- 9 -
PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOVEMBER 30, 2010
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Portlogic Systems Inc. (“Portlogic”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on June 22, 2004. On June 5, 2008, Portlogic filed a Form S-1 Registration Statement under the United States Securities Act of 1933. It became effective June 24, 2008.
Portlogic is a Toronto, Canada based development stage company that creates and licenses online interactive community portal software systems. Portlogic has developed and is in the process of developing a series of web-based community portal products.
On September 16, 2009, Portlogic incorporated a wholly-owned subsidiary, Sunlogic Energy Corporation in Panama City, Republic of Panama for the purpose of looking at solar and alternative green energy software and products. Initial operations include: capital formation; organization; website construction; target market identification; research costs; promotional materials costs; and marketing planning. Sunlogic Energy Corporation is still incorporated as a subsidiary but its operations are on hold.
Since January 2010, Portlogic has expanded the scope of technology offerings to include marketing mobile applications solutions and kiosk hardware and software products. Portlogic’s product offering now include enterprise software solutions which fall into five principal product families: m2Meet, m2Bank, m2Market, m2Ticket, and m2Kiosk.
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include Portlogic and its subsidiary (herein after referred to collectively as the “Company”). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission requirements for interim financial statements. Therefore, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2010.
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements present the balance sheet, statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficiency) and cash flows of the Company. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with GAAP.
NOTE 2. GOING CONCERN
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements are presented on a going concern basis which contemplates the realization of assets and discharge of obligations in the normal course of business as they come due. No adjustments have been made to assets or liabilities in these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should the Company not be able to continue normal business operations.
The Company has incurred losses from inception and, during the six month period ended November 30, 2010, the Company utilized $71,136 (November 30, 2009 - $123,913) of cash in operations. At November 30, 2010, the Company reported a deficit of $730,470 and continues to expend cash in amounts that exceed revenues. These conditions cast substantial doubt on the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern and meet its obligations as they come due. Management is considering various alternatives and is pursuing raising additional capital resources. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that these initiatives if undertaken will be successful.
The Company is in the development stage and is in the process of developing a series of web-based community portal products as well as a series of off-the-shelf template based websites. Sale of one of these products commenced during the 2008 fiscal year. Since January 2010, the Company has expanded the scope of technology offerings to include marketing mobile applications solutions and kiosk hardware and software products. The Company’s continuance as a going concern is dependent on the commercialization of more of the Company’s
- 10 -
PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOVEMBER 30, 2010
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
NOTE 2. GOING CONCERN (cont’d)
products and the achievement of profitable operations as well as the success of the Company in raising additional long-term financing through debt or equity offerings. In the event that the Company is not successful in these efforts, the assets may not be realized or liabilities discharged at their carrying amounts, and differences from the carrying amounts reported in these consolidated financial statements could be material.
NOTE 3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The interim consolidated financial information is unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position as of November 30, 2010 and the results of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficiency) and cash flows presented herein have been included in the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for the full year.
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the period. Financial statement items subject to significant judgment include the expected life of equipment and source code, the net realizable value of loan receivable, the completeness of expense accruals, as well as income taxes and loss contingencies. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents comprise highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. As at November 30, 2010, cash equivalents amounted to $7,575 (May 31, 2010 - $8,007).
Equipment
Equipment is recorded at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives (three years for computer hardware and two years for computer software).
Asset Impairment
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows that are expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition.
Source Code
The Company has capitalized the costs of acquiring computer source code in accordance with the provisions of the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) in ASC 985-20, “Costs of Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Marketed." At each reporting period end, the Company analyzes the realizability of its recorded software assets under the provisions of that statement. An impairment loss would be recognized when and to the extent that the carrying amount of the software exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows that are expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Since the source code has started to generate positive cash flows and is still being used for development, no impairment loss has been recognized. Amortization is provided using the straight-line method over the asset's estimated useful life, three years.
- 11 -
PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOVEMBER 30, 2010
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
NOTE 3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs amounted to $3,836 for the six month period ended November 30, 2010 (November 30, 2009 - $5,447), which was included as part of selling and administrative expenses.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue at the point of passage to the customer of title and risk of loss when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the sales price is determinable, and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.Service revenues are generally recognized at the time of performance. Revenues billed in advance under contracts are deferred and recognized over the corresponding service periods.
Foreign Currency Translation
The Company maintains its accounting records in US dollars, which is its functional and reporting currency. At the transaction date, each asset, liability, revenue and expense denominated in a foreign currency is translated into the functional currency by the use of the exchange rate in effect at that date. At the period end, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency by using the exchange rate in effect at that date. The resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are included in operations. Foreign exchange loss amounted to $1,879 for the six month period ended November 30, 2010 (November 30, 2009 – $2,965).
