DMH International (DMHI) 10-K 13 Apr 15 2014 FY Annual report Financial data

Document_And_Entity_Informatio

Document And Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Apr. 13, 2015	Jun. 30, 2014
Document And Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Document Type	10-K
Current Fiscal Year End Date	-19
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		415,961,936
Entity Public Float			$1,208,560
Amendment Flag	FALSE
Entity Central Index Key	1496819
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Document Period End Date	31-Dec-14
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2014
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Entity Trading Symbol	dmhi

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
ASSETS
Cash	$984
Total Assets	984	0
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	266,806	224,018
Accounts payable - related party	281,522	221,522
Due to related parties	529,604	532,739
Convertible debt-net of discount of $27,200 and $0, respectively	290,362	0
Derivative liability	114,649	0
Total Liabilities	1,482,943	978,279
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Preferred stock Authorized: 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per share; Issued and outstanding: nil preferred shares	0	0
Common stock Authorized: 450,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share Issued and outstanding: 351,999,486 and 271,500,000 common shares at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.	352,000	271,500
Preferred stock issuable	1,600,000	0
Common stock issuable	35,000	0
Additional paid-in capital	1,380,309	870,852
Deficit accumulated	-4,849,268	-2,120,631
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	-1,481,959	-978,279
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	$984	$0

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets_Pa

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
Preferred Shares Authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred Shares Par Value	$0.00	$0.00
Preferred Shares Issued	0	0
Preferred Shares Outstanding	0	0
Common Stock Authorized	450,000,000	450,000,000
Common Stock Par Value	$0.00	$0.00
Common Stock Issued	351,999,486	271,500,000
Common Stock Outstanding	351,999,486	271,500,000

Consolidated_Statements_of_Ope

Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Income Statement [Abstract]
Revenues
Operating Expenses
General and administrative	34,164	36,487
Management fees	60,000	60,000
Professional fees	691,651	947,857
Research and development	87,698
Impairment of goodwill	1,610,353
Total Operating Expenses	2,483,864	1,044,344
Other Expenses
Interest expense	191,202
Change in fair value of derivatives	4,506
Gain on settlement of debt	-10,226
Imputed interest	59,291	57,234
Total Other Expenses	244,773	57,234
Net Loss	($2,728,637)	($1,101,578)
Net Loss per Share - Basic and Diluted	($0.01)	($0.01)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding - Basic and Diluted	301,299,705	212,468,493

Consolidated_Statement_of_Stoc

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) (USD $)	Common Stock	Additional Paid-in Capital	Preferred Stock Issuable	Common Stock Issuable	Deficit Accumulated	Total
Beginning Balance at Dec. 31, 2012	$161,000	($85,532)			($1,019,053)	($943,585)
Beginning Balance (in Shares) at Dec. 31, 2012	161,000,000
Imputed Interest		57,234				57,234
Common stock issued in a private placement	39,500	315,500				355,000
Common stock issued in a private placement (in Shares)	39,500,000
Common stock issued for services	71,000	583,650				654,650
Common stock issued for services (in Shares)	71,000,000					654,650
Settlement of derivative liability due to conversions
Net loss for the period					-1,101,578	-1,101,578
Ending Balance at Dec. 31, 2013	271,500	870,852			-2,120,631	-978,279
Ending Balance (in Shares) at Dec. 31, 2013	271,500,000
Imputed Interest		59,291				59,291
Common stock issued in a private placement	12,000	73,000				85,000
Common stock issued in a private placement (in Shares)	12,000,000
Common stock issued for services	26,500	258,500		35,000		320,000
Common stock issued for services (in Shares)	26,500,000					320,000
Common stock issued for debt conversions	42,000	20,212				62,212
Common stock issued for debt conversions(in Shares)	41,999,486
Settlement of derivative liability due to conversions		98,454				98,454
Preferred stock issuable			1,600,000			1,600,000
Net loss for the period					-2,728,637	-2,728,637
Ending Balance at Dec. 31, 2014	$352,000	$1,380,309	$1,600,000	$35,000	($4,849,268)	($1,481,959)
Ending Balance (in Shares) at Dec. 31, 2014	351,999,486

Consolidated_Statements_of_Cas

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Statement of Cash Flows [Abstract]
Net loss for the period	($2,728,637)	($1,101,578)
Imputed interest	59,291	57,234
Amortization of debt discount	181,397
Change in fair value of derivatives	4,506
Impairment of goodwill	1,610,353
Gain on settlement of convertible debt	-10,226
Stock issued for services	320,000	654,650
Accounts Payable - Related Party	60,000	60,000
Accounts payable and Accrued liabilities	42,788	59,134
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	-460,528	-270,560
Investing Activities
Cash acquired in merger	11,947
Advance paid in connection with merger	-20,000
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities	-8,053
Due to related parties - borrowings	58,865	37,500
Due to related parties - repayments	-64,300	-122,004
Proceeds from loan	390,000
Proceeds from common stock subscribed	85,000	355,000
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities	469,565	270,496
Increase (decrease) in Cash	984	-64
Cash - Beginning of Period		64
Cash - End of Period	984
Non-cash financing activities:
Common stocks issued for debt conversions	72,438
Settlement of derivative liability due to conversions	98,454
Recognition of derivative liability	$208,597

