BRIGHTHOUSE LIFE INSURANCE 8-K Other Events

EXHIBIT 99.1

The 2011 Annual Report is being revised to reflect the impact on previously filed financial statements and other disclosures therein of the three actions taken by MICC described in Item 8.01 of this Current Report on Form 8-K. The 2011 Annual Report is revised as follows:

• the information set forth under the heading “Part I, Item 1. Business,” beginning with the first paragraph and continuing through and including the last paragraph under the heading “Reinsurance Activity” in the 2011 Annual Report is replaced in its entirety by the information set forth below in this Exhibit 99.1 under the heading “Part 1, Item 1. Business.”

• the information set forth in the following sections under the heading of “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the 2011 Annual Report is replaced in its entirety by the information set forth below in this Exhibit 99.1 in the corresponding sections under the heading of “Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”:

- Introduction

- Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates

- Results of Operations

• the information set forth under the heading “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in the 2011 Annual Report is replaced in its entirety by the information set forth below in this Exhibit 99.1 under the heading “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

• the information set forth under the heading “Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules” in the 2011 Annual Report is replaced in its entirety by the information set forth below in this Exhibit 99.1 under the heading “Part IV, Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.”

Other than as set forth herein, the 2011 Annual Report remains unchanged. Those sections of the 2011 Annual Report which have not been revised as set forth herein are not materially impacted by the actions taken by MICC described in this Form 8-K and/or have already been updated through the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including Risk Factors and the Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and are not included in this Current Report on Form 8-K. Accordingly, the revised information set forth in this Current Report on Form 8-K should be read in conjunction with the 2011 Annual Report.

Part I

Item 1.  Business

For purposes of this discussion, “MICC,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, a Connecticut corporation incorporated in 1863, and its subsidiaries, including MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company. MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut is a wholly-owned subsidiary of MetLife, Inc. (“MetLife”).

As announced in November 2011, MetLife reorganized its business into three broad geographic regions. As a result, in the first quarter of 2012, MICC reorganized into two segments: Retail Products and Corporate Benefit Funding. In addition, the Company reports certain of its results of operations in Corporate & Other. Prior period results have been revised in connection with this reorganization. Management continues to evaluate the Company’s segment performance and allocated resources and may adjust such measurements in the future to better reflect segment profitability.

Our Retail Products segment includes our Annuities and Life businesses, which were previously reported in our former Retirement Products and Insurance Products segments, respectively. In addition, our Corporate Benefit Funding segment remains essentially unchanged from prior periods. Lastly, our non-medical health business, which was previously reported in our former Insurance Products segment, is now reported in Corporate & Other.

1

Our Retail Products segment offers a broad range of protection products and a variety of annuities primarily to individuals, and is organized into two businesses:    Annuities and Life. Annuities include variable and fixed annuities which provide for both asset accumulation and asset distribution needs. Life insurance products include variable life, universal life, term life and whole life products, including participating business.

Our Corporate Benefit Funding segment includes an array of annuity and investment products, including guaranteed interest products and other stable value products, income annuities, and separate account contracts for the investment management of defined benefit and defined contribution plan assets.

Corporate & Other contains the excess capital not allocated to the segments, run-off business, the Company’s ancillary international operations and non-medical health business, interest expense related to the majority of the Company’s outstanding debt, expenses associated with certain legal proceedings and income tax audit issues. Corporate & Other also includes the elimination of intersegment amounts.

Operating revenues derived from any customer did not exceed 10% of consolidated operating revenues in any of the last three years. Financial information, including revenues, expenses, operating earnings, and total assets by segment, is provided in Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Operating revenues and operating earnings are performance measures that are not based on accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for definitions of such measures.

Sales Distribution

We market our products and services through various distribution groups. Our Retail Annuities and Life products targeted to individuals are sold via sales forces, comprised of MetLife employees, in addition to third-party organizations. Our corporate benefit funding products are sold via sales forces primarily comprised of MetLife employees. MetLife sales employees work with all distribution groups to better reach and service customers, brokers, consultants and other intermediaries.

Individual Distribution

Our individual distribution sales group targets the large middle-income market, as well as affluent individuals, owners of small businesses and executives of small- to medium-sized companies. We have also been successful in selling our products in various multi-cultural markets. The individual distribution sales group is comprised of three channels: the MetLife distribution channel, a career agency system, the New England Financial distribution channel, a general agency system, and MetLife Resources, a career agency system.

Retail Annuity products are sold through our individual distribution sales group and also through various third-party organizations such as regional broker-dealers, New York Stock Exchange brokerage firms, financial planners and banks.

Retail Life products are sold through our individual distribution sales group and also through various third-party organizations utilizing two models. In the coverage model, wholesalers sell to high net worth individuals and small- to medium-sized businesses through independent general agencies, financial advisors, consultants, brokerage general agencies and other independent marketing organizations under contractual arrangements. In the point of sale model, wholesalers sell through financial intermediaries, including regional broker-dealers, brokerage firms, financial planners and banks. Additionally, we sell term insurance through a direct marketing initiative.

Group Distribution

Corporate Benefit Funding products and services are distributed through dedicated sales teams and relationship managers located in offices around the country. Products may be sold directly to benefit plan sponsors and advisors or through brokers, consultants or other intermediaries. In addition, the retirement & benefits funding distribution organization works with individual distribution and group life distribution areas to better reach and service customers, brokers, consultants and other intermediaries.

