U. S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-QSB
[X] | QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ___________ to _____________
Commission File Number: 000-29735
DAVI SKIN, INC.
Nevada | | | | 86-0907471 |
(State or other jurisdiction | | | | (IRS Employer |
of Incorporation) | | | | Identification Number) |
| | 4223 Glencoe Ave., Suite B130 | | |
| | Marina Del Rey, California 90292 | | |
| | (Address of principal executive offices) | | |
| | | | |
| | (310) 824-0800 | | |
| | (Issuer’s Telephone Number) | | |
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes X No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 or the Exchange Act).
Yes No X
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:
24,265,708common shares outstanding as of May 14, 2008
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: No
| TABLE OF CONTENTS | |
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
Item 1. | Financial Statements | |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation | |
Item 3. | Controls and Procedures | |
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION |
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | |
Item 5. | Other Information | |
Item 6. | Exhibits | |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Our unaudited financial statements included in this Form 10-QSB are as follows: |
| Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007; |
| Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the period from inception (March 21, 2004) through March 31, 2008; |
| Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March, 2008 and 2007 and for the period from inception (March 21, 2004) through March 31, 2008; |
| Notes to Financial Statements; |
These unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and the SEC instructions to Form 10-QSB. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the interim period ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the full year.
DAVI SKIN, Inc. |
(formerly MW Medical, Inc.) |
(A Developmental Stage Company) |
BALANCE SHEETS |
| | |
| As of March 31, 2008 | As of December 31, 2007 |
| (Unaudited) | (Audited) |
ASSETS | | |
CURRENT ASSETS | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ 12,944 | $ 46,558 |
Certificates of deposit | 7,342 | 7,342 |
Accounts receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts | 5,721 | 2,580 |
of $0 for March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 | | |
Inventory | 565,744 | 593,913 |
Prepaid expenses | 8,425 | 10,849 |
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | 600,176 | 661,242 |
| | |
Fixed Assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $12,234 | | |
and $10,264 at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively | 26,518 | 28,488 |
Deposit | 21,505 | 24,570 |
TOTAL ASSETS | 648,199 | 714,300 |
| | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | |
| | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 501,924 | 395,842 |
Accrued interest payable | 22,637 | 18,230 |
Notes payable, current | 200,000 | 200,000 |
Unissued shares | 19,800 | 19,800 |
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES | 744,361 | 633,872 |
| | |
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES | | |
Notes payable, net of discount | 452,958 | 447,958 |
| | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | 1,197,319 | 1,081,830 |
| | |
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | | |
Preferred stock; $.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares | | |
authorized and no shares issued and outstanding | - | - |
Common stock; $.001 par value; 90,000,000 shares authorized, | | |
24,265,708 and 17,061,208 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | 24,266 | 17,061 |
| | |
Additional paid in capital | 12,255,484 | 11,504,694 |
Accumulated deficit during developmental stage | (11,889,285) | (8,944,327) |
Net loss | (939,585) | (2,944,958) |
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | (549,120) | (367,530) |
| | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | $ 648,199 | $ 714,300 |
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
DAVI SKIN, Inc. |
(formerly MW Medical, Inc.) |
(A Developmental Stage Company) |
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
(Unaudited) |
| | | |
| Three Months Ended | From inception |
| March 31, 2008 | (March 21, 2004) |
| | | through |
| 2008 | 2007 | March 31,2008 |
Sales | $ 12,474 | $ 27,219 | $ 103,530 |
Cost of goods sold, includes write-down of inventory of | | | |
$23,000, $0, and $47,000, respectively | (23,863) | (2,188) | (59,582) |
Gross profit | (11,389) | 25,031 | 43,948 |
| | | |
Operating expenses | | | |
Selling, general and administrative | 97,737 | 325,334 | 4,001,670 |
Depreciation | 1,970 | 1,750 | 41,662 |
Consulting fees | 787,635 | 155,117 | 2,814,543 |
Employee stock options | - | 702,486 | 4,809,215 |
Professional fees | 43,055 | 257,823 | 1,238,893 |
Total operating expenses | 930,397 | 1,442,510 | 12,905,983 |
| | | |
Loss from operations | (941,786) | (1,417,479) | (12,862,035) |
| | | |
Other income (expenses) | | | |
Royalty income | 25,245 | 27,056 | 126,784 |
Interest income | - | 3,443 | 116,973 |
Interest expense | (23,044) | (6,405) | (151,279) |
Loss on disposal of assets | - | - | (38,700) |
Other income (expenses) | - | 7,039 | (20,613) |
Total other income (expense) | 2,201 | 31,133 | 33,165 |
| | | |
Net Loss | $ (939,585) | $ (1,386,346) | $ (12,828,870) |
| | | |
Basic loss per common share | (0.04) | (0.11) | |
| | | |
Diluted loss per common share | (0.04) | (0.11) | |
| | | |
Basic and diluted weighted average | | | |
common share outstanding | 21,963,076 | 12,226,720 | |
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
DAVI SKIN, Inc |
(formerly MW Medical, Inc.) |
(A Development Stage Company) |
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
(Unaudited) |
| | | |
| | | From inception |
| Three Months Ended | (March 21, 2004) |
| March 31, 2008 | through |
| 2008 | 2007 | March 31, 2008 |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | |
Net loss | (939,585) | (1,386,346) | (12,828,870) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to | | | |
net cash used in operating activities: | | | |
Prepaid consulting expense | - | 34,376 | 114,584 |
Stock based compensation & expenses | 24,360 | 702,486 | 6,092,466 |
Non cash consulting fee | 733,635 | 30,000 | 1,055,218 |
Depreciation and amortization | 1,970 | 1,750 | 41,662 |
Loss on sale of fixed assets | - | - | 38,700 |
Loan discount - interest expense | 5,000 | - | 15,000 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | |
Accounts receivable | (3,141) | (15,648) | (32,104) |
Inventory | 28,169 | 9,800 | (565,745) |
Prepaid expenses | 2,424 | 27 | (8,425) |
Deposits | 3,065 | - | (21,505) |
Contingent liabilities | - | - | 26,383 |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 106,082 | 162,354 | 501,968 |
Accrued interest | 4,407 | 6,304 | 109,560 |
Net cash used in operating activities | (33,614) | (454,897) | (5,461,108) |
| | | |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | |
Cash flow from investing activities: | | | |
Change in certificates of deposit | - | 579,362 | (7,342) |
Sale of fixed assets | - | - | 2,739 |
Purchase of fixed assets | - | - | (121,035) |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | - | 579,362 | (125,638) |
| | | |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | | |
Bank overdraft | - | (124,465) | - |
Proceeds from stock transactions | - | - | 4,679,890 |
Advance on future issuance of stock | - | - | 19,800 |
Proceeds from notes payable | - | - | 700,000 |
Proceeds from notes payable-related party | - | - | 200,000 |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | - | (124,465) | 5,599,690 |
| | | |
| | | |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | (33,614) | - | 12,944 |
| | | |
Cash at beginning of period | 46,558 | - | - |
| | | |
Cash at end of period | 12,944 | - | 12,944 |
| | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES | | | |
Interest paid | 13,637 | 0 | 52,789 |
Taxes paid | 900 | 0 | 900 |
| | | |
NON-CASH ACTIVITIES | | | |
From inception on March 21, 2004 through March 31, 2008, the Company issued 2,295,388 shares ofcommon stock for |
their outstanding balance of the related party note payable and accrued interest of $286,923. |
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
DAVI SKIN, INC
(Formerly MW Medical, Inc)
(A Development Stage Company)
March 31, 2008
