UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-QSB
(Mark One)
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
For the transition period from _________to _________
Commission file number 2-84760
WINTHROP GROWTH INVESTORS 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts
04-2839837
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
Greenville, South Carolina 29602
(Address of principal executive offices)
(864) 239-1000
(Issuer's telephone number)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ___
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes __ No X_
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
Financial Statements
WINTHROP GROWTH INVESTORS 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
September 30, 2006
| | |
Assets | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ 1,327 |
Receivables | | 2 |
| | 1,329 |
Liabilities | | |
Accounts payable | | 3 |
Other liabilities | | 18 |
Estimated costs during the period of liquidation (Note B) | | 5 |
| | 26 |
Net assets in liquidation | | $ 1,303 |
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
WINTHROP GROWTH INVESTORS 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
| |
| For the Period From |
| April 1, 2006 to |
| September 30, 2006 |
| |
Net assets in liquidation at beginning of period | $ 13,062 |
| |
Changes in net assets in liquidation attributed to: | |
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (11,367) |
Decrease in receivables | (752) |
Decrease in other assets | (2) |
Decrease in accounts payable | 337 |
Increase in other liabilities | (13) |
Decrease in estimated costs during the period of | |
liquidation | 38 |
Net assets in liquidation at end of period | $ 1,303 |
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
WINTHROP GROWTH INVESTORS 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per unit data)
| | | |
| Period from | Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended |
| January 1, 2006 to | September 30, | September 30, |
| March 31, 2006 | 2005 | 2005 |
| | (Restated) | (Restated) |
Income from continuing operations | $ -- | $ -- | $ -- |
(Loss) income from discontinued | | | |
operations: (Note A) | | | |
Revenues: | | | |
Rental income | 660 | 647 | 3,051 |
Other income | 81 | 78 | 262 |
Casualty gain (Note F) | -- | 105 | 134 |
Total revenues | 741 | 830 | 3,447 |
| | | |
Expenses: | | | |
Operating | 373 | 312 | 1,374 |
General and administrative | 43 | 30 | 132 |
Depreciation | 169 | 159 | 674 |
Interest | 97 | 99 | 543 |
Property tax | 54 | 59 | 267 |
Casualty loss (Note F) | -- | 10 | 10 |
Loss on early extinguishment of | | | |
debt | 1,122 | -- | 283 |
Total expenses | 1,858 | 669 | 3,283 |
(Loss) income from discontinued | | | |
operations | (1,117) | 161 | 164 |
Gain from sale of discontinued | | | |
operations (Note C) | 13,345 | -- | 22,064 |
Net income | $12,228 | $ 161 | $22,228 |
Net income allocated to general | | | |
partners | $ -- | $ 16 | $ 225 |
Net income allocated to limited | | | |
partners | 12,228 | 145 | 22,003 |
| $12,228 | $ 161 | $22,228 |
Per limited partnership unit: | | | |
(Loss) income from discontinued | | | |
operations | $ (48.27) | $ 6.27 | $ 5.15 |
Gain from sale of discontinued | | | |
operations | 576.73 | -- | 945.76 |
Net income per limited partnership | | | |
unit | $528.46 | $ 6.27 | $950.91 |
Distributions per limited | | | |
partnership unit | $ -- | $ 58.34 | $822.20 |
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
WINTHROP GROWTH INVESTORS 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL/NET ASSETS IN LIQUIDATION
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except unit data)
| | | | |
| Limited | | |
| Partnership | General | Limited | |
| Units | Partners | Partners | Total |
| | | | |
Original capital contributions | 23,149 | $ 2 | $23,149 | $23,151 |
| | | | |
Partners' capital at | | | | |
December 31, 2005 | 23,139 | $ 31 | $ 846 | $ 877 |
| | | | |
Net income for the three months | | | | |
ended March 31, 2006 | -- | -- | 12,228 | 12,228 |
| | | | |
Partners' capital | | | | |
at March 31, 2006 | 23,139 | $ 31 | $13,074 | $13,105 |
| | | | |
Adjustment to liquidation basis | | | | |
(Note B) | | | | (43) |
Net assets in liquidation at | | | | |
March 31, 2006 | | | | $13,062 |
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
WINTHROP GROWTH INVESTORS 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
| | |
| Period From | Nine Months Ended |
| January 1, 2006 to | September 30, |
| March 31, 2006 | 2005 |
Cash flows from operating activities: | | |
Net income | $12,228 | $22,228 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash | | |
(used in) provided by operating activities: | | |
Depreciation | 169 | 674 |
Amortization of loan costs and deferred costs | 5 | 30 |
Bad debt expense, net | 13 | 39 |
Gain from sale of discontinued operations | (13,345) | (22,064) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 1,122 | 283 |
Casualty gain | -- | (124) |
Change in accounts: | | |
Receivables and deposits | (697) | 244 |
Other assets | 50 | 166 |
Accounts payable | 169 | (114) |
Tenant security deposit liabilities | (36) | (135) |
Accrued property taxes | -- | 177 |
Other liabilities | (105) | (173) |
Net cash (used in) provided by operating | | |
activities | (427) | 1,231 |
Cash flows from investing activities: | | |
Net proceeds from sale of discontinued operations | 17,034 | 28,052 |
Property improvements and replacements | (105) | (962) |
