1
     

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 2001 November 4, 2003

Registration No. 333-            ================================================================================


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON,

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM S-3

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER

Under

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933


INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER) DELAWARE 77-0416458 (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION (I.R.S. EMPLOYER OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NUMBER) 1340 W. MIDDLEFIELD ROAD MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA 94043

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware77-0416458
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

950 Kifer Road

Sunnyvale, California 94086

(408) 523-2100

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)


Lonnie M. Smith

President and Chief Executive Officer

Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

950 Kifer Road

Sunnyvale, California 94086

(408) 523-2100

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)


Copies to:

Alan C. Mendelson, Esq.

Latham & Watkins LLP

135 Commonwealth Drive

Menlo Park, California 94025

(650) 237-7000 (ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE, OF REGISTRANT'S PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) LONNIE M. SMITH PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. 1340 W. MIDDLEFIELD ROAD MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA 94043 (650) 237-7000 (NAME, ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE, OF AGENT FOR SERVICE) COPY TO: ALAN C. MENDELSON, ESQ. LATHAM & WATKINS 135 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025 (650) 463-4693 APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: As soon as practicable after the effective328-4600

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:    From time to time after this Registration Statement. Statement is declared effective.

If the only securities being registered on this Form are pursuant to dividend or interest reinvestment plans, please check the following box.    [ ] ¨

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, other than securities offered only in connection with dividend or interest reinvestment plans, check the following box.    [X] x

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    [ ] ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    [ ] ¨

If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box.    [ ] ¨

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE


Title of Each Class of

Securities to be Registered

  

Amount to be

Registered (1)(2)

  Proposed Maximum
Offering Price Per Share (3)
  Proposed Maximum
Aggregate Offering Price (3)
  

Amount of

Registration Fee


Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share

  724,729  $14.73  $10,675,259  $864

==================================================================================================================================== PROPOSED MAXIMUM PROPOSED MAXIMUM TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF AMOUNT TO BE OFFERING PRICE PER AGGREGATE OFFERING AMOUNT OF SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED REGISTERED SHARE(1) PRICE(1) REGISTRATION FEE - ----------------------------------------- ------------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- ------------------ Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share .................................. 200,000 $13.04 $2,608,000 $652.00 ====================================================================================================================================
(1)This registration statement shall also cover any additional shares of common stock which become issuable by reason of any stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization or other similar transaction effected without the receipt of consideration which results in an increase in the number of outstanding shares of our common stock.
(1)
(2)Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants assumed by Intuitive Surgical, Inc. in connection with its acquisition of Computer Motion, Inc.
(3)Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act. The calculation of the fee is based on $14.73, which was the average of the high and low sales prices of the common stock on the Nasdaq National Market on October 31, 2003.

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the purpose of computing the registration fee required byRegistrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 6(b)8(a) of the Securities Act or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and computedExchange Commission, acting pursuant to Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act based upon the average of the high and low prices of the Common Stock on July 11, 2001, as quoted on the Nasdaq National Market. It is not known how many shares will be purchased under this Registration Statement or at what price shares will be purchased. THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTIONsaid Section 8(a), MAY DETERMINE. ================================================================================ 2 may determine.



The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. The selling stockholderstockholders may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and the selling stockholder isstockholders are not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED JULY 16, 2001 November 4, 2003

PROSPECTUS 200,000 SHARES INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.

Up to 724,729 Shares

Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

COMMON STOCK --------------- These shares of common stock are being offered


This prospectus relates to the offer and sale from time to time by the selling stockholder identifiedstockholders named in this prospectus. The selling stockholder may sell its sharesprospectus of common stock in a number of different ways and at varying prices. We provide more information about how the selling stockholder may sell its shares in the section entitled "Plan of Distribution" beginning on page 4. We are not selling anyup to 724,729 shares of our common stock, under this prospectus andpar value $0.001 per share, issuable upon the exercise of warrants assumed by us in connection with our acquisition of Computer Motion, Inc. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of these shares. --------------- OUR COMMON STOCK IS QUOTED ON THE NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET UNDER THE SYMBOL "ISRG." ON JULY 11, 2001, THE LAST REPORTED SALE PRICE FOR OUR COMMON STOCK ON THE NASDAQ NATIONAL MARKET WAS $13.00 PER SHARE. --------------- INVESTING IN OUR COMMON STOCK INVOLVES RISKS. SEE "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 1. --------------- the shares, but we could receive up to approximately $14.9 million in proceeds from the exercise of the warrants prior to those sales, which proceeds would be used for general corporate purposes. Please see “Selling Stockholders” and “Plan of Distribution” for information about the selling stockholders and the manner of offering of the common stock.

Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “ISRG.” On November 3, 2003, the last reported sale price for our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market was $15.84 per share.

See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 5 to read about the risks you should consider before buying shares of our common stock.


Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined ifpassed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus is truthful or complete.prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.


The date of this prospectus is                     , 2001 3 2003.


TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Risk Factors...........................................................1 About Intuitive Surgical, Inc..........................................1 Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements......................2 Use of Proceeds........................................................2 Selling Stockholder....................................................3 Plan of Distribution...................................................4 Legal Matters..........................................................5 Experts................................................................5 Where You Can Find More Information....................................6 --------------- You should rely only on the

Page

Where You Can Find More Information

ii

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

iv

About Intuitive Surgical

1

Risk Factors

5

Use of Proceeds

16

Price Range of Common Stock

16

Selected Consolidated Financial Data

17

Description of Capital Stock

19

Selling Stockholders

20

Plan of Distribution

23

Legal Matters

24

Experts

24


We have not authorized any dealer, salesman or other person to give any information we have providedor to make any representation other than those contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus. Neither we nor the selling stockholder have authorized anyone to provide you with additionalYou must not rely upon any information or different information. The selling stockholder isrepresentation not makingcontained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of these securitiesany offer to buy common stock, nor does this prospectus constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of any offer to buy common stock in any jurisdiction where theto any person to whom it is unlawful to make such offer is not permitted.or solicitation in such jurisdiction. You should not assume that the information contained in this prospectus is accurate only as ofon any date subsequent to the date on the front of the document andthis prospectus or that any information we have incorporated by reference in this prospectus is accurate only as ofcorrect on any date subsequent to the date of the document incorporated by reference. Inreference, even though this prospectus unlessis delivered or common stock sold on a later date.

i


WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as the Commission or the SEC. You can inspect and copy these reports, proxy statements and other information at the public reference facility of the Commission, in Room 1024, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can also obtain copies of these materials from the public reference section of the Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. Please call the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. The Commission also maintains a web site atwww.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants such as Intuitive Surgical that file electronically with the Commission.

We have filed a registration statement and related exhibits with the Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Securities Act. The registration statement contains additional information about us and our common stock. You may inspect the registration statement and exhibits without charge at the office of the Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, and you may obtain copies from the Commission at prescribed rates.

The Commission allows us to “incorporate by reference” the information we file with it, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is an important part of this prospectus, and information that we file later with the Commission will automatically update, modify and supersede this information. The following documents, which Intuitive Surgical has filed with the Commission, are incorporated by reference into this prospectus:

Annual Report of Intuitive Surgical on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002;

Proxy Statement included in registration statement on Form S-4 for Intuitive Surgical’s annual meeting of stockholders held June 30, 2003;

Quarterly Report of Intuitive Surgical on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003;

Quarterly Report of Intuitive Surgical on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003;

Report of Intuitive Surgical on Form 8-K filed November 3, 2003;

Item 5 of Report of Intuitive Surgical on Form 8-K filed October 27, 2003;

Report of Intuitive Surgical on Form 8-K filed July 15, 2003;

Item 5 of Report of Intuitive Surgical on Form 8-K filed April 24, 2003;

Report of Intuitive Surgical on Form 8-K filed March 7, 2003;

Description of Intuitive Surgical’s common stock contained in our registration statement on Form 8-A dated May 26, 2000; and

All documents filed by us with the Commission pursuant to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, after the date of this prospectus and before the selling stockholders stop offering common stock under this prospectus (other than those portions of such documents described in paragraphs (i), (k), and (l) of Item 402 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Commission).

In addition, the following documents, which Computer Motion has filed with the Commission, are incorporated by reference into this prospectus:

Annual Report of Computer Motion on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002;

Quarterly Report of Computer Motion on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003;

ii


Report of Computer Motion on Form 8-K filed March 11, 2003;

Report of Computer Motion on Form 8-K filed February 24, 2003; and

Report of Computer Motion on Form 8-K filed February 7, 2003.

You may request a copy of these filings at no cost, by writing or telephoning us at the following address:

Investor Relations

Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

950 Kifer Road

Sunnyvale, California 94086

(408) 523-2100

iii


DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to our financial condition, results of operations, business strategies, operating efficiencies or synergies, competitive position, growth opportunities for existing products, plans and objectives of management, markets for our common stock and other matters. Statements in this prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference that are not historical facts are hereby identified as “forward-looking statements” for the purpose of the safe harbor provided by Section 21E of the Exchange Act and Section 27A of the Securities Act. These forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those relating to the future business prospects, revenues and income wherever they occur in this prospectus or the documents incorporated herein or therein by reference, are necessarily estimates reflecting the best judgment of our management and involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements should, therefore, be considered in light of various important factors, including those set forth in and incorporated by reference in this prospectus. In addition to the risk factors identified elsewhere, important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from estimates or projections contained in the forward-looking statements include but are not limited to the following:

timing and success of product development and market acceptance of developed products;

regulatory approvals, clearances and restrictions;

guidelines and recommendations in the health care and patient communities;

intellectual property positions and litigation;

competition in the medical device industry and in the specific markets of surgery in which Intuitive Surgical operates;

our ability to integrate the operations of Computer Motion with our operations, including the respective research and development operations, personnel, product lines and technology, and the rate at which the operations of the two companies are integrated;

our ability to achieve anticipated synergies and cost savings of our acquisition of Computer Motion and the rate at which these anticipated synergies and costs savings are achieved; and

unanticipated manufacturing disruptions, delays in regulatory approvals of new manufacturing facilities or the inability to meet demand for products.

