TABLE OF CONTENTS
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 18, 2014May 8, 2015
Registration No. 333-192362333-      ​
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,Washington, D.C. 20549
Amendment No. 5 to
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
SEMLER SCIENTIFIC, INC.
(Exact name of registrantRegistrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware384526-1367393
(State or other jurisdiction of
of incorporation or organization)
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
Number)
2330 NW Everett St.
Portland, OROregon 97210
Telephone: (877) 774-4211
744-4211
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’sRegistrant’s principal executive office)offices)
Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
Semler Scientific, Inc.
2330 NW Everett St.
Portland, OROregon 97210
Telephone: (877) 774-4211
744-4211
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)
Copies to:
Yvan-Claude Pierre, Esq.
Marianne C. Sarrazin, Esq.
Reed Smith LLP
599 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: (212) 521-5400
Facsimile: (212) 521-5450
Brad L. Shiffman, Esq.
Blank Rome LLP
405 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10174
Telephone: (212) 930-9700
Facsimile: (212) 885-5001
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement is declared effective.Statement.
If any of the Securitiessecurities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, check the following box:box.   
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act Registration Statementregistration statement number of the earlier effective Registration Statementregistration statement for the same offering:offering.   
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act Registration Statementregistration statement number of the earlier effective Registration Statementregistration statement for the same offering:offering.   
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act Registration Statementregistration statement number of the earlier effective Registration Statementregistration statement for the same offering:offering.   
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of  “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer    
Accelerated filer                 
Non-accelerated filer      (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company    
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Title of each class of securities to be registered
Proposed maximum
aggregate offering
price(1)
Amount of
registration fee
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share(2)
$10,000,000$1,162
Placement agent’s warrants(3)
Shares of common stock underlying placement agent’s warrants(2)(4)
$875,000$102
Total$10,875,000$1,264
(1)
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act.

(2)
TABLE OF CONTENTSPursuant to Rule 416 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), the securities registered also include such indeterminate amounts and numbers of shares of common stock issuable to cover additional securities that may be offered or issued to prevent dilution resulting from stock splits, stock dividends or similar transactions.
(3)
No fee pursuant to Rule 457(g) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
(4)
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(g) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The proposed maximum aggregate offering price of the placement agent’s warrants is $875,000, which is equal to 125% of  $700,000 (7% of  $10,000,000).
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.


TABLE OF CONTENTS
The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting offersan offer to buy these securities in any jurisdictionstate where the offer or sale is not permitted.
Subject to completion, dated May 8, 2015
Prospectus
[MISSING IMAGE: lg_semlersci.jpg]
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUSSUBJECT TO COMPLETION
DATED FEBRUARY 18, 2014
1,180,000Up to              Shares
of Common Stock
[MISSING IMAGE: t1300651_logo1.jpg]
This is a firm commitment initial publicWe are offering of 1,180,000up to              shares of common stock, by Semler Scientific, Inc. No public market currently exists for our common stock. We anticipate that the initial public offering price of ourpar value $0.001 per share, in this offering.
Our common stock will be between $7.50 and $9.50 per share.
We have applied to listis listed on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “SMLR”. The last reported sale price of our common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “SMLR.” No assurance can be given that our application will be approved.on May 7, 2015 was $3.53 per share.
We are an “emerging growth company” as that term is used in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 and have elected to comply with certain reduced public company disclosure standards.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. You should consider carefully the risks that are describedand uncertainties in the section entitled “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 1110 of this prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined ifpassed on the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus is truthful or complete.prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Per ShareshareTotal
Public offering price
$         $         
Underwriting discounts and commissionsPlacement agent’s fees(1)
$$
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
$$         $         
Proceeds to Semler Scientific, Inc., before expenses$$
(1)
  • The underwriters will receive compensation inIn addition, we have agreed to issue to the underwriting discount.placement agent warrants to purchase up to a number of shares of common stock equal to    % of the aggregate number of shares of common stock sold in this offering and to reimburse the out-of-pocket expenses of the placement agent in connection with this offering up to $100,000. See “Underwriting” beginning on page 73the “Plan of Distribution” section of this prospectus for a description of compensation payable tomore information on the underwriters.
placement agent arrangements.
We have grantedengaged H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (“Wainwright” or the underwriters“placement agent”) to act as our exclusive placement agent in connection with this offering. Wainwright is not purchasing or selling the securities offered by us, and is not required to sell any specific number or dollar amount of securities, but will use its reasonable best efforts to arrange for the sale of the securities offered. We have agreed to pay Wainwright a 45-day optionplacement fee equal to purchase up7% of the aggregate gross proceeds to 177,000 additional sharesus from the sale of common stock solelythe securities in the offering. Wainwright may engage one or more sub-agents or selected dealers in connection with this offering. We estimate total expenses of this offering, excluding the placement agent fees, will be approximately $         . Because there is no minimum offering amount required as a condition to cover over-allotments, if any.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Director, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian, has indicated an interest in purchasing up to 35,400 shares of our common stockclosing in this offering, at the initialactual public offering price. See “Underwriting” for a full description of compensation payableamount, placement agent fees, and proceeds to us, if any, are not presently determinable and may be substantially less than the underwriters.total maximum offering amounts set forth above. This offering will terminate on            , 2015, unless the offering is fully subscribed before that date or we decide to terminate the offering prior to that date. In either event, the offering may be closed without further notice to you. We have not arranged to place the funds from investors in an escrow, trust or similar account.
H.C. Wainwright & Co.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares against payment therefor on or aboutdate of this prospectus is            , 2014.
Aegis Capital Corp
           , 2014

[MISSING IMAGE: t1300651_frontcovr.jpg]

TABLE OF CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus and any free-writing prospectus prepared by or in any free writing prospectus thaton behalf of us or to which we may specifically authorize to be delivered or made available tohave referred you. WeNeither we nor the placement agent have not, and the underwriters have not, authorized anyone to provide you with anyadditional or different information. We are offering to sell, and are seeking offers to buy these securities only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are permitted. The information other than that contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectus we may authorize to be delivered or made available to you. We take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. This prospectus may only be used where it is legal to offer and sell our securities. The information in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of our securities. Our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects may have changed since that date. We are not, and the underwriters are not, making an offer of these securities
No action is being taken in any jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted.
For investors outside the United States: We have not and the underwriters have not done anything that wouldStates to permit thisa public offering of our common stock or warrants or possession or distribution of this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than in the United States.jurisdiction. Persons outside the United States who come into possession of this prospectus mustin jurisdictions outside the United States are required to inform themselves about and to observe any restrictions relatingas to thethis offering of securities and the distribution of this prospectus outside the United States.applicable to that jurisdiction.
We obtained industry and market data used throughout and incorporated by reference into this prospectus through our research, surveys and studies conducted by third parties and industry and general publications. We have not independently verified market and industry data from third-party sources.


PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
Prospectus Summary
The items in the following summary are described in more detail later in this prospectus. This summary highlightsprovides an overview of selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus and does not contain all of the information that you should consider in making your investment decision. Before investingbefore buying our common stock. Therefore, you should read the entire prospectus carefully before deciding to invest in our securities, youcommon stock. Investors should carefully read this entire prospectus, including our financial statements and the related notes andconsider the information set forth under the headings “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysisbeginning on page 10 of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in each case included elsewhere in this prospectus. Unless otherwise stated orIn this prospectus, unless the context otherwise requires, otherwise, references in this prospectus to “Semler Scientific,“the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” or “our”“Semler Scientific” refer to Semler Scientific, Inc.
Semler Scientific, Inc.
Business Overview
We are an emerging medical risk-assessment company. Our mission is to develop, manufacture and market patented products that identify the risk profile of medical patients to allowassist healthcare providers to capture full reimbursement potential for their services.in monitoring patients and evaluating chronic diseases. Our first patented and U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA cleared product, is FloChec®. FloChec™FloChec® is used in the office setting to allow providers to measure arterial blood flow in the extremities and is a useful tool for internists and primary care physicians for whom it was previously impractical to conduct blood flow measurements. FloChecOur product initially received FDA 510(k) clearance in February 2010, we began Beta testing it in the third quarter of 2010, and we began commercially leasing FloChecit in January 2011. In the year ended December 31, 2013March 2015 we had total revenue of $2,274,000 and a net loss of $2,233,000 compared to total revenue of $1,199,000 and a net loss of $2,741,000 in 2012. Our net loss attributable to common stockholders was $2,233,000received FDA 510(k) clearance for the year ended December 31, 2013 comparednext generation version. In March 2015 we also launched our multi-test platform, WellChec™, to $2,826,000perform risk assessments for our customers. We believe the combination of our proprietary risk assessment product, FloChec®2012., and our multi-test service platform, WellChec™, position us to provide valuable health risk assessment tools to our insurance company and physician customers, which in turn permit them to guide patient care and close the gap between the cost of patient care and compensation for providing that care.
Our Product
We currently have only one patented and FDA clearedFDA-cleared product, FloChec®, that we market and lease license to our customers. FloChec® is a four-minute in-office blood flow test. Healthcare providers can use blood flow measurements as part of their examinations of a patient’s vascular condition, including assessments of patients who have vascular disease. The following diagram illustrates the use of FloChec®:
[MISSING IMAGE: t1300651_flocheclr-col.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: t1501090_flochec.jpg]
FloChec® features a sensor clamp that is placed on the toe or finger much like current pulse oximetry devices. Infrared light emitted from the clamp on the dorsal surface of the digit is scattered and reflected by the red blood cells coursing through the area of illumination. Returning light is ‘sensed’ by the sensor. A blood flow waveform is instantaneously constructed by our proprietary software algorithm and displayed on the video monitor. Both index fingers and both large toes are interrogated, which takes about 30 seconds for each. A hardcopy report form is generated that displays four waveforms and the ratio of each leg measurement compared with the arms. Results are classified as Flow Obstruction Borderline Flow Obstruction andor No Flow Obstruction.
We have developed a license model rather than an outright sales model for FloChec®. Our license model pricing is based on data collected on use rates of FloChec® and third-party payment rates to physicians and facilities using our product. The pricing model eliminates the need to make a capital


equipment sale. Consequently, we currently require no down payment, long-term commitment or maintenance contract or fees from our customers. We replace damaged products free of charge in the license model. FloChec® has an expected average lifetime of at least three years. We intend to reevaluate the monthly price periodically in consideration of the revenue generation associated with FloChec®. To date, we roughly estimate that routine office usage of FloChec® has ranged from a few tests per week up to 10 tests per day. We are currently pilot testing a model in which we invoice on a per test basis for use of FloChec®, and recently launched our WellChec™ multi-test platform, where we or our sub-contractor may perform other non-proprietary tests alongside FloChec®.
Our Chairman and co-founder, Dr. Herbert Semler, is an inventor of the technology behind FloChec®. Dr. Semler formed our company in 2007 to further develop, patent and commercialize his idea. We applied for our patent protecting our proprietary technology in 2007 and U.S. Patent No. 7,628,760 was granted in 2009. FloChec® initially received FDA 510(k) clearance in February 2010, and we began Beta testing it in the third quarter of 2010, and began commercially leasing FloChec® in January 2011. In March 2015, we received FDA 510(k) clearance of the next generation version. We have placed our FloChec® product with cardiologists, internists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, podiatrists and family practitioners and four insurance plans among the top 15 plans with the most Medicare Advantage members. Many of the 50 years or older patients under the care of these physicians have cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes, cigarette smoking, high cholesterol or hypertension that lead to the development of peripheral arterial disease, or PAD.
Other Methods
Blood flow is the amount of blood delivered to a given region per unit time, whereas a blood pressure is the force exerted by circulating blood on the walls of arteries. Given a fixed resistance, blood flow and blood pressure are proportional. The traditional ankle brachial index, or ABI, with Doppler test uses a blood pressure cuff to measure the the systolic blood pressure in the lower legs and in the arms. A blood pressure cuff is inflated proximal to the artery in question. Using a Doppler device, the inflation continues until the pulse in the artery ceases. The blood pressure cuff is then slowly deflated. When the artery’s pulse is re-detected through the Doppler probe the pressure in the cuff at that moment indicates the systolic pressure of that artery. The test is repeated on all four extremities. Well-established criteria for the ratio of the blood pressure in a leg compared to the blood pressure in the arms are used to assess the presence or absence of flow obstruction. Generally these tests take 15 minutes to perform and require a vascular technician to be done properly. Like FloChec®, the traditional analog ABI test with Doppler is a non-invasive physiologic measurement that may be abnormal in the presence of peripheral artery disease, or PAD. Alternatively, primary care physicians may palpate the pedal pulses to assess blood flow in the lower extremities. However, pulse palpation is generally not sensitive for the detection of vascular disease. Other options to detect arterial obstructions are imaging systems that use ultrasound, x-ray technology or magnetic resonance to obtain anatomic information about blood vessels in the legs. However, as compared to FloChec®, imaging tests are much more expensive tests that are performed by specialists in special laboratories or offices.
Market Opportunity
In March 2010, President Obama signed into law theThe Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, or collectively, the Health Care Reform Law.Law, was signed in March 2010. This sweeping law is intended to broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of healthcare spending, enhance remedies against fraud and abuse, add new transparency requirements for the healthcare and health insurance industries, impose new taxes and fees on the health industry and impose additional health policy reforms. This legislation includes reforms and reductions that have affected Medicare reimbursements and health insurance coverage for certain services and treatments. The Health Care Reform Law has brought a new way of doing business for providers and health insurance plans. We believe that fee-for-service programs will be reduced in favor of capitated programs that pay a monthly fee per patient.
Fee-for-service is a payment model where services are unbundled and paid for separately. In health care, it gives an incentive for physicians to provide more treatments because payment is dependent on the quantity of care, rather than quality of care. Capitation is a payment arrangement that pays a physician or group of physicians a set amount for each enrolled person assigned to them, per period of time, whether or
2

not that person seeks care. The amount of remuneration is based on the average expected health carehealthcare utilization of that patient, with greater payment for patients with significant medical history. For Medicare Advantage patients, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS pays thea fee per patient.patient, also known as capitation. CMS uses risk adjustment to adjust capitation payments to health plans, either higher or lower, to account for the differences in expected health costs of individuals. Accordingly, under CMS guidelines, risk factor adjustments per patient will provide payment that is higher for sicker patients who have conditions that are codified. Accordingly, there is a financial incentive to identify those Medicare Advantage patients that are sicker, including those that have undiagnosed ailments such as PAD.
The coding system used by CMS for the Medicare Advantage program is a hierarchical condition category, or HCC, diagnostic classification system that begins by classifying over 14,000 diagnosis codes into 805 diagnostic groups, or DXGs. Each code maps to exactly one DXG, which represents a well-specified medical condition, such as DXG 96.01 precerebral or cerebral arterial occlusion with infarction. DXGs are further aggregated into 189 condition categories, or CCs. CCs describe a broader set of similar diseases. Diseases within a CC are related clinically and with respect to cost. An example is CC96 Ischemic or Unspecified Stroke, which includes DXGs 96.01 and 96.02 acute but ill-defined cerebrovascular disease. We believe that quality of care measured by completeness and wellness will induce higher payments per patient. These changes are already in place for the approximately 1416 million participants in the Medicare Advantage program and are expected to expand to more types of insured patients as healthcare reform is deployed.
Undiagnosed vascular disease of the legs has been called a major under-diagnosed health problem in the United States by the National Institute of Health and the Wall Street Journal. We believe vascular disease in leg arteries is undiagnosed in 75% of cases, which is about 12 million Americans. Known as peripheral artery disease, or PAD, this condition is a common and deadly cardiovascular disease that is often undiagnosed. PAD develops when the arteries in the legs become clogged with plaque — fatty deposits — that limit blood flow to the legs. As with clogged arteries in the heart, clogged arteries in the legs place patients at an increased risk of heart attack and stroke. Published studies have shown that persons with PAD are four times more likely to die of heart attack, and two to threetwo-three times more likely to die of stroke. According to a study by P.G. Steg published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, or JAMA, patients with


PAD have a 21% event rate of cardiovascular death, heart attack, stroke or cardiovascular hospitalization within 12 months. The SAGE Group has estimated that as many as 18 million people are affected with PAD in the United States alone and A.T. Hirsch et al. in a JAMA published article further estimate that only 11% have claudication (pain on exertion), a classic symptom of PAD. One can lower the risks associated with PAD if the disease is detected, with early detection providing the greatest benefit.
Many people affected with PAD do not have noticeable symptoms. When symptoms of PAD are present, they often include fatigue, heaviness, cramping or pain in the legs during activity, leg or foot pain, sores, wounds or ulcers on the toes, feet, or legs, which are slow to heal. Persons with PAD may become disabled and not be able to work, and can even lead to amputations. According to the SAGE Group, there are approximately 160,000 amputations due to PAD per year and, according to the National Limb Loss Information Center, an estimated 2 million Americans are amputees.
Risk factors for developing PAD include:

Age (over 50 years)

Race (African-American)

History of smoking

Diabetes

High blood pressure

High blood cholesterol

Personal history of vascular disease, heart attack, or stroke.
3

We believe medical personnel who care for those older than 50 years are the target market for FloChec™.®, along with those insurance plans that have a high number of Medicare Advantage patients. Based on U.S. Census data, we believe there are more than 80 million older Americans who could be evaluated for the presence of PAD.
According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, there are over 200,000 internists, family practitioners and gerontologists in the United States. In addition, based on American Heart Association data, there are over 20,000 cardiologists and 7,500 vascular and cardiovascular surgeons. Also, there are millions of diabetic patients seen routinely by endocrinologists. Many podiatrists who see patients with these problems and orthopedic surgeons may see value in screening patients for circulation issues prior to leg procedures. Neurologists may need a tool to differentiate leg pain from vascular versus neurologic etiology. Nephrologists see patients with kidney disease, who have a higher frequency of PAD. Wound care centers need to know the adequacy of limb perfusion. We expect that each physician will have thousands ofmany patient visits annually from people older than 50 years. While, it is standard practice to ask about symptoms of PAD and to feel for diminished pulses on physical exam, we believe that it is often in the case in busy practices, that the questions go unasked.
In addition, the physical exam of the extremities is generally cursory in the absence of a patient complaint. Given the ease of use and speed of FloChec®, we believe that many doctors will incorporate its use in their practice as a routine annual test.test to measure blood flow in an extremity. It is our intent that FloChec® be incorporated as a tool in the routine physical exam of adult patients by primary care providers in a similar fashion to the use of a thermometer or stethoscope. Providers do not request payment for using a stethoscope during the physical examination. Similarly, we do not expect (or intend) for providers that use our FloChec® to seek such a reimbursement approval. FloChec™FloChec® is not specifically approved under a third-party payor code and we do not track customer requests for reimbursements. Accordingly, our customers may or may not be successful in receiving reimbursement if sought.
Our Business Strategy
Our mission is to develop, manufacture and market patented products and solutions that identify the risk profile of medical patients to allowassist healthcare providers to capture full reimbursement potential for their services, while growing revenuesin monitoring patients and becoming and maintaining profitability.evaluating chronic diseases. We intend to do this by:

  • Capitalizing on opportunities provided by the Health Care Reform Law.capitated payment programs   Under the Health Care Reform Law, for.   For many capitated programs, payment is higher for sicker patients who have conditions that are codified. We believe a provider would prefer to have more remuneration for taking care of a patient. A provider expects to spend less time caring for a healthy patient than for a sicker patient. If payment per month was the same for both types of patients, there wouldcould be a perverse incentivedisincentive for the provider to only want to care for healthymore unhealthy persons. Accordingly, CMS anticipated this situation and pays more per month for “sicker” patients who have chronic conditions that are identified on the medical record through use of an established coding system. This creates a business opportunity in finding low-cost, effective means to identify the conditions, which have been established in coding systems for risk adjustment of payments (higher payments paid to providers and healthcare plans to compensate them for caring for sicker or more risky patients). The more common and more dangerous a condition is, the greater the opportunity for profit. The goal is to provide cost-effective wellness.

  • Targeting customers with patients at risk of developing PAD.PAD.   Healthcare providers use blood flow measurements as part of their assessment of a patient’s vascular condition. Our strategy is to keep marketing our FloChec™ system,FloChec® on a lease-based servicelicense-based model to insurance plans and medical personnel who care for those older than 50, including cardiologists, internists, nephrologists, endocrinologist, podiatrists, and family practitioners. Specifically, we believe there are more than 250,000 physicians and other potential customers in the United States alone, many of thewhom care for patients of whom will be more than 50 years old and at increased risk of developing PAD. Based on U.S. Census data, the evaluable patient population for FloChec™FloChec® is estimated to be more than 80 million patients in the United States annually.

3


  • Expanding the tools available to internists and non-peripheral vascular experts.experts.   Our intention is to provide a tool to internists and non-peripheral vascular experts, for whom it was previously impractical to conduct a blood flow measurement unless in a specialized vascular laboratory. For
4

vascular specialists, FloChec™FloChec® does not require the use of blood pressure cuffs (which should not be used on some breast cancer patients), and measures without blood pressure in obese patients and patients with non-compressible, hard, calcified arteries. Currently, these patients often are unable to be measured satisfactorily with traditional analog ABI devices.

  • Developing additional productsproduct and service offerings that allow healthcare providers to capture the full reimbursement potentialdeliver cost-effective wellness and receive increased compensation for their services.services.   We are currently developingrecently received FDA 510(k) clearance of the next generation of our product, FloChec®, reflecting several new productsupdates and modifications to the original model that were developed in conjunction with our consultant engineering groups thatgroups. We are intendedalso exploring potential new product and service offerings. These product and service offerings are being designed to provide cost-effective wellness solutions for our growing, established customer base. The new products and service offerings under development or tothat may be developed may incorporate some of our current technology or new technology. The goal is to achieve a reputation for outstanding service and sell new cost effectivecost-effective wellness solutions to leverage our gains in the marketplace for such product offerings.
Risks Associated with Our Business
Since inception, we have incurred substantial losses. Our business and our ability to executeimplement our business strategy areis subject to a number ofnumerous risks of whichthat you should be aware of before you decide to buy our common stock. In particular, you should carefully consider the followingmaking an investment decision. These risks which are discusseddescribed more fully in the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 11 ofimmediately following this prospectus.prospectus summary. These risks include, among others:

  • We have incurred significant losses since inception. There is no assurance that we will ever achieve or maintain profitability.
profitability;

  • Our independent registered public accounting firm’s report for the year ended December 31, 2013 includes a “going concern” explanatory paragraph.
  • If we do not successfully implement our business strategy, our business and results of operations will be adversely affected.
affected;

  • We currently only have one product, FloChec®, that we market on a stand-alone basis, or incorporate into our multi-test platform, WellChec™; FloChec™neither FloChec® nor our multi-test platform WellChec™ may not achieve broad market acceptance or be commercially successful.
successful;

  • Physicians may not widely adopt FloChec® unless they determine, based on experience, long-term clinical data and published peer reviewed journal articles, that the use of FloChec™FloChec® provides a safe and effective alternative to other existing ABI devices.
devices along with beneficial economic returns; and

  • If healthcare providers and insurance plans are unable to obtain adequate coverage and reimbursement either for procedures performedpatient care based on health risk assessments done using our product or patient care incorporating the use of our product,multi-test service platform, it is unlikely that our product or risk assessment platform will gain widespread acceptance.
  • Our product, FloChec™, is not specifically approved for reimbursement under any third-party payor codes; if third-party payors refuse to reimburse our customers for their use of our product, it could have a material adverse effect on our business.
  • We have limited experience marketing FloChec™, are dependent on our distribution partner and we may not be able to generate anticipated sales.
  • We face challenges and risk in managing and maintaining our distribution network and the parties who make up that network.
  • To adequately commercialize FloChec™, we may need to increase our sales and marketing network, which will require us to hire, train, retain and supervise employees.
  • We do not require our customers to enter into long-term leases or maintenance contracts for FloChec™ and may therefore lose customers on short notice.
  • We rely heavily upon the talents of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer, the loss of either could severely damage our business.


  • We rely on a sole independent supplier and single facility for the manufacturing of FloChec™. Any delay or disruption in the supply of the product or facility, may negatively impact our operations.
  • Because we operate in an industry with significant product liability risk, and we may not be sufficiently insured against this risk, we may be subject to substantial claims against our product.
  • We may implement a product recall or voluntary market withdrawal due to product defects or product enhancements and modifications, which would significantly increase our costs.
  • If we fail to properly manage our anticipated growth, our business could suffer.
  • Fluctuations in insurance cost and availability could adversely affect our profitability or our risk management profile.
  • We will need to generate significant revenues to become and remain profitable.
  • Our future financial performance will depend in part on the successful improvements and software updates to FloChec™ on a cost-effective basis.
  • We operate in an intensely competitive and rapidly changing business environment, and there is a substantial risk our products could become obsolete or uncompetitive.
  • One of our business strategies is developing additional products that allow healthcare providers to capture the full reimbursement potential for their services. The development of new products involves time and expense and we may never realize the benefits of this investment.
  • Our business is subject to many laws and government regulations governing the manufacture and sale of medical devices, including the FDA’s 510(k) clearance process.
  • The FDA may change its policies, adopt additional regulations, or revise existing regulations, in particular relating to the 510(k) clearance process.
  • Our business is subject to unannounced inspections by FDA to determine our compliance with FDA requirements.
  • Although part of our business strategy is based on certain advantageous new payment provisions enacted under the current government healthcare reform, we also face significant uncertainty in the industry regarding the implementation of the Health Care Reform Law.
  • Our business may be adversely impacted by the recent sequestration signed into law in the United States.
  • The applicable healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations, along with the increased enforcement environment, may lead to an enforcement action targeting us, which could adversely affect our business.
  • Changes in, or interpretations of, tax rules and regulations may adversely affect our effective tax rates.
  • We are an “emerging growth company,” and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make our common stock less attractive to investors.
  • We will incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives and corporate governance practices.
  • We currently have material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to successfully remediate these material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, it could have an adverse effect on our company.
  • Our success largely depends on our ability to obtain and protect the proprietary information on which we base our product.


  • We may need to license intellectual property from third parties, and such licenses may not be available or may not be available on commercially reasonable terms.
  • We may be subject to claims by third parties asserting that our employees or we have misappropriated their intellectual property, or claiming ownership of what we regard as our own intellectual property.
  • Intellectual property litigation could cause us to spend substantial resources and distract our personnel from their normal responsibilities.
  • If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.
  • After this offering, our executive officers, Directors and principal stockholders, if they choose to act together, will continue to have the ability to control all matters submitted to stockholders for approval.
  • Provisions in our corporate charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of our company, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.
  • If you purchase shares of common stock in this offering, you will suffer immediate dilution of your investment.
  • An active trading market for our common stock may not develop.
  • The price of our common stock may be volatile and fluctuate substantially, which could result in substantial losses for purchasers of our common stock in this offering.
  • We have broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds from this offering and may not use them effectively.
  • A significant portion of our total outstanding shares are eligible to be sold into the market in the near future, which could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.
  • Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gain.
Corporate Information
We were foundedincorporated in Portland,the State of Oregon as an Oregon corporationon August 9, 2007, established C-corporation status in August 2007. In March 2012, we converted from an S-Corporation to a C-Corporation and in September 2013, we reincorporated as a Delaware corporation.corporation during 2013. Our principal executive offices are located at 2330 NW Everett St., Portland, OROregon 97210, and our telephone number is (877) 774-4211. Our website address is semlerscientific.com. Information contained in our website does not form part of the prospectus and is intended for informational purposes only.
Implications of BeingWe are an Emerging“Emerging Growth CompanyCompany”
As a company with less than $1.0 billion in revenue during our last fiscal year, weWe qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. For so long asAs an “emerging growth company,” we remain an emerging growth company, we are permittedmay take advantage of specified reduced disclosure and intend to rely on exemptions from specified disclosureother requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. These exemptionsprovisions include:

  • being permitted to provide only two years of audited financial statements in addition to any required unaudited interim financial statements with correspondingly reduced “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” disclosure;

reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements;

omitted compensation discussion and analysis;
  • not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements in the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting;

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  • not being required to comply with anyno requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotationwe solicit non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the auditgolden parachute arrangements; and the financial statements;

  • reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation; and
  • exemptionsexemption from the requirementsauditor attestation requirement in the assessment of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.
our internal control over financial reporting.
We may take advantage of these provisions, including the extended adoption period for new or revised accounting pronouncements described below, for up to five years or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company. We would cease to be an emerging growth company if we have more than $1.0 billion in annual revenues, have more than $700.0 million in market value of our capital stock held by non-affiliates or issue more than $1.0 billion of non-convertible debt over a three-year period. Even if we cease to be an emerging growth company, we may still enjoy reduced reporting obligations insofar as we remain a smaller reporting company. As an emerging growth company, we may chooseintend to take advantage of some, but not all,the reduced disclosure obligations. Section 107 of the available exemptions. We have taken advantage of some reduced reporting burdens in this prospectus. Accordingly, the information contained herein may be different than the information you receive from other public companies in which you hold stock.
In addition, the JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of anthe extended transition period provided in the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This provision allowsIn other words, an emerging growth company can elect to delay the adoption of somecertain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to avail ourselves of this exemption fromto take advantage of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standardsstandards.
We could remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of  (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, which would occur if the market value of our common stock that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three-year period and therefore,(iv) December 31, 2019 (the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of our common equity securities pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act). At this time we willexpect to remain an “emerging growth company” for the foreseeable future.
We also qualify as a “smaller reporting company” and thus we have the advantage of not be subjectbeing required to provide the same new or revised accounting standardslevel of disclosure as otherlarger public companies that are not emerging growth companies. However, if we later decide to opt out of the extended period for adopting new accounting standards, we would need to disclose such decision and it would be irrevocable.


THE OFFERING
Common Stockstock offered by us
1,180,000Up to              shares.
Common stock to be outstanding immediately after this offering
4,602,147 shares. If the underwriter’s over-allotment option is exercised in full, the total number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately after this offering would be 4,779,147.
Over-allotment option
The underwriters have an option for a period of 45 days to purchase up to 177,000 additional shares of our common stock to cover over-allotments, if any.
             shares.
Use of proceeds
We intend to use the net proceeds received fromof this offering to fund research and development activities for our development programs, and for working capital and general corporate purposes. See “Use of Proceeds” on page 28.
Proceeds.”
Risk factors
SeeYou should read the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 1110 and the other information included in of this prospectus for a discussion of factors you shouldto consider carefully consider before investingdeciding to invest in our securities.
Proposed Symbol and Listing
We have applied to listshares of our common stock on The stock.
NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “SMLR.”
Unless we indicate otherwise, all information in this prospectus:“SMLR”
  • is based on 786,750The number of shares of common stock issued andto be outstanding as of January 31, 2014;
  • assumes the automatic conversion into 2,012,152after this offering is based on 4,833,517 shares of common stock outstanding as of allMarch 31, 2015 and excludes as of our outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock effective upon the closing of this offering;
such date:

  • assumes the cashless exercise of outstanding warrants for 228,656 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock and 1,067,210 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock in accordance with their terms, all of which shares of convertible preferred stock will be automatically converted into shares of our common stock, resulting in the issuance of an aggregate of 623,245 shares of common stock effective upon the closing of this offering assuming an offer price of $8.50 per share (which is the mid-point of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus);
  • excludes 288,214705,750 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options outstanding warrants to acquire 25,000 sharesas of our Series A-2 Preferred Stock atMarch 31, 2015, having a purchaseweighted average exercise price of  $2.00$1.52 per share, 16,875 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $4.00 per share, and 246,339 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $4.50 per share, which will become exercisable for common stock rather than convertible preferred stock upon closing of this offering in accordance with their terms;
share;

  • assumes no exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase up to an additional 177,000 50,000 shares of common stock to cover over-allotments, if any; and
issuable upon the exercise of stock options issued after March 31, 2015, having an exercise price of  $3.50 per share;

  • excludes 59,000359,714 shares of common stock underlyingissuable upon the exercise of warrants to be issued to the underwriters in connection with this offering.
outstanding, having a weighted average exercise price of  $5.15 per share;
Our Chief Executive Officer and Director, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian, has indicated an interest in purchasing up to 35,400

332,391 shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2014 stock incentive plan as of March 31, 2015 (after taking into account the grant of 50,000 options after such date).
Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this offering at the initial public offering price. However, because an indicationprospectus reflects or assumes that there has been no exercise of interest is not a binding agreementoutstanding options or commitmentwarrants to purchase the underwriters may determine to sell more, less or no shares in this offering to Dr. Murphy-Chutorian, or Dr. Murphy-Chutorian may determine to purchase more, less or no shares in this offering. See “Underwriting” for a full description of compensation payable to the underwriters.
common stock after March 31, 2015.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA
The following table setstables set forth a summary of our summaryhistorical financial data as of, and for the periods ended on, the dates indicated. The statement of operations data for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 and 2012are derived from our audited financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. OurThe statement of operations data for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and the balance sheet data as of March 31, 2015 are unaudited and are derived from our unaudited financial statements are prepared and presentedrelated notes thereto included elsewhere in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The results indicated below are not necessarily indicative of our future performance.this prospectus. You should read this information togetherthe following tables in conjunction with the sections entitled “Capitalization,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and ourthe financial statements and relatedthe accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. Among other things, those financial statements include more detailed information regarding the basis of presentation for the following financial data. Our historical results for any prior period are not necessarily indicative of our future results.
Statement of Operations Data
For the year ended
December 31,
For the three months ended
March 31,
2014201320152014
(unaudited)
Revenue$3,635$2,274$1,202$837
Operating expenses:
Cost of revenue692469220155
Engineering and product development1,113356309229
Sales and marketing3,7232,2561,228746
General and administrative2,4481,317793497
Total operating expenses7,9764,3982,5501,627
Loss from operations(4,341)(2,124)(1,348)(790)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(175)(108)(24)(26)
Other income (expense)1(1)(1)
Other expense(174)(109)(24)(27)
Net loss$(4,515)$(2,233)$(1,372)$(817)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted$(1.10)$(2.84)$(0.29)$(0.36)
Weighted average number of shares used in computing
basic and diluted loss per share
4,105,754786,7504,763,5732,240,703
   Year Ended December 31, 
   2013  2012 
 
Revenue
  $2,274,000  $1,199,000 
 
Operating expenses:
           
 
Cost of revenue
   469,000   364,000 
 
Engineering and product development
   356,000   277,000 
 
Sales and marketing
   2,256,000   1,718,000 
 
General and administrative
   1,317,000   1,255,000 
 
Total
   4,398,000   3,614,000 
 
Loss from operations
   (2,124,000)   (2,415,000) 
 
Other Income (expenses)
           
 
Interest expense
   (108,000)   (120,000) 
 
Other expense
   (1,000)   (203,000) 
 
Loss before income tax expense
   (2,233,000)   (2,738,000) 
 
Income tax expense
      3,000 
 
Net loss
  $(2,233,000)  $(2,741,000) 
 
Deemed dividend
  $  $(85,000) 
 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
  $(2,233,000)  $(2,826,000) 
 
Net loss per share, basic and diluted
  $(2.84)  $(2.54) 
 
Weighted average share outstanding
   786,750   1,113,622 
 
Weighted average number of shares excluded in basic and diluted net loss per share:
           
 
Convertible preferred stock
   1,614,531   542,678 
 
Preferred stock warrants
   1,361,218   471,161 
 
Common stock warrants
      170,152 
 
Options
   337,500   267,758 
 
Total
   3,313,249   1,451,749 
Balance Sheet Data
As of March 31, 2015
Actual
As adjusted(1)(2)
(unaudited)
Cash and cash equivalents$5,161$   
Total assets$6,403$
Total liabilities2,595
Total stockholders’ equity$6,403$
(1)


   
As of December 31, 2013
 
   Actual  
Pro Forma(1)(3)
  
Pro Forma,
As Adjusted(2)(3)
 
 
Balance Sheet Data:
             
 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $734,000  $734,000  $8,982,222 
 
Total assets
   1,724,000   1,724,000   9,972,222 
 
Total liabilities
   2,019,000   2,019,000   2,019,000 
 
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
   (295,000)   (295,000)   7,953,222 
(1)
  • Pro forma amounts give effect to the issuanceThe as adjusted column reflects our assumed sale of 2,635,397               shares of common stock upon the closing ofin this offering reflecting (i) the automatic conversion into 2,012,152 sharesat an assumed offering price of  $          per share of common stock, the last reported sale price of all our outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock and (ii) the issuance of 623,245 shares of common stock upon the cashless exercise at the assumed initial public offering price of $8.50 per share (the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) of outstanding warrants for convertible preferred stock and subsequent automatic conversion of that convertible preferred stock into common stock.
(2)
  • The pro forma as adjusted balance sheet data reflects the items described in footnote (1) above and gives effect to our receipt of estimated net proceeds from the sale of 1,180,000 shares of common stock at an assumed initial public offering price of $8.50 per share, the midpoint of the price rangeNASDAQ Capital Market on            the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting, 2015, less the estimated underwriting discounts and commissionsplacement agent fees and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
8

(2)
A $1.00$0.50 increase (decrease) in the assumed initialaggregate public offering price of  $8.50 per$          for one share of common stock issued in this offering, would increase (decrease) each of cash and cash equivalents working capital, total assets, additional paid-in capital, and total stockholders’ equitycapitalization by $1,085,600,$          million, assuming that the number of shares of common stock offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting estimated placement agent fees and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We may also increase or decrease the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions.
(3)
  • The pro forma and pro formanumber of shares of common stock we are offering. Each increase of 100,000 shares in the number of shares offered by us at an assumed offering price of  $          per share, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on            , 2015, would increase each of our as adjusted data arecash and cash equivalents, total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization by approximately $         . Similarly, each decrease of 100,000 shares in the number of shares offered by us, at an assumed offering price of  $          per share, the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on            , 2015, would decrease each of our as adjusted cash and cash equivalents, total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization by approximately $         . The as adjusted information presented is illustrative only and will be adjustedchange based on the actual initial public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing.

RISK FACTORS
Risk Factors
Any investmentInvesting in our securitiescommon stock involves a high degree of risk. InvestorsBefore investing in our common stock you should consider carefully consider the risks described below, and all oftogether with the other information contained in this prospectus before deciding whether to purchaseprospectus. If any of the risks set forth below occur, our common stock. Our business, financial condition, or results of operations and trading price or value of our securitiesfuture growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected byaffected. In these risks if anycircumstances, the market price of them actually occur. This prospectus also contains forward-looking statements that involve risksour common stock could decline, and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a resultyou may lose all or part of certain factors, including the risks we face as described below and elsewhere in this prospectus.your investment.
Risks Related to ourOur Business
We have incurred significant losses since inception. There is no assurance that we will ever achieve or maintain profitability.
Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our net loss was $2,233,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $2,741,000$4,515,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Our net loss attributable to common stockholders was $2,233,000 for the year ended December 31, 20132014 compared to $2,826,000$2,233,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012.2013 and $1,372,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to $817,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2013,2015, we had an accumulated deficit of  $9,352,000. Losses are continuing through the date of this prospectus.$15,239,000. To date, we have financed our operations primarily through private placementsthe sale of our equity securities and, to a limited extent, bank financing. In the current economic environment, financing for technology and medical device companies has become increasingly difficult to obtain. Additional financing may not be available in the amount that we need or on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of us by our stockholders would be diluted. In addition, in order to raise additional funds we may have to issue equity or debt securities that have rights, preferences and privileges senior to our existing securities. We have devoted substantially all of our financial resources and efforts to research and development and marketing of our FloChec® system. There can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve or maintain profitability.
Our independent registered public accounting firm’s report for the year ended December 31, 20132014 includes a “going“going concern” explanatory paragraph.
As noted above, we have incurred recurring losses since inception and expect to continue to incur losses as a result of costs and expenses related to our marketing and other promotional activities, research and continued development of our FloChec® product. Our limited capital resources and operations to date have been funded primarily through private placementssales of our equity securities and, to a limited extent, bank financing.financing and revenue from leasing our FloChec® product. As of DecemberMarch 31, 2013,2015, we had working capital of  $1,853,000, cash and restricted cash of  $5,161,000 (which includes $2,100,000 of restricted cash), stockholders’ equity of  $2,595,000 and an accumulated deficit of approximately $9.4 million.$15,239,000. As our revenue grows, our operating expenses will continue to grow and, as a result, we will need to generate significant additional revenues to achieve profitability. Based on our currently available cash, we do not have adequate cash on hand to cover our anticipated expenses for the next 12 months. Accordingly, as a result of our available cash, our auditor’s report for year ended December 31, 20132014 includes an explanatory paragraph that expresses substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a “going concern.” In the event that we are unable to generate sufficient cash from our operating activities or raise additional funds, such as through the completion of this offering, we may be required to delay, reduce or severely curtail our operations or otherwise impede our on-going business efforts, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, financial condition and long-term prospects.
If we do not successfully implement our business strategy, our business and results of operations will be adversely affected.
Our business strategy was formed based on assumptions about the peripheral arterial disease, or PAD, market that might prove wrong. We believe that various demographics and industry-specific trends, including the aging of the general population, growth of capitated payment programs, numbers of undiagnosed patients with PAD and the importance of codifying vascular disease will help drive growth in the PAD market and our risk assessment business. However, these demographics and trends, and our assumptions about them, are uncertain. Actual demand for our productproducts and service offerings could differ materially from projected demand if our assumptions regarding these factors prove to be incorrect or do not materialize, or if alternatives to FloChecour products or other risk assessment service providers gain widespread acceptance.
10

In addition, we may not be able to successfully implement our business strategy. To implement our business strategy we need to, among other things, find new applications for and improve FloChecour products and service offerings and educate healthcare providers and plans about the clinical and cost benefits of our product,products, all of which we believe

could increase acceptance of our productproducts by physicians. In addition, we are seeking to increase our sales and, in order to do so, will need to expand our direct and distributor sales forces in existing and new territories, all of which could result in our becoming subject to additional or different regulatory requirements, with which we may not be able to comply. Moreover, even if we successfully implement our business strategy, our operating results may not improve or may decline. We may decide to alter or discontinue aspects of our business strategy and may adopt different strategies due to business or competitive factors not currently foreseen, such as new medical technologies that would make our productproducts obsolete. Any delay or failure to implement our business strategy may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We currently only have one FDA cleared product, FloChec®; FloChec™FloChec® may not achieve broad market acceptance or be commercially successful.
We currently only have one marketed product. Accordingly, we expect that revenues from FloChec® will account for the vast majority of our revenues for at least the next several years. FloChec® may not gain broad market acceptance unless we continue to convince physicians and plans of its benefits. Moreover, even if physicians understand the benefits of FloChec®, they still may elect not to use FloChec™FloChec® for a variety of reasons, such as the familiarity of the physician with other devices and approaches. We may not be successful in gaining market acceptance of a technique measuring comparative blood flows using our proprietary algorithm to indicate flow obstruction as opposed to existing techniques that measure comparative blood pressures using well-accepted criteria to indicate flow obstruction, or imaging techniques that visualize anatomy of the arteries. Physicians may also object to renting an examining tool with on-going monthly payments rather than making a one-time capital purchase, or be reluctant to pay monthly fees for tools in the examining room when they have many such tools, such as thermometer and stethoscope, that only required one-time minimal purchases.
If physicians do not perceive FloChec® as an attractive alternative to other products, procedures and techniques, we will not achieve significant market penetration or be able to generate significant revenues. To the extent that FloChec® is not commercially successful or is withdrawn from the market for any reason, our revenues will be adversely impacted, and our business, operating results and financial condition will be harmed.
Physicians may not widely adopt FloChecour products unless they determine, based on experience, long-term clinical data and published peer reviewed journal articles, that the use of FloChecour products provides a safe and effective alternative to other existing ABI devices.
We believe that physicians will not widely adopt FloChec® or our other products in development unless they determine, based on experience, long-term clinical data and published peer reviewed journal articles, that the use of FloChecsuch product provides a safe and effective alternative to other existing ABI devices.
We cannot provide any assurance that the data collected from our past, current and any future clinical trials will be sufficient to demonstrate that FloChec™ isour products are an attractive alternative to other ABI devices or procedures. If we fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy that is at least comparable to other ABI devices that are available on the market, our ability to successfully market FloChecour products will be significantly limited. Even if the data collected from clinical studies or clinical experience indicate positive results, each physician’s actual experience with FloChecour products will vary. We also believe that published per-reviewed journal articles and recommendations and support by influential physicians regarding FloChec® and our other products in development will be important for market acceptance and adoption, and we cannot assure you that we will receive these recommendations and support, or that supportive articles will be published. Accordingly, there is a risk that FloChecour products may not be adopted by many physicians, which would negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
11

If healthcare providers are unable to obtain adequate coverage and reimbursement either for procedures performed using our product or patient care incorporating the use of our product, it is unlikely that our product will gain widespread acceptance.
Maintaining and growing revenues from FloChecour products and service offerings depends on the availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors, including government programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, private insurance plans and managed care programs. Healthcare providers that use medical

devices such as FloChec® to test their patients generally rely on third-party payors to pay for all or part of the costs and fees associated with the procedures performed with these devices, or to compensate them for their patient care services. The existence of adequate coverage and reimbursement for the procedures or patient care performed with FloChec® by government and private insurance plans is central to the acceptance of FloChec® and any future products. During the past several years, third-party payors have undertaken cost-containment initiatives including different payment methods, monitoring healthcare expenditures, and anti-fraud initiatives. We may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability if third-party payors deny coverage or reduce their current levels of payment, or if our costs of production increase faster than increases in reimbursement levels. Further, many private payors use coverage decisions and payment amounts determined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, which administers the Medicare program, as guidelines in setting their coverage and reimbursement policies. Future action by CMS or other government agencies may diminish payments to physicians, outpatient centers and/or hospitals. Those private payors that do not follow the Medicare guidelines may adopt different coverage and reimbursement policies for procedures or patient care performed with FloChec®. For some governmental programs, such as Medicaid, coverage and reimbursement differ from state to state, and some state Medicaid programs may not pay an adequate amount for the procedures or patient care performed with FloChec® if any payment is made at all. As the portion of the U.S. population over the age of 65 and eligible for Medicare continues to grow, we may be more vulnerable to coverage and reimbursement limitations imposed by CMS. Furthermore, the healthcare industry in the United States has experienced a trend toward cost containment as government and private insurers seek to control healthcare costs by imposing lower payment rates and negotiating reduced contract rates with service providers. Therefore, we cannot be certain that the procedures or patient care performed with our product will be reimbursed at a cost-effective level.
Our product, FloChec®, is not specifically approved for reimbursement under any third-party payor codes; if third-party payors refuse to reimburse our customers for their use of our product, it could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our product, FloChec®, is purchasedlicensed by healthcare providers, whoproviders. They may bill various third-party payors, including governmental healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, private insurance plans and managed care programs for procedures in which FloChec® is used. Reimbursement is a significant factor considered by healthcare providers in determining whether to acquirelicense medical devices or systems such as FloChec®. Although it is our intent that FloChec™FloChec® be incorporated as a tool in the routine physical exam of adult patients by primary care providers in a similar fashion to the use of a thermometer or stethoscope (such that reimbursement is not sought), we cannot control whether or not providers who use FloChec®will seek reimbursement. Therefore, our ability to successfully commercialize FloChec® could depend on the adequacy of coverage and reimbursement from these third-party payors.
Currently, FloChec® is not specifically approved for any particular reimbursement code. Although most of our customers report being covered and reimbursed by third-party payors consistently for procedures using a variety of different reimbursement codes, there is a risk that third-party payors may disagree with the reimbursement under a particular code. In addition, some potential customers have deferred renting our product given the uncertainty regarding reimbursement. We do not track denial of requests for reimbursement made by the users of our product. It is our belief that such denials have occurred and might occur in the future with more or less frequency. Even if our product and procedures are often currently covered and reimbursed by third-party payors and Medicare, problems for customers to receive reimbursement or adverse changes in payors’ coverage and reimbursement policies that affect our product could harm our ability to market FloChec®. Obtaining approval for a particular reimbursement code is timelytime consuming and can be costly. Accordingly, at this time, and given the way we intend FloChec® to be used, we do not intend to pursue formal approval for FloChec® for any particular code.
12

Moreover, we are unable to predict what changes will be made to the reimbursement methodologies used by third-party payors. We cannot be certain that under current and future payment systems, in which healthcare providers may be reimbursed a set amount based on the type of procedure performed, such as those utilized by Medicare and in many privately managed care systems, the cost of our product will be justified and incorporated into the overall cost of the procedure.