2

Policyholder Liabilities

We establish, and carry as liabilities, actuarially determined amounts that are calculated to meet our policy obligations when a policy matures or is surrendered, an insured dies or becomes disabled or upon the occurrence of other covered events, or to provide for future annuity payments. Amounts for actuarial liabilities are computed and reported in the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP. For more details on Policyholder Liabilities see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates — Liability for Future Policy Benefits.”

In establishing actuarial liabilities for life and non-medical health insurance policies and annuity contracts, we distinguish between short and long duration contracts. Long duration contracts primarily consist of traditional whole life, guaranteed renewable term life, universal life, annuities and individual disability income and long-term care (“LTC”).

Actuarial liabilities for term life, whole life, LTC and limited pay contracts such as single premium immediate individual annuities, structured settlement annuities and certain group pension annuities are equal to the present value of future benefit payments and related expenses less the present value of future net premiums plus premium deficiency reserves, if any. For limited pay contracts, we also defer the excess of the gross premium over the net premium and recognize such excess into income in a constant relationship with insurance in-force for life insurance contracts and in relation to anticipated future benefit payments for annuity contracts.

We determine actuarial liabilities for long duration contracts using assumptions based on experience, plus a margin for adverse deviation. For these long duration contracts, assumptions such as mortality, morbidity and interest rates are “locked in” upon the issuance of new business. However, significant adverse changes in experience on such contracts may require us to establish premium deficiency reserves. Such reserves are determined based on assumptions at the time the premium deficiency reserve is established and do not include a provision for adverse deviation.

The actuarial liabilities established for the above products include future policy benefits (associated with base policies and riders, unearned mortality charges and future disability benefits), other policyholder liabilities (associated with unearned revenues and claims payable) and for unearned revenue (the unamortized portion of front-end loads charged). We also establish liabilities for minimum benefit guarantees relating to certain annuity contracts and secondary guarantees relating to certain life policies.

Liabilities for investment-type and universal life-type products primarily consist of policyholder account balances. Investment-type products include individual annuity contracts in the accumulation phase and certain group pension contracts that have limited or no mortality risk. Universal life-type products consist of universal and variable life contracts and contain group pension contracts. For universal life-type contracts with front-end loads, we defer the charge and amortize the unearned revenue using the product’s estimated gross profits.

Pursuant to state insurance laws and country regulators, we establish statutory reserves, reported as liabilities, to meet our obligations on our respective policies. These statutory reserves are established in amounts sufficient to meet policy and contract obligations, when taken together with expected future premiums and interest at assumed rates. Statutory reserves and actuarial liabilities for future policy benefits generally differ based on accounting guidance.

The Connecticut State Insurance Law and regulations require us to submit to the Connecticut Commissioner of Insurance (“Connecticut Commissioner”), or other state insurance departments, with each annual report, an opinion and memorandum of a “qualified actuary” that the statutory reserves and related actuarial amounts recorded in support of specified policies and contracts, and the assets supporting such statutory reserves and related actuarial amounts, make adequate provision for our statutory liabilities with respect to these obligations. See “— Regulation — Insurance Regulation — Policy and Contract Reserve Adequacy Analysis.”

3

Due to the nature of the underlying risks and the high degree of uncertainty associated with the determination of actuarial liabilities, we cannot precisely determine the amounts that will ultimately be paid with respect to these actuarial liabilities, and the ultimate amounts may vary from the estimated amounts, particularly when payments may not occur until well into the future.

However, we believe our actuarial liabilities for future benefits are adequate to cover the ultimate benefits required to be paid to policyholders. We periodically review our estimates of actuarial liabilities for future benefits and compare them with our actual experience. We revise estimates, to the extent permitted or required under GAAP, if we determine that future expected experience differs from assumptions used in the development of actuarial liabilities.

Underwriting and Pricing

Underwriting

Underwriting generally involves an evaluation of applications for Retail Products and Corporate Benefit Funding by a professional staff of underwriters and actuaries, who determine the type and the amount of risk that we are willing to accept. We employ detailed underwriting policies, guidelines and procedures designed to assist the underwriter to properly assess and quantify risks before issuing policies to qualified applicants or groups.

Insurance underwriting considers not only an applicant’s medical history, but also other factors such as financial profile, foreign travel, vocations and alcohol, drug and tobacco use. Group underwriting generally evaluates the risk characteristics of each prospective insured group, although with certain voluntary products and for certain coverages, members of a group may be underwritten on an individual basis. We generally perform our own underwriting; however, certain policies are reviewed by intermediaries under guidelines established by us. Generally, we are not obligated to accept any risk or group of risks from, or to issue a policy or group of policies to, any employer or intermediary. Requests for coverage are reviewed on their merits and generally a policy is not issued unless the particular risk or group has been examined and approved by our underwriters.

The underwriting conducted by our remote underwriting offices and intermediaries, as well as our corporate underwriting office, are subject to periodic quality assurance reviews to maintain high-standards of underwriting and consistency. Such offices are also subject to periodic external audits by reinsurers with whom we do business.

We have established senior level oversight of the underwriting process that facilitates quality sales and serves the needs of our customers, while supporting our financial strength and business objectives. Our goal is to achieve the underwriting, mortality and morbidity levels reflected in the assumptions in our product pricing. This is accomplished by determining and establishing underwriting policies, guidelines, philosophies and strategies that are competitive and suitable for the customer, the agent and us.

Subject to very few exceptions, agents in each of the distribution channels have binding authority for risks which fall within its published underwriting guidelines. Risks falling outside the underwriting guidelines may be submitted for approval to the underwriting department; alternatively, agents in such a situation may call the underwriting department to obtain authorization to bind the risk themselves. In most states, we generally have the right within a specified period (usually the first 60 days) to cancel any policy.

