UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
|
| | |
þ | | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2014 |
OR
|
| | |
o | | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| | FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM __________TO __________ |
Commission file number: 333-163942
ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
___________________________________________________
|
| | |
Delaware | | 74-2849682 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | | Identification No.) |
12700 Park Central Dr., Suite 1600, Dallas, Texas 75251
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(972) 367-3600
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
___________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| | | |
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ | Smaller reporting company o |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The registrant is a subsidiary of Alon USA Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and there is no market for the registrant's common stock. As of May 1, 2014, 50,111 shares of the registrant's Class A Common stock, par value $0.01, and 90 shares of the registrant's Class B Common stock, par value $0.01, were outstanding.
The Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instructions H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format permitted by General Instruction H(2).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| |
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
| (unaudited) | | |
ASSETS | | | |
Current assets: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 1,022 |
| | $ | — |
|
Accounts and other receivables, net | 21,507 |
| | 30,431 |
|
Inventories | 50,629 |
| | 37,906 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 548 |
| | 315 |
|
Total current assets | 73,706 |
| | 68,652 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net | 330,171 |
| | 333,599 |
|
Other assets, net | 15,361 |
| | 16,600 |
|
Total assets | $ | 419,238 |
| | $ | 418,851 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | |
Current liabilities: | | | |
Accounts payable | $ | 343,729 |
| | $ | 355,732 |
|
Accrued liabilities | 19,373 |
| | 29,784 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt | 75,928 |
| | 75,684 |
|
Total current liabilities | 439,030 |
| | 461,200 |
|
Other non-current liabilities | 34,819 |
| | 37,039 |
|
Total liabilities | 473,849 |
| | 498,239 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
| |
|
Stockholders’ equity: | | | |
Class A Common stock, par value $0.01, 75,000 shares authorized; 50,111 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 | — |
| | — |
|
Class B Common stock, par value $0.01, 1,000 shares authorized; 90 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 | — |
| | — |
|
Additional paid-in capital | 312,381 |
| | 312,381 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax | 1,875 |
| | (29,982 | ) |
Retained deficit | (368,867 | ) | | (361,787 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity | (54,611 | ) | | (79,388 | ) |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 419,238 |
| | $ | 418,851 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
1
ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Net sales | $ | 636,031 |
| | $ | 620,281 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: | | | |
Cost of sales | 601,003 |
| | 551,180 |
|
Direct operating expenses | 25,484 |
| | 23,267 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 2,007 |
| | 2,098 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 6,799 |
| | 6,026 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses | 635,293 |
| | 582,571 |
|
Operating income | 738 |
| | 37,710 |
|
Interest expense | (7,824 | ) | | (10,196 | ) |
Other income, net | 6 |
| | 7 |
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense | (7,080 | ) | | 27,521 |
|
Income tax expense | — |
| | — |
|
Net income (loss) | $ | (7,080 | ) | | $ | 27,521 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC.
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(unaudited, dollars in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Net income (loss) | $ | (7,080 | ) | | $ | 27,521 |
|
Other comprehensive income: | | | |
Commodity contracts designated as cash flow hedges: | | | |
Unrealized holding gain arising during period | 23,582 |
| | 9,381 |
|
Loss reclassified to earnings - cost of sales | — |
| | 24 |
|
Amortization of unrealized loss on de-designated cash flow hedges - cost of sales | 8,275 |
| | — |
|
Net gain, before tax | 31,857 |
| | 9,405 |
|
Income tax expense | — |
| | — |
|
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax | 31,857 |
| | 9,405 |
|
Comprehensive income | $ | 24,777 |
| | $ | 36,926 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited, dollars in thousands) |
| | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | | |
Net income (loss) | $ | (7,080 | ) | | $ | 27,521 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 6,799 |
| | 6,026 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs | 240 |
| | 587 |
|
Amortization of original issuance discount | 244 |
| | 607 |
|
Unrealized loss on commodity swaps | 6,606 |
| | — |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
| |
|
|
Accounts and other receivables, net | 9,676 |
| | 6,977 |
|
Inventories | (12,723 | ) | | (11,354 | ) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (233 | ) | | 591 |
|
Accounts payable | (12,003 | ) | | (40,948 | ) |
Accrued liabilities | 4,917 |
| | 9,347 |
|
Other non-current liabilities | 6,951 |
| | 5,176 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities | 3,394 |
| | 4,530 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: | | | |
Capital expenditures | (1,997 | ) | | (2,262 | ) |
Capital expenditures for turnarounds and catalysts | (375 | ) | | (2,427 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | (2,372 | ) | | (4,689 | ) |
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 1,022 |
| | (159 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | — |
| | 1,107 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 1,022 |
| | $ | 948 |
|
Supplemental cash flow information: | | | |
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest | $ | 6,201 |
| | $ | 1,670 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
As used in this report, the terms "the Company," "we," "us" or "our" refer to Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc., a subsidiary of Alon USA Energy, Inc. References in this report to "Alon Energy" or "Parent" refer collectively to Alon USA Energy, Inc. and any of its subsidiaries, other than Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc.
These financial statements and notes are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
In the opinion of our management, the information included in these financial statements reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. Certain prior year balances may have been aggregated or disaggregated in order to conform to the current year presentation. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be obtained for the year ending December 31, 2014.
The balance sheet as of December 31, 2013, has been derived from the audited financial statements as of that date. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
| |
(2) | Operating Results and Liquidity |
Our refinery average throughput was 62,067 barrels per day for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $3,394.
