Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of Contents
INDEX TO ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 23,November 8, 2013

Registration No. 333-191155

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



Amendment No. 12
to

FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Under
The Securities Act of 1933



ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 6282
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
 13-4064930
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

1345 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10105
(212) 969-1000
(Address including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant's principal executive offices)



Laurence E. Cranch, Esq.
AllianceBernstein L.P.
1345 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10105
(212) 969-1000
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)



Copies to:

Nicholas G. Demmo, Esq.
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
51 West 52nd St.
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: (212) 403-1000
Facsimile: (212) 403-2000

 

Michael Maquet
Chief Executive Officer
W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd.
527 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: (212) 750-8585
Facsimile: (212) 371-6272

 

Richard F. Langan, Esq.
Daniel McAvoy, Esq.
Nixon Peabody LLP
437 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10022
Telephone: (212) 940-3000
Facsimile: (212) 940-3111

Approximate Date of Commencement of Proposed Sale to the Public:
As soon as practicable after the effectiveness of this registration statement and the satisfaction or waiver of
all other conditions under the merger agreement described herein.

           If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, please check the following box.    o

           If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

           If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o

           Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer ý
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)
 Smaller reporting company o

           If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the appropriate rule provisions relied upon in conducting this transaction:

           Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender Offer)    o

           Exchange Act Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross-Border Third-Party Tender Offer)    o

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

        
 
Title of Each Class of Securities
to be Registered

 Amount to be
Registered(1)

 Proposed Maximum
Offering Price Per
Share

 Proposed Maximum
Aggregate Offering
Price(2)

 Amount of
Registration Fee(3)(4)

 

Contingent Value Rights (CVRs)

 4,958,778 Not Applicable $247,939 $34

 

(1)
Represents the estimated maximum number of Contingent Value Rights of AllianceBernstein L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, issuable to holders of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, of W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd., a Delaware corporation, upon completion of the proposed merger of AllianceBernstein 2013 Merger Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein L.P., with and into W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd. described herein. This number is based on the number of shares of W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd. common stock outstanding and reserved for issuance as of September 11, 2013, and the exchange of each such share for one CVR in the merger.

(2)
Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rules 457(c) and (f) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, based upon the product of (a) $12.05, the average of the high and low prices of W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd. common stock as reported on the over-the-counter market on September 11, 2013 and (b) 4,958,778, the estimated maximum number of shares of W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd. common stock that may be exchanged for the merger consideration. The product of (a) and (b) above is then reduced by $59,505,336 million, the estimated cash payment to be made to W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd. stockholders upon the closing of the above-referenced merger.

(3)
Computed pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, at a rate of $136.40 per $1,000,000 of the proposed maximum aggregate offering price.

(4)
Amount previously paid in connection with AllianceBernstein's filing of Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-191155), which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2013.

           The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

   


Table of Contents

Information contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective. This document shall not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction.

Subject to completion, dated October 23,November 8, 2013


MERGER PROPOSAL—YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT

Dear Stockholder:

        The board of directors of W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd. (which we refer to as "W.P. Stewart") has approved a merger agreement that provides for the merger of AllianceBernstein 2013 Merger Company, Inc. (which we refer to as "Merger Sub"), a wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein L.P. (which we refer to as "AllianceBernstein"), with and into W.P. Stewart. As a result of the merger, W.P. Stewart will become a wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein.

        As is more fully described in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus, in connection with the merger, W.P. Stewart stockholders will be entitled to receive, for each share of W.P. Stewart common stock that they hold (other than a portion of the restricted shares held by an executive officer of W.P. Stewart, which shall be forfeited, and other than certain shares held by W.P. Stewart, AllianceBernstein, Merger Sub or their direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, and shares for which appraisal rights have been properly demanded under Delaware law), (i) $12.00 per share in cash, less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest, and (ii) one contingent value right (which we refer to as a "CVR") issued by AllianceBernstein. Each CVR will entitle its holder to receive an additional cash payment, less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest, of $4.00 to the extent that the "assets under management" (as defined in "Description of the CVRs" below) of W.P. Stewart exceeds $5,000,000,000 on or prior to the third anniversary of the closing of the merger, determined in accordance with the CVR agreement described in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus. Based on the current number of shares of W.P. Stewart common stock outstanding and reserved for issuance, AllianceBernstein expects to issue approximately 4,958,778 CVRs upon completion of the merger. However, any increase or decrease in the number of shares of W.P. Stewart common stock outstanding that occurs for any reason prior to the completion of the merger would cause the actual number of CVRs issued upon completion of the merger to change.

        We describe in detail the terms of the merger, including the contingent value rights, in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus under the captions "Certain Terms of the Merger Agreement" and "Description of the CVRs" beginning on pages [        ] and [        ], which we urge you to read carefully. The common stock of W.P. Stewart is traded in the Pink Sheets under the symbol "WPSL." There is currently no public market for the CVRs.

        The merger cannot be completed unless W.P. Stewart stockholders adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger contemplated by the merger agreement at the special meeting of W.P. Stewart stockholders to be held on [        ], 2013 at the offices of Nixon Peabody LLP, located at 437 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022, at [        ] local time. We describe in detail the special meeting of W.P. Stewart stockholders in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus under the caption "The Special Meeting of W.P. Stewart Stockholders" beginning on page [        ], which we urge you to read carefully. More information about AllianceBernstein, W.P. Stewart and the merger is contained in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus.We encourage you to read the proxy statement/prospectus and to carefully consider theRisk Factors beginning on page 20 of the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus before voting.

        Your vote is very important.    Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting of W.P. Stewart stockholders, please take the time to vote your shares. You may vote your shares by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope.

        Thank you for your continued support.

By order of the board of directors,

Michael Maquet
Chief Executive Officer
W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd.

        NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED OF THE SECURITIES TO BE ISSUED IN CONNECTION WITH THE MERGER, OR PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

        This proxy statement/prospectus is dated [        ], 2013, and is first being mailed to W.P. Stewart stockholders on or about [        ], 2013.


Table of Contents

W.P. STEWART & CO., LTD.

527 MADISON AVE., 20TH FLOOR
NEW YORK, NY 10022

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON [                ], 2013

To the Stockholders of W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd.:

        We will hold a special meeting of the stockholders of W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd., a Delaware corporation, on [                ], 2013 at [                ], local time, at the offices of Nixon Peabody LLP, located at 437 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022 to consider and vote upon the following matters:

        The W.P. Stewart board of directors has adopted the merger agreement and approved the merger, and recommends that the stockholders voteFOR the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger andFOR the proposal to adjourn the special meeting to a later date, if necessary.

        The close of business on [                ], 2013 has been fixed by the W.P. Stewart board of directors as the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Only holders of record of W.P. Stewart common stock at the close of business on the record date may attend and vote at the special meeting.

        All stockholders entitled to vote are cordially invited to attend the special meeting in person. However, to ensure your representation at the special meeting, you are urged to complete, sign and return the enclosed proxy card as promptly as possible in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope. You may revoke your proxy in the manner described in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus at any time before it is voted at the special meeting. Executed proxies with no instructions indicated thereon will be votedFOR the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger,FOR the proposal to adjourn the special meeting to a later date, if necessary, and, in the discretion of the proxy holders, on any other proposals that may properly come before the special meeting.

        If you plan on attending the special meeting and your shares are held in the name of a broker, trust, bank or other nominee, you should bring with you a proxy or letter from the broker, trustee, bank or nominee confirming your beneficial ownership of the shares. If you plan to vote via proxy and your shares are held in your broker's name, please note that your broker will not be permitted to vote on the adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the merger or the proposal to adjourn the special meeting to a later date, if necessary, or on any other proposal that properly comes before the special meeting unless you provide your broker with instructions on how to vote.

        The enclosed proxy statement/prospectus provides a detailed description of the special meeting, the merger, the documents related to the merger and other related matters. We urge you to read the proxy statement/prospectus and its annexes carefully and in their entirety.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Seth L. Pearlstein
General Counsel & Secretary


Table of Contents


THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS INCORPORATES ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

        The Exhibits to the Registration Statement on Form S-4, of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, incorporate important business and financial information about AllianceBernstein from documents that are not included in or delivered with this proxy statement/prospectus.

        AllianceBernstein will provide you with copies of this information relating to AllianceBernstein without charge, upon written or oral request to:

AllianceBernstein L.P.
1345 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10105
Attn: Investor Relations
(212) 969-1000

        In order to receive timely delivery of the documents before the special meeting, you must make your requests no later than [                ], 2013. If you request any incorporated documents, AllianceBernstein will mail them to you by first class mail, or another equally prompt means, within one business day of receipt of your request.


ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS

        This proxy statement, which forms a part of a registration statement on Form S-4 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, by AllianceBernstein, constitutes a prospectus of AllianceBernstein under Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, with respect to the CVRs to be issued to W.P. Stewart stockholders in connection with the merger. This document also constitutes a proxy statement and a notice of meeting with respect to the special meeting of W.P. Stewart stockholders to consider and vote upon the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger.


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  
 Page 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER

  1 

SUMMARY

  7 

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN L.P. SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  17 

RISK FACTORS

  20 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

  38 

THE COMPANIES

  41 

AllianceBernstein

  41 

Business

  41 

Properties

  64 

Legal Proceedings

  65 

Management's Discussion and Analysis

  66 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

  117118 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

  129130 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  155156 

AllianceBernstein 2013 Merger Company, Inc. 

  167168 

W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd. 

  167168 

Business

  167168 

Management's Discussion and Analysis

  173174 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

  180181 

THE SPECIAL MEETING OF W.P. STEWART STOCKHOLDERS

  182183 

General

  182183 

Date, Time and Place

  182183 

Purpose of the Meeting

  182183 

Quorum Required

  182183 

Voting Rights

  182183 

Proxies

  183184 

Revocation of Proxies

  183184 

W.P. Stewart Votes Required

  183184 

Recommendation of W.P. Stewart's Board of Directors

  184185 

Voting in Person

  184185 

Adjournments and Postponements

  184185 

Stock Certificates

  185186 

Solicitation of Proxies

  185186 

Questions and Additional Information

  185186 

THE MERGER

  186187 

General

  186187 

General Description of the Merger

  186187 

Background of the Merger

  187188 

W.P. Stewart's Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of W.P. Stewart Board of Directors

  191192 

Opinion of W.P. Stewart's Financial Advisor

  195196 

AllianceBernstein's Reasons for the Merger

  203204 

Interests of W.P. Stewart's Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger

  204205 

Regulatory Filings and Approvals Required to Complete the Merger

  206207 

Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger

  207208 

Anticipated Accounting Treatment

  209210 

Public Trading Markets

  210211 

i


Table of Contents

 
  
 Page 

Appraisal Rights of Dissenting W.P. Stewart Stockholders

  210211 

CERTAIN TERMS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT

  214215 

The Merger

  214215 

Effective Time of the Merger

  214215 

Manner and Basis of Converting Shares

  214215 

Equity Awards

  215216 

Representations and Warranties

  216217 

Conduct of Business Pending the Merger

  218219 

Other Covenants

  220221 

Conditions to the Merger

  225226 

Termination of the Merger Agreement

  227228 

Termination Fee

  228229 

Amendment

  229230 

Employment Agreements

  230231 

Voting Agreements

  230231 

William P. Stewart Voting Agreement

  231232 

DESCRIPTION OF THE CVRS

  232233 

CVR Agreement

  232233 

Trust Indenture Act

  232233 

Characteristics of the CVRs

  232233 

AUM Milestone

  232233 

AUM Milestone Payment Date

  234 

Issuance of CVRs

  234 

Transferability of CVRs

  234 

Registration and Transfers

  234 

Ranking

  235236 

Reporting Obligations

  235236 

AUM Milestone Review Procedures

  235237 

Efforts

  236237 

Breach

  237238 

Amendment of CVR Agreement Without Consent of CVR Holders

  238239 

Amendment of CVR Agreement with Consent of CVR Holders

  239240 

Purchases of CVRs by AllianceBernstein

  239240 

Limitation on Suits by Holders

  239240 

Unconditional Right of Holders to Institute Certain Suits

  239240 

Control by Holders; Removal of Trustee

  240241 

W.P. STEWART MARKET PRICE, DIVIDEND AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

  241242 

EXPERTS

  242243 

LEGAL MATTERS

  242243 

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

  242243 

INDEX TO ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  F-1 

    

ii


Table of Contents

Page  
  
 
ANNEXES    

Annex A

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger

  A-1 

Annex B

 

Form of Contingent Value Rights Agreement

  B-1 

Annex C

 

Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware

  C-1 

Annex D

 

Opinion of Duff & Phelps, LLC

  D-1 

Annex E

 

Form of Voting Agreement

  E-1 

Annex F

 

William P. Stewart Voting Agreement

  F-1 

iii


Table of Contents


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER

Q:
Why am I receiving this proxy statement/prospectus?

A:
AllianceBernstein L.P., or AllianceBernstein, has agreed to acquire W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd., or W.P. Stewart, under the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 15, 2013, as it may be amended from time to time (which we refer to as the "merger agreement"), that is described in this proxy statement/prospectus. Please see the sections entitled "The Merger" and "Certain Terms of the Merger Agreement" beginning on pages [            ] and [            ], respectively, of this proxy statement/prospectus. A copy of the merger agreement is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A. Under the merger agreement, AllianceBernstein 2013 Merger Company, Inc. (which we refer to as "Merger Sub"), a wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein, will merge with and into W.P. Stewart (which we refer to as the "merger"). As a result of the merger, W.P. Stewart will become a wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein.

In order to complete the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, W.P. Stewart stockholders must adopt the merger agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of W.P. Stewart common stock outstanding on the record date for the special meeting and all other conditions to the merger must be satisfied or waived. You are receiving this proxy statement/prospectus because you have been identified as a W.P. Stewart stockholder as of [            ], 2013, the record date for the special meeting, and thus you are entitled to vote at the special meeting. This document serves as a proxy statement/prospectus of W.P. Stewart, used to solicit proxies for the special meeting, and as a prospectus of AllianceBernstein, used to offer CVRs to stockholders of W.P. Stewart pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement. This document contains important information about the merger and the special meeting, and you should read it carefully.

Q:
When and where is the special meeting of W.P. Stewart stockholders?

A:
The special meeting of W.P. Stewart stockholders will be held on [            ], 2013, starting at [            ], local time, at the offices of Nixon Peabody LLP, located at 437 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022.

Q:
On what matters am I being asked to vote?

A:
W.P. Stewart stockholders are being asked to consider and vote on the following items:

the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger;

a proposal to adjourn the special meeting to a later date, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in the event there are insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger; and

to transact such other business as may properly come before the special meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

Q:
What is the merger?

A:
Under the terms of the merger agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into W.P. Stewart, with W.P. Stewart continuing as the surviving entity. Upon completion of the merger, each outstanding share of W.P. Stewart common stock (other than a portion of the restricted shares held by an executive officer of W.P. Stewart, which shall be forfeited, and other than certain shares held by W.P. Stewart, AllianceBernstein, Merger Sub or their direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, and shares for which appraisal rights have been properly demanded under Delaware law) will be converted into the right to receive $12.00 in cash, less any applicable withholding taxes and without

Table of Contents

Q:
As a W.P. Stewart stockholder, what will I receive in the merger?

A:
If the merger agreement is adopted by W.P. Stewart stockholders and the other conditions to the merger are satisfied or waived, then upon completion of the merger, other than a portion of the restricted shares held by an executive officer of W.P. Stewart, which shall be forfeited, and other than certain shares held by W.P. Stewart, AllianceBernstein, Merger Sub or their direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, and shares for which appraisal rights have been properly demanded under Delaware law, W.P. Stewart stockholders will be entitled to receive (i) $12.00 per share in cash, less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest, and (ii) one contingent value right per share, or CVR, representing the right to receive an additional cash payment of $4.00, less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest, if and to the extent that any amount is payable as determined in accordance with the CVR agreement to be entered into in connection with the merger. We refer to the consideration for the merger described in clauses (i) and (ii) together as the merger consideration. Please see the sections entitled "The Merger—General" and "Description of the CVRs" beginning on pages [            ] and [            ], respectively, of this proxy statement/prospectus for a description of the merger consideration.

Q:
How are equity awards treated in the merger?

A:
As of the effective time of the merger, each restricted share of W.P. Stewart common stock granted to any employee or director of W.P. Stewart or any of its subsidiaries (other than a portion of the restricted shares held by an executive officer of W.P. Stewart, which shall be forfeited) under a W.P. Stewart stock plan that is outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive the merger consideration, subject to such deduction and withholding as may be required under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or the Code, and any applicable state or local tax law with respect to the lapsing of the restrictions on any such restricted shares.

Q:
What is required to consummate the merger?

A:
To consummate the merger, W.P. Stewart stockholders must adopt the merger agreement, which requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of W.P. Stewart common stock outstanding on the record date for the special meeting. In addition to obtaining W.P. Stewart stockholder approval, each of the other closing conditions set forth in the merger agreement must be satisfied or waived. For a more complete description of the closing conditions under the merger agreement, please see the section entitled "Certain Terms of the Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Merger" beginning on page [            ] of this proxy statement/prospectus.

Q:
How does the W.P. Stewart board of directors recommend that I vote?

A:
After careful consideration, W.P. Stewart's board of directors approved the merger agreement and the merger and declared that the merger agreement and the merger, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, are advisable and in the best interests of W.P. Stewart and its stockholders. Accordingly, W.P. Stewart's board of directors recommends that you vote FOR the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger, and FOR the proposal to adjourn the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in the event there are insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger. To review the background of the merger and W.P. Stewart's board of directors' reasons for recommending the merger in greater detail, see the

Table of Contents

Q:
What is the vote required to approve each proposal at the W.P. Stewart special meeting?

A:
W.P. Stewart merger proposal

Standard:  The approval of the W.P. Stewart merger proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of W.P. Stewart common stock entitled to vote on the proposal.

Effect of abstentions and non-votes:  If you fail to vote, mark "ABSTAIN" on your proxy or fail to instruct your bank, broker or other nominee with respect to the W.P. Stewart merger proposal, it will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the proposal.
Q:
What constitutes a quorum for the W.P. Stewart special meeting?

A:
The presence of the holders of one-third of the outstanding shares of W.P. Stewart common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting constitutes a quorum for the transaction of business at the meeting.

Q:
What risks should I consider in deciding whether to vote in favor of the merger?

A:
You should carefully review the section of this proxy statement/prospectus entitled "Risk Factors" beginning on page [            ] of this proxy statement/prospectus, which sets forth certain risks and uncertainties related to the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

Q:
When do the parties expect to complete the merger?

A:
The parties are working towards completing the merger as quickly as possible. The merger is currently expected to close during the last calendar quarter ofDecember 2013. However, because completion of the merger is subject to various conditions, AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart cannot predict the exact timing of the merger or whether the merger will occur at all.

Q:
Am I entitled to appraisal rights?

A:
W.P. Stewart stockholders will have the right to demand appraisal of their shares of W.P. Stewart common stock and obtain payment in cash for the fair value of their shares, but only if they perfect their appraisal rights and comply with the applicable provisions of Delaware law. A copy of the Delaware statutory provisions related to appraisal rights is attached as Annex C to this proxy statement/prospectus, and a summary of these provisions can be found in the section entitled "The

Table of Contents

Q:
Will my rights as a W.P. Stewart stockholder change as a result of the merger?

A:
Yes. You will no longer be a W.P. Stewart stockholder, and you will become a holder of CVRs issued by AllianceBernstein as a result of the merger and will have rights after the completion of the merger that are governed by the CVR agreement.

Q:
Will I be able to trade the CVRs that I receive in connection with the merger?

A:
The CVRs issued to W.P. Stewart stockholders in connection with the merger will not be listed on any securities exchange but will be generally tradable, subject to certain procedures as set forth in more detail in this proxy statement/prospectus and the CVR agreement.

Q:
What are the United States federal income tax consequences of the merger?

A:
The receipt of the merger consideration in exchange for W.P. Stewart shares will be a taxable transaction for United States federal income tax purposes. For more information regarding the United States federal income tax consequences of the merger, see the section entitled "The Merger—Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger" beginning on page [            ] of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Q:
What should I do now?

A:
You should carefully read this proxy statement/prospectus, including its annexes, and consider how the merger will affect you. AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart urge you to then respond by voting your shares through one of the following means:

by mail, by completing, signing, dating and mailing each proxy card (if you are a registered stockholder, meaning that you hold your stock in your name) and returning it in the envelope provided; or

in person, by attending the special meeting and submitting your vote in person (special requirements apply if your shares are held in "street name" and you wish to vote in person).

Q:
What happens if I do not return a proxy card or otherwise vote?

A:
The failure to return your proxy card or vote in person at the special meeting will have the same effect as voting AGAINST adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger, and will have no effect on the proposal for possible adjournment of the special meeting.

Q:
What happens if I return a signed and dated proxy card but do not indicate how to vote my proxy?

Table of Contents

A:
If you do not include instructions on how to vote your properly signed and dated proxy, your shares will be voted FOR adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger, and FOR approval of possible adjournment, if any, of the special meeting.

Q:
May I vote in person at the special meeting?

A:
If your shares of W.P. Stewart common stock are registered directly in your name, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record, and the proxy materials and proxy card are being sent directly to you by W.P. Stewart. If you are a W.P. Stewart stockholder of record, you may attend the special meeting and vote your shares in person, rather than signing and returning your proxy card.
Q:
May I change my vote after I have mailed my signed and dated proxy card or otherwise voted?

A:
Yes. If you have submitted a proxy, you may change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the W.P. Stewart special meeting of stockholders. You can do this one of the following ways. First, you can send a written, dated notice to Proxy Services, c/o Computershare Investor Services, P.O. Box 43126, Providence, RI 02949-5138 stating that you would like to revoke your proxy. Second, you can complete, sign, date and submit (in time to reach W.P. Stewart before the beginning of the special meeting) a new later-dated proxy card. Third, if you are a stockholder of record or you obtain a "legal proxy" from your broker, trustee or nominee, you can attend the special meeting and vote in person. Your attendance at the special meeting alone will not revoke your proxy.
Q:
If my shares are held in "street name" by a bank, broker or other nominee, will they automatically vote my shares for me?

A:
No. Your bank, broker or other nominee will not be able to vote your shares without instructions from you. Therefore, you should provide your bank, broker or other nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares, following the procedure they provide to you. The failure to provide such voting instructions to your bank, broker or other nominee will have the same effect as voting AGAINST adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger, and will have no effect on the proposal for possible adjournment of the special meeting.

Q:
Should I send in my W.P. Stewart stock certificates now?

A:
No. If you are a W.P. Stewart stockholder, after the merger is completed a letter of transmittal will be sent to you informing you where to deliver your W.P. Stewart stock certificates in order to receive the merger consideration. You should not send in your W.P. Stewart common stock certificates before receiving the letter of transmittal.

Q:
Who is soliciting this proxy?

Table of Contents

A:
W.P. Stewart is conducting this proxy solicitation and will bear the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition, W.P. Stewart may reimburse brokers, banks and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding soliciting materials to such beneficial owners. W.P. Stewart's directors, officers and employees may also solicit proxies by personal interview, mail, e-mail, telephone, facsimile or other means of communication. These persons will not be paid additional remuneration for their efforts.

Q:
What happens if the merger is not completed?

A:
If the merger is not completed, holders of W.P. Stewart common stock will not receive any consideration for their shares in connection with the merger. Instead, W.P. Stewart will remain an independent company. In addition, if the merger agreement is terminated in certain circumstances, a termination fee may be required to be paid by W.P. Stewart to AllianceBernstein. See "Certain Terms of the Merger Agreement—Termination Fee" for a complete discussion of the circumstances in which a termination fee will be required to be paid.

Q:
Who can help answer my additional questions?

A:
W.P. Stewart stockholders who would like additional copies, without charge, of this proxy statement/prospectus or have additional questions about the merger, including the procedures for voting their shares of W.P. Stewart common stock, should contact:

Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3078
(877) 373-6374


Table of Contents


SUMMARY

        This summary highlights selected information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus. You should read carefully this entire proxy statement/prospectus and the documents referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus for a more complete description of the terms of the merger and related transactions. The merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus, and the form of CVR agreement related thereto is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement/prospectus. You are encouraged to read the merger agreement as it is the legal document that governs the merger. It is also important that you read the form of CVR agreement. In this proxy statement/prospectus, unless the context otherwise requires, "AllianceBernstein" refers to AllianceBernstein L.P. and its subsidiaries, "W.P. Stewart" refers to W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd. and its subsidiaries, and "Merger Sub" refers to AllianceBernstein 2013 Merger Company, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein.


The Companies (pages [    ] and [    ] and [    ])

AllianceBernstein L.P.

        AllianceBernstein is an investment adviser registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. It is a leading global investment management firm supervising client accounts with assets totaling approximately $435$445 billion as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, of which more than $86$88 billion represented assets of registered investment companies. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, AllianceBernstein managed 33 registered investment companies comprising approximately 119 separate investment portfolios. AllianceBernstein provides management services for many of the largest U.S. public and private employee benefit plans, endowments, foundations, public employee retirement funds, banks, insurance companies and high net worth individuals worldwide.

        AllianceBernstein's principal executive offices are located at 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10105. AllianceBernstein's telephone number is (212) 969-1000.

AllianceBernstein 2013 Merger Company, Inc.

        AllianceBernstein 2013 Merger Company, Inc., or Merger Sub, is a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein organized in August 2013 in connection with the execution of the merger agreement. Merger Sub was formed solely to facilitate the merger. The location of its principal executive offices and its telephone number are the same as those of AllianceBernstein.

W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd.

        W.P. Stewart is an asset management company that has provided research-intensive equity management services to clients throughout the world since 1975. W.P. Stewart is headquartered in New York, New York and has additional operations or affiliates in Europe and Asia. W.P. Stewart's principal executive offices are located at 527 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10022. W.P. Stewart's telephone number is (212) 750-8585.


Special Meeting of W.P. Stewart Stockholders (page [    ])

        General.    W.P. Stewart is furnishing this proxy statement/prospectus to W.P. Stewart stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the W.P. Stewart board of directors for use at the special meeting of stockholders, including any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting.

        Date, Time and Place.    W.P. Stewart will hold its special meeting on [            ], 2013 at [                    ], local time, at the offices of Nixon Peabody LLP, located at 437 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022.

 


Table of Contents

        Purpose of the Meeting.    At the special meeting, W.P. Stewart stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon the following matters:

        Quorum Required.    W.P. Stewart's bylaws provide that the holders of one-third of the shares of stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the special meeting. In the event that a quorum is not present at the special meeting, the special meeting may be adjourned, either by the chairman of the meeting or by vote of the holders of a majority of the shares represented at such meeting.

        Voting Rights.    W.P. Stewart common stock is the only type of security entitled to vote at the special meeting. On [            ], 2013, the record date for determination of stockholders entitled to vote at the special meeting, there were [            ] shares of W.P. Stewart common stock outstanding. Each W.P. Stewart stockholder of record on [            ], 2013 is entitled to one vote for each share of W.P. Stewart common stock held by such stockholder on that date. If shares or other securities having voting power stand of record in the names of two or more persons, whether fiduciaries, members of a partnership, joint tenants, tenants in common, tenants by the entirety, or otherwise, or if two or more persons have the same fiduciary relationship respecting the same shares, unless the Secretary of W.P. Stewart is given written notice to the contrary and is furnished with a copy of the instrument or order appointing them or creating the relationship wherein it is so provided, their acts with respect to voting shall have the following effect: (a) if only one votes, his act binds all; (b) if more than one votes, the act of the majority so voting binds all; (c) if more than one votes, but the vote is evenly split, each faction may vote the common stock proportionally, or may apply to the Delaware Court of Chancery for relief as provided in the DGCL, Section 217(b). If the instrument filed with the Secretary of W.P. Stewart shows that any such tenancy is held in unequal interests, a majority or even-split for the purpose of (c) above shall be a majority or even-split in interest.

        Proxies.    Whether or not you are able to attend W.P. Stewart's special meeting of stockholders, you are urged to complete and return the enclosed proxy, which is solicited by W.P. Stewart's board of directors and which will be voted as you direct on your proxy card when properly completed. In the event no directions are specified, executed proxies will be voted FOR the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger, FOR the proposal to adjourn the special meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger, and in the discretion of the proxy holders as to any other matters that may properly come before the special meeting. All shares represented by a valid proxy received before the special meeting will be voted.

        Revocation of Proxies.    You may also revoke or change your proxy at any time before the special meeting. To do this, send a written notice of revocation or another signed proxy with a later date to Proxy Services, c/o Computershare Investor Services, P.O. Box 43126, Providence, RI 02949-5138 in

 


Table of Contents

time to be received before the beginning of the special meeting. You may also revoke your proxy by attending the special meeting and voting in person.

        W.P. Stewart Votes Required.    The affirmative vote of the holders of record of a majority of the outstanding shares of W.P. Stewart common stock is required to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger, and the affirmative vote of the holders of record of a majority of the shares of W.P. Stewart common stock present and entitled to vote at the special meeting is required to adopt the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies. If a broker or other nominee holding shares of W.P. Stewart common stock or a holder of W.P. Stewart common stock fails to vote on the adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the merger or responds to that proposal with an "abstain" vote, it will have the same effect as a vote against that proposal. If a broker or other nominee holding shares of W.P. Stewart common stock or a holder of W.P. Stewart common stock responds to the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies with an "abstain" vote, it will have the same effect as a vote against that proposal. If a broker or other nominee holding W.P. Stewart common stock or a holder of W.P. Stewart common stock fails to vote on the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies, it will have no effect on the outcome of the vote for that proposal.

        As of the record date, (i) the directors and executive officers of W.P. Stewart beneficially owned approximately [            ] shares of W.P. Stewart common stock, representing approximately [      ]% of the outstanding shares of W.P. Stewart common stock and (ii) AllianceBernstein and its affiliates beneficially owned none of W.P. Stewart's common stock.

        Certain holders of W.P. Stewart common stock, each of which is or is an affiliate of a member of W.P. Stewart's board of directors, who as of the record date collectively owned approximately [      ]% of the outstanding shares of W.P. Stewart common stock, have entered into voting agreements with AllianceBernstein pursuant to which such stockholders have agreed, among other things, to vote the shares of common stock of W.P. Stewart owned by them in favor of adopting the merger agreement and approving the merger. In addition, William P. Stewart has entered into an agreement pursuant to which he has agreed to vote the shares over which he has sole voting authority in favor of adopting the merger agreement and approving the merger. For a description of the voting agreements, see "Certain Terms of the Merger Agreement—Voting Agreements" beginning on page [    ] of this proxy statement/prospectus.

        Solicitation of Proxies.    W.P. Stewart will bear the cost of this solicitation, including the printing and mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus, the proxy and any additional soliciting material furnished to W.P. Stewart stockholders. Copies of solicitation material will be furnished to brokerage houses, fiduciaries and custodians holding shares in their names that are beneficially owned by others so that they may forward this solicitation material to such beneficial owners. In addition, W.P. Stewart may reimburse such persons for their costs of forwarding the solicitation material to such beneficial owners. The original solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by solicitation by telephone, email, facsimile or other means by directors, officers, employees or agents of W.P. Stewart. No additional compensation will be paid to these individuals for any such services.


Risk Factors (page [    ])

        You should carefully review the section of this proxy statement/prospectus entitled "Risk Factors" beginning on page [    ] of this proxy statement/prospectus, which sets forth certain risks and uncertainties related to the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. These risk factors should be considered along with any additional risk factors in the reports of AllianceBernstein filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and any other information included in this proxy statement/ prospectus.

 


Table of Contents


Recommendation to W.P. Stewart's Stockholders (page [    ])

        W.P. Stewart's board of directors has adopted the merger agreement and approved the merger. The board of directors of W.P. Stewart recommends that W.P. Stewart stockholders voteFOR the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger, andFOR the approval of the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger, at the time of the special meeting.


Merger Structure; Merger Consideration (pages [    ] and [    ])

        In the merger, Merger Sub will merge with and into W.P. Stewart, with W.P. Stewart continuing as the surviving corporation. Upon completion of the merger, each share of W.P. Stewart common stock (other than a portion of the restricted shares held by an executive officer of W.P. Stewart, which shall be forfeited, and other than certain shares held by W.P. Stewart, AllianceBernstein, Merger Sub or their direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, and shares for which appraisal rights have been properly demanded under Delaware law) will be converted into the right to receive (i) $12.00, less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest, per share and (ii) one CVR representing the right to receive an additional cash payment of $4.00, less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest, if and to the extent that any amount is payable as determined in accordance with the CVR agreement to be entered into in connection with the merger.

        The common stock of W.P. Stewart is traded in the Pink Sheets under the symbol "WPSL." There is currently no public market for the CVRs. As of August 15, 2013, the last full trading day before the public announcement of the merger agreement, the closing price of W.P. Stewart common stock was $7.24. As of [            ], 2013, the last practicable trading day before the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, the closing price of W.P. Stewart common stock was $[            ].


CVR Agreement and CVRs (page [    ] and Annex B)

        In connection with the closing of the merger, AllianceBernstein and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as trustee, will enter into a contingent value rights agreement substantially in the form of the contingent value rights agreement included in this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B (which we refer to as the "CVR agreement"), which will set forth the terms of the CVRs to be issued to W.P. Stewart stockholders upon completion of the merger. A holder of a CVR is entitled to a cash payment in an amount equal to $4.00 per CVR, less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest (which we refer to as the "AUM milestone payment"), upon the achievement of the AUM milestone (as defined elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus). For a detailed description of the CVR agreement, see "Description of the CVRs" beginning on page [    ] of this proxy statement/prospectus.


Treatment of Equity Awards (page [    ])

        As of the effective time of the merger, each restricted share of W.P. Stewart common stock granted to any employee or director of W.P. Stewart or any of its subsidiaries (other than a portion of the restricted shares held by an executive officer of W.P. Stewart, which shall be forfeited) under a W.P. Stewart stock plan that is outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive the merger consideration, subject to such deduction and withholding as may be required under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and any applicable state or local tax law with respect to the lapsing of the restrictions on any such restricted shares.

 


Table of Contents


W.P. Stewart's Reasons for the Merger (page [    ])

        After careful consideration, W.P. Stewart's board of directors adopted the merger agreement and approved the merger and declared that the merger agreement and the merger, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, are advisable and in the best interests of W.P. Stewart and its stockholders. W.P. Stewart's board of directors consulted with W.P. Stewart's senior management, as well as W.P. Stewart's financial advisor and legal counsel, in reaching its decision to approve the merger.

        W.P. Stewart's board of directors recommends that you voteFOR the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger, andFOR the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies. Please see the section entitled "The Merger—W.P. Stewart's Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of W.P. Stewart Board of Directors" beginning on page [    ] of this proxy statement/prospectus for a full discussion of the factors that W.P. Stewart's board of directors considered in reaching its decision to approve the merger.


Opinion of W.P. Stewart's Financial Advisor (page [    ] and Annex D)

        As financial advisor to W.P. Stewart's board of directors, on August 15, 2013, Duff & Phelps, LLC, referred to herein as Duff & Phelps, rendered its opinion to the W.P. Stewart board of directors that, subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limiting conditions set forth in its opinion, as of such date, the merger consideration was fair, from a financial point of view, to the stockholders of W.P. Stewart (without giving effect to any impact of the proposed merger on any particular stockholder other than in its capacity as a stockholder).

        The full text of the written opinion of Duff & Phelps, dated August 15, 2013, is attached hereto as Annex D and is incorporated herein by reference. The full text of the written opinion should be read carefully in its entirety for a description of the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and qualifications and limitations of the review undertaken in rendering the opinion. Duff & Phelps' opinion is not a recommendation as to how any W.P. Stewart stockholder should vote with respect to the proposed merger or act with respect to any other matter.


AllianceBernstein's Reasons for the Merger (page [    ])

        AllianceBernstein and its general partner have determined that the merger agreement and the merger are in the best interests of AllianceBernstein and its Unitholders (which we refer to as "Unitholders") and the board of directors of AllianceBernstein's general partner approved the merger agreement. Please see the section entitled "The Merger—AllianceBernstein's Reasons for the Merger" beginning on page [    ] of this proxy statement/prospectus for a full discussion of the factors that the board of directors of AllianceBernstein's general partner considered in reaching its decision to approve the merger.


Interests of W.P. Stewart's Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger (page [    ])

        In considering the recommendation of W.P. Stewart's board of directors that you vote to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger, you should be aware that some of W.P. Stewart's executive officers and directors may have economic interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, those of W.P. Stewart's stockholders generally. See "The Merger—Interests of W.P. Stewart's Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger" beginning on page [    ] of this proxy statement/prospectus.

        W.P. Stewart's board of directors was aware of and considered these interests, among other matters, in approving the merger agreement and the merger, and in making its recommendation that W.P. Stewart's stockholders vote to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger.

 


Table of Contents


Conditions to the Merger (page [    ])

        The obligations of the parties to effect the merger are subject to the fulfillment at or prior to the effective time of the merger of the following mutual conditions:

        The obligation of AllianceBernstein and Merger Sub to effect the merger is also subject to the fulfillment or waiver by AllianceBernstein, at or prior to the effective time of the merger, of the following additional conditions:

 


Table of Contents

        The obligation of W.P. Stewart to effect the merger is also subject to the fulfillment or waiver by W.P. Stewart, at or prior to the effective time of the merger, of the following additional conditions:


Termination of the Merger Agreement (page [    ])

        The merger agreement may be terminated and the merger may be abandoned (before or after the obtaining of the W.P. Stewart stockholder approval) by mutual written consent of AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart. In addition, the merger agreement may be terminated in the following circumstances:

 


Table of Contents


Termination Fee (page [    ])

        If the merger agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, including circumstances involving alternative acquisition proposals and changes in the recommendation of W.P. Stewart's board of directors, W.P. Stewart may be required to pay to AllianceBernstein a termination fee equal to $3.2 million plus certain documented out-of-pocket expenses in an amount not to exceed $800,000.


Voting Agreements (page [    ] and Annex E)

        In connection with their execution of the merger agreement, AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart entered into voting and support agreements and irrevocable proxies with certain stockholders of W.P. Stewart who are also themselves directors or affiliated with directors of W.P. Stewart (which we refer to collectively as the "voting agreements"). Pursuant to the voting agreements, each shareholder party to a voting agreement agreed to vote his or her shares of W.P. Stewart common stock in favor of approval of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby (including the merger) and against any agreement, transaction or proposal that relates to an acquisition proposal or alternative transaction unless the merger agreement is terminated. Each shareholder also agreed to grant AllianceBernstein and any designee of AllianceBernstein an irrevocable proxy, which would automatically terminate upon the termination of the voting agreement. In addition, pursuant to the voting agreements, each shareholder party to a voting agreement agreed to waive appraisal rights and agreed not to transfer or sell any such shares, subject to certain limited exceptions. The voting agreements will terminate upon the earlier of the effective time of the merger and the termination of the merger agreement in accordance with its terms. See "Certain Terms of the Merger Agreement—Voting Agreements" on page [    ].


William P. Stewart Voting Agreement (page [    ] and Annex F)

        In connection with their execution of the merger agreement, AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart also entered into a voting agreement with William P. Stewart (which we refer to as the "William P. Stewart voting agreement"). Pursuant to the William P. Stewart voting agreement, William P. Stewart has agreed to vote all shares of W.P. Stewart common stock of which he is the beneficial owner and has

 


Table of Contents

sole authority to vote in favor of the approval of the merger agreement and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. See "Certain Terms of the Merger Agreement—William P. Stewart Voting Agreement" on page [    ].


Employment Agreements (page [    ])

        Mark Phelps and James Tierney, current executive officers of W.P. Stewart, each entered into an employment agreement in connection with the execution of the merger agreement.

        The employment agreements with Mr. Phelps and Mr. Tierney are substantially the same, with certain variances due to Mr. Phelps being primarily located in London, England. The employment agreements provide for an annual base salary (£250,000 for Mr. Phelps and $375,000 for Mr. Tierney), minimum total cash compensation for 2014 of $700,000 (including any payments in 2014 from W.P. Stewart), participation in AllianceBernstein's year-end incentive compensation award program, and a one-time special award of restricted units representing assignments of beneficial ownership of limited partnership interests in AllianceBernstein Holding L.P., or Holding Units, with a value equal to $4,000,000 (determined in accordance with the process set forth in the employment agreement), which vest subject to continued employment through the fifth anniversary. In the event of a termination of employment by AllianceBernstein without Cause (as defined in the employment agreement) prior to the vesting date of the units, the terminated executive would be entitled to a lump sum severance payment equal to the grant date value of the Holding Units and, subject to the execution and non revocation of a release, continued base salary for 26 weeks following termination of the executive's employment (in addition to any applicable notice requirements for Mr. Phelps). Mr. Tierney's employment agreement also provides terms for the 2014 and 2015 bonus pools for W.P. Stewart's investment team. The employment agreement provides for a minimum total compensation pool of $8 million for W.P. Stewart's investment team in 2014 and a minimum total compensation pool of $7 million and a maximum total compensation pool of $11 million in 2015 (with the actual total compensation pool to be calculated based on a formula set by AllianceBernstein). The employment agreements also provide that each executive is subject to a covenant not to solicit employees or clients while they are employed and until (i) if the executive voluntarily terminates employment, the five year anniversary of the date the units are granted or (ii) if AllianceBernstein terminates the executive, for twelve months following the termination of employment. Each of Mr. Phelps and Mr. Tierney is currently expected to continue in his current role with W.P. Stewart as a portfolio manager following the merger.

        In addition, in connection with the execution of the merger agreement, W.P. Stewart entered into a letter agreement with William P. Stewart which provides for his separation from W.P. Stewart on the earlier of the closing of the merger and the end of the term of his existing employment agreement with W.P. Stewart on December 31, 2013. The separation agreement does not provide for any additional compensation to be paid to Mr. Stewart in connection with his separation from W.P. Stewart.


Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences (page [    ])

        The receipt of the merger consideration in exchange for W.P. Stewart shares will be a taxable transaction for United States federal income tax purposes. For more information regarding the United States federal income tax consequences of the merger, see the section entitled "The Merger—Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger" beginning on page [    ] of this proxy statement/prospectus.

        Tax matters are very complicated, and the tax consequences of the merger to a particular W.P. Stewart stockholder will depend in part on such stockholder's circumstances. Accordingly, you should consult your own tax advisor to determine the tax consequences of the merger to you, including the applicability and effect of United States federal, state, local and foreign income and other tax laws.

 


Table of Contents


Regulatory Filings and Approvals (page [    ])

        Under the HSR Act and related rules, certain transactions, including the merger, may not be completed until notifications have been given and information furnished to the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice (which we refer to as the "Antitrust Division") and the Federal Trade Commission (which we refer to as the "FTC") and all statutory waiting period requirements have been satisfied. On September 12, 2013, both AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart filed their respective notifications under the HSR Act with the Antitrust Division and the FTC. As a result, assuming the notifications are deemed complete,FTC, and the required waiting period will expireexpired on October 14, 2013, unless earlier terminated or extended by a request for additional information.15, 2013. The consummation of the merger isremains conditioned on the expiration or early termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act and the receipt of all other necessary regulatory approvals, which approvals must remain in full force and effect at the effective time of the merger. Certain additional filings may be made by AllianceBernstein or W.P. Stewart in connection with the merger, including in certain foreign jurisdictions.


Appraisal Rights (page [    ] and Annex C)

        Holders of W.P. Stewart common stock are entitled to appraisal rights under Delaware law. Under Delaware law, if the transaction is completed, a holder of W.P. Stewart common stock who did not vote in favor of approving and adopting the merger agreement will have the right to seek appraisal of the fair value of their shares as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, but only if they submit a written demand for an appraisal to W.P. Stewart before the vote on the approval and adoption of the merger agreement and they comply with Delaware law. See the section entitled "The Merger—Appraisal Rights of Dissenting W.P. Stewart Stockholders" beginning on page [    ] of this proxy statement/prospectus.

 


Table of Contents


ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN L.P.
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

        The following selected consolidated financial information for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 through December 31, 2012 is derived from audited financial statements of AllianceBernstein. The financial information as of and for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012 is derived from unaudited financial statements and, in the opinion of AllianceBernstein's management, reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of this data for those dates. The results of operations for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2013. You should not assume the results of operations for any past periods indicate results for any future period. You should read this information in conjunction with AllianceBernstein's consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in this proxy statement/prospectus.

 


Table of Contents


 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 Year Ended December 31,  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 Year Ended December 31, 

 2013 2012 2012 2011(1) 2010(1) 2009(1) 2008(1)  2013 2012 2012 2011(1) 2010(1) 2009(1) 2008(1) 

 (in thousands, except per unit amounts and unless otherwise indicated)
  (in thousands, except per unit amounts and unless otherwise indicated)
 

INCOME STATEMENT DATA:

  

Revenues:

  

Investment advisory and services fees

 $902,902 $849,423 $1,772,257 $1,916,419 $2,051,692 $1,920,332 $2,839,526  $1,352,152 $1,313,755 $1,772,257 $1,916,419 $2,051,692 $1,920,332 $2,839,526 

Bernstein research services

 224,456 209,351 413,707 437,414 430,521 434,605 471,716  331,811 309,988 413,707 437,414 430,521 434,605 471,716 

Distribution revenues

 239,520 188,097 401,706 351,621 338,597 277,328 378,425  353,488 293,702 401,706 351,621 338,597 277,328 378,425 

Dividend and interest income

 8,980 9,387 21,286 21,499 22,902 26,730 91,752  13,399 14,458 21,286 21,499 22,902 26,730 91,752 

Investment gains (losses)

 15,301 20,106 29,202 (82,081) (1,410) 144,447 (349,172) 21,761 27,316 29,202 (82,081) (1,410) 144,447 (349,172)

Other revenues

 53,755 49,129 101,801 107,569 109,803 107,848 118,436  79,027 75,283 101,801 107,569 109,803 107,848 118,436 
               

Total revenues

 1,444,914 1,325,493 2,739,959 2,752,441 2,952,105 2,911,290 3,550,683  2,151,638 2,034,502 2,739,959 2,752,441 2,952,105 2,911,290 3,550,683 

Less: interest expense

 1,517 1,521 3,222 2,550 3,548 4,411 36,524  2,163 2,372 3,222 2,550 3,548 4,411 36,524 
               

Net revenues

 1,443,397 1,323,972 2,736,737 2,749,891 2,948,557 2,906,879 3,514,159  2,149,475 2,032,130 2,736,737 2,749,891 2,948,557 2,906,879 3,514,159 
               

Expenses:

  

Employee compensation and benefits:

  

Employee compensation and
benefits

 607,722 575,364 1,168,645 1,246,898 1,320,495 1,296,386 1,452,017  910,248 876,233 1,168,645 1,246,898 1,320,495 1,296,386 1,452,017 

Long-term incentive compensation charge

    587,131        587,131    

Promotion and servicing:

  

Distribution-related payments

 220,666 165,989 367,090 302,684 286,676 234,203 307,890  322,034 260,768 367,090 302,684 286,676 234,203 307,890 

Amortization of deferred sales commissions

 21,399 18,438 40,262 37,675 47,397 54,922 79,111  31,762 29,096 40,262 37,675 47,397 54,922 79,111 

Other

 107,324 101,509 202,191 219,197 193,822 178,070 202,749  155,464 149,023 202,191 219,197 193,822 178,070 202,749 

General and administrative:

  

General and administrative

 209,750 254,220 508,364 533,578 516,185 520,372 513,098  314,520 389,949 508,364 533,578 516,185 520,372 513,098 

Real estate charges

 2,573 16,056 223,038 7,235 101,698 8,276   26,698 184,142 223,038 7,235 101,698 8,276  

Interest on borrowings

 1,776 1,725 3,429 2,545 2,078 2,696 13,077  2,388 2,602 3,429 2,545 2,078 2,696 13,077 

Amortization of intangible assets

 11,335 10,679 21,353 21,417 21,344 21,126 20,716  16,891 16,146 21,353 21,417 21,344 21,126 20,716 
               

Total expenses

 1,182,545 1,143,980 2,534,372 2,958,360 2,489,695 2,316,051 2,588,658  1,780,005 1,907,959 2,534,372 2,958,360 2,489,695 2,316,051 2,588,658 
               

Operating income (loss)

 260,852 179,992 202,365 (208,469) 458,862 590,828 925,501  369,470 124,171 202,365 (208,469) 458,862 590,828 925,501 

Non-operating income

     6,760 33,657 18,728      6,760 33,657 18,728 
               

Income (loss) before income taxes

 260,852 179,992 202,365 (208,469) 465,622 624,485 944,229  369,470 124,171 202,365 (208,469) 465,622 624,485 944,229 

Income taxes

 20,731 12,541 13,764 3,098 38,523 45,977 95,803  27,988 4,969 13,764 3,098 38,523 45,977 95,803 
               

Net income (loss)

 240,121 167,451 188,601 (211,567) 427,099 578,508 848,426  341,482 119,202 188,601 (211,567) 427,099 578,508 848,426 

Net income (loss) of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests

 4,891 5,988 (315) (36,799) (15,320) 22,381 9,186  6,304 1,985 (315) (36,799) (15,320) 22,381 9,186 
               

Net income (loss) attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $235,230 $161,463 $188,916 $(174,768)$442,419 $556,127 $839,240  $335,178 $117,217 $188,916 $(174,768)$442,419 $556,127 $839,240 
               

Basic net income (loss) per AllianceBernstein Unit

 $0.84 $0.58 $0.67 (0.62)$1.59 $2.07 $3.18  $1.21 $0.42 $0.67 $(0.62)$1.59 $2.07 $3.18 
               

Diluted net income (loss) per AllianceBernstein Unit

 $0.83 $0.58 $0.67 (0.62)$1.58 $2.07 $3.18  $1.21 $0.42 $0.67 $(0.62)$1.58 $2.07 $3.18 
               

Operating margin(2)

 17.7% 13.1% 7.4% n/m 16.1% 19.6% 26.1% 16.9% 6.0% 7.4% n/m 16.1% 19.6% 26.1%
                              

CASH DISTRIBUTIONS PER ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN UNIT(3)(4)(5)

 $0.85 $0.57 $1.36 $1.38 $1.58 $2.06 $3.07  $1.31 $0.98 $1.36 $1.38 $1.58 $2.06 $3.07 

BALANCE SHEET DATA AT PERIOD END:

  

Total assets

 $7,301,817 $7,527,805 $8,115,050 $7,708,389 $7,580,315 $7,214,940 $8,503,459  $7,193,692 $7,316,156 $8,115,050 $7,708,389 $7,580,315 $7,214,940 $8,503,459 

Debt

 $346,265 $275,930 $323,163 $444,903 $224,991 $248,987 $284,779  $163,000 $241,337 $323,163 $444,903 $224,991 $248,987 $284,779 

Total Capital

 $3,933,047 $4,098,766 $3,803,268 $4,029,487 $4,495,356 $4,701,955 $4,486,826  $3,914,097 $3,950,628 $3,803,268 $4,029,487 $4,495,356 $4,701,955 $4,486,826 

ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT AT PERIOD END (unaudited) (in millions)

 $434,605 $407,270 $430,017 $405,897 $478,019 $486,683 $448,808  $445,226 $418,860 $430,017 $405,897 $478,019 $486,683 $448,808 

(1)
Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform to our 2012 presentation.

(2)
Operating income excluding net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests as a percentage of net revenues.

(3)
AllianceBernstein is required to distribute all of its Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement, to its Unitholders and the General Partner.

(4)
The 2012 distribution excludes a total of $207.0 million of non-cash real estate charges recorded in the third and fourth quarters of 2012.

(5)
The 2011 distribution excludes the $587.1 million one-time, non-cash long-term incentive compensation charge.

 


Table of Contents


COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA
(Unaudited)

        Presented below for AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart is historical, unaudited pro forma combined financial data as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 and as of and for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013. The information presented below should be read together with the historical consolidated financial statements of AllianceBernstein, including the related notes, filed by AllianceBernstein with the SEC and included in this proxy statement/prospectus.

        The unaudited pro forma combined information gives effect to the merger as if the merger had been effective on December 31, 2012 or JuneSeptember 30, 2013 in the case of the book value data, and as if the merger had been effective as of January 1, 2012 in the case of the earnings per share and the cash dividends data. The unaudited pro forma data combines the historical results of W.P. Stewart into AllianceBernstein's consolidated statement of income. While certain adjustments were made for the estimated impact of fair value adjustments and other acquisition-related activity, they are not indicative of what could have occurred had the acquisition taken place on January 1, 2012.

        The unaudited pro forma adjustments are based upon available information and certain assumptions that AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart management believe are reasonable. The unaudited pro forma data, while helpful in illustrating the financial characteristics of the combined company under one set of assumptions, does not reflect the impact of factors that may result as a consequence of the merger or consider any potential impacts of current market conditions or the merger on revenues, expense efficiencies, asset dispositions, among other factors, nor the impact of possible business model changes. As a result, unaudited pro forma data is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent an attempt to predict or suggest future results. Upon completion of the merger, the operating results of W.P. Stewart will be reflected in the consolidated financial statements of AllianceBernstein on a prospective basis.


 AllianceBernstein
Historical
 W.P. Stewart
Historical
 Pro Forma
Combined
  AllianceBernstein
Historical
 W.P. Stewart
Historical
 Pro Forma
Combined
 

For the year ended December 31, 2012:

  

Basic earnings per share

 $0.67 $0.45 $0.68  $0.67 $0.45 $0.68 

Diluted earnings per share

 $0.67 $0.43 $0.68  $0.67 $0.43 $0.68 

Cash dividends declared

 $1.36 $ $1.37  $1.36 $ $1.37 

Book value per share as of December 31, 2012

 $13.56 $4.73 $13.56  $13.56 $4.73 $13.56 

For the six months ended June 30, 2013:

 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013:

 

Basic earnings (loss) per share

 $0.84 $(0.07)$0.84  $1.21 $(0.24)$1.21 

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

 $0.83 $(0.07)$0.83  $1.21 $(0.24)$1.21 

Cash dividends declared

 $0.85 $ $0.85  $1.31 $ $1.31 

Book value per share as of June 30, 2013

 $13.99 $4.62 $13.99 

Book value per share as of September 30, 2013

 $14.65 $4.39 $14.65 

 


Table of Contents


RISK FACTORS

        If the merger is completed, AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart will operate as a combined company in a market environment that is difficult to predict and that involves significant risks, many of which will be beyond the combined company's control. You should carefully consider the risks described below before voting your shares. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart or that they do not currently believe are important to an investor, if they materialize, also may adversely affect the merger, AllianceBernstein, W.P. Stewart and the combined company. A discussion of additional risks and uncertainties regarding AllianceBernstein can be found in the documents filed by AllianceBernstein with the SEC. See "Where You Can Find More Information" beginning on page [        ] of this proxy statement/prospectus. If any of the events, contingencies, circumstances or conditions described in the following risks actually occur, AllianceBernstein's and W.P. Stewart's respective businesses, financial condition or their results of operations (both separately and as combined) could be seriously harmed.


Risks Related to the Merger and the CVRs

You may not receive any payment on the CVRs.

        As described in more detail in the section entitled "Description of the CVRs" beginning on page [        ] of this proxy statement/prospectus, the CVR agreement sets forth the rights of the W.P. Stewart stockholders to receive payments under the CVRs. The nature of rights under the CVR agreement and the CVRs is contractual, and the CVR holders have no rights except for those expressly set forth in the CVR agreement.

        The events that result in contingent payments may not occur due to numerous factors. Among other things:

        Accordingly, the value, if any, of the CVRs is speculative, and the CVRs may ultimately have no value.

You will not be able to immediately determine the amount of cash to be received under the CVRs, which makes it difficult to value the CVRs.

        If any payment is made on the CVRs, it will not be made until the achievement of the AUM milestone. Because the amount of any payment on the CVRs will not be able to be determined at the effective time of the merger, and may not be determined for a significant period of time thereafter, it may be difficult to value the CVRs, and accordingly, it may be difficult or impossible for you to resell or transfer your CVRs.

Regulatory agencies must approve the merger and could impose conditions that could affect the value of the CVRs you receive in the merger.

        AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart intend to comply with antitrust laws and other laws and regulations of the United States and any other jurisdiction in which the merger may be subject to review. The reviewing authorities may impose conditions on AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart as a condition to giving their approval or consent to the merger. AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart have agreed to use reasonable best efforts to obtain the required regulatory approvals. The value of the CVRs depends on the achievement of the AUM milestone. Conditions imposed by regulatory


Table of Contents

authorities could reduce the scope or otherwise harm the operation of the AllianceBernstein business following the merger, which could adversely affect AllianceBernstein's ability to meet such milestone, which in turn could result in no payment being made on the CVRs.

Any payments in respect of the CVRs rank at parity with AllianceBernstein's other indebtedness, other than secured or senior obligations.

        The CVRs will rank equal in right of payment to all existing and future unsecured unsubordinated indebtedness of AllianceBernstein, and senior in right of payment to all subordinated indebtedness of AllianceBernstein. The CVRs, however, will be effectively subordinated in right of payment to all of AllianceBernstein's secured obligations to the extent of the collateral securing such obligations and to any senior obligations of AllianceBernstein.

An active public market for the CVRs is unlikely to develop, or the CVRs will likely trade at low volumes, both of which could have an adverse effect on the resale price, if any, of the CVRs.

        The CVRs are a new security for which there is currently no public trading market. An active public trading market for the securities may not develop or be sustained.

        Even if an active public trading market develops, there may be little or no market demand for the CVRs, making it difficult or impossible to resell the CVRs, which would have an adverse effect on the resale price, if any, of the CVRs. In addition, holders of CVRs may incur brokerage charges in connection with the resale of the CVRs, which in some cases could exceed the proceeds realized by the holder from the resale of its CVRs. Neither AllianceBernstein nor W.P. Stewart can predict the price, if any, at which the CVRs will trade following the closing of the transaction.

AllianceBernstein may repurchase the CVRs.

        The CVR agreement does not prohibit AllianceBernstein from acquiring the CVRs, whether in open market transactions, private transactions or otherwise. Such acquisitions by AllianceBernstein may prevent the development of an active public trading market for the remaining CVRs or reduce the liquidity of the remaining CVRs, which would have an adverse effect on the resale price, if any, of the remaining CVRs.

Because it is unlikely that an active public market for the CVRs will develop, the market price and trading volume of the CVRs may be volatile.

        Neither AllianceBernstein nor W.P. Stewart can predict the extent to which investor interest will lead to a liquid trading market in the CVRs or whether the market price of the CVRs will be volatile following the merger. The market price of the CVRs could fluctuate significantly for many reasons, including, without limitation:


Table of Contents

AllianceBernstein's requirement to achieve the CVR payment-triggering milestone is based on "diligent efforts," which allows for consideration of a variety of factors to determine the efforts AllianceBernstein is required to take; accordingly, under certain circumstances AllianceBernstein may not be required to take certain actions to achieve the CVR payment-triggering milestone, or may allocate resources to other projects, which may have an adverse effect on the value, if any, of the CVRs.

        AllianceBernstein has agreed to use diligent efforts, until the CVR agreement is terminated, to achieve the AUM milestone. In addition, AllianceBernstein has agreed to engage in certain specified conduct, the undertaking of which creates a presumption that AllianceBernstein has used diligent efforts to achieve such milestone. See "Description of the CVRs" beginning on page [        ]. However, although AllianceBernstein is required to engage in certain specified conduct under the CVR agreement, the CVR agreement's definition of diligent efforts does not require AllianceBernstein to incur a financial detriment in excess of what is, or spend in excess of what is, reasonable in relation to the benefit obtained by the exertion of such effort, and does not require AllianceBernstein to take all possible actions to achieve the milestone.

The United States federal income tax treatment of the receipt of CVRs in the merger is unclear.

        There is no legal authority directly addressing the United States federal income tax treatment of the CVRs. Accordingly, the amount, timing and character of any gain, income or loss with respect to the CVRs are uncertain. For example, it is possible that payments received with respect to a CVR, up to the amount of the holder's adjusted tax basis in the CVR, may be treated as a non-taxable return of a holder's adjusted tax basis in the CVR, with any amount received in excess of such basis treated as gain from the disposition of the CVR, or possibly another method of basis recovery may apply. Further, it is not clear whether payments made with respect to a CVR may be treated as payments with respect to a sale or exchange of a capital asset or as giving rise to ordinary income. A holder who does not sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of a CVR may not be able to recognize a loss with respect to the CVR until the holder's right to receive CVR payments terminates. Although not entirely clear, a portion of any payment with respect to a CVR that is due more than six months following the consummation of the merger may constitute imputed interest taxable as ordinary income under Section 483 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (which we refer to as the "Code"), and AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart have agreed to determine imputed interest, if any, in accordance with Section 483 of the Code. See "The Merger—Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger" beginning on page [        ] of this proxy statement/prospectus for a more detailed discussion of the United States federal income tax treatment of the CVRs.

The merger is subject to closing conditions that could result in the completion of the merger being delayed or not consummated, which could negatively impact W.P. Stewart's stock price or AllianceBernstein's or W.P. Stewart's future business and operations and financial condition.

        Completion of the merger is conditioned upon AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart satisfying closing conditions, including adoption of the merger agreement by W.P. Stewart's stockholders, all as set forth in the merger agreement. See the section entitled "Certain Terms of the Merger Agreement—Conditions to the Merger" beginning on page [        ] for a discussion of the conditions to the completion of the merger. The required conditions to closing may not be satisfied in a timely manner, if at all, and the merger may not be consummated. Failure to consummate the merger could negatively impact W.P. Stewart's stock price or AllianceBernstein's or W.P. Stewart's future business and operations, and financial condition. Any delay in the consummation of the merger or any uncertainty about the consummation of the merger may adversely affect the future business, growth, revenue and results of operations of either or both of the companies.


Table of Contents

        If the merger is not completed for any reason, the ongoing business of AllianceBernstein or W.P. Stewart may be adversely affected and will be subject to a number of risks, including:

        If the merger agreement is terminated and W.P. Stewart's board of directors seeks another merger or business combination, W.P. Stewart stockholders cannot be certain that W.P. Stewart will be able to find a party willing to pay a price equivalent to or more attractive than the price AllianceBernstein has agreed to pay in the merger.

W.P. Stewart's executive officers and directors have interests different from your interests that may influence them to support or approve the merger.

        In considering the recommendation of the W.P. Stewart board of directors to adopt the merger agreement, W.P. Stewart stockholders should recognize that W.P. Stewart's executive officers and directors have interests that differ from those of W.P. Stewart's stockholders because of employment arrangements, indemnification and liability insurance and other reasons. These reasons are described in the section entitled "The Merger—Interests of W.P. Stewart's Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger."

W.P. Stewart will be subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the merger is pending.

        Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on employees and customers may have an adverse effect on W.P. Stewart. These uncertainties may impair W.P. Stewart's ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the merger is completed, and could cause customers and others that deal with W.P. Stewart to seek to change existing business relationships with W.P. Stewart. Retention of certain employees by W.P. Stewart may be challenging while the merger is pending, as certain employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with the combined company. If key employees depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with the combined company, AllianceBernstein's or W.P. Stewart's business could be harmed. In addition, subject to certain exceptions, W.P. Stewart has agreed to operate its business in the regular and ordinary course prior to closing and not to take certain specified actions. See "Certain Terms of the Merger Agreement—Conduct of Business Pending the Merger" for a description of the restrictive covenants applicable to W.P. Stewart.


Table of Contents

The merger agreement limits W.P. Stewart's ability to pursue alternatives to the merger.

        Until the effective time of the merger or, if earlier, the termination of the merger agreement, W.P. Stewart has agreed that it will not, and will not authorize or knowingly permit any of its subsidiaries or any of its or their representatives to, directly or indirectly:

        Under the terms of the merger agreement, W.P. Stewart has agreed to immediately cease and cause to be terminated any discussions with any party that relate to any acquisition proposal.

        Under certain circumstances, the merger agreement also provides that W.P. Stewart will be required to pay to AllianceBernstein a termination fee of $3,200,000 plus certain documented out-of-pocket expenses not to exceed $800,000. These provisions might discourage a potential competing acquirer that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of W.P. Stewart from considering or proposing an acquisition even if it were prepared to pay consideration with a higher value than that proposed in the merger, or might result in a potential competing acquirer proposing to pay consideration with a lower value to acquire W.P. Stewart than it might otherwise propose to pay.

Uncertainties associated with the merger may cause AllianceBernstein or W.P. Stewart to lose clients.

        In response to the announcement of the merger, AllianceBernstein's or W.P. Stewart's clients may determine to withdraw assets currently under management because of uncertainties associated with the merger or for any other reason, which could have an adverse effect on AllianceBernstein, W.P. Stewart, or the combined company following the merger.


Risks Related to AllianceBernstein

AllianceBernstein's ability to retain clients and increase AllianceBernstein's assets under management, or AUM, depends, in part, on AllianceBernstein's absolute and relative investment performance. Some of AllianceBernstein's core equity services continued to underperform during 2012. Poor investment performance may lead to an additional loss of clients and a decline in AUM and revenues, and could lead to further downgrades in AllianceBernstein's credit ratings and a reduced ability to access credit on reasonable terms.

        AllianceBernstein's ability to achieve investment returns for clients that meet or exceed investment returns for comparable asset classes and competing investment services is a key consideration when clients decide to keep their assets with AllianceBernstein or invest additional assets, and when a prospective client is deciding whether to invest with AllianceBernstein. Poor investment performance in some of AllianceBernstein's services, both in absolute terms and/or relative to peers and stated benchmarks, has resulted, and may continue to result, in clients withdrawing assets and in prospective clients choosing to invest with competitors. The resulting lower AUM levels have led, and may continue to lead, to lower investment management fees, including minimal or no performance-based fees; lower investment management fees have resulted, and may continue to result, in revenue declines.


Table of Contents

        Since the financial crisis of 2008, AllianceBernstein has underperformed benchmarks in many of AllianceBernstein's services, particularly some of AllianceBernstein's core equities services. Throughout 2012, and particularly during the second quarter, numerous sources of uncertainty negatively affected the global economy, which hindered investor confidence and hampered the ability of most asset managers, including AllianceBernstein, to produce returns that met client expectations. AllianceBernstein's underperformance in certain of AllianceBernstein's core equities services during 2012 may place continued pressure on AllianceBernstein's flows during 2013 in AllianceBernstein's Institutions and Private Client channels.

        In addition, AllianceBernstein's continued underperformance in certain of AllianceBernstein's core equities services may affect AllianceBernstein's credit ratings. AllianceBernstein's access to credit on reasonable terms is partially dependent on AllianceBernstein's credit ratings. Moody's Investors Service, Inc., or Moody's, affirmed AllianceBernstein's long-term senior debt rating during 2012 while Standard & Poor's Ratings Service, or S&P, downgraded the AllianceBernstein's long-term rating from AA- to A+ in June 2012. Each rating agency maintains a "negative" outlook primarily due to concerns over continued outflows and weak investment performance in large cap equities. S&P, in its June 2012 press release, cited factors that could result in a future downgrade of AllianceBernstein's long-term rating, including continued net outflows as a result of lagging investment performance in equities, particularly if the outflows lead to a less favorable asset mix and a deterioration of the AllianceBernstein's AUM and profitability. Moody's, in its latest ratings analysis, also cited factors that could result in a downgrade to AllianceBernstein's long-term rating, including material net outflows for several quarters, a decline in average AUM to below $375 billion and a leverage ratio (debt/EBITDA) greater than 1.5. A downgrade to AllianceBernstein's credit ratings is likely to increase AllianceBernstein's borrowing costs and limit AllianceBernstein's access to the capital markets. For more information on the underperformance of certain of AllianceBernstein's core equities services, see the table on page [            ] of this proxy statement/prospectus in the section entitled "The Companies—AllianceBernstein—Management's Discussion and Analysis—SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 Compared to SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2012—Assets Under Management" and the table on page [            ] of this proxy statement/prospectus in the section entitled "The Companies—AllianceBernstein—Management's Discussion and Analysis—Year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011—Assets Under Management".

Volatility in and disruption of the global capital and credit markets and adverse changes in the global economy are likely to significantly affect AllianceBernstein's AUM; any significant reduction in AllianceBernstein's AUM can have a material adverse effect on AllianceBernstein's results of operations and business prospects.

        The mix, market value and level of AllianceBernstein's AUM are affected by the performance of financial markets (both domestic and international), global economic conditions, industry trends, interest rates, inflation rates, tax regulation changes and other factors that are difficult to predict. Investment advisory and services fees, the largest component of AllianceBernstein's revenues, are generally calculated as a percentage of the value of AUM and vary with the type of account managed. Accordingly, fee income generally increases or decreases as AUM increase or decrease and is affected by market appreciation or depreciation, inflow of new client assets (including purchases of mutual fund shares) and outflow of client assets (including redemption of mutual fund shares). In addition, changing market conditions and investment trends, particularly with respect to retirement savings, may reduce interest in certain of AllianceBernstein's investment products and may result in a reduction in AUM.

        Throughout 2012, and particularly during the second quarter, the capital and credit markets continued to experience volatility and disruption worldwide as concerns over European sovereign debt and the effect of the U.S. fiscal cliff (which, during the first quarter of 2013, has shifted to concerns regarding the debt ceiling debate), and signs of slowing growth in emerging markets, particularly China,


Table of Contents

created market volatility that negatively affected investment performance. These conditions, combined with net outflows in AllianceBernstein's Institutions and Private Client channels, resulted in significant decreases in AllianceBernstein's investment advisory and services fees. Future disruption of the capital and credit markets could result in further net outflows, which could severely impact AllianceBernstein's results of operations and financial condition. If AllianceBernstein is unable to obtain funds and/or financing, AllianceBernstein may be forced to incur unanticipated costs or revise its strategic plans, which could have a material adverse effect on AllianceBernstein's financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.

The amount and mix of AllianceBernstein's AUM are subject to significant fluctuations, which may adversely affect AllianceBernstein's fee levels and results of operations; AllianceBernstein's fee levels also could be negatively affected by regulatory initiatives, court decisions and competitive considerations, which may adversely affect AllianceBernstein's results of operations.

        Fluctuations in the amount and mix of AllianceBernstein's AUM may be attributable in part to conditions outside of AllianceBernstein's control that have had, and in the future may have, a negative effect on AllianceBernstein's revenues and income. AllianceBernstein derives substantially all of its revenues and income from providing investment research and management and related services, so a decrease in the level of AllianceBernstein's AUM, whether resulting from poor investment performance, client outflows or other factors, adversely affects AllianceBernstein's revenues and income.

        During the past several years, there has been a shift from active equity services towards fixed income services and passive services, which has resulted, and may continue to result, in a corresponding decline in AllianceBernstein's revenues and income because AllianceBernstein generally earns higher fees from assets invested in AllianceBernstein's active equity services than in AllianceBernstein's fixed income services or passive services. A shift from global and international services to U.S. services is likely to have a similar effect. For example, the global economic turmoil experienced during the second quarter of 2012 caused some investors to further shift their investment preferences from active equities to fixed income, passive and money market products (some of which AllianceBernstein does not offer). This trend may continue or accelerate in the future.

        Conversely, increases in interest rates, particularly if rapid, or high interest rates, as well as uncertainty pertaining to the future direction of interest rates, would be likely to decrease the total return of many bond investments due to lower market valuations of existing bonds. These factors, combined with a potential shift in investor sentiment away from fixed income investments, could have a significant adverse effect on AllianceBernstein's revenues and results of operations because, in recent years, AllianceBernstein's AUM in fixed income investments have become a larger component of AllianceBernstein's overall AUM.

        In addition, AllianceBernstein may be required to reduce its fee levels, restructure the fees AllianceBernstein charges or adjust the services AllianceBernstein offers to its clients because of, among other things, regulatory initiatives (whether industry-wide or specifically targeted), court decisions and competitive considerations. A reduction in fees would reduce AllianceBernstein's revenues. A reduction in revenues, without a commensurate reduction in expenses, will adversely affect AllianceBernstein's results of operations.

AllianceBernstein's results of operations and reputation could continue to suffer if AllianceBernstein is unable to deliver consistent, competitive investment performance.

        AllianceBernstein's business is based on the trust and confidence of its clients, and AllianceBernstein is dedicated to earning and maintaining this trust and confidence. Damage to


Table of Contents

AllianceBernstein's reputation can substantially reduce AllianceBernstein's AUM and impair AllianceBernstein's ability to maintain or grow its business.

        AllianceBernstein's continued underperformance over the last few years in certain of AllianceBernstein's core equities services damaged AllianceBernstein's reputation among many clients, prospects and consultants. AllianceBernstein is focused on delivering consistent, competitive investment performance in 2013 and, in so doing, continuing to rebuild AllianceBernstein's reputation. Failure in this endeavor, however, could have a material adverse effect on AllianceBernstein's reputation, results of operations and business prospects.

Maintaining adequate liquidity for AllianceBernstein's general business needs depends on certain factors, including operating cash flows and AllianceBernstein's access to credit on reasonable terms.

        AllianceBernstein's financial condition is dependent on its cash flow from operations, which is subject to the performance of the capital markets, AllianceBernstein's ability to maintain and grow AUM and other factors beyond AllianceBernstein's control. AllianceBernstein's ability to issue public or private debt on reasonable terms may be limited by adverse market conditions, AllianceBernstein's profitability, AllianceBernstein's creditworthiness as perceived by lenders and changes in government regulations, including tax rates and interest rates. Furthermore, AllianceBernstein's access to credit on reasonable terms is partially dependent on AllianceBernstein's credit ratings. A downgrade to AllianceBernstein's credit ratings is likely to increase AllianceBernstein's borrowing costs and limit AllianceBernstein's access to the capital markets. If AllianceBernstein is unable to obtain funds and/or financing, AllianceBernstein may be forced to incur unanticipated costs or revise its strategic plans, which could have a material adverse effect on AllianceBernstein's financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.

An impairment of goodwill may occur.

        As a result of increased economic uncertainty and current market dynamics, determining whether an impairment of the goodwill asset exists requires management to exercise significant judgment. In addition, to the extent that securities valuations are depressed for prolonged periods of time and market conditions worsen, or if AllianceBernstein experiences significant net redemptions, AllianceBernstein's AUM, revenues, profitability and unit price may be adversely affected. Although the price of a Holding Unit is just one factor in the calculation of fair value, if current Holding Unit price levels decline significantly, reaching the conclusion that fair value exceeds carrying value will, over time, become more difficult. In addition, control premiums, industry earnings multiples and discount rates are impacted by economic conditions. As a result, subsequent impairment tests may occur more frequently and be based on more negative assumptions and future cash flow projections, and may result in an impairment of goodwill. An impairment may result in a material charge to AllianceBernstein's earnings.

AllianceBernstein's business is dependent on investment advisory, selling and distribution agreements that are subject to termination or non-renewal on short notice.

        AllianceBernstein derives most of its revenues pursuant to written investment management agreements (or other arrangements) with institutional investors, mutual funds and private clients, and selling and distribution agreements between AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc., an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein that services retail clients and distributes company-sponsored mutual funds, and financial intermediaries that distribute AllianceBernstein funds. Generally, the investment management agreements (and other arrangements) are terminable at any time or upon relatively short notice by either party. The selling and distribution agreements are terminable by either party upon notice (generally 30 days) and do not obligate the financial intermediary to sell any specific amount of fund shares. In addition, investors in AllianceBernstein funds can redeem their investments without notice. Any termination of, or failure to renew, a significant number of these agreements, or a


Table of Contents

significant increase in redemption rates, could have a material adverse effect on AllianceBernstein's results of operations and business prospects.

        Furthermore, the investment management agreements pursuant to which AllianceBernstein manages the U.S. funds must be renewed and approved by the funds' boards of directors annually. Significantly more than a majority of the directors are independent. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the board of directors of each fund will approve the fund's investment management agreement each year, or will not condition its approval on revised terms that may be adverse to AllianceBernstein.

AllianceBernstein's ability to establish new client relationships and maintain existing ones is partly dependent on AllianceBernstein's relationships with various financial intermediaries and consultants that are not obligated to continue to work with AllianceBernstein.

        AllianceBernstein's ability to market its retail products and services, sub-advisory services and certain other investment services is partly dependent on AllianceBernstein's access to securities firms, brokers, banks and other intermediaries. These intermediaries generally offer their clients investment products that compete with AllianceBernstein's products. In addition, certain institutional investors rely on consultants to advise them on choosing an investment adviser, and currently, some of AllianceBernstein's core equities services are not considered among the best choices by consultants. For example, in previous years a number of investment consultants advised their clients to move their assets invested with AllianceBernstein to other investment advisers, which contributed to significant net outflows. This trend may continue. Also, AllianceBernstein's private client services group relies on referrals from financial planners, registered investment advisers and other professionals. AllianceBernstein cannot be certain that it will continue to have access to, or receive referrals from, these third parties. Loss of such access or referrals could have a material adverse effect on AllianceBernstein's results of operations and business prospects.

AllianceBernstein may be unable to continue to attract, motivate and retain key personnel, and the cost to retain key personnel could put pressure on AllianceBernstein's operating margin.

        AllianceBernstein's business depends on its ability to attract, motivate and retain highly skilled, and often highly specialized, technical, managerial and executive personnel; there can be no assurance that AllianceBernstein will be able to do so.

        The market for qualified research analysts, portfolio managers, financial advisors, traders and other professionals is extremely competitive and is characterized by frequent movement of these investment professionals among different firms. In 2012, some of AllianceBernstein's senior professionals left the firm; additional departures may occur. Portfolio managers and financial advisors often maintain strong, personal relationships with their clients so their departure has caused, and may continue to cause, AllianceBernstein to lose client accounts, which could have a material adverse effect on AllianceBernstein's results of operations and business prospects.

        If AllianceBernstein's revenues continue to decline during 2013, it will place significant added pressure on AllianceBernstein's ability to pay its employees at competitive levels. As a result, AllianceBernstein will continue to be vigilant about scaling AllianceBernstein's cost structure (including headcount) to AllianceBernstein's revenue base. See "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" below.

        AllianceBernstein's operating margin may decline if it increases compensation to retain key personnel without a commensurate increase in revenues.

Performance-based fee arrangements with AllianceBernstein's clients cause greater fluctuations in AllianceBernstein's revenues.

        AllianceBernstein sometimes charges its clients performance-based fees for certain services. For these services, AllianceBernstein charges a base advisory fee and is eligible to earn an additional


Table of Contents

performance-based fee or incentive allocation that is calculated as either a percentage of absolute investment results or a percentage of investment results in excess of a stated benchmark over a specified period of time. Some performance-based fees include a high-watermark provision, which generally provides that if a client account underperforms relative to its performance target (whether absolute or relative to a specified benchmark), it must gain back such underperformance before AllianceBernstein can collect future performance-based fees. Therefore, if AllianceBernstein fails to achieve the performance target for a particular period, AllianceBernstein will not earn a performance-based fee for that period and, for accounts with a high-watermark provision, AllianceBernstein's ability to earn future performance-based fees will be impaired.

        AllianceBernstein is eligible to earn performance-based fees on approximately 8% of the assets AllianceBernstein manages for institutional clients and approximately 3% of the assets AllianceBernstein manages for private clients (in total, approximately 4% of AllianceBernstein's company-wide AUM). If the percentage of AllianceBernstein's AUM subject to performance-based fees grows, seasonality and volatility of revenue and earnings are likely to become more significant. AllianceBernstein's performance-based fees in 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $66.6 million (including $39.6 million pertaining to winding up the PPIP fund), $16.5 million and $20.5 million, respectively.

AllianceBernstein may engage in strategic transactions that could pose risks.

        As part of AllianceBernstein's business strategy, AllianceBernstein considers potential strategic transactions, including acquisitions, dispositions, consolidations, joint ventures and similar transactions, some of which may be material. These transactions, if undertaken, may involve a number of risks and present financial, managerial and operational challenges, including:

        Acquisitions also pose the risk that any business AllianceBernstein acquires may lose customers or employees or could underperform relative to expectations. Acquisitions also present significant risks as to the ability of AllianceBernstein to integrate the acquired business with AllianceBernstein's operations. Additionally, the acquisition of investment personnel poses the risk that AllianceBernstein may lose the AUM AllianceBernstein expected to manage, which could adversely affect AllianceBernstein's results of operations. Furthermore, strategic transactions may require AllianceBernstein to increase its leverage or, if AllianceBernstein issues AllianceBernstein limited partnership units, would dilute the holdings of AllianceBernstein existing Unitholders. These risks are inherent in AllianceBernstein's acquisition of W.P. Stewart. There can be no assurance that AllianceBernstein will manage successfully these risks.

Because many of AllianceBernstein's subsidiary operations are located outside of the United States and have functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar, changes in exchange rates to the U.S. dollar affect AllianceBernstein's reported financial results from one period to the next.

        Although significant portions of AllianceBernstein's net revenues and expenses, as well as AllianceBernstein's AUM, are presently derived from the United States, AllianceBernstein has subsidiaries outside of the United States with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar. As a result, fluctuations in exchange rates to the U.S. dollar affect AllianceBernstein's reported financial results from one period to the next. AllianceBernstein may not be successful in its efforts to hedge AllianceBernstein's exposure to such fluctuations, which could have a negative effect on AllianceBernstein's reported financial results.


Table of Contents

Despite AllianceBernstein's efforts to manage exposures from principal positions taken by AllianceBernstein sell-side business, these positions are subject to market risk.

        Bernstein Research Services may use the AllianceBernstein's capital to facilitate customer transactions, primarily relating to trading activities in listed options. The resulting principal positions are exposed to market risk. AllianceBernstein seeks to manage this risk both by engaging in transactions designed to hedge the market risk and by maintaining a risk platform that includes the measurement and monitoring of financial exposures and operational processes. AllianceBernstein's ability to manage this risk may be limited, however, by adverse changes in the liquidity of the security or the hedging instrument and in the correlation of price movements between the security and the hedging instrument. Similarly, the risk monitoring and risk mitigation techniques AllianceBernstein employs and the related judgments AllianceBernstein makes cannot anticipate every possible economic and financial circumstance and outcome. Consequently, AllianceBernstein may incur losses, which would require AllianceBernstein to increase its regulatory capital and could adversely affect AllianceBernstein's results of operations.

AllianceBernstein's seed capital investments are subject to market risk. While AllianceBernstein enters into various futures, forward and swap contracts to economically hedge certain of these investments, AllianceBernstein also may be exposed to market risk and credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to these derivative instruments.

        AllianceBernstein has a seed investment program for the purpose of sponsoring new products. As AllianceBernstein's new product launches have increased in recent years, so too has AllianceBernstein's use of seed capital for investment purposes. These seed capital investments are subject to market risk. AllianceBernstein's risk management team oversees a seed hedging program that attempts to minimize this risk, subject to practical and cost considerations. Also, not all seed investments are deemed appropriate to hedge, and in those cases AllianceBernstein is exposed to market risk. As a result, volatility in the capital markets may cause significant changes in AllianceBernstein's period-to-period financial and operating results.

        AllianceBernstein uses various derivative instruments, including futures, forward and swap contracts, in conjunction with AllianceBernstein's seed hedging program. While in most cases broad market risks are hedged, AllianceBernstein's hedges are imperfect and some market risk remains. In addition, AllianceBernstein's use of derivatives results in counterparty risk (i.e., the risk that AllianceBernstein may be exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties to these derivative instruments), regulatory risk (e.g., short selling restrictions) and cash/synthetic basis risk (i.e., the risk that the underlying positions do not move identically to the related derivative instruments).

The individuals, counterparties or issuers on which AllianceBernstein relies in the course of performing services for AllianceBernstein or its clients may be unable or unwilling to honor their contractual obligations to AllianceBernstein.

        AllianceBernstein relies on various third party counterparties and other vendors to fulfill their obligations to AllianceBernstein, whether specified by contract, course of dealing or otherwise. Default rates, downgrades and disputes with counterparties as to the valuation of collateral increase significantly in times of market stress. Furthermore, disruptions in the financial markets and other economic challenges, like those presented by the global financial turmoil during the second quarter of 2012, may cause AllianceBernstein's counterparties and other vendors to experience significant cash flow problems or even render them insolvent, which may expose AllianceBernstein to significant costs.


Table of Contents

AllianceBernstein may not accurately value the securities AllianceBernstein holds on behalf of its clients or AllianceBernstein's company investments.

        In accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, contractual obligations or client direction, AllianceBernstein employs procedures for the pricing and valuation of securities and other positions held in client accounts or for company investments. AllianceBernstein has established a Valuation Committee, composed of senior officers and employees, which oversees pricing controls and valuation processes. If market quotations for a security are not readily available, the Valuation Committee determines a fair value for the security.

        Extraordinary volatility in financial markets, significant liquidity constraints or AllianceBernstein's failure to adequately consider one or more factors when fair valuing a security based on information with limited market observability could result in AllianceBernstein's failing to properly value securities it holds for its clients or investments accounted for on AllianceBernstein's balance sheet. Improper valuation would likely result in AllianceBernstein's basing fee calculations on inaccurate AUM figures, AllianceBernstein's striking incorrect net asset values for company-sponsored mutual funds or hedge funds or, in the case of company investments, AllianceBernstein's inaccurately calculating and reporting AllianceBernstein's financial condition and operating results. Although the overall percentage of AllianceBernstein's AUM that AllianceBernstein's fair value based on information with limited market observability is not significant, inaccurate fair value determinations can harm AllianceBernstein's clients, create regulatory issues and damage AllianceBernstein's reputation.

AllianceBernstein may not have sufficient information to confirm or review the accuracy of valuations provided to AllianceBernstein by underlying external managers for the funds in which certain of AllianceBernstein's alternative investment products invest.

        Certain of AllianceBernstein's alternative investment services invest in funds managed by external managers, or External Managers, rather than investing directly in securities and other instruments. As a result, AllianceBernstein's abilities will be limited with regard to (i) monitoring such investments, (ii) regularly obtaining complete, accurate and current information with respect to such investments and (iii) exercising control over such investments. Accordingly, AllianceBernstein may not have sufficient information to confirm or review the accuracy of valuations provided to AllianceBernstein by External Managers. In addition, AllianceBernstein will be required to rely on External Managers' compliance with any applicable investment guidelines and restrictions. Any failure of an External Manager to operate within such guidelines or to provide accurate information with respect to the investment could subject AllianceBernstein's alternative investment products to losses and cause damage to AllianceBernstein's reputation.

The quantitative models AllianceBernstein uses in certain of AllianceBernstein's investment services may contain errors, resulting in imprecise risk assessments and unintended output.

        AllianceBernstein uses quantitative models in a variety of its investment services, generally in combination with fundamental research. AllianceBernstein's quantitative models are validated by senior quantitative professionals. In 2010, AllianceBernstein formed AllianceBernstein's Model Risk Working Group, the purpose of which is to formalize and oversee a quantitative model governance framework, including minimum validation standards. However, due to the complexity of such models, it is possible that errors in the models could exist and AllianceBernstein's controls could fail to detect such errors. Failure to detect errors could result in client losses and damage to AllianceBernstein's reputation.


Table of Contents

Unpredictable events, including natural disaster, dangerous weather conditions, technology failure, terrorist attack and political unrest, may adversely affect AllianceBernstein's ability to conduct business.

        War, terrorist attack, political unrest in the Middle East, the Pacific Rim and elsewhere, power failure, climate change, natural disaster and rapid spread of infectious diseases could interrupt AllianceBernstein's operations by:

        Despite the contingency plans and facilities AllianceBernstein has in place, including system security measures, information back-up and disaster recovery processes, AllianceBernstein's ability to conduct business may be adversely affected by a disruption in the infrastructure that supports AllianceBernstein's operations and the communities in which they are located. This may include a disruption involving electrical, communications, transportation or other services AllianceBernstein may use or third parties with which AllianceBernstein conducts business. If a disruption occurs in one location and AllianceBernstein's employees in that location are unable to occupy AllianceBernstein's offices or communicate with or travel to other locations, AllianceBernstein's ability to conduct business with and on behalf of AllianceBernstein's clients may suffer, and AllianceBernstein may not be able to successfully implement contingency plans that depend on communication or travel. Furthermore, unauthorized access to AllianceBernstein's systems as a result of a security breach, the failure of AllianceBernstein's systems, or the loss of data could give rise to legal proceedings or regulatory penalties under laws protecting the privacy of personal information, disrupt operations, and damage AllianceBernstein's reputation.

        AllianceBernstein's operations require experienced, professional staff. Loss of a substantial number of such persons or an inability to provide properly equipped places for them to work may, by disrupting AllianceBernstein's operations, adversely affect AllianceBernstein's financial condition, results of operations and business prospects. In addition, AllianceBernstein's property and business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate AllianceBernstein for all losses, failures, or breaches that may occur.

AllianceBernstein is highly dependent on various software applications, technologies and other systems for AllianceBernstein's business to function properly and to safeguard confidential information; any significant limitation, failure or security breach of these systems could constrain AllianceBernstein's operations.

        AllianceBernstein utilizes software and related technologies throughout its business, including both proprietary systems and those provided by outside vendors. AllianceBernstein uses its technology to, among other things, obtain securities pricing information, process client transactions, and provide reports and other customer services to the clients of the funds AllianceBernstein manages. Although AllianceBernstein takes protective measures, including measures to effectively secure information through system security technology and established and tested business continuity plans, AllianceBernstein may experience system delays and interruptions as a result of natural disasters, power failures, acts of war and third-party failures. AllianceBernstein cannot predict with certainty all of the adverse effects that could result from AllianceBernstein's failure, or the failure of a third party, to efficiently address and resolve these delays and interruptions. These adverse effects could include the inability to perform critical business functions or failure to comply with financial reporting and other regulatory requirements, which could lead to loss of client confidence, harm to AllianceBernstein's


Table of Contents

reputation, exposure to disciplinary action and liability to AllianceBernstein's clients. Accordingly, potential system failures and the cost necessary to correct those failures could have a material adverse effect on AllianceBernstein's results of operations and business prospects.

        In addition, AllianceBernstein could be subject to losses if AllianceBernstein fails to properly safeguard sensitive and confidential information. As part of AllianceBernstein's normal operations, AllianceBernstein maintains and transmits confidential information about its clients as well as proprietary information relating to its business operations. Although AllianceBernstein takes protective measures, AllianceBernstein's systems still could be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses or other events that have a security impact, such as an authorized employee or vendor inadvertently or intentionally causing AllianceBernstein to release confidential or proprietary information. Such disclosure could, among other things, allow competitors access to AllianceBernstein's proprietary business information and require significant time and expense to investigate and remediate the breach. Moreover, loss of confidential client information could harm AllianceBernstein's reputation and subject AllianceBernstein to liability under laws that protect confidential personal data, resulting in increased costs or loss of revenues.

        Also, although AllianceBernstein takes precautions to password protect and encrypt AllianceBernstein's laptops and other mobile electronic hardware, if such hardware is stolen, misplaced or left unattended, it may become vulnerable to hacking or other unauthorized use, creating a possible security risk and resulting in potentially costly actions. Most of the software applications that AllianceBernstein uses in its business are licensed from, and supported, upgraded and maintained by, third-party vendors. A suspension or termination of certain of these licenses or the related support, upgrades and maintenance could cause temporary system delays or interruption. In addition, technology rapidly evolves and AllianceBernstein cannot guarantee that AllianceBernstein's competitors may not implement more advanced technology platforms for their products and services, which may place AllianceBernstein at a competitive disadvantage and adversely affect AllianceBernstein's results of operations and business prospects.

AllianceBernstein's own operational failures or those of third parties AllianceBernstein relies on, including failures arising out of human error, could disrupt AllianceBernstein's business, damage AllianceBernstein's reputation and reduce AllianceBernstein's revenues.

        Weaknesses or failures in AllianceBernstein's internal processes or systems could lead to disruption of AllianceBernstein's operations, liability to clients, exposure to disciplinary action or harm to AllianceBernstein's reputation. AllianceBernstein's business is highly dependent on its ability to process, on a daily basis, large numbers of transactions, many of which are highly complex, across numerous and diverse markets. These transactions generally must comply with investment guidelines, as well as stringent legal and regulatory standards.

        AllianceBernstein's obligations to clients require it to exercise skill, care and prudence in performing AllianceBernstein's services. Despite AllianceBernstein's employees being highly trained and skilled, the large number of transactions AllianceBernstein processes makes it highly likely that errors will occasionally occur. Should AllianceBernstein make a mistake in performing AllianceBernstein's services that causes financial harm to a client, AllianceBernstein has a duty to act promptly to put the client in the position the client would have been in had AllianceBernstein not made the error. The occurrence of mistakes, particularly significant ones, can have a material adverse effect on AllianceBernstein's reputation, results of operations and business prospects.


Table of Contents

AllianceBernstein may not always successfully manage actual and potential conflicts of interest that arise in AllianceBernstein's business.

        AllianceBernstein increasingly must manage actual and potential conflicts of interest, including situations where AllianceBernstein's services to a particular client conflict, or are perceived to conflict, with the interests of another client, as well as situations where certain of AllianceBernstein's employees have access to material non-public information that may not be shared with all employees of AllianceBernstein. Failure to adequately address potential conflicts of interest could adversely affect AllianceBernstein's reputation, results of operations and business prospects.

        AllianceBernstein has procedures and controls that are designed to identify and mitigate conflicts of interest, including those designed to prevent the improper sharing of information. However, appropriately managing conflicts of interest is complex and difficult. AllianceBernstein's reputation could be damaged and the willingness of clients to enter into transactions in which such a conflict might arise may be affected if AllianceBernstein fails, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with conflicts of interest. In addition, potential or perceived conflicts could give rise to litigation or regulatory enforcement actions.

Rates AllianceBernstein charges for brokerage transactions have declined significantly over the last several years, and declines may continue. In addition, turmoil in global capital markets and economies may reduce market volumes. Combined, these two factors may adversely affect Bernstein Research Services' revenue.

        Electronic, or "low-touch," trading approaches represent a significant percentage of buy-side trading activity and produce transaction fees for execution-only services that are a small fraction of traditional full service fee rates. As a result, blended pricing for the industry and SCB LLC, SCBL and Sanford C. Bernstein (Hong Kong) Limited, collectively, SCB, has declined over the last several years. In addition, fee rates charged by SCB and other brokers for traditional brokerage services have also historically experienced price pressure, and AllianceBernstein expects these trends to continue. While increases in transaction volume and market share have in the past often offset decreases in rates, this may not continue. Recent economic and market turmoil has severely impacted much of SCB's client base, which in the near-term may adversely affect transaction volume generally.

AllianceBernstein's insurance policies may be insufficient to protect AllianceBernstein against large losses.

        AllianceBernstein can make no assurance that a claim or claims will be covered by AllianceBernstein's insurance policies or, if covered, will not exceed the limits of available insurance coverage, or that AllianceBernstein's insurers will remain solvent and meet their obligations.

AllianceBernstein's business is subject to pervasive, complex and frequently evolving global regulation, the compliance with which could involve substantial expenditures of time and money, and the violation of which may result in material adverse consequences.