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for its income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, “Income Taxes”, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in operations in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Earnings (Loss) per Share
The Company reports earnings (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, "Earnings per Share." Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares available. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed similar to basic earnings (loss) per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Diluted earnings (loss) per share has not been presented since the effect of the assumed conversion of the convertible loan into common shares would have an anti-dilutive effect.
Comprehensive Income
The Company has adopted ASC 220, "Comprehensive Income," which establishes standards for reporting and the display of comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances. Comprehensive income is defined to include all changes in equity except those resulting from investments by owners or distributions to owners. Among other disclosures, the standard requires that all items that are required to be recognized under the current accounting standards as a component of comprehensive income be reported in a financial statement that is displayed with the
- 12 -
PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOVEMBER 30, 2010
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
NOTE 3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)
same prominence as other financial statements. Comprehensive income would be displayed in the statement of shareholders' equity and in the balance sheet as a component of shareholders' equity (deficiency). The Company had no other comprehensive income (loss) for the six month periods ended November 30, 2010 and 2009. As such, net loss is equivalent to total comprehensive loss.
Financial Instruments and Risk Concentrations
The Company’s financial instruments comprise cash and cash equivalents, loan receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, notes payable and convertible loan. Unless otherwise indicated, the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities approximate their recorded values due to their short terms to maturity. The Company determines the fair value of its long-term financial instruments based on quoted market values or discounted cash flow analyses.
Financial instruments that may potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk comprise primarily cash and cash equivalents and a loan receivable. Cash and cash equivalents comprise deposits with major commercial banks and/or checking account balances. With respect to loans receivable, the Company performs periodic credit evaluations of the financial condition of its customers and typically does not require collateral from them. Allowances are maintained for potential credit losses consistent with the credit risk of specific customers and other information. Unless otherwise noted, it is management's opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest or currency risks in respect of its financial instruments.
Leases
Leases entered into by the Company as a lessee are classified as capital or operating leases. Leases that transfer substantially the entire risks and benefits incidental to ownership are classified as capital leases. At the inception of a capital lease, an asset and an obligation are recorded at an amount equal to the lesser of the present value of the minimum lease payments and the asset’s fair market value at the beginning of each lease. Rental payments under operating leases are expensed as incurred.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2010, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU” or “Update”) No. 2010–17, “Revenue Recognition - Milestone Method.” The objective of this Update is to provide guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. The amendments in this Update are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this pronouncement will have a significant effect on its unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
In February 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, “Subsequent Events” (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2010-09”). ASU 2010-09 amends disclosure requirements within Subtopic 855-10. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and the SEC’s requirements. ASU 2010-09 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (“ASU 2010-06”) (codified within ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures). ASU 2010-06 improves disclosures originally required under SFAS No. 157. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in
- 13 -
PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOVEMBER 30, 2010
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
NOTE 3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (cont’d)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (cont’d)
the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those years. The adoption of the guidance did not have a material effect on the Company's unaudited interim consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows or related disclosures.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, “Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements,” a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (“ASU 2009-13”) (codified within ASC Topic 605). ASU 2009-13 addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of ASU 2009-13 on its unaudited interim consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Beginning June 1, 2008, the Company partially applied accounting standard, “Fair Value Measurements,” codified as ASC 820. The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The standard defines fair value as the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability. The fair value, in this context, should be calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In addition, the fair value of liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk including our own credit risk.
In addition to defining fair value, the standard expands the disclosure requirements around fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. Each fair value measurement is reported in one of the three levels which are determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. These levels are:
| | |
● | Level 1 | Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; |
● | Level 2 | Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable; |
● | Level 3 | Assets or liabilities for which fair value is based on valuation models with significant unobservable pricing inputs and which result in the use of management estimates. |
Fair Value Measurements Using | | Assets/Liabilities |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | | Level3 | | | At Fair Value |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents | | | $3,124 | | | $ | 7,575 | | | | - | | | $ | 10,699 |
Loan receivable |
|
|
|
|
| $ | 15,10s0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| $ | 15,100 |
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
| - |
|
| $ | 305,000 |
|
|
| - |
|
| $ | 305,000 |
Convertible loan |
|
| - |
|
| $ | 7,000 |
|
|
| - |
|
| $ | 7,000 |
- 14 -
PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOVEMBER 30, 2010
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
NOTE 5. EQUIPMENT
| | | |
Equipment – November 30, 2010 | Cost | Accumulated Depreciation | Net Book Value |
| $ | $ | $ |
Computer hardware | 9,266 | 7,346 | 1,920 |
Computer software | 5,456 | 4,321 | 1.135 |
| 14,722 | 11,667 | 3,055 |
| | | |
Equipment – May 31, 2010 | Cost | Accumulated Depreciation | Net Book Value |
| $ | $ | $ |
Computer hardware | 7,783 | 6,651 | 1,132 |
Computer software | 5,456 | 3,797 | 1,659 |
| 13,239 | 10,448 | 2,791 |
Depreciation expense amounted to $1,218 for the six month period ended November 30, 2010 (November 30, 2009 - $999).
