UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-21128
Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Robert I. Frenkel, Esq.
Legg Mason & Co., LLC
100 First Stamford Place
Stamford, CT 06902
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 1-877-721-1926
Date of fiscal year end: December 31
Date of reporting period: December 31, 2010
| ITEM 1. | REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS. |
The Annual Report to Stockholders is filed herewith.
December 31, 2010
Annual Repor t
Legg Mason
ClearBridge
Variable Small Cap
Growth Portfolio
INVESTMENT PRODUCTS: NOT FDIC INSURED • NO BANK GUARANTEE • MAY LOSE VALUE
| | |
| II | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio |
Portfolio objective
The Portfolio seeks long-term growth of capital.
Dear Shareholder,
We are pleased to provide the annual report of Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio for the twelve-month reporting period ended December 31, 2010. Please read on for a detailed look at prevailing economic and market conditions during the Portfolio’s reporting period and to learn how those conditions have affected Portfolio performance.
As always, we remain committed to providing you with excellent service and a full spectrum of investment choices. We also remain committed to supplementing the support you receive from your financial advisor. One way we accomplish this is through our website, www.leggmason.com/individualinvestors. Here you can gain immediate access to market and investment information, including:
| Ÿ | | Market insights and commentaries from our portfolio managers and |
| Ÿ | | A host of educational resources. |
Special shareholder notice
At the Board of Trustees’ regular meeting held in February 2011, Western Asset Management Company (“Western Asset”) was appointed as an additional subadviser of the Portfolio solely for cash management purposes. Western Asset personnel previously managed cash for the Portfolio through an arrangement with Legg Mason Partners Fund Advisor, LLC, the Portfolio’s investment manager.
We look forward to helping you meet your financial goals.
Sincerely,
R. Jay Gerken, CFA
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
February 9, 2011
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio | | | III | |
Investment commentary
Economic review
Despite continued headwinds from high unemployment and issues in the housing market, the U.S. economy continued to expand over the twelve months ended December 31, 2010. Toward the end of the reporting period, fears regarding moderating economic growth were replaced with optimism for a strengthening economy in 2011. With investor sentiment improving, U.S. equities moved sharply higher in the fourth quarter, while rising interest rates negatively impacted some sectors of the fixed-income market. All told, during 2010, investors who took on additional risk in their portfolios were generally rewarded.
In September 2010, the National Bureau of Economic Research (“NBER”), the organization charged with determining when recessions start and end, announced that the recession that began in December 2007 had concluded in June 2009. However, the NBER said, “In determining that a trough occurred in June 2009, the committee did not conclude that economic conditions since that month have been favorable or that the economy has returned to operating at normal capacity.” The NBER’s point is well-taken given continued areas of weakness in the U.S. economy.
Although the U.S. Department of Commerce continued to report positive U.S. gross domestic product (“GDP”)i growth, the expansion has moderated since peaking at 5.0% in the fourth quarter of 2009. A slower drawdown in business inventories and renewed consumer spending were contributing factors spurring the economy’s solid growth at the end of 2009. However, the economy grew at a more modest pace in 2010. According to the Commerce Department, GDP growth was 3.7%, 1.7% and 2.6% during the first, second and third quarters of 2010, respectively. The initial estimate for fourth quarter GDP was a 3.2% expansion.
Turning to the job market, while the unemployment rate moved lower in December 2010, it remained elevated throughout the reporting period. While 384,000 new jobs were created during the fourth quarter and the unemployment rate fell from 9.8% in November to 9.4% in December 2010, there continued to be some disturbing trends in the labor market. The unemployment rate has now exceeded 9.0% for twenty consecutive months, the longest period since the government began tracking this data in 1949. In addition, the U.S. Department of Labor reported in December that a total of 14.5 million Americans looking for work have yet to find a job, and 44% of these individuals have been out of work for more than six months.
There was mixed news in the housing market during the period. According to the National Association of Realtors (“NAR”), existing-home sales increased 7.0% and 8.0% in March and April, respectively, after sales had fallen for the period from December 2009 through February 2010. The rebound was largely attributed to people rushing to take advantage of the government’s $8,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers that expired at the end of April. However, with the end of the tax credit, existing-home sales then declined from May through July. Sales then generally rose from August through the end of the year. In total, existing-home sales volume in 2010 was 4.9 million, the lowest amount since 1997. Looking at home prices, the NAR reported that the median existing-home price for all housing types rose a tepid 0.3% in 2010. The inventory of unsold homes was an 8.1 month supply in December at the current sales level, versus a 9.5 month supply in November.
The manufacturing sector was one area of the economy that remained relatively strong during 2010. Based on the Institute for Supply Management’s PMIii, the manufacturing sector has grown seventeen
| | |
| IV | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio |
Investment commentary (cont’d)
consecutive months since it began expanding in August 2009. After reaching a six-year peak of 60.4 in April 2010 (a reading below 50 indicates a contraction, whereas a reading above 50 indicates an expansion), PMI data indicated somewhat more modest growth through the remainder of the year. However, in December, the manufacturing sector expanded at its fastest pace in seven months, with a reading of 57.0 versus 56.6 in November.
Financial market overview
The financial markets experienced several periods of volatility during the reporting period that tested the resolve of novice and experienced investors alike. During most of the first four months of the reporting period, the financial markets were largely characterized by healthy investor risk appetite and solid results by stocks and lower-quality bonds. The market then experienced sharp sell-offs in late April and in May, and again beginning in mid-November. During those periods, investors tended to favor the relative safety of U.S. Treasury securities. However, these setbacks proved to be only temporary and, in each case, risk aversion was replaced with solid demand for riskier assets.
Due to signs that certain areas of the economy were moderating in the second half of the reporting period, the Federal Reserve Board (“Fed”)iii took further actions to spur the economy. At its August 10th meeting, the Fed announced an ongoing program that calls for using the proceeds from expiring agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities to purchase longer-dated Treasury securities.
In addition, the Fed remained cautious throughout the reporting period given pockets of weakness in the economy. At its meeting in September 2010, the Fed said, “The Committee will continue to monitor the economic outlook and financial developments and is prepared to provide
additional accommodation if needed to support the economic recovery. . . .” This led to speculation that the Fed may again move to purchase large amounts of agency and Treasury securities in an attempt to avoid a double-dip recession and ward off deflation.
The Fed then took additional action in early November. Citing that “the pace of recovery in output and employment continues to be slow,” the Fed announced another round of quantitative easing to help stimulate the economy, entailing the purchase of $600 billion of long-term U.S. Treasury securities by the end of the second quarter of 2011. This, coupled with the Fed’s previously announced program to use the proceeds of expiring securities to purchase Treasuries, means it could buy a total of $850 billion to $900 billion of Treasury securities by the end of June 2011. At its final meeting of the year in December, the Fed said it “will regularly review the pace of its securities purchases and the overall size of the asset-purchase program in light of incoming information and will adjust the program as needed to best foster maximum employment and price stability.”
Equity market review
U.S. stock prices, as measured by the S&P 500 Indexiv (the “Index”), moved higher during the twelve months ended December 31, 2010. The reporting period got off to a solid start, with the Index moving higher during three of the first four months covered by this report. The market’s ascent was the result of a number of factors, including optimism regarding the economy, better-than-expected corporate profits and increased investor risk appetite. However, robust investor appetite was replaced with heightened risk aversion in May and June. This was due to the escalating sovereign debt crisis in Europe, uncertainties regarding new financial
reforms in the U.S. and some worse-than-expected economic data.
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio | | | V | |
After reaching a nineteen-month high on April 23, 2010, the market, as measured by the Index, fell into “correction territory” in May and plunged more than 10%. Despite continued disappointing economic data, strong second quarter corporate profits helped the market to rally in July. The market then declined again in August, given some disappointing economic data. With the Fed indicating the possibility of another round of quantitative easing, stock prices then moved sharply higher in September and October. After posting solid results in early November, the market weakened later in the month as financial troubles in Ireland resulted in a re-emergence of the European sovereign debt crisis. However, investor sentiment was buoyed in December by a two-year extension of the Bush-era tax cuts and the Index gained 6.68% during the month. This represented its strongest month of December since 1991. All told, the Index returned 15.06% over the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.
Looking at the U.S. stock market more closely, small- and mid-cap stocks generated the best returns during the twelve months ended December 31, 2010,
with the small-cap Russell 2000 Indexv and the Russell Midcap Indexvi gaining 26.85% and 25.48%, respectively. In contrast, the large-cap Russell 1000 Indexvii rose 16.10%. From an investment style perspective, growth and value stocks, as measured by the Russell 3000 Growthviii and Russell 3000 Valueix Indices, returned 17.64% and 16.23%, respectively.
As always, thank you for your confidence in our stewardship of your assets.
Sincerely,
R. Jay Gerken, CFA
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
January 28, 2011
All investments are subject to risk including the possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All index performance reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index.
| i | Gross domestic product (“GDP”) is the market value of all final goods and services produced within a country in a given period of time. |
| ii | The Institute for Supply Management’s PMI is based on a survey of purchasing executives who buy the raw materials for manufacturing at more than 350 companies. It offers an early reading on the health of the manufacturing sector. |
| iii | The Federal Reserve Board (“Fed”) is responsible for the formulation of policies designed to promote economic growth, full employment, stable prices and a sustainable pattern of international trade and payments. |
| iv | The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of 500 stocks and is generally representative of the performance of larger companies in the U.S. |
| v | The Russell 2000 Index measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000 Index, which represents approximately 8% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000 Index. The Russell 3000 Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the U.S. equity market. |
| vi | The Russell Midcap Index measures the performance of the 800 smallest companies in the Russell 1000 Index, which represents approximately 25% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 1000 Index. |
| vii | The Russell 1000 Index measures the performance of the 1,000 largest companies in the Russell 3000 Index, which represents approximately 92% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000 Index. |
| viii | The Russell 3000 Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 3000 Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. (A price-to-book ratio is the price of a stock compared to the difference between a company’s assets and liabilities.) |
| ix | The Russell 3000 Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 3000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. |
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 1 | |
Portfolio overview
Q. What is the Portfolio’s investment strategy?
A. The Portfolio seeks long-term growth of capital. Normally, the Portfolio invests at least 80% of its assets in equity securities of companies with small market capitalizations and related investments. We emphasize small-capitalization U.S. companies which we believe have favorable growth prospects and potential for significant capital appreciation. In selecting individual companies for investment, we look for:
| Ÿ | | Companies that either occupy a dominant position in an emerging industry or possess a growing market share in larger, fragmented industries |
| Ÿ | | Favorable sales and/or earnings growth trends |
| Ÿ | | High or improving return on capital |
| Ÿ | | Strong financial condition |
| Ÿ | | Experienced and effective management |
We invest in a fairly concentrated portfolio of approximately sixty to ninety stocks with an intended multi-year holding period. We utilize sector and individual position size risk limits in an effort to constrain volatility versus the investment benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Indexi (the “Index”). We will occasionally invest in small-capitalization non-U.S. issuers with characteristics similar to the portfolio’s U.S. holdings. The Portfolio may invest up to 20% of its assets in securities of foreign issuers, including those of emerging markets, directly or in the form of depository receipts representing an interest in those securities. We also, from time to time, use equity options to generate income and manage position size.
Q. What were the overall market conditions during the Portfolio’s reporting period?
A. The stock market ended a volatile 2010 with solid gains, marking a second straight
annual increase, although full-year results were not as strong as for 2009. Most major domestic stock market indices ended December 2010 at or near two-year highs, extending the rally that began during the third quarter in September, but remained below the levels of 2007. For the reporting period, the broad S&P 500 Indexii returned 15.06%, the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average (“DJIA”)iii gained 14.06% and the technology-oriented NASDAQ Composite Indexiv returned 18.15%.
The stock market started off the reporting period doing well, continuing the previous year’s rally into January, but it soon stumbled over fears about the potential impact of the European sovereign debt crisis and fell to new lows in February. The market managed to recover over the remainder of the first quarter and rose into the start of the second. The market was then shaken badly by the dramatic May 6th intraday point drop known as the “flash crash” and driven to new lows for the year in July by weaker-than-expected employment data. Those lows were tested over the summer as investors continued to forgo stocks for the relative safety of U.S. Treasuries, which fell to record low yields after weak housing sales data fueled fears that the fragile economy could fall into a double-dip recession.