        Virtually all aspects of AllianceBernstein's business are subject to federal and state laws and regulations, rules of securities regulators and exchanges, and laws and regulations in the foreign jurisdictions in which AllianceBernstein's subsidiaries conduct business. If AllianceBernstein violates these laws or regulations, AllianceBernstein could be subject to civil liability, criminal liability or sanction, including revocation of AllianceBernstein's and its subsidiaries' professional licenses or registrations, revocation of the licenses of AllianceBernstein's employees, censures, fines, or temporary suspension or permanent bar from conducting business. Any such liability or sanction could have a material adverse effect on AllianceBernstein's financial condition, results of operations, and business prospects. A regulatory proceeding, even if it does not result in a finding of wrongdoing or sanction, could require substantial expenditures of time and money.


Table of Contents

        These laws and regulations generally grant supervisory agencies and bodies broad administrative powers, including, in some cases, the power to limit or restrict doing business for failure to comply with such laws and regulations. Moreover, regulators in non-U.S. jurisdictions could change their policies or laws in a manner that might restrict or otherwise impede AllianceBernstein's ability to market, distribute, or register investment products in their respective markets. These local requirements could increase the expenses AllianceBernstein incurs in a specific jurisdiction without any corresponding increase in revenues from operating in the jurisdiction.

        In addition, there is uncertainty associated with the regulatory environments in which AllianceBernstein operates, including uncertainty created by the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank Act fundamentally changed the U.S. financial regulatory landscape and may impose additional restrictions and limitations on AllianceBernstein's business as the various rules and regulations required for implementation continue to be adopted.

Changes to the rules governing fees payable under Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act may affect the revenues AllianceBernstein derives from its Retail Services.

        In July 2010, the SEC proposed a new rule and rule amendments to the Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act that would alter distribution and service fees for the distribution and sale of a U.S. open-ended fund's shares, or Rule 12b-1 fees. The new rule and amendments would continue to allow funds to bear promotional costs within certain limits and would also preserve the ability of funds to provide investors with alternatives for paying sales charges (e.g., at the time of purchase, at the time of redemption or through a continuing fee charged to fund assets). Unlike the current Rule 12b-1 framework, however, the proposed rules would limit the cumulative sales charges each investor pays, regardless of how they are imposed.

        If rules are adopted as proposed, changes in Rule 12b-1 fees for a number of share classes offered by company-sponsored mutual funds would be required, which would reduce the net fund distribution revenues AllianceBernstein receives from company-sponsored mutual funds. The impact of this rule change is dependent upon the final rules adopted by the SEC, any phase-in or grandfathering period, and any other changes made with respect to share class distribution arrangements.

The financial services industry is intensely competitive.

        AllianceBernstein competes on the basis of a number of factors, including AllianceBernstein's array of investment services, AllianceBernstein's investment performance for its clients, innovation, reputation and price. By having a global presence, AllianceBernstein may face competitors with more experience and more established relationships with clients, regulators and industry participants in the relevant market, which could adversely affect AllianceBernstein's ability to expand. Furthermore, AllianceBernstein's underperformance in certain of AllianceBernstein's core equities services during 2012 may place continued pressure on AllianceBernstein's flows during 2013, which may make it more difficult for AllianceBernstein to compete effectively.

AllianceBernstein is involved in various legal proceedings and regulatory matters and may be involved in such proceedings in the future, any one or combination of which could have a material adverse effect on AllianceBernstein's financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.

        AllianceBernstein is involved in various matters, including regulatory inquiries, administrative proceedings and litigation, some of which allege significant damages, and AllianceBernstein may be involved in additional matters in the future. Litigation is subject to significant uncertainties, particularly when plaintiffs allege substantial or indeterminate damages, the litigation is in its early stages, or when the litigation is highly complex or broad in scope.


Table of Contents

The partnership structure of AllianceBernstein Holding L.P., or Holding, and AllianceBernstein limits Unitholders' abilities to influence the management and operation of AllianceBernstein's business and is highly likely to prevent a change in control of Holding and AllianceBernstein.

        AllianceBernstein Corporation, or the General Partner, as general partner of both Holding and AllianceBernstein, generally has the exclusive right and full authority and responsibility to manage, conduct, control and operate their respective businesses, except as otherwise expressly stated in their respective Amended and Restated Agreements of Limited Partnership. Holding and AllianceBernstein Unitholders have more limited voting rights on matters affecting AllianceBernstein than do holders of common stock in a corporation. Both Amended and Restated Agreements of Limited Partnership provide that Unitholders do not have any right to vote for directors of the General Partner and that Unitholders can only vote on certain extraordinary matters (including removal of the General Partner under certain extraordinary circumstances). Additionally, the AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement includes significant restrictions on transfers of AllianceBernstein units and provisions that have the practical effect of preventing the removal of the General Partner, which are highly likely to prevent a change in control of AllianceBernstein's management.

AllianceBernstein units are illiquid.

        There is no public trading market for AllianceBernstein units and AllianceBernstein does not anticipate that a public trading market will ever develop. The AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement restricts AllianceBernstein's ability to participate in a public trading market or anything substantially equivalent to one by providing that any transfer which may cause AllianceBernstein to be classified as a "publicly traded partnership" as defined in Section 7704 of the Code shall be deemed void and shall not be recognized by AllianceBernstein. In addition, AllianceBernstein units are subject to significant restrictions on transfer; all transfers of AllianceBernstein units are subject to the written consent of AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company, or AXA Equitable, and the General Partner pursuant to the AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement. Generally, neither AXA Equitable nor the General Partner will permit any transfer that it believes would create a risk that AllianceBernstein would be treated as a corporation for tax purposes. AXA Equitable and the General Partner have implemented a transfer program that requires a seller to locate a purchaser, and imposes annual volume restrictions on transfers. You may request a copy of the transfer program from AllianceBernstein's Corporate Secretary (corporate_secretary@alliancebernstein.com).

Changes in the partnership structure of Holding and AllianceBernstein and/or changes in the tax law governing partnerships would have significant tax ramifications.

        Holding, having elected under Section 7704(g) of the Code to be subject to a 3.5% federal tax on partnership gross income from the active conduct of a trade or business, is a "grandfathered" publicly traded partnership, or PTP, for federal income tax purposes. Holding is also subject to the 4.0% New York City unincorporated business tax, or UBT, net of credits for UBT paid by AllianceBernstein. In order to preserve Holding's status as a "grandfathered" PTP for federal income tax purposes, management ensures that Holding does not directly or indirectly (through AllianceBernstein) enter into a substantial new line of business. A "new line of business" includes any business that is not closely related to AllianceBernstein's historical business of providing research and diversified investment management and related services to its clients. A new line of business is "substantial" when a partnership derives more than 15% of its gross income from, or uses more than 15% of its total assets in, the new line of business.

        AllianceBernstein is a private partnership for federal income tax purposes and, accordingly, is not subject to federal and state corporate income taxes. However, AllianceBernstein is subject to the 4.0% UBT. Domestic corporate subsidiaries of AllianceBernstein, which are subject to federal, state and local income taxes, are generally included in the filing of a consolidated federal income tax return with separate state and local income tax returns being filed. Foreign corporate subsidiaries are generally


Table of Contents

subject to taxes in the foreign jurisdiction where they are located. As AllianceBernstein's business increasingly operates in countries other than the U.S., AllianceBernstein's effective tax rate is expected to increase over time because AllianceBernstein's international subsidiaries are subject to corporate level taxes in the jurisdictions where they are located.

        In order to preserve AllianceBernstein's status as a private partnership for federal income tax purposes, AllianceBernstein units must not be considered publicly traded. The AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement provides that all transfers of AllianceBernstein units must be approved by AXA Equitable and the General Partner; AXA Equitable and the General Partner approve only those transfers permitted pursuant to one or more of the safe harbors contained in relevant treasury regulations. If such units were considered readily tradable, AllianceBernstein would be subject to federal and state corporate income tax on its net income. Furthermore, as noted above, should AllianceBernstein enter into a substantial new line of business, Holding, by virtue of its ownership of AllianceBernstein, would lose its status as a grandfathered PTP and would become subject to corporate income tax as set forth above.

        In years prior to 2010, Congress proposed tax legislation that would cause certain PTPs to be taxed as corporations, thus subjecting their income to a higher level of income tax. Holding is a PTP that derives its income from investment management services through its ownership interest in AllianceBernstein. The legislation, in the form proposed, would not have affected Holding's tax status. Also, this proposed legislation would not have affected AllianceBernstein because it is a private partnership.

        In addition, recent decisions by members of Congress and their staffs regarding the need for fundamental tax reform and possible tax law changes to raise additional revenue have included suggestions that all large partnerships (which would include both AllianceBernstein and Holding) be taxed as corporations. However, AllianceBernstein cannot predict whether, or in what form, tax legislation will be proposed in the future, and AllianceBernstein is unable to determine what effect any new legislation might have on AllianceBernstein. If Holding and AllianceBernstein were to lose their federal tax status as partnerships, they would be subject to corporate income tax, which would reduce materially their net income and quarterly distributions to Unitholders.


Table of Contents


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        This proxy statement/prospectus contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions, that, if they do not materialize or prove incorrect, could cause the results of AllianceBernstein or the combined company to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally are identified by words such as "may," "will," "project," "might," "expects," "anticipates," "believes," "intends," "estimates," "should," "could," "would," "strategy," "plan," "continue," "pursue," or the negative of these words or other words or expressions of similar meaning. All statements made by AllianceBernstein relating to AllianceBernstein or the combined company other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements. For example, forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about: the performance of financial markets, the investment performance of sponsored investment products and separately managed accounts, general economic conditions, industry trends, future acquisitions, competitive conditions and government regulations, including changes in tax regulations and rates and the manner in which the earnings of publicly traded partnerships are taxed, future financial and operating results, plans, expectations, timing of achieving positive cash flow, potential revenue, assets under management and profits of the combined company, the benefits of the proposed merger, costs and expenses, interest rates, outcome of contingencies, business strategies and cost savings; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations, including the execution of integration and restructuring plans and the anticipated timing of filings, approvals and the closing related to the merger; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; statements of belief and any statement of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. The risks, uncertainties and assumptions referred to above include the risk that the merger may not close on the expected schedule or at all, including the risk that the required W.P. Stewart stockholder approval for the merger and related transactions may not be obtained; the possibility that expected synergies and cost savings will not be obtained or that litigation may delay the merger; the difficulty of integrating the business of the two companies; changes in economic conditions; the ability to obtain regulatory approvals and meet other closing conditions to the merger; and other risks and uncertainties described in the section entitled "Risk Factors." You should note that the discussion of AllianceBernstein's reasons for the merger contains forward-looking statements that describe beliefs, assumptions and estimates as of the indicated dates and those forward-looking expectations may have changed as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus.

        The forward-looking statements referred to in the preceding paragraph include statements regarding:


Table of Contents


Table of Contents

        If any of these risks or uncertainties materialize or any of these assumptions prove incorrect, the results of AllianceBernstein or the combined company could differ materially from the expectations in these statements. The forward-looking statements included in this proxy statement/prospectus are made only as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, and AllianceBernstein is not under any obligation to update its forward-looking statements and does not intend to do so.


Table of Contents


THE COMPANIES

ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN

        As used in this section, the words "we" and "our" and the "firm" refer collectively to AllianceBernstein L.P. and its subsidiaries ("AllianceBernstein"), or to their officers and employees. Similarly, the word "company" refers to AllianceBernstein. We use "global" in this section to refer to all nations, including the United States; we use "international" or "non-U.S." to refer to nations other than the United States. We use "emerging markets" in this section to refer to countries included in the Morgan Stanley Capital International ("MSCI") emerging markets index, which are, as of December 31, 2012, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Egypt, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and Turkey. We use the term "hedge funds" in this section to refer to private investment funds we sponsor that utilize various alternative strategies such as leverage, short selling of securities, and the use of forward contracts, currency options and other derivatives.


Business

        AllianceBernstein is an investment adviser registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. AllianceBernstein provides management services for many of the largest U.S. public and private employee benefit plans, endowments, foundations, public employee retirement funds, banks, insurance companies and high net worth individuals worldwide.

        Additional information regarding AllianceBernstein is contained in AllianceBernstein's filings with the SEC.

        AllianceBernstein's principal executive offices are located at 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10105. AllianceBernstein's telephone number is (212) 969-1000.

Mission

        Our firm's mission is to be the most trusted investment firm in the world by placing our clients' interests first and foremost, utilizing our research capabilities to have more knowledge than any other investment firm, and using and sharing knowledge better than our competitors to help our clients achieve financial peace of mind and investment success.

Clients

        AllianceBernstein provides research, diversified investment management and related services globally to a broad range of clients, including:


Table of Contents

        We also provide distribution, shareholder servicing and administrative services to our sponsored mutual funds.

Research

        Our high-quality, in-depth research is the foundation of our business. We believe that our global team of research professionals gives us a competitive advantage in achieving investment success for our clients.

        Our research disciplines include fundamental, quantitative and economic research and currency forecasting. In addition, we have several specialized research initiatives, including research examining global strategic developments that can affect multiple industries and geographies.

Products and Services

        We offer a broad range of investment products and services to our clients:

        These services are provided by teams of investment professionals with significant expertise in their respective disciplines (see"Employees"). Our buy-side research analysts support our portfolio managers and, together, they oversee a number of different types of investment services within various vehicles (discussed above) and strategies (discussed below). Our sell-side research analysts provide the foundation for our Bernstein Research Services.

        Our services include:


Table of Contents

        Sub-advisory client mandates span our investment strategies, including value, growth, fixed income and blend. We serve as sub-adviser for retail mutual funds, insurance products, retirement platforms and institutional investment products.

        We provide our services using various investment disciplines, including market capitalization (e.g., large-, mid- and small-cap equities), term (e.g., long-, intermediate- and short-duration debt securities), and geographic location (e.g., U.S., international, global and emerging markets), as well as local and regional disciplines in major markets around the world.

        We market and distribute alternative investment products globally to high-net-worth clients and institutional investors. Alternative product AUM totaled $11.6 billion as of December 31, 2012, $9.7 billion of which was institutional AUM, $1.5 billion of which was private client AUM and $0.4 billion of which was retail AUM.

        In 2008, we created a unit called AllianceBernstein Defined Contribution Investments ("ABDC") focused on expanding our firm's capabilities in the defined contribution ("DC") market. ABDC seeks to provide the most effective DC investment solutions in the industry, as measured by product features, reliability, cost and flexibility, to meet specialized client needs by integrating research and investment design, product strategy, strategic partnerships (e.g., record-keeper partnerships and operations collaboration), and client implementation and service. In November 2010, we introduced Lifetime Income Strategies (formerly known as Secure Retirement Strategies, "LIS"), a multi-manager target-date solution. LIS provides guaranteed lifetime retirement income backed by multiple insurers to participants of large DC plans. We had our first LIS client funding during the second quarter of 2012 and are in discussions with additional plan sponsors to introduce LIS in their plans in 2013.

        As of December 31, 2012, our DC assets under management, which are distributed in all three of our buy-side distribution channels, totaled approximately $26.0 billion.

Global Reach

        We serve clients in major global markets through operations in 44 cities in 22 countries. Our client base includes investors throughout the Americas, Europe, Asia, Africa and Australia. We utilize an integrated global investment platform that provides our clients with access to local (country-specific), international, and global research and investment strategies.

        Assets under management by client domicile and investment service as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:


By Client Domicile ($ in billions):

GRAPHIC


Table of Contents


By Investment Service ($ in billions):

GRAPHIC

Revenues

        We earn revenues primarily by charging fees for managing the investment assets of, and providing research to, our clients.

        We generally calculate investment advisory fees as a percentage of the value of AUM at a specific date or as a percentage of the value of average AUM for the applicable billing period, with these percentages varying by type of investment service, size of account and total amount of assets we manage for a particular client. Accordingly, fee income generally increases or decreases as AUM increase or decrease. Increases in AUM generally result from market appreciation, positive investment performance for clients, net asset inflows from new and existing clients, or acquisitions. Similarly, decreases in AUM generally result from market depreciation, negative investment performance for clients, or net asset outflows due to client redemptions, account terminations or asset withdrawals.

        We are eligible to earn performance-based fees on some alternative investment services, including hedge fund services, as well as some long-only services provided to our institutional clients. For these services, we charge a base advisory fee and are eligible to earn an additional performance-based fee or incentive allocation that is calculated as either a percentage of absolute investment results or a percentage of investment results in excess of a stated benchmark over a specified period of time. Some performance-based fees include a high-watermark provision, which generally provides that if a client account underperforms relative to its performance target (whether absolute or relative to a specified benchmark), it must gain back such underperformance before we can collect future performance-based fees. Therefore, if we fail to achieve our performance target for a particular period, we will not earn a performance-based fee for that period and, for accounts with a high-watermark provision, our ability to earn future performance-based fees will be impaired. If the percentage of our AUM subject to performance-based fees grows, seasonality and volatility of revenue and earnings are likely to become more significant. Our performance-based fees in 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $66.6 million (including $39.6 million pertaining to winding up the Public-Private Investment Program ("PPIP") fund, $16.5 million and $20.5 million, respectively.

        We sometimes experience periods when the number of new accounts or the amount of AUM increases or decreases significantly. These changes result from wide-ranging factors, including conditions of financial markets, our investment performance for clients, the experience of the portfolio manager (both with our firm and in the industry generally), the client's overall relationship with us, consultant recommendations, and changes in our clients' investment preferences, risk tolerances and liquidity needs.

        Our Bernstein Research Services generate revenues from clients to whom we provide research, portfolio strategy advice and brokerage-related services, primarily in the form of transaction fees calculated as either "cents per share" (generally in the U.S. market) or a percentage of the value of the securities traded (generally outside of the U.S.) for these clients.


Table of Contents

        Our revenues may fluctuate for a number of reasons; see "Risk Factors" and "The Companies—AllianceBernstein—Management's Discussion and Analysis."

Employees

        Our firm's 3,318 full-time employees as of December 31, 2012, who are located in 22 countries, include 261 research analysts, 136 portfolio managers, 34 traders and 14 professionals with other investment-related responsibilities. We have employed these professionals for an average period of approximately nine years, and their average investment experience is approximately 18 years. We consider our employee relations to be good.

Institutional Services

        We serve our institutional clients primarily through AllianceBernstein Institutional Investments, a unit of AllianceBernstein, and through other units in our international subsidiaries (institutional relationships of less than $25 million are generally serviced by Bernstein GWM, our Private Client channel,discussed below). Institutional Services include actively managed equity accounts (including growth, value and blend accounts), fixed income accounts and balanced accounts (which combine equity and fixed income), as well as passive management of index and enhanced index accounts. These services are provided through separately managed accounts, sub-advisory relationships, structured products, collective investment trusts, mutual funds, hedge funds and other investment vehicles. As of December 31, 2012, institutional AUM were $220 billion, or 51% of our company-wide AUM, as compared to $224 billion, or 55%, as of December 31, 2011 and $273 billion, or 57%, as of December 31, 2010. For more information concerning institutional AUM, revenues and fees, see"Assets Under Management, Revenues and Fees" below.

        Our institutional client base includes unaffiliated corporate and public employee pension funds, endowment funds, domestic and foreign institutions and governments, and certain of our affiliates (AXA and its subsidiaries), as well as certain sub-advisory relationships with unaffiliated sponsors of various other investment products. We manage approximately 802 mandates for these clients, which are located in 37 countries.

Retail Services

        We provide investment management and related services to a wide variety of individual retail investors, both in the U.S. and internationally, through retail mutual funds sponsored by our company and our subsidiaries; mutual fund sub-advisory relationships; Separately managed Account Programs; and other investment vehicles ("Retail Products and Services"). As of December 31, 2012, retail AUM were $144 billion, or 34% of our company-wide AUM, as compared to $113 billion, or 28%, as of December 31, 2011 and $127 billion, or 27%, as of December 31, 2010. For more information concerning retail AUM, revenues and fees, see"Assets Under Management, Revenues and Fees" below.

        Our Retail Products and Services are designed to provide disciplined, research-based investments that contribute to a well-diversified investment portfolio. We distribute these products and services through financial intermediaries, including broker-dealers, insurance sales representatives, banks, registered investment advisers and financial planners. These products and services include open-end and closed-end funds that are either (i) registered as investment companies under the Investment Company Act ("U.S. Funds"), or (ii) not registered under the Investment Company Act and generally not offered to United States persons ("Non-U.S. Funds" and, collectively with the U.S. Funds, "AllianceBernstein Funds"). They provide a broad range of investment options, including local and global value equities, growth equities, blend strategies, fixed income securities and alternative investment products. They also include Separately Managed Account Programs, which are sponsored by financial intermediaries and generally charge an all-inclusive fee covering investment management, trade execution, asset allocation, and custodial and administrative services. We also provide distribution, shareholder servicing, and administrative services for our Retail Products and Services.


Table of Contents

        Our U.S. Funds, which include retail funds, our variable products series fund (a component of an insurance product) and the retail share classes of the Sanford C. Bernstein Funds (principally Private Client Services products), currently offer 120 different portfolios to U.S. investors. As of December 31, 2012, retail U.S. Funds AUM were approximately $45 billion, or 31% of total retail AUM, as compared to $41 billion, or 36%, as of December 31, 2011 and $46 billion, or 36%, as of December 31, 2010. Because of the way they are marketed and serviced, we report substantially all of the AUM in the Sanford C. Bernstein Funds ("SCB Funds"), which totaled $28 billion as of December 31, 2012, as private client AUM.

        Our Non-U.S. Funds are distributed internationally by local financial intermediaries to non-U.S. investors in most major international markets by means of distribution agreements. As of December 31, 2012, these funds consisted of 92 different portfolios and AUM in these funds were $60 billion, $6 billion of which was invested in local-market funds that we distribute in Japan through financial intermediaries.

        AllianceBernstein Investments serves as the principal underwriter and distributor of the U.S. Funds. AllianceBernstein Investments employs 118 sales representatives who devote their time to promoting the sale of U.S. Funds and certain other Retail Products and Services offered by financial intermediaries.

        AllianceBernstein (Luxembourg) S.A. ("AllianceBernstein Luxembourg"), a Luxembourg management company and one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, generally serves as the distributor for the Non-U.S. Funds.

        We have an international sales force of 69 sales representatives as of December 31, 2012 who devote some or all of their time to promoting the sale of Non-U.S. Funds and other Retail Products and Services offered by financial intermediaries.

        Our Retail Products and Services include open-end mutual funds designed to fund benefits under variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies offered by unaffiliated life insurance companies ("Sub-Advised Variable Products"), and we sub-advise variable product mutual funds sponsored by affiliates. As of December 31, 2012, we managed or sub-advised approximately $33 billion of Sub-Advised Variable Product AUM.

Private Client Services

        Through Bernstein GWM, we provide Private Client Services to high-net-worth individuals, trusts and estates, charitable foundations, partnerships, private and family corporations, and other entities by means of separately managed accounts, hedge funds, mutual funds and other investment vehicles. As of December 31, 2012, private client AUM were $66 billion, or 15% of our company-wide AUM, as compared to $69 billion, or 17%, as of December 31, 2011 and $78 billion, or 16%, as of December 31, 2010. For more information concerning private client AUM, revenues and fees, see"Assets Under Management, Revenues and Fees" below.

        Our Private Client Services are built on a sales effort that involves approximately 253 financial advisors as of December 31, 2012 based in 18 cities in the U.S. These advisors do not manage money, but work with private clients and their tax, legal and other advisors to assist them in determining a suitable mix of U.S. and non-U.S. equity securities and fixed income investments. The diversified portfolio created for each client is intended to maximize after-tax investment returns, in light of the client's individual investment goals, income requirements, risk tolerance, tax situation and other relevant factors. In creating these portfolios, we utilize our research reports, investment planning services, the dynamic asset allocation service and Bernstein GWM, which has in-depth knowledge of trust, estate and tax planning strategies.


Table of Contents

Bernstein Research Services

        Bernstein Research Services consist of fundamental research, quantitative services and brokerage-related services in equities and listed options provided to institutional investors such as pension fund, hedge fund and mutual fund managers, and other institutional investors. Brokerage-related services are provided by SCB LLC in the United States and SCBL primarily in Europe, with research services also provided by Sanford C. Bernstein (Hong Kong) Limited (an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein, "SCB Hong Kong"), in Asia. For more information concerning the revenues we derive from Bernstein Research Services, see"Assets Under Management, Revenues and Fees."

        We provide fundamental company and industry research along with disciplined research into securities valuation and factors affecting stock-price movements. Our analysts are consistently among the highest ranked research analysts in industry surveys conducted by third-party organizations.

Assets Under Management, Revenues and Fees

        The following tables summarize our AUM and revenues by distribution channel:


End of Period Assets Under Management

 
 December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in millions)
  
  
 

Institutions

 $219,819 $223,874 $272,928  (1.8)% (18.0)%

Retail

  144,392  112,605  127,045  28.2  (11.4)

Private Client

  65,806  69,418  78,046  (5.2) (11.1)
              

Total

 $430,017 $405,897 $478,019  5.9  (15.1)
              


Average Assets Under Management

 
 Years Ended December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in millions)
  
  
 

Institutions

 $218,923 $252,597 $277,109  (13.3)% (8.8)%

Retail

  128,216  124,012  122,756  3.4  1.0 

Private Client

  68,839  75,323  74,686  (8.6) 0.9 
              

Total

 $415,978 $451,932 $474,551  (8.0) (4.8)
              

Table of Contents


Revenues

 
 Years Ended December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in thousands)
  
  
 

Institutional Services

 $485,651 $616,787 $764,847  (21.3)% (19.4)%

Retail Services

  1,192,895  1,092,561  1,068,869  9.2  2.2 

Private Client Services

  585,791  652,097  651,218  (10.2) 0.1 

Bernstein Research Services

  413,707  437,414  430,521  (5.4) 1.6 

Other(1)

  61,915  (46,418) 36,650  n/m  n/m 
              

Total Revenues

  2,739,959  2,752,441  2,952,105  (0.5) (6.8)

Less: Interest Expense

  3,222  2,550  3,548  26.4  (28.1)
              

Net Revenues

 $2,736,737 $2,749,891 $2,948,557  (0.5) (6.7)
              

(1)
Other revenues primarily consist of investment gains (losses) and dividend and interest income.

        AXA and its subsidiaries, whose AUM consist primarily of fixed income investments, together constitute our largest client. Our affiliates represented approximately 25%, 23% and 22% of our company-wide AUM as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We earned approximately 4%, 4% and 5% of our company-wide net revenues from our affiliates in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Affiliated AUM is included in our Institutions and Retail buy-side distribution channels.


Table of Contents

        The following tables summarize our Institutional Services AUM and revenues:


Institutional Services Assets Under Management
(by Investment Service)

 
 December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in millions)
  
  
 

Value Equity:

                

U.S. 

 $2,476 $7,469 $13,955  (66.8)% (46.5)%

Global and International

  22,642  37,316  74,668  (39.3) (50.0)
              

  25,118  44,785  88,623  (43.9) (49.5)
              

Growth Equity:

                

U.S. 

  3,479  5,541  10,921  (37.2) (49.3)

Global and International

  3,426  7,417  22,507  (53.8) (67.0)
              

  6,905  12,958  33,428  (46.7) (61.2)
              

Fixed Income:

                

U.S. 

  92,112  86,329  78,101  6.7  10.5 

Global and International

  54,015  44,983  44,766  20.1  0.5 
              

  146,127  131,312  122,867  11.3  6.9 
              

Other(1):

                

U.S. 

  11,820  11,278  9,980  4.8  13.0 

Global and International

  29,849  23,541  18,030  26.8  30.6 
              

  41,669  34,819  28,010  19.7  24.3 
              

Total:

                

U.S. 

  109,887  110,617  112,957  (0.7) (2.1)

Global and International

  109,932  113,257  159,971  (2.9) (29.2)
              

Total

 $219,819 $223,874 $272,928  (1.8) (18.0)
              

Affiliated

 $77,569 $69,071 $74,672  12.3  (7.5)

Non-affiliated

  142,250  154,803  198,256  (8.1) (21.9)
              

Total

 $219,819 $223,874 $272,928  (1.8) (18.0)
              

(1)
Includes index, structured, asset allocation services and certain other alternative investments.

Table of Contents


Revenues from Institutional Services
(by Investment Service)

 
 Years Ended December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in thousands)
  
  
 

Investment Advisory and Services Fees:

                

Value Equity:

                

U.S. 

 $17,433 $33,615 $47,126  (48.1)% (28.7)%

Global and International

  125,641  246,919  336,600  (49.1) (26.6)
              

  143,074  280,534  383,726  (49.0) (26.9)
              

Growth Equity:

                

U.S. 

  27,119  38,807  46,510  (30.1) (16.6)

Global and International

  19,856  62,023  119,300  (68.0) (48.0)
              

  46,975  100,830  165,810  (53.4) (39.2)
              

Fixed Income:

                

U.S. 

  145,216  115,051  103,855  26.2  10.8 

Global and International

  108,778  96,988  94,434  12.2  2.7 
              

  253,994  212,039  198,289  19.8  6.9 
              

Other(1):

                

U.S. 

  8,091  6,555  3,436  23.4  90.8 

Global and International

  33,155  16,233  12,866  104.2  26.2 
              

  41,246  22,788  16,302  81.0  39.8 
              

Total Investment Advisory and Services Fees:

                

U.S. 

  197,859  194,028  200,927  2.0  (3.4)

Global and International

  287,430  422,163  563,200  (31.9) (25.0)
              

  485,289  616,191  764,127  (21.2) (19.4)

Shareholder Servicing Fees(2)

  362  596  720  (39.3) (17.2)
              

Total

 $485,651 $616,787 $764,847  (21.3) (19.4)
              

Affiliated

 $82,930 $82,965 $88,248    (6.0)

Non-affiliated

  402,721  533,822  676,599  (24.6) (21.1)
              

Total

 $485,651 $616,787 $764,847  (21.3) (19.4)
              

(1)
Includes index, structured, asset allocation services and certain other alternative investments.

(2)
For a description of distribution revenues and shareholder servicing fees, see"Retail Services" below.

        As of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, Institutional Services represented approximately 51%, 55% and 57%, respectively, of our company-wide AUM. The fees we earned from these services represented approximately 18%, 22% and 26% of our company-wide net revenues for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

        AXA and its subsidiaries together constitute our largest institutional client. Their AUM accounted for approximately 35%, 31% and 27% of our total institutional AUM as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and approximately 17%, 13% and 12% of our total institutional revenues for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.


Table of Contents

        The institutional AUM we manage for our affiliates, along with our nine other largest institutional accounts, accounted for approximately 53% of our total institutional AUM as of December 31, 2012 and approximately 30% of our total institutional revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012. No single institutional client other than AXA and its subsidiaries accounted for more than approximately 1% of our company-wide net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012.

        We manage the assets of our institutional clients through written investment management agreements or other arrangements, all of which are generally terminable at any time or upon relatively short notice by either party. In general, our written investment management agreements may not be assigned without client consent.

        We are compensated principally on the basis of investment advisory fees calculated as a percentage of AUM. The percentage we charge varies with the type of investment service, the size of the account and the total amount of assets we manage for a particular client.

        We are eligible to earn performance-based fees on approximately 8% of institutional AUM, which are primarily invested in long-only equity and fixed income services. Performance-based fees provide for a base advisory fee plus an additional fee based on investment performance.


Table of Contents

        The following tables summarize our Retail Services AUM and revenues:


Retail Services Assets Under Management
(by Investment Service)

 
 December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in millions)
  
  
 

Value Equity:

                

U.S. 

 $7,659 $7,769 $10,772  (1.4)% (27.9)%

Global and International

  7,979  10,351  20,107  (22.9) (48.5)
              

  15,638  18,120  30,879  (13.7) (41.3)
              

Growth Equity:

                

U.S. 

  10,319  8,568  9,789  20.4  (12.5)

Global and International

  8,468  9,110  14,002  (7.0) (34.9)
              

  18,787  17,678  23,791  6.3  (25.7)
              

Fixed Income:

                

U.S. 

  11,598  8,895  8,442  30.4  5.4 

Global and International

  66,009  42,843  40,754  54.1  5.1 
              

  77,607  51,738  49,196  50.0  5.2 
              

Other(1):

                

U.S. 

  20,514  18,013  18,466  13.9  (2.5)

Global and International

  11,846  7,056  4,713  67.9  49.7 
              

  32,360  25,069  23,179  29.1  8.2 
              

Total:

                

U.S. 

  50,090  43,245  47,469  15.8  (8.9)

Global and International

  94,302  69,360  79,576  36.0  (12.8)
              

Total

 $144,392 $112,605 $127,045  28.2  (11.4)
              

Affiliated

 $28,535 $22,561 $29,841  26.5  (24.4)

Non-affiliated

  115,857  90,044  97,204  28.7  (7.4)
              

Total

 $144,392 $112,605 $127,045  28.2  (11.4)
              

(1)
Includes index, structured, asset allocation services and certain other alternative investments.

Table of Contents


Revenues from Retail Services
(by Investment Service)

 
 Years Ended December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in thousands)
  
  
 

Investment Advisory and Services Fees:

                

Value Equity:

                

U.S. 

 $40,595 $43,148 $45,862  (5.9)% (5.9)%

Global and International

  53,213  82,868  112,252  (35.8) (26.2)
              

  93,808  126,016  158,114  (25.6) (20.3)
              

Growth Equity:

                

U.S. 

  52,242  50,572  45,752  3.3  10.5 

Global and International

  62,624  83,884  97,973  (25.3) (14.4)
              

  114,866  134,456  143,725  (14.6) (6.4)
              

Fixed Income:

                

U.S. 

  46,821  34,143  31,723  37.1  7.6 

Global and International

  409,115  332,791  282,845  22.9  17.7 
              

  455,936  366,934  314,568  24.3  16.6 
              

Other(1):

                

U.S. 

  21,470  15,447  11,672  39.0  32.3 

Global and International

  19,181  9,646  11,798  98.8  (18.2)
              

  40,651  25,093  23,470  62.0  6.9 
              

Total Investment Advisory and Services Fees:

                

U.S. 

  161,128  143,310  135,009  12.4  6.1 

Global and International

  544,133  509,189  504,868  6.9  0.9 
              

  705,261  652,499  639,877  8.1  2.0 

Distribution Revenues(2)

  399,259  348,456  336,204  14.6  3.6 

Shareholder Servicing Fees(2)

  88,375  91,606  92,788  (3.5) (1.3)
              

Total

 $1,192,895 $1,092,561 $1,068,869  9.2  2.2 
              

Affiliated

 $31,089 $31,301 $46,756  (0.7) (33.1)

Non-affiliated

  1,161,806  1,061,260  1,022,113  9.5  3.8 
              

Total

 $1,192,895 $1,092,561 $1,068,869  9.2  2.2 
              

(1)
Includes index, structured, asset allocation services and certain other alternative investments.

(2)
For a description of distribution revenues and shareholder servicing fees, see "Retail Services" below.

        Investment advisory fees and distribution fees for our Retail Products and Services are generally charged as a percentage of average daily AUM. In the past, as certain of the U.S. Funds grew, we revised our fee schedules to provide lower incremental fees above certain asset levels. Fees paid by the U.S. Funds, EQ Advisors Trust ("EQAT") and AXA Premier VIP Trust are reflected in the applicable investment management agreement, which generally must be approved annually by the boards of directors or trustees of those funds, including by a majority of the independent directors or trustees. Increases in these fees must be approved by fund shareholders; decreases need not be, including any decreases implemented by a fund's directors or trustees. In general, each investment management


Table of Contents

agreement with the U.S. Funds, EQAT and AXA Premier VIP Trust provides for termination by either party at any time upon 60 days' notice.

        Fees paid by Non-U.S. Funds are reflected in investment management agreements that continue until they are terminated. Increases in these fees generally must be approved by the relevant regulatory authority, depending on the domicile and structure of the fund, and Non-U.S. Fund shareholders must be given advance notice of any fee increases.

        Revenues from Retail Services represented approximately 44%, 40% and 36% of our company-wide net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

        The mutual funds we sub-advise for AXA and its subsidiaries together constitute our largest retail client. They accounted for approximately 20%, 20% and 23% of our total retail AUM as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and approximately 3%, 3% and 4% of our total retail revenues for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

        Our mutual fund distribution system (the "System") includes a multi-class share structure that permits open-end AllianceBernstein Funds to offer investors various options for the purchase of mutual fund shares, including both front-end load shares and back-end load shares. For front-end load shares, AllianceBernstein Investments generally pays sales commissions to financial intermediaries distributing the funds from the front-end sales charge it receives from investors at the time of the sale. For back-end load shares, AllianceBernstein Investments pays sales commissions to financial intermediaries at the time of sale and also receives higher ongoing distribution services fees from the mutual funds. In addition, investors who redeem back-end load shares before the expiration of the minimum holding period (which ranges from one year to four years) pay a contingent deferred sales charge ("CDSC") to AllianceBernstein Investments. We expect to recover sales commissions for back-end load shares over periods not exceeding five and one-half years through receipt of a CDSC and/or the higher ongoing distribution services fees we receive from holders of back-end load shares. Payments of sales commissions made to financial intermediaries in connection with the sale of back-end load shares under the System, net of CDSC received of $21.7 million, $14.2 million and $20.0 million, totaled approximately $75.7 million, $21.5 million and $33.4 million during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We have not offered back-end load shares to new investors in U.S. Funds since January 31, 2009. However, our Non-U.S. Funds continue to offer back-end load shares.

        The rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ("FINRA") effectively cap the aggregate sales charges that may be received from each open-end U.S. Fund by AllianceBernstein Investments at 6.25% of cumulative gross sales (plus interest at the prime rate plus 1% per annum).

        Most open-end U.S. Funds have adopted a plan under Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act that allows the fund to pay, out of assets of the fund, distribution and service fees for the distribution and sale of its shares ("Rule 12b-1 fees"). The open-end AllianceBernstein Funds have entered into agreements with AllianceBernstein Investments under which they pay a distribution services fee to AllianceBernstein Investments. AllianceBernstein Investments has entered into selling and distribution agreements pursuant to which it pays sales commissions to the financial intermediaries that distribute our open-end U.S. Funds. These agreements are terminable by either party upon notice (generally 30 days) and do not obligate the financial intermediary to sell any specific amount of fund shares.

        In addition to Rule 12b-1 fees, AllianceBernstein Investments, at its own expense, currently provides additional payments under distribution services and educational support agreements to financial intermediaries that sell shares of our funds, a practice sometimes referred to as "revenue sharing." Although the amount of payments made in any given year may vary, the total amount paid to a financial intermediary in connection with the sale of shares of U.S. Funds generally will not exceed the sum of (i) 0.25% of the current year's fund sales by that firm, and (ii) 0.10% of average daily net assets attributable to that firm over the course of the year.


Table of Contents

        Financial intermediaries that provide accounting or record-keeping services with respect to their customers' investments in AllianceBernstein Funds may receive specified payments from these funds or from affiliates of AllianceBernstein, including AllianceBernstein Investor Services, Inc. (one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, "AllianceBernstein Investor Services") and AllianceBernstein Investments.

        During 2012, the 10 financial intermediaries responsible for the largest volume of sales of open-end AllianceBernstein Funds were responsible for 54% of such sales. Certain subsidiaries of AXA, including AXA Advisors, LLC ("AXA Advisors"), a wholly owned subsidiary of AXA Financial that utilizes members of AXA Equitable's insurance sales force as its registered representatives, were responsible for approximately 4%, 1% and 2% of total sales of shares of open-end AllianceBernstein Funds in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. None of these entities are under any obligation to sell a specific amount of AllianceBernstein Fund shares and each also sells shares of mutual funds sponsored by other affiliates and unaffiliated organizations.

        During 2012, Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, UBS AG and Citigroup (or their respective subsidiaries) were responsible for approximately 13%, 10% and 6%, respectively, of our open-end AllianceBernstein Fund sales. None of these companies are under any obligation to sell a specific amount of AllianceBernstein Fund shares and each also sells shares of mutual funds that it sponsors and that are sponsored by unaffiliated organizations.

        Based on industry sales data reported by the Investment Company Institute, our market share in the U.S. mutual fund industry was approximately 1% of total industry assets in the U.S. during 2012. The investment performance of the U.S. Funds is an important factor in the sale of their shares, but there are also other factors, including the level and quality of our shareholder services (see below) and the amounts and types of distribution assistance and administrative services payments we make to financial intermediaries, which we believe are competitive with others in the industry.

        AllianceBernstein Investor Services, which operates in San Antonio, Texas, provides transfer agency and related services for each open-end U.S. Fund (except the SCB Funds) and provides shareholder servicing for each open-end U.S. Fund's shareholder accounts (approximately 2.7 million accounts in total), for which it receives a monthly fee under servicing agreements with each open-end U.S. Fund based on the number and type of shareholder accounts serviced. Each servicing agreement must be approved annually by the relevant open-end U.S. Fund's board of directors or trustees, including a majority of the independent directors or trustees, and may be terminated by either party without penalty upon 60 days' notice.

        AllianceBernstein Funds utilize our personnel to perform most legal, clerical and accounting services. Payments to us by the U.S. Funds and certain Non-U.S. Funds for these services, which payments were approximately $5 million in 2012, $6 million in 2011 and $6 million in 2010, must be specifically approved in advance by each fund's board of directors or trustees.

        A unit of AllianceBernstein Luxembourg ("ABIS Lux") is the transfer agent for substantially all of the Non-U.S. Funds. ABIS Lux, based in Luxembourg and supported by operations in Singapore, Hong Kong and the United States, receives a monthly asset-based fee for its transfer agency services and a transaction-based fee under various services agreements with the Non-U.S. Funds. Each agreement may be terminated by either party upon 60 days' notice.


Table of Contents

        The following tables summarize Private Client Services AUM and revenues:


Private Client Services Assets Under Management
(by Investment Service)

 
 December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in millions)
  
  
 

Value Equity:

                

U.S. 

 $8,839 $9,912 $13,082  (10.8)% (24.2)%

Global and International

  7,487  7,971  11,714  (6.1) (32.0)
              

  16,326  17,883  24,796  (8.7) (27.9)
              

Growth Equity:

                

U.S. 

  7,751  7,735  9,626  0.2  (19.6)

Global and International

  5,967  5,859  7,492  1.8  (21.8)
              

  13,718  13,594  17,118  0.9  (20.6)
              

Fixed Income:

                

U.S. 

  29,797  32,147  32,485  (7.3) (1.0)

Global and International

  2,055  2,360  1,658  (12.9) 42.3 
              

  31,852  34,507  34,143  (7.7) 1.1 
              

Other(1):

                

U.S. 

  818  319  236  156.4  35.2 

Global and International

  3,092  3,115  1,753  (0.7) 77.7 
              

  3,910  3,434  1,989  13.9  72.6 
              

Total:

                

U.S. 

  47,205  50,113  55,429  (5.8) (9.6)

Global and International

  18,601  19,305  22,617  (3.6) (14.6)
              

Total

 $65,806 $69,418 $78,046  (5.2) (11.1)
              

(1)
Includes index, structured, asset allocation services and certain other alternative investments.

Table of Contents


Revenues From Private Client Services
(by Investment Service)

 
 Years Ended December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in thousands)
  
  
 

Investment Advisory and Services Fees:

                

Value Equity:

                

U.S. 

 $112,695 $134,149 $143,591  (16.0)% (6.6)%

Global and International

  83,671  104,260  116,254  (19.7) (10.3)
              

  196,366  238,409  259,845  (17.6) (8.2)
              

Growth Equity:

                

U.S. 

  97,981  108,269  114,081  (9.5) (5.1)

Global and International

  68,826  78,927  79,651  (12.8) (0.9)
              

  166,807  187,196  193,732  (10.9) (3.4)
              

Fixed Income:

                

U.S. 

  168,966  182,928  177,310  (7.6) 3.2 

Global and International

  14,193  12,166  7,141  16.7  70.4 
              

  183,159  195,094  184,451  (6.1) 5.8 
              

Other(1):

                

U.S. 

  5,246  2,160  292  142.9  639.7 

Global and International

  30,129  24,870  9,368  21.1  165.5 
              

  35,375  27,030  9,660  30.9  179.8 
              

Total Investment Advisory and Services Fees:

                

U.S. 

  384,888  427,506  435,274  (10.0) (1.8)

Global and International

  196,819  220,223  212,414  (10.6) 3.7 
              

  581,707  647,729  647,688  (10.2)  

Distribution Revenues(2)

  2,447  3,165  2,393  (22.7) 32.3 

Shareholder Servicing Fees(2)

  1,637  1,203  1,137  36.1  5.8 
              

Total

 $585,791 $652,097 $651,218  (10.2) 0.1 
              

(1)
Includes index, structured, asset allocation services and certain other alternative investments.

(2)
For a description of distribution revenues and shareholder servicing fees, see"Retail Services" above.

        Private client accounts generally are managed pursuant to a written investment advisory agreement among the client, AllianceBernstein and SCB LLC, which usually is terminable at any time or upon relatively short notice by any party. In general, these contracts may not be assigned without the consent of the client. We are compensated under these contracts by fees calculated as a percentage of AUM at a specific date or as a percentage of the value of average AUM for the applicable billing period, with these fees varying based on the types of investment services and the size of the account. The aggregate fees we charge for managing hedge funds may be higher than the fees we charge for managing other assets in private client accounts because hedge fund fees include performance-based fees, incentive allocations or carried interests in addition to base advisory fees. We are eligible to earn performance-based fees on approximately 3% of private client AUM, substantially all of which is held in hedge funds.


Table of Contents

        Revenues from Private Client Services represented approximately 21%, 24% and 22% of our company-wide net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Bernstein Research Services

        The following table summarizes Bernstein Research Services revenues:


Revenues From Bernstein Research Services

 
 Years Ended December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in thousands)
  
  
 

Bernstein Research Services

 $413,707 $437,414 $430,521  (5.4)% 1.6%
              

        We earn revenues for providing investment research to, and executing brokerage transactions for, institutional clients. These clients compensate us principally by directing SCB to execute brokerage transactions on their behalf, for which we earn commissions. These services accounted for approximately 15%, 16% and 15% of our company-wide net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

        Fee rates charged for brokerage transactions have declined significantly in recent years, but increases in transaction volume in both the U.S. and Europe have often offset these decreases.


Custody and Brokerage

Custody

        SCB LLC acts as custodian for the majority of AllianceBernstein's private client AUM and some of AllianceBernstein's institutional AUM. Other custodial arrangements are maintained by client-designated banks, trust companies, brokerage firms or custodians.

Brokerage

        AllianceBernstein generally has the discretion to select the broker-dealers that execute securities transactions for client accounts. When selecting brokers, we are required to obtain "best execution." Although there is no single statutory definition, SEC releases and other legal guidelines make clear that the duty to obtain best execution requires us to seek "the most advantageous terms reasonably available under the circumstances for a customer's account." The lowest possible commission, while very important, is not the only consideration. Generally, to achieve best execution, we consider factors such as order size and market depth, availability of competing markets and liquidity, trading characteristics of the security, financial responsibility of the broker-dealer, the broker's ability to address current market conditions, and the ability and willingness of the broker to commit capital by taking positions in order to execute transactions.

        While we select brokers primarily on the basis of their execution capabilities, we may also take into consideration the quality and amount of research services a broker provides to us for the benefit of our clients. These research services, which are paid for with client commissions and which we purchase to augment our own research capabilities, are governed by Section 28(e) of the Exchange Act. We use broker-dealers that provide these services in consideration for commissions paid for the execution of client trades, subject at all times to our duty to seek best execution, and with respect to which we reasonably conclude, in good faith, that the value of the execution and other services we receive from the broker-dealer is reasonable in relation to the amount of commissions paid. The commissions charged by these full-service brokers are generally higher than those charged by electronic trading networks and other "low-touch" trading venues.


Table of Contents

        We regularly execute transactions for our private clients through SCB, our affiliated broker-dealers, because these clients have generally subscribed to an all-inclusive package of services that includes brokerage, custody and investment advice. We sometimes execute institutional client transactions through SCB LLC or SCBL. We do so only when our clients have consented to our use of affiliated broker-dealers or we are otherwise permitted to do so, and only when we can execute these transactions in accordance with applicable law (i.e., our obligation to obtain "best execution").

        We may use third-party broker-dealers to execute client transactions that also sell shares of AllianceBernstein Funds or third party funds we sub-advise; however, we prohibit our investment professionals who place trades from considering these other relationships or the sale of fund shares as a factor when selecting broker-dealers.

        Our Brokerage Allocation Committee has principal oversight responsibility for evaluating equity-related brokerage matters, including how to use research services we receive in a manner that is in the best interests of our clients and consistent with current regulatory requirements.

Service Marks

        We have registered a number of service marks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and various foreign trademark offices, including the combination of an "AB" design logo with the mark "AllianceBernstein."

        In connection with the Bernstein Transaction, we acquired all of the rights and title in, and to, the Bernstein service marks, including the mark "Bernstein."

Regulation

        Virtually all aspects of our business are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations, rules of various securities regulators and exchanges, and laws in the foreign countries in which our subsidiaries conduct business. These laws and regulations are primarily intended to protect clients and fund shareholders and generally grant supervisory agencies broad administrative powers, including the power to limit or restrict the carrying on of business for failure to comply with such laws and regulations. Possible sanctions that may be imposed include the suspension of individual employees, limitations on engaging in business for specific periods, the revocation of the registration as an investment adviser or broker-dealer, censures and fines.

        AllianceBernstein, Holding, the General Partner, SCB LLC, AllianceBernstein Global Derivatives Corporation (an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein, "Global Derivatives") and Alliance Corporate Finance Group Incorporated (an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein) are registered with the SEC as investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act. SCB LLC and Global Derivatives are also registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") as commodity pool operators and commodity trading advisers. As of January 1, 2013, AllianceBernstein was also registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator and commodity trading adviser.

        Each U.S. Fund is registered with the SEC under the Investment Company Act and the shares of most U.S. Funds are qualified for sale in all states in the United States and the District of Columbia, except for U.S. Funds offered only to residents of a particular state. AllianceBernstein Investor Services is registered with the SEC as a transfer and servicing agent.

        SCB LLC and AllianceBernstein Investments are registered with the SEC as broker-dealers, and both are members of FINRA. SCB LLC is also a member of the NYSE and other principal U.S. exchanges. SCBL is a broker regulated by the Financial Services Authority of the United Kingdom ("FSA") and is a member of the London Stock Exchange. SCB Hong Kong is regulated by the Hong


Table of Contents

Kong Securities and Futures Commission ("SFC") and is an exchange participant of The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited.

        AllianceBernstein Trust Company, LLC ("ABTC"), a wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein, is a non-depository trust company chartered under New Hampshire law as a limited liability company. ABTC is authorized to act as trustee, executor, transfer agent, assignee, receiver, custodian, investment adviser and in any other capacity authorized for a trust company under New Hampshire law. As a state-chartered trust company exercising fiduciary powers, ABTC must comply with New Hampshire laws applicable to trust company operations (such as New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated), certain federal laws (such as ERISA and sections of the Bank Secrecy Act), and New Hampshire banking laws. The primary fiduciary activities of ABTC consist of serving as trustee to a series of collective investment funds, the investors of which currently are defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans.

        Holding Units are listed on the NYSE and trade publicly under the ticker symbol "AB." As an NYSE-listed company, Holding is subject to applicable regulations promulgated by the NYSE.

        Our relationships with AXA and its subsidiaries are subject to applicable provisions of the insurance laws and regulations of New York and other states. Under such laws and regulations, the terms of certain investment advisory and other agreements we enter into with AXA or its subsidiaries are required to be fair and equitable, charges or fees for services performed must be reasonable, and, in some cases, are subject to regulatory approval.

        Some of our subsidiaries are subject to the oversight of regulatory authorities in Europe, including the FSA in the U.K., in Asia, including the Financial Services Agency in Japan, the SFC in Hong Kong and the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and in Canada, including the Ontario Securities Commission and other Canadian provincial regulators. While the requirements of these foreign regulators are often comparable to the requirements of the SEC and other U.S. regulators, they are sometimes more restrictive and may cause us to incur substantial expenditures of time and money in our efforts to comply. As of December 31, 2012, each of our subsidiaries subject to a minimum net capital requirement satisfied the applicable requirement.

Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act

        AllianceBernstein, Holding and their global subsidiaries had no transactions or activities requiring disclosure under the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act ("Iran Act"), nor were they involved in the AXA Group insurance policiesdescribed immediately below.

        The non-U.S. based subsidiaries of AXA, our parent company, operate in compliance with applicable laws and regulations of the various jurisdictions where they operate, including applicable international (United Nations and European Union) laws and regulations. While AXA Group companies based and operating outside the United States generally are not subject to U.S. law, as an international group, AXA has in place policies and standards (including the AXA Group International Sanctions Policy) that apply to all AXA Group companies worldwide and often impose requirements that go well beyond local law. For additional information regarding AXA, seeNote 1 to the audited consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus.

        AXA has reported to us that two insurance policies underwritten by one of AXA's European insurance subsidiaries, AXA France IARD, that were in-force during the second quarter of 2013 potentially come within the scope of the disclosure requirements of the Iran Act. Each of these insurance policies relates to property and casualty insurance (homeowners, auto, accident, liability and/or fraud policies) covering property located in France where the insured is a company or other entity that may have, direct or indirect, ties to the Government of Iran, including Iranian entities designated under Executive Orders 13224 and 13382. AXA France IARD is a French company, based


Table of Contents

in Paris, which is licensed to operate in France. The annual aggregate revenue AXA derives from these two policies is approximately $10,000 and the related profit, which is difficult to calculate with precision, is estimated to be $5,000.

        Following additional diligence, AXA France IARD has identified eight additional insurance policies that were originally written during 2010 and 2011 that remained in effect during the second quarter of 2013 and may require reporting. These eight policies involve auto or property insurance provided to the Iranian delegation to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in Paris. The annual aggregate revenue AXA derives from all eight policies is approximately $8,000 and the related net profit, which is difficult to calculate with precision, is estimated to be $4,000.

        Lastly, AXA has informed us that, during the second quarter of 2013, AXA Konzern AG, an AXA European insurance subsidiary, provided property insurance to MCS International GMBH ("MCS"). MCS was listed as a designated SDN by the Office of Foreign Assets Control during the second quarter of 2013, after the insurance policy had been completed. The premium received by AXA in respect of this insurance policy is approximately $15,000 and the related net profit, which is difficult to calculate with precision, is estimated to be $8,000.

        As of the date of this report, AXA France IARD and AXA Konzern AG have taken actions necessary to terminate coverage under all 11 insurance policies. The aggregate premium for these 11 policies was approximately $33,000, representing less than .00003% of AXA's consolidated revenues, which are in excess of $100 billion. The net profit attributable to these 11 insurance policies is difficult to calculate with precision, but AXA estimates its net profit attributable to all 11 of these policies, in the aggregate, was approximately $17,000, representing less than .0004% of AXA's aggregate net profit.

Taxes

        Holding, having elected under Section 7704(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"), to be subject to a 3.5% federal tax on partnership gross income from the active conduct of a trade or business, is a "grandfathered" publicly traded partnership for federal income tax purposes. Holding is also subject to the 4.0% New York City unincorporated business tax ("UBT"), net of credits for UBT paid by AllianceBernstein. In order to preserve Holding's status as a "grandfathered" publicly traded partnership for federal income tax purposes, management ensures that Holding does not directly or indirectly (through AllianceBernstein) enter into a substantial new line of business. A "new line of business" includes any business that is not closely related to AllianceBernstein's historical business of providing research and diversified investment management and related services to its clients. A new line of business is "substantial" when a partnership derives more than 15% of its gross income from, or uses more than 15% of its total assets to support, the new line of business.

        AllianceBernstein is a private partnership for federal income tax purposes and, accordingly, is not subject to federal and state corporate income taxes. However, AllianceBernstein is subject to the 4.0% UBT. Domestic corporate subsidiaries of AllianceBernstein, which are subject to federal, state and local income taxes, generally are included in the filing of a consolidated federal income tax return with separate state and local income tax returns also being filed. Foreign corporate subsidiaries generally are subject to taxes at higher rates in the foreign jurisdictions where they are located so, as our business increasingly operates in countries other than the United States, our effective tax rate is expected to increase over time.

History and Structure

        We have been in the investment research and management business for more than 40 years. Alliance Capital was founded in 1971 when the investment management department of Donaldson,


Table of Contents

Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc. (since November 2000, a part of Credit Suisse Group) merged with the investment advisory business of Moody's Investor Services, Inc. Bernstein was founded in 1967.

        In April 1988, Holding "went public" as a master limited partnership. Holding Units, which trade under the ticker symbol "AB," have been listed on the NYSE since that time.

        In October 1999, Holding reorganized by transferring its business and assets to AllianceBernstein, a newly formed operating partnership, in exchange for all of the AllianceBernstein Units ("Reorganization"). Since the date of the Reorganization, AllianceBernstein has conducted the business formerly conducted by Holding and Holding's activities have consisted of owning AllianceBernstein Units and engaging in related activities. As stated above, Holding Units trade publicly; AllianceBernstein Units do not trade publicly and are subject to significant restrictions on transfer. The General Partner is the general partner of both AllianceBernstein and Holding.

        In October 2000, our two legacy firms, Alliance Capital and Bernstein, combined, bringing together Alliance Capital's expertise in growth equity and corporate fixed income investing, and its family of retail mutual funds, with Bernstein's expertise in value equity and tax-exempt fixed income management, and its private client and Bernstein Research Services businesses. For additional details about this business combination, seeNote 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus.

        As of December 31, 2012, the condensed ownership structure of AllianceBernstein was as follows:

GRAPHIC


(1)
Direct and indirect ownership including unallocated Holding Units held in a consolidated rabbi trust primarily used to fund our long-term incentive compensation plans and for other corporate purposes.

        The ownership of Holding by AllianceBernstein directors, officers and employees increased to 42.2% as of December 31, 2012 from 35.1% as of December 31, 2011, with a corresponding decrease in public ownership. This shift reflects our purchase of approximately 12.3 million Holding Units on the open market during 2012, helping to fund anticipated obligations under our incentive compensation award program and for other corporate purposes. Any future restricted Holding Unit issuances as long-term incentive compensation will further increase employee ownership and decrease public ownership.


Table of Contents

        The General Partner, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of AXA, owns 100,000 general partnership units in Holding and a 1% general partnership interest in AllianceBernstein. Including these general partnership interests, AXA, through certain of its subsidiaries, had an approximate 65.5% economic interest in AllianceBernstein as of December 31, 2012.

        AXA and its subsidiaries own all of the issued and outstanding shares of the common stock of AXA Financial. AXA Financial indirectly owns all of the issued and outstanding shares of AXA Equitable.

        AXA, asociété anonyme organized under the laws of France, is the holding company for an international group of insurance and related financial services companies engaged in the financial protection and wealth management businesses. AXA's operations are diverse geographically, with major operations in Western Europe, North America and the Asia/Pacific regions and, to a lesser extent, in other regions including the Middle East and Africa. AXA has five operating business segments: life and savings, property and casualty, international insurance, asset management and other financial services.

Competition

        The financial services industry is intensely competitive and new entrants are continually attracted to it. No single or small group of competitors is dominant in the industry.

        We compete in all aspects of our business with numerous investment management firms, mutual fund sponsors, brokerage and investment banking firms, insurance companies, banks, savings and loan associations, and other financial institutions that often provide investment products that have similar features and objectives as those we offer. Our competitors offer a wide range of financial services to the same customers that we seek to serve. Some of our competitors are larger, have a broader range of product choices and investment capabilities, conduct business in more markets, and have substantially greater resources than we do. These factors may place us at a competitive disadvantage, and we can give no assurance that our strategies and efforts to maintain and enhance our current client relationships, and create new ones, will be successful.

        AXA and its subsidiaries provide financial services, some of which compete with those we offer. The AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement specifically allows AXA Financial and its subsidiaries (other than the General Partner) to compete with AllianceBernstein and to exploit opportunities that may be available to us. AXA, AXA Financial, AXA Equitable and certain of their respective subsidiaries have substantially greater financial resources than we do and are not obligated to provide resources to us.

        To grow our business, we must be able to compete effectively for AUM. Key competitive factors include:


Table of Contents

        Increased competition could reduce the demand for our products and services, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and business prospects.

        Competition is an important risk that our business faces and should be considered along with the other risk factors we discuss in "Risk Factors—Risks Related to AllianceBernstein" above.

Quarterly Financial Data

        The following table sets forth certain financial information for the quarters ended March 31, June 30 and JuneSeptember 30, 2013.


 Quarters Ended 2013  Quarters Ended 2013 

 June 30 March 31  September 30 June 30 March 31 

 (in thousands, except
per unit amounts)

  (in thousands, except
per unit amounts)

  
 

Net revenues

 $734,275 $709,122  $706,078 $734,275 $709,122 

Net income (loss) attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $120,714 $114,516  $99,948 $120,714 $114,516 

Basic net income (loss) per AllianceBernstein Unit(1)

 $0.43 $0.41  $0.37 $0.43 $0.41 

Diluted net income (loss) per AllianceBernstein Unit(1)

 $0.43 $0.41  $0.37 $0.43 $0.41 

Cash distributions per AllianceBernstein Unit(2)

 $0.44 $0.41  $0.46 $0.44 $0.41 

(1)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit are computed independently for each of the periods presented. Accordingly, the sum of the quarterly net income (loss) per unit amounts may not agree to the total for the year.

(2)
Declared and paid during the following quarter.

Other Information

        We file or furnish annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and other reports required to comply with federal securities laws. The public may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC in the SEC's conventional reading rooms, which are located within the SEC's Headquarters Office at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of these rooms by calling the SEC at (202) 942-8088. The SEC also maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file with the SEC.

        We maintain an Internet site (http://www.alliancebernstein.com). The portion of the site at "Investor & Media Relations" and "Reports & SEC Filings" contains links to our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, Section 16 beneficial ownership reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5, registration statements on Form S-8, proxy statements and amendments to such filings. These reports are available through the site free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.


Properties

        Our principal executive offices at 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York are occupied pursuant to a lease expiring in 2019 with options to extend to 2029. At this location, we currently lease 1,033,984 square feet of space, within which we currently occupy approximately 629,472 square feet of space and have sub-let (or are seeking to sub-let) approximately 404,512 square feet of space. We also lease approximately 312,301 square feet of space at 135 West 50th Street, New York, New York under a lease expiring in 2019 with options to extend to 2029. Within our leased space


Table of Contents

at 135 West 50th Street, we currently occupy approximately 4,132 square feet of space and have sub-let (or are seeking to sub-let) approximately 308,169 square feet of space.

        In addition, we lease approximately 263,083 square feet of space at One North Lexington, White Plains, New York under a lease expiring in 2021 with options to extend to 2031. At this location, we currently occupy approximately 136,687 square feet of space and have sub-let (or are seeking to sub-let) approximately 126,396 square feet of space.

        AllianceBernstein Investments and AllianceBernstein Investor Services lease 92,067 square feet of space in San Antonio, Texas under a lease expiring in 2019 with options to extend to 2029. At this location, these subsidiaries currently occupy approximately 59,004 square feet of space and have sub-let (or are seeking to sub-let) approximately 33,063 square feet of space.

        We also lease space in 19 other cities in the United States.

        Our subsidiaries lease space in 25 cities outside the United States, the most significant of which are in London, England under leases expiring between 2013 and 2022, and in Tokyo, Japan under a lease expiring in 2018. In London, we currently lease 110,865 square feet of space, within which we currently occupy approximately 57,567 square feet of space and have sub-let (or are seeking to sub-let) approximately 53,298 square feet of space. In Tokyo, we currently lease and occupy approximately 34,615 square feet of space.


Legal Proceedings

        With respect to all significant litigation matters, we consider the likelihood of a negative outcome. If we determine the likelihood of a negative outcome is probable, and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, we record an estimated loss for the expected outcome of the litigation. If the likelihood of a negative outcome is reasonably possible and we are able to determine an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss in excess of amounts already accrued, if any, we disclose that fact together with the estimate of the possible loss or range of loss. However, it is often difficult to predict the outcome or estimate a possible loss or range of loss because litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, particularly when plaintiffs allege substantial or indeterminate damages, the litigation is in its early stages, or when the litigation is highly complex or broad in scope. In such cases, we disclose that we are unable to predict the outcome or estimate a possible loss or range of loss.

        During the first quarter of 2012, we received a legal letter of claim (the "Letter of Claim") sent on behalf of a former European pension fund client, alleging that AllianceBernstein Limited (a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of ours organized in the U.K.) was negligent and failed to meet certain applicable standards of care with respect to the initial investment in and management of a £500 million portfolio of U.S. mortgage-backed securities. The alleged damages range between $177 million and $234 million, plus compound interest on an alleged $125 million of realized losses in the portfolio. We believe that any losses to this client resulted from adverse developments in the U.S. housing and mortgage market that precipitated the financial crisis in 2008 and not any negligence or failure on our part. We believe that we have strong defenses to these claims, which are set forth in our October 12, 2012 response to the Letter of Claim, and will defend this matter vigorously. Currently, we are unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss because the matter remains in its early stages.

        In addition to the Letter of Claim, we are involved in various other matters, including regulatory inquiries, administrative proceedings and litigation, some of which allege significant damages.

        In management's opinion, an adequate accrual has been made as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 to provide for any probable losses regarding any litigation matters for which we can reasonably estimate an amount of loss. It is reasonably possible that we could incur additional losses pertaining to these matters, but currently we are unable to estimate any such additional losses.


Table of Contents

        Management, after consultation with legal counsel, currently believes that the outcome of any matter that is pending or threatened, or all of them combined, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. However, as any inquiry, proceeding or litigation has an element of uncertainty, management cannot determine whether further developments relating to any matter that is pending or threatened, or all of them combined, will have a material adverse effect on our results of operation, financial condition or liquidity in any future reporting period.


Management's Discussion and Analysis

        The secondDuring the third quarter of 2013, finished very differently than it began. The robust equity markets and strong demand for fixed income we experienced early in the second quarter gave way to equity market volatility and high investor anxiety over the outlook for interest rates, particularly following the late-May release of U.S. Federal Reserve meeting minutes suggesting a potential easing of bond buybacks. As a result, mortgage rates rose quickly, bond flowsour net outflows turned negative and equity flows declined, as investors took to the sidelines. Despite a difficult June, we maintained momentum in our Institutions channel, where gross sales rose for a third consecutive quarter, to a 12-quarter high. However, flows to our Retail channel were dramatically affected, principally Fixed Income flows in the Asia ex-Japan region, and we experienced net outflows for the first time since the third quarter of 2012, as uncertainties over the direction of U.S. interest rates, the next Federal Reserve Chairman, the timing for tapering of bond buybacks by the Federal Reserve and a looming debt ceiling debate created volatile global debt and equity markets during the quarter. These market dynamics most significantly affected flows in six quarters.

        Evenour Institutional and Retail channels. By contrast, there was sequential gross sales growth in our Private Client channel (which improved sequential net outflows), with these near-term challenges,clients responding favorably to our second quarter financial results were strong, and we continued to make progress on our long-term strategy to deliver for clients with our investment performance, diversify and globalize our business, innovate with ourbroader set of offerings and strengthen our financials. The vast majority of our Fixed Income assets have outperformed for the three- and five-year time periods, and we're building better track records in equities. Our Global and U.S. Strategic Value strategies outperformed their respective benchmarks by more than 500 basis points for the one-year period through June. International Discovery and Emerging Markets Growth have outperformed their respective benchmarks for the year-to-date, one- and three-year periods. In addition, Small and SMID Cap Value and Select U.S. Equity are top performers across various time periods. Improved investment performance is fueling strong client interest globally.improved equity portfolio returns.

        Our total assets under management ("AUM") as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 were $434.6$445.2 billion, down $8.6up $10.6 billion, or 1.9%, compared to March 31, 2013, and up $27.3 billion, or 6.7%2.4%, compared to June 30, 2013, and up $26.3 billion, or 6.3%, compared to September 30, 2012. During the secondthird quarter of 2013, AUM decreasedincreased as a result of market depreciationappreciation of $8.8$15.4 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $4.8 billion (Institutional outflows of $3.5 billion, Private Client outflows of $0.7 billion and Retail outflows of $0.6 billion). During the twelve months ended September 30, 2013, AUM increased as a result of market appreciation of $23.3 billion and net inflows of $0.2$3.0 billion (Institutional inflows of $4.7$7.5 billion and Retail inflows of $1.7 billion, partially offset by Retail outflows of $3.2 billion and Private Client outflows of $1.3$6.2 billion).

        Institutional AUM decreased $1.2increased $3.4 billion, or 0.5%1.6%, to $223.9$227.3 billion during the third quarter of 2013, due to market appreciation of $6.9 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $3.5 billion. Redemptions and terminations decreased 19.1% sequentially from $3.2 billion during the second quarter of 2013 to $2.6 billion during the third quarter of 2013. However, gross sales decreased 40.7% sequentially from $7.7 billion to $4.5 billion and there were $5.4 billion of negative cash flows. During the third quarter, our Institutional sales were strongest in the Americas and Asia ex-Japan regions, where we won several equity and fixed income mandates.

        Retail AUM increased $5.4 billion, or 3.8%, to $149.8 billion during the third quarter of 2013, due to market depreciationappreciation of $5.9$6.0 billion, only partially offset by net inflowsoutflows of $4.7$0.6 billion. Gross sales increased 5.8% sequentially from $7.3 billion during the first quarter of 2013 to $7.7 billion during the second quarter of 2013. Additionally, redemptionsRedemptions and terminations decreased 10.8%28.7% sequentially from $3.6 billion to $3.2 billion. Institutional gross sales during the quarter were most significant in the Europe, Middle East and Africa region and Japan, and we secured new mandates in such diverse areas as Real Estate, Global Credit, U.S. Investment Grade, Emerging Market Multi-Asset and Select U.S. Equity. The pipeline of awarded but unfunded Institutional mandates decreased sequentially from $7.8 billion to $4.8 billion at June 30, 2013, as new fixed income and equity additions were more than offset by fundings and revisions during the quarter.

        Retail AUM decreased $6.0 billion, or 4.0% to $144.4$15.9 billion during the second quarter of 2013 to $11.3 billion during the third quarter of 2013. Our sales were strong in the U.S., where we had notable success with Select U.S. Equity Long/Short and U.S. High Income, but overall gross sales decreased 13.9% sequentially from $14.4 billion to $12.4 billion.

        Private Client AUM increased $1.8 billion, or 2.6%, to $68.1 billion during the third quarter of 2013, due to market appreciation of $2.5 billion, partially offset by net outflows of $3.2$0.7 billion. Gross sales increased 38.7% sequentially from $1.2 billion during the second quarter of 2013 to $1.8 billion during the third quarter of 2013, resulting in a 40.0% decrease in net outflows.

        Bernstein Research Services revenue for the third quarter of 2013 was $107.3 million, up $6.7 million, or 6.7%, compared to the third quarter of 2012, as a result of improving market volume, especially in Europe and market depreciationAsia.

        Net revenues for the third quarter of $2.8 billion. Redemptions and2013 decreased $2.1 million, or 0.3%, to $706.1 million from $708.2 million in the third quarter of 2012. The decrease primarily resulted from lower performance-


Table of Contents

terminations increased 26.9% sequentially from $12.5 billionbased fees of $39.6 million (due to $15.9 billion. Additionally, gross sales decreased 1.4% sequentially from $14.6 billion during the first quarterrecognition of 2013 to $14.4 billion during the second quarter$39.6 million of 2013. However, we had our best first half for gross sales since 2000, despite reduced sales during June 2013, principallyperformance-based fees in the Asia ex-Japan region. Milestones for the quarter include a record-breaking local market launch of our Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund in Taiwan and our Fixed Income SMA U.S. platform passing the $1 billion AUM mark.

        Private Client AUM decreased $1.4 billion, or 2.1%, to $66.3 billion during the second quarter of 2013, due to net outflows of $1.3 billion and market depreciation of $0.1 billion. Gross sales decreased 30.5% sequentially from $1.8 billion during the first quarter of 2013 to $1.2 billion during the second quarter of 2013. However, redemptions and terminations decreased 19.7% sequentially from $2.5 billion to $2.0 billion. In addition, our equity portfolios have performed well for conservative, moderate and growth-oriented clients through the first half of 2013, with particular strength in our Strategic Equities and fund-of-hedge-funds Registered Investment Company offerings.

        Bernstein Research Services revenue for the second quarter of 2013 was $114.8 million, up $11.8 million, or 11.4%, compared to the secondthird quarter of 2012 as a resultupon liquidation of strong growth in Europe and Asia.

        Net revenues for the second quarter increased $92.2 million, or 14.3%our Public-Private Investment Partnership fund), to $734.3 million from $642.1 million in the second quarter of 2012. The most significant contributors to the increase werepartially offset by higher base advisory fees of $33.5$24.6 million, higher distribution revenues of $23.7 million, higher investment gains of $19.3$8.4 million and higher Bernstein Research Services revenues of $11.8$6.7 million. Operating expenses for the secondthird quarter of 2013 increased $34.2decreased $166.5 million, or 6.1%21.8%, to $597.6$597.5 million from $563.4$764.0 million in the secondthird quarter of 20122012. The decrease was due primarily to higher employee compensation and benefitslower real estate charges of $33.7$144.0 million and lower general and administrative expenses of $30.9 million, partially offset by higher promotion and servicing expenses of $29.9 million, partially offset$7.0 million. Finally, by lower general and administrativeclosely monitoring expenses of $24.8 million and lower real estate charges of $4.9 million. Operating income forduring the second quarter, of 2013 increased $58.0 million, or 73.5%,we achieved a 22.6% adjusted operating margin, up 2.4 percentage points from the second quarter of 2012,same period last year.

Pending Acquisition

        As described elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus, in August 2013, we announced that AllianceBernstein and our operating margin increased from 12.5% (16.1% onW.P. Stewart entered into a definitive agreement whereby AllianceBernstein will acquire W.P. Stewart, an adjusted basis)equity investment manager that manages approximately $2 billion in U.S., Global and EAFE concentrated growth equity strategies for institutional and retail clients, primarily in the second quarterU.S. and Europe.

        We anticipate that the transaction will close in December 2013. The acquisition will not have a material impact on our 2013 financial condition or results of operations.

Fourth Quarter 2013 Holding Trading Window

        Our trading window for employees to trade in Holding Units (NYSE: AB) will temporarily close from Monday, December 2, 2013 through (and including) Thursday, December 5, 2013, during which period we anticipate that most, if not all, incentive compensation award program ("ICAP") Holding Unit distributions (representing portions of ICAP awards made in previous years scheduled to vest on December 1, 2013) will be delivered to ICAP participants. We anticipate that the trading window will re-open from Friday, December 6, 2013 through (and including) Monday, December 16, 2013, during which period employees will be permitted to trade in Holding Units. Sales of Holding Units by employees during this period, depending upon the volume of such sales, may cause downward pressure on the price of a Holding Unit. In 2012, approximately 3.8 million Holding Units were delivered to 17.7% (22.2%ICAP participants, of which approximately 31% were sold before the trading window closed on December 17, 2012. On December 1, 2013, approximately 4.4 million Holding Units are scheduled to be delivered to ICAP participants.

MONY

        On October 1, 2013, AXA completed the sale of one of its subsidiaries, MONY Life Insurance Company ("MONY"), to an adjusted basis)unaffiliated third party. As a result, we lost approximately $7 billion in MONY fixed income assets during October, which represented most of the second quarterapproximately $8 billion in total assets we managed for them as of September 30, 2013. The loss of these assets will not have a material impact on our revenues as these are low fee assets. We expect to ultimately lose the remainder of the assets though the timing is uncertain.

Assets Under Management

        During the first quarter of 2013, we altered our AUM disclosure in order to provide greater transparency regarding the impact of prevailing industry trends on our asset mix and fee realization rate. The new disclosure addresses the long-term industry-wide trend of increasing asset flows into passive products by providing a breakout of both equity and fixed income AUM into actively managed assets and passively managed assets, which include index, enhanced index and factor-based strategies. In addition, in acknowledgement of our significant growth in fixed income assets over the past several


Table of Contents

years and the current size of the business, we now break out our active fixed income AUM into taxable and tax-exempt assets.

        Assets under management by distribution channel were as follows:


 As of June 30,  
  
  As of September 30,  
  
 

 2013 2012 $ Change % Change  2013 2012 $ Change % Change 

 (in billions)
  (in billions)
 

Institutions

 $223.9 $214.9 $9.0 4.2% $227.3 $214.4 $12.9 6.0%

Retail

 144.4 124.8 19.6 15.7  149.8 136.4 13.4 9.8 

Private Client

 66.3 67.6 (1.3) (1.9) 68.1 68.1   
                  

Total

 $434.6 $407.3 $27.3 6.7  $445.2 $418.9 $26.3 6.3 
                  

Table of Contents

        Assets under management by investment service were as follows:


 As of June 30,  
  
  As of September 30,  
  
 

 2013 2012 $ Change % Change  2013 2012 $ Change % Change 

 (in billions)
  (in billions)
 

Equity

  

Actively Managed

 $96.2 $107.4 $(11.2) (10.4)% $100.7 $100.3 $0.4 0.4%

Passively Managed(1)

 44.4 35.1 9.3 26.6  46.2 36.7 9.5 25.9 
                  

Total Equity

 140.6 142.5 (1.9) (1.3) 146.9 137.0 9.9 7.2 
                  

Fixed Income

  

Actively Managed

  

Taxable

 219.4 197.1 22.3 11.3  219.4 212.2 7.2 3.4 

Tax-exempt

 29.9 31.0 (1.1) (3.6) 29.4 31.6 (2.2) (6.7)
                  

 249.3 228.1 21.2 9.3  248.8 243.8 5.0 2.1 
                  

Passively Managed(1)

 8.2 5.3 2.9 54.3  9.3 6.8 2.5 35.7 
                  

Total Fixed Income

 257.5 233.4 24.1 10.3  258.1 250.6 7.5 3.0 
                  

Other(2)

 36.5 31.4 5.1 16.1  40.2 31.3 8.9 28.5 
                  

Total

 $434.6 $407.3 $27.3 6.7  $445.2 $418.9 $26.3 6.3 
                  

(1)
Includes index, enhanced index and factor-based strategies.

(2)
Includes asset allocation services and certain other alternative investments.

Table of Contents

        Changes in assets under management for the three-month, six-monthnine-month and twelve-month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 were as follows:


 Distribution Channel  Distribution Channel 

 Institutions Retail Private
Client
 Total  Institutions Retail Private
Client
 Total 

 (in billions)
  (in billions)
 

Balance as of March 31, 2013

 $225.1 $150.4 $67.7 $443.2 

Balance as of June 30, 2013

 $223.9 $144.4 $66.3 $434.6 

Long-term flows:

  

Sales/new accounts

 7.7 14.4 1.2 23.3  4.5 12.4 1.8 18.7 

Redemptions/terminations

 (3.2) (15.9) (2.0) (21.1) (2.6) (11.3) (2.0) (15.9)

Cash flow/unreinvested dividends

 0.2 (1.7) (0.5) (2.0) (5.4) (1.7) (0.5) (7.6)
                  

Net long-term inflows (outflows)

 4.7 (3.2) (1.3) 0.2 

Market (depreciation)

 (5.9) (2.8) (0.1) (8.8)

Net long-term (outflows)

 (3.5) (0.6) (0.7) (4.8)

Market appreciation

 6.9 6.0 2.5 15.4 
                  

Net change

 (1.2) (6.0) (1.4) (8.6) 3.4 5.4 1.8 10.6 
                  

Balance as of June 30, 2013

 $223.9 $144.4 $66.3 $434.6 

Balance as of September 30, 2013

 $227.3 $149.8 $68.1 $445.2 
                  

Balance as of December 31, 2012

 $219.8 $144.4 $65.8 $430.0  $219.8 $144.4 $65.8 $430.0 

Long-term flows:

 

Sales/new accounts

 14.9 29.0 3.1 47.0 

Redemptions/terminations

 (6.7) (28.4) (4.6) (39.7)

Cash flow/unreinvested dividends

 (0.2) (3.6) (0.7) (4.5)
         

Net long-term inflows (outflows)

 8.0 (3.0) (2.2) 2.8 

Market (depreciation) appreciation

 (3.9) 3.0 2.7 1.8 
         

Net change

 4.1  0.5 4.6 
         

Balance as of June 30, 2013

 $223.9 $144.4 $66.3 $434.6 
         

Balance as of June 30, 2012

 $214.9 $124.8 $67.6 $407.3 

Long-term flows:

  

Sales/new accounts

 26.8 60.6 5.1 92.5  19.4 41.4 4.9 65.7 

Redemptions/terminations

 (24.0) (46.0) (10.1) (80.1) (9.3) (39.7) (6.7) (55.7)

Cash flow/unreinvested dividends

 0.4 (7.2) (2.1) (8.9) (5.6) (5.3) (1.1) (12.0)
                  

Net long-term inflows (outflows)

 3.2 7.4 (7.1) 3.5  4.5 (3.6) (2.9) (2.0)

Market appreciation

 5.8 12.2 5.8 23.8  3.0 9.0 5.2 17.2 
                  

Net change

 9.0 19.6 (1.3) 27.3  7.5 5.4 2.3 15.2 
                  

Balance as of June 30, 2013

 $223.9 $144.4 $66.3 $434.6 

Balance as of September 30, 2013

 $227.3 $149.8 $68.1 $445.2 
                  

Balance as of September 30, 2012

 $214.4 $136.4 $68.1 $418.9 

Long-term flows:

 

Sales/new accounts

 26.2 57.8 5.8 89.8 

Redemptions/terminations

 (14.6) (48.7) (9.9) (73.2)

Cash flow/unreinvested dividends

 (4.1) (7.4) (2.1) (13.6)
         

Net long-term inflows (outflows)

 7.5 1.7 (6.2) 3.0 

Transfers

 0.1 (0.1)   

Market appreciation

 5.3 11.8 6.2 23.3 
         

Net change

 12.9 13.4  26.3 
         

Balance as of September 30, 2013

 $227.3 $149.8 $68.1 $445.2 
         

Table of Contents



 Investment Service  Investment Service 

 Equity
Actively
Managed
 Equity Passively
Managed(1)
 Fixed
Income
Actively
Managed—
Taxable
 Fixed Income
Actively
Managed—
Tax-Exempt
 Fixed
Income
Passively
Managed(1)
 Other(2) Total  Equity
Actively
Managed
 Equity Passively
Managed(1)
 Fixed
Income
Actively
Managed—
Taxable
 Fixed Income
Actively
Managed—
Tax-Exempt
 Fixed
Income
Passively
Managed(1)
 Other(2) Total 

 (in billions)
  (in billions)
 

Balance as of March 31, 2013

 $98.8 $43.8 $226.0 $30.9 $8.3 $35.4 $443.2 

Balance as of June 30, 2013

 $96.2 $44.4 $219.4 $29.9 $8.2 $36.5 $434.6 

Long-term flows:

  

Sales/new accounts

 4.0 0.1 17.2 1.4 0.2 0.4 23.3  4.3 2.1 9.5 1.2 0.9 0.7 18.7 

Redemptions/terminations

 (5.7) (0.4) (13.4) (1.2) (0.2) (0.2) (21.1) (4.8)  (9.3) (1.3) (0.2) (0.3) (15.9)

Cash flow/unreinvested dividends

 (1.6) 0.3 (1.4) (0.4) 0.1 1.0 (2.0) (2.6) (3.3) (3.0) (0.4) 0.2 1.5 (7.6)
                              

Net long-term (outflows) inflows

 (3.3)  2.4 (0.2) 0.1 1.2 0.2  (3.1) (1.2) (2.8) (0.5) 0.9 1.9 (4.8)

Market appreciation (depreciation)

 0.7 0.6 (9.0) (0.8) (0.2) (0.1) (8.8)

Market appreciation

 7.6 3.0 2.8  0.2 1.8 15.4 
                              

Net change

 (2.6) 0.6 (6.6) (1.0) (0.1) 1.1 (8.6) 4.5 1.8  (0.5) 1.1 3.7 10.6 
                              

Balance as of June 30, 2013

 $96.2 $44.4 $219.4 $29.9 $8.2 $36.5 $434.6 

Balance as of September 30, 2013

 $100.7 $46.2 $219.4 $29.4 $9.3 $40.2 $445.2 
                              

Balance as of December 31, 2012

 $95.4 $40.3 $224.0 $30.8 $7.9 $31.6 $430.0  $95.4 $40.3 $224.0 $30.8 $7.9 $31.6 $430.0 

Long-term flows:

  

Sales/new accounts

 8.3 1.0 31.3 3.0 0.5 2.9 47.0  12.6 3.1 40.8 4.2 1.3 3.7 65.7 

Redemptions/terminations

 (12.8) (0.6) (22.6) (2.5) (0.4) (0.8) (39.7) (17.6) (0.6) (31.9) (3.9) (0.6) (1.1) (55.7)

Cash flow/unreinvested dividends

 (2.3) (0.2) (3.0) (0.7) 0.4 1.3 (4.5) (4.9) (3.5) (6.0) (1.1) 0.7 2.8 (12.0)
                              

Net long-term (outflows) inflows

 (6.8) 0.2 5.7 (0.2) 0.5 3.4 2.8  (9.9) (1.0) 2.9 (0.8) 1.4 5.4 (2.0)

Market appreciation (depreciation)

 7.6 3.9 (10.3) (0.7) (0.2) 1.5 1.8  15.2 6.9 (7.5) (0.6)  3.2 17.2 
                              

Net change

 0.8 4.1 (4.6) (0.9) 0.3 4.9 4.6  5.3 5.9 (4.6) (1.4) 1.4 8.6 15.2 
                              

Balance as of June 30, 2013

 $96.2 $44.4 $219.4 $29.9 $8.2 $36.5 $434.6 

Balance as of September 30, 2013

 $100.7 $46.2 $219.4 $29.4 $9.3 $40.2 $445.2 
                              

Balance as of June 30, 2012

 $107.4 $35.1 $197.1 $31.0 $5.3 $31.4 $407.3 

Balance as of September 30, 2012

 $100.3 $36.7 $212.2 $31.6 $6.8 $31.3 $418.9 

Long-term flows:

  

Sales/new accounts

 12.3 4.1 64.1 5.4 2.3 4.3 92.5  14.6 5.2 58.1 5.5 2.0 4.4 89.8 

Redemptions/terminations

 (34.3) (1.6) (37.5) (4.8) (0.4) (1.5) (80.1) (26.3) (0.7) (38.8) (5.3) (0.6) (1.5) (73.2)

Cash flow/unreinvested dividends

 (5.4) 0.3 (2.1) (1.7) 1.3 (1.3) (8.9) (6.4) (2.4) (6.2) (2.0) 1.4 2.0 (13.6)
                              

Net long-term (outflows) inflows

 (27.4) 2.8 24.5 (1.1) 3.2 1.5 3.5  (18.1) 2.1 13.1 (1.8) 2.8 4.9 3.0 

Market appreciation (depreciation)

 16.2 6.5 (2.2)  (0.3) 3.6 23.8  18.5 7.4 (5.9) (0.4) (0.3) 4.0 23.3 
                              

Net change

 (11.2) 9.3 22.3 (1.1) 2.9 5.1 27.3  0.4 9.5 7.2 (2.2) 2.5 8.9 26.3 
                              

Balance as of June 30, 2013

 $96.2 $44.4 $219.4 $29.9 $8.2 $36.5 $434.6 

Balance as of September 30, 2013

 $100.7 $46.2 $219.4 $29.4 $9.3 $40.2 $445.2 
                              

(1)
Includes index, enhanced index and factor-based strategies.

(2)
Includes asset allocation services and certain other alternative investments.

Table of Contents

        Average assets under management by distribution channel and investment service were as follows:


 Three Months
Ended
  
  
 Six Months
Ended
  
  
  Three Months
Ended
  
  
 Nine Months
Ended
  
  
 

 6/30/13 6/30/12 $ Change % Change 6/30/13 6/30/12 $ Change % Change  9/30/13 9/30/12 $ Change % Change 9/30/13 9/30/12 $ Change % Change 

 (in billions)
  (in billions)
 

Distribution Channel:

  

Institutions

 $227.8 $217.7 $10.1 4.6%$225.2 $222.2 $3.0 1.4% $225.7 $213.3 $12.4 5.8%$225.5 $219.4 $6.1 2.8%

Retail

 150.5 123.8 26.7 21.6 148.6 121.1 27.5 22.7  147.0 130.0 17.0 13.1 148.4 124.3 24.1 19.4 

Private Client

 67.6 69.6 (2.0) (2.9) 67.2 70.3 (3.1) (4.4) 67.2 67.7 (0.5) (0.8) 67.3 69.5 (2.2) (3.2)
                                  

Total

 $445.9 $411.1 $34.8 8.5 $441.0 $413.6 $27.4 6.6  $439.9 $411.0 $28.9 7.0 $441.2 $413.2 $28.0 6.8 
                                  

Investment Service:

  

Equity Actively Managed

 $98.9 $114.4 $(15.5) (13.6)%$98.0 $120.2 $(22.2) (18.5)% $98.9 $101.7 $(2.8) (2.8)%$98.5 $114.1 $(15.6) (13.6)%

Equity Passively Managed(1)

 44.6 35.2 9.4 26.9 43.3 35.0 8.3 23.8  45.4 35.7 9.7 27.2 44.1 35.3 8.8 24.9 

Fixed Income Actively Managed—Taxable

 227.2 193.5 33.7 17.4 225.8 191.7 34.1 17.8  219.4 205.0 14.4 7.0 223.9 196.4 27.5 14.0 

Fixed Income Actively Managed—Tax-exempt

 30.7 30.9 (0.2) (0.7) 30.8 30.8    29.5 31.3 (1.8) (6.0) 30.3 31.0 (0.7) (2.1)

Fixed Income Passively Managed(1)

 8.3 5.3 3.0 55.8 8.2 5.1 3.1 59.2  8.8 5.9 2.9 49.1 8.4 5.4 3.0 55.3 

Other(2)

 36.2 31.8 4.4 13.9 34.9 30.8 4.1 13.4  37.9 31.4 6.5 20.7 36.0 31.0 5.0 16.1 
                                  

Total

 $445.9 $411.1 $34.8 8.5 $441.0 $413.6 $27.4 6.6  $439.9 $411.0 $28.9 7.0 $441.2 $413.2 $28.0 6.8 
                                  

(1)
Includes index, enhanceenhanced index and factor-based strategies.

(2)
Includes asset allocation services and certain other alternative investments.

        Our InstitutionsInstitutional channel secondthird quarter average AUM of $227.8$225.7 billion increased by $10.1$12.4 billion, or 4.6%5.8%, compared to the secondthird quarter of 2012,2012. This is primarily due to our Institutional channel AUM increasing $9.0$12.9 billion, or 4.2%6.0%, over the last twelve months to $223.9$227.3 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2013. The $9.0$12.9 billion increase in AUM over the past twelve months was primarily due to $3.2$7.5 billion of net inflows (consisting of inflows of $18.2$13.6 billion in Fixed Income and $1.2$4.2 billion in Other, partially offset by outflows of $16.2$10.3 billion in Equity services) and market appreciation of $5.8$5.3 billion.

        Our Retail channel secondthird quarter average AUM of $150.5$147.0 billion increased by $26.7$17.0 billion, or 21.6%13.1%, compared to the secondthird quarter of 2012,2012. This is primarily due to our Retail channel AUM increasing $19.6$13.4 billion, or 15.7%9.8%, over the last twelve months to $144.4$149.8 billion at JuneSeptember 30, 2013. The $19.6$13.4 billion increase in AUM over the past twelve months was primarily due to $7.4market appreciation of $11.8 billion and $1.7 billion of net inflows (consisting of inflows of $11.7$4.1 billion in Fixed Income and $0.2 billion in Other, partially offset by outflows of $4.5$2.6 billion in Equity services) and market appreciation of $12.2 billion.. The increase in average AUM was $7.1being $3.6 billion greater than the increase in period-end AUM over the past twelve months is primarily becausedue to generally positive net flows throughover the first eleveneight months were offset by netand large outflows in June.

        Our Private Client channel secondthird quarter average AUM of $67.6$67.2 billion declined by $2.0$0.5 billion, or 2.9%0.8%, compared to the secondthird quarter of 2012, primarily due to our Private Client channel AUM declining $1.3remaining at $68.1 billion or 1.9%, overduring the last twelve months. Net outflows of $6.2 billion in the twelve months to $66.3 billion at Juneended September 30, 2013. The $1.3 billion decrease in AUM was primarily due to $7.1 billion of net outflows2013 (consisting of outflows of $3.9$3.1 billion in Equity services and $3.3$3.5 billion in Fixed Income, partially offset by inflows of $0.1$0.4 billion in Other), partially were offset by market appreciation of $5.8$6.2 billion.

        On October 1, 2013, AXA is expected to complete the sale of one of its subsidiaries, MONY Life Insurance Company ("MONY"), to an unaffiliated third party. As of June 30, 2013, we manage approximately $8.2 billion of MONY assets. We expect to lose most of the assets as of the date of the closing of the sale. The loss of these assets will have an immaterial effect on our revenues as these are low-fee assets.