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash generated from our operating activities, inventory supply and offtake arrangements, credit lines and additional funding from Alon Energy. Accounts payable to Alon Energy and its subsidiaries of $273,144 at March 31, 2014, while due on demand, are expected to be paid as funds are available. Future operating results will depend on market factors, primarily the difference between the prices we receive from customers for produced products compared to the prices we pay to suppliers for crude oil. We plan to continue to operate the refinery at current or higher utilization rates as long as the refinery is able to generate cash operating margin. Management believes its current liquidity from the above described sources is adequate to operate the refinery.
We have senior secured notes due October 2014 with an outstanding balance (net of unamortized discount) of $75,928 at March 31, 2014. We plan to repay this outstanding balance using cash from operating activities and funding from Alon Energy. As an alternative, we would consider the issuance of new debt to allow for the repayment of the outstanding senior secured notes balance.
We determine fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We classify financial assets and financial liabilities into the following fair value hierarchy:
| |
• | Level 1 - valued based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities; |
| |
• | Level 2 - valued based on quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and |
| |
• | Level 3 - valued based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
As required, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs (levels 1 and 2) and minimize the use of unobservable inputs (level 3) within the fair value hierarchy. We generally apply the “market approach” to determine fair value. This method uses pricing and other information generated by market transactions for identical or comparable assets and liabilities. Assets and liabilities are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level (least observable) input that is significant to the measurement in its entirety.
ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
The carrying amounts of our cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities. The reported amounts of long-term debt approximate fair value. Derivative instruments are carried at fair value, which are based on quoted market prices. Derivative instruments and the Renewable Identification Numbers ("RINs") obligation are our only assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
The RINs obligation represents the period-end deficit for the purchase of RINs to satisfy the requirement to blend biofuels into the products we have produced. Our RINs obligation is based on the RINs deficit and the market price of those RINs as of the balance sheet date. The RINs obligation is categorized as level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and is measured at fair value using the market approach based on quoted prices from an independent pricing service.
The following table sets forth the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by input level, in the balance sheets at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
As of March 31, 2014 | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Commodity contracts (futures and forwards) | $ | 419 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 419 |
|
Commodity contracts (swaps) | — |
| | 1,644 |
| | — |
| | 1,644 |
|
Fair value hedge | — |
| | 3,503 |
| | — |
| | 3,503 |
|
RINs obligation | — |
| | 5,087 |
| | — |
| | 5,087 |
|
| | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2013 | | | | | | | |
Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
Commodity contracts (futures and forwards) | $ | 310 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 310 |
|
Commodity contracts (swaps) | — |
| | 15,328 |
| | 11,569 |
| | 26,897 |
|
Fair value hedge | — |
| | 2,676 |
| | — |
| | 2,676 |
|
Level 3 Financial Instruments
As of December 31, 2013, we had commodity price swap contracts related to forecasted sales of jet fuel and forecasted purchases of crude oil for which quoted forward market prices were not readily available. The forward rate used to value these commodity price swaps was derived using a projected forward rate using quoted market rates for similar products, adjusted for product grade differentials, a level 3 input. As quoted forward market prices for these commodities became available during the three months ended March 31, 2014, we reclassified the related financial liability to level 2.
The following table presents the changes in fair value of our level 3 assets and liabilities (all related to commodity price swap contracts) for the three months ended March 31, 2014:
|
| | | | |
| | For the Three Months Ended |
| | March 31, 2014 |
Balance at beginning of period | | $ | (11,569 | ) |
Change in fair value of level 3 trades open at the beginning of the period | | — |
|
Fair value of trades entered into during the period | | — |
|
Fair value of reclassification from level 3 to level 2 | | 11,569 |
|
Settlement value of contractual maturities - Recognized in cost of sales | | — |
|
Balance at end of period | | $ | — |
|
| |
(4) | Derivative Financial Instruments |
Mark to Market
Commodity Derivatives. We selectively utilize crude oil and refined product commodity derivative contracts to reduce the risk associated with potential price changes on committed obligations. We do not speculate using derivative instruments. Credit risk on our derivative instruments is mitigated by transacting with counterparties meeting established collateral and credit criteria.
ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
Fair Value Hedge
Fair value hedges are used to hedge price volatility of certain refining inventories and firm commitments to purchase inventories. The gain or loss on a derivative instrument designated and qualifying as a fair value hedge, as well as the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, is recognized in earnings in the same period.
As of March 31, 2014, we have accounted for certain commodity contracts as fair value hedges with contract purchase volumes of 350 thousand barrels of crude oil with remaining contract terms through May 2019.
Cash Flow Hedges
To designate a derivative as a cash flow hedge, we document at the inception of the hedge the assessment that the derivative will be highly effective in offsetting expected changes in cash flows from the item hedged. This assessment, which is updated at least quarterly, is generally based on the most recent relevant historical correlation between the derivative and the item hedged. If, during the term of the derivative, the hedge is determined to be no longer highly effective, hedge accounting is prospectively discontinued and any remaining unrealized gains or losses, based on the effective portion of the derivative at that date, are reclassified to earnings when the underlying transactions occur.
Commodity Derivatives. As of March 31, 2014, we have accounted for certain commodity swap contracts as cash flow hedges with total contract purchase volumes of 5,220 thousand barrels of crude oil and net contract sales volumes of 5,220 thousand barrels of refined products with a remaining contract term of twenty-one months. Related to these transactions in Other Comprehensive Income ("OCI"), we recognized unrealized gains of $31,857 and $9,405 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
In November 2013, we elected to de-designate certain commodity swap contracts that were previously designated as cash flow hedges. Consequently, hedge accounting was discontinued for the commodity swap contracts and prospectively all changes in fair value were recorded in cost of sales in the statements of operations. The commodity derivative contracts were subsequently re-designated as cash flow hedges as of December 31, 2013 on a product basis. As of March 31, 2014, we have unrealized losses of $21,707 classified in OCI that related to the application of hedge accounting prior to de-designation that will be recorded into earnings as the underlying forecasted transactions occur through the remainder of 2014. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we reclassified $8,275 of losses related to these de-designated cash flow hedges from OCI into cost of sales.
