As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2004
File No. 000-
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10
GENERAL FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES
PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OR 12(G) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
COLONY RESORTS LVH ACQUISITIONS, LLC
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
| | |
NEVADA | | 41-2120123 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
1999 AVENUE OF THE STARS, SUITE 1200 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA | | 90067 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 310-282-8820
Copies of correspondence to:
| | |
Mark M. Hedstrom Colony Capital, LLC 1999 Avenue of the Stars Suite 1200 Los Angeles, CA 90067 | | Thomas M. Cerabino, Esq. Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP 787 Seventh Avenue New York, NY 10019 |
SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:
| | |
Title of each class to be so registered
| | Name of each exchange on which each class to be registered
|
NOT APPLICABLE | | NOT APPLICABLE |
SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:
CLASS A MEMBERSHIP UNITS
(Title of class)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
-i-
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS MAY PROVE INACCURATE
CERTAIN STATEMENTS IN THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT (THE “REGISTRATION STATEMENT”) CONTAIN OR MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS FORWARD-LOOKING. ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE DESCRIBED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND WILL BE AFFECTED BY A VARIETY OF RISKS AND FACTORS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: THE INABILITY OF REGULATED ENTITIES AND CERTAIN OFFICERS AND OTHER AFFILIATES OF THE COMPANY (AS DEFINED HEREIN) TO OBTAIN GAMING LICENSES OR PERMITS IN JURISDICTIONS WHERE THE CURRENT OR PLANNED BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY REQUIRES SUCH LICENSES OR PERMITS; THE LIMITATION, CONDITIONING, REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION OF ANY SUCH GAMING LICENSES OR PERMITS; A FINDING OF UNSUITABILITY OR DENIAL BY REGULATORY AUTHORITIES WITH RESPECT TO ANY MANAGERS OR OFFICERS, DIRECTORS OR KEY EMPLOYEES REQUIRED TO BE FOUND SUITABLE; LOSS OR RETIREMENT OF KEY EXECUTIVES; INCREASED COMPETITION IN EXISTING MARKETS OR THE OPENING OF NEW GAMING JURISDICTIONS (INCLUDING IN NATIVE AMERICAN LANDS); A DECLINE IN THE PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE OF GAMING; INCREASES IN OR NEW TAXES OR FEES IMPOSED ON GAMING REVENUES OR GAMING DEVICES; SIGNIFICANT INCREASES IN FUEL OR TRANSPORTATION PRICES; ADVERSE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN THE COMPANY’S OR LVH CORPORATION’S (AS DEFINED HEREIN) KEY MARKETS; AND SEVERE OR UNUSUAL WEATHER IN THE COMPANY’S KEY MARKETS. IN ADDITION, THE FINANCING REQUIRED FOR THE ACQUISITION (AS DEFINED HEREIN) WILL SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE THE LEVERAGE AND OTHER FIXED CHARGE OBLIGATIONS OF THE COMPANY. THE LEVEL OF THE COMPANY’S INDEBTEDNESS AND OTHER FIXED CHARGE OBLIGATIONS COULD HAVE IMPORTANT CONSEQUENCES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: (1) A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF THE COMPANY’S CASH FLOW FROM OPERATIONS WOULD BE DEDICATED TO DEBT SERVICE AND OTHER FIXED CHARGE OBLIGATIONS AND WOULD NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR OTHER PURPOSES; (2) THE COMPANY’S ABILITY TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL FINANCING IN THE FUTURE FOR WORKING CAPITAL, CAPITAL EXPENDITURES OR ACQUISITIONS MAY BE LIMITED; AND (3) THE COMPANY’S LEVEL OF INDEBTEDNESS COULD LIMIT ITS FLEXIBILITY IN REACTING TO CHANGES IN ITS INDUSTRY AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS GENERALLY. READERS SHOULD CAREFULLY REVIEW THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE COMPANY’S AND LVH CORPORATION’S RESPECTIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (the “Company”), was formed at the direction of Colony Investors VI, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Colony VI”) and an affiliate of Colony Capital, Inc. (“Colony Capital”) of Los Angeles, California, under the laws of the State of Nevada on December 18, 2003. The Company has conducted no business other than in connection with the Purchase and Sale Agreement (as defined herein), relating to the pending acquisition of substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of LVH Corporation, a Nevada corporation (“LVH”). LVH is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Caesars Entertainment Inc., formerly Park Place Entertainment Corporation (“Park Place”) and owns and operates the Las Vegas Hilton, a casino hotel located in Las Vegas, Nevada (the “Hotel”).
Colony Capital is a private, international investment firm focusing primarily on real estate-related assets and operating companies with a strategic dependence on such assets. Colony VI is its sixth discrete investment fund. Colony Capital is led by Thomas J. Barrack, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Colony Capital has a staff of approximately 105 people, with offices in Los Angeles, New York, Kohala Coast in Hawaii, London, Paris, Rome, Seoul, Shanghai, Singapore, Taipei, and Tokyo.
The Company, LVH and Park Place, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of December 24, 2003 (the “Purchase and Sale Agreement”). Pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions to the obligations of the parties under the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Company will acquire substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of LVH (the “Acquisition”). Subsequent to the Acquisition, the Company will continue certain of the current business operations of LVH.
-2-
Following the completion of the Acquisition, the Company will not have an ongoing relationship with LVH or Park Place.
All of the Company’s Class A Units (as defined below) are currently held by Holdings (as defined below).
In connection with and immediately prior to the Acquisition, the Company expects to issue Class A Membership Units (“Class A Units”) to Colony Resorts LVH Coinvestment VoteCo, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Coinvestment VoteCo”) and Colony Resorts LVH VoteCo, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“VoteCo”) on a pro rata basis in proportion to the equity contributions made by each entity. The Company expects to issue Class B Membership Units (“Class B Units” and together with the Class A Units, the “Membership Units”) to Colony Resorts LVH Co-Investment Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Co-Investment Partners”) and to Colony Resorts LVH Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Colony VI (“Holdings”) on a pro rata basis in proportion to the equity contributions made by each entity.
In addition, the Company expects to grant an option to purchase Class A Units and Class B Units to certain of its executive officers and other qualifying parties pursuant to the terms of the equity compensation plan currently contemplated by the Company and certain employment arrangements between the Company and such executive officers. However, the Company will not grant to any one of the executive officers an option to purchase individually more than 5% of the Class A Units outstanding at the time such option is granted. See “Item 7. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”
Prior to the closing of the Acquisition, the Company expects to execute an Amended and Restated Operating Agreement (the “Operating Agreement”) by and among the Company, VoteCo, Coinvestment VoteCo, Holdings and Co-Investment Partners. Pursuant to the Operating Agreement, holders of Class A Units will be entitled to one vote per unit in all matters to be voted on by voting members of the Company. Holders of Class B Units will have no vote, except as otherwise expressly required by law. Mr. Barrack is the sole member and manager of VoteCo. Mr. Barrack and Mr. Ribis are the members and managers of Coinvestment VoteCo.
The Company will issue Class A Units and Class B Units in connection with the organizational structure to be put in place in order to consummate the Acquisition so that Holdings and Co-Investment Partners may acquire substantially all of the assets of LVH without having any voting power or other power to control the affairs or operations of the Company, except as otherwise expressly required by law. If Holdings or Co-Investment Partners had any voting or other power to control the affairs or operations of the Company, each entity and its respective constituent partners would be required to be licensed or found suitable pursuant to the gaming laws and regulations of the State of Nevada (“Nevada Act”) and Clark County liquor and gaming codes. As a result, Messrs. Barrack and Ribis, through VoteCo and Coinvestment VoteCo will be able to govern all matters of the Company that are subject to the vote of members, including the appointment of managers and officers and the amendment of the Company’s Certificate of Formation and Operating Agreement.
The Company is required to be approved by the Nevada Gaming Commission (the “Nevada Commission”), upon the recommendation of the State Gaming Control Board (the “Nevada Board”), as well as by the Clark County Liquor and Gaming Board (comprised of the Clark County Commissioners) to acquire substantially all of the assets of LVH through the Acquisition. In connection with such approvals, VoteCo and Coinvestment VoteCo must be registered as holding companies and found suitable as members of the Company. Mr. Barrack must be licensed as a member and manager of each of VoteCo and Coinvestment VoteCo and found suitable as a controlling member and manager of the Company. Mr. Ribis must be licensed as a manager and member of Coinvestment VoteCo and found suitable as a controlling member and manager of the Company.
If the Nevada Commission issues an order of registration of the Company (the “Final Order”), the Final Order may (1) prohibit Holdings, Co-Investment Partners, VoteCo, Coinvestment VoteCo or their respective affiliates from selling, assigning, transferring, pledging or otherwise disposing of Membership Units or any other security convertible into or exchangeable for Class A Units or Class B Units, without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission and (2) prohibit the Company from declaring cash dividends or distributions on any class of membership unit of the Company beneficially owned in whole or in part by Holdings, Co-Investment Partners, VoteCo, Coinvestment VoteCo or their respective affiliates, without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission. The Final Order would become effective upon issuance by the Nevada Commission.
-3-
The diagram below shows the ownership of the Company and LVH immediately before the Acquisition and the issuances of the Class A Units and the Class B Units to VoteCo and Coinvestment VoteCo, and Holdings and Co-Investment Partners, respectively, as well as certain affiliations between certain parties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ce66/8ce66f3a4b2edc74063921023eeafee0d523459b" alt="LOGO"
The diagram below shows the ownership of the Company following the Acquisition as well as certain affiliations between certain parties, as well as certain affiliations among certain parties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a602/9a6023eba030c3e4366295df6d9727e40b4661b0" alt="LOGO"
At the time of the closing of the Acquisition, the Company expects the following transfer restriction agreements will be executed: (1) Transfer Restriction Agreement by and among Mr. Barrack, Mr. Ribis, Co-Investment Partners and Coinvestment VoteCo (the “Coinvestment Transfer Restriction Agreement”) and (2) Transfer Restriction Agreement by and among Mr. Barrack, VoteCo and Holdings (the “VoteCo Transfer Restriction Agreement”).
-4-
The Company’s Class A Units to be issued to Coinvestment VoteCo will be subject to the Coinvestment Transfer Restriction Agreement, which the Company expects will provide, among other things, that:
| • | Co-Investment Partners has the right to acquire Class A Units from Coinvestment VoteCo on each occasion that Class B Units held by Co-Investment Partners would be transferred to a proposed purchaser who, in connection with such proposed sale, has obtained all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, consents, waivers, orders, findings of suitability or other approvals required to be obtained from, and has made all findings, notices or declarations required to be made with, all gaming authorities under all applicable gaming laws, |
| • | A specific purchase price, as determined in accordance with the Coinvestment Transfer Restriction Agreement, will be paid to acquire the Class A Units from Coinvestment VoteCo, and |
| • | Coinvestment VoteCo will not transfer ownership of Class A Units owned by it except pursuant to such option of Co-Investment Partners. |
The Company’s Class A Units to be issued to VoteCo will be subject to the VoteCo Transfer Restriction Agreement, which the Company expects will provide, among other things, that:
| • | Holdings has the right to acquire Class A Units from VoteCo on each occasion that Class B Units held by Holdings would be transferred to a proposed purchaser who, in connection with such proposed sale, has obtained all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, consents, waivers, orders, findings of suitability or other approvals required to be obtained from, and has made all findings, notices or declarations required to be made with, all gaming authorities under all applicable gaming laws, |
| • | A specific purchase price, as determined in accordance with the VoteCo Transfer Restriction Agreement, will be paid to acquire the Class A Units from VoteCo, and |
| • | VoteCo will not transfer ownership of Class A Units owned by it except pursuant to such option of Holdings. |
VoteCo, Coinvestment VoteCo, Holdings and Co-Investment Partners intend to enter into a Holders Agreement prior to or concurrently with the closing of the Acquisition with respect to the Membership Units held by each. The terms of the Holders Agreement are currently under negotiation. It is currently anticipated that any future holders of the Company’s Membership Units will become a party to the Holders Agreement.
The Company currently intends to finance the Acquisition and pay related fees and expenses with (1) proceeds from the issuance of Class A Units to VoteCo and Coinvestment VoteCo, Class B Units to Holdings and Co-Investment Partners (the “Equity Financing”), (2) a term loan in the amount of approximately $200 million from Goldman Sachs & Co. (the “Goldman Term Loan”); and (3) a term loan in the amount of approximately $25 million (the “Hilton Term Loan” and together with the Equity Financing and the Goldman Term Loan, the “Acquisition Financing”) from Hilton Hotel Corporation (“Hilton”). If the Acquisition is consummated, the actual types and amounts of funds utilized to finance the Acquisition and pay related fees and expenses may differ based on prevailing circumstances at the time. In addition, application of the Acquisition Financing is subject to, among other matters, applicable gaming authority approvals. The Acquisition Financing and capital structure are subject to change based on events and circumstances that occur on or prior to the closing of the Acquisition.
Certain of the assets to be acquired by the Company in the Acquisition, including the Hotel, will secure the Goldman Term Loan. It is currently anticipated that the Hilton Term Loan may be secured by certain of such assets or other collateral but it will be subordinated to the Goldman Term Loan.
The Company is filing this Form 10 Registration Statement (the “Registration Statement”) voluntarily. The Company is not required to file this Registration Statement pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) promulgated thereunder.
-5-
Upon the effectiveness of this Registration Statement, the Class A Units would be registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. Because such Class A Units would be registered under the Exchange Act, the Company would be a “publicly traded corporation” under the Nevada Act. Any beneficial owner of the Company’s voting securities or other equity securities may be required to file an application, be investigated, and have such holder’s suitability as a beneficial owner of the Company’s voting securities or other equity securities determined if the Nevada Commission has reason to believe that such ownership would otherwise be inconsistent with the declared policies of the State of Nevada. However, as the Company would be a publicly traded corporation, the Company expects that the Nevada Commission will require only that the beneficial owners of the Company’s Class A Units be found suitable, and, since the holders of Class B Units will have no voting or other control, it is anticipated, based on precedent, that the holders of Class B Units will not be subject to mandatory licensure or registration under the Nevada Act. It is customary practice of Clark County to defer to Nevada Gaming Authorities with respect to the background and suitability investigation of applications of the nature filed by the Company. Class B Unit holders will, however, remain subject to the discretionary authority of the Nevada Gaming Authorities and Clark County and may be required to file an application and have their suitability determined. Therefore, it is anticipated that the Nevada Commission and Clark County will require only VoteCo and Coinvestment VoteCo and each company’s respective members and managers to be found suitable in connection with the Acquisition. See “—Regulatory Matters—Nevada Gaming Laws and Regulations.”
Following effectiveness of this Registration Statement, the Company will be required and expects to file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information filed by the Company at the SEC’s public reference facilities at Room 1024, Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. The Company’s filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and at the world wide web site maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
LAS VEGAS HILTON
Overview of Las Vegas Hilton
The Las Vegas Hilton Hotel and Casino is located one block east of the Las Vegas Strip (the “Strip”) on approximately fifty-nine acres of land between Paradise Road and Joe W. Brown Drive adjacent to the Las Vegas Convention Center. It has approximately 2,950 hotel rooms, an approximately 74,000 square feet casino with approximately fifty table games and 1,400 slot machines, a race and sports book, twelve restaurants, approximately 3,100 parking spaces, approximately 225,000 square feet of meeting/convention space, a 1,600-seat showroom, a night club, retail outlets, an outdoor pool and a spa and health club.
Property History
Originally developed in 1969, the Hotel was purchased by Hilton in 1971 and has been operated as a Hilton-branded hotel ever since. Once considered the premier destination gaming resort in Las Vegas, the Hotel historically catered primarily to the high-end gaming customer segment as the Hotel was well-known for its luxurious suites, excellent service, entertainment and one of the top race and sports books in the world.
Since its opening, the Hotel has undergone numerous substantial expansions and renovations to its hotel and casino space. The original Hotel consisted of a central or “core” hotel tower with a North and East tower attached to it. Over the years, the East tower was expanded to its current size and the North tower was expanded twice to its current size. Expansions have also been made to the casino floor, including the 1997 addition of SpaceQuest – a 22,000 square feet themed-casino area that was developed in coordination with the ‘Star Trek: The Experience’ show, which is managed by Paramount Parks (“Paramount”).
The opening of new luxury upscale mega-resorts on the Strip during the 1990s resulted in increased competition for high-end and premium play gaming business. Due to the Hotel’s off-Strip location and intense competition from newer Strip assets, which offered customers a more updated package of rooms and amenities, the Hotel’s management decided to exit the premium gaming segment in 2000 and focus on the core convention and mid-level casino business.
-6-
The Hotel embarked on a strategy to attract convention business and mid-level casino players through the introduction of various marketing programs. Added value packages combining room, show and dinner offers were introduced to attract leisure customers to the Hotel and improve occupancy at the Hotel during non-peak hours. Complimentary and cash back programs were modified to make them more attractive to gaming customers and competitive with the Hotel’s peer group. New retail programs were introduced that gave customers the opportunity to earn tickets for playing their favorite table games and slot machines as well as for restaurant and show purchases, thereby keeping such customers at the Hotel for a longer average period of time. A new membership program was implemented for the locals market, which provided discounts on restaurants and shows, which are key drivers for the locals market.
Capital Improvements
The Hotel has been renovated and expanded over the past ten years. From 1993 to 1995, the Hotel developed three 12,600 square feet to 15,000 square feet Sky Villa Suites, which represented a $41 million investment by the Hotel. In 1994 and 1995, the Hotel built $16 million worth of new casino lounges. From 1995 to 1998, the Hotel invested approximately $62 million to renovate its rooms and suites. During the same time period, the Hotel invested approximately $72 million in connection with the development of ‘Star Trek: The Experience’ show with Paramount and the opening of the SpaceQuest Casino. In addition, the Hotel invested approximately $9 million to construct a covered parking garage. From 1999 to 2002, the Hotel has invested approximately $44 million towards the renovation of the meeting/convention space, the pool area, the health spa and the hotel rooms and corridors.
Business Strategy
The Company’s business strategy includes:
Capital Improvement Program.The Company plans to spend approximately $67 million on capital improvements in the Hotel and casino over the next forty-eight months. Amounts and timing are preliminary but reflect the best information currently available to the Company. The most important elements of this program include reconfiguration of the casino floor to open up more gaming areas, improve access and increase foot traffic through the casino. These changes will provide incentive for visitors to stay in the casino longer and increase the number of visitors to the Hotel’s food venues. In addition to the new casino design, the Company plans to remodel the bars, restaurants and entertainment venues, which will provide a new entry statement by raising ceiling heights and changing the overall feel of the entrance into the Hotel. The Company also plans to create a new signage program in the Hotel and convention areas.
Focus on Customer Service. The Company continues to emphasize the importance of creating a culture focused on customer service. Each employee will be extensively trained in their respective functional area to respond immediately to customer needs. Customer satisfaction will be a key basis of employee evaluation. The Company believes this will promote an environment in which all employees feel a sense of commitment to customer service and customers feel welcome and happy in the Hotel.
Increase in Convention Business. Though the total Las Vegas convention market has grown steadily at a rate of 8.7% over the last several years, the Hotel has seen minimal increases in convention business. This is especially incongruous because of the Hotel’s proximity to the Las Vegas Convention Center. The Company intends to reposition the Hotel as a convention hotel, taking advantage of its location, capturing benefits from both the higher average daily rate that the conventioneer pays and their longer average stay. In addition, the Company will undertake a major initiative to build relationships with both convention organizers and the Las Vegas Convention Center.
Targeted Customer Base. The Company expects to target middle-income customers with more disposable income for gaming and entertainment. The Company plans to reengineer its customer databases to identify and target value-added high margin repeat gaming customers, and to use sophisticated player tracking systems to award cash rebates or promotional allowances, such as complimentary rooms, food, beverage and entertainment to guests based on their level of profitability to the Company.