Words such as “estimate,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this prospectus and the documents incorporated by reference. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this prospectus, or in the case of documents incorporated by reference, as of the date of those documents. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this prospectus or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law.

iv


ABOUT INTUITIVE SURGICAL

We encourage you to read carefully this entire prospectus. In addition, we encourage you to read the information incorporated by reference into this prospectus, which includes important information about our company that we have filed with the SEC. You may obtain the information incorporated by reference in this prospectus without charge by following the instructions in the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information.” Unless the context otherwise indicated, "Intuitiverequires, references in this prospectus to “Intuitive Surgical," "we," "us"” “Intuitive,” “we,” “ us,” and "our"“our” refer to Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Intuitive(TM)(R), da Vinci(TM), EndoWrist(TM), InSite(TM) and Navigator(TM) are trademarks of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. i 4 RISK FACTORS An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the risk factors contained in our most recent filing on Form 10-K and all other information contained in and incorporated by reference in this prospectus before making an investment decision. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not yet identified or that we think are immaterial may also materially harm our business, operating results and financial condition and could result in a complete loss of your investment. ABOUT INTUITIVE SURGICAL

Our Business

We design, manufacture and manufacturemarket theda Vinci Surgical System, an advanced surgical system that we believe represents a new generation of surgery -- the third generation. We believe that this new generation of surgery, which we callIntuitive surgery, is a revolutionary advance similar in scope to the previous two generations of surgery -- open surgery and minimally invasive surgery, or MIS. Ourda Vinci Surgical System consists of a surgeon'ssurgeon’s console, a patient-side cart, a high performance vision system and our proprietary “wristed” instruments. By placing computer-enhanced technology between the surgeon and patient, we believe that our system enables surgeons to perform better surgery in a manner never before experienced. Theda Vinci Surgical System seamlessly translates the surgeon'ssurgeon’s natural hand movements on instrument controls at a console into corresponding micro-movements of instruments positioned inside the patient through small puncture incisions, or ports. Ourda Vinci Surgical System is the only commercially available technology that can provideprovides the surgeon with the intuitive control, range of motion, fine tissue manipulation capability and 3-D visualization characteristic of open surgery, while simultaneously allowing the surgeon to work through the small ports of minimally invasive surgery. In March 1997, surgeons using an early prototype of our technology successfully performed Intuitive surgery on humans. Beginning in May 1998, surgeons using our technology successfully performed what we believe were the world's first computer-enhanced closed chest heart surgeries, including mitral valve repair, dissection of an internal mammary artery and grafting of a coronary artery. In early 2000, surgeons using our technology successfully completed what we believe was the world's first beating heart bypass procedure using only small ports. In July 2000, we received marketing clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the da Vinci Surgical System to assist in the control of Intuitive Surgical endoscopic instruments including: rigid endoscopes, blunt and sharp endoscopic dissectors, scissors, scalpels, forceps/pickups, needle holders, endoscopic retractors, stabilizers, electrocautery, and accessories during laparoscopic surgical procedures such as cholecystectomy or Nissen fundoplication. Additionally, we received clearance for a non-cardiac thoracoscopic surgery indication for the product in March 2001.MIS. As of December 31, 2000,September 30, 2003, we havehad sold 40 of our 192da Vinci Surgical Systems and we believe surgeons using our technology have successfully completed over a thousand surgerythousands of surgical procedures of various types. The first generation of surgery,types in major hospitals throughout the United States as well as in Europe and Asia.

Although open surgery remainsis still the predominant form of surgery, and is still used in almost every area of the body. However, the large incisions required for open surgery create significant trauma to the patient, resulting inoften contributing to long hospitalization and recovery times and high hospitalization costs, as well as significant pain and suffering. Over the past several decades, the second generation ofphysicians have made progress in reducing surgery-related trauma by developing MIS techniques. These techniques allow surgery MIS surgery, has reduced trauma to the patient by allowing some surgeries to be performed through small ports rather than large incisions, resulting in shorter recovery times fewer complications and reduced hospitalization costs. MIS surgery hastechniques have been widely adopted for certain surgical procedures, such as gall bladder removal, but it hashave not been widely adopted for most complex surgical procedures. We believe surgeons have been slow to adopt conventional MIS surgerytools and techniques for complex surgical procedures because they generally find thatdue to the limitations of conventional MIS, including “backward” instrument movements, restricted range of motion, magnified hand tremor, lack of precision, difficulty in performing fine tissue manipulations, such as dissectingexaggerated instrument movements and suturing, using these techniques are more difficult to learn and perform, and are less precise, than in open surgery. Intuitive surgerypoor visibility.

Our Solution

We believe that our technology overcomes many of the shortcomingslimitations of both open surgeryexisting MIS tools and MIS surgery. Surgeons operate while seated comfortably at a console viewing a bright and sharp 3-D image of the surgical field. This immersive visualization results in surgeons no longer feeling disconnected from the 5 surgical field and the instruments, as they do when using an endoscope in MIS surgery. While seated at the console, the surgeon manipulates instrument controls in a natural manner, just as he or she has been trained to do in open surgery. Our technology is designed to provide surgeons with a range of motiontechniques in the surgical field analogous to the motions of a human wrist, while filtering out the tremor inherent in every surgeon's hand. In designing our products, we have focused on making our technology as simple as possible to use. In our experience, based on over a thousand procedures, surgeons can learn to manipulate our instruments with only a short amount of training and can learn to perform Intuitive surgery with less training than is required for MIS surgery. Our products are designed to make a broad range of open surgical and MIS procedures suitable for Intuitive surgery. The da Vinci Surgical System is designed to allow surgeons to perform better surgery while providing patients with the benefits of MIS surgery. following ways:

Natural Instrument Movements. Our technology is designed to directly transform the surgeon’s natural hand movements outside the body into corresponding micro-movements inside the patient’s body. Our technology eliminates the “backward” instrument movements of conventional MIS.

EndoWrist Instruments Provide Natural Dexterity and Range of Motion. Our technology is designed to provide surgeons with a range of motion in the surgical field analogous to the motions of a human hand and wrist. Our proprietary instruments incorporate “wrist” joints that enable surgeons to reach behind tissues and suture with precision, just as they can in open surgery.

More Precise Movements and Reduced Tremor. With our technology, the surgeon can also use “motion scaling,” a feature that translates, for example, a three millimeter hand movement outside the patient’s body into a one millimeter instrument movement in the surgical field inside the patient’s body. Motion scaling is designed to allow greater precision than is normally achievable in both open surgery and MIS.

Immersive 3-D Visualization. Our vision system is designed to give surgeons the perception that their hands are immersed in the surgical field even though they are outside the patient’s body. We believe our vision system, which incorporates our proprietary technology that allows the surgeon to easily change, move, zoom and rotate his or her field of vision, provides a much brighter and sharper image than any other 3-D endoscope vision system.

Easy to Learn, Easy to Master. We have designed our products to make them as simple as possible to use, even though the underlying technology is inherently complex.

Multi-Specialty Surgical Platform. Theda Vinci Surgical System is designed to enable surgeons to perform surgery in virtually any part of the body.

We believe that these advantages give the patient the benefits of less traumatic MIS while restoring to the surgeon the range of motion and fine tissue control possible with open surgery, along with further enhancements such as tremor reduction, motion scaling and superior visualization.

Our Products

Our products include ourda Vinci Surgical System consisting of a surgeon’s console, a patient-side cart, a high performance vision system and a variety of “smart disposable”EndoWrist instruments that incorporate our flexible “wrist” joint technology. We recently introduced a fourth robotic arm and three-channel vision system, which are available as options on newda VinciSurgical Systems or as upgrades to existingda Vinci Surgical Systems. Our product revenues are generated primarily from the sale of ourda Vinci Surgical Systems and ourEndoWrist instruments, which include scissors, forceps, scalpels and a variety of other tools. OurEndoWrist instruments are resterilizable and reusable for a defined number of procedures. Theda VinciSurgical System will not allow anEndoWrist instrument to be used for more than its prescribed number of procedures to ensure that it performs up to its specifications. Accordingly, we expect to generate recurring revenues from sales of ourEndoWrist instruments to be used with our installed base ofda VinciSurgical Systems. We also expect that as we increase the installed base of ourda Vinci Surgical Systems and as the number of procedures performed with those installed systems also increases, recurring revenues from sales of ourEndoWrist instruments will account for an increasing percentage of our total revenues.

Our Strategy

Our goal is to establishIntuitive surgery as the standard for complex surgical procedures and many other procedures currently performed using either open surgery or MIS. We intend to accomplish this objective both by pioneering new types of endoscopic surgery and by making existing MIS procedures easier, safer and more cost effective. Over time, our strategy is to broaden the number of procedures performed using theda Vinci Surgical System and to educate surgeons and hospitals as to the benefits ofIntuitive surgery. Key elements of our strategy include the following:

Focus on Key Institutions.Our marketing efforts are focused on both academic and community hospitals in order to increase the prestige associated with use of theda Vinci Surgical System and drive system and procedure volume.

Focus on Key Procedures. Our procedure marketing efforts are primarily focused within urologic surgery, cardiothoracic surgery and general surgery.

Focus on Leading Surgeons to Drive Rapid and Broad Adoption.We place significant emphasis on marketing theda Vinci Surgical System to leading surgeons who are considered to be the “thought leaders” in their institutions and fields.

Develop Protocols for New Surgical Procedures.We intend to leverage our relationships with key institutions and surgical thought leaders to develop protocols for new surgical procedures.

Maintain Market Leadership.We intend to maintain our leadership advantage by continuing to develop and enhance our technology and to communicate the benefits of ourda Vinci Surgical System to surgeons, hospitals and patients.

Develop Industry Alliances.We intend to continue to establish strategic alliances with leading medical device companies. We have formed alliances with, among other companies, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Olympus Corporation and Medtronic, Inc.

Our Acquisition of Computer Motion

In June 2003, we acquired Computer Motion, Inc. in a stock transaction pursuant to which a wholly owned subsidiary of our company merged with and into Computer Motion. Computer Motion developed and marketed robotic and computerized surgical systems. In connection with the merger, each outstanding share of Computer Motion common stock was converted into the right to receive a fraction of one share of our common stock. In addition, we assumed all of Computer Motion’s outstanding options and warrants. The total purchase price was approximately $148.6 million. In connection with our acquisition of Computer Motion, all pending patent litigation between the companies was dismissed and Robert Duggan, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Computer Motion, and Eric Halvorson, a director of Computer Motion, were appointed to our board of directors.

Our acquisition of Computer Motion is intended to enhance the competitive position of the combined company and to enable us to drivebetter capitalize on the market opportunity for the application of robotics to MIS. In addition, the acquisition is intended to strengthen our workforce, to enable us to better focus on strategic products and customers and to achieve significant cost synergies and economies of scale. The acquisition also eliminated ongoing intellectual property litigation between the two companies.

Recent Developments

On October 27, 2003, we announced our financial results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003. We shipped 15da Vinci Surgical Systems and 16 fourth arms during the three months ended September 30, 2003. Sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 were $23.4 million and $64.1 million, respectively. Sales for the three months ended September 30, 2003 were comprised of $15.7 million from system sales and $7.7 million of recurring revenue. Operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 were $16.7 million and $43.4 million, respectively. Net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 was $3.4 million, or $0.12 per share, and $4.8 million, or $0.22 per share, respectively.

Effective July 1, 2003, we prospectively adopted EITF 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” Under EITF 00-21, a fundamental changeportion of the overall system price attributable to the first year of service is deferred and recognized as revenue over the course of the first year. Previously, in surgery.accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements,” we recognized this amount in the period the system was delivered and accepted and accrued the estimated costs of providing service in that same period. As a result of the adoption of EITF 00-21, we deferred $1.7 million of revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2003 for recognition in future quarters.

On October 31, 2003, we sold 5,000,000 shares of common stock in an underwritten public offering at a price of $14.50 per share. We were incorporatedestimate that our net proceeds from the offering will be approximately $67.7 million, after deducting the underwriting discount and the estimated offering expenses payable by us.


Our company was founded in Delaware in November 1995 as Intuitive Surgical Devices, Inc. and changed our name to Intuitive Surgical, Inc. in January 1997.1995. Our executive offices are located at 1340 W. Middlefield950 Kifer Road, Mountain View,Sunnyvale, California 94043, and94086, our telephone number is (650) 237-7000. Our(408) 523-2100 and our website address is located at http://www.intuitivesurgical.com.www.intuitivesurgical.com. Information contained on our website is not aincorporated by reference into and does not form any part of this prospectus. SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS SomeIntuitive®,da Vinci®, ZEUS®, AESOP®, HERMES®,EndoWrist®, InSite® and Navigator are trademarks of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. or its subsidiaries.