For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, there was no hedge ineffectiveness recognized in income. No component of the derivative instruments’ gains or losses was excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
The following table presents the effect of derivative instruments on the statements of financial position:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of March 31, 2014 |
| Asset Derivatives | | Liability Derivatives |
| Balance Sheet | | | | Balance Sheet | | |
| Location | | Fair Value | | Location | | Fair Value |
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | | |
Commodity contracts (futures and forwards) | Accounts receivable | | $ | 358 |
| | Accrued liabilities | | $ | 777 |
|
Commodity contracts (swaps) | Accounts receivable | | (790 | ) | | | | — |
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | | | $ | (432 | ) | | | | $ | 777 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | | |
Commodity contracts (swaps) | Accounts receivable | | $ | 1,544 |
| | Other non-current liabilities | | $ | 2,398 |
|
Fair value hedge | | | — |
| | Other non-current liabilities | | 3,503 |
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments | | | 1,544 |
| | | | 5,901 |
|
Total derivatives | | | $ | 1,112 |
| | | | $ | 6,678 |
|
ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of December 31, 2013 |
| Asset Derivatives | | Liability Derivatives |
| Balance Sheet | | | | Balance Sheet | | |
| Location | | Fair Value | | Location | | Fair Value |
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | | |
Commodity contracts (futures and forwards) | Accounts receivable | | $ | 607 |
| | Accrued liabilities | | $ | 917 |
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments | | | $ | 607 |
| | | | $ | 917 |
|
| | | | | | | |
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: | | | | | | | |
Commodity contracts (swaps) | | | $ | — |
| | Accrued liabilities | | $ | 15,328 |
|
Commodity contracts (swaps) | | | — |
| | Other non-current liabilities | | 11,569 |
|
Fair value hedge | | | — |
| | Other non-current liabilities | | 2,676 |
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments | | | — |
| | | | 29,573 |
|
Total derivatives | | | $ | 607 |
| | | | $ | 30,490 |
|
The following tables present the effect of derivative instruments on the statements of operations and accumulated other comprehensive income:
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Flow Hedging Relationships | | Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI | | Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion) | | Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) |
| | | | Location | | Amount | | Location | | Amount |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 | | | | | | | | |
Commodity contracts (swaps) | | $ | 31,857 |
| | Cost of sales | | $ | (8,275 | ) | | | | $ | — |
|
Total derivatives | | $ | 31,857 |
| | | | $ | (8,275 | ) | | | | $ | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 | | | | | | | | |
Commodity contracts (swaps) | | $ | 9,405 |
| | Cost of sales | | $ | (24 | ) | | | | $ | — |
|
Total derivatives | | $ | 9,405 |
| | | | $ | (24 | ) | | | | $ | — |
|
Derivatives in fair value hedging relationships:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income |
| | | For the Three Months Ended |
| | | March 31, |
| Location | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Fair value hedge | Cost of sales | | $ | (827 | ) | | $ | (1,928 | ) |
Total derivatives | | | $ | (827 | ) | | $ | (1,928 | ) |
ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income |
| | | For the Three Months Ended |
| | | March 31, |
| Location | | 2014 | | 2013 |
Commodity contracts (futures & forwards) | Cost of sales | | $ | 1,401 |
| | $ | (2,202 | ) |
Commodity contracts (swaps) | Cost of sales | | 2,037 |
| | — |
|
Total derivatives | | | $ | 3,438 |
| | $ | (2,202 | ) |
Offsetting Assets and Liabilities
Our derivative financial instruments are subject to master netting arrangements to manage counterparty credit risk associated with derivatives and we offset the fair value amounts recorded for derivative instruments to the extent possible under these agreements on our balance sheets.
The following table presents offsetting information regarding our derivatives by type of transaction as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets/Liabilities | | Gross Amounts offset in the Statement of Financial Position | | Net Amounts of Assets/Liabilities Presented in the Statement of Financial Position | | Gross Amounts Not offset in the Statement of Financial Position | | Net Amount |
| | | Financial Instruments | | Cash Collateral Pledged | |
As of March 31, 2014 | | | | | | | | | | |
Commodity Derivative Assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures & forwards | $ | 496 |
| | $ | (138 | ) | | $ | 358 |
| | $ | (358 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Swaps | 1,544 |
| | (790 | ) | | 754 |
| | (754 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Commodity Derivative Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures & forwards | $ | 915 |
| | $ | (138 | ) | | $ | 777 |
| | $ | (358 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 419 |
|
Swaps | 3,188 |
| | (790 | ) | | 2,398 |
| | (754 | ) | | — |
| | 1,644 |
|
Fair value hedge | 3,503 |
| | — |
| | 3,503 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,503 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2013 | | | | | | | | | | |
Commodity Derivative Assets: | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures & forwards | $ | 747 |
| | $ | (140 | ) | | $ | 607 |
| | $ | (607 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Commodity Derivative Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures & forwards | $ | 1,057 |
| | $ | (140 | ) | | $ | 917 |
| | $ | (607 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 310 |
|
Swaps | 26,897 |
| | — |
| | 26,897 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 26,897 |
|
Fair value hedge | 2,676 |
| | — |
| | 2,676 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,676 |
|
Compliance Program Market Risk
We are obligated by government regulations to blend a certain percentage of biofuels into the products we produce that are consumed in the U.S. We purchase biofuels from third parties and blend those biofuels into our products, and each gallon of biofuel purchased includes a RIN. To the degree we are unable to blend biofuels at the required percentage, a RINs deficit is generated and we must acquire that number of RINs by the annual reporting deadline in order to remain in compliance with applicable regulations.
