(1) Based on number of shares outstanding as of the date of this prospectus.

Summary Financial Information

The Company is a development stage company. The statement of operations data for the period from July 2, 2013 (inception) to December 31, 2013 and the balance sheet data at December 31, 2013 are derived from the Company’s audited financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. On

Jumpstart Our Business Startups (“JOBS”) Act

The disclosure contained below, discusses generally the terms of the “Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act”.

In April, 7, 2014, subsequent2012, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (“JOBS Act”) was enacted into law. The JOBS Act provides, among other things:

Exemptions for emerging growth companies from certain financial disclosure and governance requirements for up to five years and provides a new form of financing to small companies;

Amendments to certain provisions of the federal securities laws to simplify the sale of securities and increase the threshold number of record holders required to trigger the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

Relaxation of the general solicitation and general advertising prohibition for Rule 506 offerings;

Adoption of a new exemption for public offerings of securities in amounts not exceeding $50 million; and

Exemption from registration by a non-reporting company offers and sales of securities of up to $1,000,000 that comply with rules to be adopted by the SEC pursuant to Section 4(6) of the Securities Act and such sales are exempt from state law registration, documentation or offering requirements.

In general, under the JOBS Act a company is an emerging growth company if its initial public offering (“IPO”) of common equity securities was effected after December 8, 2011 and the company had less than $1 billion of total annual gross revenues during its last completed fiscal year. A company will no longer qualify as an emerging growth company after the earliest of

(i) the completion of the fiscal year in which the company has total annual gross revenues of $1 billion or more,

(ii) the completion of the fiscal year of the fifth anniversary of the company’s IPO;

(iii) the company’s issuance of more than $1 billion in nonconvertible debt in the prior three-year period, or

(iv) the company becoming a “larger accelerated filer” as defined under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

The Company meets the definition of an emerging growth company and will be affected by some of the changes provided in the JOBS Act and certain of the new exemptions. The JOBS Act provides additional new guidelines and exemptions for non-reporting companies and for non-public offerings. Those exemptions that impact the Company are discussed below.

Financial Disclosure. The financial disclosure in a registration statement filed by an emerging growth company pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 will differ from registration statements filed by other companies as follows:

(i) audited financial statements required for only two fiscal years;

(ii) selected financial data required for only the fiscal years that were audited;

(iii) executive compensation only needs to be presented in the limited format now required for smaller reporting companies. (A smaller reporting company is one with a public float of less than $75 million as of the last day of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter)

However, the requirements for financial disclosure provided by Regulation S-K promulgated by the Rules and Regulations of the SEC already provide certain of these exemptions for smaller reporting companies. The Company is a smaller reporting company. Currently a smaller reporting company is not required to file as part of its registration statement selected financial data and only needs audited financial statements for its two most current fiscal years and no tabular disclosure of contractual obligations.

The JOBS Act also exempts the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm from complying with any rules newly adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) after the date of the financial statements,JOBS Act’s enactment, except as otherwise required by SEC rule.

The JOBS Act also exempts an emerging growth company from any requirement adopted by the PCAOB for mandatory rotation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer contributed $75,000accounting firm or for a supplemental auditor report about the audit.

Internal Control Attestation. The JOBS Act also provides an exemption from the requirement of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to file a report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, although management of the Company is still required to file its report on the adequacy of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Section 102(a) of the JOBS Act goes on to exempt emerging growth companies from the requirements in 1934 Act Section 14A(e) for companies with a class of securities registered under the 1934 Act to hold shareholder votes for executive compensation and golden parachutes.

Other Items of the JOBS Act. The JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can communicate with potential investors that are qualified institutional buyers or institutions that are accredited to determine interest in a contemplated offering either prior to or after the date of filing the respective registration statement. The Act also permits research reports by a broker or dealer about an emerging growth company regardless if such report provides sufficient information for an investment decision. In addition the JOBS Act precludes the SEC and FINRA from adopting certain restrictive rules or regulations regarding brokers, dealers and potential investors, communications with management and distribution of a research reports on the emerging growth company IPO.

Section 106 of the JOBS Act permits emerging growth companies to submit 1933 Act registration statements on a confidential basis provided that the registration statement and all amendments are publicly filed at least 21 days before the issuer conducts any road show. This is intended to allow the emerging growth company to explore the IPO option without disclosing to the Company as additional paidmarket the fact that it is seeking to go public or disclosing the information contained in capitalits registration statement until the company is ready to conduct a road show.

Election to Opt Out of Transition Period.Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a 1933 Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the 1934 Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standard.

The JOBS Act provides a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. The Company has elected not to opt out of the transition period.

RISK FACTORS

A purchase of any Shares offered by the selling shareholders is an investment in the Company’s common stock and involves a high degree of risk. Investors should consider carefully the following information about these risks, together with the other information contained in this prospectus, before the purchase of any Shares. If any of the following risks actually occur, the business, financial condition or results of operations of the Company would likely suffer. In such a case, the market price of the common stock could decline and investors could lose all or part of the money paid to purchase the Shares.

The Company has no operations and revenues to date.

The Company had sustained since inception an accumulated deficit of $151,551 and $1,900 as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The Company has not commenced operations nor generated any revenues as of the date of this prospectus. To date, most of management’s time, and the Company’s limited resources have been spent in developing a business strategy, researching potential opportunities, contacting partners, exploring marketing contacts, establishing management personnel and resources, preparing its business plan and model, selecting professional advisors and consultants and seeking capital for the Company.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company had sustained a cumulative net loss and accumulated deficit of $1,900, since inception of the Company on July 2, 2013. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet its obligations, which it has not been able to accomplish to date, and /or obtain additional financing from its stockholders and/or other third parties. Subsequent to December 31, 2013, the Company raised approximately $235,000 from its largest shareholder and management believes that after these cash infusions, the Company has adequate working capital to operate through December 31, 2014 based on anticipated cash needs.

