UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-K
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
Or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 33-0680443
PANACEA GLOBAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada | | | | 33-0680443 |
(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) | | | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
330 Highway #7 East, Suite 502, Richmond Hill
Ontario, Canada L4B 3P8
(Address of principal executive offices)
Tel. No.: (416) 450-6414
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes o Nox
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12-months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes S No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | | Accelerated filer £ |
Non-Accelerated filer o | | Smaller reporting company S |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o No x
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. $10,909,076
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes o No o
As of March 27, 2012, there were 94,063,586 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I | | 2 |
| | |
ITEM 1. | DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS | 2 |
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS | 3 |
ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS | 4 |
ITEM 2. | DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY | 4 |
ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | 4 |
ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES | 4 |
| | |
PART II | | 5 |
| | |
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS | 5 |
ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA | 6 |
ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS | 6 |
ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | 10 |
ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA | 10 |
ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE | 10 |
ITEM 9A | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 10 |
ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION | 11 |
| | |
PART III | | 12 |
| | |
ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE | 12 |
ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 13 |
ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT | 14 |
ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE | 14 |
ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES | 14 |
| | |
PART IV | | 15 |
| | |
ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES | 15 |
| | |
SIGNATURES | 17 |
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”) contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. Because they discuss future events or conditions, forward-looking statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “seek,” “plan,” “might,” “will,” “expect,” “predict,” “project,” “forecast,” “potential,” “continue” negatives thereof or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, are based on various underlying assumptions and current expectations about the future and are not guarantees. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievement to be materially different from the results of operations or plans expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
We cannot predict all of the risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, such information should not be regarded as representations that the results or conditions described in such statements or that our objectives and plans will be achieved and we do not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this Report and include information concerning possible or assumed future results of our operations, including statements about potential acquisition or merger targets; business strategies; future cash flows; financing plans; plans and objectives of management; any other statements regarding future acquisitions, future cash needs, future operations, business plans and future financial results, and any other statements that are not historical facts.
These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Many of those factors are outside of our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than we have described. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning other matters addressed in this Report and attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this Report.
Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, a change in events, conditions, circumstances or assumptions underlying such statements, or otherwise.
CERTAIN TERMS USED IN THIS REPORT
When this report uses the words “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company,” they refer to Panacea Global, Inc. and its subsidiaries. “SEC” refers to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
PART I
Overview
We are a corporation incorporated under the laws of Nevada. On June 30, 2010 we entered into a share exchange agreement with Panacea Global, Inc., a privately held Delaware corporation (“Panacea Delaware”), and the shareholders of Panacea Delaware pursuant to which we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Panacea Delaware from the Panacea Delaware shareholders and Panacea Delaware became our wholly owned subsidiary and our operating business. Through Panacea Delaware, we are a biopharmaceutical company that anticipates selling early detection cancer tests through our licensing agreement with Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Pharmaceuticals”).
On June 2, 2011, we filed a Certificate of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation with the State of Nevada changing the Company’s name to Panacea Global, Inc.
As of December 31, 2011, we are in the development stage and have negative working capital, have not earned any revenues from operations and have accumulated a deficit.
Exchange Agreement
On June 30, 2010, we entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”), by and among Moneylogix Group Inc., a publicly traded Nevada corporation, Panacea Delaware and the shareholders of Panacea Delaware (the “Panacea Shareholders”). The closing of the transaction (the “Closing”) took place on June 30, 2010 (the “Closing Date”). On the Closing Date, pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreement, we acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Panacea Delaware (the “Panacea Shares”) from the Panacea Shareholders, and the Panacea Shareholders transferred and contributed 100% of the Panacea Shares to us. In exchange, we issued to the Panacea Shareholders, their designees or assigns, 74,800,000 shares (the “Exchange Shares”) representing 83.7% of the outstanding shares of our common stock issued and outstanding after the Closing (the “Share Exchange”). Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, Panacea Delaware became our wholly-owned subsidiary.
In addition, pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, Gary Cilevitz and Alex Haditaghi resigned as the directors of the Company and Mahmood Moshiri and Binnay Sethi were appointed as the new directors of the Company upon effectiveness of an information statement required by Rule 14f-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Additionally, Gary Cilevitz and Alex Haditaghi resigned as our officers and Mahmood Moshiri and Binnay Sethi were appointed as our new officers, effective immediately at the Closing.
Licensing Agreement
On March 24, 2010, Panacea Delaware entered into a licensing agreement (the “Licensing Agreement”) with Pharmaceuticals. Pursuant to the Licensing Agreement, Panacea Delaware was granted the exclusive right to develop, use, and market Pharmaceuticals’ HAAH based cancer diagnostic technologies, with rights to sublicense worldwide, except for the United States of America. In consideration for the License Agreement, Panacea Delaware issued 35,500,000 shares of its common stock to Pharmaceuticals and is obligated to pay Pharmaceuticals a license fee of $2,500,000, due within 30 days of the Company raising a minimum $10,000,000 equity investment. One-half of any equity investments raised shall be remitted to Pharmaceuticals, until the license fee is paid in full. The aggregate consideration paid and therefore fair value of the License Agreement equals $50,000,000. Further, the Company will pay Pharmaceuticals 25% of all sublicensing revenue and will purchase all conforming reagent at a cost of $20 per test or 10% of the sale price of the individual test with a minimum $8.00 test price.
On November 18, 2011 we entered into an amendment to the Licensing Agreement whereby the Licensing Agreement was amended to clarify that the license granted to us is exclusive.
We hope to market and sell products through strategic partnerships with companies in different countries by entering into sublicensing agreements to sell our products. We may enter into sublicensing agreements with one or more third parties under all or some of the related Pharmaceuticals patents. Additionally, we hope to develop stand alone operations in certain countries including Canada.
Sublicense Agreement
On November 18, 2011, we entered into an exclusive sublicense agreement by and between Panacea Global, Inc.corporation organized under the laws of Ontario and our wholly owned subsidiary (“Panacea Canada”), Pharmaceuticals, Panacea Global, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and our wholly subsidiary,and Panacea Laboratories, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Ontario (the “Sublicense Agreement.”). Pursuant to the Sublicense Agreement, we granted Panacea Laboratories the exclusive right to sublicense our license to develop, use, and market Pharmaceuticals’ HAAH based cancer diagnostic technologies throughout Canada.
Patents
Pursuant to the Licensing Agreement, we acquired a global diagnostic license (“GDL”) with rights to sublicense our technology worldwide, except for the United States of America. The GDL allows the Company to develop, market and use licensed products related to HAAH based laboratory tests for the following two patents pending:
| · | Methods of Diagnosing, Predicting Therapeutic Efficacy and Screening for New Therapeutic Agents for Leukemia – Pending |
| · | Methods of Diagnosing Lung Cancer – Pending |
Exclusive Master Purchase Agreement with Palmverse Limited
On July 7, 2011, we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Panacea Delaware, entered into an exclusive master purchase agreement with Palmverse Limited, a Belarus corporation (“Palmverse”) (the “Agreement”) to provide Palmverse with the exclusive right to use the Company’s blood, serum and tissue testing services to diagnose and monitor cancer (the “Cancer Testing Products”) within the Republic of Belarus. We have agreed to provide Palmverse with an exclusive right to become the sole purchaser of the Company’s Cancer Testing Products within the Republic of Belarus. The initial term of the Agreement expires on December 31, 2011 (the “Initial Term”). Following the expiration of the Initial Term, the Agreement will renew automatically on an annual basis, provided Palmverse meets minimum purchase amounts, unless either party gives sixty (60) days prior written notice of its intention not to renew the Agreement.
The Agreement provides that Palmverse will be required to meet a minimum purchase amount threshold of the Cancer Testing Products for each year the Agreement is in effect. In that regard, during the Initial Term, Palmverse will be required to purchase a minimum of $280,000 in Cancer Testing Products. Thereafter, in the period ranging from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 (the “First Renewal Term”), Palmverse is required to purchase a minimum of $3,500,000 in Cancer Testing Products. During the period ranging from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 (the “Second Renewal Term”), Palmverse is required to purchase a minimum of $5,250,000 in Cancer Testing Products. Finally, in each renewal term commencing after the Second Renewal Term, Palmverse is required to purchase a minimum of $7,000,000 in Cancer Testing Products.
