As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2013June 16, 2022

Registration No. 333-189422333-

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Amendment No. 1 toFORM S-1

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

MusclePharm Corporation

(Exact name of registrantRegistrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada283477-0664193

(State or other jurisdiction

of
incorporation or organization)

(Primary Standard Industrial


Classification Code Number)

(I.R.S. Employer


Identification Number)

4721 Ironton Street, Building A6728 W. Sunset Rd., Suite 130

Denver, Colorado 80239Las Vegas, NV89119

Telephone: (303) 396-6100

(800)859-3010
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’sRegistrant’s principal executive offices)

Brad J. PyattRyan Drexler

Co-Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

MusclePharm Corporation6728 W. Sunset Rd., Suite 130

5348 Vegas Drive

Las Vegas Nevada 89108, NV89119

Telephone: (702) 953-1890(800)859-3010

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

Copies to:

Harvey J. Kesner,

Richard A. Friedman, Esq.

Stephen A. Cohen, Esq.

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112
Telephone: (212) 653-8700

M. Ali Panjwani, Esq.

Pryor Cashman LLP

7 Times Square. 40th Floor

New York, NY 10036

Telephone: (212) 326-0820

Arthur S. Marcus, Esq.
Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP
61 Broadway, 32nd Floor
New York, New York 10006
Telephone: (212) 930-9700
Fax: (212) 930-9725

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:

As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement is declared effective.registration statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box: ¨

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer¨Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting companyx
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☐

The Registrantregistrant hereby amends this Registration Statementregistration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrantregistrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statementregistration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statementregistration statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

Title of Each Class of
Securities to be Registered
 Amount to be
Registered(1)
  Proposed
Maximum
Offering Price
per Share(2)
  Proposed Maximum
Aggregate Offering Price
  Amount of
Registration Fee
 
                 
Shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share  1,740,691(2) $10.76  $18,729,835.16  $2,554.77 

(1)Pursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the shares being registered hereunder include such indeterminate number of shares of common stock, as may be issuable with respect to the shares being registered hereunder as a result of stock splits, stock dividends or similar transactions.

(2)Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, using the average of the high and low prices as reported on the OTCBB on June 11, 2013, which was $10.76 per share.

 
 

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is declared effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell nor does it seek an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUSSUBJECT TO COMPLETIONDATED JULY 15, 2013JUNE 16, 2022

1,740,691

MusclePharm Corporation

Shares of Common Stock

We are registering an aggregate of 1,740,691offering               shares of our common stock $0.001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”) of MusclePharm Corporation (referred to herein as “we” ,“us”, “our”, “MusclePharm”, “Registrant”, or the “Company”) for resale by certain of our shareholders identified in this prospectus (the “Selling Shareholders”), of which 703,236 were issued to them in the March 2013 Private Placement, 100,000 shares were issued inon a May 2013 Private Placement, 150,000 were issued in a June 2013 Private Placement and an aggregate of 787,455 of which were issued pursuant to three consulting agreements (the “Resale Shares”). Please see “Selling Shareholders” beginning at page 60.firm commitment basis.

The Selling Shareholders may offer to sell the Resale Shares at fixed prices, at prevailing market prices at the time of sale, at varying prices or at negotiated prices, and will pay all brokerage commissions and discounts attributable to the sale of such shares. The Selling Shareholders will receive all of the net proceeds from the offering of their shares.

The Resale Shares may be sold by the Selling Shareholders to or through underwriters or dealers, directly to purchasers or through agents designated from time to time. For additional information regarding the methods of sale you should refer to the section entitled “Plan of Distribution” in this Prospectus.

Our common stock is presently quoted on the OTCBBPink Open Market maintained by OTC Markets Group, or the OTC Pink, under the symbol “MSLP.OB”.“MSLP.” On July 9, 2013,May      , 2022, the last reported sale price of our common stock as reported on the OTC Pink was $      per share, which giving effect to a one for      reverse stock split of our common stock to be effected prior to or upon the effective date of our registration statement, equates to $      . As a result, we assumed a public offering price per share of $      . The assumed public offering price used throughout this prospectus has been included for illustration purposes only. The actual offering price may differ materially from the assumed price used in the prospectus and will be determined by negotiations between us and the representatives of the underwriters and may not be indicative of prices that will prevail in the trading market.

We have applied to list our common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the OTC BB was $10.85symbol “MSLP,” which listing is a condition to this offering. No assurance can be given that our application will be approved.

The share and per share.

Our business and an investmentshare information in this prospectus reflects, other than in our securities involveFinancial Statements and the Notes thereto, a proposed reverse stock split of the authorized and outstanding common stock at an anticipated ratio of 1-for- to occur immediately following the effective date but prior to the closing of the offering.

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. See “RiskYou should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described under the heading “Risk Factors” beginning on page 87 of this prospectus before making a decision to purchase our securities.

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (“SEC”) NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THESE SECURITIES OR PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

Per ShareTotal
Initial public offering price$$
Underwriting discounts and commissions(1)$$
Proceeds, before expenses, to us$$

(1)We have agreed to reimburse the underwriters for certain expenses and the underwriters will receive compensation in addition to underwriting discounts and commissions. See the section titled “Underwriting” beginning on page 64 of this prospectus for additional disclosure regarding underwriter compensation and offering expenses.

We have granted the underwriters an option for a discussionperiod of      information that you should consider before investing indays to purchase up to              additional shares of our securities.Common Stock at the public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions.

NeitherThe underwriters expect to deliver the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any stateCompany’s securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.purchasers on or about        , 2022.

Roth Capital Partners

The date of this prospectus is July 15, 2013is_________, 2022.

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY1
Prospectus SummaryRISK FACTORS37
Risk FactorsCAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS917
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Industry DataUSE OF PROCEEDS1618
Use of ProceedsCAPITALIZATION
Price Range of Common Stock18
Dividend Policy18
Dilution
Capitalization19
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsMARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS2021
BusinessDILUTION2822
ManagementMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULT OF OPERATIONS3924
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and ManagementBUSINESS5037
Certain Relationships and Related Party TransactionsMANAGEMENT5249
Description of Series D Preferred StockEXECUTIVE COMPENSATION5553
Description of SecuritiesSECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT5457
Plan of DistributionCERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS6359
Legal MattersDESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES6462
ExpertsUNDERWRITING64
Where You Can Find More InformationLEGAL MATTERS6571
Index to Financial StatementsEXPERTS6672
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION73
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSF-1

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectus that we may specifically authorize to be delivered or made available to you. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with any information other than that contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectus we may authorize to be delivered or made available to you. We take no responsibility for,have not, and canthe underwriters have not, authorized anyone to provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any otheryou with additional information or information different from that others may give you. This prospectus may only be used where it is legal to offer and sell our securities. The informationcontained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectus. Neither the delivery of this prospectus nor the sale of our securities means that the information contained in this prospectus or any free writing prospectus is accurate only as ofcorrect after the date of this prospectus regardless of the time of delivery of thisor such free writing prospectus. This prospectus or any sale of our securities. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date. We areis not making an offer to sell or the solicitation of thesean offer to buy our securities in any circumstances under which the offer or solicitation is unlawful or in any state or other jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted.

No person is authorized in connection with this prospectus to give any information or to make any representations about us, the securities offered hereby or any matter discussed in this prospectus, other than the information and representations contained in this prospectus. If any other information or representation is given or made, such information or representation may not be relied upon as having been authorized by us.

Neither we nor any of the underwriters have done anything that would permit this offering or possession or distribution of this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than the United States. You are required to inform yourself about, and to observe any restrictions relating to, this offering and the distribution of this prospectus.

We also use certain trademarks, trade names, and logos that have not been registered. We claim common law rights to these unregistered trademarks, trade names and logos.

ii

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

ThisThe following summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus and is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information and financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. It does not contain all of the information that may be important to you should consider in makingand your investment decision. Before investing in our securities, youYou should carefully read this entire prospectus, including our financial statements and the related notes and the informationmatters set forth under the headings “Risk Factors” andFactors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in each caseOperations,” and our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Unless otherwise stated or the In this prospectus, unless context requires otherwise, references in this prospectus to “we,” “us,” “our,” “MusclePharm”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”“the Company” refer to MusclePharm Corporation

Overview

MusclePharm is a scientifically-driven, performance lifestyle company that develops, manufactures, markets and informationdistributes branded sports nutrition products and functional energy beverages. Since our incorporation in this prospectus gives effect2006, we have developed a comprehensive product portfolio, which has fueled the widespread recognition of our brands, MusclePharm and FitMiss. Today, these brands are sold in more than 100 countries globally, supported by our diversified and industry-leading distribution partners. We believe our strong international presence has allowed us to attract a larger and more engaged social audience than our competitive peers, Our global reach to a large and engaged customer base enables us to achieve The MusclePharm Promise of helping professional athletes and everyday active individuals reach their maximum potential with the most scientifically advanced, safe and nutritious sports supplementation products possible.

“The MusclePharm Promise” guides our endeavors to support the health of individuals and is comprised of three key pillars:

Leading by Example. We place considerable emphasis on transparency, high-quality ingredients, innovation and science. Our products undergo rigorous, independent third-party testing to ensure safe, quality ingredients to support all levels of athletic ability. Tests performed on products include banned substance testing and protein verification, among others.
Supporting Active Lifestyles. Our product portfolio is designed for athletes of all levels and anyone who pursues an active, healthy lifestyle. We offer a broad range of performance powders, capsules, tablets, bars and functional energy beverages that satisfy the needs of enthusiasts and professionals alike.
Enhancing Public Health. Through our Specialty, International, Food, Drug, and Mass (“FDM”), and newly introduced Grocery and Convenience distribution channels, we are able to reach athletes and active individuals of all types and demographics. We believe in the importance of our consumers having access to our products where and when they need them.

Our Products

Our product portfolio consists of two categories, sports nutrition and functional energy beverages, and targets a variety of fitness enthusiasts and professionals, as well as individuals who lead an active lifestyle.

1

Sports Nutrition

Sport Series. In order to cover the needs of athletes, we introduced our scientifically-advanced, performance-driven Sport Series category. These award-winning , independently-tested products help fuel athletes safely by increasing strength, energy, endurance, recovery and overall athletic performance. It features our Combat Protein Powder, a top selling five-protein blend on the market, currently available in 4 flavors.
Essentials Series. To meet the day-in and day-out demands of fitness and sport, the Essentials Series (formerly known as the Core Series) line of supplements exists for athletes to take daily. These products include daily staples for a healthy body, such as BCAA, creatine, glutamine, carnitine, CLA, fish oil, a multi-vitamin and more.
FitMiss. Designed and formulated specifically for the female body, FitMiss sports nutrition products are complementary to any active female’s diet. In seeking a stronger, more balanced foundation, FitMiss ingredients support women in areas of weight management, lean muscle mass, body composition, and general health and wellness. Currently, FitMiss protein powder is available in 2 flavors.
On-the-Go. As more and more consumers are seeking healthier and convenient snacking options, retailers across multiple channels are capitalizing on this emerging trend by aggressively expanding their better-for-you assortments. Our On-the-Go portfolio of ready to eat products includes our award-winning Combat Crunch Protein Bars, currently available in 4 flavors.

Functional Energy Beverages

Combat Energy. In order to tap into the ever-growing functional beverage market, we recently launched our Combat Energy drink line. Unlike traditional energy drinks, Combat Energy has zero sugar and zero calories and features the functional benefits of 300mg of caffeine and 600mg of BCAA aminos. Our Combat Energy line is available in the three flavors: Green Apple, Grapefruit Lime and Black Cherry.
FitMiss Energy. Based on the feedback we received from female consumers, we developed and meticulously formulated FitMiss Energy. This recently launched product features 200 milligrams of caffeine per can, zero calories, zero sugar, MusclePharm’s proprietary BCAA blend, Biotin and no artificial colors or flavors. Currently, we sell this functional energy beverage in the following three flavors: Pineapple Coconut, Mango Sunshine and Watermelon Waterfall.

Industry

Global Sports Nutrition

According to a 2021 analysis by Grand View Research, the global sports nutrition market is expected to experience double digit growth, growing at a compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of 10.9% from 2021 to 2028. A rise in demand is expected to stem from consumers’ increased focus on self-care, preventive medication and fitness. This heightened focus is particularly due to the 1-for-850 reverse stock splitrapidly growing number of individuals with diabetes and obesity that are at risk of serious illness from COVID-19. Given that our products are designed to enhance one’s health and fitness ability, we expect to benefit and capitalize on these attractive industry tailwinds.

Global Functional Beverages

According to a 2021 report by Fior Markets, the functional beverage market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 7.1% from 2021 to 2028. This growth is expected to stem from an increased demand for ready-to-drink beverages by consumers who seek to maintain their health despite their hectic, busy lifestyles. We believe this growth will be compounded even more by millennials’ strong preference for foods that are convenient and have diverse nutritional profiles. For these reasons, we anticipate that our newly introduced Combat Energy and FitMiss Women’s Complete Energy will experience increased demand, along with our On-The-Go product line.

2

Our Strengths

Consumer Awareness of Our Brands

According to Nutritionix.com, our Combat Protein Powder is the fourth best protein brand in the world, and Grand Review Research names MusclePharm as one of the top players in the North American sports nutrition market. For these reasons, we believe consumers have a strong appetite for our brand and products, which is exemplified by our large and engaged social media following. Widespread brand recognition as one of the safest, most trusted and reliable performance lifestyle companies is a strength we seek to maintain, as it allows for organic growth and fosters the adoption of new product innovations.

Strong Intellectual Property

We believe that protecting our intellectual property is crucial to the continued successful implementation of our common stock thatbusiness strategy and marketing our products. Therefore, our policy is to rigorously pursue registrations for all trademarks associated with our products. We have over 39 trademark applications in the United States, 29 of which are currently registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Our registered trademarks include registrations of our house marks, as well as marks associated with our core product lines.

We also have filed for protection of various marks throughout the world and are committed to a significant long-term strategy to build and protect the MusclePharm and FitMiss brands globally. The “MusclePharm” and “FitMiss” marks have been granted final trademark registration effective in 10 countries, including the United States.

Asset Light Business Model

Through our asset light model, we effectedachieve low capital expenditures, which we believe is critical to the generation of high free cash flows, gross margin, and lower commodity pricing. Currently, we outsource all manufacturing, testing and bottling to third-parties, and despite challenges in 2020 due to COVID-19, we believe our asset light model will enable us to achieve strong results and profitability in future quarters. For these reasons, we believe our business is uniquely positioned for profitability, without sacrificing the support of our growth initiatives.

Growth Strategy

Product Innovation

We believe continued innovation in delivery techniques and ingredients, new product lines, and new products in existing lines is important to sustaining and creating new market opportunities, meeting consumer demand, and strengthening customer relationships. Over the last several years, we have launched several new products to meet changing consumer needs and to accelerate our growth. In 2021, we rolled out our functional energy beverages lines under the MusclePharm and FitMiss brands. With continued market expansion of functional beverages, coupled with consumers’ increased focus on November 26, 2012.ready-to-drink healthy alternatives, we expect our zero sugar and zero calorie energy drinks to benefit from these better-for-you industry tailwinds. Similarly, in 2019, we expanded our On-The-Go assortments with the introduction of gluten free and non-GMO protein products, along with new flavors of our award-winning Combat Crunch Protein Bars. These On-The-Go product assortments target a wide and growing audience, as consumers increasingly demand convenient and ready-to-eat snacks with healthy, diverse nutritional profiles. We continuously monitor market opportunities and consumer trends in order to strategically plan and execute future product innovations. We continue to drive innovation in our already popular protein powder line and in 2021 we launched a new and improved formula, delivering better taste and mixability in our two top selling products, Combat 100% Whey and Combat Protein powder.to To maintain strong demand for our functional energy beverages, we will closely monitor and evaluate customer feedback for future product innovations to sustain our leadership position in the beverage market.

3

Expand Sales in Current and New Channels

We currently distribute our products across all major global retail channels – Specialty, International and FDM. This, paired with our large e-commerce customers, allows us to reach every relevant market in the world. Due to the high competition within these channels, and the ever-changing customer trends, we have undertaken a number of initiatives to expand into new distribution channels, increase product trial, and amplify brand messaging.

As we continue to scale our functional energy beverages, we expect to increase our distribution points through Grocery and Convenience channels and expect product trial to increase, providing us with the opportunity to convert trial customers into loyal, repeat purchasers, and ultimately, consumers of our broader product categories. While these initiatives are targeted towards acquiring new, loyal customers, we plan to grow with existing customers through our established, industry-leading distribution partners in the Specialty, International, and FDM. Through increased store penetration and shelf-space, we believe we can grow sales of our functional energy beverages with existing customers by providing widespread accessibility. Given the importance we place on widespread accessibility, we also plan on advancing our e-commerce presence through strategic partnerships, which we believe will not only enhance sales among new and existing customers but also further the global reach of our brand and products.

Leverage Existing Brand Awareness for New Products

As we continue to execute our growth strategy and focus on core and new product innovations, we plan on leveraging our existing brand awareness to successfully penetrate domestic and international markets. We believe our established brand recognition, recurring customer base, and far reach will further advance the adoption of our products and growth. In the past, our passionate and loyal following has demonstrated a keen appetite for new MusclePharm products and we believe this will continue to play a vital role in the success of future product rollouts.

Recent Developments

Private Placement

As previously disclosed by MusclePharm Corporation (the “Company”) on a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on June 9, 2022 (the “June 8-K”), as of June 3, 2022, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited and institutional investors, including certain investors from the Company’s October 2021 private offering of securities (the “October Offering”), which amends and restates the October 2021 Securities Purchase Agreement to, among other things, allow for the issuance of additional senior secured notes and warrants.

 

MusclePharm Corporation

Business Overview

MusclePharm Corporation was initially incorporated inPursuant to the State of NevadaAmended and Restated Securities Agreement, on August 4, 2006, under the name Tone in Twenty, for the purpose of engaging in the business of providing personal fitness training using isometric techniques (Tone in Twenty”).  Tone in Twenty was never able to raise the level of funding necessary to commence operations.  On February 18, 2010,June 10, 2022, the Company acquired allsold an aggregate of $3,081,875 in principal amount 20% Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Notes (the “June Notes”), resulting in gross proceeds to the issuedCompany of $2,465,500, exclusive of placement agent commission and outstanding equityfees and voting interests of Muscle Pharm, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, in exchange for 26,000,000 pre-splitother offering expenses, and warrants (the “June Warrants”) to purchase up to 22,013,393 shares (the “Warrant Shares”) of the Company’s common stock.stock (the “June Offering”).

Subject to certain exceptions, the June Notes accrue no interest, mature six months after issuance, or December 10, 2022, and are secured by the same collateral that secured the notes issued in the October Offering (the “October Notes” and together with the June Notes, the “Notes”). The shares were issued pursuantJune Warrants are exercisable for five years from the date of issuance at an exercise price of $0.231 per share, subject to adjustment. If at any time following the six-month anniversary of the date of issuance of the June Warrants, a registration statement covering the resale of the Warrant Shares is not effective, the holders may exercise the June Warrants by means of a cashless exercise. The Company is prohibited from effecting an exercise of the June Warrants to the extent that, certain Securities Exchange Agreement, dated February 1, 2010 (the Securities Exchange Agreement”).  Asas a result of this transaction, Muscle Pharm, LLC became a wholly owned subsidiarysuch exercise, the holder together with the holder’s affiliates, would beneficially own more than 4.99% of the Company.  The 26,000,000 pre-split shares represented approximately 99.7% of the common stock outstanding following the closing of such transaction.  As part of such transaction, the Company’s former President sold his 366,662 pre-split shares to Muscle Pharm, LLC for $25,000 and these shares were then cancelled.

As part of the Securities Exchange Agreement, the Company agreed to seek shareholder approval of an amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation changing the name of the Company to MusclePharm Corporation.”  This amendment was approved by a majority of the Company’s shareholders and the name change became effective on March 1, 2010.

MusclePharm currently manufactures and markets wide-ranging variety of high-quality sports nutrition products, including: AssaultTM , Battle FuelTM , Bullet ProofTM , CombatTM , SHRED Matrix®, and Re-con®.  These products are comprised of amino acids, herb, and proteins scientifically tested and proven as safe and effective for the overall health of athletes.  These nutritional supplements were created to enhance the effects of workouts, repair muscles, and nourish the body for optimal physical fitness.

Our Growth and Core Marketing Strategy

Our primary growth strategy is to:

·increase our product distribution and sales through increased market penetrations both domestically and internationally;

·increase our margins by focusing on streamlining our operations and seeking operating efficiencies in all areas of our operations;

·continue to conduct additional testing of the safety and efficacy of our products and formulate new products; and

·increase awareness of our products by increasing our marketing and branding opportunities through endorsements, sponsorships and brand extensions.

Our Core Marketing Strategy

Our core marketing strategy is to brand MusclePharm as the “must have” fitness brand for workout enthusiasts and elite athletes. We seek to be known as The Athletes Company® , run by athletes who create their products for other athletes, both professional and otherwise. We believe that our marketing mix of endorsers, sponsorships and providing sample products for our retail resellers to use is an optimal strategy to increase sales.

Recent Developments

Reverse Stock Split and Increase in Number of Authorized Shares of Common Stock

On November 26, 2012, we (i) effected a 1-for-850 reverse stock split of our common stock, including a proportionate reduction in the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 2.36 billion shares to 2.8 million shares of common stock, and (ii) amended our articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock (post reverse stock split) from 2,941,177 to 100 million effective November 27, 2012. Unless otherwise indicated, all share and per share amounts in this document have been changed to give effect to the reverse stock split.

Conversion of Warrants into Common Stock

In late September 2012, we issued 512,675 shares of our common stock to several accredited investors pursuant to conversions of warrants to purchase an aggregate of 723,747 shares of our common stock. As a result of these warrant conversions and other extinguishments of derivative liabilities during the quarter ended September 30, 2012, our stockholders’ deficit decreased from $11,013,113 at June 30, 2012 to $7,297,593 at September 30, 2012 and our derivative liabilities decreased from $7,908,960 at June 30, 2012 to $24,889 at September 30, 2012. On December 5, 2012, we converted a warrant exercisable for 4,902 shares of common stock into 3,677 shares of our common stock. Thereafter, our derivative liability was reduced to approximately $300 as of December 5, 2012.

Registered Direct Offerings

On February 4, 2013, we completed the final closing of our registered direct offering of an aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of our Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, at a public offering price of $8.00 per share pursuant to an offering registered with the SEC. Each share of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into two shares of common stock, subject to adjustment. Our net proceeds from the offering were approximately $10.8 million after placement agent discounts, and other offering expenses of $1.2 million. Net proceeds from this offering were used to reduce indebtedness and for other corporate purposes.

As of July 9, 2013, 1,355,000 Series D shares have been converted into 2,710,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and 145,000 shares of Series D preferred stock remain outstanding.

Private Placements of Common Stock

On March 26, 2013, the Company entered into subscription agreements with non-affiliated accredited investors foroutstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of 703,236 sharesthe Warrant Shares upon exercise of common stock pursuant to exemptions from registration under federal and state securities laws. The shares of common stock were sold for $8.50 per share. The gross proceeds to the Company of $6.0 million were reduced by commissions and issuance costs of $115,000. These shares of common stock are being registeredJune Warrants.

As previously disclosed in the registration statementJune 8-K, in connection with the closing of which this prospectus forms a part.the June Offering, the Company:

amended (i) the convertible secured promissory note issued to Ryan Drexler, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board of Directors, on November 29, 2020 (as amended on August 13, 2021) in the principal amount of $2,871,967 (the “Drexler November Note”) and (ii) the convertible secured promissory note issued to Ryan Drexler on August 13, 2021 in the principal amount of $2,457,549 (the “Drexler August Note” and together with the Drexler November Note, the “Drexler Notes”) to extend the maturity date of the Drexler Notes to June 10, 2025;
entered into an amendment to Ryan Drexler’s Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated February 1, 2018 (the “Drexler Employment Agreement”) pursuant to which Mr. Drexler’s cash compensation, including base salary and bonus, was decreased to $250,000 annually while any Notes remain outstanding; and
appointed Sabina Rizvi, the Company’s President and Chief Financial Officer, as a member of the board of directors of the Company.

On May 3, 2013, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with one non-affiliated accredited investor for the issuance of 100,000 shares of common stock pursuant to exemptions from federal and state securities laws. The shares of common stock were sold for $8.50 per share. These shares of common stock are being registered in this registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

4

On June 3, 2013, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with one non-affiliated accreditor investor for the issuance of 150,000 shares of common stock pursuant to exemptions from registration under federal and state securities laws. The shares of common stock were sold for $10.00 per share. The gross proceeds of $1,500,000 were reduced by commissions and issuance costs of $75,000. Those shares of common stock are being registered in this registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

Selected Risks Associated Withwith Our Business

Our business is subject to numerousa number of risks describedof which you should be aware before making a decision to invest in our common shares. These risks are discussed more fully in the section entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere insection of this prospectus. You should carefully consider theseThese risks before making an investment. Some of these risks include: include the following:

·Our business and operations are experiencing rapid growth. If we fail to effectively manage our growth, our business and operating results could be harmed;
·Our failure to respond appropriately to competitive challenges, changing consumer preferences and demand for new products could significantly harm our customer relationships and product sales;

·Our management has determined that our disclosure controls and procedures are ineffective which could result in material misstatements in our financial statements;

·If we fail to comply with the rules under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 related to disclosure controls and procedures, or, if we discover material weaknesses and other deficiencies in our internal control and accounting procedures, our stock price could decline significantly and raising capital could be more difficult;

·Our industry is highly competitive, and our failure to compete effectively could adversely affect our market share, financial condition and future growth;

·We rely on a limited number of customers for a substantial portion of our sales, and the loss of or material reduction in purchase volume by any of these customers would adversely affect our sales and operating results;results.

·Adverse publicity orOur failure to respond appropriately to competitive challenges, changing consumer perception of ourpreferences and demand for new products and any similar products distributed by others could significantly harm our reputationcustomer relationships and product sales..
Our industry is highly competitive, and our failure to compete effectively could adversely affect our salesmarket share, financial condition, and revenues;future growth.

·We rely on highly skilled personnel and, if we are unablehave a history of losses from operations, there is uncertainty as to retain or motivate key personnel, hire qualified personnel,when we may not be ablebecome consistently profitable, and our current indebtedness may limit our operating flexibility, which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to grow effectively;continue as a going concern.

·If we are unable to retain key personnel,Our multiple financing arrangements contain covenants that limit our ability to manage our business effectivelyincur additional debt and continue our growth could be negatively impacted;grant liens on assets.

·Mr. Drexler’s stock ownership gives him the ability to substantially influence the strategic direction of the Company and to direct the outcome of matters requiring stockholder approval.
Our operating results may fluctuate,common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC and the trading market in the securities is limited, which makes our results difficult to predict and could cause our results to fall short of expectations;

·We may be exposed to material product liability claims, which could increase our costs and adversely affect our reputation and business;

·Our insurance coverage or third party indemnification rights may not be sufficient to cover our legal claims or other losses that we may incurtransactions in the future;

·Our intellectual property rights are valuable,stock cumbersome and any inability to protect them couldmay reduce the value of our products and brand;an investment in the stock.

·We may be subject to intellectual property rights claims, which are costly to defend, could require us to pay damages and could limit our ability to sell some of our products;

·An increase in product returns could negatively impact our operating results and profitability;

·We have no manufacturing capacityongoing material weaknesses and anticipate continued reliance on third-party manufacturers for the development and commercialization of our products;

·A shortage in the supply of key raw materials could increase our costs or adversely affect our sales and revenues;

·A member of our management team has been involved in a bankruptcy proceeding and other failed business ventures that may expose us to assertions that we are not able to effectively manage our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and your investment in our securities;

·You may experience substantial dilution in the event we issue common stock in the future at a price below $4.00 per share;

·The conversion reset provision relatingfail to our Series D Preferred Stockmaintain effective systems of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, any of which could, among other things, result in difficulty for us to obtain future equity financing;

·We may issuesignificant additional sharescosts being incurred, cause a loss of preferred stock in the future that may adversely impact your rights as holders of our common stock;

·Our common stock is quoted on the OTCBB which may have an unfavorable impact on our stock price and liquidity;

·Nevada corporations laws limit the personal liability of corporate directors and officers and require indemnification under certain circumstances;

·Future financings through debt securities and preferred stock may restrict our operations;
·Our common stock price may be volatile and could fluctuate widely in price, which could result in substantial losses for investors;

·If our common stock becomes subject to the SEC’s penny stock rules, broker-dealers may experience difficulty in completing customer transactions and trading activityconfidence in our securities may befinancial reporting, and adversely affected;

·Because certain of our stockholders control a significant number of shares of our common stock, they may have effective control over actions requiring stockholder approval;

·If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or if they change their recommendations regarding our stock adversely, our stock price andaffect the trading volume could decline;

·A sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stockstock.
Even if we meet the initial listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market, there can be no assurance that we will be able to decline and may impaircomply with the continued listing standards of the Nasdaq Capital Market. Our failure to meet the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market could result in a de-listing of our ability to raise capital in the future;Common Stock.

Corporate InformationProposed Changes to Our Capital Structure

We were incorporated in Nevada on August 4, 2006, under the name “Tone in Twenty”. On February 18, 2010, Tone in Twenty acquired allplan to effect a 1-for-     reverse split of our outstanding shares of common stock prior to effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. No fractional shares will be issued in connection with the reverse stock split and all such fractional interests will be rounded up to the nearest whole number of shares of common stock. The conversion and/or exercise prices of our issued and outstanding equityconvertible securities, including shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding stock options and voting interestswarrants, and conversion of Muscle Pharm, LLC,our outstanding convertible notes will be adjusted accordingly. All information presented in this prospectus assumes a Colorado limited liability company, in exchange for 30,5891-for- reverse split of our outstanding shares of its common stock. As a result ofstock, and unless otherwise indicated, all such amounts and corresponding conversion price and/or exercise price data set forth in this transaction, Muscle Pharm, LLC became a wholly owned subsidiary of Tone in Twenty, and Tone in Twenty changed its nameprospectus have been adjusted to “MusclePharm Corporation.” give effect to the assumed reverse stock split.

Corporate Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 4721 Ironton Street, Building A, Denver, Colorado 802396728 W. Sunset Rd., Suite 130, Las Vegas, NV. We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on August 4, 2006. Our Internet addresses are www.musclepharm.com and our telephone number is (303) 396-6100. Our website address is http://www.musclepharm.com.www.musclepharmcorp.com. The information contained on our websites is not incorporated by reference herein. prospectus, and you should not consider any information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is notas part of this prospectus.prospectus or in deciding whether to purchase our common shares.

Summary of the Offering

5

THE OFFERING

SharesCommon stock offered by us:1,740,691         shares of common stock
Common Stock outstanding prior to this Offering         Shares
Common Stock to be outstanding immediately after this Offering         Shares (      shares if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase up to an additional shares to cover over-allotments, if any)
Over-Allotment OptionWe have granted the underwriters an option for a period of      days from the date of this prospectus to purchase up to an additional           shares of Common Stock at the public offering price, less the underwriting discount.
Use of which 703,236 shares were issuedproceeds:We estimate that the net proceeds from this offering will be approximately $        or approximately $         if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, at an assumed public offering price of $  per share, after deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for working capital and other general corporate purposes. See “Use of Proceeds” for a more complete description of the intended use of proceeds from this offering.
Risk factors:An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk and could result in a private placementloss of your entire investment. Prior to making an investment decision, you should carefully consider all of the information in March 2013, 100,000 were issuedthis prospectus and, in a private placement in May 2013, 150,000 were issued in a private placement in June 2013 and an aggregate of 787,455 shares were issued pursuant to three consulting agreements entered into in February and March 2013.
Riskparticular, you should evaluate the risk factorsSee set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” beginning on page 8 of this prospectus and the other information included in this prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully consider before investing in our securities.7.
CommonOTCPink trading symbol:Our common stock OTC Bulletin Boardis currently quoted on the OTCPink under the trading symbol “MSLP”.
MSLP.OB
Proposed Nasdaq trading symbol:We have applied to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “MSLP.” No assurance can be given that our application will be approved.

Unless we indicate otherwise, all information inThe number of shares of common stock to be outstanding immediately after this prospectus:offering is based on 34,348,891 shares of common stock outstanding as of May 10, 2022 and excludes:

·is based on 9,269,12417,355,700 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants issued and outstanding asin the October 2021 private placement at exercise price of July 9, 2013;$0.78 per share;

·Excludes the conversion of the Company’s Series D Preferred Stock into an aggregate of 299,0005,399,441 shares of common stock;

·excludes 670 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options to purchase shares of common stock;

16,154,795 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding convertible notes; and

171,703 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options to purchase shares of common stock under our 2015 Incentive Compensation Plan at a weighted average exercise price of $425.00 per share as of July 9, 2013;$1.89.

·excludes 40,089

1,811,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding warrantsoptions to purchase shares of common stock under our 2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan at a weighted average exercise price of $13.31 per share as of July 9, 2013; and$0.40.

Except as otherwise indicated herein, all information in this prospectus reflects or assumes:

·excludes 86,276a one-for-        reverse stock split of our common stock effected on          , 2022;
no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase up to an additional  shares of common stock issuable upon vesting and settlement of outstanding restricted stock unit awards as of July 9, 2013.to cover over-allotments, if any.

SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

6

RISK FACTORS

The following selected financial information is derived from

Any investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before deciding whether to purchase our common stock, investors should carefully consider the Company’s Financial Statements appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Financial Statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this Prospectus. All share amounts and per share amounts reflect the completed 1-for-850 reverse stock split. The results indicatedrisks described below are not necessarily indicative of our future performance.

You should read this information together with the sections entitled “Capitalization”, “Management’s Discussion“Risk Factors” described in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, which are incorporated herein by reference, as may be amended, supplemented or superseded from time to time by other reports we file with the SEC. Our business, financial condition, operating results and Analysisprospects are subject to the following material risks as well as those material risks incorporated by reference. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently foreseeable to us may also impair our business operations. If any of Financial Condition and Resultsthe following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of Operations”our common stock could decline, and our stockholders may lose all or part of their investment in the shares of our common stock.

Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Capital

We will likely be required to raise additional financing to fund our operations.

We will likely be faced with the need to raise additional funds in the future. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, or at all.

Our senior notes payable agreement contains covenants that limit our ability to incur additional debt and grant liens on assets.

Our senior notes payable contains restrictive covenants that limit our ability to, among other things, incur additional debt and grant liens on assets. If we fail to comply with the restrictions in this debt instrument, a default may allow the debtor to accelerate the debt and to exercise remedies under the agreement, which includes the right to declare the principal amount of that debt, together with accrued and unpaid interest and other related amounts, immediately due and payable, and to exercise any remedies he may have to foreclose on assets that are subject to liens securing that debt.

If the Company is unable to extend the Senior Notes or elects not to do so, the Company will be required to repay the Senior Notes through equity issuances, additional borrowings, cash flows from operations and/or other sources of liquidity.

Our convertible promissory note agreement that we have entered into with Mr. Drexler may limit our ability to, among other things, incur additional debt. If we fail to comply with the restrictions in this debt instruments, a default may allow the debtor to accelerate the related debt and to exercise his remedies under the agreement, which includes the right to declare the principal amount of that debt, together with accrued and unpaid interest and other related amounts, immediately due and payable, and to exercise any remedies he may have to foreclose on assets that are subject to liens securing that debt.

For additional details regarding our indebtedness, see Note 10 to the accompanying consolidated financial statementsstatements.

Risks Related to Our Business and related notes included elsewhereIndustry

Our industry is highly competitive, and our failure to compete effectively could adversely affect our market share, financial condition, and future growth.

The sports nutrition market is highly competitive with respect to:

price;
shelf space and store placement;
brand and product recognition;
new product introductions; and
raw materials.

Many of our competitors are larger, more established companies and possess greater financial strength and other resources than we have. We face competition in this prospectus.the supplement market from a number of large nationally known manufacturers, private label brands and many smaller manufacturers.

Summary of Statements of Operations 

  Year Ended December 31  Three Months Ended March 31 
  2012  2011  2013  2012 
        (Unaudited) 
Sales – Net $67,055,215  $17,212,636  $22,561,227  $16,560,680 
Loss from operations $(8,735,811) $(16,220,160) $(721,480) $(727,293)
                 
Other expense $(10,216,984) $(7,060,790) $(6,640,501) $(15,308,000)
Net loss $(18,952,795) $(23,280,950) $(7,368,049) $(16,035,293)
Net loss per common share-basic diluted $(13.00) $(70.30) $(1.78) $(11.23)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic and diluted  1,458,757   331,158   4,128,679   1,428,024 
7

                 
Statement of Financial Position                 
                 
 As of March 31             
  2013             
                 
Cash $8,482,927             
Total Assets $20,537,257             
Current Liabilities $13,309,425             
Long-Term Debt $506             
Stockholders’ equity $7,227,326             

Our industry is highly regulated. We may in the future incur increased compliance costs and/or incur substantial judgments, fines, legal fees, and other costs.

The manufacturing, packaging, labeling, advertising, distribution, storage and sale of our products are regulated by various federal, state, and local agencies as well as those of each foreign country to which we distribute. Our compliance costs may increase in the future, and those increases could be material. In addition, governmental authorities may commence regulatory or legal proceedings, which could restrict the permissible scope of our product claims or the ability to manufacture and sell our products in the future. For example, the FDA regulates our products to ensure that the products are not adulterated or misbranded. Failure to comply with FDA requirements may result in, among other things, warning or untitled letters, injunctions, product withdrawals, recalls, product seizures, fines, and criminal proceedings.

Our advertising is subject to regulation by the FTC under the Federal Trade Commission Act. In recent years, the FTC has initiated numerous investigations of dietary supplement and weight loss products and companies. Additionally, some states also permit advertising and labeling laws to be enforced by private attorney generals, who may seek relief for consumers, seek class action certifications, seek class wide damages, and product recalls. Any of these types of actions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We have a history of losses from operations, there is uncertainty as to when we may become consistently profitable, and our current indebtedness may limit our operating flexibility, which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

We have historically incurred significant losses and experienced negative cash flows since inception. As of March 31, 2022, we had cash of $0.5 million, a working capital deficit of $36.3 million, a stockholders’ deficit of $38.1 million and an accumulated deficit of $211.8 million resulting from recurring losses from operations. As a result of a history of losses and financial condition, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

As a result of our history of losses and financial condition, there is doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon us maintaining profitable operations in the future and/or obtaining the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities when they come due. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates strategies to obtain financing required to fund our expenses and achieve a level of revenue adequate to support our current cost structure. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms or at all, or to generate an adequate level of revenues.

Our indebtedness, and history of losses, could have important consequences to us. For example, it could:

make us more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions, including effects of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic;
limit our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate requirements; and
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate.

8
 

RISK FACTORSIn addition, our ability to pay or refinance our debt depends on our successful financial and operating performance, cash flows and capital resources, which in turn depend upon prevailing economic conditions and certain financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include, among others:

economic and demand factors affecting our industry;
pricing pressures;
increased operating costs;
competitive conditions; and
other operating difficulties.

Any investmentIf our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay operating or capital expenditures, sell material assets or operations, seek to obtain additional capital, or restructure our debt.

We may incur additional indebtedness in our securities involves a high degreethe future. Our incurrence of risk. Investors should carefully consideradditional indebtedness would intensify the risks described belowabove.

Our operating results may fluctuate, which makes them difficult to predict and allthey may fall short of expectations.

Our operating results may fluctuate due to a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control. As a result, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful, and you should not rely on our past results as an indication of our future performance. Our quarterly, year-to-date, and annual expenses as a percentage of our revenues may differ significantly from our historical or projected rates. Our operating results in future quarters may not meet expectations.

Each of the information containedfollowing factors, as well as others, may affect our operating results:

our loss of one or more significant customers;
the introduction of successful new products by our competitors;
the effects of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic; and
adverse media reports on the use or efficacy of nutritional supplements.
increases in the price of raw materials

Because our business is changing and evolving, our historical operating results may not be useful to you in this prospectus before deciding whetherpredicting our future operating results.

If we are unable to purchaseretain key management personnel or hire qualified personnel, our securities.ability to manage our business effectively and grow could be negatively impacted.

Over the last few years, the Company has had significant employee turnover. Our future success depends in part on our ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate and retain key skilled management personnel and employees for all areas of our organization, particularly sales and marketing. Competition in our industry for qualified employees has been intense. The loss or limitation of the services of any of our key management employees, including as a result of illness, or our inability to hire qualified employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected by these risks if any of them actually occur. This prospectus also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the risks we face as described below and elsewhere in this prospectus.operations.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

Our business and operations are experiencing rapid growth. If we fail to effectively manage our growth, our business and operating results could be harmed.

We have experienced and expect to continue to experience rapid growthGrowth in our operations, which has placed, andbusiness will continue to place significant demands on our management, and our operational and financial infrastructure. If we do not effectively manage our growth, we may fail to attain operational efficiencies we are seeking, timely deliver products to our customers in sufficient volume or the quality of our products could suffer, which could negatively affect our operating results. To effectively manage this growth, we expect we will need to hire additional persons, particularly in sales and marketing, andthat we will need to continue to improve significantly our operational, financial and management controls and our reporting systems and procedures. TheseTo accomplish these objectives, we may need to hire additional employees, make certain enhancements to our technology systems, enhancements and improvements will require significantmake capital expenditures, and utilize management resources. Failure to implement these proposed growth objectives would likely hurtmeasures could have a material adverse effect on our ability to manage our growthbusiness, financial condition and our financial position.results of operations.

As of April 10, 2013, management has taken over the shipping of most product, other than drop shipments,

9

Risks Related to our Products, Manufacturing, the Markets in Which We Operated and Other External Risks

We rely on a limited number of customers fromfor a substantial portion of our 152,000 square footsales, and the loss of or material reduction in purchase volume by any of these customers would adversely affect our sales and operating results.

During the three months ended March 31, 2022, we had three customers who individually accounted for 59%, 13%, and 12% of our net revenue, and two customers that individually accounted for 59% and 17% of accounts receivable. During the three months ended March 31, 2021, we had three customers who individually accounted for 28%, 17% and 14% of our net revenue, and two customers that individually accounted for 32% and 21% of accounts receivable.

The Company’s retail customers have been and may continue to be affected by outbreaks of disease, such as epidemics or pandemics, including the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

The Company’s retail customers have been and continue to be affected by the ongoing global COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting volatility and uncertainty it has caused in the U.S. and international markets. Store closures and social distancing have adversely impacted the Company’s sales to retailers. The COVID-19 pandemic also has the potential to significantly impact our supply chain if the facilities of our third- party manufacturers, the distribution centercenters where our inventory is managed or the operations of our logistics and other service providers are disrupted, temporarily closed or experience worker shortages. We may also see disruptions or delays in Franklin, Tennessee. We have hiredshipments of certain materials or products.

As a warehouse manager, and relocated two shipping logistic individuals from our Denver, Colorado office to manage shipping. We also hired several local warehouse individuals to manage this process. We believe this efficiency will improve our shipping time and reduce our overall costresult of goods sold.

Additionally,the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak, the Company has hired six new salestransitioned most of its workforce to a remote working model, which may result in the Company experiencing lower work efficiency and marketing individualsproductivity, which in turn may adversely affect the Company’s business. As Company employees work from home and access the Company’s system remotely, the Company may be subject to continueheightened security risks, including the expansion and growthrisks of sales. The finance team has added four new staff members and our boardcyberattacks. Additionally, if any of directors appointedthe Company’s key management or other employees are unable to perform his or her duties for a new Chief Financial Officer on July 1, 2012. New controls and procedures have been implemented over sales orders and discountingperiod of time, including as well as newthe result of illness, the Company’s results of operations or financial controls, budgeting processes, daily and monthly monitoring reports along with dashboard reporting for aiding management in making good decisions.condition could be adversely affected.

The Company has appointed a five member Boardcannot reasonably estimate the length or severity of Directors, three of which are independent by the board. The Company has also appointed an audit committee, and compensation committee. Regular board meetings are held and task lists are reviewed and checked off with members of outside counselCOVID-19 pandemic or the related responses, or the extent to mitigate issues and promote further improvements around internal controls and reporting which the Company believes is much improved but not yet complete.disruption may materially impact the Company’s business, consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or consolidated cash flows.

Our failure to respond appropriately to competitive challenges, changing consumer preferences and demand for new products could significantly harm our customer relationships and product sales.

The nutritional sports supplement industrynutrition market is characterized by intense competition for product offeringsvery competitive, and the range of products is diverse and subject to rapid and frequent changes in consumer demand. Our failure to accurately predict accurately product trends could negatively impact our productsresults and cause our revenues to decline.

Our success with any particular product offering (whether new or existing) depends upon a number of factors, including our ability to:

·deliver quality products in a timely manner in sufficient volumes;

·accurately anticipate customer needs and forecast accurately to our manufacturers in an expanding business;manufacturers;

·differentiate our product offerings from those of our competitors;

·competitively price our products; and

·develop new products.

ProductsFurthermore, products often have to be promoted heavily in stores or in the media to obtain visibility and consumer acceptance. Acquiring distribution for products is difficult and often expensive due to slotting and other promotional charges mandated by retailers. Products can take substantial periods of time to develop consumer awareness, consumer acceptance and sales volume. Accordingly, some products may fail to gain or maintain sufficient sales volume and as a result may have to be discontinued. In a highly competitive marketplace, it may be difficult to have retailersretailer’s open stock-keeping units (sku’s)SKU’s for new products.

Our management has determined that certain disclosure controls and procedures may be ineffective, even though they have been improved upon, which could result in material misstatements in our financial statements.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. As of December 31, 2012, our management determined that some of our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective due to weaknesses in our financial closing process.

We intend to implement remedial measures designed to address the ineffectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, such as hiring several individuals with significant accounting, auditing and financial reporting experience and segregating our internal and external financial reporting among our larger financing and accounting staff, implementing more specific segregation of our accounting software and providing historical information more timely, such as monthly budgeting analysis and cash reporting. We have also adopted and implemented written procedures to document purchase orders, product discounts and product transition flow as well as analysis of our cost of goods sold. If these remedial measures are insufficient to address the ineffectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, or if material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control are discovered or occur in the future and the ineffectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures continues, we may fail to meet our future reporting obligations on a timely basis, our consolidated financial statements may contain material misstatements, we could be required to restate our prior period financial results, our operating results may be harmed, we may be subject to class action litigation, and if we gain a listing on a stock exchange, our common stock could be delisted from that exchange. Any failure to address the ineffectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures could also adversely affect the results of the periodic management evaluations regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures that are required to be included in our annual report on Form 10-K. Internal control deficiencies and ineffective disclosure controls and procedures could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. We can give no assurance that the measures we plan to take in the future will remediate the ineffectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures or that any material weaknesses or restatements of financial results will not arise in the future due to a failure to implement and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting or adequate disclosure controls and procedures or circumvention of these controls. In addition, even if we are successful in strengthening our controls and procedures, in the future those controls and procedures may not be adequate to prevent or identify irregularities or errors or to facilitate the fair presentation of our consolidated financial statements.

If we fail to comply with the rules under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 related to disclosure controls and procedures, or, if we discover material weaknesses and other deficiencies in our internal control and accounting procedures, our stock price could decline significantly and raising capital could be more difficult.

If we fail to comply with the rules under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 related to disclosure controls and procedures, or, if we discover additional material weaknesses and other deficiencies in our internal control and accounting procedures, our stock price could decline significantly and raising capital could be more difficult. Moreover, effective internal controls are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important to helping prevent financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and the trading price of our common stock could drop significantly. In addition, we cannot be certain that additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal controls will not be discovered in the future.

Our industry is highly competitive, and our failure to compete effectively could adversely affect our market share, financial condition and future growth.

The nutritional supplement industry is highly competitive with respect to:

10
 ·price;

·shelf space and store placement;

·brand and product recognition;

·new product introductions; and

·raw materials.

Most of our competitors are larger more established and possess greater financial, personnel, distribution and other resources than we have. We face competition in the health food channel from a limited number of large nationally known manufacturers, private label brands and many smaller manufacturers of dietary supplements.

We rely on a limited number of customers for a substantial portion of our sales, and the loss of or material reduction in purchase volume by any of these customers would adversely affect our sales and operating results.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, two of our customers accounted for an aggregate of approximately 45% of our sales. Our largest customer for the year ended December 31, 2012, accounted for 33% of our sales. For the year ended December 31, 2011, two customers accounted for approximately 55% of our sales and our largest customer represented 41% of our sales.

For the three months ended March 31, 2013, two of our customers accounted for an aggregate of approximately 46% of our sales. Our largest customer for the three months ended March 31, 2013, accounted for 35% of our sales. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, two of our customers accounted for an aggregate of approximately 56% of our sales. Our largest customer for the three months ended March 31, 2012, accounted for 38% of our sales.

The loss of any of our major customers, a significant reduction in purchases by any major customer, or, any serious financial difficulty of a major customer, could have a material adverse effect on our sales and results of operations.

Adverse publicity or consumer perception of our products and any similar products distributed by others could harm our reputation and adversely affect our sales and revenues.sales.

We believe we are highly dependent upon positive consumer perceptions of the safety and quality of our products as well as similar products distributed by other sports nutrition supplement companies. Consumer perception of sports nutrition supplements and our products in particular can be substantially influenced by scientific research or findings, national media attention and other publicity about product use.

Adverse publicity from these sources regarding the safety, quality, or efficacy of our products or nutritional supplements and our products could seriously harm our reputation and results of operations. The mere publication of news articles or reports asserting that such products may be harmful or questioning their efficacy could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, regardless of whether such news articles or reports are scientifically supported or whether the claimed harmful effects would be present at the dosages recommended for such products.

We rely on highly skilled personnel and, if we are unable to retain or motivate key personnel, hire qualified personnel, we may not be able to grow effectively.

Our performance largely depends on the talents and efforts of highly skilled individuals. Our future success depends on our continuing ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate and retain highly skilled personnel for all areas of our organization, particularly sales and marketing. Competition in our industry for qualified employees is intense. In addition, our compensation arrangements, such as our bonus programs, may not always be successful in attracting new employees or retaining and motivating our existing employees. Our continued ability to compete effectively depends on our ability to attract new employees and to retain and motivate our existing employees.

If we are unable to retain key personnel, our ability to manage our business effectively and continue our growth could be negatively impacted.

Our management employees include Brad J. Pyatt, L. Gary Davis, John H. Bluher, Richard Estalella, Jeremy R. DeLuca and Cory J. Gregory. These key management employees are primarily responsible for our day-to-day operations, and we believe our success depends in large part on our ability to retain them and to continue to attract additional qualified individuals to our management team. Currently, we have executed employment agreements with our key management employees. The loss or limitation of the services of any of our key management employees or the inability to attract additional qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Our operating results may fluctuate, which makes our results difficult to predict and could cause our results to fall short of expectations.

Our operating results may fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, many of which may be outside of our control. As a result, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful, and you should not rely on our past results as an indication of our future performance. Our quarterly, year-to-date, and annual expenses as a percentage of our revenues may differ significantly from our historical or projected rates. Our operating results in future quarters may fall below expectations. Each of the following factors may affect our operating results:

·our ability to deliver products in a timely manner in sufficient volumes;

·our ability to recognize product trends;

·our loss of one or more significant customers;

·the introduction of successful new products by our competitors; and

·adverse media reports on the use or efficacy of nutritional supplements.

Because our business is changing and evolving, our historical operating results may not be useful to you in predicting our future operating results.

The continuing effects of the most recent global economic crisis may impact our business, operating results, or financial condition.

The global economic crisis that began in 2008 has caused disruptions and extreme volatility in global financial markets and increased rates of default and bankruptcy, and has impacted levels of consumer spending. These macroeconomic developments could negatively affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. For example, if consumer spending decreases, this may result in lower sales.

We may be exposed to material product liability claims, which could increase our costs and adversely affect our reputation and business.

As a marketer and distributor of products designed for human consumption, we could be subject to product liability claims if the use of our products is alleged to have resulted in injury.injury or undesired results. Our products consist of vitamins, minerals, herbs, and other ingredients that are classified as dietary supplements and in most cases are not subject to pre-market regulatory approval in the United States or internationally. Previously unknown adverse reactions resulting from human consumption of these ingredients could occur.

We have not had any significant product liability claims filed against us but, in the future, we may be subject to various product liability claims, including among othersdue to tampering by unauthorized third parties, product contamination, and claims that our products had inadequate instructions for use, or inadequate warnings concerning possible side effects and interactions with other substances. The cost of defense can be substantially higher than the cost of settlement even when claims are without merit. The high cost to defend or settle product liability claims could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.results of operations, and our insurance, if any, may not be adequate.

In addition, the perception of our products resulting from a product liability claim also could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our insurance coverage or third partythird-party indemnification rights may not be sufficient to cover our legal claims or other losses that we may incur in the future.

We maintain insurance includingat what we believe are adequate levels for property, general product liability, product recall, director’s and productofficer’s liability, and workers’ compensation to protect ourselves against potential loss exposures. In the future, insurance coverage may not be available at adequate levels or on adequate terms to cover potential losses, including on terms that meet our customer’s or manufacturer’s requirements. If insurance coverage is inadequate or unavailable, we may face claims that exceed coverage limits or that are not covered, which could increase our costs and adversely affect our operating results.

Our intellectual property rightsChanges in the economies of the markets in which we do business may affect consumer demand for our products.

Consumer spending habits, including spending for our products, are valuable,affected by, among other things, prevailing economic conditions, levels of employment, fuel prices, changes in exchange rates, salaries and any inability to protect them could reducewages, the valueavailability of consumer credit, consumer confidence and consumer perception of economic conditions. Economic slowdowns in the markets in which we do business and an uncertain economic outlook may adversely affect consumer spending habits, which may result in lower sales of our products and brand.in future periods.

WeIn April 2020, we experienced a slowdown in sales to our retail customers, including our largest customer. While this decline was primarily offset by growth in our largest online customer, there can be no assurances that such growth will continue, or that we will have invested significantthe financial resources to protect our brands and intellectual property rights. However, we may be unableproduce the additional quantities required by this customer. A prolonged global or unwilling to strictly enforce our intellectual property rights, including our trademarks, from infringement. Our failure to enforce our intellectual property rightsregional economic downturn could diminish the value of our brands and product offerings and harmhave a material negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and future growth prospects.cash flows.

11

We may be subject to intellectual property rights claims, which are costly to defend, could require us to pay damages and could limit our ability to sell some of our products.

Our industry is characterized by vigorous pursuit and protection of intellectual property rights, which has resulted in protracted and expensive litigation for several companies. Third parties may assert claims of misappropriation of trade secrets or infringement of intellectual property rights against us or against our end customers or partners for which we may be liable.

As our business expands, the number of products and competitors in our markets increases and product overlaps occur, infringement claims may increase in number and significance. Intellectual property lawsuits are subject to inherent uncertainties due to the complexity of the technical issues involved, and we cannot be certain that we would be successful in defending ourselves against intellectual property claims. Further, many potential litigants have the capability to dedicate substantially greater resources than we can to enforce their intellectual property rights and to defend claims that may be brought against them. Furthermore, a successful claimant could secure a judgment that requires us to pay substantial damages or prevents us from distributing products or performing certain services.

An increase in productProduct returns could negatively impact our operating results and profitability.

We permit the return of damaged or defective products and accept limited amounts of product returns in certain instances. While such returns from established customers have historically been nominal and within management’s expectations and the provisions established, future return rates may differ from those experienced in the past. Any significant increase in damaged or defective products or expectedaccepted returns could have a material adverse effect on our operating results for the period or periods in which such returns materialize.

We have no manufacturing capacity and anticipate continued reliancerely on third-party manufacturers for the development and commercializationproduction of our products.

We do not currently operate manufacturing facilities for production of our products. We lack the resources and the capabilities to manufacture our products on a commercial scale. We do not intend to develop facilities for the manufacture of products in the foreseeable future. We rely on third-party manufacturers to produce bulk products required to meet our sales needs. Wequality and market needs, and plan to continue to rely upondo so. If our contract manufacturers fail to manufacture commercial quantities of our products.

Our contract manufacturers’ failure to achieve and maintain high manufacturing standards in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, or the incidence of manufacturing errors,and processes, it could result in consumer injury or death, product shortages, product recalls or withdrawals, delays or failures in product testing or delivery, cost overruns or other problems that could seriously harm our business. Contract manufacturers often encounter difficulties involving production yields, quality control and quality assurance, as well as shortages of qualified personnel. Our existing manufacturers and any future contract manufacturers may not perform as agreed or may not remain in the contract manufacturing business. In the event of a natural disaster or business failure, strike or other difficulty,including due to bankruptcy of a contract manufacturer, we may not be unableable to replacesecure a third-party manufacturer in a timely manner and the productionreplacement of our products would be interrupted, resultingon a timely or cost-effective basis, which could result in delays, additional costs and reduced revenues. Additionally, our third-party manufacturers have been and may continue to be negatively affected by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

A shortage in the supply of key raw materials or price increases could increase our costs or adversely affect our sales and revenues.sales.

All of our raw materials for our products are obtained from third-party suppliers. Since all of the ingredients in our products are commonly used, we have not experienced any shortages or delays in obtaining raw materials. If circumstances changed,change, shortages could result in materially higher raw material prices or adversely affect our ability to have a product manufactured. Prices for our raw materials can and do fluctuate. Price increases from a supplier would directly affect our profitability if we are not able to pass price increases on to customers. Our inability to obtain adequate supplies of raw materials in a timely manner or a material increase in the price of our raw materials could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, our third-party suppliers have been and may continue to be negatively affected by the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Risks Related to our Intellectual Property

Our intellectual property rights are valuable, and any inability to protect them could reduce the value of our products and brand.

We have invested significant resources to protect our brands and trademarks. However, we may be unable or unwilling to strictly enforce our intellectual property rights, including our brands and trademarks, from infringement. Our failure to enforce our intellectual property rights could diminish the value of our brands and product offerings and harm our business and future growth prospects.

BecauseWe may be subject to intellectual property rights claims, which are costly to defend, could require us to pay damages and could limit our ability to sell some of our products.

Our industry is characterized by vigorous pursuit and protection of intellectual property rights, which has resulted in protracted and expensive litigation for several companies. Third parties may assert claims of misappropriation of trade secrets or infringement of intellectual property rights against us or against our end customers or partners for which we may be liable. Intellectual property lawsuits are subject to numerous laws and regulations,inherent uncertainties due to the complexity of the technical issues involved, and we cannot be certain that we would be successful in defending ourselves against intellectual property claims.

Further, many potential litigants have the capability to dedicate substantially greater resources than we can to enforce their intellectual property rights and to defend claims that may become involved in litigationbe brought against them. Furthermore, a successful claimant could secure a judgment that requires us to pay substantial damages or prevents us from timedistributing products or performing certain services.

12

Risks Related to time, we could incur substantial judgments, fines, legal fees and other costs.Our Capital Stock

Our industry is highly regulated. The manufacture, labeling and advertising for our products are regulated by various federal, state and local agencies as well as those of each foreign country to which we distribute. These governmental authorities may commence regulatory or legal proceedings, which could restrict the permissible scope of our product claims orMr. Drexler’s stock ownership gives him the ability to manufacturesubstantially influence the strategic direction of the Company and sell our products into direct the future. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, regulates our products to ensure that the products are not adulterated or misbranded. Failure to comply with FDA requirements may result in, among other things, injunctions, product withdrawals, recalls, product seizures, fines and criminal prosecutions. Our advertising is subject to regulation by the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, under the Federal Trade Commission Act. In recent years the FTC has initiated numerous investigationsoutcome of dietary supplement and weight loss products and companies. Additionally, some states also permit advertising and labeling laws to be enforced by private attorney generals, who may seek relief for consumers, seek class action certifications, seek class wide damages and product recalls of products sold by us. Any of these types of adverse actions against us by governmental authorities or private litigants could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A member of our management team has been involved in a bankruptcy proceeding and other failed business ventures that may expose us to assertions that we are not able to effectively manage our business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and your investment in our securities.

Our chief executive officer and co-chairman of our board of directors, Brad J. Pyatt, has been involved in a personal bankruptcy and other failed business ventures. This may expose us to assertions by others that our management team may not know how to effectively run a business. To address this risk, our board of directors has devoted significant time and energy to bolstering our management team with individuals who have public company experience and financial expertise, as well as adding independent board members. Notwithstanding these efforts, if our business partners and investors do not have confidence in our management team, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and your investment in our company.

Because certain of our stockholders control a significant number of shares of our common stock, they may have effective control over actionsmatters requiring stockholder approval.

AsMr. Ryan Drexler, our Chairman of July 9, 2013, our directors, executive officers,the Board and their respective affiliates, beneficially ownChief Executive Officer, owns approximately 19.45%49.2% of our outstanding shares of common stock. Also, two of our executive officers own 51 shares of our Series B Preferred Stock, which has voting control of the Company. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, would haveMr. Drexler is able to substantially influence the ability to controlstrategic direction of the Company and the outcome of matters submitted torequiring approval by our stockholders for approval, includingstockholders. Mr. Drexler’s interests may not be, at all times, the election of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially allsame as those of our assets. In addition, theseother stockholders, acting together, would have the ability toand his control the management and affairs ofmay delay, deter or prevent acts that may be favored by our company. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership might harm the market price of our common stock by:other stockholders.

·delaying, deferring or preventing a change in corporate control;

·impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving us; or

·discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.

The conversion reset provision relating to our Series D Preferred Stock could result in difficulty for us to obtain future equity financing.

Because the conversion price reset provisions relating to our Series D Preferred Stock discussed above are so significant and to the potential detriment of common stockholders, it may make it more difficult for us to raise any future equity capital. This potential difficulty should be reviewed in light of our existing levels of little capital and significant working capital deficit. As of July 9, 2013 approximately 90% of the preferred stock issued in the Series D offering has been converted to common stock, greatly reducing this risk.

We may, in the future, issue additional shares of common stock and/or preferred stock, which would reduce investors’ percent of ownership and may dilute our share value.

Our articles of incorporation, as amended, authorize the issuance of 100,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock,stock. As of which (i) 5,000,000 shares have been designated as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, (ii) 51 shares have been designated as Series B Preferred Stock, (iii) 500 shares have been designated as Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and (iv) 1,600,000 shares have been designated as Series D Convertible Preferred Stock. The articles of incorporation authorize our board of directors to prescribe the series and the voting powers, designations, preferences, limitations, restrictions and relative rights of any undesignatedMay 10, 2022, 34,348,891 shares of our common stock were outstanding, and we did not have any outstanding shares of preferred stock. As of May 10, 2022, 34,348,891 shares of our common stock were outstanding. The future issuance of common stock and preferred stock may result in substantial dilution in the percentage of our common stock held by our then existing stockholders. We may value any common stock or preferred stock issued in the future on an arbitrary basis. The issuance of common stock for future services or acquisitions or other corporate actions may have the effect of diluting the value of the shares held by our investors and might have an adverse effect on any trading market for our common stock.

We may issue additional shares of preferred stock in the future that may adversely impact your rights as holders of our common stock.

Our articles of incorporation, as amended, authorize us to issue shares of preferred stock in various series. Currently, we have 51 shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding, which shares have voting control of the Company. Each share of our Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into 200 shares of our common stock although no shares of this series are outstanding. Each shares of our Series D Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into two shares of our common stock. In addition, our board of directorsBoard has the authority to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of our authorized but undesignated preferred stock, as well as the authority to issue shares of such preferred stock, without further stockholder approval. As a result, our board of directorsBoard could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that would grant to holders preferred rights to our assets upon liquidation, the right to receive dividends before dividends are declared to holders of our common stock, and the right to the redemption of such preferred stock, together with a premium, prior to the redemption of the common stock.

To the extent that we do issue such additional shares of preferred stock, your rights as holders of common stock could be impaired thereby, including, without limitation, dilution of your ownership interests in us. In addition, shares of preferred stock could be issued with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control or make removal of management more difficult, which may not be in your interest as a holder of common stock.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCBBOTC Markets, which may have an unfavorable impact on our stock price and liquidity.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCBB. The OTCBB is a significantly more limited market thanOTC Pink Tier, an automated quotation service operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc under the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ Stock Market.symbol “MSLP.” The quotation of our shares on the OTCBBOTC may result in a less liquid market available for existing and potential stockholders to trade shares of our common stock, in part because of the inability or unwillingness of certain investors to acquire shares of common stock not traded on a national securities exchange and could depress the trading price of our common stock and could have a long-term adverse impact on our ability to raise capital in the future.

A DTC “Chill” on the electronic clearingOur share price has been and may continue to be volatile.

The market price of tradesour common shares is subject to significant fluctuations in response to a multitude of factors, including variations in our securitiesquarterly operating results and financial condition. Factors other than our financial results that may affect our share price include, but are not limited to, market expectations of our performance, market perception of our industry, the activities of our managers, customers, and investors, and the level of perceived growth in the future may affectindustry in which we participate, general trends in the liquiditymarkets for our products, general economic business and political conditions in the countries and regions in which we conduct our business, and changes in government regulation affecting our business, many of which are not within our control. In addition, like many companies of our stock and our ability to raise capital.

Because our common stock is considered a “penny stock,” there is a risk that the Depository Trust Company (DTC) may place a “chill” on the electronic clearing of trades in our securities. This may lead some brokerage firms to be unwilling to accept certificates and/or electronic deposits ofsize with low trading volume, our stock price may fluctuate significantly for reasons unrelated to our business.

13

Market and other securitieseconomic conditions may negatively impact our business, financial condition and also someshare price.

Concerns over inflation, energy costs, geopolitical issues, the U.S. mortgage market and a declining real estate market, unstable global credit markets and financial conditions, and volatile oil prices have led to periods of significant economic instability, diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence and discretionary spending, diminished expectations for the global economy and expectations of slower global economic growth going forward, increased unemployment rates, and increased credit defaults in recent years. Our general business strategy may be adversely affected by any such economic downturns, volatile business environments and continued unstable or unpredictable economic and market conditions. If these conditions continue to deteriorate or do not accept trades in our securities altogether. In the past, DTC has placed a deposit chill on our shares, and although the chill is currently removed, no assurance can be given that a chill will not be reinstated in the future. A future DTC chill would affect the liquidity of our securities andimprove, it may make itany necessary debt or equity financing more difficult to purchase or sell our securitiescomplete, more costly, and more dilutive. Failure to secure any necessary financing in the open market. It may alsoa timely manner and on favorable terms could have ana material adverse effect on our abilitygrowth strategy, financial performance, and share price and could require us to delay or abandon development or commercialization plans.

Future sales and issuances of our securities could result in additional dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders and could cause our share price to fall.

We expect that significant additional capital will be needed in the future to continue our planned operations, including research and development, increased marketing, hiring new personnel, commercializing our products, and continuing activities as an operating public company. To the extent we raise additional capital becauseby issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience substantial dilution. We may sell common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in a manner we determine from time to time. If we sell common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities in more than one transaction, investors may be unablematerially diluted by subsequent sales. Such sales may also result in material dilution to easily resell our existing stockholders, and new investors could gain rights superior to our existing stockholders.

We may be at risk of securities intoclass action litigation.

We may be at risk of securities class action litigation. In the market.past, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies have experienced significant stock price volatility, particularly when associated with binary events such as clinical trials and product approvals. If we face such litigation, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could harm our business and results in a decline in the market price of our common stock.

Financial reporting obligations of being a public company in the United States are expensive and time-consuming, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to compliance matters.

As a publicly traded company we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses. The obligations of being a public company in the United States require significant expenditures and places significant demands on our management and other personnel, including costs resulting from public company reporting obligations under the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations regarding corporate governance practices, including those under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. These rules require the establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and procedures, internal control over financial reporting and changes in corporate governance practices, among many other complex rules that are often difficult to implement, monitor and maintain compliance with. Our inabilitymanagement and other personnel will need to raise capitaldevote a substantial amount of time to ensure that we comply with all of these requirements and to keep pace with new regulations, otherwise we may fall out of compliance and risk becoming subject to litigation among other potential problems.

14

We have ongoing material weaknesses and may in the future fail to maintain effective systems of internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, any of which could, among other things, result in significant additional costs being incurred, cause a loss of confidence in our financial reporting, and adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

We have concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of March 31, 2022, due to the existence of material weaknesses in such controls, and we have also concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2022 all as described in Item 4, “Controls and Procedures,” of our Quarterly Report on terms acceptableForm 10-Q. Remediation efforts to us, if at all,address the identified weaknesses are just beginning . Continuing costs to remedy these material weaknesses and to address inquiries from regulators may be significant and may require significant time from our management and other personnel, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to remedy the material weaknesses.

The incurrence of significant additional expense, or the requirement that management and other personnel devote significant time to these matters could reduce the time available to execute on our business strategies and could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We also cannot assure you that additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting will not arise or be identified in the future. If our remediation measures are insufficient to address the identified deficiencies, or if additional deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting are discovered or occur in the future, our consolidated financial statements may contain material misstatements and we could be required to restate our financial results and may be unable to make our filings with the SEC on a timely basis. Moreover, because of the inherent limitations of any control system, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis, or at all.

If we are unable to provide reliable and timely financial reports in the future, our business and reputation may be further harmed. Failures in internal controls may negatively affect investor confidence in our management and the accuracy of our financial statements and disclosures or result in adverse publicity and concerns from investors and commercial customers, any of which could have a negative effect on the price of our shares, subject us to regulatory investigations and penalties and/or shareholder litigation, and materially adversely impact our business and financial condition.

Nevada corporationscorporation laws limit the personal liability of corporate directors and officers and require indemnification under certain circumstances.

Section 78.138(7) of the Nevada Revised Statutes provides that, subject to certain very limited statutory exceptions or unless the articles of incorporation provide for greater individual liability, a director or officer of a Nevada corporation is not individually liable to the corporation or its stockholders for any damages as a result of any act or failure to act in his or her capacity as a director or officer, unless it is proven that the act or failure to act constituted a breach of his or her fiduciary duties as a director or officer and such breach involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law. We have not included in our articles of incorporation any provision intended to provide for greater liability as contemplated by this statutory provision.

In addition, Section 78.7502(3) of the Nevada Revised Statutes provides that to the extent a director or officer of a Nevada corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense of certain actions, suits or proceedings (which may include certain stockholder derivative actions), the corporation shall indemnify such director or officer against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such director or officer in connection therewith.

Risks Related to this Offering

YouEven if we meet the initial listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market, there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the continued listing standards of the Nasdaq Capital Market. Our failure to meet the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market could result in a de-listing of our Common Stock.

Even if we meet the initial listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market, we cannot assure you that we will be able to comply with the other standards that we are required to meet in order to maintain a listing of our Common Stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market. If after listing we fail to satisfy the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market, such as the corporate governance requirements or the minimum stockholder’s equity requirement, the Nasdaq Capital Market may experience substantial dilution intake steps to de-list our Common Stock. Such a de-listing would likely have a negative effect on the price of our Common Stock and would impair our stockholders’ ability to sell or purchase our Common Stock when they wish to do so. In the event of a de-listing, we issue common stockwould take actions to restore our compliance with the Nasdaq Capital Market’s listing requirements, but we can provide no assurance that any action taken by us would result in our Common Stock becoming listed again, or that any such action would stabilize the future at amarket price below $4.00 per share.or improve the liquidity of our Common Stock.

The terms of the Series D Preferred Stock require us to increase the conversion rate in the event we issue common stock below $4.00 per share while any shares of Series D Preferred stock are outstanding, resulting in additional shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Series D Preferred Stock. For example, if we issue shares of common stock for little or no consideration, the certificate of designation for the Series D Preferred Stock provides that such issuance will be deemed to be issued at $0.001 per share of common stock, which would have a substantial impact on the conversion rate of the Series D Preferred Stock, and your ownership percentage of the Company and likely, its value, would decrease accordingly.

1415
 

Future financings through debt securities and preferred stock may restrict our operations.

If additional funds are raised through a credit facility or the issuance of debt securities or preferred stock, lenders under the credit facility or holders of these debt securities or preferred stock would likely have rights that are senior to the rights of holdersyou purchase shares of our common stock,Common Stock in this offering you will experience immediate and any credit facility or additional securities could contain covenants that would restrict our operations.substantial dilution in the book value per share of the Common Stock you purchase.

Our common stock price may be volatile and could fluctuate widely in price, which could result in substantial losses for investors.

The market price of our common stock has historically been and is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

·new products and services by us or our competitors;

·additions or departures of key personnel;

·intellectual property disputes;

·sales of our common stock;

·our ability to integrate operations, technology, products and services;

·our ability to execute our business plan;

·operating results below expectations;

·loss of any strategic relationship;

·industry developments;

·economic and other external factors; and

·period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results.

If our common stock becomes subject to the SEC’s penny stock rules, broker-dealers may experience difficulty in completing customer transactions and trading activity in our securities may be adversely affected.

Unless our securities are listed on a national securities exchange, or we have net tangible assets of $5.0 million or more and our common stock has a marketpublic offering price per share of $5.00 or more, transactions in our common stockCommon Stock will be subjectsubstantially higher than the net tangible book value per share of our Common Stock immediately prior to the SEC’s “penny stock” rules. If our common stock remains subjectoffering. After giving effect to the “penny stock” rules promulgated undersale of shares of our Common Stock at an assumed public offering price of $         per share and after deducting the Exchange Act, broker-dealers may find it difficultestimated underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by us, purchasers of our Common Stock in this offering will incur immediate dilution of $         per share in the net tangible book value of the Common Stock they acquire. For a further description of the dilution that investors in this offering will experience, see “Dilution.”

In addition, to effectuate customer transactions and trading activity in our securitiesthe extent that outstanding stock options have been or may be adversely affected.exercised or other shares issued, you may experience further dilution.

UnderSales of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock in the public market by our existing stockholders could cause our share price to fall.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that these rules, broker-dealers who recommend such securities to persons other than institutional accredited investors must:

·make a special written suitability determination for the purchaser;

·receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction prior to sale;

·provide the purchaser with risk disclosure documents which identify certain risks associated with investing in “penny stocks” and which describe the market for these “penny stocks” as well as a purchaser’s legal remedies; and

·obtain a signed and dated acknowledgment from the purchaser demonstrating that the purchaser has actually received the required risk disclosure document before a transaction in a “penny stock” can be completed.

As a result, if our common stock becomes or remains subject to the penny stock rules,sales might occur, could depress the market price of our securitiesCommon Stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. We are unable to predict the effect that sales may be depressed, and you may find it more difficult to sell shareshave on the prevailing market price of our common stock after conversion of shares of Series D PreferredCommon Stock.

We have not paid dividends on our common stock in the past and do not expect to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any return on investment may be limited to the value of our common stock.

No cash dividends have been paid on our common stock. We expect that any income received from operations will be devoted to our future operations and growth. We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the near future. Payment of dividends would depend upon our profitability at the time, cash available for those dividends, and other factors as our board of directors may consider relevant. If we do not pay dividends, our common stock may be less valuable because a return on an investor’s investment will only occur if our stock price appreciates. Investors in our common stock should not rely on an investment in our company if they require dividend income.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports about us, our business or our market, or if they adversely change their recommendations or publish negative reports regarding our stock adversely,business or our Common Stock, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stockCommon Stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may publish about us, our business, our market or our business.competitors. We do not currently have any control over these analysts and may never obtain research coverage by industrywe cannot provide any assurance that analysts will cover us or financial analysts.provide favorable coverage. If no or few analysts commence coverage of us, the trading price of our stock would likely decrease. Even if we do obtain analyst coverage, if one or moreany of the analysts who may cover us downgradeadversely change their recommendation regarding our stock,shares, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about our competitors, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of theseany analysts who may cover us were to cease coverage of our companythe Company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

A saleShares of our Common Stock are an illiquid investment as there is presently a substantial numberlimited market for our Common Stock. We do not know whether a market for our Common Stock will be sustained or what the trading price of our Common Stock will be and as a result it may be difficult for you to sell your shares of Common Stock.

There is presently a limited market for our Common Stock. Although we intend to list our Common Stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market, an active trading market for our Common Stock may not develop or be sustained. It may be difficult for you to sell your shares of Common Stock without depressing the market price for our Common Stock or at all. As a result of these and other factors, you may not be able to sell your shares of Common Stock at or above the offering price or at all. Further, an inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling our Common Stock and may impair our ability to enter into strategic partnerships or acquire companies, products, or services by using our equity securities as consideration.

Management will have broad discretion as to the use of the proceeds from this offering.