There is no assurance that the Company will ever be profitable. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company estimates it will require approximately $250,000 to implement its business plan.

In order to implement its business plan (to include: secure the certifications required for the interlock devices, purchase the manufactured interlock devices from Well Electric, open the initial storefront operation, hire employee(s) and repay the outstanding loan) the Company anticipates that it will require approximately $250,000. The Company does not have a plan currently in place to obtain such funds but anticipates that it will either made an equity or debt offering of its securities or seek loan financing from another source such as a bank or shareholder. If the Company is unable to obtain such financing or raise such funds, its ability to implement the business plan and begin operations is unlikely.

The Company is a development-stage company with no operating history and as such any prospective investor cannot assess the Company’s profitability or performance.

Because the Company is a development-stage company with no operating history, it is impossibledifficult for an investor to assess the performance of the Company or to determine whether the Company will meet its projected business plan. The Company has limited financial results upon which an investor may judge its potential. As a development-stage, the Company may in the future experience under-capitalization, shortages, setbacks and many of the problems, delays and expenses encountered by any early stage business. An investor will be required to make an investment decision based solely on the Company management’s historyCompany’s projected business plan and its projectedlimited operations to date (i.e. contracting for prototype device) in light of the risks, expenses and uncertainties that may be encountered by engaging in the Company’s industry.

Election to use extended transition period available under the JOBS Act makes financial comparisons more difficult.

The Company has elected not to opt out of the extended transition period available under the JOBS Act for emerging growth companies. Such election means that the financial reporting requirements that are now applicable to public companies are not applicable to those emerging growth companies which choose to utilize the longer transition period. In effect, as a result of the Company’s election not to opt out of the available extended transition period, its financial statements may not be comparable to companies that do comply with the new public company reporting standards. Comparable financial information will not be available for comparable time periods between such companies and any potential investor will be at a disadvantage in making an investment decision without such information easily available.

Resales of restricted shares by investors is limited and may be prohibited for one year.

Rule 144 is not available for the resale of securities issued by a former shell company. Typically the guidelines contained in Rule 144 are relied upon by investors as a safe harbor from being deemed underwriters for the resale of restricted securities. These requirements, depending on one’s status whether an affiliate of the issuer, generally require a specific holding period and/or the availability of public information. However Rule 144 is available to a former shell company (and its investors) only (i) one year after the company has filed current “Form 10” information (i.e. information similar to that required in a registration statement on Form S-1) and (ii) is current for one year on public filing information required by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The definition of a shell company is one with nominal assets and/or assets consisting of cash only. The Company is considered a shell company and as such investors may not be able to transfer their shares until such time as it meets the requirements of Rule 144 or files a registration statement for the removal of restrictions on such shares.

The Company has no patent or intellectual property protection on its ignition interlock device.

Well Electric, a Chinese company, is developing the technology and manufacturing the prototype ignition interlock device for the Company. The Company does not own the rights to the technology in the creation of such prototypes and as such does not intend to apply for a patent or other intellectual property protection. In fact Well Electric has created an ignition interlock device for another company which markets such device in Australia and the United States. This lack of trademark or intellectual property protection may create additional competition in the market of these devices and make it that much harder for the Company to gain a market share. However, the Company believes that the market is growing as the mandated use of such devices gains acceptance as a mandated procedure.

The Company is a development stage company and has a correspondingly smallwith only one officer which serves as the financial and accounting organization.department for the Company. Being a public company may strain the Company’s resources, divert management’s attention and affect its ability to attract and retain qualified officers and directors.

The Company is a development stage company with only one officer and has no developedexperienced finance andnor accounting organization and the rigorous demands of being a public company require a structured and developed finance and accounting group.on staff. As a reporting company, the Company is already subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. However, theThe requirements of these laws and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder entail significant accounting, legal and financial compliance costs which may be prohibitive to the Company as it develops its business plan, services and scope. These costs have made, and will continue to make, some activities more difficult, time consuming or costly and may place significanta strain on its personnel, systems andthe Company’s resources.

The Securities Exchange Act requires, among other things, that companies maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In order to maintain the requisite disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, significant resources and management oversight are required. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on the development of the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

These rules and regulations may also make it difficult and expensive for the Company to obtain director and officer liability insurance. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate director and officer insurance, its ability to recruit and retain qualified officers and directors, especially those directors who may be deemed independent, will be significantly curtailed.

The Company does not currently possess effective disclosure controls and procedures that are adequate for a public company.

Based upon their respectiveits evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company have(which are the same person, i.e. Mr. Wainer) concluded that, as of March 31, 2014, the existing disclosure controls and procedures of the Company were not effective. Disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. With only one officer in charge of such reporting controls, there is no backup to the oversight of such individual and thus such disclosure controls and procedures may not be considered effective.

The Company has engaged outside accounting and finance advisors to assist the Company in better implementing effective disclosure controls and procedures.

The Company is a development-stage company and has little experience as a public company.

The Company is a development-stage company and as such has little experience in managing a public company. Such lack of experience may result in the Company experiencing difficulty in adequately operating and growing its business. Further, the Company may be hampered by lack of experience in addressing the issues and considerations which are common to growing companies. If the Company’s operating or management abilities consistently perform below expectations, the Company’s business is unlikely to thrive. In addition, although the Company is already a reporting company, the Company’s lack of experience may result, in spite of the successful development of its products, in difficulty in managing the operations and finances of a public company.

