SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 3 Months Ended |
May 31, 2013 |
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies Policies | |
Use of Estimates | The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates in the accompanying consolidated financial statements include the depreciable lives of property and equipment, valuation of share-based payments and the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ from those estimates and would impact future results of operations and cash flows. |
Reclassification of Prior Year Financial Statements | The Company has reclassified, where appropriate, the prior year financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments with an original maturity of twelve months or less to be cash equivalents. At May 31, 2013 and February 28, 2013, respectively, the Company had $31 and $2 in cash equivalents. |
Property and Equipment | Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the assets estimated useful lives of 10 years. Upon sale or retirement of property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter. |
Mineral Property and Exploration Costs | The Company has been in the exploration stage since April 13, 2006 and has not yet realized sustainable revenues from its planned operations. It is primarily engaged in attempting to acquire, explore, and develop mining properties and attempting the wholesale distribution and sale of diamonds and precious gemstones. In accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Industry Guide 7, mineral property acquisition costs and exploration costs are expensed to operations as incurred. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing probable and then proven reserves, the costs then incurred to develop such property are capitalized. Such costs will be amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable-proven reserves. If mineral properties are subsequently abandoned or impaired, any capitalized costs will be charged to operations. |
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets | The Company accounts for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets according to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 360 Property, Plant and Equipment. ASC 360 clarifies the accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of, including the disposal of business segments and major lines of business. Long-lived assets are reviewed when facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset might not be recoverable. When necessary, impaired assets are written down to estimate fair value based on the best information available. Estimated fair value is generally based on either appraised value or measured by discounting estimated future cash flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate discounted future cash flows. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from such estimates. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments | FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 states that a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. In addition, ASC 820 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the types of valuation information (inputs) are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entitys own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The twelve broad levels defined by ASC 820 hierarchy are as follows: Level 1 quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. Level 3 valuations derived from methods in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable in the markets. These financial instruments are measured using managements best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment to estimation. Valuations based on unobservable inputs are highly subjective and require significant judgments. Changes in such judgments could have a material impact on fair value estimates. In addition, since estimates are as of a specific point in time, they are susceptible to material near-term changes. Changes in economic conditions August also dramatically affect the estimated fair values. Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of May 31, 2013. The respective carrying value of certain financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. These financial instruments include accounts payable and accrued expenses, and related party payables. The fair value of the Companys notes payable is estimated based on current rates that would be available for debt of similar terms which is not significantly different from its stated value. |
Revenue Recognition | The Company recognized revenue on arrangements in accordance with ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition |
Environmental Costs | Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are expensed. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable, and the cost can be reasonably estimated. Generally, the timing of these accruals coincides with the earlier of completion of a feasibility study or the Companys commitments to plan of action based on the then known facts. |
Stock Based Compensation | The Company accounts for Stock-Based Compensation under ASC 718 Compensation Stock Compensation, which addresses the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, with a primary focus on transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. ASC 718-10 is a revision to SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance. ASC 718-10 requires measurement of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). Incremental compensation costs arising from subsequent modifications of awards after the grant date must be recognized. The Company accounts for stock-based compensation awards to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505-50 Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees (ASC 505-50). Under ASC 505-50, the Company determines the fair value of the warrants or stock-based compensation awards granted as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. Any stock options issued to non-employees are recorded in expense and additional paid-in capital in shareholders equity/(deficit) over the applicable service periods using variable accounting through the vesting dates based on the fair value of the options at the end of each period. The Company has not adopted a stock option plan and has not granted any stock options as of May 31, 2013. |
Income Taxes | Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method, future tax liabilities and assets are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the amounts reported in the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Future tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted or substantially enacted income tax rates expected to apply when the asset is realized or the liability settled. The effect of a change in income tax rates on future income tax liabilities and assets is recognized in income in the period that the change occurs. Future income tax assets are recognized to the extent that they are considered more likely than not to be realized. The FASB has issued ASC 740 Income Taxes (formerly, Financial Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48)). ASC 740 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with prior literature FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This standard requires a company to determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based upon the technical merits of the position. If the more-likely-than-not threshold is met, a company must measure the tax position to determine the amount to recognize in the financial statements. As a result of the implementation of this standard, the Company performed a review of its material tax positions in accordance with recognition and measurement standards established by FASB ASC 740 and concluded that the tax position of the Company has not met the more-likely-than-not threshold as of May 31, 2013. |
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share | The Company computes income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share, which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the statement of operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential shares of common stock outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. As of May 31, 2013 there were 131,785,714 potentially dilutive shares that could be issued if the common stock conversion feature contained in the convertible notes payable were exercised. |
Emerging Growth Company | We qualify as an emerging growth company under the 2012 JOBS Act. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. As an emerging growth company, we can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to take advantage of the benefits of this extended transition period. |
Effect of Recent Accounting Pronouncements | In October 2012, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2012-04, Technical Corrections and Improvements in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. In August 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-22 (SEC Update) in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-03. This update amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of SAB No. 114. The adoption of ASU 2012-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-10, Development Stage Entities which eliminated the definition of a development stage entity from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and removed the additional disclosure requirements for such entities. The Company did not issue any financial statements subsequent to the implementation of ASU 2014-10. The Company adopted the early application of the provisions of ASU 2014-10. The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations. |