Our management will have broad discretion in the allocation of the net proceeds and could use them for purposes other than those contemplated at the time of this offering and as described in the section titled “Use of Proceeds.” You will be relying on the judgment of our management with regard to the use of these net proceeds, and you will not have the opportunity, as part of your investment decision, to assess whether the net proceeds are being used appropriately. The failure by our management to apply these funds effectively could result in financial losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, cause the price of our securities to decline and delay the development of our product candidates. Pending the application of these funds, we may invest the net proceeds from this offering in a manner that does not produce income or that loses value.

Because we do not intend to declare cash dividends on our shares of common stock in the foreseeable future, shareholders must rely on appreciation of the value of our common stock includingfor any return on their investment.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently anticipate that we will retain future earnings, if any, for the Resale Shares registered hereindevelopment, operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms of any existing or future debt agreements may causepreclude us from paying dividends. As a result, we expect that only appreciation of the price of our common stock, if any, will provide a return to decline and may impair our ability to raise capitalinvestors in this offering for the foreseeable future.

16

Our common stock is traded on the OTCBB and, despite certain increases of trading volume from time to time, there have been periods when it could be considered “thinly-traded”, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common stock at or near bid prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. Finance transactions resulting in a large amount of newly issued shares that become readily tradable, or other events that cause current stockholders to sell shares, could place downward pressure on the trading price of our stock. In addition, the lack of a robust resale market may require a stockholder who desires to sell a large number of shares of common stock to sell the shares in increments over time to mitigate any adverse impact of the sales on the market price of our stock.

If our stockholders sell, or the market perceives that our stockholders intend to sell for various reasons, including the ending of restrictions on resale of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, the market price of our common stock could fall. Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate. We may become involved in securities class action litigation that could divert management’s attention and harm our business.

The reverse stock split may decrease the liquidity of the shares of our common stock.

The liquidity of the shares of our common stock may be affected adversely by the recently effected 1-for-850 reverse stock split given the reduced number of shares outstanding following the reverse stock split, especially if the market price of our common stock does not increase as a result of the reverse stock split. In addition, the reverse stock split may have increased the number of stockholders who own odd lots (less than 100 shares) of our common stock, creating the potential for such stockholders to experience an increase in the cost of selling their shares and greater difficulty effecting such sales.

Following the reverse stock split, the resulting market price of our common stock may not attract new investors, including institutional investors, and may not satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. Consequently, the trading liquidity of our common stock may not improve.

Although we believe that a higher market price of our common stock may help generate greater or broader investor interest, there can be no assurance that the recently effected 1-for-850 reverse stock split will result in a share price that will attract new investors, including institutional investors. In addition, there can be no assurance that the market price of our common stock will satisfy the investing requirements of those investors. As a result, the trading liquidity of our common stock may not necessarily improve.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INDUSTRY DATA

This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Such forward-lookingAll statements include those that express plans, anticipation, intent, contingency, goals, targets or future development and/or otherwise are notother than statements of historical fact. Thesefacts contained in this prospectus are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this prospectus are only predictions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and they are subject to risksfinancial trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition and uncertainties known and unknown that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements.

of operations. In some cases, you can identify these forward-looking statements by terminology,terms such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “estimates”, “plans”, “potential”, “possible”, “probable”, “believes”, “seeks”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”“anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “depends,” “estimate,” “expects,” “intend,” “may,” “ongoing,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would” or the negative of suchthose terms or other similar expressions. Accordingly,expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain those words. We have based these forward-looking statements involve estimates, assumptionson our current expectations and uncertaintiesprojections about future events and trends that could cause actualwe believe may affect our financial condition, results to differ materially from those expressed in them. Anyof operations, strategy, short-term and long-term business operations and objectives and financial needs.

These forward-looking statements are qualifiedsubject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described in their entirety by reference to the factors discussed throughout this prospectus.

You should read this prospectus“Risk Factors.” Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and the documents that we reference herein and therein and have filed as exhibits to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is part, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is accurate as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus only. Because the risk factors referred to above could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Theserapidly changing environment. New risks and uncertainties, along with others, are described above under the heading “Risk Factors” beginning on page 8 of this prospectus. Further, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and ittime. It is not possible for usour management to predict which factors will arise. In addition,all risks, nor can we cannot assess the impact of each factorall factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements we may make. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this prospectus may not occur and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements.

You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that the future results, levels of activity, performance or events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur. Moreover, except as required by law, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. We qualify allundertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this prospectus to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.

You should read this prospectus and the information presenteddocuments that we reference in this prospectus and particularly our forward-looking statements, by these cautionary statements.

This prospectus also includes estimateshave filed with the SEC as exhibits to the registration statement of market size and industry data that we obtained from industry publications and surveys and internal company sources. The industry publications and surveys used by management to determine market size and industry data contained inwhich this prospectus have been obtainedis a part with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and events and circumstances may be materially different from sources believed to be reliable.what we expect.

PRICE RANGE

17

USE OF COMMON STOCKPROCEEDS

OurWe estimate that the net proceeds from our issuance and sale of            shares of common stock were cleared for trading under the symbol “TTWZ:OB” on the OTCBB on November 24, 2008, and later began trading on the OTCBB under the symbol “MSLP:OB” on April 22, 2010. Prior to this period, there was minimal trading in our common stock. The following table shows the reported high and low bid quotations per share for our common stock based on information provided by the OTCBB. These prices reflect the 1-for-850 reverse stock split of our common stock that we effected on November 26, 2012.

  High  Low 
2013        
First Quarter
 $11.55  $3.90 
Second Quarter  12.47   8.06 
         
2012        
Fourth Quarter  6.21   3.40 
Third Quarter  17.43   5.02 
Second Quarter  31.88   10.20 
First Quarter  31.03   5.10 
         
2011        
Fourth Quarter  22.10   5.95 
Third Quarter  33.15   11.90 
Second Quarter  68.85   21.25 
First Quarter  110.50   30.60 
         
2010        
Fourth Quarter  841.55   38.25 
Third Quarter  884.05   297.52 
Second Quarter (beginning April 22, 2010)  1,360.09   476.53 
First Quarter(1)  -   - 

(1)Prior to April 22, 2010, our common stock was not traded on the OTCBB or any other exchange.

Quotations onin this offering will be approximately $        (or approximately $         if the OTCBB reflect bid and ask quotations, may reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown or commission, and may not represent actual transactions. In periods prior to April 22, 2010, there was no volumeunderwriter will exercise its over-allotment option in our common stock. The closingfull), based upon an assumed public offering price of $        per share, which is based upon the last reported sale price of our common stock on July 9, 2013 was $10.85the OTC Pink on             , 2022, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us.

A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed public offering price of $       per share.share would increase or decrease the net proceeds from this offering by approximately $       million, assuming that the number of shares of common stock offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. An increase or decrease of in the number of shares of common stock offered by us would increase or decrease our net proceeds by approximately $       million, assuming the assumed public offering price remains the same, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

As of July 9, 2013, there were approximately 324 holders of recordWe currently expect to use the net proceeds from this offering for working capital, general corporate purposes and marketing and advertising our new energy line.

Changing circumstances may cause us to consume capital significantly faster than we currently anticipate. The amounts and timing of our common stock. This figure does not take into account those stockholders whose certificates are held in street name by brokers and other nominees. We estimate that such holders number approximately 3,700.

DIVIDEND POLICY

We have never declared dividends on our common stock, and currently do not plan to declare dividends on shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future. We expect to retain our future earnings, if any, for use in the operation and expansion of our business. Subject to the foregoing, the payment of cash dividends in the future, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors andactual expenditures will depend upon suchnumerous factors, including the progress of our global marketing and sales efforts, with development efforts, economic and political effects of COVID-19 and government responses to it, and the overall economic environment. Therefore, our management will retain broad discretion over the use of the proceeds from this offering. We may ultimately use the proceeds for different purposes than what we currently intend. Pending any ultimate use of any portion of the proceeds from this offering, if the anticipated proceeds will not be sufficient to fund all the proposed purposes, our management will determine the order of priority for using the proceeds, as earnings levels,well as the amount and sources of other funds needed.

Pending our use of the net proceeds from this offering, we may invest the net proceeds in a variety of capital requirements, our overall financial conditionpreservation investments, including short-term, investment grade, interest bearing instruments and any other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.U.S. government securities.

18
 

 

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth our capitalizationsummary historical consolidated financial data for the periods presented below. The summary consolidated financial data as of March 31, 2013:2022, has been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein.

Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for future periods. You should consider this tableread the following summary consolidated financial data in conjunction with “Description of Securities” and our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

  As of March 31, 2013 
    
  (unaudited) 
Stockholders’ equity $     
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding  -     
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, Series B Preferred Stock; 51 shares authorized, issued and outstanding  -    
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, 500 shares authorized, 0 and 0 issued  and  outstanding  -     
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, 1,600,000 authorized, issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 actual and 1,600,000 authorized, 1,500,000 and 323,875 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013  324    
Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 6,823,921 issuedand 6,774,000 outstanding at March  31, 2013 actual;  6,824     
Treasury Stock, at cost; 49,921 shares  (564,515)    
Additional paid-in capital  79,262,218     
Accumulated deficit  (71,471,457)    
Accumulated other comprehensive income  (6,068)    
Total stockholders’ equity $7,227,326    

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should be read together with our financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements reflecting our current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Industry Data” for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those discussed in our forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. All share amounts and per share amounts in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” reflectincluded elsewhere in this prospectus, as well as our latest Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the 1-for-850 reverse stock splitthree months ended March 31, 2022. See “Where You Can Find More Information.”

  (Unaudited) 
  Actual  As Adjusted  Pro Forma As Adjusted(1) 
Cash $534  $           
Accounts payable $18,877  $     
Accrued and other liabilities  6,654        
Obligation under secured borrowing arrangement  6,592        
Operating lease liability  233        
Senior notes payable  7,738        
Convertible notes with a related party  5,330        
Revolving line of credit, related party  2,747        
Total Current Liabilities  48,171        
Other long term liabilities  1,861        
Total Liabilities  50,032        
             
Stockholders’ deficit:            
Common stock, par value of $0.001 per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 33,386,200 and 33,386,200 shares issued as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively; and 33,386,200 and 33,386,200 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively  32        
Additional paid-in capital  183,792        
Treasury Stock at Cost, 875,621 shares  (10,039)      
Accumulated deficit  (211,840)      
Total Stockholders’ Deficit  (38,055)      
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit $11,977  $     

(1)The pro forma information above is illustrative only and will be further adjusted based on the actual public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing.

19

Each $      increase or decrease in the assumed public offering price of $     per share would increase or decrease, as applicable, our cash, additional paid-in capital, total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization by approximately $         , assuming that the number of shares offered by us remains the same, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Each increase or decrease of           shares to the shares offered by us in the offering would increase or decrease the amount of our cash and total stockholders’ equity by approximately $       , assuming a public offering price of $       per share, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

The number of shares of common stock that we effectedto be outstanding immediately after this offering is based on November 26, 2012.34,348,891 shares of common stock outstanding as of May 10, 2022 and excludes:

17,355,700 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in the October 2021 private placement at exercise price of $0.78 per share;

5,399,441 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options to purchase shares of common stock;

16,154,795 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding convertible notes; and

171,703 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options to purchase shares of common stock under our 2015 Incentive Compensation Plan at a weighted average exercise price of $1.89.

1,811,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options to purchase shares of common stock under our 2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan at a weighted average exercise price of $0.40.

PlanImmediately following the effectiveness of Operation

We develop market and sell athlete-focused, high quality nutritional supplements primarily to specialty resellers. Our propriety and award winning products address active lifestyles including muscle building, weight loss, and maintaining general fitness throughthe registration statement of which this prospectus forms a daily nutritional supplement regimen. Our products are available in over 10,500 U.S. retail outlets, including Dick’s Sporting Goods, GNC, Vitamin Shoppe and Vitamin World. We also sell our products in over 100 online channels, including bodybuilding.com, amazon.com, gnc.com and vitacost.com. Internationally, our nutritional supplements are sold in approximately 90 countries, andpart, we expect that international salesto effect the Reverse Stock Split. No fractional shares of the Company’s common stock will be issued as a significant partresult of our sales for the foreseeable future.Reverse Stock Split. Any fractional shares resulting from the Reverse Stock Split will be rounded up to the nearest whole share.

Our primary growth strategy is to:Unless otherwise stated, all information in this prospectus assumes:

(1)increase our product distribution and sales through increased market penetrations both domestically and internationally;no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option to purchase additional shares;

(2)increase our margins by focusing on streamlining our operationsno exercise of the warrants to be issued to the representative of the underwriters in connection with this offering as described in the “Underwriting — Representative’s Warrants” section of this prospectus; and seeking operating efficiencies in all areas of our operations;

(3)continue to conduct additional testingthe completion of the safetyReverse Stock Split, that is expected to occur immediately following the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Unless otherwise noted and efficacyother than in our financial statements and the notes thereto, the share and per share information in this prospectus reflects a proposed reverse stock split of our productsthe outstanding common stock and formulate new products; andpreferred stock at an assumed 1-for-  ratio to occur immediately following the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

(4)increase awareness of our products by increasing our marketing and branding opportunities through endorsements, sponsorships and brand extensions.

Our core marketing strategy is to brand MusclePharm as the “must have” fitness brand for workout enthusiasts and elite athletes. We seek to be known as The Athletes Company®, run by athletes who create their products for other athletes both professional and otherwise. We believe that our marketing mix of endorsers, sponsorships and providing sample products for our retail resellers to use is an optimal strategy to increase sales.

Results of Operations

Year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011.

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2012  2011 
       
Sales – net $67,055,215  $17,212,636 
Cost of sales  52,726,934   14,845,069 
Gross profit  14,328,281   2,367,567 
General and administrative expenses  23,064,092   18,587,727 
Loss from operations  (8,735,811)  (16,220,160)
Other expense  (10,216,984)  (7,060,790)
Net loss  (18,952,795)  (23,280,950)
Net loss per share – basic and diluted $(13.00) $(70.30)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period – basic and diluted  1,458,757   331,158 

20
 

RevenuesMARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Market and Other Information

This prospectus contains estimates and other statistical data made by independent parties and by us relating to market size and growth and other data about our industry. We obtained the industry and market data in this prospectus from our own research as well as from industry and general publications, surveys and studies conducted by third parties. This data involves a number of assumptions and limitations and contains projections and estimates of the future performance of the industries in which we operate that are subject to a high degree of uncertainty, including those discussed in “Risk Factors.” We caution you not to give undue weight to such projections, assumptions and estimates. Further, industry and general publications, studies and surveys generally state that they have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, although they do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information. While we believe that these publications, studies and surveys are reliable, we have not independently verified the data contained in them. In addition, while we believe that the results and estimates from our internal research are reliable, such results and estimates have not been verified by any independent source.

Listing

Our net revenues increased 290%common stock is quoted on the OTC Pink Tier, an automated quotation service operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. under the symbol “MSLP.” Our transfer agent is EQ Shareowner Services, which is located at 1110 Center Point Curve, Suite 101, Mendota Heights, MN 55120.

We have applied to list our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “MSLP”.

Immediately following the offering, we expect to have one class of common stock outstanding. As of March 31, 2022, there were approximately $67.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to approximately $17.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Sales during the year ended December 31, 2012 increased due to increased awareness334 registered holders of record of our product brand. We have focused on an aggressive marketing plan to penetratecommon stock, and the market, as such, significant expenditures related to advertising and promotions have been experienced. The sales increase was also the result of capital spent on marketing and brand recognition with distributors along with endorsements and sponsorships. The Company’s many efforts for growth included hiring new managers, additional sales and marketing staff, along with adding new products in an effort to continue to expand our customer base. Another growth area was sales in the international markets. International sales are included in the results of operations and increased approximately $16.2 million or 405% to $20.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 Overall as a direct result of our aggressive marketing plan, our products are currently being offered in more retail stores, both domestically and internationally, receiving better shelf placement, and receiving recognized awards compared to the prior period. The Company has an exclusive marketing arrangement with the UFC, Ultimate Fighting Championships, which has called out MusclePharm as the Supplement of Choice for the UFC and at the 2012 Bodybuilding.com Supplement Awards, we received three Awards of Excellence; (i) the “Brand of the Year” award, (ii) the “Packaging of the Year” award, and (iii) the “Pre-Workout Supplement of the Year” award for AssaultTM .

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2012 was approximately $14.3 million or 21% of revenue, compared to approximately $2.4 million or 14% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily due to the reduction to discounts as a percentage of sales and favorable terms for manufacturing improvements in product pricing. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the discounts and allowances as a percentage of sales was 14% compared to the year ended December 31, 2011 which was 19%. We expect our focus on streamlining operations will increase our operating efficiencies and will further improve our gross profit percentage.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased to $23.1 million, compared to $18.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Our 290% sales growth necessitated substantial increases in our general and administrative expenses and included $2.2 million in advertising and promotions and $2.4 million in sponsorship and endorsements all used to promote brand and product awareness. We expect as we continue to promote our brand and products, these areas and levels of promotion will hold steady or increase relative to overall efforts to increase product awareness and sales. Salaries and benefits, excluding executive bonuses, also increased by $1.3 million; however, these were approximately 5% of sales for 2012 compared to approximately 11% of sales in the 2011 period.

Increases in investment advisory and legal fees of $3.1 million were a result of efforts required to obtain financing and dispute resolutions along with two consulting contracts that require us to issue 8.4%last reported sale price of our common stock on the OTCPink was $       per share on                  , 2022 ($       giving effect to an ongoing, fully diluted basis.assumed Reverse Stock Split of 1-for-    , which is expected to occur immediately following the effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part). OTCPink does not constitute an established public trading market. Over-the-counter market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

The increase in all other general administrative areas of $4.3 million along with significant items listed above, were partially offset by the decrease in stock based compensation of approximately $8.6 million.

The following table provides an overview of expense categories and percentage of net revenue:

  2012($)  % of Revenue  2011($)  % of Revenue 
Advertising Expense $8,430,401   12.6% $5,241,585   30.5%
Operating Expense  5,512,197   8.2%  5,277,500   30.7%
Professional & R&D Expense  4,524,964   6.7%  888,695   5.1%
Salary and Wage Expense  4,596,530   6.9%  7,179,947   41.7%
Total G&A Expense $23,064,092   34.4% $18,587,727   108%

Operating Loss

Operating loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 was approximately $8.7 million, compared to approximately $16.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

21
 

Interest ExpenseDILUTION

Interest expense forIf you invest in our common stock, your ownership interest will be diluted to the year ended Decemberextent of the difference between the initial public offering price per share of our common stock and the as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after this offering.

As of March 31, 20122022, we had a historical net tangible book (deficit) of $         , or $         per share of common stock, based on 33,386,200 shares of common stock outstanding at March 31, 2022. Our historical net tangible book value per share is the amount of our total tangible assets less our total liabilities at March 31, 2022, divided by the number of shares of common stock outstanding at March 31, 2022.

After giving effect to the issuance in         of         , our pro forma net tangible book value (deficit) as of March 31, 2022 was approximately $7.3 million,$         , or $         per share of common stock.

After giving further effect to the sale of             shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $         per share, which is based upon the last reported sale price of our Common Stock on the OTC Pink on                , 2022, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our pro forma as compared to approximately $3.7 million for the year ended Decemberadjusted net tangible book value per share as of March 31, 2011. The2022 was $         , or $         per share of common stock. This represents an immediate increase in interest expense primarily relates to increased interest on debtpro forma as adjusted net tangible book value of $0.6 million, increased amortization of debt issuance costs of $0.1 million and increased amortization of debt discounts of $2.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Other Expense

Other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 were approximately $10.2 million, compared to approximately $7.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, an increase of 44.7%. The components of our other expense are as follows:

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2012  2011 
Derivative expense $(4,409,214) $(4,777,654)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  5,899,968   5,162,100 
Loss on settlement of accounts payable, debt and conversion of Series C preferred stock (2012 only)  (4,447,732)  (3,862,458)
Interest expense  (7,335,070)  (3,711,278)
Foreign currency transaction gain  15,030   - 
Licensing income  10,000   250,000 
Other income (expense)  50,034   (121,500)
  $(10,216,984) $(7,060,790)

Net Loss

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 was approximately $19 million, or $(13.00)$         per share compared to the net lossexisting stockholders and immediate dilution of approximately $23.3 million or $(70.30)$         per share for the year ended December 31, 2011. Inflation did not have a material impact on our operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.to new investors purchasing shares of common stock in this offering.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table summarizes total current assets, liabilitiesillustrates this dilution on a per share basis:

Assumed public offering price per share$
Historical net tangible book value per share as of March 31, 2022$
Pro forma increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to new investors
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share immediately after this offering$
Dilution per share to new investors in this offering$

The information discussed above is illustrative only, and working deficit at December 31, 2012, compared to December 31, 2011:

  At December
31, 2012
  At December
31, 2011
  Increase/(Decrease) 
             
Current Assets $4,949,881  $4,016,833  $933,048 
Current Liabilities  16,520,456   17,710,100   (1,189,644)
Working Deficit $(11,570,575) $(13,693,267) $(2,122,692)

Our primary source of operating cash has been from the sale of equity,dilution information following this offering will be adjusted based on the issuance of convertible secured promissory notesactual public offering price and other short-term debtterms of this offering determined at pricing. A $          increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $          per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase (decrease) our pro forma as discussed below.

Company’s management believes that with increased sales expansionadjusted net tangible book value after this offering to $          per share and the openingdilution to new investors purchasing common stock in this offering to $          per share, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the Franklin, Tennessee distribution center, there willcover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. An increase of            shares in the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, would increase our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value after this offering to $          per share and decrease the dilution to new investors purchasing common stock in this offering to $          per share, assuming no change in the assumed initial public offering price per share and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. A decrease of              shares in the number of shares offered by us would decrease the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value after this offering to $          per share and increase the dilution to new investors purchasing common stock in this offering to $          per share, assuming no change in the assumed initial public offering price per share and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.

If the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares in full, the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after giving effect to the offering would be opportunities$          per share. This represents an increase in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value of $          per share to increase sales; however, the Company may needexisting stockholders and dilution in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value of $          per share to continue to raise capital in order execute the business plan, which includes buying more inventory and broadening the sales platform. There can be no assurance that such capital will be available on acceptable terms or at all.new investors.

On December 4, 2012, we entered into a $1.0 million bridge loan to provide us with short-term financing.  In connection with the bridge loan, we entered into a subscription agreement with six subscribers pursuant to which we issued an aggregate

22

The number of $1.0 million principal amount of promissory notes and 50,000 shares of common stock to the subscribers.  The promissory notes were repaid in January 2013.  Additionally, we granted the subscribers “piggy-back” registration rights for thebe outstanding immediately after this offering is based on 34,348,891 shares of common stock outstanding as of May 10, 2022 and excludes:

17,355,700 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants issued in the October 2021 private placement at exercise price of $0.78 per share;

5,399,441 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options to purchase shares of common stock;

16,154,795 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of outstanding convertible notes; and

171,703 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options to purchase shares of common stock under our 2015 Incentive Compensation Plan at a weighted average exercise price of $1.89.

1,811,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options to purchase shares of common stock under our 2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan at a weighted average exercise price of $0.40.

The table above assumes no exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option in certain circumstances.this offering. If the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised in full, the number of common shares held by new investors purchasing common stock in this offering would be increased to % of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding after this offering, and the number of shares held by existing stockholders would be reduced to        % of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding after this offering.

At December 31, 2012,To the extent that stock options or warrants are exercised, we had cash of $0 and a working capital deficit of approximately $11.6 million, compared to cash of approximately $0.7 million and a working capital deficit of approximately $13.7 million at December 31, 2011. The working capital deficit decrease of approximately $2.1 million was primarily due to a net decrease in derivative liabilities of approximately $7.0 million, an increase in accounts receivable of approximately $.7 million, offset by an increase in customer deposits of approximately $0.3 million, an increaseissue new stock options under our equity incentive plan, or we issue additional common stock in the current portionfuture, there will be further dilution to investors participating in this offering. In addition, if we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of approximately $3.2 millionthese securities could result in further dilution to our stockholders.

23

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULT OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and an increaseresults of operations in accounts payableconjunction with financial statements and accrued liabilities of approximately $2.4million.

Cash used in operating activities was approximately $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared to cash used in operating activities of approximately $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease in cash used in operating activities of approximately $5.1 million was primarily due to a decrease in net loss of approximately $4.3 million, an increased payables and customer deposits of approximately $4.3 million, an increase in depreciation and amortization of approximately $0.3 million, a decrease in accounts receivable of approximately $1.5 million and an increase in amortization expense of approximately $2.3 offset by a decrease in stock and warrants issued for services of approximately $3.4 million, a decrease in losses related to repayments and conversions of debt of approximately $0.6 million, a decrease in derivative expense and fair value changes of approximately $1.1 million and a increases in prepaids, inventory, and other assets of approximately $1.2 million.

Cash used in investing activities increased to $965,327 from $831,511 for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, due to slightly higher spending on fixed assets. Future investments in property and equipment,notes thereto, as well as further developmentthe “Risk Factors” and “Description of Business” sections included elsewhere in this prospectus. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this prospectus, particularly in “Risk Factors”.

Overview

MusclePharm is a scientifically-driven, performance lifestyle company that develops, manufactures, markets and distributes branded sports nutrition products and nutritional supplements. We offer a broad range of performance powders, capsules, tablets, gels and on-the-go ready to eat snacks that satisfy the needs of enthusiasts and professionals alike. Our portfolio of recognized brands, MusclePharm and FitMiss, is marketed and sold to over 100 countries globally.

Our offerings are clinically developed through a six-stage research process, and all of our Internet presencemanufactured products are rigorously vetted for banned substances by the leading quality assurance program, Informed-Choice. While we initially drove growth in the Specialty retail channel, in recent years we have expanded our focus to drive sales and retailer growth across leading e-commerce, Food Drug & Mass (“FDM”), Specialty and International channels.

  For the Months Ended March 31, 
  2022  % of Total  2021  % of Total 
Distribution Channel                
Specialty $3,383   26% $6,795   52%
International $733   6%  3,847   29%
FDM $8,985   68% $2,479   19%
Total $13,101   100% $13,121   100%

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) and have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business.

Our results of operations are affected by economic conditions, including macroeconomic conditions and levels of business confidence. There continues to be significant volatility and economic uncertainty in many markets and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has increased that level of volatility and uncertainty and has created economic disruption. We are actively managing our business to respond to the impact. There were no adjustments recorded in the financial statements that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

COVID-19

The worldwide spread of COVID-19, including the emergence of variants, has resulted, and may continue to result in a global slowdown of economic activity, which may decrease demand for a broad variety of goods and services, while also disrupting supply channels, sales channels and advertising and marketing activities for an unknown period of time until the COVID-19 pandemic is contained, or economic activity normalizes. With the current uncertainty in economic activity, the impact on our revenue and results of operations is likely to continue and the size and duration of the impact we are currently unable to accurately predict. The extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operational and financial performance will largely depend on available capital resources.a variety of factors, including the duration and spread of COVID-19 and its variants, and its impact on our customers, contract manufacturers, vendors, industry and employees, all of which are uncertain at this time and cannot be accurately predicted. See “Item 1.A Risk Factors” for further discussion of the adverse impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business.

Cash flows provided by financing activities were approximately $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared

24

Factors Affecting Our Performance

As we continue to cash flows provided by financing activitiesexecute our growth strategy and focus on our core products, we believe that we can, over time, continue to improve our operating margins and expense structure. In addition, we have implemented plans focused on cost containment, customer profitability, product and pricing controls that we believe will improve our gross margin and reduce our losses.

We expect that our advertising and promotion expense will continue to decrease as we focus on reducing our expenses and shifting our promotional costs, in part, from general branding and product awareness to acquiring customers and driving sales from existing customers. We expect that our discounts and allowances will continue to decrease, both overall and as a percentage of approximately $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The approximately $6.2 million decrease was due to primarily to the approximately $5.8 millionrevenue, as we further reduce certain discretionary promotional activity that does not result in repayment of debt and approximately $0.5 million for the purchase of treasury stock offset by ana commensurate increase in proceeds from issuance of debt of approximately $0.8 million offset by an increase in proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants of approximately $0.7 million.revenues.

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2012  2011 
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:        
Proceeds from issuance of debt $5,823,950  $6,612,900 
Repayment of debt  (5,847,575)  (75,285)
Debt issuance costs  (234,450)  (263,283)
Repurchase of common stock  (460,978)  - 
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock  -   100,000 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants – net of recapitalization payment  1,660,760   875,000 
Cash overdraft  69,370   - 
Net Cash (Used In) Provided By Financing Activities $1,011,077  $7,249,332 

Results of Operations

ForComparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 20132022 to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2021:

The following table sets forth certain financial information from our consolidated statements of operations along with a percentage of net revenue and 2012 (unaudited):should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes (in thousands).

  Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
  2013  2012 
       
Sales - gross $24,924,036  $19,302,769 
Discounts and sales allowances  (2,362,869)  (2,742,089)
Sales - net  22,561,167   16,560,680 
Cost of sales  14,396,406   12,895,162 
Gross profit  8,164,761   3,665,518 
General and administrative expenses  8,886,241   4,392,811 
Loss from operations  (721,480)  (727,293)
Other income (expenses) - net  (6,640,501)  (15,308,000)
Net Loss $(7,361,981) $(16,035,293)
Net loss per share - basic and diluted $(1.78) $(11.23)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period – basic and diluted  4,128,679   1,428,024 
  For the Months Ended March 31, 
  2022  2021 
  Amount  % of Revenue  Amount  % of Revenue 
Revenue, net $13,101   100% $13,121   100%
Cost of revenue  11,592   88%  9,432   72%
Gross profit  1,509   12%  3,689   28%
Operating expenses:                
Selling and promotion  1,160   9%  1,149   9%
General and administration  2,829   22%  2,268   17%
Total operating expenses  3,989   30%  3,417   26%
Income (loss) from operations  (2,480)  -19%  272   2%
Other (expense) income:                
Gain on settlements  12   0%  200   2%
Interest expense  (3,821)  -29%  (510)  -4%
Other (expense) income, net  (12)  0%  132   1%
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes  (6,301)  -48%  94   1%
Net income (loss) $(6,301)  -48% $94   1%

25

Revenue, net

We derive our revenue through the sales of our various branded sports nutrition products, nutritional supplements and energy drinks. Revenue is recognized when control of a promised good is transferred to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for the good. This usually occurs when finished goods are delivered to the Company’s customers or when finished goods are picked up by a customer’s carrier.

Net revenue reflects the transaction prices for contracts, which includes goods shipped at selling list prices reduced by discounts and sales allowances. We record discounts and sales allowances as a direct reduction of revenue for various discounts provided to our customers, consisting primarily of promotional related credits. Sales - grossdiscounts are a significant part of our marketing plan to our customers as they help drive increased sales and brand awareness with end users through promotions that we support through our distributors and re-sellers.

Gross sales increased approximately $5.6 million or 29% to $24,924,000 forFor the three months ended March 31, 2013,2022, our net revenues were approximately $13.1 million compared to $19,303,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in sales was due primarily to increased awareness of our product brand, combined with hiring additional sales and marketing staff, and adding new products in an effort to expand our customer base. Since inception, we have focused on an aggressive marketing plan to penetrate the market. As such, significant promotional expenditures have been made to increase product sales through adding new customers and expanding our product line.

Overall as a direct result of our aggressive marketing plan, our products are currently being offered in more retail stores, both domestically and internationally, receiving better shelf placement, and receiving recognized awards compared to the prior period. At the 2012 Bodybuilding.com Supplement Awards, we received three Awards of Excellence; (i) the “Brand of the Year” award, (ii) the “Packaging of the Year” award, and (iii) the “Pre-Workout Supplement of the Year” award for AssaultTM , and MusclePharm remains the product of choice for the Ultimate Fighting Championship, UFC.

Discounts and sales allowances

Discounts and sales allowances for the three months ended March 31, 2013 decreased to approximately $2,363,000 as compared to $2,742,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. This decrease is driven by the continued efforts to place controls around this area and greater efforts to define customer terms and allowances.

Other Income (Expenses)

Other expenses were $6,641,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to the $15,308,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company issued warrants to convert 1,500,000 shares of preferred stock into 3,000,000 shares of common stock. Refer to Note 5 for further detail of costs related to derivative agreements.

  Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
  2013  2012 
       
Derivative expense $(96,913) $(1,456,910)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities $(6,044,643) $(8,357,171)
Gain (loss) on settlement of accounts payable and debt $276,985  $(2,941,826)
Interest expense $(780,320) $(2,570,516)
Other income $4,390  $18,423 
  $(6,640,501) $(15,308,000)

Net Loss

For the foregoing reasons, we had a net loss of approximately $7,362,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to approximately $16,036,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Inflation did not have a material impact on our operations for the period. Other than the foregoing, management knows of no trends, demands, or uncertainties that are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our results of operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table summarizes total current assets, liabilities and working capital at March 31, 2013, compared to December 31, 2012.

  March 31, 2013  December 31,
2012
  Increase/Decrease 
Current Assets $18,982,167  $4,949,881  $14,032,286 
Current Liabilities $13,309,425  $16,520,456  $(3,211,031)
Working Capital (Deficit) $5,672,742  $(11,570,575) $17,243,317 

Our primary source of operating cash has been through the sale of equity and through the issuance of convertible secured promissory notes and other short-term debt as discussed below.

On March 27, 2013, MusclePharm sold an aggregate of 703,236 shares of its common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”) at a per share price of $8.50 in a private placement (the “Private Placement”) to certain accredited investors (the “Purchasers”) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $5,977,506, thereby providing working capital.

The Common Stock was sold pursuant to subscription agreements dated March 27, 2013 (the “Subscription Agreements”) between the Company and the Purchasers. The Subscription Agreements contained customary terms regarding, among other things, representations and warranties and indemnification.

At March 31, 2013, we had cash of $8,483,000 and working capital of approximately $5,673,000, compared to cash of $0 and a working capital deficit of approximately $11,571,000 at December 31, 2012. The working capital increase of approximately $17,243,000 was primarily due to a net increase in cash of $8,493,000, an increase in accounts receivable of $4,726,000 and a decrease in current portion of debt of $4,008,000.

Cash used in operating activities was $3,206,969 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to cash provided by operating activities of $1,423,375 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in cash used in operating activities of approximately $4.6$13.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to2021, a decline of approximately $20,000 or 0%. Net revenue for the energy segment was up $1 million, primarily driven by volume, while net revenue for the protein products segment was down $1 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, was primarily due2022, the Company had three customers who individually accounted for 59%, 13% and 12% of our net revenue. During the three months ended March 31, 2021, the Company had three customers who individually accounted for 28%, 17% and 14% of our net revenue. During the 1st Quarter of 2022 the Company instituted a price increase with select customers, contributing to a decrease in payables and customer deposits7.4 % of approximately $2.5 million, a decrease in depreciation and amortization of approximately $2 million, an increase in accounts receivable of approximately $2.5 million, a decrease in loss on settlement of accounts payable of approximately $3.2 million and a decrease in derivative expense and change in fair value of derivatives of approximately $3.7 million offset by a decrease net loss of approximately $8.7 million.

Cash used in investing activities decreased to $234,573 from $305,781revenue for the three months ended March 31, 20132022.

Discounts and 2012, duesales allowances declined to slightly lower spending on fixed assets. Future investments in property and equipment, as well as further developmentapproximately 11% of our Internet presence will largely depend on available capital resources.

Cash flows provided by financing activities were $11,922,620gross revenue, or $1.6 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2013,2022, compared to cash flows used in financing activitiesapproximately 15% of $478,123gross revenue, or $2.4 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2012.2021. Discounts and sales allowances fluctuate based on customer mix and changes in discretionary promotional activity. We continue to monitor our discounts and allowances, reducing where practical to continue to meet our gross margin expectation.

Cost of Revenue and Gross Profit

Cost of revenue for our products is related to the production, manufacturing, and freight-in of the related products purchased from third-party manufacturers. We primarily use contract manufacturers to drop ship products directly to our customers.

We experienced cost increases for raw materials during the three months ended March 31, 2022 primarily due to industry shortages in supply and consistent with market demand. Compared to the prior year, commodity protein costs have increased 90% negatively affecting our gross margin. We are taking steps to manage the increase and shortages by entering into agreements with additional protein brokers to diversify our protein sources, along with working with new vendors to source other component such as tubs, trays and bags.

We have focused on cost containment and improving gross margins by concentrating on customers with higher margins, reducing product discounts and promotional activity, along with reducing the number of SKU’s and negotiating improved pricing for raw materials. With recent increases in commodity prices, our gross margins have eroded and will continue to be impacted.

We are focusing on growing the energy segment which contributed to two points of margin in the three months ended March 31, 2022.

26

Selling and promotion

Our selling and promotion expense consists primarily of expenses related to freight-out, print and online advertising, club demonstrations, and stock-based compensation. Historically, advertising and promotions were a large part of both our growth strategy and brand awareness, in particular strategic partnerships with sports athletes and fitness enthusiasts and endorsements, licensing, and co-branding agreements. Additionally, we co-developed products with sports athletes and teams. In connection with our restructuring plan, we terminated most of these contracts in a strategic shift away from such costly arrangements and moved toward digital advertising, ambassador programs and sampling promotional materials.

For the three months ended March 31, 2022, our selling and promotion expenses were approximately $1.2 million compared to $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021, an increase of $11,000 or 1%. The increase was primarily related to an increase in freight-out and stock-based compensation related to our Energy business and offset by decreases in Club Demonstrations. Freight out is up $77,000 or 11% and Stock based compensation is up $142,000 or 100%. Club demonstrations were down $222,000 or 75%. All other selling and promotion expenses represent an increase of $14,000.

General and Administrative

Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits, professional fees, depreciation and amortization, research and development, information technology equipment and network costs, facilities related expenses, directors’ fees, legal fees, accounting and audit fees, consulting fees, stock-based compensation, investor relations costs, insurance, bad debt and other corporate expenses.

For the three months ended March 31, 2022, our general and administrative expenses were approximately $12.4$2.8 million compared $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021, or an increase of approximately $561,000 or 25%. This was due to primarily to the netan increase of approximately $16.1 million net proceeds from equity offeringsin professional fees associated with accounting fees, an increase in salaries and a decrease of approximately $0.1 million in repurchases of shares, offset by a decrease of approximately $2.8 million in proceeds from issuance of debtbenefits associated with stock-based compensation and an increase in bad debt repaymentexpense, offset by a reduction in office and IT expenses. Professional fees are up $213,000 or 41%, salaries and benefits are up $176,000 or 17%, and bad debt expense is up $344,000 or 3100% and office/IT expenses are down $96,000 or 39%. All other general and administrative expenses represent a decrease of $76,000.

Gain on Settlements

For the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, gain on settlements was $12,000 and $200,000 respectively.

Interest Expense

For the three months ended March 31, 2022, interest expense was approximately $1 million.$3.8 million compared to $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021, or an increase of $3.3 million or 645%.

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:Interest expense increased primarily due to the $3.2 million amortization of stock warrants associated with the issuance of the Senior Secured debt offering during the year ended December 31, 2021.

 Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
  2013  2012 
       
Proceeds from issuance of debt $-  $2,842,950 
Repayment of debt  (4,390,386)  (3,346,433)
Debt issuance costs  -   (30,000)
Repurchase of common stock  (103,537)  (230,400)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants  5,977,499   285,760 
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock  12,000,000   - 
Stock issuance costs  (1,560,956)  - 
Net Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities $11,922,620  $(478,123)

Off-Balance Sheet ArrangementsOther (Expense) Income, Net

Other thanFor the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, other expense was $12,000, compared to other income of $132,000 respectively.

Provision for Income Taxes

For the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, tax expense was zero. Our provision for income taxes consists primarily of federal and state income taxes in the U.S. and income taxes in foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct business. Due to uncertainty, as to the realization of benefits from our deferred tax assets, including net operating leases, asloss carryforwards, research and development and other tax credits, we have a full valuation allowance reserved against such assets. We expect to maintain this full valuation allowance at least in the near term.

27

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have incurred significant losses and experienced negative cash flows since inception. As of March 31, 2013,2022, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements. We are obligated under an operating lease forhad cash of $0.5 million, a decline of $0.7 million from the rentalDecember 31, 2021 balance of office space. Future minimum rental commitments with a remaining term in excess of one year as$1.2 million. As of March 31, 20132022, we had a working capital deficit of $36.3 million, a stockholders’ deficit of $38.1 million and an accumulated deficit of $211.8 million resulting from recurring losses from operations. As a result of our history of losses and financial condition, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon us generating profitable operations in the future and/or obtaining the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. We are evaluating different strategies to obtain financing to fund our expenses and achieve a level of revenue adequate to support our current cost structure. Financing strategies may include, but are not limited to, issuances of capital stock, debt borrowings, partnerships and/or collaborations.

We have funded our operations from proceeds from the sale of equity and debt securities. We will require significant additional capital to make the investments we need to execute our longer-term business plan. Our ability to successfully raise sufficient funds through the sale of debt or equity securities when needed is subject to many risks and uncertainties and, even if it were successful, future equity issuances would result in dilution to our existing shareholders and future debt securities may contain covenants that limit our operations or ability to enter into certain transactions.

We will need to raise additional funding through strategic relationships, public or private equity or debt financings, grants or other arrangements to develop and seek regulatory approvals for our existing and new product candidates. If such funding is not available, or not available on terms acceptable to us, our current development plan and plans for expansion of our general and administrative infrastructure may be curtailed.

Cash Flows

A summary of our cash flows is as follows (in thousands):

  For the Months Ended March 31, 
  2022  2021 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data:      
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities $(3,582) $98 
Net cash used in investing activities  -   (4)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  2,893   (1,505)
Net change in cash $(689) $(1,411)

Net Cash Operating Activities

Our net cash used in operating activities was $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021. The primary drivers include a $6.1 million net loss, and an increase in accounts receivable, net of $2.5 million.

Net Cash Investing Activities

Our net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2022, was zero compared to net cash used in investing activities of $0.004 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021.

28

Net Cash Financing Activities

Our net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2022, was $2.9 million compared to net cash used by financing activities of $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2021.

Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA

In addition to disclosing financial results calculated in accordance with GAAP, this prospectus discloses Adjusted EBITDA, which is net loss adjusted for stock-based compensation, (gain) on settlement of accounts payable, interest expense, depreciation of property and equipment, amortization of intangible assets, and (gain) or loss on foreign currency.

Management uses Adjusted EBITDA as a supplement to GAAP measures to further evaluate period-to-period operating performance, as well as the Company’s ability to meet future working capital requirements. Management believes this non-GAAP measures will provide investors with important additional perspectives in evaluating the Company’s ongoing business performance.

The GAAP measure most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA is net income (loss). The non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss). Adjusted EBITDA is not a presentation made in accordance with GAAP and has important limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because Adjusted EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items that affect net income (loss) and is defined differently by different companies, our definition of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.

Set forth below are reconciliations of our reported GAAP net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):

  For the Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2022  2021 
Net income (loss) (GAAP) $(6,301) $94 
Non-GAAP adjustments:        
Gain on settlements  (12)  (200)
Stock compensation expense  437   - 
Interest expense  3,821   512 
Depreciation of Property and Equipment  1   3 
Amortization of Intangible Assets  35   80 
(Gain) loss from foreign currency  12   (11)
Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP) $(2,007) $478 

29

Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared with the Year Ended December 31, 2020

The following table sets forth certain financial information from our consolidated statements of operations along with a percentage of net revenue and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes (in thousands).

  For the Years Ended December 31 
  2021  2020 
  Amount  % of Revenue  Amount  % of Revenue 
Revenue, net $50,042   100% $64,440   100%
Cost of revenue  44,671   89%  44,831   70%
Gross profit  5,371   11%  19,609   30%
Operating expenses:                
General and administration  9,891   20%  12,952   20%
Selling and promotion  4,393   9%  3,888   6%
Impairment of intangible assets  -   -   167   - 
Total operating expenses  14,284   29%  17,007   26%
Income (loss) from operations  (8,913)  -18%  2,602   4%
Other (expense) income:                
Interest expense  (5,460)  -11%  (1,493)  -2%
Loss on settlement of obligations  (2)  -   (95)  - 
Other income, net  1,501   3%  465   1%
Gain on settlement of payables  -   -   1,687   3%
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes  (12,874)  -26%  3,166   5%
Benefit for income taxes  (8)  -0%  (19)  -0%
Net income (loss) $(12,866)  -26% $3,185   5%

Revenue, net

We derive our revenue through the sales of our various branded sports nutrition products and nutritional supplements. Revenue is recognized when control of a promised good is transferred to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for the good. This usually occurs when finished goods are delivered to the Company’s customers or when finished goods are picked up by a customer or a customer’s carrier.

Net revenue reflects the transaction prices for contracts, which includes goods shipped at selling list prices reduced by variable consideration. We record sales incentives as a direct reduction of revenue for various discounts provided to our customers, consisting primarily of promotional related credits. Sales discounts are a significant part of our marketing plan to our customers as they help drive increased sales and brand awareness with end users through promotions that we support through our distributors and re-sellers.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, our net revenues were approximately $50.0 million compared to $64.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, a decline of approximately $14.4 million or 22%. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company had three customers who individually accounted for 38%, 14% and 13% of our net revenue. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company had three customers who individually accounted for 41%, 17% and 12% of our net revenue.

30

Discounts and sales allowances declined to approximately 16% of gross revenue, or $9.3 million, for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to approximately 22% of gross revenue, or $17.7 million, for the year ended December 31, 2020. Discounts and sales allowances fluctuate based on customer mix and changes in discretionary promotional activity. We continue to monitor our discounts and allowances, reducing where practical to continue to meet our gross margin expectations.

Net revenue decreased primarily due to industry wide supply shortages on protein and components, which delayed production of our products. During the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company instituted price increases of approximately 7.4% with select customers, contributing an additional $0.2 million net revenue.

Cost of Revenue and Gross Profit

Cost of revenue for our products is related to the production, manufacturing, and freight-in of the related products purchased from third-party manufacturers. We primarily use contract manufacturers to drop ship products directly to our customers.

We experienced cost increases for raw materials during the year ended December 31, 2021 primarily due to industry shortages in supply and consistent with market demand. Compared to the prior year, commodity protein costs have increased 133% negatively affecting our gross margin. We are taking steps to manage the increase and shortages by entering into agreements with additional protein brokers to diversify our protein sources, along with working with new vendors to source other component such as tubs, trays and bags.

We have focused on cost containment and improving gross margins by concentrating on customers with higher margins, reducing product discounts and promotional activity, along with reducing the number of SKU’s and negotiating improved pricing for raw materials. With recent increases in commodity prices, our gross margins have eroded and will continue to be impacted.

General and Administration

Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits, professional fees, depreciation and amortization, research and development, information technology equipment and network costs, facilities related expenses, directors’ fees, legal fees, accounting and audit fees, consulting fees, stock-based compensation, investor relations costs, insurance and other corporate expenses.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, our general and administration expenses were approximately $9.9 million compared to $13.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, or a decline of approximately $3.1 million or 24% due to a decrease in salaries and benefits associated with a reduction in headcount, reducing operating costs and board member compensation, as well as a reduction in office expenses associated with closure of headquarters and warehouses. Salaries and benefits are down $1.6 million or 25%; Office and IT expenses are down $0.8 million or 46%.

As a percentage of net revenues, general and administration expenses were approximately 20% for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to 20% for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Selling and Promotion

Our selling and promotion expense consists primarily of expenses related to freight-out, print and online advertising, club demonstrations, and stock-based compensation. Historically, advertising and promotions were a large part of both our growth strategy and brand awareness, in particular strategic partnerships with sports athletes and fitness enthusiasts and endorsements, licensing, and co-branding agreements. Additionally, we co-developed products with sports athletes and teams. In connection with our restructuring plan, we terminated most of these contracts in a strategic shift away from such costly arrangements and moved toward digital advertising, ambassador programs and sampling promotional materials.

31

For the year ended December 31, 2021, our selling and promotion expenses were approximately $4.4 million compared to $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020; an increase of $0.5 million or 13%. The increase was primarily related to an increase in freight-out and other increases in Club Demonstrations and stock-based compensation related to our Energy business.

As a percentage of net revenues, selling and promotion expenses were approximately 9% for the year ended December 31, 2021, compared to 6% for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase for 2021 expenses was primarily driven by a 23% increase in freight-out.

Impairment of Intangible Assets

For the year ended December 31, 2020, we incurred approximately $0.2 million of impairment of intangible assets. For the year ended December 31, 2021 we had no impairment.

Loss of Settlement of Obligation

For the year ended December 31, 2021, our loss on settlement of obligation was approximately $2,000 compared to $95,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company settled with two contract manufactures, Nutrablend and Excelsior Nutrition and recorded a loss of $95,000 for the year related to these obligations.

Gain on Settlement of Payables

For the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded amounts aggregating approximately $1.7 million as a gain on the settlement of liabilities, the result of the imputation of interest due to the long-term nature of the payouts as follows:

Years Ending December 31,   
    
2013(9 months) $260,210 
2014  436,688 
2015  311,209 
Total minimum lease payments $1,008,107 
On September 25, 2020, we entered into a settlement agreement with Nutrablend, a manufacturer of our products, pursuant to which we agreed to pay approximately $3.1 million in monthly payments from September 1, 2020 through June 30, 2023.
On December 16, 2020, we entered into a settlement agreement with Excelsior Nutrition, a manufacturer of our products, pursuant to which we agreed to pay approximately $4.8 million in monthly payments beginning January 5, 2020 and thereafter until the settlement amount is paid in full.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recorded no gain on settlement of payables. The remaining amounts owed related to these settlements is reflected in accrued and other liabilities.

Interest Expense

For the year ended December 31, 2021, interest expense was approximately $5.4 million compared to $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, or an increase of $3.9 million or 260%.

Interest expense increased as a result of a higher debt balance due the issuance of the Senior Secured debt offering during the year ended December 31, 2021.

Other Income, Net

The Company’s other income increased from $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 to $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. During 2021, the Company recognized a gain of $1.0 million related to the forgiveness of the Company’s Paycheck Protection Program loan and sublease income $0.4 million, partially offset by the Company’s foreign currency translation gain/loss, primarily related to trade with Canadian customers.

32

Provision for Income Taxes

For the year ended December 31, 2021, we recognized a tax benefit of approximately $8,000 compared to a tax benefit of approximately $19,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020. Our provision for income taxes consists primarily of federal and state income taxes in the U.S. and income taxes in foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct business. Due to uncertainty, as to the realization of benefits from our deferred tax assets, including net operating loss carryforwards, research and development and other tax credits, we have a full valuation allowance reserved against such assets. We expect to maintain this full valuation allowance at least in the near term.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have incurred significant losses and experienced negative cash flows since inception. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had cash of approximately $1.2 million, a decline of $780 from the December 31, 2020 balance of $2.0 million. As of December 31, 2021, we had a working capital deficit of $30.1 million, a stockholders’ deficit of $32.2 million and an accumulated deficit of $205.5 million resulting from recurring losses from operations. As a result of our history of losses and financial condition, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon us generating profitable operations in the future and/or obtaining the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. We are evaluating different strategies to obtain financing to fund our expenses and achieve a level of revenue adequate to support our current cost structure. Financing strategies may include, but are not limited to, private placements of capital stock, debt borrowings, partnerships and/or collaborations.

We have funded our operations from proceeds from the sale of equity and debt securities. We will require significant additional capital to make the investments we need to execute our longer-term business plan. Our ability to successfully raise sufficient funds through the sale of debt or equity securities when needed is subject to many risks and uncertainties and, even if it were successful, future equity issuances would result in dilution to our existing shareholders and future debt securities may contain covenants that limit our operations or ability to enter into certain transactions.

We will need to raise additional funding through strategic relationships, public or private equity or debt financings, grants or other arrangements to develop and seek regulatory approvals for our existing and new product candidates. If such funding is not available, or not available on terms acceptable to us, our current development plan and plans for expansion of our general and administrative infrastructure may be curtailed.

Cash Flows

A summary of our cash flows is as follows (in thousands):

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data:      
Net cash used in operating activities $(8,042) $(868)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities  (2)  218 
Net cash provided by financing activities  7,264   1,121 
Net change in cash $(780) $471 

33

Net Cash Operating Activities

Our net cash used in operating activities was $8.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to net cash used in operating activities of $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Net Cash Investing Activities

Our net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021, was $0.002 million compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Net Cash Financing Activities

Our net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021, was $7.3 million compared to $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA

In addition to disclosing financial results calculated in accordance with GAAP, this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K discloses Adjusted EBITDA, which is net loss adjusted for stock-based compensation, gain on settlement of accounts payable, (gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment, interest expense, depreciation of property and equipment, amortization of intangible assets, and (benefit) provision for income taxes.

Management uses Adjusted EBITDA as a supplement to GAAP measures to further evaluate period-to-period operating performance, as well as the Company’s ability to meet future working capital requirements. Management believes this non-GAAP measures will provide investors with important additional perspectives in evaluating the Company’s ongoing business performance.

The GAAP measure most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA is net income (loss). The non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss). Adjusted EBITDA is not a presentation made in accordance with GAAP and has important limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because Adjusted EBITDA excludes some, but not all, items that affect net income (loss) and is defined differently by different companies, our definition of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.

Set forth below are reconciliations of our reported GAAP net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):

  

Year ended

December 31, 2021

  

Year ended

December 31, 2020

 
Net income (loss) (GAAP) $(12,866) $3,185 
Non-GAAP adjustments:        
Gain on disposal of property and equipment  -   (160)
Loss on settlements  (143)  (1,687)
Impairment of operating lease right of use asset  -   167 
Stock compensation expense  653   144 
Interest and other expense, net  5,039   1,188 
Depreciation of Property and Equipment  10   145 
Amortization of Intangible Assets  321   320 
PPP Loan Forgiveness  (965)  - 
Benefit for income taxes  (8)  (19)
Loss foreign currency  28   - 
Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP) $(7,931) $3,283 

34

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and form the basis for the following discussion and analysis on critical accounting policies and estimates. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires managementus to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and liabilitiesexpenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities atthat are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates and those differences could have a material effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The preparation of our Financial Statements and the daterelated disclosures in conformity with GAAP, requires our management to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts of revenue, expenses, income, assets, and liabilities, reported in our Financial Statements and accompanying notes. Understanding our accounting policies and the extent to which our management uses judgment, assumptions, and estimates in applying these policies is integral to understanding our Financial Statements.

We describe our most significant accounting policies in “Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies” of our consolidated notes to our Financial Statements and found elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. These policies are considered critical because they may result in fluctuations in our reported results from period to period due to the significant judgments, estimates, and assumptions about highly complex and inherently uncertain matters. In addition, the use of different judgments, assumptions, or estimates could have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. We evaluate our critical accounting estimates and judgments required by our policies on an ongoing basis and update them as appropriate based on changing conditions.

Revenue Recognition

Our revenue represents sales of finished goods inventory and is recognized when control of the financial statementspromised goods is transferred to our customers in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those goods. The reserves for trade promotions and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

Making estimates requires management to exercise significant judgment. It is at least reasonably possible that theproduct discounts, including sales incentives, are established based on our best estimate of the effect of a condition, situation or set of circumstances that existed at the dateamounts necessary to settle existing credits for products sold as of the financial statements, which management considered in formulating its estimate could changebalance sheet date.

All such costs are netted against sales. These costs include end-aisle or other in-store displays, contractual advertising fees and product discounts, and other customer specific promotional activity. We provide reimbursement to our customers for such amounts as credits against amounts owed. To determine the appropriate timing of recognition of consideration payable to a customer, all consideration that is payable to our customers is reflected in the near term due to one or more future non-conforming events. Accordingly, the actual results could differ significantly from estimates.transaction price at inception and reassessed routinely.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable represents trade obligations from customers that are subject to normal trade collection terms. We periodically evaluateterms and are recorded at the collectabilityinvoiced amount, net of our accounts receivableany sales discounts and considers the need to establish an allowance for doubtful accounts, based upon historical collection experience and specific customer information. Accordingly, the actual amounts could vary from the recorded allowances.

We perform ongoing evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and generally do not require collateral. Management reviewstypically bear interest. We assess the collectability of the accounts by taking into consideration the aging of accounts receivable, periodicallychanges in customer credit worthiness, general market and reduces the carrying amount by a valuation allowance that reflects management’s best estimate of amounts that may not be collectible. Allowances, if any, for uncollectible accounts receivable are determined based upon information availableeconomic conditions, and historical experience.

We do not charge interest on past due receivables. Receivables are determined to be past due based on the payment terms of the original invoices.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We measure assets and liabilities at fair value based on an expected exit price as defined by the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements, which represents the amount that would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability, as the case may be, in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value may be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The authoritative guidance on fair value measurements establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis whereby inputs, used in valuation techniques, are assigned a hierarchical level.

The following are the hierarchical levels of inputs to measure fair value:

·Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

·Level 2: Inputs reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

·Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting our assumptions incorporated in valuation techniques used to determine fair value. These assumptions are required to be consistent with market participant assumptions that are reasonably available.

Revenue Recognition

We record revenue when all of the following have occurred: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) product has been shipped or delivered, (3) the sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.

Depending on individual customer agreements, sales are recognized either upon shipment of products to customers or upon delivery. We record sales allowances and discounts as a direct reduction of sales.

We have determined that advertising related credits that were granted to customers fell within the guidance of ASC No. 605-50-55 (“Revenue Recognition” – Customer Payments and Incentives – Implementation Guidance and Illustrations) . The guidance indicates that, absent evidence of benefit to the vendor, appropriate treatment requires netting these types of payments against revenues and not expensing as advertising expense.

We have an informal seven day right to return products. There were nominal returns at the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.

Foreign Currency

We began operations in Canada in April 2012. The Canadian Dollar was determined to be the functional currency as the majority of the transactions related to the day to day operations of the business are exchanged in Canadian Dollars. At the end of the period, the financial results of the Canadian operation are translated into United States Dollars, which is the reporting currency, and added to the U.S. operations for consolidated company financial results. The revenue and expense items are translated using the average rate for the period and the assets and liabilities at the end of period rate. Transactions that have completed the accounting cycle and resulted in a gain or loss related to translation are recorded in realized gain or loss due to foreign currency translation under other income expense on the income statement. Transactions that have not completed their accounting cycle but appear to have gain or loss due to the translation process Bad debt expenses are recorded as unrealized gain or loss due to translationpart of “General and heldadministrative” expenses in the equity section onconsolidated statements of operations. We reserve the receivable balance sheet untilagainst the allowance when management determines a balance is uncollectible. We also review our customer discounts, and an accrual is made for discounts earned but not yet utilized at each period end.

Litigation Estimates and Accruals

In the normal course of business or otherwise, we may become involved in legal proceedings. We will accrue a liability for such date the accounting cycle ofmatters when it is probable that a transaction is completeliability has been incurred and the actual realized gain oramount can be reasonably estimated. When only a range of possible loss can be established, the most probable amount in the range is recognized.

Beneficial Conversion Feature

For conventional convertible debt whereaccrued. If no amount within this range is a better estimate than any other amount within the raterange, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. The accrual for a litigation loss contingency might include, for example, estimates of conversion is below market value, we record a “beneficial conversion feature” (“BCF”)potential damages, outside legal fees and other directly related debt discount.

When we record a BCF, the relative fair value of the BCF wouldcosts expected to be recorded as a debt discount against the face amount of the respective debt instrument. The discount would be amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt.

Derivative Liabilities

Fair value accounting requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments such as conversion features in convertible debt or equity instruments, and measurement of their fair valueincurred. We provide disclosures for accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value, we use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. In assessing the convertible debt instruments, management determines if the convertible debt host instrument is conventional convertible debt and further ifmaterial contingencies when there is a beneficial conversion feature requiring measurement. Ifreasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may be incurred. In assessing whether a loss is a reasonable possibility, we may consider the instrument is not considered conventional convertible debt, we will continue our evaluation process of these instruments as derivative financial instruments.

Once determined, derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each reporting period end, with any increase or decrease infollowing factors, among others: the fair value being recorded in results of operations as an adjustment to fair value of derivatives. In addition, the fair value of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants, are also valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

Debt Issue Costs and Debt Discount

We may pay debt issue costs, and record debt discounts in connection with raising funds through the issuance of convertible debt. These costs are amortized over the lifenature of the debt to interest expense. If a conversionlitigation, claim or assessment, available information, opinions or views of the underlying debt occurs, a proportionate share of the unamortized amounts is immediately expensed.

Original Issue Discount

For certain convertible debt issued, we provide the debt holder with an original issue discount. The original issue discount is recorded to debt discountlegal counsel and additional paid in capital at an amount not to exceed gross proceeds raised, reducing the face amount of the note and is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt.

Share-Based Payments

Generally, all forms of share-based payments, including stock option grants, warrants, restricted stock grants and stock appreciation rights are measured at their fair value on the awards’ grant date, based on estimated number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Share-based compensation awards issued to non- employees for services rendered are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the fair value of the share-based payment, whichever is more readily determinable.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04 “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 requires reporting entities to disclose additional information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, ASU 2011-04 requires reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. This pronouncement has been implemented in the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 without impact.

BUSINESS

General

MusclePharm Corporation, a Nevada corporation (“MusclePharm”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) was incorporated in the state of Nevada on August 4, 2006, under the name “Tone in Twenty” for the purpose of engaging in the business of providing personal fitness training using isometric techniques. On February 18, 2010, Tone in Twenty acquired all of the issued and outstanding equity and voting interests of Muscle Pharm, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, in exchange for 30,589 shares of its common stock. As a result of this transaction, Muscle Pharm, LLC became a wholly owned subsidiary of Tone in Twenty, and Tone in Twenty changed its name to “MusclePharm Corporation.” Our principal executive offices are located at 4721 Ironton Street, Building A, Denver, Colorado 80239 and our telephone number is (303) 396-6100.

We develop, market and sell athlete-focused, high quality nutritional supplements primarily to specialty resellers. Our products have been formulated to enhance active fitness regimens, including muscle building, weight loss and maintaining general fitness. Our nutritional supplements are available for purchase in over 10,500 U.S. retail outlets, including Dick’s Sporting Goods, GNC, Vitamin Shoppe and Vitamin World. We also sell our products to over 100 online channels, including bodybuilding.com, amazon.com, gnc.com and vitacost.com. Internationally, our nutritional supplements are sold in approximately 90 countries, and we expect that international sales will be a significant portion of our sales for the foreseeable future.

We started formulating our nutritional supplements in 2008 for consumption by active individuals, high performance athletes and fitness enthusiasts. We launched our sales and marketing programs in late 2008 through our internal sales executives and staff targeting specialty retail distributors.

We supply our nutritional supplements to elite athletes on teams in the National Football League, Major League Baseballother advisors, and the National Basketball Association, as well as Ultimate Fighting Championship fighters. While these endorsers and professional sports teams use our products, no endorsement by any of them as to the merits of our securities should be inferred.experience gained from similar cases.

Our products were created through our six-stage process using the expertise of distinguished nutritional scientists we have retained and they are typically field tested using a pool of several elite athletes on various teams in the National Football League, Major League Baseball and National Basketball Association, as well as Ultimate Fighting Championship fighters. We do not directly manufacturer or ship our products to most of our customers. Rather, we outsource our manufacturing to non-affiliated third parties who fulfill our orders and ship products directly to our customers.

We have recently experienced significant growth in our product sales. Our net sales for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were $67.1 million and $17.2 million, respectively. Our net sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, were $22,561,167 and $16,560,680, respectfully. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2012, we commenced operations in Ontario, Canada, through our subsidiary Canada MusclePharm Enterprises Corp.

At the 2012 Bodybuilding.com Supplement Awards, we received three Awards of Excellence; we received (i) the “Brand of the Year” award, (ii) the “Packaging of the Year” award, and (iii) the “Pre-Workout Supplement of the Year” award for AssaultTM .

Our headquarters in Denver, Colorado has a state-of-the-art over 30,300 square feet athletic facility with a medical and clinical testing department, complete with equipment for measuring and conducting athletic clinical studies and supporting athletes. Our medical and clinical professionals consist of several nationally recognized medical doctors and nutritional experts who oversee our product research, formulation, efficacy analysis and testing.

Recent Developments

Reverse Stock Split and Increase in Number of Authorized Shares of Common Stock

On November 26, 2012, we (i) effected a 1-for-850 reverse stock split of our common stock, including a proportionate reduction in the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 2.36 billion shares to 2.8 million shares of common stock, and (ii) amended our articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock (post reverse stock split) from 2,941,177 to 100 million effective November 27, 2012. All share and per share amounts in this document have been changed to give effect to the reverse stock split.

2835
 

ConversionShare-Based Payments and Stock-Based Compensation

Share-based compensation awards, including stock options and restricted stock awards, are recorded at estimated fair value on the applicable awards’ grant date, based on the estimated number of Warrants into Common Stockawards that are expected to vest. The grant date fair value is amortized on a straight-line basis over the time in which the awards are expected to vest, or immediately if no vesting is required. Share-based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services are also recorded at fair value on the grant date. The fair value of restricted stock awards is based on the fair value of the stock underlying the awards on the grant date as there is no exercise price.

The fair value of stock options is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The determination of the fair value of each stock award using this option-pricing model is affected by our assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and the expected term of the awards based on an analysis of the actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors and the contractual term of the awards. Due to our limited experience with the expected term of options, the simplified method was utilized in determining the expected option term as prescribed in ASC 718 Compensation – Stock Compensation.

We recognize our stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period, which is generally consistent with the vesting of the awards, based on the estimated fair value of all stock-based payments issued to employees and directors that are expected to vest.

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies during the period covered by this report.

Warrants

In late September 2012,conjunction with the Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”), we issued 512,675 shares17,355,700 warrants to the senior note holders. The warrants entitle the holder to purchase one share of our common stock at an exercise price equal to several accredited investors$.78 per share at any time on or after October 13, 2021 (the “Initial Exercise Date”) and on or prior to the close of business on October 13, 2026 the “Termination Date”). We determined that these warrants are free standing financial instruments that are legally detachable and separately exercisable from the debt instruments. Management also determined that the warrants are puttable for cash upon a fundamental transaction at the option of the holder and as such required classification as equity pursuant to conversions of warrants to purchase an aggregate of 723,747 shares of our common stock. As a result of these warrant conversions and other extinguishments of derivative liabilities during the quarter ended September 30, 2012, our stockholders’ deficit decreased from $11,013,113 at June 30, 2012 to $7,297,593 at September 30, 2012 and our derivative liabilities decreased from $7,908,960 at June 30, 2012 to $24,889 at September 30, 2012. On December 5, 2012, we converted a warrant exercisable for 4,902 shares of common stock into 3,677 shares of our common stock. Thereafter, our derivative liability was reduced to approximately $300 as of December 5, 2012.

Registered Direct Offerings

On February 4, 2013, we completed the final closing of our registered direct offering of an aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of our Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, at a public offering price of $8.00 per share pursuant to an offering registeredASC 470. In accordance with the SEC. Each share of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into two shares of common stock, subject to adjustment. Our netaccounting guidance, the outstanding warrants are recognized as equity on the balance sheet. The proceeds from the offering were approximately $10.8 million after placement agent discounts, and other offering expensessale of $1.2 million. Net proceeds from this offering were useda debt instrument with stock purchase warrants (detachable call options) shall be allocated to reduce indebtedness and for other corporate purposes.

As of July 9, 2013, 1,355,000 Series D shares have been converted into 2,710,000 sharesthe two elements based on the relative fair values of the Company’s common stockdebt instrument without the warrants, and 145,000 shares of Series D preferred stock remain outstanding.the warrants themselves at time of issuance. The allocation of the portion of the value resulted in a discount of the debt instrument. The fair value of the warrants were measured using the Black Scholes option pricing model.

Private Placements of Common Stock

On March 26, 2013, the Company entered into subscription agreements with non-affiliated accredited investors for the issuance of 703,236 shares of common stock pursuant to exemptions from registration under federal and state securities laws. The shares of common stock were sold for $8.50 per share. The gross proceeds to the Company of $6.0 million were reduced by commissions and issuance costs of $115,000. These shares of common stock are being registered in the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

In May, 2013, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with one non-affiliated investor for the issuance of 100,000 shares of common stock pursuant to exemptions from registration under federal and state securities laws. The shares of common stock were sold for $8.50 per share. These shares of common stock are being registered in the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

On June 3, 2013, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with one non-affiliated accreditor investor for the issuance of 150,000 shares of common stock pursuant to exemptions from registration under federal and state securities laws. The shares of common stock were sold for $10.00 per share. The gross proceeds of $1,500,000 were reduced by commissions and issuance costs of $75,000. Those shares of common stock are being registered in this registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

Our Growth Strategy

Our primary growth strategy is to:

36
 

BUSINESS

Overview

MusclePharm is a scientifically-driven, performance lifestyle company that develops, manufactures, markets and distributes branded sports nutrition products and functional energy beverages. Since our incorporation in 2006, we have developed a comprehensive product portfolio, which has fueled the widespread recognition of our brands, MusclePharm and FitMiss. Today, these brands are sold in more than 100 countries globally, supported by our diversified and industry-leading distribution partners. We believe our strong international presence has allowed us to attract a larger and more engaged social audience than our competitive peers, Our global reach to a large and engaged customer base enables us to achieve The MusclePharm Promise of helping professional athletes and everyday active individuals reach their maximum potential with the most scientifically advanced, safe and nutritious sports supplementation products possible.

“The MusclePharm Promise” guides our endeavors to support the health of individuals and is comprised of three key pillars:

·increaseLeading by Example. We place considerable emphasis on transparency, high-quality ingredients, innovation and science. Our products undergo rigorous, independent third-party testing to ensure safe, quality ingredients to support all levels of athletic ability. Tests performed on products include banned substance testing and protein verification, among others.
Supporting Active Lifestyles. Our product portfolio is designed for athletes of all levels and anyone who pursues an active, healthy lifestyle. We offer a broad range of performance powders, capsules, tablets, bars and functional energy beverages that satisfy the needs of enthusiasts and professionals alike.
Enhancing Public Health. Through our productSpecialty, International, Food, Drug, and Mass (“FDM”), and newly introduced Grocery and Convenience distribution channels, we are able to reach athletes and sales through increased market penetrations both domesticallyactive individuals of all types and internationally;demographics. We believe in the importance of our consumers having access to our products where and when they need them.

·increase our margins by focusing on streamlining our operations and seeking operating efficiencies in all areas of our operations;

·continue to conduct additional testing of the safety and efficacy of our products and formulate new products; and

·increase awareness of our products by increasing our marketing and branding opportunities through endorsements, sponsorships and brand extensions.

Our Core Marketing StrategyProducts

Our core marketing strategy is to brand MusclePharm as the “must have”product portfolio consists of two categories, sports nutrition and functional energy beverages, and targets a variety of fitness brand for workout enthusiasts and elite athletes. We seek to be known as The Athletes Company® , run by athletes who create their products for other athletes, both professional and otherwise. We believe that our marketing mix of endorsers, sponsorships and providing sample products for our retail resellers to use is an optimal strategy to increase sales.

Sponsorships and Promotions

Since 2011, we have been the official supplement provider and sponsor of the Ultimate Fighting Championship, or UFC. Our sponsorship includes prominent logo placement on the fighting mat, and our branding can be seen on FOX Television Stations, FX Networks, FUEL TV and Pay-Per-View television worldwide. The UFC fighters we sponsor feature our brand on their uniforms and we also extensively advertise at the UFC events.

We are also currently engaged in various in-store promotions, including point-of-purchase stands, aisle displays in retail outlets,professionals, as well as sample demonstrations in Dick’s Sporting Goods, GNC, Vitamin World and Vitamin Shoppe.individuals who lead an active lifestyle.

37

Sports Nutrition

 

In 2011, we launched an advanced website in seeking to tap into the social networking worldOur product portfolio consists of two categories, sports nutrition and to further our brandfunctional energy beverages, and consumer awareness. The information in our website is not parttargets a variety of this prospectus. We have included our website addressfitness enthusiasts and professionals, as a factual reference and do not intend it to bewell as individuals who lead an active link to our website. Also, we currently have over 617,000 fans combined between our company and executive officer Facebook and Twitter accounts.lifestyle.

Sport Series. In order to cover the needs of athletes, we introduced our scientifically-advanced, performance-driven Sport Series category. These award-winning , independently-tested products help fuel athletes safely by increasing strength, energy, endurance, recovery and overall athletic performance. It features our Combat Protein Powder, a top selling five-protein blend on the market, currently available in 4 flavors.
Essentials Series. To meet the day-in and day-out demands of fitness and sport, the Essentials Series (formerly known as the Core Series) line of supplements exists for athletes to take daily. These products include daily staples for a healthy body, such as BCAA, creatine, glutamine, carnitine, CLA, fish oil, a multi-vitamin and more.
FitMiss. Designed and formulated specifically for the female body, FitMiss sports nutrition products are complementary to any active female’s diet. In seeking a stronger, more balanced foundation, FitMiss ingredients support women in areas of weight management, lean muscle mass, body composition, and general health and wellness. Currently, FitMiss protein powder is available in 2 flavors.
On-the-Go. As more and more consumers are seeking healthier and convenient snacking options, retailers across multiple channels are capitalizing on this emerging trend by aggressively expanding their better-for-you assortments. Our On-the-Go portfolio of ready to eat products includes our award-winning Combat Crunch Protein Bars, currently available in 4 flavors.

Industry OverviewFunctional Energy Beverages

Combat Energy. In order to tap into the ever-growing functional beverage market, we recently launched our Combat Energy drink line. Unlike traditional energy drinks, Combat Energy has zero sugar and zero calories and features the functional benefits of 300mg of caffeine and 600mg of BCAA aminos. Our Combat Energy line is available in the three flavors: Green Apple, Grapefruit Lime and Black Cherry.
FitMiss Energy. Based on the feedback we received from female consumers, we developed and meticulously formulated FitMiss Energy. This recently launched product features 200 milligrams of caffeine per can, zero calories, zero sugar, MusclePharm’s proprietary BCAA blend, Biotin and no artificial colors or flavors. Currently, we sell this functional energy beverage in the following three flavors: Pineapple Coconut, Mango Sunshine and Watermelon Waterfall.

We operate within the large and growing U.S. nutritional supplements industry.

38

Industry

Global Sports Nutrition

According to Nutrition Business Journal’s 2012 Supplement Business Report,a 2021 analysis by Grand View Research, the global sports nutrition market is expected to experience double digit growth, growing at a compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of 10.9% from 2021 to 2028. A rise in demand is expected to stem from consumers’ increased focus on self-care, preventive medication and fitness. This heightened focus is particularly due to the rapidly growing number of individuals with diabetes and obesity that are at risk of serious illness from COVID-19. Given that our products are designed to enhance one’s health and fitness ability, we expect to benefit and capitalize on these attractive industry generated over $30 billion in sales in 2011 and $28.1 billion in 2010, and is projected to grow at an average annual rate of approximately 6.0% through 2020.tailwinds.

Global Functional Beverages

According to Nutrition Business Journal, sports nutrition products represented approximately 12% ofa 2021 report by Fior Markets, the total sales in the U.S. nutritional supplements industry in 2011, and the categoryfunctional beverage market is expected to grow at a 9.1% compound annualCAGR of 7.1% from 2021 to 2028. This growth rate (or CAGR)is expected to stem from 2012an increased demand for ready-to-drink beverages by consumers who seek to 2020, representingmaintain their health despite their hectic, busy lifestyles. We believe this growth will be compounded even more by millennials’ strong preference for foods that are convenient and have diverse nutritional profiles. For these reasons, we anticipate that our newly introduced Combat Energy and FitMiss Women’s Complete Energy will experience increased demand, along with our On-The-Go product line.

Our Strengths

Consumer Awareness of Our Brands

According to Nutritionix.com, our Combat Protein Powder is the fastest growing product categoryfourth best protein brand in the nutritional supplements industry.world, and Grand Review Research names MusclePharm as one of the top players in the North American sports nutrition market. For these reasons, we believe consumers have a strong appetite for our brand and products, which is exemplified by our large and engaged social media following. Widespread brand recognition as one of the safest, most trusted and reliable performance lifestyle companies is a strength we seek to maintain, as it allows for organic growth and fosters the adoption of new product innovations.

Strong Intellectual Property

We believe there are several key demographic, healthcare and lifestyle trends drivingthat protecting our intellectual property is crucial to the continued growthsuccessful implementation of our industry. These trends include:business strategy and marketing our products. Therefore, our policy is to rigorously pursue registrations for all trademarks associated with our products. We have over 39 trademark applications in the United States, 29 of which are currently registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Our registered trademarks include registrations of our house marks, as well as marks associated with our core product lines.

