29, 2012, or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Asher at any time after the six month anniversary of the issue date and by the Company at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 60.0% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.


In September 2011, the Company issued an 8% convertible note (the “September 2011 Note”) in the amount of $37,500 to Asher.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on June 28, 2012, or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Asher at any time after the six month anniversary of the issue date and by the Company at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 62.5% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.


In November 2011, the Company issued a 10% convertible note (the “November 2011 Note”) in the amount of $39,522 to Asher in consideration for payment of a line of credit with a principal balance of $36,971 plus interest of $2,551 (See Note 7).  The principal and accrued interest is payable on December 31, 2012, or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Asher at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 61% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.  In November 2011, the November 2011 Note was converted into 2,333,134 shares of common stock.


In November 2011, the Company issued an 8% convertible note (the “November 2011 Note #2”) in the amount of $32,500 to Asher.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on September 5, 2012, or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Asher at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in agreement. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 61% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.


On February 1, 2010, the Company issued an 8% secured convertible note (the “February 2010 Note”) in the amount of $50,000 to Asher Enterprises, Inc. (“Asher”).  The principal and accrued interest is payable on January 2, 2011, or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Asher at any time after the six month anniversary of the issue date and by the Company at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 62.5% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten trading day period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.  During 2011 and 2010, $3,000 and $47,000 of the convertible note was converted into 100,000 and 538,829 shares of common stock, respectively.




61



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



On March 12, 2010, the Company issued an 8% secured convertible note (the “March 2010 Note”) in the amount of $30,000 to Asher.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on December 13, 2010 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  Upon issuance,The note is convertible by Asher at any time after the November 2009 Debenture,six month anniversary of the issue date and by the Company at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 62.5% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten trading day period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.  In February and March 2011, the convertible note was converted into 1,121,975 shares of common stock.


In April 2010, the Company issued an 8% secured convertible note (the “April 2010 Note”) in the amount of $40,000 to Asher.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on January 13, 2011, or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Asher at any time after the six month anniversary of the issue date and by the Company at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 62.5% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten trading day period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.  In April 2011, the convertible note was converted into 3,847,321 shares of common stock.


In May 2010, the Company issued an 8% secured convertible note (the “May 2010 Note”) in the amount of $40,000 to Asher.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on February 11, 2011, or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Asher at any time after the six month anniversary of the issue date and by the Company at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 62.5% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten trading day period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.  In May and June 2011, the convertible note was converted into 3,999,843 shares of common stock.


Asher is entitled to have all shares issued upon conversion of the above notes listed upon each national securities exchange or other automated quotation system, if any, upon which shares of the Company common stock are then listed.


Tangiers


Effective January 2011, the Company entered into a 7% convertible promissory note agreement (the “January 2011 Note”) in the amount of $25,000 with Tangiers Capital, LLC (“Tangiers”) for the settlement of an accrued termination fee related to the securities purchase agreement with Tangiers.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on June 18, 2012 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note, including any accrued interest, wasis convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 80% of the average of the two lowest trading prices,price, determined on the then current trading market for the Company’s common stock, for the ten trading days prior to conversion, at the option of the holder.  The holder is entitled to “piggyback” registration rights onIn March and April 2011, the convertible note and accrued interest was converted into 1,965,254 shares of common stock.


Strategic


In May 2011, the Company issued a 15% convertible note (the “May 2011 Note”) in the amount of $50,000 to Strategic Business Initiatives, LLC (“Strategic”).  The principal and accrued interest is payable on November 30, 2011 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The Company must give 10 days’ notice to Strategic about its intent to prepay the note.  During the ten day period, prior to the Company’s prepayment, Strategic has the option to convert all or a portion of the principal and/or accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 80% of the five day average closing price immediately prior to the conversion date.


In November 2011, the Company settled the note in full through an exchange agreement with Genesis Capital Management, LLC (see below).





62



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Panache


In November 2011, the Company issued upona 10% convertible Note (the “November 2011 Note #3”) in the amount of $50,000 to Panache Capital, LLC (“Panache”).  The principal and accrued interest is payable on November 16, 2012 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Panache at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 65% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.


In November 2011, the Company issued a 10% convertible note (the “November 2011 Note #4”) in the amount of $75,000 to Panache in consideration for payment of a note payable with a principal balance of $72,371 plus interest of $2,629 (See Note 6).  The principal and accrued interest is payable on November 16, 2012 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Panache at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 65% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion. In November and December 2011, $16,369 of principal was converted into 1,100,000 shares of common stock.


Caesar


In November 2011, the Company issued a 12% convertible note (the “November 2011 Note #5”) in the amount of $31,000 to Caesar Capital Group, LLC (“Caesar”).  The principal and accrued interest is payable on August 11, 2012 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Caesar at any time after the six month anniversary of the issue date with conversion periods as defined in agreement. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 35% of the lesser of closing bid price one day prior to conversion or the average of the five trading days ending one day prior to conversion.


TCA Global


In November 2011, the Company issued a 12% convertible note (the “November 2011 Note #6”) in the amount of $200,000 to TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (“TCA Global”).  The principal and accrued interest is payable on December 22, 2012, or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by TCA Global at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 95% of the average of the five lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.


Genesis


In November 2011, the Company issued an 8% convertible note (the “November 2011 Note #7”) in the amount of $64,643 through an exchange agreement with Genesis Capital Management, LLC (“Genesis”).  The new note settled in full the note with Strategic in the principal amount of $50,000 plus accrued interest of $3,869.  In addition, the Company incurred finance costs of $10,774.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on November 30, 2012, or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Genesis at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 65% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.  In December 2011, $36,000 of principal was converted into 2,517,483 shares of common stock.


In November 2011, the Company issued a 10% convertible note (the “November 2011 Note #8”) in the amount of $60,000 to Genesis.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on June 1, 2012, or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Genesis at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in agreement. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 65% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.



63



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



The Company accounts for the fair value of the conversion featurefeatures in accordanc eaccordance with ASC Topic No. 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging; Embedded Derivatives” (“Topic No. 815-15”).  Topic No. 815-15 requires the Company to bifurcate and separately account for the conversion featurefeatures as an embedded derivative contained in the Company’s convertible debt.  The Company is required to carry the embedded derivative on its balance sheet at fair value and account for any unrealized change in fair value as a component of consolidated results of operations.  The Company valued the embedded derivative using the Black-Scholes pricing model.  The fair valuevalues upon issuance $10,890, wasof the January 2011 Note of $12,478, April 2011 Note of $32,704, May 2011 Note of $16,570, July 2011 Note of $30,962, August 2011 Note of $32,500, September 2011 Note of $21,507, November 2011 Note of $28,344, November 2011 Note #2 of $32,500, November 2011 Note #3 of $12,488, November 2011 Note #4 of $18,731, November 2011 Note #5 of $31,000, November 2011 Note #6 of $22,982, November 2011 Note #7 of $64,643 and November 2011 Note #8 of $34,028 were recorded as a derivative liability and a discount to the convertible debt.  The discount is being amortized over the 9 month life of the debt. Amortization of debt discount amounted to $1,815$199,895 and $120,230 for the yearyears ended December 31, 2009.2011 and 2010, respectively.  The derivative liability is revalued each reporting period using the Black-Scholes model. For the yearyears ended December 31, 2009,2011 and 2010, the Company recorded an unrealiz edunrealized gain from the change in the fair value of the derivative liability of $1,032.$176,841 and $60,026, respectively.  Convertible debt as of December 31, 2011 ($563,274) and December 31, 2010 ($119,250), is shown net of debt discount in the amount of $198,723 and $7,181, respectively.


The Black-Scholes model was valued with the following inputs:


·

Stock Price - The Stock Price was based on the average closing price of the Companys stock as of the Valuation Date.  Stock Prices ranged from $0.01 to $0.12 in the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011.


·

Variable Conversion Price - The variable conversion price was based on: (i) 80% of the lowest Stock Price out of the last ten trading days prior to the Valuation Date (Tangiers); (ii) 62.5%, 61% and 60% of the average of the three lowest Stock Prices out of the last ten trading days prior to the Valuation Date (Asher); (iii) 80% of the five day average Stock Price for the last five trading days prior to Valuation Date (Strategic); (iv) 35% of the lesser of Stock Price one day prior to conversion or the average of the five trading days ending one day prior to Valuation Date (Caesar); (v) 65% of the average of the three lowest Stock Prices out of the last ten trading days prior to the Valuation Date (Panache) and (Genesis) and (vi) 95% of the average of the five lowest Stock Price during the ten trading days ending one day prior to the Valuation Date (TCA Global).


·

Time to Maturity - The time to maturity was determined based on the length of time between the Valuation Date and the maturity of the debt.  Time to maturity ranged from 14 months to 0 months in the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011.


·

Risk Free Rate - The risk free rate was based on the Treasury Note rates as of the Valuation Dates with term commensurate with the remaining term of the debt.  The risk free rate ranged from 0.10% to 0.30% in the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011.


·

Volatility - The volatility was based on the historical volatility of three comparable companies as historical volatility of the Company was not useful in developing the expected volatility due to the limited trading history of its stock.  The average volatility for the comparable companies ranged from 52.60% to 57.96% in the period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011.






64



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



[8]9] Equipment Held Under Capital Leases


The Company'sCompany’s equipment held under the capital lease obligations as of December 31, 20092011 and 20082010, is summarized as follows:


 December 31, December 31, 
 2009 2008 
     
Showroom Equipment $96,000  $96,000 
Less: Accumulated Amortization  54,933   35,733 
         
Equipment Held under Capitalized Lease Obligations - Net $41,067  $60,267 

 

December 31,

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

Showroom Equipment

$

40,000

 

$

40,000

Less: Accumulated Amortization

 

32,667

 

 

24,667

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Equipment Held under Capitalized Lease Obligations - Net

$

7,333

 

$

15,333


Amortization related to the equipment held under capital leases foris calculated using the straight-line method over the five year useful lives of the assets.  For the years ended December 31, 20092011 and 20082010, amortization was approximately $19,000$8,000 and $19,000,$9,000, respectively.





F-20 
56


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of December 31, 2009 the future minimum

The capital lease payments under the capital leases are as follows:

obligation was paid in full during 2011.


2010 $26,432 
2011  17,404 
     
Total  43,836 
Less: Amount Representing Imputed Interest  4,744 
     
Present Value of Net Minimum Capital Lease Payments  39,092 
Less: Current Portion of Capitalized Lease Obligations  22,375 
     
Non Current Portion of Capitalized Lease Obligations $16,717 


Interest expense related to capital leases for the years ended December 31, 20092011 and 20082010 was approximately $5,000$500 and $7,000,$4,000, respectively.