We have limited experience marketing FloChec® and may not be able to generate anticipated sales.
Because we launched FloChec® in the first quarter of 2011, we have limited experience marketing our product. As of JanuaryMarch 31, 2014,2015, we had 16 employees dedicated to sales and marketing of our U.S. sales force consisted of 5 exclusive sales representatives.product. In August 2012, we signedbegan a co-exclusive supply and distribution agreementarrangement with Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., a large medical device company, to distribute FloChec®. Our operating results are directly dependent upon our sales and marketing efforts and to a lesser extent, the efforts of our co-exclusive contract distributor. While we expect our sales representativesand marketing force and our co-exclusive contract distributor to develop long-lasting relationships with the physicians and healthcare providers they serve and provide services in accordance with our standards. However, we do not control our co-exclusive contract distributor, and it operates and oversees its own daily operations. There is a risk that our co-exclusive contract distributor will not always act consistent with our best interests. If our co-exclusive contract distributor fails to adequately promote and market FloChec®, our revenues could decrease and we might not be able to achieve or maintain profitability and it could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We face challenges and risk in managing and maintaining our distribution network and the parties who make up that network.
We face significant challenges and risks in managing our distribution network and retaining the parties who make up that network. If any of our direct sales representativesor marketing force were to leaveresign us, or if our co-exclusive distributor were to cease to do business with us, our sales could be adversely affected. Our co-exclusive distributor accounted for less than 20% of our revenue for each of the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013. If our co-exclusive distributor were to cease to distribute our product, it would slow down our efforts to gain widespread market acceptance of FloChec®. Although we have a good relationship with our co-exclusive distributor and have no reason to believe that our current contract will not be renewed when it expires at the end of 2014,December 2015 or that our co-exclusive distributor will terminate our arrangement prior to expiration (which it is permitted to do upon 90 days’ notice under our contract), we may need to seek out alternatives, such as increasing our direct sales and marketing force or contracting with external independent sales representatives or enter another distributor relationship. There is no guarantee that we would be successful in our efforts to find independent sales representatives or another large distributor, or that we would be able to negotiate contract terms favorable to us. Failure to hire or retain qualified direct sales representativesand marketing personnel or independent distributors would prevent us from expanding our business and generating revenues, which would have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve or maintain profitability.
To adequately commercialize FloChec™,our products, we may need to increase our sales and marketing network, which will require us to hire, train, retain and supervise employees.employees and other independent contractors.
IfWe are currently exploring other sales models to generate revenue from our products in addition to the leasing model. These include our recently launched WellChec™ multi-test platform. As we increase our marketing efforts with respect to FloChec™, or launchpursue these new productsstrategies, and expand our efforts to target insurance plans that serve Medicare Advantage members, we willmay need to expand the reach ofincrease our marketingsales and salesmarketing network. Our future success will depend largely on our ability to continue to hire, train, retain and motivate skilled direct sales representatives, independent sales representatives or distributors with significant technical knowledge about our product.product, in addition to coordinating networks of contract medical assistants and other personnel to staff health and wellness fairs and physicians’ offices in fee-for-service models. New hires and independent contractors require training, supervision and take time to achieve full productivity. If we fail to train and supervise new hires adequately, or if we experience high turnover in our sales force or trained professionals in the future, we cannot be certain that new hireswe will become as productive as may be necessary to maintain or increase our sales. If we are unable to expand our sales and marketing capabilities, we may not be able to effectively commercialize FloChec® or our other products and service offerings in development, which would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
13

We do not require our customers to enter into long-term leaseslicenses or maintenance contracts for FloChecour products or services and may therefore lose customers on short notice.
Our business is primarily based on a serviceleasing model rather than an outright sale of our FloChec™ product.products. Ourservice model pricing is based on data collected on use rates of FloChecand third-party payment rates to physicians and facilities usingfor the use of our product. We require no down payment, long-term commitment or maintenance contract or fees from our customers and replace damaged products free of charge in the service model. If we lose current customers on short notice, we may not be able to find new customers to replace them with in a timely manner and that could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, our business model of replacing damaged products free of charge may prove to be costly and affect the profitability of our service model.

We rely heavily upon the talents of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer, the loss of either could severely damage our business.
Our performance depends to a large extent on a small number of key scientific, technical, managerial and marketing personnel. In particular, we believe our success is highly dependent upon the services and reputation of our Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, and our Chief Operating Officer, Robert G. McRae. Dr. Murphy-Chutorian and Mr. McRae each provide highly valuable contributions in instituting a strong focus of specification methods, test method development and improved product quality. In particular, Mr. McRae has defined our product development pipeline and budget, provided design controls and enhanced the customer support functions. We do not have key man insurance for either Mr. McRae, or Dr. Murphy-Chutorian. The loss of either Dr. Murphy-Chutorian or Mr. McRae’s services could still severely damage our business prospects, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on a sole independent supplier and single facility for the manufacturing of FloChec®. Any delay or disruption in the supply of the product or facility, may negatively impact our operations.
We manufacture our product, FloChec®, through a sole independent contractor. The loss or disruption of our relationships with outside vendors could subject us to substantial delays in the delivery of our product to customers. Significant delays in the delivery of our product could result in possible cancellation of orders and the loss of customers. Although we expect our vendor to comply with our contract terms, we do not have control over our vendor. Our inability to provide a product that meets delivery schedules could have a material adverse effect on our reputation in the industry, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Further, we manufacture FloChec® through this sole contract manufacturer in one single facility. If an event occurred that resulted in material damage to this manufacturing facility or our manufacturing contractor lacked sufficient labor to fully operate the facility, we may be unable to transfer the manufacture of FloChec® to another facility or location in a cost-effective or timely manner, if at all. This potential inability to transfer production could occur for a number of reasons, including but not limited to a lack of necessary relevant manufacturing capability at another facility, or the regulatory requirements of the FDA or other governmental regulatory bodies. Even if there are many qualified contract manufacturers available around the country and our product is relatively easy to manufacture, such an event could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Because we operate in an industry with significant product liability risk, and we may not be sufficiently insured against this risk, we may be subject to substantial claims against our product.product or services that we may provide.
The development, manufacture and sale, lease or use of products usedor provision of services in a medical setting entails significant risks of product liability or other negligence or malpractice claims. Although we maintain product liability insurance to cover us in the event of liability claims, and as of the date of this prospectus, no such claims have been asserted or threatened against us, our insurance may not be sufficient to cover all possible future liabilities regarding our product, liabilities.or from performing tests with our product or other non-proprietary products. Accordingly, we may not be adequately protected from any liabilities, including any adverse judgments or settlements, we might incur in connection with the development, clinical testing, manufacture
14

and sale, lease or use of our product.products or the provision of services. A successful product liability claim or negligence or medical malpractice claim or series of claims brought against us that result in an adverse judgment against or settlement by us in excess of any insurance coverage could seriously harm our financial condition or reputation. Moreover, even if no judgments, fines, damages or liabilities are imposed on us, our reputation could suffer, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, product liability and other malpractice insurance is expensive and may not always be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all.
We may implement a product recall or voluntary market withdrawal or stop shipment of our product due to product defects or product enhancements and modifications, which would significantly increase our costs.
The manufacturing and marketing of FloChec® and any future products that we may develop involves an inherent risk that our products may prove to be defective. In that event, we may voluntarily implement a recall or market withdrawal or stop shipment, or may be required to do so by a regulatory authority. A recall of FloChec® or one of our future products, or a similar product manufactured by another manufacturer, could impair sales of the products we market as a result of confusion concerning the scope of the recall or as a result of the damage to our reputation for quality and safety. Further any product recall, voluntary market withdrawal or shipment stoppage of our product could significantly increase our costs and have a material adverse effect on our business.

If we fail to properly manage our anticipated growth, our business could suffer.
Our growth has placed, and will continue to place, a significant strain on our management and on our operational and financial resources and systems. Failure to manage our growth effectively could cause us to over-invest or under-invest, and result in losses or weaknesses. Additionally, our anticipated growth will increase the demands placed on our supplier, resulting in an increased need for us to carefully monitor for quality assurance. Any failure by us to manage our growth effectively could have an adverse effect on our ability to achieve our development and commercialization goals.
Fluctuations in insurance cost and availability could adversely affect our profitability or our risk management profile.
We hold a number of insurance policies, including product liability insurance, directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance. If the costs of maintaining adequate insurance coverage increase significantly in the future, our operating results could be materially adversely affected. Likewise, if any of our current insurance coverage should become unavailable to us or become economically impractical, we would be required to operate our business without indemnity from commercial insurance providers. If we operate our business without insurance, we could be responsible for paying claims or judgments against us that would have otherwise been covered by insurance, which could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.
We will need to generate significant revenues to become and remain profitable.
We intend to increase our operating expenses substantially as we add sales representatives to increase our geographic sales coverage, increase our marketing capabilities, pursue research and new product and service offering development and increase our general and administrative functions to support our growing operations. We will need to generate significant sales to achieve and maintain profitability and we might not be able to do so. Even if we do generate significant sales, we might not be able to become profitable or sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis in the future. If our sales grow more slowly than we anticipate or if our operating expenses exceed our expectations, our financial performance will likely be adversely affected.
Our future financial performance will depend in part on the successful improvements and software updates to FloChec® on a cost-effective basis.
Our future financial performance will depend in part on our ability to influence, anticipate, identify and respond to changing consumer preferences and needs and the technologies relating to the care and treatment of vascular problems. We can provide no assurances that FloChec® will achieve significant
15

commercial success as in the past and that it will gain meaningful market share. We may not correctly anticipate or identify trends in consumer preferences or needs, or may identify them later than competitors do. In addition, difficulties in manufacturing or in obtaining regulatory approvals may delay or prohibit improvements to FloChec™.® or our other products in development. Further, we may not be able to develop improvements and software updates to FloChec® at a cost that allows us to meet our goals for profitability. Service costs relating to our product may be greater than anticipated, rentals may be returned prior to the end of the leaselicense term, and we may be required to devote significant resources to address any quality issues associated with FloChec®.
Failure to successfully introduce improve or update FloChecour products on a cost-effective basis, or delays in customer decisions related to the evaluation of FloChecour products could cause us to lose market acceptance and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in an intensely competitive and rapidly changing business environment, and there is a substantial risk our products or service offerings could become obsolete or uncompetitive.
The market for medical systems, equipment and other devices and services is highly competitive. We compete with many medical service companies in the United States and internationally in connection with FloChec® and products under development. We face competition from numerous companies in the diagnostic area, as well as competition from academic institutions, government agencies and research institutions. Most of our current and potential competitors have, and will continue to have, substantially greater financial, technological, research and development, regulatory and clinical, manufacturing, marketing and sales,

distribution and personnel resources than we do. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient resources to successfully commercialize FloChec® or any other future products, that we may develop, if and when they are approved for sale or lease.license, or service offerings that we may develop. Our future success will depend largely upon our ability to anticipate and keep pace with developments and advances. Current or future competitors could develop alternative technologies or products or service offerings that are more effective, easier to use or more economical than what we or any potential licensee develop. If our technologies or products or service offerings become obsolete or uncompetitive, our related product sales and licensing revenue would decrease. This would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
One of our business strategies is developing additional products and service offerings that allow healthcare providers to capture the full reimbursement potentialdeliver cost-effective wellness and receive increased compensation for their services. The development of new products and service offerings involves time and expense and we may never realize the benefits of this investment.
As part of our business strategy, we intend to develop additional products and service offerings that allow healthcare providers to capture the full reimbursement potentialdeliver cost-effective wellness and receive increased compensation for their services. Such product and service offering development may require substantial investments and we may commit significant resources and time before knowing whether our efforts will translate into profits for our company. It is possible that our development efforts will not be successful and that we will not be able to develop new products or service offerings, or if developed that such productswe will obtain the necessary regulatory approvals for commercialization. Even if approved,we receive necessary regulatory approvals, there is no guarantee that such approved products or any new service offerings will achieve market acceptance and we may never realize the benefits of any investment in this strategy.
Risks Related to ourOur Legal and Regulatory Environment
Our business is subject to many laws and government regulations governing the manufacture and sale of medical devices, including the FDA’s 510(k) clearance process.process, and laws and regulations governing patient data and information, among others.
FloChec® and any future are medical devices that we may develop or services that we may offer are subject to extensive regulation in the United States by the federal government, including by the FDA. The FDA regulates virtually all aspects of a medical device’s design, development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, storage, record keeping, adverse event reporting, sale, promotion, distribution and shipping. We must report to the FDA when evidence suggests that one of our devices may have caused or contributed to death or
16

serious injury or has malfunctioned and the device or a similar device would be likely to cause or contribute to death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. If such adverse event occurred, we could incur substantial expense and harm to our reputation and our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Before a new medical device can be marketed in the United States, it must first receive either premarket approval or 510(k) clearance from the FDA, unless an exemption exists. The same rule applies when a manufacturer plans to market a medical device for a new use. The process can be costly and time-consuming. The FDA is expected to respond to a section 510(k) notification in 90 days, but often takes much longer. The premarket approval process usually takes six months to three years, but may take longer. We cannot assure that any new medical devices or new useuses or modifications for FloChec® that we develop will be cleared or approved in a timely or cost-effective manner, if cleared or approved at all. Even if such devicesclearances or approvals are cleared or approved, the productsreceived, they may not be cleared or approved for all indications. Because medical devices may only be marketed for cleared or approved indications, this could significantly limit the market for that product and may adversely affect our results of operations.
FloChec® was initially cleared through the 510(k) clearance process in February 2010.2010 (as FloChec®), and in March 2015 we received FDA clearance of this next generation version. However, any further modification to a cleared 510(k) device that could significantly affect its safety or efficacy, or that would constitute a significant change in its intended use, will require a new clearance process. The FDA requires device manufacturers to make their own determination regarding whether a modification requires a new clearance; however, the FDA can review and invalidate a manufacturer’s decision not to file for a new clearance. We cannot guarantee that the FDA will agree with our decisions not to seek clearances for particular device modifications or that we will be successful in obtaining 510(k) clearances for modifications. Any such additional clearance processes with the FDA could delay our ability to market a modified product and may adversely affect our results of operations.
Moreover, as we explore other opportunities to generate revenue, which include performing risk assessment testing for physicians or insurance plans on their patient pools, we are subject to additional laws and regulations regarding the provision of such services. Although we intend to subcontract for qualified and licensed professionals to use our FloChec® device, among others, to provide risk assessment services to our customers’ patients, the provision of such services is subject to a number of laws and regulations, including with respect to patient data and other information.

The FDA may change its policies, adopt additional regulations, or revise existing regulations, in particular relating to the 510(k) clearance process.
The FDA also may change its policies, adopt additional regulations, or revise existing regulations, each of which could prevent or delay premarket approval or 510(k) clearance of a device, or could impact our ability to market our currently cleared device. We anticipate significant changes in the near future that will affect the way the 510(k) clearance program will operate. On August 3, 2010, the FDA released for public comment two internal working group reports with numerous recommendations to improve the 510(k) clearance process and utilize science in regulatory decision making to encourage innovation yet maintain predictability of the clearance process. In July, 2011, the Institute of Medicine, which was asked by the FDA to evaluate and make recommendations on the 510(k) clearance program released its report entitled “Medical Devices and the Public’s Health, The FDA 510(k) Clearance Process.” The report contained numerous and broad recommendations that, if followed, will have a significant impact on the medical device industry. Also in July, 2011, the FDA issued a draft guidance titled “510(k) Device Modifications: Deciding When to Submit a 510(k) for a Change to an Existing Device.” This draft guidance document was withdrawn on July 17, 2012 in accordance with Section 510(n)(2)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act as amended by the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act. An existing 1997 guidance on the same topic therefore remains in effect, but any future reforms could require us to file new 510(k) clearances and could increase the total number of 510(k) clearance to be filed. We cannot predict what effect these reforms will have on our ability to obtain 510(k) clearances in a timely manner. We also cannot predict the nature of other regulatory reforms and their resulting effects on our business.
17

Our business is subject to unannounced inspections by FDA to determine our compliance with FDA requirements.
FDA inspections can result in inspectional observations on FDA’s Form-483, warning letters or other forms of more significant enforcement action. More specifically, if FDA concludes that we are not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, or that FloChec® or any future medical device we develop is ineffective or pose an unreasonable health risk, the FDA could:

  • require us to notify health professionals and others that our devices present unreasonable risk of substantial harm to public health;

  • order us to recall, repair, replace or refund the cost of any medical device that we manufactured or distributed;

  • detain, seize or ban adulterated or misbranded medical devices;

  • refuse to provide us with documents necessary to export our product;

  • refuse requests for 510(k) clearance or premarket approval of new products or new intended uses;

  • withdraw 510(k) clearances that are already granted;

  • impose operating restrictions, including requiring a partial or total shutdown of production;

  • enjoin or restrain conduct resulting in violations of applicable law pertaining to medical devices; and/or

  • assess criminal or civil penalties against our officers, employees or us.
If the FDA concludes that we failed to comply with any regulatory requirement during an inspection, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. We could incur substantial expense and harm to our reputation, and our ability to introduce new or enhanced products in a timely manner could be adversely affected.
Although part of our business strategy is based on certain advantageous new payment provisions enacted under the current government healthcare reform, we also face significant uncertainty in the industry regarding the implementation of the Health Care Reform Law.
Political, economic and regulatory influences are subjecting the healthcare industry to fundamental changes. In March 2010, President Obama signed into law the Health Care Reform Law. The Health Care Reform Law has brought a new way of doing business for providers and health insurance plans. We believe

that fee for service programs will be reduced in favor of capitated programs that pay a monthly fee per patient. Risk factor adjustments per patient will provide payment that is higher for sicker patients who have conditions that are codified. Quality of care measured by completeness and wellness will induce higher payments per patient. These changes are already in place for 1416 million participants in the Medicare Advantage program and are expected to expand to more types of insured patients as healthcare reform is deployed. Although we expect these measures to be mainly positive for our business given the ability of FloChec® to measure blood flow in an in-office setting, which can assist doctors and other providers to suspect PAD and other vascular diseases, due to uncertainties regarding the ultimate features of the new federal legislation and its implementation, we cannot predict what impact the Health Care Reform Law may have on us, our customers or our industry. If the Health Care Reform Law is not implemented as we anticipate, or if changes are made in the implementation of the Health Care Reform Law such that there are no incentives for identifying sicker patients, it would negatively affect our business prospects and strategy, and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, the Health Care Reform Law imposes a 2.3% excise tax on the sale, lease, rental or use of any taxable human medical device after December 31, 2012, subject to certain exclusions, by the manufacturer, producer or importer of such device. Generally, the lease of a taxable medical device by the manufacturer will be treated as a sale for purposes of the medical device excise tax, and the medical device excise tax will be imposed on the portion of the lease payment that relates to the use of the taxable medical device (subject to limitation in certain circumstances). The total cost to the industry is expected to be approximately $30 billion over ten years. This new and significant tax burden could have a negative impact
18

on our results of our operations. Further, the Health Care Reform Act encourages hospitals and physicians to work collaboratively through shared savings programs, such as accountable care organizations, as well as other bundled payment initiatives, which may ultimately result in the reduction of medical device acquisitions and the consolidation of medical device suppliers used by hospitals. While passage of the Health Care Reform Law may ultimately expand the pool of potential patients for FloChec™,® and encourage the use of health risk assessment devices and services, the above-discussed changes could adversely affect our financial results and business.
Our business may be adversely impacted by the recent sequestration signed into law in the United States.
On March 1, 2013, most agencies of the federal government automatically reduced their budgets according to an agreement made by Congress in 2012 known as “sequestration.” Originally devised as an incentive to force Congressional agreement on budget issues, the sequestration order was approved on March 1, 2013 by the President of the United States. For claims submitted with dates of service or dates of discharge after April 1, 2013, these cuts will result in Medicare payments to health care providers, health care plans and drug plans being reduced by 2%.
The applicable healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations, along with the increased enforcement environment, may lead to an enforcement action targeting us, which could adversely affect our business.
We are subject to healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute, state anti-kickback statutes, the Federal False Claims Act, and state false claims acts. Additionally, to the extent we maintain financial relationships with physicians and other healthcare providers, we may be subject to Federal and state physician payment sunshine laws and regulations, which require us to track and disclose these financial relationships. These and other laws regulate interactions amongst health care entities and with sources of referrals of business, among other things. The Federal Anti-Kickback Statute is a criminal statute that imposes substantial penalties on persons or entities that offer, solicit, pay or receive payments in return for referrals, recommendations, purchases or orders of items or services that are reimbursable by Federal healthcare programs. The False Claims Act imposes liability, including treble damages and per claim penalties, on any person or entity that submits or causes to be submitted a claim to the Federal government that he or she knows (or should know) is false. The Health Care Reform Law further provides that a claim submitted for items or services, the provision of which resulted from a violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute, is “false” under the False Claims Act and certain other false claims statutes.
We may be subject to liability under these laws and may also be subject to liability for any future conduct that is deemed by the government or the courts to violate these laws. Additionally, over the past ten years, partially as the result of the passage of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of

1996 and of the Health Care Reform Law, the government has pursued an increasing number of enforcement actions. This increased enforcement environment may increase scrutiny of us, directly or indirectly, and could increase the likelihood of an enforcement action targeting us. We have entered into a supply and distribution agreement with Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., as well as purchase agreements with a number of our customers, includingand intend to start offering risk assessment services to our customers. These customers include parties that bill Federal healthcare programs for use of our product, all of whom may be subject to government scrutiny. Finally, to the extent that any of the agreements are breached or terminated, our business may experience a decrease in revenues. In addition, to the extent that our customers, many of whom are providers, may be affected by this increased enforcement environment, our business could correspondingly be affected. It is possible that a review of our business practices or those of our customers by courts or government authorities could result in a determination with an adverse effect on our business. We cannot predict the effect of possible future enforcement actions on our business.
Changes in, or interpretations of, tax rules and regulations may adversely affect our effective tax rates.
We are subject to income and other taxes in the United States. Significant judgment is required in evaluating our provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. For example, there could be changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities or changes in the relevant tax, accounting, and other laws, regulations, principles and interpretations. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different from our historical income tax provisions and accruals. The results of an audit or litigation, or the effects of a change in tax policy in the United States, could have a material effect on our operating results in the period or periods for which that determination is made.
19

We are an “emerging growth company,” and the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies may make our common stock less attractive to investors.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and may remain an emerging growth company for up to five years.years from our first sale of securities pursuant to an effective registration statement. For so long as we remain an emerging growth company, we are permitted and intend to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. These exemptions include:

  • being permitted to provide only two years of audited financial statements, in addition to any required unaudited interim financial statements, with correspondingly reduced “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” disclosure;

  • not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements in the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting;

  • not being required to comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements;

  • reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation; and

  • exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholderstockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.
We have taken advantage of reduced reporting burdens in this prospectus. In particular, in this prospectus, we have not included all of the executive compensation related information that would be required if we were not an emerging growth company. We cannot predict whether investors will find our common stock less attractive if we rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile. In addition, the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of these accounting standards until they would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to avail ourselves of this exemption and, therefore,

we will not be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. As a result of this election, our financial statements may not be comparable to other companies that comply with public company effective dates.
We have incurred and will continue to incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management has been and will continue to be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives and corporate governance practices.
As a newly public company, we have incurred and particularlywill continue to incur increased costs, and our management has been and will continue to be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives and corporate governance practices. Moreover, after we are no longer an emerging growth company, and in particular if we are no longer a smaller reporting company, we will incur additional significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company.to address compliance and corporate governance. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the listing requirements of The NASDAQ Capital Market and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose various requirements on public companies, including establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. OurAlthough we are currently both an emerging growth company and smaller reporting company, our management and other personnel will nevertheless need to continue to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, thesethe currently applicable rules and regulations will increasehave already increased our legal and financial compliance costs and will makemade some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, we expect that these rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, which in turn could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our Board of Directors.
We are evaluatingcontinuing to evaluate these rules and regulations, and cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs. These rules and regulations are often subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices.
20

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, we will be required to furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting. However, even if we are no longer a smaller reporting company, while we remain an emerging growth company, we will not be required to include an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting firm. To achieve compliance with Section 404 within the prescribed period, we will be engaged in a process to document and evaluate our internal control over financial reporting, which is both costly and challenging. In this regard, we will need to continue to dedicate internal resources, potentially engage outside consultants and adopt a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, continue steps to improve control processes as appropriate, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting. Despite our efforts, there is a risk that we will not be able to conclude, within the prescribed timeframe or at all, that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as required by Section 404. If we identify one or more material weaknesses, it could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements.
We currently have previously identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to successfully remediate theseidentify additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting in the future, or if our former material weaknesses recur, it could have an adverse effect on our company.
In connection with the audits of our financial statements for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013, and 2012, our management and independent registered public accounting firm identified certain material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. These material weaknesses related to our lack of a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of knowledge and experience in the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, commensurate with our financial reporting requirements and the fact that policies and procedures with respect to the review, supervision, and monitoring of our accounting and reporting functions were either not designed and in place or not operating effectively. As a result, numerous audit adjustments to our financial statements were identified during the course of the audits.audit. Our management and independent registered public accounting firm did not perform an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20132014 or 2012 2013 in accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Had we and our independent registered public accounting firm performed an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting in

accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, additional control deficiencies may have been identified by management or our independent registered public accounting firm, and those control deficiencies could have also represented one or more material weaknesses.
In an effortAlthough we implemented measures to remediateremedy these material weaknesses, soon after the closing of the initial public offering, we intend to increase the number of our finance and accounting personnel, including hiring a Chief Financial Officer with public company experience. We cannot assure you that these measures will significantly improve or remediate the material weakness described above. We also cannot assure you that we have identified all or that we will not in the future have additional material weaknesses. Accordingly, material weaknesses may still exist when we report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for purposes of our attestation when required by reporting requirements under the Exchange Act or Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act after this offering.Act. If we are not able to remedy these material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, or if we have additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting in the future, it could have an adverse effect on our company.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
Our success largely depends on our ability to obtain and protect the proprietary information on which we base our product.
Our success depends in large part upon our ability to establish and maintain the proprietary nature of our technology through the patent process, as well as our ability to license from others patents and patent applications necessary to develop our product. If our patent or any future patents are successfully challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or our right or ability to manufacture our product was to be limited, our ability to continue to manufacture and market our product could be adversely affected. In addition to patents, we rely on trade secrets and proprietary know-how, which we seek to protect, in part, through confidentiality and proprietary information agreements. The other parties to these agreements may breach these provisions, and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. Additionally, our trade secrets could otherwise become known to or be independently developed by competitors.
21

As of JanuaryMarch 31, 2014,2015, we have been issued, or have rights to, one U.S. patent. In addition, we have filed three U.S. patent applications that are still pending. The patent we hold may be successfully challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or we may otherwise be unable to rely on this patent. These risks are also present for the process we use for manufacturing our product. In addition, our competitors, many of whom have substantial resources and have made substantial investments in competing technologies, may apply for and obtain patents that prevent, limit or interfere with our ability to make, use and sell our product, either in the United States or in international markets. The medical device industry has been characterized by extensive litigation regarding patents and other intellectual property rights. We may institute, become party to, or be threatened with, future adversarial proceedings or litigation regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our product and technology, including interference or derivation proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO. Third parties may assert infringement claims against us based on existing patents or patents that may be granted in the future. If we are found to infringe a third party’s intellectual property rights, we could be required to obtain a license from such third party to continue developing and marketing our product and technology. However, we may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we were able to obtain a license, it could be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us. We could be forced, including by court order, to cease commercializing the infringing technology or product. In addition, we could be found liable for monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees if we are found to have willfully infringed a patent. A finding of infringement could prevent us from commercializing our product or force us to cease some of our business operations, which could materially harm our business. Claims that we have misappropriated the confidential information or trade secrets of third parties could have a similar negative impact on our business. The defense and prosecution of intellectual property suits, USPTO proceedings and related legal and administrative proceedings are both costly and time consuming. Any litigation or interference proceedings involving us may require us to incur substantial legal and other fees and expenses and may require some of our employees to devote all or a substantial portion of their time to the proceedings.

We may need to license intellectual property from third parties, and such licenses may not be available or may not be available on commercially reasonable terms.
A third party may hold intellectual property, including patent rights that are important or necessary to the development of FloChec® or any future products. It may be necessary for us to use the patented or proprietary technology of a third party to commercialize our own technology or products, in which case we would be required to obtain a license from such third party. A license to such intellectual property may not be available or may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We may be subject to claims by third parties asserting that our employees or we have misappropriated their intellectual property, or claiming ownership of what we regard as our own intellectual property.
Although we try to ensure that we and our employees and independent contractors do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or that these employees or independent contractors or we have used or disclosed intellectual property in violation of the rights of others. These claims may cover a range of matters, such as challenges to our trademarks, as well as claims that our employees or independent contractors are using trade secrets or other proprietary information of any such employee’s former employer or independent contractors. Although we do not expect the resolution of the proceeding to have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition, litigation to defend ourselves against claims can be both costly and time consuming, and divert management’s attention away from growing our business.
In addition, while it is our policy to require our employees and independent contractors who may be involved in the development of intellectual property to execute agreements assigning such intellectual property to us, we may be unsuccessful in executing such an agreement with each party who in fact develops intellectual property that we regard as our own. Our and their assignment agreements may not be self-executing or may be breached, and we may be forced to bring claims against third parties, or defend claims they may bring against us, to determine the ownership of what we regard as our intellectual property.
22

If we fail in prosecuting or defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. Even if we are successful in prosecuting or defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management.
Intellectual property litigation could cause us to spend substantial resources and distract our personnel from their normal responsibilities.
Even if resolved in our favor, litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual property claims may cause us to incur significant expenses, and could distract our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common stock. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce the resources available for development activities or any future sales, marketing or distribution activities. We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to conduct such litigation or proceedings adequately. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could compromise our ability to compete in the marketplace.
If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.
In addition to seeking patents for some of our technology and product, we also rely on trade secrets, including unpatented know-how, technology and other proprietary information, to maintain our competitive position. We seek to protect these trade secrets, in part, by entering into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to them, such as our employees, corporate collaborators, outside scientific collaborators, contract manufacturers, consultants, advisors and other third parties. We also generally enter into confidentiality and invention or patent assignment agreements with our employees and consultants. Despite these efforts, any of these parties may breach the agreements and

disclose our proprietary information, including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches. Enforcing a claim that a party infringed a patent or illegally disclosed or misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts inside and outside the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we would have no right to prevent them, or those to whom they communicate it, from using that technology or information to compete with us. If any of our trade secrets were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor, our competitive position would be harmed.
Risks Related to our Common Stock and this Offering
After this offering, ourOur executive officers Directors and principal stockholders,directors, if they choose to act together, will continue to have the ability to control all matters submitted to stockholders for approval.
UponOur executive officers and directors beneficially own in the closing of this offering, and assuming the sale of 1,180,000aggregate shares representing approximately 25.1% of our common stock at an assumed initial public offer priceas of $8.50 per share (which is the midpoint of the price range on the cover page of this prospectus) our executive officers and Directors, combined with our other existing stockholders who owned more than 5% of our outstanding common stock before this offering will, in the aggregate, beneficially own shares representing approximately 54.0% of our common stock. In addition, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian, has indicated an interest in purchasing up to 35,400 shares of our common stock in this offering at the initial public offering price. If any such additional shares are purchased by Dr. Murphy-Chutorian in this offering, this percentage would increase. March 31, 2015. If these stockholders were to choose to act together, they would beare able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, as well as our management and affairs. For example, these persons, if they choose to act together, wouldcan control the election of directors and approval of any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. This concentration of ownership control may:

  • delay, defer or prevent a change in control;

  • entrench our management and the Boardboard of Directors;directors; or

  • impede a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving us that other stockholders may desire.
23

Provisions in our corporate charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of our company, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management.
Provisions in our corporate charter and our bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control of our company that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares. These provisions could also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock, thereby depressing the market price of our common stock. In addition, because our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our Boardboard of Directors.directors. Among other things, these provisions:

  • allow the authorized number of our Directorsdirectors to be changed only by resolution of our board of directors;

  • establish advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals that can be acted on at stockholder meetings and nominations to our Boardboard of Directors;
directors;

  • require that stockholder actions must be effected at a duly called stockholder meeting; and

  • limit who may call stockholder meetings.
Moreover, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a person who owns in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock, unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner.

If you purchase shares of common stock in this offering, you will suffer immediate dilution of your investment.
The initial public offering price of our common stock will be substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share of our common stock. Therefore, if you purchase shares of our common stock in this offering, you will pay a price per share that substantially exceeds our net tangible book value per share after this offering. To the extent shares subsequently are issued, you will incur further dilution. Based on an assumed initial public offering price of $8.50 per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, you will experience immediate dilution of $6.77 per share, representing the difference between our pro forma net tangible book value per share, after giving effect to this offering, and the assumed initial public offering price. In addition, purchasers of common stock in this offering will have contributed approximately 53% of the aggregate price paid by all purchasers of our stock but will own only approximately 26% of our common stock outstanding after this offering.
An active trading market for our common stock may not develop.
Prior to thisour initial public offering, there has beenwas no public market for our common stock. The initial public offering price forAlthough our common stock will be determined through negotiations with the underwriters. Although we have applied to have our common stock approved for listinghas traded on The NASDAQ Capital Market since February 2014, an active trading market for our shares may never develop or be sustained following this offering.sustained. If an active market for our common stock does not develop, it may be difficult for you to sell our shares you purchase in this offering without depressing the market price for the shares or at all.
The price of our common stock may be volatile and fluctuate substantially, which could result in substantial losses for purchasers of our common stock in this offering.stock.
Our stock price has been and is likely to continue to be volatile. The stock market in general and the market for smaller medical device companies in particular have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. As a result of this volatility, you may not be able to sell your common stock at or above the initial public offering price.stock. The market price for our common stock may be influenced by many factors, including:

  • the success of competitive products, services or technologies;

  • regulatory or legal developments in the United States and other countries;

  • developments or disputes concerning patent applications, issued patents or other proprietary rights;

  • the recruitment or departure of key personnel;

  • actual or anticipated changes in estimates as to financial results, development timelines or recommendations by securities analysts;

  • variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us;


24

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  • general economic, industry and market conditions; and

We have broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds from this offering and may not use them effectively.
Our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds from this offering and could spend the proceeds in ways that do not improve our results of operations or enhance the value of our common stock. The failure by our management to apply these funds effectively could result in financial losses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, and cause the price of our common stock to decline. Pending their use, we may invest the net proceeds from this offering in a manner that does not produce income or that loses value.

A significant portion of our total outstanding shares are eligible to be sold into the market in the near future, which could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of stockholders intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of our common stock. After this offering, we will have 4,602,147 outstanding shares of common stock based on the number of shares outstanding as of January 31, 2014 and reflecting the automatic conversion of all of our outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock and the cashless exercise of warrants to acquire additional shares of our convertible preferred stock (which will convert into common stock) in connection with the offering based on an assumed initial public offering price of $8.50 per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. This number includes the 1,180,000 shares that we are selling in this offering, which may be resold in the public market immediately without restriction, unless purchased by our affiliates or existing stockholders. All of the remaining outstanding shares of our common stock are currently restricted as a result of securities laws or lock-up agreements but will become eligible to be sold at various times after the offering. In addition, the current holders of our outstanding shares of common stock and convertible preferred stock have certain registration rights with respect to their shares of common stock, including shares of common stock issuable upon conversion thereof and shares of common stock issued as a dividend or other distribution with respect to or in exchange for or in replacement of the foregoing shares. See “Description of Securities — Registration Rights.”
Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gain.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. In addition, the terms of any future debt agreements may preclude us from paying dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.
We have broad discretion in how we use the net proceeds of this offering, and we may not use these proceeds effectively or in ways with which you agree.
Our management will have broad discretion as to the application of the net proceeds of this offering and could use them for purposes other than those contemplated at the time of this offering. Our stockholders may not agree with the manner in which our management chooses to allocate and spend the net proceeds. Moreover, our management may use the net proceeds for corporate purposes that may not increase the market price of our common stock.
You may experience immediate and substantial dilution in the net tangible book value per share of the common stock and warrants you purchase.
The assumed offering price of the common stock offered pursuant to this prospectus is substantially higher than the net tangible book value per share of our common stock. Therefore, if you purchase shares of common stock in this offering, you will incur immediate and substantial dilution in the pro forma net tangible book value per share of common stock from the price per share that you pay for the common stock. If the holders of outstanding options or warrants exercise those options or warrants at prices below the assumed offering price, you will incur further dilution. See the section entitled “Dilution” below for a more detailed discussion of the dilution you will incur if you purchase shares in this offering.
Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gain.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We anticipate that we will retain our earnings, if any, for future growth and therefore do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the future. As a result, only appreciation of the price of our common stock will provide a return to stockholders.
You may experience future dilution as a result of future equity offerings.
In order to raise additional capital or pursue strategic acquisition opportunities, we may in the future offer additional shares of our common stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock. We cannot assure you that we will be able to sell shares or other securities in any other offering at a price per share that is equal to or greater than the price per share paid by investors in this offering, and investors purchasing shares or other securities in the future could have rights superior to existing stockholders.
The price per share at which we sell or issue additional shares of our common stock or other securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock in future transactions may be higher or lower than the price per share in this offering.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Industry DataCAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INDUSTRY DATA
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include those that express plans, anticipation, intent, contingency, goals, targets or future development and/or otherwise are not statements of historical fact. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and projections about future events and they are subject to risks and uncertainties known and unknown that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements.
In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology, such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “may,” “should,” “continue,” “could” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. Accordingly, these statements involve estimates, assumptions and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in them. Any forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the factors discussed throughout this prospectus.
You should read this prospectus and the documents that we reference herein and therein and have filed as exhibits to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is part, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is accurate as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus only. Because the risk factors referred to above could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, along with others, are described above under the heading “Risk Factors.” Further, any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict which factors will arise. In addition, we cannot assess the impact of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. We qualify all of the information presented in this prospectus, and particularly our forward-looking statements, by these cautionary statements.
This prospectus includes statistical and other industry and market data that we obtained from industry publications and research, surveys and studies conducted by third parties. Industry publications and third party research, surveys and studies generally indicate that their information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, although they do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information. While we believe these industry publications and third party research, surveys and studies are reliable, we have not independently verified such data.

Use of ProceedsUSE OF PROCEEDS
We estimate that thewill receive net proceeds of approximately $          million from our issuance andthe sale of the shares of common stock offered by us in this offering, based on an assumed public offering price of  $          per share (the last reported sale price of our common stock in this offering will be approximately $8,248,222, assuming an initial public offering price of $8.50 per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus,NASDAQ Capital Market on            , 2015), and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissionsthe placement agent fees and estimated offering expenses payable by us. If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, we estimate that the net proceeds from this offering will be approximately $9,391,642.
A $1.00Each $0.50 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of  $8.50$          per share would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering by approximately $1,085,600,$          million assuming thatthe assumed public offering price of  $          per share (the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on            , 2015), the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissionsplacement agent fees and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
We currently intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for working capital and general corporate purposes. We anticipate using the proceeds from this offering to continue to grow and invest in our business. We currently anticipate that we will use approximately 54%42% of the proceeds to invest in our sales and marketing efforts to commercialize our product, and use approximately 32%27% for general and administrative expenditures, including addressing compliance with U.S. public company requirements, such as hiring additional personnel and investing in our corporate infrastructure. The anticipated general and administrative expenditures also include payment over 25 months of $722,000 of accrued expenses owed to Dr. Murphy-Chutorian, our Chief Executive Officer (see “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions — Financings” for more information regarding these accrued expenses). We also anticipate using approximately 9%21% of the proceeds on research and development efforts and plan to use approximately 5%3% of the proceeds to acquire additional FloChec® devices for lease.
This expected use of the net proceeds from this offering represents our intentions based upon our current financial condition, results of operations, business plans and conditions. As of the date of this prospectus, we cannot predict with certainty all of the particular uses for the net proceeds to be received upon the closing of this offering or the amounts that we will actually spend on the uses set forth above. The amounts and timing of our actual expenditures may vary significantly depending on numerous factors. As a result, our management will retain broad discretion over the allocation of the net proceeds from this offering.
Pending our use of the net proceeds from this offering, we intend to invest the net proceeds in a variety of capital preservation investments, including short-term, investment grade, interest bearing instruments and U.S. government securities.

PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “SMLR.” The following table sets forth the ranges of high and low closing sales prices per share of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market for the periods indicated. Such quotations represent inter-dealer prices without retail markup, markdown or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions:
HighLow
2014
First Quarter (since February 21, 2014)$7.00$4.89
Second Quarter5.483.90
Third Quarter4.162.94
Fourth Quarter2.961.96
2015
First Quarter$6.00$1.96
Second Quarter (through May 7, 2015)$3.90$3.17
On May 7, 2015, the last reported sale price of our common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market was $3.53 per share. As of May 7, 2015, we had approximately 29 holders of record of our common stock.
28

TABLE OF CONTENTSDividend Policy
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not anticipate declaring or paying cash dividends for the foreseeable future. We are not subject to any legal restrictions respecting the payment of dividends, except that we may not pay dividends if the payment would render us insolvent. Any future determination as to the payment of cash dividends on our common stock will be at our Boardboard of Directors’directors’ discretion and will depend on our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements and other factors that our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors considers to be relevant.
29

TABLE OF CONTENTSDetermination of Offering Price
CAPITALIZATION
The following table describes our capitalization as of March 31, 2015:

on an actual basis; and

on an as adjusted basis after giving effect to the sale of our common stock in this offering at the assumed public offering price of  the$          per share of common stock has been arbitrarily determined(the last reported sale price of our common stock, as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market on            , 2015), less the estimated placement agent fees and bears no relationship to any objective criterionestimated offering expenses payable by us.
You should read this capitalization table together with “Use of value. The price does not bear any relationship to our assets, book value, historical earnings or net worth. No valuation or appraisal has been prepared for our business.Proceeds,” the financial statements and related notes included in this prospectus, as well as “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the other financial information included in this prospectus.
As of March 31, 2015
Actual
As adjusted(1)
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 4,858,517 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2015 and        shares issued and outstanding, as adjusted4,858,517
Additional paid-in capital17,829,000
Accumulated deficit(15,239)
Total stockholders’ equity2,595
Total capitalization$$
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our shares. The(1)
A $0.50 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price will be determined through negotiations betweenof  $          per share would increase (decrease) total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization on an as adjusted basis by approximately $         , assuming that the number of shares offered by us, and Aegis Capital Corp., as representative of the underwriters. The factors to be considered in determining the public offering price may include our future prospects and those of our industry in general, sales, earnings and certain of our other financial operating information in recent periods, and the market prices of securities and certain financial and operating information of companies engaged in activities similar to those we engage in. The estimated public offering price range set forth on the cover page of this preliminary prospectus, remains the same and after deducting estimated placement agent fees and estimated offering expenses payable by us. We may also increase or decrease the number of shares of common stock we are offering. Each increase of 100,000 shares in the number of shares offered by us at an assumed offering price of  $          per share would increase each of our total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization on an as adjusted basis by approximately $         . Similarly, each decrease of 100,000 shares in the number of shares offered by us at an assumed offering price of  $          per share would decrease each of our total stockholders’ equity and total capitalization on an as adjusted basis by approximately $         . The as adjusted information presented is subject toillustrative only and will change as a result of market conditionsbased on the actual offering price and other factors.terms of this offering determined at pricing.
We cannot assure you that
The preceding table excludes:

705,750 shares of common stock issuable upon the public offeringexercise of stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2015, having a weighted average exercise price will correspond toof  $1.52 per share;

50,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options issued after March 31, 2015, having an exercise price at whichof  $3.50 per share;

359,714 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants outstanding, having a weighted average exercise price of  $5.15 per share;

332,391 shares will trade inof our common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2014 stock incentive plan as of March 31, 2015 (after taking into account the public market subsequent to the offering or that an active trading market for the shares will develop and continuegrant of 50,000 options after the offering.such date).
29
30

DilutionDILUTION
If you invest in our common stock in this offering, your ownership interest will be immediately and substantially diluted to the extent of the difference between the public offering price per share of our common stock and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock after giving effect to this offering.
Our historical net tangible book value at December 31, 2013 was $(295,000), or $(0.37) per share of our common stock. Historical net tangible book value per share represents the amount of our total tangible assets less total liabilities, divided by the number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2013.
Our pro forma net tangible book value at December 31, 2013 was $(295,000), or $(0.09) per share of our common stock. Pro forma net tangible book value per share represents the amount of our total tangible assets less our total liabilities, divided by the pro forma number of shares of our common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2013, which includes 2,635,397 additional shares after giving effect to the automatic conversion of all outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock into an aggregate of 2,012,152 shares of our common stock upon the closing of this offering and the cashless exercise (at the assumed initial public offering price of $8.50 per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) of outstanding warrants for shares of convertible preferred stock resulting in the issuance of an aggregate of 623,245 shares of common stock upon exercise and subsequent conversion thereof effective upon the closing of this offering.
After giving effect to the sale of the 1,180,000 shares in this offering at the assumed initial public offering price of $8.50 per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses payable by us, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value at December 31, 2013 would have been approximately $7,953,222, or $1.73 per share. This represents an immediate increase in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value of approximately $1.82 per share to our existing stockholders, and an immediate dilution of $6.77 per share to investors purchasing shares of common stock in this offering.
Dilution in pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share represents the difference between the amount per share paid by purchasers of our common stock in this offering and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately after this offering.
The following table illustrates theNet tangible book value per share dilution to investors purchasingis determined by dividing our total tangible assets less our total liabilities by the number of shares in the offering:
 
Assumed initial public offering price per share
      $8.50 
 
Historical net tangible book value per share at December 31, 2013
  $(0.37)     
 
Increase attributable to the conversion of outstanding convertible preferred stock and cashless exercise of warrants to acquire shares of convertible preferred stock
  $0.28     
 
Pro forma net tangible book value per share at December 31, 2013
  $(0.09)     
 
Increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to new investors
  $1.82     
 
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering
      $1.73 
 
Dilution per share to new investors
      $6.77 
If the underwriter exercises its over-allotment option in full, the pro forma as adjustedof common stock outstanding. Our historical net tangible book value will increase toas of March 31, 2015 was approximately $1.90          million, or $          per share, representing an immediate dilution of $6.60share.
Dilution per share to new investors assuming thatrepresents the initial public offering price will be $8.50difference between the amount per share which ispaid by purchasers of shares of common stock in this offering and the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus.