Pricing

Pricing reflects our corporate underwriting standards. Product pricing is based on the expected payout of benefits calculated through the use of assumptions for mortality, morbidity, expenses, persistency and investment returns, as well as certain macroeconomic factors, such as inflation. Investment-oriented products are priced based on various factors, which may include investment return, expenses, persistency and optionality. For certain investment oriented products in the U.S. and certain business sold outside the U.S., pricing may include prospective and retrospective experience rating features. Prospective experience rating involves the evaluation of past experience for the purpose of determining future premium rates and all prior year gains and losses are borne by us. Retrospective experience rating also involves the evaluation of past experience for the purpose of

4

determining the actual cost of providing insurance for the customer; however, the contract includes certain features that allow us to recoup certain losses or distribute certain gains back to the policyholder based on actual prior years’ experience.

Products offered by Corporate Benefit Funding are priced on demand. Pricing reflects expected investment returns, as well as mortality, longevity and expense assumptions appropriate for each product. This business is generally nonparticipating and illiquid, policyholders have little or no options or contractual rights to cash values.

Rates for individual life insurance products are highly regulated and must be approved by the regulators of the jurisdictions in which the product is sold. Generally such products are renewed annually and may include pricing terms that are guaranteed for a certain period of time. Fixed and variable annuity products are also highly regulated and approved by the respective regulators. Such products generally include penalties for early withdrawals and policyholder benefit elections to tailor the form of the product’s benefits to the needs of the opting policyholder. We periodically reevaluate the costs associated with such options and will periodically adjust pricing levels on our guarantees. Further, from time to time, we may also reevaluate the type and level of guarantee features currently being offered.

We continually review our underwriting and pricing guidelines so that our policies remain competitive and supportive of our marketing strategies and profitability goals.

Reinsurance Activity

We participate in reinsurance activities in order to limit losses, minimize exposure to significant risks, and provide additional capacity for future growth. We enter into various agreements with reinsurers that cover individual risks, group risks or defined blocks of business, primarily on a coinsurance, yearly renewable term, excess or catastrophe excess basis. These reinsurance agreements spread risk and minimize the effect of losses. The extent of each risk retained by us depends on our evaluation of the specific risk, subject, in certain circumstances, to maximum retention limits based on the characteristics of coverages. We also cede first dollar mortality risk under certain contracts. In addition to reinsuring mortality risk, we reinsure other risks, as well as specific coverages. We obtain reinsurance for capital requirement purposes and also when the economic impact of the reinsurance agreement makes it appropriate to do so.

Under the terms of the reinsurance agreements, the reinsurer agrees to reimburse us for the ceded amount in the event a claim is paid. Cessions under reinsurance agreements do not discharge our obligations as the primary insurer. In the event that reinsurers do not meet their obligations under the terms of the reinsurance agreements, reinsurance balances recoverable could become uncollectible.

We reinsure our business through a diversified group of well-capitalized, highly rated reinsurers for both affiliated and unaffiliated reinsurance. We analyze recent trends in arbitration and litigation outcomes in disputes, if any, with our reinsurers. We monitor ratings and evaluate the financial strength of our reinsurers by analyzing their financial statements. In addition, the reinsurance recoverable balance due from each reinsurer is evaluated as part of the overall monitoring process. Recoverability of reinsurance recoverable balances is evaluated based on these analyses. We generally secure large reinsurance recoverable balances with various forms of collateral, including secured trusts, funds withheld accounts and irrevocable letters of credit.

Retail Products

Our Retail Annuities business reinsures 100% of the living and death benefit guarantees associated with our variable annuities issued since 2006 to an affiliated reinsurer and certain portions of the living and death benefit guarantees associated with our variable annuities issued prior to 2006 to affiliated and unaffiliated reinsurers. Under these reinsurance agreements, we pay a reinsurance premium generally based on fees associated with the guarantees collected from policyholders, and receive reimbursement for benefits paid or accrued in excess of account values, subject to certain limitations. We also reinsure 90% of our new production of fixed annuities to an affiliated reinsurer.

5

For our Retail Life insurance products, we have historically reinsured the mortality risk primarily on an excess of retention basis or a quota share basis. We currently reinsure 90% of the mortality risk in excess of $1��million for most products and reinsure up to 90% of the mortality risk for certain other products. In addition to reinsuring mortality risk as described above, we reinsure other risks, as well as specific coverages. Placement of reinsurance is done primarily on an automatic basis and also on a facultative basis for risks with specified characteristics. On a case by case basis, we may retain up to $5 million per life on single life individual policies and reinsure 100% of amounts in excess of the amount we retain. We evaluate our reinsurance programs routinely and may increase or decrease our retention at any time. We also reinsure the risk associated with secondary death benefit guarantees on certain universal life insurance policies to an affiliate.

Corporate Benefit Funding

Our Corporate Benefit Funding segment has periodically engaged in reinsurance activities, as considered appropriate.

Corporate & Other

We also reinsure through 100% quota share reinsurance agreements certain run-off LTC and workers’ compensation business written by MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut.

For other policies within Corporate & Other, we generally retain most of the risk and only cede particular risks on certain client arrangements.

Catastrophe Coverage

We have exposure to catastrophes, which could contribute to significant fluctuations in our results of operations. We also use excess of retention and quota share reinsurance agreements to provide greater diversification of risk and minimize exposure to larger risks.