[9]10] Income Taxes


The income tax [benefit] provision is as follows:

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2009  2008 
Current:      
     Federal $--  $-- 
     State  --   3,353 
         
     Totals  --   3,353 
         
Deferred:        
     Federal  --   (78,672)
     State  --   (13,814)
         
     Totals  --   (92,486)
         
     Totals $--  $(89,133)


F-21 
57


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

[9] Income Taxes (Continued)

Deferred income tax assets [liabilities] are as follows:


  December 31,  December 31, 
  2009  2008 
       
Deferred Income Tax Assets:      
    Net Operating Loss Carryforwards $656,485  $590,514 
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts  34,511   32,115 
Allowance for Sales Returns  13,903   52,862 
         
     Totals  704,899   675,491 
         
Deferred Income Tax Liabilities:        
     Property and Equipment $(25,925) $(25,546)
     Sec. 481 Adjustment - Accrual Basis  (249,919)  (374,879)
     Totals  (275,844)  (400,425)
     Gross Deferred Tax Asset [Liability]  429,055   275,066 
         
     Valuation Allowance for Deferred Taxes  (429,055)  (275,066)
     Net Deferred Tax Asset [Liability] $--  $-- 

 

December 31,

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Income Tax Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

     Net Operating Loss Carryforwards

$

413,718

 

$

289,716

     Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

48,104

 

 

14,293

     Start-up Costs

 

15,501

 

 

18,237

               Totals

 

477,323

 

 

322,246

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Income Tax Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

     Property and Equipment

 

(23,651)

 

 

(20,135)

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Gross Deferred Tax Asset [Liability]

 

453,672

 

 

302,111

 

 

 

 

 

 

     Valuation Allowance for Deferred Taxes

 

(453,672)

 

 

(302,111)

     Net Deferred Tax Asset [Liability]

$

--

 

$

--






65



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Reconciliation of the Federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:


  2009  2008 
       
U.S. statutory rate  (34%)  (34%)
State income taxes – net of federal benefit  6%  6%
Change in valuation allowance and other  28%  21%
Effective rate  --   (7%)

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

U.S. statutory rate

(34%)

 

(34%)

State income taxes - net of federal benefit

6%

 

6%

Change in valuation allowance and other

28%

 

28%

Effective rate

--

 

--


Effective with the 2008 tax year, management voluntarily elected a change in its method of tax accounting to the accrual basis as required by Section 481 of the Internal Revenue Code (the "IRC"). In management's opinion, based on provisions of the IRC, a voluntary election to the accrual basis of tax reporting should not subject the Company to tax examinations for previous years that income tax returns have been filed and prompt an uncertain tax position in accordance with the ASC Topic No. 740. As a result, no contingent liability has been recorded for the anticipated change in tax reporting. Further, the resulting tax liability from the change in tax accounting method will be reduced by operating losses previously incurred.

F-22 
58



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

At December 31, 2009,2011, the Company had approximately $1,600,000$1,045,000 of federal net operating tax loss carryforwards expiring at various dates through 2029.2030.  The Tax Reform Act of 1986 enacted a complex set of rules which limits a company'scompany’s ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards in periods following an ownership change.  These rules define an ownership change as a greater than 50 percent point change in stock ownership within a defined testing period which is generally a three-year period.  As a result of stock which may be issued by us from time to time and the conversion of warrants, options or the result of other changes in ownership of our outstanding stock, the Company may experience an ownership change and consequently our utilization of net operating loss carryforwards could be significan tlysignificantly limited.


Based upon the net losses historically incurred and, the prospective global economic conditions, management believes that it is not more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will be realized and has provided a valuation allowance of 100% of the deferred tax asset.  The valuation allowance increased (decreased) by approximately $154,000$152,000 and $275,000$(127,000) in the years ended December 31, 20092011 and 2008,2010, respectively.



[10] Stockholders'11] Stockholders’ Equity


The Company is authorized to issue 75,000,000200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001$0.001 per share and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share.


Common Stock


At December 31, 20092011 and 2008,2010, there were 51,703,50041,302,182 and 60,401,40011,159,574 common shares issued and outstanding, respectively.  At December 31, 2011, an approximate additional 41,000,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under the Incentive Stock and Award Plan and for outstanding convertible debt.  In October 2009, the Company effectedaffected a 12 for 112-for-1 forward split of its common stock.  Effective December 27, 2010, the Company implemented a 1-for-12 reverse stock split.  All share and per share data has been retroactively adjusted to reflect such stock split.

splits.


On October 19, 2009,

Preferred Stock


The preferred stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series as designated by the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”), with Diamond Information Institute, Inc. (“Diamond”), a New Jersey corporation. Pursuant toCompany’s Board of Directors. Effective September 1, 2011, the Exchange AgreementBoard of Directors authorized the Company acquired all the issuedissuance and outstanding common stock of Diamond, and Diamond became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. In addition, the Company acquired all Diamond’s assets and liabilities effective as of the date of the Exchange Agreement. Per the Exchange Agreement, the Company issued 31,022,100 (2,585,175 pre-split)51 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 to its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), pursuant to his employment agreement (see Note 12).  The Series A Preferred Stock, initially, will pay no dividends and has no conversion rights. The Series A Preferred Stock ranks senior to the Company’s common stock and to any other series of capital stock hereafter created, unless specifically designated as senior by the shareholdersBoard of Diamond (approximately .21884 pre-splitDirectors.  Upon liquidation, the holders of Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to receive net assets on a pro rata basis. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock has voting rights such that the holder of 51 shares of Series A Preferred Stock will effectively maintain majority voting control of the Company.


In March 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,988,054 shares of common stock valued at $23,558 to its Chief Executive Officer pursuant to his employment agreement (see Note 12).




66



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


During fiscal 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 13,511,848 shares of common stock to Asher for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest as follows: February 2010 Note remaining debt of $3,000, March 2010 Note of $30,000 and accrued interest of $3,200, April 2010 Note of $40,000 and accrued interest of $3,121, May 2010 Note of $40,000 and accrued interest of $2,849, April 2011 Note of $50,000 and accrued interest of $2,000 and November 2011 Note of $39,522.  The shares are valued at $213,692 (see Note 8).


In February, March and April 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,107,093 shares of common stock to Tangiers for full conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.  The notes and accrued interest were November 2009 Note remaining debt of $6,250 plus accrued interest of $1,694 and June 2010 Note of $25,000 plus accrued interest of $1,371. The shares are valued at $34,315 (see Note 8).


In August 2011, the Company issued 533,553 shares of common stock for each sharepayment of Diamond common stock), representing approximately 60%legal fees.  The shares are valued at $34,681, the fair value at date of issuance.


In October 2011, the Company’s aggregateCompany issued and outst anding400,000 shares of common stock followingfor deferred offering costs.  The shares are valued at $20,000, the closingfair value at date of the Exchange Agreement and the Stock Agreement (defined below). The acquisition of Diamond was treated as a recapitalization, and the business of Diamond became the business of the Company. At the time of the recapitalization,issuance.


In November 2011, the Company was in the exploration development stageissued 1,040,133 shares of common stock for payment of accounts payable.  The shares are valued at $31,100.


In November and was not engaged in any active business. The accounting rules for recapitalizations require that beginning October 19, 2009, the date of the recapitalization, the balance sheet reflects the consolidated assets and liabilities of Bergio International, Inc. and the equity accounts were recapitalized to reflect the newly capitalized company. The results of operations reflect the operations of Diamond for all periods presented.






F-23 
59


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In conjunction with the Exchange Agreement,December 2011, the Company on October 20, 2009, entered intoissued 1,100,000 shares of common stock to Panache for partial conversion of its November 2011 Note #4 of $75,000 convertible debt.  The shares are valued at $16,369 (See Note 8).


In December 2011, the Company issued 2,517,483 shares of common stock to Genesis for partial conversion of its November 2011 Note #7 of $64,643 convertible debt.  The shares are valued at $36,000 (See Note 8).


In December 2011, the Company issued 1,736,111 shares of common stock to TCA Global for deferred offering cost. The shares are valued at $31,250.  The Company also recorded 5,208,333 common shares issuable to TCA Global for deferred offering costs.  The shares are valued at $93,750 (See Note 13).


In January 2010, the Company finalized a StockSecurities Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Agreement”with Tangiers Investments, LP (“Tangiers”) with certain stockholders of the Company (the “former stockholders”)(See Note 13).  Pursuant to the Stock Agreement,agreement the Company spun out its 100% interest in Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc., an Alberta, Canada corporationissued Tangiers 92,593 shares of common stock valued at the market price of $500,000 for a one-time commitment fee.


In January 2010, the Company issued 157,142 shares of common stock to Caesar Capital Group, LLC (“Alba Canada”Caesar”) to settle approximately $402,000 of stockholder advances and accrued interest.


In February 2010, the former stockholdersCompany sold 125,000 shares of common stock to Caesar for nominal consideration$30,000.  The value of the stock on the date of sale based on the market price was $90,000 and the cancellationCompany recorded an expense for financing costs of all$60,000.


In February 2010, through an agreement with Socius CG II, Ltd (“Socius”), the Company settled a $699,999 payment of its credit line with Columbia Bank with the issuance of 1,190,249 shares of common stock to Socius.


In 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 19,666 shares of common stock for legal services rendered for the registration of securities with the SEC.  The shares are valued at $23,160 the market price, and are recorded as financing costs.


In March 2010, the Company issued 90,833 shares of common stock to a consultant for services rendered.  The shares are valued at the market price of $62,900 and are recorded as share-based consulting expense.


In 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 714,473 shares of common stock to Socius for settlement of approximately $247,000 in payables.



67



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



In April 2010, the Company issued 25,000 shares of common stock for accounting services rendered for the registration of securities with the SEC.  The shares are valued at $12,000 and are recorded as financing costs.


In April 2010, the Company issued 375,000 shares of common stock valued at $180,000 to settle share liability.  The accrued share liability was expensed as share based services.


In 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 3,232,020 shares of common stock to its Chief Executive Officer pursuant to his employment agreement (see Note 13).


In 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 538,829 shares of common stock to Asher for partial conversion of its convertible debt.  The shares are valued at $47,000.


In 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 290,144 shares of common stock to Tangiers Capital, LLC for partial conversion of its convertible debt.  The shares are valued at $18,750.


Incentive Stock and Award Plan


On May 9, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors approved, authorized and adopted the 2011 Incentive Stock and Award Plan (the “Plan”).  Subject to adjustment for mergers, reorganizations, consolidation, recapitalization, stock dividend or other change in corporate structure, a total of 5,000,000shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share is subject to the Plan.  Under the Plan, the Company may grant non-qualified options (the “Non-qualified Options”), incentive options (the “Incentive Options” and together with the Non-qualified Options, the “Options”) and restricted stock (the “Restricted Stock”) to directors, officers, consultants, attorneys, advisors and employees.  Subject to a tax exception, if any Option or Restricted Stock expires or is canceled prior to its exercise or vesting in full, the shares of common stock ofissuable under the Option or Restricted Stock may be issuable pursuant to future Options or Restricted Stock under the Plan.


On August 26, 2011, the Company then owned bygranted 533,553 shares of common stock under the former stockholders.Plan valued at $34,681, the fair value at date of grant, to its attorney.  As a result, a total of 39,720,000 (3,310,000 pre-split) shares were cancelled.


In the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, our subsidiary issued 120,000 and 450,0002011, there are 4,466,447 shares of its common stock valued at $48,000 and $450,000, respectively, to its SEC counselavailable for professional services.

Inissuance under the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, our subsidiary issued 50,000 and 317,500 shares of its common stock valued at $20,000 and $317,500, respectively, to members of its Board of Directors and Advisory Panel for services rendered.

InPlan. No options have been granted under the year ended December 31, 2008, our subsidiary sold 600 shares of its common stock to unrelated individuals for $600.
plan.



[11]12] Related Party Transactions


The Company receives periodic advances from its principal stockholder based upon the Company'sCompany’s cash flow needs.  At December 31, 20092011 and 2008, $463,3422010, $323,086 and $394,532,$317,601, respectively was due to the shareholder.  Interest expense is accrued at an average annual market rate of interest which was 3.25% and 4.99% at December 31, 20092011 and 2008,2010, respectively.  No terms for repayment have been established.  As a result, the amount is classified as a Current Liability.


In the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,988,054 and 3,232,020 shares of common stock and 51 shares of Series A preferred stock to its CEO, in accordance with his employment agreement (See Note 13), respectively.  The common shares were valued at $23,558 and $70,833 the amount of unpaid compensation owed the CEO, respectively.







68



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


[12]13] Commitment and Contingencies


Employment Agreement - Effective February 28, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its CEO.  The agreement, which is for a five year term, provides for an initial base salary of $175,000 per year with a 3% annual increase thereafter (the “Base Salary”).  The CEO is also entitled to certain bonuses based on net profits before taxes and other customary benefits, as defined in the agreement.  In addition, since it is understood that the Company is employing the CEO during a time of economic decline throughout the U.S. and at times and from time to time, the Company may not be in a position to pay the full amount of Base Salary owed the CEO it is understood and agreed to by the Board, that as long as the Company is unable to pay the CEO the full amount of his Base Salary that the Board shall issue to him, from time to time, an amount of shares that will allow him to remain in possession of fifty-one percent (51%) of the Company’s then outstanding common stock.  Such issuances shall be made to the CEO at any time when his total share holdings are reduced to an amount less than fifty-one percent (51%) as a result of issuance of shares made on behalf of the Company.  The CEO waived the 3% annual increase for 2011.


