FULLER, TUBB, POMEROY & STOKES
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
201 ROBERT S. KERR AVENUE, SUITE 1000
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102
G. M. FULLER (1920-1999) TELEPHONE 405-235-2575
JERRY TUBB FACSIMILE 405-232-8384
DAVID POMEROY
TERRY STOKES
-----
OF COUNSEL:
MICHAEL A. BICKFORD
THOMAS J. KENAN
ROLAND TAGUE
May 31, 2000
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549
Re: Form S-4 registration statement
filed by Starfest, Inc., Commission
File No. 000-29913
Gentlemen:
In accordance with the provisions of Regulation S-T, the undersigned, as
counsel to Starfest, Inc., the issuer, files the issuer's Form S-4 registration
statement.
We are sending, by FedEx, three courtesy copies for your use.
Please contact the undersigned regarding any questions concerning the
above. You are requested to communicate with me either by telephone
(405-235-2575) or, in the instance of written communications, by fax
(405-232-8384) followed by a mailed copy of the faxed transmissions, or by
e-mail (kenan@ftpslaw.com).
Sincerely,
/s/ Thomas J. Kenan
---------------------------------------
Thomas J. Kenan
e-mail: kenan@ftpslaw.com
/sa
Enclosure
cc: Michael Huemmer
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Commission File No. 000-29913333-38838
AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Starfest, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California 7372 95-4442384
- -------------- ---------------------------- ------------------------------------------- ----------------
(state of (Primary Standard Industrial (IRS Employer
incorporation) ClassificationClassifaction Code Number) I.D. Number)
94944602 East Redfield Road, #1136
Scottsdale,Palo Brea Lane
Cave Creek, AZ 8526085331
480-551-8280
---------------------------------------------
(Address and telephone number of registrant's
principal executive offices)
Michael Huemmer
94944602 East Redfield Road, #1136
Scottsdale,Palo Brea Lane
Cave Creek, AZ 8526085331
480-551-8280
---------------------------------------------------------
(Name, address and telephone number of agent for service)
Copies to:
Thomas J. Kenan, Esq.
201 Robert S. Kerr Avenue, Suite 1000
Oklahoma City, OK 73102
Approximate date of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable
after the Registration Statement becomes effective.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in
connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with
General Instruction G, check the following box. [ ]
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering
pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and
list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering.[ ]
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d)
under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. [ ]
Calculation of Registration Fee
Title of Proposed Proposed
each class maximum maximum
of securities Amount offering aggregate Amount of
to be to be price offering registration
registered registered per unit price feeTITLE OF PROPOSED PROPOSED
EACH CLASS MAXIMUM MAXIMUM
OF SECURITIES AMOUNT OFFERING AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF
TO BE TO BE PRICE OFFERING REGISTRATION
REGISTERED REGISTERED PER UNIT PRICE FEE
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common StockCOMMON STOCK 96,957,713 $0.001 $32,320 $8.54(1)
================================================================================
(1) These 96,957,713 shares are to be offered in exchange for all the issued
and outstanding shares of capital stock of Concierge, Inc. in a proposed
merger. Concierge, Inc. has an accumulated capital deficit. The
registration fee is based upon one-third of the par value (96,957,713
shares times $0.001 par value divided bytimes one-third) of the securities to be
received in the merger transaction.
Regulation 230.457(f)(2).
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or
dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall
file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration
statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with section 8(a) of
the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall become
effective on such date as the Commission acting pursuant to said section 8(a)
may determine.
2
PROSPECTUS-PROXY STATEMENT
Starfest, Inc.
96,957,713 Shares of Common Stock
Starfest, Inc. offers these shares of common stock only to the stockholders of
Concierge, Inc. We propose that Concierge merge into our company.
-------------------
Our common stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board. Its symbol is "SFST."
-------------------
The approval of the merger of Concierge Neither the Securities and Exchange
Concierge into our company is equivalent to a Commission nor any state securities
equivalent to a purchase of our commission has approved or
securities. This involves or determined if this prospectus-
a high disapproved these securities or degree of risk. See "Risk Factors," determined if this prospectus-
beginning on page 2. proxy statement is truthful or
beginning on page 3. complete. Any representation to
the contrary is a criminal offsense.
Starfest, Inc.
9494offense.
STARFEST, INC.
4602 East Redfield Road, #1136
Scottsdale,Palo Brea Lane
Cave Creek, AZ 8526085331
Telephone 480-551-8280
MayAugust __, 20002001
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PagePAGE
----
Summary of Proposed Transaction.............................................proposed transaction 1
Risk Factors ............................................... 2factors 3
Risks that are specific to the concierge stockholders
1. If you approve the merger, you will suffer
an immediate 19.2 percent dilution in your
percentage ownership and book value of
Concierge .............................. 2concierge 3
2. Starfest could have unknown or contingent liabilities
not reflected in its financial statements 3
Risks that are specific to the starfest shareholders
3. Concierge lacks an operating history.
Should Concierge not achieve profitable
operations,history, has never
operated at a profit, has never generated any
perceivedsignificant revenues, has a limited operating
history, and has only limited cash available
for working capital 3
4. Starfest will lose most of the income tax benefits
of beingits net operating loss carryforward 4
5. Concierge's bylaws will become the bylaws of the
post-merger company. Certain of those bylaws
could adversely affect the starfest shareholders 4
Risks that apply to the shareholders of both companies
6. The auditors of both starfest and concierge have added a
public"going concern" paragraph to their most recent
audit reports 5
7. This registration of Starfest stock for the
proposed merger with concierge will not
generate any proceeds to be used by
Starfest or the post-merger company may never
materialize .......................................... 3
3.in
furthering its business objectives 5
8. Neither Starfest nor concierge has received
nor will receive an independent, expert
opinion on the fairness of the terms of
the proposed merger 5
9. The post-merger company proposes to
transact commerce on the internet and
will be exposed to risks of loss associated
with credit card fraud 5
10. It is likely that trading in our stock will
be volatile and limited ................................. 3
4. Post-merger operations5
11. Trading in the common stock of the post-merger
company will most likely be subject to the
inhibiting effects of the commission's
"penny stock" trading rules 6
12. Concierge has contingent liability of $2,009,610
for possible violations of registration requirements
of the securities act and of state securities laws 6
13. The post-merger company is subject to a contingent
claim of a shareholder for the issuance to him of
an additional 3,961,835 shares of post-merger
ii
common stock of the company. Such a claim, if
asserted and adjudged valid, would result in a
3.2 percent reduction in the equity of the
company for all other shareholders. 6
14. The post-merger company may requireneed additional funds that we do not have ............................ 3
5.funding 8
15. Our success depends on our ability to retain
Allen E. Kahn and other key personnel ................ 3
6.8
16. Management and their affiliates will control all
matters submitted to shareholder votes 8
17. One year after the proposed merger should become
effective, certain trading restrictions will
be relaxed on the 48.3 percent interest in
the post-merger company to be owned by
concierge's present affiliates. This will result
in a large block of stock being eligible for
unlimited sale into the trading market and
could exert downward pressure on the price
of the stock 8
18. The technology for concierge's product, the
personal communications attendant, is not
patented by concierge and is available to
competitors. Strong competition is expected 9
19. Should a change in management seem necessary, it
will be difficult for the non-
managementnon-management
stockholders to do this ................... 3
7. Starfest will lose most of the income tax benefits
of its net operating
loss carryforward .................................... 39
Terms of the Transaction.................................................... 4Transaction 10
Material Conditions to the Merger 10
Terms of the Merger................................................. 5Merger 10
Reasons for the Merger ............................................. 512
Description of Securities........................................... 5Securities 12
Common Stock................................................. 5Stock 12
Voting Rights......................................... 5Rights 12
Dividend Rights....................................... 5Rights 12
Liquidation Rights.................................... 5Rights 12
Preemptive Rights..................................... 5Rights 13
Registrar and Transfer Agent.......................... 5Agent 13
Dissenters' Rights.................................... 5Rights 13
Change in Control .................................... 613
Preferred Stock.............................................. 6Stock 13
Differences Between Rights of Stockholders of
Starfest and of Concierge ................................... 613
Accounting Treatment of Proposed Merger ............................ 614
Federal Income Tax Consequences............................................. 6Consequences 14
The Merger ............................................... 614
Stockholders of Concierge.................................... 6Concierge 14
Agreement of Merger ................................................ 614
Pro Forma Financial Information and Dilution........................ 7Dilution 19
Material Contacts Among the Companies....................................... 9Companies 22
Background of the Transaction 22
Interests of Named Experts and Counsel ..................................... 9
ii26
iii
Indemnification ............................................................ 926
Penny Stock Regulations .................................................... 1027
Information About Starfest.................................................. 12Starfest 30
Business Development ............................................... 1230
Business of Starfest ............................................... 1231
Plan of Operation 32
Description of Property ............................................ 1332
Legal Proceedings................................................... 13Proceedings 32
Market for Starfest's Common Stock and Related
Stockholder Matters.......................................... 13Matters 32
Rule 144 and Rule 145 Restrictions on Trading....................... 14Trading 33
Dividends ............................................... 1534
Reports to Stockholders ..................................... 1535
Registration Statement ...................................... 1535
Stock Certificates .......................................... 1635
Financial Statements................................................ 16Statements 35
Management's Plan of Operation ..................................... 1635
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosures ........................ 1636
Information About Concierge................................................. 16Concierge 37
Overview ........................................................... 1637
Concierge's Plan of Operations...................................... 17Operation 37
Description of the PCA ............................................. 17PCATM 38
The Market ......................................................... 1739
Competition 40
Distribution Methods ............................................... 1740
Production Costs ................................................... 1741
Government Approval of Principal Products .......................... 1743
Government Regulations ............................................. 1843
Properties ......................................................... 1843
Dependence on Major Customers and Suppliers ........................ 1843
Seasonality ........................................................ 1844
Research and Development ........................................... 1844
Environmental Controls ............................................. 1844
Year 2000 Computer Problem ......................................... 1844
Number of Employees ................................................ 1844
Venue of Sales ..................................................... 1844
Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights and Intellectual Property .......... 1844
Legal Proceedings .................................................. 1844
Concierge Management's Plan of Operation ........................... 1944
Liquidity .......................................................... 2044
Product Research and Development ................................... 2046
Other Expected Developments ........................................ 2046
Market for Common Equity and
Related Stockholder Matters ................................. 2047
Market Information ................................................. 2047
Holders ............................................................ 2047
Dividends .......................................................... 2047
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosures ................................... 2047
iv
Financial Statements................................................ 20Statements 47
Voting and Management Information........................................... 21Information 48
Date, Time and Place Information ................................... 21
iii
48
Starfest ............................................... 2148
Concierge ............................................... 2148
Voting Procedure............................................. 21Procedure 48
Revocability of Proxy............................................... 21Proxy 49
Effect of the Merger ............................................... 2149
Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal..................................... 22Appraisal 50
Persons Making the Solicitation..................................... 22
Interest of Certain Persons in the Proposed Merger ................. 22Solicitation 51
Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof..................... 22Thereof 51
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management................................................... 24Management 52
Directors, Executive Officers and Significant Employees............. 27Employees 55
Executive Compensation ............................................. 2957
Other Arrangements .......................................... 2957
Stock Options ............................................... 2958
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions...................... 30Transactions 58
Transactions with Insiders and Promoters..................... 30Promoters 58
Financial Statements Index ................................................. 3261
Appendix A - Amended Agreement of Merger............................................A-1
ivMerger A-1
v
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED TRANSACTION
Our company, Starfest, Inc., proposes to merge with another company,
Concierge, Inc. The merger will occur only if the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of common stock of each company approve it. A vote to approve
or reject the merger will be taken soon at special stockholders' meetings of
each company.
Starfest recently sold all its assets on December 31, 1999 and today has no
business. Concierge was organized in 1996, has not yet received any revenue from
its business, and is a development stage company. Starfest'sBoth Starfest and Concierge
received opinions from their auditors noting facts that raise substantial doubts
about the companies' abilities to continue as going concerns. Starfest is a
company that files periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and whose stock has tradedis publicly held and is listed on the OTC Bulletin Board since 1996, when it was in the business of producing
country-western theme events. Concierge'sBoard.
Concierge is a closely-held private company whose stock doesis not trade.listed on any
public stock exchange.
Concierge has developed computer software, called the "Personal
Communications AttendantTM," that responds to the user's spoken commands to
read, verbalize and manage e-mail traffic stored on the user's personal
computer. The spoken commands can be made from a remote telephone. Concierge
commenced marketing this software in Aprilinitial delivery of its product during September 2000.
Should the stockholders of Starfest and Concierge approve the merger
between the two companies, Starfest will be the surviving entity but its
business and management will be that of Concierge. Starfest will change its name
to "Concierge Technologies, Inc." The surviving company will have Starfest's
articles of incorporation but Concierge's bylaws.
Should each company approve the merger, each Concierge stockholder will
receive 70.44467.5355 shares of Starfest common stock for each share owned of
Concierge's outstanding 1,435,655 shares of common stock. This amounts to
96,957,713 shares of Starfest stock and would represent 80.8 percent of the
outstanding stock after the merger. The Starfest stockholders will retain their
shares of stock in Starfest, without increase or decrease. Their 23,000,000
shares of Starfest common stock will represent 19.2 percent of the outstanding
stock after the merger.
Starfest's address and telephone number is on the cover page of this
Prospectus. The address and telephone number of Concierge is as follows:
Concierge, Inc.
6033 West Century Boulevard, Suite 1278
Los Angeles, CA 90045
Telephone 310-216-6334
AsThe table below compares the values of January 14, 2000,a single share of common stock
and the aggregate value of all issued shares of common stock of each of Starfest
and Concierge on two dates:
1
o the last trading date precedingday before the public announcement of the proposed
merger, and
o the most recent date of financial statements of the two companies
included in this Prospectus-Proxy Statement:
Starfest Concierge
Market Value Book Value
------------ ----------
January 14, 2000 - the last
trading date preceding the
public announcement of the
proposed merger:
Per share $ 0.29 $
All issued shares $ 6,670,000 $ (4,610)
March 31, 2001 - the most
recent date of financial
statements of the two companies:
Per share $ 0.094 $ 0.17
All issued shares $ 2,167,000 $ 228,061
The market value of theStarfest's common stock in the above table represents
the closing bid price of Starfest andits common stock on the indicated dates as reported by
the OTC Bulletin Board. The book value of theConcierge's common stock represents,
for all its issued shares, the value of total stockholders' equity as reflected
on its financial statements. The book value of a single share of Concierge
were as follows:
Starfest Concierge
-------- ---------
$0.29 ($24,010) (capital deficit)common stock represents total stockholders' equity divided by the number of
shares outstanding on the indicated dates.
A majority vote of all outstanding shares by each company is required
for approval of the proposed merger. The percentage of 1
outstanding shares of
each company that its directors, executive officers and their affiliates are
entitled to vote are as follows:
Starfest Concierge
- -------- ---------
3.7% 62.1%
The directors, executive officers and affiliates of Starfest have agreed to
vote in favor of the merger. Concierge's directors, executive officers and their
affiliates have agreed to vote in favor of the merger only if the other
Concierge -------- ---------
3.7% 66.5%shareholders, by their majority vote, vote in favor of the merger.
There are no federal or state regulatory requirements that must be complied
with or approval obtained in connection with the proposed merger.
Dissenters' rights of appraisal exist for the stockholders of each of the
two companies. See "Voting and Management Information - Dissenters' Rights of
Appraisal."
In2
Based upon the opinion or our tax counsel, Thomas J. Kenan of Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma, it is our opinion that the merger will qualify as a tax-free
reorganization under Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code and, accordingly,
there are no adverse federal income tax consequences to stockholders of either
company should the merger be approved. Mr. Kenan's opinion is filed as Exhibit 8
to the Form S-4 registration statement of which this Prospectus-Proxy Statement
is a part.
RISK FACTORS
The stockholdersApproval of Starfest have little risk in approving the proposed
merger. Starfest's business has failed, and it has insufficient assets to
commence a new business. A merger with any company with a business - even one,
such as Concierge, which is only now bringing its unified messaging product to
market, represents an improvement over Starfest's existing state. Accordingly,
the following risk factors are primarily directed at the stockholders of
Concierge. Nevertheless, should the merger betweeninvolves certain risks specific to Starfest
shareholders and other risks specific to Concierge be
approved,shareholders. There are
additional risks that both companies' shareholders are exposed to. Voting to
approve the Starfest stockholders will be exposed to many of the risks set
forth below.
The stockholders of Concierge are makingmerger is an investment decision that involves a high degree of
risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors as well as the
terms of the merger in determining whether to approve the merger:
Risks That Are Specific to the Concierge Stockholders.
1. If You Approve the Merger, You Will Suffer an Immediate 19.2
Percent Dilution in Your Percentage Ownership and Book Value of
Concierge.
This dilution will be solely for obtaining the possibility, but
not the certainty, of obtaining the following benefits:
o the common stock of our combined company will trade in the
stock market;
o you can sell your shares of stock in the stock market, if you
wish, or buy more;
o our combined company can try to buy other companies with our
tradeable stock rather than with money; and
2
o our combined, public company should be better able to raise new
capital through the sale of stock than Concierge now can.
2. Concierge Lacks an Operating History. Should Concierge Not
Achieve Profitable Operations, Any Perceived Benefits of Being a Public
Company May Never Materialize.
Concierge has only now commenced operations and has not yet
achieved profitable operations. There is no assurance that profitable operations
can be obtained or maintained. Should you approve the merger, you will suffer an immediate 19.2 percent
dilution in your percentage ownership and our combined
company continuesbook value of Concierge.
The Starfest shareholders own 23 million shares of common stock
and will continue to operate at a loss,own these shares after the perceived benefitsmerger. Concierge shareholders
will convert their 1,435,655 Concierge shares, pro rata, into 96,957,713 shares
of theStarfest common stock, market may also be lost.
3. It is Likely That Trading in Our Stock Will be Volatile and Limited.
4. Post-Merger Operations May Require Additional Funds That We Do
Not Have.
Should the proposed merger be approved, the post-merger company
may need additional funding to achieve its plan of operations. If so, we have
not identified the source for this funding. We give no assurance that the needed
funds can be obtained.
5. Our Success Depends on Our Ability to Retain Allen E. Kahn and
Other Key Personnel.
Should the merger occur, the post-merger company will be reliant
on the continued services of several key personnel. The loss of any of them
could adversely affect future operations. These persons are Allen E. Kahn, chief
executive officer of Concierge; F. Patrick Flaherty, executive vice president;
and Donald V. Fluken, vice president for finance and chief financial officer.
6. Should a Change in Management Seem Necessary, It Will be
Difficult for the Non-Management Stockholders to Do This.
Should the proposed merger be approved, the company's officers
and directors and their affiliates will own approximately 65.9or 80.8 percent of the common stockoutstanding shares after the
merger. This 19.2 percent dilution -
o purchases no tangible assets,
o acquires no additions to management, and
o adds nothing to Concierge's business.
2. Starfest could have unknown or contingent liabilities not reflected
in its financial statements.
Starfest has been an operating company. It failed in its business
endeavors. Starfest's present management believes that its financial statements
accurately reflect Starfest's liabilities at $407,893 on December 31, 2000.
Nevertheless, there is always the possibility that a dormant corporation, such
as Starfest, that earlier operated as a business concern may have real or
contingent liabilities that are not known to its present management and that
could surface once the company becomes viable. Your investment in Concierge is
exposed to this risk if the merger is approved.
Risks That Are Specific to the Starfest Shareholders.
3. Concierge lacks an operating history, has never operated at a profit,
has never generated any significant revenues, has a limited operating history,
and has only limited cash available for working capital.
3
Concierge was incorporated in the state of Nevada on September
20, 1996 and commenced operations on that date. It devoted its activities
primarily to product development and has only recently begun selling its
product. It has lost $1,725,412 from inception through December 31, 2000, which
is the amount of its accumulated deficit. Sales and shipment of its initial
product commenced in September 2000. It had available on December 31, 2000, for
working capital, cash of approximately $3,356 and prepaid expenses of $245,800,
representing prepaid royalties and product manufacturing expense. On December
31, 2000, it had current liabilities of $68,359 and contingent liabilities of
$2,009,610 for possible violations of the company. This amount may enable them to determinesecurities laws regarding the
outcomeregistration of any vote affecting the control of the company.
7. Starfest Will Lose Most of the Income Tax Benefits of Its Net
Operating Loss Carryforward.securities.
4. STARFEST WILL LOSE MOST OF THE INCOME TAX BENEFITS OF ITS NET OPERATING
LOSS CARRYFORWARD.
Starfest had a net operating loss carryforward of $2,656,857$3,055,206 at December
31, 1999.2000. This may be used to offset otherwise taxable income for several years
in the future. However, under present tax laws if the ownership of more than 50
percent in value of the stock of Starfest changes during a three-year period,
this limits severely the amount of taxable income of any "post-change year" that
may be offset using "pre-change losses." The merger with Concierge will effect
an immediate 80.8 percent change in such ownership and will of itself trigger
such a restriction. 3Virtually all of the benefits of offsetting future taxable
income against the $3,055,206 operating loss carryforward will be lost.
5. CONCIERGE'S BYLAWS WILL BECOME THE BYLAWS OF THE POST-MERGER COMPANY.
CERTAIN OF THOSE BYLAWS COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT THE STARFEST SHAREHOLDERS.
The ability of the shareholders to call special meetings will be
Adversely affected. Starfest's bylaws provide that the record holders of ten
percent of the outstanding shares can call a special meeting of the
shareholders. Concierge's bylaws require 25 percent.
Directors will become able to be removed for cause by action of the
other directors, which is in addition to the shareholders' right of removal by a
majority vote.
The obligatory indemnification of directors, officers and agents of
The corporation, against their reasonable expenses in defending themselves in
actions brought against them, will increase significantly. Starfest limits this
to instances where an agent of the company has been successful on the merits in
defense of such a proceeding. Concierge's bylaws provide for this
indemnification in all instances except where the agent actually is adjudged to
be liable for gross negligence or misconduct in the performance of his duties.
Risks That Apply to the Shareholders of Both Companies.
4
6. THE AUDITORS OF BOTH STARFEST AND CONCIERGE HAVE ADDED A "GOING
CONCERN" PARAGRAPH TO THEIR MOST RECENT AUDIT REPORTS.
Starfest sold all its assets on December 31, 1999 and has no
business. Concierge has not yet received any significant revenue from its
business. Both companies' auditors have added a "going concern" paragraph to
their most recent audit reports. A "going concern" paragraph with an audit
opinion means that the auditor has identified certain conditions or events that
indicate there could be reasonable doubt about the company's ability to continue
as a going entity for a period of one year from the date of the financial
statements.
7. THIS REGISTRATION OF STARFEST STOCK FOR THE PROPOSED MERGER WITH
CONCIERGE WILL NOT GENERATE ANY PROCEEDS TO BE USED BY STARFEST OR THE
POST-MERGER COMPANY IN FURTHERING ITS BUSINESS OBJECTIVES.
Should the proposed merger be effected, the post-merger company
must file an appropriate registration statement with the Commission if it is to
generate proceeds in a public offering.
8. NEITHER STARFEST NOR CONCIERGE HAS RECEIVED, NOR WILL RECEIVE, AN
INDEPENDENT, EXPERT OPINION ON THE FAIRNESS OF THE TERMS OF THE PROPOSED MERGER.
The terms of the proposed merger were negotiated by the
management of the two companies without the benefit of a "fairness opinion" by
expert and independent investment brokers. Accordingly, the shareholders of each
company face the risk that the terms of the merger may unfairly favor the
shareholders of the other company, as measured by traditional investment banking
analysis.
9. THE POST-MERGER COMPANY PROPOSES TO TRANSACT COMMERCE ON THE INTERNET
AND WILL BE EXPOSED TO RISKS OF LOSS ASSOCIATED WITH CREDIT CARD FRAUD.
There are persons in our society that misappropriate credit card
numbers, order goods on the telephone or Internet for delivery, receive the
goods and move on before the credit card owner receives the monthly statement
for the card. Concierge currently carries no insurance to protect itself from
losses that could arise from such practices or other forms of credit card fraud
on the Internet.
10. IT IS LIKELY THAT TRADING IN OUR STOCK WILL BE VOLATILE AND LIMITED.
The OTC Bulletin Board trading in Starfest's common stock has
always been limited and volatile. During 1998 and the first two months of 1999,
Starfest conducted no business and there was virtually no trading in its stock.
The following table shows the high and low bid and asked prices, as reported by
the OTC Bulletin Board, for 1998, 1999 2000. The quotations reflect inter-dealer
prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent
actual transactions.
5
AVERAGE DAILY
HIGH LOW SHARES TRADED
---- --- ---------------
1998:
1ST QTR. 0.02 0.005 12,592
2ND QTR. 0.01 0.005 1,675
3RD QTR. 0.03 0.005 22,348
4TH QTR. 0.021 0.01 24,909
1999:
1ST QTR. 0.1000 0.0050 108,072
2ND QTR. 0.5938 0.0200 138,705
3RD QTR. 0.2000 0.0600 105,733
4TH QTR. 0.1050 0.0450 95,998
2000:
1ST QTR. 2.3125 0.075 852,552
2ND QTR. 2.9688 0.3700 215,654
3RD QTR. 0.7813 0.35 108,162
4TH QTR. 0.41 0.09375 186,584
2001:
1ST QTR. 0.195 0.08 81,219
The computer software industry, in which Concierge will operate,
is also volatile. For instance, the Computer Technology Index ("XCI") closed on
November 16, 2000 at 1,160. During the 52 weeks prior to this date, the closing
price of this index ranged from 1,078 to 1,820. The Computer Technology Index is
a widely recognized and used index. It is compiled by the American Stock
Exchange and represents a cross section of widely-held corporations involved in
various phases of the computer industry. It is market-value weighted, based on
the aggregate market value of its 27 component stocks.
11. TRADING IN THE COMMON STOCK OF THE POST-MERGER COMPANY WILL MOST
LIKELY BE SUBJECT TO THE INHIBITING EFFECTS OF THE COMMISSION'S "PENNY STOCK"
TRADING RULES.
Stocks that trade on the OTC Bulletin Board, such as Starfest's,
are subject to the Commission's Penny Stock Suitability Rule and Penny Stock
Disclosure Rule. These rules apply to OTC Bulletin Board stocks that trade at
less than $5 a share. These rules prescribe certain procedures a broker-dealer
must follow before a broker-dealer can recommend these stocks to their
customers. These procedures require that the broker-dealer -
o obtain information from the customer concerning the customer's
financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives,
o determine that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the
customer and that the customer is capable of evaluating the risks in
penny stocks,
6
o furnish the customer a written statement setting forth the basis for
the broker's determination of suitability,
o obtain from the customer a written agreement to purchase the penny
stock and the number of shares to be purchased, and
o furnish the customer with a "risk disclosure document" prescribed by
federal regulation and that describes certain risks associated with
trading in penny stocks.
These rules prevent broker recommendations of a penny stock in
many instances and may operate to delay the execution of "buy" orders of penny
stocks when they are recommended by the broker-dealers. Starfest's common stock
is a "penny stock" and may remain so for an indeterminate time after the merger
should the merger with Concierge be effected.
12. CONCIERGE HAS CONTINGENT LIABILITY OF $2,009,610 FOR POSSIBLE
VIOLATIONS OF REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND OF STATE
SECURITIES LAWS.
After Starfest filed on June 8, 2000, the registration statement
of which this Prospectus-Proxy Statement is a part, Concierge, Inc., with whom
Starfest proposes to merge, sold $142,500 worth of its common stock to eight
persons. Concierge believed that such sales were exempt from registration under
Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act") by reason of the provisions
of Section 4(2) of the Act and Regulation D, Rule 506 thereunder. It is possible
- - but not conceded by either Starfest or Concierge - that such exemptions from
registration were not available to Concierge because of the public nature of the
registration statement and also because the relationships between Concierge and
some of the purchasers in such offering may not have satisfied the requirement
of the Commission that such relationships be of a pre-existing, substantive
nature.
Should no exemption from Section 5 registration have been
available for such offering, Concierge - and Starfest, should the proposed
merger be approved and effected - as well as the persons controlling Concierge
at the time of such sales of securities could be held liable for violation of
the registration provisions of the federal and state securities laws. Further,
they could be liable not only to the purchasers of such $142,500 amount of
common stock for their purchase prices, with interest thereon, less any income
received thereon, upon the tender of their shares of common stock, or for
damages if they no longer own the securities but to all persons that bought
Concierge securities in offerings that could be "integrated" with the offering
in which the $142,500 amount of Concierge common stock was sold. Concierge
believes, but does not concede, that the maximum amount of such "integrated
sales" is $2,009,610. Such an action would have to be brought in a court within
one year after the purchase of the securities for violations of the federal
Securities Act but within two to three years after purchase of the securities
for violations of state securities laws. Most states allow, in addition to the
damages provided by federal law, a successful litigant to collect interest and
attorney fees.
7
To the extent that any such actions should be filed and
successfully litigated, Concierge's and, should the merger be approved and
effected, Starfest's operations, plans and ability to finance business
operations would be adversely affected.
13. THE POST-MERGER COMPANY IS SUBJECT TO A CONTINGENT CLAIM OF A
SHAREHOLDER FOR THE ISSUANCE TO HIM OF AN ADDITIONAL 3,961,835 SHARES OF
POST-MERGER COMMON STOCK OF THE COMPANY. SUCH A CLAIM, IF ASSERTED AND ADJUDGED
VALID, WOULD RESULT IN A 3.2 PERCENT REDUCTION IN THE EQUITY OF THE COMPANY FOR
ALL OTHER SHAREHOLDERS.
The president of Concierge unilaterally reduced the shares of
Concierge common stock of a shareholder from 60,801 shares to 2,129 shares
without the shareholder's consent and after the shareholder had agreed to reduce
his shareholdings from 75,000 shares to 60,801 shares. The law may regard the
earlier agreed reduction from 75,000 shares to 60,801 shares as a compromise and
settlement of any dispute regarding the correct number of shares owed to the
shareholder for his services. The terms of the proposed merger with Starfest
provide that each share of Concierge common stock will convert into 67.5355
shares of the post-merger company. Thus, the unilateral 58,672-share reduction
in Concierge shares for this shareholder raises the contingency that the
shareholder may be entitled to an additional 3,961,335 post-merger shares.
14. THE POST-MERGER COMPANY MAY NEED ADDITIONAL FUNDING.
Should the proposed merger be approved, the post-merger company
may require additional funding to achieve its plan of operations for the next
twelve months. Even should Concierge's operations - which will become the
operations of the post-merger company - become profitable, Concierge's
contingent liability of $2,009,610 for possible violations of the registration
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and state securities laws could
impose a future requirement for additional funding. If additional funding is
needed, whether during the next twelve months or later, the source for this
funding has not been identified or committed, and no assurance can be given that
the needed funds could be obtained. Failure to obtain the funds could result in
a contraction of future advertising, an inability to fill orders for
merchandise, a loss of sales, poor relations with business customers and
possible failure of the business. See "Information About Concierge - Concierge
Management's Plan of Operation; - Liquidity."
15. OUR SUCCESS DEPENDS ON OUR ABILITY TO RETAIN ALLEN E. KAHN AND OTHER
KEY PERSONNEL.
Should the merger occur, the post-merger company will be reliant
on the continued services of several key personnel. The loss of any of them
could adversely affect future operations. These persons are Allen E. Kahn, chief
executive officer of Concierge; and F. Patrick Flaherty, executive vice
president. Concierge has no employment agreements with any of these persons.
16. MANAGEMENT AND THEIR AFFILIATES WILL CONTROL ALL MATTERS SUBMITTED
TO SHAREHOLDER VOTES.
8
Should the merger be approved, the post-merger company's
management and their affiliates will own approximately 50.2 percent of the
company's common stock. They will be able to elect all of the directors. They
will also control all other matters submitted to the shareholders for a vote,
such as -
o potential mergers,
o increases in the authorized capital,
o the sale of all or substantially all of the company's assets, and
o the liquidation of the company.
17. ONE YEAR AFTER THE PROPOSED MERGER SHOULD BECOME EFFECTIVE, CERTAIN
TRADING RESTRICTIONS WILL BE RELAXED ON THE 50.2 PERCENT INTEREST IN THE
POST-MERGER COMPANY TO BE OWNED BY CONCIERGE'S PRESENT AFFILIATES. THIS WILL
RESULT IN A LARGE BLOCK OF STOCK BEING ELIGIBLE FOR UNLIMITED SALE INTO THE
TRADING MARKET AND COULD EXERT DOWNWARD PRESSURE ON THE PRICE OF THE STOCK.
All shareholders of Concierge will convert their shares of
Concierge common stock into shares of Starfest common stock that will have been
registered with the Commission. Despite this registration, the Commission's Rule
145 imposes trading restrictions on the post-merger shares of those persons who
are affiliates of Concierge at the time Concierge votes on the merger.
Generally, these trading restrictions are the same as those of Rule 144 and, in
particular, limit for one year the amount of shares that can be sold into the
open market by any such person during any three-month period. These restrictions
apply for one year even if such an affiliate is no longer an affiliate of the
post-merger company. To the extent any of Concierge's affiliates at the time of
the vote on the merger are no longer affiliates of the post-merger company one
year after the merger becomes effective, a large block of stock could become
eligible for unlimited sale into the trading market of the company's shares. See
"Rule 144 and Rule 145 Restrictions on Trading" on page 33.
18. THE TECHNOLOGY FOR CONCIERGE'S PRODUCT, THE PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS
ATTENDANT, IS NOT PATENTED BY CONCIERGE AND IS AVAILABLE TO COMPETITORS. STRONG
COMPETITION IS EXPECTED.
The essential speech recognition and text-to-speech technology
for Concierge's product is patented by Motorola and fonix Corp., to whom
Concierge will pay royalties and who license this technology to other companies.
19. SHOULD A CHANGE IN MANAGEMENT SEEM NECESSARY, IT WILL BE DIFFICULT
FOR THE NON-MANAGEMENT STOCKHOLDERS TO DO THIS.
9
Should the proposed merger be approved, the company's officers
and directors and their affiliates will own approximately 50.2 percent of the
common stock of the company. This amount may enable them to determine the
outcome of any vote affecting the control of the company.
TERMS OF THE TRANSACTION
MATERIAL CONDITIONS TO THE MERGER.
- --------------------------------------
Starfest and Concierge have entered into an agreement of merger between
Starfest and Concierge. For the merger to occur, each of the following must
occur:
o Registration statements must be filed with and become effective
at the Securities and Exchange Commission and appropriate state
securities regulatory agencies. This has occurred. The registration statements cover
the following:
o the 96,957,713 merger shares - the shares Starfest offers
to the stockholders of Concierge.
o The stockholders of each of Starfest and of Concierge must, by a
majority vote of the shares outstanding, approve the merger. In
this regard, the Concierge directors, officers and other
affiliates, who will be able to vote 63.6 percent of the
outstanding Concierge shares at the Concierge stockholders'
meeting, have agreed that they will vote their shares in
accordance with the outcome of the vote of the other
shareholders.
Terms of the Merger.
- ------------------------------------------
The terms of the proposed merger are as follows:
1. Concierge shall merge into Starfest.
2. AllEach share of Concierge's 1,435,655 outstanding shares of common
stock of Concierge shall be converted into 96,957,71367.5355 shares of common stock of Starfest. The
96,957,713 Starfest merger shares shall be distributed to the Concierge
shareholders on a pro-rata basis.
3. There shall be no fractional shares issued. Otherwise fractional
shares shall be rounded up or down - .01 to 4.99, down and 5 to 9.9, up.the nearest whole number.
4. The present business of Concierge shall be conducted after the merger
by Starfest, into which Concierge shall have merged. However, Concierge's
management and directors shall become the management and directors of the
combined company.
5. The articles of incorporation of Starfest will be amended to provide
the following:
o Its name will be changed to "Concierge Technologies, Inc."
10
o Its authorized capital will be increased from 65 million shares of
Common Stock, no par value, to 190 million shares of Common Stock,
$0.001 par value, and 10 million shares of Preferred Stock, $0.001
par value.
There will be approximately 120 million shares of common stock
outstanding after the merger. The board of directors will have the authority to
issue the remaining 70 million authorized but unissued shares of common stock
without shareholder approval. The issuance of all of these common shares would
result in a 58 percent dilution in the present ownership of each shareholder,
although the amount, if any, of any economic dilution to existing shareholders
would depend upon the consideration received for the issuance of the additional
shares.
Similarly, the issuance of the newly authorized 10 million shares
of preferred stock poses a potential percent dilution in book value for existing
shareholders, although the economic dilution, if any, would depend upon the
consideration received for the preferred shares.
The fact that there will be 70 million shares of common stock and
10 million shares of preferred stock available for issuance by the post-merger
board of directors has an anti-takeover impact. Any corporation or persons
considering making a tender offer for the post-merger company's shares will be
inhibited by the recognition that the issuance of these authorized but unissued
shares could increase the total cost of a tender offer and even defeat it.
The class of preferred stock that will be authorized will have no
stated or defined preferences. Rather, the board of directors will be able, by
board resolution to be filed with the Secretary of State of California, to
designate series of the preferred stock with specific preferences or attributes.
Examples of preferences or stock attributes could be -
o a series of the preferred stock could be preferred over the
common stock or other series of preferred stock in the event of
the liquidation of the company,
o a series of the preferred stock could be preferred over the
common stock in the company's declaration and payment of
dividends,
o a series of the preferred stock could be convertible into common
stock at a stated conversion price,
o a series of the preferred stock could be given the right to elect
a majority of the members of the board of directors in the event
of the non-payment of dividends to the holders of the preferred
stock, or
o combinations of the above or other preferences.
11
6. The Bylaws of the post-merger company will be the Bylaws of
Concierge. Although not a term of the merger, Concierge seeks approval of its
shareholders to amend its bylaws to increase the number of its directors to
eleven.
7. Should the stockholders of Concierge not approve the merger, neither
of Starfest or Concierge shall be liable to the other.
4
Reasons for the Merger.
- ------------------------------------------------
The Starfest stockholders will benefit by becoming, once again, an
operating company with a business. The directors of Starfest believe that the
unified messaging product of Concierge has great potential due to the increasing
number of mobile-based e-mail users both domestically and globally.
Concierge's stockholders will benefit from converting their present
stock in a closely-held corporation to stock of a corporation for which there is
a public market for their stock. TheConcierge could register its own common stock
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and then seek an NASD member firm to
apply to the OTC Bulletin Board for trading privileges for its stock.
Concierge's management feels, however, that its shareholders will benefit from
the broader shareholder base and considerably larger public float - 58,201,856
shares immediately after the merger - to be obtained from the merger with
Starfest.
Finally, the management of both Starfest and Concierge believe that the
existence of such a public market will facilitate the raising of expansion funds for
the post-merger company. We giveThere is no assurance that such will occur.
Effectively, the stockholders of Concierge will suffer a 19.2 percent
dilution in their equity in Concierge solely for the perceived, but not assured,
benefits of having a public market for their securities.
Description of Securities.
- -----------------------------------------------------
Common Stock. Starfest is a California corporation, and Concierge is a
Nevada corporation. Starfest is authorized to issue 65 million shares of common
stock. It has 23 million shares of common stock now issued and outstanding.
Concierge is authorized to issue 10 million shares of common stock. It has
1,376,3801,435,655 shares of its common stock now issued and outstanding. There are no
material differences in the common stock of our two companies.
Voting rights. Stockholders have one vote a share on all matters
submitted to a vote of the stockholders. Shares of common stock do not have
cumulative voting rights. This means that the holders of a majority of the
shares voting for the election of the board of directors canare able to elect all
members of the board of directors.
Dividend rights. Stockholders receive dividends when and if
declared by the board of directors out of funds of the corporation legally
available therefor.
12
Liquidation rights. Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding
up, stockholders receive pro rata all of the assets of the corporation available
for distribution to stockholders, subject to the prior satisfaction of the
liquidation rights of the holders of outstanding shares of preferred stock.
Preemptive rights. Stockholders do not have preemptive rights to
subscribe for or purchase any stock, obligations or other securities of the
corporation.
Registrar and transfer agent. Nevada Agency and Trust Company,
50 West Liberty Street, Suite 880, Reno, Nevada 89501, is the transfer agent and
registrar of the common stock of Starfest. Concierge serves as its own
registrar and transfer agent.
Dissenters' rights. A stockholder has "dissenters' rights" which,
if properly exercised, may require the corporation to repurchase its shares.