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial statements. The interim financial statements present the balance sheet, statement of operations, and cash flows of the Company. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007. In the opinion of management, all normally recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position as of March 31, 2008, have been included in the financial statements. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of operations for the full year. Therefore, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Going concern:
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has incurred net losses of $730,027 for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, and has incurred cumulative net losses of $12,579,491 since its inception and will require additional capital for its operational activities. The Company has successfully developed and established a line of men’s and women’s skin care products. The Company has and is aggressively launching its products with several luxury retailers. While the Company has already invested substantial funds in developing, promoting, and marketing activities, additional funds will be required to continue these efforts to establish market presence and gain market shares. Additionally, the Company is in the process of finalizing the development of additional product lines. The Company believes that these endeavours will result in increased sales. However, as of March 31, 2008, the Company has insufficient cash to operate its business for the next twelve months. The Company has experienced revenues since the fourth quarter of 2006 and believes that while revenues will increase, they will not be sufficient to absorb expenses to maintain the Company as a going concern. As such, the Company must raise additional capital to achieve its business goals and to continue operations. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital through the future issuances of the common stock is unknown. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned uncertainties. The Company has not established a stabilized source of revenues sufficient to cover operating costs over an extended period of time.
Management anticipates that the Company will be dependent, for the near future, on additional investment capital to fund operating expenses before achieving operating profitability. The Company intends to further position itself so that it may be able to raise additional funds through the capital markets. While to date the Company has demonstrated the ability to do so, there are no assurances that it will succeed in raising additional capital. Management is currently pursuing several alternatives to raise additional capital. While the management believes it will be successful in raising the necessary funds for its immediate needs, there are no assurances that in the future the Company will be successful in this or any of its endeavours or become financially viable and continue as a going concern.
2. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, HISTORY AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT POLICIES
Description of business - Davi Skin, Inc., formerly MW Medical, Inc., (referred to as the “Company”) is involved in the establishment and development of an all natural grape-based skin care line. The Company launched the sale of its products, which are currently being sold in New York, during the year ended December 31, 2006.
History - On June 21, 2004, the Company completed and closed a Plan of Merger and Reorganization Agreement (“Merger Transaction”) with Davi Skin, Inc. (“Davi”), a privately owned company, whereby both parties agreed that a subsidiary of the Company would merge into and with Davi and become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. As consideration for this merger transaction, the Company issued 9,768,327 shares of its common stock in exchange for all the outstanding common stock of Davi on a one-for-one share exchange basis. The Agreement further provided for the Company’s officers and directors were to resign and the board of directors of Davi would become the board of directors for the Company. This transaction has been accounted for as a recapitalization or reverse merger whereby Davi would be considered the accounting acquirer, and the accounting history of the acquirer would be carried forward as the history for the Company and no goodwill would be recorded. Accordingly, the accompanying financial statements reflect the history of Davi from its date incorporation of March 21, 2004 (incorporated in the State of Nevada). Prior to the merger transaction, the Company had 645,033 shares of its common stock outstanding, $1,922 in accounts payable, $200,000 in a note payable to a related party and no assets.
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Development stage company. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 7 “Accounting and Reporting by Development-Stage Enterprises”. A development-stage enterprise is one in which planned principal operations have not commenced or if its operations have commenced, there has been no significant revenue there from.
Definition of fiscal year. The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.
Use of estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue recognition. Revenues are recognized when services are rendered and/or products are delivered. Costs and expenses are recognized during the period in which they are incurred.
Cash and cash equivalents. We consider all highly liquid short-term investments, with original maturities of three months or less, to be cash equivalents. Such cash equivalents generally are part of its cash management activities rather than part of its operating, investing, and financing activities. Changes in the market value of cash equivalents result in gains or losses that are recognized in the income statement in the period in which they occur.
Receivables. The Company’s accounts receivables represent financial instruments with a potential risk. We offer, and reserve the right to deny credit terms with credit limits to customers based on their creditworthiness. We retain the right to place approved accounts on credit hold should these accounts become delinquent. We will maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses should customers fail to make required payments. In addition, we monitor the accounts for aging, historical account balances, payment patterns, history of collectibility, and customer creditworthiness when determining the collectibility of bad debt. Accounts receivables are written off when all collection attempts have failed. Allowance for doubtful accounts may increase if circumstances warrant. We believe that our current account receivables are collectible.
Credit and concentration risk. The Company maintains deposit accounts in a single financial institution. From time to time, cash deposits may exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits. The Company currently does not maintain certificates of deposit in excess of federal deposit insurance limits.
Inventory. The Company’s inventory consists of finished goods and raw materials, is stated at the lower of cost or market and cost is determined by the first-in, first-out method. The Company regularly monitors inventory quantities on hand and records write-downs for excess and obsolete inventories based primarily on the Company’s estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements. Such write downs establish a new cost basis of accounting for the related inventory. Actual inventory losses may differ from management’s estimates, and such differences could be material to the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Fixed assets. Property and equipment are depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, generally 3-5 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the lease term or the estimated life of the asset. Depreciation and amortization is computed on the straight-line method. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Fair value of financial instruments. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 107, “Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” requires us to disclose, when reasonably attainable, the fair market values of its assets and liabilities, which are deemed to be financial instruments. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our financial instruments approximate their fair value due to their short-term nature.