Reinsurance Recoverables

For information regarding ceded reinsurance recoverable balances, included in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables in the consolidated balance sheets, see Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

For purposes of this discussion, “MICC,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, a Connecticut corporation incorporated in 1863, and its subsidiaries, including MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company (“MLI-USA”). MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut is a wholly-owned subsidiary of MetLife, Inc. (“MetLife”). Management’s narrative analysis of the results of operations is presented pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(a) of Form 10-K. This narrative analysis should be read in conjunction with “Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” “Risk Factors,” and the Company’s consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.

This narrative analysis may contain or incorporate by reference information that includes or is based upon forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements give expectations or forecasts of future events. These statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, prospective services or products, future performance or results of current and anticipated services or products, sales efforts, expenses, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings, trends in operations and financial results. Any or all forward-looking statements may turn out to be wrong. Actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. See “Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

The following discussion includes references to our performance measure, operating earnings, that is not based on accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Operating earnings is the measure of segment profit or loss we use to evaluate segment performance and allocate resources. Consistent with GAAP accounting guidance for segment reporting, operating earnings is our measure of segment performance.

Operating earnings is defined as operating revenues less operating expenses, both net of income tax.

Operating revenues excludes net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses). The following additional adjustments are made to GAAP revenues, in the line items indicated, in calculating operating revenues:

• Universal life and investment-type product policy fees excludes the amortization of unearned revenue related to net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses) and certain variable annuity guaranteed minimum income benefits (“GMIB”) fees (“GMIB Fees”); and

• Net investment income: (i) includes amounts for scheduled periodic settlement payments and amortization of premium on derivatives that are hedges of investments but do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, (ii) excludes certain amounts related to contractholder-directed unit-linked investments, and (iii) excludes certain amounts related to securitization entities that are variable interest entities (“VIEs”) consolidated under GAAP.

The following adjustments are made to GAAP expenses, in the line items indicated, in calculating operating expenses:

• Policyholder benefits and claims excludes: (i) amounts associated with periodic crediting rate adjustments based on the total return of a contractually referenced pool of assets, (ii) benefits and hedging costs related to GMIBs (“GMIB Costs”), and (iii) market value adjustments associated with surrenders or terminations of contracts (“Market Value Adjustments”);

• Interest credited to policyholder account balances includes adjustments for scheduled periodic settlement payments and amortization of premium on derivatives that are hedges of policyholder account balances (“PABs”) but do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and excludes amounts related to net investment income earned on contractholder-directed unit-linked investments;

7

• Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs (“DAC”) and value of business acquired (“VOBA”) excludes amounts related to: (i) net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses), (ii) GMIB Fees and GMIB Costs, and (iii) Market Value Adjustments;

• Interest expense on debt excludes certain amounts related to securitization entities that are VIEs consolidated under GAAP; and

• Other expenses excludes costs related to implementation of new insurance regulatory requirements and business combinations.

We believe the presentation of operating earnings, as we measure it for management purposes, enhances the understanding of our performance by highlighting the results of operations and the underlying profitability drivers of our business. Operating revenues, operating expenses and operating earnings should not be viewed as substitutes for the following financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP: GAAP revenues, GAAP expenses and GAAP net income, respectively. Reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in “— Results of Operations.”

In 2011, management modified its definition of operating earnings to exclude impacts related to certain variable annuity guarantees and Market Value Adjustments to better conform to the way it manages and assesses its business. Accordingly, such results are no longer reported in operating earnings. Consequently, prior year results for Retail Products and total consolidated operating earnings have been reduced by $28 million, net of $15 million of income tax, for the year ended December 31, 2010.

In this discussion, we sometimes refer to sales activity for various products. These sales statistics do not correspond to revenues under GAAP, but are used as relevant measures of business activity.

As announced in November 2011, MetLife reorganized its business into three broad geographic regions. As a result, in the first quarter of 2012, MICC reorganized into two segments: Retail Products and Corporate Benefit Funding. In addition, the Company reports certain of its results of operations in Corporate & Other. Management continues to evaluate the Company’s segment performance and allocated resources and may adjust such measurements in the future to better reflect segment profitability. See “Business” for further information on the reorganization of the Company’s business.

Also in the first quarter of 2012, the Company adopted new guidance regarding accounting for DAC. See Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. As a result, prior period results have been revised in connection with MICC’s reorganization and the retrospective application of the first quarter 2012 adoption of new guidance regarding accounting for DAC.

Summary of Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to adopt accounting policies and make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. For a discussion of the Company’s significant accounting policies see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The most critical estimates include those used in determining:

(i) estimated fair values of investments in the absence of quoted market values;

(ii) investment impairments;

(iii) estimated fair values of freestanding derivatives and the recognition and estimated fair value of embedded derivatives requiring bifurcation;

(iv) capitalization and amortization of DAC and the establishment and amortization of VOBA;

(v) measurement of goodwill and related impairment, if any;

8

(vi) liabilities for future policyholder benefits and the accounting for reinsurance;

(vii) measurement of income taxes and the valuation of deferred tax assets; and

(viii) liabilities for litigation and regulatory matters.

In applying the Company’s accounting policies, we make subjective and complex judgments that frequently require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. Many of these policies, estimates and related judgments are common in the insurance and financial services industries; others are specific to the Company’s business and operations. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Estimated Fair Value of Investments

In determining the estimated fair value of fixed maturity securities, equity securities, investments in other securities, short-term investments, cash equivalents and mortgage loans, various methodologies, assumptions and inputs are utilized.

