As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17 , 20173, 2021

 

Registration No. 333-  215682         

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549333-252199

 

 

 

AMENDMENT NO.1UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

AMENDMENT NO. 2

TO

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

InspireMD, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware 3841 26-2123838
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

 

4 Menorat Hamaor St.

Tel Aviv, Israel 6744832
(888) 776-6804

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

 

James Barry, Ph.D.Marvin Slosman
President and Chief Executive Officer
InspireMD, Inc.
4 Menorat Hamaor St.

Tel Aviv, Israel 6744832
(888) 776-6804

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

 

Copies of all communications, including communications sent to agent for service, should be sent to:

 

Rick A. Werner,David S. Glatt, Adv.

Jonathan M. Nathan, Adv.

Meitar | Law Offices
16 Abba Hillel Road
Ramat Gan 5250608, Israel
Tel: +972 (3) 610-3100

Gary Emmanuel, Esq.


Mark Selinger, Esq.

Haynes and Boone,McDermott Will & Emery LLP

30 Rockefeller Plaza, 26thFloor340 Madison Ave.

New York, NY 10173

Tel: (212) 547-5400

Spencer G. Feldman, Esq.

Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP

1325 Avenue of the Americas

New York, 10112NY 10019

Tel.Tel: (212) 659-7300451-2300
Fax (212) 884-8234

Ralph V. De Martino
Cavas S. Pavri
Schiff Hardin LLP
901 K Street NW Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20001
Phone (202) 778-6400
Fax: (202) 778-6460

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

 

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box. [X]

 

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [  ]

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [  ]

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):Act:

 

Large accelerated filer [  ]Accelerated filer [  ]
Non-accelerated filer [  ][X]Smaller reporting company [X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Emerging Growth company [  ]

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. [  ]

Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered(1) Proposed Maximum
Aggregate Offering
Price
  Amount of
Registration Fee(2)
 
Units consisting of: $7,500,000.00  $869.25 
(i)Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value per share     (3)
(ii)Warrants to purchase shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value per share (4)     (5)
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share, issuable upon conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock     (3)
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share, issuable upon exercise of warrants included in the units (6) $16,875,000.00  $1,955.81 
Placement Agent’s Warrant        
Warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock included in Placement Agent Warrant(7)     (5)
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, issuable upon exercise of warrants included in Placement Agent Warrant(7) $468,750.00  $54.33 
Total $24,843,750.00  $2,879.39(8)

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered 

Proposed Maximum

Aggregate Offering

Price (1)

  

Amount of

Registration Fee

 
Units, each consisting of one share of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share and one Series G Warrant to purchase one-half of one share of common stock (2) $17,250,000(3) $1,881.98 
(i) Common stock included in the units (4)        
(ii) Series G Warrants to purchase one-half of one share of common stock included in the units (4)        
Pre-funded units, each consisting of one pre-funded warrant to purchase one share of common stock and one Series G Warrant to purchase one-half of one share of common stock (2) $(5) $ 
(i) Pre-funded warrants included in the pre-funded units (4)        
(ii) Series G Warrants to purchase one-half of one share of common stock included in the pre-funded units (4)        
Shares of common stock underlying pre-funded warrants included in the pre-funded units (2)(4)        
Shares of common stock underlying Series G Warrants included in the units and the pre-funded units $9,487,500(6) $1,035.09 
Underwriter’s Warrants (7)(8) $948,750  $103.41 
Common stock issuable upon exercise of the Underwriter’s warrants (8)        
Total: $27,686,250(9) $3,020.48(10)

(1)Pursuant toIn accordance with Rule 416416(a) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, , this registration statementthe Registrant is also covers anyregistering hereunder an indeterminate number of additional shares of common stock that mayshall be offered or issued in connection with anyissuable pursuant to Rule 416 to prevent dilution resulting from stock split,splits, stock dividenddividends or similar transaction.transactions.
  
(2)Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The fee table assumesproposed maximum aggregate offering price of $10.00 per unit.the units proposed to be sold in the offering will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis based on the aggregate offering price of any pre-funded units offered and sold in the offering, and the proposed maximum aggregate offering price of the pre-funded units to be sold in the offering will be reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis based on the aggregate offering price of any units sold in the offering. Accordingly, the proposed maximum aggregate offering price of the units and pre-funded units (including the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants included in the pre-funded units), if any, is $15,000,000, or $17,250,000 if the underwriter’s option to purchase additional units consisting of shares of common stock and Series G Warrants to purchase additional shares of common stock is exercised in full.
  
(3)Includes the aggregate offering price of additional shares of common stock and Series G Warrants to purchase additional shares of common stock that the underwriter has the option to purchase, if any. See “Underwriting” for additional information.
(4)No additional registration fee is requiredpayable pursuant to Rule 457(i) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
  
(4)(5)No additional registration fee is payable for the offering of the pre-funded units, since, as described in footnote (2) above, the amount of (i) shares of common stock underlying pre-funded warrants, and (ii) Series G Warrants, being offered in pre-funded units will reduce, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, the amount of (a) shares of common stock, and (b) Series G Warrants, being offered in units— for which the registration fee is being paid in full.   
(6)The maximum aggregate offering price for the common stock underlying Series G Warrants included in the units and the pre-funded units (including units that may be purchased by the underwriter pursuant to its option to purchase additional units consisting of additional shares of common stock and Series G Warrants to purchase additional shares of common stock) was calculated to be $9,487,500, which is equal to 110% of $8,625,000 (which is equal to 50% of $17,250,000), since each share of common stock or each pre-funded warrant will receive a warrant to purchase one-half of one share of common stock.
(7)Represents warrants to purchase a number of shares of common stock equal to 5.0% of the number of shares of common stock sold in this offering (including the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants included in the units will consistpre-funded units) at an exercise price equal to 110% of two separate classes of warrants, with each unit allocated an equal number of warrants of each such class, as described in this registration statement.the offering price per unit.
  
(5)(8)No additional registration fee is requiredpayable pursuant to Rule 457(g) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
  
(6)Each unit will include(9)Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Includes the aggregate offering price of (i) a five-year warrant to purchase 4additional shares of common stock at an assumed initial exercise price of $3.13 per share, and (ii) a six-month warrantSeries G Warrants to purchase 4additional shares of common stock at an assumed initial exercise price of $2.50 per share, based on an assumed offering price of $10.00 per unit and an assumed Series C Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price of $2. 50 per share of common stock.
(7)Represents a placement agent warrantthat the underwriter has the right to purchase, up to 5% of the number ofas well as (ii) all shares of common stock underlying the securities sold in this offering (including the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of thepre-funded warrants and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock but excluding any shares of common stock underlying the warrants issued in this offering) at an exercise price equal to 125% of the conversion price of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock.G Warrants being offered.
  
(8)(10)$2,868.53 3,020.48 of which has been previously paid.

 

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

 

 
 

 

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell nor does it seek an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

 

PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION 

DATED FEBRUARY 17 February 3, 2017

2021

 

         19,677,292 Units (each Unit contains One Share of Common Stock and One Series G Warrant to purchase One-Half of One Share of Common Stock)

 

InspireMD, Inc.           19,677,292 Pre-funded Units (each Pre-funded Unit contains One Pre-funded Warrant to Purchase One Share of Common Stock and One Series G Warrant to purchase One-Half of One Share of Common Stock)

 

750,000 Units

Each Consisting of 1 Share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock

One Warrant to Purchase 4 Shares of Common Stock

and

One Short-Term Warrant to Purchase 4 Shares of Common Stock

 3,000,000 Shares of Common Stock Underlying the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock

3,000,000Shares of Common Stock Underlying the Warrants

3,000,000 Shares of Common Stock Underlying the Short-Term Warrants

 

We are offering up to 750,00019,677,292 units with each(each unit consisting of (i) one share of our common stock and/or one Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock ”), (ii) a five-year warrant (the “Series BG Warrant ”) to purchase 4one-half of one share of our common stock) pursuant to this prospectus. Each Series G Warrant contained in a unit has an exercise price of $0.84 per share of common stock. The Series G Warrants contained in the units will be exercisable immediately and will expire five years from the date of issuance. We are also offering the shares of our common stock and (iii) a six-month warrant (the “Series C Warrant” andthat are issuable from time to time upon exercise of the Series G Warrants contained in the units.

We are also offering to each purchaser whose purchase of units in this offering would otherwise result in the purchaser, together with its affiliates and certain related parties, beneficially owning more than 4.99% (or, at the Series B Warrants,election of the “Warrants”purchaser, 9.99%) of our outstanding common stock immediately following the consummation of this offering, the opportunity to purchase, 4 sharesif the purchaser so chooses, pre-funded units (each pre-funded unit consisting of one pre-funded warrant to purchase one share of our common stock (andand/or one Series G Warrant to purchase one-half of one share of our common stock) in lieu of units that would otherwise result in the purchaser’s beneficial ownership exceeding 4.99% of our outstanding common stock (or at the election of the purchaser, 9.99%). Because we will issue a Series G Warrant as part of each unit or pre-funded unit, the number of Series G Warrants sold in this offering will not change as a result of a change in the mix of the units and pre-funded units sold. Each pre-funded warrant contained in a pre-funded unit will be exercisable for one share of our common stock. The purchase price of each pre-funded unit will equal the price per unit being sold to the public in this offering, minus $0.001, and the exercise price of each pre-funded warrant included in the pre-funded unit will be $0.001 per underlying share. The pre-funded warrants will be immediately exercisable and may be exercised at any time until all of the pre-funded warrants are exercised in full. This offering also relates to the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of any pre-funded warrants contained in the pre-funded units sold in this offering. Each Series G Warrant contained in a pre-funded unit has an exercise price of $0.84 per share of common stock. The Series G Warrants contained in the pre-funded units will be exercisable immediately and will expire five years from the date of issuance. We are also offering the shares of our common stock that are issuable from time to time upon conversion of the Preferred Stock and the shares of common stock upon exercise of the Warrants). We currently estimate thatSeries G Warrants contained in the initial exercise price forpre-funded units.

For each pre-funded unit we sell, the Series B Warrantsnumber of units we are offering will be equal to 125% ofdecreased on a one-for-one basis. Units and the conversion price of the Preferred Stock and that the initial exercise price for the Series C Warrants will be equal to the conversion price of the Preferred Stock. Unitspre-funded units will not be issued or certificated .certificated. The shares of Preferred Stockcommon stock or pre-funded warrants, as the case may be, and the Series G Warrants will be issued separately butincluded in the units or the pre-funded units, can only be purchased together in this offering. Each Warrantoffering, but the securities contained in the units or pre-funded units will be issued separately and will be immediately exercisable.separable upon issuance. The final breakdown between units and pre-funded units will be determined upon the establishment of the final public offering price and immediately prior to the execution of the underwriting agreement.

Any purchaser that purchases in this offering in excess of $250,000 of units or pre-funded units, as a condition to such purchase, will be required to execute an investor agreement pursuant to which they will (i) agree to vote the shares of our common stock that they own or control on the record date of our next stockholder meeting (which we anticipate will be on or about the date of the closing of this offering, with the stockholder meeting occurring within 60 days after the record date) in favor of approval to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, as amended, to effect the Planned Reverse Split (as described herein); and (ii) agree to certain limitations on sales of our common stock that they own or control during the period from the effective date of this registration statement until sixty days thereafter.

 

Our common stock is traded on the NYSE MKTAmerican under the symbol “NSPR,“NSPR.andOn January 26, 2021, the last reported sale price of our warrants sold in ourcommon stock was $0.7623 per share. We have assumed a public offering that closed on July 7, 2016 (the “Series A Warrants”), are tradedprice of $0.7623 per unit, the last reported sale price for our common stock as reported on the NYSE MKT underAmerican on January 26, 2021, and $0.7623 per pre-funded unit. The public offering price per unit and per pre-funded unit will be determined between us and the symbol “NSPR.WS.”underwriter based on market conditions at the time of pricing, and may be at a discount to the current market price of our common stock. Therefore, the assumed public offering price used throughout this prospectus may not be indicative of the final offering price, and the exercise price of the Series G Warrants may also change accordingly. There is no established public trading market for the pre-funded warrants or the Series G Warrants, and we do not expect a market to develop. We do not intend to apply for listing of either the Preferred Stockpre-funded warrants or the Series G Warrants on any securities exchange or other nationally recognized trading system. Without an active trading market, the liquidity of the pre-funded warrants and we do not expect that the Preferred Stock or theSeries G Warrants will be quoted on the NYSE MKT. On February 15 , 2017, the last reported sale price of our common stock and our Series A Warrants as reported on the NYSE MKT was $2.35 per share and $0.59 per warrant.limited.

We have retained Dawson James Securities, Inc. to act as placement agent in connection with this offering and to use its “best efforts” to solicit offers to purchase the units . We have agreed to pay the placement agent a cash fee equal to 8.0% of the gross proceeds of the offering and 5.0% of the proceeds from the exercise of the Series C Warrants . There are no minimum purchase requirements. We may not sell the entire amount of the securities being offered pursuant to this prospectus. The placement agent is not purchasing or selling any securities pursuant to this offering, nor are we requiring any minimum purchase or sale of any specific number of securities. Because there is no minimum offering amount required as a condition to the closing of this offering, the actual public offering amount, placement agent fees and proceeds to us are not presently determinable and may be substantially less than the maximum amounts set forth below. See “Plan of Distribution” beginning on page 107 of this prospectus for more information regarding these arrangements.

 

Investing in our Preferred Stock and Warrants (and the common stock underlying such securities)securities involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 89 of this prospectus before makingfor a decision to purchasediscussion of risks that should be considered in connection with an investment in our securities.

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined ifpassed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus is truthful or complete.prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

  

Per Unit

Per Pre-

Funded
Unit

  Total 
Public offering price $     $$ 

Placement agent feesUnderwriting discounts and commissions(1)

 $   $$ 
Proceeds, before expenses, to us $   $$ 

 

(1)

In addition, we have agreed

See “Underwriting” beginning on page 108 of this prospectus for a description of the compensation payable to reimburse the placement agent for certain offering-related expenses and to issue the placement agent or its designees warrants to purchase common stock. See “Plan of Distribution” for more information.

underwriter.

 

Because thereThe offering is no minimum offering amount required asbeing underwritten on a conditionfirm commitment basis. We have granted a 45-day option to closingthe underwriter to purchase up to           units consisting of           additional shares of common stock and/or            Series G Warrants from us solely to cover over-allotments, if any. If the underwriter exercises this offering, we may sell fewer than all ofoption in full, the securities offered hereby, which may significantly reduce the amount of proceeds received by us,total underwriting discounts and investors in this offering will not receive a refund in the event that we do not sell an amount of securities sufficient to pursue the business goals outlined in this prospectus. In addition, because there is no escrow account and no minimum offering amount in this offering, investors could be in a position where they have invested in our company, but we are unable to fulfill our objectives due to a lack of interest in this offering. Also, any proceeds from the sale of securities offeredcommissions payable by us will be available for our immediate use, despite uncertainty about whether we would be able$_________, and the total proceeds to use such funds to effectively implement our business plan. See “Risk Factors” for more information. The offeringus, before expenses, will be terminated by March 31, 2017, and may not be extended.$_________.

Affiliates and associated persons of Dawson James Securities, Inc. may invest in this offering on the same terms and conditions as the public investors participating in this offering.

 

The placement agentunderwriter expects to deliver our securities to purchasers in the securities against payment in New York, New Yorkoffering on or about        , 2017.2021.

 

DAWSON JAMES SECURITIES, INC.A.G.P.

 

The date of this prospectus isProspectus dated      , 20172021

 

 
 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 Page
Prospectus Summary1
Risk Factors89
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward LookingForward-Looking Statements2935
Use of Proceeds30
Price Range of Our Common Stock3236
Dividend Policy3237
Capitalization3338
Dilution40
Information regarding the Market for our Common Stock3441
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation3741
Business4852
Management6677
Executive Compensation7081
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions8588
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management8688
Material U.S. Federal Tax Consequences8790
Description of Securities9496
Plan of DistributionUnderwriting107
Legal Matters110112
Experts110112
Where You Can Find Additional Information110
Incorporation of Certain Information by Reference111
Index to financial statementsF-1112

  

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have notNeither we nor the underwriter has authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. WeNeither we nor the underwriter are not making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.

 

Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this prospectus concerning our industry and the markets in which we operate, including our general expectations and market position, market opportunity and market share, is based on information from our own management estimates and research, as well as from industry and general publications and research, surveys and studies conducted by third parties. Management estimates are derived from publicly available information, our knowledge of our industry and assumptions based on such information and knowledge, which we believe to be reasonable. Our management estimates have not been verified by any independent source, and we have not independently verified any third-party information. In addition, assumptions and estimates of our and our industry’s future performance are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in “Risk Factors.” These and other factors could cause our future performance to differ materially from our assumptions and estimates. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

 

This prospectus contains references to our trademarks and service marks and to those belonging to other entities. Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this prospectus may appear without the® orTM symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights or the rights of the applicable licensor to these trademarks and trade names. We do not intend our use or display of other companies’ trade names, trademarks or service marks to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, any other companies.

 

i
 

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information contained in greater detail elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary may not contain all of the information that you should consider before investing in our securities. You should read this entire prospectus carefully, including the information discussed under “Risk Factors” and our financial statements, before making an investment decision. In this prospectus, unless the context requires otherwise, all references to “we,” “our” and “us” refer to InspireMD, Inc., a publicly-traded Delaware corporation, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including InspireMD Ltd.

Overview

We are a medical device company focusing on the development and commercialization of our proprietary MicroNet™ stent platform technology for the treatment of complex vascular and coronary disease. A stent is an expandable “scaffold-like” device, usually constructed of a metallic material, that is inserted into an artery to expand the inside passage and improve blood flow. Our MicroNet, a micron mesh sleeve, is wrapped over a stent to provide embolic protection in stenting procedures.

Our CGuard™ carotid embolic prevention system (“CGuard EPS”) combines MicroNet and a self-expandable nitinol stent in a single device for use in carotid artery applications. Our CGuard EPS received CE mark approval in the European Union in March 2013 and was fully launched in Europe in September 2015. Subsequently, we launched CGuard EPS in Russia and certain countries in Latin America and Asia, including India. In September, 2020, we launched CGuard EPS in Brazil after receiving regulatory approval in July 2020, and we are seeking strategic partners for a potential launch of CGuard EPS in Japan and China.

On September 8, 2020, we received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) of our Investigation Device Exemption (“IDE”), thereby allowing us to proceed with a pivotal study of our CGuard™ Carotid Stent System, CARENET-III, for prevention of stroke in patients in the United States. CARENET-lll is a multicenter, single-arm, pivotal study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the CGuard™ Carotid Stent System when used to treat symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting. For additional information about the CARENET-III pivotal study, please see “Business – Overview”.

With the proceeds of this offering, we intend to continue to invest in current and future potential product and manufacturing enhancements for CGuard EPS that are expected to reduce cost of goods and/or provide the best-in-class performing delivery system. In furtherance of our strategy that focuses on establishing CGuard EPS as a viable alternative to vascular surgery, we are exploring adding new delivery systems and accessory solutions for procedural protection to our portfolio.

We cannot give any assurance that we will receive sufficient (or any) proceeds from future financings or the timing of such financings, if ever, for potential product enhancements and manufacturing enhancements. In addition, such additional financings may be costly or difficult to complete. Even if we receive sufficient proceeds from future financings, there is no assurance that we will be able to timely apply for CE mark approval following our receipt of such proceeds. We believe these improvements may allow us to reduce our cost of goods and increase penetration in our existing geographies and better position us for entry into new markets.

Our Products and Market

We consider the addressable market for our CGuard EPS to be individuals with diagnosed, symptomatic high-grade carotid artery stenosis (HGCS, ≥70% occlusion) for whom an intervention is preferable to medical (drug) therapy. This group includes not only carotid artery stenting patients but also individuals undergoing carotid endarterectomy, as the two approaches compete for the same patient population. Assuming full penetration of the intervention caseload by CGuard EPS, we estimate that the addressable market for CGuard EPS was approximately $1.0 billion in 2017 (source: Health Research International 2017 Results of Update Report on Global Carotid Stenting Procedures and Markets by Major Geography and Addressable Markets).

Our MGuard™ Prime™ embolic protection system (“MGuard Prime EPS”) is marketed for use in patients with acute coronary syndromes, notably acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) and saphenous vein graft coronary interventions (bypass surgery). MGuard Prime EPS combines MicroNet with a bare-metal cobalt-chromium based stent. MGuard Prime EPS received CE mark approval in the European Union in October 2010 for improving luminal diameter and providing embolic protection. However, as a result of a shift in industry preferences away from bare-metal stents in favor of drug-eluting (drug-coated) stents, in 2014 we decided to curtail further development of this product in order to focus on the development of a drug-eluting stent product, MGuard DES™. Due to limited resources, however, our efforts have been limited to testing drug-eluting stents manufactured by potential partners for compatibility with MicroNet and seeking to incorporate MicroNet onto a drug-eluting stent manufactured by a potential partner. The FDA has clarified that the primary mode of action for drug-eluting cardiovascular stents, which are regulated as combination products, is that of the device component and has assigned the FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) primary responsibility for premarket review and regulation, providing some clarity about what to expect regarding the regulatory framework related to the development of MGuard DES™.

We also intend to develop a pipeline of other products and additional applications by leveraging our MicroNet technology to new applications to improve peripheral vascular and neurovascular procedures, such as the treatment of the superficial femoral artery disease, vascular disease below the knee and neurovascular stenting to seal aneurysms in the brain.

Presently, none of our products may be sold or marketed in the United States.

Our Growth Strategy

Our primary business objective is to utilize our proprietary MicroNet technology and products to become the industry standard for treatment of stroke, complex vascular and coronary disease and to provide a superior solution to the common acute problems caused by current stenting procedures, such as restenosis, embolic showers and late thrombosis. We are pursuing the following business strategies to achieve this objective.

Widen the adoption of CGuard EPS. We are seeking to expand the population of CGuard EPS patients in those countries in which CGuard EPS is commercially available. In particular, our focus is on establishing CGuard EPS as a primary alternative (in appropriate cases) to conventional carotid artery stents and vascular surgery within the applicable medical communities. We intend to accomplish this goal by continuing to publish and present our clinical data and support investigator-initiated clinical registries. We have partnered and will continue to seek strategic partnerships with organizations focused on the therapies of stroke prevention. We will also continue to engage advisory boards and to develop a network of key opinion leaders to assist us in our efforts to widen the adoption of CGuard EPS.
   

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights selected information contained in greater detail elsewhere in this prospectus or incorporated by reference into this prospectus. This summary may not contain all of the information that you should consider before investing in our securities . You should read this entire prospectus carefully, including the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and our historical financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus before making an investment decision. In this prospectus, unless the context requires otherwise, all references to “we,” “our” and “us” refer to InspireMD, Inc., a publicly traded Delaware corporation, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including InspireMD Ltd., unless the context requires otherwise.

Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus reflects a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of our common stock that occurred on October 1, 2015, a 1-for-25 reverse stock split of our common stock that occurred on October 7, 2016, and a 1-for-25 reverse stock split of our Series A Warrants that occurred on November 7, 2016.

Overview

We are a medical device company focusing on the development and commercialization of our proprietary MicroNet™ stent platform technology for the treatment of complex vascular and coronary disease. A stent is an expandable “scaffold-like” device, usually constructed of a metallic material, that is inserted into an artery to expand the inside passage and improve blood flow. Our MicroNet, a micron mesh sleeve, is wrapped over a stent to provide embolic protection in stenting procedures.

Our CGuard™ carotid embolic prevention system (“CGuard EPS”) combines MicroNet and a self-expandable nitinol stent in a single device for use in carotid artery applications. Our CGuard EPS received CE mark approval in the European Union in March 2013, and we launched its release on a limited basis in October 2014. In January 2015, a new version of CGuard, with a rapid exchange delivery system, received CE mark approval in Europe and in September 2015, we announced the full market launch of CGuard EPS in Europe. Subsequently, we launched CGuard EPS in Argentina and Colombia, and have received regulatory approval to commercialize CGuard EPS in Russia. If we receive sufficient proceeds from the exercise of the Series C Warrants, we plan to develop CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter (5 French gauge), which we intend to submit for CE mark approval within three calendar quarters of receiving such proceeds. We believe that CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter will enable us to meet the market demand for minimally invasive devices, have a competitive advantage in penetrating the Asia Pacific market and offer our product for transradial catheterization, which, we believe, is gaining favor among interventionalists. We cannot give any assurance that we will receive sufficient (or any) proceeds from the exercise of the Series C Warrants or the timing of receipt of such proceeds, if ever. We cannot predict when or if the Series C Warrants will be exercised. It is possible that the Series C Warrants may expire and may never be exercised.

Our MGuard™ Prime™ Embolic Protection System (“MGuard Prime EPS”) is marketed for use in patients with acute coronary syndromes, notably acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) and saphenous vein graft coronary interventions (bypass surgery). MGuard Prime EPS combines MicroNet with a bare-metal cobalt-chromium based stent and, together with our first generation MGuard stent combining MicroNet with a bare-metal stainless steel stent, unless otherwise indicated, we refer to both kinds of bare-metal stents as our MGuard coronary products. We market and sell MGuard Prime EPS for the treatment of coronary disease in the European Union. MGuard Prime EPS received CE mark approval in the European Union in October 2010 for improving luminal diameter and providing embolic protection. However, as a result of a shift in industry preferences away from bare-metal stents in favor of drug-eluting (drug-coated) stents, in 2014 we decided to curtail further development of this product in order to focus on the development of a drug-eluting stent product, MGuard DES™. Due to limited resources, though, our efforts have been limited to testing drug-eluting stents manufactured by potential partners for compatibility with MicroNet and seeking to incorporate MicroNet onto a drug-eluting stent manufactured by a potential partner.

We are also developing a neurovascular flow diverter (“NGuard”), which is an endovascular device that directs blood flow away from cerebral aneurysms in order to ultimately seal the aneurysms. Our flow diverter would utilize an open cell, highly flexible metal scaffold to which MicroNet would be attached. We have completed initial pre-clinical testing of this product in both simulated bench models and standard in vivo pre-clinical models. However, as we plan to focus our resources on the further expansion of our sales and marketing activities for CGuard EPS and MGuard Prime EPS and, provided that we have sufficient resources, the development of CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter (5 French gauge) and its submission for CE mark approval, we do not intend to resume further development of NGuard until at least the third quarter of 2018.

We also intend to develop a pipeline of other products and additional applications by leveraging our MicroNet technology to new applications to improve peripheral vascular and neurovascular procedures, such as the treatment of the superficial femoral artery disease, vascular disease below the knee and neurovascular stenting to open diseased vessels in the brain.

Presently, none of our products may be sold or marketed in the United States.

During the first quarter of 2015, we implemented a cost reduction/focused spending plan.The plan had four components: (i) reducing headcount; (ii) limiting the focus of clinical and development expenses to only carotid and neurovascular products; (iii) limiting sales and marketing expenses to those related to the CGuard EPS stent launch; and (iv) reducing all other expenses (including conferences, travel, promotional expenses, executive cash salaries, director cash fees, rent, etc.). In addition, we decided to alter our commercial strategy by using third party distributors to drive future sales, as opposed to direct sales to hospitals and clinics, which had previously been our focus. However, we have decided to shift our commercial strategy to focus on direct sales of our products through our own internal sales initiatives as well as through distribution partners. In addition, we have begun to participate in international trade shows and industry conferences in an attempt to gain market exposure and brand recognition.

Recent Developments

On July 7, 2016, we closed a public offering of 442,424 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Series A Warrants to purchase up to 1,769,696 shares of common stock. Each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the accompanying Series A Warrants were sold at a price of $33.00. Each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into 4 shares of common stock reflecting a conversion price equal to $8.25 per share. The holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive cumulative dividends at the rate per share of 15% per annum of the stated value for five years, payable in cash or common stock, at our discretion. The Series A Warrants are exercisable immediately and have a term of exercise of five years from the date of issuance and have an exercise price of $5.00 per share of common stock. The Series A Warrants commenced trading on the NYSE MKT under the ticker symbol “NSPR.WS” on August 1, 2016. We received gross proceeds of approximately $14.6 million from the offering, before deducting placement agent fees and offering expenses payable by us.

Growth Strategy

Our primary business objective is to utilize our proprietary technology to become the industry standard for treatment of complex vascular and coronary disease and to provide a superior solution to the common acute problems caused by current stenting procedures, such as restenosis, embolic showers and late thrombosis. We are pursuing the following business strategies in order to achieve this objective.

 Grow our presence in existing and new markets for CGuard EPS. We have fully launched CGuard EPS in most European and Latin American countries through a combination ofcomprehensive distributor sales organizations.organizations network. We are continuing to focus on larger growing markets through this network by supporting our distributors with comprehensive marketing and clinical education programs. In July 2020, we obtained approval for registration for CGuard EPS in Brazil and in September 2020 launched the product. We are also pursuing additional product registrations and distribution contracts with local distributors in other countries in Europe, Asia and Latin America. We are also evaluating having a direct sales model in certain key markets.
   
 Continue to leverage our MicroNet technology to develop additional applications for interventional cardiologists and vascular surgeons.In addition to the applications described above, we believe that we will eventually be able to utilize our proprietary MicroNet technology to address imminent market needs for new product innovations in embolic prevention to significantly improve patients’ care. We continue to broadly develop and protect intellectual property usingrelated to our mesh technology. Examples of some areas include peripheral vascular disease, neurovascular disease, renal artery disease and bifurcation disease.

 Establish relationships with collaborative and development partners to fully develop and market our existing and future products.We are seeking strategic partners for collaborative research, development, marketing, distribution, or other agreements, which could assist with our development and commercialization efforts for CGuard EPS and NGuard, as well as future efforts with MGuard Prime EPS, MGuard DES, and other potential products that are based on our MicroNet technology.
 ContinuePortfolio expansion and pipeline development We will continue to protect and expandinvest in advancing our portfolio of patents. Our MicroNet technology andwith new delivery system alternatives to facilitate the use of patents to protect it are critical to our success. We own numerous patentsCGuard by all physicians. Our delivery systems will enable all endovascular access points including accessory devices for our MicroNet technology. Twelve separate patent applications have been filed in the United States, some of which have corresponding patent applications and/or issued patents in Canada, China, Europe, Israel, India, and South Africa. We believe these patents and patent applications collectively cover all of our existing products, and may be useful for protecting our future technological developments. We intend to aggressively continue patenting new technology, and to actively pursue any infringement covered by any of our patents. We believe that our patents, and patent applications once allowed, are important for maintaining the competitive differentiation of our products and maximizing our return on research and development investments.Arterial Venous (AV) shunting.

Recent Developments

Distribution and Purchase Agreement with Chinese Partners

On February 3, 2021, we entered into a Distribution Agreement with three China-based partners, pursuant to which the Chinese partners will be responsible for conducting the necessary registration trials for commercial approval of our products in China, followed by an eight-year exclusive distribution right to sell our products in China with the term of the agreement continuing on a year-to-year basis unless terminated. Under the Distribution Agreement, the China-based partners will be subject to minimum purchase obligations. The Distribution Agreement may be terminated for cause upon failure to meet minimum purchase obligations, failure to obtain regulatory approvals or for other material breaches.

In addition, and on the same day, we entered into an investment transaction with one of the Chinese parties to the Distribution Agreement, QIDI Asia Medical Limited, a Hong Kong limited company, or QIDI, which included (i) a Securities Purchase Agreement, or the SPA, pursuant to which QIDI agreed to invest $900,000 in exchange for shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.6708 per share, and (ii) an Investor Rights Agreement, or the IRA, whereby QIDI was provided certain customary registration rights, including a commitment by us to file a registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on Form S-1 or Form S-3 and have such registration statement become effective not later than 150 days following the closing of the transactions under the SPA.

The transactions are expected to close this month.

Sixth Amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan

Effective as of August 31, 2020, our stockholders approved the Sixth Amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and, accordingly, increased the number of shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”) available for issuance pursuant to awards under such Plan by 6,500,000 shares, to a total of 7,178,395 shares of Common Stock.

Regained Compliance with New York Stock Exchange

On August 7, 2019, we received a notification from the NYSE American that we did not meet the continued listing standards of the NYSE American as set forth in Part 10 of the NYSE American Company Guide (the “Company Guide”). Specifically, we were not in compliance with Section 1003(a)(iii) of the Company Guide because we reported stockholders’ equity of less than $6 million as of September 30, 2019, and net losses in our five most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2018. As a result, we became subject to the procedures and requirements of Section 1009 of the Company Guide. On October 11, 2019, the NYSE American accepted our plan to regain compliance with Section 1003(a)(iii) of the Company Guide by August 7, 2020.

On August 7, 2020, following our submission to the NYSE American of our plan for regaining compliance, the NYSE American approved such plan and, accordingly and as of such date, we are compliant with all of the NYSE American LLC continued listing standards set forth in Part 10 of the NYSE American Company Guide. In particular, we regained compliance with the continued listing requirement under NYSE American Company Guide Section 1003(a)(iii). The return to compliance was achieved as a result of our recently-consummated public offering, in which we raised approximately $10.7 million of net proceeds from the sale of units and pre-funded units.

FDA Approval of IDE

On September 8, 2020, we received approval from the FDA of our IDE, thereby allowing us to proceed with a pivotal study of our CGuard™ Carotid Stent System, CARENET-III, for prevention of stroke in patients in the United States.

ATM Offering

On July 28, 2020, we entered into a Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners, as sales agent (“A.G.P.”), pursuant to which we may offer and sell, from time to time, at our option, through or to A.G.P., up to an aggregate of approximately $9,300,000 of shares of Common Stock (the “ATM Facility”). Any shares to be offered and sold under the Sales Agreement will be issued and sold pursuant to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-223130), filed with the SEC on February 21, 2018 and the prospectus supplement thereto filed with the SEC on July 28, 2020, by methods deemed to be an “at the market offering” as defined in Rule 415(a)(4) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or if specified by us, by any other method permitted by law. On January 11, 2021, we increased the aggregate amount of our shares of common stock that may be sold under the Sales Agreement from $9,300,000 to $10,382,954, and, as a result, utilized and sold the maximum amount allowable under the ATM Facility, which resulted in an aggregate amount of $10,381,958.

Public Offerings

On June 5, 2020, we closed an underwritten public offering of (i) 7,635,800 units (“Units”), with each Unit being comprised of one share of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and one Series F warrant (a “Series F Warrant”) to purchase one share of common stock, and (ii) 14,586,400 pre-funded units (the “Pre-Funded Units”), with each Pre-Funded Unit being comprised of one pre-funded warrant (a “Pre-Funded Warrant”) to purchase one share of common stock and one Series F Warrant. In connection with this public offering, the underwriter exercised the option practically in full, for 3,333,300 shares of common stock and 3,333,300 Series F Warrants. The offering price to the public was $0.45 per Unit and $0.449 per Pre-Funded Unit. The net proceeds to the Company from the offering and the exercise of the underwriter’s over-allotment option were approximately $10.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and payment of other estimated expenses associated with the offering, but excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of Series F Warrants and the Pre-Funded Warrants sold in the offering.

 3 
Resume development and successfully commercialize MGuard DES. While we have limited the focus of product development to carotid and neurovascular products, if we resume development of our coronary products, we plan to evaluate opportunities to further develop MGuard DES.
   

Registration Clearance for CGuard™ MicroNet® in Brazil

On July 23, 2020, we announced that we obtained registration from the Brazilian registration authority, Agéncia Nacional de Vigiláncia Sanitária (ANVISA), for our CGuard MicroNet covered stent, clearing it for sale and distribution in Brazil.

New Trial Results for CGuard EPS

On June 10, 2020, we reported the publication of the results of our PARADIGM trial in the EuroIntervention journal. In that trial, 101 unselected consecutive real-life patients were treated with our CGuard MicroNET covered stent for carotid stenosis and were monitored for postprocedural neurologic events for a period of 12 months. The results displayed sustained protection against any such neurologic events. At 30 days, only one adverse event occurred (a minor transient stroke with no other strokes, myocardial infarctions, or deaths). Furthermore, those study results showed that no strokes occurred between 30 days and twelve months.

On June 25, 2020, we reported the results from an investigator-initiated SIBERIA randomized clinical trial of our CGuard EPS, which evaluated 30-day silent brain infarcts associated with the use of the Acculink™ conventional open-cell nitinol stent vs. our CGuard Micronet-covered stent. Those results displayed that CGuard had a statistically significant (greater than three-fold) reduction in the procedure-generated mean cerebral lesion volume relative to Acculink. At 30 days, there were zero new cerebral lessons in the CGuard arm, compared to six in the Acculink arm, also statistically significant.

On September 3, 2020 we reported the award for Best ESC Congress Poster for the presentation of updated data from the large, long-term PARADIGM-EXTEND study of the CGuard™ Embolic Prevention System (EPS), as part of the European Society of Cardiology 2020 Carotid Update e-presentation at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress 2020. PARADIGM/EXTEND is an investigator-driven on-going study performed with CGuard Carotid stent for primary and secondary stroke prevention in a large, consecutive all-comers population, with 5 years (60 months) follow-up. The results for 480 patients of the expected total of 550 that completed the 30-day follow-up were presented were no peri-procedural major strokes or death. The total death/stroke /myocardial incidence at 30 days was 1.04% (5/480) due to two minor strokes, one myocardial infarction and two stent-unrelated deaths. In the study, 354/480 patients completed the 12-month follow-up with only 1 patient experiencing in-stent restenosis, 0.28% (1/354). At the 12-month follow-up there were no other device-related adverse clinical events. Finally, 46/480 patients completed the 60-month follow-up period with one more case of in-stent restenosis and no additional cases of device-related stroke.

Appointment of Dr. Gary Roubin, M.D. to our Board of Directors

On October 12, 2020, our board of directors, or the Board, appointed Dr. Gary S. Roubin as a Class I member of the Board, effective as of that date, with a term expiring at the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders. Dr. Roubin is an internationally renowned interventional cardiologist recognized for his pioneering work in carotid stenting and embolic and protection devices. He is also acknowledged for the development of coronary stenting and the first FDA-approved coronary stent. In connection with his appointment, Dr. Roubin was granted options to purchase 79,650 shares of common stock and 238,950 shares of restricted stock. Shortly after his appointment as a director, and on October 16, 2020, Dr. Roubin invested $100,000 in the Company in exchange for 222,223 units consisting of (i) one share of common stock and (ii) one warrant to purchase our common stock with an exercise price of $0.495. For additional biographical information about Dr. Roubin, please see “Management” herein.

COVID-19 Developments

In an effort to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19, which the World Health Organization, or WHO, declared to be a pandemic on March 12, 2020, many countries have imposed unprecedented restrictions on travel, quarantines and other public health safety measures. As of the beginning of the second quarter of 2020, we began to experience a significant COVID-19 related impact on our financial condition and results of operations, which we primarily attribute to the postponement of CGuard EPS procedures (non-emergency procedures), as hospitals shifted resources to patients affected by COVID-19. To our knowledge, most European countries in which we operate are slowly reinstating elective procedures, but we do not know when the hospitals will resume to normal pre-pandemic levels with such procedures in light of recent increases in COVID-19 cases in the territories we sell into. We anticipate that the continuation of the pandemic and related restrictions and safety measures would likely result in continued fluctuations in sales of our products for the upcoming periods.

In response to significant market volatility and uncertainties relating to COVID-19, the fees and salaries of our Board, management and most of our employees were reduced in order to alleviate corporate operating expenses.

Effective April 1, 2020, the Board approved a 50% decrease in the annual cash compensation for non-employee directors from an aggregate amount of $154,000 to $77,000.

On April 21, 2020, Marvin Slosman, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, signed a waiver reducing his monthly base salary from $33,333 to $16,666 for the period beginning April 1, 2020 and ending on such date as Mr. Slosman was to determine, and Craig Shore, our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, Secretary and Treasurer, signed a waiver reducing his monthly base salary from NIS 80,125 to NIS 40,063 for the period beginning April 1, 2020 and ending on such date as Mr. Shore was to determine.

Effective April 1, 2020, we reduced the annual salaries of most of our employees by 20% to 30% until further notice.

Based on a determination made by each of Mr. Slosman and Mr. Shore on June 10, 2020, following the closing of our underwritten public offering in June 2020, as described above, each of Mr. Slosman’s and Mr. Shore’s monthly base salaries were reinstated to $33,333 and NIS 80,125, respectively, effective as of June 1, 2020. Each of the salaries for the remaining officers, directors and employees was similarly reinstated by no later than June 30, 2020.

As a result of the reduction of those fees and salaries during the second quarter of 2020, our operating expenses were reduced by approximately $235,000 in the second quarter of 2020.

Release from Former Underwriter

The terms of our engagement of the underwriter for our September 2019 financing contained a purported 12 month right of first refusal in favor of such underwriter with respect to future financings. Due to, among other things, difficulties in the relationship with that prior underwriter and our need to raise additional funds to finance our ongoing operations, we engaged A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners in May 2020 as underwriter for our June 2020 public offering, and again in July 2020 for an At-the-market offering (ATM).

On July 28, 2020, we entered into a settlement agreement and release with that prior underwriter, under which it provided us a final, unconditional release from any further obligations arising out of or related to the engagement agreements, underwriting agreements and placement agency agreements which we had been party to with it and with respect to any services which it had provided to us. We, in turn, provided the prior underwriter a final, unconditional release from any further obligations arising out of or related to the prior agreements and services.

As consideration for the final release provided to us, we paid to the prior underwriter $400,000 in cash and reduced, to $0.495, the exercise price per share of warrants to purchase 274,029 shares of our common stock that had been issued by us to the prior underwriter in various offerings that took place between March 2018 and September 2019. That reduced exercise price represents the exercise price for the Series F Warrants that we issued in our June 2020 public offering. The warrants that were repriced had existing exercise prices per share ranging from $187.50 to $2.25 and a weighted average exercise price per share of $7.32. All other terms of those warrants remained unchanged. The related increase in expenses of $400,000 was recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2020 to “General and Administrative expense” within the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

 25
  

 

Risks Associated with Our Business

 

Our ability to operate our business and achieve our goals and strategies is subject to numerous risks, as discussed more fully in the section titled “Risk Factors,” including, without limitation:

 

 our history of recurring losses and negative cash flows from operating activities, significant future commitments and the uncertainty regarding the adequacy of our liquidity to pursue our complete business objectives, and substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern;
   
 

our need to raise additional capital to meet our business requirements in the future and such capital raising may be costly or difficult to obtain and could dilute our stockholders’ ownership interests;

   
 our ability to generate revenues from our products and obtain and maintain regulatory approvals for our products;products, specifically in connection with our planned pivotal clinical trial for our CGuard EPS, including but not limited to the FDA’s IDE regulations;
the impact of the recent COVID-19 outbreak on our manufacturing, sales, business plan and the global economy;
potential delays or failures of clinical trials, primarily in connection with our pivotal clinical trial for CGuard EPS, could prevent us from commercializing our products, which would materially and adversely affect our results of operations and the value of our business;
delisting of our common stock from the NYSE American;
   
 our ability to adequately protect our intellectual property;
   
 our dependence on a single manufacturing facility and our ability to comply with stringent manufacturing quality standards and to increase production as necessary;
   
 the risk that the data collected from our current and planned clinical trials may not be sufficient to demonstrate that our technology is an attractive alternative to other procedures and products;
   
 market acceptance and adoption of our products;
   
 intense competition in our industry, with competitors having substantially greater financial, technological, research and development, regulatory and clinical, manufacturing, marketing and sales, distribution and personnel resources than we do;

 entry of new competitors and products and potential technological obsolescence of our products;
   
 loss of a key customer or supplier;

 technical problems with our research and products and potential product liability claims;
   
 adverse economic conditions;
   
 insufficient or inadequate reimbursement by governmental and other third party payers for our products;
   
 adverse federal, state and local government regulation in the United States, Europe, Israel and other foreign jurisdictions;
   
 price increases for supplies and components;
   
 inability to carry out research, development and commercialization plans; and
   
 loss or retirement of key executives and research scientists.

Corporate Information

We were organized in the State of Delaware on February 29, 2008. Our principal executive offices are located at 4 Menorat Hamaor St., Tel Aviv, Israel 6744832. Our telephone number is (888) 776-6804 . Our website address iswww.inspire-md.com. Information accessed through our website is not incorporated into this prospectus and is not a part of this prospectus.

 

The Offering6

Corporate Information

We were organized in the State of Delaware on February 29, 2008. Our principal executive offices are located at 4 Menorat Hamaor St., Tel Aviv, Israel 6744832. Our telephone number is (888) 776-6804. Our website address is www.inspire-md.com. Information accessed through our website is not incorporated into this prospectus and is not a part of this prospectus.

THE OFFERING

 

Units offered by us: 19,677,292 units, each consisting of one share of our common stock and/or one Series G Warrant to purchase one half of one share of our common stock.
   
IssuerPre-funded units offered by us: InspireMD, Inc.We are also offering to each purchaser whose purchase of units in this offering would otherwise result in the purchaser, together with its affiliates and certain related parties, beneficially owning more than 4.99% (or, at the election of the purchaser, 9.99%) of our outstanding shares of common stock immediately following the consummation of this offering, the opportunity to purchase, if the purchaser so chooses, pre-funded units (each pre-funded unit consisting of one pre-funded warrant to purchase one share of common stock and/or one Series G Warrant to purchase one share of common stock) in lieu of units that would otherwise result in the purchaser’s beneficial ownership exceeding 4.99% (or, at the election of the purchaser, 9.99%) of our outstanding shares of common stock. The purchase price of each pre-funded unit will equal the public offering price at which the units are being sold to the public in this offering, minus $0.001, and the exercise price of each pre-funded unit will be $0.001 per share. The pre-funded warrants included in the pre-funded units are exercisable immediately and may be exercised at any time until all of the pre-funded warrants are exercised in full. This offering also relates to the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of any pre-funded warrants sold in this offering. For each pre-funded unit we sell, the number of units we are offering will be decreased on a one-for-one basis. Because we will issue a Series G Warrant as part of each unit or pre-funded unit, the number of Series G Warrants sold in this offering will not change as a result of a change in the mix of the units and pre-funded units sold.
   
SecuritiesSeries G Warrants offered by us in this offeringUp to 750,000 units, with each unit consisting of(i) one share of Preferred Stock, (ii) a Series B Warrant to purchase 4 shares of our common stock, and (iii) a Series C Warrant to purchase 4 shares of our common stock (3,000,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Stock , 3,000,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the Series B Warrants, and 3,000,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the Series C Warrants).(1)
Conversion

ThePreferred Stock is convertible into shares of our common stock at an assumed conversion price equal to $2.50(1) , subject to adjustment as provided in the certificate of designation, at any time at the option of the holder, provided that the holder will be prohibited from converting Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock if, as a result of such conversion, the holder, together with its affiliates, would own more than 4.99% of the total number of shares of our common stock then issued and outstanding. However, any holder may increase or decrease such percentage to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%, provided that any increase in such percentage shall not be effective until 61 days after such notice to us.

The Preferred Stock, to the extent that it has not been converted previously, is subject to full ratchet anti-dilution price protection upon the issuance of equity or equity-linked securities at an effective common stock purchase price of less than the conversion price then in effect, subject to adjustment as provided in the certificate of designation.
Liquidation preferenceIn the event of our liquidation, dissolution, or winding up, holders of our Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive the amount of cash, securities or other property to which such holder would be entitled to receive with respect to such shares of Preferred Stock if such shares had been converted to common stock immediately prior to such event (without giving effect for such purposes to any beneficial ownership limitation), subject to the preferential rights of holders of any class or series of our capital stock specifically ranking by its terms senior to the Preferred Stock as to distributions of assets upon such event, whether voluntarily or involuntarily.
Voting RightsThe holders of the Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except as required by law. Any amendment to our certificate of incorporation, bylaws or certificate of designation that adversely affects the powers, preferences and rights of the Preferred Stock requires the approval of the holders of a majority of the shares of Preferred Stock then outstanding.
DividendsThe holders of our Preferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends on shares of Preferred Stock equal (on an as-if-converted-to-common-stock basis) to and in the same form as dividends actually paid on shares of the common stock when such dividends are specifically declared by our board of directors. Our loan and security agreement with Hercules Capital, Inc. (formerly Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc.) (“Hercules”), dated October 23, 2013, as amended, prohibits us from paying cash dividends or distributions on our capital stock.

Series B Warrants

offering:
 

Series BG Warrants to purchase upan aggregate of 9,838,646 shares of common stock. Each unit and each pre-funded unit includes one Series G Warrant to 3,000,000 sharespurchase one-half of one share of our common stock. Each Series BG Warrant will have an exercise price per share of not less than 110% of the public offering price, will be immediately exercisable for 4 shares of common stock, have an assumed initial exercise price of $3.13 per share of common stock (which is 125% of the assumed Preferred Stock conversion price of $2.50 per share of common stock) , and will expire after five years fromon the date of issuance. We, with the consentfifth anniversary of the warrant holders holding all of the then outstanding Series B Warrants, may increase the exercise price, shorten the expiration date and amend all other warrant terms. We may lower the exercise price or extend the expiration date without the consent of investors. See “Description of Securities” for more information.original issuance date. This prospectus also relates to the offering of the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Series BG Warrants.

   
Series C WarrantsOption to purchase additional securities: Series C WarrantsThe underwriter has an option to purchase up to 3,000,000 shares2,951,594 additional units, consisting of our common stock. Each Series C Warrant will be immediately exercisable for 42,951,594 shares of common stock have an assumedand/or 2,951,594 Series G Warrants, from us at the public offering price, less underwriting discounts and commissions. The underwriter may exercise price of $2.50 per share of common stock (which is the assumed Preferred Stock conversion price of $2.50 per share of common stock),this option at any time and will expire after six monthsfrom time to time within 45 days from the date of issuance. We, with the consent of the warrant holders holding all of the then outstanding Series C Warrants, may increase the exercise price, shorten the expiration date and amend all other warrant terms. We may lower the exercise price or extend the expiration date without the consent of investors. See “Description of Securities” for more information. This prospectus also relates to the offering of the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Series C Warrants.this prospectus.
   
Common stock outstanding prior to this offering: Common stock outstanding71,455,570
immediately before this offering

1,472,606 shares as of February 15, 2017.

common stock.
   

Common stock outstanding
immediately after this offering
offering:

 91,132,862 9,488,094 shares (assuming sale of all units covered by this prospectus, conversion of 750,000 shares of Preferred Stock included in the units into 3,000,000 shares of common stock, assuming sale of the maximum number of units offered and no exercisesale of anypre-funded units (or up to 94,084,456 shares of common stock if the Warrants includedunderwriter exercises in thefull its option to purchase additional units, assuming no sale of pre-funded units).(1)(2)
   
Use of proceedsInvestor Agreement We estimate

Any purchaser that our net proceeds frompurchases in this offering in excess of $250,000 of units or pre-funded units, as a condition to such purchase, will be approximately $6,642,500 after deducting estimated placement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses payable by us (assumingrequired to execute an investor agreement pursuant to which they will (i) agree to vote the saleshares of all units covered by this prospectus and no exerciseour common stock that they own or control on the record date of anyour next stockholder meeting (which we anticipate will be on or about the date of the Warrants includedclosing of this offering, with the stockholder meeting occurring within 60 days after the record date) in favor of approval to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, as amended, to effect the units).(1)

Planned Reverse Split; and (ii) agree to certain limitations on sales of our common stock that they own or control during the period from the effective date of this registration statement until sixty days thereafter.

   
Use of Proceeds: We planintend to use the net proceeds from the sale of the units in this offering to further fund our anticipated pivotal clinical trials in connection with our CGuard™ Carotid Stent System, CARENET-III for the expansionprevention of our sales and marketing activities for CGuard EPS and MGuard Prime EPS. If we receive sufficient proceeds fromstroke caused by carotid artery disease (CAD) including the exercisecosts of the Series C Warrants, we plan to continue the development ofproducing and manufacturing the product required for the trial and enhancements to our manufacturing and quality systems for CGuard EPSpurposes of compliance with FDA Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and further our efforts to obtain an Investigational Device Exemption (“IDE”) approval for CGuard EPS . Any balance of the net proceeds will be used forworking capital and general corporate purposes. See “Use of Proceeds.”
Dividend policyPolicy: We have not declared or paid any cash or other dividends on our capitalcommon stock, and we do not expect to declare or pay any cash or other dividends in the foreseeable future other than on the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. Our loan and security agreement with Hercules, dated October 23, 2013, as amended, prohibits us from paying cash dividends or distributions on our capital stock.future. See “Dividend Policy.”
   
Risk factorsFactors: You should carefully read and consider the informationInvesting in our securities involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 89 of this prospectus set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” and all other information set forth in this prospectus and the documents incorporated herein and therein by reference before deciding to invest in our Preferred Stock and Warrants.prospectus.
   
NYSE MKTAmerican symbol for common
stock and publicly traded warrants
stock:
 Our common stock is traded“NSPR.” We do not plan to list the pre-funded warrants or the Series G Warrants on the NYSE MKT under the symbol “NSPR,” and our Series A Warrants are traded on the NYSE MKT under the symbol “NSPR.WS.” Neither the Preferred Stock nor the Warrants will be listed on the NYSE MKTAmerican or any other securities exchange or trading market. There is no established trading market for the Preferred Stockpre-funded warrants or the Warrants. WeSeries G Warrants, and we do not expect any sucha trading market to develop fordevelop. Without a trading market, the Preferred Stock orliquidity of the Warrants.
pre-funded warrants and the Series G Warrants will be extremely limited.

Following the consummation of this offering, we plan to effect a reverse split of our common stock, or the Planned Reverse Split, and, accordingly, share amounts, per share data, share prices, exercise prices or conversion rates in this prospectus are subject to change following the effectiveness of the Planned Reverse Split. The Planned Reverse Split will not change the authorized number of shares or the par value of our common stock. The number of shares of common stock to be outstanding immediately after this offering, which number does not account for the Planned Reverse Split, is based on 71,455,570 shares of our common stock outstanding as of January 26, 2021, and excludes, as of such date:

 17, 077,825 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants, with an exercise price ranging from $0.495 to $32,266 per share and having a weighted average exercise price of $2.57 per share;

 (1)

 Based on an assumed offering price3,112,923 shares of $10.00 per unit and an assumedcommon stock issuable upon conversion of the outstanding Series B Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price(the “Series B Preferred Stock”) (including the payment of $2.50 per sharethe cumulative dividends accrued on the Series B Preferred Stock in an aggregate of 1,334,110 shares of common stock.

(2)Includes the issuance of 5,015,488stock but excluding additional shares of common stock that we will be required to issue to the holders of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon conversion of shares of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock based on 311,521 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of February 15 , 2017, anbecause the effective assumed public offering price of $10.00 per unit and an assumed Preferred Stock conversion price of $2.50 per share of common stock (see “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Organization and Our Common Stock, Preferred Stock, Warrants and this Offering—Because the effective common stock purchase price in this offering is lesslower than $0.321 per share), at the currentconversion price of $0.321 per share and the stated value per share of $33.00
46,714 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the outstanding Series BC Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price(the “Series C Preferred Stock”) (excluding additional shares of $8.25,common stock that we will be required to issue additional shares of common stock to the holders of our Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the certificate of designation for the Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock which will be dilutive to allbecause the effective assumed public offering price of our other stockholders, including new investorscommon stock in this offering”).

The number of shares to be outstanding immediately before and immediately after this offering is based on 1,472,606 shareslower than $0.321 per share) at the conversion price of our common stock$0.321 per share and 311,521 sharesthe stated value per share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of February 15 , 2017, and excludes as of that date:

$6.40;

 3,6601,396,277 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrantsoptions, with anexercise prices ranging from $0.001 to $3,675,000 and having a weighted average exercise price of $1,800.00$39 per share;
   
 2,640182,381 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants with an exercise price of $750.00 per share;Restricted Stock Units outside our 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan;
   
 6741,175,287 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants with an exercise price of $742.50 per share;Restricted Stock Units under our 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and
   
 12,531 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants to purchase one-half of one share of common stock with an exercise price for two warrants of $437.50 per full share;
137,484 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants with an exercise price of $137.50 per share;
58,668 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants with an exercise price of $14.75 per share;
5,867 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants with an exercise price of $18.44 per share;
38,691 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants issued to Hercules on June 13, 2016, with an exercise price of $4.71 per share;
1,246,084 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of the currently outstanding Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and payment of all dividends accrued on the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock in an aggregate of 934,563 shares of common stock upon conversion of currently outstanding Series B Convertible Preferred Stock at the conversion price of $8.25 per share and the stated value per share of $33.00;
1,769,696 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding Series A Warrants with an exercise price of $5.00 per share;
123,880 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and exercise of the Series A Warrants included in the unit purchase option that we issued to the placement agent in the public offering that closed on July 7, 2016;
46,455 shares of common stock issuable as cumulative dividends upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock included in the unit purchase option that we issued to the placement agent in the public offering that closed on July 7, 2016;

249,309 shares of common stock that we will be required to issue to the placement agent upon conversion of shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, based on an assumed offering price of $10.00 per unit and an assumed Preferred Stock conversion price of $2.50 per share of common stock, included in the unit purchase option that we issued to the placement agent in the public offering that closed on July 7, 2016 (see “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Organization and Our Common Stock, Preferred Stock, Warrants and this Offering—Because the effective common stock purchase price in this offering is less than the current Series B Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price of $8.25, we will be required to issue additional shares of common stock to the holders of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, which will be dilutive to all of our other stockholders, including new investors in this offering”);

150,000shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants that we have agreed to issue to the placement agent or its designees in this offering, assuming the sale of all units covered by this prospectus, at a price per share equal to 125% of the of the conversion price of the Preferred Stock;

333,401 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding options with exercise prices ranging from $0.0001 to $2,100.00 and having a weighted average exercise price of $27.85 per share;

1,714 shares of common stock available for future issuance under our 2011 UMBRELLA Option Plan; and

239,9012,222,963 shares of common stock available for future issuance under our 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

Unless otherwise stated, all information contained in this prospectus assumes no exercise of the Warrants issued in this offering.

 

Except as otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus assumes no exercise of the underwriter’s option to purchase additional units, consisting of additional shares and/or additional Series G Warrants, and no sale of pre-funded warrants in this offering, which, if sold, would reduce the number of shares of common stock that we are offering on a one-for-one basis.

RISK FACTORS

 

An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. Before deciding whether to invest in our securities, you should consider carefully the risks described below, together with other information in this prospectus and the informationinformation. You should also consider the risks, uncertainties and documents incorporated by reference,assumptions discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” included in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K and in any free writing prospectusother reports that we have authorized for usefile with the SEC which are on file with the SEC, and which may be amended, supplemented or superseded from time to time by subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or other reports we file with the SEC in connection with this offering.the future. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flow could be seriously harmed. This could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline, resulting in a loss of all or part of your investment. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently see as immaterial, may also harm our business. Please also read carefully the section below entitledtitled “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

 

Summary Risk Factors

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those highlighted in the section titled “Risk Factors” immediately following this prospectus summary. These risks include, among others, the following:

the COVID-19 pandemic has caused interruptions or delays of our business plan and may have a significant adverse effect on our business;

we have a history of net losses and may experience future losses;
the report of our independent registered public accounting firm contains an explanatory paragraph as to our ability to continue as a going concern, which could prevent us from obtaining new financing on reasonable terms or at all.;

we will need to raise additional capital to meet our business requirements in the future, and such capital raising may be costly or difficult to obtain and could dilute our stockholders’ ownership interests;

we may become subject to claims by much larger and better capitalized competitors enforcing their intellectual property rights against us or seeking to invalidate our intellectual property or our rights thereto;

there are inherent limitations in all control systems, and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected;
clinical trials necessary to support a pre-market approval application will be lengthy and expensive and will require the enrollment of a large number of patients, and suitable patients may be difficult to identify and recruit. Any such delay or failure of clinical trials could prevent us from commercializing our stent products, which would materially and adversely affect our results of operations and the value of our business;

our products may in the future be subject to product notifications, recalls, or voluntary market withdrawals that could harm our reputation, business and financial results;

completing clinical trials for CGuard EPS in the United States require meeting a number of regulatory requirements and must be conducted in compliance with the FDA’s IDE regulations. Failure to maintain compliance with IDE regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business;

though necessary to pursue FDA premarket approval, pre-clinical and clinical trials are inherently lengthy and expensive and subject to any number of regulatory and/or clinical difficulties that can cause further delays, additional costs, and/or rejection by the FDA, and any such delay, added cost, or failure in connection with any future clinical trials could prevent us from commercializing our MicroNet products in the United States, which would materially and adversely affect our results of operations and the value of our business;

we may be subject, directly or indirectly, to applicable U.S. federal and state anti-kickback, false claims laws, physician payment transparency laws, fraud and abuse laws or similar healthcare and security laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings;

we may be exposed to product liability claims and insurance may not be sufficient to cover these claims;

even if one or more of our products are approved by the FDA, we may fail to obtain an adequate level of reimbursement for our products by third party payors, such that there may be no commercially viable markets for our products or the markets may be much smaller than expected;

in the United States and European Union, our business could be significantly and adversely affected by healthcare reform initiatives and/or other legislation or judicial interpretations of existing or future healthcare laws and/or regulations;

if we are unable to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection covering our products, others may be able to make, use or sell our products, which would adversely affect our revenue;

we are an international business, and we are exposed to various global and local risks that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations venue;

the market prices of our common stock and our publicly traded warrants are subject to fluctuation and have been and may continue to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses for investors;

our common stock could be delisted from the NYSE American if we fail to meet the NYSE American’s stockholders’ equity continued listing standards. Our ability to publicly or privately sell equity securities and the liquidity of our common stock could be adversely affected if we are delisted from the NYSE American;

a low trading price could lead the NYSE American to take actions toward delisting our common stock, including immediately suspending trading in our common stock;

if you purchase our securities sold in this offering you may experience immediate dilution in your investment as a result of this offering;

if the effective price per share of common stock included in the units being offered in this offering or issuable upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants included in the pre-funded units being offered in this offering is less than the respective current conversion price of our Series B or Series C Preferred Stock, we will be required to issue additional shares of common stock, as applicable, to the holders of the preferred stock, which will be dilutive to all of our other stockholders, including new investors in this offering;

10

purchasers in this offering may experience additional dilution of their investment in the future;

offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our publicly traded securities to decline;

our management team may invest or spend the proceeds of this offering in ways with which you may not agree or in ways which may not yield a significant return;

there is no public market for the pre-funded warrants or the Series G Warrants being offered by us in this offering;

holders of pre-funded warrants or Series G Warrants purchased in this offering will have no rights as common stockholders until such holders exercise their pre-funded warrants or Series G Warrants and acquire our common stock;

we anticipate being subject to fluctuations in currency exchange rates because we expect a substantial portion of our revenues will be generated in Euros and U.S. dollars, while a significant portion of our expenses will be incurred in New Israeli Shekels;

if there are significant shifts in the political, economic and military conditions in Israel and its neighbors, it could have a material adverse effect on our business relationships and profitability;

it may be difficult for investors in the United States to enforce any judgments obtained against us or some of our directors or officers;

Risks Related to Our Business

 

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused interruptions or delays of our business plan and may have a significant adverse effect on our business.

In an effort to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19, a strain of coronavirus which the World Health Organization, or WHO, declared to be a pandemic on March 12, 2020, many countries have imposed unprecedented restrictions on travel, quarantines and other public health safety measures. At this point, the extent to which COVID-19 may impact our business cannot be estimated; however, procedures with CGuard EPS, which are generally scheduled or non-emergency procedures, have mostly been postponed as hospitals shift resources to patients affected by COVID-19, and it is highly plausible that this trend will continue. We anticipate that the continuation of the pandemic and related restrictions and safety measures would likely result in continued fluctuations in sales of our products for the upcoming periods.

Certain component parts of our delivery system are sourced from countries that have been impacted by COVID-19, and the continued pandemic and spreading of COVID-19 may adversely impact our suppliers and in turn our manufacture of CGuard EPS. Although the manufacturing of our products in Israel has not been materially impacted by COVID-19 as of January 2021, we cannot guarantee that we will continue to manufacture at full capacity in the event that pandemic persists and further restrictions are imposed.

The extent to which COVID-19 will impact our results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the coronavirus. the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, the efficacy and scale of the various vaccines currently deployed across the world, among others. Moreover, COVID-19 has had indeterminable adverse effects on general commercial activity and the world economy, and our business and results of operations could be adversely affected to the extent that COVID-19 or any other epidemic continues to harm the global economy generally.

We have a history of net losses and may experience future losses.

 

We have yet to establish any history of profitable operations. We reported a net loss of $8.5$6.7 million for the fiscal yearnine months ended December 31, 2016September 30, 2020, and had a net loss of approximately $15.6$10 million during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.2019. As of December 31 , 2016,September 30, 2020, we had an accumulated deficit of $132$164 million. We expect to incur additional operating losses for the foreseeable future. ThereFurthermore, the clinical trials necessary to support our anticipated growth will be expensive and lengthy. Our strategic plan will require a significant investment in clinical trials, product development and sales and marketing programs, which may not result in the accelerated revenue growth that we anticipate. As a result, there can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve sufficientever generate substantial revenues throughout the year or be profitable in the future.sustain profitability.

 

The report of our independent registered public accounting firm contains an explanatory paragraph as to our ability to continue as a going concern, which could prevent us from obtaining new financing on reasonable terms or at all.

Because we have had recurring losses and negative cash flows from operating activities, substantial doubt exists regarding our ability to remain as a going concern at the same level at which we are currently performing .performing. Accordingly, the report of Kesselman & Kesselman, our independent registered public accounting firm, with respect to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 ,2019, includes an explanatory paragraph as to our potential inability to continue as a going concern. The doubts regarding our potential ability to continue as a going concern may adversely affect our ability to obtain new financing on reasonable terms or at all.

 

We will need to raise additional capital to meet our business requirements in the future, and such capital raising may be costly or difficult to obtain and could dilute our stockholders’ ownership interests.

 

InWithout materially curtailing our operations, we estimate that we have sufficient capital to fund operations until the fourth quarter of 2022. As such, in order for us to fully realize all ofpursue our business objectives, we will need to raise additional capital, following the completion of this offering, which additional capital may not be available on reasonable terms or at all. For instance, we will need to raise additional funds to accomplish the following:

 

 

developmentfurthering our efforts to ultimately seek the FDA’s approval for commercial sales of our current and future products, including CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter;

in the United States;
   
 

development of our current and future products, including CGuard EPS enhancements;

pursuing growth opportunities, including more rapid expansion and funding regional distribution systems ;

systems;
   
 making capital improvements to improve our infrastructure;
   
 hiring and retaining qualified management and key employees;
   
 responding to competitive pressures;
   
 complying with regulatory requirements such as licensing and registration; and
   
 maintaining compliance with applicable laws.

Any additional capital raised through the sale of equity or equity-backed securities may dilute our stockholders’ ownership percentages and could also result in a decrease in the market value of our equity securities.

 

The terms of any securities issued by us in future capital transactions may be more favorable to new investors, and may include preferences, superior voting rights and the issuance of warrants or other derivative securities, which may have a further dilutive effect on the holders of any of our securities then outstanding.

Furthermore, any additional debt or equity financing that we may need may not be available on terms favorable to us, or at all. In connection withThe respective certificate of designation for our Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock contains a full ratchet anti-dilution price protection to be triggered upon issuance of equity or equity-linked securities at an effective common stock purchase price of less than the conversion price in effect. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Securities and this offering, we will enter into a placement agency agreement with Dawson James Securities, Inc., which will contain a restriction on salesOffering— If the effective price per share of common stock included in the units being offered …” Such obligations may make any additional financing difficult to obtain or unavailable to us while any shares of our capital stock by us for a period of 90 days after the date of the placement agency agreement, which restriction may be waived by Dawson James Securities, Inc., at any time, in its sole discretion.Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock are outstanding. If we are unable to obtain such additional financing on a timely basis, we may have to curtail our development activities and growth plans and/or be forced to sell assets, perhaps on unfavorable terms, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, and ultimately could be forced to discontinue our operations and liquidate, in which event it is unlikely that stockholders would receive any distribution on their shares. Further, we may not be able to continue operating if we do not generate sufficient revenues from operations needed to stay in business.

 

In addition, we may incur substantial costs in pursuing future capital financing, including investment banking fees, legal fees, accounting fees, securities law compliance fees, printing and distribution expenses and other costs. We may also be required to recognize non-cash expenses in connection with certain securities we issue, such as convertible notes and warrants, which may adversely impact our financial condition. If we do not have a sufficient number of available shares for any Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock conversions or upon conversion of Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, we will be required to increase our authorized shares, which may not be possible and will be time consuming and expensive.

We operate in an intensely competitive and rapidly changing business environment, and there is a substantial risk our products could become obsolete or uncompetitive.

The medical device market is highly competitive. We compete with many medical device companies globally in connection with our current products and products under development. We face intense competition from numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in the therapeutics area, as well as competition from academic institutions, government agencies and research institutions. Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific Corporation, Medtronic, Inc., and Johnson and Johnson, Gore Medical and Terumo Medical Corporation produce a polytetrafluoroethylene mesh-covered stent and a double layer metal stent, respectively. Most of our current and potential competitors, including but not limited to those listed above, have, and will continue to have, substantially greater financial, technological, research and development, regulatory and clinical, manufacturing, marketing and sales, distribution and personnel resources than we do. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient resources to successfully commercialize our products, if and when they are approved for sale. The worldwide market for stent products is characterized by intensive development efforts and rapidly advancing technology. Our future success will depend largely upon our ability to anticipate and keep pace with those developments and advances. Current or future competitors could develop alternative technologies, products or materials that are more effective, easier to use or more economical than what we or any potential licensee develop. If our technologies or products become obsolete or uncompetitive, our related product sales and licensing revenue would decrease. This would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

The voluntary field actionWe may become subject to claims by much larger and better capitalized competitors enforcing their intellectual property rights against us or seeking to invalidate our intellectual property or our rights thereto.

Based on the prolific litigation that has occurred in the stent industry and the fact that we may pose a competitive threat to some large and well-capitalized companies that own or control patents relating to stents and their use, manufacture and delivery, we believe that it is possible that one or more third parties will assert a patent infringement claim against the manufacture, use or sale of our stents based on one or more of these patents. These companies also own patents relating to the use of drugs to treat restenosis, stent architecture, catheters to deliver stents, and stent manufacturing and coating processes and compositions, as well as general delivery mechanism patents like rapid exchange, which might be alleged to cover one or more of our products. In addition, it is possible that a lawsuit of which we are not aware asserting patent infringement, misappropriation of intellectual property, or related claims may have already been filed against us. As the number of competitors in the stent market grows and as the geographies in which we commercially market grow in number and scope, the possibility of patent infringement by us, and/or a patent infringement or misappropriation claim against us, increases.

Our competitors have maintained their positions in the market by, among other things, establishing intellectual property rights relating to their products and enforcing these rights aggressively against their competitors and new entrants into the market. All the major companies in the field of stents and related markets, including Boston Scientific Corporation, C.R. Bard, Inc., W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc., have been repeatedly involved in patent litigation relating to stents since at least 1997. The field of stents and related markets have experienced rapid technological change and obsolescence in the past, and our competitors have strong incentives to stop or delay the introduction of new products and technologies. We may pose a competitive threat to many of the companies in these markets. Accordingly, these companies will have a strong incentive to take steps, through patent litigation or otherwise, to prevent us from distributing our products. Such litigation or claims would divert attention and resources away from the development and/or commercialization of our products and could result in an adverse court judgment that would make it impossible or impractical to sell our products in one or more territories.

If we fail to maintain or establish satisfactory agreements or arrangements with suppliers or if we experience an interruption of the supply of materials from suppliers, we may not be able to obtain materials that are necessary to develop our products.

We depend on outside suppliers for certain raw materials. These raw materials or components may not always be available at our standards or on acceptable terms, if at all, and we may be unable to locate alternative suppliers or produce necessary materials or components on our own.

Some of the components of our products are currently provided by only one vendor, or a single-source supplier. For CGuard EPS and MGuard Prime EPS, we initiateddepend on MeKo Laserstrahl-Materialbearbeitung for the laser cutting of the stent, Natec Medical Ltd. for the supply of catheters, and Biogeneral Inc. for the fiber. We may have difficulty obtaining similar components from other suppliers that are acceptable to the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities if it becomes necessary.

If we have to switch to a replacement supplier, we will face additional regulatory delays and the interruption of the manufacture and delivery of our stents for an extended period of time, which would delay completion of our clinical trials or commercialization of our products. In addition, we will be required to obtain prior regulatory approval from the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities to use different suppliers or components that may not be as safe or as effective. As a result, regulatory approval of our products may not be received on a timely basis or at all.

In addition, we rely on a third-party vendor to perform the sterilization process. A third-party vendor’s failure to properly sterilize a component may cause delays or disruptions in 2014our manufacturing process. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, our third-party sterilizer’s equipment failures resulted in significant interruption in sterilized product supply for the majority of the first quarter. As a result of this interruption in the delivery of sterilized products and our limited inventory levels on hand prior to this interruption, we were unable to fulfill a significant portion of the orders received during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.

We are subject to financial reporting and other requirements that place significant demands on our resources.

We are subject to reporting and other obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 requires us to conduct an annual management assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. These reporting and other obligations place significant demands on our management, administrative, operational, internal audit and accounting resources. Any failure to maintain effective internal controls could continue to have a significantmaterial adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price. Moreover, effective internal control is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, we may not be able to manage our business as effectively as we would if an effective control environment existed, and our business and reputation with investors may be harmed.

There are inherent limitations in all control systems, and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

The ongoing internal control provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require us to identify material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, which is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our internal controls and disclosure controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefit of controls must be relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, in our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Further, controls can be circumvented by individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more persons, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may be inadequate because of changes in conditions, such as growth of the company or increased transaction volume, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

In addition, discovery and disclosure of a material weakness, by definition, could have a material adverse impact on us.our financial statements. Such an occurrence could discourage certain customers or suppliers from doing business with us and adversely affect how our stock trades. This could in turn negatively affect our ability to access equity markets for capital.

Risks Related to our Products, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Matters

Clinical trials necessary to support a pre-market approval application will be lengthy and expensive and will require the enrollment of a large number of patients, and suitable patients may be difficult to identify and recruit. Any such delay or failure of clinical trials could prevent us from commercializing our stent products, which would materially and adversely affect our results of operations and the value of our business.

Clinical trials necessary to support a pre-market approval application to the FDA for our CGuard EPS stent will be expensive and will require the enrollment of a large number of patients, and suitable patients may be difficult to identify and recruit, which may cause a delay in the development and commercialization of our product candidates. Patient enrollment in clinical trials and the ability to successfully complete patient follow-up depends on many factors, including the size of the patient population, the nature of the trial protocol, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the clinical trial and patient compliance. For example, patients may be discouraged from enrolling in our clinical trials if the trial protocol requires them to undergo extensive post-treatment procedures or follow-up to assess the safety and efficacy of our products, or they may be persuaded to participate in contemporaneous clinical trials of competitive products. In addition, patients participating in our clinical trials may die before completion of the trial or suffer adverse medical events unrelated to or related to our products. Delays in patient enrollment or failure of patients to continue to participate in a clinical trial may cause an increase in costs and delays or result in the failure of the clinical trial.

In addition, the length of time required to complete clinical trials for pharmaceutical and medical device products varies substantially according to the degree of regulation and the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of a product, and can continue for several years and cost millions of dollars. The commencement and completion of clinical trials for our products under development may be delayed by many factors, including governmental or regulatory delays and changes in regulatory requirements, policy and guidelines or our inability or the inability of any potential licensee to manufacture or obtain from third parties materials sufficient for use in preclinical studies and clinical trials.

Our products may in the future be subject to product notifications, recalls, or voluntary market withdrawals that could harm our reputation, business and financial results.

 

The manufacturing and marketing of medical devices involves an inherent risk that our products may prove to be defective and cause a health risk even after regulatory clearances have been obtained. Medical devices may also be modified after regulatory clearance is obtained to such an extent that additional regulatory clearance is necessary before the device can be further marketed. In these events, we may voluntarily implement a recall or market withdrawal or may be required to do so by a regulatory authority.

 

On April 30, 2014 we initiated a voluntary field corrective action of our MGuard Prime EPS to address the issue of stent retention following reports of MGuard Prime EPS stent dislodgements in patients. Although there have been no reports of death or serious injury as a result of such dislodgements, we decided to suspend shipments of the MGuard Prime EPS and implement a field corrective action to enhance the reliability and performance of the affected product units in the field. We received European regulatory approval to resume manufacturing and distribution of our MGuard Prime EPS stent with a modified stent securement process, and we resumed shipping products to new customers in our direct markets in Europe in late September 2014. We completed the full re-launch of MGuard Prime EPS in 2015.

As a result of our voluntary field action, we are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including the following:

although we resumed manufacturing and distribution of our MGuard Prime EPS stent with a modified stent securement process, our suspension of shipments has and may continue to adversely impact revenue;
we are more susceptible to claims such as product liability claims, distributor claims and class action lawsuits as a result of the reported product malfunction and voluntary field action, which could significantly increase our costs and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations; and
our decision to implement the voluntary field action and discontinue shipments, and any additional action related to such decision, may harm our reputation or the market’s perception of our products, which could have a negative impact on our future sales and our ability to generate profits.

In the European Economic Area, we must comply with the EU Medical Device Vigilance System. Under this system, manufacturers are required to take Field Safety Corrective Actions (“FSCAs”) to reduce a risk of death or serious deterioration in the state of health associated with the use of a medical device that is already placed on the market. A FSCA may include the recall, modification, exchange, destruction or retrofitting of the device. FSCAs must be communicated by the manufacturer or its legal representative to its customers and/or to the end users of the device through Field Safety Notices.

 

Any adverse event involving our products could result in other future voluntary corrective actions, such as recalls or customer notifications, or agency action, such as inspection or enforcement action. Adverse events such as the MGuard Prime EPS stent dislodgements, have been reported to us in the past, and we cannot guarantee that they will not occur in the future. Any corrective action, whether voluntary or involuntary, as well as defending ourselves in a lawsuit, would require the dedication of our time and capital, distract management from operating our business and could harm our reputation and financial results.

 

We expect to derive our revenue from sales of our MGuard PrimeCGuard EPS and CGuardMGuard Prime EPS stent products and other products we may develop, such as CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter .enhancements. If we fail to generate revenue from these sources, our results of operations and the value of our business would be materially and adversely affected.

 

We expect our revenue to be generated from sales of our MGuard PrimeCGuard EPS and CGuardMGuard Prime EPS stent products and other products we may develop. Future sales of CGuard EPS will be subject to the receipt of regulatory approvals and commercial and market uncertainties that may be outside our control. In addition, sales of MGuard Prime EPS have been hampered by weakened demand for bare metal stents, which may never improve, and we may not be successful in developing a drug-eluting stent product. In addition, there may be insufficient demand for other products we are seeking to develop, such as CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter .enhancements. If we fail to generate expected revenues from these products, our results of operations and the value of our business and securities would be materially and adversely affected.

If we are unable to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection covering our products, others may be able to make, use or sell our products, which would adversely affect our revenue.

Our ability to protect our products from unauthorized or infringing use by third parties depends substantially on our ability to obtain and maintain valid and enforceable patents. Similarly, the ability to protect our trademark rights might be important to prevent third party counterfeiters from selling poor quality goods using our designated trademarks/trade names. Due to evolving legal standards relating to the patentability, validity and enforceability of patents covering medical devices and pharmaceutical inventions and the scope of claims made under these patents, our ability to enforce patents is uncertain and involves complex legal and factual questions. Accordingly, rights under any of our pending patent applications and patents may not provide us with commercially meaningful protection for our products or may not afford a commercial advantage against our competitors or their competitive products or processes. In addition, patents may not be issued from any pending or future patent applications owned by or licensed to us, and moreover, patents that may be issued to us now or in the future may not be valid or enforceable. Further, even if valid and enforceable, our patents may not be sufficiently broad to prevent others from marketing products like ours, despite our patent rights.

The validity of our patent claims depends, in part, on whether prior art references exist that describe or render obvious our inventions as of the filing date of our patent applications. We may not have identified all prior art, such as U.S. and foreign patents or published applications or published scientific literature, that could adversely affect the patentability of our pending patent applications. For example, some material references may be in a foreign language and may not be uncovered during examination of our patent applications. Additionally, patent applications in the United States are maintained in confidence for up to 18 months after their filing. In some cases, however, patent applications remain confidential in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for the entire time prior to issuance as a U.S. patent. Patent applications filed in countries outside the U.S. are not typically published until at least 18 months from their first filing date. Similarly, publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature often lags behind actual discoveries. Therefore, we cannot be certain that we were the first to invent, or the first to file patent applications relating to, our stent technologies. In the event that a third party has also filed a U.S. patent application covering our stents or a similar invention, we may have to participate in an adversarial proceeding, known as an interference, declared by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to determine priority of invention in the United States. It is possible that we may be unsuccessful in the interference, resulting in a loss of some portion or all of our position in the United States.

In addition, statutory differences in patentable subject matter depending on the jurisdiction may limit the protection we obtain on certain of the technologies we develop. The laws of some foreign jurisdictions do not offer the same protection to, or may make it more difficult to effect the enforcement of, proprietary rights as in the United States, risk that may be exacerbated if we move our manufacturing to certain countries in Asia. If we encounter such difficulties or are otherwise precluded from effectively protecting our intellectual property rights in any foreign jurisdictions, our business prospects could be substantially harmed.

We may initiate litigation to enforce our patent rights on any patents issued on pending patent applications, which may prompt adversaries in such litigation to challenge the validity, scope, ownership, or enforceability of our patents. Third parties can sometimes bring challenges against a patent holder to resolve these issues, as well. If a court decides that any such patents are not valid, not enforceable, not wholly owned by us, or are of a limited scope, we may not have the right to stop others from using our inventions. Also, even if our patent rights are determined by a court to be valid and enforceable, they may not be sufficiently broad to prevent others from marketing products similar to ours or designing around our patents, despite our patent rights, nor do they provide us with freedom to operate unimpeded by the patent and other intellectual property rights of others that may cover our products. We may be forced into litigation to uphold the validity of the claims in our patent portfolio, as well as our ownership rights to such intellectual property, and litigation is often an uncertain and costly process.

We also rely on trade secret protection to protect our interests in proprietary know-how and for processes for which patents are difficult to obtain or enforce. We may not be able to protect our trade secrets adequately. In addition, we rely on non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants and other parties to protect, in part, trade secrets and other proprietary technology. These agreements may be breached and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. Moreover, others may independently develop equivalent proprietary information, and third parties may otherwise gain access to our trade secrets and proprietary knowledge. Any disclosure of confidential data into the public domain or to third parties could allow competitors to learn our trade secrets and use the information in competition against us.

 

If our manufacturing facilities are unable to provide an adequate supply of products, our growth could be limited and our business could be harmed.

 

We currently manufacture our MGuard PrimeCGuard EPS and CGuardMGuard Prime EPS products at our facility in Tel Aviv, Israel. If there were a disruption to our existing manufacturing facility, we would have no other means of manufacturing our MGuard PrimeCGuard EPS or CGuardMGuard Prime EPS stents until we were able to restore the manufacturing capability at our facility or develop alternative manufacturing facilities. If we were unable to produce sufficient quantities of our MGuard PrimeCGuard EPS or CGuardMGuard Prime EPS stents to meet market demand or for use in our current and planned clinical trials, or if our manufacturing process yields substandard stents, our development and commercialization efforts would be delayed.

 

Additionally, any damage to or destruction of our Tel Aviv facility or its equipment, prolonged power outage or contamination at our facility would significantly impair our ability to produce either MGuard PrimeCGuard EPS or CGuardMGuard Prime EPS stents.

 

Finally, the production of our stents must occur in a highly controlled, clean environment to minimize particles and other yield and quality-limiting contaminants. In spite of stringent quality controls, weaknesses in process control or minute impurities in materials may cause a substantial percentage of defective products in a lot. If we are unable to maintain stringent quality controls, or if contamination problems arise, our clinical development and commercialization efforts could be delayed, which would harm our business and results of operations.

Pre-clinicalCompleting clinical trials for CGuard EPS in the United States require meeting a number of regulatory requirements and must be conducted in compliance with the FDA’s IDE regulations. Failure to maintain compliance with IDE regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Clinical trials involve use of a medical device candidate (or drug, biological, or other product candidate, as applicable) on human subjects under the supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with current Good Clinical Practices, including the requirement that all research subjects provide informed consent for their participation in the clinical study. The FDA classifies medical device candidates into “significant risk” and “non-significant risk” devices. Significant risk devices present a potential for serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a subject. Examples may include implants, devices that support or sustain human life, and devices that are substantially important in diagnosing, curing, mitigating, or treating disease or in preventing impairment to human health. If a medical device candidate presents a significant risk, an IDE application must be submitted and approved prior to commencing any human clinical trials in the United States in connection with such device. The FDA may approve, conditionally approve, or deny an IDE or it may require further information and, thus, delay approval. On September 8, 2020, we received IDE approval for CGuard™ Carotid Stent System, CARENET-III.

In addition to our recent IDE approval for CGuard™ Carotid Stent System, CARENET-III, we must apply for and obtain IRB approval of the proposed CGuard EPS clinical study in connection with each clinical site before commencing any study activities. A written protocol with predefined end points, an appropriate sample size, and pre-determined patient inclusion and exclusion criteria, is also required before we may initiate or conduct the CGuard EPS trial. If we obtain IDE approval, IRB approval, and meet all of the other applicable requirements that must be met before beginning clinical trials in the United States, we will, then, be able to lawfully initiate the clinical investigation of the safety and effectiveness of CGuard EPS in the United States.

Importantly, the CGuard EPS clinical trial and any others that we may conduct in the future, must be conducted in accordance with the FDA’s IDE regulations, which, among other things, establish requirements for investigational device labeling, prohibit pre-approval promotion of a device candidate, and specify recordkeeping, reporting, and monitoring responsibilities of study sponsors and study investigators.

We may not be able to obtain IRB approval to undertake clinical trials in the United States for CGuard EPS or any new devices we intend to market in the United States in the future. If we do obtain such approvals, we may not be able to conduct studies which comply with the IDE and other regulations governing clinical investigations or the data from any such trials may not support clearance or approval of the investigational device. Failure to obtain such approvals or to comply with such regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Relatedly, certainty that clinical trials will meet desired endpoints, produce meaningful or useful data, and be free of unexpected adverse effects, or that the FDA will accept the validity of foreign clinical study data, as applicable, cannot be guaranteed, and such uncertainty could preclude or delay regulatory approvals and commercialization, resulting in significant financial costs and reduced revenue. Moreover, the timing of the commencement, continuation, and completion of any future clinical trial may be subject to significant delays attributable to various causes, including, but not limited to, scheduling conflicts with participating clinicians and clinical institutions, difficulties in identifying and enrolling patients who meet trial eligibility criteria, failure of patients to complete the clinical trial, delay in or failure to meet regulatory and/or IRB requirements to conduct a clinical trial at a one or more prospective sites, and shortages of supply in the investigational device.

Though necessary to pursue FDA’s premarket approval, pre-clinical and clinical trials will beare inherently lengthy and expensive and subject to any number of regulatory and/or clinical difficulties that can cause further delays, additional costs, and/or rejection by the FDA, and any such delay, added cost, or failure ofin connection with any future clinical trials could prevent us from commercializing our MicroNet products in the United States, which would materially and adversely affect our results of operations and the value of our business.

  

As part of the regulatory process, we must conduct clinical trials for each product candidate to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of the regulatory authorities, including, if we seek in the future to sell our products in the United States, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.FDA. Clinical trials are subject to rigorous regulatory requirements and are expensive and time-consuming to design and implement. They require the enrollment of a large number of patients, and suitable patients may be difficult to identify and recruit, which may cause a delay in the development and commercialization of our product candidates. In some trials, a greater number of patients and a longer follow-up period may be required. Patient enrollment in clinical trials and the ability to successfully complete patient follow-up depends on many factors, including the size of the patient population, the nature of the trial protocol, the proximity of patients to clinical sites, the eligibility criteria for the clinical trial and patient compliance. For example, patients may be discouraged from enrolling in our clinical trials if the trial protocol requires them to undergo extensive post-treatment procedures or follow-up to assess the safety and efficacy of our products, or they may be persuaded to participate in contemporaneous clinical trials of competitive products. In addition, patients participating in our clinical trials may die before completion of the trial or suffer adverse medical events unrelated to or related to our products. Delays in patient enrollment or failure of patients to continue to participate in a clinical trial may cause an increase in costs and delays or result in the failure of the clinical trial.

 

In addition, the length of time required to complete clinical trials for pharmaceutical and medical device products varies substantially according to the degree of regulation and the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of a product, and can continue for several years and cost millions of dollars. The commencement and completion of clinical trials for our existing products and those under development may be delayed by many factors, including governmental or regulatory delays and changes in regulatory requirements, policy and guidelines or our inability or the inability of any potential licensee to manufacture or obtain from third parties materials sufficient for use in preclinical studies and clinical trials. In addition, market demand may change for products being tested due to the length of time needed to complete requisite clinical trials.

 

Physicians may not widely adopt our products unless they determine, based on experience, long-term clinical data and published peer reviewed journal articles, among other standard-of-care considerations, that the use of our stents provides a safe and effective alternative to other existing treatments for coronary artery disease and carotid artery disease.

 

We believe that physicians will not widely adopt our products unless they determine, based on experience, long-term clinical data, and published peer reviewed journal articles and payor coverage policies, among other factors, that the use of our products provide a safe and effective alternative to other existing treatments for the conditions we are seeking to address.

 

If we fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy that is at least comparable to existing and future therapies available on the market, our ability to successfully market our products will be significantly limited. Even if the data collected from clinical studies or clinical experience indicate positive results, each physician’s actual experience with our products will vary. Clinical trials conducted with our products may involve procedures performed by physicians who are technically proficient and are high-volume stent users of such products. Consequently, both short-term and long-term results reported in these clinical trials may be significantly more favorable than typical results of practicing physicians, which could negatively affect rates of adoptions of our products. We also believe that published peer-reviewed journal articles and recommendations and support by influential physicians regarding our products will be important for market acceptance and adoption, and we cannot assure you that we will receive these recommendations and support, or that supportive articles will be published.

 

Physicians currently consider drug-eluting stents to be the industry standard for treatment of coronary artery disease. None ofMGuard Prime EPS, our current coronary productsproduct, is anot drug-eluting, stent, and this may adversely affect our business.

 

Our ability to attract customers depends to a large extent on our ability to provide goods that meet the customers’ and the market’s demands and expectations. If we do not have a product that is expected by the market, we may lose customers. The market demand has shifted away from bare metal stents in favor of drug-eluting stents.stents for coronary artery disease. Our MGuard Prime EPS is a bare-metal stent product and has experienced a substantial reductionno growth in sales over the past twofive years. Such sales may never recovergrow and we do not currently have the resources to develop a drug-eluting stent product. Our failure to provide industry standard devices could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our products are based on a new technology, and weWe have only limited experience in regulatory affairs, which may affect our ability or the time required to navigate complex regulatory requirements and obtain necessary regulatory approvals, if such approvals are received at all. Regulatory delays or denials may increase our costs, cause us to lose revenue and materially and adversely affect our results of operations and the value of our business.

 

Because our products are new and long-term success measures have not been completely validated for our products, especially CGuard EPS, regulatory agencies may take a significant amount of time in evaluating product approval applications. Treatments may exhibit a favorable measure using one metric and an unfavorable measure using another metric. Any change in accepted metrics may result in reconfiguration of, and delays in, our clinical trials. Additionally, we have only limited experience in filing and prosecuting the applications necessary to gain regulatory approvals, and our clinical, regulatory and quality assurance personnel are currently composed of only fourfive employees. As a result, we may experience delays in connection with obtaining regulatory approvals for our products.

 

In addition, the products we and any potential licensees license, develop, manufacture and market are subject to complex regulatory requirements, particularly in the United States, Europe and Asia, which can be costly and time-consuming. There can be no assurance that such approvals will be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Furthermore, there can be no assurance of continued compliance with all regulatory requirements necessary for the manufacture, marketing and sale of the products we will offer in each market where such products are expected to be sold, or that products we have commercialized will continue to comply with applicable regulatory requirements. If a government regulatory agency were to conclude that we were not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, the agency could institute proceedings to detain or seize our products, issue a recall, impose operating restrictions, enjoin future violations and assess civil and criminal penalties against us, our officers or employees and could recommend criminal prosecution. Furthermore, regulators may proceed to ban, or request the recall, repair, replacement or refund of the cost of, any device manufactured or sold by us. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that all necessary regulatory approvals will be obtained for the manufacture, marketing and sale in any market of any new product developed or that any potential licensee will develop using our licensed technology.

 

Even if our products are approved by regulatory authorities, if we or our suppliers fail to comply with ongoing regulatory requirements, or if we experience unanticipated problems with our products, these products could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market.

 

Any regulatory approvals that we receive for our products will require surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product and may require us to conduct post-approval clinical studies. In addition, if a regulatory authority approves our products, the manufacturing processes, labeling, packaging, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion, import, export and recordkeeping for our products will be subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements.

 

Moreover, if we obtain regulatory approval for any of our products, we will only be permitted to market our products for the indication approved by the regulatory authority, and such approval may involve limitations on the indicated uses or promotional claims we may make for our products. In addition, later discovery of previously unknown problems with our products, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our suppliers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, among other things:

 

 restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of our product candidates, withdrawal of the product from the market, or voluntary or mandatory product recalls;
   
 fines, warning letters, or untitled letters;
   
 holds on clinical trials;
   
 refusal by the regulatory authority to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications filed by us or suspension or revocation of license approvals;
   
 product seizure or detention, or refusal to permit the import or export of our product candidates; and
   
 injunctions, the imposition of civil penalties or criminal prosecution.

The FDA also requires that our sales and marketing efforts, as well as promotions, be consistent with various laws and regulations. Approved medical device promotions must be consistent with and not contrary to labeling, balanced, truthful and not false or misleading, adequately substantiated (when required), and include adequate directions for use. In addition to the requirements applicable to approved products, we may also be subject to enforcement action in connection with any promotion of an investigational new device. A sponsor or investigator, or any person acting on behalf of a sponsor or investigator, may not represent in a promotional context that an investigational new device is safe or effective for the purposes for which it is under investigation or otherwise promote the device.

If the FDA investigates our marketing and promotional materials or other communications and finds that any of our investigational devices, or future commercial products, if any, are being marketed or promoted in violation of the applicable regulatory restrictions, we could be subject to the enforcement actions listed above, among others. Any enforcement action (or related lawsuit, which could follow such action) brought against us in connection with alleged violations of applicable device promotion requirements, or prohibitions, could harm our business and our reputation, as well as the reputation of any devices that may be approved for marketing in the U.S. in the future.

The applicable regulatory authorities’ policies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our products. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability.

Further, healthcare lawsFailure to obtain regulatory approval in foreign jurisdictions will prevent us from marketing our products in such jurisdictions.

We market our products in international markets. In order to market our products in other foreign jurisdictions, we must obtain separate regulatory approvals from the appropriate governing body in each applicable country. The approval processes vary among countries and regulationscan involve additional testing, and the time required to obtain approval may change significantlydiffer from that required to obtain CE mark or FDA approval. Foreign regulatory approval processes may include all of the risks associated with obtaining CE mark or FDA approval in the future. Any new healthcare lawsaddition to other risks. We may not obtain foreign regulatory approvals on a timely basis, if at all. CE mark approval or regulations may adversely affect our business. A review of our businessany future FDA approval does not ensure approval by courts or regulatory authorities in other countries. We may resultnot be able to file for regulatory approvals and may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our products in a determination that could adversely affect our operations. In addition, the healthcare regulatory environment may change in a way that restricts our operations.certain markets.

 

We are, or may be, subject to federal, state and foreign healthcare laws and regulations and implementation of or changes to such healthcare laws and regulations could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

 

In both the United States and certain foreign jurisdictions, there are laws and regulations specific to the healthcare industry which may affect all aspects of our business, including development, testing, marketing, sales, pricing, and reimbursement. Additionally, there have been a number of legislative and regulatory proposals in recent years to change the healthcare system in ways that could impact our ability to sell our products. If we are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other federal or state regulations, we may be subject to administrative, civil and/or criminal penalties, damages, fines, individual imprisonment, exclusion from federal health carehealthcare programs and the restructuring of our operations. Any of these could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. Since many of these laws have not been fully interpreted by the courts, there is an increased risk that we may be found in violation of one or more of their provisions. Any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we ultimately are successful in our defense, will cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention away from the operation of our business.