Effective September 1, 2011, the Company and CEO entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the “Amended Agreement”), which primarily retains the term and compensation of the original agreement.  The Amended Agreement, however, removes the section which previously provided for the issuance of Company common stock to the CEO, from time to time, when the Company is unable to pay the CEO the full amount of his Base Salary which would allow the CEO to maintain a fifty-one percent (51%) share of the Company’s outstanding common stock.  However, the CEO does have the right to request all or a portion of his unpaid Base Salary be paid with the Company’s restricted common stock.  In addition, the Amended Agreement provides for the issuance of 51 shares of newly authorized Series A Preferred Stock to be issued to the CEO. As defined in the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series A Preferred Stock, each share of Series A Preferred Stock has voting rights such that the holder of 51 shares of Series A Preferred Stock will effectively maintain majority voting control of the Company.  Effective November 3, 2011, the CEO notified the Company that for the one year period, retroactive from April 1, 2011, through March 31, 2012, he would reduce his Base Salary to $100,000.


Operating Leases - The Company leases certain office and manufacturing facilities and equipment.  The Company’s office and manufacturing facilities are currently leased on a month to month basis at $1,800 per month.  The equipment lease agreements which expirewere non-cancelable and expired at various dates through 2011, are subject, in many cases, to renewal options and provide for the payment of taxes, and operating costs, such as insurance and maintenance.  Certain leases contain escalation clauses resulting from the pass-through of increases in operating costs and property taxes.2011.  All these leases are classified as operating leases.






F-24 
60


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Aggregate minimum annual rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases are  Effective January 2012, the monthly lease for office and manufacturing was revised to $1,100 per month (November and December 2011 monthly rent was waived as follows:
part of new agreement).


Years ended
December 31,
   
2010 $15,900 
2011  600 
     
Total $16,500 

Rent expense for the Company'sCompany’s operating leases for the years ended December 31, 20092011 and 20082010 was approximately $25,000$18,000 and $26,000,$22,000, respectively.


Acquisition - The Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Mario Panelli & C. s.a.s. (the “Seller”), an Italian distributor of high-end jewelry, and Mario Panelli and Mogni Viviana, wherein the Company agreed to purchase the inventory of the Seller.  The Company agreed to pay the Seller an amount equal to 100% of the book value of the Seller’s inventory as determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.  The closing date has been extended pending the Company obtaining adequate financing to complete the transaction.


Equity Financing Agreement - In January 2010, the Company finalized a securities purchase agreement with Tangiers Investors, LP (“Tangiers”), pursuant to which at its discretion the Company can periodically sell to Tangiers shares of common stock up to a maximum purchase of $25,000,000.  The selling price will be 88% of the lowest volume weighted average price, as defined in the agreement, for the five days immediately following the notice of sale date. In addition, the Company issued Tangiers 92,593 shares of common stock valued at $500,000 for a one-time commitment fee which is recorded as deferred offering costs.  Effective, June 22, 2010, the Company terminated the securities purchase agreement with Tangiers and recorded an expense of $535,160 as share-based financing costs which included the $500,000 commitment fee and $35,160 of professional fees related to a registration statement for common shares to be issued pursuant to the agreement, which was also terminated.



69



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Consulting Agreement - The Company entered into an agreement for business development services with a consultant.  Pursuant to the agreement, the Company issued 375,000 shares of Company common stock for the services, which primarily were rendered in the first quarter of 2010.  The shares, which were issued in April 2010, are valued at the market price of $180,000.


Committed Equity Facility Agreement - In November 2011, the Company entered into a committed equity facility agreement with TCA Global to issue and sell from time to time up to $2,500,000 of the Company’s common stock at 95% of the market price to TCA Global, as defined in the agreement. The Company incurred a non-refundable facility fee of $125,000 (5%) payable in shares of the Company’s common stock which was recorded as deferred offering cost. The fee is to be paid in four quarterly installments.  The Company issued 1,736,111 shares of common stock valued at $31,250 for the first installment at the date of execution of the agreement.  The Company has also recorded common stock issuable for the remaining three installments in the amount of 5,208,333 common shares valued at $93,750.  The number of shares of common stock issuable will be adjusted based on the future market value of the common stock, as defined in the agreement.


Litigation - The Company is currently a defendant in a litigation filed by Moti Ganz USA, Ltd., as plaintiff, involving the return of a piece of jewelry valued at approximately $12,000.  The Company is currently finalizing negotiations to have the jewelry returned.

The Company is currently a plaintiff in a litigation filed against Macau Consultants and Advisory Services, Inc., Diamond International, Inc., Stanley Larson, Merlin Larson, Dennis Atkins, Paul Crawford, et al, as defendants.  The litigation involves the sale of Diamond International, Inc. to Macau Consultants and Advisory Services, Inc. for a purchase price of $225,000.   A past due receivable balance of $137,500 was due to the Company at December 31, 2011.  Subsequent to December 31, 2011, the Company received a payment of $65,000, leaving a remaining balance of $72,500.

Other than the matters described above, we are currently not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.  There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.



[14] Subsequent Events


In January 2012, the Company issued 1,985,955 shares of common stock for conversion of debt. The shares are valued at $19,304 per the terms of the various convertible debt agreements.


In February 2012, the Company issued 7,238,901 shares of common stock for conversion of debt. The shares are valued at $50,164 per the terms of the various convertible debt agreements.


In March 2012, the Company issued 9,974,352 shares of common stock for conversion of debt.  The shares are valued at $66,237 pre the terms of the various convertible debt agreements.












BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.


INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011


PAGES

BALANCE SHEETS AS OF MARCH 31, 2012 AND DECEMBER 31, 2011 (UNAUDITED)

72

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011 (UNAUDITED)

73

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

74

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011 (UNAUDITED)

75

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

76




















BERGIO INTERNATIONAL ,INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

(UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

18,252

 

$

128,238

 

 

Accounts Receivable - Net

 

 

383,572

 

 

385,642

 

 

Inventory

 

 

1,674,659

 

 

1,529,394

 

 

Prepaid Expenses

 

 

26,433

 

 

14,863

 

 

Other Receivable - Net

 

 

-

 

 

65,000

 

 

Deferred Financing Costs

 

 

42,417

 

 

60,689

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Current Assets

 

 

2,145,333

 

 

2,183,826

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and Equipment - Net

 

 

109,867

 

 

104,597

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred Offering Costs

 

 

175,000

 

 

175,000

 

 

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate

 

 

5,828

 

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Total Other Assets

 

 

180,828

 

 

180,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

$

2,436,028

 

$

2,468,423

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

 

$

210,402

 

$

119,231

 

 

Bank Lines of Credit - Net

 

 

122,498

 

 

104,326

 

 

Convertible Debt, Net

 

 

359,357

 

 

364,551

 

 

Current Maturities of Notes Payable

 

 

25,477

 

 

20,591

 

 

Advances from Stockholder - Net

 

 

221,244

 

 

323,086

 

 

Derivative Liability

 

 

310,230

 

 

282,584

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

 

 

1,249,208

 

 

1,214,369

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long Term Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes Payable

 

 

22,865

 

 

31,035

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities

 

 

1,272,073

 

 

1,245,404

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders' Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Series A Preferred Stock - $.001 Par Value, 51 Shares  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Authorized, 51 and 51 Shares Issued and Outstanding  (See Note 11)

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

  Common Stock,  $0.001 Par Value; 200,000,000 Shares Authorized,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    60,501,390 and 41,302,182 Issued and Outstanding

 

 

60,501

 

 

41,302

 

 

  Additional Paid-In Capital

 

 

4,669,571

 

 

4,526,165

 

 

  Accumulated Deficit

 

 

(3,566,117)

 

 

(3,344,448)

 

 

  Total Stockholders' Equity

 

 

1,163,955

 

 

1,223,019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

 

$

2,436,028

 

$

2,468,423



See notes to financial statements.




BERGIO INTERNATIONAL ,INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales - Net

 

$

329,947

 

$

270,551

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of Sales

 

 

135,660

 

 

181,053

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross Profit

 

 

194,287

 

 

89,498

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling Expenses

 

 

38,528

 

 

67,604

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and Administrative Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

188,210

 

 

180,819

 

 

Total General and Administrative Expenses

 

 

188,210

 

 

180,819

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Operating Expenses

 

 

226,738

 

 

248,423

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Loss from Operations

 

 

(32,451)

 

 

(158,925)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Other Income (Expense)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Interest Income

 

 

828

 

 

-

 

 

 Interest Expense

 

 

(16,717)

 

 

(17,155)

 

 

 Derivative Expense

 

 

(28,797)

 

 

-

 

 

 Amortization of Debt Discount

 

 

(130,038)

 

 

(16,150)

 

 

 Change in Fair Value of Derivative

 

 

6,278

 

 

14,400

 

 

 Amortization of Deferred Financing Costs

 

 

(20,772)

 

 

-

 

 

 

Total Other Income (Expense)

 

 

(189,218)

 

 

(18,905)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Net loss

 

$

(221,669)

 

$

(177,830)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Net Loss Per Common Share - Basic and Diluted

 

$

(0.00)

 

$

(0.02)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Basic and Diluted

 

 

48,989,242

 

 

11,773,586


See notes to financial statements.



73



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL ,INC.

 Statement of Stockholders' Equity

For the  Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Common Stock

 Additional

Paid-in

Capital

 Accumulated

Deficit

 Total

Stockholders'

Equity

 

 Shares

Amount

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance - January 1, 2010

4,308,625

$  4,308

$  1,675,042

$  (2,097,121)

$  (417,771)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for professional services

135,499

135

97,925

-

98,060

Issuance of common stock for related party debt and accrued interest

157,142

158

401,602

-

401,760

Issuance of common stock for cash ($30,000) and financing costs ($60,000)

125,000

125

89,875

-

90,000

Issuance of common stock for deferred offering costs

92,593

93

499,907

-

500,000

Issuance of common stock for payment of debt

1,190,249

1,190

698,809

-

699,999

Issuance of common stock for payment of accounts payable

714,473

714

246,286

-

247,000

Issuance of common stock for share liability

375,000

375

179,625

-

180,000

Issuance of common stock for accrued compensation

3,232,020

3,232

67,601

-

70,833

Issuance of common stock for debt conversion

828,973

829

64,921

-

65,750

  Net loss

-

-

-

(838,999)

(838,999)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance - December 31, 2010

11,159,574

11,159

4,021,593

(2,936,120)

1,096,632

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common and preferred  stock:

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for accrued compensation

1,988,054

1,988

21,570

-

23,558

Issuance of common stock for debt conversion

19,236,424

19,237

281,139

-

300,376

Issuance of common stock for professional services

533,553

534

34,147

-

34,681

Issuance of common stock for payment of accounts payable

1,040,133

1,040

30,060

-

31,100

Issuance of common stock for deferred offering cost

2,136,111

2,136

49,114

-

51,250

Common stock issuable for deferred offering cost

5,208,333

5,208

88,542

-

93,750

  Net loss

-

-

-

(408,328)

(408,328)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance - December 31, 2011

41,302,182

41,302

4,526,165

(3,344,448)

1,223,019

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock for debt conversion

19,199,208

19,199

116,033

-

135,232

 Reclassification of derivative liability associated with convertible debt

-

-

27,373

-

27,373

 Net loss

-

-

-

(221,669)

(221,669)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Balance - March 31, 2012

60,501,390

$  60,501

$  4,669,571

$  (3,566,117)

$  1,163,955

See notes to financial statements.