We also have filed for protection of various marks throughout the world and are committed to a significant long-term strategy to build and protect the MusclePharm and FitMiss brands globally. The “MusclePharm” and “FitMiss” marks have been granted final trademark registration effective in 10 countries, including the United States.

Asset Light Business Model

Through our asset light model, we achieve low capital expenditures, which we believe is critical to the generation of high free cash flows, gross margin, and lower commodity pricing. Currently, we outsource all manufacturing, testing and bottling to third-parties, and despite challenges in 2020 due to COVID-19, we believe our asset light model will enable us to achieve strong results and profitability in future quarters. For these reasons, we believe our business is uniquely positioned for profitability, without sacrificing the support of our growth initiatives.

39
 ·Increasing awareness of nutritional supplements across major age and lifestyle segments of the U.S. population. We believe that awareness of the benefits of nutritional supplements is growing among active, younger populations, providing the foundation for our future consumer base. In addition, the average age of the U.S. population is increasing and data from the United States Census Bureau indicates that the number of Americans age 65 or older is expected to increase by approximately 36% from 2010 to 2020. We believe that these consumers are likely to increasingly use nutritional supplements and generally have higher levels of disposable income to pursue healthier lifestyles.

·Increased focus on fitness and healthy living. We believe that consumers are trying to lead more active lifestyles and become increasingly focused on healthy living, nutritional and supplemental. According to the Nutrition Business Journal’s 2012 Supplement Business Report, 20% of the U.S. adult population (or 47 million people) were regular or heavy users of vitamins in 2011. We believe that growth in our industry will continue to be driven by consumers who increasingly embrace health and wellness as an important part of their lifestyles.

ParticipantsGrowth Strategy

Product Innovation

We believe continued innovation in delivery techniques and ingredients, new product lines, and new products in existing lines is important to sustaining and creating new market opportunities, meeting consumer demand, and strengthening customer relationships. Over the last several years, we have launched several new products to meet changing consumer needs and to accelerate our growth. In 2021, we rolled out our functional energy beverages lines under the MusclePharm and FitMiss brands. With continued market expansion of functional beverages, coupled with consumers’ increased focus on ready-to-drink healthy alternatives, we expect our zero sugar and zero calorie energy drinks to benefit from these better-for-you industry tailwinds. Similarly, in 2019, we expanded our On-The-Go assortments with the introduction of gluten free and non-GMO protein products, along with new flavors of our award-winning Combat Crunch Protein Bars. These On-The-Go product assortments target a wide and growing audience, as consumers increasingly demand convenient and ready-to-eat snacks with healthy, diverse nutritional profiles. We continuously monitor market opportunities and consumer trends in order to strategically plan and execute future product innovations. We continue to drive innovation in our industry include specialty retailers, supermarkets, drugstores, mass merchants, multi-level marketing organizations, online retailers, mail-order companiesalready popular protein powder line and in 2021 we launched a variety of other small participants. The nutritional supplements sold throughnew and improved formula, delivering better taste and mixability in our two top selling products, Combat 100% Whey and Combat Protein powder.to To maintain strong demand for our functional energy beverages, we will closely monitor and evaluate customer feedback for future product innovations to sustain our leadership position in the beverage market.

Expand Sales in Current and New Channels

We currently distribute our products across all major global retail channels – Specialty, International and FDM. This, paired with our large e-commerce customers, allows us to reach every relevant market in the world. Due to the high competition within these channels, and the ever-changing customer trends, we have undertaken a number of initiatives to expand into new distribution channels, increase product trial, and amplify brand messaging.

As we continue to scale our functional energy beverages, we expect to increase our distribution points through Grocery and Convenience channels and expect product trial to increase, providing us with the opportunity to convert trial customers into loyal, repeat purchasers, and ultimately, consumers of our broader product categories. While these initiatives are divided into four majortargeted towards acquiring new, loyal customers, we plan to grow with existing customers through our established, industry-leading distribution partners in the Specialty, International, and FDM. Through increased store penetration and shelf-space, we believe we can grow sales of our functional energy beverages with existing customers by providing widespread accessibility. Given the importance we place on widespread accessibility, we also plan on advancing our e-commerce presence through strategic partnerships, which we believe will not only enhance sales among new and existing customers but also further the global reach of our brand and products.

Leverage Existing Brand Awareness for New Products

As we continue to execute our growth strategy and focus on core and new product categories: vitamins, mineralsinnovations, we plan on leveraging our existing brand awareness to successfully penetrate domestic and health supplements; sports nutrition products; diet products;international markets. We believe our established brand recognition, recurring customer base, and other wellness products. Most supermarkets, drugstores and mass merchants have narrow nutrition supplement product offerings limited primarily to simple vitamins and herbs, with less knowledgeable sales associates than specialty retailers.

Our Products

We currently offer 28 athlete-focused, high quality nutritional supplement products. Nonefar reach will further advance the adoption of our products and growth. In the past, our passionate and loyal following has demonstrated a keen appetite for new MusclePharm products and we believe this will continue to play a vital role in the success of future product rollouts.

Sales and Marketing

Our goal is to position MusclePharm as the “must have” brand for elite athletes and fitness enthusiasts, alike, who are formulatedon a journey to contain substances thatholistically better themselves and achieve their maximum potential. Our marketing is focused on our most prominent products and includes brand partnerships, focusing on grass-roots marketing and advertising efforts with retail outlets close to our core audience. Our marketing includes digital marketing, print and media advertising, in store product demonstrations, promotional giveaways, and trade show events. New product innovation is also a key component of driving incremental sales.

40

Distribution Channels

MusclePharm brands are marketed across major global retail distribution channels – Specialty, International and FDM.

Specialty: This channel is composed of brick-and-mortar sales and e-commerce. Due to high competition within this market, we continually seek to respond to customer trends and shifts by adjusting the mix of existing product offerings, developing new innovative products and influencing preferences through our marketing.

International: Our international reach touches every relevant market in the world. We seek to further grow our international sales by continuing to offer new products in key markets as well as opening new distribution channels in select regions of the world. We also are evaluating the benefits of developing expanded contract manufacturing relationships outside of North America to take advantage of local opportunities.

FDM: This channel is primarily served by our direct sales force, as well as our network of brokers. We believe direct relationships with retail partners provide us an opportunity to expand our distribution into additional discount warehouses and national retailers.

Below is a table of net revenue by our major distribution channel (in thousands):

  For the Months Ended March 31, 
  2022  % of Total  2021  % of Total 
Distribution Channel                
Specialty $3,383   26% $6,795   52%
International $733   6%  3,847   29%
FDM $8,985   68% $2,479   19%
Total $13,101   100% $13,121   100%

Product Research, Development and Quality Control

Customers’ belief in the safety and efficacy of our products is critical. Continued innovation in delivery techniques and ingredients, new product line extensions, and new product offerings are important in order to sustain existing and create new market opportunities, meet consumer demand, and strengthen consumer relationships. To support our research and development efforts, we invest in formulation, processing and packaging development, perform product quality and stability studies, and conduct consumer market research to sample consumer opinions on product concepts, design, packaging, advertising, and marketing campaigns.

We are committed to science and sport being equal in our product development. We believe real-world applications are essential. Our product lines have been the subjectdeveloped through a stringent protocol to ensure that all formulations promote quality and safety for our customers. Our quality control team follows detailed supplier selection and certification processes, validation of publicized health concerns by the medical community such as ephedra, androstene, androstenedione, aspartame, steroids or human growth hormones.raw material verification processes, analytical testing, process audits, and other quality control procedures. Our products are comprisedalso subject to extensive shelf-life stability testing. We also engage third-party laboratories to routinely evaluate and validate our internal testing processes on every MusclePharm product.

We qualify ingredients, suppliers, and facilities by performing site assessments and conducting on-going performance and process reviews. Dedicated quality teams regularly audit and assess manufacturing facilities for compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices (“GMPs”), as regulated by the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), to ensure our compliance with all MusclePharm, regulatory, and certification standards and requirements. To ensure overall consistency, our quality assurance team adheres to strict written procedures. From the raw ingredient stage to the finished product stage, we monitor and perform quality control checks. Before distributing our products, we place our products under quarantine to test for environmental contaminants and verify that the finished product meets label claims. Once a product has successfully passed quality assurance testing and conforms to specifications for identity, purity, strength, and composition, we then conduct testing with third-party laboratories for added label claim verification.

41

Multi-level practices are part of our product development process to ensure athletes and our consumers receive what we believe to be the most scientifically innovative and safest products on the market. Post-distribution, we have standard operating procedures in place for investigating and documenting any adverse events or product quality complaints. We are committed to the process of having all of our products certified to be banned-substance-free before they are available to consumers. Informed Choice, a globally recognized leader in sports testing, conducts all of our third-party banned substance testing, ensuring that all MusclePharm products are free of banned substances.

Manufacturing and Distribution

We have relationships with multiple third-party manufacturers. Certain of our vendors supply in excess of 10% of our products. Once a product is manufactured, it is shipped directly to the customer or through a third-party distribution center. All of the third-party manufacturing facilities and distribution facilities we utilize are designed and operated to meet current GMP standards as promulgated by the FDA.

The manufacturing process performed by our third-party manufacturers generally consists of the following operations: (I) qualifying ingredients for products; (ii) testing of all raw ingredients; (iii) measuring ingredients for inclusion in production; (iv) granulating, blending and grinding ingredients into a mixture with a homogeneous consistency; (v) encapsulating or filling the blended mixture into the appropriate dosage form using either automatic or semiautomatic equipment; and (vi) testing finished products prior to distribution.

We maintain and operate a system that integrates distribution, warehousing, and quality control. This provides real-time lot and quality tracking of raw materials, work in progress and finished goods. We employ a supply chain staff that works with sales, marketing, product development, and quality control personnel to ensure that only products that meet all specifications are produced and released to customers.

Our Competitors

The sports nutrition market is very competitive, and the range of products is diverse and subject to rapid and frequent changes in consumer demand. Competitors use price, shelf space and store placement, as well as brand and product recognition, new product introductions, and raw materials to capture market share. We believe that retailers look to partner with suppliers who demonstrate brand development, market intelligence, customer service, and produce high quality products with proven science. We believe we are competitive in all these areas.

Our competitors include numerous nutritional companies that are highly fragmented in terms of geographic market coverage, distribution channels, and product categories. In addition, we compete with large pharmaceutical companies and packaged food and beverage companies. Many of these competitors have greater financial and distribution resources available to them than us and some compete through vertical integration. In addition, private label entities have gained a foothold in many nutrition categories and also are direct competitors. Our principal competitors are: Glanbia Performance Nutrition (Optimum Nutrition), Nutrabolt, (Cellucor C4), Dymatize Enterprises LLC, Celsius and Iovate Health Sciences International Inc. As many of our competitors are either privately held or divisions within larger organizations, it is difficult to fully gauge their size and relative ranking.

Government Regulation

The formulation, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, advertising, distribution, storage, and sale of each of our product groups are subject to regulation by one or more governmental agencies. The most active of these is the FDA, which regulates our products under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder. FDA regulations relating specifically to foods and dietary supplements for human use are set forth in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

42

Dietary Supplement Regulation

The FDA has primary jurisdiction for the regulation of dietary supplements. The FDA regulates dietary supplements under the FDCA as a separate regulatory category of “foods.” The FDCA has been amended several times with respect to dietary supplements, including by the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990 (the “NLEA”) and the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994. A “dietary supplement” is defined under the FDCA as “a product (other than tobacco) intended to supplement the diet that bears or contains one or more of the following dietary ingredients: vitamins, minerals, herbs and herbal extracts, carbohydrates, proteins and amino acids, tested by our recognized scientists, and intended to be safe and effective forherbs or other botanicals; a concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract or combination of the overall health of athletes. Moreover, our nutritionalingredients listed above.” Dietary supplements are intended to enhance the effectsdiet, and may not be represented as a conventional food or as the sole item of workouts, support muscle recoverya meal or diet.

Dietary supplements do not require approval from the FDA before they are marketed. Except in the case of a “new dietary ingredient,” where pre-market review for safety data and other information is required by law, a company is not required to provide the FDA with the evidence it relies on to substantiate safety or effectiveness before marketing a supplement product. A manufacturer or distributor must notify the FDA if it intends to market a dietary supplement in the U.S. that contains a “new dietary ingredient.” A new dietary ingredient is an ingredient marketed after October 15, 1994. The manufacturer must demonstrate to the FDA that the new ingredient is reasonably expected to be safe for use in a dietary supplement. There is no authoritative list of dietary ingredients that were marketed before October 15, 1994. Therefore, manufacturers are responsible for determining if a dietary ingredient is “new.”

Manufacturers of dietary supplements must register with the FDA pursuant to the Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (“Bioterrorism Act”) before producing supplements. Manufacturers of dietary supplements also must follow current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) regulations for the preparation, packaging and storage of our food and dietary supplements. Entities that manufacture, package, label or hold dietary supplement products must follow applicable cGMP regulations. These regulations focus on practices that ensure the identity, purity, quality, strength and nourishcomposition of dietary supplements. We engage with third-party manufacturers to manufacture our dietary supplements.

Our business practices and products are also regulated by the human bodyFederal Trade Commission (“FTC”), the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and the Environmental Protection Agency. The USDA governs certain product labeling, such as organic and non-GMO claims. The FTC has the primary responsibility of regulating the advertising of foods, including dietary supplements. Under the FTC Act, all advertising claims, both express and implied, must be truthful, non-misleading, and substantiated. In practice, the FDA and FTC share jurisdiction over promotional practices and monitor the promotion and advertising of dietary supplements in multiple media forms, including TV, radio, social media (e.g., Facebook, Twitter), and the internet. We are responsible for optimal physical fitness. The following is a brief descriptiondetermining that the dietary supplements we manufacture or distribute are safe, and that any representations or claims made about them are substantiated by adequate evidence to show that the claims are not false or misleading.

Our activities, including our direct selling distribution activities, are also regulated by various agencies of our current products:

Product NameDescription and/or Intended Benefits
Amino 1TMHydration sports recovery drink with amino acids, coconut water powder and electrolytes
Armor-V Advanced Multi Nutrient Complex®Advanced multi-vitamin complex; multiple vitamins and minerals along with immune system support
AssaultTMFuel pre-workout power for long-lasting energy to enhance focus and build lean muscle mass
Battle Fuel XTTMHerbal formula to enhance athletic performance and support testosterone production
BCAAPromote muscle development and maintenance through several amino acid complexes
Bizzy Diet® StackTMCombination of products to support fat loss and lean muscle tissue
MusclePharm BulletProof Nighttime Recovery Matrix®Promote deep sleep; optimize recovery; and support growth hormone/testosterone output
Carnitine CoreTMPromote energy for muscle gain and fat loss
CaseinSlow digesting protein with added digestive enzymes and pro-biotic blend
CLA CoreTMSupport body composition and aid in weight loss
Combat Powder®High protein supplement; enhance digestion of nutrients and maximize response to intense training
CreatinePromote strength, power and endurance
MusclePharm Energel®Increased “Energy On The Go® ” for workouts and daily activities
Fish OilBlend of nutritional oils
GetSwole® StackTMCombination of products to support lean muscle mass
GlutamineAssist in recovery time, enhance muscle growth
Hybrid N.O.TMIncrease muscle fullness and vascularity
Live Shredded® StackTMCombination of products to support lean muscle mass maintenance
MusclePharm Musclegel®Protein and nutrition supplement, contains several different proteins
Re-Con®Promote post-workout growth and repair; replenish nutrients
MusclePharm Shred Matrix®Multi-level weight-loss system; increase metabolism, decrease body fat, appetite balance and weight management
Z-Core PMTMMineral support formula to support natural testosterone levels, deep sleep and healthy libido function
FitMiss BurnTMSupport appetite balance, increased energy and healthy metabolism for women
FitMiss CleanseTMSupport healthy body composition and weight management for women
FitMiss DelightTMProtein nutrition shake for women
FitMiss ToneTMSupport body composition and aids in weight loss for women
FitMiss IgniteTMPre-workout energy booster for women
FitMiss BalanceMultivitamin and mineral product for women

MusclePharm Apparel

We granted an exclusive indefinite license to market, manufacture, designthe states, localities and sell our existing apparel line. The licensee paid an initial fee of $250,000foreign countries in June, 2011 and will pay us a 10% net royalty based on the licensee’s net income at the end of each fiscal year. As of March 31, 2013, we had not earned any royalty revenue under this licensing arrangement.

Quality in Our Products

In seeking quality inwhich our products we require that before a product is broughtare sold. In foreign markets, prior to market, all:

·supplements are supported with publicly available scientific research and references;

·our manufacturers carry applicable manufacturing licenses;

·ingredients are combined so that their effectiveness is not impaired;

·ingredients are in dosage levels that fall within tolerable upper intake levels established for healthy people by the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies;

·products do not contain any substances banned by major sporting organizations such as the World Anti-Doping Agent, or WADA, NFL or MLB, or adulterated ingredients such as ephedra, androstenedione, aspartame, steroids or human growth hormones;

·formulations have a minimum two-year shelf life; and

·tablets, capsules and soft gels are designed to readily dissolve in the body to facilitate absorption.

Future Products

New products are derived from a number of sources, including our management, trade publications, scientificcommencing operations and health journals, consultants and distributors. Prior to introducing new products, we investigate product formulations as they relate to regulatory compliance and other issues.

Research and Development

Eachinitiating or permitting sales of our products in the market, we may be required to obtain an approval, license or certification from the country’s ministry of health or comparable agency. Prior to entering a new market in which a formal approval, license or certificate is required, we work extensively with local consultants and authorities in order to obtain the endrequisite approvals.

We must also comply with product labeling and packaging regulations that vary from country to country. Our failure to comply with these regulations can result in a product being removed from sale in a particular market, either temporarily or permanently. In the U.S., foods and dietary supplements are subject to the Nutrition, Labeling and Education Act (“NLEA”), which governs health claims, ingredient labeling, and nutrient content claims characterizing the level of a six stage processnutrient in a product. Dietary supplements may be intended to affect the structure or function of the human body. If the label of a dietary supplement contains such structure/function claims, the label must bear the disclaimer: “This statement has not been evaluated by the FDA. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.”

All serious adverse events occurring within the United States involving recognized nutrition scientists, doctorsdietary supplements must be reported to the FDA. FDA laws also govern the recalls of foods and professional athletes. Our expenses for researchdietary supplements.

We may be required to obtain an approval, license or certification from a foreign country’s ministry of health or comparable agency prior to commencing operations and development for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, were approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively and for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, were approximately $0.02 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

Management Information, Internet and Telecommunication Systems

The ability to efficiently manage distribution, compensation, inventory control, and communication functions through the use of sophisticated and dependable information processing systems is critical to our success.

We continue to invest in applications and integrations to improve and optimize business processes and to increase performance company wide.

Product Returns

We provide an informal seven day right of return for our products. Historically, product returns as a percentageinitiating or permitting sales of our net sales have been nominal.regulated products in foreign markets. Prior to entering a new market in which a formal approval, license or certificate is required, we work with local consultants and authorities in order to obtain the requisite approvals. We also must comply with product labeling and packaging regulations that vary from country to country. Our failure to comply with these regulations can result in a product being removed from sale in a particular market, either temporarily or permanently.

Trademarks and Patents

43

Intellectual Property

We regard our trademarks and other proprietary rights as valuable assets and believe that protecting our key trademarksintellectual property is crucial to our business strategy of building strong brand name recognition. These trademarks are crucial elementsthe continued successful implementation of our business and havestrategy. Since we regard our intellectual property as a crucial element of our business with significant value in the marketing of our products.

Ourproducts, our policy is to rigorously pursue registrations for all of the trademarks associated with our products. Federally registered trademarks have a perpetual life, provided that they are maintained and renewed on a timely basis and used correctly as trademarks, subject to the rights of third parties to attempt to cancel a trademark if priority is claimed or there is confusion of usage. We rely on common law trademark rights to protect our unregistered trademarks. Common law trademark rights generally are limited to the geographic area in which the trademark is actually used, while a United States federal registration of a trademark enables the registrant to stop the unauthorized use of the trademark by any third party anywhere in the United States. Furthermore, the protection available, if any, in foreign jurisdictions may not be as extensive as the protection available to us in the United States.

Although we seek to ensure that we do not infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, there can be no assurance that third parties will not assert intellectual property infringement claims against us.

We have obtained U.S. registration on trademarks for eight of our products with USPTOover 39 trademark applications pending on several of our newest products. We have abandoned or not pursued efforts to register marks identifying other items in our product line for various reasons including the inability of some names to qualify for registration. We also received federal trademark registration for 14 names or expressions that we use or intend to use to distinguish ourselves from others, with several USPTO applications pending. All trademark registrations are protected for an initial period of five years and then are renewable after five years if still in use and every 10 years thereafter.

We have filed for a provisional patent to protect technology used in certain of our products, including MusclePharm Musclegel® and Re-Con®. The patent was filed in the United States, 29 of which are currently registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Our registered trademarks include registrations of our house marks , as a Patent Cooperation Treaty application to secure patent protection worldwide. An International Search Report Written Opinion was issued in October 2012, and was published at the International Bureau on February 28, 2013.well as marks associated with our core product lines.

We also have filed for protection of various marks throughout the world and are committed to a significant long-term strategy to build and protect the MusclePharm brand globally. The “MusclePharm” mark is pending registration in 14 countries. The mark hasand “FitMiss” marks have been granted final trademark registration effective in six10 countries, including the United States.

Seasonality

Our business does not typically experience seasonal variations, but revenue may fluctuate based upon promotions.

Employees

As of March 31, 2022 we had 21 total employees, most of whom were full time. None of the employees are represented by a union. Management considers its relations with our employees to be good and to have been maintained in a normal and customary manner.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we believemay be subject to litigation and claims arising in the remaining registrations will beordinary course of business. For information regarding legal proceedings, see part II Item 1, as well as Note 8 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) contained in our Quarterly Report for the three months ended March 31, 2022.

White Winston Select Asset Fund Series MP-18, LLC et al., v MusclePharm Corp., et al., (Nev. Dist. Ct.; Cal. Superior Court; Colorado Dist. Ct.; Mass. Super. Ct.)

On August 21, 2018, White Winston Select Asset Fund Series MP-18, LLC and White Winston Select Asset Fund, LLC (together “White Winston”) initiated a derivative action against the Company and its directors (the “director defendants”). White Winston alleges that the director defendants breached their fiduciary duties by improperly approving the refinancing of three promissory notes issued by the Company to Mr. Drexler (the “Amended Note”) in exchange for $18.0 million in loans. White Winston alleges that this refinancing improperly diluted their economic and voting power and constituted an improper distribution in violation of Nevada law. In its complaint, White Winston sought the appointment of a receiver over the Company, a permanent injunction against the exercise of Mr. Drexler’s conversion right under the Amended Note, and other unspecified monetary damages. On September 13, 2018, White Winston filed an amended complaint, which added a former executive of the Company, as a plaintiff (together with White Winston, the “White Winston Plaintiffs”). On December 9, 2019, the White Winston Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint, in which they added allegations relating to the resignation of the Company’s auditor, Plante & Moran PLLC (“Plante Moran”). the Company has moved to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. That motion has not yet been fully briefed.

Along with its complaint, White Winston also filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and preliminary injunction enjoining the exercise of Mr. Drexler’s conversion right under the Amended Note. On August 23, 2018, the Nevada district court issued an ex parte TRO. On September 14, 2018, the court let the TRO expire and denied White Winston’s request for a preliminary injunction, finding, among other things, that White Winston did not show a likelihood of success on the merits of the underlying action and failed to establish irreparable harm. Following the court’s decision, the Company filed a motion seeking to recoup the legal fees and costs it incurred in responding to the preliminary injunction motion. On October 31, 2019, the court awarded the Company $56,000 in fees and costs.

Due to the uncertainty associated with determining our liability, if any, and due to our inability to ascertain with any reasonable degree of likelihood, as of the date of this report, the outcome of the trial, the Company has not recorded an estimate for its potential liability.

44

On June 17, 2019, White Winston moved for the appointment of a temporary receiver over the Company, citing Plante Moran’s resignation. The court granted withinWhite Winston’s request to hold an evidentiary hearing on the next several months.

motion, but subsequently stayed the action pending the parties’ attempts to resolve their dispute. Although the parties have been unable to reach a resolution, the litigation has not yet resumed. On July 30, 2019, White Winston filed an action in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles, seeking access to the Company’s books and records and requesting the appointment of an independent auditor for the Company. On February 25, 2021, the court ordered the Company to produce certain documents, denied White Winston’s request for an auditor, and ordered the Company to pay a $1,500 penalty. On July 20, 2021 the California court awarded White Winston $93,000 in attorneys’ fees and cost relating to the books-and-records action. The “MP” logoCompany paid the amounts due on July 30, 2021, and on August 4, 2021 White Winston submitted a filing acknowledging that the California court’s judgment has been fully satisfied.

The Company and its Chief Executive Officer have been named as defendants in a new lawsuit filed on February 8, 2022 by White Winston Select Asset Funds, LLC and registration grantedWhite Winston Select Asset Fund Series Fund MP-18, LLC (collectively, “White Winston”) in one country. The applicationthe Superior Court of Suffolk County Massachusetts. White Winston is bringing claims alleging unfair trade practices, abuse of process, malicious prosecution, breach of duty of loyalty and, in the alternative, for protectionbreach of the logosettlement agreement relating to the prior action filed by White Winston in Nevada. The Company has not yet responded to complaint and at this time cannot reasonably estimate any loss that may arise from this matter.

Bakery Barn, LLC v. MusclePharm Corporation

On January 24, 2022, Bakery Barn (“Bakery Barn”) filed suit against Company in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania court. Company received the Complaint on February 16, 2022. Bakery Barn alleges that the Company owes Bakery Barn over $1.9 million dollars for breach of contract. Parties operated on an open account basis with payment terms established by mutual verbal agreement, custom and usage. Beginning in late 2020, Bakery Barn resumed production for Company and operated under a verbal agreement until August 2021. Bakery Barn contends that Company is expectedrequired to bereimburse Bakery Barn for foil wraps ordered by Bakery Barn in the amount of $77,800, specific ingredients totaling $42,400, and products manufactured under purchase order Invoice no. 59192 delivered to Company in the amount of $1,816,017.

On February 24, 2022, Flaherty Fardo Rogel & Amick, LLC (“Company Counsel”) filed a Praecipe for Appearance on behalf of the Company. On February 28, 2022, Company Counsel filed Preliminary Objections to Complaint and Brief In Support Thereof. Bakery Barn filed an Amended Complaint in Civil Action on March 14, 2022. Company Counsel is in the process of filing Preliminary Objections to this Amended Complaint. The Company intends to continue to vigorously litigate the matter.

Bar Bakers, LLC v. CFC/Flavor Producers, LLC. Vs MusclePharm

On March 18, 2022, the Company retained Barnes & Thornburg to represent it in connection with a Cross-Complaint filed in the near futureSuperior Court of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-2019-01073098-CU-BC-CJC in 26 additional countries. Going forward, we expect to seek trademark registration for our best-selling international products.

Competition

We compete with many companies engaged in selling nutritional supplements. The sports nutrition business is highly competitive. Most of our competitors have significantly more financial and human resources than we do, and have operating histories longer than ours. We seek to differentiate our products and marketing from our competitors based on our product quality, the use of sports celebrity endorsers and through our marketing program. Competition is based primarily on quality and assortment of products, marketing support, and availability of new products. Currently, our main competitors are three private companies: Optimum Nutrition,matter Bar Bakers LLC v. Creative Flavor Concepts, Inc., or Optimum, Iovate Health Sciences, Inc., or IHS, and Bio-Engineered Supplements and Nutrition, Inc., or BSN. Optimum is a wholly owned subsidiary of Glanbia Nutritionals, Inc., an international nutritional ingredients group. Optimum owns and operates two brands of nutritional supplements (Optimum Nutrition and American Body Building), providing a line of products across multiple categories. IHS is a nutritional supplement company that delivers a range of products et al.. According to the nutritional marketplace. Headquarteredpleadings, the matter arises from an agreement between the plaintiffs and defendants in Oakville, Ontario, Canada, IHS’s line of products can be found in major retail storeswhich the plaintiff agreed to manufacturer energy bars and include such brands as Hydroxy-Cut™, Cell-Tech™, Six Star Nutrition™. BSN is also a sports nutrition leader whose top products include No-Explode™sell them to the defendants. The defendants then sold the energy bars to various retailers, including the Company. On May 29, 2019, the plaintiff sued the defendants alleging that the defendants were responsible for unpaid invoices – nine for bars manufactured and Syntha Six Protein™.

delivered to the Company and one invoice for raw materials. According to the pleadings, the unpaid invoices total $885,163.72. The retail market for nutritional supplements is characterized by a few dominant national companies, including GNC, Vitamin World, Vitamin Shoppe, and Great Earth Vitamin Stores. Others have a presence within local markets, such as Vitamin Cottage in Denver, Colorado. Four companies dominate the online channel—bodybuilding.com, vitamins.com (owned by Puritan’s Pride), GNC.com and vitaminshoppe.com, the latter two having retail sales locations as well.

Major competitors in the sports nutrition and weight-loss markets consist of companies such as EAS, Inc., Weider Nutrition International, Inc. and Twinlab Corporation, which dominate the market with such products as Myoplex (EAS), Body Shaper (Weider) and Ripped Fuel (Twinlab).

We also compete with a number of large direct selling firms selling nutritional, diet, health, personal care and environmental products, and numerous small competitors. The principal direct selling competitors are Amway Corporation, Nature’s Bounty, Inc., Sunrider Corporation, New Vision USA, Inc., Herbalife International of America, Inc., USANA, Inc., and Melaleuca, Inc.

We intend to compete by aggressively marketing our brand, emphasizing our relationships with professional athletes, and maximizing our relationships with those athletes, retail outlets and industry publications that align with our vision.

Our Manufacturers

We are committed to producing and selling highly efficacious products that are trusted for their quality and safety. To date, our products have been outsourced to a third party manufacturer where the products are manufactured in full compliance with the current good manufacturing practice, or cGMP, standards set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA.

We use four non-affiliated principal manufacturersinvoice for the components of our products, and multiple vendors for packaging and labeling. We have an agreement in place with our primary manufacturer. This agreement was designed to support our growth and ensure consistence in production and quality. Our primary manufacturer purchases all needed raw materials from suppliers. Additionally, our primary manufacturer is allegedly $4,658,593.02. On January 31, 2022, one of the defendants, Flavor Producers LLC, filed and served a cross claim against the Company alleging that it was partially responsible for acquisitionany damages that may befall on it. Specifically, Flavor Producers is asking the Court to award it $389,989.60 in compensatory damages. On March 25, 2022, the Company filed an answer to that cross claim denying the factual allegations and storage of all product inventory (at both on and off-site facilities). We do not take title to our products until time of shipment to retailers. The three non-primary manufacturers are governed by purchase order terms and can be terminated at any time.

Our relationship with any of our manufactures may be terminated upon proper notice. We have established relationships with other manufacturersFlavor Producers’ assertion that we believe can satisfy our needs if our relationship with any manufacturer terminates.

Product Delivery

All of our products shipped out of the United States are shipped by our manufacturers directly to our retailers. Our manufacturers collect sales tax on products based upon the address of the consumer to whom products are sent regardless of how the order is placed. Products sold by MuscleCharm Canada are shipped from our inventory held in Canada. We collect sales tax on products when applicable.

Regulatory Matters

Government Regulation and Statutes – Product Regulation

Domestic

The manufacture, packaging, labeling, advertising, promotion, distribution and sale of our products are subject to regulation by one or more federal agencies, including the FDA, Consumer Product Safety Commission, or CPSC, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or USDA. Advertising and other forms of promotion and methods of marketing are subject to regulation primarily by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, which regulates these activities under the Federal Trade Commission Act, or FTCA. The foregoing matters regarding our products are also regulated by various state and local agencies as well as those of each foreign country to which we distribute our products.

The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, or DSHEA, amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FFDC Act, to establish a new framework governing the composition, safety, labeling, manufacturing and marketing of dietary supplements. All of the products we market are regulated as dietary supplements under the FFDC Act.

Generally, under the FFDC Act, dietary ingredients that were marketed in the United States prior to October 15, 1994 may be used in dietary supplements without notifying the FDA. “New” dietary ingredients (i.e., dietary ingredients that were “not marketed in the United States before October 15, 1994”) must be the subject of a new dietary ingredient notification submitted to the FDA unless the ingredient has been “present in the food supply as an article used for food” without being “chemically altered”. A new dietary ingredient notification must provide the FDA with evidence of a “history of use or other evidence of safety” establishing that use of the dietary ingredient “will reasonably be expected to be safe”. A new dietary ingredient notification must be submitted to the FDA at least 75 days before it is initially marketed. The FDA may determine that a new dietary ingredient notification does not provide an adequate basisentitled to conclude that the ingredient is reasonably expected to be safe. Such a determination could prevent the marketing of the dietary ingredient. The FDA recently issued draft guidance governing the notification for new dietary ingredients. Although FDA guidance is not mandatory, and companies are free to use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of applicable laws and regulations, FDA guidance is a strong indication of the FDA’s “current thinking” on the topic discussed in the guidance, including its position on enforcement. At this time, it is difficult to determine whether the draft guidance, if finalized, would have a material impact on our operations. However, if the FDA were to enforce the applicable statutes and regulations in accordance with the draft guidance as written, this manner of enforcement could require us to incur additional expenses, which could be significant, and negatively impact our business in several ways,any damages, including but not limited to, enjoining the manufacturingcompensatory damages.

45

ThermoLife International

In January 2016, ThermoLife International LLC (“ThermoLife”), a supplier of our products until the FDA determines that we are in compliance and can resume manufacturing, which could increase our liability and reduce our growth prospects.

The Dietary Supplement Labeling Act of 2011, which was introduced in July 2011 (S1310), would amend the FFDC Act to, among other things, (i) require dietary supplement manufacturers to register the dietary supplements that they manufacture with the FDA (and provide a list of the ingredients in and copies of the labels and labeling of the supplements), (ii) mandate the FDA and the Institute of Medicine (a non-governmental, nonprofit organization that provides advicenitrates to the public and decision makers, such asCompany, filed a complaint against the FDA, concerning health issues) to identify dietary ingredients that cause potentially serious adverse effects, (iii) require warning statements for dietary supplements containing potentially unsafe ingredients and (iv) requireCompany in Arizona state court. ThermoLife alleged that the FDA define the term “conventional food”. If the bill is reintroduced and enacted, it could restrict the number of dietary supplements available for sale, increase our costs, liabilities and potential penalties associated with manufacturing and selling dietary supplements, and reduce our growth prospects.

The Dietary Supplement Safety Act (S3002) was introduced in February 2010 and would repeal the provision of DSHEA that permits the sale of all dietary ingredients sold in dietary supplements marketedCompany failed to meet minimum purchase requirements contained in the United States prior to October 15, 1994, and instead permit the sale of only those dietary ingredients included onparties’ supply agreement. The court held a list of Accepted Dietary Ingredients to be issued and maintained by the FDA. The bill also would allow the FDA to: impose a fine of twice the gross profits earned by a distributor on sales of any dietary supplement found to violate the law; require a distributor to submit a yearly report on all non-serious adverse event reports received during the year to the FDA; and allow the FDA to recall any dietary supplement it determines with “a reasonable probability” would cause serious adverse health consequences or is adulterated or misbranded. The bill also would require any dietary supplement distributor to register with the FDA and submit a list of the ingredients in and copies of the labels of its dietary supplements to the FDA and thereafter update such disclosures yearly and submit any new dietary supplement product labels to the FDA before marketing any dietary supplement product. If this bill is reintroduced and enacted, it could severely restrict the number of dietary supplements available for sale and increase our costs and potential penalties associated with selling dietary supplements.

The FDA or other agencies could take actions against products or product ingredients that in its determination present an unreasonable health risk to consumers that would make it illegal for us to sell such products. In addition, the FDA could issue consumer warnings with respect to the products or ingredients in such products at the point they are sold to end users. Such actions or warnings could be based on information received through FFDC Act-mandated reporting of serious adverse events. The FDA in recent years has applied these procedures to require that consumers be warned to stop using certain dietary supplements. For businesses that have been subjected to these regulatory actions, sales have been reduced and the businesses have been required to pay refunds for recalled products.

In general, we seek representations and warranties, indemnification and/or insurance from our vendors. However, even with adequate insurance and indemnification, any claims of non-compliance could significantly damage our reputation and consumer confidence in our products. In addition, the failure of such products to comply with applicable regulatory and legislative requirements could prevent us from marketing the products or require us to recall or remove such products from the market, which in certain cases could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Under the current provisions of the FFDC Act, there are four categories of claims that pertain to the regulation of dietary supplements. First are health claims that describe the relationship between a nutrient or dietary ingredient and a disease or health related condition and can be madebench trial on the labelingissue of dietary supplements if supported by significant scientific agreementdamages in October 2019, and authorized byon December 4, 2019, the FDAcourt entered judgment in advance via noticefavor of ThermoLife and comment rulemaking. Second are nutrient content claims which describeagainst the nutritional value of the product and may be made if defined by the FDA through notice and comment rulemaking and if one serving of the product meets the definition. Third are statements of nutritional support or product performance. The FFDC Act permits “statements of nutritional support” to be included in labeling for dietary supplements without FDA pre-market approval. These statements must be submitted to the FDA within 30 days of marketing and may describe how a particular dietary ingredient affects the structure, function or general well-being of the body, or the mechanism of action by which a dietary ingredient may affect body structure, function or well-being, but may not expressly or implicitly represent that a dietary supplement will diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat or prevent a disease. A company that uses a statement of nutritional support in labeling must possess scientific evidence substantiating that the statement is truthful and not misleading. The fourth category are drug claims, representations that a product is intended to diagnose, mitigate, treat, cure or prevent a disease, are prohibited from useCompany in the labelingamount of dietary supplements, and we make no drug claims regarding our products.

We may make claims for our dietary supplement products regarding three$1.6 million, comprised of the four categories, that are statements of nutritional support, health claims and nutrient content claims when authorized by the FDA, or that otherwise are allowed by law. The FDA’s interpretation of what constitutes an acceptable statement of nutritional support may change$0.9 million in damages, interest in the future, thereby requiring that we revise our labeling. These regulatory activities include those discussed above concerning products marketed before October 15, 1994 or afterwards,amount of $0.3 million and attorneys’ fees and costs in the requirementsamount of 75 days advance notice$0.4 million. The Company recorded $1.6 million in accrued expenses in 2018. The Company has filed an appeal and posted bonds in the total amount of $0.6 million in order to the FDA before marketing products containing new dietary ingredients. There is no assurance that the FDA will accept the evidence of safety for any new dietary ingredients that we may wish to market, and the FDA’s refusal to accept that evidence could prevent the marketing of the new dietary ingredients and dietary supplements containing a new dietary ingredient. If the FDA determines that a particular statement of nutritional support is an unacceptable drug claim, conventional food claim or an unauthorized version of a “health claim”, or, if the FDA determines that a particular claim is not adequately supported by existing scientific data or is false or misleading, we would be prevented from using the claim.

In addition, DSHEA provides that so-called “third-party literature”, e.g., a reprint of a peer-reviewed scientific publication linking a particular dietary ingredient with health benefits, may be used “in connection with the sale of a dietary supplement to consumers” without the literature being subject to regulation as labeling. The literature: (1) must not be false or misleading; (2) may not “promote” a particular manufacturer or brand of dietary supplement; (3) must present a balanced view of the available scientific informationstay execution on the subject matter; (4) if displayed in an establishment, must be physically separate fromjudgment pending appeal. Of the dietary supplements; and (5) should not have appended to it any information$0.6 million, $0.25 million (including fees) was paid by sticker or any other method. If the literature fails to satisfy each of these requirements, we may be prevented from disseminating such literature with our products, and any dissemination could subject our product to regulatory action as an illegal drug.

Our dietary supplements must also comply with the Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act, which became effective on December 22, 2007. This law amends the FFDC Act to mandate that we report to the FDA any reports of serious adverse events that we receive. Under the law, an “adverse event” is any health-related event associated with the use of a dietary supplement that is adverse, and a “serious adverse event” is any adverse event that results in death, a life-threatening experience, inpatient hospitalization, a persistent or significant disability or incapacity, or a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or requires, based on reasonable medical judgment, a medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of these outcomes. Serious adverse event reports received through the address or phone number on the label of a dietary supplement, as well as all follow-up reports of new medical information received within one year after the initial report, must be submitted to the FDA no later than 15 business days after the report is received. The law also requires recordkeeping for reports of non-serious adverse events as well as serious adverse events for six years following the event, and these records are subject to FDA inspection.

In June 2007, pursuant to the authority granted by the FFDC Act as amended by DSHEA, the FDA published detailed current good manufacturing practice, or cGMP, regulations that govern the manufacturing, packaging, labeling and holding operations of dietary supplement manufacturers. The cGMP regulations, among other things, impose significant recordkeeping requirements on manufacturers. The cGMP requirements are in effect for all manufacturers, and the FDA is conducting inspections of dietary supplement manufacturers pursuant to these requirements. There remains considerable uncertainty with respect to the FDA’s interpretation of the regulations and their actual implementation in manufacturing facilities. The failure of a manufacturing facility to comply with the cGMP regulations renders products manufactured in such facility “adulterated”, and subjects such products and the manufacturer to a variety of potential FDA enforcement actions.

The FDA has also announced its intention to promulgate new cGMPs specific to dietary supplements, to fully enforce DSHEA and monitor compliance with the Bioterrorism Act of 2002. We intend to comply with the new cGMPs once they are adopted. The new cGMPs, predicted to be finalized shortly, would be more detailed and stringent than the cGMPs that currently apply to dietary supplements and may, among other things, require dietary supplements to be prepared, packaged, produced and held in compliance with regulations similar to the cGMP regulations for drugs. There can be no assurance that, if the FDA adopts cGMP regulations for dietary supplements, we will be able to comply with the new regulations without incurring a substantial expense.

In addition, under the Food Safety Modernization Act, or FSMA, which was enacted on January 4, 2011, the manufacturing of dietary ingredients contained in dietary supplements will be subject to similar or even more burdensome manufacturing requirements, which will likely increase the costs of dietary ingredients and will subject suppliers of such ingredients to more rigorous inspections and enforcement. The FSMA will also require importers of food, including dietary supplements and dietary ingredients, to conduct verification activities to ensure that the food they might import meets applicable domestic requirements.

The FDA has broad authority to enforce the provisions of federal law applicable to dietary supplements, including powers to issue a public warning or notice of violation letter to a company, publicize information about illegal products, detain products intended for import, require the reporting of serious adverse events, require a recall of illegal or unsafe products from the market, and request the Department of Justice to initiate a seizure action, an injunction action or a criminal prosecution in the U.S. courts. The FSMA expands the reach and regulatory powers of the FDA with respect to the production and importation of food, including dietary supplements. The expanded reach and regulatory powers include the FDA’s ability to order mandatory recalls, administratively detain domestic products, require certification of compliance with domestic requirements for imported foods associated with safety issues and administratively revoke manufacturing facility registrations, effectively enjoining manufacturing of dietary ingredients and dietary supplements without judicial process. The regulation of dietary supplements may increase or become more restrictive in the future.

Our failure to comply with applicable FDA regulatory requirements could result in, among other things, injunctions, product withdrawals, recalls, product seizures, fines and criminal prosecutions.

Our advertising of dietary supplement products is subject to regulation by the FTC under the FTCA. Section 5 of the FTCA empowers the FTC to prohibit unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce. Section 12 of the FTCA provides that the dissemination of any false advertisement for the purpose of inducing, directly or indirectly, the purchase of drugs or foods, which would include dietary supplements, is an unfair or deceptive act or practice. Additionally, under the FTC’s Substantiation Doctrine, an advertiser is required to have a “reasonable basis” for all objective product claims before the claims are made. Failure to adequately substantiate claims may also be considered an unfair or deceptive practice. Pursuant to this FTC requirement, we are required to have adequate substantiation for all material advertising claims made for our products.

On November 18, 1998, the FTC issued “Dietary Supplements: An Advertising Guide for Industry.” This guide provides marketers of dietary supplements with guidelines for applying FTC law to dietary supplement advertising and reiterates and explains the FTC’s “reasonable basis” determination. It includes examples of the principles that should be used when interpreting and substantiating dietary supplement advertising. Although the guide provides additional explanation, it does not substantively change the FTC’s existing policy that all supplement marketers have an obligation to ensure that claims are presented truthfully and to verify that such claims are adequately substantiated.

The FTC has a variety of processes and remedies available to it for enforcement, both administratively and judicially, including compulsory process, cease and desist orders and injunctions. FTC enforcement can result in orders requiring, among other things, limits on advertising, corrective advertising, consumer redress, divestiture of assets, rescission of contracts and such other relief as may be deemed necessary. Any violation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As a result of our efforts to comply with applicable statutes and regulations in the United States and elsewhere, we have from time to time reformulated, eliminated or relabeled certain of our products and revised certain advertising claims. We cannot predict the nature of any future laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, nor can we determine what effect additional governmental regulations or administrative orders, when and if promulgated, would have on our business in the future. They could, however, require the reformulation of certain products to meet new standards, the recall or discontinuance of certain products not capable of reformulation, additional record keeping, expanded documentation of the properties of certain products, expanded or different labeling, and/or scientific substantiation. Any or all of such requirements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Advertising and labeling for dietary supplements and conventional foods are also regulated by state, county and other local governmental authorities. Some states also permit these laws to be enforced by private attorney generals. These private attorney generals may seek relief for consumers, seek class action certifications, seek class-wide damages, seek class-wide refunds and product recalls of products sold by us. There can be no assurance that state and local authorities will not commence regulatory action, which could restrict the permissible scope of our product advertising claims, or products that can be sold in the future.

Foreign

Our products which we sell or may make plans to sell in foreign countries are also subject to regulation under various national, local and international laws that include provisions governing, among other things, the formulation, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, advertising and distribution of dietary supplements and over-the-counter drugs. These regulations may prevent or delay entry into the market or prevent or delay the introduction, or require the reformulation, of certain of our products. Compliance with such foreign governmental regulations is generally the responsibility of our distributors for those countries. These distributors are independent contractors over whom we have limited control.

Possible New Legislation or Regulation

Legislation may be introduced which, if passed, would impose substantial new regulatory requirements on dietary supplements. For example, although not yet reintroduced in this session of Congress, bills have been repeatedly proposed in past sessions of Congress which would subject the dietary ingredient dehydroepiandrosterone, or DHEA, to the requirements of the Controlled Substances Act, which would prevent the sale of products containing DHEA. In March 2009, the General Accounting Office, or GAO, issued a report that made four recommendations to enhance the FDA’s oversight of dietary supplements. The GAO recommended that the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services direct the Commissioner of the FDA to: (1) request authority to require dietary supplement companies to identify themselves as a dietary supplement company and update this information annually, provide a list of all dietary supplement products they sell and a copy of the labels and update this information annually, and report all adverse events related to dietary supplements, not just serious adverse events; (2) issue guidance to clarify when an ingredient is considered a new dietary ingredient, the evidence needed to document the safety of new dietary ingredients, and appropriate methods for establishing ingredient identity; (3) provide guidance to industry to clarify when products should be marketed as either dietary supplements or conventional foods formulated with added dietary ingredients; and (4) coordinate with stakeholder groups involved in consumer outreach to identify additional mechanisms for educating consumers about the safety, efficacy, and labeling of dietary supplements, implement these mechanisms, and assess their effectiveness. These recommendations could lead to increased regulation by the FDA or future legislation concerning dietary supplements.

We cannot determine what effect additional domestic or international governmental legislation, regulations, or administrative orders, when and if promulgated, would have on our business in the future. New legislation or regulations may require the reformulation of certain products to meet new standards, require the recall or discontinuance of certain products not capable of reformulation, impose additional record keeping or require expanded documentation of the properties of certain products, expanded or different labeling or scientific substantiation.

Employees

We believe that our success will depend significantly on our ability to identify, attract, and retain capable employees. As of June 11, 2013, we had 47 full time employees. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining unit, and we believe our relations with our employees are good. We have recently completed staffing for the in-house medical and physiology center on-site in our training facilities.

Insurance

We maintain commercial liability, including product liability coverage, and property insurance. Our policy provides for a general liability of $1.0 million per occurrence, and $2.0 million annual aggregate coverage which includes our main corporate facility. We carry property coverage on our main office facility to cover our legal liability, tenant’s improvements, business property, and inventory. We maintain product liability insurance with an aggregate cap on retained loss of $5.0 million

Properties

Our corporate headquarters is located in Denver, Colorado. This commercial office building is 30,302 square feet and includes, a full performance training center, medical laboratory and a 96-seat theatre room. The term of the lease is 65 months, expiring on December 31, 2015. We currently pay approximately $13,500 in lease payments per month.

We lease an office and distribution warehouse in Boise, Idaho. The office is 4,776 square feet with a term of two years, expiring October 31, 2014. We currently pay approximately $4,400 per month for this lease. The warehouse is an adjoining property but a separate lease. The warehouse is 9,600 square feet the lease expires December 31, 2014, and the monthly lease payment is $3,360.

We lease a 64,000 square foot warehouse facility in Franklin, Tennessee. The term of the lease is through August 31, 2015. We currently pay approximately $9,450 per month for rent.

Through our Ontario, Canada subsidiary, Canada MusclePharm Enterprises Corp., we lease a 10,000 square foot office and warehouse facility in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The term of the lease expires in April of 2014. We currently pay 6,655 in Canadian dollars (or the U.S. dollar equivalent of about $6,544) per month for rent.

Legal Proceedings

Except as set forth below, we are currently not involved in any new litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. Except as set forth below, there is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our Company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

From time to time, the Company is or may become involved in various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business or otherwise. Legal proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties as to timing, outcomes, costs, expenses and time expenditures by the Company’s management and othersMr. Drexler on behalf of the Company. Although there can be no assurance, based on information currently availableSee “Note 7. Debt” for additional information. The balance of $0.35 million was secured by a personal guaranty from Mr. Drexler, the associated fees of $12,500 and $2,500 have been paid by the Company. On April 27, 2021, the appellate court issued a decision largely affirming the trial court judgement, except vacating the judgement’s $0.3 million prejudgment interest award and remanding for a recalculation of prejudgment interest. On May 18, 2021, ThermoLife filed a motion asking the trial court to increase the Company’s management believesappeal bond to the full amount of the judgment, or $1.9 million, which the Court denied on June 2, 2021.

As of March 31, 2022, the total amount accrued, including interest, was $1.9 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, interest expense recognized on the awarded damages was $0.022 million and $0.022 million, respectfully.

On May 4, 2022, the Arizona Supreme Court denied the Company’s petition for review of the decision of the appellate court and granted ThermoLife’s request for attorney’s fees.

SK Laboratories

On February 3, 2022, MusclePharm sued SK Laboratories in Washoe County (Nevada) District Court. According to the complaint, MusclePharm alleges SK Laboratories (1) breach its contract, (1) breach an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and (3) unjustly enriched itself by artificially inflating its costs and passing those costs onto MusclePharm in breach of its agreement, as well as failing to provide product that complied with Japanese import regulations. There has not been substantial activity in this case given its early stage.

On May 3, 2022, SK Laboratories sued MusclePharm and Ryan Drexler in Los Angeles County Superior Court. In its lawsuit, it is alleging (1) breach of contract, (2) breach of personal guaranty, (3) fraud, (4) unfair business practices, (5) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, (6) negligent interference with prospective economic advantage, and (7) common count on book account claim. According to the outcomeComplaint, SK Laboratories was a contract manufacturer for MusclePharm for approximately nine years manufacturing “a variety of legal proceedingsnutritional supplement products.” Further, according to the complaint, SK Laboratories alleges that are pending or threatenedMusclePharm has defaulted on payments due on purchase orders totaling approximately $4,608,980.12, and a breach of personal guaranty of approximately $500,000 against Ryan Drexler for purchases of whey protein SK made on MusclePharm’s behalf. There has not been substantial activity in this case given its early stage. MusclePharm’s answer is due on approximately June 21, 2022.

Settlements

Manchester City Football Group

The Company was engaged in a dispute with City Football Group Limited (“CFG”), the owner of Manchester City Football Group, concerning amounts allegedly owed by the Company under a sponsorship agreement with CFG (the “Sponsorship Agreement”). In August 2016, CFG commenced arbitration in the United Kingdom against the Company, seeking approximately $8.3 million for the Company’s purported breach of the Sponsorship Agreement.

On July 28, 2017, the Company approved a Settlement Agreement (the “CFG Settlement Agreement”) with CFG effective July 7, 2017. The CFG Settlement Agreement represents a full and final settlement of all litigation between the parties. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to pay CFG a sum of $3 million, which was recorded as accrued expenses in 2017. The settlement consists of a $1.0 million payment that was advanced by a related party on July 7, 2017, a $1.0 million installment paid on July 7, 2018 and a subsequent $1.0 million installment payment to paid by July 7, 2019. Of this amount, the Company has remitted $0.3 million.

During the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company recorded a charge of $0.018 million and $0.018 million, respectively. This charge, representing imputed interest, is included in “Interest expense” in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

46

Nutrablend Matter

On February 27, 2020, Nutrablend, a manufacturer of MusclePharm products, filed an action against the Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, claiming approximately $3.1 million in allegedly unpaid invoices. These invoices relate to the third and fourth quarter of 2019, and a liability has been recorded for the related periods.

On September 25, 2020, the parties successfully mediated the case to a settlement (the “Nutrablend Agreement”) and the Company agreed to (i) pay approximately $3.1 million (“Owed Amount”) in monthly payments (“Monthly Payments”) from September 1, 2020 through June 30, 2023 and (ii) issue monthly purchase orders (“Purchase Orders”) at minimum amounts accepted by Nutrablend.

The Company agreed to issue Purchase Orders in a combined total amount of at least (i) $1.5 million from September 1, 2020 through November 30, 2020; (ii) $1.8 million from December 1, 2020 through February 28, 2021; (iii) $2.1 million from March 31, 2021 through May 31, 2021; (iv) $2.1 million from June 1, 2021 through August 31, 2021; and (v) $1.4 million from September 1, 2021 through October 30, 2021. Beginning on November 1, 2021, the Company will not havebe required to issue monthly Purchase Orders to Nutrablend in a material effectminimum amount of $0.7 million until the Owed Amount is paid in full to Nutrablend. In the event that the Company pays the Owed Amount in full before September 1, 2021, it’s entitled to a rebate on all completed Purchase Orders. Further, once the monthly payments, and any additional payments that the Company has made on the Company’s financial condition. However,Owed Amount, reduce the outcomeoutstanding balance of any of these matters is neither probable nor reasonably estimable.

The Company was partythe Owed Amount to the following legal matters as of December 31, 2011:

·Plaintiff alleged the Company use of Creatine Nitrate in product infringed on a patent held by the Plaintiff. The Company settled this claim in 2012 for a nominal amount.
·Plaintiff alleges the Company’s use of the tagline "Train like an unchained beast" infringes on their mark "Beast" for dietary supplements. The Company settled this claim in 2012 for no consideration and agreed to modify its tagline.
·Plaintiff had filed notices of intent to commence litigation on over 200 sports nutrition and dietary supplement companies in the US and Canada, including the Company. Plaintiff alleged violations of California's Proposition 65. The Company considers this case without merit and merely an attempt by a commercial plaintiff to pressure settlements. The Company had recorded an accrual in the amount of $121,500 as of December 31, 2011 and subsequently settled this claim for $52,000 in 2012.
·Beginning in October 2009, the Company engaged in various business dealings regarding the manufacturing, sale and distribution of products with Fit Foods Manufacturing, Ltd. and Fit Foods Distribution, Inc. jointly, "Fit Foods"). MusclePharm and Fit Foods subsequently became involved in a business dispute regarding their respective obligations and filed claims against each other in District Court. The Parties settled their dispute on December 22, 2010. The Company issued 16,456 shares of common stock having a fair value of $676,980 ($41.14/share), based upon the quoted closing trading price which settled outstanding accounts payable of $333,666, resulting in a loss on settlement of $343,314 All settlement payments have been made and the case was dismissed on July 1, 2011.

As of December 31, 2012,below $2.0 million, the Company is eligible for an extension of a party defendantline of credit from Nutrablend in an amount of up to $3.0 million.

On July 7, 2021, the Company commenced an action against Nutrablend in the following legal proceeding, whichCentral District of California, seeking (i) a declaration that the Company: (a) believesNutrablend Agreement purchase order provisions have been terminated due to Nutrablend’s failure to provide the Company with reasonable assurances of its ability to fulfill its purchase orders; (ii) a declaration that approximately $2.0 million in purchase orders that the Company placed in July and August 2020 were intended to and do count towards the minimums set forth in the Nutrablend Agreement; and (iii) damages based on Nutrablend’s failure to fulfill purchase orders. The case is without merit; and (b) intends to defend vigorously:ongoing.

·William Bossung and Bishop Equity Partners LLC v. MusclePharm Corporation , Clark County, Nevada District Court. Date instituted: January 17, 2012. Plaintiff alleges that additional monetary payments are due in respect of a settlement for outstanding warrants.
·The Tawnsaura Group, LLC v MusclePharm Corporation, Case No: 8:12-cv-01476-JVS-RNB in the United States District Court for the Central District of California .  Date instituted: September 12, 2012. Plaintiff alleges patent infringement for MusclePharm's use of Citrulline Malate in its products.  To date, Plainitiff has filed against over 70 different manufacturers of dietary supplements and sports nutrition products. MusclePharm is part of a joint defense group and believes this case is without merit due to the existence of prior art.

As of DecemberMarch 31, 2012,2022, the Company determined that approximately $0.998 million of the owed amount was due within a year, and this amount was recorded in “Accrued and other liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The present value of the remaining Owed Amount that was due after a year was $0.250 million, and the amount was recorded in “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company made payments of $0.303 million and $0.189 million during the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

On September 23, 2021, the Company entered into an Amendment to a Settlement Agreement that was originally entered into on September 25, 2020. Pursuant to the Amended Agreement, the Company is a party plaintiffno longer obligated to issue Purchase Orders to Nutrablend as stated in the following legal matter:Settlement Agreement, which, as stated in the Form 8-K dated September 25, 2020, consisted of at least (i) $1.5 million from September 1, 2020 through November 30, 2020; (ii) $1.8 million from December 1, 2020 through February 28, 2021; (iii) $2.0 million from March 1, 2021 through May 31, 2021; (iv) $2.1 million from June 1, 2021 through August 31, 2021; and (v) $1.4 million from September 1, 2021 through October 30, 2021. The Monthly Payments provision of the Settlement Agreement remains unchanged.

47
 ·

MusclePharm Corporation v. Swole Sports Nutrition, LLC , United States District

4Excelsior Matter

On March 18, 2019, Excelsior Nutrition, Inc. (“4Excelsior”), a manufacturer of MusclePharm products, filed an action against the Company in the Superior Court for the Southern District of Florida. Date instituted: March 15, 2012. The Company filed this action for trademark infringement after the Defendant started marketing and selling a dietary supplement named “Turbo Shred”. The Company has sold “Shred Matrix” since April 2, 2008, and the mark “MusclePharm Shred Matrix” was granted registration by the USPTO on September 21, 2010.

MANAGEMENT

Directors and Executive Officers of the RegistrantState of California for the County of Los Angeles, claiming approximately $6.2 million in damages relating to allegedly unpaid invoices, as well as approximately $7.8 million in consequential damages.

On December 16, 2020, the Company and 4Excelsior entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (“the Agreement”), pursuant to which the parties resolved and settled the civil action pending in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles (the “Litigation”). The parties agreed to a mutual general release of claims and to jointly file within 10 business days of the effective date of the Agreement a stipulation and proposed order of dismissal, dismissing with prejudice all claims and counterclaims asserted in the Litigation. The Company agreed to pay $4.75 million (the “Settlement Amount”) in four monthly payments of $70,000, beginning January 5, 2021, and thereafter in monthly payments of $100,000 until the Settlement Amount is fully paid. The Company may prepay all or any portion of the Settlement Amount at any time without penalty or premium. The Agreement provides that, in the event of a Default (as defined in the Agreement) by the Company, the entire outstanding balance of the Settlement Amount will become immediately due and payable, plus accrued interest at a rate of 18% per annum, commencing from the date of default.

The Company determined that approximately $1.1 million of the Settlement Amount was due within a year, and this amount was recorded in “Accrued and other liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The present value of the remaining Settlement Amount that was due after a year was $1.6 million, and the amount was recorded in “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company made payments of $0.3 million and $0.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

The table below summarizes accrued expenses and interest expense incurred in for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands):

Cases 

Accrued Amount as of

March 31, 2022

  

Accrued Amount as of

December 31, 2021

  

Interest Expense for Period Ending

March 31, 2022

  

Interest Expense for Period Ending

March 31, 2021

 
Manchester City Football Group $730  $730  $(18) $(18)
Nutrablend Matter  1,248   2,318   (55)  (64)
4Excelsior Matter  2,715   3,597   (77)  (98)
ThermoLife International  1,364   1,364   (22)  (22)
Total $6,057  $8,009  $(172) $(202)

Corporate Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 6728 W. Sunset Rd., Suite 130, Las Vegas, NV. We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on August 4, 2006. Our Internet addresses are www.musclepharm.com and www.musclepharmcorp.com. The information contained on our websites is not incorporated by reference herein.

Available Information

We post the following filings on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC: our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as amended. All such filings are available free of charge on the Investor Relations section of our website, or from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Information on our website does not constitute part of this report. Also available on the Investor Relations section of our website are the charters of the committees of our Board, as well as our corporate governance guidelines and code of ethics.

48

MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information asthe names, positions and ages of July 11, 2013, regarding our directors and named executive officers:officers as of the date of this report.

Name

Age

Position

Ryan Drexler51
Brad J. Pyatt32Co-Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
L. Gary Davis59Chief Financial Officer
John H. Bluher55Co-ChairmanChair of the Board and Executive Presidentof Directors
Richard EstalellaSabina Rizvi5154President Chief OperatingFinancial Officer and Director
Jeremy R. DeLucaMichael Heller3447Executive Vice President – Chief Marketing OfficerDirector
Cory J. GregoryPaul Karr3466Executive Vice President
Michael J. Doron51Director
James J. Greenwell53Director
Donald W. Prosser63Director

Biographical information concerning the directors and executive officers listed above is set forth below:

Brad J. PyattRyan Drexler has served

Ryan Drexler was appointed to serve as our Chief Executive Officer and Director since FebruaryPresident on November 18, 2010 and as our President since October 2012. Prior to our acquisition of Muscle Pharm, LLC, Mr. Pyatt was President and Chief Executive Officer of Muscle Pharm, LLC, since its inception in April 2008. His background includes seven years of experience as a professional athlete, and more than five years of experience in the sports nutrition arena. Mr. Pyatt played in National Football League for the Indianapolis Colts during the 2003, 2004, and 2005 NFL seasons as well for the Miami Dolphins during the 2006 NFL season. Mr. Pyatt played in the Arena Football League for the Colorado Crush during the 2007 and 2008 AFL seasons. Mr. Pyatt attended the University of Kentucky from 1999 to 2002, where he studied kinesiology exercise science, as well as the University of Northern Colorado, from 2002 to 2003. Mr. Pyatt filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the federal bankruptcy laws in 2008. He received a discharge relating to the matter in 2009.

L. Gary Davis has served as our Chief Financial Officer since July 2012. From January, 2010 prior to joining us, Mr. Davis worked as a certified public accountant for various clients, specializing in mergers and acquisitions, and has extensive experience in finance with public traded companies. From November, 2004 to January, 2010, Mr. Davis served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Bodybuilding.com, a sports, fitness and nutritional supplement on-line retail store. He previously was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of U.S. Ecology Corporation, and was previously a director of finance of Fortune 500 Company, Morrison-Knudsen and Vice-President of Finance within Micron Technology. Mr. Davis has a Bachelor’s Degree in Accounting from Boise State University and worked towards a Master’s Degree in Finance from Rochester Institute of Technology. He is a licensed certified public accountant in multiple states.

John H. Bluher has served as our Executive Vice President – Chief Operating Officer since September 2011 and as Co-Chairman of our board of directors since July 2012. From February 2011 to August 2012, he served on the board of directors of Targeted Medical Pharma, Inc. From August 2010 to September 2011, he was managing director of AFH Holdings & Advisory LLC, a business consulting company. From December 2009 to August 2010, Mr. Bluher assisted in raising capital, marketing and co-managed Coachman Energy Funds at Caddis Capital, LLC, a private equity portfolio focused on oil and gas investments. From February 2010 to August 2010, Mr. Bluher acted as investment banker and special financial advisor to the AARP Mutual Fund Board of Trustees in a platform divestiture. From December 2007 to May 2009, Mr. Bluher served as managing director and general counsel at Lehman Brothers, Inc.’s investment management division. Mr. Bluher also served as global chief legal and compliance officer and managing director of Neuberger Berman during this period. From August 2004 to June 2007, Mr. Bluher served as general counsel and director of risk and Janus Capital, Inc. From June 2002 to July 2004, Mr. Bluher served as executive vice president, general counsel and corporate secretary and director of risk management of Knight Trading Group. From January 2001 to May 2002, Mr. Bluher served as senior vice president and global chief compliance officer for Prudential Securities, Inc. From October 1997 to January 2001, Mr. Bluher served as general counsel and chief compliance officer of Sun America, Inc., later AIG. From 1992 through 1997, Mr. Bluher served as Senior Vice President, Regional and Divisional Counsel at Prudential Securities, Inc. From 1987 to 1992, Mr. Bluher was senior counsel for the Division of Enforcement at the Securities and Exchange Commission. Mr. Bluher holds a Bachelor of Science and a J.D. degree from the University of Wyoming and holds FINRA Series 7, Series 24 and Series 14 licenses. He has served on the boards of ICI Mutual Insurance Company, the NASDAQ Chairman’s Advisory Board, Cherry Hills Founders Group, Inc., Safe Communications, Inc., and the University of Wyoming Foundation Board, and College of Law Advisory Board.

Richard Estalella joined the Company as Chief Operating Officer in April 2013. Mr. Estalella served as Senior Vice President of Operations at Arbonne International, LLC since 2005. Mr. Estalella was instrumental in Arbonne’s expansion operations and distribution upgrades and was responsible for all warehouse and distribution facilities, facilities maintenance departments and Customer Service. Previously, between 1998 and 2005, he owned a consulting business specializing in retail, operations, warehousing and distribution.2016. Prior to that, Mr. EstalellaDrexler served as Senior Vice President of Warehouse Operations for Office Depot between 1987 and 1998 and established many of its retail markets, along with its nationwide distribution center network also helped grow it into a $9 billion company.

Jeremy R. DeLuca has been our Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer (former President and Chief Marketing Officer) since November 2010. Prior to joining the Company, from April 1999 to November 2010, Mr. DeLuca served as the President of Bodybuilding.com, an online sports nutrition and supplements company, which he co-founded in 1999. There, Mr. DeLuca was actively involved in all aspects of Bodybuilding.com’s business, with a focus on marketing, sales, and e-commerce. Mr. DeLuca’s responsibilities also included managing vendor relations, marketing strategies, sales promotions, store content and store site development. During Mr. DeLuca’s tenure, Bodybuilding.com experienced significant growth, achieving annual sales of over $200 million in 2010. In August 2012, Mr. DeLuca was fined $600,000 by the FDA in connection with a plea agreement on six misdemeanor counts relating to the FDA’s investigation into allegations that Bodybuilding.com misbranded five dietary supplements.  In connection with the plea, Mr. DeLuca agreed to serve three years of probation.

Cory J. Gregory has served as an executive officer of Muscle Pharm, LLC, since its inception in 2008 and our Senior Vice President (formerly Senior President) since May 2010. Prior to joining us, Mr. Gregory served as President, managing member, and owner of T3 Personal Training LLC, or T3, from April 2009 until November 2011. T3 was a personal training service that managed and oversaw over 40 clients using seven trainers over a ten-year period. During the same period, Mr. Gregory served as President of the Ohio Natural Bodybuilding Federation, a federation founded by Mr. Gregory in 2004 which hosted 14 bodybuilding competitions over a six-year period. He consulted for Agile Enterprises, a nutritional supplement company from January 2006 through January 2008. In 2004, Mr. Gregory purchased the Old School Gym, located in Pataskala, Ohio, which he continues to own at present day.

Michael J. Doron has served as a director since November 5, 2012. He has been the Managing Director of DDR & Associates, LLC since January 2009, and Evolution Capital Partners, LLC since October 2009. From January 2007 to December 2008, he served as Chief Operating Officer and director of Toyshare, Inc. From February 2006 to January 2007, Mr. Doron served as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Frontgate Sundance Alliance. From September 2005 to January 2007, he served as Vice President – Private Banking of the Bank of the West. Mr. Doron earned a BA from the University of Maryland and a Masters of Science from American University.

James J. Greenwell has served as a director since October 15, 2012. Since 2000, he has been theInterim Chief Executive Officer, of Datria Systems Inc., a speech recognition application software company. He has also served as the Datria Systems’ Chairman since 2002. In prior employment, he served as a technology executive in a number of privatePresident and public companies .He has served on the Board of the Cherry Creek School Foundation since September 2010. He was a founding member of Friends of Denver Fire and served on its Board from 2007 through 2010. Mr. Greenwell served on the Board of the Denver Chapter of the American Heart Association from 2002 through 2008 and was Chairman of the board in 2007. He also served on the Board of Trustees of the Bonfils Blood Center Foundation from 1999 through 2003. Mr. Greenwell earned a BS from the College of Business at Michigan State University and an MBA degree from Saint Mary’s College.

Donald W. Prosser has served as a director on our board of directors since July 2012 and has been the principal executive officer of Arête Industries, Inc. since January 2011 and a director of Arête since September, 2003. Arête is a voluntary filer with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Mr. Prosser owns a certified public accounting firm, Donald W. Prosser, P.C., specializing in tax services and accounting and has represented a number of private and public companies serving in the capacity of accountant, member of boards of directors, and as chief financial officer. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Prosser served as Chief Financial Officer and Director for Chartwell International, Inc., a public company publishing high school athletic information and providing athletic recruiting services. From 1999 to 2000, he served as Chief Financial Officer and Director for Anything Internet, Inc. and from 2000 to 2001, served as Chief Financial Officer and Director for its successor, Inform Worldwide Holdings, Inc., a publicly traded company. From November 2002 through June 2008, Mr. Prosser served as CFO of VCG Holding Corp., a public company. From July 2008 through August 2009 Mr. Prosser was Chief Financial Officer of Iptimize, Inc., a provider of broadband and data services that filed a petition under federal bankruptcy laws in October 2009. He also has served on the board of directors of Veracity Management Global, Inc., a publicly traded company, since January, 2008. Mr. Prosser has been a certified public accountant since 1975. Mr. Prosser attended the University of Colorado from 1970 to 1971 and Western State College of Colorado from 1972 to 1975, where he earned a Bachelor’s Degree in Accounting and History (1973) and a Master’s Degree in Accounting – Income Taxation (1975).

Advisory Board

We have established an Advisory Board currently consisting of nine members, which serves to advise management with respect to product formulations, product ideas, marketing and related matters. Members of the Advisory Board do not meet on a formal or regular basis. Our management team consults with one or more members of the Advisory Board as needed, from time to time, by means of meetings or telephone conference calls.

Following is a brief description of the background of our advisory board members:

Dr. Eric Serrano –Chief Formulator Medical Advisor. Dr. Serrano has been practicing medicine in the State of Ohio for over 22 years and is considered one of the leading sports nutrition doctors in the country. His clients include a wide array of athletes from the NFL, NHL, and MLB, in addition to many elite amateur athletes. Dr. Serrano was a professor of family practice medicine at Ohio State University, where he was awarded Professor of The Year and Preceptor of The Year. Dr. Serrano currently lectures across the country to universities, medical groups and health and fitness conferences on the topics of sports nutrition, performance enhancement, and injury prevention. He has formulated numerous nutritional supplements for some of the leading nutritional companies on the market and also been a contributing writer for some of the leading U.S. health and fitness magazines, includingMuscle & Fitness . Dr. Serrano has been involved in the formulations for each of our products. Dr. Serrano received his B.A. from Kansas State University in Biology, his M.A. from Kansas State University in Exercise Physiology, and his M.D. from the University of Kansas Medical School.

Dr. Mauro Di Pasquale – Director of Product Development and Research. Dr. Di Pasquale brings five decades of personal, clinical and university teaching and learning, combined with leadership gained from medical directorships of important sports organizations to us. Dr. Di Pasquale has written over a dozen books on athletic performance, focusing mainly on diet and supplementation, most notably his books,The Anabolic Diet andThe Metabolic Diet . He has received an Honors M.D., Honors B.Sc. (majoring in genetics and molecular biochemistry), both from the University of Toronto. He has also published 1,000 articles in magazines such asMuscle & Fitness ,Flex andPowerlifting USA .

Dr. Roscoe M. Moore, Jr.– Chief Scientific Director. A Former U.S. Assistant Surgeon General, Dr. Moore served with the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and was for the last 12 years of his career there the principal person responsible for global development support within the Office of the Secretary, HHS, with primary emphasis on Continental Africa and other less developed countries of the world. He was the principal liaison person between the HHS and Ministries of Health in Africa with regard to the development of infrastructure and technical support for the delivery of preventive and curative health needs for the continent. Dr. Moore received his undergraduate and Doctor of Veterinary Medicine degrees from Tuskegee Institute; his Master of Public Health degree in Epidemiology from the University of Michigan; and his Doctor of Philosophy degree in Epidemiology from the Johns Hopkins University. He was awarded the Doctor of Science degree (Honoris Causa) in recognition of his distinguished public health career by Tuskegee University. Dr. Moore was a career officer within the Commissioned Corps of the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) entering with the U.S. National Institutes of Health and rising to the rank of Assistant United States Surgeon General (Rear Admiral, USPHS) within the Immediate Office of the Secretary, HHS. He was selected as Chief Veterinary Medical Officer, USPHS, by Surgeon General C. Everett Koop.

Dr. Phillip Frost– Member of MusclePharm Scientific Advisory Board. Dr. Frost has served as the CEO and Chairman of OPKO Health, Inc. since on March 27, 2007. Dr. Frost was named the Chairman of the Board of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Limited, or Teva, (NYSE:TEVA) in March 2010 and had previously been Vice Chairman since January 2006 when Teva acquired IVAX Corporation, or IVAX. Dr. Frost had served as Chairman of the Board of Directors andsince March 15, 2016. Mr. Drexler has served as Chairman of our Board of Directors since August 26, 2015. Mr. Drexler is currently the Chief Executive Officer of IVAX Corporation since 1987. He was ChairmanConsac, LLC (“Consac”), a privately held firm that invests in the securities of publicly-traded and venture-stage companies. Previously, Mr. Drexler served as President of Country Life Vitamins, a family-owned nutritional supplements and natural products company that he joined in 1993. In addition to developing strategic objectives and overseeing acquisitions for Country Life, Mr. Drexler created new brands that include the DepartmentBioChem family of Dermatology at Mt. Sinai Medical Centersports and fitness nutrition products. Mr. Drexler negotiated and led the process which resulted in the sale of Greater Miami, Miami Beach, FloridaCountry Life in 2007 to the Japanese conglomerate Kikkoman Corp. Mr. Drexler graduated from 1972Northeastern University, where he earned a B.A. in political science. Because of his experience in running and developing nutritional supplement companies, we believe that Mr. Drexler is well qualified to 1986. Dr. Frost was Chairman of theserve on our Board of Directors of Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 1972 until the acquisition of Key Pharmaceuticals by Schering Plough Corporation in 1986. Dr. FrostDirectors.

Sabina Rizvi

Sabina Rizvi was named Chairman of the Board of Ladenburg Thalmannappointed to serve as our President and Chief Financial Services Inc. (NYSE Amex:LTS), an investment banking, asset management, and securities brokerage firm providing services through its principal operating subsidiary, Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., in July 2006 and has been a director of Ladenburg Thalmann from 2001 until 2002 and again since 2004. Dr. Frost also serves as Chairman of the board of directors of PROLOR Biotech, Inc. (NYSE Amex: PBTH), a development stage biopharmaceutical company. He servesOfficer on April 5, 2021. Subsequently, she was appointed as a member of the Board of TrusteesDirectors on June 9, 2022. Previously, Ms. Rizvi held multiple C-suite roles at Yum! Brands, with increasing responsibility including CFO of the Canadian and Thailand business units and President and General Manager of Pizza Hut Thailand, where she oversaw significant growth of the brand. Most recently, she was Chief Operating Officer, Yum! Digital and Technology, playing an instrumental role in leveraging technology to transform the customer experience. Ms. Rizvi graduated from University of MiamiWindsor, Canada with a Master of Business Administration and completed her Honors Bachelor of Mathematics from University of Waterloo, Canada.