Invest in State-of-the-Art Slot Machines. The Company is committed to offering its customers the latest themed slot machines and gaming technology. The Company believes this focus is critical to retaining mid-level slot players who are more knowledgeable and sophisticated than players in other gaming segments.
-7-
Property Description
The Hotel
The 30-story Las Vegas Hilton hotel tower has been a Hilton-branded hotel for over thirty years. The Hotel consists of approximately 2,650 standard rooms and 300 suites with the standard rooms ranging from 300 square feet to 500 square feet and suites beginning at 600 square feet. Other services offered to the guests include a business center, 24-hour room service and in-room high-speed data ports.
The Company currently expects to enter into a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) pursuant to which Hilton will manage the hotel operations of the business but not the casino operations. Under the terms of the Management Agreement, the Company expects that Hilton will utilize the Hotel as its exclusive referral hotel in Las Vegas. Hilton will also provide financing in the form of the Hilton Term Loan, which will operate under a fixed interest rate, with interest only payable through maturity, and will be subordinated to the Goldman Term Loan. Specific terms of the management agreement (including the Hilton Term Loan, access to Hilton’s reservation system and fees payable) are currently under discussion with Hilton and are expected to be substantially similar to a non-binding Heads of Agreement executed in December 2003. However, the foregoing terms and provisions are subject to change based on events and circumstances that may occur on or prior to the closing of the Acquisition, and the Company currently has no binding commitments with respect to the Management Agreement or other aspects of the prospective relationship with Hilton.
The Casino
The Hotel features an approximately 74,000 square feet gaming area with approximately 1,400 slot machines and approximately fifty table games. The casino offers customers a variety of gaming options including popular table games such as Blackjack, Baccarat, Craps and Roulette and the latest slot machine games such as Monopoly™, Yahtzee™, Playboy™ and Elvis™ under applicable agreements with the manufacturers of such slot machines.
Race and Sports Book
The race and sports book is located on the east end of the main casino floor and features over 45 screens, including thirty projection television screens, eleven for the sports book and nineteen for the race book. This 10,500 square feet facility is one of the largest of its kind in the world and has seating for 400 people with eighty in the sports book area. Wagering options include daily lines, parlays, weekly golf and NASCAR betting, marquee boxing matches and grand slam tennis events plus year-round futures. The race book offers no-limit pari-mutuel wagering. In connection with the Acquisition, the Company plans to enter into a new licensing agreement with CBS Corporation (“CBS”) with the goal of operating the race and sports book as it is operated prior to the Acquisition. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to enter into a new licensing agreement with CBS or that the terms of any such agreement will be the same as the previous licensing agreement.
Restaurants
The Hotel features twelve dining options with seating for approximately 1,800 customers, including the Benihana Village. The Hotel has six fine dining options with approximately 750 seats and six casual dining restaurants with approximately 1,000 seats. All the restaurants are owned or franchised by the Hotel, with the exception of Vegas Subs, which is leased.
Entertainment
Show venues at the Hotel include the 1,600-seat Hilton Theater, the 330-seat Night Club and ‘Star Trek: The Experience’ show. Due to its high fidelity sound and large stage area, the Hilton Theater is known as one of the great showrooms in Las Vegas. This theater has great historical relevance and has hosted performances by some of the top acts in the music industry including Elvis Presley, who performed at the Hotel from 1969 to 1976. The Night Club is an after hours dance club with a bar, balcony area, dancing and a wide array of DJs and other performances. In addition, there are several separate lounges available to patrons including the Crystal Lounge located just off of the main casino floor, which features live jazz and dance bands. The Hotel also hosts ‘Star Trek: The Experience’, an approximately 65,000 square feet
-8-
attraction featuring a motion-based simulation ride, interactive video and virtual reality stations, dining and souvenir shops. This attraction was developed in collaboration with Paramount and is managed by Paramount.
Convention/Meeting Areas
The Hotel is located adjacent to the Las Vegas Convention Center, which has approximately 3.2 million square feet of total space, and features approximately 2 million square feet of net exhibit space, and 243,950 square feet of net meeting room space, accommodating 144 meeting rooms with seating capacities from 20 to 12,000.
Additionally, the Hotel itself has approximately 225,000 square feet of total meeting space including the Hilton Center, the Hilton Pavilion and the Hilton Ballroom. The Hilton Center is comprised of the Conrad Room and the Barron Room – each a pillar-free area with a total of 95,000 square feet. Using a partition, two smaller rooms can be created seating up to a total of 8,900 people depending on the seating arrangement. The Hilton Ballroom and Hilton Pavilion, located adjacent to the Hilton Center, offer a combined 78,130 square feet of space for meetings and conferences. Additionally, there are fourteen conference rooms available for meetings, each with moveable partitions, two large Board Rooms and five Salon Suites. Based upon demand for meeting space, some hotel rooms can also be converted to hospitality suites.
Las Vegas Monorail Station
The Hotel is one of only seven existing stations linking the new four-mile monorail running from MGM Grand to Sahara Hotel and Casino. The monorail is scheduled to begin operations in early 2004 and is estimated to carry nineteen million passengers annually. The Hotel is currently the only property with the station located directly at the front entrance to the property providing more convenient access to the monorail for its customers. Future plans for the monorail include extending it to downtown Las Vegas (Fremont Street), the McCarran Airport as well as to the west side of the Strip.
Other Amenities
Other amenities offered by the Hotel include an outdoor pool and recreation area with individual cabanas, an indoor/outdoor spa, fitness room, six championship tennis courts, three temperature spas, dry and wet sauna, the Cabana Bar and the Cabana Shop. Additionally, the Hotel has a Sports Zone Video Arcade and a retail area.
Las Vegas Market
Las Vegas is one of the fastest growing and largest entertainment markets in the United States. During 2002, gaming revenues in Clark County reached $7.6 billion. The number of visitors traveling to Las Vegas was approximately 35.1 million in 2002, representing a compound annual growth rate of 5.2% since 1988’s 17.2 million visitors. Aggregate expenditures by Las Vegas visitors increased at a compound annual growth rate of 8.6% from $10.0 billion in 1988 to $31.6 billion in 2002. The number of hotel and motel rooms in Las Vegas increased at a compound annual growth rate of 5.0% from 67,391 in 1989 to 126,787 in 2002.
Las Vegas Market Statistics
The following table sets forth certain statistical information for the Las Vegas market for the years 1998 through 2002, as reported by the Las Vegas Convention and Visitor Authority.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 1998
| | 1999
| | 2000
| | 2001
| | 2002
|
Visitor Volume (in thousands) | | | 30,605 | | | 33,809 | | | 35,850 | | | 35,017 | | | 35,072 |
Clark County gaming revenues (in millions) | | $ | 6,347 | | $ | 7,209 | | $ | 7,671 | | $ | 7,637 | | $ | 7,631 |
Hotel/motel rooms | | | 109,365 | | | 120,294 | | | 124,270 | | | 126,610 | | | 126,787 |
Airport passenger traffic (in thousands) | | | 30,227 | | | 33,669 | | | 36,866 | | | 35,180 | | | 35,009 |
Convention attendance (in thousands) | | | 3,302 | | | 3,773 | | | 3,853 | | | 5,014 | | | 5,105 |
-9-
Customer Segmentation
During the 1990s, the Hotel catered primarily to premium play gaming customers. Following management’s decision to exit this segment in 2000, the Hotel focused its marketing efforts primarily on the convention segment, the mid-level casino segment and the leisure and tour and travel segment.
While convention and leisure customers come from all areas of the United States, historically, geographically, California provides the largest base of customers to the Hotel accounting for approximately 60% to 65% of total room nights, followed by Arizona with 5% of total room nights and Texas with 4% of total room nights. Accordingly, as a region, California is critical to the Hotel’s success both on the hotel and casino side of the business.
The convention business is the number one market segment for the Hotel. The Hotel’s prominent location next to the Las Vegas Convention Center allows it to effectively target large convention groups, thereby increasing mid-week demand for available room nights. Of the 865,000 annual room nights occupied at the Hotel in 2002, convention groups represented approximately 37% of total room nights sold and over half of the Hotel’s room revenue.
The casino customers accounted for approximately 20% of total room nights. These customers represent the second most important market for the Hotel after the convention business. The Hotel uses a reward program to track casino customers play and provides comps based on historical levels of play.
The leisure customers accounted for approximately 43% of the Hotel’s total room nights sold in 2002. Though leisure customers accounted for a higher share of room nights than the casino customers, the Company regards the casino segment as more valuable because of higher casino play from the casino segment. Leisure customers are attracted to the Hotel due to the property’s Strip-like environment and extensive amenities offered at a more affordable and attractive cost relative to other Strip properties. Within the leisure segment, the Hotel caters to the Free & Independent Traveler leisure segment, Tour & Travel segment and package customers. The Hotel targets the leisure segment through added value packages, promotional discounts, and tour and travel operators. The Tour & Travel segment, which represents 14% of total room nights, is primarily used to increase occupancy during off-peak and low seasons.
The Hotel also attracts some locals play due to its popular race and sports book and the ease of access through the east end of the Hotel. With over 1.6 million people living in Clark County, the locals market represents an attractive customer base for the Hotel. The Hotel recently began targeting this segment through new advertising and marketing programs such as a membership program which provides discounts for shows and restaurants.
Advertising Strategy
Over the past few years, LVH has implemented various advertising strategies to reinforce the Hotel’s image as a mid-level casino product and to attract new customers to the Hotel. The Company expects to substantially maintain the existing advertising strategies after the closing of the Acquisition.
A series of advertising campaigns was introduced to deliver a consistent message about the Hotel to the customers. In addition, a new complimentary policy and cash back programs were put in place and advertised in order to reposition the Hotel as a more gambler friendly property. The entertainment lineup (including the Star Trek Experience) at the Hotel is prominently featured on billboards in order to attract locals and visitors alike.
Most of the advertising for the Hotel and its marketing programs are done through one of the following four mediums; print, radio, outdoor and internet marketing. The internet is increasingly being used to promote the Hotel
-10-
through advertising on major internet sites and search engine optimization to ensure customer traffic is directed to the Hotel’s website.
Competition
The Hotel located less than one mile east of the Strip, competes with other high-quality Las Vegas resorts and other Las Vegas hotel casinos, including those located on the Strip, on the basis of overall atmosphere, range of amenities, price, location, entertainment offered, theme and size. Currently, there are approximately thirty major gaming properties located on or near the Strip, thirteen additional major gaming properties in the downtown area and additional gaming properties located in other areas of Las Vegas. Many of the competing properties, such as the Rio, Mandalay Bay, Paris, The Venetian, The Mirage, Treasure Island, Caesar’s Palace, Luxor, New York-New York, Bellagio, Aladdin, the Palms and the MGM Grand have themes and attractions which draw a significant number of visitors and directly compete with the Hotel’s operations. Some of these facilities are operated by companies that have more than one operating facility and may have greater name recognition and financial and marketing resources than the Hotel and market to the same target demographic group as the Hotel does. Furthermore, additional hotel casinos, containing a significant number of hotel rooms, are expected to open in Las Vegas within the coming years. There can be no assurance that the Las Vegas market will continue to grow or that hotel casino resorts will continue to be popular. A decline or leveling off of the growth or popularity of such facilities would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
To a lesser extent, the Hotel competes with hotel casinos in the Mesquite, Laughlin, Reno and Lake Tahoe areas of Nevada, and in Atlantic City, New Jersey. The Hotel also competes with state-sponsored lotteries, on and off-track wagering, card parlors, riverboat and Native American gaming ventures, and other forms of legalized gaming in the United States, as well as with gaming on cruise ships, internet gaming ventures and international gaming operations. In 1998, California enacted the Tribal Government Gaming and Economic Self-Sufficiency Act (the “Tribal Act”). The Tribal Act provides a mechanism for federally recognized Native American tribes to conduct certain types of gaming on their land. The California electorate approved Proposition 1A on March 7, 2000. Proposition 1A gives all California Indian tribes the right to operate a limited number of certain kinds of gaming machines and other forms of casino wagering on California Indian reservations. Continued proliferation of gaming activities permitted by Proposition 1A may materially negatively affect Nevada gaming markets and our financial position and results of operations. The Company is unable, however, to assess the magnitude of the impact on its business.
Employees
As of December 31, 2003, the Hotel had approximately 3,200 active employees. The Hotel currently has approximately 2,570 full-time equivalent employees.
The Company recognizes that the Hotel’s employees are critical to its success and has fostered a productive work culture. Employees are offered competitive salaries and a benefits package that includes medical and dental coverage.
The Company believes that it will have a good working relationship with both its union and non-union work force. Labor unions represent approximately 69% of the work force at the Hotel with labor agreement terms ranging from one year to five years. In connection with the closing of the Acquisition, the Company shall assume obligations under existing collective bargaining agreements with certain labor unions.
Zoning, Real Estate and Environmental Issues
The Hotel is located on approximately fifty-nine acres of land designated with H-1 Limited Resort and Apartment District zoning. This H-1 Limited Resort and Apartment District was established to provide for the development of gaming enterprises, compatible commercial, and mixed commercial and residential uses, and to prohibit the development of incompatible uses that are detrimental to gaming enterprises. Permitted uses under H-1 Limited Resort and Apartment District zoning include, but are not limited to, and subject to obtaining necessary special use permits and other land use approvals, hotels, casinos, condominiums and timeshares. The existing facility sits on approximately thirty-five acres. Initial analysis, though incomplete, suggests that some of this acreage could be suitable for future development projects by the Company, third parties or some combination thereof. Although the Company has contemplated preliminary plans for
-11-
the development of this acreage, there are no definite or binding plans regarding such development. Additionally, the Company has not secured any financing in respect of such contemplated preliminary plans for development.
The Hilton Grand Vacations property, located adjacent to the Hotel, has an easement for use of approximately 260 parking spaces (out of approximately 3,100 parking spaces). There is also an easement for the use of the monorail that runs through the Hotel property.
An independent environmental consultant performed a Phase I environmental site assessment in accordance with ASTM standards on the Las Vegas Hilton property in December 2003. This assessment involved visual inspection, interviews with site personnel, review of certain publicly available records, and preparation of a written report. The assessment did not include any testing of soil or groundwater at the property. According to certain historical data integrated into the Phase I report, in 2000 it was discovered that there is a plume of tetrachloroethene in the groundwater and the property was listed as a leaking underground storage tank site. The contamination is believed to originate from an off-site source, but the source has not yet been identified. To date, the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection has not required any additional investigation at the property. The Phase I report states that levels of tetrachloroethene and total petroleum hydrocarbons in the groundwater beneath the property in 2000 exceeded certain limits allowed under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. The Phase I report indicates that the allowable levels have been exceeded in the past and a treatment system is needed to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. The Company expects to install a treatment system at a nominal cost. The Phase I report also identified asbestos-containing materials at the Hotel. The Company expects to manage these materials pursuant to an operations and maintenance program.
The Company does not expect that its compliance measures in respect of the groundwater issue or the asbestos issue will have a material effect upon its capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position. There can be no assurance, however, that the estimated capital and operating costs for the treatment system will not be exceeded or that there will be no claims or other liabilities associated with the foregoing conditions.
Litigation
The Hotel is involved in various legal proceedings relating to its business. While any proceeding or litigation has an element of uncertainty, LVH’s management believes that the final outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect upon its results of operations or financial position. The Company is not currently a party to any legal proceedings.
Purchase and Sale Agreement
On December 24, 2003, the Company, LVH and Park Place, entered into the Purchase and Sale Agreement. Pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Company will purchase substantially all of the assets of LVH, including, without limitation, the Hotel and assume certain of LVH’s liabilities. The transactions contemplated pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement are expected to be consummated during the second quarter of 2004, and the Purchase and Sale Agreement is subject to customary closing conditions. At the closing date of the Acquisition, LVH will transfer fee simple title to real property at the Hotel including, without limitation, buildings, structures, fixtures and improvements located thereon and all rights associated with the land. LVH will also assign certain contracts and agreements related to the business and the Hotel to the Company. In addition, subject to certain conditions, LVH will grant a non-exclusive license to the Company to use customer data relating to the Hotel and the business of LVH. Certain property, which is primarily owned by Park Place and used in connection with all of its hotels and casinos, is excluded from the assets transferred to the Company as set forth in the Purchase and Sale Agreement. Pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Company has also agreed to offer employment to certain employees of LVH, to assume certain of the collective bargaining agreements with existing labor unions and to assume certain obligations with respect to those employees who accept offers of employment with the Company.
In consideration for the sale of the Hotel, at closing the Company shall pay the purchase price of two-hundred and eighty million dollars ($280,000,000) subject to certain adjustments for proration items and a working capital adjustment and assume certain liabilities as set forth in the Purchase and Sale Agreement.
-12-
During the time between the execution date and the closing date (the “Pre-Closing Period”), LVH has agreed to conduct the business of the Hotel consistent in all material respects with past practice and to perform all material obligations. LVH also agreed to certain covenants during the Pre-Closing Period including, without limitation, that (a) it will refrain from entering into any contracts which (i) expire after the one year anniversary of the execution date of the Purchase and Sale Agreement or (ii) involve aggregate consideration greater than $100,000, (b) it will not enter into, amend or terminate any material real property lease or (c) it will not enter into, or renew, any employment contracts or arrangements providing for severance with any employees. Subject to certain conditions, LVH agreed to provide the Company and its representatives reasonable access to the Hotel as necessary during the Pre-Closing Period.
Regulatory Matters
Nevada Gaming Laws and Regulations.
The ownership and operation of casino gaming facilities in Nevada and the manufacture and distribution of gaming devices and cashless wagering systems for use or play in Nevada or for distribution outside of Nevada are subject to (1) the Nevada Act and (2) various local ordinances and regulations. The gaming operations of the Company are subject to the licensing and regulatory control of the State Gaming Control Board (the “Nevada Board”), the Nevada Gaming Commission (the “Nevada Commission” and collectively with the Nevada Board, the “Nevada Gaming Authorities”) and the Clark County Liquor and Gaming Board (“Clark County”).
The laws, regulations and supervisory procedures of the Nevada Gaming Authorities are based upon declarations of public policy which are concerned with, among other things: (1) the prevention of unsavory or unsuitable persons from having a direct or indirect involvement with gaming at any time or in any capacity; (2) the strict regulation of all persons, locations, practices, associations and activities related to the operation of licensed gaming establishments and the manufacture and distribution of gaming devices and cashless wagering systems; (3) the establishment and maintenance of responsible accounting practices and procedures; (4) the maintenance of effective controls over the financial practices of licensees, including the establishment of minimum procedures for internal fiscal affairs and the safeguarding of assets and revenues, providing reliable record keeping and requiring the filing of periodic reports with the Nevada Gaming Authorities; (5) the prevention of cheating and other fraudulent practices; and (6) providing a source of state and local revenues through taxation and licensing fees. Changes in such laws, regulations and procedures could have an adverse effect on the Company’s gaming operations.
The Company, is required to be licensed and VoteCo and Coinvestment VoteCo are required to be registered as holding companies with respect to the Company by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. The Company’s gaming licenses will require the periodic payment of fees and taxes and are not transferable. The Company has applied to be registered by the Nevada Commission as a publicly traded corporation (a “Registered Company”), to be found suitable to acquire the assets of LVH and for approval to hold a gaming license to own and operate the Hotel. As a Registered Company and gaming licensee, the Company will be required to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Commission and Nevada Board and furnish any other information which the Nevada Commission or Nevada Board may require. The Company is expected to continue to qualify as a Registered Company upon the effectiveness of this Registration Statement. No person may become a member or acquire a membership interest in, or receive any percentage of the profits from, the Company without first obtaining all required registrations, licenses, findings of suitability, approvals and permits from the Nevada Gaming Authorities. The Company, VoteCo and Coinvestment VoteCo have made application with the Nevada Gaming Authorities to obtain the various registrations, licenses, findings of suitability, approvals and permits (individually, a “Gaming License” and, collectively, the “Gaming Licenses”) required in order to engage in gaming operations in Nevada.