NOTE 6. SOURCE CODE
| | | |
Source Code – November 30, 2010 | Cost | Accumulated Amortization | Net Book Value |
| $ | $ | $ |
Internet dating portal software | 152,000 | 139,333 | 12,667 |
| | | |
Source Code – May 31, 2010 | Cost | Accumulated Amortization | Net Book Value |
| $ | $ | $ |
Internet dating portal software | 152,000 | 114,000 | 38,000 |
On October 31, 2005, the Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with Joyn Internet Communities Inc. ("Joyn") to acquire Internet dating software that Joyn had developed, including all rights to use and license the software.
In consideration, the Company issued 4,480,000 restricted common shares and paid $40,000, cash. The stock-based portion of the issuance, according to the terms of the agreement, was valued at $112,000, or $0.025 per share.
The Company did not capitalize any additional source code software for the six month period ended November 30, 2010, or for period from June 22, 2004 (inception) to November 30, 2010.
Amortization expense, included in cost of goods sold, amounted to $25,333 for the six month period ended November 30, 2010 (November 30, 2009 - $25,333). Amortization commenced March 1, 2008, when it became apparent that the source code was being used to generate revenue.
- 15 -
PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOVEMBER 30, 2010
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
NOTE 7. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
| | | |
| November 30 2010 | May 31, 2010 |
| $ | $ |
Audit and review | 19,471 | 22,767 |
Legal | 5,975 | 177 |
Credit cards | 5,732 | 4,402 |
Interest payable | 15,889 | 8,862 |
Other | 28,663 | 24,806 |
|
| 75,730 | 61,014 |
NOTE 8. NOTES PAYABLE
On July 18, 2008, the Company issued a note payable in consideration of a draw down unsecured loan up to an aggregate of $100,000 over a term of one year. Interest is payable at the prime rate plus 2%. Principal and interest were due on July 18, 2009 unless demanded earlier. On July 18, 2008, the Company borrowed $25,000 against the total $100,000 available to be drawn down. On April 14, 2009, the Company borrowed $5,000 against the total $75,000 available to be drawn down. On June 10, 2009, the Company borrowed $50,000 against the total $70,000 available to be drawn down. The balance payable on this note payable in the amount of $80,000 as of November 30, 2010 (May 31, 2010 - $80,000).
On August 26, 2009, the Company issued an additional note payable in consideration of a draw down unsecured loan up to an aggregate of $300,000 over a term of one year. Interest is payable at the prime rate plus 2%. Principal and interest are due on August 26, 2010 unless demanded earlier. This has been extended for another year under the same terms. On August 26, 2009, the Company borrowed $100,000 against the total $300,000 available to be drawn down. On March 3, 2010, the Company borrowed $75,000 against the total $200,000 available to be drawn down. On August 24, 2010, the Company borrowed $30,000 against the total $125,000 available to be drawn down. On September 27, 2010, the Company borrowed $10,000 against the total $95,000 available to be drawn down. On November 1, 2010, the Company borrowed $10,000 against the total $85,000 available to be drawn down leaving $75,000 further funds available to be drawn down. The balance payable on this note payable is $225,000 as of November 30, 2010 (May 31, 2010 - $175,000).
Interest expense amounted to $7,027 for the six month period ended November 30, 2010 (November 30, 2009 - $2,851) and is included in selling and administrative expense. As at November 30, 2010, accrued interest of $15,889 (May 31, 2010 - $8,862) is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
NOTE 9. CONVERTIBLE LOAN
A convertible debenture, issued March 11, 2005, was unsecured, matured March 11, 2010 and carried interest at a rate of 10% per annum. The instrument is convertible at the option of the holder into common shares of the Company at a rate of $0.05 per share, and may be redeemed at any time prior to maturity at the option of the holder, should certain conditions prevail. The holder of the debenture has signed agreements waiving interest accrued from March 11, 2005 through to March 10, 2011. This convertible debenture has not been repaid and is due on March 10, 2011.