Palmverse failed to make the minimum purchase amounts during the Initial Term, and is therefore in default of the Agreement. We will not be terminating the Agreement, and we are providing Palmverse the opportunity to cure their default and begin to order the Cancer Testing Products.
Reverse Split
On September 6, 2011, the Board approved resolutions authorizing the Company to implement a reverse stock split of the outstanding shares of common stock at a ratio of up to one-to-thirty (the “Reverse Stock Split”). On September 6, 2011, we also received approval for the Reverse Stock Split from our shareholders. The Board may determine in its discretion whether to effect the Reverse Stock Split at any time, if at all, and if so at what exchange ratio up to one-to-thirty. If the Board determines to effect a Reverse Stock Split, the Reverse Stock Split will become effective upon the filing of a Certificate of Amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada. The exact timing of the filing of the amendment will be determined by the Board based on its evaluation as to when such action will be the most advantageous to us and our stockholders, and the Board. In addition, the Board reserves the right, notwithstanding stockholder approval and without further action by the stockholders, to elect not to proceed with the Reverse Stock Split if, at any time prior to filing the amendment, the Board, in its sole discretion, determines that it is no longer in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders. To date our Board has not yet implemented the Reverse Stock Split.
Employees
As of March 30, 2012, we had 3 employees consisting of our Chief Executive Officer, Vice President and an administrative assistant.
Not applicable since we are a smaller reporting company.
ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS. |
None.
ITEM 2. | DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY. |
As of March 30, 2012, the Company and its subsidiary operate out of a space located at330 Highway #7 East, Suite 502, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada, L4B 3P8. Our telephone number is (416) 450-6414. Our internet website can be found under the domain name ofhttp://www.panaceaglobalinc.com
ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. |
On October 7, 2011, Moneylogix Group, Inc., Maximus Investments, Inc., Bakirkoy Financial Holdings, Inc., Bowen Financial Advisory Group LTD., Marciafor Holdings, Inc., Alex Haditaghi and Gary Cilevitz (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court of Justice in Ontario Canada against the Company, Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maryland and a principal shareholder of the Company, Mahnaz Alikhani, Hossein Ghanbari, Stephen Keith, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Director Mahmood Moshiri, and the Company’s Vice President and Director Binnay Sethi (collectively, the “Defendants”) (the “Lawsuit”). The Plaintiffs’ lawsuit seeks damages relating to an allegation that the operations of the Company have been conducted in a manner that is unfairly prejudicial to the interests of the Plaintiffs. To the best of the Company’s knowledge, the Lawsuit has not yet been served on the various U.S.-based Defendants named therein.
The Lawsuit alleges, among other things, that the Defendants have breached their obligations pursuant to a consulting agreement, as well as to certain verbal agreements, regarding that certain share exchange agreement dated June 30, 2010, as reported in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 8, 2010 (the “Share Exchange Agreement”). Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement, the Company acquired its subsidiary, Panacea Delaware. In addition, the Plaintiffs ask that certain disclosures in the Company’s SEC reports relating to the Share Exchange Agreement, the other transactions contemplated thereby and certain other matters be amended. The Plaintiffs have also sought to have the shares issued to the former shareholders of Panacea Delaware, now the principal and majority shareholders of the Company, be cancelled. They also seek to restrain the Defendants from proceeding with a reverse stock split identified in SEC filings. Furthermore, the Plaintiffs seek to have the Company’s former director and principal executive officer reappointed as a director of the Company and the current officers and directors of the Company resign from their respective positions. The Plaintiffs have also demanded that the Company provide copies of all accounting records and tax returns of the Company and Panacea Delaware from 2009 to the present. In addition, the Plaintiffs have requested that the Company provide certain share certificates to their alleged proper owners. The Plaintiffs have also claimed that they have been unable to dispose of their holdings of the Company’s common stock due to the Company’s alleged refusal to remove the transfer restrictions on the Plaintiffs shares. The Plaintiffs also allege that the Company must issue 5,000,000 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock to Maximus Investments, Inc. In sum, the Plaintiffs seek a total of $24,295,000 in damages (including punitive damages), as well as pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest and costs.
The Company believes the Plaintiffs’ claims against it are entirely without merit. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against and pursue, as applicable, its legal recourses against the Plaintiffs and has retained Canadian counsel in furtherance thereof. As part of these efforts, the Company has signaled its intention to bring a motion to dismiss on the basis of lack of jurisdiction, which is currently set to proceed on August 23, 2012.
ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES. |
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. |
Our common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board, ticker symbol “PANG” The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission, and may not represent actual transactions. The closing price of the common stock on March 27, 2012 was $0.30 per share. The high and low bid prices for trading of our stock for each of the quarters during 2011was as follows:
| | | 1st Quarter | | | 2nd Quarter | | | 3rd Quarter | | | 4th Quarter | |
| 2011: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| High | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 0.43 | | | $ | 0.40 | |
| Low | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 0.25 | | | $ | 0.025 | |
Holders of Capital Stock
As of March 27, 2012 there were approximately 1,061 holders of record of our common stock.
Rule 144 Shares
As of the date of this annual report on Form 10-K, we do not have any shares of our common stock that are currently available for sale to the public in accordance with the volume and trading limitations of Rule 144.
Dividends
To date, we have paid no dividends on our shares of common stock and have no present intention of paying any dividends on our shares of common stock in the foreseeable future. The payment by us of dividends on the shares of common stock in the future, if any, rests solely within the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon, among other things, our earnings, capital requirements and financial condition, as well as other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Although dividends are not limited currently by any agreements, it is anticipated that future agreements, if any, with institutional lenders or others may limit our ability to pay dividends on our shares of common stock.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plan
As of December 31, 2011, we had one compensation plan in place, entitled “Panacea Global, Inc.’s 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan.” The Panacea Global, Inc.’s 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan was approved by our Board on July 26, 2011.
Plan | | Total number of securities authorized | | | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options as at December 31, 2011 | | | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options as at January 31, 2011 | | | Number of securities remaining available for further issuance as at December 31, 2011 | |
2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan | | | 10,000,000 | | | | 4,500,000 | | | $ | 0.55 | | | | 5,500,000 | |
On July 26, 2011 the Board approved the issuance of non-qualified stock options (the “Options”) to each of: Mahmood Moshiri (“Moshiri”), the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Medical Officer and Director, and Binnay Sethi, the Company’s Vice President and Director, for each to purchase 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Options were granted pursuant to, and are subject to, the Company’s 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan which was approved by the Board on July 26, 2011.The Options vest and become exercisable on January 26, 2012 at an exercise price of $0.55 per share and expire on July 26, 2021.
ITEM 6. | selected financial data. |
Not applicable as a smaller reporting company.
ITEM 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
The information contained in this section has been derived from our financial statements and should be read together with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Panacea Global, Inc. is a corporation incorporated under the laws of Nevada. On June 30, 2010 Panacea Global, Inc. entered into a share exchange agreement with Panacea Global, Inc., a privately held Delaware corporation (“Panacea Delaware”), and the shareholders of Panacea Delaware pursuant to which we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Panacea Delaware from the Panacea Delaware shareholders and Panacea Delaware became our wholly owned subsidiary and our operating business.
Through Panacea Delaware, we are a company that sells early detection cancer tests through our licensing agreement with Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Pharmaceuticals”). More specifically, Panacea Global Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company focused on providing blood (protein), serum and tissue tests to diagnose and monitor cancer through a licensing agreement with Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The Company’s mission is to discover, develop and commercialize innovative diagnostic products. Panacea’s current product development focus is on novel proteins and biochemical pathways related to cellular regulation and cell cycle abnormalities in oncology diseases.
Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. was founded in 1999 to discover, develop and commercialize innovative therapeutic and diagnostic products for cancer and diseases of the central nervous system. In-house research and development activities are performed at an 11,000 square foot facility in Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Panacea Laboratories, Inc. is certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) to perform high complexity testing, and offers several cancer diagnostic tests to patients, physicians and clinical laboratories.