The Nevada Gaming Authorities may investigate any individual who has a material relationship to, or material involvement with, the Company, VoteCo and Coinvestment VoteCo in order to determine whether such individual is suitable or should be licensed as a business associate of a gaming licensee. Members, transferees of a member’s interest, directors, managers and certain key employees of the Company, VoteCo and Coinvestment VoteCo must file applications with the Nevada Gaming Authorities and may be required to be licensed or found suitable by the Nevada Gaming Authorities. The Nevada Gaming Authorities may deny an application for licensing for any cause which they deem reasonable. A finding of suitability is comparable to licensing, and both require submission of detailed personal and financial information followed by a thorough investigation. The applicant for licensing or a finding of suitability must pay all the costs of the investigation. Changes in licensed positions must be reported to the Nevada Gaming Authorities and in
-13-
addition to its authority to deny an application for a finding of suitability or licensure, the Nevada Commission has jurisdiction to limit, condition, restrict, revoke or suspend any license, registration, finding of suitability or approval, or to fine any person licensed, registered, found suitable or approved, for any cause which it deems reasonable.
If the Nevada Gaming Authorities were to find an officer, manager or key employee unsuitable for licensing or unsuitable to continue having a relationship with the Company, VoteCo or Coinvestment VoteCo, the companies involved would have to sever all relationships with such person. In addition, the Nevada Commission may require the Company, VoteCo or Coinvestment VoteCo to terminate the employment of any person who refuses to file appropriate applications. Determinations of suitability or of questions pertaining to licensing are not subject to judicial review in Nevada.
The Company, VoteCo and Coinvestment VoteCo will each be required to submit detailed financial and operating reports to the Nevada Gaming Authorities. Substantially all material loans, leases, sales of securities and similar financing transactions by the Company, VoteCo and Coinvestment VoteCo must be reported to, or approved by, the Nevada Commission.
If it were determined that the Nevada Act was violated by the Company, VoteCo or Coinvestment VoteCo, the Gaming Licenses they hold could be limited, conditioned, suspended or revoked, subject to compliance with certain statutory and regulatory procedures. In addition, the Company, VoteCo and Coinvestment VoteCo, and the persons involved, could be subject to substantial fines of up to $250,000 for each separate violation of the Nevada Act at the discretion of the Nevada Commission. Further, a supervisor could be appointed by the Nevada Commission to operate the Company and, under certain circumstances, earnings generated during the supervisor’s appointment could be forfeited to the State of Nevada. Limitation, conditioning or suspension of any gaming license or the appointment of a supervisor could (and revocation of any gaming license would) materially adversely affect the Company’s gaming operations.
Any beneficial holder of the Company’s voting securities or other equity securities, regardless of the number of units owned, may be required to file an application, be investigated, and have such holder’s suitability as a beneficial holder of the Company’s voting securities or other equity securities determined if the Nevada Commission has reason to believe that such ownership would otherwise be inconsistent with the declared policies of the State of Nevada. The applicant must pay all costs of investigation incurred by the Nevada Gaming Authorities in conducting any such investigation.
The Nevada Act requires any person who individually or in association with others acquires, directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership of more than 5% of the Company’s voting securities to report the acquisition to the Nevada Commission, and such person may be required to be found suitable. The Nevada Act requires that each person who, individually or in association with others, acquires, directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership of more than 10% of the Company’s voting securities apply to the Nevada Commission for a finding of suitability within thirty days after the Chairman of the Nevada Board mails the written notice requiring such filing. Under certain circumstances, an “institutional investor,” as defined in the Nevada Act, which acquires more than 10%, but not more than 15%, of the Company’s voting securities may apply to the Nevada Commission for a waiver of such suitability requirement if such institutional investor holds the voting securities for investment purposes only. An institutional investor shall not be deemed to hold voting securities for investment purposes unless the voting securities were acquired and are held in the ordinary course of business as an institutional investor and not for the purpose of causing, directly or indirectly, the election of a majority of the managers of the Company, any change in the Company’s Articles of Organization, operating agreement, management, policies or operations of the Company, or any of its gaming affiliates, or any other action which the Nevada Commission finds to be inconsistent with holding the Company’s voting securities for investment purposes only. Activities which are not deemed to be inconsistent with holding voting securities for investment purposes only include: (1) voting on all matters voted on by members; (2) making financial and other inquiries of management of the type normally made by securities analysts for informational purposes and not to cause a change in its management, policies or operations; and (3) such other activities as the Nevada Commission may determine to be consistent with such investment intent. If the beneficial holder of voting securities who must be found suitable is a corporation, partnership or trust, it must submit detailed business and financial information, including a list of beneficial owners. The applicant is required to pay all costs of investigation.
Any person who fails or refuses to apply for a finding of suitability or a license within thirty days after being ordered to do so by the Nevada Commission or the Chairman of the Nevada Board, may be found unsuitable. The same restrictions apply to a record owner of equity securities if the record owner, after request, fails to identify the beneficial
-14-
owner. Any member found unsuitable and who holds, directly or indirectly, any beneficial ownership of the equity securities of a Registered Company beyond such period of time as may be prescribed by the Nevada Commission may be guilty of a criminal offense. The Company is subject to disciplinary action if, after it receives notice that a person is unsuitable to be a member or hold a voting security or other equity security issued by the Company or to have any other relationship with the Company, the Company (1) pays that person any dividend or interest upon voting securities of the Company, (2) allows that person to exercise, directly or indirectly, any voting right conferred through securities held by that person, (3) pays remuneration in any form to that person for services rendered or otherwise, or (4) fails to pursue all lawful efforts to require such unsuitable person to relinquish his voting securities including, if necessary, the immediate purchase of said voting securities for cash at fair market value.
The Nevada Commission may, in its discretion, require the holder of any debt or nonvoting security of a Registered Company, to file applications, be investigated and be found suitable to own the debt or nonvoting security of a Registered Company. If the Nevada Commission determines that a person is unsuitable to own such security, then pursuant to the Nevada Act, the Registered Company can be sanctioned, including by revocation of its approvals, if without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission, the Registered Company: (1) pays to the unsuitable person any dividend, interest, or any distribution whatsoever; (2) recognizes any voting right by such unsuitable person in connection with such securities; (3) pays the unsuitable person remuneration in any form; or (4) makes any payment to the unsuitable person by way of principal, redemption, conversion, exchange, liquidation, or similar transaction.
The Company is required to maintain a current ledger in Nevada reflecting the ownership of record of each outstanding equity security issued by the Company which may be examined by the Nevada Gaming Authorities at any time. If any securities are held in trust by an agent or by a nominee, the record holder may be required to disclose the identity of the beneficial owner to the Nevada Gaming Authorities. A failure to make such disclosure may be grounds for finding the record holder unsuitable. The Company is also required to render maximum assistance in determining the identity of the beneficial owner. The Nevada Commission has the power to require the Company’s securities to bear a legend indicating that the securities are subject to the Nevada Act.
The Company may not make a public offering of its securities without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission if the securities or the proceeds therefrom are intended to be used to construct, acquire or finance gaming facilities in Nevada, or to retire or extend obligations incurred for such purposes. On January 7, 2004, the Company made application with the Nevada Board for approval of the registration of its Class A Units described in this Registration Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register the Company’s Class A Units under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. After recommendation by the Nevada Board, the Nevada Commission may act on the application. Approval by the Nevada Commission relates solely to the terms of the offering. It does not constitute a finding that the entity has been or will be found qualified to be involved with gaming activities in Nevada for which a separate Nevada Gaming Commission approval will be required. Further, approval does not involve a finding by the Nevada Gaming Commission as to the accuracy or adequacy of this Registration Statement; nor does it include a finding regarding the suitability of the persons involved.
Changes in control of the Company through merger, consolidation, stock or asset acquisitions, management or consulting agreements, or any act or conduct by a person whereby the person obtains control, may not occur without the prior approval of the Nevada Gaming Commission. Entities and persons seeking to acquire control of a Registered Company must satisfy the Nevada Gaming Commission in a variety of stringent standards prior to assuming control of such Registered Company. The Nevada Gaming Commission may also require controlling stockholders, members, partners, officers, directors and other persons having an ownership interest in or a material relationship or involvement with the entity proposing to acquire control to be investigated and licensed as part of the approval process relating to the transaction.
The Company has filed applications for registration as a publicly traded corporation and for state and county gaming licenses to own and operate the Hotel. Coinvestment VoteCo and VoteCo have filed applications for approval of the Nevada Gaming Commission to acquire control of the Company and for registration as holding companies. In connection with the Company’s, Coinvestment VoteCo’s and VoteCo’s applications, Mr. Barrack has filed applications for approval as a controlling member and manager of the Company and as a manager and member of Coinvestment VoteCo and VoteCo; and Mr. Ribis has filed applications for approval as a controlling member and manager of the Company, and as a manager and member of Coinvestment VoteCo. No assurances can be given that such approval and
-15-
Gaming Licenses will be granted or that, if granted, they will be granted on a timely basis. The Company may not close the Acquisition until the Gaming Licenses are obtained.
The Nevada legislature has declared that some corporate acquisitions opposed by management, repurchases of voting securities and corporate defense tactics affecting Nevada gaming licensees, and Registered Companies that are affiliated with those operations, may be injurious to stable and productive corporate gaming. The Nevada Commission has established a regulatory scheme to ameliorate the potentially adverse effects of these business practices upon Nevada’s gaming industry and to further Nevada’s policy to: (1) assure the financial stability of corporate gaming operators and their affiliates; (2) preserve the beneficial aspects of conducting business in the corporate form; and (3) promote a neutral environment for the orderly governance of corporate affairs. Approvals are, in certain circumstances, required from the Nevada Commission before the Company can make exceptional repurchases of voting securities above the current market price thereof and before a corporate acquisition opposed by management can be consummated. The Nevada Act also requires prior approval of a plan of recapitalization proposed by the Company’s directors in response to a tender offer made directly to the Registered Company’s members for the purposes of acquiring control of the Registered Company.
License fees and taxes, computed in various ways depending on the type of gaming or activity involved, are payable to the State of Nevada and to the counties and cities in which a Nevada licensee’s respective operations are conducted. Depending upon the particular fee or tax involved, these fees and taxes are payable either monthly, quarterly or annually and are based upon either: (1) a percentage of the gross revenues received; (2) the number of gaming devices operated; or (3) the number of table games operated. An excise tax is imposed on admission to any facility operated by a licensed gaming establishment where live entertainment is provided. The tax rate varies with the size of the facility in which the live entertainment is conducted and where maximum occupancy is less than 7,500, amounts paid for food, refreshments and merchandise purchased at the facility during live entertainment are also subject to taxation. Nevada licensees that hold a license as an operator of a slot machine route, or a manufacturer’s or distributor’s license, also pay certain fees and taxes to the State of Nevada.
Any person who is licensed, required to be licensed, registered, required to be registered, or under common control with such persons (collectively, “Licensees”), and who proposes to become involved or is involved in a gaming venture outside of Nevada (“Foreign Gaming”) is required to deposit with the Nevada Board, and thereafter maintain, a revolving fund in the amount of $10,000 to pay the expenses of investigation of the Nevada Board of their participation in such Foreign Gaming. The revolving fund is subject to increase or decrease in the discretion of the Nevada Commission. Thereafter, Licensees are required to comply with certain reporting requirements imposed by the Nevada Act. A licensee is also subject to disciplinary action by the Nevada Commission if it knowingly violates any laws of the foreign jurisdiction pertaining to the Foreign Gaming operation, fails to conduct the Foreign Gaming operation in accordance with the standards of honesty and integrity required of Nevada gaming operations, engages in activities or enters into associations that are harmful to the State of Nevada or its ability to collect gaming taxes and fees, or employs, contracts with, or associates with, a person in the Foreign Gaming operation who has been denied a license or finding of suitability in Nevada on the ground of personal unsuitability.
Gaming and liquor activities at the Hotel are subject to regulation and licensing by the Clark County Department of Business License. The Company has made application with the Clark County Department of Business License which serves as staff to the Clark County Liquor and Gaming Board (the members of which are the Clark County Commissioners) for all required gaming and liquor licenses in the unincorporated areas of Clark County. The Clark County application and regulatory process, which is detailed in the Clark County Code, is independent from, consistent with, but less extensive than, the application and regulatory process of the Nevada Gaming Authorities. Background and suitability investigations in Clark County are conducted primarily by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (“LVMPD”). It is the customary practice of Clark County and the LVMPD to defer to the Nevada Gaming Authorities for the background and suitability investigation of applications of the nature filed by the Company, but jurisdiction is retained to conduct any investigation and take any regulatory action deemed appropriate under the circumstances, to the extent allowed under Clark County Code as amended from time to time. Clark County liquor and gaming licenses are revocable and are not transferable.
-16-
ITEM 2 | FINANCIAL INFORMATION. |
The Company
The Company has conducted no business other than in connection with the Purchase and Sale Agreement and has no material assets or liabilities. See “Item 1. Business—The Company” and the financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2003 included elsewhere herein.
LVH
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
LVH has derived the following historical information from its audited financial statements for 2001 through 2003 and from its unaudited financial statements for 1999 and 2000. LVH’s audited financial statements and related notes thereto as of December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 appear elsewhere in this Registration Statement. The unaudited financial statements include all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations. The information is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis in this section and the historical financial statements and related notes in Item 13. The selected financial data is not necessarily indicative of the Company’s or LVH’s future results of operations or condition.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended or as of December 31,
|
| | 2003
| | | 2002
| | | 2001
| | | 2000
| | | 1999
|
| | (dollars in thousands) |
Results of Operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenue | | $ | 214,011 | | | $ | 215,651 | | | $ | 226,842 | (1) | | $ | 271,904 | (1) | | $ | 357,297 |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 18,190 | | | | 16,708 | (2) | | | 31,790 | (2) | | | 22,579 | (2) | | | 40,401 |
Impairment loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | 124,000 | (3) | | | 55,000 | (3) | | | — |
Total operating (loss) income | | | (15,525 | ) | | | (6,429 | ) | | | (145,998 | ) | | | (54,531 | ) | | | 8,100 |
Net (loss) income | | | (15,525 | ) | | | (6,417 | ) | | | (145,934 | ) | | | (47,460 | ) | | | 4,779 |
Balance Sheet: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets | | | 207,211 | | | | 207,256 | | | | 203,712 | (3) | | | 375,441 | (3) | | | 479,417 |
Total stockholder’s equity | | | 118,712 | | | | 134,237 | | | | 140,654 | | | | 286,588 | | | | 334,048 |
(1) | In July 2000, a definitive agreement was signed that would have resulted in the sale of the property, building and equipment of LVH for a base price of $300,000,000. The agreement provided that Park Place would retain receivables relating to high-end casino play and would attempt to service high-end customers at other properties. As anticipated by the agreement, and once it was announced, high-end gaming customers gradually ceased play at the Hotel. During the third and fourth quarters of 2000, revenues began to reflect the loss of the high-end play without incremental lower and mid-level gamblers’ play or increased convention business. Operating income was also negatively impacted as costs associated with the high-end play could not be reduced as quickly because the Hotel continued to provide service to the remaining high-end market pending closing of the sale. Additionally, the held-for-sale status affected the Hotel’s ability to compete for other casino business. |
(2) | As the Hotel was considered “Held for Sale” effective July 2000, no deprecation and amortization expense was charged from that date through December 31, 2000. Effective January 2001, the Hotel was no longer considered “Held for Sale” and as such, depreciation and amortization expense resumed at that time on the remaining assets after the $55,000,000 second quarter of 2000 non-cash impairment loss (See Note (3) following). Depreciation and amortization decreased once again after the $124,000,000 write-down of fixed assets that occurred in the third quarter of 2001. |
(3) | In July 2000, a definitive agreement was signed that would have resulted in the sale of the property, building and equipment of LVH for a base price of $300,000,000. As a result, a $55,000,000 non-cash impairment loss was |
-17-
| taken in the second quarter of 2000. In January 2001, the purchaser failed to further extend the closing date and did not complete the transaction. Park Place ceased its efforts to sell the Hotel and continued to operate it in the normal course, but with a focus on lower and mid-level gamblers’ play and convention business. During 2001, revenues declined from $73,000,000 in the first quarter to $48,000,000 in the third quarter. Operating income during 2001 was $7,000,000 in the first quarter, a loss of $3,000,000 in the second quarter, and a loss of $14,000,000 in the third quarter. The successive quarters of operating losses coupled with the significant reduction in convention and group visitation into Las Vegas resulting from the events of September 11 necessitated a review of LVH’s assets for impairment. Based on an analysis of expected future cash flows, an impairment existed. LVH engaged an independent appraisal company to assist in the valuation of the Hotel. The fair value was determined using a combination of future cash flow analysis and market/sales comparison analysis of the Hotel resulting in a fair value that was $124,000,000 less than the carrying value of the assets. A $124,000,000 write-down of fixed assets was made in the third quarter of 2001. |
-18-
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA
The following unaudited pro forma balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2003 and unaudited pro forma statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2003, give effect to the Acquisition and the Acquisition Financing as if they occurred, for balance sheet purposes, on December 31, 2003 and, for statement of operations purposes, on January 1, 2003. There can be no assurance that the Acquisition will be consummated or that the Acquisition Financing will be utilized. See “Item 1. Business—The Company.” If the Acquisition is consummated, the actual types and amounts of funds utilized to finance the Acquisition and pay related fees and expenses may differ based on prevailing circumstances at the time. The unaudited pro forma financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been reported had such transactions actually occurred on the date specified, nor are they indicative of the Company’s or the Hotel’s future results of operations or financial condition. The unaudited pro forma financial statements are based on and should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by, the historical financial statements and notes thereto of the Company, the historical financial statements and notes thereto of LVH (including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” relating thereto) appearing elsewhere in this Registration Statement.
-19-
Unaudited Pro Forma Balance Sheet
(As of December 31, 2003)
(In 000’s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Historical Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC
| | | Historical LVH
| | | Pro Forma Adjustments (see note 2)
| | | | | | Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC Pro Forma As Adjusted
| |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | | | | $ | 12,734 | | | $ | 24,760 | | | 2 | (b) | | $ | 37,494 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | — | | | | 21,764 | | | | — | | | | | | | 21,764 | |
Inventories | | | — | | | | 2,472 | | | | 422 | | | 2 | (g) | | | 2,894 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | — | | | | 3,894 | | | | (2,118 | ) | | 2 | (h)(1) | | | 1,776 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
Total current assets | | | — | | | | 40,864 | | | | 23,064 | | | | | | | 63,928 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net | | | — | | | | 166,159 | | | | 2,183 | | | 2 | (i) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | (19,121 | ) | | 2 | (h)(2) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | 135,298 | | | 2 | (d) | | | 284,519 | |
Restricted cash | | | 15,000 | | | | — | | | | 32,000 | | | 2 | (a) | | | 47,000 | |
Other assets | | | 1,950 | | | | 188 | | | | — | | | | | | | 2,138 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 16,950 | | | $ | 207,211 | | | $ | 173,424 | | | | | | $ | 397,585 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liabilities and Stockholder’s/Member’s Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and bank overdrafts | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,935 | | | $ | — | | | | | | $ | 4,935 | |
Due to affiliated companies | | | 17,362 | | | | 39,993 | | | | (39,993 | ) | | 2 | (e) | | | 17,362 | |
Accrued expenses | | | — | | | | 43,499 | | | | (2,871 | ) | | 2 | (h)(3)(4) | | | 40,628 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
Total current liabilities | | | 17,362 | | | | 88,427 | | | | (42,864 | ) | | | | | | 62,925 | |
Long-term debt | | | — | | | | — | | | | 225,000 | | | 2 | (c) | | | 225,000 | |
Other liabilities | | | — | | | | 72 | | | | — | | | | | | | 72 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Total liabilities | | | 17,362 | | | | 88,499 | | | | 182,136 | | | | | | | 287,997 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commitments and Contingencies | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Stockholder’s/Member’s Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common stock/membership interest | | | — | | | | 1 | | | | (1 | ) | | 2 | (f) | | | — | |
| | | — | | | | — | | | | 110,000 | | | 2 | (f) | | | 110,000 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | — | | | | 332,747 | | | | (332,747 | ) | | 2 | (f) | | | — | |
Retained earnings (deficit). | | | (412 | ) | | | (214,036 | ) | | | 214,036 | | | 2 | (f) | | | (412 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
Total stockholder’s/member’s equity | | | (412 | ) | | | 118,712 | | | | (8,712 | ) | | | | | | 109,588 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholder’s/member’s equity. | | $ | 16,950 | | | $ | 207,211 | | | $ | 173,424 | | | | | | $ | 397,585 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to this unaudited pro forma balance sheet.