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the statementsother information included in this prospectus, including the documentsmatters addressed in “Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” You should carefully consider the following risks before purchasing our common stock. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that are not currently believed to be important to you also may adversely affect our company.

Our future operating results may be below securities analysts’ or investors’ expectations, which could cause our stock price to decline.

Because of our limited operating history, we have limited insight into trends that may emerge in our market and affect our business. The revenue and income potential of our market are unproven, and we may be unable to generate significant revenues. In addition, our costs may be higher than we, securities analysts or investors expect. If we fail to generate sufficient revenues or our costs are higher than we expect, our results of operations will suffer, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline. Further, future revenue from sales of our products is difficult to forecast because the market for new surgical technologies is still evolving. Our results of operations will depend upon numerous factors, including:

the extent to which our products gain market acceptance;

actions relating to regulatory matters;

our timing and ability to develop our manufacturing and sales and marketing capabilities;

demand for our products;

the progress of surgical training in the use of our products;

our ability to develop, introduce and market new or enhanced versions of our products on a timely basis;

product quality problems;

our ability to protect our proprietary rights and defend against third party challenges;

our ability to license additional intellectual property rights;

the integration of Computer Motion with our company;

the progress and results of clinical trials; and

third-party payor reimbursement policies.

Our operating results in any particular period will not be a reliable indication of our future performance. It is likely that in some future quarters, our operating results will be below the expectations of securities analysts or investors. If this occurs, the price of our common stock, and the value of your investment, will likely decline.

We experience long and variable sales cycles, which could have a negative impact on our results of operations for any given quarter.

Ourda Vinci Surgical System has a lengthy sales and purchase order cycle because it is a major capital item and generally requires the approval of senior management at purchasing institutions. These factors may contribute to substantial fluctuations in our quarterly operating results, particularly during the periods in which our sales volume is low. Because of these fluctuations, it is likely that in some future quarters our operating results will fall below the expectations of securities analysts or investors. If that happens, the market price of our stock would likely decrease. These fluctuations also mean that you will not be able to rely upon our operating results in any particular period as an indication of future performance.

Because a small number of customers have and are likely to continue to account for a substantial portion of our revenues, our revenues could decline due to the loss or delay of a single customer.

A relatively small number of customers account for a significant portion of our total revenues. During the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, approximately 70% and 80%, respectively, of our revenues came from the sales ofda Vinci Surgical Systems, which are high revenue dollar items. During the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, approximately 71% and 81%, respectively, of our revenues came from the sales ofda Vinci Surgical Systems. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, no customer accounted for more than 10% of total sales. However, due to the high average selling price of theda Vinci Surgical System, our failure to add new customers that make significant purchases of our products could reduce our future revenues. The loss or delay of individual orders could have a significant impact on revenues and operating results.

If our products do not achieve market acceptance, we will not be able to generate the revenue necessary to support our business.

Our products represent a fundamentally new way of performing surgery. Achieving physician, patient and third-party payor acceptance ofIntuitive surgery as a preferred method of performing surgery will be crucial to our success. If our products fail to achieve market acceptance, hospitals will not purchase our products and we will not be able to generate the revenue necessary to support our business. We believe that physicians’ and third-party payors’ acceptance of the benefits of procedures performed using our products will be essential for acceptance of our products by patients. Physicians will not recommend the use of our products unless we can demonstrate that they produce results comparable or superior to existing surgical techniques. Even if we can prove the effectiveness of our products through clinical trials, surgeons may elect not to use our products for any number of other reasons. For example, cardiologists may continue to recommend conventional open-heart surgery simply because such surgery is already widely accepted. In addition, surgeons may be slow to adopt our products because of the perceived liability risks arising from the use of new products and the uncertainty of reimbursement from third-party payors.

We expect that there will be a learning process involved for surgical teams to become proficient in the use of our products. Broad use of our products will require training of surgical teams. Market acceptance could be delayed by the time required to complete this training. We may not be able to rapidly train surgical teams in numbers sufficient to generate adequate demand for our products. We cannot be certain that our training programs will be cost effective or sufficient to meet our customers’ needs.

We are involved in intellectual property litigation with Brookhill-Wilk 1, LLC that may hurt our competitive position, may be costly to us and may prevent us from selling our products.

In September 2000 Brookhill-Wilk 1, LLC, or Wilk, filed a lawsuit against our company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 00 Civ. 6599 (NRB)) alleging that by making, using, selling or offering for sale ourda VinciSurgical System, we are infringing United States Patent Nos. 5,217,003 and 5,368,015 in willful disregard of Wilk’s patent rights. These patents concern methods and devices for “remote” surgery. In March 2001, Wilk withdrew its assertion of the ‘015 patent against our company. In November 2001, in response to a motion on one of Intuitive Surgical’s noninfringement defenses, the District Court granted summary judgment of noninfringement of the ‘003 patent in our favor and dismissed Wilk’s complaint in its entirety without prejudice. Wilk appealed the summary judgment ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In April 2003, the Court of Appeals reversed the District Court’s judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings. This reversal is based on the Court of Appeals’ determination that the particular claim limitation at issue should be interpreted differently than as construed by the District Court.

Upon remand, we intend to continue to vigorously defend our rights and, if necessary, are prepared to conduct discovery and file further motions on whether the patent is infringed, valid and/or enforceable. We believe that we incorporatehave multiple meritorious defenses to Wilk’s allegations. However, litigation is unpredictable and we may not prevail. Both parties have expressed a desire to engage in non-binding mediation before engaging in further proceedings in the District Court. The District Court has not yet set a schedule for further proceedings if mediation is unsuccessful.

In July 2003, Wilk filed a new lawsuit against three of our customers: Mt. Sinai Hospital, Lenox Hill Hospital and the New York and Presbyterian Hospital. Pursuant to agreements with those customers, we are defending the lawsuit on behalf of our customers. We do not expect this lawsuit to significantly impact the scope of the existing litigation with Wilk since any resolution of the existing Wilk litigation, whether on the merits or by reference, constitute forward-looking statements. These statements involve knownsettlement, will likely resolve this new lawsuit at the same time.

In September 2003, Wilk amended its complaint against our company to include Computer Motion within the lawsuit and unknown risks,to allege that Computer Motion’s Zeus product also infringes Wilk’s ‘003 patent. Prior to our acquisition of Computer Motion, Wilk sued Computer Motion but dismissed that lawsuit voluntarily in order to await the outcome of the appeal proceedings in Wilk’s litigation with our company. We believe that we have multiple meritorious defenses to Wilk’s allegations against Computer Motion, including many of the same defenses that apply to Wilk’s allegations against our company. However, litigation is unpredictable and we may not prevail. Wilk’s allegations against Computer Motion are directed only to Computer Motion products.

If we lose Wilk’s lawsuits against us and the three hospital customers, it will hurt our competitive position, may be costly to us and may prevent us from selling our products. If we lose the patent suit, we may need to obtain from Wilk a license to this technology if we are to continue to market our products that have been found to infringe Wilk’s patents. This license could be expensive, which could seriously harm our business. If Wilk is successful in its suit against us and is unwilling to grant us a license, we may be required to stop selling our products that are found to infringe Wilk’s patents unless we can redesign them so they do not infringe Wilk’s patents, which we may be unable to do. In addition, we could be required to pay Wilk damages, including treble damages, which could be substantial and harm our financial position. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, however, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of the Wilk litigation at this time and, therefore, cannot estimate the range of possible loss.

The foregoing proceeding could be expensive to litigate, may be protracted and our confidential information may be compromised. Whether or not we are successful in this lawsuit, the proceeding could consume substantial amounts of our financial and managerial resources. At any time, Wilk may file additional claims against our company, or we may file claims against Wilk, which could increase the risk, expense and duration of the litigations.

If we are unable to protect the intellectual property contained in our products from use by third parties, our ability to compete in the market will be harmed.

Our commercial success will depend in part on obtaining patent and other factorsintellectual property protection for the technologies contained in our products, and on successfully defending our patents and other intellectual property against third party challenges. We will incur substantial costs in obtaining patents and, if necessary, defending our proprietary rights. The patent positions of medical device companies, including ours, can be highly uncertain and involve complex and evolving legal and factual questions. We do not know whether we will obtain the patent protection we seek, or that the protection we do obtain will be found valid and enforceable if challenged. We also do not know whether we will be able to develop additional patentable proprietary technologies. If we fail to obtain adequate protection of our intellectual property, or if any protection we obtain is reduced or eliminated, others could use our intellectual property without compensating us, resulting in harm to our business. We may also determine that it is in our best interests to voluntarily challenge a third party’s products or patents in litigation or administrative proceedings, including patent interferences or reexaminations.

In addition, the laws of certain foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States.

Others may assert that our products infringe their intellectual property rights, which may cause us to engage in costly disputes and, if we are not successful in defending ourselves, could also cause us to pay substantial damages and prohibit us from selling our products.

We are aware of both United States and foreign patents issued to third parties that relate to computer-assisted surgery, remote surgery, and minimally invasive surgery. Some of these patents on their face appear broad enough to cover one or more aspects of our present technology, and may cover aspects of our future technology. We do not know whether any of these patents, if challenged, would be held valid, enforceable and infringed. From time to time, we receive, and likely will continue to receive, letters from third parties inviting us to license their patents. We may be sued by, or become involved in an administrative proceeding with, one or more of these third parties. We cannot assure you that a court or administrative body would agree with any arguments or defenses we have concerning invalidity, unenforceability or noninfringement of any third-party patent. In addition to the issued patents of which we are aware, other parties may have filed, and in the future are likely to file, patent applications covering surgical products that are similar or identical to ours. We cannot assure you that any patents issuing from applications filed by a third party will not cover our products or will not have priority over our patent applications.

The medical device industry has been characterized by extensive litigation and administrative proceedings regarding patents and other intellectual property rights, and companies have employed such actions to gain a competitive advantage. If third parties assert infringement or other intellectual property claims against us as Brookhill-Wilk 1, LLC has, our technical and management personnel will experience a significant diversion of time and effort and we will incur large expenses defending our company. If third parties in any patent action are successful, our patent portfolio may be damaged, we may have to pay substantial damages, including treble damages, and we may be required to stop selling our products or obtain a license which, if available at all, may require us to pay substantial royalties. We cannot be certain that we will have the financial resources or the substantive arguments to defend our patents from infringement or claims of invalidity or unenforceability, or to defend against allegations of infringement of third-party patents. In addition, any public announcements related to litigation or administrative proceedings initiated by us, or initiated or threatened against us, could cause our stock price to decline.

The rights and measures we rely on to protect the intellectual property underlying our products may not be adequate to prevent third parties from using our technology, which could harm our ability to compete in the market.