On March 24, 2010, Panacea Delaware entered into a licensing agreement (the “Licensing Agreement”) with Pharmaceuticals. Pursuant to the Licensing Agreement, Panacea Delaware was granted the exclusive right to develop, use, and market Pharmaceuticals’ HAAH based cancer diagnostic technologies, with rights to sublicense worldwide, except for the United States of America. Panacea Global continues to market and sell products through strategic partnerships with companies in different countries by entering into sublicensing agreements to sell our products. We anticipate that our licensing agreements, with amenable profits margins, will underpin our revenue for the 2012 year.
On November 18, 2011 we entered into an amendment to the Licensing Agreement whereby the Licensing Agreement was amended to clarify that the license granted to us is exclusive.
On June 2, 2011, we filed a Certificate of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation with the State of Nevada changing the Company’s name to Panacea Global, Inc.
As of December 31, 2011, we are in the development stage and have limited working capital, have not earned any revenues from operations and have accumulated a deficit.
Exclusive Master Purchase Agreement with Palmverse Limited (Belarus)
On July 7, 2011, we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, Panacea Delaware, entered into an exclusive master purchase agreement with Palmverse Limited, a Belarus corporation (“Palmverse”) (the “Agreement”) to provide Palmverse with the exclusive right to use the Company’s blood, serum and tissue testing services to diagnose and monitor cancer (the “Cancer Testing Products”) within the Republic of Belarus. We have agreed to provide Palmverse with an exclusive right to become the sole purchaser of the Company’s Cancer Testing Products within the Republic of Belarus.
Palmverse failed to make the minimum purchase amounts during the Initial Term, and is therefore in default of the Agreement. We will not be terminating the Agreement, and we are providing Palmverse the opportunity to cure their default and begin to order the Cancer Testing Products.
Exclusive Sublicense Agreement with Panacea Laboratories (Canada)
On November 18, 2011, we entered into an exclusive sublicense agreement by and between Panacea Global, Inc., acorporation organized under the laws of Ontario and our wholly owned subsidiary (“Panacea Canada”), Pharmaceuticals, Panacea Global, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware and our wholly subsidiary,and Panacea Laboratories, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Ontario (the “Sublicense Agreement”). Pursuant to the Sublicense Agreement, we granted Panacea Laboratories the exclusive right to sublicense our license to develop, use, and market Pharmaceuticals’ HAAH based cancer diagnostic technologies throughout Canada.
2012 Objectives
Our primary goal is to attempt to sell our diagnostic screening products for the early detection of pre-cancer and cancer. Our HAAH-based early cancer detection blood testing services can be used to assist physicians in detecting the following types of cancer: Breast Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Lung Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Chronic and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML & CML)
Panacea Global will provide blood and serum tests to diagnose and monitor cancer. Our strategic roadmap to achieve this goal includes the utilization of the following key tests:
| 1. | BC Detect® - An in vitro serum test to help to detect and identify recurrence of breast cancer |
| 2. | CC Detect® - An in vitro serum test to help to detect and identify recurrence of colorectal cancer |
| 3. | LC Detect® - An in vitro serum test to help to detect and identify recurrence of lung cancer |
| 4. | PC Detect® - An in vitro serum test to help to detect and identify recurrence of prostate cancer |
| 5. | TK Sense® - A RT-PCR (gene expression) test that predicts the response of patients with chronic Myelogenous leukemia (CML) to the drug imatinib. |
2012 Priorities
In 2012 we will devote significant time and resources on our two-fold growth strategy which is both an international and domestic strategy.
International Growth Strategy:
Our international growth strategy consists of marketing and selling its products through strategic partnerships with companies around the world. This is accomplished by our entering into sublicensing agreements with various companies, giving those companies the rights to sell diagnostic tests relevant to our patents. In return, we will receive an upfront fee and royalty streams from the strategic partners. Specifically, we are endeavoring to create strategic partnerships with companies in Canada, Belarus, Near East Region, India, China, Korea, Ireland, Romania, and Japan, as well as Europe, Africa and the Middle East. In order to be considered, strategic partners must demonstrate relevant expertise and a proven track record. We hope to develop strategic partnerships with approximately ten partners in at least ten countries per year.
Canadian Growth Strategy:
In conjunction with their international growth strategy, our Canadian growth strategy will focus on developing the Canadian market as a stand-alone operation (Panacea Laboratories Inc.). This will be accomplished through obtaining approval and subsequently distributing the product. We expect Canadian revenues to be generated by the end of 2012. Clinical diagnostic testing laboratories will initially be established in Toronto and subsequently in other provinces.
Updated Valuation Analysis of Global Diagnostic License
As of December 31, 2011, we requested that an updated valuation analysis regarding our Global Diagnostic License (the “License”) be performed to subsequently replace the dated December 31, 2007, and filed with our Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2010. Reznick Group performed a valuation analysis to estimate the fair value of our License as of December 31, 2011 (the “Valuation Date”).
According to the License Agreement, Panacea Pharmaceuticals granted us the global right (excluding the United States and its territories and protectorates) with respect to the development, use, and marketing of the technology, method, process, patent rights, and know-how related to the cancer testing products. Based on the update valuation analysis, the fair market value of the License was determined to be $55.8 million as of the Valuation Date.
Financial Overview
Revenue
We expect product royalty fees and license fees to underpin our gross revenue for the full year 2012 as opposed to the amounts recorded in 2011. We hope to recognize these revenue streams from our agreements with Palmverse and Panacea Canada, as well as other potential customers we hope to enter into agreements with during 2012. However, to date Palmverse has not purchased any of our products, in violation of our agreement, and there is no guarantee that we will succeed in entering into any additional agreements.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
As of December 31, 2011, the Company has begun limited business operations in connection with the Licensing Agreement. However, we have not had any revenues during the year ended December 31, 2011 or during the period from February 5, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2011.
Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2011 were $1,983,656, as compared to total expenses of $105,702 for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase in total expenses during fiscal 2011 was primarily attributable to an increase in stock based compensation of $1,124,367 in connection with the Options granted to our executive officers in fiscal 2011. In addition, general expenses of $423,514 for the year ended December 31, 2011, and salary and benefit expenses of $216,633 for the year ended December 31, 2011, were not present during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 or the period from February 5, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010. Since inception, the Company has incurred total expenses of $2,089,358.
The Company recorded a net loss of $2,067,896 for the year ended December 31, 2011. We recorded a net loss of $105,702 for the period from February 5, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010. Since inception, the Company has incurred a net loss of $2,173,598.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At December 31, 2011 the Company had $328,662 cash in hand and $51,345,464 in assets comprised of the $50,000,000 License Agreement, an investment in Panacea Laboratories, Inc. of $915,760, capital assets totaling $49,624 and prepaid expenses and deposits of $51,418. Based on our current capital needs, we expect that our current funds will fund our operations for up to approximately four to six months. The License Agreement allows us to develop market and use licensed products related to HAAH based laboratory tests. Comparatively, at December 31, 2010, we had no cash and $50,000,000 in License Agreement.
At December 31, 2011 we had liabilities of $3,559,042 comprised of a balance due to related party of $649,609, the license fee payable of $1,762,500, deferred revenues from Panacea Laboratories, Inc. of $1,000,000, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities totaling $146,933. Comparatively at December 31, 2010, we had $2,566,402 in liabilities comprised of the license fee payable of $2,500,000 and accounts payable and accrued liabilities totaling $66,402.
Net cash used in operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2011 was $648,527. Net cash used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2011 was $968,773 due to the Company’s investment in Panacea Laboratories, Inc. and purchases of capital assets. Net cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2011 was $1,949,609 due to the sale of shares of our common stock and advances from a related party. There were no net cash inflows or outflows from operating, investing and/or financing activities during the period from February 5, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010.
As there were no revenues from operating activities as of December 31, 2011, we must rely upon the issuance of common stock and additional capital contributions from shareholders and/or loans from shareholders and third-party lenders to meet our working capital needs. It is expected by management that we will need to rely upon new capital contributions to pay our liabilities.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased to $423,514 for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to nil for the period from February 5, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010. This increase in general and administrative expenses includes increases of $131,611 in consulting fees, and $291,903 in office related expenses.