-20-
Unaudited Pro Forma Statement of Operations
(For the year ended December 31, 2003)
(In 000’s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Historical Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC
| | | Historical LVH
| | | Pro Forma Adjustments (see note 3)
| | | | | | Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC Pro Forma As Adjusted
| |
Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino | | $ | — | | | $ | 75,864 | | | $ | — | | | | | | $ | 75,864 | |
Rooms | | | — | | | | 72,686 | | | | — | | | | | | | 72,686 | |
Food and beverage | | | — | | | | 47,396 | | | | — | | | | | | | 47,396 | |
Other | | | — | | | | 18,065 | | | | — | | | | | | | 18,065 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
Net revenues | | | — | | | | 214,011 | | | | — | | | | | | | 214,011 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino | | | — | | | | 54,639 | | | | (823 | ) | | 3 | (d) | | | 53,816 | |
Rooms | | | — | | | | 25,929 | | | | — | | | | | | | 25,929 | |
Food and beverage | | | — | | | | 49,105 | | | | — | | | | | | | 49,105 | |
Other expenses | | | — | | | | 11,501 | | | | — | | | | | | | 11,501 | |
General and administrative | | | 412 | | | | 63,609 | | | | 3,523 | | | 3 | (a) | | | 67,544 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | — | | | | 18,190 | | | | (2,161 | ) | | 3 | (b) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | 857 | | | 3 | (c) | | | 16,886 | |
Management fee to Park Place | | | — | | | | 6,563 | | | | (6,563 | ) | | 3 | (a) | | | — | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
| | | 412 | | | | 229,536 | | | | (5,167 | ) | | | | | | 224,781 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
Operating loss | | | (412 | ) | | | (15,525 | ) | | | 5,167 | | | | | | | (10,770 | ) |
Interest (expense) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (19,800 | ) | | 3 | (e) | | | (19,800 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
Net loss | | $ | (412 | ) | | $ | (15,525 | ) | | $ | (14,633 | ) | | | | | $ | (30,570 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| | | | |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to this unaudited pro forma statement of operations.
-21-
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | The following tables set forth the determination of the preliminary allocation of the purchase price of the Hotel (in thousands): |
| | | |
Cash consideration (i) | | $ | 280,000 |
Estimated transaction fees and expenses | | | 12,100 |
| |
|
|
Total | | $ | 292,100 |
| |
|
|
The preliminary allocation of pro forma purchase price is as follows (in thousands):
| | | |
Land | | $ | 153,982 |
Buildings, furniture, fixtures and equipment | | | 130,537 |
Other | | | 7,581 |
| |
|
|
Total | | $ | 292,100 |
| |
|
|
The final purchase price and its allocation will be based on appraisals and estimates by management and is expected to be completed within one year from the closing.
| (i) | This amount represents the base purchase price of $280 million. A subsequent adjustment to the final cash consideration will be determined based on the working capital acquired from LVH at the date of the closing of the Acquisition. |
2. | The following is a brief description of the pro forma adjustments to the balance sheet to reflect the Acquisition. |
| a) | Represents $32 million of loan proceeds held in reserve to pay for property renovations during the first 24-month term of the Acquisition Financing and to cover interest reserves. |
| b) | Represents an adjustment to the purchase price related to working capital requirements imposed on LVH by the Purchase and Sale Agreement. |
| c) | Represents the Acquisition Financing, which will consist of: |
| (1) | A term loan in the amount of approximately $200 million from Goldman Sachs & Co., secured by a non-recourse first mortgage on the Hotel, interest only, interest at one-month LIBOR, plus 6.5% (Company must purchase and maintain at all times an interest rate cap with a LIBOR strike rate of 5% for the first two years of the term loan and an interest rate cap with a LIBOR strike rate of 6% for any extension periods); 4-year maturity, comprised of a two-year initial term with 2 one-year extension options. |
| (2) | A term loan in the amount of approximately $25 million from Hilton Hotel Corporation, subordinate to the $200 million first mortgage term loan in 2(c)(1), interest only at 8% per annum, term of 15 years subject to early termination provisions. |
| d) | Reflects an increase of $135.3 million, representing a step-up in the basis of the property, plant and equipment to be acquired. |
| e) | Represents the elimination of the Due to Affiliated Companies amount of $39,993 to be retained by Park Place. |
| f) | Represents the elimination of the common stock, additional paid-in-capital and retained earnings of LVH and the expected equity contributions from the issuance by the Company of Class A and Class B Membership Units. |
-22-
| g) | Represents inventory maintained at a Park Place warehouse not included in the LVH historical balance sheet but included as part of the Acquisition. |
| h) | Represents assets and liabilities to remain with Park Place as provided in the Purchase and Sale Agreement as follows: |
| (1) | Prepaid gaming taxes, insurance and licenses; |
| (3) | Accrued workers’ compensation; and |
| (4) | Accrued gaming-related liabilities. |
| i) | Represents the fair value of gaming equipment leased under operating lease arrangements by LVH which will be acquired by the Company. |
3. | The following is a brief description of the pro forma adjustments to the statement of operations to reflect the Acquisition. |
| a) | Following the Acquisition, the Company will not pay a management fee to Park Place. However, the Company believes that it may incur approximately $3,523,000of costs related to corporate overhead, including executive compensation pursuant to employment agreements, as a result of operating the Hotel on a stand-alone basis. |
| b) | Represents a reduction in depreciation expense related to corporate aircraft, which are not included in the purchased assets. |
| c) | Represents an increase in depreciation expense for gaming equipment leased under operating lease arrangements by LVH, which will be acquired by the Company. Depreciation expense is estimated using the straight line method over a five year life. The service lives of acquired assets are generally thirty to forty years for buildings and three to ten years for furniture and equipment. |
| d) | Represents the lease expense related to gaming equipment leased under operating lease arrangements by LVH which will be acquired by the Company. See Notes 2(i) and 3(c). |
| e) | Represents the interest expense related to the proposed Acquisition Financing and the amortization of the estimated transaction fees and expenses. The $200 million non-recourse first mortgage term loan in 2(c)(1) bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 6.5%. An increase of 1/8 of a percentage point in the average LIBOR rate would increase the Company’s annual interest cost by approximately $250,000. |
| f) | Since the Company is a limited liability company, there is no provision for federal income taxes. Distributions will be made to members to cover individual federal and state income tax liabilities. |
-23-
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview of the Company
The Company has conducted no business or operations other than in connection with the Acquisition. Pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, and as of the closing date of the Acquisition, the Company will acquire substantially all of the assets and assume certain liabilities of LVH and assume operational control of the business and the Hotel. Until such time, LVH will continue to operate its business and the Hotel. As such, the Company can not provide substantive disclosure on all aspects of the business of LVH and the Hotel. The comparative summary of the results of operations address the historical operation of LVH and the Hotel and are based upon Park Place’s and LVH’s historical information. See “Item 2: Financial Information-The Company.”
Subsequent to the closing of the Acquisition, the Company expects to operate the business and the Hotel using the proceeds from the Acquisition Financing, including the issuance of the Membership Units and the Goldman Term Loan and Hilton Term Loan, the terms of which are currently being negotiated. The Company expects that the Goldman Term Loan will contain important affirmative and negative financial covenants customary for loans of this nature, which may restrict the Company’s ability to operate the casino and hotel operations or pursue development opportunities if desired.
In addition, the Company currently expects to enter into the Management Agreement pursuant to which Hilton will manage the hotel operations of the business but not the casino operations. Under the terms of the Management Agreement, the Company expects that Hilton will utilize the Hotel as its exclusive referral hotel in Las Vegas. Hilton will also provide financing in the form of the Hilton Term Loan, which will operate under a fixed interest rate, with interest only payable through maturity, and will be subordinated to the Goldman Term Loan. Specific terms of the Management Agreement (including the Hilton Term Loan, access to Hilton’s reservation system and fees payable) are currently under discussion with Hilton and are expected to be substantially similar to a non-binding Heads of Agreement executed in December 2003. However, the foregoing terms and provisions are subject to change based on events and circumstances that may occur on or prior to the closing of the Acquisition, and the Company currently has no binding commitments with respect to the Management Agreement or other aspects of the prospective relationship with Hilton.
Overview and Summary of LVH
LVH currently owns and operates the Hotel. The following discussion reflects the Hotel’s results of operations as an asset of LVH. Until the sale is completed, the Hotel will be accounted for by Park Place as an asset held for sale and property and equipment will no longer be depreciated.
Results of Operations
The following discussion presents an analysis of LVH’s results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.
LVH is in the business of operating a casino/hotel. LVH’s primary sources of revenue consist of casino operations, room rental, and food and beverage sales.
Casino revenue is derived primarily from patrons wagering on slot machines, table games and other gaming activities. Table games generally include Blackjack or Twenty One, Craps, Baccarat and Roulette. Other gaming activities include Keno and Race and Sports. Casino revenue is defined as the win from gaming activities, computed as the difference between gaming wins and losses, not the total amounts wagered. “Table game volume,” “table game drop” (terms which are used interchangeably), and “slot handle” are casino industry specific terms that are used to identify the amount wagered by patrons for a casino table game or slot machine, respectively. “Table game hold” and “slot hold” represent the percentage of the total amount wagered by patrons that the casino has won. Hold is derived by dividing the amount won by the casino by the amount wagered by patrons. Casino revenue is recognized at the end of each gaming day.
-24-
Rooms revenue is derived from rooms and suites rented to guests. “Average daily rate” is an industry specific term used to define the average amount of revenue per rented room per day. “Occupancy percentage” defines the total percentage of rooms occupied, and is computed by dividing the number of rooms occupied by the total number of rooms available. Room revenue is recognized at the time the room is provided to the guest.
Food and beverage revenues are derived from food and beverage sales in the food outlets of our casino/hotel, including restaurants, room service and banquets. Food and beverage revenue is recognized at the time the food and/or beverage is provided to the guest.
Other revenue includes retail sales, entertainment sales, telephone and other miscellaneous income at our casino/hotel. Such revenue is recognized at the time the goods or services are provided to the guest.
Comparison of December 31, 2003 with December 31, 2002
LVH recorded a net loss of $15,525,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared with a net loss of $6,417,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The net loss widened by $9,108,000 due to increased promotional costs, increased insurance costs and costs incurred in connection with the pending sale of the Hotel.
Casino
Casino revenues decreased $5,548,000 to $75,864,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to $81,412,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002. Table games accounted for the entire decrease in casino revenues due to decreases in both volume and hold percentage. Table games volume decreased 17.7 percent for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to the prior year. In addition, hold percentage decreased 0.7 percentage points year over year. The combination of decreased table games volume and hold percentage resulted in decreased table games win of $7,102,000. This was partially offset by increased slot win of $2,827,000 to $46,711,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003, compared to $43,884,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002.
LVH’s casino operating margin decreased to 28.0 percent for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to 35.6 percent for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease in casino margin was primarily attributable to increased promotional costs incurred to generate revenues and customer traffic at the Hotel.
Rooms
Room revenues increased $4,628,000 to $72,686,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to $68,058,000 recorded for the year ended December 31, 2002. Occupancy percentage at the Hotel increased to 87% for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to 85% for the year ended December 31, 2002. This was slightly offset by the decrease in the average daily rate at the Hotel from $88 for the year ended December 31, 2002 to $87 for the year ended December 31, 2003. The increase in volume was primarily attributable to increased convention related business at the Hotel due to increased activity at the Las Vegas Convention Center. Convention occupied rooms were up 15 percent when compared to the year ended December 31, 2002, while tour and travel occupied rooms increased 11 percent.
LVH’s room operating margin for the year ended December 31, 2003 was relatively flat at 64.3 percent compared to 64.9 percent for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Food and Beverage
Food and beverage revenues increased $4,324,000 to $47,396,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to $43,072,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase in revenue is primarily due to an increase in banquet and coffee shop revenue when compared to last year due to increased convention related business as discussed above.
LVH’s food and beverage operating margin for the year ended December 31, 2003 was a loss of 3.6 percent compared to a loss of 5.9 percent for the year ended December 31, 2002. The slight improvement was due to decreased cost of food in the current year when compared to 2002.
-25-
Other
Other revenue includes retail sales, entertainment sales, telephone and other miscellaneous income at the Hotel. Other revenue decreased $5,044,000 to $18,065,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared to $23,109,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease is principally due to decreased entertainment revenues of $4.2 million and telephone revenues of $1.3 million. The number of shows held at the Hotel was decreased by nineteen from 303 in 2002 due to cancellations by one of the performers scheduled to appear at the Hotel. The decrease in telephone revenues was primarily due to increased cellular phone usage by hotel guests.
Other expense includes costs associated with retail, entertainment, telephone and other miscellaneous costs at the Hotel. Other expense decreased $3,957,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease for the year ended December 31, 2003 was mainly attributable to a decrease in the number of shows held at the Hotel.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expense includes costs associated with selling, general, administrative and property operations at the Hotel. General and administrative expense increased $2,250,000 to $63,609,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to $61,359,000 for the comparable period of 2002. This increase was primarily due to increased legal costs of $0.7 million, insurance costs of $0.9 million and costs incurred in connection with the pending sale of the Hotel of $1.1 million.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $1,482,000 to $18,190,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to $16,708,000 for the comparable period of 2002. This increase was primarily due to the depreciation associated with the shorter-lived property and equipment purchases made during the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. Such shorter-lived property and equipment purchases consisted of maintenance capital expenditure purchases. Room department upgrades included a $20,000,000 hotel room and corridor renovation project completed during 2002.
Comparison of December 31, 2002 with December 31, 2001
LVH recorded a net loss of $6,417,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared with a net loss of $145,934,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001. The net loss decreased by $139,517,000 primarily due to the impairment loss of $124,000,000 charged during the year ended December 31, 2001, decreased depreciation and amortization due to the impairment charge taken during the third quarter of 2001 and decreased casino expenses associated with high-end players during the year ended December 31, 2002. These factors were slightly offset by increased entertainment expenses incurred during the year ended December 31, 2002 due to the increase in the number of shows at the Hotel.
Casino
Casino revenues decreased $1,579,000 to $81,412,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to $82,991,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001. Table games accounted for the entire decrease in casino revenues due to decreases in both volume and hold percentage. Table games volume decreased 8.4 percent for the year ended December 31, 2002, compared to the prior year. In addition, hold percentage decreased 0.7 percentage points year over year. The combination of decreased table games volume and hold percentage resulted in decreased table games win of $2,911,000.
LVH’s casino operating margin increased to 35.6 percent for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to 22.9 percent for the year ended December 31, 2001. The increase in casino margin was primarily attributable to decreased costs associated with high-end play. The primary decreased cost was for patron discounts and provisions for uncollectible patron accounts. The refocusing of the Hotel on convention business and away from high-end table games players resulted in both lower revenues and the decreased costs associated with such play.
-26-
Rooms
Room revenues decreased $7,018,000 to $68,058,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $75,076,000 recorded for the year ended December 31, 2001. Occupancy percentage at the Hotel decreased to 85% for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to 88% for the year ended December 31, 2001. This was compounded by the decrease in the average daily rate at the Hotel from $90 for the year ended December 31, 2001 to $88 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease in both volume and rate was primarily attributable to decreased convention related business and tour and travel business at the Hotel due to the events of September 11, 2001.
LVH’s room operating margin for the year ended December 31, 2002 was 64.9 percent compared to 65.7 percent for the year ended December 31, 2001. The margin decrease was primarily due to rate decreases offered to convention groups for the year ended December 31, 2002 as compared to the rates charged for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Food and Beverage
Food and beverage revenues decreased $3,586,000 to $43,072,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $46,658,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001. The decrease in revenue is primarily due to decreased banquets held at the Hotel in wake of the events of September 11, 2001.
LVH’s food and beverage operating margin for the year ended December 31, 2002 was a loss of 5.9 percent compared to a profit of 0.8 percent for the year ended December 31, 2001. The slight decrease was due to increased cost of food in 2002 when compared to 2001 as well as an increase in union employee benefits.
Other
Other revenue includes retail sales, entertainment sales, telephone and other miscellaneous income at our casino/hotel. Other revenue increased $992,000 to $23,109,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002 as compared to $22,117,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001. The increase is principally due to increased entertainment revenues of $3.4 million, but was offset by decreased telephone revenues of $2.2 million. The number of shows held at the Hotel was increased in order to generate both gaming and non-gaming revenue.
Other expense includes costs associated with retail, entertainment, telephone and other miscellaneous costs at the Hotel. Other expense increased $4,050,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to the year ended December 31, 2001. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2002 was mainly attributable to increase in the number of shows held at the Hotel.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expense includes costs associated with selling, general, administrative and property operations at our casino hotel. General and administrative expense decreased $1,335,000 to $61,359,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $62,694,000 for the comparable period of 2002. This decrease was primarily due to decreased payroll and bonus expenses, partially offset by an increase in Hotel advertising for the additional entertainment offered at the Hotel.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $15,082,000 to $16,708,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $31,790,000 for the comparable period of 2001. This decrease was primarily due to the decreased depreciable asset values as a result of the impairment charge recorded during the third quarter of 2001.
Impairment Loss
In July 2000, a definitive agreement was signed that would have resulted in the sale of LVH’s property, building and equipment for a base price of $300,000,000. The agreement provided that Park Place would retain receivables
-27-
relating to high-end casino play, and would attempt to service high-end customers at other properties. As anticipated by the agreement, and once it was announced, high-end gaming customers gradually ceased play at the Hotel.
During the third and fourth quarters of 2000, revenues began to reflect the loss of the high-end play without incremental lower and mid-level gamblers’ play or increased convention business. Operating income was also negatively impacted as costs associated with the high-end play could not be reduced as quickly because the Hotel continued to provide service to the remaining high-end market pending closing of the sale. Additionally, the held-for-sale status affected the Hotel’s ability to compete for other casino business.
In January 2001, the purchaser failed to further extend the closing date and did not complete the transaction, thereby breaching the terms of the agreement. Park Place ceased its efforts to sell the Hotel and continued to operate it in the normal course, but with a focus on lower and mid-level gamblers’ play and convention business. However, the facilities were originally designed to cater to and accommodate high-end play.
During 2001, revenues declined from $73,000,000 in the first quarter to $48,000,000 in the third quarter. Operating income during 2001 was $7,000,000 in the first quarter, a loss of $3,000,000 in the second quarter, and a loss of $14,000,000 in the third quarter. The successive quarters of operating losses coupled with the significant reduction in convention and group visitation into Las Vegas resulting from the events of September 11 necessitated a review of LVH’s assets for impairment.