Description_of_Business_and_Re

Description of Business and Reverse Acquisition	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Disclosure Text Block [Abstract]
Description of Business and Reverse Acquisition	1.   Description of Business and Reverse Acquisition
	Description of Business
	DMH International, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Florida on March 26, 2010.
	Going Concern
	These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. During the years ended December 31, 2014, the Company has a working capital deficit of $1,481,959 and accumulated deficit of $4,849,268. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its management, and its ability to identify future investment opportunities and obtain the necessary debt or equity financing, and generating profitable operations from the Company’s future operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
	Reverse Acquisition
	On December 11, 2012, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with DMH International, Inc. (“DMHI”), a public shell company. Pursuant to the agreement, DMHI acquired all of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company (100 common shares) by issuing 125,000,000 common shares, comprised of 100,000,000 common shares from the President and Director of the Company and 25,000,000 newly issued common shares.  Furthermore, the President and Director of DMHI cancelled 100,000,000 common shares as part of the share exchange agreement.  As a result of the share exchange, the former shareholders of the Company controlled approximately 78% of the issued and outstanding common shares of DMHI resulting in a change in control.  The transaction was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization transaction, as DMHI qualifies as a non-operating public shell company given the fact that the Company held nominal net monetary assets, consisting of only cash at the time of merger transaction.  As Touch Medical Solutions, Inc. is deemed to be the purchaser for accounting purposes under recapitalization accounting, the equity of the Company is presented as the equity of the combined company and the capital stock account of the Company is adjusted to reflect the part value of the outstanding and issued common stock of the legal acquirer (DMHI) after giving effect to the number of shares issued in the share exchange agreement. Shares retained by DMHI are reflected as an issuance as of the acquisition date for the historical amount of the net assets of the acquired entity, which in this case is zero.
	Merger
	Effective July 22, 2014, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Virtual Physician's Network through issuance of 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s convertible preferred stock. Each share of our preferred stock is convertible into 20 shares of our common stock. Virtual Physician's Network was merged into the Company and became the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary. As of December 31, 2014, these shares have not been issued due to administrative delay. The 10,000,000 shares of convertible preferred stocks were accrued in preferred stocks issuable with a fair value of $1,600,000. Each share of convertible preferred stock was valued at 20 times of closing price of common stock price of $0.008 on the date of merger.

Summary_of_Significant_Account

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	2.   Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
	Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
	The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) and are expressed in U.S. dollars. All the intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.
	Use of Estimates
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and valuation of long-lived assets, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.
	Cash and cash equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.  As at December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had no cash equivalents.
	Property and Equipment
	Property and equipment is comprised of computer equipment and is recorded at cost.  The Company amortizes the cost of equipment on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of three years. The Company reviews all property and equipment for impairment annually.
	Goodwill
	The Company evaluates the carrying value of goodwill during the fourth quarter of each year and between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to (1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (2) unanticipated competition, or (3) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. When evaluating whether goodwill is impaired, the Company compares the fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit's carrying amount, including goodwill. The fair value of the reporting unit is estimated using a combination of the income, or discounted cash flows, approach and the market approach, which utilizes comparable companies' data. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the amount of the impairment loss must be measured. The impairment loss would be calculated by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill to its carrying amount. In calculating the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the other assets and liabilities of that unit based on their fair values. The excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amount assigned to its other assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The Company's evaluation of goodwill completed during the 2014 year end resulted in an impairment loss of $1,610,353.
	Revenue Recognition
	Revenue will be recognized only when the price is fixed and determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service has been provided, and collectability is assured.  The Company is not exposed to any credit risks as amounts are prepaid prior to performance of services.
	Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share
	The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company has 262,244,458 and 0 shares convertible under note agreement that are anti-dilutive and not included in diluted loss per share.
	Financial Instruments
	The Company adopted the FASB standard related to fair value measurement at inception. The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. The standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and, accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements. The standard clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The recorded values of long-term debt approximate their fair values, as interest approximates market rates. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the standard established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows.
	Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
	Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
	Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
	The Company’s financial instruments are cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and amounts due to related parties. The recorded values of cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and amounts due to related parties approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature.
	The following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured and recognized at fair value as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 on a recurring basis:
			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014
	Description		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
	Derivative Liability	$	-	$	-	$	114,649	$	-
	Totals	$	-	$	-	$	114,649	$	-
			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013
	Description		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
	Derivative Liability	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
	Totals	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
	Income Taxes
	Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted ASC 740 “Accounting for Income Taxes” as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC 740, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in this financial statement because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.
	Recent Accounting Pronouncements
	On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-16—Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update do not change the current criteria in GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. That is, an entity will continue to evaluate whether the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria. The amendments clarify how current GAAP should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. The effects of initially adopting the amendments in this Update should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods.
	On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-17—Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).  The amendments in this Update provide an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. The amendments in this Update are effective on November 18, 2014. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event. However, if the financial statements for the period in which the most recent change-in-control event occurred already have been issued or made available to be issued, the application of this guidance would be a change in accounting principle.
	On August 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concerns (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.
	In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities”. The amendments in this update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the ASC thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP.  In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. The amendments in this update are applied retrospectively. The early adoption of ASU 2014-10 removed the development stage entity financial reporting requirements from the Company.
	In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In July 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." The provisions of ASU No. 2013-11 require an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion thereof, in the statement of financial position as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions related to availability. ASU No. 2013-11 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
	In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:
	·
	Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and
	·
	Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.
	The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Related_Party_Transactions