A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price of $8.50 per share would increase (decrease) the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value by $1,085,600, the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share by $0.24of common stock immediately after completion of this offering. After giving effect to the sale of the common stock in this offering at an assumed public offering price of  $          per share, which is the last reported sale price of our common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market on            , 2015, and after deducting the dilution in pro formaestimated placement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses payable by us, our as adjusted net tangible book value as of March 31, 2015 would have been $          million, or $          per share. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of  $          per share to existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of  $          per share to investors participating in this offering, as illustrated in the following table:
Assumed public offering price per share$
Historical net tangible book value per share as of March 31, 2015$
Increase in as-adjusted net tangible book value per share attributable to new investors$
As adjusted net tangible book value per share after this offering$
Dilution per share to investors participating in this offering$
Each $0.50 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price of  $          per share, which is the last reported sale price of our common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market on            , 2015, would increase (decrease) the as adjusted net tangible book value by $0.24approximately $          million, or approximately $          per share, and increase (decrease) the dilution per share to new investors by approximately $          per share, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us and without taking into account the change in number of shares that will be issued upon cashless exercise of our warrants at the new price.
The following table summarizes, on a pro forma as adjusted basis as of December 31, 2013, the differences between the number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the total consideration and the average price per share paid by existing stockholders and by investors participating in this offering, before deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, at an assumed initial public offering price of $8.50 per share, the midpoint of the price range shown on the cover page of this prospectus.
   Shares Purchased  Total Consideration  
Average Price
Per Share
 
   Number  Percentage  Amount  Percentage 
 
Existing stockholders
   3,422,147   74%  $8,982,721   47%  $2.62 
 
New investors
   1,180,000   26%  $10,030,000   53%  $8.50 
 
Total
   4,602,147   100%  $19,012,721   100%  $4.13 
Our Chief Executive Officer and Director, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian, has indicated an interest in purchasing up to 34,500 shares of our common stock in this offering at the initial public offering price. See “Underwriting” for a full description of compensation payable to the underwriters.

Capitalization
The following table sets forth our capitalization, as of December 31, 2013:
  • on an actual basis;
  • on a pro forma basis to give effect to the issuance of 2,635,397 shares of common stock upon the closing of this offering, which reflects (i) the automatic conversion of all such outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock into an aggregate of 2,012,152 shares of our common stock and (ii) the issuance of an aggregate of 623,245 shares of common stock as result of the cashless exercise at the assumed initial public offering price of $8.50 per share (the mid-point of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) of outstanding warrants for convertible preferred stock and the automatic conversion of such convertible preferred stock into common stock;
  • on a pro forma as adjusted basis to give further effect to the sale of the 1,180,000 shares of our common stock in this offering at the assumed initial public offering price of $8.50 per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissionsplacement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses payable by us.
An increase of 100,000 shares in the number of shares offered by us would increase the as adjusted net tangible book value by approximately $          million, or $          per share, and the dilution per share to new investors would be approximately $          per share, assuming that the assumed public offering price remains the same and after deducting the estimated placement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses payable by us. Similarly, a decrease of 100,000 shares in the number of shares offered by us would decrease the as adjusted net tangible book value by approximately $          million, or approximately $          per share, and the dilution per share to new investors would be approximately $          per share, assuming that the assumed public offering price remains the same and after deducting the estimated placement agent fees and other estimated offering expenses payable by us. The as adjusted information discussed above is illustrative only and will adjust based on the actual public offering price and other terms of this offering determined at pricing.
The foregoing calculations exclude the following shares as of March 31, 2015:

705,750 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2015, having a weighted average exercise price of  $1.52 per share;

50,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options issued after March 31, 2015, having an exercise price of  $3.50 per share;

359,714 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants outstanding, having a weighted average exercise price of  $5.15 per share;

332,391 shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under our 2014 stock incentive plan as of March 31, 2015 (after taking into account the grant of 50,000 options after such date).
You
31

Furthermore, we may choose to raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities due to market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. We may also choose to engage in strategic acquisitions through the issuance of shares of our stock. New investors will experience further dilution if any of our outstanding options or warrants are exercised, new options are issued and exercised under our equity incentive plans or we issue additional shares of common stock, other equity securities or convertible debt securities in the future.
32

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should consider this tablebe read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes to those financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
   
As of December 31, 2013
 
   Actual  Pro Forma  
Pro Forma
As
Adjusted
 
 
Stockholders’ equity:
             
 
Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per share:
                
 
Series A Preferred Stock
  $6,020,000  $0  $0 
 
Series A-1 Preferred Stock
   482,000   0   0 
 
Series A-2 Preferred Stock
   208,000   0   0 
 
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
   1,000   3,000   5,000 
 
Additional paid-in capital
   2,346,000   9,054,000   17,300,222 
 
Accumulated deficit
   (9,352,000)   (9,352,000)   (9,352,000) 
 
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
  $(295,000)  $(295,000)  $7,953,222 
A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public offering price of $8.50 per share would increase or decrease each of cash and cash equivalents, additional paid-in capital, total stockholders’ deficit on a pro forma as adjusted basis by approximately $1,085,600, assuming that the number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read together with our financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements reflecting our current expectations that involve significant risks and uncertainties. See “Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those discussed in our forward-looking statements asAs a result of many factors, includingsuch as those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus.prospectus, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Please refer to the discussion under the heading “Forward-Looking Statements” above.
Overview
We are an emerging medical risk-assessment company. Our mission is to develop, manufacture and market patented products that identify the risk profile of medical patients to allowassist healthcare providers to capture full reimbursement potential for their services.in monitoring patients and evaluating chronic diseases. Our first patented and U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA cleared product, is FloChec®. FloChec™FloChec® is used in the office setting to allow providers to measure arterial blood flow in the extremities and is a useful tool for internists and primary care physicians for whom it was previously impractical to conduct blood flow measurements. WeOur product initially received FDA 510(k) clearance for FloChecin February 2010, we began Beta testing it in the third quarter of 2010, and began commercially leasing FloChecit in January 2011. In the year ended December 31, 2013March 2015 we had total revenue of $2,274,000 and a net loss of $2,233,000 compared to total revenue of $1,199,000 and a net loss of $2,741,000 in 2012. Our net loss attributable to common stockholders was $2,233,000received FDA 510(k) clearance for the year ended December 31, 2013 comparednext generation version. In March 2015 we also launched our multi-test platform, WellChec™, to $2,826,000perform risk assessments for our customers. We believe the year ended December 31, 2012.combination of our proprietary risk assessment product, FloChec®, and our multi-test service platform, WellChec™, position us to provide valuable health risk assessment tools to our insurance company and physician customers, which in turn permit them to guide patient care and close the gap between the cost of patient care and compensation for providing that care.
Sources of Revenues and Expenses
Revenue
We generate revenue primarily from the rental or license of our FloChec® system to our customers. We expect physicians and other providers that uselicense FloChec® to provide a recurring source of revenue during the leaselicense term. We recognize revenue from the rentallicensing of our FloChec® product as earned, on a month-to-month basis. FloChec™ rentals® licences are billed at the rates established in our leasecustomer agreements. We recognize revenue for providing service on a per test basis to customers, as earned, on a month-to-month basis.
Cost of revenue
Our cost of revenue consists primarily of four components: the depreciation expense of our FloChec™ FloChec®systems for lease; the write-off of the residual value of FloChec® systems retired from active leasing; manufacturing oversight personnel costs; and other miscellaneous items, such as freight, that are not directly related to FloChec® production. Each FloChec™FloChec® unit has a depreciation schedule based on the cost of the unit. The cost of each unit is depreciated on a straightline basis over 36 months. Each unit has its own cost of production, which varies from time to time. We believe that the cost of each unit is a function of manufacturing efficiencies, supply costs and fixed overhead expense as affected by volume of units produced, which change from time to time. When costscost of production is lower, the new units have a lower monthly depreciation and decrease the average depreciation per unit per month, which means our cost of revenue is lower. Similary,Similarly, if cost of production is higher, the new units will have a higher monthly depreciation and increase the average depreciation per unit per month, which means our cost of revenue is higher. We believe growth in the number of monthly depreciation charges is predominately due to our sales and marketing efforts, which add new customers to an established customer base. The retirement of units from active leasing is primarily a function of the aggregate number of FloChec™FloChec® units rented and the occurrence from time to time of system upgrades. The other costs of revenue vary primarily as a function of the aggregate number of FloChec® units rented and changes in operations such as manufacturing, delivery or maintenance.
33

Engineering and product development expense
Our engineering and product development expense consists of costs associated with the design, development, testing and enhancement of our FloChec® product and other products in development. We also include salaries and related employee benefits, research-related overhead expenses and fees paid to external service providers in our engineering and product development expense.

Sales and marketing expense
Our sales and marketing expense consists primarily of sales commissions and support costs, salaries and related employee benefits, travel, education, trade show and marketing costs.
General and administrative expense
Our general and administrative expense consists primarily of salaries and related employee benefits, professional service fees, associated travel costs and depreciation and amortization expense.
Total other income (expense)
Our total other income (expense) primarily reflects other taxes and fees as well as interest income and expense.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures in the financial statements. Critical accounting policies are those accounting policies that may be material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change, and that have a material impact on financial condition or operating performance. While we base our estimates and judgments on our experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies used in the preparation of our financial statements require significant judgments and estimates. For additional information relating to these and other accounting policies, see Note 23 to our audited financial statements, appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue for renting our FloChec® product to customers or for providing service on a per test basis to customers, as earned, on a month-to-month basis. FloChec® rent isor per test charges are billed at our established rates.
Stock-Based Compensation
We recognize compensation expense in an amount equal to the estimated grant date fair value of each option grant, or stock award over the estimated period of service and vesting. This estimation of the fair value of each stock-based grant or issuance on the date of grant involves numerous assumptions by management. Although we calculate the fair value under the Black Scholes option pricing model, which is a standard option pricing model, this model still requires the use of numerous assumptions, including, among others, the expected life (turnover), volatility of the underlying equity security, a risk free interest rate and expected dividends. The model and assumptions also attempt to account for changing employee behavior as the stock price changes and capture the observed pattern of increasing rates of exercise as the stock price increases. The use of different values by management in connection with these assumptions in the Black Scholes option pricing model could produce substantially different results. As of December 31, 2013, all outstanding stock options are fully vested.
Accounting for Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes result primarily from temporary differences between financial and tax reporting. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statement basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. Future tax benefits are subject to a
34

valuation allowance when management is unable to conclude that our deferred tax assets will more-likely-than-not be realized from the results of operations. Our estimate for the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets requires management to make significant estimates and judgments about projected future operating results. If actual results differ from these projections or if management’s expectations of future results change, it may be necessary to adjust the valuation allowance.

Emerging Growth Company Elections
The JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company, such as our company, can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of these accounting standards until they would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to avail ourselves of this exemption. As a result, our financial statements may not be comparable to other public companies that comply with public company effective dates. In the future, we may elect to opt out of the extended period for adopting new accounting standards. If we do so, we would need to disclose such decision and it would be irrevocable.
Factors Affecting Future Results
We have not identified any factors that have a recurring effect that are necessary to understand period to period comparisons as appropriate, nor any one-time events that have an effect on the financials. Also, given our relatively limited operating history, we have not yet identified any seasonality.
Results of Operations
YearThree Months Ended DecemberMarch 31, 20132015 Compared to YearThree Months Ended DecemberMarch 31, 20122014
Three months ended March 31,
20152014
(unaudited)
Revenue$1,202$837
Operating expenses:
Cost of revenue220155
Engineering and product development309229
Sales and marketing1,228746
General and administrative793497
Total operating expenses2,5501,627
Loss from operations(1,348)(790)
Other expense:
Interest expense(24)(26)
Other income(1)
Other expense(24)(27)
Net loss$(1,372)$(817)
Revenue
We had revenue of  $2,274,000$1,202,000 for the yearthree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2013,2015, an increase of  $1,075,000,$365,000, or 90%44%, compared to $1,199,000$837,000 in the same period in 2014. Our revenue is primarily generated from leasing of our FloChec®2012. systems, although we recently launched our WellChec™ platform, and this also accounted for some of our revenues in the first quarter. We invoicerecognize rental revenue monthly for each unit installed with a customer. The average amount recognized each month per invoiceunit of product in the field is affected by the mix of units rented by direct customers or distributors, by price changes and by discounts. The primary reasonsreason for the increase in revenue werewas that the total number of installed units in the field generating monthly invoicesrevenue grew 83% and33%, partially offset by the average amount of revenue recognized per invoice grew 4%unit which decreased
35

slightly as compared to 2012. 2014. We believe that growth in the number of monthly invoices is predominately due to our sales and marketing efforts, which add new customers to an established customer base. Change in the average amount of revenue recognized per unit was due to changes in the mix of customers renting units. We recognized $96,000 of revenue from providing testing services through our WellChec™ platform during the three months ended March 31, 2015.
Operating expenses
We had total operating expenses of  $4,398,000$2,550,000 for the yearthree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2013,2015, an increase of  $784,000,$923,000, or 22%57%, compared to $3,614,000$1,627,000 in 2012.the same period in 2014. The primary reasonreasons for the increase waswere increased general and administrative expense, sales and marketing expense.expense, engineering and product development expense, and cost of revenue. The changes in the various components of our operating expenses are described below.
Cost of revenue
We had cost of revenue of  $469,000$220,000 for the yearthree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2013,2015, an increase of $105,000,$65,000, or 29%42%, from $364,000 $155,000 for 2012.the same period in 2014. The primary reasonsreason for the increase werewas $37,000 of additional cost associated with employees who oversee manufacturing operations. A portion of the increase is also due to the fact that aggregate depreciation of our FloChec® systems for lease increased $59,000,$10,000, or 83%21%, in 2013 the first quarter of 2015 compared to 2012 the same period in 2014 as there was an 83% a 34% increase in the number of monthly depreciation charges corresponding to the 83%37% increase in the number of installed units in the field generating monthly rental invoices. Averagerevenue, partially offset by a decrease in average depreciation per unit per month was unchanged. In addition, in 2013 we hired an employee to oversee manufacturing operations at a total cost of $94,000.9%. Other cost of revenue items, such as freight and other miscellaneous items, which are not associated with FloChec® system production, were $30,000$9,000 higher in 2013 compared to 2012, which was partially offset by $79,000 lessand cost of units that were retired. There was a system upgraderetired were $9,000 higher in 2012 that was responsible for more units retiredthe first quarter of 2015 compared to the same period in that year.2014.
Engineering and product development expense
We had engineering and product development expense of  $356,000$309,000 for the yearthree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2013,2015, an increase of  $79,000,$80,000, or 29%35%, compared to $277,000$229,000 in 2012.the same period in 2014. The increase was primarily due to increased consulting costs,salary expense of  $162,000, and increased clinical study expense of $50,000, which were partially offset by lower costconsulting costs for new product development of  product development.$132,000.
Sales and marketing expense
We had sales and marketing expense of  $2,256,000$1,228,000 for the yearthree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2013,2015, an increase of  $538,000,$482,000, or 31%65%, compared to $1,718,000$746,000 in 2012.the same period in 2014. The primary reasons for the increase in sales and marketing expense were $231,000 higher sales commissions associated with higher rental revenue, $220,000 was primarily due to higher salary expense and $70,000 in higher trade show expensesof  $443,000 associated with having an expanded sales team as compared to the prior year.period, higher other expenses of  $50,000, higher travel expense of  $34,000, higher facility expense of $31,000, higher stock compensation expense of  $15,000, and higher trade show expense of  $9,000, partially offset by lower sales commissions of  $100,000, as compared to the same period in 2014.

General and administrative expense
We had general and administrative expense of  $1,317,000$793,000 for the yearthree months ended DecemberMarch 31 2013, 2015, an increase of  $62,000,$296,000, or 5%60%, compared to $1,255,000$497,000 in the same period in 2012.2014. The increase was primarily due to an increase in uncollectible accounts, as well as increasedhigher salaries and fees for employees, directors, and consultants of  $168,000, higher medical device excise tax, state and local tax, audit and tax preparation expense of  $63,000, higher insurance premiums of $44,000, added costs associated with being a publicly traded company of  $27,000, higher stock compensation expense associated with accelerating the vesting of  stock options as compared to 2012,$15,000 and the additionhigher other expenses of  the medical device excise tax,$3,000, which increases were partially offset by lower patent and legal expenses of  $24,000.
Other expense
We had other expense of  $24,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2015, a decrease of  $3,000, or 11%, compared to $27,000 in the same period in 2014. The decrease was due to lower interest expense of $2,000, which, as described in Note 6 to the financial statements included elsewhere in this report, resulted from early retirement of leases and the associated retirement of deferred financing costs.
36

Net loss
For the foregoing reasons, we had a net loss of  $1,372,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2015, an increase of  $555,000, or 68%, compared to a net loss of  $817,000 for the same period in 2014.
Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013
For the year ended December 31,
20142013
Revenue$3,635$2,274
Operating expenses:
Cost of revenue692469
Engineering and product development1,113356
Sales and marketing3,7232,256
General and administrative2,4481,317
Total operating expenses7,9764,398
Loss from operations(4,341)(2,124)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(175)(108)
Other income (expense)1(1)
Other expense(174)(109)
Net loss$(4,515)$(2,233)
Revenue
We had revenue of  $3,635,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of  $1,361,000, or 59.9%, compared to $2,274,000 in 2013. Our revenue is primarily generated from leasing of our FloChec® systems. We recognize rental revenue monthly for each unit installed with a customer. The average amount recognized each month per unit of product in the field is affected by the mix of units rented by direct customers or distributors, by price changes and by discounts. The primary reason for the increase in revenue was that the total number of installed units in the field generating monthly revenue grew 57.6%, and the average amount of revenue recognized per unit grew 1.4% compared to 2013. We believe that growth in the number of monthly invoices is predominately due to our sales and marketing efforts, which add new customers to an established customer base. Growth in the average amount of revenue recognized per unit was due to changes in the mix of customers renting units.
Operating expenses
We had total operating expenses of  $7,976,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of $3,578,000, or 81.4%, compared to $4,398,000 in 2013. The primary reason for the increase were increased general and administrative expense, sales and marketing expense, engineering and product development expense, and cost of revenue. The changes in the various components of our operating expenses are described below.
Cost of revenue
We had cost of revenue of  $692,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of  $223,000, or 47.5%, from $469,000 for 2013. The primary reason for the increase was $253,000 of additional cost in 2014 associated with employees who oversee manufacturing operations, which persons were not employed or employed for a short period in the prior year. A portion of the increase is also due to the fact that aggregate depreciation of our FloChec® systems for lease increased $65,000, or 49.8%, in 2014 compared to 2013 as there was a 57.6% increase in the number of monthly depreciation charges corresponding to the 57.6% increase in number of installed units in the field generating monthly revenue, partially offset by a decrease in
37

average depreciation per unit per month of 5.0%. These increases were partially offset by other cost of revenue items, such as freight and other miscellaneous items, which were $24,000 lower, and cost of units that were retired, which were $70,000 lower, in 2014 compared to 2013.
Engineering and product development expense
We had engineering and product development expense of  $1,113,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of  $757,000, or 212.6%, compared to $356,000 in 2013. The increase was primarily due to higher consulting costs for new product development of  $647,000, higher salaries of  $136,000 and other expenses of  $3,000, partially offset by lower costs of  $25,000 for clinical studies
Sales and marketing expense
We had sales and marketing expense of  $3,723,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of  $1,467,000, or 65.0%, compared to $2,256,000 in 2013. The increase was primarily due to higher salary expense of  $1,308,000 associated with having an expanded sales team as compared to the prior period, higher travel expenses of  $203,000, and higher sales commissions of  $31,000, partially offset by $17,000 in lower stock compensation expense, $60,000 in lower trade show and other expenses. During the year, we primarily focused sales activity on insurance plans with Medicare Advantage members. Accordingly, we incurred costs associated with establishing these relationships prior to generating any product revenue.
General and administrative expense
We had general and administrative expense of  $2,448,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of  $1,131,000, or 85.9%, compared to $1,317,000 in the same period in 2013. The increase was primarily due to added costs associated with being a publicly traded company of  $299,000; higher salaries and fees for employees, directors, and consultants.consultants of  $296,000; higher patent and legal expenses of $138,000; medical device excise tax, state and local tax, audit and tax preparation expenses of  $120,000; higher insurance premiums of  $117,000; higher stock compensation expense of  $67,000; an increase in uncollectible accounts of  $38,000; higher travel costs of  $23,000; and higher merchant fees and other expenses of  $31,000.
Other expense
We had other expense of  $174,000 for 2014, an increase of  $65,000, or 59.6%, compared to $109,000 in 2013. The increase was primarily due to higher interest expense of  $66,000. As described in Note 6 to the audited financial statements, early retirement of leases associated with the opening of a new line of credit, resulted in acceleration of the expensing of deferred financing costs.
Net loss
For the foregoing reasons, we had a net loss of  $2,233,000$4,515,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013, a decrease2014, an increase of  $508,000,$2,282,000, or 19%102.2%, compared to a net loss of  $2,741,000$2,233,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012, and had a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $2,233,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $2,826,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012.2013.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We had cash and restricted cash equivalents of  $734,000$5,161,000 at March 31, 2015 compared to $6,256,000 at December 31, 2013 compared to $731,000 at December 31, 2012,2014, and total current liabilities of  $1,856,000$3,808,000 at DecemberMarch 31, 20132015 compared to $1,179,000$4,064,000 at December 31, 2012.2014. As of March 31, 2015 we had working capital of approximately $1,853,000. Restricted cash of  $2,100,000 at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 20132014 is deposited in a cash collateral account to secure our revolving credit line, see “— Description of Indebtedness” below. On February 26, 2014, we hadclosed the initial public offering of our common stock, pursuant to which we sold an aggregate 1,430,000 shares of our common stock at a working capital deficitprice to the public of  $7.00 per share, and received gross proceeds of approximately $847,000.$10,010,000 before deducting placement agent fees and other offering expenses. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, we sold an aggregate 117,500 shares of our common stock to Mr. William H.C. Chang, an accredited investor and significant stockholder, pursuant to separate stock purchase
38

agreements for an aggregate cash purchase price of  $498,600. Subsequent to the close of the quarter, we issued and sold an aggregate of 143,000 shares of our common stock to an accredited investor, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement for an aggregate cash purchase price of  $500,500.
We have incurred recurring losses since inception and expect to continue to incur losses as a result of costs and expenses related to our marketing and other promotional activities, research and continued development of our FloChec® product. Our principal sources of cash have included the issuance of equity, primarily our February 2014 initial public offering of common stock, as well as other private placements of our shares, and to a lesser extent, borrowings under loan agreements. We expect that as our revenues grow, our operating expenses will continue to grow and, as a result, we will need to generate significant additional net revenues to achieve profitability. We believe thatBased on our currently available cash, we do not have adequate cash on hand plus cash fromto cover our operating activities will be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next 12 months. However, if we do not generate sufficient cash from operating activities, our cash on hand will not be sufficient to fund our operationsanticipated expenses for the next 12 months. For this reason, our independent registered public accountants’ report for the year ended December 31, 2013 includes2014 included an explanatory paragraph that expresses substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a “going concern.” This doubt continues to exist.
Although we do not have any current capital commitments, we expect that we will increase our expenditures following completion of this offering once we have additional capital on hand in order to continue our efforts to grow our business and commercialize FloChec™.products and services. Accordingly, following completion of the offering, we currently expect to make additional expenditures in both sales and marketing, as well as general and administrative to address the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and invest in our corporate infrastructure. We also expect to invest in our research and development efforts. However, weWe do not have any definitive plans as to the exact amounts or particular uses at this time, and the exact amounts and timing of any expendituresexpenditure may vary signficantlysignificantly from our current intentions. See ‘‘Use of Proceeds’’However, in order to execute on our business plan, and ‘‘Risk Factors — Wegiven our current available cash, we anticipate that we will need to raise additional capital. There is no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed or that management will be able to obtain financing on acceptable terms or whether or not we will generate sufficient revenues to become profitable and have broad discretion in the use of the net proceeds from this offeringpositive operating cash flow. If we are unable to raise sufficient additional funds when necessary, we may need to curtail making additional expenditures and may not use them effectively.’’could be required to scale back our business plans, or make other changes until sufficient additional capital is raised to support further operations. There can be no assurance that such a plan will be successful.
Operating activities
We used $1,192,000$1,503,000 of net cash in operating activities for the yearthree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2013.2015. Non-cash adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities plus changes in operating assets and liabilities used $131,000 of cash in the three months ended March 31, 2015. These non-cash adjustments primarily reflect cash provided by depreciation of  $59,000, allowance for doubtful accounts of $51,000, stock-based compensation expense of  $33,000, loss on disposal of assets for lease of  $25,000 and amortization of deferred financing costs of  $18,000 offset by cash used in operating activities primarily from accrued expenses of  $137,000, deferred revenue of  $119,000, trade accounts receivable of  $52,000, and prepaid expenses and other current assets of  $9,000.
For the same period in 2014, we used $1,026,000 of cash in operating activities. Non-cash adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities plus changes in operating assets and liabilities provided $1,041,000used $209,000 of cash in the yearthree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2013.2014. These non-cash adjustments primarily reflect cash provided by allowance for doubtful accounts of  $50,000, depreciation of  $47,000, amortization of deferred revenue, accrued expenses, accounts payablefinancing costs of  $23,000, and stock-based compensation expense, slightly offset by higher trade accounts receivable.
We used $1,584,000loss on disposal of net cash in operating activitiesassets for the year ended December 31, 2012. Non-cash adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cashlease of  $16,000. Cash provided by operating activities plus changesin the three months ended March 31, 2014 were primarily from accrued expenses of  $58,000 and trade accounts receivable of  $21,000, offset by cash used in operating activities primarily due to prepaid expenses and other current assets of  $176,000, deferred revenue of $132,000, and liabilities provided $1,157,000trade accounts payable of  cash in the year ended December 31, 2012. These adjustments primarily reflect accrued expenses, a provision for non-payment of long-term notes receivable – related party, stock based compensation expense, and amortization of deferred financing costs.$116,000.
Investing activities
We used $441,000$90,000 of net cash in investing activities for the yearthree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2013,2015, primarily for purchases of our FloChec™ systemsassets for lease.

We used $618,000$120,000 of net cash in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2012, reflecting the loan extended to Semler HealthPerks, Inc., as well as the purchasesame period in 2014, primarily for purchases of our FloChec™ systemsassets for lease.
39

Financing activities
We generated $1,636,000$498,000 in net cash from financing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2015 due to the sale of shares of our common stock. We generated $8,024,000 of net cash from financing activities during the yearthree months ended DecemberMarch 31, 2013,2014, primarily from proceeds from salesthe sale of shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and warrants to acquirecommon stock in our Series A Preferred Stock in the third quarter,February 2014 initial public offering, which proceeds were partially offset by offering costs and payment of the current portion of our long-term liabilities.
We generated $2,905,000 of net cash from financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily from sales of equity, offset by offering costs and payment of current portion of long-term liabilities.
Description of Indebtedness
On September 30, 2014 we entered into a revolving credit line with First Republic Bank. We currently have no material outstanding indebtedness. may borrow up to $2,000,000 for a 12-month term at a variable annual interest rate based on First Republic’s Prime less a spread of 2.0% p.a. The initial interest rate is 1.25% p.a. We agreed to make monthly payments consisting of  $2,000 of interest, and an annual payment consisting of  $2,000,000 principal plus any accrued by unpaid interest. The line of credit agreement provides for customary events of default and is secured by a collateral cash account at First Republic. As of March 31, 2015, we had borrowed $2,000,000 under the revolving line of credit.
See Note 76 to our audited financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus for description of our outstanding indebtedness.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of each of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2013 and 2012,2014, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Commitments and Contingencies
As of each of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2013 and 2012,2014, other than employment/consulting agreements with key executive officers and our facilities lease obligation, we had no material commitments other than the liabilities reflected in our financial statements.
JOBS Act
In April 2012, the JOBS Act was enacted. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. Thus, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected to avail ourselves of this extended transition period, and, as a result, we will not adopt new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for other public companies.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In connection with the audits of our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, our management and independent registered public accounting firm identified certain material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. These material weaknesses related to our lack of a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of knowledge and experience in the application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, commensurate with our financial reporting requirements and the fact that policies and procedures with respect to the review, supervision, and monitoring of our accounting and reporting functions were either not designed and in place or not operating effectively. As a result, numerous audit adjustments to our financial statements were identified during the course of the audit. Our management and independent registered public accounting firm did not perform an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting as of either December 31, 2013 or 2012 in accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Had we and our independent registered public accounting firm performed an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, additional control deficiencies may have been identified by management or our independent registered public accounting firm, and those control deficiencies could have also represented one or more material weaknesses.
In an effort to remediate these material weaknesses, soon after the closing of the initial public offering, we intend to increase the number of our finance and accounting personnel, including hiring a Chief Financial Officer with public company experience. Assessing our procedures to improve our internal control

over financial reporting is an ongoing process. We are currently not required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and are therefore not required to make an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. As a result, our management did not perform an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 or 2012. Further, our independent registered public accounting firm has not been engaged to express, nor have they expressed, an opinion on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. We currently do not have an internal audit function.

BUSINESS
Business
GeneralOverview
We are an emerging medical risk-assessment company. Our mission is to develop, manufacture and market patented products that identify the risk profile of medical patients to allowassist healthcare providers to capture full reimbursement potential for their services.in monitoring patients and evaluating chronic diseases. Our first patented and U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA cleared product, is FloChec®. FloChec™FloChec® is used in the office setting to allow providers to measure arterial blood flow in the extremities and is a useful tool for internists and primary care physicians for whom it was previously impractical to conduct blood flow measurements. FloChecOur product initially received FDA 510(k) clearance in February 2010, we began Beta testing it in the third quarter of 2010, and we began commercially leasing FloChecit in January 2011. In the year ended December 31, 2013March 2015 we had total revenue of $2,274,000 and a net loss of $2,233,000 compared to total revenue of $1,199,000 and a net loss of $2,741,000, in 2012. Our net loss attributable to common stockholders was $2,233,000received FDA 510(k) clearance for the year ended December 31, 2013 comparednext generation version. In March 2015 we also launched our multi-test platform, WellChec™, to $2,826,000perform risk assessments for our customers. We believe the year ended December 31, 2012.combination of our proprietary risk assessment product, FloChec®, and our multi-test service platform, WellChec™, position us to provide valuable health risk assessment tools to our insurance company and physician customers, which in turn permit them to guide patient care and close the gap between the cost of patient care and compensation for providing that care.
Our Product
We currently have only one patented and FDA clearedFDA-cleared product, FloChec®, that we market and lease license to our customers. FloChec® is a four-minute in-office blood flow test. Healthcare providers can use blood flow measurements as part of their examinations of a patient’s vascular condition, including assessments of patients who have vascular disease. The following diagram illustrates the use of FloChec®:
[MISSING IMAGE: t1300651_flocheclr-col.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: t1501090_flochec.jpg]
FloChec® features a sensor clamp that is placed on the toe or finger much like current pulse oximetry devices. Infrared light emitted from the clamp on the dorsal surface of the digit is scattered and reflected by the red blood cells coursing through the area of illumination. Returning light is ‘sensed’ by the sensor. A blood flow waveform is instantaneously constructed by our proprietary software algorithm and displayed on the video monitor. Both index fingers and both large toes are interrogated, which takes about 30 seconds for each. A hardcopy report form is generated that displays four waveforms and the ratio of each leg measurement compared with the arms. Results are classified as Flow Obstruction Borderline Flow Obstruction andor No Flow Obstruction.
We have developed a servicelicense model rather than an outright sales model for FloChec®. Our service license model pricing is based on data collected on use rates of FloChec® and third-party payment rates to physicians and facilities using our product. The pricing model eliminates the need to make a capital equipment sale. Consequently, we currently require no down payment, long-term commitment or maintenance contract or fees from our customers. We replace damaged products free of charge in the servicelicense model. FloChec® has an expected average lifetime of at least three years. We intend to reevaluate the monthly price periodically in consideration of the revenue generation associated with FloChec®. To date, we roughly estimatedestimate that routine office usage of the FloChec® has ranged from a few tests per week up to 10tests per day.

tests per day. We are currently pilot testing a model in which we invoice on a per test basis for use of FloChec®, and recently launched our WellChec™ multi-test platform, where we or our sub-contractor may perform other non-proprietary tests alongside FloChec®.
Our Chairman and co-founder, Dr. Herbert Semler, is an inventor of the technology behind FloChec®. Dr. Semler formed Semler Scientific, Inc.,our company in 2007 to further develop, patent and commercialize his idea. We applied for our patent protecting our proprietary technology in 2007 and U.S. Patent No. 7,628,760 was granted in 2009. FloChec® initially received FDA 510(k) clearance in February 2010, and we began Beta testing it in the third quarter of 2010, and we began commercially leasing FloChec® in January 2011. In March 2015, we received FDA 510(k) clearance of the next generation version. We have placed our FloChec® product with cardiologists, internists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, podiatrists and family practitioners.practitioners and four insurance plans among the top 15 plans with the most Medicare Advantage members. Many of the 50 years or older patients under the care of these physicians have cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes, cigarette smoking, high cholesterol or hypertension that lead to the development of peripheral arterial disease, or PAD.
Other Methods
Blood flow is the amount of blood delivered to a given region per unit time, whereas a blood pressure is the force exerted by circulating blood on the walls of arteries. Given a fixed resistance, blood flow and blood pressure are proportional. The traditional ankle brachial index, or ABI, with Doppler test uses a blood pressure cuff to measure the the systolic blood pressure in the lower legs and in the arms. A blood pressure cuff is inflated proximal to the artery in question. Using a Doppler device, the inflation continues until the pulse in the artery ceases. The blood pressure cuff is then slowly deflated. When the artery’s pulse is re-detected through the Doppler probe the pressure in the cuff at that moment indicates the systolic pressure of that artery. The test is repeated on all four extremities. Well-established criteria for the ratio of the blood pressure in a leg compared to the blood pressure in the arms are used to assess the presence or absence of flow obstruction. Generally these tests take 15 minutes to perform and require a vascular technician to be done properly. Like FloChec®, the traditional analog ABI test with Doppler is a non-invasive physiologic measurement that may be abnormal in the presence of peripheral artery disease, or PAD. Alternatively, primary care physicians may palpate the pedal pulses to assess blood flow in the lower extremities. However, pulse palpation is generally not sensitive for the detection of vascular disease. Other options to detect arterial obstructions are imaging systems that use ultrasound, x-ray technology or magnetic resonance to obtain anatomic information about blood vessels in the legs. However, as compared to FloChec®, imaging tests are much more expensive tests that are performed by specialists in special laboratories or offices.
Market Opportunity
In March 2010, President Obama signed into lawThe Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, or collectively, the Health Care Reform Law, awas signed in March 2010. This sweeping law is intended to broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of healthcare spending, enhance remedies against fraud and abuse, add new transparency requirements for the healthcare and health insurance industries, impose new taxes and fees on the health industry and impose additional health policy reforms. This legislation includes reforms and reductions that could affecthave affected Medicare reimbursements and health insurance coverage for certain services and treatments. The Health Care Reform Law has brought a new way of doing business for providers and health insurance plans. We believe that fee-for-service programs will be reduced in favor of capitated programs that pay a monthly fee per patient.
Fee-for-service is a payment model where services are unbundled and paid for separately. In health care, it gives an incentive for physicians to provide more treatments because payment is dependent on the quantity of care, rather than quality of care. Capitation is a payment arrangement that pays a physician or group of physicians a set amount for each enrolled person assigned to them, per period of time, whether or not that person seeks care. The amount of remuneration is based on the average expected health carehealthcare utilization of that patient, with greater payment for patients with significant medical history. For Medicare Advantage patients, CMS pays thea fee per patient.patient, also known as capitation. CMS uses risk adjustment to adjust capitation payments to health plans, either higher or lower, to account for the differences in expected health costs of individuals. Accordingly, under CMS guidelines, risk factor adjustments per patient will provide payment that is higher for sicker patients who have conditions that are codified. Accordingly, there
42

is a financial incentive to identify those Medicare Advantage patients that are sicker, including those that have undiagnosed ailments such as PAD.
The coding system used by CMS for the Medicare Advantage program is a hierarchical condition category, or HCC, diagnostic classification system that begins by classifying over 14,000 diagnosis codes into 805 diagnostic groups, or DXGs. Each code maps to exactly one DXG, which represents a well-specified medical condition, such as DXG 96.01 precerebral or cerebral arterial occlusion with infarction. DXGs are further aggregated into 189 condition categories, or CCs. CCs describe a broader set of similar diseases. Diseases within a CC are related clinically and with

respect to cost. An example is CC96 Ischemic or Unspecified Stroke, which includes DXGs 96.01 and 96.02 acute but ill-defined cerebrovascular disease.Wedisease. We believe that quality of care measured by completeness and wellness will induce higher payments per patient. These changes are already in place for the approximately 1416 million participants in the Medicare Advantage program and are expected to expand to more types of insured patients as healthcare reform is deployed.
Undiagnosed vascular disease of the legs has been called a major under-diagnosed health problem in the United States by the National Institute of Health and the Wall Street Journal. We believe vascular disease in leg arteries is undiagnosed in 75% of cases, which is about 12 million Americans. Known as peripheral artery disease, or PAD, this condition is a common and deadly cardiovascular disease that is often undiagnosed. PAD develops when the arteries in the legs become clogged with plaque — fatty deposits — that limit blood flow to the legs. As with clogged arteries in the heart, clogged arteries in the legs place patients at an increased risk of heart attack and stroke. Published studies have shown that persons with PAD are four times more likely to die of heart attack, and two-three times more likely to die of stroke. According to a study by P.G. Steg published in the JAMA, patients with PAD have a 21% event rate of cardiovascular death, heart attack, stroke or cardiovascular hospitalization within 12 months. The SAGE Group has estimated that as many as 18 million people are affected with PAD in the United States alone and A.T. Hirsch et al. in a JAMA published article further estimate that only 11% have claudication (pain on exertion), a classic symptom of PAD. One can lower the risks associated with PAD if the disease is detected, with early detection providing the greatest benefit.
Many people affected with PAD do not have noticeable symptoms. When symptoms of PAD are present, they often include fatigue, heaviness, cramping or pain in the legs during activity, leg or foot pain, sores, wounds or ulcers on the toes, feet, or legs, which are slow to heal. Persons with PAD may become disabled and not be able to work, and can even lead to amputations. According to the SAGE Group, there are approximately 160,000 amputations due to PAD per year and, according to the National Limb Loss Information Center, an estimated 2.02 million Americans are amputees.
Risk factors for developing PAD include:

  • Age (over 50 years)

  • Race (African-American)

  • History of smoking

  • Diabetes

  • High blood pressure

  • High blood cholesterol

  • Personal history of vascular disease, heart attack, or stroke.
We believe medical personnel who care for those older than 50 years are the target market for FloChec™.®, along with those insurance plans that have a high number of Medicare Advantage patients. Based on U.S. Census data, we believe there are more than 80 million older Americans who could be evaluated for the presence of PAD.
According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, there are over 200,000 internists, family practitioners and gerontologists in the United States. In addition, based on American Heart Association data, there are over 20,000 cardiologists and 7,500 vascular and cardiovascular surgeons. Also, there are
43

millions of diabetic patients seen routinely by endocrinologists. Many podiatrists who see patients with these problems and orthopedic surgeons may see value in screening patients for circulation issues prior to leg procedures. Neurologists may need a tool to differentiate leg pain from vascular versus neurologic etiology. Nephrologists see patients with kidney disease, who have a higher frequency of PAD. Wound care centers need to know the adequacy of limb perfusion. We expect that each physician will have thousands ofmany patient visits annually from people older than 50 years. While, it is standard practice to ask about symptoms of PAD and to feel for diminished pulses on physical exam, we believe that it is often the case in busy practices, that the questions go unasked.
In addition, the physical exam of the extremities is generally cursory in the absence of a patient complaint. Given the ease of use and speed of FloChec®, we believe that many doctors will incorporate its use in their practice as a routine annual test to measure blood flow in an extremity. It is our intent that FloChec® be incorporated as a tool in the routine physical exam of adult patients by primary care providers in a similar fashion to the use of a thermometer or stethoscope. Providers do not request payment for using a stethoscope during the physical examination. Similarly, we do

not expect (or intend) for providers that use our FloChec® to seek such a reimbursement approval. FloChec® is not specifically approved under a third-party payor code and we do not track customer requests for reimbursements. Accordingly, our customers may or may not be successful in receiving reimbursement if sought.
Strategy
Our mission is to develop, manufacture and market patented products and solutions that identify the risk profile of medical patients to allowassist healthcare providers to capture full reimbursement potential for their services, while growing revenuesin monitoring patients and becoming and maintaining profitability.evaluating chronic diseases. We intend to do this by:

  • Capitalizing on opportunities provided by the Health Care Reform Law.capitated payment programs   Under the Health Care Reform Law, for.   For many capitated programs, payment is higher for sicker patients who have conditions that are codified. We believe a provider would prefer to have more remuneration for taking care of a patient. A provider expects to spend less time caring for a healthy patient than for a sicker patient. If payment per month was the same for both types of patients, there wouldcould be a perverse incentivedisincentive for the provider to only want to care for healthymore unhealthy persons. Accordingly, CMS anticipated this situation and pays more per month for “sicker” patients who have chronic conditions that are identified on the medical record through use of an established coding system. This creates a business opportunity in finding low-cost, effective means to identify the conditions, which have been established in coding systems for risk adjustment of payments (higher payments paid to providers and healthcare plans to compensate them for caring for sicker or more risky patients). The more common and more dangerous a condition is, the greater the opportunity for profit. The goal is to provide cost-effective wellness.

  • Targeting customers with patients at risk of developing PAD.PAD.   Healthcare providers use blood flow measurements as part of their assessment of a patient’s vascular condition. Our strategy is to keep marketing FloChec™FloChec® on a lease-based servicelicense-based model to insurance plans and medical personnel who care for those older than 50, including cardiologists, internists, nephrologists, endocrinologist, podiatrists, and family practitioners. Specifically, we believe there are more than 250,000 physicians and other potential customers in the United States alone, many of thewhom care for patients of whom will be more than 50 years old and at increased risk of developing PAD. Based on U.S. Census data, the evaluable patient population for FloChec™FloChec® is estimated to be more than 80 million patients in the United States annually.