Insurance proceeds received | -- | 155 |
Net withdrawals from restricted escrows | -- | 198 |
Net cash provided by investing activities | 16,929 | 27,443 |
Cash flows from financing activities: | | |
Payments on mortgage notes payable | (49) | (251) |
Repayment of mortgage notes payable | (5,228) | (8,008) |
Prepayment penalties | -- | (260) |
Distributions paid to partners | -- | (19,029) |
Advances from affiliate | -- | 90 |
Repayment of advances from affiliate | -- | (90) |
Net cash used in financing activities | (5,277) | (27,548) |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 11,225 | 1,126 |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 1,469 | 308 |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $12,694 | $ 1,434 |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | | |
Cash paid for interest | $ 128 | $ 633 |
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity: | | |
Property improvements and replacements included in | | |
accounts payable | $ 55 | $ 14 |
Included in property improvements and replacements for the period from January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006 and the nine months ended September 30, 2005 are approximately $11,000 and $23,000, respectively, of improvements, which were included in accounts payable at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
WINTHROP GROWTH INVESTORS 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note A – Basis of Presentation
As of March 31, 2006, Winthrop Growth Investors 1 Limited Partnership (the “Partnership” or “Registrant”) adopted the liquidation basis of accounting due to the sale of its remaining investment property (as discussed in “Note C – Sale of Investment Properties”). The general partner of the Partnership is AIMCO/Winthrop Growth Investor I GP, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company (the “Managing General Partner”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of AIMCO Properties, L.P., an affiliate of Apartment Investment and Management Company ("AIMCO"), a publicly traded real estate investment trust.
As a result of the decision to liquidate the Partnership, the Partnership changed its basis of accounting for its consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2006, to the liquidation basis of accounting. Consequently, assets have been valued at estimated net realizable value and liabilities are presented at their estimated settlement amounts, including estimated costs associated with carrying out the liquidation of the Partnership. The valuation of assets and liabilities necessarily requires many estimates and assumptions and there are substantial uncertainties in carrying out the liquidation. The actual realization of assets and settlement of liabilities could be higher or lower than amounts indicated and is based upon the Managing General Partner’s best estimates as of the date of the consolidated financial statements.
The Managing General Partner estimates that the liquidation process will be completed by December 31, 2006. Because the success in realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities is based on the Managing General Partner’s best estimates, the liquidation period may be shorter than projected or it may be extended beyond the projected period.
The accompanying consolidated statements of discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 have been restated as of January 1, 2005 to reflect the operations of Ashton Ridge Apartments, which sold in 2006, and Stratford Place Apartments, which sold in 2005, as (loss) income from discontinued operations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”.
Note B – Adjustment to Liquidation Basis of Accounting
In accordance with the liquidation basis of accounting, at March 31, 2006, assets were adjusted to their estimated net realizable value and liabilities were adjusted to their estimated settlement amount. The net adjustment required to convert to the liquidation basis of accounting was a decrease in net assets of approximately $43,000, which is included in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Partners’ Capital/Net Assets in Liquidation. The net adjustments are summarized as follows:
| |
| Decrease in |
| Net Assets |
| (in thousands) |
| |
Adjustment of other assets and liabilities, net | $ (43) |
Note C – Sale of Investment Properties
On March 31, 2006, the Partnership sold its remaining investment property, Ashton Ridge Apartments, to a third party. The purchaser purchased the property along with eight other apartment complexes and one parcel of land, all of which were owned by entities affiliated with AIMCO Properties, L.P., which is an affiliate of the Managing General Partner. The total sales price for Ashton Ridge Apartments, the eight other apartment complexes and the parcel of land was approximately $148,000,000, of which approximately $18,875,000 represented the sales price for Ashton Ridge Apartments. After payment of closing costs and a prepayment penalty, the net sales proceeds received by the Partnership were approximately $17,034,000. The Partnership used a portion of the proceeds to repay the mortgage encumbering the property of approximately $5,228,000. The sale resulted in a gain of approximately $13,345,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2006. In addition, the Partnership recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $1,122,000 as a result of a prepayment penalty and the write off of unamortized loan costs.