Related Party Transactions	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]
Related Party Transactions	3.   Related Party Transactions
	As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company owes $89,216 to the CFO of the Company. The amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand. Imputed interest at 8% has been expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital of $7,137 and $7,555 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, $180,000 and $120,000 included in accounts payable is the management fees owed to CFO, respectively. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, $101,522 included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities is owed to a company formerly controlled by the CFO of the Company. These amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand. Imputed interest at 8% has been expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital of $19,533 and $14,694 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
	As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company owes $438,088 and $443,523, respectively to the CEO and companies controlled by him. The amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand. The amount owing has an imputed interest at 8%.  Imputed interest at 8% has been expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital of $32,621 and $26,193 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
	As of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company owes $2,300 and $0, respectively to a company controlled by a shareholder of the Company.

Convertible_Notes

Convertible Notes	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
Convertible Notes	4.   Convertible Notes
	On March 3, 2014, the Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount of $40,000. The proceeds were received on March 7, 2014. The Note carries interest at 9% annum and matures on March 3, 2015. The Note holder is entitled to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of 58% the average two lowest closing bid price in the 20 trading days prior to the conversion date. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the debt holder made four conversions of a total of 22,106,486 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $40,000 of the note with a fair value of $89,441, included in the fair value of debt balance of $89,441 was settlement of derivative liability of $49,441. The Company recorded a loss of $2,324 for additional shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 6).
	On March 31, 2014, the Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount of $50,000. The proceeds were received on April 2, 2014. The Note carries interest at 9% annum and matures on March 31, 2015. The Note holder is entitled to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of 55% the average two lowest closing bid price in the 20 trading days prior to the conversion date. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the debt holder made four conversions of a total of 19,893,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $32,438 of the note with a fair value of $81,451, included in the fair value of debt balance of $81,451 was settlement of derivative liability of $49,013.The Company recorded a gain of $12,550 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 6).
	On May 5, 2014, the Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount of $50,000. The proceeds were received on May 7, 2014. The Note carries interest at 9% annum and matures on March 31, 2015. The Note holder is entitled to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of 55% the average two lowest closing bid price in the 20 trading days prior to the conversion date.
	On July 25, 2014, the Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount of $250,000. $125,000 each of the proceeds was received on June 25, 2014 and July 25, 2014, respectively (Total $250,000). The Note carries interest at 8% annum and matured on January 25, 2015. The Note holder is entitled to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of the lower of $0.01 or 60% the average three lowest VWAP prices in the 15 trading days prior to the conversion date. The Holder shall not be entitled to convert the Note in connection with that number of shares of Common Stock which would be in excess of the sum of (i) the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the Holder and its affiliates on a Conversion Date, and (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of the Note would result in beneficial ownership by the Holder and its affiliates of more than 4.99% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Borrower on such Conversion Date. Also, the aggregate conversion by the Holder may not exceed 9.99% if a form 13d or equivalent is filed. As described above, the note matured on January 25, 2015 but was satisfied in full with 25,000,000 shares of common stocks per settlement agreement on January 28, 2015 (See Note 9).
	In the evaluation of the financing arrangements, the Company concluded that the conversion features did not meet the conditions set forth in current accounting standards for equity classification. Since equity classification is not available for the conversion feature, it requires bifurcation and liability classification, at fair value. The Company elected to account for the hybrid contract under the guidance of ASC 815-15-25-4. The fair values of the Company’s derivative liabilities were estimated at the issuance date and are revalued at each subsequent reporting date, using a binomial option pricing model. In connection with the issuance of these convertible notes payable, the Company encountered a day-one derivative loss of $41,902 related to the recognition of (i) the hybrid note and (ii) the derivative instrument arising from the fair value measurement due to the fair value of the hybrid note and embedded derivative exceeding the proceeds that the Company received from the arrangement. Therefore, the Company was required to record a loss on the derivative financial instrument. In addition, the fair value will change in future periods, based upon changes in the Company’s common stock price and changes in other assumptions and market indicators used in the valuation techniques. These future changes will be recognized in changes in fair value of derivatives on the Company’s statement of operations.  At December 31, 2014, these convertible note payable, at fair value, were recorded at $114,649 (See Note 5). Accordingly, the company recognized gain of $4,506 in changes in fair value of derivative on the Company’s statement of operations at December 31, 2014
	In addition, the proceeds of $208,597 received as a result of the issuance of these convertible notes is attributable to the value of the call option embedded in the note, which was recorded as a debt discount and will be amortized over the term of the note under the interest method. Amortization for the year ended December 31, 2014 is $181,397.