  • Expanding the tools available to internists and non-peripheral vascular experts.experts.   Our intention is to provide a tool to internists and non-peripheral vascular experts, for whom it was previously impractical to conduct a blood flow measurement unless in a specialized vascular laboratory. For vascular specialist, FloChec™specialists, FloChec® does not require the use of blood pressure cuffs (which should not be used on some breast cancer patients), and measures without blood pressure in obese patients and patients with non-compressible, hard, calcified arteries. Currently, these patients often are unable to be measured satisfactorily with traditional analog ABI devices.
44


  • Developing additional productsproduct and service offerings that allow healthcare providers to capture the full reimbursement potentialdeliver cost-effective wellness and receive increased compensation for their services.services.   We are currently developingrecently received FDA 510(k) clearance of the next generation of our product, FloChec®, reflecting several new productsupdates and modifications to the original model that were developed in conjunction with our consultant engineering groups thatgroups. We are intendedalso exploring potential new product and service offerings. These product and service offerings are being designed to provide cost-effective wellness solutions for our growing, established customer base. The new products and service offerings under development or tothat may be developed may incorporate some of our current technology or new technology. The goal is to achieve a reputation for outstanding service and sell new cost effectivecost-effective wellness solutions to leverage our gains in the marketplace for such product offerings.
Sales and Marketing
We provide our FloChec® product and WellChec™ services to our customers through our salespersons and we also provide FloChec®through our co-exclusive distributor, Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc., or Bard, a large medical device company with a worldwide presence in both interventional cardiology and dialysis. We signedbegan a co-exclusive supply and distribution agreementarrangement with Bard in late 2012 in an effort to increase our sales and marketing reach, which agreementarrangement accounted for less than 20% of our revenues in each of 20122013 and 2013.2014. With certain

exceptions, we appointed Bard on a co-exclusive basis to leaselicense FloChec® to certain customers, and we retained the right to leaselicense directly to such customers as well. In addition to our co-exclusive distributor, we have direct sales and marketing representatives, who have experience in the fields of family practice and podiatry.selling products to our anticipated market.
We generally make available to our sales team (including our distributor) an inventory of FloChec®products consistent with their needs. Our product is then directly delivered to our customer by the salesperson at the time he/she conductsand in-service training to the customer.customer is provided either on-line or in person. Because FloChec® is relatively easy to use training can generally be accomplished in less than 15 minutes.one day.
Our customers generallyCustomers who have licensed our FloChec® product may pay by credit card or check on the 15th15th of each month as an advance for usage during the next 30 days. In some cases, customers prefer an annual license paid in advance. We provide technical support daily, coupled directly to the manufacturing operation so that replacement products, if needed, can be shipped overnight directly to the customer. The majority of the support is over the telephone and focuses on software and connectivity issues, rather than hardware. We plan to upgrade FloChec® operating systems as appropriate by direct shipments. In the future, we plan to ship directly to customers and handle the installation and training remotely if appropriate.
In addition to the license model, which we have done historically, we have recently begun exploring other options to generate revenue from our FloChec® product. We are currently pilot testing a fee-per-test model, in which we invoice on a per test basis for use of FloChec®. In March 2015 we also launched our multi-test platform, WellChec™, to perform risk assessments for our customers. In this service model, we work with our customer to determine the location, the risk assessment test to be performed, and the customer tells us who should be tested. We then set up at the location, schedule the patients for screening, and arrange for these tests to be performed and send the results. The testing is performed by us or our sub-contractors, and can include other non-proprietary tests alongside FloChec® testing, such as heart, lung, eye and/or neuropathy tests. We then invoice on a per test basis under the WellChec™ model.
Manufacturing
We manufacture our product, FloChec® through an independent contractor. We entered into our service and supply agreement with the contract manufacturer in April 2011 and pay our manufacturer for finished goods. The contract provides for subassemblies, product final assembly, test, serialization, finished goods, inventory and shipping operations. Our current contract will remain in force until terminated by us upon three months written notice, or until terminated by either party for cause. Although we believe we have a good working relationship with our current contract manufacturer, there are many such qualified contract manufacturers available around the country should we need to replace them or if they are not able to meet demand as we grow our business as anticipated. We believe FloChec® is relatively easy to manufacture. We employ a consultant vendor qualification expert to monitor and test the quality controls and quality assurance procedures of our contract manufacturer.
45

Competition
The principal competitor for FloChec® is the standard blood pressure cuff ankle-brachial index, or ABI, device. FloChec® does not include a blood pressure cuff. We are not aware of another product that performs digital ABIsuch testing without the use of a blood pressure cuff. There are several companies that manufacture the traditional ABI device, which range in price from $2,500 to $20,000. Some of these companies are much larger than us and have more financial resources and their own distributor network. The traditional ABI devices are differentiated by the degree of automation designed into each product. ABI devices that rely more heavily on operator assessment (i.e., listening to the return of pulse while decreasing cuff pressure), are thought to have less objectivity in their measurement. We know of no direct ‘digital ABI’‘non-pressure cuff ABI competitor to FloChec®. Because standard ABI devices require a better trained operator, the products are usually sold to specialized vascular labs that are supervised by a vascular surgeon, with the tests performed by a licensed vascular technician. It is not uncommon for such ABI devices to be marketed to the offices of internists, podiatrists, endocrinologists or most cardiologists.
Our intention is to provide a tool to internists and non-peripheral vascular experts, for whom it was previously impractical to conduct a blood flow measurement unless in a specialized vascular laboratory. For vascular specialists, FloChec® does not require the use of blood pressure cuffs (which should not be used on some breast cancer patients), and measures without blood pressure in obese patients and patients with non-compressible, hard, calcified arteries. Currently, these patients often are unable to be measured with traditional analog ABI devices.
We also expect to face competition for our recently launched WellChec™ platform from other risk assessment service providers. Other than the proprietary FloChec® test, the other components of the WellChec™ service are basic tests performed with commercially available equipment by medical personnel. Any physician, hospital or like medical services provider can perform these tests, if it were convenient for them to do so.
Research and Development Program
We have dedicated, engineering consultants that are well integrated into our overall business, ranging from customer requirements to technical support. The engineering group uses our in-house quality system as its framework for new product development and release. The majority of the engineering is circuit design and software development, as FloChec® is PC-based. We recently received 510(k) clearance of our next generation product and we are currently developing several new productsupdates and modifications. We also recently launched our WellChec™ multi-test platform. We intend to continue to develop updates and modifications to FloChec® in conjunction with our consultant engineering groups.groups, as well as exploring potential new product and service offerings. These new productsproduct and service offerings are being designed to provide

cost-effective wellness solutions for our growing, established customer base. The new products and service offerings under development or that may be developed may incorporate some of our current technology or new technology. We are also directing much of our activity to building our patent portfolio and protecting proprietary positions.
We have sponsored two recentthree studies of FloChec®. One of these studies, the results of which were compiled in 2012 and published in a peer reviewed journal in 2013, sought to determine the frequency of finding undiscovered vascular disease in primary care practices using FloChec®. In the study of 632 patients at 19 office practices, the frequency of flow obstruction was 12% and of these patients, 75% did not have classic symptoms of PAD. Among other limitations of the study, the publication mentions the study’s retrospective design, no direct comparison to other vascular tests, and passive data collection such that 8% of patients had one or more missing data fields.
The other recentAnother study we sponsored was designed to assess the side by side performance of FloChec®compared with traditional analog ABI with Doppler measurements in medical practices. In the study of 181 limbs from 121 patients at 5 medical practices during 2012 and 2013, three techniques were used on all limbs: FloChec®, traditional analog ABI with Doppler, and Duplex ultrasound imaging. Traditional analog ABI with Doppler was unable to perform a conclusive study in 8.7% of limbs. In the remaining limbs, the FloChec® measurement and the ABI with Doppler measurements were in agreement, or in other words concordant, in 78% of limbs. Among the discordant limbs, Duplex imaging judged that the true positive
46

rate of FloChec® was significantly higher than that of ABI with Doppler by a 2 to 1 margin. The results of the study have not been submitted for publication in a peer reviewed journal and are available as a white paper that may be shown to potential customers or other interested parties. Among other limitations of the study, the study had a small sample size, was conducted at specialty practices not primary care practices, had a retrospective design with incomplete collection of demographic information and clinical characteristics of the population, was not peer reviewed and was sponsored by us.
The third study also was designed to assess the side by side performance of FloChec® compared with traditional analog ABI with Doppler measurements in medical practices. In this prospective study at 5 medical practices during 2013, 215 limbs from 108 patients were examined with three techniques: FloChec®, traditional analog ABI with Doppler, and Duplex ultrasound imaging as a gold standard. Results demonstrated that FloChec® demonstrated greater sensitivity, similar accuracy and less specificity than ABI with Doppler measurements. The results of the study have been submitted for publication in a peer reviewed journal. Among limitations of the study are that it had a small sample size, was conducted at specialty practices not primary care practices, and was sponsored by us.
Patents and Licenses
We have been issued one patent for our apparatus,, U.S. Patent No. 7,628,760, which expires October 4, 2021.December 11, 2027. Three other U.S. patent applications are pending. Other patents are in process.
Governmental Regulation
FloChecWe initially received FDA 510(k) clearance in February 2010 of FloChec®as a Class II Medical Device. Advanced Vascular Technologies, an entity formerly affiliated with our founder and Chairman, Dr. Semler, applied for and obtained for thethat 510(k) clearance. However, any interests it may have had in such 510(k) clearance were subsequently assigned to us and it did not manufacture any products for our company. The Class II Medical Device designation means that FloChec® is a commercial device and is currently being sold in the United States. In March 2015, the FDA provided 510(k) clearance of the next generation version, reflecting several modifications and updates.
Class II devices are subject to the FDA’s general controls, and any other special controls as deemed necessary by the FDA to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device. Pre-market review and clearance by the FDA for Class II devices are generally accomplished through the 510(k) pre-market notification procedure. Pre-market notification submissions are subject to user fees, unless a specific exemption applies.
As our business is subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign regulations, we currently employ an established regulatory consultant specializing in medical devices to maintain our regulatory filings, monitor our on-going activities, and ensure compliance with all federal and state regulations.
Some of the pertinent laws have not been definitively interpreted by the regulatory authorities or the courts, and their provisions are open to a variety of subjective interpretations. In addition, these laws and their interpretations are subject to change. Both federal and state governmental agencies continue to subject the healthcare industry to intense regulatory scrutiny, including heightened civil and criminal enforcement efforts. We believe that we have structured our business operations and relationships with our customers to comply with all applicable legal requirements. However, it is possible that governmental entities or other third parties could interpret these laws differently and assert otherwise. We discuss below the statutes and regulations that are most relevant to our business.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration Regulation
FloChec® is a medical device subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and other federal, state, local and foreign regulatory bodies. FDA regulations govern, among other things, the following activities that we or our partners perform and will continue to perform:

  • product design and development;

product testing;
47


  • product testing;
  • product manufacturing;

  • product safety;

  • post-market adverse event reporting;

  • post-market surveillance;

  • product labeling;

  • product storage;





FDA’s Pre-market Clearance and Approval Requirements
To commercially distribute in the United States, FloChec® or any future medical device we develop requires or will require either prior 510(k) clearance or prior approval of a premarket approval, or PMA, application from the FDA. The FDA classifies medical devices into one of three classes. Devices deemed to pose lower risk are placed in either class I or II, which requires the manufacturer to submit to the FDA a pre-market notification requesting permission for commercial distribution. This process is known as 510(k) clearance. Some low risk devices are exempt from this requirement. Devices deemed by the FDA to pose the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or implantable devices, or devices deemed not substantially equivalent to a previously cleared 510(k) device are placed in class III, requiring approval of a PMA application. Both pre-market clearance and PMA applications are subject to the payment of user fees, paid at the time of submission for FDA review. The FDA can also impose restrictions on the sale, distribution or use of devices at the time of their clearance or approval, or subsequent to marketing.
510(k) Clearance Pathway
To obtain 510(k) clearance, a medical device manufacturer must submit a pre-market notification demonstrating that the proposed device is substantially equivalent to a previously cleared 510(k) device or a device that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 for which the FDA has not yet called for the submission of PMA applications. The FDA’s 510(k) clearance pathway usually takes from three to 12 months from the date the application is completed, but it can take significantly longer and clearance is never assured. Although many 510(k) pre-market notifications are cleared without clinical data, in some cases, the FDA requires significant clinical data to support substantial equivalence. In reviewing a pre-market notification, the FDA may request additional information, including clinical data, which may significantly prolong the review process. After a device receives 510(k) clearance, any modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change in its intended use, will require a new 510(k) clearance or could require a PMA application. The FDA requires each manufacturer to make this determination initially, but the FDA can review any such decision and can disagree with a manufacturer’s determination. If the FDA disagrees with a manufacturer’s determination regarding whether a new pre-market submission is required for the modification of an existing device, the FDA can require the manufacturer to cease marketing and/or recall the modified device until 510(k)

clearance or approval of a PMA application is obtained. If the FDA requires us to seek 510(k) clearance or approval of a PMA application for any modifications to FloChec® we may be required to cease marketing or recall the modified device until we obtain this clearance or approval. Also, in these circumstances, we may be subject to significant regulatory fines or penalties for failure to submit the requisite PMA application(s). We have made and plan to continue to make minor additional product enhancements that we believe do not require new 510(k) clearances. In addition, the FDA is currently evaluating the 510(k)
48

clearance process and may make substantial changes to industry requirements, including which devices are eligible for 510(k) clearance, the ability to rescind previously granted 510(k) clearance and additional requirements that may significantly impact the process.
Pre-market Approval Pathway
A PMA application must be submitted if the device cannot be cleared through the 510(k) clearance process and requires proof of the safety and effectiveness of the device to the FDA’s satisfaction. Accordingly, a PMA application must be supported by extensive data including, but not limited to, technical information regarding device design and development, preclinical and clinical trials, data and manufacturing and labeling to support the FDA’s determination that the device is safe and effective for its intended use. After a PMA application is complete, the FDA begins an in-depth review of the submitted information, which generally takes between one and three years, but may take significantly longer. During this review period, the FDA may request additional information or clarification of information already provided. Also during the review period, an advisory panel of experts from outside the FDA may be convened to review and evaluate the application and provide recommendations to the FDA as to the approvability of the device. In addition, the FDA will conduct a preapproval inspection of the manufacturing facility to ensure compliance with Quality System Regulations, or QSRs, which impose elaborate design development, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures in the design and manufacturing process. The FDA may approve a PMA application with post-approval conditions intended to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device including, among other things, restrictions on labeling, promotion, sale and distribution and collection of long-term follow-up data from patients in the clinical study that supported approval. Failure to comply with the conditions of approval can result in materially adverse enforcement action, including the loss or withdrawal of the approval. New PMA applications or PMA application supplements are required for significant modifications to the manufacturing process, labeling and design of a device that is approved through the PMA process. PMA supplements often require submission of the same type of information as a PMA application, except that the supplement is limited to information needed to support any changes from the device covered by the original PMA application, and may not require as extensive clinical data or the convening of an advisory panel.
Pervasive and Continuing FDA Regulation
After a device is placed on the market, regardless of its classification or pre-market pathway, numerous regulatory requirements apply. These include, but are not limited to:

  • establishing registration and device listings with the FDA;

  • quality system regulation, which requires manufacturers to follow stringent design, testing, process control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures;

  • labeling regulations, which prohibit the promotion of products for uncleared or unapproved, i.e., “off-label,” uses and impose other restrictions on labeling;

  • medical device reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers report to the FDA if their device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to recur;

  • corrections and removal reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers report to the FDA field corrections and product recalls or removals if undertaken to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, that may present a risk to health; and

  • requirements to conduct post-market surveillance studies to establish continued safety data.

The FDA enforces these requirements by inspection and market surveillance. Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in enforcement action by the FDA, which may include any of the following sanctions:

  • untitled letters or warning letters;
49


  • fines, injunctions and civil penalties;

  • recall or seizure of our products;

  • operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of production;

  • refusing our request for 510(k) clearance or pre-market approval of new products;

  • withdrawing 510(k) clearance or pre-market approvals that are already granted; and

  • criminal prosecution.
We are subject to unannounced device inspections by the FDA and the California Food and Drug Branch. These inspections may include our suppliers’ facilities.
Sales and Marketing Commercial Compliance
Federal anti-kickback laws and regulations prohibit, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly, in exchange for, or to induce either the referral of an individual, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service paid for under federal healthcare programs such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Possible sanctions for violation of these anti-kickback laws include monetary fines, civil and criminal penalties, exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid programs and forfeiture of amounts collected in violation of such prohibitions.
In addition, federal false claims laws prohibit any person from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false claim for payment to the federal government, or knowingly making, or causing to be made, a false statement to get a false claim paid. Off-label promotion has been pursued as a violation of the federal false claims laws. Pursuant to FDA regulations, we can only market our products for cleared or approved uses. Although surgeons are permitted to use medical devices for indications other than those cleared or approved by the FDA based on their medical judgment, we are prohibited from promoting products for such off-label uses. Additionally, the majority of states in which we market our products have similar anti-kickback, false claims, anti-fee splitting and self-referral laws, which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers, and violations may result in substantial civil and criminal penalties.
To enforce compliance with the federal laws, the U.S. Department of Justice, or DOJ, has increased its scrutiny of interactions between healthcare companies and healthcare providers, which has led to an unprecedented level of investigations, prosecutions, convictions and settlements in the healthcare industry. Dealing with investigations can be time- andtime-and resource-consuming. Additionally, if a healthcare company settles an investigation with the DOJ or other law enforcement agencies, thesuch company may be required to agree to additional compliance and reporting requirements as part of a consent decree or corporate integrity agreement.
The U.S. and foreign government regulators have increased regulation, enforcement, inspections and governmental investigations of the medical device industry, including increased U.S. government oversight and enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Whenever a governmental authority concludes that we are not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, that authority can impose fines, delay or suspend regulatory clearances, institute proceedings to detain or seize our products, issue a recall, impose operating restrictions, enjoin future violations and assess civil penalties against us or our officers or employees and can recommend criminal prosecution. Moreover, governmental authorities can ban or request the recall, repair, replacement or refund of the cost of devices we distribute.
Additionally, the commercial compliance environment is continually evolving in the healthcare industry as some states, including California, Massachusetts and Vermont, mandate implementation of corporate compliance programs, along with the tracking and reporting of gifts, compensation and other remuneration

to physicians. The Health Care Reform Law also imposesimposed new reporting and disclosure requirements on device manufacturers for any “transfer of value” made or distributed to prescribers and other healthcare providers, effective March 30, 2013. Such information will beis now made publicly available in a searchable format beginning September 30, 2013. Deviceand device manufacturers will also beare now required to report and disclose any investment interests held by physicians and their family members during the preceding calendar year. Failure to submit required
50

information may result in civil monetary penalties of up to an aggregate of  $150,000 per year (and up to an aggregate of  $1 million per year for “knowing failures”), for all payments, transfers of value or ownership or investment interests not reported in an annual submission. The shifting compliance environment and the need to build and maintain robust and expandable systems to comply in multiple jurisdictions with different compliance and/or reporting requirements increases the possibility that a healthcare company may run afoul of one or more of the requirements.
Third-Party Coverage and Reimbursement
Although it is our intent that FloChec® be incorporated as a tool in the routine physical exam of adult patients by primary care providers in a similar fashion to the use of a thermometer or stethoscope (such that reimbursement is not sought), we cannot control whether or not providers who use FloChec®will seek third-party coverage for such procedures or reimbursement. If providers intend to seek third-party coverage or reimbursement for use of FloChec®, the success of our product could become dependent on the availability of coverage and reimbursement from third-party payors, such as governmental programs including Medicare and Medicaid, private insurance plans and managed care programs. Reimbursement is contingent on established coding for a given procedure, coverage of the codes by the third-party payors and adequate payment for the resources used.
Physician coding for procedures is established by the American Medical Association. CMS, the agency responsible for administering Medicare, and the National Center for Health Statistics, are jointly responsible for overseeing changes and modifications to billing codes used by hospitals for reporting inpatient procedures, and many private payors use coverage decisions and payment amounts determined by CMS for Medicare as guidelines in setting their coverage and reimbursement policies. All physician and hospital coding is subject to change, which could impact coverage and reimbursement and physician practice behavior. We do not track denial of requests for reimbursement made by the users of FloChec®. It is our belief that such denials have occurred and might occur in the future with more or less frequency. We are not in the business of performing FloChec® measurements or seeking reimbursement from third-party payerspayors as our customers, should they choose to do so, are responsible for performing tests and seeking reimbursements.
Independent of the coding status, third-party payors may deny coverage based on their own criteria, such as if they believe that the clinical efficacy of a device or procedure is not well established and is deemed experimental or investigational, is not the most cost-effective treatment available, or is used for an unapproved indication. We will continue to provide the appropriate resources to patients, physicians, hospitals and insurers in order to promote the best in patient care and clarity regarding reimbursement and work to reverse any non-coverage policies. For some governmental programs, such as Medicaid, coverage and reimbursement differ from state to state, and some state Medicaid programs may not pay an adequate amount for the procedures performed with our products, if any payment is made at all. As the portion of the U.S. population over the age of 65 and eligible for Medicaid continues to grow, we may be more vulnerable to coverage and reimbursement limitations imposed by CMS. National and regional coverage policy decisions are subject to unforeseeable change and have the potential to impact physician behavior. For example, if CMS decreases the monthly payment for a 65 year old patient, then the provider will have to decide which steps to eliminate from his or her routine office visits in order to maintain a profitable business model. If the time of an office visit will need to be reduced to maintain a profitable business, a provider may decide to eliminate certain services or conducting certain procedures, such as deciding not to use a thermometer, take someone’s blood pressure or use a FloChec® to run an ABI test. Thus, reimbursement limitations imposed by CMS on providers may affect their decision making about which services to provide during an office visit, which could affect our company.
Particularly in the United States, third-party payors carefully review, have undertaken cost-containment initiatives, and increasingly challenge, the prices charged for procedures and medical products as well as any technology that they, in their own judgment, consider experimental or

investigational. In addition, an increasing percentage of insured individuals are receiving their medical care through managed care programs, which monitor and often require pre-approval or pre-authorization of the services that a member will receive. Many managed care programs are paying their providers on a capitated basis, which puts the providers at financial risk for the services provided to their patients by paying them a predetermined amount per member per month. The percentage of individuals covered by managed care programs is expected to grow in the United States over the next decade.
51

There can be no assurance that third-party coverage and reimbursement will be available or adequate, or that future legislation, regulation, or coverage and reimbursement policies of third-party payors will not adversely affect the demand for our products or our ability to sell these products on a profitable basis. The unavailability or inadequacy of third-party payor coverage or reimbursement could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Healthcare Fraud and Abuse
Healthcare fraud and abuse laws apply to our business when a customer submits a claim for an item or service that is reimbursed under Medicare, Medicaid or most other federally-funded healthcare programs. The federal Anti-Kickback Law prohibits unlawful inducements for the referral of business reimbursable under federally-funded healthcare programs, such as remuneration provided to physicians to induce them to use certain tissue products or medical devices reimbursable by Medicare or Medicaid. The Anti-Kickback Law is subject to evolving interpretations. For example, the government has enforced the Anti-Kickback Law to reach large settlements with healthcare companies based on sham consultant arrangements with physicians or questionable joint venture arrangements. The majority of states also have anti-kickback laws, which establish similar prohibitions that may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial insurers. Further, the recently enacted Health Care Reform Law, among other things, amends the intent requirement of the federal anti-kickback and criminal healthcare fraud statutes. A person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it. In addition, the Health Care Reform Law provides that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal anti-kickback statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the false claims statutes.
If a governmental authority were to conclude that we are not in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, we and our officers and employees could be subject to severe criminal and civil penalties including, for example, exclusion from participation as a supplier of product to beneficiaries covered by Medicare or Medicaid.
Additionally, the civil False Claims Act prohibits knowingly presenting or causing the presentation of a false, fictitious or fraudulent claim for payment to the U.S. government. Actions under the False Claims Act may be brought by the Attorney General or as a qui tam action by a private individual in the name of the government. Violations of the False Claims Act can result in very significant monetary penalties and treble damages. The federal government is using the False Claims Act, and the accompanying threat of significant liability, in its investigations of healthcare providers and suppliers throughout the country for a wide variety of Medicare billing practices, and has obtained multi-million and multi-billion dollar settlements in addition to individual criminal convictions. Given the significant size of actual and potential settlements, it is expected that the government will continue to devote substantial resources to investigating healthcare providers’ and suppliers’ compliance with the healthcare reimbursement rules and fraud and abuse laws.
Employees
As of JanuaryMarch 31, 2014,2015, we had 1224 employees, all of whom were full time employees. None of our employees is represented by a labor union, and we consider our relationship with our employees to be good. These employees include 3three executive officers and 4 direct16 employees dedicated to sales professionals.and marketing of our product. We also had 12 active consultants.
regularly engage consultants and subcontractors on an as-needed basis.

Description of PropertyProperties
Because we outsource our manufacturing to a “turn-key” manufacturer and have a geographically dispersed sales force and distributor arrangement, we have minimal needs for office space to conduct our day-to-day business operations. We currently use space for our corporate headquarters on a rent-free basis in a building located at 2330 NW Everett St., Portland, OR, that is owned by our Chairman and co-founder, Dr. Herbert Semler. We have also leased other facilities on an as-needed basis for our sales and marketing operations. For example, we lease a sales office in Menlo Park, CA as well as other smaller facilities in the Bay Area. See Note 7 to our audited financial statements, appearing elsewhere in this prospectus for a description of our Menlo Park, CA lease.
52

Legal Proceedings
We areFrom time to time, we may be subject to claimslegal proceedings and legal actions that ariseclaims in the ordinary course of business from time to time. However, webusiness. We are not currently subjecta party to any claimslitigation the outcome of which, if determined adversely to us, would individually or actions that we believe wouldin the aggregate be reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows or financial position or results of operations.
condition.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ManagementMANAGEMENT
Board of Directors and Executive Officers
The following are our Directorsdirectors and executive officers and their respective ages and positions as of January 31, 2014:April 30, 2015:
NameAgePosition
Herbert J. Semler, M.D.85Chairman of the Board
Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, M.D.59Chief Executive Officer and Director
Robert G. McRae45Chief Operating Officer
Daniel E. Conger37Vice President of Finance (principal financial and accounting officer)
William H.C. Chang57Director
Greg S. Garfield50Director
Dinesh Gupta63Director
Elliot A. Sainer67Director
Shirley Semler78Director
NameAgePositionDirector SinceTerm Expires
Herbert J. Semler, M.D.86Chairman of the BoardNovember 20072015
Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, M.D.60Chief Executive Officer and DirectorSeptember 20122015
Robert G. McRae46Chief Operating OfficerN/AN/A
James M. Walker66Chief Financial OfficerN/AN/A
Bruce J Barclay58DirectorMay 20142015
Aidan M. Collins52DirectorJuly 20142015
Greg S. Garfield52DirectorNovember 20132015
Arthur “Abbie” Leibowitz, M.D., F.A.A.P.68DirectorJune 20142015
Wayne T. Pan, M.D., Ph.D.51DirectorMay 20142015
Shirley L. Semler79DirectorNovember 20072015
Directors and Executive Officers
Herbert J. Semler, M.D. — Dr. Herbert J. Semler co-founded Semler Scientific, Inc. in 2007 and has served as Chairmanchairman of the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors since that time. Dr. Semler also served as our Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer until October 31, 2012. Over his 45 years of medical practice, Dr. Semler has developed, manufactured, and marketed products for three cardiovascular companies. As a board certified cardiologist, Dr. Semler holds multiple patents and patent applications for cardiovascular products. He has experience with Holter monitoring, telemedicine, cardiac telemetry, pace makerpacemaker surveillance, cardiac event monitoring, including development of the “King of Hearts” device. Dr. Semler also invented a femoral vascular hemostatic device, which has been used on over fifteen million patients. Dr. Semler has had a distinguished career in medicine including the following accomplishments. Heaccomplishments: he has served as Professor of Cardiology at Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU) where he founded and funded The Dr. Herbert and Shirley Semler Cardiovascular Institute. HeInstitute; he is a Fellow of the American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, Society of Cardiac Interventions and Angiography, and the American Heart Association. HeAssociation; and he has published over 90 articles in the field of cardiovascular medicine. Dr. Semler is also the chairman of the Shirley & Herbert Semler Foundation and until March 2008 was the chairman of Advanced Vascular Dynamics. Dr. Semler is currently the Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer of Semler Health Perks, Inc., a private medical consumer software applications company founded by Dr. Semler in October 2012. Dr. Semler is the husband of our Directordirector and co-founder, Shirley L. Semler. Dr. Semler’s extensive experience in the fields of cardiology and medical device companies, and his experience and knowledge as a founder and executive of our company qualify him to be a director of our Chairman of the Board and Director.company.
Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, M.D. — Dr. Douglas Murphy-Chutorian has served as a member of our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors since September 2012 and as our Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer since October 31, 2012. Dr. Murphy-Chutorian has had broad, diverse career experience in healthcare over the past 30 years, stretching from clinician, academician, inventor, entrepreneur, Chief Executive Officer, Chairmanchief executive officer, chairman of the Board,board, and consultant to financial firms. Since April 15, 2005, he has been Managing Directormanaging director of Select Healthcare Capital, LLC. Dr. Murphy-Chutorian is a named inventor on more than 30 patents, and has guided more than 50 products through various regulatory approval processes. His business career has included extensive involvement in all facets of the medical industry from financial, research and development, manufacturing, marketing and sales, regulatory, reimbursement, and clinical trials. His breadth of healthcare experience includes all major sectors of the industry: medical devices, health services, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and managed care. He received his B.A. and M.D. from Columbia University. He completed his Internal Medicineinternal medicine residency at New York University/Bellevue Medical Center
54

and his fellowship in Cardiologycardiology at Stanford University Medical Center. He has served as a faculty member in interventional cardiology at both Stanford and Montefiore Medical Center. Dr. Murphy-Chutorian’s experience as a cardiologist, inventor and executive qualify him to be a director of our Director and Chief Executive Officer.
company.

Robert G. McRae — Mr. Robert G. McRae has served as our Chief Operating Officerchief operating officer since November 2010. Mr. McRae is a seasoned executive experienced in the medical device industry, specifically in growing early stage companies. As Chief Operating Officer,chief operating officer, he has been responsible for all operational aspects of theour company. From April 2010 until joining our company, Mr. McRae was the principal consultant of McRae Consulting. From March 2008 to April 2010, Mr. McRae was VP, Researchvice president, research and Business Developmentbusiness development for Bacchus Vascular, Inc. He was part of the diligence, eventual acquisition, and subsequent integration of Bacchus Vascular into Covidien, Inc. From 2002 to 2007, Mr. McRae held several different positions with VNUS Medical, including heading Manufacturing, Researchmanufacturing, research and Development,development, and Business Development.business development. Mr. McRae built the infrastructures and teams that supported VNUS’ growth from a start-up, through a successful IPO.initial public offering. Prior to VNUS, Mr. McRae worked at Stryker Endoscopy. Prior to his medical device experience, Mr. McRae held various positions in the U.S. Navy for a period of six years. Mr. McRae earned an MBAM.B.A. from Santa Clara University and a BSMEB.S.M.E. from San Jose State University.
Daniel E. CongerJames M. Walker — Mr. Daniel E. CongerJames M. Walker has served as our Vice Presidentchief financial officer and principal accounting officer since June 18, 2014 pursuant to a consulting agreement with The Brenner Group. Mr. Walker is a seasoned Silicon Valley executive with over 25 years of Finance since October 2010.executive management experience in various technology fields as chief financial officer, chief operating officer and chief executive officer, including as chief financial officer for three public companies. Mr. Walker is currently employed by The Brenner Group, Inc., a management services firm. Mr. Walker previously served as chief financial officer for Spigit, Inc., a social media software company from August 2012 to February 2014. From September 2008 until joining our company,January 2012 and August 2012 Mr. Conger worked at Bacchus VascularWalker was employed by The Brenner Group. During his earlier association with The Brenner Group, Mr. Walker served as chief financial officer of Sierra Photonics, Inc. and its acquirer Covidien,Wikipad Inc. From December 2004 to December 2010, Mr. Walker also served as president and chief executive officer of Alara, Inc., a medical device suppliescompany, and pharmaceuticals company, whereprior to that he was the Plant Controllerheld chief financial officer positions with AlphaSmart, Inc., provider of technology solutions for the education market; Rivio, Inc., a provider of web-based services to small businesses; and Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc., a supplier of multimedia subsystems to the personal computer industry. Mr. Walker holds an M.B.A. from Santa Clara University and a B.S. in mathematics from San Jose plant. At Covidien, Mr. Conger was responsible for creation of a $130 million annual budget, leading a team of six people. He had sole responsibility for preparation of monthly and quarterly financial statements, and presented quarterly results to executive management of the global business unit. Mr. Conger has been working in the medical device, start-up and biotechnology industries since 2006, and has experience designing internal control systems, implementing such systems, and running finance in a business centered manner. He received his B.S. in Business Administration from Humboldt State University in May 2001 and an MBA — Accounting Option from California State University East Bay in June 2010.University.
William H.C. ChangBruce J Barclay — Mr. William H.C. ChangBruce J Barclay has served as a member of our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors since September 2012. SinceMay 2014. Mr. Barclay has over 35 years of experience in the healthcare industry, with nearly 15 years of that leading medical device companies. From 2010 to 2014 Mr. Barclay was president and chief executive officer, and a member of the board of directors, of Hansen Medical (NASDAQ: HNSN), a developer, manufacturer and global seller of intravascular robotics. From 2005 to 2010 he was president and chief executive officer, and a member of the board of directors, of SurModics (NASDAQ: SRDX), a provider of drug delivery and surface modifications technologies to the healthcare industry, having previously served as its president and chief operating officer from 2003 to 2005. Prior to joining SurModics, from 2000 to 2003, Mr. Barclay served as president and chief executive officer and a member of the board of directors of Vascular Architects, a medical device company that developed, manufactured and sold products to treat peripheral vascular disease. Prior to Vascular Architects, he was an officer and senior vice president of Guidant Corporation from 1994 to 2000. Before Guidant he held several positions of increasing responsibility at Eli Lilly and Company from 1978 to 1994. Mr. ChangBarclay received a J.D. from Indiana University School of Law, and a B.S. in Chemistry and a B.A. in Biology, both from Purdue University. He is also a registered patent attorney. Mr. Barclay’s extensive record of high achievement in managing research, product development, operations, as well as domestic and international commercial teams in multiple markets and his deep knowledge of the medical device industry qualify him to be a director of our company.
Aidan M. Collins — Mr. Aidan M. Collins has served as Chief Executive Officera member of Westlake Developmentour board of directors since July 2014. Mr. Collins currently serves as the chief executive officer and founder of ControlMetric, Inc., a consulting and software company focused on bringing data-driven, fact-based approaches to operational risk management. Mr. Collins is responsible for all aspects of company operations, including business
55

development, marketing and external relations. Prior to ControlMetric, Mr. Collins served as a partner at Bain & Company, from 2007 to 2010, where he led client relationships and consulting projects covering a real estaterange of strategic and operations issues, including IT strategy, cost reduction, post-merger integration and operations improvement. From 2004 to 2007, Mr. Collins was a partner in the advisory services practice at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, where he was a leader in the information technology effectiveness and healthcare payer practices in Northern California. Prior to that, Mr. Collins served as the senior vice president, sales and marketing in the healthcare group at Perot Systems, from 2002 to 2004, where he was responsible for leading sales and business development company, and is also Chairman of Westlake International Group, a privately held diversified investment company whose investments span private and public equities, including venture capital, professional sports, media and entertainment, emerging technologies, life sciences, and real estate. Mr. Chang’s associations and affiliations include: the Asian Business League (Founding Chairman); California International Relations Foundation (Director); Chinese American Association of Commerce (Founder); City Club of San Francisco (Founding Governor); Harvard University (Asia Center and Committeeefforts for large healthcare organizations nationwide, focused on University Resources); and World President’s Organization. Mr. Chang is the Co-Owner and General Partner of D. C. United. He is also on the Executive Committee of the San Francisco Giants Baseball Club, and on the Board of Directors of U.S.A. Rugby. Chang has a bachelor’s degree in Economics from Harvard College, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Mr. Chang’s involvement in numerous early stage medicalselling business process and technology companies,outsourcing services to large healthcare payers. From 1992 to 2002, Mr. Collins served as partner with the enterprise risk services group at Deloitte & Touche LLP, where his responsibilities included leading the firm’s national practice related to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, and the information security services practice in Northern California and Hawaii. Mr. Collins holds an M.B.A. from The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, an M.H.A. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a particular focus on clean/green, M2M, mobile,B.E. from University of Limerick in Ireland. We believe Mr. Collins’ extensive leadership and cloud based applications, both as an investor and directorbusiness experience qualify him to serve asbe a director of our Director.company.
Greg S. Garfield — Mr. Greg S. Garfield has served as a member of our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors since November 2013. Mr. Garfield serves as a director on the boards of sevena number of private companies in the healthcare industry. From 2006 to 2011, he had various roles at Acclarent, Inc., a medical technology company, including Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel.chief operating officer. Acclarent, Inc. was acquired by Johnson and Johnson at a valuation of approximately $800 million cash in January 2010. From 1995 to 2006, Mr. Garfield had various roles at Guidant Corporation, a medical technology company, including Vice President of Business Development and General Counsel.company. Guidant was acquired by Boston Scientific Corporation in 2006 at a valuation of approximately $27 billion in cash and stock. Mr. Garfield has a Bachelor of Science degree from California Polytechnic State University and a Juris DoctorateJ.D. from McGeorge School of Law, University of the Pacific.Pacific and a B.S. from California Polytechnic State University. We believe Mr. Garfield’s significant business experience at other medical technology companies qualifyqualifies him to be a director of our Director.company.
Dinesh GuptaArthur “Abbie” Leibowitz, M.D., F.A.A.P. — Mr. Dinesh GuptaDr. Arthur “Abbie” Leibowitz has served as a member of our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors since October 2013. Mr. Gupta isJune 2014. Dr. Leibowitz has over 40 years of experience in healthcare, with more than 25 years in leading positions with several healthcare companies. Since 2001, Dr. Leibowitz has been co-founder, chief medical officer and Managing Memberexecutive vice president at Health Advocate, Inc., a health advocacy and assistance company that provides support and helps consumers navigate the healthcare system. In June 2014, Health Advocate became a wholly owned subsidiary of the West Corporation, a publicly traded telecommunications and health services company. Health Advocate’s clients include more than 10,000 small, medium, and large sized companies, not-for-profit organizations and associations, schools, colleges and universities, unions, health plans, and third party administrators across the United States. Prior to his role at Health Advocate, Dr. Leibowitz served as executive vice president of digital health strategies and a member of the board of directors at Medicologic, Inc., where he was responsible for developing healthcare data, information services and strategies targeted at users of such company’s electronic medical record system, as well as data customers including payors, pharmaceutical companies, employers, regulatory and government agencies. Dr. Leibowitz served as vice president, medical delivery systems and chief medical officer at Aetna U.S. Healthcare, from 1996 to 2000, where he directed medical affairs and policies for one of the largest health benefits companies in the nation. In this role he was responsible for clinical policy development, technology assessment, patient management activities, and quality improvement programs. From 1993 to 1996, Dr. Leibowitz was the vice president, health delivery, corporate medical director at U.S. Healthcare, where he coordinated the expansion of medical programs regionally into eight new markets. Dr. Leibowitz had also served as vice president, health delivery, and a network medical director at U.S. Healthcare, from 1987 to 1993. From 1975 to 1987, Dr. Leibowitz was the senior physician at Drexel Hill Pediatric Associates, where he established seven physician pediatric group practice serving a large and diverse urban/suburban patient population. Dr. Leibowitz has authored many articles in medical literature, including revising his chapter on Health System Navigation in the recently published Second Edition of Population Health, Creating a Culture of Wellness, edited by David Nash and others. Dr. Leibowitz received both Satwik Ventures,his B.A. and M.D. degrees from Temple University. We believe Dr. Leibowitz’s extensive background, experience and knowledge of the healthcare industry qualify him to be a technology venture fund founded in 2000, and First Guardian Group, a real estate firm managing commercial
director of our company.

properties and syndicating private equity for providing equity for development projects and acquiring income properties throughout the United States that was founded in 2003. Mr. Gupta has led companies in all critical activities of business, including strategic planning, obtaining financing, and accounting. As the Managing Member of Satwik Ventures, Mr. Gupta has significant experience investing in early stage technology companies, guiding them in advisory roles and as a board member. As Managing Member of First Guardian Group, Mr. Gupta has led in the acquisition, development, and management of over 40 properties valued in excess of $500 million. Mr. Gupta’s experience managing business and advising early stage technology companies qualifies him to be our Director.
Elliot A. SainerWayne T. Pan, M.D., Ph.D. — Mr. Elliot A. SainerDr. Wayne T. Pan has served as a member of our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors since November 2013. Mr. Sainer servesMay 2014. Dr. Pan has over 20 years of broad healthcare industry experience from clinical medicine, to managed care, and health information technology. Dr. Pan is currently the chief medical officer at Applied Research Works, a healthcare software technology company based in Palo Alto, offering health plans and integrated delivery systems, a cloud-based platform providing timely, actionable clinical data to providers at the point of care. From August 2012 to May 2014 Dr. Pan served as chief medical officer at Thrasys, Inc., a directorglobal healthcare technology company that provides a cloud-based platform upon which healthcare delivery systems and provider organizations can build high quality, person-centered accountable care communities. Between October 2010 and July 2012, Dr. Pan was concurrently the chief medical informatics officer for Health Access Solutions, a health care software development company and chief medical officer of Pacific Partners Management Services, Inc., a medical management services company serving medical groups in northern California with over 50,000 covered lives. Prior to that, between September 2009 and February 2010, he served as chief medical officer for Affinity Medical Solutions, LLC, a medical management services organization serving independent physicians association clients and managing commercial and Medicare Advantage members. Dr. Pan has also served as chief medical officer between June 2008 and August 2009 for Alameda Alliance for Health, a local initiative health plan with Medicaid, Medicare Advantage Dual Eligible SNP and IHSS plans, and as an advisory chief medical officer at a data analytics start-up focused on the boardsbig data issues in healthcare in 2007-2008. Dr. Pan holds an M.B.A. from The Wharton School, University of five private companies in either the education or healthcare field,Pennsylvania, and from 2006 to 2011 was Vice Chairman of the Board of CRC Health Corporation. From 1998 to 2006, he was founderan M.D. and CEO of Aspen Education Group, the nation’s largest therapeutic education company. Aspen was acquired by CRC Health Corporation in 2006. Mr. Sainer is the immediate past Chairman of the Board of the Alzheimer’s Association of Greater Los Angeles, is a founding Board member of Emagine, a new charter high school (USC Hybrid High) developed in conjunction with USC, and is an active Board member of the Union Station Homeless Services in Pasadena. Mr. Sainer received his MBA from George Washington University and his BAPh.D. from the UniversityMt. Sinai School of Pittsburgh.Medicine, and a B.S. in Biology from Johns Hopkins University. We believe Mr. Sainer’s significantDr. Pan’s extensive healthcare-related business experience in the healthcare field, as well as his prior experience on the Board of a U.S. public company qualifyqualifies him to be a director of our Director.company.
Shirley L. Semler — Mrs. Shirley L. Semler is our co-founder and has served as a member of our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors since our formation in 2007. Mrs. Semler also served as an Executive Vice Presidentexecutive vice president until December 2009. Mrs. Semler is the holder of the patent on the Compressar hemostatic product that has been used on over 15 million patients. She was the co-founder and Presidentpresident of Instromedix, Inc., a medical product company that was acquired by Alares, Inc. She was also co-founder and Presidentpresident of Advanced Vascular Dynamics before it was sold. She attended Stephens College in Columbus, Missouri and the University of Colorado. Mrs. Semler is the wife of our Chairmanchairman of the Boardboard and co-founder, Dr. Herbert J. Semler. Mrs. Semler’s experience in the medical device business, and her experience and knowledge as a founder and executive of our company qualify her to be a director of our Director.company.
Corporate Governance
Director Independence
Applicable NASDAQ rules require a majority of a listed company’s board of directors to be comprised of independent directors within one year of listing. In addition, the NASDAQ rules require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees be independent and that audit committee members also satisfy independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Under applicable NASDAQ rules, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of the listed company’s board of directors, that person does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. In order to be considered independent for purposes of Rule 10A-3, a member of an audit committee of a listed company may not, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the audit committee, the board of directors, or any other board committee, accept, directly or indirectly, any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the listed company or any of its subsidiaries or otherwise be an affiliated person of the listed company or any of its subsidiaries.
In 2013,During 2014, our Boardboard of Directors undertook a reviewdirectors reviewed its composition and that of the composition of our Board of Directors and its committees and the independence of each director. Based upon information requested from and provided by each Directordirector concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors has determined that each of Messrs. Chang,Barclay, Collins and Garfield Gupta and SainerDrs. Leibowitz and Pan are “independent directors” as defined under applicable NASDAQ rules.rules, including the heightened independence standards applicable to audit committee and compensation committee members, as applicable. Our board of directors also determined that our former directors, Messrs. Chang, Gupta and
57

Sainer, each of whom resigned in 2014, were also “independent directors” as defined under applicable NASDAQ rules, including the heightened independence standards applicable to audit committee and compensation committee members. In making such determination,determinations, our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors considered the relationships that each such non-employee Directordirector has with our company and all other facts and circumstances that our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors deemed relevant in determining his or her independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee Director.
director.