Failure to obtain regulatory approval in foreign jurisdictions will prevent us from marketing our products in such jurisdictions.

We market our products in international markets. In order to market our products in other foreign jurisdictions, we must obtain separate regulatory approvals from those obtained in the United States and Europe. The approval procedure varies among countries and can involve additional testing, and the time required to obtain approval may differ from that required to obtain CE mark or U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval. Foreign regulatory approval processes may include all of the risks associated with obtaining CE mark or U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval in addition to other risks. We may not obtain foreign regulatory approvals on a timely basis, if at all. CE mark approval does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries. We may not be able to file for regulatory approvals and may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our products in certain markets.

 

We operate in an intensely competitivemay be subject, directly or indirectly, to applicable U.S. federal and rapidly changing business environment,state anti-kickback, false claims laws, physician payment transparency laws, fraud and there is a substantial risk our productsabuse laws or similar healthcare and security laws and regulations, which could become obsolete or uncompetitive.expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.

 

Healthcare providers, physicians and others will play a primary role in the recommendation, ordering and utilization of any products for which we obtain regulatory approval. If we obtain U.S. Food & Drug Administration approval for any of our products and begin commercializing those products in the United States, our operations may be subject to various federal and state fraud and abuse laws, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal False Claims Act, and physician payment sunshine laws and regulations. These laws may impact, among other things, our potential sales, marketing and education programs. In addition, we may be subject to patient privacy regulation by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. The laws that may affect our ability to operate include:

● the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying any remuneration (including any kickback, bribe, or rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind, to induce, or in return for, either the referral of an individual, or the purchase, lease, order or recommendation of any good, facility, item or service for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, under a federal healthcare program, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs;

● federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws, including the False Claims Act, which may be pursued through civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, impose criminal and civil penalties against individuals or entities for knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government, claims for payment or approval from Medicare, Medicaid or other third-party payors that are false or fraudulent or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government;

● federal criminal statutes created through the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), which prohibit knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, any healthcare benefit program, regardless of the payor (e.g., public or private) and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up by any trick or device a material fact or making any materially false statements in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items or services relating to healthcare matters;

● HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 and their respective implementing regulations, which imposes requirements on certain covered healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses as well as their respective business associates that perform services for them that involve the use, or disclosure of, individually identifiable health information, relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information;

● the federal transparency requirements under The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, enacted into law in the United States in March 2010 (known collectively as the “Affordable Care Act”), including the provision commonly referred to as the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which requires manufacturers of drugs, biologics, devices and medical device marketsupplies for which payment is highly competitive. We compete with manyavailable under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program to report annually to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services information related to payments or other transfers of value made to physicians and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members; and

● state and federal consumer protection and unfair competition laws, which broadly regulate marketplace activities and activities that potentially harm consumers.

Additionally, we may be subject to state and non-U.S. equivalents of each of the healthcare laws described above, among others, some of which may be broader in scope and may apply regardless of the payor. Many U.S. states have adopted laws similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, some of which apply to the referral of patients for healthcare services reimbursed by any source, not just governmental payors, including private insurers. Several states impose marketing restrictions or require medical device companies globally in connectionto make marketing or price disclosures to the state. There are ambiguities as to what is required to comply with our current productsthese state requirements, and products under development. We face competition from numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in the therapeutics area, as well as competition from academic institutions, government agencies and research institutions. Whenif we commercialize our products,fail to comply with an applicable state law requirement we expect to face intense competition from Boston Scientific Corporation, Guidant Corporation, Medtronic, Inc., Abbott Vascular Devices, Johnson & Johnson, Terumo Corporation, Covidien Ltd., Cordis Corporation (currently part of Cardinal Health, Inc.) and others. Most of our current and potential competitors, including but not limited to those listed above, have, and will continue to have, substantially greater financial, technological, research and development, regulatory and clinical, manufacturing, marketing and sales, distribution and personnel resources than we do. There cancould be no assurance that we will have sufficient resources to successfully commercialize our products, if and when they are approved for sale. The worldwide market for stent products is characterized by intensive development efforts and rapidly advancing technology. Our future success will depend largely upon our ability to anticipate and keep pace with those developments and advances. Current or future competitors could develop alternative technologies, products or materials that are more effective, easier to use or more economical than what we or any potential licensee develop. If our technologies or products become obsolete or uncompetitive, our related product sales and licensing revenue would decrease. This would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may become subject to claims by much larger and better capitalized competitors seeking to invalidate our intellectual property or our rights thereto.penalties.

Based onBecause of the prolific litigation that has occurred in the stent industrybreadth of these laws and the fact that we may pose a competitive threat to some largenarrowness of the statutory exceptions and well-capitalized companies that own or control patents relating to stents and their use, manufacture and delivery, we believe thatsafe harbors available, it is possible that one or more third parties will assert a patent infringement claim against the manufacture, use or salesome of our stents based onfuture business activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. In addition, healthcare reform legislation has strengthened these patents. These companies also own patents relatinglaws. For example, the Affordable Care Act, among other things, amended the intent requirement of the federal Anti-Kickback and criminal healthcare fraud statutes. As a result of such amendment, a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of these statutes or specific intent to violate them in order to have committed a violation. Moreover, the useAffordable Care Act provides that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of drugsthe federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act.

Violations of fraud and abuse laws may be punishable by criminal and/or civil sanctions, including penalties, fines and/or exclusion or suspension from federal and state healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid and debarment from contracting with the U.S. government. In addition, private individuals have the ability to treat restenosis, stent architecture, catheters to deliver stents, and stent manufacturing and coating processes and compositions,bring actions on behalf of the U.S. government under the False Claims Act as well, as general delivery mechanism patents like rapid exchangeunder the false claims laws of several states.

Efforts to ensure that might be alleged to cover one or more of our products. A number of stent-related patents are owned by very largebusiness arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and well-capitalized companies that are active participants in the stent market. In addition, itregulations will involve substantial costs. It is possible that a lawsuit asserting patent infringement, misappropriation of intellectual property,governmental authorities will conclude that our existing or related claims may have already been filedfuture business practices do not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. Any such actions instituted against us could have a significant adverse impact on our business, including the imposition of civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, disgorgement, monetary fines, possible exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and future earnings, and curtailment of our operations, any of which could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our results of operations. Even if we are successful in defending against such actions, we may nonetheless be subject to substantial costs, reputational harm and adverse effects on our ability to operate our business. In addition, the approval and commercialization of any of our products outside the United States will also likely subject us to non-U.S. equivalents of the healthcare laws mentioned above, among other non-U.S. laws.

If any of our employees, agents, or the physicians or other providers or entities with whom we expect to do business are found to have violated applicable laws, we may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government funded healthcare programs, or, if we are not aware. As the numbersubject to such actions, we may suffer reputational harm for conducting business with persons or entities found, or accused of competitorsbeing, in the stent market grows and as the geographies in which we commercially market grow in number and scope, the possibilityviolation of patent infringement by us, and/or a patent infringement or misappropriation claim against us, increases.

These companies have maintained their position in the market by, among other things, establishing intellectual property rights relatingsuch laws. Any such events could adversely affect our ability to their products and enforcing these rights aggressively against their competitors and new entrants into the market. All of the major companies in the stent and related markets, including Boston Scientific Corporation, C.R. Bard, Inc., W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc., have been repeatedly involved in patent litigation relating to stents since at least 1997. The stent and related markets have experienced rapid technological change and obsolescence in the past,operate our business and our competitors have strong incentives to stop or delay the introductionresults of new products and technologies. We may pose a competitive threat to many of the companies in the stent and related markets. Accordingly, many of these companies will have a strong incentive to take steps, through patent litigation or otherwise, to prevent us from commercializing our products. Such litigation or claims would divert attention and resources away from the development and/or commercialization of our products and product development, and could result in an adverse court judgment that would make it impossible or impractical to sell our products in one or more territories.operations.

 

If we fail to maintain or establish satisfactory agreements or arrangements with suppliers or if we experience an interruption of the supply of materials from suppliers, we may not be able to obtain materials that are necessary to develop our products.

We depend on outside suppliers for certain raw materials. These raw materials or components may not always be available at our standards or on acceptable terms, if at all, and we may be unable to locate alternative suppliers or produce necessary materials or components on our own.

Some of the components of our products are currently provided by only one vendor, or a single-source supplier. For MGuard Prime EPS and CGuard EPS, we depend on MeKo Laserstrahl-Materialbearbeitung for the laser cutting of the stent, Natec Medical Ltd. for the supply of catheters, and Biogeneral Inc. for the fiber. We may have difficulty obtaining similar components from other suppliers that are acceptable to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or foreign regulatory authorities if it becomes necessary.

If we have to switch to a replacement supplier, we will face additional regulatory delays and the interruption of the manufacture and delivery of our stents for an extended period of time, which would delay completion of our clinical trials or commercialization of our products. In addition, we will be required to obtain prior regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or foreign regulatory authorities to use different suppliers or components that may not be as safe or as effective. As a result, regulatory approval of our products may not be received on a timely basis or at all.

We may be exposed to product liability claims and insurance may not be sufficient to cover these claims.

 

We may be exposed to product liability claims based on the use of any of our products, or products incorporating our licensed technology, in the market or clinical trials. We may also be exposed to product liability claims based on the sale of any products under development following the receipt of regulatory approval. Product liability claims could be asserted directly by consumers, health-care providers or others. We have obtained product liability insurance coverage; however such insurance may not provide full coverage for our future clinical trials, products to be sold, and other aspects of our business. Insurance coverage is becoming increasingly expensive and we may not be able to maintain current coverage, or expand our insurance coverage to include future clinical trials or the sale of new products incorporating our licensed technology if marketing approval is obtained for suchor existing products in new territories, at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts to protect against losses due to product liability or at all. A successful product liability claim or series of claims brought against us could result in judgments, fines, damages and liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may incur significant expense investigating and defending these claims, even if they do not result in liability. Moreover, even if no judgments, fines, damages or liabilities are imposed on us, our reputation could suffer, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Even if one or more of our products are approved by the FDA, we may fail to obtain an adequate level of reimbursement for our products by third party payors, such that there may be no commercially viable markets for our products or the markets may be much smaller than expected.

The availability and levels of reimbursement by governmental and other third-party payors affect the market for our products. The efficacy, safety, performance and cost-effectiveness of our products and of any competing products are factors that may impact the availability and level of reimbursement. Reimbursement and healthcare payment systems in international markets vary significantly by country and include both government sponsored healthcare and private insurance. To obtain reimbursement or pricing approval in some countries, we may be required to produce clinical data, which may involve one or more clinical trials that compares the cost-effectiveness of our products to other available therapies. We may not obtain international reimbursement or pricing approvals in a timely manner, if at all. Our failure to receive international reimbursement or pricing approvals would negatively impact market acceptance of our products in the international markets in which those approvals are sought.

We believe that future reimbursement may be subject to increased restrictions both in the U.S. and in international markets. There is increasing pressure by governments worldwide to contain healthcare costs by limiting both the coverage and the level of reimbursement for therapeutic products and by refusing, in some cases, to provide any coverage for products that have not been approved by the relevant regulatory agency. Future legislation, regulation or reimbursement policies of third party payors may adversely affect the demand for our products and limit our ability to sell our products on a profitable basis. In addition, third party payors continually attempt to contain or reduce the costs of healthcare by challenging the prices charged for healthcare products and services. If reimbursement for our products is unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, market acceptance of our products would be impaired, and future revenues, if any, would be adversely affected.

In the United States and European Union, our business could be significantly and adversely affected by healthcare reform initiatives and/or other legislation or judicial interpretations of existing or future healthcare laws and/or regulations.

The Affordable Care Act, signed into law in the United States in March 2010, contains certain provisions which are not yet fully implemented and for which it is unclear what the full impact will be from the legislation.

The legislation also focuses on a number of provisions aimed at improving quality, broadening access to health insurance, enhancing remedies for fraud and abuse, adding transparency requirements, and decreasing healthcare costs, among others. Uncertainties remain regarding what negative unintended consequences these provisions will have on patient access to new technologies, pricing and the market for our products, and the healthcare industry in general. The Affordable Care Act includes provisions affecting the Medicare program, such as value-based payment programs, increased funding of comparative effectiveness research, reduced hospital payments for avoidable readmissions and hospital acquired conditions, and pilot programs to evaluate alternative payment methodologies that promote care coordination (such as bundled physician and hospital payments). Additionally, the provisions include a reduction in the annual rate of inflation for hospitals which started in 2011 and the establishment of an independent payment advisory board to recommend ways of reducing the rate of growth in Medicare spending. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicare or other government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors.

Some of the provisions of the Affordable Care Act have yet to be implemented, and there have been judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the Affordable Care Act, as well as recent efforts by the Trump presidential administration to repeal or replace certain aspects of the Affordable Care Act. Since January 2017, the president has signed two executive orders and other directives designed to delay the implementation of certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act or otherwise circumvent some of the requirements for health insurance mandated by the Affordable Care Act. Congress has considered legislation that would repeal or repeal and replace all or part of the Affordable Care Act. While Congress has not passed comprehensive repeal legislation, two bills affecting the implementation of certain taxes under the Affordable Care Act have been signed into law. The TCJA includes a provision repealing, effective January 1, 2019, the tax-based shared responsibility payment imposed by the Affordable Care Act on certain individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year that is commonly referred to as the “individual mandate.” Additionally, the 2020 federal spending package permanently eliminated, effective January 1, 2020, the Affordable Care Act-mandated “Cadillac” tax on high-cost employer-sponsored health coverage and medical device tax and, effective January 1, 2021, also eliminates the health insurer tax. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, among other things, amended the Affordable Care Act, effective January 1, 2019, to close the coverage gap in most Medicare plans, commonly referred to as the “donut hole.” In July 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, published a final rule permitting further collections and payments to and from certain Affordable Care Act qualified health plans and health insurance issuers under the Affordable Care Act risk adjustment program in response to the outcome of federal district court litigation regarding the method CMS uses to determine this risk adjustment.

The Trump administration has also taken executive actions to undermine or delay implementation of the Affordable Care Act. Since January 2017, the President Trump has signed two Executive Orders designed to delay the implementation of certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act or otherwise circumvent some of the requirements for health insurance mandated by the Affordable Care Act. One Executive Order directs federal agencies with authorities and responsibilities under the Affordable Care Act to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision of the Affordable Care Act that would impose a fiscal or regulatory burden on states, individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals or medical devices. The second Executive Order terminates the cost-sharing subsidies that reimburse insurers under the Affordable Care Act. Several state Attorneys General filed suit to stop the administration from terminating the subsidies, but their request for a restraining order was denied by a federal judge in California on October 25, 2017. In addition, CMS has recently proposed regulations that would give states greater flexibility in setting benchmarks for insurers in the individual and small group marketplaces, which may have the effect of relaxing the essential health benefits required under the Affordable Care Act for plans sold through such marketplaces. Further, on June 14, 2018, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the federal government was not required to pay more than $12 billion in Affordable Care Act risk corridor payments to third-party payors who argued such payments were owed to them, which the U.S. Supreme Court is reviewing during its current term. The effects of this gap in reimbursement on third-party payors, the viability of the Affordable Care Act marketplace, providers, and potentially our business, are not yet known.

We cannot predict the impact that such actions against the Affordable Care Act will have on our business, and there is uncertainty as to what healthcare programs and regulations may be implemented or changed at the federal and/or state level in the United States, or the effect of any future legislation or regulation. Furthermore, we cannot predict what actions the Biden administration will implement in connection with the Affordable Care Act. However, it is possible that such initiatives could have an adverse effect on our ability to obtain approval and/or successfully commercialize products in the United States in the future. For example, any changes that reduce, or impede the ability to obtain, reimbursement for the type of products we intend to commercialize in the United States (or our products more specifically, if approved) or reduce medical procedure volumes could adversely affect our business plan to introduce our products in the United States.

In May 2017, the European parliament and the council of the European Union approved a new Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745 which has replaced the existing medical device directives (93/42/EEC). The new regulations will come into full application in May 2020. The new Medical Device Regulation imposes stricter requirements on medical device manufacturers and strengthens the supervising competences of the competent authorities of European Union member states, the notified bodies and the authorized representatives. As a result, the new legislation can prevent or delay the CE marking and certifications of our products under development or impact our ability to modify our currently CE marked products on a timely basis. If we fail to comply with the modified regulation and requirements it can adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects.

General Risk Factors

If we are unable to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection covering our products, others may be able to make, use or sell our products, which would adversely affect our revenue.

Our ability to protect our products from unauthorized or infringing use by third parties depends substantially on our ability to obtain and maintain valid and enforceable patents. Similarly, the ability to protect our trademark rights might be important to prevent third party counterfeiters from selling poor quality goods using our designated trademarks, and trade names. Due to evolving legal standards relating to the patentability, validity and enforceability of patents covering medical devices and pharmaceutical inventions and the scope of claims made under these patents, our ability to enforce patents is uncertain and involves complex legal and factual questions. Accordingly, rights under any of our pending patent applications and patents may not provide us with commercially meaningful protection for our products or may not afford a commercial advantage against our competitors or their competitive products or processes. In addition, patents may not be issued from any pending or future patent applications owned by or licensed to us, and moreover, patents that may be issued to us now or in the future may later be found invalid or unenforceable. Further, even if valid and enforceable, our patents may not be sufficiently broad to prevent others from marketing products like ours, despite our patent rights.

The validity of our patent claims depends, in part, on whether prior art references exist that describe or render obvious our inventions as of the filing date of our patent applications. We may not have identified all prior art, such as U.S. and foreign patents or published applications or published scientific literature, that could adversely affect the patentability of our issued patents and pending patent applications. For example, some material references may be in a foreign language and may not be uncovered during examination of our patent applications. Additionally, patent applications in the United States are maintained in confidence for up to 18 months after their filing. In some cases, however, patent applications remain confidential in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for the entire time prior to issuance as a U.S. patent. Patent applications filed in countries outside the U.S. are not typically published until at least 18 months from their first filing date. Similarly, publication of discoveries in the scientific or patent literature often lags behind actual discoveries. Therefore, we cannot be certain that we were the first to invent, or the first to file patent applications relating to, our stent technologies. Third parties may initiate adversarial proceedings, known as an inter-partes review (IPR) in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to challenge the validity of our patent claims in the United States. It is possible that we may be unsuccessful in the proceedings, resulting in a loss of some portion or all of our patent rights in the United States.

In addition, statutory differences in patentable subject matter among jurisdictions may limit the protection we can obtain on certain of the technologies we develop. The laws of some foreign jurisdictions do not offer the same protection to, or may make it more difficult to effect the enforcement of, proprietary rights as in the United States. This risk may be exacerbated if we move our manufacturing to certain countries in Asia. If we encounter such difficulties or are otherwise precluded from effectively protecting our intellectual property rights in any foreign jurisdictions, our business prospects could be substantially harmed.

Our initiation of litigation to enforce our patent rights may prompt adversaries in such litigation to challenge the validity, scope, ownership, or enforceability of our patents. Third parties can sometimes bring challenges against a patent holder to resolve these issues, as well. If a court decides that any such patents are not valid, not enforceable, not wholly owned by us, or are of a limited scope, we may not have the right to stop others from using our inventions. Also, even if our patent rights are determined by a court to be valid and enforceable, they may not be sufficiently broad to prevent others from marketing products similar to ours or designing around our patents, despite our patent rights, nor do they provide us with freedom to operate unimpeded by the patent and other intellectual property rights of others that may cover our products. We may be forced into litigation to uphold the validity of the claims in our patent portfolio, as well as our ownership rights to such intellectual property, and litigation is often an uncertain and costly process.

We may not be able to protect our trade secrets adequately. Although we rely on non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants and other parties to protect, in part, trade secrets and other proprietary technology, these agreements may be breached and we may not have adequate remedies for such breach. Moreover, others may independently develop equivalent proprietary information, and third parties may otherwise gain access to our trade secrets and proprietary knowledge. Any disclosure of confidential data into the public domain or to third parties could allow competitors to learn our trade secrets and use the information in competition against us.

We face risks associated with litigation and claims.

 

We may, in the future, be involved in one or more lawsuits, claims or other proceedings. These suits could concern issues including contract disputes, employment actions, employee benefits, taxes, environmental, health and safety, fraud and abuse, personal injury and product liability matters.

 

There are two lawsuits filed against us or InspireMD Ltd., one filed by Microbanc, LLCOur business and Todd Spenla of Microbanc, LLC in April 2016, seeking approximately $2.2 million and 9% of the amount of stock and warrants sold in 2011 and 2012 in alleged damages relating to certain alleged finders’ fees that they claim are owed, and another filed by Medpace Inc. in July 2016, seeking $1,967,822 in damages plus interest, costs, attorneys’ fees and expenses against InspireMD Ltd. See “Business — Legal Proceedings” for more information. Due to the uncertainties of litigation, however, we can give no assurance that we or InspireMD Ltd. will prevail on any claims made against us or InspireMD Ltd. in any such lawsuit. Also, we can give no assurance that any other lawsuits or claims broughtoperations would suffer in the future will notevent of computer system failures, cyber-attacks or deficiencies in our cyber-security.

In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, research data, our proprietary business information and that of our suppliers, technical information about our products, clinical trial plans and employee records. Similarly, our third-party providers possess certain of our sensitive data and confidential information. The secure maintenance of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy. Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems, and those of third parties on which we rely, are vulnerable to damage from computer viruses, malware, ransomware, cyber fraud, natural disasters, terrorism, war, telecommunication and electrical failures, cyber-attacks or cyber-intrusions over the Internet, attachments to emails, persons inside our organization, or persons with access to systems inside our organization. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments, and cyber terrorists, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have an adverse effect onincreased. Any such breach could compromise our financial condition, liquiditynetworks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, encrypted, lost or operating results. Adverse outcomes in somestolen. Any such access, inappropriate disclosure of confidential or allproprietary information or other loss of these claims mayinformation, including our data being breached at third-party providers, could result in significant monetary damageslegal claims or proceedings, liability or financial loss under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, disruption of our operations or our product development programs and damage to our reputation, which could adversely affect our abilitybusiness. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or ongoing or planned clinical trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to conduct our business.

recover or reproduce the data.

The successfulloss of key members of our senior management team or our inability to attract and retain highly skilled scientists and laboratory and field personnel could adversely affect our business.

We depend on the skills, experience and performance of our senior management and research personnel. The efforts of each of these persons will be critical to us as we continue to further develop our products, increase sales and broaden our product offerings. If we were to lose one or more of these key employees, we may experience difficulties in competing effectively, developing our technologies and implementing our business strategies. Our research and development programs and commercial laboratory operations dependsdepend on our ability to attract and retain talented personnel.

highly skilled scientists and technicians. We depend onmay not be able to attract or retain qualified scientists and technicians in the expertise of our senior management and research personnel, which would be difficultfuture due to replace. The loss of the services of any of our senior management could compromise our ability to achieve our objectives. Furthermore, recruiting and retainingintense competition for qualified personnel will be crucial to future success.among life science businesses. There can be no assurance that we will be able to attract and retain necessary personnel on acceptable terms given the intense competition among medical device, biotechnology, pharmaceutical and healthcare companies, universities and non-profit research institutions for experienced management, scientists, researchers, sales and marketing and manufacturing personnel. If we are unable to attract, retain and motivate our key personnel to accomplish our business objectives, we may experience constraints that will adversely affect our ability to support our operations, may be jeopardized and our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

 

We are an international business, and we are exposed to various global and local risks that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

We operate globally and develop and market products in multiple countries. Consequently, we face complex legal and regulatory requirements in multiple jurisdictions, which may expose us to certain financial and other risks. In addition, we are subject to global events beyond our control, including war, public health crises, such as pandemics and epidemics, trade disputes and other international events. Any of these changes could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition or results of operations.

For example, the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected most of the world, including each of our primary markets, resulting in, among other things, government-imposed quarantines and other public health safety measures. At this point, the extent to which the coronavirus may impact our business cannot be estimated; however, procedures with CGuard EPS, which are generally scheduled or non-emergency procedures, have seen extended postponements since the onset of COVID-19 as hospitals shift resources to patients affected by the coronavirus, and it is highly plausible that this trend will continue. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the coronavirus, the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, the efficacy and scale of the various vaccines currently deployed across the world, among others. Moreover, COVID-19 has had indeterminable adverse effects on general commercial activity and the world economy, and our business and results of operations could be adversely affected to the extent that COVID-19 or any other epidemic continues to harm the global economy generally.

International sales and operations are subject to a variety of risks, including:

 

 foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;
 greater difficulty in staffing and managing foreign operations;
 greater risk of uncollectible accounts;
   
 longer collection cycles;
   
 logistical and communications challenges;
   
 potential adverse changes in laws and regulatory practices, including export license requirements, trade barriers, tariffs and tax laws;
   
 changes in labor conditions;
   
 burdens and costs of compliance with a variety of foreign laws;
   
 political and economic instability;
   
 the escalation of hostilities in Israel, which could impair our ability to manufacture our products;
   
 increases in duties and taxation;
   
 foreign tax laws and potential increased costs associated with overlapping tax structures;
   
 greater difficulty in protecting intellectual property;
   
 the risk of third party disputes over ownership of intellectual property and infringement of third party intellectual property by our products; and
   
 general economic and political conditions in these foreign markets.

 

Further, in the past, the State of Israel and Israeli companies have been subjected to an economic boycott. Several countries still restrict business and trade activity with the State of Israel and with Israeli companies. Since our principal operating subsidiary is an Israeli corporation, these restrictive laws and policies may have an adverse impact on our operating results, financial condition or the expansion of our business.

International markets are also affected by economic pressure to contain reimbursement levels and healthcare costs. Profitability from international operations may be limited by risks and uncertainties related to regional economic conditions, regulatory and reimbursement approvals, competing products, infrastructure development, intellectual property rights protection and our ability to implement our overall business strategy. We expect these risks will increase as we pursue our strategy to expand operations into new geographic markets. We may not succeed in developing and implementing effective policies and strategies in each location where we conduct business. Any failure to do so may harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Risks Related to Our Securities and this Offering

The market prices of our common stock and our publicly traded warrants are subject to fluctuation and have been and may continue to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses for investors.

The market prices of our common stock and our Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants have been and are likely to continue to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:

technological innovations or new products and services by us or our competitors;
additions or departures of key personnel;
our ability to execute our business plan;
operating results that fall below expectations;
loss of any strategic relationship;
industry developments;
economic, political and other external factors; and
period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results.

In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies.

Our Planned Reverse Split may not result in a proportional increase in the per share price of our common stock.

Following this offering, we intend to effect the Planned Reverse Split with the primary intent of increasing the price of our common stock in order to meet the initial listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market and, secondly, to provide appropriate flexibility we require to issue shares in the event that our board of directors determines that it is necessary or appropriate to (i) raise additional capital through the sale of equity securities, (ii) enter into strategic business transactions, (iii) provide equity incentives to directors, officers and employees pursuant to equity compensation plans or (iv) further other corporate purposes. The effect of the Planned Reverse Split on the market price for our common stock cannot be accurately predicted. In particular, we cannot assure you that the proportionate increase in the price of our common stock immediately after the Planned Reverse Split from the price for shares of our common stock immediately before the Planned Reverse Split will be maintained for us to meet the initial listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market or that the such market prices will be maintained for a substantial period of time. It is not uncommon for the market price of a company’s common stock to decline in the period following a reverse stock split. If the market price of our common stock declines following the Planned Reverse Split, the percentage decline may be greater than would occur in the absence of the Planned Reverse Split. The market price of our common stock may also be affected by other factors which may be unrelated to the Planned Reverse Split or the number of shares outstanding.

Moreover, because some investors may view the Planned Reverse Split negatively, we cannot assure you that the Planned Reverse Split will not adversely impact the market price of our common stock. Accordingly, our total market capitalization after the Planned Reverse Split may be lower than the market capitalization before the Planned Reverse Split.

Our common stock could be delisted from the NYSE American if we fail to obtain an adequatemeet the NYSE American’s stockholders’ equity continued listing standards. Our ability to publicly or privately sell equity securities and the liquidity of our common stock could be adversely affected if we are delisted from the NYSE American.

On August 7, 2019, we received a notice indicating that we do not meet certain of the NYSE American’s continued listing standards as set forth in Part 10 of the Company Guide. Specifically, we were not in compliance with Section 1003(a)(iii) of the Company Guide because we reported stockholders’ equity of less than $6 million as of June 30, 2019, and had net losses in our five most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2018. As a result, we had become subject to the procedures and requirements of Section 1009 of the Company Guide. On August 25, 2019, we submitted a plan of compliance to NYSE Regulation, addressing how we intend to regain compliance with Section 1003(a)(iii) of the Company Guide by August 7, 2020, and on October 11, 2019, NYSE American accepted our plan. On August 7, 2020, the NYSE American approved such plan and, accordingly and as of such date, we are compliant with all of the NYSE American LLC continued listing standards set forth in Part 10 of the NYSE American Company Guide. In particular, we regained compliance with the continued listing requirement under NYSE American Company Guide Section 1003(a)(iii). The return to compliance was achieved as a result of our recently-consummated public offering, in which we raised approximately $10.7 million of net proceeds from the sale of units and pre-funded units.

Notwithstanding NYSE American’s approval of our plan, there is no assurance that we will be able to maintain compliance with Section 1003(a)(iii) of the Company Guide moving forward. Additionally, we will be subject to ongoing review for compliance with NYSE American requirements and there can be no assurance that we will continue to remain in compliance with this standard.

In the event the NYSE American issues a future notice and recommences proceedings against us, delisting from NYSE American would adversely affect our ability to raise additional financing through the public or private sale of equity securities, would significantly affect the ability of investors to trade our securities and would negatively affect the value and liquidity of our common stock. Delisting could also have additional negative ramifications, including the potential loss of confidence by employees, the loss of institutional investor interest and fewer business development opportunities.

A low trading price could lead the NYSE American to take actions toward delisting our common stock, including immediately suspending trading in our common stock.

On January 7, 2019, we received notification from the NYSE American that our shares of common stock have been selling for a low price per share for a substantial period of time. Pursuant to Section 1003(f)(v) of the Company Guide, the NYSE American could take action to delist our common stock in the event that our common stock trades at levels viewed as abnormally low for a substantial period of time. NYSE American advised us that if our common stock trades below $0.20 on a 30 trading day average, then it will be considered non-compliant with NYSE American’s low selling price requirement. On March 29, 2019, we effected a 1-for-50 reverse stock split of our common stock.

If in the future we fall below the continued listing criterion of a minimum average share price of $0.20 over a 30-day trading period, our common stock will be subject to immediate review by NYSE American. There can be no assurance that the market price of our common stock will remain above the levels viewed as abnormally low for a substantial period of time. In any event, other factors unrelated to the number of shares of our common stock outstanding, such as negative financial or operational results, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock, causing it to fall below the level viewed as a low selling price for a substantial period of reimbursementtime, and lead the NYSE American to immediately suspend trading in our common stock.

In addition, the NYSE American has advised us that its policy is to immediately suspend trading in shares of, and commence delisting procedures with respect to, a listed company if the market price of its shares falls below $0.06 per share at any time during the trading day.

If you purchase our securities sold in this offering you may experience immediate dilution in your investment as a result of this offering.

Because the effective price per share of common stock being offered or issuable upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants, or exercise of the Series G warrants being offered in this offering may be substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share of our common stock, you may experience substantial dilution to the extent of the difference between the effective offering price per share of common stock you pay in this offering and the net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after this offering. Our net tangible book value as of September 30, 2020, was approximately $11.3 million, or $0.31 per share of common stock. Net tangible book value per share is equal to our total tangible assets minus total liabilities, all divided by the number of shares of common stock outstanding. See “Dilution” on page 40 below for a more detailed discussion of the dilution you may incur if you participate in this offering.

Furthermore, the anti-dilution provisions of our Series B and C Preferred Stock may result in further dilution of your investment (see “Risk Factors — Risks Related Our Securities and this OfferingIf the effective price per share of common stock included in the units being offered…”).

If the effective price per share of common stock included in the units being offered or issuable upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants included in the pre-funded units being offered in this offering is less than the respective current conversion price of our Series B or Series C Preferred Stock, we will be required to issue additional shares of common stock, as applicable, to the holders of the preferred stock, which will be dilutive to all of our other stockholders, including new investors in this offering.

The respective certificate of designation for our products by third party payors,Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock contains anti-dilution provisions, which provisions require the lowering of the applicable conversion price, as then in effect, to the purchase price of equity or equity-linked securities issued in subsequent offerings. In accordance with this anti-dilution price protection, because the effective common stock purchase price in each of the March 2018 public offering, the April 2018 public offering, the July 2018 public offering, the April 2019 public offering and the September 2019 public offering, was below the then current Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock conversion price, we reduced the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock conversion price upon pricing of each such public offering. As a result of these obligations, if the effective price per share of common stock included in the units being offered or issuable upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants included in the pre-funded units being offered in this offering is less than the respective current conversion price of our Series B or Series C Preferred Stock, each of these conversion prices shall be reduced to the effective price per share of common stock included in the units being offered or issuable upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants included in the pre-funded units being offered in this offering. This reduction in the conversion prices will result in a greater number of shares of common stock being issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock for no additional consideration, causing greater dilution to our stockholders and investors in this offering. In addition, should we issue any securities following this offering at an effective common stock purchase price that is less than the then effective conversion price of our Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock, we will be required to further reduce the conversion prices of our Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, which will result in a greater dilutive effect on our stockholders. Furthermore, as there is no floor price on the conversion price, we cannot determine the total number of shares issuable upon conversion. As such, it is possible that we may not have a sufficient number of authorized and available shares to satisfy the conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock or the Series C Preferred Stock if we enter into a future transaction that reduces the applicable conversion price. The foregoing features will increase the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion, assuming that the effective offering price of our common stock in a subsequent financing is lower than the conversion price of these securities then in effect, of the Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock for no additional consideration, and will result in a greater dilutive effect on our stockholders.

Purchasers in this offering may experience additional dilution of their investment in the future.

Subject to lock-up provisions described under “Underwriting,” we are generally not restricted from issuing additional securities, including shares of common stock, securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common stock or substantially similar securities. In particular, we may conduct one or more additional offerings following this offering and may seek waiver of the lock-up provisions described under “Underwriting” to conduct such offerings. The issuance of securities in these or any other offerings may cause further dilution to our stockholders, including investors in this offering. In order to raise additional capital, such securities may be no commercially viable marketsat prices that are not the same as the price per share in this offering. We cannot assure you that we will be able to sell shares or other securities in any other offering at a price per share that is equal to or greater than the price per share paid by investors in this offering, and investors purchasing shares or other securities in the future could have rights superior to existing stockholders, including investors who purchase securities in this offering. The price per share at which we sell additional shares of our common stock or securities convertible into common stock in future transactions may be higher or lower than the price per share in this offering. The exercise of outstanding stock options and the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units may also result in further dilution of your investment.

Offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our productscommon stock may cause the price of our publicly traded securities to decline.

Sales of a significant number of shares of our common stock or our warrants in the public market could harm the market prices of our common stock or warrants and make it more difficult for us to raise funds through future offerings of common stock or warrants. Our stockholders and the holders of our options and warrants may sell substantial amounts of our common stock or our publicly traded warrants in the public market. In addition, we will be required to issue additional shares of common stock to the holders of our Series B Preferred Stock upon conversion of shares of our Series B Preferred Stock and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock and to the holders of our Series C Preferred Stock upon conversion of such shares of our Series C Preferred Stock, as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the respective certificate of designation for the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock, if the effective common stock purchase price in a subsequent offering is less than the respective then current conversion price of the Series B Preferred Stock or the marketsSeries C Preferred Stock, which in turn will increase the number of shares of common stock available for sale. See “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Securities and this Offering — If the effective price per share of common stock included in the units being offered…”

In addition, the fact that our stockholders, option holders and warrant holders can sell substantial amounts of our common stock or our publicly traded warrants in the public market, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, could make it more difficult for us to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate, or at all.

We do not expect to pay dividends in the future. As a result, any return on investment may be much smallerlimited to the value of our common stock.

We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends on our common stock will depend on our earnings, financial condition and other business and economic factors as our board of directors may consider relevant. If we do not pay dividends, our common stock may be less valuable because a return on an investment in our common stock will only occur if our stock price appreciates.

The Series B Preferred Stock provides for the payment of dividends in cash or in shares of our common stock, and we may not be permitted to pay such dividends in cash, which will require us to have shares of common stock available to pay the dividends.

Each share of the Series B Preferred Stock is entitled to receive cumulative dividends at the rate per share of 15% per annum of the stated value per share, until the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock, which is July 7, 2021. The dividends are payable, at our discretion, in cash, out of any funds legally available for such purpose, or in pay-in-kind shares of common stock calculated based on the conversion price, subject to adjustment as provided in the certificate of designation for the Series B Preferred Stock. The conversion price is subject to reduction if in the future we issue securities for less than expected.the conversion price of our Series B Preferred Stock, as then in effect. As there is no floor price on the conversion price, we cannot determine the total number of shares issuable upon conversion or in connection with the dividend. It is possible that we will not have a sufficient number of available shares to pay the dividend in common stock, which would require the payment of the dividend in cash. We will not be permitted to pay the dividend in cash unless we are legally permitted to do so under Delaware law, which requires cash to be available from surplus or net profits, which may not be available at the time payment is due. In light of our recurring losses and negative cash flows from operating activities, we do not expect to have cash available to pay the dividends on our Series B Preferred Stock or to be permitted to make such payments under Delaware law, and will be relying on having available shares of common stock to pay such dividends, which will result in dilution to our stockholders. If we do not have such available shares, we may not be able to satisfy our dividend obligations.

Our management team may invest or spend the proceeds of this offering in ways with which you may not agree or in ways which may not yield a significant return.

Our management will have broad discretion over the use of proceeds from this offering. We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering primarily for purposes of financing our pivotal clinical trial in connection with the CGuard EPS and other general corporate purposes. However, our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds from this offering and could spend the proceeds in ways that do not improve our results of operations or enhance the value of our common stock. The failure by management to apply these funds effectively could result in financial losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business and cause the price of our common stock to decline.

There is no public market for the pre-funded warrants or the Series G Warrants being offered by us in this offering.

There is no established public trading market for the pre-funded warrants or the Series G Warrants and we do not expect a market to develop. In addition, we do not intend to apply to list the pre-funded warrants or the Series G Warrants on any national securities exchange or other nationally recognized trading system, including the NYSE American. Without an active market, the liquidity of the pre-funded warrants and the Series G Warrants will be limited, which may adversely affect their value.

Holders of pre-funded warrants or Series G Warrants purchased in this offering will have no rights as common stockholders until such holders exercise their pre-funded warrants or Series G Warrants and acquire our common stock.

Until holders of pre-funded warrants or Series G Warrants acquire shares of our common stock upon exercise thereof, such holders will have no rights with respect to the shares of our common stock underlying the pre-funded warrants and Series G Warrants. Upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants or Series G Warrants, the holders will be entitled to exercise the rights of a common stockholder only as to matters for which the record date occurs after the exercise date.

Series G Warrants are speculative in nature.

 

The availabilitySeries G Warrants do not confer any rights of common stock ownership on its holders, such as voting rights or the right to receive dividends, but rather merely represent the right to acquire shares of common stock at a fixed price for a limited period of time. Specifically, commencing on the date of issuance, holders of the Series G Warrants may exercise their right to acquire the common stock and levelspay an exercise price of reimbursement by governmental$0.84 per share of common stock, subject to certain adjustments, prior to five years from the date of issuance, after which date any unexercised Series G Warrants will expire and other third party payors affecthave no further value. Moreover, following this offering, the market value of the Series G Warrants, if any, is uncertain and there can be no assurance that the market value of the Series G Warrants will equal or exceed their imputed offering price. The Series G Warrants will not be listed or quoted for trading on any market or exchange. There can be no assurance that the market price of the common stock will ever equal or exceed the exercise price of the Series G Warrants, and consequently, it may not ever be profitable for holders of the Series G Warrants to exercise the Series G Warrants.

Delaware law and our products. The efficacy, safety, performancecorporate charter and cost-effectivenessbylaws contain anti-takeover provisions that could delay or discourage takeover attempts that stockholders may consider favorable.

Our board of our products anddirectors is authorized to issue shares of any competing products will determine the availability and level of reimbursement. Reimbursement and healthcare payment systemspreferred stock in international markets vary significantly by country, and include both government sponsored healthcare and private insurance. To obtain reimbursement or pricing approval in some countries, we may be required to produce clinical data, which may involve one or more clinical trials,series and to fix the voting powers, preferences and other rights and limitations of the preferred stock. Accordingly, we may issue shares of preferred stock with a preference over our common stock with respect to dividends or distributions on liquidation or dissolution, or that comparesmay otherwise adversely affect the cost-effectivenessvoting or other rights of the holders of common stock. Issuances of preferred stock, depending upon the rights, preferences and designations of the preferred stock, may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change of control, even if that change of control might benefit our productsstockholders. In addition, we are subject to other available therapies. We may not obtain international reimbursement or pricing approvalsSection 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Section 203 generally prohibits a public Delaware corporation from engaging in a timely manner, if at all. Our failure“business combination” with an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless (i) prior to receive international reimbursementthe date of the transaction, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or pricing approvals would negatively impact market acceptance of our productsthe transaction which resulted in the international marketsstockholder becoming an interested stockholder; (ii) the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the number of shares outstanding (a) shares owned by persons who are directors and also officers and (b) shares owned by employee stock plans in which those approvals are sought.

We believe that future reimbursement may beemployee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to increased restrictions boththe plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or (iii) on or subsequent to the U.S. and in international markets. Theredate of the transaction, the business combination is increasing pressure by governments worldwide to contain health care costs by limiting both the coverage and the level of reimbursement for therapeutic products and by refusing, in some cases, to provide any coverage for products that have not been approved by the relevant regulatory agency. Future legislation, regulationboard and authorized at an annual or reimbursement policiesspecial meeting of third party payorsstockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the interested stockholder.

Section 203 could delay or prohibit mergers or other takeover or change in control attempts with respect to us and, accordingly, may adversely affectdiscourage attempts to acquire us even though such a transaction may offer our stockholders the demand for our products and limit our abilityopportunity to sell our products ontheir stock at a profitable basis. In addition, third party payors continuallyprice above the prevailing market price.

We have a staggered board of directors, which could impede an attempt to containacquire us or reduce the costsremove our management.

Our board of healthcare by challenging the prices chargeddirectors is divided into three classes, each of which serves for healthcare products and services. If reimbursement for our products is unavailable or limited in scope or amount or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, market acceptancea staggered term of three years. This division of our products wouldboard of directors could have the effect of impeding an attempt to take over our company or change or remove management, since only one class will be impaired and future revenues, ifelected annually. Thus, only approximately one-third of the existing board of directors could be replaced at any would be adversely affected.election of directors.

 

InAs a former shell company, resales of shares of our restricted common stock in reliance on Rule 144 of the United StatesSecurities Act are subject to the requirements of Rule 144(i).

We previously were a “shell company” and, inas such, sales of our securities pursuant to Rule 144 under the European Union, our business couldSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, cannot be significantlymade unless, among other things, at the time of a proposed sale, we are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and adversely affected by healthcare reform legislationhave filed all reports and other administration and legislative proposals.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act were enacted into law in the United States in March 2010 and are known collectively as the “Affordable Care Act.” Certain provisions of these acts are not yet fully implemented and it is unclear what the full impact willmaterials required to be from the legislation. The legislation levies a 2.3% excise tax, that began on January 1, 2013, on all sales of any U.S. medical device listed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration underfiled by Section 510(j)13 or 15(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and CosmeticSecurities Exchange Act and 21 C.F.R. Part 807, unlessof 1934 as amended, as applicable, during the device falls withinpreceding 12 months, other than Form 8-K reports. Because, as a former shell company, the reporting requirements of Rule 144(i) will apply regardless of holding period, restrictive legends on certificates for shares of our common stock cannot be removed except in connection with an actual sale that is subject to an effective registration statement under, or an applicable exemption from the tax,registration requirements of, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Because our unregistered securities cannot be sold pursuant to Rule 144 unless we continue to meet such as the exemption governing direct retail sale of devicesrequirements, any unregistered securities we issue will have limited liquidity unless we continue to consumers comply with such requirements.

If securities and/or for foreign sales of these devices. If we commence sales of our MGuard Prime EPS or CGuard EPS stent in the United States, this new tax may materially and adversely affectindustry analysts fail to continue publishing research about our business, andif they change their recommendations adversely or if our results of operations. operations do not meet their expectations, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The legislation also focuses on a number of provisions aimed at improving quality, broadening access to health insurance, enhancing remedies for fraud and abuse, adding transparency requirements, and decreasing healthcare costs , among others . Uncertainties remain regarding what negative unintended consequences these provisions will have on patient access to new technologies, pricing and thetrading market for our products,common stock will be influenced by the research and the healthcarereports that industry in general . The Affordable Care Act includes provisions affecting the Medicare program, such as value-based payment programs, increased fundingor securities analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of comparative effectiveness research, reduced hospital payments for avoidable readmissions and hospital acquired conditions, and pilot programsthese analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to evaluate alternative payment methodologies that promote care coordination (such as bundled physician and hospital payments). Additionally, the provisions include a reductionpublish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the annual ratefinancial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline. In addition, it is likely that in some future period our operating results will be below the expectations of inflation for hospitals which started in 2011 and the establishment of an independent payment advisory board to recommend ways of reducing the rate of growth in Medicare spending. Any reduction in reimbursement from Medicaresecurities analysts or other government programs may result in a similar reduction in payments from private payors. Judicial challenges as well as legislative initiatives to modify, limit,investors. If one or repeal the Affordable Care Act have been initiated and continue, including a recent Executive Order signed by the U.S. president directing executive departments and federal agencies to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of provisionsmore of the Affordable Care Act that would impose a fiscalanalysts who cover us downgrade our stock, or regulatory burden on individuals and certain entities to the maximum extent permitted by law. The challenges to the Affordable Care Act and efforts to repeal or replace the legislation may increase in lightif our results of the change in presidential administrations and U.S. Congress . We cannot predict what healthcare programs and regulations will be implemented or changed at the federal or state level in the United States, or the effect of any future legislation or regulation. However, any changes that lower reimbursements foroperations do not meet their expectations, our products or reduce medical procedure volumesstock price could adversely affect our business plan to introduce our products in the United States.decline.

 

On September 26, 2012, the European Commission adopted a package of legislative proposals designed to replace the existing regulatory framework governing medical devices in the European Union. These proposals are currently being reviewed by the European Parliament and the Council and may undergo significant amendments as part of the legislative process. If adopted by the European Parliament and the Council in their present form, these proposed revisions would, among other things, impose stricter requirements on medical device manufacturers and strengthen the supervising competences of the competent authorities of European Union Member States and the notified bodies. As a result, if and when adopted, the proposed new legislation could prevent or delay the CE marking of our products under development or impact our ability to modify our currently CE marked products on a timely basis. The regulation of advanced therapy medicinal products is also in continued development in the European Union, with the European Medicines Agency publishing new clinical or safety guidelines concerning advanced therapy medicinal products on a regular basis. Any of these regulatory changes and events could limit our ability to form collaborations and our ability to continue to commercialize our products, and if we fail to comply with any such new or modified regulations and requirements it could adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects.

Risks Related to Operating in Israel

 

We anticipate being subject to fluctuations in currency exchange rates because we expect a substantial portion of our revenues will be generated in Euros and U.S. dollars, while a significant portion of our expenses will be incurred in New Israeli Shekels.

 

We expect a substantial portion of our revenues will be generated in U.S. dollars and Euros, while a significant portion of our expenses, principally salaries and related personnel expenses, is paid in New Israeli Shekels, or NIS. As a result, we are exposed to the risk that the rate of inflation in Israel will exceed the rate of devaluation of the NIS in relation to the Euro or the U.S. dollar, or that the timing of this devaluation will lag behind inflation in Israel. Because inflation has the effect of increasing the dollar and Euro costs of our operations, it would therefore have an adverse effect on our dollar-measured results of operations. The value of the NIS, against the Euro, the U.S. dollar, and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in Israel’s political and economic conditions. Any significant revaluation of the NIS may materially and adversely affect our cash flows, revenues and financial condition. Fluctuations in the NIS exchange rate, or even the appearance of instability in such exchange rate, could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.

If there are significant shifts in the political, economic and military conditions in Israel and its neighbors, it could have a material adverse effect on our business relationships and profitability.

 

Our executive office, sole manufacturing facility and certain of our key personnel are located in Israel. Our business is directly affected by the political, economic and military conditions in Israel and its neighbors. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have occurred between Israel and its Arab neighbors. A state of hostility, varying in degree and intensity, has caused security and economic problems in Israel. Although Israel has entered into peace treaties with Egypt and Jordan, and various agreements with the Palestinian Authority, there has been a marked increase in violence, civil unrest and hostility, including armed clashes, between the State of Israel and the Palestinians since September 2000. The establishment in 2006 of a government in the Gaza Strip by representatives of the Hamas militant group has created heightened unrest and uncertainty in the region. In mid-2006, Israel engaged in an armed conflict with Hezbollah, a Shiite Islamist militia group based in Lebanon, and in June 2007, there was an escalation in violence in the Gaza Strip. From December 2008 through January 2009 and again in November and December 2012, Israel engaged in an armed conflict with Hamas, which involved missile strikes against civilian targets in various parts of Israel and negatively affected business conditions in Israel. In July and August 2014, an armed conflict took place between Israel launchedand Hamas, and since September 2015, there has been an additional operation against Hamas operativesincrease in the Gaza strip in response to Palestinian groups launching rockets at Israel. Recent politicalsporadic terror incidents conducted by individuals not necessarily associated with terror organizations. Political uprisings and social unrest in Syria are affecting its political stability, which has led to the deterioration of the political relationship between Syria and Israel and have raised new concerns regarding security in the region and the potential for armed conflict. Similar civil unrest and political turbulence is currently ongoing in many countries in the region. The continued political instability and hostilities between Israel and its neighbors and any future armed conflict, terrorist activity or political instability in the region could adversely affect our operations in Israel and adversely affect the market price of our shares of common stock. In addition, several countries restrict doing business with Israel and Israeli companies have been and are today subjected to economic boycotts. The interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its present trading partners could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

In addition, many of our officers or key employees may be called to active duty at any time under emergency circumstances for extended periods of time. See “— Our operations could be disrupted as a result of the obligation of certain of our personnel residing in Israel to perform military service.”

 

Our operations could be disrupted as a result of the obligation of certain of our personnel residing in Israel to perform military service.

 

Many of our officers and employees reside in Israel and may be required to perform annual military reserve duty. Currently, all male adult citizens and permanent residents of Israel under the age of 40 (or older, depending on their position with the Israeli Defense Forces reserves), unless exempt, are obligated to perform military reserve duty annually and are subject to being called to active duty at any time under emergency circumstances. Our operations could be disrupted by the absence for a significant period of one or more of our key officers and employees due to military service. Any such disruption could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may not be able to enforce covenants not-to-compete under current Israeli law.

 

We have non-competition agreements with most of our employees, many of which are governed by Israeli law. These agreements generally prohibit our employees from competing with us or working for our competitors for a specified period following termination of their employment. However, Israeli courts are reluctant to enforce non-compete undertakings of former employees and tend, if at all, to enforce those provisions for relatively brief periods of time in restricted geographical areas and only when the employee has unique value specific to that employer’s business and not just regarding the professional development of the employee. Any such inability to enforce non-compete covenants may cause us to lose any competitive advantage resulting from advantages provided to us by such confidential information.

We may become subject to claims for remuneration or royalties for assigned service invention rights by our employees, which could result in litigation and adversely affect our business.

 

A significant portion of our intellectual property has been developed by our Israeli employees in the course of their employment for us. Under the Israeli Patent Law, 5727-1967 (the “Israeli Patent Law”), inventions conceived by an employee during the term and as part of the scope of his or her employment with a company are regarded as “service inventions,” which belong to the employer, absent a specific agreement between the employee and employer giving the employee service invention rights. The Israeli Patent Law also provides that if there is no such agreement between an employer and an employee, the Israeli Compensation and Royalties Committee (the “C&R Committee”), a body constituted under the Israeli Patent Law, shall determine whether the employee is entitled to remuneration for his inventions. The C&R Committee (decisions of which have been upheld by the Israeli Supreme Court) has held that employees may be entitled to remuneration for their service inventions despite having specifically waived any such rights. Further, the C&R Committee has not yet set specific guidelines regarding the method for calculating this remuneration or the criteria or circumstances under which an employee’s waiver of his right to remuneration will be disregarded. We generally enter into intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees pursuant to which such employees assign to us all rights to any inventions created in the scope of their employment or engagement with us. Although our employees have agreed to assign to us service invention rights and have specifically waived their right to receive any special remuneration for such assignment beyond their regular salary and benefits, we may face claims demanding remuneration in consideration for assigned inventions. As a consequence of such claims, we could be required to pay additional remuneration or royalties to our current or former employees, or be forced to litigate such claims, which could negatively affect our business.

 

It may be difficult for investors in the United States to enforce any judgments obtained against us or some of our directors or officers.

 

The majority of our assets other than cash are located outside the U.S. In addition, certain of our officers are nationals and/or residents of countries other than the U.S., and all or a substantial portion of such persons’ assets are located outside the U.S. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against us or any of our non-U.S. officers, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the U.S. or any state thereof. Additionally, it may be difficult to assert U.S. securities law claims in actions originally instituted outside of the U.S. Israeli courts may refuse to hear a U.S. securities law claim because Israeli courts may not be the most appropriate forums in which to bring such a claim. Even if an Israeli court agrees to hear a claim, it may determine that the Israeli law, and not U.S. law, is applicable to the claim. Further, if U.S. law is found to be applicable, certain content of applicable U.S. law must be proved as a fact, which can be a time-consuming and costly process, and certain matters of procedure would still be governed by the Israeli law. Consequently, you may be effectively prevented from pursuing remedies under U.S. federal and state securities laws against us or any of our non-U.S. directors or officers.

 

The tax benefits that are currently available to us under Israeli law require us to satisfy specified conditions. If we fail to satisfy these conditions, we may be required to pay increased taxes and would likely be denied these benefits in the future.

 

InspireMD Ltd., our wholly owned subsidiary, has been granted a “Beneficiary Enterprise” status by the Investment Center in the Israeli Ministry of Industry Trade and Labor, and we are therefore eligible for tax benefits under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959. The main benefit is a two-year exemption from corporate tax, commencing when we begin to generate net income derived from the beneficiary activities in facilities located in Israel, and a reduced corporate tax rate for an additional five to eight years, depending on the level of foreign investment in each year. In addition, under the January 1, 2011 amendment to the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959, a uniform corporate tax rate of 16% applies to all qualifying income of “Preferred Enterprise,” which we may be able to apply as an alternative tax benefit.

The tax benefits available to a Beneficiary Enterprise or a Preferred Enterprise are dependent upon the fulfillment of conditions stipulated under the Israeli Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 and its regulations, as amended, which include, among other things, maintaining our manufacturing facilities in Israel. If we fail to comply with these conditions, in whole or in part, the tax benefits could be cancelled and we could be required to refund any tax benefits that we received in the past. If we are no longer eligible for these tax benefits, our Israeli taxable income would be subject to regular Israeli corporate tax rates. The standard corporate tax rate for Israeli companies in 20162019 and thereafter is 25% and in 2017 is 24%23% of taxable income. The termination or reduction of these tax benefits would increase our tax liability, which would reduce our profits.

In addition to losing eligibility for tax benefits currently available to us under Israeli law, if we do not maintain our manufacturing facilities in Israel, we will not be able to realize certain tax credits and deferred tax assets, if any, including any net operating losses to offset against future profits.

 

The tax benefits available to Beneficiary Enterprises may be reduced or eliminated in the future. This would likely increase our tax liability.

 

The Israeli government may reduce or eliminate in the future tax benefits available to Beneficiary Enterprises and Preferred Enterprises. Our Beneficiary Enterprise status and the resulting tax benefits may not continue in the future at their current levels or at any level. The tax benefit period is twelve years from the year of election, which means that after a year of election, the two-year exemption and eight years of reduced tax rate can only be used within the next twelve years. The Company elected the year 2007, as a year of election and 2011 as an additional year of election. The 2011 amendment regarding Preferred Enterprise may not be applicable to us or may not fully compensate us for the change. The termination or reduction of these tax benefits would likely increase our tax liability. The amount, if any, by which our tax liability would increase will depend upon the rate of any tax increase, the amount of any tax benefit reduction, and the amount of any taxable income that we may earn in the future.

 

Risks Related to Our Organization and Our Common Stock, Preferred Stock, Warrants and this Offering

The market prices of our common stock and our publicly traded warrants are subject to fluctuation and have been and may continue to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses for investors.

The market prices of our common stock and our Series A Warrants have been and are likely to continue to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:

technological innovations or new products and services by us or our competitors;
additions or departures of key personnel;
our ability to execute our business plan;
operating results that fall below expectations;
loss of any strategic relationship;
industry developments;
economic, political and other external factors; and
period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results.

In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also significantly affect the market prices of our common stock and our publicly traded warrants.

If you purchase the securities sold in this offering, and assuming conversion of the Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock, you will experience immediate and substantial dilution in your investment.

Since the price per share of our Preferred Stock being offered in this offering exceeds the net tangible book value per share of our common stock outstanding prior to this offering, you will suffer immediate and substantial dilution with respect to the net tangible book value of the Preferred Stock included in the units you purchase in this offering, assuming conversion of the Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock. After giving effect to (i) the sale by us of all 750,000 units covered by this prospectus, based on an assumed public offering price of $10.00 per unit , and deducting estimated placement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses payable by us and assuming conversion of the Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock at an assumed conversion price of $2.50 per share of common stock, and (ii) the additional shares of common stock that we will be required to issue to the holders of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock because the effective common stock purchase price in this offering is less than the current Series B Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price of $8.25 (see “Risk Factors — Risks Related toOur Organization and Our Common Stock, Preferred Stock, Warrants and this Offering—Because the effective common stock purchase price in this offering is less than the current Series B Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price of $8.25, we will be required to issue additional shares of common stock to the holders of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, which will be dilutive to all of our other stockholders, including new investors in this offering.”), you will experience immediate dilution of $1.38 per share of common stock, representing the difference between our as adjusted net tangible book value per share of common stock as of December 31 , 2016, and the conversion price of the Preferred Stock. If any outstanding options or warrants are exercised, you could experience further dilution. For the purpose of this calculation, the entire purchase price for the units is being allocated to the shares of Preferred Stock, and shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants have not been included. Furthermore, the exercise of outstanding warrants and options may result in further dilution of your investment. See the section entitled “Dilution” on page 34 for a more detailed illustration of the dilution you will incur if you participate in this offering.

A continued low trading price could lead the NYSE MKT to take actions toward delisting our common stock, including immediately suspending trading in our common stock.

Pursuant to Section 1003(f)(v) of the NYSE MKT Company Guide (the “Company Guide”), the NYSE MKT could take action to delist our common stock in the event that our common stock trades at levels viewed as abnormally low for a substantial period of time. In addition, the NYSE MKT has advised us that its policy is to immediately suspend trading in shares of, and commence delisting procedures with respect to, a listed company if the market price of its shares falls below $0.06 per share at any time during the trading day. For much of the several months prior to the 1-for-25 reverse stock split of our common stock which became effective as of October 7, 2016, our common stock had traded at prices less than $1.00. Since we effected the reverse stock split, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE MKT has been above $1.00, but there is no assurance that our stock will not trade at levels viewed as abnormally low for a substantial period of time and lead the NYSE MKT to immediately suspend trading in our common stock. Dilution caused by the issuance of the securities offered in this offering or the offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of our common stock or securities convertible into our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to trade at prices less than $1.00.

 22

Because the effective common stock purchase price in this offering is less than the current Series B Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price of $8.25, we will be required to issue additional shares of common stock to the holders of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, which will be dilutive to all of our other stockholders, including new investors in this offering.

The certificate of designation for our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock contains anti-dilution provisions, pursuant to which, in the event that, while any of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is outstanding, we issue equity or equity-linked securities at an effective common stock purchase price of less than the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price then in effect, we are required, subject to certain limitations and adjustments as provided in the certificate of designation, to reduce the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price to equal the effective common stock purchase price. This reduction in the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price will result in a greater number of shares of common stock being issuable upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock or the payment of any dividends’ thereunder in shares of common stock for no additional consideration. In accordance with this anti-dilution price protection, because the effective common stock purchase price in this offering is below the current Series B Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price of $8.25 per share of common stock, it will result in the issuance of additional shares of common stock to the holders of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock or the payment of any dividends’ thereunder in shares of common stock, which will be dilutive to all of our other stockholders, including new investors in this offering. Based on an assumed offering price of $10.00 per unit and an assumed Preferred Stock conversion price of $2.50 per share of common stock, we would be required to issue 5,015,488 additional shares of common stock to the holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock.

Because there is no minimum required for the offering to close, investors in this offering will not receive a refund in the event that we do not sell an amount of securities sufficient to pursue the business goals outlined in this prospectus.

We have not specified a minimum offering amount nor have or will we establish an escrow account in connection with this offering. Because there is no escrow account and no minimum offering amount, investors could be in a position where they have invested in our company, but we are unable to fulfill our objectives due to a lack of interest in this offering. Further, because there is no escrow account in operation and no minimum investment amount, any proceeds from the sale of securities offered by us will be available for our immediate use, despite uncertainty about whether we would be able to use such funds to effectively implement our business plan. Investor funds will not be returned under any circumstances whether during or after the offering.

Our management team may invest or spend the proceeds of this offering in ways with which you may not agree or in ways which may not yield a significant return.

Our management will have broad discretion over the use of proceeds from this offering. We intend to use the net proceeds of this offering to further fund the expansion of our sales and marketing activities for CGuard EPS and MGuard Prime EPS. If we receive sufficient proceeds from the exercise of the Series C Warrants, we plan to continue the development of and manufacturing enhancements for CGuard EPS and further our efforts to obtain an IDE approval for CGuard EPS and for general corporate purposes. However, our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds from this offering and could spend the proceeds in ways that do not improve our results of operations or enhance the value of our common stock. The failure by management to apply these funds effectively could result in financial losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, cause the price of our common stock to decline and delay the development of our product candidates.

Purchasers in this offering may experience additional dilution in the book value of their investment in the future.

We are not restricted from issuing additional securities in the future, including shares of common stock, securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common stock or substantially similar securities. The issuance of these securities may cause further dilution to our stockholders. In order to raise additional capital, we may in the future offer such additional securities at prices that may not be the same as the price per share in this offering. We cannot assure you that we will be able to sell shares or other securities in any other offering at a price per share that is equal to or greater than the price per share paid by investors in this offering, and investors purchasing shares or other securities in the future could have rights superior to existing stockholders, including investors who purchase securities in this offering. The price per share at which we sell additional shares of our common stock or securities convertible into common stock in future transactions may be higher or lower than the price per share in this offering. The exercise of outstanding stock options and the vesting of outstanding restricted stock units may also result in further dilution of your investment.

Because our offering will be conducted on a best efforts basis, there can be no assurance that we can raise the money we need.

The placement agent is offering the securities on a “best efforts” basis with no minimum, and the placement agent is under no obligation to purchase any securities for their own account. The placement agent is not required to sell any specific number or dollar amount of securities in this offering but will use its best efforts to sell the securities offered in this prospectus. As a “best efforts” offering, there can be no assurance that the offering contemplated hereby will ultimately be consummated. If the offering is not consummated or we receive less than the maximum proceeds, our business plans and prospects for the current fiscal year could be adversely affected.

There is no public market for the Preferred Stock or the Warrants included in the units being offered in this offering.

The Preferred Stock and the Warrants are new issues of securities with no established trading market. None of the Preferred Stock or the Warrants will be listed on any securities exchange and we do not expect the Preferred Stock or the Warrants to be quoted on any quotation system. There is no established trading market for the Preferred Stock or the Warrants. In addition, because our publicly-traded Series A Warrants recently commenced trading on the NYSE MKT, there is a limited trading history from which you can make an investment decision to purchase the Warrants. A trading market for neither the Preferred Stock nor the Warrants is expected to develop, and even if a market develops for the Preferred Stock or the Warrants, it may not provide meaningful liquidity. The absence of a trading market or liquidity for the Preferred Stock or the Warrants may adversely affect their value.

The certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the Preferred Stock contains anti-dilution provisions that may result in the reduction of the conversion price in the future. This feature may result in an indeterminate number of shares of common stock being issued upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock or the Preferred Stock. Sales of these shares will dilute the interests of other security holders and may depress the price of our common stock.

The respective certificate of designation for our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Preferred Stock contains anti-dilution provisions, which provisions require the lowering of the applicable conversion price, as then in effect, to the purchase price of equity or equity-linked securities issued in subsequent offerings. If in the future, while any of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock or Preferred Stock is outstanding, we issue securities at an effective common stock purchase price of less than the applicable conversion price of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock or Preferred Stock, as then in effect, we will be required, subject to certain limitations and adjustments as provided in the respective certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the Preferred Stock, to further reduce the relevant conversion price, which will result in a greater number of shares of common stock being issuable upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock or the Preferred Stock , which in turn will have a greater dilutive effect on our shareholders. In addition, as there is no floor price on the conversion price, we cannot determine the total number of shares issuable upon conversion. As such, it is possible that we will not have a sufficient number of available shares to satisfy the conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock or the Preferred Stock if we enter into a future transaction that reduces the applicable conversion price. If we do not have a sufficient number of available shares for any Series B Convertible Preferred Stock or Preferred Stock conversions, we will be required to increase our authorized shares, which may not be possible and will be time consuming and expensive. The potential for such additional issuances may depress the price of our common stock regardless of our business performance. We may find it more difficult to raise additional equity capital while any of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock or Preferred Stock is outstanding.

The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock provides for the payment of dividends in cash or in shares of our common stock, and we may not be permitted to pay such dividends in cash, which will require us to have shares of common stock available to pay the dividends.

Each share of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to receive cumulative dividends at the rate per share of 15% per annum of the stated value per share, until the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. The dividends are payable, at our discretion, in cash, out of any funds legally available for such purpose, or in pay-in-kind shares of common stock calculated based on the conversion price, subject to adjustment as provided in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. The conversion price is subject to reduction if in the future we issue securities for less than the conversion price of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, as then in effect. As there is no floor price on the conversion price, we cannot determine the total number of shares issuable upon conversion or in connection with the dividend. As such, it is possible that we will not have a sufficient number of available shares to pay the dividend in common stock, which would require the payment of the dividend in cash. We will not be permitted to pay the dividend in cash unless we are legally permitted to do so under Delaware law, which requires cash to be available from surplus or net profits, which may not be available at the time payment is due. Additionally, we are also subject to certain restrictions pursuant to our loan and security agreement with Hercules, which prohibits us from paying cash dividends or distributions on our capital stock. As such, we do not expect to have cash available to pay the dividends on our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock or to be permitted to make such payments under our loan agreements, and will be relying on having available shares of common stock to pay such dividends, which will result in dilution to our shareholders. If we do not have such available shares, we may not be able to satisfy our dividend obligations.

We are subject to financial reporting and other requirements that place significant demands on our resources.

We are subject to reporting and other obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 requires us to conduct an annual management assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. These reporting and other obligations place significant demands on our management, administrative, operational, internal audit and accounting resources. Any failure to maintain effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and stock price. Moreover, effective internal control is necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and prevent fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, we may not be able to manage our business as effectively as we would if an effective control environment existed, and our business and reputation with investors may be harmed.

There are inherent limitations in all control systems, and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

The ongoing internal control provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require us to identify material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, which is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our internal controls and disclosure controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefit of controls must be relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, in our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Further, controls can be circumvented by individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more persons, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may be inadequate because of changes in conditions, such as growth of the company or increased transaction volume, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

In addition, discovery and disclosure of a material weakness, by definition, could have a material adverse impact on our financial statements. Such an occurrence could discourage certain customers or suppliers from doing business with us and adversely affect how our stock trades. This could in turn negatively affect our ability to access equity markets for capital.

Delaware law and our corporate charter and bylaws contain anti-takeover provisions that could delay or discourage takeover attempts that stockholders may consider favorable.

Our board of directors is authorized to issue shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the voting powers, preferences and other rights and limitations of the preferred stock. Accordingly, we may issue shares of preferred stock with a preference over our common stock with respect to dividends or distributions on liquidation or dissolution, or that may otherwise adversely affect the voting or other rights of the holders of common stock. Issuances of preferred stock, depending upon the rights, preferences and designations of the preferred stock, may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change of control, even if that change of control might benefit our stockholders. In addition, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Section 203 generally prohibits a public Delaware corporation from engaging in a “business combination” with an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless (i) prior to the date of the transaction, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder; (ii) the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the number of shares outstanding (a) shares owned by persons who are directors and also officers and (b) shares owned by employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or (iii) on or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the business combination is approved by the board and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the interested stockholder.

Section 203 could delay or prohibit mergers or other takeover or change in control attempts with respect to us and, accordingly, may discourage attempts to acquire us even though such a transaction may offer our stockholders the opportunity to sell their stock at a price above the prevailing market price.

Offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our publicly traded securities to decline.

Sales of a significant number of shares of our common stock or our warrants in the public market could harm the market prices of our common stock or warrants and make it more difficult for us to raise funds through future offerings of common stock or warrants. Our stockholders and the holders of our options and warrants may sell substantial amounts of our common stock or our publicly traded warrants in the public market. In addition, we will be required to issue additional shares of common stock to the holders of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon conversion of shares of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock because the effective common stock purchase price in this offering is less than the current Series B Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price of $8.25, which in turn will increase the number of shares of common stock available for sale. See “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Organization and Our Common Stock, Preferred Stock, Warrants and this Offering—Because the effective common stock purchase price in this offering is less than the current Series B Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price of $8.25, we will be required to issue additional shares of common stock to the holders of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, which will be dilutive to all of our other stockholders, including new investors in this offering”.

In addition, the fact that our stockholders, option holders and warrant holders can sell substantial amounts of our common stock or our publicly traded warrants in the public market, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, could make it more difficult for us to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate, or at all.

Noindustry analyst publishes research about our business.

The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us or our business. Because no industry analyst publishes research about us , we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

Aspects of the tax treatment of the securities may be uncertain.

The tax treatment of our preferred stock and our warrants is uncertain and may vary depending upon whether you are an individual or a legal entity and whether or not you are domiciled in the United States. In the event you are a non-U.S. investor, you should consult your tax advisors as to the consequences, under the tax laws of the country where you are resident for tax purposes, of acquiring, holding and disposing of our preferred stock and our warrants .

Risks Related to our Indebtedness

Our obligations under our outstanding term loan are secured by all of our assets, so if we default on those obligations, the lender could foreclose on our assets. As a result of these security interests, such assets would only be available to satisfy claims of our general creditors or to holders of our equity securities if we were to become insolvent at a time when the value of such assets exceeded the amount of our indebtedness and other obligations. In addition, the existence of these security interests may adversely affect our financial flexibility.

Hercules, the lender under our term loan has a security interest in all of our assets and those of InspireMD Ltd., our wholly-owned subsidiary. As a result, if we default under our obligations to the lender, the lender could foreclose on its security interests and liquidate some or all of these assets, which would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. The current principal amount of the term loan as of February 1 , 2017, was approximately $1.5 million.

In the event of a default in connection with our bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation, or reorganization, the lender would have a prior right to substantially all of our assets to the exclusion of our general creditors. In that event, our assets would first be used to repay in full all indebtedness and other obligations secured by the lender, resulting in all or a portion of our assets being unavailable to satisfy the claims of any unsecured indebtedness. Only after satisfying the claims of any unsecured creditors would any amount be available for our equity holders.

The pledge of these assets and other restrictions may limit our flexibility in raising capital for other purposes. Because substantially all of our assets are pledged under the term loan, our ability to incur additional secured indebtedness or to sell or dispose of assets to raise capital may be impaired, which could have an adverse effect on our financial flexibility.

Our loan and security agreement contains customary events of default. In addition, an event of default will include the occurrence of a circumstance that would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect upon (i) our business, operations, properties, assets, prospects or condition (financial or otherwise), (ii) our ability to perform our obligations under the agreement and any related loan documents or (iii) the collateral, the lender’s liens on the collateral or the priority of such liens.

Our outstanding term loan obligations may adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to operate our business.

Pursuant to the terms of our loan and security agreement, the lender made a term loan to us and InspireMD Ltd. in aggregate amount of $10 million. We are required to make monthly payments of interest and principal in the amount of approximately $380,000 per month. The current principal amount of the loan as of February 1 , 2017 was approximately $1.5 million. The term loan under the loan and security agreement, as amended, matures on June 1, 2017.

The terms of our term loan could have negative consequences to us, such as:

we may be unable to obtain additional financing to fund working capital, operating losses, capital expenditures or acquisitions on terms acceptable to us, or at all;

the amount of our interest expense may increase because our term loan has a variable rate of interest at any time that the prime rate, as reported in the Wall Street Journal, is above 5.5%; and

we may be more vulnerable to economic downturns and adverse developments in our industry or the economy in general.

Our ability to meet our expenses and debt obligations will depend on our future performance, which will be affected by financial, business, economic, regulatory and other factors. We will be unable to control many of these factors, such as economic conditions. We cannot be certain that we will continue to have sufficient capital to allow us to pay the principal and interest on our debt and meet any other obligations. If we do not have enough money to service our debt, we may be required, but unable to refinance all or part of our existing debt, sell assets, borrow money or raise equity on terms acceptable to us, if at all, and the lender could foreclose on its security interests and liquidate some or all of our assets.

Our loan and security agreement contains covenants that could limit our financing options and liquidity position, which would limit our ability to grow our business.

Covenants in our loan and security agreement impose operating and financial restrictions on us. These restrictions prohibit or limit our ability, and the ability of InspireMD Ltd., to, among other things:

pay cash dividends to our stockholders;
redeem or repurchase our common stock or other equity;
incur additional indebtedness;
permit liens on assets;
make certain investments (including through the acquisition of stock, shares, partnership or limited liability company interests, any loan, advance or capital contribution);
sell, lease, license, lend or otherwise convey an interest in a material portion of our assets; and
cease making public filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

These restrictions may limit our ability to obtain additional financing, withstand downturns in our business or take advantage of business opportunities. Moreover, additional debt financing we may seek, if permitted, may contain terms that include more restrictive covenants, may require repayment on an accelerated schedule or may impose other obligations that limit our ability to grow our business, acquire needed assets, or take other actions we might otherwise consider appropriate or desirable.

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This prospectus and the information incorporated by reference herein and therein contain “forward-looking statements,” which include information relating to future events, future financial performance, strategies, expectations, competitive environment and regulation. Words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” and similar expressions, as well as statements in future tense, identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results and will probably not be accurate indications of when such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on information we have when those statements are made or our management’s good faith belief as of that time with respect to future events, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to:

 

 our history of recurring losses and negative cash flows from operating activities, significant future commitments and the uncertainty regarding the adequacy of our liquidity to pursue our complete business objectives, and substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern;
 

our need to raise additional capital to meet our business requirements in the future and such capital raising may be costly or difficult to obtain and could dilute ourout stockholders’ ownership interests;

 the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on our manufacturing, sales, business plan and the global economy;
negative clinical trial results or lengthy product delays in key markets;
our ability to maintain compliance with the NYSE American listing standards;
 our ability to generate revenues from our products and obtain and maintain regulatory approvals for our products;
 
our ability to adequately protect our intellectual property;
 our dependence on a single manufacturing facility and our ability to comply with stringent manufacturing quality standards and to increase production as necessary;
 the risk that the data collected from our current and planned clinical trials may not be sufficient to demonstrate that our technology is an attractive alternative to other procedures and products;
 market acceptance of our products;
 

market acceptancean inability to secure and adoptionmaintain regulatory approvals for the sale of our products;

 intense competition in our industry, with competitors having substantially greater financial, technological, research and development, regulatory and clinical, manufacturing, marketing and sales, distribution and personnel resources than we do;
 
entry of new competitors and products and potential technological obsolescence of our products;
 inability to carry out research, development and commercialization plans;
 loss of a key customer or supplier;
 technical problems with our research and products and potential product liability claims;
 product malfunctions;
 price increases for supplies and components;
 adverse economic conditions;
 insufficient or inadequate reimbursement by governmental and other third partythird-party payers for our products;
 our efforts to successfully obtain and maintain intellectual property protection covering our products, which may not be successful;
 adverse federal, state and local government regulation, in the United States, Europe or Israel and other foreign jurisdictions;
 the fact that we conduct business in multiple foreign jurisdictions, exposing us to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, logistical and communications challenges, burdens and costs of compliance with foreign laws and political and economic instability in each jurisdiction;
 price increases for suppliesthe escalation of hostilities in Israel, which could impair our ability to manufacture our products; and components;
inability to carry out research, development and commercialization plans; and
 loss or retirement of key executives and research scientists.

 

The foregoing does not represent an exhaustive list of matters that may be covered by the forward-looking statements contained herein or risk factors that we are faced with that may cause our actual results to differ from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements. You should review carefully the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 89 of this prospectus for a discussion of these and other risks that relate to our business and investing in our securities. The forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which any such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

USE OF PROCEEDS

 

We estimate that thewe will receive net proceeds from this offering of approximately $13.6 million from the sale of our securities in this offering, based upon an assumed public offering price of $0.7623 per unit (the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NYSE American on January 26, 2021), assuming the sale of all 19,677,292 units and no sale of any pre-funded units offered underin this prospectus,offering and after deducting estimated placement agent feesunderwriting discounts and othercommissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us will be $6,642,500 if we sellas described in “Underwriting.” If the maximum amount of units offered hereby. However, this is a best efforts offering with no minimum, and we may not sell all or any of the securities; as a result, we may receive significantly less in net proceeds, and the net proceeds received may not be sufficientunderwriter’s option to continue to operate our business. If any of the Warrants included in units soldpurchase additional shares in this offering is exercised ,in full, we may also receiveestimate that our net proceeds from this offering will be approximately $15.7 million, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. These estimates exclude the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the Warrants.Series G Warrants sold in this offering. If all of the Series BG Warrants sold in this offering were to be exercised in cash at an assumed exercise price of $3.13$0.84 per share, we would receive additional net proceeds of approximately $9,375,000 . If all of the Series C Warrants were to be exercised in cash at an assumed exercise price of $2.50 per share, we would receive additional net proceeds of approximately $7,125,000 .$9.5 million. We cannot predict when or if thethese Series G Warrants will be exercised. It is possible that thethese Series G Warrants may expire and may never be exercised.

On July 7, 2016, we closed a public offering of shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Series A Warrants, pursuant to which we received net proceeds of approximately $13.1 million. The net proceeds from this offering provided us with the capital to operate our business since the time of that offering, to revise our sales force strategy and to further the clinical development of our products. In particular,

 

we hired a new chief commercial officer in October 2016 to analyze and revise, as necessary, our sales strategy for our products;
we expanded our sales and marketing forces, which were reduced in 2015 pursuant to cost cutting initiatives; and
we began participating in industry conferences and other promotional activities.

We also used a portion of the proceeds from the July 2016 offering to further develop the clinical protocol synopsis for CGuard EPS in order to ultimately seek the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for commercial sales in the United States.

While the proceeds from the July 2016 offering enabled us to make important investments in the future growth of the company, the proceeds were not sufficient for us fully accomplish our goals. In addition, based upon our anticipated expenses, we currently expect to run out funds within six months from the date of this prospectus.

As such, we intend to use the net proceeds from the sale of the units offered in this offering, together with other available funds, to further fundsupport our operations, including for our pivotal clinical trial for our CGuard™ Carotid Stent System, CARENET-III, including the expansioncosts of producing and manufacturing the product required for the clinical trial and enhancements to our manufacturing and quality systems for purposes of compliance with FDA Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), for working capital and for other general corporate purposes, which will include the pursuit of our salesother research and marketing activities for CGuard EPS and MGuard Prime EPS, including the recruitment of more distributor and sales representatives.

If we receive sufficient proceeds from the exercise of the Series C Warrants, together with any balance from the net proceeds from the sale of the units, we intend to use the net proceeds from the exercise of the Series C Warrants for the following activities:

to continue the development of and manufacturing enhancements for CGuard EPS, including developing CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter (5 French gauge), which, we believe, will enable us to meet the market demand for minimally invasive devices, have a competitive advantage in penetrating the Asia Pacific market and offer our product for transradial catheterization, which, we believe, is gaining favor among interventionalists; and
to further our efforts to obtain an IDE approval for CGuard EPS, to ultimately seek the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for commercial sales in the United States. 

development efforts.

 

We expect toThe expected use any balance of the foregoingnet proceeds of this offering represents our current intentions based upon our present plan and any additional proceeds from exercise of the Warrants, if any, for operations and general working capital requirements.

business conditions. Investors are cautioned, however, that expenditures may vary substantially from these uses. Investors will be relying on the judgment of our management, who will have broad discretion regarding the application of the proceeds of this offering. The amounts and timing of our actual expenditures will depend upon numerous factors, including the amount of cash generated by our operations, the amount of competition we face and other operational factors. We may find it necessary or advisable to use portions of the proceeds from this offering for other purposes.

 

From time to time, we evaluate these and other factors and we anticipate continuing to make such evaluations to determine if the existing allocation of resources, including the proceeds of this offering, is being optimized. Circumstances that may give rise to a change in the use of proceeds include:

 

 a change in development plan or strategy;
   
 the addition of new products or applications;
   
 technical delays;
 delays or difficulties with our clinical trials;
   
 negative results from our clinical trials;
   
 difficulty obtaining regulatory approval;
   
 failure to achieve sales as anticipated; and
   
 the availability of other sources of cash including cash flow from operations and new bank debt financing arrangements, if any.

 

Until we use the net proceeds of this offering, we willintend to hold such funds in cash or invest the funds in short-term, investment grade, interest-bearing securities.

 

A $1.00$0.10 increase or decrease in the anticipatedassumed public offering price of $10.00 per$0.7623per unit, based on the last reported sale price for our common stock as reported on the NYSE American on January 26, 2021, would increase or decrease the net proceeds to us from this offering by approximately $690,000 , assuming we sell the maximum amount of units offered hereby$1,820,000, and after deducting estimated placement agent feesunderwriting discounts and othercommissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. us, and excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the Series G Warrants issued in this offering.

Similarly, anyan increase or decrease inof 100,000 units offered by us, as set forth on the numbercover page of units that we sell in the offering willthis prospectus, would increase or decrease ourthe net proceeds in proportion to such increase or decrease, as applicable, multipliedus by approximately $70,000, assuming the assumed public offering price of $0.7623 per unit , lessremains the same, and after deducting estimated placement agent feesunderwriting discounts and othercommissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. The information discussed above is illustrative onlyus, and will adjust based onexcluding the actual public offering price,proceeds, if any, from the numberexercise of securities sold and other terms ofthe Series G Warrants issued in this offering determined at pricing.

PRICE RANGE OF OUR COMMON STOCK

Our common stock has been quoted on the NYSE MKT since April 11, 2013 under the symbol “NSPR”

The following table sets forth the intra-day high and low sales price per share for our common stock, as reported on the NYSE MKT, for the periods indicated. The sales prices for our common stock are adjusted for the 1-for-10 reverse stock split of our common stock that occurred on October 1, 2015 and the 1-for-25 reverse stock split of our common stock that occurred on October 7, 2016:

  Common Stock 
  High  Low 
Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2017        
First quarter (through February 15 , 2017) $3.97  $2.01 
Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2016        
Fourth quarter $4.39  $1.41 
Third quarter $7.50  $1.75 
Second quarter $15.50  $7.75 
First quarter $23.75  $9.75 
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2015        
Fourth quarter $53.00  $15.75 
Third quarter $80.00  $37.50 
Second quarter $105.00  $47.50 
First quarter $252.50  $57.50 

The closing price of our common stock on the NYSE MKT on February 15 , 2017 was $2.35 per share. Immediately prior to this offering, we had 1,472,606 issued and outstanding shares of common stock, which were held by approximately 237 holders of record.offering.

 

DIVIDEND POLICY

 

In the past, we have not declared or paid cash dividends on our capitalcommon stock. Our loan and security agreement with Hercules, dated October 23, 2013, as amended, prohibits us from paying cash dividends or distributions on our capital stock. Even if we are permittedWe do not intend to pay cash dividends in the future, we do not intend to do so. Rather,rather, we intend to retain future earnings, if any, to fund the operation and expansion of our business and for general corporate purposes.

The holders of Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cumulative dividends at the rate per share of 15% per annum of the stated value per share, until the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock. The dividends become payable, at our option, in either cash, out of any funds legally available for such purpose, or in shares of common stock, (i) upon any conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock, (ii) on each such other date as our board of directors may determine, subject to written consent of the holders of Series B Preferred Stock holding a majority of the then issued and outstanding Series B Preferred Stock, (iii) upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, and (iv) upon occurrence of a fundamental transaction, including any merger or consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, exchange or conversion of all of our common stock by tender offer, exchange offer or reclassification; provided, however, that if Series B Preferred Stock is converted into shares of common stock at any time prior to the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock, the holder will receive a make-whole payment in an amount equal to all of the dividends that, but for the early conversion, would have otherwise accrued on the applicable shares of Series B Preferred Stock being converted for the period commencing on the conversion date and ending on the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance, less the amount of all prior dividends paid on such converted Series B Preferred Stock before the date of conversion. Make-whole payments are payable at our option in either cash, out of any funds legally available for such purpose, or in shares of common stock. With respect to any dividend payments and make-whole payments paid in shares of common stock, the number of shares of common stock to be issued to a holder of Series B Preferred Stock will be an amount equal to the quotient of (i) the amount of the dividend payable to such holder divided by (ii) the conversion price then in effect.

The holders of Series C Preferred Stock are not entitled to receive any dividends, unless and until specifically declared by our board of directors. However, holders of our Series C Preferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends on shares of Series C Preferred Stock equal (on an as-if-converted-to-common-stock basis, and without giving effect for such purposes to the 4.99% or 9.99% beneficial ownership limitation, as applicable) to and in the same form as dividends actually paid on shares of the common stock when such dividends are specifically declared by our board of directors. We are not obligated to redeem or repurchase any shares of Series C Preferred Stock. Shares of Series C Preferred Stock are not otherwise entitled to any redemption rights, or mandatory sinking fund or analogous fund provision.

CAPITALIZATION

 

The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents, certain other items from our historical consolidated balance sheet, and capitalization as of December 31 , 2016:September 30, 2020:

 

 on an actual basis;
on a pro forma basis, giving effect to (i) the sale of 24,602,190 shares of our common stock pursuant to the Sales Agreement following September 30, 2020, including the sale of 1,882,514 shares of our common stock pursuant to the increase to the ATM Facility from $9,300,000 to $10,382,954 on January 11, 2021, (ii) the private placement investment of $100,000 by Dr. Gary Roubin in exchange for 222,223 units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase our common stock with an exercise price of $0.495, (iii) the reduction of the conversion price of Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock to $0.321 per share, effective as of December 14, 2020, pursuant to the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the respective certificates of designation, triggered by the ATM Facility and (iv) the exercise of warrants to purchase 9,849,900 shares of common stock, as of January 26, 2021; and
   
 

on ana pro forma as adjusted basis, giving effect to our receipt of the net proceeds from the sale by us of 19,677,292 shares of common stock included in the units in this offering of 750,000 units at an anticipatedassumed public offering price of $10.00$0.7623 per unit, which is the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NYSE American on January 26, 2021, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses, and assuming the conversionno sale of allany pre-funded warrants in this offering and no exercise of the Preferred Stock included in the units intoSeries G Warrants to purchase up to 9,838,646 shares of common stock issuable in this offering, and after deducting estimated placement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses payable by us.

excluding the proceeds, if any, from any such exercise.

 

For the purposes of this capitalization discussion, we determined the assumed number of shares by dividing (x) $7,500,000 that we anticipate raising in this offering by (y) an assumed offering price of $10.00 per unit . The actual number of units sold in this offering will be determined by dividing (x) the actual amount of money raised in this offering by (y) the public offering price per unit as mutually determined by the placement agent and us. In addition, for the purposes of this Capitalization discussion, we took into account the additional shares of common stock that we will be required to issue to the holders of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon conversion of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock based on 311,521 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of December 31 , 2016, an assumed offering price of $10.00 per unit and an assumed Preferred Stock conversion price of $2.50 per share of common stock (see “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Organization and Our Common Stock, Preferred Stock, Warrants and this Offering—Because the effective common stock purchase price in this offering is less than the current Series B Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price of $8.25, we will be required to issue additional shares of common stock to the holders of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, which will be dilutive to all of our other stockholders, including new investors in this offering”). The as adjustedpro forma as-adjusted information below is illustrative only and our capitalization following the completion of this offering will be adjusted based on the actual public offering price, the number of securities soldis subject to various adjustments. See “Underwriting – Discount, Commissions and other terms ofExpenses” below in this offering determined at pricing.prospectus. You should read this table together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and the related notes appearingincluded elsewhere in this prospectus.

 December 31, 2016
(in thousands) (unaudited)
  September 30, 2020
(in thousands) (unaudited)
 
 Actual As Adjusted  Actual Pro Forma Pro Forma As Adjusted 
Cash and cash equivalents $7,516  $

14,158

  $10,882 $25,620 $39,226 
Equity:               
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share – 150,000,000 shares authorized; 1,475,318 shares and 9,490,806 shares issued and outstanding actual and as adjusted(1), respectively    $1 
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share; 5,000,000 shares authorized:        
Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share; none issued and outstanding actual and as adjusted      
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share; 311,521 shares issued and outstanding actual and as adjusted      
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share; none issued and outstanding at December 31 , 2016; 750,000 shares issued as adjusted      
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share – 150,000,000 shares authorized; 36,059,128 shares issued and outstanding actual, 71,639,204 shares outstanding pro forma and 91,316,496 shares outstanding pro forma as adjusted $3 $6 $8 
Preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share - 5,000,000 shares authorized:       
Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share; none issued and outstanding actual, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted -     
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share; 17,303 shares issued and outstanding actual, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted -     
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share; 2,343 shares issued and outstanding actual, pro forma and pro forma as adjusted -     
Additional paid-in capital  135,959   142,600  175,600 190,335 203,941 
Accumulated deficit  ( 131,914)  (131,914) (164,323) (164,323) (164,323)
Total equity  4,045   10,687  $11,280 $26,018 $39,626 

 

A $0.10 increase or decrease in the assumed combined public offering price of $0.7623 per unit, which is the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NYSE American on January 26, 2021, would increase or decrease, as appropriate, our pro forma as adjusted cash and cash equivalents, additional paid-in capital, total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization by approximately $1,820,000, assuming the number of units offered by us as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus remains the same, and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses payable by us, and excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the Series G Warrants issued in this offering.

Similarly, an increase or decrease of 100,000 in the number of units offered by us, based on the assumed public offering price of $0.7623 per unit, would increase or decrease our pro forma as adjusted cash and cash equivalents, total assets and total stockholders’ equity by approximately $70,000, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses payable by us, and excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the Series G Warrants issued in this offering.

The above discussion and table are based on 36,059,128 shares outstanding as of September 30, 2020, and excludes as of that date:

(1)9,490,806shares issued and outstanding as adjusted includes 3,000,000 shares of common stock underlying Preferred Stock included in the units being sold in this offering  and 5,015,488 shares of common stock that we will be required to issue to the holders of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon conversion of shares of the Series B Convertible Preferred and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, based on 311,521 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of December 31 , 2016, an assumed offering price of $10.00 per unit and an assumed Preferred Stock conversion price of $2.50 per share of common stock , and does not include 6,000,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the full exercise of the Warrants being sold in this offering, and 150,00026,705,502 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the placement agent’s warrant.outstanding warrants, with an exercise price ranging from $0.495 to $32,266 per share and having a weighted average exercise price of $1.82 per share;

DILUTION

The discussion assumes an offering price of $10.00 per unit and an assumed Preferred Stock conversion price of $2.50 per share of common stock.

If you invest in our securities in this offering , your interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the price per unit you pay in this offering and the as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after this offering (assuming the conversion of all of the Preferred Stock included in the unit into shares of common stock). For the purpose of such calculation, the entire purchase price for the unit is being allocated to the Preferred Stock included in the unit , and the shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants included in the unit have not been included.

Our net tangible book value of our common stock as of December 31 , 2016, was approximately $4,007,000 or approximately $2.72 per share of common stock based on 1,475,318 shares outstanding (including 1,344,869 vested restricted shares and 130,449 unvested restricted shares) at that time. “Net tangible book value” is total assets minus the sum of liabilities and intangible assets. “Net tangible book value per share” is net tangible book value divided by the total number of shares outstanding.

After giving effect to (i) the sale of 750,000 units at an assumed offering price of $10.00 per unit and assuming the conversion of all shares of Preferred Stock included in the units into 3,000,000 shares of common stock at an assumed conversion price of $2.50 per share of common stock and no exercise of any of the Warrants offered hereby, and after deducting estimated placement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses payable by us, and (ii) the issuance of 5,015,488 shares of common stock that we will be required to issue to the holders of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon conversion of shares of Series B Convertible Preferred and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, based on 311,521 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of December 31 , 2016, our net tangible book value as of December 31 , 2016, would have been approximately $10,649,000 , or approximately $1.12 per share of common stock based on 9,490,806 shares of common stock outstanding on a pro forma basis at that time. This represents an immediate decrease in net tangible book value of $1.60 per share to our existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of approximately $1.38 per share to new investors participating in this offering (assuming conversion of all of the Preferred Stock included in the units covered by this prospectus into shares of common stock), as illustrated by the following table:

Preferred Stock conversionprice per share of common stock $2.50 
     
Net tangible book value per share of common stock as ofDecember 31, 2016 $2.72 
     
Decrease in net tangible book value per share of common stock attributable to the offering $(1.60)
     
Pro forma net tangible book value per share of common stock as of December 31 , 2016 after giving effect to the offering $1.12 
     
Dilution in net tangible book value per share of common stock to new investors in the offering $1.38 

The discussion of dilution, and the table quantifying it, attribute no value to the Warrants being issued in this offering and assume no exercise of any of the Warrants included in the units offered hereby or any outstanding options or warrants or other potentially dilutive securities. The exercise of potentially dilutive securities having an exercise price less than the offering price would increase the dilutive effect to new investors.

In particular, the table above excludes the following potentially dilutive securities as of December 31 , 2016:

 
3,6602,220,552 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants with an exercise price of $1,800.00 per share;
2,640 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants with an exercise price of $750.00 per share;
674 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants with an exercise price of $742.50 per share;
12,531 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants to purchase one-half of one share of common stock with an exercise price for two warrants of $437.50 per full share;
137,484 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants with an exercise price of $137.50 per share;
58,668 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants with an exercise price of $14.75 per share;
5,867 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants with an exercise price of $18.44 per share;
38,691 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding warrants issued to Hercules on June 13, 2016, with an exercise price of $4.71 per share;
1,246,084shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of the currently outstanding Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and(including the payment of allthe cumulative dividends accrued on the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock in an aggregate of 934,563951,665 shares of common stock upon conversion of outstanding Series B Convertible Preferred Stockstock), at the conversion price of $8.25$0.45 per share and the stated value per share of $33.00;
  
33,322 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the outstanding Series C Preferred Stock at the conversion price of $0.45 per share and the stated value per share of $6.40;
 

1,769,6961,155,522 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding Series A Warrantsoptions with anexercise prices ranging from $0.001 to $3,675,000 and having a weighted average exercise price of $5.00$48 per share;

  
123,880 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and exercise of the Series A Warrants included in the unit purchase option that we issued to the placement agent in the public offering that closed on July 7, 2016;
46,455 shares of common stock issuable as cumulative dividends upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock included in the unit purchase option that we issued to the placement agent in the public offering that closed on July 7, 2016;
249,309shares of common stock that we will be required to issue to the placement agent upon conversion of shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, based on an assumed offering price of $10.00 per unit and an assumed Preferred Stock conversion price of $2.50 per share of common stock, included in the unit purchase option that we issued to the placement agent in the public offering that closed on July 7, 2016 (see “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Organization and Our Common Stock, Preferred Stock, Warrants and this Offering—Because the effective common stock purchase price in this offering is less than the current Series B Convertible Preferred Stock conversion price of $8.25, we will be required to issue additional shares of common stock to the holders of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock as a result of the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, which will be dilutive to all of our other stockholders, including new investors in this offering”);

150,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants that we have agreed to issue to the placement agent or its designees in this offering, assuming the sale of all units covered by this prospectus, at a price per share equal to 125% of the of the conversion price of the Preferred Stock;

337,421182,381 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of currently outstanding options with exercise prices ranging from $0.0001 to $2,100.00 and having a weighted average exercise price of $27.64 per share;

Restricted Stock Units outside our 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan;
  

1,6941,175,287 shares of common stock available for future issuanceissuable upon the exercise of Restricted Stock Units under our 2011 UMBRELLA Option2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and

  

233,1892,606,576 shares of common stock available for future issuance under our 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

Plan

 

39

DILUTION

Our net tangible book value as of September 30, 2020, was approximately $11.4 million, or $0.31 per share. Net tangible book value per share is determined by dividing our total tangible assets, less total liabilities, by the number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2020. Dilution with respect to net tangible book value per share represents the difference between the amount per share paid by purchasers of shares of common stock in this offering and the net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after this offering.