Based on an analysis of expected future cash flows, an impairment existed. LVH engaged an independent appraisal company to assist in the valuation of the Hotel. The fair value was determined using a combination of future cash flow analysis and market/sales comparison analysis of the Hotel resulting in a fair value that was $124,000,000 less than the carrying value of the assets. A $124,000,000 write-down of fixed assets was made in the third quarter of 2001.
Financial Condition
Liquidity
The following is a description of LVH’s historical liquidity and capital resources. As of December 31, 2003, LVH had cash and equivalents of $12,734,000 which is primarily cash in LVH’s casino used to fund LVH’s daily operations. Net cash provided by operating activities was $3,120,000 in 2003 and $1,385,000 in 2002. LVH had the ability to borrow from Park Place to fund any operating cash needs as well as capital projects at the Hotel. A downturn in the economy, increase in revenue or wagering taxes, acts of terrorism, war or military actions would impact LVH’s casino operations and negatively impact its cash flows from operations. If this were to occur, LVH would be required to adjust its capital spending plans as described below.
Subsequent to the closing of the Acquisition, the Company expects to derive its future liquidity from the Acquisition Financing, including the issuance of the Membership Units and the Goldman Term Loan and Hilton Term Loan, the terms of which are currently being negotiated. Although the final terms of the Goldman Term Loan remain under discussion and are subject to change based on events and circumstances that occur on or prior to the closing of the Acquisition, the Goldman Term Loan is expected to be for a principal amount of $200 million with a coupon equal to LIBOR plus 650 basis points and $32 million of the Goldman Term Loan is expected to be held back for capital expenditures and an interest reserve. The initial term is expected to be two years with two year extension options. In addition, the Company expects that the Goldman Term Loan will contain important affirmative and negative financial covenants customary for loans of this nature, which may restrict the Company’s ability to operate the casino and hotel operations or pursue development opportunities if desired.
In addition, the Company currently expects to enter into the Management Agreement pursuant to which Hilton will manage the hotel operations of the business but not the casino operations. Under the terms of the Management Agreement, the Company expects that Hilton will utilize the Hotel as its exclusive referral hotel in Las Vegas. Hilton will also provide financing in the form of the Hilton Term Loan, which will operate under a fixed interest rate, with interest only payable through maturity, and will be subordinated to the Goldman Term Loan. Specific terms of the Management Agreement (including the debt financing, access to Hilton’s reservation system and fees payable) are currently under discussion with Hilton and are expected to be substantially similar to a non-binding Heads of Agreement executed in
-28-
December 2003. However, the Acquisition Financing, including the foregoing terms and provisions of the Goldman Term Loan and Hilton Term Loan, and the Company’s capital structure are subject to change based on events and circumstances that may occur on or prior to the closing of the Acquisition, and the Company currently has no binding commitments with respect to the Management Agreement or other aspects of the prospective relationship with Hilton.
Capital Spending and Acquisitions
Investing cash flow activities include maintenance capital expenditures, new construction, and improvement projects at existing facilities. For the year ended December 31, 2003, net cash used in investing activities for LVH included $11,434,000 related to capital expenditures for normal maintenance and expansion projects. LVH’s capital expenditures include maintenance capital expenditures which are those long-lived assets required to maintain its properties in good operating condition. Such capital items include new gaming equipment, room and restaurant refurbishments, computer hardware, furniture and office equipment, vehicles, and other similar items.
Capital expenditures for 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $11,434,000, $19,470,000, and $10,914,000, respectively.
The Company plans to spend approximately $67 million on capital improvements in the Hotel and casino over the next forty-eight months. The most important elements of this program include reconfiguration of the casino floor to open up more gaming areas, improve access and increase foot traffic through the casino. In addition to the new casino design, the Company plans to remodel the bars, restaurants and entertainment venues. The Company also plans to create a new signage program in the Hotel and convention areas. Amounts and timing are preliminary but reflect the best information currently available to the Company. Additionally, the Acquisition Financing is adequate to fund a large part, but not all, of such contemplated capital improvements, with the rest currently expected to be funded out of available cash flow from future operations.
The existing facility sits on approximately thirty-five acres. Initial analysis, though incomplete, suggests that some of this acreage could be suitable for future development projects by the Company, third parties or some combination thereof. Although the Company has contemplated preliminary plans for the development of this acreage, there are no definite or binding plans regarding such development. Additionally, the Company has not secured any financing in respect of such contemplated preliminary plans for development.
Other
LVH has advised that, prior to the closing of the Acquisition, its cash flow from operations, together with cash on hand and availability to borrow from Park Place, will be adequate to fund the capital expenditures that LVH is reasonably likely to make over the foreseeable future. To the extent that LVH’s cash flow from operations is less than it anticipates or that LVH’s credit instruments with Park Place are not extended or renewed in adequate amounts, LVH may be required to reduce or suspend LVH’s capital investment activities, which could violate the Purchase and Sale Agreement.
Subsequent to the closing of the Acquisition, the Company expects that its cash flows from operations, together with cash on hand and available borrowings, including the Goldman Term Loan and Hilton Term Loan, will be adequate to fund its activities, including the capital expenditures that the Company plans to make over the foreseeable future. However, no assurances can be made that such sources of financing will be sufficient to fund such activities and capital expenditures and the Company’s debt, including the Goldman Term Loan and Hilton Term Loan, will materially restrict future borrowings.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
LVH is not subject to any off-balance sheet arrangements which it believes will have a material adverse impact on its financial condition. The Company is not currently subject to any off-balance sheet arrangements which it believes will have a material adverse impact on its financial condition.
-29-
Contractual Commitments
At December 31, 2003, LVH had approximately $39,993,000 in amounts due to Park Place and affiliated companies. LVH had no third-party debt outstanding at December 31, 2003. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Company will not assume any inter-company payables.
LVH is obligated under other contracts for various items such as advertising, equipment maintenance and employment.
The actual maturities by year for LVH’s debt and contractual obligations as of December 31, 2003 are shown in the table below (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments Due By Year
|
| | 2004
| | 2005
| | 2006
| | 2007
| | 2008 and Thereafter
| | Total
|
Due to affiliated companies | | $ | 39,993 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 39,993 |
Other | | | 3,692 | | | 1,348 | | | 292 | | | 38 | | | — | | | 5,370 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Total | | $ | 43,685 | | $ | 1,348 | | $ | 292 | | $ | 38 | | $ | — | | $ | 45,363 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
The Company does not currently have any debt or contractual obligations and the contractual obligations set forth in the table above will not carry forward to the Company upon the closing of the Acquisition.
There is intense competition in the gaming industry. The construction of new properties or the enhancement or expansion of existing properties in the market in which LVH operates and the Company intends to operate on a post-Acquisition basis could have a negative impact on its business in that market.
Several of LVH’s competitors and the Company’s expected competitors in Las Vegas, Nevada have completed expansion projects or are currently expanding their operations with additional hotel towers, which, when and if completed, will add a significant number of new hotel rooms to the Las Vegas market. In addition, another competitor is constructing a new 2,700-room hotel casino expected to be completed in April 2005. The business may be adversely impacted (i) by the additional gaming and room capacity generated by this increased competition in Las Vegas and/or (ii) by the expansion of Native American gaming in California and Arizona.
The business at the hotel casino will also be adversely affected if gaming were to be newly legalized or expanded under the laws of any state or locale located near the Hotel. Particularly, the legalization of gaming operations in locations near Las Vegas will negatively affect the Hotel located there.
Terrorism and the uncertainty of war, as well as other factors affecting discretionary consumer spending, may harm LVH’s and/or the Company’s operating results.
The strength and profitability of our business depends on consumer demand for hotel casino resorts and gaming in general and for the type of amenities the Hotel offers. A general downturn in economic conditions and changes in consumer preferences or discretionary consumer spending could harm the Hotel’s business. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and ongoing terrorist and war activities in the United States and elsewhere have had a negative impact on travel and leisure expenditures, including lodging, gaming (in some jurisdictions) and tourism. An extended period of reduced discretionary spending and/or disruptions or declines in airline travel and business conventions could significantly harm our operations.
Regulation and Taxes
The gaming industry is highly regulated and LVH must and the Company will be required to adhere to various regulations and maintain their licenses to continue their operations. The ownership, management, and operation of gaming facilities are subject to extensive federal, state and/or local laws, rules, and regulations, which are administered by the relevant regulatory agency or agencies. These laws, rules, and regulations generally concern the responsibility, financial
-30-
stability, and character of the owners and managers of gaming operations as well as persons financially interested or involved in gaming operations. The regulatory environment may change in the future and any such change could have a material adverse effect on LVH’s or the Company’s results of operations.
The gaming industry provides a significant source of tax revenue for the state, county, and municipality in which LVH operates. Occasionally, proposals are made by federal and state legislators to amend tax laws affecting the gaming industry. Changes in such laws, if any, would have a material effect on LVH’s or the Company’s results of operations.
The general economic downturn has increased the need for state and local governments to fund budget deficits in the state where LVH and the Company have operations. In partial response, the state legislature in Nevada has recently increased existing taxes and enacted new taxes on businesses including hotel casinos. They may consider proposals in the future to increase existing taxes and/or enact new taxes on businesses operating within the state, or in some cases by specifically targeting additional tax measures at hotel casinos. These taxes may be significant and could adversely affect LVH’s and/or the Company’s results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of LVH’s significant accounting policies can be found in Note 2 of the Notes to the Financial Statements. LVH’s preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires LVH to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Significant among those estimates are the useful lives and potential impairment of long-term assets, such as buildings and equipment; the adequacy of LVH’s allowance for uncollectible receivables; and the amount of litigation and self-insurance reserves. These estimated amounts are based on LVH’s best judgments using both historical information and known trends in LVH and in our industry. Because of the uncertainty inherent in any estimate, it is likely that the actual results could differ from the initial estimates, and the differences could be material. The policies and estimates discussed below are considered to be the most significant.
Long-Lived Assets
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Judgments are made in determining if or when assets have been impaired and the estimated useful lives of assets. The accuracy of these estimates affects the depreciation expense recognized in LVH’s results of operations. LVH assigns lives to its assets based on its standard policy, which LVH believes represents the useful life of each category of asset. The carrying values of its long-lived assets are reviewed when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Management assesses the possibility of an asset impairment by using estimates of future cash flows which are affected by current operating results, trends and prospects, as well as the effect of obsolescence, demand, competition and other economic factors.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
LVH allows for an estimated amount of receivables that may not be collected. LVH estimates an allowance for doubtful accounts using a specific formula applied to aged receivables as well as a specific review of large balances. Historical experience is considered, as are customer relationships, in determining specific reserves.
Litigation Reserves
LVH assesses its exposures to loss contingencies including legal matters and provides for an exposure if it is judged to be probable and estimable. If the actual loss from a contingency differs from management’s estimate, operating results could be impacted.
Self-insurance Reserves
LVH is self-insured for various levels of general liability, workers’ compensation, and non-union employee medical insurance coverage. Insurance claims and reserves include accruals of estimated settlements for known claims, as
-31-
well as accrued estimates of incurred but not reported claims. In estimating these costs, LVH considers its historical claims experience and make judgments about the expected levels of costs per claim. Changes in health care costs, accident frequency and severity and other factors can materially affect the estimate for these liabilities.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 150,Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity and requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). LVH adopted SFAS No. 150, which did not have a material impact on its financial position and results of operations.
In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003) (“FIN 46R”), clarifying FIN 46 and exempting certain entities from the provisions of FIN 46R. Generally, application of FIN 46R is required in financial statements of public entities that have interests in structures commonly referred to as special-purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003, and, for other types of variable interest entities for periods ending after March 15, 2004. FIN 46R addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities that either: (1) do not have sufficient equity investment at risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or (2) the company will hold a significant variable interest in, or have significant involvement with, an existing variable interest entity. During the fourth quarter of 2003, LVH adopted the provisions of FIN 46R related to special-purpose entities, which did not have a material impact on LVH’s financial position and results of operations. LVH will adopt the provisions of FIN 46R related to other types of variable interest entities during the first quarter of 2004.
In December 2003, the FASB issued an amendment to SFAS No. 132,Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits-an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, and 106. SFAS No. 132 establishes standards for how a company discloses information about pension plans and other post-retirement benefit plans. During the fourth quarter of 2003, LVH adopted the amended SFAS No. 132, which did not have a material impact on its financial position and results of operations.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. LVH is exposed to no such market risks. Following the closing of the Acquisition, the Company may have market risk associated with funds that may be borrowed to finance the Acquisition and pay related fees and expenses.
-32-
Prior to the Acquisition, the Company will own no property. Upon the closing of the Acquisition, the Company will acquire substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of LVH.
Overview of Las Vegas Hilton
The Las Vegas Hilton Hotel and Casino is located one block east of the Las Vegas Strip (the “Strip”) on approximately fifty-nine acres of land between Paradise Road and Joe W. Brown Drive adjacent to the Las Vegas Convention Center. It has approximately 2,950 hotel rooms, an approximately 74,000 square feet casino with approximately fifty table games and 1,400 slot machines, a race and sports book, twelve restaurants, approximately 3,100 parking spaces, approximately 225,000 square feet of meeting/convention space, a 1,600-seat showroom, a night club, retail outlets, an outdoor pool and a spa and health club.
Certain of the assets to be acquired by LVH in the Acquisition, including the Hotel, will secure the Goldman Term Loan. It is currently anticipated that the Hilton Term Loan may be secured by certain of such assets or other collateral but it will be subordinated to the Goldman Term Loan.
ITEM 4 | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT. |
All of the current outstanding membership interests in the Company are held by Holdings.
The Company has not determined the final post-Acquisition distribution of the Class A Units and the Class B Units. As such, it is not possible to include a table setting forth (1) the expected beneficial ownership of the Company’s Class A Units (the only class of voting securities of the Company) immediately prior to the closing of the Acquisition by all persons who are expected to be beneficial owners of more than five percent of the Class A Units, (2) the expected beneficial ownership of the Company’s Class A Units and Class B Units immediately prior to the closing of the Acquisition by each expected manager and executive officer of the Company or (3) the expected beneficial ownership of the Company’s Class A Units and Class B Units immediately prior to the closing of the Acquisition by all persons expected to be managers and executive officers, as a group. The summary below describes the current information known by the Company with respect to the expected distribution of the Class A Units and Class B Units on or prior to the closing of the Acquisition. Note that the Company shall include a table setting forth the ownership of the Class A Units and Class B Units in filings subsequent to the closing of the Acquisition.
In connection with and immediately prior to the Acquisition, the Company expects to issue Class A Units to Coinvestment VoteCo and VoteCo on a pro rata basis in proportion to the equity contributions made by each entity. The Company expects to issue Class B Units to Co-Investment Partners and Holdings on a pro rata basis in proportion to the equity contributions made by each entity. Messrs. Barrack and Ribis are the managers of Coinvestment VoteCo, and thereby each may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of any Class A Units owned of record by Coinvestment VoteCo. Messrs. Barrack and Ribis each disclaim beneficial ownership of such Class A Units. Mr. Barrack is the manager of VoteCo, and thereby may be deemed to have beneficial ownership of any Class A Units owned of record by VoteCo. Mr. Barrack disclaims beneficial ownership of such Class A Units.
As of March 10, 2004 and in connection with the Acquisition, the Company has entered into employment arrangements and letter agreements with certain executive officers of the Company including Messrs. Prieto, Schaffhauser and Ciancimino. The Company intends to enter into additional letter agreements with Messrs. Prieto, Schaffhauser and Ciancimino prior to the closing of the Acquisition. The terms, including compensation, of such employment arrangements and letter agreements are disclosed in this Registration Statement. See “Item 7. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.” Pursuant to the employment arrangements and letter agreements, the Company intends to grant options to purchase Class A Units and Class B Units, subject to the terms of the employment arrangements and other relevant documents, including the equity compensation plan currently contemplated by the Company. However, the Company
-33-
will not grant to any one of the executive officers an option to purchase more than 5% of the Class A Units outstanding at the time such option is granted. Additionally, the letter agreements pursuant to which Messrs. Prieto, Schaffhauser and Ciancimino will each receive an option to purchase Class A Units will not be executed until after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
The Company expects that the Class A Units held by VoteCo and Coinvestment VoteCo will be subject to the VoteCo Transfer Restriction Agreement and the Coinvestment VoteCo Transfer Restriction Agreement, respectively.
Pursuant to the VoteCo Transfer Restriction Agreement, which the Company expects will be executed at the time of the closing of the Acquisition, Holdings will have the right to acquire such shares on each occasion that Holdings proposes to transfer any shares of Class B Units held by it to a proposed purchaser who, in connection with such proposed transfer, has obtained all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, consents, waivers, orders, findings or suitability or other approvals required to be obtained from, and has made all filings, notices or declarations required to be made with, all gaming authorities under all applicable gaming laws (an “Approved Sale”). In such event, Holdings shall have an option to purchase from VoteCo the number of shares of Class A Units equal to the product of (a) the number of shares of Class A Units held by VoteCo and (b) the fraction whose numerator is the number of shares of Class B Units proposed to be sold by Holdings in the Approved Sale and whose denominator is the number of shares of Class B Units held by Holdings.
Pursuant to the Coinvestment VoteCo Transfer Restriction Agreement, which the Company expects will be executed at the time of the closing of the Acquisition, Co-Investment Partners will have the right to acquire such shares on each occasion that Co-Investment Partners proposes to transfer any shares of Class B Units held by it to a proposed purchaser in connection with an Approved Sale. In such event, Co-Investment Partners shall have an option to purchase from Coinvestment VoteCo the number of shares of Class A Units equal to the product of (a) the number of shares of Class A Units held by Coinvestment VoteCo and (b) the fraction whose numerator is the number of shares of Class B Units proposed to be sold by Co-Investment Partners in the Approved Sale and whose denominator is the number of shares of Class B Units held by Co-Investment Partners.
-34-
ITEM 3 | DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS. |
The directors and executive officers of the Company as of the closing of the Acquisition are expected to be as follows:
| | | | |
NAME
| | AGE
| | POSITION
|
Thomas J. Barrack, Jr. | | 57 | | Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Nicholas L. Ribis | | 59 | | Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Rodolfo Prieto | | 59 | | Chief Executive Officer and General Manager |
Robert Schaffhauser | | 57 | | Executive Vice President, Finance |
Kenneth M. Ciancimino | | 43 | | Executive Vice President, Administration |
THOMAS J. BARRACK, JR. is expected to serve as a Director and Chairman of the Board of the Company. He currently serves as a Manager of the Company and is expected to resign as Manager upon the closing of the Acquisition. Mr. Barrack also holds a majority membership interest in Coinvestment VoteCo and all of the membership interests in VoteCo. Mr. Barrack has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of each of Colony Capital, LLC (“Colony Capital”) and Colony Advisors, LLC (“Colony Advisors”) since their organization in August 1992 and September 1991, respectively. Colony Capital and Colony Advisors are international real estate investment and management firms. Mr. Barrack is a Director of Continental Airlines, Inc., a commercial airline and First Republic Bank, a full-service private banking, investment management and trust services company.
NICHOLAS L. RIBIS currently serves as a Manager of the Company and is expected to serve as a Director of the Company upon the closing of the Acquisition. Mr. Ribis currently is the Vice Chairman of Resorts International Hotel & Casino, Inc., which owns and operates Resorts Atlantic City, a casino hotel in Atlantic City, New Jersey. Mr. Ribis served as President, Chief Executive Officer and director of Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts from 1995 to 2000. Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts engages in investments in real estate and gaming facilities. From January 1993 to January 1995, Mr. Ribis was Chairman of the Casino Association of New Jersey, and has served for seven years on the board of trustees of the CRDA.