On May 17, 2005, the Partnership sold Stratford Place Apartments, located in Gaithersburg, Maryland, to a third party for $29,000,000. After payment of closing costs, the net sales proceeds received by the Partnership were approximately $28,052,000. The Partnership used a portion of the proceeds to repay the mortgage encumbering the property of approximately $8,008,000. The sale resulted in a gain of approximately $22,064,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2005. In addition, the Partnership recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 of approximately $283,000 as a result of prepayment penalties paid and the write off of unamortized loan costs.
Note D – Transactions with Affiliated Parties
The Partnership has no employees and depends on the Managing General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all Partnership activities. The Partnership Agreement provides for certain payments to affiliates for services and reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.
Affiliates of the Managing General Partner received 5% of gross receipts from the Partnership’s properties as compensation for providing property management services. The Partnership paid to such affiliates approximately $37,000 and $170,000, respectively, during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, which is included in operating expenses.
Affiliates of the Managing General Partner charged the Partnership for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $48,000 and $175,000, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, which is included in general and administrative expenses and gain from sale of discontinued operations. The portion of these reimbursements included in gain from sale of discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are fees related to construction management services provided by an affiliate of the Managing General Partner of approximately $11,000 and $89,000, respectively.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and in accordance with the Partnership Agreement, an affiliate of the Managing General Partner advanced the Partnership approximately $90,000 to fund the payment of real estate taxes at Ashton Ridge Apartments. Interest was charged at the prime rate plus 2% and was less than $1,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The advance and associated accrued interest were repaid by the Partnership during the same period. There were no advances from the Managing General Partner during the nine months ended September 30, 2006.
The Partnership insured its properties up to certain limits through coverage provided by AIMCO, which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. The Partnership insured its properties above the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO from insurers unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates approximately $48,000 and $44,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration.
Note E – Supplementary Information Required Pursuant to Section 9.4 of thePartnership Agreement
Statement of cash available for distribution for the period from January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2006 (in thousands):
| |
| Period from January 1, |
| 2006 to March 31, |
| 2006 |
| |
Net income | $12,228 |
Add: Amortization expense | 5 |
Depreciation expense | 169 |
Less: Cash to reserves | (426) |
| |
Cash available for distribution | $11,976 |
| |
Distributions allocated to | |
Limited Partners | $11,970 |
General Partners’ interest in cash | |
available for distribution | $ 6 |
No cash was generated from operations during the period from April 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006, as there were no operating activities during this period.
Note F – Casualty Events
During the nine months ended September 30, 2005 there was a casualty gain of approximately $100,000 recorded for Stratford Place Apartments related to damages to the property caused by a fire on January 12, 2005. This gain was the result of the receipt of insurance proceeds of approximately $121,000, partially offset by the write off of undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $21,000.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2005 there was a casualty gain of approximately $34,000 recorded for Stratford Place Apartments related to damages to the property caused by a flood on February 1, 2005. This gain was the result of the receipt of insurance proceeds of approximately $34,000, as the damaged assets were fully depreciated.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006 there was a fire at Ashton Ridge Apartments resulting in damages of approximately $150,000. The Partnership received insurance proceeds of approximately $134,000 subsequent to the sale of the property. These proceeds are included in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets in Liquidation and covered the estimated repairs. No casualty loss will occur from this event.
In 2004, Ashton Ridge Apartments experienced damage from hurricane Jeanne. The Partnership estimated total damage costs of approximately $199,000, which the Partnership did not expect to be covered by insurance proceeds. In 2004, the Partnership estimated total cleanup costs from this hurricane would be approximately $20,000. In addition, the Partnership estimated clean up costs of approximately $51,000 related to hurricane Frances in 2004. During the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Partnership revised the total estimated clean up costs related to hurricane damage and reduced the estimate by approximately $56,000. This income is included in operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. During the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Partnership recorded a casualty loss of approximately $10,000 related to these events. This loss was the result of the write off of undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $10,000.