Dissenters' rights commonly arise in extraordinary transactions such as mergers,
consolidations, reorganizations, 5
substantial asset sales, liquidating
distributions, and certain amendments to the corporation's certificate of
incorporation.
Change in Control. There are no provisions in the articles of
incorporation or bylaws that would delay, defer or prevent a change in control
of either Starfest or Concierge.
Preferred Stock. The post-merger company will be authorized to issue 10
million shares of preferred stock. The preferred stock may be issued from time
to time by the directors as shares of one or more series. The description of
shares of each series of preferred stock, including any preferences, conversion
and other rights, voting powers, and conditions of redemption must be set forth
in resolutions adopted by the directors.
There are no presently outstanding shares of preferred stock of
Starfest.
Differences Between Rights of Stockholders of Starfest and of Concierge.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are noseveral material differences between the rights of holders of the
common stockbylaws of Starfest
and of Concierge. The bylaws of Concierge will become the bylaws of the
surviving company. The material differences are -
o A Concierge bylaw provides that special meetings of the shareholders can
be called at the request of 25 percent of the shares then outstanding. A
Starfest bylaw designates 10 percent of the shares then outstanding for
this same purpose.
o A Concierge bylaw provides that there shall be five directors. A
Starfest bylaw designates not less than four nor more than five
directors. At the special meeting of Concierge shareholders called to
approve or disapprove the proposed merger with Starfest, the Concierge
shareholders will also consider a proposal of its directors to increase
to eleven the number of its directors.
13
o A Concierge bylaw provides that special meetings of the directors can be
called on one day's actual notice by any director or the president. A
Starfest bylaw provides that special directors' meetings can be called
on two-days' actual notice by two directors, the president, any vice
president or the secretary.
o A Concierge bylaw provides that any director may be removed for cause by
action of the board of directors. No Starfest bylaw provides for removal
of directors by the board of directors.
o A Concierge bylaw provides that any director, officer or employee shall
be indemnified by the company against the reasonable expenses incurred
in the defense of any proceeding brought against him by reason of his
being a director, officer or employee except in instances where he
actually is adjudged to be liable for gross negligence or misconduct in
the performance of his duties. A Starfest bylaw authorizes
indemnification but limits obligatory indemnification to instances where
an agent of the company has been successful on the merits in defense of
any such proceeding.
Accounting Treatment of Proposed Merger.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The transaction will be accounted for as a recapitalizationreverse acquisition - that
is, the acquisition of Concierge.Starfest by Concierge as Concierge will have the
controlling votes of the combined entities.
Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Transaction.
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Merger. The merger shouldwill qualify as a type "A" tax free
reorganization for both corporations under Section 368(a)(1) of the Internal
Revenue Code.
Stockholders of Concierge. There shouldwill be no recognition of
taxable gain or loss to the stockholders of Concierge by reason of the merger.
Each stockholder of Concierge wouldwill have a carryover tax basis and a tacked
holding period for the Starfest securities received in the merger.
Concierge itself wouldwill not recognize any taxable gain or loss,
because its liabilities are not in excess of the tax basis of its assets.
The above discussion is not based upon an advance ruling by the
Treasury Department but upon an opinion of Thomas J. Kenan, esquire, in his
capacity as tax counsel to Starfest (which tax opinion is one of the exhibits to
the registration statement of which this Prospectus- ProxyProspectus-Proxy Statement is a part).
Mr. Kenan's opinion is based upon U.S. federal income tax law, including
legislation, regulations, administrative rulings and court decisions.
14
Agreement of Merger.
- -----------------------------------------
The Agreement of Merger between Starfest and Concierge appears herein as
"Appendix A - Agreement of Merger."
6
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following sets forth certain pro forma financial information giving
effectIn addition to the merger:terms of the merger described earlier under "Terms of
the Transaction - Terms of the Merger," the Agreement of Merger contains the
following principal provisions:
Representations by Starfest. Starfest makes representations to
Concierge in regard to -
o its good standing in California and in each state where it is
required to obtain authorization to transact business,
o its right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into the
Agreement of Merger and to perform its obligations under the
agreement,
o the validity of all documents, instruments and certificates
delivered pursuant to the agreement's terms,
o the consummation of the merger not resulting in a breach or
violation by it of its corporate charter or any agreements to
which it is a party,
o the accuracy of its financial statements,
o the non-existence of any person's right to acquire capital stock
of Starfest other than as disclosed in the agreement,
o the disclosure of all material liabilities of it not reflected on
the financial statements,
o the disclosure of any material claims against it,
o the filing by it of all tax returns required to be filed by it,
o its compliance with all federal, state or local laws and
ordinances,
o the non-existence of any employee pension benefit plan,
o its non-infringement of any patents, trademarks, service marks or
trade names,
o the non-existence of any collective bargaining agreement,
o the legality of its earlier issuance of unrestricted shares
pursuant to Regulation D, Section 504.
15
Representations by Concierge. Concierge makes the same
representations to Starfest as those described above that Starfest makes to
Concierge.
Conditions Precedent to Starfest's Obligation to Consummate the Merger. The
obligation of Starfest to consummate the merger is subject to its satisfaction
that the following conditions have been met:
o Concierge shall have performed all of the following covenants,
conditions and obligations required of it to be performed by the
closing date:
o Concierge will have filed all income, franchise, property,
sales, employment and other tax returns required of it by
any taxing authority and will have paid or accrued all
taxes required to be paid by it,
o there shall be no undisclosed claims against Concierge or
affecting its business and no undisclosed pending or
threatened proceedings or governmental investigations
involving Concierge, its assets or its business,
o Concierge shall have obtained all permits or other
authorizations necessary for the conduct of its business
and shall not be in violation of any such permit or other
authorization,
o all parties to all material contracts to which Concierge
is a party are in compliance in all material respects with
the terms of the contracts, and
o Concierge has never infringed any patents, trademarks,
service marks or trade names used by it in its business
nor has it claimed any such infringement.
o all representations made by Concierge shall be materially true,
correct and complete,
o prior to closing the merger, Concierge shall have suffered no
material adverse change affecting it or sustained any loss that
materially affects its ability to conduct its business,
o there shall be no pending legal proceeding seeking to restrain or
prohibit or to obtain damages or other relief in connection with
the merger,
o a majority of the Starfest shareholders shall have approved
o the merger,
o the change of name of Starfest to "Concierge Technologies,
Inc."
16
o the change of management to that of Concierge's
management, and
o an increase in the authorized capital to 190 million
shares of common stock and 10 million shares of preferred
stock,
o Concierge shall have obtained any consents necessary to perform
its obligations under the Agreement of Merger, and
o Starfest shall have obtained all required approvals under the
securities laws to issue the merger shares to Concierge's
shareholders.
Conditions Precedent to Concierge's Obligation to Consummate the Merger. The
obligation of Concierge to consummate the merger is subject to its satisfaction
that Starfest has met the same conditions as those listed above and imposed on
Concierge that are conditions precedent to Starfest's obligation to consummate
the merger.
The Closing. At the closing of the merger transaction, the following shall
occur:
o each party shall deliver to the other party certificates of good
standing from the states where each is required to be qualified
to do business,
o each company's secretary shall deliver to the other company a
secretary's certificate certifying that all necessary corporate
action has taken place to approve the merger,
o Starfest shall deliver the necessary documents needed to be filed
with the Secretaries of State of California and Nevada to effect
the merger, and the officers of the two companies shall execute
the documents and deliver them for filing to the Secretaries of
State, and
o Concierge shall deliver to Starfest a list of Concierge
shareholders, certified by Concierge's secretary, setting forth
the names, addresses and number of shares of Starfest each is to
receive in the merger, and Starfest shall send the list to
Starfest's stock transfer agent with instructions to issue the
96,957,713 merger shares to the Concierge shareholders in
accordance with the list.
Termination of the Agreement of Merger. The agreement may be terminated prior to
closing by either party if any one or more of the conditions to its obligation
to close have not been fulfilled, or by mutual agreement of the parties.
Survival of Representations and Indemnification. The representations of the
parties to the agreement shall survive the closing for two years. Each party
indemnifies the other party against its loss arising from breaches of
representations, but only if the losses exceed $10,000 and the total
indemnification obligation shall not exceed $200,000.
17
Post-Closing Covenants. The post-merger company shall not reverse split its
stock for at least two years without the written consent of Gary Bryant of
Indian Wells, California, who will represent the interests of the present
Starfest shareholders. Mr. Bryant is the record owner of 1,310,000 shares of
Starfest common stock and will receive an additional 143,783 shares of its
common stock, through his ownership of 2,129 shares of Concierge common stock,
should the merger be approved. Mr. Bryant's shareholdings represent 5.7 percent
of Starfest's presently outstanding shares and 0.15 percent of Concierge's
presently outstanding shares. Should the merger be approved, he will own 1.3
percent of the outstanding shares of the post-merger company. He will be the
owner of the largest number of shares of the post-merger company of any present
Starfest shareholder. For this reason, he was chosen by the Starfest directors
to represent the interests of the present Starfest shareholders in regard to
possible reverse stock splits that might be proposed by the post-merger
directors.
18
PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
DecemberOPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS (INTERIM PERIOD) ENDED MARCH 31, 19992001
(UNAUDITED)
The following unaudited Pro Forma Statements have been derived from the
Unaudited financial statements of Starfest, Inc. (A) for the nine months ended
March 31, 2001 and the unaudited financial statements of Concierge, Inc. (B)
for the nine months ended March 31, 2001. The unaudited Pro Forma Statement
of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements
of A, the Financial Statements of B and the Notes to the financial statements.
The Pro Forma Statement of Operations does not purport to represent what the
Company's results of operations would actually have been if the acquisition of A
had occurred on the date indicated or to project the company's results
of operations for any future period or date. The Pro Forma adjustments, as
described in the accompanying data, are based on available information and
the assumption set forth in the foot notes below, which management believes
are reasonable
Starfest Inc. Concierge
Inc. Inc. Pro Forma Pro Forma
(Historical) (Historical) AdjustmentsAdjustment Combined
------------ --------------------------- ---------------- ------------------ ----------- ---------
ASSETS
Current assets $ 481 $ 77,183 $ - $ 77,664
Property and equipment - 4,612 - 4,612
------- -------- ------ -------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 481 $ 81,795 $ - $ 82,276
======== ======== ====== =======
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities $ 17,687 $ 105,805 $ - $123,492
Long term liabilities - - - -
------- -------- ------ -------
Total liabilities $ 17,687 105,805 - $123,492
------- -------- ------ -------
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock 2,639,651 10,800 - 2,650,451
Additional paid-in capital - 491,508 - 491,508
Retained earning (deficit) (2,656,857) (526,318) - (3,183,175)
--------- ------- ----- ---------
Total stockholders' equity (17,206) (24,010) - (41,216)
--------- ------- ----- ---------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND $ 481 $ 81,795 $ - $ 82,276
======== ======== ===== =======
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Pro forma book value per share $(0.0003)
=======
NOTE: Pro forma book value per share is calculated by dividing Total
stockholders' Equity - $(41,216) - by the total number of shares that
would have been outstanding on December 31, 1999 (119,957,712), giving
effect to the proposed merger.
7
PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF INCOME
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 1999
Starfest Concierge
Inc. Inc. Pro Forma Pro Forma
(Historical) (Historical) Adjustments Combined
------------ ------------ ----------- ---------
Sales $. . . . . . . . . - $ - $ - $ -
Cost of Sales . . . . . . - - - -
------- ------- -------- -------------------- ---------------- -------------- -----------
Gross profit -profit. . . . . - - -
Operating expenses 518,606 54,775expenses. . . . 61,446 526,665 - 573,381
------- ------- -------- -------588,111
-------------- ---------------- -------------- -----------
Loss from operations (518,606) (54,775)operations. . . (61,446) (526,665) - (573,381)
Income (loss) before taxes (518,606) (54,775) - (573,381)
--------- ------- ------- -------(588,111)
Provision for taxes . . . - 800 - 800
--------- ------- ------- --------------------- ---------------- -------------- ----------
NET INCOME (LOSS) $(518,606) (55,575). . . $ (61,446) $ (527,465) $ - (574,181)
======== ======= ======= =======$ (588,911)
=============== ================ ============== ===========
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net income (loss) $(518,606) $ (55,575) $ - $ (574,181)
Weighted-averageWeighted -average
number of shares
outstanding 21,697,999 1,076,575 - 22,774,574
(Loss). . . . . 23,000,000 96,957,713 8,056,250(3) 128,013,963
=============== ================ ===========
Loss per share $(0.02) $(0.05) - $(0.03). . . $ (0.003) $ (0.005) $ $ (0.005)
=============== ================ ============== ===========
NOTES:
(1) Earnings per share data shown above are applicable for both primary and
fully diluted.
(2) Weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the combined entity
includes all shares issued as of December 31, 1999June 30, 2000 as if outstanding as of
the beginning of the period.
8(3) Weighted average number of shares outstanding for combined entity includes
22,914,637 shares of Starfest, Inc., 96,957,713 shares to be issued
to the shareholders of Concierge, Inc., 5,928,750 shares to be issued in
lieu of advance subscription received by Concierge, Inc. at June 30, 2000
and 2,127,500 shares for advance subscription received from July 1, 2000
through March 31, 2001.
19
PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
(UNAUDITED)
The following unaudited Pro Forma Statements have been derived from the
Unaudited financial statements of Starfest, Inc. (A) for the year ended June 30,
2000 and the audited financial statements of Concierge, Inc. (B) for the year
ended June 30, 2000. The unaudited Pro Forma Statements of Operations and
financial conditions reflects the acquisition of A (a reporting company) by
B (a previously non public company) in a reverse merger using purchase method of
accounting and assumes that such acquisition was consummated as of July 1, 1999.
The merger transaction is considered to be a capital transaction (i.e. issuance
of stock by Starfest, Inc accompanied by a recapitalization).
The unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Operations and financial conditions should
be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements of A, the Financial
Statements of B and the Notes to the financial statements. The Pro Forma
Statement of Operations does not purport to represent what the Company's
results of operations would actually have been if the acquisition of A had
occurred on the date indicated or to project the company's results of
operations for any future period or date. The Pro Forma adjustments, as
described in the accompanying data, are based on available information and
the assumption set forth in the foot notes below, which management believes
are reasonable.
Starfest Inc. Concierge Inc. Pro Forma Pro Forma
(Historical) (Historical) Adjustment Combined
--------------- ---------------- ------------------ ------------
Sales . . . . .. . . . $ - $ - $ - $ -
Cost of Sales .. . . . - - - -
--------------- ---------------- -------------- ------------
Gross profit. . . - - - -
Operating expenses . . 675,738 986,186 - 1,661,924
--------------- ---------------- -------------- ------------
Loss from operations. (675,738) (986,186) - (1,661,924)
Provision for taxes . 800 800 - 1,600
--------------- ---------------- -------------- ------------
NET INCOME (LOSS) . . $ (676,538) $ (986,986) $ - $(1,663,524)
=============== ================ ============== ============
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Weighted -average
number of shares
outstanding 22,914,637 96,957,713 8,056,250(3) 127,928,600
=============== ================ ===========
Loss per share . .. $ (0.03) $ (0.01) $ $ (0.01)
=============== ================ ============== ===========
NOTES:
(1) Earnings per share data shown above are applicable for both primary and
fully diluted.
(2) Weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the combined entity
includes all shares issued as of June 30, 2000 as if outstanding as of
the beginning of the period.
(3) Weighted average number of shares outstanding for combined entity includes
22,914,637 shares of Starfest, Inc., 96,957,713 shares to be issued
to the shareholders of Concierge, Inc., 5,928,750 shares to be issued in
lieu of advance subscription received by Concierge, Inc. at June 30, 2000
and 2,127,500 shares for advance subscription received from July 1, 2000
through September 15, 2000.
20
PRO FORMA STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS
AS OF JUNE 30, 2000
(UNAUDITED)
Starfest Inc. Concierge Inc. Pro Forma Pro Forma
(Historical) (Historical) Adjustment Combined
--------------- ---------------- ------------ ------------
ASSETS
Current Assets.. . . . . . $ 1,105 $ 430,905 $ (100,000)(1) $ 332,010
Property & equipment, net - 4,692 - 4,692
-------------- --------------- ----------- ------------
TOTAL ASSETS. . . . . . . $ 1,105 $ 435,597 $ (100,000) 336,702
============== =============== =========== ============
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities . . . . $ 363,546 $ 143,155 $ (100,000)(1) $ 406,701
Long term liabilities . . - - - -
--------------- ---------------- ------------ ------------
Total liabilities . . 363,546 143,155 (100,000) 406,701
--------------- ---------------- ------------ ------------
Stockholders' equity;
Common stock. . . . . . 2,711,751 13,764 (13,764)(2) 2,814,638
96,958 (3)
5,929 (4)
Additional paid-in capital. - 560,617 13,764 (2) 0
(96,958)(3)
1,169,861 (4)
(3,009,794)(5)
1,362,510 (6)
Advance subscription. . . . . . . - 1,175,790 (1,175,790)(4) 0
Retained earnings (deficit) . (3,074,192) (1,457,729) 3,009,794 (5) (2,884,637)
(1,362,510)(6)
--------------- ----------- ---------- ------------
Total stockholders'
equity . .(362,441) 292,442 0 (69,999)
--------------- ---------------- ------------ ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY. . . . $ 1,105 $ 435,597 $ (100,000) 336,702
=============== ================ ============ ============
NOTES;
(1) Elimination of inter-company loan upon merger
(2) Elimination of Common stock of Concierge, Inc. before merger
(3) Issuance of 96,957,713 shares of Common stock of $.001 par value to
shareholders of Concierge, Inc.
(4) Conversion of advance subscription to 5,928,750 shares capital of the
merged Company
(5) Elimination of pre-merger retained earnings of Starfest, Inc.
(6) Elimination of negative balance in Additional Paid-in-Capital
21
MATERIAL CONTACTS BETWEEN STARFEST AND CONCIERGE
BACKGROUND OF THE TRANSACTION.
- ---------------------------------
1. During the fall of 1999, Allen Kahn, the president of Concierge, had
several conversations concerning the development of Concierge's unified
messaging product with an old acquaintance, Patrick Flaherty, then the western
regional manager for Flynn & Associates, a computer mainframe software publisher
and vendor. In early December 1999 Mr. Flaherty introduced Mr. Kahn to John
Everding, a self-employed person whose primary occupation is raising capital in
California for private companies. On occasion he does so with the assistance of
Gary Bryant and Mr. Bryant's financial consulting company, Newport Capital
Consultants, Inc. The purpose of the introduction and telephone conversations
among Kahn, Flaherty, Everding and Bryant was to explore whether Mr. Everding
could assist Concierge in raising working capital and product development
capital for the company. Also discussed was the possibility of effecting a
"reverse merger" between Concierge and a public company in order to obtain a
security that trades in the stock market, which the group believed would assist
any capital-raising efforts.
2. On December 6, 1999, at the initiation of John Everding and Gary Bryant,
a meeting was held in Irvine, California in the offices of Grant Bettingen
Company, an NASD broker-dealer firm. Mr. Bettingen did not participate in the
meeting. His role was limited to providing a conveniently situated conference
room for the meeting, in response to Gary Bryant's request for the use of the
room. Attending the meeting were John Everding, Gary Bryant, and three
representatives of Concierge - Allen Kahn, Patrick Flaherty and James Kirk,
Concierge's general counsel and corporate secretary.
3. The subjects discussed at the meeting were a merger between Concierge and
Starfest proposed by John Everding and Gary Bryant, the business plans of
Concierge as revealed by Allen Kahn and Patrick Flaherty, Starfest's history as
revealed by Gary Bryant, how the equity of such a post-merger company would be
allocated between the shareholders of Starfest and Concierge and how Gary Bryant
and John Everding would be compensated if such a merger should occur. Mr.
Bryant proposed that the equity of the post-merger company be allocated in the
manner set forth in this Prospectus-Proxy Statement. Allen Kahn and Patrick
Flaherty indicated that they would seek the approval of the Concierge directors
to the merger and to this allocation. On December 8, 1999 Concierge's board of
directors approved of the merger in principle and directed Mr. Kahn to proceed
to the drafting of a merger agreement and its execution.
4. The subject of compensation to Gary Bryant and John Everding was deferred
to a later date. Grant Bettingen asked for no compensation for providing a
meeting place for the December 6, 1999 meeting, and he is to receive no
compensation. Gary Bryant asked to be compensated for bringing Starfest to the
proposed transaction. John Everding asked to be compensated for assisting
Concierge in locating prospective investors in Concierge.
22
The directors of Concierge and Starfest each met and approved the
proposed merger and its terms. An agreement of merger was drafted by Starfest's
counsel and was executed on January 26, 2000 by the officers of Starfest and
Concierge. No joint meeting of the directors of the two companies was ever held.
Newport Capital Consultants has no relationship with Concierge other
than as described in this Prospectus - Proxy Statement as a consultant and
finder who is being compensated for advising Concierge's management on matters
involving mergers and for bringing to Concierge the proposed merger with
Starfest and the acquisition in early March 2000 of a reporting shell
corporation, MAS Acquisition XX Corp.
Matters Concerning Compensation for Consultants.
- ---------------- -------------------------------
The matter of compensation to be paid to Gary Bryant and John Everding
was raised several times in telephone conversations with Allen Kahn initiated by
either John Everding or Gary Bryant. Mr. Bryant asked that he be paid $25,000 in
December 1999, be paid an additional $25,000 when the merger with Starfest
should be effected, and be issued 150,000 shares of common stock upon completion
of the merger. Mr. Everding asked that he be paid a consulting fee for a period
of two years - $9,500 a month from December 1999 until the merger is effected
and $12,500 a month for the balance of the two years, that he be reimbursed
out-of-pocket expenses incurred on behalf of Concierge, and that he be issued
75,000 shares of common stock. Mr. Kahn initially agreed to these requests for
compensation, but it soon became clear that the parties were miscommunicating
concerning the number of shares involved in the requests. Mr. Bryant and Mr.
Everding understood the 150,000 shares and 75,000 shares each, respectively, was
to receive would be shares of Concierge common stock and would be converted in
the merger to shares of the post-merger company at whatever conversion ratio
would apply for such conversion. Mr. Kahn understood that the 150,000 shares and
75,000 shares would be the number of post-merger shares Mr. Bryant and Mr.
Everding, respectively, would receive.
Finally, on May 5, 2000 the directors of Concierge agreed to a
compromise proposed by Gary Bryant and John Everding - 75,000 shares of
pre-merger common stock of Concierge to Gary Bryant - which would convert into
5,186,183 shares of post-merger Starfest common stock - and 37,500 shares of
pre-merger Concierge common stock to John Everding - which will convert into
2,593,091 shares of post-merger Starfest common stock. The 75,000 shares of
Concierge common stock that were issued to Gary Bryant were valued by
Concierge's directors at $24,000, the book value of the shares when they were
issued. The 37,500 shares of Concierge common stock that were issued to John
Everding were valued by Concierge's directors at $12,000, the book value of the
shares when they were issued. Subsequently, on September 12, 2000, Mr. Bryant
contributed to Concierge 14,199 of his 75,000 shares, thereby reducing to 60,801
the number of shares of Concierge common stock he owned. These 60,801 shares
would convert into 4,105,618 shares of the post-merger company should the merger
be approved.
23
However, in April 2001, Allen Kahn, the president of Concierge,
determined that Mr. Bryant should not receive such a large number of shares on
the ground that the original agreement between Concierge and Mr. Bryant was
clear in its intention that Mr. Bryant receive 150,000 shares of Concierge
common stock calculated after the merger with Starfest, not before the merger.
Mr. Kahn unilaterally reduced Mr. Bryant's shareholdings of Concierge stock from
60,801 shares to 2,129 shares, a difference to Mr. Bryant of 3,961,835 shares of
post-merger stock and a reduction that Mr. Bryant has not agreed to.
Accordingly, Mr. Bryant could possibly assert a claim against Concierge after
the merger over the issuance to him of an additional 3,961,835 shares of common
stock of the post-merger company - an amount equal to 3.3 percent of the
119,957,713 shares to be outstanding after the merger should be effected and a
reduction of 3.2 percent in the equity of each of the other shareholders of the
post-merger company should such a claim be made and established by Mr. Bryant.
There areis no past, present,provision for delayed vesting of the issued shares,
repurchase rights or other mechanisms whereby Concierge may recover its fee paid
to Bryant and Everding in the event the proposed material contracts,
arrangements, undertakings, relationships, negotiationstransaction with Starfest is
not approved by the shareholders of either company.
The 14,199 shares of Concierge stock contributed in May 2000 by Mr.
Bryant to Concierge were reissued by Concierge on September 12, 2000 to nine
purchasers of "advance subscriptions" securities of Concierge for a cash
consideration of $210,000. Mr. Bryant received no consideration for his
contribution to Concierge of the 14,199 shares of Concierge stock or transactionsfor the
reduction in April 2001 from 60,801 shares to 2,129 shares that Mr. Kahn
unilaterally effected. As of the date of this Prospectus - Proxy Statement, Mr.
Bryant has received from Concierge $25,000 in cash and the reduced amount of
2,129 shares of Concierge common stock. He anticipates receiving an additional
$25,000 from Concierge when the merger with Starfest should occur.
Through March 1, 2001, Concierge has paid $243,630 to John Everding and
issued him 37,500 shares of Concierge common stock. The cash payments represent
a $9,500 a month consulting fee, reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, and an
additional $82,630 as an advance payment against future monthly consulting fees,
which advance payment Mr. Everding requested with regard to a recurring illness
associated with his having been in contact with Agent Orange during the periodsVietnam
conflict. Assuming the merger with Starfest had been effected on March 1, 2001,
Mr. Everding's monthly consulting fees for which financial statements are presented between Concierge or
its affiliates and Starfest or its affiliates other than the provision intwo-year period to end December
1, 2001 would amount to $254,000 plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.
Starfest's Acquisition of an S.E.C. Reporting Company.
- ------------------------------------------------------------
At the time the agreement of merger was executed on January 26, 2000,
Starfest's common stock was traded through the OTC Bulletin Board. However, it
was subject to delisting if Starfest did not register its common stock with the
Securities and Exchange Commission by April 2000 and become a "reporting
company" - a company obligated to file periodic reports with the Commission.
Starfest's counsel, who was drafting the registration statement for the merger,
advised the officers of Starfest and of Concierge, Gary Bryant and John Everding
that the registration statement would not be able to be filed and processed by
the Commission's staff prior to the April 2000 deadline and that it therefore
faced delisting from the OTC Bulletin Board.
24
In early March 2000 Gary Bryant advised Michael Huemmer, the president
of Starfest; Allen Kahn, the president of Concierge; and Thomas Kenan,
Starfest's counsel who was drafting the registration statement for the merger
shares, that he had been advised by a friend, Jim Stubler of Capistrano Beach,
California that a certain Aaron Tsai of Evansville, Indiana, had registered with
the Commission at least twenty startup, no-operations, shell corporations for
the purpose of enabling companies, such as Starfest, can designate one memberthat were facing delisting
from the Bulletin Board, to take advantage of the boardCommission's Rule 12g(3). This
rule provides, generally, that a corporation that acquires a reporting
corporation, by purchase, merger or otherwise, also acquires the legal
obligation to file periodic reports with the Commission for the combined
companies. Mr. Bryant stated that one of directorsthese reporting shell corporations of
Mr. Tsai, a company named MAS Acquisition XX Corp., was available for purchase
by Starfest for $100,000 cash and 150,000 shares of common stock of Starfest.
This consideration was to be divided between Mr. Tsai and Mr. Stubler in some
proportion known only to them.
The acquisition by Starfest of Mr. Tsai's 96.83 percent of the
outstanding shares of MAS Acquisition XX Corp. would enable Starfest to become a
reporting company upon filing a proper Form 8-K with the Commission to serve immediately afterreport
the acquisition. This would avoid Starfest's delisting from the OTC Bulletin
Board. Mr. Bryant maintained that such a delisting would result in Starfest's
common stock being reduced to trading through the Pink Sheets, a trading medium
inferior to that of the Bulletin Board, and that such would almost inevitably
result in a lower market value of Starfest's common stock. He argued that the
likelihood of obtaining approval of the merger untilby Concierge's shareholders would
be lessened if Starfest were a "Pink Sheet company," that the next
annual meetingpayment of 150,000
shares of Starfest and $100,000 cash was justified when measured against the
approximately 120 million shares to be outstanding of the stockholders.
Such designeepost-merger company
should the merger occur and the lost time and costs of processing the proposed
merger to a vote of shareholders that would vote against the proposed merger
because of the Pink Sheet status of Starfest.
Mr. Bryant's arguments were accepted by the management of Starfest and
Concierge. Starfest did not have $100,000 to pay to Mr. Tsai and Mr. Stubler and
could not issue any additional common stock by reason of its merger agreement
with Concierge. Concierge loaned the $100,000 to Starfest, and Starfest's
president, Michael Huemmer, contributed the 150,000 shares of Starfest common
stock needed for the transaction. Starfest's counsel drafted an acquisition
agreement, which agreement was executed on March 6, 2000. The required
consideration was paid and delivered, and on March 10, 2000 Starfest filed a
Form 8-K12G3 with the Commission reporting its acquisition of 96.83 percent of
the outstanding shares of common stock of MAS Acquisition XX Corp. and
Starfest's assumption of the obligation to file future reports with the
Commission. Starfest was not delisted from the OTC Bulletin Board.
25
As stated, the $100,000 cash portion of the consideration paid to
acquire MAS Acquisition XX Corp. was loaned to Starfest by Concierge. This loan
is John Conners.carried on Starfest's balance sheet as a "related party note payable." It is
payable on demand and is interest-free. Should the merger occur, the obligor and
the obligee of the loan will have merged into the same person, an event which
will extinguish the obligation. Should the merger not occur, Starfest will
owe Concierge $100,000 on demand.
Other than having an interest in the proposed merger by reason of (1)
his or her ownership of common stock of Starfest or Concierge or (2) election to
office of the surviving company, there is no substantial interest in the merger,
direct or indirect, of any Starfest or Concierge director or executive officer
since the beginning of the last fiscal year, nominee for election as a director
or associate of any of the foregoing persons.
INTERESTS OF NAMED EXPERTS AND COUNSEL
Thomas J. Kenan, Esquire, counsel to Starfest, is named in this
Prospectus-Proxy Statement as having given an opinion on legal matters
concerning the registration or offering of the securities described herein. From
February 17, 1999 until April 6, 1999, Mr. Kenan was the sole officer and
director of Starfest. Mr. Kenan's spouse, Marilyn C. Kenan, is the trustee and
sole beneficiary of the Marilyn C. Kenan Trust, a testamentary trust that
presently owns 760,000 shares of common stock of Starfest. Mr. Kenan disclaims
any beneficial ownership in the securities beneficially owned by his spouse's
trust. Mr. Kenan owns, in his own name, 600,000 shares of common stock of
Starfest and 2,840 shares of common stock of Concierge which shares of Concierge
he received as compensation for his legal services and counsel in connection
with the negotiation and preparation of the agreement of merger, his legal
services in the negotiation and drafting of a Stock Purchase Agreement dated
March 6, 2000 with the controlling shareholder of MAS Acquisition XX Corp. and
Mr. Kenan's subsequent drafting of a Form 8-K12G3 filed with the Commission on
March 10, 2000, his drafting of Starfest's annual Form 10-KSB, and the drafting
of the registration statement of which this Prospectus-Proxy Statement is a
part.
26
INDEMNIFICATION
Starfest, a California corporation, will be the surviving corporation to
the merger. Under California and Nevada corporation law, a corporation is authorized to
indemnify officers, directors, employees and agents who are parties or
threatened to be made parties to any civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative suit or proceeding by reason of the fact that they are or were a
director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation or are or were acting in
the same capacity for another entity at the request of the corporation. Such
indemnification includes reasonable expenses (including attorneys' fees),
judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement if they acted in good faith and
in a manner reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of
the corporation.
With respect to any criminal action or proceeding, these same
indemnification authorizations apply if these persons had no reasonable cause to
believe their conduct was unlawful.
In the case of any action by the corporation against such persons
involving a breach of duty to the corporation is authorizedor its shareholders, California
law authorizes the corporation to provide similar indemnification but only if any-
o the articles of incorporation authorize such, persons should be adjudged to be liable for negligence or
misconduct in the
performance of duties to the corporation,o the court
9
conducting the proceeding must determinedetermines that such persons
are nevertheless fairly and reasonably entitled to
indemnification. Starfest's articles of incorporation do not
authorize such indemnification for acts of directors and officers
involving a breach of duty to the corporation or its
shareholders.
To the extent any such persons are successful on the merits in defense
of any such action, suit or proceeding, California and Nevada law provideprovides that they shall
be indemnified against reasonable expenses, including attorney fees. A
corporation is authorized to advance anticipated expenses for such suits or
proceedings upon an undertaking by the person to whom such advance is made to
repay such advances if it is ultimately determined that such person is not
entitled to be indemnified by the corporation.
Indemnification and payment of expenses provided by California and
Nevada law are
not deemed exclusive of any other rights by which an officer, director, employee
or agent may seek indemnification or payment of expenses or may be entitled to
under any by-law, agreement, or vote of stockholders or disinterested directors.
In such regard, a California and Nevada corporation may purchase and maintain liability
insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or
agent of the corporation.
27
As a result of such corporation law, Starfest or Conciergethe post-merger company may, at
some future time, be legally obligated to pay judgments (including amounts paid
in settlement) and expenses in regard to civil or criminal suits or proceedings
brought against one or more of itsthe officers, directors, employees or agents, as
such, of either of the two pre-merger companies with respect to matters
involving the proposed merger or, should the merger be effected, matters that
occurred prior to or after the merger.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities
Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of
the company pursuant to the foregoing provisions or otherwise, the company has
been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of
1933 and is, therefore, unenforceable.
PENNY STOCK REGULATIONS
There is no way to predict a price range within which Starfest's common
stock would trade after the proposed merger. It presently trades on the OTC
Bulletin Board at a price less than $5 a share and is subject to the rules
governing "penny stocks."
A "penny stock" is any stock that:
o sells for less than $5 a share.
o is not listed on an exchange or authorized for quotation on The
Nasdaq Stock Market, and
o is not a stock of a "substantial issuer." Starfest is not now a
"substantial issuer" and cannot become one until it has net
tangible assets of at least $2 million, which it does not now
10
have and will not have solely as a result of the proposed merger
with Concierge.
There are statutes and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Commission") that impose a strict regimen on brokers that
recommend penny stocks.
The Penny Stock Suitability Rule
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Before a broker-dealer can recommend and sell a penny stock to a new
customer who is not an institutional accredited investor, the broker-dealer must
obtain from the customer information concerning the person's financial
situation, investment experience and investment objectives. Then, the
broker-dealer must "reasonably determine" (1) that transactions in penny stocks
are suitable for the person and (2) that the person, or his advisor, is capable
of evaluating the risks in penny stocks.
After making this determination, the broker-dealer must furnish the
customer with a written statement setting forth the basis for this suitability
determination. The customer must sign and date a copy of the written statement
and return it to the broker-dealer.
28
Finally the broker-dealer must also obtain from the customer a written
agreement to purchase the penny stock, identifying the stock and the number of
shares to be purchased.
The above exercise delays a proposed transaction. It causes many
broker-dealer firms to adopt a policy of not allowing their representatives to
recommend penny stocks to their customers.
The Penny stock Suitability Rule, described above, and the Penny Stock
Disclosure Rule, described below, do not apply to the following:
o transactions not recommended by the broker-dealer,
o sales to institutional accredited investors,
o sales to "established customers"transactions in which the customer is a director, officer,
general partner, or direct or indirect beneficial owner of more
than 5 percent of any class of equity security of the broker-dealer persons who
either have had an account withissuer of
the broker-dealer for at least a
year or who have effected three purchasespenny stock that is the subject of penny stocks with
the broker-dealer on three different days involving three
different issuers,transaction, and
o transactions in penny stocks by broker-dealers whose income from
penny stock activities does not exceed five percent of their
total income during certain defined periods.
The Penny Stock Disclosure Rule
------------------------------------------------------------------
Another Commission rule - the Penny stock Disclosure Rule - requires a
broker-dealer, who recommends the sale of a penny stock to a customer in a
transaction not exempt from the suitability rule described above, to furnish the
customer with a "risk disclosure document." This document includesis set forth in a
descriptionfederal regulation and contains the following information:
o A statement that penny stocks can be very risky, that investors
often cannot sell a penny stock back to the dealer that sold them
the stock,
o A warning that salespersons of penny stocks are not impartial
advisers but are paid to sell the stock,
o The statement that federal law requires the salesperson to tell
the potential investor in a penny stock -
o the "offer" and the "bid" on the stock, and
o the compensation the salesperson and his firm will receive
for the trade,
29
o An explanation that the offer price and the bid price are the
wholesale prices at which dealers are willing to sell and buy the
stock from other dealers, and that in its trade with a customer
the dealer may add a retail charge to these wholesale prices,
o A warning that a large spread between the bid and the offer price
can make the resale of the stock very costly,
o Telephone numbers a person can call if he or she is a victim of
fraud,
o Admonitions -
o to use caution when investing in penny stock market and how it
11
functions, its inadequacies and shortcomings,stocks,
o to understand the risky nature of penny stocks,
o to know the brokerage firm and the risks associatedsalespeople with investments inwhom
one is dealing, and
o to be cautious if ones salesperson leaves the penny stock market. The broker-dealer must also disclose the
stock's bid and ask price information and the dealer's and salesperson's
compensation related to the proposed transaction.firm.
Finally, the customer must be furnished with a monthly statement including
prescribed information relating to market and price information concerning the
penny stocks held in the customer's account.
Effects of the Rule
-----------------------------------------
The above penny stock regulatory scheme is a response by the Congress
and the Commission to known abuses in the telemarketing of low-priced securities
by "boiler shop" operators. The scheme imposes market impediments on the sale
and trading of penny stocks. It has a limiting effect on a stockholder's ability
to resell a penny stock.
Starfest's merger shares likely will trade below $5 a share on the OTC
Bulletin Board and be, for some time at least, shares of a "penny stock" subject
to the trading market impediments described above.
INFORMATION ABOUT STARFEST, INC.
Business Development
Starfest, Inc. was incorporated in California on August 18, 1993 as
"Fanfest, Inc." On August 29, 1995 its name was changed to Starfest, Inc.
Pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") dated
March 6, 2000 between (1) MAS Capital, Inc., an Indiana corporation, the
controlling shareholder of MAS Acquisition XX Corp. ("MAS XX"), an Indiana
corporation, and (2) Starfest, approximately 96.83 percent (8,250,000 shares) of
the outstanding shares of common stock of MAS Acquisition XX Corp. were
exchanged for $100,000 and 150,000 shares of common stock of Starfest in a
transaction in which Starfest became the parent corporation of MAS XX.
30
At the time of this transaction, the market price of Starfest's common
stock was $1.50 bid at closing on March 7, 2000 on the OTC Bulletin Board.
Accordingly, the consideration Starfest paid for the 96.83 percent interest was
valued at $325,000. Concierge loaned to Starfest the $100,000 cash portion of
the consideration evidenced by a no-interest, demand note. Michael Huemmer, the
president of Starfest, loaned to Starfest the 150,000 shares of common stock of
Starfest that was the stock portion of the consideration.
Upon execution of the Purchase Agreement and the subsequent delivery of
$100,000 cash and 150,000 shares of common stock of Starfest on March 7, 2000,
to MAS Capital Inc., pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) of the General Rules and
Regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Starfest became the
successor issuer to MAS Acquisition XX Corp. for reporting purposes under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and elected to report under the Act
effective March 7, 2000.
MAS Acquisition XX had no business, no assets, and no liabilities at the
time of the transaction. Starfest entered into the transaction solely for the
purpose of becoming the successor issuer to MAS Acquisition XX Corp. for
reporting purposes under the 1934 Exchange Act. Prior to this transaction,
Starfest was preparing to register its common stock with the Commission in order
to avoid being delisted by the OTC Bulletin Board. By engaging in the Rule
12g-3(a) transaction, Starfest avoided the possibility that its planned
registration statement with the Commission would not be fully reviewed by the
Commission's staff before an April 2000 deadline, which would result in
Starfest's common stock being delisted on the OTC Bulletin Board.
Business of Starfest.