The Company expects to incur additional expenses and may ultimately never be profitable.

The Company is a development-stage company and has limited operations to date. The Company will need to begin generating revenue to achieve and maintain profitability. To become profitable, the Company must successfully developmarket and distributesell (lease) ignition interlock devices and services. These processesThe Company does not yet have a product ready to market. The success marketing and sale (leasing) of the device will involve many factors that are beyond the Company’s control, including the type of competition that the Company may encounter. Ultimately, in spite of the Company’s best or reasonable efforts, the Company may never actually generate revenues or become profitable.

If the Company is unable to generate sufficient cash, it may find it necessary to curtail operational activities.

The Company has an extensive business plan hinged on its ability to develop, market and commercialize its ignition interlock system. If the Company is unable to develop, market and commercialize the ignition interlock system., then it would not be able to proceed with its business plan or possibly to successfully develop at all its planned operations.

The Company may face significant competition from companies that serve its industries.

The Company may face competition from other companies that offer similar solutions. Some of these potential competitors may have longer operating histories, greater brand recognition, larger client bases and significantly greater financial, product development and marketing resources than the Company possesses. These advantages may enable such competitors to respond more quickly to new or emerging trends and changes in customer preferences. These advantages may also allow them to engage in more extensive market research and development, undertake extensive far-reaching marketing campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies and make more attractive offers to potential customers, employees and strategic partners. The Company believes that its current and anticipated solutions are, and will be, sufficiently different from existing competition, and that thereIt is limited to no competition in its local area. However, it is nevertheless possible that potential competitors may have or may rapidly acquire significant market share. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross margin and loss of market share. The Company may not be able to compete successfully, and competitive pressures may adversely affect its business, results of operations and financial condition.

The Company is subject to regulatory oversight and, if it does not continue toinitially receive the necessary regulatory approvals, its revenues may decline.such approval it will not begin operations.

The Company is subject to regulation by the United States Department of Transportation and by various state departments of transportation. The Company’s ignition interlock devices that the Company intends to market need to be certified by the state in which it intends to market and sell the devices. Before applying for certification to any state, the devices are subjectsent to an independent laboratory for testing and certification that the device meets or exceeds the guidelines published by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration as the Model Specifications for Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devices. The Model SpecificationsEach state has its own set of certification guidelines that must be met but typically the requirements for state certification are guidelines formet once the performance and testing of ignition interlock devices. Instruments are tested and, if passed, included ondevice is certified by an independent laboratory as meeting or exceeding the Conforming Products ListNHTSA published periodically in the Federal Register.

guidelines. The Company believes that its productthe devices will be in substantial compliance with the regulations. However, compliance standards may change due to factors beyond the control

The Company has not received any approvals for its ignition interlock device. Upon receipt of its prototype devices, the Company and the Company may be requiredwill submit them to obtain regulatory approvals or licenses from other federal, state or local agencies or comparable agencies in other countries.an independent testing laboratory to achieve certification. If the Company loses government approval or is unable to obtain necessary approvals it will not be able to begin its revenues may decline and its business may be adversely affected.marketing or leasing/sales plans.

The Company’s business in court-mandated interlock installment is susceptible to changes in state policies and DUI laws.

Ignition interlock devices are not used to the same degree in each state. Use of the device is determined by a combination of federal highway safety laws, state DUI laws, historical practice, and individual state directions for alcohol testing. Some states may be unwilling to accept the Company’s ignition interlock device or prefer different technologies. Such factors are beyond the control of the Company and changes to such laws, policies and practices may adversely affect the Company’s potential sales and revenues.

Reliance on third party agreements and relationships is necessary for development of the Company’s business.

The Company will need strong third party relationships and partnerships in order to develop and grow its business. The Company will be substantially dependent on these strategic partners and third party relationships. For instance, the Company has currently contracted with Well Electric for the development and production of its initial prototype ignition interlock devices. The Company is relying on such third party to produce the prototype which meets or exceeds the minimum test standards model specifications and to thereafter produce such devices as ordered by the Company. The Company is not equipped to develop or manufacture these devices itself.

No formal market survey has been conducted.

No independent marketing survey has been performed to determine the potential demand for the Company’s ignition interlock device. Nor has the Company conducted marketing studies regarding whether such products or services would actually be marketable. No assurances can be given that upon marketing, the Company will be able to develop a sufficient customer base and business segment to sustain the Company’s operations on a continued basis.

The proposed operations of the Company are speculative.

The success of the proposed business plan of the Company will depend to a great extent on the operations, financial condition and management of the Company. Although the Company has a business plan and intends to execute its overall business strategy, limited operations have been conducted to date. As no revenues have been finalized or consummated as of yet, the proposed operations of the Company remain speculative.

The Company’s sole officer and director owns and will continue to own a majority of the Company’s common stock and, as a result, can exercise control over stockholder and corporate actions.

Laurence Wainer, the sole officer and director of the Company, is currently the beneficial owner of a majority of the Company’s outstanding common stock. Assuming sale of all the Shares offered by him, he will still own a majority of the Company’s then outstanding common stock upon closing of the offering. As such, he will be able to control most matters requiring approval by stockholders, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on the market price of the Company’s common stock or prevent stockholders from realizing a premium over the market price for their Shares.

The Company depends on its management to manage its business effectively.