Michael Heller

Michael Heller joined our Board of Directors as a Trustee of eachan independent director in January 2021 and is chair of the Scripps Research Institute, the Miami Jewish Home for the Aged, and the Mount Sinai Medical Center. Dr. Frost is also a director of Castle Brands (NYSE Amex:ROX), a developer and marketer of premium brand spirits. Dr. Frost previously served as a director for Continucare Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corp., Ideation Acquisition Corp., Protalix Bio Therapeutics, Inc., and SafeStitch Medical Inc., and as Governor and Co-Vice-Chairman of the American Stock Exchange (now NYSE Amex).

Dr. Frost has successfully founded several pharmaceutical companies and overseen the development and commercialization of a multitude of pharmaceutical products. This combined with his experience as a physician and chairman and/or chief executive officer of large pharmaceutical companies has given him insight into virtually every facet of the pharmaceutical business and drug development and commercialization process. He is a demonstrated leader with keen business understanding and is uniquely positioned to help guide our Company through its transition from a development stage company into a successful, multinational biopharmaceutical and diagnostics company.

Dr. Richard Ogden (CSCS) – Medical Advisor. Dr. Odgen’s career in clinical research and development spans nearly 40 years. After earning a Ph.D. from Cambridge University, his career started with postdoctoral research studying ribonucleic acid transcription and processing. Following that, he undertook independent research, funded by the National Science Foundation. In 1984, he joined Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as one of its founding scientists. Following Agouron’s merger with Pfizer, he served as a Senior Director and was the scientific liaison for the Agouron/Pfizer commercial and corporate organizations. In 2006, Dr. Ogden, co-founded RORR Inc., a medical, scientific consulting and education company with clients in the U.S. and Europe. In addition to publication in numerous medical journals, he is co-editor of two books relating to AIDS therapy.

Dr. Michael R. Stevens– Director of Therapeutic Nutrition. Dr. Stevens has over 20 years of well-diversified experience in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Stevens spent 17 years at Bristol-Myers Squibb, where he held positions of increasing responsibility in the areas of Market Research (Oncology and HIV), Marketing (Oncology), and Medical Affairs (HIV). In addition served asCompensation Committee, a member of the Executive Council for the Forum for Collaborative HIV Research — a public-private partnership facilitating discussion on emerging issues in HIV clinical researchAudit Committee and working to translate research results into patient care. He has also served on 15 Protocol Committees within the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG). Michael received his B.S. Pharmacy and Doctor of Pharmacy degrees from Purdue University.

Dr. Ron Sekura –Director of Therapeutic Research. Dr. Sekura is the former ChiefChair of the PharmaceuticalNominating & Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Heller is Principal of Talent Resources Holdings since January 2020, a global digital marketing agency recognized as a leader in developing and Regulatory Affairs Branchproducing influencer based social media campaigns, providing holistic marketing solutions to brands and full service, social platform management to talent and businesses. Mr. Heller was the founder and has been Chief Executive Officer of Talent Resources since January 2005. Mr. Heller holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from the Gallatin School of Individualized Study at New York University, and a Juris Doctor from Cardozo School of Law. Because of his significant marketing perspective and experience with expanding brand awareness, we believe that Mr. Heller is well qualified to serve on our Board of Directors.

Paul Karr

Paul Karr joined our Board of Directors as an independent director on June 1, 2021. Mr. Karr serves as Chairman of the Division of AIDS at The National Institute of AllergyAudit Committee and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the National Institute of Health (NIH) as well as a former Research Chemist at The National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) at the NIH and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). He received his Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Biochemistry degrees at Pennsylvania State University and his PhD at Cornell University. Dr. Sekura is the author of over 60 scientific publications.

Mariel Selbovitz– Director of Global Therapeutics Product Procurement Development. Ms. Selbovitz is a graduate of Cornell University and received her Master’s in Public Health at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Health. She worked as the Client Intake Specialist at Positive Health Project and Syringe Exchange Program Coordinator at the Foundation for Research on Sexually Transmitted Diseases and is a partner in BioEquity Partners. Selbovitz is a member of the Cornell AIDS Clinical Trials Group Community AdvisoryCompensation and Nominating and Governance Committees. Mr. Karr is a Certified Public Accountant and consults with middle market firms as a Director with CFO Consulting Partners, a position he has held since August 2018. Prior to that, he served at AIG as Deputy Corporate Controller from September 2014 to July 2016 and North America Controller, Property Casualty from November 2012 to September 2014. His experience includes senior leadership roles in finance and controllership, addressing financial reporting, issue resolution and internal controls also includes American Express, General Electric, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. He has served on the Board of Directors of LG Nortel, a $500 million joint venture in Korea, and AIDS Treatment Advocacy Coalition.has worked with numerous audit committees and boards. Mr. Karr began his career at Deloitte & Touche where he was an audit partner in the Chicago and National offices. He has degrees in Accountancy – BS (High Honors) and Master of Accounting Science – from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Based on his experience in accounting, financial reporting and auditing matters, we believe Mr. Karr is well qualified to serve on our Board of Directors

49

James Sapirstein, R.Ph.Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of our executive officers or directors.

Arrangements between Officers and Directors

Except as set forth herein, to our knowledge, there is no arrangement or understanding between any of our officers or directors and any other person pursuant to which the officer or director was selected to serve as an officer or director.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

We are not aware of any of our directors or officers being involved in any legal proceedings in the past ten years relating to any matters in bankruptcy, insolvency, criminal proceedings (other than traffic and other minor offenses), MBA – Strategic Advisor.or being subject to any of the items set forth under Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K.

Code Of Business Ethics Mr. Sapirstein has been

Our Board of Directors established a Code of Business Ethics applicable to our officers and employees. The Code of Business Ethics is accessible on our website at www.musclepharmcorp.com. If we make any substantive amendments to the Code of Conduct or grant any waiver, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Conduct to our officers, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website or in a current report on Form 8-K.

Corporate Governance Overview

Our business, assets and operations are managed under the direction of our Board of Directors. Members of our Board of Directors are kept informed of our business through discussions with our Chief Executive Officer, our external counsel, members of Alliqua Inc. since October 2012. He was the Presidentmanagement and Chief Executive Officer of Tobira Therapeutics, Inc., or Tobira, from August 2007 through April 2011other Company employees as well as our independent auditors, and founded Tobiraby reviewing materials provided to them and participating in October 2006. Prior to Tobira, Mr. Sapirstein worked at Paramount BioCapital from May 2005 to September 2006 in the company creation group. Mr. Sapirstein was the Executive Vice President of the Metabolic and Endocrinology Business Unit from 2002 through April 2005. Mr. Sapirstein was the Director of Global Marketing at Gilead Sciences from July 2000 through May 2002, where he was responsible for the global launch of Viread® . He was the head of the international infectious disease marketing teams during his time at Bristol-Myers Squibb from August 1996 to July 2000. Mr. Sapirstein was with Hoffmann-LaRoche from October 1987 to July 1996, where he worked in a variety of capacities ranging from marketing and sales positions to international posts. Prior to working at Hoffmann LaRoche, he worked at Eli Lilly and Company in a sales capacity from June 1984 to October 1987. Mr. Sapirstein earned his Bachelor of Science in Pharmacy from the Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy at Rutgers University and an MBA from Farleigh Dickinson University.

Michael Kim, D.O. – Executive Director of Medicine, Research and Education. Dr. Kim has been our Executive Director of Medicine, Research and Education since August 2011. He oversees our research. He analyzes formulations, research protocols and strength and performance protocols. He also advises our athlete endorsers regarding nutrient, diet and supplementation. He received a B.A. in Economics from University of California – Davis, and a Doctor of Osteopathy degree from Touro University.

Corporate Governance

Director Independence

Each director and named executive officer is obligated to disclose, on an annual basis, any transactions with our Company and any of its subsidiaries in which a director or executive officer, or any member of his or her immediate family, have a direct or indirect material interest. Following completion of these disclosures, our board of directors make a determination as to the independence of each director using the current standards for “independence” that satisfy both the criteria for the NASDAQ Stock Market and the NYSE MKT.

As of November 5, 2012, our board of directors conducted an annual review and affirmatively determined that Messrs. Doron, Greenwell and Prosser are “independent” as that term is defined in the NASDAQ listing standards.

Committees of the Board

During 2012, our board of directors held nine meetings. Each director attended at least 75% of the meetings (held during the period that such director served) of the Board of Directors and its committees.

Our corporate governance program features the committees on which such director served in 2012.following:

a Board of Directors that is nominated for election annually;
Charters for each of the Boards committees, which clearly establish the roles and responsibilities of each such committee;
regular executive sessions among our non-employee and independent directors;
a Board of Directors that enjoys unrestricted access to our management, employees and professional advisers;
a Code of Conduct, Insider Trading Policy, Corporate Communications Policy and Corporate Governance Guidelines; and
no board member is serving on an excessive number of public company boards.

In addition, the board acts from time to time by unanimous written consent in lieu of holding a meeting. During 2012, the board effected several actions by unanimous written consent. Members of our board are encouraged to attend our annual meeting of shareholders.

The following table sets forth the three standing committees of our board and the members of each committee and the number of meetings held by our board and the committees during 2012:

Director Board Audit
Committee
 Compensation
Committee
 Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee
 
Brad J. Pyatt Co-Chair       
John H. Bluher Co-Chair       
Michael J. Doron X X X Chair 
James J. Greenwell X X Chair X 
Donald W. Prosser X Chair* X X 
Cory J. Gregory(1) X       
Mark E. Groussman(2) X X X X 
Gordon G. Burr(3) X X X X 
Meetings in 2012: 9 2 3 1 
50
 *Audit Committee Financial Expert.  
(1)Mr. Gregory resigned from the board of directors on July 19, 2012.  
(2)Mr. Groussman resigned from the board of directors on October 18, 2012.
(3)Mr. Burr resigned from the board of directors on November 5, 2012  

To assist it in carrying out its duties, the boardBoard Committees

Our Board of Directors has delegated certain authority toestablished an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and& Corporate Governance Committee asand, each of which have the functions of each arecomposition and responsibilities described below.

Committee

Messrs. Doron, Greenwell and Prosser Members serve on these committees until their resignations or until otherwise determined by our Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee’s main function is to oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes, internal systemsBoard of control, independent auditor relationships and the auditsDirectors. The Board of our financial statements. The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include:

·selecting, hiring, and compensating our independent auditors;

·evaluating the qualifications, independence and performance of our independent auditors;

·overseeing and monitoring the integrity of our financial statements and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate to financial statements or accounting matters;

·approving the audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditor;

·reviewing with the independent auditor the design, implementation, adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls and our critical accounting policies; and

·preparing the report that the SEC requires in our annual proxy statement.

The board of directors has adopted an Audit Committee Charter. The Audit Committee members meet NASDAQ’s financial literacy requirements, and the boardDirectors has further determined that Mr. Prosser (i) isMessrs. Karr and Heller, chair and member, respectively, of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, are each an “audit committee financial expert”“Audit Committee Financial Expert,” as such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC, by virtue of their relevant experience listed in their respective biographical summaries provided above in the section entitled “Executive Officers and (ii) also meets NASDAQ’s financial sophistication requirements.

Directors.” Each of our committees have a written charter. Current copies of the Charters of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee are available on our website at www.musclepharmcorp.com/MSLP/corporate_governance. As necessary, the Board of Directors may establish special committees to address issues not directly under the governance of the established committees.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee reviews the work of our internal accounting and audit processes and the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The Audit Committee has sole authority for the appointment, and oversight of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and to approve any significant non-audit relationship with the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The Audit Committee is also responsible for preparing the report required by the rules of the SEC to be included in our annual proxy statement. The Audit Committee is currently comprised of Mr. Heller and Mr. Karr. The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Karr is an “Audit Committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 407 of Regulation S-K. Additionally, Mr. Karr serves as chair of the Audit Committee. Each of Messrs. Doron, GreenwellKarr and Prosser serveHeller are independent for Audit Committee purposes, as determined under Exchange Act rules. Mr. Heller joined the Audit Committee in January 2021 and Mr. Karr joined the Audit Committee in June 2021. During 2021, the Audit Committee held four meetings.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee approves our goals and objectives relevant to compensation, stays informed as to market levels of compensation and, based on evaluations submitted by management, recommends to our Board of Directors compensation levels and systems for the Board of Directors and our officers that correspond to our goals and objectives. The Compensation Committee also produces an annual report on executive compensation for inclusion in our proxy statement. The Compensation Committee is currently comprised of Mr. Heller, as chair, and Mr. Karr, as a member. Mr. Karr joined the Compensation Committee.Committee in June 2021 and Mr. Heller joined in January 2021.

Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending to our Board of Directors individuals to be nominated as directors and committee members. This includes evaluation of new candidates as well as evaluation of current directors. In evaluating the current directors, the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee conducted a thorough self-evaluation process, which included the use of questionnaires and a third-party expert that interviewed each of the directors and provided an analysis of the results of the interviews to the committee. This committee is also responsible for developing and recommending to the Board of Directors our corporate governance guidelines, as well as reviewing and recommending revisions to the guidelines on a regular basis. The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee is currently comprised of Mr. Karr as a member and Mr. Heller, as the chair. During 2021 the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee held no meetings.

51

Board of Directors Role in Risk Management

The Board of Directors oversees an enterprise-wide approach to risk management, designed to support the achievement of organizational objectives, including strategic objectives, to improve long-term organizational performance and enhance stockholder value. Risk management includes not only understanding company specific risks and the steps management implements to manage those risks, but also the level of risk acceptable and appropriate for us. Management is responsible for establishing our business strategy, identifying and assessing the related risks and implementing appropriate risk management practices. Our Board of Directors reviews our business strategy and management’s assessment of the related risk and discusses with management the appropriate level of risk for us. For example, the Board of Directors meets with management at least quarterly to review, advise and direct management with respect to strategic business risks, risks related to our new product development and financial risks, among others. The Board of Directors also delegates oversight to Board committees to oversee selected elements of risk.

The Audit Committee oversees financial risk exposures, including monitoring the integrity of our financial statements, internal controls over financial reporting, and the independence of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The Audit Committee reviews periodic internal controls and related assessments from our finance department. The Audit Committee also assists the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibility with respect to compliance matters and meets at least quarterly with our finance department, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and internal or external legal counsel to discuss risks related to our financial reporting function. In addition, the Audit Committee ensures that our business is conducted with the highest standards of ethical conduct in compliance with applicable laws and regulations by monitoring our Code of Business Conduct and our Corporate Compliance Hotline, and the Audit Committee discusses other risk assessment and our risk management policies periodically with management.

The Compensation Committee’s main functionsCommittee participates in the design of the compensation program and helps create incentives that do not encourage a level of risk-taking behavior that is inconsistent with our business strategy.

The Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee oversees governance-related risks by working with management to establish corporate governance guidelines applicable to us, and making recommendations regarding director nominees, the determination of director independence, Board of Directors leadership structure and membership on Board committees.

52

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Overview

We are assisting our boardeligible to take advantage of directorsthe rules applicable to a “smaller reporting company,” as defined in discharging its responsibilities relatingthe Exchange Act, for the three months ended March 31, 2022. As a “smaller reporting company” we are permitted, and have opted, to comply with the scaled back executive compensation disclosure rules applicable to a “smaller reporting company” under the Exchange Act. Only three individuals served as executive officers, as defined in Rule 3b-7 under the Exchange Act, during the three months ended March 31, 2022. The following discussion relates to the compensation of outside directors, the Chief Executive Officer and otherthose executive officers, who we refer to as well as administering any stock incentive plans we may adopt. The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities includeour “named executive officers” or “NEOs” in this prospectus. During the following:three months ended March 31, 2022, our NEOs were:

·reviewing and recommending to our board of directors the compensation of ourRyan Drexler – Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers,Chairman of the Board of Directors
Sabina Rizvi – President and the outside directors;Chief Financial Officer

·conducting a performance review of our Chief Executive Officer;

·reviewing our compensation policies; and

·if required, preparing the report of the Compensation Committee for inclusion in our annual proxy statement.

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain talented executives that will drive Company growth and create long-term shareholder value. The board of directors has adopted a Compensation Committee Charter.

The Compensation Committee’s policy is to offeroversees and administers our executive officers competitive compensation packages that will permit us to attractprogram, with input and retain highly qualified individuals and to motivate and reward these individuals in an appropriate fashion aligned with the long-term interests of our Company and our stockholders.

Compensation Committee Risk Assessment . We have assessed our compensation programs and concluded that our compensation practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Messrs. Doron, Greenwell and Prosser serve on our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s responsibilities include:

·identify qualified individuals to serve as members of the Company’s board of directors;

·review the qualifications and performance of incumbent directors;

·review and consider candidates who may be suggested by any director or executive officer or by any stockholder of the Company;

·review considerations relating to board composition, including size of the board, term and age limits, and the criteria for membership on the board;

·review and recommend corporate governance policies; and

·monitor, oversee and review compliance with the Company’s code of ethics.

The board of directors has adopted a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter.

Corporate Governance Materials

The full text of the charters of our Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Compensation Committees and our Business Conduct and Code of Ethics can be found at www.musclepharm.com. Copies of these documents also may be obtainedrecommendations from our Corporate Secretary.Chief Executive Officer.

BoardElements of Directors DiversityExecutive Compensation

The board does not have a formal diversity policy. The board considers candidates that will make the board as a whole reflective of a range of talents, skills, diversityOur executive compensation program has three main components: base salary, cash bonuses and expertise.

Code of Ethics

incentive equity awards. Our board of directors has adopted a Code of Ethics (“Code of Ethics”), which provides general statements of our expectations regarding ethical standards that we expect our directors, officers and employees to adhere to while acting on our behalf. Among other things, the Code of Ethics provides that:

·We will comply with all laws, rules and regulations;
·Our directors, officers, and employees are to avoid conflicts of interest and are prohibited from competing with the Company or personally exploiting our corporate opportunities;
·Our directors, officers, and employees are to protect our assets and maintain our confidentiality;
·We are committed to promoting values of integrity and fair dealing; and
·We are committed to accurately maintaining our accounting records under generally accepted accounting principles and timely filing our periodic reports and tax returns.

Our Code of Ethics also contains procedures for employees to report, anonymously or otherwise, violations of the Code of Ethics.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, requires the Company’s directors and named executive officers also receive employee benefits that are made available to our salaried employees generally, are eligible to receive certain compensation and persons who beneficially own more than ten percentbenefits in connection with a change in control or termination of our common stock, to fileemployment, and receive certain perquisites, in each case, as described below.

Base Salary

The Compensation Committee determines the initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and our other equity securities with the SEC. As a practical matter, the Company assists its directors and officers by monitoring transactions and completing and filing Section 16 reports on their behalf. Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms in our possession and on written representations from reporting persons, we believe that during 2012 allbase salary for each of our named executive officers and directors filedeach year determines whether to approve any base salary adjustments based upon the required reports on a timely basis under Section 16(a)Company’s performance, the named executive officer’s individual performance, changes in duties and responsibilities of the Exchange Act, except that one Form 3 was filed for Mr. Burr on November 9, 2012named executive officer and the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer (other than with respect to becominghis own base salary).

Cash Bonuses

Pursuant to their employment agreements, each of our named executive officers was eligible to earn a directorcash bonus, with a target amount established by the Compensation Committee, based on July 19, 2012; one Form 4the achievement of specified performance goals. Mr. Drexler was filedeligible to receive cash bonuses of up to $0.4 million based on the achievement of specified performance goals. See below for cash bonus amounts set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” below.

Incentive Equity Awards

Incentive equity awards granted by the Company have historically been in the form of restricted stock awards. The Company also has granted stock options from time to time. The Compensation Committee believes that equity-based awards can be an effective retention tool that also align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. In 2020, none of our named executive officers were granted equity-based awards.

Employment Agreements

We maintained employment agreements with Mr. BurrDrexler and Ms. Rizvi. that include certain severance and change in control payments. These agreements are described under “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table” below.

53

Employee Benefit Plans and Perquisites

We maintain a 401(k) Savings/Retirement Plan for eligible employees of the Company and certain affiliates, including our named executive officers. The 401(k) Plan permits eligible employees to defer up to the maximum dollar amount allowed by law. The employee’s elective deferrals are immediately vested upon contribution to the 401(k) Plan. We currently make discretionary matching contributions to the 401(k) Plan in an amount equal to 100% of each eligible employee’s deferrals up to 4% of his or her qualifying compensation, subject to a total employer contribution maximum of $19,000 and limits imposed by applicable law. We do not maintain any other defined benefit, defined contribution or deferred compensation plans for our employees.

Our named executive officers are eligible to participate in all of our employee benefit plans, such as medical, dental, vision, group life and disability insurance, in each case on November 9, 2012the same basis as other employees, subject to applicable law. We also provide vacation and other paid holidays to all employees, including our executive officers. In addition, we provide certain highly-compensated employees, including our named executive officers, with respect to transactions occurring on September 17, 2012 one Form 4 was filed for Mr. Bluher on November 20, 2012 with respect to transactions occurring on August 15, 2012;life insurance and one Form 4 was filed for Mr. Bluher on November 20, 2012 with respect to transactions occurring on September 26, 2012.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

supplemental long-term disability coverage. We also provide certain perquisites, as described and quantified in the Summary Compensation Table for 2012below under “All Other Compensation.”

Summary Compensation Table

The following summary compensation tables sets forth all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each person serving as a named executive officer of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2012.

Name and Principal Position Year Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock Awards (1)
($)
  Option Awards (1)
($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 
                     
Brad J. Pyatt 2012  322,022   160,000   -   -   8,514   490,536 
Chief Executive Officer and 2011  250,000   140,099(2)  1,400,995(2) (3)   -   4,308(5)  1,795,402 
President 2010  194,821   -   2,650,000(4)  -   -   2,844,821 
                           
L. Gary Davis 2012  65,000   75,000   204,500(6)  -   -   344,500 
Chief Financial Officer                          
                           
John H. Bluher 2012  182,292   130,000   678,000(6)  -   -   990,292 
Executive Vice President and COO 2011  36,458   50,000   -   -   -   86,458 
                           
Jeremy R. DeLuca 2012  187,500   130,000   -   -   7,000(9)  324,500 
Executive Vice President and CMO 2011  65,833   140,099(7)  1,400,995(8)  -   -   1,606,927 
                           
Cory J. Gregory 2012  201,796   130,000   -   -   -   331,796 
Executive Vice President 2011  150,000   140,099(10)  1,400,995(10)(11)  -   -   1,691,094 
  2010  78,892   -   2,650,000(12)  -   -   2,728,892 

(1)Amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of each stock award is measured based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.
(2)Reflects the amount returned to the Company in July 2012 as a result of restated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. Mr. Pyatt voluntarily returned (i) $30,311 of his cash bonus and (ii) $303,109 worth of his stock bonus (equal to a total of 31,009 shares of common stock).
(3)Mr. Pyatt received a stock award of $1,704,104, equal to 174,333 shares of common stock, at a price per share of $9.78, which was the closing price of our common stock on February 1, 2012, the date of grant.
(4)Mr. Pyatt received a stock award of 5,883 shares of common stock at a price per share of $450.45, which was the closing price of our common stock on October 18, 2010, the date of grant.
(5)Amount represents private golf club membership dues of $8,514 and $4,308 for 2012 and 2011, respectively.
(6)Reflects the full grant date fair value of restricted stock unit award granted in 2012 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 based on the closing price of the common stock of $3.48 and $9.61 (after adjustment for the reverse split of 1-for-850) on the date of grant.
(7)Reflects the amount returned to the Company in July 2012 as a result of restated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. Mr. DeLuca voluntarily returned (i) $30,311 of his cash bonus (which had not yet been paid to him) and (ii) $303,109 worth of his stock bonus (equal to a total of 31,009 shares of common stock).
(8)Mr. DeLuca received a stock award of $1,704,104, equal to 174,333 shares of common stock, at a price per share of $9.78, which was the closing price of our common stock on February 1, 2012, the date of grant.
(9)Amount represents private golf club membership dues of $7,000 for 2012.
(10)Reflects the amount returned to the Company in July 2012 as a result of restated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. Mr. Gregory voluntarily returned (i) $30,311 of his cash bonus and (ii) $303,109 worth of his stock bonus (equal to a total of 31,009 shares of common stock).
(11)Mr. Gregory received a stock award of $1,704,104, equal to 174,333 shares of common stock, at a price per share of $9.78, which was the closing price of our common stock on February 1, 2012, the date of grant.
(12)Mr. Gregory received a stock award of 5,883 shares of common stock at a price per share of $450.45, which was the closing price of our common stock on October 18, 2010, the date of grant.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Year End

The following table provides information concerning the holdings of stock option and restricted stock unit awards by our named executive officers for 2021 and 2020, in respect of their employment with the Company.

Name and Principal Position Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)
  Option Awards ($)  All Other Compensation ($) (4)  Total ($) 
                      
Ryan Drexler (1) (4) 2021  $1,166,667   416,667       -   -   56,483  $1,639,817 
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board 2020  $750,000   -   -   -   984  $750,984 
                            
Sabina Rizvi (2) (3) 2021  $315,341   -   -   724,393      $1,039,734 
President and Chief Financial Officer 2020  $-   -   -   -   -  $- 
                            
Allen Sciarillo 2021  $94,019   25,000   -   -   -  $119,019 
  2020  $194,167   50,000   -   -   6,501  $250,668 
                            
Brian Casutto 2021  $-   -   -   -   -  $- 
Executive Vice President of Sales and Operations 2020  $151,587   -   -   -   162,384  $313,971 

(1)For information regarding certain transactions between Mr. Drexler and the Company, see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements. Mr. Drexler’s 2021 bonus included the payout $217,000 of deferred compensation in 2021.
(2)Sabina Rizvi was appointed to serve as President and Chief Financial Officer in April 2021.
(3)Relates to the fair value of options issued to Sabina Rizvi under the 2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (“2021 Plan”).
(4)The Board of Directors approved $49,483 for Mr. Drexler’s moving expenses as well as $7,000 per month for rental home until home purchase.
(5)Amounts under All Other Compensation for 2021 include employee benefits and certain perquisites, as described above.

Employment Agreements

As used below, the terms “without cause,” “good reason,” “qualifying sale,” “aggregate purchase price,” “performance bonus,” “cash-based incentives,” and “change in control” are defined in the applicable agreements.

54

Mr. Drexler

We entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Drexler on February 11, 2016, which has subsequently been amended and restated, most recently effective as of December 31, 2012. This table includes unexercised (both vestedFebruary 1, 2019. Subject to earlier termination as provided therein, the term of his agreement runs through February 1, 2021 and unvested) stock option awards and unvested restricted stock unit awards with vesting conditions that were automatically renews for successive one-year terms thereafter, unless either party provides at least three months’ written notice of its or his intention not satisfied as of December 31, 2012. Each equity grant is shown separately for each named executive officer. The vesting schedule for each outstanding equity award is shown in the footnotes following this table.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Year End
    Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name Grant Date Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock that
Have Not
Vested (1)
(#)
  Market Value of
Shares or Units
of Stock that
Have Not
Vested (2)
($) 
 
                     
Brad J. Pyatt -  -   -   -   -   -   - 
                           
L. Gary Davis 11/16/2012  -   -   -   -   58,824   250,002 
                           
John H. Bluher 11/16/2012  -   -   -   -   70,589   300,003 
                           
Jeremy R. DeLuca -  -   -   -   -   -   - 
                           
Cory J. Gregory -  -   -   -   -   -   - 

(1)The table below shows the vesting dates for the respective unvested restricted stock units listed in the above Outstanding Equity Awards at Year-End for 2012 Table:

Vesting Date Mr. Davis  Mr. Bluher 
01/01/2013  19,608   23,530 
01/01/2014  19,608   23,530 
12/01/2014  19,608   23,529 

(2)Market value of the restricted stock units represents the product of the closing price of our common stock as of December 31, 2012 (the last trading day of the year), which was $4.25, and the number of shares underlying each such award.

Employment Arrangements

On October 18, 2012, and amended on January 4, 2013 to reduce therenew. Under his employment agreement, Mr. Drexler was entitled to a base salary of $700,000 for 2019, which was increased to $750,000 per year effective January 1, 2020, in each executive officer atcase, subject to increase by the requestboard. For 2019, Mr. Drexler was eligible to receive cash-based incentives of such executive officer,up to $250,000 based on the Company entered intoachievement of specified performance goals. There was no specified performance goal in 2020. Under his amended and restated employment agreements (except foragreement, Mr. Davis, which was an initial employment agreement) with the following executive officers of the Company, which include its principal executive officer, principal financial officer and other named executive officers:

NamePosition
Brad J. PyattChief Executive Officer and President
L. Gary DavisChief Financial Officer
John H. BluherExecutive Vice President – Chief Operating Officer
Jeremy R. DeLucaExecutive Vice President – Chief Marketing Officer
Cory J. GregoryExecutive Vice President

The employment agreements were executed based upon a form employment agreement approved by the Compensation Committee of the board. The employment agreements are for an initial term ending December 31, 2014. However, the employment agreements entered into with Mr. Pyatt and Mr. DeLuca provide for an initial term ending December 31, 2015.

Under the terms of the employment agreements, each officer will receive an annual base salary in the amount set forth below, subject to any increase the Compensation Committee may deem appropriate from time to time.

Name Annual
Base Salary
 
    
Brad J. Pyatt $250,000 
L. Gary Davis $130,000 
John H. Bluher $200,000 
Jeremy R. DeLuca $225,000 
Cory J. Gregory $130,000 

In addition, the officers will be Drexler is also eligible to receive oneadditional cash-based incentives of up to $350,000, based on the achievement of specified performance goals.

Concurrently with entering into the amended and restated employment agreement in February 2018, We entered into a transaction bonus agreement with Mr. Drexler, which provides that, upon the occurrence of a qualifying sale, and provided that at the time of the qualifying sale Mr. Drexler is an owner of at least 20% of our shares, Mr. Drexler will be entitled to a transaction bonus equal to 10% of the aggregate purchase price if such price is in excess of $50 million. Mr. Drexler is entitled to this transaction bonus regardless of whether the qualifying transaction occurs during his employment or more annual cash bonuses and grants of stock options, restricted stock or other equity-related awards from the Company’s various equity compensation plans, as determined by the Compensation Committee.at any time thereafter.

If theMr. Drexler’s employment of an officer is terminated duefor any reason, each equity award granted to him will fully vest and he will be entitled to any unpaid performance bonus or cash-based incentives (as described above), to the officer’s death or inability to perform, the employment agreements provide for payment to the officerextent earned as of any unpaid portion of the Officer’s base salary and benefits accrued through the date of deathsuch termination, in addition to any amounts required by law or inabilityour policies. In addition, if Mr. Drexler’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by Mr. Drexler for good reason prior to perform and, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee,(but not in connection with) a bonus. The officer or his representativesqualifying sale, Mr. Drexler will also be entitled to receive a reimbursement(i) 12 months of base salary continuation, (ii) up to 12 months of Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act, orsubsidized COBRA premiums, ifand (iii) a lump sum payment of the officer orperformance bonus for the year his representatives timely elect and remain eligible for COBRA.employment terminates. If the officer’sMr. Drexler’s employment is terminated dueby us without cause or by Mr. Drexler for good reason within 12 months following (or prior to, inability to perform, the officerbut in connection with or anticipation of) a qualifying sale, Mr. Drexler will also be entitled to receive, in lieu of the amounts described in the preceding sentence, (i) a lump sum payment equal to the greater200% of (A) the target bonus payable to the Officer for the year in which the date of termination occurs or if no target bonus has been set, the officer’s most recenthis annual bonus, and (B) a bonus for such year as may be determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion; and (ii) a severance payment (payable over six months) equal to six months of the officer’s base salary, in effect as(ii) up to 18 months’ of the date of termination.

If the officer’s employment is terminated for “cause” or if an Officer terminates his employment without “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the employment agreement), the officer will not be entitled to a severance payment or any other termination benefits. However, the Company will pay the officer any unpaid portion of the officer’s base salarysubsidized COBRA premiums, and benefits accrued through the date of such termination.

Upon a termination of an officer’s employment (except for Mr. Pyatt) by the Company without cause and without a change in control or by the officer for good reason without a change in control, the employment agreements provide that such officer will be entitled to (i) any unpaid portion of the officer’s base salary and benefits accrued through the date of termination; (ii) an amount payable over three months and equal to the lesser of (A) nine months of the officer’s base salary in effect as of the date of termination, or (B) the officer’s base salary remaining under the term of his employment agreement; (iii) a lump sum payment equal to 25%200% of the officer’s targetperformance bonus (or if no target bonus has been set,for the Officer’s most recent annual bonus) if the termination is between January 1 and June 30 or 50% of the Officer’s target bonus (or if no target bonus has been set, the Officer’s most recent annual bonus) if the termination is between July 1 and December 31; (iv) acceleration of the officer’s outstanding equity awards, unless otherwise provided in the equity award agreement for a particular equity award; and (v) the officer will also be entitledyear his employment terminates. The severance payable to receive a reimbursement of up to 12 months of COBRA premiums, if the officer timely elects and remains eligible for COBRA.

UponMr. Drexler on a termination of Mr. Pyatt’shis employment by the Companyus without cause and without a change in control or by Mr. PyattDrexler for good reason withoutis subject to his execution (and non-revocation) of a changerelease of claims in control, Mr. Pyatt’s employment agreement provides that he will be entitled to (i) any unpaid portion of his base salary and benefits accrued through the date of termination; (ii) an amount payable over three months and equal to two times his base salary on the date of termination; (iii) a lump sum payment equal to the greater of (A) two times his target bonus for the for the year in which the date of termination occurs or if no target bonus has been set, then two times Mr. Pyatt’s most recent annual bonus, and (B) a bonus for such year as may be determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion; (iv) acceleration of his outstanding equity awards, unless otherwise provided in the equity award agreement for a particular equity award; and (v) he will also be entitled to receive a reimbursement of up to 12 months of COBRA premiums, if he timely elects and remains eligible for COBRA.our favor.

Upon a termination of an officer’s employment (except for Mr. Pyatt) by the Company without cause and with a change in control or by the officer for good reason after a change in control,Under the employment agreement, provides that such officer will be entitled to (i) any unpaid portion of the officer’s base salary and benefits accrued through the date of termination; (ii) a severance payment (payable over 12 months) equal to 12 months of the officer’s base salary in effect as of the date of termination; (iii) a lump sum payment equal to the greater of (A) 100% of the officer’s target bonus in the year of termination or if no target bonus has been set, then 100% of the officer’s most recent annual bonus, and (B) a bonus for such year as may be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion; (iv) a severance payment of $500,000 (payable within 30 days of the date of termination); (v) acceleration of the officer’s outstanding equity awards; and (vi) the officer will also be entitled to receive a reimbursement of up to 12 months of COBRA premiums, if the officer timely elects and remains eligible for COBRA.

Upon a termination of Mr. Pyatt’s employment by the Company without cause and with a change in control or by Mr. Pyatt for good reason after a change in control, Mr. Pyatt’s employment agreement provides that he will be entitled to (i) any unpaid portion of his base salary and benefits accrued through the date of termination; (ii) a severance payment (payable over 12 months) equal to three times his base salary in effect as of the date of termination; (iii) a severance payment of $2 million (payable within 30 days of the date of termination); (v) acceleration of Mr. Pyatt’s outstanding equity awards; and (vi) he will also be entitled to receive a reimbursement of up to 12 months of COBRA premiums, if he timely elects and remains eligible for COBRA.

The employment agreements also contain customary confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation provisions. Under the non-compete provisions, during the term of his employment agreement and for a period of six months after termination of employment, the officer is prohibited from, directly or indirectly, engaging in or becoming interested financially in, as a principal, employee, partner, contractor, shareholder, agent, manager, owner, advisor, lender, guarantor, officer or director, any business that is engaged in the nutritional supplement industry and/or related products, subjectDrexler agreed to certain exceptions for passive investments.

Additionally, the non-solicitation provisionsrestrictions on solicitation of the employment agreements prohibit the officer from soliciting for employment any employee of the Company or any person who was an employee of the Company in the 90-day period before such solicitation. This prohibition applies during the officer’s employment with the Company andemployees, which continue for 12 months following the termination of his employment, if his employment is terminated due to disability, by him for good reason or by us with or without cause, due to expiration of the officer’s employment.employment period by notice of non-renewal or due to termination of his employment upon a notice of termination. The employment agreement also contains restrictions with respect to disclosure of the Company’s confidential information.

ChangeMs. Rizvi

We entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Rizvi on April 5, 2021. Under her employment agreement, Ms. Rizvi is entitled to a base salary of $450,000 per year. In addition, Ms. Rizvi is eligible to receive cash bonuses based on performance criteria to be adopted by the Compensation Committee, under her employment agreement, Ms. Rizvi is also entitled to customary employee benefits. Upon joining the Company Ms. Rizvi was given incentive compensation that included 2% of the sales price of the Company should we be sold. In December 2021, this incentive was terminated. Ms. Rizvi was issued an option to purchase 1,811,000 shares of our common stock, the details of which are discussed below in Control PaymentsOutstanding Equity Awards at Year End”.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Year End

As of March 31, 2022 there was one outstanding equity award with our named executive officers. On December 21, 2021, we entered into an agreement under the 2021 Plan with Sabina Rizvi to issue an option to purchase 1,811,000 shares of our common stock, exercisable at a price of $0.40. The Employment Agreements referencedestimated fair value of this grant is $724,393 and was determined by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with a term of 7 years; annual volatility rate of 208%; discount rate of 1.39%; and 0% for dividend rate. The fair value of option is recognized over the requisite vesting period. Upon issuance of this option, the previous incentive compensation discussed above was terminated and all related stock compensation expense recorded in the above provide for payments upon termination or employment after a change in control in certain situations.2021 was reversed.

55

Director Compensation

Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangements

During the year ended December 31, 2021, our non-employee directors earned annual cash retainer fees of $75,000 each.

All cash retainers are prorated for 2012

The following table sets forth the aggregate compensation paidpartial years of service. We pay annual cash retainer fees to our non-employee directors during 2012.quarterly. We also reimburse our non-employee directors for their travel and out of pocket expenses.

Name Fees Earned or Paid In Cash
($)
  Stock Awards(1)(2)
($)
  Total
($)
 
Michael J. Doron  10,000   2,233   12,223 
James J. Greenwell  10,000   2,223   12,223 
Donald W. Prosser  24,000   2,223   26,233 

(1)Reflects the full grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted in 2012 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 based on the closing price of the common stock of $4.1652 (after adjustment for the reverse split of 1-for-850) on November 16, 2012, the date of grant.
(2)Reflects the full grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted for 2012 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 based on the closing price of the common stock of $6.00 on February 14, 2013, the date of grant, to make-up for the shortfall in the number of shares.

2012 Non-Employee Director Compensation Program

In October 2012, our board of directors adopted a non-employee director compensation program. Directors who are employees ofDuring the Company receiveyears ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, no additional compensation was awarded to our employee-directors for their services as directors. Non-employee directors are compensated for their service on our board of directors as described below. The following table describes the components of compensation for non-employee directors in effect beginning October 2012:

Compensation Element2012 Compensation Program ($)
Annual Cash Retainer20,000
Annual Equity Retainer Award25,000
Board Meeting Fees1,000
Audit Committee Chair Committee Meeting Fee1,000
New Director Fee (one-time equity grant)2,000

Annual Cash Retainer and Meeting Fees . Beginning in October 2012, each non-employee director who continues to serve as a director will receive an annual cash retainer fee of $20,000 per year, pro rata for service less than one year. Non-employee directors will also receive $1,000 per meeting attended for all in-person and telephonic meetingsmember of the Board subject to a $6,000 per-year cap onof Directors. Our directors do not receive board meeting fees. Further, the Audit Committee Chair will receive $1,000 per Audit Committee meeting.

Annual Equity Retainer Award. Beginning in January 2013 and pro-rata for the fourth quarter of 2012, each non-employee director will receive $25,000 of the annual board retainer fee in the form of restricted common stock with the number of shares of restricted common stock determined by dividing that dollar amount by the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. These shares of restricted common stock will vest in four equal quarterly installments. The restricted common stock awards will be forfeitable during that vesting period, though directors who leave the board during the year will receive any vested restricted common stock. On February 14, 2013, we granted each non-employee director a restricted stock award for 6,252 restricted shares of common stock that vests as to 1,563 shares on a quarterly basis beginning March 31, 2013.

There was no restricted stock units awarded to directors in 2021 or 2020.

56

New Director Fee (one-time equity grant). Beginning in October 2012, each non-employee director will receive a one-time equity grant of restricted common stock with a value of approximately $2,000 with the number of shares of restricted common stock determined by dividing that dollar amount by the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. These shares of restricted common stock will be fully vested upon grant. On November 16, 2012, we issued 353 shares to our three non-employee directors as their one-time equity grant. On February 14, 2013, we issued an additional 132 shares to our three non-employee directors because the number of shares received by each director on November 16, 2012 was less than the approximate value of $2,000 for the initial grant.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information known to MusclePharm with respect to the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock $0.001 par value per share, as of July 9, 2013, unless otherwise noted, by:

·each stockholder known to MusclePharm to own beneficially more than 5% of MusclePharm’s common stock;
·each of MusclePharm’s directors;
·each of MusclePharm’s named executive officers; and
·all of MusclePharm’s currentMay 10, 2022 by (i) each person known to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, (ii) each of our directors, (iii) each of our named executive officers and (iv) all of our directors and named executive officers as a group.

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Except as otherwise indicated, by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock or Series B Preferred Stock that they beneficially own,owned, subject to applicable community property laws.laws, where applicable.

 

Applicable percentage ownership is based on 9,269,124 shares of common stock and 51 shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding at July 9, 2013. For purposes of computing total voting percentage, each share of Series B Preferred Stock has 150,015.67 votes, resulting in total outstanding shares for purposes of calculating voting percentages of 51%. Except as set forth below, the address of the beneficial owner listed in the table below is c/o MusclePharm Corporation, 4721 Ironton Street, Building A, Denver, Colorado 80239.

  Shares Beneficially Owned 
  Common Stock 
Name of Beneficial Owner (1) Shares  % (2) 
Directors and Named Executive Officers        
Ryan Drexler  [34,533,456](3)  50.13%
Sabina Rizvi  1,811,000(4)  5.01%
         
Paul Karr      
Michael Heller      
All Named Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (4 persons)  35,163,802   54.27%
5% or Greater Stockholders        

  Shares Beneficially Owned    
  Common Stock(1)  Series B Preferred Stock(1)  Total Voting 
Name of Beneficial Owner Shares  %(2)  Shares  %(3)  %(4) 
Named Executive Officers:                    
Brad J. Pyatt  515,418   5.56%  31   60.78%  32.10%
L. Gary Davis  219,678   2.37%  -   -   * 
John H. Bluher  193,118   2.08%  -   -   * 
Jeremy R. DeLuca  368,325   3.97%  -   -   * 
Cory J. Gregory  305,658   3.30%  20   39.22%  21.04%
Richard Estalella  100,000   1.08%  -   -   * 
                     
Non-Employee Directors:                    
Michael J. Doron  31,737   *   -   -   * 
James J. Greenwell  36,737   *   -   -   * 
Donald W. Prosser  31,737   *   -   -   * 
                     
Officers and Directors as a Group (nine persons):  1,802,408   19.45%  51   100%  60.53%

*Represents less than one percent.1%.

(1)The address of each person is c/o MusclePharm Corporation, 6728 W. Sunset Rd., Suite 130, Las Vegas, NV 89119, USA unless otherwise indicated herein.
(1)This column lists beneficial ownership of voting securities as calculated under SEC rules. Otherwise, except to the extent noted below, each director, named executive officer or entity has sole voting and investment power over the shares reported. The shares are not subject to any pledge. Standard brokerage accounts may include nonnegotiable provisions regarding set-offs or similar rights.
(2)Percent of class

The calculation in this column is based on 9,269,124upon 34,348,891 shares of common stock outstanding ason May 10, 2022. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of June 11, 2013. This percentage does not include preferred stock ownership.

(3)Percent of Series B Preferred Stock based on 51 shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding as of June 11, 2013
(4)Percentage of totalthe SEC and generally includes voting power represents votingor investment power with respect to allthe subject securities. Shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or convertible within 60 days of May 10, 2022 are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such securities for the purpose of computing the percentage beneficial ownership of such person, but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage beneficial ownership of any other person.

(3)Includes 16,154,795 shares of ourthe Company’s common stock issuable upon conversion of notes and Series B Preferred Stock voting together as a single class. The holders[1,499,408] shares of our Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to 189,165.80 votes per share, and holders of ourthe Company’s common stock are entitledheld indirectly through Consac LLC, to one vote per share.which Mr. Drexler is the Chief Executive Officer..
(4)Includes option to purchase 1,811,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

Changes in Control

We are not aware of any arrangements that may result in changes in control” as that term is defined by the provisions of Item 403(c) of Regulation S-K.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In addition to the named executive officer and director compensation arrangements discussed in “Executive Compensation”, below we describe transactions since January 1, 2012, to which we have been a participant, in which the amount involved in the transaction exceeds or will exceed $120,000 and in which any of our directors, executive officers or holders of more than 5% of our capital stock, or any immediate family member of, or person sharing the household with, any of these individuals, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Consulting Agreements

On November 23, 2011, we entered into a consulting agreement with El Chichon Partners, LLC and Gordon G. Burr, a former director, prior to Mr. Burr becoming a director of the Company. The consulting agreement provides that Mr. Burr will identify potential financing sources for us. The amount paid under this agreement in the year ended December 31, 2011 was $200,000, which was paid in the form of a warrant issued in the name of El Chichon Partners, LLC and exercisable for 117,648 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.20 per share of common stock. Further, this agreement was amended on April 20, 2012 and added an additional warrant issued in the name of El Chichon Partners, LLC and exercisable for 35,295 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.75 per share of common stock. Each warrant has a lock-up of one year after exercise thereof. The shares of common stock underlying each warrant have demand registration rights after 12 months and piggy-back registration rights.

On July 12, 2012, we entered into a consulting agreement with Melechdavid, Inc. (“Melechdavid”), an affiliate of Mark E. Groussman, a former director, prior to Mr. Groussman becoming a director of the Company ( the “Original Melechdavid Consulting Agreement”). The Original Melechdavid Consulting Agreement provides that Melechdavid will provide consulting services to us related to strategic acquisitions, capital restructuring and Mr. Groussman will serve as a member of the board of directors. Mr. Groussman was appointed to our board of directors on July 19, 2012, and resigned from our board effective October 18, 2012. The Original Melechdavid Consulting Agreement provides that we will issue to Melechdavid shares of common stock in an amount equal to 4.2% of our outstanding common stock on a fully diluted (as-converted) basis. The Original Melechdavid Consulting Agreement provides that the Company will issue to Melechdavid shares of common stock in an amount equal to 4.2% of the Company’s outstanding common stock on a fully diluted (as-converted) basis. Further, until July 12, 2014, the Company is required to ensure that Melechdavid shall maintain its 4.2% fully diluted equity position as reduced for any shares sold by them. The term of the Original Melechdavid Consulting Agreement is 12 months.  On April 2, 2013, the Company entered into a first amendment to the Original Melechdavid Consulting Agreement with Melechdavid, effective as of March 28, 2013 (the “Melechdavid Amended Agreement”). Pursuant to the Melechdavid Amended Agreement, Melechdavid agreed to cap the shares of the Company’s common stock that it is entitled to receive under the Original Melechdavid Consulting Agreement to no more than 570,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company, after giving effect to the 1-for-850 reverse stock split of the common stock effected by the Company on November 26, 2012. In connection with the execution and delivery of the Melechdavid Amended Agreement, the Company issued Melechdavid an aggregate of 341,247 shares of Common Stock on March 29, 2013 and agreed to issue Melechdavid an additional 228,753 shares of Common Stock within five business days of the Melechdavid Amended Agreement as full satisfaction of the Company’s obligations under the Original Melechdavid Consulting Agreement. These additional shares were issued. These shares of common stock that are still held by Melechdavid from these shares are included in the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

On July 12, 2012, we entered into a consulting agreement with GRQ Consultants, Inc. (“GRQ”), an affiliate of Barry C. Honig (the “Original GRQ Consulting Agreement”). The Original GRQ Consulting Agreement provides that GRQ will provide consulting services to us related to banking relationships, strategic acquisitions and capital restructuring. The Original GRG Consulting Agreement provides that we will issue to GRQ shares of common stock in an amount equal to 4.2% of our outstanding common stock on a fully diluted (as-converted) basis. Further, until July 12, 2014, we are required to ensure that GRQ shall maintain its 4.2% fully diluted equity position as reduced for any shares sold by them. The term of the consulting agreement is 12 months. On April 2, 2013, the Company entered into a first amendment to the Original GRQ Consulting Agreement with GRQ, effective as of March 28, 2013 (the “GRQ Amended Agreement”). Pursuant to the GRQ Amended Agreement, GRQ agreed to cap the shares of the Company’s common stock that it is entitled to receive under the Original GRQ Consulting Agreement to no more than 420,000 shares of common stock of the Company, after giving effect to the 1-for-850 reverse stock split of the Common Stock effected by the Company on November 26, 2012. In connection with the execution and delivery of the GRQ Amended Agreement, the Company issued GRQ an aggregate of 305,889 shares of common stock on March 29, 2013 and agreed to issue GRQ an additional 78,753 shares of common stock within five business days of the GRQ Amended Agreement as full satisfaction of the Company’s obligations under the Original GRQ Consulting Agreement. The Company had previously issued GRQ 35,359 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Original GRQ Consulting Agreement. These additional shares were issued. These shares that are held by GRQ from these shares are included in the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

Indemnification Agreements

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and named executive officers. The indemnification agreements and our bylaws will require us to indemnify our directors to the fullest extent permitted by Nevada law.

5257
 

Warrant ConversionSecurities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table shows information regarding our equity compensation plans, as of March 31, 2022.

PLAN CATEGORY Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of outstanding options
  Weighted average
exercise price of outstanding options
  Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:            
2015 Incentive Compensation Plan  171,703  $1.89   576,494 
2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan(1)  1,811,000  $0.40   (1)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  -   -   - 
Total            

(1)The 2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive plan defines the number of shares of Common Stock that are reserved and available for issuance pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan shall be equal to the sum of (i) 5,876,554 shares, plus (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock reserved, but unissued under the Prior Plan; (iii) the number of shares of Common Stock underlying forfeited awards under the Prior Plan; and (iv) an annual increase on the first day of each calendar year beginning with the first January 1 following the Effective Date and ending with the last January 1 during the initial ten-year term of the Plan, equal to the lesser of (A) five percent (5%) of the Shares outstanding (on an as-converted basis, which shall include Shares issuable upon the exercise or conversion of all outstanding securities or rights convertible into or exercisable for Shares, including without limitation, preferred stock, warrants and employee options to purchase any Shares) on the final day of the immediately preceding calendar year and (B) such lesser number of Shares as determined by the Board; provided, that, shares of Common Stock issued under the Plan with respect to an Exempt Award shall not count against such share limit. Following the Effective Date, no further awards shall be issued under the Prior Plan, but all awards under the Prior Plan which are outstanding as of the Effective Date (including any Grandfathered Arrangement) shall continue to be governed by the terms, conditions and procedures set forth in the Prior Plan and any applicable Award Agreement.

58

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Related-Party Refinanced Convertible Note

On September 20, 2012, weAugust 21, 2020, the Company entered into a warrant conversionrefinancing agreement with Mr. Bluher, ourRyan Drexler, the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive ViceOfficer and President (the “2020 Refinancing”), with an effective date of July 1, 2020. As part of the 2020 Refinancing, the Company issued to Mr. Drexler an amended and Chief Operating Officer, forrestated convertible secured promissory note (the 2020 “Refinanced Convertible Note”) in the original principal amount of $2.7 million which amended and restated (i) a convertible secured promissory note dated as of November 8, 2017, $1.1 million of which was outstanding as of July 1, 2020 (ii) a collateral receipt and security agreement with Mr. Drexler dated as of December 27, 2019, $0.3 million of which was outstanding as of July 1, 2020, and (iii) a secured revolving promissory note dated as of October 4, 2019, $1.3 million of which was outstanding as of July 1, 2020. The $2.7 million 2020 Refinanced Convertible Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum.

The 2020 Refinanced Convertible Note contains customary restrictions on the ability of the Company to, among other things, grant liens or incur indebtedness other than certain obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business. The restrictions are also subject to certain additional qualifications and carveouts, as set forth in the 2020 Refinanced Convertible Note. The 2020 Refinanced Convertible Note is subordinated to certain other indebtedness of the Company held by Prestige Capital Finance, LLC, as successor by merger to Prestige Capital Corporation (together, “Prestige”) and Crossroads Financial Group, LLC (“Crossroads”). The Company may prepay the 2020 Refinanced Convertible Note by giving Mr. Drexler between 15- and 60-days’ notice depending upon the specific circumstances, subject to Mr. Drexler’s conversion of warrants to purchase 29,412right. Mr. Drexler may convert the outstanding principal and accrued interest into shares of ourthe Company’s common stock into 19,589 sharesat a conversion price equal to or greater than (i) the closing price per share of ourthe common stock.stock on the last business day immediately preceding November 1, 2020 or (ii) $0.17.

All outstanding principal and accrued but unpaid interest under the 2020 Refinanced Convertible Note were due and payable on November 1, 2020. The Note was in default on that date and the Company agreed with Mr. Drexler to amend the 2020 Refinancing by the end of November 2020. Interest accrued but unpaid, totaling $26,000 was capitalized on the due date and added to the principal amount of the 2020 Refinanced Convertible Note.

On September 12, 2012, weNovember 29, 2020, the Company entered into a warrant conversionrefinancing agreement with El Chichon Partners, LLC (an entity affiliated with Mr. Burr,Ryan Drexler, (the “November 2020 Refinancing”), in which the Company issued to Mr. Drexler a former directorconvertible secured promissory note (the November 2020 “Convertible Note”) in the original principal amount of $2.9 million, which amended and restated a convertible secured promissory note dated as of August 21, 2020. The $2.9 million November 2020 Convertible Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum. Unless earlier converted or repaid, all outstanding principal and any accrued but unpaid interest under the November 2020 Convertible Note shall be due and payable on July 1, 2021. Any interest not paid when due shall be capitalized and added to the principal amount of the Company) forNovember 2020 Convertible Note and bear interest on the applicable interest payment date along with all other unpaid principal, capitalized interest, and other capitalized obligations.

Mr. Drexler may, at any time, and from time to time, upon written notice to the Company, convert the outstanding principal and accrued interest into shares of Common Stock, at a conversion price of $0.23 per share. At the election of the Company, one-sixth of the interest may be paid in kind (“PIK Interest”) by adding such amount to the principal amount of the note, or through the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock to Mr. Drexler. The PIK Interest is convertible to common stock at the closing price per share on the last business day of each calendar quarter. In no event will the conversion price of warrantssuch PIK Interest be less than $0.10. The Company may prepay the Note by giving Mr. Drexler between 15- and 60-days’ notice depending upon the specific circumstances, subject to purchase 152,942 sharesMr. Drexler’s conversion right. The Company intends to pay all interest due on the Convertible Note to Mr. Drexler at the end of our common stock into 101,859 shareseach calendar quarter.

The November 2020 Convertible Note contains customary restrictions on the ability of our common stock.the Company to, among other things, grant liens or incur indebtedness other than certain obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business. The restrictions are also subject to certain additional qualifications and carveouts, as set forth in the November 2020 Convertible Note. The November 2020 Convertible Note is subordinated to certain other indebtedness of the Company held by Prestige and the Senior Notes.

59

Related Party Secured Revolving Promissory Note

On September 30, 2012, weOctober 15, 2020, the Company entered into a warrantsecured revolving promissory note (the “Revolving Note”) with Ryan Drexler. Under the terms of the Revolving Note, the Company can borrow up to $3.0 million. The Revolving Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum. The funds were used for the purchase of whey protein and other general corporate purposes. Both the outstanding principal, if any, and all accrued interest under the Revolving Note were due on March 31, 2021.

On August 13, 2021, the Company issued to Ryan Drexler (the “Holder”) a convertible secured promissory note (the “August 2021 Convertible Note”) in the original principal amount of $2.5 million and cancelled the Revolving Note.

The August 2021 Convertible Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum. Interest payments are due on the last day of each calendar quarter. At the Company’s option (as determined by its independent directors), the Company may repay up to one sixth of any interest payment by either adding such amount to the principal amount of the August 2021 Convertible Note or by converting such interest amount into an equivalent amount of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”). Any interest not paid when due shall be capitalized and added to the principal amount of the August 2021 Convertible Note and bear interest on the applicable interest payment date along with all other unpaid principal, capitalized interest, and other capitalized obligations. Both the principal and any accrued but unpaid interest under the August 2021 Convertible Note will be due on July 14, 2022, unless converted or repaid earlier.

The Holder may, at any time, and from time to time, upon written notice to the Company, convert the outstanding principal and accrued interest into shares of Common Stock, at a conversion agreement with Mr. Groussman,price equal to the closing price of the common stock on October 15, 2021. The Company may prepay the August 2021 Convertible Note by giving the Holder between 15 and 60 days’ notice depending upon the specific circumstances, subject to the Holder’s conversion right.

The August 2021 Convertible Note contains customary events of default, including, among others, the failure by the Company to make a former directorpayment of principal or interest when due. Following an event of default, at the option of the Holder and upon written notice to the Company, or automatically under certain circumstances, all outstanding principal and accrued interest will become due and payable. The August 2021 Convertible Note also contains customary restrictions on the ability of the Company to, among other things, grant liens or incur indebtedness other than certain obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business. The restrictions are also subject to certain additional qualifications and carveouts, as set forth in the August 2021 Convertible Note. The August 2021 Convertible Note is subordinated to certain other indebtedness of the Company held by Prestige and the Senior Notes.

The revolver balance of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 was zero.

Related Party Financing

On March 8, 2022, the Company entered into an Unsecured Revolving Promissory Note (the “Note”) with the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company (the “Lender”). The Company expects to initially borrow approximately $3 million under the Note. Under the terms of the Note, proceeds may be used solely to finance the production of orders from its largest customer or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries. The Note does not contain a cap on borrowings thereunder. However, further advances under the Note are at the time, fordiscretion of the conversionLender. Outstanding balances under the Note accrue interest at the rate of warrants18% per annum. Prior to purchase 4,412 sharesmaturity, the Company generally may pay down principal balances and re-borrow under the Note, subject to the discretion of our common stock into 3,750 sharesthe Lender to advance funds under the Note. The Note contains customary events of our common stock.default and acceleration provisions.

The Note is subordinate to the 14% Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Notes previously issued by the Company. Under the terms of the First Amendment to Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2022, between the Company, Ryan Drexler and Empery Tax Efficient, LP (the “Amendment”), principal but not interest due under the Note generally may be repaid out of payments received by the Company in respect of accounts receivable financed pursuant to the Note.

60

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Parties

We intend to adopthave a written related person transactions policy that our executive officers, directors, nominees for election as a director, beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock, and any members of the immediate family of and any entity affiliated with any of the foregoing persons, are not permitted to enter into a material related person transaction with us without the review and approval of our audit committee,Audit Committee, or a committee composed solely of independent directors in the event it is inappropriate for our audit committeeAudit Committee to review such transaction due to a conflict of interest. We expect theThe policy to provideprovides that any request for us to enter into a transaction with an executive officer, director, nominee for election as a director, beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock or with any of their immediate family members or affiliates, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000$0.12 million will be presented to our audit committeeAudit Committee for review, consideration and approval.

In approving or rejecting any such proposal, we expect that our audit committeeAudit Committee will consider the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant to the audit committee,Audit Committee, including, but not limited to, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related person’spersons interest in the transaction.

Director Independence

The rules of Nasdaq generally require that a majority of the members of a listed company’s Board of Directors be independent. In addition, the listing rules generally require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation, and governance committees be independent. Although we are an over-the-counter listed company, we have not had a written policy for the review and approvalnevertheless opted under our Corporate Governance Guidelines to comply with certain Nasdaq corporate governance rules requiring director independence. The Board of transactions with related persons, our board of directorsDirectors has historically reviewed and approved any transaction where a director or officer had a financial interest, includingdetermined that all of the transactions described above. PriorCompany’s directors, other than Mr. Drexler, are each independent director as such term is defined in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2). Additionally, when our director nominee commences their service on our Board of Directors at the time of effectiveness of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, a majority of our Board of Directors will be independent.

Our Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Audit committees are comprised solely of independent directors.

Audit Committee members must also satisfy the independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. In order to approving suchbe considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3, a transaction,member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the material factsaudit committee, the Board of Directors, or any other board committee: accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries; or be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.

Our Board of Directors has determined that none of our non-employee directors has a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and that each of these directors is independent as that term is defined under the rules of Nasdaq. Our Board of Directors has also determined that directors who comprise our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee satisfy the independence standards for those committees established by applicable SEC rules, Nasdaq rules and applicable rules of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

61

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

The following description of the Company’s capital stock is based upon the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended (“Articles of Incorporation”), the Company’s Amended and Restated By-Laws (“By-laws”) and applicable provisions of law. We have summarized certain portions of the Articles of Incorporation and By-laws below. The summary is not complete and is subject to, a director’s or officer’s relationship or interest asand is qualified in its entirety by express reference to, the agreement or transaction were disclosedprovisions of the Articles of Incorporation and By-laws, each of which is filed as an exhibit to our boardregistration statement of directors. Our boardwhich this prospectus is a part.

Authorized Stock

As of directors would take this information into account when evaluating the transaction and in determining whether such transaction was fair to us and indate hereof, the best interest of all of our stockholders.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

General

OurCompany’s authorized capital stock consistsconsist of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 9,269,124 of which are issuedper share and outstanding as of July 9, 2013), 5,000,000 Shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (of which none are issued and outstanding as of June 11, 2013), 5110,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock (51 of which are issued and outstanding as of July 9, 2013), 500 shares of Series C Preferred Stock (190 of which are issued and zero outstanding) and 1,600,000 Shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock 145,000 of which are issued and outstanding as of July 9, 2013). Our preferred stock, and/or common stock may be issued from time to time without prior approval by our stockholders. Our preferred stock and/or common stock may be issued for such consideration as may be fixed from time to time by our boardpar value $0.001 per share.

Issued and Outstanding Stock

As of directors. Our board of directors may issue such shares of our preferred stock and/or common stock in one or more series, with such voting powers, designations, preferences and rights or qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof as shall be stated in the resolution or resolutions.

Common Stock

The Company, a Nevada corporation, is authorized to issue 100,000,000May 10, 2022, 34,348,891 shares of common stock $0.001 par value.were issued and outstanding. The holdersoutstanding shares of the Company’s common stock: (i) have equal rightsstock are duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. As of the date hereof, no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding.

Dividend Rights

Dividends upon the capital stock of the Company, subject to dividends from funds legally available therefore, ratably when as andthe provisions of the Articles of Incorporation, if any, may be declared by the Company’s Board of Directors; (ii) are entitledDirectors (the “Board of Directors”) at any regular or special meeting, pursuant to share ratablylaw. Dividends may be paid in all assetscash, in property or in shares of capital stock, subject to the provisions of the Company available forArticles of Incorporation.

Rights Upon Liquidation

Subject to compliance with the provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the powers of the Board of Directors shall include the power to make a liquidating distribution to holders of common stock uponthe assets, and wind up the affairs of the Company.

Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company’s affairs, the holders of the Company; (iii) do not have preemptive, subscription or conversion rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable thereto; (iv)Company’s common stock are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share ratably in the Company’s assets that are legally available for distribution, after payment of commonall debts, other liabilities and subject to prior distribution rights of the Company’s preferred stock, on all matters which shareholders may vote on at all meetingsif any, then outstanding.

Conversion, Redemption and Preemptive Rights

Holders of shareholders; and (v) the holders ofCompany’s common stock have no conversion, redemption, preemptive or other subscriptionsimilar rights.  There is no cumulative voting for

Voting Rights

Each outstanding share of the election of directors.  As of June 11, 2013, there were 7,350,768 shares of common stock outstanding.  Each holder of ourCompany’s common stock is entitled to one vote for each shareat all meetings of our common stock held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders.

Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

As of July 9, 2013, there were 5,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock designated and 0 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding. According to the Certificate of Designation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State, these shares are non-voting, and have no dividend or liquidation rights. Each share is convertible into two hundred (200) shares of common stock, provided, however, no holder of the Series A Convertible preferred stock will haveEvery stockholder having the right to convert any of such shares to the extent that after giving effect to such conversion, the beneficial owner of such shares would beneficially own in excess of 4.9% of the shares of the common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such conversion.

Series B Preferred Stock

As of July 9, 2013, there were 51 shares of Series B Preferred Stock designated and 51 shares of Series B Preferred Stock issued and outstanding. According to the Certificate of Designation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State, these shares have no dividend rights, liquidation rights on a pro rata basis, no conversion rights and rank senior to the Company’s common stock. Each one (1) share of Series B Preferred Stockvote shall have voting rights equal to (x) 0.019607multiplied by the total issued and outstanding common stock eligible to vote at the time of the respective vote (the Numerator”)divided by (y) 0.49,minus (z) the Numerator. The 51 shares of Series B Preferred Stock entitle the holders to voting rights equivalent to 51% of the shares of common stock then outstanding.

Series C Convertible Preferred Stock

As of July 9, 2013, there were 500 shares of Series C Preferred Stock designated and 190 shares of Series C Preferred Stock issued and zero outstanding. According to the Certificate of Designation filed with the Nevada Secretary of State, these shares have the following rights, designations and preferences:

Stated Value : The stated value per share of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is $1,000.00

Voting Rights : The holders of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock are notbe entitled to vote with the Company’s common stockholders.

Protective Provisions : As longin person, or by proxy. Except as provided by applicable law, rule or regulation, when a quorum is present at any Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is outstanding, we are prohibited from taking anymeeting of the following actions withoutstockholders, any action by the consentstockholders on a matter except the election of adirectors shall be approved if approved by the majority of the then outstanding Series C Convertible Preferred Stock:votes cast. No stockholder shall have cumulative voting rights.

(i)alter or change adversely the powers, preferences or rights given to the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock;

(ii)alter or amend the certificate of designation;

(iii)authorize or create any class of stock ranking as to dividends or distribution of assets upon a liquidation or otherwise senior to or pari passu with the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock;

(iv)amend its certificate of incorporation, bylaws or other charter documents so as to affect adversely any rights of any holders of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock;

(v)increase the authorized or designated number of shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock;

(vi)issue any additional shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock; or

(vii)enter into any agreement with respect to the foregoing.

Directors are elected by the majority of the votes cast at which a quorum is present,Voluntary Conversionprovided, however, : A holder of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock can elect to convert its Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock at any time from and after the Original Issue Date (as definedthat, in the certificatecase of designation). Each sharea director nominee in a Contested Election, the Board of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible intoDirectors, in its sole discretion, may determine that directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast in any Contested Election. For purposes of these By-laws, a “Contested Election” means an election of directors with respect to which the Board of Directors determines that the number of sharesnominees exceeds the number of our common stock determined by dividing the stated value of such share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (as increased for accrued dividends) by the conversion price.directors to be elected.

Conversion Price : The conversion price is the higher of (i) $0.01

62

Listing and (ii) such price that is a 50% discount to the average of the low 2 closing bid prices for theTransfer Agent

The Company’s common stock foris quoted on the five trading days immediately prior to such day that a holder delivers a notice of conversion toPink Open Market which is operated by the Company, subject to adjustment.

Series D Preferred Stock

OTC Markets Group, under the symbol “MSLP.” The terms of the Series D Preferred Stock are contained in a certificate of designation that amends our articles of incorporation. The following description is a summary of the material provisions of the Series D Preferred Stock and the certificate of designation. It does not purport to be complete. We urge you to read the certificate of designation because it, and not this description, defines your rights as a holder of shares of Series D Preferred Stock. As used in this section, the terms “MusclePharm,” “us,” “we” or “our” refer to MusclePharm Corporation and not any of its subsidiaries.

General

Our board of directors is authorized to cause us to issue, from our authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock, one or more series of preferred stock, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series, as well as to fix the designation and any preferences, conversion and other rights and limitations of such series. These rights and limitations may include voting powers, limitations as to dividends, and qualifications and terms and conditions of redemption of the shares of each such series. Pursuant to this authority, prior to this offering, our board of directors established the terms of the Series D Preferred Stock, which are described below.

When issued, the Series D Preferred Stock will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. The holders of the Series D Preferred Stock have no preemptive rights under Nevada law with respect to any issuances of our stock or any securities convertible into or other rights or options to purchase any such stock. The Series D Preferred Stock is not subject to any sinking fund or other obligation of us to redeem or retire the Series D Preferred Stock. The Series D Preferred Stock will have a perpetual term with no maturity.

Our shares of Series D Preferred Stock will have no public market and will not be listed to trade on an exchange or any market.

TheCompany’s transfer agent and registrar and for the Series D Preferred Stock is Corporate Stock Transfer, Inc.Equiniti Trust Company.

Ranking – Dividends and Liquidation

The Series D Preferred Stock ranks, with respect to dividend rights and rights on liquidation, dissolution and winding-up of the affairs of the Company, equal to the common stock and junior to each other class or series of our capital stock, the terms of which expressly provide that such other class or series ranks senior to the Series D Preferred Stock as to dividends or upon liquidation, dissolution and winding-up, or as to any other right or preference.

Voting

The Series D Preferred Stock votes together with the common stock on an as-converted basis, but not in excess of the conversion limitations set forth below. Except as otherwise required by law, the holders of shares of Series D Preferred Stock vote together with the holders of common stock on all matters and not as a separate class.

Redemption

The Series D Preferred Stock is not redeemable either at our option or at the option of the holders. The Series D Preferred Stock is not subject to any sinking fund or other obligation to redeem, repurchase or retire the Series D Preferred Stock.

Conversion Rights

Optional Conversion

Each holder of Series D Preferred Stock may, from time to time, convert any or all of such holder’s shares of Series D Preferred Stock into fully paid and non-assessable shares of common stock in an amount equal to two shares of common stock for each one share of Series D Preferred Stock surrendered (subject to adjustment described below, the “Conversion Rate”).

Mandatory Conversion

At such time as the number of outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock is less than 250,000 shares, then (i) all outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock will automatically be converted into shares of common stock at the then effective Conversion Rate, and (ii) such shares of Series D Preferred Stock may be reissued.

Conversion Limitation

At no time may a holder of shares of Series D Preferred Stock convert its shares of Series D Preferred Stock into our common stock if the number of shares of common stock to be issued pursuant to such conversion would exceed, when aggregated with all other shares of common stock owned by the holder at such time, the number of shares of common stock which would result in the holder beneficially owning (as determined in accordance with Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules thereunder) more than 4.99% of all of our common stock outstanding at such time (the “4.99% Beneficial Ownership Limitation”). However, a holder may waive this limitation by providing us with 61 days’ advance notice. At no time may all or a portion of the Series D Preferred Stock be converted by a holder if the number of shares of common stock to be issued pursuant to such conversion, when aggregated with all other shares of our common stock owned by the holder at such time, would result in the holder beneficially owning (as determined in accordance with Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules thereunder) in excess of 9.99% of the then issued and outstanding shares of our common stock outstanding at such time (the “9.99% Beneficial Ownership Limitation” and the lower of the 9.99% Beneficial Ownership Limitation and the 4.99% Beneficial Ownership Limitation then in effect, the “Maximum Percentage”)). By written notice to the Company, a holder of Series D Preferred Stock may from time to time decrease the Maximum Percentage to any other percentage specified in such notice.

No Fractional Shares

No fractional shares of our common stock will be issued upon the conversion of the Series D Preferred Stock and the number of shares of common stock to be issued will be rounded up to the nearest whole share.

Anti-Dilution Adjustments

Stock Dividends and Stock Splits

If we, at any time while any share of the Series D Preferred Stock is outstanding we:

·pay a stock dividend or otherwise make a distribution relating to our common stock or any other equity or equity equivalent securities payable in shares of common stock;

·subdivide outstanding shares of common stock into a larger number of shares;

·combine outstanding shares of our common stock into a smaller number of shares (including by way of reverse stock split); or

·issue by reclassification of shares of the common stock any shares of our capital stock;

then the Conversion Rate will be adjusted such that holders of outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock will receive, upon conversion, such number of shares of common stock into which such outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock would have been convertible into, immediately prior to such foregoing events, adjusted to take into account any additional or lessened shares of our capital stock the holder would have been entitled to had the holder converted such shares of Series D Preferred Stock and been the holder of the underlying shares of common stock prior to such events.

Adjustments for Reclassification, Exchange or Substitution

If the common stock issuable upon conversion of shares of Series D Preferred Stock is changed to the same or different number of shares of any class or classes of stock (other than by way of a stock split or combination of shares or stock dividends, or a Fundamental Transaction (as defined below)), then an appropriate adjustment to the Conversion Rate will be made and provisions will be made (by adjustments of the Conversion Rate or otherwise) so that the holder of outstanding Series D Preferred Stock will have the right thereafter to convert any outstanding shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock into the kind and amount of shares of stock and other securities receivable upon reclassification, exchange, substitution or other change, by holders of outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock of the number of shares of common stock into which such outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock might have been converted immediately prior to such reclassification, exchange, substitution or other change.

Fundamental Transaction

If, at any time while any share of the Series D Preferred Stock is outstanding;

·we effect any merger or consolidation of us with or into another person;

·we effect any sale of all or substantially all of our assets in one transaction or a series of related transactions;

·any tender offer or exchange offer (whether us or another person) is completed pursuant to which holders of common stock are permitted to tender or exchange their shares for other securities, cash or property; or

·we effect any reclassification of the common stock or any compulsory share exchange pursuant to which the common stock is effectively converted into or exchanged for other securities, cash or property (in any such case, a “Fundamental Transaction”);

then, upon any subsequent conversion of shares of Series D Preferred Stock, the holders shall have the right to receive, for each share of common stock that would have been issuable upon such conversion immediately prior to the occurrence of such Fundamental Transaction, the same kind and amount of securities, cash or property as the holder would have been entitled to receive upon the occurrence of the Fundamental Transaction if it had been, immediately prior to such Fundamental Transaction, the holder of common stock.

Favored Nations Provision

Other than in connection with Excepted Issuances (as defined below), if at any time while any shares of Series D Preferred Stock are outstanding, we issue, without the consent of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock, (a “Trigger Issuance”) any shares of common stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of common stock at a price per share or conversion or exercise price per share (the “Trigger Issuance Price”) which is less than the Conversion Price (as defined below), then the Conversion Rate will be adjusted by multiplying the Conversion Rate in effect immediately prior to the Trigger Issuance by a fraction, the numerator of which will be the Conversion Price and the denominator of which will be the Trigger Issuance Price. Common stock issued by us for no consideration (other than stock dividends or stock splits, as described above) or for consideration that cannot be determined at the time the common stock is issued will be deemed to have been issued at $0.001 per share. So long as any shares of Series D Preferred Stock are outstanding, we will not enter into any variable, floating rate or similar agreement providing for issuance of any of our equity securities or convertible into our securities on any basis in which the conversion or strike price thereof is determined on the basis of the market price of our common stock.

The term “Conversion Price” shall equal $4.00 (subject to adjustment from time to time).

The term “Excepted Issuances” means any of the following:

·full or partial consideration in connection with a strategic merger, acquisition, consolidation or purchase of substantially all of the securities or assets of a corporation or other entity;
·the issuance of securities in connection with strategic license agreements and other partnering arrangements so long as such issuances are not for the purpose of raising capital;

·the issuance of common stock or the issuances or grants of options to purchase common stock to employees, directors, and consultants, pursuant to plans in effect as of the date of the certificate of designation that have been approved by a majority vote of the stockholders and a majority of the independent members of our board of directors as such plans are constituted on the date of this certificate of designation;

·the issuance of common stock pursuant to agreements entered into prior to the date of the certificate of designation, as such agreements are in effect and constituted on the date of this certificate of designation, without regard to any further amendment;

·the issuance of common stock upon the exercise or exchange of or conversion of any securities exercisable or exchangeable for or convertible into shares of common stock issued and outstanding on the date of the certificate of designation on the terms then in effect;

the issuance of common stock or the issuances or grants of options to purchase common stock to consultants and service providers approved by a majority of the independent members of our board of directors; and

and all securities required to be assumed by the Company by the terms as a result of any of the foregoing even if issued by a predecessor acquired in connection with a business combination, merger or share exchange.