Our pro forma net tangible book value as of September 30, 2020, was approximately $26.1 million, or $0.36 per share, after giving effect to (i) the sale of 24,602,190 shares of our common stock pursuant to the Sales Agreement following September 30, 2020, including the sale of 1,882,514 shares of our common stock pursuant to the increase to the ATM Facility from $9,300,000 to $10,382,954 on January 11, 2021, (ii) the private placement investment of $100,000 by Dr. Gary Roubin in exchange for 222,223 units consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase our common stock with an exercise price of $0.495, and (iii) the reduction of the conversion price of Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock to $0.321 per share, effective as of December 14, 2020, pursuant to the full ratchet anti-dilution price protection in the respective certificates of designation, triggered by the ATM Facility and (iv) the exercise of warrants to purchase 9,849,900 shares of common stock, as of January 26, 2021; and

Our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value as of September 30, 2020, would have been approximately $39.6 million, or $0.43 per share, based on 91,316,496 shares of common stock outstanding on an pro forma as adjusted basis at that time, after giving effect to the sale by us of 19,677,292 shares of common stock in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $0.7623 per share, which is the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NYSE American on January 26, 2021, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses, and assuming no sale of any pre-funded warrants in this offering, and excluding the proceeds, if any, from any such exercise.

After giving effect to the sale by us of 19,677,292 shares of common stock included in the units sold in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $0.7623 per unit, which is the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NYSE American on January 26, 2021, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value as of September 30, 2020, would have been approximately $39.6 million, or $0.43 per share, based on 91,316,496 shares of common stock outstanding on an pro forma as adjusted basis at that time.

The following table illustrates this dilution on a per share basis:

Assumed public offering price per unit     $0.7623 
Historical net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2020 $0.31     
Pro forma increase in net tangible book value per share $0.05     
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2020 $0.36     
Increase in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share attributable to this offering and other transactions discussed above occurring in connection with this offering $0.07     
         
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2020, after giving effect to this offering     $0.43 
         
Dilution in as adjusted net tangible book value per share to new investors in this offering     $0.3323 

If the underwriter exercises its option to purchase additional shares of common stock in full at the public offering price of $0.7623 per share, less underwriting discounts and commissions, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value after this offering would be approximately $41.8 million, or $0.44 per share, representing an increase in net tangible book value per share by approximately $0.01 to existing stockholders and $0.32 dilution in net tangible book value per share to investors purchasing our securities in this offering at the public offering price. The foregoing amounts exclude the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the Series G Warrants issued in this offering.

A $0.10 increase in the assumed public offering price of $0.7623 per unit, which is the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NYSE American on January 26, 2021, would increase our net tangible book value per share after this offering by approximately $0.02, and increase dilution per share to new investors by approximately $0.08, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses payable by us.The foregoing amounts exclude the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the Series G Warrants issued in this offering.

A $0.10 decrease in the assumed public offering price of $0.7623 per unit, which is the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NYSE American on January 26, 2021, would decrease our net tangible book value per share after this offering by approximately $0.02, and decrease dilution per share to new investors by approximately $0.08, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses payable by us.The foregoing amounts exclude the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the Series G Warrants issued in this offering.

We may also increase or decrease the number of units we are offering. An increase or decrease of 100,000 units offered by us would have no effect on our net tangible book value per share after this offering, and have no significant impact on dilution per share to new investors, after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses payable by us. The information discussed above is illustrative only and will adjust based on the actual offering price, the actual number of units we offer in this offering, and other terms of this offering determined at pricing.

The above discussion and table are based on 36,059,128 shares outstanding as of September 30, 2020, and excludes, as of that date:

26,705,502 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding warrants, with an exercise price ranging from $0.495 to $32,266 per share and having a weighted average exercise price of $1.82 per share;
2,220,552 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the outstanding Series B Preferred Stock (including the payment of the cumulative dividends accrued on the Series B Preferred Stock in an aggregate of 951,665 shares of common stock), at the conversion price of $0.45 per share and the stated value per share of $33.00;
33,322 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the outstanding Series C Preferred Stock at the conversion price of $0.45 per share and the stated value per share of $6.40;
1,155,522 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options with exercise prices ranging from $0.001 to $3,675,000 and having a weighted average exercise price of $48 per share;
182,381 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of Restricted Stock Units outside our 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan;
1,175,287 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of Restricted Stock Units under our 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan; and
2,606,576 shares of common stock available for future issuance under our 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan

To the extent that any of our already outstanding preferred stock are converted, any of the options listed above are exercised, new options are issued under our equity incentive plans and subsequently exercised or we issue additional shares of common stock in the future, there will be further dilution to new investors participating in this offering.

INFORMATION REGARDING THE MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK

Our outstanding Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is subject to full-ratchet anti-dilution protection in the event we sell any common stock ortrades on the NYSE American under the symbol “NSPR.” The last reported sale price for our common stock equivalents (subjecton January 26, 2021, was $0.7623 per share. As of January 26, 2021, we had approximately 265 holders of record of our common stock, which sales price does not account for the Planned Reverse Split we intend to exceptions for certain exempt issuances) at a price lower thaneffect following the then-conversion price of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock ($8.25 prior to this offering, which will adjust to the Preferred Stock conversion price as a resultconsummation of this offering). Additionally, the Preferred Stock included in the units offered pursuant to this prospectus will also be subject to full-ratchet anti-dilution adjustment in the event we sell common stock or common stock equivalents (subject to exceptions for certain exempt issuances) at a price lower than the then-conversion price of the Preferred Stock.offering. The full-ratchet anti-dilution protection applicable to our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the Preferred Stock included in the units offered pursuant to this prospectus is further described below under the captions “Description of Securities – Series B Convertible Preferred Stock,” “Description of Securities -- Potential Common Stock Issuances to the Holders of Our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock” and “Description of Securities– Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Being Issued in this Offering” respectively.

We may sell less than 750,000 units . An increase of 10,000 units in the number of units sold by us would increaserecord holders was determined from the records of our as adjusted net tangible book value after this offering by approximately $92,000 , or $0.005 per share,transfer agent and the dilution per sharedoes not include beneficial owners of common stock to new investors would be approximately $1.37 per share, assuming conversion of all of the Preferred Stock includedwhose shares are held in the units into sharesnames of common stockvarious security brokers, dealers and that the public offering price remains the same and after deducting estimated placement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses payable by us.

Similarly, a decrease of 10,000 units in the number of units sold by us would decrease our as adjusted net tangible book value after this offering by approximately $92,000 , or $0.005 per share, and the dilution per share to new investors would be approximately $1.37 per share, assuming conversion of all of the Preferred Stock included in the units into shares of common stock and that the public offering price remains the same and after deducting estimated placement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses payable by us.

Assuming the sale of all units offered by us in this offering and assuming the conversion of all of the Preferred Stock included in the units into shares of common stock, each $1.00 increase (decrease) in the anticipated public offering price of $10.00 per unit would increase (decrease) our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value by approximately $690,000 , the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share by approximately $0.16 per share and the dilution to investors in this offering by approximately $0.09 per share, assuming the number of units offered by us and the number of shares of Preferred Stock and the Warrants included in the units remain the same as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and after deducting estimated placement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses payable by us. The information discussed above is illustrative only and will adjust based on the actual public offering price, the number of securities sold and other terms of this offering determined at pricing.

registered clearing agencies.

 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

 

You should read the following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes thereto that are included elsewhere in this prospectus. In addition to historical information, the following discussion and analysis includes forward-looking information that involves risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated by these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those discussed under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Overview

 

We are a medical device company focusing on the development and commercialization of our proprietary MicroNetMicroNet™ stent platform technology for the treatment of complex vascular and coronary disease. A stent is an expandable “scaffold-like” device, usually constructed of a metallic material, that is inserted into an artery to expand the inside passage and improve blood flow. Our MicroNet, a micron mesh sleeve, is wrapped over a stent to provide embolic protection in stenting procedures.

 

Our CGuard™ carotid embolic prevention system (“CGuard EPSEPS”) combines MicroNet and a self-expandable nitinol stent in a single device for use in carotid artery applications. Our CGuard EPS received CE mark approval in the European Union in March 2013 and wewas fully launched its release on a limited basis in October 2014. In January 2015, a new version of CGuard, with a rapid exchange delivery system, received CE mark approval in Europe and in September 2015, we announced the full market launch of CGuard EPS in Europe.2015. Subsequently, we launched CGuard EPS in ArgentinaRussia and Colombia,certain countries in Latin America and have received regulatory approval to commercializeAsia, including India. In September, 2020, we launched CGuard EPS in Russia. IfBrazil after receiving regulatory approval in July 2020, and we receive sufficient proceedsare seeking strategic partners for a potential launch of CGuard EPS in Japan and China.

On September 8, 2020, we received approval from the exerciseFDA of the Series C Warrants, we planour IDE, thereby allowing us to develop CGuard EPSproceed with a smaller delivery catheter (5 French gauge), whichpivotal study of our CGuard™ Carotid Stent System, CARENET-III, for prevention of stroke in patients in the United States.

With the proceeds of this offering, we intend to submitcontinue to invest in current and future potential product and manufacturing enhancements for CE mark approval within three calendar quartersCGuard EPS that are expected to reduce cost of receiving such proceeds. goods and/or provide the best-in-class performing delivery system. In furtherance of our strategy that focuses on establishing CGuard EPS as a viable alternative to vascular surgery, we are exploring adding a procedural protection device to our portfolio.

We cannot give any assurance that we will receive sufficient (or any) proceeds fromconsider the exerciseaddressable market for our CGuard EPS to be individuals with diagnosed, symptomatic high-grade carotid artery stenosis (HGCS, ≥70% occlusion) for whom intervention is preferable to medical (drug) therapy. This group includes not only carotid artery stenting patients but also individuals undergoing carotid endarterectomy, as the two approaches compete for the same patient population. Assuming full penetration of the Series C Warrants or the timing of receipt of such proceeds, if ever. We cannot predict when or if the Series C Warrants will be exercised. It is possibleintervention caseload by CGuard EPS, we estimate that the Series C Warrants may expireaddressable market for CGuard EPS was approximately $1.0 billion in 2017 (source: Health Research International 2017 Results of Update Report on Global Carotid Stenting Procedures and may never be exercised.Markets by Major Geography and Addressable Markets).

 

Our MGuard™ Prime™ embolic protection system (“MGuard Prime EPSEPS”) is marketed for use in patients with acute coronary syndromes, notably acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) and saphenous vein graft coronary interventions (bypass surgery). MGuard Prime EPS combines MicroNet with a bare-metal cobalt-chromium based stent. We market and sell MGuard Prime EPS for the treatment of coronary disease in the European Union. MGuard Prime EPS received CE mark approval in the European Union in October 2010 for improving luminal diameter and providing embolic protection. However, as a result of a shift in industry preferences away from bare-metal stents in favor of drug-eluting (drug-coated) stents, in 2014 we decided to curtail further development of this product in order to focus on the development of a drug-eluting stent product, MGuard DES.DES™. Due to limited resources, though,however, our efforts have been limited to testing drug-eluting stents manufactured by potential partners for compatibility with MicroNet and seeking to incorporate MicroNet onto a drug-eluting stent manufactured by a potential partner.

We The FDA has clarified that the primary mode of action for drug-eluting cardiovascular stents, which are also developing a neurovascular flow diverter, NGuard, whichregulated as combination products, is an endovascularthat of the device that directs blood flow away from cerebral aneurysms in ordercomponent and has assigned the FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) primary responsibility for premarket review and regulation, providing some clarity about what to ultimately sealexpect regarding the aneurysms. Our flow diverter would utilize an open cell, highly flexible metal scaffoldregulatory framework related to which MicroNet would be attached. We have completed initial pre-clinical testing of this product in both simulated bench models and standard in vivo pre-clinical models. However, as we plan to focus our resources on the further expansion of our sales and marketing activities for CGuard EPS and MGuard Prime EPS and, provided that we have sufficient resources, the development of CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter (5 French gauge) and its submission for CE mark approval, we do not intend to resume further development of NGuard until at least the third quarter of 2018.MGuard DES™.

 

We also intend to develop a pipeline of other products and additional applications by leveraging our MicroNet technology to new applications to improve peripheral vascular and neurovascular procedures, such as the treatment of the superficial femoral artery disease, vascular disease below the knee and neurovascular stenting to open diseased vesselsseal aneurysms in the brain.

 

Presently, none of our products may be sold or marketed in the United States.

DuringRecent Developments

Distribution and Purchase Agreement with Chinese Partners

On February 3, 2021, we entered into a Distribution Agreement with three China-based partners, pursuant to which the first quarter of 2015, we implemented a cost reduction/focused spending plan. The plan had four components: (i) reducing headcount; (ii) limitingChinese partners will be responsible for conducting the focus of clinical and development expenses to only carotid and neurovascular products; (iii) limiting sales and marketing expenses to those related to the CGuard EPS stent launch; and (iv) reducing all other expenses (including conferences, travel, promotional expenses, executive cash salaries, director cash fees, rent, etc.). In addition, we decided to alter ournecessary registration trials for commercial strategy by using third party distributors to drive future sales, as opposed to direct sales to hospitals and clinics, which had previously been our focus. However, we have decided to shift our commercial strategy to focus on direct salesapproval of our products throughin China, followed by an eight-year exclusive distribution right to sell our own internal sales initiatives as well as through distribution partners. products in China with the term of the agreement continuing on a year-to-year basis unless terminated. Under the Distribution Agreement, the China-based partners will be subject to minimum purchase obligations. The Distribution Agreement may be terminated for cause upon failure to meet minimum purchase obligations, failure to obtain regulatory approvals or for other material breaches.

In addition, and on the same day, we entered into an investment transaction with QIDI, which included (i) an SPA, pursuant to which QIDI agreed to invest $900,000 in exchange for shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.6708 per share, and (ii) an IRA, whereby QIDI was provided certain customary registration rights, including a commitment by us to file a registration statement with the SEC on Form S-1 or Form S-3 and have begunsuch registration statement become effective not later than 150 days following the closing of the transactions under the SPA.

The transactions are expected to participate in international trade shows and industry conferences in an attempt to gain market exposure and brand recognition.close this month.

 

Recent EventsSixth Amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan

 

Effective as of 5:00 p.m. Eastern TimeAugust 31, 2020, our stockholders approved the Sixth Amendment to the Plan and, accordingly, increased the number of shares of common stock available for issuance pursuant to awards under such Plan by 6,500,000 shares, to a total of 7,178,395 shares of Common Stock.

Regained Compliance with New York Stock Exchange

On August 7, 2019, we received a notification from the NYSE American that we did not meet the continued listing standards of the NYSE American as set forth in Part 10 of the Company Guide. Specifically, we were not in compliance with Section 1003(a)(iii) of the Company Guide because we reported stockholders’ equity of less than $6 million as of September 30, 2019, and net losses in our five most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2018. As a result, we became subject to the procedures and requirements of Section 1009 of the Company Guide. On October 11, 2019, the NYSE American accepted our plan to regain compliance with Section 1003(a)(iii) of the Company Guide by August 7, 2020.

On August 7, 2020, following our submission to the NYSE American of our plan for regaining compliance, the NYSE American approved such plan and, accordingly and as of such date, we are compliant with all of the NYSE American LLC continued listing standards set forth in Part 10 of the NYSE American Company Guide. In particular, we regained compliance with the continued listing requirement under NYSE American Company Guide Section 1003(a)(iii). The return to compliance was achieved as a result of our recently-consummated public offering, in which we raised approximately $10.7 million of net proceeds from the sale of units and pre-funded units.

FDA Approval of IDE

On September 8, 2020, we received approval from the FDA of our IDE, thereby allowing us to proceed with a pivotal study of our CGuard™ Carotid Stent System, CARENET-III, for prevention of stroke in patients in the United States.

ATM Offering

On July 28, 2020, we entered into a Sales Agreement with A.G.P. in connection with the ATM Facility. Any shares to be offered and sold under the Sales Agreement will be issued and sold pursuant to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-223130), filed with the SEC on February 21, 2018 and the prospectus supplement thereto filed with the SEC on July 28, 2020, by methods deemed to be an “at the market offering” as defined in Rule 415(a)(4) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or if specified by us, by any other method permitted by law. On January 11, 2021, we increased the aggregate amount of our shares of common stock that may be sold under the Sales Agreement from $9,300,000 to $10,382,954, and, as a result, utilized and sold the maximum amount allowable under the ATM Facility, which resulted in an aggregate amount of $10,381,958.

Public Offerings

On June 5, 2020, we closed an underwritten public offering of (i) 7,635,800 Units, with each Unit being comprised of one share of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and one Series F warrant to purchase one share of common stock, and (ii) 14,586,400 Pre-Funded Units, with each Pre-Funded Unit being comprised of one Pre-Funded Warrant to purchase one share of common stock and one Series F Warrant. In connection with this public offering, the underwriter exercised the option practically in full, for 3,333,300 shares of common stock and 3,333,300 Series F Warrants. The offering price to the public was $0.45 per Unit and $0.449 per Pre-Funded Unit. Our net proceeds from the offering and the exercise of the underwriter’s over-allotment option were approximately $10.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and payment of other estimated expenses associated with the offering, but excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of Series F Warrants and the Pre-Funded Warrants sold in the offering.

43

Registration Clearance for CGuard™ MicroNet® in Brazil

On July 23, 2020, we announced that we obtained registration from the Brazilian registration authority, Agéncia Nacional de Vigiláncia Sanitária (ANVISA), for our CGuard MicroNet covered stent, clearing it for sale and distribution in Brazil.

New Trial Results for CGuard EPS

On June 10, 2020, we reported the publication of the results of our PARADIGM trial in the EuroIntervention journal. In that trial, 101 unselected consecutive real-life patients were treated with our CGuard MicroNET covered stent for carotid stenosis and were monitored for postprocedural neurologic events for a period of 12 months. The results displayed sustained protection against any such neurologic events. At 30 days, only one adverse event occurred (a minor transient stroke with no other strokes, myocardial infarctions, or deaths). Furthermore, those study results showed that no strokes occurred between 30 days and twelve months.

On June 25, 2020, we reported the results from an investigator-initiated SIBERIA randomized clinical trial of our CGuard EPS, which evaluated 30-day silent brain infarcts associated with the use of the Acculink™ conventional open-cell nitinol stent vs. our CGuard Micronet-covered stent. Those results displayed that CGuard had a statistically significant (greater than three-fold) reduction in the procedure-generated mean cerebral lesion volume relative to Acculink. At 30 days, there were zero new cerebral lessons in the CGuard arm, compared to six in the Acculink arm, also statistically significant.

On September 3, 2020 we reported the award for Best ESC Congress Poster for the presentation of updated data from the large, long-term PARADIGM-EXTEND study of the CGuard™ Embolic Prevention System (EPS), as part of the European Society of Cardiology 2020 Carotid Update e-presentation at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress 2020. PARADIGM/EXTEND is an investigator-driven on-going study performed with CGuard Carotid stent for primary and secondary stroke prevention in a large, consecutive all-comers population, with 5 years (60 months) follow-up. The results for 480 patients of the expected total of 550 that completed the 30-day follow-up were presented were no peri-procedural major strokes or death. The total death/stroke /myocardial incidence at 30 days was 1.04% (5/480) due to two minor strokes, one myocardial infarction and two stent-unrelated deaths. In the study, 354/480 patients completed the 12-month follow-up with only 1 patient experiencing in-stent restenosis, 0.28% (1/354). At the 12-month follow-up there were no other device-related adverse clinical events. Finally, 46/480 patients completed the 60-month follow-up period with one more case of in-stent restenosis and no additional cases of device-related stroke.

Appointment of Dr. Gary Roubin, M.D. to our Board of Directors

On October 12, 2020, our board of directors, or the Board, appointed Dr. Gary S. Roubin as a Class I member of the Board, effective as of that date, with a term expiring at the Company’s 2021 annual meeting of stockholders. Dr. Roubin is an internationally renowned interventional cardiologist recognized for his pioneering work in carotid stenting and embolic and protection devices. He is also acknowledged for the development of coronary stenting and the first FDA-approved coronary stent. In connection with his appointment, Dr. Roubin was granted options to purchase 79,650 shares of common stock and 238,950 shares of restricted stock. Shortly after his appointment as a director, and on October 7, 2016,16, 2020, Dr. Roubin invested $100,000 in the Company in exchange for 222,223 units consisting of (i) one share of common stock and (ii) one warrant to purchase our common stock with an exercise price of $0.495. For additional biographical information about Dr. Roubin, please see “Management” herein.

COVID-19 Developments

In an effort to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19, which the World Health Organization, or WHO, declared to be a pandemic on March 12, 2020, many countries have imposed unprecedented restrictions on travel, quarantines and other public health safety measures. As of the beginning of the second quarter of 2020, we amendedbegan to experience a significant COVID-19 related impact on our certificatefinancial condition and results of incorporationoperations, which we primarily attribute to the postponement of CGuard EPS procedures (non-emergency procedures), as hospitals shifted resources to patients affected by COVID-19. To our knowledge, most European countries in which we operate are slowly reinstating elective procedures, but we do not know when the hospitals will resume to normal pre-pandemic levels with such procedures in light of recent increases in COVID-19 cases in the territories we sell into. We anticipate that the continuation of the pandemic and related restrictions and safety measures would likely result in continued fluctuations in sales of our products for the upcoming periods. For more discussion on our risks related to COVID-19, please see risk factors included under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” herein.

In response to significant market volatility and uncertainties relating to COVID-19, the fees and salaries of our Board, management and most of our employees were reduced in order to effectuatealleviate corporate operating expenses.

Effective April 1, 2020, the Board approved a 1-for-25 reverse stock split50% decrease in the annual cash compensation for non-employee directors from an aggregate amount of $154,000 to $77,000.

On April 21, 2020, Marvin Slosman, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, signed a waiver reducing his monthly base salary from $33,333 to $16,666 for the period beginning April 1, 2020 and ending on such date as Mr. Slosman was to determine, and Craig Shore, our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, Secretary and Treasurer, signed a waiver reducing his monthly base salary from NIS 80,125 to NIS 40,063 for the period beginning April 1, 2020 and ending on such date as Mr. Shore was to determine.

Effective April 1, 2020, we reduced the annual salaries of most of our outstandingemployees by 20% to 30% until further notice.

Based on a determination made by each of Mr. Slosman and Mr. Shore on June 10, 2020, following the closing of our underwritten public offering in June 2020, as described above, each of Mr. Slosman’s and Mr. Shore’s monthly base salaries were reinstated to $33,333 and NIS 80,125, respectively, effective as of June 1, 2020. Each of the salaries for the remaining officers, directors and employees was similarly reinstated by no later than June 30, 2020.

As a result of the reduction of those fees and salaries during the second quarter of 2020, our operating expenses were reduced by approximately $235,000 in the second quarter of 2020.

Release from Former Underwriter

The terms of our engagement of the underwriter for our September 2019 financing contained a purported 12 month right of first refusal in favor of such underwriter with respect to future financings. Due to, among other things, difficulties in the relationship with that prior underwriter and our need to raise additional funds to finance our ongoing operations, we engaged A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners in May 2020 as underwriter for our June 2020 public offering, and again in July 2020 for an At-the-market offering (ATM).

On July 28, 2020, we entered into a settlement agreement and release with that prior underwriter, under which it provided us a final, unconditional release from any further obligations arising out of or related to the engagement agreements, underwriting agreements and placement agency agreements which we had been party to with it and with respect to any services which it had provided to us. We, in turn, provided the prior underwriter a final, unconditional release from any further obligations arising out of or related to the prior agreements and services.

As consideration for the final release provided to us, we paid to the prior underwriter $400,000 in cash and reduced, to $0.495, the exercise price per share of warrants to purchase 274,029 shares of our common stock.stock that had been issued by us to the prior underwriter in various offerings that took place between March 2018 and September 2019. That reduced exercise price represents the exercise price for the Series F Warrants that we issued in our June 2020 public offering. The warrants that were repriced had existing exercise prices per share ranging from $187.50 to $2.25 and a weighted average exercise price per share of $7.32. All other terms of those warrants remained unchanged. The related increase in expenses of $400,000 was recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2020 to “General and Administrative expense” within the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

We prepared our consolidated financial statements for inclusion in this prospectus in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”). U.S. GAAP represents a comprehensive set of accounting and disclosure rules and requirements, and applying these rules and requirements requires management judgments and estimates including, in certain circumstances, choices between acceptable U.S. GAAP alternatives. The following is a discussion of our most critical accounting policies, judgments and uncertainties that are inherent in our application of U.S. GAAP.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates using assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

As applicable to these consolidated financial statements, the most significant estimates and assumptions relate to inventory valuations, share-based compensation and legal contingencies.

Functional currency

The currency of the primary economic environment in which our operations and the operations of our subsidiaries are conducted is the U.S. dollar (“$” or “dollar”). Accordingly, our and our subsidiaries’ functional currency is the U.S. dollar.

The dollar figures are determined as follows: transactions and balances originally denominated in dollars are presented in their original amounts. Balances in foreign currencies are translated into dollars using historical and current exchange rates for non-monetary and monetary balances, respectively. The resulting translation gains or losses are recorded as financial income or expense, as appropriate. For transactions reflected in the statements of operations in foreign currencies, the exchange rates at transaction dates are used. Depreciation and changes in inventories and other changes deriving from non-monetary items are based on historical exchange rates.

 38

Concentration of credit risk and allowance for doubtful accounts

Financial instruments that may potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents, which are deposited in major financially sound institutions in the United States, Israel and Germany, and trade accounts receivable. Our trade accounts receivable are derived from revenues earned from customers from various countries. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and, generally, require no collateral from customers. We also have a credit insurance policy for some customers. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based upon the expected ability to collect the accounts receivable. We review our allowance for doubtful accounts quarterly by assessing individual accounts receivable and all other balances based on historical collection experience and an economic risk assessment. If we determine that a specific customer is unable to meet its financial obligations to us, we provide an allowance for credit losses to reduce the receivable to the amount management reasonably believes will be collected, which is netted against “Accounts receivable — Trade”.

Inventory

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (cost is determined on a “first-in, first-out” basis) or market value. Our inventories generally have a limited shelf life and are subject to impairment as they approach their expiration dates. We regularly evaluate the carrying value of our inventories and when, based on such evaluation, factors indicate that impairment has occurred, we impair the inventories’ carrying value.

Revenue recognition

Revenue is recognized when delivery has occurred, evidence of an arrangement exists, title and risks and rewards for the products are transferred to the customer and collection is reasonably assured.

We recognize revenue net of value added tax (VAT).

Research and development costs

Research and development costs are charged to the statement of operations as incurred.

Share-based compensation

Employee option awards are classified as equity awards and accounted for using the grant-date fair value method. The fair value of share-based awards is estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model and expensed over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. Until December 31, 2015, we estimated forfeitures based on historical experience and anticipated future conditions. Beginning on January 1, 2016, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09 and elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. See Note 2s4 to our financial statements for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 included in this prospectus.

We elected to recognize compensation expenses for awards with only service conditions that have graded vesting schedules using the accelerated multiple option approach.

In addition, certain of our share-based awards are market- and performance-based and dependent upon achieving certain goals. With respect to performance-based awards, we estimate the expected pre-vesting award probability that the performance conditions will be achieved. We only recognize expense for those shares that are expected to vest.

Fair value measurementContingencies

 

We measure fair value and disclose fair value measurementsour subsidiaries are involved in legal proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business. We record accruals for financial assets and liabilities. Fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

The accounting standard establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

In determining fair value, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the usethese types of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputscontingencies to the extent possiblethat we conclude the occurrence of such contingencies is probable and consider counterparty credit riskthat the related liabilities are estimable. When accruing these costs, we recognize an accrual in our assessmentthe amount within a range of fair value.loss that is the best estimate within the range. When no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, we accrue for the minimum amount within the range. Legal costs are expensed as incurred.

 

Results of Operations

 

TwelveNine months ended December 31 , 2016September 30, 2020 compared to the twelvenine months ended December 31 , 2015September 30, 2019

Revenues. For the twelvenine months ended December 31 , 2016,September 30, 2020, revenue decreased by $416,000 ,$381,000, or 18.0% 14.1%, to $1,894,000 ,$2,327,000, from $2,310,000$2,708,000 during the twelvenine months ended December 31 , 2015.September 30, 2019. This decrease was predominantly driven by a 53.5%11.5% decrease in sales volume of CGuard EPS from $2,344,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2019, to $2,075,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, mainly due to the postponement of procedures with CGuard EPS, which are generally scheduled or non-emergency procedures, as hospitals shifted resources to patients affected by COVID-19. In addition, there was a 30.8% decrease in sales volume of MGuard Prime EPS from $1,607,000 in 2015$364,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2019, to $747,000 in 2016, largely driven by doctors increasingly using drug-eluting stents rather than bare metal stents like MGuard Prime EPS in STEMI patients. This decrease in MGuard Prime EPS sales was partially offset by a 63.2% increase in sales$252,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, mainly due to the impact of CGuard EPS from $703,000 in 2015 to $1,147,000 in 2016.COVID-19, as mentioned above.

 

With respect to regions, the decrease in revenue was primarily attributable toto: a $173,000 decrease of $586,000 in revenue from sales made in Europe (driven by a $107,000 decrease of CGuard EPS sales and $66,000 decrease of MGuard Prime EPS from our distributorssales due to the COVID-19-related factor identified in Europe andthe paragraph above), a decrease of $257,000$128,000 in revenue of CGuard from sales made in Asia and Middle East due to the same COVID-19-related factor, as well as a decrease of $48,000 in revenue from sales made in Latin America (primarily driven by a $43,000 decrease of MGuard Prime EPS from our distributors in Latin America, partially offset by an increase of $383,000 in revenue from sales of CGuard EPS from our distributors in Europe.due to the same COVID-19-related factor).

Gross Profit (Loss). For the twelvenine months ended December 31 , 2016, we had aSeptember 30, 2020, gross profit (revenue less cost of revenues) of $102,000 decreased by 4.8%, asor $24,000, to $473,000, compared to a gross loss (revenue less cost of revenues) of $296,000 , during$497,000 for the twelve months ended December 31 , 2015, representing an increase of $398,000 .same period in 2019. This increasedecrease in gross profit was attributable toresulted from a $119,000 decrease of write-offs of inventory (primarily MGuard Prime EPS) of $593,000 during 2016, as compared to 2015, a decrease of $317,000 in revenues (as mentioned above), less the related material and labor costs (due to the decreased sales) and acosts. This decrease of $86,000 in miscellaneous expenses. These increases in gross profit werewas partially offset by a decrease of $69,000 in revenues of $416,000 (see above for explanation) and an increase of $182,000expenses related to upgrades made to our production facilities during the underutilizationnine months ended September 30, 2019, which did not reoccur during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and a decrease of our manufacturing resources.$26,000 in miscellaneous expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2020. Gross margin (gross profits as a percentage of revenue) increased to 5.4%20.3% during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 from 18.4% during the nine months ended September 30, 2019, driven by the reasons mentioned above.

Research and Development Expenses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, research and development expenses decreased by 37.8%, or $919,000, to $1,513,000, from $2,432,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. This decrease resulted primarily from: a decrease of $708,000 in clinical expenses associated with CGuard EPS, mainly related to the IDE approval process, of which an approval from the FDA was received on September 8, 2020, a decrease of $354,000 due to settlement expenses that were paid to a former service provider pursuant to a settlement agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2019, which did not reoccur during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, and a decrease of $150,000 in quality assurance and regulatory expenses related to the development of various projects during the nine months ended September 30, 2019, which were significantly reduced during the nine months ended September 30, 2020. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $280,000 in development expenses related to CGuard EPS enhancements and an increase of $13,000 in miscellaneous expenses.

Selling and Marketing Expenses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, selling and marketing expenses decreased by 17.0%, or $305,000, to $1,486,000, from $1,791,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. This decrease resulted primarily from: a decrease in travel expenses of $195,000 in light of restrictions imposed by governments worldwide in order to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, a decrease of $91,000 in promotional expenses, primarily related to having already built our social media infrastructure in 2019, and a decrease of $19,000 in miscellaneous expenses.

General and Administrative Expenses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, general and administrative expenses increased by 15.4%, or $552,000, to $4,136,000, from $3,584,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. This increase resulted primarily from an increase of $400,000 due to expenses for the settlement agreement with the underwriter of our prior offerings paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, an increase in our Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance expenses of $115,000 partially due to recent economic effects on the insurance industry caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase in regulatory expenses of $130,000 required for new regulatory standards and an increase of $18,000 in miscellaneous expenses, offset, in part, by a decrease in travel expenses of $111,000 in light of restrictions imposed by governments worldwide in order to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 during the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

Financial Expenses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, financial expenses decreased by 83.2%, or $144,000, to $29,000, from $173,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The decrease in financial expenses primarily resulted from a decrease of $154,000 in financial expenses related to changes in exchange rates, offset, in part, by an increase of $10,000 in miscellaneous expenses.

Tax Expenses (Income). For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, there was no material change in our tax expenses as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

Net Loss. Our net loss decreased by $792,000, or 10.6%, to $6,691,000, for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, from $7,483,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The decrease in net loss resulted primarily from a decrease of $672,000 in operating expenses and a decrease of $144,000 in financial expenses, offset, in part, by a decrease of $24,000 in gross profit.

Twelve months ended December 31, 2019 compared to the twelve months ended December 31, , 2016 from ( 12 .8) % during 2015.2018

Revenues. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, revenue increased by $120,000, or 3.3%, to $3,721,000, from $3,601,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018. This increase was predominantly driven by a 10.0% increase in sales volume of CGuard EPS from $2,970,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, to $3,265,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019. This increase was primarily due to our continued focus on expanding existing markets such as Poland, Switzerland, Italy, and Spain and expansion into new geographies such as Australia and South Africa. This increase was offset by a 27.7% decrease in sales volume of MGuard Prime EPS from $631,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, to $456,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, largely driven by the predominant industry preferences favoring drug-eluting stents rather than bare metal stents such as MGuard Prime EPS in STEMI patients.

In addition, the overall increase mentioned above was offset across the board by shipment delays in the three months ended March 31, 2019 associated with our then third-party sterilizer’s equipment failure and us having to switch to a new sterilizer. The transition to our new sterilization company was completed in early April 2019 and we do not currently anticipate any future disruptions in fulfilling new orders.

With respect to regions, the increase in revenue was primarily attributable to an increase of $78,000 in revenue from sales made in Australia and South Africa (driven by $78,000 growth of CGuard EPS for reasons mentioned above), as well as an increase of $25,000 in revenue from sales made in Europe (driven by $168,000 growth of CGuard EPS for reasons mentioned above, offset by a $143,000 decrease in sales of MGuard Prime EPS).

Gross Profit. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, gross profit (revenue less cost of revenues) decreased by 24.0%, or $239,000, to $756,000, compared to a $995,000 for the same period in 2018. This decrease in gross profit resulted from a $142,000 increase in write-offs predominantly driven by a non-recurring component supply issue of CGuard EPS and slow moving inventory of MGuard Prime EPS, $69,000 of expenses related to upgrades made to our production facilities and $48,000 of expenses pertaining to annual and new employee training of the production workers, and offset by a reduction of $20,000 in miscellaneous expenses. Gross margin (gross profits as a percentage of revenue) decreased to 20.3% during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 from 27.6% during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, driven mainly by the write-offs and the increased expenses incurred in connection with the upgrades made to our production facilities and employee trainings incurred during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019.

Research and Development Expenses. For the twelve months ended December 31, , 2016,2019, research and development expenses decreasedincreased by 64.6% 92.4%, or $2,351,000 ,$1,419,000, to $1,291,000 ,$2,954,000, from $3,642,000$1,535,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018. This increase resulted primarily from an increase of $804,000 in clinical expenses associated with CGuard EPS, mainly related to IDE application process, a settlement payment of $354,000 made to a former service provider pursuant to a settlement agreement (see Part II, Item 1. “Legal Proceedings” below), 2015. This decreaseand an increase of $298,000 in compensation expenses primarily incurred to support various development projects. These increases in research and development expenses resulted primarily fromwere partially offset by a decrease of $1,282,000 in compensation expenses, a decrease of $543,000 in clinical trial and development costs associated with CGuard EPS, a decrease of $292,000 in clinical trial expenses associated with our now terminated MASTER II trial and a decrease of $234,000$37,000 in miscellaneous expenses. The decreases in compensation and miscellaneous expenditures related to MGuard Prime EPS are the results of the implementation of our cost reduction/focused spending plan that began in the first quarter of 2015.

 

Selling and Marketing Expenses. For the twelve months ended December 31, , 2016,2019, selling and marketing expenses decreasedincreased by 54.1% 6.9%, or $1,719,000 ,$155,000, to $1,459,000 ,$2,396,000, from $3,178,000 during the twelve months ended 2015. This decrease in selling and marketing expenses resulted primarily from a decrease of $1,113,000 in compensation expenses due to our transition away from direct sales in favor of using third party distributors, a decrease of $281,000 in travel expenses associated with the decreased size of our sales force, a decrease of $180,000 in expenditures related to our reduced participation in trade shows and promotional activities , primarily the EuroPCR Congress, incurred in 2015, and a decrease of $145,000 in miscellaneous expenditures. The decrease in spending was a result of our cost reduction/focused spending plan that began in the first quarter of 2015 .

General and Administrative Expenses. For the twelve months ended December 31 , 2016, general and administrative expenses decreased by 21.7% , or $1,387,000 , to $5,000,000 , from $6,387,000$2,241,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, , 2015. The decrease2018. This increase resulted from an increase of $61,000 in generaltravel expenses associated with our efforts to expand existing and administrativenew markets, an increase of $90,000 in promotional expenses, resulted primarily from a decreaserelated to operating our social media infrastructure and increase of $791,000 in compensation expenses, a decrease of $507,000 in consulting fees and a decrease of $89,000$4,000 in miscellaneous expenses. The reduction in compensation expenses mainly related to the forfeiture of the unvested restricted shares caused by our former chief executive officer’s resignation in 2016. The reduction in consulting fees related to recruitment and business development activities in 2015, which we did not undertake in 2016.

Restructuring and Impairment Expenses. Forduring the twelve months ended December 31, , 2015, we incurred $982,000 of restructuring and impairment expenses made up of $576,000 of expenses related to the impairment of an MGuard Prime EPS royalty buyout option due to anticipated lower sales in the future, $246,000 of cash payouts and $59,000 of restricted shares given to terminated employees in connection with our restructuring and $101,000 associated with the early termination of our lease for a portion of our office in Boston, Massachusetts. No such expense was incurred in 2016.2019.

 

FinancialGeneral and Administrative Expenses. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, general and administrative expenses increased by 8.1%, 2016, financial expenses decreased by 25.9% or $284,000 ,$392,000, to $812,000,$5,222,000, from $1,096,000$4,830,000 during the twelve months ended 2015.December 31, 2018. This increase resulted primarily from an increase of $766,000 in compensation expenses, mainly due to compensation expenses related to the separation agreement with our former CEO and an increase of $31,000 in miscellaneous expenses. This increases in general and administrative expenses was partially offset by decrease of $405,000 in legal expenses, primarily due to reduced legal work required for a litigation with a former service provider (which settled in April 2019) during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, compared to the amount of legal work required for the same litigation during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018.

Financial Expenses (Income). For the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, financial expenses increased by 153.9%, or $571,000, to $200,000, from $371,000 of financial income during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018. The decreaseincrease in financial expenses primarily resulted from the $438,000 of financial income related to the revaluation of the embedded derivative of the Series C Preferred Stock recorded during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, which did not occur during the twelve months ended in December 31, 2019, and an increase of $144,000 in financial expenses related to changes in exchange rates. These increases in financial expenses were partially offset by a decrease of $11,000 in interestmiscellaneous expenses due toduring the reduction in principal of our outstanding indebtedness.twelve months ended December 31, 2019.

 

Tax Expenses (Income). For the twelve months ended December 31, , 2016, there was no material change in2019, tax expenses (income) compared to the same period in 2015.

Net Loss. Our net loss decreasedincreased by $7,124,000, or 45.7% , to $8,461,000 for the twelve months ended December 31 , 2016, from $15,585,000 during the twelve months ended December 31 , 2015. The decrease in net loss resulted primarily from a decrease of $6,439,000 in operating expenses primarily associated with our cost reduction/focused spending plan (see above for explanation), an increase of $398,000 in gross profit and a decrease of $284,000 in financial expenses.

 41

Twelve months ended December 31, 2015$24,000 compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 2014

Revenues. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, revenue decreased by $0.5 million, or 18.1%, to $2.3 million, from $2.8 million during the same period in 2014. This decrease was predominantly driven by a decrease in sales of our MGuard coronary products of $1.2 million, or 42.6%, from $2.8 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 to $1.6 million in the same period in 2015. This decrease in sales of MGuard Prime EPS was predominantly driven by a decrease in sales volume of $0.8 million, or 28.9% due to the trend of doctors increasingly using drug-eluting stents rather than bare metal stents in STEMI patients, which impacted current sales. Price decreases to our distributors drove the remaining decrease of $0.4 million, or 13.7%, of MGuard Prime EPS, due to lower average sales prices necessary to remain competitive amongst sharp price decreases in the coronary stent market, as well as the effects of the weakening of the Euro against the U.S dollar. These decreases, however, were partially offset by an increase of $0.7 million of sales of our new product CGuard EPS, which was launched in October 2014.

With respect to regions, the decrease in revenue was primarily attributable to a decrease of $0.7 million in revenue from our distributors in the Middle East and a decrease of $0.1 million in revenue from our distributors in Asia, partially offset by an increase of $0.3 million in revenue from our distributors in Europe.

Gross Profit (Loss). For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, we had a gross loss (revenue less cost of revenues) of $0.3 million, as compared to a gross profit of $0.8 million during the same period in 2014, representing a decrease of 137.8%, or $1.1 million. This decrease in gross profit was attributable to a decrease in revenues of $0.5 million (see above for explanation), an increase of write-offs of inventory of $0.4 million, which were primarily related to write-offs of MGuard Prime EPS units due to expected lower sales in the future resulting from industry preferences for drug eluting stents, and our transition to a third party distributor commercial strategy, an increase in labor and material costs of $0.3 million attributable to higher material and labor costs for CGuard EPS, as well as an increase of $0.3 million related to underutilization of our manufacturing resources. These increases, however, were partially offset by a decrease of $0.4 million in costs associated with a voluntary field action pursuant to which we temporarily withdrew our MGuard products from the market. Gross margin (gross profits as a percentage of revenue) decreased from 27.8% in the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 to (12.8)% in the same period in 2015. The decrease in gross margin of 40.6% was driven mainly by write-offs of inventory, the change in product mix, including a higher percentage of CGuard EPS, which has higher material and labor costs than our MGuard coronary products, and a lower average sales price of MGuard Prime EPS.

Research and Development Expenses. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, research and development expenses decreased by 58.3%, or $5.1 million, to $3.6 million, from $8.7 million during the same period in 2014. This decrease in research and development expenses resulted primarily from a decrease of $3.4 million in clinical trial expenses associated with our now terminated MASTER II trial, a decrease of $0.5 million in clinical trial and development costs associated with CGuard EPS, which were predominantly related to our CARENET (CARotidEmbolic protection using microNET) trial, a decrease of $0.3 million in compensation expenses, a decrease of $0.3 million of expenses related to our stent retention program, which we concluded in 2014, a decrease of $0.2 million in travel expenses and a decrease of $0.4 million in miscellaneous clinical and development expenditures related to MGuard Prime EPS. The decreases in compensation, travel and miscellaneous clinical and development expenditures related to MGuard Prime EPS are the results of the implementation of our cost reduction/focused spending plan in the first quarter of 2015. Research and development expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased to 157.7% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, from 310.3% in the same period in 2014.

Selling and Marketing Expenses. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, selling and marketing expenses decreased by 51.9%, or $3.4 million, to $3.2 million, from $6.6 million during the same period in 2014. This decrease in selling and marketing expenses resulted primarily from a decrease of $2.2 million in compensation expenses due to our transition away from direct sales in favor of using third party distributors, a decrease of $0.5 million in travel expenses associated with the decreased size of our sales force, a decrease of $0.5 million in trade show participation related expenditures and a decrease of $0.2 million in miscellaneous expenses. The decrease in spending of the above was a result of our cost reduction/focused spending plan. Selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased to 137.6% in the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, from 234.7% in the same period in 2014.

General and Administrative Expenses. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, general and administrative expenses decreased by 30.0%, or $2.7 million, to $6.4 million, from $9.1 million during the same period in 2014. The decrease in general and administrative expenses resulted primarily from a decrease of $2.1 million in compensation due to a decrease in share-based compensation driven by lower valued equity grants made to our management and directors, as well as a decrease in salary expenses due to a reduced headcount as part of our cost reduction/focused spending plan. In line with our cost reduction/focused spending plan, we also had a decrease of $0.2 million in legal expenses, a decrease of $0.1 million in travel expenditures and a decrease of $0.4 million in miscellaneous expenses. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased to 276.5% in the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 from 323.8% in the same period in 2014.

Restructuring and Impairment Expenses. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, we incurred $1.0 million of restructuring and impairment expenses made up of $0.6 million of expenses related to the impairment of an MGuard Prime EPS royalty buyout option due to anticipated lower sales in the future due to the shift in industry preferences away from bare metal stents in favor of drug eluting stents, $0.2 million of cash payouts and $0.1 million of restricted shares given to employees terminated in connection with our cost reduction/focused spending plan and $0.1 million in fees associated with our early exit from a portion of our lease in our Boston office. Restructuring and impairment expenses as a percentage of revenue was 42.5% for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.

Financial Expenses. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, financial expenses decreased by 20.9%, or $0.3 million, to $1.1 million, from $1.4 million during the same period in 2014. The decrease in financial expenses resulted from a decrease of $0.4 of interest expenses due to the reduction in principal of our outstanding indebtedness, partially offset by an increase in miscellaneous expenses of $0.1 million. Financial expenses as a percentage of revenue decreased to 47.4% in the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, from 49.1% in the same period in 2014.

Tax Expenses (Income). For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 there was no material change in tax expenses (income) compared to the same period in 2014.2018.

 

Net Loss. Our net loss decreasedincreased by $9.5 million,$2,800,000, or 37.9%38.7%, to $15.6 million$10,040,000, for the twelve months ended December 31, 20152019, from $25.1 million$7,240,000 during the same period in 2014.twelve months ended December 31, 2018. The decreaseincrease in net loss resulted primarily from a decreasean increase of $10.2 million$1,966,000 in operating expenses, primarily associated with lower research and developmentan increase of $571,000 in financial expenses due to our cost reduction/focused spending plan, and a decrease of $0.3 million in financial expenses, partially offset by a decrease of $1.0 million$239,000 in gross profit (see above for explanation).profit.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

We had an accumulated deficit as of December 31 , 2016September 30, 2020, of $132approximately $164 million, , as well as a net loss of $8,461,000$6,691,000 and negative operating cash flows.flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. We expect to continue incurring losses and negative cash flows from operations until our products (primarily CGuard EPS) reach commercial profitability. As a result of these expected losses and negative cash flows from operations, along with our current cash position, we only have sufficient resources to fund operations for a periodthrough the third quarter of up to six months from the date of this prospectus .2021. Therefore, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

Our plans include the continued commercialization of our products and raising capital through the sale of additional equity securities, debt or capital inflows from strategic partnerships. There are no assurances, however, that we will be successful in obtaining the level of financing needed for our operations. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant financial market volatility and uncertainty. A continuation or worsening of the levels of market disruption and volatility could have an adverse effect on our ability to access capital and on the market price of our common stock, and we may not be able to successfully raise capital through the sale of our securities. If we are unsuccessful in commercializing our products andor raising capital, we may need to reduce activities, curtail or cease operations.

On October 23, 2013, we entered into a loanEquity Financings and security agreement with Hercules, which was subsequently amended on November 19, 2013, July 23, 2014,Recapitalization

During January and June 13, 2016, pursuant to which we received a loan of $10 million, before deduction of issuance costs. Interest onFebruary 2018, the loan is determined on a daily basis at a variable rate equal to the greater of either (i) 10.5%, or (ii) the sum of (A) 10.5% plus (B) the prime rate minus 5.5%. In connection with the loan and security agreement, on October 23, 2013, we issued the lender a five year warrant to purchase 674 shares of our common stock at a per share exercise price of $742.50. The amendment to the loan and security agreement entered into on June 13, 2016, provides that, among other things, the principal payment otherwise due and payable will be suspended for a four month period beginning May 1, 2016, provided, that we receive unrestricted and unencumbered net cash proceeds in an amount of at least $10 millionplacement agent from the sale of our equity securities with investors acceptable to the lender on or prior to June 30, 2016. In addition, we agreed to increase the end of term charge from $500,000 to $520,000 on the earliest to occur of February 1, 2017, or when the loan is paid in full or matures. Our obligations under the loan and security agreement are secured by a grant of a security interest in substantially all of our assets. On June 13, 2016, in connection with the amendment to the loan and security agreement, we entered into a warrant agreement with the lender, pursuant to which we issued a five year warrant to purchase up to 38,691 shares of common stock. The principal payments due on May 1, 2016, and June 1, 2016, were suspended, and although the public offering that closed in July 2016 had not closed priorexercised its unit purchase option to June 30, 2016,purchase 13,508 units and received 13,508 shares of Series B Preferred Stock and Series A warrants to purchase 31 shares of common stock. The placement agent subsequently converted its Series B Preferred Stock and received an aggregate of 2,229 shares of common stock. We received an aggregate of $557,205 from the lender agreed to waiveplacement agent for the July 1, 2016, principal payment. Additionally, on July 6, 2016, the lender agreed to waive the August 1, 2016 principal payment, as well. The current principal amountexercise of the loan as of January 5, 2017, was approximately $1.9 million, and we are required to make monthly payments of interest and principal in the amount of approximately $380,000 per month. The term loan under the loan and security agreement, as amended, matures on June 1, 2017.unit purchase option.

 

On March 9, 2015,1, 2018, we sold 137,481closed an underwritten public offering of 20,000 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $150.00 per share. We received gross proceeds of approximately $3.0 million from the offering, before deducting underwriter discounts and warrantscommissions and offering expenses payable by us. Upon closing of the offering, we used $450,000 of the proceeds from the offering to purchase 137,481redeem 450 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series D Preferred Stock”), pursuant to a waiver agreement with a holder of the Series D Preferred Stock (the “Series D Investor”), dated February 26, 2018. As a result of such offering, the conversion price for each of our Series C Preferred Stock and our Series D Preferred Stock was reduced from $350.00 to $150.00 per share.

On April 2, 2018, we closed an underwritten public offering of 57,143 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $87.50 per share. We received gross proceeds of approximately $5.0 million from the offering, before deducting underwriter discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us. Upon closing of the offering, we used $300,000 of the proceeds from the offering to redeem 46,875 shares of our Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series C Preferred Stock”) held by the Series D Investor, pursuant to another waiver agreement with the Series D Investor, dated March 28, 2018. As a result of such offering, the conversion price for each of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”), our Series C Preferred Stock and our Series D Preferred Stock was reduced to $87.50 per share.

On July 3, 2018, we closed an underwritten public offering of (i) 10,851,417 common units, with each common unit being comprised of one fiftieth share of our common stock, and one Series D Warrant to purchase one fiftieth share of common stock, (ii) 22,481,916 pre-funded units, with each pre-funded unit being comprised of one pre-funded warrant to purchase one fiftieth share of common stock and one Series D Warrant, and (iii) additional Series D Warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the underwriter’s option. We received net proceeds from the offering and the exercise of the underwriter’s option to purchase additional Series D Warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock of approximately $8.7 million, excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the Series D Warrants and the pre-funded warrants sold in the offering, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and payment of other estimated expenses associated with the offering that are payable by us. We used $2,264,269 of the net proceeds of the offering to redeem 306,917 shares of Series C Preferred Stock and 300 shares of Series D Preferred Stock held by the Series D Investor. As a result of such offering, the conversion price of the outstanding shares of the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock was further reduced to $15.00 per share, effective as of June 29, 2018.

On April 8, 2019, we closed an underwritten public offering. Each purchaseroffering of 486,957 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $5.00 per share. We received net proceeds of approximately $2.0 million from the offering, after deducting underwriter discounts and commissions and offering expenses payable by us. As a result of such offering, the conversion price for each of our Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred was reduced to $5.00 per share. In connection with this public offering, on April 12, 2019, the underwriter partially exercised its over-allotment option and purchased an additional 12,393 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $5.00 per share. We received net proceeds of approximately $47,000 from the exercise of the over-allotment option.

On September 24, 2019, we closed an underwritten public offering of (i) 539,000 common units, with each common unit being comprised of one share of our common stock and one Series E Warrant to purchase one share of common stock and (ii) 2,238,777 pre-funded units, with each pre-funded unit being comprised of one pre-funded warrant to purchase one share of common stock forand one Series E Warrant. In connection with this public offering, the underwriter partially exercised its over-allotment option and purchased an additional 194,444 Series E Warrants to purchase 194,444 shares of common stock. The offering price to the public was $1.80 per common unit and $1.79 per pre-funded unit. The net proceeds to us from the offering of common units and pre-funded units and the exercise of the underwriter’s option to purchase 194,444 additional Series E Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 194,444 shares of common stock was approximately $4.2 million, excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the Series E Warrants and the pre-funded warrants sold in the offering, and after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and payment of other estimated expenses associated with the offering that were payable by us.

On June 5, 2020, we closed an underwritten public offering of (i) 7,635,800 Units, with each Unit being comprised of one share of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and one Series F Warrant to purchase one share of common stock, that it purchasedand (ii) 14,586,400 Pre-Funded Units, with each Pre-Funded Unit being comprised of one Pre-Funded Warrant to purchase one share of common stock and one Series F Warrant. In connection with this public offering, the underwriter exercised the option practically in full, for 3,333,300 shares of common stock and 3,333,300 Series F Warrants. The offering price to the public was $0.45 per Unit and $0.449 per Pre-Funded Unit. Our net proceeds from the offering and the exercise of the underwriter’s over-allotment option were approximately $10.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and payment of other estimated expenses associated with the offering, but excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of Series F Warrants and the Pre-Funded Warrants sold in the offering. The warrants have a term of exercise of 5 years from the date of issuance and an exercise price of $137.50. This offering resulted in net proceeds to us of approximately $12.4 million after deducting placement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses.

 

On March 21, 2016,During the quarter ended September 30, 2020, we sold 76,004593,102 shares of our common stock and warrantspursuant to purchase 38,005 shares of our common stock in a public offering. Each purchaser received a warrant to purchase one half of one share of common stock for each share of common stock that it purchased in the offering. The warrants were exercisable immediately and have a term of exercise of 5 years from the date of issuance and an exercise price of $14.75. This offeringATM facility, which sales resulted in $268,000 and $158,000 of gross and net proceeds, respectively, for our company. We paid $9,000 in commissions to usA.G.P. in respect of approximately $1.1 million.those sales, as required under the Sales Agreement.

 

On March 21, 2016, we sold 41,323 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 20,663 shares of our common stock in a private placement. Each purchaser received a warrant to purchase one half of one share of common stock for each share of common stock that it purchased in the offering. The warrants were exercisable immediately and have a term of exercise of 5 years from the date of issuance and an exercise price of $14.75. This offering resulted in gross proceeds to us of approximately $0.6 million.Anti-Dilution Provisions

 

These offerings on March 21, 2016, resulted in net proceeds to us of approximately $1.4 million after deducting placement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses.

On July 7, 2016, we closed a public offering of 442,424Our outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Series A Warrants to purchase up to 1,769,696 shares of common stock. Each share of Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock andcontain anti-dilution provisions that may result in the accompanying Series A Warrants were sold at areduction of the conversion price thereof in the future. This feature may result in an indeterminate number of $33.00. Each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into 4 shares of common stock reflectingbeing issued upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock or the Series C Preferred Stock. Sales of additional shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock as a conversionresult of anti-dilution adjustments will dilute the interests of other security holders and may depress the price equalof our common stock. Accordingly, we may find it more difficult to $8.25 per share. The holdersraise additional equity capital while any of our Series B Preferred Stock or Series C Preferred Stock is outstanding. As of January 26, 2021, 17,303 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive cumulative dividends at the rate per shareand 2,343 shares of 15% per annum of the stated value for five years, payable in cash or common stock, at our discretion. The Series A Warrants are exercisable immediately and have a term of exercise of five years from the date of issuance and have an exercise price of $5.00 per share of common stock. The Series A Warrants commenced trading on the NYSE MKT under the ticker symbol “NSPR.WS” on August 1, 2016. We received gross proceeds of approximately $14.6 million from the offering, before deducting placement agent fees and offering expenses payable by us.C Preferred Stock were outstanding.

TwelveNine months ended December 31 , 2016September 30, 2020 compared to the twelvenine months ended December 31 , 2015September 30, 2019

 

General.At December 31 , 2016,September 30, 2020, we had cash and cash equivalents of $7,516,000,$10,882,000, as compared to $3,257,000$5,514,000 as of December 31, 2015.2019. We have historically met our cash needs through a combination of issuing new shares, borrowing activities and product sales. Our cash requirements are generally for research and development, marketing and sales activities, finance and administrative cost,costs, capital expenditures and general working capital.

 

NetFor the nine months ended September 30, 2020, net cash used in our operating activities of $7,495,000decreased by $1,361,000 to $6,881,000, from $8,242,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016same period in 2019. The primary reason for the decrease in cash used in our operating activities was primarily used for paymenta decrease of (i) $5,257,000$1,595,000 in payments for third party related expenses and for professional services (primarily due to a decrease in production related payments and (ii) $4,164,000 in salary payments. These expenditures were partially offset by $1,926,000a decrease in payments received from customers.

Net cash usedrelated to IDE application process), offset, in our operating activitiespart, by an increase of $11,596,000$223,000 in compensation costs paid during the twelvenine months ended December 31, 2015 was primarily used for payment of (i) $7,864,000 for third party related expenses and for professional services and (ii) $6,169,000September 30, 2020, from $4,378,000 in salary payments. These expenditures were partially offset by $2,437,000 in payments received from customers.

Cash provided by our investing activities was $70,000 during the twelvenine months ended December 31 , 2016, resulting primarily from the receipt of cash previously fundedSeptember 30, 2019 to employee retirement funds, compared to $23,000 of cash used$4,601,000 during the same period in 2015 primarily2020 and a decrease of $11,000 in payments received from customers, to $2,599,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, from $2,610,000 during the same period in 2019.

Cash used in our investing activities was $83,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 compared to $318,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. The primary reasons for the decrease in cash used by our investing activities were: a decrease of $205,000 in payments made for purchase of property, plant and equipment.

equipment to $26,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, from $231,000 during the same period in 2019, and a decrease of $30,000 in cash deposited to employee funds, to $57,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2020, from $87,000 during the same period in 2019.

Cash provided by financing activities for the twelvenine months ended December 31 , 2016September 30, 2020 was $11,703,000,$12,327,000, compared to $8,617,000$6,331,000 during the same period in 2015.2019. The principal sources of the cash provided by financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 were our June 2020 public offering of common stock, pre-funded warrants and warrants, the subsequent exercise of the pre-funded warrants sold in the offering, as well as exercise of warrants F and Unit Purchase Options as well as proceeds from an At-the-market offering that resulted in approximately $12,327,000 of aggregate net proceeds. The principal source of the cash provided by financing activities during the twelvenine months ended December 31, 2016,September 30, 2019, was the funds received from our July 2016September 2019 public offering of preferredcommon stock, pre-funded warrants and warrants, and from our March 2016 concurrent public and private offerings of common stock and warrants that resulted in approximately $14,368,000 of aggregate net proceeds, offset by loan repayments of $2,648,000 . The principal sourceas well as the subsequent exercise of the cash provided by financing activities duringpre-funded warrants sold in the twelve months ended December 31 , 2015 was the issuance of common stock and warrants in a public offering, that resulted in approximately $12,432,000$4,285,000 of aggregate net proceeds, offset by loan repaymentsand funds received from our April 2018 public offering of $3,702,000 and $113,000common stock that resulted in approximately $2,046,000 of payments made by us in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations associated with the vesting of restricted stock held by some of our employees.aggregate net proceeds.

 

As of December 31 , 2016,September 30, 2020, our current assets exceeded our current liabilities by a multiple of 1.8 .5.2. Current assets increased by $3,962,000$5,526,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016period and current liabilities decreased by $2,056,000$546,000 during the twelve months ended December 31 , 2016.period. As a result, our working capital surplus at December 31, 2016 increased by $6,018,000$6,072,000 to $3,816,000 from a working capital deficit$10,767,000 as of $2,202,000 at December 31, 2015.

September 30, 2020.

 

Twelve months ended December 31, 20152019 compared to the twelve months ended December 31, 20142018

 

General. At December 31, 2015,2019, we had cash and cash equivalents of $3.3 million,$5,514,000, as compared to $6.3 million$9,384,000 as of December 31, 2014.2018. We have historically met our cash needs through a combination of issuing new shares, borrowing activities and product sales. Our cash requirements are generally for research and development, marketing and sales activities, finance and administrative cost, capital expenditures and general working capital.

 

CashFor the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, net cash used in our operating activities increased by $2,204,000 to $9,810,000, from $7,606,000 during the same period in 2018. The primary reason for the increase in cash used in our operating activities was $11.6 millionan increase of payments for third party related expenses and for professional services of $1,571,000 (primarily due to production related payments, payments related to IDE application process and a settlement payment made to a former service provider pursuant to a settlement agreement), an increase of $717,000 in salary and bonus payments from $4,973,000 in the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and $19.4 million for2018 to $5,690,000 during the same period in 2014. The principal reasons for the usage of cash in our operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 were a net loss of $15.6 million, as well as2019, offset by an increase of $84,000 in working capital of $0.2 million, offset by $3.1 million in non-cash share - based compensation that was largely paidpayments received from customers to our directors, former chief executive officer and chief operating officer, $0.6 million of non-cash expenses related to the impairment of our royalty buyout option (discussed above), $0.3 million of non-cash financial expenses and $0.2 million of depreciation and amortization expenses. The principal reasons for the usage of cash in our operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 were a net loss of $25.1 million, offset by $4.1 million in non-cash share-based compensation that was largely paid to our directors and former chief executive officer, a decrease in working capital of $0.9 million, $0.4 million of non-cash financial expense and $0.3 million of depreciation and amortization expenses.

Cash used in our investing activities was $23,000$3,603,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, compared to $86,0002019, from $3,519,000 during the same period in 2014. The decrease in cash2018.

Cash used inby our investing activities resultedwas $387,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 compared to $44,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 resulting primarily from a decrease in purchases of property, plantrelated to upgrades made to our production facilities and equipment.our information technology infrastructure.

 

Cash provided by financing activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 20152019 was $8.6 million,$6,335,000 compared to $8.3 million$13,370,000 during the same period in 2014.2018. The principal source of the cash provided by financing activities during the twelve months ended December 31, 20152019, was the issuancefunds received from our September 2019 public offering of sharescommon stock, pre-funded warrants and warrants, as well as the subsequent exercise of the pre-funded warrants sold in athe offering, that resulted in approximately $4,289,000 of aggregate net proceeds, and funds received from our April 2019 public offering forof common stock that resulted in approximately $12.4 million after deducting placement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses, offset by loan repayments$2,046,000 of $3.7 million and $0.1 million of payments made by us in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations associated with the vesting of restricted stock held by some of our employees.aggregate net proceeds. The principal source of the cash provided by financing activities during the twelve months ended December 31, 20142018, was the issuance of shares in a registered direct offering of $7.4 million and funds received from our July 2018 public offering of common stock, pre-funded warrants and warrants, as well as the issuancesubsequent exercise of at-the-market sharesthe pre-funded warrants sold in the offering, that resulted in approximately $8,885,000 of $2.2 million,aggregate net proceeds, funds received from our April 2018 public offering of common stock that resulted in approximately $4,439,000 of aggregate net proceeds. and the funds received from our March 2018 public offering of common stock that resulted in approximately $3,060,000 of aggregate net proceeds, offset by a redemption of Series C and Series D Preferred Stock from the repaymentproceeds of a loanthe offering in an aggregate amount of $1.2 million.$3,014,000.

 

As of December 31, 2015,2019, our current liabilitiesassets exceeded our current assetsliabilities by a multiple of 1.5.2.5. Current assets decreased by $4.7 million$3,609,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015period and current liabilities decreasedincreased by $1.6 million$195,000 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015.period. As a result, our working capital surplus decreased by $3.1 million$3,804,000 to a working capital deficit$4,695,000 as of $2.3 million at December 31, 2015.2019.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We have no off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements, obligations (including contingent obligations), or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons that have, or may have, a material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In April, 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASU No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” The new guidance requires debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt liability, consistent with the presentation of a debt discount. The new guidance does not affect the recognition and measurement of debt issuance costs. The new guidance became effective during the first quarter ofJune 2016, and was applied on a retrospective basis.

As of December 31 , 2016 and December 31, 2015, $35,000 and $85,000, respectively were deducted from the carrying value of the “Current maturity of loan” in the consolidated balance sheets.

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, Revenue from contracts with customers. The objectiveASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326)-Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This guidance replaces the current incurred loss impairment methodology. Under the new guidance, on initial recognition and at each reporting period, an entity is required to recognize an allowance that reflects its current estimate of credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the new revenue standard is to provide a single, comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers to improve comparability within industries, across industries, and across capital markets. The revenue standard contains principles that an entity will apply to determine the measurement of revenue and timing of when it is recognized. The underlying principle is that an entity will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at an amount that the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services,financial instrument based on a five step model that includes the identification of the contract with the customerhistorical experience, current conditions and the performance obligations in the contract, determination of the transaction price, allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contractreasonable and recognizing revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The revenue standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017. We believe that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

On July 22, 2015,supportable forecasts. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory,” which requires that inventory within the scope of the guidance be measured at the lower of cost2019-10, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and net realizable value. Inventory measured using last-in, first-outHedging (Topic 815), and the retail inventory method are not impacted by the new guidance.Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates (“ASU 2019-10”). The new guidance will be effective for public business entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 , including interim periods within those years. Prospective application is required. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. We believe that the adoptionpurpose of this standardamendment is to create a two tier rollout of major updates, staggering the effective dates between larger public companies and all other entities. This granted certain classes of companies, including Smaller Reporting Companies (“SRCs”), additional time to implement major FASB standards, including ASU 2016-13. Larger public companies will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 – Improvements to Employee Share Based Payment Accounting which simplifies certain aspects of the accounting for share-based payments, including accounting for income taxes, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, classification on the statement of cash flows as well as allowing an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest or account for forfeitures as they occur. This ASU is effective date for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016,2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. EarlyAll other entities are permitted to defer adoption of ASU 2016-13, and its related amendments, until the earlier of fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2022. Under the current SEC definitions, we meet the definition of an SRC as of the ASU 2019-10 issuance date and is permitted in any annual or interimadopting the deferral period for which financial statements have not yet been issued, and all amendments in the ASU that apply must be adopted in the same period. We adopted the update during the quarter ended December 31, 2016, and have retroactively applied the2016-13. The guidance effective as of January 1, 2016.  We elected to account for forfeitures as they occur rather than estimate expected forfeitures which resulted inrequires a modified retrospective transition approach through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the current period of $457,000. Certain amounts or ratios for 2016 interim periods have been restated to reflect the adoption of this new guidance. Adoption of this update does not affect our total equity or book value per share.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016- 18 , “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Restricted Cash”. The new guidance requires that the reconciliation of the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown in the statement of cash flows include restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. If restricted cash is presented separately from cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet , companies will be required to reconcile the amounts presented on the statement of cash flows to the amounts on the balance sheet. Companies will also need to disclose information about the nature of the restrictions. The guidance is effective for annual an interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15 “Statement of Cash Flows Topic 230: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” ASU No. 2016-15 issued guidance to clarify how certain cash receipts and cash payments should be presented in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2014-15 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2016 and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. The new standard is effective for annual periods and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and upon adoption, an entity should apply the amendments by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. Early adoption is not permitted except for the provision to record fair value changes for financial liabilities under the fair value option resulting from instrument-specific credit risk in other comprehensive income.adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In February 2016, the FASB issuedadoption of ASU 2016-02, Leases, which requires to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The accounting standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements, but does not believe that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on ourits consolidated financial statements.

 

Factors That May Affect Future Operations

 

We believe that our future operating results will continue to be subject to quarterly variations based upon a wide variety of factors, including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, cyclical nature of the ordering patterns of our distributors, timing of regulatory approvals, the implementation of various phases of our clinical trials and manufacturing efficiencies due to the learning curve of utilizing new materials and equipment. Our operating results could also be impacted by a weakening of the Euro and strengthening of the New Israeli Shekel, or NIS, both against the U.S. dollar. Lastly, other economic conditions we cannot foresee may affect customer demand, such as individual country reimbursement policies pertaining to our products. For a discussion of these and other risks that relate to our business, you should carefully review the risks and uncertainties described under the heading “Part II – Item 1A. Risk Factors”.

The ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s operations remains undetermined and will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence at this time, including the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic, new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, and any additional preventative and protective actions that regulators, or the board or management of the Company, may determine are needed.

BUSINESS

 

Overview

 

We are a medical device company focusing on the development and commercialization of our proprietary MicroNetMicroNet™ stent platform technology for the treatment of complex vascular and coronary disease. A stent is an expandable “scaffold-like” device, usually constructed of a metallic material, that is inserted into an artery to expand the inside passage and improve blood flow. Our MicroNet, a micron mesh sleeve, is wrapped over a stent to provide embolic protection in stenting procedures.

Our CGuard™ carotid embolic prevention system (“CGuard EPSEPS”) combines MicroNet and a self-expandable nitinol stent in a single device for use in carotid artery applications. Our CGuard EPS received CE mark approval in the European Union in March 2013 and wewas fully launched its release on a limited basis in October 2014. In January 2015, a new version of CGuard, with a rapid exchange delivery system, received CE mark approval in Europe and in September 2015, we announced the full market launch of CGuard EPS in Europe.2015. Subsequently, we launched CGuard EPS in ArgentinaRussia and Colombia,certain countries in Latin America and have received regulatory approval to commercializeAsia, including India. In September, 2020, we launched CGuard EPS in Russia. IfBrazil after receiving regulatory approval in July 2020, and we receive sufficient proceedsare seeking strategic partners for a potential launch of CGuard EPS in Japan and China.

In April 2017, we had a pre-IDE submission meeting with the FDA regarding CGuard EPS where we presented materials that we believed would support a formal IDE submission seeking approval to conduct a human clinical trial in the United States which included our draft synopsis for the clinical trial design. The FDA agreed to our pre-clinical test plan and clinical trial design. On July 26, 2019, we submitted an IDE application for CGuard EPS. In connection with such application, on August 23, 2019, we received a request for additional information from the exerciseFDA in support of our application.

On September 8, 2020, we received approval from the FDA of our Investigation Device Exemption (“IDE”), thereby allowing us to proceed with a pivotal study of our CGuard™ Carotid Stent System, CARENET-III, for prevention of stroke in patients in the United States. CARENET-lll is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, pivotal study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Series C Warrants, we planCGuard™ Carotid Stent System when used to develop CGuard EPS withtreat symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting. The trial will enroll approximately 315 subjects in a smaller delivery catheter (5 French gauge)maximum of 40 study sites located in the United States. Additional sites in Europe may also participate in the study, contributing a maximum of ~50% of the total enrollees. The primary endpoint of the study will be the composite of the following: incidence of the following major adverse events: death (all- cause mortality), whichall stroke, and myocardial infarction (DSMI) through 30-days post-index procedure, based on the clinical events committee (CEC) adjudication or ipsilateral stroke from 31-365 day follow-up, based on Clinical Events Committee (CEC) adjudication.

Additionally, we intend to submitcontinue to invest in current and future potential product and manufacturing enhancements for CE mark approval within three calendar quarters of receiving such proceeds. We believe that CGuard EPS that are expected to reduce cost of goods and/or provide the best-in-class performing delivery system. In furtherance of our strategy that focuses on establishing CGuard EPS as a viable alternative to vascular surgery, we are exploring adding new delivery systems and accessory solutions for procedural protection to our portfolio.

We consider the addressable market for our CGuard EPS to be individuals with a smaller delivery catheter will enable usdiagnosed, symptomatic high-grade carotid artery stenosis (HGCS, ≥70% occlusion) for whom intervention is preferable to meetmedical (drug) therapy. This group includes not only carotid artery stenting patients but also individuals undergoing carotid endarterectomy, as the market demandtwo approaches compete for minimally invasive devices, have a competitive advantage in penetrating the Asia Pacific market and offer our product for transradial catheterization, which, we believe, is gaining favor among interventionalists. We cannot give any assurance that we will receive sufficient (or any) proceeds from the exercisesame patient population. Assuming full penetration of the Series C Warrants or the timing of receipt of such proceeds, if ever. We cannot predict when or if the Series C Warrants will be exercised. It is possibleintervention caseload by CGuard EPS, we estimate that the Series C Warrants may expireaddressable market for CGuard EPS was approximately $1.0 billion in 2017 (source: Health Research International 2017 Results of Update Report on Global Carotid Stenting Procedures and may never be exercised.Markets by Major Geography and Addressable Markets).

 

Our MGuard™ Prime™ embolic protection system (“MGuard Prime EPSEPS”) is marketed for use in patients with acute coronary syndromes, notably acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) and saphenous vein graft coronary interventions (bypass surgery). MGuard Prime EPS combines MicroNet with a bare-metal cobalt-chromium based stent and, together with our first generation MGuard stent combining MicroNet with a bare-metal stainless steel stent, unless otherwise indicated, we refer to both kinds of bare-metal stents as our MGuard coronary products. We market and sell MGuard Prime EPS for the treatment of coronary disease in the European Union.stent. MGuard Prime EPS received CE mark approval in the European Union in October 2010 for improving luminal diameter and providing embolic protection. However, as a result of a shift in industry preferences away from bare-metal stents in favor of drug-eluting (drug-coated) stents, in 2014 we decided to curtail further development of this product in order to focus on the development of a drug-eluting stent product, MGuard DES.DES™. Due to limited resources, though,however, our efforts have been limited to testing drug-eluting stents manufactured by potential partners for compatibility with MicroNet and seeking to incorporate MicroNet onto a drug-eluting stent manufactured by a potential partner.

We The FDA has clarified that the primary mode of action for drug-eluting cardiovascular stents, which are also developing a neurovascular flow diverter, NGuard, whichregulated as combination products, is an endovascularthat of the device that directs blood flow away from cerebral aneurysms in ordercomponent and has assigned the FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) primary responsibility for premarket review and regulation, providing some clarity about what to ultimately sealexpect regarding the aneurysms. Our flow diverter would utilize an open cell, highly flexible metal scaffoldregulatory framework related to which MicroNet would be attached. We have completed initial pre-clinical testing of this product in both simulated bench models and standard in vivo pre-clinical models. However, as we plan to focus our resources on the further expansion of our sales and marketing activities for CGuard EPS and MGuard Prime EPS and, provided that we have sufficient resources, the development of CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter (5 French gauge) and its submission for CE mark approval, we do not intend to resume further development of NGuard until at least the third quarter of 2018.MGuard DES™.

 

We also intend to develop a pipeline of other products and additional applications by leveraging our MicroNet technology to new applications to improve peripheral vascular and neurovascular procedures, such as the treatment of the superficial femoral artery disease, vascular disease below the knee and neurovascular stenting to open diseased vesselsseal aneurysms in the brain.

Presently, none of our products may be sold or marketed in the United States.

During

Our Industry

Carotid

Carotid arteries are located on each side of the neck and provide the primary blood supply to the brain. Carotid artery disease, also called carotid artery stenosis, is a type of atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries) that is one of the major risk factors for ischemic stroke. In carotid artery disease, plaque accumulates in the artery walls, narrowing the artery and disrupting the blood supply to the brain. This disruption in blood supply, together with plaque debris breaking off the artery walls and traveling to the brain, are the primary causes of stroke. According to the World Health Organization (https://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/resources/atlas/en/) every year, 15 million people worldwide suffer a stroke, and nearly six million die and another five million are left permanently disabled. According to the same source, stroke is the second leading cause of disability, after dementia.

In 2017, 2.2 million people were diagnosed with carotid artery disease, of which, approximately 600,000 patients had high grade carotid stenosis requiring intervention for carotid artery disease (2017 Health Research International Market Report). Carotid artery stenting is a minimally invasive treatment option for carotid artery disease and an alternative to carotid endarterectomy, where a surgeon accesses the blocked carotid artery though an incision in the neck, and then surgically removes the plaque. Endovascular techniques using stents and carotid embolic prevention system protect against plaque and debris traveling downstream, blocking off the vessel and disrupting blood flow. We believe that the use of a stent with an embolic protection system should increase the number of patients being treated since it would avoid the need for complex surgery.

Coronary

Physicians and patients may select from a variety of treatments to address coronary artery disease, including pharmaceutical therapy, balloon angioplasty, stenting with bare metal or drug-eluting stents, and coronary artery bypass graft procedures, with the selection often depending upon the stage of the disease.

The global market for coronary stents is estimated at $5.5 billion and projected to grow to $8 billion by 2025. (Global Market Insights, Inc. Nov 06, 2019). Growth will be driven by a continued increases in incidence (Coronary heart disease burden is projected to rise from around 47 million DALYs globally in 1990 to 82 million DALYs (Disability Adjusted Life Year)in 2020 – WHO Global Burden of Coronary Heart Disease) – especially in developing countries). However, this market is dominated by drug eluting stents (DES) which limits the opportunity for MGuard.

Neurovascular

The neurovascular market focuses on catheter-delivered products used to treat strokes that already happened or unruptured brain aneurysms that could lead to strokes. In the latter case, coils are wound into blood vessel bulges to block blood flow entering the aneurysms to prevent the aneurysms from rupturing. Endovascular treatment of arterial aneurysm has evolved substantially over the past two decades, transitioning from an investigational therapy into routine clinical practice and ultimately emerging as the treatment of choice for many lesions (source: Medtech Ventures 2009, Aneurysm Flow Modulating Device Market). We believe that the market for aneurysm flow modulating devices is still in the embryonic stage with windows of opportunities for early entrance.

The neurovascular market includes over-the-wire, flow-guided microcatheters, guiding catheters, coil and liquid embolics, neurovascular stents and flow diversion stents. According to iData Research, the market is expected to be driven by the conversion from surgical procedures to endovascular techniques in the treatment of aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations.

Peripheral

Peripheral vascular diseases (“PVD”) are caused by the formation of atherosclerotic plaques in arteries, which carry blood to organs, limbs and head. It is also known as peripheral artery occlusive disease or peripheral artery disease. It comprises diseases pertaining to both peripheral veins and peripheral arteries, affecting the peripheral and cardiac circulation in the body. PVD includes diseases outside of the heart and brain, but most times refers to the leg and foot.

Peripheral stents are more often used in combination with balloon angioplasty to open the veins, so that blood can flow through the blocked veins in the body.

The growing prevalence of PVD is expected to cause increased demand for treatment options. PVD is age related and its prevalence increases markedly with advancing age. In addition PVD is more prevalent in lower and medium income countries than in higher income countries (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(19)30255-4)

Our Products

Below is a summary of our current products and products under development, and their intended applications.

MicroNet

MicroNet is our proprietary circular knitted mesh which wraps around a stent to protect patients from plaque debris flowing downstream upon deployment. MicroNet is made of a single fiber from a biocompatible polymer widely used in medical implantations. The size, or aperture, of the current MicroNet ‘pore’ is only 150-180 microns in order to maximize protection against the potentially dangerous plaque and thrombus.

CGuard – Carotid Applications

Our CGuard EPS combines our MicroNet mesh and a self-expandable nitinol stent (a stent that expands without balloon dilation pressure or need of an inflation balloon) in a single device for use in carotid artery applications. MicroNet is placed over and attached to an open cell nitinol metal stent platform which is designed to trap debris and emboli that can dislodge from the diseased carotid artery and potentially travel to the brain and cause a stroke. This danger is one of the greatest limitations of carotid artery stenting with conventional carotid stents and stenting methods. The CGuard EPS technology is a highly flexible stent system that conforms to the carotid anatomy.

We believe that our CGuard EPS design provides advantages over existing therapies in treating carotid artery stenosis, such as conventional carotid stenting and surgical endarterectomy, given the superior embolic protection characteristics provided by the MicroNet. We believe the MicroNet will provide acute embolic protection at the time of the procedure, but more importantly, we believe that CGuard EPS will provide post-procedure protection against embolic dislodgement, which can occur up to 48 hours post-procedure. It is in this post-procedure time frame that embolization is the source of post-procedural strokes in the brain. Schofer, et al. (“Late cerebral embolization after emboli-protected carotid artery stenting assessed by sequential diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging,” Journal of American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Interventions, Volume 1, 2008) have shown that the majority of the incidents of embolic showers associated with carotid stenting occur post-procedure.

Our CGuard EPS with over-the-wire delivery system received CE mark approval in the European Union in March 2013. In October 2014, we initiated a limited market release of CGuard EPS with over-the-wire delivery system for use in carotid artery applications in Germany, Poland and Italy.

In September 2014, we reported the results of the CGuard CARENET trial at the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (“TCT”) conference in Washington D.C. In the CARENET trial, the CGuard EPS system demonstrated better results over historical data using conventional commercially available carotid stents. In the third quarter of 2015 the results of the CGuard CARENET trial were published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. In November 2015, positive twelve-month follow-up data from the CGuard CARENET trial was presented at the 42nd Annual Symposium on Vascular and Endovascular Issues, documenting the benefits of the CGuard MicroNet technology as well as the patency benefits (maintaining the artery open) of the internal and external carotid arteries at twelve months.

In the first quarter of 2015, we implementedintroduced CGuard RX, the new rapid exchange delivery system for CGuard EPS. The rapid exchange delivery system has a guidewire that passes through the delivery system, running through the guiding catheter. It has one port, and thus, can be operated by one operator, while an over-the-wire-delivery system has two lumens and ports and requires two operators to perform the procedure. Our rapid exchange delivery system received CE mark approval in January 2015. We launched our CGuard EPS in Europe with the rapid exchange delivery system in multiple medical specialties that perform carotid artery stenting. These customers include interventional cardiologists, vascular surgeons, interventional neuroradiologists and interventional radiologists.

In September 2015, we announced full market launch of CGuard EPS in Europe. Subsequently, we launched CGuard EPS in Russia and certain countries in Latin America and Asia, including India. In September, 2020, we launched CGuard EPS in Brazil after receiving regulatory approval in July 2020, and we are seeking strategic partners for a potential launch of CGuard EPS in Japan and China.

In April 2017, we had a pre-IDE submission meeting with the FDA regarding CGuard EPS where we presented materials that we believed would support a formal IDE submission seeking approval to conduct a human clinical trial in the United States which included our draft synopsis for the clinical trial design. The FDA agreed to our pre-clinical test plan and clinical trial design. On July 26, 2019, we submitted an IDE application for CGuard EPS. In connection with such application, on August 23, 2019, we received a request for additional information from the FDA in support of our application. On September 8, 2020, we received IDE approval for CGuard™ Carotid Stent System, CARENET-III.

Additionally, we intend to continue to evaluate potential product enhancements and manufacturing enhancements for CGuard EPS expected to reduce cost reduction/focused spending plan. Theof goods and/or provide the best-in-class performing delivery system. We cannot give any assurance that we will receive sufficient (or any) proceeds from future financings or the timing of such financings, if ever for potential product enhancements and manufacturing enhancements. In addition, such additional financings may be costly or difficult to complete. Even if we receive sufficient proceeds from future financings, there is no assurance that we will be able to timely apply for CE mark approval following our receipt of such proceeds. We believe these improvements may allow us to reduce cost of goods and increase penetration in our existing geographies and better position us for entry into new markets.

MGuard Products– Coronary Applications

Bare-Metal Stent MGuard Product. Our MGuard Prime EPS coronary product is comprised of MicroNet wrapped around a cobalt-chromium based bare-metal stent. In comparison to a conventional bare-metal stent, we believe our MGuard Prime EPS coronary product with MicroNet mesh provides protection from dangerous embolic showers in patients experiencing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, the most severe form of a heart attack, referred to as STEMI. Standard stents were not engineered for heart attack patients. Rather, they were designed for treating stable angina patients whose occlusion is different from that of an occlusion in a heart attack patient. In acute heart attack patients, the plaque or thrombus is unstable and often breaks up as the stent is implanted causing downstream blockages in a significant portion of heart attack patients. Our MGuard Prime EPS is integrated with a precisely engineered micro net mesh that is designed to prevent the unstable arterial plaque and thrombus that caused the heart attack blockage from breaking off.

NGuard — Neurovascular Applications

We began developing a neurovascular flow diverter, which we refer to as NGuard, which is an endovascular device that diverts blood flow away from cerebral aneurysms and ultimately seals the aneurysms. We have tested early flow diverter prototypes in initial pre-clinical testing in both simulated aneurysm bench models using various MicroNet configurations with varying aperture sizes, as well as in standard in vivo pre-clinical models, in which we observed aneurysm sealing and also wide open side branch vessels across which the device was placed. We have suspended all further development activity of NGuard until we obtain sufficient funding for such purpose.

PVGuard — Peripheral Vascular Applications

We intend to develop our MicroNet mesh sleeve and a self-expandable stent for use in peripheral vascular applications, to which we refer to as PVGuard. PVDs are usually characterized by the accumulation of plaque in arteries in the legs. This accumulation can lead to the need for amputation or even death, when untreated. PVD is treated either by trying to clear the artery of the blockage, or by implanting a stent in the affected area to push the blockage out of the way of normal blood flow.

As in carotid procedures, peripheral procedures are characterized by the necessity of controlling embolic showers both during and post-procedure. Controlling embolic showers is so important in these indications that physicians often use fully covered stents, at the risk of blocking branching vessels, to ensure that emboli do not fall into the bloodstream and move to the brain. We believe that our MicroNet design will provide substantial advantages over existing therapies in treating peripheral artery stenosis.

However, as we plan had four components: (i) reducing headcount; (ii) limitingto focus our resources on the focusfurther expansion of clinical and development expenses to only carotid and neurovascular products; (iii) limitingour sales and marketing expensesactivities for CGuard EPS and, provided that we have sufficient resources, potential product enhancements and manufacturing enhancements for CGuard EPS expected to those relatedreduce cost of goods and/or provide the best-in-class performing delivery system and its submission for CE mark approval, we do not intend to pursue the development of PVGuard in the near future.

Completed Clinical Trials for CGuard EPS

CARENET

The CARENET trial was the first multi-center study of CGuard EPS following the receipt of CE mark of this device in March 2013. The CARENET trial was designed to evaluate feasibility and safety of CGuard EPS in treatment of carotid lesions in consecutive patients suitable for coronary artery stenting (“CAS”) in a multi-operator, real-life setting. The acute, 30 day, magnetic resonance imaging (“MRI”), ultrasound and six month clinical event results were presented at the LINC conference in Leipzig, Germany in February, 2015. In the third quarter of 2015, the results of the CGuard CARENET trial were published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. In November 2015, positive twelve month follow-up data from the CGuard CARENET trial was presented at the 42nd Annual Symposium on Vascular and Endovascular Issues, documenting the benefits of the CGuard MicroNet technology as well as the patency benefits (maintaining the artery open) of the internal and external carotid arteries at twelve months.

MACCE (myocardial infarction (“MI”), stroke or death) rate was 0.0% at 30 days. At six months, there was one death, which was not device or procedure-related but did result in a MACCE rate of 3.6% at six months. At twelve months there were two additional deaths, which were not device or procedure-related resulting in a MACCE rate of 10.7% at one year.

30 days (n=30)6 months (n=28)12 months (n=28)
MACCE (MI, stroke, death)(0) 0.0%(1) 3.6%(3) 10.7%
MI(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%
stroke(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%
death(0) 0.0%(1) 3.6%(3) 10.7%

CAS carries the risk of cerebral embolization during and following the procedure, leading to life-threatening complications, mainly cerebral ischemic events. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is a sensitive tool used to identify cerebral emboli during CAS by measuring “lesions” within the brain which are areas that are ischemic and do not receive oxygenated blood due to cerebral emboli. In the CARENET trial, 37.0% of patients treated with CGuard EPS had new ischemic lesions at 48 hours after the procedure, with an average volume of 0.039 cm3. Of these lesions, there was only one that remained at 30 days following the procedure and all others had resolved. Complete details appear in the following table. Where there is a second number shown below after a ± symbol, it indicates the potential error in the measurement.

  

48 hours

n=27

  

30 days

n=26

 
Subjects with new Acute Ischemic Lesions (“AIL”)  10   1 
Incidence of new lesions  37.0%  4.0%
Total number new AIL  83   1 
Avg. number new AIL per patient  3.19 ± 10.33   0.04 ± 0.20 
Average lesion volume (cm3)  0.039 ± 0.08   0.08 ± 0.00 
Maximum lesion volume (cm3)  0.445   0.116 
Permanent AIL at 30 days     1 

The healing process of the tissue and in-stent restenosis can be measured by a non-invasive form of ultrasound called duplex ultrasound. This type of ultrasound measures the velocity of the blood that flows within the carotid arteries, which increases exponentially as the lumen of the internal carotid artery narrows and the percent stenosis increases. One of the measurements is called PSV (peak systolic volume) and is known to be highly correlated to the degree of in-stent restenosis; PSV values higher than 300 cm/sec are indicative of >70% stenosis, while PSV values lower than 104 cm/sec are indicative of <30% restenosis and healthy healing. In the CARENET trial, duplex ultrasound measurements done at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months following the stenting procedure all attest to healthy normal healing without restenosis concerns, as the PSV values were 60.96 cm/sec ± 22.31, 85.24 cm/sec ± 39.56, and 90.22 cm/sec ± 37.72 respectively. The internal carotid artery was patent in all patients (100%).

The conclusions of the CARENET trial were:

The CARENET trial demonstrated safety of the CGuard EPS stent, with a 30 day MACCE rate of 0%.
Incidence of new ipsilateral lesions (percent of patients with new lesions on the ipsilateral side (same side where the stent was employed)) at 48 hours was reduced by almost half compared to published data, and volume was reduced almost tenfold.
All but one lesion had resolved completely by 30 days.
Twelve month data showed no stroke or stroke-related deaths, and no cardiac adverse events.
CGuard EPS offers enhanced benefits for patients undergoing CAS with unprecedented safety.

Physician-Sponsored Clinical Trials for CGuard—PARADIGM-101 Study

PARADIGM-101 (Prospective evaluation of All-comer peRcutaneous cArotiD revascularization In symptomatic and increased-risk asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, using CGuard™ Mesh-covered embolic prevention stent system-101) was an investigator-led, single center study with the objective of evaluating feasibility and outcome of routine use of CGuard EPS in 101 consecutive unselected all-comer patients referred for carotid revascularization, initiated in 2015. In May 2016, the 30-day results were presented at the EuroPCR 2016 Late-Breaking Clinical Trial Session in Paris, and in the Journal of EuroIntervention.

Key findings from the PARADIGM-101 study and the follow-up data are as follows:

CGuard EPS delivery success was 99.1%. The clinical evaluation also found no device foreshortening or elongation;
Angiographic diameter stenosis or vessel narrowing was reduced from 83±9% to only 6.7±5% (p<0.001);
Periprocedural death/major stroke/ myocardial infarction (“MI”) rates were 0%;
One event was adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee as a minor stroke (0.9%), with no change in NIH Stroke Scale or modified Ranking scale;

The results of the PARADIGM-101 study demonstrated that CGuard EPS can safely be used in a high risk, all-comer population of patients with carotid artery stenosis and indicated that routine use of CGuard EPS may prevent cerebral events, such as strokes, by holding plaque against the vessel wall, preventing emboli from being released into the blood stream. The PARADIGM-101 study found that CGuard EPS is applicable in up to 90% of all-comer patients with carotid stenosis.

Clinical Results and Mechanical Properties of the Carotid CGUARD Double-Layered Embolic Prevention Stent Study

“Clinical Results and Mechanical Properties of the Carotid CGUARD Double-Layered Embolic Prevention Stent Study” was an investigator-led, prospective single-center study which evaluated CGuard EPS in 30 consecutive patients with internal carotid artery stenosis disease with the objective of reporting early clinical outcomes with a novel MicroNet covered stent for the internal carotid artery and the in vitro investigation of the device’s mechanical properties. In October 2016, the 30-day positive results were published online-ahead-of-print in the Journal of Endovascular Therapy.

Key findings from the study are as follows:

100% success in implanting CGuard EPS without residual stenosis;
No peri- or post-procedural complications;
No deaths, major adverse events, minor or major strokes, or new neurologic symptoms during the six months following the procedure;
Modified Rankin Scale improved for the symptomatic patients from 1.56 prior to the procedure to 0 afterwards;
All vessels treated with CGuard EPS remained patent (open) at six months; and
DW-MRI performed in 19 of 30 patients found no new ipsilateral lesions after 30 days and after six months compared with the baseline DW-MRI studies.

Additionally, based on engineering evaluations, the study concluded that CGuard EPS provides a high radial force and strong support in stenotic lesions. The stent is easy to use and safe to implant because it does not foreshorten and its structure adapts well to changes in diameter and direction of tortuous vascular anatomies. The MicroNet mesh of CGuard did not cause any changes to specific mechanical parameters of the underlying stent.

CGUARD Mesh-Covered Stent in Real World: The IRON-Guard Registry

“CGUARD Mesh-Covered Stent in Real World: The IRON-Guard Registry using CGuard EPS” was a physician initiated prospective multi-center registry that included 200 patients from 12 medical centers in Italy. The objective of the study was to report 30-day outcomes (including MACCE) in a prospective series of patients who were treated with CGuard EPS between April 2015 and June 2016. In January 2017, 30-day results were presented at the Leipzig Interventional Course (LINC) 2017 and published in the Journal of EuroIntervention in May 2017. The 12 month follow-up was published in the Journal of EuroIntevention in October 2018.

Key 30-day results presented were:

100% success in implanting CGuard EPS;
No MI, major stroke or death at 30 days;
There were two transient ischemic attacks and five periprocedural minor strokes, including one thrombosis solved by surgery.
Total elimination of post-procedural neurologic complications by 30 days;
DW-MRI performed pre-procedure and between 24 and 72 hours post-procedure in 61 patients, indicated that 12 patients had new micro emboli (19%).
At 12 months, there were no new major neurological adverse events, thrombosis or external carotid occlusion recorded;
One myocardial infarction occurred at 12 months.