Table of Contents

        Absolute investment composite returns, net of fees, and relative performance compared to benchmarks for certain representative Institutional (except as otherwise indicated) Equity (our core equities services) and Fixed Income services were as follows:


 For the three
months ended
June 30, 2013
 For the six
months ended
June 30, 2013
  For the Three
Months Ended
September 30, 2013
 For the Nine
Months Ended
September 30, 2013
 

Global High Income (fixed income)

  

Absolute return

 (2.0)% 0.9% 2.4% 3.3%

Relative return (vs. 33% Barclays High Yield, 33% JPM EMBI Global and 33% JPM GBI-EM)

 2.7 5.3  0.8 6.2 

Global Fixed Income (fixed income)

  

Absolute return

 (3.8) (6.3) 2.4 (4.1)

Relative return (vs. CITI WLD GV BD-USD/JPM GLBL BD)

 (0.8) (0.6) (0.5) (1.1)

Intermediate Municipal Bonds (fixed income) (Private Client composite)

  

Absolute return

 (2.2) (1.9) 0.5 (1.4)

Relative return (vs. Lipper Short/Int. Blended Muni Fund Avg)

 (0.1) (0.1) 0.2 0.1 

U.S. Strategic Core Plus (fixed income)

  

Absolute return

 (2.7) (2.7) 0.6 (2.1)

Relative return (vs. Barclays U.S. Aggregate)

 (0.4) (0.2) 0.0 (0.2)

Emerging Market Debt (fixed income)

  

Absolute return

 (6.4) (8.3) 0.7 (7.6)

Relative return (vs. JPM EMBI Global/JPM EMBI)

 (0.3) (0.1) (0.1) (0.2)

Global Plus (fixed income)

  

Absolute return

 (3.3) (5.2) 2.3 (3.0)

Relative return (vs. Barclays Global Aggregate)

 (0.5) (0.3) (0.5) (0.8)

Emerging Markets Value

  

Absolute return

 (11.7) (15.3) 7.1 (9.2)

Relative return (vs. MSCI EM Index)

 (3.6) (5.7) 1.4 (4.9)

Global Value

  

Absolute return

 2.6 11.3  9.9 22.3 

Relative return (vs. MSCI World Index)

 2.0 2.9  1.7 5.0 

International Value

  

Absolute return

 0.4 4.4  11.4 16.3 

Relative return (vs. MSCI EAFE Index)

 1.4 0.3  (0.2) 0.1 

U.S. Small & Mid Cap Value

  

Absolute return

 2.7 17.4  7.6 26.3 

Relative return (vs. Russell 2500 Value Index)

 1.2 2.3  1.2 3.8 

U.S. Strategic Value

  

Absolute return

 5.8 19.9  5.0 25.8 

Relative return (vs. Russell 1000 Value Index)

 2.6 4.0  1.0 5.3 

U.S. Small Cap Growth

  

Absolute return

 5.3 16.7  14.7 33.8 

Relative return (vs. Russell 2000 Growth Index)

 1.5 (0.7) 1.8 1.3 

U.S. Large Cap Growth

  

Absolute return

 1.4 10.7  11.2 23.1 

Relative return (vs. Russell 1000 Growth Index)

 (0.7) (1.1) 3.1 2.2 

U.S. Strategic Growth (Private Client composite)

  

Absolute return

 1.5 10.5  11.4 23.0 

Relative return (vs. S&P 500 Index)

 (1.4) (3.3) 6.1 3.2 

Select U.S. Equity

  

Absolute return

 3.6 14.7  3.9 19.2 

Relative return (vs. S&P 500 Index)

 0.7 0.9  (1.3) (0.6)

International Style Blend—Developed

  

Absolute return

 0.2 4.9  11.1 16.6 

Relative return (vs. MSCI EAFE Index)

 1.2 0.8  (0.5) 0.4 

Table of Contents

        Our Fixed Income services generally underperformed their benchmarksDuring the third quarter of 2013, evidence of faster growth across developed economies contributed to significant concerns regarding rising interest rates and continued outflows from bond funds around the world. However, in contrast to the second quarter, of 2013 as both ratefund outflows were less severe, bond yields rose more modestly and credit strategies experienced lossesspreads narrowed somewhat, with credit sectors outperforming most developed-market government debt. Currency volatility escalated in a volatile market. These services are now modestly lagging their benchmarks for the year to date. Yields on U.S. Treasuries rose and the U.S. yield curve steepened in response to signals by the Federal Reserve that it would soon temper its aggressive bond-buying program. The Federal Reserve-induced sell-off prompted outflows fromthird quarter as uncertainty increased regarding central-bank policies worldwide. Amid this environment, performance across our fixed income mutual funds, bothservices was mixed.

        Underweights in the U.S.Japan and around the world. Corporate bond spreads widened as rates rose, leading to losses across most corporate subsectors. Overweights in intermediate U.S. bondsperipheral European countries detracted from relative returns withinin our global and U.S. multisector portfolios, as did our short positions in several developed market currencies compared to the U.S. dollar. Our emerging market debt portfolios are also modestly behind their benchmarks after fees, largely due to security selection. Performance in our U.S. multisector portfolios was in line with their benchmarks, with credit sector overweights helping, but security selection in the mortgage sector and short currency positions detracting. Performance in our global high income portfolios exceeded benchmarks due to non-government sectors. Our Global High Income strategy benefited from anthe portfolios' underweight in emerging market debt a sector which lagged significantlyin favor of high yield corporates.

        The municipal yield curve steepened more dramatically than the U.S. Treasury yield curve, with the longest-maturity bonds underperforming. Our intermediate municipal portfolios outperformed due in large part to our underweight in long-maturity bonds, as slowing growth in China and in other emerging economies hurt, and substantial fund redemptions began to unwind, several years of positive inflows to the sector. Within our dedicated emerging-market debt portfolios, security selection in Mexico and Turkey detracted from returns. Anwell as an overweight to liquid medium-grade issuers detracted from relative returns withinA-rated debt which outperformed lower-rated municipals.

        For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, our global, emerging, and U.S. multisector portfolios are underperforming their benchmarks after fees; our intermediate municipal and global high income portfolios offset somewhat by a positive contribution from maturity selection.are outperforming their benchmarks.

        Performance of our major Equity services continued to improve over the three- and nine-month periods ending September 30, 2013, with the great majority outperforming their benchmarks over both periods. Emerging Markets Value was still mixed,an exception, outperforming in the third quarter but improved,continuing to lag its benchmark for the three-month and six-month periods ending June 30, 2013. Over this period, our U.S., International and Global value services outperformed their benchmarks, but Emerging Market Value services lagged. Our U.S. Large and Small Cap growth services also underperformed their benchmarks in the six-month period. We attribute this performance pattern to our services' adherence to their core investment disciplines. Long-termyear, as long-term value characteristics, such as inexpensive cash flows, have returnedonly began to return to favor in mostemerging markets during the third quarter, rather later than in other parts of the world,world. International Value and International Style Blend were slightly behind their benchmark for the quarter but underperformed in emerging markets,slightly ahead for the year, while long-term growth characteristics mostly underperformed in the U.S. Our core research approach has not wavered; we continue to believe that staying true to our investment disciplines is in our clients' best interestsSelect Equity lagged modestly over the long term.both periods.


Table of Contents

Consolidated Results of Operations


 Three Months
Ended
  
  
 Six Months
Ended
  
  
 

  
 %
Change
  
 %
Change
  Three Months Ended  
  
 Nine Months Ended  
  
 

 6/30/13 6/30/12 $ Change 6/30/13 6/30/12 $ Change  9/30/13 9/30/12 $ Change % Change 9/30/13 9/30/12 $ Change % Change 

 (in millions, except per unit amounts)
  (in millions, except per unit amounts)
 

Net revenues

 $734.3 $642.1 $92.2 14.3%$1,443.4 $1,324.0 $119.4 9.0% $706.1 $708.2 $(2.1) (0.3)%$2,149.5 $2,032.1 $117.4 5.8%

Expenses

 597.6 563.4 34.2 6.1 1,182.6 1,144.0 38.6 3.4  597.5 764.0 (166.5) (21.8) 1,780.0 1,907.9 (127.9) (6.7)
                                  

Operating income

 136.7 78.7 58.0 73.5 260.8 180.0 80.8 44.9  108.6 (55.8) 164.4 n/m 369.5 124.2 245.3 197.5 

Income taxes

 9.6 5.8 3.8 63.8 20.7 12.5 8.2 65.3  7.3 (7.6) 14.9 n/m 28.0 5.0 23.0 463.3 
                                  

Net income

 127.1 72.9 54.2 74.3 240.1 167.5 72.6 43.4 

Net (loss) income of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests

 6.4 (1.3) 7.7 n/m 4.9 6.0 (1.1) (18.3)

Net income (loss)

 101.3 (48.2) 149.5 n/m 341.5 119.2 222.3 186.5 

Net income (loss) of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests

 1.4 (4.0) 5.4 n/m 6.3 2.0 4.3 217.6 
                                  

Net income attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $120.7 $74.2 $46.5 62.7 $235.2 $161.5 $73.7 45.7 

Net income (loss) attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $99.9 $(44.2)$144.1 n/m $335.2 $117.2 $218.0 185.9 
                                  

Diluted net income per AllianceBernstein Unit

 $0.43 $0.26 $0.17 65.4 $0.83 $0.58 $0.25 43.1 

Diluted net income (loss) per AllianceBernstein Unit

 $0.37 $(0.16)$0.53 n/m $1.21 $0.42 $0.79 188.1 
                                  

Distributions per AllianceBernstein Unit

 $0.44 $0.26 $0.18 69.2 $0.85 $0.57 $0.28 49.1  $0.46 $0.41 $0.05 12.2 $1.31 $0.98 $0.33 33.7 
                       ��           

Operating margin(1)

 17.7% 12.5%     17.7% 13.1%      15.2% n/m     16.9% 6.0%     
                          

(1)
Operating income excluding net income (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interests as a percentage of net revenues.

        Net income attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders for the three months ended September 30, 2013 increased $144.1 million from the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase was primarily due to (in millions):

Lower real estate charges

 $144.0 

Higher base advisory fees

  24.6 

Lower portfolio services

  18.8 

Lower occupancy expenses (excluding real estate)

  9.4 

Higher Bernstein research services revenues

  6.7 

Lower performance-based fees

  (39.6)

Higher income taxes

  (14.9)

Other

  (4.9)
    

 $144.1 
    

Table of Contents

        Net income attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders for the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 increased $46.5$218.0 million or 62.7%, from the threenine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2012. The increase was primarily due to (in millions):

Higher base advisory fees

 $33.5 

Lower office and related expenses (excluding real estate)

  14.3 

Higher Bernstein Research Services revenues

  11.8 

Higher long-term incentive compensation investment gains

  8.5 

Lower professional fees

  6.7 

Lower real estate charges

  4.9 

Higher employee compensation and benefits

  (33.7)

Other

  0.5 
    

 $46.5 
    

        Net income attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders for the six months ended June 30, 2013 increased $73.7 million, or 45.7%, from the six months ended June 30, 2012. The increase was primarily due to (in millions):

Lower real estate charges

 $157.4 

Higher base advisory fees

 $52.7  77.3 

Lower office and related expenses (excluding real estate)

 31.1 

Higher Bernstein Research Services revenues

 15.1 

Lower real estate charges

 13.5 

Lower occupancy (excluding real estate)

 35.9 

Lower portfolio services

 24.5 

Higher Bernstein research services revenues

 21.8 

Lower performance-based fees

 (38.9)

Higher employee compensation and benefits

 (32.3) (34.0)

Higher other promotion and servicing

 (5.8)

Higher income taxes

 (23.0)

Other

 (0.6) (3.0)
      

 $73.7  $218.0 
      

Real Estate Charges

        As discussed inAs we discuss in Note 5 5 to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus, during the first sixnine months of 2013, we recorded real estate charges of $2.6$26.7 million, composed of $2.5$16.1 million resulting from a change in estimates relating to previously recorded real estate charges ($2.215.8 million relatedrelates to the 2010 and 2012 chargesplans and $0.3 million related to other real estate charges), $0.2 million for the write-off of leasehold improvements, furniture and $0.1equipment relating to the 2012 plan and new real estate charges of $10.4 million ($1.5 million relates to the 2012 plan, $5.3 million relates to other real estate charges and $3.6 million relating to the write-off of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment.equipment).

        We may record charges for additional changes in estimates during the second halffourth quarter of this year as we approach the end of assumed marketing periods on floors written-off during 2012 and we compare current sublease market conditions to those assumed in our initial write-offs and adjust accordingly. At this juncture, we stillcontinue to anticipate cumulative write-offs in our previously announced range of $225 million to $250 million related to our global real estate consolidation program launched in the third quarter of 2012, which targets the sublease of approximately 510,000 square feet of office space.

        Also, we may incur a few additional real estate write-offs as we continue to search for opportunities to further consolidate our office footprint and vacate floors in addition to the approximately 510,000 square feet under our previously announced global real estate consolidation program.

Units Outstanding

        During the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2013, we purchased 0.30.8 million and 1.32.1 million Holding Units for $7.4$16.3 million and $27.0$43.3 million, respectively (on a trade date basis). These amounts


Table of Contents

reflect open-market purchases of 0.30.8 million and 1.11.9 million Holding Units for $7.2$15.3 million and $23.2$38.5 million, respectively, with the remainder relating to purchases of Holding Units from employees to allow them to fulfill statutory tax withholding requirements at the time of distribution of long-term incentive compensation awards, offset by Holding Units purchased by employees as part of a distribution reinvestment election.

        Since the third quarter of 2011, each quarter we have implemented plans each quarter to repurchase Holding Units pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act").Act. A Rule 10b5-1 plan allows a company to repurchase its shares at times when it otherwise might be prevented from doing so because of self-imposed trading blackout periods and because it possesses material non-public information. Each broker we select has the authority under the terms and limitations specified in the plan to repurchase Holding Units on our behalf in accordance with the terms of the plan. Repurchases are subject to SEC regulations as well as certain price, market volume and timing constraints specified in the plan. The plan adopted during the secondthird quarter of 2013 expired at the close of business on July 30,October 23, 2013. We


Table of Contents

may adopt additional Rule 10b5-1 plans in the future to engage in open-market purchases of Holding Units to help fund anticipated obligations under our incentive compensation award program and for other corporate purposes.

        We granted to employees and Eligible Directors 6.86.9 million restricted Holding Unit awards (including 6.5 million granted in January 2013 for 2012 year-end awards) during the first sixnine months of 2013. To fund these awards, we allocated previously repurchased Holding Units that had been held in AllianceBernstein's consolidated rabbi trust. There were approximately 13.1 million unallocated Holding Units remaining in the consolidated rabbi trust as of June 30, 2013.

        Effective July 1, 2013, management of AllianceBernstein and Holding retired all unallocated Holding Units in AllianceBernstein's consolidated rabbi trust. To retire such units, AllianceBernstein delivered the unallocated Holding Units held in its consolidated rabbi trust to Holding in exchange for the same amount of AllianceBernstein units. Each entity then retired their respective units. As a result, on July 1, 2013, each of AllianceBernstein's and Holding's units outstanding decreased by approximately 13.1 million units. AllianceBernstein and Holding intend to retire additional units as AllianceBernstein purchases Holding Units on the open market. Holding will then newly issue Holding Units to fund AllianceBernstein's restricted Holding Unit awards in exchange for newly issued-issued AllianceBernstein units.

        Generally, when a corporate entity repurchases its shares, they no longer are deemed outstanding. Because of our two-tier partnership structure, Holding Units purchased by AllianceBernstein and held in its consolidated rabbi trust are considered outstanding (unlike repurchased shares of a single corporate entity). Accordingly, management's decision to retire repurchased Holding Units rather than allowing them to remain outstanding in the rabbi trust more closely aligns the effect of our Holding Unit purchases with that of corporate entities that repurchase their shares.

        Assuming constant net income, retirement of units outstanding will have a favorable impact on earnings per unit, and the issuance of new units will have a negative impact on earnings per unit. This July 2013 event had no impact on our second quarter 2013 earnings per unit.

        During the first sixnine months of 2013, Holding issued 778,739812,642 Holding Units upon exercise of options to buy Holding Units. Holding used the proceeds of $13.3$13.9 million to purchase the equivalent number of newly issued-issued AllianceBernstein Units.

Cash Distributions

        AllianceBernstein is required to distribute all of its Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement, to its Unitholdersunitholders (including the General Partner). Typically, in the past, Available Cash Flow was the diluted earnings per unit for the quarter multiplied by the


Table of Contents

number of general and limited partnership interests at the end of the quarter, except when, as was the case with the compensation-related charge in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the real estate charge in the third quarter of 2012, the effects of the non-cash charges were eliminated. Starting in the third quarter of 2012, Available Cash Flow has been the adjusted diluted net income per unit for the quarter multiplied by the number of general and limited partnership interests at the end of the quarter. In future periods, management anticipates that Available Cash Flow typically will be based on adjusted diluted net income per unit, unless management determines that one or more non-GAAP adjustments should not be made with respect to the Available Cash Flow calculation. SeeNote 4 to the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus for a description of Available Cash Flow.prospectus.

Management Operating Metrics

        We are providing the non-GAAP measures "adjusted net revenues,"revenues", "adjusted operating income" and "adjusted operating margin" because they are the principal operating metrics management uses in evaluating and comparing period-to-period operating performance and we believe they are useful to investors. Management principally uses these metrics in evaluating performance because they present a


Table of Contents

clearer picture of our operating performance, and allow management to see long-term trends without the distortion primarily caused by long-term incentive compensation-related mark-to-market adjustments, real estate consolidation charges and other adjustment items. Similarly, these management operating metrics help investors better understand the underlying trends in our results and, accordingly, we believe they provide a valuable perspective for investors.

        These non-GAAP measures are provided in addition to, and not as substitutes for, net revenues, operating income and operating margin, and they may not be comparable to non-GAAP measures presented by other companies. Management uses both the GAAP and non-GAAP measures in


Table of Contents

evaluating our financial performance. The non-GAAP measures alone may pose limitations because they do not include all of our revenues and expenses.


 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 

 2013 2012 2013 2012  2013 2012 2013 2012 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Net revenues, GAAP basis

 $734,275 $642,163 $1,443,397 $1,323,972  $706,078 $708,158 $2,149,475 $2,032,130 

Exclude:

  

Long-term incentive compensation-related investment (gains) losses

 (818) 7,619 (6,847) (7,951) (5,284) (6,374) (12,131) (14,326)

Long-term incentive compensation-related dividends and interest

 (196) (344) (465) (724) (210) (300) (675) (1,023)

90% of consolidated venture capital fund investment (gains) losses

 (6,602) 907 (5,382) (6,779) (1,588) 3,634 (6,970) (3,145)

Distribution-related payments

 (111,386) (86,120) (220,666) (165,989) (101,368) (94,779) (322,034) (260,768)

Amortization of deferred sales commissions

 (10,325) (10,171) (21,399) (18,438) (10,363) (10,658) (31,762) (29,096)

Pass-through fees and expenses

 (7,022) (7,917) (13,890) (15,655) (7,509) (25,617) (21,398) (41,272)
                  

Adjusted net revenues

 $597,926 $546,137 $1,174,748 $1,108,436  $579,756 $574,064 $1,754,505 $1,682,500 
                  

Operating income, GAAP basis

 $136,654 $78,747 $260,852 $179,992 

Operating income (loss), GAAP basis

 $108,618 $(55,821)$369,470 $124,171 

Exclude:

  

Long-term incentive compensation-related investment (gains) losses

 (818) 7,619 (6,847) (7,951) (5,284) (6,374) (12,131) (14,326)

Long-term incentive compensation-related dividends and interest

 (196) (344) (465) (724) (210) (300) (675) (1,023)

Long-term incentive compensation-related mark-to-market vesting expense (credit)

 408 (7,030) 6,013 6,979 

Long-term incentive compensation-related mark-to-market vesting expense

 5,136 5,986 11,148 12,965 

Long-term incentive compensation-related dividends and interest expense

 928 711 1,650 863  266 582 1,917 1,445 
                  

Net impact of long-term incentive compensation-related items

 322 956 351 (833) (92) (106) 259 (939)

Real estate charges

 1,935 6,787 2,573 16,056  24,125 168,086 26,698 184,142 
                  

Sub-total of non-GAAP adjustments

 2,257 7,743 2,924 15,223  24,033 167,980 26,957 183,203 

Less: Net income (loss) of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests

 6,376 (1,276) 4,891 5,988  1,413 (4,003) 6,304 1,985 
                  

Adjusted operating income

 $132,535 $87,766 $258,885 $189,227  $131,238 $116,162 $390,123 $305,389 
                  

Adjusted operating margin

 22.2% 16.1% 22.0% 17.1% 22.6% 20.2% 22.2% 18.2%

Table of Contents

        Adjusted operating income for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 increased $44.8$15.1 million, or 51.0%13.0%, from the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2012, primarily as a result of higher investment advisory base fees of $34.9 million, higher Bernstein research services revenues of $11.8$24.7 million and lower general and administrative expenses (excluding real estate charges) of $23.5$12.8 million, offset by lower performance-based fees of $21.7 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, adjusted operating income increased $84.7 million, or 27.7%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2012, primarily as a result of higher investment advisory base fees of $80.2 million, lower general and administrative expenses (excluding real estate charges) of $54.5 million and higher Bernstein Research Services revenues of $21.8 million, offset by higher employee compensation expense (excluding the impact of long-term incentive compensation-related items) of $26.0 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 adjusted operating income increased $69.7$35.4 million, or 36.8%, from the six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily as a result of higher investment advisory baselower performance-based fees of $55.5 million, higher Bernstein Research Services revenues of $15.1 million and lower general and administrative expenses (excluding real estate charges) of $41.7 million, offset by higher employee compensation expense (excluding the impact of long-term incentive compensation-related items) of $32.5$21.0 million, lower net distribution revenuesseed capital/other investment gains of $6.2$7.2 million and higher other promotion and servicing expenses of $4.8$5.4 million.


Table of Contents

        Adjusted net revenues exclude investment gains and losses and dividends and interest on long-term incentive compensation-related investments, and 90% of the investment gains and losses of our consolidated venture capital fund attributable to non-controlling interests. In addition, adjusted net revenues offset distribution-related payments to third parties as well as amortization of deferred sales commissions against distribution revenues. We believe the offset of distribution-related payments from net revenues is useful for our investors and other users of our financial statements because such presentation appropriately reflects the nature of these costs as pass-through payments to third parties who perform functions on behalf of our sponsored mutual funds and/or shareholders of these funds. We offset amortization of deferred sales commissions against net revenues because such costs, over time, essentially offset our distribution revenues. We also exclude additional pass-through expenses we incur (primarily through our transfer agency) that are reimbursed and recorded as fees in revenues. During the third quarter of 2012, we offset sub-advisory payments to third parties against performance-based fees earned on the Public-Private Investment Partnership fund we managed. These fees have no impact on operating income, but they do have an impact on our operating margin. As such, we exclude these fees from adjusted net revenues.

        Adjusted operating income represents operating income on a GAAP basis excluding (1) the impact on net revenues and compensation expense of the mark-to-market gains and losses (as well as the dividends and interest) associated with employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments, (2) real estate charges and (3) the net lossincome or incomeloss of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests.

        Prior to 2009, a large proportion of employee compensation was in the form of long-term incentive compensation awards that were notionally invested in AllianceBernstein investment services and generally vested over a period of four years. AllianceBernstein economically hedged the exposure to market movements by purchasing and holding these investments on its balance sheet. All such investments have vested as of year-end 2012 and the investments have been distributed to the participants, except for those investments with respect to which the participant elected a long-term deferral. The investments' appreciation or depreciation is recorded within investment gains and losses on the income statement, as well as increasing or decreasing compensation expense. Because this plan is economically hedged, management believes it is useful to reflect the offset achieved from hedging the investments' market exposure in the calculation of adjusted operating income and adjusted operating margin. The non-GAAP measures exclude gains and losses and dividends and interest on long-term incentive compensation-related investments included in revenues and compensation expense.

        Real estate charges have been excluded because they are not considered part of our core operating results when comparing financial results from period to period and to industry peers.


Table of Contents

        Most of the net income or loss of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests relates to the 90% limited partner interests held by third parties in our consolidated venture capital fund. We own a 10% limited partner interest in the fund. Because we are the general partner of the venture capital fund and are deemed to have a controlling interest, U.S. GAAP requires us to consolidate the financial results of the fund. However, recognizing 100% of the gains or losses in operating income while only retaining 10% is not reflective of our underlying financial results at the operating income level. As a result, we are excluding the 90% limited partner interests we do not own from our adjusted operating income. Similarly, net income of joint ventures attributable to non-controlling interests, although not significant, is excluded because it does not reflect the economic interest attributable to AllianceBernstein.


Table of Contents

        Adjusted operating margin allows us to monitor our financial performance and efficiency from period to period and to compare our performance to industry peers without the volatility noted above in our discussion of adjusted operating income. Adjusted operating margin is derived by dividing adjusted operating income by adjusted net revenues.


Table of Contents

Net Revenues

        The following table summarizes the components of net revenues:


 Three Months
Ended
  
  
 Six Months Ended  
  
  Three Months
Ended
  
  
 Nine Months Ended  
  
 

 6/30/13 6/30/12 $ Change % Change 6/30/13 6/30/12 $ Change % Change  9/30/13 9/30/12 $ Change % Change 9/30/13 9/30/12 $ Change % Change 

 (in millions)
  (in millions)
 

Investment advisory and services fees:

  

Institutions:

  

Base fees

 $100.4 $106.5 $(6.1) (5.7)%$201.8 $223.7 $(21.9) (9.8)% $101.9 $102.6 $(0.7) (0.7)%$303.8 $326.3 $(22.5) (6.9)%

Performance-based fees

 3.6 3.7 (0.1) (3.8) 6.2 8.1 (1.9) (23.6) (0.2) 34.3 (34.5) n/m 6.0 42.4 (36.4) (85.8)
                                  

 104.0 110.2 (6.2) (5.6) 208.0 231.8 (23.8) (10.2) 101.7 136.9 (35.2) (25.7) 309.8 368.7 (58.9) (16.0)
                                  

Retail:

  

Base fees

 208.6 166.0 42.6 25.7 408.9 323.0 85.9 26.6  203.4 179.2 24.2 13.6 612.3 502.2 110.1 21.9 

Performance-based fees

 1.7  1.7 n/m 2.5  2.5 n/m  0.1 2.9 (2.8) (96.3) 2.6 3.0 (0.4) (13.9)
                                  

 210.3 166.0 44.3 26.7 411.4 323.0 88.4 27.3  203.5 182.1 21.4 11.8 614.9 505.2 109.7 21.7 
                                  

Private Client:

  

Base fees

 144.6 147.6 (3.0) (2.1) 283.2 294.5 (11.3) (3.8) 143.7 142.6 1.1 0.7 426.8 437.1 (10.3) (2.3)

Performance-based fees

 0.2 0.1 0.1 177.7 0.3 0.1 0.2 284.2  0.4 2.7 (2.3) (87.0) 0.7 2.8 (2.1) (76.2)
                                  

 144.8 147.7 (2.9) (2.0) 283.5 294.6 (11.1) (3.7) 144.1 145.3 (1.2) (0.9) 427.5 439.9 (12.4) (2.8)
                                  

Total:

  

Base fees

 453.6 420.1 33.5 8.0 893.9 841.2 52.7 6.3  449.0 424.4 24.6 5.8 1,342.9 1,265.6 77.3 6.1 

Performance-based fees

 5.5 3.8 1.7 43.0 9.0 8.2 0.8 9.0  0.3 39.9 (39.6) (99.4) 9.3 48.2 (38.9) (80.9)
                                  

 459.1 423.9 35.2 8.3 902.9 849.4 53.5 6.3  449.3 464.3 (15.0) (3.2) 1,352.2 1,313.8 38.4 2.9 
                                  

Bernstein Research Services

 114.8 103.0 11.8 11.4 224.5 209.4 15.1 7.2 

Bernstein research services

 107.3 100.6 6.7 6.7 331.8 310.0 21.8 7.0 

Distribution revenues

 120.8 97.1 23.7 24.3 239.5 188.1 51.4 27.3  114.0 105.6 8.4 7.9 353.5 293.7 59.8 20.4 

Dividend and interest income

 4.5 5.0 (0.5) (9.0) 9.0 9.4 (0.4) (4.3) 4.4 5.1 (0.7) (12.9) 13.4 14.4 (1.0) (7.3)

Investment gains (losses)

 8.4 (10.9) 19.3 n/m 15.3 20.1 (4.8) (23.9) 6.5 7.2 (0.7) (10.4) 21.8 27.3 (5.5) (20.3)

Other revenues

 27.4 24.8 2.6 10.5 53.7 49.1 4.6 9.4  25.3 26.2 (0.9) (3.4) 79.0 75.3 3.7 5.0 
                                  

Total revenues

 735.0 642.9 92.1 14.3 1,444.9 1,325.5 119.4 9.0  706.8 709.0 (2.2) (0.3) 2,151.7 2,034.5 117.2 5.8 

Less: interest expense

 0.7 0.8 (0.1) (17.5) 1.5 1.5    0.7 0.8 (0.1) (24.1) 2.2 2.4 (0.2) (8.8)
                                  

Net revenues

 $734.3 $642.1 $92.2 14.3 $1,443.4 $1,324.0 $119.4 9.0  $706.1 $708.2 $(2.1) (0.3)$2,149.5 $2,032.1 $117.4 5.8 
                                  

        Investment advisory and services fees are the largest component of our revenues. These fees generally are calculated as a percentage of the value of AUM as of a specified date, or as a percentage of the value of average AUM for the applicable billing period, and vary with the type of investment service, the size of account and the total amount of assets we manage for a particular client. Accordingly, fee income generally increases or decreases as AUM increase or decrease and is therefore


Table of Contents

affected by market appreciation or depreciation, the addition of new client accounts or client contributions of additional assets to existing accounts, withdrawals of assets from and termination of client accounts, purchases and redemptions of mutual fund shares, shifts of assets between accounts or products with different fee structures, and acquisitions. Our average basis points realized (investment advisory fees divided by average AUM) generally approximate 50 to 70 basis points for actively managed equity services, 25 to 45 basis points for actively managed fixed income services and 5 to 20 basis points for passively managed services. As such, a shift of client assets from active equity services


Table of Contents

toward fixed income services and/or other services results in a decline in revenues just as a shift of assets toward active equity services would increase revenues.

        We calculate AUM using established fair valuation methodologies, including market-based valuation methods and fair valuation methods. Market-based valuation methods include: last sale/settle prices from an exchange for actively traded-traded listed equities, options and futures; evaluated bid prices from recognized pricing vendors for fixed income, asset-backed or mortgage-backed issues; mid prices from recognized pricing vendors and brokers for credit default swaps; and quoted bids or spreads from pricing vendors and brokers for other derivative products. Fair valuation methods include discounted cash flow models, evaluation of assets versus liabilities or any other methodology that is validated and approved by our Valuation Committee. Fair valuation methods are used only where AUM cannot be valued using market-based valuation methods, such as in the case of private equity or illiquid securities. Investments utilizing fair valuation methods typically make up an insignificant amount of our total AUM. Market volatility has not had a significant effect on our ability to acquire market data and, accordingly, our ability to use market-based valuation methods.

        The Valuation Committee, which is composed of senior officers and employees, is responsible for overseeing the pricing and valuation of all investments held in client and AllianceBernstein portfolios. The Valuation Committee has adopted a Statement of Pricing Policies describing principles and policies that apply to pricing and valuing investments held in these portfolios. We also have a Pricing Group, which reports to the Valuation Committee, and is responsible for overseeing the pricing process for all investments.

        We sometimes charge our clients performance-based fees. In these situations, we charge a base advisory fee and are eligible to earn an additional performance-based fee or incentive allocation that is calculated as either a percentage of absolute investment results or a percentage of investment results in excess of a stated benchmark over a specified period of time. Some performance-based fees include a high-watermark provision, which generally provides that if a client account underperforms relative to its performance target (whether absolute or relative to a specified benchmark), it must gain back such underperformance before we can collect future performance-based fees. Therefore, if we fail to achieve our performance target for a particular period, we will not earn a performance-based fee for that period and, for accounts with a high-watermark provision, our ability to earn future performance-based fees will be impaired. We are eligible to earn performance-based fees on approximately 9%10% of the assets we manage for institutional clients and approximately 3% of the assets we manage for private clients (in total, approximately 5% of our company-wide AUM). A majority of our hedge fund AUM is subject to high watermarks and a significant majority of this AUM is below the high watermarks. Accordingly, it is very unlikely we will earn performance-based fees on these hedge funds in 2013. If the percentage of our AUM subject to performance-based fees grows, seasonality and volatility of revenues and earnings are likely to become more significant.

        For the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013, our investment advisory and services fees decreased by $15.0 million, or 3.2%, from the third quarter of 2012, due to a $39.6 million decrease in performance-based fees resulting from the $39.6 million performance-based fee we earned during the third quarter of 2012 after we completed the liquation of our Public-Private Investment Partnership fund ("PPIP Fee"), partially offset by an increase in base fees of $24.6 million, or 5.8%, which primarily resulted from a 7.0% increase in average AUM. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, our investment advisory and services fees increased by $35.2$38.4 million, or 8.3%2.9%, from the second quarter of 2012, due to a $33.5 million, or 8.0%, increase in base fees, which primarily resulted from an 8.5% increase in average AUM. For the sixnine months ended June 30, 2013, our investment advisory and services fees increased by $53.5 million, or 6.3%, from six months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2012, due to a $52.7$77.3 million, or 6.3%6.1%, increase in base fees, which primarily resulted from a 6.6% increase in average AUM. In the case of both periods, the increase in base fees


Table of Contents

was less than the6.8% increase in average AUM, primarily due to the continued shiftpartially offset by a $38.9 million decrease in product mix from actively managed equity services to actively managed fixed income services, which generally have lowerperformance-based fees as compared to actively managed equity services.a result of the PPIP Fee in the prior year period.

        Institutional investment advisory and services fees for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 decreased by $6.2$35.2 million, or 5.6%25.7%, from the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2012, primarily due


Table of Contents

to a $34.5 million decrease in performance-based fees (as a result of the PPIP Fee) and a $0.7 million decrease in base fees due to the continued significant shift in product mix from actively managed equity services to actively managed fixed income services. Average AUM for actively managed equity services for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 decreased 34.1%20.1% while average AUM for actively managed fixed income services increased 13.4%7.1%. Institutional investment advisory and services fees for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 decreased by $23.8$58.9 million, or 10.2%16.0%, from the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2012, primarily due to a $36.4 million decrease in performance-based fees (as a result of the PPIP Fee) and a $22.5 million decrease in base fees due to the continued significant shift in product mix from actively managed equity services to actively managed fixed income services. Average AUM for actively managed equity services for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 decreased 39.4%33.9% while average AUM for actively managed fixed income services increased 12.0%10.2%.

        Retail investment advisory and services fees for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 increased by $44.3$21.4 million, or 26.7%11.8%, from the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2012, primarily due to a 21.6%13.1% increase in average AUM. The increaseAUM partially offset by a $2.8 million decrease in performance-based fees reflects higher fees from non-U.S. fixed income mutual funds(as a result of $31.9 million and higher fees from U.S. mutual funds of $5.1 million.the PPIP Fee). Retail investment advisory and services fees for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 increased by $88.4$109.7 million, or 27.3%21.7%, from the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2012, primarily due to a 22.7%19.4% increase in average AUM. The increase in fees reflects higher fees from non-U.S. fixed income mutual funds of $69.7 million and higher fees from U.S. mutual funds of $8.9 million.

        Private client investment advisory and services fees for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 decreased by $2.9$1.2 million, or 2.0%0.9%, from the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2012, primarily due to a $2.3 million decrease in performance-based fees (as a result of the PPIP Fee). Base fees increased $1.1 million, or 0.7%, despite a decrease in average billable AUM of 1.0%. Private client investment advisory and services fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 decreased by $12.4 million, or 2.8%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2012, primarily as a result of a decline in average billable AUM of 4.8%. Private client investment advisory and services fees for the six months ended June 30, 2013 decreased by $11.1 million, or 3.7%, from the six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily as a result of a decline in average billable AUM of 5.2%3.9%. In the case of both periods, the decreasefluctuation in fees was less thanfavorable to the decreasefluctuation in billable AUM reflecting the impact of an asset mix shift from fixed income services to actively managed equities services and other (principally alternatives) services.

        Bernstein Research Services revenue consists principally of equity commissions received for providing equity research and brokerage-related services to institutional investors.

        Revenues from Bernstein Research Services for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 increased $11.8$6.7 million, or 11.4%6.7%, and $15.1$21.8 million, or 7.2%7.0%, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2012. The increases were the result of strong growthimproving market volumes, especially in Europe and Asia.

        AllianceBernstein Investments and AllianceBernstein Luxembourg act as distributor and/or placing agent of company-sponsored mutual funds and receive distribution services fees from certain of those funds as partial reimbursement of the distribution expenses they incur. Period-over-period fluctuations of distribution revenues are typically in-line with fluctuations of the corresponding average AUM of these mutual funds.

        Distribution revenues for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 increased $23.7$8.4 million, or 24.3%7.9%, and $51.4$59.8 million, or 27.3%20.4%, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2012, while the corresponding average AUM of these mutual funds grew 24.2%9.5% and 27.3%21.1%, respectively. Average AUM of non-B share and non C-share mutual funds (which have lower distribution fee rates than B-share and C-share mutual funds) increased 12.6% and 25.3%, respectively, while average AUM of B-share and C-share mutual funds decreased by 4.8% and increased 2.6%, respectively.


Table of Contents

        Dividend and interest income consists primarily of investment income and interest earned on customer margin balances and U.S. Treasury Bills. Interest expense principally reflects interest accrued on cash balances in customers' brokerage accounts. Dividend and interest income, net of interest expense, for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 were essentially flat compared to the corresponding periods in 2012.

        Investment gains (losses) consist primarily of realized and unrealized investment gains or losses on: (i) employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments, (ii) investments owned by our consolidated venture capital fund, (iii) U.S. Treasury Bills, (iv) market-making in cash equities and exchange-traded options and equities, (v) seed capital investments and (vi) derivatives. Investments gains (losses) also include realized gains or losses on the sale of seed capital investments classified as available-for-sale securities and equity in earnings of proprietary investments in limited partnership hedge funds that we sponsor and manage.

        Investment gains (losses) are as follows:


 Three Months
Ended June 30,
 Six Months
Ended June 30,
  Three Months
Ended September 30,
 Nine Months
Ended September 30,
 

 2013 2012 2013 2012  2013 2012 2013 2012 

 (in millions)
  (in millions)
 

Long-term incentive compensation-related investments

  

Realized gains (losses)

 $0.8 $0.6 $1.3 $(0.8) $0.2 $ $1.4 $(0.8)

Unrealized gains (losses)

 0.1 (8.2) 5.6 8.8  5.1 6.3 10.7 15.1 

Consolidated private equity fund investments

  

Realized gains (losses)

 (10.7) 5.0 (12.2) 6.5  (0.6) (16.4) (12.9) (9.9)

Unrealized gains (losses)

 18.1 (6.0) 18.1 1.0  2.4 12.4 20.6 13.4 

Seed capital investments

  

Realized gains (losses)

 1.2 12.6 (7.8) (6.9) 4.0 (13.9) (3.9) (20.7)

Unrealized gains (losses)

 0.6 (13.2) 13.6 15.9  (3.4) 19.8 10.3 35.6 

Brokerage-related investments

  

Realized gains (losses)

 (3.0) (1.8) (6.3) (4.3) (0.6) (1.2) (6.9) (5.5)

Unrealized gains (losses)

 1.3 0.1 3.0 (0.1) (0.6) 0.2 2.5 0.1 
                  

 $8.4 $(10.9)$15.3 $20.1  $6.5 $7.2 $21.8 $27.3 
                  

        Realized gains or losses on long-term incentive compensation-related investments typically occur in December of each year, as well as during the first quarter, as award tranches become distributable and related investments are sold to provide cash for payments to employees. The unrealized gains for the sixthree and nine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012 reflect the favorable financial markets during the first quarterand third quarters in each year.

        Our consolidated private equity fund incurred realized losses of $10.7$0.6 million and $12.2$12.9 million during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013, respectively, as a result of sales of both publicly tradedpublicly-traded securities and non-public investments. The fund hadalso incurred realized gainslosses of $5.0$16.4 million and $6.5$9.9 million during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2012, respectively, primarily due to sales of publicly traded securities.both publicly-traded securities and non-public investments. Our consolidated private equity fund had unrealized gains of $18.1$2.4 million and $20.6 million during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013, respectively, as a result of higher prices of publicly traded securities andpublicly-traded securities; the fair values of non-public investments whiledeclined in the fund incurred unrealized lossesthird quarter of $6.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2012, primarily due to lower prices of public securities.2013, but remained


Table of Contents

positive over the first nine months of 2013. The fund also had unrealized gains of $12.4 million and $13.4 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, as a result of higher fair values of non-public investments and higher prices of publicly-traded securities during the third quarter of 2012.

        Our seed capital investments incurred realized losses of $7.8 million and $6.9$3.9 million during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 20132013. Additionally, we incurred realized losses of $13.9 million and $20.7 million during the three and nine months ended September 2012, respectively, due torespectively. These losses were the result of losses incurred on the derivatives we use to economically hedge our seed capital investments exceeding the gains realized on the sales of the seed capital investments. Our seed capital investments incurred realized gains of $4.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2013, as a result of our gains realized on the sales of the seed capital investments exceeding the losses incurred on the derivatives. The unrealized gain of $13.6$10.3 million during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 primarily reflects derivative mark-to-market gains whileon both the unrealized gain of $15.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 primarily reflects seed capital investment mark-to-market gains, slightlyand the derivative mark-to-market. The unrealized loss of $3.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2013 reflects derivative mark-to-market losses, partially offset by derivativeseed capital investment mark-to-market losses.gains. The unrealized gains of $19.8 million and $35.6 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, primarily reflect seed capital investment mark-to-market gains.

        Other revenues consist of fees earned for transfer agency services provided to company-sponsored mutual funds, fees earned for administration and recordkeeping services provided to company-sponsored mutual funds and the general accounts of AXA and its subsidiaries, and other miscellaneous revenues. Other revenues for the three and six months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 decreased $0.9 million, or 3.4%, primarily as a result of lower shareholder servicing fees. Other revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 increased $2.6$3.7 million, or 10.5%5.0%, and $4.6 million, or 9.4%, respectively, from the corresponding periods in 2012, primarily due toas a result of higher shareholder servicing fees.

Expenses

        The following table summarizes the components of expenses:


 Three Months
Ended
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Three Months
Ended
  
  
  
  
  
  
 

  
  
 Six Months Ended  
  
   
  
 Nine Months Ended  
  
 

  
 %
Change
  
 %
Change
   
 %
Change
  
 %
Change
 

 6/30/13 6/30/12 $ Change 6/30/13 6/30/12 $ Change  9/30/13 9/30/12 $ Change 9/30/13 9/30/12 $ Change 

 (in millions)
  (in millions)
 

Employee compensation and benefits

 $306.5 $272.8 $33.7 12.3%$607.7 $575.4 $32.3 5.6% $302.5 $300.9 $1.6 0.6%$910.2 $876.2 $34.0 3.9%

Promotion and servicing:

  

Distribution-related pay-ments

 111.4 86.1 25.3 29.3 220.7 166.0 54.7 32.9 

Distribution-related payments

 101.4 94.8 6.6 7.0 322.0 260.8 61.2 23.5 

Amortization of deferred sales commissions

 10.3 10.2 0.1 1.5 21.4 18.4 3.0 16.1  10.4 10.6 (0.2) (2.8) 31.8 29.1 2.7 9.2 

Other

 56.3 51.8 4.5 8.8 107.3 101.5 5.8 5.7  48.1 47.5 0.6 1.3 155.5 149.0 6.5 4.3 
                                  

 178.0 148.1 29.9 20.2 349.4 285.9 63.5 22.2  159.9 152.9 7.0 4.5 509.3 438.9 70.4 16.0 
                                  

General and administrative:

  

General and administrative

 104.5 129.3 (24.8) (19.2) 209.8 254.2 (44.4) (17.5) 104.8 135.7 (30.9) (22.8) 314.5 389.9 (75.4) (19.3)

Real estate charges

 1.9 6.8 (4.9) (71.5) 2.6 16.1 (13.5) (84.0) 24.1 168.1 (144.0) (85.6) 26.7 184.1 (157.4) (85.5)
                                  

 106.4 136.1 (29.7) (21.8) 212.4 270.3 (57.9) (21.4) 128.9 303.8 (174.9) (57.6) 341.2 574.0 (232.8) (40.6)
                                  

Interest

 0.8 0.9 (0.1) (11.1) 1.8 1.7 0.1 3.0  0.6 0.9 (0.3) (30.2) 2.4 2.6 (0.2) (8.2)

Amortization of intangible assets

 5.9 5.5 0.4 6.5 11.3 10.7 0.6 6.1  5.6 5.5 0.1 1.6 16.9 16.2 0.7 4.6 
                                  

Total

 $597.6 $563.4 $34.2 6.1 $1,182.6 $1,144.0 $38.6 3.4  $597.5 $764.0 $(166.5) (21.8)$1,780.0 $1,907.9 $(127.9) (6.7)
                                  

Table of Contents

        We had 3,269 full-time employees at JuneSeptember 30, 2013 compared to 3,3853,364 at JuneSeptember 30, 2012. Employee compensation and benefits consist of salaries (including severance), annual short-term incentive compensation awards (cash bonuses), annual long-term incentive compensation awards, commissions, fringe benefits and other employment costs (including recruitment, training, temporary help and meals).

        Compensation expense as a percentage of net revenues was 41.7%42.8% and 42.5% for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, compensation expense as a percentage of net revenues was 42.1%42.3% and 43.5%43.1%, respectively.


Table of Contents

Compensation expense generally is determined on a discretionary basis and is primarily a function of our firm's financial performance. Amounts are awarded to help us achieve our key compensation goals of attracting, motivating and retaining top talent, by providing awards for the past year's performance and providing incentives for future performance, while also helping ensure that our firm's Unitholdersunitholders receive an appropriate return on their investment. Senior management, with the approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of AllianceBernstein Corporation ("Compensation Committee"), confirmed that the appropriate metric to consider in determining the amount of incentive compensation is the ratio of adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense to adjusted net revenues. Adjusted net revenues used in the adjusted compensation ratio are the same as the adjusted net revenues presented as a non-GAAP measure (discussed earlier in this MD&A)Management's Discussion and Analysis). Adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense is total employee compensation and benefits expense minus other employment costs such as recruitment, training, temporary help and meals, and excludes the impact of mark-to-marketmark-to--market vesting expense, as well as dividends and interest expense, associated with employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments. Senior management, with the approval of the Compensation Committee, also established as an objective that adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense generally should not exceed 50% of our adjusted net revenues except in unexpected or unusual circumstances. Our ratios of adjusted compensation expense to adjusted net revenues were 50.0% for both the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 20132013. Our ratios for the three and 2012.nine months ended September 30, 2012 were 50.2% and 50.1%, respectively. The ratios exceeded 50% due to the incremental compensation expense recognized in the third quarter of 2012 for our CEO's extended employment agreement.

        For the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013, employee compensation and benefits expense increased $33.7$1.6 million, or 12.3%0.6%, primarily due to the net impact of higher adjusted net revenues and a slightly lower rate of $25.9$1.6 million and higher other employment costs of $1.2 million, partially offset by lower deferred compensation mark-to-market expense of $7.4$0.9 million which is the resultand lower dividends on long-term incentive compensation-related investments of mark-to-market gains in 2013 compared to mark-to-market losses during 2012.$0.3 million. For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013, employee compensation and benefits expense increased $32.3$34.0 million, or 5.6%3.9%, primarily due to the net impact of higher adjusted net revenues and a slightly lower rate of $33.1$34.7 million, higher other employment costs of $0.6 million and higher dividends on long-term incentive compensation-related investments of $0.5 million, partially offset by lower deferred compensation mark-to-market expense of $1.0$1.8 million.

        Promotion and servicing expenses include distribution-related payments to financial intermediaries for distribution of AllianceBernstein mutual funds and amortization of deferred sales commissions paid to financial intermediaries for the sale of back-end load shares of AllianceBernstein mutual funds. Also included in this expense category are costs related to travel and entertainment, advertising and promotional materials.


Table of Contents

        Promotion and servicing expenses increased $29.9$7.0 million, or 20.2%4.5%, during the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013. The increase was the result of higher distribution-related payments of $25.3$6.6 million, higher transfer fees of $0.3 million and higher trade execution and clearing costs of $1.9 million, higher transfer fees of $1.2 million and higher travel and entertainment costs of $0.8$0.1 million. During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013, promotion and servicing expenses increased $63.5$70.4 million, or 22.2%16.0%. The increase was the result of higher distribution-related payments of $54.7$61.2 million, higher trade execution and clearing costs of $3.2$3.4 million, higher amortization of deferred sales commissions of $3.0$2.7 million and higher transfer fees of $1.8 million and higher marketing costs of $1.2$2.1 million.

General and Administrative

        General and administrative expenses include technology, professional fees, occupancy, communications and similar expenses. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues were 14.5% (14.2%18.3% (14.8% excluding real estate charges) and 21.2% (20.1%42.9% (19.2% excluding real estate charges) for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. General and administrative expenses decreased $29.7$174.9 million, or 21.8%57.6%, during the secondthird quarter of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012, primarily due to lower office and relatedreal estate charges of $144.0 million, lower portfolio services expenses of $14.3$18.8 million and lower occupancy expenses of $9.4 million (excluding real estate charges), lower professional fees of $6.7 million, lower real estate charges of $4.9 million and


Table of Contents

lower portfolio services expenses of $2.7 million.. For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues were 14.7% (14.5%15.9% (14.6% excluding real estate charges) and 20.4%28.3% (19.2% excluding real estate charges), respectively. General and administrative expenses decreased $57.9$232.8 million, or 21.4%40.6%, during the first sixnine months of 2013 compared to the corresponding period in 2012, primarily due to lower office and relatedreal estate charges of $157.4 million, lower occupancy expenses of $31.1$35.9 million (excluding real estate charges), lower real estate chargesportfolio services expenses of $13.5$24.5 million and lower professional fees of $8.5 million, and lower portfolio services expenses of $5.7$7.2 million.

Income Taxes

        AllianceBernstein, a private limited partnership, is not subject to federal or state corporate income taxes, but is subject to a 4.0% New York City unincorporated business tax ("UBT"). Our domestic corporate subsidiaries are subject to federal, state and local income taxes, and are generally included in the filing of a consolidated federal income tax return. Separate state and local income tax returns also are also filed. Foreign corporate subsidiaries generally are subject to taxes in the jurisdictions where they are located.

        Income tax expense for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 increased $3.8$14.9 million from the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2012. The increase primarily is due to higher pre-tax earnings offset byas a lower effective tax rateresult of a pre-tax loss in the current yearthird quarter of 7.0% compared to 7.4% in the comparable prior year quarter.2012. Income tax expense for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 increased $8.2$23.0 million from the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2012. The increase is primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings and a higher effective tax rate in the current year of 7.9%7.6% compared to 7.0%4.0% in the prior year. The increase in the effective tax rate primarily is due to higher foreign earnings (which have higher effective tax rates) and payments relating to foreign lease assignments which are not deductible for foreign taxes.

Net Income (Loss) of Consolidated Entities Attributable to Non-Controlling Interests

        Net income (loss) of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests consists of limited partner interests owned by other investors representing 90% of the total limited partner interests in our consolidated venture capital fund. During the secondthird quarter of 2013, we had $6.4$1.4 million of net income of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests, due primarily to a $7.4$1.8 million net investment gain attributable to our consolidated venture capital fund (of which 90% belongs to non-controlling interests) and management fees of $0.2 million. During the first sixnine months of 2013, we had $4.9$6.3 million of net income of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests, primarily due to a $5.9$7.7 million net investment gain attributable to our consolidated venture capital fund and management fees of $0.5$0.7 million.


Table of Contents


CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY—JUNE 30, 2013LIQUIDITY

        During the first sixnine months of 2013, net cash provided by operating activities was $110.7$482.2 million, compared to $240.5$531.5 million during the corresponding 2012 period. The change was primarily due to a higher decrease in broker-dealer related payables (net of receivables and segregated U.S. Treasury Bills activity) of $266.3$206.0 million, a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $143.6 million, due primarily to lower real estate charges, and lower net redemptions of investments of $22.9 million, due to lower proceeds from deferred compensation redemptions, partially offset by higher cash provided by net income of $54.3$206.5 million, an increase in accrued compensation and benefits of $75.0 million, due primarily to a higher increase in the incentive compensation accrual, and lower net deferred sales commissions paid of $51.7 million and lower net purchases of investments of $15.2 million, reflecting a reduction in seed capital investments, partially offset by higher purchases of broker-dealer related investments and lower proceeds from deferred compensation-related redemptions.


Table of Contents$53.5 million.

        During the first sixnine months of 2013, net cash used in investing activities was $8.5$21.0 million, compared to $7.9$11.9 million during the corresponding 2012 period, reflecting higher net purchases of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvementsinvestments in the current period.

        During the first sixnine months of 2013, net cash used in financing activities was $146.2$477.2 million, compared to $390.3$553.9 million during the corresponding 2012 period. The change reflects the net issuance of commercial paper of $22.3 million during 2013 versus the net repayment of commercial paper of $169.7 million during 2012, lower purchases of Holding Units of $68.2$90.0 million, and an increase in overdrafts payable of $37.0$41.5 million, lower net repayments of commercial paper of $23.7 million, proceeds from bank loans of $20.0 million and additional investment by Holding with the proceeds from the exercise of compensatory options to buy Holding Units of $13.9 million, partially offset by higher distributions to the General Partner and Unitholdersunitholders of $86.6$131.4 million as a result of higher earnings (distributions on earnings are paid one quarter in arrears).

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, AllianceBernstein had $571.3$607.2 million of cash and cash equivalents, all of which is available for liquidity, but is comprised primarily of cash on deposit for our broker dealers to comply with various customer clearing activities and cash held by foreign entities for which a permanent investment election for U.S. tax purposes is taken. If the cash held at our foreign subsidiaries of $378.0$424.4 million, which includes cash on deposit for our foreign broker dealers, was to be repatriated to the U.S., we would be required to accrue and pay U.S. income taxes on these funds, based on the unremitted amount. Our current intent is to permanently reinvest these earnings outside the U.S.

Debt and Credit Facilities

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, AllianceBernstein had $346.3$143.0 million and $323.2 million, respectively, in commercial paper outstanding with weighted average interest rates of approximately 0.3%0.2% and 0.5%, respectively. The commercial paper is short term in nature, and as such, recorded value is estimated to approximate fair value. Average daily borrowings of commercial paper during the first sixnine months of 2013 and the full year 2012 were $405.3$330.6 million and $404.9 million, respectively, with weighted average interest rates of approximately 0.3% and 0.4% for both periods., respectively.

        AllianceBernstein has a $1.0 billion committed, unsecured senior revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility") with a group of commercial banks and other lenders, which matures on January 17, 2017. The Credit Facility provides for possible increases in the principal amount by up to an aggregate incremental amount of $250 million, any such increase being subject to the consent of the affected lenders. The Credit Facility is available for AllianceBernstein's and SCB LLC's business purposes, including the support of AllianceBernstein's $1.0 billion commercial paper program. Both AllianceBernstein and SCB LLC can draw directly under the Credit Facility and management expects to draw on the Credit Facility from time to time. AllianceBernstein has agreed to guarantee the obligations of SCB LLC under the Credit Facility.


Table of Contents

        The Credit Facility contains affirmative, negative and financial covenants, which are customary for facilities of this type, including, among other things, restrictions on dispositions of assets, restrictions on liens, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. We are in compliance with these covenants. The Credit Facility also includes customary events of default (with customary grace periods, as applicable), including provisions under which, upon the occurrence of an event of default, all outstanding loans may be accelerated and/or lender's commitments may be terminated. Also, under such provisions, upon the occurrence of certain insolvency- or bankruptcy-related events of default, all amounts payable under the Credit Facility would automatically become immediately due and payable, and the lender's commitments would automatically terminate.

        Amounts under the Credit Facility may be borrowed, repaid and re-borrowed by us from time to time until the maturity of the facility. Voluntary prepayments and commitment reductions requested by us are permitted at any time without fee (other than customary breakage costs relating to the prepayment of any drawn loans) upon proper notice and subject to a minimum dollar requirement.


Table of Contents

Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum, which will be, at our option, a rate equal to an applicable margin, which is subject to adjustment based on the credit ratings of AllianceBernstein, plus one of the following indexes: London Interbank Offered Rate; a floating base rate; or the Federal Funds rate.

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had no amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility. During the first sixnine months of 2013 and the full year 2012, we did not draw upon the Credit Facility.

        In addition, SCB LLC has five uncommitted lines of credit with four financial institutions. Two of these lines of credit permit us to borrow up to an aggregate of approximately $200.0 million, with AllianceBernstein named as an additional borrower, while three lines have no stated limit. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, weSCB LLC had bank loans outstanding of $20.0 million at a rate of 1.0%; there were no bank loans outstanding.outstanding as of December 31, 2012. Average daily borrowings of bank loans during the first sixnine months of 2013 and full year 2012 were $8.4$6.8 million and $18.1 million, respectively, with weighted average interest rates of approximately 1.0% and 1.3%, respectively.

        Our financial condition and access to public and private debt markets should provide adequate liquidity for our general business needs. Management believes that cash flow from operations and the issuance of debt and AllianceBernstein Units or Holding Units will provide us with the resources necessary to meet our financial obligations. See the section entitled "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements."Statements" contained in this proxy statement/prospectus.


COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

        AllianceBernstein's capital commitments, which consist primarily of operating leases for office space, are generally funded from future operating cash flows.

        During 2009, we entered into a subscription agreement under which we committed to invest up to $35 million, as amended in 2011, in a venture capital fund over a six-year period. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, we had funded $22.8$24.2 million of this commitment.

        During 2010, as general partner of AllianceBernstein U.S. Real Estate L.P. (the "Real Estate Fund"), we committed to invest $25 million in the Real Estate Fund. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, we had funded $8.7$10.6 million of this commitment.

        During 2012, we entered into an investment agreement under which we committed to invest up to $8 million in an oil and gas fund over a three-year period. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, we had funded $7.9 million of this commitment.


Table of Contents

        SeeNote 12 to AllianceBernstein'sthe unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus for discussion of contingencies.prospectus.


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

        The preparation of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and notes to condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.

        There have been no updates to our critical accounting estimates from those disclosed below in Management's Discussion and Analysis for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012.


ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

        SeeNote 2 to AllianceBernstein'sthe unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of AllianceBernstein contained in this proxy statement/prospectus.


Table of Contents

        Percentage change figures are calculated using assets under management rounded to the nearest million and financial statement amounts rounded to the nearest thousand.

        We made significant progress in stabilizing our business in 2012, and demonstrated improvement in a number of areas of our business. In the fourth quarter, our total net flows turned positive for the first time since before the financial crisis, due to a second consecutive $5 billion-plus net inflow quarter in Retail and our first net flow positive quarter in Institutions since the first quarter of 2008. Our Fixed Income services continued to outperform their benchmarks during the fourth quarter, as did many of our core Growth and Value Equity services.

        These results conclude a year during which we were successful in executing our long-term strategy to improve our investment performance, diversify our business, innovate for clients with our offerings and strengthen our financial condition. In Fixed Income, we finished 2012 with approximately 89% of our assets in strategies that outperformed their benchmarks for the three-year period. In Equities, our Global, International, Emerging Markets and U.S. Strategic Value strategies significantly outperformed their benchmarks in the fourth quarter of 2012, while Growth strategies such as U.S. Thematic, and U.S. Large and Small Cap Growth outperformed their benchmarks for the full year, and stability services such as Select U.S. Equity and Global Market Neutral beat benchmarks across multiple time periods.

        Our total AUM as of December 31, 2012 were $430.0 billion, up $24.1 billion, or 5.9%, during 2012. The increase in AUM was driven by market appreciation of $38.5 billion and $16.2 billion of net inflows in the Retail channel, partially offset by net outflows of $21.6 billion and $9.0 billion in the Institutions and Private Client channels, respectively.

        Institutional AUM decreased $4.1 billion, or 1.8%, to $219.8 billion during 2012. The decrease in AUM resulted from net outflows of $21.6 billion, partially offset by market appreciation of $17.6 billion. Gross sales increased $4.0 billion, or 23.2%, from $17.3 billion in 2011 to $21.3 billion in 2012. In addition, redemptions and terminations decreased $14.0 billion, or 26.4%, from $52.8 billion in 2011 to $38.8 billion in 2012. The pipeline of awarded but unfunded Institutional mandates was $8.0 billion as of year-end 2012, compared with $4.3 billion as of year-end 2011. We completed nearly 400 requests for proposals during 2012 across diverse fixed income and equity services—an 18% annual increase. Fixed Income is driving our improvement in this important business, but clients increasingly ask us about our equity, alternatives and multi-asset strategies.


Table of Contents

        Retail AUM increased $31.8 billion, or 28.2%, to $144.4 billion during 2012, resulting from net inflows of $16.2 billion and market appreciation of $15.5 billion. Gross sales increased $25.3 billion, or 81.7%, from $31.0 billion in 2011 to record annual gross sales of $56.3 billion in 2012 as a result of strong sales in Fixed Income products and significant sales increases from all geographic regions. Our strength was particularly pronounced in Asia Ex-Japan, where we won 23 awards for both performance and innovation in 2012, and where we command leading local market shares by AUM in Taiwan and Hong Kong.

        Private Client AUM decreased $3.6 billion, or 5.2%, to $65.8 billion during 2012. The decrease in AUM was driven by net outflows of $9.0 billion, offset by market appreciation of $5.4 billion. Gross sales decreased $3.0 billion, or 41.5%, from $7.3 billion in 2011 to $4.3 billion in 2012. During 2012, we enhanced our fully diversified investment offering to better meet client needs by introducing Strategic Equities, a new multi-style, all-cap approach to equity investment that captures our highest conviction ideas, and providing broader client access to alternatives through a fund-of-hedge-funds registered investment company.


Table of Contents

        Bernstein Research Services revenue decreased $23.7 million, or 5.4% to $413.7 million in 2012, as a result of a significant decline in market trading volumes, partially offset by market share gains.

        Our full year 2012 revenues decreased $13.2 million, or 0.5%, to $2,736.7 million in 2012. The decrease was driven by lower investment advisory base fees of $194.3 million and lower Bernstein Research Services revenue of $23.7 million, offset by investments gains in 2012 compared to losses in 2011 resulting in a positive net impact of $111.3 million, higher performance-based fees of $50.1 million and higher distribution revenues of $50.1 million. Full year 2012 operating expenses decreased $424.0 million, or 14.3% to $2,534.4 million in 2012, due to the one-time long-term incentive compensation charge of $587.1 million recorded in 2011, lower employee compensation and benefits expense of $78.3 million (excluding the compensation charge) and lower office and related expenses of $32.8 million (excluding the real estate charges), offset by higher real estate charges of $215.8 million (discussed below) and higher promotion and servicing expenses of $50.0 million.

        Finally, we improved our firm's operating leverage, finishing the year on schedule in executing our global real estate consolidation plan and anticipated related cost savings. With this and other firm-wide rationalization efforts, we increased our adjusted operating margin by 1.8 percentage points in 2012, to 18.8%, and achieved a second-half margin of 20.4%.

        Assets under management by distribution channel were as follows:

 
 As of December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in billions)
  
  
 

Institutions

 $219.8 $223.9 $272.9  (1.8)% (18.0)%

Retail

  144.4  112.6  127.0  28.2  (11.4)

Private Client

  65.8  69.4  78.1  (5.2) (11.1)
              

Total

 $430.0 $405.9 $478.0  5.9  (15.1)
              

Table of Contents

        Assets under management by investment service were as follows:

 
 As of December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in billions)
  
  
 

Equity

                

Value:

                

U.S. 

 $19.0 $25.2 $37.8  (24.6)% (33.5)%

Global and International

  38.1  55.6  106.5  (31.5) (47.8)
              

  57.1  80.8  144.3  (29.3) (44.0)
              

Growth:

                

U.S. 

  21.6  21.8  30.3  (1.4) (28.0)

Global and International

  17.8  22.4  44.0  (20.2) (49.1)
              

  39.4  44.2  74.3  (10.9) (40.5)
              

Total Equity

  96.5  125.0  218.6  (22.8) (42.8)
              

Fixed Income:

                

U.S. 

  133.5  127.4  119.0  4.8  7.0 

Global and International

  122.1  90.2  87.2  35.3  3.5 
              

  255.6  217.6  206.2  17.5  5.5 
              

Other(1):

                

U.S. 

  33.1  29.6  28.7  11.7  3.2 

Global and International

  44.8  33.7  24.5  33.2  37.6 
              

  77.9  63.3  53.2  23.1  19.1 
              

Total:

                

U.S. 

  207.2  204.0  215.8  1.5  (5.5)

Global and International

  222.8  201.9  262.2  10.4  (23.0)
              

Total

 $430.0 $405.9 $478.0  5.9  (15.1)
              

(1)
Includes index, structured, asset allocation services and certain other alternative investments.

Table of Contents

        Changes in assets under management during 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

 
 Distribution Channel Investment Service 
 
 Institutions Retail Private
Client
 Total Value
Equity
 Growth
Equity
 Fixed
Income
 Other(1) Total 
 
 (in billions)
 

Balance as of December 31, 2011

 $223.9 $112.6 $69.4 $405.9 $80.8 $44.2 $217.6 $63.3 $405.9 

Long-term flows:

                            

Sales/new accounts

  21.3  56.3  4.3  81.9  5.2  5.0  62.4  9.3  81.9 

Redemptions/terminations

  (38.8) (33.0) (10.9) (82.7) (32.0) (14.3) (33.8) (2.6) (82.7)

Cash flow/unreinvested dividends

  (4.1) (7.1) (2.4) (13.6) (5.7) (1.6) (6.0) (0.3) (13.6)
                    

Net long-term (outflows) inflows

  (21.6) 16.2  (9.0) (14.4) (32.5) (10.9) 22.6  6.4  (14.4)

Transfers

  (0.1) 0.1               

Market appreciation

  17.6  15.5  5.4  38.5  8.8  6.1  15.4  8.2  38.5 
                    

Net change

  (4.1) 31.8  (3.6) 24.1  (23.7) (4.8) 38.0  14.6  24.1 
                    

Balance as of December 31, 2012

 $219.8 $144.4 $65.8 $430.0 $57.1 $39.4 $255.6 $77.9 $430.0 
                    

Balance as of December 31, 2010

 $272.9 $127.0 $78.1 $478.0 $144.3 $74.3 $206.2 $53.2 $478.0 

Long-term flows:

                            

Sales/new accounts

  17.3  31.0  7.3  55.6  6.5  5.2  31.4  12.5  55.6 

Redemptions/terminations

  (52.8) (34.8) (9.5) (97.1) (43.3) (24.7) (27.8) (1.3) (97.1)

Cash flow/unreinvested dividends

  (9.3) (7.1) (4.6) (21.0) (13.1) (6.3) (0.4) (1.2) (21.0)
                    

Net long-term (outflows) inflows

  (44.8) (10.9) (6.8) (62.5) (49.9) (25.8) 3.2  10.0  (62.5)

Transfers

  0.1    (0.1)            

Acquisitions

  1.1  0.2  0.1  1.4    1.2  0.2    1.4 

Market (depreciation) appreciation

  (5.4) (3.7) (1.9) (11.0) (13.6) (5.5) 8.0  0.1  (11.0)
                    

Net change

  (49.0) (14.4) (8.7) (72.1) (63.5) (30.1) 11.4  10.1  (72.1)
                    

Balance as of December 31, 2011

 $223.9 $112.6 $69.4 $405.9 $80.8 $44.2 $217.6 $63.3 $405.9 
                    

(1)
Includes index, structured, asset allocation services and certain other alternative investments.

        Average assets under management by distribution channel and investment service were as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in billions)
  
  
 

Distribution Channel:

                

Institutions

 $218.9 $252.6 $277.1  (13.3)% (8.8)%

Retail

  128.2  124.0  122.8  3.4  1.0 

Private Client

  68.9  75.3  74.7  (8.6) 0.9 
              

Total

 $416.0 $451.9 $474.6  (8.0) (4.8)
              

Investment Service:

                

Value Equity

 $69.5 $117.2 $153.5  (40.7)% (23.6)%

Growth Equity

  41.1  61.0  81.3  (32.6) (25.0)

Fixed Income

  235.2  214.0  198.9  9.9  7.6 

Other(1)

  70.2  59.7  40.9  17.7  46.0 
              

Total

 $416.0 $451.9 $474.6  (8.0) (4.8)
              

(1)
Includes index, structured, asset allocation services and certain other alternative investments.

        Our Institutions AUM decreased $4.1 billion to $219.8 billion, resulting in average AUM of $218.9 billion for 2012. The $4.1 billion decline in AUM during 2012 was primarily due to $21.6 billion


Table of Contents

of net outflows (consisting of net outflows of $31.8 billion in Value and Growth Equity services, offset by net inflows of $8.2 billion and $2.0 billion in Fixed Income services and Other services, respectively), offset by market appreciation of $17.6 billion. During 2011, Institutional AUM decreased $49.0 billion to $223.9 billion, resulting in average AUM of $252.6 billion for 2011. The $49.0 billion decrease in AUM during 2011 was primarily due to $44.8 billion of net outflows (consisting of net outflows of $54.5 billion in Value and Growth Equity services, partly offset by net inflows of $9.7 billion in Fixed Income services and Other services) and market depreciation of $5.4 billion.

        Our Retail AUM increased $31.8 billion to $144.4 billion, resulting in average AUM of $128.2 billion for 2012. The $31.8 billion increase in AUM during 2012 was primarily due to $16.2 billion of net inflows (consisting of net inflows of $18.5 billion and $4.2 billion in Fixed Income services and Other services, respectively, offset by outflows of $6.5 billion in Value and Growth Equity services) and market appreciation of $15.5 billion. During 2011, Retail AUM decreased $14.4 billion to $112.6 billion, resulting in average AUM of $124.0 billion for 2011. The $14.4 billion decrease in AUM during 2011 was primarily due to $10.9 billion of net outflows (consisting of net outflows of $14.2 billion in Value and Growth Equity services, offset by net inflows of $3.3 billion in Fixed Income services and Other services) and market depreciation of $3.7 billion.

        Our Private Client AUM decreased $3.6 billion to $65.8 billion, resulting in average AUM of $68.9 billion for 2012. The $3.6 billion decrease in AUM during 2012 was due to $9.0 billion of net outflows (consisting of net outflows of $5.2 billion in Value and Growth Equity services and $4.0 billion in Fixed Income services, offset by inflows of $0.2 billion in Other services), offset by market appreciation of $5.4 billion. During 2011, Private Client AUM decreased $8.7 billion to $69.4 billion, resulting in average AUM of $75.3 billion. The $8.7 billion decrease in AUM during 2011 was due to $6.8 billion of net outflows (consisting of net outflows within all services, except Other services) and market depreciation of $1.9 billion.

        Absolute investment composite returns, net of fees, and relative performance compared to benchmarks for certain representative Institutional (except as otherwise indicated) Value, Growth,


Table of Contents

Blend (our core equities services) and Fixed Income services were as follows for the years ended December 31:

 
 2012 2011 2010 

Global High Income (fixed income)

          

Absolute return

  18.4% 2.0% 17.7%

Relative return (vs. 33% Barclays High Yield, 33% JPM EMBI Global and 33% JPM GBI-EM)

  0.2  (0.3) 4.2 

Global Fixed Income (fixed income)

          

Absolute return

  3.9  12.1  6.8 

Relative return (vs. CITI WLD GV BD-USD/JPM GLBL BD)

  2.2  5.7  1.6 

Intermediate Municipal Bonds (fixed income)(Private Client composite)

          

Absolute return

  3.4  7.2  2.9 

Relative return (vs. Lipper Short/Int. Blended Muni Fund Avg)

  (0.3) 0.8  0.9 

U.S. Strategic Core Plus (fixed income)

          

Absolute return

  5.9  7.1  9.5 

Relative return (vs. Barclays U.S. Aggregate)

  1.7  (0.7) 2.9 

Emerging Market Debt (fixed income)

          

Absolute return

  20.5  6.0  14.7 

Relative return (vs. JPM EMBI Global/JPM EMBI)

  2.0  (2.5) 2.7 

Global Plus (fixed income)

          

Absolute return

  5.2  6.2  8.3 

Relative return (vs. Barclays Global Aggregate)

  0.9  0.6  2.8 

Emerging Markets Value

          

Absolute return

  14.7  (23.3) 15.2 

Relative return (vs. MSCI EM Index)

  (3.5) (4.9) (3.7)

Global Value

          

Absolute return

  13.9  (15.8) 6.5 

Relative return (vs. MSCI World Index)

  (1.9) (10.3) (5.3)

International Value

          

Absolute return

  12.9  (18.6) 3.4 

Relative return (vs. MSCI EAFE Index)

  (4.4) (6.5) (4.4)

U.S. Small & Mid Cap Value

          

Absolute return

  18.6  (8.1) 26.1 

Relative return (vs. Russell 2500 Value Index)

  (0.6) (4.8) 1.3 

U.S. Strategic Value

          

Absolute return

  13.3  (7.6) 11.3 

Relative return (vs. Russell 1000 Value Index)

  (4.2) (8.0) (4.2)

U.S. Small Cap Growth

          

Absolute return

  14.9  4.4  37.1 

Relative return (vs. Russell 2000 Growth Index)

  0.3  7.3  8.0 

U.S. Large Cap Growth

          

Absolute return

  15.9  (2.3) 9.8 

Relative return (vs. Russell 1000 Growth Index)

  0.6  (4.9) (6.9)

U.S. Strategic Growth(Private Client composite)

          

Absolute return

  15.2  (4.3) 7.4 

Relative return (vs. S&P 500 Index)

  (0.8) (6.4) (7.7)

Select U.S. Equity

          

Absolute return

  16.2  3.8  19.8 

Relative return (vs. S&P 500 Index)

  0.2  1.7  4.7 

International Style Blend—Developed

          

Absolute return

  15.6  (17.7) 3.1 

Relative return (vs. MSCI EAFE Index)

  (1.7) (5.6) (4.7)

Table of Contents

        Our Fixed Income services generally outperformed their benchmarks in 2012. Numerous sources of uncertainty adversely affected the global economy throughout the year, but risk aversion eased in the second half of the year, due to monetary-policy actions and improving perceptions regarding sovereign-debt crises in Europe, fiscal policies in the U.S. and growth in China. Sector and security selection were generally the biggest drivers of our outperformance. Non-government bond exposures, particularly corporate bonds, contributed to positive returns in our U.S. taxable and global multi-sector portfolios.

        Our U.S. and Global value services outperformed their benchmarks for the three-month period ending December 31, 2012, but mostly lagged for the full year. In contrast, our U.S. large and small cap growth services lagged somewhat in the fourth quarter, but finished ahead of their benchmarks for the full year. We attribute this performance pattern to our services' adherence to their core investment disciplines. Long-term value characteristics, such as inexpensive cash flows, came back into favor late in 2012 after a long period in which more short-term oriented equity markets had not rewarded these characteristics. Long-term growth characteristics, such as underappreciated growth potential, underperformed in the fourth quarter. Our core research approach has not wavered; we believe that staying true to our investment disciplines is in our clients' best interests over the long term.

 
 Years Ended December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in millions, except per unit
amounts)

  
  
 

Net revenues

 $2,736.7 $2,749.9 $2,948.6  (0.5)% (6.7)%

Expenses

  2,534.4  2,958.4  2,489.7  (14.3) 18.8 
              

Operating income (loss)

  202.3  (208.5) 458.9  n/m  n/m 

Non-operating income

      6.7    (100.0)
              

Income (loss) before income taxes

  202.3  (208.5) 465.6  n/m  n/m 

Income taxes

  13.7  3.1  38.5  344.3  (92.0)
              

Net income (loss)

  188.6  (211.6) 427.1  n/m  n/m 

Net income (loss) of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests

  (0.3) (36.8) (15.3) (99.1) 140.2 
              

Net income (loss) attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $188.9 $(174.8)$442.4  n/m  n/m 
              

Diluted net income (loss) per AllianceBernstein Unit

 $0.67 $(0.62)$1.58  n/m  n/m 
              

Distributions per AllianceBernstein Unit (1)(2)

 $1.36 $1.38 $1.58  (1.4) (12.7)
              

Operating margin(3)

  7.4% n/m  16.1%      
              

(1)
The 2012 distribution excludes the impact of $207.0 million of non-cash real estate charges recorded in the third and fourth quarters of 2012.

(2)
The 2011 distribution excludes the impact of the $587.1 million one-time, non-cash long-term incentive compensation charge.

(3)
Operating income excluding net (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interests as a percentage of net revenues.

Table of Contents

        Net income attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $188.9 million, as compared to net loss attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders of $174.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The change was primarily due to (in millions):

Higher real estate charges

 $(215.8)

Lower base advisory fees

  (194.3)

Lower Bernstein Research Services revenues

  (23.7)

2011 long-term incentive compensation charge

  587.1 

Lower employee compensation and benefits (excluding $587.1 million compensation charge)

  78.3 

Higher performance-based fees

  50.1 

Higher long-term incentive compensation investment gains

  37.0 

Seed capital investment gains compared to 2011 losses

  28.2 

Lower other promotion and servicing expenses

  17.0 

Other

  (0.2)
    

 $363.7 
    

        Net loss attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $174.8 million, as compared to net income attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders of $442.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The change was primarily due to (in millions):

2011 long-term incentive compensation charge

 $(587.1)

Lower investment advisory base fees

  (131.3)

Long-term incentive compensation investment losses compared to 2010 gains

  (47.4)

Higher other promotion and servicing expenses

  (25.5)

Seed money investment losses compared to 2010 gains

  (12.4)

Higher portfolio services

  (9.8)

Lower real estate charges

  94.5 

Lower employee compensation and benefits (excluding $587.1 million compensation charge)

  73.6 

Lower income tax expense

  35.4 

2011 insurance proceeds

  10.7 

Other

  (17.9)
    

 $(617.2)
    

        Since the fourth quarter of 2008, we consistently have taken steps to reduce our cost structure, including headcount reductions, and the consolidation of office locations, in response to declines in our AUM and fee revenues.

        During 2010, we performed a comprehensive review of our real estate requirements in New York in connection with our workforce reductions commencing in 2008. As a result, during 2010 we decided to sub-lease over 380,000 square feet in New York (approximately 80% of this space has been sublet) and largely consolidate our New York-based employees into two office locations from three. We recorded pre-tax real estate charges of $101.7 million in 2010 that reflected the net present value of the difference between the amount of our ongoing contractual operating lease obligations for this space and our estimate of current market rental rates ($76.2 million), as well as the write-off of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment related to this space ($25.5 million). We periodically review the assumptions and estimates we used in recording these charges.


Table of Contents

        During 2011, we recorded pre-tax real estate charges totaling $7.2 million for our office space in London, England, New York and other U.S. locations. The London charge was $8.8 million, consisting of a $5.8 million payment to the party to which the lease was assigned, as well as the write-off of $3.0 million of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment related to the space. We also wrote off an additional $1.5 million of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment related to the New York space and had miscellaneous charges of $0.4 million. These charges were offset by a $3.5 million credit we recorded in 2011 due to changes in estimates of our 2010 charge.

        During the first six months of 2012, we recorded pre-tax real estate charges totaling $16.1 million, reflecting $8.8 million resulting from the abandonment of our leased New York City Data Center office space and $7.3 million resulting from a change in estimates relating to previously recorded real estate charges. The New York City Data Center charge consisted of the net present value of the difference between the amount of ongoing contractual operating lease obligations for this space and our estimate of current market rental rates ($7.1 million) and the write-off of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment related to this space ($1.7 million).

        During the third quarter of 2012, in an effort to further reduce our global real estate footprint, we completed a comprehensive review of our worldwide office locations and began implementing a global space consolidation plan. As a result, our intention is to sub-lease approximately 510,000 square feet of office space, over 70% of which is New York office space (in addition to the 380,000 square feet written-off in 2010), with the remainder comprised of office space in London, England, Melbourne, Australia and various U.S. locations. We expect that the actions we are taking to vacate and market space for sublease will result over time in projected non-cash real estate charges of $225 million to $250 million, with the bulk of the charges having occurred in the third and fourth quarters of 2012. These charges are in addition to the earlier non-cash real estate charges for New York City office space we recorded, and they will not affect our future quarterly distributions. We ultimately expect to realize reduced annual operating expenses of $38 million to $43 million once we have successfully subleased the vacated space. These projections are based on current market conditions and could change over time as conditions evolve. We believe implementing our global space consolidation plan will meaningfully improve our cost structure and will play an important part in positioning our firm for a stronger future.

        During the third quarter of 2012, we recorded pre-tax real estate charges of $168.1 million, reflecting the net present value of the difference between the amount of our ongoing contractual operating lease obligations for this space and our estimate of current market rental rates ($131.8 million), as well as the write-off of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment related to this space ($31.3 million), and changes in estimates relating to previously recorded real estate charges ($5.0 million).

        During the fourth quarter of 2012, we recorded pre-tax real estate charges of $38.9 million, reflecting the net present value of the difference between the amount of our ongoing contractual operating lease obligations for this space and our estimate of current market rental rates ($32.0 million), as well as the write-off of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment related to this space ($8.4 million), offset by changes in estimates relating to previously recorded real estate charges of ($1.5 million).

        During the fourth quarter of 2011, we implemented changes to our employee long-term incentive compensation award program to ensure that our compensation practices are competitive, and to better align the costs of employee compensation and benefits with the company's current year financial performance and provide employees with a higher degree of certainty that they will receive the incentive compensation they are awarded. We amended all outstanding year-end long-term incentive


Table of Contents

compensation awards of active employees (i.e., those employees who we employed as of December 31, 2011), so that employees who terminate their employment or are terminated without cause may retain their awards, subject to compliance with certain agreements and restrictive covenants set forth in the applicable award agreement, including restrictions on competition and employee and client solicitation, and a claw-back for failing to follow existing risk management policies. Most equity replacement, sign-on or similar long-term incentive compensation awards included in separate employment agreements or arrangements were not amended in 2011 to reflect these changes.

        We recognize compensation expense related to equity compensation grants in the financial statements using the fair value method. Fair value of restricted Holding Unit awards is the closing price of a Holding Unit on the grant date; fair value of options is determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Under the fair value method, compensatory expense is measured at the grant date based on the estimated fair value of the award and is recognized over the required service period. Prior to the changes made to the employee long-term incentive compensation award program in the fourth quarter of 2011, an employee's service requirement was typically the same as the delivery dates. These changes eliminated employee service requirements but did not modify delivery dates contained in the original award agreements.

        As a result of these changes, we recorded a one-time, non-cash charge of $587.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 for all unrecognized long-term incentive compensation on the amended outstanding awards from prior years. In addition, we recorded 100% of the expense associated with our 2011 long-term incentive compensation awards of $159.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2011.

        Awards granted in 2011 contained the provisions described above, as did awards granted in 2012, and we expect to include these provisions in long-term incentive compensation awards in future years. Accordingly, our annual incentive compensation expense will reflect 100% of the expense associated with the long-term incentive compensation awarded in each year. This approach to expense recognition will more closely match the economic cost of awarding long-term incentive compensation to the period in which the related service is performed.

        We engage in open-market purchases of Holding Units to help fund anticipated obligations under our incentive compensation award program and for other corporate purposes, and purchase Holding Units from employees to allow them to fulfill statutory tax withholding requirements at the time of distribution of long-term incentive compensation awards. During 2012 and 2011, we purchased 15.7 million and 13.5 million Holding Units for $238.0 million and $220.8 million, respectively. These amounts reflect open-market purchases of 12.3 million and 11.1 million Holding Units for $182.3 million and $192.1 million, respectively, with the remainder relating to purchases of Holding Units from employees to allow them to fulfill statutory tax withholding requirements at the time of distribution of long-term incentive compensation awards, offset by Holding Units purchased by employees as part of a distribution reinvestment election.

        Since the third quarter of 2011, we have implemented plans each quarter to repurchase Holding Units pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act. A Rule 10b5-1 plan allows a company to repurchase its shares at times when it otherwise might be prevented from doing so because of self-imposed trading blackout periods and because it possesses material non-public information. Each broker we have selected has the authority under the terms and limitations specified in the plan to repurchase Holding Units on our behalf in accordance with the terms of the plan. Repurchases are subject to SEC regulations as well as certain price, market volume and timing constraints specified in the plan. The plan adopted during the fourth quarter of 2012 did not specify an aggregate limitation and expired at the close of business on February 11, 2013. We intend to adopt additional Rule 10b5-1 plans so that we can continue to engage in open-market purchases of Holding Units to help fund


Table of Contents

anticipated obligations under our incentive compensation award programs and for other corporate purposes.

        We granted to employees and Eligible Directors 12.1 million restricted Holding Unit awards (including 2.7 million granted in June 2012 to Peter Kraus, our Chief Executive Officer (see"Employee Compensation and Benefits" in this Management's Discussion and Analysis) and 8.7 million granted in January 2012 for 2011 year-end awards) and 1.7 million restricted Holding Unit awards during 2012 and 2011, respectively. To fund these awards, we allocated previously repurchased Holding Units that had been held in the consolidated rabbi trust. The 2012 and 2011 long-term incentive compensation awards allowed most employees to allocate their award between restricted Holding Units and deferred cash. As a result, 6.5 million restricted Holding Unit awards for the December 2012 awards and 8.7 million restricted Holding Unit awards for the December 2011 awards were awarded and allocated as such within the consolidated rabbi trust in January 2013 and 2012, respectively. There were approximately 17.9 million and 12.0 million unallocated Holding Units remaining in the consolidated rabbi trust as of December 31, 2012 and January 31, 2013, respectively. The balance as of January 31, 2013 also reflects repurchases and other activity during January 2013.

        We are required to distribute all of our Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement, to its Unitholders (including the General Partner). Typically in the past, Available Cash Flow has been the diluted earnings per unit for the quarter multiplied by the number of general and limited partnership interests at the end of the quarter, except when, as was the case with the compensation-related charge in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the real estate charge in the third quarter of 2012, the effects of the non-cash charges were eliminated. Starting in the third quarter of 2012, Available Cash Flow is the adjusted diluted net income per unit for the quarter multiplied by the number of general and limited partnership interests at the end of the quarter. In future periods, management anticipates that Available Cash Flow typically will be based on adjusted diluted net income per unit, unless management determines that one or more non-GAAP adjustments should not be made with respect to the Available Cash Flow calculation. SeeNote 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus for a description of Available Cash Flow.

        We are providing the non-GAAP measures "adjusted net revenues," "adjusted operating income" and "adjusted operating margin" because they are the principal operating metrics management uses in evaluating and comparing period-to-period operating performance and we believe they are useful to investors. Management principally uses these metrics in evaluating performance because they present a clearer picture of our operating performance, and allow management to see long-term trends without the distortion primarily caused by long-term incentive compensation-related mark-to-market adjustments, real estate consolidation charges and other adjustment items. Similarly, these management operating metrics help investors better understand the underlying trends in our results and, accordingly, we believe they provide a valuable perspective for investors.

        These non-GAAP measures are provided in addition to, and not as substitutes for, net revenues, operating income and operating margin, and they may not be comparable to non-GAAP measures presented by other companies. Management uses both the GAAP and non-GAAP measures in


Table of Contents

evaluating our financial performance. The non-GAAP measures alone may pose limitations because they do not include all of our revenues and expenses.

 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Net revenues, GAAP basis

 $2,736,737 $2,749,891 $2,948,557 

Exclude:

          

Long-term incentive compensation-related investment (gains) losses

  (16,711) 20,302  (27,053)

Long-term incentive compensation-related dividends and interest

  (2,245) (4,364) (6,513)

90% of consolidated venture capital fund investment (gains) losses

  (1,118) 35,778  16,527 

Distribution-related payments

  (367,090) (302,684) (286,676)

Amortization of deferred sales commissions

  (40,262) (37,675) (47,397)

Pass-through fees and expenses

  (49,010) (35,103) (32,684)
        

Adjusted net revenues

 $2,260,301 $2,426,145 $2,564,761 
        

Operating income (loss), GAAP basis

 $202,365 $(208,469)$458,862 

Exclude:

          

Long-term incentive compensation-related investment (gains) losses

  (16,711) 20,302  (27,053)

Long-term incentive compensation-related dividends and interest

  (2,245) (4,364) (6,513)

Long-term incentive compensation-related mark-to-market vesting expense (credit)

  14,858  (19,425) 2,791 

Long-term incentive compensation-related dividends and interest expense

  2,590  5,054  8,540 

2011 long-term incentive compensation charge

    587,131   
        

Net impact of long-term incentive compensation-related items

  (1,508) 588,698  (22,235)
        

Insurance proceeds

    (10,691)  

Real estate charges

  223,038  7,235  101,698 
        

Sub-total of non-GAAP adjustments

  221,530  585,242  79,463 

Less: Net (loss) income of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests

  (315) (36,799) (15,320)
        

Adjusted operating income

 $424,210 $413,572 $553,645 
        

Adjusted operating margin

  18.8% 17.0% 21.6%

        Adjusted operating income for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased $10.6 million, or 2.6%, from the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily as a result of lower employee compensation expense (excluding the impact of long-term incentive compensation-related items) of $110.1 million, lower general and administrative expenses (excluding real estate charges) of $52.0 million, higher investment gains of $37.4 million and higher performance-based fees of $32.1 million, offset by lower base advisory fees of $192.4 million and lower Bernstein Research Services revenues of $23.7 million. Adjusted operating income for the year ended December 31, 2011 decreased $140.1 million, or 25.3%, from the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily as a result of lower investment advisory fees of $136.2 million, higher seed money losses of $12.4 million, higher general and administrative expenses (excluding real estate charges) of $27.1 million and higher other promotion and servicing expenses of


Table of Contents

$23.9 million, partially offset by higher Bernstein Research Services revenues of $6.9 million and lower employee compensation expense (excluding the impact of long-term incentive compensation-related items) of $48.0 million.

Adjusted Net Revenues

        Adjusted net revenues exclude investment gains and losses and dividends and interest on long-term incentive compensation-related investments, and 90% of the investment gains and losses of our consolidated venture capital fund attributable to non-controlling interests. In addition, adjusted net revenues offset distribution-related payments to third parties as well as amortization of deferred sales commissions against distribution revenues. We believe the offset of distribution-related payments from net revenues is useful for our investors and other users of our financial statements because such presentation appropriately reflects the nature of these costs as pass-through payments to third parties who perform functions on behalf of our sponsored mutual funds and/or shareholders of these funds. Amortization of deferred sales commissions is offset against net revenues because such costs, over time, essentially offset distribution revenues earned by the company. We also exclude additional pass-through expenses we incur (primarily through our transfer agency) that are reimbursed and recorded as fees in revenues. During 2012, we offset sub-advisory payments to third parties against performance-based fees earned on the Public-Private Investment Program ("PPIP") fund we managed. These fees have no impact on operating income, but they do have an impact on our operating margin. As such, we exclude these fees from adjusted net revenues.

Adjusted Operating Income

        Adjusted operating income represents operating income on a GAAP basis excluding (1) the impact on net revenues and compensation expense of the mark-to-market gains and losses (as well as the dividends and interest) associated with employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments, (2) the 2011 compensation charge, (3) real estate charges, (4) insurance proceeds, and (5) the net loss or income of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests.

        Prior to 2009, a large proportion of employee compensation was in the form of long-term incentive compensation awards that were notionally invested in AllianceBernstein investment services and generally vested over a period of four years. AllianceBernstein has economically hedged the exposure to market movements by purchasing and holding these investments on its balance sheet. The full value of the investments' appreciation (depreciation) is recorded within investment gains and losses on the income statement in the current period. U.S. GAAP requires the appreciation (depreciation) in the compensation liability to be expensed over the award vesting period in proportion to the vested amount of the award as part of compensation expense. This creates a timing difference between the recognition of the compensation expense and the investment gain or loss impacting operating income, which will fluctuate over the life of the award and net to zero at the end of the multi-year vesting period. Although during periods of high market volatility these timing differences have an impact on operating income and operating margin, over the life of the award any impact is ultimately offset. Because these plans are economically hedged, management believes it is useful to reflect the offset ultimately achieved from hedging the investments' market exposure in the calculation of adjusted operating income, adjusted operating margin and adjusted diluted net income per Holding Unit, which will produce core operating results from period to period. The non-GAAP measures exclude gains and losses and dividends and interest on long-term incentive compensation-related investments included in revenues and compensation expense, thus eliminating the timing differences created by different treatment under U.S. GAAP of the market movement on the expense and the investments. In the fourth quarter of 2011, we implemented changes to our employee long-term incentive compensation award program. As a result, mark-to-market investment gains or losses recognized in compensation expense will closely approximate mark-to-market investment gains and losses recognized in revenues.

        Real estate charges have been excluded because they are not considered part of our core operating results when comparing financial results from period to period and to industry peers.


Table of Contents

        In the third quarter of 2011, we received significant insurance proceeds from the settlement of a claim that are not considered part of our core operating results.

        Most of the net income or loss of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests relates to the 90% limited partner interests held by third parties in our consolidated venture capital fund. We own a 10% limited partner interest in the fund. Because we are the general partner of the venture capital fund and are deemed to have a controlling interest, U.S. GAAP requires us to consolidate the financial results of the fund. However, recognizing 100% of the gains or losses in operating income while only retaining 10% is not reflective of our underlying financial results at the operating income level. As a result, we are excluding the 90% limited partner interests we do not own from our adjusted operating income. Similarly, net income of joint ventures attributable to non-controlling interests, although not significant, is excluded because it does not reflect the economic interest attributable to AllianceBernstein.

Adjusted Operating Margin

        Adjusted operating margin allows us to monitor our financial performance and efficiency from period to period and to compare our performance to industry peers without the volatility noted above in our discussion of adjusted operating income. Adjusted operating margin is derived by dividing adjusted operating income by adjusted net revenues.

        The following table summarizes the components of net revenues:

 
 Years Ended December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in millions)
  
  
 

Investment advisory and services fees:

                

Institutions:

                

Base fees

 $426.0 $600.2 $745.5  (29.0)% (19.5)%

Performance-based fees

  59.3  16.0  18.7  271.1  (14.4)
              

  485.3  616.2  764.2  (21.2) (19.4)
              

Retail:

                

Base fees

  702.3  652.5  639.8  7.6  2.0 

Performance-based fees

  2.9    0.1  n/m  (100.0)
              

  705.2  652.5  639.9  8.1  2.0 
              

Private Client:

                

Base fees

  577.3  647.2  645.9  (10.8) 0.2 

Performance-based fees

  4.4  0.5  1.7  658.6  (66.8)
              

  581.7  647.7  647.6  (10.2)  
              

Total:

                

Base fees

  1,705.6  1,899.9  2,031.2  (10.2) (6.5)

Performance-based fees

  66.6  16.5  20.5  302.6  (19.4)

  1,772.2  1,916.4  2,051.7  (7.5) (6.6)

Bernstein research services

  413.7  437.4  430.5  (5.4) 1.6 

Distribution revenues

  401.7  351.6  338.6  14.2  3.8 

Dividend and interest income

  21.3  21.5  22.9  (1.0) (6.1)

Investment gains (losses)

  29.2  (82.1) (1.4) n/m  n/m 

Other revenues

  101.8  107.6  109.8  (5.4) (2.0)
              

Total revenues

  2,739.9  2,752.4  2,952.1  (0.5) (6.8)

Less: Interest expense

  3.2  2.5  3.5  26.4  (28.1)
              

Net revenues

 $2,736.7 $2,749.9 $2,948.6  (0.5) (6.7)
              

Table of Contents

Investment Advisory and Services Fees

        Investment advisory and services fees are the largest component of our revenues. These fees are generally calculated as a percentage of the value of AUM as of a specified date, or as a percentage of the value of average AUM for the applicable billing period, and vary with the type of investment service, the size of account and the total amount of assets we manage for a particular client. Accordingly, fee income generally increases or decreases as AUM increase or decrease and is therefore affected by market appreciation or depreciation, the addition of new client accounts or client contributions of additional assets to existing accounts, withdrawals of assets from and termination of client accounts, purchases and redemptions of mutual fund shares, shifts of assets between accounts or products with different fee structures, and acquisitions. Our average basis points realized (investment advisory fees divided by average AUM) generally approximate 50 to 70 basis points for equity services, 25 to 45 basis points for fixed income services and 5 to 15 basis points for other services. As such, a shift of client assets from active equity services toward fixed income services and/or other services results in a decline in revenues just as a shift of assets toward active equity services would increase revenues.