- -------------------------------------------
Starfest's initial business was the production and promotion of theme
events involving numerous artists and performers and designed to attract mass
audiences of fans drawn by the theme. In 1994 and 1995 it produced "Fanfest,"
which was held at the Fairplex at the Los Angeles County Fairgrounds, and which
won the Airplay International Award as the "Country Music Event of the Year." In
1995 the event won the Country Music Associations of America's award as the
"Best Country Event of the 12
Year." The two events lost money, however. By the end
of 1995, Starfest had a retained deficit of $1,228,703.
In 1996 the event was renamed "Starfest" and was again held in Los
Angeles. The events all lost money. In 1997 the event was planned but was cancelled before being held. At
the end of 1997, Starfest had no business and a retained deficit of $2,135,885.
The company was essentially dormant in 1998, losing only $2,366 for the year,
with its activities being limited to dealing with creditors and to attempting to
raise capital for the resumption of business.
31
In 1999, with no business, Starfest turned controlthe management of the company
over to three individuals involved in the adult Internet entertainment business.business - Billy
Harbour, John Whitley and Pamela Miller of southwestern Virginia. Under this new
direction the company bought three websites found on the Internet through- www.starfest.com,
----------------
with the front-page title of adultstars.com.www.adultstar.com and www.adultstars.com. Starfest also purchased and paid
$12,000 for twelve additional websites on the Internet, but the written transfer
of the websites was never obtained, and the right to obtain the transfer of
those websites has been sold and transferred to unrelated third parties.
Stockholders owning a majority of the outstanding stock of Starfest regained
control of the management of the company by obtaining the resignations of
directors associated with the Virginia management and onhaving the remaining
directors elect Michael Huemmer as president and Janet Alexander as secretary of
the company. On December 31, 1999, pursuant to the written consent of persons
holding a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of the company,
Starfest sold all the remaining assets of the company associated with the adult
entertainment business for $10,000$10,000. The assets consisted of the three adult
entertainment websites and the right to obtain the additional twelve websites.
Starfest applied this and its other cash assets to the payment of outstanding
liabilities. Starfest suffered a loss of $518,606 for the year of 1999.
On January 18, 2000, Starfest and Concierge executed a letter of intent
to submit to their stockholders a proposal to merge. The agreement of merger was
executed on January 26, 2000. Starfest will be the surviving corporation of the
merger, but the business and management of the merged companies will be that of
Concierge. Pending approval of the merger, Starfest has no business.
Starfest has no employees. Starfest's present management consists of two
persons, Michael Huemmer, president, and Janet Alexander, secretary.
Plan of Operation
- -------------------
Starfest's sole plan of operation at present is to progress toward a
closing of the proposed merger with Concierge. Should the merger be consummated,
the company's plan of operation for the next twelve months shall then be the
plan of operation that Concierge's management has for its company.
Until the merger should be consummated or abandoned, Starfest has no
paid employees. Its officers and directors are contributing their time without
compensation. Starfest no longer has sufficient cash to meet anticipated cash
requirements that will arise before the merger with Concierge is consummated.
Until the shareholders of the two companies can vote on the proposed merger,
Starfest's president, Michael Huemmer, and legal counsel, Thomas J. Kenan, are
advancing the costs associated with registering the merger transaction shares
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Should the merger with Concierge not be consummated, Starfest's
management will seek another merger partner Starfest will find it necessary to
raise additional funds in connection with any other merger it might negotiate
with another merger partner. It would propose to require the other party to the
merger to provide such funds.
32
Description of Property.
- -------------------------------------------------
Starfest has no property.
Legal Proceedings.
- ------------------------------------
Neither Starfest nor its property is a party to, or the subject of,
pending legal proceedings. Starfest is aware of no proceeding that a
governmental authority is contemplating.
Market for Starfest's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Starfest's Common Stockcommon stock presently trades on the OTC Bulletin Board.
TheInformation on the high and low bid and asked prices as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board, are as
follows for Starfest's common stock during
1997, 1998, and 1999 and 2000 appears in Risk Factor No. 10 on page 5. The
volatility of the firststock price is apparent, not only from year-to-year but within
each quarter. The volume of trading in the stock is also highly volatile. From
the third quarter of 2000. The quotations reflect
inter-dealer prices,1997 until the second quarter of 1999, there was
practically no trading in the stock. Weeks could pass without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissiona single
transaction. Then, during the second and may not
represent actual transactions.
13
High Low
---- ---
1998:
1st Qtr. 0.02 0.005
2nd Qtr. 0.01 0.005
3rd Qtr. 0.03 0.005
4th Qtr. 0.021 0.01
1999:
1st Qtr. 0.1000 0.0050
2nd Qtr. 0.5938 0.0200
3rd Qtr. 0.2000 0.0600
4th Qtr. 0.1050 0.0450
2000:
1st Qtr. 2.3125 0.075
third quarters of 1999 almost daily
trading recommenced based upon Starfest's public announcements that it was
entering the adult Internet entertainment business. Trading slowed to almost a
stop with the lack of results of this new business venture. Then, in January
2000 the trading volume surged with the announcement of the proposed merger with
Concierge. Daily volumes since late January 2000 are quite erratic. In March
2000, for instance, daily volume ranged from 3,110,300 to 172,500.
There are approximately 96 record holders of Starfest's common stock.
Some 19,013,657 of its shares are held in the single name of "Cede & Co.," which
is the record holder for shares held in numerous brokerage accounts.
Rule 144 and Rule 145 Restrictions on Trading.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Should the merger with Concierge be approved and effected, all shares of
common stock of the post-merger company issued in the merger to the stockholders
of Concierge shall have been issued pursuant to registration with the
Commission. Nevertheless, there will be certain restrictions on the transfer for
value of somethe shares received in the merger by the affiliates of the shares.Concierge, who
may be deemed to be underwriters.
Securities and Exchange Commission rules define as "affiliates" a
corporation's executive officers, directors and other persons who, by any
manner, exercise control over the corporation's direction and policies. The
affiliates of Concierge at the time of the vote on the merger, in order to sell
their shares received in the merger, must either register them for saleresale or
comply with the resale provisions set forth in paragraph (d) of the Commission's
Rule 145, unless some other exemption-from-registration provision is available.
The resale provisions of paragraph (d) of Rule 145 refer to certain provisions
of the Commission's Rule 144 and require, for sales of the shares by such
affiliates, that:
33
o the company must have been subject to the reporting
requirements of Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act for at least 90 days (which is the
case, here),
o the company must have filed all reports with the
Commission required by such rule during the twelve months
preceding such sale (or such shorter period that the
company was required to file such reports),
o transfers for value by such affiliates can occur only
either (1) through broker transactions not involving the
solicitation of buyers or (2) directly to market-makers,
and
o each such affiliate can transfer for value, during a
90-
day90-day period, no more shares than the greater of one
percent of all issued and outstanding shares of common
stock of the company (105.8 million(119,957,713 shares immediately after
the merger) or the average weekly volume of trading
14
in
such common stock reported through the automated quotation
system of Nasdaq or the Bulletin Board during the four
calendar weeks prior to placing the sell order with a
broker-dealer.
The above resale provisions of Rule 145 shall continue for such
affiliates for one year after the merger. Then, only the company's reporting
requirement shall continue. When any such affiliate has ceased to be an
affiliate of the post-merger company for at least three months, and provided at
least two years have elapsed since the date of the merger, then even the
requirement that the company file reports with the Commission will no longer be
required for such a former affiliate to sell any of the shares acquired in the
merger.
WeThe following table allocates the post-merger company's common stock
between restricted and non-restricted stock for Concierge's and Starfest's
affiliates at Starfest believe that 3.5 million sharesthe time of the presently
outstanding 23 millionmerger:
34
Percent of No. of Shares Restricted
Post-Merger Company No. of Shares Total Issued by Rules 144 and 145
------------------- ------------- ------------ ------------------------
Authorized shares 190,000,000 - -
Issued and outstanding shares 119,957,713 100.0 60,353,856
----------- ----- -----------
Issued and outstanding shares Rule 145:
To be controlled by
Concierge's affiliates 60,189,663 50.2 60,189,663
Issued and outstanding shares Rule 144:
To be controlled by
Starfest's affiliates 860,000 0.7 860,000
35
Pre-merger restricted shares
Of Starfest issued during
2000 to persons other than Rule 144:
its affiliates 1,402,001 1.2 1,402,001
Shares in the "public float,"
subject to no restrictions
on trading 57,506,049 47.9 -
----------- ----- ----------
119,957,713 100.0 60,353,856
The 860,000 shares controlled by Starfest's affiliates were issued in
2000 and will continue to be "restricted" shares until they have been held for
two years. The same is true of the 1,402,001 other shares of Starfest willissued in
2000. After such shares have been held for one year, they may be subjectsold pursuant
to restrictionsthe provisions of Rule 144, the principal ones of which are set forth above
on trading or transfers for value after the merger. We also believe that of the
96,957,713 shares of Starfest to be distributedpage 27 as "bullet points" in the merger to Concierge
stockholders, only the 64,437,240 shares to be distributed to Concierge'
officers, directors and affiliates will be subject to any restrictions on
transfer. Accordingly, after the effective datesecond paragraph of the merger, there shall be
55,520,473 shares in the "public float," i.e., subject to no securities law
restrictions on their being traded or transferred for value. We estimate that
approximately 140 persons will own these shares of record. The offering of them
for sale could have a materially adverse effect on the market price of the
company's stock. Further, the affiliates of Concierge will hold 64,437,240
shares and will be able to sell these shares pursuant to Rule 144 and Rule 145
of the Securities Act.this heading.
No equity of Starfest is subject to outstanding options or warrants to
purchase, or securities convertible into, equity of the company.
Dividends. Starfest has had no operations or earnings and has declared no dividends
on our capital stock. Should you approveConcierge has never earned a profit and may not do so in
the merger, there are no
restrictions that would, or are likely to, limit the ability of Starfest tofuture. Under California law, a company - such as our post-merger company -
can pay dividends only
o from retained earnings, or
o if after the dividend is made,
o its tangible assets would equal at least 11/4 times its
liabilities, and
o its current assets would at least equal its current
liabilities, or
--
o if the average of its earnings before income taxes and
before interest expenses for the last two years was less
than the average of its interest expenses for the last two
years, then its current assets must be equal to at least
11/4 times its current liabilities.
The post-merger directors' strategy on its common stock, but it has no plansdividends is to declare and pay
dividends only from retained earnings and when the directors deem it prudent and
in the foreseeable futurebest interests of the company to declare and intends to use earnings for business expansion purposes.pay dividends.
Reports to Stockholders. Starfest is required to file reports with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. These reports are annual 10- KSB,10-KSB, quarterly
10-QSB and periodic 8-K reports.reports, although none of such filed reports are
incorporated herein by reference. Starfest will furnish stockholders with annual
reports containing financial statements audited by independent public or
certified accountants and such other periodic reports as we may deem appropriate
or as required by law.
35
Registration Statement. Starfest has filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC") in Washington, D.C., a Registration Statement under
the Securities Act of 1933, with respect to the common stock offered by this
Prospectus-Proxy Statement. The public may read and copy any materials we file
with the SEC at the Public Reference Room of the SEC at 450 Fifth Street, N.W.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of
the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Starfest is an
electronic 15
filer, and the SEC maintains an Internet Web site that contains
reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding
issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of such site is
http://www.sec.gov.
Stock Certificates. Certificates for the securities offered hereby will
be ready for delivery within one week after you approve the merger.
Financial Statements.
- ------------------------------------------
See "Financial Statements - Starfest, Inc." for the independent auditor's report
dated March 21, 2001, with respect to Starfest's balance sheet as of December
31, 2000 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and
cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2000, and the independent auditor's
report dated February 9, 2000, with respect to Starfest's balance sheet as of
December 31, 1999, andAnd the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1999 and
December 31, 1998, and the notes to such financial statements.statements, except with
respect to Note 4, as to which the date is March 7, 2000, as well as the interim
(unaudited) balance sheet at March 31, 2001, statement of operations and
accumulated deficit, and statement of cash flows for the three months periods
ended March 31, 2001 and March 31, 2000.
Management's Plan of Operation.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Should the stockholders of the two companies not approve the merger,
Starfest will seek another partner. Its sole "asset" is its status as a public
company whose stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board.
Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosures.
- -----------
On March 8, 2000 Starfest's principal independent accountant, Jaak
(Jack) Olesk, Beverly Hills, California, resigned. His reports on the Company's
financial statements from inception onward contained no adverse opinions or
disclaimers of opinions and were not modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or
accounting principles. There were no disagreements with Jaak (Jack) Olesk,
whether or not resolved, on any matter of accounting principles or practices,
financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not
resolved to Jaak (Jack) Olesk's satisfaction, would have caused him to make
reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with his
reports.
The registrant has not yet36
On November 14, 2000, the Company engaged the firm of Kabani & Company,
of Fountain Valley, California, as independent accountants for the Company.
Prior to November 14, 2000, neither the Company, nor anyone on its behalf, had
consulted with Kabani & Company concerning the accounting principles of any
specific completed or contemplated transaction, any type of audit opinion on the
Company's financial statements or any other material factor which might be
considered by the Company in reaching a new independent accountantdecision as to any accounting, auditing
or principal accountant to audit its financial statements.reporting issue.
37
INFORMATION ABOUT CONCIERGE, INC.
Overview
Concierge was incorporated in Nevada on September 20, 1996, inwith the
State of
Nevada. Its principal office isbusiness purpose to develop personal computer software designed to read an
Internet e-mail user's e-mail messages to one over any wirelined telephonic
connection. The user may call ones computer from any telephone to initiate the
transaction. The software may also be configured by the user to automatically
call one at 6033 West Century Boulevard, Suite 1278, Los
Angeles, California 90045. Itsany telephone number when new e-mail is 310- 216-6334.
16
received from any e-mail
address entered on the user-defined "VIP list." The concept uses voice
recognition technology to allow the user to direct the interaction by voice
command. Concierge devoted almost all its efforts to the development of a usable
product, the Personal Communications Attendant ("PCA(TM)"), which was finally
completed in September, 2000. It may be purchased through the company's Web
sites at http://www.pcahome.com and http://www.conciergetech.com. As presently
constituted, the PCA is a single-user product and has a list purchase price of
$39.95. The company anticipates future sales to individual end-users, large user
groups and re-sellers and is pursuing potential opportunities in all those
channels.
Concierge's Plan of Operation
- -------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge commenced marketing the PCATM in September 2000. It had
expected to bring the PCATM to market in early April, announced this expectation
in an interview on a television program and set up a toll-free line with
contract personnel available to take telephone orders. Approximately 50 orders
were received. Unfortunately, Concierge's initial marketing effort was
precipitous. The company Concierge had hired to write the programming code to
implement Concierge's design, technical specifications and program logic did not
timely meet its contractual commitments. The product was not ready. The initial
marketing effort was terminated.
On May 12, 2000 the responsibility for writing the programming code was
reassigned to Dave Cook Consulting of Mercer Island, Washington. That company's
work was overseen by Concierge. Detailed technical development of the initial
PCATM product, packaging design, documentation, field testing and attendant
tasks were completed, and the PCATM became available for direct purchase online
in September 2000.
Full scale marketing efforts have not yet commenced. Concierge has
developedplaced evaluation units of the PCA(TM) with a "unified messaging" product -number of major end-user and
reseller organizations for their assessment of the Personal
Communications Attendant ("PCA"). It commencedproduct's suitability for
their purposes. Technical problems in automatic credit card verification and
funds transfer have been resolved. The company is positioned to ship ordered
units expeditiously. Aggressive sales and marketing campaigns are planned but
are being held in abeyance pending the generation of additional funding.
38
Two hundred units were shipped between September, 2000 and January 15,
2001. Of these, only a small number were sold to individual end-users.
Approximately 120 units were sent as evaluation copies to large corporate users
and re-sellers to stimulate demand in situations representing high volume
potential. Such technical evaluations were arranged by Concierge or
intermediaries; no unsolicited evaluation units have been sent. Product
evaluations of this productnature by major organizations tend to be time-consuming, and
there is no guarantee of success. Product inventory is not maintained on company
premises but was recently moved from XeTel Corp. in April 2000.San Ramon, CA to Point to
Point, LLC in Mill Valley, CA from which location order fulfillment services
will be performed. Current inventory, all pre-paid, consists of 14,800 packages,
14,800 printed User's Guides and 1,800 CDs containing the PCA software itself.
Description of the PCATM.PCA(TM). Concierge's PCATMPCA(TM) provides a means by
which any user of Internet e-mail can have e-mail messages spoken to him or her
over any touch-tone telephone or wireless phone in the world.
The PCATMPCA(TM) responds to the user's voice commands to read, verbalize and
manage e-mail traffic stored on a personal computer. The PCATMPCA(TM) is "trained"
to respond only to the voice commands and personal voice password of the
individual user, thus guaranteeing that each user's personal messages cannot be
accessed by anyone else. Responding to spoken instructions, the PCATMPCA(TM) can
verbalize e-mail (with future fax and voice-mail capabilities) over the phone
and save or delete those messages as directed by the user.
The Market. AsPCA(TM) software executes on a personal computer operating under
Windows 95 or Windows 98 and using Microsoft Outlook or Outlook Express as an
e-mail client. It requires 350 megabytes of early 1999, we estimate there were over 250 million
e-mail users worldwide,available hard disk space. The
Internet connection may be effected by any standard means, including dial-up or
dedicated telephone line, cable or DSL, but voice interaction between the user
and the PCATM software requires a numberdial-up phone line and a voice-capable modem.
Generally, although not invariably, many available 56 KB modems are
voice-capable. The initial product being offered for sale is a stand-alone,
single-user version and is not designed to function in a LAN or WAN environment.
There are no set-up costs associated with the product other than assuring that
the minimum hardware and software requirements are present.
The initial product can verbalize only a user's e-mail. It is, however,
implemented with "hooks" for the addition of fax and voice-mail modules. "Hooks"
means that the programs have been written to facilitate the future inclusion of
additional features such as fax and voice-mail capabilities. The date of
availability of these features will depend upon decisions still to be made by
Concierge management regarding the assignment of priorities to product
introduction. Among future products planned are the "Pro" version, which will
enable the user to access by telephone the user's fax and voice-mail messages; a
multi-user, server-based version for corporate/enterprise users; and various
"nationalized", that is, growing rapidly. As tonon-English, versions. An assessment of individual
market segments and other considerations will enter into the domestic
market, last year there were more than 40 million e-mail users in the U.S.
churning out more than 150 million messages a day. By 2003 that could reach more
than 200 million users, creating 7 billion messages a day. A substantial
majority of this group are potential usersdecision of
Concierge's current productsmanagement as to how its available resources might best be utilized.
Expansion of the initial product's capabilities to add fax and products planned for future release.
Distribution Methods. Concierge plans an aggressive, direct-mail and
Internet-marketing campaign to introduce and promotevoice-mail
retrieval capabilities will not be a major effort; however, it may or may not be
the PCATM.
Production Costs. The PCATM will be manufactured and produced for
Concierge by Xetel Corp. A service order fulfillment contract is being
negotiated at this time with an unaffiliated third party corporation. Emerald
Solutions, Inc. will provide project management, software and program design and
program coding services to implement products designed by Concierge.best application of Concierge's capabilities from a strategic marketing
standpoint.
39
The e-mail version will retail at $39.95. With a $19.95 upgrade, the
planned pro version monitorswill monitor and collectscollect fax, voice mail and e-mail
messages. A user's personal computer will then become a universal communications
center. All the user's incoming communications, be they fax, voice- or e-mail,
will reside on the user's own computer and will be readily accessible from any
telephone.
There will be no monthly service fee.fee - only the one-time purchase price
and the option of buying upgrades. No device other than an ordinary telephone is
needed to access the PCA(TM).PCATM. The PCATM also includes an auto pager that notifies
the user by phone or pager when new e-mail is received.
Considering direct product costs includingThe underlying technology is the subject of patents, and Concierge is
required to pay royalties of $0.425 a delivered PCATM unit to Lexicus, a
subsidiary of Motorola, for its Clamor Automatic Speech Recognition software and
$1.00 a delivered unit to fonix for its text-to-speech software. Concierge projects
a gross profit margin of approximately 80has
paid advance royalties to 90 percent of direct sales.Lexicus for 100,000 units and advance royalties to
fonix for 200,000 units.
Concierge intends to "nationalize" the product to accommodate several
foreign languages, possibly including Japanese, Korean, German, Latin American
Spanish, French and Brazilian Portuguese. fonix has advised Concierge that its
text-to-speech software will be available in up to seven foreign languages
commencing in the first quarter of 2001. "Nationalizing" the PCATM will also
require the translation of PCA-generated voice prompts, packaging for the
product and preparation of the user documentation. The voice recognition
component of the PCA is "language independent" and requires no revision - once
trained by the user, it accepts any sound as signifying any corresponding
instruction provided the sound is uttered consistently and in context.
Concierge anticipates that it will complete the first nationalization of
the PCA(TM) within 45 days after it receives from fonix the nationalized
text-to-speech development materials.
The Market. In a study published May 12, 2000 and entitled
"Communications Software and Services," Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette reported on
the past, present and future estimated users of the Internet. Referring for its
information to the International Data Corporation, a research and analysis
organization in the information technology field, DLJ reported the following
estimates of Internet users:
40
In Millions
-----------
No. of Users Internet
-------------- --------
U.S.A.:
End of 1998 30
End of 2002 67
Global:
End of 1999 196
End of 2003 503
Every Internet user with access to a standard telephone is a potential
buyer of Concierge's PCA(TM).
In a February 2000 research report on "unified messaging,"
Jurisdoctor-LLC.com described a burgeoning cottage industry seeking to integrate
access to e-mail, voice mail, pager messaging and fax mail boxes through PC
desktops, screenphones, and voice/touch-tone telephones. Based on digital
technology and automated voice recognition technology that translates spoken
words into text format that can be edited by a common word processor, unified
messaging systems are being developed by a number of companies. The Gartner
Group, a Massachusetts-based market research firm, predicts that unified
messaging will become a $6.6 billion market this year.
Competition.
------------
In August 1999 Lucent Technologies announced that it was entering the
unified messaging field and proposes to provide to Internet service providers
and to businesses a solution to bring together into a single system a company's
complete voice mail, e-mail and fax capabilities.
USWest is in the field with a unified messaging system that permits the
user to access e-mail, fax and voice messages from ones telephone or PC. It is
called "VoiceWire(TM)", and USWest markets it for $27.90 a month. Among other
entrants in the field are Jfax.com, which offers a unified messaging system at
$12.50 a month plus a $15 activation fee; Premiere Technologies, whose system is
offered at $9.95 a month plus fifteen cents a minute for phone access; and
General Magic, whose Portico system is offered at $19.95 a month and a $50 setup
fee.
Concierge believes that it has positioned itself, with its one-time
$39.95 purchase price for its PCA(TM) with no monthly fees, to compete in a
growing market segment.
Distribution Methods. Concierge's marketing methods will include direct,
high-volume, e-mail advertising promulgated on the Internet. Lists of e-mail
addresses are readily available for purchase. Such lists typically contain from
millions to tens of millions of valid e-mail addresses. The lists may cost from
a few hundred dollars to one or two thousand dollars, depending upon the
specificity of the target audience.
41
In the case of Concierge's PCA(TM) product, any e-mail user who
communicates in English and has a need to retrieve e-mail messages while away
from his or her personal computer may legitimately be considered a prospect. The
lists to be utilized by Concierge will be unfiltered lists, generally restricted
geographically to English-speaking North America. Concierge has elected not to
use its in-house server capacity to perform the actual bulk mailings but will
employ an outside service for this function. Both list sources and mailing
services advertise extensively on the Internet and can also be easily identified
through any comprehensive search engine such as www.dogpile.com.
In addition to direct e-mail Internet marketing, Concierge's marketing
plan includes the cultivation of Internet Service Providers (ISPs) as a sales
channel for the PCA(TM). Under discussion are strategic alliances to provide
PCAs with personal computer systems and sales through direct marketing
organizations. Concierge has participated and will continue to participate, in
radio and television business-oriented shows designed to expose companies and
their products to a mass audience. Approximately 50 percent of Concierge's
present resources will be allocated to advertising, marketing and product
promotion.
Production Costs. The PCA(TM) will be manufactured and produced for
Concierge by XeTel Corp. and Point To Point LLC of Mill Valley, CA. A service
order fulfillment contract has been executed with eAssist.com of San Diego,
California, an unaffiliated third party corporation. Dave Cook Consulting of
Mercer Island, Washington will provide product development services to implement
products designed by Concierge.
Manufacturing Services Agreements. XeTel Corporation of Austin,
Texas will manufacture large orders of the PCA(TM) software for Concierge at its
San Ramon, California plant and ship them F.O.B. San Ramon at Concierge's
direction. Because XeTel is not equipped to deal with small-volume shipments,
Concierge's existing finished goods inventory was moved - at Xetel's request -
to Point To Point in December of 2000 for future limited-quantity product runs
and order fulfillment. Should the volume of shipments exceed Point to Point's
capacity at some future date, Concierge can move production and order
fulfillment functions back to XeTel under the terms of their original agreement.
Alternative sources for these services have also been identified and may be
considered in the future.
Under Concierge's agreement with XeTel, Concierge furnishes to
XeTel the design of the PCA(TM) and a twelve-month forecast of sales. They then
negotiate the unit price to be charged Concierge during such period based on the
forecast. Concierge also furnishes to XeTel an approved list of vendors for all
component parts of the PCA(TM).
The first four months of the twelve-month forecast must be firm
purchase orders. Each month the twelve-month forecast is updated, as are the
four months of purchase orders.
Should the actual orders fall short of those forecast for a
twelve-month period for which a price was negotiated, Concierge is subject to
XeTel's supplier billbacks. As of October 15, 2000, Concierge had prepaid
$49,890 to XeTel for PCAs(TM) to be manufactured for Concierge. Concierge also
had in its inventory at that date 2,000 PCAs(TM) manufactured for it by XeTel
and paid for.
42
XeTel warrants the products for 90 days after it ships them.
Should a product be defective because of Concierge's design, Concierge still
must pay XeTel the full purchase price for the product. Should a product be
defective because of XeTel's workmanship or material furnished by XeTel, XeTel
will replace the goods at its expense if the goods are returned to it within 30
days after XeTel's 90-day warranty period.
Either party can terminate the agreement for its convenience on
180 days' notice or for cause on 30 days' notice.
Concierge's agreement with Point To Point, for limited-quantity
product runs and order fulfillment, is for Point To Point's services at its
prevailing rates. Quoted rates bind Point To Point for only 30 days.
Customer Relations. Concierge provides its technical support and
customer relations on its website at http://pcahome.com and
http://www.conciergetch.com under "techsupport" and "faq." Also, a user of
Concierge's PCA(TM) in need of technical assistance may contact Concierge by an
e-mail message stating the problem and receive a reply by e-mail.
43
Product Development Agreement. Dave Cook Consulting of Mercer
Island, Washington earlier provided product development consulting services to
Concierge. Payment for the services was based upon hourly charges.
After a previous consultant hired to perform program coding
implementation of Concierge's design of the PCATM failed to perform as required
by March 22, 2000, Concierge hired Dave Cook Consulting to perform the work.
Dave Cook Consulting restructured the fundamental systems architecture of the
PCATM, rewrote the basic programming code of major modules of the software
package, and revised the user interface.
Mr. Cook, together with Lisa Monte of Creative Web Works,
recommended major changes that were made in Concierge's web site
(www.pcahome.com) and helped equip the site to handle on-line entry order,
credit card verification and order fulfillment.
The intellectual property rights associated with the work product
of Dave Cook Consulting are owned by Concierge.
The March 17, 2000 agreement with Dave Cook Consulting expired
after one year. At such time as Concierge should obtain the capital for
additional product development, it proposes to negotiate a new agreement with
Dave Cook Consulting.
Governmental Approval of Principal Products. No governmental approval
is required in the U.S. for Concierge's products.
17
Government Regulations. There are no governmental regulations in the
U.S. that apply to Concierge's products.
Properties. Concierge subleasesleases approximately 1501,100 square feet of office
space at Suite 1278, 6033 West Century Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90045.
The lease is a one-year lease that expires June 1, 2001. The space is deemed
adequate for the present time, but additional space will be
needed commencing in April 2000. Concierge has not yet identified the additional
space it will lease, but ampletime. Ample space is available for any needed expansion
in the vicinity of its present space and elsewhere in the Los Angeles area.
Dependence on Major Customers and Suppliers. Concierge does not
anticipate that it will be dependent on any major customers or suppliers.
44
Seasonality. There should be no seasonal aspect to Concierge's business
other than possible increased sales anticipated in the fourth calendar quarter
associated with the year-end holidays.
Research and Development. Concierge expended approximately $188,663 on
research and development in 1998 and $50,431 in 1999. It anticipates that it
will expend approximately $150,000 on research and development in 2000 and
approximately $200,000 in 2001.
Environmental Controls. Concierge is subject to no environmental
controls or restrictions that require the outlay of capital or the obtaining of
a permit in order to engage in business operations.
Year 2000 Computer Problem. Concierge has determined that it does not
face material costs, problems or uncertainties about the year 2000 computer
problem. This problem stems from the fact that many existing computer programs
use only two digits to identify a year in the date field and do not consider the
impact of the year 2000. Concierge presently uses off-the-shelf and easily
replaceable software programs and has determined that all software is year 2000
compliant.
Number of Employees. On March 1, 200031, 2001 Concierge employed two persons
full time and two persons part time.
Venue of Sales. Concierge anticipates that some of its initial sales
will be attributable to exports to English-speaking countries.
Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights and Intellectual Property. Concierge
has trademarked its Personal Communications Attendant. It has no patents on the
product; the underlying technology is the subject of patents, and Concierge is
required to pay royalties of $0.85 a PCATM unit to Lexicus, a subsidiary of
Motorola, and $1.00 a unit to Fonix.product.
Legal Proceedings. Neither Concierge nor any of its property is a party
to, or the subject of, any material pending legal proceedings other than
ordinary, routine litigation incidental to its business.
18
Concierge Management's Plan of Operation
- ----------------------------------------
Concierge commenced marketing its Personal Communications Attendant on
April 7, 2000.--------------------------------------------
Concierge's management proposes to devote the company's cash assets and
the time and efforts of its officers and staff for the next twelve months to the
promotion, sale and continued improvement of its Personal Communications
Attendant.
Liquidity. As of April 15,December 31, 2000, Concierge had cash assets of $3,356
plus prepaid expenses of $245,800 in prepaid royalties and $49,890 in prepaid
finished goods inventory Of 2000 copies of the compact disk containing the
PCA(TM) software that were in inventory on November 15, 2000, less than 100 had
been sold by January 15, 2001. While approximately $550,000 acquired through120 units have been sent as
evaluation copies to large corporate users and resellers who had agreed to
evaluate the product, the product evaluations are still not concluded.
Significant orders for the PCA(TM) can be fulfilled, as Concierge has on hand
14,800 of the packages and user manuals, and the 13,000 copies of the compact
disk needed to complete the 14,800 units for sale can be obtained at a cost to
Concierge of a maximum of $32,500. It is felt that the production of the
additional 13,000 CDs can be accomplished for substantially less than the
$32,500 figure quoted by XeTel.
45
Concierge is illiquid. It is now operating at a monthly administrative
overhead of approximately $20,000. Of this figure, a substantial portion
represents salaries due full-time employees and payments made to part-time
employees. These parties have all agreed to defer such payments until such time
as the company is in a position to meet said obligations. Concierge requires
advertising funds to create a demand for its product. It is seeking debt
financing from several private sources that have had past business relations
with directors of Concierge. One of these sources has asked that Mr. Kahn,
president of Concierge, pledge a portion of his Concierge stock holdings to the
repayment of any loan to Concierge the source might provide.
Mr. Kahn has agreed to do so.
Short term, Concierge requires approximately $190,000 for an aggressive
sales and marketing campaign and $60,000 for its general and administrative
overhead for the next three months. Long term, Concierge requires an additional
$180,000 just for general and administrative overhead to complete the next
twelve months. It is anticipated that ongoing requirements may be satisfied from
cash flow generated by product sales expected to result when the company's
product promotion plans are implemented. The $430,000 cash requirements
described in this paragraph for the next twelve months would require the sale of
approximately 10,763, or 73 percent, of the 14,800 PCA(TM) units now in
inventory.
Concierge has no sources of liquidity other than the persons and
entities from whom it is now seeking debt financing. While Mr. Kahn has agreed
to secure a loan to the company with his Concierge stock holdings, such action
may be insufficient to obtain the loan.
The only asset Concierge has is its PCA(TM) product. Should debt
financing not be obtained soon, the directors of Concierge propose to seek a
joint venture partner with whom the PCA(TM) can be jointly marketed and who will
bear the expenses of marketing the product. Discussions are currently underway
with prospective joint venture partners.
46
Risk Factor No. 12 on page 7 of this Prospectus describes Concierge's
contingent liability of $2,009,610 for possible violations of the stock
registration requirements of federal and state securities laws. The occasion of
the contingent liability was Concierge's sale of $142,500 of its common stock
in an
offering exemptafter the June 8, 2000 filing of the registration statement of which this
Prospectus is a part. Concierge does not concede that no exemption from
registration pursuantwas available, but the contingency exists that the purchasers of
all shares of Concierge common stock from December 9, 1998 to the provisionspresent - some
$2,009,610 in amount - could seek - and might prevail in seeking - rescissions
of their purchases of stock and a return of their purchase amounts plus interest
and attorney fees. Should a demand for rescission be made by the Commission's
Regulation D, Rule 506.purchasers of
such stock, Concierge expectswould oppose such a demand for rescission, and its
directors would provide the expenses for the litigation. Concierge's liquidity
would not be immediately affected, due to improve its liquidity through salesdirectors' providing the expenses
for such litigation. However, such litigation would likely reduce the ability of
its PCATM and that it will not haveConcierge to raise additional fundscapital for its operations and thereby affect its
liquidity. And, a plaintiff's judgment in the next
twelve months. Should the need arise during the next twelve months for
additional capital,a class action lawsuit would likely
force Concierge believes that several of its existing shareholders
will provide equity capital to meet this need.into a voluntary chapter 11 reorganization or, possibly,
liquidation.
Product Research and Development. Concierge's initial PCA(TM) (audio
e-mail version) is designed to execute on a personal computer operating under
Windows 95/98 and using Microsoft Outlook or Outlook Express as an e-mail
client. Future versions are expected to operate in the same or successor
environments, although the server-based, multi-user, versions will most likely
function under Microsoft NT or its derivative, Windows 2000. The initial PCATM,
however, is available for purchase and became available on October 3, 2000.
A June 3, 2000 and other projected product release dates were predicated
upon the fulfillment of firm commitments made to Concierge will performby outside
contractors. Some of those contractors failed to meet their commitments, and
Concierge was forced to delay product research and development duringintroduction. Due to the next twelve months. A single user versioncomplexity of the
PCATM was introduced in April 2000. Concierge is developing and will soon
offer server versions for Windows NT and Windows 2000. Later in 2000 Concierge
expectsproduct line, numerous specialized technical skills are essential to
develop and offer server versionssuccessful implementation. However, very few of these niche skills warrant
full-time employment of qualified specialists. It has thus always been the
intention of Concierge's management to outsource narrowly-focused, technical
functions to the Unixgreatest extent possible.
Support for Eudora and other e-mail clients is expected to be available
in the Linux operating
systems. Concierge will also perform product development work on adding several
foreign languagesnext version, whose release date is yet to its present, English-language models.be determined. Since Eudora
comprises less than ten percent of the Windows-based e-mail users, it is not
considered to be a significant impediment to the market appeal of the product.
Other Expected Developments. Concierge does not expect to purchase any
plant or significant equipment. It outsources the developmentimplementation of product
designs for its products that it develops, through the collaboration of its
president, Allen Kahn, and outside providers.
Concierge does expect to increase the number of its employees during the
next twelve months by adding approximately three employees, which would include
administrative and executive personnel.
Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Market Information. There is no established public trading market for
Concierge's common stock. None of its authorized shares of common stock are
subject to outstanding options or warrants to purchase, or securities
convertible into, common stock.
47
Concierge's outstanding 1,376,3801,435,655 shares of common stock will be
converted to 96,957,713 shares of common stock of Starfest on the basis of
70.44467.5355 shares to Starfest common stock to be exchanged for each share of
Concierge common stock. All 96,957,713 shares will be eligible for sale, but the
64,437,24060,189,663 shares to be distributed to Concierge's officers and directors will
be subject to the resale provisions of paragraph (d) of Rule 145 discussed above
under "Information About Starfest - Rule 144 and Rule 145 Restrictions on
trading."
Holders. There are 97175 holders of record of Concierge's common stock.
19
Dividends. Concierge has declared no cash dividends on its common stock
since its inception. There are no restrictions that limit Concierge's ability
to pay dividends on its common stock or that are likely to do so in the future.
Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosures.
- -----------
On February 28, 2001, Concierge dismissed its principal independent
accountant, Brad B. Haynes.
The reports of Brad B. Haynes on the financial statements of the Company
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission contained no adverse opinions
or disclaimers of opinion, and were not modified as to uncertainty, audit scope,
or accounting principles during the past two years or the interim period to
February 28, 2001, the date of dismissal.
The decision to change accountants was recommended and approved by the
Board of Directors of Concierge.
During the lastpast two fiscal years or interim periods prior to February 28, 2001,
there were no disagreements between Concierge and Brad B. Haynes, whether or not
resolved, on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial
statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to
Brad B. Haynes' satisfaction, would have caused it to make reference to the
period since June 30, 1999,
there have been no changessubject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports.
On March 1, 2001, Concierge engaged the firm of Kabani & Company, of
Fountain Valley, California, as independent accountants for Concierge. Prior to
March 1, 2001, neither Concierge, nor anyone on its behalf, had consulted with
Kabani & Company concerning the application of accounting principles to any
specific completed or contemplated transaction, or the type of audit opinion
that might be rendered on Concierge's principal independent accountant.financial statements.
48
Financial Statements.
- -----------------------------------------
See "Financial Statements - Concierge, Inc." for the independent auditor's
report dated MarchOctober 17, 2000 with respect to Concierge's balance sheet as of
June 30, 19992000 and the related statements of operations and deficit accumulated,
changes in shareholders' deficit and cash flows for the fiscal years ended June
30, 19992000 and June 30, 1998,1999, and the notes to such financial statements.
See also Concierge's unauditedstatements, and the
interim balance sheet dated Decemberas of March 31, 1999, and2001, the related statements of
operation and deficit accumulatedoperations and cash flows for the six monthsquarters ended DecemberMarch 31, 19992001 and December 31, 19982000 and
the notesperiod from inception (September 20, 1996) to such
interim financial statements. InMarch 31, 2001, and the
opinionstatement of management,changes in stockholders' deficit for the interim
financial statements include all adjustments necessaryperiod from inception
(September 20, 1996) to make the financial
statements not misleading.
20March 31, 2001.
49
VOTING AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
Starfest's management and Concierge's management will each solicit the
proxy of their company's stockholders with respect to the proposed merger
described herein.
Date, Time and Place Information.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Starfest. Starfest's stockholders will vote on the proposed mergerthree proposals at a
special meeting of the stockholders of Starfest to be held at 11:00 A.M.,
________________, ________________, 2000,2001, at 94944602 East Redfield Road, No. 1136,
Scottsdale, Arizona 85260.Palo Brea Lane, Cave
Creek, AZ 85331:
o to approve the merger with Concierge,
o to increase the authorized capital of Starfest from 65 million
shares of common stock, no par value, to 190 million shares of
common stock, $0.001 par value, and 10 million shares of
preferred stock, $0.001 par value, and
o to change the name of Starfest to "Concierge Technologies, Inc."
The merger is conditioned upon approval of all three proposals.
Starfest's officers, directors and affiliates are entitled to vote 3.7
percent of the outstanding shares entitled to vote. They have indicated that
they will vote to approve the merger.
Concierge. Stockholders of Concierge will vote on the proposed mergertwo proposals at a
special meeting of the stockholders of Concierge to be held on 11:00 A.M.,
__________, ___________________, 2000,2001, at ____________
_________________________________________________________.____________:
o to approve the merger with Starfest, and
o to amend the bylaws to increase to eleven the number of directors
of Concierge.
Concierge's officers, directors and their affiliates are entitled to
vote 66.562.1 percent of the outstanding shares entitled to vote. They have indicated that they will vote
their shares to approve or disapprove the merger.merger in accordance with the majority
vote cast by the other Concierge stockholders.