- 16 -
PORTLOGIC SYSTEMS INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOVEMBER 30, 2010
(Amounts expressed in US Dollars)
NOTE 10. COMMITMENTS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
a)
On June 25, 2008, the Company advanced $9,807 to UOMO Media Inc. (“UOMO”). One director of the Company is also a director of UOMO. This advance was paid back to the Company on February 19, 2010. In April and May 2010, the Company advanced a total amount of $13,500 as a temporary loan again. In June 2010, a further $1,600 was advanced totaling the temporary loan to $15,100. As at November 30, 2010, this amount remains receivable from UOMO (May 31, 2010 – $13,500).
b)
On May 1, 2007, an independent contractor agreement was entered into under which compensation of $3,000 per month was to be paid to perform services as an officer to October 31, 2007. New agreements have been entered into with this contractor from November 1, 2007 to October 31, 2008 at $3,000 per month. The related service fee for the six month period ended November 30, 2010 amounted to $18,000 (November 30, 2009 - $18,000). The agreement has been continued on a month-to-month basis. As at November 30, 2010, the Company was in a credit balance of $600 owing to the officer (May 31, 2010 – balance owing of $8,593 made up of the following: $2,784 company credit card, $1,618 personal credit card, and $4,191 funds loaned to the Company personally by the officer).
c)
On August 1, 2010, an independent contractor agreement was entered into under which compensation of $2,000 per month was to be paid to perform services as an officer for a period of one year. The related service fee for the six month period ended November 30, 2010 amounted to $8,000.
NOTE 11. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On December 30, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company dismissed MSCM LLP as its independent registered public accounting firm. There were no disagreements with MSCM LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of MSCM, would have caused MSCM to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in its reports on the Company’s financial statements for such years.
On December 31, 2010, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved the engagement of George Stewart as its independent accountants for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2011 effective immediately.
- 17 -
Item 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
INTRODUCTION
The following management discussion and analysis compares our results of operations for the six months ended November 30, 2010 to the same period in 2009. This management discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this quarterly report for the six months ended November 30, 2010.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the risks described in this report and other reports we file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Although we believe the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, they relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations, except as required by law.
OVERVIEW
We incorporated on June 22, 2004 as Portlogic Systems Inc. under the laws of the State of Nevada. On June 5, 2008, the Company filed a Form S-1 Registration Statement under the United States Securities Act of 1933. It became effective June 24, 2008.
We are currently in the development stage and our business comprises developing and licensing portal software products and related services. We have developed a product that we license to our customers to enable them to operate their own online social networking portal without requiring any technical programming or website design skills. We have a financial year end of May 31.
On September 16, 2009, we incorporated a wholly-owned subsidiary, Sunlogic Energy Corporation in Panama City, Republic of Panama for the purpose of looking at solar and alternative green energy software and products. Initial operations include: capital formation; organization; website construction; target market identification; research costs; promotional materials costs; and marketing planning. To date, our subsidiary has not had any operations.
Since January 2010, we have expanded the scope of technology offerings to include marketing mobile applications solutions and kiosk hardware and software products. Portlogic’s product offering now include enterprise software solutions which fall into five principal product families: m2Meet, m2Bank, m2Market, m2Ticket, and m2Kiosk.
Our 5 divisions are as follows:
1.
m2Meet: A community networking software solution. Currently being developed from our proprietary web based source code. Internet and mobile users with similar interests will use m2Meet to socially network and connect using location based technology such as GPS.
2.
m2Bank: (Mobile to Bank) is a financial transactions system that facilitates bill payments, money transfers, and account management.
3.
m2Market: Mobile marketing solutions including a bluetooth push technology that is used to deliver marketing materials to mobile phones.
4.
m2Ticket: Mobile ticketing sales engine which manages the sale and delivery of tickets through mobile phones for the transportation and entertainment industry.
5.
m2Kiosk: A line of standard and custom kiosks hardware and software which integrates with mobile phone applications in the marketing, financial, and ticketing industries.
- 18 -
Due to the cost of developing the technology to offer such products we have decided to offer many of our products by bundling technology from third party suppliers. Agreements can include but are not limited to licensing agreements, reseller agreements, partnership agreements, memoranda of understanding, and software development agreements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission requirements for interim financial statements. Therefore, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2010.
The preparation of these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to the reported amounts of revenues and expenses, bad debt, investments, intangible assets, income taxes, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We consider the following accounting policies to be critical because the nature o f the estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change or because the impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Our cash equivalents comprise highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. As at November 30, 2010, cash equivalents amounted to $7,575 (May 31, 2010 - $8,007).