Earnings (loss) per share. Basic earnings (loss) per share exclude any dilutive effects of options, warrants and convertible securities. Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed using the weighted-average number of outstanding common shares during the applicable period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are computed using the weighted-average number of common and common stock equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common stock equivalent shares are excluded from the computation if their effect is anti-dilutive. Stock options are anti-dilutive when the results from operations are a net loss, as is the case for the for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 or when the exercise price of the options is greater than the average market price of the common stock for the period.
Income taxes. The Company accounts for its income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes”, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. We established a valuation allowance for the full tax benefit of the operating loss carryforward due to the uncertainty regarding realization.
Comprehensive income (loss) . The Company has no components of other comprehensive income. Accordingly, net loss equals comprehensive loss for all periods.
Stock-based compensation - The Company accounts for its stock options under SFAS 123(R).
In order to determine compensation on options issued to consultants, and employees’ options, the fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company estimates the requisite service period used in the Black-Scholes calculation based on an analysis of vesting and exercisability conditions, explicit, implicit, and/or derived service periods, and the probability of the satisfaction of any performance or service conditions. The
Company also considers whether the requisite service has been rendered when recognizing compensation costs. The Company does not consider market conditions to be vesting conditions and an award is not deemed to be forfeited solely because a market condition is not satisfied.
4. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement will have a material effect on its financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS 159's objective is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS 141(R)), which replaces SFAS 141, Business Combinations, requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions. This Statement also requires the acquirer in a business combination achieved in stages to recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as the non-controlling interest in the acquiree, at the full amounts of their fair values. SFAS 141(R) makes various other amendments to authoritative literature intended to provide additional guidance or to confirm the guidance in that literature to that provided in this Statement. This Statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS 141 (R) will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. We do not expect adoption of SFAS 141(R) to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the FASB reached a consensus on Issue No. 07-1, Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements (EITF 07-1). The EITF concluded on the definition of a collaborative arrangement and that revenues and costs incurred with third parties in connection with collaborative arrangements would be presented gross or net based on the criteria in EITF 99-19 and other accounting literature. Based on the nature of the arrangement, payments to or from collaborators would be evaluated and its terms, the nature of the entity’s business, and whether those payments are within the scope of other accounting literature would be presented. Companies are also required to disclose the nature and purpose of collaborative arrangements along with the accounting policies and the classification and amounts of significant financial-statement amounts related to the arrangements. Activities in the arrangement conducted in a separate legal entity should be accounted for under other accounting literature; however required disclosure under EITF 07-1 applies to the entire collaborative agreement. This Issue is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied retrospectively to all periods presented for all collaborative arrangements existing as of the effective date. EITF 07-1 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. We do not expect Adoption of EITF 17-1 to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS 160), which amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards that require the ownership interests in subsidiaries not held by the parent to be clearly identified, labelled and presented in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. This statement also requires the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income. Changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest must be accounted for consistently, and when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained non-controlling equity investment in the former subsidiary must be initially measured at fair value. The gain or loss on the deconsolidation of the subsidiary is measured using the fair value of any non-controlling equity investment. The Statement also requires entities to provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the non-controlling owners. This Statement applies prospectively to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements and applies prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS 160 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. We do not expect adoption of SFAS 160 to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2007, the EITF of the FASB reached a consensus on Issue No. 07-3, Accounting for Non-refundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities (EITF 07-3). EITF 07-3 requires that non-refundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities should be deferred and capitalized. As the related goods are delivered or the services are performed, or when the goods or services are no longer expected to be provided, the deferred amounts would be recognized as an expense. This Issue is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007 and earlier application is not permitted. This consensus is to be applied prospectively for new contracts entered into on or after the effective date. EITF 07-03 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. The pronouncement is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (SFAS 161), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 133). This statement is intended to improve financial reporting of derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The provisions of SFAS 161 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. SFAS 161 will be effective for us on January 1, 2009. The pronouncement did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We outsource a portion of our operational activities to companies with greater expertise in certain areas in order to keep our overhead expenditures to a minimum. Currently our payroll function is outsourced to an accounting firm with one of its partners being both a member of our Executive Advisory Board and a relative of an officer who is also a member of our Board of Directors.
6. NOTES PAYABLE
The Company and an unrelated third party have entered into an agreement whereby the third party is willing to provide, subject to the terms and conditions of the agreement; certain financing for the Company’s ongoing and proposed business operations and activities. The agreement provides for a 9% Senior Secured Convertible Note in the stated amount of $2,200,000. The initial advance ($500,000) is to be secured by a certain license agreement by and between the Company, Constellation Wines U.S., and Robert Mondavi Corporation. The agreement provides an invitation to join the Board of Directors and receiving options to purchase 125,000 shares of the Company’s stock, and if the full amount is funded, will receive stock purchase warrants up to 4,000,000 shares or a proportional number of shares if funded less than $2,200,000. As of March 31, 2008, the Company has received $500,000 (the initial advance). The agreement has been terminated and the Company will not receive any more funding from this note. The balance of this loan is due May 2010. Accrued interest is due quarterly. The loan is convertible at the option of the holder at $0.55 per share.
On November 16, 2007, the Company and an existing shareholder (less than 1% shareholder) entered into an agreement whereby the shareholder was willing to provide financing for the Company’s proposed business operations and activities. The agreement provides for a six-month note for $200,000 at an annual interest rate of 13 percent payable quarterly. The note is due May 2008 and may be converted at the option of the holder, to common shares of the Company at a price of $0.55 per share. The shareholder also received warrants to purchase 125,000 common shares at a price of $0.85. The Company has pledged its future revenues from a three year exclusivity agreement and inventory in the amount of the loan plus accrued accrued interest as collateral for the loan.
At March 31, 2008, maturities of notes payable are as follows:
Year ended December 31 | Amount |
2008 | $200,000 |
2009 | - |
2010 | 500,000 |
| $700,000 |
7. FIXED ASSETS
Fixed assets consist of the following as of March 31, 2008:
Furniture and fixtures | | $ | 6,972 | |
Computer equipment | | | 9,932 | |
Printer | | | 4,848 | |
Leasehold improvements | | | 17,000 | |
| | | 38,752 | |
Less: accumulated depreciation | | | (12,234 | ) |
Fixed assets, net | | $ | 26,518 | |
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease agreements. On May 18, 2006, the Company entered into a 3-year lease agreement with Marina Glencoe, LLC, a California limited liability company, to lease approximately 1,980 square feet of office space located at 4223 Glencoe Ave, Suite B130 Marina Del Rey, CA 90292. The lease provides for monthly rental payments, including parking and utilities of $ 4,643 for the first 12 months, $ 4,775.54 for months 13 - 24 and $4,912.05 for months 24 - 36. The Company provided a letter of credit in the amount of $49,896 as a security deposit.