Peri-procedural brain lesions prevention in CAS (3PCAS): Randomized trial comparing CGuard stent vs. WallStent™ Study

3PCAS study was an independent investigator-led single center randomized clinical trial, comparing CGuard EPS vs. WallStent™, intended to evaluate the incidence of peri-procedural diffusion-weighted-magnetic-resonance-imaging (DW-MRI) new brain lesions after carotid artery stenting. Sixty-one consecutive patients referred for carotid revascularization (between January 2015 and October 2016) were eligible for the study. The results of the 3PCAS study was published in the International Journal of Cardiology in September 2018. The discussion distinguished between peri-procedural (from procedure to 48h -72h) and post-procedural periods (72h to 30 days) where the CGuard EPS demonstrated a reduction in the post-procedural embolic effect during the carotid plaque healing period. In contrast, there was no difference between the two stent launch;groups during the peri-procedural stage because of, according to the published article, the presence of bilateral/contralateral lesions (lesions resulting from the contralateral artery from the non-treated carotid) which suggest that the peri-procedural neurological damage may have originated from extra-carotid sources (outside of the artery which was treated and (iv) reducing all other expenses (including conferences, travel, promotional expenses, executive cash salaries, director cash fees, rent, etc.)outside the stent itself). In addition, we decided to alter our commercial strategy by using third party distributors to drive future sales, as opposed to direct sales to hospitals and clinics, which had previously been our focus. However, we have decided to shift our commercial strategy to focus on sales of our products through local distribution partners and our own internal sales initiatives. We have begun to participate in international trade shows and industry conferences in an attempt to gain market exposure and brand recognition.

 

 48

Initial Clinical Study of the New CGuard EPS MicroNet Covered Carotid Stent: “One Size Fits All”

“Initial Clinical Study of the New CGuard EPS MicroNet Covered Carotid Stent: ‘One Size Fits All’” was an investigator-led, single-center study, which evaluated CGuard EPS in 30 consecutive patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery with the objective of evaluating the CGuard EPS MicroNet covered stent for its ability to adjust to different vessel diameters. The results of the study were published in the Journal of Endovascular Therapy in May 2019. The conclusion of the study as reported was that CGuard EPS has high conformability combined with an almost equivalent outward radial force at expansion diameters ranging from 5.5 to 9.0 mm. The first clinical results demonstrate the “One Size Fits All” stent can be implanted in internal carotid arteries with reference diameters within this range.

Key findings from the study were as follows:

 100% technical success in implanting CGuard EPS;
 
No neurological events within 30 days;
The chronic outward force normalized by stent length demonstrated a near-equivalent radial force outcome; and
The stent displayed only a minor difference between the minimal radial force at 9.0 mm (0.195 N/mm) and the maximal radial force at 5.5 mm (0.330 N/mm).

 

Recent DevelopmentsPreliminary Results from a Prospective Real-World Multicenter Clinical Practice of Carotid Artery Stenting Using the CGuard Embolic Prevention System: The IRONGUARD 2 Study

 

On July 7, 2016,“Preliminary Results From a Prospective Real-World Multicenter Clinical Practice of Carotid Artery Stenting Using the CGuard Embolic Prevention System: The IRONGUARD 2 Study” is a physician initiated prospective multi-center registry enrolling 733 patients from 20 medical centers in Italy, from January 2017 to June 2019. The objective of the study is to evaluate periprocedural (24 hours), post-procedural (up to 30 days), and 12-month outcomes in a largest, prospective, multicenter series of patients submitted for protected carotid artery stenting with the CGuard Embolic Prevention System. The 24-hour, 30-day and 12-month preliminary results (data available on 726 patients out of the 733 treated) were presented at the Leipzig Interventional Course (LINC) in January 2021. The study’s preliminary results from the IRONGUAURD 2 study suggested in a real-world evaluation of carotid artery stenting, Cguard EPS can be safely used for treatment of extracranial carotid artery stenosis, allowing a low rate of of post procedural adverse events by 12 months.

Key findings from the study are as follows:

100%% procedural success in implanting CGuard EPS;

1 death from hemorrhagic stroke (patient was admitted for immediate treatment of CAS due to stroke), 2 minor strokes, 6 TIAs and one nonfatal AMI at 24 hours;

1 minor stroke, 2 TIAs, three AMIs, no deaths and no stent thrombosis/occlusions between 24 hours and 30 days; and
1 minor stroke, 4 TIAs, 2 AMIs and 8 deaths ( the 2 mentioned AMIs, 4 malignancies, 1 suicide and 1 undefined complication in Guillain-Barré Syndrome) between 30 days and 1 year.

The SIBERIA Trial for Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Conventional Versus Micronet™-Covered Stent Use in Percutaneous Neuroprotected Carotid Artery Revascularization: Peri-procedural and 30-day Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Outcomes

“The SIBERIA Trial for Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Conventional Versus Micronet™-Covered Stent Use in Percutaneous Neuroprotected Carotid Artery Revascularization: Peri-procedural and 30-day Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Outcomes” was an investigator-initiated randomized clinical trial, single-center study, which evaluated one hundred patients who qualified for carotid revascularization with high risk for surgery and were randomized 1:1 to either CGuard EPS or AcculinkTM. The primary endpoints were incidence and volume of new cerebral embolic post-procedural lesions (24-48 hours) as determined by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). The principal secondary endpoints included incidence of periprocedural or postprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction and death at 30 days. The results of the study were presented in a late-breaking session at the EuroPCR in June 2020. The conclusion of the study was that the CGuard™ Micronet™-covered stent use in consecutive unselected patients subjected to neuroprotected carotid artery stenting was associated with a greater than three-fold reduction in the procedure-generated mean cerebral lesion volume, and with zero post-procedural cerebral embolisms observed.

Key findings from the study are as follows:

Post Procedure (24-48 hours), the CGuard™ arm was observed to have a 78% reduction in the average volume of new cerebral lesions (157 mm3 vs. 700 mm3), a statistically significant improvement (p=0.007;
At 30 days, DW-MRI showed zero new cerebral lessons in the CGuard™ arm versus six in the Acculink™ arm (p=0.03);
At 30 days, there were zero strokes, myocardia infarctions or deaths in the CGuard arm and three events the Acculink™ arm (two strokes and one myocardial infarction).

Completed Clinical Trials for MGuard Bare-Metal Coronary Products

We have completed eight clinical trials with respect to our first generation stainless steel-based MGuard coronary device and our cobalt-chromium based MGuard Prime EPS stent. Our first generation MGuard stent combining the MicroNet with a stainless steel stent received CE mark approval for the treatment of coronary artery disease in the European Union in October 2007. We subsequently replaced the stainless steel stent with a more advanced cobalt-chromium based stent for MGuard Prime EPS.

The First in Men (FIM) study conducted in Germany from the fourth quarter of 2006 through the second quarter of 2008 focused on patients with occlusion in their stent graft. This group is considered to be in “high risk” for complications during and shortly after the procedure due to the substantial risk of occurrence of a thromboembolic event. The study demonstrated MGuard’s safety in this high risk group. This study was followed by the GUARD study in Brazil in 2007 with a similar patient population which reinforced the safety profile of MGuard in patients prone to procedural complications. The MAGICAL study was a pilot study in STEMI patients conducted in Poland from 2008 through 2012 which demonstrated safety, measured by MACE rates at 30 days following the procedure, as well as efficacy results, measured by the ability of MGuard to reestablish blood flow into the infarcted area of the muscle. Furthermore, we closed a public offeringconducted three registries (iMOS, IMR and iMOS Prime) that confirmed the feasibility of 442,424 sharesMGuard and MGuard Prime EPS for the treatment of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Series A Warrants to purchase up to 1,769,696 shares of common stock. Each share of Series B Convertible Preferred StockSTEMI patients and the accompanying Series A Warrantssafety of MGuard and MGuard Prime EPS in the STEMI patient group. Safety was repeatedly demonstrated in these trials and registries by the low mortality rate in the first month after the procedure.

In the second calendar quarter of 2011, we began the MGuard for Acute ST Elevation Reperfusion Trial (which we refer to as our “MASTER I trial”), a prospective, randomized study, which demonstrated that among patients with acute STEMI undergoing emergency PCI, patients treated with MGuard had superior rates of epicardial coronary flow (blood flow within the vessels that run along the outer surface of the heart) and complete ST-segment resolution, or restoration of blood flow to the heart muscle after a heart attack, compared to those treated with commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. The results of this trial are summarized in greater detail below.

Finally, the MASTER II trial, which we initially initiated as part of our efforts to seek approval of our MGuard Prime EPS by the FDA, was discontinued at our election in its current form in light of market conditions moving toward the use of drug-eluting stents over bare-metal stents. Analysis of the patients already enrolled in the MASTER II trial prior to its suspension, however, reconfirmed the MASTER I safety results due to a continued low mortality rate.

MASTER I Trial

In the second calendar quarter of 2011, we began the MASTER I trial, a prospective, randomized study in Europe, South America and Israel to compare the MGuard with commercially-approved bare metal and drug-eluting stents in achieving superior myocardial reperfusion (the restoration of blood flow) in primary angioplasty for the treatment of acute STEMI, the most severe form of heart attack. The MASTER I trial enrolled 433 subjects, 50% of whom were sold attreated with MGuard and 50% of whom were treated with a price of $33.00. Each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into 4 shares of common stock reflecting a conversion price equal to $8.25 per share.commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. The holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive cumulative dividendsdetailed acute and 30 days results from the trial were presented at the rate per shareTCT conference on October 24, 2012 and published (Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Evaluation of 15% per annuma Polyethylene Terephthalate Micronet Mesh–Covered Stent (MGuard) in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Stone et. al, JACC, 60; 2012). The results were as follows:

The primary endpoint of post-procedure complete ST-segment resolution (restoration of blood flow to the heart muscle after a heart attack) was statistically significantly improved in patients randomized to the MGuard compared to patients receiving a commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stent (57.8% vs. 44.7%).
Patients receiving MGuard exhibited superior rates of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow, which evidences normal coronary blood flow that fills the distal coronary bed completely, as compared to patients receiving a commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stent (91.7% vs. 82.9%), with comparable rates of myocardial blush grade 2 or 3 (83.9% vs. 84.7%) and corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) (17.0 vs. 18.1
Angiographic success rates (attainment of <50% final residual stenosis of the target lesion and final TIMI 3 flow) were higher in the MGuard group compared to commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents (91.7% vs 82.4%).
Mortality (0% vs. 1.9%) and major adverse cardiac events (1.8% vs. 2.3%) at 30 days post procedure were not statistically significantly different between patients randomized to MGuard as opposed to patients randomized to commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. All other major adverse cardiac event components, as well as stent thrombosis, were comparable between the MGuard and commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents.

The six month results from the MASTER I trial were presented at the 2013 EuroPCR Meeting, the official annual meeting of the stated valueEuropean Association for five years, payablePercutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, on May 23, 2013 in cash or common stock, at our discretion.Paris, France. The Series A Warrants are exercisable immediately and have a term of exercise of five yearsresults were as follows:

Mortality (0.5% vs. 2.8%) and major adverse cardiac events (5.2% vs. 3.4%) at 6 months post procedure were not statistically significantly different between patients randomized to the MGuard as compared to patients randomized to commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. All other major adverse cardiac event components, as well as stent thrombosis, were comparable between patients treated with MGuard and those treated with commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents.

The twelve month results from the dateMASTER I trial were presented at the TCT conference on October 29, 2013 and published (Mesh-Covered Embolic Protection Stent Implantation in ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Final 1-Year Clinical and Angiographic Results From the MGUARD for Acute ST Elevation Reperfusion Trial, Dudek et. al, Coronary Interventions, 2014). The results were as follows:

Mortality (1.0% vs. 3.3%) and major adverse cardiac events (9.1% vs. 3.3%) at 12 months post procedure were not statistically significantly different between patients randomized to the MGuard as opposed to those randomized to commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. All other major adverse cardiac events, as well as stent thrombosis, were comparable between the MGuard and commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents.

In summary, the MASTER I trial demonstrated that among patients with acute STEMI undergoing emergency PCI patients treated with MGuard had superior rates of issuanceepicardial coronary flow (blood flow within the vessels that run along the outer surface of the heart) and have an exercise price of $5.00 per share of common stock. The Series complete ST-segment resolution compared to those treated with commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. In addition, patients treated with MGuard showed a slightly lower mortality rate and a slightly higher major adverse cardiac event rate as compared to patients treated with commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents six and twelve months post procedure.

A Warrants commenced trading ondetailed table with the NYSE MKT under the ticker symbol “NSPR.WS” on August 1, 2016. We received gross proceeds of approximately $14.6 millionresults from the offering, before deducting placement agent feesMASTER I trial is set forth below. The “p-Value” refers to the probability of obtaining a given test result. Any p value less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

  MGuard  

Bare Metal Stents/Drug

Eluting Stents

  p-Value 
Number of Patients  217   216    
TIMI 0-1  1.8   5.6   0.01 
TIMI 3  91.7   82.9   0.006 
Myocardial blush grade 0-1  16.1   14.8   0.71 
Myocardial blush grade 3  74.2   72.1   0.62 
ST segment resolution >70  57.8   44.7   0.008 
30 day major adverse cardiac event  1.8   2.3   0.75 
6 month major adverse cardiac event  5.2   3.4   0.34 
12 month major adverse cardiac event  9.1   3.3   0.02 

Future Clinical Trials for CGuard EPS and offering expenses payable by us.MGuard Prime EPS

 

Effective asPost-marketing clinical trials (outside the United States) could be conducted to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on October 7, 2016, we amended our certificateCGuard EPS in specific indications. These trials would be designed to facilitate market acceptance and expand the use of incorporation in orderthe product. We expect to effectuate a 1-for-25 reverse stock splitbe able to rely upon CE mark approval of our outstanding shares of common stock.the product and other supporting clinical data to obtain local approvals.

 

We do not anticipate conducting additional post-marketing clinical trials for our bare-metal MGuard coronary products.

Growth StrategyOur Products

Below is a summary of our current products and products under development, and their intended applications.

MicroNet

MicroNet is our proprietary circular knitted mesh which wraps around a stent to protect patients from plaque debris flowing downstream upon deployment. MicroNet is made of a single fiber from a biocompatible polymer widely used in medical implantations. The size, or aperture, of the current MicroNet ‘pore’ is only 150-180 microns in order to maximize protection against the potentially dangerous plaque and thrombus.

CGuard – Carotid Applications

 

Our primary businessCGuard EPS combines our MicroNet mesh and a self-expandable nitinol stent (a stent that expands without balloon dilation pressure or need of an inflation balloon) in a single device for use in carotid artery applications. MicroNet is placed over and attached to an open cell nitinol metal stent platform which is designed to trap debris and emboli that can dislodge from the diseased carotid artery and potentially travel to the brain and cause a stroke. This danger is one of the greatest limitations of carotid artery stenting with conventional carotid stents and stenting methods. The CGuard EPS technology is a highly flexible stent system that conforms to the carotid anatomy.

We believe that our CGuard EPS design provides advantages over existing therapies in treating carotid artery stenosis, such as conventional carotid stenting and surgical endarterectomy, given the superior embolic protection characteristics provided by the MicroNet. We believe the MicroNet will provide acute embolic protection at the time of the procedure, but more importantly, we believe that CGuard EPS will provide post-procedure protection against embolic dislodgement, which can occur up to 48 hours post-procedure. It is in this post-procedure time frame that embolization is the source of post-procedural strokes in the brain. Schofer, et al. (“Late cerebral embolization after emboli-protected carotid artery stenting assessed by sequential diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging,” Journal of American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Interventions, Volume 1, 2008) have shown that the majority of the incidents of embolic showers associated with carotid stenting occur post-procedure.

Our CGuard EPS with over-the-wire delivery system received CE mark approval in the European Union in March 2013. In October 2014, we initiated a limited market release of CGuard EPS with over-the-wire delivery system for use in carotid artery applications in Germany, Poland and Italy.

In September 2014, we reported the results of the CGuard CARENET trial at the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (“TCT”) conference in Washington D.C. In the CARENET trial, the CGuard EPS system demonstrated better results over historical data using conventional commercially available carotid stents. In the third quarter of 2015 the results of the CGuard CARENET trial were published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. In November 2015, positive twelve-month follow-up data from the CGuard CARENET trial was presented at the 42nd Annual Symposium on Vascular and Endovascular Issues, documenting the benefits of the CGuard MicroNet technology as well as the patency benefits (maintaining the artery open) of the internal and external carotid arteries at twelve months.

In the first quarter of 2015, we introduced CGuard RX, the new rapid exchange delivery system for CGuard EPS. The rapid exchange delivery system has a guidewire that passes through the delivery system, running through the guiding catheter. It has one port, and thus, can be operated by one operator, while an over-the-wire-delivery system has two lumens and ports and requires two operators to perform the procedure. Our rapid exchange delivery system received CE mark approval in January 2015. We launched our CGuard EPS in Europe with the rapid exchange delivery system in multiple medical specialties that perform carotid artery stenting. These customers include interventional cardiologists, vascular surgeons, interventional neuroradiologists and interventional radiologists.

In September 2015, we announced full market launch of CGuard EPS in Europe. Subsequently, we launched CGuard EPS in Russia and certain countries in Latin America and Asia, including India. In September, 2020, we launched CGuard EPS in Brazil after receiving regulatory approval in July 2020, and we are seeking strategic partners for a potential launch of CGuard EPS in Japan and China.

In April 2017, we had a pre-IDE submission meeting with the FDA regarding CGuard EPS where we presented materials that we believed would support a formal IDE submission seeking approval to conduct a human clinical trial in the United States which included our draft synopsis for the clinical trial design. The FDA agreed to our pre-clinical test plan and clinical trial design. On July 26, 2019, we submitted an IDE application for CGuard EPS. In connection with such application, on August 23, 2019, we received a request for additional information from the FDA in support of our application. On September 8, 2020, we received IDE approval for CGuard™ Carotid Stent System, CARENET-III.

Additionally, we intend to continue to evaluate potential product enhancements and manufacturing enhancements for CGuard EPS expected to reduce cost of goods and/or provide the best-in-class performing delivery system. We cannot give any assurance that we will receive sufficient (or any) proceeds from future financings or the timing of such financings, if ever for potential product enhancements and manufacturing enhancements. In addition, such additional financings may be costly or difficult to complete. Even if we receive sufficient proceeds from future financings, there is no assurance that we will be able to timely apply for CE mark approval following our receipt of such proceeds. We believe these improvements may allow us to reduce cost of goods and increase penetration in our existing geographies and better position us for entry into new markets.

MGuard Products– Coronary Applications

Bare-Metal Stent MGuard Product. Our MGuard Prime EPS coronary product is comprised of MicroNet wrapped around a cobalt-chromium based bare-metal stent. In comparison to a conventional bare-metal stent, we believe our MGuard Prime EPS coronary product with MicroNet mesh provides protection from dangerous embolic showers in patients experiencing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, the most severe form of a heart attack, referred to as STEMI. Standard stents were not engineered for heart attack patients. Rather, they were designed for treating stable angina patients whose occlusion is different from that of an occlusion in a heart attack patient. In acute heart attack patients, the plaque or thrombus is unstable and often breaks up as the stent is implanted causing downstream blockages in a significant portion of heart attack patients. Our MGuard Prime EPS is integrated with a precisely engineered micro net mesh that is designed to prevent the unstable arterial plaque and thrombus that caused the heart attack blockage from breaking off.

NGuard — Neurovascular Applications

We began developing a neurovascular flow diverter, which we refer to as NGuard, which is an endovascular device that diverts blood flow away from cerebral aneurysms and ultimately seals the aneurysms. We have tested early flow diverter prototypes in initial pre-clinical testing in both simulated aneurysm bench models using various MicroNet configurations with varying aperture sizes, as well as in standard in vivo pre-clinical models, in which we observed aneurysm sealing and also wide open side branch vessels across which the device was placed. We have suspended all further development activity of NGuard until we obtain sufficient funding for such purpose.

PVGuard — Peripheral Vascular Applications

We intend to develop our MicroNet mesh sleeve and a self-expandable stent for use in peripheral vascular applications, to which we refer to as PVGuard. PVDs are usually characterized by the accumulation of plaque in arteries in the legs. This accumulation can lead to the need for amputation or even death, when untreated. PVD is treated either by trying to clear the artery of the blockage, or by implanting a stent in the affected area to push the blockage out of the way of normal blood flow.

As in carotid procedures, peripheral procedures are characterized by the necessity of controlling embolic showers both during and post-procedure. Controlling embolic showers is so important in these indications that physicians often use fully covered stents, at the risk of blocking branching vessels, to ensure that emboli do not fall into the bloodstream and move to the brain. We believe that our MicroNet design will provide substantial advantages over existing therapies in treating peripheral artery stenosis.

However, as we plan to focus our resources on the further expansion of our sales and marketing activities for CGuard EPS and, provided that we have sufficient resources, potential product enhancements and manufacturing enhancements for CGuard EPS expected to reduce cost of goods and/or provide the best-in-class performing delivery system and its submission for CE mark approval, we do not intend to pursue the development of PVGuard in the near future.

Completed Clinical Trials for CGuard EPS

CARENET

The CARENET trial was the first multi-center study of CGuard EPS following the receipt of CE mark of this device in March 2013. The CARENET trial was designed to evaluate feasibility and safety of CGuard EPS in treatment of carotid lesions in consecutive patients suitable for coronary artery stenting (“CAS”) in a multi-operator, real-life setting. The acute, 30 day, magnetic resonance imaging (“MRI”), ultrasound and six month clinical event results were presented at the LINC conference in Leipzig, Germany in February, 2015. In the third quarter of 2015, the results of the CGuard CARENET trial were published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. In November 2015, positive twelve month follow-up data from the CGuard CARENET trial was presented at the 42nd Annual Symposium on Vascular and Endovascular Issues, documenting the benefits of the CGuard MicroNet technology as well as the patency benefits (maintaining the artery open) of the internal and external carotid arteries at twelve months.

MACCE (myocardial infarction (“MI”), stroke or death) rate was 0.0% at 30 days. At six months, there was one death, which was not device or procedure-related but did result in a MACCE rate of 3.6% at six months. At twelve months there were two additional deaths, which were not device or procedure-related resulting in a MACCE rate of 10.7% at one year.

30 days (n=30)6 months (n=28)12 months (n=28)
MACCE (MI, stroke, death)(0) 0.0%(1) 3.6%(3) 10.7%
MI(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%
stroke(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%
death(0) 0.0%(1) 3.6%(3) 10.7%

CAS carries the risk of cerebral embolization during and following the procedure, leading to life-threatening complications, mainly cerebral ischemic events. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is a sensitive tool used to identify cerebral emboli during CAS by measuring “lesions” within the brain which are areas that are ischemic and do not receive oxygenated blood due to cerebral emboli. In the CARENET trial, 37.0% of patients treated with CGuard EPS had new ischemic lesions at 48 hours after the procedure, with an average volume of 0.039 cm3. Of these lesions, there was only one that remained at 30 days following the procedure and all others had resolved. Complete details appear in the following table. Where there is a second number shown below after a ± symbol, it indicates the potential error in the measurement.

  

48 hours

n=27

  

30 days

n=26

 
Subjects with new Acute Ischemic Lesions (“AIL”)  10   1 
Incidence of new lesions  37.0%  4.0%
Total number new AIL  83   1 
Avg. number new AIL per patient  3.19 ± 10.33   0.04 ± 0.20 
Average lesion volume (cm3)  0.039 ± 0.08   0.08 ± 0.00 
Maximum lesion volume (cm3)  0.445   0.116 
Permanent AIL at 30 days     1 

The healing process of the tissue and in-stent restenosis can be measured by a non-invasive form of ultrasound called duplex ultrasound. This type of ultrasound measures the velocity of the blood that flows within the carotid arteries, which increases exponentially as the lumen of the internal carotid artery narrows and the percent stenosis increases. One of the measurements is called PSV (peak systolic volume) and is known to be highly correlated to the degree of in-stent restenosis; PSV values higher than 300 cm/sec are indicative of >70% stenosis, while PSV values lower than 104 cm/sec are indicative of <30% restenosis and healthy healing. In the CARENET trial, duplex ultrasound measurements done at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months following the stenting procedure all attest to healthy normal healing without restenosis concerns, as the PSV values were 60.96 cm/sec ± 22.31, 85.24 cm/sec ± 39.56, and 90.22 cm/sec ± 37.72 respectively. The internal carotid artery was patent in all patients (100%).

The conclusions of the CARENET trial were:

The CARENET trial demonstrated safety of the CGuard EPS stent, with a 30 day MACCE rate of 0%.
Incidence of new ipsilateral lesions (percent of patients with new lesions on the ipsilateral side (same side where the stent was employed)) at 48 hours was reduced by almost half compared to published data, and volume was reduced almost tenfold.
All but one lesion had resolved completely by 30 days.
Twelve month data showed no stroke or stroke-related deaths, and no cardiac adverse events.
CGuard EPS offers enhanced benefits for patients undergoing CAS with unprecedented safety.

Physician-Sponsored Clinical Trials for CGuard—PARADIGM-101 Study

PARADIGM-101 (Prospective evaluation of All-comer peRcutaneous cArotiD revascularization In symptomatic and increased-risk asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, using CGuard™ Mesh-covered embolic prevention stent system-101) was an investigator-led, single center study with the objective of evaluating feasibility and outcome of routine use of CGuard EPS in 101 consecutive unselected all-comer patients referred for carotid revascularization, initiated in 2015. In May 2016, the 30-day results were presented at the EuroPCR 2016 Late-Breaking Clinical Trial Session in Paris, and in the Journal of EuroIntervention.

Key findings from the PARADIGM-101 study and the follow-up data are as follows:

CGuard EPS delivery success was 99.1%. The clinical evaluation also found no device foreshortening or elongation;
Angiographic diameter stenosis or vessel narrowing was reduced from 83±9% to only 6.7±5% (p<0.001);
Periprocedural death/major stroke/ myocardial infarction (“MI”) rates were 0%;
One event was adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee as a minor stroke (0.9%), with no change in NIH Stroke Scale or modified Ranking scale;

The results of the PARADIGM-101 study demonstrated that CGuard EPS can safely be used in a high risk, all-comer population of patients with carotid artery stenosis and indicated that routine use of CGuard EPS may prevent cerebral events, such as strokes, by holding plaque against the vessel wall, preventing emboli from being released into the blood stream. The PARADIGM-101 study found that CGuard EPS is applicable in up to 90% of all-comer patients with carotid stenosis.

Clinical Results and Mechanical Properties of the Carotid CGUARD Double-Layered Embolic Prevention Stent Study

“Clinical Results and Mechanical Properties of the Carotid CGUARD Double-Layered Embolic Prevention Stent Study” was an investigator-led, prospective single-center study which evaluated CGuard EPS in 30 consecutive patients with internal carotid artery stenosis disease with the objective of reporting early clinical outcomes with a novel MicroNet covered stent for the internal carotid artery and the in vitro investigation of the device’s mechanical properties. In October 2016, the 30-day positive results were published online-ahead-of-print in the Journal of Endovascular Therapy.

Key findings from the study are as follows:

100% success in implanting CGuard EPS without residual stenosis;
No peri- or post-procedural complications;
No deaths, major adverse events, minor or major strokes, or new neurologic symptoms during the six months following the procedure;
Modified Rankin Scale improved for the symptomatic patients from 1.56 prior to the procedure to 0 afterwards;
All vessels treated with CGuard EPS remained patent (open) at six months; and
DW-MRI performed in 19 of 30 patients found no new ipsilateral lesions after 30 days and after six months compared with the baseline DW-MRI studies.

Additionally, based on engineering evaluations, the study concluded that CGuard EPS provides a high radial force and strong support in stenotic lesions. The stent is easy to use and safe to implant because it does not foreshorten and its structure adapts well to changes in diameter and direction of tortuous vascular anatomies. The MicroNet mesh of CGuard did not cause any changes to specific mechanical parameters of the underlying stent.

CGUARD Mesh-Covered Stent in Real World: The IRON-Guard Registry

“CGUARD Mesh-Covered Stent in Real World: The IRON-Guard Registry using CGuard EPS” was a physician initiated prospective multi-center registry that included 200 patients from 12 medical centers in Italy. The objective of the study was to report 30-day outcomes (including MACCE) in a prospective series of patients who were treated with CGuard EPS between April 2015 and June 2016. In January 2017, 30-day results were presented at the Leipzig Interventional Course (LINC) 2017 and published in the Journal of EuroIntervention in May 2017. The 12 month follow-up was published in the Journal of EuroIntevention in October 2018.

Key 30-day results presented were:

100% success in implanting CGuard EPS;
No MI, major stroke or death at 30 days;
There were two transient ischemic attacks and five periprocedural minor strokes, including one thrombosis solved by surgery.
Total elimination of post-procedural neurologic complications by 30 days;
DW-MRI performed pre-procedure and between 24 and 72 hours post-procedure in 61 patients, indicated that 12 patients had new micro emboli (19%).
At 12 months, there were no new major neurological adverse events, thrombosis or external carotid occlusion recorded;
One myocardial infarction occurred at 12 months.

Peri-procedural brain lesions prevention in CAS (3PCAS): Randomized trial comparing CGuard stent vs. WallStent™ Study

3PCAS study was an independent investigator-led single center randomized clinical trial, comparing CGuard EPS vs. WallStent™, intended to evaluate the incidence of peri-procedural diffusion-weighted-magnetic-resonance-imaging (DW-MRI) new brain lesions after carotid artery stenting. Sixty-one consecutive patients referred for carotid revascularization (between January 2015 and October 2016) were eligible for the study. The results of the 3PCAS study was published in the International Journal of Cardiology in September 2018. The discussion distinguished between peri-procedural (from procedure to 48h -72h) and post-procedural periods (72h to 30 days) where the CGuard EPS demonstrated a reduction in the post-procedural embolic effect during the carotid plaque healing period. In contrast, there was no difference between the two stent groups during the peri-procedural stage because of, according to the published article, the presence of bilateral/contralateral lesions (lesions resulting from the contralateral artery from the non-treated carotid) which suggest that the peri-procedural neurological damage may have originated from extra-carotid sources (outside of the artery which was treated and outside the stent itself).

Initial Clinical Study of the New CGuard EPS MicroNet Covered Carotid Stent: “One Size Fits All”

“Initial Clinical Study of the New CGuard EPS MicroNet Covered Carotid Stent: ‘One Size Fits All’” was an investigator-led, single-center study, which evaluated CGuard EPS in 30 consecutive patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery with the objective of evaluating the CGuard EPS MicroNet covered stent for its ability to adjust to different vessel diameters. The results of the study were published in the Journal of Endovascular Therapy in May 2019. The conclusion of the study as reported was that CGuard EPS has high conformability combined with an almost equivalent outward radial force at expansion diameters ranging from 5.5 to 9.0 mm. The first clinical results demonstrate the “One Size Fits All” stent can be implanted in internal carotid arteries with reference diameters within this range.

Key findings from the study were as follows:

100% technical success in implanting CGuard EPS;
No neurological events within 30 days;
The chronic outward force normalized by stent length demonstrated a near-equivalent radial force outcome; and
The stent displayed only a minor difference between the minimal radial force at 9.0 mm (0.195 N/mm) and the maximal radial force at 5.5 mm (0.330 N/mm).

Preliminary Results from a Prospective Real-World Multicenter Clinical Practice of Carotid Artery Stenting Using the CGuard Embolic Prevention System: The IRONGUARD 2 Study

“Preliminary Results From a Prospective Real-World Multicenter Clinical Practice of Carotid Artery Stenting Using the CGuard Embolic Prevention System: The IRONGUARD 2 Study” is a physician initiated prospective multi-center registry enrolling 733 patients from 20 medical centers in Italy, from January 2017 to June 2019. The objective of the study is to utilize our proprietary technologyevaluate periprocedural (24 hours), post-procedural (up to become30 days), and 12-month outcomes in a largest, prospective, multicenter series of patients submitted for protected carotid artery stenting with the industry standardCGuard Embolic Prevention System. The 24-hour, 30-day and 12-month preliminary results (data available on 726 patients out of the 733 treated) were presented at the Leipzig Interventional Course (LINC) in January 2021. The study’s preliminary results from the IRONGUAURD 2 study suggested in a real-world evaluation of carotid artery stenting, Cguard EPS can be safely used for treatment of complex vascular and coronary disease and to provideextracranial carotid artery stenosis, allowing a superior solution tolow rate of of post procedural adverse events by 12 months.

Key findings from the common acute problems caused by current stenting procedures, suchstudy are as restenosis, embolic showers and late thrombosis. We are pursuing the following business strategies in order to achieve this objective.follows:

 

 

Grow our presence100%% procedural success in existing and new markets forimplanting CGuard EPS.We have fully launched CGuard EPS in most European and Latin American countries, through a combination of distributor sales organizations. We are also pursuing additional registrations and contracts with local distributors in other countries in Europe, Asia and Latin America.EPS;

   
 Continue

1 death from hemorrhagic stroke (patient was admitted for immediate treatment of CAS due to leverage MicroNet technology to develop additional applications for interventional cardiologistsstroke), 2 minor strokes, 6 TIAs and vascular surgeons. In addition to the applications described above, we believe that we will eventually be able to utilize our proprietary MicroNet technology to address imminent market needs for new product innovations to significantly improve patients’ care. We continue to broadly developone nonfatal AMI at 24 hours;

1 minor stroke, 2 TIAs, three AMIs, no deaths and protect intellectual property using our mesh technology. Examples of some areas include peripheral vascular disease, neurovascular disease, renal artery disease,no stent thrombosis/occlusions between 24 hours and bifurcation disease.30 days; and
   
 Establish relationships with collaborative1 minor stroke, 4 TIAs, 2 AMIs and development partners8 deaths ( the 2 mentioned AMIs, 4 malignancies, 1 suicide and 1 undefined complication in Guillain-Barré Syndrome) between 30 days and 1 year.

The SIBERIA Trial for Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Conventional Versus Micronet™-Covered Stent Use in Percutaneous Neuroprotected Carotid Artery Revascularization: Peri-procedural and 30-day Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Outcomes

“The SIBERIA Trial for Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Conventional Versus Micronet™-Covered Stent Use in Percutaneous Neuroprotected Carotid Artery Revascularization: Peri-procedural and 30-day Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Outcomes” was an investigator-initiated randomized clinical trial, single-center study, which evaluated one hundred patients who qualified for carotid revascularization with high risk for surgery and were randomized 1:1 to either CGuard EPS or AcculinkTM. The primary endpoints were incidence and volume of new cerebral embolic post-procedural lesions (24-48 hours) as determined by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). The principal secondary endpoints included incidence of periprocedural or postprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction and death at 30 days. The results of the study were presented in a late-breaking session at the EuroPCR in June 2020. The conclusion of the study was that the CGuard™ Micronet™-covered stent use in consecutive unselected patients subjected to neuroprotected carotid artery stenting was associated with a greater than three-fold reduction in the procedure-generated mean cerebral lesion volume, and with zero post-procedural cerebral embolisms observed.

Key findings from the study are as follows:

Post Procedure (24-48 hours), the CGuard™ arm was observed to fully develop and market our existing and future products. We are seeking strategic partners for collaborative research, development, marketing, distribution, or other agreements, which could assist with our development and commercialization efforts for CGuard EPS and NGuard, as well as future efforts with MGuard Prime EPS, MGuard DES, and other potential products that are based on our MicroNet technology.have a 78% reduction in the average volume of new cerebral lesions (157 mm3 vs. 700 mm3), a statistically significant improvement (p=0.007;
   
 Continue to protect and expand our portfolio of patents. Our MicroNet technology and the use of patents to protect it are critical to our success. We own numerous patents for our MicroNet technology. Twelve separate patent applications have been filedAt 30 days, DW-MRI showed zero new cerebral lessons in the United States , some of which have corresponding patent applications and/or issued patentsCGuard™ arm versus six in Canada, China, Europe, Israel, India, and South Africa. We believe these patents and patent applications collectively cover all of our existing products, and may be useful for protecting our future technological developments. We intend to aggressively continue patenting new technology, and to actively pursue any infringement covered by any of our patents. We believe that our patents, and patent applications once allowed, are important for maintaining the competitive differentiation of our products and maximizing our return on research and development investments.Acculink™ arm (p=0.03);
   
 Resume developmentAt 30 days, there were zero strokes, myocardia infarctions or deaths in the CGuard arm and successfully commercialize MGuard DES. While we have limitedthree events the focus of product development to carotidAcculink™ arm (two strokes and neurovascular products, if we resume development of our coronary products, we plan to evaluate opportunities to further develop MGuard DES.one myocardial infarction).

 49

Business Segment and Geographic Areas

Prior to October 2014, all revenue was derived from sales of MGuard Prime EPS. For the twelve months ended December 31 , 2016, 39% of our revenue was derived from sales of this product, with the remaining 61% of our revenue derived from sales of CGuard EPS. For financial information about our one operating and reportable segment and geographic areas, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 12 to our financial statements for the twelve months ended December 31 , 2016 included in this prospectus.

Our Industry

 

CarotidCompleted Clinical Trials for MGuard Bare-Metal Coronary Products

We have completed eight clinical trials with respect to our first generation stainless steel-based MGuard coronary device and our cobalt-chromium based MGuard Prime EPS stent. Our first generation MGuard stent combining the MicroNet with a stainless steel stent received CE mark approval for the treatment of coronary artery disease in the European Union in October 2007. We subsequently replaced the stainless steel stent with a more advanced cobalt-chromium based stent for MGuard Prime EPS.

The First in Men (FIM) study conducted in Germany from the fourth quarter of 2006 through the second quarter of 2008 focused on patients with occlusion in their stent graft. This group is considered to be in “high risk” for complications during and shortly after the procedure due to the substantial risk of occurrence of a thromboembolic event. The study demonstrated MGuard’s safety in this high risk group. This study was followed by the GUARD study in Brazil in 2007 with a similar patient population which reinforced the safety profile of MGuard in patients prone to procedural complications. The MAGICAL study was a pilot study in STEMI patients conducted in Poland from 2008 through 2012 which demonstrated safety, measured by MACE rates at 30 days following the procedure, as well as efficacy results, measured by the ability of MGuard to reestablish blood flow into the infarcted area of the muscle. Furthermore, we conducted three registries (iMOS, IMR and iMOS Prime) that confirmed the feasibility of MGuard and MGuard Prime EPS for the treatment of STEMI patients and the safety of MGuard and MGuard Prime EPS in the STEMI patient group. Safety was repeatedly demonstrated in these trials and registries by the low mortality rate in the first month after the procedure.

In the second calendar quarter of 2011, we began the MGuard for Acute ST Elevation Reperfusion Trial (which we refer to as our “MASTER I trial”), a prospective, randomized study, which demonstrated that among patients with acute STEMI undergoing emergency PCI, patients treated with MGuard had superior rates of epicardial coronary flow (blood flow within the vessels that run along the outer surface of the heart) and complete ST-segment resolution, or restoration of blood flow to the heart muscle after a heart attack, compared to those treated with commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. The results of this trial are summarized in greater detail below.

Finally, the MASTER II trial, which we initially initiated as part of our efforts to seek approval of our MGuard Prime EPS by the FDA, was discontinued at our election in its current form in light of market conditions moving toward the use of drug-eluting stents over bare-metal stents. Analysis of the patients already enrolled in the MASTER II trial prior to its suspension, however, reconfirmed the MASTER I safety results due to a continued low mortality rate.

MASTER I Trial

 

Carotid arteries are locatedIn the second calendar quarter of 2011, we began the MASTER I trial, a prospective, randomized study in Europe, South America and Israel to compare the MGuard with commercially-approved bare metal and drug-eluting stents in achieving superior myocardial reperfusion (the restoration of blood flow) in primary angioplasty for the treatment of acute STEMI, the most severe form of heart attack. The MASTER I trial enrolled 433 subjects, 50% of whom were treated with MGuard and 50% of whom were treated with a commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. The detailed acute and 30 days results from the trial were presented at the TCT conference on each sideOctober 24, 2012 and published (Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Evaluation of a Polyethylene Terephthalate Micronet Mesh–Covered Stent (MGuard) in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Stone et. al, JACC, 60; 2012). The results were as follows:

The primary endpoint of post-procedure complete ST-segment resolution (restoration of blood flow to the heart muscle after a heart attack) was statistically significantly improved in patients randomized to the MGuard compared to patients receiving a commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stent (57.8% vs. 44.7%).
Patients receiving MGuard exhibited superior rates of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow, which evidences normal coronary blood flow that fills the distal coronary bed completely, as compared to patients receiving a commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stent (91.7% vs. 82.9%), with comparable rates of myocardial blush grade 2 or 3 (83.9% vs. 84.7%) and corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) (17.0 vs. 18.1
Angiographic success rates (attainment of <50% final residual stenosis of the target lesion and final TIMI 3 flow) were higher in the MGuard group compared to commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents (91.7% vs 82.4%).
Mortality (0% vs. 1.9%) and major adverse cardiac events (1.8% vs. 2.3%) at 30 days post procedure were not statistically significantly different between patients randomized to MGuard as opposed to patients randomized to commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. All other major adverse cardiac event components, as well as stent thrombosis, were comparable between the MGuard and commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents.

The six month results from the MASTER I trial were presented at the 2013 EuroPCR Meeting, the official annual meeting of the neckEuropean Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, on May 23, 2013 in Paris, France. The results were as follows:

Mortality (0.5% vs. 2.8%) and major adverse cardiac events (5.2% vs. 3.4%) at 6 months post procedure were not statistically significantly different between patients randomized to the MGuard as compared to patients randomized to commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. All other major adverse cardiac event components, as well as stent thrombosis, were comparable between patients treated with MGuard and those treated with commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents.

The twelve month results from the MASTER I trial were presented at the TCT conference on October 29, 2013 and providepublished (Mesh-Covered Embolic Protection Stent Implantation in ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Final 1-Year Clinical and Angiographic Results From the primary blood supplyMGUARD for Acute ST Elevation Reperfusion Trial, Dudek et. al, Coronary Interventions, 2014). The results were as follows:

Mortality (1.0% vs. 3.3%) and major adverse cardiac events (9.1% vs. 3.3%) at 12 months post procedure were not statistically significantly different between patients randomized to the MGuard as opposed to those randomized to commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. All other major adverse cardiac events, as well as stent thrombosis, were comparable between the MGuard and commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents.

In summary, the brain. Carotid artery disease, also called carotid artery stenosis, is a typeMASTER I trial demonstrated that among patients with acute STEMI undergoing emergency PCI patients treated with MGuard had superior rates of atherosclerosis (hardeningepicardial coronary flow (blood flow within the vessels that run along the outer surface of the arteries) that is one of theheart) and complete ST-segment resolution compared to those treated with commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. In addition, patients treated with MGuard showed a slightly lower mortality rate and a slightly higher major risk factors for ischemic stroke. In carotid artery disease, plaque accumulates in the artery walls, narrowing the artery and disrupting the blood supplyadverse cardiac event rate as compared to the brain. This disruption in blood supply, togetherpatients treated with plaque debris breaking off the artery walls and traveling to the brain, are the primary causes of stroke. According to the World Heart Federation (http://www.world-heart-federation.org/cardiovascular-health/stroke/,last visited on Mar. 11, 2016), every year, 15 million people worldwide suffer a stroke, and nearly six million die and another five million are left permanently disabled. According to the same source, stroke is the second leading cause of disability, after dementia.

The potential global market value of carotid stents is approximately $500 million, approximately $300 million of which consists of the U.S. market and approximately $200 million of which consists of the rest of the world (source: JMP Securities 2014 and Cowen 2014). Carotid artery stenting is a minimally invasive treatment option for carotid artery disease and an alternative to carotid endarterectomy, where a surgeon accesses the blocked carotid artery though an incision in the neck, and then surgically removes the plaque. Endovascular techniques using stents and carotid embolic prevention system protect against plaque and debris traveling downstream, blocking off the vessel and disrupting blood flow. We believe that the use of a stent with an embolic protection system should increase the number of patients being treated since it would avoid the need for complex surgery.

Coronary

Physicians and patients may select from among a variety of treatments to address coronary artery disease, including pharmaceutical therapy, balloon angioplasty, stenting withcommercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents six and coronary artery bypass graft procedures,twelve months post procedure.

A detailed table with the selection often depending uponresults from the stageMASTER I trial is set forth below. The “p-Value” refers to the probability of the disease.obtaining a given test result. Any p value less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

 

  MGuard  

Bare Metal Stents/Drug

Eluting Stents

  p-Value 
Number of Patients  217   216    
TIMI 0-1  1.8   5.6   0.01 
TIMI 3  91.7   82.9   0.006 
Myocardial blush grade 0-1  16.1   14.8   0.71 
Myocardial blush grade 3  74.2   72.1   0.62 
ST segment resolution >70  57.8   44.7   0.008 
30 day major adverse cardiac event  1.8   2.3   0.75 
6 month major adverse cardiac event  5.2   3.4   0.34 
12 month major adverse cardiac event  9.1   3.3   0.02 

The global market value of coronary products is estimated at $5.9 billion, of which $4.2 billion is

Future Clinical Trials for stable anginaCGuard EPS and $1.7 billion is for acute myocardial infarctions according to Health Research International (June 2011). According to the 2014 MEDTECH OUTLOOK produced in December 2013 by BMO Capital Markets (“MEDTECH OUTLOOK”), revenues from the global coronary stent market are predicted to slightly decline, although in volume of stents the market is predicted to continue to grow. We believe the growth in volume is due to the appeal for less invasive percutaneous coronary intervention (“PCI”) procedures and advances in technology coupled with the increase in the elderly population, obesity rates and advances in technology.

NeurovascularMGuard Prime EPS

 

The neurovascularPost-marketing clinical trials (outside the United States) could be conducted to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of CGuard EPS in specific indications. These trials would be designed to facilitate market focuses on catheter-delivered products usedacceptance and expand the use of the product. We expect to treat strokes that already happened or unruptured brain aneurysms that could leadbe able to strokes. Inrely upon CE mark approval of the latter case, coils are wound into blood vessel bulgesproduct and other supporting clinical data to block blood flow entering the aneurysms to prevent the aneurysms from rupturing. Endovascular treatment of arterial aneurysm has evolved substantially over the past two decades, transitioning from an investigational therapy into routine clinical practice and ultimately emerging as the treatment of choice for many lesions(source: Medtech Ventures 2009, Aneurysm Flow Modulating Device Market). We believe that the market for aneurysm flow modulating devices is still in the embryonic stage with windows of opportunities for early entrance.obtain local approvals.

 

The current global marketWe do not anticipate conducting additional post-marketing clinical trials for the aneurysm flow modulating devices is estimated at $550 million, and the current market value of the flow diversion market segment is estimated to be $125 million. The neurovascular market includes over-the-wire, flow-guided microcatheters, guiding catheters, coil and liquid embolics, neurovascular stents and flow diversion stents. According to iData Research, the market is expected to be driven by the conversion from surgical procedures to endovascular techniques in the treatment of aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations.

Peripheral

Peripheral vascular diseases (“PVD”) are caused by the formation of atherosclerotic plaques in arteries, which carry blood to organs, limbs and head. It is also known as peripheral artery occlusive disease or peripheral artery disease. It comprises diseases pertaining to both peripheral veins and peripheral arteries, affecting the peripheral and cardiac circulation in the body. PVD includes diseases outside of the heart and brain, but most times refers to the leg and foot.our bare-metal MGuard coronary products.

 

The global market value of PVDs is estimated at $1.7 billion (source: Global Data 2011). The overall peripheral vascular devices market consists of nine different product segments: peripheral vascular stents, chronic total occlusion devices, peripheral transluminal angioplasty balloon catheters, atherectomy devices, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty guidewires, aortic stents, embolic protection devices, synthetic surgical grafts and inferior vena cava filters(source: Grand View Research 2014). Treatment modalities and methods have considerably improved during the last several years, and this trend is expected to continue (source: Global Data 2011). Stents and balloons hold the majority of the share in the peripheral vascular devices market. Peripheral stents are more often used in combination with balloon angioplasty to open the veins, so that blood can flow through the blocked veins in the body.

The growing prevalence of PVD is expected to cause increased demand for treatment options. The expansion of the elderly population is contributing to increasing incidence rates of PVD. The percentage of the global population above the age of 50 is expected to reach 17% by 2030. As the risk of developing PVD increases with age, a growing elderly population translates into a growing incidence of PVD (source: Global Data 2011). The growing global geriatric population base also triggers increasing demand for minimally invasive endovascular procedures on account of their shorter recovery time, lesser scaring and lesser chances of post - surgery infections. In addition, a growing prevalence of disease causing lifestyle factors and eating habits such as high consumption of alcohol and tobacco products is expected to boost peripheral vascular devices market demand by triggering the incidence rates of cardiac arrest, blood clotting and other vascular diseases(source: Grand View Research 2014).

Our Products

 

Below is a summary of our current products and products under development, and their intended applications.

 

MicroNet

 

MicroNet is our proprietary circular knitted mesh which wraps around a stent to protect patients from plaque debris flowing downstream upon deployment. MicroNet is made of a single fiber from a biocompatible polymer widely used in medical implantations. The size, or aperture, of the current MicroNet ‘pore’ is only 150-180 microns in order to maximize protection against the potentially dangerous plaque and thrombus.

CGuard Carotid Applications

 

Our CGuard EPS combines our MicroNet mesh and a self-expandable nitinol stent (a stent that expands without balloon dilation pressure or need of an inflation balloon) in a single device for use in carotid artery applications. MicroNet is placed over and attached to an open cell nitinol metal stent platform which is designed to trap debris and emboli that can dislodge from the diseased carotid artery and potentially travel to the brain and cause a stroke. This danger is one of the greatest limitations of carotid artery stenting with conventional carotid stents and stenting methods. The CGuard EPS technology is a highly flexible stent system that conforms to the carotid anatomy.

 

We believe that our CGuard EPS design provides advantages over existing therapies in treating carotid artery stenosis, such as conventional carotid stenting and surgical endarterectomy, given the superior embolic protection characteristics provided by the MicroNet. We believe the MicroNet will provide acute embolic protection at the time of the procedure, but more importantly, we believe that CGuard EPS will provide post-procedure protection against embolic dislodgement, which can occur up to 48 hours post-procedure. It is in this post-procedure time frame that embolization is the source of post-procedural strokes in the brain. Schofer, et al. (“Late cerebral embolization after emboli-protected carotid artery stenting assessed by sequential diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging,”Journal of American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Interventions, Volume 1, 2008) have shown that the majority of the incidents of embolic showers associated with carotid stenting occur post-procedure.

Our CGuard EPS with over-the-wire delivery system received CE mark approval in the European Union in March 2013. In October 2014, we initiated a limited market release of CGuard EPS with over-the-wire delivery system for use in carotid artery applications in Germany, Poland and Italy.

 

In September 2014, we reported the results of the CGuard CARENET trial at the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (“TCT”) conference in Washington D.C. In the CARENET trial, the CGuard EPS system demonstrated better results over historical data using conventional commercially available carotid stents. In the third quarter of 2015 the results of the CGuard CARENET trial were published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. In November 2015, positive twelve monthtwelve-month follow-up data from the CGuard CARENET trial was presented at the 42nd42nd Annual Symposium on Vascular and Endovascular Issues, documenting the benefits of the CGuard MicroNet technology as well as the patency benefits (maintaining the artery open) of the internal and external carotid arteries at twelve months.

In the first quarter of 2015, we introduced CGuard RX, the new rapid exchange delivery system for CGuard EPS. The rapid exchange delivery system has a guidewire that passes through the delivery system, running through the guiding catheter. It has one port, and thus, can be operated by one operator, while an over-the-wire-delivery system has two lumens and ports and requires two operators to perform the procedure. Our rapid exchange delivery system received CE mark approval in January 2015. We launched our CGuard EPS in Europe with the rapid exchange delivery system in multiple medical specialties that perform carotid artery stenting. These customers include interventional cardiologists, vascular surgeons, interventional neuroradiologists and interventional radiologists.

 

In September 2015, we announced full market launch of CGuard EPS in Europe. Subsequently, we launched CGuard EPS in ArgentinaRussia and Colombia,certain countries in Latin America and have received regulatory approval to commercializeAsia, including India. In September, 2020, we launched CGuard EPS in RussiaBrazil after receiving regulatory approval in November 2016. We plan toJuly 2020, and we are seeking strategic partners for a potential launch of CGuard EPS in Russia in the first half of 2017.Japan and China.

 

We intendIn April 2017, we had a pre-IDE submission meeting with the FDA regarding CGuard EPS where we presented materials that we believed would support a formal IDE submission seeking approval to conduct a human clinical trial in the United States and prepared awhich included our draft clinical protocol synopsis that could support a pivotalfor the clinical trial design. The FDA agreed to our pre-clinical test plan and clinical trial design. On July 26, 2019, we submitted an IDE application for CGuard EPS. In connection with such application, on August 23, 2019, we received a premarket approval application submissionrequest for approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. A pre- IDE meeting with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is expected to take place during the first quarter of 2017, by which we plan to seek the consentadditional information from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to the roadmap proposed.

FDA in support of our application. On September 8, 2020, we received IDE approval for CGuard™ Carotid Stent System, CARENET-III.

 

If we receive sufficient proceeds from the exercise of the Series C Warrants, we plan to develop CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter (5 French gauge), whichAdditionally, we intend to submitcontinue to evaluate potential product enhancements and manufacturing enhancements for CE mark approval within three calendar quarters of receiving such proceeds. Based on the level of interest in this product that we have observed in our clinical trials, we believe that CGuard EPS with a smallerexpected to reduce cost of goods and/or provide the best-in-class performing delivery catheter will enable us to meet the market demand for minimally invasive devices, which, we believe, may have broader and easier usage, and for a lower profile system used in procedures in which predilation could be problematic. We also believe that CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter will enable us to have a competitive advantage in penetrating the Asia Pacific market, since its population is generally smaller than in Western countries. In addition, we believe that CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter will enable us to offer CGuard EPS for use in transradial catheterization, which, we believe, is gaining favor among interventionalists.system. We cannot give any assurance that we will receive sufficient (or any) proceeds from the exercise of the Series C Warrantsfuture financings or the timing of such financings, if ever for potential product enhancements and manufacturing enhancements. In addition, such additional financings may be costly or difficult to complete. Even if we receive sufficient proceeds from future financings, there is no assurance that we will be able to timely apply for CE mark approval following our receipt of such proceeds, if ever.proceeds. We cannot predict when or if the Series C Warrants will be exercised. It is possible that the Series C Warrantsbelieve these improvements may expireallow us to reduce cost of goods and may never be exercised.increase penetration in our existing geographies and better position us for entry into new markets.

 

MGuard Products —Products– Coronary Applications

Bare-Metal Stent MGuard Product. Our MGuard Prime EPS coronary product is comprised of MicroNet wrapped around a cobalt-chromium based bare-metal stent. In comparison to a conventional bare-metal stent, we believe our MGuard Prime EPS coronary product with MicroNet mesh provides protection from dangerous embolic showers in patients experiencing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, the most severe form of a heart attack, referred to as STEMI. Standard stents were not engineered for heart attack patients. Rather, they were designed for treating stable angina patients whose occlusion is different from that of an occlusion in a heart attack patient. In acute heart attack patients, the plaque or thrombus is unstable and often breaks up as the stent is implanted causing downstream blockages in a significant portion of heart attack patients. Our MGuard Prime EPS is integrated with a precisely engineered micro net mesh that is designed to prevent the unstable arterial plaque and thrombus that caused the heart attack blockage from breaking off.

 

During the fourth quarter of 2014, due to a shift in industry preferences away from bare-metal stents in favor of drug-eluting (drug-coated) stents, we decided to curtail developing and promoting our bare-metal stent platform and instead focus on the development of a drug-eluting stent product. Although we have curtailed development and promotion of MGuard Prime EPS, our distributors and sales staff generally cover all of our current products in the market, including MGuard Prime EPS.

Drug-Eluting Stent MicroNet Product Candidate. During 2015, we completed the second phase of development work for our MGuard DES, pursuant to which we incorporated our MicroNet with a drug-eluting stent manufactured by a prospective partner. We believe that a drug-eluting stent with MicroNet has the potential to improve certain performance metrics over the MGuard Prime EPS and attract a broader portion of the cardiologists in the worldwide stent market who are more accustomed to using drug-eluting stents. However, due to our limited resources we have tabled further development of MGuard DES at this time.

NGuard — Neurovascular Applications

 

We arebegan developing a neurovascular flow diverter, which we refer to as NGuard, which is an endovascular device that diverts blood flow away from cerebral aneurysms and ultimately seals the aneurysms. Flow diversion is a growing market segment within the neurovascular medical device field. Current commercial flow diverters are highly flexible dense metal mesh tubes that go across most types of cerebral aneurysms and divert the blood flow away from the aneurysm with the desired end result of sealing the aneurysm. The challenges with the current flow diverters are that they (i) are difficult to place given the high metal content in the device, which makes it more difficult to move the device through the delivery system due to resistance from the metal, and to subsequently accurately place it, (ii) need to be accurately placed to avoid crossing and blocking other cerebral vessels, which could cause additional damage by cutting off blood flow to sections of the brain, (iii) require chronic use of anti-thrombotic medications due to the amount of metal in the cerebral vasculature, which could cause thrombotic complications, and (iv) do not allow a physician to re-access the aneurysm if the aneurysm does not seal, in which event the aneurysm may need to be treated with another therapy such as aneurysm coils, due to the tight metal mesh that will not allow other devices to pass through the flow diverter.

Our flow diverter prototype will include our MicroNet that has been employed in CGuard EPS and MGuard Prime EPS. MicroNet has already demonstrated the ability to effectively seal aneurysms in both human coronary arteries using the MGuard Prime EPS and aneurysms in the carotid arteries using CGuard EPS in human clinical situations without the need for additional devices or procedures (coils or a second stent) (source: Journal of Medical Case Reports http://www.jmedicalcasereports.com/content/4/1/238). For our flow diverter, we plan to utilize an open cell, highly flexible metal scaffold to which MicroNet would be attached. We believe our flow diverter could be more accurately delivered due to a lower metal content scaffold than current commercial flow diverters; lower metal content in our flow diverter may reduce the need for long-term anticoagulation; the open cell metal scaffold combined with the MicroNet may allow passage of other devices through the MicroNet mesh without compromising the MicroNet, thus allowing a physician to reaccess the aneurysm, if needed; and our flow diverter should be capable of being delivered through a state-of-the-art microcatheter for accurate placement without constant repositioning. We have tested early flow diverter prototypes in initial pre-clinical testing in both simulated aneurysm bench models using various MicroNet configurations with varying aperture sizes, as well as in standard in vivo pre-clinical models, in which we observed aneurysm sealing and also wide open side branch vessels across which the device was placed. However, as we plan to focus our resources on theWe have suspended all further expansion of our sales and marketing activities for CGuard EPS and MGuard Prime EPS and, provided that we have sufficient resources, the development of CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter (5 French gauge) and its submission for CE mark approval, we do not intend to resume further developmentactivity of NGuard until at least the third quarter of 2018.

we obtain sufficient funding for such purpose.

PVGuard — Peripheral Vascular Applications

We intend to develop our MicroNet mesh sleeve and a self-expandable stent for use in peripheral vascular applications, to which we refer to as PVGuard. PVDs are usually characterized by the accumulation of plaque in arteries in the legs. This accumulation can lead to the need for amputation or even death, when untreated. PVD is treated either by trying to clear the artery of the blockage, or by implanting a stent in the affected area to push the blockage out of the way of normal blood flow.

 

As in carotid procedures, peripheral procedures are characterized by the necessity of controlling embolic showers both during and post-procedure. Controlling embolic showers is so important in these indications that physicians often use fully covered stents, at the risk of blocking branching vessels, to ensure that emboli do not fall into the bloodstream and move to the brain. We believe that our MicroNet design will provide substantial advantages over existing therapies in treating peripheral artery stenosis.

 

However, as we plan to focus our resources on the further expansion of our sales and marketing activities for CGuard EPS and, MGuard Prime EPS and, provided that we have sufficient resources, the development ofpotential product enhancements and manufacturing enhancements for CGuard EPS with a smallerexpected to reduce cost of goods and/or provide the best-in-class performing delivery catheter (5 French gauge)system and its submission for CE mark approval, we do not intend to pursue the development of PVGuard in the near future.

Completed Clinical Trials for CGuard EPS

CARENET

 

The CARENET trial was the first multi-center study of CGuard EPS following the receipt of CE mark of this device in March 2013. The CARENET trial was designed to evaluate feasibility and safety of CGuard EPS in treatment of carotid lesions in consecutive patients suitable for coronary artery stenting (“CAS”) in a multi-operator, real-life setting. The acute, 30 day, magnetic resonance imaging (“MRI”), ultrasound and six month clinical event results were presented at the LINC conference in Leipzig, Germany in February, 2015. In the third quarter of 2015, the results of the CGuard CARENET trial were published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. In November 2015, positive twelve month follow-up data from the CGuard CARENET trial was presented at the 42nd42nd Annual Symposium on Vascular and Endovascular Issues, documenting the benefits of the CGuard MicroNet technology as well as the patency benefits (maintaining the artery open) of the internal and external carotid arteries at twelve months.

 

MACCE (myocardial infarction (“MI”), stroke or death) rate was 0.0% at 30 days. At six months, there was one case of death, which was not stentdevice or procedure-related andbut did result in a MACCE was increased torate of 3.6%. at six months. At twelve months there were three cases of death,two additional deaths, which were not stentdevice or procedure-related andresulting in a MACCE was 11.1%.rate of 10.7% at one year.

 

  30 days (n=30)  6 months (n=28)  12 months (n=27) 
MACCE (MI, stroke, death)  (0)0.0%  (1)3.6%  (3)11.1%
MI  (0)0.0%  (0)0.0%  (0)0.0%
Stroke  (0)0.0%  (0)0.0%  (0)0.0%
Death  (0)0.0%  (1)3.6%  (3)11.1%
30 days (n=30)6 months (n=28)12 months (n=28)
MACCE (MI, stroke, death)(0) 0.0%(1) 3.6%(3) 10.7%
MI(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%
stroke(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%(0) 0.0%
death(0) 0.0%(1) 3.6%(3) 10.7%

 

In addition, 30 day and 6 month follow-up data from the CARENET study determined the following MACCE events as compared to MACCE events from studies using conventional carotid stents:

  

30 days

(14 trials, 5255 patients)(1)

  

6 months

(3 trials, 1053 patients)(2)

 
MACCE (MI, stroke, death)  5.72%  8.09%

(1) Trials included in analysis: ARCHeR pooled, ARMOUR, BEACH, CABERNET, CREATE, EMPIRE, EPIC, MAVErIC 1+2, MAVErIC International, PRIAMUS, SAPPHIRE, SECURITY, PROFI, ICSS

(2) Values extrapolated from event curves (source: The CARENET all-comer trial using the CGuard micronet-covered carotid embolic prevention stent, presented by Dr. Piotr Musialek at the LINC 2015 conference)

CAS carries the risk of cerebral embolization during and following the procedure, leading to life-threatening complications, mainly cerebral ischemic events. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) is a sensitive tool used to identify cerebral emboli during CAS by measuring “lesions” within the brain which are areas that are ischemic and do not receive oxygenated blood due to cerebral emboli. In the CARENET trial, 37.0% of patients treated with CGuard EPS had new ischemic lesions at 48 hours after the procedure, with an average volume of 0.039 cm3.cm3. Of these lesions, there was only one that remained at 30 days following the procedure and all others had resolved. Complete details appear in the following table. Where there is a second number shown below after a ±,± symbol, it indicates the rate of error.potential error in the measurement.

  

48 hours

n=27

  

30 days

n=26

 
Subjects with new Acute Ischemic Lesions (“AIL”)  10   1 
Incidence of new lesions  37.0%  4.0%
Total number new AIL  83   1 
Avg. number new AIL per patient  3.19 ± 10.33   0.04 ± 0.20 
Average lesion volume (cm3)  0.039 ± 0.08   0.08 ± 0.00 
Maximum lesion volume (cm3)  0.445   0.116 
Permanent AIL at 30 days     1 

 

  

48 hours

n=27

  

30 days

n=26

 
Subjects with new Acute Ischemic Lesions (“AIL”)  10   1 
Incidence of new lesions  37.0%  4.0%
Total number new AIL  83   1 
Avg. number new AIL per patient  3.19 ± 10.33   0.04 ± 0.20 
Average lesion volume (cm3)  0.039 ± 0.08   0.08 ± 0.00 
Maximum lesion volume (cm3)  0.445   0.116 
Permanent AIL at 30 days     1 

The healing process of the tissue and in-stent restenosis can be measured by a non-invasive form of ultrasound called duplex ultrasound. This type of ultrasound measures the velocity of the blood that flows within the carotid arteries, which increases exponentially as the lumen of the internal carotid artery narrows and the percent stenosis increases. One of the measurements is called PSV (peak systolic volume) and is known to be highly correlated to the degree of in-stent restenosis; PSV values higher than 300 cm/sec are indicative of >70% stenosis, while PSV values lower than 104 cm/sec are indicative of <30% restenosis and healthy healing. In the CARENET trial, duplex ultrasound measurements done at 30 days, 6 months and 12 months following the stenting procedure all attest to healthy normal healing without restenosis concerns, as the PSV values were 60.96 cm/sec ± 22.31, 85.24 cm/sec ± 39.56, and 90.22 cm/sec ± 37.72 respectively. The internal carotid artery was patent in all patients (100%).

 

The conclusions of the CARENET trial were:

 

 

The CARENET trial demonstrated safety of the CGuard EPS stent, with a 30 day MACCE rate of 0%.

   
 

Incidence of new ipsilateral lesions (percent of patients with new lesions on the ipsilateral side (same side where the stent was employed ))employed)) at 48 hours was reduced by almost half compared to published data, and volume was reduced almost tenfold.

   
 All but one lesion had resolved completely by 30 days.
   
 Twelve month data showed no change in peak systolic velocity between 6 monthsstroke or stroke-related deaths, and 12 months, suggesting no restenosis concerns.cardiac adverse events.
   
 CGuard EPS offers unique clinicalenhanced benefits for patients undergoing CAS with unprecedented safety.

 

Physician-Sponsored Clinical Trials for CGuard—PARADIGM-101 Study

 

PARADIGM-101 (Prospective evaluation ofAll-comer peRcutaneous cArotiD revascularizationIn symptomatic and increased-risk asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, using CGuard™Mesh-covered embolic prevention stent system-101) was an investigator-led, single center study with the objective of evaluating feasibility and outcome of routine anti-embolic stent systemuse of CGuard EPS in 101 consecutive unselected all-comer patients referred for carotid revascularization, initiated in 2015. In May 2016, the 30-day positive results were presented at the EuroPCR 2016 Late-Breaking Clinical Trial Session in Paris, and in the Journal of EuroIntervention. In November 2016, positive twelve month follow-up data was presented at the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics (TCT) 2016 conference, documenting the benefits of the CGuard MicroNet technology at twelve months.

 

Key findings from the PARADIGM-101 study and the follow-up data are as follows:

 

 CGuard EPS delivery success was 99.1%. The clinical evaluation also found no device foreshortening or elongation;
   
 Angiographic diameter stenosis or vessel narrowing was reduced from 83±9% to only 6.7±5% (p<0.001);
   
 Periprocedural complicationsdeath/major stroke/ myocardial infarction (“MI”) rates were 0%;
   
 

One event was adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee as a minor stroke (0.9%), with no change in NIH Stroke Scale or modified Ranking scale; and

At 12 months, no new adverse events (0%) were noted by independent neurologist evaluation.

 

The results of the PARADIGM-101 study demonstrated that CGuard EPS can safely be used onin a high risk, all-comer population of patients with carotid artery stenosis and indicateindicated that routine use of CGuard EPS may prevent cerebral events, such as strokes, by holding plaque against the vessel wall, preventing emboli from being released into the blood stream. The PARADIGM-101 study found that CGuard EPS is applicable in up to 90% of all-comer patients with carotid stenosis.

Clinical Results and Mechanical Properties of the Carotid CGUARD Double-Layered Embolic Prevention Stent Study

 

Clinical Results and Mechanical Properties of the Carotid CGUARD Double-Layered Embolic Prevention Stent StudyStudy” was an investigator-led, prospective single-center study which evaluated CGuard EPS in 30 consecutive patients with internal carotid artery stenosis disease with the objective of reporting early clinical outcomes with a novel double-layerMicroNet covered stent for the internal carotid artery and the in vitro investigation of the stent’sdevice’s mechanical properties. In October 2016, the 30-day positive results were published online-ahead-of-print in the Journal of EnovascularEndovascular Therapy.

 

Key findings from the study are as follows:

 

 

100% success in implanting CGuard EPS without residual stenosis;

   
 No peri- or post-procedural complications;
   
 No deaths, major adverse events, minor or major strokes, or new neurologic symptoms during the six months following the procedure;
   
 Modified Rankin Scale improved for the symptomatic patients from 1.56 prior to the procedure to 0 afterwards;
   
 

All vessels treated with CGuard EPS remained patent (open) at six months; and

   
 DW-MRI performed in 19 of 30 patients found no new ipsilateral lesions after 30 days and after six months compared with the baseline DW-MRI studies.

 

Additionally, based on engineering evaluations, the study concluded that CGuard EPS provides a high radial force and strong support in stenotic lesions. The stent is easy to use and safe to implant because it does not foreshorten and its structure adapts well to changes in diameter and direction of tortuous vascular anatomies. The MicroNet mesh of CGuard EPS did not cause any changes to specific mechanical parameters of the underlying stent.

 

CGUARD Mesh-Covered Stent in Real World: The IRON-Guard Registry

 

CGUARD Mesh-Covered Stent in Real World: The IRON-Guard Registry using CGuard EPS isEPS” was a physician initiated prospective multi-center registry whichthat included 200 patients from 12 medical centers in Italy. The objective of the study was to report 30-day outcomes (including MACCE) in a prospective series of patients submitted to protected carotid artery stentingwho were treated with CGuard EPS between April 2015 and June 2016. In January 2017, 30-day results were presented at the Leipzig Interventional Course (LINC) 2017 and published in the Journal of EuroIntervention in May 2017. The 12 month follow-up was published in the Journal of EuroIntevention in October 2018.

 

Key 30-day results presented are as follows:were:

 

 100% success in implanting CGuard EPS;
   
 No MI, major stroke or death at 30 days;
   
 All vessels treated with CGuard EPS remained patent (open) at six months;There were two transient ischemic attacks and five periprocedural minor strokes, including one thrombosis solved by surgery.
Total elimination of post-procedural neurologic complications by 30 days;
   
 DW-MRI performed pre procedurepre-procedure and 24/between 24 and 72 hours post-procedure in 61 patients, of whichindicated that 12 patients had new micro emboli (19%).
At 12 months, there were no new major neurological adverse events, thrombosis or external carotid occlusion recorded;
One myocardial infarction occurred at 12 months.

 

Peri-procedural brain lesions prevention in CAS (3PCAS): Randomized trial comparing CGuard stent vs. WallStent™ Study

3PCAS study was an independent investigator-led single center randomized clinical trial, comparing CGuard EPS vs. WallStent™, intended to evaluate the incidence of peri-procedural diffusion-weighted-magnetic-resonance-imaging (DW-MRI) new brain lesions after carotid artery stenting. Sixty-one consecutive patients referred for carotid revascularization (between January 2015 and October 2016) were eligible for the study. The results of the 3PCAS study was published in the International Journal of Cardiology in September 2018. The discussion distinguished between peri-procedural (from procedure to 48h -72h) and post-procedural periods (72h to 30 days) where the CGuard EPS demonstrated a reduction in the post-procedural embolic effect during the carotid plaque healing period. In contrast, there was no difference between the two stent groups during the peri-procedural stage because of, according to the published article, the presence of bilateral/contralateral lesions (lesions resulting from the contralateral artery from the non-treated carotid) which suggest that the peri-procedural neurological damage may have originated from extra-carotid sources (outside of the artery which was treated and outside the stent itself).

Initial Clinical Study of the New CGuard EPS MicroNet Covered Carotid Stent: “One Size Fits All”

“Initial Clinical Study of the New CGuard EPS MicroNet Covered Carotid Stent: ‘One Size Fits All’” was an investigator-led, single-center study, which evaluated CGuard EPS in 30 consecutive patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery with the objective of evaluating the CGuard EPS MicroNet covered stent for its ability to adjust to different vessel diameters. The results of the study were published in the Journal of Endovascular Therapy in May 2019. The conclusion of the study as reported was that CGuard EPS has high conformability combined with an almost equivalent outward radial force at expansion diameters ranging from 5.5 to 9.0 mm. The first clinical results demonstrate the “One Size Fits All” stent can be implanted in internal carotid arteries with reference diameters within this range.

Key findings from the study were as follows:

100% technical success in implanting CGuard EPS;
No neurological events within 30 days;
The chronic outward force normalized by stent length demonstrated a near-equivalent radial force outcome; and
The stent displayed only a minor difference between the minimal radial force at 9.0 mm (0.195 N/mm) and the maximal radial force at 5.5 mm (0.330 N/mm).

Preliminary Results from a Prospective Real-World Multicenter Clinical Practice of Carotid Artery Stenting Using the CGuard Embolic Prevention System: The IRONGUARD 2 Study

“Preliminary Results From a Prospective Real-World Multicenter Clinical Practice of Carotid Artery Stenting Using the CGuard Embolic Prevention System: The IRONGUARD 2 Study” is a physician initiated prospective multi-center registry enrolling 733 patients from 20 medical centers in Italy, from January 2017 to June 2019. The objective of the study is to evaluate periprocedural (24 hours), post-procedural (up to 30 days), and 12-month outcomes in a largest, prospective, multicenter series of patients submitted for protected carotid artery stenting with the CGuard Embolic Prevention System. The 24-hour, 30-day and 12-month preliminary results (data available on 726 patients out of the 733 treated) were presented at the Leipzig Interventional Course (LINC) in January 2021. The study’s preliminary results from the IRONGUAURD 2 study suggested in a real-world evaluation of carotid artery stenting, Cguard EPS can be safely used for treatment of extracranial carotid artery stenosis, allowing a low rate of of post procedural adverse events by 12 months.

Key findings from the study are as follows:

100%% procedural success in implanting CGuard EPS;

1 death from hemorrhagic stroke (patient was admitted for immediate treatment of CAS due to stroke), 2 minor strokes, 6 TIAs and one nonfatal AMI at 24 hours;

1 minor stroke, 2 TIAs, three AMIs, no deaths and no stent thrombosis/occlusions between 24 hours and 30 days; and
1 minor stroke, 4 TIAs, 2 AMIs and 8 deaths ( the 2 mentioned AMIs, 4 malignancies, 1 suicide and 1 undefined complication in Guillain-Barré Syndrome) between 30 days and 1 year.

The SIBERIA Trial for Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Conventional Versus Micronet™-Covered Stent Use in Percutaneous Neuroprotected Carotid Artery Revascularization: Peri-procedural and 30-day Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Outcomes

“The SIBERIA Trial for Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Conventional Versus Micronet™-Covered Stent Use in Percutaneous Neuroprotected Carotid Artery Revascularization: Peri-procedural and 30-day Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Outcomes” was an investigator-initiated randomized clinical trial, single-center study, which evaluated one hundred patients who qualified for carotid revascularization with high risk for surgery and were randomized 1:1 to either CGuard EPS or AcculinkTM. The primary endpoints were incidence and volume of new cerebral embolic post-procedural lesions (24-48 hours) as determined by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). The principal secondary endpoints included incidence of periprocedural or postprocedural stroke, myocardial infarction and death at 30 days. The results of the study were presented in a late-breaking session at the EuroPCR in June 2020. The conclusion of the study was that the CGuard™ Micronet™-covered stent use in consecutive unselected patients subjected to neuroprotected carotid artery stenting was associated with a greater than three-fold reduction in the procedure-generated mean cerebral lesion volume, and with zero post-procedural cerebral embolisms observed.

Key findings from the study are as follows:

Post Procedure (24-48 hours), the CGuard™ arm was observed to have a 78% reduction in the average volume of new cerebral lesions (157 mm3 vs. 700 mm3), a statistically significant improvement (p=0.007;
At 30 days, DW-MRI showed zero new cerebral lessons in the CGuard™ arm versus six in the Acculink™ arm (p=0.03);
At 30 days, there were zero strokes, myocardia infarctions or deaths in the CGuard arm and three events the Acculink™ arm (two strokes and one myocardial infarction).

Completed Clinical Trials for MGuard Bare-Metal Coronary Products

 

We have completed eight clinical trials with respect to our first generation stainless steel-based MGuard stentcoronary device and our cobalt-chromium based MGuard Prime EPS stent. Our first generation MGuard stent combining the MicroNet with a stainless steel stent received CE mark approval for the treatment of coronary artery disease in the European Union in October 2007. We subsequently replaced the stainless steel stent with a more advanced cobalt-chromium based stent for MGuard Prime EPS.

 

The First in Men (FIM) study conducted in Germany from the fourth quarter of 2006 through the second quarter of 2008 focused on patients with occlusion in their stent graft. This group is considered to be in “high risk” for complications during and shortly after the procedure due to the substantial risk of occurrence of a thromboembolic event. The study demonstrated MGuard stent’sMGuard’s safety in this high risk group. This study was followed by the GUARD study in Brazil in 2007 with a similar patient population which reinforced the safety profile of MGuard stents in patients prone to procedural complications. The MAGICAL study was a pilot study in STEMI patients conducted in Poland from 2008 through 2012 which demonstrated safety, measured by MACE rates at 30 days following the stent procedure, as well as efficacy results, measured by the ability of MGuard to reestablish blood flow into the infarcted area of the muscle. Furthermore, we conducted three registries (iMOS, IMR and iMOS Prime) that confirmed the feasibility of MGuard and MGuard Prime EPS for the treatment of STEMI patients and the safety of MGuard and MGuard Prime EPS in the STEMI patient group. Safety was repeatedly demonstrated in these trials and registries by the low mortality rate in the first month after the procedure.

In the second calendar quarter of 2011, we began the MGuard for Acute ST Elevation Reperfusion Trial (which we refer to as our “MASTER I trial”), a prospective, randomized study, which demonstrated that among patients with acute STEMI undergoing emergency PCI, patients treated with MGuard had superior rates of epicardial coronary flow (blood flow within the vessels that run along the outer surface of the heart) and complete ST-segment resolution, or restoration of blood flow to the heart muscle after a heart attack, compared to those treated with commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. The results of this trial are summarized in greater detail below.

Finally, the MASTER II trial, which we initially initiated as part of our efforts to seek approval of our MGuard Prime EPS by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,FDA, was discontinued at our election in its current form in light of market conditions moving toward the use of drug-eluting stents over bare-metal stents. Analysis of the patients already enrolled in the MASTER II trial prior to its suspension, however, reconfirmed the MASTER I safety results due to a continued low mortality rate.

MASTER I Trial

 

In the second calendar quarter of 2011, we began the MASTER I trial, a prospective, randomized study in Europe, South America and Israel to compare the MGuard with commercially-approved bare metal and drug-eluting stents in achieving superior myocardial reperfusion (the restoration of blood flow) in primary angioplasty for the treatment of acute STEMI, the most severe form of heart attack .attack. The MASTER I trial enrolled 433 subjects, 50% of whom were treated with MGuard and 50% of whom were treated with a commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stent.stents. The detailed acute and 30 days results from the trial were presented at the TCT conference on October 24, 2012 and published (Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Evaluation of a Polyethylene Terephthalate Micronet Mesh–Covered Stent (MGuard) in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Stone et. Al,al, JACC, 60; 2012). The results were as follows:

 

 

The primary endpoint of post-procedure complete ST-segment resolution (restoration of blood flow to the heart muscle after a heart attack) was statistically significantly improved in patients randomized to the MGuard compared to patients receiving a commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stent (57.8% vs. 44.7%).

   
 Patients receiving MGuard exhibited superior rates of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow, which evidences normal coronary blood flow that fills the distal coronary bed completely, as compared to patients receiving a commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stent (91.7% vs. 82.9%), with comparable rates of myocardial blush grade 2 or 3 (83.9% vs. 84.7%) and corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) (17.0 vs. 18.1), all markers of optimal blood flow to the heart.18.1
   
 

Angiographic success rates (attainment of <50% final residual stenosis of the target lesion and final TIMI 3 flow) were higher in the MGuard group compared to commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents (91.7% vs 82.4%).

   
 Mortality (0% vs. 1.9%) and major adverse cardiac events (1.8% vs. 2.3%) at 30 days post procedure were not statistically significantly different between patients randomized to MGuard as opposed to patients randomized to commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. All other major adverse cardiac event components, as well as stent thrombosis, were comparable between the MGuard and commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents.

 

The six month results from the MASTER I trial which were presented at the 2013 EuroPCR Meeting, the official annual meeting of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, on May 23, 2013 in Paris, France. The results were as follows:

 

 

Mortality (0.5% vs. 2.8%) and major adverse cardiac events (5.2% vs. 3.4%) at 6 months post procedure were not statistically significantly different between patients randomized to the MGuard as compared to patients randomized to commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. All other major adverse cardiac event components, as well as stent thrombosis, were comparable between patients treated with MGuard and those treated with commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents.

The twelve month results from the MASTER I trial were presented at the TCT conference on October 29, 2013 and published (Mesh-Covered Embolic Protection Stent Implantation in ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Final 1-Year Clinical and Angiographic Results From the MGUARD for Acute ST Elevation Reperfusion Trial, Dudek e. el,et. al, Coronary Interventions, 2014.2014). The results were as follows:

 

 

Mortality (1.0% vs. 3.3%) and major adverse cardiac events (9.1% vs. 3.3%) at 12 months post procedure were not statistically significantly different between patients randomized to the MGuard as opposed to those randomized to commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. All other major adverse cardiac events, as well as stent thrombosis, were comparable between the MGuard and commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents.

In summary, the MASTER I trial demonstrated that among patients with acute STEMI undergoing emergency PCI patients treated with MGuard had superior rates of epicardial coronary flow (blood flow within the vessels that run along the outer surface of the heart) and complete ST-segment resolution compared to those treated with commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents. In addition, patients treated with MGuard showed a slightly lower mortality rate and a slightly higher major adverse cardiac event rate as compared to patients treated with commercially-approved bare metal or drug-eluting stents six and twelve months post procedure.

 

A detailed table with the results from the MASTER I trial is set forth below. The “p-Value” refers to the probability of obtaining a given test result. Any p value less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant.

 

 MGuard  

Bare Metal

Stents/Drug Eluting Stents

  p-Value  MGuard  

Bare Metal Stents/Drug

Eluting Stents

  p-Value 
Number of Patients  217   216      217   216    
TIMI 0-1  1.8   5.6   0.01   1.8   5.6   0.01 
TIMI 3  91.7   82.9   0.006   91.7   82.9   0.006 
Myocardial blush grade 0-1  16.1   14.8   0.71   16.1   14.8   0.71 
Myocardial blush grade 3  74.2   72.1   0.62   74.2   72.1   0.62 
ST segment resolution >70  57.8   44.7   0.008   57.8   44.7   0.008 
30 day major adverse cardiac event  1.8   2.3   0.75   1.8   2.3   0.75 
6 month major adverse cardiac event  5.2   3.4   0.34   5.2   3.4   0.34 
12 month major adverse cardiac event  9.1   3.3   0.02   9.1   3.3   0.02 

 

Future Clinical Trials for CGuard EPS and MGuard Prime EPS

 

Post-marketing clinical trials (outside the United States) could be conducted to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of CGuard EPS in specific indications. These trials would be designed to facilitate market acceptance and expand the use of the product. We shouldexpect to be able to rely upon CE mark approval of the product and other supporting clinical data to obtain local approvals.

 

We are currently preparing materials required to conduct a clinical trial of CGuard EPS in the United States and have a draft clinical protocol synopsis that we believe could support a clinical trial for submission for approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Once complete, we plan to request a pre-submission guidance meeting with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

We do not anticipate conducting additional post-marketing clinical trials for our bare-metal MGuard coronary products.

Growth Strategy

Our primary business objective is to utilize our proprietary MicroNet technology and products to become the industry standard for treatment of stroke, complex vascular and coronary disease and to provide a superior solution to the common acute problems caused by current stenting procedures, such as restenosis, embolic showers and late thrombosis. We are pursuing the following business strategies to achieve this objective.

Widen the adoption of CGuard EPS. We are seeking to expand the population of CGuard EPS patients in those countries in which CGuard EPS is commercially available. In particular, our focus is on establishing CGuard EPS as a viable alternative (in appropriate cases) to conventional carotid stents and vascular surgery within the applicable medical communities. We intend to accomplish this goal by continuing to publish and present our clinical data, support investigator-initiated clinical registries and exploring addition of a procedural protection device to our portfolio incorporating the principal of reverse flow of the carotid artery as an adjuctive alternative to femoral access. We have partnered and will continue to seek out partnerships with organizations focused on the treatment of stroke. We will also continue to engage advisory boards and to develop a network of key opinion leaders to assist us in our efforts to widen the adoption of CGuard EPS.
Grow our presence in existing and new markets for CGuard EPS. We have launched CGuard EPS in most European and Latin American countries through a comprehensive distributor sales organizations network. We are continuing to focus on larger growing markets through this network by supporting our distributors with a comprehensive marketing and clinical education programs. In November 2018, we obtained approval for reimbursement and commercial sale for CGuard EPS in Australia and immediately launched the product. We are also pursuing additional product registrations and distribution contracts with local distributors in other countries in Europe, Asia and Latin America.
Continue to leverage our MicroNet technology to develop additional applications for interventional cardiologists and vascular surgeons. In addition to the applications described above, we believe that we will eventually be able to utilize our proprietary MicroNet technology to address imminent market needs for new product innovations to significantly improve patients’ care. We continue to broadly develop and protect intellectual property using our mesh technology. Examples of some areas include peripheral vascular disease, neurovascular disease, renal artery disease and bifurcation disease.
Establish relationships with collaborative and development partners to fully develop and market our existing and future products. We are seeking strategic partners for collaborative research, development, marketing, distribution, or other agreements, which could assist with our development and commercialization efforts for CGuard EPS and MGuard DES, and other potential products that are based on our MicroNet technology.
Resume development and successfully commercialize MGuard DES. While we have limited the focus of product development to our carotid products, if we resume development of our coronary products, we plan to evaluate opportunities to further develop MGuard DES.
Portfolio expansion and pipeline development We will continue to invest in advancing our portfolio with new delivery system alternatives to facilitate the use of CGuard by all physicians. Our delivery systems will enable all endovascular access points including accessory devices for Arterial Venous (AV) shunting.

 

Competition

 

The markets in which we compete are highly competitive, subject to change and impacted by new product introductions and other activities of industry participants.

Carotid

 

The carotid stent markets in the United States and Europe are dominated by Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific Corporation, Covidien Ltd. (currently part of Medtronic, Inc.), and Cordis Corporation (currently part of Cardinal Health, Inc.). Gore Medical and Terumo Medical Corporation produce a polytetrafluoroethylene mesh-covered stent and a double layer metal stent, respectively. All of these larger companies have substantially greater capital resources, larger customer bases, broader product lines, larger sales forces, greater marketing and management resources, larger research and development staffs and larger facilities than ours and have established reputations and relationships with our target customers, as well as worldwide distribution channelsmethods that are more effective than ours. However, we believe that the European market is somewhat fragmented, and, in our opinion, smaller competitors may be able to gain market share with greater flexibility.

 

 58

Coronary

 

The bare-metal stent and the drug-eluting stent markets in the United States and Europe are dominated by Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific Corporation, and Medtronic, Inc. In Europe, the future, wemarket is now almost exclusively dominated by drug eluding stents and is rapidly becoming so in the rest of the world. (Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 1;(92(4):E262-E270. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27375. Epub 2017 Oct 13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29027735). We believe that physicians will look to next-generation stent technology to compete with existing therapies. These newSuch next-generation technologies will likely include bio-absorbable stents, stents that focus on treating bifurcated lesions, and stents with superior polymer and drug coatings, and many industry participants are working to improve stenting procedures in the future as the portfolio of available stent technologies rapidly increases.

According to the MEDTECH OUTLOOK, the three major players (Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific Corporation and Medtronic, Inc.) in the worldwide coronary stent market have a combined total market share of approximately 92%. To date, our sales are not significant enough to register in market share. As such, one of the challenges we face to further our product growth is the competition from numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in the therapeutics area, as well as competition from academic institutions, government agencies and research institutions. Most of our current and potential competitors, including but not limited to those listed above, have, and will continue to have, substantially greater financial, technological, research and development, regulatory and clinical, manufacturing, marketing and sales, distribution and personnel resources than we do. Due to ongoing consolidation in the industry, there are high barriers to entry for small manufacturers in both the European and the United States markets.U.S. markets and the rest of the world.

 

Neurovascular

 

Stryker Corporation dominatedLeading industry players in the global interventional neurology market in 2014. The other key players in thisneurovascular devices market include Medtronic, plc,Stryker, Terumo and Johnson & Johnson, Terumo Corporation, Penumbra, Abbott Laboratories, Merit Medical Systems,Johnson. Acquisitions and mergers are increasingly used as a strategy for product portfolio expansion and to grow footprint. (Global Market Insights, Inc., W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Microport Scientific Corporation, and Medikit Co., Ltd., among others. (source: Markets and Markets 2015). - Devices Market Share 2018-2024 Industry Size Report. https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/neurovascular-devices-market)

 

Research and Development Expenses

During the twelve months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we spent $1.3 million and $3.6 million, respectively, on research and development.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and Marketing

Based on the positive CGuard EPS clinical data, we initiated the commercial launch of CGuard EPS in CE marked countries in early 2015. In September 2015, we announced full market launch of CGuard EPS in Europe.

In 2017, we decided to shift our commercial strategy to focus on sales of our products through local distribution partners and our own internal sales initiatives to gain greater reach into all the relevant clinical specialties and to expand our geographic coverage. Our current strategy seeks to broaden our sales efforts to transition vascular surgeons from carotid endarterectomy procedures to carotid stenting with CGuard EPS, which we believe can greatly expand our customer base. We have focused and we plan to continue to focus our marketing efforts primarily on key growth markets and to evaluate opportunities in new territories if and when they become available. In addition, we are using international trade shows and industry conferences to gain market exposure and brand recognition. We continue to work with leading physicians to enhance our marketing effort and are developing relationships with new key opinion leaders to champion our technology and work with us in clinical studies

 

Currently, we are actively selling our MGuard coronary products with a bio-stable MicroNet through local distributors in Europe, Latin America, the Middle East and Asia.

Based on the positive CGuard EPS clinical data, we commercially launched CGuard EPS in CE marked countries in early 2015. We initially sold CGuard products through a distributor network as we did with MGuard coronary products. In September 2015, we announced full market launch of CGuard EPS in Europe.

We plan to focus our marketing efforts primarily on Europe, Asia and Latin America and direct sales through our own internal sales initiatives as well as through distribution partners. In addition , we are using international trade shows and industry conferences to gain market exposure and brand recognition. We plan to work with leading physicians to enhance our marketing efforts.

 

Product Positioning

 

When treating carotid artery disease, we believe that there is an opportunity to enter the market with bare-metal stent platform and to become a competitive player without a drug-eluting stent platform. Therefore, we believe that CGuard EPS is poised for commercial growth in 2020 as more and more positive clinical data is presented.

Additionally, we intend to continue to evaluate potential product enhancements and manufacturing enhancements for CGuard EPS expected to reduce cost of goods or provide the best-in-class performing delivery system. We believe these improvements may allow us to reduce cost of goods and increase penetration in our existing geographies and better position us for entry into new markets. Finally, we do not expect that it would be crucial to use a drug-eluting stent platform to compete in certain new markets such as the neurovascular market, and hence, we plan to continue to explore this area of opportunity.

The MGuard coronary products have initially penetrated the market by entering segments with indications that present high risks of embolic dislodgement, notably acute MI and saphenous vein graft coronary interventions. Even though MGuard technology has demonstrated its advantages with clinical data, it is based on a bare-metal platform while the market demand has shifted away from bare-metal stents in favor of drug-eluting stents.

 

When treating carotid artery disease, we believe that there is an opportunity to enter the market with bare-metal stent platform and to become a competitive player without a drug-eluting stent platform. Therefore, we believe that CGuard EPS is poised for commercial growth in 2017 as more and more positive clinical data is presented. If we receive sufficient proceeds from the exercise of the Series C Warrants, we plan to develop CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter (5 French gauge), which we intend to submit for CE mark approval within three calendar quarters of receiving such proceeds. Based on the level of interest in this product that we have observed in our clinical trials, we believe that CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter will enable us to meet the market demand for minimally invasive devices, which, we believe, may have broader and easier usage, and for a lower profile system used in procedures in which predilation could be problematic. We also believe that CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter will enable us to have a competitive advantage in penetrating the Asia Pacific market, since its population is generally smaller than in Western countries. In addition, we believe that CGuard EPS with a smaller delivery catheter will enable us to offer CGuard EPS for use in transradial catheterization, which, we believe, is gaining favor among interventionalists. Finally, we do not expect that it would be crucial to use a drug-eluting stent platform to compete in certain new markets such as the neurovascular market, and hence, we plan to continue to explore this area of opportunity.

 59

Insurance Reimbursement

 

In most countries, a significant portion of a patient’s medical expenses is covered by third-party payers.payors. Third-party payerspayors can include both government funded insurance programs and private insurance programs. While each payerpayor develops and maintains its own coverage and reimbursement policies, the vast majority of payerspayors, in many instances, have similarly established policies. Allpolicies, and in the U.S., for example, coverage policies and reimbursement rates of private payors are often influenced by those established by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The CGuard products and MGuard coronary products and CGuard products sold to dateto-date in applicable foreign countries have been designed and labeled in such a way as to facilitate the utilization of existing reimbursement codes for such countries, and we intend to continue to design and label our present and future products in a manner consistent with this goal.

 

While most countries have established reimbursement codes for stenting procedures, certain countries may require additional clinical data before recognizing coverage and reimbursement for the MGuard coronary products and CGuard products and/or in order to obtain a highercertain level of reimbursement price.for one or more of our products. In these situations, we intend to complete the required clinical studies to obtain reimbursement approval in countries where it makes economic sense to do so.

 

Intellectual Property

 

Patents

 

We have twenty-eight52 issued patents, including 14 patents issued in the U.S., and seven pending patent applications, twelvefour of which are pending in the United States , manyStates. Many of whichthese patents and applications cover aspects of our CGuard and MGuard and CGuard technology. Some of the corresponding patent applicationsPatents outside the U.S. arehave been filed in Canada, China, Europe, Israel, India, Japan, Australia, and South Africa. We hold an aggregate total of 50The patents and pending applications including six issued U.S. patents. Thesefall into a number of patent rights are directed to cover the following eight (8) patent families:families, as listed below:

 

Base Title of Patent Family 

Pending patent
applications

Country Pending(Countries)

 

Issued patents

Country/(Country and Patent No.)