Other than as described above inCommittees of the biographies under “— Board of Directors” there are no family relationships among any
Audit Committee.   Our audit committee is currently comprised of our Directors or executive officers.
Board Committees
Our Board of Directors has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation CommitteeMessrs. Barclay and a Nominating Committee effective uponCollins and Dr. Pan. Mr. Collins serves as the closing of this offering. The composition of each committee will be effective upon the closing of this offering.
Audit Committee
The members of our Audit Committee will be Messrs. Garfield, Gupta and Sainer. Mr. Gupta will be Chairmanchairman of the Audit Committee. Upon the closingaudit committee and our board of this offering, ourdirectors has also determined that Mr. Collins is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in applicable SEC rules. Our Audit Committee’s responsibilities will include:

  • appointing, approving the compensation of, and assessing the independence of our registered public accounting firm;

  • overseeing the work of our independent registered public accounting firm, including through the receipt and consideration of reports from that firm;

  • reviewing and discussing with management and our independent registered public accounting firm our annual and quarterly financial statements and related disclosures;

  • monitoring our internal control over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures and code of conduct;

  • overseeing our internal audit function;

  • discussing our risk management policies;

  • establishing policies regarding hiring employees from our independent registered public accounting firm and procedures for the receipt and retention of accounting related complaints and concerns;

  • meeting independently with our internal auditing staff, if any, our independent registered public accounting firm and management;


All audit and non-audit services, other than de minimis non-audit services, to be provided to us by our independent registered public accounting firm must be approved in advance by our Audit Committee.
Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Gupta is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in applicable SEC rules. We believe that the composition of our Audit Committee will meet the requirements for independence under current NASDAQ and SEC rules and regulations.
Compensation Committee
.   The members of our Compensation Committee will beare Messrs. ChangBarclay and Gupta.Garfield. Mr. Chang will beBarclay is Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Upon the closing of this offering, ourOur Compensation Committee’s responsibilities will include:






54
58

TABLE OF CONTENTS
We believe that the composition of our Compensation Committee will meetmeets the requirements for independence under current NASDAQ and SEC rules and regulations.
Nominating Committee
.   The members of our Nominating Committee will beare Messrs. Garfield and Sainer.Pan. Mr. Sainer will beGarfield is Chairman of the Nominating Committee. Upon the closing of this offering, ourOur Nominating Committee’s responsibilities will include:

  • identifying individuals qualified to become members of our Board of Directors;

  • recommending to our Board of Directors the persons to be nominated for election as directors and to each of our Board’s committees; and

  • overseeing an annual evaluation of our Board of Directors.
We believe that the composition of our Nominating Committee will meetmeets the requirements for independence under current NASDAQ and SEC rules and regulations.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of our executive officers serves as a member of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee, or other committee serving an equivalent function, of any other entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee. None of the members of our Compensation Committee has ever been employed by us.
Board Leadership Structure
Our Board is led by a Chairman who is a non-executive Director selected by the full Board on nomination of the Compensation and Nominating Committees. Our Board believes that the Chairman is responsible for Board leadership and the Chief Executive Officer is responsible for leading our management, employees and operations, and that these are two distinct and separate responsibilities. Our Board believes this leadership structure is efficient and promotes good corporate governance. However, our Board continues to evaluate its leadership structure and may change it, if, in the opinion of the Board, a change is required by the needs of our business and operations.
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer (our chief executive officer), our principal accounting officer (our chief financial officer) and other senior financial officers performing similar functions, which we refer to as the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at http://www.semlercientific.com under the Corporate Governance section of the Investors portion of our website. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is designed to meet the requirements of Item 406 of Regulation S-K. We will promptly disclose on our website (i) the nature of any amendment to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to any covered person, and (ii) the nature of any waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that is granted to one of the covered persons.
Director Compensation Summary
Prior to the adoption of our non-employee director compensation program in July 2014, we did not have a formal compensation plan for our directors. We did not pay our directors attendance fees, or grant them equity or other compensation for service on our board. During 2013 we did not pay any compensation to our directors for service on the board.
In July 2014, our board of directors approved the following non-employee director compensation.
All non-employee directors are entitled to receive an annual $30,000 retainer for service as a board member and an annual retainer for each committee on which they serve as a member:

$15,000 per year for service as chairman of the audit committee or $7,500 per year for service as a member of the audit committee;
55
59


$10,000 per year for service as chairman of the compensation committee or $5,000 per year for service as a member of the compensation committee;

$5,000 per year for service as chairman of the nominating committee or $2,000 per year for service as a member of the nominating committee;
All cash payments to non-employee directors will be paid quarterly in arrears and will be pro-rated for directors who join the board or a board committee mid-year.
All non-employee directors will be entitled to receive the following equity compensation for their services:

initial grant of options to acquire 10,000 shares of common stock, which options will be fully vested on the grant date; and

annual grant of options to acquire 5,000 shares of common stock, which options will be fully vested on the grant date.
Annual grant amounts will be pro-rated for directors who join the board mid-year. On July 24, 2014, the board of directors made the initial grant of options to acquire 10,000 shares of our common stock under our 2007 Key Person Stock Option Plan to each of our non-employee directors. All of these options have an exercise price of  $3.85 per share, expire 10 years from the grant date, and are vested in full.
The following table shows the compensation earned in the year ended December 31, 2014 by our non-employee directors. Our non-employee directors received only fees and option awards in 2014, so we have omitted certain columns from the table.
Name(1)(2)
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
Option
Awards
($)
Total
($)
Herbert J. Semler, M.D.$13,145$25,414$38,559
Bruce J Barclay31,02825,41456,442
Aidan M. Collins21,77425,41447,188
Greg S. Garfield34,40525,41459,819
Arthur “Abbie” Leibowitz, M.D., F.A.A.P.15,66725,41441,081
Wayne T. Pan, M.D., Ph.D25,59025,41451,004
Shirley L. Semler13,14525,41438,559
(1)
The compensation information for Dr. Murphy-Chutorian, our chief executive officer and a director, is set forth in “— Summary Compensation Table.”
(2)
Messrs. William H.C. Chang, Dinesh Gupta and Elliot A. Sainer served on our board of directors during 2014 but resigned from our board of directors prior to the adoption of our non-employee director compensation plan and did not receive compensation pursuant to such plan nor any other compensation in 2014.
60

Director and Executive Officer
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth information about our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2014.
Plan CategoryNumber of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
Weighted Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected in
Column (a))
(a)(b)(c)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Securityholders: 2014 Plan250,000$2.10200,000
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Securityholders: 2007 Plan399,500$1.100
Total649,500$3.20200,000
61

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the information as to compensation paid to or earned by our Chief Executive Officer and(i) chief executive officer, (ii) our two other most highly compensated executive officers during the fiscal year endedother than our chief executive officer who were serving as executive officers as of December 31, 2013.2014 and (iii) one additional individual for whom disclosure would have been provided but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer as of December 31, 2014. These individuals are referred to in this prospectus as our named executive officers. As none of our named executive officers received any stock awards, non-equity incentive plan compensation or nonqualified deferred compensation earnings during the fiscal years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, we have omitted those columns from the table.
Name and Principal PositionFiscal
Year
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Option
Award(s)
($)(1)
All Other
Compensation
($)(2)(3)
Total
($)
Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, M.D., director and chief executive officer2014$192,000$0$117,069$155,006$464,075
201332,00000286,305318,305
Robert G. McRae, chief operating officer2014218,29568,21734,43221,471342,415
2013218,29554,300020,916293,511
James M. Walker, chief financial officer(4)
201485,62500085,625
201300000
Daniel E. Conger, vice president, finance(5)
2014121,27237,8986,88614,832180,888
2013121,27230,300012,283163,858
 Name and Principal Position  Fiscal
Year
  Salary  
Bonus(2)
  Stock
Award(s)
  
Option
Award(s)(3)
  
All Other
Compensation(4)(5)
  Total 
 
Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, M.D.
Director and CEO(1)
   2013  $32,000  $0  $0  $0  $286,305  $318,305 
    2012  $0  $0  $0  $6,400  $786,116  $792,516 
 
Robert G. McRae
Chief Operating Officer
   2013  $218,295  $54,300  $0  $0  $20,915  $293,510 
    2012  $207,488  $51,975  $0  $70,200  $23,182  $352,845 
 
Daniel E. Conger
Vice President of Finance
   2013  $121,275  $30,300  $0  $0  $0  $151,575 
    2012  $115,271  $28,875  $0  $23,935  $0  $168,081 
(1)
(1)
  • Effective October 31, 2012, Dr. Semler, our current Chairman, resigned as our Chief Executive Officer and Dr. Murphy-Chutorian was appointed our Chief Executive Officer.
(2)
  • Reflects only bonus earned in fiscal 2013 and 2012. Mr. McRae and Mr. Conger were each also paid a bonus in 2012 that was earned in 2011.
(3)
  • Represents aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For more information regarding assumptions used for computation of fair value, see Note 9 to our audited financial statements, appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. Also, for 2012, includes incremental value associated with the repricing of all outstanding stock options that occurred during 2012. See Note 9 to our audited financial statements, appearing elsewhere in this prospectus for additional information.
statements.
(4)
  • (2)
For Dr. Murphy-Chutorian, represents aggregate of sales commissions ($155,006) in 2014. Represents aggregate of monthly stipend ($160,000) in 2013 and sales commissions ($126,305) earned in 2013; and in 2012, represents aggregate of monthly stipend ($192,000), sales commissions ($69,090), accrued expenses for consulting services rendered ($482,026) and fair value of warrant purchases ($43,000) earned during 2012, including amounts earned prior to being appointed as a Director in September 2012 and as Chief Executive Officer effective October 31, 2012. In 2012, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian performed consulting services, which included managing finance, sales, marketing, operational and strategic planning for our company, as well as assistance and strategic guidance in securing financing. He deferred payment of $482,026 of the invoices for his services in assistance and strategic guidance in securing financing that are booked as accrued expenses. We have agreed to pay him $150,000 of this receivable following the closing of this offering, and begin making installment payments of $30,000 per month beginning six months after the closing of this offering until such receivable is paid in full.
2013.
(5)
  • (3)
For Mr. McRae and Mr. Conger, represents payment of health insurance premiums pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement.
agreements.
Discussion of Summary
(4)
For Mr. Walker, represents payments made to The Brenner Group pursuant to our consulting agreement. Includes payments made during 2014 prior to Mr. Walker’s appointment as chief financial officer.
(5)
Effective June 18, 2014, Mr. Conger is no longer our principal accounting officer.
Named Executive Officer Compensation TableArrangements
We enter into individually negotiated compensation arrangements with each of our named executive officers. Our named executive officers may receive salary, bonus and other benefits, such as the payment of health insurance premiums or other individually negotiated health benefits pursuant to the terms of histheir negotiated compensation package. We may also grant our named executive officers awards under our equity incentive plan.plans.

Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, MDM.D.
At the time he joined our company as a Director,director, and subsequently as our Chief Executive Officer,chief executive officer, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian did not have a formal employment agreement with our company. We engaged Dr. Murphy-Chutorian as an independent contractor. Pursuant to the terms of his sales representative agreement entered into in October 2010, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian received sales commissions of  $15 per month per successfully installedsuccessfully-installed product that had an active and effective service agreement in place. After the renewal of the sales representative agreement in January 2012, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian received a monthly stipend of  $16,000, in addition to receiving sales commissions of  $15 per month per successfully installed with
62

successfully-installed product that had an active and effective service agreement in place product.place. In September 2012, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian became a Directordirector and effective October 31, 2012, he became our Chief Executive Officer.chief executive officer. On November 11, 2013, we entered into an at-will employment agreement with Dr. Murphy-Chutorian. Under the terms of thethis agreement, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian can be terminated at any time and his job titles, salaries and benefits may be modified from time to time as we deem necessary. Our current agreement withIn 2014, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian providesMurphy-Chutorian’s compensation arrangement provided for the payment of  $16,000 per month, for his services as Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer and a commission of  $15 per month per successfully installedfor each successfully-installed product that has an active and effective service agreement in place. Dr. Murphy-Chutorian iswas also eligible for awards under our equity incentive plan. In November 2012,plans. Accordingly, in recognition of2014, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian’s contributions to our company, we also agreed toMurphy-Chutorian was granted a one-time equity award of stock options under our equity incentive planoption to acquire 20,00085,000 shares of our common stock at $0.52$2.10 per share, which options expire 10-years afterexpires 10 years from the grant date and is subject to monthly vesting over four years (1/48 per month) such that it will be vested in full on the four-year anniversary of its grant date.
In addition, we oweOctober 2014, our board of directors, upon the recommendation of its compensation committee, approved the following compensation arrangement for Dr. Murphy-Chutorian consulting fees. In 2012,effective January 1, 2015: base salary of  $350,000, target incentive equal to 50% of base salary, and a grant of 75,000 stock options under our 2014 stock option plan. The payment of any target incentive will be at the discretion of the compensation committee and will be based on achievement of performance goals by Dr. Murphy-Chutorian. Dr. Murphy-Chutorian performed consulting services, which included managing finance, sales, marketing, operational and strategic planning for our company, and assistance and strategic guidance in securing financing. He deferred payment of $482,026 of the invoices for his services in assistance and strategic guidance in securing financing that are booked as accrued expenses. We have agreed to pay him $150,000 of this receivable following the closing of this offering, and begin making installment payments of $30,000 per month beginning six months after the closing of this offering until such receivable is paid in full. This consulting arrangement also represented $43,000 in fair value of warrant purchases determined to be in excess of the purchase price. See discussion under “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions — Financings” for additional information regarding this consulting arrangement. Such consulting fees for 2012 are included in the above tables under “All Other Compensation.”will no longer receive commissions based upon installed products.
Robert G. McRae
On November 1, 2010, we entered into an at-will employment agreement with Mr. McRae, our Chief Operating Officer.chief operating officer. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. McRae can be terminated at any time and his job titles, salaries and benefits may be modified from time to time as we deem necessary. Our current agreement withIn 2014, Mr. McRae providesMcRae’s compensation arrangement provided for the payment of  $18,191 per month as salary, an annual bonus of $54,300$68,217 and $1,743$1,789 per month of health benefits (consisting of insurance premiums paid on his behalf). Mr. McRae iswas also eligible for awards under our equity incentive plan.plans. Accordingly, in 2012,2014, Mr. McRae was granted a stock optionsoption to acquire 20,00025,000 shares of our common stock at $0.52$2.10 per share, and options to acquire 20,000 shares of our common stock at $4.50 per share (which were subsequently repriced to $0.52 per share), all of which options expireexpires 10 years after the grant date. In addition tofrom the grant date fair valueand is subject to monthly vesting over four years (1/48 per month) such that it will be vested in full on the four-year anniversary of his 2012 option awards, the summary compensation table also reflects the incremental value associatedits grant date.
James M. Walker
Mr. Walker provides services as our chief financial officer pursuant to a consulting agreement with the repricingThe Brenner Group, which was amended and restated effective as of June 18, 2014 to $0.52 per sharereflect Mr. Walker’s appointment as our chief financial officer. Under this consulting agreement, we agreed to pay The Brenner Group for Mr. Walker’s services a monthly fee of  $10,000 and reimburse Mr. Walker for all travel and out of Mr. McRae’s outstanding option awards (including the 20,000 granted in 2012), which were repriced at $0.52 per sharepocket expenses incurred in connection with our conversion totherewith. The consulting agreement has a C-Corporation in 2012.minimum term until March 31, 2015 and may be terminated by either party upon 30 days written notice.
Daniel E. Conger
On October 18, 2010, we entered into an at-will employment agreement with Mr. Conger, our Vice Presidentvice president of Finance.finance. Under the terms of the agreement, Mr. Conger can be terminated at any time and his job titles, salaries and benefits may be modified from time to time as we deem necessary. Our current agreement withIn 2014, Mr. Conger providesConger’s compensation arrangement provided for the payment of  $10,106 per month as salary, and an annual bonus of  $30,300.$37,898 and $1,236 per month of health benefits (consisting of insurance premiums paid on his behalf). Mr. Conger iswas also eligible for awards under our equity incentive plan.plans. Accordingly, in 2012,2014, Mr. Conger was granted a stock optionsoption to acquire 10,0005,000 shares of our common stock at $0.52$2.10 per share,
which expires 10 years from the grant date and is subject to monthly vesting over four years (1/48 per month) such that it will be vested in full on the four-year anniversary of its grant date.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
and options to acquire 6,500 shares of our common stock at $4.50 per share (which were subsequently repriced to $0.52 per share), all of which options expire 10 years after the grant date. In addition to the grant date fair value of his 2012 option awards, the summary compensation table also reflects the incremental value associated with the repricing to $0.52 per share of all of Mr. Conger’s option awards (including the 6,500 granted in 2012), which were repriced at $0.52 per share in connection with our conversion to a C-Corporation in 2012.
Equity Incentive Plan
We have one equity incentive plan, our 2007 Key Person Stock Option Plan, or the 2007 Plan, which was adopted by our Board of Directors in October 2007. The 2007 Plan is intended to provide a means for us to grant certain of our employees, directors, consultants or advisors, options to purchase shares of our common stock and thereby develop a sense of proprietorship and personal involvement in our development and financial success, and to encourage grantees to remain with and devote their best efforts to our business, thereby advancing our interests and those of our stockholders.
The 2007 Plan is administered by our Chief Executive Officer, who has the sole authority to select grantees and set the terms of awards under the 2007 Plan, except that grants to the Chief Executive Officer may be made only by the Board. Optionees are chosen based on the nature of the services rendered by such individuals, their present and potential contributions to our success and such other factors as deemed relevant.
Option awards under the 2007 Plan are evidenced by a written option agreement that contains the terms and condition of the option. Options granted under the 2007 Plan are not transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution.
The exercise price for options under the 2007 Plan may not be less than fair market value on the grant date. As defined in the 2007 Plan, fair market value of a share of our stock is equal to the average of the high and low sales prices of the stock (i) reported by the Nasdaq National Market on that date or (ii) if our common stock is listed on a national stock exchange, reported on the stock exchange composite tape on that date; or, in either case, if no prices are reported on that date, on the last preceding date on which such prices of the stock are so reported. If the common stock is traded over the counter at the time a determination of its fair market value is required to be made, its fair market value shall be deemed to be equal to the average between the reported high and low or closing bid and asked prices of stock on the most recent date on which stock was publicly traded. In the event our common stock is not publicly traded at the time a determination of its value is required to be made, the determination of its fair market value shall be made by the administrator of the 2007 Plan in such manner as deemed appropriate.
In the event of a Corporate Change (as defined in the 2007 Plan), our Board can choose to accelerate the vesting of the options, require the surrender the options upon payment for cash, make such adjustments to the outstanding options as it deems appropriate to reflect the Corporate Change, or make adjustments to outstanding options so that the option covers the number and class of shares of stock or other securities or property (including, without limitation, cash) to which the optionee would have been entitled pursuant to the terms of the agreement for the Corporate Change as if the optionee had been the holder of record of the number of shares of stock then covered by such option.
Our Board may terminate the 2007 Plan at any time and also has the right to alter or amend the plan or any part of the plan from time to time. In addition, the Chief Executive Officer, as administrator of the 2007 Plan (without the necessity of specific Board action), has the power and authority to make or approve revisions or modifications to the terms and provisions of the 2007 Plan on behalf of the Board, so long as such revisions or modifications are necessary, appropriate or desirable to effectuate the purposes of the 2007 Plan and do not effect a material change in the structure or purposes of the 2007 Plan. However, no change can be made to a granted option without the consent of the optionee, if it would impair the rights of such optionee.
All options under the 2007 Plan are required to be granted within ten years from the October 1, 2007 effective date of the 2007 Plan. As initially adopted, options to purchase up to 250,000 shares could be issued under the 2007 Plan. In January 2012, our Board increased the available number of shares under the

2007 Plan was from 250,000 to 456,500 shares. The number of shares issued or reserved pursuant to the 2007 Plan (or pursuant to outstanding awards) is subject to adjustment as a result of recapitalizations, reclassifications of our capital stock, or other changes to our capital structure.
In the quarter ended September 30, 2012, our Board amended the exercise price of all outstanding options at that time under the 2007 Plan to $0.52 per share. The expiration dates of outstanding option awards were unchanged. In the quarter ending June 30, 2013, our Board vested all outstanding options.
As of January 31, 2014 we have outstanding, fully exercisable and fully vested options to acquire a total of 337,500 shares of common stock granted under the 2007 Plan.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table provides information about the number of outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers at December 31, 2013.2014. We have omitted certain columns from the table as we do not have any outstanding stock awards or any unearned stock options, and all of our outstanding stock options have an exercise price of $0.52, are fully exercisable andawards.
NameNumber of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
Option Exercise
Price ($)
Option Expiration
Date
Douglas Murphy-Chutorian(1)
20,0000$0.5211/21/2022
Douglas Murphy-Chutorian(2)
3,08481,916$2.1011/08/2024
Robert G. McRae(1)
20,0000$0.5211/1/2020
Robert G. McRae(1)
20,0000$0.526/10/2021
Robert G. McRae(1)
20,0000$0.521/5/2022
Robert G. McRae(1)
20,0000$0.5211/21/2022
Robert G. McRae(2)
90724,093$2.1011/08/2024
James M. Walker00$0N/A
Daniel E. Conger(1)
6,5000$0.5211/1/2020
Daniel E. Conger(1)
6,5000$0.526/10/2021
Daniel E. Conger(1)
6,5000$0.521/5/2022
Daniel E. Conger(1)
10,0000$0.5211/21/2022
Daniel E. Conger(2)
1814,819$2.1011/08/2024
(1)
The option is fully vested.
 Name  
Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options (#)
Exercisable
  
Option Exercise
Price ($)
  
Option Expiration
Date
 
 
Dr. Douglas Murphy-Chutorian
   20,000  $0.52   11/21/2022 
 
Robert G. McRae
   20,000  $0.52   11/1/2020 
 
Robert G. McRae
   20,000  $0.52   6/10/2021 
 
Robert G. McRae
   20,000  $0.52   1/5/2022 
 
Robert G. McRae
   20,000  $0.52   11/21/2022 
 
Daniel E. Conger
   6,500  $0.52   11/1/2020 
 
Daniel E. Conger
   6,500  $0.52   6/10/2021 
 
Daniel E. Conger
   6,500  $0.52   1/5/2022 
 
Daniel E. Conger
   10,000  $0.52   11/21/2022 
(2)
Director Compensation
We do not have a formal compensation plan for our Directors. We do not pay our Directors attendance fees, nor do we grant them equity or other compensation for service on our Board. We may adopt a compensation plan for our non-employee DirectorsThe option is subject to monthly vesting over four years (1/48 per month) such that it will be vested in the future. During the last fiscal year we did not pay any compensation to our directors for servicefull on the Board.four-year anniversary of its grant date, which was November 8, 2014.
59
64

Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of January 31, 2014 of:
  • each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock;
  • each of our Directors;
  • each of our named executive officers; and
  • all of our Directors and executive officers as a group.
The column entitled “Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned — Before Offering” is based on a total of 786,750 shares of our common stock outstanding as of January 31, 2014 and assumes the conversion of all outstanding convertible preferred stock into 2,012,152 shares of our common stock upon the closing of this offering but does not assume the cashless exercise of outstanding warrants upon the closing of this offering. The column entitled “Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned — After Offering” is based on 4,602,147 shares of our common stock to be outstanding after this offering, including the 2,012,152 shares of common stock issued upon automatic conversion of all outstanding convertible preferred stock, the cashless exercise of outstanding warrants and subsequent conversion of the preferred stock into an aggregate of 623,245 shares of common stock (based on assumed initial public offer price of $8.50 per share, which is the midpoint of the price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus) and 1,180,000 shares of our common stock that we are selling in this offering, but not including any additional shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options or warrants that will not be cashless exercised upon the closing of this offering.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Director, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian, has indicated an interest in purchasing up to 35,400 shares of our common stock in this offering at the initial public offering price. However, because an indication of interest is not a binding agreement or commitment to purchase, the underwriters may determine to sell more, less or no shares in this offering to Dr. Murphy-Chutorian, or Dr. Murphy-Chutorian may determine to purchase more, less or no shares in this offering. See “Underwriting” for a full description of compensation payable to the underwriters. The following table does not reflect any potential purchases by this executive officer, director and stockholder.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to our common stock. Shares of our common stock subject to options or warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after January 31, 2014 are considered outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding the options or warrants for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of that person but not for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as otherwise noted, the persons and entities in the following table have sole voting and investing power with respect to all of the shares of our common stock beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws, where applicable. Except as otherwise set forth in the footnotes to the following table, the address of each beneficial owner is c/o Semler Scientific, Inc., 2330 NW Everett St. Portland, OR 97210.
 Name and Address of Beneficial Owner  
Number of Shares
of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
  Percentage of Shares
Beneficially Owned
 
 Before Offering  
After Offering(a)
  Before Offering  After Offering 
 
5% Stockholders
                 
 
GPG SSF Investments LLC(1)
   300,125   232,029   10.2%   5.0% 
 
Eric Semler(2)
   562,669   449,594   18.6%   9.8% 
 
Named Executive Officers and Directors:
                  
 
Dr. & Mrs. Semler(3)
   804,946   774,430   26.8%   16.3% 
 
William H.C. Chang(4)
   1,011,648   773,455   31.1%   16.8% 
 
Greg S. Garfield(5)
   12,000   12,000   *   * 
 
Dinesh Gupta(6)
   157,500   135,882   5.5%   3.0% 
 
Dr. Douglas Murphy-Chutorian(7)
   256,214   256,214   8.4%   5.3% 
 
Elliot A. Sainer(8)
   31,050   26,788   1.1%   * 
 
Robert G. McRae(9)
   80,000   80,000   2.8%   1.7% 
 
Daniel E. Conger(10)
   29,500   29,500   1.0%   * 
 
All Directors and Officers as a group (9 persons)(11)
   2,382,858   2,088,269   61.2%   40.7% 

*
  • less than 1%
(a)
  • We are selling all of the shares being offered hereby. Decreases in number of shares of common stock beneficially owned before and after offering are due to the cashless exercise of warrants immediately prior to the closing of this offering.
(1)
  • Represents 171,500 shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of 171,500 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, and warrants to purchase 128,625 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock (which warrants will be cashlessly exercised immediately prior to this offering for shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, which shares will automatically convert into shares of our common stock in connection with this offering) exercisable within 60 days. Voting control over shares beneficially owned by GPG SSF Investments LLC is held by Greenpark and Golf Ventures, LLC, its managing member. The two principals of Greenpark and Golf Ventures, LLC are Clay Heighten, M.D. and Carl Soderstrom, M.D.
(2)
  • Represents 40,000 issued shares of our common stock, 173,668 shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of 173,668 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and 125,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of 125,000 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and warrants to purchase 130,251 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, and warrants to purchase 93,750 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock (all of which warrants will be cashlessly exercised immediately prior to this offering for shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and Series A-1 Preferred Stock, which shares will automatically convert into shares of our common stock in connection with this offering) exercisable within 60 days.
(3)
  • Represents 597,306 issued shares of our common stock, options to purchase 150,000 shares of our common stock exercisable within 60 days and warrants to purchase 57,640 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock (which warrants will be cashlessly exercised immediately prior to this offering for shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, which shares will automatically convert into shares of our common stock in connection with this offering) exercisable within 60 days. Stock options are held by Dr. Semler. Other securities are held in a family trust over which Dr. and Mrs. Semler are co-Trustees and together share voting and investment power over such securities.
(4)
  • Represents 30,000 issued shares of our common stock, 417,781 shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of 417,781 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, 64,583 shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of 64,583 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock and 41,667 shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of 41,667 shares of our Series A-2 Preferred Stock, and warrants to purchase 388,336 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 69,281 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock (all of which warrants will be cashlessly exercised immediately prior to this offering for shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and Series A-1 Preferred Stock, which shares will automatically convert into shares of our common stock in connection with this offering) exercisable within 60 days. Mr. Chang holds his securities in a family trust over which he his co-Trustee with his spouse, and with whom he shares voting and investment power over such securities.
(5)
  • Represents warrants to purchase 12,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock (which will become exercisable for shares of our common stock in connection with this offering) exercisable within 60 days. Mr. Garfield holds his securities in a family trust over which he is co-Trustee with his spouse, and with whom he shares voting and investment power over such securities.
(6)
  • Represents 116,667 shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of 116,667 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, and warrants to purchase 40,833 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock (which warrants will be cashlessly exercised immediately prior to this offering for shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, which shares will automatically convert into shares of our common stock in connection with this offering) exercisable within 60 days. Includes shares of Series A Preferred Stock held by Satwik Mezzanine Fund I, LLC, for which Mr. Gupta is a general partner and an investor, and warrants to acquire Series A Preferred Stock held by First Guardian Group I, LLC, for which Mr. Gupta is a general partner and an investor. Mr. Gupta disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities

except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Also includes 11,111 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and warrants to acquire 3,889 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock that are held by Satwik Ventures I, LLC Defined Benefit Pension Plan for the benefit of Mr. Gupta.
(7)
  • Represents options to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock exercisable within 60 days, warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of our Series A-2 Preferred Stock, warrants to purchase 16,875 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and warrants to purchase 194,339 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock (all of which warrants will become exercisable for shares of our common stock in connection with this offering) exercisable within 60 days.
(8)
  • Represents 23,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of 23,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 8,050 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock (which warrants will be cashlessly exercised immediately prior to this offering for shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, which shares will automatically convert into shares of our common stock in connection with this offering) exercisable within 60 days. Mr. Sainer holds his securities in a family trust over which he is co-Trustee with his spouse, and with whom he shares voting and investment power over such securities.
(9)
  • Represents options to purchase 80,000 shares of our common stock exercisable within 60 days.
(10)
  • Represents options to purchase 29,500 shares of our common stock exercisable within 60 days.
(11)
  • Represents 627,306 issued shares of our common stock, 557,448 shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of 557,448 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, 64,583 shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of 64,583 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock and 250,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of 41,667 shares of our Series A-2 Preferred Stock; options to purchase 279,500 shares of our common stock exercisable within 60 days, and warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of our Series A-2 Preferred Stock, warrants to purchase 86,156 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and warrants to purchase 701,198 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock (453,984 of which warrants will be cashlessly exercised immediately prior to this offering for shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and Series A-1 Preferred Stock, which shares will automatically convert into shares of our common stock in connection with this offering; and 248,214 of which warrants will become exercisable for shares of our common stock in connection with this offering) exercisable within 60 days.

Certain Relationships and Related TransactionsCERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The following includes a summary of transactions since January 1, 20112013 to which we have been a party in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed the lesser of  (x) $120,000 or (y) 1% of our average total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any of our Directors,directors, executive officers or, to our knowledge, beneficial owners of more than 5% of our capital stock or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than equity and other compensation, termination, change in control and other arrangements, which are described under “Management — Summary Compensation Table — Discussion of Summary Compensation Table —Named Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements.” We also describe below certain other transactions with our Directors,directors, executive officers and stockholders.
Financings
During 2011, we issued an aggregate of 169,447 shares of common stock for cash amounting to $725,000.
During 2012, we issued an aggregate of 27,778 shares of common stock associated with 20,834 warrants to buy common stock for cash amounting to $125,209.
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we changed from an S Corporation to a C Corporation and in connection therewith, we entered into an exchange agreement (“Exchange Agreement”) with certain of the holders of our common stock and outstanding warrants to acquire our common stock, pursuant to which such holders exchanged their shares and warrants into and for shares of, and warrants to acquire, our newly created Series A Preferred Stock, Series A-1 Preferred Stock and/or Series A-2 Preferred Stock in amounts that were determined in such negotiations. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, we exchanged 1,459,725 shares of our common stock and warrants to acquire 358,733 shares of our common stock into (A) 786,750 shares of common stock, (B) 129,225 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, (C) 293,750 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and (D) 250,000 shares of Series A-2 Preferred Stock, and warrants to acquire an aggregate of 583,441 shares of our convertible preferred stock.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 807,067 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and warrants to acquire an aggregate of 702,398 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $3,633,453.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued an aggregate of 532,110 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and warrants to acquire an aggregate of 298,241 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock for an aggregate gross purchase price of  $2,409,404.
The participants in the foregoing equity financingsfinancing included certain of our current Directors,and former directors, officers and holders of more than 5% of our capital stock or entities affiliated with them.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, we issued an aggregate of 50,000 shares of our common stock to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, is one of the co-trustees, for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000 in cash.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, we issued to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, is one of the co-trustees, (i) a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 44,445 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrant expires 5 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $444 in cash, and (ii) a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 20,844 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $4 per share, which warrant expires 5 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $208 in cash.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, we issued Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, MD, who later was appointed a Director and Chief Executive Officer, two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 20,834 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $4.00 per share, which warrants expire 12 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $208 in cash.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we issued an aggregate of 44,445 shares of our common stock to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, is one of the co-trustees, for an aggregate purchase price of $200,002 in cash.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we issued Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, MD, who later was appointed a Director and Chief Executive Officer, three warrants to purchase an aggregate of 16,390 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 12 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $164 in cash.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 27,778 shares of our common stock to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, is one of the co-trustees, for an aggregate purchase price of $125,001 in cash.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2012, we issued to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, is one of the co-trustees, a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 20,834 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrant expires 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $208 in cash.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2012, we issued Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, MD, who later was appointed a Director and Chief Executive Officer, a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 10,556 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrant expires 12 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $106 in cash.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, in accordance with the Exchange Agreement, Dr. Herbert J. Semler and Mrs. Shirley Semler were issued an aggregate of 786,750 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 57,640 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock; the accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang is one of the co-trustees was issued an aggregate of 250,000 shares of our Series A-2 Preferred Stock, 81,250 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock, 72,223 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, warrants to buy an aggregate of 69,281 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and warrants to buy an aggregate of 173,612 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock; Mr. Eric Semler was issued an aggregate 125,000 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock, 7,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, warrants to buy an aggregate of 93,750 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and warrants to buy an aggregate of 5,250 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock; and Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, MD, was issued warrants to buy an aggregate of 25,000 shares of our Series A-2 Preferred Stock, warrants to buy an aggregate of 16,875 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock and warrants to buy an aggregate of 38,907 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 234,446 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, is one of the co-trustees, for an aggregate purchase price of $1,055,007 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we issued to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, is one of the co-trustees, three warrants to purchase an aggregate of 175,835 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $224 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 171,500 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to GPG SSF Investments, LLC, a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our capital stock, for an aggregate purchase price of $771,750 in cash.
During the quarter ending September 30, 2012, we issued to GPG SSF Investments, LLC, a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our capital stock, two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 128,625 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $13 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 166,668 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to Mr. Eric Semler, a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our capital stock and the son of our co-founders and Directors, Dr. and Mrs. Semler, for an aggregate purchase price of $750,006 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we issued to Mr. Eric Semler, a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our capital stock and the son of our co-founders and Directors, Dr. and Mrs. Semler, two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 125,001 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $838 in cash.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we issued Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, MD, who later was appointed a Director and Chief Executive Officer, two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 95,432 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 12 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $10 in cash. In June 2013, these warrants were amended and now expire July 31, 2016.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued an aggregate of 111,112 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to an accredited investor for which a Directorformer director of our company and one of our principal stockholders, Mr. William H.C. Chang, is one of the co-trustees, for an aggregate purchase price of  $500,004 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued to an accredited investor for which a Directorformer director of our company and one of our principal stockholders, Mr. William H.C. Chang, is one of the co-trustees, a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 38,889 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of  $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of  $4 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued an aggregate of 116,667 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to two accredited investors for which Mr. Dinesh Gupta, who later was appointed a Director,former director, is a general partner or a trustee respectively, for an aggregate purchase price of  $525,001 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued to two accredited investors for which Mr. Dinesh Gupta, who later was appointed a Director,former director, is a general partner or a trustee respectively, two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 40,833 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of  $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of  $3,695 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued to Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, MD,M.D., our Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer and a Directordirector of our company, a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 60,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of  $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of  $6,000 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued an aggregate of 23,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to Mr. Elliot Sainer, who later was appointed a Director,former director, for an aggregate purchase price of  $103,500 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued to Mr. Elliot A. Sainer, who later was appointed a Director,former director, a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 8,050 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrant expires 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of  $1 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued to Mr. Greg S. Garfield, who later was appointed a Director,director, a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 12,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of  $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of  $1,200 in cash.
On February 24, 2015, a family trust of which William H.C. Chang, a former director and one of our principal stockholders, is a co-Trustee acquired an aggregate of 55,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement pursuant to a stock purchase agreement with us dated February 24, 2015, at a price per share of  $4.52, the consolidated closing bid price on the date of the agreement. Such shares were acquired using personal funds (approximately $248,600).
65

On March 2, 2015, a family trust of which William H.C. Chang, a former director and one of our principal stockholders, is a co-Trustee acquired an aggregate of 62,500 shares of our common stock in a private placement pursuant to a stock purchase agreement with us dated March 2, 2015, at a price per share of  $4.10. Such shares were acquired using personal funds (approximately $250,000).
On April 1, 2015, we issued and sold an aggregate of 143,000 shares of our common stock to an accredited investor and significant stockholder, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement for an aggregate purchase price of  $500,500.
Transactions Related to Our Initial Public Offering
In connection with the closing of our initial public offering on February 27, 2014, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian, our chief executive officer and a director, and William H.C. Chang, a former director and one of our principal stockholders, purchased 53,571 shares and 89,285 shares of our common stock, respectively, at the initial public offering price for aggregate purchase prices of  $374,997 and $624,995, respectively. In addition, Eric Semler, one of our principal stockholders, or entities affiliated with Mr. Semler, purchased 142,857 shares of our common stock in the offering at the initial public offering price for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1 million.
Consulting Fees for Services Provided
Prior to becoming a Directordirector and then Chief Executive Officer chief executive officer of our company, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian performed consulting services for us. These consulting services included managing finance, sales, marketing, operational and strategic planning for our company, as well as assistance and strategic guidance in securing financing. Between November 3, 2010 and September 17, 2012, and prior to his appointment to our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors (and later as our Chief Executive Officer)chief executive officer), Dr. Murphy-Chutorian invoiced us an aggregate amount of  $722,026 in consulting fees in connection with these consulting services provided to our company ($75,000, $165,000, $482,026 recorded in 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively)., payment of which was deferred by Dr. Murphy-Chutorian. We paid Dr. Murphy-Chutorian has deferred payment$150,000 of his invoices and accordingly, such invoices remain unpaid. However, we have agreed that we will pay $150,000 of this receivable following the closing of thisour initial public offering, and beginbegan making installment payments of  $30,000 per month beginning six months after the closing of this offeringAugust 2014. We will continue to make such installment payments until such receivable is paid in full.
InvestorRegistration Rights Agreement
In connection with the June 2012 exchange described above under “— Financings,” we entered intoWe are party to an investor rights agreement with all of thethose holders ofwho held our common stock prior to our initial public offering, and those who held our convertible preferred stock. All

investorsstock prior to our initial public offering (all of which converted into common stock in our company subsequentinitial public offering). Accordingly, our directors and principal stockholders who held our securities prior to June 2012 have joined this agreement. Accordingly, all of our current Directors (or entities affiliated with them)initial public offering are parties to this agreement. This agreement provides for certain rights relating to the registration of their shares of common stock issuablethat was issued upon conversion of their convertible preferred stock, a right of first refusal to purchase future securities sold by us and certain additional covenants made by us. The right of first refusal and certain additional covenants will terminate upon completion of this offering.stock. The registration rights will continue following this offering and will terminate five years following the completion of thisor our initial public offering, or for any particular holder with registration rights, at such time following this offering when all securities held by that stockholder subject to registration rights may be sold pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act during any ninety (90) day90-day period. These registration rights have been waived in connection
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with this offering. See “Description of Securities — Registration Rights” for additional information.
Voting Agreement
In connection with the June 2012 exchange described above under “— Financings,” we entered into a voting agreement with all of the holders of our common stock and convertible preferred stock. All investors in our company subsequent to June 2012 have joined this agreement. Accordingly, all of our current Directors (or entities affiliated with them) are parties to this agreement. Pursuant to the voting agreement, the following Directors were each elected to serve as members on our Board of Directors: Herbert Semler and Shirley Semler (as representatives of holders of our common stock, as designated by a majority of our common stockholders), and Douglas Murphy-Chutorian and William Chang (as representatives of holders of our Series A Preferred Stock).
The voting agreement will terminate upon the closing of this offering, and members previously elected to our Board of Directors pursuant to this agreement will continue to serve as directors until they resign, are removed or their successors are duly elected by holders of our common stock. The composition of our Board of Directors after this offering is described in more detail under “Management — Board of Directors and Executive Officers.”
Semler HealthPerks, Inc.
In October 2012, Dr. Semler, our co-founder and Chairman of the Board, formed a new corporate entity, Semler HealthPerks, Inc., a business developed together with two of our former employees. Semler HealthPerks, Inc. is developing an exercise-related cell phone application for the consumer market. Because we did not view this business as complementary to our current plans and strategy, our Board waived any corporate opportunity and any intellectual property rights with regard to certain intellectual property developed by Dr. Semler and our former employees to Semler HealthPerks, Inc. and waived any non-solicitation with regard to the hiring by Semler HealthPerks, Inc. of our former employees. Our stockholders were given the opportunity to buy into the Semler HealthPerks, Inc. on a pro rata basis for fair market value.
On October 31, 2012, in connection with the creation of Semler HealthPerks, Inc., we extended a loan to it for which Semler HealthPerks, Inc. issued a promissory note obliging it to pay us the sum of $191,222.47, together with interest at the rate of 6.0% per annum, on our demand on or after the promissory note’s maturity date. Under the terms of the promissory note, the maturity date is the earlier of October 31, 2017 or the consummation by Semler HealthPerks, Inc. of a transaction or series of transactions selling its equity securities for the primary purpose of raising working capital and which sales result in aggregate gross proceeds to Semler HealthPerks, Inc. of not less than $2,000,000. We wrote off the principal and interest on this promissory note as of December 31, 2012 due to the uncertain nature of start-up enterprises and the fact that we have no personal guarantee or security interest supporting the note. Subsequently, we forgave repayment of this note and it is no longer outstanding.
Director Loan Guarantees
In 2011, Dr. & Mrs. Semler, our co-founders and Directors, as well as Mr. Chang, a Director, personally guaranteed various loans or leases for our company as follows:
On February 9, 2011, we entered into an Equipment Finance Agreement with U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group pursuant to which we obtained a $39,000 secured loan for a 48-month term that has an annual fixed interest rate of 13%. The loan is secured by the related leased equipment and is personally guaranteed by Dr. & Mrs. Semler.