Derivative_Liabilities

Derivative Liabilities	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]
Derivative Liabilities	5.   Derivative Liabilities
	As discussed in Note 4 under Convertible Notes, the Company issued convertible notes payable that provide for the issuance of convertible notes with variable conversion provisions. The number of shares of common stock to be issued is based on the future price of the Company’s common stock. The number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the note is indeterminate. Pursuant to ASC 815-15 Embedded Derivatives, the fair values of the variable conversion shares to be issued were recorded as derivative liabilities on the issuance date. The fair values of the Company’s derivative liabilities were estimated at the issuance date and are revalued at each subsequent reporting date, using a binomial option pricing model. The changes in fair value of derivatives for $4,506 on the Company’s statement of operations consisted of a loss of $41,902 due to the value in excess of the face value of the convertible notes and a gain of $37,396 attributable to market value of the convertible notes.
	The following is a summary of changes in the fair market value of the derivative liability during the years ended December 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively:
			Derivative
			Liability
			Convertible
			Debts Total
	Balance, December 31, 2013	$	-
	Increase in derivative value due to issuances of convertible promissory notes		208,597
	Decrease in derivative value due to issuances of common stocks for conversions		-98,454
	Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities due to the mark to market adjustment		4,506
	Balance, December 31, 2014	$	114,649

Common_Shares

Common Shares	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Stockholders' Equity Note [Abstract]
Common shares	6.   Common shares
	Convertible preferred stock issued for merger
	On July 22, 2014, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Virtual Physician's Network through issuance of 10,000,000 shares of convertible preferred stock. Each share of convertible preferred stock is convertible into 20 shares of the Company’s common stock. Upon the occurrence of a mandatory conversion event, which occurs immediately following the business day on which the Corporation’s shareholders have approved an amendment to the Corporation’s Articles of Incorporation which provide for a sufficient number of authorized common stock which will permit the holders of the convertible preferred stock to convert such shares into the Company’s Common Stock, the outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock shall automatically be converted at a conversion rate of 20 shares of Common Stock for every 1 share of convertible preferred stock. As of December 31, 2014, these shares have not been issued due to administrative delay. They were valued at $1,600,000, which is 20 times of closing price of common stock price of $0.008 on the date of merger. As of December 31, 2014, these shares have not been issued due to administrative delay. The 10,000,000 shares of convertible preferred stocks were accrued in preferred stocks issuable with a fair value of $1,600,000.
	Common stock issued for reverse merger
	On December 11, 2012, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Agreement”) with DMH International Inc. (“DMHI”), a Nevada company.  Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company issued 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Touch Medical Solutions, Inc. (“TMSI”) in exchange for 125,000,000 common shares, comprised of 100,000,000 common shares from the President and Director of DMHI and 25,000,000 newly issued common shares.  In addition, the President and Director of DMHI returned and cancelled 100,000,000 common shares.  The Agreement results in management and shareholders of TMSI to hold 78% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company, resulting in a reverse recapitalization transaction (See Note 1). Following the above events, there were 161,000,000 shares outstanding, including:
	Shares	Held By:
	125,000,000	TMSI Shareholders
	36,000,000	Existing DMHI Shareholders
	Common stock issued in a private placement
	During January, 2014, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a subscriber at a price per share of $0.01 for total proceeds of $50,000.
	During March, 2014, the Company granted 7,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a subscriber at a price per share of $0.005 for total proceeds of $35,000. These shares were accrued in common stock issuable at March 31, 2014 as the shares were not issued until April 2014.
	During April, 2014, the Company issued 7,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a subscriber at a price per share of $0.005 for total proceeds of $35,000.
	During May, 2013, the Company issued 31,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a subscriber at a price per share of $0.01 for total proceeds of $315,000.
	During November, 2013, the Company issued 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to three subscribers at a price per share of $0.005 for total proceeds of $40,000.
	Common stock issued for services
	During August, 2014, the Company issued a total of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to two consultants for consulting services rendered. The shares were valued at $0.007 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $35,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.
	During September, 2014, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to a consultant for consulting services for a term of one year. The shares were valued at $0.006 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $60,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.
	During February, 2014, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to a consultant for consulting services for a term of one year. The shares were valued at $0.02 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $100,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.
	During February, 2014, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to a consultant for consulting services for a term of one year. The shares were valued at $0.015 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $75,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.
	During March, 2014, the Company granted a total of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to a consultant for consulting services for a term from six months. The 1,500,000 shares were issued, and the remaining 3,500,000 shares will be issued in connection with the agreement following the filing of a new S-8 Stock Plan. The 3,500,000 shares were accrued in common stocks issuable with a fair value of $35,000. The shares were valued at $0.01 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $50,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.
	During April, 2013, the Company issued 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to a consultant for marketing services for nine months. The shares were valued at $0.0129 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $193,500 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.
	During April, 2013, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to a consultant for investor relations services for a year. The shares were valued at $0.0129 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $64,500 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.
	During June, 2013, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to a consultant for investor relations services for six months. The shares were valued at $0.0065 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $6,500 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.
	During July, 2013, the Company issued a total of 23,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to four consultants for investor relations and consulting services for a term from six months to one year. The shares were valued at $0.0047 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $108,100 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.
	During October, 2013, the Company issued a total of 19,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to officers and employees for services. The shares were valued at $0.0091 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $172,900 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.
	During October, 2013, the Company issued a total of 4,500,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to six consultants for consulting services that have been rendered. The shares were valued at $0.0091 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $40,950 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.
	During November, 2013, the Company issued a total of 3,500,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common   stock to six consultants for investor relations and consulting services for a term from six months to one year. The shares were valued in the range from $0.012 to $0.024 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $68,200 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.
	Common Stock Issued for Debt Conversions
	During September through December, 2014, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $40,000 on March 3, 2014, the debt holder made the following conversions of a total of 22,106,486 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $40,000 of the note with a fair value of $89,441, included in the fair value of $89,441 was settlement of derivative liability of $49,441. The Company recorded a loss of $2,324 for additional shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 4).
	Date		Number of		Fair Value of
			shares converted		Debt Converted
	9/15/14		6,708,698	$	30,634
	9/22/14		6,719,753	$	29,523
	10/7/14		2,904,864	$	15,155
	12/4/14		5,773,171	$	14,129
	During October through December, 2014, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $50,000 on March 31, 2014, the debt holder made the following conversions of a total of 19,893,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $32,438 of the note with a fair value of $81,451, included in the fair value of $81,451 was settlement of derivative liability of $49,013. The Company recorded a gain of $12,550 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 4).
	Date		Number of		Fair Value of
			shares converted		Debt Converted
	10/20/14		1,724,137	$	13,334
	10/30/14		1,785,714	$	13,596
	11/10/14		1,851,851	$	12,573
	12/15/14		14,531,298	$	41,948