We are exposed to market risk related to the volatility in the price of RINs needed to comply with these government regulations. We manage this risk by purchasing biofuel RINs when prices are deemed favorable utilizing fixed price purchase contracts. Some of these contracts are derivative instruments; however, we elect the normal purchase and sale exception and do not record these contracts at their fair values. The cost of meeting our obligations under these compliance programs was $5,087 for the three months ended March 31, 2014. This amount is reflected in cost of sales. Our refinery received an exemption from the Renewable Fuel Standard 2 requirements for 2013 and as a result, we did not record costs associated with RINs.
Our inventories (including inventory consigned to others) are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for crude oil, refined products and blendstock inventories. Materials and supplies are stated at average cost.
ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
Carrying value of inventories consisted of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Crude oil, refined products and blendstocks | $ | 15,789 |
| | $ | 11,710 |
|
Crude oil inventory consigned to others (Note 6) | 30,984 |
| | 22,545 |
|
Materials and supplies | 3,856 |
| | 3,651 |
|
Total inventories | $ | 50,629 |
| | $ | 37,906 |
|
Market values of crude oil, refined products and blendstock inventories exceeded LIFO costs by $16,718 and $13,600 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
| |
(6) | Inventory Financing Agreement |
We have entered into a Supply and Offtake Agreement and other associated agreements (together the “Supply and Offtake Agreement”) with J. Aron & Company (“J. Aron”). Pursuant to the Supply and Offtake Agreement, (i) J. Aron agreed to sell to us, and we agreed to buy from J. Aron, at market prices, crude oil for processing at the refinery and (ii) we agreed to sell, and J. Aron agreed to buy, at market prices, certain refined products produced at the refinery.
The Supply and Offtake Agreement also provided for the sale, at market prices, of our crude oil and certain refined product inventories to J. Aron, the lease to J. Aron of crude oil and refined product storage tanks located at our refinery, and to identify prospective purchasers of refined products on J. Aron’s behalf. The Supply and Offtake Agreement has an initial term that expires in May 2019. J. Aron may elect to terminate the Supply and Offtake Agreement prior to the initial term beginning in May 2016 and upon each anniversary thereof, on six months prior notice. We may elect to terminate in May 2018 on six months prior notice.
Following the expiration or termination of the Supply and Offtake Agreement, we are obligated to purchase the crude oil and refined product inventories then owned by J. Aron and located at the refinery.
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we had net current payables to J. Aron for purchases of $30,789 and $32,081, respectively, other non-current liabilities related to the original financing of $30,961 and $24,022, respectively, and a consignment inventory receivable representing a deposit paid to J. Aron of $6,206 and $6,206, respectively.
Additionally, we had net current receivables of $139 and net current payables of $990 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, for forward commitments related to month-end consignment inventory target levels differing from projected levels and the associated pricing with these inventory level differences.
In association with the Supply and Offtake Agreement, we entered into a secured Credit Agreement (the “Standby LC Facility”) by and between the Company, as Borrower, and Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as Issuing Bank. The Standby LC Facility provides for up to $200,000 of letters of credit to be issued to J. Aron. Obligations under the Standby LC Facility are secured by a first priority lien on our existing and future accounts receivable and inventory. The Standby LC Facility includes customary events of default and restrictions on our activities. The Standby LC Facility contains no maintenance financial covenants. At this time there is no further availability under the Standby LC Facility. The Standby LC Facility matures in July 2016.
| |
(7) | Property, Plant and Equipment, Net |
Property, plant and equipment, net consisted of the following: |
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Refining facilities | $ | 443,149 |
| | $ | 441,152 |
|
Accumulated depreciation | (112,978 | ) | | (107,553 | ) |
Property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 330,171 |
| | $ | 333,599 |
|
ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
| |
(8) | Additional Financial Information |
The tables that follow provide additional financial information related to the financial statements.
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Deferred turnaround and catalyst cost | $ | 6,597 |
| | $ | 7,585 |
|
Deferred debt issuance costs | 586 |
| | 826 |
|
Intangible assets | 1,972 |
| | 1,983 |
|
Long-term receivables | 6,206 |
| | 6,206 |
|
Total other assets | $ | 15,361 |
| | $ | 16,600 |
|
| |
(b) | Accrued Liabilities, Other Non-Current Liabilities and Accounts Payable |
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Accrued Liabilities: | | | |
Taxes other than income taxes | $ | 768 |
| | $ | 568 |
|
Employee costs | 1,315 |
| | 1,280 |
|
Commodity contracts | 777 |
| | 16,245 |
|
Accrued finance charges | 4,733 |
| | 3,597 |
|
Environmental compliance obligation | 5,087 |
| | — |
|
Other | 6,693 |
| | 8,094 |
|
Total accrued liabilities | $ | 19,373 |
| | $ | 29,784 |
|
| | | |
Other Non-Current Liabilities: | | | |
Environmental accrual (Note 11) | $ | 262 |
| | $ | 271 |
|
Asset retirement obligations | 1,198 |
| | 1,177 |
|
Consignment inventory obligation | 30,961 |
| | 24,022 |
|
Commodity contracts | 2,398 |
| | 11,569 |
|
Total other non-current liabilities | $ | 34,819 |
| | $ | 37,039 |
|
Accounts payable includes related parties balance of $273,144 and $290,785 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
| |
(c) | Deferred Income Tax Asset Valuation Allowance |
The following table displays the change in deferred income tax asset valuation allowance:
|
| | | |
| Deferred Income Tax Asset Valuation Allowance |
Valuation allowance at December 31, 2013 | $ | 134,251 |
|
Change in valuation allowance | 2,606 |
|
Valuation allowance at March 31, 2014 | $ | 136,857 |
|
ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
| |
(d) | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
The following table displays the change in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Cash Flow Hedges | | Total |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | $ | (29,982 | ) | | $ | (29,982 | ) |
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | 23,582 |
| | 23,582 |
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 8,275 |
| | 8,275 |
|
Net current-period other comprehensive income | 31,857 |
| | 31,857 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2014 | $ | 1,875 |
| | $ | 1,875 |
|
Debt consisted of the following:
|
| | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2014 | | December 31, 2013 |
Senior secured notes, net of discount | $ | 75,928 |
| | $ | 75,684 |
|
At March 31, 2014, the 13.50% senior secured notes ("Senior Secured Notes") due October 2014 had an outstanding balance of $75,928.