        We calculate AUM using established fair valuation methodologies, including market-based valuation methods and fair valuation methods. Market-based valuation methods include: last sale/settle prices from an exchange for actively traded listed equities, options and futures; evaluated bid prices from recognized pricing vendors for fixed income, asset-backed or mortgage-backed issues; mid prices from recognized pricing vendors and brokers for credit default swaps; and quoted bids or spreads from pricing vendors and brokers for other derivative products. Fair valuation methods include discounted cash flow models, evaluation of assets versus liabilities or any other methodology that is validated and approved by our Valuation Committee. Fair valuation methods are used only where AUM cannot be valued using market-based valuation methods, such as in the case of private equity or illiquid securities. Investments utilizing fair value methods typically make up an insignificant amount of our total AUM. Market volatility has not had a significant effect on our ability to acquire market data and, accordingly, our ability to use market-based valuation methods.

        The Valuation Committee, which is composed of senior officers and employees, is responsible for overseeing the pricing and valuation of all investments held in client and AllianceBernstein portfolios. The Valuation Committee has adopted a Statement of Pricing Policies describing principles and policies that apply to pricing and valuing investments held in these portfolios. We have also established a Pricing Group, which reports to the Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee has delegated to the Pricing Group responsibility for overseeing the pricing process for all investments.

        We sometimes charge our clients performance-based fees. In these situations, we charge a base advisory fee and are eligible to earn an additional performance-based fee or incentive allocation that is calculated as either a percentage of absolute investment results or a percentage of investment results in excess of a stated benchmark over a specified period of time. Some performance-based fees include a high-watermark provision, which generally provides that if a client account underperforms relative to its performance target (whether absolute or relative to a specified benchmark), it must gain back such underperformance before we can collect future performance-based fees. Therefore, if we fail to achieve our performance target for a particular period, we will not earn a performance-based fee for that period and, for accounts with a high-watermark provision, our ability to earn future performance-based fees will be impaired. We are eligible to earn performance-based fees on approximately 8% of the assets we manage for institutional clients and approximately 3% of the assets we manage for private clients (in total, approximately 4% of our company-wide AUM). A majority of our hedge fund AUM is subject to high-watermarks and a significant majority of this AUM is below the high-watermarks. Accordingly, it is very unlikely we will earn performance-based fees on these hedge funds in 2013 on the AUM below high-watermarks. If the percentage of our AUM subject to performance-based fees grows, seasonality and volatility of revenue and earnings are likely to become more significant.


Table of Contents

        Our investment advisory and services fees decreased $144.2 million, or 7.5%, in 2012, primarily due to a decrease in base fees of $194.3 million, or 10.2%, which primarily resulted from an 8.0% decrease in average AUM and a continued shift in product mix from Equities to Fixed Income and Other in our Institutional AUM, offset by a $50.1 million increase in performance-based fees. During 2012, we recorded a $39.6 million performance fee from PPIP ($18.0 million of which is payable to third party sub-advisors). Our investment advisory and services fees decreased $135.3 million, or 6.6%, in 2011, primarily due to a decrease of 4.8% in average AUM.

        Institutional investment advisory and services fees decreased $130.9 million, or 21.2%, in 2012, due to a $174.2 million, or 29.0%, decrease in base fees, partly offset by a $43.3 million increase in performance-based fees (as a result of PPIP). The decrease in base fees was primarily due to a decrease in average AUM of 13.3% as well as a continued shift in product mix from Equities to Fixed Income. Average AUM for Equity services decreased 52.6% while average AUM for Fixed Income and Other products increased 7.6% and 16.6%, respectively. Institutional investment advisory and services fees decreased $148.0 million, or 19.4%, in 2011, primarily due to a decrease in average AUM of 8.8% as well as a shift in product mix from Equities to Fixed Income products. Average AUM for Equity services decreased 32.9% while average AUM for Fixed Income and Other services increased 7.1% and 63.2%, respectively.

        Retail investment advisory and services fees increased $52.7 million, or 8.1%, in 2012, due to a 3.4% increase in average AUM. The increase in fees as compared to an increase in average AUM is primarily due to a shift in product mix towards long-term non-U.S. global fixed income mutual funds from long-term U.S. mutual funds and other Retail products and services, which generally have higher fees as compared to long-term U.S. mutual funds and other Retail products and services. Retail investment advisory and services fees increased $12.6 million, or 2.0%, in 2011, primarily due to a 1.0% increase in average AUM and the impact of significant net sales of long-term non-U.S. global fixed income mutual funds, which generally have higher fees as compared to long-term U.S. mutual funds.

        Private Client investment advisory and services fees decreased $66.0 million, or 10.2%, in 2012, primarily as a result of a decline in base fees of $69.9 million, or 10.8%, reflecting a decrease in average billable AUM of 8.5% and the impact of a shift in product mix from Equities to Other products. Private Client investment advisory and services fees increased by $0.1 million in 2011, primarily as a result of higher base fees of $1.3 million, reflecting an increase in average billable AUM of 1.4%, offset by $1.2 million in lower performance-based fees.

Bernstein Research Services

        Bernstein Research Services revenue consists principally of equity commissions received for providing equity research and brokerage-related services to institutional investors.

        Revenues from Bernstein Research Services decreased $23.7 million, or 5.4%, in 2012. The decrease in 2012 was the result of a significant decline in market trading volumes, partially offset by market share gains. Revenues from Bernstein Research Services increased $6.9 million, or 1.6%, in 2011. The increase in 2011 was the result of higher trading commissions in Europe and Asia, partially offset by lower trading commissions in the U.S. During the fourth quarter of 2011, however, trading activity declined sharply, which adversely affected our sell-side revenues.

Distribution Revenues

        AllianceBernstein Investments and AllianceBernstein (Luxembourg) act as distributor and/or placing agent of company-sponsored mutual funds and receive distribution services fees from certain of those funds as partial reimbursement of the distribution expenses they incur. Period-over-period fluctuations of distribution revenues are typically in-line with fluctuations of the corresponding average AUM of these mutual funds.


Table of Contents

        Distribution revenues increased $50.1 million, or 14.2%, and $13.0 million, or 3.8%, in 2012 and 2011, respectively, while the corresponding average AUM of these mutual funds grew 14.6% and 8.1%, respectively. Average AUM of non B-share and non C-share mutual funds (which have lower distribution fee rates than B-share and C-share mutual funds) increased 18.3% and 12.0%, respectively, while average AUM of B-share and C-share mutual funds increased by 0.6% in 2012 and decreased by 5.9% in 2011.

        During 2010, the SEC proposed a rule amendment that would significantly change and restrict the ability of U.S. mutual funds to pay distribution and servicing fees ("12b-1 fees") to financial services firms for distributing their shares. If rules are adopted as proposed, changes in existing 12b-1 fee arrangements for a number of share classes offered by company-sponsored mutual funds would be required, which would reduce the net fund distribution revenues we receive from company-sponsored mutual funds. The impact of this rule change, which we do not anticipate being material, is dependent upon the final rules adopted by the SEC, any phase-in or grandfathering period, and any other changes made with respect to share class distribution arrangements.

Dividend and Interest Income and Interest Expense

        Dividend and interest income consists primarily of investment income and interest earned on customer margin balances and U.S. Treasury Bills. Interest expense principally reflects interest accrued on cash balances in customers' brokerage accounts. Dividend and interest income, net of interest expense, decreased $0.9 million and $0.4 million, in 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Investment Gains (Losses)

        Investment gains (losses) consist of realized and unrealized investment gains or losses on: (i) employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments, (ii) investments owned by our consolidated venture capital fund, (iii) U.S. Treasury Bills, (iv) market-making in cash equities and exchange-traded options and equities, (v) seed capital investments and (vi) derivatives. Investment gains (losses) also include realized gains or losses on the sale of seed capital investments classified as available-for-sale securities and equity in earnings of proprietary investments in limited partnership hedge funds that we sponsor and manage.

        Investment gains (losses) are as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in millions)
 

Long-term incentive compensation-related investments

          

Realized gains (losses)

 $1.3 $(8.3)$(12.0)

Unrealized gains (losses)

  15.4  (12.0) 39.1 

Consolidated private equity fund investments

          

Realized gains (losses)

  (17.0) (0.8) 21.2 

Unrealized gains (losses)

  18.2  (39.0) (39.6)

Seed capital investments

          

Realized gains (losses)

  (21.1) 15.8  (6.5)

Unrealized gains (losses)

  39.2  (25.8) 8.9 

Brokerage-related investments

          

Realized gains (losses)

  (4.8) (12.4) (13.4)

Unrealized gains (losses)

  (2.0) 0.4  0.9 
        

 $29.2 $(82.1)$(1.4)
        

Table of Contents

        Realized gains or losses on long-term incentive compensation-related investments typically occur in December of each year, as well as during the first quarter, as award tranches vest and related investments are sold to provide cash for payments to employees. The unrealized gains during 2012 and 2010 reflect the favorable financial markets during those periods, while unrealized losses on employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments during 2011 reflect unfavorable financial markets.

        During 2012, the publicly traded securities held by our consolidated private equity fund incurred realized losses compared to realized gains during 2011, while the non-public investments incurred realized losses during both periods. The fund incurred unrealized mark-to-market gains relating to both its publicly traded and non-public investments during 2012 compared to unrealized mark-to-market losses during 2011. Our consolidated private equity fund during 2011 incurred slightly higher mark-to-market losses relating to privately held securities held by the fund, offset by slightly lower mark-to-market losses relating to publicly traded securities. Also, 2010 reflects gains on the sale of securities.

        Our seed capital investments had unrealized gains in 2012 and 2010 as compared to unrealized losses in 2011. Offsetting these gains and losses were realized losses in 2012 and 2010 as compared to realized gains in 2011, on our derivatives we use to hedge our seed capital investments.

Other Revenues

        Other revenues consist of fees earned for transfer agency services provided to company-sponsored mutual funds, fees earned for administration and recordkeeping services provided to company-sponsored mutual funds and the general accounts of AXA and its subsidiaries, and other miscellaneous revenues. Other revenues decreased 5.4% and 2.0% in 2012 and 2011, respectively, primarily due to lower shareholder servicing fees.

        The following table summarizes the components of expenses:

 
 Years Ended December 31, % Change 
 
 2012 2011 2010 2012 - 11 2011 - 10 
 
 (in millions)
  
  
 

Employee compensation and benefits:

                

Employee compensation and benefits          

 $1,168.6 $1,246.9 $1,320.5  (6.3)% (5.6)%

Long-term incentive compensation charge

    587.1    n/m  n/m 
              

  1,168.6  1,834.0  1,320.5  (36.3) 38.9 

Promotion and servicing:

                

Distribution-related payments

  367.1  302.7  286.7  21.3  5.6 

Amortization of deferred sales commissions

  40.3  37.7  47.4  6.9  (20.5)

Other

  202.2  219.2  193.8  (7.8) 13.1 
              

  609.6  559.6  527.9  8.9  6.0 

General and administrative:

                

General and administrative

  508.4  533.6  516.2  (4.7) 3.4 

Real estate charges

  223.0  7.2  101.7  n/m  (92.9)
              

  731.4  540.8  617.9  35.2  (12.5)

Interest

  3.4  2.6  2.1  34.7  22.5 

Amortization of intangible assets

  21.4  21.4  21.3    0.3 
              

Total

 $2,534.4 $2,958.4 $2,489.7  (14.3) 18.8 
              

Table of Contents

Employee Compensation and Benefits

        We had 3,318 full-time employees as of December 31, 2012 compared to 3,764 as of year-end 2011 and 4,256 as of year-end 2010. Employee compensation and benefits consist of salaries (including severance), annual short-term incentive compensation awards (cash bonuses), annual long-term incentive compensation awards, commissions, fringe benefits and other employment costs (including recruitment, training, temporary help and meals).

        As a result of the changes made to our long-term incentive compensation program in 2011 (discussed earlier in this Management's Discussion and Analysis), we recorded a one-time, non-cash charge of $587.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 for all unrecognized long-term incentive compensation on outstanding awards from prior years. In addition, we recorded 100% of the expense associated with our 2011 long-term incentive compensation awards of $159.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2011.

        Compensation expense as a percentage of net revenues was 42.7%, 45.3% (excluding the one-time, non-cash charge) and 44.8% for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Compensation expense generally is determined on a discretionary basis and is primarily a function of our firm's financial performance. Amounts are awarded to help us achieve our key compensation goals of attracting, motivating and retaining top talent, by providing awards for the past year's performance and providing incentives for future performance, while also helping ensure that our firm's Unitholders receive an appropriate return on their investment. Senior management, with the approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board ("Compensation Committee"), confirmed that the appropriate metric to consider in determining the amount of incentive compensation is the ratio of adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense to adjusted net revenues. Adjusted net revenues used in the adjusted compensation ratio are the same as the adjusted net revenues presented as a non-GAAP measure (discussed earlier), less revenues associated with acquisitions in 2010 and 2011 to implement strategic product initiatives (applicable to 2011 adjusted compensation ratio only). Adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense is total employee compensation and benefits expense minus other employment costs such as recruitment, training, temporary help and meals, and excludes the impact of mark-to-market vesting expense, as well as dividends and interest expenses, associated with employee long-term incentive compensation-related investments and total compensation and certain amortization of equity-based awards of personnel related to acquisitions in 2010 and 2011 to implement strategic product initiatives (applicable to 2011 adjusted compensation ratio only). Senior management, with the approval of the Compensation Committee, also established as an objective that adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense generally should not exceed 50% of our adjusted net revenues except in unexpected or unusual circumstances. Our ratios of adjusted compensation expense as a percentage of adjusted net revenues were 49.8%, 50.3% and 49.7%, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

        During June 2012, Peter S. Kraus, the General Partner, AllianceBernstein and Holding entered into an agreement (the "Extended Employment Agreement") pursuant to which Mr. Kraus will continue to serve as Chairman of the Board of the General Partner and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, AllianceBernstein and Holding from January 3, 2014, the date following the end of the term of his existing employment agreement, until January 2, 2019 (the "Extended Employment Term"), unless the Extended Employment Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms. In connection with the signing of the Extended Employment Agreement, Mr. Kraus was granted 2,722,052 restricted Holding Units, vesting ratably over the Extended Employment Term. Under U.S. GAAP, the compensation expense for the Holding Unit award under the Extended Employment Agreement of $33.1 million (based on the $12.17 grant date Holding Unit price) must be amortized on a straight-line basis over 6.5 years, beginning on the grant date. As a result, even though Mr. Kraus will not receive any incremental cash compensation or cash distributions related to the restricted Holding Unit award pursuant to the Extended Employment Agreement prior to its commencement date on January 3, 2014,


Table of Contents

we incurred $2.5 million incremental compensation expense resulting from such amortization during the second half of 2012 and will incur $5.1 million of such expense for the full year 2013.

        In 2012, employee compensation and benefits expense decreased $665.4 million, or 36.3%, primarily due to the one-time compensation charge ($587.1 million) in 2011, the net impact of lower adjusted net revenues and a lower adjusted compensation ratio ($87.7 million) and compensation during 2011 of personnel related to acquisitions ($14.8 million), partially offset by higher long-term incentive compensation mark-to-market expense ($34.3 million). In 2011, employee compensation and benefit expense increased $513.5 million, or 38.9%, primarily due to the 2011 one-time compensation charge ($587.1 million) and compensation during 2011 of personnel related to acquisitions ($14.8 million), partially offset by the net impact of lower adjusted net revenues and a higher adjusted compensation ratio ($60.3 million) and lower long-term incentive compensation mark-to-market expense ($22.2 million).

        Since 2009, all long-term incentive compensation awards to eligible employees, which typically vest ratably over four years, have been made in the form of restricted Holding Units or deferred cash (in 2010, deferred cash was an option available only to certain non-U.S. employees; this option was expanded to most employees in 2011 and 2012). Prior to 2009, employees receiving long-term incentive compensation awards allocated a portion of their awards to notional investments in company-sponsored investment products (primarily mutual funds). Increases in the value of the notional investments in company-sponsored investment products increase the company's compensation liability to employees, while decreases in the value of the investments decrease the company's liability. The company generally purchased an amount of these investments equivalent to the notional investments and held them in a consolidated rabbi trust to economically hedge its exposure to valuation changes on its future obligations. Mark-to-market gains or losses on these investments are recognized in investment gains and losses as they occur. However, prior to the changes made to the long-term incentive compensation program in 2011, the impact of cumulative mark-to-market gains or losses was recognized as increases or decreases in compensation expense ratably over the remaining vesting period. As a result, there was not a direct correlation between current period long-term incentive compensation-related investment gains or losses recognized in revenues and the amortization of cumulative mark-to-market investment gains or losses recognized in compensation expense. Although there can be significant volatility from period to period as the value of these investments change, if a participant remained employed by the company over the entire vesting period of the award, mark-to-market investment gains or losses recognized in revenues would, over that vesting period, equal mark-to-market investment gains or losses recognized in compensation expense. As a result of the 2011 changes, mark-to-market investment gains or losses recognized in compensation expense will closely approximate mark-to-market investment gains and losses recognized in net revenues.


Table of Contents

        The investment gains and losses on long-term incentive compensation-related investments recognized in net revenues as compared to the amortization of long-term incentive compensation awards notionally invested in company-sponsored investment products are as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in millions)
 

Investment gains (losses)

 $16.7 $(20.3)$27.1 

Amortization of awards notionally invested in company-sponsored investments products:

          

Original award

    105.0  119.7 

Prior periods' mark-to-market

    18.0  (12.0)

Current period mark-to-market

  14.9  (19.4) 14.8 
        

Total

  14.9  103.6  122.5 
        

Net operating income impact

 $1.8 $(123.9)$(95.4)
        

Promotion and Servicing

        Promotion and servicing expenses include distribution-related payments to financial intermediaries for distribution of AllianceBernstein mutual funds and amortization of deferred sales commissions paid to financial intermediaries for the sale of back-end load shares of AllianceBernstein mutual funds. Also included in this expense category are costs related to travel and entertainment, advertising and promotional materials.

        Promotion and servicing expenses increased $50.0 million, or 8.9%, in 2012. The increase reflects higher distribution-related payments of $64.4 million, or 21.3%, higher amortization of deferred sales commissions of $2.6 million and higher marketing and advertising costs of $2.7 million, partially offset by lower travel and entertainment of $11.4 million, lower trade execution of $5.0 million and lower transfer fees of $4.5 million all due to the prior year's increased business activity and new product launches. Promotion and servicing expenses increased $31.7 million, or 6.0%, in 2011. The increase reflects higher distribution-related payments of $16.0 million, or 5.6%, higher travel and entertainment of $8.1 million, higher trade and execution and clearing costs of $8.1 million and higher transfer fees of $6.3 million, all attributable to increased business activity and new product launches. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in amortization of deferred sales commissions of $9.7 million. The increases in distribution-related payments in both 2012 and 2011 were generally in line with the 14.2% and 3.8% increases in distribution revenues, respectively, as well as higher broker-related distribution costs each year as compared to prior year costs.

General and Administrative

        General and administrative expenses include technology, professional fees, occupancy, communications and similar expenses. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of net revenues were 26.7% (18.6% excluding real estate charges), 19.7% (19.4% excluding real estate charges) and 21.0% (17.5% excluding real estate charges) for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. General and administrative expenses increased $190.6 million, or 35.2%, in 2012, primarily due to higher real estate charges of $215.8 million, higher portfolio services expenses of $18.6 million (primarily due to PPIP sub-advisor payments) and higher legal expenses of $15.6 million (primarily due to our receipt of insurance proceeds of $10.7 million in 2011), partially offset by lower office and related expenses of $32.8 million (excluding real estate charges), lower technology expenses of $13.7 million and a cash receipt of $6.5 million in 2012 relating to the finalization of a claims processing contingency originally recorded in 2006. General and administrative expenses decreased


Table of Contents

$77.1 million, or 12.5%, in 2011, primarily due to lower real estate charges of $94.5 million, partially offset by higher portfolio services expenses of $9.8 million (including market data services and sub-advisory fees).

        AllianceBernstein, a private limited partnership, is not subject to federal or state corporate income taxes, but we are subject to the New York City unincorporated business tax ("UBT"). Our domestic corporate subsidiaries are subject to federal, state and local income taxes, and are generally included in the filing of a consolidated federal income tax return. Separate state and local income tax returns are also filed. Foreign corporate subsidiaries are generally subject to taxes in the jurisdictions where they are located.

        Income tax expense increased $10.6 million, or 344.3%, in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase was primarily due to higher operating income in 2012 (in large part due to the 2011 compensation charge offset by the 2012 real estate charges), partially offset by the UBT tax benefit recorded in the third quarter of 2012 ($5.7 million). In the third quarter of 2012, application of the New York City tax law that sources various types of receipts from services performed by registered brokers and dealers of securities and commodities for purposes of apportioning income resulted in a reduction of our rate of tax for 2012 and to the rate of tax that we expect to pay in the future. As a result, we recognized a $5.7 million tax benefit in the third quarter of 2012 relating to our full year 2011 and nine months 2012 UBT.

        Income tax expense decreased $35.4 million, or 92.0%, in 2011 compared to 2010. Prior to the fourth quarter 2011 compensation charge of $587.1 million, our estimate of our full-year 2011 effective tax rate was 7.1%. As a result of the compensation charge, as well as the immediate recognition of the 2011 long-term incentive compensation awards, we had a fourth quarter 2011 effective tax rate of 3.8% (pre-tax loss of $540.2 million and income tax benefit of $20.3 million, that resulted in a full-year 2011 pre-tax loss of $208.5 million and income tax expense of $3.1 million). The compensation charge resulted in a one-time change to the historical mix of business between AllianceBernstein, which incurs a 4.0% UBT, and its corporate subsidiaries that incur corporate level income taxes. In addition, the recorded tax benefit associated with the future deliveries of vested Holding Units was based on the current market value in most jurisdictions, which was lower than the grant price of the awards included in the compensation charge. Both contributed to us incurring tax expense of $3.1 million rather than a benefit at the full-year estimated effective tax rate of 7.1%.

        Net income (loss) of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests consists of limited partner interests owned by other investors representing 90% of the total limited partner interests in our consolidated venture capital fund. It also included the 50% interest owned by AXA and its subsidiaries in our consolidated joint venture in Australia through March 31, 2011, when we purchased the remaining 50% interest in the Australian joint venture for $21.4 million. In 2012, we had a $0.3 million net loss of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests, due primarily to a $1.2 million net investment gain attributable to our consolidated venture capital fund (of which 90% belongs to non-controlling interests) and management fees of $1.5 million. In 2011, we had a $36.8 million net loss of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests, due primarily to a $39.8 million net investment loss attributable to our consolidated venture capital fund.

        During 2012, net cash provided by operating activities was $684.0 million, compared to $578.2 million during 2011. The change was primarily due to lower net purchases of investments of


Table of Contents

$247.5 million, primarily related to broker-dealer investments and seed capital investments, and lower broker-dealer related net receivables and segregated U.S. Treasury Bills of $80.4 million, partially offset by lower cash provided by net income of $103.6 million and increases in fees receivable and deferred sales commissions. During 2011, net cash provided by operating activities was $578.2 million, compared with $830.1 million during 2010. The change was primarily due to an increase in seed investments and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

        During 2012, net cash used in investing activities was $18.3 million, compared to $76.7 million during 2011. The change was primarily due to the three acquisitions we made during 2011. In addition, our net additions to furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements decreased $19.3 million in 2012 as compared to 2011. During 2011, net cash used in investing activities was $76.7 million, compared to $33.5 million during 2010. During 2011, we made three acquisitions for $41.8 million compared to our 2010 acquisition for $14.3 million. In addition, our net additions to furniture, equipment and leasehold improvement also increased $14.8 million in 2011 as compared to 2010.

        During 2012, net cash used in financing activities was $682.2 million, compared to $512.2 million during 2011. The increase reflects commercial paper net payments of $123.3 million in 2012 compared to $219.4 million of net issuances during 2011, offset by lower distributions to the General Partner and Unitholders of $155.0 million as a result of lower earnings (distributions on earnings are paid one quarter in arrears) and changes in overdrafts payable of $38.4 million. During 2011, net cash used in financing activities was $512.2 million, compared to $760.6 million during 2010. The decrease reflects net issuance of commercial paper of $219.4 million in 2011 compared to net repayment of commercial paper of $24.2 million in 2010 and lower distributions to the General Partner and Unitholders of $18.6 million as a result of lower earnings (distributions on earnings are paid one quarter in arrears), offset by changes in overdrafts payable of $53.9 million.

        As of December 31, 2012, AllianceBernstein had $627.2 million of cash and cash equivalents, all of which is available for liquidity, but is comprised primarily of cash on deposit for our broker-dealers to comply with various customer clearing activities and cash held by foreign entities for which a permanent investment assertion for U.S. tax purposes is taken. If the cash held at our foreign subsidiaries of $305.4 million, which includes cash on deposit for our foreign broker-dealers, was to be repatriated to the U.S., we would be required to accrue and pay U.S. income taxes on these funds, based on the unremitted amount. Our intent is to permanently reinvest these earnings outside the U.S. We currently do not anticipate a liquidity need requiring a repatriation of these funds to the U.S.

Debt and Credit Facilities

        As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, AllianceBernstein had $323.2 million and $444.9 million, respectively, in commercial paper outstanding with weighted average interest rates of approximately 0.5% and 0.2%, respectively. The commercial paper is short term in nature, and as such, recorded value is estimated to approximate fair value. Average daily borrowings of commercial paper during 2012 and 2011 were $404.9 million and $273.6 million, respectively, with weighted average interest rates of approximately 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively.

        AllianceBernstein has a $1.0 billon committed, unsecured senior revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility") with a group of commercial banks and other lenders, which matures on January 17, 2017. The Credit Facility provides for possible increases in the principal amount by up to an aggregate incremental amount of $250 million, any such increase being subject to the consent of the affected lenders. The Credit Facility is available for AllianceBernstein's and SCB LLC's business purposes, including the support of AllianceBernstein's $1.0 billion commercial paper program. Both AllianceBernstein and SCB LLC can draw directly under the Credit Facility and management expects to draw on the Credit Facility from time to time. AllianceBernstein has agreed to guarantee the obligations of SCB LLC under the Credit Facility.


Table of Contents

        The Credit Facility contains affirmative, negative and financial covenants, which are customary for facilities of this type, including, among other things, restrictions on dispositions of assets, restrictions on liens, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. We are in compliance with these covenants. The Credit Facility also includes customary events of default (with customary grace periods, as applicable), including provisions under which, upon the occurrence of an event of default, all outstanding loans may be accelerated and/or lender's commitments may be terminated. Also, under such provisions, upon the occurrence of certain insolvency- or bankruptcy-related events of default, all amounts payable under the Credit Facility would automatically become immediately due and payable, and the lender's commitments would automatically terminate.

        Amounts under the Credit Facility may be borrowed, repaid and re-borrowed by us from time to time until the maturity of the facility. Voluntary prepayments and commitment reductions requested by us are permitted at any time without fee (other than customary breakage costs relating to the prepayment of any drawn loans) upon proper notice and subject to a minimum dollar requirement. Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum, which will be, at our option, a rate equal to an applicable margin, which is subject to adjustment based on the credit ratings of AllianceBernstein, plus one of the following indexes: London Interbank Offered Rate; a floating base rate; or the Federal Funds rate.

        As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had no amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility. During 2012, we did not draw upon the Credit Facility. During 2011, $40.0 million was outstanding for one day in February (with an interest rate of 1.3%) resulting in average daily borrowings of $0.1 million under the Credit Facility.

        In addition, SCB LLC has five uncommitted lines of credit with four financial institutions. Two of these lines of credit permit us to borrow up to an aggregate of approximately $200.0 million while three lines have no stated limit.

        As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had no uncommitted bank loans outstanding. Average daily borrowings of uncommitted bank loans during 2012 and 2011 were $18.1 million and $6.4 million, respectively, with weighted average interest rates of approximately 1.3% for both years. In May 2012, AllianceBernstein was named an additional borrower under a $100.0 million SCB uncommitted line of credit. As of December 31, 2012, AllianceBernstein had no loans outstanding. During 2012, $5.0 million was outstanding for one day with an interest rate of 1.4%. In January 2013, AllianceBernstein was named an additional borrower on a second $100.0 million SCB uncommitted line of credit.

        Our financial condition and access to public and private debt markets should provide adequate liquidity for our general business needs. Management believes that cash flow from operations and the issuance of debt and AllianceBernstein Units or Holding Units will provide us with the resources necessary to meet our financial obligations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations

        We have no off-balance sheet arrangements other than the guarantees and contractual obligations that are discussed below.

Guarantees

        Under various circumstances, AllianceBernstein guarantees the obligations of its consolidated subsidiaries.

        AllianceBernstein maintains a guarantee in connection with the $1.0 billion Credit Facility. If SCB LLC is unable to meet its obligations, AllianceBernstein will pay the obligations when due or on demand. In addition, AllianceBernstein maintains guarantees totaling $400 million for three of SCB LLC's uncommitted lines of credit.


Table of Contents

        AllianceBernstein maintains a guarantee with a commercial bank, under which we guarantee the obligations in the ordinary course of business of SCBL. We also maintain three additional guarantees with other commercial banks, under which we guarantee approximately $430 million of obligations for SCBL. In the event SCBL is unable to meet its obligations, AllianceBernstein will pay the obligations when due or on demand.

        We also have three smaller guarantees with a commercial bank totaling approximately $3 million, under which we guarantee certain obligations in the ordinary course of business of two foreign subsidiaries.

        We have not been required to perform under any of the above agreements and currently have no liability in connection with these agreements.

Aggregate Contractual Obligations

        The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012:

 
 Payments Due by Period 
 
 Total Less than
1 Year
 1 - 3 Years 3 - 5 Years More than
5 Years
 
 
 (in millions)
 

Commercial paper

 $323.2 $323.2 $ $ $ 

Operating leases, net of sublease commitments

  1,511.1  117.1  223.4  223.3  947.3 

Funding commitments

  28.7  5.4  23.3     

Accrued compensation and benefits

  449.0  207.4  181.5  31.2  28.9 

Unrecognized tax benefits

  3.7  0.8  1.9  1.0   
            

Total

 $2,315.7 $653.9 $430.1 $255.5 $976.2 
            

        During 2009, we entered into a subscription agreement under which we committed to invest up to $35 million, as amended in 2011, in a venture capital fund over a six-year period. As of December 31, 2012, we have funded $22.8 million of this commitment.

        During 2010, as general partner of the AllianceBernstein U.S. Real Estate L.P. Fund, we committed to invest $25 million in the Real Estate Fund. As of December 31, 2012, we had funded $8.7 million of this commitment.

        During 2012, we entered into an investment agreement under which we committed to invest up to $8 million in an oil and gas fund over a three-year period. As of December 31, 2012, we had funded $7.8 million of this commitment.

        Accrued compensation and benefits amounts in the table above exclude our accrued pension obligation. Offsetting our accrued compensation obligations are long-term incentive compensation-related investments and money market investments we funded totaling $132.9 million, which are included in our consolidated statement of financial condition. Any amounts reflected on the consolidated statement of financial condition as payables (to broker-dealers, brokerage clients and company-sponsored mutual funds) and accounts payable and accrued expenses are excluded from the table above.

        We expect to make contributions to our qualified profit sharing plan of approximately $14 million in each of the next four years. We currently estimate that we will contribute $4.0 million to the Retirement Plan during 2013.


Table of Contents

        SeeNote 13 to our audited consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus for a discussion of our commitments and contingencies.

        The preparation of the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.

        Management believes that the critical accounting policies and estimates discussed below involve significant management judgment due to the sensitivity of the methods and assumptions used.

Variable Interest Entities

        In accordance with ASU 2009-17,Consolidations (Topic 810)—Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities, the determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity's purpose and design, a company's ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, and whether a company is obligated to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the entity. The standard also requires ongoing assessments of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity ("VIE").

        Significant judgment is required in the determination of whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE. If we, together with our related party relationships, are determined to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE, the entity will be consolidated within our consolidated financial statements. In order to determine whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, management must make significant estimates and assumptions of probable future cash flows and assign probabilities to different cash flow scenarios. Assumptions made in such analyses include, but are not limited to, market prices of securities, market interest rates, potential credit defaults on individual securities or default rates on a portfolio of securities, gain realization, liquidity or marketability of certain securities, discount rates and the probability of certain other outcomes.

Goodwill

        As of December 31, 2012, goodwill of $3.0 billion on the consolidated statement of financial condition included $2.8 billion as a result of the Bernstein Transaction and $154 million in regard to various smaller acquisitions. We have determined that AllianceBernstein has only one reporting segment and reporting unit.

        We test our goodwill annually, as of September 30, for impairment. As of September 30, 2012, the impairment test indicated that goodwill was not impaired. The carrying value of goodwill is also reviewed if facts and circumstances occur that suggest possible impairment, such as significant declines in AUM, revenues, earnings or the price of a Holding Unit.

        The impairment test is a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test is used to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of AllianceBernstein, the reporting unit, with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not performed. However, if the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit to the aggregated fair values of its individual assets and liabilities to determine the amount of impairment, if any.


Table of Contents

        As of September 30, 2012, AllianceBernstein estimated its fair value under both the market approach and income approach. The types of assumptions and methodologies used under both approaches were consistent with those used in impairment tests performed in prior periods. Under the market approach, the fair value of the reporting unit was based on its unadjusted market valuation (AllianceBernstein Units outstanding multiplied by the price of a Holding Unit) and adjusted market valuations assuming a control premium and earnings multiples. The price of a publicly traded AllianceBernstein Holding Unit serves as a reasonable starting point for valuing an AllianceBernstein Unit because each represents the same fractional interest in our underlying business. On an unadjusted basis, AllianceBernstein's fair value per unit as of September 30, 2012 was $15.41 (the price of a Holding Unit as of that date) as compared to its carrying value, or book value, of $14.09 per unit. Also under the market approach, we typically assume a control premium of 10% - 20% for the reporting unit, which was determined based on an analysis of control premiums for relevant recent acquisitions, as well as comparable industry earnings multiples applied to our current earnings forecast. A control premium was not needed in the analysis for fair value to exceed carrying value. Under the income approach, the fair value of the reporting unit was based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Determining estimated fair value using a discounted cash flow valuation technique consists of applying business growth rate assumptions over the estimated life of the goodwill asset and then discounting the resulting expected cash flows using an estimated weighted average cost of capital of market participants to arrive at a present value amount that approximates fair value. In our tests, our discounted expected cash flow model uses management's current five-year business plan, which factored in current market conditions and all material events that had impacted, or that we believed at the time could potentially impact, future expected cash flows and a declining annual growth rate thereafter for three years before using a terminal value growth rate. We ran multiple discounted cash flow analyses under several scenarios. We used a weighted average cost of equity ranging from 7% to 10% as the discount rate. We used a cost of equity rate, as opposed to a cost of capital, due to using net income in our expected cash flow model (as a result of generally distributing 100% of our earnings). The cost of debt is already factored into the net income projections. We used terminal value growth rates ranging from 2% to 4% and we used our business plan growth rates as a base case and at stressed levels approximately 50% lower, as a result of current economic uncertainty and market dynamics.

        Management considered the results of the market approach and income approach analysis performed along with a number of other factors (including current market conditions) and has determined that AllianceBernstein's fair value exceeded its carrying value as of September 30, 2012 by approximately 9% using the market approach (excluding any control premium), and by more than 50% using the income approach (using the most stressed scenarios). As such, no goodwill impairment existed and the second step of the goodwill impairment test was not required.

        As a result of increased economic uncertainty and current market dynamics, determining whether an impairment of the goodwill asset exists requires management to exercise significant judgment. In addition, to the extent that securities valuations are depressed for prolonged periods of time and market conditions worsen, or if we experience significant net redemptions, our AUM, revenues, profitability and unit price may be adversely affected. Although the price of a Holding Unit is just one factor in the calculation of fair value, if current Holding Unit price levels decline significantly, reaching the conclusion that fair value exceeds carrying value will, over time, become more difficult. In addition, control premiums, industry earnings multiples and discount rates are impacted by economic conditions. As a result, subsequent impairment tests may occur more frequently and be based on more negative assumptions and future cash flow projections, and may result in an impairment of goodwill. Any impairment could reduce materially the recorded amount of this asset, with a corresponding charge to our earnings.


Table of Contents

Real Estate Charges

        During 2010 and 2012, we performed comprehensive reviews of our office real estate requirements and determined to consolidate office space and sub-lease the excess office space. As a result, we recorded real estate charges that reflect the net present value of the difference between the amount of our on-going contractual lease obligations for the vacated floors and our estimate of current market rental rates for such floors. The charges we recorded were based on current assumptions at the time of the charges regarding sublease marketing periods, costs to prepare the properties to market, market rental rates, broker commissions and subtenant allowances/incentives, all of which are factors largely beyond our control. If our assumptions prove to be incorrect, we may need to record additional charges or reduce previously recorded charges.

Retirement Plan

        We maintain a qualified, noncontributory, defined benefit retirement plan covering current and former employees who were employed by the company in the United States prior to October 2, 2000. Service and compensation after December 31, 2008 are not taken into account in determining participants' retirement benefits. The amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements related to the retirement plan are determined from actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are assumptions, including expected return on plan assets, discount rates at which liabilities could be settled, rates of annual salary increases and mortality rates. The assumptions are reviewed annually and may be updated to reflect the current environment. Key assumptions aredescribed in Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus. In accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, actual results that differ from those assumed are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, affect expense recognized and liabilities recorded in future periods.

        In developing the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8.0%, we considered the historical returns and future expectations for returns for each asset category, as well as the target asset allocation of the portfolio. The expected long-term rate of return on assets is based on weighted average expected returns for each asset class. We assumed a target allocation weighting of 50% to 70% for equity securities, 20% to 40% for debt securities, and 0% to 10% for real estate investment trusts. Exposure of the total portfolio to cash equivalents on average should not exceed 5% of the portfolio's value on a market value basis. The plan seeks to provide a rate of return that exceeds applicable benchmarks over rolling five-year periods. The benchmark for the plan's large cap domestic equity investment strategy is the S&P 500 Index; the small cap domestic equity investment strategy is measured against the Russell 2000 Index; the international equity investment strategy is measured against the MSCI EAFE Index; and the fixed income investment strategy is measured against the Barclays Aggregate Bond Index. The actual rates of return on plan assets were 12.5%, (9.3)% and 9.8% in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. A 25 basis point adjustment, up or down, in the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets would have decreased or increased the 2012 net pension expense of $0.4 million by approximately $0.2 million.

        The objective of our discount rate assumption was to reflect the rate at which our pension obligations could be effectively settled. In making this determination, we considered the timing and amount of benefits that would be payable under the plan's lump sum option. Our methodology for selecting the discount rate as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 was to construct a hypothetical bond portfolio whose cash flow from coupons and maturities match the year-by-year, projected benefit cash flow from the plan. The selection of the 4.4% and 5.1% discount rate as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, represents the Mercer Human Resources Bond Model (to the nearest five basis points). The discount rate as of December 31, 2011 was used in developing the 2012 net pension charge. A lower discount rate increases pension expense and the present value of benefit obligations. A 25 basis point adjustment, up or down, in the discount rate (along with a corresponding adjustment in


Table of Contents

the assumed lump sum interest rate) would have decreased or increased the 2012 net pension expense of $0.4 million by approximately $0.1 million.

Loss Contingencies

        Management continuously reviews with legal counsel the status of regulatory matters and pending or threatened litigation. We evaluate the likelihood that a loss contingency exists and record a loss contingency if it is probable and reasonably estimable as of the date of the financial statements. SeeNote 13 to our consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus.

        See Note 24 to our audited consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus.

        This Management's Discussion and Analysis contains certain forward-looking statements. See "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements."

        Our investments consist of trading and available-for-sale investments, and other investments. Trading and available-for-sale investments include United States Treasury Bills, mutual funds, exchange-traded options and various separately managed portfolios consisting of equity and fixed income securities. Trading investments are purchased for short-term investment, principally to fund liabilities related to long-term incentive compensation plans and to seed new investment services. Although available-for-sale investments are purchased for long-term investment, the portfolio strategy considers them available-for-sale from time to time due to changes in market interest rates, equity prices and other relevant factors. Other investments include investments in hedge funds sponsored by AllianceBernstein, our consolidated venture capital fund and other private equity investment vehicles.

        We enter into various futures, forwards and swaps to economically hedge our seed capital investments. In addition, we have currency forwards that economically hedge certain cash accounts. We do not hold any derivatives designated in a formal hedge relationship under ASC 815-10,Derivatives and Hedging. SeeNote 8 to our consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus.

Investments with Interest Rate Risk—Fair Value

        The table below provides our potential exposure with respect to our fixed income investments, measured in terms of fair value, to an immediate 100 basis point increase in interest rates at all maturities from the levels prevailing as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. Such a fluctuation in interest rates is a hypothetical rate scenario used to calibrate potential risk and does not represent our view of future market changes. While these fair value measurements provide a representation of interest rate sensitivity of our investments in fixed income mutual funds and fixed income hedge funds, they are based on our exposures at a particular point in time and may not be representative of future market


Table of Contents

results. These exposures will change as a result of ongoing changes in investments in response to our assessment of changing market conditions and available investment opportunities:

 
 As of December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 
 
 Fair Value Effect of
+100
Basis Point
Change
 Fair Value Effect of
+100
Basis Point
Change
 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Fixed Income Investments:

             

Trading

 $206,998 $(10,412)$171,691 $(8,464)

Available-for-sale and other investments

  6,296  (317) 6,983  (344)

Investments with Equity Price Risk—Fair Value

        Our investments also include investments in equity securities, mutual funds and hedge funds. The following table provides our potential exposure with respect to our equity investments, measured in terms of fair value, to an immediate 10% drop in equity prices from those prevailing as of December 31, 2012 and 2011. A 10% decrease in equity prices is a hypothetical scenario used to calibrate potential risk and does not represent our view of future market changes. While these fair value measurements provide a representation of equity price sensitivity of our investments in equity securities, mutual funds and hedge funds, they are based on our exposures at a particular point in time and may not be representative of future market results. These exposures will change as a result of ongoing portfolio activities in response to our assessment of changing market conditions and available investment opportunities:

 
 As of December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 
 
 Fair Value Effect of -10%
Equity Price
Change
 Fair Value Effect of -10%
Equity Price
Change
 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Equity Investments:

             

Trading

 $268,541 $(26,854)$339,308 $(33,931)

Available-for-sale and other investments

  250,666  (25,067) 277,312  (27,731)

        There have been no material changes to AllianceBernstein's market risk since December 31, 2012.


Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

        To contact our company's Corporate Secretary, you may send an email tocorporate_secretary@alliancebernstein.com or write to Corporate Secretary, AllianceBernstein L.P., 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10105.


General Partner

        The activities of AllianceBernstein and Holding (the "Partnerships") are managed and controlled by the General Partner. The Board of the General Partner ("Board") acts as the Board of each of the Partnerships. The General Partner has agreed that it will conduct no active business other than managing the Partnerships, although it may make certain investments for its own account. Neither AllianceBernstein Unitholders nor Holding unitholders have any rights to manage or control the Partnerships or to elect directors of the General Partner. The General Partner is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of AXA.


Table of Contents

        The General Partner does not receive any compensation from the Partnerships for services rendered to them as their general partner. The General Partner holds a 1% general partnership interest in AllianceBernstein and 100,000 units of general partnership interest in Holding. Each general partnership unit in Holding is entitled to receive distributions equal to those received by each Holding Unit.

        The General Partner is entitled to reimbursement by AllianceBernstein for any expenses it incurs in carrying out its activities as general partner of the Partnerships, including compensation paid by the General Partner to its directors and officers (to the extent such persons are not compensated directly by AllianceBernstein).


Board of Directors

        As of February 12, 2013, our Board consisted of 13 members, including our Chief Executive Officer, five senior executives of AXA and certain of its other subsidiaries, one former senior executive of AXA Financial, and six independent members. While we do not have a formal, written diversity policy in place, we believe that an effective board consists of a diverse group of individuals who collectively possess a variety of complementary skills and perspectives and who will work together to provide a board with the needed leadership and experience to successfully guide our company. As set forth in its charter, the Corporate Governance Committee of the Board ("Governance Committee") assists the Board in identifying and evaluating such candidates, determining Board composition, developing and monitoring a process to assess Board effectiveness, developing and implementing corporate governance guidelines, and reviewing programs relating to matters of corporate responsibility.

        As we indicate below, our directors have a combined wealth of leadership experience derived from extensive service leading large, complex organizations in their roles as either senior executives or board members and in government and academia. Each has the integrity, business judgment, collegiality and commitment that are among the essential characteristics for a member of our Board. Collectively, they have substantive knowledge and skills applicable to our business, including expertise in regulatory; public accounting and financial reporting; finance; risk management; business development; operations; strategic planning; management development, succession planning and compensation; corporate governance; investor relations; public policy; international matters; and financial services areas.

        As of February 12, 2013, the members of the Board were as follows:

Peter S. Kraus

        Mr. Kraus, age 60, was elected Chairman of the Board of the General Partner and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, AllianceBernstein and Holding in December 2008. Mr. Kraus has in-depth experience in financial services, including investment banking, asset management and private wealth management. He served as an executive vice president, the head of global strategy and a member of the Management Committee of Merrill Lynch & Company Inc. ("Merrill Lynch") from September 2008 through December 2008. Mr. Kraus spent 22 years with Goldman Sachs Group Inc. ("Goldman"), where he most recently served as co-head of the Investment Management Division and a member of the Management Committee, as well as head of firm-wide strategy and chairman of the Strategy Committee. Mr. Kraus also served as co-head of the Financial Institutions Group. He was named a partner at Goldman in 1994 and managing director in 1996. In April 2010, Mr. Kraus was appointed a member of the Management Committee of AXA, which was formed by Mr. de Castries in April 2010 to assist him with the operational management of AXA. He was named a Director of AXA Financial, AXA Equitable, MONY Life Insurance Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of AXA Financial, "MONY") and MONY Life Insurance Company of America (a wholly owned subsidiary of MONY, "MLOA") in February 2009. He is not compensated for serving in these roles for AXA and its subsidiaries. Mr. Kraus is also Chairman of the Investment Committee of Trinity College, Chair of the


Table of Contents

Board of Overseers of CalArts, Co-Chair of the Friends of Carnegie International, a member of the board of directors of Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts and the chairman of Lincoln Center's Art Committee, a member of the board of Keewaydin Foundation, and a member of the National Board of Young Audiences, Inc., a non-profit organization that works with educational systems, the arts community and private and public sectors to provide arts education to children.

        Mr. Kraus brings to the Board extensive knowledge of our industry and in-depth experience in financial services, including experience as co-head of the Investment Management Division and head of firm-wide strategy at Goldman.

Christopher M. Condron

        Mr. Condron, age 65, was elected a Director of the General Partner in May 2001. Formerly Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of AXA Financial since May 2001, he retired from his AXA positions effective January 1, 2011. Prior to retiring, he was also Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of AXA Equitable and a member of the Management Committee of AXA. In addition, Mr. Condron was Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of MONY and MLOA, which AXA Financial acquired in July 2004. During 2010, he assumed the additional responsibility of overseeing AXA's Global Life & Savings and Health businesses. Prior to joining AXA Financial, Mr. Condron served as both President and Chief Operating Officer of Mellon Financial Corporation ("Mellon"), from 1999, and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Dreyfus Corporation, a subsidiary of Mellon, from 1995. Mr. Condron has been a member of the Board of Directors of Keefe Bruyette & Woods, Inc. (NYSE: KBW), a full-service investment bank and broker-dealer, since January 2007. He also serves as Chairman of Keefe Bruyette & Woods's compensation committee and as a member of its audit committee and its corporate governance and nominating committee.

        Mr. Condron brings to the Board extensive financial services, insurance, sales and sell-side experience obtained from his service to AXA and Mellon, as well as his directorship at Keefe Bruyette & Woods.

Henri de Castries

        Mr. de Castries, age 58, was elected a Director of the General Partner in October 1993. In April 2010, in connection with a change in AXA's governance structure from dual boards (the Supervisory Board and the Management Board) to a single Board of Directors, Mr. de Castries was appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AXA. From May 2000 through the change in AXA's governance, Mr. de Castries was Chairman of the AXA Management Board. Prior thereto, he served AXA in various capacities, including Vice Chairman of the AXA Management Board; Senior Executive Vice President-Financial Services and Life Insurance Activities in the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom and Benelux from 1996 to 2000; Senior Executive Vice President-Financial Services and Life Insurance Activities from 1993 to 1996; Corporate Secretary from 1991 to 1993; and Central Director of Finances from 1989 to 1991. Before joining AXA, Mr. de Castries was part of the French Finance Ministry Inspection Office. He is a director or officer of AXA Financial, AXA Equitable and various other privately held subsidiaries and affiliates of the AXA Group. Mr. de Castries was elected Vice Chairman of AXA Financial in February 1996 and was elected Chairman of AXA Financial in April 1998. In addition, Mr. de Castries joined the board of directors and audit committee of Nestle, Inc. (VTX: NESN) in April 2012.

        Mr. de Castries brings to the Board his extensive experience as an AXA executive and, prior thereto, his financial and public sector experience gained from working in French government. The Board also benefits from his invaluable perspective as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AXA.


Table of Contents

Denis Duverne

        Mr. Duverne, age 59, was elected a Director of the General Partner in February 1996. In April 2010, he was appointed the Deputy Chief Executive Officer of AXA and a member of the Board of Directors of AXA. In January 2010, he was selected to oversee AXA Group strategy, finance and operations with AXA's Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Risk Officer reporting to him. Mr. Duverne was a member of the AXA Management Board from February 2003 through the change in AXA's governance in April 2010. He was Chief Financial Officer of AXA from May 2003 through December 2009. From January 2000 to May 2003, Mr. Duverne served as Group Executive Vice President-Finance, Control and Strategy. Mr. Duverne joined AXA as Senior Vice President in 1995. He is a Director of AXA Financial, AXA Equitable and various other privately held subsidiaries and affiliates of the AXA Group.

        Mr. Duverne brings to the Board the highly diverse experience he has attained throughout the years from the many key roles he has served for AXA.

Steven G. Elliott

        Mr. Elliott, age 66, was elected a Director of the General Partner in January 2011. Until his retirement in December 2010, Mr. Elliott had served as Senior Vice Chairman of The Bank of New York Mellon ("BNY Mellon") since 1998. In this role, he helped oversee numerous company-wide growth initiatives and co-headed the integration of The Bank of New York and Mellon from 2007 to 2009. Mr. Elliott was Chief Financial Officer of Mellon from 1990 to 2002 and Head of Finance from 1987 to 1990, while also leading some of Mellon's diverse lines of business, including asset servicing, securities lending, global cash management and institutional banking. Before joining BNY Mellon, he held senior positions at First Commerce Corporation (1986-87), Crocker National Bank (1984-86), Continental Illinois National Bank (1977-84) and United California Bank (1974-77). Since January 2011, he has been a member of the boards of directors of Huntington Bancshares Inc. (NASDAQ: HBAN) and PPL Corporation (NYSE: PPL). Since April 2011, he has served as Chairman of Huntington Bancshares's risk oversight committee and, since January 2012, he has served as Chairman of PPL Corporation's audit committee. Mr. Elliott served as a director of Mellon (NYSE: MEL) from 2001 to the July 2007 merger with The Bank of New York and then as a director of BNY Mellon (NYSE: BK) through July 2008.

        Mr. Elliott, an audit committee financial expert, brings to the Board the four decades of auditing and banking expertise he has gained in the financial services industry.

Deborah S. Hechinger

        Ms. Hechinger, age 62, was elected a Director of the General Partner in May 2007. Currently an independent consultant on non-profit governance, she was President and Chief Executive Officer of BoardSource, a leading governance resource for non-profit organizations, from 2003 to 2007. From 2004 to 2007, Ms. Hechinger also served as co-convener of the Governance and Fiduciary Responsibilities work group, one of the five groups established by the Panel on the Nonprofit Sector to make recommendations to Congress on ways to improve the governance and accountability of non-profit organizations. She also served on the Advisory Board for the Center for Effective Philanthropy and was a Member of the Ethics and Accountability Committee at Independent Sector. Prior to joining BoardSource, Ms. Hechinger was the Executive Vice President of the World Wildlife Fund, a large, global conservation organization, where she oversaw all fundraising, communication and operations activities. She has also served as a Deputy Comptroller and as Director of the Securities and Corporate Practices Division at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and has held senior executive positions in the Division of Enforcement at the SEC. A graduate of Georgetown Law School,


Table of Contents

Ms. Hechinger has been a member in good standing of the District of Columbia Bar Association since 1975.

        Ms. Hechinger brings to the Board the significant knowledge of corporate governance matters and public policy she has gained through her extensive experience in both the private and public sectors.

Weston M. Hicks

        Mr. Hicks, age 56, was elected a Director of the General Partner in July 2005. He has been a Director and the President and chief executive officer of Alleghany Corporation (NYSE: Y, "Alleghany"), an insurance and diversified financial services holding company, since December 2004 and was Executive Vice President of Alleghany from October 2002 until December 2004. From March 2001 through October 2002, Mr. Hicks was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Chubb Corporation.

        Mr. Hicks brings to the Board extensive financial expertise, including his unique perspective as the chief executive officer of an unaffiliated publicly traded company, his background as a professional investor and CFA charter holder, and his ten years of experience as an equity research analyst.

Andrew J. McMahon

        Mr. McMahon, age 45, was elected a Director of the General Partner in April 2012. Mr. McMahon is President of AXA Equitable and a member of the company's Executive Committee and Board of Directors. In this role, he has responsibility for the company's Financial Protection & Wealth Management business, including life insurance manufacturing, marketing, distribution and in-force management. He joined AXA Equitable in March 2005 as Senior Vice President to launch the company's Strategic Initiatives Group. Later that year, Mr. McMahon was promoted to Executive Vice President and was named Chief Operating Officer of AXA Advisors, the company's broker-dealer and retail distribution channel comprised of approximately 6,000 career contracted financial professionals. He served as Chairman of AXA Advisors from July 2007 to May 2012. Before joining AXA Equitable, Mr. McMahon was a principal at McKinsey & Co. ("McKinsey") and served as a life insurance practice leader in North America. Prior to McKinsey, he spent several years in management positions with various business divisions of General Electric ("GE"). Mr. McMahon has been a Director of AXA Financial, AXA Equitable, MONY and MLOA since May 2011. He is also a member of the Board of Directors of the American Council of Life Insurers.

        Mr. McMahon brings to the Board the in-depth knowledge of finance, retail distribution and insurance he has developed through key roles he has served for AXA, McKinsey and GE.

Kevin Molloy

        Mr. Molloy, age 42, was elected a Director of the General Partner in January 2011. He has been the Business Support and Development representative for AXA Equitable, AXA Investment Managers S.A. (a wholly owned subsidiary of AXA), AXA Japan and AllianceBernstein since January 2011. From April 2010 to December 2010, Mr. Molloy was the Chief Financial Officer of AXA Global Life, a company formed by AXA to accelerate global synergies throughout its Life & Savings business. Prior to serving in this role, he was Senior Vice President of Distribution & Service Finance at AXA Equitable. From November 2003 to April 2007, Mr. Molloy served as Vice President and Head of AXA's North American Investor Relations office. Mr. Molloy joined AXA Equitable in 1999 as Director of Corporate Finance after beginning his career in 1993 as an economist and corporate profits analyst with The United States Department of Commerce's Bureau of Economic Analysis.


Table of Contents

        Mr. Molloy brings to the Board the finance, capital markets and investor relations experience he has developed through the key roles he has served for AXA and the in-depth knowledge of global economies he gained while working for the U.S. government.

Mark Pearson

        Mr. Pearson, age 54, was elected a Director of the General Partner in February 2011. Also during February 2011, he succeeded Mr. Condron as Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of AXA Financial, and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AXA Equitable. Having joined AXA in 1995 when AXA acquired National Mutual Funds Management Limited (presently AXA Asia Pacific Holdings Limited), Mr. Pearson became a member of the Executive Committee of AXA in 2008 and the Management Committee of AXA in 2011. He was appointed Regional Chief Executive of AXA Asia Life in 2001 and, in 2008, was named President and Chief Executive Officer of AXA Japan Holding Co., Ltd. and AXA Life Insurance Co., Ltd. Prior to joining AXA, Mr. Pearson spent approximately 20 years in the insurance sector, holding several senior management positions at National Mutual and Friends Provident.

        Mr. Pearson brings to the Board the in-depth knowledge of Asian markets and diverse experience he has developed through the key roles he has served for AXA.

Lorie A. Slutsky

        Ms. Slutsky, age 60, was elected a Director of the General Partner in July 2002. Since January 1990, she has been President and Chief Executive Officer of The New York Community Trust, a community foundation that manages a $2 billion endowment and annually grants more than $150 million to non-profit organizations. Ms. Slutsky is Secretary and a board member of the Independent Sector and co-chaired its National Panel on the Non-Profit Sector, which focused on reducing abuse and improving governance practices at non-profit organizations. She served on the Board of Directors of BoardSource from 1999 to 2008 and served as its Chair from 2005 to 2007. Ms. Slutsky also served as Trustee and Chair of the Budget Committee of Colgate University from 1989 to 1997 and as a member of the Council on Foundations from 1989 to 1995, for which she also served as Chair from 1993 to 1995. She has been a Director of AXA Financial, AXA Equitable, MONY and MLOA since September 2006. In addition, Ms. Slutsky was a member of AXA Financial's Audit Committee from 2006 through 2010. She has been a member of AXA Financial's Organization and Compensation Committee since 2006 and was elected Chair of the Organization and Compensation Committee in February 2012.

        Ms. Slutsky brings to the Board extensive corporate governance experience achieved through her executive and managerial roles at The New York Community Trust, BoardSource, Independent Sector and various other non-profit organizations. She also brings valuable insight gained from serving on boards and board committees at certain of our parent companies.

A.W. (Pete) Smith, Jr.

        Mr. Smith, age 69, was elected a Director of the General Partner in July 2005. The former CEO of Watson Wyatt Worldwide (now Towers Watson), he was also President of the Private Sector Council, a non-profit public service organization dedicated to improving the efficiency of the federal government, from September 2000 until May 2005. Mr. Smith has been President of Smith Compensation Consulting, a privately held company specializing in executive compensation consulting, since June 2005.

        Mr. Smith brings to the Board extensive financial services expertise, compensation expertise and leadership skills obtained through his wealth of experience as Towers Watson's chief executive and the head of his own firm.


Table of Contents

Peter J. Tobin

        Mr. Tobin, age 68, was elected a Director of the General Partner in May 2000. From September 2003 to June 2005, he was Special Assistant to the President of St. John's University. Prior thereto, Mr. Tobin served as Dean of the Tobin College of Business of St. John's University from August 1998 to September 2003. As Dean, Mr. Tobin was the chief executive and academic leader of the College of Business. Mr. Tobin was Chief Financial Officer at The Chase Manhattan Corporation from 1996 to 1997. Prior thereto, he was Chief Financial Officer of Chemical Bank (which merged with Chase in 1996) from 1991 to 1996 and Chief Financial Officer of Manufacturers Hanover Trust (which merged with Chemical in 1991) from 1985 to 1991. Mr. Tobin has served on the board of directors of CIT Group Inc. (NYSE: CIT) since 1985 (except for one year during which CIT Group was owned by Tyco). Until his retirement in February 2012, he had been a Director of AXA Financial and AXA Equitable since March 1999 and also served on AXA Financial's Audit Committee, Investment Committee, Investment and Finance Committee, Organization and Compensation Committee, and Executive Committee.

        Mr. Tobin brings to the Board invaluable expertise as an audit committee financial expert and key leadership and analytical skills from his positions in academia.

Resignation of Directors and Appointment of New Directors

        On May 21, 2013, Kevin Molloy resigned from the Board in order to focus on his other job-related responsibilities.

        On July 30, 2013, the sole stockholder of the General Partner elected Scott A. Schoen and Joshua A. Weinreich as new members of the Board.

        On September 12, 2013, Andrew J. McMahon resigned as President of AXA Equitable and as a member of AXA Equitable's board of directors. In connection with his resignation, Mr. McMahon also resigned from the board of directors of the General Partner.


Executive Officers (other than Mr. Kraus)

Laurence E. Cranch, General Counsel

        Mr. Cranch, age 66, has been our General Counsel since he joined our firm in 2004. Prior to joining AllianceBernstein, Mr. Cranch was a partner of Clifford Chance, an international law firm. Mr. Cranch joined Clifford Chance in 2000 when Rogers & Wells, a New York law firm of which he was Managing Partner, merged with Clifford Chance.

James A. Gingrich, Chief Operating Officer

        Mr. Gingrich, age 54, joined our firm in 1999 as a senior research analyst with SCB LLC and has been our firm's Chief Operating Officer since December 2011. Prior to becoming COO, Mr. Gingrich held senior managerial positions with SCB LLC, including Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of SCB LLC from February 2007 to November 2011 and Global Director of Research from December 2002 to January 2007.

Lori A. Massad, Head of Human Capital and Chief Talent Officer

        Ms. Massad, age 48, joined our firm in 2006 as Chief Talent Officer. In February 2009, her role was expanded to include oversight of Human Capital in addition to Talent Development. Prior to joining our firm, Ms. Massad served as Chief Talent Officer and Chief Operating Officer at Marakon Associates, a strategy consulting firm from 2004 to 2006. Before joining Marakon, Ms. Massad was a founding member of two start-ups: Spencer Stuart Talent Network (in 2001) and EmployeeMatters, a human resources outsourcing firm (in 2000). Prior to helping found EmployeeMatters, she spent eight years at The Boston Consulting Group, where she became a senior manager on the consulting staff and leader of the firm's recruiting, training and development programs. While with The Boston Consulting Group, Ms. Massad was also an adjunct professor at New York University's Leonard Stern School of Business.


Table of Contents

Robert P. van Brugge, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of SCB LLC

        Mr. van Brugge, age 44, has been Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of SCB LLC since December 2011. Prior to becoming Chairman and CEO, Mr. van Brugge served as Global Director of Research from January 2008 to December 2011. He joined our firm in 2002 as a senior research analyst with SCB LLC.

John C. Weisenseel, Chief Financial Officer

        Mr. Weisenseel, age 53, joined our firm in May 2012 as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. From 2004 to April 2012, he worked at The McGraw Hill Companies ("McGraw Hill"), where he served initially as Senior Vice President and Corporate Treasurer and, since 2007, as Chief Financial Officer of the firm's Standard & Poor's subsidiary. Prior to joining McGraw Hill, Mr. Weisenseel was Vice President and Corporate Treasurer for Barnes & Noble, Inc. Before that, he spent ten years in various derivatives trading and financial positions at Citigroup. A Certified Public Accountant, Mr. Weisenseel also worked at KPMG LLP.


Board Meetings

        In 2012, the Board held regular meetings in February, April, May, August, September and November; the Board held one special meeting in July 2012.

        Generally, the Board holds six meetings annually: in February, April, May, July or August, September, and November. In addition, the Board holds special meetings or takes action by unanimous written consent as circumstances warrant. The Board has standing Executive, Audit, Corporate Governance, Compensation and Special Committees, each of whichis described in further detail below. Each member of the Board attended 75% or more of the aggregate of all Board and committee meetings that he or she was entitled to attend in 2012, except Mr. de Castries.


Committees of the AllianceBernstein Board

        In 2012, the Executive Committee of the Board ("Executive Committee") was composed of Ms. Slutsky and Messrs. Condron, de Castries, Duverne, Kraus (Chair) and Tobin. The Executive Committee exercises all of the powers and authority of the Board (with limited exceptions) when the Board is not in session, or when it is impractical to assemble the full Board. The Executive Committee held four meetings in 2012.

        In 2012, the Governance Committee was composed of Mr. Condron, Mr. Duverne, Ms. Hechinger (Chair), Mr. Kraus and Ms. Slutsky. The Governance Committee (i) assists the Board and the sole stockholder of the General Partner in (1) identifying and evaluating qualified individuals to become Board members and (2) determining the composition of the Board and its committees, and (ii) assists the Board in (1) developing and monitoring a process to assess Board effectiveness, (2) developing and implementing our corporate governance guidelines and (3) reviewing our policies and programs that relate to matters of corporate responsibility of the General Partner and the Partnerships. The Governance Committee held two meetings in 2012.

        In 2012, the Audit Committee of the Board ("Audit Committee") was composed of Messrs. Elliott, Hicks, Smith and Tobin (Chair). The primary purposes of the Audit Committee are to: (i) assist the Board in its oversight of (1) the integrity of the financial statements of the Partnerships, (2) the Partnerships' status and system of compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and business conduct, (3) the independent registered public accounting firm's qualification and independence, and (4) the performance of the Partnerships' internal audit function; and (ii) oversee the appointment, retention, compensation, evaluation and termination of the Partnerships' independent registered public accounting firm. Consistent with this function, the Audit Committee encourages continuous


Table of Contents

improvement of, and fosters adherence to, the Partnerships' policies, procedures and practices at all levels. With respect to these matters, the Audit Committee provides an open avenue of communication among the independent registered public accounting firm, senior management, the Internal Audit Department and the Board. The Audit Committee held eight meetings in 2012.

        In 2012, the Compensation Committee of the Board ("Compensation Committee") was composed of Mr. Condron (Chair), Mr. Duverne, Mr. Elliott, Mr. Kraus, Ms. Slutsky and Mr. Smith. Mr. de Castries served as a member of the Compensation Committee during January 2012; he resigned as a member of the Compensation Committee in February 2012. The Compensation Committee held eight meetings in 2012. For additional information about the Compensation Committee, see"The Companies—AllianceBernstein—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Committee."

        The functions of each of the committees discussed above are more fully described in each committee's charter. The charters are available atwww.alliancebernstein.com, which we refer to as our Internet Site.

        The Special Committee of the Board ("Special Committee") is composed of all of the independent members of the Board and in 2012 included Mr. Elliott, Ms. Hechinger, Mr. Hicks, Ms. Slutsky, Mr. Smith and Mr. Tobin (Chair). The Special Committee has the authority to direct and oversee any matters referred to it by the Board and/or management including, but not limited to, matters relating to conflicts of interest and the relationship among AllianceBernstein, Holding and AXA. The members of the Special Committee do not receive any additional compensation for their service on the Special Committee, apart from the ordinary meeting feesdescribed in "Director Compensation in 2012." The Special Committee did not meet in 2012.


Audit Committee Financial Experts

        In January 2012 and 2013, the Governance Committee, after reviewing materials prepared by management, recommended that the Board determine that each of Steven G. Elliott and Peter J. Tobin is an "audit committee financial expert" within the meaning of Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K. The Board so determined at its regular meetings in February 2012 and 2013. The Board also determined at these meetings that each of Messrs. Elliott, Hicks, Smith and Tobin is financially literate and possesses accounting or related financial management expertise, as contemplated by Section 303A.07(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.


Independence of Certain Directors

        In January 2012 and 2013, the Governance Committee, after reviewing materials prepared by management, recommended that the Board determine that each of Mr. Elliott, Ms. Hechinger, Mr. Hicks, Ms. Slutsky, Mr. Smith and Mr. Tobin is "independent" within the meaning of Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. The Board considered immaterial the relationships of Mr. Elliott (relating to the fact that AllianceBernstein and its family of mutual funds are clients of BNY Mellon and Mr. Elliott's equity stake in BNY Mellon), Mr. Hicks (relating to the fact that Alleghany Corporation is a client of SCB LLC and Mr. Hicks was employed by Bernstein from 1991 to 1999), Ms. Slutsky (relating to contributions formerly made by AllianceBernstein to The New York Community Trust, of which she is President and Chief Executive Officer, and the fact that she is a member of the boards of directors of AXA Financial and AXA Equitable) and Mr. Tobin (relating to the fact that, until his retirement in February 2012, he was a member of the boards of directors of AXA Financial and AXA Equitable) and then determined, at its February 2012 and 2013 regular meetings, that each of Mr. Elliott, Ms. Hechinger, Mr. Hicks, Ms. Slutsky, Mr. Smith and Mr. Tobin is independent within the meaning of the relevant rules.


Table of Contents


Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Leadership

        The Board, together with the Governance Committee, is responsible for reviewing the Board's leadership structure. In determining the appropriate individual to serve as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Board and the Governance Committee consider, among other things, the composition of the Board, the role of the Board's lead director (discussed more fully below), our company's strong corporate governance practices, and the challenges and opportunities specific to our company.

        We believe that there are significant benefits to having the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer shared by one individual, but only if a company has sufficient counter-balancing governance in place. We see significant value in having the leader in the Board room also manage the affairs of our company, and we believe any potential doubts as to our Board's objectivity in evaluating management are offset by the lead independent director we have in place and the fact that the affirmative consent of our largest Unitholder (AXA) is required in order for any action taken by the Executive Committee or the Compensation Committee to be effective.

Lead Independent Director

        Our lead independent director, Peter J. Tobin, was appointed unanimously by our Board in November 2005. He presides at all executive sessions of non-management and independent directors and makes himself available, if requested by Unitholders, for consultation and communication. Interested parties wishing to communicate directly with Mr. Tobin may send an e-mail, with "confidential" in the subject line, to our Corporate Secretary or address mail to Mr. Tobin in care of our Corporate Secretary. Our Corporate Secretary will promptly forward such e-mail or mail to Mr. Tobin. We have posted this information in the "Management & Governance" section of our Internet Site.

Risk Oversight

        The Board, together with the Audit Committee, has oversight for our company's risk management framework, both investment risk and operational risk, and is responsible for helping to ensure that our company's risks are managed in a sound manner. The Board has delegated to the Audit Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors, the responsibility to consider our company's policies and practices with respect to operational risk assessment and operational risk management, including discussing with management the major financial risk exposures and the steps taken to monitor and control such exposures. Members of the company's Risk Management team responsible for identifying, managing and controlling the array of operational and investment risks inherent in our company's business and operations, make quarterly reports to the Audit Committee, including an annual risk review which addresses operational risk identification, assessment and monitoring. The Chief Risk Officer, whose expertise encompasses both quantitative research and associated investment risks, makes periodic presentations to the Board and reports directly to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and commencing in 2013, has a reporting line to the Audit Committee.

        The Board has determined that its leadership and risk oversight are appropriate for our company. Mr. Kraus's in-depth knowledge of financial services and extensive executive experience in the investment management industry make him uniquely suited to serve as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, while Mr. Tobin's leadership and expertise have proven invaluable at enhancing the overall functioning of the Board. The Board believes that the combination of a single Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, a lead independent director, the Audit Committee, a specialized risk management team, and significant involvement from our largest Unitholder (AXA) provide the appropriate leadership to help ensure effective risk oversight by the Board.


Table of Contents


Code of Ethics and Related Policies

        All of our directors, officers and employees are subject to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The code is intended to comply with Section 303A.10 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, Rule 204A-1 under the Investment Advisers Act and Rule 17j-1 under the Investment Company Act, as well as with recommendations issued by the Investment Company Institute regarding, among other things, practices and standards with respect to securities transactions of investment professionals. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics establishes certain guiding principles for all of our employees, including sensitivity to our fiduciary obligations and ensuring that we meet those obligations. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics may be found in the "Management & Governance" section of our Internet Site.

        We have adopted a Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, which is intended to comply with Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Item 406 Code"). The Item 406 Code, which may be found in the "Management & Governance" section of our Internet Site, was adopted on October 28, 2004 by the Executive Committee. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding certain amendments to, or waivers from, provisions of the Item 406 Code that apply to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller by posting such information on our Internet Site. To date, there have been no such amendments or waivers.


NYSE Governance Matters

        Section 303A.00 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual exempts limited partnerships from compliance with the following sections of the Manual: Section 303A.01 (board must have a majority of independent directors), 303A.04 (corporate governance committee must have only independent directors as its members), and 303A.05 (compensation committee must have only independent directors as its members). Holding is a limited partnership (as is AllianceBernstein). In addition, because the General Partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of AXA, and the General Partner controls Holding (and AllianceBernstein), we believe we would also qualify for the "controlled company" exemption. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board has adopted a Corporate Governance Committee Charter that complies with Section 303A.04 and a Compensation Committee Charter that complies with Section 303A.05. However, not all members of these committees are independent.

        Our Corporate Governance Guidelines ("Guidelines") promote the effective functioning of the Board and its committees, promote the interests of the Partnerships' respective Unitholders, with appropriate regard to the Board's duties to the sole stockholder of the General Partner, and set forth a common set of expectations as to how the Board, its various committees, individual directors and management should perform their functions. The Guidelines may be found in the "Management & Governance" section of our Internet Site.

        The Governance Committee is responsible for considering any request for a waiver under the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the Item 406 Code, the AXA Group Compliance and Ethics Guide, and the AXA Financial Policy Statement on Ethics from any director or executive officer of the General Partner. Any such waiver that has been granted would be set forth in the "Management & Governance" section of our Internet Site.

        Our Internet Site, under the heading "Meet our Directors," provides an e-mail address for any interested party, including Unitholders, to communicate with the Board of Directors. Our Corporate Secretary reviews e-mails sent to that address and has some discretion in determining how or whether to respond, and in determining to whom such e-mails should be forwarded. In our experience, substantially all of the e-mails received are ordinary client requests for administrative assistance that are best addressed by management or solicitations of various kinds.


Table of Contents

        The 2012 Certification by our Chief Executive Officer under NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 303A.12(a) was submitted to the NYSE on February 21, 2012.

        Holding Unitholders and AllianceBernstein Unitholders may request a copy of any committee charter, the Guidelines, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and the Item 406 Code by contacting our Corporate Secretary. The charters and memberships of the Executive, Audit, Governance and Compensation Committees may be found in the "Management & Governance" section of our Internet Site.


Fiduciary Culture

        We maintain a robust fiduciary culture and, as a fiduciary, we place the interests of our clients first and foremost. We are committed to the fair and equitable treatment of all our clients, and to compliance with all applicable rules and regulations and internal policies to which our business is subject. We pursue these goals through education of our employees to promote awareness of our fiduciary obligations, incentives that align employees' interests with those of our clients, and a range of measures, including active monitoring, to ensure regulatory compliance. Specific steps we have taken to help us achieve these goals include:

        The Ethics Committee oversees all matters relating to issues arising under our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Ethics Committee meets on a quarterly basis and at such other times as circumstances warrant. The Ethics Committee and its subcommittee, the Personal Trading Subcommittee, have oversight of personal trading by our employees.

        The Compliance Committee reviews compliance issues throughout our Company, endeavors to develop solutions to those issues as they may arise from time to time, and oversees implementation of those solutions. The Compliance Committee meets on a quarterly basis and at such other times as circumstances warrant.


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

        Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires directors of the General Partner and executive officers of the Partnerships, and persons who own more than 10% of the Holding Units or AllianceBernstein Units, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Holding Units or AllianceBernstein Units. To the best of management's knowledge, during 2012: (i) all Section 16(a) filing requirements relating to Holding were complied with, except one Form 4 for each of Edward J. Farrell, James A. Gingrich and Robert P. van Brugge was filed late (each Form 4 related solely to Holding Units withheld during January 2012 to fulfill statutory tax withholding requirements at the time of distribution of long-term incentive compensation awards to each of these officers); and (ii) all Section 16(a) filing requirements relating to AllianceBernstein were complied with. Our Section 16 filings can be found under "Investor & Media Relations" / "Reports & SEC Filings" on our Internet Site.


Table of Contents


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview of Compensation Philosophy and Program

        The intellectual capital of our employees is collectively the most important asset of our firm. We invest in people—we hire qualified people, train them, encourage them to give their best thinking to the firm and our clients, and compensate them in a manner designed to motivate and retain them. As a result, the costs of employee compensation and benefits are significant, comprising approximately 46.1% of our operating expenses and representing approximately 42.7% of our revenues (49.8% of our adjusted net revenues,as defined below) for 2012. Although these percentages are not unusual for companies in the financial services industry, the magnitude of these costs requires that they be monitored by management, and overseen by the Board, with the particular attention of the Compensation Committee of the Board ("Compensation Committee").

        We believe that the quality, skill and dedication of our executives are critical to enhancing the long-term value of our company. Our key compensation goals are to attract, motivate and retain highly qualified executive talent, provide rewards for the past year's performance and provide incentives for future performance, and align our executives' long-term interests with those of our clients and Unitholders. We believe that success in achieving good results for the firm, and for our Unitholders, flows from achieving investment success for our clients. We are focused on ensuring that our compensation practices are competitive with industry peers and provide sufficient potential for wealth creation for our executives and employees, which we believe will enable us to meet our compensation goals.

        We utilize a variety of compensation elements to achieve the goalsdescribed above, including base salary, annual short-term incentive compensation awards (cash bonuses), a long-term incentive compensation award program and a defined contribution plan, all of which arediscussed in detail below.

        In 2011, we implemented changes to our long-term incentive compensation award program to ensure that our compensation practices are competitive and to better align the costs of employee compensation and benefits with the firm's current year financial performance and provide employees with a higher degree of certainty that they will receive the incentive compensation they are awarded. Most equity replacement, sign-on or similar long-term incentive compensation awards included in separate employment agreements or arrangements were not amended in 2011 to reflect these changes.

        The changes implemented in 2011, which have been incorporated into our 2012 long-term incentive compensation program, include the following:

        For information about the accounting impact of the changes implemented in 2011, seeNote 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus.


Table of Contents

Consideration of Risk Matters in Determining Compensation

        We have considered whether our compensation practices encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking and whether any risks arising from our compensation practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. For the reasons set forth below, we have determined that our current compensation practices do not incentivize, and actually discourage, our employees from engaging in unnecessary or excessively risky activities. Accordingly, we have concluded that our compensation practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.

        In our effort to foster the spirit of partnership among our employees and better align their interests with those of Holding Unitholders and our clients, eligible employees receive at least half of their long-term incentive compensation awards in the form of restricted Holding Units, with multi-year vesting periods (generally, four years). Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer firmly believes that compensating key employees with equity ownership fosters a true partnership community, one that will help us grow and achieve our firm's goals. We believe that as our employees become more focused on partnering with each other to achieve our firm's overall goals, they will serve as checks and balances on each other in assessing risk and performance.

        Our approach to long-term incentive compensation is designed to reflect the firm's current year and long-term financial performance and the specific performance of each individual employee. The initial amount of an employee's award is based on the performance of the firm and the employee for the current year. But because a substantial portion of the award is denominated in Holding Units that are not distributed until subsequent years, the ultimate value that the employee derives from the award depends on the long-term performance of the firm. Denominating a substantial portion of the award in Holding Units and deferring their delivery also sensitizes employees to risk outcomes and discourages them from taking excessive risks that could lead to a decrease in the value of the Holding Units. Furthermore,and as noted above, generally all outstanding long-term incentive compensation awards include a provision permitting us to "claw-back" the unvested portion of an employee's long-term incentive compensation award (whether denominated in restricted Holding Units or Deferred Cash) if the Compensation Committee determines that (i) the employee failed to follow existing risk management policies and (ii) as a result of the employee's failure, there has been or reasonably could be expected to be a material adverse impact on our firm or the employee's business unit. We expect to include this provision in the award agreements relating to long-term incentive compensation awards in future years.

Overview of 2012 Incentive Compensation Program

        Our 2012 incentive compensation, generally consisting of annual cash bonuses and long-term incentive compensation awards (restricted Holding Unit awards and Deferred Cash awards to employees with 2012 total compensation in excess of $200,000), is intended to reward our executives and employees for their performance and encourage them to remain with the firm. Annual cash bonuses, which generally reflect individual performance and the firm's current year financial performance, provide a shorter-term incentive to remain through year end because such bonuses are typically paid during the last week of the year. Long-term incentive compensation awards (whether denominated in restricted Holding Units or Deferred Cash) provide future earnings potential. They are subject to multi-year vesting periods (generally, four years) and are subject to forfeiture in the event an award recipient violates certain agreements and restrictive covenants set forth in the applicable award agreement (see"Compensation Elements for Executive Officers—Long-term Incentive Compensation"). Although estimates are developed for budgeting and strategic planning purposes, executive compensation is not correlated with meeting any specific targets (except that some of our salespeople have compensation incentives based on sales levels).


Table of Contents

        The aggregate amount of incentive compensation (i.e., the amount available to pay annual cash bonuses and to grant long-term incentive compensation awards to executives and other eligible employees) generally is determined on a discretionary basis and is primarily a function of our firm's current year financial performance. Amounts are awarded to help us achieve our goal of attracting, motivating and retaining top talent while also helping ensure that our Unitholders receive an appropriate return on their investment. Senior management, with the approval of the Compensation Committee, confirmed that the appropriate metric to consider in determining the amount of incentive compensation for 2012 is the ratio of adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense to adjusted net revenues, both of whichare described immediately below:

        Senior management, with the approval of the Compensation Committee, also confirmed that the firm's adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense should not exceed 50% of our adjusted net revenues, except in unexpected or unusual circumstances. As shown in the table below, in 2012, adjusted employee compensation and benefits expense amounted to 49.8% of adjusted net revenues (in thousands):

Net Revenues

 $2,736,737 

Adjustments (see above)

  (476,436)
    

Adjusted Net Revenues

 $2,260,301 
    

Employee Compensation & Benefits Expense

 $1,168,645 

Adjustments (see above)

  (42,724)
    

Adjusted Employee Compensation & Benefits Expense

 $1,125,921 
    

Adjusted Compensation Ratio

  49.8%
    

        For the year ended December 31, 2012, the adjusted compensation ratio included incremental compensation expense recognized during the third and fourth quarters of 2012 attributable to the restricted Holding Unit award granted to our Chief Executive Officer pursuant to his extended employment agreement dated as of June 21, 2012 (discussed below in "Overview of our Chief Executive Officer's Compensation—June 2012 Extended Employment Agreement," "Extended Employment Agreement"). Under U.S. GAAP, the compensation expense for the restricted Holding Unit award granted pursuant to the Extended Employment Agreement, which amounted to $33.1 million (based on the $12.17 grant date Holding Unit price), must be amortized on a straight-line basis over 6.5 years, beginning on June 21, 2012, the grant date. As a result, even though Mr. Kraus will not receive any incremental cash compensation or cash distributions related to the restricted Holding Unit award pursuant to the Extended Employment Agreement prior to its commencement date on January 3, 2014, we incurred $2.5 million of incremental compensation expense resulting from such amortization during the second half of 2012 and will incur $5.1 million of such expense for the full year 2013.


Table of Contents

        Our 2012 adjusted compensation ratio of approximately 50% reflects the need to keep compensation levels competitive with industry peers. In determining the appropriate level of compensation for the firm's executives, senior management retained McLagan Partners ("McLagan") to provide compensation benchmarking data that included comparisons of estimated 2012 executive compensation to executive compensation in 2011.

        Employees with total compensation in excess of $200,000 received a portion of their 2012 incentive compensation in the form of a cash bonus and a portion in the form of long-term incentive compensation (at least 50% of which must have been allocated to restricted Holding Units). The split between cash bonus and long-term incentive compensation varied depending on the eligible employee's total compensation, with lower-paid employees receiving a greater percentage of their incentive compensation as cash bonuses than more highly paid employees. Quarterly cash distributions on vested and unvested restricted Holding Units are paid currently to award recipients. If Deferred Cash is elected, interest accrues monthly based on our monthly weighted average cost of funds and is credited to the award recipient annually. Our cost of funds during 2012 was approximately 0.4%, representing a nominal return.


Overview of our Chief Executive Officer's Compensation

Current Employment Agreement

        On December 19, 2008, Peter S. Kraus, the General Partner, AllianceBernstein and Holding entered into an agreement ("Kraus Employment Agreement") pursuant to which Mr. Kraus serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the General Partner and Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") of the General Partner, AllianceBernstein and Holding until January 2, 2014 ("Employment Term"), unless the Kraus Employment Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms.

        The terms of the Kraus Employment Agreement were the result of arm's-length negotiations between Mr. Kraus and a member of the Compensation Committee. The terms of the Kraus Employment Agreement (which are described in detail immediately below), including the compensation elements, were discussed and approved by the Compensation Committee and the full Board on December 19, 2008 and reflect their decision to structure the allocation of Mr. Kraus's compensation more heavily toward a grant of restricted Holding Units.

        In connection with the commencement of Mr. Kraus's employment, on December 19, 2008, he was granted 2,722,052 restricted Holding Units ("Restricted Holding Unit Grant"). Subject to accelerated vesting clauses in the Kraus Employment Agreement, Mr. Kraus's restricted Holding Units vest ratably on each of the first five anniversaries of December 19, 2008, commencing December 19, 2009, provided, with respect to each installment, Mr. Kraus continues to be employed by AllianceBernstein on the vesting date. In connection with the Extended Employment Agreement (which is described in detail below), AllianceBernstein amended the Kraus Employment Agreement permitting Mr. Kraus to defer until December 19, 2018 the delivery of the final vesting of the 544,410 restricted Holding Units remaining under that agreement and to continue to receive distributions on those Holding Units until such delivery.

        The Kraus Employment Agreement provides for immediate vesting upon AXA ceasing to control the management of AllianceBernstein's business or Holding ceasing to be publicly traded. The Kraus Employment Agreement also provides for the immediate vesting of the next two installments of restricted Holding Units or, if fewer remain as of the termination date, the balance of the installments that are unvested, upon certain qualifying terminations of employment, including termination of Mr. Kraus's employment (i) by AllianceBernstein without cause ("cause" means, among other things, (1) the continued, willful failure by Mr. Kraus to perform substantially his duties with AllianceBernstein after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to him by the Board; (2) Mr. Kraus's conviction of, or plea of guilty ornolo contendere to, a crime that constitutes a felony; (3) the willful


Table of Contents

engaging by Mr. Kraus in misconduct that is materially and demonstrably injurious to AllianceBernstein or any of its affiliates; (4) the willful breach by Mr. Kraus of the covenant not to disclose any confidential information pertaining to AllianceBernstein or its affiliates or the covenant not to compete with AllianceBernstein or its affiliates; and (5) Mr. Kraus's failure to comply with a material written company workplace policy applicable to him), and (ii) by Mr. Kraus for good reason ("good reason" generally means actions taken by AllianceBernstein resulting in a material negative change in Mr. Kraus's employment relationship, including assignment to Mr. Kraus of duties materially inconsistent with his position, any material breach of the Kraus Employment Agreement by AllianceBernstein or a requirement by AllianceBernstein that Mr. Kraus be based at any office or location more than 25 miles commuting distance from company headquarters, or a requirement that Mr. Kraus report to an officer or employee of AllianceBernstein instead of reporting directly to the Board). In addition, upon death or disability, Mr. Kraus immediately vests in a pro-rated portion of any restricted Holding Units otherwise due to vest on the next vesting date. During the Employment Term, Mr. Kraus has been, and continues to be, paid the cash distributions payable with respect to his unvested restricted Holding Units and a dollar amount equal to the cash distributions payable with respect to the number of any Holding Units that are withheld by AllianceBernstein to cover Mr. Kraus's tax withholding obligations as the Holding Units vest. These cash distributions have been, and continue to be, paid at the time distributions are made to Holding Unitholders generally, provided that no such payments to Mr. Kraus will be required with respect to any cash distribution with a record date following the earlier of (i) the termination of Mr. Kraus's employment for any reason, and (ii) December 19, 2018.

        The five-year vesting schedule provides Mr. Kraus with a strong incentive to remain with our firm for the full five-year term of the Kraus Employment Agreement and to cause our firm to have strong financial performance during each of those five years. The size of the Restricted Holding Unit Grant, which had a value of approximately $52 million based on the market price of a Holding Unit on December 19, 2008, reflected the determination by Mr. Kraus and the Board that this was a reasonable and appropriate amount of long-term incentive compensation in view of Mr. Kraus's expertise and experience, his past compensation, the compensation of his predecessor and the compensation of other chief executive officers of comparable asset management companies.

        Mr. Kraus, pursuant to the Kraus Employment Agreement, was paid a $6 million cash bonus in 2009, which represented the amount that Mr. Kraus and the Board agreed represented a reasonable and appropriate short-term financial inducement for Mr. Kraus to join AllianceBernstein based on the same factors (listed immediately above) and reflected the significant uncertainty surrounding the level of 2009 quarterly cash distributions on Holding Units when he was hired; it most directly reflects the company's goal of attracting highly qualified executive talent.

        Mr. Kraus is paid an annual base salary of $275,000, which has not been increased since he was hired. The $275,000 base salary is in line with our firm's policy generally to keep base salaries of executives and other highly compensated employees low in relation to total compensation.

        During the Employment Term, AllianceBernstein has no commitment to pay additional cash bonuses to Mr. Kraus beyond the $6 million he was paid in 2009 (with any additional bonuses being entirely in the discretion of the Compensation Committee) or to make any additional equity-based awards to him. Accordingly, for 2010 and subsequent years during the Employment Term, the totality of Mr. Kraus's compensation (other than his salary and absent any additional awards the Compensation Committee may choose to grant) has been, and continues to be, dependent on the level of cash distributions on the restricted Holding Units granted to him and the evolution of the trading price of Holding Units, both of which are partially dependent on the financial and operating results of our firm. Therefore, his long-term interests are directly aligned with the interests of our Unitholders and also indirectly aligned with the interests of our clients, as strong performance for our clients generally


Table of Contents

contributes directly to increases in assets under management and thus improved financial performance for the firm.

        Mr. Kraus received neither a cash bonus nor a long-term incentive compensation award for 2012, 2011 or 2010.

        Mr. Kraus is also entitled to receive perquisites and benefits, including full tax gross-ups by AllianceBernstein with respect to personal air travel on company-owned aircraft, personal use of a company car and driver, any continued medical coverage due to termination by death or disability, and any payments for COBRA coverage due to termination of employment by AllianceBernstein without cause or by Mr. Kraus for good reason. These terms reflect the results of the arm's-length negotiation processdescribed immediately above.

June 2012 Extended Employment Agreement

        On June 21, 2012, Mr. Kraus, the General Partner, AllianceBernstein and Holding entered into the Extended Employment Agreement, pursuant to which Mr. Kraus will continue to serve as Chairman of the Board of the General Partner and CEO of the General Partner, AllianceBernstein and Holding from January 3, 2014, the day following the end of the Employment Term, until January 2, 2019 (the "Extended Employment Term"), unless the Extended Employment Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms. Although the Extended Employment Term does not begin until January 3, 2014, certain provisions of the Extended Employment Agreement became effective on entry into the agreement, including those provisionssummarized below relating to the grant of additional restricted Holding Units and termination of employment.

        The terms of the Extended Employment Agreement were the result of arm's-length negotiations between Mr. Kraus, members of the Compensation Committee, who discussed this matter during four Special Meetings of the Compensation Committee, and other members of the Board. In addition, the Compensation Committee considered comparative compensation benchmarking data from Johnson Associates, Inc. ("Johnson"), a compensation consultant engaged by the Compensation Committee, which data summarized CEO compensation levels for 2011 at selected asset management companies and banks comparable to ours. This data provided ranges of compensation levels for CEOs at these companies, including salary, cash bonus, total cash compensation and total compensation. The terms of the Extended Employment Agreement (which are described in detail immediately below), including the compensation elements, were discussed and approved first by the Compensation Committee and then by the Executive Committee and reflect both Committees' decision to structure the allocation of Mr. Kraus's compensation heavily toward an additional grant of restricted Holding Units. The Executive Committee exercises all of the powers and authority of the full Board (with limited exceptions) when the Board is not in session or when it is impractical to assemble the full Board. For additional information regarding the Executive Committee, see"Committees of the Board."

        In connection with the signing of the Extended Employment Agreement on June 21, 2012, Mr. Kraus was granted an additional 2,722,052 restricted Holding Units. Subject to accelerated vesting clauses in the Extended Employment Agreement (e.g., immediate vesting upon AXA ceasing to control the management of AllianceBernstein's business or Holding ceasing to be publicly traded), Mr. Kraus's restricted Holding Units will vest ratably on each of the first five anniversaries of December 19, 2013, commencing December 19, 2014, provided, with respect to each installment, Mr. Kraus continues to be employed by AllianceBernstein on the vesting date. Pursuant to the Extended Employment Agreement, Mr. Kraus has elected to delay delivery of all of the restricted Holding Units until after the final vesting date on December 19, 2018, subject to acceleration upon a "change in control" of our firm (i.e., AXA, our parent company, ceasing to control the management of AllianceBernstein's business or Holding ceasing to be publicly traded) and certain qualifying events of termination of employment. Beginning January 3, 2014, the commencement date of the Extended Employment Agreement, Mr. Kraus will be


Table of Contents

paid the cash distributions payable with respect to his unvested and vested restricted Holding Units until they are delivered or forfeited. These cash distributions will be paid at the time distributions are made to Holding Unitholders generally.

        The terms set forth in the Extended Employment Agreement regarding potential payments to Mr. Kraus upon a change in control of AllianceBernstein or a termination of employment are substantially the same as the comparable terms in the Kraus Employment Agreement (see"Overview of our Chief Executive Officer's Compensation—Current Employment Agreement" above), except for the terms governing a termination of employment by AllianceBernstein without "cause" or by Mr. Kraus for "good reason." If the Extended Employment Agreement had been terminated for one of these reasons before December 19, 2012, Mr. Kraus would have forfeited the entire restricted Holding Unit award granted under the Extended Employment Agreement. If the Extended Employment Agreement is terminated for one of these reasons after December 19, 2012 but before December 19, 2013, Mr. Kraus immediately will vest in the installment of restricted Holding Units scheduled to vest on December 19, 2014. If the Extended Employment Agreement is terminated for one of these reasons after December 19, 2013, Mr. Kraus immediately will vest in the next two installments of restricted Holding Units or, if fewer remain as of the termination date, the balance of the installments that are unvested.

        Mr. Kraus will continue to be paid an annual base salary of $275,000, subject to increase by the Compensation Committee.

        During the Extended Employment Term, AllianceBernstein has no commitment to pay any cash bonuses to Mr. Kraus (with any bonuses being entirely in the discretion of the Compensation Committee) or to make any additional equity-based awards to him. Accordingly, during the Extended Employment Term, the totality of Mr. Kraus's compensation (other than his salary) will continue to be primarily dependent on the level of cash distributions on the restricted Holding Units granted to him and the trading price of Holding Units, both of which are partially dependent on the financial and operating results of our firm. Therefore, his long-term interests continue to be directly aligned with the interests of our Unitholders and also indirectly aligned with the interests of our clients, as strong performance for our clients generally contributes directly to increases in assets under management and thus improved financial performance for the firm.

        The terms in the Extended Employment Agreement regarding perquisites and benefits are substantially the same as the comparable terms in the Kraus Employment Agreement (see"Overview of our Chief Executive Officer's Compensation—Current Employment Agreement" above), except that, starting January 3, 2014, Mr. Kraus will reimburse AllianceBernstein for any incremental cost to AllianceBernstein associated with his personal use of company-owned aircraft and will not be entitled to tax gross-ups by AllianceBernstein with respect to personal use of company-owned aircraft or personal use of a company car and driver. These terms reflect the results of the arm's length negotiation processdescribed above.

        During the second quarter of 2012, Johnson provided us with comparative compensation benchmarking data, which summarized CEO compensation levels for 2011 at selected asset management companies and banks comparable to ours.As noted above, this data provided ranges of compensation levels for CEOs at these companies, including salary, cash bonus, total cash compensation and total compensation. The comparable companies, which were selected by management with input from Johnson in order to provide appropriate comparisons for the size and business mix of AllianceBernstein, include Affiliated Managers, Ameriprise Financial, Bank of New York Mellon, BlackRock Financial Management, Credit Suisse Asset Management, Eaton Vance, Federated Investors, Franklin Resources, Invesco Plc, Janus Capital Group, JPMorgan Asset Management, Lazard, Legg Mason, Morgan Stanley, Northern Trust Corp., State Street and T. Rowe Price Associates.