On May 27, 2011, we entered into an additional Equipment Finance Agreement with U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group pursuant to which we obtained a $109,000 secured loan for a 60-month term that has an annual fixed interest rate of 6%. The loan is secured by the related leased equipment and is personally guaranteed by Dr. and Mrs. Semler.
At various dates in 2011, we entered into Lease Agreements with Lease Corporation of America, pursuant to which we obtained an aggregate amount of $66,000 for a 60-month term that have variable annual interest rates of approximately 14%. The leases are secured by the related leased equipment and personally guaranteed by Mr. Chang.
On June 17, 2011, we entered into a loan agreement with First Republic Bank pursuant to which we obtained a $150,000 secured loan for a 60-month term that has a variable annual interest rate based on First Republic’s Prime plus a spread of 1.75% and a floor of 3.25%. The initial interest rate was 5%. This loan is personally guaranteed by Mr. Chang.
On September 13, 2011, we entered into an additional loan agreement with First Republic Bank pursuant to which we obtained a $150,000 loan for a 60-month term that has a variable annual interest rate based on First Republic’s Prime plus a spread of 1.75% and a floor of 3.25%. The initial annual interest rate was 5%. This loan is personally guaranteed by Mr. Chang.
For additional information relating to these loans or leases, see Note 7 to our audited financial statements, appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
In consideration for the personal guarantees, these Directors were given the opportunity to purchase fully vested warrants exercisable for common stock. Accordingly, during the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we issued Dr. Herbert J. Semler, our Chairman and co-founder, two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 57,640 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 12 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $58 in cash; and during the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we issued to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, serves as a co-trustee, two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 92,188 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 10 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $92 in cash. All of these warrants were subsequently exchanged for warrants to purchase shares of our preferred stock pursuant to the Exchange Agreement described above.
Participation in this OfferingRelated Persons
Our Chief Executive Officer and Director, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian, has indicated an interest in purchasing up to 35,400 sharesboard of our common stock in this offering at the initial public offering price for an aggregate purchase price of up to $300,900 (at $8.50 per share, the midpoint of the range on the cover page of this prospectus). However, because an indication of interest is not a binding agreement or commitment to purchase, the underwriters may determine to sell more, less or no shares in this offering to Dr. Murphy-Chutorian, or Dr. Murphy-Chutorian may determine to purchase more, less or no shares in this offering. See “Underwriting” for a full description of compensation payable to the underwriters.
Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions
Our Board of Directorsdirectors has adopted a written related person transaction policy to be effective upon the consummation of this offering, setting forth the policies and procedures for the review and approval or ratification of related-person transactions. This policy will cover,covers, with certain exceptions set forth in Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act, any transaction, arrangement or relationship, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships in which we were or are to be a participant, where the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and a related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, including, without limitation, purchases of goods or services by or from the related person or entities in which the related person has a material interest, indebtedness, guarantees of indebtedness and employment by us of a related person. In reviewing and approving any such transactions, our audit committee is tasked to consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including, but not limited to, whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in an arm’s length transaction and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction. All of the transactions described in this section occurred prior to the adoption of this policy.
66

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 31, 2015 of:

each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock;

each of our directors;

each of our named executive officers; and

all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to our common stock and is based on 4,833,517 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2015. Shares of our common stock subject to options or warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days after March 31, 2015 are considered outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding the options or warrants for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of that person but not for the purpose of calculating the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as otherwise noted, the persons and entities in the following table have sole voting and investing power with respect to all of the shares of our common stock beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws, where applicable. Information with respect to beneficial ownership by 5% stockholders has been based on information filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(d) or Section 13(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as company records. Except as otherwise set forth in the footnotes to the following table, the address of each beneficial owner is c/o Semler Scientific, Inc., 2330 NW Everett St. Portland, OR 97210.
Name and Address of Beneficial OwnerNumber of
Shares Beneficially
Owned
Percentage of
Shares Beneficially
Owned
5% Stockholders:
William H.C. Chang(1)
931,97319.3%
Eric Semler568,22111.8%
Glenhill Advisors, LLC(2)
341,4597.1%
Green Park & Golf Ventures, LLC(3)
253,6865.2%
Executive Officers and Directors:
Dr. & Mrs. Semler(4)
727,89114.5%
Bruce J Barclay(5)
10,000*%
Aidan M. Collins(6)
10,000*%
Greg S. Garfield(7)
22,000*%
Dr. Arthur N. Leibowitz(8)
10,000*%
Dr. Douglas Murphy-Chutorian(9)
479,7859.1%
Dr. Wayne T. Pan(10)
10,000*%
Robert G. McRae(11)
105,0002.1%
Daniel E. Conger(12)
34,500*%
James M. Walker0
All directors and officers as a group (11 persons)1,409,17625.1%
*
less than 1%
(1)
Mr. Chang holds his securities in a family trust over which he his co-Trustee with his spouse, and with whom he shares voting and investment power over such securities.
67

(2)
Represents 341,459 shares of common stock held by Glenhill Advisors, LLC, Glenn J. Krevlin, Glenhill Capital Advisors, LLC, Glenhill Capital Management, LLC and Glenhill Concentrated Long Masterfund, LLC. Glenn J. Krevlin, is the managing member and control person of Glenhill Advisors, LLC, and is the sole shareholder of Krevlin Management, Inc. Krevlin Management, Inc. is the managing member of Glenhill Capital Advisors, LLC, which is the investment manager of Glenhill Concentrated Long Master Fund, LLC. Glenhill Advisors, LLC is the managing member of Glenhill Capital Management, LLC. Glenhill Capital Management, LLC is the managing member of Glenhill Concentrated Long Master Fund, LLC. The address of each of Glenhill Advisors, LLC, Glenn J. Krevlin, Glenhill Capital Advisors, LLC, Glenhill Capital Management, LLC and Glenhill Concentrated Long Masterfund, LLC is Fifth Avenue, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10020.
(3)
Represents (i) 214,736 shares held directly by GPG SSF Investments LLC, or GPG SSF and (ii) 38,950 shares held directly by Green Park & Golf Ventures, LLC, or Green Park & Golf. Green Park & Golf is the managing partner of GPG SSF and consequently may be deemed to have voting control and investment discretion over securities owned by GPG SSF. Clay M. Heighten, M.D. and Carl D. Soderstrom are each a managing director of Green Park & Golf. As a result, Dr. Heighten and Mr. Soderstrom may each be deemed to be the beneficial owner of any shares deemed to be beneficially owned by Green Park & Golf and/or GPG SSF. Each of Green Park & Golf, Dr. Heighten and Mr. Soderstrom disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities directly owned by GPG SSF, except to the extent of its or his pecuniary interests therein. Each of Dr. Heighten and Mr. Soderstrom disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities directly owned by Green Park & Golf, except to the extent of his pecuniary interests therein. The principal business address of each Reporting Person is c/o Green Park & Golf Ventures, LLC, 5910 N. Central Expressway, Suite 200, Dallas, Texas, 75206.
(4)
Represents (i) 557,891 issued shares of our common stock, (ii) options to purchase 160,000 shares of our common stock held by Dr. Semler and (iii) options to purchase 10,000 shares of our common stock held by Mrs. Semler. Shares of common stock are held in a family trust over which Dr. and Mrs. Semler are co-Trustees and together share voting and investment power over such securities.
(5)
Represents options to acquire 10,000 shares of our common stock.
(6)
Represents options to acquire 10,000 shares of our common stock.
(7)
Represents (i) options to acquire 10,000 shares of our common stock and (ii) warrants to purchase 12,000 shares of our common stock. Mr. Garfield holds his warrants in a family trust over which he is co-Trustee with his spouse, and with whom he shares voting and investment power over such securities.
(8)
Represents options to acquire 10,000 shares of our common stock.
(9)
Represents (i) 63,571 shares of our common stock (ii) options to purchase 180,000 shares of our common stock, and (iii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 236,214 shares of our common stock. Options are held by Dr. Murphy-Chutorian. Other securities are held in a family trust over which Dr. Murphy-Chutorian is co-Trustee with his spouse, and with whom he shares voting and investment power over such securities.
(10)
Represents options to acquire 10,000 shares of our common stock.
(11)
Represents options to acquire 105,000 shares of our common stock.
(12)
Represents options to acquire 34,500 shares of our common stock.
68

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following description of our capital stock is not complete and may not contain all the information you should consider before investing in our capital stock. This description is summarized from, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, our certificate of incorporation, which has been publicly filed with the SEC. See “Where You Can Find More Information; Incorporation by Reference.”
General
As of January 31, 2014, ourOur authorized capital stock consistedconsists of 50,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, per share, and 4,000,000 shares of convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value, per share, of which 2,800,000 shares arehave been designated as Series A Preferred Stock, 800,000 shares arehave been designated as Series A-1 Preferred Stock and 400,000 shares arehave been designated as Series A-2 Preferred Stock. All issued and outstanding designated shares of preferred stock converted into shares of our common stock in our initial public offering and are no longer outstanding.
As of JanuaryMarch 31, 2014,2015, there are 786,750were a total of 4,833,517 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, 1,468,402 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock issued and outstanding, 293,750 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock issued and outstanding, and 250,000 shares of our Series A-2 Preferred Stock issued andoutstanding. We currently do not have any preferred stock outstanding.
Common Stock
Holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share. Except as otherwise required by law, and subject to the rights of the holders of preferred stock, if any, all stockholder action is taken by the vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock and preferred stock voting as a single class present at a meeting of stockholders at which a quorum consisting of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock and preferred stock is present in person or proxy.
Subject to the prior rights of any class or series of preferred stock, holders of our common stock are entitled to receive ratably, dividends when, as, and if declared by our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors out of funds legally available for that purpose and, upon our liquidation, dissolution, or winding up, are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities and payment of accrued dividends and liquidation preferences on the preferred stock. However, the current policy of our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors is to retain earnings, if any, for the operation and expansion of our company. The holders of our common stock have no preemptive rights and have no rights to convert their common stock into any other securities. The outstanding common stock is validly authorized and issued, fully-paid and nonassessable. The common stock will not be subject to call or redemption.
Preferred Stock
TheWe currently have no outstanding shares of preferred stock. Under the terms of our Series A Preferred Stock, Series A-1 Preferred Stock and Series A-2 Preferred Stock provide the following:
1) Dividends.   Holders of the Series A Preferred Stock, Series A-1 Preferred Stock and Series A-2 Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cumulative dividends at the rate of $0.36 per share, $0.32 per share and $0.16 per share, respectively, all payable as and if declared by our Board of Directors.
2) Voting Rights.   Except as provided in our certificate of incorporation, or as required by law, holders our board of directors has the authority to issue up to 4,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series, to fix the dividend, voting and common stock vote togetherother rights, preferences and privileges of the shares of each wholly unissued series and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereon, and to increase or decrease the number of shares of any such series, but not as separate classes, on an as-converted basis. Ourbelow the number of shares of such series then outstanding. Prior to the issuance of shares of each series, the board of directors is required by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and our certificate of incorporation does not provideto adopt resolutions and file a certificate of designation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. The certificate of designation fixes for each class or series voting. So long as at least 100,000the designations, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions, including dividend rights, conversion rights, redemption privileges and liquidation preferences. At the time of our initial public offering, we had issued and outstanding, the following shares of preferred stock: 1,468,402 shares of Series A, Preferred Stock remain outstanding, 2 members of our Board of Directors will be elected by the holders of a majority of the outstanding Series A Preferred Stock.
3) Liquidation.   Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of our company, the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to receive a liquidation preference in the amount of $4.50 per share prior and in preference to all other stockholders, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. Thereafter, the holders293,750 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock and Series A-2 Preferred Stock are entitled to receive a liquidation preference in the amount of $4.00 per share and $2.00 per share, respectively, prior and in preference to holders of common stock, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends.
4) Conversion Rights.   Each share250,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series A-1 Preferred StockA-2. All of these previously issued andSeries A-2 Preferred Stock is convertible at the option of the holder into that number of shares of common stock determined by the Conversion Rate (as set out in our certificate of incorporation), which currently is one-to-one.
5) Automatic Conversion.   Each share of Series A Preferred Stock, Series A-1 Preferred Stock and Series A-2 Preferred Stock shall be automatically converted upon (i) the written request from each of the Requisite Holders (as such term is defined in our certificate of incorporation) and the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock (on an as-converted basis) or

(ii) the closing of a firm commitment underwritten initial public offering pursuant to an effective registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided that the offering price per share is not less than $22.50 (as adjusted in accordance with the mechanics provided in our certificate of incorporation) and our aggregate gross proceeds are not less than $30,000,000. Upon such conversion, each share of Series A Preferred Stock, Series A-1 Preferred Stock and Series A-2 Preferred Stock shall be convertible into that number of shares of common stock determined by the Conversion Rate, which currently is one-to-one.
The Requisite Holders (currently our Director, Mr. Chang, and our significant stockholder, Eric Semler) and holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock (on an as-converted basis) have requested that such shares be automatically converted into shares of our common stock upon the closing of thisin our initial public offering. Accordingly, we will issue approximately 2,012,152 shares of our common stock upon automatic conversion of all of our outstanding convertible preferred stock (exclusive of the shares of common stock to be issued upon automatic conversion of the convertible preferred stock to be issued upon net exercise of our outstanding warrants as described below under “— Warrants”) and no shares of convertible preferred stock will be outstanding following the completion of this offering.
Stock Options
As of January 31, 2014 we had reserved 456,500 shares for our stock option plan, and have issued and outstanding options to acquire an aggregate 337,500 shares of our common stock. No options issued under our plan have been exercised.
Warrants
As of JanuaryMarch 31, 2014,2015, we had outstanding warrants to acquire an aggregate 25,000 shares of our Series A-2 Preferred Stock, an aggregate 245,531 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and an aggregate 1,313,549 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, all of which are immediately exercisable. Aside from warrants to acquire an aggregate 25,000 shares of our Series A-2 Preferred Stock, warrants to acquire an aggregate 16,875 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and warrants to acquire an aggregate 246,339 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, all of our warrants provide that such warrants shall be exercised on a cashless basis immediately prior to the closing of a firm commitment initial public offering with the fair market value per share based on the per share offering price. Accordingly, assuming an initial public offering price of $8.50 (which is the midpoint of the price range on the cover page of this prospectus), we will issue approximately 623,245359,714 shares of our common stock upon the cashlessat a weighted average exercise price of  all of such warrants$5.15 per share, and subsequent automatic conversion of the convertible preferred stockwhich expire in connection with the closing of this offering. The warrantsdates ranging from July 2016 to purchase Series A, A-1 and A-2 Preferred Stock that will not be exercised on a cashless basis prior to the closing this offering will remain outstanding but will be exercisable for shares of our common stock upon the closing of this offering and automatic conversion of the convertible preferred stock in accordance with their terms.June 2023.
Representative’s
69

Placement Agent’s Warrants
Please see “Underwriting — Representative’s Warrants”“Plan of Distribution” for a description of the warrants we have agreed to issue to the representative of the underwritersplacement agent in this offering, subject to the completion of the offering. We expect to enter into a warrant agreement in respect of the Representative’s Warrantsplacement agent’s warrants prior to the closing of this offering.
Registration Rights
Pursuant to the investorinvestors’ rights agreement, entered into indated June 7, 2012 described above under “— Investorbetween our company and the investors named therein, or the Investors’ Rights Agreement, and subject to the current holdersterms of the Investors’ Rights Agreement, certain of our outstandingholders our shares of common stock Series A Preferred Stock, Series A-1 Preferred Stock and Series A-2 Preferred Stock, haveoutstanding received certain registration rights with respect to their shares of common stock, including shares of common stock issuable upon conversion thereof and shares of common stock issued as a dividend or other distribution with respect to or in exchange for or in replacement of the foregoing shares, as described below.

Demand Registration Rights
If at any time beginning 180 days after this offering, the holders of at least 10% of the registrable securities (under the Investors’ Rights Agreement) request in writing that we effect a registration with respect to their shares in an offering with an anticipated aggregate offering price of at least $10.0 million, we may be required to register their shares. We are obligated to effect at most two registrations for the holders of registrable securities in response to these demand registration rights. If the holders requesting registration intend to distribute their shares by means of an underwriting, the managing underwriter of such offering will have the right to limit the numbers of shares to be underwritten for reasons related to the marketing of the shares.
Piggyback Registration Rights
If we propose to register any shares of our common stock under the Securities Act,for public sale, subject to certain exceptions, the holders of registrable securities will be entitled to notice of the registration and to include their shares of registrable securities in the registration. If such demand is made by the holders of registrable securities, we must use commercially reasonable efforts to include such holders’ shares in the registration. If our proposed registration involves an underwriting, the managing underwriter of such offering will have the right to limit the number of shares to be underwritten for reasons related to the marketing of the shares. The piggy-back registration rights have been waived for purposes of this offering.
Form S-3 Registration Rights
If at any time beginning 180 days after this offering, we become entitled under the Securities Act to register our shares on Form S-3 a holderHolders of registrable securities requestscan request in writing that we register their shares for public resale on Form S-3 in an offering with an anticipated aggregate offering price of at least $2.0 million, and we will beare required to use commercially reasonable efforts to effect such registration; provided, however, that we will not be required to effect such a registration if, within the preceding 12 months, we have already effected two registrations on Form S-3 for the holders of registrable securities.
Expenses
All expenses incurred in connection with the registration will be borne by us, except for if a demand registration is withdrawn under certain conditions. These expenses may include all registration and filing fees, printing expenses, fees and disbursements of our counsel, reasonable fees and disbursements of a counsel for the selling securityholders, blue sky fees and expenses and the expenses of any regular and special audits incident to the registration.
Termination of Registration Rights
The registration rights terminate upon the earlier of  five years after the effective date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part,(i) February 20, 2019, or (ii) with respect to the registration rights of an individual holder, when the holder can sell all of such holder’s registrable securities in compliance with Rule 144 of the Securities Act within a ninety day period.
70

Anti-Takeover ProvisionsEffects of Delaware Law and Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
Some provisions of Delaware law, our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws contain provisions that could make the following transactions more difficult: an acquisition of us by means of a tender offer; an acquisition of us by means of a proxy contest or otherwise; or the removal of our incumbent officers and directors. It is possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish or could deter transactions that stockholders may otherwise consider to be in their best interest or in our best interests, including transactions which provide for payment of a premium over the market price for our shares.
These provisions, summarized below, are intended to discourage coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids. These provisions are also designed to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to first negotiate with our board of directors. We believe that the benefits of the increased protection of our potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure us outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging these proposals because negotiation of these proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.
Delaware LawAnti-Takeover Statute
We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. This provisionUnder Section 203, we would generally prohibits a Delaware corporationbe prohibited from engaging in any business combination with any interested stockholder for a period of three years following the date thetime that this stockholder became an interested stockholder unless:

  • prior to such date,this time, the board of directors of the corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder;

  • upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced, excluding for purposes of determining the

number of shares outstanding those shares owned by persons who are directors and also officers, and by employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or

  • onat or subsequent to such date,time, the business combination is approved by the Boardboard of Directors directors and authorized at an annual meeting or special meeting of stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the interested stockholder.
Under Section 203, defines a business combination to include:“business combination” includes:

  • any merger or consolidation involving the corporation and the interested stockholder;

  • any sale, transfer, pledge or other disposition of 10% or more of the assets of the corporation involving the interested stockholder;

  • subject to certain exceptions, any transaction that results in the issuance or transfer by the corporation of any stock of the corporation to the interested stockholder;
stockholder, subject to limited exceptions;

  • any transaction involving the corporation that has the effect of increasing the proportionate share of the stock of any class or series of the corporation beneficially owned by the interested stockholder; or

  • the receipt by the interested stockholder of the benefit of any loans, advances, guarantees, pledges or other financial benefits provided by or through the corporation.
In general, Section 203 defines an “interested stockholder”interested stockholder as anyan entity or person beneficially owning 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of a corporation, or an affiliate or associate of the corporation and was the owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of a corporation at any time within three years prior to the time of determination of interested stockholder status; and any entity or person affiliated with or controlling or controlled by such entity or person.
These statutory provisions could delay or frustrate the removal of incumbent directors or a change in control of our company. They could also discourage, impede, or prevent a merger, tender offer, or proxy contest, even if such event would be favorable to the interests of stockholders.
71

Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaw ProvisionsBylaws
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could have the effect of discouraging potential acquisition proposals or making a tender offer or delaying or preventing a change in control, including changes a stockholder might consider favorable. In particular, the certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as applicable, among other things:

  • provide our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors with the ability to alter its bylaws without stockholder approval; and

  • provide that vacancies on our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors may be filled by a majority of Directorsdirectors in office, although less than a quorum.
Such provisions may have the effect of discouraging a third-party from acquiring our company, even if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These provisions are intended to enhance the likelihood of continuity and stability in the composition of our Boardboard of Directorsdirectors and in the policies formulated by them, and to discourage some types of transactions that may involve an actual or threatened change in control of our company. These provisions are designed to reduce our vulnerability to an unsolicited acquisition proposal and to discourage some tactics that may be used in proxy fights. We believe that the benefits of increased protection of our potential ability to negotiate with the proponent of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure our company outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging such proposals because, among other things, negotiation of such proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.
terms
Amendment of Charter Provisions
71

However, theseThe provisions of Delaware law, our certificate of incorporation and our bylaws could have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers forattempting hostile takeovers and, as a consequence, they may also inhibit temporary fluctuations in the market price of our sharescommon stock that couldoften result from actual or rumored hostile takeover attempts. These provisions may also may have the effect of preventing changes in the composition of our board and management. It is possible that these provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish transactions that stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their best interests.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Corporate Stock Transfer, Inc., whose address is 3200 Cherry Creek Drive South, #430, Denver, Colorado 80209, and whose telephone number is (303) 282-4800.
Listing
We have applied to list ourOur common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “SMLR.”

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
UnderwritingWe are offering up to             shares of our common stock. We have engaged H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC as our placement agent for this offering. Wainwright is not purchasing or selling any shares, nor are they required to arrange for the purchase and sale of any specific number or dollar amount of shares, other than to use their reasonable “best efforts” to arrange for the sale of shares by us. Therefore, we may not sell the entire amount of shares being offered.
Aegis Capital Corp. is acting asWe will enter into securities purchase agreements directly with certain institutional investors which purchase not less than $         of securities in this offering. We will not enter into any securities purchase agreement with investors that purchase less than $         of securities in this offering and such investors which purchase less than $         shall rely solely on this prospectus in connection with the representativepurchase of securities in this offering. Wainwright may retain one or more sub-agents or selected dealers in connection with the offering.
Upon the closing of this offering, we will pay the placement agent a cash transaction fee equal to 7% of the underwritersgross proceeds to us from the sale of the offering. We have entered into an underwriting agreement dated          , 2014 withshares.
The following table shows the representative. Subjectper share and total fees we will pay to the terms and conditionsplacement agent assuming the sale of all of the underwriting agreement,shares offered pursuant to this prospectus.
Per share$
Total$
In addition, we have agreed to sellgrant compensation warrants to each underwriter named below and each underwriter named below has severally and not jointly agreedthe placement agent (or its designees) to purchase from us, ata number of shares of our common stock equal to 7% of the public offering price per share less the underwriting discounts set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, theaggregate number of shares of common stock listed next to its namesold by us in the following table:
Underwriter
Number of
Shares
Aegis Capital Corp.
Total
1,180,000
offering. The underwriters are committedcompensation warrants will have an exercise price equal to purchase all the shares of common stock offered by us other than those covered by the option to purchase additional shares described below, if they purchase any shares. The obligations$          (125% of the underwriters may be terminated upon the occurrence of certain events specified in the underwriting agreement. Furthermore, pursuant to the underwriting agreement, the underwriters’ obligations are subject to customary conditions, representations and warranties contained in the underwriting agreement, such as receipt by the underwriters of officers’ certificates and legal opinions.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Director, Dr. Murphy-Chutorian, has indicated an interest in purchasing up to 35,400 sharesclosing bid price of our common stock in this offering at the initial public offering price. The underwriters will receive the same underwriting discount on any shares purchased by Dr. Murphy- Chutorian, or any other existing stockholder, as they will on any other shares sold to the public in this offering.
We have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against specified liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, and to contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to make in respect thereof.
The underwriters are offering the shares, subject to prior sale, when, as and if issued to and accepted by them, subject to approval of legal matters by their counsel and other conditions specified in the underwriting agreement. The underwriters reserve the right to withdraw, cancel or modify offers to the public and to reject orders in whole or in part.
Over-allotment Option.   We have granted the underwriters an over-allotment option. This option, which is exercisable for up to 45 days after the date of this prospectus, permits the underwriters to purchase a maximum of 177,000 additional shares (15%pricing of the shares sold in this offering) from us to cover over-allotments, if any. If the underwriters exercise all or partand a term of this option, they will purchase shares covered by the option at the public offering price per share that appears on the cover page of this prospectus, less the underwriting discount. If this option is exercised in full, the total offering price to the public will be $          and the total net proceeds, before expenses, to us will be $         .
Discount.   The following table shows the public offering price, underwriting discount and proceeds, before expenses, to us. The information assumes either no exercise or full exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option.
Per
Share
Total Without
Over-Allotment
Option
Total With
Over-Allotment
Option
Public offering price
$$$
Underwriting discount (7%)
$$$
Non-accountable expense allowance (1%)(1)
$$$
Proceeds, before expense, to us
$$$
(1)
  • Non-accountable expense allowance shall not be payable with respect to any shares sold pursuant to the representative’s exercise of five years, provided that the over-allotment option.

The underwriters propose to offer the shares offered by us to the public at the public offering price per share set forth on the cover of this prospectus. In addition, the underwriters may offer some of the shares to other securities dealers at such price less a concession of $          per share. If all of the shares offered by us are not sold at the public offering price per share, the underwriters may change the offering price per share and other selling terms by means of a supplement to this prospectus.
We have paid an aggregate expense deposit of $35,000 to the representative for out-of-pocket-accountable expenses, whichcompensation warrants will be applied against accountable expenses that will be paid by us to the underwriters in connection with this offering in accordancecomply with FINRA Rule 5110(f)(2)(C). The underwriting agreement, however, provides5110(g)(1) in that in the event the offering is terminated, the $35,000 expense deposit paid to the representative will be returned to the extent such out-of-pocket accountable expenses are not actually incurred in accordance with FINRA Rule 5110(f)(2)(C).
We have also agreed to pay the underwriters’ expenses relating to the offering, including (a) all fees, expenses and disbursements relating to background checks of our officers and Directors in an amount not to exceed $2,500 per individual, but no more than $15,000 in the aggregate; (b) all filing fees incurred in clearing this offering with FINRA; (c) payment of up to $15,000 for “blue-sky” counsel; (d) all fees, expenses and disbursements relating to the registration, qualification or exemption of securities offered under the securities laws of foreign jurisdictions designated by the underwriters; (e) the cost of commemorative mementos and lucite tombstones up to $5,000; (f) the fees and expenses of underwriter’s legal counsel, not to exceed $50,000; (g) upon successfully completing this offering, $21,775 for the underwriters’ use of Ipreo’s book-building, prospectus tracking and compliance software for this offering; and (h) upon successfully completing this offering, up to $20,000 of the representative’s actual accountable road show expenses for the offering.
We estimate that the total expenses of the offering payable by us, excluding the total underwriting discount, will be approximately $         .
Discretionary Accounts.   The underwriters do not intend to confirm sales of the securities offered hereby to any accounts over which they have discretionary authority.
Lock-Up Agreements.   We, our Directors and executive officers and all our other stockholders expect to enter into lock up agreements with the representative prior to the commencement of this offering pursuant to which each of these persons or entities, for a period of six months fromafter the effectiveissuance date of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part without the prior written consent of the representative, agreecompensation warrants (which shall not to (1) offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, lend, or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of our securities or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of our common stock owned or acquired on or prior tobe earlier than the closing date of this offering (including any shares of common stock acquired after the closing date of this offering upon the conversion, exercise or exchange of such securities); (2) file or caused to be filed any registration statement relating to the offering ofpursuant to which the compensation warrants are being issued), neither the compensation warrants nor any warrant shares of our capital stock; or (3) enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to another, in whole or in part, anyissued upon exercise of the economic consequencescompensation warrants shall be (A) sold, transferred, assigned, pledged, or hypothecated, or (B) the subject of ownership of the common stock, whether any such transaction described in clause (1), (2) or (3) above is to be settled by delivery of common stock or such other securities, in cash or otherwise, except for certain exceptions and limitations.
The lock-up period described in the preceding paragraphs will be automatically extended if: (1) during the last 17 days of the restricted period, we issue an earnings release or announce material news or a material event; or (2) prior to the expiration of the lock-up period, we announce that we will release earnings results during the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the lock-up period, in which case the restrictions described in the preceding paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the date of the earnings release.
Representative’s Warrants.   We have agreed to issue to the representative warrants to purchase up to a total of 57,500 shares of common stock (5% of the shares of common stock sold in this offering, excluding the over-allotment). The warrants will be exercisable at any time, and from time to time, in whole or in part, during the four-year period commencing one year from the effective date of the offering, which period shall

not extend further than five years from the effective date of the offering in compliance with FINRA Rule 5110(f)(2)(H)(i). The warrants are exercisable at a per share price equal to 125% of the public offering price per share in the offering. The warrants have been deemed compensation by FINRA and are therefore subject to a 180 day lock-up pursuant to Rule 5110(g)(1) of FINRA. The representative (or permitted assignees under Rule 5110(g)(1)) will not sell, transfer, assign, pledge, or hypothecate these warrants or the securities underlying these warrants, nor will they engage in any hedging, short sale, derivative, put, or call transaction that would result in the effective economic disposition of the warrants or the underlying securities by any person for a period of 180 days fromimmediately following the effective date of the offering. In addition, the warrants provide for registration rights upon request, in certain cases. In addition, the warrants provide for registration rights upon request, in certain cases. The demand registration right provided will not be greater than five years from the effective dateeffectiveness or commencement of sales of the offering in compliance withpursuant to which the compensation warrants are being issued, except the transfer of any security as permitted by the FINRA rules and provided, that pursuant to FINRA Rule 5110(f)(2)(H)(iv). The piggyback registration right provided will not be greater than seven years from5110(g), neither the effective date of the offering in compliance with FINRA Rule 5110(f)(2)(H)(v). We will bear all fees and expenses attendant to registering the securities issuable on exercise of the warrants other than underwriting commissions incurred and payable by the holders. The exercise price and number ofplacement agent Warrants nor any shares issuableissued upon exercise of the warrants mayplacement agent Warrants shall be adjusted in certain circumstances includingsold, transferred, assigned, pledged, or hypothecated, or be the subject of any hedging, short sale, derivative, put, or call transaction that would result in the event of a stock dividend, extraordinary cash dividend or our recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation. However, the warrant exercise price or underlying shares will not be adjusted for issuances of shares of common stock at a price below the warrant exercise price.
Right of First Refusal.   Subject to certain limited exceptions, until twelve months from the consummationeffective economic disposition of the securities by any person for a period of 180 days immediately following the date of effectiveness or commencement of sales of this offering, except the Representative hastransfer of any security:

by operation of law or by reason of reorganization of our company;

to any FINRA member firm participating in the offering and the officers or partners thereof, if all securities so transferred remain subject to the lock-up restriction set forth above for the remainder of the time period;

if the aggregate amount of securities of our company held by the holder of the placement agent Warrants or related person do not exceed 1% of the securities being offered;

that is beneficially owned on a pro-rata basis by all equity owners of an investment fund, provided that no participating member manages or otherwise directs investments by the fund, and participating members in the aggregate do not own more than 10% of the equity in the fund; or

the exercise or conversion of any security, if all securities received remain subject to the lock-up restriction set forth above for the remainder of the time period.
73

Upon closing of this offering, we will also pay Wainwright a non-accountable expense allowance for its expenses incurred in connection with this offering in an amount equal to the greater of 1% of the aggregate gross proceeds raised in the offering or $100,000. Upon completion of this offering, we have granted Wainwright a right of first refusal to purchase for its accountact as exclusive lead underwriter or to sell for our account, orexclusive lead placement agent in connection with any subsidiary or successor, any securities of our company or any such subsidiary or successor that we or any subsidiary or successor may seek to sell insubsequent public or private offering of equity and public debt offerings during such twelve-month period. The Representative will not have more than one opportunity to waivesecurities or terminate theother capital markets financing by us. This right of first refusal in considerationextends for nine months from the closing date of this offering. The terms of any payment or fee.such engagement will be determined by separate agreement.
Electronic Offer, Sale and Distribution of Securities.   A prospectus in electronic formatThe placement agent may be made availabledeemed to be an underwriter within the meaning of Section 2(a)(11) of the Securities Act and any commissions received by it and any profit realized on the websites maintained by one or moresale of the underwriterssecurities by it while acting as principal might be deemed to be underwriting discounts or selling group members, if any, participating in this offering and one or morecommissions under the Securities Act. The placement agent will be required to comply with the requirements of the underwriters participating in this offering may distribute prospectuses electronically. The representative may agree to allocate a numberSecurities Act and the Securities Exchange Act of shares and warrants to underwriters and selling group members for sale to their online brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be allocated by the underwriters and selling group members that will make internet distributions on the same basis1934, as other allocations. Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information on these websites is not part of, nor incorporated by reference into, this prospectusamended, or the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part, has not been approved or endorsed by us or any underwriter in its capacity as underwriter,Exchange Act, including, without limitation, Rule 10b-5 and should not be relied upon by investors.
Stabilization.   In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions, syndicate-covering transactions, penalty bids and purchases to cover positions created by short sales.
  • Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase shares so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum, and are engaged in for the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of the shares while the offering is in progress.
  • Over-allotment transactions involve sales by the underwriters of shares in excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated to purchase. This creates a syndicate short position that may be either a covered short position or a naked short position. In a covered short position, the number of shares over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the number of shares that they may purchase in the over-allotment option. In a naked short position, the number of shares involved is greater than the number of shares in the over-allotment option. The underwriters may close out any short position by exercising their over-allotment option and/or purchasing shares in the open market.
  • Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of shares in the open market after the distribution has been completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In determining the source of shares to close out the short position, the underwriters will consider, among other

things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as compared with the price at which they may purchase shares through exercise of the over-allotment option. If the underwriters sell more shares than could be covered by exercise of the over-allotment option and, therefore, have a naked short position, the position can be closed out only by buying shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that after pricing there could be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open market that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering.
  • Penalty bids permit the representative to reclaim a selling concession from a syndicate member when the shares originally sold by that syndicate member are purchased in stabilizing or syndicate covering transactions to cover syndicate short positions.
These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining the market price of our shares or common stock or preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of our shares or common stock. As a result, the price of our common stock in the open market may be higher than it would otherwise be in the absence of these transactions. Neither we nor the underwriters make any representation or prediction as to the effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of our common stock. These transactions may be effected on The NASDAQ Capital Market, in the over-the-counter market or otherwise and, if commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
Passive market making.   In connection with this offering, underwriters and selling group members may engage in passive market making transactions in our common stock on The NASDAQ Capital Market or on the OTC QB in accordance with Rule 103 of Regulation M under the Exchange Act, during a period beforeAct. These rules and regulations may limit the commencementtiming of offers orpurchases and sales of shares of common stock by the sharesplacement agent. Under these rules and extending throughregulations, the completion of the distribution. A passive market maker must display its bid at a priceplacement agent may not in excess of the highest independent bid of that security. However, if all independent bids are lowered below the passive market maker’s bid, then that bid must then be lowered when specified purchase limits are exceeded.
Offer Restrictions Outside the United States
Other than in the United States, no action has been taken by us or the underwriters that would permit a public offering of the securities offered by this prospectus(i) engage in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. The securities offered by this prospectus may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, nor may this prospectus or any other offering material or advertisementsstabilization activity in connection with the offerour securities; and sale(ii) bid for or purchase any of our securities or attempt to induce any suchperson to purchase any of our securities, be distributed or published in any jurisdiction, except under circumstances that will result in compliance with the applicable rules and regulations of that jurisdiction. Persons into whose possession this prospectus comes are advised to inform themselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to the offering and the distribution of this prospectus. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities offered by this prospectus in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or a solicitation is unlawful.
Australia
This prospectus is not a disclosure document under Chapter 6D of the Australian Corporations Act, has not been lodged with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission and does not purport to include the information required of a disclosure document under Chapter 6D of the Australian Corporations Act. Accordingly, (i) the offer of the securities under this prospectus is only made to persons to whom it is lawful to offer the securities without disclosure under Chapter 6D of the Australian Corporations Act under one or more exemptions set out in section 708 of the Australian Corporations Act, (ii) this prospectus is made available in Australia only to those personsother than as set forth in clause (i) above, and (iii) the offeree must be sent a notice stating in substance that by accepting this offer, the offeree represents that the offeree is such a person as set forth in clause (i) above, and, unless permitted under the Australian CorporationsExchange Act, agrees not to sell or offer for sale within Australia any of the securities sold to the offeree within 12 months after its transfer for the offeree under this prospectus.
China
The information in this document does not constitute a public offer of the securities, whether by way of sale or subscription,until they have completed their participation in the People’s Republic of China (excluding,distribution.
We will indemnify the placement agent against specified liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act and to contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to make for purposes of this paragraph, Hong
these liabilities.

Kong Special Administrative Region, Macau Special Administrative Region and Taiwan). The securities may not be offered or sold directly or indirectly in the PRC to legal or natural persons other than directly to “qualified domestic institutional investors.”
European Economic Area — Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and Netherlands
The information in this document has been prepared on the basis that all offers of common stock will be made pursuant to an exemption under the Directive 2003/71/EC (“Prospectus Directive”), as implemented in Member States of the European Economic Area (each, a “Relevant Member State”), from the requirement to produce a prospectus for offers of securities.
An offer to the public of common stock has not been made, and may not be made, in a Relevant Member State except pursuant to one of the following exemptions under the Prospectus Directive as implemented in that Relevant Member State:
  • to legal entities that are authorized or regulated to operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;
  • to any legal entity that has two or more of (i) an average of at least 250 employees during its last fiscal year; (ii) a total balance sheet of more than €43,000,000 (as shown on its last annual unconsolidated or consolidated financial statements) and (iii) an annual net turnover of more than €50,000,000 (as shown on its last annual unconsolidated or consolidated financial statement);
  • to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than qualified investors within the meaning of Article 2(1)I of the Prospectus Directive) subject to obtaining the prior consent of the company or any underwriter for any such offer; or
  • in any other circumstances falling within Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive, provided that no such offer of common stock shall result in a requirement for the publication by the company of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.
France
This document is not being distributed in the context of a public offering of financial securities (offre au public de titres financiers) in France within the meaning of Article L.411-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code (Code monétaire et financier) and Articles 211-1 et seq. of the General Regulation of the French Autorité des marchés financiers (“AMF”). The common stock has not been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, to the public in France.
This document and any other offering material relating to the common stock has not been, and will not be, submitted to the AMF for approval in France and, accordingly, may not be distributed or caused to distributed, directly or indirectly, to the public in France.
Such offers, sales and distributions have been and shall only be made in France to (i) qualified investors (investisseurs qualifiés) acting for their own account, as defined in and in accordance with Articles L.411-2-II-2° and D.411-1 to D.411-3, D. 744-1, D.754-1 and D.764-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code and any implementing regulation and/or (ii) a restricted number of non-qualified investors (cercle restreint d’investisseurs non-qualifiés) acting for their own account, as defined in and in accordance with Articles L.411-2-II-2° and D.411-4, D.744-1, D.754-1 and D.764-1 of the French Monetary and Financial Code and any implementing regulation.
Pursuant to Article 211-3 of the General Regulation of the AMF, investors in France are informed that the common stock cannot be distributed (directly or indirectly) to the public by the investors otherwise than in accordance with Articles L.411-1, L.411-2, L.412-1 and L.621-8 to L.621-8-3 of the French Monetary and Financial Code.
Ireland
The information in this document does not constitute a prospectus under any Irish laws or regulations and this document has not been filed with or approved by any Irish regulatory authority as the information has not been prepared in the context of a public offering of securities in Ireland within the meaning of the

LEGAL MATTERS
Irish Prospectus (Directive 2003/71/EC) Regulations 2005 (the “Prospectus Regulations”). The common stock has not been offered or sold, andReed Smith LLP, New York, New York will not be offered, sold or delivered directly or indirectly in Ireland by way of a public offering, except to (i) qualified investors as defined in Regulation 2(l) of the Prospectus Regulations and (ii) fewer than 100 natural or legal persons who are not qualified investors.
Israel
The common stock offered by this prospectus have not been approved or disapproved by the Israeli Securities Authority (the ISA), or ISA, nor have such common stock been registered for sale in Israel. The shares and warrants may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, to the public in Israel, absent the publication of a prospectus. The ISA has not issued permits, approvals or licenses in connection with the offering or publishing the prospectus; nor has it authenticated the details included herein, confirmed their reliability or completeness, or rendered an opinion as to the quality of the common stock being offered. Any resale in Israel, directly or indirectly, to the public of the common stock offered by this prospectus is subject to restrictions on transferability and must be effected only in compliance with the Israeli securities laws and regulations.
Italy
The offering of the common stock in the Republic of Italy has not been authorized by the Italian Securities and Exchange Commission (Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa, “CONSOBpursuant to the Italian securities legislation and, accordingly, no offering material relating to the common stock may be distributed in Italy and such securities may not be offered or sold in Italy in a public offer within the meaning of Article 1.1(t) of Legislative Decree No. 58 of 24 February 1998 (“Decree No. 58”), other than:
  • to Italian qualified investors, as defined in Article 100 of Decree no. 58 by reference to Article 34-ter of CONSOB Regulation no. 11971 of 14 May 1999 (“Regulation no. 1197l”) as amended (“Qualified Investors”); and
  • in other circumstances that are exempt from the rules on public offer pursuant to Article 100 of Decree No. 58 and Article 34-ter of Regulation No. 11971 as amended.
Any offer, sale or delivery of the common stock or distribution of any offer document relating to the common stock in Italy (excluding placements where a Qualified Investor solicits an offer from the issuer) under the paragraphs above must be:
  • made by investment firms, banks or financial intermediaries permitted to conduct such activities in Italy in accordance with Legislative Decree No. 385 of 1 September 1993 (as amended), Decree No. 58, CONSOB Regulation No. 16190 of 29 October 2007 and any other applicable laws; and
  • in compliance with all relevant Italian securities, tax and exchange controls and any other applicable laws.
Any subsequent distribution of the common stock in Italy must be made in compliance with the public offer and prospectus requirement rules provided under Decree No. 58 and the Regulation No. 11971 as amended, unless an exception from those rules applies. Failure to comply with such rules may result in the sale of such common stock being declared null and void and in the liability of the entity transferring the common stock for any damages suffered by the investors.
Japan
The common stock has not been and will not be registered under Article 4, paragraph 1 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan (Law No. 25 of 1948), as amended (the “FIEL”) pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements applicable to a private placement of securities to Qualified Institutional Investors (as defined in and in accordance with Article 2, paragraph 3 of the FIEL and the regulations promulgated thereunder). Accordingly, the common stock may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, in Japan or to, or for the benefit of, any resident of Japan other than Qualified

Institutional Investors. Any Qualified Institutional Investor who acquires common stock may not resell them to any person in Japan that is not a Qualified Institutional Investor, and acquisition by any such person of common stock is conditionalpass upon the execution of an agreement to that effect.
Portugal
This document is not being distributed in the context of a public offer of financial securities (oferta púbica de valores mobiliários) in Portugal, within the meaning of Article 109 of the Portuguese Securities Code (Código dos Valores Mobiliários). The common stock has not been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, to the public in Portugal. This document and any other offering material relating to the common stock has not been, and will not be, submitted to the Portuguese Securities Market Commission (Comissão do Mercado de Valores Mobiliários) for approval in Portugal and, accordingly, may not be distributed or caused to distributed, directly or indirectly, to the public in Portugal, other than under circumstances that are deemed not to qualify as a public offer under the Portuguese Securities Code. Such offers, sales and distributions of common stock in Portugal are limited to persons who are “qualified investors” (as defined in the Portuguese Securities Code). Only such investors may receive this document and they may not distribute it or the information contained in it to any other person.
Sweden
This document has not been, and will not be, registered with or approved by Finansinspektionen (the Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority). Accordingly, this document may not be made available, nor may the common stock be offered for sale in Sweden, other than under circumstances that are deemed not to require a prospectus under the Swedish Financial Instruments Trading Act (1991:980) (Sw. lag (1991:980) om handel med finansiella instrument). Any offering of common stock in Sweden is limited to persons who are “qualified investors” (as defined in the Financial Instruments Trading Act). Only such investors may receive this document and they may not distribute it or the information contained in it to any other person.
Switzerland
The common stock may not be publicly offered in Switzerland and will not be listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange (“SIX”) or on any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. This document has been prepared without regard to the disclosure standards for issuance prospectuses under art. 652a or art. 1156 of the Swiss Code of Obligations or the disclosure standards for listing prospectuses under art. 27 ff. of the SIX Listing Rules or the listing rules of any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. Neither this document nor any other offering material relating to the common stock may be publicly distributed or otherwise made publicly available in Switzerland.
Neither this document nor any other offering material relating to the common stock has been or will be filed with or approved by any Swiss regulatory authority. In particular, this document will not be filed with, and the offer of common stock will not be supervised by, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA).
This document is personal to the recipient only and not for general circulation in Switzerland.
United Arab Emirates
Neither this document nor the common stock have been approved, disapproved or passed on in any way by the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates or any other governmental authority in the United Arab Emirates, nor have we received authorization or licensing from the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates or any other governmental authority in the United Arab Emirates to market or sell the common stock within the United Arab Emirates. This document does not constitute and may not be used for the purpose of an offer or invitation. No services relating to the common stock, including the receipt of applications and/or the allotment or redemption of such shares, may be rendered within the United Arab Emirates by us.
No offer or invitation to subscribe for common stock is valid or permitted in the Dubai International Financial Centre.

United Kingdom
Neither the information in this document nor any other document relating to the offer has been delivered for approval to the Financial Services Authority in the United Kingdom and no prospectus (within the meaning of section 85 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, as amended (“FSMA”)) has been published or is intended to be published in respect of the common stock. This document is issued on a confidential basis to “qualified investors” (within the meaning of section 86(7) of FSMA) in the United Kingdom, and the common stock may not be offered or sold in the United Kingdom by means of this document, any accompanying letter or any other document, except in circumstances that do not require the publication of a prospectus pursuant to section 86(1) FSMA. This document should not be distributed, published or reproduced, in whole or in part, nor may its contents be disclosed by recipients to any other person in the United Kingdom.
Any invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity (within the meaning of section 21 of FSMA) received in connection with the issue or sale of the common stock has only been communicated or caused to be communicated and will only be communicated or caused to be communicated in the United Kingdom in circumstances in which section 21(1) of FSMA does not apply to us.
In the United Kingdom, this document is being distributed only to, and is directed at, persons (i) who have professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within Article 19(5) (investment professionals) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotions) Order 2005 (“FPO”), (ii) who fall within the categories of persons referred to in Article 49(2)(a) to (d) (high net worth companies, unincorporated associations, etc.) of the FPO or (iii) to whom it may otherwise be lawfully communicated (together “relevant persons”). The investments to which this document relates are available only to, and any invitation, offer or agreement to purchase will be engaged in only with, relevant persons. Any person who is not a relevant person should not act or rely on this document or any of its contents.