 Issue Date
Bifurcated Stent AssembliesUS 8,961,586
China ZL200780046676.2
02/24/2015
9/26/2012
Deformable Tip for Stent Delivery and Methods of UseUS 10,258,491
Israel 260,945
4/16/2019
07/01/2020
       
Bifurcated Stent AssembliesIndiaIsrael 198,1885/1/2014
China ZL200780046676.29/26/2012
Deformable Tip for Stent Delivery and MethodsVisualization of UseUS
PCT/WIPO
In Vivo Filter AssemblyUSCanada 2,666,7123/31/2015
IndiaCanada 2,881,55710/11/2016
Europe (EPO)US 8,043,32310/25/2011
US 9,132,2619/15/2015
Israel 198,1892/1/2014
China ZL200780046659.96/13/2012
China ZL201210119132.76/24/2015
Knitted Stent JacketsCanadaCanada 2,666,7286/23/2015
USChina ZL200780046697.410/10/2012
China ZL201210320950.312/2/2015
Israel 198,1902/1/2014
Optimized Stent JacketIsraelChina ZL201210454357.812/9/2015
Europe (EPO)China ZL200780043259.21/2/2013
CanadaIsrael 198,6655/28/2014
IndiaUS 9,132,0039/15/2015
IsraelUS 9,526,64412/27/2016
blood flow in a venous/arterial shunting system US    
       
In Vivo Filter AssemblyUS 9,132,26109/15/2015
Filter AssembliesIsrael 198,1892/1/2014
Knitted Stent JacketsCanada 2,666,728
Canada 2,887,189
China ZL200780046697.4
China ZL201210320950.3
Israel 198,190
EP 2076212
(Germany, France, & UK)
US 10,137,015
6/23/2015
5/1/2018
10/10/2012
12/2/2015
2/1/2014
3/29/2017

11/27/2018
India 32379210/28/2019
Optimized Stent JacketCanada
EPO
US
Canada 2,670,724
China ZL201210454357.8
China ZL200780043259.2
India 297,257
Israel 230,922
US 9,132,003
US 9,526,644
US 9,782,281
US 10,070,976
US 10,406,006
US 10,406,008
EP 2088962
(validated in 9 countries: BE, CH, DE, FR, UK, IT, IE, LX, NL)
12/11/2018
12/9/2015
1/2/2013
5/30/2018
10/01/2020
9/15/2015
12/27/2016
10/10/2017
9/11/2018
9/10/2019
9/10/2019
10/11/2017
Stent Apparatuses for Treatment Via Body Lumens and Methods of Use US
EPO
 South Africa 2007/10751
Canada 2,609,687
Canada 2,843,097
EP 1885281
(CH, DE, FR, GB, IE, IT)
US 10,058,440
US 10,070,977
 10/27/2010
IsraelCanada 2609687
4/22/2015
Europe (EPO)Canada 2,843,097
10/27/2015
US 8,961,586
2/24/2015
13/2019
3/1/2017
8/28/2018
9/11/2018
Stent Thermoforming Apparatus and Methods JP 6553178
US 9,527,234
US 10,376,393
Australia 2015326517
Canada 2962713
7/12/2019
12/27/2016
8/13/2019
05/21/2020
02/19/2019
Methods or using a self-adjusting stent assembly and kits including the same US 9,527,23412/27/2016
PCT/WIPO
PCT
    
Stent with Sheath

The patents and Metal Wire RetainerUS

In lay terms, these patent applications generallylisted above cover threevarious aspects of our products:products, specifically focusing on the mesh sleeve withcovering our stents, as well as methods for production and without a drug, the product and the delivery mechanismmechanisms of the stent.stents. We also believe that one or more additional pending patent applications, upon issuance, will cover our existing products. We also believe that the patent applications we have filed,patents, in particular those covering the use of a knitted micron-level mesh sleeve over a stent for various indications, ifas well as our pending patent applications (if issued as patents with claims substantially in their present form, would likelyform), create a significant barrier for another companyagainst other companies seeking to use similar technology. We believe these patents and patent applications collectively cover all our existing products and may be useful in protecting our future technological developments. We intend to aggressively continue patenting new technologies and to actively pursue any infringement of our key patents.

 60

 

TrademarksTrade Secrets

 

We usealso rely on trade secret protection to protect our interests in proprietary know-how and/or for processes for which patents are difficult to obtain or enforce. As part of our trade secret policy, we rely on non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants and other parties to protect trade secrets and other proprietary technology.

Trademarks

We have registered or applied to register the InspireMD®, MGuard®, CGuard®, and MGuard Prime®following trademarks, which we use in connection with our products. We have registered these trademarks in the European Union. products:

InspireMD® (US, European Union, and UK)
MGuard® (European Union, and UK)
CGuard® (US, European Union, and UK)
MGuard Prime® (US, European Union, and UK)
NGuard® US, European Union)
PVGuard® (US, European Union, and UK)
Micronet® )US(
MNP Micronet Protection logo )European Union and UK)
Carenet® )European Union and UK)
SmartFit™ (US)

The trademarks are renewable indefinitely, so long as we continue using the marks and make the appropriate filings when required. We also have registrations for Carenet®, NGuard® and the MNP Micronet Protection Logo in the European Union and a supplemental registration for Micronet® in the United States. We have also applied to register the names PVGuard™ as a trademark in the European Union, as well as Carenet™, CGuard™ InspireMD™, SmartFit™, PVGuardTM, NGuardTM, AGuardTM, and MGuard Prime™ as trademarks in the United States. We also use and may have common lawcommon-law rights to various trademarks, trade names, and service marks.

 

Government Regulation

 

The manufacture and sale of our products are subject to regulation by numerous governmental authorities, principally the European Union CE mark and other corresponding foreign agencies.

 

Sales of medical devices outside the United States are subject to foreign regulatory requirements that vary widely from country to country. These laws and regulations range from simple product registration requirements in some countries to complex clearance,approval process, clinical trials and production controls in others. As a result, the processes and time periods required to obtain foreign marketing approval may be longer or shorter than those necessary to obtain U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationFDA market authorization. These differences may affect the efficiency and timeliness of international market introduction of our products. For the European Union nations, medical devices must obtain a CE mark before they may be placed on the market. In order to obtain and maintain the CE mark, we must comply with the Medical Device Directive 93/42/EEC (“MDD”) by presenting comprehensive technical files for our products demonstrating safety and efficacy of the product to be placed on the market and passing initial and annual quality management system audit as per ISO 13485 standard by an European Notified Body. We have obtained ISO 13485 quality system certification and the products we currently distribute into the European Union display the required CE mark. In order to maintain certification, we are required to pass an annual facilitiessurveillance audit inspections conducted by European Notified Body inspectors.auditors. The European Union replaced the MDD with the new European Medical Devices Regulation, or MDR (MDR 2017/745). The MDR will apply after a transitional period of three years ending on May 26, 2020, which is expected to change several aspects of the existing regulatory framework in Europe. Manufacturers have the duration of the transition period to update their technical documentation and processes to meet the new requirements in order to obtain a CE Mark. After May 26, 2020, medical devices can still be placed on the market under the provision of the MDD until May 27, 2024; provided the CE Mark was issued prior to this date and the manufacturer continues to comply with this directive. By May 27, 2024, all medical devices entering the EU will need to have a CE Mark under the MDR, even if they have been on the market previously under the MDD. In our case, CGuard and MGuard can continue to be marketed under the MDD until November 12, 2022. Specifically, the EU MDR will require changes in the clinical evidence required for medical devices, post-market clinical follow-up evidence, annual reporting of safety information for Class III products, Unique Device Identification (“UDI”) for all products, submission of core data elements to a European UDI database prior to placement of a device on the market, and multiple other labeling changes. Approvals for certain of our currently-marketed products could be curtailed or withdrawn as a result of the implementation and recertification process of the EU MDR and acquiring approvals for new products could be more challenging, time consuming and costly.

 

As noted below, we have or had regulatory approval and have made sales of CGuard EPS, MGuard Prime EPS, CGuard EPS or both products either through distributors pursuant to distribution agreements or directly, in the following countries: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Ecuador, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Malta, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey Vietnam and the United Kingdom. We have temporary regulatory approval to sell MGuard Prime EPS in Malaysia while we are in the registration process due to a regulatory change in November 2015.Kingdom In addition, we have distribution agreements for our products in Uzbekistan, Canada, Venezuela, and Armenia, although we have not yet obtained regulatory approval to sell our products in those countries, and we are awaiting regulatory approval to sell our products in India and Brazil (for CGuard EPS).Taiwan. While each of the European Union member countries accepts the CE mark as its sole requirement for marketing approval, some of these countries still require us to take additional steps in order to gain reimbursement rights for our products. Furthermore, while we believe that certain of the above-listed countries that are not members of the European Union accept the CE mark as a primary requirement for marketing approval, each such country requires additional regulatory requirements for final marketing approval of our products. Furthermore, we are currently targeting additional countries in Europe, Asia, and Latin America, however, even if all governmental regulatory requirements are satisfied in each such country, we anticipate that obtaining marketing approval in each country could take as few as three months or as many as twelve months or more, due to the nature of the approval process in each individual country, including typical wait times for application processing and review, as discussed in greater detail below.

In October 2007, our first generation MGuard stent combining the MicroNet with a stainless steel stent received CE mark approval for the treatment of coronary artery disease in the European Union. We subsequently replaced the first generation MGuard product with MGuard Prime EPS, which uses a more advanced cobalt-chromium based stent. Our MGuard Prime EPS received CE mark approval in the European Union in October 2010 and marketing approval in those countries listed in the table below. We are focused on seeking marketing approval in these countries because we believe that these countries represent the strongest opportunities for us to grow with respect to our sales.

The CGuard EPS received CE mark approval in the European Union on March 14, 2013 and marketing approval in thosethe countries listed in the table below. We are currently seeking marketing approval for CGuard EPS in, BrazilSouth Korea and India.Taiwan.

 

Please refer to the table below setting forth the approvals and sales made for CGuard EPS and the MGuard Prime EPS on a country-by-country basis.

 

Approvals and Sales of MGuard Prime EPS and CGuard EPS on a Country-by-Country Basis

 

Countries

MGuard Prime

EPS Approval

MGuard Prime

EPS Sales

CGuard EPS

Approval

 CGuard EPS ApprovalCGuard EPS SalesMGuard Prime
EPS Approval
MGuard Prime EPS Sales 
Argentina Y Y Y Y
ArmeniaNNNN 
Australia Y Y N NY(1)
Austria Y Y Y Y 
Belarus Y Y Y Y 
Belgium Y 

N

Y Y Y 
Brazil Y Y NY NY 
Bulgaria 

Y

 

N

Y
 

Y

 

Y

 
ChileYY N Y(1)YY(1)(3)
Colombia Y Y Y Y 
Croatia Y YN Y NY 
Cyprus Y Y Y Y 
Czech Republic Y Y Y Y 
Denmark Y YYN(4)
Dominican RepublicYYYY
EcuadorYY Y Y 
Estonia Y Y Y NY 
Finland Y Y Y Y 
France Y Y Y Y 
Germany Y Y Y Y 
Greece Y NY Y N(4)
Holland (Netherlands)Netherlands Y Y YY
Hong Kong Y YNN 
Hungary Y Y Y Y 
Iceland Y N Y N 
India Y NY N N 
Ireland Y Y Y NY 
Israel Y Y Y Y 
Italy Y Y Y Y
KazakhstanNNNN 
Latvia Y Y Y Y 
Lithuania Y Y Y Y 
Liechtenstein Y N Y N 
LuxemburgLuxembourg Y N Y Y N
MalaysiaY(2)Y N N NY(4)
Malta Y YN Y NY 
Mexico Y Y YY
MontenegroYNYN
New ZealandYN N N 
Norway Y NY Y
PeruYY Y N 
Poland Y Y Y Y 
Portugal Y NY Y YN 
Romania Y Y Y Y 
Russia Y Y Y Y
Saudi Arabia N NNY(5)
Saudi ArabiaSerbia Y Y NN
SerbiaYNN N 
Slovakia Y Y Y Y 
Slovenia Y Y Y Y 
South Africa Y(3)Y YN(6)NY 
Spain Y Y Y Y 
Sweden Y Y Y NY 
Switzerland Y Y Y Y
TurkeyYYYY
VenezuelaNNN N 
TaiwanVietnam Y NY YY
UkraineYY N N 
United Kingdom Y Y Y Y 
UzbekistanNNNN
VenezuelaNNNN

(1)We have made salesThe approval expired and per management decision it was decided not to distributors in this country, but based upon information from such distributors, we believe that the product has not been sold to customers in this country.renew it.
  
(2)

Due toThe license has expired and the changes made to the relevant regulations in Malaysia that became effective in November 2015, we are required to register our product. On November 29, 2015, we initiated the registrationlicense renewal process required pursuant to the amended regulation. We have temporary authorization to sell and market MGuard Prime EPS in Malaysia pending a final determination of our application for registration based on a regulatory exemption covering applications for registration submitted between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016.

is currently underway.
  
(3)Chile is a non-regulated market, the health system in Chile only relies on CE mark or FDA certificates.
(4)The approval expired and per management decision it was decided not to renew it.
(5)The approval expired in November 2017. We believe that we have not had sales of MGuard Prime EPS in Saudi Arabia since 2014.
(6)The certificate evidencing regulatory approval for MGuard Prime EPS in South Africa based upon information from our former distributor in such country, who was responsible for obtaining the regulatory approval for MGuard Prime EPS. However, the certificate evidencing regulatory approval was held by our former distributor in South Africa, and we cannot guarantee that it is in full force and effect. Our distribution agreement with the distributor in South Africa expired pursuant to the terms of such distribution agreement on February 1, 2015, and we have not had sales of MGuard Prime EPS in South Africa since 2015.

In the United States, the medical devices that we will manufacture and sell in the future

FDA Government Regulation of Medical Devices for Human Subjects

Many of our activities are subject to extensive and rigorous regulationregulatory oversight by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration pursuant toFDA under provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and regulations promulgatedthereunder, including regulations governing the development, marketing, labeling, promotion, manufacturing, and administeredexport of medical devices.

FDA Approval/Clearance Requirements

In the United States, Class II or III medical devices must be cleared or approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act,FDA prior to commercialization. Unless an exemption applies, each medical device that we market or wish to market in the United States must receive U.S. Food and Drug Administration510(k) clearance or premarket approval. Medical devices that receive 510(k) clearance are “cleared” by the FDA to market, distribute, and sell in the United States. Medical devices that obtain a premarket approval by the FDA are “approved” to market, distribute, and sell in the United States. We anticipate filing a premarket approval application in the future and do not anticipate filing a 510(k) premarket notification. Even though we do not anticipate filing a 510(k), we cannot be certain that the FDA will find it more appropriate for us to file a 510(k) premarket notification instead of a premarket approval application. Further, we cannot be sure that we will ever obtain premarket approval. Descriptions of the premarket approval and 510(k) clearance processes are provided below.

Class I devices are those for which safety and effectiveness can be assured by adherence to the FDA’s general regulatory controls for medical devices, or the General Controls, which include compliance with the applicable portions of the FDA’s quality system regulations, facility registration and product listing, reporting of adverse medical events, and appropriate, truthful and non-misleading labeling, advertising, and promotional materials. Some Class I devices also require premarket clearance by the FDA through the 510(k) process described below.

Class II devices are subject to the FDA’s General Controls, and any other special controls as deemed necessary by the FDA to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device. Premarket review and clearance by the FDA for Class II devices is accomplished through the 510(k) process. Pursuant to the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002 (MDUFMA), as of October 2002, unless a specific exemption applies, 510(k) submissions are subject to user fees. Certain Class II devices are exempt from this premarket review process. The FDA has recently indicated that it intends to modernize the 510(k) process and has issued new guidance documents that may change the way that devices are cleared by the FDA.

Class III includes devices with the greatest risk. Devices in this class must meet all of the requirements in Classes I and II. In addition, Class III devices cannot generally be marketed until they receive a premarket approval. The safety and effectiveness of Class III devices cannot be assured solely by the General Controls and the other requirements described above. These devices require formal clinical studies to demonstrate safety and effectiveness. Under MDFUMA, premarket approval applications (and supplemental premarket approval applications) are subject to significantly higher user fees than 510(k) applications, and they also require considerably more time and resources.

The FDA decides whether a device line must undergo either the 510(k) clearance or premarket approval based on statutory criteria that utilize a risk-based classification system. Premarket approval is the FDA process of scientific and regulatory review to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Class III medical devices and, in many cases, Class II medical devices. Class III devices are those that support or sustain human life, are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, or which present a potential, unreasonable risk of illness or injury. The FDA uses these criteria to decide whether a premarket approval or a 510(k) is appropriate, including the level of risk that the agency perceives is associated with the device and a determination by the agency of whether the product is a type of device that is similar to devices that are already legally marketed. Devices deemed to pose relatively less risk are placed in either Class I or II. In many cases, the FDA requires the manufacturer to submit a 510(k) requesting clearance (also referred to as a premarket notification), unless an exemption from such clearanceapplies. The 510(k) must demonstrate that the manufacturer’s proposed device is “substantially equivalent” in intended use and in safety and effectiveness to a legally marketed predicate device. A “predicate device” is a pre-existing medical device to which equivalence can be drawn, that is either in Class I, Class II, or is a Class III device that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, for which the FDA has not yet called for submission of a premarket approval before we can market such device commercially in the U.S.application.

 

We expect that unless an exemption applies, each medical device that we market or wish to market in the United States must receive 510(k) clearance or premarket approval. Medical devices that receive 510(k) clearance are “cleared” by the FDA to market, distribute, and sell in the United States. Medical devices that obtain a premarket approval by the FDA are “approved” to market, distribute, and sell in the United States. We anticipate that each device that we wish to commercialize will be considered a Class III device by the FDA and therefore we anticipate filing a premarket approval application in the future and do not anticipate filing a 510(k) premarket notification. Even though we do not anticipate filing a 510(k), we cannot be certain that the FDA will find it more appropriate for us to file a 510(k) premarket notification instead of a premarket approval application or that applications of our technology may not be considered Class II devices. Further, we cannot be sure that we will ever obtain a premarket approval. Descriptions of the premarket approval and 510(k) clearance processes are provided below.

Premarket Approval Pathway

We expect that current and future applications of our technology will result in medical devices that are considered Class III devices subject to premarket approval. A premarket approval application must be submitted if a device cannot be cleared through the 510(k) process. A premarket approval application must be supported by extensive data including, but not limited to, analytical, preclinical, clinical trials, manufacturing, statutory preapproval inspections, and labeling to demonstrate to the FDA’s satisfaction the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use. Before a premarket approval application is submitted, a manufacturer must apply for an IDE. If the device presents a “significant risk,” as defined by the FDA, to human health, the FDA requires the device sponsor to file an IDE application with the FDA and obtain IDE approval prior to initiation of enrollment of human subjects for clinical trials. The IDE provides the manufacturer with a legal pathway to perform clinical trials on human subjects where without the IDE, only approved medical devices may be used on human subjects.

The IDE application must be supported by appropriate data, such as analytical, animal and laboratory testing results, manufacturing information, and an Investigational Review Board (IRB) approved protocol showing that it is safe to test the device in humans and that the testing protocol is scientifically sound. If the clinical trial design is deemed to have “non-significant risk,” the clinical trial may be eligible for “abbreviated” IDE requirements.

A clinical trial may be suspended by either the FDA or the IRB at any time for various reasons, including a belief that the risks to the study participants outweigh the benefits of participation in the study. Even if a study is completed, clinical testing results may not demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the device, or they may be equivocal or otherwise insufficient to obtain approval of the product being tested. After the clinical trials have been completed, if at all, and the clinical trial data and results are collected and organized, a manufacturer may complete a premarket approval application.

After a premarket approval application is sufficiently complete, the FDA will accept the application and begin an in-depth review of the submitted information. By statute, the FDA has 180 days to review the “accepted application,” although, generally, review of the application can take between one and three years, but it may take significantly longer. During this review period, the FDA may request additional information or clarification of information already provided. Also, during the review period, an advisory panel of experts from outside the FDA may be convened to review and evaluate the application and provide recommendations to the FDA as to the approvability of the device. The preapproval inspections conducted by the FDA include an evaluation of the manufacturing facility to ensure compliance with the Quality Systems Regulations, as well as inspections of the clinical trial sites by the Bioresearch Monitoring group to evaluate compliance with good clinical practice and human subject protections. New premarket approval applications or premarket approval supplements are required for modifications that affect the safety or effectiveness of the device, including, for example, certain types of modifications to the device’s indication for use, manufacturing process, labeling and design. Significant changes to an approved premarket approval require a 180-day supplement, whereas less substantive changes may utilize a 30-day notice, or a 135-day supplement. Premarket approval supplements often require submission of the same type of information as a premarket approval application, except that the supplement is limited to information needed to support any changes from the device covered by the original premarket approval application, and it may not require as extensive clinical data or the convening of an advisory panel.

510(k) Clearance Pathway

We do not currently market, distribute, or sell any products that have market clearance by the FDA under its 510(k) process. If, in the future, we develop products where 510(k) clearance is required, we would be required to submit a 510(k) demonstrating that such proposed devices are substantially equivalent to a respective previously cleared 510(k) device or a device that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, for which the FDA has not yet called for the submission of 510(k). The FDA’s 510(k) clearance pathway usually takes from three to twelve months but could take longer. In some cases, the FDA may require additional information, including clinical data, to make a determination regarding substantial equivalence.

If a device receives 510(k) clearance, any modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a new or major change in its intended use, will require a new 510(k) clearance or, depending on the modification, a premarket approval. The FDA requires each device manufacturer to determine whether the proposed change requires submission of a new 510(k) or a premarket approval, but the FDA can review any such decision and can disagree with a manufacturer’s determination. If the FDA disagrees with a manufacturer’s determination, the FDA can require the manufacturer to cease marketing and/or recall the modified device until 510(k) clearance or premarket approval of the modified device is obtained.

Pervasive and Continuing FDA Regulation

A host of regulatory requirements apply to our approved devices, including the quality system regulation (which requires manufacturers to follow elaborate design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures), the Medical Device Reporting regulations (which require that manufacturers report to the FDA specified types of adverse events involving their products), labeling regulations, and the FDA’s general prohibition against promoting products for unapproved or “off-label” uses. Class II devices also can have special controls such as performance standards, post-market surveillance, patient registries, and FDA guidelines that do not apply to Class I devices.

A noncomprehensive list of the regulatory requirements that apply to our approved products classified as medical devices include:

product listing and establishment registration, which helps facilitate FDA inspections and other regulatory action;
Quality Systems Regulations, which requires manufacturers, including third-party manufacturers, to follow stringent design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures during all aspects of the development and manufacturing process;
labeling regulations and FDA prohibitions against the promotion of products for uncleared, unapproved or off-label use or indication;
clearance of product modifications that could significantly affect safety or efficacy or that would constitute a major change in intended use of one of our cleared devices;

approval of product modifications that affect the safety or effectiveness of one of our cleared devices;
medical device reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers comply with FDA requirements to report if their device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury, or has malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction of the device or a similar device were to recur;
post-approval restrictions or conditions, including post-approval study commitments;
post-market surveillance regulations, which apply when necessary to protect the public health or to provide additional safety and effectiveness data for the device;
the FDA’s recall authority, whereby it can ask, or under certain conditions order, device manufacturers to recall from the market a product that is in violation of governing laws and regulations;
regulations pertaining to voluntary recalls; and,
notices of corrections or removals.

We do not currently have a registered establishment with the FDA. If we are approved or cleared to manufacture, prepare, or process a device in the United States, we and any third-party manufacturers that we may use must will be required to register our establishments with the FDA. As such, we and our manufacturing facilities will be subject to FDA inspections for compliance with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation. Additionally, some of our subcontractors may also be subject to FDA announced and unannounced inspections for compliance with the FDA’s Quality System Regulation. These regulations will require that we manufacture our products and maintain our documents in a prescribed manner with respect to design, manufacturing, testing and quality control activities. As a medical device manufacturer, we will further be required to comply with FDA requirements regarding the reporting of adverse events associated with the use of our medical devices, as well as product malfunctions that would likely cause or contribute to death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. FDA regulations also govern product labeling and prohibit a manufacturer from marketing a medical device for unapproved applications.

Our CGuard EPS will beis classified as a Class III medical device by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.FDA. Class III medical devices are generally the highest risk devices and are therefore subject to the highest level of regulatory control by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,FDA, since the U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationFDA process of premarket approval involves scientific and regulatory review to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Class III medical devices for the purpose(s) intended. The U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationFDA will either approve or deny a premarket approval application and we cannot market a device unless or until the U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationFDA approves a premarket approval application.

 

We expect the approval process in the U.S. to take a significant amount of time, require the expenditure of significant resources, involve rigorous clinical investigations and testing, and potentially require changes to products. The approval process may result in limitations on the indicated uses of the medical devices for which we are able to obtain approval (since the U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationFDA can take action against a company that promotes off-label uses) and will also require increased post-market surveillance.

 

The U.S. FoodHealthcare Laws and Drug Administration’s regulations covering medical devices also regulate labeling, reporting of certain events (such as adverse events, corrections and removals), manufacturing practices (including extensive the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s extensive Quality System Regulation), device tracking and identification.Regulations

 

We will also be requiredIn addition to register with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration asFDA regulations, there are a medical device manufacturer. As such, our manufacturing facilities will be subject to U.S. Food and Drug Administration inspections for compliance with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Quality System Regulation. Additionally, somevariety of our subcontractors may also be subject to U.S. Food and Drug Administration inspections for compliance with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Quality System Regulation. These regulations will require that we manufacture our products and maintain our documents in a prescribed manner with respect to design, manufacturing, testing and quality control activities. As a medical device manufacturer, we will further be required to comply with U.S. Food and Drug Administration requirements regarding the reporting of adverse events associated with the use of our medical devices, as well as product malfunctions that would likely cause or contribute to death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations also govern product labeling and prohibit a manufacturer from marketing a medical device for unapproved applications.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration actively monitors compliance withother healthcare laws and regulations through its reviewto which we may be subject if any of our products are marketed, sold, distributed, and/or utilized in the United States. Of specific note are federal and inspectionstate fraud and abuse laws, which prohibit the payment or receipt of designkickbacks, bribes or other remuneration, including the offer or solicitation of such payment, intended to induce or reward the purchase, recommendation or generation of business involving healthcare products any item or service payable by a health-care program. Other provisions of federal and manufacturing practices, recordkeeping,state laws prohibit presenting, or causing to be presented, to third party payors (including, government program, such as Medicare and Medicaid) for reimbursement, claims that are false or fraudulent, or which are for items or services that were not provided as claimed. In addition, other healthcare laws and regulations may apply, such as transparency and reporting requirements, and privacy and security requirements. Violations of these laws can lead to civil and criminal penalties, including exclusion from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, any of which could have a material adverse events, labeling and promotional practices. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration can ban certain medical devices; detain or seize adulterated or misbrandedeffect on our business. These laws are potentially applicable to manufacturers of products regulated by the FDA as medical devices, (that is, medical devices that do not comply with the Federal Food, Drug,such as us, and Cosmetic Act, including as implemented through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s regulations); order repair, replacement or refund of these devices; and require notification of health professionals and others with regard to medical devices that present unreasonable risks of substantial harm to the public health. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration may also enjoin and restrain a company for certain violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Acthospitals, physicians and other amendinginstitutional or individual providers that may refer or purchase such products. The healthcare laws pertaining to medical devices, or initiate action for criminal prosecution of such violations. Any adverse regulatory action, depending on its magnitude,that may restrict us from effectively marketing and selling our products, may limit our ability to obtain premarket approvals, and could result in a substantial modificationbe applicable to our business practices and operations.or operations include, but are not limited to:

The federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits the offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration in return for referring, ordering, leasing, purchasing or arranging for, or recommending the ordering, purchasing or leasing of, items or services payable by Medicare, Medicaid or any other federal healthcare program;
Federal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws, including the False Claims Act, that prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other government healthcare programs that are false or fraudulent, or making a false statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money to the federal government;
The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), which includes provisions that prohibit knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, any healthcare benefit program, and for knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false statements in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services;
HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, and its implementing regulations, also imposes obligations and requirements on healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses as well as their respective business associates that perform certain services for them that involve the use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information, with respect to safeguarding the privacy and security of certain individually identifiable health information;
The federal transparency requirements under the Affordable Care Act, including the provision commonly referred to as the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies that are reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or Children’s Health Insurance Program to report annually to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals, and ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members; and
Analogous state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws, which may be broader in scope and apply to referrals and items or services reimbursed by both governmental and non-governmental third-party payors, including private insurers, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by federal law, thus complicating compliance efforts.

 

Customers

 

Our customer base is varied. We began shipping our product to customers in Europe in January 2008 and have since expanded our global distribution network to Southeast Asia, India, Latin America and Israel. We currently have distribution agreements for our CE mark-approved MGuard Prime EPS and/or CGuard EPS with medical product distributors based in Europe, the Middle East, Asia Pacific Australia and Latin America. We are currently in discussions with additional distribution companies in Europe, Asia, and Latin America.

For the twelve months ended December 31 , 2016, 85% of our revenue was generated in Europe, and 9% of our revenue was generated in Latin America, with the remaining 6% of our revenue generated in the rest of the world. Our major customers in the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, were Penumbra, Inc., a distributor in Europe that accounted for 28% of our revenues, and Crossmed S.r.l., a distributor in Italy that accounted for 13% of our revenues.

 

Most of our current agreements with our distributors stipulate that, and we expect our future agreements with our distributors to stipulate that, while we shall assist in training by providing training materials, marketing guidance, marketing materials, and technical guidance, each distributor will be responsible for carrying out local registration, sales and marketing activities. In addition, in most cases, all sales costs, including sales representatives, incentive programs, and marketing trials, will be borne by the distributor. Under current agreements, distributors purchase stents from us at a fixed price. Our current agreements with distributors are generally for a term of two to three years.

 

Manufacturing and Suppliers

 

The polymer fiber for MicroNet is supplied by Biogeneral, Inc., a San Diego, California-based specialty polymer manufacturer for medical and engineering applications.

 

Natec Medical Ltd. supplies us with catheters that help create the base for our CGuard EPS stents. Our agreement with Natec Medical Ltd., as amended, may be terminated by us upon eight months’ notice. We have also agreed to participate in certain startup cost incurred byOn August 1, 2017, we amended the agreement with Natec Medical Ltd. in an aggregate total amount, so that we are responsible for purchasing and handling inventory of 52,000 Euros.CGuard EPS delivery system, and Natec Medical Ltd.is responsible for the manufacturing process.

 

Natec Medical Ltd. supplies us with catheters that help create the base for our MGuard Prime EPS. Our agreement with Natec Medical Ltd., which may be terminated by either party upon six months’ notice, calls for non-binding minimum orders.

 

The cobalt-chromium stent for our MGuard Prime EPS was designed by Svelte Medical Systems Inc. We have an agreement with Svelte Medical Systems Inc., as amended, that grants us a non-exclusive, worldwide license for production and use of the MGuard Prime cobalt-chromium stent for the life of the stent’s patent, subject to the earlier termination of the agreement upon the bankruptcy of either party or the uncured default by either party under any material provision of the agreement. Our royalty payments to Svelte Medical Systems Inc. are determined by the sales volume of MGuard Prime EPS. Currently, the royalty rate is 2.9% of all net sales. We have mutual indemnification obligations with Svelte Medical Systems Inc. for any damages suffered as a result of third party actions based upon breaches of representations and warranties or the failure to perform certain covenants in the license agreement, and Svelte Medical Systems Inc. will also indemnify us for any damages suffered as a result of third party actions based upon intellectual property or design claims against the cobalt-chromium stent for the MGuard Prime EPS.

 

We manufacture our CGuard EPS and MGuard Prime EPS at our own facility. The bare-metal cobalt-chromium stents for our MGuard Prime EPS and the self-expanding bare-metal stents for our CGuard EPS are being manufactured and supplied by MeKo Laserstrahl-Materialbearbeitung. Our agreement with MeKo Laserstrahl-Materialbearbeitung for the production of electro polished L605 bare-metal stents for MGuard Prime EPS and CGuard EPS is priced on a per-stent basis, subject to the quantity of stents ordered. The complete assembly process for MGuard Prime EPS and CGuard EPS, including knitting and securing the sleeve to the stent and the crimping of the sleeve stent on to a delivery catheter, is done at our Israel manufacturing site. Once MGuard Prime EPS and CGuard EPS have been assembled, they are sent for sterilization in Germany,a third-party facility in Israel, and then back to Israelour facility for final packaging and distribution.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2019, our former third-party sterilizer’s equipment failures resulted in significant interruption in sterilized product supply for the majority of the quarter. As a result of this interruption in the delivery of sterilized products and our limited inventory levels on hand prior to this interruption, we were unable to fulfill a significant portion of the orders received during the three months ended March 31, 2019.

 

Each MGuard stent is manufactured from two main components, the stent and the mesh polymer. The stent is made out of cobalt chromium. This material is readily available, and we acquire it in the open market. The mesh is made from polyethylene terephthalate (polyester). This material is readily available in the market as well, because it is used for many medical applications. In the event that our supplier can no longer supply this material in fiber form, we would need to qualify another supplier, which could take several months. In addition, in order to retain the approval of the CE mark, we are required to perform periodic audits of the quality control systems of our key suppliers in order to insure that their products meet our predetermined specifications.

 

 64

A CGuard EPS consists of a CGuard stent and the delivery system. Each CGuard stent is manufactured from two main components, a self-expending nickel -titaniumnickel-titanium stent and the mesh polymer. This material is readily available and we acquire it in the open market. The mesh is made from polyethylene terephthalate (polyester). We have pending patent rights that cover the proposed CGuard stent with mesh. This material is readily available in the market as well, because it is used for many medical applications. In the event that our supplier can no longer supply this material in fiber form, we would need to qualify another supplier, which could take several months. The delivery system for CGuard is made out of polymer tubes we acquire from an original equipment manufacturer. In the event that our supplier can no longer supply this material, we would need to qualify another supplier, which could take several months. In addition, in order to retain the approval of the CE mark, we are required to perform periodic audits of the quality control systems of our key suppliers in order to insure that their products meet our predetermined specifications.

 

Employees

As of February 15 , 2017, we had 34 full-time employees. Except for one of our employees in Europe, our employees are not party to any collective bargaining agreements. We do not expect the collective bargaining agreements to which our employees are party to have a material effect on our business or results of operations. We consider our relations with our employees to be good. We believe that our future success will depend, in part, on our continued ability to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel.

Properties

 

Our headquarters are located in Tel Aviv, Israel, where we lease a 1,000 square meter office and manufacturing facility that has the capacity to manufacture and assemble 4,8001,200 stents per month, based upon the production schedule of one shift per day. We believe that our current facility is sufficient to meet anticipated future demand by adding additional shifts to our current production schedule.

 

We also lease approximately 1,580 square feet of executive office space in Boston, Massachusetts, which we plan to vacate upon termination of the lease in near future.

Legal Proceedings

 

From time to time, we may be involved in litigation that arises through the normal course of business.

 

On April 26, 2016, Microbanc, LLC and Todd Spenla of Microbanc, LLC filed suit in the New York State Supreme Court (New York County) against us asserting claims for breach of agreement, quantum meruit, unjust enrichment and fraud and seeking approximately $2.2 million and 9% of the amount of stock and warrants sold in 2011 and 2012 in alleged damages relating to certain alleged finders’ fees that they claim are owed. We have removed the suit to federal court and filed a motion to dismiss all claims on June 30, 2016. The motion was noticed for July 28, 2016, but no decision has been rendered. The court held a conference for February 15 , 2017 , which was adjourned . We intend to contest the matter vigorously. Due to the uncertainties of litigation, however, we can give no assurance that we will prevail on any claims made against us in any such lawsuit. Also, we can give no assurance that any other lawsuits or claims brought in the future will not have an adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or operating results.

On July 12, 2016, Medpace Inc.10, 2019, Bosti Trading Ltd., a former service provider,distributor in Russia (“Bosti”), filed suit with the Tel Aviv-Jaffa District Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County, Ohio,in Israel, or the Complaint, against us asserting that we breached a master services agreement with Medpace Inc.InspireMD Ltd., claiming damages for alleged breaches by failing to pay Medpace Inc. certain fees purportedly owed to itInspireMD Ltd. under the Distribution Agreement, dated May 26, 2011, between Bosti and InspireMD Ltd., in connection with Medpace Inc.’s provisionthe voluntary field corrective action of certain clinical development program servicesour MGuard Prime EPS we initiated in 2014. Bosti claimed that Bosti and its Russian subsidiary returned 1,830 units of MGuard Prime EPS to InspireInspireMD Ltd. We have removedupon initiation of the suitvoluntary filed action, and, since the Russian Ministry of Health prohibited distribution of MGuard Prime EPS on August 28, 2014, and did not approve distribution MGuard Prime EPS until September 20, 2016, Bosti was entitled to recover from InspireMD Ltd. €1,830,000 (which is approximately $2 million), the U.S. District Courtamount Bosti was due to receive from its Russian subsidiary, or alternatively, €1,024,000 (which is approximately $1.1 million), the amount Bosti paid to InspireMD Ltd., for the Southern DistrictMGuard Prime EPS returned to InspireMD Ltd. On January 31, 2020 InspireMD Ltd. filed with court its letter of Ohio. Since removal, Medpace Inc. has amended its complaint to namedefense in which it contested this matter vigorously. In January 2021, we executed a Mediation Agreement with Bosti and InspireMD Ltd., our wholly owned subsidiary, aspursuant to which Bosti will agree to release the only defendant. Medpace Inc. is seeking $1,967,822 in damages plus interest, costs, attorneys’ fees and expenses against InspireMD Ltd. InspireMD Ltd. intends to contest this matter vigorously. Due to the uncertainties of litigation, however, we can give no assurance that InspireMD Ltd. will prevail on anyCompany from all claims made against InspireMD Ltd. in any such lawsuit. Also, we can give no assurance that any other lawsuits or claims broughtstated in the future will not have an adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or operating results.

Complaint in exchange for a payment of $580,000.

As of the date of this filing, we are not aware of any other material legal proceedings to which we or any of our subsidiaries is a party or to which any of our property is subject, nor are we aware of any such threatened or pending litigation or any such proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities other than other than the foregoing suits filed by Microbanc, LLC and Todd Spenla and by Medpace Inc.authorities.

 

We are not aware of any material proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates or any registered or beneficial stockholder of more than 5% of our common stock, or any associate of any of the foregoing, is a party adverse to or has a material interest adverse to, us or any of our subsidiaries.

 

Corporate InformationHuman Capital Management

 

As of December 31, 2020, we had 48 employees (45 full-time and 3 part-time), consisting of two in executive management, five in research and development, four in quality assurance and compliance, five in finance and accounting, 18 in operations/production, 11 in sales, marketing and clinical, and three in all other miscellaneous roles, including business development, information technology services, and administration. Except for four of our employees in Europe, our employees are not party to any collective bargaining agreements. We do not expect the collective bargaining agreements to which our employees are party to have a material effect on our business or results of operations. We also employ two independent contractors in Poland.

We believe that our future success will depend, in part, on our continued ability to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel. In particular, we depend on the skills, experience and performance of our senior management and research personnel. We compete for qualified personnel with other medical device, biotechnology, pharmaceutical and healthcare companies, as well as universities and non-profit research institutions.

We provide competitive compensation and benefits programs to help meet the needs of our employees. In addition to salaries, these programs (which vary by country/region and employment classification) include incentive compensation plan, pension, healthcare and insurance benefits, paid time off, family leave, and on-site services, among others. We also use targeted equity-based grants with vesting conditions to facilitate retention of personnel, particularly for our key employees.

The success of our business is fundamentally connected to the well-being of our people. Accordingly, we are committed to the health and safety of our employees. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented significant changes that we determined were organized in the Statebest interest of Delaware on February 29, 2008. Our principal executive office is located at 4 Menorat Hamaor St., Tel Aviv, Israel 6744832 . Our telephone number is (888) 776-6804 . Our website address iswww.inspire-md.com. Information accessed through our website is not incorporated into this prospectusemployees, as well as the communities in which we operate, and is not a part of this prospectus.which comply with government regulations. This includes having employees work from home, while implementing additional safety measures for employees continuing critical on-site work.

We consider our relations with our employees to be good.

MANAGEMENT

 

Executive Officers and Directors

 

The following table sets forth information regarding our executive officers and the members of our board of directors.

 

Name Age Position
James Barry, Ph.D.Marvin Slosman 5756 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Craig Shore 5559 Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
Agustin V. Gago57Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer
Sol J. Barer, Ph.D.(2)(3)69Chairman of the Board of Directors
Isaac Blech67Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors
Michael Berman(1)(2) 5963 Director
Campbell Rogers, M.D. 5559 Director
Paul Stuka(1)(2)(3) 

62

65
 DirectorChairman of the Board of Directors
Thomas J. Kester(1)(3) 7074Director
Gary Roubin, M.D.72 Director

 

(1)Member of our audit committee
  
(2)Member of our nominating and corporate governance committee
  
(3)Member of our compensation committee

Our directors hold office until the earlier of their death, resignation or removal by stockholders or until their successors have been qualified. Our directors are divided into three classes. Sol J. Barer, Ph.D.Paul Stuka and Paul StukaGary Roubin are our Class 1 directors, with their terms of office to expire at our 20182021 annual meeting of stockholders. Michael Berman and Campbell Rogers, M.D. are our Class 2 directors, with their terms of office to expire at our 20192022 annual meeting of stockholders. Isaac Blech, James Barry, Ph.D.Marvin Slosman and Thomas J. Kester are our Class 3 directors, with their terms of office to expire at our 20172023 annual meeting of stockholders. At each annual meeting of stockholders, directors elected to succeed those directors whose terms expire shall be elected for a term of office to expire at the third succeeding annual meeting of stockholders after their election, with each director to hold office until his or her successor shall have been duly elected and qualified.

 

Our officers hold office until the earlier of their death, resignation or removal by our board of directors or until their successors have been selected. They serve at the pleasure of our board of directors.

 

James Barry, Ph.D.Marvin Slosman has served as our president, and chief executive officer since June 6, 2016, and as a director since January 30, 2012. Prior to becoming our president and chief executive officer, Dr. Barry served as our executive vice president and chief operating officer from July 14, 2014. Dr. Barry served as president and chief executive officer and executive vice president anddirector since January 1, 2020. Mr. Slosman has served as chief operating officer for MEDCURA Inc. from May 2019 to December 2019. From September 2017 to September 2019, Mr. Slosman served as a Business Consultant, overseeing international commercial strategy and market development, at ArsenalIntegra Life Sciences, a leading innovator in orthopedic extremity surgery, neurosurgery, and reconstructive and general surgery. From 2010 to 2014 Mr. Slosman served as President of Itamar Medical, Inc., a medical devicetechnology company focused on local therapy, from September 2011 to December 2013. Dr. Barrycardiovascular and sleep diagnostics. Mr. Slosman also heads his own consulting firm, Convergent Biomedical Group LLC, advising medtech companies on product development, strategy, regulatory compliance and fund raising. Until June 2010, he was senior vice president, corporate technology development at Boston Scientific Corporation, where he was in charge of the corporate research and development and pre-clinical science functions and was also a member of the operating committee and corporate portfolio committee. Dr. Barry joined Boston Scientific in 1992 and oversaw its efforts in the identification and development of drug device combinations for both implantable and catheter-based delivery systems. He currently serves on a number of advisory boards including the College of Biomedical Engineering at Yale University, the College of Sciences at University of Massachusetts-Lowell where he is chairman emeritus and the Massachusetts Life Science Center. Dr. Barry also serves as a director of pSivida Corp (NASDAQ: PSDV). Dr. Barry received his Ph.D. in Biochemistry from the University of Massachusetts-Lowell and holds a B.A. degree in Chemistry from Saint Anselm College. Dr. Barry brings to the board over 25 years of experience in leadership roles in the medical device industry and significant medical technology experience, in particular with respect to interventional cardiology products, andserved as chief executive officer Dr. Barry’s positionof Ovalum Vascular Ltd. from 2008 to 2010. Mr. Slosman’s qualifications to serve on the board ensures a unity of vision betweendirectors of the broader goalsCompany include his significant experience in senior management positions of our company and our day-to-day operations.leading medical device companies.

 66

 

Craig Shore has served as our chief financial officer, secretary and treasurer since March 31, 2011 and as our chief administrative officer since May 3, 2013. In addition, from November 10, 2010 through March 31, 2011, Mr. Shore served as InspireMD Ltd.’s vice president of business development. From February 2008 through June 2009, Mr. Shore served as chief financial officer of World Group Capital Ltd. and Nepco Star Ltd., both publicly traded companies on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, based in Tel Aviv, Israel. From March 2006 until February 2008, Mr. Shore served as the chief financial officer of Cellnets Solutions Ltd., a provider of advanced cellular public telephony solutions for low to middle income populations of developing countries based in Azur, Israel. Mr. Shore has over 2530 years of experience in financial management in the United States, Europe and Israel.Israel for companies such as Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb and General Electric. His experience includes raising capital both in the private and public markets. Mr. Shore graduated with honors and received a B.Sc. in Finance from Pennsylvania State University and an M.B.A. from George Washington University.

Agustin V. Gago has served as our executive vice president and chief commercial officer since October 24, 2016. Mr. Gago has over 25 years of experience in building profitable international commercial, sales and marketing organizations. Prior to joining us, Mr. Gago served as a principal at Dash International, LLC, a consulting firm he founded in 2013, advising senior management of major medical device companies on business strategy. From 2009 to 2013, Mr. Gago served as chief commercial officer at Delcath Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: DCTH), an interventional oncology company, creating its direct and contract sales forces as well as a distributor infrastructure serving Europe, Asia and South America. From 2011 to 2013, Mr. Gago also served as a director of Delcath Systems, Inc.’s subsidiary in Galway, Ireland. From 2008 to 2009, Mr. Gago was vice president of international oncology surgery sales at AngioDynamics, Inc. (NASDAQ: ANGO), a provider of minimally invasive medical devices for cardiology vascular disease and oncology. Mr. Gago also worked from 1998 to 2008 in various leadership roles at E-Z-EM, Inc. (acquired by Bracco Diagnostics Inc.), a global manufacturer of medical devices and contrast agents for gastrointestinal imaging, and served as a director of E-Z-EM, Inc.’s subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, eventually being appointed as vice president of global gastrointestinal business and vice president of international operations of E-Z EM, Inc. Mr. Gago received a B.S. degree in business management from Hofstra University.

Sol J. Barer, Ph.D.has served as a director since July 11, 2011 and has served as our chairman since November 16, 2011. Dr. Barer has over 25 years of experience with publicly traded biotechnology companies. In 1980, when Dr. Barer was with Celanese Research Company, he formed the biotechnology group that was subsequently spun out to form Celgene Corporation. Dr. Barer spent 18 years leading Celgene Corporation as president, chief operating officer and chief executive officer, culminating with his tenure as Celgene Corporation’s executive chairman from June 2010 until January 2011 and chairman from May 2006 until June 2010 and from January 2011 until his retirement in June 2011. Dr. Barer is also the chariman of the board of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and a director of Edge Therapeutics, Inc., Medgenics, Inc., Centrexion Corporation, ContraFect Corporation, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. and serves as a senior advisor to biotechnology companies. Dr. Barer received a Ph.D. in organic chemistry from Rutgers University. Dr. Barer brings to the board significant scientific and executive leadership experience in the U.S. biotechnology industry and prior service on the board of directors of other publicly-held biopharmaceutical companies, as well as a unique perspective on the best methods of growth for a biotechnology company.

Isaac Blech has served as a director and our vice chairmen since January 22, 2016. Mr. Blech is a renowned biotechnology entrepreneur and investor, who, over the past 32 years, has founded and served on the board of companies which have produced major advances in a broad array of diseases, including the diagnosis of chlamydia, herpes, syphilis and HIV, and the treatment of cystic fibrosis, sexual dysfunction, multiple myeloma and brain cancer. The companies he established include Celgene Corporation (NASDAQ: CELG), ICOS Corporation, Nova Pharmaceutical Corporation, Pathogenesis Corporation and Genetics Systems Corporation. Mr. Blech’s current roles include director and founder of Cerecor, Inc. (NASDAQ: CERC), a public company developing new treatments for central nervous system disorders, director of ContraFect Corporation (NASDAQ: CFRX), a public infectious disease company, director of Aevi Genomic Medicine (NYSE: GNMX), a public company creating new treatments for rare diseases, and vice chairman of Edge Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: EDGE), a public company that treats life-threatening neurological conditions. He is vice chairman of Centrexion Corporation, a private company which is developing new modalities of pain control, vice chairman of Regenovation, Inc., a private company developing new ways to regenerate human tissue, vice chairman of X4 Pharmaceuticals, a private cancer immunology company, vice chairman of Sapience Therapeutics, a private oncology company and vice chairman of Aridis Pharmaceuticals, a private company with a product to treat pneumonia. He also serves as vice chairman of WaveGuide Corporation, a private company developing the world’s smallest NMR machine, vice chairman of root9B Technologies, Inc. (OTC: RTNB), a public cyber security company, and vice chairman of The SpendSmart Payments Company (OTC: SSPC), a public electronic rewards company. Our board of directors believes that Mr. Blech’s broad experiences as a founder, director and major investor in numerous biotechnology companies provide him with the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

 67

 

Michael Berman has served as our director since February 7, 2013. Mr. Berman is a medical device entrepreneur who works with high-potential development and early-stage commercial companies. From 2005 to 2012, when the company was sold to Boston Scientific, Mr. Berman was a co-founder and the chairman of BridgePoint Medical, Inc., which developed technology to treat coronary and peripheral vascular chronic total occlusions. Mr. Berman was also a member of the board of Lutonix, Inc. from 2007 until 2011, when the company was sold to C.R. Bard, Inc. From 2011 to 2019, Mr. Berman served as a co-founder and director of Rebiotix Inc., a company developing an innovative treatment for C Diff colitis. Rebiotix was sold to Ferring Pharmaceuticals in 2018. From 2014 till 2018 Mr. Berman served as a director Mazor Robotics, a company pioneering Spinal Robotic Surgery. Mr. Berman has served (i) since 2011 as an advisor to, and since 2012 as a director of, Cardiosonic, Inc., a company developing a system for hypertension reduction via renal denervation, (ii) since 2005 as a director of PharmaCentra, LLC, which creates customizable marketing programs that help pharmaceutical companies communicate with physicians and patients, (iii) since 20112018 as a co-founder and directorDirector of Rebiotix Inc., a company developing an innovative treatment for C Diff colitis, (iv) since 2011 as a director of AngioSlide Ltd.,STMedical, a medical device company that has developed an embolic capture angioplasty device, (v)a temporary stent for the treatment of chronic sinusitis, (iv) since 20112019 as a director of InterValve, Inc.,CardiacSense Inc, a medical device company developing an aortic valvuloplasty balloon for treatmentthat has developed a smart watch vital sign monitor, (v) since 2017 as a Director of calcific aortic stenosis,Owlytics Healthcare, (vi) since 2013 as a Director of ClearCut Inc., a medical device company that has developed an MRI system for tumor margin assessment, (vii) since 2013 as a director of PulmOne Ltd., a medical device company developing an innovative Pulmonary Function Testing system, (viii) since 2014 as a director of Mazor Robotics, Inc., a publicly held company that has developed and markets an innovative system for robotic surgery, (ix) since 2014 as a director of SoniVie, a medical device company, (x) since 2016 as a director at EndoSpan Ltd. and (xi)(ix) since 2014 as a venture partner at RiverVest Ventures.Ventures and (x) since 2017 as a Director of Truleaf Medical. Mr. Berman brings to the board his extensive executive and entrepreneurial experiences in the field of medical devices and interventional cardiology,vascular intervention, which should assist in strengthening and advancing our strategic focus.

Campbell Rogers, M.D. has served as a director since September 3, 2013. Dr. Rogers is the executive vice president and chief medical officer of HeartFlow, Inc., a cardiovascular diagnostics company, since March 2012. Prior to joining HeartFlow, Inc., he was the chief scientific officer and global head of research and development at Cordis Corporation (currently part of Cardinal Health, Inc.), Johnson & Johnson, where he was responsible for leading investments and research in cardiovascular devices. Prior to that, he was associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and the Harvard-M.I.T. Division of Health Sciences and Technology and director of the cardiac catheterization and experimental cardiovascular interventional laboratories at Brigham and Women’s Hospital. He served as principal investigator for numerous interventional cardiology device, diagnostic, and pharmacology trials, is the author of numerous journal articles, chapters, and books in the area of coronary artery and other cardiovascular diseases and was the recipient of research grant awards from the National Institute of Health and the American Heart Association. He received his A.B. from Harvard College and his M.D. from Harvard Medical School. Dr. Rogers’ qualifications to serve on the board include his significant experience in cardiovascular devices, as well as his familiarity with the operations of medical device companies.

 

Paul Stuka has served as a director since August 8, 2011.2011 and has served as our chairman since June 2, 2017. Mr. Stuka has served as the managing member of Osiris Partners, LLC, an investment fund, since 2000. Prior to forming Osiris Partners, LLC, Mr. Stuka, with 3540 years of experience in the investment industry, was a managing director of Longwood Partners, managing small cap institutional accounts. In 1995, Mr. Stuka joined State Street Research and Management as manager of its Market Neutral and Mid Cap Growth Funds. From 1986 to 1994, Mr. Stuka served as the general partner of Stuka Associates, where he managed a U.S.-based investment partnership. Mr. Stuka began his career in 1980 as an analyst at Fidelity Management and Research. As an analyst, Mr. Stuka followed a wide array of industries including healthcare, energy, transportation, and lodging and gaming. Early in his career he became the assistant portfolio manager for three Fidelity Funds, including the Select Healthcare Fund which was recognized as the top performing fund in the United States for the five-year period ending December 31, 1985. Mr. Stuka has been serving as a director of Caliber Imaging & Diagnostics, Inc. (formerly Lucid, Inc.) since June 2013. Mr. Stuka’s qualifications to serve on the board include his significant strategic and business insight from his years of experience investing in the healthcare industry.

Thomas J. Kester has served as a director since September 6, 2016. Mr. Kester has been serving as the chief financial officer of Kester Search Group, Inc., a private executive search firm specializing in sales force placement for medical, dental and diagnostic device companies, since October 2014. From 2004 to 2010, Mr. Kester served as a director of Orthofix International, NV (NASDAQ: OFIX), a global medical device company. Mr. Kester’s experience includes 28 years at KPMG LLP, including 18 years as an audit partner, advising public and private companies in connection with annual audit and financings. Mr. Kester’s qualifications to serve on the board include his significant strategic and business insight from his years of experience auditing global companies and serving on the boards of several public and not-for-profit organizations. Mr. Kester received his B.S. in mechanical engineering from Cornell University and an M.B.A. from Harvard University.

 

Gary Roubin, M.D. has served as a director since October 13, 2020. Dr. Barry,Roubin cofounded Essential Medical Inc., which has had success in bringing a large bore vascular closure device to world markets and was recently acquired by Teleflex Inc. From 2002 to 2003, Dr. Roubin served as Chief Medical Officer of the Medicines Company during the release of its Angiomax product. From 2003 to 2012, Dr. Roubin served as Department Chairman and Chief of Service of the Lenox Hill Hospital Cardiac and Vascular program in New York. From 1989 to 1997, he served as Chief of Interventional Cardiology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, to which he joined in 1989 as Professor of Medicine and Radiology and Director of the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories and Interventional Cardiology Section at the University Hospital. In 2001, Dr. Roubin played a pivotal role in the success of Mednova Inc., which was acquired by Abbott Vascular, resulting in the introduction and marketing in the U.S. of the top selling carotid embolic protection system (NAV6) and stent system (XACT). In 1987, he developed and placed the world’s first balloon expandable coronary stent. In 1984, Dr. Roubin joined Andreas Gruentzig at Emory University to continue his post-doctoral research. He is also acknowledged for the development of coronary stenting and the first FDA-approved coronary stent. Dr. Roubin received his M.D. from the University of Queensland medical school and his Ph.D. from Sydney University.

Mr. Slosman and Mr. Shore and Mr. Gago are parties to certain agreements related to their service as executive officers and directors described under “Executive Compensation – Agreements with Executive Officers.”

 

Family Relationships

 

We have no family relationships amongst our directors and executive officers.

 

Director Independence

 

The board of directors has determined that Drs. Barer andDr. Rogers and Messrs. Stuka, Berman Blech and Kester, and our former director, James J. Loughlin, who resigned from our board as of May 24, 2016, satisfy the requirement for independence set out in Section 803 of the NYSE MKTAmerican rules and that each of these directors has no material relationship with us (other than being a director and/or a stockholder). In making its independence determinations, the board of directors sought to identify and analyze all of the facts and circumstances relating to any relationship between a director, his immediate family or affiliates and our company and our affiliates and did not rely on categorical standards other than those contained in the NYSE MKTAmerican rule referenced above.

 

Board Committees

 

Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a nominating and corporate governance committee and a compensation committee, each of which has the composition and responsibilities described below.

 

Audit Committee. Our audit committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Berman, Stuka and Kester, each of whom our board has determined to be financially literate and qualify as an independent director under Section 803(B)(2) of the NYSE MKTAmerican rules. Mr. Kester is the chairman of our audit committee and qualifies as a financial expert, as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K. The audit committee’s duties are to recommend to our board of directors the engagement of independent auditors to audit our financial statements and to review our accounting and auditing principles. The audit committee will review the scope, timing and fees for the annual audit and the results of audit examinations performed by the internal auditors and independent public accountants, including their recommendations to improve the system of accounting and internal controls. The audit committee operates under a formal charter adopted by the board of directors that governs its duties and conduct. Copies of the charter can be obtained free of charge from the Company’s web site, www.inspiremd.com, by contacting the Company.

 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  Our nominating and corporate governance committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Berman and Stuka, and Dr. Barer, each of whom qualify as an independent director under Section 803(A) of the NYSE MKTAmerican rules. Mr. Berman is the chairman of our nominating and corporate governance committee. The nominating and corporate governance committee identifies and recommends to our board of directors individuals qualified to be director nominees. In addition, the nominating and corporate governance committee recommends to our board of directors the members and chairman of each board committee who will periodically review and assess our code of business conduct and ethics and our corporate governance guidelines. The nominating and corporate governance committee also makes recommendations for changes to our code of business conduct and ethics and our corporate governance guidelines to our board of directors, reviews any other matters related to our corporate governance and oversees the evaluation of our board of directors and our management. The nominating and corporate governance committee operates under a formal charter adopted by the board of directors that governs its duties and conduct. Copies of the charter can be obtained free of charge from the Company’s web site, www.inspiremd.com, by contacting the Company.

Compensation Committee.  Our compensation committee is currently comprised of Mr.Messrs. Stuka and Dr. Barer,Kester, each of whom qualify as an independent director under Sections 803(A) and 805(c)(1) of the NYSE MKTAmerican rules. Mr. Stuka is the chairman of our compensation committee. The compensation committee reviews and approves our salary and benefits policies, including compensation of executive officers and directors. The compensation committee also administers our stock option plans and recommends and approves grants of stock options under such plans. The compensation committee operates under a formal charter adopted by the board of directors that governs its duties and conduct. Copies of the charter can be obtained free of charge from the Company’s web site, www.inspiremd.com, by contacting the Company.

80

 

Code of Ethics

 

We have adopted a code of ethics and business conduct that applies to our officers, directors and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, which is posted on our website atwww.inspire-md.com. We intend to disclose future amendments to certain provisions of the code of ethics, or waivers of such provisions granted to executive officers and directors, on this website within four business days following the date of such amendment or waiver.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The table below sets forth the compensation earned by our named executive officers for the twelve monthtwelve-month period ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015.2019.

 

 

Name and Principal Position

 Year 

Salary ($)

  Bonus ($)  

Restricted

Stock

Awards ($)(1)

  

Option

Awards ($)(1)

  

All Other

Compensation ($)

  Total ($) 
James Barry, Ph.D. 2016  288,958   106,458(2)  334,871   235,783   25,820(3)  991,890 
President and Chief Executive Officer 2015  300,333(4)  37,500(5)  127,167(6)  16,740   19,936(3)  532,093 
                           
Craig Shore 2016  290,341(7)(8)  50,000(7)(9)  83,718   60,711   95,343(7)(10)  580,113(7)
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer 2015  224,481(7)  17,349(5)(7)  33,750   33,479   74,318(7)(10)  383,377(7)
                           
Agustin Gago 2016  51,225   25,000(11)  -   61,241   -   137,466 
Executive Vice President And Chief Commercial Officer                          
                           
Alan Milinazzo 2016  242,086(13)  -   -   -   25,312(14)  267,398 
Former President and ChiefExecutive Officer(12) 2015  225,000(15)  45,833(5)  428,826(3)  131,221   20,462(14)  851,342 
Name and Principal Position Year  

Salary

($)

  Bonus ($)  

Restricted

Stock

Awards

($)(1)

  

Option

Awards

($)(1)

  

All Other

Compensation

($)

  Total ($) 
Marvin Slosman 2020   366,666(2)  150,000(3)  658,981   196,162(7) 10,309(4)  1,382,118 
President and
Chief Executive Officer
                           
                            
Craig Shore 2020   265,004(2)(5)  138,692(3)(5)  264,745   78,955   121,626(6)  869,022 
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer 2019   269,758(5)  60,000(5)  57,000   -   114,395(6)  501,153 

 

(1)The amounts reflectFor awards of stock, the dollar amounts recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2016 and 2015aggregate grant date fair value is computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Fair value is based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the fair value of the underlying shares at the measurement date. For additional discussion of the valuation assumptions used in determining stock-based compensation and the grant date fair value for stock options, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies — Share-based compensation”.
  
(2)PursuantOn April 21, 2020, Mr. Slosman and Mr. Shore each signed waivers in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic and certain cost-reduction measures, whereby Mr. Slosman’s monthly base salary was reduced from $33,333 to $16,666 and Mr. Shore’s monthly base salary was reduced from NIS 80,125 to NIS 40,063. On June 10, 2020, following the fourth amendmentclosing of Dr. Barry’s employment agreement datedour underwritten public offering in June 6, 2016.2020, each of Mr. Slosman’s and Mr. Shore’s monthly base salaries were reinstated to $33,333 and NIS 80,125, respectively, effective as of June 1, 2020.
  
(3)Dr. Barry’sCash bonus awards for the 2020 calendar year were approved by the compensation committee in January 2021.
(4)Mr. Slosman’s other compensation for 2020 consisted solely of benefits related to health insurance.
  
(4)Includes $26,583 of salary forgone at the election of Dr. Barry, representing 50% of his salary from March 10, 2015 through April 30, 2015 in exchange for 3,692 shares of restricted common stock. See “— Agreements with Executive Officers — James Barry.”
(5)Bonuses for the 2015 calendar year were approved by the compensation committee in July 2015.
(6)Includes 4,757 shares of restricted common stock we issued to Dr. Barry in lieu of 50% of his base salary pursuant to amendments to employment agreement with Dr. Barry, dated January 5, 2016, and dated February 22, 2015. See “— Agreements with Executive Officers — James Barry.”
(7)Compensation amounts received in non-U.S. currency have been converted into U.S. dollars using the average exchange rate for the applicable period, except for bonus amounts which have been converted into U.S. dollars using 3.846 NIS per dollar and 3.7693.215 NIS per dollar which werewas the exchange ratesrate as of June 30, 2016 and 2015.December 31, 2020. The average exchange rate for the twelve month period ended December 31, 20162020 and 20152019 were 3.84093.437 NIS per dollar and 3.8843.564 NIS per dollar, respectively.
  
(8)Mr. Shore’s salary for 2016 includes cash paid in lieu of accrued vacation of $51,678.
(9)Bonuses for the 2016 calendar year were approved by the compensation committee in July 2016.
(10)(6)Mr. Shore’s other compensation consisted solely of benefits in the twelve months ended December 31, 20162020 and 2015.2019. In each of the periods reported, Mr. Shore’s benefits included our contributions to his severance, pension, vocational studies and disability funds, an annual recreation payment, a company car or car allowance and cell phone, and a daily food allowance.
  
(11)(7)Pursuant to Mr. Gago’s employment agreement, dated October 24, 2016.
(12)Mr. Milinazzo served as our president, chief executive officer and director until his resignation from such positions on June 6, 2016. Mr. Milinazzo served as our director during the twelve months ended December 31, 2015 and prior to his resignation on June 6, 2016, but did not receive any additional compensation for his services as director.
(13)Mr. Milinazzo’s salary for 2016 includes cash paid in lieu of accrued vacation of $31,818.
(14)Mr. Milinazzo’s other compensation consisted solely of benefits related to health insurance.
(15)Pursuant to amendments to employment agreement with Mr. Milinazzo, dated January 5, 2016, and June 29, 2015, Mr. Milinazzo received 50% of his base salary for January 2015 through December 31, 2015, or $225,000, in 31,250182,381 shares of restricted common stock which was issued on January 26, 2015, and 63,825 sharesissuable upon the exercise of restricted common stock, which was issued on December 31, 2015. See “— Agreements with Executive Officers — Alan Milinazzo.”Restricted Stock Units outside our 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

 70

Agreements with Executive Officers

James Barry, Ph.D.Marvin Slosman

 

On July 14, 2014,December 9, 2019, we entered into an employment agreementEmployment Agreement with James BarryMarvin Slosman, which was subsequently amended on December 31, 2019 (as amended, the “Slosman Employment Agreement”), pursuant to servewhich Mr. Slosman was appointed as our executive vice president and chief operating officer, which was first amended on January 5, 2015, and further amended on February 22, 2015 and on March 28, 2016, and on June 6, 2016, our board of directors appointed Dr. Barry as our president andnew chief executive officer and further amendedpresident. Mr. Slosman’s term of employment commenced on January 1, 2020, which will remain in effect for three years (the “Initial Employment Term”), unless earlier terminated, and to be automatically renewed for successive one-year terms after the employment agreement. Dr. BarryInitial Employment Term. Mr. Slosman was previously a director and continues his rolealso appointed as a director. TheClass 3 director, effective January 1, 2020, with a term expiring on the 2020 annual meeting of Dr. Barry’s employment will continue until May 31, 2017, with Dr. Barry resigning as a member of the board of directors at the end of such term if requested by us, and in the event that the term is not extended beyond May 31, 2017 by mutual agreement of the parties and we do not offer Dr. Barry a positionour stockholders.

As consideration for his services as chief executive officer, and/or chief operating officer on the same or more favorable terms with a base salary that is at least 10% greater than his current base salary, Dr. Barry’s terminationMr. Slosman will be deemed a termination without cause.

Under the employment agreement, as amended, Dr. Barry is entitled to receive (i) an annual base salary of at least $365,000. Such amount may be reduced only as part of an overall cost reduction program that affects all of our senior executives$400,000, less applicable payroll deductions and does not disproportionately affect Dr. Barry, so long as such reductions do not reduce the base salary to a rate that is less than 90% of the amount set forth above (or 90% of the amount totax (“Base Salary”), which it has been increased). The base salary will be reviewed annually by the boardBoard on an annual basis for increaseincrease; (ii) reimbursement of up to $50,000 for any reasonable and customary, documented out-of-pocket relocation expenses actually incurred by Mr. Slosman in 2019 or 2020 calendar years, in connection with his relocation to Europe; (iii) annual performance bonuses in an amount up to 50% percent of the Base Salary, as partmay be in effect from time to time, for each calendar year during his employment with us based on the extent to which performance criteria/financial results for the applicable year have been met; and (iv) equity awards as of its annual compensation review.

Priorthe date of the Slosman Employment Agreement that represent, in the aggregate, 5% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock determined on a fully diluted basis as of the date of grant (the “Equity Awards”), with 75% of the Equity Awards being granted as restricted stock units and with the remaining 25% of the Equity Awards being granted as stock options, all of which Equity Awards shall be outside of the 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan and subject to his appointment as our presidentterms and chief executive officer, Dr. Barry was alsoconditions of the award agreements entered by Mr. Slosman. In addition, on or before December 31, 2020, Mr. Slosman shall become eligible to receive an annual bonusadditional grant of equity awards under the 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the applicable award agreements up to $225,000 upon5% (including the Equity Awards) of the Company’s actual outstanding shares of Common Stock on the date of grant, provided that the actual amount of the grant shall be based on the achievement of reasonable target objectives and performance goals, to be determinedcertain performance/financial criteria as established by the board of directors inBoard after consultation with Dr. Barry on or beforeMr. Slosman, in its reasonable discretion. For the endpurposes of the first quarterequity award calculation, “fully diluted basis” is defined as the sum of the fiscal yeartotal shares of common stock then outstanding, the shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of our then outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and the shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of our then outstanding pre-funded warrant. On January 2, 2020, pursuant to which the bonus relatesSlosman Employment Agreement, we granted Mr. Slosman restricted stock units for 182,381 shares and a stock option to purchase 60,794 shares of common stock at $1.10 per share.

In the event Mr. Slosman voluntarily resigns without good reason, we may, in our sole discretion, shorten the notice period and determine the date of termination without any obligation to pay Mr. Slosman any additional compensation other than the accrued obligations and without triggering a termination of Mr. Slosman’s employment without cause. In the event the Slosman Employment Agreement expires, or we terminate Mr. Slosman’s employment for cause or Mr. Slosman voluntarily resigns without good reason, we shall have no further liability or obligation to Mr. Slosman under the Slosman Employment Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event actual performance exceedsthat this the goals,Slosman Employment Agreement expires as a result of our decision not to renew the board may, in its sole discretion, pay Dr. Barry bonus compensation of more than $225,000. PursuantSlosman Employment Agreement, we shall, subject to the amendmentexecution and timely return by Mr. Slosman of a release of claims, pay Mr. Slosman cash payments totaling $100,000 in the aggregate, payable in equal installments on our regular pay dates that occur during the period commencing on 60th day following his employment termination date and ending on the last day of the Restricted Period (as defined below); provided, however, that if, at any time within the period commencing on the date that is 3 months prior to Dr. Barry’s employmentthe expiration of the Initial Employment Term or the then current renewal term, as applicable, and ending on the date that is 3 months following the expiration of the Slosman Employment Agreement, we and a third party execute a definitive, written, and binding agreement upon his appointment as our president and chief executive director, (i) effective(a “Sale Agreement”) to enter into certain transactions described therein that, if consummated, would constitute a change in control in us, then Mr. Slosman’s termination shall be deemed a termination by us without cause or for good reason, as of June 6, 2016, Dr. Barrythe date such Sale Agreement is eligibleexecuted, provided further that any amounts payable to receive annual bonus compensationMr. Slosman pursuant to such termination shall be reduced by any amounts previously paid to him upon expiration of the Slosman Employment Agreement, termination by us for cause or voluntary resignation by Mr. Slosman without good reason.

If Mr. Slosman’s employment is terminated (i) by us without cause or (ii) by Mr. Slosman for good reason, then we must pay Mr. Slosman, (a) a severance pay in an amount equal to 100%twelve months of his then-current base salary, upon(b) his entire performance bonus for any calendar year for which Mr. Slosman has already worked the achievement of reasonable target objectives andentire year but the bonus has yet to be paid, (c) a pro-rated performance goals as may be determined by the board of directors in consultation with Dr. Barry and (ii) on the first to occur of (a) the first payroll period that is on or after the 20th business day following closing of a transaction with investors where we raise an aggregate of $5 million or (b) March 15, 2017, Dr. Barry will receive a lump-sum retention bonus in an amount equal to $106,458, subjectthe target annual performance bonus to Dr. Barry’s continued employment through such date, which amount was paid on July 14, 2016. In addition, Dr. Barry is eligible to receive such additional bonus or incentive compensation as the boardMr. Slosman may establish from time to time in its sole discretion.

On January 5, 2015, we amended Dr. Barry’s employment agreement to provide that, for a limited period of time to be mutually agreed to by us and Dr. Barry, Dr. Barry will receive 50% of his base salary in cash payments, with the remaining 50% to be paid in an equivalent amount of shares of restricted common stock, payable and granted in equal installments in accordance with our normal payroll practices. These shares of restricted stock were to vest immediately and be valued as of the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing agreement, at Dr. Barry’s request, no shares of restricted common stock were granted to Dr. Barry pursuant to this amendment. Rather, we and Dr. Barry determined that it would be in our mutual best interest to make a single grant of shares of restricted common stock to Dr. Barry having a fair market value, as of the date of grant, equal to 50% of his annual base salary, with such shares vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grant, as opposed to making bi-weekly grants of restricted common stock to Dr. Barry. As such, , on January 26, 2015, we issued 761 shares of restricted common stock valued at $180 per share, representing the fair market value of our common stock as of the market close on January 26, 2015, in lieu of 50% of his base salary for his employment in 2015, to vest on January 26, 2016.

On February 22, 2015, we further amended Dr. Barry’s employment agreement to memorialize the payroll adjustment that was made to Dr. Barry’s manner of salary payment on January 26, 2015 and to provide certain additional changes. Specifically, this amendment provided that, until the earlier of (1) September 30, 2015 and (2) we raise an aggregate of $5 million from investors, Dr. Barry shall receive 50% of his base salary in cash payments, with the remaining 50% havinghave been paid to Dr. Barry on January 26, 2015, through the issuance of 19,011 shares of restricted stock as discussed above. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with Dr. Barry’s consent, Dr. Barry continued to receive only 50% of his base salary in cash from March 9, 2015, the date of the closing of our March 2016 offering, from which we received gross proceeds of approximately $13.7 million, until April 30, 2015. As we commenced full cash payment of Dr. Barry’s salary on April 30, 2015, Dr. Barry forfeited 423 shares of restricted stock on May 1, 2015, which represented the shares of restricted common stock previously granted to Dr. Barry to cover 50% of his base salary from May 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015. The remaining such shares of restricted stock issued to Dr. Barry on January 26, 2015 in lieu of cash base salary fully vested on January 26, 2016.

In November 2015, due to our efforts to preserve cash, Dr. Barry agreed to temporarily forego, in exchange for a corresponding reduced time commitment to us, 50% of his base salary. We formalized such voluntarily agreement by entering into an amendment to Dr. Barry’s employment agreement, dated March 28, 2016. The foregoing amendment to Dr. Barry’s employment agreement provides that, until the earlier of (1) the end of the term of his employment, and (2) we raise an aggregate of $5 million from investors, Dr. Barry shall receive 50% of his base salary and shall be eligible for 50% of any annual bonus or other incentive compensation, during which period Dr. Barry shall devote 50% less business time than he ordinarily has devoted or would devote to usentitled for the performance of his services under his employment agreement.

On June 6, 2016,year in connection with Dr. Barry’s appointment as our president and chief executive officer, we further amended Dr. Barry’s employment agreement to provide that, forwhich the period beginning on June 1, 2016 and ending on the earlier of (i) the closing of a transaction with investors where we raise an aggregate of $5 million and (ii) March 15, 2017, Dr. Barry will receive 50% of his base salary in cash payments, payable in accordance with our regular payroll practices, with the remaining 50% of his base salary paid in a lump-sum payment on the first to occur of (a) the first payroll period that is on or after the 20th business day following such transaction or (b) March 15, 2017. In addition, within 20 business days of the closing of the transaction with investors where we raise an aggregate of $5 million, which occurred on July 7, 2016, Dr. Barry was to be granted, subject to the board’s approval and Dr. Barry’s continued employment through the applicable grant date, (i) a nonqualified stock option relating to the number of shares of our common stock equal to 2% of outstanding common stock on the date of the closing of such transaction and (ii) an award of a number of restricted shares of our common stock equal to 2% of outstanding common stock on the date of the closing of such transaction, in each case, subject to the terms and conditions of the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan and a nonqualified stock option agreement and a restricted stock award agreement to be entered into by us and Dr. Barry.

Pursuant to Dr. Barry’s employment agreement, if Dr. Barry’s employment is terminated upon his death or disability, by Dr. Barry for good reason (as such term is defined in Dr. Barry’s employment agreement), or by us without cause (as such term is defined in Dr. Barry’s employment agreement), Dr. Barry will be entitled to receive, in addition to other unpaid amounts owed to him (e.g., for base salary and accrued vacation): (i) the pro rata amount of any bonus for the fiscal year of such termination (assuming full achievement of all applicable goals under the bonus plan)occurs that he would have received had his employment not been terminated; (ii) a one-time lump sum severance payment equal to 150% of his base salary, provided that he executes a release relating to employment matters and the circumstances surrounding his termination in favor of us, our subsidiaries and our officers, directors and related parties and agents, in a form reasonably acceptable to us at the time ofterminated during such termination; (iii) vesting ofyear. In addition, 50% of all unvested stock options, shares of restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, or similar stock basedstock-based rights granted to Dr. Barry,Mr. Slosman shall vest and, lapseif applicable, be immediately exercisable and any risk of any forfeiture included in such restricted or other stock grants; (iv) an extension of the term ofgrants previously made to Mr. Slosman shall immediately lapse, and Mr. Slosman may exercise any outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights until the earlier of (a) eighteen months from(x) the last date of termination, or (b) the latest date that eachon which such stock optionoptions or stock appreciation right would otherwise expire by its original terms; (v) to the fullest extent permitted by our then-current benefit plans, continuation of health, dental, vision and life insurance coverage for the lesser of 18 months after termination or until Dr. Barry obtains coverage from a new employer; and (vi) a cash payment of $25,000, which Dr. Barry may use for executive outplacement services or an education program. The payments described above will be reduced by any payments received by Dr. Barry pursuant to any of our employee welfare benefit plans providing for payments in the event of death or disability. If Dr. Barry continues to be employed by us after the term of his employment agreement, unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing, and Dr. Barry’s employment is terminated upon his death or disability, by Dr. Barry for good reason, or by us without cause, Dr. Barry will be entitled to receive, in addition to other unpaid amounts owed to him, the payments set forth in (i), (ii) and (iv) above. If, during the term of his employment agreement, we terminate Dr. Barry’s employment for cause or by Dr. Barry voluntarily, Dr. Barry will only be entitled to unpaid amounts owed to him and whatever rights if any, are available to him pursuant to our stock-based compensation plans or any award documents related to any stock-based compensation.

Dr. Barry has no specific right to terminate the employment agreement or right to any severance payments or other benefits solely as a result of a change in control. However, if within 24 months following a change in control, (a) Dr. Barry terminates his employment for good reason, or (b) we terminate his employment without cause, the lump sum severance payment to which he is entitled will be increased from 150% of his base salary to 250% of his base salary and all stock options, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights or similar stock-based rights granted to him will vest in full and be immediately exercisable and any risk of forfeiture included in restricted or other stock grants previously made to him will immediately lapse.

Dr. Barry’s employment agreement also contains certain noncompetition, no solicitation, confidentiality, and assignment of inventions requirements for Dr. Barry.

Pursuant to an option cancellation and release agreement, dated January 26, 2016, between us and Dr. Barry, Dr. Barry agreed to cancel options to purchase 2,709 shares of our common stock at exercise prices ranging from $180 to $1,950 previously granted to him. In exchange for the cancellation of Dr. Barry’s options, we granted to Dr. Barry,could have been exercised pursuant to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Planterms of the applicable award agreement, irrespective of Mr. Slosman’s termination of employment; and (y) the 2013 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, whichdate that is a sub-plan to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, one share of our common stock as of January 26, 2016.

two years following his employment termination date.

Craig Shore

 

We have been a party to an employment agreement with Craig Shore since November 28, 2010. On May 5, 2014, we entered into an amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Shore, which was amended on January 5, 2015, July 25, 2016, and on JulyMarch 25, 2016.2019. The employment agreement, as amended, has an initial term that ends on April 20,December 31, 2020, and will automatically renew for additional one-year periods on April 21, 2020 and on each April 21stJanuary 1st thereafter unless either party gives the other party written notice of its election not to extend such employment at least six months prior to the next April 21stJanuary 1st renewal date. If a change in control occurs when less than two full years remain in the initial term or during any renewal term, the employment agreement will automatically be extended for two years from the change in control date and will terminate on the second anniversary of the change in control date.

 

Mr. Shore was initially entitled to a monthly gross salary of $8,750, which amount had increased to $10,620 by 2012. In addition, Mr. Shore’s annual base salary was increased to $175,000 on April 22, 2013, retroactive to January 1, 2013, and to $220,200 in May 2014, retroactive to January 1, 2014. Under the terms of the employment agreement, as amended by the secondthird amendment to the amended and restated employment agreement, dated JulyMarch 25, 2016,2019, Mr. Shore is entitled to an annual base salary of at least $250,000. Such amount may be reduced only as part of an overall cost reduction program that affects all of our senior executives and does not disproportionately affect Mr. Shore, so long as such reduction does not reduce the base salary to a rate that is less than 90% of the amount set forth above (or 90% of the amount to which it has been increased). The base salary will be reviewed annually by our chief executive officer for increase (but not decrease, except as permitted as part of an overall cost reduction program) as part of our annual compensation review. Mr. Shore is also eligible to receive an annual bonus in an amount equal to 60% of his then-annual salary upon the achievement of reasonable target objectives and performance goals, to be determined by the board of directors in consultation with Mr. Shore. On January 5, 2015, we amended Mr. Shore’s amended and restated employment agreement to remove from the amended and restated employment agreement the provision disallowing payment of annual bonus compensation if Mr. Shore achieved less than 70% of the target objectives and performance goals determined by our board of directors in consultation with him. Pursuant to such amendment, Mr. Shore is eligible to receive the percentage of his annual bonus corresponding to the percentage of his achievement of such target objectives and performance goals. The annual bonus will be reviewed annually by our chief executive officer for increase in the amount of the percentage of his then-base salary (but not decrease), as well as the criteria and the goals, as part of our annual compensation review. In addition, Mr. Shore is eligible to receive such additional bonus or incentive compensation as the board may establish from time to time in its sole discretion. Mr. Shore will also be considered for grants of equity awards each year as part of the board’s annual compensation review, which will be made at the sole discretion of the board of directors. Each grant will, with respect to any awards that are options, have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock as of the date of grant, and will be subject to a three-year vesting period subject to Mr. Shore’s continued service with us, with one-third of each additional grant vesting equally on the first, second, and third anniversary of the date of grant for such awards.

The second amendment to the amended and restated employment agreement provides a grant of equity awards to Mr. Shore on or within 10 business days of July 25, 2016 (the “Date of Grant”), with respect to an aggregate number of shares of our common stock equal to 1% of our outstanding common stock and common stock issuable upon the conversion of our outstanding Series B Convertible Preferred Stock on the Date of Grant, 50% of which shall be granted as restricted stock and 50% of which shall be granted as nonqualified stock options, which will be subject to the terms and conditions of the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan and a nonqualified stock option agreement and a restricted stock award agreement to be entered into by us and Mr. Shore and a one-time lump-sum cash bonus in an amount equal to $50,000, payable on or before September 1, 2016.

 

If during the term of the employment agreement, Mr. Shore’s employment is terminated upon his death or disability, by us without cause (as such term is defined in Mr. Shore’s employment agreement), or upon his resignation for “good reason” (as such term is defined in Mr. Shore’s employment agreement), Mr. Shore will be entitled to receive, in addition to any amounts he is entitled to receive under the manager’s insurance policy: (i) any unpaid base salary and accrued unpaid vacation or earned incentive compensation and the pro rata amount of any bonus plan incentive compensation for the fiscal year of such termination (based on the number of business days he was actually employed by us during the fiscal year of such termination and based on the percentage of the goals that he actually achieved under the bonus plan) that he would have received had his employment not been terminated; (ii) a one-time lump sum severance payment equal to 100% of his base salary, provided that he executes a release relating to employment matters and the circumstances surrounding his termination in favor of us, our subsidiaries and our officers, directors and related parties and agents, in a form reasonably acceptable to us at the time of such termination; (iii) vesting of all unvested stock options, stock appreciation rights or similar stock-based rights granted to him and immediate lapse of any risk of forfeiture included in restricted or other stock grants previously made to Mr. Shore; (iv) an extension of the exercise period of all vested stock options granted to Mr. Shore until the earlier of (a) two years from the date of termination or (b) the latest date that each stock option would otherwise expire by its original terms; (v) to the fullest extent permitted by our then-current benefit plans, continuation of health, dental, vision and life insurance coverage for the lesser of 12 months after termination or until Mr. Shore obtains coverage from a new employer; and (vi) reimbursement of up to $30,000 for executive outplacement services, subject to certain restrictions. The severance payment described in (ii) of the foregoing sentence upon Mr. Shore’s death or disability will be reduced by any payments received by Mr. Shore pursuant to any of our employee welfare benefit plans providing for payments in the event of death or disability. If, during or after the term of his employment agreement, Mr. Shore’s employment is terminated by us for cause or by Mr. Shore voluntarily, Mr. Shore will only be entitled to unpaid amounts owed to him (e.g., base salary, accrued vacation and earned incentive compensation through the date of such termination) and whatever rights, if any, are available to him pursuant to our stock-based compensation plan or any award documents related to any stock-based compensation.

Mr. Shore may terminate his employment for good reason by delivering a notice of termination to us 30 days in advance of the date of termination; provided, however, that Mr. Shore agreed to not terminate his employment for good reason until he has given us at least 30 days’ notice from which to cure the circumstances set forth in the notice of termination constituting good reason, and if such circumstances are not cured by the 30th day, Mr. Shore’s employment shall terminate on such date.

Pursuant to terms contained in Mr. Shore’s stock option and restricted stock award agreements, in the event of a change of control of our company, the stock options and restricted stock granted to Mr. Shore that were unvested will vest immediately upon such change of control, in the case of stock options, if such stock options are not assumed or substituted by the surviving company.

 

If we terminate Mr. Shore’s employment without cause, Mr. Shore will be entitled, under Israeli law, to severance payments equal to his last month’s salary multiplied by the number of years Mr. Shore has been employed with us. In order to finance this obligation, we make monthly contributions equal to 8.33% of Mr. Shore’s salary to a severance payment fund. The total amount accumulated in Mr. Shore’s severance payment fund as of December 31, 20142020 was $51,615,$206,000, as adjusted for conversion from New Israeli Shekels to U.S. Dollars. However, if Mr. Shore’s employment is terminated without cause, on account of a disability or upon his death, as of December 31, 2014,2020, Mr. Shore would have been entitled to receive $67,564$270,000 in severance under Israeli law, thereby requiring us to pay Mr. Shore $15,949,$64,000, in addition to releasing the $51,615$206,000 in Mr. Shore’s severance payment fund. On the other hand, pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Shore is entitled to the total amount contributed to and accumulated in his severance payment fund in the event of the termination of his employment as a result of his voluntary resignation. In addition, Mr. Shore would be entitled to receive his full severance payment under Israeli law, including the total amount contributed to and accumulated in his severance payment fund, if he retires from our company at or after age 67.

 

We are entitled to terminate Mr. Shore’s employment immediately at any time for “cause” (as such term is defined in the agreement and the Israeli Severance Payment Act 1963), upon which, after meeting certain requirements under the applicable law and recent Israeli Labor court requirements, we believe we will have no further obligation to compensate Mr. Shore.

 

Also, upon termination of Mr. Shore’s employment for any reason, we will compensate him for all unused or previously uncompensated vacation days accrued.

 

The employment agreement also contains certain standard noncompetition, non-solicitation, confidentiality, and assignment of inventions requirements for Mr. Shore.

 

Mr. Shore is also entitled to participate in or receive benefits under our social insurance and benefits plans, including but not limited to our manager’s insurance policy and education fund, which are customary benefits provided to executive employees in Israel. A management insurance policy is a combination of severance savings (in accordance with Israeli law), defined contribution tax-qualified pension savings and disability pension payments. An education fund is a savings fund of pre-tax contributions to be used after a specified period of time for advanced educational training and other permitted purposes, as set forth in the by-laws of the education fund. We will make periodic contributions to these insurance and social benefits plans based on certain percentages of Mr. Shore’s base salary, including (i) 7.5% to the education fund and (ii) 15.83% to the manager’s insurance policy, of which 8.33% will be allocated to severance pay, 5%5.5% to pension fund payments and up to 2.5% to disability pension payments. Upon the termination of Mr. Shore’s employment for any reason other than for cause, Mr. Shore will be entitled to receive the total amount contributed to and accumulated in his manager insurance policy fund.

PursuantOn August 14, 2020, we entered into the fourth amendment to an option cancellationthat certain Amended and release agreement,Restated Employment Agreement dated as of May 5, 2014, as amended on January 26,5, 2015, July 25, 2016, between us and Mr. Shore, Mr. Shore agreedon March 25, 2019, in order to, cancel options to purchase 1,776 shares of our common stock at exercise prices ranging from $180 to $1,232.12 previously granted to him. In exchange foramong other things, (i) amend the cancellationterm of Mr. Shore’s options, we granted to Mr. Shore, pursuant toemployment, so that the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the 2013 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, which is a sub-plan to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, one share of our common stock as of January 26, 2016.

Agustin V. Gago

On October 24, 2016, we entered into an employment agreement with Agustin V. Gago to serve as our executive vice president and chief commercial officer. The initial term of Mr. Gago’sShore employment endswill end on October 23, 2018, unless earlier terminated or extendedJuly 31, 2022, which will automatically be renewed for additional one-year periods on October 23, 2018,August 1, 2022 and on each and every October 23 thereafter, provided that either party may elect not to extend the term of the employment by prior written notice at least two months prior to the expiration date or the next renewal date.

Pursuant toAugust 1 thereafter; (ii) increase Mr. Gago’s employment agreement, Mr. Gago is entitled to an annual base salary of $275,000, which shall automatically increase to $300,000, effective as of January 1, 2018. Mr. Gago is eligible to receive an annual bonus in an amount up to 50% of his then-base salary, commencing in 2017, based upon the achievement of reasonable target objectives and performance goals as may be determined by our president and chief executive officer and approval of the board of directors after consultation with Mr. Gago. The target objectives shall be based 60% on revenue achievement, 20% on marketing objectives, and 20% on corporate objectives. In addition, in the event that Mr. Gago and his team shall exceed quarterly revenue targets determined by our president and chief executive officer and subject to approval by the board of directors after consultation with Mr. Gago, Mr. Gago may receive additional escalating amounts included as part of the annual bonus based upon the payment scales determined by our president and chief executive officer and subject to approval of the board of directors after consultation with Mr. Gago. Mr. Gago will receive a one-time bonus of $25,000 in the event that our net sales for the fourth quarter of 2016 exceed our forecast by at least 20%. Mr. Gago is also entitled to a one-time bonus of $25,000, payable on or before November 15, 2016, which was paid on October 31, 2016. In addition, pursuant to Mr. Gago’s employment agreement, on October 24, 2016, Mr. Gago was granted (i) a stock option to purchase 13,441 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.86, vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grant (subject to forfeiture upon termination of employment); and (ii) a stock option to purchase 32,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.86, vesting in equal installments on the first and second anniversary of the date of grant, each subject to the terms and conditions of the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and our form of option award agreement. Mr. Gago may also be eligible to receive certain stock options or similar stock-based rights as set forth separately in those certain agreements and subject to the terms and conditions of the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

Either party may terminate the agreement at any time, provided that Mr. Gago provides 90 day’s prior written notice to us of his voluntary resignation and we provide 90 days’ prior written notice of termination by us without cause (as defined in Mr. Gago’s employment agreement) to Mr. Gago. In addition, we may terminate Mr. Gago’s employment for cause, after a 30 day cure period, if the circumstances are curable. If we terminate Mr. Gago’s employment without cause or Mr. Gago’s death, Mr. Gago is entitled to (A) any unpaid base salary accrued through the termination date, any accrued and unpaid vacation pay and any unreimbursed expenses properly incurred prior to the termination date; (B) a severance pay equal to Mr. Gago’s base salary for 12 months; (C) any earned but unpaid annual bonus relating to the calendar year prior to the calendar year in which the termination date occurs; and (D) to the fullest extent permitted by our then-current benefit plans, continuation of certain insurance benefits for the lesser of 12 months after termination of employment or until Mr. Gago secures coverage from new employment. Mr. Gago has no specific right to terminate Mr. Gago’s employment agreement as a result of a change in control (as defined in the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan); however, if following a change in control, during the term of Mr. Gago’s employment, if we terminate Mr. Gago without cause, or the purchaser or surviving entity following the change in control does not offer Mr. Gago a comparable offer of employment, all stock options or similar stock-based rights granted to Mr. Gago shall vest in full and become immediately exercisable.

Mr. Gago’s employment agreement also contains certain noncompetition, non-solicitation, non-disparagement, confidentiality and assignment of work product requirements for Mr. Gago.

Alan Milinazzo

On January 3, 2013, we entered into an employment agreement with Alan Milinazzo to serve as our president, chief executive officer and a director, which was first amended on April 24, 2013, and further amended on January 5, 2015, June 29, 2015, and January 21, 2016. On June 6, 2016, Mr. Milinazzo resigned from his positions as our president, chief executive officer and director, and his employment agreement, as amended, was terminated.

Under the employment agreement, as amended, Mr. Milinazzo was entitled to an annual base salary of at least $450,000. Such amount may be reduced only as part of an overall cost reduction program that affects all of our senior executives and does not disproportionately affect Mr. Milinazzo, so long as such reductions do not reduce theShore’s monthly base salary to a rate that is less than 90% of the amount set forth above (or 90% of the amountNIS 86,000; and (iii) amend certain terms related to which it has been increased). The base salary was to be reviewed annually by the board for increase as part of its annual compensation review. Mr. Milinazzo was also eligible to receive an annual bonus of at least $275,000 upon the achievement of reasonable target objectives and performance goals, to be determined by the board of directors in consultation with Mr. Milinazzo on or before the end of the first quarter of the fiscal year to which the bonus related and, in the event actual performance exceeded the goals, the board had the discretion to pay Mr. Milinazzo bonus compensation of more than $275,000. The annual bonus amount was to be less than $275,000 if the target objectives and performance goals were not met. In addition, Mr. Milinazzo was eligible to receive such additional bonus or incentive compensation as the board may have established from time to time in its sole discretion.

On January 5, 2015, we amended Mr. Milinazzo’s employment agreement to provide that, for a limited period of time to be mutually agreed to by us and Mr. Milinazzo, Mr. Milinazzo would receive 50% of his base salary in cash payments, with the remaining 50% to be paid in an equivalent amount of shares of restricted common stock, payable and granted in equal installments in accordance with our normal payroll practices. These shares of restricted stock were to vest immediately and be valued as of the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. Notwithstanding the foregoing agreement, at Mr. Milinazzo’s request, no shares of restricted common stock were granted to Mr. Milinazzo pursuant to this amendment. Rather, we and Mr. Milinazzo determined that it would be in our mutual best interest to make a single grant of shares of restricted common stock to Mr. Milinazzo having a fair market value, as of the date of grant, equal to 50% of his annual base salary, with such shares vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grant, as opposed to making bi-weekly grants of restricted common stock to Mr. Milinazzo. As such, on January 26, 2015, we issued 1,250 shares of restricted common stock valued at $180 per share, representing the fair market value of our common stock as of the market close on January 26, 2015, in lieu of 50% of his base salary for his employment in 2015, to vest on January 26, 2016.

On June 29, 2015, we further amended Mr. Milinazzo’s employment agreement to memorialize the payroll adjustment that was made to Mr. Milinazzo’s manner of salary payment on January 26, 2015, and to provide certain additional changes. Specifically, this amendment provided that, until we raise an aggregate of $5 million from investors, Mr. Milinazzo would receive with respect to his employment in 2015, 50% of his base salary in cash payments, with the remaining 50% having been paid to Mr. Milinazzo on January 26, 2015, through the issuance of 1,250 shares of restricted common stock as discussed above, which would be subsequently adjusted based upon the volume-weighted average price of our common stock during the calendar year ended December 31, 2015 (or during the period from January 2, 2015 through his termination date if Mr. Milinazzo’s employment is terminated upon his death or disability, by Mr. Milinazzo for good reason, or by us without cause prior to December 31, 2015) to represent the equivalent of 50% of Mr. Milinazzo’s base salary in 2015. On December 31, 2015, we issued an additional 2,553 shares of restricted common stock as an adjustment pursuant to such amendment, as the value of our common stock declined following the grant to Mr. Milinazzo on January 26, 2015.

On January 21, 2016, we further amended Mr. Milinazzo’s employment agreement to provide that, during the remaining term of his employment, Mr. Milinazzo would receive (A) 50% of his base salary in cash payments, for all days that Mr. Milinazzo works during the remaining term of his employment, at the monthly rate of $18,750, payable in accordance with our regular payroll practices, and (B) a lump-sum payment equivalent to 50% of Mr. Milinazzo’s base salary through June 30, 2016, at the monthly rate of $18,750, payable within 20 business days from the earlier of (x) us raising an aggregate of $5 million from investors, or (y) June 30, 2016.

In accordance with Mr. Milinazzo’s employment agreement, on January 3, 2013, we granted Mr. Milinazzo a nonqualified stock option to purchase 2,104 shares of our common stock, made pursuant to a nonqualified stock option agreement, an incentive stock option to purchase 297 shares of our common stock, made pursuant to an incentive stock option agreement, and 1,600 shares of restricted stock, which are subject to forfeiture until the vesting of such shares, made pursuant to a restricted stock award agreement. The options have an exercise price of $1,012.5, which was the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The options were subject to a three-year vesting period subject to Mr. Milinazzo’s continued service with us, with one-thirty-sixth (1/36th) of such awards vesting each month. The shares of restricted stock initially vested monthly over thirty-six months, with 1/36 vesting on February 3, 2013, March 3, 2013 and April 3, 2013. The grant was then amended to vest annually over three years, with 9/36 vesting on January 3, 2014, and one-third vesting on January 3, 2015 and January 3, 2016. On or before December 31 of each calendar year, Mr. Milinazzo was eligible to receive an additional grant of equity awards equal, in the aggregate, to up to 0.5% of actual outstanding shares of our common stock on the date of grant, provided that the actual amount of the grant was based on his achievement of certain performance objectives as established by the board, in its reasonable discretion, for each such calendar year. Each additional grant was, with respect to any awards that were options, to have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock, and be subject to a three-year vesting period subject to Mr. Milinazzo’s continued service with us, with one-third of each additional grant vesting equally on the first, second, and third anniversary of the date of grant for such awards. In connection with the equity compensation related to 2013 achievements, on January 29, 2014, Mr. Milinazzo was granted stock options to purchase 346 shares of common stock and 346 restricted shares. In connection with the equity compensation related to 2014 achievements, on January 26, 2015, Mr. Milinazzo was granted stock options to purchase 212 shares of common stock and 212 restricted shares.