Equal Treatment of Holders of Shares of Series D Preferred Stock

No consideration shall be offered or paid to any person or entity to amend or consent to a waiver or modification of any provision of the certificate of designation or related transaction document unless the same consideration is also offered to all of holders of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock.

Anti-Takeover Provisions

Nevada Revised Statutes

Acquisition of Controlling Interest Statutes.

Nevada’s “acquisition of controlling interest” statutes contain provisions governing the acquisition of a controlling interest in certain Nevada corporations. These “control share” laws provide generally that any person that acquires a “controlling interest” in certain Nevada corporations may be denied certain voting rights, unless a majority of the disinterested stockholders of the corporation elects to restore such voting rights. These statutes provide that a person acquires a “controlling interest” whenever a person acquires shares of a subject corporation that, but for the application of these provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes, would enable that person to exercise (1) one-fifth or more, but less than one-third, (2) one-third or more, but less than a majority or (3) a majority or more, of all of the voting power of the corporation in the election of directors.

Once an acquirer crosses one of these thresholds, shares which it acquired in the transaction taking it over the threshold and within the 90 days immediately preceding the date when the acquiring person acquired or offered to acquire a controlling interest become “control shares” to which the voting restrictions described above apply. Our articlesThe Articles of incorporationIncorporation and bylawsBy-laws currently contain no provisions relating to these statutes, and unless our articlesthe Articles of incorporationIncorporation or bylawsBy-laws in effect on the tenth day after the acquisition of a controlling interest were to provide otherwise, these laws would apply to usthe Company if wethe Company were to (i) have 200 or more stockholders of record (at least 100 of which have addresses in the State of Nevada appearing on ourthe Company’s stock ledger) and (ii) do business in the State of Nevada directly or through an affiliated corporation. As of January 15, 2013, we have over 200 record stockholders, but do not have 100 stockholders of records with Nevada addresses appearing on our stock ledger.

If these laws were to apply to us,the Company, they might discourage companies or persons interested in acquiring a significant interest in or control of the Company, regardless of whether such acquisition may be in the interest of ourthe Company’s stockholders.

Combinations with Interested Stockholders Statutes.

Nevada’s “combinations with interested stockholders” statutes prohibit certain business “combinations” between certain Nevada corporations and any person deemed to be an “interested stockholder” for two years after the such person first becomes an “interested stockholder” unless (i) the corporation’s board of directors approves the combination (or the transaction by which such person becomes an “interested stockholder”) in advance, or (ii) the combination is approved by the board of directors and sixty percent of the corporation’s voting power not beneficially owned by the interested shareholder, its affiliates and associates. Furthermore, in the absence of prior approval certain restrictions may apply even after such two-year period.

For purposes of these statutes, an “interested stockholder” is any person who is (x) the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of ten percent or more of the voting power of the outstanding voting shares of the corporation, or (y) an affiliate or associate of the corporation and at any time within the two previous years was the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of ten percent or more of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of the corporation. The definition of the term “combination” is sufficiently broad to cover most significant transactions between the corporation and an “interested stockholder”. Subject to certain timing requirements set forth in the statutes, a corporation may elect not to be governed by these statutes. We haveThe Company has not included any such provision in our articlesthe Articles of incorporation.Incorporation.

The effect of these statutes may be to potentially discourage parties interested in taking control of the Company from doing so if it cannot obtain the approval of our boardthe Board of directors.Directors.

 

Articles of Incorporation and BylawsBy-laws Provisions

Our articlesThe Articles of incorporation, as amended,Incorporation and bylawsBy-laws contain provisions that could have the effect of discouraging potential acquisition proposals or tender offers or delaying or preventing a change in control, including changes a stockholder might consider favorable. In particular, our articlesthe Articles of incorporationIncorporation and bylawsBy-laws among other things:

·permit our boardthe Board of directorsDirectors to alter our bylawsthe By-laws without stockholder approval; and

·provide that vacancies on our boardthe Board of directorsDirectors may be filled by a majority of directors in office, although less than a quorum.

Such provisions may have the effect of discouraging a third-party from acquiring us,the Company, even if doing so would be beneficial to ourthe Company’s stockholders. These provisions are intended to enhance the likelihood of continuity and stability in the composition of our boardthe Board of directorsDirectors and in the policies formulated by them, and to discourage some types of transactions that may involve an actual or threatened change in control of our company.the Company. These provisions are designed to reduce ourthe Company’s vulnerability to an unsolicited acquisition proposal and to discourage some tactics that may be used in proxy fights. We believeThe Company believes that the benefits of increased protection of ourthe Company’s potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure our companythe Company outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging such proposals because, among other things, negotiation of such proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.

However, these provisions could have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for ourthe Company’s shares that could result from actual or rumored takeover attempts. These provisions also may have the effect of preventing changes in ourthe Company’s management.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Corporate Stock Transfer, 3200 Cherry Creek Drive South, Suite 430, Denver, Colorado 80209.

Listing

The shares of our common stock are currently quoted on the OTC QB under the symbol “MSLP.OB”.

SELLING SHAREHOLDERS

We are registering an aggregate of 1,740,691 Resale Shares for resale by the Selling Shareholders listed in the table below. All expenses incurred with respect to the registration of the Common Stock will be paid by us, but we will not be obligated to pay any underwriting fees, discounts, commissions or other expenses incurred by the Selling Shareholders in connection with the sale of such shares.

The Selling Shareholders may also resell all or a portion of their securities in reliance upon Rule 144 under the Securities Act provided that they meet the criteria and conform to the requirements of that rule or by any other available means.

The Selling Shareholders named below may from time to time offer and sell pursuant to this prospectus up to 1,740,691 Resale Shares. The shares of our Common Stock included in the Resale Shares were issued to the Selling Shareholders in the transaction described in the footnotes to the following table.

The following table sets forth:

·the name of the Selling Shareholders;

·the number and percent of shares of our Common Stock that the Selling Shareholders beneficially owned prior to the offering for resale of the shares under this prospectus;

·the number of shares of our Common Stock that may be offered for resale for the account of the Selling Shareholders under this prospectus; and

·the number and percent of shares of our Common Stock to be beneficially owned by the Selling Shareholders after the offering of the Resale Shares (assuming all of the offered Resale Shares are sold by the Selling Shareholders).

The number of shares in the column “Number of Shares Being Offered” represents all of the shares that each Selling Shareholder may offer under this prospectus. We do not know how long the Selling Shareholders will hold the shares before selling them or how many shares they will sell, and we currently have no agreements, arrangements or understandings with any of the Selling Shareholders regarding the sale of any of the Resale Shares.

This table is prepared solely based on information supplied to us by the Selling Shareholders, any Schedules 13D or 13G and Forms 3 and 4, and other public documents filed with the SEC. The applicable percentages of beneficial ownership are based on an aggregate of 7,350,768 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding on July 9, 2013.

Except as noted in the footnotes to the table below, to our knowledge, none of the Selling Shareholders has held any position or office or had any other material relationship with us or any of our predecessors or affiliates within the past three years other than as a result of the ownership of our securities. None of the Selling Shareholders is a broker-dealer of affiliate of a broker-dealer. See “Plan of Distribution” for additional information about the Selling Shareholders and the manner in which the Selling Shareholders may dispose of their shares. Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and generally means that a person has beneficial ownership of a security if he, she or it possesses sole or shares voting or investment power of that security, and includes option that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days. Our registration of these securities does not necessarily mean that the Selling Shareholders will sell any or all of the securities covered by this prospectus.

6163
 

Name of Shareholder Shares Beneficially Owned  Number of Shares  Number of Shares 
  Prior to Offering Number  Offered  Beneficially Owned After 
        Offering Percent 
Alder Capital Partners I, LP (2)  115,000(1)  115,000   0 
             
The Feinberg Family Trust (3)  352,942(1)  352,942   0 
             
Christopher F. Egan(4)  235,294(1)  235,294   0 
2002 Living Trust            
             
Melachdavid Inc (5)  425,632(6)  425,632   0 
             
GRQ Consultants Inc. (7)  317,093(6)  317,093   0 
             
John Lee Family Trust (8)  100,000(9)  100,000   0 
             
Wasatch Micro Value Fund (10)  150,000(11)  150,000   0 
             
The Del Mar Consulting            
Group, Inc. (12)  45,000(13)  45,000   0 

(1) RepresentsUNDERWRITING

Roth Capital Partners, LLC is acting as representative of the underwriters. Subject to the terms and conditions of an underwriting agreement between us and the representative, we have agreed to sell to each underwriter named below, and each underwriter named below has severally agreed to purchase, at the public offering price less the underwriting discounts set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, the number of shares purchasedof Common Stock listed next to its name in the March 2013 Private Placementfollowing table:

Underwriter

Number
Shares of

Common
Stock

Roth Capital Partners, LLC
Total

(2) Michael Licosati isThe underwriting agreement provides that the managing partner of Alder Capital Partners I, LP is authorized signatory of Alder Capital Partners I, LP and as such has voting and investment power over the securities owned by the selling stockholder. Michael Licosati disclaims beneficial ownership of these securities.

(3 Jeffrey Feinberg is the trusteeobligations of the Feinberg Family Trustunderwriters to pay for and as such has voting and investment power over the securities owned by the selling stockholder. Mr. Feinberg disclaims beneficial ownership over these shares.

(4) Christopher F. Egan is the trusteeaccept delivery of the Christopher F. Egan Living Trust and as such has voting and investment power over the securities owned by the selling stockholder Mr. Egan disclaims beneficial ownershipshares of these shares.

(5) Mark Grossman is President of Melachdavid, Inc. and as such has voting and investment power over the securities owned by the selling stockholder. Mr. Grossman disclaims beneficial ownership over these shares.

(6) Represents shares received pursuant to consulting agreements entered into in April 2012.

(7) Barry Honig is the President of GRQ Consultants, Inc. and as such has voting and investment power over the securities owned by the selling stockholder. Mr. Honig disclaims beneficial ownership over such shares. Does not include shares owned personally by Mr. Honig.

(8) John Lee is the Trustee of the John Lee Family Trust and as such has voting and investment power over the securities owned by the selling stockholder. Mr. Lee disclaims beneficial ownership over such shares.

(9) Represents shares purchased in the May 2013 Private Placement.

(10) Daniel Thurber is the Vice President of Wasatch Advisors, Inc., the Investment Advisor for Wasatch Funds Trust on behalf of Wasatch MicroCap Value Fund.

(11) Robert Prag is the beneficial owner of such Shares.

(12) Represents shares issued pursuant to a consulting agreement entered into in February 2013.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

The Selling Shareholders may sell the securitiesCommon Stock offered by this prospectus are subject to various conditions and representations and warranties, including the approval of certain legal matters by their counsel and other conditions specified in the underwriting agreement. The shares of Common Stock are offered by the underwriters, subject to prior sale, when, as and if issued to and accepted by them. The underwriters reserve the right to withdraw, cancel or modify the offer to the public and to reject orders in whole or in part. The underwriters are obligated to take and pay for all of the shares of Common Stock offered by this prospectus if any such shares of Common Stock are taken, other than those shares of Common Stock covered by the over-allotment option described below.

We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against specified liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, and to contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to make in respect thereof.

Over-Allotment Option

We have granted a 45-day option to the representative of the underwriters to purchase up to              additional shares of our Common Stock at a public offering price of $ per share, solely to cover over-allotments, if any. The underwriters may exercise this option for days from the date of this prospectus solely to cover sales of shares of Common Stock by the underwriters in excess of the total number of shares of Common Stock set forth in the table above. If any of these additional shares are purchased, the underwriters will offer the additional shares on the same terms as those on which the shares are being offered.

Discounts and Commissions; Expenses

The underwriters propose initially to offer the shares of Common Stock to the public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and to dealers at those prices less a concession not in excess of $ per share of Common Stock. If all of the shares of Common Stock offered by us are not sold at the public offering price, the underwriters may change the offering price and other selling terms by means of a supplement to this prospectus.

The following table shows the public offering price, underwriting discounts and commissions and proceeds before expenses to us. The information assumes either no exercise or full exercise of the over-allotment option we granted to the representative of the underwriters.

Per ShareTotal Without
Over-allotment
Option
Total With
Over-allotment
Option
Public offering price$$$
Underwriting discount (7%)$$$
Proceeds, before expenses, to us$$$

64

We have agreed to reimburse certain expenses of the underwriters relating to this offering as set forth in the underwriting agreement, including the fees and expenses of the underwriter’s legal counsel. However, the maximum amount we have agreed to reimburse the underwriter for their accountable expenses will not exceed $        .

Our total estimated expenses of the offering, including registration, filing and listing fees, printing fees and legal and accounting expenses, but excluding underwriting discounts and commissions, are approximately $        .

Lock-Up Agreements

Pursuant to “lock-up” agreements, we, our executive officers and directors, and certain holders of 5% or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, have agreed, without the prior written consent of the representative not to directly or indirectly, offer to sell, sell, pledge or otherwise transfer or dispose of any of shares of our Common Stock (or enter into any transaction or device that is designed to, or could be expected to, result in the transfer or disposition by any person at any time in the future of our Common Stock), enter into any swap or other derivatives transaction that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any of the economic benefits or risks of ownership of shares of our Common Stock, make any demand for or exercise any right or cause to be filed a registration statement, including any amendments thereto, with respect to the registration of any shares of Common Stock or securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for Common Stock or any other securities of ours or publicly disclose the intention to do any of the foregoing, subject to customary exceptions, for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus in the case of our directors, executive officers, the Company and any successor of the Company and 120 days after the date of this prospectus in the case of certain stockholders.

Pricing of this Offering

The public offering price for our Common Stock will be determined through negotiations between us and the underwriters. Among the factors to be considered in these negotiations will be prevailing market conditions, our financial information, market valuations of other companies that we and the underwriters believe to be comparable to us, estimates of our business potential, the present state of our development and other factors deemed relevant.

We offer no assurances that the public offering price of our Common Stock will correspond to the price at which our Common Stock will trade in the public market subsequent to this offering or that an active trading market for our Common Stock and warrants will develop and continue after this offering.

Discretionary Accounts

The underwriters do not intend to confirm sales of the shares of Common Stock offered hereby to any accounts over which they have discretionary authority.

Trading; Nasdaq Capital Market Listing

We have applied to list our Common Stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “      .” No assurance can be given that our application will be approved or that a trading market will develop. The listing of our Common Stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market is a condition to this offering. Our Common Stock is currently traded on the OTC Pink, under the symbol “MSLP.” On            , 2022, the last reported sale price of our Common Stock was $        per share.

Other

From time to time, certain of the underwriters and/or their affiliates may in the future provide, various investment banking and other financial services for us for which they may receive customary fees. In the course of their businesses, the underwriters and their affiliates may actively trade our securities or loans for their own account or for the accounts of customers, and, accordingly, the underwriters and their affiliates may at any time hold long or short positions in such securities or loans. Except for services provided in connection with this offering, no underwriter has provided any investment banking or other financial services to us during the 180-day period preceding the date of this prospectus and we do not expect to retain any underwriter to perform any investment banking or other financial services for at least 90 days after the date of this prospectus.

65

Price Stabilization, Short Positions and Penalty Bids

In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in transactions that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the price of our Common Stock. Specifically, the underwriters may over-allot in connection with this offering by selling more shares than are set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. This creates a short position in our Common Stock for its own account. The short position may be either a covered short position or a naked short position. In a covered short position, the number of shares of Common Stock over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the number of shares of Common Stock that they may purchase in the over-allotment option. In a naked short position, the number of shares of Common Stock involved is greater than the number of shares Common Stock in the over-allotment option. To close out a short position, the underwriters may elect to exercise all or part of the over-allotment option. The underwriters may also elect to stabilize the price of our Common Stock or reduce any short position by bidding for, and purchasing, Common Stock in the open market.

The underwriters may also impose a penalty bid. This occurs when a particular underwriter or dealer repays selling concessions allowed to it for distributing shares of Common Stock in this offering because the underwriter repurchases the shares of Common Stock in stabilizing or short covering transactions.

Finally, the underwriters may bid for, and purchase, shares of our Common Stock in market making transactions, including “passive” market making transactions as described below.

These activities may stabilize or maintain the market price of our Common Stock at a price that is higher than the price that might otherwise exist in the absence of these activities. The underwriters are not required to engage in these activities, and may discontinue any of these activities at any time without notice. These transactions may be effected on the national securities exchange on which our shares of Common Stock are traded, in the over-the-counter market, or otherwise.

Indemnification

We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against liabilities relating to this offering arising under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, liabilities arising from breaches of some or all of the representations and warranties contained in the underwriting agreement, and to contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to make for these liabilities.

Electronic Distribution

This prospectus in electronic format may be made available on websites or through other online services maintained by one or more of the following waysunderwriters, or by their affiliates. Other than this prospectus in electronic format, the information on any underwriter’s website and any information contained in any other website maintained by an underwriter is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved and/or endorsed by us or any underwriter in its capacity as underwriter, and should not be relied upon by investors.

Selling Restrictions

No action has been taken in any jurisdiction (except in the United States) that would permit a public offering of our Common Stock, or the possession, circulation or distribution of this prospectus or any other material relating to us or our Common Stock in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. Accordingly, our Common Stock may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, and this prospectus or any other offering material or advertisements in connection with our Common Stock may be distributed or published, in or from timeany country or jurisdiction, except in compliance with any applicable rules and regulations of any such country or jurisdiction.

66

European Economic Area

In relation to time:

directly to investors, including through a specific bidding, auctioneach member state of the European Economic Area, no offer of shares of our common stock which are the subject of the offering has been, or other process or in privately negotiated transactions;

to investors through agents;

directly to agents;

to or through brokers or dealers;

will be made to the public through underwriting syndicates led by onein that Member State, other than under the following exemptions under the Prospectus Directive:

(a)to any legal entity which is a qualified investor as defined in the Prospectus Directive;

(b)

to fewer than 150 natural or legal persons (other than qualified investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive), subject to obtaining the prior consent of the Representatives for any such offer; or

(c)in any other circumstances falling within Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive,

provided that no such offer of shares of our common stock referred to in (a) to (c) above shall result in a requirement for the Company, the selling shareholders or more managing underwriters;

any representative to one or more underwriters acting alone for resalepublish a prospectus pursuant to investors or to the public;

through a block trade in which the broker or dealer engaged to handle the block trade will attempt to sell the securities as agent, but may position and resell a portionArticle 3 of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;

through agents onProspectus Directive, or supplement a best-efforts basis; and

through a combination of any such methods of sale.

The Selling Shareholders may sell the Resale Sharesprospectus pursuant to this prospectus.  The Selling Shareholders may also sell all or a portionArticle 16 of the Resale SharesProspectus Directive.

Each person located in reliance upon Rule 144 under the Securities Act provided that they meet the criteria and conforma Member State to the requirementswhom any offer of that rule or by any other available means.

To the bestshares of our knowledge the Selling Shareholders have not entered intocommon stock is made or who receives any agreements, understandings or arrangements with any underwriters, broker-dealers or agents regarding the salecommunication in respect of any securities covered by this prospectus.

 Broker-dealers engaged by the Selling Shareholders may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the Selling Shareholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for Purchaseran offer of shares from Purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated, but, except as set forth in a supplement to this Prospectus, in the case of an agency transaction not in excess of a customary brokerage commission in compliance with FINRA Rule 2440; and in the case of a principal transaction a markup or markdown in compliance with FINRA IM-2440.

In connection with the sale of theour common stock, or interests therein, the Selling Shareholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may in turn engage in short saleswho initially acquires any shares of theour common stock in the course of hedging the positions they assume. The Selling Shareholders may also sell shares of the common stock short and deliver these securities to close out its short position, or loan or pledge the common stock to broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities. The Selling Shareholders may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or create one or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial institution of shares offered by this prospectus, which shares such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction).

The Selling Shareholders maywill be deemed underwritersto have represented, warranted, acknowledged and agreed to and with each Representative and the Company that (1) it is a “qualified investor” within the meaning of the Securities Actlaw in that Member State implementing Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive; and (2) in the case of any shares of our common stock acquired by it as a financial intermediary as that term is used in Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive, the shares of our common stock acquired by it in the offer have not been acquired on behalf of, nor have they been acquired with a view to their offer or resale to, persons in any Member State other than qualified investors, as that term is defined in the Prospectus Directive, or in circumstances in which the prior consent of the Representatives has been given to the offer or resale; or where shares of our common stock have been acquired by it on behalf of persons in any Member State other than qualified investors, the offer of those shares of our common stock to it is not treated under the Prospectus Directive as having been made to such persons.

The Company, the selling shareholders, the representatives and their respective affiliates will rely upon the truth and accuracy of the foregoing representations, acknowledgments and agreements.

This prospectus supplement has been prepared on the basis that any offer of shares of our common stock in any Member State will be made pursuant to an exemption under the Prospectus Directive from the requirement to publish a prospectus for offers of shares. Accordingly any person making or intending to make an offer in that Member State of shares of our common stock which are the subject of the offering contemplated in this prospectus supplement may only do so in circumstances in which no obligation arises for the Company, the selling shareholders or any of the representatives to publish a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive in relation to such offer. Neither the Company nor the representatives have authorized, nor do they authorize, the making of any offer of shares of our common stock in circumstances in which an obligation arises for the Company, the selling shareholders or the Representatives to publish a prospectus for such offer.

For the purposes of this provision, the expression an “offer of shares of our common stock to the public” in relation to any shares of our common stock in any Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and the shares of our common stock to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe the shares of our common stock, as the same may be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member State, the expression “Prospectus Directive” means Directive 2003/71/EC (as amended) and includes any relevant implementing measure in each Member State. The above selling restriction is in addition to any other selling restrictions set out below.

Notice to Prospective Investors in the United Kingdom

In addition, in the United Kingdom, this document is being distributed only to, and is directed only at, and any broker-dealers offer subsequently made may only be directed at persons who are “qualified investors” (as defined in the Prospectus Directive) (i) who have professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within Article 19 (5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended (the “Order”) and/or agents that(ii) who are involvedhigh net worth companies (or persons to whom it may otherwise be lawfully communicated) falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order (all such persons together being referred to as “relevant persons”). This document must not be acted on or relied on in sellingthe United Kingdom by persons who are not relevant persons. In the United Kingdom, any investment or investment activity to which this document relates is only available to, and will be engaged in with, relevant persons.

67

Notice to Prospective Investors in Switzerland

The shares of our common stock may not be publicly offered in Switzerland and will not be listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange (“SIX”) or on any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. This document has been prepared without regard to the disclosure standards for issuance prospectuses under art. 652a or art. 1156 of the Swiss Code of Obligations or the disclosure standards for listing prospectuses under art. 27 ff. of the SIX Listing Rules or the listing rules of any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. Neither this document nor any other offering or marketing material relating to the shares of our common stock or the offering may be deemedpublicly distributed or otherwise made publicly available in Switzerland.

Neither this document nor any other offering or marketing material relating to the offering, the Company, the shares of our common stock have been or will be “underwriters”filed with or approved by any Swiss regulatory authority. In particular, this document will not be filed with, and the offer of shares of our common stock will not be supervised by, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA (FINMA), and the offer of shares of our common stock has not been and will not be authorized under the Swiss Federal Act on Collective Investment Schemes (“CISA”). The investor protection afforded to acquirers of interests in collective investment schemes under the CISA does not extend to acquirers of shares of our common stock.

Notice to Prospective Investors in the Dubai International Financial Centre

This prospectus supplement relates to an Exempt Offer in accordance with the Offered Securities Rules of the Dubai Financial Services Authority (“DFSA”). This prospectus supplement is intended for distribution only to persons of a type specified in the Offered Securities Rules of the DFSA. It must not be delivered to, or relied on by, any other person. The DFSA has no responsibility for reviewing or verifying any documents in connection with Exempt Offers. The DFSA has not approved this prospectus supplement nor taken steps to verify the information set forth herein and has no responsibility for the prospectus supplement. The shares of our common stock to which this prospectus supplement relates may be illiquid and/or subject to restrictions on their resale. Prospective purchasers of the shares of our common stock offered should conduct their own due diligence on the shares of our common stock. If you do not understand the contents of this prospectus supplement you should consult an authorized financial advisor.

Notice to Prospective Investors in Australia

No placement document, prospectus, product disclosure statement or other disclosure document has been lodged with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (“ASIC”), in relation to the offering. This prospectus supplement does not constitute a prospectus, product disclosure statement or other disclosure document under the Corporations Act 2001 (the “Corporations Act”), and does not purport to include the information required for a prospectus, product disclosure statement or other disclosure document under the Corporations Act.

Any offer in Australia of the shares of our common stock may only be made to persons (the “Exempt Investors”) who are “sophisticated investors” (within the meaning of section 708(8) of the Corporations Act), “professional investors” (within the meaning of section 708(11) of the Corporations Act) or otherwise pursuant to one or more exemptions contained in section 708 of the Corporations Act so that it is lawful to offer the shares of our common stock without disclosure to investors under Chapter 6D of the Corporations Act.

The shares of our common stock applied for by Exempt Investors in Australia must not be offered for sale in Australia in the period of 12 months after the date of allotment under the offering, except in circumstances where disclosure to investors under Chapter 6D of the Corporations Act would not be required pursuant to an exemption under section 708 of the Corporations Act or otherwise or where the offer is pursuant to a disclosure document which complies with Chapter 6D of the Corporations Act. Any person acquiring shares of our common stock must observe such Australian on-sale restrictions.

This prospectus supplement contains general information only and does not take account of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person. It does not contain any securities recommendations or financial product advice. Before making an investment decision, investors need to consider whether the information in this prospectus supplement is appropriate to their needs, objectives and circumstances, and, if necessary, seek expert advice on those matters.

68

Notice to Prospective Investors in Hong Kong

The shares of our common stock have not been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold in Hong Kong, by means of any document, other than (a) to “professional investors” as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) of Hong Kong and any rules made under that Ordinance; or (b) in other circumstances which do not result in the document being a “prospectus” as defined in the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) of Hong Kong or which do not constitute an offer to the public within the meaning of that Ordinance. No advertisement, invitation or document relating to the shares of our common stock has been or may be issued or has been or may be in the possession of any person for the purposes of issue, whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere, which is directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be accessed or read by, the public of Hong Kong (except if permitted to do so under the securities laws of Hong Kong) other than with respect to shares of our common stock which are or are intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or only to “professional investors” as defined in the Securities Actand Futures Ordinance and any rules made under that Ordinance.

Notice to Prospective Investors in Japan

The shares of our common stock have not been and will not be registered under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan (Law No. 25 of 1948, as amended) and, accordingly, will not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, in Japan, or for the benefit of any Japanese Person or to others for re-offering or resale, directly or indirectly, in Japan or to any Japanese Person, except in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and ministerial guidelines promulgated by relevant Japanese governmental or regulatory authorities in effect at the relevant time. For the purposes of this paragraph, “Japanese Person” shall mean any person resident in Japan, including any corporation or other entity organized under the laws of Japan.

Notice to Prospective Investors in Singapore

This prospectus supplement has not been registered as a prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this prospectus supplement and any other document or material in connection with such sales. In such event,the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of shares of our common stock may not be circulated or distributed, nor may the shares of our common stock be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than (i) to an institutional investor under Section 274 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore (the “SFA”), (ii) to a relevant person pursuant to Section 275(1), or any commissions receivedperson pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in accordance with the conditions specified in Section 275, of the SFA, or (iii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA.

Where the shares of our common stock are subscribed or purchased under Section 275 of the SFA by such broker-dealersa relevant person which is:

(a)

a corporation (which is not an accredited investor (as defined in Section 4A of the SFA)) the sole business of which is to hold investments and the entire share capital of which is owned by one or more individuals, each of whom is an accredited investor; or

(b)

a trust (where the trustee is not an accredited investor) whose sole purpose is to hold investments and each beneficiary of the trust is an individual who is an accredited investor,

securities (as defined in Section 239(1) of the SFA) of that corporation or agentsthe beneficiaries’ rights and any profit oninterest (howsoever described) in that trust shall not be transferred within six months after that corporation or that trust has acquired the shares of our common stock pursuant to an offer made under Section 275 of the SFA except:

69

(c)

to an institutional investor or to a relevant person defined in Section 275(2) of the SFA, or to any person arising from an offer referred to in Section 275(1A) or Section 276(4)(i)(B) of the SFA;

(d)where no consideration is or will be given for the transfer;

(e)where the transfer is by operation of law;

(f)as specified in Section 276(7) of the SFA; or

(g)

as specified in Regulation 32 of the Securities and Futures (Offers of Investments) (Shares and Debentures) Regulations 2005 of Singapore.

Notice to Prospective Investors in Canada

The shares of our common stock may be sold only to purchasers purchasing, or deemed to be purchasing, as principal that are accredited investors, as defined in National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions or subsection 73.3(1) of the Securities Act (Ontario), and are permitted clients, as defined in National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations. Any resale of the shares purchased by them mayof our common stock must be deemed to be underwriting commissionsmade in accordance with an exemption from, or discounts under the Securities Act. The Selling Shareholders have informed the Company that they doin a transaction not have any written or oral agreement or understanding, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the common stock. In no event shall any broker-dealer receive fees, commissions and markups which, in the aggregate, would exceed five percent (5%).

Because the Selling Shareholders may be deemed “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act, they will be subject to, the prospectus delivery requirements of the applicable securities laws.

Securities Act including Rule 172 thereunder. In addition, any securities covered bylegislation in certain provinces or territories of Canada may provide a purchaser with remedies for rescission or damages if this prospectus which qualifysupplement (including any amendment thereto) contains a misrepresentation, provided that the remedies for sale pursuant to Rule 144 underrescission or damages are exercised by the Securities Act may be sold under Rule 144 rather than under this prospectus. There is no underwriter or coordinating broker acting in connection withpurchaser within the proposed saletime limit prescribed by the securities legislation of the resale shares by the Selling Shareholders.

We agreedpurchaser’s province or territory. The purchaser should refer to keep the registration statement that this prospectus forms a part of continuously effective under the Securities Act until all securities covered by such registration statement have been sold, or may be sold without the requirement to be in compliance with Rule 144(c)(1) and otherwise without restriction or limitation pursuant to Rule 144.

Under applicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person engaged in the distribution of the Resale Shares may not simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to the common stock for the applicable restricted period, as defined in Regulation M, prior to the commencement of the distribution. In addition, the Selling Shareholders will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of sharessecurities legislation of the common stockpurchaser’s province or territory for particulars of these rights or consult with a legal advisor.

Pursuant to section 3A.3 (or, in the case of securities issued or guaranteed by the Selling Shareholders or any other person. Wegovernment of a non-Canadian jurisdiction, section 3A.4) of National Instrument 33-105 Underwriting Conflicts (NI 33-105), the underwriters are not required to comply with the disclosure requirements of NI 33-105 regarding underwriter conflicts of interest in connection with this offering.

70

LEGAL MATTERS

Unless otherwise indicated, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, New York, New York, will make copies of this prospectus available topass upon the Selling Shareholders and have informed them of the need to deliver a copy of this prospectus to each purchaser at or prior to the time of the sale.

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the securities being offered byshares of our common stock to be sold in this prospectus beenoffering. Certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be passed upon for usthe underwriter by Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LL New York, New York.Pryor Cashman LLP.

71

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements of MusclePharm Corporation as of December 31, 2021, and for the yearsyear then ended, December 31, 2012 and 2011 appearingincluded in this prospectus have been audited by EKS&H LLLP and Berman & Company, P.A., bothMoss Adams LLP, independent registered public accounting firms,firm, as set forth in their reports thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and arereport which is included herein. Such consolidated financial statements have been so included in reliance upon such reports given on the authorityreport of such firmsfirm (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to a going concern uncertainty) given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.

Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

On September 14, 2012, following a competitive process undertakenThe consolidated financial statements of MusclePharm Corporation as of December 31, 2020 and for the year then ended have been audited by our audit committee in accordance with its charter, the audit committee approved the appointment of EKS&H LLLP, effective September 14, 2012, as ourSingerLewak LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. On September 14, 2012, EKS&H LLLP accepted the engagement.

During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2011,as stated in their report thereon (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and the subsequent interim period prior to the engagement of EKS&H LLLP, the Company did not consult EKS&H LLLP regarding (1) the application of accounting principlesincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to a specific completed or contemplated transaction, (2)going concern matter), and included in this Prospectus and Registration Statement in reliance upon such report and upon the typeauthority of audit opinion that might be rendered on our financial statements, or (3) any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement” (as such term is describedfirm as experts in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) or a “reportable event” with Berman & Company, P.A. (as such term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).accounting and auditing.

On September 18, 2012, our audit committee approved the dismissal of Berman & Company, P.A. as our independent registered public accounting firm.

72

Berman & Company, P.A.’s report on the financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle, except that the report contained a modification to the effect that there was substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and through September 18, 2012, there were no “disagreements” (as such term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K) with Berman & Company, P.A. on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Berman & Company, P.A., would have caused it to make reference thereto in their reports on the consolidated financial statements for such years.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011 and through September 18, 2012, there were no “reportable events” (as such term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the securities being offered by this prospectus. This prospectus does not contain all of the information in the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part and the exhibits to such registration statement. For further information with respect to us the Resale Shares by this prospectus, we refer you to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part and the exhibits to such registration statement. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or any other document are not necessarily complete, and in each instance, we refer you to the copy of the contract or other document incorporated by reference or filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a reporting companypart. Each of these statements is qualified in all respects by this reference.

You may read and file annual, quarterly and specialcopy the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, as well as our reports, proxy statements and other information, with the SEC. Copies of the reports and other information may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can request copies of such documents by writing toPlease call the SEC and paying a feeat 1-800-SEC-0330 for the copying cost. You may obtainmore information onabout the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.Room. The SEC maintains a weban Internet site at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding registrantsissuers that file electronically with the SEC.SEC, including MusclePharm Corporation The SEC’s Internet site can be found at http://www.sec.gov. You may also request a copy of these filings, at no cost, by writing us at MusclePharm Corporation, 6728 W. Sunset Rd., Suite 130, Las Vegas, NV 89118 or telephoning us at (800) 859-3010.

This prospectus is partWe are subject to the information and reporting requirements of a registration statement on Form S-1 that we filedthe Exchange Act, and, in accordance with this law, file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. CertainThese periodic reports, proxy statements and other information inare available for inspection and copying at the registration statement has been omitted fromSEC’s public reference facilities and the website of the SEC referred to above. We also maintain a website at www.musclepharm.com and www.musclepharmcop.com. You may access these materials free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Information contained on our website is not a part of this prospectus and the inclusion of our website address in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. We have also filed exhibits and schedules with the registration statement that are excluded from this prospectus. For further information you may:prospectus is an inactive textual reference only.

·read a copy of the registration statement, including the exhibits and schedules, without charge at the SEC’s Public Reference Room; or

·obtain a copy from the SEC upon payment of the fees prescribed by the SEC.

6573
 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Moss Adams LLP, Orange County, California, PCAOB ID: 659) F-2
ReportsReport of independent registered public accounting firmsIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm (SingerLewak LLP, Los Angeles, California, PCAOB ID: 00367)F-2F-4
Consolidated Financial Statements (1)
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020F-5
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020F-6
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020F-7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsF-9
  
Consolidated balance sheets atFinancial Statements as of March 31, 2022 and for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 and 2021
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2022 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012 and 20112021F-4F-39
Consolidated statementsStatements of operations and comprehensive incomeOperations for the yearsthree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20122022 and 20112021 (unaudited)F-5F-40
Consolidated statementsStatements of stockholders' equity (deficit)Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the yearsthree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20122022 and 20112021 (unaudited)F-6F-41
Consolidated statementsStatements of cash flowsCash Flows for the yearsthree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 20122022 and 20112021 (unaudited)F-7F-42
Notes to the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)(1)F-8F-43

EXPLANATORY NOTE

The foregoing notes to the consolidated financial statements have been revised with respect to the number of outstanding warrants, stock options, convertible notes and total common stock equivalents from those certain items as disclosed in the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and in the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2022 to correct certain typographical errors.

F-1

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders

of MusclePharm Corporation

Denver, Colorado

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of MusclePharm Corporation and subsidiarysubsidiaries (the "Company"“Company”) as of December 31, 2012, and2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, and comprehensive income, stockholders' equity (deficit),changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended. ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2021, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern Uncertainty

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. OurAs part of our audit included considerationwe are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements and assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of MusclePharm Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ EKS&H LLLP

March 29, 2013

Denver, Colorado

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of:

MusclePharm Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An

Our audit includesincluded performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. AnOur audit also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company utilizes various promotional activities, including product discounts, to generate revenue from contracts with customers. The costs of such activities are recorded as reduction in sales and are reflected in the transaction price when the related sale takes place. Reserves for trade promotions are established based on the Company’s best estimate of future and existing obligations for products sold as of the balance sheet date. The reserve for trade promotions is calculated using actual customer sales, actual promotional activities, and forecasted information for amounts earned, but not yet utilized. One customer accounted for a significant portion of promotional activities during the year ended December 31, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2021, revenue was reduced as a result of these various promotional activities with the customer. As of December 31, 2021, the reserve for trade promotions with the customer was zero.

F-2

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

Testing management’s process for determining the estimated trade promotion contra-asset by performing the following primary procedures –
Obtaining an understanding of management’s process for determining the customer specific trade promotions and discounts earned during the period and underlying methods and assumptions through inquiries and inspection of contracts and management’s calculation.
Evaluating the amounts of revenues and product discounts included in the estimate calculation to source documents.
Evaluating the methods used and reasonableness of significant assumptions by performing a look-back assessment to compare the significant assumptions used by management to actual customer discounts and projected gross revenue, including testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used.
Testing credit memos issued during the year ended December 31, 2021 to test the accuracy of the discounts taken by the customer during the year to reduce net revenue.
Developing an independent expectation for the balance of the estimate at the end of the year and comparing that independent estimate to management’s calculation.
Testing credit memos issued subsequent to the balance sheet date to test completeness of trade promotion and product discounts included in management’s estimate.

/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Orange County, California

April 15, 2022

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2021.

F-3

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of MusclePharm Corporation

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of MusclePharm Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes to the financial statement. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiarythe Company as of December 31, 2011 and 2010,2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the yearsyear then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Going Concern Matter

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 21 to the financial statements, the Company has a net loss of $23,280,950suffered recurring losses from operations, has an accumulated deficit and net cash used in operations of $5,801,761 for the year ended December 31, 2011; and has a working capital deficit of $13,693,267, and a stockholders’ deficit of $12,971,212 at December 31, 2011. These factors raiseits total liabilities exceed its total assets. This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s planplans in regardsregard to these matters is also are described in Note 2.1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

Berman & Company, P.A.Basis for Opinion

 

Boca Raton, Florida

April 13, 2012 except for Note 1 asThese financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to whichexpress an opinion on the date is June 28, 2012Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

551 NW 77th Street Suite 201Ÿ Boca Raton, FL 33487

Phone: (561) 864-4444Ÿ Fax: (561) 892-3715

www.Bermancpas.comŸ info@Bermancpas.com

RegisteredWe conducted our audit in accordance with the PCAOBŸMember AICPACenter standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for Audit Qualitythe purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Member American Institute

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of Certified Public Accountantsmaterial misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ SingerLewak LLP

We served as the Company’s auditor from 2019 to 2021.
Los Angeles, California

March 29, 2021

Member Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants

F-3F-4

 

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Consolidated Balance Sheets

  December 31, 
  2012  2011 
Assets        
Current Assets:        
Cash $-  $659,764 
Cash – restricted  9,148   - 
Accounts receivable – net  3,302,344   2,569,092 
Inventory  257,975   - 
Prepaid giveaways  358,800   - 
Prepaid stock compensation  44,748   534,456 
Prepaid sponsorship fees  6,249   203,333 
Deferred equity costs  698,500   - 
Other  272,117   50,188 
Total current assets  4,949,881   4,016,833 
Property and equipment – net  1,356,364   907,522 
Debt issue costs – net  335,433   68,188 
Other assets  125,049   53,585 
Total assets $6,766,727  $5,046,128 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit        
Current Liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $11,721,205  $9,359,073 
Customer deposits  336,211   8,047 
Debt – net  4,463,040   1,281,742 
Derivative liabilities  -   7,061,238 
Total Current Liabilities  16,520,456   17,710,100 
Long Term Liabilities:        
Debt – net  4,523   307,240 
Total Liabilities $16,524,979  $18,017,340 
Commitments and contingencies:        
Stockholders’ Deficit:        
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding  -   - 
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, Series B Preferred Stock, 51 shares authorized, 51 shares issued and outstanding  -   - 
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, 500 shares authorized, 190 and 190 issued none and 190 outstanding  -   - 
Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 2,778,404 and 712,860 issued and 2,747,308 and 712,860 outstanding  2,778   713 
Treasury Stock, at cost; 31,096 and zero shares  (460,978)  - 
Additional paid-in capital  54,817,341   32,184,756 
Accumulated deficit  (64,109,476)  (45,156,681)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (7,917)  - 
Total Stockholders’ Deficit  (9,758,252)  (12,971,212)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit $6,766,727  $5,046,128 

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2021  2020 
ASSETS        
Current assets:        
Cash $1,223  $2,003 
Accounts receivable, net  6,388   7,488 
Inventory  1,830   1,032 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  1,526   1,341 
Total current assets  10,967   11,864 
Property and equipment, net  5   13 
Intangible assets, net  35   356 
Operating lease right-of-use assets  203   474 
Other assets     295 
Total Assets $11,210  $13,002 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $17,980  $14,719 
Accrued and other liabilities  5,942   6,194 
Obligation under secured borrowing arrangement  6,446   7,098 
Line of credit     743 
Operating lease liability  342   381 
Senior notes payable  5,035    
Convertible notes with a related party  5,330   2,872 
Revolving line of credit, related party        
Total Current Liabilities  41,075   32,007 
Operating lease liability, long term     343 
Other long term liabilities  2,326   5,071 
Total Liabilities  43,401   37,421 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)  -     
Stockholders’ deficit:        
Preferred stock, 0 issued and outstanding      
Common stock, par value of $0.001 per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 33,386,200 and 33,980,905 shares issued as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively; and 33,386,200 and 33,105,284 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively   32   32 
Additional paid-in capital  183,355   178,261 
Treasury Stock at Cost, 875,621 shares   (10,039)  (10,039)
Accumulated deficit  (205,539)  (192,673)
Total Stockholders’ Equity  (32,191)  (24,419)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $11,210  $13,002 
(1)The foregoing financial statements have been revised with respect to the number of shares of common stock, shares of common stock held in treasury, warrants, stock options and convertible notes outstanding as of March 31, 2021 and December 31, 2021, respectively from the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. These revisions correct certain typographical errors.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-5

 

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except share and Comprehensive Incomeper share data)

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2012  2011 
Sales - net $67,055,215  $17,212,636 
Cost of sales  52,726,934   14,845,069 
Gross profit  14,328,281   2,367,567 
General and administrative expenses  23,064,092   18,587,727 
Loss from operations  (8,735,811)  (16,220,160)
Other expense        
Derivative expense  (4,409,214)  (4,777,654)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  5,899,968   5,162,100 
Loss on settlement of accounts payable, debt and conversion of Series C preferred stock (2012 only)  (4,447,732)  (3,862,458)
Interest expense  (7,335,070)  (3,711,278)
Foreign currency transaction gain  15,030   - 
Licensing income  10,000   250,000 
Other income (expense)  50,034   (121,500)
Total other expense  (10,216,984)  (7,060,790)
         
Net loss $(18,952,795) $(23,280,950)
         
Net loss available to common stockholders        
Net loss  (18,952,795)  (23,280,950)
Series C Preferred Stock dividend  -   (293)
Net loss available to common stockholders $(18,952,795) $(23,280,657)
Net income (loss) per share available to common stockholders – basic and diluted $(13.00) $(70.30)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period – basic and diluted  1,458,757   331,158 
         
Other comprehensive income        
Net change in Foreign currency translation  (7,917)  - 
Total other comprehensive income (loss)   (7,917)  - 
Total comprehensive income (loss) $(18,960,712) $(23,280,657)

  December 31,  December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Revenue, net $50,042  $64,440 
Cost of revenue  44,671   44,831 
Gross profit  5,371   19,609 
Operating expenses:        
Selling and promotion  4,393   3,888 
General and administrative  9,891   12,952 
Impairment of operating lease right-of-use assets  -   167 
Total operating expenses  14,284   17,007 
Income (loss) from operations  (8,913)  2,602 
Other (expense) income:        
Gain on settlements        
Loss on settlement of obligations  (2)  (95)
Gain on settlement of payables  

143

   1,687 
Interest expense  (5,460)  (1,493)
Other income, net  1,358   465 
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes  (12,874)  3,166 
Benefit for income taxes  (8)  (19)
Net income (loss) $(12,866) $3,185 
Net income (loss) per share, basic $(0.39) $0.10 
Net income (loss) per share, diluted supplementaly $(0.39) $0.08 
Weighted average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share, basic  33,363,321   32,812,462 
Weighted average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share, diluted  33,363,321   41,172,461 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-6

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

ConsolidatedStatement Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit

Years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011(In thousands, except share data)

        Series B  Series C                      
  Series A Convertible  Preferred  Convertible        Additional           Total 
  Preferred Stock  Stock  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Paid-  Treasury  Accumulated  Accumulated  Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  in Capital  Stock  Deficit  Translation  Deficit 
Balance - December 31, 2010  -  $-   -  $-   -  $-   139,585  $140  $20,130,631  $-  $(21,875,438) $-  $(1,744,667)
                                                     
Issuance of common and preferred stock:                                                    
Conversion of convertible debt  -   -   -   -   -   -   298,897   299   4,268,558   -   -   -   4,268,857 
Conversion of secured/unsecured debt  -   -   -   -   -   -   47,386   47   857,905   -       -   857,952 
Cash  -   -   -   -   -   -   96,471   96   874,904   -   -   -   875,000 
Cash  -   -   -   -   100   -   -   -   100,000   -   -   -   100,000 
Services - third parties  -   -   -   -   -   -   54,731   55   1,199,789   -   -   -   1,199,844 
Services - third parties  -   -   -   -   90   -   -   -   90,000   -   -   -   90,000 
Services - third parties - future services  -   -   -   -   -   -   4,706   5   214,245   -   -   -   214,250 
Extension of debt maturity date  -   -   -   -   -   -   11,030   11   161,239   -   -   -   161,250 
Settlement of accounts payable  -   -   -   -   -   -   64,172   64   3,646,655   -   -   -   3,646,719 
Cancellation of shares  -   -   -   -   -   -   (4,118)  (4)  4   -   -   -   - 
Share based payments - related parties  -   -   51   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Dividends on Series C Convertible Preferred Stock - related parties  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (293)  -   (293)
Reclassification of derivative liability to additional paid in capital  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   640,826   -       -   640,826 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (23,280,950)  -   (23,280,950)
                                                     
Balance - December 31, 2011  -   -   51   -   190   -   712,860   713   32,184,756   -   (45,156,681)  -   (12,971,212)
                                                     
Issuance of common and preferred stock:                                                    
Conversion of preferred shares  -   -   -   -   (190)  -   22,353   22   614,962   -   -   -   614,984 
Conversion of secured/unsecured debt  -   -   -   -   -   -   290,961   290   1,420,132   -       -   1,420,422 
Cash  -   -   -   -   -   -   199,422   199   1,660,561   -   -   -   1,660,760 
Interest  -   -   -   -   -   -   58,945   58   334,040   -   -   -   334,098 
Services - third parties  -   -   -   -   -   -   113,740   113   1,107,605   -   -   -   1,107,718 
Executive/board compensation  -   -   -   -   -   -   431,034   431   4,686,083   -   -   -   4,686,514 
Warrant conversions/settlements  -   -   -   -   -   -   853,082   853   7,294,914   -   -   -   7,295,767 
Forbearance of agreement terms  -   -   -   -   -   -   95,528   95   1,239,939   -   -   -   1,240,033 
Treasury shares purchased  -   -   -   -   -   -   (31,096)          (460,978)  -   -   (460,978)
Additional shares from roundup of split shares  -   -   -   -   -   -   479   4   (4)  -   -   -   - 
Employee stock awards  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   149,966   -   -   -   149,966 
Reclassification of derivative liability to additional paid in capital  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   4,124,387   -           4,124,387 
Translation gain/loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -       (7,917)  (7,917)
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (18,952,795)      (18,952,795)
                                                     
Balance - December 31, 2012  -  $-   51  $-   -  $-   2,747,308  $2,778  $54,817,341  $(460,978) $(64,109,476) $(7,917) $(9,758,252)
           `             
  Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Additional Paid-  Treasury  Accumulated  Total Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  In Capital  Stock  Deficit  Deficit 
Balance - December 31, 2019        33,000,412   31   177,914   (10,039)  (195,858)- (27,952)
Forfeiture of unvested restricted stock        (121,850)            -  
Stock-based compensation for issuance and amortization of restricted stock awards to employees, executives, and directors              144        144 
Issuance of shares for services        226,722   1   203        204 
Net Income                    3,185 - 3,185 
Balance- December 31, 2020        33,105,284   32   178,261   (10,039)  (192,673)(192,673)  (24,419)
Stock-based compensation for issuance and amortization of restricted stock awards to employees, executives, and directors        280,916      653        653 
Warrants issued with debt offering              4,441        4,441 
Net loss                    (12,866)- (12,866)
Net income (loss)                    (12,866)- (12,866)
Balance - December 31, 2021        33,386,200  $32  $183,355  $(10,039) $(205,539)(205,539)$(32,191)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements.

Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2012  2011 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:        
         
Net loss $(18,952,795) $(23,280,950)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation  475,320   171,587 
Bad debt  9,490   120,477 
Warrants issued for services – third parties  -   1,989,982 
Stock issued for services – third parties  -   1,289,844 
Stock issued to extend maturity date of debt  -   161,250 
Amortization of prepaid stock compensation and athlete endorsement stock payments  715,661   1,745,705 
Amortization of debt discount  6,122,006   3,237,219 
Amortization of debt issue costs  394,964   229,499 
Amortization of deferred compensation  149,966   - 
Loss on settlement of accounts payable  -   2,123,129 
Additional consideration given for early debt retirement  779,500   - 
Loss on conversion of debt  351,021   1,739,329 
Loss on conversion of preferred shares  614,984   - 
Loss on conversion of warrants  315,364   - 
Loss on repayment of debt  1,196,321   - 
Derivative expense  4,409,214   4,777,654 
Executive compensation  231,833   - 
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  (5,899,968)  (5,162,100)
         
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
(Increase) decrease in:        
Restricted cash balance  (9,148)  - 
Accounts receivable  (742,742)  (2,262,808)
Prepaid and other  (16,098)  (203,333)
Deferred equity costs  (698,500)  - 
Inventory and prepaid giveaways  (616,775)  - 
Other  -   7,877 
Increase (decrease) in:        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  10,144,621   7,581,564 
Customer deposits  328,164   (67,686)
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities  (697,597)  (5,801,761)
         
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:        
Purchase of property and equipment  (924,162)  (831,511)
Purchase of other assets  (41,165)  - 
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities  (965,327)  (831,511)
         
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:        
Proceeds from issuance of debt  5,823,950   6,612,900 
Debt issuance costs  (234,450)  (263,283)
Repayment of debt  (5,847,575)  (75,285)
Repurchase of common stock (treasury stock)  (460,978)  - 
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock  -   100,000 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants – net of recapitalization payment  1,660,760   875,000 
Cash overdraft  69,370   - 
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities $1,011,077  $7,249,332 
Effects of foreign currency translation:        
Foreign currency translation loss  (7,917)  - 
Net (decrease) increase in cash  (659,764)  616,060 
Cash at beginning of period  659,764   43,704 
         
Cash at end of period $-  $659,764 
         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:        
Cash paid for interest $501,165  $28,806 
         
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:        
Stock issued for future services - third parties $1,107,719  $214,250 
Non cash increase in accounts payable related to future services to be paid for with common   stock $-  $100,000 
Warrants issued in conjunction with debt issue costs $427,759  $- 
Debt discount recorded on convertible and unsecured debt accounted for as a derivative liability $3,554,672  $5,473,291 
Stock issued to settle accounts payable and accrued interest – third parties $1,392,143  $1,440,779 
Conversion of convertible debt and accrued interest for common stock $1,069,402  $3,387,480 
Stock issued for interest $334,099  $- 
Stock issued to settle accrued executive compensation $4,667,764  $- 
Stock issued for board member compensation $18,750  $- 
Reclassification of derivative liability to additional paid in capital and warrant settlements (2012 only) $9,784,748  $640,826 
Stock issued to acquire equipment $-  $82,811 
Auto acquired through financing $-  $26,236 
Dividends on Series C Preferred Stock – related parties $-  $293 
Stock issued to settle contracts $3,932  $- 
Stock issued to settle accrued liabilities $384,500  $- 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7

MusclePharm Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

  2021  2020 
  For the Year Ended 
  December 31, 
  2021  2020 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES        
Net income/(loss) $(12,866) $3,185 
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment  10   145 
Amortization of intangible assets  321   320 
Bad debt expense  475  172 
Gain on disposal of property and equipment     (160)
Gain on settlement of payables  (143)  (1,687)
Provision for inventory write down  (96)   
Stock-based compensation  653   144 
Stock issued to nonemployees     204 
Impairment of operating lease right-of-use assets     167 
Amortization of debt issue cost  368    
OID Interest  498    
Amortization of debt discount  1,928    
Gain on extinguishment of Paycheck Protection Program Loan  (965)   
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable, net  625   (2,852)
Inventory  (702)  3,687 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  480   (39)
Operating lease assets and liabilities        
Accounts payable        
Right of use asset and other assets     549 
Accounts payable  3,261    
Other long-term liabilities  (1,780)   
Accrued and other liabilities  (109)  (4,703)
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities  (8,042)  (868)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Purchase of property and equipment  (2)  (4)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment     222 
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities  (2)  218 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from line of credit     1,243 
Payments on lines of credit     (3,465)
Proceeds from secured borrowing arrangement, net of reserves  49,060   46,377 
Payments to secured borrowing arrangement, net of fees  (49,713)  (43,722)
Proceeds from revolving line of credit, related party        
Payments on revolving line of credit, related party        
Proceeds from convertible shareholder’s loan  2,458    
Proceeds from issuance of Paycheck Protection Program Loan     965 
Proceeds from senior notes payable and warrants  7,050    
Debt issuance costs  (848)   
Repayment of notes payable  (743)  (277)
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities  7,264   1,121 
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (780)  471 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period  2,003   1,532 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $1,223  $2,003 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Cash paid for interest $3,126  $1,437 
Cash paid for taxes  40   39 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-8

 

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)dollars in thousands, unless otherwise indicated)

 

Note 1: Nature1. Description of Operations and BasisBusiness

Description of PresentationBusiness

Nature of Operations

MusclePharm Corporation, and consolidated subsidiarytogether with its subsidiaries (the “Company”, “we”, “our”, or “MP”“MusclePharm”) was incorporatedis a scientifically-driven, performance lifestyle company that develops, markets and distributes branded sports nutrition products and nutritional

supplements that are manufactured by the Company’s contract manufacturers. The Company’s portfolio of recognized brands, including MusclePharm, FitMiss and MP Combat Energy is marketed and sold globally. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had the following wholly-owned subsidiary which did not have any operations or assets as of and for the years ended December 31, 2021 or 2020: MusclePharm Canada Enterprises Corp.

In 2021, the Company announced its entrance into the functional energy space with former Rockstar Energy executives. The Company launched three flavors of MP Combat Energy in September 2021 for domestic distribution and three additional flavors for international distribution. The Company believes with the launch of its new energy products, reductions in operating costs and continued focus on gross profit and revenue growth will allow it to ultimately achieve sustained profitability. However, the Company can give no assurances that this will occur, especially with the cost to launch new energy products along with the recent increase in the Statecost of Nevadaprotein, which may have a material impact on August 4, 2006, under the name ToneCompany’s profitability. Additionally, the Company’s profitability may be materially impacted by the ability of the Company’s contract manufacturers to meet customers’ demands. Although, the Company believes entering the functional energy space will help to increase sales and gross margin, and reduce exposure to commodity prices, the Company can give no assurances that this will occur. To manage cash flow, the Company has entered into multiple financing arrangements. The entry into the Energy Drink business has created a second segment, which is presented in Twenty, fordetail in Note 18.

Information About Our Segments

We are engaged in global sales of products that fall into two operating segments: Protein Products and Energy Drinks. Information regarding our operating segments and geographic and product information is contained in Note 18 to these consolidated financial statements.

Going Concern

The Company has historically incurred significant losses and experienced negative cash flows since inception. As of December 31, 2021, the purposeCompany had cash of engaging$1.2million, a working capital deficit of $30.1 million, a stockholders’ deficit of $32.2 million and an accumulated deficit of $205.5 million resulting from recurring losses from operations. As a result of a history of losses and financial condition, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon it generating profits in the future and/or obtaining the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay liabilities arising from normal business of providing personal fitness training using isometric techniques.operations when they come due. The Company is headquarteredevaluating different strategies to obtain financing to fund its operations to cover expenses and focus on achieving a level of revenue adequate to support its current cost structure. Financing strategies may include, but are not limited to, private placements of capital stock, debt borrowings, partnerships and/or collaborations.

The Company has been focused on cost containment and improving gross margins by focusing on customers with higher margins, reducing product discounts and promotional activity, along with reducing the number of SKU’s and negotiating improved pricing for raw materials. In addition, the Company has worked to negotiate lower production costs with its contract manufacturers. Although these steps improved gross margins through the first quarter of 2021, with the recent increases in Denver, Colorado.commodity prices, primarily protein, the Company’s gross margins have been impacted and will continue to be impacted unless commodity prices return the same levels that were seen in 2020.

F-9

 

MusclePharm currently manufactures

COVID-19

The Company’s results of operations are affected by economic conditions, including macroeconomic conditions and levels of business confidence. There continues to be significant volatility and economic uncertainty in many markets and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic contributes to that level of volatility and uncertainty and has created economic disruption. The Company is actively managing its business to respond to the impact. There were no adjustments recorded in the financial statements that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

The ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s operations is unknown and will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak, new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, and any additional preventative and protective actions that governments, or the Company, may direct, which may result in an extended period of continued business disruption, reduced customer traffic and reduced operations. Any resulting financial impact cannot be reasonably estimated at this time but may have a wide-ranging varietymaterial impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of high-quality sports nutrition products.operations. Management continues to monitor the business environment for any significant changes that could impact the Company’s operations. The Company has taken proactive steps to manage costs and discretionary spending, such as remote working and reducing facility related expense.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for financial information and with the rulesinstructions to Form 10-K and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

Regulation S-X. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MusclePharm Corporationthe Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary MusclePharm Canada Enterprises Corp(“MusclePharm Canada”). MusclePharm Canada began operations in April of 2012.wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accountsbalances and transactions between Musclepharm Corporation and MusclePharm Canada have been eliminated uponin consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities atdisclosed in the date of theconsolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates include, but are not limited to, allowance for doubtful accounts, revenue discounts and allowances, the reported amountsvaluation of revenues and expenses duringinventory, the reporting period.

Making estimates requires management to exercise significant judgment. It is at least reasonably possible that the estimatecalculation of the effectCompany’s effective tax rate and deferred tax assets, valuation of a condition, situation or setstock based compensation, warrants, the assessment of circumstances that existed at the dateuseful lives, recoverability and valuation of the financial statements, which management considered in formulating its estimate could change in the near term due to one or more future non-conforming events. Accordingly, the actuallong-lived assets, likelihood and range of possible losses on contingencies and present value of lease liabilities. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Risks and UncertaintiesCash

The Company operates in an industry that is subject to rapid change and intense competition. The Company’s operations will be subject to significant risk and uncertainties including financial, operational, technological, regulatory and other risks, including the potential risk of business failure.

Management’s Plans with Respect to Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s management believes that with increased sales expansion and the opening of the Franklin, Tennessee distribution center, there will be opportunities to increase sales; however, the Company may need to continue to raise capital in order execute the business plan, which includes buying more inventory and broadening the sales platform. There can be no assurance that such capital will be available on acceptable terms or at all. See Note 12 for subsequent events related to the Company’s capital raising efforts.

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instrumentsinvestments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase and money market accounts to be cash equivalents. AtAs of December 31, 20122021 and 2011,2020, the Company had no0 cash equivalents.equivalents and all cash amounts consisted of cash on deposit.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable represents trade obligations from customers that are subject to normal trade collection terms and are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of any sales discounts and allowance for doubtful accounts, and do not typically bear interest. The Company assesses the collectability of the accounts by taking into consideration the aging of accounts receivable, changes in customer credit worthiness, general market and economic conditions, and historical experience. Bad debt expenses are recorded as part of “General and administrative” expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company reserves the receivable balance against the allowance when management determines a balance is uncollectible. The Company also reviews its customer discounts, and an accrual is made for discounts earned but not yet utilized at each period end.

F-10

 

The Company performs ongoing evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and generally does not require collateral. Some international customers are required to pay for their orders in advance of shipment. Accounts receivable consisted of the following as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):

Schedule of Accounts Receivable

       
  As of December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Accounts receivable $7,028  $10,895 
Less: allowance for discounts and returns  (235)  (2,525)
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts  (405)  (882)
Accounts receivable, net $6,388  $7,488 

The allowance for discounts and returns consisted of the following activity for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):

Schedule of Allowance for Discount and Return

  2021  2020 
  As of December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Allowance for discounts and returns, beginning balance $2,525  $2,901 
Charges against revenues  9,259   17,703 
Utilization of Reserve  (11,549)  (18,079)
Allowance for discounts and returns, ending balance $235  $2,525 

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods is transferred to the Company’s customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods.

a.Nature of Goods

The Company sells a variety of protein products and energy drinks through a broad distribution platform that includes supermarkets, mass merchandisers, wholesale clubs, drugstores, convenience stores, home stores, specialty stores and websites and other e-commerce channels, all of which sell products to consumers.

b.When Performance Obligations are Satisfied

For performance obligations related to the shipping and invoicing of products, control transfers at the point in time upon which finished goods are delivered to the Company’s customers or when finished goods are picked up by a customer or a customer’s carrier, depending on shipping terms. Once a product has been delivered or picked up by the customer, the customer is able to direct the use of, and obtain substantially all of the remaining benefits from, the asset. The Company considers control to have transferred upon delivery or customer receipt because the Company has an enforceable right to payment at that time, the customer has legal title to the asset, the Company has transferred physical possession of the asset, and the customer has significant risk and rewards of ownership of the asset.

c.Variable Consideration

The Company conducts extensive promotional activities with its largest customer, primarily through the use of off-list discounts, coupons, cooperative advertising, periodic price reduction arrangements, and end-aisle and other in-store displays. The costs of such activities are netted against sales and are recorded over the calendar year, in proportion to sales recorded during that calendar year. The reserves for sales returns and consumer and trade promotion liabilities are established based on the Company’s best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing obligations for products sold as of the balance sheet date. To determine the appropriate timing of recognition of consideration payable to a customer, all consideration payable to customers is reflected in the transaction price at inception and reassessed routinely.

F-11

d.Practical Expedients

The Company expenses incremental direct costs of obtaining a contract (broker commissions) when the related sale takes place, since the amortization period of the commissions paid for the sale of products is less than a year. These costs are recorded in “Selling and promotion” expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company accounts for shipping and handling costs as fulfillment activities which are therefore recognized upon shipment of the goods.

Shipping and handling costs related to inbound purchases of raw material and finished goods are included in cost of revenues in the consolidated statements of operations and capitalized into the value of inventory on the balance sheet. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company incurred $1.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively, of inbound shipping and handling costs. Shipping and handling costs related to shipments to customers is included in “general and administrative” expense in the consolidated statements of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company incurred $3.1 million and $2.5 million, respectively, of shipping and handling costs related to shipments to customers.

The Company excludes from its revenue any amounts collected from customers for sales (and similar) taxes. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recorded discounts, and to a lesser degree, sales returns, totaling $9.3 million and $17.7 million, respectively, which accounted for 16% and 22% of gross revenue in each period, respectively.

Disaggregation of Revenue

The following shows the disaggregation of revenue by distribution channel for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands).

Schedule of Disaggregation of Revenue

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2021  % of Total  2020  % of Total 
Distribution Channel                
Specialty $20,144   40% $26,643   41%
International $15,233   30% $17,862   28%
FDM $14,665   30% $19,935   31%
Total $50,042   100% $64,440   100%

Concentrations

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and accounts receivable. The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The cash balance at times may exceed federally insured limits. AtManagement believes the financial risk associated with these balances is minimal and has not experienced any losses to date. Significant customers and vendors are those that represent more than 10% of the Company’s net revenue or accounts receivable for each period presented.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, there were no balances2021, we had three customers who individually accounted for 38%, 14% and 13% of our net revenue, and one customer that exceededaccounted for 22% of accounts receivable. During the federally insured limit. Atyear ended December 31, 2011, there was2020, we had three customers who individually accounted for 41%, 17% and 12% of our net revenue, and one accountcustomer that hadaccounted for 61% of accounts receivable. Sales to our largest customer are aggregated to present net revenue for their locations worldwide.

F-12

The Company uses a balance that exceeded the federally insured limit by approximately $378,000.

Accounts Receivablelimited number of non-affiliated suppliers for contract manufacturing its products. The Company has quality control and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable represents trade obligations from customers thatmanufacturing agreements in place with its primary manufacturers to ensure consistency in production and quality. The agreements ensure products are subject to normal trade collection terms. The accounts receivable are sent directlymanufactured to the Company’s third party manufacturerspecifications and netted with any outstanding liabilitiesthe contract manufacturers will bear the costs of recalled products due to defective manufacturing. During the manufacturer. Liabilities to the manufacturer totaled $4,224,562 and $2,100,214 atyear ended December 31, 20122021, the Company had three vendors who individually accounted for 26%, 19% and 2011, respectively,9% of net purchases, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company had three vendors who individually accounted for 25%, 24% and are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. 13% of net purchases.

The Company periodically evaluateshas a geographic concentration in the collectabilityUnited States, with 70% and 72% of its accounts receivablerevenue from domestic customers during the years ended December 31, 2021 and considers2020, respectively. International customers, primarily in Canada and Asia, comprised 30% and 28% for the need to establish an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon historical collection experienceyears ended December 31, 2021 and specific customer information. Accordingly, the actual amounts could vary from the recorded allowances. There is also a review of customer discounts at the period end and an accrual made for discounts earned but not yet received by quarter end.

2020, respectively. The Company does not charge interesthad sales on past due receivables. Receivables areall continents, other than Antarctica, and no other country had sales greater than 5% of revenue, net.

Inventory

Inventory consists of finished goods and raw materials used to manufacture the Company’s products by one of our contract manufacturers as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. The Company records charges for obsolete and slow-moving inventory based on the age of the product as determined by the expiration date or otherwise determined to be past due based onobsolete. Products within one year of their expiration dates are considered for write-off purposes. Inventory write-downs, once established, are not reversed as they establish a new cost basis for the payment terms ofinventory. Historically, the original invoices. Accounts receivable consisted ofCompany has had minimal returns with established customers. The Company incurred insignificant inventory write-offs during the following atyears ended December 31, 20122021 and 2011:2020. The Company accounts for its inventory on a First-in First-out basis.

  As of
December 31,
2012
  As of
December 31,
2011
 
Accounts receivable $4,416,193  $2,766,776 
Less: allowance for discounts  (1,088,720)  - 
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts  (25,129)  (197,684)
Accounts receivable – net $3,302,344  $2,569,092 

At December 31, 2012Prepaid Expenses and 2011,Other Current Assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of various payments the Company had the following concentrations of accounts receivable with

customers:

Customer 2012  2011 
A  24%  36%
B  20%  7%
C  6%  12%
D  1%  10%

Inventory

Inventory is valued at the lower of costhas made in advance for goods or market value. Product-related inventories are primarily maintained using the average cost method.

Prepaid Giveaways

Prepaid giveaways represents non-inventory sample items which are given away to aid in promotion of the brand.

Prepaid Sponsorship Fees

Prepaid sponsorship fees represents fees paid in connection with future advertisingservices to be received.MusclePharm Corporationreceived in the future. These prepaid expenses include legal retainers, giveaways, print advertising, insurance and Subsidiaryservice contracts requiring up-front payments.

F-9

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

Prepaid Stock Compensation

Prepaid stock compensation represents amounts paid with stock in connection with future contractual benefits to be received. The Company amortizes these contractual benefits over the life of the contracts using the straight-line method.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated to their estimated residual valueless accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over theirthe estimated useful lives.lives of the respective assets. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed, of, the assets and related accumulated depreciation are relieved from the accountsremoved, and the resulting gains or losses are included in operating incomerecorded in the statementsstatement of operations. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is provided using

The estimated useful lives of the straight-line method for all property and equipment.equipment are as follows:

Schedule of Estimated Useful Lives of Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property and EquipmentEstimated Useful Life
Furniture, fixtures and equipment3 - 7 years
Manufacturing and lab equipment3 - 5 years
Vehicles3 - 5 years

Deferred Equity CostsIntangible Assets

Costs associated with equity offeringsAcquired intangible assets are initially classified as deferred equity costs until moneys are received from the salerecorded at estimated fair value, net of equity shares. Upon receipt of funds, the Company nets any deferred equity costs against the gross proceeds recorded as equity.

Website Development Costs

Costs incurred in the planning stage of a website are expensed, whileaccumulated amortization, and costs incurred in obtaining certain trademarks are capitalized, and are amortized over their related useful lives, using a straight-line basis consistent with the development stageunderlying expected future cash flows related to the specific intangible asset.

Costs to renew or extend the life of intangible assets are capitalized and amortized over the remaining useful life of the asset. Amortization expenses are included as a component of “General and administrative” expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The estimated useful life of the asset.intangible assets is 7 years.

F-13

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews long-livedLong-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances such as service discontinuance or technological obsolescence,exist that indicate that the carrying amount of the long-livedan asset may not be recoverable. When such events occur, the Company comparesindicators of impairment exist, an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows is used in measuring whether the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted expected future cash flowsor related to the asset. If the comparison indicates that impairmentasset group is present,recoverable. Measurement of the amount of the impairment, if any, is calculated asbased upon the difference between the excess ofasset’s carrying value and estimated fair value. There was 0 impairment for the carrying amount over the fair value of the asset. If a readily determinable market price does not exist, fair value is estimated using discounted expected cash flows attributable to the asset. During the yearsyear ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded no impairment expense.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

2021. The Company measureshad a $0.167 million impairment of operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities atduring the year ended December 31, 2020.

Fair Value

GAAP defines fair value based on an expected exitas the exchange price which represents the amount that would be received on the sale offrom selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability asin the case may be,principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such,participants on the measurement date. The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities at fair value may be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricingat each reporting period using an asset or liability. The authoritative guidance onestimated fair value measurements establishes a consistent framework forhierarchy which requires the Company to use observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

A financial instrument’s classification within the fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis whereby inputs, used in valuation techniques, are assigned a hierarchical level.

The following arehierarchy is based upon the hierarchicallowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Three levels of inputs may be used to measure fair value:

·Level 1:1 — Observable inputs that reflectare unadjusted quoted prices (unadjusted)in active markets for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.liabilities;

·Level 2: Inputs reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that2 — Observable inputs are not active; quoted prices for similar assets orand liabilities in active markets;markets or inputs other than quoted prices thatwhich are observable for the assets or liabilities;liabilities, either directly or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observableindirectly through market data by correlation or other means.corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments; and

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

·Level 3:3 — Unobservable inputs reflectingwhich are supported by little or no market activity and which are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. These inputs are based on the Company’s assumptions incorporated in valuation techniques used to determinemeasure assets and liabilities at fair value. These assumptions are required to be consistent with market participant assumptions that are reasonably available.value and require significant management judgment or estimation.

The following aredetermination of where assets and liabilities fall within this hierarchy is based upon the major categorieslowest level of liabilities measured atinput that is significant to the fair value onmeasurement.

Leases

A lease is defined as a recurring basis ascontract, or part of December 31, 2012 and 2011, using quoted pricesa contract, that conveys the right to control the use of identified assets for a period of time in active marketsexchange for identical liabilities (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3): 

  As of December 31, 
  2012  2011 
         
Derivative liabilities (Level 2) $-  $7,061,238 

The Company’s financial instruments consisted primarily of accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and debt. The Company’s debt approximates fair value based upon current borrowing rates availableconsideration. An entity controls the use when it has a right to the Company for debt with similar maturities. The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments generally approximated their fair values as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Revenue Recognition

The Company records revenue whenobtain substantially all of the following have occurred: (1) persuasive evidencebenefits from the use of the identified asset and has the right to direct the use of the asset. The Company determines if an arrangement exists, (2) product has been shippedis a lease at contract inception. For all classes of underlying assets, the Company includes both the lease and non-lease components as a single component and accounts for it as a lease. Lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date.

MusclePharm calculates and uses the rate implicit in the lease if the information is readily available, or delivered, (3)if not available, the sales priceCompany uses its incremental borrowing rate in determining the present value of lease payments. Lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets are based on the lease liability, subject to adjustments, such as lease incentives. The ROU assets also include any lease payments made at or before the customer iscommencement date. MusclePharm excludes variable lease payments in measuring lease assets and lease liabilities, other than those that depend on an index or a rate or are in substance fixed payments.

The Company’s lease terms include options to extend or determinable, and (4) collectabilityterminate the lease when it is reasonably assured.certain that such options will be exercised. Operating leases are included in “Operating lease right-of-use assets,” “Operating lease liability, current” and “Operating lease liability, long-term” on the consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases are included in “Property and equipment, net,” “Accrued and other liabilities” and “Other long-term liabilities” on the consolidated balance sheets.

Depending on individual customer agreements, sales are recognized either upon shipmentCost of products to customers or upon delivery. For oneRevenue

Cost of our largest domestic customers (See customer “B” below under concentrations), which represents 12% and 14% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, revenue is recognized upon delivery.

The Company has determined that advertising related credits that were granted to customers fell within the guidance of ASC No. 605-50-55 (“Revenue Recognition” – Customer Payments and Incentives – Implementation Guidance and Illustrations) . The guidance indicates that, absent evidence of benefit to the vendor, appropriate treatment requires netting these types of payments against revenues and not expensing as advertising expense.

The Company records store support, giveaways, sales allowances and discounts as a direct reduction of sales. The Company grants volume incentive rebates to certain customers based on contractually agreed percentages once certain thresholds have been met. These volume incentive rebates are recorded as a direct reduction to sales.

Sales for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 are as follows: 

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2012  2011 
Sales $77,768,138  $21,197,518 
         
Discounts  (10,712,923)  (3,984,882)
         
Sales – Net $67,055,215  $17,212,636 

The Company has an informal 7-day right of return for products. There were nominal returns for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had the following concentrations of revenues with customers:

Concentrations Year Ended December 31, 
Customer 2012  2011 
         
A  33%  41%
         
B  12%  14%

F-11

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

Licensing Income and Royalty Revenue

On May 5, 2011, the Company granted an exclusive indefinite license to a third party for $250,000. The licensee may market, manufacture, design and sell the Company’s existing apparel line. The licensee is obligated to pay the Company a 10% net royalty based on its net income at the end of each fiscal year. To date, no royalty revenue has been earned.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales represents costs directly related to the production, manufacturing and freightfreight-in of the Company’s products.products purchased from contract manufacturers.

F-14

 

Shipping

Advertising and HandlingPromotion

Domestic products soldOur advertising and promotion expenses consist primarily of digital, print and media advertising, athletic endorsements and sponsorships, promotional giveaways, trade show events and various partnering activities with our retail partners, and are shipped directlyexpensed as incurred.

Share-Based Payments and Stock-Based Compensation

Share-based compensation awards, including stock options and restricted stock awards, are recorded at estimated fair value on the applicable awards’ grant date, based on the estimated number of awards that are expected to vest. The grant date fair value is amortized on a straight-line basis over the time in which the awards are expected to vest, or immediately if no vesting is required. Share-based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services are also recorded at fair value on the grant date. The fair value of restricted stock awards is based on the fair value of the stock underlying the awards on the grant date as there is no exercise price.

The fair value of stock options is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The determination of the fair value of each stock award using this option-pricing model is affected by the Company’s assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the customerexpected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and the expected term of the awards based on an analysis of the actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors and the contractual term of the awards, and estimated forfeitures. Due to the Company’s limited experience with the expected term of options, the simplified method was utilized in determining the expected option term as prescribed in ASC 718 Compensation – Stock Compensation.