Legal Matters
The validity of the securities being offered by this prospectus has been passed upon for us by Reed Smith LLP, New York, New York.prospectus. Certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be passed upon for the underwritersWainright by Blank RomeEllenoff, Grossman & Schole LLP, New York, New York.
ExpertsEXPERTS
The financial statements as of December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 20132014 included in this prospectus and in the registration statement have been so included in reliance on the report of BDO USA, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm (the report on the financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern), appearing elsewhere herein and in the registration statement, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
Where You Can Find Additional InformationWHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of common stocksecurities we are offering to sell. This prospectus, which constitutes part of the registration statement, does not include all of the information contained in the registration statement and the exhibits, schedules and amendments to the registration statement. For further information with respect to us and our common stock, we refer you to the registration statement and to the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. Statements contained in this prospectus about the contents of any contract, agreement or other document are not necessarily complete, and, in each instance, we refer you to the copy of the contract, agreement or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. Each of these statements is qualified in all respects by this reference.
You may read and copy the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part at the SEC’s public reference room, which is located at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. You can request copies of the registration statement by writing to the Securities and Exchange Commission and paying a fee for the copying cost. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for more information about the operation of the SEC’s public reference room. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet website, which is located at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. You may access the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part at the SEC’s Internet website. Upon completion of this offering, we will be
We are subject to the information and periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, and we will file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC.
These periodic reports, proxy statements and other information are available for inspection and copying at the public reference room and website of the SEC referred to above. We maintain a website at http://semlerscientific.com. You may access our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act with the SEC free of charge at our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The information contained in, or that can be accessed through, our website is not incorporated by reference in, and is not part of, this prospectus.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Semler Scientific, Inc.
Portland, Oregon
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Semler Scientific, Inc. as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013 and the related statements of operations, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ deficit,equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2013. then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the CompanySemler Scientific, Inc. as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the periodthen ended, December 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has a deficit in working capital and stockholders’ equity and has suffered recurring losses from operations and will continue to incurexpects continuing future losses in the future that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ BDO USA, LLP
New York, New York

February 17, 2014
BDO USA, LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership, is the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms.
BDO is the brand name for the BDO network and for each of the BDO Member Firms.13, 2015

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Balance Sheets
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
As of December 31,
20142013
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash$4,156$734
Restricted cash2,100
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of  $51 and $15 respectively355228
Prepaid expenses and other current assets13547
Total current assets6,7461,009
Assets for lease, net673512
Property and equipment, net91
Long-term deposits17
Deferred financing costs55202
Total assets$7,500$1,724
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$89$255
Accrued expenses1,3631,128
Deferred revenue612366
Equipment lease, current portion47
Loans payable, current portion2,00060
Total current liabilities4,0641,856
Long-term liabilities:
Equipment lease, net of current portion65
Loans payable, net of current portion98
Total long-term liabilities163
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Redeemable convertible preferred stock series A, $0.001 par value; 2,800,000 shares
authorized; 0, and 1,468,402 shares issued and outstanding, respectively; aggregate
liquidation preference of  $0, and $6,608, respectively
6,020
Redeemable convertible preferred stock series A-1, $0.001 par value; 800,000 shares authorized; 0, and 293,750 shares issued and outstanding, respectively; aggregate liquidation preference of  $0 and $1,175, respectively482
Redeemable convertible preferred stock series A-2, $0.001 par value; 400,000 shares authorized; 0, and 250,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively; aggregate liquidation preference of  $0 and $500, respectively208
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 4,741,017, and 811,750 shares issued, and 4,716,017 and 786,750 shares outstanding (treasury shares of 25,000, and 25,000, respectively)51
Additional paid-in capital17,2982,346
Accumulated deficit(13,867)(9,352)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)3,436(295)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)$7,500$1,724
   December 31,
2013
  
Proforma
December 31,
2013 Stockholders’
Deficit
  December 31,
2012
 
 
Assets
                  
 
Current Assets:
                  
 
Cash
  $734      $731      
 
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $15 and $0, respectively
   228       75      
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
   47       21      
 
Total current assets
   1,009       827      
 
Assets for lease, net
   512       359      
 
Property and equipment, net
   1             
 
Deferred financing costs
   202       290      
 
Total assets
  $1,724      $1,476      
 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
                 
 
Current liabilities:
                 
 
Accounts payable
  $255      $86      
 
Accrued expenses
   1,128       895      
 
Warrant liability
          31      
 
Deferred revenue
   366       64      
 
Equipment on lease, current portion
   47       43      
 
Loans payable, current portion
   60       60      
 
Total current liabilities
   1,856       1,179      
 
Long-term liabilities:
                 
 
Equipment on lease, net of current portion
   65       112      
 
Loans payable, net of current portion
   98       158      
 
Total long-term liabilities
   163       270      
 
Commitments and contingencies:
                 
 
Redeemable convertible preferred stock series A, $0.001 par value; 2,800,000 shares authorized; 0, 0 (proforma unaudited), and 936,292 shares issued and outstanding, respectively; aggregate liquidation preference of $0, $0, and $4,213, respectively
          3,602      
 
Stockholders’ deficit:
                  
 
Convertible preferred stock series A, $0.001 par value; 2,800,000 shares authorized; 1,468,402, 0 (proforma unaudited), and 0 shares issued and outstanding, respectively; aggregate liquidation preference of $6,608, $0, and $0, respectively
   6,020             
 
Convertible preferred stock series A-1, $0.001 par value; 800,000 shares authorized; 293,750, 0 (proforma unaudited), and 293,750 shares issued and outstanding, respectively; aggregate liquidation preference of $1,175, $0 and $1,175, respectively
   482       482      
 
Convertible preferred stock series A-2, $0.001 par value; 400,000 shares authorized; 250,000, 0 (proforma unaudited), and 250,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively; aggregate liquidation preference of $500, $0 and $500, respectively
   208       208      
 
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 and 10,000,000 shares authorized; 811,750, 2,823,902 (proforma unaudited), and 811,750 shares issued, and 786,750, 2,798,902 (proforma unaudited), and 786,750 outstanding (net of treasury shares of 25,000, 25,000 (proforma unaudited) and 25,000), respectively
   1   3   1      
 
Additional paid-in capital
   2,346   9,054   2,853      
 
Accumulated deficit
   (9,352)   (9,352)   (7,119)      
 
Total stockholders’ deficit
   (295)   (295)   (3,575)      
 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
  $1,724      $1,476      

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Statements of Operations
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
For the year ended December 31,
20142013
Revenue$3,635$2,274
Operating expenses:
Cost of revenue692469
Engineering and product development1,113356
Sales and marketing3,7232,256
General and administrative2,4481,317
Total operating expenses7,9764,398
Loss from operations(4,341)(2,124)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(175)(108)
Other income (expense)1(1)
Other expense(174)(109)
Net loss$(4,515)$(2,233)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted$(1.10)$(2.84)
Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic and diluted
loss per share
4,105,754786,750
   For the years ended December 31, 
   2013  2012 
 
Revenue
  $2,274  $1,199      
 
Operating expenses:
              
 
Cost of revenue
   469   364      
 
Engineering and product development
   356   277      
 
Sales and marketing
   2,256   1,718      
 
General and administrative
   1,317   1,255      
 
Total operating expenses
   4,398   3,614      
 
Loss from operations
   (2,124)   (2,415)      
 
Other income (expense):
             
 
Interest expense
   (108)   (120)      
 
Other expense
   (1)   (203)      
 
Other expense
   (109)   (323)      
 
Loss before income tax expense
   (2,233)   (2,738)      
 
Income tax expense
      3      
 
Net loss
  $(2,233)  $(2,741)      
 
Deemed dividend
      (85)      
 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
  $(2,233)  $(2,826)      
 
Net loss per share, basic and diluted
  $(2.84)  $(2.54)      
 
Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic and diluted loss per share
   786,750   1,113,622      

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Statements of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ DeficitEquity (Deficit)
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock (Mezzanine)
Convertible Preferred StockCommon StockTreasury stock
Series ASeries A
Amount
Series ASeries A
Amount
Series A-1Series A-1
Amount
Series A-2Series A-2
Amount
Shares
issued
Common
Stock
Amount
SharesAmountAdditional
Paid-In
Capital
Accumulated
deficit
Total
Stockholders’
Deficit
Balance at January 1, 2013936,292$3,602293,750$482250,000$208811,750$1(25,000)$   —$2,853$(7,119)$(3,575)
Elimination of redeemable right of Series A convertible preferred shares(936,292)(3,602)936,2923,6023,602
Elimination of redeemable right of warrants to buy Series A convertible preferred shares3131
Issuance of convertible preferred shares series A532,1102,4092,409
Offering costs(22)(648)(670)
Stock-based compensation141141
Net loss for 2013(2,233)(2,233
Balance at December 31, 2013$1,468,402$6,020293,750$482250,000$208811,750$1(25,000)$$2,346$(9,352)$(295)
Conversion of all Preferred classes to
common stock in IPO
(1,468,402)(6,020)(293,750)$(482)(250,000)$(208)2,491,26736,707
IPO funding1,430,000110,01010,011
Offering costs(1,959)(1,959)
Stock option exercise8,00044
Stock-based compensation190190
Net loss for 2014(4,515)(4,515)
Balance at December 31, 2014$$$$4,741,017$5(25,000)$$17,298$(13,867)$3,436
   Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock (Mezzanine)
  Convertible Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Treasury stock  Additional
Paid-In
Capital
  Accumulated
deficit
  
Total
Stockholders’
Deficit
 
   Series A  Series A
Amount
  Series A  Series A
Amount
  Series A-1  Series A-1
Amount
  Series A-2  Series A-2
Amount
  
Shares
Issued
  
Common
Stock
Amount
  Shares  
Amount
 
 
Balance at
December 31, 2011
                           1,456,947   1   (25,000)      3,908   (4,378)   (469) 
 
Issuance of common shares
                           27,778            125      125 
 
Conversion of common stock in exchange of convertible preferred stock
   129,225   572         293,750   482   250,000   208   (672,975)            (1,262)      (572) 
 
Conversion of common stock warrants in exchange of preferred stock warrants
                                       (31)      (31) 
 
Issuance of convertible preferred shares series A
   807,067   3,631                                        
 
Warrants issued in exchange for services
      10                                 33      33 
 
Offering costs
      (611)                                 (16)      (16) 
 
Stock-based compensation
                                       96      96 
 
Net loss for 2012
                                          (2,741)   (2,741) 
 
Balance at
December 31, 2012
   936,292  $3,602     $   293,750  $482   250,000  $208   811,750  $1   (25,000)  $  $2,853  $(7,119)  $(3,575) 
 
Elimination of redeemable right of Series A convertible preferred shares
   (936,292)   (3,602)   936,292   3,602                                 3,602 
 
Elimination of redeemable right of warrants to buy Series A convertible preferred shares
            31                                 31 
 
Issuance of convertible preferred shares series A
         532,110   2,409                                 2,409 
 
Offering costs
            (22)                           (648)      (670) 
 
Stock-based compensation
                                       141      141 
 
Net loss for 2013
                                          (2,233)   (2,233) 
 
Balance at
December 31, 2013
     $   1,468,402  $6,020   293,750  $482   250,000  $208   811,750  $1   (25,000)  $  $2,346  $(9,352)  $(295) 

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
For the year ended December 31,
20142013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Loss$(4,515)$(2,233)
Reconciliation of Net Loss to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:
Amortization of deferred financing costs14788
Depreciation196129
Loss on disposal of assets for lease78158
Allowance for doubtful accounts12890
Stock-based compensation expense190141
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable(255)(243)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(106)(26)
Accounts payable(167)169
Accrued expenses236233
Deferred revenue246302
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities(3,822)(1,192)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to property and equipment(9)(1)
Change in restricted cash(2,100)
Purchase of assets for lease(432)(440)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities(2,541)(441)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock10,014
Issuance of convertible preferred stock2,409
Offering costs(1,959)(670)
Proceeds from loans payable2,000
Payments of loans payable(158)(60)
Payments of equipment leases(112)(43)
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities9,7851,636
INCREASE IN CASH3,4223
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD734731
CASH, END OF PERIOD$4,156$734
Cash paid for income taxes$1$3
Cash paid for interest$28$17
Supplemental disclosure of noncash financing activity:
Conversion of preferred stock to common stock$6,707$
Re-class of warrant liability to equity31
   For the years ended December 31, 
   2013  2012 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
         
 
Net Loss
  $(2,233)  $(2,741) 
 
Reconciliation of Net Loss to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:
         
 
Amortization of deferred financing costs
   88   88 
 
Warrants issued in exchange for services
      43 
 
Depreciation
   129   70 
 
Loss on disposal of assets for lease
   158   237 
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
   90    
 
Stock-based compensation expense
   141   96 
 
Provision for non-payment of long-term notes receivable – related party
      191 
 
Loss on write-off of furniture and fixtures
      3 
 
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
           
 
Trade accounts receivable
   (243)   (54) 
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
   (26)   (16) 
 
Accounts payable
   169   (33) 
 
Accrued expenses
   233   493 
 
Deferred revenue
   302   39 
 
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
   (1,192)   (1,584) 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
         
 
Additions to property and equipment
   (1)    
 
Purchase of assets for lease
   (440)   (427) 
 
Issuance of long-term notes receivable – related party
      (191) 
 
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
   (441)   (618) 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
         
 
Issuance of common stock
      125 
 
Issuance of preferred shares
   2,409   3,506 
 
Offering costs
   (670)   (627) 
 
Payments of notes payable
   (60)   (60) 
 
Payments of equipment leases
   (43)   (39) 
 
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
   1,636   2,905 
 
INCREASE IN CASH
   3   703 
 
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
   731   28 
 
CASH, END OF PERIOD
  $734  $731 
 
Cash paid for income taxes
  $3  $1 
 
Cash paid for interest
  $17  $32 
 
Supplemental disclosure of noncash financing activity:
         
 
Deemed dividend
  $  $85 
 
Conversion of common stock into preferred stock
  $  $1,262 
 
Re-class of warrant liability to equity
  $31    
 
Conversion of advances payable into preferred stock
  $  $125 

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
1.
  • The Company
Semler Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Oregon on August 9, 2007, established C-corporation status in 2012, and reincorporated as a Delaware corporation during 2013. The Company is an emerging medical risk-assessment company that develops, manufactures and markets patented products to identify the risk profile of medicalthat assist healthcare providers in monitoring patients and allow healthcare providers to capture full reimbursement potential for their services.evaluating chronic diseases. The Company’s first patented and FDA cleared product, FloChec® is used in the office setting to allow providers to measure arterial blood flow in the extremities. The Company received FDA 510(k) clearance for FloChec® in February 2010, began Beta testing in the third quarter of 2010, and started commercially leasing FloChec® in January 2011.
The Company has one operating segment and generates revenue domestically primarily through direct leasing primarilylicensing to direct customers. Less than 25% of total revenue is generated through the Company’s distribution partners. The Company is based in Portland, Oregon.
2.
  • Going Concern
The Company has incurred recurring losses since inception and expects to continue to incur losses as a result of costs and expenses related to the Company’s marketing and other promotional activities, research and continued development of its product. As of December 31, 2014, the Company has working capital of $2,682, cash and restricted cash of  $6,256 (which includes $2,100 of restricted cash) and stockholders’ equity of  $3,436. The Company’s principal sources of cash have included the issuance of equity securities, and to a lesser extent, borrowings under loan agreements and revenue from leasing its product. To increase revenues, the Company’s operating expenses will continue to grow and, as a result, the Company will need to generate significant additional revenues to achieve profitability.
The Company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2014 have been prepared under the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional equity or debt financing, attain further operating efficiencies and, ultimately, to generate additional revenue. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Company can give no assurances that additional capital that the Company is able to obtain, if any, will be sufficient to meet the Company’s needs. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital within the next twelve months to continue to fund operations at its current cash expenditure levels, the Company’s operations will need to be curtailed. The foregoing conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
3.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates
Basis for Presentation
The Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
Initial Public Offering
In February 2014, the Company completed its initial public offering (“IPO”) in which it issued and sold 1,430,000 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of  $7.00 per share. The Company received net proceeds of  $7,403 after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of  $848 and other offering expenses of approximately $1,759. The Company incurred $648 of the offering expenses in 2013, and incurred $1,959 of such expenses in the first quarter of 2014. The Company granted the underwriter an option to acquire an additional 214,500 shares of its common stock, which expired April 6, 2014 unexercised, and issued the underwriter warrants to acquire an aggregate of 71,500 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of  $8.75 per share, which become exercisable February 20, 2015 and expire
F-7

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
February 20, 2019. Upon the closing of the IPO, all shares of the Company’s then-outstanding Series A convertible Preferred Stock (1,468,402), Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock (293,750) and Series A-2 convertible Preferred Stock (250,000) automatically converted into an aggregate of 2,012,152 shares of common stock. In addition, the Company’s then outstanding warrants to acquire an aggregate of 1,067,210 shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock and 228,656 shares of Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock were cashlessly exercised at the IPO price for an aggregate of 479,115 shares of common stock. All other outstanding warrants of the Company became exercisable for common stock effective upon the IPO in accordance with their terms.
Use of estimatesEstimates
The preparation of the accompanying financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported, disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses, and related disclosures during the reporting period. Significant items subject to such estimates include revenue recognition, legal contingencies, allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation of equipment on lease, deferred tax asset valuation allowance, unrecognized tax benefits, stock-based compensation and valuation of warrants, common and convertible preferred stock. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment. Management regularly evaluates its estimates and assumptions using historical experience and other factors; however, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The Company derives its revenue predominately from leasinglicensing its FloChec® product to customers pursuant to monthly operating leasesagreements that automatically renew each month with revenue recognized on a daily convention basis. The Company’s arrangements with customers are normally on a month-to-month basis.basis with FloChec™ rent is® fees billed at the rates established in the leasecustomer agreement.
Restricted Cash
On September 30, 2014 the Company entered into a revolving credit line with First Republic Bank. Per the terms of this line of credit, the Company is required to keep a collateral cash account open with First Republic Bank. The cash balance of this collateral cash account must be a minimum of 105% of the total principal balance outstanding on the line of credit. As of December 31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with this requirement.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of allowances for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based on management’s assessment of the collectability of accounts. The Company regularly reviews the adequacy of this allowance for doubtful accounts by considering historical experience, the age of the accounts receivable balances, the credit quality of the customers, current economic conditions, and other factors that may affect customers’ ability to pay to determine whether a specific allowance is appropriate. Accounts receivable deemed uncollectable are charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts when identified.
Assets for Lease
Assets for lease are recorded at cost. At December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, assets for lease consisted of FloChec® devices, which are leased to customers. The cost of such assets for lease is depreciated on a straight-line basis over 36 months for the units outstanding and recorded as cost of revenue.

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)

The Company regularly reviews whether facts and circumstances exist which indicate that the carrying amounts of assets, may not be recoverable or that the useful life of assets are shorter or longer than originally estimated. The Company assesses the recoverability of its assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related asset over their estimated remaining lives against their respective carrying amounts. The Company considers factors such as estimated usage and expected lives of its assets for lease in this analysis. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no impairment indicators.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or an exit price paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurement, are described as follows:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level I that are observable, unadjusted quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data; and
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, which requires the Company to develop its own models.
The financial instruments of the Company consist primarily of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, loans and leases payable and warrant liability of the Company. The carrying amounts of these items with the exception of stock warrants are considered a reasonable estimate of fair value at December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 due to their short term nature and their market interest rate. The fair value of the stock warrants were revalued every reporting period using Level 3 inputs until they were reclassified to additional paid-in-capital in September 2013.rate, which represents level 2 valuations.
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue represents amounts billed to or collected from customers for which the related revenues have not been recognized because one or more of the revenue recognition criteria have not been met. The full amount is expected to be recognized as revenues within one year from the balance sheet date and, therefore, such deferred amounts have been classified as current liabilities in the balance sheets presented. The Company generally invoices its clients in advance of a rental period with payment due upon receipt of the invoice.
Deferred Financing Costs
In 2011, certain of ourthe Company’s Directors personally guaranteed various loans or leases for our companythe Company from First Republic Bank and U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group, see Note 7 “Commitments and Contingencies.7. In consideration for the personal guarantees, these directors were given the opportunity to purchase fully vested warrants exercisable for common stock, which were determined to have a fair value of  $425 at issuance. The deferred financing costs are the fair value of the related warrants less the purchase price of the warrants. These financing costs have beenwere deferred and arewere being amortized over the term of the loan or lease obligation. The amount amortized to interest expense was $147 and $88 both in 2014 and 2013, and 2012.respectively. The leases were paid off early due to the opening of a new line of credit, resulting in acceleration of the expensing of the outstanding deferred financing costs in 2014. See Note 7.
Research and Development
The Company expenses costs related to the research and development associated with the design, development, testing and enhancement of the FloChec® product. Such expenses include salaries and related employee benefits, and fees paid to external service providers.

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)

Stock-Based Compensation
Share basedStock-based compensation expense is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the share basedstock-based awards. The Company recognizes share basedstock-based compensation expense for the portion of each option grant or stock award that is expected to vest over the estimated period of service and vesting. The estimation of the fair value of each stock-based grant on the date of grant involves numerous assumptions by management. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model as the method for determining the estimated grant-date fair value of stock options. The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires the use of highly subjective and complex assumptions which determine the fair value of share basedstock-based awards, including the option’s expected volatility and the price of the underlying stock. In addition, the Company estimates the forfeiture rate of such awards during the requisite service period. Stock basedStock-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the grant.
Employee Benefit Plan
The Company has a savings plan that qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. There were no matching or discretionary employer contributions made to this plan during the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013.
Income Taxes
The Company uses the asset and liability method to account for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences attributable to the differences between financial reporting and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities and operating loss carry forwards, and they are measured using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded for loss carry-forwards and other deferred tax assets where it is more likely than not that such loss carry-forward and deferred tax asset will not be realized. The estimate for the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets requires management to make significant estimates and judgments about projected future operating results. If actual results differ from these projections or if management’s expectations of future results change, it may be necessary to adjust the valuation allowance.
Presentation of Prior Year Data
Certain reclassifications have been made to conform prior year data to the current presentation.
Net Loss per Share
Basic and diluted net loss per common share is calculated by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by dividing the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the periods, respectively, without consideration for outstanding common stock equivalents because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. Common stock equivalents are included in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share only if their effect is dilutive. For the periods presented, the Company’s outstanding common stock equivalents consisted of options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock, all of which are antidilutive, and therefore were not included in the calculation for diluted loss per share.
Going Concern
The Company has incurred recurring losses since inception and expects to continue to incur costs and expenses related to research and development, marketing and other promotional activities, and continued development of the Company’s product. As of December 31, 2013, the Company has net working capital of ($847), cash of $734 and stockholders’ deficit of ($295). The Company’s principal sources of cash have included the issuance of equity and debt securities. As the Company’s revenue grows, the operating expenses will continue to grow and, as a result, the Company will need to generate significant additional revenues to achieve profitability.

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)

During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 532,110 shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock and 298,242 warrants to buy shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share with a three year term to accredited investors for a gross aggregate purchase price of $2,409. In addition, the Chief Executive Officer agreed that while employed by the Company, he would not demand the accrued expenses owed to him until after the closing of an initial public offering, a change of control or the liquidation of the Company.
The Company’s financial statements as of December 31, 2013 have been prepared under the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional equity or debt financing, attain further operating efficiencies and, ultimately, to generate additional revenue. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Company can give no assurances that additional capital that the Company is able to obtain, if any, will be sufficient to meet the Company’s needs. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital within the next twelve months to continue to fund operations at its current cash expenditure levels, the Company’s operations will need to be curtailed. The foregoing conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Excise Tax Liability on Medical Devices
Recognition of the excise tax liability falls under ASC 450, Contingencies, because the tax is assessed on revenues. The Company recognizes the excise tax when a rental payment is invoiced. Based on the guidance in ASC 605-45-50-3 and 50-4, these excise taxes are presented on a gross basis, included in revenue and general and administrative expenses. The excise tax is not an income tax.
3.
  • Assets for lease, net
Assets for lease consist of the following:
   Year ended December 31, 
   2013  2012 
 
Assets for lease
  $688  $452 
 
Less: Accumulated Depreciation
   (176)   (93) 
 
Assets for lease, net
  $512  $359 
Depreciation expense amounted to $129 and $69 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
4.
  • Long-Term Note Receivable
The Company’s related party long-term note receivable consists of the following:
This note receivable was executed on October 31, 2012 to Healthperks, Inc. (“Healthperks”), a company at its inception that was wholly-owned by the Company’s directors, principal stockholders and other current stockholders. It had a maturity date of the earlier of (a) October 31, 2017, or (b) the consummation of the transaction or series of transactions where Healthperks sells its equity securities for the primary purpose of raising working capital which results in aggregate gross proceeds of not less than $2,000, including the cancelation of indebtedness. This note had a 6% interest per annum, and all principal and accrued and unpaid interest were due as noted above. As of December 31, 2012, the full principal and interest balance of $191 has been reserved and the note has been canceled.

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
4.
Assets for lease, net
Assets for lease consist of the following:
As of December 31,
20142013
Assets for lease$956$688
Less: Accumulated Depreciation(283)(176)
Assets for lease, net$673$512
Depreciation expense amounted to $194 and $129 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Reduction to accumulated depreciation for returned items was $87 and $46 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
5.
  • Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
   Year ended December 31, 
   2013  2012 
 
Offering Costs
  $722  $722 
 
Compensation
   264   109 
 
Miscellaneous Accruals
   142   64 
 
Total Accrued Expenses
  $1,128  $895 
As of December 31,
20142013
Offering Costs$407$722
Compensation721264
Miscellaneous Accruals235142
Total Accrued Expenses$1,363$1,128
The accumulated offering costs that were accrued pertain to the consultant’sconsulting fees associated with securing equity financing for the Company.Company prior to the IPO. Prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), the Company’s current CEO performed consulting services for the Company, which included managing finance, sales, marketing, operational and strategic planning for our company, as well as assistance and strategic guidance in securing financing.
6.
  • Concentration of Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk of loss from amounts owed by the financial counterparties. Credit risk can occur at multiple levels; as a result of broad economic conditions, challenges within specific sectors of the economy, or from issues affecting individual companies. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk consist of cash and accounts receivable.
The Company maintains cash with major financial institutions. The Company’s cash consist of bank deposits held with banks that, at times, exceed federally insured limits. The Company limits its credit risk by dealing with counterparties that are considered to be of high credit quality and by performing periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions.
Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is limited due to the large number of customers comprising the payer base. Management periodically monitors the creditworthiness of its customers and believes that it has adequately provided for any exposure to potential credit loss. For the year ended December 31, 2013, there were two customers representing invoicing greater than 10% of all customers, 18.18% and 13.08%, respectively. As of December 31, 2013 there was one customer with an accounts receivable balance in excess of 10% of the total. That customer had 17.57% of the total balance, which amount was paid in full. For the year ended December 31, 2014, there were two customers representing invoicing greater than 10% of all customers, 19.82% and 12.12%, respectively. As of December 31, 2014 there were two customers with accounts receivable balances in excess of 10% of the total, 19.4% and 13.3%, respectively. Both balances have been paid as of the date of this annual report.
F-11

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
7.
Commitments and Contingencies
Facilities Leases
The Company relies on an independent supplierhad no material facilities leases for the manufacturing of FloChecyears ended December 31, 2014 and any delay or disruption2013 and had no rent expense for such years. On September 23, 2014, the Company entered into a 36-month lease agreement for office space for the sales and marketing team located in Menlo Park, CA. The lease term commenced February 1, 2015 and is effective through January 31, 2018. Payments required under the supplyterms of the product, may negatively impactlease are $17.0 per month from February 2015 to January 2016, $17.5 per month from February 2016 to January 2017, and $18.0 per month from February 2017 to January 2018. The Company anticipates total future lease payments of  $186.6 for the operations. The majority ofyear ended December 31, 2015; $209.1 for the products are manufactured at a single facility,year ended December 31, 2016; $215.4 for the year ended December 31, 2017; and $18.0 for the loss of such facility could prevent its vendor from manufacturing FloChec™.
7.
  • Commitments and Contingencies
year ended December 31, 2018.
Equipment Leases and Loans Payable
On February 9, 2011, the Company entered into an Equipment Finance Agreement (the “agreement”) with U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company obtained a $39 secured loan for a 48-month term that hashad an annual fixed interest rate of 13%. The loan iswas secured by the related leased equipment. Under the agreement, the Company makesmade monthly payments consisting of  $1 of principal plus any accrued interest. The agreement providesprovided for customary events of default.default. This loan iswas personally guaranteed by twoa Company directors who aredirector and a principal stockholders.stockholder of the Company. As of December 31, 2013,2014, the Company was in compliance with the material terms ofhas retired this facility. At December 31, 2013, and 2012, the Company had outstanding borrowings of  $13 and $24, respectively.$13.
On May 27, 2011, the Company entered into an Equipment Finance Agreement (the “agreement”) with U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group. Pursuant to the agreement,Agreement, the Company obtained a $109 secured loan for a 60-month term that hashad an annual fixed interest rate of 6%. The loan iswas secured by the related leased equipment. Under the agreement,Agreement, the Company makesmade monthly payments consisting of  $2 of principal plus any accrued interest. The agreement providesAgreement provided for customary events of default.default. This loan

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)

is was personally guaranteed by twoa Company directors who aredirector and a principal stockholders.stockholder of the Company. As of December 31, 2013,2014, the Company was in compliance with the material terms ofhas retired this facility. At December 31, 2013, and 2012, the Company had outstanding borrowings of  $57 and $78, respectively.$57.
At various dates in 2011, the Company entered into Lease Agreements (the Agreements) with Lease Corporation of America. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company obtained an aggregate amount of  $66 for a 60-month term that havehad variable annual interest rates of approximately 14%. The leases arewere secured by the related leased equipment. Under the agreements, the Company makesmade monthly payments of approximately $1 of principal plus any accrued interest. The agreements provideprovided for customary events of default.default. The leases arewere personally guaranteed by a Company director who is a principal stockholder.stockholder of the Company. As of December 31, 2013,2014, the Company was in compliance with the material terms ofhas retired this facility. At December 31, 2013, and 2012, the Company had outstanding borrowings of  $42 and $53, respectively.$42.
On June 17, 2011, the Company entered into a loan agreement with First Republic Bank. Pursuant to the loan agreement, the Company obtained a $150 secured loan for a 60-month term that hashad a variable annual interest rate based on First Republic’s Prime plus a spread of 1.75% p.a. and a floor of 3.25%. p.a. The initial interest rate was 5%. p.a. Under the loan agreement, the Company makesmade monthly payments consisting of  $3 of principal plus any accrued interest. The loan agreement providesprovided for customary events of default. This loan iswas personally guaranteed by a Company director who is a principal stockholder.stockholder of the Company. As of December 31, 2013,2014, the Company was in compliance with the material terms ofhas retired this facility.loan agreement. At December 31, 2013, and 2012, the Company had outstanding borrowings of  $75 and $105, respectively.$75.
On September 13, 2011, the Company entered into an additional loan agreement with First Republic Bank. Pursuant to the loan agreement, the Company obtained a $150 loan for a 60-month term that hashad a variable annual interest rate based on First Republic’s Prime plus a spread of 1.75% and a floor of 3.25%.
F-12

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
The initial annual interest rate was 5%. Under the loan agreement, the Company makesmade monthly payments consisting of  $3 of principal plus any accrued interest. The loan agreement provided for customary events of default. This loan was personally guaranteed by a principal stockholder of the Company. As of December 31, 2014, the Company has retired this loan agreement. At December 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding borrowings of  $83.
On September 30, 2014, the Company entered into a revolving line of credit with First Republic Bank. Pursuant to the line of credit agreement, the Company may borrow up to $2,000 for a 12-month term that has a variable annual interest rate based on First Republic’s Prime less a spread of 2.0% p.a. The initial interest rate is 1.25% p.a. Under the line of credit agreement, the Company will make monthly payments consisting of  $2 of interest, and an annual payment consisting of  $2,002 principal plus any accrued interest. The line of credit agreement provides for customary events of default. This loanline of credit is personally guaranteedsecured by a Company director who is a principal stockholder.$2,100 collateral cash account in the Company’s name at First Republic. As of December 31, 2013,2014, the Company was in compliance with the material terms of this facility. At December 31, 2013 and 2012,2014, the Company had outstanding borrowings of  $83 and $113, respectively.
As$2,000. The line of December 31, 2013, future minimum lease payments under equipment leases werecredit matures September 30, 2015. Accordingly, the entire amount is classified as follows:
 Years  Total 
 
2014
  $47 
 
2015
   41 
 
2016
   24 
 
Total payments
   112 
 
Less: current portion
   47 
 
Equipment leases, net of current portion
  $65 
 
Total payments
   112 
 
Less: amount representing interest
   14 
 
Total
  $98 

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)

As of December 31, 2013, future principal payments under loan obligations were as follows:
 Years  Total 
 
2014
  $60 
 
2015
   60 
 
2016
   38 
 
Total payments
  $158 
 
Less: current portion
   60 
 
Loans payable, net of current portion
  $98 
short-term.
Interest expense under these obligations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $28 and 2012 was $20, and $32, respectively.
Indemnification Obligations:Obligations
The Company enters into agreements with customers, partners, lenders, consultants, lessors, contractors, sales representatives and parties to certain transactions in the ordinary course of the Company’s business. These agreements may require the Company to indemnify the other party against third party claims alleging that its product infringes a patent or copyright. Certain of these agreements require the Company to indemnify the other party against losses arising from: a breach of representations or covenants, claims relating to property damage, personal injury or acts or omissions of the Company, its employees, agents or representatives. The Company has also agreed to indemnify the directors and certain of the officers and employees in accordance with the by-laws of the Company. These indemnification provisions will vary based upon the nature and terms of the agreements. In many cases, these indemnification provisions do not contain limits on the Company’s liability, and the occurrence of contingent events that will trigger payment under these indemnities is difficult to predict. As a result, the Company cannot estimate its potential liability under these indemnities. The Company believes that the likelihood of conditions arising that would trigger these indemnities is remote and, historically, the Company had not made any significant payment under such indemnification provisions. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any liabilities relating to these agreements. In certain cases, the Company has recourse against third parties with respect to the aforesaid indemnities, and the Company believes it maintains adequate levels of insurance coverage to protect the Company with respect to potential claims arising from such agreements.
8.
  • Stockholders’ Deficit
Equity (Deficit)
Authorized Capital:
The Company was incorporated on August 9, 2007, and the Company was authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock at no par.Capital
In December 2007, 850,000 shares of common stock were issued for services rendered by an Officer ofconnection with the Company.
On March 12, 2010, the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation was amended and restatedconversion to authorize the Company to issue up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock at no par.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation was amended and restated to authorize the Company to issue up to 14,000,000 shares, of which 10,000,000 shares were designated as common stock with par value of $0.001 per share and 4,000,000 shares were designated as convertible preferred stock with par value of $0.001 par value per share. The authorized preferred stock for all periods presented is as follows: (i) 2,800,000 shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock, (ii) 800,000 shares of Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock, and (iii) 400,000 shares of Series A-2 convertible Preferred stock.

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)

Duringa Delaware corporation, during the quarter ended September 30, 2013, the Company’s Certificatecertificate of incorporation was amended and restated to authorize the Company to issue up to 54,000,000 shares, of which 50,000,000 shares were designated as common stock with par value of  $0.001 per share and 4,000,000 shares were designated as convertible preferred stock with par value of $0.001 par value per share. The authorized preferred stock for all periods presented is as follows: (i) 2,800,000 shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock, (ii) 800,000 shares of Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock, and (iii) 400,000 shares of Series A-2 convertible Preferred Stock.
A.F-13

  • Semler Scientific, Inc.
    Notes to Financial Statements
    (In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
    A.
    Common Stock
Issuance of Common Stock:Stock
During 2012, the Company issued 27,778 shares of common stock for cash amounting to $125 with less than $1 par value and resulted in $125 additional paid in capital. During the same period, the Company recorded offering costs amounting to $16 and recorded as an offset to additional paid in capital. There were no issuances of common stock during 2013. In February 2014, the Company completed its IPO in which it issued and sold 1,430,000 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of  $7.00 per share. The Company received net proceeds of  $7,403 after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of  $848 and other offering expenses of approximately $1,759. The Company incurred $648 of the offering expenses in 2013, and incurred $1,959 of such expenses in the first quarter of 2014. Upon the closing of the IPO, all shares of the Company’s then-outstanding Series A convertible Preferred Stock (1,468,402), Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock (293,750) and Series A-2 convertible Preferred Stock (250,000) automatically converted into an aggregate of 2,012,152 shares of common stock.
Voting Rights of Common Stock:Stock
Each holder of shares of Common Stock shall beis entitled to one vote for each share thereof held.
Common Stock Warrants:Warrants
In 2012, a certain consultant who performed services to the Company was given the opportunity to purchase common stock warrants with fair value of $33 and paid proceeds to the Company amounting to less than $1 resulting in additional paid-in capital and compensation expense of $33. There were no issuances of common stock warrants during 2013. In February 2014, in connection with the closing of the IPO, the Company’s then outstanding warrants to acquire an aggregate of 1,067,210 shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock and 228,656 shares of Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock were cashlessly exercised at the IPO price for an aggregate of 479,115 shares of common stock. All other then outstanding warrants of the Company became exercisable for 288,214 shares of common stock effective upon the IPO in accordance with their terms. In addition, the Company issued the underwriter for its IPO warrants to acquire an aggregate of 71,500 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of  $8.75 per share, which become exercisable February 20, 2015 and expire February 20, 2019.
Common Stock:Stock
For the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, a total of 3,933,7321,009,214 and 3,103,3813,933,732 shares of common stock, respectively, were reserved for issuance upon (i) conversion of outstanding convertible preferred stock, (ii) exercise of convertible Preferredpreferred or common stock warrants, and (iii) the exercise of outstanding stock options, as follows:
Year ended December 31,
20142013
Convertible preferred stock2,012,152
Preferred stock warrants1,584,080
Common stock warrants359,714
Options649,500337,500
Total1,009,2143,933,732
B.
   Year ended December 31, 
   2013  2012 
 
Convertible preferred stock
   2,012,152   1,480,042 
 
Preferred stock warrants
   1,584,080   1,285,839 
 
Options
   337,500   337,500 
 
Total
   3,933,732   3,103,381 
B.
  • Exchange Agreement
During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, the Company entered into an exchange agreement (“Exchange Agreement”) with all of the holders of its common stock and common stock warrants outstanding, pursuant to which such holders exchanged their shares and warrants of common stock into and for shares and warrants for the purchase of Series A convertible Preferred Stock, Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock and/or Series A-2 convertible Preferred Stock in amounts that were determined in such negotiations (the “Exchange”). During the first half of 2012 ended June 30, 2012, the Company changed from an S Corporation to a C Corporation.
Common stockholders who originally acquired their common stock prior to 2010 received common shares on a 1:1 basis. Common stockholders who originally purchased their common stock at $2/ share received shares of Series A-2 convertible Preferred Stock on a 1:1 basis. Warrant holders for common stock

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)

with an exercise price of $2/share received warrants at the same exercise price and expiration date to purchase shares of Series A-2 convertible Preferred Stock on a 1:1 basis. Common stockholders who originally purchased their common stock at $4/share received shares of Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock on a 1:1 basis and warrants to purchase shares of Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock with an exercise price of $4/share in the amount of 75% of the amount of the A-1 convertible Preferred Stock they had received. Warrant holders for common stock with an exercise price of $4/share received warrants at the same exercise price and expiration date to purchase shares of Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock on a 1:1 basis. Common stockholders who originally purchased their common stock at $4.50/share received shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock on a 1:1 basis and warrants to purchase shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock with an exercise price of $4.50/share in the amount of 75% of the amount of the Series A convertible Preferred Stock they had received, except that one shareholder, who purchased common stock at $4.50/share and a warrant for shares of common stock in the amount of 75% of the amount of the common stock they had received, exchanged these shares and warrant on a 1:1 basis into and for shares and warrants of Series A convertible Preferred Stock. Warrant holders for common stock with an exercise price of $4.50/share received warrants at the same exercise price and expiration date to purchase shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock on a 1:1 basis. Any warrants that had reached their expiration date prior to the exchange received no warrants for preferred stock.
Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, the Company had exchanged 1,459,725 shares of common stock and 358,733 common stock warrants into (A) 786,750 of common stock, (B) 129,225 shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock, (C) 293,750 shares of Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock, and (D) 250,000 shares of Series A-2 convertible Preferred Stock with a total of 583,441 preferred stock warrants.
Immediately prior to the exchange, the fair value of the Company’s equity was determined to be $1,377, specifically (a) the fair value of the common stock was $1,255 with 1,459,725 shares outstanding determined to be $0.86 per share, (b) the fair value of the warrants to purchase common stock was $77, and (c) the fair value of the options to purchase common stock was $45.
Immediately after the exchange, the fair value of the Company’s equity was determined to be $1,377 specifically (a) the common stock had a fair value of $0.10 per share for a total fair value of $77, (b) the Series A convertible Preferred Stock had a fair value of $4.43 per share for a total fair value of $572, (c) the Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock had a fair value of $1.64 per share for a total fair value of $482, (d) the Series A-2 convertible Preferred Stock had a fair value of $0.83 per share for a total fair value of $208, (e) the warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock had a fair value of $31 or $0.10 per underlying share, and (f) the fair value of the options to purchase common stock was $4.
The aggregate fair value of the common stock prior to the exchange was $1,255 and the fair value of the common and convertible preferred stock after the exchange was $1,340, which gives effect to a reduction of additional paid in capital of $85. As a result of this exchange, the Company reports a deemed dividend of $85 on its statement of operations and makes a supplemental disclosure of $85 in non-cash activity on its cash flow statement. Due to state law, dividends may not be declared out of accumulated deficit.
As a result of the Exchange Agreement, the Company recorded a warrant liability of $31 representing the fair value of the warrants to purchase Series A convertible Preferred Stock, which were determined to be liabilities due to the redemption right of the Series A convertible Preferred Stock (see C. Convertible Preferred Stock — Redemption and Conversion section below for further details).
Expenses related to the exchange were $51 and were charged to the statement of operations.
Valuation Methodology:
The fair value of the Series A convertible Preferred Stock is based on arm’s length transactions between the Company and new investors who purchased Series A convertible Preferred Stock during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 and the quarter ended September 30, 2012. The fair value on the date of issuance during 2013 and 2012 of the warrants to purchase convertible preferred stock was determined

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)

using the Option Pricing Method. The Option Pricing Method (“OPM”) values the various securities by creating a series of call options with exercise prices based on the liquidation preference and conversion behavior of the different classes of equity. The OPM values the common stock and securities convertible to common stock by creating a series of call options with exercise prices based on the liquidation preference of convertible preferred stock.
In the OPM analysis, equity value thresholds are determined for the following events assuming a time to liquidity of 18 months:
 — 
  • Payment of liquidation preferences to Series A convertible Preferred Stock
 — 
  • Payment of liquidation preferences to Series A-1 and A-2 Stock convertible Preferred Stock
 — 
  • Exercise of warrants for Series A convertible Preferred Stock
 — 
  • Exercise of stock options
 — 
  • Conversion of Series A-2 convertible Preferred Stock to common stock and exercise of Series A-2 warrants and conversion to common stock
 — 
  • Conversion of Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock to common stock and exercise of Series A-1 warrants and conversion to common stock
 — 
  • All Series A convertible Preferred reaches caps, after receiving preferential participation distribution
 — 
  • Conversion of all Series A convertible Preferred Stock to common stock
Other assumptions included in this analysis are expected volatility of 50.7% and risk-free interest rate of 0.27%.
Volatility — Since the Company has no trading history by which to determine the volatility of its own common stock price, the expected volatility being used is derived from the historical stock volatilities of a representative industry peer group of comparable publicly listed companies over a period approximately equal to the expected term of the options.
Risk-free Interest Rate — The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury zero coupon issues with remaining terms similar to the expected term on the options.
Expected Dividend — The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends and does not plan to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future, and therefore, used an expected dividend yield of zero in the valuation model.
C.
  • Convertible Preferred Stock
During the third quarter of 2012, the Company issued 807,067 shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 606,966 shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock with an exercise price of $4.50 per share for an aggregate of cash amounting to $3,506 and conversion of advances payable amounting to $125. The Company recorded offering costs relating to these purchases amounting to $611 as a reduction to the Series A convertible Preferred Stock.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 532,110 shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock and 298,242 warrants to buy shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock at an exercise price of  $4.50 per share with a three year term to accredited investors for an aggregate purchase price of  $2,409. The Company recorded offering costs relating to these purchases amounting to $22 as a charge to additional paid in capital.

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
C.
As of December 31, 2013, convertible Preferred Stock was comprised of the following:
   
Preferred
shares
authorized
  
Shares issued
and
outstanding
  
Liquidation
Preference/
Redemption
Value
  
Common Stock
Issuable Upon
Conversion
 
 
Series A convertible
   2,800,000   1,468,402  $6,608   1,468,402 
 
Series A-1 convertible
   800,000   293,750  $1,175   293,750 
 
Series A-2 convertible
   400,000   250,000  $500   250,000 
The rights of the convertible Preferred Stock are as follows:
Voting:
The holders of Series A convertible Preferred Stock, Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock and Series A-2 convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which such preferred stock is convertible.
Dividends:
The holders of convertible preferred stock are entitled to receive, when and if declared by the Board of Directors, non-cumulative dividends equal to $0.36, $0.32 and $0.16 per share per annum for Series A convertible Preferred Stock, Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock and Series A-2 convertible Preferred Stock, subject to adjustments, respectively.
As of December 31, 2013, no dividends have been declared on any of the classes of convertible preferred stock.
Redemption and Conversion:
Each share of Series A convertible Preferred Stock, Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock and Series A-2 convertible Preferred Stock is, at the option of the holder, convertible into shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments.
The outstanding shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock, Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock and Series A-2 convertible Preferred Stock automatically convert into common stock on the closing of an underwritten public offering of common stock under the Securities Act of 1933 in which the Company receives at least $30.0 million in aggregate gross proceeds and the offering price per share is at least $22.50.
At any time after June 30, 2017, at the election of each of the Requisite Holders, as defined in the amended articles of incorporation, the Company shall redeem all outstanding shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock which have not been converted to common stock, in three annual installments. Requisite Holders is defined as two specific principal stockholders, but, with respect to each, only for so long as such entity holds not less than 50% of the shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock held by it as of July 6, 2012. Under ASC 480, equity securities are required to be classified outside permanent equity if they are redeemable or may become redeemable for cash or other assets on a determinable date at the option of the security holder. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2012, Series A convertible Preferred Stock had been classified outside of permanent equity, in mezzanine.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, the Company, a majority of the outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock (on an as-converted basis), our Board of Directors and the Requisite Holders a) amended the rights of Series A convertible Preferred Stock, such to remove this redemption right which resulted in the re-classification of this stock and warrants for this stock into permanent equity; and b) modified the automatic conversion provision to eliminate the minimums of aggregate gross proceeds and offering price of an underwritten public offering of common stock.

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)

Liquidation Rights:
In the event of liquidation, holders of Series A convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, prior and in preference to the holders of Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock, Series A-2 convertible Preferred Stock and common stock, a liquidation preference distribution of $4.50 per share plus any declared but unpaid dividends. Also, in the event of liquidation, holders of Series A-1 and A-2 convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to, prior and in preference to holders of common stock, a liquidation preference distribution of $4.00 and $2.00 per share, respectively, plus any declared but unpaid dividends. Any remaining assets of the Company shall be distributed pro-rata amongst the holders of the Company’s common stock.
D.
  • Warrants to Purchase Convertible Preferred Stock
In addition to the warrants described above, in 2012, a certain consultant who performed services for the Company was given the opportunity to purchase warrants to buy 10,556 shares of Common Stock with a fair value of $33 and paid proceeds to the Company amounting to less than $1 resulting in additional paid-in capital and compensation expenses of $33.
E.
  • Offering Costs Associated With IPO
During the year ended December 31, 2013 the Company incurred a total of  $648 of offering costs associated with IPO efforts, of which $456 was paid.paid prior to the end of 2013. The Company estimatesincurred $1,959 of such expenses in the first quarter of 2014, all of which have been paid as of the date of this annual report.
9.
Stock Option Plan
The Company’s stock-based compensation program is designed to attract and retain employees while also aligning employees’ interests with the interests of its stockholders. Stock options have been granted to employees under the stockholder-approved 2007 Key Person Stock Option Plan (“2007 Plan”) or the stockholder-approved 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”). Stockholder approval of the 2014 Plan became effective in September 2014. The 2014 Plan provides that it will incur an additional the aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2014 Plan may not exceed 450,000 shares (the “Share Reserve”). However, the Share Reserve automatically increases on January 1st$1,590 in offering costs of each year, for a period of not more than 10 years, beginning on January 1st of the year following the year in which the 2014 Plan became effective and ending on (and including) January 1, 2024, in an amount equal to 4% of the total number of $2,238.
9.
  • Stock Option Plan
shares of common stock outstanding on December 31st of the preceding calendar year. The Company’s Board of Directors adoptedmay act prior to January 1st of a given year to provide that there will be no January 1st increase in the 2007 Key Stock Option Plan (the “2007 Plan”) under which employees, directors and other eligible participants mayShare Reserve for such year or that the increase in the Share Reserve for such year will be granted non-statutory stock options to purchasea lesser number of shares of common stock than would otherwise occur. The Share Reserve is currently 468,000 shares for the Company’s common stock. The exercise priceyear ending December 31, 2015.
In light of stockholder approval of the options shall not be less than2014 Plan, the estimated fair value of the underlying shares of the common stock on theCompany will no longer grant date. The Company has estimated the fair value of the stock options as of the grant date to be based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Options that expire are canceled and returned toequity awards under the 2007 Plan. Options generally vest over four years and expire ten years from the dateAs of grant.
In 2012, the BoardDecember 31, 2014, 0 shares of directors increased the numberan aggregate total of common407,500 shares reservedwere available for issuancefuture stock-based compensation grants under the 2007 Plan by 250,000and 200,000 shares to aof an aggregate total of 456,500 shares. As of December 2013 and 2012, there450,000 shares were 119,000 and 119,000 shares, respectively, available for grantfuture stock-based compensation grants under the 20072014 Plan.
Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the estimated fairclosing market value as of December 31, 2014 of the underlying common stock and the exercise price of outstanding, in-the-money options. A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information for 20132014 and 20122013 is as follows:
Options Outstanding
Number of
Stock Options
Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (In Years)
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Balance, January 1, 2013337,500$1.827.20$0
Options granted
Balance, December 31, 2013337,500$0.526.16$2,693
Options granted320,0002.48
Options exercised(8,000)0.52$17
Balance, December 31, 2014649,500$1.497.44$474
Exercisable as of December 31, 2013337,500$0.526.16$2,693
Exercisable as of December 31, 2014399,552$1.106.01$474
   Options Outstanding 
   
Number of
Stock Options
Outstanding
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
  
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (In Years)
  
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2011
   233,000  $1.95   7.09  $526 
 
Options granted
   104,500   1.53           
 
Balance, December 31, 2012
   337,500  $1.82   7.20  $0 
 
Options granted
                   
 
Balance, December 31, 2013
   337,500                
 
Exercisable as of December 31, 2012
   182,600  $0.52   7.06  $0 
The total compensation cost related to unvested stock option awards not yet recognized was $332 and $0 as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The weighted average period over which the total unrecognized compensation cost related to these unvested stock awards is 3.86 years. The total estimated grant date fair value of unvested options was $332 and $0 as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)

   Options Outstanding 
   
Number of
Stock Options
Outstanding
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
  
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (In Years)
  
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
 
 
Exercisable as of December 31, 2013
   337,500  $0.52   6.16  $2,693 
On September 30, 2012,The total estimated grant date fair value of options vested during the Company modified all of its outstanding stock options to reduce the exercise price to $0.52 per share. The Company recorded an incremental stock based compensation expense of $34 as a result of the modification.
years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $190 and $81, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2012 was $0.92. The total estimated2014 is $1.63 per share or an aggregate grant date fair value of  $523. There were no options vestedgranted during the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $81 and $40, respectively.2013.
In June 2013, the Company accelerated the vesting of all thethen outstanding stock options, and as a result, all of the then outstanding 337,500 stock options granted under the 2007 Plan were vested and exercisable as of June 30, 2013. Stock-based compensation expense of  $121$141 was recorded at the time of the acceleration to account for all the remaining unrecognized compensation costs. For the year ended December 31, 2013, there were no grants, exercises, or cancellations of stock options.
On July 24, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors granted 70,000 stock options under the 2007 Plan. These options were 100% vested and exercisable at the date of issue. The Company has recorded $178 of stock based compensation expense associated with these grants. During 2014, there were 70,000 grants, 8,000 exercised, and no cancelations of stock options under the 2007 Plan.
On November 11, 2014 the Company’s Board of Directors granted options to acquire an aggregate of 250,000 shares under the 2014 Plan. The options vest on a monthly schedule over 48 months such that they are vested in full on the four-year anniversary of the grant date. The Company has recorded $12 of stock based compensation expense associated with these grants. As of December 31, 2014 there were 250,000 grants, no exercises and no cancelations of stock options under the 2014 Plan.
Determining the Fair Value of Stock Options
The Company uses the Black-Scholes pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant. The fair value of the options granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the following assumptions for the periods presented:
Year ended December 31,
20132012
Expected term (in years)
    —    6.25
Risk-free interest rate
0.55%
Expected volatility
46.8% – 68.9%
Expected dividend rate
0%
Year ended December 31,
20142013
Expected term (in years)5
Risk-free interest rate1.6%
Expected volatility82.2%
Expected dividend rate0%
The assumptions are based on the following for each of the years presented:
Valuation Method — The Company estimates the fair value of its stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Expected Term — The Company estimates the expected term consistent with the simplified method identified by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)(“SEC”). The Company elected to use the simplified method because of its limited history of stock option exercise activity and its stock options meet the criteria of the “plain-vanilla” options as defined by the SEC. The simplified method calculates the expected term as the average of the vesting and contractual terms of the award.
Volatility — Since the Company has no trading history by which to determine the volatility of its own common stock price, the expected volatility being used is derived from the historical stock volatilities of a representative industry peer group of comparable publicly listed companies over a period approximately equal to the expected term of the options.
Risk-free Interest Rate — The risk-free interest rate is based on median U.S. Treasury zero coupon issues with remaining terms similar to the expected term on the options.