Future minimum annual lease payments and principal payments under existing agreements are as follows:
12 months ending March 31, | | | |
2008 | | $ | 63,798 | |
2009 | | | 43,303 | |
Total | | $ | 107,101 | |
Total rental expenses under non-cancellable lease terms in excess of one year was $15,047, $13,929, and $166,997 for the three month period ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, and the period from inception (March 21, 2004) through March 31, 2008, respectively.
9. CONCENTRATIONS
The Company’s sales to four customers during the three month period ended March 31, 2008 accounted for 70.6% of total sales for the period.
10. CAPITAL STOCK TRANSACTIONS
Preferred stock- The authorized preferred stock is 10,000,000 shares at $0.001 par value. As of March 31, 2008 there were no preferred shares issued or outstanding.
Common Stock- The authorized common stock is 90,000,000 shares at $0.001 par value. As of March 31, 2008, there were 24,265,708shares of common stock outstanding.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 6,900,000 shares of common stock to its director and officers. The Company expensed $724,500for the 6,900,000 shares issued at a price of $0.105per share.
11. COMMON STOCK OPTIONS
The following is a summary of the stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2008:
| | Number of Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
Outstanding at January 1, 2008 | | | 835,000 | | $ | 0.28 | |
Options Granted | | | - | | $ | - | |
Options Cancelled | | | - | | $ | - | |
Options Exercised | | | - | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | |
Outstanding at March 31, 2008 | | | 835,000 | | $ | 0.28 | |
| | | | | | | |
Exercisable at March 31, 2008 | | | 835,000 | | $ | 0.28 | |
The details of the vested stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2008 are as follows:
| | Options Outstanding | | Options Exercisable | |
Range of Exercisable Prices | | Number Outstanding | | Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Number Exercisable | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
$0.25 - $1.00 | | | 835,000 | | | | | | 1.55 | | $ | 0.28 | | | 835,000 | | $ | 0.28 | |
12. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On or about August 2, 2006, a lawsuit entitled Artist House Holdings, Inc. vs. Davi Skin, Inc. et. al., United States District Court, District of Nevada, Case No. 2:06-CV-893-RLH-LRL, was filed in federal district court in Nevada against the Company, its directors, and other individuals. The plaintiff, Artist House Holdings, Inc., is a shareholder in the Company. The complaint alleged violations of federal securities law and Nevada securities law, breach of contract, and related claims arising from the plaintiff's investment in Company. A First Amended Complaint was filed on July 31, 2006, and a Second Amended Complaint on January 8, 2007. On December 22, 2006, the plaintiffs filed an emergency motion for a preliminary injunction, which the District Court denied on January 12, 2007. On January 26, 2007, the Company and its directors filed a motion to dismiss the federal securities law claim. That motion was granted on March 27, 2007. The Court gave the plaintiff leave to amend, and plaintiff subsequently filed an amended complaint to restate the claims not dismissed and to add a party defendant. We filed an answer to the amended complaint on May 17, 2007.
On January 16, 2008, Davi Skin, Carlo Mondavi, Joshua LeVine and Joseph Spellman (hereinafter “Davi”), entered into a Settlement Agreement with Artist House Holdings, Inc. to resolve litigation in the matter of Artist House Holdings,Inc. v. Davi Skin, Inc., et al., (Case No. 2:06-CV-893-RLH-LRL) in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
The settlement agreement was conditioned upon a judgment and bar order that indicates that the settlement is in good faith, and that a bar order is necessary to ensure that defendants in the case are not subject to “claims over” for contribution, indemnification, or any other claim predicated on another party’s liability or potential liability to Artist House. On January 28, 2008, motion for Entry Of Judgment and Bar Order and the Proposed Judgment and Bar Order filed with the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. On March 18, 2008 the Motion was denied without prejudice and the Parties are now attempting a global settlement. The settlement amounts are covered by the insurance carrier.
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On or about April 1, 2008, the Company entered into a First Amended and Restated Agreement for Convertible Note with Amin S. Lakha (“Lakha”). The basic terms of the agreement are: The Parties entered into an Amended and Restated Secured Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $536,163 due and payable on May 15, 2010 ; The Parties entered into an Amended and Restated Security Agreement, whereby all sums due under the Letter Agreement between the Company and Constellation Wines, U.S., Inc. shall be assigned directly to Lakha until the Restated Convertible Note is fully extinguished and such funds shall be applied directly to the principal sum owe; In addition Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) shall be payable to Lakha as a full and complete release of any and all payments that may have been due to Lakha pursuant to the terms of the original Assignment Agreement; The Parties have entered into a restatement and replacement of the Stock Option Agreement and Stock Purchase Warrant Agreement, Company shall issue to Lakha 600,000 warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.20 with an expiration date of May 14, 2012 and 125,000 warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.25 with an expiration date of May 14, 2012 and the Parties entered into a Rescission of Assignment and Security Agreement for the Gilchrist & Soames Agreement.
On or about April 14, 2008 the Company entered into a First Amended and Restated Loan Agreement with Gisela Brinkhaus (“Brinkhaus”) the terms of which are: The Parties entered into an Amended and Restated Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of $100,000 and interest of 13% per annum, due and payable on January 14, 2009 ; The Parties entered into a restatement and complete replacement of the Original Warrants, Company shall issue Restated Warrants up to 300,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.35 per share which shall expire on November 14, 2010 . As consideration for the difference between the Debt and the principal amount of the Restated Convertible Note the Company shall issue Brinkhaus 2, 207,960 shares of common stock. Brinkhaus has released any and all collateral rights to Company’s Inventory Collateral and the right to file any UCC-1 Financing Statement in connection with the Inventory Collateral. In the Original Agreement, the Company pledged as a security against default all payments that may become due and owing to the Company under the Memorandum of Understanding between the Company and deSter N.V., Brinkhaus shall retain these collateral rights and under acknowledges that at this time no final agreement has been executed between deSter and the Company.