RODOLFO PRIETO is expected to serve as the Chief Executive Officer and General Manager of the Company, where he will be responsible for the hotel and casino’s day to day operations and leading a staff of over 4,000 employees. Mr. Prieto has had over forty years of work experience in the entertainment, hospitality, and gaming industries. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Prieto was Senior Vice President of Operations for Boyd Gaming Corporation (“Boyd”), a highly respected gaming corporation that owns twelve properties in the United States. During his tenure at Boyd, Mr. Prieto substantially contributed to the expansion, increased revenues, and productivity of the organization. From 1995 to 1999, Mr. Prieto worked at the Trump Taj Mahal Casino in Atlantic City. Initially serving as Executive Vice President of Operations, Mr. Prieto became President and Chief Executive Officer of the Taj Mahal for the four years prior to his move to Las Vegas in 2000. Prior to joining the Trump Organization, Mr. Prieto served as Executive Vice President of the Tropicana Resort in Las Vegas. At Tropicana, Mr. Prieto contributed to its repositioning and transformation to a major slot revenue producer in the late 1980’s. Mr. Prieto attended the Universidad Autonoma de Guadalajara in Guadalajara, Mexico from 1960 to 1963. He then attended La Salle University in Mexico City, where he studied Business Administration. In addition, Mr. Prieto has attended the Holiday Inn University in Memphis, Tennessee, where he studied innkeeping and has attended numerous seminars on management, finance and accounting. Mr. Prieto is a member of the Nevada Hotel and Motel Association.
ROBERT SCHAFFHAUSER is expected to serve as the Executive Vice President, Finance and the Company’s chief financial officer, where he will direct the hotel and casino’s treasury and project finance functions. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Schaffhauser was Senior Vice President of KMA Direct Communications, Inc. where he was responsible for the business planning and administrative functions (including finance, legal human resources, information technology, risk management, and purchasing) relating to the operation of a boutique advertising agency. From 1993 to 2000, Mr. Schaffhauser worked for the Trump Organization, most recently as Executive Vice President of the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino, where he was responsible for the business planning, credit, and financial functions relating to the operation of the casino, 1,500 room hotel, retail outlets, and an entertainment venue. Mr. Schaffhauser also served as Executive Vice President of Trump’s Castle Casino Resort & Marina where he managed the financial functions of the
-35-
hotel and casino complex. In addition, Mr. Schaffhauser was an Internal Consultant for Trump Hotels & Casinos, Inc., where he was responsible for research and analysis of gaming opportunities in jurisdictions other than Atlantic City. In this capacity, he prepared proposals and presentations, negotiated financing, and participated in post award planning. Mr. Schaffhauser holds a Bachelor’s degree in Accounting from Rutgers University and has completed graduate coursework in economics, taxes, and finance at Seton Hall University. He is licensed both as a Certified Public Accountant and as a Casino Key Employee in the State of New Jersey.
KENNETH M. CIANCIMINO is expected to serve as the Executive Vice President, Administration and the Company’s chief administrative officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Ciancimino served as Vice President of Business Development and Strategic Planning for The Media and Marketing Group, a full-service advertising, marketing and communications agency specializing in casino gambling. Mr. Ciancimino, based in Las Vegas, was the executive responsible for business development and strategic planning for the agency, which has offices in New Jersey, Las Vegas, and Indiana. From 1993 to 2000, Mr. Ciancimino served in various positions within Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc. As Vice President of Corporate Affairs, he was primarily responsible for the investor relations function of the NYSE company with $1.4 billion in revenues and 16,000 employees. In addition, Mr. Ciancimino was responsible for the analysis of potential casino development opportunities in both existing and emerging gaming jurisdictions worldwide. This analysis included market demographics, financing opportunities, regulatory issues, and political issues. In addition, Mr. Ciancimino assisted the President and CEO on company corporate finance projects that included debt refinancing, equity offerings, and other corporate financial strategic plans. Within Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc., Mr. Ciancimino also served as Executive Director of Corporate Affairs, Business Analysis Manager, and as a Development Analyst. Mr. Ciancimino received a Bachelor’s degree in Psychology and Sociology from Rutgers University, and an MBA in Finance and Management from Seton Hall University. While at Seton Hall, Mr. Ciancimino served as the Commander of Cadets and was a Distinguished Military Graduate. While a member of the United States Army Reserve, Mr. Ciancimino served as Company Commander of Company A, 2-102 50th Armored Division.
The Company currently is a newly formed entity and has conducted no operations other than in connection the Purchase and Sale Agreement. Currently, the Company has no committees, as such, there is no audit committee nor an audit committee financial expert. The Company paid no compensation to officers, directors or managers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.
ITEM 6 | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. |
In connection with the Acquisition, the Company has entered into employment arrangements and letter agreements with Messrs. Prieto, Schaffhauser and Ciancimino. Because the Company may enter into employment arrangements with additional executive officers prior to the closing of the Acquisitions, the Company is unable to determine the aggregate compensation to be paid to its executive officers in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
ITEM 7 | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS. |
Employment Arrangements
Employment Arrangements
The Company intends to enter into an agreement with Mr. Ribis pursuant to which he will serve as the Vice Chairman of the Company. The terms and conditions of such agreement are currently being discussed and have not yet been finalized.
The Company entered into an employment agreement and a letter agreement with Mr. Prieto for a five-year term, with one-year renewals after the completion of the initial five-year term and the Company intends to enter into an additional letter agreement with Mr. Prieto prior to the closing of the Acquisition. Mr. Prieto will receive a base salary of $650,000 during 2004, and his base salary will increase by $50,000 each year during the following three years of the initial term, and shall not be less than $800,000 in the fifth year of the term. As an inducement to enter into the employment agreement, Mr. Prieto will receive a signing bonus of $130,000, which will not be payable until shortly after the completion of the Acquisition. Mr. Prieto will participate in the Company’s annual bonus plan, which provides for the payment of annual bonus awards based on the achievement of performance goals established by the Company’s Board of
-36-
Directors; provided, that Mr. Prieto’s annual bonus payment shall not be less than $100,000 in any year during the term of his employment. Mr. Prieto is also eligible to receive a cash payment of up to $350,000, if he is employed by the Company on February 26, 2007, to compensate Mr. Prieto for stock options forfeited by him in connection with the termination of his employment with his previous employer. The actual amount of such payment will be based on the closing price of the stock of his former employer on such date. Mr. Prieto is eligible to participate in the Company’s medical, dental, retirement and other standard benefit plans maintained by the Company. In addition, the Company will fund up to $55,415 annually for the premium payments associated with maintaining a whole-life insurance policy for the benefit of Mr. Prieto.
After the effective date of this Registration Statement, Mr. Prieto will be granted an option (the “Option”) to purchase 1.5% of the Company’s Class A Units and Class B Units that are issued and outstanding as of the date on which the Acquisition is completed. Additionally, the letter agreement pursuant to which Mr. Prieto will receive an option to purchase 1.5% of the Company’s Class A Units will not be executed until after the effective date of this Registration Statement. Subject to Mr. Prieto’s continued employment with the Company, the Class A Units and Class B Units subject to the Option shall vest as to 33.33% of the total number of Class A Units and Class B Units awarded on each of the first three anniversaries of the date on which the Option is granted. The Option shall be granted pursuant to an equity compensation plan to be established by the Company, and shall be subject to such other terms and conditions that may be determined by the Company.
In the event the Company terminates Mr. Prieto’s employment without cause, he will receive a severance payment equal to at least 18 months of base salary, a prorated portion of the annual bonus, and continued participation in the Company’s medical plan for a period not to exceed 18 months. Mr. Prieto would be entitled to certain severance payments in the event of his death or termination due to a disability. Mr. Prieto will generally be bound by certain restrictive covenants. Specifically, should Mr. Prieto voluntarily terminate his employment or should the Company terminate his employment for cause, then Mr. Prieto will be prohibited from competing against the Company for a period of 6 months following his termination. Also, if Mr. Prieto’s employment is terminated with or without cause, he is prohibited from soliciting the Company’s employees for a period of 6 months following his termination. Mr. Prieto is also restricted from soliciting the Company’s clients for a period of one year following termination of employment for any reason. In addition, in the event Mr. Prieto’s employment is terminated in connection with a termination of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, and the parties do not consummate the Acquisition, Mr. Prieto shall receive a lump sum severance payment of $1,350,000.
The Company has also entered into employment agreements and letter agreements with Messrs. Schaffhauser and Ciancimino and intends to enter into additional letter agreements with Messrs. Schaffhauser and Ciancimino prior to closing of the Acquisition. The employment agreements for Messrs. Schaffhauser and Ciancimino are for an initial term of three years and are subject to one-year extensions. The executives will receive base salaries of $300,000 and $270,000, respectively, which may be subject to annual adjustments. Messrs. Schaffhauser and Ciancimino will participate in the Company’s annual bonus plan and receive awards, if any, based on the achievement of performance goals established by the Company’s Board of Directors. The executives are eligible to participate in the Company’s medical, dental, retirement and other standard benefit plans maintained by the Company. The Company will pay the full cost the premiums associated with Mr. Ciancimino’s coverage under the Company’s group medical plan during his term of employment.
After the effective date of this Registration Statement, Messrs. Schaffhauser and Ciancimino will each be granted an Option to purchase 0.5% of the Company’s Class A Units and 0.5% of the Company’s Class B Units that are issued and outstanding as of the date on which the Acquisition is completed. Additionally, the letter agreements pursuant to which Messrs. Schaffhauser and Ciancimino will each receive an option to purchase 0.5% of the Company’s Class A Units will not be executed until after the effective date of this Registration Statement. The Options shall vest at the same rate as provided under Mr. Prieto’s employment agreement and letter agreements. The Options shall be granted under the equity compensation plan to be adopted by the Company, and shall be subject to such other terms and conditions as may be determined by the Company.
In the event of a termination of employment by the Company without cause, the terminated executive would be entitled to receive a severance payment equal to the executive’s base salary for the remainder of the unexpired term and continued participation in the Company’s medical plan for a period of not more than 6 months.
-37-
Messrs. Schaffhauser and Ciancimino are also bound by certain restrictive covenants following termination of employment. Each executive is prohibited from competing against the Company for a period of 6 months, should the executive voluntarily terminate his employment or the Company terminate the executive’s employment for cause. Also, each executive is prohibited from soliciting the Company’s employees and clients for one year following termination of employment for any reason.
Holders Agreement
VoteCo, Coinvestment VoteCo, Holdings and Co-Investment Partners intend to enter into a Holders Agreement prior to or concurrently with the closing of the Acquisition with respect to the Membership Units held by each. The terms of the Holders Agreement are currently under negotiation. The capital structure is subject to change based on prevailing circumstances at the time and certain changes may necessitate changes to the Holders Agreement.
Indemnification
The Purchase and Sale Agreement provides that the Company will provide directors and officers liability insurance coverage to the current directors and officers of LVH for a term of six years following the closing of the Acquisition. In addition, the Operating Agreement contains indemnity provisions pursuant to which the Company will indemnify the directors and officers under certain circumstances. See “Item 12. Indemnification of Officers and Directors.”
Transfer Restriction Agreements
At the time of the closing of the Acquisition, the Company expects the following transfer restriction agreements will be executed: (a) the Coinvestment Transfer Restriction Agreement and (b) the VoteCo Transfer Restriction Agreement.
The Company’s Class A Units to be issued to Coinvestment VoteCo will be subject to the Coinvestment Transfer Restriction Agreement, which the Company expects will provide, among other things, that:
| • | Co-Investment Partners has the right to acquire Class A Units from Coinvestment VoteCo on each occasion that Class B Units held by Co-Investment Partners would be transferred to a proposed purchaser who, in connection with such proposed sale, has obtained all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, consents, waivers, orders, findings of suitability or other approvals required to be obtained from, and has made all findings, notices or declarations required to be made with, all gaming authorities under all applicable gaming laws, |
| • | A specific purchase price will be paid to acquire the Class A Units from Coinvestment VoteCo, and |
| • | Coinvestment VoteCo will not transfer ownership of Class A Units owned by it except pursuant to such option of Co-Investment Partners. |
The Company’s Class A Units to be issued to VoteCo will be subject to the VoteCo Transfer Restriction Agreement, which the Company expects will provide, among other things, that:
| • | Holdings has the right to acquire Class A Units from VoteCo on each occasion that Class B Units held by Holdings would be transferred to a proposed purchaser who, in connection with such proposed sale, has obtained all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, consents, waivers, orders, findings of suitability or other approvals required to be obtained from, and has made all findings, notices or declarations required to be made with, all gaming authorities under all applicable gaming laws, |
| • | A specific purchase price will be paid to acquire the Class A Units from VoteCo, and |
-38-
| • | VoteCo will not transfer ownership of Class A Units owned by it except pursuant to such option of Holdings. |
The Company, Holdings, VoteCo, Co-Investment Partners and Coinvestment VoteCo are not a party to any litigation and to its knowledge, no action, suit or proceedings against it has been threatened by any person.
LVH is a defendant in various lawsuits relating to routine matters incidental to its business. Management of LVH does not believe that the outcome of any such litigation, in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on LVH.
ITEM 9 | MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT’S EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS. |
No established public trading market exists for the Company’s equity. There are no plans, proposals, arrangements or understandings with any person with regard to the development of a trading market in any of the Company’s equity.
There are no outstanding options or warrants to purchase, or securities convertible into, the Company’s common equity. All membership interests of the Company’s common equity are subject to sale pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), subject to the limitations set forth therein. The Company has not agreed with any security holder to register any of its common equity for sale by any security holder. The Company does not currently propose to publicly offer any membership interests of its common equity.
As of the closing of the Acquisition, it is currently contemplated that the Company will have 2 holders of record of its Class A Units and 2 holders of record of its Class B Units.
The Company does not pay, and does not anticipate paying in the foreseeable future, any dividends or making any distributions on its common equity.
There are no securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans and the Company does not anticipate authorizing securities for issuance under the equity compensation plan in the foreseeable future.
ITEM 10 | RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES. |
In connection with the execution of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Company issued membership interests having an aggregate value of $15 million to Holdings. Upon execution of the Company’s Operating Agreement, such membership interests will be converted to Class B Units.
If the Company utilizes the Acquisition Financing, it expects to issue Class A Units to Coinvestment VoteCo and VoteCo and Class B Units to Co-Investment Partners and Holdings, on a pro rata basis in proportion to the equity contributions made by each entity, for aggregate consideration of approximately $110 million in cash. Such issuances are subject to certain conditions. See “Item 1. Business—The Company.” The Acquisition Financing and capital structure are subject to change based on events and circumstances that occur on or prior to the closing of the Acquisition.
Each of the foregoing issuances is expected to be exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
ITEM 11 | DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED. |
General
Prior to the closing of the Acquisition, the Company expects to execute the Operating Agreement, which creates two classes of membership units, the Class A Units and the Class B Units. At the closing of the Acquisition, Class A
-39-
Units and Class B Units are expected to be outstanding. The Company expects to issue Class A Units to Coinvestment VoteCo and VoteCo and Class B Units to Co-Investment Partners and Holdings on a pro rata basis in proportion to the equity contributions made by each entity. The Class A Units are the only class of the Company’s equity being registered pursuant to this Registration Statement.
Class A Units and Class B Units
Pursuant to the Operating Agreement, Holders of Class A Units will be entitled to one vote per unit on all matters to be voted on by the members of the Company and will not be entitled to cumulative voting for the election of directors. Except as otherwise expressly required by law, holders of Class B Units will have no right to vote on any matters to be voted on by the members of the Company. Holders of Class A Units and Class B Units will have no preemptive rights, no other rights to subscribe for additional units of the Company, no conversion rights and no redemption rights, will not benefit from any sinking fund and will not have any preferential rights upon a liquidation. Holders of Class A Units and Class B Units will be entitled to share ratably, in distributions when, as and if distributed by the Company, as provided in the Company’s Operating Agreement.
No securities issued by the Company and no interest, claim or charge therein or thereto may be transferred, except in accordance with the provisions of the Nevada Gaming Control Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder. Any transfer in violation thereof is void until the Company ceases to be subject to the jurisdiction of the Nevada Commission or the Nevada Commission approves the transfer.
Restrictions on Business Combinations and Corporate Control
RESTRICTIONS IMPOSED BY NEVADA AUTHORITIES ON MEMBERSHIP UNITS OWNED BY VOTECO, COINVESTMENT VOTECO, CO-INVESTMENT PARTNERS OR HOLDINGS
It is expected that the Final Order may (1) prohibit Holdings, Co-Investment Partners, VoteCo, Coinvestment VoteCo or their respective affiliates from selling, assigning, transferring, pledging or otherwise disposing of Membership Units or any other security convertible into or exchangeable from Class A Units or Class B Units, without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission, and (2) prohibit the Company from declaring cash dividends or distributions on any class of membership unit of the Company beneficially owned in whole or in part by Holdings, Co-Investment Partners, VoteCo, Coinvestment VoteCo or their respective affiliates, without the prior approval of the Nevada Commission. The Final Order would become effective upon issuance by the Nevada Commission.
The Nevada Board and Clark County will investigate the Company’s acquisition of the assets of LVH while the SEC reviews this Form 10.
ITEM 12 | INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS. |
The Company’s Operating Agreement will contain provisions for indemnification of the members of the Board and officers of the Company and their respective affiliates (the “Indemnitees”). The Operating Agreement will require the Company to indemnify the Indemnitees, subject to the Nevada Revised Statutes, against any losses, liabilities or expenses incurred by the Indemnitee in connection with any action, suit or proceeding, except an action brought by or on behalf of the Company, and by reason of the fact that the Indemnitee is or was serving as a manager, member, employee, agent or organizer of the Company or in the same capacity of any other entity at the request of the Company if the Indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner which he or she reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the Company and with respect to any criminal action, the Indemnitee had no reasonable cause to believe the conduct was unlawful. In addition, an Indemnitee will not be liable to the Company or to any member of the Company for any act or omission based upon errors of judgment or other fault in connection with the business or affairs of the Company, if the Indemnitee acted in good faith and in a manner which he or she reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the Company and with respect to any criminal action, the Indemnitee had no reasonable cause to believe the conduct was unlawful.
-40-
The Board of Directors of the Company may rely on agents in the agents’ areas of expertise and the Board of Directors’ good faith reliance on such agents will be full and complete protection for any action taken or omitted by the Board of Directors based on the agents’ opinion. The Board of Directors will not be responsible for the acts or omissions of an agent or employee of the Company, the Board of Directors, or any of their affiliates, if the Board of Directors uses due care in selecting its agents and employees.
Subject to relevant provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the Company will advance funds for legal fees incurred by the Indemnitee if the following conditions are satisfied: (1) the legal action relates to the performance of duties or services by the Indemnitee for the Company; and (2) the Indemnitee agrees to repay such advances if it is determined that the Indemnitee is not entitled to indemnification under the Operating Agreement.
The Indemnitees’ rights under the Operating Agreement will not preclude any other right to which the Indemnitees may be entitled under law. The Indemnitee may satisfy any right of indemnity or reimbursement only from the assets of the Company and no member of the Company will be personally liable to any claim for indemnity or reimbursement.
ITEM 13 | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. |
The financial statements and supplementary data are as set forth in the “Index to Financial Statements” on page F-1.
ITEM 14 | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. |
Not applicable.
ITEM 15 | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS. |
(a) List separately all financial statements filed.
See “Index to Financial Statements.”
(b) Exhibits.