In addition to patents, we typically rely on a combination of trade secret, copyright and trademark laws, nondisclosure agreements and other contractual provisions and technical security measures to protect our intellectual property rights. Nevertheless, these measures may not be adequate to safeguard the technology underlying our products. If they do not protect our rights adequately, third parties could use our technology, and our ability to compete in the market would be reduced. In addition, employees, consultants and others who participate in developing our products may breach their agreements with us regarding our intellectual property, and we may not have adequate remedies for the breach. We also may not be able to effectively protect our intellectual property rights in some foreign countries. For a variety of reasons, we may decide not to file for patent, copyright or trademark protection outside the United States. We also realize that our trade secrets may become known through other means not currently foreseen by us. Notwithstanding our efforts to protect our intellectual property, our competitors may independently develop similar or alternative technologies or products that are equal or superior to our technology and products without infringing any of our intellectual property rights, or may design around our proprietary technologies.

Our products rely on licenses from third parties, and if we lose access to these technologies, our revenues could decline.

We rely on technology that we license from others, including technology that is integral to our products. We have entered into license agreements with SRI International, IBM Corporation, MIT, Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. and Heartport, Inc., now part of Johnson & Johnson. Any of these agreements may be terminated for breach. If any of these agreements is terminated, we may be unable to reacquire the necessary license on satisfactory terms, or at all. The loss or failure to maintain these licenses could prevent or delay further development or commercialization of our products.

Public announcements of litigation events may cause our stock price to decline.

During the course of our administrative proceedings and/or our industry'slawsuits, there may be public announcements of the results levels of activity,hearings, motions, and other interim proceedings or achievementsdevelopments in the litigation. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be materially differentnegative, it could have a substantial negative effect on the trading price of our stock.

Our products are subject to a lengthy and uncertain domestic regulatory process. If we do not obtain and maintain the necessary domestic regulatory approvals, we will not be able to market and sell our products in the United States.

Our products and operations are subject to extensive regulation in the United States by the United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA. The FDA regulates the research, testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage, recordkeeping, promotion, distribution and production of medical devices in the United States to ensure that medical products distributed domestically are safe and effective for their intended uses. In order for us to market certain products for use in the United States, we generally must first obtain clearance from the FDA pursuant to Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FFDCA. Clearance under Section 510(k) requires demonstration that a new device is substantially equivalent to another device with 510(k) clearance or grandfather status. If we significantly modify our products after they receive FDA clearance, the FDA may require us to submit a separate 510(k) or premarket approval application, or PMA, for the modified product before we are permitted to market the products in the United States. In addition, if we develop products in the future that are not considered to be substantially equivalent to a device with 510(k) clearance or grandfather status, we will be required to obtain FDA approval by submitting a PMA.

The FDA may not act favorably or quickly in its review of our 510(k) or PMA submissions, or we may encounter significant difficulties and costs in our efforts to obtain FDA clearance or approval, all of which could delay or preclude sale of new products in the United States. Furthermore, the FDA may request additional data or require us to conduct further testing, or compile more data, including clinical data and clinical studies, in support of a 510(k) submission. The FDA may also, instead of accepting a 510(k) submission, require us to submit a PMA, which is typically a much more complex and burdensome application than a 510(k). To support a PMA, the FDA would likely require that we conduct one or more clinical studies to demonstrate that the device is safe and effective. We may not be able to meet the requirements to obtain 510(k) clearance or PMA approval, or the FDA may not grant any necessary clearances or approvals. In addition, the FDA may place significant limitations upon the intended use of our products as a condition to a 510(k) clearance or PMA approval. Product applications can also be denied or withdrawn due to failure to comply with regulatory requirements or the occurrence of unforeseen problems following clearance or approval. Any delays or failure to obtain FDA clearance or approvals of new products we develop, any limitations imposed by the FDA on new product use, or the costs of obtaining FDA clearance or approvals could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In order to conduct a clinical investigation involving human subjects for the purpose of demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of a device, a company must, among other things, apply for and obtain Institutional

Review Board, or IRB, approval of the proposed investigation. In addition, if the clinical study involves a “significant risk” (as defined by the FDA) to human health, the sponsor of the investigation must also submit and obtain FDA approval of an investigational device exemption, or IDE application. Most of our products to date have been considered significant risk devices requiring IDE approval prior to investigational use. We may not be able to obtain FDA and/or IRB approval to undertake clinical trials in the United States for any new devices we intend to market in the United States in the future. If we obtain such approvals, we may not be able to comply with the IDE and other regulations governing clinical investigations or the data from any futuresuch trials may not support clearance or approval of the investigational device. Failure to obtain such approvals or to comply with such regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results levels of activityoperations.

Complying with FDA regulations is an expensive and time-consuming process, and our failure to comply fully could subject us to significant enforcement sanctions.

Because our products, including theda Vinci Surgical System, are commercially distributed, numerous postmarket regulatory requirements apply, including the following:

Quality System Regulation, or achievements expressedQSR, which requires manufacturers to follow elaborate design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures during the manufacturing process;

labeling regulations;

the FDA’s general prohibition against false or impliedmisleading statements in the labeling or promotion of products for unapproved or “off-label” uses;

the Reports of Corrections and Removals regulation, which requires that manufacturers report to the FDA recalls and field corrective actions taken to reduce a risk to health or to remedy a violation of the FFDCA that may pose a risk to health; and

the Medical Device Reporting regulation, which requires that manufacturers report to the FDA if their device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to recur.

We are subject to inspection and marketing surveillance by the FDA to determine our compliance with regulatory requirements. If the FDA finds that we have failed to comply, it can institute a wide variety of enforcement actions, ranging from a regulatory letter to a public warning letter to more severe civil and criminal sanctions. Our failure to comply with applicable requirements could lead to an enforcement action that may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We have modified the labeling, advertising and user training for theda Vinci Surgical System to call out specific procedures that we believe are within the scope of our existing 510(k) clearances. We cannot assure you that the FDA would agree that all such forward-looking statements. specific procedures are within the scope of the existing general clearance or that we have compiled adequate information to support the safety and efficacy of using theda Vinci Surgical System for all such specific procedures. We also have modified the hardware and software in theda Vinci Surgical System since clearance in ways that we believe do not require new 510(k) clearance. We cannot assure you that the FDA would agree with our determinations not to seek new 510(k) clearance for any of these changes. Computer Motion also modified the hardware and software in its products subsequent to 510(k) clearance without seeking new clearance. We cannot assure you that the FDA would agree with the determinations not to seek new 510(k) clearance for any of these changes. The FDA could impose enforcement sanctions and/or require us to obtain 510(k) clearance for any modification to our products or Computer Motion’s products. We may be prohibited from marketing the modified device until such 510(k) clearance is granted.

In some cases,December 2002, the FDA inspected our Sunnyvale manufacturing facility and issued a Form FDA 483 setting forth three observed compliance deficiencies relating to the QSR and two observed deficiencies relating

to the Reports of Corrections and Removals regulation. In January 2003, we wrote to the FDA indicating our response to each observation with proposed corrective actions. That same month, the FDA informed us that the adequacy of our promised corrections and actions would be verified during the next inspection of our facility. To date, the FDA has not returned for another inspection and we continue to evaluate and upgrade our QSR compliance. We cannot assure you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "intend," "expect," "plan," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "predict," "potential,"that, upon reinspection, the FDA will find that our promised corrective actions are appropriate or "continue," orthat they have been adequately implemented. We also cannot assure you that the negative of such terms orFDA will not find other comparable terminology. Althoughdeficiencies in our compliance with the QSR and other postmarket regulations.

We recently acquired Computer Motion and are working to integrate its FDA compliance system with our own. Our review is not complete, but we believe that the expectations reflectedComputer Motion likely has had deficiencies in QSR compliance, complaint handling, MDR reporting and Corrections and Removals reporting in the forward-looking statementslast several years that will require submission of retroactive reports to the FDA. We are reasonable,also reviewing whether Computer Motion responded to complaints with appropriate follow up. We cannot assure you that the FDA will not seek to impose enforcement sanctions on us for Computer Motion violations preceding our acquisition of Computer Motion, that the FDA will agree that since the acquisition we have corrected all regulatory problems, or that our review of Computer Motion’s complaint handling will not lead us to initiate recalls or field actions to remedy problems with Computer Motion products already in the field.

Our products are subject to various international regulatory processes and approval requirements. If we do not obtain and maintain the necessary international regulatory approvals, we will not be able to market and sell our products in foreign countries.

To be able to market and sell our products in other countries, we must obtain regulatory approvals and comply with the regulations of those countries. These regulations, including the requirements for approvals, and the time required for regulatory review vary from country to country. Obtaining and maintaining foreign regulatory approvals are expensive, and we cannot guaranteebe certain that we will receive regulatory approvals in any foreign country in which we plan to market our products. If we fail to obtain regulatory approval in any foreign country in which we plan to market our products, our ability to generate revenue will be harmed.

The European Union requires that manufacturers of medical products obtain the right to affix the CE mark to their products before selling them in member countries of the European Union. The CE mark is an international symbol of adherence to quality assurance standards and compliance with applicable European medical device directives. In order to obtain the right to affix the CE mark to products, a manufacturer must obtain certification that its processes meet certain European quality standards. In January 1999, we received permission to affix the CE mark to ourda Vinci Surgical System andEndoWrist instruments.

If we modify existing products or develop new products in the future, results, events, levelsincluding new instruments, we may need to apply for permission to affix the CE mark to those products. In addition, we will be subject to annual regulatory audits in order to maintain the CE mark permissions we have already obtained. We cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain permission to affix the CE mark for new or modified products or that we will continue to meet the quality and safety standards required to maintain the permissions we have already received. If we are unable to maintain permission to affix the CE mark to our products, we will no longer be able to sell our products in member countries of activity,the European Union.

If institutions or surgeons are unable to obtain reimbursement from third-party payors for procedures using our products, or if reimbursement is insufficient to cover the costs of purchasing our products, we may be unable to generate sufficient sales to support our business.

Domestic institutions will typically bill the services performed with our products to various third-party payors, such as Medicare, Medicaid and other government programs and private insurance plans. If hospitals do not obtain sufficient reimbursement from third-party payors for procedures performed with our products, or if government and private payors’ policies do not permit reimbursement for surgical procedures performed using

our products, we may not be able to generate the revenues necessary to support our business. Our success in international markets also depends upon the eligibility of our products for reimbursement through government-sponsored health care payment systems and third-party payors. Reimbursement practices vary significantly by country. Many international markets have government-managed healthcare systems that control reimbursement for new products and procedures. Other foreign markets have both private insurance systems and government-managed systems that control reimbursement for new products and procedures. Market acceptance of our products may depend on the availability and level of reimbursement in any country within a particular time. In addition, health care cost containment efforts similar to those we face in the United States are prevalent in many of the other countries in which we intend to sell our products and these efforts are expected to continue.

Because our markets are highly competitive, customers may choose to purchase our competitors’ products or may not accept Intuitive Surgery, which could result in reduced revenue and loss of market share.

Intuitive surgery is a new technology that must compete with established minimally invasive surgery and open surgery. These procedures are widely accepted in the medical community and in many cases have a long history of use. We also face competition from several companies that are developing new approaches and products for the minimally invasive surgery market. In addition, we may face competition from companies that develop robotic and computer-assisted surgical systems in the future. Our revenues may be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and market products that are more effective or less expensive than our products. If we are unable to compete successfully, our revenues will suffer. We may not be able to maintain or improve our competitive position against current or potential competitors, especially those with greater resources.

