COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | 3 Months Ended |
Mar. 31, 2015 |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | 5.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
Operating Lease Commitment (in thousands) |
|
On November 29, 2011 and as amended on September 17, 2012, the Company entered into a commercial lease for 26,150 square feet of office, laboratory and manufacturing space in Cambridge, Massachusetts (as subsequently amended, the “Cambridge Lease”). The term of the Cambridge Lease is for six years and three months, with one five-year extension option. The Cambridge Lease also requires a standby letter of credit in the amount of $311 (see Note 3). |
|
The Cambridge Lease contains certain rent escalation clauses. The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the Cambridge Lease and records the difference between the amount charged to expense and the rent paid as a deferred rent liability. As of March 31, 2015, the amount of deferred rent liability is $459 and is included in accrued expenses. |
|
Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s non-cancelable lease agreements in effect at March 31, 2015, the future minimum rent commitments are as follows (in thousands): |
|
Year Ended December 31, | | | |
2015 | | 928 | |
2016 | | 1,263 | |
2017 | | 1,289 | |
2018 | | 1,092 | |
Total | | $ | 4,572 | |
|
Total rent expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, including month-to-month leases, was $262 and $287, respectively. |
|
On September 4, 2013, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the landlord of the Cambridge Lease, which resulted in the receipt of approximately $286 in prepaid rent as consideration for the settlement of litigation. The settlement has been included in deferred rent payable, and the benefit will be amortized through rent expense over the term of the Cambridge Lease. |
|
Litigation |
|
Lawsuit with Former Employee |
|
In November 2013, the Company filed a lawsuit against Francis Reynolds, its former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in Middlesex Superior Court, Middlesex County, Massachusetts (InVivo Therapeutics Holdings Corp. v. Reynolds, Civil Action No. 13-5004). The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duties, breach of contract, conversion, misappropriation of corporate assets, unjust enrichment, corporate waste, and seeks monetary damages and an accounting. The lawsuit involves approximately $500,000 worth of personal and/or exorbitant expenses that the Company alleges Mr. Reynolds inappropriately caused it to pay while he was serving as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors. On December 6, 2013, Mr. Reynolds answered the complaint, and filed counterclaims against the Company and the Board of Directors. The counterclaims allege two counts of breach of contract, two counts of breach of the covenant of good faith and fair-dealing, and tortious interference with a contract, and seek monetary damages and a declaratory judgment. The counterclaims involve Mr. Reynolds’s allegations that the Company and the Board interfered with the performance of his duties under the terms of his employment agreement, and that Mr. Reynolds was entitled to additional shares upon the exercise of certain stock options. On January 9, 2014, the Company, along with the directors named in the counterclaims, filed its answer. The parties are currently conducting pre-trial discovery. No judgments or rulings are pending at this stage. |
|
Shareholder Matters and Investigations |
|
On July 31, 2014, a putative securities class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, naming the Company and Mr. Reynolds, as defendants (the “Securities Class Action”). The lawsuit alleges violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with allegedly false and misleading statements related to the timing and completion of the clinical study of the Company’s Neuro-Spinal Scaffold. The plaintiff seeks class certification for purchasers of the Company’s common stock during the period from April 5, 2013 through August 26, 2013 and unspecified damages. On April 3, 2015, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissed the plaintiff’s claim with prejudice. Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal of this decision on May 4, 2015. |
|
On January 23, 2015, Shawn Luger, a purported shareholder of the Company, sent the Company a letter demanding that the Board take action to remedy purported breaches of fiduciary duties allegedly related to the claimed false and misleading statements that were the subject of the Securities Class Action (the “Shareholder Demand”). The Board is currently considering this demand. |
|
In addition to the Shareholder Demand, the Company has received investigation subpoenas from the Boston Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Massachusetts Securities Division of the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts requesting corporate documents also concerning, among other topics, the allegations raised Securities Class Action and the Shareholder Demand. The Company is cooperating with these investigations. |
|
|