Mr. Milinazzo’s employment agreement, as amended, also contains certain noncompetition, non-solicitation, confidentiality, and assignment of inventions requirements for Mr. Milinazzo.

Pursuant to Mr. Milinazzo’s employment agreement, as amended, if Mr. Milinazzo’s employment had been terminated upon his death or disability, by Mr. Milinazzo for good reason (as such term is defined in Mr. Milinazzo’s employment agreement, as amended), or by us without cause (as such term is defined in Mr. Milinazzo’s employment agreement, as amended), Mr. Milinazzo was entitled to receive, in addition to other unpaid amounts owed to him (e.g., for base salary and accrued vacation): (i) any unpaid incentive compensation (as such term is defined in the employment agreement, as amended) actually earned or owing as of the termination date; (ii) vesting of 100% of all unvested stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights or similar stock based rights granted to Mr. Milinazzo, and lapse of any forfeiture included in such restricted or other stock grants; (iii) an extension of the exercise period of any outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights until the earlier of (a) two (2) years from the date of termination, or (b) the latest date that each stock option or stock appreciation right would otherwise expire by its original terms; and (iv) to the fullest extent permitted by our then-current benefit plans, continuation of benefits coverage for the lesser of 12 months after termination or until Mr. Milinazzo obtains coverage from a new employer. If, during the term of the employment agreement, as amended, we terminated Mr. Milinazzo’s employment for cause or Mr. Milinazzo voluntarily terminated his employment, Mr. Milinazzo would have only be entitled to unpaid amounts owed to him and whatever rights, if any, were available to him pursuant to our stock-based compensation plans or any award documents related to any stock-based compensation.

Mr. Milinazzo had no specific right to terminate the employment agreement or right to any severance payments or other benefits solely as a result of a change in control. However, if within 24 months following a change in control, (a) Mr. Milinazzo terminated his employment for good reason, or (b) we terminated hisShore’s employment without cause, the lump sum severance payment to which he would have been entitled to would have been equal to 200% of his base salary, and all stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights or similar stock-based rights granted to him would have vested in full and been immediately exercisable and any risk of forfeiture included in restricted or other stock grants previously made to him would have immediately lapsed.Cause (as defined therein).

Pursuant to an option cancellation and release agreement, dated January 26, 2016, between us and Mr. Milinazzo, Mr. Milinazzo agreed to cancel options to purchase 6,422 shares of our common stock at exercise prices ranging from $180 to $1,012.5 previously granted to him. In exchange for the cancellation of Mr. Milinazzo’s options, we granted to Mr. Milinazzo, pursuant to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the 2013 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, which is a sub-plan to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, one share of our common stock as of January 26, 2016.

2016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

Name Grant Date All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards  ($/Sh) Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)
 James Barry, Ph.D. 01/26/2016(1) 1         14 
President and Chief 07/25/2016     70,500   4.75   235,783 
Executive Officer 08/01/2016  70,500         334,871 
                   
Craig Shore 01/26/2016(1) 1         14 
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary 07/25/2016     17,625   4.75   60,711 
and Treasurer 07/25/2016  17,625         83,718 
                   
Agustin V. Gago 10/24/2016     32,000   1.86   43,308 
Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer 10/24/2016     13,441   1.86   17,933 
                   

Alan Milinazzo(2)

Former President and Chief Executive Officer

 01/26/2016(1) 1         14 

(1)On January 26, 2016, we entered into an option cancellation and release agreement with each of Dr. Barry and Messrs. Shore and Milinazzo, pursuant to which each party agreed to cancel options with exercise prices ranging from $180 to $1,950 previously granted to him and in exchange we granted each party one share of common stock pursuant to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the 2013 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, a sub-plan of the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(2)Mr. Milinazzo served as our president, chief executive officer and director until his resignation from such positions on June 6, 2016 .

 79

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at December 31, 20162020

 

The following table shows information concerning unexercised options and unvested shares of restricted sharesstock outstanding as of December 31, 20162020 for each of our named executive officers.

 

Option Awards Stock Awards 
Name Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) exercisable  Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) unexercisable  Option exercise price ($)  Option expiration date Number of shares of stock that have not vested (#)  Market value of shares of stock that have not vested ($) 
Marvin Slosman (1)     60,794(2)  1.10  1/2/2030        
                 182,381(3)  62,010 
      391,762(4)  0.39  8/31/2030        
                 1,175,287(5)  399,598 
Craig Shore  11   -   8,312.50  07/25/2026        
                 4,000(6)  1,360 
      226,278(4)  0.39  8/31/2030        
                 678,834(7)  230,804 

 

Option Awards Stock Awards
Name 

Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#)

exercisable

 

Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#)

unexercisable( 12 )

 Option exercise price ($) Option expiration date Number of shares of stock that have not vested (#)  Market value of shares of stock that have not vested ($)
James Barry, Ph.D.             200(1) 500 
              62(2) 155 
              70,500(3) 176,250 
            70,500(4) 4.75  07/25/2026      
                   
Craig Shore             102(5) 255 
              39(6) 98 
              125(7) 313 
              17,625(8) 44,063 
           17,625(9) 4.75  07/25/2026      
                   
Agustin V. Gago    32,000(10) 1.86  10/24/2026      
     13,441(11) 1.86  10/24/2026      

(1)These restricted shares will vest on July 14, 2017.Mr. Slosman was appointed as chief executive officer effective as of January 1, 2020
(2)These options vest annually, with one-third vesting on each of January 2, 2021, January 2, 2022 and January 2, 2023.
(3)These RSU’s vest annually, with one-third vesting on each of January 2, 2021, January 2, 2022 and January 2, 2023.
(4)These options vest annually, with one-third vesting on each of August 31, 2021, August 31, 2022 and August 31, 2023.
(5)These RSU’s vest annually, with one-third vesting on each of August 31, 2021, August 31, 2022 and August 31, 2023.
(6)These restricted shares vest annually, with one-half vesting on each of January 26, 2017February 4, 2021 and January 26, 2018.February 4, 2022.
(3)These restricted shares will vest on August 1, 2017.
(4)These options will vest on July 25, 2017.
(5)These restricted shares will vest on January 29, 2017.
(6)These restricted shares will vest on January 31, 2017.
(7)These restricted shares vest annually, with one-half vesting on each of January 26, 2017 and January 26, 2018.
(8)These restricted sharesRestricted Stock vest annually, with one-third vesting on each of July 25, 2017, July 25, 2018August 31, 2021, August 31, 2022 and July 25, 2019.
(9)These options vest annually, with one-third vesting on each of July 25, 2017, July 25, 2018 and July 25, 2019.
(10)These options vest annually, with one-half vesting on each of October 24, 2017 and October 24, 2018.
(11)These options will vest on October 24, 2017.
(12)

On January 26, 2016, we entered into an option cancellation and release agreement with each of Dr. Barry and Mr. Shore, pursuant to which the parties agreed to cancel options with exercise prices ranging from $180 to $1,950.

August 31, 2023.

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 

There were no stock options exercised by our named executive officers during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016.2020.

 

2011 UMBRELLA Option Plan

 

On March 28, 2011, our board of directors and stockholders adopted and approved the InspireMD, Inc. 2011 UMBRELLA Option Plan, which was subsequently amended on October 31, 2011 and December 21, 2012. Under the InspireMD, Inc. 2011 UMBRELLA Option Plan, we have reserved 20,00011 shares of our common stock as awards to the employees, consultants, and service providers to InspireMD, Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide.

The InspireMD, Inc. 2011 UMBRELLA Option Plan currently consists of three components, the primary plan document that governs all awards granted under the InspireMD, Inc. 2011 UMBRELLA Option Plan, and two appendices: (i) Appendix A, designated for the purpose of grants of stock options and restricted stock awards to Israeli employees, consultants, officers and other service providers and other non-U.S. employees, consultants, and service providers, and (ii) Appendix B, which is the 2011 U.S. Equity Incentive Plan, designated for the purpose of grants of stock options and restricted stock awards to U.S. employees, consultants, and service providers who are subject to the U.S. income tax. On December 21, 2012, the stockholders approved the awarding of “incentive stock options” pursuant to the U.S. portion of the plan.

The purpose of the InspireMD, Inc. 2011 UMBRELLA Option Plan is to provide an incentive to attract and retain employees, officers, consultants, directors, and service providers whose services are considered valuable, to encourage a sense of proprietorship and to stimulate an active interest of such persons in our development and financial success. The InspireMD, Inc. 2011 UMBRELLA Option Plan is administered by our compensation committee. Unless terminated earlier by the board of directors, the InspireMD, Inc. 2011 UMBRELLA Option Plan will expire on March 27, 2021. We have no shares of common stock available for future issuance under our 2011 UMBRELLA Option Plan.

 

2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan

 

On December 16, 2013, our stockholders approved the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which was adopted by our board of directors on October 25, 2013.

 

The purpose of the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan is to provide an incentive to attract and retain employees, officers, consultants, directors, and service providers whose services are considered valuable, to encourage a sense of proprietorship and to stimulate an active interest of such persons in our development and financial success. The InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, dividend equivalent rights, and other awards, which may be granted singly, in combination, or in tandem. The InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan is administered by our compensation committee.

 

The InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan is intended to serve as an “umbrella” plan for us and our subsidiaries worldwide. Therefore, if so required, appendices may be added to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan in order to accommodate local regulations that do not correspond to the scope of the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Attached as Appendix A to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan is the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, for the purpose of making grants of stock options, restricted stock, and other stock incentive awards pursuant to Sections 102 and 3(i) of the Israeli Income Tax Ordinance (New Version), 1961 to Israeli employees and officers and any other service providers or control holders of us who are subject to Israeli Income Tax.

 

When the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan was adopted, a total of 20,00011 shares of common stock were reserved for awards under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

 

On September 9, 2015, our stockholders approved an amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance pursuant to awards under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan by 18,80011 shares of common stock, to a total of 38,80022 shares of common stock.

 

On May 24, 2016, our stockholders approved the second amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance pursuant to awards under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan by 400,000229 shares of common stock, to a total of 438,800251 shares of common stock.

On September 28, 2016, our stockholders approved the third amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance pursuant to awards under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan by 252,000144 shares of common stock, to a total of 690,800395 shares of common stock.

 

On October 24, 2018, our stockholders approved the fourth amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan to (i) increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance pursuant to awards under such InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan by 178,000 shares, to a total of 178,395 shares of common stock, and (ii) remove the cap on the number of shares of common stock with respect to which stock options or stock appreciation rights may be granted to certain executive officers of the Company during any calendar year.

On March 21, 2019, our stockholders approved the fifth amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase the total number of shares of common stock issuable under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan by 500,000 shares to a total of 678,395 shares of common stock.

On August 31, 2020, our stockholders approved the sixth amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan to increase the total number of shares of common stock issuable under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan by 6,500,000 shares to a total of 7,178,395 shares of common stock.

As of December 31, 2020, we had 2,306,956 shares of common stock available for future issuance under our 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

As of January 26, 2021, we had 2,222,963 shares of common stock available for future issuance under our 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

Director Compensation

 

The following table shows information concerning our directors other than James Barry, Ph.D., during the twelve months ended December 31, 2016.2020.

 

Name Fees Earned
or
Paid in Cash
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)
  Option
Awards(1)
($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 
Sol J. Barer, Ph.D.  17,500   -   71,831   -   89,331 
Isaac Blech  12,500   -   267,303   -   279,803 
Paul Stuka  19,500   -   57,738   -   77,238 
James J. Loughlin(2)  27,333   -   -   -  27,333 
Michael Berman  16,000   -   52,488   -  68,488 
Campbell Rogers, M.D.  13,500   -   48,738   -  62,238 
Thomas Kester  11,690   -   29,291   -  40,981 

(1)The amounts in this column reflect the dollar amounts recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Fair value of option awards with service conditions is based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the fair value of the underlying shares at the measurement date. Fair value of option awards with performance and market conditions is based on the Monte-Carlo option pricing model. For additional discussion of the valuation assumptions used in determining stock-based compensation and the grant date fair value for stock options, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies - Share-based compensation”.
(2)Mr. Loughlin resigned from our board as of May 24, 2016.

Name Shares Subject
to Options
 Grant Date Exercise
Price
 Vesting
Schedule
 Expiration Fair
Market
Value on
Grant
Date
Sol J. Barer, Ph.D.  4,892 (1)June 30, 2016 $8.25 Fully vested as of grant date  June 30, 2026  $26,250 
   20,000 (2)December 7, 2016 $3.04 One-third annually in 2017, 2018 and 2019 on the anniversary of the date of grant, provided that Dr. Barer is providing services to us or our subsidiaries or affiliates on the applicable vesting date.  December 7, 2026  $45,581 
Isaac Blech  7,801 (4)May 3, 2016 $12.50 Fully vested as of grant date  May 3, 2026  $66,902 
   23,401 (4)May 3, 2016 $12.50 One-third vesting upon the occurrence of any of the events below: (i) The date the company raises $15,000,000 or more in an offering of the issuer's shares of common stock or other equity interests. (ii) The date the company's market capitalization equals or exceeds $25,000,000. (iii) The date the company receives research coverage from 3 analysts at investment banks that ranked in the top 20 investment banks in terms of underwritings as of their most recently completed fiscal year and that did not cover the issuer prior to January 22, 2016. (iv) The date the company's market capitalization equals or exceeds 3 times the issuer's market capitalization as of January 22, 2016.  May 3, 2026  $161,496 

   1,941 (3)June 30, 2016 $8.25 Fully vested as of grant date  June 30, 2026  $10,417 
   12,500 (2)December 7, 2016 $3.04 One-third annually in 2017, 2018 and 2019 on the anniversary of the date of grant, provided that Mr. Blech is providing services to us or our subsidiaries or affiliates on the applicable vesting date.  December 7, 2026  $28,488 
Paul Stuka  5,451 (1)June 30, 2016 $8.25 Fully vested as of grant date  June 30, 2026  $29,250 
   12,500 (2)December 7, 2016 $3.04 One-third annually in 2017, 2018 and 2019 on the anniversary of the date of grant, provided that Mr. Stuka is providing services to us or our subsidiaries or affiliates on the applicable vesting date.  December 7, 2026  $28,488 
Michael Berman  4,472 (1)June 30, 2016 $8.25 Fully vested as of grant date  June 30, 2026  $24,000 
   12,500 (2)December 7, 2016 $3.04 One-third annually in 2017, 2018 and 2019 on the anniversary of the date of grant, provided that Mr. Berman is providing services to us or our subsidiaries or affiliates on the applicable vesting date.  December 7, 2026  $28,488 
Campbell Rogers, M.D.  3,774 (1)June 30, 2016 $8.25 Fully vested as of grant date  June 30, 2026  $20,250 
   12,500 (2)December 7, 2016 $3.04 One-third annually in 2017, 2018 and 2019 on the anniversary of the date of grant, provided that Mr. Rogers is providing services to us or our subsidiaries or affiliates on the applicable vesting date.  December 7, 2026  $28,488 
Thomas Kester  10,000 (4)September 6, 2016 $3.25 One-third annually in 2017, 2018 and 2019 on the anniversary of the date of grant, provided that Mr. Kester is providing services to us or our subsidiaries or affiliates on the applicable vesting date.  September 6, 2026  $23,594 
   2,500 (2)December 7, 2016 $3.04 One-third annually in 2017, 2018 and 2019 on the anniversary of the date of grant, provided that Mr. Kester is providing services to us or our subsidiaries or affiliates on the applicable vesting date.  December 7, 2026  $5,697 

(1)These options were granted in lieu of the cash compensation that was owed to them for their services as directors for the fourth calendar quarter of 2015 and the first and second quarters of 2016.
(2)These options were granted as the director’s 2016 annual director compensation.
(3)These options were granted in lieu of the cash compensation for their services as directors for the first and second calendar quarters of 2016.
(4)

These options were granted upon the directors’ appointment to our board of directors.

Name Fees Earned
or Paid in Cash
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)
  Option
Awards
($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 
Paul Stuka  47,250   93,191   27,792   -   168,233 
Michael Berman  29,750   61,633   18,381        -   109,764 
Campbell Rogers, M.D.  21,875   61,633   18,381   -   101,889 
Thomas Kester  35,875   61,633   18,381   -   115,889 
Gary Roubin, M.D.  5,503   78,854   23,516   -   107,873 

 

For the 20162020 calendar year, our board approved the following compensation for our independent directors: (i) a $40,000 stipend, payable quarterly to the chairman of the board; (ii) a $25,000 stipend, payable quarterly; (ii)quarterly to the other directors; (iii) annual committee chair compensation (effective April 1, 2014) of $12,000 for the chairman of the audit committee, $8,000 for the chairman of the compensation committee and $5,000 for the chairmen of the nominating and corporate governance committee and the research and development committee; (iii)and (iv) annual committee membership compensation (effective April 1, 2014) of $4,000 for members of the audit committee and the compensation committee and $2,000 for members of the nominating and corporate governance committee and the research and development committee; (iv)committee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, effective April 1, 2020, the Board approved a 50% decrease in the annual cash compensation for non-employee directors from an optionaggregate amount of $154,000 to purchase 12,500 shares of our common stock$77,000, and on July 1, 2020, the Board reinstated the original annual cash compensation for each board member; and (v) an option to purchase an additional 7,500 shares of our common stock for the chairman of the board.non-employee directors.

87

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The following table provides certain information as of December 31, 2016,2020, with respect to our equity compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance:

 

Plan Category Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights  Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights  Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) 
  (a)  (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders
  333,921   9.99   234,829 
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders
  3,500(1)  1,711.29    
Total  337,421   27.642    

Plan Category Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights  Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights  Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) 
  (a)  (b)  (c) 
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders
  1,169,665   37.69   2,306,956 
Equity compensation
plans not approved
by security holders
  205,615(1)  50.36    
Total  1,375,280   39.59   2,306,956 

(1)Comprised  of awards made to individuals outside the InspireMD, Inc. 2011 UMBRELLA Option Plan and 2013 Long Term Incentive Plan, as described below:

 

 Options issued to currentformer director: inIn November 2011, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of 2,9003 shares of common stock to Dr. Barer, thethen chairman of our board of directors.directors who resigned from the board of directors effective as of June 2, 2017. The exercise price of these options is $1,950$3,412,500 per share. Anshare and the options may be exercised at any time prior to the tenth anniversary of the grant date, pursuant to the nonqualified stock option to purchase 725 shares of common stock vestedagreement, as amended on April 11, 2013, when our common stock was first listed on a national securities exchange. An option to purchase 725 shares of common stock vested on May 10, 2013, after we received research coverage from a second investment bank that ranked in the top twenty investment banks in terms of life science underwritings. The option to purchase 1,450 shares of common stock vests in substantially equal monthly installments (with any fractional shares vesting on the last vesting date) on the last business day of each calendar month over a two year period from the date of grant, with the first installment vesting on November 30, 2011, provided that Dr. Barer is still providing services to us in some capacity as of each such vesting date.June 2, 2017.
   
 OptionsOn January, 2020, we issued to Mr. Marvin Slosman, our former vice presidentChief Executive Officer, President and Director, 182,381 shares of global marketingrestricted stock and strategy: in September 2013, we issued options to purchase 60060,794 shares of common stock , as inducement awards outside the Company’s 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
On October 6, 2020, we issued to David Blossom. The exercise priceMr. Patrick Jamnik, our Vice President of theseBusiness Development and Strategic Initiatives, options was $557.50 per share. Theto purchase 54,307 shares of our common stock, as inducement awards outside the Company’s 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
On November 3, 2020, we issued to Mr. Andrea Tommasoli, our Senior Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing, options vest annually with one-third vesting on September 16, 2014, September 16, 2015 and September 16, 2016. The options expire on December 16, 2018.to purchase 90,511 shares of our common stock, as inducement awards outside the Company’s 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan.

 

Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance

 

We currently have directors’ and officers’ liability insurance insuring our directors and officers against liability for acts or omissions in their capacities as directors or officers, subject to certain exclusions. Such insurance also insures us against losses which we may incur in indemnifying our officers and directors. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with key officers and directors and such persons shall also have indemnification rights under applicable laws, and our certificate of incorporation and bylaws.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On March 9, 2015, we closed a public offering of approximately 137,481 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase up to approximately 137,481 shares of common stock at a price of $137.50 per share, for gross proceeds of $13.7 million, before deducting placement agents’ fees and estimated offering expenses. Each purchaser received a warrant to purchase one share of common stock for each share of common stock that it purchased in the offering. The warrants have a term of exercise of five years from the date of issuance and an exercise price of $137.50. The purchasers in the offering included: Dr. Barer, the chairman of our board of directors, who purchased 10,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock, for a purchase price of $1,000,000, Osiris Investment Partners, L.P., of which Mr. Stuka, our director, is the principal and managing member, which purchased 2,500 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 2,500 shares of common stock, for a purchase price of $250,000 and Mr. Milinazzo, our former president, chief executive officer and director until his resignation from such positions on June 6, 2016, who purchased 500 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 500 shares of common stock, for a purchase price of $50,000.

On March 21, 2016, we closed a private placement of 41,323 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase up to 20,663 shares of our common stock with certain of our officers and directors. The purchasers in the private placement included: Dr. Barer, the chairman of our board of directors, who purchased 33,899 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 16,950 shares of common stock, for a purchase price of $500,000, Osiris Investment Partners, L.P., of which Mr. Stuka, our director, is the principal and managing member, which purchased 5,085 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 2,543 shares of common stock, for a purchase price of $75,000, Mr. Loughlin, who served as our director until May 24, 2016, purchased 2,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,000 shares of common stock, for a purchase price of $29,500 and Dr. Rogers, our director, who purchased 339 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 170 shares of common stock, for a purchase price of $5,000.

On July 7, 2016, we closed a public offering of 442,424 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and accompanying warrants to purchase up to 1,769,696 shares of common stock at a price of $33.00 per share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the accompanying warrant, for gross proceeds of approximately $14.6 million, before deducting placement agent fees and offering expenses payable by us. Each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into 4 shares of common stock reflecting a conversion price equal to $8.25 per share. The holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cumulative dividends at the rate per share of 15% per annum of the stated value for five years, payable in cash or common stock, at our discretion. The warrants are exercisable immediately and have a term of exercise of five years from the date of issuance and have an exercise price of $5.00 per share of common stock. The purchasers in the offering included: Dr. Barer, the chairman of our board of directors, who purchased 33,333 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 133,332 shares of common stock, for a purchase price of $1,099,989, Osiris Investment Partners, L.P., of which Mr. Stuka, our director, is the principal and managing member, which purchased 1,515 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 6,060 shares of common stock, for a purchase price of $49,995 and Mr. Stuka, who purchased 3,030 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 12,120 shares of common stock, for a purchase price of $99,990.

 

In accordance with our audit committee charter, the audit committee is required to approve all related party transactions. In general, the audit committee will review any proposed transaction that has been identified as a related party transaction under Item 404 of Regulation S-K, which means a transaction, arrangement or relationship in which we and any related party are participants in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000. A related party includes (i) a director, director nominee or executive officer of us, (ii) a security holder known to be an owner of more than 5% of our voting securities, (iii) an immediate family member of the foregoing or (iv) a corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is an executive, principal or similar control person or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest.

There were no related party transactions that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

 

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of February 15 , 2017January 26, 2021 by:

 

 each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5.0% of our common stock;
 each of our directors;
   
 each of the named executive officers; and
   
 all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

 

The percentages of common stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of the security, or investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of the security.

 

Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, each beneficial owner named in the table below has sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned and each person’s address is c/o InspireMD, Inc., 4 Menorat Hamaor St., Tel Aviv, Israel 6744832 .6744832. As of February 15 , 2017,January 27, 2021, we had 1,472,60671,455,570 shares outstanding.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares
Beneficially
Owned(1)
  Percentage
Beneficially
Owned(1)
  Number of Shares Beneficially
Owned(1)
  Percentage Beneficially
Owned(1)
 
5% Owners                

Renaissance Technologies LLC

  

109,742

(2)

  

7.45

%
Lind Global Macro Fund, LP  3,943,289(9)  

5.31

%
Officers and Directors                
Alan W. Milinazzo  5,396(3)  * 
Marvin Slosman  192,158(7)  * 
Craig Shore  56,713(4)  

3.85

%  1,507,903(2)  2.11%
Sol J. Barer, Ph.D.  235,329(5)  14.22%
James Barry, Ph.D.  71,368(6)  4.85%
Michael Berman  5,235(7)  *   16(3)  - 
Campbell Rogers, M.D.  4,826(8)  *   160,650(4)  * 
Paul Stuka  71,954(9)  4.69%  243,634(5)  * 
Isaac Blech  25,343(10)  1.69%
Thomas Kester  280(11)  *   210,641(6)  * 
Agustin V. Gago     * 
All directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons)  476,444   27.92%
Gary Roubin, M.D.  683,396(8)  *
All directors and executive officers as a group (7 persons)  2,998,398   4.20%

 

*Represents ownership of less than one percent.percent of outstanding shares.
  
(1)Shares of common stock beneficially owned and the respective percentages of beneficial ownership of common stock assumes the exercise of all options, warrants and other securities convertible into common stock beneficially owned by such person or entity currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 15 , 2017.January 26, 2021. Shares issuable pursuant to the exercise of stock options and warrants exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding and held by the holder of such options or warrants for computing the percentage of outstanding common stock beneficially owned by such person, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of outstanding common stock beneficially owned by any other person.
  
(2)Based on Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2017.
(3)Consists of shares of common stock. Mr. Milinazzo served as our president, chief executive officer and director until his resignation from such positions on June 6, 2016.
(4)Consists of (i) 18,2402,021 shares of common stock, (ii) options to purchase 11 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of January 26, 2021, (iii) 682,828 shares of restricted stock granted under the Israeli Appendix of the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan and (ii) 38,473(iv) 823,043 shares of restricted stock granted to employees under the Israeli Appendix of the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan held in trust, and with respect to which Mr. Shore was granted a proxy with the right to vote such shares at his discretion.
  
(5)(3)IncludesConsists of (i) 2 shares of common stock, (ii) options to purchase 8,49414 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 15 , 2017,January 26, 2021. Excludes 160,633 shares of common stock and restricted stock granted under the Israeli Appendix of InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan held in trust, with respect to which the trustee has a proxy with the right to vote such shares at his discretion.
(4)Consists of (i) 869 shares of common stock, (ii) warrants159,766 shares of restricted stock granted under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, (iii) options to purchase 160,66714 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 15 , 2017,January 26, 2021, and (iii) 13,700 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion ofSeries B Convertible Preferred Stock that are currently convertible within 60 days of  February 15 , 2017. Does not include 219,631 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, which shares were excluded because the warrants contain provisions that block conversion if such conversion will result in the holder having beneficial ownership of more than 4.99% of our common stock.
(6)Includes(iv) warrants to purchase 391 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 15 , 2017.January 26, 2021.
(5)
(7)Includes options to purchase 5,114 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of  February 15, 2017.
(8)Includes options to purchase 4,316 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 170 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of   February 15 , 2017.
(9)Paul Stuka is the principal and managing member of Osiris Investment Partners, L.P., and, as such, has beneficial ownership of (A) (i) 10,683255 shares of common stock, (ii) warrants to purchase 11,1038 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 15 , 2017, and (iii) 10,605 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion ofSeries B Convertible Preferred Stock that are currently convertible within 60 days of   February 15 , 2017, held by Osiris Investment Partners, L.P.,January 26, 2021 in addition to (B) personally holding (i) options to purchase 6,23315 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 15 , 2017,January 26, 2021, (ii) 241,550 shares of restricted stock granted under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, (iii) warrants to purchase 12,1207 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 15 , 2017,January 26, 2021, and (iii) 1,210(iv) 1,799 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock that are currently convertible within 60 days of  February 15 , 2017.stock.
  
(10)(6)Consists of (i) 50,867 shares of common stock, (ii) 159,766 shares of restricted stock granted under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and (iii) options to purchase 25,3438 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 15 , 2017.January 26, 2021.
  
(11)(7)Consists of (i) 55,550 shares of common stock.stock, (ii) 60,794 Restricted Stock Units granted outside the plan that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of January 26, 2021, (iii) options to purchase 20,264 shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of January 26, 2021, and (iv) 55,550 warrants to purchase shares of common stock that are currently exercisable.
(8)Consists of (i) 222,223 shares of common stock, (ii) 238,950 shares of restricted stock granted under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, and (iii) 222,223 warrants to purchase shares of common stock that are currently exercisable.
(9)The number of shares shown as beneficially owned by this stockholder is based on its Schedule 13G filed on June 9, 2020, as adjusted in order to correct an error in calculation in that Schedule 13G of which we are aware.

MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL TAX CONSEQUENCES

 

The following is a general summary of material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of shares of Preferred Stockcommon stock (“Common Stock”) in the offering, the acquisition, ownership, exercise, disposition, and lapse of pre-funded warrants (the “Pre-funded Warrants”) and Series G Warrants in the offering, and the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of shares of our common stockCommon Stock issuable upon exercise of the Pre-funded Warrants or upon conversion of the Preferred Stock (such common stock, the “Common Stock”).and Series G Warrants.

 

Scope of this Summary

 

This summary is for general information purposes only and does not purport to be a complete analysis of all potential U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Preferred Stock ,our Common Stock, Pre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants. Except as specifically set forth below, this summary does not discuss applicable tax reporting requirements. In addition, this summary does not take into account the individual facts and circumstances of any particular holder that may affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such holder. Accordingly, this summary is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal or U.S. federal income tax advice with respect to any particular holder. Each holder should consult its own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, state and local, and non-U.S. tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Preferred Stock ,shares of Common Stock, Pre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants.

 

No legal opinion from U.S. legal counsel or ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) has been requested, or will be obtained, regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Preferred Stock ,shares of Common Stock, Pre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants. This summary is not binding on the IRS, and the IRS is not precluded from taking a position that is different from, and contrary to, the positions taken in this summary.

Authorities

 

This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury Regulations, published rulings of the IRS, published administrative positions of the IRS, and U.S. court decisions that are applicable and, in each case, as in effect and available, as of the date of this prospectus. Any of the authorities on which this summary is based could be changed in a material and adverse manner at any time, and any such change could be applied on a retroactive basis.

 

U.S. Holders

 

As used in this summary, the term “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of Preferredshares of Common Stock, Pre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants acquired pursuant to this prospectus and a beneficial owner of Common Stock acquired upon conversion of the Preferred Stock , exercise of the Warrants or acquired as a distribution with respect to the Preferred Stock that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:

 

 an individual who is a citizen or resident of the U.S.;
   
 a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation) organized under the laws of the U.S., any state thereof or the District of Colombia;
   
 an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
   
 a trust that (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the U.S. and the control of one or more U.S. persons for all substantial decisions or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

 

Non-U.S. Holders

 

The term “Non-U.S. Holder” means any beneficial owner of Preferredshares of Common Stock, Pre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants acquired pursuant to this prospectus and a beneficial owner of Common Stock acquired upon conversion of the Preferred Stock , exercise of the Warrants or acquired as a distribution with respect to the Preferred Stock that is not a U.S. Holder.

Holders Subject to Special U.S. Federal Income Tax Rules

 

This summary deals only with persons or entities who acquire Preferredshares of Common Stock, Pre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants in the offering and who hold Preferred Stock ,shares of Common Stock, orPre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment purposes). This summary does not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be applicable to holders in light of their particular circumstances or to holders subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax law, such as (without limitation): banks, insurance companies, and other financial institutions; tax exempt or government organizations; dealers or traders in securities, commodities or foreign currencies; regulated investment companies; U.S. expatriates or former long-term residents of the U.S.; persons holding Preferredshares of Common Stock, ,Pre-funded Warrants or Common Stockand Series G Warrants as part of a straddle, appreciated financial position, synthetic security, hedge, conversion transaction or other integrated investment; persons holding Preferredshares of Common Stock, ,Pre-funded Warrants or Common Stockand Series G Warrants as a result of a constructive sale; persons that own, or are deemed to own, more than five percent of our capital stock; entities that acquire Preferredshares of Common Stock, ,Pre-funded Warrants or Common Stockand Series G Warrants that are treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes and partners in such partnerships; real estate investment trusts; U.S. Holders that have a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar; holders that acquired Preferredshares of Common Stock, ,Pre-funded Warrants or Common Stockand Series G Warrants in connection with the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as consideration for services; or holders that are “controlled foreign corporations” or “passive foreign investment companies.” Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including holders described immediately above, should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal, state and local, and non-U.S. tax consequences arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of Preferredshares of Common Stock, ,Pre-funded Warrants and Common Stock.Series G Warrants.

 

If an entity or arrangement that is classified as a partnership (or other “pass-through” entity) for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds Preferredshares of Common Stock, ,Pre-funded Warrants or Common Stock,and Series G Warrants, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to such entity and the partners (or other owners) of such entity generally will depend on the activities of the entity and the status of such partners (or owners). This summary does not address the tax consequences to any such owner or entity. Partners (or other owners) of entities or arrangements that are classified as partnerships or as “pass-through” entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences arising from and relating to the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Preferredshares of Common Stock, , Pre-funded

Warrants or Common Stock.

and Series G Warrants.

Tax Consequences Not Addressed

 

This summary does not address the U.S. state and local, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. federal alternative minimum tax, or non-U.S. tax consequences to holders of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Preferredshares of Common Stock , Warrants and Common Stock.Pre-funded Warrants. Each holder should consult its own tax advisors regarding the U.S. state and local, U.S. federal estate and gift, U.S. federal alternative minimum tax, and non-U.S. tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of Preferredshares of Common Stock , Warrants and Common Stock.Pre-funded Warrants.

 

Certain Material U.S. Federal Income Tax ConsequencesTreatment of the Purchase of Preferred Stock andPre-funded Warrants to U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders

 

Although the appropriate characterization of Pre-funded Warrants under the tax law is unsettled, it is likely that the Pre-funded Warrants will be treated as a class of our common stock for U.S. federal income tax purposes and a holder of Pre-funded Warrants should generally be taxed in the same manner as a holder of Common Stock, as described below. Each holder should consult his, her or its own tax advisor regarding the risks associated with the acquisition of Pre-funded Warrants pursuant to this offering (including potential alternative characterizations). The balance of this discussion generally assumes that the characterization described above is respected for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Allocation of Purchase Price and Characterization of Units

Each unit and pre-funded unit should be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as an investment unit consisting of one share of Common Stock (or Pre-funded Warrant, as the case may be), and one Series G Warrant to purchase one-half of one share of Common Stock. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, each holder must allocate the purchase price of Preferreda unit or pre-funded unit between that Common Stock (or Pre-funded Warrant, as applicable), and Warrants in this offering by U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders will be treated asone Series G Warrant based on the purchaserelative fair market value of two components: a component consistingeach at the time of Preferred Stock and a component consisting of Warrants, with each Warrant enabling its holder to purchase 4 shares of common stock.issuance. The purchase price for the Preferredallocated to each share of Common Stock, Pre-funded Warrant, and WarrantsSeries G Warrant generally will be allocated between these two componentsthe holder’s tax basis in proportion to their relative fair market values atsuch security, as the timecase may be. Each holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the Preferred Stock and Warrants are purchased by the holder. This allocation of the purchase price will establishfor a holder’s initial tax basis for U.S. federal income tax purposes for each share of Preferred Stock and Warrant.unit or pre-funded unit.

  

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders of the Exercise and Disposition of Pre-Funded Warrants and Series G Warrants

 

Exercise of Pre-Funded Warrants and Series G Warrants

 

A U.S. Holder generally will not recognize gain or loss on the exercise of a Pre-funded Warrant or Series G Warrant and related receipt of our common sharesCommon Stock (unless cash is received in lieu of the issuance of a fractional share of Common Stock). A U.S. Holder’s initial tax basis in Common Stock received on the exercise of a Pre-funded Warrant or Series G Warrant should be equal to the sum of (a) such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in such Pre-funded Warrant or Series G Warrant plus (b) the exercise price paid by such U.S. Holder on the exercise of such Pre-funded Warrant and (c) in the case of aor Series C Warrant, the amount of the solicitation fee .G Warrant. A U.S. Holder’s holding period for Common Stock received on the exercise of a Pre-funded Warrant should generally include the period during which the U.S. Holder held the Pre-funded Warrant. A U.S. Holder’s holding period for Common Stock received upon exercise of a Series G Warrant should generally begin on the date that such Warrant is exercised byday after such U.S. Holder.Holder exercises the Series G Warrant. The U.S. federal income tax treatment of a cashless exercise of Pre-funded Warrants or Series G Warrants into our Common Stock is unclear and the tax consequences of a cashless exercise could differ from the tax consequences described in the preceding paragraph. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of a cashless exercise of Pre-funded Warrants or Series G Warrants.

Disposition of Pre-Funded Warrants and Series G Warrants

 

A U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss on the sale or other taxable disposition of a Pre-funded Warrant (including upon lapse or expiration)Series G Warrant in an amount equal to the difference, if any, between (a) the amount of cash plus the fair market value of any property received and (b) such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the Pre-funded Warrant or Series G Warrant sold or otherwise disposed of. Any such gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the Pre-funded Warrant or Series G Warrant is held for more than one year. Long-term capital gains recognized by certain non-corporate U.S. Holders (including individuals) will generally be subject to a preferential rate of U.S. federal income tax. Deductions for capital losses are subject to limitations.

 

If a Pre-funded Warrant or Series G Warrant expires without being exercised, a U.S. Holder will generally recognize a capital loss in an amount equal to such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the Pre-funded Warrant or Series G Warrant. This loss will be long-term capital loss if, at the time of the expiration, the U.S. Holder’s holding period in the Pre-funded Warrant or Series G Warrant is more than one year.

Certain Adjustments to the Pre-Funded Warrants and Series G Warrants

 

Under Section 305 of the Code, an adjustment to the number of shares of Common Stock that will be issued on the exercise of the Pre-funded Warrants or Series G Warrants, or an adjustment to the exercise price of the Pre-funded Warrants or Series G Warrants, may be treated as a constructive distribution to a U.S. Holder of the Pre-funded Warrants or Series G Warrants if, and to the extent that, such adjustment has the effect of increasing such U.S. Holder’s proportionate interest in our “earnings and profits” or assets, depending on the circumstances of such adjustment (for example, if such adjustment is to compensate for a distribution of cash or other property to our shareholders). Adjustments to the exercise price of a Pre-funded Warrant or Series G Warrant made pursuant to a bona fide reasonable adjustment formula that has the effect of preventing dilution of the interest of the holders of the Pre-funded Warrants or Series G Warrants should generally not result in a constructive distribution. (See the more detailed discussion of the rules applicable to distributions made by us at “U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders of the Acquisition, Ownership and Disposition of Preferred Stock and Common Stock - Distributions” below).

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to U.S. Holders of the Acquisition, Ownership and Disposition of Preferred Stock and Common Stock

 

Distributions

 

Cash distributions made on Preferred Stock andour Common Stock generally will be included in a U.S. Holder’s income as ordinary dividend income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits (determined under U.S. federal income tax principles) as of the end of our taxable year in which the distribution occurs. To the extent those distributions exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits, they will constitute a return of capital and will first reduce a U.S. Holder’s basis in Preferred Stock or Common Stock, but not below zero, and then will be treated as gain from the sale of stock, which will be taxable according to rules discussed under the heading “Sale, Certain Redemptions or Other Taxable DispositionDispositions of   Preferred Stock and Common Stock” below. (As of December 2016, we have no current or accumulated earning and profits.) Cash dividends received by non-corporate U.S. Holders are generally taxed at a maximum tax rate of 20%, provided certain holding period and other requirements are satisfied. Cash distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of a U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Preferred Stock or Common Stock and thereafter as capital gain from the sale or exchange of such Preferred Stock or Common Stock, which will be taxable according to rules discussed under the heading “Sale, Certain Redemptions or Other Taxable Dispositions of   Preferred Stock and Common Stock,” below. Cash dividends received by a corporate holder may be eligible for a dividends received deduction, subject to applicable limitations.

 

U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors concerning the tax treatment of distributions of Common Stock made on the Preferred Stock .

Sale, Certain Redemptions or Other Taxable Dispositions of Preferred Stock and Common Stock

 

Upon the sale, redemption, or other taxable disposition of Preferred Stock orour Common Stock, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between (i) the amount of cash and the fair market value of any property received upon such taxable disposition and (ii) the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the Preferred Stock or Common Stock. Such capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if a U.S. Holder’s holding period in the Preferred Stock or Common Stock is more than one year at the time of the taxable disposition. Long-term capital gains recognized by non-corporate U.S. Holders will generally be subject to a maximum U.S. federal income tax rate of 20%. Deductions for capital losses are subject to limitations.

Conversion of Preferred Stock in Exchange for Common Stock

A U.S. Holder will not recognize any gain or loss by reason of receiving Common Stock in exchange for our Preferred Stock upon conversion of the Preferred Stock . A U.S. Holder’s initial tax basis in Common Stock received upon the conversion of its Preferred Stock should be equal to such U.S. Holder’s tax basis in such Preferred Stock . A U.S. Holder’s holding period for Common Stock received upon the conversion of its Preferred Stock should carry over from the converted Preferred Stock.

Constructive Dividends

The conversion rate of the Preferred Stock is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. Adjustments that have the effect of increasing the proportionate interest of holders of our Preferred Stock in our assets or earnings can give rise to deemed dividend income to such holders. Similarly, a failure to adjust the conversion price to reflect a stock dividend or other events increasing the proportionate interest of the holders of Common Stock can, in some circumstances, give rise to deemed dividend income to such common stock holders. Such deemed dividend income is taxable to such holders in the taxable year of the adjustment (or failure to adjust). The contemplated adjustments to the Preferred Stock conversion rate under this prospectus should not be treated as a deemed dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

 

Other U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences Applicable to U.S. Holders

 

Additional Tax on Passive Income

 

Individuals, estates and certain trusts whose income exceeds certain thresholds will be required to pay a 3.8% Medicare surtax on “net investment income” including, among other things, dividends on and net gain from the disposition of Preferred Stock or Common Stock.our securities. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect, if any, of this tax on their ownership and disposition of Preferred Stock and Common Stock.our securities.

 

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

 

Information reporting requirements generally will apply to payments of dividends on PreferredCommon Stock and Common Stock(and Pre-Funded Warrants or Series G Warrants, as applicable) and to the proceeds of a sale of PreferredCommon Stock, Pre-Funded Warrants or Common StockSeries G Warrants paid to a U.S. Holder unless the U.S. Holder is an exempt recipient (such as a corporation). Backup withholding will apply to those payments if the U.S. Holder fails to provide its correct taxpayer identification number, or certification of exempt status, or if the U.S. Holder is notified by the IRS that it has failed to report in full payments of interest and dividend income. Backup withholding is not an additional tax, and any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules generally will be allowed as a refund or a credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided the required information is furnished in a timely manner to the IRS.

 

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders of the Acquisition, Ownership and Disposition of Preferred Stock and Common Stock

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders of the Exercise and Disposition ofAdjustments to the Pre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants

 

Exercise of Pre-Funded Warrants and Series G Warrants

 

A Non-U.S. Holder generally will not recognize gain or loss on the exercise of a Pre-funded Warrant or Series G Warrant and related receipt of Common Stock (unless cash is received in lieu of the issuance of a fractional share of Common Stock and certain other conditions are present, as discussed below under “Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of Preferred Stock and Common Stock”). A Non-U.S. Holder’s initial tax basis in Common Stock received on the exercise of a Pre-funded Warrant or Series G Warrants should be equal to the sum of (a) such Non-U.S. Holder’s tax basis in such Pre-funded Warrant or Series G Warrant plus (b) the exercise price paid by such Non-U.S. Holder on the exercise of such Pre-funded Warrant and (c) in the case of aor Series C Warrant, the amount of the solicitation fee.G Warrant. A Non-U.S. Holder’s holding period for Common Stock received on the exercise of a Pre-funded Warrant should generally include the period during which the Non-U.S. Holder held the Pre-funded Warrant. A Non-U.S. Holder’s holding period for Common Stock received upon exercise of a Series G Warrant should generally begin on the date that such Warrant is exercised byday after such Non-U.S. Holder.Holder exercises the Series G Warrant. However, no discussion is provided herein regarding the U.S. federal income tax treatment on the exercise of a Pre-funded Warrant or Series G Warrants on a cashless basis, and Non-U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors as to the exercise of a Pre-funded Warrant or Series G Warrant on a cashless basis.

Certain Adjustments to the Pre-Funded Warrants and Series G Warrants

 

Under Section 305 of the Code, an adjustment to the number of shares of Common Stock that will be issued on the exercise of the Pre-funded Warrants or Series G Warrants, or an adjustment to the exercise price of the Pre-funded Warrants or Series G Warrants, may be treated as a constructive distribution to a Non-U.S. Holder of the Pre-funded Warrants or Series G Warrants if, and to the extent that, such adjustment has the effect of increasing such Non-U.S. Holder’s proportionate interest in our “earnings and profits” or assets, depending on the circumstances of such adjustment (for example, if such adjustment is to compensate for a distribution of cash or other property to our shareholders). See the more detailed discussion of the rules applicable to distributions made by us under the heading “Dividends”“U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders of the Acquisition, Ownership and Disposition of Common Stock – Distributions” below.

 

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders of the Acquisition, Ownership and Disposition of Preferred Stock and Common Stock

Conversion of Preferred Stock in Exchange for Common Shares

A Non-U.S. holder will not recognize any gain or loss by reason of receiving Common Stock, in exchange for our Preferred Stock upon conversion of the Preferred Stock . A Non-U.S. Holder’s initial tax basis in Common Stock received upon the conversion of its Preferred Stock should be equal to such Non-U.S. Holder’s tax basis in its converted Preferred Stock . A Non-U.S. Holder’s holding period for Common Stock received upon the conversion of its Preferred Stock should carry over from the Preferred Stock .

Constructive Dividends

The conversion rate of our Preferred Stock is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. Adjustments that have the effect of increasing the proportionate interest of holders of our Preferred Stock in our assets or earnings can give rise to deemed dividend income to such holders. Similarly, a failure to adjust the conversion price to reflect a stock dividend or other events increasing the proportionate interest of the holders of Common Stock can, in some circumstances, give rise to deemed dividend income to such common stock holders. Such deemed dividend income is taxable to such holders in the taxable year of the adjustment (or failure to adjust). Any such deemed dividend with respect to Common Stock or Preferred Stock would be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax on dividend income to the same extent as an actual cash distribution, as described below under “U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences to Non-U.S. Holders of the Acquisition, OwnershipPre-Funded Warrants and Disposition of Preferred Stock and Common Stock — Distributions.” Because deemed distributions would not give rise to any cash from which any applicable withholding tax could be satisfied, we may withhold the U.S. federal tax on such dividend from any cash, shares of common stock or Preferred Stock , or sales proceeds otherwise payable to a non-U.S. holder. The contemplated adjustments to the Preferred Stock conversion rate under this prospectus should not be treated as a deemed dividend for U.S. federal income tax purposes.Series G Warrants

 

Distributions

 

Cash distributions on Preferred Stock or Common Stock will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from our current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. To the extent those distributions exceed our current and accumulated earnings and profits, they will constitute a return of capital and will first reduce a Non-U.S. Holder’s basis in Preferred Stock or Common Stock, but not below zero, and then will be treated as gain from the sale of stock, which will be taxable according to rules discussed under the heading “Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of Preferred Stock and Common Stock,” below. (As of December 2016, we have no current or accumulated earning and profits.) Any cash dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder with respect to Preferred Stock or Common Stock generally will be subject to withholding tax at a 30% gross rate, subject to any exemption or lower rate under an applicable treaty if the Non-U.S. Holder provides us with a properly executed IRS Form W-8BEN-E or W-8BEN. A Non-U.S. Holder that provides us with a properly executed IRS Form W-8ECI (or other applicable form) relating to income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the U.S. will not be subject to the 30% withholding tax.

Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors concerning the tax treatment of distributions of Common Stock made on the Preferred Stock .

Cash dividends that are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the U.S. are not subject to the withholding tax (assuming proper certification and disclosure), but instead are subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis at applicable graduated individual or corporate rates, subject to an applicable treaty that provides otherwise. Any such effectively connected income received by a non-U.S. corporation may, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional branch profits tax on its effectively connected earnings and profits at a 30% rate, subject to any exemption or lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

 

A Non-U.S. Holder of Preferred Stock or Common Stock who wishes to claim the benefit of an applicable treaty rate or exemption is required to satisfy certain certification and other requirements. If a Non-U.S. Holder is eligible for an exemption from or a reduced rate of U.S. withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty, it may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by timely filing an appropriate claim for refund with the IRS.

 

Sale or Other Taxable Disposition of Preferred Stock , Common Stock, Pre-Funded Warrants and WarrantSeries G Warrants

 

In general, a Non-U.S. Holder of Preferred Stock ,shares of Common Stock, orPre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on gain recognized from a sale, exchange, or other taxable disposition of such Preferred Stock ,shares of Common Stock, orPre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants, unless:

 

 the gain is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business carried on by the Non-U.S. Holder (and, where an income tax treaty applies, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment of the Non-U.S. Holder), in which case the Non-U.S. Holder will be subject to tax on the net gain from the sale at regular graduated U.S. federal income tax rates, and if the Non-U.S. Holder is a corporation, may be subject to an additional U.S. branch profits tax at a gross rate equal to 30% of its effectively connected earnings and profits for that taxable year, subject to any exemption or lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty;
   
 the Non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the U.S. for 183 days or more in the taxable year of disposition and certain other conditions are met, in which case the Non-U.S. Holder will be subject to a 30% tax on the gain from the sale, which may be offset by U.S. source capital losses; or
   
 we are or have been a “United States real property holding corporation” (“USRPHC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes at any time during the shorter of the Non-U.S. Holder’s holding period or the 5-year period ending on the date of disposition of Preferred Stock ,shares of Common Stock, orPre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants; provided, with respect to the Preferred Stock ,shares of Common Stock, orPre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants, that as long as Common Stock is regularly traded on an established securities market as determined under the Treasury Regulations (the “Regularly Traded Exception”), a Non-U.S. Holder would not be subject to taxation on the gain on the sale of Preferred Stock ,shares of Common Stock, orPre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants under this rule unless the Non-U.S. Holder has owned more than 5% of Common Stock at any time during such 5-year or shorter period (a “5% Shareholder”). In determining whether a Non-U.S. Holder is a 5% Shareholder, such holder’s Pre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants may be included in such determination. In addition, certain attribution rules apply in determining ownership for this purpose. While the Preferred Stock andshares of Common Stock will be listed on the NYSE MKT and therefore may satisfy the Regularly Traded Exception, becausesince neither the Pre-funded Warrants nor the Series G Warrants are not expected to be listed on a securities market, the Pre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants are unlikely to qualify for the Regularly Traded Exception. Non-U.S. Holders should be aware that we have made no determination as to whether we are or have been a USRPHC, and we can provide no assurances that we are not and will not become a USRPHC in the future. In addition, in the event that we are or become a USRPHC, we can provide no assurances that the Preferred Stock ,shares of Common Stock, Pre-funded Warrants or Series G Warrants will meet the Regularly Traded Exception at the time a Non-U.S. Holder purchases such securities or sells, exchanges or otherwise disposes of such securities. Non-U.S. Holders should consult with their own tax advisors regarding the consequences to them of investing in a USRPHC. As a USRPHC, a Non-U.S. Holder will be taxed as if any gain or loss were effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business as described above in “Dividends”“Distributions” in the event that (i) such holder is a 5% Shareholder, or (ii) the Regularly Traded Exception is not satisfied during the relevant period.

 92

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

 

Generally, we must report annually to the IRS and to Non-U.S. Holders the amount of cash dividends paid on the Preferredshares of Common Stock and Common Stock(and Pre-Funded Warrants or Series G Warrants, as applicable) to Non-U.S. Holders and the amount of tax, if any, withheld with respect to those payments. Copies of the information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which a Non-U.S. Holder resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty.

 

In general, a Non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to backup withholding with respect to payments of dividends that we make, provided we receive a statement meeting certain requirements to the effect that the Non-U.S. Holder is not a U.S. person and we do not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the holder is a U.S. person, as defined under the Code, that is not an exempt recipient. The requirements for the statement will be met if (1) the Non-U.S. Holder provides its name, address and U.S. taxpayer identification number, if any, and certifies, under penalty of perjury, that it is not a U.S. person (which certification may be made on IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E, as applicable) or (2) a financial institution holding the instrument on behalf of the Non-U.S. Holder certifies, under penalty of perjury, that such statement has been received by it and furnishes us or our paying agent with a copy of the statement. In addition, a Non-U.S. Holder will be subject to information reporting and, depending on the circumstances, backup withholding with respect to payments of the proceeds of a sale of Preferred Stock ,shares of Common Stock, Pre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants within the U.S. or conducted through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries, unless the statement described above has been received, and we do not have actual knowledge or reason to know that a holder is a U.S. person, as defined under the Code, that is not an exempt recipient, or the Non-U.S. Holder otherwise establishes an exemption. Backup withholding is not an additional tax and any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against a Non-U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided the required information is furnished in a timely manner to the IRS.

 

Rules Relating to Foreign Accounts

 

Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations thereunder (commonly referred to as FATCA)“FATCA”) generally impose a U.S. federal withholding tax ofat a 30% rate on certain payments made to a “foreign financial institution” (as speciallyor a “non-financial foreign entity” (each as defined under these rules) unlessin the Code), unless: (1) in the case of a foreign financial institution, such institution enters into an agreement with the U.S. governmentTreasury Department to withhold on certain payments and to collect and provide to the U.S. tax authorities substantial information regarding certain U.S. account holders, of such institution (which includes certain equity and debt holders of such institution, as well asincluding certain account holders that are foreign entities with U.S. owners) or an exemption applies. FATCA also generally will impose a U.S. federal withholding taxowners, (2) in the case of 30% on certain payments made to a non-financial foreign entity, unless such entity provides the withholding agent with a certification that it does not have any “substantial United States owners” (as defined in the Code) or a certification identifying certainits direct andor indirect U.S.substantial United States owners, ofor (3) the foreign financial institution or non-financial foreign entity orotherwise qualifies for an exemption applies. An intergovernmental agreement betweenfrom these rules and provides appropriate documentation (such as an IRS Form W-8BEN-E).

The withholding provisions under FATCA generally apply to dividends on our Common Stock, Pre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants and, subject to the United Statesproposed regulations described in the next sentence, will apply to gross proceeds of a sale or other disposition of our Common Stock, Pre-funded Warrants and anSeries G Warrants. The Treasury Department has released proposed regulations (the preamble to which specifies that taxpayers are permitted to rely on them pending finalization) which, if finalized in their present form, would eliminate the federal withholding tax of 30% applicable foreign country may modify these requirements.to the gross proceeds of a disposition of our Common Stock, Pre-funded Warrants and Series G Warrants. Under certain circumstances, a non-U.S. holderNon-U.S. Holder might be eligible for refunds or credits of such taxes.

An intergovernmental agreement between the U.S. and the non-U.S. entity’s jurisdiction may modify these requirements. Non-U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the possible implications of FATCA currently applies to dividends paid on the Preferredtheir investment in our Common Stock, Pre-funded Warrants and Common stock. FATCA will also apply to gross proceeds from sales or other dispositions of the Preferred Stock and Common stock after December 31, 2018.Series G Warrants.

THE PRECEDING SUMMARY OF U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY AND IS NOT LEGAL OR TAX ADVICE. ACCORDINGLY, PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN ADVISORS ON THE U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP, AND DISPOSITION OF COMMON STOCK, PRE-FUNDED WARRANTS and Series G Warrants, AND ON THE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY CHANGES IN APPLICABLE LAW. 

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES

 

We are offering (i) up to 19,677,292 units, each unit consisting of one share of our common stock and/or one Series G Warrant to purchase one-half of one share of our common stock and (ii) up to 19,677,292 pre-funded units, each pre-funded unit consisting of one pre-funded warrant to purchase one share of our common stock and/or one Series G Warrant to purchase one-half of share of our common stock. For each pre-funded unit we sell, the number of units we are offering will be decreased on a one-for-one basis. The share of common stock and accompanying Series G Warrant included in each unit will be issued separately and will be immediately separable upon issuance, and the pre-funded warrant to purchase one share of common stock and the accompanying Series G Warrant included in each pre-funded unit will be issued separately and will be immediately separable upon issuance. The units and pre-funded units will not be issued or certificated. We are also registering the shares of common stock included in the units and the shares of common stock issuable from time to time upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants included in the pre-funded units and Series G warrants included in the units and the pre-funded units offered hereby.

We have authorized 155,000,000 shares of capital stock, par value $0.0001 per share, authorized, of which 150,000,000 are shares of common stock and 5,000,000 are shares of “blank check” preferred stock. On February 15 , 2017,January 27, 2021, there were 1,472,60671,455,570 shares of common stock, and 311,521no shares of Series A Preferred Stock, 17,303 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, issued and outstanding2,343 shares of Series C Preferred Stock and no shares of Series CD Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series D Preferred Stock”) issued and outstanding. We currently have 20,000200,000 shares of preferred stock designated as Series A Preferred Stock, 500,000 shares of preferred stock designated as Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, and will have1,172,000 shares of preferred stock designated as Series C ConvertiblePreferred Stock and 750 shares of preferred stock designated as Series D Preferred Stock. The authorized and unissued shares of common stock and the authorized and undesignated shares of preferred stock are available for issuance without further action by our stockholders, unless such action is required by applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange on which our securities may be listed. Unless approval of our stockholders is so required, our board of directors does not intend to seek stockholder approval for the issuance and sale of our common stock or preferred stock.

 

Units Being OfferedThe foregoing description is intended as a summary and is qualified in this Offeringits entirety by reference to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, the bylaws, and the respective certificates of designations for our Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock.

 

We are offering up to 750,000 units to purchasers in this offering, with each unit consisting of:

 (i)96one share of Preferred Stock, which is convertible into 4 shares of common stock;
   
(ii)a five-year Series B Warrant to purchase 4 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to 125% of the conversion price of the Preferred Stock; and
(iii)a six-month Series C Warrant to purchase 4 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to the conversion price of the Preferred Stock.

Units will not be issued or certificated. The shares of Preferred Stock and the Warrants will be issued separately but can only be purchased together in this offering. This prospectus also covers 3,000,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Stock, 3,000,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the Series B Warrants, and 3,000,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the Series C Warrants. The material terms and provisions of our common stock, which underlies the Preferred Stock and the Warrants, and each other class of securities which qualifies or limits the foregoing, are described in this section.

 

Common Stock

 

The holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share. Our certificate of incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting. Our directors are divided into three classes. At each annual meeting of stockholders, directors elected to succeed those directors whose terms expire are elected for a term of office to expire at the third succeeding annual meeting of stockholders after their election. The holders of our common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by our board of directors out of legally available funds; however, the current policy of our board of directors is to retain earnings, if any, for operations and growth. Upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, the holders of our common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets that are legally available for distribution. The holders of our common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of our common stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock, which may be designated solely by action of our board of directors and issued in the future.

 

The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Action Stock Transfer Corp. The transfer agent’s address is 2469 E. Fort Union Blvd., Suite 214, Salt Lake City, Utah 84121. Our common stock is listed on the NYSE MKTAmerican under the symbol “NSPR.”

Pre-Funded Warrants Being Offered in this Offering

The following summary of certain terms and provisions of pre-funded warrants included in the pre-funded units that are being offered hereby is not complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the provisions of the pre-funded warrant, the form of which is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Prospective investors should carefully review the terms and provisions of the form of pre-funded warrant for a complete description of the terms and conditions of the pre-funded warrants. The pre-funded warrants will be issued separately from the accompanying Series G Warrants, and may be transferred separately immediately thereafter.

Duration and Exercise Price

Each pre-funded warrant offered hereby will have an initial exercise price per share equal to $            . The pre-funded warrants will be immediately exercisable and may be exercised at any time until the pre-funded warrants are exercised in full. The exercise price and number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise is subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of stock dividends, stock splits, reorganizations or similar events affecting our common stock and the exercise price.

Exercisability

The pre-funded warrants will be exercisable, at the option of each holder, in whole or in part, by delivering to us a duly executed exercise notice accompanied by payment in full for the number of shares of our common stock purchased upon such exercise (except in the case of a cashless exercise as discussed below). A holder (together with its affiliates) may not exercise any portion of the pre-funded warrant to the extent that the holder would own more than 4.99% of the outstanding common stock immediately after exercise, except that upon at least 61 days’ prior notice from the holder to us, the holder may increase the amount of ownership of outstanding stock after exercising the holder’s pre-funded warrants up to 9.99% of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the exercise, as such percentage ownership is determined in accordance with the terms of the pre-funded warrants. Purchasers of pre-funded warrants in this offering may also elect prior to the issuance of the pre-funded warrants to have the initial exercise limitation set at 9.99% of our outstanding common stock.

Cashless Exercise

If, at the time a holder exercises its pre-funded warrants, a registration statement registering the issuance of the shares of common stock underlying the pre-funded warrants under the Securities Act is not then effective or available for the issuance of such shares, then in lieu of making the cash payment otherwise contemplated to be made to us upon such exercise in payment of the aggregate exercise price, the holder may elect instead to receive upon such exercise (either in whole or in part) the net number of shares of common stock determined according to a formula set forth in the pre-funded warrants.

Transferability

Subject to applicable laws, a pre-funded warrant may be transferred at the option of the holder upon surrender of the pre-funded warrant to us together with the appropriate instruments of transfer.

Fractional Shares

No fractional shares of common stock will be issued upon the exercise of the pre-funded warrants. Rather, the number of shares of common stock to be issued will, at our election, either be rounded up to the nearest whole number or we will pay a cash adjustment in respect of such final fraction in an amount equal to such fraction multiplied by the exercise price.

Trading Market

There is no trading market available for the pre-funded warrants on any securities exchange or nationally recognized trading system. We do not intend to list the pre-funded warrants on any securities exchange or nationally recognized trading system. The common stock issuable upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants is currently listed on the NYSE American under the symbol “NSPR.”

Right as a Stockholder

Except as otherwise provided in the pre-funded warrants or by virtue of such holder’s ownership of shares of our common stock, the holders of the pre-funded warrants do not have the rights or privileges of holders of our common stock, including any voting rights, until they exercise their pre-funded warrants.

Fundamental Transaction

In the event of a fundamental transaction, as described in the pre-funded warrants and generally including any reorganization, recapitalization or reclassification of our common stock, the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of our properties or assets, our consolidation or merger with or into another person, the acquisition of more than 50% of our outstanding common stock, or any person or group becoming the beneficial owner of 50% of the voting power represented by our outstanding common stock, the holders of the pre-funded warrants will be entitled to receive upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants the kind and amount of securities, cash or other property that the holders would have received had they exercised the pre-funded warrants immediately prior to such fundamental transaction.

Series G Warrants Being Offered in this Offering

The following summary of certain terms and provisions of Series G Warrants included in the units and the pre-funded units that are being offered hereby is not complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by, the provisions of the Series G Warrants, the form of which is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. Prospective investors should carefully review the terms and provisions of the form of Series G Warrant for a complete description of the terms and conditions of the Series G Warrants.

Duration and Exercise Price

Each Series G Warrant included in the units and the pre-funded units offered hereby will have an initial exercise price equal to $ 0.84 per share of common stock. The Series G Warrants will be immediately exercisable and will expire on the fifth anniversary of the original issuance date. The exercise price and number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise is subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of stock dividends, stock splits, reorganizations or similar events affecting our common stock and the exercise price. The Series G Warrants will be issued separately from the common stock included in the units, or the pre-funded warrants included in the pre-funded units, as the case may be. A Series G Warrant to purchase one-half of one share of our common stock will be included in each unit or pre-funded unit purchased in this offering.

Cashless Exercise

If, at the time a holder exercises its Series G Warrants, a registration statement registering the issuance of the shares of common stock underlying the Series G Warrants under the Securities Act is not then effective or available for the issuance of such shares, then in lieu of making the cash payment otherwise contemplated to be made to us upon such exercise in payment of the aggregate exercise price, the holder may elect instead to receive upon such exercise (either in whole or in part) the net number of shares of common stock determined according to a formula set forth in the Series G Warrants.

Exercisability

The Series G Warrants will be exercisable, at the option of each holder, in whole or in part, by delivering to us a duly executed exercise notice accompanied by payment in full for the number of shares of our common stock purchased upon such exercise (except in the case of a cashless exercise as discussed below). A holder (together with its affiliates) may not exercise any portion of the Series G Warrant to the extent that the holder would own more than 4.99% of the outstanding common stock immediately after exercise, except that upon at least 61 days’ prior notice from the holder to us, the holder may increase the amount of ownership of outstanding stock after exercising the holder’s Series G Warrants up to 9.99% of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the exercise, as such percentage ownership is determined in accordance with the terms of the Series G Warrants. Purchasers of Series G Warrants in this offering may also elect prior to the issuance of the Series G Warrants to have the initial exercise limitation set at 9.99% of our outstanding common stock.

Fractional Shares

No fractional shares of common stock will be issued upon the exercise of the Series G Warrants. Rather, the number of shares of common stock to be issued will be rounded to the nearest whole number, or the Company shall pay a cash adjustment in respect of the fractional share.

Transferability

Subject to applicable laws, the Series G Warrants may be offered for sale, sold, transferred or assigned without our consent. There is currently no trading market for the Series G Warrants.

Exchange Listing

There is no trading market available for the Series G Warrants on any securities exchange or nationally recognized trading system. We do not intend to list the Series G Warrants on any securities exchange or nationally recognized trading system. The common stock issuable upon exercise of the Series G Warrants is currently listed on the NYSE American under the symbol “NSPR.”

Right as a Stockholder

Except as otherwise provided in the Series G Warrants or by virtue of such holder’s ownership of shares of our common stock, the holders of the Series G Warrants do not have the rights or privileges of holders of our common stock, including any voting rights, until they exercise their Series G Warrants.

Fundamental Transaction

In the event of a fundamental transaction, as described in the Series G Warrants and generally including any reorganization, recapitalization or reclassification of our common stock, the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of our properties or assets, our consolidation or merger with or into another person, the acquisition of more than 50% of our outstanding common stock, or any person or group becoming the beneficial owner of 50% of the voting power represented by our outstanding common stock, the holders of the Series G Warrants will be entitled to receive upon exercise of the Series G Warrants the kind and amount of securities, cash or other property that the holders would have received had they exercised the Series G Warrants immediately prior to such fundamental transaction.

 

Preferred Stock

 

The board of directors is authorized, subject to any limitations prescribed by law, without further vote or action by the stockholders, to issue from time to time shares of preferred stock in one or more series. Each such series of preferred stock shall have such number of shares, designations, preferences, voting powers, qualifications, and special or relative rights or privileges as shall be determined by the board of directors, which may include, among others, dividend rights, voting rights, liquidation preferences, conversion rights and preemptive rights. Issuance of preferred stock by our board of directors may result in such shares having dividend and/or liquidation preferences senior to the rights of the holders of our common stock and could dilute the voting rights of the holders of our common stock.

Prior to the issuance of shares of each series of preferred stock, the board of directors is required by the Delaware General Corporation Law and our certificate of incorporation to adopt resolutions and file a certificate of designation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. The certificate of designation fixes for each class or series the designations, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions, including, but not limited to, some or all of the following:

 

 the number of shares constituting that series and the distinctive designation of that series, which number may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares then outstanding) from time to time by action of the board of directors;

 the dividend rate and the manner and frequency of payment of dividends on the shares of that series, whether dividends will be cumulative, and, if so, from which date;
 whether that series will have voting rights, in addition to any voting rights provided by law, and, if so, the terms of such voting rights;
   
 whether that series will have conversion privileges, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such conversion, including provision for adjustment of the conversion rate in such events as the board of directors may determine;
   
 whether or not the shares of that series will be redeemable, and, if so, the terms and conditions of such redemption;

 whether that series will have a sinking fund for the redemption or purchase of shares of that series, and, if so, the terms and amount of such sinking fund;
   
 whether or not the shares of the series will have priority over or be on a parity with or be junior to the shares of any other series or class in any respect;
   
 the rights of the shares of that series in the event of voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the corporation, and the relative rights or priority, if any, of payment of shares of that series; and
   
 any other relative rights, preferences and limitations of that series.

 

Once designated by our board of directors, each series of preferred stock may have specific financial and other terms.

 

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock

 

On July 7, 2016, we issued 442,424 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock in a public offering. Our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock ishas a stated value of $33.00 and was initially convertible into 0.00229 shares of our common stock (subject to the beneficial ownership limitations as provided in the related certificate of designation of preferences), at reflecting a conversion price equal to $8.25$14,437.50 per share, of common stock, subject to adjustment as provided in the certificate of designation. In accordance with the anti-dilution price protection contained in the certificate of designation for the Series B Preferred Stock as further described below, we reduced the Series B Preferred Stock conversion price to $2,800.00 per share of common stock in connection with the underwritten public offering that closed on March 14, 2017, which was further reduced to $350.00 per share in connection with the private placement of 750 shares of Series D Preferred Stock in December 2017, to $150.00 per share in connection with the underwritten public offering that closed on March 1, 2018, to $87.50 per share in connection with the underwritten public offering that closed on April 2, 2018, to $15.00 per share in connection with the underwritten public offering that closed on July 3, 2018, to $5.00 per share in connection with the underwritten public offering that closed on April 8, 2019, to $1.80 per share in connection with the underwritten public offering that closed on September 24, 2019, to $0.45 per share in connection with the underwritten public offering that closed on June 5, 2020, and to $0.321 per share in connection with the utilization of the ATM Facility.

The Series B Preferred Stock is convertible at any time at the option of the holder prior to the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance, at which time all shares of outstanding Series B Convertible Preferred Stock shall automatically and without any further action by the holder be converted into shares of our common stock at the then effective conversion price, provided that the holder will be prohibited from converting Series B Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock if, as a result of such conversion, the holder, together with its affiliates, would own more than 9.99% of the total number of shares of our common stock then issued and outstanding.

As of January 26, 2021, there were 17,303 shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding, convertible into an aggregate of 3,112,923 shares of our common stock (including the payment of the cumulative dividends accrued on the Series B Preferred Stock in an aggregate of 1,334,110 shares of our common stock).

The holders of Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cumulative dividends at the rate per share of 15% per annum of the stated value per share, until the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock. The dividends become payable, at our option, in either cash, out of any funds legally available for such purpose, or in shares of common stock, (i) upon any conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock, (ii) on each such other date as our board of directors may determine, subject to written consent of the holders of Series B Preferred Stock holding a majority of the then issued and outstanding Series B Preferred Stock, (iii) upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, and (iv) upon occurrence of a fundamental transaction, including any merger or consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, exchange or conversion of all of our common stock by tender offer, exchange offer or reclassification; provided, however, that if Series B Preferred Stock is converted into shares of common stock at any time prior to the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock, the holder will receive a make-whole payment in an amount equal to all of the dividends that, but for the early conversion, would have otherwise accrued on the applicable shares of Series B Preferred Stock being converted for the period commencing on the conversion date and ending on the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance, less the amount of all prior dividends paid on such converted Series B Preferred Stock before the date of conversion. Make-whole payments are payable at our option in either cash, out of any funds legally available for such purpose, or in shares of common stock.

With respect to any dividend payments and make-whole payments paid in shares of common stock, the number of shares of common stock to be issued to a holder of Series B Preferred Stock will be an amount equal to the quotient of (i) the amount of the dividend payable to such holder divided by (ii) the conversion price then in effect.

We are not obligated to redeem or repurchase any shares of Series B Preferred Stock. Shares of Series B Preferred Stock are not otherwise entitled to any redemption rights, or mandatory sinking fund or analogous fund provision.

The Series B Preferred Stock, to the extent that it has not been converted previously, is subject to full ratchet anti-dilution price protection upon the issuance of equity or equity-linked securities at an effective common stock purchase price of less than the conversion price then in effect, subject to adjustment as provided in the certificate of designation.

In the event of our liquidation, dissolution, or winding up, holders of our Series B Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive the amount of cash, securities or other property to which such holder would be entitled to receive with respect to such shares of Series B Preferred Stock if such shares had been converted to common stock immediately prior to such event (without giving effect for such purposes to the 9.99% beneficial ownership limitation, as applicable) subject to the preferential rights of holders of any class or series of our capital stock specifically ranking by its terms senior to the Series B Preferred Stock as to distributions of assets upon such event, whether voluntarily or involuntarily.

The holders of the Series B Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except as required by law. Any amendment to our certificate of incorporation, bylaws or certificate of designation that adversely affects the powers, preferences and rights of the Series B Preferred Stock requires the approval of the holders of a majority of the shares of Series B Preferred Stock then outstanding.

We have not listed, and we do not plan on making an application to list, the Series B Preferred Stock on the NYSE American, any other national securities exchange or any other nationally recognized trading system. The common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock is listed on the NYSE American under the symbol “NSPR.”

Shares of Series B Preferred Stock were issued in book-entry form under a transfer agency and service agreement between Action Stock Transfer Corp., as transfer agent, and us, and are represented by one or more book-entry certificates deposited with DTC and registered in the name of Cede & Co., a nominee of DTC, or as otherwise directed by DTC.

The transfer agent and registrar for our Series B Preferred Stock is Action Stock Transfer Corp. The transfer agent’s address is 2469 E. Fort Union Blvd., Suite 214, Salt Lake City, Utah 84121.

You should review the certificate of designation of the Series B Preferred Stock and subsequent amendments, which have been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, for a complete description of the terms and conditions of the Series B Preferred Stock.

Potential Common Stock Issuances to the Holders of Our Series B Preferred Stock

Pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions contained in the certification of designation for our Series B Preferred Stock, in the event that, while any of our Series B Preferred Stock is outstanding, we issue equity or equity-linked securities at an effective common stock purchase price of less than the Series B Preferred Stock conversion price then in effect, we are required, subject to certain limitations and adjustments as provided in the certificate of designation, to reduce the Series B Preferred Stock conversion price to equal the effective common stock purchase price. This reduction in the Series B Preferred Stock conversion price will result in a greater number of shares of common stock becoming issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock for no additional consideration. In accordance with this anti-dilution price protection, if the effective purchase price per share of common stock in this offering is below the current Series B Preferred Stock conversion price of $0.321 per share of common stock, it will result in additional shares of common stock becoming issuable to the holders of our Series B Preferred Stock upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock.

Series C Convertible Preferred Stock

On March 14, 2017, we issued 1,069,822 shares of Series C Preferred Stock in a public offering. Our Series C Preferred Stock has a stated value of $6.40, and each share of Series C Preferred Stock was initially convertible into 0.00229 of a share of common stock at an initial conversion price equal to $2,800 per share of common stock. Series C Preferred Stock, to the extent that it has not been converted previously, is subject to full ratchet anti-dilution price protection upon the issuance of equity or equity-linked securities at an effective common stock purchase price of less than the conversion price then in effect, subject to adjustment as provided in the certificate of designation. In accordance with the anti-dilution price protection contained in the certificate of designation for the Series C Preferred Stock as further described below, we reduced the Series C Preferred Stock conversion price to $150.00 per share in connection with the underwritten public offering that closed on March 1, 2018, to $87.50 per share in connection with the underwritten public offering that closed on April 2, 2018, to $15.00 per share in connection with the underwritten public offering that closed on July 3, 2018, to $5.00 per share in connection with the underwritten public offering that closed on April 8, 2019, then to $1.80 per share in connection with the underwritten public offering that closed on September 24, 2019, to $0.45 per share in connection with the underwritten public offering that closed on June 5, 2020, and to $0.321 per share in connection with the utilization of the ATM Facility.

The Series C Preferred Stock is convertible at any time at any time at the option of the holder, provided that the holder will be prohibited from converting Series C Preferred Stock into shares of our common stock if, as a result of such conversion, the holder, together with its affiliates, would own more than 4.99% of the total number of shares of our common stock then issued and outstanding. However, any holder may increase or decrease such percentage to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%, provided that any increase in such percentage shall not be effective until 61 days after such notice to us.

 

The holdersAs of January 26, 2021, there were 2,343 shares of Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock is entitled to receive cumulative dividends at the rate per shareoutstanding, convertible into an aggregate of 15% per annum of the stated value per share, until the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. The dividends become payable, at our option, in either cash, out of any funds legally available for such purpose, or in46,714 shares of common stock, (i) upon any conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, (ii) on each such other date as our board of directors may determine, subject to written consent of the holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock holding a majority of the then issued and outstanding Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, (iii) upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, and (iv) upon occurrence of a fundamental transaction, including any merger or consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, exchange or conversion of all of our common stock by tender offer, exchange offer or reclassification; provided, however, that if Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is converted into shares of common stock at any time prior to the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, the holder will receive a make-whole payment in an amount equal to all of the dividends that, but for the early conversion, would have otherwise accrued on the applicable shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock being converted for the period commencing on the conversion date and ending on the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance, less the amount of all prior dividends paid on such converted Series B Convertible Preferred Stock before the date of conversion. Make-whole payments are payable at our option in either cash, out of any funds legally available for such purpose, or in shares of common stock. Our loan and security agreement with Hercules, dated October 23, 2013, as amended, prohibits us from paying cash dividends or distributions on our capital stock.

With respect to any dividend payments and make-whole payments paid in shares of common stock, the number of shares of common stock to be issued to a holder of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock will be an amount equal to the quotient of (i) the amount of the dividend payable to such holder divided by (ii) the conversion price then in effect.

We are not obligated to redeem or repurchase any shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. Shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock are not otherwise entitled to any redemption rights, or mandatory sinking fund or analogous fund provision.

The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, to the extent that it has not been converted previously, is subject to full ratchet anti-dilution price protection upon the issuance of equity or equity-linked securities at an effective common stock purchase price of less than the conversion price then in effect, subject to adjustment as provided in the certificate of designation.

 

In the event of our liquidation, dissolution, or winding up, holders of our Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive the amount of cash, securities or other property to which such holder would be entitled to receive with respect to such shares of Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock if such shares had been converted to common stock immediately prior to such event (without giving effect for such purposes to the 4.99% or 9.99% beneficial ownership limitation, as applicable) subject to the preferential rights of holders of any class or series of our capital stock specifically ranking by its terms senior to the Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock as to distributions of assets upon such event, whether voluntarily or involuntarily.

 

Shares of Series C Preferred Stock are not entitled to receive any dividends, unless and until specifically declared by our board of directors. However, holders of our Series C Preferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends on shares of Series C Preferred Stock equal (on an as-if-converted-to-common-stock basis, and without giving effect for such purposes to the 4.99% or 9.99% beneficial ownership limitation, as applicable) to and in the same form as dividends actually paid on shares of the common stock when such dividends are specifically declared by our board of directors. We are not obligated to redeem or repurchase any shares of Series C Preferred Stock. Shares of Series C Preferred Stock are not otherwise entitled to any redemption rights, or mandatory sinking fund or analogous fund provision.

The holders of the Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except as required by law. Any amendment to our certificate of incorporation, bylaws or certificate of designation that adversely affects the powers, preferences and rights of the Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock requires the approval of the holders of a majority of the shares of Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock then outstanding.

 

We have not listed, and we do not plan on making an application to list, the Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock on the NYSE MKT,American, any other national securities exchange or any other nationally recognized trading system. The common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock is listed on the NYSE MKTAmerican under the symbol “NSPR.”

 

Shares of Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock were issued in book-entry form under a transfer agency and service agreement between Action Stock Transfer Corp., as transfer agent, and us, and are represented by one or more book-entry certificates deposited with DTC and registered in the name of Cede & Co., a nominee of DTC, or as otherwise directed by DTC.

 

The transfer agent and registrar for our Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock is Action Stock Transfer Corp. The transfer agent’s address is 2469 E. Fort Union Blvd., Suite 214, Salt Lake City, Utah 84121.

 

You should review the certificate of designation of the Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock, and subsequent amendments, which hashave been filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2016,registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, for a complete description of the terms and conditions of the of the Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock.

 

Potential Common Stock Issuances to the Holders of Our Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock

 

Pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions contained in the certification of designation for our Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock, in the event that, while any of our Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock is outstanding, we issue equity or equity-linked securities at an effective common stock purchase price of less than the Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock conversion price then in effect, we are required, subject to certain limitations and adjustments as provided in the certificate of designation, to reduce the Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock conversion price to equal the effective common stock purchase price. This reduction in the Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock conversion price will result in a greater number of shares of common stock beingbecoming issuable upon conversion of the Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock for no additional consideration. In accordance with this anti-dilution price protection, becauseif the effective purchase price per share of common stock purchase price in this offering is below the current Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock conversion price of $8.25$0.321 per share of common stock, it will result in the issuance of additional shares of common stock becoming issuable to the holders of our Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock upon conversion of the Series B ConvertibleC Preferred Stock. Based on

Series A Warrants

On July 7, 2016, we issued to certain investors in an assumedunderwritten public offering Series A Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,107 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $10.00$8,750 per unitshare. The Series A Warrants are exercisable immediately and an assumed Preferred Stock conversion pricemay be exercised until 5:00 p.m. New York City time on July 7, 2021. The Series A Warrants may be exercised only for a whole number of $2.50 per share of common stock and 311,521 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of February 15 , 2017, we would be required to issue 5,015,488 additional shares of common stock tostock.

These Series A Warrants trade on the holdersNYSE American under the symbol “NSPR.WS.” As of January 27, 2021, the Series A Warrants issued and outstanding are exercisable into 1,107 shares of common stock.

The Series A Warrants were issued in book-entry form under a warrant agent agreement between Action Stock Transfer Corp., as warrant agent, and us, and are represented by one or more book-entry certificates deposited with DTC, and registered in the name of Cede & Co., a nominee of DTC, or as otherwise directed by DTC. The warrant agent agreement, and the form of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock.

Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Being Issued in this Offering

The following summary of certain terms and provisions of the Preferred Stock offered in this offeringA Warrant certificate attached thereto, is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the terms and provisions set forth in our certificate of designation of preferences, rights and limitations of the Preferred Stock, which has been filedincluded as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus isforms a part. You should review the warrant agent agreement and the form of Series A Warrant certificate for a complete description of the terms and conditions of the Series A Warrants.

 

PreferredThe warrant agent and registrar for the Series A Warrants is Action Stock Transfer Corp. The warrant agent’s address is convertible into shares2469 E. Fort Union Blvd., Suite 214, Salt Lake City, Utah 84121.

Exercisability. The Series A Warrants are exercisable at any time after the date of our common stock (subjectissuance, and at any time up to the beneficial ownership limitations as provided indate that is 60 months from the related certificatedate of designation of preferences),issuance, at a conversion price equalwhich time any unexercised Series A Warrants will expire and cease to $         per share of common stock, subject to adjustment as provided in the certificate of designation, at any timebe exercisable. The Series A Warrants are exercisable, at the option of each holder, in whole or in part by delivering to us a duly executed exercise notice and by payment in full in immediately available funds for the number of shares of common stock purchased upon such exercise. If a registration statement registering the issuance of the shares of common stock underlying the Series A Warrants under the Securities Act, is not then effective or available, the holder provided thatmay exercise the Series A Warrants through a cashless exercise, in whole or in part, in which case the holder would receive upon such exercise the net number of shares of common stock determined according to the formula set forth in the Series A Warrants. No fractional shares of common stock will be prohibited from converting Preferred Stock intoissued in connection with the exercise of the Series A Warrants. In lieu of fractional shares, of our common stock if, as a result of such conversion,we will either pay the holder togetheran amount in cash equal to the fractional amount multiplied by the exercise price or round up to the next whole share.

Exercise Limitation. A holder will not have the right to exercise any portion of the Series A Warrant if the holder (together with its affiliates,affiliates) would beneficially own more thanin excess of 4.99% of the total number of shares of our common stock then issued and outstanding.outstanding immediately after giving effect to the exercise, as such percentage ownership is determined in accordance with the terms of the Series A Warrants. However, any holder may increase or decrease such percentage to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%, provided that any increase in such percentage shall not be effective until 61 days after such notice to us.

 

Preferred Stock, toExercise Price; Anti-Dilution. The current exercise price per share of common stock purchasable upon exercise of the extent that it has not been converted previously,Series A Warrants is $8,750 per share of common stock. The exercise price is subject to full ratchet anti-dilution price protection upon the issuance of equity or equity-linked securities at an effective common stock purchase price of less than the conversion price then in effect, subject toappropriate adjustment as provided in the certificateevent of designation.

certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting our common stock.

 

Transferability. Subject to applicable laws, the warrants may be offered for sale, sold, transferred or assigned without our consent.

Fundamental Transactions. In the event of a fundamental transaction, as described in the Series A Warrants and generally including any reorganization, recapitalization or reclassification of our liquidation, dissolution,common stock, the sale, transfer or winding up,other disposition of all or substantially all of our properties or assets, our consolidation or merger with or into another person, the holders of our Preferred Stockthe warrants will be entitled to receive upon exercise of the warrants the kind and amount of securities, cash securities or other property to which such holderthat the holders would be entitled to receive with respect to such shares of Preferred Stock if such shareshave received had been converted to common stockthey exercised the warrants immediately prior to such event (without giving effect forfundamental transaction.

Rights as a Stockholder. Except as otherwise provided in the warrants or by virtue of such purposes to the 4.99% or 9.99% beneficialholder’s ownership limitation, as applicable) subject to the preferential rights of holders of any class or seriesshares of our capitalcommon stock, specifically ranking by its terms senior to the Preferred Stock as to distributionsholder of assets upon such event, whether voluntarilya warrant does not have the rights or involuntarily.privileges of a holder of our common stock, including any voting rights, until the holder exercises the warrant.

 

SharesWe, with the consent of Preferred Stock are not entitledthe Series A Warrant holders holding all of the then outstanding Series A Warrants, may increase the exercise price, shorten the expiration date and amend all other warrant terms. We may lower the exercise price or extend the expiration date without the consent of the holders.

Series B Warrants

On March 14, 2017, we issued to receive any dividends, unless and until specifically declared by our boardcertain investors in an underwritten public offering Series B Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of directors. However, holders2,448 shares of our Preferred Stockcommon stock at an exercise price of $3,500 per share. The Series B Warrants are entitled to receive dividendsexercisable immediately and may be exercised until 5:00 p.m. New York City time on March 14, 2022. The Series B Warrants may be exercised only for a whole number of shares of Preferred Stock equal (on an as-if-converted-to-common-stock basis) tocommon stock.

These Series B Warrants trade on the NYSE American under the symbol “NSPR.WSB.” As of January 27, 2021, the Series B Warrants issued and in the same form as dividends actually paid onoutstanding are exercisable into 2,448 shares of the common stock when such dividends are specifically declared by our board of directors. We are not obligated to redeem or repurchase any shares of Preferred Stock. Shares of Preferred Stock are not otherwise entitled to any redemption rights, or mandatory sinking fund or analogous fund provision.stock.

 

The holders of the Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except as required by law. Any amendment to our certificate of incorporation, bylaws or certificate of designation that adversely affects the powers, preferences and rights of the Preferred Stock requires the approval of the holders of a majority of the shares of Preferred Stock then outstanding.

The Preferred Stock will not be listed on the NYSE MKT, any other national securities exchange or any other nationally recognized trading system. We do not plan on making an application to list the Preferred Stock on the NYSE MKT, any other national securities exchange or any other nationally recognized trading system. The common stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Stock is listed on the NYSE MKT under the symbol “NSPR.”

Shares of Preferred Stock will beSeries B Warrants were issued in book-entry form under a transfer agency and servicewarrant agent agreement between Action Stock Transfer Corp., as transferwarrant agent, and us, and shall initially beare represented by one or more global book-entry certificates deposited with DTC, and registered in the name of Cede & Co., a nominee of DTC, or as otherwise directed by DTC. The warrant agent agreement, and the form of Series B Warrant certificate attached thereto, is included as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. You should review the warrant agent agreement and the form of Series B Warrant certificate for a complete description of the terms and conditions of the Series B Warrants.

 

The transferwarrant agent and registrar for our Preferred Stockthe Series B Warrants is Action Stock Transfer Corp. The transferwarrant agent’s address is 2469 E. Fort Union Blvd., Suite 214, Salt Lake City, Utah 84121.

 

You should review a copy of the certificate of designation of the Preferred Stock, which has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, for a complete description of the terms and conditions of the Preferred Stock.

Series B Warrants Being Issued in this Offering

The following is a brief summary of certain terms and conditions of the Series B Warrants and is subject in all respects to the provisions contained in the Series B Warrants being issued in this offering.

FormExercisability. . The Series B Warrants will be issued in book-entry form under a warrant agent agreement between Action Stock Transfer Corp., as warrant agent, and us, and shall initially be represented by one or more book-entry certificates deposited with DTC, and registered in the name of Cede & Co., a nominee of DTC, or as otherwise directed by DTC. You should review a copy of the form of warrant, which is attached as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, for a complete description of the terms and conditions of the Series B Warrants.

Exercisability.The Series B Warrants are exercisable at any time after the date of issuance, and at any time up to the date that is 5 years from the date of issuance, at which time any unexercised Series B Warrants will expire and cease to be exercisable. The Series B Warrants will be exercisable, at the option of each holder, in whole or in part by delivering to us a duly executed exercise notice and by payment in full in immediately available funds for the number of shares of common stock purchased upon such exercise. If a registration statement registering the issuance of the shares of common stock underlying the Series B Warrants under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is not then effective or available, the holder may exercise the warrant through a cashless exercise, in whole or in part, in which case the holder would receive upon such exercise the net number of shares of common stock determined according to the formula set forth in the warrant. No fractional shares of common stock will be issued in connection with the exercise of a warrant. In lieu of fractional shares, we will either pay the holder an amount in cash equal to the fractional amount multiplied by the exercise price or round up to the next whole share.

Exercise Limitation. A holder will not have the right to exercise any portion of the warrant if the holder (together with its affiliates) would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the number of shares of our stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the exercise, as such percentage ownership is determined in accordance with the terms of the Series B Warrants. However, any holder may increase or decrease such percentage to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%, provided that any increase in such percentage shall not be effective until 61 days after such notice to us.

Exercise Price; Anti-Dilution.The assumed initial exercise price per share of common stock purchasable upon exercise of the Series B Warrants is $3.13 per share of common stock, which is equal to 125% of the assumed conversion price of the Preferred Stock. The exercise price is subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting our common stock.

Transferability. Subject to applicable laws, the Series B Warrants may be offered for sale, sold, transferred or assigned without our consent. There is currently no trading market for the Series B Warrants and a trading market may not ever develop.

Exchange Listing. We do not plan to apply to list the Series B Warrants on the NYSE MKT, any other national securities exchange or any other nationally recognized trading system.

 98

Fundamental Transactions. In the event of a fundamental transaction, as described in the Series B Warrants and generally including any reorganization, recapitalization or reclassification of our common stock, the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of our properties or assets, our consolidation or merger with or into another person, the holders of the Series B Warrants will be entitled to receive upon exercise of the Series B Warrants the kind and amount of securities, cash or other property that the holders would have received had they exercised the Series B Warrants immediately prior to such fundamental transaction.

Rights as a Stockholder. Except as otherwise provided in the Series B Warrants or by virtue of such holder’s ownership of shares of our common stock, the holder of a warrant does not have the rights or privileges of a holder of our common stock, including any voting rights, until the holder exercises the warrant.

We, with the consent of the warrant holders holding all of the then outstanding Series B Warrants, may increase the exercise price, shorten the expiration date and amend all other warrant terms. We may lower the exercise price or extend the expiration date without the consent of investors.

You should review a copy of the warrant agent agreement and the form of warrant, each of which has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, for a complete description of the terms and conditions of the Series B Warrants and the warrant agent agreement.

Series C Warrants Being Issued in this Offering

The following is a brief summary of certain terms and conditions of the Series C Warrants and is subject in all respects to the provisions contained in the Series C Warrants being issued in this offering.

Form. The Series C Warrants will be issued in book-entry form under a warrant agent agreement between Action Stock Transfer Corp., as warrant agent, and us, and shall initially be represented by one or more book-entry certificates deposited with DTC, and registered in the name of Cede & Co., a nominee of DTC, or as otherwise directed by DTC. You should review a copy of the form of warrant, which is attached as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, for a complete description of the terms and conditions of the Series C Warrants.

Exercisability. The Series C Warrants are exercisable at any time after the date of issuance, and at any time up to the date that is 6 months from the date of issuance, at which time any unexercised Series C Warrants will expire and cease to be exercisable. The Series C Warrants will be exercisable, at the option of each holder, in whole or in part by delivering to us a duly executed exercise notice and by payment in full in immediately available funds for the number of shares of common stock purchased upon such exercise. If a registration statement registering the issuance of the shares of common stock underlying the Series C Warrants under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is not then effective or available, the holder may exercise the warrant through a cashless exercise, in whole or in part, in which case the holder would receive upon such exercise the net number of shares of common stock determined according to the formula set forth in the warrant. No fractional shares of common stock will be issued in connection with the exercise of a warrant. In lieu of fractional shares, we will either pay the holder an amount in cash equal to the fractional amount multiplied by the exercise price or round up to the next whole share.

 

Exercise Limitation. A holder will not have the right to exercise any portion of the warrant if the holder (together with its affiliates) would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the number of shares of our stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the exercise, as such percentage ownership is determined in accordance with the terms of the Series CB Warrants. However, any holder may increase or decrease such percentage to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%, provided that any increase in such percentage shall not be effective until 61 days after such notice to us.

 

Exercise Price; Anti-DilutionAnti-Dilution. . The assumed initialcurrent exercise price per share of common stock purchasable upon exercise of the Series CB Warrants is $2.50$3,500 per share of common stock, which is equal to the assumed conversion price of the Preferred Stock.stock. The exercise price is subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting our common stock.

 

Transferability. Subject to applicable laws, the Series CB Warrants may be offered for sale, sold, transferred or assigned without our consent. There is currently no trading market for the Series CB Warrants and a trading market may not ever develop.

 99

Exchange Listing. We do not plan to apply to list the Series C Warrants on the NYSE MKT, any other national securities exchange or any other nationally recognized trading system.

Fundamental Transactions. In the event of a fundamental transaction, as described in the Series CB Warrants and generally including any reorganization, recapitalization or reclassification of our common stock, the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of our properties or assets, our consolidation or merger with or into another person, the holders of the Series CB Warrants will be entitled to receive upon exercise of the Series CB Warrants the kind and amount of securities, cash or other property that the holders would have received had they exercised the Series CB Warrants immediately prior to such fundamental transaction. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of a fundamental transaction, each holder may, at its option, at any time concurrently with, or within 30 days after, the consummation of such fundamental transaction, cause us to purchase the unexercised portion of the Series B Warrants at an amount of cash equal to the Black-Scholes value of such Series B Warrants on the date of the consummation of such fundamental transaction; provided, however, such holder may not require us or our successor entity to purchase the Series B Warrants for the Black-Scholes value solely in connection with a fundamental transaction that is (i) not approved by our board of directors and (ii) not within our control.

Rights as a Stockholder. Except as otherwise provided in the Series CB Warrants or by virtue of such holder’s ownership of shares of our common stock, the holder of a warrant does not have the rights or privileges of a holder of our common stock, including any voting rights, until the holder exercises the warrant.

 

We, with the consent of the warrantSeries B Warrant holders holding all of the then outstanding Series CB Warrants, may increase the exercise price, shorten the expiration date and amend all other warrant terms. We may lower the exercise price or extend the expiration date without the consent of investors.

You should review a copy of the warrant agent agreement and the form of warrant, each of which has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, for a complete description of the terms and conditions of the Series C Warrants and the warrant agent agreement.

This prospectus also relates to the offering of the placement agent’s Series B Warrants and of the shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise, if any, of such Series B Warrants. See “Plan of Distribution” section below for more information.