The Company’s future success is dependent in large part upon its ability to understand and develop the business plan and to attract and retain highly skilled management, operational and executive personnel. In particular, due to the relatively early stage of the Company’s business, its future success is highly dependent on Mr. Wainer to provide the necessary experience and background to execute the Company’s business plan. The loss of his services could impede, particularly initially as the Company builds a record and reputation, its ability to develop its objectives, and its ability to develop and market ignition interlock devices.

There has beenis no prior public market for the Company’s securities and the lack of such a market may make resale of the stock difficult.

No prior public market has existed for the Company’s securities and the Company cannot assure any investor that a market will develop subsequent to this offering. An investor must be fully aware of the long-term nature of an investment in the Company. The Company intends to apply for quotation of its common stock on the OTC Bulletin Board as soon as possible which may be while this offering is still in process. However,In order to apply for such quotation, the Company will need to locate a market maker who will submit such application for the Company. The Company has no agreement or understanding with any market maker and has not yet taken any steps to locate such market maker. In addition, the Company does not know if it will be successful in such application, how long such application will take, or, that if successful, that a market for the common stock will ever develop or continue on the OTC Bulletin Board. If for any reason the common stock is not listedquoted on the OTC Bulletin Board or a public trading market does not otherwise develop, investors in the offering may have difficulty selling their common stock should they desire to do so. If the Company is not successful in its application for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board, it will apply to have its securities quoted bytraded in the Pink OTC Markets, Inc., real-time quotation service for over-the-counter equities. In addition, investors may be unable to rely on the guidelines of Rule 144 for the sale of restricted securities until such time as the Company meets the requirements imposed by that Rule for sale of restricted securities by shell companies.

The Company does not intend to pay dividends to its stockholders, so investors will not receive any return on investment in the Company prior to selling their interest in it.

The Company does not project paying dividends but anticipates that it will retain future earnings for funding the Company’s growth and development. Therefore, investors should not expect the Company to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. As a result, investors will not receive any return on their investment prior to selling their Shares in the Company, if and when a market for such Shares develops. Furthermore, even if a market for the Company’s securities does develop, there is no guarantee that the market price for the shares would be equal to or more than the initial per share investment price paid by any investor. There is a possibility that the Shares could lose all or a significant portion of their value from the initial price paid in this offering.

The Company’s stock may be considered a penny stock and any investment in the Company’s stock will be considered a high-risk investment and subject to restrictions on marketability.

If the Shares commence trading, the trading price of the Company’s common stock may be below $5.00 per share. If the price of the common stock is below such level, trading in its common stock would be subject to the requirements of certain rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These rules require additional disclosure by broker-dealers in connection with any trades generally involving any non-NASDAQ equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Such rules require the delivery, before any penny stock transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith, and impose various sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally institutions). For these types of transactions, the broker-dealer must determine the suitability of the penny stock for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written consent to the transactions before sale. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by such requirements may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in the Company’s common stock which could impact the liquidity of the Company’s common stock.

The Company has authorized the issuance of preferred stock with certain preferences.

The board of directors of the Company is authorized to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value preferred stock. The board of directors has the power to establish the dividend rates, liquidation preferences, and voting rights of any series of preferred stock, and these rights may be superior to the rights of holders of the Shares. The board of directors may also establish redemption and conversion terms and privileges with respect to any shares of preferred stock. Any such preferences may operate to the detriment of the rights of the holders of the Shares, and further, could be used by the board of directors as a device to prevent a change in control of the Company. No such preferred shares or preferences have been issued to date, but such shares or preferences may be issued at a later time, subject to the sole discretion of the board of directors.

The offering price of the Shares has been arbitrarily determined by the Company and such offering should not be used by an investor as an indicator of the fair market value of the Shares.

Currently there is no public market for the Company’s common stock. The offering price for the Shares has been arbitrarily determined by the Company and does not necessarily bear any direct relationship to the assets, operations, book or other established criteria of value of the Company. Thus an investor should be aware that the offering price does not reflect the fair market price of the Shares.

The Company may complete a primary public offering (or private placement) for Shares in parallel with or immediately following this offering.

The Company may conduct a primary public offering (or private placement) for Shares to raise capital for the Company. Such an offering may be conducted in parallel with or immediately following this offering. Sales of additional Shares will dilute the percentage ownership of shareholders in the Company.

Forward-Looking Statements

This prospectus contains, in addition to historical information, certain information, assumptions and discussions that may constitute forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially than those projected or anticipated. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes its assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, the Company cannot assure an investor that the forward-looking statements set out in this prospectus will prove to be accurate. The Company’s businesses can be affected by, without limitation, such things as natural disasters, economic trends, international strife or upheavals, consumer demand patterns, labor relations, existing and new competition, consolidation, and growth patterns within the industries in which the Company competes and any deterioration in the economy may individually or in combination impact future results.

DETERMINATION OF OFFERING PRICE

There is no public market for the Company’s common stock and the price at which the Shares are being offered has been arbitrarily determined by the Company. This price does not necessarily bear any direct relationship to the assets, operations, book or other established criteria of value of the Company but represents solely the arbitrary opinion of management of the Company.

DIVIDEND POLICY

The Company does not anticipate that it will declare dividends in the foreseeable future but rather intends to use any future earnings for the development of its business.

SELLING SHAREHOLDER SALES

This prospectus relates to the sale of 5,641,000 outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock by the holders of those shares. The selling shareholders, who are deemed to be statutory underwriters, will offer their shares at a price of $1.00 per share, until the Company’s common stock is listed on a national securities exchange or is quoted onclose of the OTC Bulletin Board (or a successor); after which, the selling shareholders may sell their shares at prevailing market or privately negotiated prices, including (without limitation) in one or more transactions that may take place by ordinary broker’s transactions, privately-negotiated transactions or through sales to one or more dealers for resale.Offering.