Voting Procedure. Voting by Starfest's stockholders and by Concierge's
stockholders may be by written ballot at the meetings or by written proxy.
Starfest stockholders of record as of ______________, 2000________________, 2001 shall be entitled
to vote at their meeting. Concierge stockholders of record as of the day before
the date of this Prospectus-Proxy Statement shall be entitled to vote at their
meeting. Provided a quorum is present in person or by proxy (as determined by
the aggregate voting rights of the common stock, considered as a whole),
abstentions by stockholders present in person at the meeting shall be counted as
a vote for rejecting the merger. None of the shares of Concierge are held of
record by brokers. Some ____________19,013,657 of the 23 million shares of Starfest are held
by brokers. Broker non-votes shall be counted as votes disapproving the proposed
merger.
50
Revocability of Proxy.
- ---------------------------------------------
A person giving a proxy has the power to revoke it. A revocation of a
proxy earlier given can be accomplished either (1) by written notification by
the giver of the proxy of an intent to revoke it, or (2) by attendance at the
special stockholders' meeting called to vote on the proposed merger and either
oral or written instruction to the person counting ballots on the merger vote of
an intention to revoke the earlier given proxy.
Effect of the Merger.
- --------------------------------------------
Should the merger be approved and effected -
o the Concierge entity merges into the Starfest entity, and the
separate existence of the Concierge entity ceases;
21
o the title to any real estate and other property owned by
Concierge is vested in Starfest without reversion or impairment;
o Starfest has all the liabilities of Concierge;
o Any proceeding pending against Concierge may be continued as if
the merger had not occurred or Starfest may be substituted in the
proceeding for Concierge;
o the articles of incorporation of Starfest are amended to the
extent provided in the plan of merger, to-wit:
o Starfest's authorized capital is increased from 65 million
shares of common stock, no par value, to 190 million
shares of common stock, par value $0.001, and ten million
shares of preferred stock, par value, $0.001, and
o Starfest's name is changed to "Concierge Technologies,
Inc.";
o the Concierge shareholders' interest in the Concierge common
stock are converted to interests in Starfest common stock, as
described in the Agreement of Merger, appended hereto as
"Appendix A," and in the Prospectus-Proxy Statement, to-wit: each
share of Concierge common stock will be converted into 70.44467.5355
shares of common stock of Starfest; and
o the shareholders of Concierge and of Starfest do not become
personally liable for the debts, liabilities or obligations of
the surviving entity by reason of the merger.
51
Dissenters' Rights of Appraisal.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Stockholders of Starfest and of Concierge who do not vote for or consent
in writing to the proposed merger, and who continuously hold their shares
through the effective date of the merger (should it be effected), are entitled
to exercise dissenters' rights of appraisal. Generally, any stockholder of
either Starfest or Concierge is entitled to dissent from consummation of the
plan of merger and to obtain payment of the fair value of his shares should the
merger be consummated.
The notices of the special meetings of stockholders of Starfest and of
Concierge, at which the votes shall be taken whether to approve the proposed
merger, must state that all stockholders are entitled to assert dissenters'
rights. The notices must be accompanied by a copy of the relevant portions of
California corporation law for the stockholders of Starfest and of Nevada
corporation law for the stockholders of Concierge, describing dissenters'
rights, the procedure for exercise of dissenters' rights, and the procedure for
judicial appraisal of the value of the shares of common stock of Starfest or
Concierge, as the case may be, should a dissenter and his or her corporation not
agree on the value of such shares.
All stockholders of Starfest or Concierge who desire to consider whether
their dissenters' rights should be exercised should carefully 22
read the relevant
portions of the California corporation law or the Nevada corporation law that
will accompany the notice of the special meeting of stockholders. You should
especially be alert to the requirement thatfollowing requirements if you wish to assert your
dissenters' rights, yourights:
o You must deliver to the secretary of the corporation, by mail,
special courier or personal delivery at the corporation's address
before the vote is taken, written notice of your intent to demand
payment for your shares if the merger is approved. Delivery of
this notice can also be made to the corporate secretary at the
special stockholders' meeting before the vote is taken on the
merger. The notice may state simply, "I intend to demand payment
for my shares should the merger between Starfest and Concierge be
approved." It should be signed and dated. You will not be
furnished a separate form for this purpose with the delivery of
the proxy card or this Prospectus-Proxy Statement.
o You must not vote your shares in favor of, or consent in writing
to, the merger, although you will not lose your dissenter's
rights by failing to vote. Other procedures are required and will be described
in detail in the copy of state corporation law that describe dissenters' rights. A mere vote against the merger does
not satisfy the requirement of delivering written notice before
the meeting of your intent to demand payment for your shares if
the proposed merger is effectuated.
52
o If the merger is authorized, the corporation must send you a
written notice within ten days after the merger is effected. The
notice must tell you where and by when you must demand payment
for your shares and where and when your stock certificates must
be deposited. For Starfest shareholders, the notice must also
state the price Starfest has determined to be the fair market
price.
o You must then demand payment, certify whether you acquired
beneficial ownership of your shares before the date set forth in
the written notice to you, and deposit your certificates, if any,
in accordance with the notice. If you fail to do this, you will
lose your right to payment for your shares.
o Within 30 days after your demand for payment, the company must
pay you the amount it estimates to be the fair value of your
shares, plus interest.
o If you disagree with the corporation's estimate of the fair value
of your shares, you may notify the corporation in writing within
30 days of your estimate of the fair value of your shares, plus
interest, and demand payment of this amount.
o If a demand for payment remains unsettled for a Concierge
dissenting shareholder, Concierge must commence a proceeding in
court within 60 days after receiving your demand for payment. The
court will determine the fair value of your shares. If the
corporation fails to commence this proceeding within the 60-day
period, it must pay you the amount you demanded.
o If a demand for payment remains unsettled for a Starfest
dissenting shareholder, such shareholder must commence an action
in court within six months after the date on which notice of the
approval of the merger was mailed by Starfest or lose his or her
appraisal rights. If an action is timely filed, the court will
settle the valuation issue.
Persons Making the Solicitation.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Members of management of each of Starfest and of Concierge will solicit
proxies for that entity. MANAGEMENT OF EACH COMPANY RECOMMENDS THAT THE PROPOSED
MERGER BE APPROVED.
They will solicit proxies by the mails, by telephone, or by personal
solicitation. Starfest and Concierge will each bear its cost of its
solicitation.
Management of each of Starfest and of Concierge will vote signed but
otherwise unmarked proxies to approve the merger.
Interest of Certain Persons in the Proposed Merger.
- --------------------------------------------------
Other than having an interest in the proposed merger by reason of (1)
his or her ownership of common stock of Starfest or Concierge or (2) election to
office of the surviving company, there is no substantial interest in the merger,
direct or indirect, of any Starfest or Concierge director, executive officer
since the beginning of the last fiscal year, nominee for election as a director
or associate of any of the foregoing persons.
Voting Securities and Principal Holders Thereof.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The merger must be approved by an affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of common stock of each of Starfest and of
Concierge.
53
There are presently outstanding 23 million shares of common stock of
Starfest held of record by ______________96 stockholders. Each share is entitled to one vote
on the proposed merger.
There are presently outstanding 1,376,3801,435,655 shares of common stock of
Concierge held of record by 97175 stockholders. Each share is entitled to one vote
on the proposed merger.
The record date for determining the right to vote on the proposed merger
is _________________, 2000_______________, 2001 for Starfest shareholders and the day before the date
on the cover of this Prospectus-Proxy Statement for Concierge shareholders.
23
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial
ownership of the common stock of Starfest as of May 7, 2000January 15, 2001 by each
individual who is known to Starfest as of the date of this filing, to be the beneficial owner of more than five
percent of Starfest's common stock, its only voting security.
Name and Address Amount and
Of Beneficial Nature of Percent of
Owner Beneficial Ownership Class
---------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------------
Thomas J. Kenan 1,360,000 shares(1) 5.9%
212 N.W. 18th St.
Oklahoma City, OK 73103
Gary Bryant 1,310,000 shares(2) 5.7%
46471 Manitou
Indian Wells, CA 92210
- -------------------------
(1) 760,000 of these shares are held of record by the Marilyn C. Kenan
Trust, of which trust Marilyn C. Kenan, the spouse of Thomas J. Kenan,
is the trustee and beneficiary. Mr. Kenan disclaims any beneficial
ownership of any of the shares held in the trust.
(2) 570,000 of these shares are held of record by Suzanne Bryant, Mr.
Bryant's spouse, and 370,000 are held of record by Newport Capital
Corporation, a corporation under the control of Mr. Bryant. Mr. Bryant
disavowsdisclaims any beneficial ownership of any of the shares held by Mrs.
Bryant.
The table below sets forth the ownership, as of May 7, 2000,January 15, 2001, by all
directors and nominees, and each of the named executed officers of Starfest, and
directors and executive officers of Starfest as a group, of the common stock of
Starfest, its only voting security.
54
Name and Address Amount and Nature of Percent of
of Owner Beneficial Ownership Class
---------------- -------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------------- -----------
Michael Huemmer 760,000 shares 3.3%
#1136
94944602 East Redfield Road
Scottsdale,Palo Brea Lane
Cave Creek, AZ 8526085331
Janet Alexander 100,000 shares 0.4%
Suite C
120 East Andreas Road
Palm Springs, CA 92262
Officers and Directors
as a Group (2 persons) 860,000 shares 3.7%
There are no arrangements which may result in a change in control of
Starfest other than the proposed merger described herein. There are no known
voting trusts, pooling arrangements or similar agreements in place between or
among any of the shareholders.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial
ownership of the common stock of Concierge as of May 7, 2000
24
January 15, 2001 by each
individual who is known to Concierge as of the date of this filing, to be the beneficial owner of more than
five percent of Concierge's common stock, its only voting security.
Amount of Post-
Merger Company
Amount and Nature Shares To Be
Name and Address of of Beneficial Percent of Owned If Merger Percent
of
Beneficial Owner OwnershipOwnerwhip of Class Is Approved of Class
------------------- ----------------- ---------- --------------- ------------------ ---------------- ---------
Allen E. Kahn 370,000346,500 shares 26.9% 26,064,280 21.7%24.1% 23,401,050 19.5%
7547 W. Manchester Ave.,
No. 325
Los Angeles, CA 90045
Samuel C.H. Wu 403,500 shares(1) 29.3% 28,424,154 23.7%28.1% 27,250,574 22.7%
1202 Tower 1,
Admiralty Centre
18 Harcourt Road
Hong Kong, China
Polly Force Co., Ltd. 160,000 shares(1) 11.6% 11,271,040 9.4%11.1% 10,805,680 9.0%
1202 Tower 1,
Admiralty Centre
18 Harcourt Road
Hong Kong, China
East Asia Strategic
Holdings, Ltd. 109,500 shares(2) 8.0% 7,713,618 6.4%
1202 Tower 1, Admiralty Centre
18 Harcourt Road
Hong Kong, China
Gary E. Bryant 75,000 shares 5.1% 6,593,300(3) 5.3%
3 Gavina
Monarch Beach, CA 926297.6% 7,395,137 6.2%
1202 Tower 1,
Admiralty Centre
18 Harcourt Road
Hong, Kong, China
- -------------------------
(1) Mr. Wu is the record owner of 110,000 shares of common stock of Concierge
and is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the following number of shares
held of record by the following corporations of each of which Mr. Wu is a
director: Polly Force, Ltd.-160,000Ltd. - 160,000 shares, East Asia Strategic Holdings,
Ltd. - 109,500 shares, and Link Sense, Ltd. - 24,000 shares.
(2) The beneficial ownership of these shares is also attributed to Samuel C.H.
Wu. See footnote (2)(1) above.
(3) This number includes 1,310,000 shares of Starfest owned by Mr. Bryant
prior to the vote on the proposed merger.55
The table below sets forth the ownership, as of May 7, 2000,January 15, 2001, by all
directors and nominees and each of the named executive officers of Concierge,
and of directors, director nominees and executive officers of Concierge as a
group, of the common stock of Concierge, its only voting security.
25
Amount of Post-
Merger Company
Amount and Nature Shares To Be
Name and Address of of Beneficial Percent of Owned If Merger Percent
of
Name and Address of Owner OwnershipOwnerwhip of Class Is Approved of Class
-------------------------------------------- ----------------- -------- ---------------- ---------- --------------- -----------------
Allen E. Kahn 370,000346,500 shares 26.9% 26,064,280 21.7%24.1% 23,401,050 19.5%
7547 W. Manchester Ave.,
No.No 325
Los Angeles, CA 90045
F. Patrick Flaherty 70,000 shares(1) 5.1% 4,931,080 4.1%4.9% 4,727,485 3.9%
637 29th Street
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Donald V. Fluken 2,130 sharesshares(5) (2) 150,046143,851 (2)
313 Pagosa Way
Fremont, CA 94539
James E. Kirk 57,500 shares 4.2% 4,050,530 3.4%4.0% 3,883,291 3.2%
1401 Kirby, N.E.
Albuquerque, NM 87112
Herbert Marcus, III 500 shares (2) 35,22233,768 (2)
5505 Wenonan Drive
Dallas, TX 75209
Harry F. Camp 500 shares (2) 35,22233,768 (2)
1150 Bayhill Drive
San Bruno, CA 94066
David W. Neibert 10,600 shares(3) (2) 746,706715,876 (2)
24028 Clarington Drive
West Hills, CA 91304
John Conners 0 shares - 0 -
The Ayco Company L.P.
17877 Von Karman Avenue, Ste 500
Irvine, CA 92614
Samuel C.H. Wu 403,500 shares(4) 29.3% 28,424,154 23.7%28.1% 27,250,574 22.7%
1202 Tower 1,
Admiralty Centre
18 Harcourt Road
Hong Kong, China
Officers and Directors
as a Group (9(8 persons) 914,730891,230 shares 66.5% 64,437,240 53.7%62.1% 60,189,663 50.2%
- -------------------------
56
(1) The shares attributed to Mr. Flaherty include 10,000 shares held of
record by each of Mr. Flaherty's sons, Ryan Flaherty and Cole Flaherty.
(2) Less than one percent.
(3) The shares attributed to Mr. Neibert include 200 shares issued to his
son, Ryan Neibert, and 100 shares issued to his daughter, Megan Neibert.
26
(4) Mr. Wu is the record owner of 110,000 shares of common stock of
Concierge and is deemed to be the beneficial owner of the following
number of shares held of record by the following corporations of each of
which Mr. Wu is a director: Polly Force, Ltd.-160,000Ltd. - 160,000 shares, East
Asia Strategic Holdings, Ltd. - 109,500 shares, and Link Sense, Ltd. -
24,000 shares.
(5) The shares attributed to Mr. Fluken are held of record by Connection
L.L.C.
Directors, Executive Officers and Significant Employees.
- -------------------------------------------------------------
Set forth below are the names and terms of office of each of the persons who
will serve as a director or an executive officer of the company should the
merger be approved and a description of the business experience of each during
the past five years.
Office Held Term of
Person Office Since Office
------ ------ ----------- -------
Allen E. Kahn, 63 Chief Executive Officer, 1996 2000
President,2001
Director, and Chairman of
the Board of Directors
F. Patrick Flaherty, 62 Executive Vice President 20001999 2001
Donald V. Fluken, 58 Vice President of Finance, 2000 2001
Chief Financial Officer
James E. Kirk, 64 Secretary 1999 2001
and Director 1996 2001
Herbert Marcus, III, 61 Director 2000 2001
Harry F. Camp, 77 Director 2000 2001
David W. Neibert, 44 Director 2000 2001
John Conners, 4645 Director 2000 2001
Samuel C.H. Wu, 5252(1) Director Nominee 2000 2001
- --------------------------
(1) Mr. Wu has agreed to serve as a director should the merger occur.
57
Allen E. Kahn. Mr. Kahn invented the company's initial product, the
-------------
Personal Communications Attendant, and formed Concierge in 1996. Immediately
prior to that time, he had been employed as president of Advanced Imaging
Centers, an organization formed to establish Ultrafast CT medical imaging
centers in San Diego and Las Vegas.
F. Patrick Flaherty. Mr. Flaherty was the president of Manhattan
-------------------
Resources of Manhattan Beach, California, a distributor of computer hardware and
software products, from April 1994 to January 1998. He became employed in
January 1998, and was employed until recently, as the regional manager of W.
Quinn Associates, Inc. of Reston, Virginia.Virginia, a publisher of and vendor of
mainframe software. In December 1999 he became employed as the executive vice
president of Concierge.
Donald V. Fluken. Mr. Fluken was employed from May 1991 until January
----------------
1997 as the managing director of Results Management of Fremont, California.California, a
company engaged in financial consulting. From January 1997 until June 1999 he
was employed as the chief financial officer of Chemtrak, Inc. of Sunnyvale,
California.California, a company that manufactured and marketed medical testing devices.
After Mr. Fluken terminated his employment with Chemtrak, it filed a voluntary
chapter 11 petition under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. From June 27
1999 he became
employed and is still employed as the part-time chief financial officer of CFO
Connection, Inc.L.L.C. of San Jose, California.California, a company engaged in financial
consulting. He became employed in February 2000 as the part-time chief financial
officer of Concierge. He estimates he devotes approximately 95 percent of his
time on Connection, L.L.C.'s affairs and approximately five percent of his time
on Concierge's affairs.
James E. Kirk. Mr. Kirk has been a self-employed attorney in
-------------
Albuquerque, New Mexico for the last five years.
Herbert Marcus, III. Mr. Marcus has been employed since January 1991 as
-------------------
the senior vice president of Burgess Management Corp. of Dallas, Texas, a real
estate management company.
Harry F. Camp. Mr. Camp founded the Harry Camp Company in 1948, a
--------------
company that operated retail women's accessory departments inside department and
retail stores and operated boutique stores in major shopping centers. Prior to
its saleIt was
sold in 1975, the Harry Camp Company operated in 310 cities in 42 states.1975. In 1971 Mr. Camp co-founded the Identicator, Inc., which designs,
develops, manufactures and markets inkless identification systems. This isMr. Camp
serves today as chairman of the first
company to introduce PC-based fingerprint identification systems.board of directors of Identicator, Inc. A
division of the company merged with Identix, Inc. in April 1999, at which time the
division's clients included several Fortune 500 companies, the F.B.I., the
Social Security Administration, the U.S. Secret Service, the Defense Manpower
Data Center and several states.1999. In 1982 Mr.
Camp founded Camp Investors, Ltd. a limited partnership that provided venture
capital financing to start-up and emerging growth technology companies.
Mr. Camp serves today as chairman of the
board of directors of Identicator, Inc.58
David W. Neibert. Mr. Neibert was employed from June 1993 until October
----------------
1997 as the president and chief operating officer of Roamer One, ofa national
wireless service provider, based in Torrance, California. From February 1994
until March 1999 he served as a director of Roamer One's parent company, Intek
Global Corp., and several of its subsidiaries including Midland, USA of Kansas
City, Missouri and Roamer One. From October 1997 until March 1999 he was
employed as the executive vice president of business development of InterGlobalIntek Global
Corp. (now named "Securicor Wireless"), a multinational wireless technology
provider of Kansas City,
Missouri.New York, New York. From April 1999 until the present he has been
employed as the president and general partner of The Wallen Group of West Hills,
California.
John Conners. Mr. Conners is currently Vice President, Financial
-------------
Counseling for The Ayco Company, L.P., basedCalifornia, a consulting organization in the Irvine, California office.
Mr. Conners received his law degree from Albany Law School in 1978wireless and joined
the New York State Bar in the same year. He also received a Bachelor of Science
degree from the State University of New York. Mr. Conners' practice involves
counseling executive in major Fortune 500 companies, many of which are involved
in telecommunications and Internet technology.other high technology
industries.
Samuel C.H. Wu. Mr. Wu is a graduate of the University of California,
--------------
Berkley,Berkeley, where he received a BSEE degree in electronics and computer sciences
and an MBA degree. After being employed as afrom 1976 to December 1983 with the Bank
of America in several positions leading up to its senior marketing and credit
officer
with the Bank of America - World Banking Division in Tokyo, London and Hong Kong, he founded in
January 1984 and still directs Hong Kong-based Woodsford Shipping & Trading Co.,
Ltd., an import-export and financial services company.
28
Harry F. Camp, a director, is the uncle of Herbert Marcus, III, a
director.
Executive Compensation.
- ----------------------------------------------
The following information concerns the compensation of Concierge's chief
executive officer for the last three completed fiscal years. No other executive
officers or individuals received total annual salary and bonus that exceeded
$100,000 during the last three completed fiscal years.
Restricted
Name of Chief Executive Officer Year Cash Salary -Stock Awards
------------------------------- ---- ----------------------- -------------
Allen E. Kahn 2000 $108,000 $1,100
1999 None None
1998 None
1997 None
Other than as stated above, no cash or stock compensation, deferred
compensation or long-term incentive plan awards were issued or granted to
Concierge's management during or with respect to the last fiscal year.
Other Arrangements. There are no employment contracts, compensatory
plans or arrangements, including payments to be received from Starfest, with
respect to any director or executive officer of Starfest which would in any way
result in payments to any such person because of his or her resignation,
retirement or other termination of employment with Starfest or its subsidiaries,
any change in control of Starfest, or a change in the person's responsibilities
following a change in control of Starfest.
59
Stock Options.
---------------------------
Starfest has adopted a stock option plan which shall survive the merger,
the major provisions of which Plan are as follows:
Options granted under the plan may be "employee incentive stock options"
as defined under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code or non-qualified stock
options, as determined by the option committee of the board of directors at the
time of grant of an option. The plan enables the option committee of the board
of directors to grant up to 500,000 stock options to employees and consultants
from time to time. The option committee has granted no options.
Concierge has no stock option plan butand no outstanding options. On June
21, 1997, the directors of Concierge granted Allen Kahn, president and a
director of Concierge, an option to buy 70,000 shares of common stock of
Concierge at $10 a share, an exercise price far greater than the fair value of
the shares at the time. The option was to expire on June 21, 2000. Had Mr. Kahn
exercised the option, the 70,000 shares of Concierge common stock would convert
in June 1997 issued still-
outstanding optionsthe merger with Starfest to 4,727,485 shares of Starfest common stock, which
would have been purchased by Mr. Kahn at an effective price of $0.15 a share. On
May 3, 2000 the following persons as set forth below:
Relationship Shares Per Share Expiration
Person to Concierge Under Option Exercise Price Date
- ------------ ------------ ------------ -------------- ----------
Harold Adams None 30,000 $10 06-21-00
Ron Layton None 40,000 $10 06-21-00
-------directors of Concierge voted to issue such 70,000
29
shares of
Concierge common stock directly to Mr. Kahn in exchange for (1) his surrendering
his stock option and (2) services he had performed for Concierge valued by the
directors at $22,400, which was the book value - $0.32 a share - of the 70,000
shares at the time of their issuance. Should the merger betweenwith Starfest and Concierge be
approved, these 70,000 shares of Concierge stock will convert to 4,727,485
shares of Starfest common stock at an effective price to Mr. Kahn of $22,400 in
services rendered, or $0.005 a share of Starfest stock. The market value of
these 4,727,485 shares will be determined by the anti-dilution provisionstrading price of Starfest's
common stock at the time of the above options would result inmerger. On January 22, 2001 the options being
exercisable as follows:
Post-Merger Shares Post-Merger Per-Share Post-Merger
Person Under Option Exercise Price Expiration Date
- ------------ ------------------ --------------------- ---------------
Harold Adams 2,113,320 $0.142 06-21-00
Ron Layton 2,817,760 $0.142 06-21-00
---------
4,931,080
closing price of
Starfest's common stock was $0.115 bid and $0.125 asked.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to Starfest, Concierge and each person who will serve as a
director or executive officer of the company should the proposed merger be
approved, there have been no transactions during the last two years, or proposed
transactions, in which any of them had or is to have a direct or indirect
material interest.
Transactions with Promoters. The persons, whose names are set forth
below, may be deemed to be "promoters" of the company. Set forth opposite the
name of each is (1) a description of the nature and amount of anything of value
(including money, stock, property, contracts, options, or rights of any kind)
that was, or is to be received by each promoter, directly or indirectly, either
from Starfest or Concierge and (2) the nature and amount of any assets,
services or other consideration (therefore received) or to be received by
Starfest or Concierge:
60
Shares of Common Stock of
ConciergeConciege Received or To Be Received or To Be
Received by the Person Received by Concierge
----------------------------------- ---------------------
Person No. of Shares of
Starfest Into
Which These
No. of Pre- Price Per Total Shares Will
Person Merger Shares Share Value Convert Nature Value
- ------------------- ------------- ------------- --------- -------- -------- --------------------------- ---------------- ----------
Allen E. Kahn 260,000 $148,000$0.01 $ 2,600 17,559,230 Services $ 260
110,0002,600(1)
40,000 $0.32 $ 12,800 2,701,420 Services $ 35,200(1)12,800(2)
70,000 $0.32 $ 22,400 4,727,485 Surrender of $ 22,400(3)
Stock Options and
Services
James E. Kirk 25,000 $0.40 $ 10,000 1,688,388 Services $ 10,000(2)10,000(4)
20,000 $1.00 $ 20,000 1,350,710 Services $ 20,000(3)20,000(5)
12,500 $0.40 $ 5,0005,00 844,194 Cash $ 5,000
F. Patrick Flaherty 10,000 $2.00 $ 20,000 675,355 Cash $ 20,000
10,000 $1.00 $ 10,000 675,355 Cash $ 10,000
70,00050,000 $0.32 $ 22,40016,000 3,376,775 Services $ 22,400(4)16,000(6)
Donald V. Fluken 2,130 $0.32 $ 682 143,851 Services $ 682(4)682(6)
Herbert Marcus, III 500 $0.32 $ 160 33,768 Services $ 160(4)160(6)
Harry F. Camp 500 $0.32 $ 160 33,768 Services $ 160(4)160(6)
David W. Neibert 10,600 $0.32 $ 3,392 715,876 Services $ 3,392(4)3,392(6)
Samuel C.H. Wu 378,500 $0.368 $139,200 25,562,186 Cash $139,200
25,000 $0.40 $ 10,000 1,688,388 Services $ 10,000(5)
Newport Capital 75,00010,000(7)
Gary Bryant 2,129 $0.32 $ 24,00019,456 143,783 Services $ 24,000(6)19,456(8)
John Everding 37,500 $0.32 $ 12,000 2,532,581 Services $ 12,000(8)
30
John Everding 37,500 $ 12,000 Services $ 12,000(6)
- -------------------------
61
(1) These shares were issued on January 17, 1997 as part of the initial
organization of the company and were valued by the board of directors at
the shares' par value, $0.01 a share.
(2) Mr. Kahn's services consisted of hispreviously uncompensated services as
chief executive officer of Concierge from September 26, 1996 until
February 21, 2000, the date of the proposed
merger with Starfest.award of the stock. His services were
valued on February 21, 2000 at $0.32 a share of Concierge's Common Stockcommon
stock, its book value at that time, and were valued by Mr. Kahn and by
James E. Kirk, officers and directors of Concierge from 1996 until 2000.
(2)(3) Mr. Kahn was issued 70,000 shares on May 2, 2000 as compensation for his
surrendering an option to purchase 70,000 shares of Concierge common
stock at $10 a share. The shares were valued at $0.32 a share, their
book value. In taking this action, the board also considered Mr. Kahn's
services as president and chief executive officer since September 1996.
(4) Mr. Kirk's services consisted of legal services from September 26, 1996
until the date of the proposed merger with Starfest. His services were
valued at $0.40 a share of Concierge's common stock and were valued by
himself and Allen Kahn, officers and directors of Concierge from 1996
until 2000, and Garth W. Reynolds, a former officer and director of
Concierge from 1996 to 1999.
(3)(5) These legal services were performed in between September 1996 and May 2000,
at a time when shares of stock of Concierge were being sold at prices
varying from $0.40 to $3.00 a share.
(4)(6) This person's services consisted of his services as an officer and a
director of
Concierge rendered during 2000 prior to May 5, 2000. The shares were
valued at Concierge's $0.32 book value at the time the services were
rendered, and the services were valued by the board of directors of
Concierge.
(5)(7) Mr. Wu's services consisted of his raising money for Concierge in Hong
Kong, where Mr. Wu lives. The services were valued at $0.40 a share by
the board of directors of Concierge.
(6)(8) This person's services consisted of his services as a consultant to the
company rendered during 1999 and 2000 prior to May 5, 2000 and in
connection with the proposed merger with Starfest. The shares were
valued at Concierge's $0.32 book value at the time the servicesshares were
rendered,issued, and the services were valued by the Concierge board of
directors.
3162
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INDEX
The financial statements of Starfest and of Concierge appear as follows:
Starfest, Inc.
Independent Auditors' Report.......................................Report F-1
Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, 2000 F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
2000 and 1999 F-3
Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
for the period from
December 31, 1997 to December 31, 2000 F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
2000 and 1999 F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-6
Independent Auditors' Report F-11
Balance Sheet as of December 31, 1999.............................. F-21999 F-12
Statement of Operations for the years
ended December 31, 1999 and
December 31, 1998 .......................................... F-3F-13
Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
(Deficit) for the period from
December 31, 1997 to December 31, 1999 ..................... F-4F-14
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998 .................... F-5F-15
Notes to Financial Statements ..................................... F-6F-16
Balance SheetSheets as of March 31, 1999 and
March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) ..................................F-9
StatementJune 30, 2001 (unaudited) F-20
Statements of Operations for the three-month
periodssix months
ended March 31, 1999June 30, 2001 and March 31,June 30, 2000 (Unaudited) .................................F-10
Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
(Deficit) for the period December 31,
1998 to March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) .........................F-11(unaudited) F-21
Statements of Cash Flows for the threesix months
ended March 31, 1999June 30, 2001 and March 31,June 30, 2000 (Unaudited) ...........................................F-13(unaudited) F-22
Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements (Unaudited) .........................F-14F-23
Concierge, Inc.
Report of Independent Auditors.....................................F-17Auditors F-25
Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1999 .................................F-182000 F-26
Statement of Operations and Deficit Accumulated
for the Years Ended June 30, 19992000 and
June 30, 19981999 and the Period from
September 20, 1996 (Inception Date)
to June 30, 1999 ...........................................F-192000 F-27
Statement of Changes in Shareholders' DeficitEquity
for the Period from
September 20, 1996 (Inception Date)
to June 30, 2000 F-28
Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
June 30, 19992000 and June 30, 19981999 and
the Period from September 20, 1996
(Inception Date) to June 30, 1999 ...........................................F-202000 F-29
Notes to Financial Statements F-30
Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2001 (Unaudited) F-39
Statement of Operations for the nine-month
periods ended March 31, 2001 and
March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) F-40
63
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
June 30, 1999nine-month
periods ended March 31, 2001 and
June 30, 1998 and
the Period from September 20, 1996
(Inception Date) to June 30, 1999 ..........................F-21March 31, 2000 (Unaudited) F-41
Notes to Financial Statements......................................F-22
Balance SheetStatements (Unaudited) F-42
64
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Starfest, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Starfest, Inc. (a
California Corporation) (the "Company") as of December 31, 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Starfest, Inc. as of
December 31, 2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
years ended December 31, 2000 in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the consolidated
financial statements, the Company's did not earn any revenue during the year
ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 (unaudited)..................F-24
Statementand the Company has incurred net losses from
inception to December 31, 2000 of $3,055,206 including a net loss of $398,349
during the year ended December 31, 2000. These factors, among others, as
discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's
plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 4. The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ Kabani & Company, Inc.
KABANI & COMPANY, INC.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Fountain Valley, California
March 21, 2001
F-1
Starfest, Inc. & Subsidiary
Consolidated Balance Sheet
December 31, 2000
Asset
-----
Current Asset:
Cash $ 40
-----------
Total Current Asset 40
-----------
$ 40
===========
Liabilities And Shareholders' Deficit
-------------------------------------
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 37,960
Note payable to Concierge, Inc. 100,000
Payable to shareholders 269,933
-----------
Total current liabilities 407,893
Shareholders' Deficit:
Common stock, no par value,
65,000,000 shares authorized;
23,100,000 issued and outstanding 2,711,751
Accumulated Deficit (3,119,604)
-----------
Total shareholders' deficit ( 407,853)
-----------
$ 40
===========
See notes to financial statements.
F-2
Starfest, Inc. & subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Operations
and Deficit Accumulated
(Unaudited) for the Interim Six MonthsTwelve months Ended December 31,
1999 and December 31,
1998 and the Period From September 20, 1996
(Inception Date)
2000 1999
------------- -----------
Revenues $ - $ -
General and Administrative
Expenses 461,947 518,606
-------------- ----------
Operating Loss (461,947) (518,606)
Provision for income
taxes 800 -
-------------- ----------
Net Loss $ (462,747) $ (518,606)
============== ===========
Net Loss Per Common
Share $ .02 $ .03
Weighted Average Common
Shares Outstanding 23,011,688 15,893,441
See notes to December 31, 1999 ......................F-25
Statementfinancial statements.
F-3
Starfest, Inc. & subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of changes in stockholders' equity (deficit)
Common stock Retained
Number of Amount Earnings
Shares Total (Deficit) Total
Balance December 31, 1997 6,236,323 $1,598,072 $(2,135,885) $(537,813)
Net loss for 1998 - - (2,366) (2,366)
---------- --------- ----------- ---------
Balance December 31, 1998 6,236,323 $1,598,072 $(2,138,251) $(540,179)
Shares issued for services 2,313,338 87,200 - 87,200
Shares issued for assets 2,950,000 118,000 - 118,000
Shares issued for debt
extinguishments 6,165,005 646,379 - 646,379
Shares issued for cash 4,033,333 190,000 - 190,000
Net loss for 1999 - - (518,606) (518,606)
---------- --------- ----------- ----------
Balance December 31, 1999 21,697,999 $2,639,651 $(2,656,857) $ (17,206)
Shares issued for services 1,302,001 65,100 - 65,100
Shares issued for cash 100,000 7,000 - 7,000
Net loss for 2000 - - (462,747) (462,747)
---------- --------- ----------- ----------
Balance December 31, 2000 23,100,000 $2,711,751 $(3,119,604) $(407,853)
=========== ========== ============ ==========
See notes to financial statements.
F-4
Starfest, Inc. & subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited) for the Six MonthsTwelve months Ended December 31,
1999 and December 31, 1998
and the Period From September 20, 1996
(Inception Date)
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Net Cash From
operating Activities:
Net loss $( 462,747) $( 518,606)
Adjustments to reconcile
net loss to net cash
used by operating activities:
Shares issued for services 65,100 87,200
Shares issued for debt
extinguishment - 646,379
Shares issued for assets - 118,000
Changes in assets and
liabilities:
Accounts payable 20,273 ( 413,692)
Other liabilities - ( 108,800)
----------- -----------
Net cash used by
operating activities ( 377,374) ( 189,519)
Cash flows from Financing
Activities:
Loans from Concierge, Inc. 100,000 -
Advances from shareholders 269,933 -
Common stock issued for cash 7,000 190,000
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by
Financing Activities 376,933 190,000
Increase in Cash 441 481
Cash at beginning of period 481 -
----------- -----------
Cash at end of period $ 40 $ 481
=========== ===========
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest $ - $ -
Income taxes $ - $ -
Non cash financing transactions:
Shares for services $ 65,100 $ 87,200
Shares for debt extinguishment $ - $ 646,379
Shares for purchase of assets $ - $ 118,000
See notes to December 31, 1999 ......................F-26financial statements.
F-5
Starfest, Inc. & subsidiary
Notes toTo Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2000 and 1999
(Unaudited) ................................................F-27
32Note 1 - Nature of Operations and principles of consolidation
Nature of operations
Starfest, Inc. (the Company), a California corporation, was incorporated on
August 18, 1993 as Fanfest, Inc. In August, 1995 the Company changed its name
to Starfest, Inc. During 1998, the Company was inactive, just having minimal
administrative expenses. During 1999 the Company attempted to pursue
operations in the online adult entertainment field. There were no revenues
from this endeavor. The Company is negotiating an agreement with a company
(see Note 3). The purpose of the merger is to effect an online communication
retrieval system such as e-mail via the telephone.
In March 2000, the Company acquired approximately 96.83 percent (8,250,000
shares) of the common stock of MAS Acquisition XX Corp.(MAS XX) for $
314,688. This amount was expensed in March 2000 as at the time of the
acquisition, MAS XX had no assets or liabilities and was inactive. Starfest
is now the parent corporation of MAS XX.
Principles of consolidation:
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company and its
wholly owned subsidiary MAS XX have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. All significant inter-company
balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Note 2 - Summary of significant accounting policies
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all liquid investments with a maturity of three months
or less from the date of purchase that are readily convertible into cash to
be cash equivalents.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Income taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for
differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and
liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future
based on enacted laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the
differences are expected to affect taxable income (loss). Valuation allowance
is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount
expected to be realized.
F-6
Starfest, Inc. & subsidiary
Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2000 and 1999
Basic and diluted net loss per share
Net loss per share is calculated in accordance with the Statement of
financial accounting standards No. 128 (SFAS No. 128), "Earnings per share".
SFAS No. 128 superseded Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.15 (APB 15).
Net loss per share for all periods presented has been restated to reflect the
adoption of SFAS No. 128. Basic net loss per share is based upon the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per share is
based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock
options were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the
treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to
be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if
later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock
at the average market price during the period. The net loss per common share
has been restated to retroactively effect a reverse stock split in the ratio
of one share for ten shares.
Stock-based compensation
In October 1995, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation". SFAS No. 123 prescribes accounting and reporting standards for
all stock-based compensation plans, including employee stock options,
restricted stock, employee stock purchase plans and stock appreciation
rights. SFAS No. 123 requires compensation expense to be recorded (i) using
the new fair value method or (ii) using the existing accounting rules
prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for
stock issued to employees" (APB 25) and related interpretations with pro
forma disclosure of what net income and earnings per share would have been
had the Company adopted the new fair value method. The Company uses the
intrinsic value method prescribed by APB25 and has opted for the disclosure
provisions of SFAS No. 123. The implementation of this standard did not
have any impact on the Company's financial statements.
Issurance of shares for service
Valuation of shares for services is based on the estimated fair market value
of the services performed.
Fair value of financial instruments
Statement of financial accounting standard No. 107, Disclosures about fair
value of financial instruments, requires that the Company disclose estimated
fair values of financial instruments. The carrying amounts reported in the
statements of financial position for current assets and current liabilities
qualifying as financial instruments are a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Costs of start-up activities
In April 1998, the ASEC of AICPA issued SOP No. 98-5, "Reporting on the costs
of start-up activities", effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 1998. SOP 98-5 requires the costs of start-up activities and organization
costs to be expensed as incurred. The Company adopted this standard in fiscal
1999 and the implementation of this standard did not have a material impact
on its financial statements.
Advertising
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred.
F-7
Starfest, Inc. & subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2000 and 1999
Risks and Uncertainties
The Company is subject to certain risks and uncertainties in the normal
course of business.
Recent Pronouncements
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and
reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument (including
certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded on
the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value.
SFAS No. 133 requires that changes in the derivative's fair value be
recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria
are met. SFAS No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS No. 138, is
effective for fiscal quarters of fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000.
The impact of adopting this statement is not expected to be material to the
Financial statements of the Company.
In June 1999, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 136, "Transfer of
Assets to a Not-for-Profit Organization or Charitable Trust that Raises or
Holds Contributions for Others." The impact of adopting this statement is
not expected to be material to the financial statements of the Company.
In June 1999, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 137, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities." The Company does not expect adoption of SFAS No. 137 to have a
material impact, if any, on its financial position or results of operations.
In June 2000, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 138, "Accounting for Certain instruments and Certain Hedging
Activities." The impact of adopting this statement is not expected to be
material to the financial statements of the Company.
In June 2000, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 139, "Rescission of FASB Statement No. 53 and Amendments to
Statements No. 63, 89, and 121." The impact of adopting this statement is not
expected to be material to the financial statements of the Company.
In September 2000, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, a replacement of FASB
Statement No. 125." The impact of adopting this statement is not expected to
be material to the financial statements of the Company.
In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements." SAB No. 101 summarizes the SEC's views on the application of
F-8
Starfest, Inc. & subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2000 and 1999
Recent Pronoucements (continued)
GAAP to revenue recognition. In June 2000, the SEC released SAB No. 101B that
delays the implementation date of SAB 101 until no later than the fourth
fiscal quarter of fiscal years b beginning after December 15, 1999. The
Company has reviewed SAB No. 101 and believes that it is in compliance with
the SEC's interpretation of revenue recognition.