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL ,INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

For the Three Months Ended

 

 

March 31, 2012

 

March 31, 2011

 

Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

$

(221,669)

 

$

(177,830)

 

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and Amortization

5,370

12,242

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

-

-

Amortization of Debt Discount and Debt Issue Costs

150,810

16,150

Derivative Expense

28,797

-

Change in fair value of derivative liabilities

(6,278)

(14,400)

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase) decrease in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts Receivable

 

2,070

 

 

54,901

 

Inventory

 

(145,265)

 

 

115,009

 

Prepaid Expenses

 

(11,570)

 

 

(18,164)

 

Other Receivable

 

65,000

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in:

 

-

 

 

 

 

Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

 

91,171

 

 

(132,393)

 

Net Cash Used In Operating Activities

 

(41,564)

 

 

(144,485)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Investing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital Expenditures

 

(10,640)

 

 

(8,617)

 

Proceeds From subsidiary

 

(828)

 

 

-

 

Proceeds from Sale of Subsidiary

 

-

 

 

37,500

 

Net Used In Investing Activities

 

(11,468)

 

 

28,883

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (Decrease) in Cash Overdraft

 

 

 

 

72,776

 

Advances of Bank Lines of Credit - Net

 

18,172

 

 

2,606

 

Proceeds from Convertible Debt

 

32,500

 

 

-

 

Repayments of Note Payable

 

(3,284)

 

 

(8,743)

 

Advances from Stockholder - Net

 

(101,842)

 

 

50,015

 

Repayments of Capital Leases

 

 

 

 

(5,314)

 

Deferred Offering Costs

 

(2,500)

 

 

-

 

Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities

 

(56,954)

 

 

111,340

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in Cash

 

(109,986)

 

 

(4,262)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash - Beginning of Periods

 

128,238

 

 

4,262

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash - End of Periods

$

18,252

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest

$

-

 

$

11,000

 

Cash paid for income taxes

$

-

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt Discount from Fair Value of Imbedded Derivative

$

32,500

 

$

12,478

 

Conversion of Convertible Debt and Accrued Interest for Common Stock

$

135,232

 

$

-

 

Issuance of Common Stock for Accrued Payroll - Related Party

$

-

 

$

23,558

 

Issuance of Common Stock for Convertible Debt and Accrued Interest

$

-

 

$

56,644

 

Reclassification of Derivative Liability to Additional Paid in Capital

$

27,373

 

$

-

 

Issuance of Convertible Note for Settlement Agreement

$

-

 

$

25,000


See notes to financial statements.

75



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)



[1] Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation


Nature of Operations - Bergio International, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on July 24, 2007 under the name Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc. On October 21, 2009, as a result of a Share Exchange Agreement, the corporate name was changed to Bergio International, Inc. and the Company implemented a 12-for-1 forward stock split of its common shares.  Effective December 27, 2010, the Company implemented a 1-for-12 reverse stock split.  All share and per share data has been adjusted to reflect such stock splits.  The Company is engaged in the product design, manufacturing, distribution of fine jewelry primarily in the United States and is headquartered from its corporate office in Fairfield, New Jersey. Based on the nature of operations, the Company’s sales cycle experiences significant seasonal volatility with the first two quarters of the year representing 15% - 25% of annual sales and the remaining two quarters representing the remaining portion of annual sales.


Basis of Presentation - The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements as of March 31, 2012, and for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted for interim financial statement presentation and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q.  Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statement presentation.  In the opinion of management, the financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position as of March 31, 2012, results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011.  The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.


[2] Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.


Revenue Recognition - Revenue is recognized upon the shipment of products to customers with the price to the buyer being fixed and determinable and collectability reasonably assured


Cash and Cash Equivalents - Cash equivalents are comprised of certain highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. The Company did not have any cash equivalents on hand at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.


Accounts Receivable - Accounts receivable is generated from sales of fine jewelry to retail outlets throughout the United States. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, accounts receivable were substantially comprised of balances due from retailers.


An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided against accounts receivable for amounts management believes may be uncollectible. The Company determines the adequacy of this allowance by regularly reviewing the composition of its accounts receivable aging and evaluating individual customer receivables, considering the customer’s financial condition, credit history and current economic circumstance. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 an allowance for doubtful accounts of $47,939 and $47,939 respectively has been provided.



76



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)



Inventories - Inventory consists primarily of finished goods and is valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the weighted average method and average cost is recomputed after each inventory purchase or sale.


Concentrations of Credit Risk - Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and accounts receivables. The Company places its cash with high credit quality financial institutions.  The Company, from time to time, maintains balances in financial institutions beyond the insured amounts.  At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had no cash balances beyond the federally insured amounts.


Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets into which the Company’s services are provided, as well as their dispersion across many different geographical areas.  As is characteristic of the Company’s business and of the jewelry industry generally, the Company extends its customers seasonal credit terms.  The carrying amount of receivables approximates fair value. The Company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers and believes its credit risk exposure on accounts receivable is limited. Based on management’s review of accounts receivable, an allowance for doubtful accounts has been recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. The Company does not require collateral to support these financial instruments.


Property and Equipment and Depreciation - Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from five (5) to seven (7) years.


Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred whereas expenditures for renewals and improvements that extend the useful life of the assets are capitalized. Upon the sale or retirement, the cost and the related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the respective accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reported within the Statements of Operations in the period of disposal.


Long-Lived Assets - In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, long-lived tangible assets subject to depreciation or amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets exceed their fair value as determined by an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows.


Losses on assets held for disposal are recognized when management has approved and committed to a plan to dispose of the assets, and the assets are available for disposal.


Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The Company follows guidance issued by the FASB on “Fair Value Measurements” for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.  This guidance establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to existing generally accepted accounting principles that require the use of fair value measurements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements.  


The FASB defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  Additionally, the FASB requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.




77



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)



These inputs are prioritized below:


·

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.


·

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.


·

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the use of the reporting entitys own assumptions.


The Company discloses the estimated fair value for all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair value.  As of March 31, 2012 the fair value of short-term financial instruments including cash overdraft, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximates book value due to their short-term maturity.  The fair value of property and equipment is estimated to approximate its net book value.  The fair value of debt obligations, other than convertible debt obligations, approximates their face values due to their short-term maturities and/or the variable rates of interest associated with the underlying obligations.

The following are the major categories of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis: as of March 31, 2012 and 2011, using quoted prices in active markets for identical liabilities (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):


 

 

March 31, 2012

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurement Using

 

Fair Value Measurement Using

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

 

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative Liabilities

$

-

310,230

-

310,230

$

-

282,584

-

282,584


In addition, the FASB issued, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.  This guidance expands opportunities to use fair value measurements in financial reporting and permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  The Company did not elect the fair value option for any of its qualifying financial instruments.


Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates - Investments in unconsolidated affiliates, in which the Company owns less than 20% or otherwise does not exercise significant influence, are stated at cost.  At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had an investment in which the Company owned less than 1% interest in an unconsolidated affiliate and therefore the investment is carried at cost.


Deferred Offering and Deferred Financing Costs - We defer certain costs associated with financing activities related to the issuance of equity securities (deferred offering costs) and debt securities (deferred financing costs). These costs consist primarily of legal, banking and other professional fees related to the transactions. Upon successful completion of the offering of equity securities, deferred offering costs are recorded as a reduction of the net proceeds in paid in capital. If the offering is not successful, such costs will be expensed. Deferred financing costs are amortized over the life of the related debt.



78



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)



Equity-Based Compensation - The Company accounts for equity based compensation transactions with employees under the provisions of ASC Topic No. 718, “Compensation: Stock Compensation” (“Topic No. 718”). Topic No. 718 requires the recognition of the fair value of equity-based compensation in net income. The fair value of common stock issued for compensation is measured at the market price on the date of grant.  The fair value of the Company’s equity instruments, other than common stocks, is estimated using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. This model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions and elections including expected stock price volatility and the estimated life of each award. In addition, the calculation of equity-based compensation costs requires that the Company estimate the number of awards that will be forfeited during the vesting period. The fair value of equity-based awards granted to employees is amortized over the vesting period of the award and the Company elected to use the straight-line method for awards granted after the adoption of Topic No. 718.


The Company accounts for equity based transactions with non-employees under the provisions of ASC Topic No. 505-50, “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees” (“Topic No. 505-50”). Topic No. 505-50 establishes that equity-based payment transactions with non-employees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of common stock issued for payments to non-employees is measured at the market price on the date of grant. The fair value of equity instruments, other than common stock, is estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. In general, the Company recognizes an asset or expense in the same manner as if it was to receive cash for the goods or services instead of paying with or using the equity instrument.


Advertising and Promotional Costs - Advertising and promotional costs are expensed as incurred and are recorded as part of Selling Expenses in the Statement of Operations.  The total cost for the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, was approximately $38,361 and $18,564, respectively.


During the year, the Company prepays costs associated with trade shows which are recorded as Prepaid Expenses in the Balance Sheet and are charged to the Statement of Operations upon the trade shows being conducted. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, approximately $638 and $27,000, respectively, of trade show expenses have been recorded.


Income Taxes - The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic No. 740 “Income Taxes” which requires the use of the liability method of accounting for income taxes. The liability method measures deferred income taxes by applying enacted statutory rates in effect at the balance sheet date to the differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts on the financial statements. The resulting deferred tax assets or liabilities are adjusted to reflect changes in tax laws as they occur. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.


Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share - Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing earnings  available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Dilutive earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could occur through the effect of common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options, warrants and convertible securities.  Equity instruments that may dilute earnings per share in the future are listed in Note 7. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, 73,943,422 and 8,035,391 shares, respectably, issuable upon the conversion of convertible debt were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share because their inclusion would be antidilutive.


Subsequent Events - The Company evaluated subsequent events, which are events or transactions that occurred after March 31, 2012 through the issuance of the accompanying financial statements.




79


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)



[3] New Authoritative Accounting Guidance


On May 12, 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04.  The ASU is the result of joint efforts by the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to develop a single, converged fair value framework.  Thus, there are few differences between the ASU and its international counterpart, IFRS 13.  This ASU is largely consistent with existing fair value measurement principles in U.S. GAAP; however it expands ASC 820’s existing disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and makes other amendments. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.  The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.


On June 16, 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, which revises the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements.  The new guidance removes the presentation options in ASC 220 and requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements.  The ASU does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income.  The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.  The adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.


Management does not believe that any other recently issued but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have an effect on the accompanying financial statements.


[4] Property and Equipment


Property and equipment and accumulated depreciation and amortization are as follows:


 

March 31,

December 31,

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

Selling Equipment

$  8,354

 

$  8,354

Office and Equipment

365,662

 

355,027

Leasehold Improvements

7,781

 

7,781

Furniture and Fixtures

18,487

 

18,487

 

 

 

 

Total - At Cost

400,284

 

389,646

Less: Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization

289,417

 

285,049

 

 

 

 

     Property and Equipment - Net

$  109,867

 

$  104,597


Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $5,370 and $12,242, respectively.





80



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)



[5] Notes Payable


 

March 31,

December 31,

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable due in equal monthly installments, monthly payments of $2,500 and one payment on June 30, 2011 equal to the outstanding balance; interest rate of 7.60%.  The notes are collateralized by the assets of the Company. (1)

$

-

 

$

91,517

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes payable due in equal monthly installments, over 60 months, Maturing through April 2014 at interest rates of 10.52%.  The notes are collateralized by specific assets of the Company.

 

48,342

 

 

51,626

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

48,342

 

 

51,626

Less: Current Maturities Included in Current Liabilities

 

25,477

 

 

20,591

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Total Long-Term Portion of Debt

$

22,865

 

$

31,035


(1) Terms are per the Post Judgment Payment and Forbearance Agreement dated October 9, 2009 between the company and the bank.  In the event of a default, the bank may immediately enforce its rights of collection for the full amount under the judgment, less credits for payment made through the date of default. The note payable was paid off in November 2011 through an assignment of a convertible debt agreement with Panache Capital, LLC.


[6] Bank Lines of Credit


A summary of the Company’s credit facilities is as follows:


 

March 31,

December 31,

 

2012

2011

Credit line of $75,000 as of December 16, 2011, due June 1, 2012.  Monthly payments of accrued unpaid interest due beginning February 1, 2012.  Principal plus all accrued unpaid interest due on June 1, 2012.  Interest rate is bank’s prime rate plus 1.75%, minimum of 5.75%.  Collateralized by the assets of the company.