In May 2014, Alon Energy made a capital contribution allowing us to redeem $40,000 of the principal balance on our Senior Secured Notes, reducing the principal balance to approximately $36,500. In addition, Alon Energy owns $900 of our Senior Secured Notes after the date of this redemption.
| |
(10) | Related-Party Transactions |
We are a subsidiary of Alon Energy and we are operated as a component of the integrated operations of Alon Energy and its other subsidiaries. As such, the executive officers of Alon Energy, who are employed by another subsidiary of Alon Energy, also serve as our executive officers as well as Alon Energy’s other subsidiaries. Alon Energy performs general corporate and administrative services and functions for us and Alon Energy’s other subsidiaries, which include accounting, treasury, cash management, tax, information technology, insurance administration and claims processing, legal, environmental, risk management, audit, payroll and employee benefit processing, and internal audit services. Alon Energy allocates the expenses actually incurred in performing these services to us and to its other subsidiaries based primarily on the amount of time the individuals performing such services devote to our business and affairs relative to the amount of time they devote to the business and affairs of Alon Energy’s other subsidiaries. We record the amount of such allocations in our financial statements as selling, general and administrative expenses. Our share of Alon Energy’s selling, general and administrative expenses were $2,007 and $2,098 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Alon Energy currently owns all of our outstanding voting capital stock. As a result, Alon Energy can control the election of our directors, exercise control or significant influence over our corporate and management policies and generally determine the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matter submitted to our stockholders for approval, including potential mergers or acquisitions, asset sales and other significant corporate transactions. So long as Alon Energy continues to own a majority of the outstanding shares of our voting capital stock, Alon Energy will continue to be able to effectively control or influence the outcome of such matters.
| |
(11) | Commitments and Contingencies |
In the normal course of business, we have long-term commitments to purchase, at market prices, utilities such as natural gas, electricity and water for use by the refinery. We are also party to various refined product and crude oil supply and exchange agreements. These agreements are typically short-term in nature or provide terms for cancellation.
ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(unaudited, dollars in thousands except as noted)
We are involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
We are subject to loss contingencies pursuant to federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations govern the discharge of materials into the environment and may require us to incur future obligations to investigate the effects of the release or disposal of certain petroleum, chemical, and mineral substances at various sites; to remediate or restore these sites and to compensate others for damage to property and natural resources. These contingent obligations relate to sites that we own and are associated with past or present operations. We are currently participating in environmental investigations, assessments and cleanups pertaining to our refinery. We may be involved in additional future environmental investigations, assessments and cleanups. The magnitude of future costs are unknown and will depend on factors such as the nature and contamination at many sites, the timing, extent and method of the remedial actions which may be required, and the determination of our liability in proportion to other responsible parties.
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and that have no future economic benefit are expensed. Liabilities for expenditures of a non-capital nature are recorded when environmental assessment and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Substantially all amounts accrued are expected to be paid out over the next five years. The level of future expenditures for environmental remediation obligations cannot be determined with any degree of reliability.
We have accrued environmental remediation obligations recorded as a non-current liability of $262 and $271 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
Repayment of Senior Secured Notes
In May 2014, Alon Energy made a capital contribution allowing us to redeem $40,000 of the principal balance on our Senior Secured Notes due October 2014, reducing the principal balance to approximately $36,500. In addition, Alon Energy owns approximately $900 of our Senior Secured Notes after the date of this redemption.
| |
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations is abbreviated pursuant to General Instruction H(2)(a) of Form 10-Q. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying quarterly unaudited financial statements and our audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Our Annual Report includes additional information about our significant accounting policies, practices and transactions that underlie our financial results. For additional information, including information regarding outlook, liquidity, capital resources, contractual obligations, and critical accounting estimates, see the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of our parent, Alon USA Energy, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2014.