The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period, which is generally consistent with the vesting of the awards, based on the estimated fair value of all stock-based payments issued to employees and directors that are expected to vest.

Warrants

In conjunction with the Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”), the Company issued 17,355,700 warrants to the senior note holders. The warrants entitle the holder to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to $.78 per share at any time on or after October 13, 2021 (the “Initial Exercise Date”) and on or prior to the close of business on October 13, 2026 the “Termination Date”). The Company determined that these warrants are free standing financial instruments that are legally detachable and separately exercisable from the manufacturer. Costs associateddebt instruments. Management also determined that the warrants are puttable for cash upon a fundamental transaction at the option of the holder and as such required classification as equity pursuant to ASC 470. In accordance with the accounting guidance, the outstanding warrants are recognized as equity on the balance sheet. The proceeds from the sale of a debt instrument with stock purchase warrants (detachable call options) shall be allocated to the shipmentstwo elements based on the relative fair values of the debt instrument without the warrants, and of the warrants themselves at time of issuance. The allocation of the portion of the value resulted in a discount of the debt instrument. The fair value of the warrants were measured using the Black Scholes option pricing model.

Foreign Currency

The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiary, MusclePharm Canada, is the Canadian dollar. There are recordedno assets or liabilities in costthis foreign subsidiary and therefore, there is no accumulated other comprehensive income recorded. Revenue and expenses are translated at average exchange rates in effect during the year. Equity transactions are translated using historical exchange rates.

Foreign currency gains and losses resulting from transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in “Interest income, net” in the consolidated statements of sales. For Canadian sales,operations.

F-15

Segments

Historically, the productCompany’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. As such, the Company has had two reporting segments and operating unit structures. During the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company introduced a functional energy beverages line under the MusclePharm and FitMiss brands, so the CODM now reviews financial information and makes resource and opportunity decisions on a disaggregated basis with the functional energy drink business separate from protein products.

Litigation Estimates and Accruals

In the normal course of business or otherwise, the Company may become involved in legal proceedings. The Company will accrue a liability for such matters when it is shipped from our Canadian warehouse to our customersprobable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When only a range of possible loss can be established, the most probable amount in the range is accrued. If no amount within this range is a better estimate than any other amount within the range, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. The accrual for a litigation loss contingency might include, for example, estimates of potential damages, outside legal fees and other directly related costs associated with the shipments are recorded as shipping in cost of sales.

Advertising

expected to be incurred. The Company expenses advertising costsprovides disclosures for material contingencies when there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may be incurred. In assessing whether a loss is a reasonable possibility, the Company may consider the following factors, among others: the nature of the litigation, claim or assessment, available information, opinions or views of legal counsel and other advisors, and the experience gained from similar cases.

Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, are as follows:

  Year Ended December 31, 
  2012  2011 
         
Advertising $8,430,401  $5,241,585 

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Income tax expense includes the current tax liability from operations and the change in deferred income taxes during the year. Interest income, interest expense and penalties associated with income taxes are reflected in (Benefit) provision for income taxes on the consolidated statements of operations. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Beginning

A valuation allowance is required to be established unless management determines that it is more likely than not that the Company will ultimately realize the tax benefit associated with the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes , (included in FASB ASC Subtopic 740-10,Income Taxes — Overall) , thea deferred tax asset.The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not to be sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely to be realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”), which requires the measurement of all expected credit losses of financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. ASU 2016-13 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2022, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company records interestis currently evaluating the impact this ASU may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (“ASU 2020-04”). The amendments in this ASU apply only to contracts, hedging relationships, and penaltiesother transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate that is expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The amendments in this update provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The expedients and exceptions provided by the amendments do not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022, except for hedging relationships existing as of December 31, 2022, that an entity has elected certain optional expedients for and that are retained through the end of the hedging relationship. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020, through December 31, 2022. The Company has not modified any material contracts due to reference rate reform. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements for all future transactions affected by reference rate reform during the time permitted.

F-16

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40). The ASU eliminates the beneficial conversion and cash conversion accounting models for convertible instruments. It also amends the accounting for certain contracts in an entity’s own equity that are currently accounted for as derivatives because of specific settlement provisions. In addition, the new guidance modifies how particular convertible instruments and certain contracts that may be settled in cash or shares impact the diluted EPS computation. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, but not earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The FASB also specified that an entity should adopt the guidance as of the beginning of its annual fiscal year and is not permitted to adopt the guidance in an interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this ASU may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-04, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40). The ASU addresses issuer’s accounting for certain modifications or exchanges of freestanding equity-classified written call options. This amendment is effective for all entities, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is does not believe adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which was expected to reduce cost and complexity related to unrecognizedthe accounting for income taxes. This ASU removes specific exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 in U.S. GAAP. It eliminates the need for an organization to analyze whether the following apply in a given period: exception to the incremental approach for intra-period tax benefitsallocation; exceptions to accounting for basis differences when there are ownership changes in foreign investments; and exception in interim period income tax expense. Thereaccounting for year-to-date losses that exceed anticipated losses. The ASU also simplifies U.S. GAAP for: franchise taxes that are partially based on income; transactions with a government that result in a step up in the tax basis of goodwill; separate financial statements of legal entities that are not subject to tax; and enacted changes in tax laws in interim periods. The Company adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2021, with certain provisions applied retrospectively and other provisions applied prospectively. Adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, statements of operations, or cash flows.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statement presentation, including classification of certain operating expenses.

F-17

Note 3. Inventory

The components of inventory as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 were no interest or penaltiesas follows (in thousands):

Schedule of Inventory

  2021  2020 
  As of December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Raw Materials $694  $437 
Finished Goods  1,144   700 
Inventory  1,838   1,137 
Less: inventory write downs  (8)  (105)
Inventory $1,830  $1,032 

Note 4. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):

Schedule of Property and Equipment

  2021  2020 
  As of December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Furniture, fixtures and Equipment $72  $167 
Vehicles     39 
Property and equipment, gross  72   206 
Less: accumulated depreciation  (67)  (193)
Property and equipment, net $5  $13 

Depreciation expense related to property and equipment was $0.01 million and $0.145 million for the years ended December 31, 20122021 and 2011.2020, respectively, which is included in “Selling and Promotion” expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Beneficial Conversion FeatureNote 5. Intangible Assets

For conventional convertible debt where the rate of conversion is below market value, the Company records a “beneficial conversion feature” (“BCF”) and related debt discount.

When the Company records a BCF, the relative fair valueIntangible assets consisted of the BCF is recorded as a debt discount against the face amountfollowing (in thousands):

Schedule of the respective debt instrument. The discount is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt.Intangible Assets

  As of December 31, 2021 
  Gross Value  Accumulated Amortization  Net Carrying Value  Remaining Weighted Average Useful Lives (years) 
Amortized Intangible Assets                
Brand (apparel rights) $2,244  $(2,209) $35   0.1 
Total $2,244  $(2,209) $35     

  As of December 31, 2020 
  Gross Value  Accumulated Amortization  Net Carrying Value  Remaining Weighted Average Useful Lives (years) 
Amortized Intangible Assets                
Brand (apparel rights) $2,244  $(1,888) $356   1.1 
Total $2,244  $(1,888) $356     

F-12F-18

 

MusclePharm Corporation

Intangible asset amortization expense was $0.3 million and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

Significant Customers

In the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company has relied on two customers for a substantial portion of its sales making up 45% and 55% of total sales, respectively. MusclePharm’s sales$0.3 million for the years ended December 31, 20122021 and 20112020, respectively which is included in “general and administrative” expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2021, the estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets is as follows (in thousands):

Schedule of Estimated Future Amortization Expense of Intangible Assets

For the Year Ending December 31, Amount 
2022 $35 
Total amortization expense $35 

Note 6. Accrued and Other Liabilities

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company’s accrued and other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

Schedule of Accrued and Other Liabilities

  2021  2020 
  As of December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Accrued professional fees $236  $242 
Accrued interest  797   644 
Accrued payroll and bonus  695   738 
Settlements — short term (Nutrablend and 4Excelsior)  2,104   2,005 
Accrued expenses — ThermoLife  1,364   1,364 
Accrued and other short-term liabilities  746   1,201 
Total Accrued and other liabilities $5,942  $6,194 

Note 7. Leases

The Company determines if a contract contains a lease when the contract conveys the right to Bodybuiding.com were 33%control the use of identified property or equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration. Upon identification and 41%, respectivelycommencement of a lease, we establish a right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and a lease liability. ROU assets and lease liabilities are measured and recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. The Company has elected not to GNC 2012apply ASC 842 to arrangements with lease terms of 12 months or less.

The Company has had operating leases for warehouse facilities and 2011 were 12%office space across the United States. The remaining lease terms for these leases range from less than one to 2 years. The Company also leased manufacturing and 14%, respectively.warehouse equipment under finance lease arrangements, which expired at various dates through July 2020. The Company did not extend any leases that expired in 2020.

Accounts payableOn July 24, 2020, the Company entered into a Sublease Agreement with a third-party cosmetics company to sublease the office building in Burbank, California. The sublease commenced on September 15, 2020 and accrued liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consistsis in effect through the remainder of the Company’s Trade Payableslease term (September 15, 2020 through September 30, 2022). Rent was abated for the sublease tenant between November 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020.

In September 2020, the Company assessed its existing leases for impairment as the remaining lease costs exceeded the anticipated sublease income on these leases. As a result of the impairment analysis, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $0.167 million. No impairment was determined to exist in 2021.

The Company has elected the practical expedient to combine lease and non-lease components into a single component for all of its leases. Fixed lease costs represent the explicitly quantified lease payments prescribed by the lease agreement and are included in the measurement of the ROU asset and corresponding lease liability.

F-19

Some leasing arrangements require variable payments that are dependent on usage, output, or may vary for other reasons, such as insurance and tax payments. The variable lease payments are not presented as part of the initial ROU asset or lease liability. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material restrictive covenants.

The components of lease cost for operating and finance leases for the year ended December 31, 2021 were as follows (in thousands):

Schedule of Components of Lease Cost for Operating and Finance Leases

  Income Statement Classification Year Ended December 31, 2021  Year Ended December 31, 2020 
Operating lease cost General and administrative $371  $718 
Finance lease cost:          
Amortization of right of use asset General and administrative  -   61 
Interest on lease liabilities General and administrative  -   1 
Total finance lease cost    -   62 
           
Variable lease payments General and administrative  481   318 
Sublease income Interest income expense, net  (401)  (315)
Total lease cost   $451  $783 

The Company had no short-term leases as of December 31, 2021. The Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate; therefore, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the effective date in determining the present value of future payments for those leases.

The weighted average discount rate was as follows:

Schedule of Weighted Average Discount Rate

  2021  2020 
Operating leases  18%  18%
Finance leases  0%  5%

The maturities of lease liabilities with leases in effect as of December 31, 2021 were as follows (in thousands):

Schedule of Maturities of Lease liabilities

  Operating Lease 
2022 $342 
Thereafter  - 
Total future undiscounted lease payments  368 
Less amounts representing interest  26 
Present value of lease liabilities $342 

F-20

Note 8. Interest Expense

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, interest expense consisted of the following:

Schedule of Interest Expenses

       
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Interest expense, related party $(541) $(329)
Interest expense, other  (1,042)  202 
Interest expense, secured borrowing arrangement  (1,083)  (1,366)
Amortization of Debt Issue Cost associated with related warrants  (2,296)  - 
Amortization of Debt Issue Cost - OID  (498)  - 
Total interest expense $(5,460) $(1,493)

Note 9. Other Income, Net

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, “Other income, net” consisted of the following:

Schedule of Other Income Net

       
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Other income - loan forgiveness $965 $- 
Foreign currency transaction loss  (28)  (8)
Other  564  473 
Total other income, net $1,501 $465 

Note 10 . Debt

As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company’s debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

Schedule of Debt

       
  As of December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Senior notes payable $5,035  $ 
Refinanced convertible note, related party  5,330   2,872 
Revolving line of credit, related party     743 
Obligations under secured borrowing arrangement  6,446   7,098 
Notes Payable  210   167 
Debt issue costs, net  (479)   - 
Paycheck Protection Program Loan     965 
Total Debt $17,021  $11,845 
Less: current portion  (17,021)  (10,881)
Long term debt $-  $964 

Senior Notes Payable

On October 13, 2021, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain institutional investors as purchasers (the “Investors”). Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company sold, and the Investors purchased, $8,197,674 million (the “Purchase Price”) in principal amount of senior notes (the “Senior Notes”) and warrants (the “Warrants”).

The Senior Notes were issued with an original issue discount of 14%, bear no interest and mature after 6 months, on April 13, 2022. To secure its obligations thereunder and under the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company has granted a security interest over substantially all of its assets to the collateral agent for the benefit of the Investors, pursuant to a pledge and security agreement.

The maturity date of the Senior Notes may be extended to May 28, 2022 if no event of default has occurred and is continuing and cash flows from operating and investing activities (but not cash flows from financing activities) of the Company and its subsidiaries was positive for March 2022 and no event of default is reasonably expected to occur on or before April 30, 2022 and the sum of cash flows from operating and investing activities (but not from financing activities) of the Company and its subsidiaries will be positive for April 2022. The maturity date of the Senior Notes also may be extended under other circumstances specified therein. If the maturity date is extended, interest will accrue on and from April 13, 2022 at 18% per annum until the Senior Notes are paid in full. The Company is undertaking various initiatives to improve gross margins to become cash flow positive prior to the maturity of the Senior Notes. These initiatives include improving cost of goods on certain raw materials., there can be no assurance the Company will be able to successfully implement such initiatives on a timely basis or at all or that it otherwise will meet the conditions required to extend the Senior Notes. If the Company is unable to extend the Senior Notes or elects not to do so, the Company will be required to repay the Senior Notes through equity issuances, additional borrowings, cash flows from operations and/or other sources of liquidity. For additional information, please refer to “Note 19 – Subsequent Events.”

F-21

The Warrants are exercisable for five (5) years to purchase 17,355,700 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at an exercise price of $0.78, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances described in the Warrants. The Warrants have a face value of $4.4 million which is recorded in Additional Paid-In Capital.

In conjunction with the private placement of Senior Notes and Warrants, each of the directors and officers of the Company entered into lock-up agreements, which prohibit sales of the Common Stock until after April 11, 2022, subject to certain exceptions.

The issuance of the Senior Notes and Warrants was made in reliance on the exemption provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), for the offer and sale of securities not involving a public offering, and Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act. In accordance with ASC 470-20-25-2, proceeds from the sale of a debt instrument with stock purchase warrants (detachable call options) are allocated to the two elements based on the relative fair values of the debt instrument without the warrants and of the warrants themselves at time of issuance. The portion of the proceeds so allocated to the warrants shall be accounted for as additional paid-in capital. The remainder of the proceeds shall be allocated to the debt instrument portion of the transaction.

November 2020 Convertible Note, Related Party

On November 29, 2020, the Company entered into a refinancing agreement with Mr. Ryan Drexler, (the “November 2020 Refinancing”), in which the Company issued to Mr. Drexler a convertible secured promissory note (the November 2020 “Convertible Note”) in the original principal amount of $2.9 million, which amended and restated a convertible secured promissory note dated as of August 21, 2020. The $2.9 million November 2020 Convertible Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum. Unless earlier converted or repaid, all outstanding principal and any accrued but unpaid interest under the November 2020 Convertible Note shall be due and payable on July 1, 2021. Any interest not paid when due shall be capitalized and added to the principal amount of the November 2020 Convertible Note and bear interest on the applicable interest payment date along with all other unpaid principal, capitalized interest, and other capitalized obligations.

Mr. Drexler may, at any time, and from time to time, upon written notice to the Company, convert the outstanding principal and accrued interest into shares of Common Stock, at a conversion price of $0.23 per share. At the election of the Company, one-sixth of the interest may be paid in kind (“PIK Interest”) by adding such amount to the principal amount of the note, or through the issuance of shares of the Company’s common stock to Mr. Drexler. The PIK Interest is convertible to common stock at the closing price per share on the last business day of each calendar quarter. In no event will the conversion price of such PIK Interest be less than $0.10. The Company may prepay the Note by giving Mr. Drexler between 15-days’ and 60-days’ notice depending upon the specific circumstances, subject to Mr. Drexler’s conversion right.

The November 2020 Convertible Note contains customary restrictions on the ability of the Company to, among other things, grant liens or incur indebtedness other than certain obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business. The restrictions are also subject to certain additional qualifications and carveouts, as set forth in the November 2020 Convertible Note. The November 2020 Convertible Note is subordinated to certain other indebtedness of the Company held by Prestige Capital Corporation (“Prestige”) and the Senior Notes.

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, interest expense related to the related party convertible secured promissory notes was $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, interest paid in cash to Mr. Drexler was $0.466 million and $0.031 million respectively.

F-22

Revolving Line of Credit, Related Party

On October 15, 2020, the Company entered into a secured revolving promissory note (the “Revolving Note”) with Mr. Ryan Drexler. Under the terms of the Revolving Note, the Company can borrow up to $3.0 million. The Revolving Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum. The funds were used for the purchase of whey protein and other general corporate purposes. Both the outstanding principal, if any, and all accrued interest under the Revolving Note were due on March 31, 2021, which was not paid.

On August 13, 2021, the Company issued to Ryan Drexler (the “Holder”) a convertible secured promissory note (the “August 2021 Convertible Note”) in the original principal amount of $2.5 million, replacing the Revolving Note.

The August 2021 Convertible Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum. Interest payments are due on the last day of each calendar quarter. At the Company’s option (as determined by its independent directors), the Company may repay up to one sixth of any interest payment by either adding such amount to the principal amount of the August 2021 Convertible Note or by converting such interest amount into an equivalent amount of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”). Any interest not paid when due shall be capitalized and added to the principal amount of the August 2021 Convertible Note and bear interest on the applicable interest payment date along with all other unpaid principal, capitalized interest, and other capitalized obligations. Both the principal and any accrued but unpaid interest under the August 2021 Convertible Note will be due on July 14, 2022, unless converted or repaid earlier.

The Holder may, at any time, and from time to time, upon written notice to the Company, convert the outstanding principal and accrued interest into shares of Common Stock, at a conversion price equal to the closing price of the common stock on October 15, 2021. The Company may prepay the August 2021 Convertible Note by giving the Holder between 15 and 60 days’ notice depending upon the specific circumstances, subject to the Holder’s conversion right.

The August 2021 Convertible Note contains customary events of default, including, among others, the failure by the Company to make a payment of principal or interest when due. Following an event of default, at the option of the Holder and upon written notice to the Company, or automatically under certain circumstances, all outstanding principal and accrued interest will become due and payable. The August 2021 Convertible Note also contains customary restrictions on the ability of the Company to, among other things, grant liens or incur indebtedness other than certain obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business. The restrictions are also subject to certain additional qualifications and carveouts, as set forth in the August 2021 Convertible Note. The August 2021 Convertible Note is subordinated to certain other indebtedness of the Company held by Prestige Corporation (“Prestige”) and the Senior Notes.

The related party revolving line of credit balance of December 31, 2021 was 0 and December 31, 2020 was $0.7 million.

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, total related party debt was $5.3 million and $6.9 million, respectively.

Obligations Under Secured Borrowing Arrangement

In January 2016, the Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Purchase and Sale Agreement”) with Prestige, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell and assign, and Prestige agreed to buy and accept, certain accounts receivable owed to the Company (“Accounts”). Under the terms of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, upon the receipt and acceptance of each assignment of Accounts, Prestige will pay the Company 80% of the net face amount of the assigned Accounts, up to a maximum total borrowing of $12.5 million subject to sufficient amounts of accounts receivable to secure the loan. The remaining 20% will be paid to the Company upon collection of the assigned Accounts, less any chargebacks (including chargebacks for any customer amounts that remain outstanding for over 90 days), disputes, or other amounts due to Prestige. Prestige’s purchase of the assigned Accounts from the Company will be at a discount fee which varies from 0.7% to 4%, based on the number of days outstanding from the assignment of Accounts to collection of the assigned Accounts. In addition, the Company granted Prestige a continuing security interest in and first priority lien upon all accounts receivable, inventory, fixed assets, general intangibles, and other assets. Prestige will have no recourse against the Company if payments are not made due to the insolvency of an account debtor within 90 days of invoice date, with the exception of international and certain domestic customers. On April 10, 2019, the Company and Prestige amended the terms of the agreement. The agreement was extended until April 1, 2020 and automatically renews for one (1) year periods unless either party receives written notice of cancellation from the other, at minimum, thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date thereafter.

F-23

On June 14, 2021, Prestige advanced the Company $1.0 million with a six-month term, 15% interest rate and 2% accommodation fee.

On July 26, 2021, Prestige advanced the Company $1.0 million with a six-month term and a 15% interest rate. In addition, there was an accommodation fee equal to 1% of the amount advanced plus 18,750 stock options.

On October 12, 2021, the June 14, 2021 and July 26, 2021 the total Prestige advance $2.0 million was extended to the date of the termination of the senior secured note offering, which is in April 2022, and may be extended as discussed above.

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company assigned Prestige accounts with an aggregate face amount of approximately $49.7 million and $58.0 million, respectively, for which Prestige paid to the Company approximately $49.1 million and $46.4 million, respectively, in cash. During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, $49.7 million and $43.7 million, respectively, was repaid to Prestige, including fees and interest. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, we had outstanding borrowings of approximately $6.4 and $7.1 million, respectively.

Paycheck Protection Program Loan

Due to economic uncertainty as a result of the ongoing pandemic (“COVID-19”), on May 14, 2020, the Company received an aggregate principal amount of $964,910 pursuant to the borrowing arrangement (“Note”) with Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC (“HSBF”) and agreed to pay the principal amount plus interest at a 1% fixed interest rate per year, on the unpaid principal balance. The Note includes forgiveness provisions in accordance with the requirements of the Paycheck Protection Program, Section 1106 of the CARES Act.

The Note was expected to mature on May 16, 2025. Payments were due by November 16, 2020 (the “Deferment Period”) and interest was accrued during the Deferment Period. However, the Flexibility Act, which was signed into law on June 5, 2020, extended the Deferment Period to the date that the forgiven amount is remitted by the United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”) to HSBF.

On October 25, 2021, the Company received a letter from HSBF indicating the Company’s SBA PPP loan has been forgiven in full by HSBF and was recorded as a $964,910 gain on forgiveness of debt located in other income-loan forgiveness..

Note 11. Warrants

In conjunction with the Securities Purchase Agreement (SPA), the Company issued 17,355,700 warrants to the senior note holders. The warrants entitle the holder to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to $.78 per share at any time on or after October 13, 2021 (the “Initial Exercise Date”) and on or prior to the close of business on October 13, 2026 the “Termination Date”). The Company determined that these warrants are free standing financial instruments that are legally detachable and separately exercisable from the debt instruments. Management also determined that the warrants are puttable for cash upon a fundamental transaction at the option of the holder and as such required classification as equity pursuant to ASC 470. In accordance with the accounting guidance, the outstanding warrants are recognized as equity on the balance sheet. The proceeds from the sale of a debt instrument with stock purchase warrants (detachable call options) shall be allocated to the two elements based on the relative fair values of the debt instrument without the warrants, and of the warrants themselves at time of issuance. The allocation of the portion of the value resulted in a discount of the debt instrument. The fair value of the warrants were measured using the Black Scholes option pricing model.

F-24

The assumptions used to measure the fair value of the warrant as of its issuance date were as follows:

Schedule of Fair Value Measurement Warrant

Inputs   
Warrants Granted  17,355,700 
Stock Price $0.65 
Exercise Price $0.78 
Term, expected life of options in years  30.00 
Volatility  322.8%
Annual Rate of Quarterly Dividends  0.00%
Risk Free Interest Rate  0.515%

Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies

Contingencies

In the normal course of business or otherwise, the Company may become involved in legal proceedings. The Company will accrue a liability for such matters when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When only a range of possible loss can be established, the most probable amount in the range is accrued. If no amount within this range is a better estimate than any other amount within the range, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. The accrual for a litigation loss contingency might include, for example, estimates of potential damages, outside legal fees and other directly related costs expected to be incurred. The Company provides disclosures for material contingencies when there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may be incurred. In assessing whether a loss is a reasonable possibility, the Company may consider the following factors, among others: the nature of the litigation, claim or assessment, available information, opinions or views of legal counsel and other advisors, and the experience gained from similar cases. As of December 31, 2021, the Company was involved in the following material legal proceedings described below:

Settlements

Manchester City Football Group

The Company was engaged in a dispute with City Football Group Limited (“CFG”), the owner of Manchester City Football Group, concerning amounts allegedly owed by the Company under a sponsorship agreement with CFG (the “Sponsorship Agreement”). In August 2016, CFG commenced arbitration in the United Kingdom against the Company, seeking approximately $8.3 million for the Company’s purported breach of the Sponsorship Agreement.

On July 28, 2017, the Company approved a Settlement Agreement (the “CFG Settlement Agreement”) with CFG effective July 7, 2017. The CFG Settlement Agreement represents a full and final settlement of all litigation between the parties. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to pay CFG a sum of $3 million, which was recorded as accrued expenses in 2017. The settlement consists of a $1.0 million payment that was advanced by a related party on July 7, 2017, a $1.0 million installment paid on July 7, 2018 and a subsequent $1.0 million installment payment to paid by July 7, 2019. Of this amount, the Company has remitted $0.3 million.

F-25

During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recorded a charge of $75,000 and $75,000, respectively. This charge, representing imputed interest, is included in “Interest expense” in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

Nutrablend Matter

On February 27, 2020, Nutrablend, a manufacturer of MusclePharm products, filed an action against the Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, claiming approximately $3.1 million in allegedly unpaid invoices. These invoices relate to the third and fourth quarter of 2019, and a liability has been recorded for the related periods.

On September 25, 2020, the parties successfully mediated the case to a settlement (the “Nutrablend Agreement”) and the Company agreed to (i) pay approximately $3.1 million (“Owed Amount”) in monthly payments (“Monthly Payments”) from September 1, 2020 through June 30, 2023 and (ii) issue monthly purchase orders (“Purchase Orders”) at minimum amounts accepted by Nutrablend.

The Company agreed to issue Purchase Orders in a combined total amount of at least (i) $1.5 million from September 1, 2020 through November 30, 2020; (ii) $1.8 million from December 1, 2020 through February 28, 2021; (iii) $2.1 million from March 31, 2021 through May 31, 2021; (iv) $2.1 million from June 1, 2021 through August 31, 2021; and (v) $1.4 million from September 1, 2021 through October 30, 2021. Beginning on November 1, 2021, the Company will be required to issue monthly Purchase Orders to Nutrablend in a minimum amount of $0.7 million until the Owed Amount is paid in full to Nutrablend. In the event that the Company pays the Owed Amount in full before September 1, 2021, it’s entitled to a rebate on all completed Purchase Orders. Further, once the monthly payments, and any additional payments that the Company has made on the Owed Amount, reduce the outstanding balance of the Owed Amount to below $2.0 million, the Company is eligible for an extension of a line of credit from Nutrablend in an amount of up to $3.0 million.

On July 7, 2021, the Company commenced an action against Nutrablend in the Central District of California, seeking (i) a declaration that the Nutrablend Agreement purchase order provisions have been terminated due to Nutrablend’s failure to provide the Company with reasonable assurances of its ability to fulfill its purchase orders; (ii) a declaration that approximately $2.0 million in purchase orders that the Company placed in July and August 2020 were intended to and do count towards the minimums set forth in the Nutrablend Agreement; and (iii) damages based on Nutrablend’s failure to fulfill purchase orders. The case is ongoing.

As of December 31, 2021, the Company determined that approximately $0.991million of the owed amount was due within a year, and this amount was recorded in “Accrued and other liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The present value of the remaining Owed Amount that was due after a year was $0.502 million, and the amount was recorded in “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company made payments of $1.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2021.

On September 23, 2021, the Company entered into an Amendment to a Settlement Agreement that was originally entered into on September 25, 2020. Pursuant to the Amended Agreement, the Company is no longer obligated to issue Purchase Orders to Nutrablend as stated in the Settlement Agreement, which, as stated in the Form 8-K dated September 25, 2020, consisted of at least (i) $1.5 million from September 1, 2020 through November 30, 2020; (ii) $1.8 million from December 1, 2020 through February 28, 2021; (iii) $2.0 million from March 1, 2021 through May 31, 2021; (iv) $2.1 million from June 1, 2021 through August 31, 2021; and (v) $1.4 million from September 1, 2021 through October 30, 2021. The Monthly Payments provision of the Settlement Agreement remains unchanged.

4Excelsior Matter

On March 18, 2019, Excelsior Nutrition, Inc. (“4Excelsior”), a manufacturer of MusclePharm products, filed an action against the Company in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, claiming approximately $6.2 million in damages relating to allegedly unpaid invoices, as well as amounts estimatedapproximately $7.8 million in consequential damages.

F-26

On December 16, 2020, the Company and 4Excelsior entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (“the Agreement”), pursuant to which the parties resolved and settled the civil action pending in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles (the “Litigation”). The parties agreed to a mutual general release of claims and to jointly file within 10 business days of the effective date of the Agreement a stipulation and proposed order of dismissal, dismissing with prejudice all claims and counterclaims asserted in the Litigation. The Company agreed to pay $4.75 million (the “Settlement Amount”) in four monthly payments of $70,000, beginning January 5, 2021, and thereafter in monthly payments of $100,000 until the Settlement Amount is fully paid. The Company may prepay all or any portion of the Settlement Amount at any time without penalty or premium. The Agreement provides that, in the event of a Default (as defined in the Agreement) by management for future liabilitythe Company, the entire outstanding balance of the Settlement Amount will become immediately due and payable, plus accrued interest at a rate of 18% per annum, commencing from the date of default.

The Company determined that approximately $1.1 million of the Settlement Amount was due within a year, and this amount was recorded in “Accrued and other liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The present value of the remaining Settlement Amount that was due after a year was $1.8 million, and the amount was recorded in “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company made payments that relateof $1.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2021.

ThermoLife International

In January 2016, ThermoLife International LLC (“ThermoLife”), a supplier of nitrates to the current accounting period. Management reviews these estimates periodicallyCompany, filed a complaint against the Company in Arizona state court. ThermoLife alleged that the Company failed to determine their reasonablenessmeet minimum purchase requirements contained in the parties’ supply agreement. The court held a bench trial on the issue of damages in October 2019, and fair presentation.

Debt

on December 4, 2019, the court entered judgment in favor of ThermoLife and against the Company in the amount of $1.6 million, comprised of $0.9 million in damages, interest in the amount of $0.3 million and attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $0.4 million. The Company definesrecorded $1.6 million in accrued expenses in 2018. The Company has filed an appeal and posted bonds in the total amount of $0.6 million in order to stay execution on the judgment pending appeal. Of the $0.6 million, $0.25 million (including fees) was paid by Mr. Drexler on behalf of the Company. See “Note 8. Debt” for additional information. The balance of $0.35 million was secured by a personal guaranty from Mr. Drexler, while the associated annual fee of $12,500 has been paid by the Company. On April 27, 2021, the appellate court issued a decision largely affirming the trial court judgement, except vacating the judgement’s $0.3 million prejudgment interest award and remanding for a recalculation of prejudgment interest. On May 18, 2021, ThermoLife filed a motion asking the trial court to increase the Company’s appeal bond to the full amount of the judgment, or $1.9 million, which the Court denied on June 2, 2021.

As of December 31, 2021, the total amount accrued, including interest, was $1.9 million. In the interim, the Company filed an appeal and posted bonds in the total amount of $0.6 million in order to stay execution on the judgment pending appeal. Of the $0.6 million, $0.25 million (including fees) was paid by Mr. Drexler on behalf of the Company. See Note 8 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information. The balance of $0.35 million was secured by a personal guaranty from Mr. Drexler, while the associated fees of $12,500 were paid by the Company. The appeal has been fully briefed and is awaiting a decision.

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, interest expense recognized on the awarded damages was $96,815 and $89,000, respectfully. As of December 31, 2021, the Company owed $1.4 million related to this settlement that is reflected in accrued and other liabilities.

The Company intends to continue to vigorously pursue its defenses on appeal with the Arizona Supreme Court.

F-27

White Winston Select Asset Fund Series MP-18, LLC et al., v MusclePharm Corp., et al., (Nev. Dist. Ct.; Cal. Superior Court; Colorado Dist. Ct.; Mass. Super. Ct.)

On August 21, 2018, White Winston Select Asset Fund Series MP-18, LLC and White Winston Select Asset Fund, LLC (together “White Winston”) initiated a derivative action against the Company and its directors (the “director defendants”). White Winston alleges that the director defendants breached their fiduciary duties by improperly approving the refinancing of three promissory notes issued by the Company to Mr. Drexler (the “Amended Note”) in exchange for $18.0 million in loans. White Winston alleges that this refinancing improperly diluted their economic and voting power and constituted an improper distribution in violation of Nevada law. In its complaint, White Winston sought the appointment of a receiver over the Company, a permanent injunction against the exercise of Mr. Drexler’s conversion right under the Amended Note, and other unspecified monetary damages. On September 13, 2018, White Winston filed an amended complaint, which added a former executive of the Company, as a plaintiff (together with White Winston, the “White Winston Plaintiffs”). On December 9, 2019, the White Winston Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint, in which they added allegations relating to the resignation of the Company’s auditor, Plante & Moran PLLC (“Plante Moran”). the Company has moved to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. That motion has not yet been fully briefed.

Along with its complaint, White Winston also filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and preliminary injunction enjoining the exercise of Mr. Drexler’s conversion right under the Amended Note. On August 23, 2018, the Nevada district court issued an ex parte TRO. On September 14, 2018, the court let the TRO expire and denied White Winston’s request for a preliminary injunction, finding, among other things, that White Winston did not show a likelihood of success on the merits of the underlying action and failed to establish irreparable harm. Following the court’s decision, the Company filed a motion seeking to recoup the legal fees and costs it incurred in responding to the preliminary injunction motion. On October 31, 2019, the court awarded the Company $56,000 in fees and costs.

Due to the uncertainty associated with determining our liability, if any, and due to our inability to ascertain with any reasonable degree of likelihood, as of the date of this report, the outcome of the trial, the Company has not recorded an estimate for its potential liability.

On June 17, 2019, White Winston moved for the appointment of a temporary receiver over the Company, citing Plante Moran’s resignation. The court granted White Winston’s request to hold an evidentiary hearing on the motion, but subsequently stayed the action pending the parties’ attempts to resolve their dispute. Although the parties have been unable to reach a resolution, the litigation has not yet resumed. On July 30, 2019, White Winston filed an action in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles, seeking access to the Company’s books and records and requesting the appointment of an independent auditor for the Company. On February 25, 2021, the court ordered the Company to produce certain documents, denied White Winston’s request for an auditor, and ordered the Company to pay a $1,500 penalty. On July 20, 2021 the California court awarded White Winston $93,000 in attorneys’ fees and cost relating to the books-and-records action. The Company paid the amounts due on July 30, 2021, and on August 4, 2021 White Winston submitted a filing acknowledging that the California court’s judgment has been fully satisfied.

On April 6, 2016, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) selected our 2014 Federal Income Tax Return for audit. As a result of the audit, the IRS proposed certain adjustments with respect to the tax reporting of our former executives’ 2014 restricted stock grants. Due to the Company’s current and historical loss position, the proposed adjustments would have no material impact on the Company’s Federal income tax. On October 5, 2016, the IRS commenced an audit of our employment and withholding tax liability for 2014. The IRS contended that the Company inaccurately reported the value of the restricted stock grants and improperly failed to provide for employment taxes and Federal tax withholding on these grants. In addition, the IRS proposed certain penalties associated with the Company’s filings. On April 4, 2017, the Company received a “30-day letter” from the IRS asserting back taxes and penalties of approximately $5.3 million, of which $4.4 million related to withholding taxes, specifically, income withholding and Social Security taxes, and $0.9 million related to penalties. Additionally, the IRS asserted that the Company owes information reporting penalties of approximately $2.0 million.

The Company’s counsel submitted a formal protest to the IRS disputing on several grounds all of the proposed adjustments and penalties on the Company’s behalf, and the Company pursued this matter vigorously through the IRS appeal process. An Appeals Conference was held with the IRS in Denver, Colorado on July 31, 2019. At the conference, the Company made substantial arguments challenging the IRS’s claims for employment taxes and penalties. On December 16, 2019, a further Appeals Conference was held with the IRS by telephone. At the telephone conference, the Appeals Officer confirmed that he agreed with the Company’s argument that the failure to deposit penalties should be conceded by the IRS. The failure to deposit penalties total about $2 million. Thus, with this concession, the IRS’s claims have been reduced from approximately $7.3 million to about $5.3 million.

F-28

The remaining issue involved the fair market value of restricted stock units the Company granted to certain former officers (the “Former Officers”) of the Company under Internal Revenue Code § 83. The Company and the IRS disagreed as to the value of the restricted stock on the date of the grants, i.e., October 1, 2014. The Company and the IRS exchanged expert valuation reports on the fair market value of the stock and had extensive negotiations on this issue. The IRS also made parallel claims regarding the restricted stock units against the Former Officers of the Company. The IRS asserted that the Former Officers received ordinary income from the stock grants, and that they owe additional personal income taxes based on the fair market value of the stock. The Former Officers’ cases, unlike the Company’s case, are pending before the United States Tax Court. In the Tax Court litigation, the Former Officers are challenging the IRS’s determinations regarding the fair market value of the restricted stock grants on October 1, 2014. The Former Officers have separate counsel from the Company. The same IRS Appeals Officer and Revenue Agents assigned to the Company’s case are also involved in the cases for the Former Officers. Throughout the proceedings, the Company has argued to the IRS that it is the Former Officers who are directly and principally liable for the amount of any tax due, and not the Company.

The Former Officers cases were scheduled for trial in Tax Court on March 9, 2020. The trial of the cases was continued by the Court on February 4, 2020. The basis for the continuance was that the IRS and the Former Officers had made progress toward a settlement of the valuation issue involving the grants of the restricted stock. The Tax Court ordered the Former Officers to file status reports regarding progress of their settlement negotiations with the IRS on or before February 28, 2021. The IRS and the Former Officers filed status reports with the Tax Court on February 26, 2021. After receiving the status reports, the Tax Court issued an order directing the parties to file further status reports on or before July 9, 2021. The Tax Court has not set a trial dates in the cases of the Former Officers.

On June 29, 2021, an IRS Appeals Officer confirmed that the tax matter had exceeded the applicable statute of limitations and was deemed closed from any further assessment by the IRS.

On August 22, 2018, Richard Estalella filed an action against us and two other defendants in the Colorado District Court for the County of Denver, seeking damages arising out of the IRS’s assertion of tax liability and penalties relating to the 2014 restricted stock grants. We have answered Estalella’s complaint, asserted counterclaims against Estalella for his failure to ensure that all withholding taxes were paid in connection with the 2014 restricted stock grants, and filed cross-claims against two valuation firms named in the action (as well as their principals) for failing to properly value the 2014 restricted stock grants for tax purposes. The trial was scheduled for February 7, 2022 but was ultimately settled in mediation. There are no amounts accrued related to this matter.

The Company engaged in mediation with all parties to Estalella’s lawsuit on November 2, 2021. Following mediation, on November 3, 2021, the Company approved a global settlement with the parties to Mr. Estalella’s lawsuit. The parties are currently in the process of negotiating, finalizing, and executing the settlement agreement. This settlement agreement, upon finalization by the parties and dismissal of the litigation by the Court, will constitute a full and final settlement of Mr. Estalella’s claims against all parties to the litigation, including the Company, as well as of the Company’s claims against the two valuation firms.

This matter is now closed.

The table below summarizes accrued expenses and interest expense incurred in 2021 and 2020 (in thousands):

Schedule of Accrued Expenses and Interest Expense

Cases 2021 Accrued  2020 Accrued  2021 Interest Expense  2020 Interest Expense 
Manchester City Football Group (1) $730  $730  $(75) $(75)
Nutrablend Matter (3)  1,493   2,318   (267)  (66)
4Excelsior Matter (3)  2,938   3,597   (421)  (16)
ThermoLife International (2)  1,364   1,364   (97)  (89)
Total $6,525  $8,009  $(860) $(246)

(1)Accrued amount on balance sheet is located in accounts payable.
(2)Accrued amount on balance sheet is located in accrued expenses.
(3)Accrued amount on balance sheet takes into account short term and long term liability accounts.

F-29

Note 13. Stockholders’ Deficit

Common Stock

The Company had the following issuances of common stock during the year ended December 31, 2021 (in thousands, except share and per share data):

Schedule of Common Stock

Transaction Type Quantity (Shares)  Valuation  Range of Value
per Share
 
Stock-based compensation for issuance and amortization of restricted stock awards to employees, executives, and directors  280,916  $609   $.40 to $1.60 
Total  280,916  $609   $.40 to $1.60 

Treasury Stock

During the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock and held 875,621shares in treasury as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.

Note 14. Stock-Based Compensation

The Company’s stock-based compensation for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 consisted primarily of stock options and restricted stock awards.

Stock Incentive Plans

2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan

On December 22, 2021, the Board of Directors adopted the 2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”) and the issuance of an option to purchase 1,811,000 shares of common stock of the Company, exercisable at a price of $0.40, to Sabina Rizvi, the President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to the 2021 Plan. The option vested 50% upon issuance and the remaining (50%) in five (5) equal monthly installments commencing on December 4, 2021 and becoming fully vested on April 4, 2022. Ms. Rizvi’s acceptance of the option and the option granted thereunder waived any right to receive a two percent (2%) transaction bonus upon a sale of the Company pursuant to that certain offer letter by and between the Company and Ms. Rizvi dated April 1, 2021.

2015 Incentive Compensation Plan

In 2015, the Board adopted the MusclePharm Corporation 2015 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2015 Plan”). The 2015 Plan provides for the issuance of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, dividend equivalent rights, and other cash- and stock-based awards to employees, consultants and directors of the Company or its subsidiaries.

The 2015 Plan is administered by the Board, unless the Board elects to delegate administration responsibilities to a committee (either of the foregoing, or their authorized delegates, the “plan administrator”), and will continue in effect until terminated. The 2015 Plan may be amended, modified or terminated, subject to stockholder approval to the extent necessary to comply with applicable law or to the extent an amendment increases the number of shares available under the 2015 Plan or permits the extension of the exercise period for an stock option or stock appreciation right beyond ten years from the date of grant, and, with respect to outstanding awards, subject to the consent of the holder thereof if the amendment, modification or termination materially and adversely affects such holder. The total number of shares that may be issued under the 2015 Plan cannot exceed 2,000,000, subject to adjustment in the event of certain changes in the capital structure of the Company. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, there were 576,494 shares and 576,494 remaining shares available for issuance under the 2015 Plan.

F-30

The plan administrator determines the individuals who are issued awards and the terms and conditions of the awards, including vesting terms and conditions. The plan administrator also determines the methods by which the exercise price of stock options may be paid, which may include a combination of cash or check, shares, a promissory note or other property, and the methods by which shares are delivered.

Under the 2015 Plan, in any calendar year, the maximum number of shares with respect to which awards may be granted to any one participant during the year is 350,000 shares, subject to adjustment in the event of specified changes in the capital structure of the Company, and the maximum amount that may be paid in cash during any calendar year with respect to any award is $1.5 million.

Restricted Stock

The restricted stock awards granted to employees, executives and board members during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were as follows (in thousands):

Schedule of Restricted Stock Awards Granted to Employees, Executives and Board Members

  Unvested Restricted Stock Awards 
  Number of Shares  Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value 
Unvested balance - December 31, 2019  (690,132) $1.05 
Granted  -  $- 
Vested  568,280  $0.42 
Forfeited  (121,852) $0.42 
Unvested balance - December 31, 2020  -  $- 
Granted  50,000  $1.08 
Vested  -  $- 
Forfeited  (50,000) $1.08 
Unvested balance - December 31, 2021  -  $- 

There were 50,000 restricted stock awards granted and subsequently forfeited during the year ended December 31, 2021. There were 0 restricted stock awards granted for the year ended December 31, 2020.

As of December 31, 2021, there was 0 unrecognized expense for unvested restricted stock awards.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company had the following transactions related to its common stock including restricted stock awards (in thousands, except share and per share data):

Schedule of Restricted Stock Awards Activity

Transaction Type Quantity (Shares)  Valuation  Range of Value
per Share
 
Stock issued for advertising services  226,722  $204  $0.90 
Restricted stock forfeited by directors  (121,850)  (51)  0.42 
Total  104,872  $153   $ 0.42 to $0.90 

Stock Options

The Company may grant options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock to certain employees and directors pursuant to the 2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan or the 2015 Plan. Under both plans, all stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair market value of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. No stock option may be exercisable more than ten years after the date it is granted.

F-31

On May 12, 2021, the Company entered into an Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Joseph Cannata (“Cannata”), pursuant to which the Company has engaged Cannata on a non-exclusive basis to assist with the growth of the Company’s energy beverage product line. In connection with entry into the Agreement, the Company issued to Cannata an option to purchase 1,673,994 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price per share of $1.12. These options will vest in two equal tranches upon the achievement of certain net revenue milestones related to the Company’s energy beverage products. The estimated fair value of this grant is $1.11 and was determined by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with an average term debt as any debt payment due less than one yearof 7.5 years; annual volatility rate of 205%; discount rate of 1.34%; and 0% for dividend rate. The fair value of option is recognized over the requisite vesting period which is deemed to be equal to the term of the security.

On July 26, 2021, the Company entered into a Modification Agreement (the “Modification”) with Prestige Capital Finance, LLC (“Prestige”), providing a second over-advance from the purchase and sale agreement dated January 2016. The over-advance provided $2 million of funding to the Company, to be repaid within the earlier of six months from the date of the financial statements. Long term debt is defined as any debt payment due more than one year fromagreement, or when the dateCompany arranges additional funding. In connection with the Modification, the Company granted options to Prestige to purchase 18,750 shares of the financial statements. Refer to Note 4 for further disclosure debt liabilities.Company’s common stock.

Derivative Liabilities

Fair value accounting requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments such as conversion features in convertible debt or equity instruments, and measurement of their fair value. In determining the appropriate fair value,On August 12, 2021, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. In assessing the convertible debt instruments, management determines if the convertible debt host instrument is conventional convertible debt and further if there is a beneficial conversion feature requiring measurement. If the instrument is not considered conventional convertible debt,entered into an Agreement (the “Agreement”) with T.J. Dillashaw (“Dillashaw”), pursuant to which the Company continues its evaluation processhas engaged Dillashaw on a non-exclusive basis to promote the Company’s energy beverage product line. In connection with entry into the Agreement, the Company issued to Dillashaw an option to purchase 50,000 shares of these instruments as derivative financial instruments.

Once derivative liabilities are determined, they are adjusted to reflect fair value at the end of each reporting period. Any increase or decrease in the fair value is recorded in results of operations as an adjustment toCompany’s common stock. The estimated fair value of derivatives. In addition,this grant is $78,000 and was determined by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with a one year term; annual volatility rate of 206%; discount rate of 1.34%; and 0% for dividend rate. The fair value of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants, are also valuedoption is recognized over the requisite vesting period which is deemed to be equal to the term of the security.

On October 28, 2021, the Company entered into an Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Jason May (“May”), pursuant to which the Company has engaged May on a non-exclusive basis to assist with the growth of the Company’s energy beverage product line. In connection with entry into the Agreement, the Company issued May an option to purchase 1,673,994 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price per share of $0.70. These options will vest in two equal tranches upon the achievement of certain net revenue milestones related to the Company’s energy beverage products. The estimated fair value of this grant is $2 million and was determined by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Once a derivative liability ceases to exist any remainingoption pricing model with an average term of 7.5 years; annual volatility rate of 208%; discount rate of 1.44%; and 0% for dividend rate. The fair value of option is reclassifiedrecognized over the requisite vesting period which is deemed to additional paidbe equal to the term of the security.

On December 21, 2021, as discussed above, the Company entered an agreement under the 2021 Plan with Sabina Rizvi, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company to issue an option to purchase 1,811,000 shares of common stock of the Company, exercisable at a price of $0.40. The estimated fair value of this grant is $721,000 and was determined by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with a term of 7 years; annual volatility rate of 208%; discount rate of 1.39%; and 0% for dividend rate. The fair value of option is recognized over the requisite vesting period. Upon issuance of this option, the previous incentive compensation discussed above was terminated and all related stock compensation expense recorded in capital.2021 was reversed.

For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company recorded approximately $653,000 and $144,000 of stock-based compensation expense related to stock options.

F-32

 

Deferred Equity Costs

Stock Options Summary Table

The following table describes the total options outstanding, granted, exercised, expired and forfeited as of and during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, as well as the total options exercisable as of December 31, 2021.

Summary of Stock Options Outstanding, Granted, Exercised, Expired and Forfeited

  Options Outstanding  Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share  Weighted Average Fair Value of Options  Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)  Aggregate Intrinsic Value 
Issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2019  171,703  $1.89   2  $6.17  $ 
Granted               
Exercised               
Forfeited               
Issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2020  171,703  $1.89  $1.72  $6.17  $ 
Granted  5,227,738   0.74   0.74   4.19    
Exercised               
Forfeited               
Issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2021  5,399,441  $0.74  $0.74  $4.19    
Exercisable as of December 31, 2021               

Note 15. Defined Contribution Plan

The Company established a 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) for eligible employees of the Company. Generally, all employees of the Company who are at least twenty-one years of age and who have completed six months of service are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan. The 401(k) Plan is a defined contribution plan that provides that participants may make voluntary salary deferral contributions, on a pretax basis, in the form of voluntary payroll deductions. The Company may pay costs related to the underwriting and offering of equity securities. These costs are treated as a reduction to equity capital raised and recorded in equity when the share issuances are recorded. Until the shares are recorded or until offering is aborted, these costs will be held on the balance sheet as a deferred asset.

Debt Issue Costs and Debt Discount

The Company may pay debt issue costs, and record debt discounts in connection with raising funds through the issuance of convertible debt. These costs are amortized over the lifemake discretionary matching contributions. For each of the debt to interest expense. If a conversionyears ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company’s matching contributions were approximately $55,000 and $87,000 respectively.

Note 16. Net Income (Loss) per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of the underlying debt occurs, a proportionateCompany’s basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the years presented (in thousands, except share and per share data):

Schedule of the unamortized amounts is immediately expensed.

Original Issue Discount

For certain convertible debt issued, the Company provides the debt holder with an original issue discount. The original issue discount is recorded to debt discountBasic and additional paid-in capital at an amount not to exceed gross proceeds raised, reducing the face amount of the debt, and is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt.

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

Share-Based Payments

Generally, all forms of share-based payments, including stock option grants, warrants and restricted stock grants and stock appreciation rights are measured at their fair value on the awards’ grant date, based on estimated number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Share-based compensation awards issued to non- employees for services rendered are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the fair value of the share-based payment, whichever is more readily determinable.

Earnings (Loss)Diluted Net Income (loss) Per Share

  2021  2020 
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Net Income (loss) $(12,866) $3,185 
Weighted average common shares used in computing net income (loss) per share, basic  33,386,200   32,812,462 
Potentially diluted securities     8,359,999 
Weighted average common shares used in computing net income (loss) per share, diluted  33,386,200   41,172,461 
Net income (loss) per share, basic $(0.39) $0.10 
Net income (loss) per share, diluted $(0.39) $0.08 

Net earningsBasic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) less preferred dividends for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period.

Diluted earningsnet income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) less preferred dividends for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock, common stock equivalents and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during each period. The Company uses the treasury stock method to determine whether there is a dilutive effect of outstanding potentially dilutive securities, and the if-converted method to assess the dilutive effect of the convertible notes.

SinceThe Company reported a net income for the year ended December 31, 2020. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company reflectedincurred a net loss, in which 16,154,795 potentially dilutive securities related to Mr. Drexler’s convertible notes outstanding were excluded in the computation for the diluted net income per share for the year ended December 31, 2021, but included in the computation for the year ended December 31, 2020.

F-33

The following securities were excluded from the computations of the diluted net income (loss) per share, for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 as the effect of the securities would be anti-dilutive:

Schedule of Outstanding Potentially Dilutive Securities

  2021  2020 
Stock options 5,399,441  $171,703 
Warrants  17,355,700   - 
Convertible notes  16,154,795   - 
Total common stock equivalents 38,909,936  $171,703 

The average exercise price of the stock options and warrants as of December 31, 2021 is $0.80 and $0.78, respectively.

Note 17. Income Taxes

The components of income (loss) before provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 20122021 and 2011, respectively, the effect2020 are as follows (in thousands):

Schedule of considering any common stock equivalents, if exercisable, would have been anti-dilutive. A separate computationComponents of diluted earnings (loss) per share is not presented.

The Company has the following common stock equivalents as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

  As of December 31, 
  2012  2011 
Stock options (exercise price – $425/share)  1,847   1,903 
Warrants (exercise price – $12.75 - $1,275/share)  89   72,584 
Convertible Series C Preferred Stock (conversion price $8.50/share)  -   23 
Convertible debt (conversion price – $1.70- $17/share)  -   527,757 
Total common stock equivalents  1,936   602,267 

In the above table, some of the outstanding instruments from 2011 contain ratchet provisions that would cause variability in the exercise price at the balance sheet date. As a result, common stock equivalents could change.

Foreign Currency

MusclePharm began operations in Canada in April 2012. The Canadian Dollar was determined to be the functional currency as the majority of the transactions related to the day to day operations of the business are exchanged in Canadian Dollars. At the end of the period, the financial results of the Canadian operation are translated into the U.S. Dollar, which is the reporting currency, and added to the U.S. operationsIncome (Loss) Before Provision for consolidated company financial results. The revenue and expense items are translated using the average rate for the period and the assets and liabilities at the end of period rate. Transactions that have completed the accounting cycle and resulted in a gain or loss related to translation are recorded in realized gain or loss due to foreign currency translation under other income expense on the income statement. Transactions that have not completed their accounting cycle but appear to have gain or loss due to the translation process are recorded as unrealized gain or loss due to translation and held in the equity section on the balance sheet until such date the accounting cycle of the transaction is complete and the actual realized gain or loss is recognized.

Reclassification

The Company has reclassified certain prior period amounts in the net cash used in operating activities section of the statement of cash flows to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications were for presentation purposes had no effect net cash used in operating activities for the periods presented.

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04 “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in GAAP and IFRS”. ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between GAAP and the International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). ASU 2011-04 requires reporting entities to disclose additional information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, ASU 2011-04 requires reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. This pronouncement has been implemented in the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 without impact.

Note 3: Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following at December 31, 2012 and 2011:

  2012  2011  Estimated Useful
Life
Furniture, fixtures and gym equipment $1,323,998  $781,786  3 years
Leasehold improvements  563,204   244,770  From 42 to 64 months
Vehicles  100,584   37,068  5 years
Displays  32,057   32,057  5 years
Website  11,462   11,462  3 years
Total  2,031,305   1,107,143   
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (674,941)  (199,621)  
  $1,356,364  $907,522   

Note 4: Debt

At December 31, 2012 and 2011, debt consists of the following:

  2012  2011 
       
Convertible debt - secured $-  $1,749,764 
Less: debt discount  -   (1,395,707)
Convertible debt - net  -   354,057 
         
Auto loan - secured  15,380   26,236 
         
Unsecured debt  4,452,183   2,380,315 
Less: debt discount  -   (1,171,626)
Unsecured debt - net  4,452,183   1,208,689 
         
Total debt  4,467,563   1,588,982 
         
Less: current portion  (4,463,040)  (1,281,742)
         
Long term debt $4,523  $307,240 

Debt in default of $64,600 and $505,600 at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, is included as a component of short-term debt.

Future annual principal payments for the above debt is as follows:   
    
Years Ending December 31,    
2013 $4,463,040 
2014  4,523 
Total annual principal payments $4,467,563 

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

Convertible Debt – Secured – Derivative Liabilities

During years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company issued convertible debt totaling $519,950 and $4,679,253, respectively. The convertible debt includes the following terms:

    Year Ended December 31, 
    2012  2011 
    Amount of  Amount of 
    Principal Raised  Principal Raised 
Interest Rate    8% - 10%   0% - 18% 
Default interest rate    0% - 20%   0% - 25% 
Maturity    January 3, 2012 to October 11, 2014   June 30, 2011 to June 29, 2015 
           
Conversion terms 1 Lesser of (1) a fifty percent (50%) discount to the two lowest closing bid prices of the five days trading days immediately preceding the date of conversion or (ii) twenty one dollars and twenty five cents ($21.25) per share $-  $525,000 
Conversion terms 2 200% - The “market price” will be equal to the average of (i) the average of the closing price of Company’s common stock during the 10 trading days immediately preceding the date hereof and (ii) the average of the 10 trading days immediately subsequent to the date hereof.  -   537,600 
Conversion terms 3 200% of face. Average of the trading price 10 trading days immediately preceding the closing of the transaction  -   177,000 
Conversion terms 4 200% of face. Fixed conversion price of $17.00  -   105,000 
Conversion terms 5 300% of face. Fixed conversion price of $17.00  -   15,000 
Conversion terms 6 35% of the three lowest trading prices for previous 10 trading days      250,000 
Conversion terms 7 45% of the three lowest trading prices for previous 10 trading days  -   327,500 
Conversion terms 8 50% of average closing prices for 10 preceding trading days  -   76,353 
Conversion terms 9 50% of lowest trade price for the last 20 trading days  -   45,000 
Conversion terms 10 50% of the 3 lowest trades for previous 20 trading days  -   33,000 
Conversion terms 11 50% of the lowest closing price for previous 5 trading days  -   250,000 
Conversion terms 12 60% multiplied by the average of the lowest 3 trading prices for common stock during the ten trading days prior to the conversion date  -   233,000 
Conversion terms 13 62% of lowest trade price for the last 7 trading days  100,000   40,000 
Conversion terms 14 65% of the lowest trade price in the 30 trading days previous to the conversion  19,950   335,000 
Conversion terms 15 65% of the three lowest trading price for previous 30 trading days  -   153,800 
Conversion terms 16 70% of lowest average trading price for 30 trading days  -   1,366,000 
Conversion terms 17 No fixed conversion option  -   35,000 
Conversion terms 18 35% multiplied by the average of the lowest three (3) trading prices (as defined below) for the common stock during the ten (10) trading day period ending on the latest complete trading day prior to the conversion date.  400,000   75,000 
Conversion terms 19 Fixed conversion price of $25.50  -   100,000 
    $519,950  $4,679,253 

The debt holders are entitled, at their option, to convert all or part of the principal and accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock at the conversion prices and terms discussed above. The Company classifies embedded conversion features in these notes as a derivative liability due to management’s assessment that the Company may not have sufficient authorized number of shares of common stock required to net-share settle or due to the existence of a ratchet due to an anti-dilution provision. See Note 5 regarding accounting for derivative liabilities.

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company converted debt and accrued interest, totaling $1,420,422 into 290,961 shares of common stock. The resulting loss on conversion of $351,021 is included in the $4,447,732 loss on settlement of accounts payable and debt as shown in the consolidated statement of operations. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company converted debt and accrued interest, totaling $5,126,809 into 346,282 shares of common stock resulting in a loss on conversion of $1,739,329

During the year ended December 31, 2012, $14,000 of convertible notes matured without conversion. These notes became demand loans and were reclassified as unsecured debt. Derivative liabilities associated with these notes were eliminated given the expiration of the embedded conversion option. During the year ended December 31, 2011, $585,000 of convertible notes matured without conversion. These notes became demand loans and were reclassified as unsecured debt. Derivative liabilities associated with these notes were eliminated given the expiration of the embedded conversion option.

(A) Convertible Debt

Convertible debt consisted of the following activity and terms:

     Interest Rate Maturity
Balance - December 31, 2010 $605,000     
        
Borrowings during the year ended December 31, 2011  4,652,900  0% - 18% January 30,2011 to June 29, 2015
Reclassifications from convertible notes to unsecured demand notes  (585,000)    
Conversion  of debt to into 298,897 shares of common stock with a valuation of $4,268,857 ($2.72 - $85.85/share)  (2,923,136)    
Balance - December 31, 2011  1,749,764     
Borrowings during the year ended December 31, 2012  519,950  8% - 10% January 3, 2012 to October 11, 2014
Conversion of debt into 246,744 shares of common stock with a valuation of $950,739 ($2.98 - $8.08/share)  (759,095)    
Repayment of convertible debt  (2,518,343)    
Interest and accrued interest (Included in total repayment)  15,632     
Loss on repayment (Included in total repayment)  1,006,092     
Expiration of conversion option  (14,000)    
Balance – December 31, 2012 $-     

(B) Secured Debt

Secured debt consisted of the following activity and terms:

     Interest Rate Maturity
Secured Debt balance as of December 31, 2010 $187,500  0%May 18, 2010 - May 26, 2010
Conversion  of debt to into 8,824 shares of common stock with a valuation of $437,500 ($49.30 - $50.15/share)  (187,500)    
Balance as of December 31, 2011  -     
Borrowings during the year ended December 31, 2012  -     
Secured Debt balance as of December 31, 2012 $-     

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

(C) Unsecured Debt

Unsecured debt consisted of the following activity and terms:

     Interest Rate Maturity
Unsecured Debt balance as of December 31, 2010 $78,249     
Borrowings during the year ended December 31, 2011  1,960,000  8% - 15 % February 8, 2011 - June 21, 2014
Reclassifications from convertible notes to unsecured demand notes  585,000     
Conversion of debt to into 38,562 shares of common stock with a valuation of $420,452 ($8.50 - $42.50/share)  (167,649)    
Repayments  (75,285)    
Balance – December 31, 2011  2,380,315     
Borrowings during the year ended December 31, 2012  5,304,000  15% - 110 % January 13, 2012 – October 1, 2013
Conversion of debt into 44,208 shares of common stock with a valuation of $469,683 ($8.08 - $13.60/share)  (150,000)    
Repayments  (3,318,374)    
Convertible debt added upon expiration of option  14,000     
         
Balance adjustments  117     
Interest and accrued interest (Included in total repayment)  31,896     
         
Loss on repayment (Included in total repayment)  190,229     
Balance – December 31, 2012 $4,452,183     

(D) Vehicle Loan

Vehicle loan account consisted of the following activity and terms:

     Interest Rate Maturity
Balance - December 31, 2010 $-     
Non-Cash fixed asset additions during the year ended December 31, 2011  32,568  6.99% 36 payments of $1,008
Repayments  (6,332)    
Balance - December 31, 2011  26,236  6.99% 24 payments of $1,008
Repayments  (10,856)    
Balance – December 31, 2012 $15,380     

(E) Debt Issue Costs

During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company paid debt issue costs totaling $662,209 and $263,283, respectively.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 22,633 warrants as cost associated with a debt raise. The initial derivative liability value of $427,759 was recorded as debt issue costs and derivative liability.

The following is a summary of the Company’s debt issue costs for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

  2012  2011 
Debt issuance costs $851,923  $305,283 
Accumulated amortization of debt issuance costs  (516,490)  (237,095)
Debt issuance costs – net $335,433  $68,188 

During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company amortized $394,964 and $229,499, respectively in debt issuance costs.

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

(F) Debt Discount

During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded debt discounts totaling $3,554,673 and $5,473,291, respectively.

The debt discounts recorded in 2012 and 2011 pertain to convertible debt and warrants that contain embedded conversion options that are required to be bifurcated and reported at fair value.

The Company amortized $6,122,006 and $3,237,219 to interest expense in the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 as follows:

Debt discount – December 31, 2010 $5,804,552 
Amortization of debt discount – year ended December 31, 2011  (3,237,219)
Debt discount – December 31, 2011  2,567,333 
Additional debt discount – year ended December 31, 2012  3,554,673 
Amortization of debt discount – year ended December 31, 2012  (6,122,006)
Debt discount – December 31, 2012 $- 

Note 5: Derivative Liabilities

The Company identified conversion features embedded within convertible debt, warrants and Series C Preferred Stock issued in 2012, 2011 and (see Notes 4 and 8). The Company has determined that the features associated with the embedded conversion option should be accounted for at fair value as a derivative liability as the Company could not determine if a sufficient number of shares would be available to settle all transactions.

The fair value of the conversion feature is summarized as follows:

Derivative liability - December 31, 2010 $622,944 
Fair value at the commitment date for convertible instruments  6,590,351 
Fair value at the commitment date for warrants issued  5,650,576 
Fair value at the commitment date for Series A, Preferred Stock issued  293 
Fair value mark to market adjustment for convertible instruments  (2,293,164)
Fair value mark to market adjustment for warrants  (2,868,818)
Fair value mark to market adjustment for Series A, Preferred Stock issued  (118)
Reclassification to additional paid in capital for financial instruments that ceased to be a derivative liability  (640,826)
Derivative liability - December 31, 2011  7,061,238 
Fair value at the commitment date for debt instruments  1,096,808 
Fair value at the commitment date for warrants issued  7,526,671 
Fair value mark to market adjustment for debt instruments  (1,579,663)
Fair value mark to market adjustment for warrants  (4,345,916)
Fair value mark to market adjustment for Series C Preferred Stock issued  (59)
Reclassification to additional paid-in capital for financial instruments conversions and maturities  (4,124,387)
Warrant settlements  (5,634,692)
Derivative liability – December 31, 2012 $- 

The Company recorded the debt discount to the extent of the gross proceeds raised, and expensed immediately the remaining value of the derivative as it exceeded the gross proceeds of the note. The Company recorded a derivative expense of $4,409,214 and $4,777,654 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

The fair value at the commitment and re-measurement dates for the Company’s derivative liabilities were based upon the following management assumptions as of December 31, 2012:

Commitment DateRe-measurement Date
Expected dividends0%N/A
Expected volatility228% -251%N/A
Expected term:6 months – 4 yearsN/A
Risk free interest rate0.09% - 0.72%N/A

The fair value at the commitment and re-measurement dates for the Company’s derivative liabilities were based upon the following management assumptions as of December 31, 2011:

  Commitment Date  Re-measurement Date 
Expected dividends  0%  0%
Expected volatility  150% -226%  150% -226%
Expected term:  0.02 – 5 years   0.02 – 5 years 
Risk free interest rate  0.06% - 2.76%  0.09% - 0.31%

Note 6: Restricted Stock Units

In November 2012, the Company granted the COO, John H. Bluher, 70,589 restricted stock units through a restricted stock unit agreement. Each restricted stock unit represents a contingent right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock upon vesting. The value of this award at the grant date was $245,400 and will be amortized over the vesting periods such that each tranche of restricted stock units will be fully amortized at the date of vesting.  The restricted stock units will vest in tranche of 23,529 on January 1, 2013 and two tranches of 23,530 shares on January 1, 2014 and December 1, 2014.  As of December 31, 2012, no restricted stock units have vested and the unamortized portion of this award is $163,600.

In November 2012, the Company granted the CFO, L. Gary Davis, 58,824 restricted stock units through a restricted stock unit agreement. Each restricted stock unit represents a contingent right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock upon vesting. The value of this award at the grant date was $204,500 and will be amortized over the vesting periods such that each tranche of restricted stock units will be fully amortized at the date of vesting.  The restricted stock units will vest in three tranches of 19,608 shares on January 1, 2013 and 2014, and December 1, 2014.  As of December 31, 2012, no restricted stock units have vested and the unamortized portion of this award $136,333.

Note 7: Income Taxes

  2021  2020 
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Domestic $(12,874) $3,160 
Foreign     6 
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes $(12,874) $3,166 

Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the consolidated financial statements and consist of taxes currently due. Deferred taxes relate to differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting which will be either taxable or deductible when the assets or liabilities are recovered or settled.

At December 31, 2012, theThe Company has afederal net operating loss carry-forwardcarryforwards of approximately $23,940,000 available to offset future taxable income expiring through 2032.$49.2 million and $42 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, of which $14.2 million will expire between 2031 and 2038 and $35 million can be carried forward indefinitely. The Company has estimated state net operating loss carryforwards of $41 million and $32 million as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, most of which will expire between 2026 and 2040. Utilization of futurethe Company’s federal and certain state net operating losses may be limitedis subject to limitation due to potentialthe ownership changes under Section 382 ofchange limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code Sec. 382 and similar state provisions. Such an annual limitation results in the expiration of 1986,the net operating loss carryforwards before utilization. The Company believes that utilization of its federal and certain state net operating losses is substantially limited as amended (the “Code”).a result of the conversion of Mr. Drexler’s convertible note in September 2019. Accordingly, for financial reporting purposes, the Company has recorded a significant decrease in the federal and net operating loss carryforwards for the year ended December 31, 2020.

The valuation allowance atas of December 31, 20112021 and 2020 was approximately $8,570,000.$16.3 million and $13.6 million, respectively. The net change in valuation allowance duringfor the year ended December 31, 20122021 was an an increase of approximately $5,087,000.$2.8 million and for the year ended December 31, 2020 was a decrease of $18.7 million. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred income tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.

Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred income tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based on consideration of these items, management has determined that enough uncertainty exists relative to the realization of the deferred income tax asset balances to warrant the application of a full valuation allowance as of December 31, 2012.

MusclePharm Corporation2021 and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)2020.

 

F-34

The effects of temporary differences that gave rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets atas of December 31, 20122021 and 2011,2020, are approximately as follows:follows (in thousands):

Schedule of Portions of Deferred Tax Assets

  December 31, 2012  December 31, 2011 
Net operating loss carry forward $8,871,000  $6,061,000 
Amortization of debt discount and debt issue costs  3,732,000   1,465,000 
Stock options and warrants  971,000   971,000 
Depreciation  74,000   - 
Bad debt  9,000   73,000 
Valuation allowance  (13,657,000)  (8,570,000)
Net deferred tax asset $-  $- 
  2021  2020 
  As of December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Deferred tax assets:        
Net operating loss carryforwards  12,988   10,656 
Stock compensation $433  $290 
Other  2,891   2,606 
Gross deferred tax assets $16,312  $13,552 
Valuation allowance  (16,312)  (13,552)
Net deferred tax assets $-  $- 

There was noThe income tax expensebenefit for the years ended December 31, 20122021 and 2011,2020 included the following (in thousands):

Schedule of Income Tax (Benefit) Provision

  2021  2020 
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Current income tax benefit:        
Federal $-  $- 
State  (8)  (19)
Foreign     10 
Current income tax expense  (8)  (9)
Deferred income tax benefit:        
Federal      
State      
Foreign      
Deferred income tax provision      
Benefit for income taxes, net $(8) $(9)

The income tax benefit differs from those computed using the statutory federal tax rate of 21% due to the Company’s net losses.following (in thousands):

Schedule of Income Tax (Benefit) Provision Differs from Those Computed Using the Statutory Federal Tax Rate

  2021  2020 
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Expected provision at statutory federal rate $2,700 $665 
State tax — net of federal benefit  (6)  18 
Foreign income/losses taxed at different rates     9 
Other  200  (38)
Change in valuation allowance  (2,902)  (663)
Income tax benefit $(8) $(9)

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits (“UTB’s”) is as follows (in thousands):

Schedule of Reconciliation of the Beginning and Ending Amount of Unrecognized Tax Benefits

  2021  2020 
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Gross UTB’s, beginning balance $  $128 
Reductions for tax positions taken in a prior year     (128)
Gross UTB’s, ending balance      

F-35

 

The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax benefits in its provision for income taxes. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company has not recorded a liability for potential interest or penalties. The Company also does not expect its unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next 12 months.

The Company is subject to taxation in the U.S., as well as various state and foreign jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2021, the Company’s statute is open from 2018, 2017 and 2016 forward for federal, state and foreign tax purposes, respectively. However, years prior to 2016 could still be considered open for adjustments to net operating loss carryforwards.

On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed into law the CARES Act. Among the changes to the U.S. federal income tax, the CARES Act restored net operating loss carryback rules that were eliminated by 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, modified the limit on the deduction for net interest expense differsand accelerated the timeframe for refunds of AMT credits. Based on an analysis of the impact of the CARES Act, the Company has not identified any overall material effect on the 2021 and 2020 tax liabilities.

Note 18. Segment Information and Geographic Data

Historically, the Company’s chief operating decision maker reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. As such, the Company has had a single reporting segment and operating unit structure. During the third quarter of 2021, the Company introduced a functional energy beverages line under the MusclePharm and FitMiss brands, at which time, the CODM commenced reviewing financial information on a disaggregated basis with the functional energy drink business separate from base business of protein products. During 2021, revenues for the “expected” tax expense forfunctional energy drink segment was not material, but it is anticipated to become a more significant segment of the Company’s business going forward. (All amounts below are in thousands);

Schedule of Significant Segment Business Going Forward

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Revenue, net        
Protein products $49,468  $64,440 
Energy drinks  574    
Total revenue, net $50,042  $64,440 

Schedule of Business Revenue and Profits

  For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 
  Revenue  Cost of Revenue  Gross Profit 
Protein products $49,468  $44,354  $5,114 
Energy drinks  574   317   257 
Total $50,042  $44,671  $5,371 

As the Company’s products are made through contract manufacturers’, there were no capital expenditures related to either segment during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, (computed by applying the federal corporate tax rate of 34% to loss before taxes and 4.63% for Colorado State Corporate Taxes, the blended rate used was 37.1%), are approximately as follows:2021 or 2020.

  December 31, 2012  December 31, 2011 
Federal tax benefit at statutory rate $(6,493,000) $(7,916,000)
State tax benefit – net of federal tax effect  (418,000)  (501,000)
Derivative expense  1,499,000   1,625,000 
Change in fair value of derivative liability  (2,006,000)  (1,755,000)
Loss on settlement of accounts payable  1,495,000   1,313,000 
Non-deductible stock compensation  791,000   1,091,000 
Other non-deductible expenses  45,000   68,000 
Change in valuation allowance  5,087,000   6,075,000 
Income tax benefit $-  $- 

Note 8: Stockholders’ deficit

The Company has four separate series of authorized preferred stock:

On November 26, 2012, the Company (i) effected a 1-for-850 reverse stock split of our common stock, including a proportionate reduction in the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 2.36 billion sharessold products through their distribution channels to 2.8 million shares of common stock, and (ii) amended our articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock (post reverse stock split) from 2,941,177 to 100 million effective November 27, 2012.  All share and per share amounts in this document have been changed to give effect to the reverse stock split.

(A) Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

The shares of Series A have the following provisions:

·Non-voting,

·No rights to dividends,

·No liquidation value,

·Convertible into 200 shares of common stock.

F-21

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

(B) Series B Preferred Stock (Related Parties)

In August 2011, the Company issued an aggregate 51 shares of Series B Preferred Stock to two of its officers and directors. The Company accounted for the share issuance at par value as there was no future economic value that could be associated with the issuance.

The shares of Series B have the following provisions:

·Voting rights entitling the holders to an aggregate 51% voting control;

·Initially no rights to dividends;

·Stated value of $0.001 per share;

·Liquidation rights entitle the receipt of net assets on a pro-rata basis; and

·Non-convertible.

(C) Series C Convertible Preferred Stock

In October 2011, the Company issued 190 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, having a fair value of $190,000. Of the total shares issued, 100 shares were issued for $100,000 ($1,000 /share). The remaining 90 shares were issued for services rendered having a fair value of $90,000 ($1,000 /share), based upon the stated value per share. In March 2012, all 190 shares were converted into 22,353 common shares at a conversion price of $0.0085 per share and a loss of $614,984.

The shares of Series C have the following provisions:

·Stated Value - $1,000 per share;

·Non-voting;

·Liquidation rights entitle an amount equal to the stated value, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends;

·As long as any Series C, convertible preferred stock is outstanding, the Company is prohibited from executing various corporate actions without the majority consent of the holders of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock authorization; and

·Convertible at the higher of (a) $8.50 or (b) such price that is a 50% discount to market using the average of the low 2 closing bid prices, 5 days preceding conversion.

Due to the existence of an option to convert at a variable amount, the Company treated this series of preferred stock as a derivative liability due to the potential for settlement in a variable quantity of shares. Additionally, the Company computed the fair value of the derivative liability at the commitment date and remeasurement date, which was $293 and $175, respectively, using the Black-Scholes valuation model. This transaction is analogous to a dividend with a direct charge to retained earnings.

(D) Series D Convertible Preferred Stock

In January 2013 the Board of Directors authorized 1,600,000 shares of Series D convertible preferred stock.

The shares of Series D have the following provisions:

·Voting rights based on number of common shares of conversion option;

·Initially no rights to dividends;

·Liquidation rights entitle the receipt of net assets on a pro-rata basis; and

·Convertible into 2 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment.

Subsequent to year end, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of Series D preferred stock. Refer to Note 12 for details on this transaction.