Usual and customary or specifically negotiated brokerage fees or commissions may be paid by the selling shareholders in connection with sales of the common stock. The selling shareholders may from time to time offer their shares through underwriters, brokers-dealers, agents or other intermediaries. The distribution of the common stock by the selling shareholders may be effected in one or more transactions that may take place through customary brokerage channels, in privately negotiated sales; by a combination of these methods; or by other means. The Company will not receive any portion or percentage of any of the proceeds from the sale of the Selling Shareholders’ Shares.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

The Company and the selling shareholders are seeking an underwriter, broker-dealer or selling agent to sell the Shares. Neither the Company nor the selling shareholders have entered into any arrangements with any underwriter, broker-dealer or selling agent as of the date of this prospectus. At the time of this prospectus, neither the Company nor the selling shareholders has located a broker-dealer or selling agent to sell the Shares.

The Company intends to maintain the currency and accuracy of this prospectus and to permit offers and sales of the Shares for a period of up to two (2) years, unless earlier completely sold, pursuant to Rule 415 of the General Rules and Regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 3a4-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, none of the officers or directors offering the Shares is considered to be a broker of such securities as (i) no officer or director is subject to any statutory disqualification, (ii) no officer or director is nor will be compensated by commissions for sales of the securities, (iii) no officer or director is associated with a broker or dealer, (iv) all officers and directors are primarily employed on behalf of the Company in substantial duties and (v) no officer or director participates in offering and selling securities more than once every 12 months.

The offering will terminate 24 months following the date of the initial effectiveness of the registration statement to which this prospectus relates, unless earlier closed.

Resales of the Securities under State Securities Laws

The National Securities Market Improvement Act of 1996 (“NSMIA”) limits the authority of states to impose restrictions upon resales of securities made pursuant to Sections 4(1) and 4(3) of the Securities Act of companies which file reports under Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act. Resales of the Shares in the secondary market will be made pursuant to Section 4(1) of the Securities Act (sales other than by an issuer, underwriter or broker). The resale of such Shares may be subject to the holding period and other requirements of Rule 144 of the General Rules and Regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Selling Shareholders

The selling shareholders will offer their shares at a price of $1.00 per share, until the Company’s common stock is listed on a national securities exchange or is quoted onclose of the OTC Bulletin Board (or a successor); after which, the selling shareholders may sell their shares at prevailing market or privately negotiated prices, including (without limitation) in one or more transactions that may take place by ordinary broker’s transactions, privately-negotiated transactions or through sales to one or more dealers for resale.Offering. The distribution of the Selling Shareholder Shares may be effected in one or more transactions that may take place through customary brokerage channels, in privately-negotiated sales, by a combination of these methods or by other means. The selling shareholders may from time to time offer their shares through underwriters, brokers-dealers, agents or other intermediaries. Usual and customary or specifically negotiated brokerage fees or commissions may be paid by the selling shareholders in connection with sales of the Shares. The Company will not receive any portion or percentage of any of the proceeds from the sale of the Shares. Of the 5,641,000 Shares offered in the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, 776,000 Shares are held by Laurence Wainer, the sole officer and director of the Company.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

Capitalization

The Company is authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001, of which 14,565,000 Shares are outstanding as of the date of the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part. The Company is also authorized to issue 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001, of which no shares were outstanding as of the date of the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part.

The following statements relating to the capital stock set forth the material terms of the securities of the Company, however, reference is made to the more detailed provisions of, and such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to, the certificate of incorporation and the by-laws, copies of which are filed as exhibits to this registration statement.

Common Stock

The CompanyThis registration statement is registering up to 5,641,000 Shares of common stock for sale to the public by the holders thereof at a price of $1.00 per Share. The Company is not directly offering any Shares for sale.

Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters to be voted on by the stockholders. Holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights.

Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding shares of preferred stock, the holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the board of directors in its discretion from funds legally available therefor.

Holders of common stock have no preemptive rights to purchase the Company’s common stock. There are no conversion or redemption rights or sinking fund provisions with respect to the common stock. The Company may issue additional shares of common stock which could dilute its current shareholder’s share value.

Preferred Stock

Shares of preferred stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series as may be determined by the board of directors. The board of directors may fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof without any further vote or action by the stockholders of the Company, except that no holder of preferred stock shall have preemptive rights. Any shares of preferred stock so issued would typically have priority over the common stock with respect to dividend or liquidation rights. Any future issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of the Company without further action by the stockholders and may adversely affect the voting and other rights of the holders of common stock.

At present, the Company has no plans to issue any preferred stock or adopt any series, preferences or other classification of preferred stock. The issuance of shares of preferred stock, or the issuance of rights to purchase such shares, could be used to discourage an unsolicited acquisition proposal. For instance, the issuance of a series of preferred stock might impede a business combination by including class voting rights that would enable the holder to block such a transaction, or facilitate a business combination by including voting rights that would provide a required percentage vote of the stockholders. In addition, under certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of the common stock.

Although the Company’s board of directors is required to make any determination to issue such preferred stock based on its judgment as to the best interests of the stockholders of the Company, the board of directors could act in a manner that would discourage an acquisition attempt or other transaction that some, or a majority, of the stockholders might believe to be in their best interests or in which stockholders might receive a premium for their stock over the then market price of such stock. The board of directors does not at present intend to seek stockholder approval prior to any issuance of currently authorized stock, unless otherwise required by law or otherwise.