Following indications from the Federal Reserve Board (“Fed”)v in late August of a second round of monetary stimulus, known as Quantitative Easing 2 or QE2, the market reversed course and began to rally at the start of September. The advance continued into the fourth quarter as stocks reacted positively to the mid-term election results and the start of QE2 in November, the extension of the Bush-era tax package in December and improving economic and corporate earnings data.
Q. How did we respond to these changing market conditions?
A. We added to our Consumer Discretionary holdings as the economic recovery
| | |
| 2 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report |
Portfolio overview (cont’d)
unfolded and a number of companies had accelerating growth trajectories. We also trimmed or eliminated a number of holdings, the market capitalization of which had moved into mid-cap range. In the second half of the year, we spent a lot of time researching Industrials stocks; however, the combination of unique product, strong strategy and reasonable strategy was difficult to find at a reasonable valuation, so our additions in the sector were selective.
We used equity options during the reporting period in an effort to control position size and generate incremental income for the Portfolio. Use of these options, primarily in a strategy of covered call writing, contributed positively to total Portfolio return for the period.
Performance review
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, Class I shares of Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio1 returned 25.18%. The Portfolio’s unmanaged benchmark, the Russell 2000 Growth Index, returned 29.09% over the same time frame. The Lipper Variable Small-Cap Growth Funds Category Average2 returned 27.81% for the same period.
| | | | | | | | |
| Performance Snapshot as of December 31, 2010 | |
| (unaudited) | | 6 months | | | 12 months | |
Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio1: | |
Class I | | | 30.35 | % | | | 25.18 | % |
Class II | | | 30.15 | % | | | 24.73 | % |
| Russell 2000 Growth Index | | | 32.14 | % | | | 29.09 | % |
| Lipper Variable Small-Cap Growth Funds Category Average2 | | | 30.65 | % | | | 27.81 | % |
The performance shown represents past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results and current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown above. Principal value and investment returns will fluctuate and investors’ shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost.
All share class returns assume the reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value and the deduction of all Portfolio expenses. Performance figures for periods shorter than one year represent cumulative figures and are not annualized.
Performance figures reflect expense reimbursements and/or fee waivers, without which the performance would have been lower.
Total Annual Operating Expenses (unaudited)
As of the Portfolio’s most current prospectus dated April 30, 2010, the gross total operating expense ratios for Class I and Class II shares were 0.92% and 1.25%, respectively.
Actual expenses may be higher. For example, expenses may be higher than those shown if average net assets decrease. Net assets are more likely to decrease and Portfolio expense ratios are more likely to increase when markets are volatile.
As a result of an expense limitation arrangement, the ratio of expenses, other than brokerage, interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses and acquired
| 1 | The Portfolio is an underlying investment option of various variable annuity and variable life insurance products. The Portfolio’s performance returns do not reflect the deduction of expenses imposed in connection with investing in variable annuity or variable life insurance contracts, such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges, which, if reflected, would reduce the performance of the Portfolio. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
| 2 | Lipper, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reuters, provides independent insight on global collective investments. Returns are based on the period ended December 31, 2010, including the reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, calculated among the 97 funds for the six-month period and among the 94 funds for the twelve-month period in the Portfolio’s Lipper category. |
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 3 | |
fund fees and expenses, to average net assets will not exceed 1.00% for Class I shares and 1.25% for Class II shares. This expense limitation arrangement cannot be terminated prior to December 31, 2012 without the Board of Trustees’ consent.
The manager is permitted to recapture amounts previously forgone or reimbursed to a class during the same fiscal year if the class’ total annual operating expenses have fallen to a level below the expense limitation in effect at the time the fees were earned or the expense incurred.
Q. What were the leading contributors to performance?
A. On an absolute basis, the Portfolio had positive performance in all ten equity market sectors for the reporting period. The greatest contributions to Portfolio performance for the period came from the Information Technology (“IT”), Consumer Discretionary and Health Care sectors.
Relative to the Index, stock selection in the Materials, Health Care, Utilities, Consumer Discretionary, Financials and Consumer Staples sectors made positive contributions to performance during the period. The Portfolio’s underweight position in the Health Care sector also helped relative performance for the period.
In terms of individual holdings, leading contributors to performance for the period included positions in Baidu.com Inc. (ADR) and Citrix Systems Inc., both in the IT sector, Rockwood Holdings Inc. in the Materials sector, as well as Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mettler-Toledo International Inc., both in the Health Care sector.
Q. What were the leading detractors from performance?
A. Our strategy of owning high-quality small-cap growth stocks was a significant factor in our underperformance of the Index. Due to declining interest rates during the period, the lower-return and more highly financially leveraged companies – stocks we ordinarily avoid – were among the strongest performers in the Index. Our
overall Portfolio volatility relative to the benchmark (as measured by the Portfolio’s betavi) during the period was also a detractor from relative performance, especially during the fourth quarter’s rapid market ascent.
Relative to the Index, overall sector allocation and overall stock selection detracted from performance for the period. In particular, our overweight to the Utilities sector and our underweight to the Consumer Discretionary sector detracted from relative performance for the period. The Portfolio’s cash position also negatively affected relative performance for the period in terms of allocation. Stock selection in the Energy, Industrials and IT sectors also hurt relative performance for the period.
On an individual holding basis, the leading detractors from performance for the period included positions in GMX Resources Inc. and Comstock Resources Inc., both in the Energy sector, Auxilium Pharmaceuticals Inc. and XenoPort Inc., both in the Health Care sector, and Blackboard Inc. in the IT sector.
Q. Were there any significant changes to the Portfolio during the reporting period?
A. Over the course of the period, we established new positions in a number of companies, including Monster Worldwide Inc. in the IT sector, Advance Auto Parts Inc., J. Crew Group Inc. and Lumber Liquidators Holdings Inc., all in the Consumer Discretionary sector, as well as Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. in the Financials sector.
We also closed our existing positions in a number of stocks, including Burger King Holdings Inc. in the Consumer Discretionary sector, Baidu.com Inc. (ADR) and F5 Networks Inc., both in the IT sector, CB Richard Ellis Group Inc. (Class A Shares) in the Financials sector and AmerisourceBergen Corp. in the Health Care sector.
| | |
| 4 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report |
Portfolio overview (cont’d)
Thank you for your investment in Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio. As always, we appreciate that you have chosen us to manage your
assets and we remain focused on achieving the Portfolio’s investment goals.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey J. Russell, CFA
Portfolio Manager
ClearBridge Advisors, LLC
Aram E. Green
Portfolio Manager
ClearBridge Advisors, LLC
January 18, 2011
RISKS: Investments in small-capitalization companies may involve a higher degree of risk and volatility than investments in larger, more established companies. Investments in foreign securities are subject to certain risks of overseas investing, including currency fluctuations and changes in political and economic conditions, which could result in significant market fluctuations.
The Portfolio may use derivatives, such as options and futures, which can be illiquid, may disproportionately increase losses, and have a potentially large impact on Portfolio performance. Please see the Portfolio’s prospectus for a more complete discussion of these and other risks, and the Portfolio’s investment strategies.
Portfolio holdings and breakdowns are as of December 31, 2010 and are subject to change and may not be representative of the portfolio managers’ current or future investments. The Portfolio’s top ten holdings (as a percentage of net assets) as of this date were: Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (2.7%), Rockwood Holdings Inc. (2.6%), iShares Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund (2.6%), IDEX Corp. (2.4%), SBA Communications Corp., Class A Shares (2.3%), Blackboard Inc. (2.2%), Bally Technologies Inc. (2.2%), MSC Industrial Direct Co. Inc., Class A Shares (2.2%), ITC Holdings Corp. (2.2%) and Taleo Corp., Class A Shares (2.1%). Please refer to pages 10 through 14 for a list and percentage breakdown of the Portfolio’s holdings.
The mention of sector breakdowns is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell any securities. The information provided regarding such sectors is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. Investors seeking financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies discussed should consult their financial professional. The Portfolio’s top five sector holdings (as a percentage of net assets) as of December 31, 2010 were: Information Technology (25.9%), Health Care (16.1%), Consumer Discretionary (14..8%), Industrials (11.3%) and Financials (8.0%). The Portfolio’s composition is subject to change at any time.
All investments are subject to risk including the possible loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. All index performance reflects no deduction for fees, expenses or taxes. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index.
The information provided is not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. Views expressed may differ from those of the firm as a whole.
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 5 | |
| i | The Russell 2000 Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. (A price-to-book ratio is the price of a stock compared to the difference between a company’s assets and liabilities.) The Russell 2000 Index measures the performance of the 2,000 smallest companies in the Russell 3000 Index, which represents approximately 8% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000 Index. The Russell 3000 Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the U.S. equity market. |
| ii | The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of 500 stocks and is generally representative of the performance of larger companies in the U.S. |
| iii | The Dow Jones Industrial Average (“DJIA”) is a widely followed measurement of the stock market. The average |
is comprised of thirty stocks that represent leading companies in major industries. These stocks, widely held by both individual and institutional investors, are considered to be all blue-chip companies.
| iv | The NASDAQ Composite Index is a market-value weighted index, which measures all securities listed on the NASDAQ stock market. |
| v | The Federal Reserve Board (“Fed”) is responsible for the formulation of policies designed to promote economic growth, full employment, stable prices and a sustainable pattern of international trade and payments. |
| vi | Beta measures the sensitivity of the investment to the movements of its benchmark. A beta higher than 1.0 indicates the investment has been more volatile than the benchmark and a beta of less than 1.0 indicates that the investment has been less volatile than the benchmark. |
| | |
| 6 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report |
Portfolio at a glance† (unaudited)
Investment breakdown (%) as a percent of total investments
| † | The bar graph above represents the composition of the Portfolio’s investments as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and does not include derivatives such as written options. The Portfolio is actively managed. As a result, the composition of the Portfolio’s investments is subject to change at any time. |
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 7 | |
Portfolio expenses (unaudited)
Example
As a shareholder of the Portfolio, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees and other Portfolio expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
This example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested on July 1, 2010 and held for the six months ended December 31, 2010.