When quoted prices in active markets are not available, the determination of estimated fair value is based on market standard valuation methodologies, giving priority to observable inputs. The market standard valuation methodologies utilized include: discounted cash flow methodologies, matrix pricing or other similar techniques. The inputs to these market standard valuation methodologies include, but are not limited to: interest rates, credit standing of the issuer or counterparty, industry sector of the issuer, coupon rate, call provisions, sinking fund requirements, maturity, estimated duration and management’s assumptions regarding liquidity and estimated future cash flows. Accordingly, the estimated fair values are based on available market information and management’s judgments about financial instruments.

The significant inputs to the market standard valuation methodologies for certain types of securities with reasonable levels of price transparency are inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. Such observable inputs include benchmarking prices for similar assets in active, liquid markets, quoted prices in markets that are not active and observable yields and spreads in the market.

When observable inputs are not available, the market standard valuation methodologies for determining the estimated fair value of certain types of securities that trade infrequently, and therefore have little or no price transparency, rely on inputs that are significant to the estimated fair value that are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. These unobservable inputs can be based in large part on management judgment or estimation, and cannot be supported by reference to market activity. Even though unobservable, these inputs are based on assumptions deemed appropriate given the circumstances and consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing such securities.

Financial markets are susceptible to severe events evidenced by rapid depreciation in asset values accompanied by a reduction in asset liquidity. The Company’s ability to sell securities, or the price ultimately realized for these securities, depends upon the demand and liquidity in the market and increases the use of judgment in determining the estimated fair value of certain securities.

See Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the estimated fair value of investments.

Investment Impairments

One of the significant estimates related to available-for-sale securities is the evaluation of investments for impairments. The assessment of whether impairments have occurred is based on our case-by-case evaluation of the underlying reasons for the decline in estimated fair value. The Company’s review of its fixed maturity and equity securities for impairment includes an analysis of gross unrealized losses by three categories of severity and/or age of gross unrealized loss. An extended and severe unrealized loss position on a fixed maturity security may not have any impact on the ability of the issuer to service all scheduled interest and principal payments and

9

the Company’s evaluation of recoverability of all contractual cash flows or the ability to recover an amount at least equal to its amortized cost based on the present value of the expected future cash flows to be collected. In contrast, for certain equity securities, greater weight and consideration are given by the Company to a decline in estimated fair value and the likelihood such estimated fair value decline will recover.

Additionally, we consider a wide range of factors about the security issuer and use our best judgment in evaluating the cause of the decline in the estimated fair value of the security and in assessing the prospects for near-term recovery. Inherent in our evaluation of the security are assumptions and estimates about the operations of the issuer and its future earnings potential. Considerations used by the Company in the impairment evaluation process include, but are not limited to:

(i) the length of time and the extent to which the estimated fair value has been below cost or amortized cost;

(ii) the potential for impairments of securities when the issuer is experiencing significant financial difficulties;

(iii) the potential for impairments in an entire industry sector or sub-sector;

(iv) the potential for impairments in certain economically depressed geographic locations;

(v) the potential for impairments of securities where the issuer, series of issuers or industry has suffered a catastrophic type of loss or has exhausted natural resources;

(vi) with respect to fixed maturity securities, whether the Company has the intent to sell or will more likely than not be required to sell a particular security before recovery of the decline in estimated fair value below amortized cost;

(vii) with respect to equity securities, whether the Company’s ability and intent to hold a particular security for a period of time sufficient to allow for the recovery of its estimated fair value to an amount at least equal to its cost;

(viii) with respect to structured securities, changes in forecasted cash flows after considering the quality of underlying collateral; expected prepayment speeds; current and forecasted loss severity; consideration of the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security; and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security; and

(ix) other subjective factors, including concentrations and information obtained from regulators and rating agencies.

The determination of the amount of allowances and impairments on other invested asset classes is highly subjective and is based upon the Company’s periodic evaluation and assessment of known and inherent risks associated with the respective asset class. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available.

See Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information relating to investment impairments.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The determination of estimated fair value of freestanding derivatives, when quoted market values are not available, is based on market standard valuation methodologies and inputs that management believes are consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing the instruments. Derivative valuations can be affected by changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, financial indices, credit spreads, default risk, nonperformance risk, volatility, liquidity and changes in estimates and assumptions used in the pricing models. See Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details on significant inputs into the over-the-counter derivative pricing models and credit risk adjustment.

10

The Company issues certain variable annuity products with guaranteed minimum benefits, which are measured at estimated fair value separately from the host variable annuity product, with changes in estimated fair value reported in net derivative gains (losses). The estimated fair values of these embedded derivatives are determined based on the present value of projected future benefits minus the present value of projected future fees. The projections of future benefits and future fees require capital market and actuarial assumptions including expectations concerning policyholder behavior. A risk neutral valuation methodology is used under which the cash flows from the guarantees are projected under multiple capital market scenarios using observable risk free rates. The valuation of these embedded derivatives also includes an adjustment for the Company’s nonperformance risk and risk margins for non-capital market inputs. The nonperformance risk adjustment, which is captured as a spread over the risk free rate in determining the discount rate to discount the cash flows of the liability, is determined by taking into consideration publicly available information relating to spreads in the secondary market for MetLife’s debt, including related credit default swaps. These observable spreads are then adjusted, as necessary, to reflect the priority of these liabilities and the claims paying ability of the issuing insurance subsidiaries compared to MetLife. Risk margins are established to capture the non-capital market risks of the instrument which represent the additional compensation a market participant would require to assume the risks related to the uncertainties in certain actuarial assumptions. The establishment of risk margins requires the use of significant management judgment, including assumptions of the amount and cost of capital needed to cover the guarantees.