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)

Expected Dividend — The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends and does not plan to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future, and therefore, used an expected dividend yield of zero in the valuation model.
Forfeiture — The Company estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The Company uses historical data to estimate pre-vesting forfeitures and records stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. All stock-based payment awards are amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods. If the Company’s actual forfeiture rate is materially different from its estimate, the stock-based compensation expense could be significantly different from what the Company has recorded in the current period.
The Company has recorded an expense of  $141$190 and $96$141 as it relates to stock-based compensation infor the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, and 2012, respectively, which was allocated as follows based on the role and responsibility of the recipient in the Company:
Year ended December 31,
20142013
Cost of Revenue$1$
Engineering and Product Development13
Sales and Marketing421
General and Administrative184117
Total$190$141
10.
   2013  2012 
 
Engineering and Product Development
  $3  $4 
 
Sales and Marketing
   21   8 
 
General and Administrative
   117   84 
 
Total
  $141  $96 
10.
  • Income Taxes
The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:
   2013  2012 
 
Current provision:
         
 
Federal
  $  $ 
 
State
      3 
 
Deferred provision:
         
 
Federal
       
 
State
       
 
Total
  $  $3 
20142013
Current tax provision:
Federal$$ —
State9
Deferred tax provision:
Federal
State
Total$9$
A summary of the differences between the Company’s effective income tax rate and the Federal statutory income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 is as follows:
   2013  2012 
 
Federal statutory rate
   34.00%   34.00% 
 
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
   0.01%   (0.07)% 
 
Change in valuation allowance
   (34.03)%   (31.13)% 
 
Other
   0.04%   (2.91)% 
 
Effective income tax
   0.02%   (0.11)% 
“Subchapter S” Election Impact on Taxes
On January 1, 2012 the Company terminated its S corporation tax election and was therefore subject to corporate income taxes.
20142013
Federal statutory rate34.00%34.00%
State income tax rate, net of federal benefit(0.13)%0.01%
Change in valuation allowance(33.62)%(34.03)%
Other(0.45)%0.04%
Effective income tax rate(0.20)%0.02%

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)

Deferred tax assets are comprised of the following at December 31:
   2013  2012 
 
Net operating loss carryforward
  $1,562  $963 
 
Deferred Revenue
   144    
 
Depreciation & amortization
   58   94 
 
Stock-based compensation
   93   80 
 
Accruals and reserves
   48   42 
 
Deferred tax assets
   1,905   1,179 
 
Valuation allowance
   (1,905)   (1,179) 
 
Net deferred tax assets
  $  $ 
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards$2,966$1,562
Deferred Revenue233144
Depreciation and amortization4758
Stock-based compensation16393
Accrual and reserve2537
Research and Development Credits10611
Total gross deferred tax assets3,5401,905
Less valuation allowance(3,540)(1,905)
Net deferred tax assets$$
As of December 31, 2013,2014, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $3,982 expiring$8,200 for Federal and $2,800 for California, which begin to expire in 2033.2032. The Company also has Federal research and development credit carryforwards of approximately $100 at December 31, 2014 which begin to expire in 2032.
ASC 740-10, Income Taxes, prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition.
The Company’s ability to use operating loss carryforwards and tax credits to offset future taxable income is subject to restrictions under Section 382 of the United States Internal Revenue Code (the “Internal Revenue Code”). These restrictions may limit the future useThe annual limitation under Section 382 of future operating loss carryforwards and tax credits if certain ownership changes described in the Internal Revenue Code occur.is approximately $1,200 based on the stock market value of the Company established on the date of the IPO in February 2014. Future changes in stock ownership may occur that would create further limitations on the Company’s use of nett operating loss carryforwards and tax credits. In such a situation, the Company may be required to pay income taxes, even though significant operating loss carryforwards and tax credits might exist.
As of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits and no significant adjustments to liabilities or operations were required for uncertain tax positions under ASC 740-10. The Company’s practice is to recognize interest and penalty expenses related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense, which was zero for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012.2013. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal and several state tax jurisdictions.
The Company’s tax years beginning 20092010 remain open for examination by the federal and state tax authorities for three and four years, respectively. Tax years beginning 2012 will remain open for examination from the date of utilization of any net operating loss or credits for three or four years federal and state respectively.credits. The Company does not have any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits will increase or decrease within 12 months of the year-ended December 31, 2013.2014.
11.F-18

  • Semler Scientific, Inc.
    Notes to Financial Statements
    (In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)
    11.
    Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share:
Year ended December 31,
20142013
Net loss��$(4,515)$(2,233)
Weighted average shares outstanding4,105,754786,750
Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to common stockholders$(1.10)$(2.84)
   For the year ended December 31, 
   2013  2012 
 
Net loss
  $(2,233)  $(2,741) 
 
Deemed dividend
     $(85) 
 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
  $(2,233)  $(2,826) 
 
Weighted average shares outstanding
   786,750   1,113,622 
 
Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to common stockholders
  $(2.84)  $(2.54) 

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data)

SinceBecause the Company was in a loss position for each of the periods presented, diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share for each period as the inclusion of all potential common shares outstanding would have been anti-dilutive. The following weighted average shares outstanding of common stock equivalents were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the periods presented because including them would have been anti-dilutive:
Year ended December 31,
20142013
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Convertible preferred stock1,614,531
Convertible preferred stock warrants1,361,218
Common stock warrants304,373
Options403,662337,500
Total708,0353,313,249
12.
   Year Ended December 31, 
   2013  2012 
 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
         
 
Convertible preferred stock
   1,614,531   542,678 
 
Convertible preferred stock warrants
   1,361,218   471,161 
 
Common stock warrants
      170,152 
 
Options
   337,500   267,758 
 
Total
   3,313,249   1,451,749 
Subsequent Events
On January 1, 2015, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer received a stock option grant for 75,000 shares under the 2014 Plan. The options vest on a monthly schedule over 48 months such that they are vested in full on the four-year anniversary of the grant date.
12.F-19

  • Pro forma basic
    Semler Scientific, Inc.
    Condensed Balance Sheets
    (In thousands, except share and diluted net loss per share
amounts)
March 31,
2015
December 31,
2014
(Unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash$3,061$4,156
Restricted Cash2,1002,100
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of  $54 and $28, respectively356355
Prepaid expenses and other current assets144135
Total current assets5,6616,746
Assets for lease, net662673
Property and equipment, net269
Long-term deposits1717
Deferred financing costs3755
Total assets$6,403$7,500
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$89$89
Accrued expenses1,2261,363
Deferred revenue493612
Loans payable2,0002,000
Total current liabilities3,8084,064
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 4,858,517 and
4,741,017 shares issued, and 4,833,517 and 4,716,017 outstanding (net of
treasury shares of 25,000 and 25,000), respectively
55
Additional paid-in capital17,82917,298
Accumulated deficit(15,239)(13,867)
Total stockholders’ equity2,5953,436
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$6,403$7,500
The following table presents the calculation
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.
F-20

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Condensed Statements of pro forma basicOperations
(In thousands, except share and diluted net loss per share computedamounts)
Three months ended March 31,
20152014
(Unaudited)
Revenue$1,202$837
Operating expenses:
Cost of revenue220155
Engineering and product development309229
Sales and marketing1,228746
General and administrative793497
Total operating expenses2,5501,627
Loss from operations(1,348)(790)
Other expense:
Interest and other expense(24)(27)
Other expense(24)(27)
Net loss$(1,372)$(817)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted$(0.29)$(0.36)
Weighted average number of shares used in computing basic and diluted loss per share4,763,5732,240,703
See accompanying notes to give effectunaudited condensed financial statements.
F-21

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Three months ended March 31,
20152014
(Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss$(1,372)$(817)
Reconciliation of Net Loss to Net Cash Used in Operating Activities:
Amortization of deferred financing costs1823
Depreciation5947
Loss on disposal of assets for lease2516
Allowance for doubtful accounts5150
Stock-based compensation expense33
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable(52)21
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(9)(176)
Accounts payable(116)
Accrued expenses(137)58
Deferred revenue(119)(132)
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities(1,503)(1,026)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to property and equipment(19)(4)
Purchase of assets for lease(71)(116)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities(90)(120)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock49810,010
Offering costs(1,959)
Payments of loans payable(15)
Payments of equipment leases(12)
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities4988,024
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH(1,095)6,878
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD4,156734
CASH, END OF PERIOD$3,061$7,612
Cash paid for interest$8$4
Supplemental disclosure of noncash financing activity:
Conversion of preferred stock into common stock$$6,707
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.
F-22

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
1.
Basis of Presentation
Semler Scientific, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Semler” or “the Company”), prepared the assumed conversionunaudited interim financial statements included in this report in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and applicable rules and regulations of the convertible preferred stock into common stock uponSecurities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial reporting. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. As such, the information included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 13, 2015 (the “Annual Report”). The balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 included in this report has been derived from the audited financial statements included in the Annual Report. In the opinion of management, these financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a qualifiedfair statement of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future period, including the full year. Items in prior year financial statements have been adjusted to conform with the current year presentation.
Initial Public Offering
In February 2014, the Company completed its initial public offering (“IPO”) in which it issued and sold 1,430,000 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of  $7.00 per share. The Company received net proceeds of  $7,403 after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of  $848 and other offering expenses of approximately $1,759. The Company incurred $648 of the offering expenses in 2013, and incurred $1,959 of such expenses in the first quarter of 2014. The Company granted the underwriter an overallotment option to acquire an additional 214,500 shares of its common stock, which expired April 6, 2014 unexercised, and issued the underwriter warrants to acquire an aggregate of 71,500 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of  $8.75 per share, which became exercisable February 20, 2015 and expire February 20, 2019. Upon the closing of the IPO, all shares of the Company’s common stock:
   
Pro forma(1)
 
 Pro forma net loss per share, basic and diluted:     
 
Pro forma net loss
  $(2,233) 
 
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding:
     
 
Common stock
   786,750 
 
Convertible preferred stock
   2,012,152 
 
Total Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding
   2,798,902 
 
Pro forma net loss per share, basic and diluted
  $(0.80) 
(1)
  • Pro forma, as adjusted amounts give effect to the issuancethen-outstanding Series A convertible Preferred Stock (1,468,402), Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock (293,750) and Series A-2 convertible Preferred Stock (250,000) automatically converted into an aggregate of 2,012,152 shares of common stock as a resultstock. In addition, the Company’s then outstanding warrants to acquire an aggregate of 1,067,210 shares of Series A convertible Preferred Stock and 228,656 shares of Series A-1 convertible Preferred Stock were cashlessly exercised at the IPO price for an aggregate of 479,115 shares of common stock. All other outstanding warrants of the automatic conversion of all of our outstanding convertible preferredCompany became exercisable for common stock as of December 31, 2013effective upon the IPO in accordance with their terms.
2.
Going Concern
The Company has incurred recurring losses since inception and expects to continue to incur losses as a result of an assumed initial public offering but excludes:costs and expenses related to the Company’s marketing and other promotional activities, research and continued development of its product. As of March 31, 2015, the Company has working capital of $1,853, cash and restricted cash of  $5,161 (which includes $2,100 of restricted cash) and stockholders’ equity of  $2,595. The Company’s principal sources of cash have included the issuance of equity securities, and to a lesser extent, borrowings under loan agreements and revenue from leasing its product. To increase revenues, the Company’s operating expenses will continue to grow and, as a result, the Company will need to generate significant additional revenues to achieve profitability. In order to execute on its business plan, and given current available cash, the Company anticipates that it will need to raise additional capital.
The Company’s financial statements as of March 31, 2015 have been prepared under the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional equity or debt financing, attain further operating efficiencies and, ultimately, to generate additional revenue. The financial statements do not include any adjustments
(a)
  • any shares that would result from the automatic cashless exercise of outstanding warrants for convertible preferred stock and subsequent automatic conversion of that convertible preferred stock into common stock upon the closing of an assumed public offering; and
(b)
  • the sale of any shares of common stock in an assumed public offering.
13.
  • Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through February 17, 2014, the date the financial statements were available for issuance.

Semler Scientific, Inc.
[MISSING IMAGE: t1300651_backcovr.jpg]Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Company can give no assurances that additional capital that the Company is able to obtain, if any, will be sufficient to meet the Company’s needs. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital within the next twelve months to continue to fund operations at its current cash expenditure levels, the Company’s operations will need to be curtailed. The foregoing conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
3.
Assets for Lease
Assets for lease consist of the following:
March 31, 2015December 31, 2014
Assets for lease$988$956
Less: Accumulated Depreciation(326)(283)
Assets for lease, net$662$673
Depreciation expense amounted to $57 and $47 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, respectively. Reduction to accumulated depreciation for returned items was $14 and $16 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, respectively.
4.
Deferred Financing Costs
As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, deferred financing costs have the net amounts of  $37 and $55, respectively. The amounts amortized to interest expense were $18 and $23 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, respectively. Per details in Note 6, leases were paid off early due to the opening of a new line of credit, resulting in acceleration of the expensing of the outstanding deferred financing costs.
5.
Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
March 31, 2015December 31, 2014
Offering Costs$317$407
Compensation569721
Miscellaneous Accruals340235
Total Accrued Expenses$1,226$1,363
The accumulated offering costs that were accrued pertain to consulting fees associated with securing equity financing for the Company prior to the IPO. Prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), the Company’s current CEO performed consulting services for the Company, which included managing finance, sales, marketing, operational and strategic planning for our company, as well as assistance and strategic guidance in securing financing.
6.
Commitments and Contingencies
Facilities Leases
For the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company recognized $32 in facilities lease expense. The Company had no material facilities leases for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and had no rent expense for such period. On September 23, 2014, the Company entered into a 36-month lease agreement for office space for the sales and marketing team located in Menlo Park, CA. The lease term commenced February 1, 2015 and is effective through January 31, 2018. Payments required under the terms of the lease are $17.0 per month from February 2015 to January 2016, $17.5 per month from February 2016 to January
F-24

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
2017, and $18.0 per month from February 2017 to January 2018. The Company anticipates total future lease payments of  $186.6 for the year ended December 31, 2015; $209.1 for the year ended December 31, 2016; $215.4 for the year ended December 31, 2017; and $18.0 for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Equipment Leases and Loans Payable
On February 9, 2011, the Company entered into an Equipment Finance Agreement with U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company obtained a $39 secured loan for a 48-month term that had an annual fixed interest rate of 13%. The loan was secured by the related leased equipment. Under the agreement, the Company made monthly payments consisting of  $1 of principal plus any accrued interest. The agreement provided for customary events of default. This loan was personally guaranteed by a Company director and a principal stockholder of the Company. This facility was retired in September 2014. At March 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding borrowings of  $10.
On May 27, 2011, the Company entered into an Equipment Finance Agreement with U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company obtained a $109 secured loan for a 60-month term that had an annual fixed interest rate of 6%. The loan was secured by the related leased equipment. Under the Agreement, the Company made monthly payments consisting of  $2 of principal plus any accrued interest. The Agreement provided for customary events of default. This loan was personally guaranteed by a Company director and a principal stockholder of the Company. This facility was retired in September 2014. At March 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding borrowings of  $50.
At various dates in 2011, the Company entered into Lease Agreements with Lease Corporation of America. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company obtained an aggregate amount of  $66 for a 60-month term that had variable annual interest rates of approximately 14%. The leases were secured by the related leased equipment. Under the agreements, the Company made monthly payments of approximately $1 of principal plus any accrued interest. The agreements provided for customary events of default. The leases were personally guaranteed by a principal stockholder of the Company. This facility was retired in September 2014. At March 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding borrowings of  $40.
On June 17, 2011, the Company entered into a loan agreement with First Republic Bank. Pursuant to the loan agreement, the Company obtained a $150 secured loan for a 60-month term that had a variable interest rate based on First Republic’s Prime plus a spread of 1.75% p.a. and a floor of 3.25% p.a. The initial interest rate was 5% p.a. Under the loan agreement, the Company made monthly payments consisting of  $3 of principal plus any accrued interest. The loan agreement provided for customary events of default. This loan was personally guaranteed by a principal stockholder of the Company. This loan agreement was retired in September 2014. At March 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding borrowings of  $68.
On September 13, 2011, the Company entered into an additional loan agreement with First Republic Bank. Pursuant to the loan agreement, the Company obtained a $150 loan for a 60-month term that had a variable annual interest rate based on First Republic’s Prime plus a spread of 1.75% and a floor of 3.25%. The initial interest rate was 5%. Under the loan agreement, the Company made monthly payments consisting of  $3 of principal plus any accrued interest. The loan agreement provided for customary events of default. This loan was personally guaranteed by a principal stockholder of the Company. This loan agreement was retired in September 2014. At March 31, 2014, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $75.
On September 30, 2014, the Company entered into a revolving line of credit with First Republic Bank. Pursuant to the line of credit agreement, the Company may borrow up to $2,000 for a 12-month term that has a variable annual interest rate based on First Republic’s Prime less a spread of 2.0% p.a. The initial interest rate is 1.25% p.a. Under the line of credit agreement, the Company will make monthly payments consisting of  $2 of interest, and an annual payment consisting of  $2,002 principal plus any accrued interest. The line of credit agreement provides for customary events of default. This line of credit is secured by a
F-25

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
$2,100 collateral cash account in the Company’s name at First Republic. As of March 31, 2015, the Company was in compliance with the material terms of this facility. At March 31, 2015, the Company had outstanding borrowings of  $2,000. The line of credit matures September 30, 2015. Accordingly, the entire amount is classified as short-term.
Interest expense under these obligations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was $6 and $4, respectively.
Indemnification Obligations
The Company enters into agreements with customers, partners, lenders, consultants, lessors, contractors, sales representatives and parties to certain transactions in the ordinary course of the Company’s business. These agreements may require the Company to indemnify the other party against third party claims alleging that its product infringes a patent or copyright. Certain of these agreements require the Company to indemnify the other party against losses arising from: a breach of representations or covenants, claims relating to property damage, personal injury or acts or omissions of the Company, its employees, agents or representatives. The Company has also agreed to indemnify the directors and certain of the officers and employees in accordance with the by-laws of the Company. These indemnification provisions will vary based upon the nature and terms of the agreements. In many cases, these indemnification provisions do not contain limits on the Company’s liability, and the occurrence of contingent events that will trigger payment under these indemnities is difficult to predict. As a result, the Company cannot estimate its potential liability under these indemnities. The Company believes that the likelihood of conditions arising that would trigger these indemnities is remote and, historically, the Company had not made any significant payment under such indemnification provisions. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any liabilities relating to these agreements. In certain cases, the Company has recourse against third parties with respect to the aforesaid indemnities, and the Company believes it maintains adequate levels of insurance coverage to protect the Company with respect to potential claims arising from such agreements.
7.
Net Loss Per Common Share
Because the Company was in a loss position for each of the periods presented, diluted net loss per share is the same as basic net loss per share for each period as the inclusion of all potential common shares outstanding would have been anti-dilutive. The following outstanding shares of common stock equivalents were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the periods presented because including them would have been anti-dilutive:
Three Months ended March 31,
20152014
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Convertible preferred stock1,266,072
Convertible preferred stock warrants996,724
Common stock warrants359,714133,377
Options717,548337,500
Total1,077,2622,733,673
8.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company’s stock-based compensation program is designed to attract and retain employees while also aligning employees’ interests with the interests of its stockholders. Stock options have been granted to employees under the stockholder-approved 2007 Key Person Stock Option Plan (“2007 Plan”) or the stockholder-approved 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”). Stockholder approval of the 2014 Plan
F-26

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
became effective in September 2014. The 2014 Plan provides that the aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2014 Plan may not exceed 450,000 shares (the “Share Reserve”). However, the Share Reserve automatically increases on January 1st of each year, for a period of not more than 10 years, beginning on January 1st of the year following the year in which the 2014 Plan became effective and ending on (and including) January 1, 2024, in an amount equal to 4% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on December 31st of the preceding calendar year. The Company’s Board of Directors may act prior to January 1st of a given year to provide that there will be no January 1st increase in the Share Reserve for such year or that the increase in the Share Reserve for such year will be a lesser number of shares of common stock than would otherwise occur. The Share Reserve is currently 638,640 shares for the year ending December 31, 2015.
In light of stockholder approval of the 2014 Plan, the Company will no longer grant equity awards under the 2007 Plan. As of March 31, 2015, 0 shares of an aggregate total of 407,500 shares were available for future stock-based compensation grants under the 2007 Plan and 332,390 shares of an aggregate total of 638,640 shares were available for future stock-based compensation grants under the 2014 Plan.
Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the closing market value as of March 31, 2015 of the underlying common stock and the exercise price of outstanding, in-the-money options. A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information for 2015 and 2014 is as follows:
Options Outstanding
Number of
Stock Options
Outstanding
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(In Years)
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)
Balance, January 1, 2015649,500$1.497.44$474
Options granted75,0001.96
Options canceled(18,750)2.10
Balance, March 31, 2015705,750$1.527.40$1,421
Exercisable as of March 31, 2015432,729$1.185.98$1,029
The total compensation cost related to unvested stock option awards not yet recognized was $377 and $0 as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The weighted average period over which the total unrecognized compensation cost related to these unvested stock awards is 1.55 years. The total estimated grant date fair value of unvested options was $377 and $0 as of March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The total estimated grant date fair value of options vested during the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 was $33 and $0, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 is $1.38 per share or an aggregate grant date fair value of  $104. There were no options granted during the quarter ended March 31, 2014.
On January 1, 2015 the Company’s Board of Directors granted an option to acquire an aggregate of 75,000 shares under the 2014 Plan. The options vest on a monthly schedule over 48 months such that they are vested in full on the four-year anniversary of the grant date. As of March 31, 2015 there were 325,000 grants, no exercises and 18,750 cancelations of stock options under the 2014 Plan.
F-27

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Determining the Fair Value of Stock Options
The Company uses the Black-Scholes pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant. The fair value of the options granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the following assumptions for the periods presented:
Quarter ended March 31,
20152014
Expected term (in years)5
Risk-free interest rate1.61%
Expected volatility82.5%
Expected dividend rate0%
The assumptions are based on the following for each of the years presented:
Valuation Method — The Company estimates the fair value of its stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Expected Term — The Company estimates the expected term consistent with the simplified method identified by the SEC. The Company elected to use the simplified method because of its limited history of stock option exercise activity and its stock options meet the criteria of the “plain-vanilla” options as defined by the SEC. The simplified method calculates the expected term as the average of the vesting and contractual terms of the award.
Volatility — Because the Company has limited trading history by which to determine the volatility of its own common stock price, the expected volatility being used is derived from the historical stock volatilities of a representative industry peer group of comparable publicly listed companies over a period approximately equal to the expected term of the options.
Risk-free Interest Rate — The risk-free interest rate is based on median U.S. Treasury zero coupon issues with remaining terms similar to the expected term on the options.
Expected Dividend — The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends and does not plan to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future, and therefore, used an expected dividend yield of zero in the valuation model.
Forfeiture — The Company estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The Company uses historical data to estimate pre-vesting forfeitures and records stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. All stock-based payment awards are amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods. If the Company’s actual forfeiture rate is materially different from its estimate, the stock-based compensation expense could be significantly different from what the Company has recorded in the current period.
F-28

Semler Scientific, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The Company has recorded an expense of  $33 and $0 as it relates to stock-based compensation for the quarters ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which was allocated as follows based on the role and responsibility of the recipient in the Company:
Three months ended March 31,
20152014
Cost of Revenue$1$
Engineering and Product Development2
Sales and Marketing15
General and Administrative15
Total$33$
9.
Subsequent Events
On April 1, 2015, the Company issued and sold an aggregate of 143,000 shares of its common stock to an accredited investor, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement for an aggregate purchase price of  $500,500, which was paid in cash.
F-29

   
[MISSING IMAGE: lg_semlersci.jpg]
1,180,000 Shares
Common Stock
[MISSING IMAGE: t1300651_logo1.jpg]
UP TO              SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
PROSPECTUS
Aegis Capital CorpH.C. WAINWRIGHT & CO.
           , 2014
Until           , 2014 (25 days after the commencement of this offering) all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers’ obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.2015


PART II — INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ItemInformation Not Required in Prospectus
ITEM 13.   Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution.
The following table sets forth all expenses to be paid by the registrant, other than estimated underwriting discounts and commissions,placement agent fees, in connection with our public offering. All amounts shown are estimates except for the SEC registration fee the NASDAQ listing fee and the FINRA filing fee:
ItemAmount to be paid
SEC registration fee$1,264
FINRA filing fee2,000
Printing and engraving expenses*
Legal fees and expenses*
Accounting fees and expenses*
Blue Sky, qualification fees and expenses*
Transfer Agent fees and expenses*
Miscellaneous expenses*
Total$*
 
SEC registration fee
   1,750 
 
FINRA filing fee
   3,428 
 
NASDAQ listing fee
   50,000 
 
Blue sky qualification fees and expenses
   15,000 
 
Legal fees and expenses
   600,000 
 
Accounting fees and expenses
   580,000 
 
Transfer agent and registrar’s fees and expenses
   20,000 
 
Printing and engraving expenses
   70,000 
 
Miscellaneous expense
   70,000 
 
Total
  $1,410,178 
Item*
To be provided in amendment.
ITEM 14.   Indemnification of Directors and Officers.
Delaware General Corporation Law.Law.   The registrant is a Delaware corporation. Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) enables a corporation to eliminate or limit the personal liability of a director to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of the director’s fiduciary duty, except:

  • for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders;

  • for acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
���

  • pursuant to Section 174 of the DGCL (providing for liability of directors for unlawful payment of dividends or unlawful stock purchases or redemptions); or

  • for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
In accordance with Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL, the registrant’s certificate of incorporation includes a provision eliminating, to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL, the liability of the registrant’s directors to the registrant or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary as director. If the DGCL is subsequently amended to further eliminate or limit the liability of a director, then a director of the registrant, in addition to the circumstances in which a director is not personally liable as set forth in provision described in the preceding sentence, will not be liable to the fullest extent permitted by the amended DGCL.
Subsection (a) of Section 145 of the DGCL provides that a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal
II-1

action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. Section 145 of the DGCL further provides that a corporation similarly may indemnify any such person serving in any such capacity who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor, against expenses

(including (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and except that no indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the Delaware Court of Chancery or such other court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all of the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses that the Court of Chancery or such other court shall deem proper.
Certificate of Incorporation.Incorporation.   The registrant’s certificate of incorporation contains provisions that provide that the registrant will indemnify and hold harmless, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law as it presently exists or may hereafter be amended, any officer or director who was or is made or is threatened to be made a party or is otherwise involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or officer of the registrant or, while a director or officer of the registrant, is or was serving at the request of the registrant as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, trust, enterprise or nonprofit entity, including service with respect to employee benefit plans, against all liability and loss suffered and expenses (including attorneys’ fees) reasonably incurred by the director or officer. The registrant shall pay the expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by the director or officer in defending any proceeding in advance of its final disposition; provided, however, that, to the extent required by law, such payment of expenses in advance of the final disposition of the proceeding shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking by the director or officer to repay all amounts advanced if it should be ultimately determined that the director or officer is not entitled to be indemnified.
The DGCL provides that the indemnification described above shall not be deemed exclusive of any other indemnification that may be granted by a corporation pursuant to its by-laws, disinterested directors’ vote, stockholders’ vote, agreement or otherwise.
Insurance Policies.Policies.   The DGCL also provides corporations with the power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation in a similar capacity for another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against any liability asserted against him or her in any such capacity, or arising out of his or her status as such, whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify him or her against such liability as described above. The registrant has directors and officer’s liability insurance in an amount of  $3 million for loss plus an additional $1 million for associated costs, charges and expenses associated with the loss.
Indemnification Agreements.   We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and executive officers in furtherance of the indemnification provided in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws. These agreements are intended to indemnify our directors and executive officers to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers, or persons controlling the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, the registrant has been informed that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in such Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
ItemITEM 15.   Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.
During the last three years, we have issued unregistered securities to the persons as described below. None of these transactions involved any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, except as specified below, or any public offering, and the we believe that, except as set forth below, each transaction was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by virtue of Section 4(a)(2) thereof and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder, or under Section 3(a)(9). All recipients had adequate access, though their relationships with us, to information about us.
During 2011, we issued an aggregate of 169,447 shares of common stock for cash amounting to $725,000.
During 2012, we issued an aggregate of 27,778 shares of common stock associated with 20,834 warrants to buy common stock for cash amounting to $125,209.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we changed from an S Corporation to a C Corporation and in connection therewith, we entered into an exchange agreement (“Exchange Agreement”) with certain of the holders of our common stock and outstanding warrants to acquire our common stock, pursuant to which such holders exchanged their shares and warrants into and for shares of, and warrants to acquire, our newly created Series A Preferred Stock, Series A-1 Preferred Stock and/or Series A-2 Preferred Stock in amounts that were determined in such negotiations. Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, we exchanged 1,459,725 shares of our common stock and warrants to acquire 358,733 shares of our common stock into (A) 786,750 shares of common stock, (B) 129,225 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, (C) 293,750 shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and (D) 250,000 shares of Series A-2 Preferred Stock, and warrants to acquire an aggregate of 583,441 shares of our convertible preferred stock.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 807,067 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and warrants to acquire an aggregate of 702,398 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $3,633,453.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued an aggregate of 532,110 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock and warrants to acquire an aggregate of 298,241 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock for an aggregate gross purchase price of  $2,409,404.
The participants in the foregoing equity financingsfinancing included certain of our current Directors,and former directors, officers and holders of more than 5% of our capital stock or entities affiliated with them.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, we issued an aggregate of 50,000 shares of our common stock to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, is one of the co-trustees, for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000 in cash.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, we issued to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, is one of the co-trustees, (i) a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 44,445 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrant expires 5 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $444 in cash, and (ii) a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 20,844 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $4 per share, which warrant expires 5 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $208 in cash.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, we issued Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, MD, who later was appointed a Director and Chief Executive Officer, two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 20,834 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $4.00 per share, which warrants expire 12 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $208 in cash.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we issued an aggregate of 44,445 shares of our common stock to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, is one of the co-trustees, for an aggregate purchase price of $200,002 in cash.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we issued Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, MD, who later was appointed a Director and Chief Executive Officer, three warrants to purchase an aggregate of 16,390 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 12 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $164 in cash.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we issued Dr. Herbert J. Semler, our Chairman and co-founder, two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 57,640 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 12 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $58 in cash.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we issued to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, serves as a co-trustee, two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 92,188 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 10 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $92 in cash.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 27,778 shares of our common stock to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, is one of the co-trustees, for an aggregate purchase price of $125,001 in cash.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2012, we issued to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, is one of the co-trustees, a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 20,834 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrant expires 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $208 in cash.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2012, we issued Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, MD, who later was appointed a Director and Chief Executive Officer, a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 10,556 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrant expires 12 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $106 in cash.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, in accordance with the Exchange Agreement, Dr. Herbert J. Semler and Mrs. Shirley Semler were issued an aggregate of 786,750 shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 57,640 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock; the accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang is one of the co-trustees was issued an aggregate of 250,000 shares of our Series A-2 Preferred Stock, 81,250 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock, 72,223 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, warrants to buy an aggregate of 69,281 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and warrants to buy an aggregate of 173,612 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock; Mr. Eric Semler was issued an aggregate 125,000 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock, 7,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, warrants to buy an aggregate of 93,750 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock, and warrants to buy an aggregate of 5,250 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock; and Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, MD, was issued warrants to buy an aggregate of 25,000 shares of our Series A-2 Preferred Stock, warrants to buy an aggregate of 16,875 shares of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock and warrants to buy an aggregate of 38,907 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 234,446 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, is one of the co-trustees, for an aggregate purchase price of $1,055,007 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we issued to an accredited investor for which Mr. William H.C. Chang, who later was appointed a Director, is one of the co-trustees, three warrants to purchase an aggregate of 175,835 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $224 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 171,500 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to GPG SSF Investments, LLC, a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our capital stock, for an aggregate purchase price of $771,750 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we issued to GPG SSF Investments, LLC, a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our capital stock, two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 128,625 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $13 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we issued an aggregate of 166,668 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to Mr. Eric Semler, a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our capital stock and the son of our co-founders and Directors, Dr. and Mrs. Semler, for an aggregate purchase price of $750,006 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we issued to Mr. Eric Semler, a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our capital stock and the son of our co-founders and Directors, Dr. and Mrs. Semler, two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 125,001 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $838 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we issued Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, MD, who later was appointed a Director and Chief Executive Officer, two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 95,432 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 12 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of $10 in cash. In June 2013, these warrants were amended and now expire July 31, 2016.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued an aggregate of 111,112 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to an accredited investor for which a Directorformer director of our company and one of our principal stockholders, Mr. William H.C. Chang, is one of the co-trustees, for an aggregate purchase price of  $500,004 in cash.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued to an accredited investor for which a Directorformer director of our company and one of our principal stockholders, Mr. William H.C. Chang, is one of the co-trustees, a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 38,889 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of  $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of  $4 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued an aggregate of 116,667 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to two accredited investors for which Mr. Dinesh Gupta, who later was appointed a Director,former director, is a general partner or a trustee respectively, for an aggregate purchase price of  $525,001 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued to two accredited investors for which Mr. Dinesh Gupta, who later was appointed a Director,former director, is a general partner or a trustee respectively, two warrants to purchase an aggregate of 40,833 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of  $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of  $3,695 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued to Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, MD,M.D., our Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer and a Directordirector of our company, a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 60,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of  $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of  $6,000 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued an aggregate of 23,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock to Mr. Elliot Sainer, who later was appointed a Director,former director, for an aggregate purchase price of  $103,500 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued to Mr. Elliot A. Sainer, who later was appointed a Director,former director, a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 8,050 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of $4.50 per share, which warrants expirewarrant expires 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of  $1 in cash.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, we issued to Mr. Greg S. Garfield, who later was appointed a Director,director, a warrant to purchase an aggregate of 12,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock, at an exercise price of  $4.50 per share, which warrants expire 3 years from the issuance date, for an aggregate purchase price of  $1,200 in cash.
During the past three years, the following stock options were granted:
During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we granted two employeesOn February 24, 2015, a family trust of which William H.C. Chang, a former director and one consultant the option to purchaseof our principal stockholders, is a co-Trustee acquired an aggregate of 28,50055,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement pursuant to a stock purchase agreement with us dated February 24, 2015, at $4-4.50a price per share of  $4.52, the consolidated closing bid price on the date of the agreement. Such shares were acquired using personal funds (approximately $248,600).
On March 2, 2015, a family trust of which options expire 10 years from the grant date.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2011, we granted three employeesWilliam H.C. Chang, a former director and one consultant the option to purchaseof our principal stockholders, is a co-Trustee acquired an aggregate of 10,00062,500 shares of our common stock in a private placement pursuant to a stock purchase agreement with us dated March 2, 2015, at $4.50a price per share which options expire 10 years from the grant date.of  $4.10. Such shares were acquired using personal funds (approximately $250,000).
During the quarter ended March 31, 2012,On April 1, 2015, we granted two employees the option to purchaseissued and sold an aggregate of 26,500143,000 shares of our common stock at $4.50 per share, which options expire 10 years from the grant date.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, we modified all outstanding options to an accredited investor and significant stockholder, pursuant to a stock purchase shares of our common stock. Accordingly, as of such date, all outstanding options to purchaseagreement for an aggregate purchase price of  256,500 shares of our common stock are exercisable for $0.52 per share. We did not modify the expiration date of such options.
During the quarter ended December 31, 2012, we granted five employees and two consultants the option to purchase an aggregate of 78,000 shares of our common stock at $0.52 per share, which options expire 10 years from the grant date.
$500,500.

ItemITEM 16.   Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) ExhibitsExhibits..   The following exhibits are included herein or incorporated herein by reference.
Exhibit
Number
Description of Exhibit
1.1*DescriptionUnderwriting Agreement
3.13.1*Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Semler Scientific, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the RegistrantSecurities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
3.23.2*Bylaws of Semler Scientific, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the RegistrantSecurities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
4.14.1*Specimen Common Stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Form S-1/A Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 6, 2013).
4.24.2*Form of Investor Rights Agreement of Semler Scientific, Inc., dated June 7, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
5.1*Opinion of Reed Smith LLPLLP.
10.110.1*Form of Series A, Series A-1Common Stock Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Series A-2 Preferred Stock WarrantExchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
10.210.2*Form of Representative’s Warrant
10.3*2007 Key Person Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
10.310.4*2007 Key Person Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
10.4At-Will Employment, Confidential Information, Invention Assignment, and Arbitration Agreement between Semler Scientific, Inc. and Robert G. McRae, dated November 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
10.510.5*At-Will Employment, Confidential Information, Invention Assignment, and Arbitration Agreement between Semler Scientific, Inc. and Daniel E. Conger, dated October 18, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
10.610.6*At-Will Employment, Confidential Information, Invention Assignment, and Arbitration Agreement between Semler Scientific, Inc. and Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, M.D., dated November 11, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
10.710.7*Sales Representative Agreement between Semler Scientific, Inc. and Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, M.D. effective as of January 1, 20132013(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Amendment No. 1 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 6, 2013).
10.810.8*Service & Supply Agreement between Semler Scientific, Inc. and Phoenix DeVentures, Inc. dated as of April 28, 20112011(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 1 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 6, 2013).
10.914.1*2014 Stock Incentive Plan, dated August 26, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 ofCode of Business Conduct and Ethics
II-4

Exhibit
Number
Description
23.1**our Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 2, 2014).
10.10Form of Indemnification Agreement, approved and entered into between the Company and each of the Company’s directors and executive officers as of July 24, 2014 (incorporated by referenced to Exhibit 10.1 of our Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 29, 2014).
10.11Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement between Semler Scientific, Inc. and The Brenner Group, Inc., effective as of June 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1 of our Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 19, 2014).
10.12*Placement Agency Agreement, dated            , 2015 between Semler Scientific, Inc. and H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC.
10.13*Form of Placement Agent’s Warrant.
23.1Consent of BDO USA, LLP, independent registered public accounting firm.
23.2*Consent of Reed Smith LLP (See(included in Exhibit 5.1 above)5.1).
24.124.1*PowerPowers of Attorney (Included on(incorporated by reference to the signature page of this Registration Statement)hereto).
*
*To be filed by amendment.
  • Previously filed.
**
  • Filed herewith.
(b) Financial Statement SchedulesSchedules..   See page F-1.
ItemITEM 17.   Undertakings.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting agreement certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions described under Item 14 above, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

The undersigned Registrantregistrant hereby undertakes that:
(a) (1)
For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.
(b)
(2)
For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
.

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 5 to the Registration Statementregistration statement on Form S-1 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Portland, State of Oregon, on February the 818, 2014.th day of May, 2015.
SEMLER SCIENTIFIC, INC.
By:SEMLER SCIENTIFIC, INC.
By:
/s/ Douglas Murphy-Chutorian
Name:
Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, M.D.
Title:
Chief Executive Officer
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Douglas Murphy-Chutorian and or James M. Walker, and each of them, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to file and sign any and all amendments, including post-effective amendments and any registration statement for the same offering that is to be effective under Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act, to this registration statement, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney shall be governed by and construed with the laws of the State of Delaware and applicable federal securities laws.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this Amendment No. 5 to the Registration Statementregistration statement has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the datedates indicated.
SignatureTitleDate
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Douglas Murphy-Chutorian
Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, M.D.
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 18, 2014
May 8, 2015
/s/ Daniel E. Conger
James M. Walker
Daniel E. Conger
James M. Walker
Vice President FinanceChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
February 18, 2014
May 8, 2015
*
/s/ Herbert J. Semler
Herbert J. Semler, M.D.
Chairman of the Board of Directors
February 18, 2014
May 8, 2015
*
/s/ Bruce J Barclay
William H.C. Chang
Bruce J Barclay
Director
February 18, 2014
May 8, 2015
*
/s/ Aidan M. Collins
Aidan M. Collins
DirectorMay 8, 2015
/s/ Greg S. Garfield
Greg S. Garfield
Director
February 18, 2014
May 8, 2015
*
/s/ Arthur Leibowitz
Dinesh Gupta
Arthur Leibowitz, M.D., F.A.A.P.
Director
February 18, 2014
May 8, 2015
*
/s/ Wayne T. Pan
Elliot A. Sainer
Wayne T. Pan, M.D., Ph.D.
Director
February 18, 2014
May 8, 2015
*
/s/ Shirley L. Semler
Shirley L. Semler
Director
February 18, 2014
May 8, 2015
II-6

  • The undersigned does hereby sign this registration statement on behalf of the above indicated director of Semler Scientific, Inc. pursuant to a power of attorney executed by such director.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
Description
3.1Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Semler Scientific, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
3.2Bylaws of Semler Scientific, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
4.1Specimen Common Stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of our Form S-1/A Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 6, 2013).
4.2Form of Investor Rights Agreement of Semler Scientific, Inc., dated June 7, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
5.1*Opinion of Reed Smith LLP.
10.1Form of Common Stock Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
10.22007 Key Person Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
10.32007 Key Person Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
10.4At-Will Employment, Confidential Information, Invention Assignment, and Arbitration Agreement between Semler Scientific, Inc. and Robert G. McRae, dated November 1, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
10.5At-Will Employment, Confidential Information, Invention Assignment, and Arbitration Agreement between Semler Scientific, Inc. and Daniel E. Conger, dated October 18, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
10.6At-Will Employment, Confidential Information, Invention Assignment, and Arbitration Agreement between Semler Scientific, Inc. and Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, M.D., dated November 11, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement, as amended (File No. 333-192362), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2013).
10.7Sales Representative Agreement between Semler Scientific, Inc. and Douglas Murphy-Chutorian, M.D. effective as of January 1, 2013(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Amendment No. 1 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 6, 2013).
10.8Service & Supply Agreement between Semler Scientific, Inc. and Phoenix DeVentures, Inc. dated as of April 28, 2011(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 1 of our Form S-1 Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 6, 2013).

Exhibit
Number
By:Description/s/ Douglas Murphy-Chutorian      
10.92014 Stock Incentive Plan, dated August 26, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of our Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 2, 2014).Douglas Murphy-Chutorian M.D.
Attorney-in-Fact
10.10Form of Indemnification Agreement, approved and entered into between the Company and each of the Company’s directors and executive officers as of July 24, 2014 (incorporated by referenced to Exhibit 10.1 of our Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 29, 2014).
10.11Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement between Semler Scientific, Inc. and The Brenner Group, Inc., effective as of June 18, 2014 (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.1 of our Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 19, 2014).
10.12*Placement Agency Agreement, dated            , 2015 between Semler Scientific, Inc. and H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC.
10.13*Form of Placement Agent’s Warrant.
23.1Consent of BDO USA, LLP, independent registered public accounting firm.
23.2*Consent of Reed Smith LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
24.1Powers of Attorney (incorporated by reference to the signature page hereto).
*
To be filed by amendment.