Actual expenses
The table below titled “Based on Actual Total Return” provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information provided in this table, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. To estimate the expenses you paid on your account, divide your ending account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 ending account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During the Period”.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
The table below titled “Based on Hypothetical Total Return” provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5.00% per year before expenses, which is not the Portfolio’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use the information provided in this table to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Portfolio and other funds. To do so, compare the 5.00% hypothetical example relating to the Portfolio with the 5.00% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table below are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs. Therefore, the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Based on actual total return1 | | | | | | Based on hypothetical total return1 | |
| | | Actual Total
Return2 | | | Beginning
Account
Value | | | Ending
Account
Value | | | Annualized
Expense
Ratio | | | Expenses
Paid
During
the
Period3 | | | | | | | | Hypothetical
Annualized
Total Return | | | Beginning
Account
Value | | | Ending
Account
Value | | | Annualized
Expense
Ratio | | | Expenses
Paid
During
the
Period3 | |
| Class I | | | 30.35 | % | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,303.50 | | | | 0.92 | % | | $ | 5.34 | | | | | | | Class I | | | 5.00 | % | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,020.57 | | | | 0.92 | % | | $ | 4.69 | |
| Class II | | | 30.15 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,301.50 | | | | 1.25 | | | | 7.25 | | | | | | | Class II | | | 5.00 | | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,018.90 | | | | 1.25 | | | | 6.36 | |
| 1 | For the six months ended December 31, 2010. |
| 2 | Assumes the reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value. Total return is not annualized, as it may not be representative of the total return for the year. Total return does not reflect expenses associated with separate accounts such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges, which, if reflected, would reduce the total return. Performance figures may reflect compensating balance arrangements, fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of compensating balance arrangements, fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
| 3 | Expenses (net of fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements) are equal to the Portfolio’s annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent fiscal half-year (184), then divided by 365. |
| | |
| 8 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report |
Portfolio performance (unaudited)
| | | | | | | | |
| Average annual total returns1 | | | | | | |
| | | Class I | | | Class II | |
| Twelve Months Ended 12/31/10 | | | 25.18 | % | | | 24.73 | % |
| Five Years Ended 12/31/10 | | | 5.62 | | | | N/A | |
| Ten Years Ended 12/31/10 | | | 3.65 | | | | N/A | |
| Inception* through 12/31/10 | | | 6.57 | | | | 2.62 | |
| | | | |
| Cumulative total return1 | | | |
| Class I (12/31/00 through 12/31/10) | | | 43.18 | % |
| Class II (Inception date of 2/2/07 through 12/31/10) | | | 10.65 | |
All figures represent past performance and are not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. The returns shown do not reflect expenses associated with separate accounts such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges, which, if reflected, would reduce the total returns. Performance figures may reflect compensating balance arrangements, fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of compensating balance arrangements, fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower.
| 1 | Assumes the reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value. |
| * | Inception dates for Class I and II shares are November 8, 1999 and February 2, 2007, respectively. |
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 9 | |
Historical performance
Value of $10,000 invested in
Class I Shares of Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio vs Russell 2000 Growth Index† — December 2000 - December 2010
All figures represent past performance and are not a guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. The returns shown do not reflect expenses associated with separate accounts such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges, which, if reflected, would reduce the total returns. Performance figures may reflect compensating balance arrangements, fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of compensating balance arrangements, fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower.
| † | Hypothetical illustration of $10,000 invested in Class I shares of Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio on December 31, 2000, assuming the reinvestment of all distributions, including returns of capital, if any, at net asset value through December 31, 2010. The hypothetical illustration also assumes a $10,000 investment in the Russell 2000 Growth Index. The Russell 2000 Growth Index measures the performance of those Russell 2000 Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The Index is unmanaged and is not subject to the same management and trading expenses as a mutual fund. Please note that an investor cannot invest directly in an index. The performance of the Portfolio’s other class may be greater or less than the Class I shares’ performance indicated on this chart, depending on whether greater or lesser fees were incurred by shareholders investing in the other class. |
| | |
| 10 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report |
Schedule of investments
December 31, 2010
Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | | | | Shares | | | Value | |
| Common Stocks — 93.6% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Consumer Discretionary — 14.8% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 3.7% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bally Technologies Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 77,100 | | | $ | 3,252,849 | * |
Penn National Gaming Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 60,230 | | | | 2,117,084 | * |
Total Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,369,933 | |
Media — 1.3% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. | | | | | | | | | | | 304,326 | | | | 1,981,162 | * |
Specialty Retail — 9.8% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advance Auto Parts Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 32,040 | | | | 2,119,446 | |
Hibbett Sports Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 72,050 | | | | 2,658,645 | * |
J. Crew Group Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 47,377 | | | | 2,043,844 | * |
Jos. A. Bank Clothiers Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 45,703 | | | | 1,842,745 | * |
Lumber Liquidators Holdings Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 83,276 | | | | 2,074,405 | * |
Ross Stores Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 34,430 | | | | 2,177,698 | |
Urban Outfitters Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 39,640 | | | | 1,419,508 | * |
Total Specialty Retail | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 14,336,291 | |
Total Consumer Discretionary | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 21,687,386 | |
| Consumer Staples — 1.2% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Food & Staples Retailing — 1.2% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casey’s General Stores Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 41,520 | | | | 1,765,015 | |
| Energy — 3.9% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Energy Equipment & Services — 2.6% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lufkin Industries Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 27,041 | | | | 1,687,088 | |
Oceaneering International Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 29,520 | | | | 2,173,558 | * |
Total Energy Equipment & Services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,860,646 | |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 1.3% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comstock Resources Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 59,570 | | | | 1,463,039 | * |
GMX Resources Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 70,790 | | | | 390,761 | * |
Total Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,853,800 | |
Total Energy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,714,446 | |
| Exchange Traded Funds — 2.6% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
iShares Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund | | | | | | | | | | | 42,988 | | | | 3,758,011 | |
| Financials — 8.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital Markets — 3.9% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Affiliated Managers Group Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 29,760 | | | | 2,952,787 | * |
Duff & Phelps Corp., Class A Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 88,090 | | | | 1,485,197 | |
Financial Engines Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 68,583 | | | | 1,360,001 | * |
Total Capital Markets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,797,985 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 11 | |
Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | | | | Shares | | | Value | |
Commercial Banks — 1.9% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Old National Bancorp | | | | | | | | | | | 101,980 | | | $ | 1,212,542 | |
SVB Financial Group | | | | | | | | | | | 30,930 | | | | 1,640,837 | * |
Total Commercial Banks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,853,379 | |
Diversified Financial Services — 0.8% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Primus Guaranty Ltd. | | | | | | | | | | | 219,132 | | | | 1,113,191 | * |
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) — 0.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gramercy Capital Corp. | | | | | | | | | | | 40,370 | | | | 93,255 | * |
Real Estate Management & Development — 1.3% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 22,420 | | | | 1,881,486 | |
Total Financials | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11,739,296 | |
| Health Care — 16.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Biotechnology — 5.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Acorda Therapeutics Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 55,340 | | | | 1,508,568 | * |
Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 26,410 | | | | 2,127,326 | * |
ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 149,010 | | | | 759,951 | * |
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 76,810 | | | | 2,521,672 | * |
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 63,251 | | | | 598,355 | * |
Total Biotechnology | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7,515,872 | |
Health Care Equipment & Supplies — 1.8% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Conceptus Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 47,300 | | | | 652,740 | * |
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corp. | | | | | | | | | | | 42,969 | | | | 2,032,434 | * |
Total Health Care Equipment & Supplies | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,685,174 | |
Health Care Providers & Services — 3.5% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accretive Health Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 34,400 | | | | 559,000 | * |
Mednax Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 42,700 | | | | 2,873,283 | * |
Owens & Minor Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 56,250 | | | | 1,655,437 | |
Total Health Care Providers & Services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,087,720 | |
Health Care Technology — 0.9% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
athenahealth Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 33,460 | | | | 1,371,191 | * |
Life Sciences Tools & Services — 3.5% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Luminex Corp. | | | | | | | | | | | 59,330 | | | | 1,084,552 | * |
Mettler-Toledo International Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 26,360 | | | | 3,985,896 | * |
Total Life Sciences Tools & Services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,070,448 | |
Pharmaceuticals — 1.3% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Auxilium Pharmaceuticals Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 86,110 | | | | 1,816,921 | * |
Total Health Care | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 23,547,326 | |
| Industrials — 11.3% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Aerospace & Defense — 1.6% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Orbital Sciences Corp. | | | | | | | | | | | 135,087 | | | | 2,314,040 | * |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| | |
| 12 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report |
Schedule of investments (cont’d)
December 31, 2010
Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | | | | Shares | | | Value | |
Commercial Services & Supplies — 2.5% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Copart Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 28,610 | | | $ | 1,068,583 | * |
Corrections Corporation of America | | | | | | | | | | | 104,730 | | | | 2,624,534 | * |
Total Commercial Services & Supplies | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,693,117 | |
Construction & Engineering — 1.5% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Quanta Services Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 110,080 | | | | 2,192,794 | * |
Electrical Equipment — 0.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
A123 Systems Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 59,808 | | | | 570,569 | * |
Machinery — 3.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
IDEX Corp. | | | | | | | | | | | 90,930 | | | | 3,557,182 | |
Tennant Co. | | | | | | | | | | | 26,516 | | | | 1,018,479 | |
Total Machinery | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4,575,661 | |
Trading Companies & Distributors — 2.2% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MSC Industrial Direct Co. Inc., Class A Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 48,880 | | | | 3,162,047 | |
Total Industrials | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 16,508,228 | |
| Information Technology — 25.9% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Communications Equipment — 0.7% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Comverse Technology Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 150,060 | | | | 1,089,436 | * |
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components — 0.2% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Elster Group SE, ADR | | | | | | | | | | | 14,000 | | | | 236,600 | * |
Internet Software & Services — 8.2% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
comScore Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 56,897 | | | | 1,269,372 | * |
Dice Holdings Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 21,340 | | | | 306,229 | * |
Digital River Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 54,987 | | | | 1,892,653 | * |
Mercadolibre Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 37,850 | | | | 2,522,702 | * |
Monster Worldwide Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 118,770 | | | | 2,806,535 | * |
Taleo Corp., Class A Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 112,602 | | | | 3,113,445 | * |
Youku.com Inc., ADR | | | | | | | | | | | 3,600 | | | | 126,036 | * |
Total Internet Software & Services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12,036,972 | |
IT Services — 0.7% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Online Resources Corp. | | | | | | | | | | | 211,493 | | | | 983,442 | * |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 4.8% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cymer Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 39,370 | | | | 1,774,406 | * |
Integrated Device Technology Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 160,480 | | | | 1,068,797 | * |
LSI Corp. | | | | | | | | | | | 385,099 | | | | 2,306,743 | * |
Novellus Systems Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 21,390 | | | | 691,325 | * |
Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 33,100 | | | | 1,223,707 | * |
Total Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7,064,978 | |
Software — 11.3% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Aspen Technology Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 125,580 | | | | 1,594,866 | * |
Blackboard Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 79,630 | | | | 3,288,719 | * |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 13 | |
Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | | | | | | | Shares | | | Value | |
Software — continued | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fortinet Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 48,870 | | | $ | 1,580,945 | * |
Longtop Financial Technologies Ltd., ADR | | | | | | | | | | | 17,034 | | | | 616,290 | * |