On or about April 17, 2008 the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Noctua Fund, LP ("Noctua"). Noctua purchased 250,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock par value $.001 per share of the Company's Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $1.00 per share and Series A-1 Warrants to purchase common stock, par value $0.001 of the Company at an exercise price of $.15 per share. Company as part of the transaction delivered a Registration of Rights Agreement, Stock Escrow Agreement and a Certificate of Designation. The Company's management issued Irrevocable Voting Proxy and Trust Agreements. Noctua has the right but not the obligation to acquire an additional 350,000 shares of Preferred Stock at the Purchase Price listed above. Company granted a right of first offer and registration rights to Noctua with respect to all transactions consummated within 12 months of the Initial Closing of the sale of Preferred Stock.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Additional information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.
Overview
We are principally engaged in the development, manufacturing and distribution of Davi luxury branded products including the Davi luxury line of skincare for men and women that encompass the anti-oxidant rich by-products of the winemaking process coupled with the latest innovations in modern technology. We also function as a licensor and licensing agent to entities interested in associating their products with our luxury brand names.
Skin Care Products
The development of the Davi Skin luxury branded skincare product line is now complete. We are selling the initial nine (9) SKUs, four (4) products in the women’s line and five (5) products in the men’s line, which are described in more detail below. All the products are available since to our retail launch in October 2006. The products are now available through Bliss World Catalogs and their corresponding website; the luxury hotel and spa, Meadow Wood, located in the Napa Valley; the Living Beauty section of Selfridges department store in London, England: and Lane Crawford in Hong Kong. We are finalizing distribution agreements with several retailers located throughout Europe, Asia, the United States and Canada. We anticipate that our products will be available through these retailers by year end 2008. These select upscale retailers submit purchase orders for quantities of our branded products, which we fulfil from our distribution center. Planned distribution will continue to expand into 2008 through the utilization of select distribution companies throughout the world to help oversee the growth and development of the brand.
The initial nine (9) SKUs include four (4) products for women and five (5) for men are described in detail below.
Women’s Line:
§ | Le Grand Cru for Women — An ultra-luxurious cream designed for women to provide a unique, long lasting, slow released infusion of anti-oxidants and moisture to the skin in order to make it smoother, softer and more supple; |
§ | Vine Fresh SPF 30 Lotion — Oil free everyday moisturizer with UVB/UVA protection of an SPF 30. Formulated as a light, non-greasy formula, which is perfect for any type of skin, to moisturize and protect against oxidative damage such as pollution and stress; |
§ | Moscato Purifying Cleanser — A gentle, luxurious, creamy product designed to cleanse and condition at the same time; |
§ | Harvest Mist Toner — A super hydrating mist, formulated to tone, hydrate and refresh dull complexion. |
Men’s Line:
§ | Le Grand Cru for Men — An ultra-luxurious cream designed for men to provide a unique, long lasting, slow released infusion of anti-oxidants and moisture to the skin in order to make it smoother, softer and more supple; |
§ | Vine Fresh SPF 15 Lotion — Oil free everyday moisturizer with UVB/UVA protection of an SPF 15. Formulated as a light, non-greasy formula, which is perfect for any type of skin, to moisturize and protect against oxidative damage such as pollution and stress; |
§ | Reserve Shave Cream — A luxurious shave cream designed to provide an extraordinarily close yet comfortable shave; |
§ | Coastal Vine After Shave — An aftershave elixir /tonic used to soothe freshly shaved skin, reduce irritation, and provide moisturizing properties; |
§ | Crushed Grape Seed Exfoliating Cleanser —Infused with crushed grape seeds this product is designed to cleanse, exfoliate, and condition at the same time. |
At the core of all our products is a proprietary microencapsulated anti-aging antioxidant complex called Meritage that was created in collaboration with laboratories in Lyon, France. Meritage is a blend of grape and fermented wine extracts, green tea, raspberry, blackcurrant, and bilberry extracts amongst other select key ingredients. The Meritage complex is created through a unique double fermentation process, which allows for the select high-level antioxidants to remain active on the skin longer than conventionally created products.
Licensing Agent
In order to further our success and to leverage the highly visible and well-respected Mondavi name into other market categories, we entered into an agreement with Constellation Brands Group (“CBG”), the parent entity of The Robert Mondavi Corporation (“RMC”). RMC has retained us to act as their licensing agent in agreements with Waterford Wedgewood USA, Inc. (“Waterford”) on the development of a Robert Mondavi stemware line. CBG owns certain intellectual property rights held in RMC, including the valued Robert-Mondavi licensed marks (the “Intellectual Property”), and we have been engaged to: (1) negotiate opportunities with Waterford to license the Intellectual Property with Waterford’s stemware products, (2) develop and implement strategic plans for branding Waterford’s products, and (3) facilitate the terms and conditions of any agreements with Waterford. In exchange, CBG has agreed to compensate us with a revenue share of thirty three and one-third percent (33 -1/3%) of the gross revenues collected in any agreement we establish with Waterford. Gross revenues means the gross receipts actually received from any agreement with Waterford, including without limitation advance payments, minimum guarantees, royalty payments and other license fees.
Since we received a one-time $25,000 signing bonus during the first quarter of 2007 for the successful negotiation and execution of the Constellation licensing arrangement, we have received $96,212 in royalty payments.
Licensor
We entered into a relationship with Gilchrist and Soames, an industry leader in fine toiletries manufacturing, on the development of a Davi branded line of hotel amenity kits. The initial line of amenity products consists of shampoo, conditioner, bath gel, body lotion and soaps, with additional products to be developed in the future. The range of Davi amenity products will feature the same Meritage complex of antioxidants that is found in the Davi men and women's retail product lines.
Plan of Operation in the Next Twelve Months
Skin Care Line
The initial nine (9) SKUs include four (4) products for women and five (5) for men. All the products are now available pursuant to our retail launch in October 2006 with luxury retailer Bergdorf Goodman in New York City. Subsequent to the launch, the products have now also become available at Bliss World Catalogs and their corresponding website; the luxury hotel and spa, Meadow Wood, located in the Napa Valley; and the Living Beauty section of Selfridges department store in London, England. We are also finalizing distribution agreements with several select retailers located throughout Europe, Asia, and across the United States and Canada. We expect to have agreements finalized and to be able to make our products available for purchase through these retailers commencing in the 3rd quarter of this year. These select upscale retailers submit purchase orders for quantities of our branded products, which we fulfil from our distribution center. Planned distribution will continue to expand into 2010 through the utilization of select Distribution Companies throughout the world to help oversee the growth and development of the brand.