Merger

Merger	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Business Combinations [Abstract]
Merger	7.   Merger
	On July 22, 2014, we completed the Merger Agreement with Virtual Physician's Network. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Virtual Physician's Network through issuance of 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s convertible preferred stock. Each of preferred stock is convertible into 20 shares of our common stock. Virtual Physician's Network was merged into the Company and became the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary. As of December 31, 2014, these shares have not been issued due to administrative delay. The 10,000,000 shares of convertible preferred stocks were accrued in preferred stocks issuable with a fair value of $1,600,000. Each share of convertible preferred stock was valued at 20 times of closing price of common stock price of $0.008 on the date of merger.
	This acquisition was accounted for as a business combination under the purchase method of accounting, given that substantially all of the Company’s assets and ongoing operations were acquired. The purchase resulted in $1,610,353 of goodwill. According to the purchase method of accounting, the Company recognized the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:
			22-Jul-14
	Consideration:
	Preferred convertible stock issued	$	1,600,000
	Cash paid prior to closing		20,000
	Total consideration given		1,620,000
	Fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
	Cash	$	11,947
	Due to a related party		-2,300
	Total fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed		9,647
	Consideration paid in excess of fair value (Goodwill)(1)		1,610,353
	Impairment of goodwill at 12/31/2014		-1,610,353
	Fair value of goodwill at 12/31/2014		-
	(1)   The consideration paid in excess of the net fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been recognized as goodwill.
	Management believes the product line of Virtual Physician's Network acquired will enable the Company to enhance their business model and strengthen its future cash flows to fund operations and take advantage of additional growth opportunities. The Company's evaluation of goodwill completed during the year end resulted in an impairment loss of $1,610,353.

Income_Taxes

Income Taxes	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Income Taxes	8. Income Taxes
	The Company has $1,945,966 of net operating losses ($1,382,650 in 2013) carried forward to offset taxable income in future years which expire commencing in fiscal 2034.  The income tax benefit differs from the amount computed by applying the US federal income tax rate of 34% to net loss before income taxes. As at December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had no uncertain tax positions.
		December 31,	December 31,
		2014	2013
		$	$
	Net loss carry forward	-1,945,966	-1,382,650
	Statutory rate	34%	34%
	Computed expected tax recovery	661,628	470,101
	Valuation allowance	-661,628	-470,101
	Income tax provision	–	–

Subsequent_Events

Subsequent Events	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Subsequent Events [Abstract]
Subsequent Events	9.   Subsequent Events
	On January 28, 2015, the Company issued a total of 25,000,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock to settle the convertible notes of $250,000 originated on July 25, 2014 (See Note 4).
	During February through March, 2014, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $50,000 on March 31, 2014, the debt holder made the conversions of a total of 19,962,450 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying the remaining amount of the $19,961 of the note in full.
	During April, 2014, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $50,000 on May 5, 2014, the debt holder made the conversions of a total of 19,000,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $19,000 of the note.