As part of its regular review of critical accounting estimates, the Company periodically assesses inputs for estimating nonperformance risk in fair value measurements. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company completed a study that aggregated and evaluated data, including historical recovery rates of insurance companies, as well as policyholder behavior observed during the recent financial crisis. As a result, at the end of the second quarter of 2010, the Company refined the manner in which its insurance subsidiaries incorporate expected recovery rates into the nonperformance risk adjustment for purposes of estimating the fair value of investment-type contracts and embedded derivatives within insurance contracts. The refinement impacted the Company’s net income, with no effect on operating earnings.

The accounting for derivatives is complex and interpretations of accounting standards continue to evolve in practice. If it is determined that hedge accounting designations were not appropriately applied, reported net income could be materially affected. Differences in judgment as to the availability and application of hedge accounting designations and the appropriate accounting treatment may result in a differing impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Company from that previously reported. Assessments of hedge effectiveness and measurements of ineffectiveness of hedging relationships are also subject to interpretations and estimations and different interpretations or estimates may have a material effect on the amount reported in net income.

Variable annuities with guaranteed minimum benefits may be more costly than expected in volatile or declining equity markets. Market conditions including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates, equity indices, market volatility and foreign currency exchange rates, changes in the Company’s nonperformance risk, variations in actuarial assumptions regarding policyholder behavior, mortality and risk margins related to non-capital market inputs may result in significant fluctuations in the estimated fair value of the guarantees that could materially affect net income. If interpretations change, there is a risk that features previously not bifurcated may require bifurcation and reporting at estimated fair value in the consolidated financial statements and respective changes in estimated fair value could materially affect net income.

Additionally, the Company ceded the risk associated with certain of the variable annuities with guaranteed minimum benefits described in the preceding paragraphs to an affiliated reinsurance company. The value of the embedded derivatives on the ceded risk is determined using a methodology consistent with that described previously for the guarantees directly written by the Company with the exception of the input for nonperformance risk that reflects the credit of the reinsurer. Because certain of the direct guarantees do not meet the definition of an embedded derivative and, thus are not accounted for at fair value, significant fluctuations in net income may occur since the change in fair value of the embedded derivative on the ceded risk is being

11

recorded in net income without a corresponding and offsetting change in fair value of the direct guarantee. See Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company’s derivatives and hedging programs.

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Value of Business Acquired

The Company incurs significant costs in connection with acquiring new and renewal insurance business. Costs that relate directly to the successful acquisition or renewal of insurance contracts are deferred as DAC. In addition to commissions and other direct costs, deferrable costs include the portion of an employee’s total compensation and benefits related to time spent selling, underwriting or processing the issuance of new and renewal insurance business only with respect to actual policies acquired or renewed. The Company utilizes various techniques to estimate the portion of an employee’s time spent on qualifying acquisition activities that result in actual sales, including surveys, interviews, representative time studies and other methods. These estimates include assumptions that are reviewed and updated on a periodic basis or more frequently to reflect significant changes in processes or distribution methods.

VOBA represents the excess of book value over the estimated fair value of acquired insurance, annuity and investment-type contracts in-force at the acquisition date. The estimated fair value of the acquired liabilities is based on actuarially determined projections, by each block of business, of future policy and contract charges, premiums, mortality and morbidity, separate account performance, surrenders, operating expenses, investment returns, nonperformance risk adjustment and other factors. Actual experience on the purchased business may vary from these projections. The recovery of DAC and VOBA is dependent upon the future profitability of the related business.

Separate account rates of return on variable universal life contracts and variable deferred annuity contracts affect in-force account balances on such contracts each reporting period which can result in significant fluctuations in amortization of DAC and VOBA. The Company’s practice to determine the impact of gross profits resulting from returns on separate accounts assumes that long-term appreciation in equity markets is not changed by short-term market fluctuations, but is only changed when sustained interim deviations are expected. The Company monitors these events and only changes the assumption when its long-term expectation changes. The effect of an increase/(decrease) by 100 basis points in the assumed future rate of return is reasonably likely to result in a decrease/(increase) in the DAC and VOBA amortization of approximately $63 million with an offset to the Company’s unearned revenue liability of approximately $1 million for this factor.

The Company also periodically reviews other long-term assumptions underlying the projections of estimated gross margins and profits. These include investment returns, policyholder dividend scales, interest crediting rates, mortality, persistency, and expenses to administer business. Assumptions used in the calculation of estimated gross margins and profits which may have significantly changed are updated annually. If the update of assumptions causes expected future gross margins and profits to increase, DAC and VOBA amortization will decrease, resulting in a current period increase to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the assumption update causes expected future gross margins and profits to decrease.

The Company’s most significant assumption updates resulting in a change to expected future gross margins and profits and the amortization of DAC and VOBA are due to revisions to expected future investment returns, expenses, in-force or persistency assumptions, variable and universal life contracts and annuity contracts. During 2011, the amount of net investment gains (losses), as well as the assumption updates associated with future policyholder behavior and the separate account rate of returns also resulted in significant changes to actual and expected future gross profits impacting amortization of DAC and VOBA. The Company expects these assumptions to be the ones most reasonably likely to cause significant changes in the future. Changes in these assumptions can be offsetting and the Company is unable to predict their movement or offsetting impact over time.

Goodwill

Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances, such as adverse changes in the business climate, indicate that there may be justification for conducting an interim test.

12

For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill is compared to the carrying value of that goodwill to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. In such instances, the implied fair value of the goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill that would be determined in a business acquisition. The key inputs, judgments and assumptions necessary in determining estimated fair value of the reporting units include projected operating earnings, current book value (with or without accumulated other comprehensive income), the level of economic capital required to support the mix of business, long-term growth rates, comparative market multiples, the account value of in-force business, projections of new and renewal business, as well as margins on such business, the level of interest rates, credit spreads, equity market levels, and the discount rate that we believe is appropriate for the respective reporting unit. The estimated fair values of annuities and life reporting units are particularly sensitive to the equity market levels.