Note G - Contingencies
AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company, both affiliates of the Managing General Partner, are defendants in a lawsuit alleging that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per week. The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, attempts to bring a collective action under the FLSA and seeks to certify state subclasses in California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required to be "on-call." Additionally, the complaint alleges AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to comply with the FLSA in compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in excess of 40 hours in a week. In J une 2005 the court conditionally certified the collective action on both the on-call and overtime issues. Approximately 1,049 individuals opted in to the class. The defendants moved to decertify the collective action on both issues and the plaintiffs have responded. Because the court denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify state subclasses, in September 2005, the plaintiffs filed a class action with the same allegations in the Superior Court of California (Contra Costa County), and in November 2005 in Montgomery County Maryland Circuit Court. The California and Maryland cases have been stayed pending the outcome of the decertification motion in the District of Columbia case. Although the outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties, L.P. does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Similarly, the Managing General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
The Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding litigation matters involving it or its former investment properties that are not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.
Environmental
Various Federal, state and local laws subject property owners or operators to liability for management, and the costs of removal or remediation, of certain hazardous substances present on a property. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of the hazardous substances. The presence of, or the failure to manage or remedy properly, hazardous substances may adversely affect occupancy at affected apartment communities and the ability to sell or finance affected properties. In addition to the costs associated with investigation and remediation actions brought by government agencies, and potential fines or penalties imposed by such agencies in connection therewith, the presence of hazardous substances on a property could result in claims by private plaintiffs for personal injury, disease, disability or other infirmities. Various laws also impose liability for the cost of removal, remediation or disposal of hazardous substances through a licensed disposal or treatment facility. Anyone who arranges for the disposal or treatment of hazardous substances is potentially liable under such laws. These laws often impose liability whether or not the person arranging for the disposal ever owned or operated the disposal facility. In connection with the ownership, operation and management of its former properties, the Partnership could potentially be liable for environmental liabilities or costs associated with its former properties.
Mold
The Partnership is aware of lawsuits against owners and managers of multifamily properties asserting claims of personal injury and property damage caused by the presence of mold, some of which have resulted in substantial monetary judgments or settlements. The Partnership has only limited insurance coverage for property damage loss claims arising from the presence of mold and for personal injury claims related to mold exposure. Affiliates of the Managing General Partner have implemented a national policy and procedures to prevent or eliminate mold from its properties and the Managing General Partner believes that these measures will minimize the effects that mold could have on residents. To date, the Partnership has not incurred any material costs or liabilities relating to claims of mold exposure or to abate mold conditions. Because the law regarding mold is unsettled and subject to change the Managing General Partner can m ake no assurance that liabilities resulting from the presence of or exposure to mold will not have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s consolidated financial condition.
ITEM 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a variety of risks and factors including, without limitation: national and local economic conditions; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting and defending claims and any adverse outcomes, and possible environmental liabilities. Readers should carefully review the Registrant's financial statements and the notes thereto, as well as the risk factors described in the documents the Registrant files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
As of March 31, 2006, the Partnership adopted the liquidation basis of accounting, due to the sale of its remaining investment property, Ashton Ridge Apartments, on March 31, 2006.
On March 31, 2006, the Partnership sold its remaining investment property, Ashton Ridge Apartments, to a third party. The purchaser purchased the property along with eight other apartment complexes and one parcel of land, all of which were owned by entities affiliated with AIMCO Properties, L.P., which is an affiliate of the Managing General Partner. The total sales price for Ashton Ridge Apartments, the eight other apartment complexes and the parcel of land was approximately $148,000,000, of which approximately $18,875,000 represented the sales price for Ashton Ridge Apartments. After payment of closing costs and a prepayment penalty, the net sales proceeds received by the Partnership were approximately $17,034,000. The Partnership used a portion of the proceeds to repay the mortgage encumbering the property of approximately $5,228,000. The sale resulted in a gain of approximately $13,345,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2006. In addition, the Partnership recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $1,122,000 as a result of a prepayment penalty and the write off of unamortized loan costs.