Table of Contents

Factors Considered when Determining Executive Compensation

        Decisions about executive compensation are based primarily on our assessment of each executive's leadership, operational performance and potential to enhance investment returns and service for our clients, all of which contribute to long-term Unitholder value. We do not utilize quantitative formulas when determining the compensation of our CEO, our Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), our Former Interim CFO and our other three most highly compensated executive officers ("named executive officers"), but rather rely on our judgment about each executive's performance and whether each particular payment or award provides an appropriate reward for the executive officer's and the firm's current year performance. We begin this process by determining the total incentive compensation amounts available for a particular year (as more fully explained above in "Overview of 2012 Incentive Compensation Program"). We then consider a number of key factors for each of the named executive officers (other than Mr. Kraus, our CEO, whose compensationis described above in "Overview of our Chief Executive Officer's Compensation"). These factors include: total compensation paid to the named executive officer in the previous year; the increase or decrease in the current year's total incentive compensation amounts available; the named executive officer's performance compared to individual business and operational goals established at the beginning of the year (or, in the case of Mr. Weisenseel, our CFO, the business and operational goals established when he joined us in May 2012); the nature, scope and level of responsibilities of the named executive officer; the contribution to our overall financial results; and the contribution of the executive's business unit to our company's fiduciary culture in which clients' interests are paramount. In 2012, we also considered data provided by McLagan to benchmark the total compensation paid to each of our named executive officers.

        This process, which is conducted by the CEO working with other members of senior management, results in specific incentive compensation recommendations to the Compensation Committee supported by the factors considered. The Compensation Committee then makes the final incentive compensation decisions. The Compensation Committee does not analyze quantifiable goals relating to the firm's business units in determining the cash bonus of each of the named executive officers.

        In addition to our CEO, our CFO and our other three most highly compensated executive officers, for 2012, pursuant to applicable SEC rules and regulations, we also included our former Interim CFO, who returned to his duties as our firm's Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer after Mr. Weisenseel joined our firm in May 2012, as a "named executive officer."

        The priorities of our named executive officers (other than Mr. Kraus) generally include a robust set of factors relating to our firm's financial performance, its strategic and operational considerations, the specific business or function headed by each named executive officer, and each named executive officer's management effectiveness, talent development and adherence to our firm's culture, including risk/control management and regulatory compliance. Because specific factors will vary among business units, among individuals and during different business cycles, we do not adopt any specific weighting or formula under which these metrics are applied.

        We have described below the business and operational goals established in 2012 for our named executive officers (other than Mr. Kraus) and the contribution to our company each made in achieving these goals:


Table of Contents


Table of Contents

        Consistent with the management approach taken by AllianceBernstein for its executives generally, the 2012 goals of our named executive officers (other than Mr. Kraus, whose compensationis described above in "Overview of our Chief Executive Officer's Compensation") did not include specific revenue or profit targets. By their nature, the business and operational goals for each of these other named executive officers are difficult to measure quantitatively and thus management uses discretion to determine whether those goals and objectives have been met.


Table of Contents

        During the fourth quarter of 2012, McLagan provided us with comparative compensation benchmarking data, which summarized compensation levels for the prior year at selected asset management companies and banks comparable to ours. This data provides ranges of compensation levels for executive positions at these companies similar to those held by our named executive officers, including salary, total cash compensation and total compensation. The comparable companies, which are selected by management with input from McLagan in order to provide appropriate comparisons for the size and business mix of AllianceBernstein and the roles played by the named executive officers, include Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Barclays Capital Group, BlackRock, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Franklin Templeton, Goldman Sachs & Co., Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Invesco Plc, JPMorgan Asset Management, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Nomura Securities, PIMCO Advisors, T. Rowe Price Associates, UBS and The Vanguard Group.

        Our CEO, and the Compensation Committee, retain discretion as to how to utilize the McLagan benchmarking data. The data is not used in a formulaic or mechanical way to determine named executive officer compensation levels. Total compensation paid to our named executive officers in 2012 fell within or below the ranges of total compensation paid to executives in similar positions by the companies included in the McLagan data. The Compensation Committee considered the McLagan data in concluding that the compensation levels paid in 2012 to our named executive officers were appropriate and reasonable.

        The Board, when it reviewed and approved the Kraus Employment Agreement in December 2008, also considered the McLagan data, which indicated that Mr. Kraus's compensation arrangement was fully competitive, reasonable and appropriate given our size, scope and complexity, and Mr. Kraus's experience, credentials and proven track record. Similarly, the Compensation Committee and the Executive Committee, in connection with the review and subsequent approval of the Extended Employment Agreement in June 2012, considered the Johnson data, which indicated that the compensation terms for Mr. Kraus set forth in the agreement were fully competitive and consistent with industry standards given our size, scope and complexity, the importance of CEO continuity, Mr. Kraus's experience and integral role in the ongoing execution of our firm's long-term growth strategy, and the overwhelming equity focus of his compensation.

Compensation Elements for Executive Officers

        Below we describe the major elements of our executive compensation.

        1.    Base Salary.    Base salaries comprise a relatively small portion of our executives' total compensation and are maintained at levels generally lower than the salaries of executives at peer firms. Within the narrow range of base salaries paid to our executives, we consider individual experience, responsibilities and tenure with the firm. The salaries we paid during 2012 to our named executive officers are shown in column (c) of the Summary Compensation Table.

        2.    Short-term Incentive Compensation (Cash Bonus).    In 2012, we paid annual cash bonuses in late December to reward individual performance for the year. These bonuses are based on management's evaluation (subject to the Compensation Committee's review and approval) of each executive's performance during the year, and the performance of the executive's business unit or function, compared to business and operational goals established at the beginning of the year, and in the context of the firm's current year financial performance. The cash bonuses we awarded in 2012 to our named executive officers are shown in column (d) of the Summary Compensation Table.

        3.    Long-term Incentive Compensation.    In 2012, we granted annual long-term incentive compensation awards in December to supplement cash bonuses and to encourage retention of our executives. These awards are made under an unfunded, non-qualified incentive compensation plan under which awards may be granted to eligible employees.


Table of Contents

        As discussed above in "Overview of 2012 Incentive Compensation Program," long-term incentive compensation awards generally are denominated in restricted Holding Units. We employ this structure to directly align our executives' long-term interests with the interests of our Unitholders while also indirectly aligning our executives' long-term interests with the interests of our clients, as strong performance for our clients generally contributes directly to increases in assets under management and thus improved financial performance for the firm. The 2012 long-term incentive compensation awards granted to our named executive officers are shown in column (e) of the Summary Compensation Table, column (i) of the Grants of Plan-based Awards Table and column (g) of the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2012 Fiscal Year End Table.

        Long-term incentive compensation was awarded in 2012 as part of total incentive compensation based on a customized set of goals for each executive. The relative level of cash bonus compared to long-term incentive compensation is generally fixed using a sliding scale based on the total compensation level of the executive, with lower-paid executives receiving a greater percentage of their incentive compensation as cash bonuses than more highly paid executives.

        In 2012, the number of restricted Holding Units comprising long-term incentive compensation awards was based on the average of the closing prices of a Holding Unit as reported for NYSE composite transactions for the five business day period that commenced on January 14, 2013 and concluded on January 18, 2013 (this calculation resulted in an average price of $19.972); the Compensation Committee approved the awards on December 3, 2012.

        Long-term incentive compensation awards generally vest ratably over four years. However, award recipients who terminate their employment or are terminated without cause continue to vest in their long-term incentive compensation awards if the award recipients comply with certain agreements and restrictive covenants set forth in the applicable award agreement, including restrictions on competition, employee and client solicitation, and a claw-back for failing to follow existing risk management policies.

        Withdrawals prior to vesting are not permitted. Upon vesting, awards are distributed to participants unless the award recipient has, in advance, voluntarily elected to defer receipt to future periods. Quarterly cash distributions on vested and unvested restricted Holding Units are paid currently to award recipients and are included in column (i) of the Summary Compensation Table.

        4.    Defined Contribution Plan.    Employees of AllianceBernstein are eligible to participate in the Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of AllianceBernstein L.P. (as amended and restated as of January 1, 2010, "Profit Sharing Plan"), a tax-qualified retirement plan. The Compensation Committee determines the amount of company contributions (both the level of annual matching by the firm of an employee's pre-tax salary deferral contributions and the annual company profit sharing contribution). For 2012, the Compensation Committee determined that employee deferral contributions would be matched on a one-to-one basis up to five percent of eligible compensation and there would be no profit sharing contribution. Company contributions to the Profit Sharing Plan on behalf of the named executive officers are shown in column (i) of the Summary Compensation Table.

        5.    CEO Arrangements.    See "Overview of our Chief Executive Officer's Compensation"above.

Compensation Committee

        In 2012, the Compensation Committee was composed of Mr. Condron (Chair), Mr. Duverne, Mr. Elliott, Mr. Kraus, Ms. Slutsky and Mr. Smith. Mr. de Castries resigned as a member of the Compensation Committee in February 2012. The Compensation Committee held eight meetings in 2012.

        Because Holding is a limited partnership, it is exempt from NYSE rules that require public companies to have a compensation committee composed solely of independent directors. AXA owns, indirectly, an approximate 65.5% economic interest in AllianceBernstein (as of December 31, 2012),


Table of Contents

and compensation expense is a significant component of our financial results. For these reasons, Mr. Duverne, Deputy Chief Executive Officer of AXA, is a member of the Compensation Committee, and any action taken by the Compensation Committee requires the affirmative vote or consent of an executive officer of one or more of our parent companies. (Presently, Mr. Duverne is the only member of the Compensation Committee who is also an executive officer of one or more of our parent companies.)

        The Compensation Committee has general oversight of compensation and compensation-related matters, including:

        In 2007, the Compensation Committee delegated responsibility for managing AllianceBernstein's non-qualified plans to the Omnibus Committee for Non-Qualified Plans ("Omnibus Committee"), consisting of six members who are senior officers of AllianceBernstein. The Omnibus Committee held four meetings in 2012.

        The Compensation Committee's year-end process has generally focused on the cash bonuses and long-term incentive compensation awards granted to senior management. Mr. Kraus plays an active role in the work of the Compensation Committee, but he does not participate in any committee discussions or votes regarding his own compensation. Mr. Kraus, working with other members of senior management, provides recommendations for individual employee awards to the Compensation Committee for its consideration. As part of this process, management provides the committee with compensation benchmarking data from compensation consultants. For 2012, we paid $17,120 to McLagan for executive compensation benchmarking data and an additional $274,680 for survey and consulting services relating to the amount and form of compensation paid to employees other than executives.

        The Compensation Committee held its regularly scheduled meeting regarding year-end compensation on December 3, 2012, at which it discussed and approved senior management's compensation recommendations. The Compensation Committee retained Johnson when considering whether to approve the Extended Employment Agreement, but did not retain its own consultants for general employee compensation purposes.

        The Compensation Committee's functions are more fully described in the committee's charter, which is available online in the "Management & Governance" section of our Internet Site.


Table of Contents

Other Compensation-Related Matters

        AllianceBernstein and Holding are, respectively, private and public limited partnerships, and are subject to taxes other than federal and state corporate income tax. Accordingly, Section 162(m) of the Code, which limits tax deductions relating to executive compensation otherwise available to entities taxed as corporations, is not applicable to either AllianceBernstein or Holding.

        We have amended our qualified and non-qualified plans to the extent necessary to comply with applicable law.

        For long-term incentive compensation awards made during or before 2008, we typically purchased the investments that were notionally elected by plan participants and held these investments in a consolidated rabbi trust. Effective January 1, 2009, investments we previously made in our investment services offered to clients are held in a custodial account, while we continue to hold investments in Holding Units in the consolidated rabbi trust. These investments are subject to the general creditors of AllianceBernstein.

        All compensation awards approved during 2012 that involve the issuance of Holding Units were made under the 2010 Plan.


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

        Mr. de Castries, who was a member of the Compensation Committee from February 2011 through February 2012, is the Chief Executive Officer of AXA, the ultimate parent of the General Partner.

        Mr. Duverne is the Deputy Chief Executive Officer of AXA.

        Mr. Condron served as the Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of AXA Equitable, the sole stockholder of the General Partner, until his retirement on January 1, 2011.

        As of December 31, 2012, AXA Equitable and its affiliates owned an aggregate 65.5% economic interest in AllianceBernstein.

        Mr. Kraus is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner and, accordingly, also serves in that capacity for AllianceBernstein and Holding. Mr. Kraus is also a director of AXA Financial, AXA Equitable, MONY and MLOA. In addition, Mr. Kraus is a member of the Management Board of AXA. Other than Mr. Kraus, no executive officer of AllianceBernstein served as (i) a member of a compensation committee or (ii) a director of another entity, an executive officer of which served as a member of AllianceBernstein's Compensation Committee or Board.


Compensation Committee Report

        The members of the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above and, based on such review and discussion, recommended to the Board its inclusion.

Christopher M. Condron (Chair) Denis Duverne  
Steven G. Elliott Peter S. Kraus  
Lorie A. Slutsky A.W. (Pete) Smith, Jr.  

Table of Contents


Summary Compensation Table

        The following table summarizes the total compensation of our named executive officers for 2012, 2011 and 2010, as applicable (including Mr. Farrell, who ceased serving as our firm's Interim CFO when Mr. Weisenseel joined our firm in May 2012 and, accordingly, is no longer an executive officer):

Name and Principal Position Year Salary
($)
 Bonus
($)
 Stock
Awards(1)(2)
($)
 Option
Awards
($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
 Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
 All Other
Compensation
($)
 Total
($)
 
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) 

Peter S. Kraus(3)

  2012  275,000    33,127,373        2,634,830  36,037,203 

Chairman and Chief Executive

  2011  275,000            3,982,527  4,257,527 

Officer

  2010  275,000            4,328,020  4,603,020 

James A. Gingrich

  
2012
  
400,000
  
2,485,000
  
3,114,993
  
  
  
  
304,781
  
6,304,774
 

Chief Operating Officer

  2011  400,000  1,685,000  1,915,000        346,352  4,346,352 

  2010  400,000  1,311,092  2,638,921        155,586  4,505,599 

Robert P. van Brugge(4)(6)

  
2012
  
389,808
  
1,490,778
  
1,609,224
  
  
  
  
86,237
  
3,576,047
 

Chairman and CEO of SCB LLC

  2011  375,000  1,470,000  930,002        356,910  3,131,912 

Lori A. Massad(5)

  
2012
  
400,000
  
805,000
  
595,006
  
  
  
  
128,851
  
1,928,857
 

Head of Human Capital and Chief Talent Officer

                            

John C. Weisenseel(7)

  
2012
  
229,327
  
755,050
  
1,244,969
  
  
  
  
40,207
  
2,269,553
 

Chief Financial Officer

                            

Edward J. Farrell(4)(8)

  
2012
  
300,000
  
410,000
  
214,999
  
  
  
  
51,212
  
976,211
 

Former Interim Chief Financial

  2011  300,000  515,000  285,005        47,633  1,147,638 

Officer

                            

(1)
The figures in column (e) of the above table provide the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For the assumptions made in determining these values, seeNote 18 to our consolidated financial statements contained in proxy statement/prospectus.

(2)
As discussed above in "Overview of 2012 Incentive Compensation Program" and "Compensation Elements for Executive Officers—Long-term Incentive Compensation," long-term incentive compensation awards generally are denominated in restricted Holding Units. We employ this structure to directly align our executives' long-term interests with the interests of our Unitholders while also indirectly aligning our executives' long-term interests with the interests of our clients, as strong performance for our clients generally contributes directly to increases in assets under management and thus improved financial performance for the firm. The 2012 long-term incentive compensation awards granted to our named executive officers are shown in column (e) of this table, column (i) of the Grant of Plan-Based Awards Table and column (g) of the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2012 Fiscal Year-End Table.

In 2012, the number of restricted Holding Units comprising long-term incentive compensation awards was based on the average of the closing prices of a Holding Unit as reported for NYSE composite transactions for the five business day period that commenced on January 14, 2013 and concluded on January 18, 2013 (this calculation resulted in an average price of $19.972); the Compensation Committee approved the awards on December 3, 2012.

(3)
Mr. Kraus's compensation structure is set forth in the Kraus Employment Agreement and the Extended Employment Agreement; the terms of each aredescribed above in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Overview of our Chief Executive Officer's Compensation" and below in "Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control."

(4)
We have not provided 2010 compensation because neither Mr. van Brugge nor Mr. Farrell was a named executive officer in 2010.

(5)
We have not provided 2011 or 2010 compensation because Ms. Massad was not a named executive officer in those years.

(6)
The 2011 bonus disclosed in column (d) for Mr. van Brugge includes a $1,220,000 cash bonus paid to Mr. van Brugge in December 2011 and the $250,000 portion of Mr. van Brugge's 2011 long-term incentive compensation award under the Incentive Compensation Program he elected to allocate to Deferred Cash. The Deferred Cash accrues interest monthly based on our monthly weighted average cost of funds (approximately 0.4% during 2012) and will be credited to Mr. van Brugge annually until the cash is distributed to him in installments over the four-year vesting period. The interest on Mr. van Brugge's Deferred Cash is shown in column (d) of the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table.

(7)
On May 14, 2012, Mr. Weisenseel joined our firm as Chief Financial Officer. We did not pay Mr. Weisenseel any compensation during 2011 or 2010.

Table of Contents

(8)
Mr. Farrell continued as our firm's Corporate Controller after Mr. Weisenseel joined our firm in May 2012.

        Column (i) includes the aggregate incremental cost to our company of certain other expenses and perquisites, including leased car and driver expenses, contributions to the Profit Sharing Plan, life insurance premiums, medical and dental coverage, financial planning, and tax services and tax gross-ups, as applicable.

        In accordance with the Kraus Employment Agreement and the Restricted Holding Unit Grant, Mr. Kraus is paid the cash distributions payable with respect to his unvested restricted Holding Units and a dollar amount equal to the cash distributions payable with respect to the number of any Holding Units that are withheld by AllianceBernstein to cover Mr. Kraus's tax withholding obligations as the Holding Units vest.

        For 2012, column (i) includes:


Table of Contents

        For additional information regarding the compensation of our named executive officers, including their respective business and operational goals, see "Factors Considered when Determining Executive Compensation" and "Compensation Elements for Executive Officers" above.

        During 2012, we owned a fractional interest in an aircraft with an aggregate operating cost of $344,338 (including $86,119 in maintenance fees, $201,132 in usage fees and $57,087 of amortization expense). We sold this fractional interest during 2012. We also leased two aircraft during 2012 with an aggregate operating cost of $7,224,347 (including $2,116,247 in leasing costs, $2,092,718 in maintenance fees and $3,015,382 in usage fees).

        Our interests in aircraft facilitate business travel of senior management. In 2012, we permitted our Chief Executive Officer to use the aircraft for personal travel. His personal travel constituted approximately 17.6% of our actual use of the aircraft in 2012.

        Our methodology for determining the reported value of personal use of aircraft includes fees paid to the managers of the aircraft (fees take into account the aircraft type and weight, number of miles flown, flight time, number of passengers, and a variable fee), but excludes our fixed costs (amortization of original cost less estimated residual value and monthly maintenance fees). We included such amounts in column (i).

        We use the Standard Industry Fare Level ("SIFL") methodology to calculate the amount to include in the taxable income of executives for the personal use of company-owned aircraft. Using the SIFL methodology, which was approved by our Compensation Committee, limits our ability to deduct the full cost of personal use of company-owned aircraft by our executive officers. Taxable income for the 12 months ended October 31, 2012 for personal use imputed to Mr. Kraus is $84,897.


Grants of Plan-based Awards in 2012

        The following table describes each grant of an award made to a named executive officer during 2012 under the 2010 Plan, an equity compensation plan:

 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
  
  
 
 
  
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
 Exercise or
Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
 Grant Date
Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards
($)
 
Name Grant
Date
 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) 

Peter S. Kraus(1)

  6/21/2012              2,722,052      33,127,373 

James A. Gingrich(2)(3)

  12/3/2012              155,968      3,114,993 

Robert P. van Brugge(2)(3)

  12/3/2012              80,574      1,609,224 

Lori A. Massad(2)(3)

  12/3/2012              29,792      595,006 

John C. Weisenseel(2)(3)(4)

  12/3/2012              12,265      244,957 

  5/14/2012              69,629      1,000,012 

Edward J. Farrell(2)(3)

  12/3/2012              10,765      214,999 

(1)
The amount shown in column (i) reflects the 2,722,052 Holding Units Mr. Kraus was granted pursuant to the Extended Employment Agreement,as discussed above in "Overview of our Chief Executive Officer's Compensation."

(2)
Amounts shown in column (i) reflect 2012 restricted Holding Unit awards granted under the Incentive Compensation Program and the 2010 Plan, an equity compensation plan, and can also be found in column (e) of the Summary Compensation Table.

(3)
As discussed above in "Overview of 2012 Incentive Compensation Program" and "Compensation Elements for Executive Officers—Long-term Incentive Compensation," long-term incentive compensation awards generally are denominated in restricted Holding Units. We employ this structure to directly align our executives' long-term interests with the interests of our Unitholders while also indirectly aligning our executives' long-term interests with the interests of our clients, as strong performance for our clients generally contributes directly to increases in assets under management and thus improved financial performance for the firm. The 2012 long-term incentive compensation awards granted to our named executive officers are shown in column (i) of this table, column (e) of the Summary Compensation Table and column (g) of the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2012 Fiscal Year-End Table.

In 2012, the number of restricted Holding Units comprising long-term incentive compensation awards was based on the average of the closing prices of a Holding Unit as reported for NYSE composite transactions for the five business day period that commenced on January 14, 2013 and concluded on January 18, 2013 (this calculation resulted in an average price of $19.972); the Compensation Committee approved the awards on December 3, 2012.


Table of Contents

(4)
Mr. Weisenseel was granted, as of the JCW Hire Date, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Incentive Compensation Program, an award of restricted Holding Units initially valued at $1,000,000 in connection with his recruitment and as replacement equity for awards he forfeited by leaving McGraw Hill. The number of restricted Holding Units (69,629) was determined by dividing $1,000,000 by the average closing price on the NYSE of a Holding Unit for the period covering the four trading days immediately preceding the JCW Hire Date, the JCW Hire Date and the five trading days immediately following the JCW Hire Date (this calculation resulted in an average price of $14.362) and rounded up to the nearest whole number (due to this rounding, the grant date fair value of the award reflected in column (l) is $1,000,012). This award is shown in column (i) of this table, column (e) of the Summary Compensation Table and column (g) of the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2012 Fiscal Year-End Table.


Outstanding Equity Awards at 2012 Fiscal Year-End

        The following table describes any outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2012:

 
 Option Awards Holding Unit Awards 
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)
 
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) 

Peter S. Kraus(1)(2)

            3,266,462  56,934,433     

James A. Gingrich(3)(4)

  158,119  105,414    17.05  1/23/19  331,676  5,781,113     

Robert P. van Brugge(5)

            170,408  2,970,211     

Lori A. Massad(6)

            90,410  1,575,846     

John C. Weisenseel(7)

            64,486  1,123,991     

Edward J. Farrell(8)

            34,579  602,712     

(1)
Mr. Kraus's Restricted Holding Unit Grant vested in 20% increments on each of December 19, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012, and is scheduled to vest in an additional 20% increment on December 19, 2013. In connection with the Extended Employment Agreement, the Kraus Employment Agreement was amended to permit Mr. Kraus to defer until December 19, 2018 delivery of the final vesting of 544,410 restricted Holding Units.

(2)
In connection with the signing of the Extended Employment Agreement on June 21, 2012, Mr. Kraus was granted an additional 2,722,052 restricted Holding Units. Subject to the accelerated vesting clauses set forth in the Extended Employment Agreement (see"Overview of our Chief Executive Officer's Compensation"), Mr. Kraus's restricted Holding Units will vest in 20% increments on each of the first five anniversaries of December 19, 2013, commencing December 19, 2014, provided, with respect to each installment, Mr. Kraus continues to be employed by AllianceBernstein on the vesting date. Delivery of all of the restricted Holding Units will be delayed until the final vesting date on December 19, 2018, subject to acceleration upon certain qualifying events of termination of employment. This award is shown in column (g) of this table, column (e) of the Summary Compensation Table and column (i) of the Grant of Plan-Based Awards Table.

(3)
Mr. Gingrich was awarded (i) 155,968 restricted Holding Units in December 2012 that vest in 25% increments on each of December 1, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, (ii) 128,558 restricted Holding Units in December 2011, 25% of which vested on December 1, 2012, and the remainder of which is scheduled to vest in additional 25% increments on each of December 1, 2013, 2014 and 2015, (iii) 111,253 restricted Holding Units in December 2010, 25% of which vested on each of December 1, 2011 and 2012, and the remainder of which is scheduled to vest in additional 25% increments on each of December 1, 2013 and 2014, and (iii) 94,650 restricted Holding Units in December 2009, 25% of which vested on each of December 1, 2010, 2011 and 2012, and the remainder of which is scheduled to vest in an additional 25% increment on December 1, 2013.

(4)
Mr. Gingrich was granted 263,533 options to buy Holding Units in January 2009, 20% of which vested and became exercisable on each of January 23, 2010, 2011 and 2012, and the remainder of which is scheduled to vest and become exercisable in additional 20% increments on each of January 23, 2013 and 2014.

(5)
Mr. van Brugge was awarded (i) 80,574 restricted Holding Units in December 2012 that vest in 25% increments on each of December 1, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, and (ii) 62,433 restricted Holding Units in December 2011, 25% of which vested on December 1, 2012, and the remainder of which is scheduled to vest in additional 25% increments on each of December 1, 2013, 2014 and 2015. The totals in columns (g) and (h) include restricted Holding Units granted to Mr. van Brugge before he became a named executive officer.

(6)
Ms. Massad was awarded 29,792 restricted Holding Units in December 2012 that vest in 25% increments on each of December 1, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016. The totals in columns (g) and (h) include restricted Holding Units granted to Ms. Massad before she became a named executive officer.

Table of Contents

(7)
Mr. Weisenseel was awarded 12,265 restricted Holding Units in December 2012 that vest in 25% increments on each of December 1, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016. In addition, Mr. Weisenseel was granted, as of the JCW Hire Date, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Incentive Compensation Program, an award of restricted Holding Units initially valued at $1,000,000 in connection with his recruitment and as replacement equity for awards he forfeited by leaving McGraw Hill. The number of restricted Holding Units (69,629) was determined by dividing $1,000,000 by the average closing price on the NYSE of a Holding Unit for the period covering the four trading days immediately preceding the JCW Hire Date, the JCW Hire Date and the five trading days immediately following the JCW Hire Date (this calculation resulted in an average price of $14.362) and rounded up to the nearest whole number. 25% of this award vested on December 1, 2012 and the remainder of this award is scheduled to vest in additional 25% increments on each of December 1, 2013, 2014 and 2015. This award is shown in column (g) of this table, column (e) of the Summary Compensation Table and column (i) of the Grant of Plan-Based Awards Table.

(8)
Mr. Farrell was awarded (i) 10,765 restricted Holding Units in December 2012 that vest in 25% increments on each of December 1, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, and (ii) 19,133 restricted Holding Units in December 2011, 25% of which vested on December 1, 2012, and the remainder of which is scheduled to vest in additional 25% increments on each of December 1, 2013, 2014 and 2015. The totals in columns (g) and (h) include restricted Holding Units granted to Mr. Farrell before he became a named executive officer.


Option Exercises and Holding Units Vested in 2012

        The following table describes any Holding Units held by our named executive officers that vested during 2012:

Name Number of
Units
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
 Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)
 Number of
Holding
Units
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)
 Value
Realized on
Vesting
($)
 
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) 

Peter S. Kraus

      544,410  9,178,753 

James A. Gingrich

      83,615  1,469,952 

Robert P. van Brugge

      46,209  812,354 

Lori A. Massad

      31,060  546,035 

John C. Weisenseel

      17,407  306,015 

Edward J. Farrell

      12,073  212,243 


Pension Benefits for 2012

        None of our named executive officers are entitled to benefits under the Amended and Restated Retirement Plan for Employees of AllianceBernstein L.P. ("Retirement Plan"), our company pension plan. For additional information regarding the Retirement Plan, including interest rates and actuarial assumptions, seeNote 16 to our consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus.


Table of Contents


Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for 2012

        The following table describes our named executive officers' vested and unvested non-qualified deferred compensation contributions, earnings and distributions during 2012 and their non-qualified deferred compensation plan balances as of December 31, 2012:

Name Executive
Contributions in
Last FY
($)
 Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY
($)
 Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)
 Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
 Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)
 
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) 

Peter S. Kraus

           

James A. Gingrich(1)

      389,661  (460,482) 2,637,647 

Robert P. van Brugge(1)(2)(3)

      53,723  (705,685) 187,500 

Lori A. Massad(1)

      5,214  (41,933)  

John C. Weisenseel(4)

    100,050      100,050 

Edward J. Farrell(1)

      51,184  (322,322) 360,831 

(1)
For Ms. Massad and Messrs. Gingrich, van Brugge and Farrell, amounts shown reflect their respective interests from pre-2009 awards under the Incentive Compensation Program. For additional information about the Incentive Compensation Program, seeNote 17 to our consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus. For individuals (including Ms. Massad and Messrs. Gingrich, van Brugge and Farrell) with notional investments in Holding Units, amounts of quarterly distributions on such Holding Units are reflected as earnings in column (d) and, to the extent distributed to the named executive officer, as distributions in column (e) Column (f) includes the value of all notional investments as of the close of business on December 31, 2012. As of that date, Messrs. Gingrich and Farrell notionally held 12,735 Holding Units and 6,347 Holding Units, respectively, and Ms. Massad and Mr. van Brugge did not hold any Holding Units, as a result of pre-2009 awards under the Incentive Compensation Program.

(2)
The amount shown in column (d) for Mr. van Brugge reflects the interest payment to which he was entitled as a result of allocating a portion of his 2011 long-term incentive compensation award to Deferred Cash. Interest accrues monthly based on our monthly weighted average cost of funds (approximately 0.4% in December 2012) and will be credited to Mr. van Brugge annually until the cash is distributed to him in installments over the four-year vesting period.

(3)
The amount shown in column (e) for Mr. van Brugge includes his Deferred Cash distribution during 2012.

(4)
The amount shown in column (c) for Mr. Weisenseel reflects the portion of his 2012 long-term incentive compensation award that he elected to receive in Deferred Cash. This amount will accrue interest monthly based on our monthly weighed average cost of funds (approximately 0.4% during 2012) and will be credited to Mr. Weisenseel annually until the cash is distributed to him in installments over the four-year vesting period. In future years, this interest will be reflected in column (d) and these distributions will be reflected in column (e).

Table of Contents


Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

        In connection with the commencement of Mr. Kraus's employment, on December 19, 2008, he received the Restricted Holding Unit Grant. During Mr. Kraus's Employment Term, AllianceBernstein has no commitment to pay any cash bonuses to Mr. Kraus beyond the $6 million in 2009 (with any additional bonuses being entirely at the discretion of the Compensation Committee) or to make any additional equity-based awards to him. Consequently, for 2010 and subsequent years during the Employment Term, the totality of Mr. Kraus's compensation (other than his salary and absent any additional awards the Compensation Committee may choose to grant) has been, and continues to be, dependent on the level of cash distributions on the restricted Holding Units granted to him and the evolution of the trading price of Holding Units, both of which are partially dependent on the financial and operating results of our firm. Therefore, his long-term interests are directly aligned with the interests of other holders of Holding Units and also indirectly aligned with the interests of our clients as strong performance for our clients generally contributes to increases in assets under management and thus improved financial performance for the firm. For additional information about Mr. Kraus's compensation, see"Overview of our Chief Executive Officer's Compensation" above.

        The Kraus Employment Agreement contains a number of accelerated vesting clauses, including immediate vesting upon a "change in control" of our firm (i.e., AXA, our parent company, ceasing to control the management of AllianceBernstein's business or Holding ceasing to be publicly traded); immediate vesting of the next two installments of restricted Holding Units (or, if only one installment remains as of the termination date, such installment) upon certain qualifying events of termination of employment, including termination of Mr. Kraus's employment by AllianceBernstein "without cause" or by Mr. Kraus for "good reason"; and immediate vesting of a pro-rata portion of any restricted Holding Units otherwise due to vest on the next vesting date upon Mr. Kraus's death or disability.

        The change-in-control provisions in the Kraus Employment Agreement were required by Mr. Kraus as part of his negotiation in order to assure him that AllianceBernstein would continue to be operated as a separately managed entity, and with a certain degree of independence, and that Holding would continue as a publicly traded entity. Both AXA and Mr. Kraus believe that this arrangement adds significant value to AllianceBernstein. The Board understood that AXA had no intention of changing this arrangement during the Employment Term and thus concluded that the change-in-control provisions were acceptable and necessary in order to recruit Mr. Kraus.

        The provisions requiring accelerated vesting upon termination by AllianceBernstein without cause or by Mr. Kraus for good reason were required by Mr. Kraus in order to preserve the value of his long-term incentive compensation arrangement. The Board agreed to these provisions because they were typical of executive compensation agreements for executives at Mr. Kraus's level and because the Board concluded that they were necessary to recruit Mr. Kraus.

        The Board concluded that the change-in-control and termination provisions in the Kraus Employment Agreement fit into AllianceBernstein's overall compensation objectives because they permitted AllianceBernstein to attract and retain a highly qualified chief executive officer, were consistent with AXA's and the Board's expectations with respect to the manner in which AllianceBernstein and Holding would be operated from 2009 to 2013, were consistent with the Board's expectations that Mr. Kraus would not be terminated without cause and that no steps would be taken that would provide him with the ability to terminate the agreement with good reason (and thus that there was no inconsistency between these provisions and AllianceBernstein's goal of providing Mr. Kraus with effective incentives for future performance), and to align his long-term interests with those of AllianceBernstein's Unitholders and clients.

        As discussed above in "Overview of our Chief Executive Officer's Compensation," on June 21, 2012, Mr. Kraus, the General Partner, AllianceBernstein and Holding entered into the Extended Employment Agreement. The terms set forth in the Extended Employment Agreement regarding


Table of Contents

potential payments to Mr. Kraus upon a change in control of AllianceBernstein or a qualifying event of termination of employment are substantially the same as the comparable terms in the Kraus Employment Agreement, except for the terms governing a termination of employment by AllianceBernstein without "cause" or by Mr. Kraus for "good reason." If the Extended Employment Agreement had been terminated for either of these reasons before December 19, 2012, Mr. Kraus would have forfeited the entire restricted Holding Unit award granted under the Extended Employment Agreement. If the Extended Employment Agreement is terminated for either of these reasons after December 19, 2012 but before December 19, 2013, Mr. Kraus will immediately vest in the installment of restricted Holding Units scheduled to vest on December 19, 2014. If the Extended Employment Agreement is terminated for either of these reasons after December 19, 2013, Mr. Kraus will immediately vest in the next two installments of restricted Holding Units or, if fewer remain as of the termination date, the balance of the installments that are unvested.

        In 2011, we amended all outstanding long-term incentive compensation awards (including option awards) of active employees (i.e., those employees who were employed by the company as of December 31, 2011) permitting those employees who terminate their employment or are terminated without cause to continue to vest in their long-term incentive compensation awards if they comply with certain agreements and restrictive covenants set forth in the applicable award agreement. These agreements and covenants include restrictions on competition and employee and client solicitation, and a claw-back for failing to follow existing risk management policies. Our 2012 long-term incentive compensation awards incorporated these changes and we expect the changes to apply to long-term incentive compensation awards in future years as well. The amounts shown for the named executive officers (other than Mr. Kraus) for resignation or termination by AllianceBernstein without cause in columns (b), (c) and (d) of the table below reflect the value of these changes to their outstanding awards, assuming such resignation or termination on December 31, 2012 and the executives' continued compliance with these agreements and restrictive covenants through the vesting dates of the awards. For additional information, see"Overview of Compensation Philosophy and Program" and Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus. In addition, there are amounts payable to the named executive officers upon death and disability.


Table of Contents

        The following table sets forth estimated payments and benefits to which our named executive officers would have been entitled upon a change in control of AllianceBernstein or the qualifying events of termination of employment as of December 31, 2012:

Name Cash
Payments(1)(2)
($)
 Acceleration
or Grant of
Restricted Holding
Unit Awards(2)
($)
 Acceleration
of Option
Awards(2)
($)
 Other
Benefits
($)
 
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) 

Peter S. Kraus(3)

             

Change in control—Kraus Employment Agreement

    9,489,066    16,460 

Change in control—Extended Employment Agreement

    47,445,366  16,460    

Termination by AllianceBernstein without cause—Kraus Employment Agreement

    9,489,066    16,460 

Termination by AllianceBernstein without cause—Extended Employment Agreement

    9,489,066  16,460    

Termination by Mr. Kraus for good reason—Kraus Employment Agreement

    9,489,066    16,460 

Termination by Mr. Kraus for good reason—Extended Employment Agreement

    9,489,066    16,460 

Death or disability(4)(5)—Kraus Employment Agreement

    9,489,066    16,460 

Death or disability(4)(5)—Extended Employment Agreement          

    9,489,066  16,460    

James A. Gingrich

             

Resignation or termination by AllianceBernstein without cause (complies with applicable agreements and restrictive covenants)(2)

    5,781,113  40,057   

Death or disability(6)

    5,781,113  40,057   

Robert P. van Brugge

             

Resignation or termination by AllianceBernstein without cause (complies with applicable agreements and restrictive covenants)(2)

  187,500  2,970,211     

Death or disability(6)

  187,500  2,970,211     

Lori A. Massad

             

Resignation or termination by AllianceBernstein without cause (complies with applicable agreements and restrictive covenants)(2)

    1,575,846     

Death or disability(6)

    1,575,846     

John C. Weisenseel

             

Resignation or termination by AllianceBernstein without cause (complies with applicable agreements and restrictive covenants)(2)

  100,050  1,123,991     

Death or disability(6)

  100,050  1,123,991     

Table of Contents

Name Cash
Payments(1)(2)
($)
 Acceleration
or Grant of
Restricted Holding
Unit Awards(2)
($)
 Acceleration
of Option
Awards(2)
($)
 Other
Benefits
($)
 
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) 

Edward J. Farrell

             

Resignation or termination by AllianceBernstein without cause (complies with applicable agreements and restrictive covenants)(2)

    602,712     

Death or disability(6)

    602,712     

(1)
For Messrs. van Brugge and Weisenseel, amounts shown represent the portions of their awards pursuant to the Incentive Compensation Program they elected to allocate to Deferred Cash. Mr. van Brugge allocated a portion of his 2011 award to Deferred Cash and Mr. Weisenseel allocated a portion of his 2012 award to Deferred Cash. In addition, it is possible that each named executive officer (other than Mr. Kraus) could receive a cash severance payment on the termination of his or her employment. As the amounts of any such cash severance payments would be determined at the time of such termination, we are unable to estimate such amounts.

(2)
In 2011, we amended all outstanding long-term incentive compensation awards (including option awards) of active employees (i.e., those employees who were employed by the company as of December 31, 2011) permitting those employees, who terminate their employment or are terminated without cause, to continue to vest in their long-term incentive compensation awards (including option awards) if they comply with certain agreements and restrictive covenants set forth in the applicable award agreement. These agreements and covenants include restrictions on competition and employee and client solicitation, and a claw-back for failing to follow existing risk management policies. Our 2012 long-term incentive compensation awards incorporated these changes and we expect these changes also to apply to future long-term incentive compensation awards.

If a named executive officer fails to comply with the applicable agreements and restrictive covenants set forth in his or her award agreements, the named executive officer would not be entitled to continue to vest in his or her restricted Holding Unit or option awards.

(3)
If a change in control of AllianceBernstein or a qualifying event of termination of employment had occurred as of December 31, 2012, Mr. Kraus would have been entitled to receive (i) accelerated vesting under each of the Kraus Employment Agreement and the Extended Employment Agreement of all or a portion of his restricted Holding Unit awards, as shown in column (c), and (ii) only one payment of $16,460 for continuing health and welfare benefits under "Other Benefits," as shown in column (e). For additional information, please see"Overview of our Chief Executive Officer's Compensation."

(4)
Each of the Kraus Employment Agreement and the Extended Employment Agreement defines "Disability" as a good faith determination by AllianceBernstein that Mr. Kraus is physically or mentally incapacitated and has been unable for a period of 120 days in the aggregate during any twelve-month period to perform substantially all of the duties for which he is responsible immediately before the commencement of the incapacity.

(5)
Under both the Kraus Employment Agreement and the Extended Employment Agreement, upon termination of Mr. Kraus's employment due to death or disability, AllianceBernstein will provide at its expense continued health and welfare benefits for Mr. Kraus, his spouse and his dependantsdependents through the end of the calendar year in which termination occurs. Thereafter, until the date Mr. Kraus (or, in the case of his spouse, his spouse) reaches age 65, AllianceBernstein will provide

Table of Contents

(6)
"Disability" is defined in the Incentive Compensation Program award agreements of Mr. Gingrich, Mr. van Brugge, Ms. Massad, Mr. Weisenseel and Mr. Farrell, and in the Special Option Program award agreements of Mr. Gingrich, as the inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, as determined by the carrier of the long-term disability insurance program maintained by AllianceBernstein or its affiliate that covers the executive officer.


Director Compensation in 2012

        The following table describes how we compensated our non-employee directors during 2012:

Name Fees
Earned
or Paid in
Cash
($)
 Stock
Awards
(1)(3) ($)
 Option
Awards
(2)(3) ($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
 Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
 All Other
Compensation
($)
 Total
($)
 
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) 

Christopher M. Condron

  80,000  60,000  60,000        200,000 

Steven G. Elliott

  84,500  60,000  60,000        204,500 

Deborah S. Hechinger

  71,000  60,000  60,000        191,000 

Weston M. Hicks

  71,000  60,000  60,000        191,000 

Lorie A. Slutsky

  81,500  60,000  60,000        201,500 

A.W. (Pete) Smith, Jr. 

  81,500  60,000  60,000        201,500 

Peter J. Tobin

  96,500  60,000  60,000        216,500 

(1)
As of December 31, 2012, these directors had outstanding restricted Holding Unit awards in the following amounts: Mr. Condron held 6,875 Holding Units, Mr. Elliott held 6,875 Holding Units, Ms. Hechinger held 10,380 Holding Units, Mr. Hicks held 10,842 Holding Units, Ms. Slutsky held 11,503 Holding Units, Mr. Smith held 10,842 Holding Units and Mr. Tobin held 11,503 Holding Units.

(2)
As of December 31, 2012, these directors had outstanding option awards in the following amounts: Mr. Condron held options to buy 26,383 Holding Units, Mr. Elliott held options to buy 26,383 Holding Units, Ms. Hechinger held options to buy 42,510 Holding Units, Mr. Hicks held options to buy 44,938 Holding Units, Ms. Slutsky held options to buy 69,339 Holding Units, Mr. Smith held options to buy 44,938 Holding Units and Mr. Tobin held options to buy 69,339 Holding Units.

(3)
Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For the assumptions made in determining these values, see Note 18 to our consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus.

        The General Partner only pays fees, and makes equity-based awards, to directors who are not employed by our company or by any of our affiliates. Through December 31, 2012, these fees and awards consisted of:


Table of Contents

        During 2012, at a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board, 4,116 restricted Holding Units and options to buy 16,349 Holding Units at $14.58 per Holding Unit were granted to each of Mr. Condron, Mr. Elliott, Ms. Hechinger, Mr. Hicks, Ms. Slutsky, Mr. Smith and Mr. Tobin. Such grants generally have been made at the May meeting of the Board. The date of the meeting was set at a Board meeting in 2011. The exercise price of the options was the closing price on the NYSE on May 15, 2012, the date the Board approved the awards. For information about how the Black-Scholes value was calculated, seeNote 18 to our consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus. Options granted to these directors become exercisable ratably over three years. Restricted Holding Units granted to these directors "cliff" vest after three years (i.e., 100% of the award is distributed on the third anniversary of the grant date). In order to avoid any perception that our directors' exercise of their fiduciary duties might be impaired, these options and restricted Holding Units are not forfeitable. Accordingly, vesting and exercisability of options continues following a director's resignation from the Board. Restricted Holding Units vest and are distributed as soon as administratively feasible following a director's resignation from the Board.

        At a regular-scheduled meeting of the Board held on August 1, 2012, and effective with equity-based awards to be granted in May 2013, the Board adjusted the equity-based awards it makes to directors who are not employed by our company or any of our affiliates by permitting each of these directors to elect to receive his or her annual equity-based award in the form of (i) restricted Holding Units having a value of $120,000 based on the closing price of a Holding Unit on the grant date as reported for NYSE composite transactions, (ii) options to buy Holding Units with a grant date value of $120,000 calculated using the Black-Scholes method, or (iii) a combination consisting of restricted Holding Units having a value of $60,000 and options to buy Holding Units with a grant date value of $60,000. The Board also determined that this election should be made in January of each year.

        The General Partner may reimburse any director for reasonable expenses incurred in participating in Board meetings. Holding and AllianceBernstein, in turn, reimburse the General Partner for expenses incurred by the General Partner on their behalf, including amounts in respect of directors' fees and expenses. These reimbursements are subject to any relevant provisions of the Holding Partnership Agreement and the AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement.


Table of Contents


Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

        The following table summarizes the Holding Units to be issued pursuant to our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2012:


Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan Category Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
 Weighted
average
exercise price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
 Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future
issuance(1)
 
 
 (a) (b) (c) 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  8,553,345 $39.77  35,226,082 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

       
        

Total

  8,553,345 $39.77  35,226,082 
        

(1)
All Holding Units remaining available for future issuance will be issued pursuant to the 2010 Plan.

        There are no AllianceBernstein Units to be issued pursuant to an equity compensation plan.

        For information about our equity compensation plans (2010 Plan, 1997 Plan, 1993 Unit Option Plan, Century Club Plan), seeNote 18 to our consolidated financial statements contained in this proxy statement/prospectus.


Principal Security Holders

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, we had no information that any person beneficially owned more than 5% of the outstanding Holding Units.

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, we had no information that any person beneficially owned more than 5% of the outstanding AllianceBernstein Units except AXA and certain of its wholly owned subsidiaries as reported on Schedules 13D/A and Forms 4 filed with the SEC on December 16, 2011September 23, 2013 pursuant to the Exchange Act.

        The table below and the notes following it have been prepared in reliance upon such filings for the nature of ownership and an explanation of overlapping ownership.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
 Amount and Nature of Beneficial
Ownership Reported on Schedule
 Percent of Class  Amount and Nature of Beneficial
Ownership Reported on Schedule
 Percent of Class 

AXA(1)(2)(3)(4)
25 avenue Matignon 75008
Paris, France

 170,121,745(4)(5) 61.1%(4)(5) 170,121,745(4)(5) 64.3%(4)(5)

(1)
Based on information provided by AXA Financial, on JuneSeptember 30, 2013, AXA and certain of its subsidiaries beneficially owned all of AXA Financial's outstanding common stock. For insurance regulatory purposes, the shares of common stock of AXA Financial beneficially owned by AXA and its subsidiaries have been deposited into a voting trust ("Voting Trust"), the term of which has been extended until April 29, 2021. The trustees of the Voting Trust ("Voting Trustees") are Henri de Castries, Denis Duverne and Mark Pearson. Messrs. de Castries and Duverne serve on the Board of Directors of AXA, while Mr. Pearson serves on the Management Committee of AXA.

Table of Contents

(2)
Based on information provided by AXA, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, 14.33% of the issued ordinary shares (representing 23.21%23.27% of the voting power) of AXA were owned directly by two French mutual insurance companies (AXA Assurances IARD Mutuelle and AXA Assurances Vie Mutuelle) engaged in the Property & Casualty insurance business and the Life & Savings insurance business in France ("Mutuelles AXA").

(3)
The Voting Trustees and the Mutuelles AXA, as a group, may be deemed to be beneficial owners of all AllianceBernstein Units beneficially owned by AXA and its subsidiaries. By virtue of the provisions of the Voting Trust Agreement, AXA may be deemed to have shared voting power with respect to the AllianceBernstein Units. AXA and its subsidiaries have the power to dispose or direct the disposition of all shares of the capital stock of AXA Financial deposited in the Voting Trust. The Mutuelles AXA, as a group, may be deemed to share the power to vote or to direct the vote and to dispose or to direct the disposition of all the AllianceBernstein Units beneficially owned by AXA and its subsidiaries. The address of each of AXA and the Voting Trustees is 25 avenue Matignon, 75008 Paris, France. The address of the Mutuelles AXA is 313 Terrasses de l'Arche, 92727 Nanterre Cedex, France.

(4)
By reason of their relationships, AXA, the Voting Trustees, the Mutuelles AXA, AXA America Holdings, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of AXA), AXA IM Rose Inc. (a 95.82%-owned subsidiary of AXA), AXA Financial, AXA Equitable, AXA Re Arizona Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of AXA Financial), Coliseum Reinsurance Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of AXA Financial), ACMC, LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of AXA Financial), MONY and MLOA may be deemed to share the power to vote or to direct the vote and to dispose or direct the disposition of all or a portion of the 170,121,745 issued and outstanding AllianceBernstein Units.

(5)
As indicated above in note 4, AXA owns approximately 95.82% of AXA IM Rose Inc., which means that approximately 4.18% of the AllianceBernstein Units beneficially owned by AXA IM Rose Inc. as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 were not beneficially owned by AXA. As a result, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, AXA beneficially owned 168,368,879 AllianceBernstein Units, or 60.5%63.7% of the issued and outstanding AllianceBernstein Units.

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, Holding was the record owner of 105,952,081,92,066,984, or 38.1%34.8%, of the issued and outstanding AllianceBernstein Units.


Table of Contents


Management

        The following table sets forth, as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, the beneficial ownership of Holding Units by each director and named executive officer of the General Partner and by all directors and executive officers as a group:

Name of Beneficial Owner
 Number of Holding
Units and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
 Percent of
Class
  Number of Holding
Units and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
 Percent of
Class
 

Peter S. Kraus(1)(2)

 4,337,643 4.1% 4,337,643 4.1%

Christopher M. Condron(3)

 66,282 *  66,282 * 

Henri de Castries(1)

 2,000 *  2,000 * 

Denis Duverne(1)

 2,000 *  2,000 * 

Steven G. Elliott(4)

 23,551 * �� 23,551 * 

Deborah S. Hechinger(5)

 38,644 *  38,644 * 

Weston M. Hicks(6)

 51,073 *  51,073 * 

Andrew J. McMahon(1)

  * 

Mark Pearson(1)

  *   * 

Scott A. Schoen

 52,485 * 

Lorie A. Slutsky(1)(7)

 58,811 *  58,811 * 

A.W. (Pete) Smith, Jr.(8)

 47,592 *  46,592 * 

Peter J. Tobin(9)

 61,135 *  61,135 * 

Joshua A. Weinreich

 1,243 * 

James A. Gingrich(1)(10)

 717,501 *  717,501 * 

Lori A. Massad(1)(11)

 131,231 *  131,231 * 

Robert P. van Brugge(1)(12)

 170,408 *  170,408 * 

John C. Weisenseel(1)(13)

 75,614 *  75,614 * 

Edward J. Farrell(1)(14)

 55,476 *  55,476 * 

All directors and executive officers of the General Partner as a group (18 persons)(15)(16)

 6,059,173 5.7%

All directors and executive officers of the General Partner as a group (19 persons)(15)(16)

 6,111,901 6.6%

*
Number of Holding Units listed represents less than 1% of the Units outstanding.

(1)
Excludes Holding Units beneficially owned by AXA and its subsidiaries. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, Ms. Slutsky and Messrs. Kraus, de Castries, Duverne, McMahon and Pearson were directors and/or officers of AXA, AXA IM, AXA Financial, and/or AXA Equitable. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, Ms. Massad and Messrs. Kraus, Gingrich, van Brugge, Weisenseel and Farrell were directors and/or officers of the General Partner.

(2)
In connection with the commencement of Mr. Kraus's employment, on December 19, 2008, he was granted 2,722,052 restricted Holding Units. Subject to accelerated vesting clauses in the Kraus Employment Agreement (e.g., immediate vesting upon AXA ceasing to control the management of AllianceBernstein's business or Holding ceasing to be publicly traded), Mr. Kraus's restricted Holding Units vest ratably on each of the first five anniversaries of December 19, 2008, which commenced December 19, 2009, provided, with respect to each installment, Mr. Kraus continues to be employed by AllianceBernstein on the vesting date. AllianceBernstein withheld 280,263 Holding Units, 277,487 Holding Units, 274,764 Holding Units and 273,947 Holding Units, respectively, from Mr. Kraus's distributions when the 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 tranches of his Restricted Holding Unit Grant vested to cover withholding tax obligations. Mr. Kraus's total reflected in the table includes 544,410 Holding Units awarded under the Kraus Employment Agreement and 2,722,052 Holding Units under the Extended Employment Agreement that have not yet vested or been distributed to him.

Table of Contents

(3)
Includes 12,137 Holding Units Mr. Condron can acquire within 60 days under an AllianceBernstein option plan.

(4)
Includes 12,137 Holding Units Mr. Elliott can acquire within 60 days under an AllianceBernstein option plan.

(5)
Includes 28,264 Holding Units Ms. Hechinger can acquire within 60 days under an AllianceBernstein option plan.

(6)
Includes 30,692 Holding Units Mr. Hicks can acquire within 60 days under an AllianceBernstein option plan.

(7)
Includes 41,981 Holding Units Ms. Slutsky can acquire within 60 days under an AllianceBernstein option plan.

(8)
Includes 30,692 Holding Units Mr. Smith can acquire within 60days under an AllianceBernstein option plan.

(9)
Includes 45,093 Holding Units Mr. Tobin can acquire within 60 days under an AllianceBernstein option plan.

(10)
Includes 210,826 Holding Units Mr. Gingrich can acquire within 60 days under an AllianceBernstein option plan and 409,243 restricted Holding Units awarded to Mr. Gingrich as long-term incentive compensation that have not yet vested or been distributed to him. These restricted Holding Units include 155,968 restricted Holding Units granted to Mr. Gingrich as 2012 long-term incentive compensation. This award was approved by the Compensation Committee at a meeting duly called and held on December 3, 2012, at which meeting the Compensation Committee determined that the number of Holding Units would be derived using the average of the closing prices ($19.972) of a Holding Unit as reported for NYSE composite transactions for the five business day period that commenced on January 14, 2013 and concluded on January 18, 2013.

(11)
Includes 90,410 restricted Holding Units awarded to Ms. Massad as long-term incentive compensation that have not yet vested or been distributed to her. These restricted Holding Units include 29,792 restricted Holding Units granted to Ms. Massad as 2012 long-term incentive compensation. This award was approved by the Compensation Committee at a meeting duly called and held on December 3, 2012, at which meeting the Compensation Committee determined that the number of Holding Units would be derived using the average of the closing prices ($19.972) of a Holding Unit as reported for NYSE composite transactions for the five business day period that commenced on January 14, 2013 and concluded on January 18, 2013.

(12)
Represents 170,408 restricted Holding Units awarded to Mr. van Brugge as long-term incentive compensation that have not yet vested or been distributed to him. These restricted Holding Units include 80,574 restricted Holding Units granted to Mr. van Brugge as 2012 long-term incentive compensation. This award was approved by the Compensation Committee at a meeting duly called and held on December 3, 2012, at which meeting the Compensation Committee determined that the number of Holding Units would be derived using the average of the closing prices ($19.972) of a Holding Unit as reported for NYSE composite transactions for the five business day period that commenced on January 14, 2013 and concluded on January 18, 2013.

(13)
Includes 64,486 restricted Holding Units awarded to Mr. Weisenseel as long-term incentive compensation that have not vested or been distributed to him. These restricted Holding Units include 12,265 restricted Holding Units granted to Mr. Weisenseel as 2012

Table of Contents

(14)
Includes 42,611 restricted Holding Units awarded to Mr. Farrell as long-term incentive compensation that have not yet vested or been distributed to him. These restricted Holding Units include 10,765 restricted Holding Units granted to him as 2012 long-term incentive compensation. This award was approved by the Compensation Committee at a meeting duly called and held on December 3, 2012, at which meeting the Compensation Committee determined that the number of Holding Units would be derived using the average of the closing prices ($19.972) of a Holding Unit as reported for NYSE composite transactions for the five business day period that commenced on January 14, 2013 and concluded on January 18, 2013.

(15)
Includes 474,500 Holding Units the directors and executive officers as a group can acquire within 60 days under AllianceBernstein option plans.

(16)
Includes 4,194,819 restricted Holding Units awarded to the executive officers as a group as long-term incentive compensation that have not yet vested or been distributed to them.

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, our directors and executive officers did not beneficially own any AllianceBernstein Units.


Table of Contents

        The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2012, the beneficial ownership of the common stock of AXA by each director and named executive officer of the General Partner and by all directors and executive officers as a group:


AXA Common Stock(1)

Name of Beneficial Owner
 Number of Shares
and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
 Percent
of Class
 

Peter S. Kraus

    * 

Christopher M. Condron(2)

  3,407,930  * 

Henri de Castries(3)

  4,458,696  * 

Denis Duverne(4)

  2,565,402  * 

Steven G. Elliott

    * 

Deborah S. Hechinger

    * 

Weston M. Hicks

    * 

Andrew J. McMahon(5)

239,105*

Kevin Molloy(6)

63,094*

Mark Pearson(7)Pearson(5)

  131,108  * 

Scott A. Schoen

*

Lorie A. Slutsky(8)Slutsky(6)

  25,625  * 

A.W. (Pete) Smith, Jr. 

    * 

Peter J. Tobin(9)Tobin(7)

  37,548*

Joshua A. Weinreich

  * 

James A. Gingrich

    * 

Lori A. Massad

    * 

Robert P. van Brugge

    * 

John C. Weisenseel

    * 

Edward J. Farrell

    * 

All directors and executive officers of the General Partner as a group (19 persons)(10)(8)

  10,928,50810,626,309  * 

*
Number of shares listed represents less than 1% of the outstanding AXA common stock.

(1)
Holdings of AXA American Depositary Shares ("ADS") are expressed as their equivalent in AXA common stock. Each AXA ADS represents the right to receive one AXA ordinary share.

(2)
Includes 2,396,076 shares Mr. Condron can acquire within 60 days under option plans and 434,140 AXA ADSs Mr. Condron can acquire within 60 days under option plans. Also includes (i) 349,365 deferred restricted ADS units under AXA's Variable Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives, and (ii) 43,120 earned and unpaid AXA performance units, which he can elect to receive in the form of ADS or cash.

(3)
Includes 2,950,340 shares Mr. de Castries can acquire within 60 days under option plans. Also includes 231,000 unvested AXA performance shares, which are paid out when vested based on the price of AXA at that time and are subject to achievement of internal performance conditions.

(4)
Includes 1,889,169 shares Mr. Duverne can acquire within 60 days under option plans.

(5)
Includes 195,092 shares Mr. McMahon can acquire within 60 days under option plans. Also includes (i) 4,165 restricted AXA shares, representing the 30% payout of AXA performance units awarded to Mr. McMahon in 2009 (restriction will lift on March 20, 2013), (ii) 15,883 restricted shares that will vest on May 20, 2015, and (iii) 11,375 earned

Table of Contents

(6)
Includes 16,744 shares Mr. Molloy can acquire within 60 days under options plans and 7,036 ADSs Mr. Molloy can acquire within 60 days under option plans. Also includes (i) 914 restricted AXA shares, representing the 30% payout of AXA performance units awarded to Mr. Molloy in 2009 (restriction will lift on March 20, 2013), and (ii) 2,120 earned and unpaid AXA performance units, which he can elect to receive in the form of ADS or cash.

(7)
Includes 84,399 shares Mr. Pearson can acquire within 60 days under options plans. Also includes (i) 4,719 restricted AXA shares, representing the 30% payout of AXA performance units awarded to Mr. Pearson in 2009, and (ii) 8,721 earned and unpaid AXA performance units, which he can elect to receive in the form of ADS or cash.


Table of Contents

(8)(6)
Includes 4,735 shares Ms. Slutsky can acquire within 60 days under option plans.

(9)(7)
Includes 9,346 shares Mr. Tobin can acquire within 60 days under option plans.

(10)(8)
Includes 7,545,901 shares the directors and executive officers as a group can acquire within 60 days under option plans and 441,176 ADS the directors and executive officers as a group can acquire within 60 days under option plans.


Partnership Matters

        The General Partner makes all decisions relating to the management of AllianceBernstein and Holding. The General Partner has agreed that it will conduct no business other than managing AllianceBernstein and Holding, although it may make certain investments for its own account. Conflicts of interest, however, could arise between AllianceBernstein and Holding, the General Partner and the Unitholders of both Partnerships.

        Section 17-403(b) of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act ("Delaware Act") states in substance that, except as provided in the Delaware Act or the applicable partnership agreement, a general partner of a limited partnership has the liabilities of a general partner in a general partnership governed by the Delaware Uniform Partnership Law (as in effect on July 11, 1999) to the partnership and to the other partners. Accordingly, while under Delaware law a general partner of a limited partnership is liable as a fiduciary to the other partners, those fiduciary obligations may be altered by the terms of the applicable partnership agreement. The AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement and Holding Partnership Agreement both set forth limitations on the duties and liabilities of the General Partner. Each partnership agreement provides that the General Partner is not liable for monetary damages for errors in judgment or for breach of fiduciary duty (including breach of any duty of care or loyalty) unless it is established (the person asserting such liability having the burden of proof) that the General Partner's action or failure to act involved an act or omission undertaken with deliberate intent to cause injury, with reckless disregard for the best interests of the Partnerships or with actual bad faith on the part of the General Partner, or constituted actual fraud. Whenever the AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement and the Holding Partnership Agreement provide that the General Partner is permitted or required to make a decision (i) in its "discretion" or under a grant of similar authority or latitude, the General Partner is entitled to consider only such interests and factors as it desires and has no duty or obligation to consider any interest of or other factors affecting the Partnerships or any Unitholder of AllianceBernstein or Holding or (ii) in its "good faith" or under another express standard, the General Partner will act under that express standard and will not be subject to any other or different standard imposed by the AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement and the Holding Partnership Agreement or applicable law or in equity or otherwise. The partnership agreements further provide that to the extent that, at law or in equity, the General Partner has duties


Table of Contents

(including (including fiduciary duties) and liabilities relating thereto to either Partnership or any partner, the General Partner acting under the AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement or the Holding Partnership Agreement, as applicable, will not be liable to the Partnerships or any partner for its good faith reliance on the provisions of the partnership agreement.

        In addition, the AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement and the Holding Partnership Agreement grant broad rights of indemnification to the General Partner and its directors and affiliates and authorize AllianceBernstein and Holding to enter into indemnification agreements with the directors, officers, partners, employees and agents of AllianceBernstein and its affiliates and Holding and its affiliates. The Partnerships have granted broad rights of indemnification to officers and employees of AllianceBernstein and Holding. The foregoing indemnification provisions are not exclusive, and the Partnerships are authorized to enter into additional indemnification arrangements. AllianceBernstein and Holding have obtained directors and officers/errors and omissions liability insurance.


Table of Contents

        The AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement and the Holding Partnership Agreement also allow transactions between AllianceBernstein and Holding and the General Partner or its affiliates if the transactions are on terms determined by the General Partner to be comparable to (or more favorable to AllianceBernstein or Holding than) those that would prevail with an unaffiliated party. The partnership agreements provide that those transactions are deemed to meet that standard if such transactions are approved by a majority of those directors of the General Partner who are not directors, officers or employees of any affiliate of the General Partner (other than AllianceBernstein and its subsidiaries or Holding) or, if in the reasonable and good faith judgment of the General Partner, the transactions are on terms substantially comparable to (or more favorable to AllianceBernstein or Holding than) those that would prevail in a transaction with an unaffiliated party. The Delaware courts have held that provisions in partnership or limited liability company agreements that permit affiliate transactions so long as they are on an arms-length basis operate to establish a contractually-agreed-to fiduciary duty standard of entire fairness on the part of the general partner or manager in connection with the approval of affiliate transactions.

        The AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement and the Holding Partnership Agreement expressly permit all affiliates of the General Partner (including AXA Equitable and its other subsidiaries) to compete, directly or indirectly, with AllianceBernstein and Holding, to engage in any business or other activity and to exploit any opportunity, including those that may be available to AllianceBernstein and Holding. AXA, AXA Financial, AXA Equitable and certain of their subsidiaries currently compete with AllianceBernstein. The partnership agreements further provide that, except to the extent that a decision or action by the General Partner is taken with the specific intent of providing an improper benefit to an affiliate of the General Partner to the detriment of AllianceBernstein or Holding, there is no liability or obligation with respect to, and no challenge of, decisions or actions of the General Partner that would otherwise be subject to claims or other challenges as improperly benefiting affiliates of the General Partner to the detriment of the Partnerships or otherwise involving any conflict of interest or breach of a duty of loyalty or similar fiduciary obligation.

        Section 17-1101(c) of the Delaware Act provides that it is the policy of the Delaware Act to give maximum effect to the principle of freedom of contract and to the enforceability of partnership agreements. Further, Section 17-1101(d) of the Delaware Act provides in part that to the extent that, at law or in equity, a partner has duties (including fiduciary duties) to a limited partnership or to another partner, those duties may be expanded, restricted, or eliminated by provisions in a partnership agreement (provided that a partnership agreement may not eliminate the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing). In addition, Section 17-1101(f) of the Delaware Act provides that a partnership agreement may limit or eliminate any or all liability of a partner to a limited partnership or another partner for breach of contract or breach of duties (including fiduciary duties); provided, however, that a partnership agreement may not limit or eliminate liability for any act or omission that constitutes a bad faith violation of the implied contractual covenant of good faith and fair dealing.


Table of Contents

Decisions of the Delaware courts have recognized the right of parties, under the above provisions of the Delaware Act, to alter by the terms of a partnership agreement otherwise applicable fiduciary duties and liability for breach of duties. However, the Delaware courts have required that a partnership agreement make clear the intent of the parties to displace otherwise applicable fiduciary duties (the otherwise applicable fiduciary duties often being referred to as "default" fiduciary duties). Judicial inquiry into whether a partnership agreement is sufficiently clear to displace default fiduciary duties is necessarily fact driven and is made on a case by case basis. Accordingly, the effectiveness of displacing default fiduciary obligations and liabilities of general partners continues to be a developing area of the law and it is not certain to what extent the foregoing provisions of the AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement and the Holding Partnership Agreement are enforceable under Delaware law.


Table of Contents


Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Policies and Procedures Regarding Transactions with Related Persons

        Each of the Holding Partnership Agreement and the AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement expressly permits AXA and its affiliates, which includes AXA Equitable and its affiliates (collectively, "AXA Affiliates"), to provide services to AllianceBernstein and Holding if the terms of the transaction are approved by the General Partner in good faith as being comparable to (or more favorable to each such partnership than) those that would prevail in a transaction with an unaffiliated party. This requirement is conclusively presumed to be satisfied as to any transaction or arrangement that (i) in the reasonable and good faith judgment of the General Partner, meets that unaffiliated party standard, or (ii) has been approved by a majority of those directors of the General Partner who are not also directors, officers or employees of an affiliate of the General Partner.

        In practice, our management pricing committees review investment advisory agreements with AXA Affiliates, which is the manner in which the General Partner reaches a judgment regarding the appropriateness of the fees. Other transactions with AXA Affiliates are submitted to the Audit Committee for their review and approval; in 2012, the unanimous consent of the Audit Committee constituted the consent of four of six independent directors on the Board. We are not aware of any transaction during 2012 between our company and any related person with respect to which these procedures were not followed.

        We do not have written policies regarding the employment of immediate family members of any of our related persons. Compensation and benefits for all of our employees is established in accordance with our employment and compensation practices applicable to employees with equivalent qualifications and responsibilities who hold similar positions.


Financial Arrangements with AXA Affiliates

        The General Partner has, in its reasonable and good faith judgment (based on its knowledge of, and inquiry with respect to, comparable arrangements with or between unaffiliated parties), approved the following arrangements with AXA Equitable and its affiliates as being comparable to, or more favorable to AllianceBernstein than, those that would prevail in a transaction with an unaffiliated party.


Table of Contents

        The following tables summarize transactions between AllianceBernstein and related persons during 2012. The first table summarizes services we provide to related persons and the second table summarizes services our related persons provide to us:

Parties(1)
 General Description of Relationship(2) Amounts Received
or Accrued for
in 2012

AXA Equitable(3)

 We provide investment management services and ancillary accounting, valuation, reporting, treasury and other services to the general and separate accounts of AXA Equitable and its insurance company subsidiaries. $38,517,000
(of which
$449,000 relates
to the ancillary
services)

AXA Life Japan Limited(3)

   $24,037,000

EQAT, AXA Enterprise Trust and AXA Premier VIP Trust

 We serve as sub-adviser to these open-end mutual funds, each of which is sponsored by a subsidiary of AXA Financial. $22,021,000

MONY Life Insurance Company and its subsidiaries(3)(4)

 We provide investment management services and ancillary accounting services. $8,756,000
(of which
$150,000
relates to the
ancillary
services)

AXA Re Arizona Company(3)

   $7,248,000

AXA U.K. Group Pension Scheme

   $2,917,000

AXA Rosenberg Investment Management Asia Pacific(3)

   $2,701,000

AXA France(3)

   $2,234,000

AXA Germany(3)

   $1,706,000

AXA Corporate Solutions(3)

   $1,054,000

AXA Investment Managers Ltd. Paris(3)

   $944,000

AXA AB Funds

   $732,000

AXA China Region(3)

   $714,000

AXA Belgium(3)

   $690,000

AXA Liability Managers(3)

   $348,000

AXA Mediterranean(3)

   $325,000

AXA (Canada)(3)

   $203,000

AXA Foundation, Inc., a subsidiary of AXA Financial(3)

   $136,000

AXA General Insurance Hong Kong Ltd.(3)

   $123,000

(1)
AllianceBernstein or one of its subsidiaries is a party to each transaction.

(2)
We provide investment management services unless otherwise indicated.

(3)
This entity is a subsidiary of AXA. AXA is an indirect parent of AllianceBernstein.

(4)
Subsidiaries include MONY Life Insurance Company of America and U.S. Financial Life Insurance Company.

Table of Contents

Parties(1)(2)
 General Description of Relationship Amounts Paid
or Accrued
for in 2012
 

AXA Advisors

 AXA Advisors distributes certain of our Retail Products and provides Private Client referrals. $7,924,000 

AXA Business Services Pvt. Ltd. 

 AXA Business Services provides data processing services and support for certain investment operations functions. $7,623,000 

AXA Equitable

 We are covered by various insurance policies maintained by AXA Equitable. $4,973,000 

AXA Technology Services India Pvt. Ltd. 

 AXA Technology Services India Pvt. Ltd. provides certain data processing services and functions. $3,991,000 

AXA Group Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 

 AXA Group Solution Pvt. Ltd. provides maintenance and development support for applications. $2,287,000 

AXA Advisors

 AXA Advisors sells shares of our mutual funds under Distribution Services and Educational Support agreements. $1,430,000 

GIE Informatique AXA ("GIE")

 GIE provides cooperative technology development and procurement services to us and to various other subsidiaries of AXA. $905,000 

AXA Equitable

 AXA Equitable allows us use of their healthcare facility. $120,000 

(1)
AllianceBernstein is a party to each transaction.

(2)
Each entity is a subsidiary of AXA. AXA is an indirect parent of AllianceBernstein.


Additional Transactions with Related Persons

        Certain subsidiaries of AXA, including AXA Advisors, have entered into selected dealer agreements with AllianceBernstein Investments, for which we paid these subsidiaries of AXA sales concessions on sales of approximately $1.7 billion. Various subsidiaries of AXA distribute certain of our Non-U.S. Funds, for which such entities received aggregate distribution payments of approximately $36,000 in 2012.

        AXA Equitable and its affiliates are not obligated to provide funds to us, except for ACMC, LLC's and the General Partner's obligation to fund certain of our incentive compensation and employee benefit plan obligations. ACMC, LLC and the General Partner are obligated, subject to certain limitations, to make capital contributions to AllianceBernstein in an amount equal to the payments AllianceBernstein is required to make as incentive compensation under the employment agreements entered into in connection with AXA Equitable's 1985 acquisition of Donaldson, Lufkin and Jenrette Securities Corporation (since November 2000, a part of Credit Suisse Group) as well as obligations of AllianceBernstein to various employees and their beneficiaries under AllianceBernstein's Capital Accumulation Plan. In 2012, ACMC, LLC made capital contributions to AllianceBernstein in the amount of approximately $4.4 million in respect of these obligations. ACMC, LLC's obligations to make these contributions are guaranteed by Equitable Holdings, LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of AXA Equitable), subject to certain limitations. All tax deductions with respect to these obligations, to the extent funded by ACMC, LLC, the General Partner or Equitable Holdings, LLC, will be allocated to ACMC, LLC or the General Partner.


Table of Contents


Arrangements with Immediate Family Members of Related Persons

        During 2012, we did not have arrangements with immediate family members of our directors and executive officers.


Director Independence

        See "Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Independence of Certain Directors."


Table of Contents


PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

        The following table presents fees for professional audit services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC") for the audit of AllianceBernstein's and Holding's annual financial statements for 2012 and 2011, respectively, and fees for other services rendered by PwC ($ in thousands):

 
 2012 2011 

Audit fees(1)

 $5,102 $4,869 

Audit related fees(2)

  3,330  2,825 

Tax fees(3)

  1,806  2,494 

All other fees(4)

  6  5 
      

Total

 $10,244 $10,193 
      

(1)
Includes $64,914 paid for audit services to Holding in each of 2012 and 2011.

(2)
Audit related fees consist principally of fees for audits of financial statements of certain employee benefit plans, internal control reviews and accounting consultation.

(3)
Tax fees consist of fees for tax consultation and tax compliance services.

(4)
All other fees in 2012 and 2011 consisted of miscellaneous non-audit services.

        On November 9, 2005, the Audit Committee adopted a policy to pre-approve audit and non-audit service engagements with the independent registered public accounting firm. This policy was revised on August 3, 2006. The independent registered public accounting firm must provide annually a comprehensive and detailed schedule of each proposed audit and non-audit service to be performed. The Audit Committee then affirmatively indicates its approval of the listed engagements. Engagements that are not listed, but that are of similar scope and size to those listed and approved, may be deemed to be approved, if the fee for such service is less than $100,000. In addition, the Audit Committee has delegated to its chairman the ability to approve any permissible non-audit engagement where the fees are expected to be less than $100,000.


AllianceBernstein 2013 Merger Company, Inc.

        AllianceBernstein 2013 Merger Company, Inc., or Merger Sub, is a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein organized in August 2013 in connection with the execution of the merger agreement. Merger Sub was formed solely to facilitate the merger. The location of its principal executive offices and its telephone number are the same as those of AllianceBernstein.


W.P. STEWART & CO., LTD.

Business

        The Stewart Group, which includes W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd. and its subsidiaries and predecessors (together, "W.P. Stewart"), is an asset management group that has provided research-intensive equity investment management services to clients throughout the world since 1975. Headquartered in New York City with additional operations or affiliates in Europe, Asia and the Netherlands Antilles, W.P. Stewart managed approximately $1.6 billion in assets as of December 31, 2012 and approximately $2.0 billion at September 30, 2013. W.P. Stewart provides investment advisory services to clients including high net worth individuals, institutional investors and certain pooled investment funds. Its


Table of Contents

client base is geographically diverse, with 44% of its assets under management from non-U.S. clients as of June 30, 2013.

        W.P. Stewart's investment management approach is to seek above-average long-term investment returns, while accepting what it believes to be below-average risk. It invests the capital entrusted to it in what its investment team believes are some of the world's finest growing businesses—large enterprises that are leaders in their respective fields and that operate businesses with relatively predictable growth. W.P. Stewart focuses on a five-year investment horizon and does not engage in market timing. Historically, W.P. Stewart has focused on investing primarily in U.S. equity securities. While W.P. Stewart retains its focus on U.S. equities as its "flagship" investment offering, its team of experienced analysts (including those at its subsidiary, Bowen Asia Limited) also applies the firm's singular investment approach to the management of international, global and Asian equity portfolios. W.P. Stewart's international strategy uses the same investment approach as the U.S. equity strategy but invests in European and/or Asian equities. The global investment strategy takes the best investment ideas from the U.S., European and Asian universes to create a concentrated global portfolio of 25-30 stocks. W.P. Stewart additionally provides fixed income portfolio management for clients with equity accounts through third party sub-advisors.

        W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd.'s shares are currently traded on the Pink Sheets under the symbol "WPSL." The principal offices of W.P. Stewart are located at 527 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022, and its telephone number is (212) 750-8585. The company's website is http://www.wpstewart.com.

        W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd., a Delaware corporation incorporated on April 1, 2010 is a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. As a result of a share exchange transaction effected by a scheme of arrangement, on May 28, 2010, W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd. reorganized from an exempted company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of Bermuda to a Delaware corporation. Prior to this corporate reorganization, W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd. was a Bermuda exempt company incorporated on June 29, 1998. Effective as of July 1, 1998, its U.S. predecessor company, which had been operating since 1975, merged into W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd. with W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd. continuing as the surviving company.

        W.P. Stewart also includes the following investment advisers:


Table of Contents

        The organizational chart set forth below shows W.P. Stewart's current operating structure, its principal operating subsidiaries and their locations. W.P. Stewart believes this operating structure positions it effectively to service its global clientele and pursue its global strategy.

GRAPHIC

        W.P. Stewart is a high quality growth stock investment manager. W.P. Stewart creates concentrated portfolios of companies it believes have predictable and sustainable earnings growth. The main factors in its investment approach are quality bias, five year perspective, valuation overlay, in-depth research and team approach, each described more fully below.

        * Quality bias—means companies with volume growth drivers, low cyclicality, strong management teams, conservative accounting, strong financials, substantial moats and generally industry leading market positions

        * Five year perspective—W.P. Stewart prepares detailed five year projections for each company it actively follows to confirm sustainability of growth

        * Valuation overlay—a company's relative attractiveness and portfolio weighting are a function of five year earnings forecasts and expected P/E discounted to today

        * In-depth research—on average, analysts follow eight companies to ensure comprehensive coverage

        * Team approach—W.P. Stewart attends company meetings with multiple team members to more completely understand each investment it evaluates, allowing meaningful input to security selection by a well-informed, knowledgeable, diverse investment team.


Table of Contents

        W.P. Stewart's investment approach has realized a compound annualized return for its U.S. Concentrated Growth Composite (the "U.S. Composite"), gross, of 17.4% and 16.2%, net, on funds under discretionary management from January 1, 1975 through September 30, 2013, as compared with a return of 11.9% for the S&P 500 over the same period. Its compound annualized U.S. Composite returns for the three and five years ended September 30, 2013, gross, were 19.5% and 12.8%, respectively, as compared to 16.3% and 10.0%, respectively, for the S&P 500 during the same periods. Its compound annualized U.S. Composite returns for the three and five years ended July 31, 2013,September 30, net, were 18.1% and 11.5%, respectively. Its return for 2013 through September 30, gross, was 24.5%24.6% as compared to a return of 19.8% for the S&P 500 during the same period. Its return for 2013 through September 30, net, was 23.1%.

        W.P. Stewart's Global Growth Composite (the "Global Composite") realized a compound annualized return, gross, of 8.8% and 7.8%, net, on funds under discretionary management from January 1, 2004 (the Global Composite inception date) through September 30, 2013, as compared with a return of 5.3%6.3% for the MSCI World Index over the same period. W.P. Stewart's compound annualized Global Composite returns for the three and five years ended September 30, 2013, gross, were 12.2% and 10.9%, respectively, as compared to 11.8% and 7.8%, respectively, for the MSCI World Index during the same periods. W.P. Stewart's compound annualized Global Composite returns for the three and five years ended September 30, 2013, net, were 11.2% and 9.9%, respectively. W.P. Stewart's return for 2013 through September 30, gross, was 12.9% as compared to a return of 17.3% for the MSCI World Index during the same period. Its return for 2013 through July 31, net, was 12.1%.

        W.P. Stewart's EAFE Growth Composite (the "EAFE Composite") realized a compound annualized return, gross, of 2.1% and 1.0%, net, on funds under discretionary management from December 1, 2006 (the EAFE Composite inception date) through September 30, 2013, as compared with a return of 1.5% for the MSCI EAFE Index over the same period. W.P. Stewart's compound annualized EAFE Composite returns for the three and five years ended September 30, 2013, gross, were 4.3% and 7.6%, respectively, as compared to 8.5% and 6.4%, respectively, for the MSCI EAFE Index during the same periods. Its compound annualized EAFE Composite returns for the three and five years ended September 30, 2013, net, were 3.0% and 6.3%, respectively. Its return 2013 through September 30, gross, was 8.2% as compared to a return of 16.1% for the MSCI EAFE Index during the same period. Its return for 2013 through September 30, net, was 7.2%.

        During the 38-year period from January 1, 1975 through July 31,September 30, 2013, W.P. Stewart experienced a 17.4% compound annual return, gross, and a 16.2% compound annual return, net, for W.P. Stewart's U.S. portfolios compared to a 11.9% return for the S&P 500 Index for the same period. The firm has preserved and increased the wealth entrusted to it by its clients for more than three decades, outperforming the broader market during 27 out of 28 ten-year periods.

        W.P. Stewart's research and valuation technique drives its investment process. The firm does its own research on every company it selects, developing its investment research information from a variety of internal and external sources. Each analyst focuses on a small number of companies, on average eight, enabling them to fully research and know all aspects of the businesses they cover. The firm's management professionals visit these companies regularly; contact managements frequently; talk to competitors, customers and suppliers; and consult with independent industry experts, forensic accountants, and legal and patent specialists, as appropriate. While one analyst has the primary responsibility for each company, information is gathered by other analysts and is shared, analyzed and debated by all investment professionals.


Table of Contents

        In keeping with its long-term approach, W.P. Stewart prepares detailed five-year projections for all investment prospects. These forecasts, and the related appraisal of fair current value for each company under review, are used to determine the intrinsic value of that company and are a critical tool in developing a comprehensive and detailed evaluation of a company's business. This appraisal technique systematically examines all relevant factors, such as the quality of assets, consistency of earnings growth, ability to finance growth, strength of product line and competitive position, capability of management, pricing power, and many others. These five year forecasts for companies under review are refined frequently as investment professionals conduct their ongoing research. W.P. Stewart also follows selected companies over long periods, even when not investing in them. In this way the firm can accumulate knowledge on which it can act quickly and with confidence when price and circumstances warrant.

        The purpose of this appraisal technique is to evaluate the investment potential and to assess the related risks of companies under review. There are very few large publicly held businesses that have the size, quality and predictability to qualify for consideration as an investment under the W.P. Stewart methodology. Accordingly, the number of U.S. companies approved as investment possibilities for the firm's U.S. concentrated growth strategy (e.g., its U.S. investment universe) consists of less than 50 businesses, which are selected based upon a consensus of its investment team. The global investment team considers no more than 100 companies for the global universe at a given time. The universe is then ranked by the relative price attractiveness of each current and prospective holding. Generally, W.P. Stewart tends to concentrate holdings in those with the greatest appreciation potential and sell off those that appear to be fully valued.

        Using thorough analysis and intensive research, W.P. Stewart selects investment candidates based in part on the following criteria:

        The results are compared to the general stock markets to determine the relative attractiveness of each company at a given moment. W.P. Stewart weighs economic, political and market factors in making investment decisions; this appraisal technique attempts to measure each investment candidate not only against other stocks of the same industry group, but also against a broad spectrum of investments. No method of fundamental or technical analysis, including that employed by the firm, has been proven to provide a guaranteed rate of return adjusted for investment risk.

        The determination of whether a particular investment prospect is eligible for inclusion in W.P. Stewart's investment universe is the result of a collective, debate-driven process that actively involves all members of the firm's investment team and reflects their collective research and analytical judgment and experience. While the entire investment team contributes to the research and appraisal process, each member has the freedom and responsibility to make investment decisions with respect to specific client accounts within the confines of the defined universe and established guidelines.


Table of Contents

        The following table shows assets under management by W.P. Stewart during the period from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2012. Changes between beginning and ending assets under management include capital appreciation or depreciation, net contributions and net new accounts opened/closed.


ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT

 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in millions)
 

Beginning Assets Under Management

 $1,382 $1,631 $1,542 
        

Ending Assets Under Management

 $1,642 $1,382 $1,631 
        

        The table below illustrates the total net flows of assets under management by W.P. Stewart which include changes in net flows of existing accounts and net new flows (net contributions to W.P. Stewart's publicly available funds and flows from new accounts minus closed accounts). The table excludes total capital appreciation or depreciation in assets under management with the exception of the amounts attributable to withdrawals and accounts closed.


NET FLOWS OF ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT

 
 Year Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in millions)
 

Existing Accounts:

          

Contributions

 $160 $90 $102 

Withdrawals

  (208) (183) (96)
        

Net Flows of Existing Accounts

  (48) (93) 6 

Publicly Available Funds:

          

Contributions

  88  31  148 

Withdrawals

  (33) (70) (109)

Direct Accounts Opened

  92  19  40 

Direct Accounts Closed

  (48) (132) (91)
        

Net New Flows

  99  (152) (12)
        

Net Flows of Assets Under Management

 $51 $(245)$(6)
        

        The following table shows client retention information of W.P. Stewart for the last three years.


ACCOUNT RETENTION

 
 Year Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2012 2011 2010 

Number of Accounts at Beginning of Period

  423  491  581 

Number of Accounts Closed During Period

  29  71  102 

Retention Rate

  93.1% 85.5% 82.4%

Table of Contents

        The following tables show, as of June 30, 2013, the percentage of assets under management for each investment strategy offered by W.P. Stewart.


ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT
BY STRATEGY

 
 As of June 30, 2013 

U.S. Concentrated Growth

  90.5%

Global Growth

  7.6%

EAFE Growth

  0.2%

Ultra-Concentrated Growth

  0.3%

Asia

  0.8%

Fixed Income/Other

  0.7%

        In late 2011, W.P. Stewart changed its independent auditor from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to Grant Thornton LLP. At the time of such change, there was no disagreement with respect to any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure. The audit committee of W.P. Stewart's board of directors recommended this change in auditors and the full board approved the change.


Management's Discussion and Analysis

        As used in this section, the words "we" and "our" and the "firm" and the "Company" refer collectively to W.P. Stewart & Co. Ltd. and its subsidiaries ("W.P. Stewart"), or to their officers and employees. Similarly, the word "company" refers to W.P. Stewart. We use "global" in this section to refer to all nations, including the United States; we use "non-U.S." to refer to nations other than the United States.


Overview

        W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd., together with its subsidiaries, is a research-focused investment adviser that manages assets for high net worth individuals and institutions located throughout the world. Our principal source of revenues is investment advisory fees and, accordingly, fluctuations in financial markets and client contributions and withdrawals have a direct effect on revenues and net income. Additionally, fees paid out is a variable expense that increases with additional assets under management and tends to partially offset fluctuations in revenue.

        Our advisory fees are computed quarterly based on account market values and fee rates pursuant to investment advisory contracts with clients. Our general policy is to bill clients quarterly, in advance. Under certain client contracts, we are entitled to receive performance fees when the return on assets under management exceeds specified benchmark returns or other performance targets. Performance fees are recorded as of the date on which the performance period ends.

        Another component of our revenues has historically been brokerage commissions. We ceased all brokerage activity as of December 1, 2010 and therefore no longer have had commission revenue following such date. Commission, clearing and trading expenses were a variable component of expenses which would partially offset commission revenue.

        Interest and other revenue primarily consists of interest earned on our cash management activities, foreign currency, investment and trading realized and unrealized gains and losses, subscription fees earned from our mutual funds and equity income relating to our investments in unconsolidated affiliates.


Table of Contents

        We provide competitive rewards to our employees through our compensation and benefits policies, together with our employee equity ownership practices. Employee compensation and benefits are our largest operating expense. We historically adjusted compensation for all employees depending on our operating results. Certain employees may also be eligible for other cash or non-cash incentive compensation. The most significant component of employee compensation and benefits is compensation paid to our research analysts/portfolio managers. Certain members of our senior investment team have arrangements pursuant to which compensation has both fixed and variable components. The fixed portion of the compensation is a specified amount. The variable portion of the compensation is based upon an evaluation of the portfolio manager's responsibilities as an analyst/portfolio manager. Additional variable components of compensation may be (a) based upon the firm's investment performance and/or (b) the potential to receive a percentage of performance fees, if any, earned by the team of managers. In addition, a percentage of overall compensation may be received in the form of restricted shares, which vest over time. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, our cash compensation and benefit expense for employees was approximately $10.8 million and $8.4 million, respectively. This increase reflects the additional incentive compensation paid as a result of the performance fee earned on one account, additional incentive compensation earned by the portfolio managers based on investment performance and the addition of staff in Hong Kong as a result of the Bowen acquisition in May 2012.

        Fees paid out are paid to select banks, investment firms and individuals with whom we have formal marketing arrangements and that make up our network of symbiotic marketers as well as to certain employees who earn a portion of their compensation based upon advisory fees paid by specified clients. We consider the banks, investment firms and individuals who gather assets for us to be symbiotic marketers of our services because of the mutual benefits that flow from the relationship—they are able to offer premier equity investment management services to their clients and we are able to extend the reach of our asset-gathering efforts. These fees are based on the market value of referred accounts and vary based on new account generation and fluctuations in the market value of referred accounts.

        Research and administration expenses include research, travel and entertainment, communications, insurance, information technology systems support and occupancy.

        Marketing expenses represent costs associated with our internal marketing initiatives and client servicing activities, and include client seminars, marketing related travel and other operational expenses. Marketing expenses also included marketing related compensation for the employees in the Amsterdam office for the years 2010, 2009 and 2008; the results for 2011 and later periods reflect the transfer of that expense to the Employee Compensation and Benefits expenses category in an effort to aggregate all employee related cost.

        Other operating expenses include professional fees consisting of auditing, tax, legal and consulting fees, charitable contributions and other administration expenses.

        Income from our operations in the United States and from our U.S. subsidiaries is subject to income taxes imposed by U.S. federal, state and local authorities. In addition, our non-U.S. subsidiaries are subject to income taxes imposed by the jurisdictions in which they conduct business. Furthermore, we have valuation allowances on net deferred tax assets in several jurisdictions. Accordingly, our effective tax rate has been driven by the mix of income and losses in the various tax jurisdictions in which we conduct business activity and valuation allowances in certain jurisdictions.

        In May 2010, the Company completed a corporate reorganization that changed the corporate tax profile of the Company. As a result, the majority of the operations are now subject to tax in the U.S. (including state and local tax) and the effective tax rate is expected to be primarily driven by changes in the liability for uncertain tax positions because any anticipated earnings or losses in the near future in the U.S. are otherwise expected to attract a 0% tax rate due to the valuation allowances on the net deferred tax assets in those jurisdictions.


Table of Contents

        In May 2012, the Company acquired all of the stock of Bowen Asia Limited for the purpose of continuing the receipt of investment research and sub-advisory services. The Company has worked closely with Bowen since 2004 on the Asian investments in its global portfolios. The purchase price was $1 with additional consideration of approximately $250,000 provided to Bowen at acquisition so it could make certain payments at the closing of the transaction.

        Substantially all of our employees are given the opportunity to become shareholders during their first year of employment with us. As a result, virtually all of our employees are shareholders of W.P. Stewart & Co., Ltd. and participate in the results of our operations.

                Operating Results

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 as Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

Assets Under Management

        Assets under management were approximately $2.0 billion at June 30, 2013, an increase of approximately $0.4 billion, or 25%, from approximately $1.6 billion at December 31, 2012. The increase in assets under management resulted from positive investment performance results for our clients plus positive net flows of assets. The performance for the W.P. Stewart U.S. Concentrated Growth Composite for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was 16.3%, gross (pre-fee), and 15.4%, net (post-fee), compared to 13.8% for the S&P 500 Index.

        The following table sets forth the total net flows of assets under management for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, which include changes in net flows of existing accounts and net new flows (net contributions to our publicly available funds and flows from new accounts minus closed accounts). The table excludes total capital appreciation or depreciation in assets under management with the exception of the amounts attributable to withdrawals and closed accounts.

 
 Six Months
Ended
June 30,
 
Net Flows of Assets Under Management
(in millions)
 2013 2012 

Existing Accounts:

       

Contributions

 $63 $102 

Withdrawals

  (68) (143)
      

Net Flows of Existing Accounts

  (5) (41)
      

Publicly Available Funds:

       

Contributions

  122  26 

Withdrawals

  (15) (15)

Direct Accounts Opened

  14  53 

Direct Accounts Closed

  (13) (22)
      

Net New Flows

  108  42 
      

Net Flows of Assets Under Management

 $103 $1 
      

Revenues

        Revenues were $10.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, an increase of $2.4 million, or 28.8%, from $8.3 million earned for the comparable period of the prior year. The change was due to a $0.9 million, or 11.4%, increase in fee revenue, a $0.4 million, or 73.0%, increase in interest and other revenues and a $1.1 million realized gain on the investment in Kirk Management, Ltd., a Bermuda joint venture company which was 40% owned by the Company.


Table of Contents

        The average gross fee earned from client accounts, including the effect of any performance fees, was 0.94% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 0.99% for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Excluding performance fee based accounts, which pay a lower quarterly base fee plus an annual performance fee at year-end, if earned, the average gross management fee was 1.19% and 1.21% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

        The change in fee revenue was the result of an increase in assets under management for the first half of 2013, offset slightly by a lower average fee rate.

        Realized and unrealized gains on investments remained relatively flat for the six months ended June 30, 2013 as compared with the comparable period of the prior year. Interest and other revenues increased primarily due to a higher interest income earned on our cash management and investment activities.

Expenses

        Expenses, excluding income taxes, decreased approximately $0.2 million, or 1.5%, to $11.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 from $11.3 million in the prior year.

        The most significant items which caused this decrease were (a) a decrease of $0.2 million in research and administration and (b) a decrease of $0.3 million in marketing expenses. These decreases were partially offset by:

        Our income tax provision was approximately $2,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 as opposed to a tax benefit of $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The tax benefit in 2012 primarily resulted from a reversal of the reserve for uncertain tax positions related to the settlement of an on-going New York state audit. The effective U.S. GAAP tax rates were approximately -1% and 32% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Net Income/(Loss)

        Our net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $0.3 million as compared to a net loss of $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 due to the factors detailed above.

Year Ended December 31, 2012 as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2011

Assets Under Management

        Assets under management were approximately $1.6 billion at December 31, 2012, an increase of approximately $0.2 billion, or 19%, from approximately $1.4 billion at December 31, 2011. The increase in assets under management resulted from positive investment performance results for our clients plus positive net flows of assets. The performance for the W.P. Stewart U.S. Concentrated Growth Composite for the year ended December 31, 2012 was 18.1%, gross (pre-fee), and 16.6%, net (post-fee), compared to 16.0% for the S&P 500 Index.