In many cases, the medical conditions that can be treated using our products can also be treated by drugs or other medical devices and procedures. Many of these alternative treatments are also widely accepted in the medical community and have a long history of use. In addition, technological advances could make such treatments more effective or less expensive than using our products, which could render our products obsolete or unmarketable. We cannot be certain that physicians will use our products to replace or supplement established treatments or that our products will be competitive with current or future technologies.

If defects are discovered in our products, we may incur additional unforeseen costs, hospitals may not purchase our products and our reputation may suffer.

Our products incorporate mechanical parts and computer software, either of which can contain errors or failures, especially when first introduced. In addition, new products or enhancements may contain undetected errors or performance problems that, despite testing, are discovered only after commercial shipment. Because our products are designed to be used to perform complex surgical procedures, we expect that our customers will have an increased sensitivity to such defects. We cannot assure you that our products will not experience errors or achievements. Except asperformance problems in the future. If we experience flaws or performance problems, any of the following could occur:

delays in product shipments;

loss of revenue;

delay in market acceptance;

diversion of our resources;

damage to our reputation;

increased service or warranty costs; or

product liability claims.

We have limited experience in manufacturing our products and may encounter manufacturing problems or delays that could result in lost revenue.

We have manufactured a limited number of our products for sales to customers. We may be unable to establish or maintain reliable, high-volume manufacturing capacity. Even if this capacity can be established and maintained, the cost of doing so may increase the cost of our products and reduce our ability to compete. We may encounter difficulties in scaling up production of our products, including:

problems involving production yields;

quality control and assurance;

component supply shortages;

shortages of qualified personnel; and

compliance with state, federal and foreign regulations.

Manufacturing our products is a complex process. If demand for our products exceeds our manufacturing capacity, we could develop a substantial backlog of customer orders. If we are unable to establish and maintain larger-scale manufacturing capabilities, our ability to generate revenues will be limited and our reputation in the marketplace would be damaged.

If our manufacturing facilities do not continue to meet federal, state or European manufacturing standards, we may be required to temporarily cease all or part of our manufacturing operations, which could result in product delivery delays and lost revenue.

Our manufacturing facilities are subject to periodic inspection by law,regulatory authorities, and our operations will continue to be regulated by the FDA for compliance with Good Manufacturing Practice requirements contained in the FDA’s Quality System Regulations, or QSR. We are also required to comply with International Organization for Standardization, or ISO, quality system standards in order to produce products for sale in Europe. If we undertake no obligationfail to publicly updatecontinue to comply with Good Manufacturing Practice requirements or ISO standards, we may be required to cease all or part of our operations until we comply with these regulations. We are currently in compliance with ISO standards. The FDA inspected our Mountain View and Sunnyvale facilities in March 2000 and December 2002, respectively. The Good Manufacturing Practice issues raised by the FDA during the inspections either were satisfactorily resolved with the FDA or we believe can be resolved by us to the FDA’s satisfaction, although we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so. We continue to be subject to FDA inspections at any forward-lookingtime. Maintaining such compliance is difficult and costly. We cannot be certain that our facilities will be found to comply with Good Manufacturing Practice requirements or ISO standards in future inspections and audits by regulatory authorities.

The FDA inspected the Goleta facilities of Computer Motion in 1998 and noted deficiencies in Computer Motion’s systems for reviewing and reporting product-related complaints and defect information. We have determined that these deficiencies may not have been addressed. While the Goleta manufacturing facility has been closed and production of certain products has been transferred to our Sunnyvale facility, these issues raised by the FDA must nonetheless be resolved. We are presently addressing the situation to resolve all the issues to our own and the FDA’s satisfaction, although we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so, nor can we assess what regulatory impact, if any, this may have on our company.

The state of California also requires that we maintain a license to manufacture medical devices. Our facilities and manufacturing processes were inspected in February 1998. In March 1998, we passed the inspection and received a device manufacturing license from the California Department of Health Services. In March 2002, our facilities and manufacturing processes in our Sunnyvale facility were re-inspected by the Food and Drug Branch, or FDB, and we were issued an updated device manufacturing license for our Sunnyvale facility. We are

subject to periodic inspections by the California Department of Health Services and, if we are unable to maintain this license following any future inspections, we will be unable to manufacture or ship any products.

Our reliance on sole and single source suppliers could harm our ability to meet demand for our products in a timely manner or within budget.

Some of the components necessary for the assembly of our products are currently provided to us by sole source suppliers or single source suppliers. We purchase components through purchase orders rather than long-term supply agreements and generally do not maintain large volumes of inventory. The disruption or termination of the supply of components could cause a significant increase in the costs of these components, which could affect our profitability. A disruption or termination in the supply of components could also result in our inability to meet demand for our products, which could harm our ability to generate revenues, lead to customer dissatisfaction and damage our reputation. Furthermore, if we are required to change the manufacturer of a key component of our products, we may be required to verify that the new manufacturer maintains facilities and procedures that comply with quality standards and with all applicable regulations and guidelines. The delays associated with the verification of a new manufacturer could delay our ability to manufacture our products in a timely manner or within budget.

The use of our products could result in product liability claims that could be expensive, divert management’s attention and harm our business.

Our business exposes us to significant risks of product liability claims. The medical device industry has historically been litigious, and we would face financial exposure to product liability claims if the use of our products were to cause injury or death. There is also the possibility that defects in the design or manufacture of our products might necessitate a product recall. Although we maintain product liability insurance, the coverage limits of these policies may not be adequate to cover future claims. Particularly as sales of our products increase, we may be unable to maintain product liability insurance in the future at satisfactory rates or in adequate amounts. A product liability claim, regardless of its merit or eventual outcome, could result in significant legal defense costs. A product liability claim or any product recalls could also harm our reputation or result in a decline in revenues.

During the second quarter 2003, two former patients of The Valley Hospital in New Jersey filed suit against The Valley Hospital, their surgeons and our company alleging various harms caused during their surgeries. We were named because theda Vinci Surgical System was utilized for a portion of the surgeries and the detachable tip of anEndoWrist instrument is alleged to have remained in each patient after each surgery. Each suit alleges, among others, negligence, carelessness and/or recklessness by each defendant, that theda Vinci Surgical System was defectively designed and manufactured, that we failed to properly instruct and train the surgeon in its use, and that the defendants failed to properly apprise the patients of the risks involved. Each suit seeks an unspecified amount of general, special and punitive damages from the defendants, in addition to a request to recover the costs of suit and attorney fees. As each suit was just recently filed, both are in very early stages and discovery has recently commenced.

If we lose our key personnel or are unable to attract and retain additional personnel, our ability to compete will be harmed.

We are highly dependent on the principal members of our management and scientific staff. Our product development plans depend, in part, on our ability to attract and retain engineers with experience in mechanics, software and optics. Attracting and retaining qualified personnel will be critical to our success, and competition for qualified personnel is intense. We may not be able to attract and retain personnel on acceptable terms given the competition for such personnel among technology and healthcare companies, and universities. The loss of any of these persons or our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel could harm our business and our ability to compete.

International sales of our products account for a significant portion of our revenues, which exposes us to risks inherent in international operations. Our growth may be limited if we are unable to successfully manage our international activities.

Our business currently depends in large part on our activities in Europe and other foreign markets. Sales to markets outside of the United States accounted for approximately 30% of our sales for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 20% for the three months ended June 30, 2002. Sales to markets outside of the United States accounted for approximately 24% of our sales for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 17% for the six months ended June 30, 2002. For 2002, 2001 and 2000, sales to markets outside the United States accounted for approximately 18%, 34% and 39%, respectively, of our net sales.

We are subject to a number of challenges that specifically relate to our international business activities. These challenges include:

failure of local laws to provide the same degree of protection against infringement of our intellectual property;

protectionist laws and business practices that favor local competitors, which could slow our growth in international markets;

the risks associated with foreign currency exchange rate fluctuation;

the expense of establishing facilities and operations in new foreign markets; and

building an organization capable of supporting geographically dispersed operations.

Currently, a majority of our international sales are denominated in United States dollars. As a result, an increase in the value of the United States dollar relative to foreign currencies could make our products less competitive in international markets. If we are unable to meet and overcome these challenges, our international operations may not be successful, which would limit the growth of our business.

Termination of relationships with former distributors of Computer Motion could result in litigation.

Our integration strategy related to our acquisition of Computer Motion provides that we terminate Computer Motion’s relationships with a number of companies that served as Computer Motion’s distributors prior to the acquisition. Several of these former distributors have informed us that they believe that they are entitled to compensation in connection with such termination. We may be unable to resolve these claims without litigation. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such litigation at this time and, therefore, cannot estimate the range of possible loss. If we sue or are sued by any of Computer Motion’s former distributors, these proceedings could be expensive to litigate, may be protracted and Computer Motion’s confidential information may be compromised. Whether or not we are successful in these lawsuits, these proceedings could consume substantial amounts of our financial and managerial resources.

The conviction of Arthur Andersen LLP on obstruction of justice charges may adversely affect Arthur Andersen’s ability to satisfy claims arising from the provision of auditing services to Computer Motion.

Arthur Andersen LLP audited Computer Motion’s financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000. On March 14, 2002, an indictment was unsealed charging Arthur Andersen with federal obstruction of justice arising from the government’s investigation of Enron Corp. On June 15, 2002, Arthur Andersen was convicted of these charges. The impact of this conviction on Arthur Andersen’s financial condition may adversely affect the ability of Arthur Andersen to satisfy any reason, even if new information becomes available in the future. claims arising from its provision of auditing services to Computer Motion.

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any of the proceeds from the saleselling stockholders’ sales of our common stock. We could receive up to approximately $14.9 million in proceeds from the exercise of the warrants by the selling stockholders, which proceeds would be used for general corporate purposes.

PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK

Our common stock has been traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol “ISRG” since June 13, 2000. The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices of our common stock for the periods indicated and are as reported by Nasdaq.

Quarter


  High

  Low

Year Ended December 31, 2003

        

First Quarter

  $13.50  $7.52

Second Quarter

   18.20   10.96

Third Quarter

   18.08   12.08

Fourth Quarter (through November 3, 2003)

   17.89   14.50

Year Ended December 31, 2002

        

First Quarter

  $20.30  $16.78

Second Quarter

   21.80   15.84

Third Quarter

   16.62   11.54

Fourth Quarter

   16.26   12.16

Year Ended December 31, 2001

        

First Quarter

  $18.13  $9.75

Second Quarter

   27.02   6.70

Third Quarter

   27.90   10.78

Fourth Quarter

   20.30   12.90

As of October 1, 2003, there were approximately 553 stockholders of record of our common stock, although we believe that there is a significantly larger number of beneficial owners of our common stock.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The tables below present our selected consolidated statements of operations and balance sheet data. We derived the selected consolidated financial data from our audited financial statements for the three years ended December 31, 2002. We derived the selected consolidated financial data for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statement data includes, in our opinion, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2003 or any other future period. On June 30, 2003, we completed our acquisition of Computer Motion. The operations of Computer Motion have been excluded from the unaudited consolidated statement of operations data for the six months ended June 30, 2003, as the acquisition was not completed until June 30, 2003. The balance sheet of Computer Motion has been included in the unaudited consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2003. You should read this information together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in our annual and quarterly reports and other information that we have filed with the SEC and incorporated by reference in this prospectus. Please see “Where You Can Find More Information.”