Other Warrants

Series A Warrants

On July 7, 2016, we issued certain investors in an underwritten public offering Series A Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,769,696 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share. The Series A Warrants are exercisable immediately and have a term of exercise of five years from the date of issuance. A holder will not have the right to exercise any portion of the warrant if the holder (together with its affiliates) would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the number of shares of our stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the exercise, as such percentage ownership is determined in accordance with the terms of the Series A Warrants. However, any holder may increase or decrease such percentage to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%, provided that any increase in such percentage shall not be effective until 61 days after such notice to us. The exercise price is subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting our common stock. If a registration statement registering the issuance of the shares of common stock underlying the Series A Warrants under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is not then effective or available, the holder may exercise the warrant through a cashless exercise, in whole or in part, in which case the holder would receive upon such exercise the net number of shares of common stock determined according to the formula set forth in the warrant. Except as otherwise provided in the Series A Warrants or by virtue of such holder’s ownership of shares of our common stock, the holder of a warrant does not have the rights or privileges of a holder of our common stock, including any voting rights, until the holder exercises the warrant. In the event of a fundamental transaction, as described in the Series A Warrants and generally including any reorganization, recapitalization or reclassification of our common stock, the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of our properties or assets, our consolidation or merger with or into another person, the holders of the Series A Warrants will be entitled to receive upon exercise of the Series A Warrants the kind and amount of securities, cash or other property that the holders would have received had they exercised the Series A Warrants immediately prior to such fundamental transaction. These Series A Warrants trade on the NYSE MKT under the symbol “NSPR.WS.” As of  February 15 , 2017, there were 1,769,696 Series A Warrants issued and outstanding.

 100

June 2016 Warrant Agreement

On June 13, 2016, in connection with an amendment entered into on June 13, 2016, to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated October 23, 2013, between us and Hercules, we entered into a warrant agreement with Hercules, pursuant to which we granted warrants to purchase 38,691 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.71. The warrants are immediately exercisable and have a five year term. The warrants may also be exercised on a cashless basis according to the formula set forth in the warrant agreement. The exercise price of the warrants and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are subject to adjustments for stock splits, combinations or similar events. Upon the occurrence of a transaction involving a change of control in which the consideration is either all cash or securities that are either registered for sale on an exchange or quotation system or otherwise unrestricted, the warrants, to the extent not previously exercised, may be exchanged, at the holder’s request, for the consideration the holder would have received as if it had exercised the warrants immediately prior to the change of control. For all other changes of control, the warrants will be assumed by the successor or surviving entity with similar rights to the warrants, and thereafter the warrants shall be exercisable for the same number and type of securities or other property as if the warrants had been exercised in full immediately prior to the change of control. To the extent these warrants are not previously exercised, and if the then-current fair market value of one share of common stock is greater than the exercise price then in effect, or, in the case of a transaction involving a change of control in which the consideration is either all cash or securities that are either registered for sale on an exchange or quotation system or otherwise unrestricted, where the value per share of common stock (as determined as of the closing of such transaction) to be paid to the holders thereof is greater than the exercise price then in effect, the warrants shall be deemed automatically exercised via cashless exercise as of immediately before its expiration.

The warrant agreement provides for “piggyback” registration rights for the shares of common stock underlying the warrants that, if we, at any time and from time to time on or after the issuance and on or before the expiration or earlier termination of the warrants, propose to register under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, any shares of common stock held by one or more stockholders of us for resale by such stockholders, whether on a Form S-3 registration statement or otherwise, we shall give written notice thereof to Hercules and permit Hercules to include any or all of the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants (and any or all shares previously issued to Hercules upon any prior exercise(s)) in such registration on a pari passu basis with such other stockholder(s) and on the same terms and conditions applicable to such other stockholder(s).

March 2016 $14.75 Warrants

On March 21, 2016, we issued certain investors in an underwritten public offering warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 38,005 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $14.75 per share and certain of our directors in a concurrent private placement warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 20,663 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $14.75 per share. The warrants are exercisable immediately and have a term of exercise of five years from the date of issuance. A holder will not have the right to exercise any portion of the warrant if the holder (together with its affiliates) would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the number of shares of our stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the exercise, as such percentage ownership is determined in accordance with the terms of the warrants. However, any holder may increase or decrease such percentage to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%, provided that any increase in such percentage shall not be effective until 61 days after such notice to us. The warrants contain provisions that protect their holders against dilution by adjustment of the purchase price in certain events such as stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications and other similar events. If a registration statement registering the issuance of the shares of common stock underlying the warrants under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is not then effective or available, the holder may exercise the warrant through a cashless exercise, in whole or in part, in which case the holder would receive upon such exercise the net number of shares of common stock determined according to the formula set forth in the warrant. If while the warrants are outstanding, we declare or make any dividend or other distribution of our assets to holders of shares of common stock, then any holder of the warrants shall, upon exercise, have the right to participate in such distribution as if it had exercised the warrants immediately before the date on which a record is taken for such distribution, or, if no such record is taken, the date as of which the record holders of shares of common stock are to be determined for the participation in such distribution, subject to certain limitations. In the event of a fundamental transaction, as described in the warrants and generally including any reorganization, recapitalization or reclassification of our common stock, the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of our properties or assets, our consolidation or merger with or into another person, the holders of the warrants will be entitled to receive upon exercise of the warrants the kind and amount of securities, cash or other property that the holders would have received had they exercised the warrants immediately prior to such fundamental transaction.

 101

March 2016 Underwriter Warrant and Registration Right

In connection with the underwritten public offering in March 2016, on March 21, 2016, we issued Dawson James Securities, Inc. a five-year warrant to purchase up to 3,800 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $18.44 per share. The underwriter warrant is exercisable at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, during the period commencing six months following the date of issuance and ending five years from March 16, 2016. The underwriter warrant may be exercised through a cashless exercise, in whole or in part, in which case Dawson James Securities, Inc. would receive upon such exercise the net number of shares of common stock determined according to the formula set forth in the warrant. Dawson James Securities, Inc. has the right to include the shares of common stock underlying the underwriter warrant as part of any other registration of securities we file, subject to certain marketing and other limitations. This “piggyback” registration right terminates on March 16, 2021. The warrant contains provisions that protect its holder against dilution by adjustment of the purchase price in certain events such as stock dividends, stock splits and other similar events. In case of any reclassification or reorganization of the outstanding shares of common stock other than the foregoing, or in the case of any share reconstruction or amalgamation or consolidation of us with or into another corporation, or in the case of any sale or conveyance to another corporation or entity of our property as an entirety or substantially as an entirety in connection with which we are dissolved, Dawson James Securities, Inc. will have the right to receive upon exercise of the underwriter warrant, the kind and amount of shares of stock or other securities or property receivable upon such reclassification, reorganization, share reconstruction or amalgamation, or consolidation, or upon a dissolution following any such sale or transfer, by a holder of the number of shares of our common stock obtainable upon exercise of the underwriter’s warrant immediately prior to such event.

March 2016 Placement Agent Warrant and Registration Right

In connection with the private placement in March 2016, on March 21, 2016, we issued Dawson James Securities, Inc. a five-year warrant to purchase up to 2,067 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $18.44 per share. This warrant is exercisable at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, during the period commencing six months following the date of issuance and ending five years from the date of issuance. The terms of this warrant are identical to the March 2016 underwriter warrant described above.

March 2015 $137.50 Warrants

On March 9, 2015, we issued certain investors in a public offering warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 137,481 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $137.50 per share. The warrants are exercisable immediately and have a term of exercise of five years from the date of issuance. A holder will not have the right to exercise any portion of the warrant if the holder (together with its affiliates) would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the number of shares of our stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the exercise, as such percentage ownership is determined in accordance with the terms of the warrants. However, any holder may increase or decrease such percentage to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%, provided that any increase in such percentage shall not be effective until 61 days after such notice to us. The exercise price is subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting our common stock. If a registration statement registering the issuance of the shares of common stock underlying the warrants under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is not then effective or available, the holder may exercise the warrant through a cashless exercise, in whole or in part, in which case the holder would receive upon such exercise the net number of shares of common stock determined according to the formula set forth in the warrant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, on the termination date of this warrant, the warrant will be automatically exercised via cashless exercise. If while the warrants are outstanding, we declare or make any dividend or other distribution of our assets to holders of shares of common stock, then any holder of the warrants shall have the right to participate in such distribution as if it had completely exercised the warrants immediately before the date on which a record is taken for such distribution, or, if no such record is taken, the date as of which the record holders of shares of common stock are to be determined for the participation in such distribution. In the event of a fundamental transaction, as described in the warrants and generally including any reorganization, recapitalization or reclassification of our common stock, the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of our properties or assets, our consolidation or merger with or into another person, the holders of the warrants will be entitled to receive upon exercise of the warrants the kind and amount of securities, cash or other property that the holders would have received had they exercised the warrants immediately prior to such fundamental transaction.

 102

November 2014 $325 Warrants

On November 7, 2014, we issued certain investors in a public offering warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 12,531 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $325 per share. The warrants are exercisable at any time after six months after the date of issuance, and at any time up to the date that is 42 months from the date of issuance. A holder will not have the right to exercise any portion of the warrant if the holder (together with its affiliates) would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% of the number of shares of our stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the exercise, as such percentage ownership is determined in accordance with the terms of the warrants. However, any holder may increase or decrease such percentage to any other percentage not in excess of 9.99%, provided that any increase in such percentage shall not be effective until 61 days after such notice to us. The exercise price is subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting our common stock. If a registration statement registering the issuance of the shares of common stock underlying the warrants under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is not then effective or available, the holder may exercise the warrant through a cashless exercise, in whole or in part, in which case the holder would receive upon such exercise the net number of shares of common stock determined according to the formula set forth in the warrant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, on the termination date of this warrant, the warrant will be automatically exercised via cashless exercise. If while the warrants are outstanding, we declare or make any dividend or other distribution of our assets to holders of shares of common stock, then any holder of the warrants shall have the right to participate in such distribution as if it had completely exercised the warrants immediately before the date on which a record is taken for such distribution, or, if no such record is taken, the date as of which the record holders of shares of common stock are to be determined for the participation in such distribution. In the event of a fundamental transaction, as described in the warrants and generally including any reorganization, recapitalization or reclassification of our common stock, the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of our properties or assets, our consolidation or merger with or into another person, the holders of the warrants will be entitled to receive upon exercise of the warrants the kind and amount of securities, cash or other property that the holders would have received had they exercised the warrants immediately prior to such fundamental transaction.

October 2013 $742.50 Warrant and Registration Rights

On October 23, 2013, in connection with that certain Loan and Security Agreement, dated October 23, 2013, between us and Hercules, we issued Hercules a warrant to purchase 674 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $742.50 per share. The warrant is immediately exercisable and has a five year term. The warrant may also be exercised on a cashless basis according to the formula set forth in the warrant. The exercise price of the warrant and the number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrant are subject to adjustments for stock splits, combinations or similar events. Upon the occurrence of a transaction involving a change of control in which the consideration is either all cash or securities that are either registered for sale on an exchange or quotation system or otherwise unrestricted, the warrant, to the extent not previously exercised, may be exchanged, at the holder’s request, for the consideration the holder would have received as if it had exercised the warrant immediately prior to the change of control. For all other changes of control, the warrant will be assumed by the successor or surviving entity with similar rights to the warrant, and thereafter the warrant shall be exercisable for the same number and type of securities or other property as if the warrant had been exercised in full immediately prior to the change of control. To the extent this warrant is not previously exercised, and if the then-current fair market value of one share of common stock is greater than the exercise price then in effect, or, in the case of a transaction involving a change of control in which the consideration is either all cash or securities that are either registered for sale on an exchange or quotation system or otherwise unrestricted, where the value per share of common stock (as determined as of the closing of such transaction) to be paid to the holders thereof is greater than the exercise price then in effect, the warrant shall be deemed automatically exercised via cashless exercise as of immediately before its expiration.

The warrant contains “piggyback” registration rights for the shares of common stock underlying the warrant that, if we, at any time and from time to time on or after the issuance and on or before the expiration or earlier termination of the warrant, propose to register under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, any shares of common stock held by one or more stockholders of us for resale by such stockholders, whether on a Form S-3 registration statement or otherwise, we shall give written notice thereof to Hercules and permit Hercules to include any or all of the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrant (and any or all shares previously issued to Hercules upon any prior exercise(s)) in such registration on a pari passu basis with such other stockholder(s) and on the same terms and conditions applicable to such other stockholder(s).

April 2013 $750.00 Warrants

On April 16, 2013, we issued certain holders of our then outstanding convertible debentures warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 2,640 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $750.00 per share. We are prohibited from effecting the exercise of any such warrant to the extent that as a result of such exercise the holder of the exercised warrant beneficially owns more than 4.99% in the aggregate of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock calculated immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of our common stock upon the exercise of the warrant (subject to an increase, upon at least 61 days’ notice by the holder of such warrant to us, of up to 9.99%). The warrants contain provisions that protect their holders against dilution by adjustment of the purchase price in certain events such as stock dividends, stock splits and other similar events. If there is no effective registration statement registering, or no current prospectus available for, the resale of the shares of common stock underlying the warrants at the time of exercise of the warrants, the holders of such warrants have the right to exercise the warrants by means of a cashless exercise. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the last sale price of the common stock on the principal trading market on the trading day immediately preceding the termination date of the warrant is greater than the exercise price, at our election, this warrant shall either be (i) automatically exercised via cashless exercise as of the termination date or (ii) exercised via a cash exercise in accordance with the terms of the warrant. In addition, upon the occurrence of a transaction involving a change of control that is (i) an all cash transaction, (ii) a “Rule 13e-3 transaction” as defined in Rule 13e-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or (iii) involving a person or entity not traded on a national securities exchange, the holders of the warrants will have the right, among others, to have the warrants repurchased in exchange for issuance of a number of shares of common stock equal to a fraction of (i) the numerator of which is the Black Scholes value (as calculated pursuant to the warrants) of the remaining unexercised portion of the warrant, and (ii) the denominator of which is the sum of the price per share being offered in cash, if any, plus the value of any non-cash consideration, if any, being offered in such fundamental transaction. If while the warrants are outstanding, we issue any evidences of indebtedness, assets, rights or warrants to subscribe for or purchase any security of the company, then any holder of the warrants shall, upon exercise, have the right to acquire the same securities as if it had exercised the warrants immediately before the date on which a record is taken for such distribution, or, if no such record is taken, the date as of which the record holders of shares of common stock are to be determined for the participation in such distribution. The warrants expire on April 16, 2018.

April 2012 $1,800.00 Warrants

On April 5, 2012, we issued certain investors warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,344 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1,800.00 per share. We are prohibited from effecting the exercise of any such warrant to the extent that as a result of such exercise the holder of the exercised warrant beneficially owns more than 4.99% in the aggregate of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock calculated immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of our common stock upon the exercise of the warrant (subject to an increase, upon at least 61 days’ notice by the holder of such warrant to us, of up to 9.99%). The warrants contain provisions that protect their holders against dilution by adjustment of the purchase price in certain events such as stock dividends, stock splits and other similar events. If at any time after 60 days following the date of issuance of the warrants there is no effective registration statement registering, or no current prospectus available for, the resale of the shares of common stock underlying the warrants, the holders of such warrants have the right to exercise the warrants by means of a cashless exercise. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the last sale price of the common stock on the principal trading market on the trading day immediately preceding the termination date of the warrant is greater than the exercise price, at our election, this warrant shall either be (i) automatically exercised via cashless exercise as of the termination date or (ii) exercised via a cash exercise in accordance with the terms of the warrant.

In addition, upon the occurrence of a transaction involving a change of control that is (i) an all cash transaction, (ii) a “Rule 13e-3 transaction” as defined in Rule 13e-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or (iii) involving a person or entity not traded on a national securities exchange, the holders of the warrants will have the right, among others, to have the warrants repurchased in exchange for issuance of a number of shares of common stock equal to a fraction of (i) the numerator of which is the Black Scholes value (as calculated pursuant to the warrants) of the remaining unexercised portion of the warrant, and (ii) the denominator of which is the sum of the price per share being offered in cash, if any, plus the value of any non-cash consideration, if any, being offered in such fundamental transaction. If while the warrants are outstanding, we issue any evidences of indebtedness, assets, rights or warrants to subscribe for or purchase any security of the company, then any holder of the warrants shall, upon exercise, have the right to acquire the same securities as if it had exercised the warrants immediately before the date on which a record is taken for such distribution, or, if no such record is taken, the date as of which the record holders of shares of common stock are to be determined for the participation in such distribution. The warrants expire on April 5, 2017.

April 2012 Placement Agent Warrants

As consideration for serving as our placement agents in connection with certain private placements, on April 5, 2012, we issued Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC a five-year warrant to purchase up to 160 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1,800.00 per share, Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. a five-year warrant to purchase up to 114 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1,800.00 per share and JMP Securities LLC a five-year warrant to purchase up to 40 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1,800.00 per share. The terms of these warrants are identical to the April 2012 $1,800.00 Warrants described above.

 

Delaware Anti-Takeover Law, Provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws

 

Delaware Anti-Takeover Law

 

We are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Section 203 generally prohibits a public Delaware corporation from engaging in a “business combination” with an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless:

 

 prior to the date of the transaction, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;
   
 the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the number of shares outstanding (i) shares owned by persons who are directors and also officers and (ii) shares owned by employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or
   
 on or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the business combination is approved by the board and authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding voting stock which is not owned by the interested stockholder.

 

Section 203 defines a business combination to include:

 

 any merger or consolidation involving the corporation and the interested stockholder;
   
 any sale, transfer, pledge or other disposition involving the interested stockholder of 10% or more of the assets of the corporation;
   
 subject to exceptions, any transaction that results in the issuance or transfer by the corporation of any stock of the corporation to the interested stockholder; or
   
 the receipt by the interested stockholder of the benefit of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits provided by or through the corporation.

In general, Section 203 defines an interested stockholder as any entity or person beneficially owning 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation and any entity or person affiliated with, or controlling, or controlled by, the entity or person. The term “owner” is broadly defined to include any person that, individually, with or through that person’s affiliates or associates, among other things, beneficially owns the stock, or has the right to acquire the stock, whether or not the right is immediately exercisable, under any agreement or understanding or upon the exercise of warrants or options or otherwise or has the right to vote the stock under any agreement or understanding, or has an agreement or understanding with the beneficial owner of the stock for the purpose of acquiring, holding, voting or disposing of the stock.

 

The restrictions in Section 203 do not apply to corporations that have elected, in the manner provided in Section 203, not to be subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law or, with certain exceptions, which do not have a class of voting stock that is listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders. Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws do not opt out of Section 203.

 

Section 203 could delay or prohibit mergers or other takeover or change in control attempts with respect to us and, accordingly, may discourage attempts to acquire us even though such a transaction may offer our stockholders the opportunity to sell their stock at a price above the prevailing market price.

 

Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws

 

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may delay or discourage transactions involving an actual or potential change in our control or change in our management, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares, or transactions that our stockholders might otherwise deem to be in their best interests. Therefore, these provisions could adversely affect the price of our common stock. Among other things, our certificate of incorporation and bylaws:

 

 permit our board of directors to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, without further action by the stockholders, with any rights, preferences and privileges as they may designate, including the right to approve an acquisition or other change in control;
   
 provide that the authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the board of directors;
   
 provide that all vacancies, including newly created directorships, may, except as otherwise required by law, be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of directors then in office, even if less than a quorum;
   
 divide our board of directors into three classes, with each class serving staggered three-year terms;
   
 do not provide for cumulative voting rights (therefore allowing the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote in any election of directors to elect all of the directors standing for election, if they should so choose);
   
 provide that special meetings of our stockholders may be called only by our board of directors; and
   
 set forth an advance notice procedure with regard to the nomination, other than by or at the direction of our board of directors, of candidates for election as directors and with regard to business to be brought before a meeting of stockholders.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTIONUNDERWRITING

 

We have entered into an underwriting agreement, dated    , 2021, with A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners with respect to the shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants. Subject to certain conditions, we have agreed to sell to the underwriter, and the underwriter has agreed to purchase, the shares of common stock and pre-funded warrants provided below.

Underwriters

Number of

Units

Number of Pre-Funded

Units

Total
A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners
Total

The underwriter is committed to purchase all the units and pre-funded units offered by us other than those covered by the option to purchase additional units, consisting of common stock and/or Series G Warrants, described below. The obligations of the underwriter may be terminated upon the occurrence of certain events specified in the underwriting agreement. Furthermore, pursuant to the underwriting agreement, the underwriter’s obligations are subject to customary conditions, representations and warranties contained in the underwriting agreement, such as receipt by the underwriter of officers’ certificates and legal opinions.

107

Placement Agency AgreementDiscount, Commissions and Expenses

 

In connection withWe have agreed to sell the securities to the underwriter at the offering price of $0.7623 per unit or $0.7623 per pre-funded unit, as applicable, which represents the offering price of such securities set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, less the applicable 7.0% underwriting discount.

The underwriter has advised us that they propose to offer the units and pre-funded units at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and to certain dealers at that price less a concession not in excess of $   per unit and pre-funded unit. The underwriter may allow, and certain dealers may reallow, a discount from the concession not in excess of $    per unit and pre-funded unit to certain brokers and dealers. After this offering, we will enter into a placement agency agreement with Dawson James Securities, Inc., pursuantthe public offering price, concession and reallowance to which Dawson James Securities, Inc. will agreedealers may be changed by the representative. No such change shall change the amount of proceeds to actbe received by us as our exclusive placement agentset forth on a best efforts basis in connection with the salecover page of our securities.this prospectus. The placement agent has no obligation to purchase or sell any securitiesunits and pre-funded units are offered by the underwriter as stated herein, subject to receipt and acceptance by them and subject to their right to reject any order in whole or in part. The underwriter has informed us under this prospectus for its own account orthat it does not intend to arrange the purchase or saleconfirm sales to any accounts over which it exercises discretionary authority in excess of any specific number or dollar amount5% of the securities, but the placement agent will agree to act as our agent and to use its reasonable best efforts to arrange for the saleshares of all of the securities in this offering. The placement agent may retain other brokers or dealers to act as sub-agents on its behalf in connection with this offering and may pay any sub-agent a solicitation fee with respect to any securities placed by it. Affiliates and associated persons of Dawson James Securities, Inc. may invest in this offering on the same terms and conditions as the public investors participating in this offering. Dawson James Securities, Inc. may engage one or more other brokers or dealers to act as sub-agents on its behalfcommon stock being offered in connection with this offering.

 

The placement agency agreement will provide thatfollowing table shows the obligations ofunderwriting discount payable to the placement agent are subject to certain conditions precedent, including, among other things, the absence of any material adverse changeunderwriter by us in our business and the receipt of customary legal opinions, letters and certificates. In addition, we will make certain representations and warranties in the placement agency agreement and we will agree to certain covenants in the placement agent agreement.connection with this offering.

 

Upon closing, we will deliver to each purchaser delivering funds the number of shares of   Preferred and Warrants included in the units purchased by such purchaser in electronic format.

Total
Per
Unit
Per Pre-
Funded
Unit
Without
Over-
Allotment
With
Over-
Allotment
Public offering price
Underwriting discounts and commissions (7%)
Proceeds, before expenses, to us

 

Fees and Expenses

We will pay the placement agent a fee equal to 8.0% of the gross proceeds of the offering and a solicitation fee equal to 5.0% of the proceeds from the exercise of the Series C Warrants . We have also agreed to reimburse the placement agentunderwriter for its diligence andaccountable legal expenses not to exceed $62,500$65,000 and its reasonable “blue sky” fees andnon-accountable expenses not to exceed 0.5% of $25,000.the aggregate gross proceeds of this offering. We estimate that expenses payable by us in connection with this offering, including reimbursement of these underwriter expenses, but excluding the underwriting discount referred to above, will be approximately $170,000.

Over-allotment Option

 

We estimatehave granted to the total expensesunderwriter an option exercisable not later than 45 days after the date of this prospectus to purchase up to an additional 2,951,594 units consisting of 2,951,594 shares of common stock and/or Series G Warrants to purchase 1,475,797 shares of common stock at the public offering price per share of common stock set forth on the cover page hereto less the underwriting discounts and commissions. The underwriter may exercise the option solely to cover overallotments, if any, made in connection with this offering. If any additional shares of common stock and/or Series G Warrants are purchased pursuant to the over-allotment option, the underwriter will offer these shares of common stock and/or Series G Warrants on the same terms as those on which the other securities are being offered.

Underwriter Warrants

Upon closing of this offering, excluding the placement agent fees,we will be approximately $207,500. Because there is no minimum offering amount required as a condition to closing in this offering, the actual offering amount, placement agent fees and proceeds to us, if any, in this offering may be substantially less than the maximum offering amounts set forth in this prospectus.

We have also agreed to issue to the placement agentA.G.P. a compensation warrant entitling A.G.P. or its designees to purchase a number ofup to                 shares of our common stock equal(equal to an aggregate of 5%5% of the aggregate number of shares of common stock underlying the securities sold in this offering (including the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Preferred Stock, but excluding any shares of common stock underlying the Warrants issued in this offering). The placement agent warrant will have an exercise price equal to 125% of the conversion price of the Preferred Stock and may be exercised on a cashless basis. The placement agent warrant is not redeemable by us. This prospectus also covers the sale of the placement agent warrant and the shares of common stock and common stock issuable upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants that we issue in this offering), subject to any reductions necessary to comply with the rules and regulations of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., or FINRA. The underwriter warrants will be exercisable immediately and for five years from the effective date of the registration statement. The warrant will provide for registration rights for the shares underlying the warrant. The placement agent warrant, and the underlying shares of common stock have been deemed compensation by FINRA, and are therefore subjectpursuant to FINRA Rule 5110(g)(1). In accordance with5110(f)(2)(G), including a one-time demand registration right and piggyback rights for period of not more than five years and seven years, respectively, as well as contain customary anti-dilution provisions. Pursuant to FINRA Rule 5110(g)(1), neither the placement agent warrant norunderwriter warrants and any shares issued upon exercise of common stock underlying such warrant maythe underwriter warrants shall not be sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, or hypothecated, or be the subject of any hedging, short sale, derivative, put or call transaction that would result in the effective economic disposition of suchthe securities by any person for a period of 180 days immediately following the date of effectiveness or commencement of sales of thethis offering, pursuant to which the placement agent warrant is being issued, except the transfer of any security: (i) by operation of law or by reason of our reorganization; (ii) to any FINRA member firm participating in the offering and the officers or partners thereof, if all securities so transferred remain subject to the lock-up restriction set forth above for the remainder of the time period; (iii) if the aggregate amount of our securities held by the underwriter or related persons do not exceed 1% of the securities being offered; (iv) that is beneficially owned on a pro rata basis by all equity owners of an investment fund, provided that no participating member manages or otherwise directs investments by the fund and the participating members in the aggregate do not own more than 10% of the equity in the fund; or (v) the exercise or conversion of any security, if all securities remain subject to the lock-up restriction set forth above for the remainder of the time period.

 

 108by operation of law or by reason of reorganization of our company;
   
to any FINRA member firm participating in this offering and the officers or partners thereof, if all securities so transferred remain subject to the lock-up restriction described above for the remainder of the time period;
if the aggregate amount of our securities held by either a placement agent or a related person do not exceed 1% of the securities being offered;
that is beneficially owned on a pro-rata basis by all equity owners of an investment fund, provided that no participating member manages or otherwise directs investments by the fund, and participating members in the aggregate do not own more than 10% of the equity in the fund; or
the exercise or conversion of any security, if all securities received remain subject to the lock-up restriction set forth above for the remainder of the time period.

Although the placement agent warrant and the underlying shares of common stock have been registered on the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, we have agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to file a short-form registration statement on Form S-3 covering the resale of such underlying securities, on one occasion only upon request by the placement agent, within 30 days after we become eligible to use such Form S-3. These registration rights shall expire on the fifth anniversary of the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

 

Restriction on Sales of Capital Stock

The placement agency agreement will contain a restriction on sales of our capital stock by us, pursuant to which we will agree to not, for a period of 90 days after the date of the placement agency agreement, subject to certain exceptions, (i) offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, lend, or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, our capital stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for our capital stock; (ii) file or cause to be filed any registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the offering of our capital stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for our capital stock other than the filing of a Registration Statement on Form S-8; (iii) enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of our capital stock, whether any such transaction described in clause (i), (ii) or (iii) above is to be settled by delivery of our capital stock or such other securities, in cash or otherwise; or (iv) publicly announce an intention to effect any transaction specified in clause (i), (ii) or (iii) above.

Determination of Exercise Price of the Warrants

We currently estimate that the initial exercise price for Series B Warrants will be equal to 125% of the conversion price of the Preferred Stock and that the initial warrant exercise price for Series C Warrants will be equal to the conversion price of the Preferred Stock . The exercise price of the Warrants will be negotiated between us and Dawson James Securities, Inc. Among the factors to be considered in these negotiations are prevailing market conditions, our current value of our market capitalization compared to the size of the offering, our capitalization, market prices of our common stock in recent periods, our financial and operating information in recent periods, market valuations of us and other companies that we and Dawson James Securities, Inc. believe to be comparable to us, our prospects, the present state of our development and other factors deemed relevant.

Other MattersIndemnification

 

We have agreed to indemnify the placement agent and certain other personsunderwriter against certain liabilities, including civil liabilities under the Securities Act and liabilities arising from breaches of 1933, as amended,representations and warranties contained in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to advance costs of defense incurred in respect of those liabilities, andunderwriting agreement, or to contribute to payments that the placement agentunderwriter may be required to make in respect of those liabilities.

 

Lock-up Agreements

Our directors and executive officers have entered into lock-up agreements. Under these agreements, these individuals have agreed, subject to specified exceptions, not to sell or transfer any shares of common stock or securities convertible into, or exchangeable or exercisable for, our shares of common stock during a period ending 90 days after the date of this prospectus, without first obtaining the written consent of A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners. Specifically, these individuals have agreed, in part, not to:

offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, grant, lend or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of common stock, whether now owned or hereafter acquired or with respect to which such person has or later acquires the power of disposition, whether any such transaction is to be settled by delivery of our securities, in cash, or otherwise;
enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of our securities, whether any such transaction is to be settled by delivery of our shares of common stock, in cash or otherwise;
make any demand for or exercise any right with respect to the registration of any of our securities; or
publicly disclose the intention to make any offer, sale, pledge or disposition, or to enter into any transaction, swap, hedge or other arrangement relating to any of our securities.

Notwithstanding these limitations, these shares of common stock may be transferred under limited circumstances, including, without limitation: by gift, will or intestate succession; to a charity or educational institution, which would be required to assume the lock-up restriction; to our company, pursuant to agreements under which we have an option to repurchase those shares or due to the termination of the individual’s services to our company; by operation of law or by order of a court of competent jurisdiction; and pursuant to a bona fide third party tender offer, merger, consolidation or other similar transaction made to all holders our shares involving a change of control of our company. The placement agent has informed uslock-up also does not apply to shares acquired in open market transactions after the completion of the offering, provided that itno filing under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is required or is voluntarily made.

In addition to the restrictions on our directors and executive officers, we have also agreed to certain restrictions on our company’s sale of shares of our common stock (and related activities) during the 90 day period from the date of this prospectus.

Investor Agreement

Any purchaser that purchases in this offering in excess of $250,000 of units or pre-funded units, as a condition to such purchase, will notbe required to execute an investor agreement pursuant to which they will (i) agree to vote the shares of our common stock that they own or control on the record date of our next stockholder meeting (which we anticipate will be on or about the date of the closing of this offering, with the stockholder meeting occurring within 60 days after the record date) in favor of approval to amend our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, as amended, to effect the Planned Reverse Split; and (ii) agree to certain limitations on sales of our common stock that they own or control during the period from the effective date of this registration statement until sixty days thereafter.

Stabilization

In connection with this offering, the underwriter may engage in over-allotment transactions, syndicate-covering transactions, stabilizing transactions, penalty bids and purchases to cover positions created by short sales.

Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase shares, so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum and are engaged in for the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the shares while the offering is in progress.
Over-allotment transactions involve sales by the underwriter of shares of common stock in excess of the number of shares the underwriter is obligated to purchase. This creates a syndicate short position, which may be either a covered short position or a naked short position. In a covered short position, the number of shares of common stock over-allotted by the underwriter is not greater than the number of shares of common stock that they may purchase in the over-allotment option. In a naked short position, the number of securities involved is greater than the number of shares in the over-allotment option. The underwriter may close out any short position by exercising their over-allotment option and/or purchasing common stock in the open market.
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of common stock in the open market after the distribution has been completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In determining the source of common stock to close out the short position, the underwriter will consider, among other things, the price of common stock available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase common stock through exercise of the over-allotment option. If the underwriter sells more shares of common stock than could be covered by exercise of the over-allotment option, and, therefore, have a naked short position, the position can be closed out only by buying common stock in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriter is concerned that after pricing there could be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open market that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering.
Penalty bids permit the underwriter to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when the common stock originally sold by that syndicate member are purchased in stabilizing or syndicate covering transactions to cover syndicate short positions.

These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of our common stock. As a result, the price of our common stock in the open market may be higher than it would otherwise be in the absence of these transactions.

Neither we nor the underwriter make any representation or prediction as to the effect that the transactions described above may have on the prices of our securities. These transactions may occur on the NYSE American or on any other trading market. If any of these transactions are commenced, they may be discontinued without notice at any time.

Passive Market Making

In connection with this offering.offering, the underwriter and any selling group members may engage in passive market making transactions in our common stock on the NYSE American in accordance with Rule 103 of Regulation M under the Exchange Act during a period before the commencement of offers or sales of Common Stock and extending through the completion of the distribution. A passive market maker must display its bid at a price not in excess of the highest independent bid of that security. However, if all independent bids are lowered below the passive market maker’s bid that bid must then be lowered when specified purchase limits are exceeded.

Electronic Distribution

This prospectus in electronic format may be made available on websites or through other online services maintained by one or more of the placement agent,underwriter, or by itstheir affiliates. Other than this prospectus in electronic format, the information on the placement agent’sany underwriter’s website and any information contained in any other website maintained by the placement agentan underwriter is not part of this prospectus or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved and/or endorsed by us or the placement agentany underwriter in its capacity as underwriter, and should not be relied upon by investors.

 

110

Other

From time to time, Dawson James Securities, Inc.the underwriter and/or its affiliates have provided, and may in the future provide, various investment banking and other financial services for us for which services they have received and, may in the future receive, customary fees. ExceptIn the course of their businesses, the underwriter and its affiliates may actively trade our securities or loans for services providedtheir own account or for the accounts of customers, and, accordingly, the underwriter and its affiliates may at any time hold long or short positions in connection with thissuch securities or loans. The underwriter, for instance, participated as the lead underwriter in the Company’s underwritten public offering Dawson Jamesthat closed on June 5, 2020 and as sales agent to the Company’s “at-the-market” offering pursuant to a sales agreement dated July 28, 2020.

Notice to Investors

Israel

This document does not constitute a prospectus under the Israeli Securities Inc.Law, 5728-1968, or the Securities Law, and has not providedbeen filed with or approved by the Israel Securities Authority. In the State of Israel, this document is being distributed only to, and is directed only at, and any offer of the securities offered hereby is directed only at, investors listed in the first addendum, or the Addendum, to the Israeli Securities Law, consisting primarily of joint investment bankingin trust funds, provident funds, insurance companies, banks, portfolio managers, investment advisors, members of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, underwriters, venture capital funds, entities with equity in excess of NIS 50 million and “qualified individuals”, each as defined in the Addendum (as it may be amended from time to time), collectively referred to as qualified investors (in each case purchasing for their own account or, otherwhere permitted under the Addendum, for the accounts of their clients who are investors listed in the Addendum). Qualified investors will be required to submit written confirmation that they fall within the scope of the Addendum, are aware of the meaning of same and agree to it.

European Economic Area-Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and Netherlands

The information in this document has been prepared on the basis that all offers of securities will be made pursuant to an exemption under the Directive 2003/71/EC (“Prospectus Directive”), as implemented in Member States of the European Economic Area (each, a “Relevant Member State”), from the requirement to produce a prospectus for offers of securities.

An offer to the public of the securities has not been made, and may not be made, in a Relevant Member State except pursuant to one of the following exemptions under the Prospectus Directive as implemented in that Relevant Member State:

(a) to legal entities that are authorized or regulated to operate in the financial services preceding the datemarkets or, if not so authorized or regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;

(b) to any legal entity that has two or more of this prospectus and we do not expect to retain any placement agent to perform any investment banking or other financial services for(i) an average of at least 90 days after250 employees during its last fiscal year; (ii) a total balance sheet of more than €43,000,000 (as shown on its last annual unconsolidated or consolidated financial statements) and (iii) an annual net turnover of more than €50,000,000 (as shown on its last annual unconsolidated or consolidated financial statements);

(c) to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than qualified investors within the datemeaning of this prospectus, exceptArticle 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive) subject to obtaining the prior consent of the company or any underwriter for any such offer; or

(d) in any other circumstances falling within Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive, provided that no such offer of securities shall result in a requirement for the following:publication by the company of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.

 

 111in March 2015, Dawson James Securities, Inc. served as a co-placement agent selected by H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC, the lead placement agent, in connection with a public offering of 137,481 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase 137,481 shares of our common stock. In connection with such offering, Dawson James Securities, Inc., together with H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC, received placement agent fee equal to 8% of the aggregate gross proceeds of the offering;
   
in March 2016, Dawson James Securities, Inc. served as an underwriter in connection with a public offering of 76,004 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase up to 38,005 shares of our common stock. In connection with such offering, Dawson James Securities, Inc. received underwriting discounts of $89,680 and was issued underwriter’s warrants to purchase 3,800 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $18.44 per share. In addition, we reimbursed Dawson James Securities, Inc. for $25,000 in expenses, and for its “blue sky” fees and expenses of $20,000;
in March 2016, Dawson James Securities, Inc. served as a placement agent in connection with a private offering of approximately $600,000 of our common stock and warrants on the same terms as the March 2016 public offering described above. In connection with such private placement, we agreed to pay a placement agent fee of 8% of the offering proceeds, to reimburse the placement agent for its expenses up to $25,000 and to issue the placement agent warrants to purchase up to 5% of the number of shares of common stock sold in the private placement at an exercise price per share equal to $18.44; and
in July 2016, Dawson James Securities, Inc. served as a placement agent in connection with a public offering of approximately 442,424 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and accompanying warrants to purchase up to approximately 44,242,424 shares of common stock. The gross proceeds to the Company from this offering were approximately $14.6 million. In connection with such offering, Dawson James Securities, Inc. received placement agent fees equal to 9% of the aggregate gross proceeds of the offering and we issued the placement agent a unit purchase option to purchase 3.5% of the number of securities sold in the offering.

Canada

The securities offered in this prospectus may be sold only to purchasers purchasing, or deemed to be purchasing, as principal that are accredited investors, as defined in National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions or subsection 73.3(1) of the Securities Act (Ontario), and are permitted clients, as defined in National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations. Any resale of the securities must be made in accordance with an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the prospectus requirements of applicable securities laws.

Securities legislation in certain provinces or territories of Canada may provide a purchaser with remedies for rescission or damages if this prospectus (including any amendment thereto) contains a misrepresentation, provided that the remedies for rescission or damages are exercised by the purchaser within the time limit prescribed by the securities legislation of the purchaser’s province or territory. The purchaser should refer to any applicable provisions of the securities legislation of the purchaser’s province or territory for particulars of these rights or consult with a legal advisor.

Pursuant to section 3A.3 (or, in the case of securities issued or guaranteed by the government of a non-Canadian jurisdiction, section 3A.4) of National Instrument 33-105 Underwriting Conflicts (NI 33-105), the underwriter is not required to comply with the disclosure requirements of NI 33-105 regarding underwriter conflicts of interest in connection with this offering.

LEGAL MATTERS

 

The validity of the securities offered by this prospectus will be passed upon for us by Haynes and Boone,McDermott Will & Emery LLP, New York, New York. Schiff HardinOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP, Washington, DC,New York, New York, is acting as counsel for the placement agentunderwriter in connection with the securities offered hereby.

 

EXPERTS

 

The financial statements as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 20162019 included in this prospectusProspectus have been so included in reliance on the report (which contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as described in Note 11b to the financial statements )statements) of Kesselman & Kesselman, an independent registered public accounting firm andCertified Public Accountants (Isr.), a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

 

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and in accordance therewith we file annual, quarterly, and currentother reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such reports, proxy statements and other information, can be readincluding the Registration Statement, and copied atexhibits and schedules thereto, are available to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, on official business days during the hours of 10:00 am to 3:00 pm. Please call the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-732-0330 for further information on the operation of the Public Reference Room. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The address ofpublic through the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website iswww.sec.gov.at http://www.sec.gov.

 

We make available free of charge on or through our website atwww.inspire-md.com, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Transition Reports on Form 10-KT, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with or otherwise furnish it to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, relating to the offering of these securities. The registration statement, including the attached exhibits, contains additional relevant information about us and the securities. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement. You can obtain a copy of the registration statement at prescribed rates, from the Securities and Exchange Commission at the address listed above, or for free at www.sec.gov. The registration statement and the documents referred to below under “Incorporation of Certain Information By Reference” areis also available on our website,www.inspire-md.com.

 

We have not incorporated by reference into this prospectus the information on our website, and you should not consider it to be a part of this prospectus.

INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCEINSPIREMD, INC.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The Securities and Exchange Commission allows us to “incorporate by reference” the information we have filed with it, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The information we incorporate by reference is an important part of this prospectus, and later information that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission will automatically update and supersede this information. We incorporate by reference all future documents (excluding information furnished pursuant to Items 2.02 and 7.01 of Form 8-K) we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, subsequent to the date of this prospectus and prior to the termination of the offering, which shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference into the prospectus .

You should rely only on the information incorporated by reference or provided in this prospectus. We have not authorized anyone else to provide you with different information. You should not assume that the information in this prospectus is accurate as of any date other than the date of this prospectus or the date of the documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus.

We will provide without charge to each person to whom a copy of this prospectus is delivered, upon written or oral request, a copy of any or all of the reports or documents that have been incorporated by reference in this prospectus but not delivered with this prospectus (other than an exhibit to these filings, unless we have specifically incorporated that exhibit by reference in this prospectus). Any such request should be addressed to us at: 4 Menorat Hamaor St., Tel Aviv, Israel 6744832 , Attention: Craig Shore, Chief Financial Officer, or made by phone at (888) 776-6804 . You may also access the documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus through our website atwww.inspire-md.com. Except for the specific incorporated documents listed above, no information available on or through our website shall be deemed to be incorporated in this prospectus or the registration statement of which it forms a part.

InspireMD, Inc.

750,000 Units

Each Consisting of 1 Share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock

One Warrant to Purchase 4 Shares of Common Stock

and

One Short-Term Warrant to Purchase 4 Shares of Common Stock

3,000,000 Shares of Common Stock Underlying the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock

3,000,000 Shares of Common Stock Underlying the Warrants

3,000,000 Shares of Common Stock Underlying the Short-Term Warrants

, 2017

INSPIREMD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 Page
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMF-2
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Consolidated Balance SheetsF-3 - F-4
Consolidated Statements of OperationsF-5F-4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (Capital Deficiency)F-5 - F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-7
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsF-8 - F-34
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Consolidated Balance SheetsF-35 - F-36
Consolidated Statements of OperationsF-37
Consolidated Statements of Changes in EquityF-38 - F-39
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsF-40
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsF-41 - F-46

The amounts are stated in U.S. dollars in thousands

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the board of directors and shareholders of InspireMD Inc.

InspireMD Inc.Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

In our opinion,We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of InspireMD Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity (capital deficiency) and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of InspireMD Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 20162019, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of

Substantial Doubt About the Company’s management. Our responsibility isAbility to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, onContinue as a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.Going Concern

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1b to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has an accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2016, as well as a history of netsuffered recurring losses and negative operating cash flows in recent years. The Company's management expects to continue incurring losses and negative cash flows from operations until its products reach commercial profitability. As a result of these expected losses and negative cash flowsoutflows from operations, along with the Company’s current cash position, the Company's management has determined the Company only has sufficient resources to fund operations for a period of up to six months from the date of issuing the consolidated financial statements. Therefore, there isoperating activities that raise substantial doubt about the Company’sits ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regardsregard to these matters are also described in Note 1b. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 2(g) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Tel Aviv, Israel /s/ Kesselman & Kesselman

February 16, 2017

Tel-Aviv, Israel
Kesselman & Kesselman
March 9, 2020

Certified Public Accountants (Isr.(lsr.)

A member of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited

LLP

 

Kesselman & Kesselman, Trade Tower, 25 Hamered Street, Tel-Aviv 6812508, Israel,

P.O Box 50005 Tel-Aviv 6150001 Telephone: +972 -3- 7954555, Fax:+972 -3- 7954556, www.pwc.com/ilWe have served as the Company’s auditor since 2010.

INSPIREMD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(U.S. dollars in thousands)

 

 December 31,  December 31, 
 2016 2015  2019 2018 
ASSETS             
CURRENT ASSETS:                
Cash and cash equivalents $7,516  $3,257  $5,514  $9,384 
Accounts receivable:                
Trade, net  356   405   823   716 
Other  157   142   150   104 
Prepaid expenses  65   75   87   81 
Inventory  500   753   1,236   1,134 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS  8,594   4,632   7,810   11,419 
                
NON-CURRENT ASSETS:                
Property, plant and equipment, net  379   472   547   421 
Operating lease right of use assets  937   - 
Fund in respect of employee rights upon retirement  399   502   586   448 
Royalties buyout  38   87 
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS  816   1,061   2,070   869 
TOTAL ASSETS $9,410  $5,693  $9,880  $12,288 

 

F-3

INSPIREMD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(U.S. dollars in thousands other than share and per share data)

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (NET OF CAPITAL DEFICIENCY)        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES:        
Current maturity of long-term loan $2,680  $4,149 
Accounts payable and accruals:        
Trade  618   512 
Other  1,447   2,006 
Advanced payment from customers  33   167 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES  4,778   6,834 
         
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:        
Liability for employees rights upon retirement  587   706 
Long-term loan  -   1,099 
TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES  587   1,805 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Note 9)        
TOTAL LIABILITIES  5,365   8,639 
         
EQUITY (CAPITAL DEFICIENCY):        
         
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; 150,000,000 and 50,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively; 1,475,318 and 314,065 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively  -   - 
Preferred shares, par value $0.0001 per share;  5,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively; 311,521 and 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively  -   - 
Additional paid-in capital  135,959   120,050 
Accumulated deficit  (131,914)  (122,996)
Total equity (capital deficiency)  4,045   (2,946)
Total liabilities and equity (net of capital deficiency) $9,410  $5,693 
  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES:        
Accounts payable and accruals:        
Trade  646   929 
Other  2,449   1,966 
Contract liability  20   25 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES  3,115   2,920 
         
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:        
Operating lease liabilities  653   - 
Liability for employee rights upon retirement  729   605 
         
TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES  1,382   605 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Note 7)        
TOTAL LIABILITIES  4,497   3,525 
         
EQUITY:        
         
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; 150,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2019 and 2018; 3,916,134 and 768,615 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively  -   - 
Preferred B shares, par value $0.0001 per share;
500,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2019 and 2018; 17,303 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively
  -   - 
Preferred C shares, par value $0.0001 per share;
1,172,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2019 and 2018; 34,370 and 61,423 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively
  -   - 
Additional paid-in capital  163,015   156,355 
Accumulated deficit  (157,632)  (147,592)
Total equity  5,383   8,763 
Total liabilities and equity $9,880  $12,288 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

F-4F-3
 

 

INSPIREMD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

 Year Ended December 31,  Year Ended December 31, 
 2016  2015  2019 2018 
          
REVENUES $1,894  $2,310  $3,721  $3,601 
COST OF REVENUES  1,792   2,606   2,965   2,606 
GROSS PROFIT (LOSS)  102   (296)
GROSS PROFIT  756   995 
OPERATING EXPENSES:                
Research and development  1,291   3,642   2,954   1,535 
Selling and marketing  1,459   3,178   2,396   2,241 
General and administrative  5,000   6,387   5,222   4,830 
Restructuring and impairment  -   982 
Total operating expenses  7,750   14,189   10,572   8,606 
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (7,648)  (14,485)  (9,816)  (7,611)
FINANCIAL EXPENSES, net:                
Interest expenses  721   1,036         
Other financial expenses  91   60 
Total financial expenses  812   1,096 
Other financial expenses (income)  200   (371)
Total financial expenses (income)  200   (371)
LOSS BEFORE TAX EXPENSES  (8,460)  (15,581)  (10,016)  (7,240)
TAX EXPENSES  1   4   24   - 
NET LOSS $(8,461) $(15,585) $(10,040) $(7,240)
NET LOSS PER SHARE -basic and diluted  (5.93)  (55.85)  (4.80)  (16.67)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF ORDINARY SHARES USED IN COMPUTING NET LOSS PER SHARE -basic and diluted  1,425,617   279,055   2,089,964   461,539 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-5

INSPIREMD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (CAPITAL DEFICIENCY)

(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)

  Common stock  Preferred stock  Additional paid-in  Accumulated  Total equity (capital 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  capital  deficit  deficiency) 
BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2015  170,710   *       -  $104,624  $(107,411) $(2,787)
Net loss                      (15,585)  (15,585)
Issuance of shares and warrants, net of $1,315 issuance costs  137,479   *           12,432       12,432 
Share-based compensation related to restricted stock award, net of forfeitures of 406 shares  7,460               1,286       1,286 
Share-based compensation related to stock options award                  1,821       1,821 
Taxes withheld in respect of share issuance  (1,584)  *

           (113)      (113)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2015  314,065   *

       -  $120,050  $(122,996) $(2,946)
Net loss                      (8,461) $(8,461)
Cumulative effect adjustment related to adoption of share-based compensation standard (ASU 2016-09)                  457   (457)  - 
Issuance of common stock, preferred shares and warrants, net of $1,966 issuance costs  117,327       442,424   *   14,365       14,365 
Conversion of preferred shares to common shares  916,321   *   (130,903)  *             
Warrants granted to lender in a debt modification                  123       123 
Share-based compensation related to restricted stock award, net of forfeitures of 1,266 shares  128,559               84       84 
Share-based compensation related to stock options award                  894       894 
Exercise of options by employee and non-employee  300   *                   - 
Issuance of shares for options cancelled  8   *                   - 
Taxes withheld in respect of share issuance  (1,262)  *           (14)      (14)
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2016  1,475,318   *

   311,521   *

  $135,959  $(131,914) $4,045 

*Represents an amount less than $1

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

F-6F-4
 

 

INSPIREMD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)

  Common stock  Series B Convertible Preferred Stock  Series C Convertible Preferred Stock  Series D Preferred Stock  Additional paid-in  Accumulated  Total 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  capital  deficit  equity 
                                  
BALANCE AT JANUARY 1, 2018  30,106   *   27,075   *   741,651   *   750   *  $143,079  $(140,352) $2,727 
Net loss                                     $(7,240) $(7,240)
Issuance of common shares, warrants, Pre-funded warrants and exercise of pre-funded warrants, net of $2,206 issuance costs  711,777   *                           15,827       15,827 
Redemption of Series D Preferred Stock                          (750)  *   (750)      (750)
Conversion of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock to common shares  1,613   *   (9,772)  *         ��         274       274 
Classification of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock                  (353,792)  *           (3,200)      (3,200)
Conversion of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock to common shares  22,896   *           (326,436)  *           936       936 
Exercise of Unit Purchase Option  2,229   *                           557       557 
Accretion of redeemable preferred shares                                  (438)      (438)
Share-based compensation related to restricted stock and stock options award, net of forfeitures of 6 shares  (6)  *                           70       70 
BALANCE AT December 31, 2018  768,615   -   17,303   *   61,423   *   -   *  $156,355  $(147,592) $8,763 

* Represents an amount less than $1 thousand

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

INSPIREMD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)

  Common stock  

Series B

Convertible

Preferred Stock

  

Series C

Convertible

Preferred Stock

  Additional paid-in  Accumulated  Total
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  capital  deficit  equity
                           
BALANCE AT December 31, 2018  768,615   *   17,303   *   61,423   *  $156,355  $(147,592)  $8,763
Net loss                              (10,040)  (10,040)
Issuance of common shares, warrants, pre-funded warrants and exercise of pre-funded warrants, net of $1,177 issuance costs  3,039,161   *                   6,335       6,335
Conversion of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock to common shares  38,614   *           (27,053)  *      *   -
Share-based compensation related to restricted stock , restricted stock units and stock options award, net of forfeitures of 838 shares  69,744     *                        325       325
BALANCE AT December 31, 2019  3,916,134   *   17,303   *   34,370   *  $163,015  $(157,632) $5,383

* Represents an amount less than $1

INSPIREMD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(U.S. dollars in thousands)

 

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
 2016  2015  2019  2018 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                
Net loss $(8,461) $(15,585) $(10,040) $(7,240)
Adjustments required to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:                
Depreciation and amortization  191   241   158   152 
Impairment of royalties buyout  -   576 
Loss from sale of property, plant and equipment  -   14 
Change in liability for employees rights upon retirement  (119)  19   124   (19)
Financial expenses  222   249 
Non cash financial expense (income)  8   (392)
Net change in operating lease assets and liabilities  78     
Share-based compensation expenses  978   3,107   325   70 
Loss (gains) on amounts funded in respect of employee rights upon retirement, net  (16)  3   (35)  5 
Changes in operating asset and liability items:                
Decrease in prepaid expenses  10   141 
Decrease in trade receivables  49   230 
Increase in prepaid expenses  (6)  (19)
Increase in trade receivables  (107)  (73)
Decrease (increase) in other receivables  (15)  217   (46)  90 
Decrease in inventory  253   1,171 
Increase in inventory  (102)  (601)
(Decrease) increase in trade payables  106   (397)  (283)  584 
Decrease in other payable and advanced payment from customers  (693)  (1,582)
(Decrease) increase in other payables and contract liability  116   (163)
Net cash used in operating activities  (7,495)  (11,596)  (9,810)  (7,606)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                
Purchase of property, plant and equipment  (49)  (16)  (284)  (67)
Amounts funded in respect of employee rights upon retirement, net  119   (7)
Amounts funded (withdrawn) in respect of employee rights upon retirement, net  (103)  23 
Net cash used in investing activities  70   (23)  (387)  (44)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                
Proceeds from issuance of shares and warrants, net of $1,966 and $1,315 issuance costs, respectively  14,365   12,432 
Repayment of loan  (2,648)  (3,702)
Taxes withheld in respect of share issuance  (14)  (113)
Proceeds from issuance of shares and warrants and exercise of Pre-Funded Warrants and unit purchase option, net of $1,177 and $2,206 issuance costs, respectively  6,335   16,384 
Redemption of series C and D preferred stock      (3,014)
Net cash provided by financing activities  11,703   8,617   6,335   13,370 
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (19)  (41)  (8)  (46)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  4,259   (3,043)  (3,870)  5,674 
BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR  3,257   6,300   9,384   3,710 
BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR $7,516  $3,257  $5,514  $9,384 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:                
Income taxes $6  $13  $-  $- 
Interest paid $399  $863  $-  $- 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                
Warrants granted to lender in a debt modification, see Note 7c $123   - 
Classification of Redemption Obligation of Preferred Shares to Mezzanine and Embedded Derivative, see Note 8a $-   164 
Acquisition of right-of-use assets by means of lease liabilities  67   - 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

 

F-7
 

 

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

 

 a.General
   
  InspireMD, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), together with its subsidiaries, is a medical device company focusing on the development and commercialization of its proprietary MicroNet™ stent platform technology for the treatment of complex vascular and coronary disease. MicroNet, a micron mesh sleeve, is wrapped over a stent to provide embolic protection in stenting procedures. In October 2014, the Company launched a limited market release of its
The Company’s carotid embolic prevention systemproduct (CGuard™ EPS), which combines MicroNet and a self-expandable nitinol stent in a single device to treat carotid artery disease. In January 2015, a new version of CGuard, with a rapid exchange delivery system, received CE mark approval in Europe and in September 2015, the Company announced the full market launch of CGuard EPS in Europe.
   
  The Company’s coronary productsproduct combining MicroNet and a bare-metal stent (MGuard Prime™ EPS) areis marketed for use in patients with acute coronary syndromes, notably acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) and saphenous vein graft coronary interventions (bypass surgery).
The Company markets its products through distributors in international markets, mainly in Europe and Latin America.Europe.
   
 b.Liquidity
   
  

The Company has an accumulated deficit as of December 31, 2016,2019, as well as a history of net losses and negative operating cash flows in recent years. The Company expects to continue incurring losses and negative cash flows from operations until its products (primarily CGuard™ EPS) reach commercial profitability. As a result of these expected losses and negative cash flows from operations, along with the Company’s current cash position, the Company only has sufficient resources to fund operations for a perioduntil the end of up to six months from the date of issuing these consolidated financial statements.May 2020. Therefore, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

   
  Management’s plans include the continued commercialization of the Company’s products and raising capital through the sale of additional equity securities, debt or capital inflows from strategic partnerships. There are no assurances however, that the Company will be successful in obtaining the level of financing needed for its operations. If the Company is unsuccessful in commercializing its products and raising capital, it may need to reduce activities, curtail or cease operations.

 

F-8

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

 a.Use of estimates
   
  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates using assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
   
  As applicable to these consolidated financial statements, the most significant estimates and assumptions relate to inventory valuations, share based compensationclassification and fair value of financial instruments, assessing the likelihood of exercise of options to extend the lease term and legal contingencies.

F-8
   

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 b.Functional currency
   
  The currency of the primary economic environment in which the operations of the Company and its subsidiaries are conducted is the U.S. dollar (“$” or “dollar”). Accordingly, the functional currency of the Company and its subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar.
   
  The dollar figures are determined as follows: transactions and balances originally denominated in dollars are presented in their original amounts. Balances in foreign currencies are translated into dollars using historical and current exchange rates for non-monetary and monetary balances, respectively. The resulting translation gains or losses are recorded as financial income or expense, as appropriate. For transactions reflected in the statements of operations in foreign currencies, the exchange rates at transaction dates are used. Depreciation and changes in inventories and other changes deriving from non-monetary items are based on historical exchange rates.
   
 c.Principles of consolidation
   
  The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and of its subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.
   
 d.Cash and cash equivalents
   
  The Company considers all highly liquid investments, which include short-term bank deposits (up to three months from date of deposit), that are not restricted as to withdrawal or use, to be cash equivalents.

F-9
 

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

 e.Concentration of credit risk and allowance for doubtful accounts
   
  Financial instruments that may potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents, which are deposited in major financially sound institutions in the U.S, Israel and Germany, and trade accounts receivable. The Company’s trade accounts receivable areis derived from revenues earned from customers from various countries. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition and, requires no collateral from its customers. The Company also has a credit insurance policy for some of its customers. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable based upon the expected ability to collect the accounts receivable. The Company reviews its allowance for doubtful accounts quarterly by assessing individual accounts receivable and all other balances based on historical collection experience and an economic risk assessment. If the Company determines that a specific customer is unable to meet its financial obligations to the Company, the Company provides an allowance for credit losses to reduce the receivable to the amount management reasonably believes will be collected, which is netted against “Accounts receivable-receivable - Trade”.

F-9
   

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 f.Inventory
   
  Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (cost is determined on a “first-in, first-out” basis) or marketnet realizable value. The Company’s inventories generally have a limited shelf life and are subject to impairment as they approach their expiration dates. The Company regularly evaluates the carrying value of its inventoriesinventory and when, based on such evaluation, factors indicate that impairment has occurred, the Company impairs the inventories’ carrying value.
   
 g.Leases
In February 2016, the FASB established ASC Topic 842, Leases (Topic 842), by issuing ASU No. 2016-02, which requires lessees to recognize leases on-balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the statement of operations. We adopted the new standard on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective transition method and we did not restate comparative periods. The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. We have elected the ‘package of practical expedients’, which permit it not to reassess under the new standard its prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs for leases entered into prior to adoption of Topic 842.
Additionally, the Company did not separate lease and non-lease components for all of our leases. The Company elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means, for those leases that qualify, the Company will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities, and this includes not recognizing ROU assets or lease liabilities for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. Instead, we will continue to recognize the lease payments for those leases in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The new standard had a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. The most significant effects of adoption relate to (1) the recognition of new operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities on its balance sheet for real estate operating leases; and (2) providing significant new disclosures about its leasing activities.
Upon adoption, we recognized additional operating lease liabilities, of approximately $1.2 million based on the present value of the remaining lease payments under current leasing standards for existing operating leases. The Company also recognized corresponding ROU assets of approximately $1.2 million. Lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when the Company is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Our leases may include variable payments based on measures that include changes in price index which are expensed as incurred and presented as operating expense on the condensed consolidated statements of operations in the same line item as expense arising from fixed lease payments.
The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting. See Note 7.
h.Property, plant and equipment
   
  Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets: over three years for computers and other electronic equipment, and seven to fifteen years for office furniture and equipment and machinery and equipment (mainly seven years). Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, which is shorter than the estimated life of the improvements.
   
 h.i.Impairment in value of long-lived assets
   
  The Company tests long-lived intangible and tangible assets for impairment whenever events or circumstances present an indication of impairment. If the sum of expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) of the long-lived assets is less than the carrying amount of such assets, an impairment would be recognized, and the assets would be written down to their estimated fair values, based on expected future discounted cash flows.

F-10
 

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

 i.j.Revenue recognition
   
  A contract with a customer exists only when: 1) the parties to the contract have approved it and are committed to perform their respective obligations, 2) the Company can identify each party’s rights regarding the distinct goods or services to be transferred (“Performance Obligations”), 3) the Company can determine the transaction price for the goods or services to be transferred, 4) the contract has commercial substance and 5) it is probable that the Company will collect the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for the goods or services that will be transferred to the customer. Revenues are recorded in the amount of consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for Performance Obligations upon transfer of control to the customer, excluding sales taxes.
Revenue from sales of goods, including sales to distributors, is recognized when deliverythe customer obtains control of the product, once the Company has occurred, evidence of an arrangement exists,a present right to payment and legal title, and risksrisk and rewards forof ownership are obtained by the customer. This occurs when products are transferred toshipped.
The Company recognizes the customerincremental costs of obtaining contracts as an expense since the amortization period of the assets that the Company otherwise would have recognized is one year or less. The costs are recorded under selling and collectionmarketing expenses. Disaggregated revenue is reasonably assured.disclosed in Note 11.
   
  The Company recognizes revenue net of value added tax (VAT).

 j.k.Research and development costs
   
  Research and development costs are charged to the statement of operations as incurred.

F-10
   

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 k.l.Share-based compensation
   
  The Company has equity incentive plans under which the Company grants equity awards, including stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). Employee optionequity awards are classified as equity awards and accounted for using the grant-date fair value method. The Company determines compensation expense associated with Restricted Stock and RSUs based on the fair value of share-basedour common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of option awards is estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model and expensed over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. Until December 31, 2015, theperiod. The Company estimated forfeitures based on historical experience and anticipated future conditions. Beginning on January 1, 2016, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09 and and elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. See Note 2s4.
   
  The Company elected to recognize compensation expenses for awards with only service conditions that have graded vesting schedules using the accelerated multiple option approach.
   
 In addition, certain share-based awards of the Company are market and performance based and dependent upon achieving certain goals. With respect to performance based awards, the Company estimates the expected pre-vesting award probability that the performance conditions will be achieved. The Company only recognizes expense for those shares that are expected to vest.
l.m.Uncertain tax positions
   
  The Company follows a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit. If under the first step a tax provision is assessed to be more likely than not of being sustained on audit, the second step is performed, under which the tax benefit is measured as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Such liabilities are classified as long-term, unless the liability is expected to be resolved within twelve months from the balance sheet date. The Company’s policy is to include interest related to unrecognized tax benefits within “Financial expenses -net”- net”.

 m.n.Deferred income taxes
   
  Deferred taxes are determined utilizing the “asset and liability” method based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial accounting and tax bases of assets and liabilities under the applicable tax laws, and on tax rates anticipated to be in effect when the deferred taxes are expected to be paid or realized. The Company assesses realization of deferred income tax assets and, based on all available evidence, concludes whether it is more likely than not that the net deferred income tax assets will be realized. A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred income tax assets not considered to be realizable.
   
  The Company may incur an additional tax liability in the event of intercompany dividend distributions by its subsidiaries. Such additional tax liability in respect of these foreign subsidiaries has not been provided for in these financial statements as it is the Company’s policy to permanently reinvest the subsidiaries’ earnings and to consider distributing dividends only in connection with a specific tax opportunity that may arise.
   
  Taxes that would apply in the event of disposal of investments in a foreign subsidiary have not been taken into account in computing the deferred taxes, as it is the Company’s intention to hold, and not to realize, these investments.

 

F-11
 

 

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

 

 n.o.Advertising
   
  Costs related to advertising and promotion of products are charged to sales and marketing expense as incurred. Advertising expenses were approximately $0.1 million$262,000 and $0.2 million$157,000 for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
   
 o.p.Net loss per share
   
  

Basic and diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period attributable to common stock (after adding the extinguishment and accretion of Series D and Series C Convertible Preferred shares in 2018) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. For the year ended December 31, 2016 the basicperiod, including 151,884 and diluted net loss per also included 602,61421,632 weighted average shares of common stock issuable to holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (since the conversion isthey are convertible based only on the passage of time – see Note 10a).

time) and 72,493 and 15,885 weighted average shares of common stock issuable to holders of unexercised Pre-Funded Warrants for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The calculation of diluted net loss per share excludes potential share issuances of common stock upon the exercise of share options, warrants, restricted stocks, restricted stock units, preferred stock and placement agent unit as thetheir effect is anti-dilutive.

The total number of shares of common stock related to outstanding options, warrants, restricted stocks and placement agent unit excluded from the calculations of diluted loss per share were 2,668,117 and 200,194 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

   
 p.q.Segment reporting
   
  The Company has one operating and reportable segment.
   
 q.r.Fair value measurement
   
  The Company measures fair value and discloses fair value measurements for financial assets and liabilities. Fair value is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
   
  The accounting standard establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described below:
   
  Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.
   
  Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.
   
  Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.
   
  In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible and considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.

F-12

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 

NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):

 s.Recently adopted and issuedIssued accounting pronouncements

1)In April, 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASU No. 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs.” The new guidance requires debt issuance costs to be presented effective in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt liability, consistent with the presentation of a debt discount. The new guidance does not affect the recognition and measurement of debt issuance costs. The new guidance became effective during the first quarter of 2016 and was applied on a retrospective basis.future periods
   
  As of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, $35,000 and $85,000, respectively were deducted from the carrying value of the “Current maturity of loan” in the consolidated balance sheets.Financial Instruments - Credit Losses
   
 2)

In May 2014,June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, Revenue from contracts with customers. The objectiveASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326)-Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This guidance replaces the current incurred loss impairment methodology. Under the new guidance, on initial recognition and at each reporting period, an entity is required to recognize an allowance that reflects its current estimate of credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the new revenue standard is to provide a single, comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers to improve comparability within industries, across industries, and across capital markets. The revenue standard contains principles that an entity will apply to determine the measurement of revenue and timing of when it is recognized. The underlying principle is that an entity will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at an amount that the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services,financial instrument based on a five step model that includes the identification of the contract with the customerhistorical experience, current conditions and the performance obligations in the contract, determination of the transaction price, allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contractreasonable and recognizing revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The revenue standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017. The Company expected that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

3)On July 22, 2015,supportable forecasts. In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory,” which requires that inventory within the scope of the guidance be measured at the lower of cost2019-10, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and net realizable value. Inventory measured using last-in, first-outHedging (Topic 815), and the retail inventory method are not impacted by the new guidance.Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates (“ASU 2019-10”). The new guidance will be effective for public business entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those years. Prospective application is required. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The adoptionpurpose of this standardamendment is not expected to create a two tier rollout of major updates, staggering the effective dates between larger public companies and all other entities. This granted certain classes of companies, including Smaller Reporting Companies (“SRCs”), additional time to implement major FASB standards, including ASU 2016-13. Larger public companies will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

4)In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09 – Improvements to Employee Share Based Payment Accounting which simplifies certain aspects of the accounting for share-based payments, including accounting for income taxes, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, classification on the statement of cash flows as well as allowing an entity-wide accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest or account for forfeitures as they occur. This ASU is effective date for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016,2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. EarlyAll other entities are permitted to defer adoption of ASU 2016-13, and its related amendments, until the earlier of fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2022. Under the current SEC definitions, the Company meets the definition of an SRC as of the ASU 2019-10 issuance date and is permitted in any annual or interimadopting the deferral period for which financial statements have not yet been issued, and all amendments in the ASU that apply must be adopted in the same period.2016-13. The Company adopted the update during the quarter ended December 31, 2016, and has retroactively applied the guidance effective as of January 1, 2016. The Company elected to account for forfeitures as they occur rather than estimate expected forfeitures which resulted inrequires a modified retrospective transition approach through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the current period of $457,000. Certain amounts or ratios for 2016 interim periods have been restated to reflect the adoption of this new guidance. Adoption of this update does not affect the Company’s total equity or book value per share.
5)In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Restricted Cash”. The new guidance requires that the reconciliation of the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown in the statement of cash flows include restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. If restricted cash is presented separately from cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet, companies will be required to reconcile the amounts presented on the statement of cash flows to the amounts on the balance sheet. Companies will also need to disclose information about the nature of the restrictions. The guidance is effective for annual an interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
6)In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15 “Statement of Cash Flows Topic 230: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.” ASU No. 2016-15 issued guidance to clarify how certain cash receipts and cash payments should be presented in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
7)In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. The new standard is effective for annual periods and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and upon adoption, an entity should apply the amendments by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. Early adoption is not permitted except for the provision to record fair value changes for financial liabilities under the fair value option resulting from instrument-specific credit risk in other comprehensive income.adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoptingthe adoption of ASU 2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements, but does not believe the adoption of this guidance.standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

F-14

NOTE 3 - FAIR VALUE MEASURMENT

The following tables summarize the activity for those financial liabilities where fair value measurements are estimated utilizing Level 3 inputs:

  Derivative Liability
($ in thousands)
Balance as of January 1, 2018$-
Classification of Redemption Obligation of
preferred shares holder to Mezzanine
620
Conversion of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock
to common shares
(182)
Revaluation of embedded derivative- financial
income
(438)
Balance as of December 31, 2018$-

Level 3 liabilities include Derivative Liability related to the Company Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, as described in Note 8. The Company values the Level 3 Derivative Liability using multi-period Binomial model, whose inputs include probability of completing fund raising and the related fund raise amounts, volatility of stock prices, stock prices, term to extinguish the Series C Convertible Preferred shares held by the Series D investor (see defined in Note 8).

In calculating the fair value of Derivative Liability related to the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company used the following assumptions: stock price of $4.20 for the transaction date, and Volatility of 140.95% -166.60% for the transaction date.

F-13
 

 

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

8)In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases, which requires to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The accounting standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company expected that the adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3 - RESTRUCTURING AND IMPAIRMENT

  

Year ended

December 31, 2015

 
  ($ in thousands) 
Employee termination costs(1)  305 
Lease settlement(2)  101 
Total restructuring $406 
Impairment of royalties buyout(3)  576 
Total restructuring and impairment $982 

During the first quarter of 2015, the board of directors approved to curtail developing and promoting our bare metal stent platform and implementing another cost reduction/focused spending plan. The plan has four components: (i) reducing headcount; (ii) limiting the focus of clinical and development expenses to only carotid and neurovascular products; (iii) limiting sales and marketing expenses primarily to those related to the CGuard EPS stent launch; and (iv) reducing all other expenses (including conferences, travel, promotional expenses, executive cash salaries, director cash fees, rent, etc.).

(1)During the year ended December 31, 2015, the company incurred $305,000 of costs associated with reducing the Company’s headcount.
(2)On November 5, 2015, the Company entered into a second amendment (the “Second Lease Amendment”) to the lease agreement for its facilities in the U.S. Pursuant to the Second Lease Amendment and effective January 1, 2016, the Company agreed to reduce its leased space and surrender the released premises. The Company also agreed to pay transaction costs and settlement amount of $101,000.
(3)During the year ended December 31, 2015 the Company recorded expenses related to the impairment of the royalties buyout asset amounting to $576,000 due to anticipated lower sales of MGuard Prime in the future resulting from industry preferences for drug eluting stents.
The Company values Level 3 Royalties buyout using an internally developed valuation model, whose inputs include future MGuard Prime EPS sales and the derived royalties payments.

F-15

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TOTHE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 

NOTE 4 - FAIR VALUE MEASURMENT

Fair value of financial instruments

The carrying amounts of financial instruments included in working capital approximate their fair value either because these amounts are presented at fair value or due to the relatively short-term maturities of such instruments. The fair value of the Loan (as defined in Note 7) approximated its carrying amount since it bears interest at rates that approximate current market rates.

NOTE 5 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

 

 a.Composition of assets, grouped by major classifications, is as follows:

 

 December 31,  December 31, 
 2016  2015  2019  2018 
 ($ in thousands)  ($ in thousands) 
Cost:             
Computer equipment $227  $221  $287  $241 
Office furniture and equipment  107   104   95   73 
Machinery and equipment  1,001   961   1,414   1,262 
Leasehold improvements  143   143   206   144 
  1,478   1,429   2,002   1,720 
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization  (1,099)  (957)  (1,455)  (1,299)
Net carrying amount $379  $472  $547  $421 

 

 b.Depreciation and amortization expenses totaled approximately $142,000$158,000 and $152,000$139,000 for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively.

 

NOTE 65 - LIABILITY FOR EMPLOYEES RIGHT UPON RETIREMENT

 

Israeli labor law generally requires payment of severance pay upon dismissal of an employee or upon termination of employment in certain other circumstances.

 

Pursuant to section 14 of the Israeli Severance Compensation Act, 1963, some of the Company’s employees are entitled to have monthly deposits, at a rate of 8.33% of their monthly salary, made in their name with insurance companies. Payments in accordance with section 14 relieve the Company from any future severance payments to these employees.

 

The severance pay liability of the Company for the rest of its Israeli employees, which reflects the undiscounted amount of the liability, is based upon the number of years of service and the latest monthly salary. The severance pay liability is partly covered by insurance policies and by regular deposits with recognized severance payment funds. The Company may only withdraw funds previously deposited for savings in connection with the payment of severance. The severance pay expenses were approximately $130,000$197,000 and $211,000$186,000 for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively.

 

Defined contribution plan expenses were approximately $157,000$294,000 and $213,000$244,000 for the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively.

 

The Company expects contribution plan expenses in 20172020 to be approximately $198,000.$297,000.

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 7 - loan

2013 Security and Loan Agreement

a.Loan and Security Agreement
On October 23, 2013, the Company and InspireMD Ltd. entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan and Security Agreement”), pursuant to which a lender made a term loan to the Company and InspireMD Ltd. in the aggregate amount of $10 million (the “Loan”). The annual interest rate on the Loan is prime plus 4%, but shall not be reduced below 10.5%. Payments under the Loan and Security Agreement are for the interest portion only for 9 months, followed by 30 monthly payments of principal and interest through the scheduled maturity date on February 1, 2017.
The Company is permitted to prepay all or a portion of the Loan. However, any prepayments of the Loan will be subject to a penalty of (i) 2%, if the prepayment occurs within 12 months of the Loan being requested by the Company and InspireMD Ltd. (the “Advance Date”), (ii) 1%, if the prepayment occurs between 12 and 24 months after the Advance Date, and (iii) 0.5%, if the prepayment occurs more than 24 months after the Advance Date. The Company and InspireMD Ltd. will also pay the lender an aggregate end of term charge (the “End of Term Charge”) of $500,000 when the Loan is paid in full or matures. In addition, upon the occurrence of a change in control, the Company shall prepay the outstanding amount of all principal and accrued interest through the prepayment date and all unpaid lender’s fees and expenses accrued to the date of the repayment (including the End of Term Charge) together with the penalties stated above.
b.Security Documents
On October 23, 2013, InspireMD Ltd. issued the lender a Fixed Charge Debenture and a Floating Charge Debenture (collectively, the “Israeli Security Agreements”) in order to create a security interest in all the assets and property of InspireMD Ltd., securing the Company’s and InspireMD Ltd.’s obligations under the Loan and Security Agreement. In addition, on October 23, 2013 and November 8, 2013, the Company entered into Deposit Account Control Agreements with the lender and two banking institutions in the US (the “Deposit Account Control Agreements”) in order to perfect the lender’s security interest in the Company’s bank account. Pursuant to the Loan and Security Agreement, the Israeli Security Agreements and the Deposit Account Control Agreement, the Company’s obligations to the lender are secured by a first priority perfected security interest in all of the assets and properties of the Company and InspireMD Ltd., other than the intellectual property of the Company and InspireMD Ltd.
The Company is required under the Loan and Security Agreement to maintain at all times in the bank accounts under the Deposit Account Control Agreements, cash and cash equivalents which may include cash collected from Accounts Receivable by Inspire M.D Ltd. and InspireM.D GmbH within the previous 7 days, and cash transferred to Inspire M.D Ltd. for the settlement of Permitted Indebtedness within the following 7 days, in each unrestricted and unencumbered, in an aggregate amount of at least the lesser of (a) an amount equal to one hundred percent of the then outstanding principal amount of the Term Loan Advance and (b) an amount equal to seventy-five percent of the aggregate amount of all of Borrower’s worldwide cash and cash equivalents.
As of December 31, 2016, the future principal payments obligation for the Loan to be repaid in 2017 is $2,237,000.

 

F-17F-14
 

 

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

c.Loan Amendment
On June 13, 2016, the Company amended (the “Amendment”) the Loan and Security Agreement, dated October 23, 2013, as amended, to provide that, among other things, the principal payment shall be suspended for a four month period beginning May 1, 2016, provided that the Company receives unrestricted and unencumbered net cash proceeds in an amount of at least $10 million from the sale of the Company’s equity securities with investors acceptable to the lender on or prior to June 30, 2016. The Amendment also modified the term loan maturity date under the Loan and security Agreement to (i) April 1, 2017, if the Company does not complete such sale of its equity securities and the lender does not waive such condition to complete such sale prior to June 30, 2016, or (ii) June 1, 2017, if the Company completes such sale of its equity securities, or if the lender waives such condition to complete such sale of its equity securities, prior to June 30, 2016. In addition, the Company agreed to increase the end of term charge from $500,000 to $520,000 on the earliest to occur of February 1, 2017, or when the loan is paid in full or matures. In connection with the Amendment, the Company and its subsidiary granted a security interest in their intellectual property to the lender (see Note 11b). In connection with the Amendment, the Company issued the lender warrants to purchase up to the number of shares of common stock equal to $182,399 divided by (i) the lowest effective price per share, determined on a common stock-equivalent basis, for which the Company’s equity securities are sold and issued by the Company in an equity financing in which the Company receives unrestricted aggregate gross cash proceeds of at least $7.5 million, subject to adjustment from time to time in accordance with the terms of the warrant agreement, or (ii) if such equity financing shall not have been consummated on or before July 30, 2016, or if, prior to the consummation of such equity financing, there shall be a transaction involving a change of control or a dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the Company, then the closing price of a share of common stock on June 13, 2016, subject to adjustment thereafter from time to time in accordance with the terms of the warrant agreement. The warrants are immediately exercisable and have a five year term. The principal payments of May 1, 2016 and June 1, 2016 were suspended and although the July 2016 Offering (see Note 10a) had not closed prior to June 30, 2016, the lender agreed to waive the July 1, 2016 principal payment. Additionally, on July 6, 2016, the lender agreed to waive the August 1, 2016 principal payment, as well. The Loan under the Loan and Security Agreement, as amended by the Amendment, matures on June 1, 2017.
The Company has concluded that the above changes to the terms of the Loan and security Agreement do not constitute a troubled debt restructuring as no concession has been granted. As such, the Company applied the guidance in ASC 470-50, Modifications and Extinguishments. The accounting treatment is determined by whether (1) the Investors remain the same and (2) the change in the debt terms is considered substantial.

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

Since the lenders remained the same before and after the Amendment, the Company has made a quantitative test, in order to determine whether the Loan and security Agreement, as amended by the Amendment, is substantially different from the Loan and security Agreement prior to the Amendment became effective. According to ASC 470-50-40-10, from the debtor’s perspective, an exchange of debt instruments between or a modification of a debt instrument by a debtor and a creditor is deemed to have been accomplished with debt instruments that are substantially different if the present value of the cash flows under the terms of the new debt instrument is at least 10 percent different from the present value of the remaining cash flows under the terms of the original instrument. If the terms of a debt instrument are changed or modified and the cash flow effect on a present value basis is less than 10 percent, the debt instruments are not considered to be substantially different.

Based on the accounting analysis performed, the Company concluded that the Loan and security Agreement, as amended by the Amendment, was not substantially different from the Loan and security Agreement prior to the Amendment becoming effective, and, as such, accounted for the Amendment as a modification. Accordingly, no gain or loss was recorded and a new effective interest rate was established based on the carrying value of the Loan and security Agreement prior to the Amendment became effective and the revised cash flows pursuant to the Loan and security Agreement, as amended by the Amendment, including the fair value of the warrants issued to the lender.

Following the closing of the July 2016 Offering (see Note 10a), pursuant to the warrant agreement discussed above, the Company issued to the lender warrants to purchase 38,691 shares of common stock. The warrants are exercisable immediately and have a term of exercise of 5 years from the date of issuance and an exercise price of $4.71. Given the settlement mechanism described above, the warrants as of the Amendment date were classified as a liability and subsequently, upon closing of the July 2016 Offering, were reclassified to equity.

F-19

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TOTHE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 

NOTE 86 - RELATED PARTIES TRANSACTIONSNET LOSS PER SHARE:

 

a.Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)

On January 21, 2016,Set forth below is data taken into account in the Company and the Company’s former CEO entered into a fourth amendment to the former CEO’s Employment Agreement by and between the Company and the former CEO, in order to, among other things, (i) modify the termcomputation of the former CEO’s employment to end on the earlier of June 30, 2016 or the date upon which a new president and/or CEO (or executive performing a similar role) commences employment with the Company (or, if such individual is promoted internally, the date such individual is promoted to the position of president and/or chief executive officer); and (ii) provide that, during the remaining term of his employment, the former CEO will receive (A) 50% of his base salary in cash payments, for all days that the CEO works during the remaining term of his employment, at the monthly rate of $18,750, payable in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll practices, and (B) a lump-sum payment equivalent to 50% of the former CEO’s base salary through June 30, 2016, at the monthly rate of $18,750, payable within 20 business days from the earlier of (x) the Company raising an aggregate of $5 million from investors, or (y) June 30, 2016.loss per share:

 

On June 6, 2016, the former CEO resigned from all officer and director positions with the Company, and a new president and CEO commenced employment with the Company.

On June 6, 2016, the Company appointed a new CEO, who was then the Company’s executive vice president and chief operating officer. In connection with his appointment, the Company and the CEO entered into a fourth amendment (the “Fourth Amendment”) to the employment agreement by and between the Company and the CEO, in order to, among other things, (i) change the title of his position to president and chief executive officer; (ii) modify the term of the CEO’s employment to (a) continue until May 31, 2017, with the CEO resigning as a member of the Board of Directors at the end of such term if requested by the Company and (b) provide that in the event that the term is not extended beyond May 31, 2017 by mutual agreement of the parties and the Company does not offer the CEO a position as CEO and/or chief operating officer on the same or more favorable terms with a base salary that is at least 10% greater than his current base salary, the CEO’s termination will be deemed a termination without cause; and (iii) amend the terms and conditions of the CEO’s compensation, as described below.

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

Pursuant to the Fourth Amendment, for the period beginning on June 1, 2016 and ending on the earlier of (i) the closing of a transaction with investors where the Company raises an aggregate of $5 million (the “Financing”) and (ii) March 15, 2017, the CEO will receive 50% of his base salary in cash payments, payable in accordance with the Company’s regular payroll practices, with the remaining 50% of his base salary paid in a lump-sum payment on the first to occur of (a) the first payroll period that is on or after the 20th business day following the Financing or (b) March 15, 2017 (such earlier date, the “Reduction Amount Payment Date”). The Fourth Amendment also amends the terms of the CEO’s bonus compensation to provide that (i) the CEO is eligible to receive annual bonus compensation in an amount equal to 100% of his base salary upon the achievement of reasonable target objectives and performance goals as may be determined by the Board in consultation with the CEO and (ii) on the Reduction Amount Payment Date, the CEO will receive a lump-sum retention bonus in an amount equal to $106,458, subject to the CEO’s continued employment through such date.

  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
  ($ in thousands expect
share and share data)
 
       
Net Loss $(10,040) $(7,240)
         
Adjustments due to extinguishment and accretion of series D and series C preferred shares      (456)
Adjusted Loss $(10,040) $(7,696)
Weighted average of Ordinary Shares and Pre-Funded        
Warrants outstanding during the period  2,089,964   461,539 
Basic and diluted loss per share (dollars) $(4.80) $(16.67)

 

The Fourth Amendment further provides that on or within 20 business days of the closing of the Financing, the CEO will be granted, subject to approval of the Board of Directors and the CEO’s continued employment by the Company through the applicable grant date, (i) a nonqualified stock option relating to thetotal number of shares of the Company’s common stock equalrelated to 2% of the Company’s outstanding common stock on the date of the closing of the Financing (the “Financing Option”) and (ii) a restircted stock award equal to 2% of the Company’s outstanding common stock on the date of the closing of the Financing (the “Financing Restricted Stock Award”), in each case, subject to the terms and conditions of the Company’s 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan and a nonqualified stock option agreement and aoptions, warrants, restricted stock, award agreement to be entered into byrestricted stock units, Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, Series D Convertible Preferred Stock and placement agent units excluded from the Companycalculations of diluted loss per share were 4,707,230 and 880,913 for the CEO. From the July 2016 Offering, the Company received more than an aggregate of $5 million,years ended December 31, 2019 and as such, on July 25, 2016, the CEO was granted the Financing Option to purchase 70,500 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $4.75, which is equal to the closing fair market value of common stock on the date of grant, vesting on the first anniversary of the date of the grant, and on August 1, 2016, the CEO was granted the Financing Restricted Stock Award of 70,500 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, vesting on the first anniversary of the date of the grant.

In calculating the fair value of the above options the Company used the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%; expected term of 5 years; expected volatility of 87.29%; and risk-free interest rate of 1.22%.

The fair value of the above options, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was approximately $0.2 million.

The fair value of the above restricted shares of common stock, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was approximately $0.3 million.

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

b.On January 16, 2016, the Board of Directors appointed a new director and Vice Chairman of the Board, effective as of January 22, 2016, with a term expiring at the Company’s 2017 annual meeting of stockholders. On April 30, 2016, in connection with his appointment, the new director was granted an option to purchase 31,202 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to the closing fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant on April 30, 2016, subject to the terms and conditions of the the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”)and the 2011 UMBRELLA Option Plan. Options to purchase 7,801 shares of Common Stock vest and become exercisable immediately upon the time of grant, and, until all 31,202 options shall have vested, options to purchase 7,801 shares of common stock will vest and become exercisable each time upon (i) the Company raising at least $15 million through an equity offering; (ii) the Company’s market cap becoming equal to or greater than $25 million; (iii) the Company receiving research coverage by three new analysts at a leading investment bank; or (iv) the tripling of the Company’s market cap from the date of appointment. Any of the foregoing conditions, if achieved following the director’s appointment but prior to April 30, 2016, would have been deemed satisfied on the date of grant. However, in the event (i) of the director’s death or permanent disability, (ii) a change in control (as defined in the Plan) or (iii) if the director is asked to resign for any reason other than cause (as defined in the Company’s form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under its Plan), the options shall vest immediately in full. The options have a term of 10 years from the date of grant and the exercise price may be paid in either cash or on a cashless basis.
The fair value of options with market cap related conditions reflect the probability of achieving the respective condition, and are recognized through the date in which it is expected to be met. The fair value of such options was determined using the Monte-Carlo option-pricing model with the following primary assumptions: the probability to achieve various gross proceeds in future offerings, dividend yield of 0%; expected term of 10 years; expected volatility of 85.73%; and risk-free interest rate of 1.81%. The fair value of the above options with market conditions, using the Monte-Carlo option-pricing model, was approximately $96,000.
The remaining tranches would vest upon achievment of performance conditions. Accordingly, the fair value of such options would be recognized based upon the number of options expected to vest and when the occurrence of the condition is considered probable.
In calculating the fair value of the above options with performance conditions the Company used the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0%; expected term of 5.5 years; expected volatility of 85.81%; and risk-free interest rate of 1.25%. The fair value of the above options with performance conditions, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was approximately $66,000.
c.On January 26, 2016 the Company entered into an option cancellation and release agreement with certain directors, the former CEO, the CEO who at the time was acting as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer and the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) (collectively “the Optionholders”), pursuant to which the parties agreed to cancel options to purchase an aggregate of 16,910 shares of common stock of the Company previously granted to each of the Optionholders. For accounting purposes, the cancellation was treated as a settlement for no consideration and accordingly all remaining unrecognized compensation cost amounting to approximately $800,000 was recognized.

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

d.During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company granted stock options to directors to purchase a total of 134,232 and 5,555 shares of the Company’s common stock,2018, respectively. The options have exercise prices of $3.04 - $12.50 and $42.50-$195.00, per share, respectively, which were the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of each respective grant.Of the 134,232 options granted in 2016, 82,500 options are subject to a three-year vesting period with one-third of such awards vesting each year, 20,530 options were in lieu of cash compensation that was owed to them for their services as directors for the fourth quarter of 2015 and the first and second quarters of 2016 and are fully vested as of their grant date and the remaining options are subject to certain market and performance conditions. Of the 5,555 options granted in 2015, 4,320 options were in lieu of cash compensation that was owed to them for their services as directors for the third and fourth quarters of 2014 and the first through third quarter of 2015 and are fully vested as of their grant date and the remaining options are subject to a three-year vesting period, with one-third of such awards vesting each year.

The fair value of the above options, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was approximately $526,000 and $338,000, respectively.

e.Balances with related parties:

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
  ($ in thousands) 
Current liabilities:        
Other accounts payable $77  $132 

f.Transactions with related parties:

  Year ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
  ($ in thousands) 
         

Compensation expenses (including share based compensation)

 $1,499  $1,892 

F-23

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 

NOTE 97 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES

 

a.Lease commitments:Agreements

 

1)The CompanyCompany’s Israeli subsidiary has a lease agreement for its facilitiesa facility in Israel, which expires on December 31, 2020 with an option to extend the agreement for two additional years until December 31, 2022 under the terms stipulated in the U.S which expiresagreement (the Option Period). The Option Period was taken in October 2017.consideration when calculating the operating lease right of use assets and liabilities since it is reasonably certain that the company will exercise the option.

The Subsidiary has a lease agreement for a facility in Israel, which expires on December 31, 2018 with an option to extend the agreement for two additional years until December 31, 2020 under the terms stipulated in the agreement.

Rent expense included in the consolidated statements of operations totaled approximately $319,000 and $383,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 excludes $101,000, which is recorded under “Restructuring and impairment” in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 3.

As of December 31, 2016, the aggregate future minimum lease obligations for office rent under non-cancelable operating lease agreements are as follows:

  ($ in thousands) 
Year Ended December 31:    
2017 $326 
2018  276 
  $602 

2)The Company leases its motor vehicles under operating lease agreements. As of
3)Operating lease cost for the year ended December 31, 2016,2019 was comprised of the aggregate non-cancelable future minimumfollowing:

Twelve months ended

December 31

2019

($ in

thousands)

Operating lease obligations for motor vehicles were approximately $6,000.expense358
Short-term lease expense8
Variable lease expense-
366

Supplemental information related to leases are as follows:

December 31
2019

($ in

thousands)

Operating lease right-of-use assets937
Current Operating lease liabilities(362)
Non-current operating lease liabilities(653)

Other information:

Operating cash flows from operating leases (cash paid in thousands)(366)
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term1.33
Weighted Average Discount Rate9.07%

Maturities of lease liabilities are as follows:

  Amount 
  ($ in thousands) 
2020  388 
2021  389 
2022  360 
Total lease payments  1,137 
Less imputed interest  (122)
Total  1,015 

4)ASC 840 Disclosures

The Company elected the modified retrospective transition method and included the following tables previously disclosed.

Future contractual obligations under the abovementioned operating lease agreements (not including the extension option) as of December 31, 2018 are as follows:

  Amount 
  

U.S. dollars

in thousands

 
2019  337 
2020  357 
2021  26 
Total  720 

F-15

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 

b.      Liens and pledges:NOTE 7 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (continued):

 

The Company’s obligations under the Loan and Security Agreement were secured by the Israeli Security Agreements and the Deposit Account Control Agreements on all of the assets and properties of the Company and InspireMD Ltd., other than the intellectual property of the Company and InspireMD Ltd. See Note 7.

c.      Litigation:

b.Litigation:

 

In December 2012,July 2019, a former service provider of InspireMD GmbHdistributor filed a claim withsuit seeking damages from the Labor Court in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the amount of $193,378 plus interest (6% in dollars or 18.5% in pesos), social benefits, legal expenses and fees (25% of the award) against InspireMD Ltd. and InspireMD GmbH. The Company settled with the plaintiff in the amount of $80,000 plus $20,000 for legal fees, which was approved by the Labor Court and paid by the Company in March 2016.

The Company received written communication from a distributor to provide unspecified compensationCompany’s subsidiary for pre-paid goods subject to the voluntary field action.action (from April 2014) amounting to €1,830,000 (which is approximately $2.0 million), or alternatively €1,024,000 (which is approximately $1.1 million). After considering the views of its legal counsel as well as other factors, the Company’s management believes that there is a reasonably possible likelihood of a loss from any related future proceedings would range from a minimal amount up to 1,075,000 Euros.

On April 26, 2016 the Company received a suit seeking damages from the Company amounting to $2.2 million in cash and unspecified compensation in equity in connection with certain finders’ fees. The Company’s management, after considering the views of its legal counsel as well as other factors, is of the opinion that a loss to the Company is neither probable nor in an amount or range of loss that is estimable.€1,830,000.

 

In July 2016, a service provider filed a suit seeking damages from the Company’s subsidiary amounting to $1,967,822$1,967,822. The Company’s management, after consideringsubsidiary and the viewsplaintiff have entered into a confidential settlement agreement in the amount of its legal counsel$600,000, and on April 24, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal, dismissing all claims in this action. On April 25, 2019, the court denied as well as other factors, ismoot all pending motions. The related increase in provision of $354,000 was recorded to “Research and development expense” within the opinion that a loss toConsolidated Statements of Operations for the Company is neither probable nor in an amount or range of loss that is estimable.year ended December 31, 2019.

 

NOTE 108 - EQUITY

 

a.Share capital

 

The Company’s common sharesstock are listed on the NYSE MKT.American.

 

On September 30, 2015,February 7, 2018, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware a Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a one-for-tenone-for-thirty-five reverse stock split of its common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, , effective as of October 1, 2015,February 7, 2018, which decreased the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock and restricted sharesstock as of common stockDecember 31, 2017 from 3.11.5 million shares to 0.3 million shares. The Company’s authorized common stock was decreased from 125 million30 thousand shares (adjusted to 50 million shares.2019 Reverse Split).

 

On May 25, 2016 the Company filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware a Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the Company’s number of authorized shares of common stock from 50 million to 150 million.

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

On September 28, 2016,March 27, 2019, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware a Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a one-for-twenty fiveone-for-fifty reverse stock split of its common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, , effective as of October 7, 2016,March 29, 2019, which decreased the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock and restricted stock as of December 31, 2018 from 38.4 million shares to 769 thousand shares.

All related share and per share data have been retroactively applied to the financial statements and their related notes for all periods presented.

F-16

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 8 – EQUITY (continued):

Status of Share Capital as of December 31, 2019

During 2018, the Company made multiple transactions related to the capital structure. Following either redemption or conversion of the company’s preferred stock, as of December 31, 2019, the Company has 17,303 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding (convertible into 555,138 shares of common stock) out of 442,424 shares originally issued, 34,370 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding (convertible into 122,204 shares of common stock) out of 1,069,822 shares originally issued and no Series D Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding. The respective certificate of designation for our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock contains a full ratchet anti-dilution price protection to be triggered upon issuance of equity or equity-linked securities at an effective common stock purchase price of less than the conversion price in effect, so the number of shares of common stock from 35.7 million shares to 1.4 million shares.issuable upon conversion of the Series B or C Convertible Preferred Stock could increase if another equity financing is completed at a price lower than the current conversion price of $1.80 per share.