On May 17, 2005, the Partnership sold Stratford Place Apartments, located in Gaithersburg, Maryland, to a third party for $29,000,000. After payment of closing costs, the net sales proceeds received by the Partnership were approximately $28,052,000. The Partnership used a portion of the proceeds to repay the mortgage encumbering the property of approximately $8,008,000. The sale resulted in a gain of approximately $22,064,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2005. In addition, the Partnership recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 of approximately $283,000 as a result of prepayment penalties paid and the write off of unamortized loan costs.
As a result of the decision to liquidate the Partnership, the Partnership changed its basis of accounting for its consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2006, to the liquidation basis of accounting. Consequently, assets have been valued at estimated net realizable value and liabilities are presented at their estimated settlement amounts, including estimated costs associated with carrying out the liquidation of the Partnership. The valuation of assets and liabilities necessarily requires many estimates and assumptions and there are substantial uncertainties in carrying out the liquidation. The actual realization of assets and settlement of liabilities could be higher or lower than amounts indicated and is based upon the Managing General Partner’s best estimates as of the date of the consolidated financial statements.
During the period from April 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006, net assets in liquidation decreased by approximately $11,759,000. The decrease in net assets in liquidation is primarily due to decreases in cash and cash equivalents and receivables partially offset by decreases in accounts payable and the estimated costs during the period of liquidation. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents is primarily due to the distribution of proceeds from the sale of Ashton Ridge Apartments. The decrease in receivables is primarily due to recoupment of a non-resident withholding tax. The decrease in accounts payable is primarily due to the final payment of insurance premiums, capital improvements and a reduction in the estimates established for liabilities related to the sale of Ashton Ridge Apartments. The decrease in the estimated costs during the period of liquidation is the result of a shorter liquidation period as of September 30, 2006 as compared to March 31, 2006.
The statement of net assets in liquidation as of September 30, 2006 includes approximately $5,000 of costs that the Managing General Partner estimates will be incurred during the period of liquidation, based on the assumption that the liquidation process will be completed by December 31, 2006. Because the success in realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities, including liabilities related to the cases discussed in “Item 1. Financial Statements - Note G – Contingencies” to the consolidated financial statements, is based on the Managing General Partner’s best estimates, the liquidation period may be shorter or extended beyond the projected period.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Partnership paid a distribution of approximately $11,976,000 or $517.31 per limited partnership unit from proceeds from the sale of Ashton Ridge Apartments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Partnership paid distributions of approximately $19,029,000 or $822.20 per limited partnership unit from proceeds from the May 2005 sale of Stratford Place Apartments. Future cash distributions will depend on the amount of cash remaining after fully liquidating the Partnership. The Partnership’s cash available for distribution will be reviewed on a quarterly basis.
In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interests in the Partnership, AIMCO and its affiliates owned 10,984.25 limited partnership units (the "Units") in the Partnership representing 47.47% of the outstanding Units at September 30, 2006. A number of these Units were acquired pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or its affiliates. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the Units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that would include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 47.47% of the outstanding Units, AIMCO and its affiliates are in a position to influence all voting decisions with respect to the Partnership. Although the Managing General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the Managing General Partner, as managing general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Managing General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.
ITEM 3.
Controls and Procedures
(a)
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Partnership’s management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Managing General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnership’s disclosure contr ols and procedures are effective.
(b)
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
Legal Proceedings
AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company, both affiliates of the Managing General Partner, are defendants in a lawsuit alleging that they willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) by failing to pay maintenance workers overtime for all hours worked in excess of forty per week. The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, attempts to bring a collective action under the FLSA and seeks to certify state subclasses in California, Maryland, and the District of Columbia. Specifically, the plaintiffs contend that AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to compensate maintenance workers for time that they were required to be "on-call." Additionally, the complaint alleges AIMCO Properties L.P. and NHP Management Company failed to comply with the FLSA in compensating maintenance workers for time that they worked in excess of 40 hours in a week. In J une 2005 the court conditionally certified the collective action on both the on-call and overtime issues. Approximately 1,049 individuals opted in to the class. The defendants moved to decertify the collective action on both issues and the plaintiffs have responded. Because the court denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify state subclasses, in September 2005, the plaintiffs filed a class action with the same allegations in the Superior Court of California (Contra Costa County), and in November 2005 in Montgomery County Maryland Circuit Court. The California and Maryland cases have been stayed pending the outcome of the decertification motion in the District of Columbia case. Although the outcome of any litigation is uncertain, AIMCO Properties, L.P. does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial condition or results of operations. Similarly, the Managing General Partner does not believe that the ultimate outcome will have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 5.