        The following table sets forth the total net flows of assets under management for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, which include changes in net flows of existing accounts and net new flows (net contributions to our publicly available funds and flows from new accounts minus closed accounts).


Table of Contents

The table excludes total capital appreciation or depreciation in assets under management with the exception of the amounts attributable to withdrawals and closed accounts.

 
 Years Ended
December 31,
 
Net Flows of Assets Under Management
(in millions)
 2012 2011 

Existing Accounts:

       

Contributions

 $160 $90 

Withdrawals

  (208) (183)
      

Net Flows of Existing Accounts

  (48) (93)
      

Publicly Available Funds:

       

Contributions

  88  31 

Withdrawals

  (33) (70)

Direct Accounts Opened

  92  19 

Direct Accounts Closed

  (48) (132)
      

Net New Flows

  99  (152)
      

Net Flows of Assets Under Management

 $51 $(245)
      

Revenues

        Revenues were $22.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, an increase of $6.6 million, or 41.6%, from $15.9 million earned for the year ended December 31, 2011. The change was due to a $5.3 million, or 33.5%, increase in fee revenue, a $0.7 million gain in realized and unrealized gains on investments as opposed to a $0.1 million loss in the prior year and a $0.6 million, or 336.4%, increase in interest and other revenues.

        The average gross fee earned from client accounts, including the effect of any performance fees, was 0.99% for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 1.00% for the year ended December 31, 2011. Excluding performance fee based accounts, which pay a lower quarterly base fee plus an annual performance fee at year-end, if earned, the average gross management fee was 1.21% and 1.24% for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

        The change in fee revenue was the result of an increase in assets under management for 2012, offset slightly by a lower average fee rate.

        In addition, fee income for the year ended December 31, 2012 includes performance fees of $5.9 million while for the year ended December 31, 2011 performance fees included in fee income were lower at $0.9 million.

        Realized and unrealized gains on investments were higher for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared with the prior year primarily due to gains realized on the liquidation of certain investments and market fluctuations affecting the value of our investments in 2012. Interest and other revenues increased primarily due to a higher interest income earned on our cash management and investment activities.

Expenses

        Expenses, excluding income taxes, increased approximately $1.4 million, or 6.0%, to $25.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $23.8 million in the prior year.

        The most significant items which caused this increase were


Table of Contents

        These increases were partially offset by a decrease in (a) marketing expenses of $0.2 million, and (b) employee compensation and benefits of $0.5 million due to an increase in additional incentive compensation earned by the portfolio managers based on investment performance and the addition of staff in Hong Kong as a result of the Bowen acquisition more than offset by the decrease in non-cash expense related to the amortization of restricted stock awards which were granted at lower share prices in recent years.

        Our income tax provision of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 changed to a tax benefit of $4.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The tax benefit in 2012 primarily resulted from a reversal of the reserve for uncertain tax positions related to the settlement of an on-going New York state audit and a reversal on previously established reserves due to the lapse of the applicable statute of limitations. The effective U.S. GAAP tax rates were approximately 182.84% for 2012 and -1.46% for 2011.


Net Income/(Loss)

        Our net income for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $2.2 million as compared to a net loss of $7.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, an increase of $10.1 million due to the factors detailed.


Inflation

        Our assets are largely liquid in nature and, therefore, not significantly affected by inflation. However, the rate of inflation may affect our expenses, such as information technology and occupancy costs, which may not be readily recoverable in the pricing of the services that we provide. To the extent inflation results in rising interest rates and has other negative effects upon the securities markets, it may adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.


Liquidity and Capital Resources

        Our financial condition is highly liquid with principal assets including cash and cash equivalents, investments, trading, investments available for sale and receivables from clients. Cash equivalents are primarily short-term, highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase. Liabilities include operating payables and accrued compensation. In general, our investment advisory activities do not require us to maintain significant capital balances. However, our advisory activities for clients in The Netherlands require us to maintain certain minimum levels of capital. In addition, our Hong Kong subsidiary acquired in May 2012, Bowen Asia Limited, is required to maintain minimum levels of capital; as Bowen Asia Limited currently operates at a loss, we expect to be required to maintain capital requirements through additional funding of equity capital. We have consistently maintained net capital in excess of the prescribed amounts. Historically, we have met our liquidity requirements with cash generated from our operations. Nevertheless, we operated at a loss on a cash basis for each of the five fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 through 2012.

        At December 31, 2012, we had cash and marketable securities of $17.7 million and did not have any debt. At June 30, 2013 and August 31, 2013, we had cash and marketable securities of approximately $23.8 million and $24.8 million, respectively, and did not have any debt. We anticipate that in the near-term our current cash reserve in addition to cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for operating activities and other cash obligations as they come due, as well as our anticipated capital requirements. However, unless we return to profitability on a cash basis, our liquidity, facilities and overall financial position will weaken. A continued operating loss will not be sustainable in the long run. Therefore, over the last several years we have taken steps to retain our current client base, improve our level of assets under management and rationalize our


Table of Contents

expense base to reflect our current position and current market conditions. In 2007, we initiated an expense reduction program that continued into 2011. Under that program we reduced our employee headcount from 113 at December 31, 2006 to 104 at December 31, 2007 to 43 at December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2012, we had 48 employees (including 7 employees of Bowen Asia Limited). In addition, we sold our corporate jet in the third quarter of 2007 and have undertaken other cost-cutting efforts, including the completion of the Company's corporate restructuring and reorganization in May 2010. In this restructuring, the Company reorganized from an exempted company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of Bermuda to a Delaware corporation. In addition, other subsidiaries redomiciled to Delaware. Our Bermuda office was closed and operations previously conducted in Bermuda were concentrated in New York. In that regard, in May 2010, Kirk Management, the joint venture company that owned our headquarters building in Bermuda completed its sale of the building. In early 2013, Kirk Management merged into a new Bermuda company wholly owned by the Company, named WPS Kirk, Ltd. In connection with this merger WPS Kirk, Ltd. paid the other joint venture partner in Kirk Management for its investment. Furthermore, in December 2010, our broker-dealer subsidiary ceased operations and we entered into a relationship with Pershing Advisor Solutions LLC ("PAS") whereby PAS and its affiliate Pershing LLC would provide prime brokerage and brokerage related services to the Company and its clients. This new arrangement with PAS was intended to streamline operations and help reduce certain costs related to the operations of our broker-dealer. Further, in January 2009, our common shares were delisted from the New York Stock Exchange and we filed a Certification and Notice of Termination of Registration on Form 15 with the SEC to suspend the registration of the Company's shares under the Exchange Act. Also, in connection with the restructuring completed in May 2010 mentioned above, our common shares were delisted from the Bermuda Stock Exchange and are currently only traded in the Pink Sheets under the symbol "WPSL". These delistings and deregistration have resulted in, and are expected to continue to result in, significant cost savings.

        Despite our cost cutting initiatives, we continue to operate at a loss on a cash basis. While we intend to attempt further steps to improve our revenues, there are no certainties that we will be successful. Additional rationalization of our expenses may also be explored but we do not expect that the same level of cost cutting measures as in recent years will be able to be continued further as significant measures have already been taken. Past actions and future measures have been taken with the intention of returning to profitability on a cash basis; however, there can be no assurance that we will achieve sufficient revenues or cost reductions to be successful. As previously mentioned, we purchased all the outstanding equity in Bowen Asia Limited in May 2012. Bowen Asia Limited has operated, and continues to operate, at a loss. Nevertheless, we believed integrating this long-standing research partner into our firm structure was strategically advantageous in the long run.

        Historically, we had a policy of declaring quarterly cash dividends on our common shares, which were funded out of operating cash flow. In October 2007, we announced that we were suspending regular quarterly cash dividend payments in order to preserve cash resources in connection with our business turnaround efforts. Presently we do not intend to pay any cash dividends for 2013. Historically, our board of directors has also considered opportunities for share repurchases with a view toward increasing long-term shareholder value to the extent warranted in relation to our cash position and earnings. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we repurchased 37,177 common shares from employees for an aggregate purchase price of $178,078. Further, during 2012, we repurchased an additional 100,000 common shares from a fund managed by Arrow Capital Management for an aggregate purchase price of $448,000. Additionally, our Board of Directors has approved a stock repurchase program of up to 10% of the currently outstanding shares of the Company from time to time in the discretion of the Board's Executive Committee, whether in open market transactions or privately negotiated transactions. Repurchased shares are cancelled or held in treasury for general corporate purposes. We intend to fund any such repurchases with cash on hand.


Table of Contents


Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

Stock Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers and 5% Stockholders

        The following table sets forth the number and the percentage of shares of W.P. Stewart common stock that were beneficially owned by the executive officers, directors and known 5% stockholders of W.P. Stewart, and by all current directors and executive officers as a group, as of September 11,30, 2013. Except as otherwise indicated, each director, executive officer or 5% stockholder listed below possessed sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares. Unless otherwise indicated below, the business address of each such beneficial owner is the address of W.P. Stewart at 527 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

Name of Beneficial Owner
 Number of Shares Owned Percent of Class(1)  Number of Shares Owned Percent of Class(1) 

Michael Maquet

 120,000 2.42% 120,000 2.42%

Mark I. Phelps

 
61,022
 
1.23

%
 
61,022
 
1.23

%

James Tierney

 
47,476
 
*
  
47,476
 
*
 

Seth Pearlstein

 
20,995
 
*
  
20,995
 
*
 

William P. Stewart

 
932,176

(2)
 
18.80

%
 
932,176

(2)
 
18.80

%

Alexandre von Furstenberg
c/o Ranger Global Advisors, LLC
9465 Wilshire Blvd., PH
Beverly Hills, CA 90212

 
848,918

(3)
 
17.12

%
 
848,918

(3)
 
17.12

%

Mal Serure
c/o Arrow Capital Management, LLC
499 Park Avenue, 10th Floor
New York, NY 10022

 
941,815

(4)
 
18.99

%
 
941,815

(4)
 
18.99

%

Fred Mulder

 
1,000
 
*
  
1,000
 
*
 

Charles Price

 
0
 
*
  
0
 
*
 

Financial & Investment Management Group, Ltd.
111 Cass Street
Traverse City, MI 49684

 
827,591

(5)
 
16.68

%
 
839,941

(5)
 
16.68

%

All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (9 persons)

 
2,973,402
 
59.96

%
 
2,973,402
 
59.96

%

*
Less than 1% of class.

(1)
Based on 4,958,778 shares of W.P. Stewart's common stock issued and outstanding as of September 11, 2013.

(2)
Consists of (i) 35,753 shares of common stock owned by Mr. Stewart individually, (ii) 223,788 shares of common stock held by Stewart Trust 1987- FBO Gregory S. Stewart, (iii) 203,051 shares of common stock held by Stewart Trust 1987- FBO Jeffery R. Stewart, (iv) 20,736 shares of common stock held by Stewart Trust 1992- FBO Jeffery R. Stewart, (v) 225,060 shares of common stock held by Lisa Stewart Family Trust, and (vi) 223,788 shares of common stock held by Stewart Trust 1987- FBO William P. Stewart III. Mr. Stewart serves as the sole trustee of the Stewart Trust 1987- FBO Gregory S. Stewart, Stewart Trust 1987- FBO Jeffery R. Stewart, Stewart Trust 1992-FBO Jeffery R. Stewart, Lisa Stewart Family Trust and Stewart Trust 1987- FBO William P. Stewart III (collectively, the "Family Trusts"), and has voting and investment control

Table of Contents

(3)
Consists of (i) 48,424 shares of common stock owned by Mr. von Furstenberg individually, (ii) 755,841 shares of common stock owned by Ranger Global LP., and (iii) 44,653 shares of common stock held by a family member over which he has power of attorney. Mr. von Furstenberg serves as a principal of the manager of Ranger Global LP and has voting and investment control over the shares of common stock held by Ranger Global L.P. As a result, Mr. von Furstenberg may be deemed to have beneficial ownership over the shares of common stock held by Ranger Global LP. Mr. von Furstenberg disclaims beneficial ownership over the shares of common stock held by Ranger Global LP, and over which he has power of attorney, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(4)
Consists of (i) 247,328 shares of common stock held by Arrow Partners LP, (ii) 53,862 shares of common stock held by Arrow Offshore, Ltd., and (iii) 640,625 shares of common stock held by Arrow Opportunity I, Ltd. Mr. Serure serves as a principal of the manager of Arrow Partners LP, Arrow Offshore, Ltd. and Arrow Opportunity I, Ltd. (collectively, the "Arrow Funds") and has voting and investment control over the shares of common stock held by the Arrow Funds. As a result, Mr. Serure may be deemed to have beneficial ownership over the shares of common stock held by the Arrow Funds. Mr. Serure disclaims beneficial ownership over the shares of common stock held by the Arrow Funds, except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.

(5)
Based upon information as of July 31,September 30, 2013 contained in a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on September 4,October 23, 2013 by Financial & Investment Management Group, Ltd. reporting shared voting power and shared dispositive power over 827,591839,941 shares of common stock.

Table of Contents


THE SPECIAL MEETING OF W.P. STEWART STOCKHOLDERS

General

        W.P. Stewart is furnishing this proxy statement/prospectus to W.P. Stewart stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the W.P. Stewart board of directors for use at the special meeting of stockholders, including any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting.


Date, Time and Place

        W.P. Stewart will hold its special meeting on [          ], 2013 at [                ], local time, at the offices of Nixon Peabody LLP, located at 437 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022.


Purpose of the Meeting

        At the special meeting, W.P. Stewart stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon the following matters:


Quorum Required

        W.P. Stewart's bylaws provide that the holders of one-third of the shares of stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the special meeting. In the event that a quorum is not present at the special meeting, the special meeting may be adjourned, either by the chairman of the meeting or by vote of the holders of a majority of the shares represented at such meeting.


Voting Rights

        W.P. Stewart common stock is the only type of security entitled to vote at the special meeting. On [          ], 2013, the record date for determination of stockholders entitled to vote at the special meeting, there were [          ] shares of W.P. Stewart common stock outstanding. Each W.P. Stewart stockholder of record on [          ], 2013 is entitled to one vote for each share of W.P. Stewart common stock held by such stockholder on that date. If shares or other securities having voting power stand of record in the names of two or more persons, whether fiduciaries, members of a partnership, joint tenants, tenants in common, tenants by the entirety, or otherwise, or if two or more persons have the same fiduciary relationship respecting the same shares, unless the secretary of W.P. Stewart is given written notice to the contrary and is furnished with a copy of the instrument or order appointing them or creating the relationship wherein it is so provided, their acts with respect to voting shall have the following effect: (a) if only one votes, his or her act binds all; (b) if more than one votes, the act of the majority so voting binds all; (c) if more than one votes, but the vote is evenly split, each faction may vote the common stock proportionally, or may apply to the Delaware Court of Chancery for relief as provided in the DGCL, Section 217(b). If the instrument filed with the secretary of W.P. Stewart shows that any


Table of Contents

such tenancy is held in unequal interests, a majority or even-split for the purpose of (c) above shall be a majority or even-split in interest.


Proxies

        Whether or not you are able to attend W.P. Stewart's special meeting of stockholders, you are urged to complete and return the enclosed proxy, which is solicited by W.P. Stewart's board of directors and which will be voted as you direct on your proxy card when properly completed. In the event no directions are specified, executed proxies will be votedFOR the adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger,FOR the proposal to adjourn the special meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies if there are not sufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger, and in the discretion of the proxy holders as to any other matters that may properly come before the special meeting. All shares represented by a valid proxy received before the special meeting will be voted.


Revocation of Proxies

        You may also revoke or change your proxy at any time before the special meeting. To do this, send a written notice of revocation or another signed proxy with a later date to Proxy Services, c/o Computershare Investor Services, P.O. Box 43126, Providence, RI 02949-5138 in time to be received before the beginning of the special meeting. You may also revoke your proxy by attending the special meeting and voting in person.


W.P. Stewart Votes Required

        The affirmative vote of the holders of record of a majority of the outstanding shares of W.P. Stewart common stock is required to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger, and the affirmative vote of the holders of record of a majority of the shares of W.P. Stewart common stock present and entitled to vote at the special meeting is required to adopt the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies. If a broker or other nominee holding shares of W.P. Stewart common stock or a holder of W.P. Stewart common stock fails to vote on the adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the merger or responds to that proposal with an "abstain" vote, it will have the same effect as a vote against that proposal. If a broker or other nominee holding shares of W.P. Stewart common stock or a holder of W.P. Stewart common stock responds to the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies with an "abstain" vote, it will have the same effect as a vote against that proposal. If a broker or other nominee holding W.P. Stewart common stock or a holder of W.P. Stewart common stock fails to vote on the proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary, to permit further solicitation of proxies, it will have no effect on the outcome of the vote for that proposal.

        As of the record date, the directors and executive officers of W.P. Stewart beneficially owned approximately [          ] shares of W.P. Stewart common stock, representing approximately [          ]% of the outstanding shares of W.P. Stewart common stock and AllianceBernstein and its affiliates beneficially owned none of W.P. Stewart's common stock.

        Certain holders of W.P. Stewart common stock, each of which is or is an affiliate of a member of W.P. Stewart's board of directors, who as of the record date collectively owned approximately [          ]% of the outstanding shares of W.P. Stewart common stock, have entered into voting agreements with AllianceBernstein pursuant to which such stockholders have agreed, among other things, to vote the shares of common stock of W.P. Stewart owned by them in favor of adopting the merger agreement and approving the merger. In addition, William P. Stewart has entered into an agreement pursuant to which he has agreed to vote the shares over which he has sole voting authority in favor of adopting the merger agreement and approving the merger. For a description of the voting agreements, see "Certain


Table of Contents

Terms of the Merger Agreement—Voting Agreements" beginning on page [          ] of this proxy statement/prospectus.


Recommendation of W.P. Stewart's Board of Directors

        The board of directors of W.P. Stewart has determined and believes that the merger agreement and the merger are advisable for, and in the best interests of, W.P. Stewart and its stockholders and has approved and adopted the merger agreement and the merger. The board of directors of W.P. Stewart unanimously recommends that W.P. Stewart stockholders voteFOR adoption of the merger agreement and approval of the merger.

        The board of directors of W.P. Stewart unanimously recommends that W.P. Stewart stockholders voteFOR approval of the possible adjournment or postponement of the special meeting of W.P. Stewart stockholders.


Voting in Person

        If you plan to attend W.P. Stewart's special meeting and wish to vote in person, you will be given a ballot at the special meeting.

        You should submit your completed proxy even if you plan to attend the special meeting. If you are the stockholder of record of your shares of W.P. Stewart common stock, you can change your vote at the special meeting. If you hold shares in street name, you may not vote in person at the special meeting unless you obtain a signed proxy from the record holder giving you the right to vote the shares in person at the meeting.

Your vote is important. Accordingly, please sign and return the enclosed proxy card whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting in person.


Adjournments and Postponements

        Although it is not currently expected, the special meeting may be adjourned or postponed to a later date or time, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in the event there are insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to adopt the merger agreement. W.P. Stewart's bylaws provide that notice need not be given of the adjourned meeting if the time and place of the adjourned meeting are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken. At the adjourned meeting, W.P. Stewart may transact any business that might have been transacted at the original meeting. If the adjournment is for more than thirty days, or if after the adjournment a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, a notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting.

        Any signed proxies received by W.P. Stewart in which no voting instructions are provided on such matter will be votedFOR an adjournment of the special meeting to a later date or time, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies in the event there are insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to adopt the merger agreement, and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger. Whether or not a quorum exists, holders of a majority of the shares of W.P. Stewart's common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting may adjourn the special meeting. Because a majority of the votes represented at the meeting, whether or not a quorum exists, is required to approve the proposal to adjourn the meeting, abstentions will have the same effect on such proposal as a voteAGAINST the proposal. Broker non-votes and any shares that are not voted will have no effect on the proposal to adjourn the special meeting. W.P. Stewart stockholders who have already sent in their proxies may revoke them at any time before their use at the special meeting as adjourned or postponed.


Table of Contents


Stock Certificates

        You should not send in any stock certificates with your proxy card. If you are a W.P. Stewart stockholder, after the merger is completed, a letter of transmittal will be sent to you informing you where to deliver your W.P. Stewart stock certificates in order to receive the merger consideration. You should not send in your W.P. Stewart common stock certificates before receiving this letter of transmittal.


Solicitation of Proxies

        W.P. Stewart will bear the cost of this solicitation, including the printing and mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus, the proxy and any additional soliciting material furnished to W.P. Stewart stockholders. Copies of solicitation material will be furnished to brokerage houses, fiduciaries and custodians holding shares in their names that are beneficially owned by others so that they may forward this solicitation material to such beneficial owners. In addition, W.P. Stewart may reimburse such persons for their costs of forwarding the solicitation material to such beneficial owners. The original solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by solicitation by telephone, email, facsimile or other means by directors, officers, employees or agents of W.P. Stewart. No additional compensation will be paid to these individuals for any such services.


Questions and Additional Information

        W.P. Stewart's stockholders who have questions about the merger, including the procedures for voting their shares of W.P. Stewart common stock, or how to submit their proxy, or who need additional copies, without charge, of this proxy statement/prospectus, should contact:

Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3078
(877) 373-6374


Table of Contents


THE MERGER

General

        The discussion of the merger in this proxy statement/prospectus and the description of the merger are only summaries of the material features of the proposed merger. W.P. Stewart stockholders can obtain a more complete understanding of the merger by reading the merger agreement and the form of CVR agreement, copies of which are attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A and Annex B, respectively. W.P. Stewart stockholders are encouraged to read the merger agreement, the form of CVR agreement and the other annexes to this proxy statement/prospectus in their entirety.


General Description of the Merger

        In the merger, Merger Sub will merge with and into W.P. Stewart, with W.P. Stewart continuing as the surviving entity and a wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein.

        Upon completion of the merger, if the merger agreement is adopted by W.P. Stewart's stockholders and the other conditions to the merger are satisfied or waived, each share of W.P. Stewart common stock will be converted into the right to receive (i) $12.00, less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest, per share and (ii) one CVR representing the right to receive an additional cash payment of $4.00, less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest, if and to the extent that any amount is payable as determined in accordance with the CVR agreement to be entered into in connection with the merger.

        In connection with the closing of the merger, AllianceBernstein and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC. as trustee, will enter into a contingent value rights agreement substantially in the form of the contingent value rights agreement included in this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B. A holder of a CVR is entitled to a cash payment, less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest, in an amount equal to $4.00 per CVR upon the achievement of the AUM milestone. "AUM milestone" means the first date, on or prior to the third anniversary of the date on which the effective time of the merger occurs, on which any one or more of the following occurs: (i) assets under management (as defined elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus) exceeds $5,000,000,000 (provided, that such date must be either (x) the last day of a calendar month or (y) a mid-month measuring date, as defined below), (ii) any merger or consolidation of W.P. Stewart with or into any person or any sale or disposition to any person or persons of all or substantially all of the common stock or assets of W.P. Stewart in any transaction or series of transactions, unless in each case AllianceBernstein or one or more of its affiliates (or their ultimate parent company) would wholly own (other than any employee equity interests) the surviving or resulting company or substantially all of the assets used in the investment advisory business of W.P. Stewart immediately thereafter (not including any consolidation or merger, share exchange, reorganization, tender or exchange offer or any other business combination transaction involving AllianceBernstein or any parent company), (iii) the discontinuation or cessation of all or substantially all of the business of WPS group (as defined elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus), (iv) any willful and material breach of the specified conduct (as defined elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus) obligations of AllianceBernstein, or (v) the occurrence of any breach that materially and adversely impacts the ability to achieve the AUM milestone. For a detailed description of the CVR agreement, see "Description of the CVRs" beginning on page [          ] of this proxy statement/prospectus.

        If, at the end of any calendar month before the third anniversary of the date on which the effective time of the merger occurs, assets under management (as defined elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus) exceeds $4,500,000,000 (such date is referred to as a "month-end triggering date"), AllianceBernstein must, within five business days, indicate such fact in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC. Upon the occurrence of any month-end triggering date, holders of the


Table of Contents

CVRs have the right, upon the written demand of not less that 25% of the outstanding CVRs, and upon 15 days' notice to AllianceBernstein, to require AllianceBernstein to determine the amount of assets under management as of the close of business on the 15th day of any calendar month after the month-end triggering date (any such day is referred to as a "mid-month measuring date"); provided, however, that the holders of the CVRs may only exercise such right up to six times in any calendar year.


Background of the Merger

        Over the past several years, W.P. Stewart has from time to time explored various strategic alternatives available to the company, including potential business combinations and acquisitions of the company by a third party. In June 2011, W.P. Stewart's board of directors determined to expand a search it had commenced a year earlier for a potential business combination transaction and/or the sale of all or part of the company, and it engaged Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. ("KBW") to serve as its independent financial advisor in that search.

        During late Summer and early Fall of 2011, W.P. Stewart received three preliminary indications of interest from parties proposing a potential acquisition of W.P. Stewart. After preliminary discussions, it became clear that none of these parties was willing to offer a significant premium to W.P. Stewart's over-the-counter market quotation price. Ultimately, no definitive agreement was reached with any of these parties.

        In September 2011, W.P. Stewart entered into discussions to acquire Bowen Asia Limited ("Bowen"). W.P. Stewart had a long-standing relationship with Bowen, including previously owning a significant investment interest in Bowen, and Bowen having managed W.P. Stewart's Asian funds. At the time, Bowen was experiencing financial difficulties, but the W.P. Stewart board of directors deemed Bowen as being integral to W.P. Stewart maintaining Asian distribution, coverage and analysis capabilities. In late October 2011, W.P. Stewart and Bowen entered into a nonbinding term sheet pursuant to which W.P. Stewart would acquire Bowen for a nominal sum.

        In early April 2012, W.P. Stewart and KBW submitted a process letter to a number of potential bidders identified by KBW that outlined the procedures for submitting indications of interest with respect to a transaction with W.P. Stewart. W.P. Stewart executed nondisclosure agreements with interested bidders, who were then granted access to a data site containing additional information regarding W.P. Stewart.

        As a result of the exploratory process run by KBW, W.P. Stewart received four non-binding preliminary indications of interest. W.P. Stewart's management continued to negotiate with the two potential counterparties that appeared to represent the best strategic fit on an ongoing basis, but the parties were unable to agree to definitive terms.

        In May 2012, W.P. Stewart closed its acquisition of Bowen for a nominal sum, ensuring that W.P. Stewart would be able to maintain its Asian presence.

        In August 2012, the board of directors of W.P. Stewart held a meeting to discuss potential strategic partners, as well as to evaluate alternatives other than a business combination transaction, including expanding the company's marketing presence and continuing as a standalone enterprise. At this meeting, the board of directors determined that there were no viable alternatives for a business combination transaction based upon W.P. Stewart's attempted sale process, and W.P. Stewart subsequently terminated KBW as its financial advisor.

        In November 2012, the major stockholders of W.P. Stewart received an indication of interest from a group of private investors that proposed to purchase from such stockholders approximately 25% of W.P. Stewart's common stock at a price consistent with the company's then current trading price. Due


Table of Contents

to provisions of W.P. Stewart's certificate of incorporation that limit major share ownership, the consent of W.P. Stewart's board of directors would have been required for that proposed transaction, and the board of directors requested that the offer be made to all holders of W.P. Stewart common stock and not just the major stockholders. As a result of this, as well as further discussions between management and the private investors, in mid-January of 2013, the private investors submitted a revised bid for the purchase of 24.95% of W.P. Stewart's common stock pursuant to a tender offer, with W.P. Stewart granting the private investors warrants that would have become exercisable upon the company meeting certain thresholds and, if such thresholds were met, would have enabled them to acquire a majority of the outstanding common stock of W.P. Stewart. For several months, W.P. Stewart and the private investors continued discussions about a potential transaction, which underwent several potential iterations. In late March 2013, discussions between W.P. Stewart and the private investors ceased when the private investors were unable to obtain sufficient financing for the proposed transaction.

        In late March 2013, W.P. Stewart and AllianceBernstein began to discuss potential strategic alliances. As part of its ongoing efforts to diversify its product offerings, AllianceBernstein had identified W.P. Stewart as a U.S. equity manager with a high quality equity track record, and determined that W.P. Stewart would be a potentially attractive acquisition target. AllianceBernstein initiated contact with a representative of a large stockholder of W.P. Stewart, who in turn relayed AllianceBernstein's interest to Mark Phelps, acting Chief Executive Officer of W.P. Stewart, and James Tierney, W.P. Stewart's Chief Investment Officer. On March 26, 2013, AllianceBernstein representatives Mark Buckley, Director of Global Business Development, and Chris Bricker, Senior Managing Director and Head of Product Development, met with Mr. Tierney and Michael Walker, and Stacey Broadbar, members of W.P. Stewart's investment team, and discussed W.P. Stewart's investment philosophy and investment process, as well as the W.P. Stewart management and investment team, W.P. Stewart's employees, locations and client base. At this meeting, the AllianceBernstein representatives indicated their interest in a potential acquisition of W.P. Stewart.

        Following this initial preliminary discussion, the parties determined to enter into a nondisclosure agreement to enable AllianceBernstein to commence due diligence on W.P. Stewart. On April 3, 2013, W.P. Stewart entered into a nondisclosure agreement with AllianceBernstein pursuant to which AllianceBernstein would be able to access W.P. Stewart's electronic data site. On April 12, James Gingrich, AllianceBernstein's Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Bricker and Mr. Buckley met with Mr. Tierney and Mr. Phelps and continued their discussion of the history of W.P. Stewart, W.P. Stewart's real estate footprint, investment philosophy and investment processes, as well as W.P. Stewart's management team and operations. On April 25, 2013, Mr. Tierney together with Mark Bergen, W.P. Stewart's Chief Financial Officer, and Mr. Pearlstein, had a telephone conversation with Mr. Buckley, Mr. Bricker, Jeffrey Kurpiel, AllianceBernstein's Director of Tax, Edward Farrell, AllianceBernstein's Chief Accounting Officer, and John Weisenseel, AllianceBernstein's Chief Financial Officer, during which they held preliminary discussions concerning the possible structure of a transaction. On May 13, Andrew Chin, AllianceBernstein's Chief Risk Officer, Mr. Bricker and Mr. Buckley met with Mr. Tierney, Mr. Phelps, Ms. Broadbar, and Mr. Walker to further discuss W.P. Stewart's investment process, focusing in particular on W.P. Stewart's research methodologies, risk management procedures and portfolio optimization methodologies. On May 22, Mr. Bricker and Mr. Buckley had a telephone conversation with Mr. Pearlstein and Mr. Bergen, during which they discussed the contours and structure of a potential transaction. During that conversation, Mr. Bricker and Mr. Buckley indicated that AllianceBernstein was considering making an offer to acquire W.P. Stewart. They also discussed the operations of the combined company, including AllianceBernstein's desire to maintain W.P. Stewart's senior investment team following an acquisition.

        Also in late May 2013, W.P. Stewart began discussions with a large investment advisory firm regarding a potential business transaction pursuant to which an affiliate of that firm would become the investment adviser to the W.P. Stewart & Co. Growth Fund, W.P. Stewart would serve as a subadvisor to


Table of Contents

the fund and the fund would be operated as part of that firm's platform. The transaction was a commercial transaction, rather than a transaction involving a potential change of control of W.P. Stewart. It did not involve a proposal to acquire W.P. Stewart or any of its equity securities. Instead, the transaction would have involved only a transfer in the advisory responsibility for the fund to the investment advisory firm. Under the proposed arrangement, W.P. Stewart would have received a reduced subadvisory fee with the advisory firm responsible for fund distribution. The firm proposed financial terms of the proposed transaction, which would not have resulted in a change in control of W.P. Stewart or any liquidity or premium to W.P. Stewart's stockholders, on June 4, 2013.

        In an effort to create stockholder value and permit the acting Chief Executive Officer Mark Phelps to concentrate on his role with the company's investment team, the board of directors engaged in an extensive executive search. This ultimately led to W.P. Stewart offering to hire Michael Maquet as Chief Executive Officer, and this hiring was finalized on June 6, 2013.

        On May 29, 2013, Mr. Bricker, Sharon Fay, AllianceBernstein's Head of Equities, and Mr. Chin met with Mr. Tierney and discussed W.P. Stewart's investment processes, the history of its research team and its capabilities, and W.P. Stewart's analyst coverage models/universes, as well as how W.P. Stewart constructs portfolios and measures performance attribution. On June 6, 2013, AllianceBernstein submitted to Mr. Phelps a nonbinding indication of interest outlining the terms for a potential acquisition of W.P. Stewart by AllianceBernstein. The indication of interest outlined two alternative transaction structures—a stock purchase transaction and an asset purchase transaction. The proposed stock purchase transaction contemplated cash consideration of $9.00 per share of W.P. Stewart common stock. Over the next week, Mr. Maquet and Mr. Bricker discussed the terms of the indication of interest by e-mail and by phone. In addition, Mr. Maquet held informal discussions with W.P. Stewart's board of directors and management regarding the proposed terms. As a result of these discussions, on June 20, 2013, AllianceBernstein submitted a revised nonbinding indication of interest proposing a merger transaction under which W.P. Stewart's stockholders would receive enhanced cash consideration of $11.00 per share, as well as a contingent value right payable in the amount of $3.00 per share if W.P. Stewart were to reach $5 billion in assets under management within three years after the closing of the merger.

        W.P. Stewart's board of directors discussed AllianceBernstein's proposal the following day. On June 25, 2013, in a follow-up to its June 21 meeting, W.P. Stewart's board of directors discussed this proposal and determined that management may move forward in negotiating a potential transaction with AllianceBernstein, but required enhanced consideration to what AllianceBernstein had previously offered. Later that day, AllianceBernstein orally indicated that it would be willing to increase its offer to $12.00 per share in cash plus a contingent value right payable with an additional $4.00 per share. For the next several weeks, Mr. Maquet, Mr. Bricker and Matthew Bass, Director of Business Management, Alternative Investments for AllianceBernstein, engaged in periodic discussions by phone regarding the proposed transaction, including structuring and due diligence considerations.

        Throughout this period, and continuing through July of 2013, members of AllianceBernstein's management team continued to conduct due diligence with respect to W.P. Stewart's business, including through in-person meetings with members of W.P. Stewart management and reviewing documents provided in W.P. Stewart's electronic data room. AllianceBernstein management also periodically updated the board of directors of the General Partner (as defined elsewhere in this document), on the results of its due diligence investigation.

        On July 8, 2013, AllianceBernstein submitted to W.P. Stewart a letter requesting exclusivity for 90 days, which W.P. Stewart determined not to sign at that time. On July 9, 2013, W.P. Stewart's board of directors held a meeting to discuss the terms of the transaction. On July 24, 2013, W.P. Stewart and Duff & Phelps entered into an engagement letter pursuant to which Duff & Phelps was engaged to provide an opinion to the board of directors of W.P. Stewart as to the fairness, from a financial point of


Table of Contents

view, to the holders of W.P. Stewart common stock of the merger consideration to be received by such stockholders in the proposed transaction (without giving effect to any impact of the proposed transaction on any particular stockholder other than in its capacity as a stockholder).

        Over the next several weeks, the parties continued to negotiate terms for a potential transaction. On July 22, 2013, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, counsel to AllianceBernstein ("Wachtell Lipton"), submitted to Nixon Peabody LLP ("Nixon Peabody") an initial draft of the definitive merger agreement for the transaction. That same day, the large investment advisory firm discussed above submitted a form of agreement proposing assignment of the mutual fund contract. After negotiations, on July 23, 2013, W.P. Stewart entered into a 30-day exclusivity agreement with AllianceBernstein with respect to the proposed transaction. Over the course of the next several days, Mr. Maquet, Mr. Pearlstein, Mr. Bricker, Mr. Bass, and Larry Cranch, General Counsel to AllianceBernstein, engaged in negotiations regarding the terms of these agreements. As a result of these negotiations, Nixon Peabody submitted W.P. Stewart's comments to the merger agreement on July 31, 2013.

        On August 2, 2013, Wachtell Lipton submitted AllianceBernstein's revised version of the merger agreement, as well as an initial draft of the CVR agreement. Over the next several days, the parties continued negotiations of the terms of both the merger agreement and of the CVR agreement. Although the parties had previously discussed the possibility of entering into employment agreements with certain members of W.P. Stewart's investment team, including Mr. Phelps and Mr. Tierney, to be effective as of the closing of the merger, during the course of negotiations Mr. Cranch and Mr. Bricker indicated to Mr. Pearlstein and Mr. Maquet that, as a condition to AllianceBernstein's obligation to consummate the merger, those employment agreements would need to remain in full force and effect and the individuals must not have given written indication of an intention to resign from W.P. Stewart. The parties also agreed that W.P. Stewart would enter into an agreement with William P. Stewart providing for his separation from W.P. Stewart on the earlier of the closing of the merger and the end of his existing term of employment on December 31, 2013, and that AllianceBernstein's obligation to close the merger would also be conditioned on such separation agreement remaining in full force and effect.

        On August 6, 2013, and over the course of the next week, Nixon Peabody and Wachtell Lipton exchanged multiple drafts of the merger agreement and the CVR agreement. Wachtell Lipton also provided an initial draft of the voting agreement that AllianceBernstein expected to be signed by W.P. Stewart's major stockholders. After further discussions, it was determined that Mr. Stewart would enter into a more limited voting agreement by which he would only be required to vote the shares over which he has sole voting authority, without an accompanying proxy. During this period, members of W.P. Stewart management, AllianceBernstein management, Nixon Peabody and Wachtell Lipton engaged in further oral negotiations regarding the terms of the transaction documents. In addition, legal counsel to W.P. Stewart held a call with Duff & Phelps regarding its ongoing analysis as to whether the merger consideration was fair to the W.P. Stewart stockholders. Members of W.P. Stewart's management teams also conducted phone calls with members of W.P. Stewart's board of directors for further input regarding the transaction terms.

        Drafts of the definitive transaction agreements, including the merger agreement, the form of CVR agreement and the voting agreements to be entered into with certain stockholders of W.P. Stewart, were substantially finalized by Nixon Peabody and Wachtell Lipton on August 14, 2013, and drafts and summaries of those agreements, along with financial information about W.P. Stewart, were distributed to the members of the W.P. Stewart board of directors.

        On August 15, 2013, the W.P. Stewart board of directors held a meeting at which representatives of Nixon Peabody and Duff & Phelps participated. The Nixon Peabody representatives referred the W.P. Stewart board to the draft definitive transaction agreements that had been distributed in advance of the meeting, and reviewed a summary of such agreements that had been sent to the W.P. Stewart


Table of Contents

board together with such materials. The Duff & Phelps representatives made a presentation to the W.P. Stewart board, provided its analysis as to whether the merger consideration to be received by the holders of W.P. Stewart common stock pursuant to the merger agreement was fair from a financial point of view, and expressed Duff & Phelps' oral opinion (subsequently confirmed by its written opinion dated August 15, 2013) that, as of August 15, 2013, and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in Duff & Phelps' written opinion, the merger consideration to be received by the holders of W.P. Stewart common stock pursuant to the merger agreement was fair from a financial point of view to such holders. The full text of the written opinion of Duff & Phelps, dated August 15, 2013, which sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations and qualifications of the review undertaken by Duff & Phelps in rendering its opinion, is attached hereto as Annex D. Following the presentations, and after further review and discussion, the W.P. Stewart board then adopted a set of resolutions relating to the transaction with AllianceBernstein including resolutions declaring that the merger agreement and the merger, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, are advisable and in the best interests of W.P. Stewart and its stockholders, approving the merger agreement and the merger, and recommending that W.P. Stewart stockholders adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger at a special meeting of W.P. Stewart's stockholders.

        Also on August 15, 2013, the board of directors of AllianceBernstein Corporation held a meeting during which members of AllianceBernstein's senior management team reviewed with the board the terms of the proposed merger agreement, CVR agreement, and other related transaction documents and adopted resolutions approving the merger agreement and the other related agreements to be entered into by AllianceBernstein.

        That afternoon, the definitive merger agreement was executed by W.P. Stewart, AllianceBernstein and Merger Sub, and voting agreements were executed by certain major stockholders of W.P. Stewart. AllianceBernstein also executed employment agreements with certain members of W.P. Stewart's investment team.


W.P. Stewart's Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of W.P. Stewart Board of Directors

        At a meeting of the W.P. Stewart board of directors on August 15, 2013, the members of the W.P. Stewart board of directors declared that the merger agreement and the merger, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the merger agreement, are advisable and in the best interests of W.P. Stewart and its stockholders. The W.P. Stewart board of directors has adopted the merger agreement and approved the merger, and recommends that W.P. Stewart stockholders adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger at the special meeting of W.P. Stewart's stockholders.

        In reaching its determinations to approve the merger agreement and recommend that W.P. Stewart stockholders adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger, the W.P. Stewart board of directors considered numerous factors discussed with W.P. Stewart's outside legal and financial advisors and senior management, including the following factors and benefits of the merger, each of which the W.P. Stewart board of directors believed supported its determinations:


Table of Contents


Table of Contents

        The W.P. Stewart board of directors also identified and considered a number of uncertainties, risks and other potentially negative factors, including the following:


Table of Contents

        The foregoing discussion of the factors considered by the W.P. Stewart board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather includes the material factors considered by the W.P. Stewart board of directors in its consideration of the merger agreement and the merger. After considering these


Table of Contents

factors, the W.P. Stewart board of directors concluded that the positive factors relating to the merger agreement and the merger outweighed the potential negative factors. In view of the wide variety of factors considered by the W.P. Stewart board of directors, and the complexity of these matters, the W.P. Stewart board of directors did not find it practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the foregoing factors. In addition, individual members of the W.P. Stewart board of directors may have assigned different weights to various factors. The W.P. Stewart board of directors approved and adopted and recommends the merger agreement and the merger based upon the totality of the information presented to and considered by it.


Opinion of W.P. Stewart's Financial Advisor

        On July 24, 2013, Duff & Phelps and W.P. Stewart entered into an engagement letter pursuant to which Duff & Phelps was engaged to provide an opinion to the board of directors of W.P. Stewart as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of W.P. Stewart common stock of the merger consideration to be received by such stockholders in the proposed transaction (without giving effect to any impact of the proposed transaction on any particular stockholder other than in its capacity as a stockholder). Duff & Phelps rendered its oral opinion to the board of directors of W.P. Stewart on August 15, 2013 (which was confirmed in writing by delivery of Duff & Phelps' written opinion dated August 15, 2013), that, subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limiting conditions set forth therein, as of such date, the merger consideration in the proposed transaction was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of W.P. Stewart common stock (without giving effect to any impact of the proposed transaction on any particular stockholder other than in its capacity as a stockholder).

        The full text of the written opinion of Duff & Phelps is attached as Annex D to this proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference. The full text of the written opinion should be read carefully in its entirety for a description of the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and qualifications and limitations of the review undertaken in rendering the opinion. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the written opinion.

        The opinion of Duff & Phelps was addressed to the board of directors, and given solely with respect to the proposed transaction. Duff & Phelps has not been requested to, and did not, (i) initiate any discussions with, or solicit any indications of interest from, third parties with respect to the proposed transaction, the assets, businesses or operations of W.P. Stewart, or any alternatives to the proposed transaction, (ii) negotiate or set the terms of the proposed transaction, and therefore, Duff & Phelps has assumed that such terms are the most beneficial terms, from W.P. Stewart's perspective, that could, under the circumstances, be negotiated among the parties to the merger agreement, the CVR agreement and the proposed transaction, or (iii) advise the board of directors or any other party with respect to alternatives to the proposed transaction.

        Duff & Phelps' opinion (i) does not address the relative merits of the underlying business decision to enter into the proposed transaction versus any alternative strategy, transaction or transaction structure; (ii) does not address any other transaction related to the proposed transaction; (iii) is not a recommendation as to how the board of directors or any stockholder should vote or act with respect to any matters relating to the proposed transaction, or whether to proceed with the proposed transaction or any related transaction, and (iv) does not indicate that the merger consideration received is the best possibly attainable under any circumstances. Instead, Duff & Phelps' opinion merely states whether the merger consideration in the proposed transaction is within a range suggested by certain financial analyses. The decision as to whether to proceed with the proposed transaction or any related transaction may depend on an assessment of factors unrelated to the financial analysis on which Duff & Phelps' opinion is based.


Table of Contents

        In connection with its opinion, Duff & Phelps made such reviews, analyses and inquiries as it deemed necessary and appropriate under the circumstances. Duff & Phelps also took into account its assessment of general economic, market and financial conditions, as well as its experience in securities and business valuation, in general, and with respect to similar transactions, in particular. Duff & Phelps' procedures, investigations, and financial analysis with respect to the preparation of its opinion included, but were not limited to, the items summarized below:

        In performing its analyses and rendering its opinion with respect to the proposed transaction, Duff & Phelps, with W.P. Stewart's consent:


Table of Contents

        To the extent that any of the foregoing assumptions or any of the facts on which its opinion are based prove to be untrue in any material respect, Duff & Phelps' opinion cannot and should not be relied upon. Furthermore, in Duff & Phelps' analysis and in connection with the preparation of its opinion, Duff & Phelps made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, market and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of W.P. Stewart or any other party involved in the proposed transaction.

        Duff & Phelps did not evaluate W.P. Stewart's solvency or conduct an independent appraisal or physical inspection of any specific assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise). Duff & Phelps did not express any opinion as to the market price or value of W.P. Stewart's common stock (or anything else) after the announcement or the consummation of the proposed transaction. Duff & Phelps' opinion should not be construed as a valuation opinion, credit rating, solvency opinion, or an analysis of W.P. Stewart's credit worthiness, as tax advice, or as accounting advice. Duff & Phelps did not make, and assumed no responsibility to make, any representation, or render any opinion, as to any legal matter. In rendering its opinion, Duff & Phelps did not express any opinion with respect to the amount or nature of any compensation to any of W.P. Stewart's officers, directors, or employees, or any class of such persons, relative to the merger consideration to be received by the stockholders of W.P. Stewart in the proposed transaction, or with respect to the fairness of any such compensation. The issuance of Duff & Phelps' opinion was approved by an authorized fairness opinion committee of Duff & Phelps.

        Although developments following the date of the Duff & Phelps opinion may affect the opinion, Duff & Phelps assumes no obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm its opinion. The Duff & Phelps opinion is necessarily based upon market, economic and other conditions that were in effect on, and information made available to Duff & Phelps as of, the date of the opinion. You should understand that developments subsequent to August 15, 2013 may affect the conclusion expressed in the Duff & Phelps opinion, and that Duff & Phelps disclaims any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any fact or matter affecting its opinion. The Duff & Phelps opinion is limited to the fairness as of August 15, 2013, from a financial point of view, of the merger consideration to be


Table of Contents

received by the stockholders of W.P. Stewart in the proposed transaction (without giving effect to any


Table of Contents

impact of the proposed transaction on any particular stockholder other than in its capacity as a stockholder).

        Summary of Financial Analyses by Duff & Phelps.    Set forth below is a summary of the material analyses performed by Duff & Phelps in connection with the delivery of its opinion to the board of directors of W.P. Stewart. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion, attached hereto as Annex D. While this summary describes the analyses and factors that Duff & Phelps deemed material in its presentation to the board of directors, it is not a comprehensive description of all analyses and factors considered by Duff & Phelps. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process that involves various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of these methods to the particular circumstances. Therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis. In arriving at its opinion, Duff & Phelps did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor considered by it, but rather made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor.Accordingly, Duff & Phelps believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and of the factors considered by it in rendering the fairness opinion without considering all analyses and factors could create a misleading or incomplete view of the evaluation process underlying its opinion. The conclusion reached by Duff & Phelps was based on all analyses and factors taken as a whole, and also on the application of Duff & Phelps' own experience and judgment.

        The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order for Duff & Phelps' financial analyses to be fully understood, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the data below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of Duff & Phelps' financial analyses.

        Discounted Cash Flow Analysis.    Duff & Phelps performed a discounted cash flow analysis of the projected free cash flows of W.P. Stewart, with free cash flow defined as cash that is available either to reinvest or to distribute to security holders. The discounted cash flow analysis determined the net present value of future free cash flows utilizing a weighted average cost of capital for the discount rate. The projected free cash flows were based on the management projections for 2013 through 2022.

        Duff & Phelps estimated the present value of all cash flows after 2022 (the "terminal value") of W.P. Stewart by applying a customary perpetuity formula using an 8.0% terminal growth rate. Duff & Phelps then assumed a 20.5% to 24.5% weighted average cost of capital to discount the projected free cash flows and terminal value. Duff & Phelps believes that the discount rate is equivalent to the rate of return that security holders could expect to realize on alternative investment opportunities with similar risk profiles.

        As a result of these assumptions, Duff & Phelps' discounted cash flow analysis indicated an estimated range of enterprise values for W.P. Stewart of $26.0 million to $38.0 million and a range of common stock values of W.P. Stewart, on a per share basis, of $10.01 to $12.46.

        Selected Public Company Analysis.    Duff & Phelps compared certain financial information of W.P. Stewart to corresponding data and ratios from similar asset management companies. For purposes of its analysis, Duff & Phelps used certain publicly available historical financial data and consensus equity analyst estimates for the selected publicly traded companies. This analysis produced valuation multiples of selected financial metrics which Duff & Phelps utilized to estimate the enterprise value of W.P. Stewart. The fourteen companies included in the selected public company analysis were:


Table of Contents

        Duff & Phelps selected these companies for its selected public company analysis based on its familiarity with companies in the asset management industry and their relative similarity, primarily in terms of business model, to that of W.P. Stewart. The selected companies generally provide investment management and related services to clients through products that include open-end and closed-end funds, institutional, high net-worth and separately managed accounts. The selected companies generally derive a significant portion of their revenues from fees paid by their clients based on a percentage of assets they manage. Employee compensation expense and marketing/distribution expenses are generally the most significant expenses for the selected companies. These attributes are generally similar to W.P. Stewart's business model. In selecting public companies, Duff & Phelps used multiple databases and other resources to identify companies that Duff & Phelps deemed to be the most similar to W.P. Stewart from an investment perspective. The companies selected by Duff & Phelps participate in the asset management industry and generally have similar business attributes, as discussed above, which would cause an investor to group these companies in the same broad industry class for investment purposes. No comparable public companies meeting the selection criteria were omitted.

        The table below reflects the observed trading multiples and the historical and projected financial performance, on an aggregate basis, of the peer group.

 
 Revenue Growth AUM 
 
 3-Yr
CAGR
 LTM 2013E 2014E YoY Growth Revenue/ Avg.
AUM
 

Minimum

  -19.5% -6.6% -14.3% -2.4% -13% 0.26%

Maximum

  29.0% 20.3% 21.1% 16.9% 35.0% 2.48%

Mean

  
8.0

%
 
8.5

%
 
8.2

%
 
8.2

%
 
13.2

%
 
0.78

%

Median

  10.8% 10.1% 11.8% 9.4% 13.1% 0.60%

W.P. Steward & Co. Ltd. 

  
6.2

%
 
43.8

%
 
16.8

%
 
29.5

%
 
34.8

%
 
0.94

%

 

 
 EBITDA Growth EBITDA Margin 
 
 3-Yr
CAGR
 LTM 2013E 2014E 3-Yr
Avg.
 LTM 2013E 2014E 

Minimum

  -35.6% -9.9% -14.7% 2.4% 18.0% 16.8% 19.1% 20.0%

Maximum

  53.4% 38.1% 37.3% 17.7% 72.5% 71.8% 68.8% 68.5%

Mean

  
9.9

%
 
11.4

%
 
12.0

%
 
11.4

%
 
34.6

%
 
34.5

%
 
35.0

%
 
35.9

%

Median

  12.8% 10.8% 15.5% 11.7% 33.0% 32.6% 32.6% 32.9%

W.P. Steward & Co. Ltd. 

  
NM
  
NM
  
NM
  
NM
  
NM
  
NM
  
NM
  
NM
 

Table of Contents

 
 Enterprise Value as a Multiple of 
 
 LTM
EBITDA
 2013E
EBITDA
 2014E
EBITDA
 LTM
Revenue
 2013E
Revenue
 AUM 

Minimum

  3.6x  4.2x  3.9x  0.94x  1.07x  0.43%

Maximum

  17.0x  15.5x  13.5x  6.51x  5.75x  3.94%

Mean

  
10.5x
  
9.8x
  
8.7x
  
3.65x
  
3.44x
  
2.15

%

Median

  10.5x  10.0x  9.0x  3.65x  3.49x  2.42%

LTM = Latest twelve months for which financial information was available

AUM = Assets under management

Enterprise Value = (Market Capitalization—Debt—Preferred Stock—Minority Interest)—(Cash & Equivalents)

EBITDA = Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization

CAGR = Compound annual growth rate

YoY = Year over year

Source: Bloomberg, Capital IQ SEC filings

        Duff & Phelps used the data above, in conjunction with data from its selected public company/M&A transaction analyses described below to reach certain valuation conclusions also described below.

        The companies utilized for comparative purposes in Duff & Phelps' analysis were not identical to W.P. Stewart. As a result, a complete valuation analysis cannot be limited to a quantitative review of the selected public companies, but also requires complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of such companies, as well as other factors that could affect their value relative to that of W.P. Stewart.

        Selected M&A Transactions Analysis.    Duff & Phelps compared W.P. Stewart to target companies involved in merger and acquisition transactions. Duff & Phelps selected 25 precedent transactions for purposes of its analysis, as shown in the table below. The selected M&A transactions indicated


Table of Contents

multiples of enterprise value to AUM ranging from 0.3% to 4.2% with a mean of 2.1% and a median of 1.6%.

Date Announced
 Acquirer Name Target Name
2/21/2013 Crestview Partners, L.P. Victory Capital Advisers, Inc. and Victory Capital Management Inc.

2/13/2013

 

Aberdeen Asset Management PLC

 

Artio Global Investors Inc.

12/18/2012

 

Management Buyout

 

Titanium Asset Management Corp.

12/6/2012

 

The Toronto-Dominion Bank

 

Epoch Investment Partners, Inc.

10/15/2012

 

The Charles Schwab Corporation

 

ThomasPartners, Inc.

7/8/2011

 

Apollo Global Management, LLC

 

Gulf Stream Asset Management, LLC

12/21/2010

 

Deerfield Capital Corp.

 

CIFC Investment Management LLC

10/18/2010

 

Royal Bank of Canada

 

BlueBay Asset Management plc

9/22/2010

 

Westwood Trust

 

McCarthy Group Advisors, LLC

8/30/2010

 

The Charles Schwab Corporation

 

Windward Investment Management, Inc.

3/30/2010

 

Investec plc

 

Rensburg plc

12/20/2009

 

Piper Jaffray Companies

 

Advisory Research, Inc.

12/12/2009

 

Affiliated Managers Group Inc.

 

Highbury Financial Inc.

8/10/2009

 

Highbury Financial Inc.

 

Aston Asset Management LLC

11/12/2008

 

Management Buyout

 

Loring Ward International Ltd.

11/7/2008

 

Titanium Asset Management Corp.

 

Boyd Watterson Asset Management, LLC

9/23/2008

 

Banca Popolare di Milano Scarl

 

Anima S.G.R.p.A

9/17/2008

 

Brickworks Investment Co. Ltd.

 

Huntley Investment Co., Ltd.

9/12/2008

 

Federated Investors, Inc.

 

Clover Capital Management, Inc.

4/16/2008

 

TPG Capital, L.P.; Pharos Capital Group, LLC

 

American Beacon Advisors, Inc.

2/28/2008

 

Titanium Asset Management Corp.

 

National Investment Services, Inc.

10/23/2007

 

UBS Global Asset Management (France) SA

 

Caisse Centrale de Réescompte

9/5/2007

 

Titanium Asset Management Corp.

 

Wood Asset Management Inc

7/16/2007

 

Electra Private Equity Plc; Electra Partners LLP

 

Premier Asset Management plc

6/19/2007

 

DLJ Merchant Banking Partners; Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC

 

Nuveen Investments, Inc.

Source: Capital IQ, SEC filings, and company press releases


Table of Contents

        Duff & Phelps used multiple databases and resources to identify precedent transactions involving companies in the asset management industry. Duff & Phelps identified relevant transactions that were announced since 2007, and for which adequate information was available to derive meaningful valuation multiples. No transactions meeting the selection criteria were omitted.

        Summary of Selected Public Company / M&A Transaction Analyses.    In order to estimate a range of enterprise values for W.P. Stewart, Duff & Phelps selected and applied valuation multiples of enterprise value to AUM ranging from 1.25% to 1.75% based on the historical and projected financial performance of W.P. Stewart as compared to the selected public companies and the target companies in the M&A transactions. As a result of these selected valuation multiples, the selected public company / M&A transaction analyses indicated an estimated range of enterprise values for W.P. Stewart of $24.5 million to $34.5 million and a range of common stock values of W.P. Stewart, on a per share basis, of $9.71 to $11.76.

        Summary of Premiums Paid Analysis.    Duff & Phelps observed the premium over the public market trading price paid by an acquirer in change of control merger and acquisition transactions. The Premiums Paid Analysis is supplementary only. Duff & Phelps did not explicitly estimate the value of W.P. Stewart based on this analysis. The subset of transactions analyzed by Duff & Phelps included transactions announced after July 2010 involving (i) target companies in the financial services industry, (ii) target companies in the U.S. with enterprise values between $25 million and $100 million and (iii) target companies in the U.S. with enterprise values between $25 million and $1 billion. The median premiums, as a percent above the stock price one-day, one-week, and one-month prior to the announcement of the transaction were (x) 29.1%, 28.6% and 31.8%, respectively, for (i) above, (y) 45.0%, 46.9% and 43.7%, respectively, for (ii) above, and (z) 35.5%, 37.2% and 38.1%, respectively, for (iii) above. Duff & Phelps noted that $12.00 per share ($16.00 per share with a maximum CVR payout) offer in the proposed transaction implies a 65.7% (121.0% with a maximum CVR payout) premium above W.P. Stewart's common stock closing price of $7.24 per share on August 15, 2013, the last trading day immediately prior to the announcement of the transaction.

        Summary of Analyses.    The range of enterprise values for W.P. Stewart that Duff & Phelps derived from its discounted cash flow analysis was $26.0 million to $38.0 million, and the range of enterprise values that Duff & Phelps derived from its selected public company / M&A transaction analysis was $24.5 million to $34.5 million, resulting in a concluded enterprise value range of $25.5 million to $36.5 million.

        Based on the concluded enterprise value, Duff & Phelps estimated the range of aggregate common equity value of W.P. Stewart to be $49.1 million to $60.3 million by:

        Based on the foregoing analysis, Duff & Phelps estimated the value per share of W.P. Stewart's common stock to be in the range of $9.91 to $12.16. Duff & Phelps noted that the $12.00 per share ($16.00 per share with a maximum CVR payout) value of common stock of W.P. Stewart implied by the proposed transaction was near the high end of the range (above the range with a maximum CVR payout) of the per share value indicated by its analysis.


Table of Contents

        Duff & Phelps' opinion and financial analyses were only one of the many factors considered by W.P. Stewart's board of directors in its evaluation of the proposed transaction and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of W.P. Stewart's board of directors.

        Miscellaneous.    The board of directors selected Duff & Phelps because Duff & Phelps is a leading independent financial advisory firm, offering a broad range of valuation and investment banking services, including fairness and solvency opinions, mergers and acquisitions advisory, mergers and acquisitions due diligence services, financial reporting and tax valuation, fixed asset and real estate consulting, ESOP and ERISA advisory services, legal business solutions and dispute consulting. Duff & Phelps is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and securities in the preparation of fairness opinions in connection with mergers, acquisitions and other strategic transactions.

        Fees and Expenses.    As compensation for its services in connection with the proposed transaction, W.P. Stewart has agreed to pay Duff & Phelps $200,000 due and payable as follows: $100,000 in cash upon execution of the engagement letter to serve as financial advisor to W.P. Stewart's board of directors in its review of the proposed transaction; and the remaining $100,000 in cash upon Duff & Phelps' delivery of its opinion. No portion of Duff & Phelps' fee is contingent upon either the conclusion expressed in the opinion or whether the proposed transaction is successfully consummated. Furthermore, Duff & Phelps is entitled to be paid additional fees at Duff & Phelps' standard hourly rates for any time incurred should Duff & Phelps be called upon to support its findings subsequent to the delivery of the fairness opinion and/or to assist in the preparation or review of relevant sections of required Securities and Exchange Commission disclosures, proxy materials, information statements or other documents associated with the proposed transaction. W.P. Stewart has also agreed to reimburse Duff & Phelps for its out-of-pocket expenses and reasonable fees and expenses of counsel retained by Duff & Phelps, incurred in connection with the engagement. W.P. Stewart has agreed to indemnify and hold harmless Duff & Phelps and its affiliates and any other person, director, employee or agent of Duff & Phelps or any of its affiliates, or any person controlling Duff & Phelps or its affiliates, for certain losses, claims, damages, expenses and liabilities relating to or arising out of services provided by Duff & Phelps as financial advisor to the board of directors. The terms of the fee arrangement with Duff & Phelps, which W.P. Stewart and Duff & Phelps believe are customary in transactions of this nature, were negotiated at arm's length between W.P. Stewart and Duff & Phelps, and the board of directors is aware of these fee arrangements.

        During the two years preceding the date of Duff & Phelps' fairness opinion, Duff & Phelps has provided valuation advisory services for transfer pricing purposes to AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.  For these engagements, Duff & Phelps received customary fees, expense reimbursement and indemnification.


AllianceBernstein's Reasons for the Merger

        In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement and the merger, the general partner of AllianceBernstein and its board of directors considered numerous factors discussed with AllianceBernstein's senior management, including the following:


Table of Contents

        The foregoing discussion of the factors considered by the general partner of AllianceBernstein and its board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive but, rather, includes the material factors considered. After considering these factors, the general partner of AllianceBernstein and its board of directors concluded that the positive factors relating to the merger agreement and the merger outweighed the potential negative factors. In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement, the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, the general partner of AllianceBernstein and its board of directors did not quantify or assign any relative weights to the factors considered, and individual directors may have given different weights to different factors. The general partner of AllianceBernstein and its board of directors considered all these factors as a whole, including discussions with, and questioning of, AllianceBernstein's management and advisors, and overall considered the factors to be favorable to, and to support, their determination.


Interests of W.P. Stewart's Executive Officers and Directors in the Merger

        In considering the recommendation of W.P. Stewart's board of directors that you vote to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger, you should be aware that some of W.P. Stewart's executive


Table of Contents

officers and directors may have economic interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, those of W.P. Stewart's stockholders generally. W.P. Stewart's board of directors was aware of and considered these interests, among other matters, in reaching its determination that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, are advisable for, and in the best interests of, W.P. Stewart and its stockholders, in approving the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, and in making its recommendation that W.P. Stewart's stockholders vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement. These interests include the following:


Table of Contents

        Certain of W.P. Stewart's directors and affiliates of certain of W.P. Stewart's directors have entered into voting agreements with AllianceBernstein which require them to vote in favor of the merger agreement and the merger. Please see "Certain Terms of the Merger Agreement—Voting Agreements" beginning on page [                        ] of this proxy statement/prospectus and "Certain Terms of the Merger Agreement—William P. Stewart Voting Agreement" beginning on page [                        ] of this proxy statement/prospectus.

        W.P. Stewart's Directors and Officers After Completion of the Merger.    At and immediately after the effective time of the merger, the directors of the surviving entity will consist of the directors of Merger Sub in office immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, until their respective successors are duly elected or appointed and qualified or their earlier death, resignation or removal. The officers of W.P. Stewart immediately prior to the closing date of the merger will be the initial officers of the surviving entity and will hold office until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified, or their earlier death, resignation or removal.


Regulatory Filings and Approvals Required to Complete the Merger

        Under the HSR Act and related rules, certain transactions, including the merger, may not be completed until notifications have been given and information furnished to the Antitrust Division and the FTC and all statutory waiting period requirements have been satisfied. On September 12, 2013, both AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart filed their respective notifications under the HSR Act with the Antitrust Division and the FTC. As a result, assuming the notifications are deemed complete,FTC, and the required waiting period will expireexpired on October 14, 2013, unless earlier terminated or extended by a request for additional information.15, 2013. The consummation of the merger isremains conditioned on the expiration or early termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act and the receipt of all other necessary regulatory approvals, which approvals must remain in full force and effect at the effective time of the merger.

        At any time before or after the expiration of the statutory waiting periodsperiod under the HSR Act, or before or after the effective time, the Antitrust Division or the FTC may take action under the antitrust laws, including seeking to enjoin the completion of the merger, to rescind the merger or to conditionally approve the merger upon the divestiture of assets of AllianceBernstein or W.P. Stewart or subject to regulatory conditions or other remedies. In addition, state attorneys general could take action under the antitrust laws as they deem necessary or desirable in the public interest, including, without limitation, seeking to enjoin the completion of the merger or permitting completion subject to regulatory conditions. Private parties may also seek to take legal action under the antitrust laws under some circumstances. Although neither AllianceBernstein nor W.P. Stewart believes that the merger will violate federal antitrust laws, there can be no assurance that a challenge to the merger on antitrust grounds will not be made or, if such a challenge is made, that it would not be successful.


Table of Contents

        Certain additional filings may be made by AllianceBernstein or W.P. Stewart in connection with the merger, including in certain foreign jurisdictions.


Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger

        The following is a general discussion of the material (1) United States federal income tax consequences of the merger to U.S. Holders (as defined below) who receive the merger consideration in exchange for their shares of W.P. Stewart common stock in the merger and (2) United States federal income tax considerations relating to the ownership and disposition of CVRs received by U.S. Holders in exchange for their shares of W.P. Stewart common stock in the merger. This discussion does not apply to W.P. Stewart stockholders who are not U.S. Holders. In addition, this discussion does not apply to any W.P. Stewart stockholders who exercise appraisal or dissenter's rights under Delaware law. This discussion applies only to U.S. Holders who hold their shares of W.P. Stewart common stock and/or who will acquire CVRs pursuant to the merger, as applicable, as "capital assets" within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code (generally, property held for investment). This discussion does not address any tax consequences to subsequent purchasers of CVRs. This discussion is based on current provisions of the Code, the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder (which we refer to as the "Treasury Regulations"), judicial interpretations thereof and administrative rulings and published positions of the Internal Revenue Service (which we refer to as the "IRS"), all as in effect as of the date hereof, and all of which are subject to change or different interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect, and any such change may affect the accuracy of the statements and conclusions set forth herein. This discussion is not binding on the IRS or the courts and, therefore, could be subject to challenge, which could be sustained. No ruling is intended to be sought from the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the merger or with respect to the federal income tax treatment of the CVRs issued in the merger.

        This discussion is for general information only and does not purport to consider all aspects of United States federal income taxation that might be relevant to particular W.P. Stewart stockholders in light of their particular circumstances and does not apply to W.P. Stewart stockholders subject to special rules under the United States income tax laws (including, for example, banks or other financial institutions, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, persons who hold shares of W.P. Stewart common stock or CVRs as part of a hedge, straddle, constructive sale, conversion transaction or other integrated investment, persons who acquired shares of W.P. Stewart common stock or CVRs under a stock incentive plan, pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation, partnerships or other entities or arrangements treated as partnerships or pass-through entities for United States federal income tax purposes (or investors therein), real estate investment trusts, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, dealers in securities or currencies, traders in securities who elect to apply a mark-to-market method of accounting, and U.S. Holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar). This discussion does not address any tax consequences arising under the unearned income Medicare contribution tax pursuant to the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, nor does it address any tax considerations under state, local or foreign laws or United States federal laws other than those pertaining to the United States federal income tax.

        If an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for United States federal income tax purposes holds shares of W.P. Stewart common stock or CVRs, the tax treatment of a partner in such partnership will generally depend on the status of the partners and the activities of the partnership. Holders of shares of W.P. Stewart common stock or CVRs that are partnerships (or entities or arrangements treated as partnerships for United States federal income tax purposes) or persons treated as partners in such partnerships (or entities or arrangements) for United States federal income tax purposes should consult their own tax advisors regarding the United States federal income tax consequences to them of the merger and the ownership and disposition of CVRs.

        W.P. Stewart stockholders should consult their own tax advisors to determine the particular tax consequences to them of the merger and the ownership and disposition of CVRs received in the


Table of Contents

merger, including the applicability and effect of the alternative minimum tax, and any state, local, foreign or other tax laws and changes in such laws.

        As used herein, the term "U.S. Holder" means a beneficial owner of shares of W.P. Stewart common stock or CVRs received in the merger that is, for United States federal income tax purposes:

        The exchange of shares of W.P. Stewart common stock by a U.S. Holder for cash and CVRs pursuant to the merger will be a taxable transaction for United States federal income tax purposes. In general, a U.S. Holder of shares of W.P. Stewart common stock will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference, if any, between (1) the sum of the amount of cash and the fair market value of the CVRs received by such U.S. Holder in exchange for such shares of W.P. Stewart common stock and (2) such U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in such shares of W.P. Stewart common stock. Such gain or loss generally will be long-term capital gain or loss provided that such U.S. Holder's holding period for such shares of W.P. Stewart common stock is more than one year at the time of consummation of the merger. If a U.S. Holder acquired different blocks of W.P. Stewart common stock at different times and different prices, such U.S. Holder must determine its adjusted tax basis and holding period separately with respect to each block of W.P. Stewart common stock.

        Long-term capital gains of certain non-corporate holders, including individuals, generally are eligible for United States federal income taxation at preferential rates. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. The installment method of reporting any gain attributable to receipt of a CVR will not be available because shares of W.P. Stewart common stock are traded on an established securities market.

        A U.S. Holder's initial tax basis in a CVR received in the merger will equal the fair market value of such CVR as determined for United States federal income tax purposes, and the holding period for such CVR will begin on the day following the date of the consummation of the merger.

        There is no legal authority directly addressing the United States federal income tax treatment of the CVRs. Accordingly, the amount, timing and character of any gain, income or loss with respect to the CVRs are uncertain. For example, it is possible that payments received with respect to a CVR, up to the amount of the U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in the CVR, may be treated as a non-taxable return of such U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in the CVR, with any amount received in excess of such basis treated as gain from the disposition of the CVR, or possibly another method of basis recovery may apply. Further, it is not clear whether payments made with respect to a CVR may be treated as payments with respect to a sale or exchange of a capital asset or as giving rise to ordinary income. A U.S. Holder who does not sell, exchange or otherwise dispose of a CVR may not be able to recognize a loss with respect to the CVR until the U.S. Holder's right to receive CVR payments terminates.

        Although not entirely clear, a portion of any payment due more than six months following the consummation of the merger with respect to a CVR may constitute imputed interest taxable as ordinary income under Section 483 of the Code, and AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart have agreed


Table of Contents

to determine imputed interest, if any, in accordance with Section 483 of the Code. The portion of any CVR payment treated as imputed interest under Section 483 of the Code generally should equal the excess of the amount of the CVR payment over the present value of such amount as of the consummation of the merger calculated using the applicable federal rate as the discount rate. A U.S. Holder of a CVR must include in its taxable income interest imputed pursuant to Section 483 of the Code using such U.S. Holder's regular method of accounting.

        Upon a sale or other taxable disposition of a CVR, a U.S. Holder generally should recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between (1) the sum of the amount of any cash and the fair market value of any property received upon such sale or other taxable disposition (less any imputed interest, as described below) and (2) such U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in the CVR. Such gain or loss generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder has held the CVR for more than one year at the time of such sale or other taxable disposition. Although not entirely clear, it is possible that a portion of the amount received by a U.S. Holder upon the sale or other disposition of a CVR may be treated as imputed interest income, determined under the method described above.

The United States federal income tax treatment of the CVRs is not certain. Neither AllianceBernstein nor W.P. Stewart intends to seek a ruling from the IRS regarding the tax treatment of the CVRs and it is possible that the IRS might successfully assert that payments with respect to, or sales or other dispositions of, the CVRs should be treated differently than described above. If the IRS were to so successfully assert, the amount, timing and character of income, gain or loss realized with respect to the CVRs may be materially different than described above. W.P. Stewart stockholders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the recognition of income, gain or loss, if any, resulting from the receipt of payments, if any, with respect to, and sales or other dispositions of, the CVRs.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

        Under current United States federal income tax laws, any payments (including the CVRs) made to a U.S. Holder in exchange for its shares of W.P. Stewart common stock pursuant to the merger may be subject, under certain circumstances, to information reporting and backup withholding (currently at a rate of 28%). In addition, any payments made to a U.S. Holder with respect to a CVR received pursuant to the merger may be subject, under certain circumstances, to information reporting and backup withholding. To avoid backup withholding, each U.S. Holder receiving cash and CVRs in exchange for such U.S. Holder's shares of W.P. Stewart common stock pursuant to the merger must provide the exchange agent (or other applicable withholding agent) with a properly completed IRS Form W-9, signed under penalties of perjury, providing such U.S. Holder's taxpayer identification number ("TIN") and certifying that such U.S. Holder is a U.S. person, the TIN provided is correct and such U.S. Holder is not subject to backup withholding. Certain U.S. Holders (including corporations) are exempt from backup withholding. Such U.S. Holders should indicate their exempt status on a properly completed IRS Form W-9. If a U.S. Holder does not provide its correct TIN or fails to provide the certifications described above or otherwise establish an exemption, the IRS may impose a penalty on such U.S. Holder and payments to such U.S. Holder of the merger consideration or with respect to CVRs may be subject to backup withholding.

        Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against a U.S. Holder's United States federal income tax liability provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.


Anticipated Accounting Treatment

        The accounting principles applicable to this transaction as described in FASB ASC 805-10-05-01 provide transactions that represent business combinations are to be accounted for under the acquisition method. The acquisition method requires all of the following steps: (a) identifying the acquirer;


Table of Contents

(b) determining the acquisition date; (c) recognizing and measuring the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; and (d) recognizing and measuring goodwill or a gain from a bargain purchase.

        The appropriate accounting treatment for this transaction is as a business combination under the acquisition method. On the acquisition date, as defined by ASC 805, AllianceBernstein (the acquirer) will record at fair value the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest, and goodwill (or a gain from a bargain purchase). The results of operations for the combined company will be reported prospectively subsequent to the acquisition date.


Public Trading Markets

        The common stock of W.P. Stewart is traded in the Pink Sheets under the symbol "WPSL." There is currently no public market for the CVRs. Upon completion of the merger, W.P. Stewart common stock will no longer be traded in the Pink Sheets. There can be no assurances as to whether an active public market for the CVRs will develop following the merger.


Appraisal Rights of Dissenting W.P. Stewart Stockholders

        Under Delaware law, holders of W.P. Stewart common stock are entitled to dissenters' rights of appraisal in connection with the merger, provided that such holders meet all of the conditions set forth in Section 262 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, referred to as Section 262. Pursuant to Section 262, W.P. Stewart stockholders who do not vote in favor of the merger and who comply with the applicable requirements of Section 262 will have the right to seek appraisal of the fair value of such shares as determined by the Delaware Chancery Court if the merger is completed. It is possible that the fair value as determined by the Court may be more or less than, or the same as, the merger consideration. Stockholders should note that investment banking opinions as to the fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration payable in a sale transaction, such as the merger, are not opinions as to, and do not in any manner address, fair value under the DGCL.

        W.P. Stewart stockholders electing to exercise appraisal rights must comply with the strict procedures set forth in Section 262 in order to demand and perfect their rights. ANY W.P. STEWART STOCKHOLDER WISHING TO PRESERVE THEIR RIGHTS TO APPRAISAL MUST MAKE A DEMAND FOR APPRAISAL AS DESCRIBED BELOW.

        The following is intended as a brief summary of the material provisions of Section 262 required to be followed by dissenting W.P. Stewart stockholders wishing to demand and perfect their appraisal rights. This summary, however, is not a complete statement of all applicable requirements and is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to Section 262, the full text of which appears in Annex C to this proxy statement/prospectus.

        Under Section 262, W.P. Stewart is required to notify stockholders not less than 20 days before the special meeting to vote on the merger that appraisal rights will be available. A copy of Section 262 must be included with that notice.

        THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS CONSTITUTES W.P. STEWART'S NOTICE TO ITS STOCKHOLDERS OF THE AVAILABILITY OF APPRAISAL RIGHTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MERGER UNDER SECTION 262 OF THE DELAWARE GENERAL CORPORATION LAW.

        If you wish to consider exercising your appraisal rights, you should carefully review the text of Section 262 set forth in Annex C to this proxy statement/prospectus and consult your legal advisor. If you fail to timely and properly comply with the requirements of Section 262, your appraisal rights may


Table of Contents

be lost. To exercise appraisal rights with respect to your shares of W.P. Stewart common stock, you must:

        If you sign and return a proxy card that does not contain voting instructions, you will effectively waive your appraisal rights because such shares represented by the proxy will, unless the proxy is revoked, be voted for the adoption of the merger agreement. Therefore, a stockholder who submits a proxy and who wishes to exercise appraisal rights must submit a proxy containing instructions to vote against the adoption of the merger agreement or abstain from voting on the adoption of the merger agreement.

        Only a holder of record of shares of W.P. Stewart common stock, or a person duly authorized and explicitly purporting to act on that stockholder's behalf, is entitled to assert appraisal rights for the shares of common stock registered in that stockholder's name. A demand for appraisal must be executed by or on behalf of the stockholder of record, fully and correctly, as such stockholder's name appears on their stock certificates, and must state that such person intends thereby to demand appraisal of his or her shares of W.P. Stewart common stock in connection with the merger. Beneficial owners who do not also hold the shares of record may not directly make appraisal demands to W.P. Stewart. The beneficial owner must, in such cases, have the registered stockholder submit the required demand in respect of those shares.

        If the shares of W.P. Stewart common stock are owned of record in a fiduciary capacity, such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, execution of the demand must be made in that capacity, and if the shares of W.P. Stewart common stock are owned of record by more than one person, as in a joint tenancy and tenancy in common, the demand must be executed by or on behalf of all joint owners. An authorized agent, including an agent for two or more joint owners, may execute a demand for appraisal on behalf of a holder of record; however, the agent must identify the record owner or owners and expressly disclose the fact that, in executing the demand, the agent is acting as agent for such owner or owners. Stockholders who hold their shares of W.P. Stewart common stock in brokerage accounts or other nominee forms and who wish to exercise appraisal rights are urged to consult with their brokers to determine the appropriate procedures for the making of a demand for appraisal by such a nominee.

        Failure to strictly follow the procedures set forth in Section 262 may result in the loss, termination or waiver of appraisal rights. Stockholders who vote in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement will not have a right to have the fair market value of their shares of W.P. Stewart common stock determined. However, failure to vote in favor of the merger agreement is not sufficient to perfect appraisal rights. If you desire to exercise your appraisal rights, you must also submit to W.P. Stewart a written demand for payment of the fair value of the W.P. Stewart common stock held by you.

Written Demand and Notice

        A written demand for appraisal should be filed with W.P. Stewart before the W.P. Stewart special meeting. The demand notice shall be sufficient if it reasonably informs W.P. Stewart of your identity and that you wish to seek appraisal with respect to your shares of W.P. Stewart common stock. All


Table of Contents

demands should be delivered to: W.P. Stewart & Co., Inc., 527 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, New York 10022, Attention: General Counsel.

        The combined company, within 10 days after the effective date of the merger, will notify each stockholder who has complied with Section 262 and who has not voted in favor of the merger, that the merger has become effective.

Judicial Appraisal

        Within 120 days after the effective time, the combined company or any stockholder who is entitled to appraisal rights and has otherwise complied with Section 262 may file a petition with the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the value of the common stock of W.P. Stewart held by all such stockholders. The combined company is under no obligation to and has no present intention to file a petition and holders should not assume that the combined company will file a petition. Accordingly, it is the obligation of the holders of common stock to initiate all necessary action to perfect their appraisal rights within the time prescribed in Section 262. At the hearing on the petition, the court shall determine which stockholders are entitled to an appraisal of their shares and may require the stockholders who have demanded appraisal submit their certificates to the Register in Chancery so an appropriate legend can be placed on them. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in the dismissal of the appraisal proceedings with respect to you.

        After the Delaware Court of Chancery determines the holders of common stock entitled to appraisal, the appraisal proceeding shall be conducted in accordance with the rules of the Delaware Court of Chancery, including any rules specifically governing appraisal proceedings. Through this proceeding, the Delaware Court of Chancery shall determine the fair value of the shares, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, together with interest, to be paid, if any, upon the amount determined to be "fair value" in an appraisal proceeding. In determining the fair value of the shares the Delaware Court of Chancery will take into account all relevant factors. InWeinberger v.UOP,  Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court discussed the factors that could be considered in determining fair value in an appraisal proceeding, stating that "proof of value by any techniques or methods that are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court" should be considered, and that "fair price obviously requires consideration of all relevant factors involving the value of a company." The Delaware Supreme Court stated that, in making this determination of fair value, the court must consider market value, asset value, dividends, earnings prospects, the nature of the enterprise and any other facts that could be ascertained as of the date of the merger that throw any light on future prospects of the corporation. Section 262 provides that fair value is to be "exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger." InCede & Co. v.Technicolor, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court stated that such exclusion is a "narrow exclusion [that] does not encompass known elements of value," but which rather applies only to the speculative elements of value arising from such accomplishment or expectation. InWeinberger, the Delaware Supreme Court also stated that "elements of future value, including the nature of the enterprise, which are known or susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the product of speculation, may be considered." Unless the Delaware Court of Chancery in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the effective time through the date of payment of the judgment shall be compounded quarterly and shall accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharges) as established from time to time during the period between the effective time and the date of payment of the judgment.

        Stockholders who consider seeking appraisal should consider that the fair value of their shares under Section 262 could be more than, the same as, or less than, the value of the consideration provided for in the merger agreement without the exercise of appraisal rights. No representation is made as to the outcome of the appraisal of fair value as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery. Delaware courts have decided that the statutory appraisal remedy, depending on factual


Table of Contents

circumstances, may or may not be a dissenter's exclusive remedy. The Court of Chancery may determine the cost of the appraisal proceeding and assess it against the parties as the Court deems equitable. Upon application of a dissenting stockholder, the Court may order that all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any dissenting stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and the fees and expenses of experts, be charged pro rata against the value of all shares of W.P. Stewart common stock entitled to appraisal. In the absence of a court determination or assessment, each party will bear its own expenses.

        Any stockholder who has demanded appraisal in compliance with Section 262 will not, after the effective time, be entitled to vote such stock for any purpose or receive payment of dividends or other distributions, if any, on the W.P. Stewart common stock, except for dividends or distributions, if any, payable to stockholders of record at a date before the merger.

Request for Appraisal Data

        If you submit a written demand for appraisal of your shares of W.P. Stewart common stock and otherwise properly perfect your appraisal rights, you may, upon written request mailed to the combined company within 120 days after the effective time, receive a written statement identifying (1) the aggregate number of shares of W.P. Stewart common stock which were not voted in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement and with respect to which W.P. Stewart has received written demands for appraisal; and (2) the aggregate number of holders of such shares. The combined company will mail this statement to you within 10 days after receiving your written request. If no petition is filed by either the combined company or any dissenting stockholder within the 120-day period, the rights of all dissenting stockholders to appraisal will cease. Stockholders seeking to exercise appraisal rights should not assume that the combined company will file a petition with respect to the appraisal of the fair value of their shares or that the combined company will initiate any negotiations with respect to the fair value of those shares. The combined company will be under no obligation to take any action in this regard and AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart have no present intention to do so. Accordingly, it is the obligation of stockholders who wish to seek appraisal of their shares of W.P. Stewart common stock to initiate all necessary action with respect to the perfection of their appraisal rights within the time periods and in the manner prescribed in Section 262. Failure to file the petition on a timely basis will cause the stockholder's right to an appraisal to cease.

Withdrawal

        Even if you submit a written demand for appraisal of your shares of W.P. Stewart common stock and otherwise properly perfect your appraisal rights, you may withdraw your demand at any time after the effective time, except that any such attempt to withdraw made more than 60 days after the effective time will require the written approval of the combined company and, once a petition for appraisal is filed, the appraisal proceeding may not be dismissed as to any holder absent court approval. The foregoing, however, will not affect the right of any stockholder who has not commenced an appraisal proceeding or joined that proceeding as a named party to withdraw such stockholder's demand for appraisal and to accept the terms offered under the merger agreement within 60 days after the effective time. If you withdraw your demand, you will be deemed to have accepted the terms of the merger agreement, which terms are summarized in this proxy statement/prospectus and which merger agreement is attached in its entirety as Annex A.

        The foregoing summary is not intended to be a complete statement of the procedures for exercising appraisal rights under Section 262 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Section 262, a copy of which is attached as Annex C to this proxy statement/prospectus. W.P. Stewart urges any stockholder wishing to exercise appraisal rights, if any, to read this summary and Section 262 carefully, and to consult legal counsel before attempting to exercise appraisal rights. Failure to comply strictly with all of the procedures set forth in Section 262 may result in the loss of your statutory appraisal rights.


Table of Contents


CERTAIN TERMS OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT

        The following description of the merger agreement describes the material terms of the merger agreement, the CVR agreement, and other transaction documents. The full text of the merger agreement and the form of CVR agreement are attached as Annex A and Annex B to this proxy statement/prospectus and are incorporated herein by reference. W.P. Stewart stockholders are encouraged to read the entire merger agreement, CVR agreement and the other annexes to this proxy statement/prospectus as the rights and obligations of the parties thereto are governed by the express terms of the merger agreement and the CVR agreement and not by this summary or any other information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus.

        The merger agreement, the CVR agreement and the other annexes attached to this proxy statement/prospectus were included to provide investors and security holders with information regarding their respective terms. These agreements are not intended to provide any other factual information about W.P. Stewart or AllianceBernstein. The merger agreement and the form of CVR agreement attached as annexes to this proxy statement/prospectus contain representations, warranties and covenants that the parties thereto made to, and solely for the benefit of, each other, and such representations, warranties and covenants may be subject to standards of materiality applicable to the contracting parties that differ from those applicable to investors, and may be subject to limitations agreed upon by the contracting parties, including being qualified by confidential disclosures made for the purposes of allocating contractual risk between the parties to the merger agreement instead of establishing these matters as facts. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations, warranties and covenants may change after the date of the merger agreement which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in the parties' public disclosures.


The Merger

        At the effective time of the merger, Merger Sub will merge with and into W.P. Stewart and the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub will cease. W.P. Stewart will be the surviving corporation in the merger and will continue its corporate existence as a Delaware corporation after the merger.

        The certificate of incorporation of the surviving corporation at the effective time of the merger will be as set forth in Exhibit A to the merger agreement until subsequently amended in accordance with its terms and the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL. The bylaws of Merger Sub in effect immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will be the bylaws of the surviving corporation until subsequently amended in accordance with their terms and the DGCL.


Effective Time of the Merger

        The closing of the merger will take place at the offices of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz at 10:00 a.m., New York City time, on the date that is the third business day after all of the conditions stated in the merger agreement have been fulfilled or waived (other than those conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied at the closing, but subject to the fulfillment or waiver of those conditions), or on such other date as W.P. Stewart and AllianceBernstein may agree.

        The merger will become effective at the time, which we refer to as the "effective time" of the merger, when a certificate of merger is properly filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware or at such later date or time as the parties may agree and as is set forth in the certificate of merger.


Manner and Basis of Converting Shares

        The merger agreement provides that, at the effective time of the merger, each share of W.P. Stewart common stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective time (other than shares held by W.P. Stewart, AllianceBernstein, Merger Sub, or any of their direct or indirect wholly owned


Table of Contents

subsidiaries (other than shares held in trust accounts, managed accounts, mutual funds and the like, or otherwise held in a fiduciary or agency capacity, that are beneficially owned by third parties) and shares for which appraisal rights have been properly demanded under Delaware law) will automatically be converted into the right to receive:

        The cash consideration and the contingent value rights are collectively referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus as the merger consideration.

        At the effective time of the merger, each share of W.P. Stewart common stock held by W.P. Stewart as treasury stock and each share owned directly by AllianceBernstein or Merger Sub (other than shares held in trust accounts, managed accounts, mutual funds and the like, or otherwise held in a fiduciary or agency capacity, that are beneficially owned by third parties) immediately prior to the effective time will be cancelled and no consideration will be delivered in exchange therefor. Each share of W.P. Stewart common stock owned by any direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of W.P. Stewart, AllianceBernstein or Merger Sub (other than shares held in trust accounts, managed accounts, mutual funds and the like, or otherwise held in a fiduciary or agency capacity, that are beneficially owned by third parties) immediately prior to the effective time will be converted into a number of shares of common stock of the surviving corporation so as to maintain relative ownership percentages.

        At the effective time of the merger, each share of common stock of Merger Sub issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will be converted into one newly issued, fully paid and nonassessable share of common stock of the surviving corporation.

        Under the terms of the merger agreement, as soon as reasonably practicable following the effective time of the merger, an exchange agent appointed by AllianceBernstein will mail to each record holder of W.P. Stewart common stock converted into the right to receive merger consideration a letter of transmittal and instructions for use in surrendering certificates or book-entry shares in exchange for the merger consideration. W.P. Stewart common stock certificates should not be surrendered for exchange by W.P. Stewart stockholders before the effective time of the merger.

        After the effective time of the merger, there will be no transfers on the stock transfer books of W.P. Stewart of any shares of common stock that were issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time other than to settle transfers of common stock that occurred prior to the effective time.


Equity Awards

        As of the effective time of the merger, each restricted share of W.P. Stewart common stock granted to any employee or director of W.P. Stewart or any of its subsidiaries (other than a portion of the restricted shares held by an executive officer of W.P. Stewart, which shall be forfeited) under a W.P. Stewart stock plan that is outstanding immediately prior to the effective time will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive the merger consideration, subject to such deduction and withholding as may be required under the Code and any applicable state or local tax law with respect to the lapsing of the restrictions on any such restricted shares.


Table of Contents


Representations and Warranties

        The merger agreement contains customary representations and warranties of W.P. Stewart, AllianceBernstein and Merger Sub relating to, among other things, certain aspects of the respective businesses and assets of the parties and other matters. The representations and warranties in the merger agreement do not survive the effective time of the merger.

        The merger agreement contains representations and warranties made by W.P. Stewart to AllianceBernstein, including relating to the following:


Table of Contents

The merger agreement contains representations and warranties made by AllianceBernstein and Merger Sub relating to a number of matters, including the following:

        Some of the representations and warranties in the merger agreement are qualified by materiality qualifications or a "material adverse effect" or a "Parent material adverse effect" clause.

        For purposes of the merger agreement, a "material adverse effect" means: any event, occurrence, fact, condition, change, development or effect that, individually or in the aggregate with all other effects, events, occurrences, developments, states of facts or changes, (i) is materially adverse to the business, results of operations or financial condition of W.P. Stewart and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (ii) prevents or materially impairs or delays the consummation by W.P. Stewart of the merger or the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement on a timely basis. However, the foregoing clause (i) will not include events, occurrences, facts, conditions, changes, developments or effects resulting from:


Table of Contents

provided that, with respect to the second, third and fourth bullet, such events, occurrences, facts, conditions, changes, developments or effects will be taken into account to the extent W.P. Stewart and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, are materially disproportionately affected thereby as compared with other equities-based investment management companies.

        For the purpose of the merger agreement, a "Parent material adverse effect" means any event that would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on the ability of AllianceBernstein or Merger Sub to fulfill its obligations under the merger agreement and consummate the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement in a timely manner.


Conduct of Business Pending the Merger

        The merger agreement provides that, during the period from the signing of the merger agreement to the effective time of the merger or earlier termination of the merger agreement, (a) except as set forth in the disclosure schedules delivered by W.P. Stewart in connection with the merger agreement, except to the extent expressly prohibited by the merger agreement, W.P. Stewart will, and will cause each of its subsidiaries to, use commercially reasonable efforts to (i) conduct its business in the regular and ordinary course of business consistent with past practice and (ii) maintain and preserve intact its business organization, its rights, authorizations, franchises and other authorizations issued by governmental entities, and advantageous business relationships, and retain the services of its key officers and key employees, and (b) except to the extent expressly permitted by the merger agreement, each of W.P. Stewart and AllianceBernstein will, and will cause each of its respective subsidiaries to, take no action that is intended to or would reasonably be expected to prevent, or materially delay or impede, the satisfaction of any of the conditions set forth in the merger agreement.


Table of Contents

        In addition, during the period from the signing of the merger agreement to the effective time of the merger or earlier termination of the merger agreement, except as required by applicable law or as expressly required by the merger agreement, neither W.P. Stewart nor any of its affiliates will, without the prior written consent of AllianceBernstein (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), subject, in some cases, to certain exceptions:


Table of Contents


Other Covenants

Regulatory Matters

        Under the terms of the merger agreement, W.P. Stewart and AllianceBernstein have agreed to cooperate with each other and use their respective reasonable best efforts to promptly prepare and file all necessary documentation, to effect all applications, notices, petitions and filings, to obtain as promptly as practicable all permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of all third parties and governmental entities that are necessary or advisable to consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement (including the merger), and to comply with the terms and conditions of all such permits, consents, approvals and authorizations of all such third parties or governmental entities.

Mutual Fund Approvals

        W.P. Stewart has agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with the mutual fund in obtaining approval of its board of trustees or directors of a new advisory contract with a subsidiary of W.P. Stewart (or AllianceBernstein or an appropriate affiliate) to be in effect as of, and subject to, the closing, with the same advisory fees as in effect as of the date of the merger agreement (giving effect to the fee caps applicable thereto) and otherwise on terms substantially similar to the terms of the existing advisory contract relating to the mutual fund. If the mutual fund board approval for a new advisory contract is obtained, W.P. Stewart will use its commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with the mutual fund obtaining in accordance with the Investment Company Act, as promptly as practicable following the date of such board approval, the due consideration and approval by the shareholders of the mutual fund of such new advisory contract.


Table of Contents

Other Client Consents

        If consent to the assignment or deemed assignment of an advisory contract of W.P. Stewart or its subsidiaries with a client (other than the mutual fund) in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement is required by applicable law or by such client's advisory contract, W.P. Stewart or the applicable subsidiary will send a notice complying with applicable law and the terms of such client's advisory contract in form and substance reasonably acceptable to AllianceBernstein informing such client of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and requesting written consent to the assignment of such advisory contract in connection with the merger.

        Under the merger agreement, consent to the assignment or deemed assignment of an advisory contract with a client of W.P. Stewart or its subsidiaries (other than the mutual fund) is deemed given (A) if written client consent is required under the applicable advisory contract or applicable law, upon receipt of the written client consent requested in the notice prior to the closing date or (B) to the extent permitted under applicable law and if no written consent is required under the applicable advisory contract, (x) upon receipt of a written consent requested in the notice prior to the closing date or (y) if no such written consent is received, if 60 days have passed since the sending of written notice to such client requesting consent to the assignment, and setting forth certain additional information set forth in the merger agreement.

        W.P. Stewart has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the consent to the assignment or deemed assignment of all of its and its subsidiaries' advisory contracts.

Access and Information

        Upon reasonable notice and subject to applicable law, W.P. Stewart and its subsidiaries must afford to AllianceBernstein and to its representatives reasonable access during normal business hours and without undue disruption of normal business activity, during the period prior to the effective time of the merger, to its books, records, properties, and other information concerning its business, properties and personnel. AllianceBernstein has also agreed, upon reasonable request, to furnish information about it and its business as is relevant to W.P. Stewart and its stockholders in connection with the merger.