Summary_of_Significant_Account1

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation	Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
	The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) and are expressed in U.S. dollars. All the intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.
Use of Estimates	Use of Estimates
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and valuation of long-lived assets, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.
Cash and cash equivalents	Cash and cash equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.  As at December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had no cash equivalents.
Property and Equipment	Property and Equipment
	Property and equipment is comprised of computer equipment and is recorded at cost.  The Company amortizes the cost of equipment on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of three years. The Company reviews all property and equipment for impairment annually.
Goodwill	Goodwill
	The Company evaluates the carrying value of goodwill during the fourth quarter of each year and between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to (1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (2) unanticipated competition, or (3) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. When evaluating whether goodwill is impaired, the Company compares the fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit's carrying amount, including goodwill. The fair value of the reporting unit is estimated using a combination of the income, or discounted cash flows, approach and the market approach, which utilizes comparable companies' data. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the amount of the impairment loss must be measured. The impairment loss would be calculated by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill to its carrying amount. In calculating the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the other assets and liabilities of that unit based on their fair values. The excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amount assigned to its other assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The Company's evaluation of goodwill completed during the 2014 year end resulted in an impairment loss of $1,610,353.
Revenue Recognition	Revenue Recognition
	Revenue will be recognized only when the price is fixed and determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service has been provided, and collectability is assured.  The Company is not exposed to any credit risks as amounts are prepaid prior to performance of services.
Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share	Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share
	The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company has 262,244,458 and 0 shares convertible under note agreement that are anti-dilutive and not included in diluted loss per share.
Financial Instruments	Financial Instruments
	The Company adopted the FASB standard related to fair value measurement at inception. The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. The standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and, accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements. The standard clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The recorded values of long-term debt approximate their fair values, as interest approximates market rates. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the standard established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows.
	Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
	Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
	Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
	The Company’s financial instruments are cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and amounts due to related parties. The recorded values of cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and amounts due to related parties approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature.
	The following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured and recognized at fair value as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 on a recurring basis:
			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014
	Description		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
	Derivative Liability	$	-	$	-	$	114,649	$	-
	Totals	$	-	$	-	$	114,649	$	-
			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013
	Description		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
	Derivative Liability	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
	Totals	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Income Taxes	Income Taxes
	Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted ASC 740 “Accounting for Income Taxes” as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC 740, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in this financial statement because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	Recent Accounting Pronouncements
	On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-16—Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update do not change the current criteria in GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. That is, an entity will continue to evaluate whether the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria. The amendments clarify how current GAAP should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. The effects of initially adopting the amendments in this Update should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods.
	On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-17—Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force).  The amendments in this Update provide an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. The amendments in this Update are effective on November 18, 2014. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event. However, if the financial statements for the period in which the most recent change-in-control event occurred already have been issued or made available to be issued, the application of this guidance would be a change in accounting principle.
	On August 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concerns (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.
	In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities”. The amendments in this update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the ASC thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP.  In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. The amendments in this update are applied retrospectively. The early adoption of ASU 2014-10 removed the development stage entity financial reporting requirements from the Company.
	In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In July 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." The provisions of ASU No. 2013-11 require an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion thereof, in the statement of financial position as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions related to availability. ASU No. 2013-11 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
	In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:
	·
	Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and
	·
	Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.
	The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
	In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Summary_of_Significant_Account2

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Summary of assets and liabilities that measured and recognized at fair value	The following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured and recognized at fair value as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 on a recurring basis:
			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014
	Description		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
	Derivative Liability	$	-	$	-	$	114,649	$	-
	Totals	$	-	$	-	$	114,649	$	-
			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013
	Description		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
	Derivative Liability	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
	Totals	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

Derivative_Liabilities_Tables

Derivative Liabilities (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]
Changes in the fair market value of the derivative liability	The following is a summary of changes in the fair market value of the derivative liability during the years ended December 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively:
			Derivative
			Liability
			Convertible
			Debts Total
	Balance, December 31, 2013	$	-
	Increase in derivative value due to issuances of convertible promissory notes		208,597
	Decrease in derivative value due to issuances of common stocks for conversions		-98,454
	Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities due to the mark to market adjustment		4,506
	Balance, December 31, 2014	$	114,649

Common_Shares_Tables

Common Shares (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Stockholders' Equity Note [Abstract]
Summary of shares outstanding	Following the above events, there were 161,000,000 shares outstanding, including:
	Shares	Held By:
	125,000,000	TMSI Shareholders
	36,000,000	Existing DMHI Shareholders
Summary of common Stock Issued for Debt Conversions
	Date		Number of		Fair Value of
			shares converted		Debt Converted
	9/15/14		6,708,698	$	30,634
	9/22/14		6,719,753	$	29,523
	10/7/14		2,904,864	$	15,155
	12/4/14		5,773,171	$	14,129
	Date		Number of		Fair Value of
			shares converted		Debt Converted
	10/20/14		1,724,137	$	13,334
	10/30/14		1,785,714	$	13,596
	11/10/14		1,851,851	$	12,573
	12/15/14		14,531,298	$	41,948

Merger_Tables

Merger (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Business Combinations [Abstract]
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed	According to the purchase method of accounting, the Company recognized the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:
			22-Jul-14
	Consideration:
	Preferred convertible stock issued	$	1,600,000
	Cash paid prior to closing		20,000
	Total consideration given		1,620,000
	Fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
	Cash	$	11,947
	Due to a related party		-2,300
	Total fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed		9,647
	Consideration paid in excess of fair value (Goodwill)(1)		1,610,353
	Impairment of goodwill at 12/31/2014		-1,610,353
	Fair value of goodwill at 12/31/2014		-
	(1)   The consideration paid in excess of the net fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been recognized as goodwill.