Product Development
We have developed a hotel amenity line of products for distribution into luxury hotel rooms worldwide in conjunction with Gilchrist & Soames, an industry leader in fine toiletries manufacturing. The initial line of amenity products will consist of shampoo, conditioner, bath gel, body lotion and soaps, with additional products to be developed in the future.
These amenity products feature the same Meritage complex of antioxidants that is found in our men’s and women’s retail line. Meritage is a microencapsulated blend of select antioxidants, including fermented grape extracts, which remain pure within the formula until application. Meritage's sustained time-release technology provides a slow infusion of antioxidant health benefits to the skin.
Manufacturer
Prior to our product launch in October 2006, we completed the research and development necessary to finalize the product designs and technical aspects needed to commence production of our products with our contract manufacturer. We completed the process of choosing all peripheral items involved in the manufacturing and marketing process, including:
§ | the final shape and size of the product containers; |
§ | the final selection of caps; |
§ | the final packaging design; |
§ | the logo and label designs; and |
§ | the final unit carton design and construction. |
Upon final selection of the packaging directions and the completion of technical drawings of the packaging itself, production of our initial nine (9) SKUs commenced. Upon the completion of production, finished goods were then shipped to our distribution warehouse to await distribution to our retail channels. We intend to continue working with our contract manufacturer to ensure that our product orders are responsive to the needs of our customers.
Luxury Branding and Acquisitions
During the normal course of business, our management team has been searching for other business opportunities that would allow us to diversify our sources of revenue.
In order to accomplish this new portion of our business plan, our board of directors will focus more on becoming a luxury brands headquarters. It is our intent to leverage our founder’s highly visible and well-respected Mondavi name into other market categories as well as to acquire new brands and intellectual properties to own, develop and license in the luxury category, while continuing to develop our original luxury skin care products.
It is our intent that our company will become a holding company that will maintain the intellectual properties, trademarks, copyrights and licenses of the various operating businesses we are able to acquire or partner with. We plan to own anywhere from 0% to 100% of these operational companies. Depending on the circumstances surrounding each opportunity, management anticipates it will choose to fund these operational companies or enter into joint ventures with them. The holding companies will generate revenues from all licenses it issues to use the Mondavi and Davi names.
New product development will commence as we further expand the Davi portfolio of branded products. It is our intent to create an international lifestyle brand consisting of several lifestyle products bearing the Davi name. These products will be made available through our developing network of retail distributors.
As our first step to further our new objective, we entered into an agreement with Constellation Brands Group, the parent entity of The Robert Mondavi Corporation. RMC has retained us to act as their licensing agent in agreements with Waterford Wedgewood USA, Inc. on the development of a Robert Mondavi stemware line. CBG owns certain intellectual property rights held in RMC, including the valued Robert-Mondavi licensed marks, and we have been engaged to (1) negotiate opportunities with Waterford to license the Intellectual Property with Waterford’s stemware products, (2) develop and implement strategic plans for branding Waterford’s products, and (3) facilitate the terms and conditions of any agreements with Waterford. In exchange, CBG has agreed to compensate us with a revenue share of thirty three and one-third percent (33 - 1/3%) of the gross revenues collected in any agreement we establish with Waterford. Gross revenues means the gross receipts actually received from any agreement with Waterford, including without limitation advance payments, minimum guarantees, royalty payments and other license fees.
On February 7, 2006, we successfully established the first license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Waterford. RMC granted to Waterford the exclusive right to use the Intellectual Property in connection with the manufacture and worldwide distribution of Waterford’s stemware, barware, decanters, and other related products (the “Licensed Products”). Pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement, we have been retained to facilitate promotional efforts of the Licensed Products. Specifically, we have been retained to provide Waterford the services of Carlo Mondavi, our Chairman and Founder, to act as spokesman for the Licensed Products and to make personal appearances at scheduled promotional events. In exchange, Waterford agreed to provide percentage royalties to RMC on net sales of the Licensed Products. Since we negotiated the terms and conditions of the License Agreement with Waterford and will provide promotional services to Waterford, we will share thirty three and one-third percent (33 -1/3%) in any proceeds received from the License Agreement.
Results of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
Assets. Our total assets as of March 31, 2008 were $648,199. Our total assets largely consist of inventory in the amount of $565,744. Our total assets as of March 31, 2007, were $1,040,011, consisting primarily of a certificate of deposit in the amount of $255,332, and inventory in the amount of $669,468. The decrease in cash and investments, our primary assets, are attributable to our administrative costs and our cost of promoting and developing our product lines, which were launched in October 2006.
Our total liabilities as of March 31, 2008 were $1,197,319, consisting primarily of accounts payable and accrued expenses in the amount of $501,924, and $700,000 in notes payable compared to total liabilities of $605,084 as of March 31, 2007 consisting primarily of accounts payable of $305,190 and $286,923 in a note payable-related party.
Sales. Sales consist of revenues from the sale of products from our skin care line. We reported sales of $12,474 for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, compared with revenue of $27,219 for the same period ended March 31, 2007. Our cost of goods sold for the three month ended March 31, 2008 totalled $23,863 resulting in gross profits of $(11,389). The cost of goods for the same period in 2007 was $2,188 resulting in a gross profit of $25,031.
Operating Expenses. Our operating expenses decreased by $512,113to $930,397for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to $1,442,510 for the same reporting period in the prior year. The decrease in expenses was largely attributable to a decrease in stock based compensation paid to our executive officers, administrative expenses, and professional fees. Our operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2008 consisted of selling, general and administrative expenses of $97,737, depreciation of $1,970, consulting fees of $787,635and professional fees of $43,055. In comparison, our operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2007 consisted of selling, general and administrative expenses of $325,334, depreciation of $1,750, consulting fees of $155,117, employee stock options of $702,486, and professional fees of $257,823.
Other Income (Expenses). Other income (expenses) consists mainly of royalty income from our licensing agreements and interest and interest expense on the notes payable. We reported Royalty income of $25,245 for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, compared to $27,056 for the same period ended March 31, 2007. Interest expense for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, totalled $23,044 compared to $6,405 for the same period in 2007. The increase in interest expense was attributable to additional note payable agreements entered into during 2007.