$

20,500

$

--

 

 

 

 

 

Various unsecured Credit Cards of $161,000, minimum payment of principal and interest are due monthly at the credit card’s annual interest rate. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 201, the interest rates ranged from 3.99% to 8.75%.

 

101,998

 

104,326

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

122,498

 

104,326

 

 

 

 

 

Less:  Current maturities included in current liabilities

 

122,498

 

104,326

 

 

 

 

 

Total Long-Term Portion

$

--

$

--




81



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)



The Company’s CEO and majority shareholder also serves as a guarantor of the Company’s debt.


(1) Terms are per the Post Judgment Payment and Forbearance Agreement dated October 9, 2009 between the company and the bank.  In the event of a default, the bank may immediately enforce its rights of collection for the full amount under the judgment, less credits for payment made through the date of default. The credit line was paid off in November 2011 through an assignment and convertible debt agreement with Asher Enterprises, Inc.


[7] Convertible Debt


Asher


In February 13, 2012, the Company issued an 8% convertible note (the “February 2012 Note”) in the amount of $32,500 to Asher Enterprises, Inc. (“Asher”).  The principal and accrued interest is payable on January 12, 2013 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.   The note is convertible by Asher at any time after the six month anniversary of the issue date and by the Company at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 60% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.


In July 2011, the Company issued an 8% convertible note (the “July 2011 Note”) in the amount of $32,500 to Asher.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on April 18, 2012 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.   The note is convertible by Asher at any time after the six month anniversary of the issue date and by the Company at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 62.5% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the convertible note and $1,300 of accrued interest were converted into 4,551,780 shares of common stock.


In August 2011, the Company issued an 8% convertible note (the “August 2011 Note”) in the amount of $32,500 to Asher.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on May 29, 2012 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.   The note is convertible by Asher at any time after the six month anniversary of the issue date and by the Company at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 60.0% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the convertible note and $1,300 of accrued interest were converted into 4,909,787 shares of common stock.


In September 2011, the Company issued an 8% convertible note (the “September 2011 Note”) in the amount of $37,500 to Asher.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on June 28, 2012 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Asher at any time after the six month anniversary of the issue date and by the Company at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 62.5% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.


In November 2011, the Company issued an 8% convertible note (the “November 2011 Note #2”) in the amount of $32,500 to Asher.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on September 5, 2012 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Asher at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in agreement. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 61% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.

On February 1, 2010, the Company issued an 8% secured convertible note (the “February 2010 Note”) in the amount of $50,000 to Asher Enterprises, Inc. (“Asher”).  The principal and accrued interest is payable on January 2, 2011 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Asher at any time after the six month anniversary of the issue date and by the Company at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in the agreement.   The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 62.5% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten trading day period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.  In 2010, $47,000 of the principal was converted into 538,829 shares of company common stock.  In January 2011, the balance of the convertible note of $3,000 and $2,000 of accrued interest was converted into 100,000 shares of common stock.



82



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)



On March 12, 2010, the Company issued an 8% secured convertible note (the “March 2010 Note”) in the amount of $30,000 to Asher.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on December 13, 2010 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement. The note is convertible by Asher at any time after the six month anniversary of the issue date and by the Company at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in the agreement.   The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 62.5% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten trading day period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.  In February and March 2011, the convertible note of $30,000 and accrued interest of $1,200 was converted into 1,121,975 shares of common stock.

Asher is entitled to have all shares issued upon conversion of the above notes listed upon each national securities exchange or other automated quotation system, if any, upon which shares of the Company common stock are then listed.


Strategic


In May 2011, the Company issued a 15% convertible note (the “May 2011 Note”) in the amount of $50,000 to Strategic Business Initiatives, LLC (“Strategic”). The principal and accrued interest is payable on November 30, 2011 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement. The Company must give 10 days’ notice to Strategic about its intent to prepay the note. During the ten day period, prior to the Company’s prepayment, Strategic has the option to convert all or a portion of the principal and/or accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 80% of the five day average closing price immediately prior to the conversion date.


In November 2011, the Company settled the note in full through an exchange agreement with Genesis Capital Management, LLC. (see below).


Panache


In November 2011, the Company issued a 10% convertible Note (the “November 2011 Note #3”) in the amount of $50,000 to Panache Capital, LLC (“Panache”).  The principal and accrued interest is payable on November 16, 2012 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Panache at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in agreement.  The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 65% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.


In November 2011, the Company issued a 10% convertible note (the “November 2011 Note #4”) in the amount of $75,000 to Panache in consideration for payment of a note payable (See Note 5).  The principal and accrued interest is payable on November 16, 2012 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Panache at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in agreement. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 65% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.  In November and December 2011, $16,369 of principal was converted into 1,100,000 shares of common stock. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, $41,589 of principal was converted into 5,475,000 shares of common stock.


Caesar


In November 2011, the Company issued a 12% convertible note (the “November 2011 Note #5”) in the amount of $31,000 to Caesar Capital Group, LLC (“Caesar”).  The principal and accrued interest is payable on August 11, 2012 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Caesar at any time after the six month anniversary of the issue date with conversion periods as defined in agreement. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 35% of the lesser of closing bid price one day prior to conversion or the average of the five trading days one day prior to conversion.



83



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)



TCA Global


In November 2011, the Company issued a 12% convertible note (the “November 2011 Note #6”) in the amount of $200,000 to TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (“TCA Global”). The principal and accrued interest is payable on December 22, 2012 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement. The note is convertible by TCA Global at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in agreement. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 95% of the average of the five lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.


Genesis


In November 2011, the Company issued an 8% convertible note (the “November 2011 Note #7”) in the amount of $64,643 through an exchange agreement with Genesis Capital Management, LLC (“Genesis”). The new note settled in full the note with Strategic in the principal amount of $50,000 plus accrued interest of $3,869. In addition, the Company incurred finance costs of $10,774.The principal and accrued interest is payable on November 30, 2012 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement. The note is convertible by Genesis at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in agreement. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 65% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion. In December 2011, $36,000 of principal was converted into 2,517,483 shares of common stock.  During the three months ended March 31, 2012, $28,643 of principal was converted into 4,262,641 shares of common stock.


In November 2011, the Company issued a 10% convertible note (the “November 2011 Note #8”) in the amount of $60,000 to Genesis.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on June 1, 2012 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement.  The note is convertible by Genesis at any time after issue with conversion periods as defined in agreement. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 65% of the average of the three lowest trading prices of the stock during the ten day trading period ending one day prior to the date of conversion.

Tangiers

Effective January 2011, the Company entered into a 7% convertible promissory note agreement (the “January 2011 Note”) in the amount of $25,000 with Tangiers Capital, LLC (“Tangiers”) for the settlement of an accrued termination fee related to the securities purchase agreement with Tangiers. The principal and accrued interest is payable on June 18, 2012 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement. The note, including any accrued interest, is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 80% of the lowest trading price, determined on the then current trading market for the Company’s common stock, for the ten trading days prior to conversion, at the option of the holder. In March 2011, $12,500 of the convertible note was converted into 762,195 shares of common stock. At March 31, 2011, the balance of the note is $12,500.

On November 16, 2009, the Company issued a 7% Secured Convertible Debenture (the “November 2009 Debenture”) in the amount of $25,000 to Tangiers. The principal and accrued interest is payable on August 16, 2010 or such earlier date as defined in the agreement. Upon issuance, the November 2009 Debenture, including any accrued interest, was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 80% of the average of the two lowest trading prices, determined on the then current trading market for the Company’s common stock, for the ten trading days prior to conversion, at the option of the holder. The holder is entitled to “piggyback” registration rights on shares of common stock issued upon conversion.  During the year ended December 31, 2010, $18,750 of the convertible note was converted into 290,144 shares of common stock. In February 2011, the balance of the note of $6,250 and accrued interest of $1,694 was converted into 141,839 shares of common stock.



84



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)



The Company accounts for the fair value of the conversion features in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging; Embedded Derivatives” (“Topic No. 815-15”). Topic No. 815-15 requires the Company to bifurcate and separately account for the conversion features as an embedded derivative contained in the Company’s convertible debt. The Company is required to carry the embedded derivative on its balance sheet at fair value and account for any unrealized change in fair value as a component of results of operations. The Company valued the embedded derivative using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The fair values upon issuance of the January 2011 Note of $12,478, April 2011 Note of $32,704, May 2011 Note of $16,570, July 2011 Note of $30,962, August 2011 Note of $32,500, September 2011 Note of $21,507, November 2011 Note of $28,344, November 2011 Note #2 of $32,500, November 2011 Note #3 of $12,488, November 2011 Note #4 of $18,731, November 2011 Note #5 of $31,000, November 2011 Note #6 of $22,982, November 2011 Note #7 of $64,643 November 2011 Note #8 of $34,028, and February 13, 2012 Note #9 of $61,297 were recorded as a derivative liability and a discount to the convertible debt. Amortization of debt discount amounted to $130,038 and $16,150 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, respectively. The derivative liability is revalued each reporting period using the Black-Scholes model. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recorded an unrealized gain from the change in the fair value of the derivative liability of $6,278 and $14,400, respectively.  Convertible debt as of March 31, 2012 ($460,542) and December 31, 2011 ($563,274), is shown net of debt discount in the amount of $101,185 and $198,723, respectively.

The Black-Scholes model was valued with the following inputs:


·

Stock Price - The Stock Price was based on the average closing price of the Companys stock as of the Valuation Date. Stock Prices ranged from $0.01 to $0.02 in the period 1-01-2012 through 3-31-12.


·

Variable Conversion Price - The variable conversion price was based on: (i) 80% of the lowest Stock Price out of the last 10 trading days prior to the Valuation Date (Tangiers); (ii) 62.5%, 61% and 60% of the average of the 3 lowest Stock Prices out of the last 10 trading days prior to the Valuation Date (Asher); (iii) 80% of the 5 day average Stock Price for the last 5 trading days prior to Valuation Date (Strategic); (iv) 35% of the lesser of Stock Price 1 day prior to conversion or the average of the 5 trading days 1 day prior to Valuation Date (Caesar); (v) 65% of the average of the 3 lowest Stock Prices out of the last 10 trading days prior to the Valuation Date (Panache) and (Genesis) and (vi) 95% of the average of the 5 lowest Stock Price during the 10 trading days ending 1 day prior to the Valuation Date (TCA Global) ,(vii) 60% of the average of the 10 lowest Stock Price during the 10 trading days ending 1 day prior to the Valuation Date (Asher).


·

Time to Maturity - The time to maturity was determined based on the length of time between the Valuation Date and the maturity of the debt.  Time to maturity ranged from 12 months to 0 months in the period 1-01-2012 through 3-31-12.


·

Risk Free Rate - The risk free rate was based on the Treasury Note rates as of the Valuation Dates with term commensurate with the remaining term of the debt. The risk free rate ranged from 0.10% to 1.20% in the period 1-01-2012 through 3-31-12.


·

Volatility - The volatility was based on the historical volatility of three comparable companies as historical volatility of the Company was not useful in developing the expected volatility due to the limited trading history of its stock. The average volatility for the comparable companies ranged from 42% to94% in the period from January 1, 2012 through March 31, 2012.


[8] Equipment Held Under Capital Leases


The Company’s equipment held under the capital lease obligations as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is summarized as follows:


 

March  31,

December 31,

 

2012

2011

Showroom Equipment

$

40,000

$

40,000

Less: Accumulated Amortization

 

34,649

 

32,667

 

 

 

 

 

     Equipment Held under Capitalized Lease Obligations - Net

$

5,351

$

7,333


Amortization related to the equipment held under capital leases is calculated using the straight-line method over the five year useful lives of the assets.  For the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, amortization was approximately $1,983 and $2,000, respectively.


The capital lease obligation was paid in full during 2011.




85



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)



[9] Stockholders’ Equity


In March 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,909,787 shares of common stock to Asher for conversion of its convertible debt.  The shares are valued at $32,500.


In January and February 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,551,780 shares of common stock to Asher for conversion of its convertible debt.  The shares are valued at $32,500.