MICROS Systems Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 46,378 | | | | 2,034,139 | * |
Radiant Systems Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 53,160 | | | | 1,040,341 | * |
Solarwinds Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 87,730 | | | | 1,688,802 | * |
Sourcefire Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 96,112 | | | | 2,492,184 | * |
Verint Systems Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 70,957 | | | | 2,249,337 | * |
Total Software | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 16,585,623 | |
Total Information Technology | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 37,997,051 | |
| Materials — 5.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Chemicals — 3.9% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rockwood Holdings Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 98,176 | | | | 3,840,645 | * |
Senomyx Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 112,910 | | | | 805,049 | * |
Solutia Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 46,290 | | | | 1,068,373 | * |
Total Chemicals | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,714,067 | |
Metals & Mining — 1.5% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Compass Minerals International Inc. | | | | | | | | | | | 24,246 | | | | 2,164,440 | |
Total Materials | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7,878,507 | |
| Telecommunication Services — 2.3% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Wireless Telecommunication Services — 2.3% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SBA Communications Corp., Class A Shares | | | | | | | | | | | 83,040 | | | | 3,399,658 | * |
| Utilities — 2.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Electric Utilities — 2.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
ITC Holdings Corp. | | | | | | | | | | | 50,860 | | | | 3,152,303 | |
Total Investments before Short-Term Investment (Cost — $107,510,982) | | | | 137,147,227 | |
| | | | |
| | | Rate | | | Maturity
Date | | | Face
Amount | | | | |
| Short-Term Investments — 4.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repurchase Agreements — 4.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest in $150,000,000 joint tri-party repurchase agreement dated 12/31/10 with Deustche Bank Securities Inc.; Proceeds at maturity — $5,976,110; (Fully collateralized by U.S. government agency obligations, 4.125% to 4.750% due 2/24/11 to 11/19/12; Market value — $6,095,562) (Cost — $5,976,000) | | | 0.220 | % | | | 1/3/11 | | | $ | 5,976,000 | | | | 5,976,000 | |
Total Investments — 97.7% (Cost — $113,486,982#) | | | | 143,123,227 | |
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities — 2.3% | | | | 3,401,766 | |
Total Net Assets — 100.0% | | | $ | 146,524,993 | |
| * | Non-income producing security. |
| # | Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is $114,056,184. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| | |
| 14 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report |
Schedule of investments (cont’d)
December 31, 2010
Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Schedule of Written Options | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Security | | Expiration
Date | | | Strike
Price | | | Contracts | | | Value | |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Call | | | 2/19/11 | | | $ | 38.00 | | | | 108 | | | $ | 7,560 | |
| (Premiums received — $7,452) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 15 | |
Statement of assets and liabilities
December 31, 2010
| | | | |
| |
| Assets: | | | | |
Investments, at value (Cost — $113,486,982) | | $ | 143,123,227 | |
Cash | | | 135 | |
Receivable for Portfolio shares sold | | | 3,337,882 | |
Receivable for securities sold | | | 2,409,858 | |
Dividends and interest receivable | | | 2,816 | |
Prepaid expenses | | | 2,477 | |
Total Assets | | | 148,876,395 | |
| |
| Liabilities: | | | | |
Payable for securities purchased | | | 2,171,644 | |
Investment management fee payable | | | 90,238 | |
Written options, at value (premium received $7,452) | | | 7,560 | |
Payable for Portfolio shares repurchased | | | 1,440 | |
Trustees’ fees payable | | | 1,171 | |
Distribution fees payable | | | 190 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 79,267 | |
Total Liabilities | | | 2,351,510 | |
| Total Net Assets | | $ | 146,524,885 | |
| |
| Net Assets: | | | | |
Par value (Note 6) | | $ | 95 | |
Paid-in capital in excess of par value | | | 120,775,760 | |
Accumulated net investment loss | | | (204,420) | |
Accumulated net realized loss on investments and written options | | | (3,682,671) | |
Net unrealized appreciation on investments, written options and foreign currencies | | | 29,636,121 | |
| Total Net Assets | | $ | 146,524,885 | |
| |
| Shares Outstanding: | | | | |
Class I | | | 9,415,791 | |
Class II | | | 61,224 | |
| |
| Net Asset Value: | | | | |
Class I | | | $15.46 | |
Class II | | | $15.28 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| | |
| 16 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report |
Statement of operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
| | | | |
| |
| Investment Income: | | | | |
Dividends | | $ | 449,564 | |
Interest | | | 10,302 | |
Total Investment Income | | | 459,866 | |
| |
| Expenses: | | | | |
Investment management fee (Note 2) | | | 927,915 | |
Legal fees | | | 59,410 | |
Shareholder reports | | | 57,158 | |
Audit and tax | | | 29,672 | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 11,149 | |
Transfer agent fees (Note 5) | | | 9,635 | |
Insurance | | | 3,655 | |
Custody fees | | | 3,177 | |
Distribution fees (Notes 2 and 5) | | | 1,148 | |
Miscellaneous expenses | | | 992 | |
Total Expenses | | | 1,103,911 | |
Less: Fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements (Notes 2 and 5) | | | (579) | |
Net Expenses | | | 1,103,332 | |
| Net Investment Loss | | | (643,466) | |
| |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investment, Written Options
and Foreign Currency Transactions (Notes 1, 3 and 4): | | | | |
Net Realized Gain From: | | | | |
Investment transactions | | | 12,474,925 | |
Written options | | | 473,582 | |
Net Realized Gain | | | 12,948,507 | |
Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) From: | | | | |
Investments | | | 16,306,673 | |
Written options | | | (108) | |
Foreign currencies | | | (7) | |
Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | | | 16,306,558 | |
| Net Gain on Investments, Written Options and Foreign Currency Transactions | | | 29,255,065 | |
| Proceeds from Settlement of a Regulatory Matter (Note 8) | | | 4,799 | |
| Increase in Net Assets From Operations | | $ | 28,616,398 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 17 | |
Statements of changes in net assets
| | | | | | | | |
| For the Years Ended December 31, | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
| | |
| Operations: | | | | | | | | |
Net investment loss | | $ | (643,466) | | | $ | (266,635) | |
Net realized gain (loss) | | | 12,948,507 | | | | (10,181,016) | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | 16,306,558 | | | | 46,517,313 | |
Proceeds from settlement of a regulatory matter (Note 8) | | | 4,799 | | | | — | |
Increase in Net Assets From Operations | | | 28,616,398 | | | | 36,069,662 | |
| | |
| Portfolio Share Transactions (Note 6): | | | | | | | | |
Net proceeds from sale of shares | | | 22,251,845 | | | | 17,106,917 | |
Cost of shares repurchased | | | (25,101,417) | | | | (19,912,122) | |
Decrease in Net Assets From Portfolio Share Transactions | | | (2,849,572) | | | | (2,805,205) | |
Increase in Net Assets | | | 25,766,826 | | | | 33,264,457 | |
| | |
| Net Assets: | | | | | | | | |
Beginning of year | | | 120,758,059 | | | | 87,493,602 | |
End of year* | | $ | 146,524,885 | | | $ | 120,758,059 | |
* Includes accumulated net investment loss of: | | | $(204,420) | | | | $(123,527) | |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| | |
| 18 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report |
Financial highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For a share of each class of beneficial interest outstanding throughout each year ended December 31: | |
| Class I Shares1 | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 20062 | |
| | | | | |
| Net asset value, beginning of year | | | $12.35 | | | | $8.65 | | | | $15.03 | | | | $14.66 | | | | $13.64 | |
| | | | | |
| Income (loss) from operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment loss | | | (0.07) | | | | (0.03) | | | | (0.04) | | | | (0.02) | | | | (0.03) | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 3.18 | | | | 3.73 | | | | (5.90) | | | | 1.50 | | | | 1.78 | |
Total income (loss) from operations | | | 3.11 | | | | 3.70 | | | | (5.94) | | | | 1.48 | | | | 1.75 | |
| | | | | |
| Less distributions from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gains | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.44) | | | | (1.11) | | | | (0.73) | |
Total distributions | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.44) | | | | (1.11) | | | | (0.73) | |
| | | | | |
| Net asset value, end of year | | | $15.46 | | | | $12.35 | | | | $8.65 | | | | $15.03 | | | | $14.66 | |
Total return3 | | | 25.18 | % | | | 42.77 | % | | | (40.71) | % | | | 10.01 | % | | | 12.77 | % |
| | | | | |
| Net assets, end of year (000s) | | $ | 145,589 | | | $ | 120,665 | | | $ | 87,435 | | | $ | 142,601 | | | $ | 77,815 | |
| | | | | |
| Ratios to average net assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross expenses | | | 0.89 | % | | | 0.91 | % | | | 1.09 | % | | | 0.88 | % | | | 1.02 | %4 |
Net expenses5 | | | 0.89 | | | | 0.91 | | | | 0.97 | 6 | | | 0.88 | | | | 1.02 | 4,6 |
Net investment loss | | | (0.52) | | | | (0.27) | | | | (0.33) | | | | (0.12) | | | | (0.23) | |
| | | | | |
| Portfolio turnover rate | | | 34 | % | | | 34 | % | | | 51 | % | | | 63 | % | | | 96 | % |
| 1 | Per share amounts have been calculated using the average shares method. |
| 2 | Represents a share of capital stock outstanding prior to April 30, 2007. |
| 3 | Performance figures may reflect compensating balance arrangements, fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of compensating balance arrangements, fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower. Total returns do not reflect expenses associated with separate accounts such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges which, if reflected, would reduce the total return for all periods shown. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
| 4 | Included in the expense ratios are certain non-recurring restructuring (and reorganization, if applicable) fees that were incurred by the Portfolio during the period. Without these fees, the gross and net expense ratios would both have been 0.96%. |
| 5 | As a result of an expense limitation arrangement, the ratio of expenses, other than brokerage, interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses, and acquired fund fees and expenses, to average net assets of Class I shares did not exceed 1.00%. This expense limitation arrangement cannot be terminated prior to December 31, 2012 without the Board of Trustees’ consent. |
| 6 | Reflects fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 19 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For a share of each class of beneficial interest outstanding throughout each year ended December 31,
unless otherwise noted: | |
| Class II Shares1 | | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 20072 | |
| | | | |
| Net asset value, beginning of year | | | $12.25 | | | | $8.61 | | | | $15.00 | | | | $15.27 | |
| | | | |
| Income (loss) from operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment loss | | | (0.11) | | | | (0.06) | | | | (0.07) | | | | (0.00) | 3 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 3.14 | | | | 3.70 | | | | (5.88) | | | | 0.84 | |
Total income (loss) from operations | | | 3.03 | | | | 3.64 | | | | (5.95) | | | | 0.84 | |
| | | | |
| Less distributions from: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net realized gains | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.44) | | | | (1.11) | |
Total distributions | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.44) | | | | (1.11) | |
| | | | |
| Net asset value, end of year | | | $15.28 | | | | $12.25 | | | | $8.61 | | | | $15.00 | |
Total return4 | | | 24.73 | % | | | 42.28 | % | | | (40.86) | % | | | 5.42 | % |
| | | | |
| Net assets, end of year (000s) | | | $936 | | | | $93 | | | | $59 | | | | $9 | |
| | | | |
| Ratios to average net assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gross expenses | | | 1.36 | % | | | 11.33 | % | | | 37.04 | % | | | 497.37 | %5 |
Net expenses6,7 | | | 1.23 | | | | 1.25 | | | | 1.25 | | | | 1.19 | 5 |
Net investment loss | | | (0.84) | | | | (0.62) | | | | (0.63) | | | | (0.32) | 5 |
| | | | |
| Portfolio turnover rate | | | 34 | % | | | 34 | % | | | 51 | % | | | 63 | % |
| 1 | Per share amounts have been calculated using the average shares method. |
| 2 | For the period February 2, 2007 (inception date) to December 31, 2007. |
| 3 | Amount represents less than $0.005 per share. |
| 4 | Performance figures may reflect compensating balance arrangements, fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. In the absence of compensating balance arrangements, fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements, the total return would have been lower. Total returns do not reflect expenses associated with separate accounts such as administrative fees, account charges and surrender charges which, if reflected, would reduce the total return for all periods shown. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Total returns for periods of less than one year are not annualized. |
| 6 | As a result of an expense limitation arrangement, the ratio of expenses, other than brokerage, interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses, and acquired fund fees and expenses, to average net assets of Class II shares did not exceed 1.25%. This expense limitation arrangement cannot be terminated prior to December 31, 2012 without the Board of Trustees’ consent. |
| 7 | Reflects fee waivers and/or expense reimbursements. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
| | |
| 20 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report |
Notes to financial statements
1. Organization and significant accounting policies
Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio (the “Portfolio”) is a separate diversified investment series of Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust (the “Trust”). The Trust, a Maryland statutory trust, is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company.
Shares of the Portfolio may only be purchased or redeemed through variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies offered by the separate accounts of participating insurance companies or through eligible pension or other qualified plans.
The following are significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Portfolio and are in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Estimates and assumptions are required to be made regarding assets, liabilities and changes in net assets resulting from operations when financial statements are prepared. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters used in determining these estimates could cause actual results to differ. Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date the financial statements were issued.
(a) Investment valuation. Equity securities for which market quotations are available are valued at the last reported sales price or official closing price on the primary market or exchange on which they trade. Debt securities are valued at the mean between the last quoted bid and asked prices provided by an independent pricing service, which are based on transactions in debt obligations, quotations from bond dealers, market transactions in comparable securities and various other relationships between securities. When reliable prices are not readily available, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded, but before the Portfolio calculates its net asset value, the Portfolio values these securities as determined in accordance with procedures approved by the Portfolio’s Board of Trustees. Short-term obligations with maturities of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
The Portfolio has adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification Topic 820 (“ASC Topic 820”). ASC Topic 820 establishes a single definition of fair value, creates a three-tier hierarchy as a framework for measuring fair value based on inputs used to value the Portfolio’s investments, and requires additional disclosure about fair value. The hierarchy of inputs is summarized below.
| Ÿ | | Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
| Ÿ | | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
| Ÿ | | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Portfolio’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 21 | |
The Portfolio uses valuation techniques to measure fair value that are consistent with the market approach and/or income approach, depending on the type of security and the particular circumstance. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable securities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to discount estimated future cash flows to present value.
