Filedby T-Mobile US, Inc.
pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act of 1933
and deemed filed pursuant toRule 14a-12
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Subject Company: Sprint Corporation
Commission FileNo.: 001-04721
The following content was made available on the NewT-Mobile website:
Former U.S. Rep. Waxman: “TheSprint-T-Mobile Merger Will Benefit Californians”
“As a member of Congress, I always studied proposed mergers with a critical eye. In my 40 years as a U.S. Representative, including my time as chairman of the Energy & Commerce Committee, I worked to protect California consumers. This led me to oppose concentrations of power, especially if such actions would lead to less competition, higher prices, or lower-quality products. But after working with and forT-Mobile and after studying the merits of this transaction, I can say with confidence that theSprint-T-Mobile merger will benefit Californians.”
| • | | Henry A. WaxmanOp-Ed, “We’d Be Better Off WithT-Mobile-Sprint Merger,”CALmatters, 11/12/18 |
TheT-Mobile-Sprint Merger Will Help Close The Technological Divide Currently Present In California: Former President Clinton Advisor
“Our state is long overdue to upend the telecommunications status quo. We are only as strong as our most vulnerable communities, and there are currently far too many Californians on the wrong side of the technological divide. We need to bridge that gap fast, as it is key to the economic growth of our state and the well-being of our residents. A stronger competitor in the wireless marketplace, with the ability to speed up 5G investment, will help make that happen.”
| • | | Maria Echaveste, University of California – Berkeley Professor, “To Bridge California’s Digital Divide, LetT-Mobile And Sprint Merge,”Fresno Bee, 1/14/19 |
Former Massachusetts and Washington Attorneys General SupportT-Mobile-Sprint Merger
“In today’s dynamic market for broadband internet — where the advent of 5G technology promises to transform and expand consumer options — scale is critical to competition. The proposed merger ofT-Mobile and Sprint is a case in point. The reason why we support this merger — and, in fact, why we joined theT-Mobile advisory team — is that it will create substantial consumer benefits by giving the combined company the spectrum, assets and scale to more effectively challenge larger players.”
- Martha Coakley & Rob McKennaOp-Ed,“T-Mobile-Sprint Is A Different Merger For A Different Era,”The Hill, 1/15/19
Talk More Wireless CEO: NewT-Mobile Will Bring Affordable 5G to Americans Everywhere
“With plans to invest nearly $40 billion within the first three years of the merger and bring a nationwide 5G network sooner than otherwise possible, the NewT-Mobile will push AT&T and Verizon to do the same. As the NewT-Mobile develops a nationwide 5G footprint on a faster timetable, dealers like Talk More Wireless will be there to help rural and cost-conscious Americans reap the benefits.T-Mobile’s record of bringing mobile broadband to underserved Americans speaks for itself, and I can’t wait to see the great things thatT-Mobile and Sprint can do together.”
| • | | Jimmy Ralph, CEO and Founder, Talk More Wireless, “T-Mobile and Sprint to strengthen prepaid competition and accelerate nationwide 5G,”RCR Wireless, 12/12/18 |
Consumers’ Research Executive Director: Consumers Win withT-Mobile-Sprint Merger
“Together, however,T-Mobile and Sprint would have the requisite size, money, and spectrum licenses to compete with Verizon and AT&T in pushing forward the industry’s technological capabilities. By allowing the two carriers to join forces, the FCC and the DOJ would empower a third, robust competitor to vie with telecommunication’s front-runners. In that race, cellular customers win.”
| • | | Kyle Burgess, Executive Director, Consumers’ Research, “Let ‘Em Merge! Why Regulators Should ApproveT-Mobile-Sprint Merger,”Investor’s Business Daily, 9/28/18 |