The Company is authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $.001 per share and 51 shares of preferred stock, par value $.001 per share. At March 31, 2012 and 2011, there were 60,501,390 and 41,302,182 common shares issued and outstanding, respectively. In October 2009, the Company affected a 12 for 1 forward split of its common stock. Effective December 27, 2010, the Company implemented a 1-for-12 reverse stock split.  All share and per share data has been retroactively adjusted to reflect such stock splits. Effective September 1, 2011, the Company authorized and issued 51 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 to its CEO (see Note 10).  The Series A Preferred Stock pays no dividends and has no conversion rights. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock has voting rights such that the holder of 51 shares of Series A Preferred Stock will effectively maintain majority voting control of the Company.


In March 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,988,054 shares of common stock valued at $23,558 to its Chief Executive Officer pursuant to his employment agreement (see Note 10).


During fiscal 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 13,511,848 shares of common stock to Asher for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest as follows: February 2010 Note remaining debt of $3,000, March 2010 Note of $30,000 and accrued interest of $3,200, April 2010 Note of $40,000 and accrued interest of $3,121, May 2010 Note of $40,000 and accrued interest of $2,849, April 2011 Note of $50,000 and accrued interest of $2,000 and November 2011 Note of $39,522.  The shares are valued at $213,692 (see Note 7).


In February, March and April 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,107,093 shares of common stock to Tangiers for full conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest. The notes and accrued interest were November 2009 Note remaining debt of $6,250 plus accrued interest of $1,694 and June 2010 Note of $25,000 plus accrued interest of $1,371. The shares are valued at $34,315 (see Note 7).


In August 2011, the Company issued 533,553 shares of common stock for payment of legal fees.  The shares are valued at $34,681, the fair value at date of issuance.


In October 2011, the Company issued 400,000 shares of common stock for deferred offering costs.  The shares are valued at $20,000, the fair value at date of issuance.


In November 2011, the Company issued 1,040,133 shares of common stock for payment of accounts payable.  The shares are valued at $31,100.


In November and December 2011, the Company issued 1,100,000 shares of common stock to Panache for partial conversion of its November 2011 Note #4 of $75,000 convertible debt.  The shares are valued at $16,369 (See Note 7).


In December 2011, the Company issued 2,517,483 shares of common stock to Genesis for partial conversion of its November 2011 Note #7 of $64,643 convertible debt. The shares are valued at $36,000 (See Note 7).



86



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)



In December 2011, the Company issued 1,736,111 shares of common stock to TCA Global for deferred offering cost. The shares are valued at $31,250. The Company also recorded 5,208,333 common shares issuable to TCA Global for deferred offering costs. The shares are valued at $93,750 (See Note 11).


In January 2010, the Company finalized a Securities Purchase Agreement with Tangiers Investments, LP (“Tangiers”) (See Note 11).  Pursuant to the agreement the Company issued Tangiers 92,593 shares of common stock valued at the market price of $500,000 for a one-time commitment fee.


In January 2010, the Company issued 157,142 shares of common stock to Caesar Capital Group, LLC (“Caesar”) to settle approximately $402,000 of stockholder advances and accrued interest.


In February 2010, the Company sold 125,000 shares of common stock to Caesar for $30,000.  The value of the stock on the date of sale based on the market price was $90,000 and the Company recorded an expense for financing costs of $60,000.


In February 2010, through an agreement with Socius CG II, Ltd (“Socius”), the Company settled a $699,999 payment of its credit line with Columbia Bank with the issuance of 1,190,249 shares of common stock to Socius.


In 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 19,666 shares of common stock for legal services rendered for the registration of securities with the SEC.  The shares are valued at $23,160 the market price, and are recorded as financing costs.


In March 2010, the Company issued 90,833 shares of common stock to a consultant for services rendered.  The shares are valued at the market price of $62,900 and are recorded as share-based consulting expense.


In 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 714,473 shares of common stock to Socius for settlement of approximately $247,000 in payables.


In April 2010, the Company issued 25,000 shares of common stock for accounting services rendered for the registration of securities with the SEC.  The shares are valued at $12,000 and are recorded as financing costs.


In April 2010, the Company issued 375,000 shares of common stock valued at $180,000 to settle share liability.  The accrued share liability was expensed as share based services.


In 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 3,232,020 shares of common stock to its Chief Executive Officer pursuant to his employment agreement (see Note 11).


In 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 538,829 shares of common stock to Asher for partial conversion of its convertible debt.  The shares are valued at $47,000.


In 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 290,144 shares of common stock to Tangiers Capital, LLC for partial conversion of its convertible debt.  The shares are valued at $18,750.





87



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)



[10] Related Party Transactions


The Company receives periodic advances from its principal stockholder based upon the Company’s cash flow needs. At March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, $221,244 and $323,086, respectively was due to the shareholder.  Interest expense is accrued at an average annual market rate of interest which was 3.94% and 3.25% at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.  No terms for repayment have been established. As a result, the amount is classified as a Current Liability.


In the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,988,054 and 3,232,020 shares of common stock to its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), in accordance with his employment agreement (See Note 11), respectively. The shares are valued at $23,558 and $70,833 the amount of unpaid compensation owed the CEO, respectively.


[11] Commitment and Contingencies


Employment Agreement - Effective February 28, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its CEO.  The agreement, which is for a five year term, provides for an initial base salary of $175,000 per year with a 3% annual increase thereafter (the “Base Salary”).  The CEO is also entitled to certain bonuses based on net profits before taxes and other customary benefits, as defined in the agreement.In addition, since it is understood that the Company is employing the CEO during a time of economic decline throughout the U.S. and at times and from time to time, the Company may not be in a position to pay the full amount of Base Salary owed the CEO it is understood and agreed to by the Board, that as long as the Company is unable to pay the CEO the full amount of his Base Salary that the Board shall issue to him, from time to time, an amount of shares that will allow him to remain in possession of fifty-one percent (51%) of the Company’s then outstanding common stock.  Such issuances shall be made to the CEO at any time when his total share holdings are reduced to an amount less than fifty-one percent (51%) as a result of issuance of shares made on behalf of the Company. The CEO waived the 3% annual increase for 2011.


Effective September 1, 2011, the Company and CEO entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the “Amended Agreement”) which primarily retains the term and compensation of the original agreement. The Amended Agreement, however, removes the section which previously provided for the issuance of Company common stock to the CEO, from time to time, when the Company is unable to pay the CEO the full amount of his Base Salary which would allow the CEO to maintain a fifty-one percent (51%) share of the Company’s outstanding common stock.  However, the CEO does have the right to request all or a portion of his unpaid Base Salary be paid with the Company’s restricted common stock. In addition, the Amended Agreement provides for the issuance of 51 shares of newly authorized Series A Preferred Stock to be issued to the CEO. As defined in the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series A Preferred Stock, each share of Series A Preferred Stock has voting rights such that the holder of 51 shares of 51 shares of Series A Preferred Stock will effectively maintain majority voting control of the Company. Effective November 3, 2011, the CEO notified the Company that for the one year period, retroactive from April 1, 2011, through March 31, 2012, he would reduce his Base Compensation to $100,000.


Operating Leases - The Company leases certain office and manufacturing facilities and equipment. The Company’s office and manufacturing facilities are currently leased on a month to month basis at $1,800 per month. The equipment lease agreements are non-cancelable and expire at various dates through 2011. All these leases are classified as operating leases. As of January 1, 2012, the Company is on a month to month lease.


Rent expense for the Company’s operating leases for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, was approximately $3,300 and $6,000, respectively.



88



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)



Acquisition - The Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Mario Panelli & C. s.a.s. (“Seller”), an Italian distributor of high-end jewelry, and Mario Panelli and Mogni Viviana (“Owners”), wherein the Company agreed to purchase substantially all the assetsinventory of the Seller. The Company agreed to pay the Seller an amount equal to 100% of the book value of the Seller’s inventory as determined in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The closing date which was originally scheduled for September 30, 2009 and was first extended 30 days until October 30, 2009, ishas been extended pending the Co mpanyCompany obtaining adequate financing to complete the transaction.


Litigation

Equity Financing Agreement- In January 2010, the Company finalized a securities purchase agreement with Tangiers Investors, LP (“Tangiers”) pursuant to which at its discretion the Company can periodically sell to Tangiers shares of common stock up to a maximum purchase of $25,000,000.  The selling price will be 88% of the lowest volume weighted average price, as defined in the agreement, for the five days immediately following the notice of sale date. In addition, the Company issued Tangiers 92,593 shares of common stock valued at $500,000 for a one-time commitment fee which is recorded as deferred offering costs.  Effective, June 22, 2010, the Company terminated the securities purchase agreement with Tangiers and recorded an expense of $535,160 as share-based financing costs which included the $500,000 commitment fee and $35,160 of professional fees related to a registration statement for common shares to be issued pursuant to the agreement, which was also terminated.


Consulting Agreement - The Company entered into an agreement for business development services with a consultant.  Pursuant to the agreement, the Company issued 375,000 shares of Company common stock for the services, which primarily were rendered in the normal coursefirst quarter of business, is involved2010.  The shares, which were issued in certain legal matters for which it carries insurance, subject to certain exclusions and deductibles.  AsApril 2010, are valued at the market price of December 31, 2009 and through the date of issuance of these financial statements, there was no asserted or unasserted litigation, claims or assessments warranting recognition and/or disclosure in the financial statements.

$180,000.


[13] Subsequent Events

Debt/

Committed Equity Agreements

Subsequent to year end,Facility Agreement - In November 2011, the Company entered into various debt restructuring and financing agreements as follows:

*In February 2010, through an agreement with Socius CG II, Ltd (“Socius”), the Company settled a $700,000 payment of its credit line with Columbia Bank with the issuance of 5,700,000 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment) to Socius.
*In January 2010, the Company finalized a securities purchase agreement with Tangiers Investors, LP (“Tangiers”) pursuant to which at its discretion the Company can periodically sell to Tangiers shares of common stock up to a maximum purchase of $25,000,000.  The selling price will be 88% of the lowest volume weighted average price, as defined in the agreement, for the five days immediately following the notice of sale date. In addition, the Company issued Tangiers 1,111,111 shares of common stock valued at $500,000 for a one-time commitment fee.
*In January 2010, through two agreements with Caesar Capital Group, LLC (Caesar”), the Company settled approximately $250,000 and $152,000 of stockholder loans through the issuance of 1,086,956 and 798,731 shares of common stock to Caesar.
*In March 2010, the Company settled approximately $247,000 in payables with the issuance of 7,800,000 shares of common stock to Socius and continues to work with Socius on the settlement of an additional approximate $750,000 of debt through the issuance of equity securities.



F-25 
61


BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC. (F/K/A ALBA MINERAL EXPLORATION, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Pro Forma Information [Unaudited]

The Company believes that the above transactions, when completed, will have a beneficial affect on its working capital and overall balance sheet. Following represents a pro forma summary balance sheet assuming that the above transactions with Socius and Ceasar were completed as of December 31, 2009 (there can be no assurance that such transactions will be completed in the subsequent period):

  
Actual
December 31, 2009
  
Pro Forma
Adjustments
  
Pro Forma
December 31, 2009
 
          
Current assets $1,722,903  $--  $1,722,903 
Other assets  165,307   --   165,307 
Total assets $1,888,210  $--  $1,888,210 
             
Current liabilities $2,100,386  $(1,950,000) $150,386 
Long-term liabilities  205,595   (150,000)  55,595 
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)  (417,771)  2,100,000   1,682,229 
             
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit) $1,888,210  $--  $1,888,210 


Employment Agreement
Effective January 4, 2010, the Company entered into an employmentcommitted equity facility agreement with its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The agreement, which is for a five year term, provides for an initial base salaryTCA Global to issue and sell from time to time up to $2,500,000 of $175,000 per year with a 3% annual increase thereafter. The CEO is also entitledthe Company’s common stock at 95% of the market price to certain bonuses based on revenue growth and net profits and other customary benefits,TCA Global, as defined in the agreement.
The Company incurred a non-refundable facility fee of $125,000 (5%) payable in shares of the Company’s common stock which was recorded as deferred offering cost. The fee is to be paid in four quarterly installments.  The Company issued 1,736,111 shares of common stock valued at $31,250 for the first installment at the date of execution of the agreement.  The Company has also recorded common stock issuable for the remaining three installments in the amount of 5,208,333 common shares valued at $93,750.  The number of shares of common stock issuable will be adjusted based on the future market value of the common stock, as defined in the agreement.