SOURCE CODE
We have capitalized the costs of acquiring computer source code in accordance with the provisions of the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) in ASC 985, “Costs of Software to Be Sold, Leased, or Marketed.” At each reporting period end, we analyze the realizability of our recorded software assets under the provisions of that statement. We recognize an impairment loss when and to the extent that the carrying amount of the software exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows that are expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Since the source code has started to generate positive cash flows and is still being used for development, no impairment loss has been recognized. Amortization is provided using the straight-line method over the asset’s estimated useful life, three years.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
We recognize revenue at the point of passage to the customer of title and risk of loss when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the sales price is determinable, and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
We recognize service revenues at the time of performance. Revenues billed in advance under contracts are deferred and recognized over the corresponding service periods.
- 19 -
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
The Company maintains its accounting records in US dollars, which is its functional and reporting currency. At the transaction date, each asset, liability, revenue and expense denominated in a foreign currency is translated into the functional currency by the use of the exchange rate in effect at that date. At the period end, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency by using the exchange rate in effect at that date. The resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are included in operations. Foreign exchange loss amounted to $1,879 for the six month period ended November 30, 2010 (November 30, 2009 – $2,965).
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS ADOPTED
In April 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU” or “Update”) No. 2010–17, “Revenue Recognition - Milestone Method.” The objective of this Update is to provide guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. The amendments in this Update are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this pronouncement will have a significant effect on its unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
In February 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, “Subsequent Events” (Topic 855) Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2010-09”). ASU 2010-09 amends disclosure requirements within Subtopic 855-10. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and the SEC’s requirements. ASU 2010-09 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (“ASU 2010-06”) (codified within ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures). ASU 2010-06 improves disclosures originally required under SFAS No. 157. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those years. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2010-09 to have a material impact on its unaudited interim consolidated results of operations or financial position.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, “Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements,” a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (“ASU 2009-13”) (codified within ASC Topic 605). ASU 2009-13 addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of ASU 2009-13 on its unaudited interim consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
COMPARISON OF RESULTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010 AND NOVEMBER 30, 2009
REVENUE
For the six months ended November 30, 2010, we recognized $1,782 in revenue. For the six months ended November 30, 2009, we recognized $5,491 in revenue. The decrease in revenue for the current period was due to focus of management on finding revenue streams for our other solutions offerings with the change of our business model. However, all revenues in both six month periods were from dating revenues only derived from our propriety source code.
- 20 -
COST OF GOODS SOLD
We incurred $25,333 in cost of goods sold for both six month periods ended November 30, 2010 and 2009, made up entirely of amortization of our source code, which we include in cost of goods sold. The work completed to earn revenue in both six month periods was provided in-house using our source code. Amortization of our source code commenced March 1, 2008 when it became apparent that the source code was being used to generate revenue.
EXPENSES
During the six months ended November 30, 2010, we incurred total expenses of $87,179 comprised of selling and administrative expense of $85,961 and depreciation of $1,218; compared with total expenses of $76,712 comprised of selling and administrative expense of $75,713 and depreciation of $999 for the same period in 2009. The largest expense for both periods pertained to consulting and professional fees. Expenses incurred during both six month periods remained the same with the exception of higher legal expense of $6,030 in 2010 vs. $50 in the prior period, and filing fees of $5,333 in 2010 vs. $1,963 in 2009.
NET INCOME/LOSS
During the six months ended November 30, 2010, we incurred a net loss of $110,730 compared with a net loss of $96,554 for the six months ended November 30, 2009. The increase in net loss was due to lower revenue in the six months ended November 30, 2010 and higher selling and administrative expenses due to the adjustment to legal expense from the prior period pertaining to the May 31, 2010 year end, as well as additional filing fees incurred in 2010.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We do not yet have an adequate source of reliable, long-term revenue to fund operations. The Company is in the development stage and is in the process of developing a series of web-based community portal products as well as a series of off-the-shelf template based websites. Sale of one of these products commenced during the 2008 fiscal year. We have no significant assets or financial resources. The amount of working capital that we will require depends on several factors, including without limitation, the extent and timing of sales of our products and related services, future costs of development, the timing and costs associated with the expansion of our customer support capabilities, and our operating results.
As of November 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $10,699. We had total current assets of $29,238.
In order to ensure we continue to generate cash revenues, during the next nine months, we have expanded the scope of technology offerings to include marketing mobile applications solutions and kiosk hardware and software products. As we have been recognizing revenues during this time, we intend to continue further product development of our social networking portal software. Our proprietary web based community software will be further developed for mobile use in our m2Meet division. However, our product offering now includes enterprise software solutions which fall into five principal product families: m2Meet, m2Bank, m2Market, m2Ticket, and m2Kiosk as follows:
1.
m2Meet: A community networking software solution. Currently being developed from our proprietary web based source code. Internet and mobile users with similar interests will use m2Meet to socially network and connect using location based technology such as GPS.