Admission to Quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board

If the Company meets the qualifications, it intends to apply for quotation of its securities on the OTC Bulletin Board. The OTC Bulletin Board differs from national and regional stock exchanges in that it (1) is not situated in a single location but operates through communication of bids, offers and confirmations between broker-dealers and (2) securities admitted to quotation are offered by one or more broker-dealers rather than the “specialist” common to stock exchanges. To qualify for quotation on the OTC Bulletin Board, an equity security must have one registered broker-dealer, known as the market maker, willing to list bid or sale quotations and to sponsor the company listing. In addition, the Company must make available adequate current public information as required by applicable rules and regulations.

In certain cases the Company may elect to have its securities initially quoted in the Pink Sheets published by Pink OTC Markets Inc. In general there is greater liquidity for traded securities on the OTC Bulletin Board, and less through quotation on the Pink Sheets. It is not possible to predict where, if at all, the securities of the Company will be traded following the effectiveness of this registration statement.

Transfer Agent

It is anticipated that GlobexThe Company has engaged VStock Transfer, LLC, of Deltona, Florida willWoodmere, New York, to act as transfer agent for the common stock of the Company.

Penny Stock Regulation

Penny stocks generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 per share other than securities registered on national securities exchanges or listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities are provided by the exchange or system. The penny stock rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally those with assets in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 together with their spouse). For transactions covered by these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of such securities and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the purchase. Additionally, for any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require the delivery, prior to the transaction, of a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information on the limited market in penny stocks. Because of these penny stock rules, broker-dealers may be restricted in their ability to sell the Company’s common stock. The foregoing required penny stock restrictions will not apply to the Company’s common stock if such stock reaches and maintains a market price of $5.00 per share or greater.

Dividends

The Company has not paid any dividends to date. The Company intends to employ all available funds for the growth and development of its business, and accordingly, does not intend to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Dilution

Dilution in the value of the Shares held by current shareholders if additional shares of common stock are issued at a price less than that paid by the current shareholders. Such dilution may occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock for value less than that paid by the current shareholders. There is no restriction on the ability of the Company to issue additional shares of its common stock at a price to be determined at the time of such sale or sales.

THE BUSINESS

Background

The Company is a development stage company and has limited operating history and is expected to experience losses in the near term.

Summary

The Company has developedcontracted with Well Electric, a Chinese company, to develop and produce an Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device whichfor marketing and leasing by the Company. The device is a mechanism that is installed on the steering column of an automobile into which a driver exhales and which then provides a blood-alcohol concentration analysis. If the driver’s blood-alcohol content is higher than a certain pre-programmed limit, the device prevents the ignition from engaging and the automobile from starting. These devices are often required for use by DUI or DWI (“driving under the influence” or “driving while intoxicated”) offenders as part of their mandatory court or motor vehicle department program.

The Company’s device is state-of-the-artwill be equipped with wireless capabilities, GPS, video and infrared technologies.

Well Electric is contracted to furnish six initial prototype devices to the Company. Delivery is expected in Fall, 2014. Once the Company has received the prototype devices, it will submit them to an independent testing laboratory for testing and certification that the device meets or exceeds the Model Specifications of Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devices guidelines published by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. After certification by the independent testing laboratory that the devices meet such published guidelines, the Company will apply for state certification. The devices need to be certified by the state in which the Company intends to market and sell the devices. Each state has its own set of certification guidelines that must be met but typically the requirements for state certification are met once the device is certified by an independent laboratory as meeting or exceeding the NHTSA published guidelines. The Company has subcontractedbelieves that the devices will be in substantial compliance with Well Electric,the regulations.

The Company expects the certification process to take an aggregate of approximately 8 to 9 months. After it receives certification, the Company intends to open a manufacturing company locatedstorefront in China,Los Angeles County at which it will lease, install, calibrate, remove and monitor the devices.

The individual subject to manufacturethe court order pays for the installation of the ignition interlock device. The Company will provide the on-going monitoring of the device by downloading data from the device at predetermined intervals according to state guidelines. The data will be collected and delivermade available to the devices.appropriate authorities for review. The data will show all alcohol tests and the pass/failure of each as well as missed tests and attempts to bypass or circumvent the system. The data will also reflect that time the car is being driven.

The Company intends to lease the interlock devices to individuals requiring an interlock device pursuant to a mandatory court or motor vehicle department program arising from a DUI or DWI conviction. Alcohol ignition interlock devices are breath alcohol analyzers installed directly intoThe individual requiring the user’s vehicle. The device requires the user to provide a breath sample prior to starting the vehicle’s engine. If the user’s blood alcohol level exceeds a predetermined level, the interlock device will preventlease the userdevice from starting the vehicle.Company at an anticipated price of between $100-$225 for installation, $75 per month lease and $100 for removal.

The Company anticipates that it could be atwill lease the cutting edgedevices only and ownership of the industry in two major ways:devices remains with the Company after the individual’s mandated period required for using the device has finished, the device will be returned to the Company. The Company does not intend to lease the devices to anyone outside a government or regulatory mandated program. That is, the Company will not lease its devices to private companies or individuals wishing to use such technology.

First by utilizing customer service as the cornerstone of its business. The Company believes that by providing well-trained, accessible, and professional employees and franchisees, it will be recognized as a company highly recommended to the jurisdictional body for such court (or motor vehicle department) ordered process.