The following is a summary of the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ASSETS | |
| DESCRIPTION | | Quoted Prices
(Level 1) | | | Other Significant
Observable Inputs
(Level 2) | | | Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) | | | Total | |
| Common stocks† | | $ | 137,147,227 | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 137,147,227 | |
| Short-term investments† | | | — | | | $ | 5,976,000 | | | | — | | | | 5,976,000 | |
| Total investments | | $ | 137,147,227 | | | $ | 5,976,000 | | | | — | | | $ | 143,123,227 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| LIABILITIES | |
| Description | | Quoted Prices
(Level 1) | | | Other Significant
Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | | Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3) | | | Total | |
| Other financial instruments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Written options | | $ | 7,560 | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 7,560 | |
| † | See Schedule of Investments for additional detailed categorizations. |
(b) Repurchase agreements. The Portfolio may enter into repurchase agreements with institutions that its investment adviser has determined are creditworthy. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. Under the terms of a typical repurchase agreement, the Portfolio acquires a debt security subject to an obligation of the seller to repurchase, and of the Portfolio to resell, the security at an agreed-upon price and time, thereby determining the yield during the Portfolio’s holding period. When entering into repurchase agreements, it is the Portfolio’s policy that its custodian or a third party custodian, acting on the Portfolio’s behalf, take possession of the underlying collateral securities, the market value of which, at all times, at least equals the principal amount of the repurchase transaction, including accrued interest. To the extent that any repurchase transaction maturity exceeds one business day, the value of the collateral is marked-to-market and measured against the value of the agreement in an effort to ensure the adequacy of the collateral. If the counterparty defaults, the Portfolio generally has the right to use the collateral to satisfy the terms of the repurchase transaction. However, if the market value of the collateral declines during the period in which the Portfolio seeks to assert its rights or if bankruptcy proceedings are commenced with respect to the seller of the security, realization of the collateral by the Portfolio may be delayed or limited.
(c) Written options. When the Portfolio writes an option, an amount equal to the premium received by the Portfolio is recorded as a liability, the value of which is marked-to-market daily to reflect the current market value of the option written. If the
| | |
| 22 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report |
Notes to financial statements (cont’d)
option expires, the premium received is recorded as a realized gain. When a written call option is exercised, the difference between the premium received plus the option exercise price and the Portfolio’s basis in the underlying security (in the case of a covered written call option), or the cost to purchase the underlying security (in the case of an uncovered written call option), including brokerage commission, is recognized as a realized gain or loss. When a written put option is exercised, the amount of the premium received is subtracted from the cost of the security purchased by the Portfolio from the exercise of the written put option to form the Portfolio’s basis in the underlying security purchased. The writer or buyer of an option traded on an exchange can liquidate the position before the exercise of the option by entering into a closing transaction. The cost of a closing transaction is deducted from the original premium received resulting in a realized gain or loss to the Portfolio.
The risk in writing a covered call option is that the Portfolio may forego the opportunity of profit if the market price of the underlying security increases and the option is exercised. The risk in writing a put option is that the Portfolio may incur a loss if the market price of the underlying security decreases and the option is exercised. The risk in writing an uncovered call option is that the Portfolio is exposed to the risk of loss if the market price of the underlying security increases. In addition, there is the risk that the Portfolio may not be able to enter into a closing transaction because of an illiquid secondary market.
(d) Foreign currency translation. Investment securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts based upon prevailing exchange rates on the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of investment securities and income and expense items denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts based upon prevailing exchange rates on the respective dates of such transactions.
The Portfolio does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.
Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales of foreign currencies, including gains and losses on forward foreign currency contracts, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Portfolio's books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the values of assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, on the date of valuation, resulting from changes in exchange rates.
Foreign security and currency transactions may involve certain considerations and risks not typically associated with those of U.S. dollar denominated transactions as a result of, among other factors, the possibility of lower levels of governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets and the possibility of political or economic instability.
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 23 | |
(e) Security transactions and investment income. Security transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Interest income, adjusted for amortization of premium and accretion of discount, is recorded on the accrual basis. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. The cost of investments sold is determined by use of the specific identification method. To the extent any issuer defaults or a credit event occurs that impacts the issuer, the Portfolio may halt any additional interest income accruals and consider the realizability of interest accrued up to the date of default or credit event.
(f) REIT distributions. The character of distributions received from Real Estate Investment Trusts (‘‘REITs’’) held by the Portfolio is generally comprised of net investment income, capital gains, and return of capital. It is the policy of the Portfolio to estimate the character of distributions received from underlying REITs based on historical data provided by the REITs. After each calendar year end, REITs report the actual tax character of these distributions. Differences between the estimated and actual amounts reported by the REITs are reflected in the Portfolio’s records in the year in which they are reported by the REITs by adjusting related investment cost basis, capital gains and income, as necessary.
(g) Distributions to shareholders. Distributions from net investment income and distributions of net realized gains, if any, are declared at least annually. Distributions to shareholders of the Portfolio are recorded on the ex-dividend date and are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(h) Share class accounting. Investment income, common expenses and realized/unrealized gains (losses) on investments are allocated to the various classes of the Portfolio on the basis of daily net assets of each class. Fees relating to a specific class are charged directly to that share class.
(i) Federal and other taxes. It is the Portfolio’s policy to comply with the federal income and excise tax requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"), as amended, applicable to regulated investment companies. Accordingly, the Portfolio intends to distribute its taxable income and net realized gains, if any, to shareholders in accordance with timing requirements imposed by the Code. Therefore, no federal or state income tax provision is required in the Portfolio’s financial statements.
Management has analyzed the Portfolio’s tax positions taken on income tax returns for all open tax years and has concluded that as of December 31, 2010, no provision for income tax is required in the Portfolio’s financial statements. The Portfolio’s federal and state income and federal excise tax returns for tax years for which the applicable statutes of limitations have not expired are subject to examination by Internal Revenue Service and state departments of revenue.
(j) Reclassification. GAAP requires that certain components of net assets be reclassified to reflect permanent differences between financial and tax reporting. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or net asset values per share. During the current year, the following reclassifications have been made:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Accumulated Net
Investment Loss | | | Paid-in
Capital | |
| (a) | | $ | 557,774 | | | $ | (557,774) | |
| (a) | Reclassifications are primarily due to a tax net operating loss. |
| | |
| 24 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report |
Notes to financial statements (cont’d)
(k) Counterparty risk and credit-risk-related contingent features of derivative instruments. The Portfolio may invest in certain securities or engage in other transactions, where the Portfolio is exposed to counterparty credit risk in addition to broader market risks. The Portfolio may invest in securities of issuers, which may also be considered counterparties as trading partners in other transactions. This may increase the risk of loss in the event of default or bankruptcy by the counterparty or if the counterparty otherwise fails to meet its contractual obligations. The Portfolio’s investment manager attempts to mitigate counterparty risk by (i) periodically assessing the creditworthiness of its trading partners, (ii) monitoring and/or limiting the amount of its net exposure to each individual counterparty based on its assessment and (iii) requiring collateral from the counterparty for certain transactions. Market events and changes in overall economic conditions may impact the assessment of such counterparty risk by the investment manager. In addition, declines in the values of underlying collateral received may expose the Portfolio to increased risk of loss.
The Portfolio has entered into master agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that provide for general obligations, representations, agreements, collateral, events of default or termination and credit related contingent features. The credit related contingent features include, but are not limited to, a percentage decrease in the Portfolio’s net assets or NAV over a specified period of time. If these credit related contingent features were triggered, the derivatives counterparty could terminate the positions and demand payment or require additional collateral.
As of December 31, 2010, the Portfolio held written options with credit related contingent features which had a liability position of $7,560. If a contingent feature in the Master Agreements would have been triggered, the Portfolio would have been required to pay this amount to its derivatives counterparty.
2. Investment management agreement and other transactions with affiliates
Legg Mason Partners Fund Advisor, LLC (“LMPFA”) is the Portfolio’s investment manager and ClearBridge Advisors, LLC (“ClearBridge”) is the Portfolio’s subadviser. LMPFA and ClearBridge are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Legg Mason, Inc. ("Legg Mason").
Under the investment management agreement, the Portfolio pays an investment management fee, calculated daily and paid monthly, at an annual rate of 0.75% of the Portfolio's average daily net assets.
LMPFA provides administrative and certain oversight services to the Portfolio. LMPFA delegates to the subadviser the day-to-day portfolio management of the Portfolio, except for the management of cash and short-term instruments. For its services, LMPFA pays ClearBridge 70% of the net management fee it receives from the Portfolio.
As a result of an expense limitation arrangement between the Portfolio and LMPFA, the ratio of expenses, other than brokerage, interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses and acquired fund fees and expenses, to average net assets of Class I and Class II
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 25 | |
shares did not exceed 1.00% and 1.25%, respectively. This expense limitation arrangement cannot be terminated prior to December 31, 2012 without the Board of Trustees’ consent.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, fees waived and/or expenses reimbursed amounted to $579.
The manager is permitted to recapture amounts previously forgone or reimbursed to a class during the same fiscal year if the class’ total annual operating expenses have fallen to a level below the expense limitation (“expense cap”) in effect at the time the fees were earned or the expense incurred. In no case will the manager recapture any amount that would result, on any particular business day of the Portfolio, in the class’ total annual operating expenses exceeding the expense cap or any other lower limit then in effect.
Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC, a wholly-owned broker-dealer subsidiary of Legg Mason, serves as the Portfolio’s sole and exclusive distributor.
All officers and one Trustee of the Trust are employees of Legg Mason or its affiliates and do not receive compensation from the Trust.
3. Investments
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of investments (excluding short-term investments) were as follows:
| | | | |
| Purchases | | $ | 39,501,122 | |
| Sales | | | 44,615,431 | |
At December 31, 2010, the aggregate gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
| | | | |
| Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 37,956,465 | |
| Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (8,889,422) | |
| Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 29,067,043 | |
During the year ended December 31, 2010, written option transactions for the Portfolio were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Number of Contracts | | | Premiums | |
| Written options, outstanding December 31, 2009 | | | — | | | | — | |
| Options written | | | 3,395 | | | $ | 505,885 | |
| Options closed | | | (622) | | | | (133,101) | |
| Options exercised | | | (1,547) | | | | (242,695) | |
| Options expired | | | (1,118) | | | | (122,637) | |
| Written options, outstanding December 31, 2010 | | | 108 | | | $ | 7,452 | |
4. Derivative instruments and hedging activities
Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification Topic 815 requires enhanced disclosure about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities.
| | |
| 26 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report |
Notes to financial statements (cont’d)
Below is a table, grouped by derivative type that provides information about the fair value and the location of derivatives within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities at December 31, 2010.
| | | | |
| LIABILITY DERIVATIVES1 | |
| | | Equity Contracts Risk | |
| Written options | | $ | 7,560 | |
| 1 | Generally, the balance sheet location for liability derivatives is payables/net unrealized appreciation (depreciation). |
The following table provides information about the effect of derivatives and hedging activities on the Portfolio's Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2010. The table provides additional detail about the amounts and sources of gains (losses) realized on derivatives during the period.
| | | | |
| AMOUNT OF REALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON DERIVATIVES RECOGNIZED | |
| | | Equity
Contracts Risk | |
| Written options | | $ | 473,582 | |
| | | | |
CHANGE IN UNREALIZED APPRECIATION (DEPRECIATION) ON DERIVATIVES RECOGNIZED | |
| | | Equity
Contracts Risk | |
| Written options | | $ | (108) | |
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the volume of derivative activity for the Portfolio was as follows:
| | | | |
| | | Average
Market Value | |
| Written options | | $ | 49,300 | |
5. Class specific expenses, waivers and/or reimbursements
The Portfolio has adopted a Rule 12b-1 distribution plan and under that plan the Portfolio pays a distribution fee with respect to its Class II shares calculated at the annual rate of 0.25% of the average daily net assets of Class II. Distribution fees are accrued daily and paid monthly.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, class specific expenses were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Distribution
Fees | | | Transfer Agent
Fees | |
| Class I | | | — | | | $ | 8,639 | |
| Class II | | $ | 1,148 | | | | 996 | |
| Total | | $ | 1,148 | | | $ | 9,635 | |
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 27 | |
For the year ended December 31, 2010, waivers and/or reimbursements by class were as follows:
| | | | |
| | | Waivers/
Reimbursements | |
| Class I | | | — | |
| Class II | | $ | 579 | |
| Total | | $ | 579 | |
6. Shares of beneficial interest
At December 31, 2010, the Trust had an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest authorized with a par value of $0.00001 per share. The Portfolio has the ability to issue multiple classes of shares. Each class of shares represents an identical interest and has the same rights, except that each class bears certain direct expenses, including those specifically related to the distribution of its shares.