2.
m2Bank: (Mobile to Bank) is a financial transactions system that facilitates bill payments, money transfers, and account management.
3.
m2Market: Mobile marketing solutions including a bluetooth push technology that is used to deliver marketing materials to mobile phones.
4.
m2Ticket: Mobile ticketing sales engine which manages the sale and delivery of tickets through mobile phones for the transportation and entertainment industry.
5.
m2Kiosk: A line of standard and custom kiosks hardware and software which integrates with mobile phone applications in the marketing, financial, and ticketing industries.
Due to the cost of developing the technology to offer such products we have decided to offer many of our products by bundling technology from third party suppliers. Agreements can include but are not limited to licensing
- 21 -
agreements, reseller agreements, partnership agreements, memoranda of understanding, and software development agreements. We anticipate that we will require $500,000 in total, over the next 6 months, to fund the start up of each of these divisions. We anticipate launching each division, individually, as technology solutions providers are in place. We need to be assured that we have strong presentation support, an organized implementation strategy and ongoing technical support. As we sign more technology partners with proven large scale application experience, we will begin to hire project managers and begin marketing our solutions to targeted potential clients.
Any additional cash revenues that we generate from our operations will ease the burden on our cash and enable us to finance operations beyond the next 6 months. If we generate no cash revenues other than the $10,699 that we had available as of November 30, 2010, we will need to raise additional funds during the next 6 months. Potential sources of such working capital could include senior debt facilities, new lines of credit, bank financings or additional sales of our securities. If we raise funds through the sale of our securities, the common stock currently outstanding would be diluted. There is a risk that such additional financing may not be available, or may not be available on acceptable terms, and the inability to obtain additional financing or generate sufficient cash from operations could require us to reduce or eliminate expenditures for capital equipment, production, or marketing of our products, or otherwise curtail or discontinue our operations, which could hav e a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
On August 26, 2009, the Company issued a note payable in consideration of a draw down unsecured loan up to an aggregate of $300,000 over a term of one year. Interest is payable at the prime rate plus 2%. Principal and interest are now due on August 26, 2011 unless demanded earlier.
As of November 30, 2010, the Company borrowed $225,000 against the total $300,000 available to be drawn down.
Prior to this, on July 18, 2008, the Company had issued a note payable in consideration of a draw down unsecured loan up to an aggregate of $100,000 over a term of one year. The Company borrowed $80,000 against this loan.
Our unaudited interim consolidatedfinancial statements have been prepared on a continuing operation basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.
As of November 30, 2010, our total assets were $44,960, our total liabilities were $387,730, and stockholders’ deficiency was $342,770.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET TRANSACTION
We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this Item.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures can be relied upon to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management. Our disclosure controls and procedures are
- 22 -
designed to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management. Our disclosure controls and procedures include components of our internal control over financial reporting. Management's assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is expressed at the level of reasonable assurance that the control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We have assessed the effectiveness of those internal controls as of November 30, 2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) inInternal Control—Integrated Framework.
Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement
preparation and presentation.
A material weakness in internal controls is a deficiency in internal control, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects a company's ability to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report external financial data reliably in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the company's annual or interim financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected. In the course of making our assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. This material weakness consisted of inadequate staffing within the accounting operations of our Company. The small number of employees who are responsible for accounting functions prevents us from segregating duties within our internal control system. The inadequate segregation of duties is a weakness because it could lead to the untimely identification and resolution of accounting and disclosure matters or could lead to a failure to perform timely and effective reviews. Due to this material weakness, management could not conclude that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of November 30, 2010.
Our review also indicated the existence of certain high level procedures that might or might not serve to provide compensating control over these weaknesses. These procedures consisted of analytical review of key operating results by our senior management, including preparation and review of monthly operating results, comparison of such results to budgets and to historical amounts. In addition, the board of directors received monthly updates on operations, and on a quarterly basis, reviews, investigates and discusses apparent inconsistencies and concerns with senior operating management.
Our review also revealed that although a number of controls appeared to exist, and were observed to have been in operation, documentary evidence that such controls were operating throughout the period was found to be lacking. Such evidence as signatures indicating that a certain procedure had been carried out and affixing responsibility were lacking in the internal control system.
This quarterly report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this quarterly report.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended November 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
- 23 -
PART II
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
We may be involved from time to time in ordinary litigation, negotiation and settlement matters that will not have a material effect on our operations or finances. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation against us or our officers and directors in their capacity as such that could have a material impact on our operations or finances.