Professional Fees and Marketing Expenses
Professional Fees and marketing expenses increased to $205,427 for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $66,402 for the period from February 5, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010. This increase was primarily due to the increase in the cost of professional services.
Interest Income
There was no interest income for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Interest Expense
There was no interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Other Income
The Company had a loss on its investment in Panacea Laboratories, Inc. of $84,240 for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to nil for the period from February 5, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010. Panacea Laboratories, Inc. is still in development and the Company’s loss on investment represents its share of consulting, legal, accounting and other expenses incurred by Panacea Laboratories, Inc.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our financial statements and related public financial information are based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). GAAP requires the use of estimate; assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, and revenue and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our external disclosures including information regarding contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe our use of estimates and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to GAAP and are consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant estimates made during the preparation of our financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Changes to GAAP accounting are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the form of accounting standards updates (“ASU’s”) to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification.
The Company has assessed the applicability and impact of all ASU’S and they have been determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Going Concern
These financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue on a going-concern basis. The Company has incurred losses since inception and the ability of the Company to continue as a going-concern depends upon its ability to develop profitable operations and to continue to raise adequate financing. Accumulated Losses from inception to December 31, 2011 total $2,173,598. Management is actively targeting sources of additional financing to provide continuation of the Company’s operations. In order for the Company to meet its liabilities as they come due and to continue its operations, the Company is solely dependent upon its ability to generate such financing.
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to raise funds, in which case the Company may be unable to meet its obligations. Should the Company be unable to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business, the net realizable value of its assets may be materially less than the amounts recorded in these financial statements.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue in existence.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
In accordance with ASC 360-10-05, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets , long-lived assets to be held and used are analyzed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The Company evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate possible impairment. If there are indications of impairment, the Company uses future undiscounted cash flows of the related asset or asset grouping over the remaining life in measuring whether the assets are recoverable. In the event such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the recorded asset values, the assets are written down to their estimated fair value. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value of asset less cost to sell. The Company continues to evaluate the Global Diagnostic License for events or changes in circumstances that would be indicative of impairment however no such indication has developed since it was acquired on March 24, 2010.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2011, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements.
ITEM 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
Not applicable as a smaller reporting company.
ITEM 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. |
The financial statements of the Company appear at the end of this report beginning with the Index to Financial Statements on page F-1.
ITEM 9. | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. |
None.
ITEM 9a. | controls and procedures. |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of December 31, 2011. This evaluation was accomplished under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer/principal executive officer who concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective to ensure that all material information required to be filed in the Form 10-K has been made known to them.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(1) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
For purposes of this section, the term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act (15 U.S.C. 78a et seg.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure, controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”) is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In connection with our management’s assessment of our internal control over financial reporting as required under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we identified certain material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011:
| ● | Reliance upon independent financial reporting consultants for review of critical accounting areas and disclosures and material non-standard transaction. |
| ● | Lack of sufficient accounting staff which results in a lack of segregation of duties necessary for a good system of internal control. |
Because of the material weaknesses above, management has concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on Internal Control over Financial Reporting – Guidance for Smaller Public Companies issued by COSO.
Remediation of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In order to remedy our existing internal control deficiencies, as our finances allow, we will hire a Chief Financial Officer and additional accounting staff.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
We have not yet made any changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report on Form 10-K that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. | other information. |
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. |
The following table sets forth, as of March 30, 2012 the name and age of our directors and executive officers. The directors will hold such office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his successors has been elected and qualified.
Name | | Age | | | Position |
| | | | | |
Moshiri Mahmood | | | 55 | | | Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Medical Officer and Director |
| | | | | | |
Binnay Sethi | | | 44 | | | Vice President and Director |
Business Experience
The following summarizes the occupation and business experience of our Board of Directors and Corporate Officers:
Moshiri Mahmood, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Medical Officer and Director
Since 1990, Mahmood Moshiri has been on the faculty at several medical universities including Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Yazd University of Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, and Rajaei Cardiovascular Research Center, Tehran, Iran. Mr. Moshiri has extensive experience in teaching and practicing medicine and performing clinical researches focusing on preventive medicine, nutrition and cancer pathology, and cardiovascular health. He has published extensively on the subject of pathology in preventive and therapeutic disciplines during the last 20 years. Mr. Moshiri has hosted numerous newscasts in the health and preventive fields for Iranian National TV in Iran. In addition to his media expertise, his articles have been published in many American, European, and Asian medical journals. He has been a contributing author of medical books published in North America including Antioxidant in Human Health and Diseases, Canada, 1998 and Frontiers in Cardiovascular Health, Boston, USA. Mr. Moshiri has been an Organizing Member, and International Advisory Board Member and Speaker in many World Congresses on Clinical Nutrition and Medicine including the World Congress on Clinical Nutrition in China 1995, Iran 1996, Canada, Banff 1997, India 1999, Iran 1999, Mexico 1998, Canada, Alberta University 2007. Mr. Mahmood graduated from Esfahan Medical School in 1978, obtained his MD from Iran University of Medical Sciences, and received his degree in Clinical and Anatomical Pathology from Beheshti School of Medicine in Tehran, Iran.
From 1997 to 2007, Mr. Moshiri served as Vice President of the International College of Nutrition; and has won two Medical World Congress Awards (1997 Banff, Canada, and 2007 Alberta University, Canada). He is the President of Proteus Imaging Canada.
Binnay Sethi, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director
Binnay Sethi is currently the CEO of Binalli Vision, one of the largest building maintenance companies in Canada. Binalli Vision has over 500 clients and employs over 400 people. He founded the company in 1995 and has grown the organization from inception. He has started and managed numerous companies throughout his career focused in the building maintenance area along with real property administration. Prior to Binalli Vision, Binnay owned multiple Subway franchises around Toronto and sold them in 1995. He has studied Business and International business at Seneca College.
Compliance with Section 16(A) of the Exchange Act
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are required to furnish copies to the Company. To the best of the Company’s knowledge, any reports required to be filed were timely filed in fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to our Directors, Officers and Management.
Directors and Committees
As of December 31, 2011, the Company has only two directors and, as such, has no nominating, audit or other committees of its board of directors. The two directors of the Company would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert.”
As of December 31, 2010 the Company has two non-independent directors as disclosed above. Currently, the board and management are searching for qualified independent board of director members.
ITEM 11. | Executive Compensation. |
Name and Position | | Year | | | Salary | | | Bonus | | | Stock Compensation | | | All Other Compensation | | | Total | |
Mahmood Moshiri (Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Medical Officer and Director) | | | 2010 | | | $ | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | |
| | | 2011 | | | $ | 56,881 | | | | - | | | $ | 499,719 | (1) | | | - | | | $ | 556,600 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Binnay Sethi (Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director) | | | 2010 | | | $ | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | - | |
| | | 2011 | | | $ | 50,032 | | | | - | | | $ | 499,719 | (1) | | | - | | | $ | 549,751 | |
| (1) | Includes stock options issued on July 26, 2011 to purchase 2,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.55. |
Compensation of Directors
Other than our officers who serve as directors and whose compensation is detailed above, no compensation was paid to our directors in 2011.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth for each named executive officer certain information concerning the outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2011.
| Option Awards | Stock Awards |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Equity |
| | | | | | | | | Incentive |
| | | | | | | | | Plan |
| | | | | | | | | Awards : |
| | | | | | | | Equity | Market or |
| | | Equity | | | | | Incentive | Payout |
| | | Incentive | | | | | Plan | Value |
| | | Plan | | | | | Awards : | of |
| | | Awards: | | | | Market | Number of | Unearned |
| Number of | Number of | Number of | | | Numberof | Value | Unearned | Shares, |
| Securities | Securities | Securities | | | Shares or | of Shares | Shares, Units | Units |
| Underlying | Underlying | Underlying | | | Units of | or Units of | or Other | or Other |
| Unexercised | Unexercised | Unexercised | Option | Option | Stock that | Stock | Rights that | Rights that |
| Options | Options | Unearned | Exercise | Expiration | Have Not | that Have | Have Not | Have Not |
Name | Exercisable | Unexercisable | Options | Price | Date | Vested | Not Vested | Vested | Vested |
Mahmood Moshiri | 2,000,000 | - | - | $0.55 | 7/26/2021 | - | - | - | - |
Binnay Sethi | 2,000,000 | - | - | $0.55 | 7/26/2021 | - | - | - | - |
On July 26, 2011 the Board approved the issuance of non-qualified stock options (the “Options”) to each of: Mahmood Moshiri (“Moshiri”), the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Medical Officer and Director, and Binnay Sethi (“Sethi,” and together with Moshiri, the “Optionees”), the Company’s Vice President and Director, for each to purchase 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Options were granted pursuant to, and are subject to, the Company’s 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan which was approved by the Board on July 26, 2011.The Options vest and become exercisable on January 26, 2012 at an exercise price of $0.55 per share and expire on July 26, 2021.