In this document, the words “the Company,” “we” and “our” refer to Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this report and other materials we file with the SEC, or in other written or oral statements made by us, other than statements of historical fact, are “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements relate to matters such as our industry, business strategy, goals and expectations concerning our market position, future operations, margins, profitability, capital expenditures, liquidity and capital resources and other financial and operating information. We have used the words “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “budget,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “will,” “future” and similar terms and phrases to identify forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements reflect our current expectations regarding future events, results or outcomes. These expectations may or may not be realized. Some of these expectations may be based upon assumptions or judgments that prove to be incorrect. In addition, our business and operations involve numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, which could result in our expectations not being realized or otherwise materially affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Actual events, results and outcomes may differ materially from our expectations due to a variety of factors. Although it is not possible to identify all of these factors, they include, among others, the following:
| |
• | changes in general economic conditions and capital markets; |
| |
• | changes in the underlying demand for our products; |
| |
• | the availability, costs and price volatility of crude oil, other refinery feedstocks and refined products; |
| |
• | changes in the spread between West Texas Intermediate ("WTI") Cushing crude oil and Light Louisiana Sweet ("LLS") crude oil; |
| |
• | changes in the spread between WTI Cushing crude oil and WTI Midland crude oil; |
| |
• | changes in the spread between Brent crude oil and WTI Cushing crude oil; |
| |
• | changes in the spread between Brent crude oil and LLS crude oil; |
| |
• | the effects of transactions involving forward contracts and derivative instruments; |
| |
• | actions of customers and competitors; |
| |
• | termination of our Supply and Offtake Agreement with J. Aron & Company (“J. Aron”), under which J. Aron is our largest supplier of crude oil and our largest customer of refined products. Additionally, we are obligated to repurchase all consigned inventories and certain other inventories upon termination of the Supply and Offtake Agreement; |
| |
• | changes in fuel and utility costs incurred by our facility; |
| |
• | disruptions due to equipment interruption, pipeline disruptions or failure at our or third-party facilities; |
| |
• | the execution of planned capital projects; |
| |
• | adverse changes in the credit ratings assigned to our trade credit and debt instruments; |
| |
• | the effects of and cost of compliance with the Renewable Fuel Standard 2 ("RFS2"), including the availability, cost and price volatility of Renewable Identification Numbers ("RINs"); |
| |
• | the effects of and cost of compliance with current and future state and federal environmental, economic, safety and other laws, policies and regulations; |
| |
• | operating hazards, natural disasters such as flooding, casualty losses and other matters beyond our control; |
| |
• | the effect of any national or international financial crisis on our business and financial condition; and |
| |
• | the other factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 under the caption “Risk Factors.” |
Any one of these factors or a combination of these factors could materially affect our future results of operations and could influence whether any forward-looking statements ultimately prove to be accurate. Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results and future performance may differ materially from those suggested in any forward-looking statements. We do not intend to update these statements unless we are required by the securities laws to do so.
Major Influences on Results of Operations
Our earnings and cash flows are primarily affected by the difference between refined product prices and the prices for crude oil and other feedstocks. These prices depend on numerous factors beyond our control, including the supply of, and demand for, crude oil, gasoline and other refined products which, in turn, depend on, among other factors, changes in domestic and foreign economies, weather conditions, domestic and foreign political affairs, production levels, the availability of imports, the marketing of competitive fuels and government regulation. While our sales and operating revenues fluctuate significantly with movements in crude oil and refined product prices, it is the spread between crude oil and refined product prices, and not necessarily fluctuations in those prices, that affect our earnings.
In order to measure our operating performance, we compare our per barrel refinery operating margins to certain industry benchmarks. We compare our refinery’s per barrel operating margin to the Gulf Coast 2/1/1 high sulfur diesel crack spread. A Gulf Coast 2/1/1 high sulfur diesel crack spread is calculated assuming that two barrels of LLS crude oil are converted into one barrel of Gulf Coast conventional gasoline and one barrel of Gulf Coast high sulfur diesel.
Our refinery has the capability to process substantial volumes of low-sulfur, or sweet, crude oils to produce a high percentage of light, high-value refined products. Sweet crude oil typically comprises 100% of our refinery’s crude oil input. This input is primarily comprised of LLS crude oil and WTI Midland priced crude oil.
In addition, we have been able to capitalize on the oversupply of West Texas crudes in Midland, the largest origination terminal for West Texas crude oil, resulting from increased production in the Permian Basin coupled with infrastructure constraints in Cushing, Oklahoma. Although West Texas crudes are typically transported to Cushing for sale, current logistical and infrastructure constraints at Cushing are limiting the ability of Permian Basin producers to transport their production to Cushing. The resulting oversupply of West Texas crudes at Midland has depressed Midland crude prices and enabled us to obtain an increased portion of our crude supply at discounted prices to Cushing. Moreover, by sourcing West Texas crude oils at Midland, we are able to eliminate the cost of transporting crude to and from Cushing. The WTI Cushing less WTI Midland spread represents the differential between the average per barrel price of WTI Cushing crude oil and the average per barrel price of WTI Midland crude oil. A widening of the WTI Cushing less WTI Midland spread can favorably influence the operating margin for our refinery.
Global product prices are influenced by the price of Brent crude which is a global benchmark crude. Global product prices set product prices in the U.S. As a result, our refinery is influenced by the spread between Brent crude and WTI Cushing. The Brent less WTI Cushing spread represents the differential between the average per barrel price of Brent crude oil and the average per barrel price of WTI Cushing crude oil. A widening of the spread between Brent and WTI Cushing can favorably influence our refinery operating margin.
Our refinery is also influenced by the spread between Brent crude and LLS. The Brent less LLS spread represents the differential between the average per barrel price of Brent crude oil and the average per barrel price of LLS crude oil. A widening of the spread between Brent and LLS can favorably influence our refinery operating margin.
Our results of operations are also significantly affected by our refinery’s operating costs, particularly the cost of natural gas used for fuel and the cost of electricity. Natural gas prices have historically been volatile. Typically, electricity prices fluctuate with natural gas prices.
Safety, reliability and the environmental performance of our refinery are critical to our financial performance. The financial impact of planned downtime, such as a turnaround or major maintenance project, is mitigated through a diligent planning process that considers expectations for product availability, margin environment and the availability of resources to perform the required maintenance.