Litigation - The Company is currently a defendant in a litigation filed by Moti Ganz USA, Ltd., as plaintiff, involving the return of a piece of jewelry valued at approximately $12,000.  The Company is currently finalizing negotiations to have the jewelry returned.


Other
On February 23, 2010,

The Company is currently a plaintiff in a litigation filed against Macau Consultants and Advisory Services, Inc., Diamond International, Inc., Stanley Larson, Merlin Larson, Dennis Atkins, Paul Crawford, et al, as defendants.  The litigation involves the sale of Diamond International, Inc. to Macau Consultants and Advisory Services, Inc. for a purchase price of $225,000. A past due receivable balance of $137,500 was due to the Company amended its Certificateat December 31, 2011.  Subsequent to December 31, 2011, the Company received a payment of Incorporation$65,000, leaving a remaining balance of $72,500.

Other than the matters described above, we are currently not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to increase the numberknowledge of authorizedthe executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.



89



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

MARCH 31, 2012

(UNAUDITED)



[12] Subsequent Events


In April 2012, the Company issued 9,103,562 shares of common stock for conversion of debt. The shares are valued at $35,655 pursuant to 200,000,000.

the terms of the various convertible debt agreements.























F-26 
62



PART II


INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

Item 13.Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution


Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution


We will pay all expenses in connection with the registration and sale of the common stock by the selling shareholder. The estimated expenses of this offering in connection with the issuance and distribution are set forth below.


SEC filing fee

 

$

7.22

 

Legal expenses

 

$

25,000

*

Accounting expenses

 

$

10,000

*

Miscellaneous

 

$

5,000

*

Total

 

$

40,007.22

*


* Estimate


Indemnification of the securities being registered, allDirectors and Officers


Our certificate of which are to be paid by the Registrant, are as follows:

Registration Fee $  100.83 
Legal Fees and Expenses $35,000.00 
Accounting Fees and Expenses $14,800.00 
Total $49,900.83 

Item 14.Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Our Articles of Incorporation includeincorporation and bylaws provide that we will indemnify an indemnification provision under which we have agreed to indemnify our directors and officers from and against certain claims arising from or related to future acts or omissions as aofficer, director, or former officer of the Company.  Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Company pursuantor director, to the foregoing, or otherwise, wefull extent permitted by law. We have been advised that in the opinion of the SEC suchU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.
Item 15.Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities is asserted by one of our directors, officers, or controlling persons in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our legal counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit the question of whether such indemnification is against public policy to a court of appropriate jurisdiction. We will then be governed by the court’s decision.


Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities


During the past three years, the Company has hadwe have issued the following unregistered salessecurities which were not registered under the Securities Act.  Unless otherwise indicated, all of its securities:

the share issuances described below were made in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for transactions not involving a public offering.


2010
In

On January 30, 2009, we issued 26,261 shares of our restricted common stock, with a fair value of $1.83 per share or $48,000, to our outside securities counsel for services rendered in connection with the Shareeffective filing of Form 15c-211 and submittal to FINRA through a market maker.


On February 11, 2009, we issued 10,942 shares of our common stock, with a fair value of $1.83 per share or $20,000, to our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman for services rendered as the Chairman of the our Board of Directors throughout the 2009 fiscal year.


On October 19, 2009, in connection with the Exchange Agreement, dated October 19, 2009,we issued to the previous shareholders of Diamond Information Institute Inc. received 2,585,1751,723,450 shares of our common stock (31,022,100in exchange for all of the outstanding shares post 12 for 1 split)of Diamond Information Institute.


On November 16, 2009, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Tangiers Agreement”) with Tangiers Capital, LLC (“Tangiers”)The 2,585,175Pursuant to the Tangiers Agreement, we may, at our discretion, periodically sell to Tangiers shares of our common stock which were issuedfor a total purchase price of up to $25,000,000.   Pursuant to the former holdersTangiers Agreement, on December 16, 2009, and finalized on January 22, 2010, the Company issued Tangiers  92,593 shares of common stock valued at the market price of Diamond Information Institute, Inc. were done so in reliance on$500,000 as a one-time commitment fee.  On June 22, 2010, we mutually agreed with Tangiers to terminate the exemption from registration afforded by Section 4(2)Tangiers Agreement.


On January 12, 2010, through two agreements with Caesar Capital Group, LLC (Caesar”), we settled approximately



91



$250,000 and $152,000 of stockholder loans through the Securities Act.

Inissuance of 90,580 and 66,561 shares of common stock, respectively, to Caesar.


On February 9, 2010, through an agreement with Socius CG II, Ltd (“Socius”), we settled a $700,000 payment of our credit line with Columbia Bank with the issuance of 5,700,0001,190,249 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment) to Socius.  The offer and sale of the securities above were effected in reliance on Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act based on the court’s approval of the issuance of the shares and that the terms and conditions of the exchange of the shares for the release of the claims was fair, reasonable and adequate (procedurally and substantively) to the plaintiffs.


On January 25, 2010, March 3, 2010, March 9, 2010 and March 16, 2010, we issued 4,167, 7,167, 70,000 and 20,833 shares of common stock to two individuals for consulting and legal services rendered for the registration of securities with the SEC.


In February 2010, the Company sold 125,000 shares of common stock to Caesar for $30,000.  The value of the stock on the date of sale based on the market price was $90,000 and the Company recorded an expense for financing costs of $60,000.

On April 8, 2010, we settled approximately $247,000 in payables with the issuance of 650,000 shares of common stock to Socius.  On May 15, 2010, an additional 64,473 shares were issued.  The offer and sale of the securities above were effected in reliance on Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 based on the court’s approval of the issuance of the shares and that the terms and conditions of the exchange of the shares for the release of the claims was fair, reasonable and adequate (procedurally and substantively) to the plaintiffs.

In January


On April 15, 2010, through two agreements with Caesar Capital Group, LLC (Caesar”), we settled approximately $250,000 and $152,000 of stockholder loans through the issuance of 1,086,956 and 798,731issued 375,000 shares of common stock to Caesar.  The shares of our common stock were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act,a consultant for services previously rendered and Rule 506 promulgated thereunder.

Inrecorded as share liability at March 31, 2010.  


On April 16, 2010, we settled approximately $247,000 in payables with the issuance of 7,800,000issued 1,392,692 shares of common stock to Sociusour CEO pursuant to his employment agreement.


On April 12, 2010 and April 21, 2010, we continue to work with Socius on the settlement of an additional approximate $750,000 of debt through the issuance of equity securities. The offer and sale of the securities above were effected in reliance on Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933 based on the court’s approval of the issuance of the shares and that the terms and conditions of the exchange of the shares for the release of the claims was fair, reasonable and adequate (procedurally and substantively) to the plaintiffs.



63


2009

In January 2009, the Company agreed to issue its SEC counsel, 100,000 shares of restricted common stock with a fair value of $0.40 per share or $40,000 for services in connection with the effective filing of Form 15c-211 and submittal to FINRA through a market maker. The Share-Based Compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 amounted to $0 and $40,000, respectively.

In February 2009, the Company issued to its CEO 50,000 shares of restricted common stock with a fair value of $0.40 per share or $20,000 for services as a Board of Directors member throughout 2009.  The Share-based Compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 amounted to $5,000 and $15,000, respectively.
On November 16, 2009 we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Tangiers. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement the Company may, at its discretion, periodically sell to Tangiers shares of its common stock for a total purchase price of up to $25,000,000. For each share of common stock purchased under the Securities Purchase Agreement, Tangiers will pay  us 88% of the lowest volume weighted average price of the Company's common stock as quoted by Bloomberg, LP on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board or other principal market on which the Company's common stock is traded for the five days immediately following the notice date. The price paid by Tangiers for the Company's stock shall be determined as of the date of each individual request for an advance under the Securities Purchase Agreement. Tangiers’ o bligation to purchase shares of the Company's common stock under the Securities Purchase Agreement is subject to certain conditions, including the Company obtaining an effective registration statement for shares of the Company's common stock sold under the Securities Purchase Agreement and is limited to $250,000 per ten consecutive trading days after the advance notice is provided to Tangiers. The Securities Purchase Agreement shall terminate and Tangiers shall have no further obligation to make advances under the Securities Purchase Agreement at the earlier of the passing of 24 months after the date that the Securities and Exchange Commission declares the Company’s registration statement effective or the Company receives advances from Tangiers equal to the $25,000,000. Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, on December 16, 2009, Tangiers will receive a one-time commitment fee equal to $500,000 of the Company's common stock divided by the lowest volume weighted average price of the Company 's common stock during the 10 business days immediately following the date of the Securities Purchase Agreement, as quoted by Bloomberg, LP.  As of December 1, 2009, the shares of common stock to be issued in order to receive advances under the Securities Purchase Agreement upon issuance would equal approximately 30% of our outstanding common stock.  

2008
In January 2008, two Advisory Panel members and a Board of Director member received restricted common stock for services to be rendered throughout 2008.  The two Advisory Panel members received 50,000 and 100,000 shares, respectively, with a fair value of $1.00 per share or $150,000 while the Board of Director member received 50,000 shares with a fair value of $1.00 per share or $50,000.  For the year ended December 31, 2008, $200,000 was charged to the Statement of Operations as Share-based Compensation expense.

In January 2008, the Company issued 117,500 shares of restricted common stock with a fair value of $1.00 per share or $117,500 to employees.  Shares issued in connection with the Board of Director consent, were dispersed ratably over the first two quarters of 2008 as authorized in the consent.

In January and February 2008, the Company sold 600 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share to individual investees.

For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company issued to its SEC counsel, 450,000 shares of restricted common stock with a fair value of $1.00 per share or $450,000 for services previously rendered in connection with the effective filing of Form S-1 with the SEC.

2007

In April 2007, the Company entered into a Debt Conversion Agreement (the "Agreement") and issued 100,000 shares of common stock at $1 per share to a vendor as full satisfaction for accounts payable previously due and future services to be rendered.  Of the total $100,000 of common stock issued, $55,000 was to satisfy previous account payable balances and $45,000 was issued as consideration for future services to be rendered and is reflected in the Deferred Compensation caption of the stockholders' equity section of the Balance Sheet, of which approximately $14,000 and $31,000, respectively was expensed in 2008 and 2007. The shares have a one year restriction from sale or offering.

64


In June 2007, the Company entered into a Debt Conversion Agreement (the "Agreement") and issued 150,000 shares of common stock at a fair market value of $1 per share to a vendor as full satisfaction of an accounts payable balance of $150,000.  The shares have a one year restriction from sale or offering and the Agreement allows for the vendor to purchase for a period of 60 months from the date of closing of this Agreement 150,000 shares of common stock under "Class A" purchase warrants at $1.50 per share.  Through December 31, 2008, no "Class A" purchase warrants were exercised by the vendor.

During the second quarter of 2007, the Company conducted a private placement offering (the "Offering") of its common stock to Accredited Investors in accordance with SEC regulations.  The offering was up to 40 units at $25,000 per unit or $1,000,000 in total.  Each unit was composed of 25,000 shares of common stock8,333 and 25,000 "Class A" common stock purchase warrants to purchase additional shares at $1.50 per share.

During 2007, the Board of Directors ratified issuance of 50,000 restricted shares of common stock to the Company's CEO, also serving as a director, as compensation for services rendered through December 31, 2007.  The Board of Directors also ratified issuance of a total of 100,000 restricted shares of common stock to two individuals for consulting and legal services rendered for the registration of securities with the SEC.


On May 17, 2010, we issued 1,073,340 shares of common stock to our CEO pursuant to his employment agreement.