In March 2000, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 44, "Accounting for Certain
Transactions involving Stock Compensation." This Interpretation clarifies (a)
the definition of employee for purposes of applying APB Opinion No. 25, (b)
the criteria for determining whether a plan qualifies as a noncompensatory
plan, (c) the accounting consequence of various modifications to the terms of
a previously fixed stock option or award, and (d) the accounting for an
exchange of stock compensation awards in a business combination. The
adoption of this Interpretation has not had a material impact on the
Company's financial position or operating results.
Note 3 - Merger Negotiations
On January 26, 2000 the Company entered into an agreement of merger with
Concierge, Inc., a Nevada corporation, pursuant to which, should the merger
be approved by the shareholders of both companies, 1,490,744 outstanding
shares of common stock of Concierge, Inc., (which includes 1,376,380 shares
outstanding at December 31, 2000 and 114,364 shares issued in January, 2001)
shall be converted into 96,957,713 common stock of the Company on the basis
of 65.0398 shares of the Company for each share outstanding of Concierge,
Inc. The 96,957,713 post merger shares shall be distributed to the
shareholders of Concierge, Inc. on a pro-rata basis. The transaction will be
accounted for as reverse merger and is subject to approval by shareholders of
both companies and Securities and Exchange Commission.
Note 4 - Going concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles which contemplate continuation of
the Company as a going concern. However, the Company incurred a net loss of
$462,747 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2000. Accumulated deficit
amounted to $3,119,604 at December 31, 2000. At December 31, 2000, the
Company had shareholders' deficit of $407,853. The continuing losses have
adversely affected the liquidity of the Company. These factors, among others,
raise substantial doubt as to the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to
the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or
classification and amounts of liabilities that might be necessary should the
Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
The Company's management intends to raise additional operating funds through
equity and/or debt offerings. However, there can be no assurance management
will be successful in this endeavor.
F-9
Starfest, Inc. & subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2000 and 1999
Note 5 - Income Taxes
No provision was made for Federal income tax since the Company has
significant net operating loss carryforwards. Through December 31, 2000, the
Company incurred net operating losses for tax purposes of approximately
$1,987,000. There is no significant differences between financial statement
and tax losses. The net operating loss carryforwards may be used to reduce
taxable income through the year 2015. Net operating loss for carryforwards
for the State of California are approximately $817,000 and are generally
available to reduce taxable income through the year 2006. The availability of
the Company's net operating loss carryforwards are subject to limitation if
there is a 50% or more positive change in the ownership of the Company's
stock. The provision for income taxes consists of the state minimum tax
imposed on corporations.
The gross deferred tax asset balance as of December 31, 2000 was
approximately $833,000. A 100% valuation allowance has been established
against the deferred tax assets, as the utilization of the loss carryforwards
can not reasonably be assured.
Note 6 - Notes Payable-Related parties
Notes payable to shareholders are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on
demand. Note payable to Concierge, Inc. is non-interest bearing, unsecured
and due on demand.
Note 7 - Shares issued for services
The Company issued 1,301,001 shares of common stock for consulting services
amounting $65,100. The Company has recorded the valuation of shares per
guidance under APB 25. According to APB 25, "when an entity issues equity
instruments to non-employees in exchange for goods or services, the
transactions should be accounted for based on the fair value of the goods
or services received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued,
whichever can be more reliably measured. Frequently, the fair value of
goods or services received from suppliers can be reliably measured and
therefore indicates the fair value of the equity instruments issued." The
valuation of these shares is based upon value of services received since the
Company did not have an established market value of its shares.
F-10
Jaak (Jack) Olesk
Certified Public Accountant
270 North Canon Drive, Suite 203
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
TelephoneTelephone: 310-288-0693
FaxFax: 310-288-0863
e-mail: jaakolesk@aol.com
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Starfest, Inc.
I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Starfest, Inc. as of December
31, 1999, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity
(deficit) and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1999 and the year ended
December 31, 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on my audits.
I conducted my audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
I believe that my audits provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.
In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Starfest, Inc. as of December 31,
1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 1999 and the year ended December 31, 1998, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the
financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring significant losses from
operations that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a
going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described
in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ Jaak Olesk
- ----------------------------------
Beverly Hills, California
February 9, 2000 F-1(except with respect to Note 4, as to which the date is March
7, 2000)
F-11
STARFEST, INC.
BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 1999
ASSETS
Cash $ 481
-----------
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)EQUITY(DEFICIT)
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable $ 17,687
-----------
Total current liabilities $ 17,687
-----------
Stockholders' equity (deficit)
Common stock: no par value,
65,000,000 shares authorized;
21,697,999 shares issued and
outstanding 2,639,651
Retained earnings (deficit) (2,656,857)
----------------------
Total stockholders' equity (deficit) (17,206)
----------------------
$ 481
======================
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-2F-12
STARFEST, INC.
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended
December 31, December 31,
1999 1998
------------ ------------
Revenues $ - $ -
----------- -----------------------
General and Administrative
Expenses 518,606 2,366
----------- ----------------------- ------------
Operating (Loss) (518,606) (2,366)
Provision for income taxes - -
----------- ----------------------- ------------
NET (LOSS) $ (518,606) $ (2,366)
Net (Loss)
per common share $ (.04) $ (01)(.01)
Weighted Average Shares
Outstanding 15,893,441 8,301,323
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-3
F-13
STARFEST, INC.
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY/(DEFICIT)
Common Stock Retained
Number of Amount Earnings
Shares Total (Deficit) Total
--------- ------ --------- -----
Balance,---------- ----------- ------------- -----------
Balance,
December 31, 1997 6,236,323 $1,598,072 $(2,135,885) $ (537,813)
Net (loss) for
year ended
December 31, 1998 - - (2,366) (2,366)
--------- --------- --------- ------------------- ----------- ------------- -----------
Balance,
December 31, 1998 6,236,323 1,598,072 (2,138,251) (540,179)
Shares issued
for services 2,313,338 87,200 - 87,200
Shares issued
for assets 2,950,000 118,000 - 118,000
Shares issued
for debt
extinguishment 6,165,005 646,379 - 646,379
Shares issued
for cash 4,033,333 190,000 - 190,000
Net (loss) for
year ended
December 31, 1999 - - (518,606) (518,606)
---------- ---------------------- -------------- ----------- ---------
Balance,
December 31, 1999 21,697,999 $2,639,651 $(2,656,857) $ (17,206)
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-4F-14
STARFEST, INC.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31,
1999 1998
---------- ----------
Net Cash From
Operating Activities:
Net (loss) $(518,606) $ (2,366)
Adjustments to reconcile
net loss to net cash
used by operating activities:
Shares issued for services 87,200 -
Shares issued for assets 118,000 -
Shares issued for
debt extinguishment 646,379 -
Changes in assets
and liabilities:
Accounts payable (413,692) 2,366
Other liabilities (108,800) -
--------- ---------
Net cash used)(used)
by operating activities (189,519) -
Investing Activities:
Net cash provided (used) by
Investing Activities - -
--------- ---------
Cash flows from Financing
Activities
Common stock issued for cash 190,000 -
--------- ---------
Net cash provided by
Financing Activities: 190,000
Increase in Cash 481 -
Cash at beginning of period - -
--------- ---------
Cash at end of period $ 481 $ -
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest $ - $ -
Income taxes $ - $ -
Non cash financing transactions:
Shares for services $ 87,200 $ -
Shares for debt extinguishment $ 646,379 $ -
Shares for assets $ 118,000 $ -
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-5F-15
STARFEST, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 1999
NOTE 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations
Starfest, Inc. (the "Company"), a California corporation, was incorporated on
August 18, 1993 as Fanfest, Inc.. In August, 1995 the Company changed its name
to Starfest, Inc.. During the year ended December 31, 1998, the Company was
inactive, just having minimal administrative expenses. During the year ended
December 31, 1999 the Company attempted to pursue operations in the online adult
entertainment field. However, the Company was not successful in this pursuit.
Cash equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market accounts and
in investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. There
were no cash equivalents at December 31, 1999.
Loss per share
The computation of loss per share of common stock is based on the
weighted average number of shares outstanding during the periods presented.
Fully diluted calculations are not presented since the Company only had losses
for all periods presented (thus antidilutive).
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Issuance of Shares for Services
Valuation of shares for services is based on the estimated fair market
value of the services performed.
Income taxes
The Company records its income tax provision in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income
Taxes". (See Note 3).
F-6F-16
STARFEST, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 1999
NOTE 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies(continued)
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Pursuant to SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments, the Company is required to estimate the fair value of all financial
instruments included on its balance sheet at December 31, 1999. The Company
considers the carrying value of such amounts in the consolidated financial
statements to approximate their expected realization and interest rates, which
approximate current market rates. During the periods presented and at December
31, 1999 the Company had no financial instruments.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
In fiscal 1999, the Company adopted SFAS No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income. This statement establishes standards for the reporting of
comprehensive income and its components in a financial statement that is
displayed with the same prominence as other financial statements. The adoption
of SFAS No. 130 required no additional disclosure for the Company and did not
have any effect on the Company's financial position, as there was no difference
between comprehensive loss and the net loss as reported.
Segment Disclosures
In Fiscal 1999, the Company adopted SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. This Statement establishes
standards for the way companies report information regarding operating segments
in annual financial statements. The adoption of SFAS No. 131 required no
additional disclosure for the Company as the Company operated in one principal
business segment.
Reclassifications
Certain items in prior period financial statements have been
reclassified to conform with 1999 classifications.
NOTE 2 - Basis of presentation and considerations related to continued existence
(going concern)
The Company's financial statements have been presented on the basis that
it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the
satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company
incurred a net loss of $518,606 for the year ended December 31, 1999. The
Company incurred a net loss of $2,366 for the year ended December 31, 1998.
F-7F-17
STARFEST, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 1999
NOTE 2 - Basis of presentation and considerations related to continued existence
(going concern) (continued)
These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt as to the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.
The Company's management intends to raise additional operating funds
through equity and/or debt offerings. However, there can be no assurance
management will be successful in this endeavor.
NOTE 3 - Income Taxes
The Company records its income tax provision in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income
Taxes" which requires the use of the liability method of accounting for deferred
income taxes.
Since the Company did not have taxable income during the periods
presented, no provision for income taxes has been provided. At December 31,
1999, the Company did not have any significant tax net operating loss
carryforwards (tax benefits resulting from losses for tax purposes have been
fully reserved due to the uncertainty of a going concern). At December 31, 1999,
the Company did not have any significant deferred tax liabilities or deferred
tax assets.
NOTE 4 - Subsequent Events
On January 18, 2000 the Company issued 1,302,001 of its common shares
for January, 2000 services, to three shareholders.
In January and February, 2000 the Company was in negotiations
regarding possibly entering into a business combination with Concierge,
Inc., a development stage software developer. Concierge, Inc. does not have
significant assets or revenues.
F-8
Starfest, Inc.
Balance Sheets
March 31, 2000
Assets
------
2000
-----------
Current Assets:
Cash $ 833
----------
Total Current Assets $ 833
==========
Liabilities And Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
----------------------------------------------
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 5,461
Payable to shareholders 24,814
-----------
Total current liabilities $ 30,275
-----------
Stockholders, Equity (Deficit):
Common stock, no par value,
65,000,000 shares authorized;
19,499,999 and 23,000,000 shares
issued and outstanding 2,647,253
Retained earnings (deficit) (2,676,695)
-----------
Total stockholders, equity
(deficit) (29,442)
-----------
$ 833
===========
See notes to financial statements.
F-9
Starfest, Inc.
Statements Of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31,
2000 1999
------------ ------------
Revenues $ - $ -
----------- -----------
General and Administrative
Expenses 19,038 2,424
----------- -----------
Operating Loss (19,038) (2,424)
Provision for income taxes 800 800
----------- -----------
Net Loss $ (19,838) (3,224)
=========== ===========
Accumulated Deficit - beginning of year (2,656,857) (2,138,251)
----------- -----------
Accumulated Deficit - end of year (2,676,695) (2,141,475)
Basic and Diluted Weighted Average
Number of Common Shares Outstanding 23,038,298 6,478,397
=========== ===========
Basic Loss Per Common Share $ (.00) $ (.00)
=========== ===========
Diluted Loss Per Common Share $ (.00) $ (.00)
=========== ===========
See notes to financial statements.
F-10
Starfest, Inc.
Statement Of Changes In Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
For the Three Months ended March 31, 2000 and March 31, 1999
Common Stock Retained
------------------------
Number of Earnings
Shares Amount (Deficit) Total
--------- ---------- ------------ ----------
Balance,
December 31, 1998 6,236,323 $1,598,072 $(2,138,251) $(540,179)
Shares issued
for services 208,339 208 - 208
Shares issued for
debt extinguished 298,338 127,400 - 127,400
Net loss for
three months
ended
March 31, 1999 - - (3,224) (3,224)
---------- --------- ---------- ---------
Balance,
March 31, 1999 6,7843,000 $1,725,680 $(2,141,475) $(415,795)
========== ========= ========== =========
Balance, December
31, 1999 21,697,999 $2,639,651 $(2,656,857) $ (17,206)
Shares issued
for services 602,001 602 602
Shares issued
for cash 700,000 7,000 7,000
Net loss for
three months
ended
March 31, 2000 (19,838) (19,838)
---------- --------- ---------- --------
Balance March
31, 2000 23,000,000 $2,647,253 $(2,676,695) $ (29,442)
========== ========= ========== ========
See notes to financial statements.
F-11
Starfest, Inc.
Statements Of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31,
2000 1999
----------- -----------
Net Cash From
operating Activities:
Net loss $ (19,838) $ (3,224)
Adjustments to reconcile
net loss to net cash
used by operating activities:
Shares issued for services 602 208
Loss on disposal of equipment - 2,216
Shares issued for debt
extinguishment - 127,400
---------- ----------
Total Adjustments 602 129,824
Increase (Decrease) in Liabilities
Accounts payable (12,226) 800
Other liabilities - (127,400)
---------- ----------
Net cash used
by operating activities (31,462) -
Cash Flows From Investing Activities - -
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Proceeds from Shareholders issued notes 24,814 -
Proceeds from issuance of common stock 7,000 -
---------- ----------
Net cash provided by
Financing Activities 31,814 -
---------- ----------
Net Cash Provided from All Activities 352 -
Cash - beginning of period 481 -
---------- ----------
Cash at end of period $ 831 $ -
========== ==========
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest $ - $ -
Income taxes $ - $ -
Non cash financing transactions:
Shares for services $ 602 $ 208
Shares for debt extinguishment $ 0 $ 127,400
See notes to financial statements.
F-12
Starfest, Inc.
Notes To Financial Statements
March 31, 2000 and March 31, 1999
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
------------------------------------------
(a) Starfest, Inc. (the Company), a California corporation, was incorporated
on August 18, 1993 as Fanfest, Inc. In August, 1995 the Company changed its name
to Starfest, Inc. During 1998, the Company was inactive, just having minimal
administrative expenses. During 1999 the Company attempted to pursue operations
in the online adult entertainment field. There were no revenues from this
endeavor. The Company is negotiating an agreement with a copy (see Note 3). The
purpose of the merger is to effect an online communication retrieval system such
as e-mail via the telephone.
(b) Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market accounts and
in investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. There
were no cash equivalents for the three months ended March 31, 2000 and March 31,
1999.
(c) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principals requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(d) Issuance of Shares for Services
Valuation of shares for services is based on the estimate fair market
value of the services performed.
(e) Income Taxes
The Company's uses the liability method of accounting for income tax
specified by SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes", whereby deferred tax
liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between financial
statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in
effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred
tax assets are recognized and measured based on the likelihood of realization of
the related tax benefit in the future. The Company had no material net deferred
tax assets or liabilities at March 31, 2000 and March 31, 1999.
F-13
Starfest, Inc.
Notes To Financial Statements
March 31, 2000 and March 31, 1999
(f) Loss Per Share
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
issued SFAS No. 128 "Earnings Per Share." The statement replaced primary EPS
with basic EPS which is computed by dividing reported earnings available to
common shareholders by weighted average shares outstanding. The provision
requires the calculation of diluted EPS. The company uses the method specified
by the statement.
2. ADVERTISING
-----------
Advertising is expensed as incurred.
3. MERGER NEGOTIATIONS
-------------------
On January 26, 2000 the Company entered into an agreement of merger with
Concierge, Inc., a Nevada corporation, pursuant to which, should the merger be
approved by the shareholders of both companies, the presently outstanding
1,376,380 shares of common stock of Concierge, Inc. will be converted into
shares of common stock of the Company on the basis of 70,44470.444 shares of Starfest,
Inc. to be issued for each share of Concierge, Inc. Concierge, Inc. does not
have significant assets or revenues.
The proposed merger of Starfest, Inc. and Concierge, Inc. will result in
a reverse acquisition, i.e. the acquisition of Starfest, Inc. by Concierge, Inc.
as Concierge, Inc. will have the controlling voting rights of the combined
entity.
F-18
STARFEST, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 1999
Pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") dated
March 6, 2000 between (1) MAS Capital, Inc., an Indiana corporation, the
controlling shareholder of MAS Acquisition XX Corp. ("MAS XX"), an Indiana
corporation and (2) Starfest, Inc. approximately 96.83 percent (8,250,000
shares) of the outstanding shares of common stock of MAS Acquisition XX Corp.
were exchanged for $100,000 and 150,000 shares of common stock of Starfest, Inc.
in a transaction in which Starfest, Inc. became the parent corporation of
MAS XX. MAS Capital, Inc. and MAS Acquisition XX Corp. do not have significant
assets or revenues.
Upon execution of the Purchase Agreement and the subsequent delivery of
$100,000 cash and 150,000 shares of common stock of Starfest, Inc. on March 7,
2000, to MAS Capital, Inc. pursuant to Rule 12g-3(a) of the General Rules and
Regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Starfest, Inc. became the
successor issuer to MAS Acquisition XX Corp. for reporting purposes under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and elected to report under the Act
effective March 7, 2000.
The merger transaction with MAS Acquisition XX Corp. is considered to be
a capital transaction (i.e. the issuance of stock of MAS Acquisition XX Corp.
accompanied by a recapitalization).
F-19
Starfest, Inc. and Subsidiary
Balance Sheet
(Unaudited)
June 30, 2001
Assets
------
Current Assets:
Cash $ 644
----------
$ 644
==========
Liabilities And Shareholders' Deficit
-------------------------------------
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 54,572
Note payable to Concierge, Inc. 100,000
Payable to shareholders 272,568
----------
Total current liabilities 427,140
----------
Shareholders' Deficit:
Common stock, no par value,
65,000,000 shares authorized;
23,100,000 issued and outstanding 2,711,751
Accumulated Deficit (3,138,247)
---------
Total shareholders' deficit (426,496)
---------
$ 644
=========
See notes to financial statements.
F-20
Starfest, Inc. and Subsidiary
Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
Three Months and six months periods Ended June 30
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2001 2000 2001 2000
----------- ----------- ----------- ------------
Revenues $ - $ - $ - $ -
---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
General and Administrative
Expenses 1,809 18,411 17,843 352,137
---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Operating Loss (1,809) (18,411) (17,843) (352,137)
Provision for income
taxes - - 800 800
---------- ---------- ---------- -----------
Net Loss $ (1,809) $ (18,411) $ (18,643) $ (352,937)
========== ========= ========= ==========
Net Loss Per Common
Share - basic and
diluted $ .001 $ .001 $ .001 $ .015
Weighted Average Common
Shares Outstanding
- Basic and diluted 23,100,000 23,063,586 23,100,000 22,921,341
See notes to financial statements.
F-21
Starfest, Inc. and Subsidiary
Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30
2001 2000
--------- ----------
Net Cash From
operating Activities:
Net loss $(18,643) $(352,937)
Adjustments to reconcile
net loss to net cash
used by operating activities:
Shares issued for services - 702
Changes in assets and
liabilities:
Accounts payable 16,612 (1,643)
------- --------
Net cash used by
operating activities (2,031) (353,878)
Cash Flows from Investing
Activities: - -
------- --------
Cash flows from Financing
Activities:
Loans from a related party - 100,000
Loans from shareholders 2,635 247,502
Common stock issued for cash - 7,000
------- --------
Net cash provided by
Financing Activities 2,635 354,502
Increase in Cash 604 624
Cash at beginning of period 40 481
------- --------
Cash at end of period $ 644 $ 1,105
======= ========
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest $ - $ -
Income taxes $ - $ -
Non cash financing transactions:
Shares for services $ - $ 702
See notes to financial statements.
F-22
Starfest, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes To Unaudited Financial Statements
June 30, 2001 and 2000
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of operations
Starfest, Inc. (the Company), a California corporation, was incorporated on
August 18, 1993 as Fanfest, Inc. In August 1995 the Company changed its
name to Starfest, Inc. During 1998, the Company was inactive, just having
minimal administrative expenses. During 1999 the Company attempted to
pursue operations in the online adult entertainment field. There was no
revenue from this endeavor. The Company is negotiating an agreement with an
entity (see Note 2). The purpose of the merger is to affect an online
communication retrieval system such as e-mail via telephone.
In March 2000, the Company acquired approximately 96.83 percent (8,250,000
shares) of the common stock of MAS Acquisition XX Corp.(MAS XX) for
$314,688. This amount was expensed in March 2000 as at the time of the
acquisition, MAS XX had no assets or liabilities and was inactive. Starfest
is now the parent corporation of MAS XX.
Basis of Preparation:
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission for the presentation of interim
financial information, but do not include all the information and footnotes
required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial
statements. The audited consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2000 was filed on April 2, 2001 with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is hereby referenced. In the opinion of management,
all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
included. Operating results for the three-month and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2001 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Note 2 - Merger Negotiations
On January 26, 2000 the Company entered into an agreement of merger with
Concierge, Inc., a Nevada corporation, pursuant to which, should the merger
be approved by the shareholders of both companies, the presently
outstanding 1,376,380 shares of common stock of Concierge, Inc. will be
converted into shares of common stock of the Company on the basis of 70.444
shares of Starfest, Inc. to be issued for each share of Concierge, Inc. The
Company is registering 96,957,713 shares of its common stock on a Form S-4
to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to be available
should the merger be approved.
4. RELATED PARTY NOTES PAYABLE
---------------------------
PayableF-23
Starfest, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes To Unaudited Financial Statements
June 30, 2001 and 2000
Note 3 - Going concern
The Company's financial statements have been presented on the basis that it
is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the
satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company
incurred a net loss of $18,643 for the six months period ended June 30,
2001. Accumulated deficit amounted to shareholders is non-interest bearing, unsecured with no
specified due date.
5. GOING CONCERN UNCERTAINTIES
---------------------------$3,138,247 at June 30, 2001. At the end of the first quarter (March 31, 2000)June
30, 2001, the Company incurred an
operating losshad shareholders' deficit of (3,224). If management will be unable to generate revenue or
secure adequate financing to do its current business operational plan, there
will be$426,496. These factors,
among others, raise substantial doubt ofas to the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.
The Company, however, believesCompany's management intends to raise additional operating funds
through equity and/or debt offerings. However, there can be no assurance
that its current financing and
reorganization planmanagement will generate the resources required to continue and sustain
its operation indefinitely.
F-14be successful in this endeavor.
F-24
BRAD B. HAYNES 9005 Burton Way
Certified Public Accountant Los Angeles, California 90048
Tel (310) 273-7417
Fax (310) 285-0865
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'SAUDITORS' REPORT
----------------------------
To the Shareholders andThe Board of Directors and Stockholders
Concierge, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Los Angeles, California:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Concierge, Inc. (A Development
Stage Company)(a Nevada
Corporation) (the "Company") as of June 30, 19992000, and the related Statementsstatements of
Operationsoperations, stockholders' equity and Deficit Accumulated, Cash Flows and Changes in Shareholders' Deficitcash flows for the years ended June 30,
19992000 and June 30, 1998 as well as for the period from
September 20, 1996 (inception) to June 30, 1999. TheThese financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the Financial Statementsfinancial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the Financial Statements.financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall Financial Statementfinancial statement presentation.
We believe that our auditaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the Financial Statementsfinancial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Concierge, Inc. (A Development
Stage Company) as of June 30,
1999 and June 30, 1998,2000, and the results of its operations and its cash flows and its changes in shareholders' equity (deficit) for the years then ended and the period from inception until
June 30, 2000 and 1999, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
CompaniesCompany will continue as a going concern. As shown in the financial statements,
the Company's did not earn any revenue during the year ended June 30, 2000 and
1999 and the Company has incurred net losses from inception to June 30, 2000 of
$1,457,729 including net losses of $986,986 and $89,919 during the fiscal years
ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, respectively. These factors, among others, as
discussed in Note 6,3 to the Company
has suffered a current loss from operations and has a capital deficiency to
pursue its projected operation that raisesfinancial statements, raise substantial doubt about
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in
regard to these matters are also described in Note 6.3. The financial statements
do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
/s/ Brad B. Haynes
- --------------------------
Brad B. Haynes
MarchKabani & Company, Inc.
KABANI & COMPANY, INC.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Fountain Valley, California
October 17, 2000
F-15F-25
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
BALANCE SHEET
JuneJUNE 30, 19992000
ASSETS
------
CURRENT ASSETS
- --------------
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash in Bank& cash equivalents $ 6,38385,105
Prepaid Expenses 800245,800
Note Receivable-Related Party 100,000
----------
Total current assets 430,905
PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT, net 4,692
----------
$ 435,597
==========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
------------------------------------
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accrued expenses $ 138,755
Payroll taxes payable 4,400
---------
Total Current Assets $ 7,183
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
(Net of $5,868 depreciation) 5,776
--------
TOTAL ASSETS $12,959
======
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
-------------------------------------
CURRENT LIABILITIES
- -------------------
Accounts Payable - Trade $ 70,093
Accrued Expenses 20,218
Related Party Notes Payable 22,000
---------
Total Current Liabilities $112,311
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICITcurrent liabilities 143,155
COMMITMENTS (SEE NOTES)
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Common Stock, 10,000,000 Shares
Authorized, $.01stock, par value 1,166,326$.01 per share;
10,000,000 shares authorized; issued and
outstanding 11,6631,376,380 13,764
Additional Paid-In Capital 359,728paid in capital 560,617
Advance Subscriptions 1,175,790
Deficit Accumulated Duringaccumulated during the
Development Stage (470,743)
--------development stage (1,457,729)
----------
Total Stockholders' Deficit (99,352)
-------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT $12,959
======stockholders' equity 292,442
----------
$ 435,597
==========
SeeThe accompanying notes to Financial Statements
F-16are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-26
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 & 1999 AND DEFICIT ACCUMULATED For
the Years Ended June 30, 1999 and June 30, 1998 and the Period
From
SeptemberTHE PERIOD FROM
SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 (Inception Date) to June(INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 1999
----------------------------------------------------2000
09-20-96
Year Year (Inception
Ended Ended Date) to
06-30-99 06-30-98 06-30-99
-------- -------- --------SEPTEMBER 20,
JUNE 30, JUNE 30, 1996 (INCEPTION)
2000 1999 TO JUNE 30, 2000
----------- ---------- ----------------
REVENUESREVENUE $ 0- $ 0- $ 0
- --------
COSTS AND EXPENSES
- ------------------
Product Launchlaunch Expenses 490,078 58,607 205,285 357,466847,544
General and& Administrative Expenses 496,108 30,512 77,806 110,877
-------- -------- --------606,985
---------- ---------- ----------
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES 986,186 89,119 283,091 468,343
(LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS (89,119) (283,091) (468,343)
- ----------------------
PROVISION FOR1,454,529
NET LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES (986,186) (89,119) (1,454,529)
---------- --------- -----------
Provision of Income Taxes 800 800 2,400
- -------------------------- --------3,200
---------- --------- --------------------
NET LOSS (986,986) (89,919) (283,891) 470,743
- -------- ========(1,457,729)
========== ========= =========
DEFICIT ACCUMULATED DURING THE
- ------------------------------
DEVELOPMENT STAGE - beginning (380,824) (96,933)
- ----------------- -------- ---------
DEFICIT ACCUMULATED DURING THE
- ------------------------------
DEVELOPMENT STAGE - end (470,743) (380,824)
- -----------------===========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
OUTSTANDING, BASIC AND DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE
- ----------------------------------
NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING 1,061,938 853,410 1,061,938
- -----------------------------------1,065,960 994,077 1,166,965
========== ========= ========= ====================
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE $ (.08)(0.93) $ ( .33)(0.09) $ (.44)
- ---------------------------(1.25)
========== ========= ========= =========
DILUTED LOSS PER COMMON SHARE $ (.08) $ ( .33) $ (.44)
- ----------------------------- ========= ========= ====================
SeeThe accompanying notes to Financial Statements
F-17are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-27
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT For
the Years Ended June 30, 1999 and June 30, 1998 and the Period From
SeptemberSTOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 (Inception Date) to June(INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 1999
----------------------------------------------------2000.
Common Stock
-----------------------------------------
Number of Par Additional Paid-InAdvance Accumulated Shareholders'
Shares AmountStockholders'
shares value Paid In Capital Subscriptions Deficit Equity (deficit)
--------- ------ ----------------- --------------- ------------- ----------- -------------
Common Stock Issued for----------------
Cash Through
Common Stock issued for cash
through June 30, 1997 176,306 $1,763 $ 1,763 $106,162106,162 $ 0 $107,925- $ - $ 107,925
Common Stock Issuedstock issued for Services Throughservices
through June 30, 1997 621,545 6,215 0 0- - - 6,215
Net Loss Throughloss through June 30, 1997 0 0 0- - - (96,933) (96,933)
--------- ------- -------- ---------- -------------- -------------- ------------- ----------- ---------------
Balance at June 30, 1997 797,851 7,978 106,162 - (96,933) 17,207
Common Stock Issuedissued for Cashcash
in the Fiscal Year
Endedyear ended June 30, 1998 137,475 1,375 194,650 0- - 196,025
Common Stock Issuedstock issued for Servicesservices
in the Fiscal Year
Endedyear ended June 30, 1998 22,550 226 0 0- - - 226
Net Loss Incurred Duringloss for the Fiscal Year Endedyear ended June 30, 1998 0 0 0- - - - (283,891) (283,891)
--------- ------- -------- ---------- --------------- -------------- ------------- ----------- ---------------
Balance at June 30, 1998 957,876 $ 9,579 $300,812 $ (380,824) $ (70,433)
Beginning Balance July 1,
1998 957,876 9,579 300,812 - (380,824) (70,433)
Common Stock Issuedissued for Cashcash
in the Year Endedyear ended June 30, 1999 208,000 2,080 58,916 0- - 60,996
Common Stock Issuedstock issued for Servicesservices
in the Year Endedyear ended June 30, 1999 450 4 0 0- - - 4
Net Loss Incurred Duringloss for the Year Endedyear ended June 30, 1999 0 0 0- - - - (89,919) (89,919)
--------- ------- -------- ---------- -------------- -------------- ------------- ----------- ---------------
Balance at June 30, 1999 1,166,326 $11,663 $359,72811,663 359,728 - (470,743) (99,352)
Acquisition and retirement of Common shares (262,000) (2,620) - - - (2,620)
Common Stock issued for cash
in the year ended June 30, 2000 117,184 1,172 200,889 - - 202,061
Common stock issued for services
in the year ended June 30, 2000 354,870 3,549 - - - 3,549
Post acquisition stock subscription funds
received net of costs & expenses of $79,710 - - - 1,175,790 - 1,175,790
Net loss for the year ended June 30, 2000 - - - - (986,986) (986,986)
--------- ------ ------------- ------------- ----------- ---------------
Balance at June 30, 2000 1,376,380$ 13,764 $ (470,743) $(99,352)560,617 $ 1,175,790 $(1,457,729) $ 292,442
========= ======= ======== ========== ============== ============= ============= =========== ===============
SeeThe accompanying notes to Financial Statements
F-18are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-28
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended JuneYEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 & 1999 and June 30, 1998 and the Period From
SeptemberAND THE PERIOD FROM
SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 (Inception Date) to June(INCEPTION) TO JUNE 30, 1999
----------------------------------------------------2000
09-20-96
Year Ended Year Ended (Inception Date)
06-30-99 06-30-98 to 06-30-99SEPTEMBER 20,
JUNE 30, JUNE 30, 1996 (INCEPTION)
2000 1999 TO JUNE 30, 2000
---------- ------------------- ----------------
CASH FLOWFLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
- -----------------------------------ACTIVITIES:
Net Loss $ (89,919) $(283,891) $(470,743)(986,986) $(89,919) $ (1,457,729)
Adjustments to reconcile Net Loss:
To Net Cash Used by Operating
Activities:net loss to
net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 2,350 2,329 2,329 5,8688,218
Stock issued for Services - - 6,441
-------- -------- --------
Total Adjustments 2,329 2,329 12,309
(INCREASE) DECREASE IN ASSETS
- -----------------------------
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN LIABILITIES
- ----------------------------------services 929 4 7,374
(Increase) / decrease in current assets:
Prepaid Expenses (245,000) - (800) (800)(245,800)
Other Assets - 1,625 (1,625) -
Increase / (decrease) in current liabilities:
Accounts Payable (70,093) 5,717 64,376 70,093-
Accrued Expensesexpenses 118,537 10,784 9,435 20,218
Loans from Shareholders138,755
Payroll taxes payable 4,400 - - 12,000
-------- -------- --------
NET CASH USED BY OPERATING
ACTIVITIES $ (69,464) $(210,176) $(356,923)
-4,400
---------- --------- -------------
Net cash used in operating activities (1,175,863) (69,460) (1,544,782)
---------- --------- -------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Note receivable - -------------------------
ACTIVITIESrelated party (100,000) - (100,000)
Acquisition of property & equipment (1,266) - (12,910)
---------- Purchase of Office Furniture
and Equipment-------- -------------
Net cash used in investing activities (101,266) - (4,396) $ (11,644)(112,910)
---------- -------- -------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING - -------------------------
ACTIVITIES
- ----------ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock 61,000 196,251 364,950Shares 202,061 60,996 567,007
Proceeds from Related Party
Borrowingadvance subscriptions 1,255,500 - 1,255,500
Costs and expenses of advance subscription (79,710) - (79,710)
Proceeds from (repayments of) related party loans (22,000) 10,000 12,000 10,000-
---------- -------- ------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 1,355,851 70,996 1,742,797
---------- -------- --------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING
- ------------------------------
ACTIVITIES 71,000 208,251 374,950
- ----------------------
NET INCREASE IN CASH 78,722 1,536 (6,321)85,105
CASH, BEGINNING BALANCE 6,383 4,847 -
------------------------------ --------- -------------
CASH, - Beginning of Period 4,847 11,169 -
- ---- -------- -------- --------
CASH - End of YearENDING BALANCE $ 85,105 $ 6,383 $ 4,848 $ 6,383
- ----85,105
========== ========= =============
SeeThe accompanying notes to Financial Statements
F-19are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-29
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JuneJUNE 30, 2000 AND 1999
1. NATUREDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS
--------------------BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Concierge, Inc. ("the Company"), is a development stage companyenterprise incorporated
in the state of Nevada on September 20, 1996. The company isCompany has undertaken the
development and marketing of a new technology, a unified messaging product "The
Personal Communications Attendant" ("PCA(TM)"). "PCA(TM)" will provide a means
by which the user of Internet e-mail can have e-mail messages spoken to him/her
over any touch-tone telephone or wireless phone in the processworld. The accounting
policies of developing
Softwarethe Company are in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles and conform to provide local telecommunication/internet service andthe standards applicable to provide long distance telecommunications as well as sales of cellular
units. The Company has generated no revenues.development stage
companies.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
------------------------------------------
(a) Cash Equivalents
----------------
Cashand cash equivalents
consist of funds invested in money market
accounts andThe Company considers all liquid investments with a maturity of three months or
less when purchased. There were nofrom the date of purchase that are readily convertible into cash equivalents for the fiscal
years ended June 30, 1999.
(b)to be cash
equivalents.
Use of Estimates
----------------estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principalsprinciples requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts reported
inof assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
accompanying notes.the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Property & Equipment
Property and equipment is carried at cost. Depreciation of property and
equipment is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful
lives of the assets. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to
expense as incurred.
Income taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences
between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities that
will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted laws
and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to
affect taxable income (loss). Valuation allowance is established when necessary
to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Basic and diluted net loss per share
Net loss per share is calculated in accordance with the Statement of financial
accounting standards No. 128 (SFAS No. 128), "Earnings per share". SFAS No. 128
superseded Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.15 (APB 15). Net loss per
share for all periods presented has been restated to reflect the adoption of
SFAS No. 128. Basic net loss per share is based upon the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per share is based on the
assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted
or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under
this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning
of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained
thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during
the period.
F-30
CONCIERGE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2000 AND 1999
Stock-based compensation
In October 1995, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation". SFAS No. 123 prescribes accounting and reporting standards for
all stock-based compensation plans, including employee stock options, restricted
stock, employee stock purchase plans and stock appreciation rights. SFAS No. 123
requires compensation expense to be recorded (i) using the new fair value method
or (ii) using the existing accounting rules prescribed by Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for stock issued to employees" (APB 25) and
related interpretations with proforma disclosure of what net income and earnings
per share would have been had the Company adopted the new fair value method. The
Company adopted this standard in 1998 and the implementation of this standard
did not have any impact on its financial statements.
Fair value of financial instruments
Statement of financial accounting standard No. 107, Disclosures about fair value
of financial instruments, requires that the Company disclose estimated fair
values of financial instruments. The carrying amounts reported in the statements
of financial position for current assets and current liabilities qualifying as
financial instruments are a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Comprehensive income
Statement of financial accounting standards No. 130, Reporting comprehensive
income (SFAS No. 130), establishes standards for reporting and display of
comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances. Comprehensive
income is defined to include all changes in equity, except those resulting from
investments by owners and distributions to owners. Among other disclosures, SFAS
No. 130 requires that all items that are required to be recognized under current
accounting standards as components of comprehensive income be reported in
financial statements that are displayed with the same prominence as other
financial statements. The Company adopted this standard in 1998 and the
implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on its financial
statements.
Reporting segments
Statement of financial accounting standards No. 131, Disclosures about segments
of an enterprise and related information (SFAS No. 131), which superceded
statement of financial accounting standards No. 14, Financial reporting for
segments of a business enterprise, establishes standards for the way that public
enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial
statements and requires reporting of selected information about operating
segments in interim financial statements regarding products and services,
geographic areas and major customers. SFAS No. 131 defines operating segments as
components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is
available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in
deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performances. The Company
adopted this standard in 1998 and the implementation of this standard did not
have a material impact on its financial statements.
F-31
CONCIERGE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2000 AND 1999
Pension and other benefits
In February 1998, the Financing accounting standards board issued statement of
financial accounting standards No. 132, Employers' disclosures about pension and
other post-retirement benefits (SFAS No. 132), which standardizes the disclosure
requirements for pension and other post -retirement benefits. The Company
adopted this standard in 1998 and the implementation of this standard did not
have any impact on its financial statements.
Accounting for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal
use
In March 1998, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants (ASEC of AICPA) issued Statement of
position (SOP) No. 98-1, "Accounting for the costs of computer software
developed or obtained for internal use", effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 1998. SOP N0. 98-1 requires that certain costs of computer
software developed or obtained for internal use be capitalized and amortized
over the useful life of the related software. The Company adopted this standard
in fiscal 1999 and the implementation of this standard did not have a material
impact on its financial statements.
Web site development costs
In March 2000, the Emergency Issues Task Force (EITF) of FASB issued its
consensus under EITF-00-02. Per the consensus, certain costs incurred in the
development of a Web site should be capitalized. According to the EITF, those
costs incurred in developing a software program should be capitalized in
accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) 98-1, "Accounting for the costs of
Computer Software Developed or obtained for internal use". Capitalization of
software development costs begins upon the establishment of technological
feasibility. The establishment of technological feasibility and the ongoing
assessment of recoverability of capitalized software development costs require
considerable judgment by management with respect to certain external factors,
including, but not limited to, anticipated future revenues, estimated economic
life, and changes in software and hardware technologies. The Company expenses
web site development costs, which are allocated for preliminary project
development, web site general and maintenance.
F-32
CONCIERGE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2000 AND 1999
Costs of start-up activities
In April 1998, the ASEC of AICPA issued SOP No. 98-5, "Reporting on the costs of
start-up activities", effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
1998. SOP 98-5 requires the costs of start-up activities and organization costs
to be expensed as incurred. The Company adopted this standard in fiscal 1999 and
the implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on its
financial statements.