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

(E) Common Stock

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued the following common stock:

Transaction Type Quantity  Valuation
($)
  Loss on
Settlement
($)
  Range of
Value
per Share
($)
 
Conversion of convertible debt  246,753   950,739   61,124   2.98 - 8.08 
Conversion of unsecured/secured debt  44,208   469,683   289,897   8.08 - 13.60 
Forbearance of agreement terms  95,528   1,240,032   -   7.14 - 27.54 
Cash and warrants  199,422   1,660,760   -   7.59 - 8.50 
Executive compensation(1)  431,034   4,686,514   -   8.93 - 17.71 
Stock issued for future services  113,740   1,107,719   -   4.75 - 21.25 
Conversion of Series C Preferred Stock to common stock  22,353   614,984   614,984   27.51 
Warrant Conversions/Settlements  853,082   7,295,768   1,505,906   5.44 - 15.73 
Stock issued in lieu of interest  58,945   334,099   -   5.50 – 10.62 
Additional shares due to roundup provision of certificates upon reverse split  561   -   -   - 
Total  2,065,626   18,360,298   2,471,911   0.00 – 27.54 

(1)Represents common stock issued for prior year 2011 accrued compensation of $4,667,764 settled in 2012 and directors awards.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued the following common stock:

Transaction Type Quantity  Valuation
($)
  Range of Value
per Share
($)
 
Conversion of convertible debt  298,897   4,268,857   2.55-85.00 
Conversion of unsecured/secured debt  47,386   857,952   42.50-51.00 
Settlement of accounts payable and accrued expenses(4)  64,172   3,646,719   25.50-102.00 
Extension of debt maturity date  11,030   161,250   14.45-17.00 
Services – rendered  54,731   1,199,844   0.00-977.50 
Cash and warrants  96,471   875,000   25.50 
Services – prepaid stock compensation(2)  4,706   214,250   42.50-68.00 
Cancelled shares (3)  (4,118)  -   25.50 
Total  573,275   11,223,872   0.00-977.50 

The fair value of all stock issuances above is based upon the quoted closing trading price on the date of issuance, except for stock and warrants issued for cash, which is based on the cash received.

(1) Settlement of Warrants to Purchase Common Stock

In September 2012, the Company began the settlement of all outstanding valued warrant contracts in an effort to reduce financial statement fluctuations due to these instruments. The Company issued 512,631 shares of common stock to several accredited investors pursuant to conversions of warrants to purchase an aggregate of 723,746 shares of common stock in September and issued 3,677 shares of common stock pursuant to conversions of a warrant to purchase 4,902 shares of common stock in December 2012. Related to these efforts, the Company did not have any valued warrant contracts outstanding at December 31, 2012.

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

(2) Prepaid Stock Compensation

The following represents the allocation of prepaid stock compensation as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

Prepaid stock compensation – December 31, 2010  1,965,911 
Prepaid stock compensation additions during the year ended December 31, 2011  214,250 
Non cash increase in accounts payable related to future services to be paid for with common stock  100,000 
Amortization of prepaid stock compensation  (1,745,705)
Prepaid stock compensation – December 31, 2011  534,456 
Prepaid stock compensation additions during the year ended December 31, 2012  110,000 
Amortization of prepaid stock compensation  (599,708)
Prepaid stock compensation – December 31, 2012 $44,748 

The following represents the allocation of prepaid stock compensation at December 31, 2012:

Prepaid expense that will be amortized in 2013$44,748

(3) Cancelled Shares

The Company cancelled 4,118 sharesover 20 countries during the year ended December 31, 2011, valued at par ($0.001). The Company has disputed the issuance of these shares due to non-performance by a consultant. These shares were originally issued in 2010 as a component of stock issued for services rendered.

(4) Settlement of Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses and Loss on Settlement

The Company settled $1,523,590 in accounts payable and recorded a loss on settlement of $2,123,129.

Loss on settlement of accounts payable and accrued expenses $2,123,129 
Loss on settlement of debt (Note 4)  1,739,329 
Total loss on settlement $3,862,458 

(F) Stock Options

On February 1, 2010, the Company's board of directors and shareholders approved the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan ("2010 Plan"). The 2010 Plan allows the Company to grant incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights to key employees, directors consultants, advisors and service providers of the Company or its subsidiaries. Any stock option granted in the form of an incentive stock option will be intended to comply with the requirements of Section 422 of the Code. Only stock options granted to employees qualify for incentive stock option treatment. No incentive stock option shall be granted after February 1, 2020, which is 10 years from the date the 2010 Plan was initially adopted. A stock option may be exercised in whole or in installments, which may be cumulative. Shares of common stock purchased upon the exercise of a stock option must be paid for in full at the time of the exercise in cash or such other consideration determined by the compensation committee. Payment may include tendering shares of common stock or surrendering of a stock award, or a combination of methods.

The 2010 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has full and exclusive power within the limitations set forth in the 2010 Plan to make all decisions and determinations regarding the selection of participants and the granting of awards; establishing the terms and conditions relating to each award; adopting rules, regulations and guidelines; and interpreting the 2010 Plan. The Compensation Committee will determine the appropriate mix of stock options and stock awards to be granted to best achieve the objectives of the 2010 Plan. The 2010 Plan may be amended by the Board or the compensation committee, without the approval of stockholders, but no such amendments may increase the number of shares issuable under the 2010 Plan or adversely affect any outstanding awards without the consent of the holders thereof. The total number of shares that may be issued shall not exceed 5,883, subject to adjustment in the event of certain recapitalizations, reorganizations and similar transactions.

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

On April 2, 2010, the Company issued 3,255 stock options, having a fair value of $630,990, which was expensed immediately since all stock options vested immediately.  These stock options expire on April 2, 2015.

The Company applied fair value accounting for all share based payments awards. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes assumptions used when the options were issued in the year ended December 31, 2010 are as follows:

Exercise price $425 
Expected dividends  0%
Expected volatility  74.8%
Risk fee interest rate  1.4%
Expected life of option  5 years 
Expected forfeiture  0%

The following is a summary of the Company’s stock option activity:

  Options  Weighted Average
Exercise Price
  Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
  Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
 
Balance – December 31, 2010  3,255  $425.00   4.25 years     
Granted  -   -         
Exercised  -   -         
Forfeited/Cancelled  (1,353) $425.00         
Balance – December 31, 2011  1,902  $425.00   3.25 years   - 
Granted  -             
Exercised  -             
Forfeited/Cancelled  (53) $425.00         
Balance – December 31, 2012 – outstanding  1,847  $425.00   2.25 years   - 
Balance – December 31, 2012 – exercisable  1,847  $425.00   2.25 years   - 
                 
Outstanding options held by related parties – 2012  1,847             
Exercisable options held by related parties – 2012  1,847             
Outstanding options held by related parties – 2011  1,177             
Exercisable options held by related parties – 2011  1,177             

(F) Stock Warrants

All warrants issued during years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were accounted for as derivative liabilities. See Note 5.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company entered into convertible note and unsecured note agreements. As part of these agreements, the Company issued warrants to purchase 500,721 shares of common stock. Each warrant vests six months after issuance and expire July 13, 2014 – October 16, 2014, with exercise prices ranging from $10.20 - $12.75. All warrants contain anti-dilution rights, and are treated as derivative liabilities. All warrants issued during the year ended December 31, 2012, were converted in 2012.

During 2011, the Company entered into convertible and unsecured note agreements. As part of these agreements, the Company issued warrants to purchase 191,045 shares of common stock. Each warrant vests six month after issuance and expire July 14, 2013 – June 28, 2016, with exercise prices ranging from $12.75 - $51.00.

During 2011, the Company issued 141,412 warrants for services performed. The warrants have a vesting range of immediate to six months after issuance and expire February 28, 2014 – April 15, 2016, with exercise prices ranging from $1.70 - $85.00. The value of the warrants, $1,989,982, calculated using the below black-scholes assumptions, was expensed as compensation with the offset being recorded to derivative liabilities, since the Company applied the provisions of ASC No. 815, pertaining to the potential settlement in a variable amount of shares.

F-25

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

A summary of warrant activity for the Company for the years ended December 31, 20122021 and 20112020. All of the Company’s assets are located in the United States.

F-36

Geographic Information:

Revenue, classified by the major geographic areas in which our customers are located is as follows:

Schedule of Revenue, Major Geographical Areas

  Number of Warrants  Weighted Average Exercise Price 
Balance at December 31, 2010  883   1,275 
Granted  332,457   17.00 
Exercised  -   - 
Balance at December 31, 2011  333,340   20.33 
Granted  500,721   10.20 
Exercised  (37,648)  7.57 
Converted  (796,324)  10.20 
Balance at December 31, 2012  89   1,275.00 
  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
United States  70%  72%
Other Countries  30%  28%
Total revenue  100%  100%

Warrants Outstanding  Warrants Exercisable   
Range of
Exercise Prices
  Number
Outstanding
  Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life (in
years)
  Weighted Average
Exercise Price
  Number
Exercisable
 Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
  Intrinsic Value 
$1,275   89   2.79  $1,275  89 $1,275   - 
                         
(a)No other country accounted for more than 5% of revenue during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020. Geographically, sales to other countries are diverse – spanning every continent except Antarctica.

 (G) Treasury Stock

Schedule of Revenue, Net by Geographic Area

  For the Years Ended December 31, 
  2021  2020 
Revenue, net        
Protein products        
United States $34,702  $46,578 
International  14,766   17,862 
Total Protein Products $49,468  $64,440 
         
Energy drinks        
United States  107   - 
International  467   - 
Total energy drinks $574  $- 
Total revenue, net $50,042  $64,440 

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company repurchased 31,096 shares of its common stock for the total sum of $460,978 or an average of $14.82 per share. The Company recorded the value of its common stock held in treasury at cost. The Company has not cancelled or retired these shares, and they remain available for re-issuance. The Company has a stock repurchase plan in place, but has been suspended it indefinitely.Note 19. Subsequent Events

Note 9: Commitments, Contingencies and Other MattersRelated Party Financing

(A) Operating Lease

The Company has various non-cancelable leases with terms expiring through 2015.

Future minimum annual lease payments for the above leases are approximately as follows:

Years Ended December 31,    
2013 $333,902 
2014  436,688 
2015  311,209 
Total minimum lease payments $1,081,799 

Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, was $337,584 and $154,155, respectively.

(B) Factoring Agreement

In April 2010,On March 8, 2022, the Company entered into a factoring agreementan Unsecured Revolving Promissory Note (the “Note”) with the Chairman of the Board and sold its accounts receivable.  During 2010,Chief Executive Officer of the Company was subject legal proceedings with(the “Lender”). The Company expects to initially borrow approximately $3 million under the factor, as a resultNote. Under the terms of the Company’s customersNote, proceeds may be used solely to finance the production of orders from its largest customer or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries. The Note does not remitting funds directlycontain a cap on borrowings thereunder. However, further advances under the Note are at the discretion of the Lender. Outstanding balances under the Note accrue interest at the rate of 18% per annum. Prior to maturity, the Company generally may pay down principal balances and re-borrow under the Note, subject to the factor. At December 31, 2010,discretion of the Lender to advance funds under the Note. The Note contains customary events of default and acceleration provisions.

The Note is subordinate to the 14% Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Notes previously issued by the Company. Under the terms of the First Amendment to Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2022, between the Company, no longer factored its accounts receivable.

MusclePharm CorporationRyan Drexler and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

A settlement,Empery Tax Efficient, LP (the “Amendment”), principal but not interest due under the Note generally may be repaid out of $96,783, was reached. During 2010,payments received by the Company repaid $25,000, leaving a balancein respect of $71,783 dueaccounts receivable financed pursuant to factor.  In 2011,the Note.

Bakery Barn, LLC v. MusclePharm Corporation

On January 24, 2022, Bakery Barn (“Bakery Barn”) filed suit against Company in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania court. Company received the Complaint on February 16, 2022. Bakery Barn alleges that the Company paid $10,000.owes Bakery Barn over $1.9 million dollars for breach of contract. Parties operated on an open account basis with payment terms established by mutual verbal agreement, custom and usage. Beginning in late 2020, Bakery Barn resumed production for Company and operated under a verbal agreement until August 2021. Bakery Barn contends that Company is required to reimburse Bakery Barn for foil wraps ordered by Bakery Barn in the amount of $77,800, specific ingredients totaling $42,400, and products manufactured under purchase order Invoice no. 59192 delivered to Company in the amount of $1,816,017.

F-37

 

On February 28, 2011, the remaining $65,930, inclusive of fees and interest, was settled with the issuance of 2,574 shares of common stock, having24, 2022, Flaherty Fardo Rogel & Amick, LLC (“Company Counsel”) filed a fair value of $131,206 ($51.00/share), based upon the quoted closing trading price. The Company recorded a loss on settlement of accounts payable $65,330.

(C) Legal Matters

From time to time, the Company is or may become involved in various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business or otherwise. Legal proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties as to timing, outcomes, costs, expenses and time expenditures by the Company’s management and othersPraecipe for Appearance on behalf of the Company. Although there can be no assurance, basedOn February 28, 2022, Company Counsel filed Preliminary Objections to Complaint and Brief In Support Thereof. Bakery Barn filed an Amended Complaint in Civil Action on information currently availableMarch 14, 2022. Company Counsel is in the Company’s management believesprocess of filing Preliminary Objections to this Amended Complaint. The Company intends to continue to vigorously litigate the matter.

Bar Bakers, LLC v. CFC/Flavor Producers, LLC. Vs MusclePharm

On March 18, 2022, the Company retained Barnes & Thornburg to represent it in connection with a Cross-Complaint filed Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-2019-01073098-CU-BC-CJC in the matter Bar Bakers LLC v. Creative Flavor Concepts, Inc. et al.. According to the pleadings, the matter arises from an agreement between the plaintiffs and defendants in which the plaintiff agreed to manufacturer energy bars and sell them to the defendants. The defendants then sold the energy bars to various retailers, including the Company. On May 29, 2019, the plaintiff sued the defendants alleging that the outcomedefendants were responsible for unpaid invoices – nine for bars actually manufactured and delivered to the Company and one invoice for raw materials. According to the pleadings, the unpaid invoices total $885,163.72. The invoice for the raw materials is allegedly $4,658,593.02. On January 31, 2022, one of legal proceedings that are pending or threatenedthe defendants, Flavor Producers LLC, filed and served a cross claim against the Company willalleging that it was partially responsible for any damages that may befall on it. Specifically, Flavor Producers is asking the Court to award it $389,989.60 in compensatory damages. On March 25, 2022, the Company filed an answer to that that cross claim denying the factual allegations and Flavor Producers’ assertion that it is entitled to any damages, including but not limited to, compensatory damages.

White Winston Select Asset Fund Series MP-18, LLC et al., v MusclePharm Corp., et al., (Mass. Super. Ct.)

The Company and its Chief Executive Officer have been named as defendants in a material effectnew lawsuit filed on February 8, 2022 by White Winston Select Asset Funds, LLC and White Winston Select Asset Fund Series Fund MP-18, LLC (collectively, “White Winston”) in the Superior Court of Suffolk County Massachusetts. White Winston is bringing claims alleging unfair trade practices, abuse of process, malicious prosecution, breach of duty of loyalty and, in the alternative, for breach of the settlement agreement relating to the prior action filed by White Winston in Nevada. The Company has not yet responded to complaint and at this time cannot reasonably estimate any loss that may arise from this matter.

Senior Notes Payable

On April 12, 2022, the maturity date of the Senior Notes was extended to May 28, 2022 as no event of default has occurred and the Company’s financial condition. However,cash flows from operating and investing activities (but not cash flows from financing activities) was positive for March 2022 and no event of default is reasonably expected to occur on or before April 30, 2022 and the outcomesum of anycash flows from operating and investing activities (but not from financing activities) of these matters is neither probable nor reasonably estimable.the Company and its subsidiaries will be positive for April 2022.

F-38

 

The Company was party to the following legal matters as of December 31, 2011:

MusclePharm Corporation

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

   (Unaudited)     
  (Unaudited)    
  March 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
ASSETS        
Current assets:        
Cash $534  $1,223 
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $536 and $639 at March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively  9,277   6,388 
Inventory  975   1,830 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  1,052   1,046 
Total current assets  11,838   10,487 
Property and equipment, net  4   5 
Intangible assets, net     35 
Operating lease right-of-use assets  135   203 
Total Assets $11,977  $10,730 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable $18,877  $17,980 
Accrued and other liabilities  6,654   5,942 
Obligation under secured borrowing arrangement  6,592   6,446 
Line of credit        
Operating lease liability  233   342 
Senior notes payable  7,738   4,555 
Convertible notes with a related party  5,330   5,330 
Revolving line of credit, related party  2,747    
Total Current Liabilities  48,171   40,595 
Operating lease liability, long term        
Other long term liabilities  1,861   2,326 
Total Liabilities  50,032   42,921 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)  -     
Stockholders’ deficit:        
Common stock, par value of $0.001 per share; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 33,386,200 and 33,386,200 shares issued as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively; and 33,386,200 and 33,386,200 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively   32   32 
Additional paid-in capital  183,792   183,355 
Treasury Stock at Cost, 875,621 shares   (10,039)  (10,039)
Accumulated deficit  (211,840)  (205,539)
Total Stockholders’ Deficit  (38,055)  (32,191)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit $11,977  $10,730 

(1)·Plaintiff allegedThe foregoing financial statements have been revised with respect to the Company usenumber of Creatine Nitrate in product infringed on a patent held by the Plaintiff. The Company settled this claim in 2012 for a nominal amount.
·Plaintiff alleges the Company’s use of the tagline "Train like an unchained beast" infringes on their mark "Beast" for dietary supplements. The Company settled this claim in 2012 for no consideration and agreed to modify its tagline.
·Plaintiff had filed notices of intent to commence litigation on over 200 sports nutrition and dietary supplement companies in the US and Canada, including the Company. Plaintiff alleged violations of California's Proposition 65. The Company considers this case without merit and merely an attempt by a commercial plaintiff to pressure settlements. The Company had recorded an accrual in the amount of $121,500 as of December 31, 2011 and subsequently settled this claim for $52,000 in 2012.
·Beginning in October 2009, the Company engaged in various business dealings regarding the manufacturing, sale and distribution of products with Fit Foods Manufacturing, Ltd. and Fit Foods Distribution, Inc. Jointly, "Fit Foods"). MusclePharm and Fit Foods subsequently became involved in a business dispute regarding their respective obligations and filed claims against each other in District Court. The Parties settled their dispute on December 22, 2010. The Company issued 16,456 shares of common stock, having a fair valueshares of $676,980 ($41.14/share), based upon the quoted closing trading price which settledcommon stock held in treasury, warrants, stock options and convertible notes outstanding accounts payable of $333,666, resulting in a loss on settlement of $343,314 All settlement payments have been made and the case was dismissed on July 1, 2011.

As of December 31, 2012, the Company is a party defendant in the following legal proceeding, which the Company: (a) believes is without merit; and (b) intends to defend vigorously:

·William Bossung and Bishop Equity Partners LLC v. MusclePharm Corporation , Clark County, Nevada District Court. Date instituted: January 17, 2012. Plaintiff alleges that additional monetary payments are due in respect of a settlement for outstanding warrants.
·The Tawnsaura Group, LLC v MusclePharm Corporation, Case No: 8:12-cv-01476-JVS-RNB in the United States District Court for the Central District of California .  Date instituted: September 12, 2012. Plaintiff alleges patent infringement for MusclePharm's use of Citrulline Malate in its products.  To date, Plainitiff has filed against over 70 different manufacturers of dietary supplements and sports nutrition products. MusclePharm is part of a joint defense group and believes this case is without merit due to the existence of prior art.

F-27

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

As of December 31, 2012, the Company is a party plaintiff in the following legal matter:

·MusclePharm Corporation v. Swole Sports Nutrition, LLC , United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Date instituted: March 15, 2012. The Company filed this action for trademark infringement after the Defendant started marketing and selling a dietary supplement named “Turbo Shred”. The Company has sold “Shred Matrix” since April 2, 2008, and the mark “MusclePharm Shred Matrix” was granted registration by the USPTO on September 21, 2010.

(D) Payroll Taxes

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, accounts payable and accrued expenses included approximately $143,000 and $168,000, respectively, pertaining to accrued payroll taxes. The taxes represent employee withholdings that have yet to be remitted to the taxing agencies.

(E) Product Liability

As a manufacturer of nutritional supplements and other consumer products that are ingested by consumers, the Company has been and is currently subject to various product liability claims. Although the effects of these claims to date have not been material, it is possible that current and future product liability claims could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The Company currently maintains product liability insurance with a deductible/retention of $10,000 per claim with an aggregate cap on retained loss of $5,000,000. At December 31, 2012, the Company had not recorded any accruals for product liabilities.

(F) Sponsorship and Endorsement Contract Liabilities

The Company has various non-cancelable endorsement and sponsorship agreements with terms expiring through 2013. The total value of outstanding payments as of December 31, 2012 was $2,761,950.

(G) Other Liabilities

Subsequent to December 31, 2012, the Company determined that it may have potential liabilities related to the filing of certain informational returns required by governmental authorities.  Management has developed a plan to address these matters and does not currently expect a significant adverse impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Note 10: Defined Contribution Plan

The Company has a 401(k) defined contribution plan, in which all eligible employees may participate. The 401(k) plan is a contributory plan. Matching contributions are based upon the amount of the employees’ contributions. Beginning January 1, 2012, the Company may make an additional discretionary 401(k) plan matching contribution to eligible employees. During years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s matching contribution were $42,800 and $0, respectively.

Note 11: Restricted Cash

A restricted cash fund was established in compliance with the unsecured debt agreements. At December 31, 2012, the restricted cash fund had a balance of $9,148. This fund is used to pay principal and interest for the unsecured debt agreements which had a principal balance of $3,387,586 as of December 31, 2012. Ten percent of all cash receipts from operations are put into this fund under the terms of certain debt agreements.

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

Note 12: Subsequent Events

Share Issuances

Series D Preferred Stock Offering

On January 16, 2013, the Company entered into a placement agency agreement (the “Placement Agency Agreement”) with GVC Capital LLC (the “Placement Agent”) pursuant to which the Placement Agent agreed to use its best efforts to arrange for the sale of up to an aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Shares”) in a registered direct offering (the “Offering”).

The Preferred Shares offered pursuant to the Offering were registered under a registration statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-184625), which the Securities and Exchange Commission declared effective on January 16, 2013.

Between January 16, 2013 and February 4, 2013, the Company entered into separate subscription agreements with certain investors in connection with the Offering, pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of Preferred Stock for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $12 million. Pursuant to the Certificate of Designation of the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on January 11, 2013 (the “Certificate of Designation”), each share of Preferred Stock is convertible into two shares of common stock, subject to adjustment.

As of the date of this report, 1,176,125 Series D shares have been converted into 2,352,250 shares of the Company’s common stock and 323,875 shares of Series D preferred stock remain outstanding.

Common Stock Issuances

In March 2013 the Company issued 142,282 shares of common stock pursuant to the ratchet provisions in the July 2012 securities purchase agreement which are valued at $853,692.

In March 2013 the Company issued an aggregate 741,017 shares of common stock pursuant consulting agreements valued at approximately $6,297,694.

In March 2013 the Company issued an aggregate 43,137 shares of common stock pursuant the vesting of stock awards valued at $294,167.

Private Placement of Common Stock

On March 26, 2013, the Company entered into subscription agreements with non-affiliated accredited investors for the issuance of 705,882 shares of common stock pursuant to exemptions from registration under federal and state securities laws. The shares of common stock were sold for $8.50 per share. The gross proceeds to the Company of $6.0 million were reduced by commissions and issuance costs of $115,000.

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(December 31, 2012 and 2011)

An unaudited pro-forma balance sheet showing the effect of these capital raises is shown below:

  December 31,
2012
  Total
Adjustment
(unaudited)
  Pro Forma
(unaudited)
 
Assets            
Assets:            
Cash $-  $6,296,669  $6,296,669 
Current assets  4,949,881   -   4,949,881 
Non-current assets  1,816,846   -   1,816,846 
Total assets $6,766,727  $6,296,669  $13,063,396 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit            
Liabilities:            
Current liabilities $16,520,456  $(8,238,165) $8,282,291 
Non-current liabilities  4,523   -   4,523 
Total Liabilities $16,524,979  $(8,238,165) $8,286,814 
Stockholders’ Deficit:            
Series A, Convertible Preferred Stock  -   -   - 
Series B, Preferred Stock  -   -   - 
Series C, Convertible Preferred Stock  -   -   - 
Series D, Convertible Preferred Stock  -   324   324 
Common Stock  2,778   2,972   5,750 
Treasury Stock, at cost  (460,978)  -   (460,978)
Additional paid-in capital  54,817,341   16,698,755   71,516,096 
Accumulated deficit  (64,109,476)  (2,167,217)  (66,276,693)
Accumulated other comprehensive income  (7,917)  -   (7,917)
Total Stockholders’ Deficit  (9,758,252)  14,534,834   4,776,582 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit $6,766,727  $6,296,669  $13,063,396 

At March 29, 2013 the Company’s issued and diluted shares were as follows:

Shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 20122,747,308
Series D Preferred Stock converted to Common Stock through March 29, 20132,352,250
Net shares issued through March 29, 20131,667,089
Shares issued and outstanding at March 29, 20136,776,647
Series D Preferred Stock not yet converted647,750
Shares awaiting authorization for issuance307,506
Unvested executive stock awards86,275
Fully Diluted as of March 29, 20137,818,17831, 2021 and December 31, 2021, respectively from the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021. These revisions correct certain typographical errors.

Repurchase of Shares of Common Stock Pursuant to Settlement Agreement

On January 31, 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with an investor regarding a dispute with registration of certain shares of common stock. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the Company repurchased 18,824 shares of common stock in exchange for $210,000.

MusclePharmCorporation and Subsidiary

Consolidated Balance Sheets

  March 31, 2013  December 31, 2012 
  (unaudited)    
Assets        
Current Assets:        
Cash $8,482,927  $- 
Cash – restricted  -   9,148 
Accounts receivable – net  8,028,406   3,302,344 
Inventory  419,418   257,975 
Prepaid giveaways  189,795   358,800 
Prepaid stock compensation  1,551,580   44,748 
Prepaid sponsorship fees  104,998   6,249 
Deferred equity costs  -   698,500 
Other assets  205,043   272,117 
Total current assets  18,982,167   4,949,881 
Property and equipment – net  1,409,596   1,356,364 
Debt issue costs – net  -   335,433 
Other assets  145,494   125,049 
Total assets $20,537,257  $6,766,727 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity        
Current Liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $7,712,924  $11,721,205 
Customer deposits  266,056   336,211 
Debt – net  76,671   4,463,040 
Derivative liabilities  5,253,774   - 
Total current liabilities  13,309,425   16,520,456 
Long Term Liabilities:        
Debt – net  506   4,523 
Total Liabilities  13,309,931   16,524,979 
Commitments and Contingencies        
Stockholders’ Equity:        
Series A, Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding  -   - 
Series B, Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value; 51 shares authorized, issued and outstanding  -   - 
Series C, Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value; 500 shares authorized, 190 and zero issued and outstanding  -   - 
Series D, Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value; 1,600,000 shares authorized, 1,500,000 and none issued and 323,875 and none outstanding  324   - 
Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 6,823,921 and 2,778,404 issued and 6,774,000 and 2,747,308 outstanding  6,824   2,778 
Treasury Stock, at cost; 49,921 and 31,096 shares  (564,515)  (460,978)
Additional paid-in capital  79,262,218   54,817,341 
Accumulated deficit  (71,471,457)  (64,109,476)
Accumulated other comprehensive income  (6,068)  (7,917)
Total Stockholders’ Equity  7,227,326   (9,758,252)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $20,537,257  $6,766,727 

SeeThe accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-31F-39

 

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(unaudited)(In thousands, except share and per share data)

  Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
  2013  2012 
Sales - gross $24,924,036  $19,302,769 
Discounts and sales allowances  (2,362,869)  (2,742,089)
Sales - net  22,561,167   16,560,680 
Cost of sales  14,396,406   12,895,162 
Gross profit  8,164,761   3,665,518 
General and administrative expenses  8,886,241   4,392,811 
Loss from operations  (721,480)  (727,293)
Other income (expense)        
Derivative (expense) income  (96,913)  (1,456,910)
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  (6,044,643)  (8,357,171)
Gain (loss) on settlement of accounts payable, debt and conversion of Series C preferred stock  276,985   (2,941,826)
Interest (expense) income  (780,320)  (2,570,516)
Foreign currency transaction gain  (5,610)  - 
Other income  10,000   18,423 
Total other income (expense) - net  (6,640,501)  (15,308,000)
Net income (loss)  (7,361,981)  (16,035,293)
Other comprehensive income        
Net change in Foreign currency translation  (6,068)  - 
Total other comprehensive income (loss)  (6,068)  - 
Total comprehensive income (loss) $(7,368,049) $(16,035,293)
Net income (loss) per share available to common stockholders - basic and diluted $(1.78) $(11.23)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period – basic and diluted  4,128,679   1,428,024 
   2022   2021 
  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2022  2021 
Revenue, net $13,101  $13,121 
Cost of revenue  11,592   9,432 
Gross profit  1,509   3,689 
Operating expenses:        
Selling and promotion  1,160   1,149 
General and administrative  2,829   2,268 
Impairment of operating lease right-of-use assets        
Total operating expenses  3,989   3,417 
Income (loss) from operations  (2,480)  272 
Other (expense) income:        
Gain on settlements  12   200 
Loss on settlement of obligations        
Gain on settlement of payables        
Interest expense  (3,821)  (510)
Other (expense) income, net  (12)  132 
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes  (6,301)  94 
Benefit for income taxes        
Net income (loss) $(6,301) $94 
Net income (loss) per share, basic $(0.19) $0.00 
Net income (loss) per share, diluted $(0.19) $0.00 
Weighted average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share, basic  33,386,200   33,119,549 
Weighted average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share, diluted  33,386,200   45,492,620 

SeeThe accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-40

MusclePharm Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit

(In thousands, except share and Subsidiaryper share data)

                             
  Common Stock  Treasury Stock  Additional Paid-In  Accumulated Other Comprehensive    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Loss  Total 
Balance at December 31, 2020  33,105,284   32   875,621   (10,039)  178,261   (192,673)  (24,419)
Net income                      94   94 
Stock-based compensation for issuance and amortization of restricted stock awards to employees, executives, and directors  280,916   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Balance at March 31, 2021  33,386,200   32   875,621   (10,039)  178,261   (192,579)  (24,325)

                             
  Common Stock  Treasury Stock  Additional Paid-In  Accumulated Other Comprehensive    
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Loss  Total 
Balance at December 31, 2021  33,386,200   32   875,621   (10,039)  183,355   (205,539)  (32,191)
Net loss                      (6,301)  (6,301)
Net income (loss)                      (6,301)  (6,301)
Stock-based compensation  -   -   -   -   437   -   437 
Balance at March 31, 2022  33,386,200   32   875,621   (10,039)  183,792   (211,840)  (38,055)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-41

MusclePharm Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)(In thousands)

  Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
  2013  2012 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:        
Net loss $(7,361,981) $(16,035,293)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:        
Depreciation  161,341   89,655 
Amortization of prepaid stock and deferred compensation  158,231   159,354 
Amortization of debt discount  -   2,357,490 
Amortization of debt issue costs  335,433   97,612 
(Gain) loss on settlement of accounts payable, debt and conversion of Series C preferred stock  (276,985)  2,941,826 
Derivative expense  96,913   1,456,910 
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities  6,044,643   8,357,171 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
(Increase) decrease in:        
Restricted cash balance  9,148   - 
Accounts receivable  (4,449,077)  (1,972,773)
Prepaid and other  664,926   94,223 
Inventory  9,016   - 
Increase (decrease) in:        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  1,471,578   3,456,644 
Customer deposits  (70,155)  420,556 
Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Operating Activities  (3,206,969)  1,423,375 
         
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:        
Purchase of property and equipment  (216,267)  (305,781)
Disposal of property and equipment  1,694   - 
Purchase of trademark  (20,000)  - 
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities  (234,573)  (305,781)
         
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:        
Proceeds from issuance of debt  -   2,842,950 
Debt issue costs  -   (30,000)
Repayment of debt  (4,390,386)  (3,346,433)
Repurchase of common stock (treasury stock)  (103,537)  (230,400)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock  12,000,000   - 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants  5,977,499   285,760 
Common stock issuance costs  (1,560,956)  - 
Net Cash (Used In) Provided by Financing Activities  11,922,620   (478,123)
         
Cash Flows From Equity Activities:        
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents  1,849   - 
Net Cash Provided by Equity Activities  1,849   - 
         
Net increase in cash  8,482,927   639,471 
         
Cash at beginning of period  -   659,764 
         
Cash at end of period $8,482,927  $1,299,235 
         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:        
Cash paid for interest $501,165  $101,706 
Cash paid for taxes $-  $- 
         
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:        
Stock issued for future services - third parties $1,628,085  $- 
Warrants issued in conjunction with equity issuances $8,175,459  $- 
Debt discount recorded on convertible and unsecured debt accounted for as a derivative liability $-  $2,347,672 
Stock issued to settle accounts payable and accrued expenses– third parties $5,364,947  $- 
Conversion of convertible debt and accrued interest for common stock $-  $1,069,402 
Stock issued to settle accrued executive compensation $-  $4,667,764 
Stock issued for executive and board compensation $114,912  $- 
Reclassification of derivative liability to additional paid in capital $-  $4,124,387 
Stock issued to settle accrued liabilities $-  $135,000 
   2022   2021 
  For the Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2022  2021 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES        
Net income/(loss) $(6,301) $94 
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment  1   4 
Amortization of intangible assets  35   80 
Bad debt expense  

(355

)  (11)
Gain on disposal of property and equipment        
Gain on settlement of payables        
Provision for inventory write down     86 
Stock-based compensation  437    
Stock issued to nonemployees        
Impairment of operating lease right-of-use assets        
Amortization of debt issue cost  419    
OID Interest  568    
Amortization of debt discount  2,196    
Gain on extinguishment of Paycheck Protection Program Loan        
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable, net  (2,534)  1,278 
Inventory  855   (406)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (6)  527 
Operating lease assets and liabilities  (41)  87 
Accounts payable  897   (1,641)
Other long-term liabilities  (465)   
Accrued and other liabilities  712    
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities  (3,582)  98 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
Purchase of property and equipment     (4)
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities     (4)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Proceeds from line of credit     1,061 
Payments on lines of credit     (100)
Proceeds from secured borrowing arrangement, net of reserves  6,293   11,423 
Payments to secured borrowing arrangement, net of fees  (6,147)  (13,781)
Proceeds from revolving line of credit, related party  7,366    
Payments on revolving line of credit, related party  (4,619)   
Repayment of notes payable     (108)
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities  2,893   (1,505)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (689)  (1,411)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period  1,223   2,003 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $534  $592 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:        
Cash paid for interest $3,467  $101 

SeeThe accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-33F-42

 

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (1)

(dollars in thousands, unless otherwise indicated)

Note 1. Description of Business

Description of Business

MusclePharm Corporation, together with its subsidiaries (the “Company” or “MusclePharm”) is a scientifically-driven, performance lifestyle company that develops, markets and distributes branded sports nutrition products and nutritional supplements that are manufactured by the Company’s contract manufacturers. The Company’s portfolio of recognized brands, including MusclePharm, FitMiss and MP Combat Energy is marketed and sold globally. As of March 31, 2013)2022, the Company had the following wholly-owned subsidiary which did not have any operations or assets as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2022: MusclePharm Canada Enterprises Corp.

(Unaudited)

Note 1: NatureIn 2021, the Company announced its entrance into the functional energy space in collaboration with former Rockstar Energy executives. The Company launched three flavors of OperationsMP Combat Energy in September 2021 for domestic distribution and Basisthree additional flavors for international distribution. The Company believes the launch of Presentation

Nature of Operations

MusclePharm Corporation (the “Company”, “we”, “our”, or “MusclePharm”), was incorporatedits new energy products, reductions in operating costs and continued focus on gross profit and revenue growth will allow it to ultimately achieve sustained profitability. However, the Company can give no assurances that this will occur, especially with the cost to launch new energy products along with the recent increase in the statecost of Nevadaprotein, which may have a material impact on August 4, 2006 under the name ToneCompany’s profitability. Additionally, the Company’s profitability may be materially impacted by the ability of the Company’s contract manufacturers to meet customers’ demands. Although, the Company believes entering the functional energy space will help to increase sales and gross margin, and reduce exposure to commodity prices, the Company can give no assurances that this will occur. To manage cash flow, the Company has entered into multiple financing arrangements. The entry into the Energy Drink business has created a second segment, which is presented in Twenty fordetail in Note 12.

Information About Our Segments

We are engaged in global sales of products that fall into two operating segments: Protein Products and Energy Drinks. Information regarding our operating segments and geographic and product information is contained in Note 12 to these consolidated financial statements.

Going Concern

The Company has historically incurred significant losses and experienced negative cash flows since inception. As of March 31, 2022, the purposeCompany had cash of engaging$0.5million, a working capital deficit of $36.3million, a stockholders’ deficit of $38.1 million and an accumulated deficit of $211.8 million resulting from recurring losses from operations. As a result of a history of losses and financial condition, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon it generating profits in the future and/or obtaining the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay liabilities arising from normal business of providing personal fitness training using isometric techniques.operations when they come due. The Company is headquarteredevaluating different strategies to obtain financing to fund its operations to cover expenses and focus on achieving a level of revenue adequate to support its current cost structure. Financing strategies may include, but are not limited to, issuances of capital stock, debt borrowings, partnerships and/or collaborations.

The Company has been focused on cost containment and improving gross margins by focusing on customers with higher margins, reducing product discounts and promotional activity, along with reducing the number of SKU’s and negotiating improved pricing for raw materials. In addition, the Company has worked to negotiate lower production costs with its contract manufacturers. Although these steps improved gross margins through the first quarter of 2022, with the recent further increases in Denver, Colorado.commodity prices, primarily protein, the Company’s gross margins have been impacted and will continue to be impacted unless commodity prices return the same levels that were seen in 2021. The Company expects overall margins to improve as we ramp up energy sales with stronger gross margins in the energy drink segment.

F-43

 

MusclePharm currently manufactures

COVID-19

The Company’s results of operations are affected by economic conditions, including macroeconomic conditions and levels of business confidence. There continues to be significant volatility and economic uncertainty in many markets and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic contributes to that level of volatility and uncertainty and has created economic disruption. The Company is actively managing its business to respond to the impact. There were no adjustments recorded in the financial statements that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

The ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s operations is unknown and will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak, new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, and any additional preventative and protective actions that governments, or the Company, may direct, which may result in an extended period of continued business disruption, reduced customer traffic and reduced operations. Any resulting financial impact cannot be reasonably estimated at this time but may have a wide-ranging varietymaterial impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of high-quality sports nutrition products.operations. Management continues to monitor the business environment for any significant changes that could impact the Company’s operations. The Company has taken proactive steps to manage costs and discretionary spending, such as remote working and reducing facility related expense.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), as amended for interim financial information.information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, these statements do not include all the information and notes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company’s management believes the unaudited interim consolidated financial informationstatements include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position as of DecemberMarch 31, 2012 is derived from2022, results of operations and cash flows for the audited financial statements presented inthree months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021. The results of operations for the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kthree ended March 31, 2022 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ended December 31, 2012. The2022.

These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K which contains the audited financial statements and notes thereto, together with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,as amended for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

Certain information or footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance2021, filed with GAAP have been condensed or omitted, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. It is management’s opinion, however, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation. The interim results for the three months ended March 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results for the full fiscal year.on May 4, 2022.

Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MusclePharm Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary MusclePharm Canada Enterprises Corp (“MusclePharm Canada”). MusclePharm Canada began operations in April of 2012. All intercompany accounts and transactions between MusclePharm Corporation and MusclePharm Canada have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities atdisclosed in the date of theconsolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

Makingaccompanying notes. Such estimates requires managementinclude, but are not limited to, exercise significant judgment. It is reasonably possible that the estimate of the effect of a condition, situation or set of circumstances that existed at the date of the financial statements, which management considered in formulating its estimate could change in the near term due to one or more future non-conforming events. Accordingly, the actual results could differ significantly from estimates.

Risks and Uncertainties

The Company operates in an industry that is subject to rapid change and intense competition. The Company’s operations will be subject to significant risk and uncertainties including financial, operational, technological, regulatory, industry adverse publicity and other risks, including the potential risk of business failure.

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(March 31, 2013)

(Unaudited)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less and money market accounts to be cash equivalents. At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, the Company had no cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable represents trade obligations from customers that are subject to normal trade collection terms. The accounts receivable are sent directly to the Company’s third party manufacturer and netted with any outstanding liabilities to the manufacturer. Liabilities to the manufacturer totaled $4,196,224 at March 31, 2013 and are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The Company periodically evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable and considers the need to establish an allowance for doubtful accounts, based upon historical collection experiencerevenue discounts and specific customer information. Accordingly,allowances, the actual amounts could vary fromvaluation of inventory, the recorded allowances. There is also a review of customer discounts at the period end and an accrual made for discounts earned but not yet received by quarter end.

The Company does not charge interest on past due receivables. Receivables are determined to be past due based on the payment termscalculation of the original invoices. Accounts receivable consistedCompany’s effective tax rate and deferred tax assets, valuation of stock based compensation, warrants, likelihood and range of possible losses on contingencies and present value of lease liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Disaggregation of Revenue

The following shows the following atdisaggregation of revenue by distribution channel for the three months ended March 31, 20132022 and December 31, 2012:2021 (in thousands).

  As of
March 31, 2013
  As of
December 31, 2012
 
Accounts receivable $8,964,808  $4,416,193 
Less: allowance for discounts  (816,693)  (1,088,720)
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts  (119,709)  (25,129)
Accounts receivable – net $8,028,406  $3,302,344 

At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had the following concentrationsSchedule of accounts receivable with significant customers:

Customer As of March 31, 2013  As of December 31, 2012 
A  20%  20%
B  12%  6%
C  11%  24%

Inventory

Inventory is valued at the lowerDisaggregation of cost or market value. Product-related inventories are primarily maintained using the average cost method.Revenue

  For the Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2022  % of Total  2021  % of Total 
Distribution Channel                
Specialty $3,383   26% $6,795   52%
International  733   6%  3,847   29%
FDM  8,985   68%  2,479   19%
Total $13,101   100% $13,121   100%

Prepaid Giveaways

Prepaid giveaways represent non-inventory sample items which are given away to aid in promotion of the brand.

Prepaid Sponsorship Fees

Prepaid sponsorship fees represents fees paid in connection with future advertising to be received.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated to their estimated residual value over their estimated useful lives. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the assets and related accumulated depreciation are relieved from the accounts and the resulting gains or losses are included in operating income in the statements of operations. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method for all property and equipment.

F-35F-44

 

MusclePharm Corporation

Concentrations

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and Subsidiary

Notesaccounts receivable. The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The cash balance at times may exceed federally insured limits. Management believes the financial risk associated with these balances is minimal and has not experienced any losses to Consolidated Financial Statements

(March 31, 2013)

(Unaudited)

Website Development Costs

Costs incurred in the planning stage of a websitedate. Significant customers and vendors are expensed, while costs incurred in the development stage are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful lifethose that represent more than 10% of the asset.Company’s net revenue or accounts receivable for each period presented.

Long-Lived Assets

The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances, such as service discontinuance or technological obsolescence, indicate that the carrying amount of the long-lived asset may not be recoverable. When such events occur, the Company compares the carrying amount of the asset to the undiscounted expected future cash flows related to the asset. If the comparison indicates that impairment is present, the amount of the impairment is calculated as the difference between the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the asset. If a readily determinable market price does not exist, fair value is estimated using discounted expected cash flows attributable to the asset. During the three months ended March 31, 20132022, we had three customers who individually accounted for 59%, 13%, and 2012, the Company recorded no impairment expense.

Fair Value 12% of Financial Instruments

The Company measures assetsour net revenue, and liabilities at fair value based on an expected exit price which represents the amounttwo customers that would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability, as the case may be, in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value may be based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The authoritative guidance on fair value measurements contains a consistent frameworkindividually accounted for measuring fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis whereby inputs, used in valuation techniques, are assigned a hierarchical level.

The following are the hierarchical levels of inputs to measure fair value:

·Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

·Level 2: Inputs reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

·Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s assumptions incorporated in valuation techniques used to determine fair value. These assumptions are required to be consistent with market participant assumptions that are reasonably available.

The following are the major categories of liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2013 59% and December 31, 2012, using quoted prices in active markets for identical liabilities (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

  As of March 31, 2013  As of December 31, 2012 
         
Derivative liabilities (Level 2) $5,253,774  $- 

The Company’s financial instruments consisted primarily 17% of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and debt. The Company’s debt approximates fair value based upon current borrowing rates available to the Company for debt with similar maturities. The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments generally approximated their fair values as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Revenue Recognition

The Company records revenue when all of the following have occurred: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) product has been shipped or delivered, (3) the sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.

Depending on individual customer agreements, sales are recognized either upon shipment of products to customers or upon delivery. For all of our Canadian sales, which represent 3% of total sales, recognition occurs upon shipment, and for one of our largest domestic customers (See customer “C” below under concentrations), which represents 8% of our total revenue forreceivable. During the three months ended March 201331, 2021, we had three customers who individually accounted for 28%, 17% and 14% of our net revenue, is recognized upon delivery.and two customers that individually accounted for 32% and 21% of accounts receivable.

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(March 31, 2013)

(Unaudited)

The Company uses a limited number of non-affiliated suppliers for contract manufacturing its products. The Company has determined that advertising related credits thatquality control and manufacturing agreements in place with its primary manufacturers to ensure consistency in production and quality. The agreements ensure products are granted to customers fall within the guidance of ASC No. 605-50-55 (“Revenue Recognition” – Customer Payments and Incentives – Implementation Guidance and Illustrations). The guidance indicates that, absent evidence of benefitmanufactured to the vendor, appropriate treatment requires netting these typesCompany’s specifications and the contract manufacturers will bear the costs of payments against revenuesrecalled products due to defective manufacturing. During the three months ended March 31, 2022, the Company had four vendors who individually accounted for 17%, 12%, 12%, and not expensing as advertising expense.11% of net purchases, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2021, the Company had three vendors who individually accounted for 32%, 21% and 21% of net purchases.

The Company records store support, giveaways, sales allowanceshas a geographic concentration in the United States, with 94% and discounts as a direct reduction71% of sales.

Salesrevenue from domestic customers during the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. International customers, primarily in Canada and Asia, comprised 6% and 29% for the three months ended March 31, 20132022 and 2012 were2021, respectively.

Segments

Historically, the Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. As such, the Company has had two reporting segments and operating unit structures. During the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company introduced a functional energy beverages line under the MusclePharm and FitMiss brands, so the CODM now reviews financial information and makes resource and opportunity decisions on a disaggregated basis with the functional energy drink business separate from protein products.

Litigation Estimates and Accruals

In the normal course of business or otherwise, the Company may become involved in legal proceedings. The Company will accrue a liability for such matters when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When only a range of possible loss can be established, the most probable amount in the range is accrued. If no amount within this range is a better estimate than any other amount within the range, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. The accrual for a litigation loss contingency might include, for example, estimates of potential damages, outside legal fees and other directly related costs expected to be incurred. The Company provides disclosures for material contingencies when there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may be incurred. In assessing whether a loss is a reasonable possibility, the Company may consider the following factors, among others: the nature of the litigation, claim or assessment, available information, opinions or views of legal counsel and other advisors, and the experience gained from similar cases.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Income tax expense includes the current tax liability from operations and the change in deferred income taxes during the year. Interest income, interest expense and penalties associated with income taxes are reflected in (Benefit) provision for income taxes on the consolidated statements of operations. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

A valuation allowance is required to be established unless management determines that it is more likely than not that the Company will ultimately realize the tax benefit associated with a deferred tax asset. The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not to be sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely to be realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs.

F-45

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”), which requires the measurement of all expected credit losses of financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. ASU 2016-13 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2022, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this ASU may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (“ASU 2020-04”). The amendments in this ASU apply only to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate that is expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The amendments in this update provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The expedients and exceptions provided by the amendments do not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022, except for hedging relationships existing as follows:

  Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2013  2012 
Sales $24,924,036  $19,302,769 
         
Discounts  (2,362,869)  (2,742,089)
         
Sales - Net $22,561,167  $16,560,680 

of December 31, 2022, that an entity has elected certain optional expedients for and that are retained through the end of the hedging relationship. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020, through December 31, 2022. The Company has not modified any material contracts due to reference rate reform. The Company will continue to evaluate the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements for all future transactions affected by reference rate reform during the time permitted.

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40). The ASU eliminates the beneficial conversion and cash conversion accounting models for convertible instruments. It also amends the accounting for certain contracts in an informal seven day rightentity’s own equity that are currently accounted for as derivatives because of returnspecific settlement provisions. In addition, the new guidance modifies how particular convertible instruments and certain contracts that may be settled in cash or shares impact the diluted EPS computation. This guidance is effective for products.fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, but not earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The FASB also specified that an entity should adopt the guidance as of the beginning of its annual fiscal year and is not permitted to adopt the guidance in an interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this ASU may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-04, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments (Subtopic 470-50), Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), and Derivatives and Hedging-Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40). The ASU addresses issuer’s accounting for certain modifications or exchanges of freestanding equity-classified written call options. This amendment is effective for all entities, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods within those fiscal years. There were nominal returnshas not been a significant impact from the adoption of this ASU on the consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statement presentation, including classification of certain operating expenses.

Note 3. Inventory

Inventory consists of finished goods and raw materials used to manufacture the Company’s products by one of our contract manufacturers for the three months ended March 31, 20132022 and 2012.2021. The Company records charges for obsolete and slow-moving inventory based on the age of the product as determined by the expiration date or otherwise determined to be obsolete. Products within one year of their expiration dates are considered for write-off purposes. Inventory write-downs, once established, are not reversed as they establish a new cost basis for the inventory. Historically, the Company has had minimal returns with established customers. The Company accounts for its inventory on a First-in First-out basis.

F-46

 

The components of inventory as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 were as follows (in thousands):

Schedule of Inventory

  March 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Raw Materials $746  $694 
Finished Goods  229   1,144 
Inventory  975   1,838 
Less: inventory writedown     (8)
Inventory $975  $1,830 

Note 4. Accrued and Other Liabilities

As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company’s accrued and other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

Schedule of Accrued and Other Liabilities

  March 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Accrued professional fees $342  $236 
Accrued interest  1,151   797 
Accrued payroll and bonus  702   695 
Settlements — short term (Nutrablend and 4Excelsior)  2,102   2,104 
Accrued expenses — ThermoLife  1,364   1,364 
Accrued and other short-term liabilities  993   746 
Total accrued and other liabilities $6,654  $5,942 

Note 5. Interest Expense

For the three months ended March 31, 20132022 and 2012,March 31, 2021, interest expense consisted of the following:

Schedule of Interest Expenses

       
  For the Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2022  2021 
Interest expense, related party $(313) $(120)
Interest expense, other  (254)  (227)
Interest expense, secured borrowing arrangement  (71)  (163)
Amortization of debt issue cost associated with related warrants  (2,615)  - 
Amortization of debt issue cost - OID  (568)  - 
Total interest expense $(3,821) $(510)

Note 6. Other Long -Term Liabilities

As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 the Company’s other long-term liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

Schedule of Other Long-Term Liabilities

  As of March 31, 2022  As of December 31, 2021 
Settlements — long term (Nutrablend and 4Excelsior) $1,861  $2,326 
Total other long term liabilities $1,861  $2,326 

F-47

Note 7. Debt

As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company’s debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

Schedule of Debt

  March 31, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Senior notes payable $

7,798

  $5,035 

Debt issue costs, net

  

(60

)  (479)
Refinanced convertible note, related party  5,330   5,330 
Revolving line of credit, related party  2,747   - 
Obligations under secured borrowing arrangement  6,592   6,446 
Total current debt $22,407  $16,331 

Senior Notes Payable

On October 13, 2021, the Company hadentered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain institutional investors as purchasers (the “Investors”). Pursuant to the following concentrationsSecurities Purchase Agreement, the Company sold, and the Investors purchased, $8,197,674 million (the “Purchase Price”) in principal amount of revenuessenior notes (the “Senior Notes”) and warrants (the “Warrants”).

The Senior Notes were issued with significant customers:an original issue discount of 14%, bear no interest and mature after 6 months, on April 13, 2022. To secure its obligations thereunder and under the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company has granted a security interest over substantially all of its assets to the collateral agent for the benefit of the Investors, pursuant to a pledge and security agreement.

The maturity date of the Senior Notes was extended to May 28, 2022, on April 12, 2022. The maturity date of the Senior Notes also may be extended under other circumstances specified therein. Subsequent to the extension, interest accrued from April 13, 2022 at 18% per annum until the Senior Notes are paid in full. The Company is undertaking various initiatives to improve gross margins to become cash flow positive prior to the maturity of the Senior Notes. These initiatives include improving cost of goods sold on certain raw materials. There can be no assurance the Company will be able to successfully implement such initiatives on a timely basis or at all or that it otherwise will meet the conditions required to extend the Senior Notes. If the Company is unable to extend the Senior Notes or elects not to do so, the Company will be required to repay the Senior Notes through equity issuances, additional borrowings, cash flows from operations and/or other sources of liquidity.

F-48

 

  Three Months Ended March 31, 
Customer 2013  2012 
A  33%  38%
B  11%  11%
C  8%  18%

 

Licensing IncomeThe Warrants are exercisable for five (5) years to purchase 17,355,700 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at an exercise price of $0.78, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances described in the Warrants. The Warrants have a face value of $4.4 million which is recorded in Additional Paid-In Capital.

In conjunction with the private placement of Senior Notes and Royalty Revenue

On May 5, 2011,Warrants, each of the directors and officers of the Company grantedentered into lock-up agreements, which prohibited sales of the Common Stock until after April 11, 2022, subject to certain exceptions.

The issuance of the Senior Notes and Warrants was made in reliance on the exemption provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), for the offer and sale of securities not involving a public offering, and Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act. In accordance with ASC 470-20-25-2, proceeds from the sale of a debt instrument with stock purchase warrants (detachable call options) are allocated to the two elements based on the relative fair values of the debt instrument without the warrants and of the warrants themselves at time of issuance. The portion of the proceeds so allocated to the warrants shall be accounted for as additional paid-in capital. The remainder of the proceeds shall be allocated to the debt instrument portion of the transaction.

November 2020 Convertible Note, Related Party

On November 29, 2020, the Company entered into a refinancing agreement with Mr. Ryan Drexler, (the “November 2020 Refinancing”), in which the Company issued to Mr. Drexler a convertible secured promissory note (the November 2020 “Convertible Note”) in the original principal amount of $2.9 million, which amended and restated a convertible secured promissory note dated as of August 21, 2020. The $2.9 million November 2020 Convertible Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum. Unless earlier converted or repaid, all outstanding principal and any accrued but unpaid interest under the November 2020 Convertible Note shall be due and payable on July 1, 2021, however the Company and Mr. Drexler agreed to an exclusive indefinite licenseextension on August 13, 2021 until July 14, 2022. Any interest not paid when due shall be capitalized and added to market, manufacture, designthe principal amount of the November 2020 Convertible Note and sellbear interest on the applicable interest payment date along with all other unpaid principal, capitalized interest, and other capitalized obligations.

Mr. Drexler may, at any time, and from time to time, upon written notice to the Company, convert the outstanding principal and accrued interest into shares of Common Stock, at a conversion price of $0.23 per share. At the election of the Company, one-sixth of the interest may be paid in kind (“PIK Interest”) by adding such amount to the principal amount of the note, or through the issuance of shares of the Company’s existing apparel line.common stock to Mr. Drexler. The licenseePIK Interest is convertible to common stock at the closing price per share on the last business day of each calendar quarter. In no event will the conversion price of such PIK Interest be less than $0.10. The Company may prepay the Note by giving Mr. Drexler between 15-days’ and 60-days’ notice depending upon the specific circumstances, subject to Mr. Drexler’s conversion right.

The November 2020 Convertible Note contains customary restrictions on the ability of the Company to, among other things, grant liens or incur indebtedness other than certain obligations incurred in the ordinary course of business. The restrictions are also subject to certain additional qualifications and carveouts, as set forth in the November 2020 Convertible Note. The November 2020 Convertible Note is subordinated to certain other indebtedness of the Company held by Prestige Capital Corporation (“Prestige”) and the Senior Notes.

F-49

For the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, interest expense related to the related party convertible secured promissory note was $0.085 million and $0.085 million, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2022, no interest was paid in cash to Mr. Drexler; during the three months ended March 31, 2021 $0.085 million of interest was paid in cash to Mr. Drexler.

August 2021 Convertible Note, Related Party

On October 15, 2020, the Company entered into a secured revolving promissory note (the “Revolving Note”) with Mr. Ryan Drexler. Under the terms of the Revolving Note, the Company can borrow up to $3.0 million. The Revolving Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum. The funds were used for the purchase of whey protein and other general corporate purposes. Both the outstanding principal, if any, and all accrued interest under the Revolving Note were due on March 31, 2021, which was not paid.

On August 13, 2021, the Company issued to Ryan Drexler (the “Holder”) a convertible secured promissory note (the “August 2021 Convertible Note”) in the original principal amount of $2.5 million, replacing the Revolving Note.

The August 2021 Convertible Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum. Interest payments are due on the last day of each calendar quarter. At the Company’s option (as determined by its independent directors), the Company may repay up to one sixth of any interest payment by either adding such amount to the principal amount of the August 2021 Convertible Note or by converting such interest amount into an initial feeequivalent amount of $250,000the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”). Any interest not paid when due shall be capitalized and added to the principal amount of the August 2021 Convertible Note and bear interest on the applicable interest payment date along with all other unpaid principal, capitalized interest, and other capitalized obligations. Both the principal and any accrued but unpaid interest under the August 2021 Convertible Note will be due on July 14, 2022, unless converted or repaid earlier.

The Holder may, at any time, and from time to time, upon written notice to the Company, convert the outstanding principal and accrued interest into shares of Common Stock, at a conversion price equal to the closing price of the common stock on October 15, 2021. The Company may prepay the August 2021 Convertible Note by giving the Holder between 15 and 60 days’ notice depending upon the specific circumstances, subject to the Holder’s conversion right.

The August 2021 Convertible Note contains customary events of default, including, among others, the failure by the Company to make a payment of principal or interest when due. Following an event of default, at the option of the Holder and upon written notice to the Company, or automatically under certain circumstances, all outstanding principal and accrued interest will become due and payable. The August 2021 Convertible Note also contains customary restrictions on the ability of the Company to, among other things, grant liens or incur indebtedness other than certain obligations incurred in June 2011,the ordinary course of business. The restrictions are also subject to certain additional qualifications and carveouts, as set forth in the August 2021 Convertible Note. The August 2021 Convertible Note is subordinated to certain other indebtedness of the Company held by Prestige Corporation (“Prestige”) and the Senior Notes.

F-50

For the three months ended March 31, 2022, interest expense related to the related party convertible secured promissory note was $0.122 million and there was 0 interest expense related to this note for the three months ended March 31, 2021. During the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 0 interest was paid in cash to Mr. Drexler.

Revolving Line of Credit, Related Party

On March 8, 2022, the Company entered into an Unsecured Revolving Promissory Note (the “Note”) with the Mr. Ryan Drexler. Under the terms of the Note, proceeds may be used solely to finance the production of orders from its largest customer or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries. The Note does not contain a cap on borrowings thereunder. However, further advances under the Note are at the discretion of the Lender. Outstanding balances under the Note accrue interest at the rate of 18% per annum. Prior to maturity, the Company generally may pay down principal balances and re-borrow under the Note, subject to the discretion of the Lender to advance funds under the Note. The Note contains customary events of default and acceleration provisions.

The Note is subordinate to the 14% Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Notes previously issued by the Company. Under the terms of the First Amendment to Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2022, between the Company, Ryan Drexler and Empery Tax Efficient, LP (the “Amendment”), principal but not interest due under the Note generally may be repaid out of payments received by the Company in respect of accounts receivable financed pursuant to the Note.

The related party revolving line of credit balance as of March 31, 2022 was $2.7 million and was 0 on at March 31, 2021.

For the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 total related party debt was $8.1 million and $4.6 million, respectively.

For the three months ended March 31, 2022, interest expense related to the revolving line of credit, related party was $0.106 million.

Obligations Under Secured Borrowing Arrangement

In January 2016, the Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Purchase and Sale Agreement”) with Prestige, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell and assign, and Prestige agreed to buy and accept, certain accounts receivable owed to the Company (“Accounts”). Under the terms of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, upon the receipt and acceptance of each assignment of Accounts, Prestige will pay the Company 80% of the net face amount of the assigned Accounts, up to a 10% net royaltymaximum total borrowing of $12.5 million subject to sufficient amounts of accounts receivable to secure the loan. The remaining 20% will be paid to the Company upon collection of the assigned Accounts, less any chargebacks (including chargebacks for any customer amounts that remain outstanding for over 90 days), disputes, or other amounts due to Prestige. Prestige’s purchase of the assigned Accounts from the Company will be at a discount fee which varies from 0.7% to 4%, based on its net incomethe number of days outstanding from the assignment of Accounts to collection of the assigned Accounts. In addition, the Company granted Prestige a continuing security interest in and first priority lien upon all accounts receivable, inventory, fixed assets, general intangibles, and other assets. Prestige will have no recourse against the Company if payments are not made due to the insolvency of an account debtor within 90 days of invoice date, with the exception of international and certain domestic customers. On April 10, 2019, the Company and Prestige amended the terms of the agreement. The agreement was extended until April 1, 2020 and automatically renews for one (1) year periods unless either party receives written notice of cancellation from the other, at minimum, thirty (30) days prior to the endexpiration date thereafter.

On June 14, 2021, Prestige advanced the Company $1.0 million with a six-month term, 15% interest rate and 2% accommodation fee.

On July 26, 2021, Prestige advanced the Company $1.0 million with a six-month term and a 15% interest rate. In addition, there was an accommodation fee equal to 1% of each fiscal year. Tothe amount advanced plus 18,750 stock options.

On October 12, 2021, the June 14, 2021 and July 26, 2021 the total Prestige advance $2.0 million was extended to the date no royalty revenueof the termination of the senior secured note offering, which is in April 2022, and was extended to May 28 2022.

For the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company assigned Prestige accounts with an aggregate face amount of approximately $6.3 million and $11.4 million, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company made payments to Prestige in the amounts of $6.1 million and $13.8 million, respectively, in cash. As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, we had outstanding borrowings of approximately $6.6 million and $6.4 million, respectively.

F-51

Paycheck Protection Program Loan

Due to economic uncertainty as a result of the ongoing pandemic (“COVID-19”), on May 14, 2020, the Company received an aggregate principal amount of $964,910 pursuant to the borrowing arrangement (“Note”) with Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC (“HSBF”) and agreed to pay the principal amount plus interest at a 1% fixed interest rate per year, on the unpaid principal balance. The Note includes forgiveness provisions in accordance with the requirements of the Paycheck Protection Program, Section 1106 of the CARES Act.

The Note was expected to mature on May 16, 2025. Payments were due by November 16, 2020 (the “Deferment Period”) and interest was accrued during the Deferment Period. However, the Flexibility Act, which was signed into law on June 5, 2020, extended the Deferment Period to the date that the forgiven amount is remitted by the United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”) to HSBF.

On October 25, 2021, the Company received a letter from HSBF indicating the Company’s SBA PPP loan has been earnedforgiven in full by HSBF and was recorded as a $964,910 gain on forgiveness of debt located in other income-loan forgiveness.

Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies

Contingencies

In the normal course of business or otherwise, the Company may become involved in legal proceedings. The Company will accrue a liability for such matters when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When only a range of possible loss can be established, the most probable amount in the range is accrued. If no amount within this range is a better estimate than any other amount within the range, the minimum amount in the range is accrued. The accrual for a litigation loss contingency might include, for example, estimates of potential damages, outside legal fees and other directly related costs expected to be incurred. The Company provides disclosures for material contingencies when there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may be incurred. In assessing whether a loss is a reasonable possibility, the Company may consider the following factors, among others: the nature of the litigation, claim or assessment, available information, opinions or views of legal counsel and other advisors, and the experience gained from similar cases. As of December 31, 2021, the Company was involved in the following material legal proceedings described below:

White Winston Select Asset Fund Series MP-18, LLC et al., v MusclePharm Corp., et al., (Nev. Dist. Ct.; Cal. Superior Court; Colorado Dist. Ct.; Mass. Super. Ct.)

On August 21, 2018, White Winston Select Asset Fund Series MP-18, LLC and White Winston Select Asset Fund, LLC (together “White Winston”) initiated a derivative action against the Company and its directors (the “director defendants”). White Winston alleges that the director defendants breached their fiduciary duties by improperly approving the refinancing of three promissory notes issued by the Company.

CostCompany to Mr. Drexler (the “Amended Note”) in exchange for $18.0 million in loans. White Winston alleges that this refinancing improperly diluted their economic and voting power and constituted an improper distribution in violation of Sales

CostNevada law. In its complaint, White Winston sought the appointment of sales represents costs directly relateda receiver over the Company, a permanent injunction against the exercise of Mr. Drexler’s conversion right under the Amended Note, and other unspecified monetary damages. On September 13, 2018, White Winston filed an amended complaint, which added a former executive of the Company, as a plaintiff (together with White Winston, the “White Winston Plaintiffs”). On December 9, 2019, the White Winston Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint, in which they added allegations relating to the production, manufacturing and freightresignation of the Company’s products.auditor, Plante & Moran PLLC (“Plante Moran”). the Company has moved to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. That motion has not yet been fully briefed.

ShippingAlong with its complaint, White Winston also filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and Handlingpreliminary injunction enjoining the exercise of Mr. Drexler’s conversion right under the Amended Note. On August 23, 2018, the Nevada district court issued an ex parte TRO. On September 14, 2018, the court let the TRO expire and denied White Winston’s request for a preliminary injunction, finding, among other things, that White Winston did not show a likelihood of success on the merits of the underlying action and failed to establish irreparable harm. Following the court’s decision, the Company filed a motion seeking to recoup the legal fees and costs it incurred in responding to the preliminary injunction motion. On October 31, 2019, the court awarded the Company $56,000 in fees and costs.

Until March 1, 2013 MusclePharm used a manufacturer from TennesseeDue to ship directlythe uncertainty associated with determining our liability, if any, and due to our customers, and after that date MusclePharm took controlinability to ascertain with any reasonable degree of likelihood, as of the shipping and began shipping product to our customers from a previously leased 152,000 square foot distribution center in Franklin, Tennessee in close proximitydate of our manufacturer. Our products are transported from our manufacturer tothis report, the MusclePharm distribution center, but title doesoutcome of the trial, the Company has not pass from the manufacturer until loaded on the truckrecorded an estimate for shipment. Therefore, at this point, MusclePharm does not take title to our products. The facility in Franklin, Tennessee is operated with the Company’s equipment and employees. This transition away from having our Tennessee manufacturer ship product for us is an effort to reduce our costs and improve gross margins.its potential liability.

The Company also uses a manufacturer in New York for the manufacture of protein. These orders are typically large and heavy and are drop shipped directly to our customers at the time of order.

Costs associated to the shipments are recorded in cost of sales. For Canadian sales, the product is shipped from our Canadian warehouse to our customers. Costs associated with the shipments are recorded as shipping.

F-37F-52

On June 17, 2019, White Winston moved for the appointment of a temporary receiver over the Company, citing Plante Moran’s resignation. The court granted White Winston’s request to hold an evidentiary hearing on the motion, but subsequently stayed the action pending the parties’ attempts to resolve their dispute. Although the parties have been unable to reach a resolution, the litigation has not yet resumed. On July 30, 2019, White Winston filed an action in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles, seeking access to the Company’s books and records and requesting the appointment of an independent auditor for the Company. On February 25, 2021, the court ordered the Company to produce certain documents, denied White Winston’s request for an auditor, and ordered the Company to pay a $1,500 penalty. On July 20, 2021 the California court awarded White Winston $93,000 in attorneys’ fees and cost relating to the books-and-records action. The Company paid the amounts due on July 30, 2021, and on August 4, 2021 White Winston submitted a filing acknowledging that the California court’s judgment has been fully satisfied.

The Company and its Chief Executive Officer have been named as defendants in a new lawsuit filed on February 8, 2022 by White Winston Select Asset Funds, LLC and White Winston Select Asset Fund Series Fund MP-18, LLC (collectively, “White Winston”) in the Superior Court of Suffolk County Massachusetts. White Winston is bringing claims alleging unfair trade practices, abuse of process, malicious prosecution, breach of duty of loyalty and, in the alternative, for breach of the settlement agreement relating to the prior action filed by White Winston in Nevada. The Company has not yet responded to complaint and at this time cannot reasonably estimate any loss that may arise from this matter.

Bakery Barn, LLC v. MusclePharm Corporation

On January 24, 2022, Bakery Barn (“Bakery Barn”) filed suit against Company in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania court. Company received the Complaint on February 16, 2022. Bakery Barn alleges that the Company owes Bakery Barn over $1.9 million dollars for breach of contract. Parties operated on an open account basis with payment terms established by mutual verbal agreement, custom and usage. Beginning in late 2020, Bakery Barn resumed production for Company and operated under a verbal agreement until August 2021. Bakery Barn contends that Company is required to reimburse Bakery Barn for foil wraps ordered by Bakery Barn in the amount of $77,800, specific ingredients totaling $42,400, and products manufactured under purchase order Invoice no. 59192 delivered to Company in the amount of $1,816,017.

On February 24, 2022, Flaherty Fardo Rogel & Amick, LLC (“Company Counsel”) filed a Praecipe for Appearance on behalf of the Company. On February 28, 2022, Company Counsel filed Preliminary Objections to Complaint and Brief In Support Thereof. Bakery Barn filed an Amended Complaint in Civil Action on March 14, 2022. Company Counsel is in the process of filing Preliminary Objections to this Amended Complaint. The Company intends to continue to vigorously litigate the matter.

Bar Bakers, LLC v. CFC/Flavor Producers, LLC. Vs MusclePharm

On March 18, 2022, the Company retained Barnes & Thornburg to represent it in connection with a Cross-Complaint filed in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, Case No. 30-2019-01073098-CU-BC-CJC in the matter Bar Bakers LLC v. Creative Flavor Concepts, Inc. et al.. According to the pleadings, the matter arises from an agreement between the plaintiffs and defendants in which the plaintiff agreed to manufacturer energy bars and sell them to the defendants. The defendants then sold the energy bars to various retailers, including the Company. On May 29, 2019, the plaintiff sued the defendants alleging that the defendants were responsible for unpaid invoices – nine for bars manufactured and delivered to the Company and one invoice for raw materials. According to the pleadings, the unpaid invoices total $885,163.72. The invoice for the raw materials is allegedly $4,658,593.02. On January 31, 2022, one of the defendants, Flavor Producers LLC, filed and served a cross claim against the Company alleging that it was partially responsible for any damages that may befall on it. Specifically, Flavor Producers is asking the Court to award it $389,989.60 in compensatory damages. On March 25, 2022, the Company filed an answer to that cross claim denying the factual allegations and Flavor Producers’ assertion that it is entitled to any damages, including but not limited to, compensatory damages.

ThermoLife International

In January 2016, ThermoLife International LLC (“ThermoLife”), a supplier of nitrates to the Company, filed a complaint against the Company in Arizona state court. ThermoLife alleged that the Company failed to meet minimum purchase requirements contained in the parties’ supply agreement. The court held a bench trial on the issue of damages in October 2019, and on December 4, 2019, the court entered judgment in favor of ThermoLife and against the Company in the amount of $1.6 million, comprised of $0.9 million in damages, interest in the amount of $0.3 million and attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $0.4 million. The Company recorded $1.6 million in accrued expenses in 2018. The Company has filed an appeal and posted bonds in the total amount of $0.6 million in order to stay execution on the judgment pending appeal. Of the $0.6 million, $0.25 million (including fees) was paid by Mr. Drexler on behalf of the Company. See “Note 7. Debt” for additional information. The balance of $0.35 million was secured by a personal guaranty from Mr. Drexler, the associated fees of $12,500 and $2,500 have been paid by the Company. On April 27, 2021, the appellate court issued a decision largely affirming the trial court judgement, except vacating the judgement’s $0.3 million prejudgment interest award and remanding for a recalculation of prejudgment interest. On May 18, 2021, ThermoLife filed a motion asking the trial court to increase the Company’s appeal bond to the full amount of the judgment, or $1.9 million, which the Court denied on June 2, 2021.

F-53

As of March 31, 2022, the total amount accrued, including interest, was $1.9 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, interest expense recognized on the awarded damages was $0.022 million and $0.022 million, respectfully.

On May 4, 2022, the Arizona Supreme Court denied the Company’s petition for review of the decision of the appellate court and granted ThermoLife’s request for attorney’s fees.

SK Laboratories

On February 3, 2022, MusclePharm sued SK Laboratories in Washoe County (Nevada) District Court. According to the complaint, MusclePharm alleges SK Laboratories (1) breach its contract, (1) breach an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and (3) unjustly enriched itself by artificially inflating its costs and passing those costs onto MusclePharm in breach of its agreement, as well as failing to provide product that complied with Japanese import regulations. There has not been substantial activity in this case given its early stage.

On May 3, 2022, SK Laboratories sued MusclePharm and Ryan Drexler in Los Angeles County Superior Court. In its lawsuit, it is alleging (1) breach of contract, (2) breach of personal guaranty, (3) fraud, (4) unfair business practices, (5) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, (6) negligent interference with prospective economic advantage, and (7) common count on book account claim. According to the Complaint, SK Laboratories was a contract manufacturer for MusclePharm for approximately nine years manufacturing “a variety of nutritional supplement products.” Further, according to the complaint, SK Laboratories alleges that MusclePharm has defaulted on payments due on purchase orders totaling approximately $4,608,980.12, and a breach of personal guaranty of approximately $500,000 against Ryan Drexler for purchases of whey protein SK made on MusclePharm’s behalf. There has not been substantial activity in this case given its early stage. MusclePharm’s answer is due on approximately June 21, 2022.

Settlements

Manchester City Football Group

The Company was engaged in a dispute with City Football Group Limited (“CFG”), the owner of Manchester City Football Group, concerning amounts allegedly owed by the Company under a sponsorship agreement with CFG (the “Sponsorship Agreement”). In August 2016, CFG commenced arbitration in the United Kingdom against the Company, seeking approximately $8.3 million for the Company’s purported breach of the Sponsorship Agreement.

On July 28, 2017, the Company approved a Settlement Agreement (the “CFG Settlement Agreement”) with CFG effective July 7, 2017. The CFG Settlement Agreement represents a full and final settlement of all litigation between the parties. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company agreed to pay CFG a sum of $3 million, which was recorded as accrued expenses in 2017. The settlement consists of a $1.0 million payment that was advanced by a related party on July 7, 2017, a $1.0 million installment paid on July 7, 2018 and a subsequent $1.0 million installment payment to paid by July 7, 2019. Of this amount, the Company has remitted $0.3 million.

During the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company recorded a charge of $0.018 million and $0.018 million, respectively. This charge, representing imputed interest, is included in “Interest expense” in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

Nutrablend Matter

On February 27, 2020, Nutrablend, a manufacturer of MusclePharm products, filed an action against the Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, claiming approximately $3.1 million in allegedly unpaid invoices. These invoices relate to the third and fourth quarter of 2019, and a liability has been recorded for the related periods.

On September 25, 2020, the parties successfully mediated the case to a settlement (the “Nutrablend Agreement”) and the Company agreed to (i) pay approximately $3.1 million (“Owed Amount”) in monthly payments (“Monthly Payments”) from September 1, 2020 through June 30, 2023 and (ii) issue monthly purchase orders (“Purchase Orders”) at minimum amounts accepted by Nutrablend.

The Company agreed to issue Purchase Orders in a combined total amount of at least (i) $1.5 million from September 1, 2020 through November 30, 2020; (ii) $1.8 million from December 1, 2020 through February 28, 2021; (iii) $2.1 million from March 31, 2021 through May 31, 2021; (iv) $2.1 million from June 1, 2021 through August 31, 2021; and (v) $1.4 million from September 1, 2021 through October 30, 2021. Beginning on November 1, 2021, the Company will be required to issue monthly Purchase Orders to Nutrablend in a minimum amount of $0.7 million until the Owed Amount is paid in full to Nutrablend. In the event that the Company pays the Owed Amount in full before September 1, 2021, it’s entitled to a rebate on all completed Purchase Orders. Further, once the monthly payments, and any additional payments that the Company has made on the Owed Amount, reduce the outstanding balance of the Owed Amount to below $2.0 million, the Company is eligible for an extension of a line of credit from Nutrablend in an amount of up to $3.0 million.