Other Information
None.
ITEM 6.
Exhibits
See Exhibit Index Attached.
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| |
| WINTHROP GROWTH INVESTORS 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP |
| |
| By: AIMCO/Winthrop Growth Investors I, GP, LLC |
| Managing General Partner |
| |
Date: November 13, 2006 | By: /s/Martha L. Long |
| Martha L. Long |
| Senior Vice President |
| |
Date: November 13, 2006 | By: /s/Stephen B. Waters |
| Stephen B. Waters |
| Vice President |
WINTHROP GROWTH INVESTORS 1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Exhibit Index
Exhibit Number
Description of Exhibit
3.1
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Winthrop Growth Investors 1 Limited Partnership dated May 11, 1984 (included as an exhibit to the Partnership's Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 2-84760 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2
Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated August 23, 1985 (Exhibit 3(a) to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 is incorporated herein by reference).
3.3
Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, dated November 20, 2003, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 3, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.
3.4
Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, dated September 30, 2004, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 30, 2004 and filed on October 5, 2004, incorporated herein by reference.
3.5
Certificate of Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership of Winthrop Growth Investors 1 Limited Partnership, filed as an exhibit to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 30, 2004 and filed on
October 5, 2004, incorporated herein by reference.
10.2
Purchase Agreement between Linnaeus-Lexington Associates Limited Partnership and AIMCO/Winthrop Growth Investors 1 GP, LLC, dated September 30, 2004, filed as exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 30, 2004 and filed on October 5, 2004, incorporated herein by reference.
10.3
Assignment and Assumption of General Partner Interest in Winthrop Growth Investors 1 Limited Partnership, dated September 30, 2004, filed as exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 30, 2004 and filed on October 5, 2004, incorporated herein by reference.
10.4
Assignment and Assumption of General Partner Interest in Winthrop Growth Investors 1 Limited Partnership, dated September 30, 2004, filed as exhibit 10.24 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 30, 2004 and filed on October 5, 2004, incorporated herein by reference.
10.5
Purchase and Sale Contract between Stratford Place Investors Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, as Seller, and FF Realty LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as Purchaser, effective February 28, 2005 filed as exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 28, 2005 and filed on March 4, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.6
First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Contract between Stratford Place Investors Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, as Seller, and FF Realty LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as Purchaser, dated March 30, 2005; filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 17, 2005 and filed on May 20, 2005, incorporated herein by reference.
10.7
Second Amendment to Purchase and Sale Contract between Stratford Place Investors Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership, as Seller, and FF Realty LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as Purchaser, dated April 28, 2005; filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 17, 2005 and filed on May 20, 2005, incorporated herein by reference.
10.8
Purchase and Sale Contract between the Original Selling Partnerships and The Bethany Group, LLC, a California limited liability company, dated November 2, 2005; filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 6, 2005 and filed on December 12, 2005, incorporated herein by reference.
10.9
First Amendment to the Purchase and Sale Contract between Meadow Wood Associates, a Florida general partnership, the Original Selling Partnerships and The Bethany Group, LLC, a California limited liability company, dated December 6, 2005; filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 6, 2005 and filed on December 12, 2005, incorporated herein by reference.
10.10
Second Amendment to the Purchase and Sale Contract between Meadow Wood Associates, a Florida general partnership, the Original Selling Partnerships and The Bethany Group, LLC, a California limited liability company, dated February 9, 2006; filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 9, 2006 and filed on February 15, 2006, incorporated herein by reference.
31.1
Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Martha L. Long, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Winthrop Growth Investors 1 Limited Partnership;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 13, 2006
/s/Martha L. Long
Martha L. Long
Senior Vice President of AIMCO/Winthrop Growth Investors I, GP, LLC, equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Winthrop Growth Investors 1 Limited Partnership;
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.
The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 13, 2006
/s/Stephen B. Waters
Stephen B. Waters
Vice President of AIMCO/Winthrop Growth Investors I, GP, LLC, equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership
Exhibit 32.1
Certification of CEO and CFO
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Winthrop Growth Investors 1 Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| |
| /s/Martha L. Long |
| Name: Martha L. Long |
| Date: November 13, 2006 |
| |
| /s/Stephen B. Waters |
| Name: Stephen B. Waters |
| Date: November 13, 2006 |
This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.