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

  ��Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

  Six Months Ended
June 30,


 
   2002

  2001

  2000

  1999

  1998

  2003

  2002

 
                  (Unaudited) 

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

                             

Sales

  $72,022  $51,673  $26,624  $10,192  $—    $40,688  $33,796 

Cost of sales

   34,584   28,218   18,031   9,273   —     16,644   16,732 
   


 


 


 


 


 


 


Gross profit

   37,438   23,455   8,593   919   —     24,044   17,064 

Operating costs and expenses:

                             

Selling, general and administrative

   40,864   29,987   19,136   9,338   7,565   19,598   18,569 

Research and development

   16,793   13,851   11,734   11,130   23,208   7,050   8,877 
   


 


 


 


 


 


 


Total operating costs and expenses

   57,657   43,838   30,870   20,468   30,773   26,648   27,446 
   


 


 


 


 


 


 


Loss from operations

   (20,219)  (20,383)  (22,277)  (19,549)  (30,773)  (2,604)  (10,382)

Interest income, net

   1,841   3,641   3,862   1,134   1,330   1,194   1,168 

Other income (expense)

   (43)  42   (108)  —     —     (5)  (143)
   


 


 


 


 


 


 


Net loss

  $(18,421) $(16,700) $(18,523) $(18,415) $(29,443) $(1,415) $(9,357)
   


 


 


 


 


 


 


Basic and diluted net loss per common share

  $(1.01) $(0.93) $(1.56) $(7.61) $(16.27) $(0.08) $(0.51)
   


 


 


 


 


 


 


Shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per common share

   18,229   17,908   11,898   2,419   1,810   18,506   18,173 

   As of December 31,

  As of
June 30,
2003


 
   2002

  2001

  2000

  1999

  1998

  
                  (Unaudited) 

Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:

                         

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

  $50,839  $66,661  $89,441  $26,260  $23,220  $42,850 

Working capital

   52,562   67,922   83,836   22,023   19,817   41,557 

Total assets

   91,581   100,361   112,421   34,455   28,167   245,483 

Notes payable, less current portion

   1,838   771   1,861   2,521   2,438   1,235 

Deferred compensation

   (223)  (886)  (2,483)  (943)  (1,128)  (434)

Accumulated deficit

   (128,791)  (110,370)  (93,670)  (75,147)  (56,732)  (130,206)

Total stockholders’ equity

   63,680   78,293   90,730   22,211   20,596   204,576 

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

Holders of common stock are entitled to receive such dividends, if any, as may from time to time be declared by our Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor. Pursuant to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters on which the holders of common stock are entitled to vote and do not have cumulative voting rights. Holders of common stock have no preemptive, conversion, redemption or sinking fund rights. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of our company, holders of common stock are entitled to share equally and ratably in the assets of our company, if any, remaining after the payment of all debts and liabilities of our company and the liquidation preference of any outstanding preferred stock. The outstanding shares of common stock are, and the shares of common stock offered byhereby when issued will be, fully paid and nonassessable. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of common stock are subject to any series of preferred stock which we may issue in the selling stockholder. 2 6 SELLING STOCKHOLDER On April 26, 2000, we issued a warrant to purchasefuture.

Our Board of Directors may issue up to 200,0002,500,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and, subject to the provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, may fix the dividend rights, dividend rate, conversion rights, voting rights, rights and terms of redemption (including sinking fund provisions, if any), the redemption price or prices, the liquidation preferences, any other designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof and the number of shares constituting any series and the designation thereof. In addition, our Board of Directors may increase or decrease the number of shares of any series subsequent to the issue of shares of that series, but not below the number of shares of such series then outstanding. Our Board of Directors has the power to issue our preferred stock with voting and conversion rights that could negatively affect the voting or other rights of our common stockholders, and our Board of Directors could take that action without stockholder approval. The issuance of our preferred stock could delay or prevent a change of control in our company.

SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

In connection with the completion of our acquisition of Computer Motion, Inc. on June 30, 2003, we assumed warrants previously issued by Computer Motion, which warrants became exercisable for shares of our common stock in a private transactionconnection with that transaction. Pursuant to the selling stockholder, Heartport, Inc., at anregistration statement of which this prospectus is a part, we are registering the resale of up to 724,729 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise price of $3.00 per share. On June 22, 2001specified warrants.

We have filed with the selling stockholder exercisedCommission, under the warrant. In connection with this issuance, we agreed to fileSecurities Act, a registration statement on Form S-3, of which this prospectus forms a part, with the SEC coveringrespect to the resale of the shares issuedissuable upon exercise of the warrants from time to time on the Nasdaq National Market, in privately-negotiated transactions, or otherwise. We intend to prepare and file such amendments and supplements to the selling stockholder. registration statement as may be necessary to keep the registration statement effective until all shares covered by the registration statement have been sold or may be resold in a 90-day period under Rule 144 of the Securities Act without volume limitation or reliance on Rule 144(k).

The following table sets forth the name of theeach selling stockholder, the number of shares of our common stock that itknown by us to be beneficially ownsowned by each selling stockholder as of June 30, 2001October 1, 2003, the number of shares of our common stock that may be offered for resale for the account of each selling stockholder pursuant to this prospectus and the number of shares which mayof our common stock to be offered pursuant toheld by each selling stockholder after the sale of all of the shares covered by this prospectus. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.prospectus by that selling stockholder. Percentage ownership is based on 35,871,07527,149,306 shares of common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2001.October 1, 2003. The selling stockholder has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown as beneficially owned by it. The selling stockholderstockholders may sell all, some or none of the common stock being offered. We are unawareThis information is based upon our review of any material relationship betweenpublic filings, our stockholder and optionholder registers and information furnished by certain of the selling stockholder and us in the past three years other than as a result of the ownership of the shares of our common stock. stockholders.

Name of Selling Stockholder


  Shares Beneficially
Owned Prior to
the Offering (1)


  Shares Offered
by This
Prospectus


  Shares Beneficially
Owned Subsequent
to the Offering (1)(2)


  Shares

  Percent

    Shares

  Percent

Harold Wayne Andrews Jr.

  1,833  *  1,333  500  *

Brian and Renee Arington

  32  *  16  16  *

Marita Arington

  500  *  500  0  *

Michael Arington, as custodian for Alyssa Arington

  32  *  16  16  *

Richard and Marita Arington

  1,166  *  1,166  0  *

Shanna Assiter

  316  *  316  0  *

Matthew Balk

  10,085  *  10,085  0  *

Stephen Barrett

  6,405  *  2,692  3,713  *

Baystar

  14,311  *  14,311  0  *

Bedford Oak Partners, L.P.

  12,856  *  12,856  0  *

Christopher A. Ben

  332  *  166  166  *

Mike S. Ben

  166  *  166  0  *

Jeffrey C. Bermant

  1,667  *  1,667  0  *

Laura Burnam Braswell and Ann Bennett Braswell

  833  *  833  0  *

Mark Alan Buntz

  833  *  833  0  *

California Central Trust Bank TTEE Craig Carlson #1050184743

  270  *  270  0  *

California Central Trust Bank TTEE Lawrence Cohn #1050184761

  270  *  270  0  *

California Central Trust Bank TTEE Bruce Feuchter #1050184789

  148  *  148  0  *

California Central Trust Bank TTEE Ben Frydman #1050184798

  270  *  270  0  *

California Central Trust Bank TTEE John Ireland #1050184565

  83  *  83  0  *

California Central Trust Bank TTEE John Murphy #1050184912

  148  *  148  0  *

California Central Trust Bank TTEE William R. Rauth #1050185387

  270  *  270  0  *

California Central Trust Bank TTEE K.C. Schaaf #1050184958

  148  *  148  0  *

California Central Trust Bank TTEE Bruce Stuart #1050184994

  270  *  270  0  *

California Central Trust Bank TTEE Robert Whalen #1050185029

  270  *  270  0  *

California Central Trust Bank TTEE Nick E. Yocca #105018047

  270  *  270  0  *

Peter A. Cannon

  500  *  500  0  *

Castle Creek Healthcare Partners LLC

  12,545  *  12,545  0  *

CC Life Sciences, Ltd.

  25,087  *  25,087  0  *

Name of Selling Stockholder


  Shares Beneficially
Owned Prior to
the Offering (1)


 Shares Offered
by This
Prospectus


  Shares Beneficially
Owned Subsequent
to the Offering (1)(2)


  Shares

  Percent

   Shares

  Percent

CD Capital Management, LLC

  2,571  * 2,571  0  *

Michael Chan

  1,667  * 1,667  0  *

Greg J. Chavarria

  1,166  * 1,166  0  *

Bradley and Kathleen Chewakin

  106  * 106  0  *

Kathleen Chewakin, as custodian for Eric Lee Chewakin

  32  * 32  0  *

Clarion Capital Corporation

  15,679  * 15,679  0  *

Clarion Offshore Fund Ltd.

  7,839  * 7,839  0  *

Clarion Partners L.P.

  7,839  * 7,839  0  *

Cleveland Overseas Ltd.

  31,357  * 31,357  0  *

Community Investment Partners II, L.P.

  5,839  * 4,167  1,672  *

Cranshire Capital, L.P.

  31,499  * 31,499  0  *

Daniel R. and Pamela G. Doiron, as joint tenants

  11,232  * 7,565  3,667  *

Doiron Family Trust

  3,733  * 733  3,000  *

Paul R. and Peggy Doiron

  5,334  * 1,667  3,667  *

Frederick Charles Dorr and Emily Jean Hass Revocable Trust

  1,667  * 1,667  0  *

Turtle Dorr Trust #2

  2,316  * 2,316  0  *

Robert Duggan (3)

  1,082,096  4.0% 63,014  1,019,082  3.7%

Caren L. Dunne

  1,166  * 1,166  0  *

James D. Dunne

  3,334  * 1,667  1,667  *

Donald and Diana Evans

  332  * 166  166  *

Ken Flood

  73,790  * 42,936  30,854  *

Paul F. Glenn Revocable Trust

  5,167  * 1,833  3,334  *

Ralph Goodson

  4,114  * 4,114  0  *

Ron Goodson

  4,114  * 4,114  0  *

Gryphon Master Fund, L.P.

  7,842  * 7,842  0  *

H.C. Wainwright & Co., Inc.

  3,673  * 3,673  0  *

Cecil Heftel

  13,336  * 6,668  6,668  *

Richard Heftel Living Trust dated Jan 9, 1996

  3,334  * 3,334  0  *

Jeff Henley

  21,559  * 7,156  14,403  *

Thomas R. Hower

  1,250  * 1,250  0  *

Robert Hussey

  928  * 928  0  *

Joseph P. Ilvento, MD., Judy C. Dean, MD., Inc. Money Purchase Pension Plan

  2,316  * 2,316  0  *

Jordan M. Laby & Sandra Laby Trustees of the Laby Family Trust
Dated November 10, 1997

  3,334  * 3,334  0  *

Todd Mitchell Laby

  2,567  * 333  2,234  *

Bryan A. Lamey

  1,366  * 1,366  0  *

George S Mauerman

  2,083  * 2,083  0  *

George S. Mauerman, Trustee for Adrien M. Mauerman Testamentary Trust

  3,750  * 3,750  0  *

Frank Louis Mitchell

  833  * 833  0  *

MRT, L.P.

  15,679  * 15,679  0  *

Pei Jin Ruan

  1,928  * 1,928  0  *

Pequot Navigator Offshore Fund, Inc.