On July 7, 2021, the Company commenced an action against Nutrablend in the Central District of California, seeking (i) a declaration that the Nutrablend Agreement purchase order provisions have been terminated due to Nutrablend’s failure to provide the Company with reasonable assurances of its ability to fulfill its purchase orders; (ii) a declaration that approximately $2.0 million in purchase orders that the Company placed in July and August 2020 were intended to and do count towards the minimums set forth in the Nutrablend Agreement; and (iii) damages based on Nutrablend’s failure to fulfill purchase orders. The case is ongoing.

As of March 31, 2022, the Company determined that approximately $0.998 million of the owed amount was due within a year, and this amount was recorded in “Accrued and other liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The present value of the remaining Owed Amount that was due after a year was $0.250 million, and the amount was recorded in “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company made payments of $0.303 million and $0.189 million during the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

F-54

On September 23, 2021, the Company entered into an Amendment to a Settlement Agreement that was originally entered into on September 25, 2020. Pursuant to the Amended Agreement, the Company is no longer obligated to issue Purchase Orders to Nutrablend as stated in the Settlement Agreement, which, as stated in the Form 8-K dated September 25, 2020, consisted of at least (i) $1.5 million from September 1, 2020 through November 30, 2020; (ii) $1.8 million from December 1, 2020 through February 28, 2021; (iii) $2.0 million from March 1, 2021 through May 31, 2021; (iv) $2.1 million from June 1, 2021 through August 31, 2021; and (v) $1.4 million from September 1, 2021 through October 30, 2021. The Monthly Payments provision of the Settlement Agreement remains unchanged.

4Excelsior Matter

On March 18, 2019, Excelsior Nutrition, Inc. (“4Excelsior”), a manufacturer of MusclePharm products, filed an action against the Company in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, claiming approximately $6.2 million in damages relating to allegedly unpaid invoices, as well as approximately $7.8 million in consequential damages.

On December 16, 2020, the Company and 4Excelsior entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (“the Agreement”), pursuant to which the parties resolved and settled the civil action pending in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles (the “Litigation”). The parties agreed to a mutual general release of claims and to jointly file within 10 business days of the effective date of the Agreement a stipulation and proposed order of dismissal, dismissing with prejudice all claims and counterclaims asserted in the Litigation. The Company agreed to pay $4.75 million (the “Settlement Amount”) in four monthly payments of $70,000, beginning January 5, 2021, and thereafter in monthly payments of $100,000 until the Settlement Amount is fully paid. The Company may prepay all or any portion of the Settlement Amount at any time without penalty or premium. The Agreement provides that, in the event of a Default (as defined in the Agreement) by the Company, the entire outstanding balance of the Settlement Amount will become immediately due and payable, plus accrued interest at a rate of 18% per annum, commencing from the date of default.

The Company determined that approximately $1.1 million of the Settlement Amount was due within a year, and this amount was recorded in “Accrued and other liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The present value of the remaining Settlement Amount that was due after a year was $1.6 million, and the amount was recorded in “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company made payments of $0.3 million and $0.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

The table below summarizes accrued expenses and interest expense incurred in for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 (in thousands):

Schedule of Accrued Expenses and Interest Expense

Cases 

Accrued Amount as of

March 31, 2022

  

Accrued Amount as of

December 31, 2021

  

Interest Expense for Period Ending

March 31, 2022

  

Interest Expense for Period Ending

March 31, 2021

 
Manchester City Football Group $730  $730  $(18) $(18)
Nutrablend Matter  1,248   1,493   (55)  (64)
4Excelsior Matter  2,715   2,938   (77)  (98)
ThermoLife International  1,364   1,364   (22)  (22)
Total $6,057  $6,525  $(172) $(202)

 

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsNote 9. Stock-Based Compensation

(

The Company’s stock-based compensation for the three months ended March 31, 2013)2022 and 2021 consisted primarily of stock option awards, and there was no activity other than vesting for the three months ended March 31, 2022.

(Unaudited)

Advertising

For the three months ended March 31, 2022, the Company recorded approximately $0.4 million of stock-based compensation expense related to stock options. The Company expenses advertising costs when incurred.

Advertisingdid not record stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:2021.

F-55

 

  Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2013  2012 
         
Advertising $2,317,377  $1,976,319 

Beneficial Conversion FeatureNote 10. Net Income (Loss) per Share

For conventional convertible debt whereThe following table sets forth the rate of conversion is below market value, the Company records a “beneficial conversion feature” (“BCF”) and related debt discount.

When the Company records a BCF, the relative fair value of the BCF is recorded as a debt discount against the face amount of the respective debt instrument. The discount is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt.

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consistscomputation of the Company’s trade payables as well as amounts estimated by managementbasic and diluted net income (loss) per share for future liability payments that relate to the current accounting period. Management reviews these estimates periodically to determine their reasonablenessyears presented (in thousands, except share and fair presentation.per share data):

Debt

The Company defines short term debt as any debt payment due less than one year from the dateSchedule of the financial statements. Long term debt is defined as any debt payment due more than one year from the date of the financial statements. Refer to Note 4 for further disclosure debt liabilities.

Derivative Liabilities

Fair value accounting requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments such as conversion features in equity instrumentsBasic and warrants granted, and measurement of their fair value. In determining the appropriate fair value, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. In assessing the convertible equity instruments, management determines if the convertible equity instrument is conventional convertible equity and further if the beneficial conversion feature requires separate measurement.

Once derivative liabilities are determined, they are adjusted to reflect fair value at the end of each reporting period. Any increase or decrease in the fair value is recorded in results of operations as an adjustment to fair value of derivatives. In addition, the fair value of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants, are also valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Once a derivative liability ceases to exist any remaining fair value is reclassified to additional paid in capital.

Deferred Equity Costs

The Company may pay costs related to the underwriting and offering of equity securities. These costs are treated as a reduction to equity capital raised and recorded in equity when the share issuances are recorded. Until the shares are recorded or until offering is aborted, these costs will be held on the balance sheet as a deferred asset.

Debt Issue Costs and Debt Discount

The Company may pay debt issue costs, and record debt discounts in connection with raising funds through the issuance of debt. These costs are amortized over the life of the debt to interest expense. If a conversion of the underlying debt occurs, a proportionate share of the unamortized amounts is immediately expensed.

F-38

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(March 31, 2013)

(Unaudited)

Original Issue Discount

For certain convertible debt issued, the Company provides the debt holder with an original issue discount. The original issue discount is recorded to debt discount and additional paid-in capital at an amount not to exceed gross proceeds raised, reducing the face amount of the debt, and is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt.

Share-Based Payments

Generally, all forms of share-based payments, including stock option grants, warrants and restricted stock grants and stock appreciation rights are measured at their fair value on the awards’ grant date, based on estimated number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Share-based compensation awards issued to non- employees for services rendered are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the fair value of the share-based payment, whichever is more readily determinable.

EarningsDiluted Net Income (loss) Per Share

         
  For the Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2022  2021 
Net Income (loss) $(6,301) $94 
Weighted average common shares used in computing net income (loss) per share, basic  33,386,200   33,119,549 
Potentially diluted securities     12,373,071 
Weighted average common shares used in computing net income (loss) per share, diluted  33,386,200   45,492,620 
Net income (loss) per share, basic $(0.19) $0.00 
Net income (loss) per share, diluted $(0.19) $0.00 

Net earningsBasic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period.

Diluted earningsnet income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock, common stock equivalents and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during each period. The Company uses the treasury stock method to determine whether there is a dilutive effect of outstanding potentially dilutive securities, and the if-converted method to assess the dilutive effect of the convertible notes.

SinceAs of March 31, 2022, there were fully vested stock options of 1,651,884 that would have been dilutive had the Company reflected ahad net lossincome.

The following securities were excluded from the computations of the diluted net income (loss) per share, for the three months ended March 31, 20132022 and 2012, respectively,2021 as the effect of considering any common stock equivalents, if exercisable,the securities would have been anti-dilutive. A separate computationbe anti-dilutive:

Schedule of diluted earnings (loss) per share is not presented.Outstanding Potentially Dilutive Securities

       
  As of March 31, 
  2022  2021 
Stock options  5,399,441   171,703 
Warrants  17,355,700   - 
Convertible notes  16,154,795   12,373,071 
Total common stock equivalents  38,909,936   12,544,774 

The Company has the following common stock equivalents for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively:

  Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2013  2012 
Stock options (exercise price - $425/share)  670   1,903 
Warrants (exercise price $4 – $1,275/share)  687,839   84,820 
Convertible debt (exercise price $17/share)  -   2,471 
Total common stock equivalents  688,509   89,194 

In the above table, someaverage exercise price of the outstanding instruments from 2013stock options and 2012 contain ratchet provisions that would cause variability in the exercise price at the balance sheet date. As a result, common stock equivalents could change at each reporting period.

Foreign Currency

MusclePharm began operations in Canada in April of 2012. The Canadian Dollar was determined to be the functional currency as the majority of the transactions related to the day to day operations of the business are exchanged in Canadian Dollars. At the end of the period, the financial results of the Canadian operation are translated into United States Dollars, which is our reporting currency, and added to the U.S. operations for consolidated company financial results. The revenue and expense items are translated using the average rate for the period and the assets and liabilities at the end of period rate. Transactions that have completed the accounting cycle and resulted in a gain or loss related to translation are recorded in realized gain or loss due to foreign currency translation under other income expense on the income statement. Transactions that have not completed their accounting cycle but appear to have gain or loss due to the translation process are recorded as unrealized gain or loss due to translation and held in the equity section on the balance sheet until such date the accounting cycle of the transaction is complete and the actual realized gain or loss is recognized.

Reclassification

The Company has reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the periods presented.

F-39

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(March 31, 2013)

(Unaudited)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04 “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in GAAP and IFRS”. ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between GAAP and the International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). ASU 2011-04 requires reporting entities to disclose additional information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, ASU 2011-04 requires reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. This pronouncement has been implemented in the Company’s financial statements for all periods after and including the year ended December 31, 2012 without impact.

Note 3: Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

  As of March 31, 2013  As of December 31, 2012  Estimated Useful Life
Furniture, fixtures and gym equipment $1,516,320  $1,323,998  3 years
Leasehold improvements  585,455   563,204  From 42 to 64 months
Vehicles  100,584   100,584  5 years
Displays  32,057   32,057  5 years
Website  11,462   11,462  3 years
Total  2,245,878   2,031,305   
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (836,282)  (674,941)  
  $1,409,596  $1,356,364   

Note 4: Debt

At March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, debt consists of the following:

  As of March 31, 2013  As of December 31, 2012 
       
Auto loan - secured $12,577   15,380 
         
Unsecured debt  64,600   4,452,183 
Less: debt discount  -   - 
Unsecured debt - net  64,600   4,452,183 
         
Total debt  77,177   4,467,563 
         
Less: current portion  (76,671)  (4,463,040)
         
Long term debt $506  $4,523 

Debt in default of $64,600 at March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is included as a component of short-term debt.

Future annual principal payments for the above debt is as follows:

Years Ending December 31,   
2013 (9 months) $73,688 
2014  3,489 
Total annual principal payments $77,177 

F-40

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(March 31, 2013)

(Unaudited)

Convertible Debt – Secured - Derivative Liabilities

During the three months ended March 31, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued convertible debt totaling $0 and $519,950, respectively. The convertible debt includes the following terms:

    Three Months Ended  Year Ended 
    March 31, 2013  December 31, 2012 
    Amount of  Amount of 
    Principal Raised  Principal Raised 
Interest Rate    -   8% - 10% 
Default interest rate    -   0% - 20% 
Maturity        January 3, 2012 to October 11, 2014 
           
Conversion terms 1 62% of lowest trade price for the last 7 trading days  -   100,000 
Conversion terms 2 65% of the lowest trade price in the 30 trading days previous to the conversion  -   19,950 
Conversion terms 3 35% multiplied by the average of the lowest three (3) trading prices (as defined below) for the common stock during the ten (10) trading day period ending on the latest complete trading day prior to the conversion date.  -   400,000 
    $-  $519,950 

The debt holders are entitled, at their option, to convert all or part of the principal and accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock at the conversion prices and terms discussed above. The Company classifies embedded conversion features in these notes as a derivative liability due to management’s assessment that the Company may not have sufficient authorized number of shares of common stock required to net-share settle or due to the existence of a ratchet due to an anti-dilution provision. See Note 5 regarding accounting for derivative liabilities.

(A) Unsecured Debt

Unsecured debt consisted of the following activity and terms:

    
Balance - December 31, 2012 $4,452,183 
Repayments  (4,387,583)
Balance – March 31, 2013 $64,600 

(B) Vehicle Loan

Vehicle loan account consisted of the following activity and terms:

     Interest Rate  Maturity 
Balance - December 31, 2012 $15,380   6.99%  26 payments of $1,008 
Repayments  (2,803)        
Balance - March 31, 2013 $12,577         

(C) Debt Issue Costs

During the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company paid debt issue costs totaling $0 and $30,000, respectively.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company issued 22,633 warrants as cost associated with a debt raise. The initial derivative liability value of $427,759 was recorded as debt issue costs and derivative liability.

The following is a summary of the Company’s debt issue costs for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and year ended December 31, 2012 as follows:

  2013  2012 
Debt issue costs $335,433  $851,923 
Accumulated amortization of debt issue costs  (335,433)  (516,490)
Debt issue costs – net $-  $335,433 

F-41

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(March 31, 2013)

(Unaudited)

During the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company amortized $335,433 and $97,612, respectively in debt issue costs.

Note 5: Derivative Liabilities

The Company identified conversion features embedded within consulting agreements and Series D Preferred Stock issued in 2013. The Company has determined that the features associated with the embedded conversion option should be accounted for at fair value as a derivative liability as the Company could not determine if a sufficient number of shares would be available to settle all transactions.

The fair value of the conversion feature is summarized as follows:

Derivative liability - December 31, 2012 $- 
Fair value at the commitment date for equity instruments  8,175,459 
Fair value at the commitment date for warrants issued  96,913 
Fair value mark to market adjustment for equity instruments  5,950,959 
Fair value mark to market adjustment for warrants  93,684 
Conversion instruments exercised  (9,063,241)
Derivative liability – March 31, 2013 $5,253,774 

The Company recorded the day 1 value of derivative contracts associated with the Series D preferred stock issuance against gross proceeds raised, and expensed immediately the remaining value of the derivative as it exceeded the gross proceeds of the offering. The Company recorded a derivative expense of $96,913 and $1,459,910 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The fair value at the commitment and re-measurement dates for the Company’s derivative liabilities were based upon the following management assumptions:

  Commitment Date  Re-measurement Date 
Expected dividends  0%  0%
Expected volatility  118% - 123%   116%
Expected term:  1 year   10 months – 1 year 
Risk free interest rate  0.14% - 0.15%   0.14%

Note 6: Restricted Stock Units

In November 2012, the Company granted the Executive Vice President and Co-Chairman, Mr. John H. Bluher, 70,589 restricted stock units through a restricted stock unit agreement. Each restricted stock unit represents a contingent right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock upon vesting. The value of this award at the grant date was $245,400 and will be amortized over the vesting periods such that each tranche of restricted stock units will be fully amortized at the date of vesting.  The restricted stock units vest in one tranche of 23,529 on January 1, 2013 and two tranches of 23,530 shares on January 1, 2014 and December 1, 2014.  As of March 31, 2013, 23,529 restricted stock units have vested and the unamortized portion of this award2022 is $143,430.$0.78.

In November 2012, the Company granted the Chief Financial Officer, Mr. L. Gary Davis, 58,824 restricted stock units through a restricted stock unit agreement. Each restricted stock unit represents a contingent right to receive one share of theNote 11. Income Taxes

The Company’s common stock upon vesting. The value of this award at the grant date was $204,500 and will be amortized over the vesting periods such that each tranche of restricted stock units will be fully amortized at the date of vesting.  The restricted stock units vest in three tranches of 19,608 shares each on January 1, 2013 and 2014, and December 1, 2014.  As of March 31, 2013, 19,608 restricted stock units have vested and the unamortized portion of this award $119,525.

F-42

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(March 31, 2013)

(Unaudited)

Note 7: Stockholders’ Equity

The Company has four separate series of authorized preferred stock:

On November 26, 2012, the Company (i) effected a 1-for-850 reverse stock split of our common stock, including a proportionate reduction in the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 2.36 billion shares to 2.8 million shares of common stock, and (ii) amended our articles of incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock (post reverse stock split) from 2,941,177 to 100 million effective November 27, 2012.  All share and per share amounts in this document have been changed to give effect to the reverse stock split.

(A) Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

This class of stock has the following provisions:

·Non-voting,
·No rights to dividends,
·No liquidation value, and
·Convertible into 200 shares of common stock.

(B) Series B Preferred Stock (Related Parties)

In August 2011, the Company issued an aggregate of 51 shares of Series B Preferred Stock to two of its officers. The Company accounted for the share issuance at par value as there was no future economic value that could be associated with the issuance.

This class of stock has the following provisions:

·Voting rights entitling the holders to an aggregate 51% voting control,
·No rights to dividends,
·Stated value of $0.001 per share,
·Liquidation rights entitle the receipt of net assets on a pro-rata basis with the holders of our common stock; and
·Non-convertible.

(C) Series C Convertible Preferred Stock

In October 2011, the Company issued 190 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, having a fair value of $190,000. Of the total shares issued, 100 shares were issued for $100,000 ($1,000 /share). The remaining 90 shares were issued for services rendered having a fair value of $90,000 ($1,000 /share), based upon the stated value per share. In March 2012, all 190 shares were converted into 22,353 shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.0085 per share and a loss of $614,984.

This class of stock has the following provisions:

·Stated Value - $1,000 per share,
·Non-voting,
·Liquidation rights entitle an amount equal to the stated value, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends,
·As long as any Series C, Convertible Preferred Stock is outstanding, the Company is prohibited from executing various corporate actions without the majority consent of the holders of Series C, Convertible Preferred Stockholders authorization; and
·Convertible at the higher of (a) $0.01 or (b) such price that is a 50% discount to market using the average of the low two closing bid prices, five days preceding conversion.

Due to the existence of an option to convert at a variable amount, the Company treated this series of preferred stock as a derivative liability due to the potential for settlement in a variable quantity of shares. Additionally, the Company computed the fair value of the derivative liability at the commitment date and re-measurement date, which was $293 and $175, respectively, using the Black-Scholes assumptions below. This transaction is analogous to a dividend with a direct charge to retained earnings.

F-43

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(March 31, 2013)

(Unaudited)

(D) Series D Convertible Preferred Stock

In January 2013 the board of directors authorized 1,600,000 shares of Series D convertible preferred stock. Between January 16, 2013 and February 4, 2013, the Company entered into separate subscription agreements with certain investors in connection with the offering, pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of Preferred Stock for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $12 million. Pursuant to the Certificate of Designation of the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on January 11, 2013 (the “Certificate of Designation”), each share of Preferred Stock is convertible into two shares of common stock, subject to adjustment as set forth in the Certificate of Designation. 

The shares of Series D have the following provisions:

·Voting rights based on number of common shares of conversion option;
·Initially no rights to dividends;
·Liquidation rights entitle an amount equal to the stated value, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends,
·Convertible into 2 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment.

(E) Common Stock

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company issued the following common stock:

Transaction Type Quantity
(#)
  Valuation
($)
  Range of Value
per Share
($)
 
Conversion of Series D preferred stock to common stock  2,352,250   9,063,241   2.81 – 7.06 
Cash and warrants  703,236   5,827,499   8.29 
Executive/Board of Director compensation  62,289   264,879   3.47 – 6.00 
Stock issued for services  927,742   6,993,032   4.02 – 8.43 
Total  4,045,517   22,148,651   2.81 – 8.43 

The fair value of all stock issuances above is based upon either the quoted closing trading price on the date of issuance, the value of derivative instrument at the date of conversion, contract value where the fair value was stated by the contract, or net proceeds from capital raised after giving effect to the cost of capital raised.

(F) Stock Options

The Company applied fair value accounting for all shares based payments awards. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes assumptions used when the options were issued in the year ended December 31, 2010 are as follows:

Exercise price $425 
Expected dividends  0%
Expected volatility  74.8%
Risk fee interest rate  1.4%
Expected life of option  5 years 
Expected forfeiture  0%

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(March 31, 2013)

(Unaudited)

The following is a summary of the Company’s stock option activity:

  Options  Weighted Average
Exercise Price
  Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
  Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
 
Balance – December 31, 2012  1,847  $425.00   2.25 years   - 
Granted  -             
Exercised  -             
Forfeited/Cancelled  (1,177) $425.00         
Balance – March 31, 2013 – outstanding  670  $425.00   2 years   - 
Balance – March 31, 2013 – exercisable  670  $425.00   2 years   - 
Outstanding options held by related parties – 2013  -             
Exercisable options held by related parties – 2013  -             

(G) Stock Warrants

All warrants issued during the three months ended March 31, 2013 were accounted for as derivative liabilities. See Note 5.

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company entered into convertible equity agreements. As part of these agreements, the Company issued warrants to convert 1,500,000 shares of Series D preferred stock into 3,000,000 shares of common stock.

A summary of warrant activity for the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2013 is as follows:

  Number of Warrants  Weighted Average Exercise Price 
Outstanding – December 31, 2012  89  $1,275 
Granted  3,040,000   4.09 
Exercised  (2,352,250)  4.38 
Balance as March 31, 2013  687,839  $4.54 

Warrants Outstanding Warrants Exercisable   
Range of
Exercise Prices
 Number
Outstanding
  Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life (in
years)
  Weighted Average
Exercise Price
  Number
Exercisable
 Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
  Intrinsic Value 
$4 - $1,275  687,839   0.99  $4.54  667,750 $4.15   2,771,000 

(H) Treasury Stock

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company repurchased 18,825 shares of its common stock for the total sum of $260,000 as part of a settlement. Of this amount, 103,537 or $5.50 per share was considered repurchase of securities and $156,463 was recorded as a loss on settlement. The Company records the value of its common stock held in treasury at cost. The Company has not cancelled or retired these shares, and they remain available for reissuance. The Company has a stock repurchase plan in place but has suspended it indefinitely.

Note 8: Commitments, Contingencies and Other Matters

(A) Operating Lease

The Company has various non-cancelable leases with terms expiring through 2015.

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(March 31, 2013)

(Unaudited)

Future minimum annual lease payments for the above leases are approximately as follows:

Years Ending December 31,    
2013 (9 months) $260,210 
2014  436,688 
2015  311,209 
Total minimum lease payments $1,008,107 

Renttax expense for the three months ended March 31, 20132022 and 2012,2021 was $131,717 and $43,573, respectively.zero.

(B) Legal Matters

From time to time,Income taxes are provided for the Company is or may become involved in various legal proceedings that arisetax effects of transactions reported in the ordinary courseconsolidated financial statements and consist of businesstaxes currently due. Deferred taxes relate to differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting which will be either taxable or otherwise. Legal proceedingsdeductible when the assets or liabilities are subject to inherent uncertainties as to timing, outcomes, costs, expenses and time expenditures byrecovered or settled. In assessing the Company’srealizability of deferred tax assets, management and others on behalfconsiders whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the Company. Although there can be no assurance, based on information currently available the Company’s management believes that the outcome of legal proceedings that are pending or threatened against the Companydeferred income tax assets will not have a material effectbe realized. The ultimate realization of deferred income tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.

Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred income tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based on the Company’s financial condition. However, the outcome of anyconsideration of these matters is neither probable nor reasonably estimable.

Asitems, management has determined that enough uncertainty exists relative to the realization of the deferred income tax asset balances to warrant the application of a full valuation allowance as of March 31, 2013,2022.

F-56

Note 12. Segment Information and Geographic Data

Historically, the Company’s chief operating decision maker reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance. As such, the Company washas had a party defendant insingle reporting segment and operating unit structure. During the following legal proceedings, eachthird quarter of which the Company: (a) believes is without merit; and (b) intends to defend vigorously:

·The Tawnsaura Group, LLC v MusclePharm Corporation, Case No: 8:12-cv-01476-JVS-RNB in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.  Date instituted: September 12, 2012. Plaintiff alleges patent infringement for MusclePharm's use of Citrulline Malate in its products.  To date, Plaintiff has filed against over 70 different manufacturers of dietary supplements and sports nutrition products. MusclePharm is part of a joint defense group and believes this case is without merit due to the existence of prior art.

·William Bossung and Bishop Equity Partners LLC v. MusclePharm Corporation, Clark County, Nevada District Court. Date instituted: January 17, 2012. Plaintiff alleges that additional monetary payments are due in respect of a settlement for outstanding warrants.

As of March 31, 2013,2021, the Company wasintroduced a party plaintiff infunctional energy beverages line under the following legal matters:

·MusclePharm Corporation v. Swole Sports Nutrition, LLC, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Date instituted: March 15, 2012. The Company filed this action for trademark infringement against after the Defendant started marketing and selling a dietary supplement named “Turbo Shred”. The Company has sold “Shred Matrix” since April 2, 2008, and the mark “MusclePharm Shred Matrix” was granted registration by the USPTO on September 21, 2010.

(C) Payroll Taxes

AsMusclePharm and FitMiss brands, at which time, the CODM commenced reviewing financial information on a disaggregated basis with the functional energy drink business separate from base business of March 31, 2013, accounts payable and accrued expenses included $40,707 pertaining to accrued payroll taxes. The taxes represent employee withholdings that have yet to be remitted toprotein products. During 2021, revenues for the taxing agencies.

(D) Product Liability

As a manufacturer of nutritional supplements and other consumer products that are ingested by consumers, the Company may be subject to various product liability claims. Although we havefunctional energy drink segment were not had any material, claims to date,but it is possible that currentanticipated to become a more significant segment of the Company’s business going forward. (All amounts below are in thousands):

Schedule of Significant Segment Business Going Forward

  2022  2021 
  Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2022  2021 
Revenue, net        
Protein products $12,000  $13,121 
Energy drinks  1,101    
Total revenue, net $13,101  $13,121 

Schedule of Business Revenue and future product liability claims could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The Company currently maintains product liability insurance with a deductible/retention of $10,000 per claim with an aggregate cap on retained loss of $5,000,000. At March 31, 2013Profits

  Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 
  Revenue  Cost of Revenue  Gross Profit 
Protein products $12,000  $10,875  $1,125 
Energy drinks  1,101   717   384 
Total $13,101  $11,592  $1,509 

As the Company had not recorded any accruals for product liability claims.

(E) Other Liabilities

Subsequent to December 31, 2012, the Company determined that it may have potential liabilitiesCompany’s products are made through contract manufacturers’, there were no capital expenditures related to the filing of certain informational returns required by governmental authorities.  Management has developed a plan to address these matters and does not currently expect a significant adverse impact on its financial position or results of operations.

F-46

MusclePharm Corporation and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(March 31, 2013)

(Unaudited)

Note 9: Defined Contribution Plan

The Company established a 401(k) Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) for eligible employees of the Company. Generally, all employees of the Company who are at least twenty-one years of age and who have completed one year of entry service are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan. The 401(k) Plan is a defined contribution plan that provides that participants may make voluntary salary deferral contributions, on a pretax basis, of up to $17,000 for 2012 (subject to make-up contributions) in the form of voluntary payroll deductions. The Company may make discretionary contributions. Duringeither segment during the three months ended March 31, 20132022 and 2012 the Company’s matching contribution was $12,791 and none, respectively. 2021. Energy segment assets were not material as of March 31, 2022.

Note 10: Related Party Transactions

The Chief Executive Officer of one of our major customers is the brother of our Chief Marketing Officer.  Our Chief Financial Officer also indirectly owns 1.75% of the equity interest of the Chief Executive Officer in such customer. We do not offer preferential pricing of our products to this customer based on these relationships. 

Note 11: Subsequent Events

On July 19, 2012, we entered into a consulting agreement (the “Original GRQ Consulting Agreement”) with GRQ Consultants, Inc. (“GRQ”, and together with Melechdavid, collectively, the “Consultants”). The Original GRQ Consulting Agreement provides that the Company will issue to GRQ shares of common stock in an amount equal to 4.2%All of the Company’s outstanding common stock on a fully diluted (as-converted) basis. Further, until July 12, 2014,assets are located in the CompanyUnited States.

Geographic Information:

Revenue, classified by the major geographic areas in which our customers are located is required to ensure that GRQ shall maintain its 4.2% fully diluted equity position. The termas follows:

Schedule of the Original GRQ Consulting Agreement is 12 months.Revenue, Major Geographical Areas

  2022  2021 
  Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2022  2021 
United States  94%  71%
Other Countries  6%  29%
Total revenue  100%  100%

On April 2, 2013, the Company entered into a first amendment to the Original Melechdavid Consulting Agreement with Melechdavid, effective as of March 28, 2013 (the “Melechdavid Amended Agreement”). Pursuant to the Melechdavid Amended Agreement, Melechdavid agreed to cap the shares of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”) that it is entitled to receive under the Original Melechdavid Consulting Agreement to noNo other country accounted for more than 570,000 shares5% of revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021. Geographically, sales to other countries are diverse – spanning every continent except Antarctica.

Schedule of Revenue, Net by Geographic Area

  2022  2021 
  Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2022  2021 
Revenue, net        
Protein products        
United States $11,297  $9,274 
International  703   3,847 
Total Protein Products $12,000  $13,121 
         
Energy drinks        
United States  1,070   - 
International  31   - 
Total energy drinks $1,101  $- 
Total revenue, net $13,101  $13,121 

F-57

Shares of Common Stock of the Company, after giving effect to the 1-for-850 reverse stock split of the Common Stock effected by the Company on November 26, 2012. In connection with the execution and delivery of the Melechdavid Amended Agreement, the Company issued Melechdavid an aggregate of 341,247 shares of Common Stock on March 29, 2013 and agreed to issue Melechdavid an additional 228,753 shares of Common Stock within five business days of the Melechdavid Amended Agreement as full satisfaction of the Company’s obligations under the Original Melechdavid Consulting Agreement .

On April 2, 2013, the Company entered into a first amendment to the Original GRQ Consulting Agreement with GRQ, effective as of March 28, 2013 (the “GRQ Amended Agreement”). Pursuant to the GRQ Amended Agreement, GRQ agreed to cap the shares of the Company’s Common Stock that it is entitled to receive under the Original GRQ Consulting Agreement to no more than 420,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company, after giving effect to the 1-for-850 reverse stock split of the Common Stock effected by the Company on November 26, 2012. In connection with the execution and delivery of the GRQ Amended Agreement, the Company issued GRQ an aggregate of 305,889 shares of Common Stock on March 29, 2013 and agreed to issue GRQ an additional 78,753 shares of Common Stock within five business days of the GRQ Amended Agreement as full satisfaction of the Company’s obligations under the Original GRQ Consulting Agreement . The Company had previously issued GRQ 35,359 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the Original GRQ Consulting Agreement.

On April 19, 2013 the Company filed three post-effective amendments to S-1 registration statements that were previously filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and declared effective. The purpose of such post-effective amendments was to update certain financial information and other disclosures.

F-47

 

 

PROSPECTUS

1,740,691 Shares of Common Stock

 

PROSPECTUS 

Roth Capital Partners

July 15, 2013, 2022

 
 

PART II

II- INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

Item 13.Other Expenses of Issuance and DistributionDistribution.

The following table sets forth allthe costs and expenses to be paidpayable by the Registrant, other than estimated placement agents’ fees,Company in connection with our public offering.the issuance and distribution of the securities being registered hereunder. All amounts shown are estimates except for the SEC registration fee and the FINRA filing fee:fee.

SEC registration fee $2,554 
FINRA filing fee $____ 
Legal fees and expenses $25,000*
Accounting fees and expenses $____*
Transfer agent and registrar fees $____*
Printing and engraving expenses $5,000*
Miscellaneous fees and expenses $446*
Escrow agent fees and expenses $ *
Total $33,000*
SEC registration fees$
Printing expenses$
Accounting fees and expenses$
Legal fees and expenses$
Miscellaneous$
Total$

* Estimated.

Item 14.Indemnification of Directors and OfficersOfficers.

Section 78.7502(1) of the Nevada Revised Statutes provides that a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party, or is threatened to be made a party, to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (except in an action brought by or on behalf of the corporation) if that person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise, against expenses, including attorneys'attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by that person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding, if that person acted in good faith and in a manner which that person reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceedings, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, alone, does not create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which the person reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation, and that, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, the person had reasonable cause to believe his action was unlawful.

Section 78.7502(2) of the Nevada Revised Statutes provides that a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit brought by or on behalf of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor because the person acted in any of the capacities set forth above, against expenses, including amounts paid in settlement and attorneys'attorneys’ fees, actually and reasonably incurred by that person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit, if the person acted in accordance with the standard set forth above, except that no indemnification may be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction after exhaustion of all appeals therefrom to be liable to the corporation or for amounts paid in settlement to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the court in which such action or suit was brought or other court of competent jurisdiction determines that, in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the court deems proper.

II-1

Section 78.7502(3) of the Nevada Revised Statutes further provides that, to the extent a director or officer of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in subsections 1 and 2 thereof, or in the defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, that person shall be indemnified by the corporation against expenses (including attorneys'attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by that person in connection therewith.

II-1

Section 78.751 of the Nevada Revised Statutes provides that unless indemnification is ordered by a court, the determination to provide indemnification must be made by the stockholders, by a majority vote of a quorum of the board of directors who were not parties to the action, suit or proceeding, or in specified circumstances by independent legal counsel in a written opinion. In addition, the articles of incorporation, bylaws or an agreement made by the corporation may provide for the payment of the expenses of a director or officer of the expenses of defending an action as incurred upon receipt of an undertaking to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that the person is not entitled to indemnification. Section 78.751 of the Nevada Revised Statutes further provides that the indemnification provided for therein shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which the indemnified party may be entitled and that the scope of indemnification shall continue as to directors, officers, employees or agents who have ceased to hold such positions, and to their heirs, executors and administrators.

Section 78.752 of the Nevada Revised Statutes provides that a corporation may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation against any liability asserted against him or incurred by him in any such capacity or arising out of his status as such whether or not the corporation would have the authority to indemnify him against such liabilities and expenses.

Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

Our articlesArticles of incorporation, as amended, do not include specific provisions relating to the indemnification of our directors or officers.

Our bylaws provide that every director, officer, or employee of the Company shall be indemnified by the Company against all expenses and liabilities, including counsel fees, reasonably incurred by or imposed upon such individual in connection with any proceeding to which he or she may be made a party, or in which he or she may become involved, by reason of being or having been a director, officer, employee or agent of the Company (or by serving or having served at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of any other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or enterprise), or any settlement of such proceeding (except as described below). The bylaws furtherIncorporation provide that the Company must provide such indemnification whether or not the indemnified person is a director, officer, employee or agent at the time such expenses are incurred, except in such cases wherein the director, officer, employee or agent is adjudged guilty of willful misfeasance or malfeasance in the performance of his or her duties. However, in the event of a settlement the indemnification to be provided pursuant to the bylaws shall, apply only when the Company’s board of directors approves such settlement and reimbursement as being for the best interests of the Company.

In addition to the indemnification provisions described above, our bylaws also require the Company to provide to any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the Company (or who is or was serving at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or enterprise), the indemnity against expenses of a suit, litigation or other proceedings which is specifically permissible under applicable law. Our bylaws further permit our board of directors, in their discretion, to direct the purchase of liability insurance.

Indemnification Agreements

We have also entered into individual indemnification agreements with our directors and named executive officers. These agreements indemnify those directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by lawthe provisions of Section 78.751 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, indemnify any and all persons whom it shall have the power to indemnify under such section.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against inordinate risks of claimspublic policy as expressed in such Act and actions against them arising out of their service to and activities on behalf of MusclePharm.is, therefore, unenforceable.

II-2

Item 15.Recent Sales of Unregistered SecuritiesSecurities.

Issuance of Shares of Common Stock Pursuant to a Share Exchange Agreement

On February 18, 2010, the Company issued a total of 30,589 shares of common stock to the 12 former owners of Muscle Pharm, LLC, in exchange for all of the Muscle Pharm, LLC units.

Issuance of Shares of Common Stock in Exchange for Cancellation of Warrant Agreements

From May 17, 2012 and August 9, 2012, the Company issued 32,977 shares of common stock to holders of warrant agreements in exchange for the cancellation of such agreements.

From September 28, 2012 to September 30, 2012, the Company issued 512,631 shares of common stock in exchange for cancellation of warrants exercisable for 723,746 shares of common stock.

On December 7, 2012, the Company issued 3,677 shares of common stock in exchange for cancellation of warrants exercisable for 4,902 shares of common stock.

Conversion of Shares of Series A Preferred Stock into Shares of Common Stock

From February 26, 2010 to December 30, 2010, the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock was converted into 19,608 shares of our common stock.

Conversion of Shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into Shares of Common Stock

On March 28, 2012, the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock was converted into 22,353 shares of our common stock.

Conversion of Convertible Notes into Shares of Common Stock

From March 22, 2010 through December 14, 2010, holders of convertible notes converted an aggregate of $1,033,500 in principal into an aggregate of 9,070 shares of common stock.

From January 25, 2011 through December 31 2011, holders of convertible notes converted an aggregate of $3,393,346 in principal into an aggregate of 336,964 shares of common stock.

 From January 4, 2012 through March 22, 2012, holders of convertible notes converted an aggregate of $941,785 in principal into an aggregate of 290,951 shares of common stock.

Exercise of Warrants

On January 26, 2012, warrant holders exercised warrants for an aggregate of 37,648 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $7.58 per share.

Issuance of Convertible Debt

Date of SaleAggregate
Amount Sold
($)
12/1/101,650,000
3/8/11100,000
3/14/1150,000
6/3/201125,000
6/14/1140,000
6/23/201120,000
6/29/11666,000(1)
11/23/201126,353
1/03/2012100,000
1/13//2012400,000

II-3

1.The Company also issued a warrant to purchase $800,000 of common stock pursuant to a formula based on the market price of common stock.

Issuance of Promissory Notes

Date of SaleAggregate
Amount Sold
($)
10/28/1115,000
11/1/11382,000(1)
11/13/1125,000(2)
11/25/2011250,000(3)
12/02/2011150,000(4)
12/08/201110,000(5)
12/09/2011250,000(6)
12/19/2011100,000(7)
12/21/2011223,000(8)
1/13/2012250,000(9)
2/15/2012525,000(10)
2/23/201212,500(11)
2/29/201250,000(12)
3/15/2012500,000(13)
3/16/201252,500(14)
3/20/201265,000(15)
3/21/201215,000(16)
3/22/2012297,000(17)
3/28/201250,000(18)
3/30/2012506,000(19)
4/16/20121,231,000(20)
12/04/20121,000,000(21)

1.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 25,680 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $14.87 per share.
2.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 1,961 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.75 per share.
3.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 7,353 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.75 per share.
4.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 11,765 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.75 per share.
5.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 785 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.75 per share.
6.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 19,608 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.75 per share.
7.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 7,844 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.75 per share.
8.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 17,492 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.75 per share.
9.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 19,608 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.75 per share.
10.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 41,177 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.75 per share.

II-4

11.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 981 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.75 per share.
12.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 3,922 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $12.75 per share.
13.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 49,020 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.20 per share.
14.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 5,148 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.20 per share.
15.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 6,373 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.20 per share.
16.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 1,471 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.20 per share.
17.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 29,120 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.20 per share.
18.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 4,902 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.20 per share.
19.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 51,963 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.20 per share.
20.The Company also issued warrants in respect of 118,334 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.20 per share.
21.The Company also issued 50,000 shares of common stock as consideration for agreeing to enter into the promissory notes.

Issuance of Shares of Common Stock to Extend Debt Agreements

On May 5, 2010, the Company issued a noteholder 18 shares of common stock in consideration for an extension of the noteholder’s note. The issuance was recorded as interest at a fair value of $17,250 ($977.50 per share) based upon the closing price of the common stock on the date of issuance.

On May 5, 2010, the Company issued a noteholder 18 shares of common stock in consideration for an extension of the noteholder’s note. The issuance was recorded as interest at a fair value of $17,250 ($977.50 per share) based upon the closing price of the common stock on the date of issuance.

On September 21, 2010, the Company issued a noteholder 89 shares of common stock in consideration for an extension of the noteholder’s note. The issuance was recorded as interest at a fair value of $45,750 ($518.50 per share) based upon the closing price of the common stock on the date of issuance.

On September 21, 2010, the Company issued a noteholder 15 shares of common stock in consideration for an extension of the noteholder’s note. The issuance was recorded as interest at a fair value of $7,625 ($518.50 per share) based upon the closing price of the common stock on the date of issuance.

On September 21, 2010, the Company issued a noteholder 15 shares of common stock in consideration for an extension of the noteholder’s note. The issuance was recorded as interest at a fair value of $7,625 ($518.50 per share) based upon the closing price of the common stock on the date of issuance.

On June 7, 2011, the Company issued a noteholder 474 shares of common stock in consideration for an extension of the noteholder’s note. The issuance was recorded as interest at a fair value of $14,778 ($31.45 per share) based upon the closing price of the common stock on the date of issuance.

On October 9, 2012, the Company issued certain noteholders 8,944 shares of common stock for deferral of certain principal and interest payments for three months.

Issuance of Shares of Common Stock to Settle Notes Payable

On September 29, 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,313 shares of common stock to note holders in settlement of principal and accrued interest in the aggregate amount of $678,325.

On December 14, 2010, the Company issued an aggregate of 11,014 shares of common stock to note holders in settlement of principal and accrued interest in the aggregate amount of $468,077.

Issuance of Shares of Common Stock to Settle Contracts

On December 23, 2010, the Company issued 602 shares of common stock in settlement of an outstanding contract with a vendor.

On September 11, 2012, the Company issued 4,263 shares of common stock in settlement of an outstanding contract valued at approximately $50,000.

On October 22, 2012, the Company issued 7,059 shares of common stock in settlement of an outstanding contract valued at approximately $40,200.

II-5

Issuance of Shares of Common Stock to Settle Aged Debt

From December 27, 2010 through August 4, 2011, the Company issued securities exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act, to third party funds. Pursuant to these transactions, the Company directed its transfer agent to issue and deliver to the third parties 78,620 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment, in satisfaction of a debt in the amount of $2,099,001.

Issuance of Shares of Common Stock to Debt Holders

On September 21, 2010, the Company issued one investor 40 shares of common stock as further consideration for the investor to enter into a debt agreement with the Company.

On September 21, 2010, the Company issued one investor 20 shares of common stock as further consideration for the investor to enter into a debt agreement with the Company.

On February 15, 2012, the Company issued one investor 23,530 shares of common stock as further consideration related to the prepayment of a debt agreement with the Company.

On March 28, 2012, the Company issued one investor 11,765 shares of common stock as further consideration related to the prepayment of a debt agreement with the Company.

On March 19, 2012, the Company issued one investor 29,412 shares of common stock as further consideration related to the prepayment of a debt agreement with the Company.

Issuance of Shares of Common Stock as Performance Bonus

On October 18, 2010, the Company issued an officer and director 5,883 shares of common stock as a performance bonus at a fair value of $2,650,000 ($450.50 per share), based upon the closing price of common stock on October 18, 2010.

On October 18, 2010, the Company issued an officer and director 5,883 shares of common stock as a performance bonus at a fair value of $2,650,000 ($450.50 per share), based upon the closing price of common stock on October 18, 2010.

On July 20, 2012, the Company issued officers and a director 429,973 shares of common stock as a performance bonus at a fair value of $3,758,437 ($8.74 per share), based upon the closing price of common stock on December 31, 2011.

Issuance of Shares of Common Stock to Non-Employee Directors as Initial One-Time Equity Grant

On November 16, 2012, the Company issued 353 shares of common stock to each of the three non-employee directors.

Issuance of Shares of Common Stock for Services

On the dates setSet forth below the Company issued the number of shares of common stock at the aggregate offering prices as set forth below to consultants for services rendered to the Company.

II-6

Date of Issuance Number of Shares of Common Stock
Issued (#)
  Aggregate Offering Price
($)
 
2010      
4/1  177   174,000 
5/1  141   138,000 
5/5-5/8  454   397,940 
6/28  353   309,000 
6/30-7/01  1,378   1,208,940 
7/22  29   25,000 
7/22  14   12,000 
7/29  6   3,700 
8/10  135   56,350 
8/20  3   1,275 
8/20  118   51,000 
8/25  28   11,760 
8/25  100   41,650 
9/29  59   20,900 
9/29  42   10,500 
10/5  23   9,408 
10/11  588   300,000 
10/14  41   19,250 
10/22  503   357,600 
10/26  220   150,710 
10/28  118   77,000 
11/2  41   18,200 
11/18  4,118   840,000 
12/3  24   11,000 
12/10  2,589   220,000 
12/13  1,176   60,000 
12/14  4,706   200,000 
12/14  1,176   50,000 
12/17  4,706   960,000 
12/15  1,176   80,000 
12/15  1,765   120,000 
12/15  294   20,000 
12/16  5,882   350,000 
12/22  5,882   300,000 

II-7

2011      
1/7  29   1,723 
1/7  177   10,335 
1/7  29   1,723 
2/17  177   10,335 
2/28  304   15,000 
3/31  29   1,650 
3/31  555   25,000 
3/31  268   15,000 
4/15  118   8,100 
4/30  375   15,000 
5/1  4,380   175,000 
5/31  392   15,000 
7/12  118   3,050 
8/22  441   11,250 
8/22  88   2,250 
8/30  118   2,500 
8/30  4,629   90,000 
9/6  3,043   75,000 
9/30  118   8,100 
12/7  11,429   170,000 

2012      
5/1  4,440   50,000 
5/9  5,115   50,000 
6/1  2,941   50,000 
7/10  11,765   120,000 
8/1  8,823   75,000 
8/20  2,941   25,000 
9/3  11,765   115,000 
9/14  35,358   285,519 
9/18  11,765   191,000 
10/9  2,985   16,000 
10/18  5,882   30,000 
11/19  981   5,000 

II-8

Issuance of Shares of Common Stock for Prepaid Services

On February 11, 2011, the Company issued 1,177 shares of common stock to a consultant for services to be rendered at a fair value of $78,000 ($66.30 per share), based upon the closing price on the date of issuance.

On March 9, 2011, the Company issued consultants 2,942 shares of common stock for services to be rendered at a fair value of $112,750 ($56.10 per share) based upon the closing price on the date of issuance.

On Mayis information regarding all unregistered securities sold by us since January 1, 2011, the Company issued 589 shares of common stock to a consultant for services to be rendered at a fair value of $23,500 ($39.95 per share), based upon the closing price on the date of issuance.

On April 20, 2012, the Company issued 2,353 shares of common stock to a consultant for services to be rendered at a fair value of $50,000 ($21.25 per share), based upon the closing price on the date of issuance.

On September 20, 2012, the Company issued 1,177 shares of common stock to a consultant for services to be rendered at a fair value of $10,000 ($8.50 per share), based upon contract value.

On September 18, 2012, the Company issued 5,883 shares of common stock to a consultant for services to be rendered at a fair value of $50,000 ($8.50 per share), based upon contract value.

Issuance of Shares of Common Stock for Cash

From May 1, 2010 to June 23, 2010, the Company entered into stock purchase agreements with investors for an aggregate of 741 shares of common stock at $297.50 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $315,000.

On May 25, 2010, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with an investor for 124 shares of common stock, for an aggregate purchase price of $30,000.

On July 14, 2010, the Company entered into stock purchase agreements with an investor for 76 shares of common stock, for an aggregate purchase price of $18,250.

From June 17, 2010 to November 2, 2010, the Company entered into stock purchase agreements with investors for an aggregate of 4,051 shares of common stock at $297.50 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $1,204,951.

On November 29, 2011, the Company entered into stock purchase agreements with investors for 49,412 shares of common stock, for an aggregate purchase price of $375,000.

From July 16, 2012 to August 29, 2012, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with investors for an aggregate of 161,765 shares of common stock at $8.50 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $1,375,000.

Issuance of Shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock for Cash and Services

On November 4, 2011, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with an investor for 100 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in exchange for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000.

On November 4, 2011, the Company entered into an exchange agreement with an investor for 90 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in exchange for services to be rendered at a fair value of $90,000.

II-9

Issuance of Shares of Common Stock to Settle Disputes Regarding Warrants

On August 17, 2012, the Company issued 18,100 shares of common stock to Ellis International, LP in exchange for the cancellation of a warrant to purchase common stock and entering into a settlement agreement between Ellis International and the Company.

On August 17, 2012, the Company issued 18,824 shares of common stock to JMJ Financial in exchange for the cancellation of a warrant to purchase common stock and entering into a settlement agreement between JMJ Financial and the Company.

On September 19, 2012, the Company issued 117,648 shares of common stock to Southridge Partners II, LP in exchange for the cancellation of a warrant to purchase common stock and entering into a settlement agreement between Southridge Partners and the Company.

On September 19, 2012, the Company issued 168,236 shares of common stock to Inter-Mountain Capital Corp. in exchange for the cancellation of a warrant to purchase common stock and entering into a settlement agreement between Inter-Mountain and the Company.

Series D Preferred Stock Issuances

Between January 16, 2013 and February 4, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $12 million.

Common Stock Issuances

Between October and November 2012, the Company issued 16,908 shares of common stock in accordance with consulting agreements valued at $106,200.

In December 2012, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock valued at $549,950 for interest on debt.

Between February and March 2013, the Company issued 2,352,250 shares of common stock pursuant to the conversion of 1,178,000 shares of Series D preferred stock.

In March 2013, the Company issued 142,282 shares of common stock pursuant to the ratchet provisions in the July 2012 securities purchase agreements which are valued at $853,692.

In March 2013, the Company issued an aggregate 741,017 shares of common stock pursuant consulting agreements valued at approximately $6,297,694.

In March 2013, the Company issued an aggregate 43,137 shares of common stock pursuant the vesting of stock awards valued at $294,167.

In March 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 703,236 shares of common stock through a private placement to several investors for $6,000,000.

In May 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 100,000 shares of common stock to one accredited investor for $850,000.

In June 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 150,000 shares of common stock to one accredited investor for $1,500,000.

2019. Unless otherwise stated, the salesissuances of the above securities were deemed to be exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance upon Section 4(2)4(a)(2) or 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act (oror Regulation D or Regulation S promulgated thereunder),thereunder, or Rule 701 promulgated under Section 3(b) of the Securities Act as transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering or pursuant to benefit plans and contracts relating to compensation as provided under Rule 701. The recipients

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 16,216,216 shares of common stock to Ryan Drexler, the Company’s chief executive officer, upon the conversion of an outstanding convertible promissory note.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 22,222 shares of common stock for consulting services.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 150,000 shares of common stock in relation to the Biozone settlement.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued an aggregate of 595,238 shares of restricted stock to directors.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued 702,069 shares of common stock for advertising services.

On October 4, 2019, the Company entered into a secured revolving promissory note (the “Revolving Note”) with Mr. Drexler. Under the terms of the securitiesRevolving Note, the Company can borrow up to $3.0 million.

On August 21, 2020, the Company entered into a refinancing agreement with Mr. Ryan Drexler, with an effective date of July 1, 2020. As part of the 2020 Refinancing, the Company issued to Mr. Drexler an amended and restated convertible secured promissory note (the 2020 “Refinanced Convertible Note”) in eachthe original principal amount of these transactions represented their intentions$2,735,199, which amended and restated (i) a convertible secured promissory note dated as of November 8, 2017, $1,134,483 of which was outstanding as of July 1, 2020 (ii) a collateral receipt and security agreement with Mr. Drexler dated as of December 27, 2019, $252,500 of which was outstanding as of July 1, 2020, and (iii) a secured revolving promissory note dated as of October 4, 2019, $1,348,216 of which was outstanding as of July 1, 2020.

On October 15, 2020, the Company entered into a secured revolving promissory note with Ryan Drexler, pursuant to acquirewhich the securities for investment only and not with a viewCompany could borrow up to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof, and appropriate legends were placed upon the stock certificates issued in these transactions.$3,000,000.

II-10II-2
 

Item 16.ExhibitsOn November 29, 2020, the Company entered into a refinancing agreement with Mr. Ryan Drexler (the “November 2020 Refinancing”), in which the Company issued to Mr. Drexler a convertible secured promissory note (the November 2020 “Convertible Note”) in the original principal amount of $2,871,967, which amended and restated a convertible secured promissory note dated as of August 21, 2020.

Due to economic uncertainty as a result of the ongoing pandemic (COVID-19), on May 14, 2020, the Company received an aggregate principal amount of $964,910 pursuant to the borrowing arrangement (“Note”) with Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC and agreed to pay the principal amount plus interest at a 1% fixed interest rate per year, on the unpaid principal balance. The Note includes forgiveness provisions in accordance with the requirements of the Paycheck Protection Program, Section 1106 of the CARES Act.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company issued 226,722 shares of common stock for advertising services.

On April 5, 2021, with the appointment of the Company’s President and Chief Financial Statement SchedulesOfficer, the Company granted an award where upon the occurrence of a sale of the Company, the President and Chief Financial Officer will receive 2% of the fully diluted equity of the Company. The grant will vest upon the one-year anniversary and if a sale transaction has not occurred by the two-year anniversary, then the President and Chief Financial Officer shall have the option to convert the transaction equity bonus into common shares.

On May 12, 2021, the Company issued an option to purchase 1,673,994 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price per share of $1.12 for consulting services.

On July 26, 2021, the Company entered into a Modification Agreement (the “Modification”) with Prestige Capital Finance, LLC (“Prestige”), providing a second over-advance from the purchase and sale agreement dated January 2016. In connection with the Modification, the Company granted options to Prestige to purchase 18,750 shares of the Company’s common stock.

On August 12, 2021, the Company issued an option to purchase 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for consulting services.

On August 13, 2021, the Company issued to Ryan Drexler a convertible secured promissory note (the “August 2021 Convertible Note”) in the original principal amount of $2,457,549.

On September 1, 2021, the Company issued an option to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to an employee.

    Incorporated by Reference    

Exhibit

No.

 Description Form SEC File
No.
 Exhibit Filing Date 

Filed

Herewith

 

Furnished

Herewith

               
2.1 Agreement Concerning the Exchange of Securities by and Among Tone in Twenty and Muscle Pharm, LLC and the Security Holders of Muscle Pharm, LLC, dated February 1, 2010. 8-K 000-53166 2.1 February 2, 2010    
               
3.1 Articles of Incorporation of MusclePharm Corporation (successor to Tone In Twenty). SB-2 333-147111 3.1 November 2, 2007    
               
3.2 Bylaws of MusclePharm Corporation (successor to Tone In Twenty). (Amended on March 1, 2010 to change fiscal year end to December 31 – set forth on Form 8-K filed on 03-03-2010.) SB-2 333-147111 3.2 November 2, 2007    
               
3.3 Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation. SB-2 333-147111 3.3 November 2, 2007    
               
3.4 Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation 8-K 000-53166 3.3 February 24, 2010    
               
3.5 Certificate of Designation relating to the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. 8-K 000-53166 3.4 February 24, 2010    
               
3.6 Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation. 10-Q 000-53166 3.1 May 23, 2011    
               
3.7 Certificate of Designation of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. 10-Q 000-53166 3.1 August 16, 2011    
               
3.8 Certificate of Designation of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. 8-K 000-53166 3.1 November 4, 2011    
               
3.9 Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation. 8-K 000-53166 3.1 November 23, 2011    
               
3.10 Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation. 8-K 000-53166 3.1 January 27, 2012    
               
3.11 Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation. 8-K 000-53166 3.1 March 30, 2012    
               
3.12 Certificate of Change. 8-K 000-53166 3.1 November 28, 2012    
               
3.13 Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation. 8-K 000-53166 3.2 November 28, 2012    
               
3.14 Form of Certificate of Designation of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock. S-1/A 333-184625 3.14 December 31, 2012    

On October 13, 2021, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (with certain institutional investors as purchasers (the “Investors”). Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company sold, and the Investors purchased, $7,050,000 (in principal amount of senior notes and warrants to purchase 17,355,700 shares of common stock.The Senior Notes were issued with an original issue discount of 14%, bear no interest and mature after 6 months, on April 13, 2022. To secure its obligations thereunder and under the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company has granted a security interest over substantially all of its assets to the collateral agent for the benefit of the Investors, pursuant to a pledge and security agreement.

The maturity date of the Senior Notes may be extended to May 28, 2022 if no event of default has occurred and is continuing and cash flows from operating and investing activities (but not cash flows from financing activities) of the Company and its subsidiaries was positive for March 2022 and no event of default is reasonably expected to occur on or before April 30, 2022 and the sum of cash flows from operating and investing activities (but not from financing activities) of the Company and its subsidiaries will be positive for April 2022. The maturity date of the Senior Notes also may be extended under other circumstances specified therein. If the maturity date is extended, interest will accrue on and from April 13, 2022 at 18% per annum until the Senior Notes are paid in full. The Company is undertaking various initiatives to improve gross margins to become cash flow positive prior to the maturity of the Senior Notes. These initiatives include improving cost of goods on certain raw materials., there can be no assurance the Company will be able to successfully implement such initiatives on a timely basis or at all or that it otherwise will meet the conditions required to extend the Senior Notes. If the Company is unable to extend the Senior Notes or elects not to do so, the Company will be required to repay the Senior Notes through equity issuances, additional borrowings, cash flows from operations and/or other sources of liquidity. For additional information, please refer to “Note 19 – Subsequent Events.” The Warrants are exercisable for five (5) years to purchase 17,355,700 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at an exercise price of $0.78, subject to adjustment under certain circumstances described in the Warrants. The Warrants have a face value of $4.4 million which is recorded in Additional Paid-In Capital.

II-11II-3
 

3.15 Certificate of Correction. S-1/A 333-184625 3.15 December 26, 2012    
               
4.1 Specimen of certificate for MusclePharm Corporation Series D Convertible Preferred Stock. 8-K 000-53166 4.1 January 28, 2013    
               
4.2 Specimen of certificate for MusclePharm Corporation Common Stock. S-1/A 333-184625 4.4 December 28, 2012    
               
4.3 Form of Promissory Note, dated July 13, 2012, issued by MusclePharm Corporation in favor of TCA Global Credit Master Fund LP. 8-K 000-53166 4.1 July 20, 2012    
               
4.4 Form of Promissory Note. 8-K 000-53166 4.2 December 10, 2012    
               
5.1 Opinion of Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP S-1/A 333-184626 5.1 *    
               
10.2 Order Approving Stipulation for Settlement of Claim, dated December 8, 2010, between MusclePharm Corporation and Socius CG II, Ltd. 8-K 000-53166 10.1 December 9, 2010    
               
10.3 Endorsement Agreement, dated July 20, 2011, between MusclePharm Corporation and Michael Vick, individually. 8-K 000-53166 10.1 July 22, 2011    
               
10.4 Convertible Promissory Note between MusclePharm Corporation and Brad J. Pyatt, dated November 18, 2010. S-1/A 333-176771 4.2 September 27, 2011    
               
10.5 Convertible Promissory Note between MusclePharm Corporation and Brad J. Pyatt, dated November 23, 2010. S-1/A 333-176771 4.3 September 27, 2011    
               
10.6 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated November 14, 2011, between MusclePharm Corporation and Brad J. Pyatt. 10-Q 000-53166 10.6 November 14, 2011    
               
10.7 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated November 14, 2011, between MusclePharm Corporation and Cory J. Gregory. 10-Q 000-53166 10.7 November 14, 2011    
               
10.8 Employment Agreement, dated September 15, 2011, by and between MusclePharm Corporation and John H. Bluher. 10-Q 000-53166 10.4 November 14, 2011    
10.9 Employment Agreement, dated November 14, 2011, by and between MusclePharm Corporation and Jeremy R. DeLuca. 10-Q 000-53166 10.5 November 14, 2011    
               
10.10 Securities Purchase Agreement, dated July 10, 2012, between MusclePharm Corporation and Subscribers set forth therein. 8-K 000-53166 10.1 July 19, 2012    

In conjunction with the private placement of Senior Notes and Warrants, each of the directors and officers of the Company entered into lock-up agreements, which prohibit sales of the Common Stock until after April 11, 2022, subject to certain exceptions.

On October 28, 2021, the Company issued an option to purchase 1,673,994 shares of the Company’s common stock for consulting services.

On December 22, 2021, the Company issued an option to purchase 1,811,000 shares of common stock of the Company, exercisable at a price of $0.40, to Sabina Rizvi, the President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to the 2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan.

The issuance of the Senior Notes and Warrants was made in reliance on the exemption provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), for the offer and sale of securities not involving a public offering, and Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act. In accordance with ASC 470-20-25-2, proceeds from the sale of a debt instrument with stock purchase warrants (detachable call options) are allocated to the two elements based on the relative fair values of the debt instrument without the warrants and of the warrants themselves at time of issuance. The portion of the proceeds so allocated to the warrants shall be accounted for as additional paid-in capital. The remainder of the proceeds shall be allocated to the debt instrument portion of the transaction.

As previously disclosed by MusclePharm Corporation (the “Company”) on a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on June 9, 2022 (the “June 8-K”), as of June 3, 2022, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Securities Purchase Agreement”) with certain accredited and institutional investors, including certain investors from the Company’s October 2021 private offering of securities (the “October Offering”), which amends and restates the October 2021 Securities Purchase Agreement to, among other things, allow for the issuance of additional senior secured notes and warrants.

Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Securities Agreement, on June 10, 2022, the Company sold an aggregate of $3,081,875 in principal amount 20% Original Issue Discount Senior Secured Notes (the “June Notes”), resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $2,465,500, exclusive of placement agent commission and fees and other offering expenses, and warrants (the “June Warrants”) to purchase up to 22,013,393 shares (the “Warrant Shares”) of the Company’s common stock (the “June Offering”).

Subject to certain exceptions, the June Notes accrue no interest, mature six months after issuance, or December 10, 2022, and are secured by the same collateral that secured the notes issued in the October Offering (the “October Notes” and together with the June Notes, the “Notes”). The June Warrants are exercisable for five years from the date of issuance at an exercise price of $0.231 per share, subject to adjustment. If at any time following the six-month anniversary of the date of issuance of the June Warrants, a registration statement covering the resale of the Warrant Shares is not effective, the holders may exercise the June Warrants by means of a cashless exercise. The Company is prohibited from effecting an exercise of the June Warrants to the extent that, as a result of such exercise, the holder together with the holder’s affiliates, would beneficially own more than 4.99% of the number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the issuance of the Warrant Shares upon exercise of the June Warrants.

As previously disclosed in the June 8-K, in connection with the closing of the June Offering, the Company:

amended (i) the convertible secured promissory note issued to Ryan Drexler, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board of Directors, on November 29, 2020 (as amended on August 13, 2021) in the principal amount of $2,871,967 (the “Drexler November Note”) and (ii) the convertible secured promissory note issued to Ryan Drexler on August 13, 2021 in the principal amount of $2,457,549 (the “Drexler August Note” and together with the Drexler November Note, the “Drexler Notes”) to extend the maturity date of the Drexler Notes to June 10, 2025;
entered into an amendment to Ryan Drexler’s Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated February 1, 2018 (the “Drexler Employment Agreement”) pursuant to which Mr. Drexler’s cash compensation, including base salary and bonus, was decreased to $250,000 annually while any Notes remain outstanding; and
appointed Sabina Rizvi, the Company’s President and Chief Financial Officer, as a member of the board of directors of the Company.

Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) Exhibits. The following exhibits are included herein or incorporated herein by reference:

Exhibit No.Description
1.1**Form of Underwriting Agreement.
3.1Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-147111) of the Company filed November 2, 2007 by the Company with the SEC).
3.2Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-147111) of the Company filed November 2, 2007 by the Company with the SEC).
3.3Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed February 24, 2010 by the Company with the SEC).
3.4Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed May 23, 2011 by the Company with the SEC).
3.5Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed November 23, 2011 by the Company with the SEC).
3.6Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed January 27, 2012 by the Company with the SEC).
3.7Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed March 30, 2012 by the Company with the SEC).
3.8Certificate of Change (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed November 28, 2012 by the Company with the SEC).

II-12II-4
 

10.11 Consulting Agreement, dated July 12, 2012, between MusclePharm Corporation and Melechdavid, Inc. 8-K 000-53166 10.2 July 19, 2012    
               
10.12 Consulting Agreement, dated July 12, 2012, between MusclePharm Corporation and GRQ Consultants, Inc. 8-K 000-53166 10.3 July 19, 2012    
               
10.13 Form of Committed Equity Facility Agreement, dated July 13, 2012, between MusclePharm Corporation and TCA Global Credit Master Fund LP. 8-K 000-53166 10.1 July 20, 2012    
               
10.14 Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 13, 2012, between MusclePharm Corporation and TCA Global Credit Master Fund LP. 8-K 000-53166 10.1 July 20, 2012    
               
10.15 Form of Security Agreement, dated July 13, 2012, between MusclePharm Corporation and TCA Global Credit Master Fund LP. 8-K 000-53166 10.1 July 20, 2012    
               
10.16 Form of Indemnification Agreement. 8-K 000-53166 10.1 August 27, 2012    
               
10.17 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated October 18, 2012, between MusclePharm Corporation and Brad J. Pyatt. 8-K 000-53166 10.1 October 23, 2012    
               
10.18 Employment Agreement, dated October 18, 2012, between MusclePharm Corporation and L. Gary Davis. 8-K 000-53166 10.2 October 23, 2012    
               
10.19 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated October 18, 2012, between MusclePharm Corporation and John H. Bluher. 8-K 000-53166 10.3 October 23, 2012    
               
10.20 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated October 18, 2012, between MusclePharm Corporation and Jeremy R. DeLuca. 8-K 000-53166 10.4 October 23, 2012    
               
10.21 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated October 18, 2012, between MusclePharm Corporation and Cory J. Gregory. 8-K 000-53166 10.5 October 23, 2012    
               
10.22 Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award. 8-K 000-53166 10.1 November 21, 2012    
               
10.23 Subscription Agreement dated November 30, 2012 between MusclePharm Corporation and the subscribers listed therein. 8-K 000-53166 10.1 December 10, 2012    
               
10.24 Form of Escrow Agreement. POS AM 333-184625 10.24 January 8, 2013    
3.9Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed November 28, 2012 by the Company with the SEC).
3.10Certificate of Correction (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.15 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-184625) of the Company filed December 28, 2012 by the Company with the SEC).
3.11Second Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed September 27, 2016 by the Company with the SEC).
4.1Specimen of certificate for MusclePharm Corp. common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (File No. 333-184625) of the Company filed December 28, 2012 by the Company with the SEC).
4.2Warrant, dated November 7, 2016 by and between the Company and INI Buyer, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed November 9, 2016 by the Company with the SEC).
4.3Form of Warrant for October 2021 Financing (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed October 18, 2021 by the Company with the SEC).
5.1**Opinion of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP
10.1Purchasing Agreement with General Nutrition Corporation dated December 16, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed February 24, 2010 by the Company with the SEC)
10.2Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated July 13, 2012, between MusclePharm Corporation and TCA Global Credit Master Fund LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed July 20, 2012 by the Company with the SEC)
10.3Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed August 27, 2012 by the Company with the SEC)
10.4†MusclePharm Corporation 2015 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-212576) of the Company filed July 18, 2016 by the Company with the SEC).
10.5Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement, dated June 23, 2015, between MusclePharm Corporation and Consac, LLC, an affiliate of Ryan Drexler (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed August 10, 2015 by the Company with the SEC).
10.6Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Stock dated April 21, 2016, between MusclePharm Corporation and BioZone Laboratories, Inc., BioZone Holdings, Inc. and Flavor Producers, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed April 27, 2016 by the Company with the SEC).
10.7Convertible Secured Promissory Note, dated November 8, 2016, by and between MusclePharm Corporation and Ryan Drexler (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed November 9, 2016 by the Company with the SEC).
10.8Sixth Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated November 29, 2020, by and between MusclePharm Corporation and Ryan Drexler (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed December 3, 2020 by the Company with the SEC).
10.9Settlement Agreement, dated November 7, 2016, by and among MusclePharm Corporation and F.H.G. Corporation d/b/a Capstone Nutrition, INI Parent, Inc., INI Buyer, Inc. and Medley Capital Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed November 9, 2016 by the Company with the SEC).

II-13II-5
 

10.25 Form of Subscription Agreement. 8-K 000-53166 10.1 January 28, 2013    
               
10.26 Subscription Agreement 8-K 000-53166 10.1 March 27, 2013    
               
10.27 Registration Rights Agreement 8-K 000-53166 10.2 March 27, 2013    
               
10.28 First Amendment to the Melechdavid Consulting Agreement 8-K 000-53166 10.1 April, 5, 2013    
               
10.29 First Amendment to the GRQ Consulting Agreement 8-K 000-53166 10.2 April 5, 2013    
               
23.1 Consent of EKS&H LLLP       *   
               
23.2 Consent of Berman & Company, P.A.       *   
               
23.3 Consent of Sichenzia Ross Friemdan Ference LLP S-1   5.1 *    
10.10Convertible Secured Promissory Note, dated December 7, 2015, by and between MusclePharm Corporation and Ryan Drexler (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed March 15, 2017 by the Company with the SEC).
10.11First Amendment to Convertible Secured Promissory Note, dated December 7, 2015, by and between MusclePharm Corporation and Ryan Drexler (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed March 15, 2017 by the Company with the SEC).
10.12†Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, between MusclePharm Corporation and Ryan Drexler (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed March 1, 2018 by the Company with the SEC).
10.13Small Business Administration Loan Agreement between MusclePharm Corporation and Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed March 29, 2021 by the Company with the SEC).
10.14Amended and Restated Convertible Secured Promissory Note, dated August 21, 2020 by and between MusclePharm Corporation and Ryan Drexler (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed August 20, 2020 by the Company with the SEC).
10.15Fourth Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated August 21, 2020, between MusclePharm Corporation and Ryan Drexler (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed August 20, 2020 by the Company with the SEC).
10.16Settlement Agreement, dated September 25, by and between MusclePharm Corporation and NBF Holdings Canada Inc. (Nutrablend) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed November 24, 2020 by the Company with the SEC).
10.17Secured Revolving Promissory Note, dated October 15, 2020 by and between MusclePharm Corporation and Ryan Drexler (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed October 21, 2020 by the Company with the SEC).
10.18Fifth Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated October 15, 2020 by and between MusclePharm Corporation and Ryan Drexler (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed October 21, 2020 by the Company with the SEC).
10.18Convertible Secured Promissory Note, dated December 16, 2020 by and between MusclePharm Corporation and Ryan Drexler (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed December 3, 2020 by the Company with the SEC).
10.19Sixth Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated November 29, 2020 by and between MusclePharm Corporation and Ryan Drexler (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed December 3, 2020 by the Company with the SEC).
10.20Settlement Agreement, dated November 7, 2020 by and between MusclePharm Corporation and Excelsior Nutrition, Inc. (4Excelsior) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company filed March 29, 2021 by the Company with the SEC).

*Filed herewith

II-6

10.21Letter Agreement, dated May 12, 2021 between the Company and Joseph Cannata (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed November 16, 2021 by the Company with the SEC).
10.22Form of Note issued in the October 2021 Financing (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed October 18, 2021 by the Company with the SEC).
10.23Securities Purchase Agreement, dated October 13, 2021 by and between MusclePharm Corp. and the parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed October 18, 2021 by the Company with the SEC).
10.24Pledge and Security Agreement, dated October 13, 2021 by and between MusclePharm Corp. and the parties thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company filed October 18, 2021 by the Company with the SEC).
10.25Amendment to Settlement Agreement, dated September 23, 2021 between the Company and NDF Holdings Canada Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company filed November 17, 2021 by the Company with the SEC).
10.26Amended and Restated Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 3, 2022, by and between the Company and the Subsequent Investors parties thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2022)
10.27Form of June Warrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2022)
10.28Form of June Note (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2022)
10.29Form of Waiver and Amendment (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2022)
10.30Drexler November Note, as amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2022)
10.31Drexler August Note, as amended (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2022)
10.32Amendment to Ryan Drexler’s Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated June 10, 2022 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2022)
23.1*Consent of SingerLewak LLP.
23.2*Consent of Moss Adams LLP
23.3**Consent of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
24.1Power of Attorney (included on the signature page)
107Filing Fee Table

*Filed herewith.
**To be filed by amendment.
#Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. Paltalk, Inc. hereby undertakes to furnish supplementally copies of any of the omitted schedules and exhibits upon request by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Management contract or compensatory plan arrangement.

II-7

ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS.

Item 17. Undertakings

(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

(1) Toto file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

(i) to include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act;

(ii) to reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement; and

II-14

(iii) to include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement;

provided, however,(2) that, (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii) above do not apply if the information required to be included in a post-effective amendment by those paragraphs is contained in periodic reports filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission by the registrant pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act that are incorporated by reference in the registration statement.

(2)         That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

(3) Toto remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

(4) That,that, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser:

(i)          Eachpurchaser, each prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) shall be deemed to be part of the registration statement as of the date the filed prospectus was deemed part of and included in the registration statement; and

(ii)         Each prospectus required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2), (b)(5), or (b)(7) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430B relating to an offering made pursuant to Rule 415(a)(1)(i), (vii), or (x) for the purpose of providing the information required by section 10(a) of the Securities Act of 1933430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the earlier of the date such form of prospectusit is first used after effectiveness or the date of the first contract of sale of securities in the offering described in the prospectus. As provided in Rule 430B, for liability purposes of the issuer and any person that is at that date an underwriter, such date shall be deemed to be a new effective date of the registration statement relating to the securities in the registration statement to which that prospectus relates, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such effective date,first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such effective date.date of first use.

(5)         That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities: The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:

(i)          Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;

(ii)         Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;

(iii)        The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and

II-15

(iv)        Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.

(b) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”) may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities other(other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred andor paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding,proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

(c)          The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that:

(1) for purposes of determining any liability under the Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1), or (4) or 497(h) under the Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.

(2) for purposes of determining any liability under the Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initialbona fide offering thereof.

II-16II-8
 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this registration statementRegistration Statement on Form S-1 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Denver,Las Vegas, State of Colorado,Nevada, on July 15, 2013.the 16th day of June, 2022.

MUSCLEPHARM CORPORATION
By:/s/ Brad J. PyattRyan Drexler
Name: Brad J. Pyatt  Ryan Drexler
Title: Chief Executive Officer
(Principal(Principal Executive Officer)
By:/s/ Lewis Gary Davis
Name: Lewis Gary Davis  
Title: Chief Financial Officer  
(Principal Financial Officer)
(Principal Accounting Officer)

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears belowPOWER OF ATTORNEY

Each of the undersigned officers and directors of Musclepharm Corporation. hereby constitutes and appoints Brad J. PyattRyan Drexler and Gary Davis as hisSabina Rizvi, and each of them any of whom may act without joinder of the other, the individual’s true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for himthe person and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign this registration statement of Musclepharm Corporation on Form S-1, and any other registration statement relating to the same offering (including any registration statement, or amendment thereto, that is to become effective upon filing pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended), and any and all amendments thereto (including post-effective amendments)amendments to this Registration Statement, and any subsequentthe registration statements pursuant to Rule 462 of the Securities Act of 193statement), and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises,connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that eachsaid attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of said attorney-in-factthem, or histheir substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this registration statement on Form S-1Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities held and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Brad J. PyattRyan DrexlerCo-Chairman, Chief Executive Officer President and DirectorJuly 15, 2013June 16, 2022
Brad J. PyattRyan Drexler(Principal Executive OfficerOfficer)
/s/ L. Gary DavisSabina RizviPresident and Chief Financial OfficerJune 16, 2022
Sabina Rizvi(Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer)July 15, 2013
L. Gary DavisPrincipal Accounting Officer
/s/ Paul KarrDirectorJune 16, 2022
Paul Karr
/s/ *Michael HellerExecutive Vice-President and Chief Marketing OfficerDirectorJuly 15, 2013June 16, 2022
Jeremy DeLucaMichael Heller
/s/ *Co-Chairman and Executive Vice PresidentJuly 15, 2013
John H. Bluher

II-17
II-9

/s/ *Executive Vice PresidentJuly 15, 2013
Cory Gregory
/s/ *DirectorJuly 15, 2013
Donald Prosser 
/s/ *DirectorJuly 15, 2013
Michael J Doron
/s/ *DirectorJuly 15, 2013
James J.Greenwell

* Brad Pyatt - Attorney in Fact

II-18