 

Series D Convertible Preferred Stock and amendments to existing preferred stock through December 31, 2017 in connection with the Series D Private Placement

On December 1, 2017, as part of a planned recapitalization, the Company sold shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series D Preferred Stock”) to an institutional investor (“Series D Investor”) in a private placement pursuant to a securities purchase agreement (the “SPA”), dated November 28, 2017, for aggregate gross proceeds of $750,000. The SPA contained a “most favored nation” provision, which provided that, until the Company consummates a “Qualified Offering”, in the event the Company undertakes, or enter into any agreement to undertake, the issuance and sale of common stock and/or common stock equivalents to third party investors for cash (a “Subsequent Financing”), the Series D Investor may elect, in its sole discretion, to exchange all or some of the Series D Preferred Stock then held by such investor for any securities or units issued in such Subsequent Financing on a $1.00 per stated value for $1.00 new subscription amount basis (the “Series D Exchange Right”). The surrender of Series D Preferred Stock was to be in lieu of any cash subscription amount required for the participation in such Subsequent Financing. The Series D Investor also had the option to exchange their Series D Preferred Stock into the securities issued in a Qualified Offering upon consummation of a Qualified Offering on a $1.00 per stated value for $1.00 new subscription amount basis.

F-17

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 8 – EQUITY (continued):

The Company also agreed to use 12.5% of the proceeds from any subsequent offering of the Company’s securities to redeem the outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Series D Investor until such time that the Company has redeemed, in the aggregate, at least $1 million of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, up to $1.5 million of stated value of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (“Redemption Obligation of Series B”).

In addition, in accordance with the original SPA, the certificate of designation for the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock was amended in December 2017 to provide for an automatic exchange of each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock upon the consummation of a Qualified Offering subject to the beneficial ownership limitation.

Furthermore, the original SPA provided that, upon the consummation of a Qualified Offering, the shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Series D Investor would be automatically exchanged into the securities sold by the Company in a Qualified Offering upon the terms set forth in the Agreement. However, under the rules of the NYSE American, the Company was required to obtain shareholder approval for the exchange by such purchaser of any securities in the Qualified Offering that represent 20% or more of the Company’s total shares of common stock outstanding immediately prior to such offering.

As of the date of the SPA, the Company analyzed the classification of the Redemption Obligation of Series B of the Company regarding the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock as agreed upon in the SPA. Based on ASC 480-10-S99 the Company determined that, as of the date of the SPA, since the Redemption Obligation of Series B was outside of its control, the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock was considered as contingently redeemable upon the occurrence of an event that is outside of its control and should be classified as a mezzanine equity. The Company determined that, as of the date of the SPA, Subsequent Financing and the related payment of Redemption Obligation of Series B was considered to be outside of the Company’s control. Accordingly, as of the date of the SPA, the redemption amount net of the embedded derivative (as described below), which amounts to $934,000, was classified as “Redeemable Preferred Shares” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

F-18

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 8 – EQUITY (continued):

In addition, as of the date of the SPA, the Company analyzed whether the conversion feature embedded in the shares of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock subject to the Redemption Obligation of Series B should be bifurcated. As certain shares of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock was contingently redeemable as of the date of the SPA, the host contract was determined to be akin to debt, and the other criteria under ASC 815-15-25-1 were met, an embedded derivative was separated from the host contract and accounted for as a derivative instrument pursuant to Subtopic 815-10. As of the date of the SPA, the embedded derivative was valued at $66,000.

Placement Agent Unit Purchase Option Exercise and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Conversion

During January and February 2018, the placement agent from the public offering that closed in July 2016 exercised its unit purchase option to purchase 13,508 units and received 13,508 shares of Series B Preferred Stock and Series A warrants to purchase 31 shares of common stock. The placement agent subsequently converted its Series B Preferred Stock and received an aggregate of 2,229 shares of common stock. We received an aggregate of $557,205 from the placement agent for the exercise of the unit purchase option.

Series D Amendments and 2018 Equity Offerings

On February 21, 2018, the SPA was amended (“February 2018 SPA amendment”) to require the Company (i) to use 15% of the proceeds from any subsequent offering of the Company’s securities that is not a Qualified Offering to redeem the outstanding shares of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock held by the Series D Investor at a per share purchase price equal to the stated value of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, and (ii) upon closing of any subsequent offering that is a Qualified Offering, to exchange all remaining outstanding shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock held by the Series D Investor for any securities issued in such Qualified Offering on a $1.00 per stated value for $1.00 new subscription amount basis (subject to the beneficial ownership limitation set forth in the certificate of designation for the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock). The February 2018 SPA amendment provided that in the event that the Company fails, or is unable, to issue securities issued in the Qualified Offering to the Series D Investor in exchange for such investor’s remaining Series C Convertible Preferred Stock due to limitations mandated by the NYSE American, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or for any other reason, the Company would be required to offer to purchase from such investor those shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock not exchanged for the securities sold in the Qualified Offering at a per share purchase price equal to the stated value of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. This requirement to purchase from the Series D Investor those shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock not exchanged for the securities sold in the Qualified Offering at a per share purchase price equal to the stated value of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in case of a Qualified Offering, and the requirement to use 15% of the proceeds from any subsequent offering of the Company’s securities that is not a Qualified Offering to redeem the outstanding shares of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock held by the Series D Investor at a per share purchase price equal to the stated value of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock are referred to as “Redemption Obligation of Series C.”

F-19

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 8 – EQUITY (continued):

For accounting purposes, as of the effective date of the February 2018 SPA amendment, the Company analyzed the classification of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in light of the Redemption Obligation of Series C regarding such preferred stock held by the Series D Investor, as agreed upon in the February 2018 SPA amendment. Based on ASC 480-10-S99 the Company determined that since the Redemption Obligation of Series C may occur upon contingent events, such as subsequent financing transactions not meeting the threshold for a Qualified Offering, that are not solely within the Company’s control, as of the effective date of the February 2018 SPA amendment the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock was considered as contingently redeemable and should be classified outside of permanent equity, within mezzanine equity.

In addition, as of the effective date of the February 2018 SPA amendment, the Company analyzed whether the conversion feature embedded in the shares of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock subject to the Redemption Obligation of Series C should be bifurcated. As certain shares of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock were contingently redeemable, as of the effective date of the February 2018 SPA amendment, the host contract was determined to be akin to debt, and the conversion feature not clearly and closely to the debt host given the anti-dilution protection included in the terms of these Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. Consequently, an embedded derivative was separated from the host contract and accounted for as a derivative instrument pursuant to Subtopic 815-10.

As of the effective date of the February 2018 SPA amendment, the Company classified an amount of $3,200,000 from permanent equity to “Redeemable Preferred Shares” and “Derivative Liability” in an amount of $2,580,000 and $620,000, respectively.

The Company values Level 3 derivative liability using an internally developed valuation model, whose inputs include potential equity transactions probability of completing successful fund raising during the relevant period and stock prices.

F-20

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 8 – EQUITY (continued):

On February 26, 2018, the Company and the Series D Investor entered into a waiver agreement (the “Waiver Agreement”) which provided that (i) the Series D Exchange Right, which was provided by the original SPA, would not be applicable to an offering of up to $7,000,000 which occurred no later than March 9, 2018, (ii) the Company shall reduce the conversion price of the Series D Preferred Stock to the public offering price of our common stock in such offering, and (iii) instead of using 15% of the proceeds from such offering to redeem shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock held by the Series D Investor, which was provided by the February 2018 SPA amendment, the Company was required to use 15% of the proceeds from such offering to redeem a portion of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock held by the Series D Investor at a per share purchase price equal to the stated value of the Series D Preferred Stock.

On March 1, 2018, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of 20,000 shares (the “March 2018 Offering”) of the Company’s common stock. The offering price to the public of the shares sold at the March 2018 Offering was $150.00 per share. The Company received gross proceeds of $3.0 million from the offering, before deducting underwriter commissions and discounts and other fees and expenses payable by the Company. In connection with the March 2018 Offering, the Company issued to the underwriter warrants to purchase up to 1,200 shares of common stock, or 6% of the number of shares of common stock sold in the March 2018 Offering (the “March Underwriter Warrants”). The March Underwriter Warrants are exercisable at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, following the date of issuance and ending February 27, 2023, at a price per share equal to $187.50 (125% of the offering price to the public per share).

Pursuant to the SPA, as amended by February 2018 SPA amendment and the Waiver Agreement, following the closing of the offering on March 1, 2018, the Company used $450,000 (representing 15% of the gross proceeds from the March 2018 Offering) to purchase from the Series D Investor 450 shares of the Series D Preferred Stock at a per share purchase price equal to the stated value of the Series D Preferred Stock.

As a result of the March 2018 Offering, the respective conversion price for each of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and the Series D Preferred Stock was reduced to $150.00 per share, and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and the Series D Preferred Stock had increased as follows:

an aggregate of 3,807 additional shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and as payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock, based on 17,303 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of March 1, 2018.
an aggregate of 18,082 additional shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, based on 741,651 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of March 1, 2018.
an aggregate of 2,857 additional shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series D Preferred Stock, based on 750 shares of Series D Preferred Stock outstanding as of March 1, 2018.

For accounting purposes, as of the closing of the March 2018 Offering, the Company analyzed whether the change in the conversion price of the Series D Preferred Stock constitutes an extinguishment for accounting purposes, by comparing the fair value of the Series D Preferred Stock immediately before and after such change in terms. Since the fair value increased substantially, i.e by more than 10%, the change in terms was accounted for as an extinguishment. As a result, the difference between the fair value of the Series D Preferred Stock immediately after the change in term (the reduction of the conversion price from $350.00 per share to $150.00 per share, pursuant to the SPA, as amended by February 2018 SPA amendment and the Waiver Agreement) and the carrying amount immediately before such change, in the amount of $49,000, was added to the basic loss per share attributable to the Company’s common stockholders.

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 8 – EQUITY (continued):

On March 28, 2018, the Company and the Series D Investor entered into the second waiver agreement (the “Second Waiver Agreement”) which provided that (i) the Series D Exchange Right, which was provided by the original SPA, would not be applicable to a subsequent financing consisting solely of shares of common stock, which shall be publicly registered on Form S-3 for gross proceeds to us of up to $5,000,000, to be consummated by not later than April 3, 2018 (the “Planned April 2018 Offering”), (ii) the Company’s obligation to use 15% of the proceeds from any subsequent offering of our securities that is not a Qualified Offering to redeem the outstanding shares of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock held by the Series D Investor, which was provided by the February 2018 SPA amendment, would not be applicable to the Planned April 2018 Offering, (iii) the Company shall reduce the conversion price of the Series D Preferred Stock to the public offering price of our common stock sold in the Planned April 2018 Offering, and (iv) the Company shall use $300,000 of the proceeds from the Planned April 2018 Offering to redeem outstanding shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock held by the Series D Investor at a per share purchase price equal to the stated value of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock.

On April 2, 2018, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of 57,143 shares (the “April 2018 Offering”) of the Company’s common stock at the offering price to the public of $87.50 per share. The Company received gross proceeds of $5.0 million from the offering, before deducting underwriter discounts and commissions and other fees and expenses payable by the Company.

In connection with the April 2018 Offering, the Company issued to the underwriter warrants to purchase up to 3,429 shares of common stock, or 6% of the number of shares of common stock sold in the April 2018 Offering (the “April Underwriter Warrants”). The April Underwriter Warrants are exercisable at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, following the date of issuance and ending March 28, 2023, at a price per share equal to $109.38 (125% of the offering price to the public in the April 2018 Offering).

Pursuant to the SPA, as amended by the February 2018 SPA amendment, the Waiver Agreement and the Second Waiver Agreement, following the closing of the April 2018 Offering, the Company used $300,000 of the net proceeds of the offering to purchase from the Series D Investor 46,875 shares of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock at a per share purchase price equal to the stated value of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock.

As a result of the April 2018 Offering, the conversion price of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock was reduced to $87.50 pursuant to the Second Waiver Agreement, and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series D Preferred Stock increased by an aggregate of 1,429 additional shares of common stock, based on 300 shares of Series D Preferred Stock outstanding as of April 2, 2018.

For accounting purposes, as of the closing of the April 2018 Offering, the Company analyzed whether the change in the conversion price of the Series D Preferred Stock constituted an extinguishment for accounting purposes, by comparing the fair value of the Series D Preferred Stock immediately before and after such change in terms. Since the fair value increased substantially, i.e by more than 10%, the change in terms was accounted for as an extinguishment. As a result, the difference between the fair value of the Series D Preferred Stock immediately after the change in term (the further reduction of the conversion price from $150.00 per share to $87.50 per share, pursuant to the SPA, as amended by February 2018 SPA amendment, the Waiver Agreement and the Second Waiver Agreement) and the carrying amount immediately before such change, in the amount of $32,000, was subtracted from the basic loss per share attributable to the Company’s common stockholders.

F-22

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 8 – EQUITY (continued):

As of March 28, 2018, the date of the underwriting agreement for the April 2018 Offering, the respective conversion price of the outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock was reduced to $87.50 pursuant to the anti-dilution adjustment provisions of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock had increased as follows:

an aggregate of 4,759 additional shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and as payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock, based on 17,303 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of March 28, 2018.
an aggregate of 13,766 additional shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, based on 451,695 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of March 28, 2018.

On June 28, 2018, the Company and the Series D Investor entered into a letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) which further amended the SPA to provide that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the prior agreements, in the event the Company consummates a Qualified Offering in which the Series D Investor and its affiliates invest at least $3 million, (i) instead of an automatic exchange of all outstanding shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock held by the Series D Investor into securities issued in a Qualified Offering on a $1.00 per stated value for $1.00 new subscription amount basis, all outstanding shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock held by the Series D Investor will be redeemed at a per share purchase price equal to the stated value of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, and (ii) all outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock will be redeemed at a per share purchase price equal to the stated value of the Series D Preferred Stock.

On June 29, 2018, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement relating to an underwritten public offering (the “July 2018 Offering”) of (i) 217,029 common units (“Common Units”), with each Common Unit being comprised of one share of the Company’s common stock and one Series D warrant (collectively, the “Series D Warrants”) to purchase one share of common stock and (ii) 449,640 pre-funded units (“Pre-Funded Units”), with each Pre-Funded Unit being comprised of one pre-funded warrant (collectively, the “Pre-Funded Warrants”) to purchase one share of common stock and one Series D Warrant, which closed on July 3, 2018. The offering price to the public was $15.00 per Common Unit and $14.50 per Pre-Funded Unit. The Company also granted the Underwriter a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 100,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $14.50 per share and/or up to 100,000 additional Series D Warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.50 per Series D Warrant, less the underwriting discounts and commissions of $1.015 per share and $0.035 per Series D Warrant. The Underwriter exercised its option to purchase an additional 100,000 Series D Warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock.

Pursuant to the Letter Agreement, the Company had revised its estimate as of June 30, 2018, of the expected timing of redemption of Series C Convertible Preferred stock to the estimated closing date of the July 2018 Offering (July 3, 2018). As a result, the total of $438,000 (accretion of the redeemable preferred shares) was recorded against Additional paid-in capital and added to basic loss per share attributable to the Company’s common stockholders.

F-23

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 8 – EQUITY (continued):

The Series D Warrants included in the Common Units and the Pre-Funded Units are immediately exercisable at a price of $15.00 per share of common stock, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances, and expire five years from the date of issuance.

Each Pre-Funded Warrant contained in a Pre-Funded Unit is exercisable for 0.02 share of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The Pre-Funded Warrants are immediately exercisable and may be exercised at any time until all of the Pre-Funded Warrants are exercised in full.

Pursuant to the full ratchet anti-dilution adjustment provisions in the respective certificate of designation for the Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, the conversion price of the outstanding shares of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock was reduced to $15.00 per share, effective as of the date of the underwriting agreement entered for the July 2018 Offering, and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock had increased as follows:

an aggregate of 55,197 additional shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and as payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock, based on 17,303 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of June 29, 2018.
an aggregate of 133,929 additional shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, based on 378,840 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of June 29, 2018.

On July 2, 2018, the Company filed with the office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock which removed the provision providing for an automatic exchange of all outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock into securities issued in a Qualified Offering on a $1.00 per stated value for $1.00 new subscription amount basis upon a Qualified Offering.

The Company received gross proceeds of $9.8 million from the July 2018 Offering, before deducting underwriter discounts and commissions and other fees and expenses payable by the Company.

For the purpose of calculating basic net loss per share, the additional shares of common stock that are issuable upon exercise of the Pre-funded Warrants have been included since the shares are issuable for a negligible consideration, as determined by the Company according to ASC 260-10-45-13, and have no vesting or other contingencies associated with them.

Pursuant to the underwriting agreement relating to the July 2018 Offering, the Company, upon closing of the July 2018 Offering, issued to the underwriter warrants to purchase up to 40,000 shares of common stock, or 6% of the aggregate number of shares of common stock sold in the July 2018 Offering (including the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Pre-Funded Warrants sold in the July 2018 Offering). The underwriter warrants are exercisable at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, following the date of issuance and ending July 3, 2023, at a price per share equal to $18.75 (125% of the offering price to the public per Common Unit).

Pursuant to the Letter Agreement, on July 3, 2018, upon closing of the July 2018 Offering, which was a Qualified Offering, the Company used $2,264,269 of the net proceeds of the July 2018 Offering to redeem 306,917 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and 300 shares of Series D Preferred Stock held by the Series D Investor.

F-24

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 8 – EQUITY (continued):

On April 8, 2019, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of 486,957 shares of the Company’s common stock at the offering price to the public of $5.00 per share. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $2 million from the offering, after deducting underwriter discounts and commissions and other fees and expenses payable by the Company. In connection with this public offering, on April 12, 2019, the underwriter partially exercised its over-allotment option and purchased an additional 12,393 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $5.00 per share. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $47,000 from the exercise of the over-allotment option.

In connection with the offering, the Company issued to the underwriter warrants to purchase up to 34,955 shares of common stock, or 7% of the shares sold in the offering, including the shares issued pursuant to the over-allotment option (the “April 2019 Underwriter Warrants”). The April 2019 Underwriter Warrants are exercisable at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, following the date of issuance and ending on April 4, 2024, at an exercise price of $6.25 per share (125% of the offering price to the public per share).

Upon execution of the underwriting agreement, the respective conversion price of the outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Series C Convertible Preferred Stock was reduced to $5.00 pursuant to the anti-dilution adjustment provisions of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock had increased as follows:

an aggregate of 133,233 additional shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, including the payment of the cumulative dividends accrued thereunder in common stock, based on 17,303 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of April 4, 2019.
an aggregate of 50,708 additional shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, based on 59,423 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding as of April 4, 2019.

On September 19, 2019, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement relating to an underwritten public offering (the “September 2019 Offering”) of (i) 539,000 common units (“2019 Common Units”), with each 2019 Common Unit being comprised of one share of the Company’s common stock and one Series E warrant (collectively, the “Series E Warrants”) to purchase one share of common stock and (ii) 2,238,777 pre-funded units (“2019 Pre-Funded Units”), with each 2019 Pre-Funded Unit being comprised of one pre-funded warrant (collectively, the “2019 Pre-Funded Warrants”) to purchase one share of common stock and one Series E Warrant, which closed on September 24, 2019. The offering price to the public was $1.80 per 2019 Common Unit and $1.79 per 2019 Pre-Funded Unit. In connection with this public offering, on September 24, 2019, the underwriter partially exercised its over-allotment option and purchased an additional Series E Warrants to purchase 194,444 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.01 per Series E Warrant.

The Series E Warrants included in the 2019 Common Units and the 2019 Pre-Funded Units are immediately exercisable at a price of $1.80 per share of common stock, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances, and expire five years from the date of issuance.

Each 2019 Pre-Funded Warrant contained in a 2019 Pre-Funded Unit is exercisable for one share of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The 2019 Pre-Funded Warrants are immediately exercisable and may be exercised at any time until all of the 2019 Pre-Funded Warrants are exercised in full.

In connection with the offering, the Company issued to the underwriter warrants to purchase up to 194,444 shares of common stock, or 7% of the shares sold in the offering, including the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the 2019 Pre-Funded Warrants sold in the offering (the “September 2019 Underwriter Warrants”). The September 2019 Underwriter Warrants are exercisable at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, following the date of issuance and ending on September 19, 2024, at an exercise price of $2.25 per share (125% of the offering price to the public per 2019 Common Unit).

Pursuant to the full ratchet anti-dilution adjustment provisions in the respective certificate of designation for the Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, the conversion price of the outstanding shares of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock was reduced to $1.80 per share, effective as of the date of the underwriting agreement entered for the September 2019 Offering, and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock had increased as follows:

an aggregate of 355,288 additional shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock and as payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock, based on 17,303 shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding as of September 19, 2019.
an aggregate of 84,253 additional shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock, based on 37,025 shares of Series C Preferred Stock outstanding as of September 19, 2019.

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 8 – EQUITY (continued):

The Company received gross proceeds of $5.0 million from the offering, before deducting underwriter discounts and commissions and other fees and expenses payable by the Company.

For the purpose of calculating basic net loss per share, the additional shares of common stock that are issuable upon exercise of the Pre-funded Warrants have been included since the shares are issuable for a negligible consideration, as determined by the Company according to ASC 260-10-45-13, and have no vesting or other contingencies associated with them.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company issued a total of 2,000,811 shares of its common stock in connection with the exercise of an aggregate of 2,000,811 Pre-Funded Warrants and 2019 Pre-Funded Warrants. The Company received aggregate cash proceeds equal to approximately $35,705 in connection with such exercises. As of December 31, 2019, the outstanding Pre-Funded Warrants are exercisable into 270,000 shares of common stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, the Company issued a total of 417,606 shares of its common stock in connection with the exercise of 20,880,250 Pre-Funded Warrants. The Company received aggregate cash proceeds equal to approximately $208,803 in connection with such exercises. As of December 31, 2018, the outstanding Pre-Funded Warrants were exercisable into 32,034 shares of common stock.

As of December 31, 2019, the Number of Preferred shares the amount each class is convertible into is below:

  Number of Preferred Stock  Number of underlying Common stock 
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock  17,303   555,138*
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock  34,370   122,204 
Total      677,342 

* Including the shares of common stock the holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive as cumulative dividends at the rate per share of 15% per annum of the stated value for five years, payable in cash or common stock, at the Company’s discretion, but excluding effect of future conversion price adjustment, if any.

As of December 31, 2019, the Company has outstanding warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,016,817 shares of common stock as follows:

  Number of
underlying
Common stock
  Weighted
average
exercise price
 
Series A Warrants  1,102  $8,750.00 
Series B Warrants  2,448  $3,500.00 
Series D Warrants  806,698  $15.19 
Series E Warrants  2,972,221  $1.80 
April 2019 Underwriter Warrants  34,955  $6.25 
September 2019 Underwriter Warrants  194,444  $2.25 
Other warrants  4,949  $11,258.00 
         
Total Warrants  4,016,817  $22.95 

As of December 31, 2019, the Company has 155,000,000 authorized 155,000,000 shares of capital stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of which 150,000,000 are shares of common stock and 5,000,000 are shares of “blank check” preferred stock.

 

All related share and per share data have been retroactively applied toIn the financial statements and their related notes for all periods presented.

On March 9, 2015, the Company sold 137,481  sharesevent of its common stock and warrants to purchase 137,481 shares of common stock in a registered direct offering. Each purchaser received a warrant to purchase one share of common stock for each share of common stock that it purchased in the offering. The warrants, which are classified as equity, are exercisable immediately and have a term of exercise of 5 years from the date of issuance and an exercise price of $137.5. This offering resulted in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $12.4 million after deducting placement agent fees and other offering expenses.

On January 26, 2016 the Company entered into option cancellation and release agreements with the Optionholders. See Note 10a.

On March 21, 2016, the Company sold 117,327 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase 58,668 shares of common stock in concurrent underwritten public offering and private placement (the “March 2016 Offering”). The common stock was sold at a price of $14.75 per share and each purchaser received a warrant to purchase one half of one share of common stock for each share of common stock that it purchased in the March 2016 Offering. The warrants, which are classified as equity, are exercisable immediately and have a term of exercise of 5 years from the date of issuance and an exercise price of $14.75. The March 2016 Offering resulted in gross proceeds to the Company of approximately $1.7 million ($1.4 million after deducting underwriting discount, placement agent fees and other offering expenses).

In connection with the March 2016 Offering, on March 21, 2016, the Company issued to the underwriter and placement agent five-year warrants to purchaseour liquidation, dissolution, or winding up, to 5,867 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $18.44 per share. The warrants, which are classified as equity, are exercisable at any time during the period commencing six months following the date of issuance and ending five years from the date of issuance.

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

On July 7, 2016, the Company closed a public offering of 442,424 sharesholders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and accompanying warrants to purchase up to 1,769,696 shares of common stock (the “July 2016 Offering”). Each share of Series BC Convertible Preferred Stock andare entitled to receive the accompanying warrants were sold at a priceamount of $33.00. Each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into 4 shares of common stock reflecting a conversion price equalcash, securities or other property to $8.25 per share. The holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock willwhich such holder would be entitled to receive cumulative dividends at the rate per sharewith respect to such shares of 15% per annum of the stated value for five years, payable in cash orPreferred Stock if such shares had been converted to common stock at the Company’s discretion.immediately prior to such event.

 

The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock will automatically convert into shares after five years from issuance. Additionally, holders of the shares may elect to convert at anytime. The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock has certain anti-dilution provisions. In addition, the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is subject to provisions providing for make-whole payments, pursuant to which, if the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is converted into shares of common stock at any time prior to the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance, the holders will receive all of the dividends that, but for the early conversion, would have otherwise accrued on the applicable shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock being converted for the period commencing on the conversion date and ending on the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance, less the amount of all prior dividends paid on such converted Series B Convertible Preferred Stock before the date of conversion. The warrants are exercisable immediately and have a term of exercise of five years from the date of issuance and have an exercise price of $5.00 per share of common stock.

F-26

 

The Company received gross proceeds of approximately $14.6 million from the July 2016 Offering, before deducting placement agent fees and offering expenses payable by the Company.

For accounting purposes, the Company analyzed the classification of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, including whether the embedded conversion options should be bifurcated. As the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is not redeemable, and the host contract was determined to be akin to equity, the entire instrument was classified as equity.

The Company has also concluded that the warrants accompanying Series B Convertible Preferred Stock are classified as equity, since the warrants bear a fixed conversion ratio and all other criteria for equity classification have been met.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, 130,903 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock were converted into 916,321 shares of common stock.

Following the closing of the July 2016 Offering, pursuant to a warrant agreement (see Note 4), the Company issued to a lender warrants to purchase 38,691 shares of common stock .

As of December 31, 2016 the Company issued total of 2,029,912 warrants to purchase 2,029,912 shares of common stock.

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 

NOTE 8 – EQUITY (continued):

b.Share-Based Compensation

1)On March 28, 2011, the board of directors and stockholders of the Company adopted and approved the InspireMD, Inc. 2011 UMBRELLA Option Plan (the “Umbrella Plan”) which expires on March 27, 2021. Under the Umbrella Plan, as subsequently amended, the Company reserved 20,000 shares of common stock as awards to employees, consultants, and service providers. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had 1,694 shares of common stock available for future issuance under the plans as described above.
 
On December 16, 2013, the board of directors and stockholders of the Company adopted and approved the 2013 Plan. Under the 2013 Plan, the Company initially reserved 20,000 shares of common stock for awards to employees, officers, directors, consultants, and service providers. On September 9, 2015, May 24, 2016 and September 28, 2016, the stockholders approved an amendment to the 2013 Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock available for issuance pursuant to awards under the 2013 Plan by 18,800, 400,000 and 252,000 shares of common stock, respectively, to a total of 690,800 shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2016, the Company reserved 233,189 shares of common stock available for future issuance under the plans as described above.
The 2013 Plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, dividend equivalent rights, and other awards, which may be granted singly, in combination, or in tandem. The 2013 Plan is administered by the Company’s compensation committee.
In 2004, Section 409A was added to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) to regulate all types of deferred compensation. Certain performance awards, stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, and certain types of restricted stock are subject to Section 409A of the Code.
1)Pursuant to the current Section 102 of the Israeli Tax Ordinance, which came into effect on January 1, 2003, options may be granted through a trustee (i.e., Approved 102 Options) or not through a trustee (i.e., Unapproved 102 Options). As a result of an election made by the Company under Section 102 of the Income Tax Ordinance, the Company will not be allowed to claim as an expense for tax purposes in Israel the amounts credited to the employee as capital gains to the grantees, although it will generally be entitled to do so in respect of the salary income component (if any) of such awards when the related tax is paid by the employee.

 

 F-28

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

2)During the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015,2018, the Company granteddid not grant any stock options to the CEO, employees and directors.
3)During the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company granted to the then CEO, employees and directors to purchase a total of 328,69870,582 and 8,599 shares of the Company’s common0 restricted stock,respectively. The options have exercise prices ranging from $1.86-$12.5 and $42.5-$207.5 per share, respectively, which were the fair market value of the company’s common stock on the date of each respective grant. The fair value of these restricted stock granted in the above options, using the Black-Scholes and the Monte-Carlo option pricing models,year ended December 31, 2019 was approximately $1,023,000 and $660,000, respectively. Of$668,000. The 70,582 restricted stock granted during the 328,698 stock options granted in 2016, 161,025 options are subject to a three-year vesting period with one-third of such awards vesting each year 32,000 options are subject to a two-year vesting period with one-half of such awards vesting each year, 83,941 options are subject to a one-year vesting period, 28,331 options are fully vested as of their grant date and the remaining options are subject to certain market and performance conditions. Of the 8,599 stock options granted in 2015, 4,320 options are fully vested as of their grant date and the remaining optionsended December 31, 2019 are subject to a three-year vesting period, with one-third of such awards vesting each year.

3)During the year ended
4)On December 31, 2016 and 2015,16, 2019, the Company granted to the then CEO, employees and directors 129,825 and 7,866in connection with his separation agreement, an equity award of 165,000 restricted sharesstock units, all of the Company’s common stock, respectively.which were fully vested upon grant. The fair value of these restricted sharesstock units was approximately $545,000 and $1,157,000. Of the 129,825 restricted shares granted during the year ended December 31, 2016, 70,500 restricted shares are subject to a one-year vesting period and the remaining restricted shares are subject to a three-year vesting period, with one-third of such awards vesting each year. Of the 7,866 restricted shares granted during the year ended December 31, 2015, 1,732 restricted shares are subject to a one-year vesting period, 370 restricted shares are fully vested as of their grant date and are subject to a 6 month lock up period, 2,553 restricted shares are fully vested as of their grant date, 1,330 restricted shares are subject to a six-month vesting period and 1,881 restricted shares are subject to a three-year vesting period, with one-third of such awards vesting each year.$141,900.

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 

4)The following table summarizes information about warrants and share options to employees:

  Year ended December 31 
  2016  2015 
  Number of warrants and options  

Weighted

average

exercise price

  Number of warrants and options  

Weighted

average

exercise price

 
Outstanding - beginning of period  28,548  $752.5   21,463  $1002.5 
Granted  328,698   4.57   8,599   132.5 
Forfeited  (20,861)  689.47   (1,514)  767 
Exercised  (153)  -         
Outstanding -end of period  336,232  $25.48   28,548  $752.5 
Exercisable at the end of the period  51,275  $145.35   13,792  $1,159.25 

5)The following table summarizes information about warrants and sharestock options granted to non-employees:employees:

 

 Year ended December 31  Year ended December 31 
 2016  2015  2019  2018 
 Number of warrants and options  

Weighted

average

exercise price

  Number of warrants and options  

Weighted

average

exercise price

  Number of options  

Weighted

average

exercise price

  Number of options  

Weighted

average

exercise price

 
Outstanding - beginning of period  5,372  $1,134   5,597  $1,120   164  $184,656   220  $247,835 
Granted  -   -   -   -   -             
Forfeited  (3,722)  1,278.55   (225)  766.75   (4)  4,423   (56)  432,861 
Exercised  (147)  -           -   -         
Outstanding - end of period  1,503  $890.42   5,372  $1,134.25 
Outstanding -end of period  160  $189,162   164  $184,656 
Exercisable at the end of the period  1,485  $886.28   5,356  $1,134   160  $189,162   139  $216,819 

 

F-30F-27
 

 

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 

NOTE 8 – EQUITY (continued):

6)The following table summarizes information about stock options granted to non-employees:

  Year ended December 31 
  2019  2018 
  Number of options  Weighted average exercise price  Number of options  Weighted average exercise price 
Outstanding - beginning of period  20  $1,693,174   24  $1,542,073 
Granted  -   -   -   - 
Forfeited  (4)  1,617,338   (4)  786,556 
Exercised  -   -   -   - 
Outstanding - end of period  16   1,711,975   20  $1,693,174 
Exercisable at the end of the period  16   1,711,975   18  $1,689,533 

7)The following table summarizes information about restricted sharesstock granted to employees:

 

 Year ended December 31  Year ended December 31 
 2016  2015  2019  2018 
 Number of restricted shares  Number of restricted stock 
Outstanding - beginning of period  5,889   4,103   19   48 
Reverse Split Adjustments  (127)  0 
Granted  129,825   7,866   70,582   0 
Forfeited  (1,266)  (406)  (838)  (8)
Vested  (3,999)  (5,674)  (5)  (21)
Outstanding - end of period  130,449   5,889   69,631   19 

 

7)The table above does not include the Restricted Stock Unit granted by the Company to the then CEO, in connection with his separation agreement. See Note 8b(4).

8)The following table provides additional information about all warrants and options outstanding and exercisable:

 

  Outstanding as of December 31, 2016 
Exercise
price
 Warrants and options outstanding  Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)  Warrants and options exercisable 
$0-$1.86  45,823   9.76   382 
$3.04-$3.25  143,400   4.68   - 
$4.75-$12.5  139,857   9.51   43,932 
$42.5-$207.5  3,405   7.43   3,280 
$557.5-$2,100  5,250   3.89   5,165 
   337,735   7.39   52,760 
  Outstanding as of December 31, 2019 

Exercise

price

 Options outstanding  Weighted average remaining contractual life (years)  Options exercisable 
$0  2   2.40   2 
$175 and above  174   5.89   174 
   176   5.85   176 

 

The weighted average of the remaining contractual life of total vested and exercisable warrants and options as of December 31, 20162019 was 8.705.85 years.

 

The aggregate intrinsic value of the total exercisable warrants and options as of December 31, 20162019 was approximately $955.$2.

 

The weighted average fair value of warrants and options granted was approximately $3.11 and $77.75 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The weighted average fair value of warrants and options granted was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

8)The following table sets forth the assumptions that were used in determining the fair value of options granted to employees for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:F-28

  Year ended December 31 
  2016  2015 
Expected life 5-6.5 years  5-6.5 years 
Risk-free interest rates  1.01%-2.06%   1.41%-1.71% 
Volatility  85.8%-91.03%   62.68%-71.12% 
Dividend yield  0%  0%

 

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 8 – EQUITY (continued):

 

The Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. Accordingly, as to ordinary course options granted, the expected term was determined using the simplified method, which takes into consideration the option’s contractual life and the vesting periods (for non-employees, the expected term is equal to the option’s contractual life).

 

Until December 31, 2015, the Company estimated forfeitures based on its employment termination history. Beginning January 1, 2016, the Company adopted ASU 2016-09 and elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. The annual risk-free rates are based on the yield rates of zero coupon non-index linked U.S. Federal Reserve treasury bonds as both the exercise price and the share price are in dollar terms. The Company’s expected volatility is derived from a blended volatility, based on its historical data and that of a peer group of public companies.data.

 

9)As of December 31, 2016,2019, the total unrecognized compensation cost on employee and non-employee stock options and restricted shares,stock, related to unvested stock-based compensation, amounted to approximately $1 million.$126 thousand. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.830.91 years. This expected cost does not include the impact of any future stock-based compensation awards.

10)The following table summarizes the allocation of total share-based compensation expense in the consolidated statements of operations:

 

 Year ended December 31  Year ended December 31 
 2016  2015  2019 2018 
 ($ in thousands)  ($ in thousands) 
Cost of revenues $1  $8  $14  $4 
Research and development  182   716  10 - 
Sales and marketing  (85)  179  29 6 
General and administrative  880   2,145   272  60 
Restructuring and impairment  -   59 
 $978  $3,107  $325 $70 

F-29

 

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 

NOTE 119 - TAXES ON INCOME:

 

a.Tax laws applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries

 

Taxation in the United States

 

InspireMD, Inc. is taxed under U.S. tax laws. Accordingly, the applicable federal corporate tax rate in 2019 is 34%21%. State tax may also apply.

 

Taxation in Israel

 

In January 2016, the Law for the Amendment of the Income Tax Ordinance (No. 216) was published, enacting a reduction ofThe corporate tax rate was 23% in 20162019 and thereafter, from 26.5% to 25%.

In December 2016, the Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments for Implementing the Economic Policy for the 2017 and 2018 Budget Year), 2016 was published, introducing a gradual reduction in corporate tax rate from 25% to 23%. However, the law also included a temporary provision setting the corporate tax rate in 2017 at 24%. As a result, the corporate tax rate will be 24% in 2017 and 23% in 2018 and thereafter.

 

Taxation in Germany

 

InspireMD GmbH is taxed according to the tax laws in Germany. Accordingly, the applicable tax rates are corporate tax rate of 15.825% and trade tax rate of 17.15%.

 

Taxation in UK

InspireMD UK is taxed according to the tax laws in the UK. Accordingly, the applicable tax rate is a corporate tax rate of 20%. The Company closed InspireMD UK in 2015.

b.Tax benefits under the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959 (the “Law”):

 

InspireMD Ltd. has been granted a “Beneficiary Enterprises” status under the Investment Law including Amendment No. 60 thereof, which became effective in April 2005. The tax benefits derived from any such Beneficiary Enterprise relate only to taxable profits attributable to the specific program of investment to which the status was granted.

 

The main benefit, to which InspireMD Ltd. is entitled, conditional upon the fulfilling of certain conditions stipulated by the above law, is a two-year exemption and five to eight years of a reduced tax rate of 10% to 25%23% from tax on income derived from beneficiary activities in facilities in Israel. The two-year exemption starts only when the Company starts to pay taxes after using all carryforward tax offsetting losses. The tax benefit period is twelve years from the year of election, which means that after a year of election, the two-year exemption and eight years of reduced tax rate can only be used within the next twelve years. The Company elected the year 2007, as a year of election and 2011 as an additional year of election.

F-30

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

NOTE 9 - TAXES ON INCOME (continued):

 

In the event of a distribution of tax-exempt income attributable to “Beneficiary Enterprises” as a cash dividend, the Company will be required to pay tax at a rate of 10% to 25%23% on the amount distributed, subject to certain conditions. In addition, dividends originating from income attributable to the “Beneficiary Enterprises” will be subject to a 15%20% withholding tax.

 

Should InspireMD Ltd. derive income from sources other than the “Beneficiary Enterprises” during the period of benefits, such income shall be taxable at the regular corporate tax rate.

 

1)Conditions for entitlement to the benefits

 

The entitlement to the above benefits is conditional upon InspireMD Ltd. fulfilling the conditions stipulated by the law, regulations published thereunder and the instruments of approval for the specific investments in approved assets. In the event of failure to comply with these conditions, the benefits may be cancelled, and InspireMD Ltd. may be required to refund the amount of the benefits, in whole or in part, with the addition of interest.interest and linkage.

 

The Company opted not to apply for Preferred Enterprise status.status (as defined in the Amendment of the Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investments, 1959).

 

c.Carry forward tax losses

 

As of December 31, 2016, InspireMD Ltd.2019, the Company had a net carry forward tax loss of approximately $60$43 million, of which approximately $36 million (arising before January 1, 2018), expires until 2037, and approximately $7 million, which does not expire, but is limited to offset 80% of the net income in the year it is utilized.

Under the U.S. tax laws, for net operating losses (NOLs) arising after December 31, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017 (the “2017 Act”) limits a taxpayer’s ability to utilize NOL carryforwards to 80% of taxable income.

In addition, NOLs arising after 2017 can be carried forward indefinitely, but carryback is generally prohibited. NOLs generated in tax years beginning before January 1, 2018, will not be subject to the foregoing taxable income limitation and will continue to have a two-year carryback and twenty-year carryforward period.

As of December 31, 2019, InspireMD Ltd., an Israeli subsidiary, had a net carry forward tax loss of approximately $82 million. Under Israeli tax laws, the carry forward tax losses can be utilized indefinitely. The Company had a net carry forward tax loss of approximately $33 million. Under U.S. tax laws, the Company’s tax losses can be utilized two years back and twenty years forward. As such the Company’s carry forward tax losses will begin to expire on December 31, 2031.

 

d.Loss before income taxes

 

The components of loss before income taxes are as follows:

 

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31 
 2016  2015  2019  2018 
 ($ in thousands)  ($ in thousands) 
Loss before taxes on income:                
InspireMD, Inc. $(3,640) $(6,131) $(3,687) $(2,884)
Subsidiaries  (4,820)  (9,450)  (6,329)  (4,356)
 $(8,460) $(15,581) $(10,016) $(7,240)

F-31

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 

NOTE 119 - TAXES ON INCOME(continued):

 

Current taxes on income

e.Current taxes on income

 

The main reconciling items between the statutory tax rate of the Company and the effective tax rate are the change in subsidiary tax rates and the change in valuation allowance in respect of tax benefits from carried forward tax losses due to uncertainty of the realization of such tax benefits.

benefits and changes in tax rates following the 2017 Act.

 

The changes in the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 were as follows:

 

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31 
 2016  2015  2019  2018 
 ($ in thousands)  ($ in thousands) 
Balance at the beginning of the year $28,970  $24,655  $27,640  $27,240 
Changes during the year  712   4,315 
Changes during the year:        
Losses during the year (including foreign exchange rate effect)  3,541   400 
Balance at the end of the year $29,682  $28,970  $31,181  $27,640 

 

 F-35

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

e.f.Accounting for Uncertain Tax position

 

The Company has noFollowing is a reconciliation of the total amounts of the Company’s uncertain tax positions as ofduring the year ended December 31, 2016.2019:

  Year ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
  ($ in thousands) 
Balance at beginning of period $28  $28 
Increase in uncertain tax positions because of tax positions taken during the year  16   - 
Balance at end of period $44  $28 

 

A summary of open tax years by major jurisdiction is presented below:

 

Jurisdiction 

Years

U.S. 2013-20162016-2019
Israel 2013-20162015-2019
Germany 2011-20162016-2019
United Kingdom 2014-2015

f.Deferred income tax:

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
  ($ in thousands) 
    
Short-term:        
Allowance for doubtful accounts $64  $74 
Provision for vacation and recreation pay  34   105 
   98   179 
Long-term:        
R&D expenses  459   1,326 
Share-based compensation  4,027   3,737 
Carry forward tax losses  25,053   23,674 
Accrued severance pay, net  45   54 
   29,584   28,791 
Less-valuation allowance  (29,682)  (28,970)
  $-  $- 

 

F-36F-32
 

 

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 

NOTE 129 - TAXES ON INCOME (continued):

g.Deferred income tax:

  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
  ($ in thousands) 
    
Long-term:        
Allowance for doubtful accounts  -   3 
Allowance for bonus  57   - 
Provision for vacation and recreation pay  35   38 
R&D expenses  589   339 
Operating lease right of use assets  (215)  - 
Operating lease liabilities  233   - 
Share-based compensation  2,596   2,581 
Carry forward tax losses  27,854   24,643 
Accrued severance pay, net  32   36 
   31,181   27,640 
Less-valuation allowance  (31,181)  (27,640)
   -   - 

NOTE 10 - SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION:

 

Balance sheets:

 

a.Accounts receivable:

 

The changes in “Allowance for doubtful accounts” during the years ended December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 are as follows:

 

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
 2016  2015  2019 2018 
 ($ in thousands)  ($ in thousands) 
Balance at beginning of period $346  $337  $72  $72 
Additions during the period  -   72   -   - 
Deductions during the period  -   (49)
Bad debt written-off during the period  (72)  - 
Exchange rate differences  (10)  (14)  -   - 
Balance at end of period $336  $346  $-  $72 

 

b.       Inventories:

b.Inventory:

 

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
  ($ in thousands) 
Finished goods $83  $301 
Work in process  233   307 
Raw materials and supplies  184   145 
  $500  $753 

For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded expenses for slow moving inventory in the amounts of $50,000 and $588,000, respectively.

c.       Accounts payable and accruals-other:

  December 31, 
  2016  2015 
  ($ in thousands) 
Employees and employee institutions $357  $412 
Accrued vacation and recreation pay  137   377 
Accrued clinical trials expenses  467   582 
Provision for sales commissions  56 �� 80 
Accrued expenses  425   552 
Other  5   3 
  $1,447  $2,006 

  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
  ($ in thousands) 
Finished goods $173  $284 
Work in process  81   111 
Raw materials and supplies  982   739 
  $1,236  $1,134 

 

F-37F-33
 

 

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

 

NOTE 1310 - SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION (continued):

c.Accounts payable and accruals-other:

  December 31, 
  2019  2018 
  ($ in thousands) 
Employees and employee institutions $1,238  $828 
Accrued vacation and recreation pay  188   171 
Accrued expenses  604   903 
Provision for sales commissions  -   37 
Current Operating lease liabilities  362   - 
Other  57   27 
  $2,449  $1,966 

NOTE 11 – DISAGGREGATED REVENUE AND ENTITY WIDE DISCLOSURES:

 

Revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the location of the customers. The following is a summary of revenues:

 

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
 2016  2015  2019 2018 
 ($ in thousands)  ($ in thousands) 
Germany $631  $519  $727  $855 
Italy  382   415   686   632 
Belarus  134   226 
Brazil  57   238 
Poland  370   219 
Russia  272   351 
Other  690   912   1,666   1,544 
 $1,894  $2,310  $3,721  $3,601 

 

By product:

 

  Year ended December 31, 
  2016  2015 
  ($ in thousands) 
CGuard $1,147  $703 
MGuard*  747   1,607 
  $1,894  $2,310 

*Includes revenue from sales of both MGuard Prime and MGuard.

  Year ended December 31, 
  2019  2018 
  ($ in thousands) 
CGuard™ EPS $3,265  $2,970 
MGuard Prime™ EPS  456   631 
  $3,721  $3,601 

 

By principal customers:

 

 Year ended December 31,  Year ended December 31, 
 2016  2015  2019 2018 
Customer A  28%  9%  18%  22%
Customer B  13%  7%  10%  10%
Customer C  7%  10%  10%  6%
Customer D  5%  11%  7%  10%

 

All tangible long lived assets are located in Israel.

NOTE 12 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:

On December 9, 2019, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with a new chief executive officer and president. The term of the new chief executive officer’s employment commenced on January 1, 2020. Pursuant to his employment agreement, the Company granted 182,381 restricted stock units and stock options to purchase 60,794 shares of common stock at $1.10 per share.

INSPIREMD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in thousands)

  September 30  December 31 
  2020  2019 
ASSETS        
CURRENT ASSETS:        
Cash and cash equivalents $10,882  $5,514 
Accounts receivable:        
Trade, net  565   823 
Other  332   150 
Prepaid expenses  169   87 
Inventory  1,388   1,236 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS  13,336   7,810 
         
NON-CURRENT ASSETS:        
Property, plant and equipment, net  415   547 
Operating lease right of use assets  1,215   937 
Fund in respect of employee rights upon retirement  643   586 
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS  2,273   2,070 
TOTAL ASSETS $15,609  $9,880 

INSPIREMD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(U.S. dollars in thousands other than share and per share data)

  September 30  December 31 
  2020  2019 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES:        
Accounts payable and accruals:        
Trade  427   646 
Other  2,123   2,449 
Contract liability  19   20 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES  2,569   3,115 
         
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES-        
Operating lease liabilities  917   653 
Liability for employees rights upon retirement  843   729 
         
TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES  1,760   1,382 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES (Note 8)        
TOTAL LIABILITIES  4,329   4,497 
         
EQUITY:        
         
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; 150,000,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019; 36,059,128 and 3,916,134 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively  3   - 
Preferred B shares, par value $0.0001 per share; 500,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019; 17,303 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.  -   - 
Preferred C shares, par value $0.0001 per share; 1,172,000 shares authorized at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019; 2,343 and 34,370 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively  -   - 
Additional paid-in capital  175,600   163,015 
Accumulated deficit  (164,323)  (157,632)
Total equity  11,280   5,383 
Total liabilities and equity $15,609  $9,880 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-36

INSPIREMD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in thousands, except per share data)

  

Three months ended

September 30,

  

Nine months ended

September 30,

 
  2020  2019  2020  2019 
             
REVENUES $980  $939  $2,327  $2,708 
COST OF REVENUES  682   811   1,854   2,211 
GROSS PROFIT  298   128   473   497 
OPERATING EXPENSES:                
Research and development  546   442   1,513   2,432 
Selling and marketing  485   537   1,486   1,791 
General and administrative  1,462   1,146   4,136   3,584 
Total operating expenses  2,493   2,125   7,135   7,807 
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (2,195)  (1,997)  (6,662)  (7,310)
FINANCIAL EXPENSES, net:  (38)  (73)  (29)  (173)
NET LOSS  (2,233)  (2,070)  (6,691)  (7,483)
NET LOSS PER SHARE - basic and diluted $(0.06) $(1.26) $(0.38) $(5.79)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK USED IN COMPUTING NET LOSS PER SHARE - basic and diluted  34,884,285   1,648,302   17,460,184   1,293,321 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

F-37

INSPIREMD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)

 Common stock  Series B
Convertible
Preferred Stock
  Series C
Convertible
Preferred Stock
  Additional paid-in  Accumulated  Total 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  capital  deficit  equity 
                            
BALANCE AT January 1, 2019  768,615    *   17,303   *   61,423   *  $156,355  $(147,592) $8,763 
Net loss                              (7,483)  (7,483)
Issuance of common shares, warrants, pre-funded warrants and exercise of pre-funded warrants, net of $1,177 issuance costs  2,588,828    *                   6,331       6,331 
Conversion of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock to common shares  29,728   *           (24,554)  *            * 
Share-based compensation related to restricted stock and stock options award, net of forfeitures of 837 shares  69,744   *                   285       285 
BALANCE AT September 30, 2019  3,456,915    *   17,303   *   36,869   *  $162,971  $(155,075) $7,896 

* Represents an amount less than $1 thousand

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

  Common stock  Series B
Convertible
Preferred Stock
  Series C
Convertible
Preferred Stock
  Additional paid-in   Accumulated  Total 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  capital  deficit  equity 
                            
BALANCE AT July 1, 2019  1,397,133    *   17,303    *   38,806    *  $158,579  $(153,005) $5,574 
Net loss                       (2,070)  (2,070)
Issuance of common shares, warrants, pre-funded warrants and exercise of pre-funded warrants, net of $710 issuance costs  2,057,444    *                4,285      4,285 
Conversion of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock to common shares  2,480    *         (1,937)   *          * 
Share-based compensation related to restricted stock and stock options award, net of forfeitures of 142 shares  (142)  *               107      107 
BALANCE AT September 30, 2019  3,456,915    *   17,303    *   36,869    *  $162,971  $(155,075) $7,896 
 

* Represents an amount less than $1 thousand

  Common stock  Series B
Convertible
Preferred Stock
  Series C
Convertible
Preferred Stock
  Additional paid-in  Accumulated  Total 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  capital  deficit  equity 
                            
BALANCE AT January 1, 2020  3,916,134   *   17,303   *   34,370   *  $163,015  $(157,632) $5,383 
Net loss                              (6,691)  (6,691)
Exercise of pre-funded warrants  14,856,400   2                   16       18 
                                     
Settlement of restricted stock units in shares of common stock  165,000   *                           * 
Issuance of common shares, including at the market offering net of $945 issuance costs  11,562,202   1                   10,808       10,809 
Exercise of Warrants F  2,866,600   *                   1,418       1,418 
Exercise of Unit Purchase Option  253,587   *                   82       82 
Conversion of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock to common shares  372,173   *           (32,027)  *           * 
Share-based compensation related to restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options award, net of forfeitures of 41,484 shares  2,067,032   *                   261       261 
BALANCE AT September 30, 2020  36,059,128   3   17,303   *   2,343   *  $175,600  $(164,323) $11,280 

* Represents an amount less than $1 thousand

  Common stock  

Series B

Convertible

Preferred Stock

  

Series C

Convertible

Preferred Stock

  Additional paid-in  Accumulated  Total 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  capital  deficit  equity 
                            
BALANCE AT July 1, 2020  33,358,994   3   17,303   *   2,343   *  $175,301  $(162,090) $13,214 
Net loss                              (2,233)  (2,233)
Issuance of common shares at the market offering, net of $110 issuance costs  593,102   *                   158       158 
                                     
Share-based compensation related to restricted stock and stock options award, net of forfeitures of 1,484 shares  2,107,032   *                   141       141 
BALANCE AT September 30, 2020  36,059,128   3   17,303   *   2,343   *  $175,600  $(164,323) $11,280 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

INSPIREMD, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(U.S. dollars in thousands)

  Nine months ended
September 30
 
  2020  2019 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
Net loss $(6,691) $(7,483)
Adjustments required to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation  122   114 
Loss from sale of property, plant and equipment  14   - 
Change in liability for employees rights upon retirement  114   99 
Financial income and interest paid  (4)  (1)
Change in right of use asset and leasing liability  (19)  76 
Share-based compensation expenses  261   285 
Changes in operating asset and liability items:        
Increase in prepaid expenses  (82)  (74)
Decrease (Increase) in trade receivables  258   (80)
Increase in other receivables  (160)  (82)
Increase in inventory  (152)  (149)
Decrease in trade payables  (219)  (242)
Decrease  in other payables and contract liability  (323)  (705)
Net cash used in operating activities  (6,881)  (8,242)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Purchase of property, plant and equipment  (26)  (231)
Amounts (withdrawn) in respect of employee rights upon retirement, net  (57)  (87)
Net cash used in investing activities  (83)  (318)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Proceeds from issuance of shares and warrants and exercise of Pre-Funded Warrants and unit purchase option, net of $945 and $467 issuance costs, respectively  12,327   6,331 
Net cash provided by financing activities  12,327   6,331 
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  5   (1)
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  5,368   (2,230)
BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF THE PERIOD  5,514   9,384 
BALANCE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF THE PERIOD $10,882  $7,154 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
Sale of Fixed Asset (non-cash)  22     

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

INSPIREMD, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

a.General
InspireMD, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), together with its subsidiaries, is a medical device company focusing on the development and commercialization of its proprietary MicroNet™ stent platform technology for the treatment of complex vascular and coronary disease. MicroNet, a micron mesh sleeve, is wrapped over a stent to provide embolic protection in stenting procedures.
The Company’s carotid product (CGuard™ EPS) combines MicroNet and a self-expandable nitinol stent in a single device to treat carotid artery disease.
The Company’s coronary product combining MicroNet and a bare-metal stent (MGuard Prime™ EPS) is marketed for use in patients with acute coronary syndromes, notably acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) and saphenous vein graft coronary interventions (bypass surgery).
The Company markets its products through distributors in international markets, mainly in Europe.
b.Liquidity
The Company has an accumulated deficit as of September 30, 2020, as well as a history of net losses and negative operating cash flows in recent years. The Company expects to continue incurring losses and negative cash flows from operations until its products (primarily CGuard™ EPS) reach commercial profitability. As a result of these expected losses and negative cash flows from operations, along with the Company’s current cash position, the Company has sufficient resources to fund operations through the third quarter of 2021. Therefore, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Management’s plans include the continued commercialization of the Company’s products and raising capital through the sale of additional equity securities, debt or capital inflows from strategic partnerships. There are no assurances however, that the Company will be successful in obtaining the level of financing needed for its operations. The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant financial market volatility and uncertainty in recent weeks. A continuation or worsening of the levels of market disruption and volatility seen in the recent past could have an adverse effect on our ability to access capital and on the market price of our common stock, and we may not be able to successfully raise capital through the sale of our securities. If the Company is unsuccessful in commercializing its products and raising capital, it may need to reduce activities, curtail or cease operations.
c.COVID-19 Pandemic
During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, in an effort to contain and mitigate the spread of COVID-19, many countries have imposed unprecedented restrictions on travel, quarantines and other public health safety measures. As of the beginning of the second quarter of 2020, we began to experience a significant COVID-19 related impact on our financial condition and results of operations, which we primarily attribute to the postponement of CGuard EPS procedures (non-emergency procedures), as hospitals shifted resources to patients affected by COVID-19. To the best of our knowledge, most European countries in which we operate are reinstating elective procedures, but we do not know when the hospitals will resume to normal pre-pandemic levels with such procedures in light of recent increases in COVID-19 cases in the territories we sell into. We anticipate that the continuation of the pandemic and related restrictions and safety measures would likely result in a continued decline in sales of our products for the upcoming periods.
In response to the significant market volatility and uncertainties relating to COVID-19, the fees and salaries of the Company’s board of directors, management and most of its employees were reduced in order to alleviate corporate operating expenses. Following the closing of an underwritten public offering in June 2020, which provided $10.7 million of net proceeds to the Company, the Company reinstated the fees and salaries of its board of directors, management and employees. As a result of the reduction of those fees and salaries during the second quarter of 2020, the Company’s operating expenses were reduced by approximately $235,000 in the second quarter of 2020.

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state fairly the financial position and results of operations of the Company. These consolidated financial statements and notes thereto are unaudited and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, as found in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2020. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of results that could be expected for the entire fiscal year.

NOTE 3 - EQUITY:

a.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company issued a total of 270,000 shares of its common stock in connection with the exercise of 270,000 Pre-Funded Warrants issued in September 2019. As of September 30, 2020, there are no outstanding Pre-Funded Warrants issued in September 2019.

b.

On June 5, 2020, the Company closed an underwritten public offering of (i) 7,635,800 units (“Units”), with each Unit being comprised of one share of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and one Series F warrant (a “Series F Warrant”) to purchase one share of common stock, and (ii) 14,586,400 pre-funded units (the “Pre-Funded Units”), with each Pre-Funded Unit being comprised of one pre-funded warrant (a “Pre-Funded Warrant”) to purchase one share of common stock and one Series F Warrant. In connection with this public offering, the underwriter exercised its over-allotment option in full and purchased an additional 3,333,300 shares of common stock and 3,333,300 Series F Warrants. The offering price to the public was $0.45 per Unit and $0.449 per Pre-Funded Unit. The net proceeds to the Company from the offering and the exercise of the underwriter’s over-allotment option were approximately $10.7 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and payment of other estimated expenses associated with the offering, but excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of Series F Warrants and the Pre-Funded Warrants sold in the offering.

The Series F Warrants included in the Common Units and the Pre-Funded Units are immediately exercisable at a price of $0.495 per share of common stock, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances, and expire June 2, 2025. The shares of common stock, or Pre-Funded Warrants in the case of the Pre-Funded Units, and the Series F Warrants were offered together, but the securities contained in the Common Units and the Pre-Funded Units were issued separately. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, 2,866,600 Series F Warrants were converted into 2,866,600 shares of common stock. The net proceeds to the Company from exercise of the Series F Warrants were approximately $1.4 million.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company issued a total of 14,586,400 shares of common stock in connection with the exercise of all outstanding Pre-Funded Warrants issued in June 2020.

Pursuant to the full ratchet anti-dilution adjustment provisions in the respective certificate of designation for the Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, the conversion price of the outstanding shares of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock was reduced to $0.45 per share, effective as of the date of the underwriting agreement entered for the June 2020 Offering, and the number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock had increased as follows:
● An aggregate of 1,665,414 additional shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock and as payment of the dividends thereunder in common stock, based on 17,303 shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding as of June 2, 2020.
● An aggregate of 283,285 additional shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock, based on 26,558 shares of Series C Preferred Stock outstanding as of June 2, 2020.
For the purpose of calculating basic net loss per share, the additional shares of common stock that are issuable upon exercise of the Pre-funded Warrants have been included since the shares are issuable for a negligible consideration, as determined by the Company according to ASC 260-10-45-13, and have no vesting or other contingencies associated with them. The Company has also concluded that the series F warrants are classified as equity, since the warrants meet all criteria for equity classification.
c.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, 32,027 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock were converted into 372,173 shares of common stock.

d.During June 2020, the placement agent from the July 2016 Offering exercised its unit purchase option to purchase 1,976 units and received 1,976 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and 5 Series A warrants to purchase common stock. The placement agent subsequently converted its Series B Convertible Preferred Stock and received an aggregate of 253,587 shares of common stock. The Company received $81,510 from the placement agent for the exercise of the unit purchase option. As of September 30, 2020, there are no unit purchase options issued in July 2016.
e.During the three months ended September 30, 2020, the Company sold 593,102 shares of its common stock pursuant to its at-the-market (ATM) issuance sales agreement with MLV & Co. LLC. These sales resulted in net proceeds to the Company of approximately $158 thousand.
f.

On August 31, 2020 the Company granted to employees and directors options to purchase a total of 1,094,594 shares of the Company’s common stock. The options have an exercise prices of $0.39 per share, which was the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. The options are subject to a three-year vesting period, with one-third of such awards vesting each year.

In calculating the fair value of the above options the Company used the following assumptions: dividend yield of 0% and expected term of 5.5-6.5 years; expected volatility of 127.71%-136.66%; and risk-free interest rate of 0.32%-0.42%.

The fair value of the above options, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, was approximately $382 thousand.  

g.

On August 31, 2020, the Company granted 2,108,516 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock to employees and directors. The shares are subject to a three-year vesting period, with one-third of such awards vesting each year.

The fair value of the above restricted shares was approximately $822 thousand.

h.

On August 31, 2020, the Company granted 1,175,287 restricted share units of the Company’s common stock to the chief executive officer. The shares are subject to a three-year vesting period, with one-third of such awards vesting each year.

The fair value of the above restricted shares was approximately $458 thousand

i.As of September 30, 2020, the number of preferred shares and the amount each class is convertible into is below:

  Number of
Preferred Stock
  Number of
underlying
Common stock
 
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock  17,303   2,220,552*
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock  2,343   33,322 
Total      2,253,874 

* Including the shares of common stock the holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive as cumulative dividends at the rate per share of 15% per annum of the stated value for five years, payable in cash or common stock, at the Company’s discretion, but excluding effect of future conversion price adjustment, if any.

As of September 30, 2020, the Company has outstanding warrants to purchase an aggregate of 26,705,502 shares of common stock as follows:

  Number of
underlying
Common
stock
  Weighted
average
exercise price
 
Series A Warrants  1,107  $8,750.00 
Series B Warrants  2,448  $3,500.00 
Series D Warrants  766,698  $15.00 
Series E Warrants  2,972,221  $1.80 
Series F Warrants  22,688,900  $0.50 
Underwriter Warrants  274,029  $0.50 
Other warrants  99  $21,993.00 
         
Total Warrants  26,705,502  $1.82 

As of September 30, 2020, the Company had 155,000,000 authorized shares of capital stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of which 150,000,000 are shares of common stock and 5,000,000 are shares of “blank check” preferred stock.

In January 2020, the Company granted its new chief executive officer and president 182,381 restricted stock units and stock options to purchase 60,794 shares of common stock at $1.10 per share. The restricted stock units and options are subject to a three-year vesting period, with one-third of such awards vesting each year.  

The fair value of the restricted stock units was approximately $0.2 million.

NOTE 4- NET LOSS PER SHARE:

Basic and diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The calculation of diluted net loss per share excludes potential share issuances of common stock upon the exercise of share options, warrants, and restricted stocks as the effect is anti-dilutive.

The total number of shares of common stock related to outstanding options, warrants, restricted stock, restricted stock units and Series C Preferred Stock excluded from the calculations of diluted loss per share were 31,378,762 for the nine and three month period ended September 30, 2020.

The total number of shares of common stock related to outstanding options, warrants, restricted stock, Series C Preferred Stock excluded from the calculations of diluted loss per share were 5,001,451 for the nine and three month period ended September 30, 2019.

NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT:

Fair value of financial instruments

The carrying amounts of financial instruments included in working capital approximate their fair value either because these amounts are presented at fair value or due to the relatively short-term maturities of such instruments.

As of September 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, allowance for doubtful accounts was $0.

NOTE 6 - INVENTORY:

  September 30,  December 31, 
  2020  2019 
  ($ in thousands) 
Finished goods $306  $173 
Work in process  290   81 
Raw materials and supplies  792   982 
  $1,388  $1,236 

NOTE 7 - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUALS - OTHER:

  September 30,  December 31, 
  2020  2019 
  ($ in thousands) 
Employees and employee institutions  720   1,238 
Accrued vacation and recreation pay  237   188 
Accrued expenses  761   604 
Current Operating lease liabilities  357   362 
Other  49   57 
  $2,124  $2,449 

NOTE 8 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES:

a.Lease Agreements

1)

The Company’s Israeli subsidiary has a lease agreement for a facility in Israel, which expires on December 31, 2020 with an option to extend the agreement for two additional years until December 31, 2022 under the terms stipulated in the agreement (the Option Period). The Company’s Israeli subsidiary entered into an amendment to the lease agreement to exercise the option to extend the agreement by two years until December 31, 2022 and to add an additional option for two additional years until December 31, 2024 under the terms stipulated in the agreement.

The amendment to the lease agreement and the new Option Period was taken in consideration when calculating the operating lease right of use assets and liabilities since it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise the option.

2)The Company leases its motor vehicles under operating lease agreements.

b.Litigation:

i.In July 2019, a former distributor filed a suit seeking damages from the Company’s subsidiary for pre-paid goods subject to the voluntary field action (from April 2014) amounting to €1,830,000 (which is approximately $2.0 million), or alternatively €1,024,000 (which is approximately $1.2 million). After considering the views of its legal counsel as well as other factors, the Company’s management believes that there is a reasonably possible likelihood of a loss from any related future proceedings would range from a minimal amount up to €1,830,000.
ii.On July 28, 2020, we entered into a settlement agreement and release with the prior underwriter, under which it provided us a final, unconditional release from any further obligations arising out of or related to the engagement agreements, underwriting agreements and placement agency agreements which we had been party to with it and with respect to any services which it had provided to us. We, in turn, provided the prior underwriter a final, unconditional release from any further obligations arising out of or related to the prior agreements and services.
As consideration for the final release provided to us, we paid to the prior underwriter $400,000 in cash and reduced, to $0.495, the exercise price per share of warrants to purchase 274,029 shares of our common stock that had been issued by us to the prior underwriter in various offerings that took place between March 2018 and September 2019. That reduced exercise price represents the exercise price for the Series F Warrants that we issued in our June 2020 public offering. The warrants that were repriced had existing exercise prices per share ranging from $187.50 to $2.25 and a weighted average exercise price per share of $7.32. All other terms of those warrants will remain unchanged. The related increase in expenses of $400,000 was recorded to “General and Administrative expense” within the Consolidated Statements of Operations
iii.

In July 2020, a former senior employee of InspireMD GmbH filed a statement of claim at the Munich Labor Court, seeking confirmation of the court that the notice of termination is not effective. The Company’s management, after considering the views of its legal counsel as well as other factors, is of the opinion that a loss to the Company is neither probable nor in an amount or range of loss that is estimable. 

NOTE 9 - DISAGGREGATED REVENUE AND ENTITY WIDE DISCLOSURES:

Revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the location of the customers. The following is a summary of revenues:

  Three months ended
September 30,
  Nine months ended
September 30,
 
  2020  2019  2020  2019 
  ($ in thousands) 
             
Germany $292  $189  $551  $513 
Italy  185   211   433   550 
Poland  63   90   184   277 
Russia  -   100   116   129 
Other  440   349   1,043   1,239 
  $980  $939  $2,327  $2,708 

By product:

  Three months ended
September 30,
  Nine months ended
September 30,
 
  2020  2019  2020  2019 
  ($ in thousands) 
    
CGuard $833  $852  $2,075  $2,344 
MGuard  147   87   252   364 
  $980  $939  $2,327  $2,708 

By principal customers:

  Three months ended
September 30,
  Nine months ended
September 30,
 
  2020  2019  2020  2019 
Customer A  27%  17%  22%  16%
Customer B  10%  11%  8%  12%
Customer C  9%  12%  11%  8%
Customer D  6%  10%  8%  10%
Customer E  -   11%  5%  5%

All tangible long lived assets are located in Israel.

             19,677,292 Units (each Unit contains One Share of Common Stock and One Series G Warrant to purchase One-Half of One Share of Common Stock)

19,677,292 Pre-funded Units (each Pre-funded Unit contains One Pre-funded Warrant to Purchase One Share of Common Stock and One Series G Warrant to purchase One-Half of One Share of Common Stock)

             , 2021

PROSPECTUS

A.G.P.

PART II

 

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

 

Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.

 

The following table sets forth the estimated costs and expenses, other than placement agent fees and expenses payable by usthe registrant expected to be incurred in connection with the saleissuance and distribution of the securities being registered.registered hereby (other than placement agent fees). All amountsof such expenses are estimates, except for the Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) filing fee and the FINRA filinglisting fee.

 

Securities and Exchange Commission Registration Fee $2,879.39 
FINRA Filing Fee $* 
Accounting Fees and Expenses $* 
Legal Fees and Expenses $* 
Transfer Agent and Registrar Fees and Expenses $* 
Printing and Engraving Expenses $* 
Miscellaneous Fees and Expenses $* 
Total $* 

*To be completed by an amendment.

Securities and Exchange Commission Registration Fee$3,082 
FINRA Filing Fee$2,225 
Accounting Fees and Expenses$35,000 
Legal Fees and Expenses$215,000 
Transfer Agent and Registrar Fees and Expenses$5,000 
Printing and Engraving Expenses$
Miscellaneous Fees and Expenses$6,693 
Total$267,000 

 

Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers.

 

Section 145 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware provides, in general, that a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, as we are, may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding (other than a derivative action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe such person’s conduct was unlawful. In the case of a derivative action, a Delaware corporation may indemnify any such person against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit if such person acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification will be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person will have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or any other court in which such action was brought determines such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses.

 

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors, officers, employees and agents to the extent and in the manner permitted by the provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as amended from time to time, subject to any permissible expansion or limitation of such indemnification, as may be set forth in any stockholders’ or directors’ resolution or by contract. Any repeal or modification of these provisions approved by our stockholders will be prospective only and will not adversely affect any limitation on the liability of any of our directors or officers existing as of the time of such repeal or modification.

 

We are also permitted to apply for insurance on behalf of any director, officer, employee or other agent for liability arising out of his actions, whether or not the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware would permit indemnification.

 

We are also permitted to apply for insurance on behalf of any director, officer, employee or other agent for liability arising out of his actions, whether or not the DGCL would permit indemnification.

II-1
 

 

Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.Securities

 

On February 26, 2018, we and the Series D Investor entered into a waiver agreement (the “Waiver Agreement”) which provided that (i) the Series D Exchange Right would not be applicable to a subsequent financing consisting solely of shares of common stock or units consisting of common stock and common stock purchase warrants publicly registered on Form S-3 for gross proceeds to us of up to $7,000,000, to be consummated by not later than March 21, 2016,9, 2018 (the “March Offering”), such that no share of Series D Preferred Stock will be exchanged for securities being offered in the March Offering, (ii) we soldshall reduce the conversion price of the Series D Preferred Stock to certain of our officers and directors 41,323the lowest effective price per share at which shares of our common stock and(or exercise price, if lower, of any warrants sold in the March Offering) are sold in the March Offering, (iii) instead of using 15% of the proceeds from the March Offering to purchase 20,663redeem shares of our common stock inSeries C Preferred Stock held by the Series D Investor, we shall use 15% of the proceeds from the March Offering to redeem a private placement. The common stock was soldportion of the outstanding shares of Series D Preferred Stock held by the Series D Investor at a price of $14.75 per share and each purchaser receivedpurchase price equal to the stated value of the Series D Preferred Stock, (iv) in the event that we issue any warrants in the March Offering as part of a warrant to purchase one half of one shareunit consisting of common stock forand such subsequent financing warrants, then each shareSeries D Purchaser shall receive, solely with respect to its Series D Preferred Stock outstanding immediately prior to the redemption required pursuant to (iii), the same number of common stock that it purchasedsubsequent financing warrants as participants in the private placement. The warrants are exercisable immediatelyMarch Offering as if such Series D Purchaser’s original subscription amount for the Series D Preferred Stock was its subscription amount in the March Offering, and have(v) we shall file a term of exercise of 5 years fromregistration statement with the date of issuanceSecurities and an exercise price of $14.75. We received gross proceeds from the private placement of approximately $0.6 million, before deducting placement agent fees and estimated offering expenses payable by us. These securities were not registeredExchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in order to register the resale of the shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of the Series D Preferred Stock and any shares issuable upon exercise of the subsequent financing warrants, if any, issued to the Series D Investor, as soon as practicable following the closing of the March Offering, but in no event later than seven days following such closing and to cause such registration statement to become effective as soon as practical after its filing. The securities issued or issuable to the securities laws of any state, andinvestor pursuant to the Waiver Agreement were offered and sold to accredited investors (as defined by Rule 501 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended)issued in reliance onupon the exemption from the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided byrequirements in Section 4(a)(2) and Regulation D (Rule 506) underof the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 

In connectionOn February 27, 2018, we entered into an underwriting agreement (the “March Underwriting Agreement”) with the private placement, on March 21, 2016, we issuedan underwriter (the “Prior Underwriter”), relating to Dawson James Securities, Inc., the exclusive placement agent in the private placement, warrants to purchase 2,067an underwritten public offering of 20,000 shares of our common stock.stock, par value $0.0001 per share. Pursuant to the March Underwriting Agreement, we, in connection with the offering, agreed to issue to the Prior Underwriter warrants to purchase up to 1,200 shares of common stock, or 6% of the number of shares of common stock sold in the offering. The placement agent’sunderwriter warrants are exercisable at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, duringfollowing the period commencing on September 17, 2016date of issuance and ending onfive years from the date of the execution of the March 16, 2021,Underwriting Agreement, at $18.44a price per share. Theseshare equal to $187.50 (125% of the offering price to the public per share of common stock). The underwriter warrants were not registered underissued and the Securities Actshares of 1933, as amended, orcommon stock underlying the securities laws of any state, and were offered and soldunderwriter warrants will be issued in reliance onupon the exemption from the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided byrequirements in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Dawson James Securities, Inc. was an accredited investor (as defined by Rule 501 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) at the time of the private placement.

 

On June 13, 2016, in connection with an amendment, dated June 13, 2016, to the loan and security agreement between us and Hercules, pursuant to which the parties agreed to a deferral of payment of principal for a four month period beginning May 1, 2016, subject to the satisfaction of certain interest only period extension conditions,March 28, 2018, we entered into a warrantthe second waiver agreement with Hercules, pursuantthe Series D Investor (the “Second Waiver Agreement”), which provided that (i) the Series D Exchange Right would not be applicable to which we issued warrants to purchase 38,691a subsequent financing consisting solely of shares of common stock, at an exercisewhich shall be publicly registered on Form S-3 for gross proceeds to us of up to $5,000,000, to be consummated by not later than April 3, 2018 (the “April 2018 Offering”), such that no share of Series D Preferred Stock would be exchanged for securities being offered in the April Offering (ii) our obligation to use 15% of the proceeds from any subsequent offering of our securities that is not a Qualified Offering to redeem the outstanding shares of the Series C Preferred Stock held by the Series D Investor would not be applicable to the April 2018 Offering, (iii) we shall reduce the conversion price of $4.71. These warrants were not registered under the Securities ActSeries D Preferred Stock to the public offering price of 1933, as amended, or the securities laws of any state, and were offered andour common stock sold in the April 2018 Offering, and (iv) we shall use $300,000 of the proceeds from the April 2018 Offering to redeem outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock held by the Series D Investor at a per share purchase price equal to the stated value of the Series C Preferred Stock. The securities issued or issuable to the investor pursuant to the Second Waiver Agreement were issued in reliance onupon the exemption from the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided byrequirements in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Hercules wasAs of the time of the offering being registered under this Registration Statement on Form S-1, we no longer have any shares of Series D Preferred Stock outstanding.

II-2

On March 28, 2018, we entered into an accredited investor (as defined by Rule 501underwriting agreement (the “April 2018 Underwriting Agreement”) with the Prior Underwriter relating to an underwritten public offering of 57,143 shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. Pursuant to the April 2018 Underwriting Agreement, we, in connection with the offering, agreed to issue to the Prior Underwriter warrants to purchase up to 3,429 shares of common stock, or 6% of the number of shares of common stock sold in the offering. The underwriter warrants are exercisable at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, following the date of issuance and ending five years from the date of the execution of the April 2018 Underwriting Agreement, at a price per share equal to $109.38 (125% of the offering price to the public per share of common stock). The underwriter warrants were issued and the shares of common stock underlying the underwriter warrants will be issued in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

On April 4, 2019, we entered into an underwriting agreement (the “April 2019 Underwriting Agreement”) with the Prior Underwriter, relating to an underwritten public offering of 486,957 shares of our common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. On April 12, 2019, the Prior Underwriter partially exercised its over-allotment option and purchased an additional 12,393 shares of our common stock. Pursuant to the April 2019 Underwriting Agreement, we, in connection with the offering, issued to the Prior Underwriter warrants to purchase up to 34,955 shares of common stock, or 7% of the number of shares of common stock sold in the offering, including the shares issued pursuant to the over-allotment option. The underwriter warrants are exercisable at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part, following the date of issuance and expire on April 4, 2024, at a price per share equal to $6.25 (125% of the offering price to the public per share of common stock). The underwriter warrants were issued and the shares of common stock underlying the underwriter warrants will be issued in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

On September 19, 2019, we entered into an underwriting agreement (the “September 2019 Underwriting Agreement”) with the Prior Underwriter, relating to an underwritten public offering of 539,000 common units comprised of (i) one share of our common stock, and one Series E warrant (collectively, the “Series E Warrants”) to purchase one share of common stock and (ii) 2,238,777 pre-funded units comprised of one pre-funded warrant to purchase one share of common stock and one Series E Warrant. We also granted the Prior Underwriter a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 416,666 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $1.79 per share and/or up to 416,666 additional Series E Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 416,666 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.01 per Series E Warrant, less the underwriting discounts and commissions of $0.1253 per share and $0.0007 per Series E Warrant. The Prior Underwriter partially exercised its option, purchasing an additional 194,444 Series E Warrants to purchase 194,444 shares of common stock. The underwriter warrants were issued and the shares of common stock underlying the underwriter warrants will be issued in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

On June 3, 2020, we entered into an underwriting agreement (the “June 2020 Underwriting Agreement”) with A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners, or A.G.P., relating to an underwritten public offering of 7,635,800 units comprised of (i) one share of our common stock, and one Series F Warrant to purchase one share of common stock, and (ii) 14,586,400 pre-funded units comprised of one pre-funded warrant to purchase one share of common stock and one Series F Warrant. Pursuant to the June 2020 Underwriting Agreement, we also granted A.G.P. a 45-day option to purchase up to an additional 3,333,333 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.45 per share and/or up to 3,333,333 additional Series F Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,333,333 shares of common stock, which A.G.P. exercised in full. The underwriter warrants were issued in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

On October 16, 2020, we consummated a private placement of our securities under a securities purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Dr. Gary S. Roubin pursuant to which we issued and sold to Dr. Roubin 222,223 units (“Units”), at a purchase price of $0.45 per Unit, and for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000. Each Unit consists of: (i) one share of our common stock and (ii) one warrant to purchase one share of our common stock with an exercise price of $0.495, such that, in total, we issued and sold to Dr. Roubin 222,223 shares of common stock and a warrant to purchase 222,223 shares of our common stock. These securities were issued in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements set forth in Section 4(a)(2)of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

On February 3, 2021, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with QIDI Asia Medical Limited, a Hong Kong limited company, pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell 1,341,682 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.6708 per share, and for an aggregate purchase price of $900,000. These securities will be issued in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements set forth in Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) at the time the warrants were offered and sold.amended. The transaction is expected to close this month.

II-3

 

Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

 

(a) Exhibits

Index to Exhibits

 

Exhibit No. Description
   

1.1 1.1**

 Form of Placement AgentUnderwriting Agreement
   
3.1 Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2015)
   
3.2 Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2011)
   
3.3 Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2013)
   
3.4 Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of InspireMD, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 25, 2016)

II-2
   

3.5 Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2016)
   
3.6 Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of InspireMD, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2016)
   

3.7 *

 Form of Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 15, 2017)
3.8Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitation of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 29, 2017)
3.9Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitation of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2017)
3.10Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitation of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 22, 2017)
3.11Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of InspireMD, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 7, 2018)
3.12Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitation of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 5, 2018)
3.13Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of InspireMD, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 28, 2019)
   
4.1 Form of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2013)

II-4
 

4.2 Rights Agreement dated as of October 22, 2013 between InspireMD, Inc. and Action Stock transferTransfer Corporation, as Rights Agent, including exhibits thereto (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2013)
   

4.3 *

 Form of Placement Agent Warrant

4.4 *

Form of Series B Warrant Agent Agreement and Form of Series B Warrant

(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Amendment No.3 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 6, 2017)
4.4**Form of Pre-Funded Warrant
   
4.5** Form of Series CG Warrant Agent Agreement and Form of Series C Warrant
   
5.1 4.6** Form of Underwriter Warrant
5.1**Opinion of Haynes and Boone,McDermott Will & Emery LLP
   
10.1+ Amended and Restated 2011 Umbrella Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 4, 2011)
   
10.2+ Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 6, 2011)
   
10.310.3+ License Agreement, by and between Svelte Medical Systems, Inc. and InspireMD Ltd., dated as of March 19, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26, 2011)
10.4+Employment Agreement, by and between InspireMD Ltd. and Craig Shore, dated as of November 28, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 6, 2011)
   
10.5+10.4+ Form of Indemnity Agreement between InspireMD, Inc. and each of the directors and executive officers thereof (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26, 2011)
   
10.610.5 Agreement by and between InspireMD Ltd. and MeKo Laser Material Processing, dated as of April 15, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26, 2011)
   
10.710.6 Agreement by and between InspireMD Ltd. and Natec Medical Ltd, dated as of September 23, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 26, 2011)
   
10.8+10.7+ Stock Award Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2011, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Sol J. Barer, Ph.D. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 18, 2011)

II-3

10.9+Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated as of November 16, 2011, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Sol J. Barer, Ph.D. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 18, 2011)
10.10Form of April 2012 $1,800.00 Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 6, 2012)
10.11First Amendment to License Agreement, dated October 20, 2012, by and among Svelte Medical Systems, Inc., InspireMD, Inc. and InspireMD Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 23, 2012)
10.12+Second Amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. Amended and Restated 2011 UMBRELLA Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 26, 2012)
10.13+Employment Agreement, dated January 3, 2013, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Alan Milinazzo (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 9, 2013)
10.14Form of $750.00 Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.76 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 9, 2013)
10.15Exchange and Amendment Agreement, dated April 9, 2013, by and among InspireMD, Inc., holders of convertible debentures and holders of $1,800.00 warrants issued in April 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.75 to Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 9, 2013)
10.16Letter Agreement, dated as of April 15, 2013, by and among InspireMD, Inc. and each holder of Senior Secured Convertible Debentures Due April 15, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2013)
10.17Form of Amended $750.00 Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2013)
10.18+First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated April 24, 2013, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Alan Milinazzo (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2013)
10.19Second Amendment to License Agreement, dated August 22, 2013, by and among Svelte Medical Systems, Inc., InspireMD, Inc. and InspireMD Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2013)
10.20Loan and Security Agreement, dated October 23, 2013, by and among InspireMD, Inc., InspireM.D Ltd and Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2013)
10.21Fixed Charge Debenture, dated October 23, 2013, by and among InspireMD, Inc., Inspire M.D Ltd and Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2013)

II-4

10.22Floating Charge Debenture, dated October 23, 2013, by and among InspireMD, Inc., Inspire M.D Ltd and Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2013)
10.23Warrant Agreement, dated October 23, 2013, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2013)
10.24Account Control Agreement, dated October 23, 2013, among InspireMD, Inc., Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. and Bank Leumi USA (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 25, 2013)
10.25+InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 20, 2013)
   
10.26+10.8+ Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated May 5, 2014, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Craig Shore (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2014)
   
10.27+10.9+ First Amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. Amended and Restated 2011 UMBRELLA Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2014)
   
10.28+10.10+ Form of Incentive Stock Option Award Agreement under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014)
   
10.29+10.11+ Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014)

II-5
 

10.12+ 
10.30+Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014)
   
10.31+10.13+ Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.5 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014)
   
10.32+10.14+ Form of Section 3(i) Stock Option Award Agreement under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Israeli) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.6 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014)
   
10.33+10.15+ Form of Section 102 Capital Gain Stock Option Award Agreement under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Israeli) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.7 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014)
   
10.34+10.16+ Form of Section 102 Capital Gain Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Israeli) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.8 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014)
   
10.35+10.17+ Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (European) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.9 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014)
   
10.36+10.18+ Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (European) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.10 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014)

II-5
   

10.37+10.19+ Form of Stock Option Award Agreement outside the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.11 to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5, 2014)
   
10.38+10.20+ Employment Agreement, dated July 14, 2014, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and James J. Barry, Ph.D. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 18, 2014)
10.39Form of $437.50 Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2014)
10.40+Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated January 5, 2015, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Alan Milinazzo (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 6, 2015)
10.41+Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated January 5, 2015, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and James J. Barry, PhD (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 6, 2015)
10.42+First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated January 5, 2015, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Craig Shore (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 6, 2015)
   
10.43+10.21 Amendment Number Two to Employment Agreement, dated February 22, 2015, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and James J. Barry, PhD (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2015)
10.44Form of $137.50$240,625 Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2015)
   
10.45+10.22+ Third Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated June 29, 2015, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Alan Milinazzo (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 6, 2015)
10.46^Distribution Agreement, dated August 5, 2015, by and between Penumbra, Inc. and InspireMD, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2015)
10.47+First Amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2015)
   
10.48+10.23 Offer Letter, between InspireMD, Inc. and Isaac Blech, dated January 16, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 22, 2016)
10.49+Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated January 21, 2016, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Alan Milinazzo (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 22, 2016)
10.50+Option Cancellation and Release Agreement, dated January 26, 2016, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Sol J. Barer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2016)

II-6

10.51+Option Cancellation and Release Agreement, dated January 26, 2016, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and James Barry (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2016)
10.52+Option Cancellation and Release Agreement, dated January 26, 2016, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Michael Berman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2016)
10.53+Option Cancellation and Release Agreement, dated January 26, 2016, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Paul Stuka (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2016)
10.54+Option Cancellation and Release Agreement, dated January 26, 2016, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Campbell Rogers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2016)
10.55+Option Cancellation and Release Agreement, dated January 26, 2016, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and James Loughlin (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2016)
10.56+Option Cancellation and Release Agreement, dated January 26, 2016, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Alan Milinazzo (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2016)
10.57+Option Cancellation and Release Agreement, dated January 26, 2016, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Craig Shore (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2016)
10.58+Third Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 28, 2016, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and James J. Barry, PhD (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.66 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2016)
10.59Form of $14.75$25,812.50 Underwritten Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2016)
   
10.6010.24 Form of $18.44$32,265.63 Underwriter Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2016)
   
10.6110.25 Form of $14.75$25,812.50 Private Placement Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2016)
   
10.6210.26 Form of $18.44$32,265.63 Placement Agent Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2016)
   
10.63+10.27+ Second Amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 25, 2016)
   
10.64+10.28 Fourth Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated June 6, 2016, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and James Barry, Ph.D. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 7, 2016)
10.65Amendment No.1 to Loan and Security Agreement, dated November 19, 2013, by and among InspireMD, Inc., Inspire M.D Ltd and Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2016)
10.66Amendment No.2 to Loan and Security Agreement, dated July 23, 2014, by and among InspireMD, Inc., Inspire M.D Ltd and Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2016)

II-7

10.67

Amendment No.3 to Loan and Security Agreement, dated June 13, 2016, by and among InspireMD, Inc., Inspire M.D Ltd and Hercules Capital, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2016)

10.68

Amendment to Debenture of Fixed Charge, dated June 13, 2016, by and between Inspire M.D Ltd and Hercules Capital, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2016)

10.69

Amendment to Debenture of Floating Charge, dated June 13, 2016, by and between Inspire M.D Ltd and Hercules Capital, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2016)

10.70

Warrant Agreement, dated June 13, 2016, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Hercules Capital, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2016)

   
10.7110.29 

Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated as of June 13, 2016, by and among InspireMD, Inc., several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties to the Loan and Security Agreement, and Hercules Capital, Inc., as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2016)

10.72

Intellectual Property Security Agreement, dated as of June 13, 2016, by and among Inspire M.D LTD, several banks and other financial institutions or entities from time to time parties to the Loan and Security Agreement, and Hercules Capital, Inc., as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2016)

10.73

Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement, dated June 17, 2016, by and among InspireMD, Inc. and the Purchasers identified on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.76 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed on June 17, 2016)

10.74

Placement Agent Unit Purchase Option, dated June 7, 2016, issued to Dawson James Securities, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2016)

II-6
 

10.30 
10.75

Warrant Agent Agreement and Form of Warrant, dated as of July 7, 2016, between InspireMD, Inc. and Action Stock Transfer Corporation, as Warrant Agent (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on July 26, 2016)

   
10.76+10.31+ 

Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated July 25, 2016, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Craig Shore agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2016)

   
10.77+10.32+ 

Third Amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2016)

   
10.78+10.33+ 

EmploymentDirector Offer Letter, between InspireMD, Inc. and Thomas J. Kester, dated September 6, 2016

10.34+First Amendment to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement dated October24,November 16, 2011, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Sol Barer, dated as of June 2, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2017)
10.35+First Amendment to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement dated March 31, 2015, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Sol Barer, dated as of June 2, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2017)
10.36+First Amendment to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement dated June 30, 2015, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Sol Barer, dated as of June 2, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2017)
10.37+First Amendment to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement dated September 30, 2015, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Sol Barer, dated as of June 2, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2017)
10.38+First Amendment to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement dated June 30, 2016, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Agustin GagoSol Barer, dated as of June 2, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2017)
10.39+First Amendment to Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement dated December 7, 2016, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Sol Barer, dated as of June 2, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 2, 2017)
10.40Securities Purchase Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 29, 2017)
10.41Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement, dated February 21, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 21, 2018)
10.42Waiver Agreement, dated February 26, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 26, 2018)
10.43Form of Underwriter Warrant, dated March 1, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 1, 2018)

10.44

Waiver Agreement, dated March 28, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2018)

II-7

10.45Form of Underwriter Warrant, dated April 2, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2018)
10.46Letter Agreement, dated June 28, 2018, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Sabby Healthcare Master Fund, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.67 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, Amendment No. 2, filed with the SEC on June 26, 2018 (File No. 333-225680))
10.47Form of Series D Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, Amendment No. 2, filed with the SEC on June 26, 2018 (File No. 333-225680))
10.48Form of Underwriter Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, Amendment No. 2, filed with the SEC on June 26, 2018 (File No. 333-225680))
10.49+Fourth Amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 27, 2016)

26, 2018)
   
10.79+10.50+ 

Director Offer Letter, betweenFifth Amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. and Thomas J. Kester, dated September 6, 20162013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7910.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 21, 2019)

10.51+Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated March 25, 2019, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Craig Shore (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 28, 2019)
10.52Form of Underwriter Warrant, dated April 8, 2019 and April 12, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 8, 2019)
10.53Form of Series E Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, Amendment No. 1, filed with the SEC on September 13, 2019 (File No. 333-233432))
10.54Form of Underwriter Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, Amendment No. 1, filed with the SEC on September 13, 2019 (File No. 333-233432))
10.55+General Release and Severance Agreement, dated December 9, 2019, by and between the Company and James J. Barry, Ph.D. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 10, 2019)
10.56+First Amendment to General Release and Severance Agreement, dated December 31, 2019, by and between the Company and James J. Barry, Ph.D. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2020)
10.57+First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 31, 2019, by and between the Company and Marvin Slosman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 6, 2020)
10.58+Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, by and between the Company and Marvin Slosman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.60 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 16, 2017)March 9, 2020)
10.59+Restricted Stock Unit Award agreement, by and between the Company and Marvin Slosman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.61 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 9, 2020)
10.60Form of Series F Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, Amendment No. 1, filed with the SEC on June 1, 2020 (File No. 333-238247))

II-8

10.61Form of Pre-Funded Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, Amendment No. 1, filed with the SEC on June 1, 2020 (File No. 333-238247))
10.62Form of Underwriter Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, Amendment No. 1, filed with the SEC on June 1, 2020 (File No. 333-238247))
10.63Sales Agreement, dated July 28, 2020 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on July 28, 2020)
10.64+Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated August 14, 2020, by and between InspireMD, Inc. and Craig Shore (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2020)
10.65+Sixth Amendment to the InspireMD, Inc. 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 31, 2020)
10.66**Form of Investor Agreement
   
21.1 

List of Subsidiaries (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 6, 2011)

   

23.1 *

23.1*
 

Consent of Kesselman & Kesselman, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   
23.2 23.2** 

Consent of Haynes and Boone,McDermott Will & Emery LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1)

   
24.1 

Power of Attorney (included in the signature page)

101.INS**

XBRL Instance Document

   

101*¥

101.SCH**
 

The following materials for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language), (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Statements of Cash Flows, (v) Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Capital Deficiency) and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

*Filed herewith.Taxonomy Schema
  
¥101.CAL**Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed furnished and not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed furnished and not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections.XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF**XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase
101.LAB**XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase
101.PRE**XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase

 

* Filed herewith.

** Previously filed.

+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

^ Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain portions of this exhibit by the Securities and Exchange Commission under a confidential treatment request pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

II-8

 

(b) Financial Statement Schedules

 

No financial statement schedules are provided because the information is not required or is shown either in the financial statements or the notes thereto.

II-9

 

Item 17. Undertakings.

 

a.The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

 

 1.To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

 

 i.To include any prospectus required by section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;
   
 ii.To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement ;statement; and
   
 iii.To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement;

 

provided, however, that paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii) of this section do not apply if the information required to be included in a post-effective amendment by those paragraphs is contained in reports filed with or furnished to the Commission by the registrant pursuant to section 13 or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) that are incorporated by reference in the registration statement, or, as to a registration statement.

 

 2.That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
   
 3.To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.
   
 4.That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities: The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:

 

II-9

 i.Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;
   
 ii.Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;

 iii.The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
   
 iv.Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.

 

b.The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the registrant’s annual report pursuant to section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit plan’s annual report pursuant to section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
  
c.Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
  
d.The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:

 

 1.For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.
   
 2.For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

 

II-10
 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 1 to registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Boston, Commonwealth of MassachusettsTel Aviv, Israel, on February 17 , 2017.3, 2021.

 

 INSPIREMD, INC.
   
 By:/s/ James BarryMarvin Slosman
 Name:James Barry, Ph.D.Marvin Slosman
 Title:Chief Executive Officer

 

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Amendment No. 1 to registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature Title Date
     
/s/ James BarryMarvin Slosman President, Chief Executive Officer and Director 

February 17, 2017

3, 2021

James Barry , Ph.D.

Marvin Slosman
 (principal executive officer)  
     
/s/ Craig Shore Chief Financial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer, Secretary and Treasurer 

February 17, 2017

3, 2021
Craig Shore and Treasurer (principal(principal financial and accounting officer)  
     
/s/ * Chairman of the Board of Directors 

February 17, 2017

3, 2021

Sol J. Barer, Ph.D.

Paul Stuka
    
     
/s/ *Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors

February 17, 2017

Isaac Blech

*

 Director 

February 17, 2017

3, 2021
Michael Berman    
     

/s/ *

 Director 

February 17, 2017

3, 2021
Thomas J. Kester
/s/ *DirectorFebruary 3, 2021
Campbell Rogers, M.D.    
     

/s/ *

 Director 

February 17, 2017

3, 2021
Paul Stuka

*

Director

February 17, 2017

Thomas J. KesterGary Roubin, M.D.    

 

*By:*/s/ James BarryMarvin Slosman 
 James Barry, Ph.D.Marvin Slosman 
 Attorney-in-Fact

By:Attorney-in-Fact*/s/ Craig Shore
Craig Shore
Attorney-in-Fact 

 

II-11