Factors Affecting Comparability
Our financial condition and operating results over the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, have been influenced by the following factors which are fundamental to understanding comparisons of our period-to-period financial performance.
Maintenance and Reduced Crude Oil Throughput
During the three months ended March 31, 2014, our refinery was shut down for crude unit maintenance which was the primary reason refinery utilization was 80.7%.
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, our refinery was shut down for crude unit maintenance and reformer catalyst regeneration which resulted in refinery utilization of 80.5%.
Certain Derivative Impacts
Included in the statements of operations in cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2014, are total losses on commodity swaps of $6.2 million.
Renewable Fuels Standard 2
We are subject to the RFS2 requirement to blend biofuels in the products we produce and to the degree we are unable to blend at the required percentage, a RINs deficit is created and we must acquire that number of RINs by the annual reporting deadline in order to remain in compliance with applicable regulations. Our refinery had RINs costs of $5.1 million for the first quarter of 2014. Our refinery received an exemption from the RFS2 requirements for 2013 and as a result did not record costs associated with RINs.
ALON REFINING KROTZ SPRINGS, INC.
Summary Financial Tables. The following tables provide summary financial data and selected key operating statistics for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. The following data should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. All information in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” is unaudited.
|
| | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
| (dollars in thousands, except per barrel data and pricing statistics) |
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA: | | | |
Net sales | $ | 636,031 |
| | $ | 620,281 |
|
Operating costs and expenses: | | | |
Cost of sales | 601,003 |
| | 551,180 |
|
Direct operating expenses | 25,484 |
| | 23,267 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 2,007 |
| | 2,098 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 6,799 |
| | 6,026 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses | 635,293 |
| | 582,571 |
|
Operating income | 738 |
| | 37,710 |
|
Interest expense | (7,824 | ) | | (10,196 | ) |
Other income, net | 6 |
| | 7 |
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense | (7,080 | ) | | 27,521 |
|
Income tax expense | — |
| | — |
|
Net income (loss) | $ | (7,080 | ) | | $ | 27,521 |
|
KEY OPERATING STATISTICS: | | | |
Per barrel of throughput: | | | |
Refinery operating margin (1) | $ | 7.39 |
| | $ | 13.14 |
|
Refinery direct operating expense (2) | 4.56 |
| | 4.42 |
|
OTHER DATA: | | | |
Capital expenditures | $ | 1,997 |
| | $ | 2,262 |
|
Capital expenditures for turnaround and catalyst | 375 |
| | 2,427 |
|
PRICING STATISTICS: | | | |
Crack spreads (2/1/1) (per barrel): | | | |
Gulf Coast high sulfur diesel | $ | 10.75 |
| | $ | 8.20 |
|
WTI Cushing crude oil (per barrel) | $ | 98.65 |
| | $ | 94.27 |
|
Crude oil differentials (per barrel): | | | |
WTI Cushing less WTI Midland | $ | 3.54 |
| | $ | 7.72 |
|
LLS less WTI Cushing | 6.00 |
| | 20.22 |
|
Brent less LLS | 4.80 |
| | (0.33 | ) |
Brent less WTI Cushing | 10.46 |
| | 19.25 |
|
Product price (dollars per gallon): | | | |
Gulf Coast unleaded gasoline | $ | 2.66 |
| | $ | 2.84 |
|
Gulf Coast high sulfur diesel | 2.84 |
| | 3.01 |
|
Natural gas (per MMBtu) | 4.72 |
| | 3.48 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
THROUGHPUT AND PRODUCTION DATA: | For the Three Months Ended |
March 31, |
| 2014 | | 2013 |
| bpd | | % | | bpd | | % |
Refinery throughput: | | | | | | | |
WTI Crude | 24,040 |
| | 38.7 |
| | 25,083 |
| | 43.0 |
|
Gulf Coast sweet crude | 35,710 |
| | 57.6 |
| | 31,516 |
| | 53.9 |
|
Blendstocks | 2,317 |
| | 3.7 |
| | 1,840 |
| | 3.1 |
|
Total refinery throughput (3) | 62,067 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 58,439 |
| | 100.0 |
|
Refinery production: | | | | | | | |
Gasoline | 30,888 |
| | 48.9 |
| | 26,916 |
| | 45.0 |
|
Diesel/jet | 25,873 |
| | 41.0 |
| | 22,382 |
| | 37.5 |
|
Heavy Oils | 594 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 1,773 |
| | 3.0 |
|
Other | 5,819 |
| | 9.2 |
| | 8,687 |
| | 14.5 |
|
Total refinery production (4) | 63,174 |
| | 100.0 |
| | 59,758 |
| | 100.0 |
|
Refinery utilization (5) | | | 80.7 | % | | | | 80.5 | % |
| |
(1) | Refinery operating margin is a per barrel measurement calculated by dividing the margin between net sales and cost of sales by the refinery’s throughput volumes. Industry-wide refining results are driven and measured by the margins between refined product prices and the prices for crude oil, which are referred to as crack spreads. We compare our refinery operating margin to these crack spreads to assess our operating performance relative to other participants in our industry. |
The refinery operating margin for the three months ended March 31, 2014 excludes losses on commodity swaps of $6,238.