ITEM 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. |
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our shares of common stock beneficially owned as of March 30, 2012, for (i) each stockholder known to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) each named executive officer and director, and (iii) all executive officers and directors as a group. A person is considered to beneficially own any shares: (i) over which such person, directly or indirectly, exercises sole or shared voting or investment power, or (ii) of which such person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days through an exercise of stock options or warrants. Unless otherwise indicated, voting and investment power relating to the shares shown in the table for our directors and executive officers is exercised solely by the beneficial owner or shared by the owner and the owner’s spouse or children.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)(2) | | Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership | | | Percent of Class(1) | |
Bowen Financial Advisory Group(3) STE 205 A- Saffrey Square, P.O. Box N 9934 Nassau | | | 8,100,000 | | | | 8.61 | % |
Majid Haditaghi 47 Ardmore Crescent, Richmond Hill, Ontario Canada L4B-3P6 | | | 8,200,000 | | | | 8.72 | % |
Marciafor Holdings, Inc.(4) STE 205 A- Saffrey Square, P.O. Box N 9934 Nassau | | | 8,000,000 | | | | 8.50 | % |
Moshiri Mahmood(2) 330 Highway #7 East, Suite 502Richmond Hill, Ontario Canada L4B 3P8 | | | 16,800,000 | | | | 17.86 | % |
Masoud Ataei Nia P.O.Box 117839 Dubai, UAE | | | 6,400,000 | | | | 6.80 | % |
Panacea Pharmaceuticals Inc.(5) 209 Perry Parkway, STE 13 Gaithersburg, MD 20877-2143 | | | 35,500,000 | | | | 37.74 | % |
Binnay Sethi(2) 61 Bowan Court Toronto, Ontario Canada M2K 3A7 | | | 3,000,000 | | | | 3.19 | % |
All Executive Officers and Directors as a group (2 persons) | | | 19,800,000(2) | | | | 21.05 | % |
| (1) | As of March 27, 2012 we have 94,063,586 common shares issued and outstanding |
| (2) | Includes stock options issued on July 26, 2011 to purchase 2,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.55. |
| (3) | We are unaware of who the natural person with voting and investment control over these shares. |
| (4) | We are unaware of who the natural person with voting and investment control over these shares. |
| (5) | Hossein A. Ghanbari is the natural person with voting and investment control over these shares. |
| | |
ITEM 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. |
None.
ITEM 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services. |
The following table sets forth the fees billed by our principal independent accountants, EFP Rotenberg, LLP, for each of our last two fiscal years for the categories of services indicated.
| | Years Ended December 31, | |
Category | | 2011 | | | 2010 | |
Audit Fees | | $ | 16,400 | | | $ | 11,750 | |
Audit Related Fees | | | 2,690 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
All Other Fees | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require that before our auditor is engaged by us to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement be:
· | approved by our audit committee; or |
· | entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the audit committee, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service, the audit committee is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the audit committee’s responsibilities to management. |
We do not have an audit committee. Our entire board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors.
The pre-approval process has just been implemented in response to the new rules. Therefore, our board of directors does not have records addressing the percentage of pre-approved audit fees. However, all of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the entire board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.
PART IV
ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES. |
a) Documents filed as part of this Annual Report
1. Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules
3. Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Title of Document |
| |
3.1 | Certificate of Incorporation (1) |
| |
3.2 | By-Laws(1) |
| |
10.1 | Licensing Agreement by and between Panacea Global Inc., and Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(2) |
| |
10.2* | Amendment to Licensing Agreement by and between Panacea Global Inc., and Panacea Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
31.1* | Certification of Mahmood Moshiri pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
32.1* | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
101.INS * | XBRL Instance Document |
| |
101.SCH * | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| |
101.CAL * | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
| |
101.DEF * | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
| |
101.LAB * | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
| |
101.PRE * | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to the Company’s registration statement on Form SB-2 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 21, 1998. |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 8, 2010. |
* | Filed or furnished herewith. |
In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibit 32.1 is being furnished and not filed.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, there unto duly authorized.
| PANACEA GLOBAL, INC. | |
| | | |
| By: | /s/ Mahmood Moshiri | |
| | Chief Executive Officer, President, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Director | |
| | | |
| Dated: March 30, 2012 | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | | Title | | Date |
| | | | |
/s/ Mahmood Moshiri | | Chief Executive Officer, President | | March 30, 2012 |
Mahmood Moshiri | | Interim Chief Financial Officer and Director | | |
/s/ Binnay Sethi | | Vice President and Director | | March 30, 2012 |
Binnay Sethi | | | | |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Panacea Global, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Panacea Global, Inc. as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2011 and for the period since inception (February 5, 2010) through December 31, 2011. Panacea Global, Inc.’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Panacea Global, Inc. as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2011 and for the period since inception (February 5, 2010) through December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, these conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
/s/ EFP Rotenberg, LLP
EFP Rotenberg, LLP
Rochester, New York
March 30, 2012
Panacea Global, Inc. |
(A Development Stage Company) |
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
| | As at | | | As at | |
| | Saturday, December 31, 2011 | | | Friday, December 31, 2010 | |
| | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
Current | | | | | | | | |
Cash | | $ | 328,662 | | | $ | - | |
Prepaid expenses and deposits | | | 51,418 | | | | - | |
Total Current Assets | | | 380,080 | | | | - | |
Investment(Note 5) | | | 915,760 | | | | - | |
Capital assets(Note 9) | | | 49,624 | | | | - | |
Global diagnostic license(Note 6) | | | 50,000,000 | | | | 50,000,000 | |
Total Non-Current Assets | | | 50,965,384 | | | | 50,000,000 | |
Total Assets | | $ | 51,345,464 | | | $ | 50,000,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | $ | 146,933 | | | $ | 66,402 | |
Due to related party (Note 11) | | | 649,609 | | | | - | |
Deferred revenue(Note 5) | | | 1,000,000 | | | | - | |
License fee payable(Note 5) | | | 1,762,500 | | | | 2,500,000 | |
Total Liabilities | | | 3,559,042 | | | | 2,566,402 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Stockholders' Equity | | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000 shares authorized, | | | - | | | | - | |
none issued(Note 7) | | | | | | | | |
Capital stock, $0.001 par value; 300,000,000 shares authorized; | | | 94,064 | | | | 89,364 | |
94,063,586 issued and outstanding (December 31, 2010 – 89,363,586) | | | | |
(Note 7) | | | | | | | | |
Additional paid in capital | | | 49,869,603 | | | | 47,449,936 | |
Subscription received in advance(Note 7) | | | - | | | | - | |
Deficit accumulated during the development stage | | | (2,173,598 | ) | | | (105,702 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | | (3,647 | ) | | | - | |
Total Stockholders' Equity | | | 47,786,422 | | | | 47,433,598 | |
Total Liabilities and Equity | | $ | 51,345,464 | | | $ | 50,000,000 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
Panacea Global, Inc. |
(A Development Stage Company) |
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 | | | For the Period Ended February 5, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 | | | For the Period Ended February 5, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2011 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Revenue | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Professional fees | | | 205,427 | | | | 66,402 | | | | 271,829 | |
Cost of reorganization | | | - | | | | 39,300 | | | | 39,300 | |
Filing fees | | | 10,326 | | | | - | | | | 10,326 | |
Office and general | | | 423,514 | | | | - | | | | 423,514 | |
Depreciation | | | 3,389 | | | | - | | | | 3,389 | |
Stock based compensation(Note 10) | | | 1,124,367 | | | | - | | | | 1,124,367 | |
Salaries and benefits | | | 216,633 | | | | - | | | | 216,633 | |
Total expenses | | | 1,983,656 | | | | 105,702 | | | | 2,089,358 | |
Loss on investment (Note 5) | | | (84,240 | ) | | | - | | | | (84,240 | ) |
Net loss | | $ | (2,067,896 | ) | | $ | (105,702 | ) | | $ | (2,173,598 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign currency adjustment | | | (3,647 | ) | | | - | | | | (3,647 | ) |