Net Loss. We reported a net loss of $939,585or $0.04per share for three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to a net loss of $1,386,346 or $0.11 per share for three months ended March 31, 2007.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of March 31, 2008, our total current assets of $600,176 consisted of $7,342 of certificates of deposit, $565,744 of inventory, $5,721 of accounts receivable, and $8,425 of prepaid expenses. As of March 31, 2008, our total current liabilities of $744,361 consisted of $501,924 in accounts payable and accrued expenses, interest payable of $22,637, and a note payable of $200,000. We thus had negative working capital of $144,185 at March 31, 2008.
Net cash used in operating activities was $33,614 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to net cash used in operating activities of $454,897 for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Net cash flow provided by investing activities amounted to $-0- for the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $579,362 for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Net cash flow used in financing activities amounted to $-0- for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, compared to net cash used in financing activities of $124,465 for the three month period ended March 31, 2007.
We will be dependent, for the immediate future, upon additional investment capital to fund operating expenses.
In connection with our need for additional financing, we entered into an Agreement for Convertible Note with an unrelated third party, Mr. Amin S. Lakha, whereby Mr. Lakha is willing to provide, subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement for Convertible Note and accompanying documents (the “Agreement”), certain financing for our ongoing and proposed business operations and activities. The Agreement provides for a 9% Senior Secured Convertible Note (the “Note”) in the stated amount of $2,200,000. Interest is payable in six month intervals and the note matures on May 15, 2010. The Note allows Mr. Lakha to convert a part or all of the outstanding balance under the Note into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.55 per share, which is subject to adjustment in the event of certain dilutive issuances, including stock dividends and reorganizations. As part of this agreement the Company received $500,000 during 2007.
On or about April 1, 2008, the Company entered into a First Amended and Restated Agreement for Convertible Note with Amin S. Lakha (“Lakha”). The basic terms of the agreement are: The Parties entered into an Amended and Restated Secured Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $536,163 due and payable on May 15, 2010 ; The Parties entered into an Amended and Restated Security Agreement, whereby all sums due under the Letter Agreement between the Company and Constellation Wines, U.S., Inc. shall be assigned directly to Lakha until the Restated Convertible Note is fully extinguished and such funds shall be applied directly to the principal sum owed; In addition Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) shall be payable to Lakha as a full and complete release of any and all payments that may have been due to Lakha pursuant to the terms of the original Assignment Agreement; The Parties have entered into a restatement and replacement of the Stock Option Agreement and Stock Purchase Warrant Agreement, Company shall issue to Lakha 600,000 warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.20 with an expiration date of May 14, 2012 and 125,000 warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.25 with an expiration date of May 14, 2012 and the Parties entered into a Rescission of Assignment and Security Agreement for the Gilchrist & Soames Agreement.
On November 16, 2007, the Company and an existing shareholder (less than 1% shareholder) entered into an agreement whereby the shareholder was willing to provide financing for the Company’s proposed business operations and activities. The agreement provides for a six-month note for $200,000 at an annual interest rate of 13 percent payable quarterly. The note is due May 2008 and may be converted at the option of the holder, to common shares of the Company at a price of $0.55 per share. The shareholder also received warrants to purchase 125,000 common shares at a price of $0.85. The Company has pledged its future revenues from a three year exclusivity agreement and inventory in the amount of the loan plus accrued interest as collateral for the loan.
On or about April 14, 2008 the Company entered into a First Amended and Restated Loan Agreement with Gisela Brinkhaus (“Brinkhaus”) the terms of which are: The Parties entered into an Amended and Restated Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of $100,000 and interest of 13% per annum, due and payable on January 14, 2009 ; The Parties entered into a restatement and complete replacement of the Original Warrants, Company shall issue Restated Warrants up to 300,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.35 per share which shall expire on November 14, 2010 . As consideration for the difference between the Debt and the principal amount of the Restated Convertible Note the Company shall issue Brinkhaus 2, 207,960 shares of common stock. Brinkhaus has released any and all collateral rights to Company’s Inventory Collateral and the right to file any UCC-1 Financing Statement in connection with the Inventory Collateral. In the Original Agreement, the Company pledged as a security against default all payments that may become due and owing to the Company under the Memorandum of Understanding between the Company and deSter N.V., Brinkhaus shall retain these collateral rights and under acknowledges that at this time no final agreement has been executed between deSter and the Company.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2008, there were no off balance sheet arrangements.
Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate continuation of our company as a going concern. We have incurred net losses of $939,585 for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, and has incurred cumulative net losses of $12,828,870 since our inception and will require additional capital for our operational activities. We have successfully developed and established a line of men’s and women’s skin care products. We have and are aggressively launching our products with several luxury retailers. While we have already invested substantial funds in developing, promoting, and marketing activities, additional funds will be required to continue these efforts to establish market presence and gain market shares. Additionally, we are in the process of finalizing the development of additional product lines. We believe that these endeavours will result in increased sales. However, as of March 31, 2008, we have insufficient cash to operate our business for the next twelve months. We have experienced revenues since the fourth quarter of 2006 and believe that while revenues will increase, they will not be sufficient to absorb expenses to maintain us as a going concern. As such, we must raise additional capital to achieve our business goals and to continue operations. Our ability to raise additional capital through the future issuances of the common stock is unknown. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned uncertainties. We have not established a stabilized source of revenues sufficient to cover operating costs over an extended period of time.
Management anticipates that we will be dependent, for the near future, on additional investment capital to fund operating expenses before achieving operating profitability. We intend to further position the company so that we may be able to raise additional funds through the capital markets. While to date we have demonstrated the ability to do so there are no assurances that we will succeed in raising additional capital. Management is currently pursuing several alternatives to raise additional capital. While the management believes it will be successful in raising the necessary funds for its immediate needs, there are no assurances that in the future we will be successful in this or any of our endeavours or become financially viable and continue as a going concern.
Critical Accounting Policies
In December 2001, the SEC requested that all registrants list their most “critical accounting polices” in the Management Discussion and Analysis. The SEC indicated that a “critical accounting policy” is one which is both important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results, and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We believe that the following accounting policies fit this definition.
Revenue recognition. We recognize revenues when services are rendered and/or products are delivered. Costs and expenses are recognized during the period in which they are incurred.
Receivables. Our accounts receivables represent financial instruments with a potential risk. We offer, and reserve the right to deny, credit terms with credit limits to customers based on their creditworthiness. We retain the right to place approved accounts on credit hold should these accounts become delinquent. We will maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses should customers fail to make required payments. In addition, we monitor the accounts for aging, historical account balances, payment patterns, history of collectibility, and customer creditworthiness when determining the collectibility of bad debt. Accounts receivables are written off when all collection attempts have failed. Allowance for doubtful accounts may increase if circumstances warrant.