-41-
| | |
EXHIBIT NUMBER
| | |
2.1 | | Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of December 24, 2003, by and among Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC, LVH Corporation and Park Place Entertainment Corporation |
| |
3.1 | | Articles of Organization, dated as of December 18, 2003, for Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC and subsequent amendments thereto |
| |
3.2 | | Operating Agreement, dated as of December 22, 2003, for Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC |
| |
3.3 | | Form of Amended and Restated Operating Agreement for Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC |
| |
10.1 | | Deposit Escrow Agreement, dated as of December 24, 2003, by and among LVH Corporation, Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC and Nevada Title Company |
| |
10.2 | | Form of Coinvestment Transfer Restriction Agreement by and among Mr. Barrack, Mr. Ribis, Co-Investment Partners and Coinvestment VoteCo |
| |
10.3 | | Form of Transfer Restriction Agreement by and among Mr. Barrack, Holdings and VoteCo |
| |
10.4 | | Employment Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2004, by and between Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC and Rodolfo Prieto |
| |
10.5 | | Employment Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2004, by and between Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC and Robert Schaffhauser |
| |
10.6 | | Employment Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2004, by and between Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC and Kenneth Ciancimino |
| |
10.7 | | Letter Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2004, by and between Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC and Rodolfo Prieto |
| |
10.8 | | Letter Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2004, by and between Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC and Robert Schaffhauser |
| |
10.9 | | Letter Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2004, by and between Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC and Kenneth Ciancimino |
-42-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | COLONY RESORTS LVH ACQUISITIONS, LLC |
Date: March15, 2004 | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | By: | | /s/ Nicholas L. Ribis |
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | Name: Nicholas L. Ribis Title: Manager |
-43-
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following audited financial statements of LVH Corporation and audited financial statements of Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC are presented herein on the page indicated:
| | | | |
| |
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR LVH CORPORATION | | |
| | |
| | INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT | | F-2 |
| | |
| | BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002 | | F-3 |
| | |
| | STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002 AND 2001 | | F-4 |
| | |
| | STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002 AND 2001 | | F-5 |
| | |
| | NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002 AND 2001 | | F-6 |
| |
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR COLONY RESORTS LVH ACQUISITIONS, LLC | | |
| | |
| | REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS | | F-17 |
| | |
| | BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2003 | | F-18 |
| | |
| | STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE PERIOD FROM DECEMBER 18, 2003 (DATE OF INCEPTION) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2003 | | F-19 |
| | |
| | STATEMENT OF MEMBERS’ DEFICIT FOR THE PERIOD FROM DECEMBER 18, 2003 (DATE OF INCEPTION) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2003 | | F-20 |
| | |
| | STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD FROM DECEMBER 18, 2003 (DATE OF INCEPTION) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2003 | | F-21 |
| | |
| | NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | | F-22 |
F-1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
To LVH Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of LVH Corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of Caesars Entertainment, Inc., formerly known as Park Place Entertainment Corporation (“Caesars”)) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related statements of operations and accumulated deficit and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of LVH Corporation as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared from the separate records maintained by the Company and may not necessarily be indicative of the conditions that would have existed or the results of operations if the Company had been operated as an unaffiliated company. Portions of certain expenses represent charges and allocations made from home-office items applicable to Caesars Entertainment, Inc. as a whole or transactions with other wholly owned subsidiaries of Caesars Entertainment, Inc., most of which are transacted at amounts which approximate “cost” rather than market rates for similar transactions with companies outside the controlled group.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Las Vegas, Nevada
March 10, 2004
F-2
LVH CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEETS (In Thousands, except share amounts)
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2003
| | | 2002
| |
Assets | | | | | | | | |
| | |
CURRENT ASSETS: | | | | | | | | |
Cash and equivalents | | $ | 12,734 | | | $ | 15,250 | |
Accounts receivable, net | | | 21,764 | | | | 12,114 | |
Inventories | | | 2,472 | | | | 2,277 | |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 3,894 | | | | 4,262 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| | |
Total current assets | | | 40,864 | | | | 33,903 | |
| | |
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net | | | 166,159 | | | | 172,915 | |
OTHER ASSETS | | | 188 | | | | 438 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 207,211 | | | $ | 207,256 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| | |
Liabilities and stockholder’s equity | | | | | | | | |
| | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and bank overdrafts | | $ | 4,935 | | | $ | 4,027 | |
Due to affiliated companies | | | 39,993 | | | | 34,195 | |
Accrued expenses | | | 43,499 | | | | 34,710 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total current liabilities | | | 88,427 | | | | 72,932 | |
| | |
OTHER LIABILITIES | | | 72 | | | | 87 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total liabilities | | | 88,499 | | | | 73,019 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| | |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | | | | | | | | |
| | |
STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY: | | | | | | | | |
Common stock ($1.00 par value, 25,000 shares authorized, 1,000 shares issued and outstanding) | | | 1 | | | | 1 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 332,747 | | | | 332,747 | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (214,036 | ) | | | (198,511 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total stockholder’s equity | | | 118,712 | | | | 134,237 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity | | $ | 207,211 | | | $ | 207,256 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-3
LVH CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT (In Thousands)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002 AND 2001
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2003
| | | 2002
| | | 2001
| |
Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Casino | | $ | 75,864 | | | $ | 81,412 | | | $ | 82,991 | |
Rooms | | | 72,686 | | | | 68,058 | | | | 75,076 | |
Food and beverage | | | 47,396 | | | | 43,072 | | | | 46,658 | |
Other revenue | | | 18,065 | | | | 23,109 | | | | 22,117 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| | | 214,011 | | | | 215,651 | | | | 226,842 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
Casino | | | 54,639 | | | | 52,459 | | | | 63,966 | |
Rooms | | | 25,929 | | | | 23,899 | | | | 25,738 | |
Food and beverage | | | 49,105 | | | | 45,599 | | | | 46,298 | |
Other expense | | | 11,501 | | | | 15,458 | | | | 11,408 | |
General and administrative | | | 63,609 | | | | 61,359 | | | | 62,694 | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 18,190 | | | | 16,708 | | | | 31,790 | |
Management fee to parent | | | 6,563 | | | | 6,598 | | | | 6,946 | |
Impairment loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | 124,000 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| | | 229,536 | | | | 222,080 | | | | 372,840 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Operating loss | | | (15,525 | ) | | | (6,429 | ) | | | (145,998 | ) |
Interest income | | | — | | | | 12 | | | | 64 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net loss | | | (15,525 | ) | | | (6,417 | ) | | | (145,934 | ) |
Accumulated deficit, beginning of year | | | (198,511 | ) | | | (192,094 | ) | | | (46,160 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit, end of year | | $ | (214,036 | ) | | $ | (198,511 | ) | | $ | (192,094 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-4
LVH CORPORATION
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In Thousands)
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002 AND 2001
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2003
| | | 2002
| | | 2001
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss | | $ | (15,525 | ) | | $ | (6,417 | ) | | $ | (145,934 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | | 18,190 | | | | 16,708 | | | | 31,790 | |
Provision for bad debts | | | (1,678 | ) | | | (4,619 | ) | | | 3,484 | |
Impairment loss | | | — | | | | — | | | | 124,000 | |
Other | | | 235 | | | | 45 | | | | 1,226 | |
Change in working capital components: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | | (7,972 | ) | | | 11,135 | | | | 6,263 | |
Inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets | | | 173 | | | | (1,336 | ) | | | 4,469 | |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 9,697 | | | | (14,131 | ) | | | 5,679 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 3,120 | | | | 1,385 | | | | 30,977 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES-Additions to property and equipment | | | (11,434 | ) | | | (19,470 | ) | | | (10,914 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES-Change in due to affiliated companies | | | 5,798 | | | | 24,113 | | | | (31,472 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and equivalents | | | (2,516 | ) | | | 6,028 | | | | (11,409 | ) |
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year | | | 15,250 | | | | 9,222 | | | | 20,631 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at end of year | | $ | 12,734 | | | $ | 15,250 | | | $ | 9,222 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-5
LVH CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2002 AND 2001
1. | BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND OPERATIONS |
The accompanying financial statements present the accounts of LVH Corporation (the “Company”). The Company is a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Caesars Entertainment Inc. (“Caesars” or the “Parent”). The accompanying financial statements have been prepared from the separate records maintained by the Company and may not necessarily be indicative of the conditions that would have existed or the results of operations if the Company had been operated as an unaffiliated company.
The Company owns and operates the Las Vegas Hilton Hotel and Casino (the “Property”), a hotel and casino that is located on approximately 59 acres adjacent to the Las Vegas Convention Center. With this prominent convention location, the Property focuses its marketing toward convention groups. The Property features 2,968 guest rooms and suites, approximately 74,000 square feet of casino space, 12 restaurants and 225,000 square feet of meeting and convention area. The Property also includes a 1,600-seat showroom featuring top entertainers, a night club, and a spa and health club.
2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Cash and Equivalents—The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The carrying amount of cash and equivalents approximates its fair value.
Accounts Receivable—Accounts receivable from customers are stated net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,365,000 and $7,342,000 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Concentrations of Credit Risk—Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist principally of accounts receivable.
The Company extends credit to certain customers following an evaluation of the creditworthiness of the individual or entity. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce the accounts receivable to their estimated collectible amount. As of December 31, 2003, management believes that there are no concentrations of credit risk for which an allowance has not been established and recorded. The collectibility of foreign and domestic accounts receivable could be affected by future economic or other significant events in the United States or in the countries in which such foreign customers reside.
Inventories—Inventories consist primarily of food and beverage items and operating supplies and are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the weighted-average cost method.
Property and Equipment—Property and equipment are stated at cost. Costs of improvements are capitalized. Costs of normal repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Upon the sale or retirement of property and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts, and the resulting gain or loss, if any, is included in the statements of operations.
F-6
Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the asset life or lease term. The service lives of assets are generally 30 to 40 years for buildings and 3 to 10 years for furniture and equipment.
The carrying values of the Company’s assets are reviewed when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Asset impairment is determined to exist if estimated future cash flows, undiscounted and without interest charges, are less than the carrying amount. If it is determined that an impairment has occurred, then an impairment loss is recognized in the statement of operations (See Note 9).
Bank Overdrafts—Bank overdrafts are included on the balance sheets with accounts payable and totaled $2,960,000 and $2,975,000 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Self-Insurance—The Company is self-insured for various levels of general liability, workers’ compensation, and non-union employee medical and life insurance coverage. Self-insurance reserves are estimated based on the Company’s claims experience and are included in accrued expenses on the balance sheets.
Revenue Recognition—Casino revenue is derived primarily from patrons wagering on slot machines, table games and other gaming activities. Table games generally include Blackjack or Twenty One, Craps, Baccarat and Roulette. Other gaming activities include Keno and Race and Sports. Casino revenue is defined as the win from gaming activities, computed as the difference between gaming wins and losses, not the total amounts wagered. Casino revenue is recognized at the end of each gaming day.
Rooms revenue is derived from rooms and suites rented to guests. Rooms revenue is recognized at the time the room is provided to the guest.
Food and beverage revenues are derived from food and beverage sales in the food outlets of our casino hotel, including restaurants, room service and banquets. Food and beverage revenue is recognized at the time the food and/or beverage is provided to the guest.
Other revenue includes retail sales, entertainment sales, telephone, and other miscellaneous income at the casino hotel.
The revenue components presented in the statements of operations exclude the retail value of rooms, food and beverage, and other goods or services provided to customers on a complimentary basis. Complimentary revenues which have been excluded from the accompanying statements of operations are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | 2003
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
| | (in thousands) |
Rooms | | $ | 9,575 | | $ | 8,887 | | $ | 8,995 |
Food and beverage | | | 9,984 | | | 9,458 | | | 9,380 |
Other revenue | | | 1,205 | | | 1,115 | | | 1,042 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Total complimentary revenues | | $ | 20,764 | | $ | 19,460 | | $ | 19,417 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
F-7
The estimated departmental costs of providing these complimentaries are classified in the statements of operations as an expense of the department issuing the complimentary, primarily the casino department, and are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | |
| | 2003
| | 2002
| | 2001
|
| | (in thousands) |
Rooms | | $ | 3,534 | | $ | 3,235 | | $ | 3,173 |
Food and beverage | | | 9,269 | | | 9,039 | | | 8,528 |
Other expense | | | 1,235 | | | 1,112 | | | 871 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Total cost of promotional allowances | | $ | 14,038 | | $ | 13,386 | | $ | 12,572 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Income Taxes—The Company is included in the consolidated federal income tax return of Caesars. The Company computes its income tax expense based on its separate stand-alone operating results using the asset and liability method. Due to recurring losses, no current federal income tax expense is recognized and deferred tax assets related to such Net Operating Loss carryforwards have been recorded. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are recorded as deemed necessary based upon the uncertainty surrounding the realization of deferred tax assets.
Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements—In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 150,Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity.SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity and requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). The Company adopted SFAS No. 150, which did not have a material impact on its financial position and results of operations.
In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003) (“FIN 46R”), clarifying FIN 46 and exempting certain entities from the provisions of FIN 46R. Generally, application of FIN 46R is required in financial statements of public entities that have interests in structures commonly referred to as special-purpose entities for periods ending after December 15, 2003, and, for other types of variable interest entities for periods ending after March 15, 2004. FIN 46R addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities that either: (1) do not have sufficient equity investment at risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or (2) the company will hold a significant variable interest in, or have significant involvement with, an existing variable interest entity. During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company adopted the provisions of FIN 46R related to
F-8
special-purpose entities, which did not have a material impact on its financial position and results of operations. The Company will adopt the provisions of FIN 46R related to other types of variable interest entities during the first quarter of 2004.
In December 2003, the FASB issued an amendment to SFAS No. 132,Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits-an amendment of FASB Statements No.87, 88,and 106.SFAS No. 132 establishes standards for how a company discloses information about pension plans and other post-retirement benefit plans. During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company adopted the amended SFAS No. 132, which did not have a material impact on its financial position and results of operations.
Accounts receivable as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2003
| | | 2002
| |
| | (in thousands) | |
Casino | | $ | 19,427 | | | $ | 14,284 | |
Hotel and other | | | 5,702 | | | | 5,172 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| | | 25,129 | | | | 19,456 | |
Less allowance for doubtful accounts | | | (3,365 | ) | | | (7,342 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total | | $ | 21,764 | | | $ | 12,114 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The provision (benefit) for estimated uncollectible receivables, primarily included in casino expenses, was $(1,678,000), $(4,619,000) and $3,484,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Property and equipment as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2003
| | | 2002
| |
| | (in thousands) | |
Land | | $ | 18,685 | | | $ | 18,685 | |
Buildings and leasehold improvements | | | 306,724 | | | | 292,200 | |
Furniture and equipment | | | 124,343 | | | | 119,286 | |
Construction in progress | | | 926 | | | | 9,546 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| | | 450,678 | | | | 439,717 | |
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | | | (284,519 | ) | | | (266,802 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total | | $ | 166,159 | | | $ | 172,915 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
F-9
Accrued expenses as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
| | | | | | |
| | 2003
| | 2002
|
| | (in thousands) |
Compensation and benefits | | $ | 14,933 | | $ | 13,929 |
Customer deposits and future bets | | | 4,399 | | | 4,976 |
Outstanding casino chips and tokens | | | 1,856 | | | 3,916 |
Gaming and property taxes | | | 909 | | | 1,292 |
Outstanding sport, race and pari-mutuel tickets | | | 11,889 | | | 2,022 |
Other | | | 9,513 | | | 8,575 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
Total | | $ | 43,499 | | $ | 34,710 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
The Company is included in the consolidated federal income tax return of Caesars. Accordingly, the current federal tax liability or benefit resulting from the taxable income or loss generated by the Company is recognized by Caesars in its consolidated federal tax return.
The income tax benefit for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2003
| | | 2002
| | | 2001
| |
| | (in thousands) | |
Deferred federal benefit | | $ | (5,758 | ) | | $ | (2,367 | ) | | $ | (51,268 | ) |
Valuation allowance | | | 5,758 | | | | 2,367 | | | | 51,268 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the Company’s income tax benefit as compared to the benefit calculated by applying the federal statutory rate (35%) to the loss before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2003
| | | 2002
| | | 2001
| |
| | (in thousands) | |
Computed expected income tax benefit | | $ | (5,434 | ) | | $ | (2,246 | ) | | $ | (51,077 | ) |
General business credits differential | | | (340 | ) | | | (308 | ) | | | (347 | ) |
Other | | | 16 | | | | 187 | | | | 156 | |
Valuation allowance | | | 5,758 | | | | 2,367 | | | | 51,268 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The income tax effects of temporary differences between financial and income tax reporting that give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
F-10
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2003
| | | 2002
| |
| | (in thousands) | |
Deferred tax assets | | | | | | | | |
Accrued expenses | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,545 | |
Insurance and other reserves | | | 815 | | | | 1,144 | |
Benefit plans | | | 687 | | | | 387 | |
Fixed assets, primarily depreciation | | | 30,621 | | | | 35,865 | |
Net operating loss and credit carryforwards | | | 39,985 | | | | 26,741 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets | | | 72,108 | | | | 65,682 | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities | | | | | | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | (653 | ) | | | — | |
Other | | | (216 | ) | | | (201 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities | | | (869 | ) | | | (201 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance | | | 71,239 | | | | 65,481 | |
Valuation allowance | | | (71,239 | ) | | | (65,481 | ) |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Management has considered certain tax planning strategies as permitted by SFAS No. 109,Accounting for Income Taxes.Management has determined that tax benefits associated with deferred tax assets are more likely than not unrealizable through reduction of the Company’s future taxable income and future reversals of existing temporary differences and has recorded a full valuation allowance.
The Internal Revenue Service is currently examining the Parent’s federal income tax returns for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001. In the Company’s opinion, any tax liability arising from the examinations will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial statements.
7. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
Caesars
The Company has ongoing related party transactions with Caesars and certain other wholly owned subsidiaries of Caesars, most of which are transacted at amounts which approximate “cost” rather than market rates for similar transactions with companies outside the controlled group. A description of the primary related party transactions that have been accounted for in the books and records of the Company is as follows:
The Company leases gaming devices from a wholly owned subsidiary of Caesars. Lease expense for such gaming devices pursuant to these lease agreements totaled approximately $823,000, $572,000 and $288,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
F-11
Employees of the Company are eligible to participate in a 401(k) savings plan sponsored by Caesars (the “Plan”) after meeting certain age and length of employment requirements. Caesars remits all payroll deductions, employer matching and administrative expenses to the trustee of the Plan. These charges totaled approximately $4,002,000, $3,937,000 and $3,765,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Certain executive level employees of the Company are eligible to participate in a deferred compensation plan sponsored by Caesars. Caesars remits all payroll deductions, employer matching and administrative expenses to the trustee of the deferred compensation plan. These charges totaled approximately $705,000, $1,025,000 and $849,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Medical benefits for employees of the Company as well as certain other employee related benefits such as a wellness center, employee assistance program and health fairs are provided and funded by Caesars. Charges for these items totaled approximately $6,595,000, $5,170,000 and $5,244,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The Company is included with Caesars and its other domestic subsidiaries for general liability, worker’s compensation, theft, errors and omissions and other insurance purposes. Costs for the self-insured general liability and worker’s compensation programs are allocated to Caesars’ subsidiaries based upon actual claim data and costs for the other coverage are allocated to Caesars’ subsidiaries based on relative premium by subsidiary. Insurance costs allocated to the Company totaled approximately $2,350,000, $2,803,000 and $2,182,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Caesars and other wholly owned subsidiaries of Caesars provide marketing and advertising services for the Company. Included in these costs are the costs of advertising for the Company in various media outlets and direct marketing efforts to certain patrons. Marketing and advertising costs allocated to the Company totaled approximately $1,220,000, $885,000 and $930,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Caesars and other wholly owned subsidiaries of Caesars provide various support services for the Company. Included in these services are accounts payable, call center, collections, human resources, payroll, public relations, purchasing and race and sports book administration. Support services costs allocated to the Company totaled approximately $2,084,000, $1,430,000 and $669,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Wholly owned subsidiaries of Caesars provide various services for the Company. Included in these services are food preparation, laundry, dry cleaning and other professional services. Service costs allocated to the Company totaled approximately $6,057,000, $5,277,000 and $2,840,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The Company utilizes the facilities of other wholly owned subsidiaries of Caesars as a marketing mechanism for certain patrons, including Cascata, the Caesars owned golf course. Costs allocated to the Company totaled approximately $274,000, $323,000 and $364,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The Company and other wholly owned subsidiaries of Caesars buy and sell tickets to various events to be distributed to certain patrons as well as host events attended by patrons of other Caesars’ hotels
F-12
and casinos. The net amount of such purchases and sales was an expense of approximately $474,000, $107,000 and $241,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Certain significant construction projects are managed through Caesars. Caesars purchases the materials and manages the construction process, charging the Company the total cost of both the materials and labor. The total amount of such costs was approximately $4,278,000, $14,981,000 and $7,511,000 for the years ended December 31,2003,2002 and 2001, respectively.