Research and Development
Expenditures for software development costs and research are expensed as
incurred. Such costs are required to be expensed until the point that
technological feasibility is established. The period between achieving
technological feasibility and the general availability of such software has been
short. Consequently, costs otherwise capitalizable after technological
feasibility is achieved are generally expensed because they are insignificant.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognized when earned. The Company's revenue
recognition policies are in compliance with all applicable accounting
regulations, including American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, and SOP
98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, With Respect to Certain Transactions. Revenue
from license programs is recorded when the software has been delivered and the
customer is invoiced. Revenue from packaged product sales to and through
distributors and resellers is recorded when related products are shipped.
Maintenance and subscription revenue is recognized ratably over the contract
period. Revenue attributable to undelivered elements, including technical
support and Internet browser technologies, is based on the average sales price
of those elements and is recognized ratably on a straight-line basis over the
product's life cycle. When the revenue recognition criteria required for
distributor and reseller arrangements are not met, revenue is recognized as
payments are received. Costs related to insignificant obligations, which include
telephone support for certain products, are accrued. Provisions are recorded for
returns, concessions and bad debts. Cost of revenue includes direct costs to
produce and distribute product and direct costs to provide online services,
consulting, product support, and training and certification of system
integrators. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. The
company did not earn revenue in the years ended June 30, 2000 and 1999.
Allowance for doubtful accounts
In determining the allowance to be maintained, management evaluates many factors
including industry and historical loss experience. The allowance for doubtful
accounts is maintained at an amount management deems adequate to cover estimated
losses. The company did not have accounts receivable or allowance for doubtful
accounts as of June 30, 2000 and 1999.
F-33
CONCIERGE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2000 AND 1999
Advertising
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred.
Accounting developments
In June 1998, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for derivative
instruments and hedging activities", effective for fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 1999, which has been deferred to June 30, 2000 by publishing of SFAS
No. 137. SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for
derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in
other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives), and for hedging
activities. This statement requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as
either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial condition and measure
those instruments at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of
a derivative instrument depends on its intended use and the resulting
designation. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this standard will
have a material impact on its financial statements.
In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin ("SAB") 101, "Revenue Recognition," which outlines the basic criteria
that must be met to recognize revenue and provides guidance for presentation of
revenue and for disclosure related to revenue recognition policies in financial
statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The effective date
of this pronouncement is the fourth quarter of the fiscal year beginning after
December 15, 1999. The Company believes that adopting SAB 101 will not have a
material impact on its financial position and results of operations.
In March 2000, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 44 ("FIN 44") "Accounting
for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of APB
Opinion No. 25". FIN 44 clarifies the application of Opinion 25 for (a) the
definition of employee for purposes of applying Opinion 25, (b) the criteria for
determining whether a plan qualifies as a noncompensatory plan, (c) Issuancethe
accounting consequence for various modifications to the terms of Sharesa previously
fixed stock option or award, and (d) the accounting for Service
------------------------------an exchange of stock
compensation awards in a business combination. FIN 44 is effective July 1, 2000,
but certain provisions cover specific events that occur after either December
15, 1998,or January 12, 2000. The adoption of certain other provisions of FIN 44
prior to March 31, 2000 did not have a material effect on the financial
statements. The Company does not expect that the adoption of the remaining
provisions will have a material effect on the financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current
year presentation.
F-34
CONCIERGE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2000 AND 1999
3. GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles which contemplate continuation of the
Company as a going concern. However, the Company's did not earn any revenue
during the year ended June 30, 2000 and 1999 and the Company has incurred net
losses from inception to June 30, 2000 of $1,457,729 including net losses of
$986,986 and $89,919 during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2000 and 1999,
respectively. The continuing losses have adversely affected the liquidity of the
Company. Losses are expected to continue for the immediate future. The Company
faces continuing significant business risks, including but not limited to, its
ability to maintain vendor and supplier relationships by making timely payments
when due.
In view of the matters described in the preceding paragraph, recoverability of a
major portion of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying balance
sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which in turn is
dependent upon the Company's ability to raise additional capital, obtain
financing and to succeed in its future operations. The financial statements do
not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of
recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might
be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Management has taken the following steps to revise its operating and financial
requirements, which it believes are sufficient to provide the Company with the
ability to continue as a going concern. Management devoted considerable effort
during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2000 and 1999, towards (i) obtaining
additional equity (ii) management of accrued expenses and accounts payable (iii)
Development of the software "PCA(TM)" and (vi) evaluation of its distribution
and marketing methods.
Management believes that the above actions will allow the Company to continue
operations through the next fiscal year.
4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
June 30, 2000
----------------
Property and Equipment $12,910
Less: Accumulated depreciation 8,218
$ 4,692
===========
5. PREPAID EXPENSES
The Company entered into software license agreements with two Delaware
Corporations. One Corporation granted permission to the Company to utilize its
software for the "PCA(TM)" development. The Corporation was paid $202,500 as
initial non-refundable license fee and was considered to be pre-paid royalties.
The agreement calls for Concierge, Inc. to pay a royalty of $1.00 for the first
million units sold and $.75 for units greater than 1,000,000.
The second software license agreement granted the Company the rights to
incorporate its software in the Company's personal communication attendant
e-mail device. The Corporation was paid $42,500 by Concierge, Inc. as a
non-refundable, advance royalty payment. The agreement calls for the Company to
pay a royalty of $1.10 for the first 100,000 units, thereafter $.85 per unit.
F-35
CONCIERGE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2000 AND 1999
6. NOTE RECEIVABLE - RELATED PARTY
The Company has loaned $100,000 to a Corporation with which the Company is
planning to merge (see note 9). The Note is due on demand, unsecured and is
non-interest bearing.
7. INCOME TAXES
No provision was made for Federal income tax since the Company has significant
net operating loss carryforwards. Through June 30, 2000, the Company incurred
net operating losses for tax purposes of approximately $1,450,000. Differences
between financial statement and tax losses consist primarily of amortization
allowance were immaterial at June 30, 2000. The net operating loss carryforwards
may be used to reduce taxable income through the year 2015. Net operating loss
for carryforwards for the State of California are generally available to reduce
taxable income through the year 2005. The availability of the Company's net
operating loss carryforwards are subject to limitation if there is a 50% or more
positive change in the ownership of the Company's stock. The provision for
income taxes consists of the state minimum tax imposed on corporations.
The net deferred tax asset balance as of June 30, 2000 was approximately
$580,000. A 100% valuation allowance has been established against the deferred
tax assets, as the utilization of the loss carryforwards can not reasonably be
assured.
8. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
The Company issued 117,184 shares for cash totaling $202,061 and 354,870 shares
for services of $3,549 during the year ended June 30, 2000. During the year
ended June 30, 2000, the Company also reacquired and cancelled 262,000 shares,
previously issued for services of $2,620 in the year ended June 30, 1997.
F-36
CONCIERGE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2000 AND 1999
9. ADVANCE SUBSCRIPTIONS
The Company has entered into subscription agreements to issue "post merger"
shares in exchange for cash. Through June 30, 2000, the Company has received
advanced subscriptions for a gross amount of $1,255,500 before deducting
associated costs of $79,710, for 5,928,750 post merger shares. In the event the
merger between Concierge, Inc. and Starfest, Inc. is not completed prior to
November 30, 2000 the obligation of the Company under this agreement may be
satisfied by the issuance of shares in the Company equivalent on a pro-rata
basis to the number of shares in "post merger" Corporation that are subject to
this agreement. As mentioned in Note 10, the Company is involved in a proposed
merger transaction with Starfest, Inc. ("SFI"). SFI filed a registration
statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("the Commission") on June
8, 2000 related to the proposed merger, naming the Company as the entity
proposed to be merged into SFI. From July 1, 2000 through September 15, 2000,
the Company received additionally $487,500 as advance subscription for 2,127,500
post merger shares in an offering intended to be exempt from registration
pursuant to the provisions of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and of
Regulation D, Rule 506 of the Commission. It is possible, but not certain, that
the filing of the registration statement by SFI and the manner in which the
Company conducted the sale of the 2,127,500 post merger shares of common stock
constituted "general advertising or general solicitation" by the Company.
General advertising and general solicitation are activities that are prohibited
when conducted in connection with an offering intended to be exempt from
registration pursuant to the provisions of Regulation D, Rule 506 of the
Commission. The Company does not concede that there was no exemption from
registration available for this offering. Nevertheless, should the
aforementioned circumstances have constituted general advertising or general
solicitation, the Company would be denied the availability of Regulation D, Rule
506 as an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of
1933 when it sold the 2,127,500 post merger shares of common stock after June 8,
2000. Should no exemption from registration have been available with respect to
the sale of these shares, the persons who bought them - as well as all persons
who bought shares of Concierge earlier under circumstances whereby their
purchases would be deemed to be part of the same offering under the Commission's
rules on the integration of securities' offerings - would be entitled, under the
Securities Act of 1933 and possibly under the securities laws of the states in
which such persons bought the securities, to the return of their subscription
amounts if actions to recover such monies should be filed within one year after
the sales in question. The financial statements for the year ended June 30,
2000, do not reflect any such amount since the Company received $487,500 as
advance subscription for 2,127,500 post merger shares after June 30, 2000.
10. MERGER AGREEMENT
On January 19, 2001 the Company entered into an amended agreement of merger with
Starfest, Inc., a California Corporation. Under the agreement, all outstanding
shares of common stock of the Company (which includes 1,376,380 shares
outstanding at September 30, 2000 and 114,364 shares issued in January, 2001)
shall be converted into 96,957,713 common stock of Starfest, Inc. on the basis
of 65.0398 shares of Starfest, Inc. for each share outstanding of the Company.
The 96,957,713 post merger shares shall be distributed to the shareholders of
the Company on a pro-rata basis. The transaction will be accounted for as
reverse merger and is subject to approval by shareholders of both companies and
Securities and Exchange Commission.
F-37
CONCIERGE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2000 AND 1999
11. SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS
The Company prepares its statements of cash flows using the indirect method as
defined under the Financial Accounting Standard No. 95.
The Company paid $1,600 and $0 for income tax in the year ended June 30, 2000
and 1999, respectively. Total amount paid for income taxes from September 20,
1996 (inception) through June 30, 2000 amounted to $2,400. The Company paid $
4,227 and $0 for interest during the years ended June 30, 2000 and 1999,
respectively. Total amount paid for interest from September 20, 1996 (inception)
through June 30, 2000, amounted to $4,227.
The Cashflow statements do not include effect of issuance of 354,870 shares for
$3,549 in the year ended June 30, 2000, and 450 shares for $4 in the year ended
June 30, 1999, in exchange of services rendered to the Company. The Cash flow
statements do not include effect of acquisition and cancellation of 262,000
shares issued for services of $2,620. 737,415 shares have been issued since
inception through June 30, 2000, for services amounting $7,374. Valuation of
shares is based on the estimated fair market value of the services performed.
12. COMMITMENT
The Company sub-leases office space in Los Angeles, California from Ardent, Ltd.
The term of the lease is 26 months with monthly payments of $1541.71. The lease
expires on August 31, 2002. Rent was $7,823 and $11,560 for the year ended June
30, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Future minimum lease payments associated with
the lease is as follows:
Year ended June 30 Amount
------------------ ----------
2001 $ 18,501
2002 18,501
2003 3,083
----- ----------
Total $ 40,085
===== ==========
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In January, 2001, the Company issued 114,364 shares of common stock to persons
who had paid $1,743,000 for securities characterized as "advance subscriptions,"
which includes $1,175,790 shown as "advance subscriptions" in the financial
statements at June 30, 2000, as well as "advance subscriptions" sold after June
30, 2000. (See Note 9 above.)
F-38
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
BALANCE SHEET
MARCH 31, 2001
(UNAUDITED)
ASSETS
------
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash & cash equivalents. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,346
Prepaid Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245,800
Note Receivable - Related Party. . . . . . . . . . . 100,000
------------
Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347,146
PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT, net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,884
------------
$ 350,030
============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
-------------------------------------
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 75,553
Loan payable-Officer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,000
------------
Total current liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . 97,553
COMMITMENTS (SEE NOTES)
SUBSCRIPTIONS RECEIVED FOR COMMON STOCK
SUBJECT TO CONTINGENCY . . . . . . . . . . . 1,663,290
COMMON STOCK ISSUED SUBJECT TO CONTINGENCY . . . . . . 346,320
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 10,000,000
shares authorized; issued and outstanding 1,376,380. 8,558
Additional paid in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219,503
Deficit accumulated during the development stage . . (1,985,194)
------------
Total stockholders' deficit. . . . . . . . . . . . (1,757,133)
------------
$ 350,030
============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-39
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2001 & 2000 AND THE PERIOD FROM
SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 (INCEPTION) TO MARCH 31, 2001
(UNAUDITED)
SEPTEMBER 20, 1996
MARCH 31, MARCH 31, (INCEPTION) TO
2001 2000 MARCH 31, 2001
-------------------- ----------- ----------------
REVENUE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ - $ - $ -
COSTS AND EXPENSES
Product launch Expenses. . . . . . . . 241,928 155,666 1,089,472
General & Administrative Expenses. . . 284,737 91,440 891,722
-------------------- ----------- ----------------
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES . . . . . . . 526,665 247,106 1,981,194
-------------------- ----------- ---------------
NET LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES . . . . . . (526,665) (247,106) (1,981,194)
Provision of Income Taxes. . . . . . . 800 800 4,000
-------------------- ----------- ----------------
NET LOSS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (527,465) (247,906) (1,985,194)
==================== =========== ================
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
OUTSTANDING, BASIC AND DILUTED 1,376,380 985,125 1,376,380
==================== =========== ================
BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE . . $ (0.38) $ (0.25) $ (1.44)
==================== =========== ================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-40
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2001 & 2000 AND THE PERIOD FROM
SEPTEMBER 20, 1996 (INCEPTION) TO MARCH 31, 2001
(UNAUDITED)
SEPTEMBER 20, 1996
MARCH 31, MARCH 31, (INCEPTION) TO
2001 2000 MARCH 31, 2001
-------------------- ----------- ----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (527,465) $ (247,906) $ (1,985,194)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . 1,808 1,164 10,026
Stock issued for services . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - 7,374
(Increase) / decrease in current assets:
Prepaid Expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - (245,800)
Increase / (decrease) in current liabilities:
Accounts payable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (3,250) -
Accrued expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (67,602) 2,543 75,553
-------------------- ----------- ----------------
Net cash used in operating activities . . . . . . . (593,259) (247,449) (2,138,041)
-------------------- ----------- ----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Note receivable - related party . . . . . . . . . . - - (100,000)
Acquisition of property & equipment . . . . . . . . - - (12,910)
-------------------- ----------- ----------------
Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . - - (112,910)
-------------------- ----------- ----------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from borrowing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,000 (5,000) 22,000
Proceeds from Issuance of Shares. . . . . . . . . . - 130,918 567,007
Proceeds from advance subscriptions . . . . . . . . - - 1,255,500
Proceeds from subscriptions of common
stock subject to contingency . . . . . . . . . 487,500 - 487,500
Costs and expenses of advance subscription. . . . . - - (79,710)
-------------------- ----------- ----------------
Net cash provided by financing activities . . . . . 509,500 125,918 2,252,297
-------------------- ----------- ----------------
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH . . . . . . . . . . . . (83,759) (121,531) 1,346
CASH, BEGINNING BALANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85,105 6,383 -
------------------- ----------- ----------------
CASH, ENDING BALANCE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,346 $ (115,148) $ 1,346
==================== =========== ================
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-41
CONCIERGE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2001 AND 2000
(UNAUDITED)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Concierge, Inc. ("the Company"), is a development stage enterprise incorporated
in the state of Nevada on September 20, 1996. The Company has undertaken the
development and marketing of a new technology, a unified messaging product "The
Personal Communications Attendant" ("PCA "). "PCA " will provide a means by
which the user of Internet e-mail can have e-mail messages spoken to him/her
over any touch-tone telephone or wireless phone in the world. The accounting
policies of the Company are in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles and conform to the standards applicable to development stage
companies.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all liquid investments with a maturity of three months or
less from the date of purchase that are readily convertible into cash to be cash
equivalents.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Property & Equipment
Property and equipment is carried at cost. Depreciation of property and
equipment is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful
lives of the assets. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to
expense as incurred.
Income taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed annually for differences
between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities that
will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted laws
and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to
affect taxable income (loss). Valuation allowance is established when necessary
to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Basic and diluted net loss per share
Net loss per share is calculated in accordance with the Statement of financial
accounting standards No. 128 (SFAS No. 128), "Earnings per share". SFAS No. 128
superseded Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.15 (APB 15). Net loss per
F-42
CONCIERGE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2001 AND 2000
(UNAUDITED)
share for all periods presented has been restated to reflect the adoption of
SFAS No. 128. Basic net loss per share is based upon the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding. Diluted net loss per share is based on the
assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted
or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under
this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning
of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained
thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during
the period.
Stock-based compensation
In October 1995, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation". SFAS No. 123 prescribes accounting and reporting standards for
all stock-based compensation plans, including employee stock options, restricted
stock, employee stock purchase plans and stock appreciation rights. SFAS No. 123
requires compensation expense to be recorded (i) using the new fair value method
or (ii) using the existing accounting rules prescribed by Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for stock issued to employees" (APB 25) and
related interpretations with proforma disclosure of what net income and earnings
per share would have been had the Company adopted the new fair value method. The
Company uses the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB25 and has opted for
the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123. The implementation of this standard
did not have any material impact on the Company's financial statements.
Issurance of shares for service
Valuation of shares for services is based on the estimated fair market value of
the services performed.
(d) Income Taxes
------------Fair value of financial instruments
Statement of financial accounting standard No. 107, Disclosures about fair value
of financial instruments, requires that the Company disclose estimated fair
values of financial instruments. The Company's usescarrying amounts reported in the liability methodstatements
of accountingfinancial position for income
taxes specified by SFAScurrent assets and current liabilities qualifying as
financial instruments are a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Accounting for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal
use
In March 1998, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants (ASEC of AICPA) issued Statement of
position (SOP) No. 109,98-1, "Accounting for Income Taxes"the costs of computer software
developed or obtained for internal use", whereby deferred tax liabilitieseffective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 1998. SOP N0. 98-1 requires that certain costs of computer
software developed or obtained for internal use be capitalized and assets are determined based
onamortized
over the difference between financial statements and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the
year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred
tax assets are recognized and measured based on the likelihood of
realizationuseful life of the related tax benefitsoftware. The Company adopted this standard
in fiscal 1999 and the implementation of this standard did not have a material
impact on its financial statements.
Web site development costs
In March 2000, the Emergency Issues Task Force (EITF) of FASB issued its
consensus under EITF-00-02. Per the consensus, certain costs incurred in the
future. The Company
had no material net deferred tax assets or liabilities at June
30, 1999.
(e) Property and Equipment
----------------------
Depreciation for equipment and vehicles are computed usingdevelopment of a Web site should be capitalized. According to the straight-line method calculated to depreciate the cost of assets
over the estimated useful lives. Leasehold improvements are
amortized over the life of the original lease. Costs of
maintenance and repairs are charged to expense while costs of
significant renewals and betterments are capitalized.
F-20EITF, those
F-43
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2001 AND 2000
(UNAUDITED)
costs incurred in developing a software program should be capitalized in
accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) 98-1, "Accounting for the costs of
Computer Software Developed or obtained for internal use". Capitalization of
software development costs begins upon the establishment of technological
feasibility. The establishment of technological feasibility and the ongoing
assessment of recoverability of capitalized software development costs require
considerable judgment by management with respect to certain external factors,
including, but not limited to, anticipated future revenues, estimated economic
life, and changes in software and hardware technologies. The Company expenses
web site development costs, which are allocated for preliminary project
development, web site general and maintenance.
Costs of start-up activities
In April 1998, the ASEC of AICPA issued SOP No. 98-5, "Reporting on the costs of
start-up activities", effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
1998. SOP 98-5 requires the costs of start-up activities and organization costs
to be expensed as incurred. The Company adopted this standard in fiscal 1999 and
the implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on its
financial statements.
Research and Development
Expenditures for software development costs and research are expensed as
incurred. Such costs are required to be expensed until the point that
technological feasibility is established. The period between achieving
technological feasibility and the general availability of such software has been
short. Consequently, costs otherwise capitalizable after technological
feasibility is achieved are generally expensed because they are insignificant.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue Recognition Revenue is recognized when earned. The Company's revenue
recognition policies are in compliance with all applicable accounting
regulations, including American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
(AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, and SOP
98-9, Modification of SOP 97-2, With Respect to Certain Transactions. Revenue
from license programs is recorded when the software has been delivered and the
customer is invoiced. Revenue from packaged product sales to and through
distributors and resellers is recorded when related products are shipped.
The Company does not charge monthly service fee, instead charges only one-time
purchase price and the option of buying upgrades. When the revenue recognition
criteria required for distributor and reseller arrangements are not met, revenue
is recognized as payments are received. Costs related to insignificant
obligations, which include telephone support for certain products, are accrued.
Provisions are recorded for returns, concessions and bad debts. Cost of revenue
includes direct costs to produce and distribute product and direct costs to
provide online services, consulting, product support, and training and
certification of system
F-44
CONCIERGE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2001 AND 2000
(UNAUDITED)
integrators. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. The
company did not earn any revenue in the period ended March 31, 2001 and 2000.
Allowance for doubtful accounts
In determining the allowance to be maintained, management evaluates many factors
including industry and historical loss experience. The allowance for doubtful
accounts is maintained at an amount management deems adequate to cover estimated
losses. The company did not have accounts receivable or allowance for doubtful
accounts as of March 31, 2001 and 2000.
Advertising
The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred.
Accounting developments
In June 30, 1999
(f) Loss Per Share
--------------
In February 1997,1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards ("FASB"SFAS") No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and
reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument (including
certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded on the
balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. SFAS
No. 133 requires that changes in the derivative's fair value be recognized
currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. SFAS
No. 133, as amended by SFAS No. 137 and SFAS No. 138, is effective for fiscal
quarters of fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. The Company does not
expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its
financial statements.
In June 2000, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 138, "Accounting for Certain Instruments and Certain Hedging
Activities." The Company does not expect that the adoption of this standard will
have a material impact on its financial statements.
In June 2000, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 139, "Rescission of FASB Statement No. 53 and Amendments to
F-45
CONCIERGE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2001 AND 2000
(UNAUDITED)
Statements No. 63, 89, and 121." The Company does not expect that the
adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its financial
statements.
In September 2000, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125."
The Company does not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a
material impact on its financial statements.
In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") issued
SFASStaff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 128 "Earnings Per Share.101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements." SAB No. 101 summarizes the SEC's views on the application of GAAP
to revenue recognition. In June 2000, the SEC released SAB No. 101B that delays
the implementation date of SAB 101 until no later than the fourth fiscal quarter
of fiscal years b beginning after December 15, 1999. The statement
replaced primary EPSCompany has reviewed
SAB No. 101 and believes that it is in compliance with basic EPSthe SEC's interpretation
of revenue recognition.
In March 2000, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 44 ("FIN 44") "Accounting
for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of APB
Opinion No. 25". FIN 44 clarifies the application of Opinion 25 for (a) the
definition of employee for purposes of applying Opinion 25, (b) the criteria for
determining whether a plan qualifies as a noncompensatory plan, (c) the
accounting consequence for various modifications to the terms of a previously
fixed stock option or award, and (d) the accounting for an exchange of stock
compensation awards in a business combination. FIN 44 is effective July 1, 2000,
but certain provisions cover specific events that occur after either December
15, 1998,or January 12, 2000. The adoption of certain other provisions of FIN 44
prior to March 31, 2000 did not have a material effect on the financial
statements. The Company does not expect that the adoption of the remaining
provisions will have a material effect on the financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current
period presentation.
3. GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles which is computed by dividing
reported earnings availablecontemplate continuation of the
Company as a going concern. However, the Company's did not earn any revenue
during the period ended March 31, 2001 and 2000 and the Company has incurred net
losses from inception to common shareholders by weighted
average shares outstanding.March 31, 2001 of $1,985,194 including a net loss of
$527,465 during the period ended March 31, 2001. The provision requirescontinuing losses have
adversely affected the calculationliquidity of diluted EPS. The company uses the method specified
by the statement.
3. RELATED PARTY NOTES PAYABLE
---------------------------
A promissory note of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) was given to an
individual for funds received by the Company. The interest rate was
fifteen percent per annum payable on demand.
A promissory of Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000) was givenLosses are expected to
an
individualF-46
CONCIERGE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2001 AND 2000
(UNAUDITED)
continue for funds received by the Company. The interest rate was
fifteen percent (15%) per annum. Further consideration for this loan was
the issuance of four hundred and fifty (450) shares of Company shares.
4. ADVERTISING
-----------
Advertising is expensed as incurred.
5. LEASE AGREEMENT
---------------immediate future. The Company is on a month-to-month tenant occupancy.
6. GOING CONCERN UNCERTAINTIES
---------------------------
At the endfaces continuing significant
business risks, including but not limited to, its ability to maintain vendor and
supplier relationships by making timely payments when due.
In view of the current year,matters described in the preceding paragraph, recoverability of a
major portion of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying balance
sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, incurred an operating losswhich in turn is
dependent upon the Company's ability to raise additional capital, obtain
financing and to succeed in its future operations. The financial statements do
not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of
$89,919. If management willrecorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might
be necessary should the Company be unable to generate more revenue or
secure adequate financingcontinue as a going concern.
Management has taken the following steps to dorevise its current business operational plan,
there will be substantial doubt ofoperating and financial
requirements, which it believes are sufficient to provide the Company'sCompany with the
ability to continue as a going concern. Management devoted considerable effort
from inception through the period ended March 31, 2001, towards (i) obtaining
additional equity (ii) management of accrued expenses and accounts payable (iii)
Development of the software "PCA " and (vi) evaluation of its distribution and
marketing methods.
Management believes that the above actions will allow the Company to continue
operations through the next fiscal year.
4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
March 31, 2001
----------------
Property and Equipment $ 12,910
Less: Accumulated depreciation 10,026
----------
$ 2,884
==========
5. PREPAID EXPENSES
The Company however, believesentered into software license agreements with two Delaware
Corporations. One Corporation granted permission to the Company to utilize its
software for the "PCA " development. The corporation was paid $202,500 as
initial non-refundable license fee and was considered to be pre-paid royalties.
The agreement calls for Concierge, Inc. to pay a royalty of $1.00 for the first
million units sold and $.75 for units greater than 1,000,000.
The second software license agreement granted the Company the rights to
incorporate its software in the Company's personal communication attendant
e-mail device. The corporation was paid $42,500 by Concierge, Inc. as a
non-refundable, advance royalty payment. The agreement calls for the Company to
pay a royalty of $1.10 for the first 100,000 units, thereafter $.85 per unit.
The Company amortizes the prepaid royalties by the amount which is the greater
of the amount computed using (a) the ratio that its current financing and reorganization plan will generate the resources requiredgross revenues bear to
continue and sustain its operation indefinitely.
F-21F-47
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 1999
-----------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
------
CURRENT ASSETS
- --------------
Cash in Bank $ 76,383
Prepaid Expenses 800
---------
Total Current Assets $ 77,183
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
- ----------------------
(Net of $7,032 depreciation) 11,644 4,612
--------
TOTAL ASSETS $81,795
=======
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
-------------------------------------
CURRENT LIABILITIES
- -------------------
Accounts Payable - Trade $ 66,843
Accrued Expenses 21,962
Note Payable 12,000
Related Party Note Payable 5,000
---------
Total Current Liabilities $105,805
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
- ---------------------
Common Stock, 10,000,000 Shares
Authorized, $.01 par value,
1,080,076 shares issued
and outstanding 10,800
Additional Paid-In Capital 491,508
Deficit Accumulated During the
Development Stage (526,318)
---------
Total Stockholders' Deficit (24,010)
-------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT $81,795
=======
See accompanying notes to Financial Statements
F-22
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND DEFICIT ACCUMULATED
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Six Months Ended December 31, 1999 and
December 31, 1998 and the Period From
September 20, 1996 (Inception Date) to December 31, 1999
--------------------------------------------------------
09-20-96
Six Months Ended (Inception)
----------------------- -----------
12-31-99 12-31-98 to 12-31-99
-------- -------- -----------
REVENUES $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
- -------- ---------- ---------- ----------
COSTS AND EXPENSES
- ------------------
Product Launch Expenses 8,780 16,682 366,246
General and Administrative
Expenses 45,995 7,104 156,872
---------- ---------- ----------
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES 54,775 23,786 523,118
(LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS (54,775) (23,786) (523,118)
- ----------------------
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES 800 800 3,200
- -------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------
NET LOSS (55,575) (24,586) (526,318)
- --------
DEFICIT ACCUMULATED DURING THE
- ------------------------------
DEVELOPMENT STAGE - beginning (470,743) (380,824)
- ----------------- ---------- ----------
DEFICIT ACCUMULATED DURING THE
- ------------------------------
DEVELOPMENT STAGE - end (526,318) (405,410)
- -----------------
BASIC AND DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE
NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES
OUTSTANDING 1,076,575 957,876 1,076,575
- ----------- ========== ========= ==========
BASIC LOSS PER COMMON SHARE $(.05) $(.25) $(.49)
- --------------------------- ====== ====== ======
DILUTED LOSS PER COMMON SHARE $(.05) $(.25) $(.49)
- ----------------------------- ====== ====== ======
See accompanying notes to Financial Statements
F-23
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
BALANCE SHEET
March 31, 2000
--------------
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
------
CURRENT ASSETS
- --------------
Cash in Bank $ 540,629
Prepaid Expenses 800
-----------
Total Current Assets $ 541,429
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
- ----------------------
(Net of $7,615 depreciation) 4,029
-----------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 545,458
===========
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
------------------------------------
LIABILITIES $ 0
- -----------
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
- --------------------
Common Stock, 10,000,000 Shares
Authorized, $.01 par value,
1,175,410 shares issued
and outstanding 11,754
Additional Paid-In Capital 1,251,555
Deficit Accumulated During the
Development Stage (717,851)
----------
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 545,458
----------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 545,458
==========
See accompanying notes to Financial Statements
F-24
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 and
March 31, 1999 and the Period From
September 20, 1996 (Inception Date) to March 31, 2000
-----------------------------------------------------
09-20-96
Nine Months Ended (Inception)
----------------------- -----------
03-31-00 03-31-99 to 03-31-00
-------- -------- -----------
REVENUES $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
- -------- ---------- ---------- ----------
COSTS AND EXPENSES
- ------------------
Product Launch Expenses 155,665 55,482 527,529
General and Administrative
Expenses 90,640 23,839 187,172
---------- ---------- ----------
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES 246,308 78,321 714,651
(LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS (246,308) (78,321) (714,651)
- ---------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES 800 800 3,200
- -------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------
NET LOSS (247,108) (79,121) (717,851)
- --------
DEFICIT ACCUMULATED DURING THE
- ------------------------------
DEVELOPMENT STAGE - beginning (470,743)
- ----------------- ----------
DEFICIT ACCUMULATED DURING THE
- ------------------------------
DEVELOPMENT STAGE - end (717,851)
- -----------------
See accompanying notes to Financial Statements
F-25
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
For the Interim Nine Months Ended March 31, 2000 and
March 31, 1999 and the Period From
September 20, 1996 (Inception Date) to March 31, 2000
-----------------------------------------------------
09-26-96
Nine Months Ended (Inception)
--------------------- -----------
03-31-00 03-31-99 to 03-31-00
-------- -------- -----------
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
- -----------------------------------
Net Loss $(247,186) $ (79,121) $(717,851)
Adjustments to reconcile Net Loss:
To Net Cash Used by Operating
Activities:
Depreciation 1,746 1,771 7,615
--------- -------- ----------
Total Adjustments (1,746) 1,771 7,615
DECREASE (INCREASE) IN ASSETS
- -----------------------------
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN LIABILITIES
- ----------------------------------
Prepaid Expenses - - (800)
Accounts Payable (70,093) 8,820 -
Accrued Expenses (20,219) 9,429 -
--------- -------- ---------
NET CASH USED BY OPERATING
- --------------------------
ACTIVITIES $(335,672) $ (59,101) $ (711,036)
- ----------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING
- -------------------------
ACTIVITIES
- ----------
Purchase of Office Furniture
and Equipment - - (11,644)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING
- -------------------------
ACTIVITIES
- ----------
Proceeds from Issuance of
Common Stock and Additional
Paid-In Capital 891,918 49,982 1,263,309
Proceeds from Related Party
Borrowing (22,000) 10,000 -
-------- -------- ----------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING
- ------------------------------
ACTIVITIES 869,918 59,982 1,263,309
- ---------- -------- -------- ----------
NET CASH PROVIDED FROM 534,246 (881) 540,629
- ----------------------
ALL ACTIVITIES
- --------------
CASH - Beginning of Period 6,383 4,848 -
- ---- -------- -------- ---------
CASH - End of Period $540,629 $ 5,729 $ 540,629
- ---- ======== ======== =========
Interest Paid $ 3,617 $ 3,617
Interest Paid $ 800 $ 2,400
See accompanying notes to Financial Statements
F-26
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-----------------------------
MarchMARCH 31, 2001 AND 2000
--------------
(Unaudited)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS
--------------------
Concierge, Inc. is a development stage company incorporated in Nevada on
September 20, 1996. The Company is in(UNAUDITED)
the processtotal of developingcurrent and anticipated future gross revenues or (b) the
straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life. Per the
guideline under SFAS 86 "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to provide local telecommunications/internet service andbe
Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed", amortization shall start when the product
is available for general release to provide long
distance telecommunications as well as salescustomers.
The term of cellular units.licenses is five years from the date the Company begins shipping of
its product. The prepaid royalties will be amortized based on straight-line
method over five-year period from the date shipping begins.
6. NOTE RECEIVABLE - RELATED PARTY
The Company has generated no revenue.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
------------------------------------------
(a) Cash Equivalents
----------------
Cash equivalentsloaned $100,000 to a Corporation with which the Company is
planning to merge (see note 9). The Note is due on demand, unsecured and is
non-interest bearing.
7. INCOME TAXES
No provision was made for Federal income tax since the Company has significant
net operating loss carryforwards. Through December 31, 2000, the Company
incurred net operating losses for tax purposes of approximately $1,980,000.
Differences between financial statement and tax losses consist primarily of
funds invested in money market accounts and
investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased.
There were no cash equivalentsamortization allowance, was immaterial at March 31, 2001. The net operating loss
carryforwards may be used to reduce taxable income through the year 2015. Net
operating loss for carryforwards for the interimState of California are generally
available to reduce taxable income through the year 2005. The availability of
the Company's net operating loss carryforwards are subject to limitation if
there is a 50% or more positive change in the ownership of the Company's stock.
The provision for income taxes consists of the state minimum tax imposed on
corporations.
The net deferred tax asset balance as of June 30, 2000 was approximately
$790,000. A 100% valuation allowance has been established against the deferred
tax assets, as the utilization of the loss carrytforwards cannot reasonably be
assured.
8. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
The Company issued 117,184 shares for cash totaling $202,061 and 354,870 shares
for services of $3,549 during the year ended June 30, 2000. During the year
ended June 30, 2000, the Company also reacquired and cancelled 262,000 shares,
previously issued for services of $2,620 in the year ended June 30, 1997.
9. ADVANCE SUBSCRIPTIONS & SUBSCRIPTIONS RECEIVED FOR COMMON STOCK SUBJECT
TO CONTINGENCY
F-48
CONCIERGE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2001 AND 2000
(UNAUDITED)
The Company has entered into subscription agreements to issue "post merger"
shares in exchange for cash. Through December 31, 2000, the Company had received
advance subscriptions for a gross amount of $1,255,500 before deducting
associated costs of $79,710, for 5,928,750 post merger shares. In the event the
merger between Concierge, Inc. and Starfest, Inc. is not completed prior to
November 31, 2000 the obligation of the Company under this agreement may be
satisfied by the issuance of shares in the Company equivalent on a pro-rata
basis to the number of shares in "post merger" Corporation that are subject to
this agreement.
As mentioned in Note 10, the Company is involved in a proposed merger
transaction with Starfest, Inc. ("SFI"). SFI filed a registration statement with
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("the Commission") on June 8, 2000
related to the proposed merger, naming the Company as the entity proposed to be
merged into SFI. From July 1, 2000 through September 15, 2000, the Company
received additionally $487,500 as advance subscription for 2,127,500 post merger
shares in an offering intended to be exempt from registration pursuant to the
provisions of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and of Regulation D,
Rule 506 of the Commission. It is possible, but not certain, that the filing of
the registration statement by SFI and the manner in which the Company conducted
the sale of the 2,127,500 post merger shares of common stock constituted
"general advertising or general solicitation" by the Company. General
advertising and general solicitation are activities that are prohibited when
conducted in connection with an offering intended to be exempt from registration
pursuant to the provisions of Regulation D, Rule 506 of the Commission. The
Company does not concede that there was no exemption from registration available
for this offering. Nevertheless, should the aforementioned circumstances have
constituted general advertising or general solicitation, the Company would be
denied the availability of Regulation D, Rule 506 as an exemption from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 when it sold the
2,127,500 post merger shares of common stock after June 8, 2000. Should no
exemption from registration have been available with respect to the sale of
these shares, the persons who bought them would be entitled, under the
Securities Act of 1933, to the return of their subscription amounts if actions
to recover such monies should be filed within one year after the sales in
question. Accordingly, the amounts received by the Company from the sale of
these shares are set apart from Stockholders' Equity as "Subscription received
for common stock subject to contingency" to indicate this contingency.
The total contingent liabilities related to such shares amounted to $2,009,610
as of March 31, 2001.
10. MERGER AGREEMENT
On January 26, 2000 the Company entered into an agreement of merger with
Starfest, Inc., a California Corporation. Under the agreement, the presently
outstanding 1,376,380 share of common stock of the Company shall be converted
into 96,957,713 common stock of Starfest, Inc. on the basis of 70.444 shares of
Starfest, Inc. for each share outstanding of the Company. The 96,957,713 post
merger shares shall be distributed to the shareholders of the Company on a
pro-rata basis. For accounting purposes, the transaction would be treated as a
F-49
CONCIERGE, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2001 AND 2000
(UNAUDITED)
recapitalization of the Company, with the Company as the accounting acquirer
(reverse acquisition), and would be accounted for in a manner similar to a
pooling of interests. The operations of Starfest, Inc. would be included with
those of the Company from the acquisition date. Starfest, Inc. had minimal
assets and did not have significant operations prior to the acquisition. The
merger is subject to approval by shareholders of both companies and Securities
and Exchange Commission.
11. SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS
The Company prepares its statements of cash flows using the indirect method as
defined under the Financial Accounting Standard No. 95.
The Company paid $0 and $800 for income tax in the period ended March 31, 2001
and 2000, respectively. Total amount paid for income taxes from September 20,
1996 (inception) through March 31, 2001 amounted to $2,400. The Company paid $0
for interest during the periods ended March 31, 20002001 and 2000. Total amount paid
for interest from September 20, 1996 (inception) through March 31, 1999.
(b) Use2001,
amounted to $4,227.
The Cash flow statements do not include effect of Estimates
----------------
The preparationacquisition and cancellation
of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principals requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
(c) Issuance262,000shares issued for services of Shares$2,620. 737,415 shares have been issued
since inception through March 31, 2001, for Service
------------------------------services amounting $7,374. Valuation
of shares for shervices is based on the estimated fair market value of the services performed.
(d) Income Taxes
------------performed
12. COMMITMENT
The Company's usesCompany sub-leases office space in Los Angeles, California from Ardent, Ltd.
The term of the liability methodlease is 26 months with monthly payments of accounting for income taxes
specified by SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes", whereby
deferred tax liabilities$1,541.71. The lease
expires on August 31, 2002. Rent was $12,610 and assets are determined based on the
difference between financial statements and tax bases of assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect$5,006 for the year in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are recognized
and measured based on the likelihood of realization of the related tax
benefit in the future. The Company had no material net deferred tax
assets or liabilities atperiod ended
March 31, 2001 and 2000, and March 31, 1999.
F-27
CONCIERGE, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
-----------------------------
March 31, 2000
--------------
(Unaudited)
(e) Property and Equipment
----------------------
Depreciation for equipment and vehiclesrespectively.