Comprehensive loss | | $ | (2,071,543 | ) | | $ | (105,702 | ) | | $ | (2,177,245 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss per share - basic and diluted | | | (0.02 | ) | | | (0.00 | ) | | | (0.03 | ) |
Weighted number of shares outstanding - basic and diluted | | | 93,411,257 | | | | 64,960,303 | | | | 79,715,120 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
Panacea Global, Inc. |
(A Development Stage Company) |
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Other | | | Accumulated Deficit | | | Total | |
| | Common | | | Stock | | | Additional Paid | | | Comprehensive | | | During the | | | Stockholders' | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | in Capital | | | Income(Loss) | | | Development Stage | | | Equity | |
Balance, February 5, 2010 (inception) | | | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issuance of common stock for services | | | 39,300,000 | | | | 39,300 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 39,300 | |
Issuance of common stock for license | | | 35,500,000 | | | | 35,500 | | | | 47,464,500 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 47,500,000 | |
Reverse merger with MoneyLogix | | | 14,563,586 | | | | 14,564 | | | | (14,564 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Net loss | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (105,702 | ) | | | (105,702 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2010 | | | 89,363,586 | | | $ | 89,364 | | | $ | 47,449,936 | | | $ | - | | | $ | (105,702 | ) | | $ | 47,433,598 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Issuance of common stock for cash | | | 4,700,000 | | | | 4,700 | | | | 1,295,300 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,300,000 | |
Foreign currency exchange adjustment | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (3,647 | ) | | | - | | | | (3,647 | ) |
Stock based compensation | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1,124,367 | | | | - | | | | | | | | 1,124,367 | |
Net loss | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (2,067,896 | ) | | | (2,067,896 | ) |
Balance, December 31, 2011 | | | 94,063,586 | | | $ | 94,064 | | | $ | 49,869,603 | | | $ | (3,647 | ) | | $ | (2,173,598 | ) | | $ | 47,786,422 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
Panacea Global, Inc. |
(A Development Stage Company) |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
| | For the Year Ended January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 | | | For the Period Ended February 5, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2010 | | | | For the Period Ended February 5, 2010 (inception) to December 31, 2011 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | (2,067,896 | ) | | (105,702 | ) | | | (2,173,598 | ) |
Add: Non-cash items - | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation | | 3,389 | | | - | | | | 3,389 | |
Stock based compensation | | 1,124,367 | | | - | | | | 1,124,367 | |
| | (940,140 | ) | | (105,702 | ) | | | (1,045,842 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss cash used in operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Stock issued for services | | - | | | 39,300 | | | | 39,300 | |
Prepaid expenses and deposits | | (51,418 | ) | | - | | | | (51,418 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | 80,531 | | | 66,402 | | | | 146,933 | |
Deferred revenue | | 1,000,000 | | | - | | | | 1,000,000 | |
License fee payable(Note 5) | | (737,500 | ) | | - | | | | (737,500 | ) |
Net cash used in operating activities | | (648,527 | ) | | - | | | | (648,527 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment(Note 5) | | (1,000,000 | ) | | - | | | | (1,000,000 | ) |
Loss on Investment(Note 5) | | 84,240 | | | - | | | | 84,240 | |
Purchases of capital assets | | (53,013 | ) | | - | | | | (53,013 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (968,773 | ) | | - | | | | (968,773 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from Financing Activities | | - | | | | |
Issuance of common stock | | 1,300,000 | | | - | | | | 1,300,000 | |
Advance from related party | | 649,609 | | | - | | | | 649,609 | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | 1,949,609 | | | - | | | | 1,949,609 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Effect of exchange rate on cash | | (3,647 | ) | | - | | | | (3,647 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net change in cash | | 328,662 | | | - | | | | 328,662 | |
Cash, beginning of period | | - | | | - | | | | - | |
Cash, end of period | | $328,662 | | $ | - | | | $ | 328,662 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
PANACEA GLOBAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011
1. | NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND ORGANIZATION |
Nature of Operations
MoneyLogix Group, Inc. ("MoneyLogix" or the “Company”), (formerly Homelife, Inc.), which registered a change of name with the State of Nevada on January 29, 2008 was formerly known as Homelife, Inc. and is organized under the laws of the State of Nevada.
MoneyLogix Group, Inc. entered into a share exchange agreement which closed on June 30, 2010 with Panacea Global, Inc. (“Panacea”), a Delaware private corporation incorporated on February 5, 2010. The reverse merger transaction effected a change of control of the Company. The accounting acquirer is Panacea and the historical operations of the Company are the operations of Panacea. Pursuant to the terms of the share exchange agreement, the parties agreed to the following:
| 1. | MoneyLogix agreed to issue 74,800,000 shares of its common stock to the stockholders of Panacea Global, Inc. in exchange for 100% of Panacea issued and outstanding stock making Panacea a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company on June 30, 2010. |
| | |
The Company is a development stage company that has currently acquired the global rights except for the United States of America for early detection cancer tests. Panacea is a 100% wholly owned subsidiary of MoneyLogix.
Effective June 2, 2011, MoneyLogix Group, Inc. registered a change of name with the State of Nevada to Panacea
Global, Inc. Effective June 15, 2011, the trading symbol for the Company on the OTC Bulletin Board changed from "MLXG" to “PANG”.
The Company has not earned any revenues from limited principal operations and accordingly, the Company's activities have been accounted for as those of a "Development Stage Enterprise" as set forth in ASC 915 Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises. Among the disclosures required by ASC 915 are that the Company's financial statements be identified as those of a development stage company, and that the statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows disclose activity since the date of the Company's inception.
These financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue on a going-concern basis. The Company has incurred losses since inception and the ability of the Company to continue as a going-concern depends upon its ability to develop profitable operations and to continue to raise adequate financing. Accumulated net losses from inception to December 31, 2011 totaled $2,173,598. In order for the Company to meet its liabilities as they come due and to continue its operations, the Company is solely dependent upon its ability to generate such financing.
4. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
The accounting policies of the Company are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Presented below are those policies considered particularly significant:
Basis of Consolidation and Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, and its wholly-owned subsidiary Panacea (a Delaware incorporated Company) and Panacea Global Inc. (a Canadian incorporated Company). All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.
PANACEA GLOBAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011
4. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
Basis of Consolidation and Presentation (continued)
The consolidated financial statements of the Company included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in conjunction with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual audited financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K.
The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for these periods are not necessarily comparable to, or indicative of, results of any other interim period or for the fiscal year taken as a whole. Certain information that is not required for interim financial reporting purposes has been omitted.
Translation of Foreign Currency Financial Statements and Foreign Currency Transactions
The financial statements of the Company’s international subsidiary have been translated into United States dollars by translating balance sheet accounts at year end and period end exchange rates except for non-current assets which are translated at historical exchange rates, and statement of operations accounts at average exchange rates for the periods. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are reflected in the equity section of the Company’s consolidated balance sheet in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The balance of the foreign currency translation adjustment, included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), was ($3,647) for the year ended December 31, 2011. For the period from inception (February 5, 2010) through December 31, 2010 there was no foreign currency translation adjustment recorded due to the limited nature of operations during this period.