Until 2001, the Company provided printing services and postage for Caesars and other wholly owned subsidiaries of Caesars. During 2001, such printing services and postage were outsourced to a third party vendor. In conjunction therewith, Caesars began funding postage costs to the third party vendor as well and charging such postage costs to the Company. In 2001, the Company received approximately $3,341,000 for such printing services and postage costs. Postage costs allocated to the Company totaled approximately $470,000, $641,000 and $4,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The Company and other wholly owned subsidiaries of Caesars share race and sports book revenues and the gaming taxes associated with such revenues based upon race and sports book handle. In conjunction with this revenue sharing, the Company recorded a net benefit of approximately $2,433,000 and $1,143,000 and a net expense of approximately $2,578,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Caesars and other wholly owned subsidiaries of Caesars provide various support services and products for sale in the Company’s retail outlets. The costs for such products and support services allocated to the Company totaled approximately $2,253,000, $1,855,000 and $1,848,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The Company receives a credit from Caesars for commissions on ATM and cash advance transactions as well as rebates associated with Company purchases. The credits allocated to the Company totaled approximately $1,333,000, $681,000 and $634,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Caesars receives a management fee for services provided to the Company by the Parent that is based upon certain operating results. The services provided to the Company by the Parent include centralized information technology, internal audit, risk management, legal and other administrative functions. The fee charged totaled approximately $6,563,000, $6,598,000 and $6,946,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The net amounts due to Caesars and certain other wholly owned subsidiaries of Caesars as a result of related party transactions totaled $39,993,000 and $34,195,000 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Such amounts are non-interest bearing.
Hilton
On December 31, 1998, Hilton Hotels Corporation (“Hilton”) completed the transfer of the operations, assets and liabilities of its gaming business to the Parent. Hilton and Caesars have several members of their Boards of Directors in common. The Company has ongoing related party transactions with Hilton and certain other wholly owned subsidiaries of Hilton. A description of the
F-13
primary related party transactions that have been accounted for in the books and records of the Company is as follows:
The Company pays a franchise fee for the rights to use the Hilton trade name. Franchise fees paid to Hilton pursuant to the franchise fee agreement totaled approximately $2,500,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.
The Company pays a fee for the right to be included in the Hilton group and convention marketing literature and program. Group and convention marketing fees paid to Hilton totaled approximately $710,000, $668,000 and $735,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The Company pays a fee for the usage of a centralized reservations system. Reservations fees paid to Hilton totaled approximately $322,000, $375,000 and $485,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
The Company pays a fee for the HHonors customer loyalty program. HHonors fees paid to Hilton totaled approximately $522,000, $460,000 and $443,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Company receives a fee from Hilton when a patron utilizes their HHonors points at the Property. HHonors fees received from Hilton totaled approximately $1,017,000, $437,000 and $149,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
8. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Litigation
The Company is involved in various legal proceedings relating to its business. The Company believes that all the actions brought against it are without merit and will continue to vigorously defend against them. While any proceeding or litigation has an element of uncertainty, the Company believes that the final outcome of these matters is not likely to have a material adverse effect upon its results of operations or financial position.
Contracts
Pursuant to agreements between the Company and Paramount Parks, Inc. (“Paramount”), under which Paramount operates a themed simulation ride attraction at the Property called Star Trek: The Experience (the “Attraction”), the Company recorded net expense of approximately $1,375,000, $1,188,000 and $943,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. In addition, the Company paid approximately $1,112,000, $1,235,000 and $1,150,000 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, toward advertising making reference to the Attraction. Effective January 1, 2004, the agreements were amended to eliminate the annual payments to Paramount, eliminate the annual Star Trek advertising, except for approximately $250,000 to be paid in 2004, and required the Company to provide $2,000,000 to be used for improvements to the Attraction, which the Company paid to Paramount in December 2003.
F-14
Other
The Company is obligated under other contracts for various items such as advertising, equipment maintenance and employment.
The following is a schedule of future minimum commitments under noncancellable contacts as of December 31, 2003 (in thousands):
| | | |
2004 | | $ | 3,692 |
2005 | | | 1,348 |
2006 | | | 292 |
2007 | | | 38 |
| |
|
|
Total | | $ | 5,370 |
| |
|
|
In July 2000, a definitive agreement was signed that would have resulted in the sale of the property, building and equipment of the Company for a base price of $300,000,000. The agreement provided that Caesars would retain receivables relating to high-end casino play, and would attempt to service high-end customers at other properties. As anticipated by the agreement, and once it was announced, high-end gaming customers gradually ceased play at the Property.
During the third and fourth quarters of 2000, revenues began to reflect the loss of the high-end play without incremental lower and mid-level gamblers’ play or increased convention business. Operating income was also negatively impacted as costs associated with the high-end play could not be reduced as quickly because the Property continued to provide service to the remaining high-end market pending closing of the sale. Additionally, the held-for-sale status affected the Property’s ability to compete for other casino business.
In January 2001, the purchaser failed to further extend the closing date and did not complete the transaction, thereby breaching the terms of the agreement. Caesars ceased its efforts to sell the Property and continued to operate it in the normal course, but with a focus on lower and mid-level gamblers’ play and convention business. However, the facilities were originally designed to cater to and accommodate high-end play.
During 2001, revenues declined from $73,000,000 in the first quarter to $48,000,000 in the third quarter. Operating income during 2001 was $7,000,000 in the first quarter, a loss of $3,000,000 in the second quarter, and a loss of $14,000,000 in the third quarter. The successive quarters of operating losses coupled with the significant reduction in convention and group visitation into Las Vegas resulting from the events of September 11 necessitated a review of the Company’s assets for impairment.
Based on an analysis of expected future cash flows, an impairment existed. LVH engaged an independent appraisal company to assist in the valuation of the Hotel. The fair value was determined using a combination of future cash flow analysis and market/sales comparison analysis of the Property resulting in a fair value that was $124,000,000 less than the carrying value of the assets. A $124,000,000 write-down of fixed assets was made in the third quarter of 2001.
F-15
10. | PROPOSED SALE OF THE LAS VEGAS HILTON |
On December 24, 2003, Caesars entered into a definitive agreement to sell the Property to an affiliate of Colony Capital, LLC (“Colony”), a Los Angeles based international private investment firm, for approximately $280,000,000. The transaction is expected to close by the end of the second quarter of 2004 and is subject to customary closing conditions outlined in the purchase agreement.
Under the terms of the agreement, Colony will purchase most the assets of the Company, and will assume certain related current liabilities. The aggregate consideration may be adjusted for changes in net working capital. In addition, certain gaming devices currently leased from a wholly owned subsidiary of Caesars (as discussed in Note 7) will be included in the assets sold to Colony.
Until the sale is completed, the Property will be accounted for as an asset held for sale and property and equipment will no longer be depreciated.
******
F-16
Report of Independent Public Accountants
To Colony Resorts LVH Holdings, LLC:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC (a Nevada limited liability company in the development stage) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2003 and the related statements of operations, member’s deficit and cash flows for the period from December 18, 2003 (date of inception) to December 31, 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC at December 31, 2003 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period from December 18, 2003 (date of inception) to December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Las Vegas, Nevada
March 12, 2004
F-17
COLONY RESORTS LVH ACQUISITIONS, LLC
(A Development Stage Company)
BALANCE SHEET
DECEMBER 31, 2003
(in thousands)
| | | | |
ASSETS | | | | |
| |
OTHER ASSETS – NON-CURRENT: | | | | |
Restricted cash – long term | | $ | 15,000 | |
Deferred financing costs | | | 1,950 | |
| |
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 16,950 | |
| |
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S DEFICIT | | | | |
| |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | |
Due to affiliates | | $ | 17,362 | |
| |
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | | 17,362 | |
| |
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | | | — | |
MEMBER’S DEFICIT | | | (412 | ) |
| |
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND MEMBER’S DEFICIT | | $ | 16,950 | |
| |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-18
COLONY RESORTS LVH ACQUISITIONS, LLC
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE PERIOD FROM DECEMBER 18, 2003 (DATE OF INCEPTION) THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2003
(In thousands)
| | | |
EXPENSES: | | | |
Advertising and marketing | | $ | 2 |
Licensing fees | | | 230 |
Professional fees | | | 26 |
Travel and entertainment | | | 154 |
| |
|
|
NET LOSS ACCUMULATED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE | | $ | 412 |
| |
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-19
COLONY RESORTS LVH ACQUISITIONS, LLC
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF MEMBER’S DEFICIT
FOR THE PERIOD FROM DECEMBER 18, 2003 (DATE OF INCEPTION)
THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2003
(In thousands)
| | | | |
| | Member’s Deficit
| |
| | | | |
BALANCE, December 18, 2003 | | $ | — | |
| |
Net loss accumulated during the development stage | | | (412 | ) |
Members’ contributions | | | — | |
| |
|
|
|
| |
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2003 | | $ | (412 | ) |
| |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-20
COLONY RESORTS LVH ACQUISITIONS, LLC
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE PERIOD FROM DECEMBER 18, 2003 (DATE OF INCEPTION)
THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2003
(In thousands)
| | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | |
Net loss accumulated during the development stage | | $ | (412 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss accumulated during the development stage to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | |
Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | | |
Due to affiliates | | | 17,362 | |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 16,950 | |
| |
|
|
|
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | |
Changes in restricted cash | | | (15,000 | ) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Net cash used in investing activities | | | (15,000 | ) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | |
Debt issuance costs | | | (1,950 | ) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (1,950 | ) |
| |
|
|
|
| |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH | | | — | |
| |
CASH, DECEMBER 18, 2003 (DATE OF INCEPTION ) | | | — | |
| |
|
|
|
| |
CASH, DECEMBER 31, 2003 | | $ | — | |
| |
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-21
COLONY RESORTS LVH ACQUISITIONS, LLC
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
Nature of operations
Colony Resorts LVH Acquisitions, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (the “Company”), was formed at the direction of Colony Investors VI, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Colony VI”) and an affiliate of Colony Capital, Inc. (“Colony Capital”), under the laws of the State of Nevada on December 18, 2003. All of the Company’s outstanding Class A Membership Units (see Note 3) are currently held by Colony Resorts LVH Holdings, LLC. Pursuant to its Operating Agreement dated December 22, 2003, the Company will continue in existence perpetually. Members of the Company, however, may terminate the Operating Agreement and dissolve the Company at any time.
The Company has conducted no business other than in connection with the execution of a Purchase and Sale Agreement (as defined below), relating to the pending acquisition of substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of LVH Corporation, a Nevada corporation (“LVH”). LVH is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Caesars Entertainment Inc., formerly Park Place Entertainment Corporation (“Park Place”) and owns and operates the Las Vegas Hilton, a casino hotel located in Las Vegas, Nevada (the “Hotel”).
The Company, LVH and Park Place, have entered into the Purchase and Sale Agreement which is dated as of December 24, 2003 (the “Purchase and Sale Agreement”). Pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions to the obligations of the parties under the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the Company will acquire substantially all of the assets and certain liabilities of LVH (the “Acquisition”) for approximately $280,000,000 subject to certain adjustments defined in the Purchase and Sale Agreement. Subsequent to the Acquisition, the Company will continue certain of the current business operations of LVH but will not have an ongoing relationship with LVH or Park Place.
The Company currently intends to finance the Acquisition and pay related fees and expenses with (1) capital contributions from the issuance of Class A and Class B Membership Units (the “Equity Financing”), (2) a non-recourse first mortgage term loan in the amount of approximately $200 million from Goldman Sachs & Co. (the “Goldman Term Loan”); and (3) a term loan in the amount of approximately $25 million from Hilton Hotels Corporation, an related party of Park Place, (the “Hilton Term Loan” and together with the Equity Financing and the Goldman Term Loan, the “Acquisition Financing”). If the Acquisition is consummated, the actual types and amounts of funds utilized to finance the Acquisition and pay related fees and expenses may differ based on prevailing circumstances at the time. In addition, application of the Acquisition Financing is subject to, among other matters, applicable gaming authority approvals. The Acquisition Financing and capital structure are subject to change based on events and circumstances that may occur on or prior to the closing of the Acquisition.
F-22
Development Stage Risk Factors
As a development stage company, the Company has risks that may impact its ability to successfully complete the Acquisition, which includes as described above, obtaining financing for the Acquisition. In addition, prior to the completion of the Acquisition, the Company must secure several state and local government regulatory agency approvals, including, but not limited to, securing a state gaming license for the ownership and operation of the Hotel.
2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Restricted Cash
The Company has deposited $15 million into an escrow account at December 31, 2003 which will be applied towards the Acquisition purchase price.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs consist of a commitment fee and deposits totaling of $1,950,000 related to the Company’s proposed financing. The Company will commence amortization of these costs once the related debt is secured.
Income Taxes
The Company is a limited liability company and will be taxed as a partnership for federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, no provision for federal income taxes was recorded because the taxable income or loss is included in the income tax return of the member.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.
In connection with and immediately prior to the Acquisition, the Company expects to issue Class A Membership Units (“Class A Units”) to Colony Resorts LVH Coinvestment VoteCo, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Coinvestment VoteCo”) and Colony Resorts LVH VoteCo, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“VoteCo”) on a pro rata basis in proportion to the equity contributions made by each entity. In addition, the Company expects to issue Class B Membership Units (“Class B Units” and together with the Class A Units, the “Membership Units”) to Colony Resorts LVH Co-Investment Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Co-Investment Partners”) and to Colony Resorts LVH Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and
F-23
wholly-owned subsidiary of Colony VI (“Holdings”) on a pro rata basis in proportion to the equity contributions made by each entity. All of these entities are existing affiliates of the Company.
Prior to the closing of the Acquisition, the Company expects to execute an Amended and Restated Operating Agreement by and among the Company, VoteCo, Coinvestment VoteCo, Holdings and Co-Investment Partners. Pursuant to the Operating Agreement, holders of Class A Units will be entitled to one vote per unit in all matters to be voted on by voting members of the Company. Holders of Class B Units will have no vote, except as otherwise expressly required by law.
The Company will issue Class A Units and Class B Units in connection with the organizational structure to be put in place in order to consummate the Acquisition so that Holdings and Co-Investment Partners may acquire substantially all of the assets of LVH without having any voting power or other power to control the affairs or operations of the Company, except as otherwise expressly required by law.
At the time of the closing of the Acquisition, the Company expects that various transfer restriction agreements will be executed.
The Company’s Class A Units to be issued to Coinvestment VoteCo will be subject to the Coinvestment Transfer Restriction Agreement, which the Company expects will provide, among other things, that:
| • | Co-Investment Partners has the right to acquire Class A Units from Coinvestment VoteCo on each occasion that Class B Units held by Co-Investment Partners would be transferred to a proposed purchaser who, in connection with such proposed sale, has obtained all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, consents, waivers, orders, findings of suitability or other approvals required to be obtained from, and has made all findings, notices or declarations required to be made with, all gaming authorities under all applicable gaming laws, |
| • | A specific purchase price, as determined in accordance with the Coinvestment Transfer Restriction Agreement, will be paid to acquire the Class A Units from Coinvestment VoteCo, and |
| • | Coinvestment VoteCo will not transfer ownership of Class A Units owned by it except pursuant to such option of Co-Investment Partners. |
The Company’s Class A Units to be issued to VoteCo will be subject to the VoteCo Transfer Restriction Agreement, which the Company expects will provide, among other things, that:
| • | Holdings has the right to acquire Class A Units from VoteCo on each occasion that Class B Units held by Holdings would be transferred to a proposed purchaser who, in connection with such proposed sale, has obtained all licenses, permits, registrations, authorizations, consents, waivers, orders, findings of suitability or other approvals required to be obtained from, and has made all findings, notices or declarations required to be made with, all gaming authorities under all applicable gaming laws, |
F-24
| • | A specific purchase price, as determined in accordance with the VoteCo Transfer Restriction Agreement, will be paid to acquire the Class A Units from VoteCo, and |
| • | VoteCo will not transfer ownership of Class A Units owned by it except pursuant to such option of Holdings. |
VoteCo, Coinvestment VoteCo, Holdings and Co-Investment Partners intend to enter into a Holders Agreement prior to or concurrently with the closing of the Acquisition with respect to the Membership Units held by each. The terms of the Holders Agreement are currently under negotiation. It is currently anticipated that any future holders of the Company’s Membership Units will become a party to the Holders Agreement.
4. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
Colony Investors VI, L.P. funded the escrow deposit and deferred financing costs and paid certain expenses related to the Company’s operations during the period from December 18, 2003 (date of inception) through December 31, 2003. These advances are reported as Due from Affiliates in the accompanying balance sheet.
5. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Employment Arrangements
The Company has entered into employment agreements, as amended, with several executives. The employment agreements have initial terms of three to five years and are subject to one-year extensions. The employment agreements provide the executives will receive a base salary with either mandatory increases or annual adjustments and annual bonus payments.
In addition, the employment agreements provide that the Company will grant these executives options to purchase the Company’s Class A Units and Class B Units that are issued and outstanding as of the date on which the Acquisition is completed. The Options will be granted under the equity compensation plan to be adopted by the Company. Depending on the terms of the employment agreement, executives will be granted options to purchase 0.5% to 1.5% of the Membership Units.
Easement
The Hilton Grand Vacations property, located adjacent to the Hotel, has an easement for use of approximately 260 parking spaces (out of approximately 3,100 parking spaces). There is also an easement for the use of the monorail that runs through the Hotel property.
Environmental
An independent environmental consultant performed a Phase I environmental site assessment in accordance with ASTM standards on the Las Vegas Hilton property in December 2003. This assessment involved visual inspection, interviews with site personnel, review of certain publicly available records, and preparation of a written report. The assessment did not include any testing of soil or groundwater at the property. According to certain historical data integrated into the Phase I report, in 2000 it was discovered that there is a plume of tetrachloroethene in the groundwater and the property was listed as a leaking underground storage tank site. The contamination is believed to originate from an off-site source, but the source has not yet been identified. To date, the Nevada
F-25
Division of Environmental Protection has not required any additional investigation at the property. The Phase I report states that levels of tetrachloroethene and total petroleum hydrocarbons in the groundwater beneath the property in 2000 exceeded certain limits allowed under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. The Phase I report indicates that the allowable levels have been exceeded in the past and a treatment system is needed to ensure compliance with applicable requirements. The Company expects to install a treatment system at a nominal cost. The Phase I report also identified asbestos-containing materials at the Hotel. The Company expects to manage these materials pursuant to an operations and maintenance program.
The Company has not determined what the cost, if any, will be with respect to the groundwater or the asbestos issue, however, the Company believes that the issues will not have a material effect upon its financial position or results of operations subsequent to the Acquisition. There can be no assurance, however, that the estimated capital and operating costs for the treatment system will not be exceeded or that there will be no claims or other liabilities associated with the foregoing conditions.
Litigation
The Company is not a party to any litigation and, no action, suit or proceedings against it has been threatened by any person.
F-26