Second by incorporating a high level of technology. The Company has designed a state-of-the-art ignition interlock device equipped with wireless capabilities, GPS, video and infrared technologies which the Company believes will provide the easiest to operate and most reliable ignition interlock device in the industry.

The Ignition Interlock Device

The ignition interlock devices aredevice is breath-alcohol testing devices. Generally, these devices aredevice approximately the size of a smartphone and arewhich is installed directly onto a vehicle’s steering column. The ignition interlock device requires the driver to exhale into the device prior to starting the vehicle. The device will prevent the vehicle from starting if the driver’s blood-alcohol content exceeds a predetermined set level.

The Company believes its device as designed by Well Electric will attempt to be a leading state ofincorporate the artlatest technology and design in the market for such devices. The device and hasis designed to have both GPS and video capabilities. The device has a fuel cell sensor and a color screen display screen. The external camera mounting can wrap around the automobile’s review mirror. The device is powered by either an internal battery or a power cable from a control box which supports botherboth 24V and 12V. The device has both USB communication capabilities and WiFi (with approval from service provider).

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION:

The specifications for the Company’s ignition interlock device is equipped with GPS, VIDEO, infrared technologiesare as well as Wireless capabilities and are manufactured under the specifications below:

Interlock Specifications:follows:

Patents

The Company has not applied and does not intend to apply for a patent on the device or any of the technology contained therein. It is possible that other companies may develop similar or the same technology device and bring it to market. In addition Well Electric is developing and manufacturing the device under the Company’s specific Original Equipment Manufacturing (“OEM”) specifications (i.e. it will have a unique model number and “look”) but Well Electric has no other contractual obligation to the Company to restrict it in developing similar devices for other competitors which may compete with the Company.

Manufacture and Distribution

The Company has paid $30,000 to Well Electric, a manufacturing company located in Chenzan, China, to manufacture and deliver an initial production of six ignition interlock devices.

There is no patent on the The Company anticipates delivery of its initial prototype in August or early Fall, 2014. The Company’s ignition interlock device but it is manufactured under the Company’s own OEM. The device isspecifications, model number and outward design look.

After the Company has received certification from the California State Department of Motor Vehicles for its ignition interlock devices, the Company intends to open a statestorefront location in Los Angeles County and hire personnel to install, calibrate, remove and monitor the devices. Once it receives certification, the Company’s name will appear on the list provided to offenders by the court or other regulatory agency as a certified provider of the art wireless ignitiondevice. The Company will lease the device which with GPSto the offender for the mandated required period at an annual price of $1200 (including $75 monthly lease, installation and video capability.

The Marketremoval charges). After the mandated period has expired, the device will be returned to the Company.

The Market

According to NCSL or National Conference of State Legislature’s currently all 50 states and the District of Columbia have an ignition interlock law providing for the use of an interlock device in connection with sentencing. Twenty-one of those states require that all first time offenders install an ignition interlock device; the other 29 states do not require the installation of such device for first time offenders but may so require for second or multi offenders.Many courts mandate the installation of ignition interlock devices after a DUI or DWI conviction. California first introduced an ignition interlock pilot program in the mid-1980’s as part of the legislature’s effort to combat drunk driving. Subsequently, the market for such devices has spread rapidly. Currently, all 50 states and the District of Columbia maintain some form of

Blow & Drive Interlock has not received any state regulatory approvals to date to install its ignition interlock legislation, with 21states requiring alldevice. Once the Company receives delivery of the initial six prototype units expected in early fall, 2014 it will send two of the devices to an independent certified testing laboratory to obtain certification that the devices meet or exceed the guidelines in the Model Specifications of Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devices published by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The Company expects the testing certification process to take approximately five months.

After successful certification from the independent laboratory, the Company will apply for state certification. It anticipates that it will begin its first time DUI offenders to install ancertification in California. States usually approve any ignition interlock device that meets or exceeds the guidelines in their primary automobile. Internationally, Canadathe Model Specifications of Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devices. The state certification process typically takes approximately 90 days. After receiving state certification, the Company plans to open its initial storefront location in Los Angeles County, California and Australia havehire qualified auto technicians to install, calibrate, remove and monitor the devices. After such certification, the Company will also adopted similar laws.appear on the list of approved ignition interlock installers provided to the DUI/DWI offenders by the Court, Department of Motor Vehicles or other program.

According to a study conducted by Philip Roth, PhD. and published by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, there were approximately 280,000 ignition interlock devices installed in vehicles across the U.S. in 2012. However, each year there are approximately 1,400,000 impaired driving arrests and 1,000,000 convictions. The Company anticipates that the number of installedrequired devices is expected to grow exponentially as organizations such as the Automobile Association of America (AAA), Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), and The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NTSHA) are pushingpush for federal adoption of a mandatory Ignition Interlock Devices for all DUI/DWI offenders. However, there is no assurance that any such law may be proposed or adopted into law.

Governmental Regulations

According to data compiled by Bloomberg, theThe ignition interlock devices that the Company intends to market need to be certified by the state in which it intends to market and sell the devices. Before applying for certification to any state, the devices are sent to an independent laboratory for testing and certification that the device market could surge nearly fivefold if a Federal interlock billmeets or exceeds the guidelines published by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration as the Model Specifications for Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devices. Each state has its own set of certification guidelines that must be met. Typically the requirements for state certification are met once the device is passed. An increase of that magnitude incertified by an independent laboratory as meeting or exceeding the market could mean a significant jump in overall industry sales.

Governmental RegulationsNHTSA published guidelines.