Future minimum lease payments associated with the lease are computed using the
straight-line method calculated to depreciate the cost of assets over
the estimated useful lives. Leasehold improvements are amortized over
the life of the original lease. Costs of maintenance and repairs are
charged to expense while costs of significant renewals and betterments
are capitalized.
(f) Loss Per Share
--------------
In February 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
issued SFAS No. 128 "Earnings Per Share." The statement replaced
primary EPS with basic EPS which is computed by dividing reported
earnings available to common shareholders by weighted average shares
outstanding. The provision requires the calculation of diluted EPS.
The company uses the method specified by the statement.
3. ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL
--------------------------
The Company has entered into subscription agreements to issue "post
acquisition" shares in exchange for case to finance continued product
development and other operational costs. During March, 2000, the Company
received $956,500 based on these agreements. The Company's only obligation
is to issue either "post acquisition" shares, or original Company shares
using a procedure agreed to by both share subscribers and the Company, in
the event the acquisition is not successfully completed. As part of securing
this financing, the Company incurred associated costs of $273,999. Since
the issuance of specific shares are contingent upon future events, the
proceeds have been recorded as additional paid-in capital, net of the costs
of securing the financing.
4. ADVERTISING
-----------
Advertising is expensed as incurred.
5. LEASE AGREEMENT
---------------
The Company is on a month-to-month tenant occupancy.
6. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
----------------------------
The Company maintains all cash in bank deposit accounts, what at times may
exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced a loss in
such accounts.
F-28follow:
Year ended March 31 Amount
---------------------- ------
2001 $ 18,501
2002 7,709
----------
Total $ 26,210
==========
F-50
APPENDIX A
AMENDED AGREEMENT OF MERGER
This Amended Agreement of Merger (the "Agreement") is made and entered
into as of January 26, 200019, 2001 by and among:
STARFEST, Inc., a California corporation ("STARFEST"); and
CONCIERGE, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("CONCIERGE").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, STARFEST's common stock, no par value per share (the "Common
Stock"), is currently traded on the OTC Bulletin Board; and
WHEREAS, STARFEST currently operates an Internet entertainment business;
and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to reorganize STARFEST by merging
CONCIERGE into STARFEST, with STARFEST being the surviving corporation of the
merger; and
WHEREAS, as part of the reorganization, STARFEST wishes to sell its
Internet entertainment business to a third party in order that the sole business
of STARFEST after the merger will be the business of CONCIERGE.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the following representations,
promises and undertakings, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
1. STARFEST merger with CONCIERGE. Promptly after the execution of
this Agreement, the officers and directors of each of STARFEST and CONCIERGE
shall cause all corporate actions to occur, including without limitation the
holding of any required special meeting of the shareholders of each of STARFEST
and CONCIERGE, that are required to approve:
(a) The merger of STARFEST with CONCIERGE, STARFEST to be the
surviving corporation, with the stockholders of CONCIERGE
receiving a total of 78 million96,957,713 shares of Common Stock of
STARFEST in the merger and the stockholders of STARFEST
retaining their presently issued 23 million shares of
Common Stock of STARFEST;
(b) The change of name of the post-merger company to
"CONCIERGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC."
A-1
(c) The change of management of the post-merger company to
that of the directors and officers of CONCIERGE
immediately before the effectiveness of the merger;
A-1
(d) An increase in the authorized capital of the post-merger
corporation to 190 million shares of Common Stock, $0.001
a share, and 10 million shares of Preferred Stock, par
value $0.001 a share;
(e) The authorization of the directors of the post-merger
corporation to issue no more than 9 million shares of
Common Stock (or common stock equivalents or derivatives)
to raise the necessary capital to commence its business
and to attract additional members of management; and
2. Representations by STARFEST. STARFEST represents as follows:
---------------------------
2.1 STARFEST is a corporation duly organized, validly existing
and in good standing under the laws of the State of California and is authorized
to transact its business and is in good standing in each state in which its
ownership of assets or conduct of business requires such qualifications.
2.2 Subject to shareholder approval of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, STARFEST has the right, power, legal capacity
and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to perform its
obligations under this Agreement and the documents, instruments and certificates
to be executed and delivered by it pursuant to this Agreement. The execution and
delivery of and performance of the obligations contained in this Agreement by
STARFEST and all documents, instruments and certificates made or delivered by
STARFEST pursuant to this Agreement, and the transactions contemplated hereby,
have been or as of the Closing will be, duly authorized by all necessary action
on the part of STARFEST.
2.3 Subject to shareholder approval of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement and
all documents, instruments and certificates made or delivered from time to time
by STARFEST hereunder and thereunder shall constitute valid and legally binding
obligations of STARFEST, enforceable against STARFEST in accordance with the
terms hereof and thereof.
2.4 The execution of this Agreement by STARFEST does not require
any consent of, notice to or action by any person or governmental authority,
other than as provided in Exhibit 2.4 hereto. The performance of this Agreement
by STARFEST and the consummation by STARFEST of the transactions contemplated
hereby will not require any consent of, notice to or action by any person or
governmental authority, other than as provided in Exhibit 2.4 hereto.
2.5 The making and performance of this Agreement by STARFEST and
the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will not result in a
breach or violation by STARFEST of any of the terms or provisions of, or
constitute a default under, its Articles of Incorporation, its Bylaws, any
indenture, mortgage, deed of trust (constructive or other), loan agreement,
A-2
lease, franchise, license or other agreement or instrument to which STARFEST is
bound, any statute, or any judgment, decree, order, rule or regulation of any
court or governmental agency or body applicable to STARFEST or any of the
properties of STARFEST.
2.6 Attached hereto as Exhibit 2.6 are financial statements of
STARFEST for the annual periods ended December 31, 1998 and December 31, 1999
and as of December 31, 1998 and as of December 31, 1999, which have been audited
in accordance with GAAP. These financial statements present fairly the financial
condition and results of operations of its business, in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles as of the dates thereof and the periods
covered thereby.
A-2
2.7 As of the date hereof, the executive officers and directors
of STARFEST are Michael Huemmer and Janet Alexander.
2.8 STARFEST has authorized capital of 65 million shares of
Common Stock, no par value. Of these shares, 23 million are issued and
outstanding. Except as described in Exhibit 2.8 hereto, there are no existing
agreements, options, warrants, rights, calls or commitments of any kind
providing for the issuance of any shares, or for the repurchase or redemption of
shares, of STARFEST's capital stock, and there are no outstanding securities or
other instruments convertible into or exchangeable for shares of such capital
stock and no commitments to issue such securities or instruments. Each person
that has such a right shall surrender it to Starfest for no consideration other
than that of promoting the Closing of the transaction described in this
Agreement. All of the outstanding shares of STARFEST common stock have been duly
authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and nonassessable. None of the
outstanding shares of STARFEST common stock were issued in violation of the
Securities Act or any state securities laws.
2.9 Attached hereto as Exhibit 2.9 is a true and correct list of
all known material liabilities of STARFEST, contingent or matured, as of
December 31, 2000, which are not reflected on the balance sheet dated as of
December 31, 1999 and which arose in the ordinary course of business.
2.10 There is no claim for personal injury, products liability,
property or other damages, grievance, action, proceeding or governmental
investigation pending or, to STARFEST's knowledge, threatened against STARFEST
or affecting its assets or business, other than as listed on Exhibit 2.10
hereto.
2.11 STARFEST has filed, or will have filed prior to Closing, all
income, franchise, real property, personal property, sales, employment and other
tax returns required to be filed by any taxing authority and has paid or accrued
all taxes required to be paid by it in respect to the periods covered by such
returns, whether or not shown on such returns, and STARFEST has no liability for
such taxes in excess of the amounts so paid. A true and complete copy of all
federal income tax returns for the tax year ended December 31, 1998 as filed
with the Internal Revenue Service has been delivered to CONCIERGE, together with
A-3
all supporting schedules thereto. STARFEST is not delinquent in the payment of
any tax, assessment or governmental charge, has not requested any extension of
time within which to file any tax returns which have not since been filed, and
no deficiencies for any tax, assessment or governmental charge have been
claimed, proposed or assessed by any taxing authority. STARFEST's federal income
tax return has not been audited. As used herein, the term "tax" includes all
governmental taxes and related governmental charges imposed by the laws and
regulations of any governmental jurisdiction.
2.12 STARFEST's business, properties, plant and offices do not
exist or operate in violation of any federal, state or local code, law,
regulation or ordinance regulating zoning, city planning, fire safety,
environmental protection or similar matters. All permits, licenses, franchises,
consents and other authorizations necessary for the conduct of STARFEST's
business have been timely obtained and are currently in effect. STARFEST is not
in violation of any term or provision of any such permit, license, franchise,
consent or other authorization.
2.13 Except as described on Schedule 2.13, STARFEST is not a
party as of the date hereof to any written or oral (i) bonus, pension, insurance
or other plan providing employee benefits, (ii) contract, or series of related
contracts with any one vendor or customer, for purchase, sale or exchange made
in the ordinary course of business and in an amount in excess of $1,000, (iii)
contract not made in the ordinary course of business, (iv) franchise, licensing
or manufacturer's representative agreement, (v) contract with any A-3
shareholder of
STARFEST or an affiliate of any shareholder of STARFEST within the meaning of
the federal securities laws, or (vi) any contract for borrowed money either as
borrower or lender. All agreements listed on Schedule 2.13, to the extent that
the same give rights to STARFEST, are enforceable by STARFEST, and STARFEST has
not received notice of any claim to the contrary. Complete and correct copies of
all items listed in Schedule 2.13 have been delivered to CONCIERGE prior to the
execution of this Agreement.
Except as listed in Schedule 2.13, all parties other than
STARFEST obligated under the agreements listed on Schedule 2.13 are in
compliance in all material respects with the terms thereof and there has been no
notice of default or termination with respect to any such agreement that has not
been cured or waived in writing.
2.14 No employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of
Section 3(a) of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1994, as
amended ("ERISA"), has been maintained or sponsored by STARFEST or exists to
which STARFEST has contributed since its formation or is obligated to contribute
for the benefit of its employees. Neither STARFEST nor any corporation or other
entity affiliated with STARFEST contributes to, is obligated to contribute to,
or has during the last five years contributed to or been obligated to contribute
to, and none of STARFEST's employees are participants in, any multi-employer
plan within the meaning of Section 4001(a) of ERISA.
A-4
2.15 Since its formation, STARFEST has not infringed any patents,
trademarks, service marks or trade names registered to or used by it in its
business, nor has STARFEST claimed any such infringement.
2.16 The Company is not a party to or bound by any collective
bargaining agreement or any other agreement with a labor union.
2.17 All of the unrestricted outstanding shares were issued
pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Regulation D, Rule 504.
No legend or other reference to any purported lien or encumbrance appears upon
any certificate representing the unrestricted shares.
2.18 STARFEST has not made any material misstatement of fact or
omitted to state any material fact necessary or desirable to make complete,
accurate and not misleading every representation and warranty set forth herein.
3. Representations of CONCIERGE. CONCIERGE represents as follows:
----------------------------
3.1 CONCIERGE is a corporation duly organized, validly existing
and in good standing under the laws of the State of Nevada and is authorized to
transact its business and is in good standing in each state in which its
ownership of assets or conduct of business requires such qualifications.
CONCIERGE is engaged in the business of designing, developing, manufacturing and
marketing computer telephony technology devices.
3.2 The authorized capital stock of CONCIERGE consists of 10
million shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, of which 895,2761,490,744 shares are
issued and outstanding (the "CONCIERGE Shares. All of the CONCIERGE Shares have
been duly authorized and are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
Except for the obligations set forth on Exhibit 3.2 attached hereto, there are
no existing agreements, options,
A-4
warrants, rights, calls or commitments of any
kind to which CONCIERGE is a party or it is bound providing for the issuance of
any shares, or for the repurchase or redemption of shares, of CONCIERGE's
capital stock, and there are no outstanding securities or other instruments
convertible into or exchangeable for shares of such capital stock and no
commitments to issue such securities or instruments. None of the CONCIERGE
Shares were issued in violation of the Securities Act or any state securities
laws.
3.3 CONCIERGE has the right, power, legal capacity and authority
to execute and deliver this Agreement and to perform its obligations under this
Agreement, and the documents, instruments and certificates to be executed and
delivered by CONCIERGE pursuant to this Agreement. The execution and delivery of
and performance of the obligations contained in this Agreement by CONCIERGE and
all documents, instruments and certificates made or delivered by CONCIERGE
pursuant to this Agreement, and the transactions contemplated hereby, have been
or as of the Closing Date will be duly authorized by all necessary action on the
part of the CONCIERGE shareholders and CONCIERGE.
A-5
3.4 The terms and provisions of this Agreement and all documents,
instruments and certificates made or delivered from time to time by CONCIERGE
hereunder and thereunder constitute valid and legally binding obligations of
CONCIERGE, enforceable against CONCIERGE in accordance with the terms hereof and
thereof.
3.5 The execution and delivery of this Agreement by CONCIERGE do
not require any consent of, notice to or action by any person or governmental
authority, which consent, notice or action has not been made, given or otherwise
accomplished, and satisfactory evidence thereof has been delivered to Starfest.
The performance of this Agreement by CONCIERGE and the consummation by CONCIERGE
of the transactions contemplated hereby will not require any consent of, notice
to or action by any person or governmental authority.
3.6 The making and performance of this Agreement by CONCIERGE and
the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will not result in a
breach or violation by CONCIERGE of any of the terms or provisions of, or
constitute a default under, any indenture, mortgage, deed of trust (constructive
or other), loan agreement, lease, franchise, license or other agreement or
instrument to which CONCIERGE is bound, any statute, or any judgment, decree,
order, rule or regulation of any court or governmental agency or body applicable
to CONCIERGE or any of the properties of CONCIERGE.
3.7 Attached hereto as Exhibit 3.7 are unauditedaudited financial
statements of CONCIERGE from its inception through December 31, 1999.throughJune 30, 2000 and interim
financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2000. These financial
statements present fairly the financial condition and results of operations of
its business, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
except for those adjustments that would be required for audited financial
statements.
3.8 As of the date hereof, the executive officers and
directors of CONCIERGE are Allen E. Kahn, James E. Kirk, F. Patrick Flaherty,
Donald V. Fluken, Herbert Marcus III, Harry F. Camp, David W. Neibert and G. Robert Knauss.Samuel
C.H. Wu..
3.9 Attached as Exhibit 3.9 is a true and correct list of all
material liabilities of CONCIERGE, contingent or matured, which are not
reflected on the balance sheet dated as of December 31, 1999September 30, 2000 and which arose in
the ordinary course of business.
3.10 There is no claim for personal injury, products liability,
property or other damages,
A-5
grievance, action, proceeding or governmental
investigation pending, or to CONCIERGE's knowledge, threatened against CONCIERGE
or affecting its assets or business, other than as listed on Exhibit 3.10
hereto.
3.11 CONCIERGE has not made any material misstatement of fact or
omitted to state any material fact necessary or desirable to make complete,
accurate and not misleading every representation, warranty and agreement set
forth herein.
A-6
3.12 CONCIERGE has filed, or will have filed prior to Closing,
all income, franchise, real property, personal property, sales, employment and
other tax returns required to be filed by any taxing authority and has paid or
accrued all taxes required to be paid by it in respect to the periods covered by
such returns, whether or not shown on such returns, and CONCIERGE has no
liability for such taxes in excess of the amounts so paid. CONCIERGE is not
delinquent in the payment of any tax, assessment or governmental charge, has not
requested any extension of time within which to file any tax returns which have
not since been filed, and no deficiencies for any tax, assessment or
governmental charge have been claimed, proposed or assessed by any taxing
authority. As used herein, the term "tax" includes all governmental taxes and
related governmental charges imposed by the laws and regulations of any
governmental jurisdiction.
3.13 CONCIERGE's business, properties, plant and offices do not
exist or operate in violation of any federal, state or local code, law,
regulation or ordinance regulating zoning, city planning, fire safety,
environmental protection or similar matters. All permits, licenses, franchises,
consents and other authorizations necessary for the conduct of CONCIERGE's
business have been timely obtained and are currently in effect. CONCIERGE is not
in violation of any term or provision of any such permit, license, franchise,
consent or other authorization.
3.14 Except as described on Schedule 3.14, CONCIERGE is not a
party as of the date hereof to any written or oral (i) bonus, pension, insurance
or other plan providing employee benefits, (ii) contract, or series of related
contracts with any one vendor or customer, for purchase, sale or exchange made
in the ordinary course of business and in an amount in excess of $1,000, (iii)
contract not made in the ordinary course of business, (iv) franchise, licensing
or manufacturer's representative agreement, (v) contract with any shareholder of
CONCIERGE or an affiliate of any shareholder of CONCIERGE within the meaning of
the federal securities laws, or (vi) any contract for borrowed money either as
borrower or lender. All agreements listed on Schedule 3.14, to the extent that
the same give rights to CONCIERGE, are enforceable by CONCIERGE, and CONCIERGE
has not received notice of any claim to the contrary. Complete and correct
copies of all items listed in Schedule 3.14 have been delivered to Starfest
prior to the execution of this Agreement.
Except as listed in Schedule 3.14, all parties other than
CONCIERGE obligated under the agreements listed on Schedule 3.14 are in
compliance in all material respects with the terms thereof and there has been no
notice of default or termination with respect to any such agreement that has not
been cured or waived in writing.
3.15 No employee pension benefit plan within the meaning of
Section 3(a) of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1994, as
amended ("ERISA"), has been maintained or sponsored by CONCIERGE or exists to
which CONCIERGE has contributed since its formation or is obligated to
contribute for the benefit of its employees. Neither CONCIERGE nor any
corporation or other A-6
entity affiliated with CONCIERGE contributes to, is
obligated to contribute to, or has during the last five years contributed to or
A-7
been obligated to contribute to, and none of CONCIERGE's employees are
participants in, any multi-employer plan within the meaning of Section 4001(a)
of ERISA.
3.16 Since its formation, CONCIERGE has not infringed any
patents, trademarks, service marks or trade names registered to or used by it in
its business, nor has CONCIERGE claimed any such infringement.
3.17 CONCIERGE is not a party to or bound by any collective
bargaining agreement or any other agreement with a labor union.
4. ConfidentialityConfidentiality. From the Closing Date and for a period of five years
---------------
thereafter, each of the parties hereto covenants that it will not use for the
benefit of any of them or disclose to another any Confidential Information (as
hereafter defined) except as such disclosure or use may be consented to in
advance by the party which had supplied the information in a writing which
specifically refers to this covenant. Confidential Information as used herein
means information of commercial value to the supplying party and that is not
normally made public by the supplying party, including but not limited to the
whole or any part of any scientific or technical information, design, process,
procedure, formula, or improvement, trade secret, data, invention, discovery,
technique, marketing plan, strategy, forecast, customer or supplier lists,
business plan or financial information.
5. Conditions Precedent to STARFEST's Obligations.
----------------------------------------------
5.1 Conditions Precedent. The obligations of STARFEST to
consummate the transactions contemplated herein are subject to the satisfaction
(unless waived in writing), on or before the Closing Date, of the following
conditions:
(a) CONCIERGE shall have materially performed and
complied with all covenants, conditions and obligationobligations required by this
Agreement to be performed or complied with by CONCIERGE on or before the Closing
Date.
(b) All representations and warranties of CONCIERGE
contained in this Agreement, the Exhibits, and in any document, instrument or
certificate that shall be delivered by CONCIERGE under this Agreement shall be
materially true, correct and complete on and as though made on the Second
Closing Date.
(c) During the period from the date of this Agreement
through and including the Closing Date: (i) there shall not have occurred any
material adverse change affecting CONCIERGE; (ii) CONCIERGE shall not have
sustained any loss or damage that materially affects its ability to conduct
its business; (iii) the performance by CONCIERGE shall not have been rendered,
by a change incircumstancesin circumstances or actions by third parties (including, without
limitation, a change in any law or actions by a governmental authority),
A-8
impossible, illegal, commercially impracticable or capable of accomplishment
only on terms and conditions which require STARFEST to incur substantially
greater costs or burdens than STARFEST reasonably anticipated on the date of
this Agreement.
(d) As of the Closing Date, no action or proceeding
against any of the parties
A-7
hereto shall be before any court or governmental
agency seeking to restrain or prohibit or to obtain damages or other relief in
connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby and
which, in the judgment of Starfest, makes the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement inadvisable.
(e) CONCIERGE shall have tendered to STARFEST all
documents, certificates, payments and other items required by this Agreement
hereof to be delivered to STARFEST.
(f) A majority of the STARFEST Shareholders shall have
approved of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(g) CONCIERGE shall have received any consents necessary
to perform their obligations under this Agreement.
(h) STARFEST shall have received any and all permits,
authorizations, approvals and orders under federal and state securities laws for
the issuance of STARFEST's Common Stock, without the imposition of any
conditions adverse to STARFEST.
THE SALES OF THE SECURITIES WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF THIS AGREEMENT HAVE NOT
BEEN QUALIFIED WITH THE COMMISSIONERS OF CORPORATIONS OF THE STATES OF NEVADA OR
CALIFORNIA AND THE ISSUANCE OF SUCH SECURITIES OR THE PAYMENT OR RECEIPT OF ANY
PART OF THE CONSIDERATION THEREFORE PRIOR TO SUCH QUALIFICATION IS UNLAWFUL
UNLESS THE SALE OF SUCH SECURITIES IS EXEMPT FROM QUALIFICATION UNDER THE LAWS
OF THOSE STATES. THE RIGHTS OF ALL PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT ARE EXPRESSLY
CONDITIONED UPON SUCH QUALIFICATION BEING OBTAINED UNLESS THE SALE IS SO EXEMPT.
6. Conditions Precedent to CONCIERGE's Obligations.
-----------------------------------------------
The obligation of CONCIERGE to consummate the transactions
contemplated herein are subject to the satisfaction (unless waived in writing),
on or before the Closing Date, of the following conditions:
(a) STARFEST shall have materially performed and
complied with all covenants, conditions and obligations required by this
Agreement to be performed or complied with by STARFEST on or before the Closing
Date.
A-9
(b) All representations and warranties of STARFEST
contained in this Agreement, the Exhibits, and in any document, instrument or
certificate that shall be delivered by STARFEST under this Agreement shall be
materially true, correct and complete on and as though made on the Closing Date.
(c) During the period from the date of this Agreement
through and including the Closing Date: (i) there shall not have occurred any
material adverse change affecting STARFEST; (ii) STARFEST shall not have
sustained any loss or damage that materially affects its ability to conduct its
business; (iii) the performance by STARFEST shall not have been rendered, by a
change in circumstances or actions by third parties (including, without
limitation, a change in any law or actions by a governmental authority),
impossible, illegal, commercially impracticable or capable of accomplishment on
terms and A-8
conditions which require CONCIERGE to incur substantially greater
costs or burdens than CONCIERGE reasonably anticipated on the date of this
Agreement.
(d) As of the Closing Date, no action or proceeding
against any of the parties hereto shall be before any court or governmental
agency seeking to restrain or prohibit or to obtain damages or other relief in
connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby and
which, in the judgment of CONCIERGE, makes the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement inadvisable.
(e) STARFEST shall have tendered to CONCIERGE all
documents, certificates, and other items required by this Agreement hereof to be
delivered to CONCIERGE.
(f) STARFEST shall have received any consents necessary to
perform their obligations under this Agreement.
7. Closing.
-------
7.1 The closing of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement
(the "Closing") shall take place at such time and at such place as the parties
shall mutually agree but no later than AprilFebruary 15, 20002001 (the "Closing Date")
unless such date is extended by written agreement of STARFEST and CONCIERGE and
shall be effected in accordance with the following:
(a) CONCIERGE shall deliver to STARFEST, and STARFEST
shall deliver to CONCIERGE, good standing certificates from the secretary of
state of any state where the ownership of its assets or the conduct of its
business would require such qualification, attesting to the good standing of
CONCIERGE or, as the case may be, STARFEST, in each such state.
(b) There shall be delivered all other previously rendered
documents, instruments and other writings required to be delivered by CONCIERGE
to STARFEST or STARFEST to CONCIERGE, as the case may be, at or prior to
A-10
the Closing pursuant to this Agreement or otherwise legally required or
reasonably necessary in connection herewith.
(c) STARFEST shall deliver to CONCIERGE the certificate
of its corporate Secretary certifying that the necessary corporate action of
STARFEST's directors and stockholders has taken place to approve the merger
contemplated by this Agreement, and CONCIERGE shall deliver to STARFEST the
certificate of its corporate Secretary certifying that the necessary
corporate action of CONCIERGE's directors and stockholders has taken place to
approve the merger contemplated by this Agreement.
(d) STARFEST shall provide the documents needed to be
filed with the Secretaries of State of Nevada and California to effect the
merger, and the officers of each of STARFEST and CONCIERGE shall execute the
documents and deliver them to such Secretaries of State for filing.
(e) CONCIERGE shall deliver to STARFEST a list of its
stockholders, certified by its Secretary, setting forth the number of shares of
CONCIERGE common stock owned by each such stockholder and the number of shares
each such stockholder is to receive in the merger. STARFEST shall send the list
to its transfer agent and stock registrar with instructions to issue the
78
million96,957,713 shares to the
A-9
CONCIERGE stockholders in accordance with the list. The
certificates that will represent such 78 million96,957,713 shares of Common Stock of the
post-merger company will not bear a legend restricting the transferability of
the shares.
8. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated prior to the Closing by
delivery of notice in writing to that effect as follows:
8.1 By CONCIERGE, if any one or more of the conditions to the
obligations CONCIERGE to close has not been fulfilled as of the Closing Date;
8.2 By STARFEST, if any one or more of the conditions to its
obligations to close have not been fulfilled as of the Closing Date.
8.3 At any time on or prior to the Closing Date by mutual
written consent of the parties hereto.
If this Agreement so terminates, it shall become null and void and have no
further force or effect.
9. Survival and Indemnification.
9.1 The representations, warranties and covenants of the parties
made in this Agreement shall survive the Closing for a period of two years after
the Closing Date. Each party shall indemnify and hold harmless the other parties
from and against any loss, liability, damage, cost or expense (including
reasonable attorneys' and accountants' fees) which shall arise out of or is
connected with any breach of any representation or warranty made or covenant to
be performed by the party or parties against whom indemnification is sought;
A-11
provided, however, that no claims may be asserted against any party until and
unless the aggregate of all claims against such party exceeds $10,000 and the
maximum aggregate amount of the obligations of any individual party to provide
indemnification under this Agreement shall not exceed $200,000.
9.2 Upon the assertion by a third party against one of the
parties to this Agreement of a claim to which the indemnification provisions of
this Section apply, the party against whom the claim has been asserted shall
promptly notify the other party to this Agreement against whom a claim for
indemnification is expected to be made of such claim (and such notice shall be a
condition precedent to the liability of the parties or party so notified with
respect to such claim). Any party so notified shall have the right, at its own
expense and with counsel of its choice, to control the defense of any such claim
and all actions and proceedings in connection therewith, provided that any party
seeking indemnification shall have the right to participate in such defense with
counsel of its choice at its own expense. No such claim shall be compromised or
settled by any party to this Agreement without the prior written consent of the
other party. Each other party shall cooperate in every reasonable way with the
party assuming responsibility for the defense and disposition of such claim.
10. Post-Closing Covenants. CONCIERGE covenants that after the Closing:
----------------------
10.1 The post-merger company will exert all reasonable effort and
take all reasonable actions required to register its Common Stock with the SEC
on SEC Form 10-SB and to maintain its status as a company whose Common Stock is
quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board or shall change its status to a company whose
Common Stock is listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market.
A-10
10.2 The post-merger company shall not reverse split its stock
for a period of at least two years from the date hereof without the written
consent of Gary Bryant of Indian Wells, California..
10.3 For a period of one year, without the written consent of
Michael Huemmer the post-merger company will not issue or reserve for issuance
more than 9 million shares of its Common Stock for the purposes of attracting
qualified management and officers and of obtaining sufficient capital to
commence its business in a viable manner.
11. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of Nevada without application of Nevada's conflicts of
laws provision.
12. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement and any of the documents
described herein that are necessary for Closing may be executed in counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original and together which shall constitute
one and the same instrument.
13. Further Assurances. If, at any time before, on or after either
Closing Date, any further action by any of the parties to this Agreement is
necessary or desirable to carry out the purposes of this Agreement, such party
A-12
shall take all such necessary or desirable action or use such party's best
efforts to cause such action to be taken.
14. Expenses. CONCIERGE shall bear all expenses incurred by it in
connection with the negotiation, preparation or execution of this Agreement, and
STARFEST shall bear all expenses incurred by it in connection with the
negotiation, preparation or execution of this Agreement.
15. Judicial Proceedings. Each party hereto consents to the exclusive
jurisdiction over it of the courts of the State of Nevada in the County of
Hamilton and of the courts of the United States in the Southern District of
Nevada and agrees that personal service of all process may be made by registered
or certified mail pursuant to the provisions of Section 19. All actions arising
out of or relating in any way to any of the provisions of this Agreement or the
transactions contemplated hereby shall be brought or maintained only in one of
such courts. The parties hereby irrevocably waive any objection that they may
now have or hereafter acquire to the laying of venue of any such action or
proceeding brought in such courts and any claim that any action or proceeding
brought in any such court has been brought in an inconvenient forum. The parties
further agree that a final judgment in any such action or proceeding brought in
any such court, after all appeals or all rights of appeal have expired, shall be
conclusive and binding upon them and may be enforced in any competent court
located elsewhere.
16. Notices. Any notice or demand desired or required to be given
hereunder shall be in writing and deemed given when personally delivered, sent
by overnight courier or deposited in the mail (postage prepaid, certified or
registered, return receipt requested) and addressed as set forth below or to
such other address as any party shall have previously designated by such a
notice. Any notice delivered personally shall be deemed to be received on the
date of personal delivery; any notice sent by overnight courier shall be deemed
to be received upon confirmation one business day after the date sent; and any
notice mailed shall be deemed to be received on the date stamped on the receipt.
If to CONCIERGE Allen E. Kahn, Chief Executive Officer
Concierge, Inc.
7547 West Manchester Ave., No. 325
Los Angeles, CA 90045
A-11
Copy to: James E. Kirk, Esq.
11927 Menaul, N.E.
Albuquerque, NM 87112
If to STARFEST Michael Huemmer, President
Starfest, Inc.
9494 E. Redfield Road, #1136
Scottsdale,A-13
4602 East Palo Brea Lane
Cave Creek, AZ 8526085331
Copy to: Thomas J.Kenan
Fuller, Tubb, Pomeroy & Stokes
201 Robert S. Kerr Ave., Suite 1000
Oklahoma City, OK 73102
17. Parties in Interest. All of the terms and provisions of this
Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be enforceable
by the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto, whether herein
so expressed or not.
18. Severability. Any provision of this Agreement that is invalid or
unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to that jurisdiction, be ineffective
to the extent of such invalidity or unenforceability without rendering invalid
or unenforceable the remaining provisions of this Agreement or affecting the
validity or enforceability of any provision of this Agreement in any other
jurisdiction.
19. Amendment. Except as otherwise provided herein, the parties hereto
may modify or supplement this Agreement at any time, but only in writing duly
executed by each of the parties hereto.
20. Headings. The headings preceding the text of sections of this
Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be deemed a part hereof.
21. Entire Understanding. The terms set forth in this Agreement
including its Exhibits are intended by the parties as the final, complete and
exclusive expression of the terms of their agreement and may not be
contradicted, explained or supplemented by evidence of any prior agreement, any
contemporaneous oral agreement or any consistent additional terms. The Exhibits
attached to this Agreement are made a part of this Agreement.
22. Confidentiality. The parties hereto shall not make any public
announcement regarding the transactions contemplated by this Agreement without
the prior written consent of CONCIERGE and STARFEST, which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. The parties hereto will issue a
press release regarding the transactions contemplated by this Agreement upon the
execution of this Agreement. Each of the parties hereto shall keep strictly
confidential any and all information furnished to it or its agents or
representatives in the course of negotiations relating to this Agreement or any
A-12
transactions contemplated by this Agreement, and such parties have instructed
their representative officers, partners, employees and other representatives
having access to such information of such obligation of confidentiality. .
A-14
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into and signed this
Agreement as of the date and year first above written.
STARFEST, INC. CONCIERGE, INC.
By: /s//s/ Michael Huemmer By: /s//s/ Allen E. Kahn
--------------------- ----------------------------------------------------
Michael Huemmer, Allen E. Kahn, President
President
A-13A-15
UNTIL _____________________, 2000,2001 (90 DAYS AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE MERGER), ALL
DEALERS EFFECTING TRANSACTIONS IN THESE SECURITIES MAY BE REQUIRED TO DELIVER A
PROSPECTUS.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Separately bound but filed as part of this Registration Statement are
the following exhibits:
Exhibit Item
------- ----
2 - Agreement of mergerMerger of January 26, 2000, between
Starfest, Inc. and Concierge, Inc.*
2.1 - Stock Purchase Agreement of March 6, 2000 between
Starfest, Inc. and MAS Capital, Inc.*
2.2 - Amendment No. 1 to Agreement of Merger of January 26,
2000 between Starfest, Inc. and Concierge, Inc.+
2.3 - Amended Agreement of Merger of January 19, 2001
between Starfest, Inc. and Concierge, Inc.
3.1 - Articles of Incorporation and Amended Articles of
Incorporation of Starfest, Inc.*
3.2 - Bylaws of Starfest, Inc.*
3.3 - Articles of Incorporation of Concierge, Inc.**
3.4 - Bylaws of Concierge, Inc.**
5 - Opinion of Thomas J. Kenan, Esq., as to the legality
of the securities covered by the Registration
Statement.**
8 - Opinion of Thomas J. Kenan, Esq., as to tax matters
and tax consequences.**
10 - 1999 Stock Option Plan adopted by Starfest, Inc.*
10.1 - Manufacturing Services Agreement between Concierge,
Inc. and XeTel Corporation.+
10.2 - Service Level Agreement between Concierge, Inc. and
eAssist.com, Inc.***+ (superseded by Exhibit 10.5)
10.3 - Independent Consulting Agreement between Concierge,
Inc. and Dave Cook Consulting.***+ (superseded by
Exhibit 10.6).
10.4 - CD-ROM Storage and Fulfillment Agreement between
Concierge, Inc. and Point To Point LLC.
65
10.5 - Service Level Agreement between Concierge, Inc. and
eAssist.com, Inc.
10.6 - Independent Consulting Agreement between Concierge,
Inc. and Dave Cook Consulting.
23 - Consent of Thomas J. Kenan, Esq. to the reference to
him as an attorney who has passed upon certain
information contained in the Registration StatementStatement.**
23.1 - Consent of Brad B. Haynes, C.P.A., independent
auditor of Concierge, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit
23.12).
23.2 - Consent of Jaak (Jack) Olesk, C.P.A., independent
auditor of Starfest, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit
23.13).
23.3 - Consent of Harry F. Camp to serve as a director should
the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.
23.4 - Consent of John Conners to serve as a director
should the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc.
become effective. (To be filed by amendment.)**
23.5 - Consent of F. Patrick Flaherty to serve as a director
should the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.**
23.6 - Consent of Donald W. Fluken to serve as a director
should the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.
32
**
23.7 - Consent of Allen E. Kahn to serve as a director should
the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.**
23.8 - Consent of James E. Kirk to serve as a director should
the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.**
23.9 - Consent of Herbert Marcus, III to serve as a director
should the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.**
23.10 - Consent of David W. Neibert to serve as a director
should the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.**
23.11 - Consent of Samuel C.H. Wu to serve as a director
should the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.**
23.13 - Consent of Jaak (Jack) Olesk, C.P.A., independent
auditor of Starfest, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit
23.14).
23.14 - Consent of Jaak (Jack) Olesk, C.P.A., independent
auditor of Starfest, Inc.++
23.15 - Consent of Hamid Kabani, C.P.A., independent auditor
of Concierge, Inc.++
23.16 - Consent of Hamid Kabani, C.P.A., independent auditor
of Concierge, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit 23.18).
66
23.17 - Consent of Jaak (Jack) Olesk, C.P.A., independent
auditor of Starfest, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit
23.19).
23.18 - Consent of Hamid Kabani, C.P.A., independent auditor
of Concierge, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit 23.21).
23.19 - Consent of Jaak (Jack) Olesk, C.P.A., independent
auditor of Starfest, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit
23.22).
23.20 - Consent of Hamid Kabani, C.P.A., independent auditor
of Starfest, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit 23.23).
23.21 - Consent of Hamid Kabani, C.P.A., independent auditor
of Concierge, Inc.
23.22 - Consent of Jaak (Jack) Olesk, C.P.A., independent
auditor of Starfest, Inc.
23.23 - Consent of Hamid Kabani, C.P.A., independent auditor
of Starfest, Inc.
27 - Financial Data Schedule.**
27.1 - Financial Data Schedule+
27.2 - Financial Data Schedule++
* Previously filed with Form 8-K12G3 on March 10, 2000; Commission File
No. 000- 29913,000-29913, incorporated herein.
** Previously filed with Form S-4 on June 8, 2000; Commission File No.
333-38838, incorporated herein.
*** Confidential treatment for portions of this exhibit have been
requested.
+ Previously filed with Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 on September 5,
2000; Commission File No. 333-38838, incorporated herein.
++ Previously filed with Amendment No. 2 to Form S-4 on December 8,
2000; Commission File No. 333-38838, incorporated herein.
+++ Previously filed with Amendment No. 3 to Form S-4 on January 31,
2001, Commission File No. 333-38838, incorporated herein.
67
UNDERTAKINGS
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933 ("the Act") may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling
persons of Starfest, Inc. pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise,
Starfest, Inc. has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and
Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed
in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for
indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by Starfest,
Inc. of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person
of Starfest, Inc. in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding)
is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with
the securities being registered, Starfest, Inc. will, unless in the opinion of
its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a
court of jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against
public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the
final adjudication of such issue.
3368
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Registrant
has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Scottsdale,Cave Creek, Arizona.
Date: May 17, 2000August 24, 2001 Starfest, Inc.
By/s/Michael Huemmer
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Huemmer, president
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
Date: May 17, 2000August 24, 2001 /s/Michael Huemmer
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Huemmer, president,
director, principal financial
officer, and authorized
representative of the Registrant
Date: May 18, 2000August 27, 2001 /s/Janet Alexander
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Janet Alexander, secretary and
director of the Registrant
3469
Starfest, Inc.
Commission File No. 000-29913333-38838
Amendment No. 5 to Form S-4
List of Exhibits
----------------
Exhibit Item
------- ----
2 - Agreement of mergerMerger of January 26, 2000, between
Starfest, Inc. and Concierge, Inc.*
2.1 - Stock Purchase Agreement of March 6, 2000 between
Starfest, Inc. and MAS Capital, Inc.*
2.2 - Amendment No. 1 to Agreement of Merger of January 26,
2000 between Starfest, Inc. and Concierge, Inc.+
2.3 - Amended Agreement of Merger of January 19, 2001
between Starfest, Inc. and Concierge, Inc.+++
3.1 - Articles of Incorporation and Amended Articles of
Incorporation of Starfest, Inc.*
3.2 - Bylaws of Starfest, Inc.*
3.3 - Articles of Incorporation of Concierge, Inc.**
3.4 - Bylaws of Concierge, Inc.**
5 - Opinion of Thomas J. Kenan, Esq., as to the legality
of the securities covered by the Registration
Statement.**
8 - Opinion of Thomas J. Kenan, Esq., as to tax matters
and tax consequences.**
10 - 1999 Stock Option Plan adopted by Starfest, Inc.*
10.1 - Manufacturing Services Agreement between Concierge,
Inc. and XeTel Corporation.+
10.2 - Service Level Agreement between Concierge, Inc. and
eAssist.com, Inc.***+ (superseded by Exhibit 10.5)
1
10.3 - Independent Consulting Agreement between Concierge,
Inc. and Dave Cook Consulting.***+ (superseded by
Exhibit 10.6).
10.4 - CD-ROM Storage and Fulfillment Agreement between
Concierge, Inc. and Point To Point LLC.
10.5 - Service Level Agreement between Concierge, Inc. and
eAssist.com, Inc.
10.6 - Independent Consulting Agreement between Concierge,
Inc. and Dave Cook Consulting.
23 - Consent of Thomas J. Kenan, Esq. to the reference to
him as an attorney who has passed upon certain
information contained in the Registration Statement.**
23.1 - Consent of Brad B. Haynes, C.P.A., independent
auditor of Concierge, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit
23.12).