Transactions in shares of each class were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended
December 31, 2010 | | | Year Ended
December 31, 2009 | |
| | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
| Class I | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares sold | | | 1,546,284 | | | $ | 21,232,065 | | | | 1,698,527 | | | $ | 16,982,216 | |
| Shares repurchased | | | (1,899,540) | | | | (24,793,798) | | | | (2,036,117) | | | | (19,800,635) | |
| Net decrease | | | (353,256) | | | $ | (3,561,733) | | | | (337,590) | | | $ | (2,818,419) | |
| | | | |
| Class II | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Shares sold | | | 77,538 | | | $ | 1,019,780 | | | | 11,656 | | | $ | 124,701 | |
| Shares repurchased | | | (23,894) | | | | (307,619) | | | | (10,898) | | | | (111,487) | |
| Net increase | | | 53,644 | | | $ | 712,161 | | | | 758 | | | $ | 13,214 | �� |
7. Income tax information and distributions to shareholders
As of December 31, 2010, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | |
| Capital loss carryforward* | | $ | (3,252,653) | |
| Other book/tax temporary differences(a) | | | (65,236) | |
| Unrealized appreciation depreciation(b) | | | 29,066,919 | |
| Total accumulated earnings (losses) — net | | $ | 25,749,030 | |
| * | During the taxable year ended December 31, 2010, the Portfolio utilized $11,875,709 of its capital loss carryover available from prior years. As of December 31, 2010, the Portfolio had the following net capital loss carryforward remaining: |
| | | | |
| Year of Expiration | | Amount | |
| 12/31/2017 | | $ | (3,252,653 | ) |
This amount will be available to offset any future taxable capital gains. Under the recently enacted Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, the Fund will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those future years will be required to be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years. As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryforwards may be more likely to expire unused. Additionally, post-enactment capital losses that are carried forward will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered all short-term as under previous law.
| | |
| 28 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report |
Notes to financial statements (cont’d)
| (a) | Other book/tax temporary differences are attributable primarily to the book/tax differences in the timing of the deductibility of various expenses. |
| (b) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable primarily to the tax deferral of losses on wash sales and the realization for tax purposes of unrealized gains on investments in passive foreign investment companies. |
8. Regulatory matters
On May 31, 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued an order in connection with the settlement of an administrative proceeding against Smith Barney Fund Management LLC (“SBFM”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Legg Mason and the then investment adviser or manager to the Portfolio, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGM”), a former distributor of the Portfolio, relating to the appointment of an affiliated transfer agent for the Smith Barney family of mutual funds, including the Portfolio (the “Affected Funds”).
The SEC order found that SBFM and CGM willfully violated Section 206(1) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and the rules promulgated there under (the “Advisers Act”). Specifically, the order found that SBFM and CGM knowingly or recklessly failed to disclose to the boards of the Affected Funds in 1999 when proposing a new transfer agent arrangement with an affiliated transfer agent that: First Data Investors Services Group (“First Data”), the Affected Funds’ then- existing transfer agent, had offered to continue as transfer agent and do the same work for substantially less money than before; and that Citigroup Asset Management (“CAM”), the Citigroup business unit that, at the time, included the Affected Funds’ investment manager and other investment advisory companies, had entered into a side letter with First Data under which CAM agreed to recommend the appointment of First Data as sub-transfer agent to the affiliated transfer agent in exchange for, among other things, a guarantee by First Data of specified amounts of asset management and investment banking fees to CAM and CGM. The order also found that SBFM and CGM willfully violated Section 206(2) of the Advisers Act by virtue of the omissions discussed above and other misrepresentations and omissions in the materials provided to the Affected Funds’ boards, including the failure to make clear that the affiliated transfer agent would earn a high profit for performing limited functions while First Data continued to perform almost all of the transfer agent functions, and the suggestion that the proposed arrangement was in the Affected Funds’ best interests and that no viable alternatives existed.
SBFM and CGM do not admit or deny any wrongdoing or liability. The settlement does not establish wrongdoing or liability for purposes of any other proceeding. The SEC censured SBFM and CGM and ordered them to cease and desist from violations of Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Advisers Act. The order required Citigroup to pay $208.1 million, including $109 million in disgorgement of profits, $19.1 million in interest, and a civil money penalty of $80 million. Approximately $24.4 million has already been paid to the Affected Funds, primarily through fee waivers. The remaining $183.7 million, including the penalty, has been paid to the U.S. Treasury and will be distributed pursuant to a plan submitted for the approval of the SEC. The order also required that transfer agency fees received from the Affected Funds since December 1, 2004, less certain expenses, be placed in escrow and provided that a portion of such fees might be subsequently distributed in accordance with the terms
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 29 | |
of the order. On April 3, 2006, an aggregate amount of approximately $9 million held in escrow was distributed to the Affected Funds.
The order required SBFM to recommend a new transfer agent contract to the Affected Funds’ boards within 180 days of the entry of the order; if a Citigroup affiliate submitted a proposal to serve as transfer agent or sub-transfer agent, SBFM and CGM would have been required, at their expense, to engage an independent monitor to oversee a competitive bidding process. On November 21, 2005, and within the specified timeframe, the Affected Funds’ boards selected a new transfer agent for the Affected Funds. No Citigroup affiliate submitted a proposal to serve as transfer agent. Under the order, SBFM also must comply with an amended version of a vendor policy that Citigroup instituted in August 2004.
Although there can be no assurance, LMPFA does not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Affected Funds.
On December 1, 2005, Citigroup completed the sale of substantially all of its global asset management business, including SBFM, to Legg Mason.
On May 12, 2010, the SEC approved the disbursement of approximately $108.6 million previously paid to the U.S. Treasury, reflecting the disgorgement of Citigroup’s profits, plus interest. On May 26, 2010, these amounts were disbursed to the Affected Funds pursuant to a Plan of Distribution approved by the SEC. The Portfolio has received $4,799 for Class I, related to this distribution. All other amounts not previously distributed were retained by the U.S. Treasury.
9. Legal matters
Beginning in May 2004, class action lawsuits alleging violations of the federal securities laws were filed against CGM, a former distributor of the Portfolio, and other affiliated funds (collectively, the “Funds”) and a number of its then affiliates, including SBFM and Salomon Brothers Asset Management Inc. (“SBAM”), which were then investment adviser or manager to certain of the Funds (the “Managers”), substantially all of the mutual funds then managed by the Managers (the “Defendant Funds”), and Board members of the Defendant Funds (collectively, the “Defendants”). The complaints alleged, among other things, that CGM created various undisclosed incentives for its brokers to sell Smith Barney and Salomon Brothers funds. In addition, according to the complaints, the Managers caused the Defendant Funds to pay excessive brokerage commissions to CGM for steering clients towards proprietary funds. The complaints also alleged that the Defendants breached their fiduciary duty to the Defendant Funds by improperly charging Rule 12b-1 fees and by drawing on fund assets to make undisclosed payments of soft dollars and excessive brokerage commissions. The complaints also alleged that the Defendant Funds failed to adequately disclose certain of the allegedly wrongful conduct. The complaints sought injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages, rescission of the Defendant Funds’ contracts with the Managers, recovery of all fees paid to the Managers pursuant to such contracts and an award of attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses.
On December 15, 2004, a consolidated amended complaint (the “Complaint”) was filed alleging substantially similar causes of action. On May 27, 2005, all of the
| | |
| 30 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report |
Notes to financial statements (cont’d)
Defendants filed motions to dismiss the Complaint. On July 26, 2006, the court issued a decision and order (1) finding that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue on behalf of the shareholders of the Funds in which none of the plaintiffs had invested and dismissing those Funds from the case (although stating that they could be brought back into the case if standing as to them could be established), and (2) other than one stayed claim, dismissing all of the causes of action against the remaining Defendants, with prejudice, except for the cause of action under Section 36(b) of the 1940 Act, which the court granted plaintiffs leave to replead as a derivative claim.
On October 16, 2006, plaintiffs filed their Second Consolidated Amended Complaint (“Second Amended Complaint”) which alleges derivative claims on behalf of nine funds identified in the Second Amended Complaint, under Section 36(b) of the 1940 Act, against CAM, SBAM and SBFM as investment advisers to the identified funds, as well as CGM as a distributor for the identified funds (collectively, the “Second Amended Complaint Defendants”). The Portfolio was not identified in the Second Amended Complaint. The Second Amended Complaint alleges no claims against any of the funds or any of their Board Members. Under Section 36(b), the Second Amended Complaint alleges similar facts and seeks similar relief against the Second Amended Complaint Defendants as the Complaint.
On December 3, 2007, the court granted the Defendants’ motion to dismiss, with prejudice. On January 2, 2008, the plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The appeal was fully briefed and oral argument before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit took place on March 5, 2009. The parties currently are awaiting a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Additional lawsuits arising out of these circumstances and presenting similar allegations and requests for relief may be filed in the future.
10. Other tax information
On December 22, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”). The Act updates certain tax rules applicable to regulated investment companies (“RICs”). The various provisions of the Act will generally be effective for RICs with taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010. Additional information regarding the impact of the Act on the Portfolio, if any, will be contained within the relevant sections of the notes to the financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio 2010 Annual Report | | | 31 | |
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
The Board of Trustees and Shareholders
Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio, a series of Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust, including the schedule of investments, as of December 31, 2010, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2010, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers or by other appropriate auditing procedures. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio as of December 31, 2010, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
New York, New York
February 15, 2011
| | |
| 32 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio |
Board approval of management and subadvisory agreements (unaudited)
At a meeting of the Trust’s Board of Trustees, the Board considered the re-approval for an annual period of the management agreement of Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio (the “Fund”), pursuant to which Legg Mason Partners Fund Advisor, LLC (the “Manager”) provides the Fund with investment advisory and administrative services, and the Fund’s sub-advisory agreement, pursuant to which ClearBridge Advisors, LLC (the “Sub-Adviser”) provides day-to-day management of the Fund’s portfolio. (The management agreement and sub-advisory agreement are collectively referred to as the “Agreements.”) The Manager and the Sub-Adviser are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Legg Mason, Inc. The Trustees who are not “interested persons” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Independent Trustees”)) of the Fund were assisted in their review by Fund counsel and independent legal counsel and met with independent legal counsel in executive sessions separate from representatives of the Manager and the Sub-Adviser. The Independent Trustees requested and received information from the Manager and the Sub-Adviser they deemed reasonably necessary for their review of the Agreements and the performance of the Manager and the Sub-Adviser. Included was information about the Manager, the Sub-Adviser and the Fund’s distributor, as well as the management, sub-advisory and distribution arrangements for the Fund and other funds overseen by the Board. This information was initially reviewed by a special committee of the Independent Trustees and then by the full Board.
In voting to approve the Agreements, the Independent Trustees considered whether the approval of the Agreements would be in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders, an evaluation based on several factors including those discussed below.
Nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the fund under the management agreement and sub-advisory agreement
The Board received and considered information regarding the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by the Manager and the Sub-Adviser under the Management Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement, respectively, during the past year. The Trustees also considered the Manager’s supervisory activities over the Sub-Adviser. In addition, the Independent Trustees received and considered other information regarding the administrative and other services rendered to the Fund and its shareholders by the Manager. The Board noted information received at regular meetings throughout the year related to the services rendered by the Manager in its management of the Fund’s affairs, including the management of cash and short-term instruments, and the Manager’s role in coordinating the activities of the Sub-Adviser and the Fund’s other service providers. The Board’s evaluation of the services provided by the Manager and the Sub-Adviser took into account the Board’s knowledge and familiarity gained as Trustees of funds in the Legg Mason fund complex, including the scope and quality of the investment management and other capabilities of the Manager and the Sub-Adviser and the quality of the Manager’s administrative and other services. The Board observed that the scope of services provided by the Manager had expanded over time as a result of regulatory and other developments, including maintaining and monitoring its own and the
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio | | | 33 | |
Fund’s compliance programs. The Board reviewed information received from the Manager and the Fund’s Chief Compliance Officer regarding the Fund’s compliance policies and procedures established pursuant to Rule 38a-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
The Board reviewed the qualifications, backgrounds and responsibilities of the Fund’s senior personnel and the portfolio management team primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the Fund. The Board considered the degree to which the Manager implemented organizational changes to improve investment results and the services provided to the Legg Mason fund complex. The Board also considered, based on its knowledge of the Manager and the Manager’s affiliates, the financial resources available to the Manager’s parent organization, Legg Mason, Inc.