ITEM 1A.
Risk Factors
Risks Relating To Our Business
We intend to grow our Company by acquisition and further development of our source code, and if we are not successful, our business will be harmed.
Our business strategy includes the attainment of a portion of our growth through our ability to successfully execute our acquisition model and further develop our source code. In order to pursue a growth by acquisition strategy successfully, we must identify suitable candidates for these transactions, complete these transactions, and manage post-closing issues such as integration of the acquired business into our corporate structure. Integration issues are complex, time-consuming, and expensive and, without proper planning and implementation, could significantly disrupt our business. Potential disruptions include diversion of management's attention, loss of key business and/or personnel from the acquired company, unanticipated events, and legal liabilities. If the business becomes impaired, there could be partial or full write-offs attributed to the acquisition.
Our continued operations are contingent on our ability to raise additional capital and obtain financing and success in future operations. If we do not acquire sufficient additional funding or alternative sources of capital to meet our working capital, we may have to substantially curtail our operations and business plan. If we do not achieve sufficient revenues to meet our future obligations, we intend to seek sufficient financial resources by issuing shares of common stock, borrowing cash from a bank or one of our directors, or a combination of these activities. We may be unable to obtain additional financing using any of these methods. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. However, our unaudited interim consolidatedfinancial statements do not include any adjustments that might result if we are unable to continue our business.
We have a limited operating history and may never achieve or sustain profitable operations.
We have a short operating history and have not been profitable since our incorporation in June 2004. Since inception until November 30, 2010, we have derived ancillary revenues by providing website layout and web portal design services, as well as software licensing. Although our main web-based community portal products are still being developed, we realized some revenues, starting mostly in September 2007, for providing dating software websites. We have currently changed our business model to mobile solutions applications marketing. Even if we obtain future revenues sufficient to expand operations, increased operational or marketing expenses could adversely affect our liquidity. The limited extent of our assets and revenues, our early stage of development, and our limited operating history make us subject to the risks associated with start-up companies, including potentially negative cash flows. We have no significant assets or financial resources. Our lack of operating history makes it very difficult for you to make an investment decision. We may never become profitable. You may lose your entire investment.
We depend on our officers and directors to perform our business activities and our ability to recruit and retain the qualified individuals needed to operate and develop our business is unknown.
We rely on our officers and directors to perform many of our business activities. Currently, our Chief Executive Officer, Rafik Jallad oversees our technology needs. Our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer, Jueane Thiessen, personally performs most of our accounting and financial management functions, and liases with external contractors who provide additional programming and consulting services. Both Mr. Jallad and Ms. Thiessen are involved in carrying out our sales activities. Our present management structure, although adequate for the early stage of our operations, will likely have to be significantly augmented as our operations expand. Our future success will depend in part on the services of our key personnel and, additionally, on our ability to identify, hire and retain additional qualified personnel. There is intense competition for qualified management, marketing, accounting, and
- 24 -
sales personnel in our new business line: marketing mobile application solutions. We may not be able to continue to attract and retain the personnel needed to operate and develop our business. Because we rely on our officers and directors to perform our sales, accounting, and financial management activities, failure to attract and retain key personnel could have a material adverse effect on us.
We have limited cash which we anticipate will be insufficient to fund our plan of operations for the six months ending May 31, 2011 and if we are unable to raise additional capital, our business may fail and stockholders may lose their entire investment.
We have limited capital reserves to finance expansion or to protect us from a downturn in business. We currently do not have sufficient cash to fund operations for the six months ending May 31, 2011. We will need to raise additional funds to fully fund our operations for the next six month period beginning December 1, 2010. Additional financing may come in the form of an offering of common shares, borrowing from a bank or one of our directors, or from revenues generated by new business. If additional shares are issued to raise capital, our existing stockholders will suffer a dilution of their stock ownership and the value of our outstanding shares may fall. If we borrow more money, we will have to pay interest and may also have to agree to restrictions that limit our operating flexibility. We have no commitments for additional financing and there can be no assurance that additional funds will be available when needed, or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If adequ ate funds are not available we may be required to change our planned business strategies. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing, we may not be able to successfully develop and market our products and services. As a result, we would need to curtail business operations which would have a material negative effect on operating results, the value of our outstanding stock is likely to fall, and our business may fail causing our stockholders to lose their entire investment.
Our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer, Jueane Thiessen, also serves as our sole director. This interrelationship may create conflicts of interest that might be detrimental to us.