  12,535  * 12,535  0  *

Pequot Scout Fund, LP

  25,070  * 25,070  0  *

Roberto J. and Danna Perez

  333  * 333  0  *

Knowland James Plucknett Revocable Trust, Knowland James Plucknett Trustee

  6,668  * 6,668  0  *

Quantico Partners L.P.

  7,839  * 7,839  0  *

Radyr Investments Limited

  7,843  * 7,843  0  *

Redpoint Partners L.P.

  20,382  * 20,382  0  *

Redwood Partners LLC

  9,385  * 9,385  0  *

RGRJ Venture Fund II LLC

  15,138  * 6,715  8,423  *

Jeff Barbaro and Brenda Gail Sanders

  463  * 463  0  *

SDS Merchant Fund L.P.

  514,536  1.9 23,527  491,009  1.8

SF Capital Partners Ltd.

  70,341  * 47,042  23,299  *

Eric Singer

  928  * 928  0  *

Reed Slatkin

  8,335  * 8,335  0  *

Name of Selling Stockholder


  Shares Beneficially
Owned Prior to
the Offering (1)


  Shares Offered
by This
Prospectus


  Shares Beneficially
Owned Subsequent
to the Offering (1)(2)


  Shares

  Percent

    Shares

  Percent

Societe Generale

  57,247  *  57,247  0  *

Stradling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth Investment Partnership of 1982

  3,334  *  1,667  1,667  *

The Larry Haimovitch 2000 Separate Property Revocable Trust

  3,921  *  3,921  0  *

The Tamkin Living Trust for Trust dated 10/7/96

  128  *  128  0  *

Triton West Group, Inc.

  10,928  *  10,928  0  *

Vertical Ventures Investments, LLC

  15,678  *  15,678  0  *

Victus Capital Management

  25,713  *  25,713  0  *

Gene and Leslie Wang

  7,848  *  4,632  3,216  *

Yulan and Susan Wang

  555  *  555  0  *

Scott Weisman

  9,063  *  9,063  0  *

Stephen Wiggins

  24,466  *  24,466  0  *

Stephen Wilson

  4,584  *  4,584  0  *

Xue Li Qian

  1,881  *  1,881  0  *

Maky Zanganeh

  50,866  *  343  50,523  *
   
     
  
   

Total

  2,397,691     724,729  1,672,962   
   
     
  
   


SHARES BENEFICIALLY SHARES OFFERED SHARES BENEFICIALLY OWNED PRIOR TO BY THIS OWNED SUBSEQUENT NAME AND ADDRESS OF SELLING STOCKHOLDER THE OFFERING PROSPECTUS TO THE OFFERING(1) - --------------------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------------- SHARES PERCENT SHARES PERCENT Heartport, Inc. 200,000 0.56% 200,000 0 0.0% c/o Ethicon, Inc. Rt. 22 West Somerville, NJ 08876-151
*Represents less than 1% of the issued and outstanding shares.
- --------------- (1) Assumes the sale of all shares offered hereby. We have filed a registration statement related to the shares offered hereby and have agreed to keep such registration statement effective until (a) all the common stock has been re-sold or (b) one year after the exercise of the warrant, whichever is earlier. We will pay the registration and filing fees, printing expenses, listing fees, blue sky fees, if any, and fees and disbursements of our counsel in connection with this offering, but the selling stockholder will pay any underwriting discounts, selling commissions and similar expenses relating to the sale of the shares. In addition, we have agreed to indemnify the selling stockholder against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, in connection with this offering. The selling stockholder has agreed to indemnify us and our directors and officers, as well as any person that controls us, against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. 3 7
(1)Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to options and warrants which are currently exercisable, or will become exercisable within 60 days of October 1, 2003, are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person or entity holding such securities but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person or entity. Subject to community property laws, to our knowledge the persons named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.
(2)Assumes for each stockholder the exercise in full of the warrant held by such stockholder and the sale of all shares offered hereby.
(3)Mr. Duggan, the former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Computer Motion, became a member of our board of directors on June 30, 2003 in connection with our acquisition of Computer Motion.

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

The selling stockholder,stockholders, or, subject to applicable law, itstheir pledgees, donees, distributees, transferees or other successors in interest, may sell shares from time to time in public transactions, on or off the Nasdaq National Market, or in private transactions, at prevailing market prices or at privately negotiated prices, including but not limited to, one or any combination of the following types of transactions o

ordinary brokers'brokers’ transactions; o

transactions involving cross or block trades or otherwise on the Nasdaq National Market; o

purchases by brokers, dealers or underwriters as principal and resale by these purchasers for their own accounts pursuant to this prospectus; o "at

“at the market," to or through market makers, or into an existing market for our common stock; o

in other ways not involving market makers or established trading markets, including direct sales to purchasers or sales effected through agents; o

through transactions in options, swaps or other derivatives (whether exchange-listed or otherwise); o

in privately negotiated transactions; or o

to cover short sales. The selling stockholder may sell its shares either alone or in conjunction with one or more underwritten public offerings or non-underwritten public or private offerings by us or other stockholders of our common stock or other of our debt or equity securities.

In effecting sales, brokers or dealers engaged by the selling stockholderstockholders may arrange for other brokers or dealers to participate in the resales. The selling stockholderstockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers, and in connection with those transactions, broker-dealers may engage in short sales of the shares. The selling stockholderstockholders also may sell shares short and deliver the shares to close out such short positions. The selling stockholderstockholders also may enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers that require the delivery to the broker-dealer of the shares, which the broker-dealer may resell pursuant to this prospectus. The selling stockholderstockholders also may pledge the shares to a broker or dealer. Upon a default, the broker or dealer may effect sales of the pledged shares pursuant to this prospectus.

Brokers, dealers or agents may receive compensation in the form of commissions, discounts or concessions from the selling stockholderstockholders in amounts to be negotiated in connection with the sale. The selling stockholderstockholders and any participating brokers or dealers may be deemed to be "underwriters"“underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commission, discount or concession these "underwriters"“underwriters” receive may be deemed to be underwriting compensation.

To the extent required, the following information will be set forth in a supplement to this prospectus: o

information as to whether underwriters who the selling stockholderstockholders may select, or any other broker-dealer, is acting as principal or agent for the selling stockholder; 4 8 o stockholders;

the compensation to be received by underwriters that the selling stockholderstockholders may select or by any broker-dealer acting as principal or agent for the selling stockholder;stockholders; and o

the compensation to be paid to other broker-dealers, in the event the compensation of such other broker-dealers is in excess of usual and customary commissions.

Any dealer or broker participating in any distribution of the shares may be required to deliver a copy of this prospectus, including a prospectus supplement, if any, to any person who purchases any of the shares from or through this dealer or broker.

We have advised the selling stockholderstockholders that it isthey are required to comply with Regulation M promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act during such time as itthey may be engaged in a distribution of the shares. With some exceptions, Regulation M precludes the selling stockholder,stockholders, any affiliated purchasers and any broker-dealer or other person who participates in such distribution from bidding for or purchasing, or attempting to induce any person to bid for or purchase any security that is the subject of the distribution until the entire distribution is complete. Regulation M also prohibits any bids or purchases made in order to stabilize the price of a security in connection with the distribution of that security. All of the foregoing may affect the marketability of the common stock. We will not receive any

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the proceeds from the selling stockholder's sale of our common stock. LEGAL MATTERSshares being offered hereby will be passed upon for us by Latham & Watkins ofLLP, Menlo Park, California will issue an opinion to us about certain legal matters with respect toCalifornia.

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements and schedule of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. appearing in Intuitive Surgical’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the common stock being offered in this prospectus. Alan C. Mendelson, a partner of Latham & Watkins, owns 2,000 shares of our common stock. EXPERTSyear ended December 31, 2002 have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, have audited ouras set forth in their report included therein and incorporated herein by reference. Such consolidated financial statements are incorporated herein by reference in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

The consolidated financial statements of Computer Motion, Inc. at December 31, 2002, and for the year then ended, appearing in Computer Motion, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in their report thereon included therein and incorporated herein by reference, (which contain an explanatory paragraph describing conditions that raise substantial doubt about Computer Motion Inc.’s ability to continue as a going concern as described in ourNote 1 to the consolidated financial statements). Such consolidated financial statements are incorporated herein by reference in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

After reasonable efforts, Computer Motion has been unable to obtain the consent of Arthur Andersen LLP to the incorporation into the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part, of their report with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Computer Motion which appear in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, as set forth in their report, which is incorporated by reference in this prospectus2001 and elsewhere in the registration statement. Our financial statements are incorporated by reference in reliance on Ernst & Young LLP's report, given on their authority as experts in accounting and auditing. 5 9 WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION We are a reporting company and file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. You may read and copyDecember 31, 2000. Under these reports, proxy statements and other information at the SEC's public reference rooms at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20549. You can request copies of these documents by writing to the SEC and paying a fee for the copying cost. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for more information about the operation of the public reference rooms. Our SEC filings are also available at the SEC's Web site at "http://www.sec.gov". In addition, you can read and copy our SEC filings at the office of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. at 1735 K Street, Washington, D.C. 20006. The SEC allows us to "incorporate by reference" information that we file with them, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is an important part of this prospectus, and information that we file later with the SEC will automatically update and supersede this information. Further, all filings we makecircumstances, Rule 437(a) under the Securities Exchange Act after the date of the initial registration statement and prior to effectiveness ofpermits the registration statement shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference into this prospectus. We incorporate by reference the documents listed belowfiled without a written consent from Arthur Andersen. The absence of such consent may limit your recovery on certain claims. In particular, and any future filings wewithout limitation, you will make with the SECnot be able to assert claims against Arthur Andersen under Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d)11 of the Securities Exchange Act for any untrue statement of 1934: 1. Oura material fact contained in Computer Motion’s financial statements which appear in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000 (including items incorporated by reference from the Registrant's Proxy Statement for its 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders) filed on March 30, 2001 (File No. 000-30713); 2. Our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001 filed on May 14, 2001; 3. Our Definitive Proxy Statement for our 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed on April 19, 2001; 4. Our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 9, 2001; 5. The description of our common stock contained in our Registration Statement on Form 8-A (File No. 000-30713) filed on May 26, 2000. We will provideor any omission to you at no coststate a copy of any and all of the information incorporated by reference into the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. You may make a request for copies of this information in writing or by telephone. Requests shouldmaterial fact required to be directed to: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Attention: Investor Relations 1340 W. Middlefield Road Mountain View, CA 94043 (650) 237-7000 6 10 stated therein.

PART II

INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS ITEM

Item 14.    OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION SecuritiesOther Expenses of Issuance and Exchange Commission Registration Fee $ 652.00 Legal Fees and Expenses 5,000 Accountants' Fees and Expenses 5,000 Miscellaneous 5,000 Total 15,652.00 ========= Distribution.

The foregoing items,expenses to be paid by us in connection with the distribution of the common stock being registered are as set forth in the following table. All amounts shown are estimates except for the Securities and Exchange Commission Registration Fee, are estimated. ITEMregistration fee.