SEC Filings and Stockholder Approval

        AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart have agreed to promptly prepare and file with the SEC the Form S-4, of which this proxy statement/prospectus is a part, and to use their reasonable best efforts to have the Form S-4 declared effective as promptly as practicable, after which time W.P. Stewart will mail or deliver the proxy statement to its stockholders. W.P. Stewart will promptly and duly call and give notice as promptly as reasonably practicable following the date upon which the Form S-4 is cleared by the SEC, and will convene and hold as promptly as reasonably practicable thereafter, a meeting of the stockholders of W.P. Stewart for the sole purpose of adopting the merger agreement.

Limitation on W.P. Stewart's Ability to Consider Other Acquisition Proposals

        Until the effective time of the merger or, if earlier, the termination of the merger agreement, W.P. Stewart has agreed that it will not, and will not authorize or knowingly permit any of its subsidiaries or any of its or their representatives to, directly or indirectly:


Table of Contents

        Notwithstanding the foregoing, if prior to obtaining the required vote of W.P. Stewart's stockholders to adopt the merger agreement, W.P. Stewart or any of its subsidiaries receives a bona fide, written acquisition proposal (other than as a result of taking the prohibited actions described above) and the board of directors of W.P. Stewart determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and financial advisors, that such acquisition proposal is, or is reasonably likely to lead to, a superior proposal (as defined below) and such acquisition proposal has not been withdrawn and the board of directors of W.P. Stewart determines, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties to W.P. Stewart's stockholders under applicable law, then W.P. Stewart may take the following actions:

        In this case, W.P. Stewart must, among other things, provide AllianceBernstein orally and in writing as promptly as reasonably practicable (and in any event within 24 hours after receipt and at least 24 hours prior to furnishing information) the material terms and conditions of any such acquisition proposal or acquisition inquiry and the identity of the person making such acquisition proposal or acquisition inquiry and, if in writing, must provide AllianceBernstein with a copy of such acquisition proposal or acquisition inquiry. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if W.P. Stewart is not permitted to provide such acquisition proposal or acquisition inquiry to AllianceBernstein pursuant to the terms of a confidentiality agreement in effect prior to the date of the merger agreement, then it will have no obligation to provide such acquisition proposal or acquisition inquiry to AllianceBernstein but such acquisition proposal or acquisition inquiry will not constitute a superior proposal for purposes of the merger agreement unless and until the person making such acquisition proposal or acquisition inquiry has waived the provisions of such confidentiality agreement that prevent the disclosure of such acquisition proposal or acquisition enquiry and W.P. Stewart has complied with the notice requirements described above. W.P. Stewart must also keep AllianceBernstein reasonably informed of the status of any such acquisition proposal or acquisition inquiry.

        In addition, the board of directors of W.P. Stewart may not, directly or indirectly, (i) withdraw or qualify (or amend or modify in a manner adverse to AllianceBernstein) or publicly propose to withdraw or qualify (or amend or modify in a manner adverse to AllianceBernstein), the approval, adoption, recommendation or declaration of advisability of the merger agreement or the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or recommend, adopt or approve, or propose publicly to recommend, adopt or approve, any acquisition proposal, or make any public statement (other than a "stop, look and listen" communication or similar communication of the type contemplated by Rule 14d-9(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) inconsistent with the board's recommendation that the stockholders of W.P. Stewart adopt the merger agreement (which we refer to as a "change in the company recommendation"), or (ii) approve, adopt or recommend, or publicly propose to approve, adopt or recommend, or allow W.P. Stewart or any of its subsidiaries to execute or


Table of Contents

enter into, any letter of intent, memorandum of understanding, agreement in principle, merger agreement, acquisition agreement, option agreement, joint venture agreement, partnership agreement or other similar contract (other than a confidentiality agreement referred to above) (A) constituting or that could reasonably be expected to lead to any acquisition proposal or (B) requiring it to abandon, terminate or fail to consummate the merger or any other transaction contemplated by the merger agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, prior to obtaining the required vote of W.P. Stewart's stockholders to adopt the merger agreement, the W.P. Stewart board of directors may make a change in the company recommendation related to an acquisition proposal or take an action described in clause (ii) above if:

        Under the merger agreement, a "change in control transaction" means (i) any merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination, reorganization, recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or other similar transaction involving W.P. Stewart or any of its subsidiaries that would constitute a "significant subsidiary" (as defined in Rule 1-02 of Regulation S-X promulgated under the Exchange Act, but substituting "20 percent" for reference to "10 percent" therein) (unless W.P. Stewart stockholders immediately prior thereto would own eighty percent (80%) or more of the surviving or resulting company or its ultimate parent immediately thereafter in substantially the same proportion, relative to one another, as they owned immediately prior thereto), (ii) any direct or indirect acquisition or purchase, in a single transaction or a series of related transactions, including by means of the acquisition of capital stock of any of W.P. Stewart's subsidiaries, of assets or properties that constitute twenty percent (20%) or more of the assets of W.P. Stewart and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or twenty percent (20%) or more of any class of equity securities of W.P. Stewart, (iii) any tender offer or exchange offer in which any person or "group" (as such term is defined under the Exchange Act) offers to acquire beneficial ownership (as such term is used in Regulation 13D under the Exchange Act), or the right to acquire beneficial ownership, of twenty percent (20%) or more of the outstanding shares of W.P. Stewart common stock, in each case, other than the merger or (iv) any transaction involving a


Table of Contents

merger of the mutual fund with or into another person or any other similar extraordinary transaction involving the mutual fund.

        Under the merger agreement, a "superior proposal" means an unsolicited bona fide written acquisition proposal made after the date of the merger agreement and not resulting from a breach of the restrictions described in this subsection which the board of directors of W.P. Stewart determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors), taking into account all legal, financial, regulatory, expected time to close, and other aspects of the acquisition proposal (including, but not limited to, any break-up fees, expense reimbursement provisions and the conditions for completion of such acquisition proposal) and the identity of the person making the acquisition proposal, (i) has terms that, if the acquisition proposal is consummated, are more favorable from a financial point of view to holders of W.P. Stewart common stock than the merger (taking into account any changes to the terms of the merger agreement proposed by AllianceBernstein as described above) and (ii) is reasonably likely to be consummated on the terms proposed, taking into account all legal, financial, regulatory, expected time to close and other aspects of the acquisition proposal, including a conclusion that its financing, to the extent required, is then fully committed; except that, for purposes of the definition of "superior proposal," the term "change in control transaction" has the meaning assigned to such term in the merger agreement, except that the references to "twenty percent (20%)" in such definition are deemed to be references to "eighty percent (80%)" and clause (iv) of such definition is disregarded.

        The merger agreement also provides that W.P. Stewart will not release a person from, or amend or waive any provision of any confidentiality, standstill or similar contract to which W.P. Stewart is or becomes a party in connection with an acquisition proposal or acquisition inquiry, unless the board determines in good faith after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, that the offer or proposal to which such contract relates is, or is reasonably likely to lead to, a superior proposal, and, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties to W.P. Stewart's stockholders under applicable law.

Employee Matters

        For at least one year immediately following the effective time, employees of W.P. Stewart who continue to be employed by AllianceBernstein or its subsidiaries following the effective time will be provided with compensation and benefits that, in the aggregate, are substantially comparable to the compensation and benefits that are generally made available to similarly situated active employees of AllianceBernstein or its subsidiaries. For the avoidance of doubt, the continued participation following the effective time of such employees in benefit plans of W.P. Stewart will satisfy the forgoing provisions. In addition, AllianceBernstein will use commercially reasonable efforts to treat the service of employees of W.P. Stewart prior to the closing as service with AllianceBernstein for the purposes of eligibility, vesting and benefit accrual rates and contribution rate under AllianceBernstein's benefit plans following the closing date.

Indemnification; Directors' and Officers' Insurance

        AllianceBernstein and the surviving corporation will jointly and severally indemnify and hold harmless each present and former director and officer of W.P. Stewart to the same extent such persons are indemnified by W.P. Stewart or held harmless as of the date of the merger agreement pursuant to the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of W.P. Stewart and to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law for acts or omissions which occurred at or prior to the effective time of the merger, including with respect to any matter relating to or arising out of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.


Table of Contents

        For a period of six years from the effective time of the merger, the surviving corporation will cause to be maintained in effect the current policies of directors' and officers' liability insurance and fiduciary liability coverage maintained by W.P. Stewart; provided that the surviving corporation may substitute therefor replacement policies (or prior to the closing of the merger, AllianceBernstein may purchase a run-off or tail insurance policy) with at least the same coverage and amounts containing terms and conditions that are substantially the same as, or more favorable than, those of W.P. Stewart's policies as of the date of the merger agreement, including deductibles and caps that are no less favorable to the directors and officers than those in effect as of the date of the merger agreement, covering acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the effective time of the merger, including with respect to any matter relating to or arising out of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, with respect to officers and directors who are covered by W.P. Stewart's directors' and officers' liability insurance policy as of the date of the merger agreement; provided, further, that if the annual premiums for such insurance for any single year in such six-year period exceed 250% of the per annum rate of premium paid by W.P. Stewart and its subsidiaries as of the date of the merger agreement, then AllianceBernstein will, or will cause its subsidiaries to, provide only such coverage as is then available at an annual premium equal to 250% of such rate.

Additional Covenants

        The merger agreement contains additional agreements between W.P. Stewart, AllianceBernstein and Merger Sub relating to, among other matters:


Conditions to the Merger

        The obligations of the parties to effect the merger are subject to the fulfillment at or prior to the effective time of the merger of the following mutual conditions:


Table of Contents

        The obligation of AllianceBernstein and Merger Sub to effect the merger is also subject to the fulfillment or waiver by AllianceBernstein, at or prior to the effective time of the merger, of the following additional conditions:

        As used in the merger agreement, "closing revenue run-rate" means the aggregate annualized investment advisory, investment management and subadvisory fees for all clients for whom W.P. Stewart or one of its subsidiaries provides investment advisory services pursuant to an investment advisory contract (other than the mutual fund) payable to W.P. Stewart or its subsidiaries, determined by multiplying the adjusted AUM for each such account as of the fifth (5th) business day prior to the closing date by the applicable fee rate (net of any fee waivers, subadvisory fees payable by W.P. Stewart, referral or servicing fees, and other similar fee reductions) for such account at such date (generally excluding any performance-based fees).

        As used in the merger agreement, "adjusted AUM" means, with respect to a client (other than the mutual fund), as of a particular date, the dollar amount of assets under management by W.P. Stewart and its subsidiaries for such client, without duplication and excluding, with respect to the calculation of the closing revenue run-rate, any portion thereof attributable to a client that has not given or been deemed to have given (or withdrawn) its consent to the assignment or deemed assignment of its advisory contract, as of June 30, 2013 (or, in the case of a client who became such following June 30, 2013 (which we refer to as a "new client"), such later date as such new client first became a client), as adjusted to reflect net asset flows (i.e., additions to and withdrawals from assets under management by W.P. Stewart and its subsidiaries for such client and reinvestments of dividends and interest therein) following June 30, 2013 (or, in the case of a new client, such later date as such new client first became a client) through and including the applicable testing date.


Table of Contents

        The obligation of W.P. Stewart to effect the merger is also subject to the fulfillment or waiver by W.P. Stewart, at or prior to the effective time of the merger, of the following additional conditions:


Termination of the Merger Agreement

        The merger agreement may be terminated and the merger may be abandoned (before or after the obtaining of the W.P. Stewart stockholder approval) by mutual written consent of AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart. In addition, the merger agreement may be terminated in the following circumstances:


Table of Contents

        If the merger agreement is terminated, then it will be of no further effect; provided however that certain designated provisions of the merger agreement will survive the termination, including those relating to payment of a termination fee and deal expenses and the confidential treatment of information, and no party to the merger agreement will be relieved of liability or damages arising out of its knowing, willful or intentional breach of any provision of the merger agreement.


Termination Fee

        W.P. Stewart will pay to AllianceBernstein a termination fee of $3,200,000 (which we refer to as the "termination fee") and an amount equal to all documented out-of-pocket expenses of AllianceBernstein, not to exceed $800,000, incurred in connection with its due diligence of W.P. Stewart,


Table of Contents

the negotiation of the merger agreement and actions taken after the date of the merger agreement in contemplation of closing, in the event that:


Amendment

        The merger agreement may be amended by the parties thereto at any time before the effective time of the merger provided that after the adoption of the merger agreement by W.P. Stewart's


Table of Contents

stockholders, there may not be, without further approval of such stockholders, any amendment of the merger agreement that requires further approval under applicable law.


Employment Agreements

        Mark Phelps and James Tierney, current executive officers of W.P. Stewart, each entered into an employment agreement in connection with the execution of the merger agreement.

        The employment agreements with Mr. Phelps and Mr. Tierney are substantially the same, with certain variances due to Mr. Phelps being primarily located in London, England. The employment agreements provide for an annual base salary (£250,000 for Mr. Phelps and $375,000 for Mr. Tierney), minimum total cash compensation for 2014 of $700,000 (including any payments in 2014 from W.P. Stewart), participation in AllianceBernstein's year-end incentive compensation award program, and a one-time special award of restricted units representing assignments of beneficial ownership of limited partnership interests in AllianceBernstein Holding L.P., or Holding Units, with a value equal to $4,000,000 (determined in accordance with the process set forth in the employment agreement), which vest subject to continued employment through the fifth anniversary. In the event of a termination of employment by AllianceBernstein without Cause (as defined in the employment agreement) prior to the vesting date of the units, the terminated executive would be entitled to a lump sum severance payment equal to the grant date value of the Holding Units and, subject to the execution and non revocation of a release, continued base salary for 26 weeks following termination of the executive's employment (in addition to any applicable notice requirements for Mr. Phelps). Mr. Tierney's employment agreement also provides terms for the 2014 and 2015 bonus pools for W.P. Stewart's investment team. The employment agreement provides for a minimum total compensation pool of $8 million for W.P. Stewart's investment team in 2014 and a minimum total compensation pool of $7 million and a maximum total compensation pool of $11 million in 2015 (with the actual total compensation pool to be calculated based on a formula set by AllianceBernstein). The employment agreements also provide that each executive is subject to a covenant not to solicit employees or clients while they are employed and until (i) if the executive voluntarily terminates employment, the five year anniversary of the date the units are granted or (ii) if AllianceBernstein terminates the executive, for twelve months following the termination of employment. Each of Mr. Phelps and Mr. Tierney is currently expected to continue in his current role with W.P. Stewart as a portfolio manager following the merger.

        In addition, in connection with the execution of the merger agreement, W.P. Stewart entered into a letter agreement with William P. Stewart which provides for his separation from W.P. Stewart on the earlier of the closing of the merger and the end of the term of his existing employment agreement with W.P. Stewart on December 31, 2013. The separation agreement does not provide for any additional compensation to be paid to Mr. Stewart in connection with his separation from W.P. Stewart.


Voting Agreements

        In connection with their execution of the merger agreement, AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart entered into voting and support agreements and irrevocable proxies with certain stockholders of W.P. Stewart who are also themselves directors or affiliated with directors of W.P. Stewart (which we refer to collectively as the "voting agreements"). The following summary of the voting agreements is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the form of voting agreement included in this proxy statement as Annex E, which is incorporated herein by reference.

        Pursuant to the voting agreements, as long as the merger remains in effect, each stockholder party to a voting agreement agreed to vote his/her shares of W.P. Stewart common stock:


Table of Contents

        Each stockholder also agreed to grant AllianceBernstein and any designee of AllianceBernstein an irrevocable proxy, which would automatically terminate upon the termination of the voting agreement. In addition, pursuant to the voting agreements, each stockholder party to a voting agreement agreed to waive appraisal rights.

        The voting agreements provide that each stockholder party to a voting agreement will not, other than pursuant to the merger, directly or indirectly:

        The voting agreements will terminate upon the earlier of the effective time of the merger and the termination of the merger agreement in accordance with its terms.

        As of the record date, approximately [            ] shares are subject to the voting agreements, representing in the aggregate approximately [            ]% of the voting power of the shares of W.P. Stewart common stock outstanding on that date.


William P. Stewart Voting Agreement

        In connection with their execution of the merger agreement, AllianceBernstein and W.P. Stewart also entered into a voting agreement with William P. Stewart (which we refer to as the "William P. Stewart voting agreement"). The following summary of the William P. Stewart voting agreement is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the William P. Stewart voting agreement which is included in this proxy statement as Annex F, which is incorporated herein by reference.

        Pursuant to the William P. Stewart voting agreement, William P. Stewart has agreed to vote all shares of W.P. Stewart common stock of which he is the beneficial owner and has sole authority to vote in favor of the approval of the merger agreement and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

        The W.P. Stewart voting agreement will terminate upon the earlier of the effective time of the merger and the termination of the merger agreement in accordance with its terms.

        As of the record date, approximately [            ] shares are subject to the William P. Stewart voting agreement, representing approximately [            ]% of the voting power of the shares of W.P. Stewart common stock outstanding on that date. Together with the voting agreements, as of the record date approximately [            ] shares of W.P. Stewart common stock have agreed to vote to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger, representing in the aggregate approximately [            ]% of the voting power of the shares of W.P. Stewart common stock outstanding on the record date.


Table of Contents


DESCRIPTION OF THE CVRS

CVR Agreement

        In connection with the closing of the merger, AllianceBernstein and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, as trustee, will enter into a contingent value rights agreement substantially in the form of the contingent value rights agreement included in this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex B (which we refer to as the "CVR agreement"), which is incorporated herein by reference. The following summary describes the material provisions of the contingent value rights agreement. This summary may not contain all of the information about the contingent value rights agreement that is important to you. You are encouraged to read the form of contingent value rights agreement carefully in its entirety because when entered into by and between AllianceBernstein and the trustee, it will be the legal document governing the contingent value rights to be issued to former W.P. Stewart stockholders in connection with the merger.


Trust Indenture Act

        If any provision of the CVR agreement conflicts with any provision required to be included in the CVR agreement by any provision of the Trust Indenture Act, such required provision shall control. The terms of the CVRs include those that will be stated in the CVR agreement and those that will be made part of the CVR agreement by reference to the applicable provisions of the Trust Indenture Act.


Characteristics of the CVRs

        The CVRs are not equity or voting securities of AllianceBernstein, do not represent ownership interests in AllianceBernstein and holders of the CVRs are not entitled to any rights of a unitholder or other equity or voting security of AllianceBernstein, either at law or in equity. The rights of the CVR holders will be limited to those expressly provided for in the CVR agreement.


AUM Milestone

        A holder of a CVR is entitled to a cash payment in an amount equal to $4.00 per CVR, less any applicable withholding taxes and without interest (which we refer to as the "AUM milestone payment") upon the achievement of the AUM milestone (as defined below). No payments will be made under the CVR Agreement if the AUM milestone is achieved after the third anniversary of the effective time of the merger, and, subject to certain limited exceptions, the CVR agreement will terminate on the earlier of the third anniversary of the effective time of the merger and ten (10) days after the date on which the CVR holders are paid the AUM milestone payment by the trustee or paying agent.

        As used in the CVR agreement, the "AUM milestone" means the first date, on or prior to the third anniversary of the date on which the effective time of the merger occurs, on which any one or more of the following occurs: (i) assets under management (as defined below) exceeds $5,000,000,000, (provided, that such date must be either (x) the last day of a calendar month or (y) a mid-month measuring date, as defined below), (ii) any merger or consolidation of W.P. Stewart with or into any person or any sale or disposition to any person or persons of all or substantially all of the common stock or assets of W.P. Stewart in any transaction or series of transactions, unless in each case AllianceBernstein or one or more of its affiliates (or their ultimate parent company) would wholly own (other than any employee equity interests) the surviving or resulting company or substantially all of the assets used in the investment advisory business of W.P. Stewart immediately thereafter (not including any consolidation or merger, share exchange, reorganization, tender or exchange offer or any other business combination transaction involving AllianceBernstein or any parent company), (iii) the discontinuation or cessation of all or substantially all of the business of WPS group (as defined below), (iv) any willful and material breach of the specified conduct (as defined below) obligations of


Table of Contents

AllianceBernstein, or (v) the occurrence of any breach that materially and adversely impacts the ability to achieve the AUM milestone.

        If, at the end of any calendar month before the third anniversary of the date on which the effective time of the merger occurs, assets under management (as defined below) exceeds $4,500,000,000 (such date is referred to as a "month-end triggering date"). AllianceBernstein must, within five business days, indicate such fact in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC. Upon the occurrence of any month-end triggering date, holders of the CVRs have the right, upon the written demand of not less than 25% of the outstanding CVRs, and upon 15 days' notice to AllianceBernstein, to require AllianceBernstein to determine the amount of assets under management as of the close of business on the 15th day of any calendar month after the month-end triggering date (any such day is referred to as a "mid-month measuring date"); provided, however, that the holders of the CVRs may only exercise such right up to six times in any calendar year. As used in the CVR agreement, "assets under management" means, without duplication, the assets under management:

        Except as provided in each of (i) – (iii) above, any assets under management resulting from the investment of funds managed by AllianceBernstein or any of its affiliates other than WPS group are excluded from assets under management.

        As used in the CVR agreement, "WPS group" means, without duplication:


Table of Contents


AUM Milestone Payment Date

        The AUM milestone payment will be made twenty (20) business days following the achievement of the AUM milestone. On the AUM milestone payment date AllianceBernstein will pay to the trustee by wire transfer an amount equal to the product of (i) the AUM milestone payment due on that date multiplied by (ii) the number of outstanding CVRs. The trustee will promptly (but in any event within two (2) business days) make the AUM milestone payment to holders of record of the CVRs as of the close of business in New York City, three business days prior to the AUM milestone payment date. The payment will be an amount equal to the product of (i) such AUM milestone payment multiplied by (ii) the number of CVRs held by such holder.

        Amounts payable by AllianceBernstein in respect of the CVRs will be considered paid on the AUM milestone payment date if on such date the trustee or paying agent (if a non-affiliate of AllianceBernstein) holds money sufficient to pay all such amounts then due in accordance with the CVR agreement. AllianceBernstein, its affiliates, the trustee and the paying agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold any amounts required to be deducted and withheld under any tax law. The consent of the CVR holder is not required for any such withholding.


Issuance of CVRs

        The CVRs will be issued following the effective time of the merger to holders of W.P. Stewart common stock immediately prior to the merger whose shares have been converted into the right to receive the merger consideration. The CVR agreement provides for authentication of the CVRs by the trustee upon execution and delivery of such CVRs pursuant to the CVR agreement. The CVRs may be issued in book-entry form.


Transferability of CVRs

        The CVRs are freely transferable and any interest therein may be sold, assigned, pledged, encumbered or in any manner transferred or disposed of, in whole or in part, as long as the transfer or other disposition is made in accordance with the applicable provisions of the CVR agreement and in compliance with applicable United States federal and state securities laws and any other applicable laws.


Registration and Transfers

        AllianceBernstein will cause to be kept at the office of the trustee a register in which, subject to such reasonable regulations as it may prescribe, AllianceBernstein will provide for the registration and transfer of the CVRs.

        Upon surrender for registration of transfer of any CVR at the office or agency of AllianceBernstein designated by AllianceBernstein, AllianceBernstein will execute, and the trustee will authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new CVR certificates or evidence of book-entry CVRs, representing the same aggregate number of CVRs represented by the CVR certificate (or book-entry CVRs) so surrendered that are to be transferred


Table of Contents

and AllianceBernstein will execute and the trustee will authenticate and deliver, as applicable, in the name of the transferor, one or more new CVR certificates (or evidence of book-entry CVRs) representing the aggregate number of CVRs represented by such CVR certificate (or book-entry CVRs), if any, that are not to be transferred.

        All CVRs presented or surrendered for registration of transfer or for exchange shall (if so required by AllianceBernstein or the trustee, acting as the CVR registrar) be accompanied by a written statement of transfer in form reasonably satisfactory to AllianceBernstein or the trustee, acting as the CVR registrar, duly executed by the holder thereof or his attorney duly authorized in writing.

        No service charge will be made for any registration of transfer or exchange of CVRs, but AllianceBernstein may require payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other governmental charge that may be imposed in connection with any registration of transfer or exchange of CVRs.


Ranking

        The CVRs will rank equal in right of payment to all existing and future unsecured unsubordinated indebtedness of AllianceBernstein, and senior in right of payment to all subordinated indebtedness of AllianceBernstein. The CVRs, however, will be effectively subordinated in right of payment to all of AllianceBernstein's secured obligations to the extent of the collateral securing such obligations and to any senior obligations of AllianceBernstein.


Reporting Obligations

        The CVR agreement provides that AllianceBernstein will file with the trustee, and make available on its website, the following:

        The CVR Agreement also provides that AllianceBernstein will file with the trustee, include in a current report on Form 8-K and make available on its website the following:

        AllianceBernstein will also file with the trustee such additional information, documents and reports with respect to compliance by AllianceBernstein with the conditions and covenants of the CVR agreement as may be required from time to time by the rules and regulations of the SEC.


Table of Contents


AUM Milestone Review Procedures

        Until the AUM milestone payment has been paid, prior to February 9 of each year during the term of the CVR agreement, AllianceBernstein will provide an independent certified public accounting firm of nationally recognized standing selected by its board of directors with access during normal business hours to such of the records of AllianceBernstein as may be reasonably necessary to verify (i) the accuracy of the statements set forth in the AUM statements for the immediately preceding calendar year and the figures underlying the calculations set forth therein and (ii) the accuracy of AllianceBernstein management's assertion as to whether the AUM milestone had been achieved at any time during the immediately preceding calendar year. The fees charged by such accounting firm shall be paid by AllianceBernstein. AllianceBernstein will cause the accountant to disclose in writing to the trustee within ninety (90) days after the applicable calendar year end that it has verified the accuracy of management's assertion as to whether the AUM milestone has been achieved at any time during the preceding calendar year or concluded that such assertion is incorrect (such disclosure is referred to as the "annual AUM report"). If the AUM milestone payment has not been paid prior to the three year anniversary of the effective time of the merger, then no later than ten (10) business days after such three year anniversary, AllianceBernstein will provide the accountant with access during normal business hours to such of the records of AllianceBernstein as may be reasonably necessary to verify (i) the accuracy of the statements set forth in the AUM statements and the figures underlying the calculations set forth in the AUM statements and (ii) the accuracy of AllianceBernstein management's assertion as to whether the AUM milestone had been achieved at any time during the period following the year with respect to the most recently delivered annual AUM report until and including the three year anniversary of the effective time of the merger. AllianceBernstein will cause the accountant to disclose in writing to the trustee no later than ninety (90) days after the three year anniversary of the effective time whether AllianceBernstein management has determined that the AUM milestone had been achieved at any time during the period covered by such report and that it has verified the accuracy of AllianceBernstein management's assertion as to whether the AUM milestone has been achieved at any time during the applicable period or concluded that such assertion is incorrect (such disclosure is referred to as the "final AUM report"). The accountant will provide AllianceBernstein with a copy of all disclosures made to the trustee. Following receipt of any such disclosures, AllianceBernstein will file such disclosures with the trustee, and will promptly mail a copy of any such annual AUM report or final AUM report, as applicable, to all CVR holders.

        If the AUM milestone payment should have been paid but was not paid when due, AllianceBernstein will pay each CVR holder the AUM milestone payment plus interest as set forth in the CVR agreement from the date the AUM milestone payment date should have occurred to the date of actual payment. AllianceBernstein will pay this amount to the CVR holders of record as of a date that is three (3) business days prior to the AUM milestone payment date selected by AllianceBernstein, which date must be within twenty (20) business days after the date that the annual AUM report or final AUM report, as applicable, showing that the AUM milestone had been achieved at any time during the period covered thereby was delivered to the CVR holders.


Efforts

        The CVR agreement provides that AllianceBernstein will, and will cause its subsidiaries (including WPS group) to, use diligent efforts (as defined below) to achieve the AUM milestone. In addition, AllianceBernstein will, and will cause its subsidiaries to, cause WPS group to be operated as a distinct investment team and use commercially reasonable efforts to operate in compliance with law in all material respects. AllianceBernstein will use diligent efforts to maintain a running calculation of assets under management.


Table of Contents

        In furtherance of these requirements, AllianceBernstein has agreed to operate the business of W.P. Stewart following the merger in accordance with the following additional requirements, which are referred to as the "specified conduct":

        As used in the CVR agreement, "diligent efforts" means the efforts that a person operating a business similar to the business of such person would use in the reasonable exercise of discretion and good faith, as judged by the standards of the applicable business community, taking into consideration such person's own interests and financial and operating limitations; provided, however, that such efforts do not require such person to incur a financial detriment in excess of what is, or spend in excess of what is, reasonable in relation to the benefit to be obtained by such person from the transaction to which such efforts relate. Under the CVR agreement, the performance by AllianceBernstein of the specified conduct (defined immediately above) creates a presumption that AllianceBernstein has used diligent efforts to achieve the AUM milestone.


Breach

        Each one of the following events, if it occurs and is continuing, is a breach of the CVR agreement:


Table of Contents

        The foregoing provisions, however, are subject to the condition that if, at any time after the trustee has brought suit based on a breach, and before any judgment or decree for the payment of the moneys due has been obtained or entered, AllianceBernstein pays or deposits with the trustee a sum sufficient to pay all amounts which have become due and payable (with interest) and such amount as is sufficient to cover reasonable compensation to the trustee, its external agents and counsel, and all other reasonable expenses of the trustee, and if any and all breaches under the CVR agreement have been cured, waived or otherwise remedied, then the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding CVRs may waive all breaches with respect to the CVRs, but no such waiver or rescission and annulment shall extend to or shall affect any subsequent breach or shall impair any right consequent thereof.

        Except where authorization and/or appearance of each of the CVR holders is required by applicable law, if a breach described above occurs and is continuing, then either the trustee by notice in writing to AllianceBernstein, or the trustee upon the written request of the holders of a majority of the CVRs by notice in writing to AllianceBernstein and the trustee, shall bring suit to protect the rights of the CVR holders, including to obtain payment for any amounts then due and payable, which amounts shall bear interest at prime rate plus 3% from the date such amounts were due and payable until payment is made to the trustee.

        Furthermore, in case a breach described above has occurred, has not been waived and is continuing, the trustee may in its discretion, and upon the act of the CVR holders of not less than 25% of the outstanding CVRs and together with an offer to the trustee of reasonable indemnity against the costs, expenses and liabilities to be incurred therein or thereby shall, proceed to protect and enforce the rights vested in it by the CVR agreement by such appropriate judicial proceedings as the trustee shall deem most effectual to protect and enforce any of such rights (unless authorization and/or appearance of each of the CVR holders is required by applicable law).


Amendment of CVR Agreement Without Consent of CVR Holders

        Without the consent of the CVR holders, AllianceBernstein and the trustee may amend the CVR agreement or the CVRs for the following purposes:


Table of Contents

        The trustee shall notify the CVR holders of any such amendment.


Amendment of CVR Agreement with Consent of CVR Holders

        With the consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding CVRs, AllianceBernstein and the trustee may make other amendments to the CVR agreement or the CVRs, except that no amendment may, without the consent of the holder of each outstanding CVR affected thereby:


Purchases of CVRs by AllianceBernstein

        AllianceBernstein is permitted to acquire any of the CVRs, whether in open market transactions, private transactions, or otherwise.


Limitation on Suits by Holders

        Subject to the rights described in "—AUM Milestone Review Procedures" above, and the rights of the holders of CVRs described in "—Unconditional Right of Holders to Institute Certain Suits" below, no holder of CVRs shall have any right under the CVR agreement to institute an action or proceeding with respect to the CVR agreement, or for the appointment of a trustee, receiver, liquidator, custodian or other similar official, unless: (i) the holder previously gave the trustee written notice of breach; (ii) holders of 25% of the outstanding CVRs have made a request in writing to the trustee to institute such action as trustee; and (iii) the holder has offered the trustee a reasonable indemnity against the costs, expenses and liabilities it may incur in such action or proceeding, and the trustee for fifteen (15) days after receiving the notice and request has not instituted any action or proceeding and no direction inconsistent with the written request was given to the trustee.


Unconditional Right of Holders to Institute Certain Suits

        Notwithstanding any other provision in the CVR agreement or the CVR, the right of holders of CVRs to receive payment of the amounts payable in respect of the CVRs on or after their respective


Table of Contents

due dates, or to institute suit for the enforcement of any such payment on or after such respective dates, may not be impaired or affected without the consent of the holder.


Control by Holders; Removal of Trustee

        Generally, holders of at least a majority of the outstanding CVRs have the right to direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding for any remedy available to the trustee, or exercising any power granted to the trustee by the CVR agreement.

        If the trustee or AllianceBernstein determines that the trustee has a conflicting interest within the meaning of the Trust Indenture Act, and the trustee fails to comply with its obligations to eliminate the conflicting interest or resign, after written request to that effect by AllianceBernstein or any holder of CVRs, then any holder of CVRs who has been a bona fide holder for at least six months may on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, petition any court of competent jurisdiction for the removal of the trustee and the appointment of a successor trustee.


Table of Contents


W.P. STEWART MARKET PRICE, DIVIDEND AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

        W.P. Stewart's common stock is traded in the over the counter market under the symbol "WPSL". The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low bid quotation information per share of W.P. Stewart common stock, as reported by Bloomberg. These market quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

 
 High Low 

Fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

       

First quarter

 $8.25 $5.01 

Second quarter

 $7.40 $6.20 

Third quarter

 $12.30 $6.25 

Fourth quarter (through [            ])

 $[      ] $[      ] 

Fiscal year ended December 31, 2012

       

First quarter

 $6.80 $5.10 

Second quarter

 $6.25 $3.50 

Third quarter

 $5.10 $3.45 

Fourth quarter

 $6.00 $3.00 

Fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

       

First quarter

 $8.74 $6.00 

Second quarter

 $8.00 $5.10 

Third quarter

 $7.50 $2.00 

Fourth quarter

 $7.00 $3.00 

        As of [                  ], 2013, there were [                  ] holders of record of W.P. Stewart common stock.


Dividend Policy

        W.P. Stewart did not declare any cash dividends in the two years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 or the first two fiscal quarters of 2013 and does not intend to declare any dividends in the near future. W.P. Stewart's present policy is to retain earnings and preserve cash for future growth and development of our business.


Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

 
 Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 Number of securities
remaining available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities reflected
in column (a))
 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

  0  0  0 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

  0  0  80,000(1)
        

Total:

  0  0  80,000(1)
        

(1)
Represents restricted stock issuable upon attainment of performance incentives under Mr. Maquet's employment agreement. In addition, pursuant to the employment agreements of W.P. Stewart's investment team members, incentive bonuses may be payable in W.P. Stewart common stock, depending on whether certain performance goals are met and/or the amount of the bonus.

Table of Contents


EXPERTS

        The consolidated financial statements of AllianceBernstein L.P. as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 included in this proxy statement/prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.


LEGAL MATTERS

        The validity of the CVRs offered hereby will be passed upon for AllianceBernstein by Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (New York, New York).


WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

        AllianceBernstein files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information that AllianceBernstein files at the SEC's public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. You may also obtain copies of this information by mail from the Public Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates, or from commercial document retrieval services. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy and information statements and other information that issuers, including AllianceBernstein, file electronically with the SEC. These electronic SEC filings are available to the public at the SEC's Internet site, www.sec.gov. You can also review AllianceBernstein's SEC filings on its web site at http://www.alliancebernstein.com. Information included on AllianceBernstein's web site is not a part of this proxy statement/prospectus.

        AllianceBernstein has filed a registration statement on Form S-4 to register with the SEC the offering and sale of the CVRs to W.P. Stewart stockholders in the merger. This proxy statement/prospectus is a part of that registration statement and constitutes the prospectus of AllianceBernstein in addition to being a proxy statement for W.P. Stewart. This proxy statement/prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement because certain parts of the registration statement are omitted as provided by the rules and regulations of the SEC. You may inspect and copy the registration statement at the SEC's reference room or web addresses listed above.

        Except where the context otherwise indicates, AllianceBernstein has supplied all information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus relating to AllianceBernstein and Merger Sub, and W.P. Stewart has supplied all information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus relating to W.P. Stewart.

        You should rely only on the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus to vote your shares at the special meeting of W.P. Stewart stockholders. Neither AllianceBernstein nor W.P. Stewart has authorized anyone to provide you with information that differs from that contained in this proxy statement/prospectus. This proxy statement/prospectus is dated [                  ], 2013. You should not assume that the information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of any date other than that date, and neither the mailing of this proxy statement/prospectus to stockholders nor the issuance of CVRs in the merger shall create any implication to the contrary.

        This proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to purchase, the securities offered by this proxy statement/prospectus, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction to or from any person to whom or from whom it is unlawful to make such offer, solicitation of an offer or proxy solicitation in such jurisdiction.


Table of Contents


INDEX TO ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 Page

Audited consolidated financial statements

  

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 F-2

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2012 and 2011

 F-3

Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

 F-4

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

 F-5

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

 F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010

 F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 F-8

Unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements

  

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012

 F-61

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012 and the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)

 F-62

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012 and the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)

 F-63

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012

 F-64

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements JuneSeptember 30, 2013 (unaudited)

 F-65

Table of Contents


FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the General Partner and Unitholders of
AllianceBernstein L.P.:

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of AllianceBernstein L.P. and its subsidiaries ("AllianceBernstein") as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in partners' capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of AllianceBernstein's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AllianceBernstein at December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

  
New York, New York
February 12, 2013
  

Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

 
 December 31. 
 
 2012 2011 
 
 (in thousands, except unit
amounts)

 

ASSETS

       

Cash and cash equivalents

 $627,182 $638,681 

Cash and securities segregated, at fair value (cost $1,551,177 and $1,279,779)

  1,551,326  1,279,855 

Receivables, net:

       

Brokers and dealers

  408,037  291,276 

Brokerage clients

  942,034  782,697 

Fees

  265,685  265,248 

Investments:

       

Long-term incentive compensation-related

  122,977  176,370 

Other

  609,357  618,924 

Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net

  196,125  273,104 

Goodwill

  2,954,327  2,954,327 

Intangible assets, net

  169,208  190,000 

Deferred sales commissions, net

  95,430  59,999 

Other assets

  173,362  177,908 
      

Total assets

 $8,115,050 $7,708,389 
      

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL

       

Liabilities:

       

Payables:

       

Brokers and dealers

 $220,736 $279,655 

Securities sold not yet purchased

  63,838  39,307 

Brokerage clients

  2,563,061  1,895,972 

AllianceBernstein mutual funds

  156,679  122,151 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

  499,076  362,570 

Accrued compensation and benefits

  485,229  534,344 

Debt

  323,163  444,903 
      

Total liabilities

  4,311,782  3,678,902 
      

Commitments and contingencies (See Note 13)

       

Capital:

       

General Partner

  41,213  42,632 

Limited partners: 277,600,901 and 277,847,588 units issued and outstanding

  4,165,461  4,306,760 

Capital contributions receivable from General Partner

  (8,441) (12,135)

Holding Units held for long-term incentive compensation plans

  (389,941) (323,382)

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  (48,526) (38,413)
      

Partners' capital attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

  3,759,766  3,975,462 

Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities

  43,502  54,025 
      

Total capital

  3,803,268  4,029,487 
      

Total liabilities and capital

 $8,115,050 $7,708,389 
      

   

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in thousands, except per unit amounts)
 

Revenues:

          

Investment advisory and services fees

 $1,772,257 $1,916,419 $2,051,692 

Bernstein research services

  413,707  437,414  430,521 

Distribution revenues

  401,706  351,621  338,597 

Dividend and interest income

  21,286  21,499  22,902 

Investment gains (losses)

  29,202  (82,081) (1,410)

Other revenues

  101,801  107,569  109,803 
        

Total revenues

  2,739,959  2,752,441  2,952,105 

Less: Interest expense

  3,222  2,550  3,548 
        

Net revenues

  2,736,737  2,749,891  2,948,557 
        

Expenses:

          

Employee compensation and benefits:

          

Employee compensation and benefits

  1,168,645  1,246,898  1,320,495 

Long-term incentive compensation charge

    587,131   

Promotion and servicing:

          

Distribution-related payments

  367,090  302,684  286,676 

Amortization of deferred sales commissions

  40,262  37,675  47,397 

Other

  202,191  219,197  193,822 

General and administrative:

          

General and administrative

  508,364  533,578  516,185 

Real estate charges

  223,038  7,235  101,698 

Interest on borrowings

  3,429  2,545  2,078 

Amortization of intangible assets

  21,353  21,417  21,344 
        

Total expenses

  2,534,372  2,958,360  2,489,695 
        

Operating income (loss)

  202,365  (208,469) 458,862 

Non-operating income

  
  
  
6,760
 
        

Income (loss) before income taxes

  202,365  (208,469) 465,622 

Income tax expense

  
13,764
  
3,098
  
38,523
 
        

Net income (loss)

  188,601  (211,567) 427,099 

Net (loss) income of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests

  
(315

)
 
(36,799

)
 
(15,320

)
        

Net income (loss) attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $188,916 $(174,768)$442,419 
        

Net income (loss) per AllianceBernstein Unit:

          

Basic

 $0.67 $(0.62)$1.59 
        

Diluted

 $0.67 $(0.62)$1.58 
        

   

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Net income (loss)

 $188,601 $(211,567)$427,099 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

          

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  (1,253) 1,802  3,470 

Income tax benefit (expense)

  796  (1,405) (510)
        

Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax

  (457) 397  2,960 

Unrealized gains on investments:

          

Unrealized gains arising during period

  1,375  225  751 

Less: reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income

  47  (34) 47 
        

Changes in unrealized gains on investments

  1,328  259  704 

Income tax (expense) benefit

  (780) 302  (247)
        

Unrealized gains on investments, net of tax

  548  561  457 

Changes in employee benefit related items:

          

Amortization of transition asset

  (143) (143) (143)

Amortization of prior service cost

  107  107  (845 

Recognized actuarial loss (gain)

  (10,074) (15,408) (9,213)
        

Changes in employee benefit related items

  (10,110) (15,444) (10,201)

Income tax (expense) benefit

  (134) 340  112 
        

Employee benefit related items, net of tax

  (10,244) (15,104) (10,089)
        

Other comprehensive income (loss)

  (10,153) (14,146) (6,672)

Less: Comprehensive (loss) income in consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests

  (354) (37,316) (12,053)
        

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $178,802 $(188,397)$432,480 
        

   

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in thousands)
 

General Partner's Capital

          

Balance, beginning of year

 $42,632 $48,986 $48,671 

Net income (loss)

  1,889  (1,748) 4,424 

Cash distributions to General Partner

  (3,226) (4,775) (4,978)

Long-term incentive compensation plans activity

  (82) 132  954 

Retirement of AllianceBernstein Units

      (85)

Purchase of Australian joint venture non-controlled interest

    37   
        

Balance, end of year

  41,213  42,632  48,986 
        

Limited Partners' Capital

          

Balance, beginning of year

  4,306,760  4,905,037  4,862,158 

Net income (loss)

  187,027  (173,020) 437,995 

Cash distributions to unitholders

  (318,208) (471,691) (490,118)

Long-term incentive compensation plans activity

  (6,923) 49,290  103,438 

Retirement of AllianceBernstein Units

  (3,195) (6,522) (8,436)

Purchase of Australian joint venture non-controlled interest

    3,666   
        

Balance, end of year

  4,165,461  4,306,760  4,905,037 
        

Capital Contributions Receivable

          

Balance, beginning of year

  (12,135) (15,973) (19,664)

Capital contributions from General Partner

  4,440  4,793  4,879 

Compensation plan accrual

  (746) (955) (1,188)
        

Balance, end of year

  (8,441) (12,135) (15,973)
        

Holding Units held for Long-term Incentive Compensation Plans

          

Balance, beginning of year

  (323,382) (535,410) (338,941)

Purchases of Holding Units to fund long-term compensation plans, net

  (238,015) (220,813) (226,370)

Reclassification from liability-based awards

  130,281     

Issuance of Holding Units to fund long-term incentive compensation plan awards, net of forfeitures

      (78,506)

Amortization of long-term incentive compensation awards

  20,661  437,743  113,548 

Re-valuation of Holding Units held in rabbi trust

  20,514  (4,902) (5,141)
        

Balance, end of year

  (389,941) (323,382) (535,410)
        

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

          

Balance, beginning of year

  (38,413) (31,801) (21,862)

Unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net of tax

  548  528  348 

Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax

  (418) 7,964  (199)

Changes in employee benefit related items, net of tax

  (10,243) (15,104) (10,088)
        

Balance, end of year

  (48,526) (38,413) (31,801)
        

Total Partners' Capital attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

  3,759,766  3,975,462  4,370,839 
        

Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities

          

Balance, beginning of year

  54,025  124,517  171,593 

Net (loss) income

  (315) (36,799) (15,320)

Unrealized gain (loss) on investments

    33  108 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

  (39) (550) 3,159 

Acquisitions

  (1) (32,103)  

Distributions to non-controlling interests of our consolidated venture capital fund activities

  (10,168) (1,073) (35,023)
        

Balance, end of year

  43,502  54,025  124,517 
        

Total Capital

 $3,803,268 $4,029,487 $4,495,356 
        

   

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Cash flows from operating activities:

          

Net income (loss)

 $188,601 $(211,567)$427,099 

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

          

Amortization of deferred sales commissions

  40,262  37,675  47,397 

Amortization of non-cash long-term incentive compensation

  21,830  474,103  122,612 

Depreciation and other amortization

  76,257  83,489  81,697 

Unrealized (gains) losses on long-term incentive compensation-related investments

  (15,395) 12,037  (39,094)

Unrealized (gains) losses on consolidated venture capital fund

  (18,233) 38,974  39,534 

Unrealized (gains) losses on other investments

  (40,541) 23,535  (10,414)

Real estate asset write-off charges

  41,450  4,639  25,521 

Other, net

  1,552  5,069  3,722 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

          

(Increase) in segregated cash and securities

  (271,471) (169,964) (124,560)

(Increase) decrease in receivables

  (226,553) 1,164  (399,549)

Decrease (increase) in investments

  136,901  (110,600  24,062 

(Increase) in deferred sales commissions

  (75,693) (21,518) (33,366)

Decrease (increase) in other assets

  4,363  (26,048  26,223 

Increase in payables

  613,345  284,680  543,638 

Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses

  137,898  (26,343) 86,567 

Increase in accrued compensation and benefits

  69,406  178,870  9,045 
        

Net cash provided by operating activities

  683,979  578,195  830,134 
        

Cash flows from investing activities:

          

Purchases of investments

  (108) (56) (73)

Proceeds from sales of investments

  780  3,507  4,349 

Purchases of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements

  (21,650) (39,590) (25,302)

Proceeds from sales of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements

  2,636  1,251  1,801 

Purchase of businesses, net of cash acquired

    (41,835) (14,298)
        

Net cash used in investing activities

  (18,342  (76,723  (33,523 
        

Cash flows from financing activities:

          

(Repayment) issuance of commercial paper, net

  (123,250) 219,363  (24,247)

(Decrease) increase in overdrafts payable

  (244) (38,640) 15,278 

Distributions to General Partner and unitholders

  (321,434) (476,466) (495,096)

Distributions to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities

  (10,168) (1,073) (35,023)

Capital contributions from General Partner

  4,440  4,793  4,879 

Additional investments by Holding with proceeds from exercise of compensatory options to buy Holding Units

    1,478  8,287 

Additional investments by Holding from distributions paid to AllianceBernstein consolidated rabbi trust

  11,595  5,727  2,205 

Purchases of Holding Units to fund long-term incentive compensation plan awards, net

  (238,015) (220,813) (226,370)

Purchases of AllianceBernstein Units

  (3,195) (6,522) (8,521)

Debt issuance costs

  (1,933) (69) (1,932)

Other

  (31) (26) (51)
        

Net cash used in financing activities

  (682,235) (512,248) (760,591)
        

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  5,099  (734) (45)
        

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

  (11,499) (11,510) 35,975 

Cash and cash equivalents as of beginning of the period

  638,681  650,191  614,216 
        

Cash and cash equivalents as of end of the period

 $627,182 $638,681 $650,191 
        

Cash paid:

          

Interest paid

 $4,809 $3,001 $3,721 

Income taxes paid

  10,063  29,477  43,072 

Non-cash investing activities:

          

Fair value of assets acquired

    30,368  49,041 

Fair value of liabilities assumed

    (4,999) (34,743)

   

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

        The words "we" and "our" refer collectively to AllianceBernstein L.P. and its subsidiaries ("AllianceBernstein"), or to their officers and employees. Similarly, the word "company" refers to AllianceBernstein. Cross-references are in italics.

1. Business Description and Organization

        We provide research, diversified investment management and related services globally to a broad range of clients. Our principal services include:

        We also provide distribution, shareholder servicing and administrative services to the mutual funds we sponsor.

        Our high-quality, in-depth research is the foundation of our business. Our research disciplines include fundamental, quantitative and economic research and currency forecasting. In addition, we have created several specialized research initiatives, including research examining global strategic developments that can affect multiple industries and geographies.

        We provide a broad range of investment services with expertise in:

        We provide these services using various investment disciplines, including market capitalization (e.g., large-, mid- and small-cap equities), term (e.g., long-, intermediate- and short-duration debt


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

1. Business Description and Organization (Continued)

securities), and geography (e.g., U.S., international, global and emerging markets), as well as local and regional disciplines in major markets around the world.

        As of December 31, 2012, AXA,société anonyme organized under the laws of France and the holding company for an international group of insurance and related financial services companies, through certain of its subsidiaries ("AXA and its subsidiaries") owned approximately 1.4% of the issued and outstanding units representing assignments of beneficial ownership of limited partnership interests in AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. ("Holding Units").

        As of December 31, 2012, the ownership structure of AllianceBernstein, expressed as a percentage of general and limited partnership interests, was as follows:

AXA and its subsidiaries

  61.0%

Holding

  37.5 

Unaffiliated holders

  1.5 
    

  100.0%
    

        AllianceBernstein Corporation (an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of AXA, "General Partner") is the general partner of both AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. ("Holding") and AllianceBernstein. AllianceBernstein Corporation owns 100,000 general partnership units in Holding and a 1% general partnership interest in AllianceBernstein. Including both the general partnership and limited partnership interests in Holding and AllianceBernstein, AXA and its subsidiaries had an approximate 65.5% economic interest in AllianceBernstein as of December 31, 2012.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

        The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

        The consolidated financial statements include AllianceBernstein and its majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries. All significant inter-company transactions and balances among the consolidated entities have been eliminated.

        In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2011-04,Fair Value Measurement. The changes to the existing guidance included how and when the valuation premise of highest and best use applies, the application of premiums and discounts, as well as new required disclosures (included in Note 9). We adopted this standard on January 1, 2012 and there was no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05,Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This standard eliminated the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. An entity can elect to present items of net income and other comprehensive income in one continuous statement or in two separate, but consecutive statements. This standard did not change the items that constitute net income and other comprehensive income, when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income or the earnings per unit computation (which will continue to be based on net income). We adopted this standard on January 1, 2012 utilizing the two statement approach and there was no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

        In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08,Testing Goodwill for Impairment. The revised standard was intended to reduce the cost and complexity of the annual goodwill impairment test by providing entities an option to perform a "qualitative" assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2012 and there was no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

        We reclassified prior period Private Client commissions representing payments to third parties, from employee compensation and benefits expense in the consolidated statements of income to other promotion and servicing expense to conform to the current year's presentation. In addition, unrealized gains (losses) on other investments, previously included in other adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows, is currently shown separately.

        During 2012, we identified an error in the classification of Holding's cash distributions to us on unallocated Holding Units held in our consolidated rabbi trust. As such, we revised the classification of prior period amounts recorded for Holding's cash distributions to us on unallocated Holding Units held in our consolidated rabbi trust from due to Holding to additional investments by Holding in AllianceBernstein in partners' capital in the consolidated statements of financial condition. In addition, changes in due to Holding included in cash flows from operating activities in prior periods are now presented as additional investments by Holding in AllianceBernstein included in cash flows from financing activities. As of December 31, 2012, the cumulative impact of the revision on partners' capital in the consolidated statement of financial condition was $7.9 million. The impact of the revision for 2011 and 2010 in the consolidated statements of cash flows was $5.7 million and $2.2 million, respectively. Management concluded that the error did not, individually or in the aggregate, result in a material misstatement of AllianceBernstein's consolidated financial statements for any prior period.

        In accordance with ASU 2009-17,Consolidation (Topic 810)—Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities, the determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity's purpose and design, a company's ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, and whether a company is obligated to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the entity. The standard also requires ongoing assessments of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity ("VIE"). The provisions of this


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

standard became effective January 1, 2010. In January 2010, the FASB deferred portions of ASU 2009-17 that relate to asset managers. We determined that all entities for which we are a sponsor and/or investment manager, other than collateralized debt obligations and collateralized loan obligations (collectively "CDOs"), qualify for the scope deferral and will continue to be assessed for consolidation under prior accounting guidance for consolidation of variable interest entities.

        As of December 31, 2012, we were the investment manager for five CDOs that meet the definition of a VIE due primarily to the lack of unilateral decision-making authority of the equity holders. The CDOs are alternative investment vehicles created for the sole purpose of issuing collateralized debt instruments that offer investors the opportunity for returns that vary with the risk level of their investment. Our management fee structure for these CDOs will typically include a senior management fee, and may also include subordinated and incentive management fees. We hold no equity interest in any of these CDOs. For each of the CDOs, we evaluated the management fee structure, the current and expected economic performance of the entities and other provisions included in the governing documents of the CDOs that might restrict or guarantee an expected loss or residual return. In accordance with ASC 810,Consolidation, we concluded that our investment management contract does not represent a variable interest in four of the five CDOs. As such, we are not required to consolidate these entities.

        For the remaining CDO, we concluded our collateral management agreement represented a variable interest primarily due to the level of subordinated fees. We evaluated whether we possessed both of the following characteristics of a controlling financial interest: (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. We determined that we possessed the decision-making power noted in criteria (1).

        In evaluating criteria (2), we considered all facts regarding the design, terms and characteristics of the CDO and concluded that we do not meet the criteria. Our conclusion was based on the following quantitative and qualitative factors: (a) we have no involvement with the CDO beyond providing investment management services, (b) we hold no equity or debt interests in the CDO, (c) we are not a transferor of any of the assets of the CDO, (d) our expected aggregate fees in future periods are insignificant relative to the expected cash flows of the CDO, (e) the variability of our expected fees in relation to the expected cash flows of the CDO is insignificant, (f) our maximum exposure to loss for the CDO is our investment management fee, which is based upon the fair value of the CDO's assets, (g) the CDO has no recourse against us for any losses sustained in the CDO structure, (h) we have not provided, nor do we expect to provide, any financial or other support to the CDO, and (i) there are no liquidity arrangements, guarantees and/or other commitments by third parties that would impact our variable interest in the CDO. As such, we do not have a controlling financial interest in the CDO and we should not consolidate the CDO into our consolidated financial statements. The cash, collateral investments (at fair value) and notes payable (at amortized cost) as of December 31, 2012 of this CDO were $21.4 million, $313.8 million and $317.1 million, respectively.

        For the entities that meet the scope deferral, management reviews its agreements quarterly and its investments in, and other financial arrangements with, certain entities that hold client assets under management ("AUM") to determine the variable interest entities that the company is required to consolidate. These entities include certain mutual fund products, hedge funds, structured products,


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

group trusts, collective investment trusts and limited partnerships. We earn investment management fees on AUM of these entities, but we derive no other benefit from the AUM and cannot use them in our operations.

        As of December 31, 2012, we have significant variable interests in certain structured products and hedge funds with approximately $21.9 million in AUM. However, these VIEs do not require consolidation because management has determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of the expected losses or expected residual returns of these entities. Our maximum exposure to loss is limited to our investment of $0.1 million in these entities.

        Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, demand deposits, money market accounts, overnight commercial paper and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Due to the short-term nature of these instruments, the recorded value has been determined to approximate fair value.

        Fees receivable are shown net of allowances. An allowance for doubtful accounts related to investment advisory and services fees is determined through an analysis of the aging of receivables, assessments of collectibility based on historical trends and other qualitative and quantitative factors, including the following: our relationship with the client, the financial health (or ability to pay) of the client, current economic conditions and whether the account is closed or active. The allowance for doubtful accounts is not material to fees receivable.

        Customers' securities transactions are recorded on a settlement date basis, with related commission income and expenses reported on a trade date basis. Receivables from and payables to clients include amounts due on cash and margin transactions. Securities owned by customers are held as collateral for receivables; such collateral is not reflected in the consolidated financial statements. We have the ability by contract or custom to sell or re-pledge this collateral, and have done so at various times. As of December 31, 2012, the fair value of these securities re-pledged was $2.7 million. Principal securities transactions and related expenses are recorded on a trade date basis.

        Securities borrowed and securities loaned by Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., LLC ("SCB LLC") and Sanford C. Bernstein Limited ("SCBL"), each of which is our indirect wholly owned subsidiary, are recorded at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received in connection with the transaction and are included in receivables from and payables to brokers and dealers in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Securities borrowed transactions require SCB LLC and SCBL to deposit cash collateral with the lender. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, cash collateral on deposit with lenders was $106.3 million and $34.9 million, respectively. With respect to securities loaned, SCB LLC and SCBL receive cash collateral from the borrower. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, cash collateral received from borrowers was $12.5 million and $151.6 million, respectively. The initial collateral advanced or received approximates or is greater than the fair value of securities borrowed or loaned. SCB LLC and SCBL monitor the fair value of the securities borrowed and loaned on a daily basis and request additional collateral or return excess collateral, as appropriate. As of December 31, 2012 and


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

2011, there is no allowance provision required for the collateral advanced. Income or expense is recognized over the life of the transactions.

        As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had $25.8 million and $16.8 million, respectively, of cash on deposit with clearing organizations for trade facilitation purposes. In addition, as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, SCB LLC held U.S. Treasury Bills with values totaling $28.0 million and $38.0 million, respectively, in its investment account which are pledged as collateral with clearing organizations. These clearing organizations have the ability by contract or custom to sell or re-pledge this collateral.

        Investments include United States Treasury Bills, unconsolidated mutual funds and limited partnership hedge funds we sponsor and manage, various separately managed portfolios comprised of equity and fixed income securities, exchange-traded options and investments owned by a consolidated venture capital fund in which we own a controlling interest as the general partner and a 10% limited partnership interest.

        Investments in United States Treasury Bills, mutual funds, and equity and fixed income securities are classified as either trading or available-for-sale securities. Trading investments are stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported in investment gains and losses on the consolidated statements of income. Available-for-sale investments are stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income in partners' capital. Realized gains and losses on the sale of investments are reported in investment gains and losses on the consolidated statements of income. Average cost is used to determine realized gain or loss on investments sold.

        We use the equity method of accounting for investments in limited partnership hedge funds. The equity in earnings of our limited partnership hedge fund investments is reported in investment gains and losses on the consolidated statements of income.

        The investments owned by our consolidated venture capital fund are generally illiquid and are initially valued at cost. These investments are adjusted to fair value to reflect the occurrence of "significant developments" (i.e., capital transactions or business, economic or market events). Adjustments to fair value are reported in investment gains and losses on the consolidated statements of income. There are three private equity investments that we own directly outside of our consolidated venture capital fund. One of the investments is accounted for using the cost method; the other two are accounted for at fair value.

        SeeNote 9 for a description of how we measure the fair value of our investments.

        Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is recognized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of eight years for furniture and three to six years for equipment and software. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of their estimated useful lives or the terms of the related leases.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        In 2000, AllianceBernstein acquired the business and assets of SCB Inc., an investment research and management company formerly known as Sanford C. Bernstein Inc. ("Bernstein"), and assumed the liabilities of Bernstein ("Bernstein Transaction"). The purchase price consisted of a cash payment of approximately $1.5 billion and 40.8 million newly issued AllianceBernstein Units. The Bernstein Transaction was accounted for under the purchase method and the cost of the acquisition was allocated on the basis of the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired, net of liabilities assumed, resulted in the recognition of goodwill of approximately $3.0 billion.

        As of December 31, 2012, goodwill of $3.0 billion on the consolidated statement of financial condition included $2.8 billion as a result of the Bernstein Transaction and $154 million in regard to various smaller acquisitions. We have determined that AllianceBernstein has only one reporting segment and reporting unit.

        We test our goodwill annually, as of September 30, for impairment. As of September 30, 2012, the impairment test indicated that goodwill was not impaired. The carrying value of goodwill is also reviewed if facts and circumstances occur that suggest possible impairment, such as significant declines in AUM, revenues, earnings or the price of a Holding Unit.

        The impairment test is a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test is used to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of AllianceBernstein, the reporting unit, with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not performed. However, if the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit to the aggregated fair values of its individual assets and liabilities to determine the amount of impairment, if any.

        As of September 30, 2012, AllianceBernstein estimated its fair value under both the market approach and income approach. The types of assumptions and methodologies used under both approaches were consistent with those used in impairment tests performed in prior periods. Under the market approach, the fair value of the reporting unit was based on its unadjusted market valuation (AllianceBernstein Units outstanding multiplied by the price of a Holding Unit) and adjusted market valuations assuming a control premium and earnings multiples. The price of a publicly traded AllianceBernstein Holding Unit serves as a reasonable starting point for valuing an AllianceBernstein Unit because each represents the same fractional interest in our underlying business. On an unadjusted basis, AllianceBernstein's fair value per unit as of September 30, 2012 was $15.41 (the price of a Holding Unit as of that date) as compared to its carrying value, or book value, of $14.09 per unit. Also under the market approach, we typically assume a control premium of 10% - 20% for the reporting unit, which was determined based on an analysis of control premiums for relevant recent acquisitions, as well as comparable industry earnings multiples applied to our current earnings forecast. A control premium was not needed in this analysis for fair value to exceed carrying value. Under the income approach, the fair value of the reporting unit was based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Determining estimated fair value using a discounted cash flow valuation technique consists of applying business growth rate assumptions over the estimated life of the goodwill asset and then discounting the resulting expected cash flows using an estimated weighted average cost of capital of


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

market participants to arrive at a present value amount that approximates fair value. In our tests, our discounted expected cash flow model used management's current five-year business plan, which factored in current market conditions and all material events that had impacted, or that we believed at the time could potentially impact, future expected cash flows and a declining annual growth rate thereafter for three years before using a terminal value growth rate. We ran multiple discounted cash flow analyses under several scenarios. We used a weighted average cost of equity ranging from 7% to 10% as the discount rate. We used a cost of equity rate, as opposed to a cost of capital, due to using net income in our expected cash flow model (as a result of generally distributing 100% of our earnings). The cost of debt is already factored into the net income projections. We used terminal value growth rates ranging from 2% to 4%, and we used our business plan growth rates as a base case and at stressed levels approximately 50% lower, as a result of current economic uncertainty and market dynamics.

        Management considered the results of the market approach and income approach analysis performed along with a number of other factors (including current market conditions) and determined that AllianceBernstein's fair value exceeded its carrying value as of September 30, 2012 by approximately 9% using the market approach (excluding any control premium), and by more than 50% using the income approach (using the most stressed scenarios). As such, no goodwill impairment existed and the second step of the goodwill impairment test was not required.

        As a result of increased economic uncertainty and current market dynamics, determining whether an impairment of the goodwill asset exists requires management to exercise significant judgment. In addition, to the extent that securities valuations are depressed for prolonged periods of time and market conditions worsen, or if we experience significant net redemptions, our AUM, revenues, profitability and unit price may be adversely affected. Although the price of a Holding Unit is just one factor in the calculation of fair value, if current Holding Unit price levels decline significantly, reaching the conclusion that fair value exceeds carrying value will, over time, become more difficult. In addition, control premiums, industry earnings multiples and discount rates are impacted by economic conditions. As a result, subsequent impairment tests may occur more frequently and be based on more negative assumptions and future cash flow projections, and may result in an impairment of goodwill. Any impairment could reduce materially the recorded amount of this asset, with a corresponding charge to our earnings.

        Intangible assets consist primarily of costs assigned to acquired investment management contracts of SCB Inc. based on their estimated fair value at the time of acquisition, less accumulated amortization. As of December 31, 2012, intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, of $169.2 million on the consolidated statement of financial condition was composed of $166.7 million of definite-lived intangible assets subject to amortization, of which $160.4 million relates to the Bernstein Transaction, and $2.5 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets not subject to amortization in regard to a smaller acquisition. Intangible assets are recognized at fair value and are generally amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful life of approximately 20 years. The gross carrying amount of intangible assets totaled $425.3 million as of December 31, 2012 and $424.7 million as of December 31, 2011, and accumulated amortization was $256.1 million as of December 31, 2012 and $234.7 million as of December 31, 2011, resulting in the net carrying amount of intangible assets subject to amortization of $169.2 million as of December 31, 2012 and $190.0 million as of


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

December 31, 2011. Amortization expense was $21.4 million for 2012, $21.4 million for 2011 and $21.3 million for 2010. Estimated annual amortization expense for each of the next five years is approximately $22 million.

        We periodically review intangible assets for impairment as events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If the carrying value exceeds fair value, additional impairment tests are performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any.

        We pay commissions to financial intermediaries in connection with the sale of shares of open-end company-sponsored mutual funds sold without a front-end sales charge ("back-end load shares"). These commissions are capitalized as deferred sales commissions and amortized over periods not exceeding five and one-half years for U.S. fund shares and four years for non-U.S. fund shares, the periods of time during which deferred sales commissions are generally recovered. We recover these commissions from distribution services fees received from those funds and from contingent deferred sales commissions ("CDSC") received from shareholders of those funds upon the redemption of their shares. CDSC cash recoveries are recorded as reductions of unamortized deferred sales commissions when received. Since January 31, 2009, our U.S. mutual funds have not offered back-end load shares to new investors. However, our non-U.S. funds continue to offer back-end load shares.

        We periodically review the deferred sales commission asset for impairment as events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If the carrying value exceeds fair value, additional impairment tests are performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any.

        With respect to all significant litigation matters, we consider the likelihood of a negative outcome. If we determine the likelihood of a negative outcome is probable, and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, we record an estimated loss for the expected outcome of the litigation. If the likelihood of a negative outcome is reasonably possible and we are able to determine an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss in excess of amounts already accrued, if any, we disclose that fact together with the estimate of the possible loss or range of loss. However, it is often difficult to predict the outcome or estimate a possible loss or range of loss because litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, particularly when plaintiffs allege substantial or indeterminate damages, the litigation is in its early stages, or when the litigation is highly complex or broad in scope. In such cases, we disclose that we are unable to predict the outcome or estimate a possible loss or range of loss.

        Investment advisory and services fees, generally calculated as a percentage of AUM, are recorded as revenue as the related services are performed. Certain investment advisory contracts, including those associated with hedge funds or other alternative investments, provide for a performance-based fee, in addition to a base advisory fee, which is calculated as either a percentage of absolute investment results or a percentage of investment results in excess of a stated benchmark over a specified period of time. Performance-based fees are recorded as a component of revenue at the end of each contract's measurement period.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        We calculate AUM using established fair valuation methodologies, including market-based valuation methods and fair valuation methods. Market-based valuation methods include: last sale/settle prices from an exchange for actively traded listed equities, options and futures; evaluated bid prices from recognized pricing vendors for fixed income, asset-backed or mortgage-backed issues; mid prices from recognized pricing vendors and brokers for credit default swaps; and quoted bids or spreads from pricing vendors and brokers for other derivative products. Fair valuation methods include discounted cash flow models, evaluation of assets versus liabilities or any other methodology that is validated and approved by our Valuation Committee. Fair valuation methods are used only where AUM cannot be valued using market-based valuation methods, such as in the case of private equity or illiquid securities. Investments utilizing fair valuation methods typically make up an insignificant amount of our total AUM. Recent market volatility has not had a significant effect on our ability to acquire market data and, accordingly, our ability to use market-based valuation methods.

        The Valuation Committee, which is composed of senior officers and employees, is responsible for overseeing the pricing and valuation of all investments held in client and AllianceBernstein portfolios. The Valuation Committee has adopted a Statement of Pricing Policies describing principles and policies that apply to pricing and valuing investments held in these portfolios. We have also established a Pricing Group, which reports to the Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee has delegated to the Pricing Group responsibility for overseeing the pricing process for all investments.

        Bernstein Research Services revenue consists primarily of brokerage commissions received by SCB LLC and SCBL for research and brokerage-related services provided to institutional investors. Brokerage commissions earned and related expenses are recorded on a trade-date basis.

        Distribution revenues, shareholder servicing fees (included in other revenues), and dividend and interest income are accrued as earned.

        Purchases and sales of shares of company-sponsored mutual funds in connection with the underwriting activities of our subsidiaries, including related commission income, are recorded on trade date. Receivables from brokers and dealers for sale of shares of company-sponsored mutual funds are generally realized within three business days from trade date, in conjunction with the settlement of the related payables to company-sponsored mutual funds for share purchases. Distribution plan and other promotion and servicing payments are recognized as expense when incurred.

        We maintain several unfunded, non-qualified long-term incentive compensation plans under which annual awards to employees are made generally in the fourth quarter.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        For awards made before 2009, participants were permitted to allocate their awards: (i) among notional investments in Holding Units, certain of the investment services we provided to our clients and a money market fund or (ii) under limited circumstances, in options to buy Holding Units.

        Awards in 2010 and 2009 consisted solely of restricted Holding Units and deferred cash. (In 2010, deferred cash was an option available only to certain non-U.S. employees.)

        Awards in December 2012 and 2011 allowed participants to allocate their awards between restricted Holding Units and deferred cash. Participants (except certain members of senior management) generally could allocate up to 50% of their awards to deferred cash, not to exceed a total of $250,000 per award, and had until mid-January 2013 and 2012, respectively, to make their elections.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

The number of restricted Holding Units issued equaled the remaining dollar value of the award divided by the average of the closing prices of a Holding Unit for a five business day period in January after participants made their elections each year.

        During the fourth quarter of 2011, we implemented changes to our employee long-term incentive compensation award program to ensure that our compensation practices are competitive, and to better align the costs of employee compensation and benefits with our current year financial performance and provide employees with a higher degree of certainty that they will receive the incentive compensation they are awarded. Specifically, we amended all outstanding year-end long-term incentive compensation awards of active employees, so that employees who terminate their employment or are terminated without cause may retain their award, subject to compliance with certain agreements and restrictive covenants set forth in the applicable award agreement, including restrictions on competition and employee and client solicitation, and a claw-back for failing to follow existing risk management policies. Most equity replacement, sign-on or similar deferred compensation awards included in separate employment agreements or arrangements were not amended in 2011 to reflect these changes.

        We recognize compensation expense related to equity compensation grants in the financial statements using the fair value method. Fair value of restricted Holding Unit awards is the closing price of a Holding Unit on the grant date; fair value of options is determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Under the fair value method, compensatory expense is measured at the grant date based on the estimated fair value of the award and is recognized over the required service period. Prior to the changes made to the employee long-term incentive compensation award program in the fourth quarter of 2011, an employee's service requirement was typically the same as the delivery dates. These changes eliminated employee service requirements, but did not modify delivery dates contained in the original award agreements.

        As a result of these changes, we recorded a one-time, non-cash charge of $587.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2011 for all unrecognized long-term incentive compensation on the amended outstanding awards from prior years. In addition, upon approval and communication of the dollar value of the 2011 awards in December 2011, we recorded 100% of the expense associated with our 2011 long-term incentive compensation awards of $159.9 million. In January 2012, 8.7 million restricted Holding Units held in the consolidated rabbi trust were awarded for the 2011 awards and we reclassified $130.3 million of the liability to partners' capital as equity-based awards.

        During 2012, we recorded $150.1 million of expense associated with our 2012 long-term incentive compensation awards. In January 2013, 6.5 million restricted Holding Units held in the consolidated rabbi trust were awarded for the 2012 awards and we reclassified $129.2 million of the liability to partners' capital as equity-based awards.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

        Awards granted in 2012 and 2011 contained the provisions described above and we expect to include these provisions in long-term incentive compensation awards in future years. Accordingly, our annual incentive compensation expense will reflect 100% of the expense associated with the long-term incentive compensation awarded in each year. This approach to expense recognition will more closely match the economic cost of awarding long-term incentive compensation to the period in which the related service is performed.

        Grants of restricted Holding Units and options to buy Holding Units are typically awarded to eligible members of the Board of Directors ("Eligible Directors") of the General Partner during the second quarter. Restricted Holding Units vest on the third anniversary of the grant date and the options become exercisable ratably over three years. These restricted Holding Units and options are not forfeitable (except if the Eligible Director is terminated for "Cause," as that term is defined in the applicable award agreement). Due to there being no service requirement, we fully expense these awards on each grant date.

        We fund our restricted Holding Unit awards either by purchasing Holding Units on the open market or purchasing newly issued Holding Units from Holding, all of which are then held in a consolidated rabbi trust until they are distributed to employees upon vesting. In accordance with the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AllianceBernstein ("AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement"), when AllianceBernstein purchases newly issued Holding Units from Holding, Holding is required to use the proceeds it receives from AllianceBernstein to purchase the equivalent number of newly issued AllianceBernstein Units, thus increasing its percentage ownership interest in AllianceBernstein. Holding Units held in the consolidated rabbi trust are corporate assets in the name of the trust and are available to the general creditors of AllianceBernstein.

        During 2012 and 2011, we purchased 15.7 million and 13.5 million Holding Units for $238.0 million and $220.8 million, respectively. These amounts reflect open-market purchases of 12.3 million and 11.1 million Holding Units for $182.3 million and $192.1 million, respectively, with the remainder relating to purchases of Holding Units from employees to allow them to fulfill statutory tax withholding requirements at the time of distribution of long-term incentive compensation awards, offset by Holding Units purchased by employees as part of a distribution reinvestment election.

        Since the third quarter of 2011, we have implemented plans each quarter to repurchase Holding Units pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"). A Rule 10b5-1 plan allows a company to repurchase its shares at times when it otherwise might be prevented from doing so because of self-imposed trading blackout periods and because it possesses material non-public information. Each broker we select has the authority under the terms and limitations specified in the plan to repurchase Holding Units on our behalf in accordance with the terms of the plan. Repurchases are subject to SEC regulations as well as certain price, market volume and timing constraints specified in the plan. The plan adopted during the fourth quarter of 2012 does not specify an aggregate limitation and expires at the close of business on February 11, 2013. We intend to adopt additional Rule 10b5-1 plans so that we can continue to engage in open-market purchases of Holding Units to help fund anticipated obligations under our incentive compensation award program and for other corporate purposes.

        We granted to employees and Eligible Directors 12.1 million restricted Holding Unit awards (including 2.7 million granted in June 2012 to Peter Kraus, our Chief Executive Officer, in connection with his extended employment agreement and 8.7 million granted in January 2012 for 2011 year-end


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

awards) and 1.7 million restricted Holding Unit awards during 2012 and 2011, respectively. To fund these awards, we allocated previously repurchased Holding Units that had been held in the consolidated rabbi trust. The 2012 and 2011 long-term incentive compensation awards allowed most employees to allocate their awards between restricted Holding Units and deferred cash. As a result, 6.5 million restricted Holding Unit awards for the December 2012 awards and 8.7 million restricted Holding Unit awards for the December 2011 awards were awarded and allocated as such within the consolidated rabbi trust in January 2013 and 2012, respectively. There were approximately 17.9 million and 12.0 million unallocated Holding Units remaining in the consolidated rabbi trust as of December 31, 2012 and January 31, 2013, respectively. The balance as of January 31, 2013 also reflects repurchases and other activity during January 2013.

        Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars ("US$") at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates, and related revenues and expenses are translated into US$ at average exchange rates in effect during each period. Net foreign currency gains and losses resulting from the translation of assets and liabilities of foreign operations into US$ are reported as a separate component of other comprehensive income in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Net foreign currency transaction gains (losses) were $(1.1) million, $(2.4) million and $1.3 million for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

        AllianceBernstein is required to distribute all of its Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement, to its Unitholders and to the General Partner. Available Cash Flow can be summarized as the cash flow received by AllianceBernstein from operations minus such amounts as the General Partner determines, in its sole discretion, should be retained by AllianceBernstein for use in its business, or plus such amounts as the General Partner determines, in its sole discretion, should be released from previously retained cash flow.

        The General Partner computes cash flow received from operations by determining the sum of:

and then subtracting from this amount the sum of:

        On February 12, 2013, the General Partner declared a distribution of $106.6 million, or $0.38 per AllianceBernstein Unit, representing a distribution of Available Cash Flow for the three months ended December 31, 2012. The General Partner, as a result of its 1% general partnership interest, is entitled


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

to receive 1% of each distribution. The distribution is payable on March 14, 2013 to holders of record on February 22, 2013. This distribution excludes $38.9 million of non-cash real estate charges recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012.

        Total cash distributions per Unit paid to the General Partner and Unitholders during 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $1.15, $1.70 and $1.79, respectively.

        We report all changes in comprehensive income in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Comprehensive income includes net income, as well as unrealized gains and losses on investments classified as available-for-sale, foreign currency translation adjustments, and unrecognized actuarial net losses and transition assets. Deferred taxes are not recognized on foreign currency translation adjustments for foreign subsidiaries whose earnings are considered permanently invested outside the United States.

3. Real Estate Charges

        Since the fourth quarter of 2008, we consistently have taken steps to reduce our cost structure, including headcount reductions, and the consolidation of office locations, in response to declines in our AUM and fee revenues.

        During 2010, we performed a comprehensive review of our real estate requirements in New York in connection with our workforce reductions commencing in 2008. As a result, during 2010 we decided to sub-lease over 380,000 square feet in New York (approximately 80% of this space has been sublet) and largely consolidate our New York-based employees into two office locations from three. We recorded pre-tax real estate charges of $101.7 million in 2010 that reflected the net present value of the difference between the amount of our ongoing contractual operating lease obligations for this space and our estimate of current market rental rates ($76.2 million), as well as the write-off of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment related to this space ($25.5 million). We periodically review the assumptions and estimates we used in recording these charges.

        During 2011, we recorded pre-tax real estate charges totaling $7.2 million for our office space in London, England, New York and other U.S. locations. The London charge was $8.8 million, consisting of a $5.8 million payment to the party to which the lease was assigned, as well as the write-off of $3.0 million of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment related to the space. We also wrote off an additional $1.5 million of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment related to the New York space and had miscellaneous charges of $0.4 million. These charges were offset by a $3.5 million credit we recorded in 2011 due to changes in estimates of our 2010 charge.

        During the first six months of 2012, we recorded pre-tax real estate charges totaling $16.1 million, reflecting $8.8 million resulting from the abandonment of our leased New York City Data Center office space and $7.3 million resulting from a change in estimates relating to previously recorded real estate charges. The New York City Data Center charge consisted of the net present value of the difference between the amount of ongoing contractual operating lease obligations for this space and our estimate of current market rental rates ($7.1 million) and the write-off of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment related to this space ($1.7 million).


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

3. Real Estate Charges (Continued)

        During the third quarter of 2012, in an effort to further reduce our global real estate footprint, we completed a comprehensive review of our worldwide office locations and began implementing a global space consolidation plan. As a result, our intention is to sub-lease approximately 510,000 square feet of office space, over 70% of which is New York office space (in addition to the 380,000 square feet written-off in 2010), with the remainder comprised of office space in London, England, Melbourne, Australia and various U.S. locations. We expect that the actions we are taking to vacate and market space for sublease will result over time in projected non-cash real estate charges of $225 million to $250 million, with the bulk of the charges having occurred in the third and fourth quarters of 2012. These charges are in addition to the earlier non-cash real estate charges for New York City office space we recorded, and they did not affect our third and fourth quarter 2012 distributions.

        During the third quarter of 2012, we recorded pre-tax real estate charges of $168.1 million, reflecting the net present value of the difference between the amount of our ongoing contractual operating lease obligations for this space and our estimate of current market rental rates ($131.8 million), as well as the write-off of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment related to this space ($31.3 million), and changes in estimates relating to previously recorded real estate charges ($5.0 million).

        During the fourth quarter of 2012, we recorded pre-tax real estate charges of $38.9 million, reflecting the net present value of the difference between the amount of our ongoing contractual operating lease obligations for this space and our estimate of current market rental rates ($32.0 million), as well as the write-off of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment related to this space ($8.4 million), offset by changes in estimates relating to previously recorded real estate charges of ($1.5 million).

        The following table summarizes the activity in the liability account relating to our 2010 and 2012 office space consolidation initiatives for the following periods:

 
 Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2012 2011 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Balance as of January 1,

 $71,164 $89,793 

Expense (credit) incurred

  181,589  (3,506)

Deferred rent

  27,000  2,288 

Payments made

  (42,833) (18,696)

Interest accretion

  1,864  1,285 
      

Balance as of end of period

 $238,784 $71,164 
      

4. Net Income (Loss) Per Unit

        Basic net income (loss) per unit is derived by reducing net income (loss) for the 1% general partnership interest and dividing the remaining 99% by the basic weighted average number of units outstanding for each year. Diluted net (loss) income per unit is derived by reducing net income (loss) for the 1% general partnership interest and dividing the remaining 99% by the total of the basic


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

4. Net Income (Loss) Per Unit (Continued)

weighted average number of units outstanding and the dilutive unit equivalents resulting from outstanding compensatory options to buy Holding Units as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in thousands, except per unit
amounts)

 

Net income (loss) attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $188,916 $(174,768)$442,419 
        

Weighted average units outstanding—basic

  277,721  278,018  275,415 

Dilutive effect of compensatory options to buy Holding Units

  1    1,639 
        

Weighted average units outstanding—diluted

  277,722  278,018  277,054 
        

Basic net income (loss) per AllianceBernstein Unit

 $0.67 $(0.62)$1.59 
        

Diluted net income (loss) per AllianceBernstein Unit

 $0.67 $(0.62)$1.58 
        

        For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, we excluded 8,438,902, 3,813,567 and 4,783,472 options, respectively, from the diluted net income (loss) per unit computation due to their anti-dilutive effect.

        The 2012 net income per unit includes $223.0 million of non-cash real estate charges recorded in 2012.See further discussion above in Note 3, Real Estate Charges.

        The 2011 net (loss) per unit includes the one-time, non-cash compensation charge of $587.1 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2011.See further discussion above in Note 2, Long-term Incentive Compensation Plans.

5. Cash and Securities Segregated Under Federal Regulations and Other Requirements

        As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, $1.5 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively, of United States Treasury Bills were segregated in a special reserve bank custody account for the exclusive benefit of brokerage customers of SCB LLC under Rule 15c3-3 of the Exchange Act.

        AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. ("AllianceBernstein Investments"), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein and the distributor of company-sponsored mutual funds, maintains several special bank accounts for the exclusive benefit of customers. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, $42.2 million and $39.9 million, respectively, of cash were segregated in these bank accounts.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

6. Fees Receivables, Net

        Fees receivable, net consists of:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 
 
 (in thousands)
 

AllianceBernstein mutual funds

 $154,415 $120,828 

Unaffiliated clients (net of allowance of $844 in 2012 and $752 in 2011)

  103,392  135,416 

Affiliated clients

  7,878  9,004 
      

Total fees receivables, net

 $265,685 $265,248 
      

7. Investments

        Investments consist of:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Available-for-sale (primarily seed capital)

 $13,361 $13,883 

Trading:

       

Long-term incentive compensation-related

  90,825  135,832 

United States Treasury Bills

  27,982  37,998 

Seed capital

  307,795  278,932 

Equities and exchange-traded options

  48,937  58,237 

Investments in limited partnership hedge funds:

       

Long-term incentive compensation-related

  32,152  40,538 

Seed capital

  109,328  123,920 

Consolidated private equity fund (10% seed capital)

  47,045  58,749 

Private equity (seed capital)

  47,853  35,726 

Other

  7,056  11,479 
      

Total investments

 $732,334 $795,294 
      

        Total investments related to long-term incentive compensation obligations of $123.0 million and $176.4 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, consist of company-sponsored mutual funds and hedge funds. We typically made investments in our services that were notionally elected by long-term incentive compensation plan participants and maintained them in a consolidated rabbi trust or separate custodial account. The rabbi trust and custodial account enable us to hold such investments separate from our other assets for the purpose of settling our obligations to participants. The investments held in the rabbi trust and custodial account remain available to the general creditors of AllianceBernstein.

        The underlying investments of hedge funds in which we invest include long and short positions in equity securities, fixed income securities (including various agency and non-agency asset-based securities), currencies, commodities and derivatives (including various swaps and forward contracts).


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

7. Investments (Continued)

These investments are valued at quoted market prices or, where quoted market prices are not available, are fair valued based on the pricing policies and procedures of the underlying funds.

        United States Treasury Bills are held by SCB LLC in its investment account, the majority of which are pledged as collateral with clearing organizations. These clearing organizations have the ability by contract or custom to sell or re-pledge this collateral.

        We provide seed capital to our investment teams to develop new products and services for our clients.

        Trading securities also include long positions in corporate equities and long exchange-traded options traded through our options desk.

        The following is a summary of the cost and fair value of available-for-sale and trading investments held as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

 
 Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair
Value
 
 
 (in thousands)
 

December 31, 2012:

             

Available-for-sale:

             

Equity investments

 $5,769 $1,445 $(149)$7,065 

Fixed income investments

  6,265  33  (2) 6,296 
          

 $12,034 $1,478 $(151)$13,361 
          

Trading:

             

Equity investments

 $239,368 $32,003 $(2,830)$268,541 

Fixed income investments

  199,191  12,098  (4,291) 206,998 
          

 $438,559 $44,101 $(7,121)$475,539 
          

December 31, 2011:

             

Available-for-sale:

             

Equity investments

 $6,753 $489 $(342)$6,900 

Fixed income investments

  6,857  133  (7) 6,983 
          

 $13,610 $622 $(349)$13,883 
          

Trading:

             

Equity investments

 $375,287 $5,959 $(41,938)$339,308 

Fixed income investments

  172,142  3,475  (3,926) 171,691 
          

 $547,429 $9,434 $(45,864)$510,999 
          

        Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investments were approximately $0.8 million, $3.5 million and $4.3 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Realized gains from our sales of available-for-sale investments were $0.1 million in 2012, $0.1 million in 2011 and $0.5 million in 2010. Realized losses from our sales of available-for-sale investments were $0.1 million in 2012, $0.1 million in 2011 and $0.4 million in 2010. We assess valuation declines to determine the extent to which such declines are


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

7. Investments (Continued)

fundamental to the underlying investment or attributable to temporary market-related factors. Based on our assessment, we do not believe the declines are other than temporary as of December 31, 2012.

8. Derivative Instruments

        We enter into various futures, forwards and swaps to economically hedge certain of our seed money investments. In addition, we have currency forwards that economically hedge certain cash accounts. We do not hold any derivatives designated in a formal hedge relationship under ASC 815-10,Derivatives and Hedging.

        The following table presents the notional value, fair value and gains and losses recognized in investment gains (losses) in the consolidated statements of income as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 for derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments:

 
 Notional
Value
 Derivative
Assets
 Derivative
Liabilities
 Gains
(Losses)
 
 
 (in thousands)
 

December 31, 2012:

             

Exchange-traded futures

 $89,901 $64 $1,598 $(18,291)

Currency forwards

  80,445  473  429  (503)

Interest rate swaps

  55,435  73  888  (1,358)

Credit default swaps

  53,775  457  272  (8,598)

Option swaps

  103  83  92  (424)

Total return swaps

  90,673  1,475  3,791  (6,470)
          

Total derivatives

 $370,332 $2,625 $7,070 $(35,644)
          

December 31, 2011:

             

Exchange-traded futures

 $111,447 $127 $2,054 $8,979 

Currency forwards

  38,330  358  227  453 

Interest rate swaps

  47,640  136  3,301  (5,585)

Credit default swaps

  84,215  2,962  639  676 

Total return swaps

  38,148  38  1,038  (184)
          

Total derivatives

 $319,780 $3,621 $7,259 $4,339 
          

        As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the derivative assets and liabilities are included in both receivables and payables to brokers and dealers on our consolidated statements of financial condition. Gains and losses on derivative instruments are reported in investments gains and losses on the consolidated statements of income.

        We may be exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivative financial instruments. We take steps to minimize our counterparty exposure through a credit review and approval process. In addition, we executed various collateral arrangements with counterparties to the over-the-counter derivative transactions that require both pledging and accepting collateral in the form of cash. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we held $1.5 million and $4.4 million, respectively, of cash collateral payable to trade counterparties. This obligation to return cash is reported in payables to brokers and dealers in our consolidated statements of financial condition.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

8. Derivative Instruments (Continued)

        Although notional amount is the most commonly used measure of volume in the derivative market, it is not used as a measure of credit risk. Generally, the current credit exposure of our derivative contracts is limited to the net positive estimated fair value of derivative contracts at the reporting date after taking into consideration the existence of netting agreements and any collateral received. A derivative with positive value (a derivative asset) indicates existence of credit risk because the counterparty would owe us if the contract were closed. Alternatively, a derivative contract with negative value (a derivative liability) indicates we would owe money to the counterparty if the contract were closed. Generally, if there is more than one derivative transaction with a single counterparty, a master netting arrangement exists with respect to derivative transactions with that counterparty to provide for aggregate net settlement.

        Certain of our standardized contracts for over-the-counter derivative transactions ("ISDA Master Agreements") contain credit risk related contingent provisions related to each counterparty's credit rating. In some ISDA Master Agreements, if the counterparty's credit rating (or in some agreements, our AUM) falls below a specified threshold, either a default or a termination event permitting the counterparty to terminate the ISDA Master Agreement would be triggered. In all agreements that provide for collateralization, various levels of collateralization of net liability positions are applicable, depending on the credit rating of the counterparty. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we delivered $8.4 million and $14.7 million, respectively, of cash collateral into brokerage accounts, which is reported in cash and cash equivalents in our consolidated statements of financial condition.

9. Fair Value

        Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the "exit price") in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The three broad levels of fair value hierarchy are as follows:


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

9. Fair Value (Continued)

        The following table summarizes the valuation of our financial instruments by pricing observability levels as of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

 
 December 31, 2012 
 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Money markets

 $170,120 $ $ $170,120 

U.S. Treasury bills

    1,537,150    1,537,150 

U.K. Treasury bills

    125    125 

Equity securities

             

Growth

  125,242      125,242 

Value

  36,126      36,126 

Multi-asset and asset allocation

  59,449      59,449 

Other(1)

  39,702      39,702 

Fixed Income securities

             

Taxable(2)

  177,635  1,219    178,854 

Tax-exempt(3)

  5,661  797    6,458 

Derivatives

  64  2,561    2,625 

Long exchange-traded options

  15,087      15,087 

Private equity

  7,695    76,953  84,648 
          

Total assets measured at fair value

 $636,781 $1,541,852 $76,953 $2,255,586 
          

Securities sold not yet purchased

             

Short equities-corporate

 $54,370 $ $ $54,370 

Short exchange-traded options

  9,197      9,197 

Other

  271      271 

Derivatives

  1,598  5,472    7,070 
          

Total liabilities measured at fair value

 $65,436 $5,472 $ $70,908 
          

Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

9. Fair Value (Continued)

 

 
 December 31, 2011 
 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Money markets

 $340,548 $ $ $340,548 

U.S. Treasury bills

    1,277,944    1,277,944 

U.K. Treasury bills

    119    119 

Equity securities

             

Growth

  107,802  189    107,991 

Value

  60,096  9    60,105 

Blend

  118,208      118,208 

Other(1)

  45,583      45,583 

Fixed Income securities

             

Taxable(2)

  110,062  14,488    124,550 

Tax-exempt(3)

  15,366  743    16,109 

Other

  17      17 

Derivatives

  127  3,494    3,621 

Long exchange-traded options

  14,322      14,322 

Private equity

  11,592    64,466  76,058 
          

Total assets measured at fair value

 $823,723 $1,296,986 $64,466 $2,185,175 
          

Securities sold not yet purchased

             

Short equities-corporate

 $34,469 $ $ $34,469 

Short exchange-traded options

  3,567      3,567 

Other

  1,271      1,271 

Derivatives

  2,054  5,205    7,259 
          

Total liabilities measured at fair value

 $41,361 $5,205 $ $46,566 
          

(1)
Primarily long positions in corporate equities traded through our options desk.

(2)
Primarily corporate and government securities.

(3)
Primarily municipal bonds.

        Following is a description of the fair value methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy:


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

9. Fair Value (Continued)


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

9. Fair Value (Continued)

        The following table summarizes the change in carrying value associated with Level 3 financial instruments carried at fair value:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Balance as of beginning of period

 $64,466 $59,414 

Transfers (out) in, net

  (13,548) (3,588)

Purchases

  19,660  10,002 

Sales

  (1,823) (214)

Realized gains (losses), net

  (7,524) (3,106)

Unrealized gains (losses), net

  15,722  1,958 
      

Balance as of end of period

 $76,953 $64,466 
      

        Transfers into and out of all levels of the fair value hierarchy are reflected at end-of-period fair values. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 financial instruments are recorded in investment gains and losses in the consolidated statements of income. A majority of the Level 3 investments are private equity investments owned by our consolidated venture capital fund, of which we own 10% and non-controlling interests own 90%.

        The following table provides quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements:

 
 Fair Value
as of
December 31,
2012
 Valuation
Technique
 Unobservable
Input
 Range 
 
 (in thousands)
  
  
  
 

Private Equity:

           

Technology, Media and Telecommunications

 $23,256 Market comparable companies Revenue multiple  2.5–6 

      Discount rate  18%

      Discount years  1–2 

Healthcare and Cleantech

 $14,871 Market comparable companies Revenue multiple(1)  0.6–62.5 

      R&D multiple(1)  1.0–30.6 

      Discount for lack of marketability and risk factors  40–60%

(1)
The median for the Healthcare and Cleantech revenue multiple is 10.1; the majority of the R&D multiples fall between 4.0 and 11.4.

Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

9. Fair Value (Continued)

        The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the reporting entities' venture capital securities in the technology, media and telecommunications areas are enterprise value to revenue multiples and a discount rate to account for the time until the securities are likely monetized and various risk factors. Significant increases (decreases) in the enterprise value to revenue multiple inputs in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. Significant increases (decreases) in the discount rate would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.

        The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the reporting entities' venture capital securities in the healthcare and cleantech areas are enterprise value to revenue multiples, enterprise value to R&D investment multiples, and a discount for lack of marketability and various risk factors. Significant increases (decreases) in the enterprise value to revenue multiple and enterprise value to R&D investment multiple inputs in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement. Significant increases (decreases) in the discount for lack of marketability and various risk factors in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the assumption used for the level of enterprise value to revenue multiple is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the enterprise value to R&D multiple. In addition, a change in the assumption used for the discount for lack of marketability and various risk factors is not correlated to changes in the assumptions used for the enterprise value to revenue multiple or the enterprise value to R&D investment multiple.