Income_Taxes_Tables

Income Taxes (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Schedule of Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation
		December 31,	December 31,
		2014	2013
		$	$
	Net loss carry forward	-1,945,966	-1,382,650
	Statutory rate	34%	34%
	Computed expected tax recovery	661,628	470,101
	Valuation allowance	-661,628	-470,101
	Income tax provision	–	–

Description_of_Business_and_Re1

Description of Business and Reverse Acquisition (Details Narrative) (USD $)	0 Months Ended
	Dec. 11, 2012	Dec. 31, 2014	Jul. 22, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Working Capital (Deficit) (in Dollars)		$1,481,959
Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit) (in Dollars)		-4,849,268		-2,120,631	-1,019,053
Business Acquisition, Shares Acquired in Purchase	100
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Acquisitions	125,000,000
Number of Shares for Issuance Canceled	100,000,000
Treasury Stock, Shares	0
Convertible preferred stock shares issued			10,000,000
Number of common stock from one preferred stock			20
Fair value			$1,600,000
Common stock price			$0.01
President And Director [Member]
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Acquisitions	100,000,000
Noncontrolling Interest, Ownership Percentage by Parent	78.00%

Summary_of_Significant_Account3

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Derivative Liability
Totals
Level 1 [Member]
Derivative Liability
Totals
Level 2 [Member]
Derivative Liability
Totals
Level 3 [Member]
Derivative Liability	114,649
Totals	$114,649

Summary_of_Significant_Account4

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details Narratives) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Cash Equivalents, at Carrying Value	$0	$0
Property, Plant and Equipment, Useful Life	3 years
Antidilutive Securities Excluded from Computation of Earnings Per Share, Amount	262,244,458	0
Impairment loss of goodwill	$1,610,353

Related_Party_Transactions_Det

Related Party Transactions (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Imputed Interest	$59,291	$57,234
Due to Related Parties	2,300	0
Additional paid-in capital	19,533	14,694
Chief Financial Officer [Member]
Management Fee Payable	89,216	89,216
Imputed Interest	7,137	7,555
Management Fees	180,000	120,000
Receivable with Imputed Interest, Effective Yield (Interest Rate)	8.00%
Chief Executive Officer [Member]
Management Fee Payable	438,088	443,523
Receivable with Imputed Interest, Effective Yield (Interest Rate)	8.00%
Additional paid-in capital	32,621	26,193
Company Formerly Controlled By CFO [Member]
Imputed Interest	19,533	14,694
Accounts Payable, Related Parties	$101,522	$101,522

Convertible_Notes_Details_Narr

Convertible Notes (Details Narratives) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Restricted stock	22,106,486
Restricted stock value	$40,000
Fair value of note	89,441
Fair value of debt balance	89,441
Derivative liability	49,441
Additional shares issued loss	2,324
Convertible note payable, at fair value	114,649
Recognized gain in changes in fair value of derivative	4,506
Amortization	181,397
March 31 2014 [Member]
Restricted stock	19,893,000
Restricted stock value	32,438
Fair value of note	81,451
Fair value of debt balance	81,451
Derivative liability	49,013
Additional shares issued loss	$12,550

Derivative_Liabilities_Details

Derivative Liabilities (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]
Balance, December 31, 2013
Increase in derivative value due to issuances of convertible promissory notes	208,597
Decrease in derivative value due to issuances of common stocks for conversions	-98,454
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities due to the mark to market adjustment	4,506
Balance, December 31, 2014	$114,649

Derivative_Liabilities_Details1

Derivative Liabilities (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]
Changes in fair value of derivatives	$4,506
Loss due to value in excess of face value of convertible notes	41,902
Market value of the convertible notes	$37,396

Common_Shares_Details

Common Shares (Details)	Sep. 30, 2013
Existing DMHI [Member]
Shares Outstanding	36,000,000
TMSI [Member]
Shares Outstanding	125,000,000

Common_Shares_Details_1

Common Shares (Details 1) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
September15 2014 [Member]
Number of shares converted	6,708,698
Fair Value of Debt Converted	$30,634
September 22 2014 [Member]
Number of shares converted	6,719,753
Fair Value of Debt Converted	29,523
October 7 2014 [Member]
Number of shares converted	2,904,864
Fair Value of Debt Converted	15,155
December 4 2014 [Member]
Number of shares converted	5,773,171
Fair Value of Debt Converted	14,129
October 20 2014 [Member]
Number of shares converted	1,724,137
Fair Value of Debt Converted	13,334
October 30 2014 [Member]
Number of shares converted	1,785,714
Fair Value of Debt Converted	13,596
November 10 2014 [Member]
Number of shares converted	1,851,851
Fair Value of Debt Converted	12,573
December 15 2014 [Member]
Number of shares converted	14,531,298
Fair Value of Debt Converted	$41,948