There are various interrelationships between our officers and directors that may create conflicts of interest that might be detrimental to us. Our sole director, Jueane Thiessen, was our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer for the six months ending November 30, 2010. Our Board of Directors, which appoints our officers, currently consists of a sole director, Ms. Thiessen, giving Ms. Thiessen control of all of the voting power of the Board of Directors. Because Ms. Thiessen is both a director and an officer, there exists a potential conflict of interest regarding the decision to remove our officers or appoint new officers. Mr. Rafik Jallad, as Chief Executive Officer is our only other officer.
We may be subject to foreign currency fluctuation and such fluctuation may adversely affect our financial position and results.
We are currently located in Canada and pay most of our expenses in United States dollars. However, our target market is global. Almost all of our technology suppliers are based in Europe. We may enter into contracts that require customers to pay us in currencies other than United States dollars. Therefore, our potential operations make us subject to foreign currency fluctuation. We do not make investments that offset the risk of adverse foreign currency fluctuations and we may suffer increased expenses and overall losses as a result.
We do not own patents on our products and, if other companies copy our products, our revenues may decline which may result in a decrease in our stock price.
We do not own patents on our products we have developed and we do not currently intend to file for patent protection on those products. Therefore, another company could recreate our products and could compete against us, which would adversely affect our revenues.
We do not carry any insurance and we may be subject to significant lawsuits which could substantially increase our expenses.
- 25 -
We do not carry any insurance. There are a number of occurrences that could adversely affect our financial condition. These include damage to our assets, financial records, or other property by fire or water, as well as any successful lawsuits against us involving recovery of damages arising out of our contractual, legal, or other duties. Should such an uninsured loss occur, our costs may substantially increase which would lower our overall profitability, if any.
Amendments to telecommunications regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business by increasing the cost of our operations or the costs that customers must incur to use our products and services.
We use telecommunications services to deliver our online software licensing and programming services to customers. In addition, our customers typically require telecommunications systems to use our products and services. The telecommunications industry is subject to regulatory control. Any amendments to current regulations in any jurisdiction where we operate or where our customers conduct business could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and prospects. If amendments to regulations increase the cost of using telecommunications services, our operating expenses may increase. Additionally, if regulatory amendments increase the cost that our customers must incur to use our services, we may experience difficulty attracting new customers or retaining existing customers.
Equipment loss or malfunctions and telecommunication service interruptions or delays may adversely affect our ability to provide our products and services.
Our business is highly dependent on our computer and telecommunications equipment and software systems for the operation and quality of our services. The temporary or permanent loss of all or a portion of these systems, including as a result of physical damage or operating malfunction, or significant replacement delays, could have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Any interruptions, delays or capacity problems experienced on the Internet or with telephone services could adversely affect our ability to provide our products and services.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
N/A
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
During the second quarter of our fiscal year ended May 31, 2011, no matter was submitted to a vote of security holders through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
- 26 -
Item 6. Exhibits
The exhibits listed below are filed as part of or incorporated by reference in this report.
Exhibit
No. Identification of Exhibit
10.1
Independent Contractor Agreement between Portlogic Systems Inc. and Rafik Jallad, dated August 1, 2010 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed August 6, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2
Memorandum of Understanding Agreement between Portlogic Systems Inc. and Innova Bilisim Cozumleri A.S., dated August 16, 2010 (included as Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed August 19, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
17.1
Resignation of Edvard Halupa dated November 15, 2010 (included as Exhibit 17.1 to the Form 8-K filed November 16, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
21.1
Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).
31.1
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
Certification of the Chief Technology Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
Certification of Officers pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
- 27 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Portlogic Systems Inc.
(Registrant)
By
/s/ Rafik Jallad
Chief Executive Officer
Date
January 14, 2011
By
/s/ Jueane Thiessen
Principal Accounting Officer, and
Treasurer
Date
January 14, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following person on behalf of the registrant and in the capacity and on the date indicated.
By
/s/ Jueane Thiessen
Jueane Thiessen
Director
Date
January 14, 2011
- 28 -
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
I, Rafik Jallad, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report of Portlogic Systems Inc.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: January 14, 2011
/s/ Rafik Jallad
--------------------------------------
By: Rafik Jallad
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2
- 29 -
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
I, Jueane Thiessen, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report of Portlogic Systems Inc.;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: January 14, 2011
/s/ Jueane Thiessen
--------------------------------------
By: Jueane Thiessen
Principal Accounting Officer, and Treasurer
- 30 -
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Portlogic Systems Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:
The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the six month period ended November 30, 2010 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: January 14, 2011
/s/ Rafik Jallad
-------------------------------------
By: Rafik Jallad
Chief Executive Officer
Date: January 14, 2011
/s/ Jueane Thiessen
-------------------------------------
By: Jueane Thiessen
Principal Accounting Officer, and Treasurer
- 31 -