23.2 - Consent of Jaak (Jack) Olesk, C.P.A., independent
auditor of Starfest, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit
23.13).
23.3 - Consent of Harry F. Camp to serve as a director should
the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.
23.4 - Consent of John Conners to serve as a director should the
proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become effective. (To
be filed by amendement.)**
23.5 - Consent of F. Patrick Flaherty to serve as a director
should the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.**
23.6 - Consent of Donald W. Fluken to serve as a director
should the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.**
23.7 - Consent of Allen E. Kahn to serve as a director should
the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.**
23.8 - Consent of James E. Kirk to serve as a director should
the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.**
23.9 - Consent of Herbert Marcus, III to serve as a director
should the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.**
23.10 - Consent of David W. Neibert to serve as a director
should the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.**
23.11 - Consent of Samuel C.H. Wu to serve as a director
should the proposed merger with Concierge, Inc. become
effective.**
23.13 - Consent of Jaak (Jack) Olesk, C.P.A., independent
2
auditor of Starfest, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit
23.14).
23.14 - Consent of Jaak (Jack) Olesk, C.P.A., independent
auditor of Starfest, Inc.++
23.15 - Consent of Hamid Kabani, C.P.A., independent auditor
of Concierge, Inc.++
23.16 - Consent of Hamid Kabani, C.P.A., independent auditor
of Concierge, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit 23.18).
23.17 - Consent of Jaak (Jack) Olesk, C.P.A., independent
auditor of Starfest, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit
23.19).
23.18 - Consent of Hamid Kabani, C.P.A., independent auditor
of Concierge, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit 23.21).
23.19 - Consent of Jaak (Jack) Olesk, C.P.A., independent
auditor of Starfest, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit
23.22).
23.20 - Consent of Hamid Kabani, C.P.A., independent auditor
of Starfest, Inc. (superseded by Exhibit 23.23).
23.21 - Consent of Hamid Kabani, C.P.A., independent auditor
of Concierge, Inc.
23.22 - Consent of Jaak (Jack) Olesk, C.P.A., independent
auditor of Starfest, Inc.
23.23 - Consent of Hamid Kabani, C.P.A., independent auditor
of Starfest, Inc.
27 - Financial Data Schedule.**
27.1 - Financial Data Schedule+
27.2 - Financial Data Schedule++
* Previously filed with Form 8-K12G3 on March 10, 2000; Commission File
No. 000-29913, incorporated herein.
** Previously filed with Form S-4 on June 8, 2000; Commission File No.
333-38838, incorporated herein.
*** Confidential treatment for portions of this exhibit have been
requested.
+ Previously filed with Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 on September 5,
2000; Commission File No. 333-38838, incorporated herein.
3
++ Previously filed with Amendment No. 2 to Form S-4 on December 8,
2000; Commission File No. 333-38838, incorporated herein.
+++ Previously filed with Amendment No. 3 to Form S-4 on January 31,
2001, Commission File No. 333-38838, incorporated herein.
4
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement
For
Concierge
March 29, 2000
This document contains proprietary and confidential information. Neither this
document nor said proprietary information shall be published, reproduced,
copied, disclosed, or used for any purpose without prior written approval from
eAssist.com: 5005 Wateridge Vista Drive, San Diego, California, 92121.
www.eAssist.com
- ---------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 1 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 1 of 17 Pages
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement (SLA)
Under this Agreement, dated 3/31/00, eAssist.com, Inc. ("eAssist",
"eAssist.com") and Concierge ("Concierge") agree to the following:
1. Services
--------
Concierge wishes to contract eAssist.com to provide multimedia customer
relationship management (eCRM) services via the Internet to Concierge.
eAssist.com will provide outsourced e-mail management services and
software, chat management services and software, and voice based call
handling. eAssist.com will be responsible for the management of all
technical infrastructure, bandwidth, hardware, software and agents.
2. Term
----
The term of this Agreement shall be two years commencing on 3.29.00.
Thereafter, the agreement will automatically renew for successive
one-year periods unless Concierge notifies eAssist.com sixty (60)
days prior to the Agreement and date of its intention to cancel the
Agreement. eAssist.com may terminate this agreement for any reason on
sixty (60) days written notice. In the event of any form of
termination Concierge agrees to pay eAssist.com all costs identified in
this Agreement up to and including the date of termination.
3. Payment of Invoices
---------------------
Setup fees are payable on agreement signature.
All invoices are payable net thirty (30).
If invoices are not paid within thirty (30) days of the invoice due date,
eAssist.com will send a collection notice to Concierge requesting
payment. If the payment is not received within fifteen (15) days of the
date posted on the collection notice, eAssist.com may at its sole
discretion disable the service. The service will only be re-enabled on
full payment of all outstanding invoices.
4. Implementation
The work to be performed in order to implement an eAssist solution for
Concierge site is described in Appendix A.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 2 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 2 of 17 Pages
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement (SLA)
5. Service Level by Type
------------------------
The following schedule provides the (OUTSOURCED) service levels by
Service type as measured monthly.
- All services will be available 24 hours per day 7 days per week
- 90% of automatic e-mail response within 10 minutes
- 90% of personalized e-mail response within 8 hours
- 80% of chat requests commenced within 120 seconds
- 80% of calls (VolP) answered within 120 seconds
- Net of pre-authorized maintenance windows, hardware/software uptime of
95%
6. Compensation
------------
6.1. Outsourced Pricing Schedule
The following pricing schedule outlines all set-up, management, and
transactional fees. Fees include the setup, design, end management of the
outsourced solutions for the following channels: self help, e-mail, chat,
VolP, Phone and eCRM. Please see the cost descriptions following the
schedule for details.
SERVICE DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE
Installation and Setup Services
Setup Fees Implementation of an outsourced $5,000 Up Front and
enterprise chat, e-mail, VolP and $1,000 per month for
eCRM solution, including initial the next 6 months.
training development.
Monthly Services
Management Fee Knowledge Base Management System $3,000 per month
Maintenance and Administration
Reporting (number of licenses TBD).
Channel Services
E-mail - Automated System infrastructure and $0.25 per automated
maintenance related to transaction
automated e-mail.
E-mail - Personalized System infrastructure and $2.95 per personalized
maintenance related to transaction
personalized e-mail.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 3 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 3 of 17
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement (SLA)
Chat System infrastructure and $0.85 per connect
maintenance related to chat minute
connect.
Collaboration System infrastructure and $0.85 per connect
maintenance related to minute
collaboration.
VolP System infrastructure and $0.85 per connect
maintenance related to VolP. minute
Live-Person Telephone System infrastructure and $0.85 per connect
Support maintenance related to Excludes long distance
Overflow voice call handling. and toll charges
Overflow Voice Call System infrastructure and $32.00 per staff
Handling maintenance related to overflow hour
Voice call handling. Excludes long distance
and toll charges
Additional Services and Incidentals
Training Train the ESR on using the $250.00 per ESR per
technology as well as on day
Concierge's products and
services.
Disbursements Pre-approved costs related Variable
to account - see below.
6.2. Pricing Detail
6.2.1. One Time Installation and Set Up Services
eAssist.com will provide consulting services that include:
Facilities - eAssist.com Facility
- Customization of secure data facilities
- Hardware customization and configuration
- Desktop configuration for required staffing levels
Implementation Planning
Discovery meeting
- Domain strategy design and development
- Technical architecture design and development
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 4 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 4 of 17 Pages
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement (SLA)
- Operational process definition and design
Blueprint development
- Single specific design document which outlines all
components of the domain, strategic, and technical
agreement
- Becomes an addendum to the contract once signed and
forms the basis for all future design changes
- Ensures consistency through documented communication
without raising unnecessary hurdles or barriers
Operational development
- On-site operational development session with
eAssist.com specialists to design and develop
operational processes and procedures for the
integrated management of the customer contact center
- Dedicated off-site support for development of
integrated management of the customer contact center
- We will provide domain expertise with regard to the
recruiting, prescreening, interviewing and hiring of
ESRs - our proven methodologies will minimize the
recruitment cycle, maximize employee satisfaction,
and reduce employee turnover
- We will provide domain expertise with regard to
training methodologies which work best within the ESRs
environment - our methodologies will maximize
productivity, reduce the training cycle, and
minimize the learning curve
Technical Implementation
- Team of technical architects dedicated to the
conceptual design and development of required
technical infrastructure
- Technical consulting work with Concierge's technical
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 5 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 5 of 17 Pages
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement (SLA)
teams both on and off site
- Design, setup, implementation and integration of
customized software applications for: one-to-one chat
interaction, processes for integrating web pages
directly with our chat server and continual knowledge
base expert system
- Design, setup, implementation and integration of
customized software applications for: automated and
personalized e-mail
- Design, setup, implementation and integration of
customized software applications for: VolP
- Design, setup, implementation and integration of
customized software applications for: eCRM
Knowledge Base Development
- Knowledge base "use" training
- Knowledge base train-the-trainer training
- Knowledge base deployment and structure design -
professional and consumer portals
Reporting Design and Definition
- Standardized reporting tools query definition
- Customized report design per Concierge requirements
- Tracking database setup and design
Terms
- Additional consulting requirements or changes to the
initial design specifications may incur additional
setup costs. Additional costs are subject to Concierge
approval.
6.2.2. Monthly Management Services
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 6 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 6 of 17 Pages
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement (SLA)
eAssist.com charges a flat-rate monthly management fee that
includes domain expertise, system maintenance, account
management and administrative functions. eAssist.com will
assign a dedicated team of specialists to oversee the
on-going management of this program and manage a team of
specialists to handle client interactions.
Domain Expertise
Knowledge Base Management
- Automated e-mail response and content required for
Chat Content Push, Web IVR, VolP, and Personalized
E-mail response necessitates the development and
deployment of a knowledge base.
- Deploy the necessary technology to accommodate this
requirement.
- Dedicate expert users to develop this knowledge base.
These specialists will work with Concierge and
eAssist.com to maximize the rate of development of the
knowledge base.
- The objective of the specialists will be to maximize
the percentage of customer contacts handled by the
auto-response engine and to maximize the productivity
of the chat sessions through push content availability
and development.
Relationship Management
- Single point of relationship responsibility within
eAssist.com, experienced customer contact management
knowledge, coordination of all eAssist.com operational
functions including - technical, finance and
consulting - with Concierge operations management.
Data Reporting/Mining Analysis
- eAssist.com's mission provides for value - added
services to be an integral component of our service
offering.
- Our systems will be designed with data mining
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 7 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 7 of 17 Pages
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement (SLA)
capabilities as well as advanced reporting functions.
- In addition, our system will be flexible enough to
handle ad hoc reporting requirements that will allow
tailored reporting to meet outside-of-the-box
requirements.
- eAssist.com has anticipated providing the following
three value added services, more will be added when
the discovery meeting is complete:
- Staffing recommendations based on patterned historical
information analysis
- Retention recommendations
- Stimulation recommendations
Administrative Functions
- Reporting functions, facilities management and
development of the knowledge base, data mining to
drive knowledge base development, train-the-trainer
sessions, bandwidth analysis, and ongoing consulting
for maintenance and modifications to the systems.
System Maintenance
- On-going development of the Concierge's system,
security management, firewall management, dedicated
system engineers, server & server farm maintenance
and management, on-site and off-site development work
(plus disbursements).
6.2.3. Channel Services
Self-Help
- The processing and handling of inbound self-help
requests designed to provide companies with fast,
accurate and personalized responses to customer
questions.
- Our extensible eCRM system, which works in conjunction
with the self-help processing, allows for the capture
of additional customer information to gain valuable
insight for enhanced customer retention.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 8 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 8 of 17 Pages
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement (SLA)
Email
- The processing and handling of inbound email requests
designed to provide companies with fast, accurate and
personalized responses to customer questions.
- We build in automation and artificial intelligence
components to accommodate large volumes of web- and
e-mail-based inquiries.
- Our extensible eCRM system, which works in conjunction
with the e-mail processing, allows for the capture of
additional customer information to gain valuable
insight for enhanced customer retention.
Chat
- The processing and handling of inbound chat
requests designed to provide companies with fast,
accurate and personalized responses to customer
questions.
- We build in automation and routing components to
accommodate large volumes of web chat inquiries.
- Our extensible eCRM system, which works in conjunction
with the chat system, allows for the capture of
additional customer information to gain valuable
insight for enhanced customer retention.
Collaboration
- The processing and handling of inbound collaboration
requests designed to provide companies with fast,
accurate and personalized responses to customer
questions.
- We build in automation and routing components to
accommodate large volumes of collaboration inquiries.
- Our extensible eCRM system, which works in conjunction
with the chat system, allows for the capture of
additional customer information to gain valuable
insight for enhanced customer retention.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 9 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 9 of 17 Pages
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement (SLA)
VolP
- The processing and handling of inbound VolP requests
designed to provide companies with fast, accurate and
personalized responses to customer questions.
- We build in automation and routing components to
accommodate large volumes of VolP inquiries.
- Our extensible eCRM system, which works in conjunction
with the VolP, allows for the capture of additional
customer information to gain valuable insight for
enhanced customer retention.
Live-Person Telephone Support
- The processing and handling of inbound telephone
requests designed to provide companies with fast,
accurate and personalized responses to customer
questions.
Overflow Voice Call Handling
- The processing and handling of overflow telephone
requests designed to provide companies with fast,
accurate and personalized responses to customer
questions.
- eAssist.com provides dedicated staffing based on
pre-approved staffing schedules.
6.2.4. Monthly Software Usage Fees
For the hosted solution only. There is a monthly service
fee associated with the license to use the eCRM, email,
chat, and/or VolP software. This license fee is allocated
per enabled workstation. The enabling software is
proprietary and/or licensed software of eAssist.com.
6.2.5. Additional Services and Incidentals
Training
- We design and build a training program for the web
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 10 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 10 of 17 Pages
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement (SLA)
agents to understand and be efficient with the
technologies as well as with the content of the client
with which we are working.
- The training also includes training of supervisors and
managers of the system.
- Bandwidth requirements included out to the Internet,
not included between eAssist.com facility and
Concierge facility.
Disbursements
- Concierge upon mutual agreement and approval, will
reimburse eAssist.com for all disbursements associated
with the account including airfare, ground
transportation, hotel accommodations reasonable
travel-related expenses and any other reasonable
expense that results from the management of the
account.
7. Warranties, Disclaimers and Miscellaneous
--------------------------------------------
7.1. Limited Service Warranty
eAssist.com warrants that it will use its commercially reasonable efforts
to minimize downtime, and that upon notification of excessive downtime,
eAssist.com will provide only the following remedies to Concierge.
7.2. Year 2000
This statement is provided as a "Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure" as
defined in the Year 2000 Information and Readiness Disclosure Act of 1998
(Public Law 105-271, 112 Stat. 2386), enacted on October 19, 1998.
As the Company is a recent start-up venture, we have not had to evaluate
existing Company equipment and processes for possible turn of the
century problems. Instead, we have evaluated the Year 2000 compliance
of each new purchase, lease, license or other "acquisition" of computer
hardware and software, business processes and pertinent non-computer
equipment and embedded processors and controllers at the time of
acquisition. The Company recognizes the importance of business continuity
into the new century and believes its Year 2000 program is designed to
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 11 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 11 of 17 Pages
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement (SLA)
achieve Year 2000 readiness at the Company.
It is still too early to measure our success, however, and we are
Dependent to a significant extent on the Year 2000 fixes and assurances
of our vendors. In addition, unresolved Year 2000 problems of our
providers and customers could affect us. Nevertheless, while there are
uncertainties and unknowns inherent in the Year 2000 problem and we
cannot be responsible for Year 2000 failures outside of our control,
we feel confident that the steps we are taking are reasonable and
appropriate.
7.3. No Other Warranty
Services are provided on an "AS IS" basis, and Concierge's use of the
eAssist.com service is at its own risk. eAssist.com does not make, and
hereby disclaims, any and all other express or implied warranties,
including, but not limited to, warranties of merchantability,
fitness for particular purpose, non-infringement and title, and any
warranties arising from a course of dealing, usage, or trade practice.
EAssist.com does not warrant that the service will be uninterrupted,
error-free or completely secure.
7.4. Indemnification
Concierge agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless eAssist.com from
and against any and all suits and any costs and expenses, including legal
fees, which may be imposed on or suffered by Concierge as a result of
eAssist.com's representation of Concierge or as a result of errors,
misstatements or omissions in any information furnished to eAssist.com by
Concierge, Concierge employees or agents regarding Concierge and
Concierge business activities.
7.5. Maximum Liability
eAssist.com's maximum aggregate liability to Concierge related to or in
connection with this Agreement will be limited to the total amount paid
by Concierge to eAssist.com hereunder for the 3-month period prior to the
event or events giving rise to such liability.
7.6. Reliance on Disclaimers, Liability Limitations and Indemnification
Obligations
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 12 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 12 of 17 Pages
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement (SLA)
Concierge acknowledges that eAssist.com has set its prices and entered
into this Agreement in reliance upon the limitations and exclusions of
liability, the disclaimers of warranties and damages and Concierge's
indemnity obligations set forth herein, and that the same form an
essential basis of the bargain between the parties. The parties agree
that the limitations and exclusions of liability and disclaimers
specified in this Agreement will survive and apply even if the Agreement
is found to have failed of their essential purpose.
7.7. Force Majeure
eAssist.com will not be liable for any failure under this Agreement, or
for credits, or reduction in charges due to any cause beyond its
reasonable control, including acts of war, acts of God, earthquake,
flood, embargo, riot, sabotage, labor shortage or dispute, governmental
act or failure of the Internet.
7.8. Marketing
Concierge agrees that eAssist.com may refer to Concierge by trade name
And trademark, and may briefly describe Concierge's business, in
eAssist.com marketing materials and web site.
7.9. Confidentiality
Definition of "Confidential Information" For the purposes of this
Agreement, "Confidential Information" means any information disclosed by
either party to the other party, either directly or indirectly, in
writing, orally or by inspection of tangible objects or by the viewing of
product demonstrations (including without limitation documents,
prototypes and equipment), which is designated or described by the
disclosing party as "Confidential," "Proprietary" or some similar
designation. Information communicated orally shall be considered
Confidential Information if such information is designated at the
time of disclosure as confidential. Confidential information may also
include information disclosed to a disclosing party by third parties.
Confidential information shall not include any information which (i)
is publicly known and is generally available in the public domain through
no action or inaction of the receiving party; (ii) was already in the
possession of the receiving party at the time of disclosure by the
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 13 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 13 of 17 Pages
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement (SLA)
disclosing party as shown by the receiving party's files and records
immediately prior to the time of disclosure; (iii) is obtained by the
receiving party from an independent third party without a breach of such
third party's obligations of confidentiality; or (iv) is independently
developed by the receiving party without use of or reference to materials
provided by the disclosing party.
Non-use and Nondisclosure Each party agrees that it will not use any
Confidential Information of the other party for any purpose except for
The Authorized Purpose. Each party agrees that it will not disclose
any of the other party's Confidential Information to (i) any third
parties or (ii) such party's own employees, except for those employees
who are required to have the information in connection with the
Authorized Purpose. Neither party shall reverse engineer, disassemble
or decompile any prototypes, software or other tangible objects which
embody the other party's Confidential Information and which are provided
to the party hereunder.
Maintenance of Confidentiality Each party agrees that it shall take
reasonable measures to protect the secrecy of and avoid the disclosure
and the unauthorized use of the other party's Confidential
Information. Without limiting the foregoing, each party shall take at
least those measures that it takes to protect its own most highly
confidential information and shall ensure that each of its employees
who have access to the other party's Confidential Information has signed
a non-use and nondisclosure Agreement in content similar to the
provisions hereof, prior to any disclosure of Confidential Information to
such employees. Neither party shall make any copies of the other
party's Confidential Information without the disclosing party's prior
written consent. Each party shall reproduce the other party's
proprietary rights notices on any such approved copies, in the same
manner in which such notices were set forth in or on the original. In the
event that a receiving party is required by law to disclose Confidential
Information obtained from the disclosing party, the receiving party
shall give the disclosing party prompt written notice of such requirement
as soon as possible prior to such disclosure and shall provide the
disclosing party with assistance in obtaining an order protecting
the information from disclosure.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 14 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 14 of 17 Pages
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement (SLA)
7.10. Notices
All notices shall be sent to the following addresses:
If to eAssist.com:
eAssist.com
c/o Ben Pak, Comptroller
5005 Wateridge Vista Drive, Suite 100
San Diego, CA
92171
USA
If to Concierge:
Allen E. Kahn
531 Main Street #963
El Segundo, CA 90245
7.11. Miscellaneous
This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto
and their successors and assigns. This Agreement shall be governed by the
laws of the State of California, without reference to conflict of law
principles. Each party agrees that any violation or threatened violation
of this Agreement may cause irreparable injury to the other party,
entitling the other party to seek injunctive relief in addition to all
legal remedies. Each party agrees to submit any and all disputes
regarding this Agreement, if not resolved between the parties, to binding
arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Rules of the American
Arbitration Association. The decision and any award resulting from such
arbitration shall be binding and final. This document contains the
entire Agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter
hereof, and neither party shall have any obligation, express or implied
by law, with respect to trade secret or proprietary information of the
other party except as set forth herein. Any failure to enforce any
provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver thereof or of
any other provision. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any
obligation waived, except by a writing signed by both parties hereto.
8. Signatures
----------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 15 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 15 of 17 Pages
eassist.com
Service Level Agreement (SLA)
Agreed to on March 31, 2000, at Los Angeles, CA.
By:
eAssist.com Concierge
/s/[signature illegible] /s/Allen E. Kahn
- --------------------------------- -------------------------------
Name Name
Controller President
- --------------------------------- -------------------------------
Title Title
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Concierge SLA Confidential Page 16 3/29/00
Exhibit 10.5
Page 16 of 17 Pages
INDEPENDENT CONSULTING AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made as of March 17, 2000 between Concierge, Inc. ("Client")
and Dave Cook Consulting ("Consultant").
1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply for purposes of this
Agreement:
a) "Work Product" means all programs, systems, data and materials, in
whatever form, first produced or created by or for Consultant as a result of, or
related to, performance of work or services under this Agreement.
b) "Background Technology" means all programs, systems, data and
materials, in whatever form, that do not constitute Work Product and are: (1)
included in, or necessary to, the Work Product; and (2) owned either solely by
Consultant or licensed to Consultant with a right to sublicense.
2. Services Performed by Consultant: Consultant agrees to perform the
following services for Client:
a) Provide consulting services to Client and Client's sub-contractors.
b) Provide product development services to Client.
3. Consultant's Payment: Consultant shall be compensated per the following
schedule:
a) A cash rate of $75 per hour. Payment of this may be deferred until
Client's revenue permits, or no more than 60 days.
b) And, Consultant will receive post-merger stock shares equivalent to
$50 per hour based on the closing price of Starfest (SFST) at the end of the
trading day on March 17, 2000.
4. Expenses:
Client shall reimburse Consultant for all reasonable travel and living expenses
necessarily incurred by Consultant while away from Consultant's regular place of
business and engaged in the performance of services under this Agreement.
Consultant agrees to maintain appropriate records and to submit copies of all
receipts necessary to verify such expenses at the time and in the manner
prescribed by Client.
5. Invoices: Consultant shall submit invoices for all services rendered.
Client shall pay the amounts agreed to herein upon receipt of such invoices.
/s/AEK /s/DEC
Client Initials Consultant Initials
Exhibit 10.6
Page 1 of 8 Pages
6. Consultant an Independent Contractor: Consultant is an independent
contractor, and neither Consultant nor Consultant's staff is, or shall be
deemed, Client's employees. In its capacity as an independent contractor,
Consultant agrees and represents, and Client agrees, as follows:
a) Consultant has the right to perform services for others during the
term of this Agreement subject to noncompetition provisions set out in this
Agreement, if any.
b) Consultant has the sole right to control and direct the means,
manner and method by which the services required by this Agreement will be
performed.
c) Consultant has the right to perform the services required by this
Agreement at any place or location and such times as Consultant may determine.
d) Consultant will furnish all equipment and materials used to provide
the services required by this Agreement, except to the extent that Consultant's
work must be performed on or with Client's computer or existing software.
e) The services required by this Agreement shall be performed by
Consultant, or Consultant's staff, and Client shall not be required to hire,
supervise, or pay any assistants to help Consultant.
f) Consultant is responsible for paying all ordinary and necessary
expenses of its staff.
g) Neither Consultant nor Consultant's staff shall receive any training
from Client in the professional skills necessary to perform the services
required by this Agreement.
h) Neither Consultant nor Consultant's staff shall be required to
devote full-time to the performance of the services required by this Agreement.
i) Client shall not provide any insurance coverage of any kind for
Consultant or Consultant's staff.
j) Client shall not withhold from Consultant's compensation any amount
that would normally be withheld from an employee's pay.
7. Ownership of Consultant's Work Product:
/s/AEK /s/DEC
Client Initials Consultant Initials
Exhibit 10.6
Page 2 of 8 Pages
Subject to full payment of the consulting fees due hereunder, Consultant hereby
assigns to Client its entire right, title and interest in the Work Product
including all patents, copyrights, trade secrets and other proprietary rights in
or based on the Work Product.
Consultant shall execute and aid in the preparation of any papers that Client
may consider necessary or helpful to obtain or maintain any patents, copyrights,
trademarks or other proprietary rights at no charge to Client, but at Client's
expense. Client shall reimburse Consultant for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.
8. Ownership of Background Technology:
Client agrees that Consultant shall retain any and all rights Consultant may
have in the Background Technology. Subject to full payment of the consulting
fees due hereunder, Consultant hereby grants Client an unrestricted,
nonexclusive, perpetual, fully paid-up worldwide license to use and sublicense
the use of the Background Technology for the purpose of developing and marketing
its products, but not for the purpose of marketing Background Technology
separate from its products.
9. Confidential Information:
a) Consultant agrees that the Work Product is Client's sole and
exclusive property. Consultant shall treat the Work Product on a confidential
basis and not disclose it to any third party without Client's written consent,
except when reasonably necessary to perform the services under this Agreement.
Consultant shall be relieved of this confidentiality obligation if and when
Client discloses the Work Product without any restriction upon further
disclosure.
b) During the term of this Agreement and for 1 year afterwards,
Consultant will not use or disclose to others without Client's written consent
Client's confidential information, except when reasonably necessary to perform
the services under this Agreement. "Confidential information" is limited to:
i. any written or tangible information stamped "confidential,"
"proprietary" or with a similar legend, and
ii. any written or tangible information not marked with a
confidentiality legend, or information disclosed orally to
Consultant, that is treated as confidential when disclosed
and later summarized sufficiently for identification purposes
in a written memorandum marked "confidential" and delivered
to Consultant within 30 days after the disclosure.
/s/AEK /s/DEC
Client Initials Consultant Initials
Exhibit 10.6
Page 3 of 8 Pages
c) Consultant shall have no obligation not to disclose or use any
information that:
i. was in Consultant's possession or known to Consultant, without
an obligation to keep it confidential, before such information
was disclosed to Consultant by Client,
ii. is or becomes public knowledge through a source other than
Consultant and through no fault of Consultant,
iii. is independently developed by or for Consultant,
iv. is disclosed by Client to others without any restriction on
use and disclosure, or
v. is or becomes lawfully available to Consultant from a source
other than Client.
d) Client acknowledges and agrees that the confidentiality restrictions
contained in this Agreement shall not apply to the general
knowledge, skills and experience gained by Consultant or
Consultant's employees while engaged by Client.
e) Consultant will not disclose to Client information or material that
is a trade secret of any third party.
f) The provisions of this clause shall survive any termination of this
Agreement.
10. Term of Agreement:
This Agreement will become effective on the date indicated in the introductory
paragraph of this Agreement, and will remain in effect for 12 months from such
date or until terminated as set forth in the section of this Agreement entitled
"Termination of Agreement."
This Agreement shall be binding, and in full effect, upon any successor
organization of either party hereto.
11. Termination of Agreement:
a) Each party has the right to terminate this Agreement if the other
party has materially breached any obligation herein and such breach
remains uncured for a period of 30 days after notice thereof is sent
/s/AEK /s/DEC
Client Initials Consultant Initials
Exhibit 10.6
Page 4 of 8 Pages
to the other party.
b) If at any time after commencement of the services required by this
Agreement, Client shall, in its sole reasonable judgment, determine
that such services are inadequate, unsatisfactory, no longer needed
or substantially not conforming to the descriptions, warranties or
representations contained in this Agreement, Client may terminate
this Agreement upon 30 days' written notice to Consultant.
c) Upon termination of this Agreement for any reason, each party shall
be released from all obligations and liabilities to the other
occurring or arising after the date of termination. However,
any termination of this Agreement shall not relieve Client from
the obligation to pay Consultant for services rendered prior to
receipt of the notice of termination and for work performed or hours
reserved for Client during the 30-day termination notice period.
12. Return of Materials:
Upon termination of this Agreement, each party shall promptly return to the
other all data, materials and other property of the other held by it.
13. Warranties and Representations: Consultant warrants and represents
that:
a) Consultant will not knowingly infringe upon any copyright, patent,
trade secret or other property right of any former client, employer or third
party in the performance of the services required by this Agreement.
b) Consultant has the authority to enter into this Agreement and to
perform all obligations hereunder, including, but not limited to, the grant of
rights and licenses to the Work Product and Background Technology and all
proprietary rights therein or based thereon.
c) Consultant has not granted any rights or licenses to any
intellectual property or technology that would conflict with Consultant's
obligations under this Agreement.
THE WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS SET FORTH IN THIS CLAUSE ARE THE ONLY
WARRANTIES GRANTED BY CONSULTANT WITH RESPECT TO THE SOFTWARE OR
SERVICES FURNISHED HEREUNDER. CONSULTANT DISCLAIMS ALL OTHER WARRANTIES,
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE,
AND ANY ORAL OR WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS, PROPOSALS OR STATEMENTS MADE
PRIOR TO THIS AGREEMENT.
/s/AEK /s/DEC
Client Initials Consultant Initials
Exhibit 10.6
Page 5 of 8 Pages
14. Indemnities:
Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Client against all losses and
liabilities arising out of or resulting from all injuries or death or damage to
property, including theft, on account of performance of work or services by
Consultant or Consultant's employees or subcontractors pursuant to this
Agreement. Consultant shall maintain liability insurance sufficient to fulfill
its obligations under this paragraph, in amounts acceptable to Client, and shall
submit proof of such insurance to Client upon request. Such insurance may not
be changed by Consultant during the term of this Agreement with Client's prior
written consent.
15. Limitation on Consultant's Liability to Client:
a) In no event shall Consultant be liable to Client for lost profits of
Client, or special, incidental or consequential damages (even if
Consultant has been advised of the possibility of such damages).
b) Consultant's total liability under this Agreement for damages, costs
and expenses, regardless of cause, shall not exceed the total amount
of fees paid to Consultant by Client under this Agreement.
c) Consultant shall not be liable for any claim or demand made against
Client by any third party except to the extent such claim or demand
relates to copyright, patent, trade secret or other proprietary
rights, and then only as provided in the section of this Agreement
entitled "Warranties and Representations."
d) Client shall indemnify Consultant against all claims, liabilities
and costs, including reasonable attorney fees, of defending any
third party claim or suit, other than for infringement of
intellectual property rights, arising out of or in connection with
Client's performance under this Agreement. Consultant shall
promptly notify Client in writing of such claim or suit and Client
shall have the right to fully control the defense and any settlement
of the claim or suit.
16. Employment of Assistants:
a) Consultant may, at Consultant's own expense, employ such assistants
or contractors as Consultant deems necessary to perform the services
required by this Agreement. However, Client shall have the right to
reject any of Consultant's assistants or subcontractors whose
/s/AEK /s/DEC
Client Initials Consultant Initials
Exhibit 10.6
Page 6 of 8 Pages
qualifications in Client's good faith and reasonable judgment are
insufficient for the satisfactory performance of the services
required by this Agreement.
b) Consultant represents that before an employee or subcontractor of
Consultant performs any services required by this Agreement,
Consultant shall either:
i. provide Client with a signed copy of any employment or
independent contractor/consulting agreement effecting the
assignment to Consultant of such employee's or subcontractor's
rights in all copyrightable or patentable software or other
materials he or she creates as a result of the performance of
work or services under this Agreement; or
ii. deliver to Client an Assignment of Rights ("the Assignment")
in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A signed
by such employee or subcontractor. Consultant shall orally
inform each employee or subcontractor of the substance of the
Assignment before he or she executes such form.
17. Mediation and Arbitration:
Except for the right of Consultant to bring suit on an open account for simple
monies due Consultant, any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be
resolved through a mediation-arbitration approach. The parties agree to select
a mutually agreeable, neutral third party to help them mediate any dispute that
arises under the terms of this Agreement. If the mediation is unsuccessful, the
parties agree that the dispute shall be decided by binding arbitration under the
rules of the American Arbitration Association. The decision of the arbitrators
shall be final and binding on the parties and may be entered and enforced in any
court of competent jurisdiction by either party. Costs and fees associated with
the mediation shall be shared equally by the parties. The prevailing party in
the arbitration proceedings shall be awarded reasonable attorney fees, expert
witness costs and expenses, and all other costs and expenses incurred directly
or indirectly in connection with the proceedings, unless the arbitrators shall
for good cause determine otherwise.
18. General Provisions:
a) This Agreement is the sole and entire Agreement between the parties
relating to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior
understandings, agreements and documentation relating to such
subject matter. Any modifications to this Agreement must be in
writing and signed by both parties.
/s/AEK /s/DEC
Client Initials Consultant Initials
Exhibit 10.6
Page 7 of 8 Pages
b) If any provision in this Agreement is held by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining
provisions will continue in full force without being impaired
or invalidated in any way.
c) This Agreement will be governed by the laws of the State of
California.
d) All notices and other communications required or permitted under
this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed given when
delivered personally, or five days after being deposited in the
United States mails, postage prepaid and addressed as follows, or to
such other address as each party may designate in writing:
Client:
Concierge, Inc.
531 Main Street, Ste. 963
El Segundo, CA 90245-3060
Consultant:
Dave Cook Consulting
8701 SE 71st St.
Mercer Island, WA 98040
e) This Agreement does not create any agency or partnership
relationship.
f) This Agreement is not assignable by either party without the prior
written consent of the other.
Client: Concierge, Inc.
By:/s/Allen E. Kahn Date: 3/15/00
------------------------------------------
(Signature)
Allen E. Kahn
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Consultant: Dave Cook Consulting
By:/s/ David E. Cook Date: 3/17/00
- ---------------------------------------------
(Signature)
David E. Cook
Title: Owner
/s/AEK /s/DEC
Client Initials Consultant Initials
Exhibit 10.6
Page 8 of 8 Pages
KABANI & COMPANY, INC.
Certified Public Accountants
8700 Warner Avenue, Suite 280
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Telephone 714-849-1543
Fax 714-596-0303
e-mail: hamidkabani@hotmail.com
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the use of our report dated October 17, 2000, with respect to
the financial statements of Concierge, Inc. included in the Amendment No. 5 to
Form S-4 Registration Statement.
/s/Kabani & Company, Inc.
Kabani & Company, Inc.
Fountain Valley, California
August 27, 2001
Exhibit 23.21
Page 1 of 1 Page
JAAK (JACK) OLESK
Certified Public Accountant
345 North Maple Drive, Suite 284
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
310-288-0693
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT
I consent to the inclusion in Amendment No. 5 to Form S-4 Registration
Statement of Starfest, Inc., of my report dated February 9, 2000, on the balance
sheet of Starfest, Inc. as of December 31, 1999, and the related statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 1999 and the year ended December 31, 1998, except with respect to
Note 4, as to which the date is March 7, 2000.
/s/Jaak Olesk CPA
--------------------------------
JAAK OLESK CPA
Beverly Hills, California
September 10, 2001
Exhibit 23.22
Page 1 of 1 Page
KABANI & COMPANY, INC.
Certified Public Accountants
8700 Warner Avenue, Suite 280
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Telephone 714-849-1543
Fax 714-596-0303
e-mail: hamidkabani@hotmail.com
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the use of our report dated March 21, 2001, with respect to
the financial statements of Starfest, Inc. included in the Amendment No. 5 to
Form S-4 Registration Statement.
/s/Kabani & Company, Inc.
Kabani & Company, Inc.
Fountain Valley, California
August 27, 2001
Exhibit 23.23
Page 1 of 1 Page
FULLER, TUBB, POMEROY & STOKES
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
201 ROBERT S. KERR AVENUE, SUITE 1000
OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102
G. M. FULLER (1920-1999) TELEPHONE 405-235-2575
JERRY TUBB FACSIMILE 405-232-8384
DAVID POMEROY
TERRY STOKES
_____
OF COUNSEL:
MICHAEL A. BICKFORD Thomas J. Kenan e-mail:
THOMAS J. KENAN kenan@ftpslaw.com
ROLAND TAGUE
BRADLEY D. AVEY
August 24, 2001
Suzanne Hayes, Senior Counsel
Division of Corporation Finance
Securities and Exchange Commission
Mail Stop 0409
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549-0409
Re: Starfest, Inc.
Amendment No. 5 to Form S-4
File No. 333-38838
Dear Ms. Hayes:
In response to your comment letter of July 30, 2001, Starfest, Inc. is filing
its Amendment No. 5 to Form S-4. Set forth below are Starfest's responses to
each of the comments in your July 30, 2001 letter.
General
- -------
1. The request for confidential treatment of portions of Exhibits 10.2
with eAssist and 10.3 with Dave Cook Consulting has been withdrawn. The two
exhibits have been amended in this filing to include the matter earlier omitted.
Summary of Proposed Transaction, page 2
- --------------------------------------------
2. The comparison of the values of the stocks of the two companies has
been updated to the most recent date of financial statements of both companies.
Suzanne Hayes
August 24, 2001
Page 2
Financial Statements, page 36
- --------------------------------
3. The dual date of the independent auditor's report is now included.
Starfest Financial Statements
- -------------------------------
4. The value of 1.3 million shares issued for consulting services has
been restated at $65,000, which approximates the market value of such shares on
the date of issuance.
Starfest's accounting policy for stock-based compensation has been
revised to disclose the recording of "Issuance of shares for service."
5. Disclosures of recent pronouncements have been revised to state that
adoption of such statements is expected to be immaterial to the financial
statements.
Concierge Financial Statements
- --------------------------------
6. The accounting policy for revenue has been revised to reflect
one-time purchase price rather than monthly service fee.
7. The company does not have a continuing service obligation to the
customers after they purchase the product for one-time service fees, because the
company has put an FAQ (frequently asked questions) page on its website which
will cater to the need of customers.
8. The option of buying upgrades is based on the fair values of the
upgrades and has been disclosed in the notes to the financial statements.
9. The accounting policy for stock-based compensation has been
clarified to disclose the recording of compensation expenses per APB 25.
10. The company had entered into the consulting agreement with Mr. Gary
Bryant on December 6, 1999. The value of services and the number of shares had
been determined at that time, which reflected Concierge's shares' then fair
value. Since then, the company came out with the plan of merger with Starfest,
Inc. and its value increased. The company was able to get the value of shares
at 14.79 per share based upon a post-merger valuation of shares (at 1:70).
11. Disclosures of accounting developments have been revised to state
that the adoption of such statements is expected to be immaterial to the
financial statements.
12. The term of the licenses has been disclosed in note 5 to the
financial statements, and it is stated that the prepaid royalties will be
amortized over the 5-year term of the licenses.
13. Note 9 to the financial statements has been revised to reflect a
Suzanne Hayes
August 24, 2001
Page 3
contingent liability of $2,009,610 at the balance sheet date.
14. Note 10 has been expanded to describe the accounting acquirer in
the reverse merger.
15. Exhibit 23.19 has been revised to include the dual date of the
audit opinion in the consent from Mr. Olesk and is now filed as Exhibit 23.22.
Closing Comments
- -----------------
There are now provided Starfest's interim statements for its six months
ended 06-30-01.
If you have any questions that might be properly handled by conversing with
the undersigned, please do so at my telephone number 405-235-2575, fax number
405-232-8384, or e-mail at kenan@ftpslaw.com.
Sincerely,
/s/Thomas J. Kenan
Thomas J. Kenan
e-mail: kenan@ftpslaw.com
cc: Michael Huemmer
Allen Kahn
Hamid Kabani, C.P.A.
Jaak Olesk