| |
(2) | Refinery direct operating expense is a per barrel measurement calculated by dividing direct operating expenses at the refinery by the refinery’s total throughput volume. |
| |
(3) | Total refinery throughput represents the total barrels per day of crude oil and blendstock inputs in the refinery production process. |
| |
(4) | Total refinery production represents the barrels per day of various products produced from processing crude and other refinery feedstocks through the crude unit and other conversion units at the refinery. |
| |
(5) | Refinery utilization represents average daily crude oil throughput divided by crude oil capacity, excluding planned periods of downtime for maintenance and turnarounds. |
Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
Net Sales. Net sales for the three months ended March 31, 2014 were $636.0 million, compared to $620.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, an increase of $15.7 million. This increase was due to higher refinery throughput, partially offset by lower refined product prices in the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to the same period last year. Refinery average throughput for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was 62,067 barrels per day, which reflects the impact of crude unit maintenance, compared to 58,439 barrels per day for the three months ended March 31, 2013, which reflects the impact of crude unit maintenance and reformer catalyst regeneration. The average per gallon price of Gulf Coast gasoline for the three months ended March 31, 2014 decreased $0.18, or 6.3%, to $2.66, compared to $2.84 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The average per gallon price for Gulf Coast high sulfur diesel for the three months ended March 31, 2014 decreased $0.17, or 5.6%, to $2.84, compared to $3.01 for the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Cost of Sales. Cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2014 were $601.0 million, compared to $551.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, an increase of $49.8 million. This increase was primarily due to increased refinery throughput, higher crude oil prices, a narrowing WTI Cushing to WTI Midland spread as well as the impact of commodity swaps. The average price per barrel of WTI Cushing for the three months ended March 31, 2014 increased $4.38 per barrel, or 4.6%, to an average of $98.65 per barrel compared to an average of $94.27 per barrel for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The WTI Cushing to WTI Midland spread narrowed 54.1% to $3.54 per barrel for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to $7.72 per barrel for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was also impacted by $5.1 million of costs to purchase RINs needed to satisfy our obligation to blend biofuels into the products we produce.
Direct Operating Expenses. Direct operating expenses were $25.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to $23.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, an increase of $2.2 million, or 9.4%. This increase was primarily due to higher natural gas costs and higher major maintenance costs.
Operating Income. Operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $0.7 million, compared to $37.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, a decrease of $37.0 million. This decrease was primarily due to reduced refinery margins, partially offset by increased refinery throughput.
The refinery operating margin was $7.39 per barrel for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to $13.14 per barrel for the same period last year. This decrease was primarily due to narrowing of both the LLS to WTI Cushing spread and the WTI Cushing to WTI Midland spread as well as the impact of RINs costs, partially offset by higher Gulf Coast 2/1/1 high sulfur diesel crack spreads during the three months ended March 31, 2014. The LLS to WTI Cushing spread narrowed $14.22 per barrel to $6.00 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to $20.22 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, our refinery was also impacted by $5.1 million of costs to purchase RINs needed to satisfy our obligation to blend biofuels into the products we produce. Our refinery received an exemption from the RFS2 requirements for 2013 and as a result, we did not record costs associated with RINs. The average Gulf Coast 2/1/1 high sulfur diesel crack spread for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $10.75 per barrel, compared to $8.20 per barrel for the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Interest Expense. Interest expense was $7.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to $10.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, a decrease of $2.4 million, or 23.5%. This decrease was primarily due to lower interest costs on the reduced balance of our outstanding debt obligations.
Net Income (Loss). Net loss was $7.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, compared to net income of $27.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, a decrease of $34.6 million. This decrease was attributable to the factors discussed above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash generated from our operating activities, inventory supply and offtake arrangements, credit lines and additional funding from Alon Energy. Accounts payable to Alon Energy and its subsidiaries of $273.1 million at March 31, 2014, while due on demand, are expected to be paid as funds are available.
We have an agreement with J. Aron for the supply of crude oil that supports the operations of our refinery, which substantially reduces our physical inventories and our associated need to issue letters of credit to support crude oil purchases. In addition, the structure allows us to acquire crude oil without the constraints of a maximum facility size during periods of high crude oil prices.
Future operating results will depend on market factors, primarily the difference between the prices we receive from customers for produced products compared to the prices we pay to suppliers for crude oil. We plan to continue to operate the refinery at current or higher utilization rates as long as the refinery is able to generate cash operating margin. Management believes its current liquidity from the above described sources is adequate to operate the refinery.
We have senior secured notes due October 2014 with an outstanding balance (net of unamortized discount) of $75.9 million at March 31, 2014. In May 2014, Alon Energy made a capital contribution allowing us to redeem $40.0 million of the principal balance on our senior secured notes. We plan to repay the remaining principal balance of approximately $36.5 million using cash from operating activities and funding from Alon Energy. As an alternative, we would consider the issuance of new debt to allow for the repayment of the outstanding senior secured notes balance.
New Accounting Standards and Disclosures
New accounting standards, if any, are disclosed in Note (1) Basis of Presentation included in the financial statements included in Item 1 of this report.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Omitted under the reduced disclosure format permitted by General Instruction H(2)(c) of Form 10-Q.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
| |
(1) | Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. |
Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our principal executive and principal financial officers, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report, and has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms including, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
| |
(2) | Changes in internal control over financial reporting. |
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as described in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
| | |
Exhibit | | |
Number | | Description of Exhibit |
31.1 | | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 | | Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 | | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101 | | The following financial information from Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Balance Sheets, (ii) Statements of Operations, (iii) Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Statements of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Financial Statements. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| | Alon Refining Krotz Springs, Inc. |
Date: | May 14, 2014 | By: | /s/ David Wiessman |
| | | David Wiessman |
| | | Executive Chairman |
| | | |
| | | |
Date: | May 14, 2014 | By: | /s/ Paul Eisman |
| | | Paul Eisman |
| | | Chief Executive Officer |
| | | |
| | | |
Date: | May 14, 2014 | By: | /s/ Shai Even |
| | | Shai Even |
| | | Chief Financial Officer |