Earnings or Loss Per Share
The Company accounts for earnings per share pursuant to ASC 260-10-05, Earnings per Share, which requires disclosure on the financial statements of "basic" and "diluted" earnings (loss) per share. Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common stock outstanding plus common stock equivalents (if dilutive) related to stock options and warrants for each period.
Financial Instruments
In accordance with ASC 825-10-50, Defining Fair Value Measurement, the estimated fair value of financial instruments has been determined by the Company using available market information and valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required in estimating fair value. Accordingly, the estimates may not be indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange. As of December 31, 2011, the carrying value of accrued liabilities, and license fee payable approximate their fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.
PANACEA GLOBAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011
4. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
Financial Instruments (continued)
In accordance with ASC 820-10, Defining Fair Value Measurement, the Company adopted the standard which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to ASC 740-10,Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for differences between the financial statements and tax basis of the assets and liabilities as well as loss carryforward that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is recorded for the amount of income tax payable or refundable for the period increased or decreased by the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the period.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
In accordance with ASC 360-10-05,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, long-lived assets to be held and used are analyzed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The Company evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate possible impairment. If there are indications of impairment, the Company uses future undiscounted cash flows of the related asset or asset grouping over the remaining life in measuring whether the assets are recoverable. In the event such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the recorded asset values, the assets are written down to their estimated fair value. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value of asset less cost to sell. The Company evaluated the Global Diagnostic License on December 31, 2011 and noted no impairment.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. These estimates are reviewed periodically, and, as adjustments become necessary, they are reported in earnings in the period in which they become known. The accounting estimates that require management’s most significant judgments are the valuation of the Global Diagnostics license and measurement of accrued liabilities.
Capital Assets
Capital assets are initially recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided using the declining balance method at rates intended to amortize the cost of assets over their estimated useful lives.
| Method | Rate |
Computer equipment | declining balance | 30% |
Leasehold improvements | declining balance | 20% |
In the year of acquisition, depreciation is taken as assets are available for use.
PANACEA GLOBAL, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011
4. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
Equity Compensation
The company adopted ASC 718,Share-Based Payment, which establishes standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services. This standard focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions, including issuance of stock options to employees. The Company measures stock-based compensation cost at grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award, and recognizes the cost as expense on a straight-line basis (net of estimated forfeitures) over the employee requisite service period. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using a Black-Scholes valuation model.
Investment in Equity Intstruments
The Company has accounted for its investment in equity and debt securities using the equity method of accounting based on the guidelines established in FASB ASC 323. In applying the guidance of FASB ASC 323, the Company recognizes the investment in stock of an investee as as asset. The asset is recorded initially at cost in accordance with the guidance in FASB ASC 805-50-30. Subsequent to the initial recording the Company will recognize its share of the earnings or losses of an investee in the periods for which they are reported by the investee in its financial statements. The Company adjusts the carrying value of the investment for its share of the earnings or losses of the investee after the date of investment and shall report the recognized earnings or losses in the statement of operations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Changes to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) are established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the form of accounting standards updates (ASU’s) to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification.
The Company has assessed the applicability and impact of all ASU’S and they have been determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
5. | GLOBAL DIAGNOSTIC LICENSE |
License Agreement
On March 24, 2010, the Company entered into a license agreement with Panacea Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Pharmaceuticals”) to acquire the global diagnostic license (“GDL”), with rights to sublicense worldwide, except for the United States of America. GDL allows the Company to develop, market and use licensed products related to HAAH based laboratory tests.
In consideration for the GDL, the Company issued 35,500,000 common shares and will pay Pharmaceuticals a license fee of $2,500,000, due within 30 days of the Company raising a minimum $10,000,000 equity investment. One-half of any equity investments raised shall be remitted to Pharmaceuticals, until the license fee is paid in full. The aggregate consideration paid and therefore fair value of the GDL equates $50,000,000. Further, the Company will pay Pharmaceuticals 25% of all sublicensing revenue and will purchase all conforming reagent at a cost of $20 per test or 10% of the sale price of the individual test with a minimum $8.00 test price.
On March 24, 2010, the license agreement date, management re-evaluated the assumptions used in the original valuation conducted by a third party valuation firm and updated the projection based on current circumstance and the Company’s business plan. As at December 31, 2011, the Company engaged a third party professional valuation firm to review the license agreement and determine an appropriate representation of fair value of the intangible asset. The valuation report, which considered current conditions of the Company and industry as well as projections of future performance based on management’s judgment of the likelihood of future outcomes. Results of the valuation report indicated that the intangible asset was not impaired as of December 31, 2011.
As at December 31, 2011 the Company has made license fee payments to Pharmaceuticals of $737,500.
| PANACEA GLOBAL, INC. (A Development Stage Company) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2011 |
| |
5. | GLOBAL DIAGNOSTIC LICENSE (continued) |
Sublicense Agreement
On November 18, 2011, the Company entered into a sublicense agreement with Panacea Laboratories, Inc. (“Laboratories”) to sublicense the rights to develop, market and use licensed products related to HAAH based laboratory tests in Canada.
In consideration for the rights received under the sublicense agreement, Laboratories provided the Company with 40,000,000 shares of its common stock and will pay the Company a sublicense fee of $960,000, due within 3 years. The fair value of the aggregate consideration paid and therefore the initial cost of the investment equated to $1,000,000, which was recognized as the initial asset balance of the investment. Further, Laboratories must purchase all conforming reagents from the Company at a cost of $20 per test or 10% of the sale price of the individual test with a minimum $8.00 test price.
Sublicensing revenues of $1,000,000 has been recorded in deferred revenues as at December 31, 2011 and will be taken into revenues once Laboratories commences operations. Upon the recognition of revenue, the Company will recognize it’s liability to reimburse Panacea Pharmaceuticals 25% of all sublicensing revenue as disclosed above in under the terms of the license agreement.
Based on the accounting uidance of FASB ASC 323, the Company’s investment in Laboratories was subsequently decreased due to the Company’s share of the investors losses experience in operations for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company’s investment of 40,000,000 common shares represents a 50% ownership interest in Laboratories. Laboratories intends to raise capital in the next year through issuing additional shares and the Company’s ownership interest in the Company is expected to decline next year. The Company has significant influence over Laboratories but does not have the level of control that would require consolidation and has thus accounted for its investment in Laboratories using the equity method. During the year ended December 31, 2011, Laboratories incurred consulting, legal and other expenses of $168,480 ($84,240 at the Company’s 50% ownership level) resulting in an ending investment value at December 31, 2011 of $915,760.
The Company’s intangible asset consists of the GDL, as described in Note 5, which contains certain issued and pending patent rights. Upon commencement of licensed services to customers, amortization will be taken over the estimated useful life of the respective patent rights, which vary and are determined on a country-by-country basis.
| As at February 5, 2010 (inception) | Acquired | Accumulated Amortization | As at December 31, 2010 | Accumulated Amortization | As at December 31, 2011 |
Global Diagnostic License | - | $ 50,000,000 | - | $50,000,000 | - | $ 50,000,000 |
As at December 31, 2011, the Company has not commenced any services relating to GDL, and as a result, no amortization has been recorded.
| PANACEA GLOBAL, INC. (A Development Stage Company) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2011 |
a) Authorized
100,000 Class A Preferred shares with a par value of $0.001. There were no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011.
300,000,000 Common shares of $0.001 par value.
b) Issued
94,063,586 Common Shares
Monetary Transactions
Units issued under Subscription Agreements entered into between January 1, 2011 and April 15, 2011 include (i) one share of the Company’s common stock and (ii) one warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at an initial exercise price of $0.25 per share.
On February 16, 2011, 2,000,000 units were issued by the Company for $0.25 per unit generating $500,000 in equity financing.
On February 25,, 2011, an agreement was entered into in which 100,000 units were issued by the Company for $0.25 per unit generating $25,000 in equity financing. Actual issuance of these units occurred on September 2, 2011.
On April 10, 2011, 2,000,000 units were issued by the Company for $0.25 per unit generating $500,000 in equity financing.