Securities and Exchange Commission Registration Fee

  $864

Legal Fees and Expenses

   20,000

Accounting Fees and Expenses

   10,000

Miscellaneous

   4,136
   

Total

  $35,000
   

Item 15.    INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS Under Section 145Indemnification of the Delaware General Corporation Law, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. has broad powers to indemnify its directorsDirectors and officers against liabilities they may incur in such capacities, including liabilities under the Securities ActOfficers.

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of 1933. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.'s certificate of incorporation and by-laws include provisions to (1) eliminate the personal liability of its directors for monetary damages resulting from breaches of their fiduciary duty to the extent permitted by Section 102(b)(7) of the General Corporation Law of Delaware and (2) require Intuitive Surgical, Inc. to indemnify its directors and officersIncorporation, as amended, provides that to the fullest extent permitted by Section 145the Delaware General Corporation Law, our directors shall not be personally liable to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director. Under current Delaware law, liability of a director may not be limited (i) for any breach of the Delaware Law, including circumstancesdirector’s duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) in respect of certain unlawful dividend payments or stock redemptions or repurchases and (iv) for any transaction from which indemnification is otherwise discretionary. Pursuant to Section 145the director derives an improper personal benefit. The effect of the Delaware Law,provision of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, is to eliminate our rights and the rights of our stockholders (through stockholders’ derivative suits on our behalf) to recover monetary damages against a corporation generally hasdirector for breach of the powerfiduciary duty of care as a director (including breaches resulting from negligent or grossly negligent behavior) except in the situations described in clauses (i) through (iv) above. This provision does not limit or eliminate our rights or the rights of any of our stockholders to seek nonmonetary relief such as an injunction or rescission in the event of a breach of a directors duty of care. In addition, our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, provides that we shall indemnify to the fullest extent permitted by law our directors, officers and employees and persons serving at any other enterprise as a director, officer or employee at our request against losses incurred by any such person by reason of the fact that such person was acting in such capacity.

In addition, we have entered into agreements with certain of our directors and officers pursuant to which we have agreed to indemnify its present and former directors, officers, employees and agentssuch persons against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and certain amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by them in connection with any suit to which they are,such indemnified person if such person is or arewas a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of theirthe fact that such indemnified person is or was our director, officer, employee or agent, or a director, officer, employee or agent of any of our subsidiaries, due to any action or inaction on the part of the indemnified person while an officer or director, or because the indemnified person is or was serving in such positionsat our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, so long as theysuch indemnified person acted in good faith and in a manner they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to theour best interest of the corporation,interests and, with respect to any criminal action theyor proceeding, if such indemnified person had no reasonable cause to believe their conduct was unlawful. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. believes that these provisions are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons as directors and officers. These provisions do not eliminate the directors' duty of care, and, in appropriate circumstances, equitable remedies such as injunctivehis or other forms of non-monetary relief will remain available under Delaware law. In addition, each director will continue to be subject to liability for breach of the directors' duty of loyalty to Intuitive Surgical, Inc., for acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional misconduct, for knowing violations of law, for acts or omissions that the director believes to be contrary to the best interests of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. or its stockholders, for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit, for acts or omissions involving a reckless disregard for the directors' duty to Intuitive Surgical, Inc. or its stockholders when the director was aware or should have been aware of a risk of serious injury to Intuitive Surgical, Inc. or its stockholders, for acts or omissions that constitute an unexcused pattern of inattention that amounts to an abdication of the director's duty to Intuitive Surgical, Inc. or its stockholders, for improper transactions between the director and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and for improper distributions to stockholders and loans to directors and officers. The II-1 11 provision also does not affect a director's responsibilities under any other law, such as the federal securities law or state or federal environmental laws. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. has entered into indemnity agreements with each of its directors and executive officers that require Intuitive Surgical, Inc. to indemnify such persons against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts incurred (including expenses of a derivative action) in connection with any proceeding, whether actual or threatened, to which any such person may be made a party by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director or an executive officer of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. or any of its affiliated enterprises, provided such person acted in good faith and in a manner such persons reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. and, with respect to any criminal proceeding, has no reasonable cause to believe hisher conduct was unlawful. The indemnification agreements also provide that such indemnified persons will be entitled to an advance of expenses to meet the obligations indemnified against as set forth procedures that will apply in the event of a claim for indemnification thereunder. At present, there is no pending litigation or proceeding involving a director or officer of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. as to which indemnification is being sought. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. has an insurance policy covering the officers and directors of Intuitive Surgical, Inc. with respect to certain liabilities, including liabilities arising under the Securities Act or otherwise. ITEMabove.

II-1


Item 16.    EXHIBITS Exhibits.

3.2(1) Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant.
3.2(2) Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant
3.3(1) Bylaws of Registrant.
4.1(1) Specimen Stock Certificate.
4.2  Form of Warrant to purchase Common Stock of Computer Motion, Inc., dated February 13, 2002. (3)
4.3  Form of Warrant to purchase Common Stock of Computer Motion, Inc., dated February 16, 2001. (4)
4.4  Form of Redeemable Warrant to purchase Common Stock of Computer Motion, Inc., dated September 22, 2000. (5)
4.5  Form of Redeemable Warrant to purchase Common Stock of Computer Motion, Inc. (6)
5.1  Opinion of Latham & Watkins LLP.
23.1  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors.
23.2  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors.
23.3  Consent of Latham & Watkins LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1).
24.1  Power of Attorney (included on signature page hereto).

EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT 3.2(1) Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant. 3.3(1) Bylaws of Registrant. 4.2(1) Specimen Stock Certificate. 4.3(1) Warrant
(1)Incorporated by reference to Purchase Shares of Common Stock, dated April 26, 2000. 5.1(2) Opinion of Latham & Watkins. 23.1(2) Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors. 23.2(2) Consent of Latham & Watkins. Reference is madeexhibits filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-33016).
(2)Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-108713).
(3)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5.1. 24.1(2) Power4.2 of Attorney (set forthComputer Motion, Inc.’s Registration Statement on signature page)Form S-3 filed February 28, 2002 (File No. 333-83552).
- ------------------------------ (1) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-33016). (2) Filed herewith ITEM
(4)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Computer Motion, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 26, 2001.
(5)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Computer Motion, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2000.
(6)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of Computer Motion, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed June 18, 1997 (File No. 333-29505).

Item 17.    UNDERTAKINGS The undersigned registrantUndertakings.

We hereby undertakes: undertake:

(1)    To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, pursuant to this registration statement, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

(i)    Toto include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933; Act;

(ii)    Toto reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or II-2 12 decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than a 20 percent20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the "Calculation“Calculation of Registration Fee"Fee” table in the effective registration statement; and

(iii)    Toto include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement;

II-2


provided, however, that information required to be included in a post-effective amendment by paragraphs (1)(i) and (1)(ii) above may be contained in periodic reports filed by the registrant pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act that are incorporated by reference in the registration statement.

(2)    That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof; and thereof.

(3)    To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering. The undersigned registrant

We hereby undertakesundertake that, for the purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act, of 1933, each filing of the registrant'sour annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) ofor Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act (and, where applicable, each filing of 1934an employee benefit plan’s annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act) that is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrantIntuitive Surgical pursuant to the provisions described in Item 15,this registration statement above, or otherwise, the registrant haswe have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrantus of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrantus in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted against us by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrantwe will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

We hereby undertake that (1) for purposes of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from this prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective and (2) for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that tie shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

II-3 13


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, of 1933, the Registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form S-3 and has duly caused this Registration Statement on Form S-3 to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Mountain View, County of Santa Clara, State ofSunnyvale, California, on the 11th day of July, 2001. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. By: /s/ Lonnie M. Smith ---------------------------------- Lonnie M. Smith Title: President and Chief Executive Officer November 3, 2003.

INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.

By

/s/    LONNIE M. SMITH        


Lonnie M. Smith

President and Chief Executive Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL PERSON BY THESE PRESENTS, that each

Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Lonnie M. Smith and Alan C. Mendelson,Susan K. Barnes, and each or any of them, his or her true and lawful agent, proxyattorney-in-fact and attorney-in-fact, each acting alone,agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead in any and inall capacities, to sign any and all capacities,amendments (including post-effective amendments), and any registration statement for the same offering that is to (1) act on, signbe effective under Rule 462(b) of the Securities Act, and to file each of the same, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, anygranting unto said attorneys-in-fact and all amendments (including post-effective amendments)agents, and each of them, full power and authority to this registration statement together with all schedulesdo and exhibits theretoperform each and any subsequent registration statement filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, together with all schedulesevery act and exhibits thereto, (2) act on, signthing requisite and file such certificates, instruments, agreements and other documents as may be necessary or appropriate in connection therewith, (3) act on and file any supplement to any prospectus included in this registration statement or any such amendment or any subsequent registration statement filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and (4) take any and all actions which may be necessary or appropriate to be done in and about the premises, as fully forto all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby approving, ratifying and confirming all that such agent, proxysaid attorneys-in-fact and attorney-in-factagents or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof. hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act, of 1933, as amended, this registration statement on Form S-3Registration Statement has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SIGNATURE TITLE DATE

Signature


Title


Date


/s/    LONNIE M. SMITH        


Lonnie M. Smith

President, and Chief Executive July 11, 2001 /s/ Lonnie M. Smith Officer - ---------------------------------------and Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer) Lonnie M. Smith

November 3, 2003

/s/    SUSAN K. BARNES        


Susan K. Barnes

Senior Vice President, Finance, Chief July 11, 2001 Financial Officer and Assistant /s/ Susan K. Barnes Secretary - --------------------------------------- (Principal Financial and Susan K. Barnes Accounting Officer) /s/

November 3, 2003

/s/    ROBERT W. DUGGAN        


Robert W. Duggan

Director

November 3, 2003

/s/    SCOTT S. HALSTED        


Scott S. Halsted

Director July 11, 2001 - --------------------------------------- Scott S. Halsted

II-4 14
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE /s/ Russell

November 3, 2003

/s/    ERIC H. HALVORSON        


Eric H. Halvorson

Director

November 3, 2003

/s/    RUSSELL C. Hirsch Director July 11, 2001 - ---------------------------------------HIRSCH        


                     Russell C. Hirsch, M.D., Ph.D. /s/

Director

November 3, 2003

II-4


Signature


Title


Date


/s/    RICHARD J. KRAMER        


Richard J. Kramer

Director July 11, 2001 - --------------------------------------- Richard

November 3, 2003

/s/    ALAN J. Kramer /s/ James A. Lawrence Director July 13, 2001 - --------------------------------------- James A. Lawrence /s/ Alan J. Levy Director July 13, 2001 - --------------------------------------- LEVY        


Alan J. Levy, Ph.D.

Director July __, 2001 - --------------------------------------- Frederick

November 3, 2003

/s/    FREDERIC H. MOLL        


Frederic H. Moll, M.D.

Director

November 3, 2003

/s/    BENNETT NUSSBAUM        


Bennett Nussbaum

Director

November 3, 2003

II-5 15 INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT 3.2(1) Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant. 3.3(1) Bylaws of Registrant. 4.2(1) Specimen Stock Certificate. 4.3(1) Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock, dated April 26, 2000. 5.1(2) Opinion of Latham & Watkins. 23.1(2) Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors. 23.2(2) Consent of Latham & Watkins. Reference is made to Exhibit 5.1. 24.1(2) Power of Attorney (set forth on signature page).
- ------------------------------ (1) Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-33016). (2) Filed herewith II-6