Common_Shares_Details_Narrativ

Common Shares (Details Narratives) (USD $)	0 Months Ended	12 Months Ended		1 Months Ended
	Dec. 11, 2012	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013	Nov. 30, 2013	Jul. 31, 2013	Jun. 30, 2013	Apr. 30, 2013	Oct. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	30-May-13
Percentage of Issued and Outstanding Stock Issued	100.00%
Treasury Stock, Shares, Acquired	125,000,000
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Acquisitions	125,000,000
Number of Shares for Issuance Canceled	100,000,000
Common Stock, Shares, Outstanding	161,000,000	351,999,486	271,500,000
Common Stock, Par or Stated Value Per Share (in Dollars per share)		$0.00	$0.00						$0.00
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Issued for Services		320,000	654,650
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Issued for Services (in Dollars)		$320,000	$654,650
Closing price of common stock price		$0.01
convertible preferred stocks		10,000,000
Value of shares which have not been issued due to administrative delay		160,000,000
Fair value of preferred stocks issuable		160,000,000
Equity compensation charge		3,500,000	19,350,000
Equity compensation charge one		6,000,000	6,450,000
Equity compensation charge two		10,000,000	650,000
Equity compensation charge three		7,500,000	10,810,000
Equity compensation charge four		5,000,000	17,290,000
Equity compensation charge Five			4,095,000
Equity compensation charge six			6,820,000
Private Placement [Member]
Common Stock, Par or Stated Value Per Share (in Dollars per share)										$0.01
Common Stock, No Par Value (in Dollars per share)				$0.01
Restricted Stock [Member] | Investor Relations And Consulting Services [Member]
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Issued for Services				3,500,000	23,000,000
Share Price (in Dollars per share)					$0.00
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Issued for Services (in Dollars)				6,820,000	10,810,000
Restricted Stock [Member] | Investor Relations And Consulting Services [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Share Price (in Dollars per share)				$0.01
Restricted Stock [Member] | Investor Relations And Consulting Services [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Share Price (in Dollars per share)				$0.02
Restricted Stock [Member] | Investor Relations Service [Member]
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Issued for Services						1,000,000	5,000,000
Share Price (in Dollars per share)						$0.01	$0.01
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Issued for Services (in Dollars)						650,000	6,450,000
Restricted Stock [Member] | Marketing Service [Member]
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Issued for Services							15,000,000
Share Price (in Dollars per share)							$0.01
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Issued for Services (in Dollars)							19,350,000
Restricted Stock [Member] | Consulting Services [Member]
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Issued for Services								4,500,000
Share Price (in Dollars per share)								$0.01
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Issued for Services (in Dollars)								4,095,000
President And Director [Member]
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Acquisitions	100,000,000
Noncontrolling Interest, Ownership Percentage by Parent	78.00%
Officers And Employees [Member] | Restricted Stock [Member]
Stock Issued During Period, Shares, Issued for Services								19,000,000
Share Price (in Dollars per share)								$0.01
Stock Issued During Period, Value, Issued for Services (in Dollars)								$17,290,000

Merger_Details

Merger (Details) (USD $)	Dec. 31, 2014
Business Combinations [Abstract]
Preferred convertible stock issued	1,600,000
Cash paid prior to closing	$20,000
Total consideration given	1,620,000
Cash	11,947
Due to a related party	-2,300
Total fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed	9,647
Consideration paid in excess of fair value (Goodwill)(1)	1,610,353
Impairment of goodwill at 12/31/2014	-1,610,353
Fair value of goodwill at 12/31/2014

Merger_Details_Narrative

Merger (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Business Combinations [Abstract]
Convertible preferred stocks	10,000,000
Fair value of preferred stocks issuable	$160,000,000
closing price of common stock price	$0.01
goodwill	1,610,353
Impairment loss of goodwill	$1,610,353

Income_Taxes_Details

Income Taxes (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Income Taxes Details
Net loss carry forward	($1,945,966)	($1,382,650)
Statutory rate	34.00%	34.00%
Computed expected tax recovery	661,628	470,101
Valuation allowance	-661,628	-470,101
Income tax provision

Income_Taxes_Details_Narrative

Income Taxes (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Operating Loss Carryforwards	$1,945,966	$1,382,650
Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation, at Federal Statutory Income Tax Rate, Percent	34.00%	34.00%
Liability for Uncertain Tax Positions, Current	$0	$0

Subsequent_Events_Details_Narr

Subsequent Events (Details Narrative) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2014
Subsequent Event [Member]
Restricted stock issued	25,000,000
Value of convertible notes	$250,000
March 2014 [Member]
Value of convertible note agreement	50,000
Debt holder converted shares	19,962,450
Remaining amount of note in full	19,961
April 2014 [Member]
Value of convertible note agreement	50,000
Debt holder converted shares	19,000,000
Remaining amount of note in full	$19,000