On April 15, 2011, 600,000 units were issued by the Company for $0.25 per unit generating $150,000 in equity financing. Subsequently, 500,000 of these units have been rescinded for $125,000.
On April 16, 2011, 500,000 shares were issued by the Company for $0.50 per share generating $250,000 in equity financing.
During the year- ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued 4,700,000 common shares and received $1,300,000 in connection with the above subscriptions received in advance.
Non Monetary Transactions
The following non monetary transactions were completed by the Company on a service for stock basis. It is the Company’s accounting policy that in certain circumstances, stock, generally valued at the 5 day moving average price of the trading value of the stock at the time the associated agreement was executed, might be issued for the procurement of assets, provision of advisory and other services.
7. | PANACEA GLOBAL, INC. (A Development Stage Company) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2011 CAPITAL STOCK (continued) |
Non Monetary Transactions (continued)
On February 5, 2010, the Company issued 22,000,000 common shares at a price of $0.001 per share based on the value of the services provided, for total amount of $22,000 to various suppliers. On June 30, 2010 the Company recorded an additional 17,300,000 common shares at a price of $0.001 per share based on the value of the services provided, for total amount of $17,300 to the same various suppliers.
On March 24, 2010 the Company issued 18,000,000 common shares which translates into a price of $2.63 per share based on the value of the asset transferred for a total amount of $47,500,000 to Panacea Pharmaceuticals. On June 30, 2010 the company recorded an additional 17,500,000 common shares to Panacea Pharmaceuticals at a price of $0.001 per share as an adjustment to the purchase price per share. The adjusted share price after the adjustment of 17,500,000 common shares is $1.33.
The following table provides consolidated information on the Company’s warrants for the year ended December 31, 2011. Each warrant provides the warrant holder the option to purchase one share.
| Number of Warrants | Exercise Price | Exercisable Date | Expiry Date |
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2010 | - | - | - | - |
Granted | 2,000,000 | $0.25 | Anytime | February 16, 2013 |
Granted | 100,000 | $0.25 | Anytime | February 25, 2013 |
Granted | 2,000,000 | $0.25 | Anytime | April 10, 2013 |
Granted | 100,000 | $0.25 | Anytime | April 15, 2013 |
Exercised | - | - | - | - |
Forfeited or lapsed | - | - | - | - |
Warrants outstanding at December 31, 2011 | 4,200,000 | $0.25 | Anytime | None |
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740-20. ASC 740-20 prescribes the use of the liability method whereby deferred tax asset and liability account balances are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates. The effects of future changes in tax laws or rates are not anticipated.
Under ASC 740-20 income taxes are recognized for the following: a) amount of tax payable for the current year, and b) deferred tax liabilities and assets for future tax consequences of events that have been recognized differently in the financial statements than for tax purposes.
The Company has income tax losses available to be applied against future years income as a result of the losses incurred since inception. However, due to the losses incurred since inception and expected future operating results, management determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset resulting from the tax losses available for carry forward will not be realized through the reduction of future income tax payments. Accordingly a 100% valuation allowance has been recorded for income tax losses available for carry forward.
As of December 31, 2011, the Company did not have any amounts recorded pertaining to uncertain tax positions. The Company files federal and provincial income tax returns in Canada and federal, state and local income tax returns in the U.S., as applicable. The Company may be subject to a reassessment of federal and provincial income taxes by Canadian tax authorities for a period of three to five years from the date of the original notice of assessment in respect of any particular taxation year. In certain circumstances, the U.S. federal statute of limitations can reach beyond the standard three year period. U.S. state statutes of limitations for income tax assessment vary from state to state.
| PANACEA GLOBAL, INC. (A Development Stage Company) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2011 |
9. CAPITAL ASSETS
| Cost | Accumulated Depreciation | December 31, 2011 Net Book Value | December 31, 2010 Net Book Value |
Computer equipment | 2,000 | 297 | 1,703 | - |
Leasehold improvements | 51,013 | 3,092 | 47,291 | - |
| 53,013 | 3,389 | 49,624 | - |
During the year, the Company began acquiring and using capital assets which were depreciated accordingly.
In December 2004, FASB issued FASB 123R, “Share-Based Payment (now ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation”). On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB 123R using the modified prospective transition method. Under this method, compensation expense is recorded for all stock based awards granted after the date of adoption and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that remain outstanding as of the beginning of the adoption. Under ASC 718, employee-compensation expense related to stock based payments is recorded over the requisite service period based on the grant date fair value of the awards.
The compensation expense that has been recognized for options granted was $1,124,367 for the nine months ended December 31, 2011. For stock options issued as non-qualified stock options, a tax deduction is not allowed until the options are exercised. The amount of this deduction will be the difference between the fair value of the Company’s common stock and the exercise price at the date of exercise. Accordingly, there is a deferred tax asset recorded for the tax effect of the financial statement expense recorded. The tax effect of the income tax deduction in excess of the financial statement expense will be recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital. Due to the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to generate sufficient taxable income in the future to utilize the tax benefits of the options granted, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance to reduce gross deferred tax assets to zero. As a result, for the year ended December 31, 2011, there is no income tax expense impact from recording the fair value of options granted. There is no tax deduction allowed by the Company for incentive stock options.
The Company has one stockholder approved equity compensation plan. The following section summarizes the Company’s equity compensation arrangements.
The Company’s stockholders have adopted an incentive stock plan to recognize the contribution made to the Company by its associates (including associates who are members of the Board of Directors), directors, consultants and advisors of the Company or any Affiliate to provide such persons with additional incentive to devote themselves to the future success of the Company or an Affiliate, and to improve the ability of the Company or an Affiliate to attract, retain, and motivate individuals upon whom the Company’s sustained growth and financial success depend, by providing such persons with an opportunity to acquire or increase their proprietary interest in the Company. To this end, the Plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, phantom stock and dividend equivalent rights.
The Plan shall be administered by the Board of Directors, or, in the discretion of the Board of Directors, by a committee composed of two (2) or more of the members of the Board of Directors. To the extent possible, and to the extent the Board of Directors deems it necessary or appropriate, each member of the Committee shall be a non- employee director and an outside director; however, the Board of Directors may designate two or more committees to operate and administer the Plan in its stead.
10. | PANACEA GLOBAL, INC. (A Development Stage Company) NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DECEMBER 31, 2011 EQUITY COMPENSATION (continued) |
The following awards have been granted under the Plan during 2011:
On July 26, 2011, the Company issued 4,500,000 stock options to two of its directors, and one employee, vesting immediately upon grant. These options are exercisable at a price of $0.55 per share, expiring ten years from vest date and are valued at $1,124,367 (approximately $0.2499 per option) utilizing the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model, with $1,124,367 recorded as compensation expense in 2011.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing Model to estimate the fair value of awards on the measurement date using the weighted average assumptions noted in the following table:
Year | Risk Free Interest Rate | Dividend Yield % | Expected Volatility | Expected Life |
2011 | 2.99% | 0.0 | 100% | 120 months |
We considered implied volatility as well as our limited historical stock price volatility in developing our estimate of expected volatility. Management has determined that it cannot reasonably estimate a forfeiture rate given the insufficient amount of time and activity of share option exercise and employee termination patterns. The expected life of options, representing the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, was determined using the contractual term. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the expected life of the option is based on the interest rate for a similar time period of a U.S. Treasury note in effect on the date of the grant.
The following table provides consolidated summary information on the Company’s equity compensation plans for the year ended December 31, 2011.
| | 2011 |
| | Weighted Average |
| Number of Options | Exercise Price | Fair Value Per Option | Remaining Life (years) |
Options outstanding at December 31, 2010 | - | - | - | - |
Granted | 4,500,000 | 0.55 | 0.25 | 10 |
Exercised | - | - | - | - |
Forfeited or lapsed | - | - | - | - |
Options outstanding at December 31, 2011 | 4,500,000 | 0.55 | 0.25 | 10 |
As of December 31, 2011, there were no unrecognized compensation related to non-vested options.
11. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
Throughout the year, the company received payments from related parties to fund cash shortages. Amounts due to related parties are due to a company controlled by a shareholder of the Company.