The Board also considered the division of responsibilities between the Manager and the Sub-Adviser and the oversight provided by the Manager. The Board also considered the Manager’s and the Sub-Adviser’s brokerage policies and practices, the standards applied in seeking best execution, the Manager’s policies and practices regarding soft dollars, and the existence of quality controls applicable to brokerage allocation procedures. In addition, management also reported to the Board on, among other things, its business plans, recent organizational changes, portfolio manager compensation plan and policy regarding portfolio managers’ ownership of fund shares.
The Board concluded that, overall, it was satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) under the respective Agreement by the Manager and the Sub-Adviser.
Fund performance
The Board received and reviewed performance information for the Fund and for all small-cap growth funds underlying variable insurance products (the “Performance Universe”) selected by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data. The Board was provided with a description of the methodology Lipper used to determine the similarity of the Fund with the funds included in the Performance Universe. The Trustees noted that they also had received and discussed with management information at periodic intervals comparing the Fund’s performance to that of its benchmark index. The information comparing the Fund’s performance to that of the Performance Universe was for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended June 30, 2010. The Fund performed better than the median for three- and ten-year periods, but below the median for the one- and five-year periods. The Board also reviewed performance information provided by the Manager for periods ended September 30, 2010, which showed that the Fund’s performance had improved and was better than the Lipper category average during the third quarter. The Trustees then discussed with representatives of management the portfolio management strategy of the Fund’s portfolio managers. The Trustees noted that the Manager and Sub-Adviser were committed to providing the resources necessary to assist the Fund’s portfolio managers and continue to improve Fund performance. Based on its review, the Board generally was satisfied
| | |
| 34 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio |
Board approval of management and
subadvisory agreements (unaudited) (cont’d)
with the Fund’s long-term performance and management’s efforts to improve performance going forward, which was reflected in the Fund’s performance for the third quarter ended September 30, 2010. The Board determined to continue to evaluate the Fund’s performance and directed the Independent Trustees’ performance committee to continue to periodically review Fund performance with the Manager and report to the full Board during periods between Board meetings.
Management fees and expense ratios
The Board reviewed and considered, the contractual management fee (the “Contractual Management Fee”) payable by the Fund to the Manager in light of the nature, extent and quality of the management and sub-advisory services provided by the Manager and the Sub-Adviser, respectively. The Board noted that the Manager, and not the Fund, pays the sub-advisory fee to the Sub-Adviser and, accordingly, that the retention of the Sub-Adviser does not increase the fees and expenses incurred by the Fund.
The Board also reviewed information regarding the fees the Manager and the Sub-Adviser charged any of their U.S. clients investing primarily in an asset class similar to that of the Fund including, where applicable, institutional separate and commingled accounts and retail managed accounts. The Manager reviewed with the Board the significant differences in the scope of services provided to the Fund and to such other clients, noting that the Fund is provided with regulatory compliance and administrative services, office facilities and Fund officers (including the Fund’s chief financial, chief legal and chief compliance officers), and that the Manager coordinates and oversees the provision of services to the Fund by other fund service providers, including the Sub-Adviser. The Board considered the fee comparisons in light of the scope of services required to manage these different types of accounts.
The Board received an analysis of complex-wide management fees provided by the Manager, which, among other things, set out a framework of fees based on asset classes. Management also discussed with the Board the Fund’s distribution arrangements, including how amounts received by the Fund’s distributor are expended, and the fees received and expenses incurred in connection with such arrangements by affiliates of the Manager.
Additionally, the Board received and considered information comparing the Fund’s Contractual Management Fee and the Fund’s overall expense ratio with those of a group of 13 small-cap growth funds underlying variable insurance products selected by Lipper as comparable to the Fund (the “Expense Group”), and a broader group of funds selected by Lipper consisting of all small-cap growth funds underlying variable insurance products (the “Expense Universe”). This information showed that the Fund’s Contractual Management Fee were lower than the median of management fees paid by the other funds in the Expense Group and lower than the average management fee paid by the other funds in the Expense Universe, and that the Fund’s actual total expense ratio was lower than the median of the total expense ratios of the funds in the Expense Group and lower than the average total expense ratio of the funds in the Expense Universe.
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio | | | 35 | |
Manager profitability
The Board received and considered a profitability analysis of the Manager and its affiliates in providing services to the Fund. The Board also received profitability information with respect to the Legg Mason fund complex as a whole. In addition, the Board received information with respect to the Manager’s allocation methodologies used in preparing this profitability data as well as a report from an outside consultant that had reviewed the Manager’s methodology. The Board also noted the profitability percentage ranges determined by appropriate court cases to be reasonable given the services rendered to investment companies. The Board determined that the Manager’s profitability was not excessive in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Fund.
Economies of scale
The Board received and considered information regarding whether there have been economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund as the Fund’s assets grow, whether the Fund has appropriately benefited from any economies of scale, and whether there is potential for realization of any further economies of scale. The Board considered whether economies of scale in the provision of services to the Fund were being passed along to the shareholders.
The Board noted that to the extent the Fund’s assets increase over time, the Fund and its shareholders should realize economies of scale as certain expenses, such as fixed fund fees, become a smaller percentage of overall assets. The Board also noted that it appeared that the benefits of any economies of scale also would be appropriately shared with shareholders through increased investment in fund management and administration resources.
Taking all of the above into consideration, the Board determined that the management fee was reasonable in light of the comparative performance and expense information and the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Fund under the Agreements.
Other benefits to the manager
The Board considered other benefits received by the Manager and its affiliates, including the Sub-Adviser, as a result of the Manager’s relationship with the Fund, including the opportunity to offer additional products and services to Fund shareholders.
In light of the costs of providing investment management and other services to the Fund and the Manager’s ongoing commitment to the Fund, the profits and other ancillary benefits that the Manager and its affiliates received were considered reasonable.
Based on their discussions and considerations, including those described above, the Trustees approved the Management Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement to continue for another year.
No single factor reviewed by the Board was identified by the Board as the principal factor in determining whether to approve the Management Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement.
| | |
| 36 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio |
Additional information (unaudited)
Information about Trustees and Officers
The business and affairs of Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio (the “Portfolio”) are conducted by management under the supervision and subject to the direction of its Board of Trustees. The business address of each Trustee is c/o R. Jay Gerken, 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10018. Information pertaining to the Trustees and officers of the Portfolio is set forth below.
The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about Trustees and is available, without charge, upon request by calling the Portfolio at 1-877-721-1926.
| | |
| Independent Trustees†: |
| Paul R. Ades |
| Year of birth | | 1940 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Trustee |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 1983 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | Paul R. Ades, PLLC (law firm) (since 2000) |
Number of funds in fund complex overseen
by Trustee | | 53 |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | | None |
| Andrew L. Breech |
| Year of birth | | 1952 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Trustee |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 1991 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | President, Dealer Operating Control Service, Inc. (automotive retail management) (since 1985) |
Number of funds in fund complex overseen
by Trustee | | 53 |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | | None |
| Dwight B. Crane |
| Year of birth | | 1937 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Trustee |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 1981 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | Professor Emeritus, Harvard Business School (since 2007); formerly, Professor, Harvard Business School (1969 to 2007); Independent Consultant (since 1969) |
Number of funds in fund complex overseen
by Trustee | | 53 |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | | None |
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio | | | 37 | |
| | |
| Independent Trustees cont’d |
| Frank G. Hubbard |
| Year of birth | | 1937 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Trustee |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 1993 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | President, Avatar International Inc. (business development) (since 1998) |
Number of funds in fund complex overseen
by Trustee | | 53 |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | | None |
| Howard J. Johnson |
| Year of birth | | 1938 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Trustee |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | From 1981 to 1998 and since 2000 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | Chief Executive Officer, Genesis Imaging LLC (technology company) (since 2003) |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | | 53 |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | | None |
| David E. Maryatt |
| Year of birth | | 1936 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Trustee |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 1983 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | Private Investor; President and Director, ALS Co. (real estate management and development firm) (since 1992) |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | | 53 |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | | None |
| Jerome H. Miller |
| Year of birth | | 1938 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Trustee |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 1995 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | Retired |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | | 53 |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | | None |
| | |
| 38 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio |
Additional information (unaudited) (cont’d)
Information about Trustees and Officers
| | |
| Independent Trustees cont’d |
| Ken Miller |
| Year of birth | | 1942 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Trustee |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 1983 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | President, Young Stuff Apparel Group, Inc. (apparel manufacturer), division of Li & Fung (since 1963) |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | | 53 |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | | None |
| John J. Murphy |
| Year of birth | | 1944 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Trustee |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 2002 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | Founder and Senior Principal, Murphy Capital Management (investment management) (since 1983) |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | | 53 |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | | Trustee, UBS Funds (52 funds) (since 2008); Director, Nicholas Applegate Institutional Funds (12 funds) (since 2005); Trustee, Consulting Group Capital Markets Funds (11 funds) (since 2002); formerly, Director, Atlantic Stewardship Bank (2004 to 2005); formerly, Director, Barclays International Funds Group Ltd. and affiliated companies (1983 to 2003) |
| Thomas F. Schlafly |
| Year of birth | | 1948 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Trustee |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 1983 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | President, The Saint Louis Brewery, Inc. (brewery) (since 1989); Partner, Thompson Coburn LLP (law firm) (since 2009); formerly, Of Counsel, Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP (law firm) and its predecessor firms (1984 to 2009) |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | | 53 |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | | Director, Citizens National Bank of Greater St. Louis (since 2006) |
| Jerry A. Viscione |
| Year of birth | | 1944 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Trustee |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 1993 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | Retired |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | | 53 |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | | None |
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio | | | 39 | |
| | |
| Interested Trustee and Officer: | | |
| R. Jay Gerken, CFA3 | | |
| Year of birth | | 1951 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Trustee, President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 2002 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | Managing Director of Legg Mason & Co., LLC (“Legg Mason & Co.”) (since 2005); Officer and Trustee/Director of 149 funds associated with Legg Mason Partners Fund Advisor, LLC (“LMPFA”) or its affiliates (since 2006) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2006); President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of LMPFA (since 2006); President and CEO of Smith Barney Fund Management LLC (“SBFM”) and Citi Fund Management, Inc. (“CFM”) (formerly registered investment advisers) (since 2002); formerly, Chairman, President and CEO, Travelers Investment Adviser Inc. (prior to 2005) |
| Number of funds in fund complex overseen by Trustee | | 136 |
| Other board memberships held by Trustee during past five years | | Former Trustee, Consulting Group Capital Markets Funds (11 funds) (prior to 2006) |
| Additional Officers | | |
Ted P. Becker Legg Mason 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018 | | |
| Year of birth | | 1951 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Chief Compliance Officer |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 2007 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | Director of Global Compliance at Legg Mason (since 2006); Chief Compliance Officer of LMPFA (since 2006); Managing Director of Compliance of Legg Mason & Co. (since 2005); Chief Compliance Officer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (since 2006) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2006) |
John Chiota Legg Mason 100 First Stamford Place, Stamford, CT 06902 | | |
| Year of birth | | 1968 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Chief Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer and Identity Theft Prevention Officer |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 2007 and 2008 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | Identity Theft Prevention Officer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (since 2008); Chief Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (since 2006); Vice President of Legg Mason & Co. (since 2006) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2006); formerly, Chief Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer of TD Waterhouse (prior to 2004) |
| | |
| 40 | | Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio |
Additional information (unaudited) (cont’d)
Information about Trustees and Officers
| | |
| Additional Officers cont’d | | |
Robert I. Frenkel Legg Mason 100 First Stamford Place, Stamford, CT 06902 | | |
| Year of birth | | 1954 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 2007 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of Legg Mason (since 2006); Managing Director and General Counsel of Global Mutual Funds for Legg Mason & Co. (since 2006) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (since 1994); Secretary and Chief Legal Officer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (since 2006) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2006) |
Thomas C. Mandia Legg Mason 100 First Stamford Place, Stamford, CT 06902 | | |
| Year of birth | | 1962 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Assistant Secretary |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 2007 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | Managing Director and Deputy General Counsel of Legg Mason & Co. (since 2005) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2005); Secretary of LMPFA (since 2006); Assistant Secretary of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (since 2006) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2006); Secretary to SBFM and CFM (since 2002) |
Kaprel Ozsolak Legg Mason 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041 | | |
| Year of birth | | 1965 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Chief Financial Officer |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 2007 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | Director of Legg Mason & Co. (since 2005); Chief Financial Officer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (since 2007) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2007); formerly, Treasurer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (prior to 2010) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2005); formerly, Controller of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2004) |
| | | | |
| Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio | | | 41 | |
| | |
| Additional Officers cont’d | | |
Albert Laskaj Legg Mason 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041 | | |
| Year of birth | | 1977 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Treasurer |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 2010 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | Vice President of Legg Mason & Co. (since 2008); Treasurer of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (since 2010); formerly, Controller of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (prior to 2010); formerly, Assistant Controller of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (prior to 2007); formerly, Accounting Manager of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2005) |
Jeanne M. Kelly Legg Mason 620 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018 | | |
| Year of birth | | 1951 |
| Position(s) with Trust | | Senior Vice President |
| Term of office1 and length of time served2 | | Since 2007 |
| Principal occupation(s) during past five years | | Senior Vice President of certain mutual funds associated with Legg Mason & Co. or its affiliates (since 2007); Senior Vice President of LMPFA (since 2006); Managing Director of Legg Mason & Co. (since 2005) and Legg Mason & Co. predecessors (prior to 2005) |
| † | Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Portfolio within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. |
| 1 | Each Trustee and officer serves until his or her respective successor has been duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal. |
| 2 | Indicates the earliest year in which the Trustee became a board member for a fund in the Legg Mason fund complex or the officer took such office. |
| 3 | Mr. Gerken is an “interested person” of the Portfolio, as defined in the 1940 Act, because of his position with LMPFA and/or certain of its affiliates. |
Legg Mason ClearBridge
Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio
Trustees
Paul R. Ades
Andrew L. Breech
Dwight B. Crane
R. Jay Gerken, CFA Chairman
Frank G. Hubbard
Howard J. Johnson
David E. Maryatt
Jerome H. Miller
Ken Miller
John J. Murphy
Thomas F. Schlafly
Jerry A. Viscione
Investment manager
Legg Mason Partners Fund Advisor, LLC
Subadviser
ClearBridge Advisors, LLC
Distributor
Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
Transfer agent
Boston Financial Data Services, Inc.