        We have one private equity investment, which is a venture capital fund (fair value of $29.9 million and unfunded commitment of $12.2 million as of December 31, 2012) investing in communications, consumer, digital media, healthcare and information technology markets. We also have a second private equity investment which is an investment in a private equity fund focused exclusively on the energy sector (fair value of $7.7 million and unfunded commitment of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2012). In addition, one of the investments included in our consolidated private equity fund (fair value of $1.2 million and unfunded commitment of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2012) is a venture capital fund investing in clean energy, resource and energy efficiency and other sustainable industries. The fair value of each of these investments has been estimated using the capital account balances provided by the partnerships. The interests in these partnerships cannot be redeemed.

        There were no impairments recognized for goodwill, intangible assets or other long-lived assets as of December 31, 2012.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

10. Furniture, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements, Net

        Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net consist of:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Furniture and equipment

 $525,292 $564,958 

Leasehold improvements

  273,433  348,987 
      

  798,725  913,945 

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization

  (602,600) (640,841)
      

Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net

 $196,125 $273,104 
      

        Depreciation and amortization expense on furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements were $52.8 million, $60.9 million and $59.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

        During 2012, 2011 and 2010, we recorded $223.0 million, $7.2 million and $101.7 million, respectively, in pre-tax real estate charges. Included in these charges were $41.4 million, $4.6 million and $25.5 million, respectively, worth of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment we wrote off related to the respective spaces.See Note 3 for further discussion of the real estate charges.

11. Deferred Sales Commissions, Net

        The components of deferred sales commissions, net for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows (excluding amounts related to fully amortized deferred sales commissions):

 
 December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Carrying amount of deferred sales commissions

 $758,127 $660,735 

Less: Accumulated amortization

  (475,032) (434,770)

Cumulative CDSC received

  (187,665) (165,966)
      

Deferred sales commissions, net

 $95,430 $59,999 
      

        Amortization expense was $40.3 million, $37.7 million and $47.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense related to the December 31, 2012 net asset balance, assuming no additional CDSC is received in future periods, is as follows (in thousands):

2013

    $39,560 

2014

     25,760 

2015

     20,179 

2016

     9,312 

2017

     541 

2018

     78 
       

    $95,430 
       

Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

12. Debt

        As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, AllianceBernstein had $323.2 million and $444.9 million, respectively, in commercial paper outstanding with weighted average interest rates of approximately 0.5% and 0.2%, respectively. The commercial paper is short term in nature, and as such, recorded value is estimated to approximate fair value. Average daily borrowings of commercial paper during 2012 and 2011 were $404.9 million and $273.6 million, respectively, with weighted average interest rates of approximately 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively.

        AllianceBernstein has a $1.0 billion committed, unsecured senior revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility") with a group of commercial banks and other lenders which matures on January 17, 2017. The Credit Facility provides for possible increases in the principal amount by up to an aggregate incremental amount of $250 million, any such increase being subject to the consent of the affected lenders. The Credit Facility is available for AllianceBernstein's and SCB LLC's business purposes, including the support of AllianceBernstein's $1.0 billion commercial paper program. Both AllianceBernstein and SCB LLC can draw directly under the Credit Facility and management expects to draw on the Credit Facility from time to time. AllianceBernstein has agreed to guarantee the obligations of SCB LLC under the Credit Facility.

        The Credit Facility contains affirmative, negative and financial covenants, which are customary for facilities of this type, including, among other things, restrictions on dispositions of assets, restrictions on liens, a minimum interest coverage ratio and a maximum leverage ratio. We are in compliance with these covenants. The Credit Facility also includes customary events of default (with customary grace periods, as applicable), including provisions under which, upon the occurrence of an event of default, all outstanding loans may be accelerated and/or lender's commitments may be terminated. Also, under such provisions, upon the occurrence of certain insolvency- or bankruptcy-related events of default, all amounts payable under the Credit Facility would automatically become immediately due and payable, and the lender's commitments would automatically terminate.

        Amounts under the Credit Facility may be borrowed, repaid and re-borrowed by us from time to time until the maturity of the facility. Voluntary prepayments and commitment reductions requested by us are permitted at any time without fee (other than customary breakage costs relating to the prepayment of any drawn loans) upon proper notice and subject to a minimum dollar requirement. Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum, which will be, at our option, a rate equal to an applicable margin, which is subject to adjustment based on the credit ratings of AllianceBernstein, plus one of the following indexes: London Interbank Offered Rate; a floating base rate; or the Federal Funds rate.

        As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had no amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility. During 2012, we did not draw upon the Credit Facility. During 2011, $40.0 million was outstanding for one day in February (with an interest rate of 1.3%) resulting in average daily borrowings of $0.1 million under the Credit Facility.

        In addition, SCB LLC has five uncommitted lines of credit with four financial institutions. Two of these lines of credit permit us to borrow up to an aggregate of approximately $200.0 million while three lines have no stated limit.

        As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had no uncommitted bank loans outstanding. Average daily borrowings of uncommitted bank loans during 2012 and 2011 were $18.1 million and $6.4 million, respectively, with weighted average interest rates of approximately 1.3% for both years. In May 2012,


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

12. Debt (Continued)

AllianceBernstein was named an additional borrower under a $100.0 million SCB uncommitted line of credit. As of December 31, 2012, AllianceBernstein had no loans outstanding. During 2012, $5.0 million was outstanding for one day with an interest rate of 1.4%. In January 2013, AllianceBernstein was named an additional borrower on a second $100.0 million SCB uncommitted line of credit.

13. Commitments and Contingencies

        We lease office space, furniture and office equipment under various operating leases. The future minimum payments under non-cancelable leases, sublease commitments and related payments we are obligated to make, net of sublease commitments of third party lessees to make payments to us, as of December 31, 2012 are as follows:

 
 Payments Sublease
Receipts
 Net
Payments
 
 
 (in millions)
  
  
 

2013

 $139.4 $22.3 $117.1 

2014

  136.0  24.4  111.6 

2015

  136.2  24.4  111.8 

2016

  135.6  24.4  111.2 

2017

  136.9  24.8  112.1 

2018 and thereafter

  1,084.4  137.1  947.3 
        

Total future minimum payments

 $1,768.5 $257.4 $1,511.1 
        

        Office leases contain escalation clauses that provide for the pass through of increases in operating expenses and real estate taxes. Rent expense, which is amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease, was $100.4 million, $121.2 million and $121.5 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, net of sublease income of $3.2 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. In addition, we accelerated rent of $181.6 million, $2.6 million and $76.2 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.See Note 3 for further discussion of the real estate charges.

        During the first quarter of 2012, we received a legal letter of claim (the "Letter of Claim") sent on behalf of a former European pension fund client, alleging that AllianceBernstein Limited (a wholly owned subsidiary of ours organized in the U.K.) was negligent and failed to meet certain applicable standards of care with respect to the initial investment in and management of a £500 million portfolio of U.S. mortgage-backed securities. The alleged damages range between $177 million and $234 million, plus compound interest on an alleged $125 million of realized losses in the portfolio. We believe that any losses to this client resulted from adverse developments in the U.S. housing and mortgage market that precipitated the financial crisis in 2008 and not any negligence or failure on our part. We believe that we have strong defenses to these claims, which are set forth in our October 12, 2012 response to the Letter of Claim, and will defend this matter vigorously. Currently, we are unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss because the matter remains in its early stages.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

13. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

        In addition to the Letter of Claim, we are involved in various other matters, including regulatory inquiries, administrative proceedings and litigation, some of which allege significant damages.

        In management's opinion, an adequate accrual has been made as of December 31, 2012 to provide for any probable losses regarding any litigation matters for which we can reasonably estimate an amount of loss. It is reasonably possible that we could incur additional losses pertaining to these matters, but currently we cannot estimate any such additional losses.

        Management, after consultation with legal counsel, currently believes that the outcome of any matter that is pending or threatened, or all of them combined, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. However, as any inquiry, proceeding or litigation has an element of uncertainty, management cannot determine whether further developments relating to any matter that is pending or threatened, or all of them combined, will have a material adverse effect on our results of operation, financial condition or liquidity in any future reporting period.

        During 2009, we entered into a subscription agreement under which we committed to invest up to $35 million, as amended in 2011, in a venture capital fund over a six-year period. As of December 31, 2012, we had funded $22.8 million of this commitment.

        During 2010, as general partner of the AllianceBernstein U.S. Real Estate L.P. (the "Real Estate Fund"), we committed to invest $25 million in the Real Estate Fund. As of December 31, 2012, we had funded $8.7 million of this commitment.

        During 2012, we entered into an investment agreement under which we committed to invest up to $8 million in an oil and gas fund over a three-year period. As of December 31, 2012, we had funded $7.8 million of this commitment.

14. Net Capital

        SCB LLC, a broker-dealer and a member organization of the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE"), is subject to the Uniform Net Capital Rule 15c3-1 of the Exchange Act. SCB LLC computes its net capital under the alternative method permitted by the rule, which requires that minimum net capital, as defined, equal the greater of $1 million, or two percent of aggregate debit items arising from customer transactions, as defined. As of December 31, 2012, SCB LLC had net capital of $144.4 million, which was $125.9 million in excess of the minimum net capital requirement of $18.5 million. Advances, dividend payments and other equity withdrawals by SCB LLC are restricted by the regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., and other securities agencies.

        SCBL is a member of the London Stock Exchange. As of December 31, 2012, SCBL was subject to financial resources requirements of $21.6 million imposed by the Financial Services Authority of the United Kingdom and had aggregate regulatory financial resources of $39.0 million, an excess of $17.4 million.

        AllianceBernstein Investments serves as distributor and/or underwriter for certain company-sponsored mutual funds. AllianceBernstein Investments is registered as a broker-dealer under the


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

14. Net Capital (Continued)

Exchange Act and is subject to the minimum net capital requirements imposed by the SEC. AllianceBernstein Investments' net capital as of December 31, 2012 was $31.0 million, which was $30.9 million in excess of its required net capital of $0.1 million.

        Many of our subsidiaries around the world are subject to minimum net capital requirements by the local laws and regulations to which they are subject. As of December 31, 2012, each of our subsidiaries subject to a minimum net capital requirement satisfied the applicable requirement.

15. Counterparty Risk

        In the normal course of business, brokerage activities involve the execution, settlement and financing of various customer securities trades, which may expose SCB LLC and SCBL to off-balance sheet risk by requiring SCB LLC and SCBL to purchase or sell securities at prevailing market prices in the event the customer is unable to fulfill its contractual obligations.

        SCB LLC's customer securities activities are transacted on either a cash or margin basis. In margin transactions, SCB LLC extends credit to the customer, subject to various regulatory and internal margin requirements. These transactions are collateralized by cash or securities in the customer's account. In connection with these activities, SCB LLC may execute and clear customer transactions involving the sale of securities not yet purchased. SCB LLC seeks to control the risks associated with margin transactions by requiring customers to maintain collateral in compliance with the aforementioned regulatory and internal guidelines. SCB LLC monitors required margin levels daily and, pursuant to such guidelines, requires customers to deposit additional collateral, or reduce positions, when necessary. A majority of SCB LLC's customer margin accounts are managed on a discretionary basis whereby AllianceBernstein maintains control over the investment activity in the accounts. For these discretionary accounts, SCB LLC's margin deficiency exposure is minimized through maintaining a diversified portfolio of securities in the accounts and by virtue of AllianceBernstein's discretionary authority and SCB LLC's role as custodian.

        SCB LLC may enter into forward foreign currency contracts on behalf of accounts for which SCB LLC acts as custodian. SCB LLC minimizes credit risk associated with these contracts by monitoring these positions on a daily basis, as well as by virtue of AllianceBernstein's discretionary authority and SCB LLC's role as custodian.

        In accordance with industry practice, SCB LLC and SCBL record customer transactions on a settlement date basis, which is generally three business days after trade date. SCB LLC and SCBL are exposed to risk of loss on these transactions in the event of the customer's or broker's inability to meet the terms of their contracts, in which case SCB LLC and SCBL may have to purchase or sell financial instruments at prevailing market prices. The risks assumed by SCB LLC and SCBL in connection with these transactions are not expected to have a material adverse effect on AllianceBernstein's, SCB LLC's, or SCBL's financial condition or results of operations.

        SCB LLC and SCBL are engaged in various brokerage activities on behalf of clients, including Sanford C. Bernstein (Hong Kong) Limited (an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein), in which counterparties primarily include broker-dealers, banks and other financial institutions. In the


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

15. Counterparty Risk (Continued)

event counterparties do not fulfill their obligations, SCB LLC and SCBL may be exposed to risk. The risk of default depends on the creditworthiness of the counterparty or issuer of the instrument. It is SCB LLC's and SCBL's policy to review, as necessary, each counterparty's creditworthiness.

        In connection with security borrowing and lending arrangements, SCB LLC and SCBL enter into collateralized agreements, which may result in credit exposure in the event the counterparty to a transaction is unable to fulfill its contractual obligations. Security borrowing arrangements require SCB LLC and SCBL to deposit cash collateral with the lender. With respect to security lending arrangements, SCB LLC (SCBL does not participate in security lending arrangements) receives collateral in the form of cash in amounts generally in excess of the market value of the securities loaned. SCB LLC minimizes credit risk associated with these activities by establishing credit limits for each broker and monitoring these limits on a daily basis. Additionally, security borrowing and lending collateral is marked to market on a daily basis, and additional collateral is deposited by or returned to SCB LLC and SCBL as necessary.

        AllianceBernstein enters into various futures, forwards and swaps to economically hedge certain of its seed money investments, as well as currency forwards to hedge certain cash accounts. AllianceBernstein is exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these derivative financial instruments.See Note 8 for further discussion.

16. Qualified Employee Benefit Plans

        We maintain a qualified profit sharing plan covering U.S. employees and certain foreign employees. Employer contributions are discretionary and generally limited to the maximum amount deductible for federal income tax purposes. Aggregate contributions for 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $13.0 million, $13.7 million and $14.6 million, respectively.

        We maintain several defined contribution plans for foreign employees working for our subsidiaries in the United Kingdom, Australia, Japan and other foreign locations outside the United States. Employer contributions are generally consistent with regulatory requirements and tax limits. Defined contribution expense for foreign entities was $6.7 million, $7.7 million and $7.1 million in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

        We maintain a qualified, noncontributory, defined benefit retirement plan ("Retirement Plan") covering current and former employees who were employed by AllianceBernstein in the United States prior to October 2, 2000. Benefits are based on years of credited service, average final base salary (as defined in the Retirement Plan), and primary Social Security benefits. Service and compensation after December 31, 2008 are not taken into account in determining participants' retirement benefits.

        Our policy is to satisfy our funding obligation for each year in an amount not less than the minimum required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and not greater than the maximum amount we can deduct for federal income tax purposes. We contributed $4.9 million to the Retirement Plan during 2012. We currently estimate that we will contribute $4.0 million to the Retirement Plan during 2013. Contribution estimates, which are subject to change, are based on regulatory requirements, future market conditions and assumptions used for actuarial computations of the Retirement Plan's obligations and assets. Management, at the present time, has not determined the amount, if any, of additional future contributions that may be required.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

16. Qualified Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)

        The Retirement Plan's projected benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets, and funded status (amounts recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition) were as follows:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Change in projected benefit obligation:

       

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year

 $94,655 $87,733 

Interest cost

  4,633  4,627 

Actuarial loss

  13,481  4,585 

Benefits paid

  (4,963) (2,290)
      

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

  107,806  94,655 
      

Change in plan assets:

       

Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year

  63,325  64,627 

Actual return on plan assets

  8,408  (5,912)

Employer contribution

  4,850  6,900 

Benefits paid

  (4,963) (2,290)
      

Plan assets at fair value at end of year

  71,620  63,325 
      

Funded status

 $(36,186)$(31,330)
      

        The amounts recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) for 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

 
 2012 2011 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Unrecognized net loss from experience different from that assumed and effects of changes and assumptions

 $(9,194)$(15,231)

Unrecognized net plan assets as of January 1, 1987 being recognized over 26.3 years

  (143) (143)

  (9,337) (15,374)

Income tax (expense) benefit

  (126) 332 
      

Other comprehensive loss

 $(9,463)$(15,042)
      

Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

16. Qualified Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)

        The amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

 
 2012 2011 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Unrecognized net loss from experience different from that assumed and effects of changes and assumptions

 $(48,264)$(39,070)

Unrecognized net plan assets as of January 1, 1987 being recognized over 26.3 years

  47  190 
      

  (48,217) (38,880)

Income tax benefit

  723  849 
      

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 $(47,494)$(38,031)
      

        The estimated initial plan assets and amortization of loss for the Retirement Plan that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income over the next year is $47,129 and $1,105,698, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for the plan was $107.8 million and $94.7 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.

        The discount rates used to determine benefit obligations as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 (measurement dates) were 4.4% and 5.1%, respectively.

        The following benefit payments are expected to be paid as follows (in thousands):

2013

 $3,331 

2014

  3,019 

2015

  4,822 

2016

  5,763 

2017

  4,889 

2018 - 2022

  30,153 
    

        Net expense under the Retirement Plan consisted of:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Interest cost on projected benefit obligations

 $4,633 $4,627 $4,600 

Expected return on plan assets

  (4,969) (5,133) (4,453)

Amortization of transition asset

  (143) (143) (143)

Recognized actuarial loss

  848  399  262 
        

Net pension expense (benefit)

 $369 $(250)$266 
        

Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

16. Qualified Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)

        Actuarial computations used to determine net periodic costs were made utilizing the following weighted-average assumptions:

 
 Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Discount rate on benefit obligations

  5.10% 5.50% 6.05%

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets

  8.00  8.00  8.00 

        The Retirement Plan's asset allocation percentages consisted of:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 

Equity securities

  67% 62%

Debt securities

  28  28 

Real estate

  2  10 

Cash

  3   
      

  100% 100%
      

        In developing the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8.0%, management considered the historical returns and future expectations for returns for each asset category, as well as the target asset allocation of the portfolio. The expected long-term rate of return on assets is based on weighted average expected returns for each asset class.

        The guidelines regarding allocation of assets formalized in the Investment Policy Statement were adopted by the Investment Committee for the Retirement Plan to reflect the Plan's liquidity requirements, funded status, growth expectations and risk tolerance. The guidelines specify an allocation weighting of 50% to 70% for global equity securities (target of 60%), 20% to 40% for fixed income securities (target of 30%) and 0% to 10% for real estate investment trusts (target of 10%). Alternative investments are permitted under the guidelines, with such investments to be allocated to one or more of the above security classes and subject to the indicated tactical ranges.

        Exposure of the total portfolio to cash equivalents on average should not exceed 5% of the portfolio's value on a market value basis. The plan seeks to provide a rate of return that exceeds applicable benchmarks over rolling five-year periods. The benchmark for the plan's large cap domestic equity investment strategy is the S&P 500 Index; the small cap domestic equity investment strategy is measured against the Russell 2000 Index; the international equity investment strategy is measured against the MSCI EAFE Index; and the fixed income investment strategy is measured against the Barclays Aggregate Bond Index.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

16. Qualified Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)

        SeeNote 9 for a description of how we measure the fair value of our plan assets. The following table summarizes the valuation of our Retirement Plan assets by pricing observability levels as of December 31, 2012:

 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Cash

 $2,197 $ $ $2,197 

Fixed income mutual funds

  22,135      22,135 

Equity mutual fund

  12,356      12,356 

Equity securities

  23,933      23,933 

Equity private investment trusts

    10,999    10,999 
          

Total assets measured at fair value

 $60,621 $10,999 $ $71,620 
          

        During 2012, the Retirement Plan invested in two fixed income mutual funds. Both funds seek to generate income consistent with preservation of capital. One mutual fund invests in a portfolio of fixed income securities of U.S. and non-U.S. companies and U.S. and non-U.S. government securities and supranational entities, including lower-rated securities. The second fund invests in a broad range of fixed income securities in both developed and emerging markets with a range of maturities from short-to long-duration.

        The Retirement Plan also invested in separate equity and fixed income mutual funds which seek to moderate the volatility of equity and fixed income oriented asset allocation over the long term, as part of an investor's overall asset allocation managed by AllianceBernstein.

        The Retirement Plan invested in a multi-style, multi-cap integrated portfolio adding incremental U.S. equity diversification to its value and growth equity selections, designed to deliver a long-term premium to the S&P 500 with greater consistency across a range of market environments.

        Finally, the Retirement Plan invested in two equity private investment trusts. One trust invests primarily in equity securities of non-U.S. companies located in emerging market countries, while the other trust invests in equity securities of established non-U.S. companies located in the countries comprising the MSCI EAFE Index, plus Canada.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

16. Qualified Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)

        The following table summarizes the valuation of our Retirement Plan assets by pricing observability levels as of December 31, 2011:

 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Cash

 $9 $ $ $9 

Government securities

             

U.S. Treasury bills

    662    662 

Agency Discount notes

    208    208 

Real estate mutual fund

  6,358      6,358 

Fixed income mutual funds

  16,591      16,591 

Equity mutual funds

  10,938      10,938 

Equity private investment trusts

    28,559    28,559 
          

Total assets measured at fair value

 $33,896 $29,429 $ $63,325 
          

        During 2011, the Retirement Plan invested in a real estate mutual fund which is an open-end fund that seeks total return from long-term growth of capital and income. Typically the mutual fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in real estate investment trusts and other real estate industry companies. The mutual fund is subject to certain risks associated with the direct ownership of real estate and with the real estate industry in general. To the extent that assets underlying the mutual fund's investments are concentrated geographically, by property type or in certain other respects, the mutual fund may be subject to additional risks.

        The Retirement Plan also invested in two fixed income mutual funds. One of the mutual funds seeks to provide safety of principal and a moderate rate of income that is subject to taxes. Typically the mutual funds invest at least 80% of their net assets in securities rated A or better by national rating agencies. The other fixed income mutual fund seeks to generate current income consistent with preservation of capital. The mutual fund invests in debt securities with a range of maturities from short- to long-duration in both developed and emerging markets.

        The Retirement Plan invested in two equity mutual funds. One equity mutual fund seeks long-term growth of capital through the pursuit of opportunistic growth by investing in a global universe of companies in multiple industries that may benefit from innovation. The second mutual fund's objective is to maximize real return, which equals total return less the estimated effect of inflation. The mutual fund invests principally in instruments that are affected directly or indirectly by the level and change in rate of inflation.

        Finally the Retirement Plan invested in two equity private investment trusts. One of these trusts invests primarily in equity securities of companies located around the world, while the other invests primarily in equity securities of non-U.S. companies located in emerging market countries.

        The government securities held by the Retirement Plan consist of United States Treasury Bills and Agency Discount notes.

        We provide postretirement medical benefits which allow retirees between the ages of 55 and 65 meeting certain service requirements, at their election, to continue to participate in our group medical program by paying 100% of the applicable group premium. Retirees older than 65 may also continue to


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

16. Qualified Employee Benefit Plans (Continued)

participate in our group medical program, but are required to pay the full expected cost of benefits. To the extent that retirees' medical costs exceed premiums paid, we incur the cost of providing a post-retirement medical benefit. During 2012, our net periodic benefit cost was $0.8 million, and our aggregate benefit obligation as of December 31, 2012 was $7.5 million.

17. Long-term Incentive Compensation Plans

        We maintain an unfunded, non-qualified incentive compensation program known as the AllianceBernstein 2012 Incentive Compensation Award Program (the "Incentive Compensation Program"), under which annual awards may be granted to eligible employees. SeeNote 2. "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Long-term Incentive Compensation Plans" for a discussion of the award provisions.

        Under the Incentive Compensation Program, we made awards in 2012, 2011 and 2010 aggregating $150.1 million, $159.9 million and $275.6 million, respectively. The amounts charged to employee compensation and benefits for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $151.4 million, $654.3 million (which includes $509.1 million of the one-time, non-cash compensation charge) and $207.9 million, respectively.

        During 2005, we established the AllianceBernstein Financial Advisor Wealth Accumulation Plan ("Wealth Accumulation Plan"), a voluntary unfunded, non-qualified incentive plan. The Wealth Accumulation Plan was established to attract, motivate and retain eligible employees expected to make significant contributions to the future growth and success of Bernstein Global Wealth Management, the unit of AllianceBernstein that services private clients. Participants designate the percentage of their awards to be notionally invested in Holding Units or certain of our investment services. No more than 50% of the award may be notionally invested in Holding Units. Prior to the changes made to incentive compensation awards in the fourth quarter of 2011 (seeNote 2, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Long-term Incentive Compensation Plans"), all awards vested annually on a pro rata basis over the term of the award. There have been no awards granted under this plan since 2009. The amounts charged to employee compensation and benefits expense for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $(0.5) million, $25.5 million (which includes $24.8 million of the one-time, non-cash compensation charge) and $8.5 million, respectively.

18. Compensatory Unit Awards and Option Plans

        Effective as of July 1, 2010, we established the AllianceBernstein 2010 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended ("2010 Plan"), which was adopted by Holding Unitholders at a special meeting of Holding Unitholders held on June 30, 2010. Since the 2010 Plan was adopted, the following forms of awards have been available for grant to employees and Eligible Directors: (i) restricted Holding Units or phantom restricted Holding Units (a "phantom" award is a contractual right to receive Holding Units at a later date or upon a specified event); (ii) options to buy Holding Units; and (iii) other Holding Unit-based awards (including, without limitation, Holding Unit appreciation rights and performance awards). The purpose of the 2010 Plan is to promote the interest of AllianceBernstein by: (i) attracting and retaining talented officers, employees and directors, (ii) motivating such officers, employees and directors by means of performance-related incentives to achieve longer-range business and operational goals, (iii) enabling such officers, employees and directors to participate in the long-term growth and financial success of AllianceBernstein, and (iv) aligning the interests of such officers, employees and


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

18. Compensatory Unit Awards and Option Plans (Continued)

directors with those of Holding Unitholders. The 2010 Plan will expire on June 30, 2020, and no awards under the 2010 Plan will be made after that date. Under the 2010 Plan, the aggregate number of Holding Units with respect to which awards may be granted is 60.0 million, including no more than 30.0 million newly issued Holding Units.

        The 2010 Plan was amended by the Board in May 2011, expanding the universe of persons eligible to receive awards under the 2010 Plan to include any member of the Board who is a former executive or former employee of an affiliate of Holding. For purposes of this amendment, "affiliate" includes any company or other entity that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with, AllianceBernstein.

        The 2010 Plan was further amended by the Compensation Committee of the Board ("Compensation Committee") in December 2011, clarifying that, where duly authorized by the Compensation Committee or the Board, continued vesting of Awards after a Termination (as those terms are defined in the 2010 Plan or the applicable award agreement) in circumstances where such continued vesting is conditioned on compliance with (A) one or more restrictive covenants, and/or (B) a standard of conduct regarding appropriate consideration of risk set forth in the applicable award agreement, shall count towards satisfying the minimum vesting requirement set forth in Section 6(b)(i) of the 2010 Plan.

        The 2010 Plan was further amended by the Board in May 2012, when the Board authorized management to reacquire on the open market or otherwise all 60.0 million Holding Units available for awards under the 2010 Plan (less one Holding Unit for every newly issued Holding Unit already awarded under the 2010 Plan), while maintaining the 30.0 million Holding Unit limitation on newly issued Holding Units available for awards under the 2010 Plan.

        As of December 31, 2012, 210,591 options to buy Holding Units had been granted and 24,563,327 Holding Units, net of forfeitures, were subject to other Holding Unit awards made under the 2010 Plan. Holding Unit-based awards (including options) in respect of 35,226,082 Holding Units were available for grant as of December 31, 2012.

        In 1997, we established the 1997 Long Term Incentive Plan ("1997 Plan"), under which options to buy Holding Units, restricted Holding Units and phantom restricted Holding Units, performance awards, and other Holding Unit-based awards were available for grant to key employees and Eligible Directors of the General Partner for terms established at the time of grant (generally 10 years). Options granted to employees are generally exercisable at a rate of 20% of the Holding Units subject to such options on each of the first five anniversary dates of the date of grant; options granted to Eligible Directors are generally exercisable at a rate of 33.3% of the Holding Units subject to such options on each of the first three anniversary dates of the date of grant. Restricted Holding Units awarded to Eligible Directors vest on the third anniversary of the grant date or immediately upon a director's resignation. Restricted Holding Units awarded to our CEO (as described below under "Restricted Holding Unit Awards") vest 20% on each of the first five anniversary dates of the grant date. Restricted Holding Units awarded under the Incentive Compensation Program vest 25% on December 1st of the subsequent four years. The 1997 Plan expired on July 26, 2010.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

18. Compensatory Unit Awards and Option Plans (Continued)

        Options to buy Holding Units (including grants to Eligible Directors) were granted as follows: 114,443 options were granted during 2012, 70,238 options were granted during 2011 and 387,661 options were granted during 2010. The weighted average fair value of options to buy Holding Units granted during 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $3.67, $5.98 and $6.18, respectively, on the date of grant, determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following assumptions:

 
 2012 2011 2010

Risk-free interest rate

 0.7% 1.9% 2.2–2.3%

Expected cash distribution yield

 6.2 5.4 7.2–8.2%

Historical volatility factor

 49.2 47.3 46.2–46.6%

Expected term

 6.0 years 6.0 years 6.0 years

        Due to a lack of sufficient historical data, we have chosen to use the simplified method to calculate the expected term of options.

        The following table summarizes the activity in our option plan during 2012:

 
 Options to
Buy Holding
Units
 Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price Per
Option
 Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
 Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2011

 $8,994,229 $39.63 $6.4    

Granted

  114,443  14.58       

Exercised

           

Forfeited

  (11,500) 33.18       

Expired

  (543,827) 32.34       
             

Outstanding as of December 31, 2012

  8,553,345  39.77  5.8 $ 
             

Exercisable as of December 31, 2012

  4,237,915  33.85  5.7   
             

Vested or expected to vest as of December 31, 2012

  8,553,345  39.77  5.8   
             

        The aggregate intrinsic value as of December 31, 2012 on options outstanding, exercisable and expected to vest is negative, and is therefore presented as zero in the table above. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during 2012, 2011 and 2010 was zero, $0.4 million and $5.6 million, respectively.

        Under the fair value method, compensation expense is measured at the grant date based on the estimated fair value of the options awarded (determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model) and is recognized over the required service period. We recorded compensation expense relating to option grants of $1.2 million, $36.4 million (which includes $35.2 million of the one-time, non-cash compensation charge) and $9.1 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010. As of December 31, 2012, there was $0.2 million of compensation cost related to unvested option grants not yet recognized in the consolidated statement of income. The remaining cost is expected to be recognized during the first half of 2013.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

18. Compensatory Unit Awards and Option Plans (Continued)

        In 2012, 2011 and 2010, restricted Holding Units were awarded to Eligible Directors. These Holding Units give the Eligible Directors, in most instances, all the rights of other Holding Unitholders subject to such restrictions on transfer as the Board may impose. We awarded 28,812, 19,313 and 5,275 restricted Holding Units, respectively, in 2012, 2011 and 2010 with grant date fair values of $14.58, $21.75 and $28.46, respectively, per restricted Holding Unit. All of the restricted Holding Units vest on the third anniversary of grant date or immediately upon a director's resignation. We fully expensed these awards on each grant date. We recorded compensation expense relating to these awards of $0.4 million, $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

        In connection with the commencement of Mr. Kraus's employment as our CEO on December 19, 2008, he was granted 2,722,052 restricted Holding Units with a grant date fair value of $19.20. Subject to accelerated vesting provisions in Mr. Kraus's employment agreement, his restricted Holding Units vest ratably on each of the first five anniversaries of December 19, 2008, commencing December 19, 2009, provided, with respect to each installment, Mr. Kraus continues to be employed by AllianceBernstein on the vesting date. Mr. Kraus's service requirement was not impacted by the changes to the employee long-term incentive compensation award program in the fourth quarter of 2011. During June 2012, Mr. Kraus entered into an agreement (the "Extended Employment Agreement") pursuant to which Mr. Kraus will continue to serve as our CEO from January 3, 2014, the day following the end of the term of his initial employment agreement, until January 2, 2019 (the "Extended Employment Term"), unless the Extended Employment Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms. In connection with the signing of the Extended Employment Agreement, Mr. Kraus was granted 2,722,052 restricted Holding Units, vesting ratably over the Extended Employment Term. Under U.S. GAAP, the compensation expense for the Holding Unit award under the Extended Employment Agreement of $33.1 million (based on the $12.17 grant date Holding Unit price) must be amortized on a straight-line basis over 6.5 years, beginning on the grant date. As a result, even though Mr. Kraus will not receive any incremental cash compensation or cash distributions related to the restricted Holding Unit award pursuant to the Extended Employment Agreement prior to its commencement on January 3, 2014, we incurred $2.5 million of incremental compensation expense during the second half of 2012 and will incur $5.1 million of such expense for the full year 2013. We recorded compensation expense relating to the CEO restricted Holding Unit grants of $13.0 million, $10.5 million and $10.5 million, respectively, for each of the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

        In 1993, we established the Century Club Plan, under which employees of AllianceBernstein whose primary responsibilities are to assist in the distribution of company-sponsored mutual funds and who meet certain sales targets, are eligible to receive an award of restricted Holding Units. Awards granted prior to December 2010 vested ratably over three years and subsequent awards vest ratably over four years. The service requirement for Century Club participants was impacted by the amendment to the employee long-term incentive compensation award program in the fourth quarter of 2011. We awarded 47,450, 57,828 and 95,531 restricted Holding Units in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The grant date fair values of these awards were $17.91 in 2012, $13.38 in 2011 and $27.45 and $23.72 in 2010 per Holding Unit. We recorded compensation expense relating to the Century Club Plan grants of $0.7 million, $3.0 million (which includes $2.2 million of the one-time, non-cash compensation charge) and $1.2 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

18. Compensatory Unit Awards and Option Plans (Continued)

        Beginning in 2009, we awarded restricted Holding Units under the Incentive Compensation Program (seeNote 17). We awarded 8,671,253 (all of which were granted in January 2012 for 2011 year-end awards) in 2012 and 11,594,207 restricted Holding Units in 2010 with grant date fair values of $14.90 in 2012 and ranging between $23.72 and $32.06 in 2010 per restricted Holding Unit.

        We also award restricted Holding Units in connection with certain employment and separation agreements with vesting schedules ranging between two to five years. The fair value of the restricted Holding Units is amortized over the required service period as employee compensation expense. We awarded 630,630, 1,649,973 and 1,369,751 Holding Units in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, with grant date fair values ranging between $12.13 and $17.58 in 2012, $16.29 and $22.71 in 2011 and $23.72 and $28.37 in 2010 per restricted Holding Unit. We recorded compensation expense relating to restricted Holding Unit grants in connection with certain employment and separation agreements of $20.1 million, $32.9 million (which includes $15.8 million of the one-time, non-cash compensation charge) and $23.2 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

        The following table summarizes the activity of unvested restricted Holding Units during 2012:

 
 Holding Units Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
per Holding
Unit
 

Unvested as of December 31, 2011

  15,574,191 $23.88 

Granted

  12,099,291  14.48 

Vested

  (8,507,437) 21.65 

Forfeited

  (728,556) 20.67 
       

Unvested as of December 31, 2012

  18,437,489  18.79 
       

        The total grant date fair value of restricted Holding Units that vested during 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $184.2 million, $140.2 million and $73.4 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2012, there was $59.3 million of compensation cost related to unvested restricted Holding Unit awards granted and not yet recognized in the consolidated statement of income. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 4.0 years.

19. Units Outstanding

        Changes in units outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

 
 2012 2011 

Outstanding as of January 1,

  277,847,588  278,115,232 

Options exercised

    86,543 

Units issued

     

Units retired

  (246,687) (354,187)

Units forfeited

     
      

Outstanding as of December 31,

  277,600,901  277,847,588 
      

Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

19. Units Outstanding (Continued)

        During 2012 and 2011, we purchased 246,687 and 354,187 AllianceBernstein Units, respectively, in private transactions and retired them.

20. Income Taxes

        AllianceBernstein is a private partnership for federal income tax purposes and, accordingly, is not subject to federal or state corporate income taxes. However, AllianceBernstein is subject to a 4.0% New York City unincorporated business tax ("UBT"). Domestic corporate subsidiaries of AllianceBernstein, which are subject to federal, state and local income taxes, are generally included in the filing of a consolidated federal income tax return with separate state and local income tax returns being filed. Foreign corporate subsidiaries are generally subject to taxes in the foreign jurisdictions where they are located.

        In order to preserve AllianceBernstein's status as a private partnership for federal income tax purposes, AllianceBernstein Units must not be considered publicly traded. The AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement provides that all transfers of AllianceBernstein Units must be approved by AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of AXA, "AXA Equitable") and the General Partner; AXA Equitable and the General Partner approve only those transfers permitted pursuant to one or more of the safe harbors contained in relevant treasury regulations. If AllianceBernstein Units were considered readily tradable, AllianceBernstein's net income would be subject to federal and state corporate income tax, reducing its quarterly distribution to Holding. Furthermore, should AllianceBernstein enter into a substantial new line of business, Holding, by virtue of its ownership of AllianceBernstein, would lose its status as a "grandfathered" publicly traded partnership and would become subject to corporate income tax, which would reduce materially Holding's net income and its quarterly distributions to Holding unitholders.

        Earnings (loss) before income taxes and income tax expense consist of:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Earnings (loss) before income taxes:

          

United States

 $177,347 $(120,159)$382,463 

Foreign

  25,018  (88,310) 83,159 
        

Total

 $202,365 $(208,469)$465,622 
        

Income tax expense:

          

Partnership UBT

 $2,626 $8,737 $10,363 

Corporate subsidiaries:

          

Federal

  2,367  10,600  2,570 

State and local

  541  1,772  1,401 

Foreign

  8,852  11,411  25,144 
        

Current tax expense

  14,386  32,520  39,478 

Deferred tax (benefit)

  (622) (29,422) (955)
        

Income tax expense

 $13,764 $3,098 $38,523 
        

Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

20. Income Taxes (Continued)

        The principal reasons for the difference between the effective tax rates and the UBT statutory tax rate of 4.0% are as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in thousands)
 

UBT statutory rate

 $8,095  4.0%$(8,339) 4.0%$18,625  4.0%

Corporate subsidiaries' federal, state, local and foreign income taxes

  12,548  6.2  2,998  (1.4) 25,544  5.5 

Effect of ASC 740 adjustments, miscellaneous taxes, and other

  (9,665) (4.8) 2,560  (1.3) 1,445  0.3 

Income not taxable resulting from use of UBT business apportionment factors and effect of compensation charge

  2,786  1.4  5,879  (2.8) (7,091) (1.5)
                 

Income tax expense and effective tax rate

 $13,764  6.8 $3,098  (1.5)$38,523  8.3 
                 

        Income tax expenses increased $10.7 million, or 344.3%, in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase was primarily due to higher operating income in 2012 (in large part due to the 2011 compensation charge offset by the 2012 real estate charges), partially offset by the UBT tax benefit recorded in the third quarter of 2012 ($5.7 million). In the third quarter of 2012, application of the New York City tax law that sources various types of receipts from services performed by registered brokers and dealers of securities and commodities for purposes of apportioning income resulted in a reduction of our rate of tax for the current year and to the rate of tax that we expect to pay in the future. As a result, we recognized a $5.7 million tax benefit in the third quarter of 2012 relating to our full year 2011 and nine months 2012 UBT.

        Income tax expenses decreased $35.4 million, or 92.0%, in 2011 compared to 2010. Prior to the fourth quarter 2011 compensation charge of $587.1 million, our estimate of our full year 2011 effective tax rate was 7.1%. As a result of the compensation charge, as well as the immediate recognition of the 2011 long-term incentive compensation awards, we had a fourth quarter 2011 effective tax rate of 3.8% (pre-tax loss of $540.2 million and income tax benefit of $20.3 million that resulted in a full-year 2011 pre-tax loss of $208.5 million and income tax expense of $3.1 million). The compensation charge resulted in a one-time change to the historical mix of business between AllianceBernstein, which incurs a 4.0% UBT, and its corporate subsidiaries that incur corporate level income taxes. In addition, the recorded tax benefit associated with the future deliveries of vested Holding Units was based on the current market value in most jurisdictions, which was lower than the grant price of the awards included in the compensation charge. Both contributed to us incurring tax expense of $3.1 million rather than a benefit at the full year estimated effective tax rate of 7.1%.

        We recognize the effects of a tax position in the financial statements only if, as of the reporting date, it is "more likely than not" to be sustained based solely on its technical merits. In making this assessment, we assume that the taxing authority will examine the tax position and have full knowledge of all relevant information.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

20. Income Taxes (Continued)

        A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Balance as of beginning of period

 $4,028 $5,326 $7,365 

Additions for prior year tax positions

  158  190   

Reductions for prior year tax positions

       

Additions for current year tax positions

  918  761  823 

Reductions for current year tax positions

       

Reductions related to closed years/settlements with tax authorities

  (1,432) (2,249) (2,862)
        

Balance as of end of period

 $3,672 $4,028 $5,326 
        

        The amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 when recognized, is recorded as a reduction to income tax expense and reduces the company's effective tax rate.

        Interest and penalties, if any, relating to tax positions are recorded in income tax expense on the consolidated statements of income. The total amount of interest expense (credit) recorded in income tax expense during 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $(0.3) million, $(0.2) million and $(0.1) million, respectively. The total amount of accrued interest recorded on the consolidated statements of financial condition as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are $0.2 million, $0.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively. There were no accrued penalties as of December 31, 2012, 2011 or 2010.

        The company is generally no longer subject to U.S. federal, or state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for any year prior to 2009, except as set forth below.

        The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") initiated an examination of our domestic corporate subsidiaries' federal tax returns for the years 2008 through 2010 in the fourth quarter of 2011. This examination was completed in 2012 and we have received notification that the IRS has accepted our tax returns as filed.

        In addition, examinations of five of AllianceBernstein's domestic corporate subsidiaries were initiated in 2010 and 2011 by state and local taxing authorities. Two of these examinations were closed in 2012 with no change to our tax filings and one of these audits was settled for $0.2 million and the remaining reserves were released. An assessment has been received for the fourth audit for years 2007 through 2010. This matter remains in the appeal stage and we do not believe an increase in the existing reserve is necessary. The fifth audit remains in progress and we do not believe an increase in the reserve is necessary.

        The Canadian Revenue Agency continues their examination of AllianceBernstein's Canadian subsidiary tax returns for the years 2005 through 2007. We have been advised verbally that there will be no change to the tax filing for the year 2005. An initial assessment has been made by the Canadian Revenue Agency with respect to years 2006 and 2007. The assessment is being challenged and remains in the appeal stage. We do not believe an increase to the reserve is necessary. Currently, there are no other income tax examinations at our significant non-U.S. subsidiaries except as noted above. Years


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

20. Income Taxes (Continued)

that remain open and may be subject to examination vary under local law, and range from one to seven years.

        During the third quarter of 2011, the City of New York notified us of an examination of AllianceBernstein's UBT returns for the years 2007 and 2008. The examination was started in the fourth quarter of 2012 and remains in progress. We do not believe an increase in the reserve is necessary.

        Since there are no significant examinations for the years 2009 and forward it is our opinion that there will not be any recognition of unrecognized tax benefits. However, adjustment to the reserve could occur in light of changing facts and circumstances with respect to any future examinations.

        Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The tax effect of significant items comprising the net deferred tax asset (liability) is as follows:

 
 December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Deferred tax asset:

       

Differences between book and tax basis:

       

Benefits from net operating loss carryforwards

 $15,352 $5,138 

Long-term incentive compensation plans

  28,340  35,716 

Other, primarily accrued expenses deductible when paid

  12,825  14,398 
      

  56,517  55,252 

Less: valuation allowance

  (12,789) (5,138)
      

Deferred tax asset

  43,728  50,114 
      

Deferred tax liability:

       

Differences between book and tax basis:

       

Intangible assets

  6,971  14,325 

Translation adjustment

  8,655  9,413 

Other, primarily undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries

    330 
      

Deferred tax liability

  15,626  24,068 
      

Net deferred tax asset

 $28,102 $26,046 
      

        Valuation allowances of $12.8 million and $5.1 million were established during 2012 and 2011, respectively, due to the uncertainty of realizing certain net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards given the future losses expected to be incurred by the applicable subsidiaries. We had NOL carryforwards at December 31, 2012 of approximately $73.7 million in certain foreign locations with an indefinite expiration period.

        The deferred tax asset is included in other assets. Management has determined that realization of the deferred tax asset is more likely than not based on anticipated future taxable income.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

20. Income Taxes (Continued)

        The company provides income taxes on the undistributed earnings of non-U.S. corporate subsidiaries except to the extent that such earnings are permanently invested outside the United States. As of December 31, 2012, $619.9 million of accumulated undistributed earnings of non-U.S. corporate subsidiaries were permanently invested. At existing applicable income tax rates, additional taxes of approximately $24.1 million, net of foreign tax credits, would need to be provided if such earnings were remitted.

21. Business Segment Information

        Management has assessed the requirements of ASC 280,Segment Reporting, and determined that, because we utilize a consolidated approach to assess performance and allocate resources, we have only one operating segment. Enterprise-wide disclosures as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, were as follows:

        Net revenues derived from our investment management, research and related services were as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in millions)
 

Institutions

 $485 $617 $765 

Retail

  1,193  1,093  1,069 

Private client

  586  652  651 

Bernstein research services

  414  437  431 

Other

  62  (47  37 
        

Total revenues

  2,740  2,752  2,953 

Less: Interest expense

  3  2  4 
        

Net revenues

 $2,737 $2,750 $2,949 
        

        Our AllianceBernstein Global High Yield Portfolio, an open-end fund incorporated in Luxembourg (ACATEUH: LX), generated approximately 12%, 10% and 7% of our investment advisory and service fees and 13%, 11% and 8% of our net revenues during 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

21. Business Segment Information (Continued)

        Net revenues and long-lived assets, related to our U.S. and international operations, as of and for the years ended December 31, were:

 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in millions)
 

Net revenues:

          

United States

 $1,700 $1,725 $1,933 

International

  1,037  1,025  1,016 
        

Total

 $2,737 $2,750 $2,949 
        

Long-lived assets:

          

United States

 $3,363 $3,403 $3,448 

International

  52  74  74 
        

Total

 $3,415 $3,477 $3,522 
        

        Company-sponsored mutual funds are distributed to individual investors through broker-dealers, insurance sales representatives, banks, registered investment advisers, financial planners and other financial intermediaries. Certain subsidiaries of AXA, including AXA Advisors, LLC, have entered into selected dealer agreements with AllianceBernstein Investments and have been responsible for 4%, 1% and 2% of our open-end mutual fund sales in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. During 2012, Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC), UBS AG and Citigroup (or their respective subsidiaries) were responsible for approximately 13%, 10% and 6%, respectively, of our open-end mutual fund sales. Neither AXA nor these unaffiliated companies are under any obligation to sell a specific amount of AllianceBernstein Fund shares and each also sells shares of mutual funds that it sponsors and that are sponsored by unaffiliated organizations.

        AXA and the general and separate accounts of AXA Equitable (including investments by the separate accounts of AXA Equitable in the funding vehicle EQ Advisors Trust) accounted for approximately 4%, 4% and 5% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. No single institutional client other than AXA and its subsidiaries accounted for more than 1% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.

22. Related Party Transactions

        Investment management, distribution, shareholder and administrative, and brokerage services are provided to individual investors by means of retail mutual funds sponsored by our company, our subsidiaries and our affiliated joint venture companies. Substantially all of these services are provided under contracts that set forth the services to be provided and the fees to be charged. The contracts are subject to annual review and approval by each of the mutual funds' boards of directors or trustees and,


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

22. Related Party Transactions (Continued)

in certain circumstances, by the mutual funds' shareholders. Revenues for services provided or related to the mutual funds are as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Investment advisory and services fees

 $885,669 $840,165 $778,284 

Distribution revenues

  400,763  351,621  338,597 

Shareholder servicing fees

  89,117  91,931  93,148 

Other revenues

  5,127  5,643  5,726 

Bernstein research services

  133  66  121 

        We provide investment management and certain administration services to AXA and its subsidiaries. In addition, AXA and its subsidiaries distribute company-sponsored mutual funds, for which they receive commissions and distribution payments. Sales of company-sponsored mutual funds through AXA and its subsidiaries, excluding cash management products, aggregated approximately $1.7 billion, $0.4 billion and $0.5 billion for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Also, we are covered by various insurance policies maintained by AXA subsidiaries and we pay fees for technology and other services provided by AXA and its subsidiaries. Aggregate amounts


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

22. Related Party Transactions (Continued)

included in the consolidated financial statements for transactions with AXA and its subsidiaries are as follows:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2012 2011 2010 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Revenues:

          

Investment advisory and services fees

 $113,076 $114,266 $135,004 

Bernstein research services

  982  802  492 

Distribution revenues

  943     

Other revenues

  599  599  583 
        

 $115,600 $115,667 $136,079 
        

Expenses:

          

Commissions and distribution payments to financial intermediaries

 $7,924 $7,411 $8,896 

General and administrative

  19,779  22,191  21,256 

Other

  1,550  1,467  264 
        

 $29,253 $31,069 $30,416 
        

Balance Sheet:

          

Institutional investment advisory and services fees receivable

 $7,878 $9,004 $18,654 

Prepaid insurance

  1,342  1,411  1,199 

Other due (to) from AXA and its subsidiaries

  (3,732) (4,319) (4,732)
        

 $5,488 $6,096 $15,121 
        

        During the first quarter of 2011, AXA sold its 50% interest in our consolidated Australian joint venture to an unaffiliated third party as part of a larger transaction. On March 31, 2011, we purchased that 50% interest from the unaffiliated third party making our Australian entity an indirect wholly owned subsidiary. Investment advisory and services fees earned by this company were approximately $8.5 million for the first three months of 2011 and $37.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, of which approximately $3.0 million and $12.8 million, respectively, were from AXA affiliates and are included in the table above. Minority interest recorded for this company was $0.4 million for the first three months of 2011 and $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

        AllianceBernstein Venture Fund I, L.P. was launched during 2006. It seeks to achieve its investment objective, which is long-term capital appreciation through equity and equity-related investments, by acquiring early stage growth companies in private transactions. One of our subsidiaries is the general partner of the fund and, as a result, the fund is included in our consolidated financial statements, with approximately $47 million, $59 million and $101 million of investments on the consolidated statements of financial condition as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. AXA Equitable holds a 10% limited partnership interest in this fund.

        We maintain an unfunded, non-qualified long-term incentive compensation plan known as the Capital Accumulation Plan and also have assumed obligations under contractual unfunded long-term


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

22. Related Party Transactions (Continued)

incentive compensation arrangements covering certain executives ("Contractual Arrangements"). The Capital Accumulation Plan was frozen on December 31, 1987 and no additional awards have been made. The Board may terminate the Capital Accumulation Plan at any time without cause, in which case our liability would be limited to benefits that have vested. Payment of vested benefits under both the Capital Accumulation Plan and the Contractual Arrangements will generally be made over a ten-year period commencing at retirement age. The General Partner is obligated to make capital contributions to AllianceBernstein in amounts equal to benefits paid under the Capital Accumulation Plan and the Contractual Arrangements. Amounts paid by the General Partner to AllianceBernstein for the Capital Accumulation Plan and the Contractual Arrangements for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $4.4 million, $4.8 million and $4.9 million, respectively.

        The consolidated statements of financial condition include a net receivable from Holding as a result of cash transactions for fees and expense reimbursements. The net receivable balance included in the consolidated statements of financial condition as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was $6.1 million, $2.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

23. Acquisitions

        On October 1, 2010, we acquired SunAmerica's alternative investment group, an experienced team that manages a portfolio of hedge fund and private equity fund investments. The purchase price of this acquisition, accounted for under ASC 805,Business Combinations, was $49.0 million, consisting of $14.3 million of cash payments, $2.5 million of assumed deferred compensation liabilities and $32.2 million of net contingent consideration payable. The net contingent consideration payable consists of the net present value of three annual payments of $1.5 million to SunAmerica based on its assets under management transferred to us in the acquisition and the net present value of projected revenue sharing payments of $35.5 million based on projected newly raised assets under management by the acquired group. This contingent consideration payable was offset by $4.1 million of performance-based fees earned in 2010 determined to be pre-acquisition consideration. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired resulted in the recognition of $46.1 million of goodwill. During 2012 and 2011, no adjustments were made to the contingent consideration payable.

        During the first quarter of 2011, AXA sold its 50% interest in our consolidated Australian joint venture to an unaffiliated third party as part of a larger transaction. On March 31, 2011, we purchased that 50% interest from the unaffiliated third party for $21.4 million, making our Australian entity an indirect wholly owned subsidiary. As a result, we eliminated $32.1 million of non-controlling interests in consolidated entities and increased partner's capital attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders by $10.7 million.

        On May 31, 2011, we acquired Pyrander Capital Management, LLC, an investment management company jointly owned by Caxton Associates L.P. ("Caxton") and Kurt Feuerman, a Caxton portfolio manager. We hired Mr. Feuerman and members of his team from Caxton, and acquired investment management contracts of the investment vehicles the team managed. The purchase price of this acquisition, accounted for under ASC 805,Business Combinations, was $10.2 million, consisting of $5.5 million of cash payments, $4.4 million payable in 2012 and 2013 (if Mr. Feuerman remains with the company) and a miscellaneous liability of $0.3 million. The excess of the purchase price over the


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

23. Acquisitions (Continued)

fair value of identifiable assets acquired resulted in the recognition of $5.7 million of goodwill. We also recorded $2.5 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets relating to the acquired fund's investment management contracts and $2.0 million of definite-lived intangible assets relating to separately managed account relationships. Mr. Feuerman also received two restricted Holding Unit awards; one with a three-year service condition (the award was amended in December 2011 to eliminate the service condition) and one with a five-year service condition (with three specific service dates) and performance conditions (with three specific assets under management targets, later amended to two). As a result of the service conditions at the time of the acquisition, for accounting purposes these awards are considered compensation expense, not part of the purchase price. Also, we were contingently liable to pay Caxton up to an additional $4.4 million if Mr. Feuerman meets all of his service conditions and performance targets. As of December 31, 2012, we accrued $1.5 million of this liability to Caxton due to an amendment to the acquisition agreement eliminating the first of Mr. Feuerman's three performance targets.

        On November 30, 2011, we acquired Taiwan International Investment Management Co. ("TIIM") to expand our business in the Taiwanese market. The purchase price of this acquisition, accounted for under ASC 805,Business Combinations, was a cash payment of $15.0 million, net of cash acquired. The valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired had been determined provisionally as of December 31, 2011. The excess of the purchase price over the current fair value of identifiable net assets acquired resulted in the recognition of $9.8 million of goodwill as of December 31, 2011. The valuation was completed in the first quarter of 2012. As a result, intangible assets relating to customer relationships of $0.3 million were recognized retrospectively as of December 31, 2011 with a corresponding reduction in goodwill.

        The 2010 and 2011 acquisitions have not had a significant impact on 2012, 2011 or 2010 revenues and earnings. As a result, we have not provided supplemental pro forma information.

24. Accounting Pronouncements

        In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11,Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The amended standard requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. This amendment is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

25. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

 
 Quarters Ended 2012 
 
 December 31 September 30 June 30 March 31 
 
 (in thousands, except per unit amounts)
 

Net revenues

 $704,607 $708,158 $642,163 $681,809 

Net income (loss) attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $71,699 $(44,246)$74,185 $87,278 

Basic net income (loss) per AllianceBernstein Unit(1)

 $0.26 $(0.16)$0.26 $0.31 

Diluted net income (loss) per AllianceBernstein Unit(1)

 $0.26 $(0.16)$0.26 $0.31 

Cash distributions per AllianceBernstein Unit(2)(3)

 $0.38 $0.41 $0.26 $0.31 

 

 
 Quarters Ended 2011 
 
 December 31 September 30 June 30 March 31 
 
 (in thousands, except per unit amounts)
 

Net revenues

 $624,978 $641,529 $727,994 $755,390 

Net (loss) income attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $(516,360)$90,981 $114,139 $136,472 

Basic net (loss) income per AllianceBernstein Unit(1)

 $(1.84)$0.32 $0.41 $0.49 

Diluted net (loss) income per AllianceBernstein Unit(1)

 $(1.84)$0.32 $0.41 $0.48 

Cash distributions per AllianceBernstein Unit(2)(4)

 $0.17 $0.32 $0.41 $0.48 

(1)
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit are computed independently for each of the periods presented. Accordingly, the sum of the quarterly net income (loss) per unit amounts may not agree to the total for the year.

(2)
Declared and paid during the following quarter.

(3)
The third and fourth quarter 2012 distributions exclude the impact of non-cash real estate charges of $168.1 million and $38.9 million, respectively.

(4)
The fourth quarter 2011 distribution excludes the impact of the $587.1 million one-time, non-cash long-term incentive compensation charge.

Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

(in thousands, except unit amounts)


 June 30,
2013
 December 31,
2012
  September 30,
2013
 December 31,
2012
 

 (unaudited)
  
  (unaudited)
  
 

ASSETS

  

Cash and cash equivalents

 $571,274 $627,182  $607,193 $627,182 

Cash and securities segregated, at fair value (cost: $834,440 and $1,551,177)

 834,505 1,551,326 

Cash and securities segregated, at fair value (cost: $834,198 and $1,551,177)

 834,356 1,551,326 

Receivables, net:

  

Brokers and dealers

 324,114 408,037  312,493 408,037 

Brokerage clients

 1,079,608 942,034  998,672 942,034 

Fees

 245,929 265,685  241,219 265,685 

Investments:

  

Long-term incentive compensation-related

 108,432 122,977  114,631 122,977 

Other

 577,786 609,357  549,836 609,357 

Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net

 183,577 196,125  176,311 196,125 

Goodwill

 2,954,327 2,954,327  2,954,327 2,954,327 

Intangible assets, net

 158,358 169,208  152,982 169,208 

Deferred sales commissions, net

 76,319 95,430  74,812 95,430 

Other assets

 187,588 173,362  176,860 173,362 
          

Total assets

 $7,301,817 $8,115,050  $7,193,692 $8,115,050 
          

LIABILITIES AND CAPITAL

  

Liabilities:

  

Payables:

  

Brokers and dealers

 $283,388 $220,736  $244,392 $220,736 

Securities sold not yet purchased

 52,834 63,838  59,682 63,838 

Brokerage clients

 1,545,006 2,563,061  1,552,952 2,563,061 

AllianceBernstein mutual funds

 100,323 156,679  96,299 156,679 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 522,903 499,076  524,368 499,076 

Accrued compensation and benefits

 518,051 485,229  638,902 485,229 

Debt

 346,265 323,163  163,000 323,163 
          

Total liabilities

 3,368,770 4,311,782  3,279,595 4,311,782 
          

Commitments and contingencies (See Note 12)

  

Capital:

  

General Partner

 41,597 41,213  38,932 41,213 

Limited partners: 278,374,893 and 277,600,901 units issued and outstanding

 4,202,038 4,165,461 

Limited partners: 264,472,328 and 277,600,901 units issued and outstanding

 3,938,045 4,165,461 

Receivables from affiliates

 (16,537) (8,441) (13,338) (8,441)

Holding Units held for long-term incentive compensation plans

 (274,683) (389,941) (37,169) (389,941)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

 (66,631) (48,526) (57,667) (48,526)
          

Partners' capital attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 3,885,784 3,759,766  3,868,803 3,759,766 

Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities

 47,263 43,502  45,294 43,502 
          

Total capital

 3,933,047 3,803,268  3,914,097 3,803,268 
          

Total liabilities and capital

 $7,301,817 $8,115,050  $7,193,692 $8,115,050 
          

   

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(in thousands, except per unit amounts)

(unaudited)


 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 

 2013 2012 2013 2012  2013 2012 2013 2012 

Revenues:

  

Investment advisory and services fees

 $459,065 $423,863 $902,902 $849,423  $449,250 $464,332 $1,352,152 $1,313,755 

Bernstein research services

 114,771 103,008 224,456 209,351  107,355 100,637 331,811 309,988 

Distribution revenues

 120,775 97,137 239,520 188,097  113,968 105,605 353,488 293,702 

Dividend and interest income

 4,534 4,981 8,980 9,387  4,419 5,071 13,399 14,458 

Investment gains (losses)

 8,350 (10,852) 15,301 20,106  6,460 7,210 21,761 27,316 

Other revenues

 27,455 24,844 53,755 49,129  25,272 26,154 79,027 75,283 
                  

Total revenues

 734,950 642,981 1,444,914 1,325,493  706,724 709,009 2,151,638 2,034,502 

Less: Interest expense

 675 818 1,517 1,521  646 851 2,163 2,372 
                  

Net revenues

 734,275 642,163 1,443,397 1,323,972  706,078 708,158 2,149,475 2,032,130 
                  

Expenses:

  

Employee compensation and benefits

 306,487 272,821 607,722 575,364  302,526 300,869 910,248 876,233 

Promotion and servicing:

  

Distribution-related payments

 111,386 86,120 220,666 165,989  101,368 94,779 322,034 260,768 

Amortization of deferred sales commissions

 10,325 10,171 21,399 18,438  10,363 10,658 31,762 29,096 

Other

 56,332 51,775 107,324 101,509  48,140 47,514 155,464 149,023 

General and administrative:

  

General and administrative

 104,461 129,310 209,750 254,220  104,770 135,729 314,520 389,949 

Real estate charges

 1,935 6,787 2,573 16,056  24,125 168,086 26,698 184,142 

Interest on borrowings

 793 892 1,776 1,725  612 877 2,388 2,602 

Amortization of intangible assets

 5,902 5,540 11,335 10,679  5,556 5,467 16,891 16,146 
                  

Total expenses

 597,621 563,416 1,182,545 1,143,980  597,460 763,979 1,780,005 1,907,959 
                  

Operating income

 136,654 78,747 260,852 179,992 

Operating income (loss)

 108,618 (55,821) 369,470 124,171 

Income taxes

 
9,564
 
5,838
 
20,731
 
12,541
  
7,257
 
(7,572

)
 
27,988
 
4,969
 
                  

Net income

 127,090 72,909 240,121 167,451 

Net income (loss)

 101,361 (48,249) 341,482 119,202 

Net income (loss) of consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests

 
6,376
 
(1,276

)
 
4,891
 
5,988
  
1,413
 
(4,003

)
 
6,304
 
1,985
 
                  

Net income attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $120,714 $74,185 $235,230 $161,463 

Net income (loss) attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $99,948 $(44,246)$335,178 $117,217 
                  

Net income per AllianceBernstein Unit:

 

Net income (loss) per AllianceBernstein Unit:

 

Basic

 $0.43 $0.26 $0.84 $0.58  $0.37 $(0.16)$1.21 $0.42 
                  

Diluted

 $0.43 $0.26 $0.83 $0.58  $0.37 $(0.16)$1.21 $0.42 
                  

   

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(in thousands)

(unaudited)


 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 

 2013 2012 2013 2012  2013 2012 2013 2012 

Net income

 $127,090 $72,909 $240,121 $167,451 

Net income (loss)

 $101,361 $(48,249)$341,482 $119,202 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

  

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 (8,357) (3,886) (18,677) (2,011) 9,057 6,197 (9,620) 4,186 

Income tax benefit

  796  796     796 
                  

Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax

 (8,357) (3,090) (18,677) (1,215) 9,057 6,197 (9,620) 4,982 

Unrealized (losses) gains on investments:

 

Unrealized (losses) gains arising during period

 (439) 65 303 770 

Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income

 6 18 6 18 

Unrealized gains on investments:

 

Unrealized gains arising during period

 137 321 440 1,091 

Less: reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income

  (45) 6 (27)
                  

Change in unrealized (losses) gains on investments

 (445) 47 297 752 

Income tax benefit (expense)

 62 (26) (321) (462)

Change in unrealized gains on investments

 137 366 434 1,118 

Income tax (expense)

 (25) (103) (346) (565)
                  

Unrealized (losses) gains on investments, net of tax

 (383) 21 (24) 290 

Unrealized gains on investments, net of tax

 112 263 88 553 

Changes in employee benefit related items:

  

Amortization of transition asset

 (11) (36) (47) (72)  (35) (47) (107)

Amortization of prior service cost

 27 27 54 54  (872) 26 (818) 80 

Recognized actuarial loss

 295 227 590 154  606 211 1,196 365 
                  

Changes in employee benefit related items

 311 218 597 136  (266) 202 331 338 

Income tax (expense)

 (3) (3) (99) (3)

Income tax benefit (expense)

 3 (287) (96) (290)
                  

Employee benefit related items, net of tax

 308 215 498 133  (263) (85) 235 48 
                  

Other comprehensive (loss) income

 (8,432) (2,854) (18,203) (792)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 8,906 6,375 (9,297) 5,583 

Less: Comprehensive income (loss) in consolidated entities attributable to non-controlling interests

 6,268 (1,389) 4,793 5,927  1,354 (3,933) 6,147 1,994 
                  

Comprehensive income attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $112,390 $71,444 $217,125 $160,732 

Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $108,913 $(37,941)$326,038 $122,791 
                  

   

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

(unaudited)


 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  Nine Months Ended September 30, 

 2013 2012  2013 2012 

Cash flows from operating activities:

  

Net income

 $240,121 $167,451  $341,482 $119,202 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

  

Amortization of deferred sales commissions

 21,399 18,438  31,762 29,096 

Amortization of non-cash long-term incentive compensation

 8,538 7,782  13,372 11,996 

Depreciation and other amortization

 31,085 41,209  45,763 59,968 

Unrealized (gains) on long-term incentive compensation-related investments

 (5,577) (8,819) (10,711) (15,128)

Unrealized (gains) on consolidated venture capital fund

 (18,162) (1,029) (20,601) (13,433)

Unrealized (gains) on other investments

 (1,830) (18,713) (4,993) (36,061)

Real estate asset write-off charge

 129 1,675  3,764 33,017 

Other, net

 (11,179) 2,215  (4,889) (248)

Changes in assets and liabilities:

  

Decrease in segregated cash and securities

 716,821 125,135  716,970 331,548 

(Increase) in receivables

 (122,385) (93,109)

Decrease (increase) in receivables

 85,778 (32,660)

Decrease in investments

 70,563 55,373  111,276 134,197 

(Increase) in deferred sales commissions

 (2,288) (54,023) (11,144) (64,690)

(Increase) in other assets

 (30,577) (19,918) (18,319) (3,583)

(Decrease) in payables

 (925,748) (90,281) (1,067,994) (361,005)

(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses

 (26,147) 4,649  (13,859) 129,750 

Increase in accrued compensation and benefits

 165,979 102,500  284,502 209,499 
          

Net cash provided by operating activities

 110,742 240,535  482,159 531,465 
          

Cash flows from investing activities:

  

Purchases of investments

  (96) (7,950) (96)

Proceeds from sales of investments

 43 118  43 423 

Purchases of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements

 (8,667) (11,139) (13,069) (15,479)

Proceeds from sales of furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements

 87 3,221  11 3,221 
          

Net cash used in investing activities

 (8,537) (7,896) (20,965) (11,931)
          

Cash flows from financing activities:

  

Issuance (repayment) of commercial paper, net

 22,339 (169,719)

Increase in overdrafts payable

 53,724 16,750 

(Repayment) of commercial paper, net

 (181,059) (204,716)

Proceeds from bank loan

 20,000  

Increase (decrease) in overdrafts payable

 40,149 (1,318)

Distributions to General Partner and Unitholders

 (220,647) (134,095) (338,112) (206,694)

Distributions to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities

 (1,032) (8,453) (4,355) (9,833)

Capital contributions from General Partner

 1,382 1,684  2,001 2,522 

Capital contributions from Holding

 2,707  

Additional investments by Holding from distributions paid to AllianceBernstein consolidated rabbi trust

 11,871 3,457  12,987 6,071 

Additional investments by Holding with proceeds from exercise of compensatory options to buy Holding Units

 13,281   13,859  

Purchases of Holding Units to fund long-term incentive compensation plan awards, net

 (26,967) (95,143) (44,903) (134,937)

Purchases of AllianceBernstein Units

 (117) (3,000) (462) (3,049)

Debt issuance costs

  (1,750)  (1,933)

Other

 (10) (21) (13) (24)
          

Net cash used in financing activities

 (146,176) (390,290) (477,201) (553,911)
          

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 (11,937) 1,392  (3,982) 6,264 
          

Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 (55,908) (156,259)

Cash and cash equivalents as of beginning of the period

 627,182 638,681  627,182 638,681 
          

Cash and cash equivalents as of end of the period

 $571,274 $482,422  $607,193 $610,568 
          

   

See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements JuneSeptember 30, 2013

(unaudited)

        The words "we" and "our" refer collectively to AllianceBernstein L.P. and its subsidiaries ("AllianceBernstein"), or to their officers and employees. Similarly, the word "company" refers to AllianceBernstein. These statements should be read in conjunction with AllianceBernstein's audited consolidated financial statements included in this proxy statement/prospectus for the year ended December 31, 2012.


1. Business Description, Organization and Basis of Presentation

        We provide research, diversified investment management and related services globally to a broad range of clients. Our principal services include:

        We also provide distribution, shareholder servicing and administrative services to the mutual funds we sponsor.

        Our high-quality, in-depth research is the foundation of our business. Our research disciplines include fundamental, quantitative and economic research and currency forecasting. In addition, we have created several specialized research initiatives, including research examining global strategic developments that can affect multiple industries and geographies.

        We provide a broad range of investment services with expertise in:


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements JuneSeptember 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

1. Business Description, Organization and Basis of Presentation (Continued)

        In providing these services, we focus onconsider various portfolio characteristics, including market capitalization (e.g.(e.g.large-,large, mid- and small-cap equities), term (e.g., long-, intermediate- and short-duration debt securities), and geography (e.g., U.S., international, global, emerging markets, regional and local), in major markets around the world.

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, AXA, asociété anonyme organized under the laws of France and the holding company for an international group of insurance and related financial services companies, through certain of its subsidiaries ("AXA and its subsidiaries") owned approximately 1.4%1.6% of the issued and outstanding units representing assignments of beneficial ownership of limited partnership interests in AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. ("Holding Units").

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, the ownership structure of AllianceBernstein, expressed as a percentage of general and limited partnership interests, was as follows:

AXA and its subsidiaries

  60.964.0%

Holding

  37.734.5 

Unaffiliated holders

  1.41.5 
    

  100.0%
    

        AllianceBernstein Corporation (an indirect wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of AXA, "General Partner") is the general partner of both AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. ("Holding") and AllianceBernstein. AllianceBernstein Corporation owns 100,000 general partnership units in Holding and a 1% general partnership interest in AllianceBernstein. Including both the general partnership and limited partnership interests in Holding and AllianceBernstein, AXA and its subsidiaries had an approximate 64.3%64.6% economic interest in AllianceBernstein as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013.

        The interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the interim results, have been made. The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the interim reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The December 31, 2012 condensed consolidated statement of financial condition was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

        The condensed consolidated financial statements include AllianceBernstein and its majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries. All significant inter-company transactions and balances among the consolidated entities have been eliminated.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements JuneSeptember 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

1. Business Description, Organization and Basis of Presentation (Continued)

        During 2013, we reclassified prior-period amounts relating to the servicing portion of the investment advisory base fees earned by AllianceBernstein Japan Ltd. (a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein) for the distribution of local-market funds from investment advisory base fees to distribution revenues in the condensed consolidated statement of income to conform to the current year's presentation. This reclassification is consistent with the methodology used by AllianceBernstein Luxembourg S.A. (a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein, "AllianceBernstein Luxembourg") related to the distribution of Non-U.S. Funds.


2. Accounting Pronouncements

        In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2011-11,Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The amended standard requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. We adopted this standard effective as of January 1, 2013 (seeNote 10) and there was no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

        In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02,Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The standard requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. We adopted this standard effective as of January 1, 2013. However, no additional disclosures are required because amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income are not material.

        In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-05, Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity. The amendment is effective prospectively for fiscal years (and interim reporting periods within those years) beginning after December 15, 2013 and is not expected to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

        In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. The amendment is effective prospectively for fiscal years (and interim periods within those years) beginning after December 15, 2013 and is not expected to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.


3. Long-term Incentive Compensation Plans

        We maintain several unfunded, non-qualified long-term incentive compensation plans under which annual awards to employees are made generally in the fourth quarter.

        Awards granted in the fourth quarter of 2012 allowed participants to allocate their awards between restricted Holding Units and deferred cash. Participants (except certain members of senior


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

3. Long-term Incentive Compensation Plans (Continued)

management) generally could allocate up to 50% of their awards to deferred cash, not to exceed a total of $250,000 per award, and had until mid-January 2013 to make their elections. The number of restricted Holding Units issued equaled the remaining dollar value of the award divided by the average of the closing prices of a Holding Unit for a five business day period in January 2013 after participants made their elections.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

        We recognize compensation expense related to equity compensation grants in the financial statements using the fair value method. Fair value of restricted Holding Unit awards is the closing price of a Holding Unit on the grant date; fair value of options is determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. Under the fair value method, compensatory expense is measured at the grant date based on the estimated fair value of the award and is recognized over the required service period. Prior to a change made to the employee long-term incentive compensation award program in the fourth quarter of 2011, an employee's service requirement was typically the same as the delivery dates. This change eliminated employee service requirements, but did not modify delivery dates contained in the original award agreements.

        In January 2013, 6.5 million restricted Holding Units held in the consolidated rabbi trust were awarded for the 2012 awards and we reclassified $129.2 million of the liability to partners' capital as equity-based awards.

        Grants of restricted Holding Units and options to buy Holding Units are typically awarded to eligible members of the Board of Directors ("Eligible Directors") of the General Partner during the second quarter. Restricted Holding Units are distributed on the third anniversary of the grant date and the options become exercisable ratably over three years. These restricted Holding Units and options are not forfeitable (except if the Eligible Director is terminated for "Cause,""Cause", as that term is defined in the applicable award agreement). Due to there being no service requirement, we fully expense these awards on each grant date.

        We fund our restricted Holding Unit awards either by purchasing Holding Units on the open market or purchasing newly issuednewly-issued Holding Units from Holding, all of which are held in a consolidated rabbi trust until they are either retired or distributed to employees upon vesting. In accordance with the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of AllianceBernstein ("AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement"), when AllianceBernstein purchases newly issuednewly-issued Holding Units from Holding, Holding is required to use the proceeds it receives from AllianceBernstein to purchase the equivalent number of newly issuednewly-issued AllianceBernstein Units, thus increasing its percentage ownership interest in AllianceBernstein. Holding Units held in the consolidated rabbi trust are corporate assets in the name of the trust and are available to the general creditors of AllianceBernstein.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

3. Long-term Incentive Compensation Plans (Continued)

        During the secondthird quarter and first sixnine months of 2013, we purchased 0.30.8 million and 1.32.1 million Holding Units for $7.4$16.3 million and $27.0$43.3 million, respectively (on a trade date basis). These amounts reflect open-market purchases of 0.30.8 million and 1.11.9 million Holding Units for $7.2$15.3 million and $23.2$38.5 million, respectively, with the remainder relating to purchases of Holding Units from employees to allow them to fulfill statutory tax withholding requirements at the time of distribution of long-term incentive compensation awards, offset by Holding Units purchased by employees as part of a distribution reinvestment election.

        Since the third quarter of 2011, each quarter we have implemented plans each quarter to repurchase Holding Units pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"). A Rule 10b5-1 plan allows a company to repurchase its shares at times when it otherwise might be prevented from doing so because of self-imposed trading blackout periods and because it possesses


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

material non-public information. Each broker we select has the authority under the terms and limitations specified in the plan to repurchase Holding Units on our behalf in accordance with the terms of the plan. Repurchases are subject to SEC regulations as well as certain price, market volume and timing constraints specified in the plan. The plan adopted during the secondthird quarter of 2013 expired at the close of business on July 30,October 23, 2013. We may adopt additional Rule 10b5-1 plans in the future to engage in open-market purchases of Holding Units to help fund anticipated obligations under our incentive compensation award program and for other corporate purposes.

        We granted to employees and Eligible Directors 6.86.9 million restricted Holding Unit awards (including 6.5 million granted in January 2013 for 2012 year-end awards) during the first sixnine months of 2013. To fund these awards, we allocated previously repurchased Holding Units that had been held in AllianceBernstein's consolidated rabbi trust. There were approximately 13.1 million unallocated Holding Units remaining in the consolidated rabbi trust as of June 30, 2013.

        Effective July 1, 2013, management of AllianceBernstein and Holding retired all unallocated Holding Units in AllianceBernstein's consolidated rabbi trust. To retire such units, AllianceBernstein delivered the unallocated Holding Units held in its consolidated rabbi trust to Holding in exchange for the same amount of AllianceBernstein units. Each entity then retired their respective units. As a result, on July 1, 2013, each of AllianceBernstein's and Holding's units outstanding decreased by approximately 13.1 million units. AllianceBernstein and Holding intend to retire additional units as AllianceBernstein purchases Holding Units on the open market. Holding will then newly issue Holding Units to fund AllianceBernstein's restricted Holding Unit awards in exchange for newly issuednewly-issued AllianceBernstein units.

        Generally, when a corporate entity repurchases its shares, they no longer are deemed outstanding. Because of our two-tier partnership structure, Holding Units purchased by AllianceBernstein and held in its consolidated rabbi trust are considered outstanding (unlike repurchased shares of a single corporate entity). Accordingly, management's decision to retire repurchased Holding Units rather than allowing them to remain outstanding in the rabbi trust more closely aligns the effect of our Holding Unit purchases with that of corporate entities that repurchase their shares.

        During the first sixnine months of 2013, Holding issued 778,739812,642 Holding Units upon exercise of options to buy Holding Units. Holding used the proceeds of $13.3$13.9 million to purchase the equivalent number of newly issuednewly-issued AllianceBernstein Units.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

4. Cash Distributions

        AllianceBernstein is required to distribute all of its Available Cash Flow, as defined in the AllianceBernstein Partnership Agreement, to its Unitholdersunitholders and to the General Partner. Available Cash Flow can be summarized as the cash flow received by AllianceBernstein from operations minus such amounts as the General Partner determines, in its sole discretion, should be retained by AllianceBernstein for use in its business, or plus such amounts as the General Partner determines, in its sole discretion, should be released from previously retained cash flow.

        The General Partner computes cash flow received from operations by determining the sum of:


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

        and then subtracting from this amount the sum of:

        On July 31,October 24, 2013, the General Partner declared a distribution of $0.44$0.46 per AllianceBernstein Unit, representing a distribution of Available Cash Flow for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013. The General Partner, as a result of its 1% general partnership interest, is entitled to receive 1% of each distribution. The distribution is payable on August 29,November 21, 2013 to holders of record on August 12,November 4, 2013.


5. Real Estate Charges

        During 2010, we performed a comprehensive review of our real estate requirements in New York in connection with our workforce reductions commencing in 2008. As a result, during 2010 we decided to sub-lease over 380,000 square feet in New York (in excess of 80% of this space has been sublet) and largely consolidate our New York-based employees into two office locations from three.

        During the third quarter of 2012, in an effort to further reduce our global real estate footprint, we completed a comprehensive review of our worldwide office locations and began implementing a global space consolidation plan. As a result, our intention is to sub-lease approximately 510,000 square feet of office space (nearly 50% of this space has been sublet), over 70% of which is New York office space (in addition to the 380,000 square foot space reduction in 2010), with the remainder composed of office space in England, Australia and various U.S. locations. We expect that the actions we are taking to vacate and market space for sublease will result over time in non-cash real estate charges of $225 million to $250 million, with $202.6 million of the charges having been recorded during 2012. These charges are in addition to the earlier non-cash real estate charges for New York City office space we recorded (related to the 380,000 square foot space reduction in 2010).

        During the first six months of 2013, we recorded real estate charges of $2.6 million, composed of $2.5 million resulting from a change in estimates relating to previously recorded real estate charges ($2.2 million related to the 2010 and 2012 charges and $0.3 million related to other real estate charges) and $0.1 million relating to the write-off of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements JuneSeptember 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

5. Real Estate Charges (Continued)

        During the first nine months of 2013, we recorded real estate charges of $26.7 million, composed of $16.1 million resulting from a change in estimates relating to previously recorded real estate charges ($15.8 million relates to the 2010 and 2012 plans and $0.3 million to other real estate charges), $0.2 million for the write-off of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment relating to the 2012 plan and new real estate charges of $10.4 million ($1.5 million relates to the 2012 plan, $5.3 million relates to other real estate charges and $3.6 million relating to the write-off of leasehold improvements, furniture and equipment).

        The following table summarizes the activity in the liability account relating to our 2010 and 2012 office space consolidation initiatives for the following periods:


 Six Months
Ended
June 30,
2013
 Twelve Months
Ended
December 31,
2012
  Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
 Twelve Months
Ended
December 31,
2012
 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Balance as of beginning of period

 $238,784 $71,164  $238,784 $71,164 

Expense incurred

 2,150 181,589  17,388 181,589 

Deferred rent

 122 27,000  327 27,000 

Payments made

 (36,719) (42,833) (48,636) (42,833)

Interest accretion

 2,274 1,864  3,398 1,864 
          

Balance as of end of period

 $206,611 $238,784  $211,261 $238,784 
          


6. Net Income Per Unit

        Basic net income per unit is derived by reducing net income for the 1% general partnership interest and dividing the remaining 99% by the basic weighted average number of units outstanding for each period. Diluted net income per unit is derived by reducing net income for the 1% general partnership interest and dividing the remaining 99% by the total of the basic weighted average number of units outstanding and the dilutive unit equivalents resulting from outstanding compensatory options to buy Holding Units as follows:


 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 

 2013 2012 2013 2012  2013 2012 2013 2012 

 (in thousands, except per unit amounts)
  (in thousands, except per unit amounts)
 

Net income attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $120,714 $74,185 $235,230 $161,463 

Net income (loss) attributable to AllianceBernstein Unitholders

 $99,948 $(44,246)$335,178 $117,217 
                  

Weighted average units outstanding—basic

 278,209 277,820 277,999 277,833  264,709 277,612 273,521 277,759 

Dilutive effect of compensatory options to buy Holding Units

 1,251  1,111   756  994  
                  

Weighted average units outstanding—diluted

 279,460 277,820 279,110 277,833  265,465 277,612 274,515 277,759 
                  

Basic net income per AllianceBernstein Unit

 $0.43 $0.26 $0.84 $0.58 

Basic net income (loss) per AllianceBernstein Unit

 $0.37 $(0.16)$1.21 $0.42 
                  

Diluted net income per AllianceBernstein Unit

 $0.43 $0.26 $0.83 $0.58 

Diluted net income (loss) per AllianceBernstein Unit

 $0.37 $(0.16)$1.21 $0.42 
                  

Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

6. Net Income Per Unit (Continued)

        For the three months and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013, we excluded 2,979,9353,045,173 and 2,974,935 options, respectively, from the diluted net income per unit computation due to their anti-dilutive effect. For the three months and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2012, we excluded 9,036,8459,032,095 options from the diluted net income per unit computation due to their anti-dilutive effect.

        As discussed in Note 3, on July 1, 2013, management of AllianceBernstein and Holding retired all unallocated Holding Units in AllianceBernstein's consolidated rabbi trust, and continued to retire units during the third quarter of 2013 as we purchased Holding Units on the open market.


7. Cash and Securities Segregated Under Federal Regulations and Other Requirements

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, $0.8 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively, of United States Treasury Bills were segregated in a special reserve bank custody account for the exclusive benefit


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

of brokerage customers of Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., LLC (a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein, "SCB LLC") under Rule 15c3-3 of the Exchange Act.

        AllianceBernstein Investments, Inc. ("AllianceBernstein Investments"), a wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of AllianceBernstein and the distributor of company-sponsored mutual funds, maintains several special bank accounts for the exclusive benefit of customers. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, $39.9$39.6 million and $42.2 million, respectively, of cash was segregated in these bank accounts.


8. Investments

        Investments consist of:


 June 30,
2013
 December 31,
2012
  September 30,
2013
 December 31,
2012
 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Available-for-sale (primarily seed capital)

 $12,423 $13,361  $20,612 $13,361 

Trading:

  

Long-term incentive compensation-related

 77,802 90,825  83,336 90,825 

United States Treasury Bills

 27,996 27,982  27,987 27,982 

Seed capital

 276,365 307,795  253,529 307,795 

Equities and exchange-traded options

 61,640 48,937  69,801 48,937 

Investments in limited partnership hedge funds:

  

Long-term incentive compensation-related

 30,630 32,152  31,295 32,152 

Seed capital

 94,991 109,328  78,541 109,328 

Consolidated private equity fund (10% seed capital)

 49,725 47,045  49,447 47,045 

Private equity (seed capital)

 46,401 47,853  44,996 47,853 

Other

 8,245 7,056  4,923 7,056 
          

Total investments

 $686,218 $732,334  $664,467 $732,334 
          

        Total investments related to long-term incentive compensation obligations of $108.4$114.6 million and $123.0 million as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, consist of company-sponsored mutual funds and hedge funds. We typically made investments in our services that were notionally elected by long-term incentive compensation plan participants and maintained them (and


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

8. Investments (Continued)

continue to maintain them) in a consolidated rabbi trust or separate custodial account. The rabbi trust and custodial account enable us to hold such investments separate from our other assets for the purpose of settling our obligations to participants. The investments held in the rabbi trust and custodial account remain available to the general creditors of AllianceBernstein.

        The underlying investments of the hedge funds in which we invest include long and short positions in equity securities, fixed income securities (including various agency and non-agency asset-based securities), currencies, commodities and derivatives (including various swaps and forward contracts). These investments are valued at quoted market prices or, where quoted market prices are not available, are fair valued based on the pricing policies and procedures of the underlying funds.

        United States Treasury Bills are held by SCB LLC in its investment account, the majority of which are pledged as collateral with clearing organizations. These clearing organizations have the ability by contract or custom to sell or re-pledge this collateral.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

        We provide seed capital to our investment teams to develop new products and services for our clients.

        Trading securities also include long positions in corporate equities and long exchange-traded options traded through our options desk.


9. Derivative Instruments

        We enter into various futures, forwards and swaps to economically hedge certain of our seed money investments. In addition, we have currency forwards that economically hedge certain cash accounts. We do not hold any derivatives designated in a formal hedge relationship under ASC 815-10,Derivatives and Hedging.

        The following tables present the notional value and fair value as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 for derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments:


  
 Fair Value   
 Fair Value 

 Notional
Value
 Asset
Derivatives
 Liability
Derivatives
  Notional
Value
 Asset
Derivatives
 Liability
Derivatives
 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

June 30, 2013:

 

September 30, 2013:

 

Exchange-traded futures

 $90,115 $1,619 $70  $70,464 $700 $354 

Currency forwards

 104,553 716 477  108,841 523 839 

Interest rate swaps

 56,755 705 534  32,365 788 598 

Credit default swaps

 19,625 374 7  50,430 944 347 

Option swaps

 118 94 44  98 136 39 

Total return swaps

 106,123 4,118 146  99,804 1,490 1,612 
              

Total derivatives

 $377,289 $7,626 $1,278  $362,002 $4,581 $3,789 
              

Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

9. Derivative Instruments (Continued)


 
  
 Fair Value 
 
 Notional
Value
 Asset
Derivatives
 Liability
Derivatives
 
 
 (in thousands)
 

December 31, 2012:

          

Exchange-traded futures

 $89,901 $64 $1,598 

Currency forwards

  80,445  473  429 

Interest rate swaps

  55,435  73  888 

Credit default swaps

  53,775  457  272 

Option swaps

  103  83  92 

Total return swaps

  90,673  1,475  3,791 
        

Total derivatives

 $370,332 $2,625 $7,070 
        

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the derivative assets and liabilities are included in both receivables and payables to brokers and dealers on our condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

        The following table presents the gains and losses recognized in investment gains (losses) in the condensed consolidated statements of income:


 Three Months
Ended June 30,
 Six Months
Ended June 30,
  Three Months
Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
 

 2013 2012 2013 2012  2013 2012 2013 2012 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Exchange-traded futures

 $1,686 $8,049 $(2,245)$(8,548) $(4,664)$(5,608)$(6,909)$(14,156)

Currency forwards

 206 1,365 382 1,184  (2,365) (1,019) (1,983) 165 

Interest rate swaps

 223 (1,460) 506 (723) (169) (699) 337 (1,422)

Credit default swaps

 111 (752) (1) (3,351) (506) (3,751) (507) (7,102)

Options swaps

 (62) (89) (186) (89) (29) (222) (215) (311)

Total return swaps

 2,774 (133) (601) (2,555) (2,030) (2,311) (2,631) (4,866)
                  

Balance as of end of period

 $4,938 $6,980 $(2,145)$(14,082) $(9,763)$(13,610)$(11,908)$(27,692)
                  

        We may be exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivative financial instruments. We take steps to minimize our counterparty exposure through a credit review and approval process. In addition, we executed various collateral arrangements with counterparties to the over-the-counter derivative transactions that require both pledging and accepting collateral in the form of cash. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we held $3.9$1.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively, of cash collateral payable to trade counterparties. This obligation to return cash is reported in payables to brokers and dealers in our condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

        Although notional amount is the most commonly used measure of volume in the derivative market, it is not used as a measure of credit risk. Generally, the current credit exposure of our derivative contracts is limited to the net positive estimated fair value of derivative contracts at the reporting date


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

9. Derivative Instruments (Continued)

after taking into consideration the existence of netting agreements and any collateral received. A derivative with positive value (a derivative asset) indicates existence of credit risk because the counterparty would owe us if the contract were closed. Alternatively, a derivative contract with negative value (a derivative liability) indicates we would owe money to the counterparty if the contract were closed. Generally, if there is more than one derivative transaction with a single counterparty, a master netting arrangement exists with respect to derivative transactions with that counterparty to provide for aggregate net settlement.

        Certain of our standardized contracts for over-the-counter derivative transactions ("ISDA Master Agreements") contain credit risk related contingent provisions regarding each counterparty's credit rating. In some ISDA Master Agreements, if a counterparty's credit rating (or in some agreements, our AUM) falls below a specified threshold, either a default or a termination event permitting the counterparty to terminate the ISDA Master Agreement would be triggered. In all agreements that provide for collateralization, various levels of collateralization of net liability positions are applicable, depending on the credit rating of the counterparty. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we delivered $4.7$5.0 million and $8.4 million, respectively, of cash collateral into brokerage accounts, which is reported in cash and cash equivalents in our condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements June 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)


10. Offsetting Assets and Liabilities

        Effective January 1, 2013, we adopted ASU 2011-11,Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The amended standard requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. Derivative instruments (seeNote 9), which are subject to master netting arrangements, are not considered material and are excluded from the below disclosures.

        The following table presents offsetting of securities borrowed as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


 Gross
Amounts of
Recognized
Assets
 Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
 Net Amounts
of Assets
Presented in
the Statement
of Financial
Position
 Financial
Instruments
 Cash
Collateral
Pledged
 Net Amount  Gross
Amounts of
Recognized
Assets
 Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
 Net Amounts
of Assets
Presented in
the Statement
of Financial
Position
 Financial
Instruments
 Cash
Collateral
Pledged
 Net Amount 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

June 30, 2013

 $109,406 $ $109,406 $ $109,406 $ 

September 30, 2013

 $61,488 $ $61,488 $ $61,488 $ 
                          

December 31, 2012

 $106,350 $ $106,350 $ $106,350 $  $106,350 $ $106,350 $ $106,350 $ 
                          

Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

10. Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (Continued)

        The following table presents offsetting of securities loaned as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


 Gross
Amounts of
Recognized
Liabilities
 Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
 Net Amounts
of Liabilities
Presented in
the
Statement of
Financial
Position
 Financial
Instruments
 Cash
Collateral
Received
 Net Amount  Gross
Amounts of
Recognized
Liabilities
 Gross
Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
 Net Amounts
of Liabilities
Presented in
the
Statement of
Financial
Position
 Financial
Instruments
 Cash
Collateral
Received
 Net Amount 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

June 30, 2013

 $44,532 $ $44,532 $ $44,532 $ 

September 30, 2013

 $41,747 $ $41,747 $ $41,747 $ 
                          

December 31, 2012

 $12,517 $ $12,517 $ $12,517 $  $12,517 $ $12,517 $ $12,517 $ 
                          


11. Fair Value

        Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the "exit price") in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The three broad levels of fair value hierarchy are as follows:


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements JuneSeptember 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

11. Fair Value (Continued)

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

        The following tables summarize the valuation of our financial instruments by pricing observability levels as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:


 June 30, 2013  September 30, 2013 

 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 

 (in thousands)
  (in thousands)
 

Money markets

 $275,458 $ $ $275,458  $277,072 $ $ $277,072 

U.S. Treasury Bills

  824,061  824,061   823,468  823,468 

U.K. Treasury Bills

  117  117   125  125 

Equity securities

  

Growth

 116,486   116,486  94,987   94,987 

Value

 36,356   36,356  46,753   46,753 

Multi-asset and asset allocation

 50,195   50,195  52,603   52,603 

Other(1)

 56,399   56,399  61,469   61,469 

Fixed Income securities

  

Taxable(2)

 146,730 2,968  149,698  149,472 3,150   152,622 

Tax-exempt(3)

 5,227 795  6,022  3,694 836   4,530 

Derivatives

 1,619 6,007  7,626  700 3,881  4,581 

Long exchange-traded options

 13,074   13,074  14,315   14,315 

Private equity

 5,229 19,221 61,426 85,876  3,471 20,926 59,796 84,193 
                  

Total assets measured at fair value

 $706,773 $853,169 $61,426 $1,621,368  $704,536 $852,386 $59,796 $1,616,718 
                  

Securities sold not yet purchased

  

Short equities—corporate

 $37,769 $ $ $37,769  $46,596 $ $ $46,596 

Short exchange-traded options

 15,065   15,065  13,086   13,086 

Derivatives

 70 1,208  1,278  354 3,435  3,789 
                  

Total liabilities measured at fair value

 $52,904 $1,208 $ $54,112  $60,036 $3,435 $ $63,471 
                  

Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements JuneSeptember 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

11. Fair Value (Continued)


 
 December 31, 2012 
 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 
 
 (in thousands)
 

Money markets

 $170,120 $ $ $170,120 

U.S. Treasury Bills

    1,537,150    1,537,150 

U.K. Treasury Bills

    125    125 

Equity securities

             

Growth

  125,242      125,242 

Value

  36,126      36,126 

Multi-asset and asset allocation

  59,449      59,449 

Other(1)

  39,702      39,702 

Fixed Income securities

             

Taxable(2)

  177,635  1,219    178,854 

Tax-exempt(3)

  5,661  797    6,458 

Derivatives

  64  2,561    2,625 

Long exchange-traded options

  15,087      15,087 

Private equity

  7,695    76,953  84,648 
          

Total assets measured at fair value

 $636,781 $1,541,852 $76,953 $2,255,586 
          

Securities sold not yet purchased

             

Short equities—corporate

 $54,370 $ $ $54,370 

Short exchange-traded options

  9,197      9,197 

Other

  271      271 

Derivatives

  1,598  5,472    7,070 
          

Total liabilities measured at fair value

 $65,436 $5,472 $ $70,908 
          

(1)
Primarily long positions in corporate equities traded through our options desk.

(2)
Primarily corporate and government securities.

(3)
Primarily municipal bonds.

        Following is a description of the fair value methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy:


Table of Contents


AllianceBernstein L.P. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements September 30, 2013 (Continued)

(unaudited)

11. Fair Value (Continued)