Inventory. Our inventory consists of finished goods and raw materials, is stated at the lower of cost or market and cost is determined by the first-in, first-out method. We regularly monitor inventory quantities on hand and records write-downs for excess and obsolete inventories based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements. Such writedowns establish a new cost basis of accounting for the related inventory. Actual inventory losses may differ from management’s estimates, and such differences could be material to our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Stock-based compensation. We account for stock options under SFAS 123(R).
In order to determine compensation on options issued to consultants, and employees’ options, the fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. We estimate the requisite service period used in the Black-Scholes calculation based on an analysis of vesting and exercisability conditions, explicit, implicit, and/or derived service periods, and the probability of the satisfaction of any performance or service conditions. We also consider whether the requisite service has been rendered when recognizing compensation costs. We do not consider market conditions to be vesting conditions and an award is not deemed to be forfeited solely because a market condition is not satisfied.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement will have a material effect on its financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 provides companies with an option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. SFAS 159's objective is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity's first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (SFAS 141(R)), which replaces SFAS 141, Business Combinations, requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions. This Statement also requires the acquirer in a business combination achieved in stages to recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as the non-controlling interest in the acquiree, at the full amounts of their fair values. SFAS 141(R) makes various other amendments to authoritative literature intended to provide additional guidance or to confirm the guidance in that literature to that provided in this Statement. This Statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. SFAS 141 (R) will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. We do not expect adoption of SFAS 141(R) to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the FASB reached a consensus on Issue No. 07-1, Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements (EITF 07-1). The EITF concluded on the definition of a collaborative arrangement and that revenues and costs incurred with third parties in connection with collaborative arrangements would be presented gross or net based on the criteria in EITF 99-19 and other accounting literature. Based on the nature of the arrangement, payments to or from collaborators would be evaluated and its terms, the nature of the entity’s business, and whether those payments are within the scope of other accounting literature would be presented. Companies are also required to disclose the nature and purpose of collaborative arrangements along with the accounting policies and the classification and amounts of significant financial-statement amounts related to the arrangements. Activities in the arrangement conducted in a separate legal entity should be accounted for under other accounting literature; however required disclosure under EITF 07-1 applies to the entire collaborative agreement. This Issue is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, and is to be applied retrospectively to all periods presented for all collaborative arrangements existing as of the effective date. EITF 07-1 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. We do not expect Adoption of EITF 17-1 to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS 160), which amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards that require the ownership interests in subsidiaries not held by the parent to be clearly identified, labelled and presented in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. This statement also requires the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest to be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income. Changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest must be accounted for consistently, and when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained non-controlling equity investment in the former subsidiary must be initially measured at fair value. The gain or loss on the deconsolidation of the subsidiary is measured using the fair value of any non-controlling equity investment. The Statement also requires entities to provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the non-controlling owners. This Statement applies prospectively to all entities that prepare consolidated financial statements and applies prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
SFAS 160 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. We do not expect adoption of SFAS 160 to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2007, the EITF of the FASB reached a consensus on Issue No. 07-3, Accounting for Non-refundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities (EITF 07-3). EITF 07-3 requires that non-refundable advance payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities should be deferred and capitalized. As the related goods are delivered or the services are performed, or when the goods or services are no longer expected to be provided, the deferred amounts would be recognized as an expense. This Issue is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007 and earlier application is not permitted. This consensus is to be applied prospectively for new contracts entered into on or after the effective date. EITF 07-03 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. The pronouncement is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161 (SFAS 161), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 133). This statement is intended to improve financial reporting of derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The provisions of SFAS 161 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. SFAS 161 will be effective for us on January 1, 2009. The pronouncement did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Item 3. Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of March 31, 2008. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Jan Wallace, and our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Munjit Johal. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2008, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls
Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will necessarily prevent all fraud and material error. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving our objectives and our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at that reasonable assurance level. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the internal control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
A complete discussion of our ongoing legal proceedings is discussed in our annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007. There have been no material developments in the ongoing legal proceedings previously reported in which we are a party except as follows:
On or about August 2, 2006, a lawsuit entitled Artist House Holdings, Inc. vs. Davi Skin, Inc. et. al., United States District Court, District of Nevada, Case No. 2:06-CV-893-RLH-LRL, was filed in federal district court in Nevada against the Company, its directors, and other individuals. The plaintiff, Artist House Holdings, Inc., is a shareholder in the Company. The complaint alleged violations of federal securities law and Nevada securities law, breach of contract, and related claims arising from the plaintiff's investment in Company. A First Amended Complaint was filed on July 31, 2006, and a Second Amended Complaint on January 8, 2007. On December 22, 2006, the plaintiffs filed an emergency motion for a preliminary injunction, which the District Court denied on January 12, 2007. On January 26, 2007, the Company and its directors filed a motion to dismiss the federal securities law claim. That motion was granted on March 27, 2007. The Court gave the plaintiff leave to amend, and plaintiff subsequently filed an amended complaint to restate the claims not dismissed and to add a party defendant. We filed an answer to the amended complaint on May 17, 2007.
On January 16, 2008, Davi Skin, Carlo Mondavi, Joshua LeVine and Joseph Spellman (hereinafter “Davi”), entered into a Settlement Agreement with Artist House Holdings, Inc. to resolve litigation in the matter of Artist House Holdings,Inc. v. Davi Skin, Inc., et al., (Case No. 2:06-CV-893-RLH-LRL) in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
The settlement agreement was conditioned upon a judgment and bar order that indicates that the settlement is in good faith, and that a bar order is necessary to ensure that defendants in the case are not subject to “claims over” for contribution, indemnification, or any other claim predicated on another party’s liability or potential liability to Artist House. On January 28, 2008, motion for Entry Of Judgment and Bar Order and the Proposed Judgment and Bar Order filed with the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. On March 18, 2008 the Motion was denied without prejudice and the Parties are now attempting a global settlement. The settlement amounts are covered by the insurance carrier.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters have been submitted to our security holders for a vote, through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise, during the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008.
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit Number | Description of Exhibit |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Davi Skin, Inc. |
| |
Date: | May 20, 2008 |
| /s/ Jan Wallace |
| By: Jan Wallace Title: Chief Executive Officer and Director |