On July 21, 2010, we issued 327,264 shares of common stock to our CEO pursuant to his employee agreement.


On August 4, August 16, August 18 and August 24, 2010, we issued an aggregate of 231,530 shares of common stock to a convertible debt holder for the conversion of debt in the amount of $24,500.


On August 20, 2010, we issued 59,524 shares of common stock to a convertible debt holder for the conversion of debt in the amount of $6,250.


On August 30, 2010, we issued 215,334 shares of common stock to our CEO pursuant to his employee agreement.


On September 7 and September 23, 2010, we issued 63,131 shares and 94,697 shares, respectively, of common stock to a convertible debt holder for the conversion of debt in the amount $12,500.


On October 1, 2010, we issued 223,391 shares of common stock to our Chief Executive Officer pursuant to his employee agreement.


On October 4 and October 18, 2010, we issued 66,138 shares and 83,333 shares, respectively, of common stock to a convertible debt holder for the conversion of debt in the amount $10,000.


On October 29 and November 16, 2010, we issued 112,249 shares and 118,371 shares, respectively, of common stock to a convertible  debt holder for the conversion of debt in the amount $12,500.


On January 26, February 3, February 8, March 10 and March 22, 2011, we issued 100,000 shares, 200,000 shares,



92



238,663 shares, 437,158 shares and 246,154 shares for an aggregate of 1,221,975 shares of common stock to Asher for partial conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.


On February 8 and March 22, 2011, we issued 141,839 shares and 762,195 shares for an aggregate of 904,034 shares of common stock to Tangiers for partial conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.


On March 31, 2011, we issued an aggregate of 1,988,054 shares of common stock valued at $23,558 to its Chief Executive Officer pursuant to his employment agreement.


On April 1, April 6, April 12, April 20, April 26, April 29, May 4, May 26, June 10, June 23 and June 30, 2011, we issued 659,341 shares, 659,341 shares, 769,231 shares, 721,649 shares 448,718 shares, 589,041 shares, 684,932 shares, 720,000 shares, 707,965 shares, 705,128 shares, and 1,181,818 shares for an aggregate of 7,847,164 shares of common stock to Asher for partial conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.  The shares are valued at $85,970.


On April 18, 2011, we issued an aggregate of 1,203,059 shares of common stock to Tangiers for partial conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.  The shares are valued at $13,871.


On August 26, 2011, we issued 533,553 shares of common stock for payment of legal fees.  The shares are valued at $34,681, the fair value at date of issuance.


On October 17, 2011, we issued 400,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for professional services rendered.


On October 21, October 24, October 25, October 26 and November 1, 2011, we issued 338,983 shares, 421,941 shares, 578,512 shares, 330,579 shares and 439,650 shares of common stock to Asher for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest in the aggregate amount of $52,000.


On November 9, November 17, November 28, and December 2, 2011, we issued 389,105 shares, 662,252 shares, 712,758 shares and 569,109 shares of common stock to Asher for conversion of its convertible debt in the aggregate amount of $39,522.


On November 15, 2011, we issued an aggregate of 1,040,133 shares of common stock to Caesar for conversion of its convertible debt in the amount of $31,100.


On November 18 and December 19, 2011, we issued 500,000 shares and 600,000 shares of common stock to Panache Capital, LLC (“Panache”) for conversion of its convertible debt in the aggregate amount of $16,369.


On December 6, 2011, we issued 2,517,483 shares of common stock to Genesis Capital Management, LLC for conversion of its convertible debt in the amount of $36,000


On December 23, 2011, we issued 1,736,111 shares of common stock to TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP for payment of 25% ($31,250) of the Company's Advisory Panel Members as compensation for services rendered from January throughfacility fee per the Committed Equity Facility Agreement dated December 23, 2011.


As of 2007.


For the year ended December 31, 2007,2011, the Company valued their shares based on recentrecorded common stock transaction, and recorded $150,000 of stock based compensation expense which is reflected as part of General and Administrative expenses in the Statement of Operations.

In instances described above where we issued securities in reliance upon Regulation D, we relied upon Rule 506 of Regulation D of the Securities Act. These stockholders who received the securities in such instances made representations that (a) the stockholder is acquiring the securities for his, her or its own account for investment and not for the account of any other person and not with a view to or for distribution, assignment or resale in connection with any distribution within the meaning of the Securities Act, (b) the stockholder agrees not to sell or otherwise transfer the purchased shares unless they are registered under the Securities Act and any applicable state securities laws, or an exemption or exemptions from such registration are available, (c) the stockholder has knowledge and experience in financial and business matters such that he, she or it is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in us, (d) the stockholder had access to all of our documents, records, and books pertaining to the investment and was provided the opportunity to ask questions and receive answers regarding the terms and conditions of the offering and to obtain any additional information which we possessed or were able to acquire without unreasonable effort and expense, and (e) the stockholder has no need for the liquidity in its investment in us and could afford the complete loss of such investment. Management made the determination that the investors in instances where we relied on Regulation D are accredited investors (as defined in Regulation D) based upon management’s inquiry into their sophistication and net worth. In addition, there was no general solicitation or advertising for securities issued in reliance upon Regulation D.
In instances described above where we indicate that we relied upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act in issuing securities, our reliance was based upon the following factors: (a) the issuance of the securities was an isolated private transaction by us which did not involve a public offering; (b) there were only a limited number5,208,333 shares of offerees; (c) there were no subsequent or contemporaneous public offeringscommon stock to TCA Global Master Fund, LP for payment of 75% ($93,750) of the securities by us; (d)facility fee per the securities were not broken down into smaller denominations;Committed Equity Facility Agreement dated December 23, 2011.





On January 24, February 2, February 13, and (e)February 21, 2012 we issued 1,235,955 shares, 1,194,030 shares, 1,250,000 shares and 871,795 shares of common stock to Asher for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest in the negotiationsaggregate amount of $32,500.

On March 1, March 5, March 13, March 19, and March 28,  2012 we issued 1,408,451 shares, 821,918 shares, 1,410,256 shares, 818,182 shares and 450,980 shares of common stock to Asher for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest in the saleaggregate amount of $32,500.


On January 9, February 6, February 21, March 6 and March 26, 2012 we issued 750,000 shares, 1,000,000 shares, 1,000,000 shares, 1,375,000 shares and 1,350,000 shares of common stock to Panache for partial conversion of its convertible debt in the aggregate amount of $41,589.


On February 9 and March 5, 2012, we issued 1,923,076 shares and 2,339,565 shares of common stock took place directly betweento Genesis for conversion of its convertible debt in the offereeaggregate amount of $28,643.

On April 5, April 16, April 27, May 8, and us.

May 21, 2012 we issued 2,142,857 shares, 2,682,927 shares, 2,777,778 shares, 2,800,000 shares, and 869,565 shares of Common Stock to Asher for conversion of its convertible debt in the aggregate amount of $39,000.

On April 30 and June 4, 2012, we issued 1,500,000 shares and 1,500,000 shares of common stock to Panache for conversion of its convertible debt in the aggregate amount of $8,710.

On June 5, 2012, we issued 7,352,941 shares of common stock to Genesis for conversion of its convertible debt in the amount of $12,500.

On June 8, 2012, we issued 3,996,000 shares of common stock to Caesar Capital Group for conversion of its convertible debt in the amount of $33,058.74.

On June 11 and June 20, 2012, we issued 3,181,818 shares and 3,333,333 shares of common stock to Asher for conversion of its convertible debt in the aggregate amount of $14,000.



















EXHIBITS





65



Item 16.Exhibits
EXHIBIT

Exhibit No.

 DESCRIPTION

Description

 3.0

2.1

Share Exchange Agreement, dated October 19, 2009, by and between Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc. and Diamond Information Institute, Inc. (as filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 21, 2009)

2.2

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated October 20, 2009, by and among Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc., Owen Gibson, individually, Joan Gibson, individually, Darcy Brann, individually, Duane Schaffer, individually, Lindsay Devine, individually, and Dennis Rodowitz, individually (as filed as Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 21, 2009)

3.1

Articles of Incorporation, as amended Incorporated by reference(as filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, filed with the SEC on April 23, 20082008)

 3.1

3.2

Certificate of Amendment Incorporated by referenceto the Articles of Incorporation (as filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s 8KCurrent Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 22, 20092009)

 3.2

3.3

Bylaws, as amended Incorporated by reference(as filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, filed with the SEC on April 23, 20082008)

 5.1

Opinion of Legal Counsel  (to be filed by amendment)

 10

3.4

Securities Purchase Agreement, dated November 16, 2009, between

Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of the Company and Tangiers Investors, LP 

 10.1Registration Right Agreement dated November 16, 2009 betweenBergio International Inc. Series A Preferred Stock, as filed with the Company and Tangiers Investors, LP
 10.2Share Exchange Agreement between Diamond Information Institute and Alba Mineral Exploration dated October 19, 2009, Incorporated by referenceDelaware Secretary of State on September 2, 2011 (as filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s 8K filedCurrent Report on October 21, 2009.
 16.1Letter from Seale and Beers, CPAs, dated October 22, 2009 to the Securities and Exchange Commission Incorporated by reference as an Exhibit to the Company's 8K filed on October 27, 2009 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
 23.1Auditor's Consent
 23.2Consent of Legal Counsel(included in Exhibit 5.1)


Item 17.Undertakings


(A)
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes:
(1)
To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this Registration Statement:
(i)
To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;
(ii)
To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the Registration Statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment of the Registration Statement) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the Registration Statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectusForm 8-K, filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the "Calculatio n of Registration Fee" table in the effective registration statement; and
SEC on September 8, 2011)

(iii)

5.1

To include any material information with respect

Opinion of Lucosky Brookman LP *

10.1

Order Approving Stipulation for Settlement of Claim, dated February 4, 2010 (as filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed inCompany’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 5, 2010)

10.2

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated September 1, 2011, by and between Bergio International Inc. and Berge Abajian, individually (as filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 8, 2011)

10.3

Bergio International, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive and Reward Plan (as filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement or any material change to such information inon Form S-8, filed with the Registration Statement.

SEC on May 10, 2011).

(2)

That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating

10.4

Committed Equity Facility Agreement, dated December 23, 2011, by and between Bergio International Inc. and TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (as filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the securities offered therein, andCompany’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.



66




(3)
To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
SEC on February 1, 2012)

(4)

For the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, if the registrant is subject to Rule 430C, each prospectus

10.5

Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 23, 2011, by and between Bergio International Inc. and TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (as filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating t For the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, if the registrant is subject to Rule 430C, each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the regis tration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, asExhibit 10.5 to the purchaserCompany’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with a timethe SEC on February 1, 2012)

23.1

Consent of contractSilberstein Ungar, PLLC *

23.2

Consent of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was madeLucosky Brookman LP (included in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.

o an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to the purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.
Exhibit 5.1 herewith)

(B)


* filed herewith



95



Undertakings


The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:


(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:


i. To include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;


ii. To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement.


iii. To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement;


(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.


(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.


(4) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrantregistrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, described under Item 14 above or otherwise, the Registrantregistrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Registrantregistrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrantregistrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrantregistrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.


(5) Each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.




96



SIGNATURES


67



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this Registration Statementregistration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Fairfield, State of New Jersey, on the 4th day of May 2010.

June 27, 2012.



BERGIO INTERNATIONAL INC.

Date: May 4,  2010

By:

By:

 /s/ Berge Abajian

Name: Berge Abajian

Title: Chief Executive Officer

      (Principal Executive Officer)

Chief Financial Officer

      (Principal Financial Officer)

      (Principal Accounting Officer)



PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT HAS BEEN SIGNED BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE FOLLOWING PERSONS IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES INDICATED:

Name

Position

Date

/s/ Berge Abajian

Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer,

June 27, 2012

Berge Abajian



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statements was signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates stated:

Date: May 4, 2010

By:

/s/Berge Abajian

Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Chairman

 Berge

/s/ Arpi Abajian

Secretary

June 27, 2012

Arpi Abajian

















97




68