2000 Crown Colony Drive
Quincy, MA 02169
Independent registered public accounting firm
KPMG LLP 345 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10154
Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio
The Portfolio is a separate investment series of Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust, a Maryland statutory trust.
Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio
Legg Mason Funds
55 Water Street
New York, NY 10041
The Portfolio files its complete schedules of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Portfolio’s Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The Portfolio’s Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C., and information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. To obtain information on Form N-Q, shareholders can call the Portfolio at 1-877-721-1926.
Information on how the Portfolio voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the prior 12-month period ended June 30th of each year and a description of the policies and procedures that the Portfolio uses to determine how to vote proxies related to portfolio transactions are available (1) without charge, upon request, by calling the Portfolio at 1-877-721-1926, (2) on the Portfolio’s website at www.leggmason.com/individualinvestors and (3) on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
This report is submitted for general information of the shareholders of Legg Mason ClearBridge Variable Small Cap Growth Portfolio. This report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Portfolio unless preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
Investors should consider the Portfolio’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the Portfolio. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing.
www.leggmason.com/individualinvestors
©2011 Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC
Member FINRA, SIPC
Privacy policy
We are committed to keeping nonpublic personal information about you secure and confidential. This notice is intended to help you understand how we fulfill this commitment. From time to time, we may collect a variety of personal information about you, including:
| Ÿ | | Information we receive from you on applications and forms, via the telephone and through our websites; |
| Ÿ | | Information about your transactions with us, our affiliates or others (such as your purchases, sales or account balances); and |
| Ÿ | | Information we receive from consumer reporting agencies. |
We do not disclose nonpublic personal information about our customers or former customers, except to our affiliates (such as broker-dealers or investment advisers within the Legg Mason family of companies) or as is otherwise permitted by applicable law or regulation. For example, we may share this information with others in order to process your transactions or service an account. We may also provide this information to companies that perform marketing services on our behalf, such as printing and mailing, or to other financial institutions with whom we have joint marketing agreements. When we enter into such agreements, we will require these companies to protect the confidentiality of this information and to use it only to perform the services for which we hired them.
With respect to our internal security procedures, we maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your nonpublic personal information, and we restrict access to this information.
If you decide at some point either to close your account(s) or become an inactive customer, we will continue to adhere to our privacy policies and practices with respect to your nonpublic personal information.
|
| NOT PART OF THE ANNUAL REPORT |
www.leggmason.com/individualinvestors
©2011 Legg Mason Investor Services, LLC Member FINRA, SIPC
FD04119 2/11 SR11-1283
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller.
| ITEM 3. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT. |
The Board of Directors of the registrant has determined that Jerry A. Viscione possesses the technical attributes identified in Instruction 2(b) of Item 3 to Form N-CSR to qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,” and has designated Mr. Viscione as the Audit Committee’s financial expert. Mr. Viscione is an “independent” Director pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Item 3 to Form N-CSR.
| ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. |
a) Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the previous fiscal years ending December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010 (the “Reporting Periods”) for professional services rendered by the Registrant’s principal accountant (the “Auditor”) for the audit of the Registrant’s annual financial statements, or services that are normally provided by the Auditor in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the Reporting Periods, were $414,700 in December 31, 2009, $301,400 in December 31, 2010.
b) Audit-Related Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Period for assurance and related services by the Auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the Registrant’s financial statements were $1,427 in December 31, 2009 and $0 in December 31, 2010. These services consisted of procedures performed in connection with the Re-domiciliation of the various reviews of Prospectus supplements, and consent issuances related to the N-1A filings for the Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust.
In addition, there were no Audit-Related Fees billed in the Reporting Period for assurance and related services by the Auditor to the Registrant’s investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust (“service affiliates”), that were reasonably related to the performance of the annual audit of the service affiliates.
(c) Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for professional services rendered by the Auditor for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning (“Tax Services”) were $43,200 in December 31, 2009 and $57,600 in December 31, 2010. These services consisted of (i) review or preparation of U.S. federal, state, local and excise tax returns; (ii) U.S. federal, state and local tax planning, advice and assistance regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments, and (iii) tax advice regarding tax qualification matters and/or treatment of various financial instruments held or proposed to be acquired or held.
There were no fees billed for tax services by the Auditors to service affiliates during the Reporting Periods that required pre-approval by the Audit Committee.
d) All Other Fees. There were no other fees billed in the Reporting Periods for products and services provided by the Auditor, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item for the Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust.
All Other Fees. There were no other non-audit services rendered by the Auditor to Legg Mason Partners Fund Advisors, LLC (“LMPFA”), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under
common control with LMPFA that provided ongoing services to Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust requiring pre-approval by the Audit Committee in the Reporting Period.
(e) Audit Committee’s pre-approval policies and procedures described in paragraph (c) (7) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(1) The Charter for the Audit Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of each registered investment company (the “Fund”) advised by LMPFA or one of their affiliates (each, an “Adviser”) requires that the Committee shall approve (a) all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided to the Fund and (b) all permissible non-audit services to be provided by the Fund’s independent auditors to the Adviser and any Covered Service Providers if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund. The Committee may implement policies and procedures by which such services are approved other than by the full Committee.
The Committee shall not approve non-audit services that the Committee believes may impair the independence of the auditors. As of the date of the approval of this Audit Committee Charter, permissible non-audit services include any professional services (including tax services), that are not prohibited services as described below, provided to the Fund by the independent auditors, other than those provided to the Fund in connection with an audit or a review of the financial statements of the Fund. Permissible non-audit services may not include: (i) bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the Fund; (ii) financial information systems design and implementation; (iii) appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports; (iv) actuarial services; (v) internal audit outsourcing services; (vi) management functions or human resources; (vii) broker or dealer, investment adviser or investment banking services; (viii) legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit; and (ix) any other service the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board determines, by regulation, is impermissible.
Pre-approval by the Committee of any permissible non-audit services is not required so long as: (i) the aggregate amount of all such permissible non-audit services provided to the Fund, the Adviser and any service providers controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provide ongoing services to the Fund (“Covered Service Providers”) constitutes not more than 5% of the total amount of revenues paid to the independent auditors during the fiscal year in which the permissible non-audit services are provided to (a) the Fund, (b) the Adviser and (c) any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund during the fiscal year in which the services are provided that would have to be approved by the Committee; (ii) the permissible non-audit services were not recognized by the Fund at the time of the engagement to be non-audit services; and (iii) such services are promptly brought to the attention of the Committee and approved by the Committee (or its delegate(s)) prior to the completion of the audit.
(2) For the Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust, the percentage of fees that were approved by the audit committee, with respect to: Audit-Related Fees were 100% and 100% for December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010; Tax Fees were 100% and 100% for December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010; and Other Fees were 100% and 100% for December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010.
(f) N/A
(g) Non-audit fees billed by the Auditor for services rendered to Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust, LMPFA and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with LMPFA that provides ongoing services to Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust during the reporting period were $0 in 2010.
(h) Yes. Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust’s Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to Service Affiliates, which were not pre-approved (not requiring pre-approval), is compatible with maintaining the Accountant’s independence. All
services provided by the Auditor to the Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust or to Service Affiliates, which were required to be pre-approved, were pre-approved as required.
| ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS. |
a) The independent board members are acting as the registrant’s audit committee as specified in Section 3(a)(58)(B) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee consists of the following Board members:
Paul R. Ades
Andrew L. Breech
Dwight B. Crane
Frank G. Hubbard
Howard J. Johnson
David E. Maryatt
Jerome H. Miller
Ken Miller
John J. Murphy
Thomas F. Schlafly
Jerry A. Viscione
b) Not applicable.
| ITEM 6. | SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS. |
Included herein under Item 1.
| ITEM 7. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable.
| ITEM 8. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable.
| ITEM 9. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS. |
Not applicable.
| ITEM 10. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
Not applicable.
| ITEM 11. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
| | (a) | The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a- 3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”)) are effective as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act and 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
| | (b) | There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act) that occurred during the registrant’s last fiscal half-year (the registrant’s second fiscal half-year in the case of an annual report) that have materially affected, or are likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
(a) (1) Code of Ethics attached hereto.
Exhibit 99.CODE ETH
(a) (2) Certifications pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 attached hereto.
Exhibit 99.CERT
(b) Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 attached hereto.
Exhibit 99.906CERT
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, there unto duly authorized.
| | |
| Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust |
| |
| By: | | /S/ R. JAY GERKEN |
| | (R. Jay Gerken) Chief Executive Officer of |
| | Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust |
| |
| Date: | | February 25, 2011 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | |
| |
| By: | | /S/ R. JAY GERKEN |
| | (R. Jay Gerken) |
| | Chief Executive Officer of |
| | Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust |
| |
| Date: | | February 25, 2011 |
| |
| By: | | /S/ KAPREL OZSOLAK |
| | (Kaprel Ozsolak) |
| | Chief Financial Officer of |
| | Legg Mason Partners Variable Equity Trust |
|
| Date: February 25, 2011 |