The Company requireshas not submitted its device for testing by an independent testing laboratory and has not received any approvals for its ignition interlock device. The Company believes that the devices will be in substantial compliance with the regulations.

Once received from Well Electric, the Company intends to send its prototypes to an independent laboratory for testing and certification. There is no assurance that it will pass such testing. If the Company’s prototype devices pass and are approved, the Company intends to submit the results to the department of motor vehicles initially in the State of California along with an application to be listed as an approved provider of ignition interlock devices.

In addition to approval from the National Highway Safety Transportation Association (“NHSTA”) in order to commercializeof its ignition interlock device, the Company will apply to the State of California Bureau of Automotive Repair (BAR) to become a licensed provider of automobile repair. The process for court-mandated purposes. Currently,such approval requires submitting an application to the Department of Consumer Affairs and payment of a $200 application fee. A representative from that department will visit the Company’s device meetsfacility simply to ensure that there is the necessary space for the auto repair work intended to be performed. It does not certify or exceeds NHSTA guidelines. However, it is possible that any expansionotherwise approve workmanship. The only auto repair work to be performed by the Company will be to install and remove the devices. Such work does not involve more than attaching the device to the Company’s businesssteering column. The Company has not yet started the process and operationsanticipates that it will do so in the future would require government approvals.early 2015. The Company has been informed that this licensing process takes approximately 90 days.

Competition

The Company hopes to compete for business with both foreign and domestic manufacturers.providers. Many of the Company’s competitors are larger and may have substantially greater resources than the Company. Currently, there are approximately fifteen other manufacturesproviders of ignition interlock devices. The leading manufacturersproviders have international sales and include Lifesafer, Guardian Interlock, Smart Start, and Draeger.

The Company hopes to build its market share and to differentiate itself from the competition with a state-of-the-art product and excellent customer service.

Strategic Partners and Suppliers

The Company believes that strategic partnerships will be a major component of the Company’s operating strategy and path to success. The Company hopes to work with several strategic partners in important areas of its business and operations. However, currently, the Company has no such strategic partners.

The Company intends to enter future agreements with other manufacturers for the production ofdoes not design nor manufacture the ignition interlock device that it intends to market and sell. The Company is using third party companies to design and manufacture such device. As such, the Company is relying on its contractual relationship with Well Electric to develop the ignition interlock prototype device to the standards required to meet federal and state regulations. The Company will be using Well Electric as its manufacturer for additional devices.

Marketing Strategy

The Company has not yet conducted limitedany advertising andnor marketing to date as the primary focus of the Company since inception has been to concentrate on beginningdeveloping its constructionbusiness plan and development efforts.obtaining its prototype interlock devises. The Company has however, given substantial attention to constructing the development of its marketing strategy and plansplan that it will use once its project entersthe prototype is ready to enter the marketplace.

PLAN OF OPERATION

Business Plan

The Company has designed and developed a state-of-the-art ignition interlock device equipped with GPS, VIDEO, infrared technologies as well as wireless capabilities. The Company has entered contract withpaid Well Electric, a Chinese manufacturing company towith experience in design and manufacture and deliver theof ignition interlock devices. The Company intendsdevices, $30,000 to lease its device to individuals convicted of Driving Underdesign and manufacture the Influence of Alcohol or Driving While Intoxicated as part of a mandatory court or motor vehicle department program. Typically the convicted offender pays to install theprototype ignition interlock device for the Company. Well Electric has designed and manufactured such a device for another company which markets and sells the interlock devices in Australia and the United States. The design specifications provide for these prototypes to be equipped with wireless capabilities, GPS, video and infrared technologies. Well Electric will produce six prototype devices for the Company. Additional units can be purchased at a cost of approximately $1200$500 each.

The Company expects the delivery of the initial six prototype units in early fall, 2014. After receipt of the prototype devices, the Company will send two of the devices to an independent certified testing laboratory to verify that they meet or exceed the guidelines for such interlock systems as published by the National Highway Transportation Safety Agency. The Company expects the testing certification process to take approximately five months.

After successful certification, the Company will apply for state certification. States usually approve any ignition interlock device that has received certification from an independent testing laboratory that the device meets or exceeds the published guidelines in the Model Specifications for Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devices. State certification process typically takes approximately 90 days.

Each state’s department of motor vehicles maintains a list of their state’s approved ignition interlock providers. The list for each state is available through the website of that state’s department of motor vehicles. The Company believes that placement on the approved list of providers occurs once the provider’s ignition interlock device that has received lab certification and the Company completes the state’s provider application and submits the lab test results.

After receiving such certification, the Company will appear on the list of approved ignition interlock installers provided to the DUI/DWI offenders by the Court, the Department of Motor Vehicles or other program. After receiving the certification, the Company then intends open a storefront location and to personnel to install, calibrate, remove and monitor the devices.

The Company will lease ignition interlock devices only to those persons requiring the installation of such devices by a court, the Department of Motor Vehnicles or other regulatory agency mandated program. The Company will not sell or lease the devices to the general public. The retail price to lease an ignition interlock device from the Company is estimated at between $100-$225 for installation, $75 per year.month and $100 for removal.

The individual subject to the court order pays for the installation of the ignition interlock device. The Company will provide the on-going monitoring of the device by downloading data from the device at predetermined intervals according to state guidelines. The data will be collected and made available to the appropriate authorities for review. The data will show all alcohol tests and the pass/failure of each as well as missed tests and attempts to bypass or circumvent the system. The datedata will also reflect that time the car is being drive.

Mandatory requirements for useThe Company anticipates a timeline as marked beside each item and known cost assessments to be paid as outlined in the table below.