We apply significant judgment when determining the estimated fair value of our reporting units. The valuation methodologies utilized are subject to key judgments and assumptions that are sensitive to change. Estimates of fair value are inherently uncertain and represent only management’s reasonable expectation regarding future developments. These estimates and the judgments and assumptions upon which the estimates are based will, in all likelihood, differ in some respects from actual future results. Declines in the estimated fair value of our reporting units could result in goodwill impairments in future periods which could materially adversely affect our results of operations or financial position.

On an ongoing basis, we evaluate potential triggering events that may affect the estimated fair value of our reporting units to assess whether any goodwill impairment exists.

In the first quarter of 2012, MetLife began reporting its results in three broad geographic regions. As a result, the Company’s reporting structure has changed, as well as the composition of certain of its reporting units.

See Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company’s goodwill.

Liability for Future Policy Benefits

Generally, future policy benefits are payable over an extended period of time and related liabilities are calculated as the present value of future expected benefits to be paid reduced by the present value of future expected premiums. Such liabilities are established based on methods and underlying assumptions in accordance with GAAP and applicable actuarial standards. Principal assumptions used in the establishment of liabilities for future policy benefits are mortality, morbidity, policy lapse, renewal, retirement, disability incidence, disability terminations, investment returns, inflation, expenses and other contingent events as appropriate to the respective product type. These assumptions are established at the time the policy is issued and are intended to estimate the experience for the period the policy benefits are payable. Utilizing these assumptions, liabilities are established on a block of business basis. If experience is less favorable than assumed, additional liabilities may be established, resulting in a charge to policyholder benefits and claims.

Future policy benefit liabilities for disabled lives are estimated using the present value of benefits method and experience assumptions as to claim terminations, expenses and interest.

Liabilities for unpaid claims are estimated based upon the Company’s historical experience and other actuarial assumptions that consider the effects of current developments, anticipated trends and risk management programs. With respect to workers’ compensation insurance, such unpaid claims are reduced for anticipated subrogation.

Future policy benefit liabilities for minimum death and income benefit guarantees relating to certain annuity contracts are based on estimates of the expected value of benefits in excess of the projected account balance, recognizing the excess ratably over the accumulation period based on total expected assessments. Liabilities for universal and variable life secondary guarantees are determined by estimating the expected value of death benefits payable when the account balance is projected to be zero and recognizing those benefits ratably over the

13

accumulation period based on total expected assessments. The assumptions used in estimating the secondary guarantee liabilities are consistent with those used for amortizing DAC, and are thus subject to the same variability and risk.

The Company periodically reviews its estimates of actuarial liabilities for future policy benefits and compares them with its actual experience. Differences between actual experience and the assumptions used in pricing these policies and guarantees, as well as in the establishment of the related liabilities, result in variances in profit and could result in losses.

See Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company’s liability for future policy benefits.

Reinsurance

Accounting for reinsurance requires extensive use of assumptions and estimates, particularly related to the future performance of the underlying business and the potential impact of counterparty credit risks. The Company periodically reviews actual and anticipated experience compared to the aforementioned assumptions used to establish assets and liabilities relating to ceded and assumed reinsurance and evaluates the financial strength of counterparties to its reinsurance agreements using criteria similar to that evaluated in the security impairment process discussed previously. Additionally, for each of its reinsurance agreements, the Company determines whether the agreement provides indemnification against loss or liability relating to insurance risk, in accordance with applicable accounting standards. The Company reviews all contractual features, particularly those that may limit the amount of insurance risk to which the reinsurer is subject or features that delay the timely reimbursement of claims. If the Company determines that a reinsurance agreement does not expose the reinsurer to a reasonable possibility of a significant loss from insurance risk, the Company records the agreement using the deposit method of accounting.

See Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company’s reinsurance programs.

Income Taxes

The Company provides for federal, state and foreign income taxes currently payable, as well as those deferred due to temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company’s accounting for income taxes represents management’s best estimate of various events and transactions. These tax laws are complex and are subject to differing interpretations by the taxpayer and the relevant governmental taxing authorities. In establishing a provision for income tax expense, we must make judgments and interpretations about the application of these inherently complex tax laws. We must also make estimates about when in the future certain items will affect taxable income in the various tax jurisdictions, both domestic and foreign.

The realization of deferred tax assets depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carryback or carryforward periods under the tax law in the applicable tax jurisdiction. Valuation allowances are established when management determines, based on available information, that it is more likely than not that deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Factors in management’s determination include the performance of the business and its ability to generate capital gains. Significant judgment is required in determining whether valuation allowances should be established, as well as the amount of such allowances. When making such determination, consideration is given to, among other things, the following:

(i)   future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards;

(ii)  future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences;

(iii) taxable income in prior carryback years; and

(iv) tax planning strategies.

Disputes over interpretations of the tax laws may be subject to review and adjudication by the court systems of the various tax jurisdictions or may be settled with the taxing authority upon audit. The Company determines

14

whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities before any part of the benefit is recorded in the financial statements. The Company may be required to change its provision for income taxes when estimates used in determining valuation allowances on deferred tax assets significantly change, or when receipt of new information indicates the need for adjustment in valuation allowances. Additionally, future events, such as changes in tax laws, tax regulations, or interpretations of such laws or regulations, could have an impact on the provision for income tax and the effective tax rate. Any such changes could significantly affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements in the year these changes occur.

See Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company’s income taxes.

Litigation Contingencies

The Company is a party to a number of legal actions and is involved in a number of regulatory investigations. Given the inherent unpredictability of these matters, it is difficult to estimate the impact on the Company’s financial position. Liabilities are established when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. On a quarterly and annual basis, the Company reviews relevant information with respect to liabilities for litigation, regulatory investigations and litigation-related contingencies to be reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. It is possible that an adverse outcome in certain of the Company’s litigation and regulatory investigations, or the use of different assumptions in the determination of amounts recorded, could have a material effect upon the Company’s consolidated net income or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.

See Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Company’s assessment of litigation contingencies.

15

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared with the Year Ended December 31, 2010

Consolidated Results

We have experienced growth and an increase in market share in several of our businesses which positively impacted our results, most significantly through higher policy fee income. Sales of our annuity products were up 71% compared to the prior year, primarily as a result of an increase in variable annuity sales, driven by the introduction of a new higher benefit, lower-risk variable annuity rider. We also benefited from increased issuances of funding agreements in the second quarter of 2011. Our pension closeout sales in the United Kingdom were strong as we continue to penetrate the market, with a premium increase of $424 million before income tax. While the premium for this business is almost entirely offset by the related change in policyholder benefits, the favorable results contribute to the growth in our investment portfolio. We also continue to experience growth in our variable, universal and term life businesses.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			Change			% Change
	(In millions)
Revenues
Premiums	$	1,828		$	1,067		$	761			71.3%
Universal life and investment-type product policy fees		1,956			1,639			317			19.3%
Net investment income		3,074			3,153			(79	)		(2.5)%
Other revenues		508			503			5			1.0%
Net investment gains (losses)		35			150			(115	)		(76.7)%
Net derivative gains (losses)		1,119			58			1,061
Total revenues		8,520			6,570			1,950			29.7%
Expenses
Policyholder benefits and claims		2,660			1,905			755			39.6%
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		1,189			1,271			(82	)		(6.5)%
Capitalization of DAC		(1,342	)		(858	)		(484	)		(56.4)%
Amortization of DAC and VOBA		1,156			770			386			50.1%
Interest expense on debt		389			472			(83	)		(17.6)%
Other expenses		2,712			1,988			724			36.4%
Total expenses		6,764			5,548			1,216			21.9%
Income (loss) before provision for income tax		1,756			1,022			734			71.8%
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)		523			303			220			72.6%
Net income	$	1,233		$	719		$	514			71.5%

Unless otherwise stated, all amounts discussed below are net of income tax.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, net income increased $514 million to $1.2 billion primarily driven by a favorable change in net derivative gains (losses), net of related adjustments principally associated with DAC and VOBA amortization, and an increase in operating earnings.

We manage our investment portfolio using disciplined asset/liability management (“ALM”) principles, focusing on cash flow and duration to support our current and future liabilities. Our intent is to match the timing and amount of liability cash outflows with invested assets that have cash inflows of comparable timing and amount, while optimizing, net of income tax, risk-adjusted net investment income and risk-adjusted total return. Our investment portfolio is heavily weighted toward fixed income investments, with over 80% of our portfolio invested in fixed maturity securities and mortgage loans. These securities and loans have varying maturities and other characteristics which cause them to be generally well suited for matching the cash flow and duration of

16

insurance liabilities. Other invested asset classes including, but not limited to, equity securities, other limited partnership interests and real estate and real estate joint ventures, provide additional diversification and opportunity for long-term yield enhancement in addition to supporting the cash flow and duration objectives of our investment portfolio. We also use derivatives as an integral part of our management of the investment portfolio to hedge certain risks, including changes in interest rates, foreign currencies, credit spreads and equity market levels. Additional considerations for our investment portfolio include current and expected market conditions and expectations for changes within our specific mix of products and business segments. In addition, the general account investment portfolio includes, within other securities, contractholder-directed investments supporting unit-linked variable annuity type liabilities, which do not qualify as separate account assets. The returns on these contractholder-directed investments, which can vary significantly period to period, include changes in estimated fair value subsequent to purchase, inure to contractholders and are offset in earnings by a corresponding change in PABs through interest credited to policyholder account balances.

The composition of the investment portfolio of each business segment is tailored to the specific characteristics of its insurance liabilities, causing certain portfolios to be shorter in duration and others to be longer in duration. Accordingly, certain portfolios are more heavily weighted in longer duration, higher yielding fixed maturity securities, or certain sub-sectors of fixed maturity securities, than other portfolios.

Investments are purchased to support our insurance liabilities and not to generate net investment gains and losses. However, net investment gains and losses are incurred and can change significantly from period to period due to changes in external influences, including changes in market factors such as interest rates, foreign currencies, credit spreads and equity markets; counterparty specific factors such as financial performance, credit rating and collateral valuation; and internal factors such as portfolio rebalancing. Changes in these factors from period to period can significantly impact the levels of both impairments and realized gains and losses on investments sold.

We use freestanding equity, interest rate, currency and credit derivatives to provide economic hedges of certain invested assets and insurance liabilities, including embedded derivatives, within certain of our variable annuity minimum benefit guarantees. For those hedges not designated as accounting hedges, changes in market factors can lead to the recognition of fair value changes in net derivative gains (losses) without an offsetting gain or loss recognized in earnings for the item being hedged even though these are effective economic hedges. Additionally, we issue liabilities and purchase assets that contain embedded derivatives whose changes in estimated fair value are sensitive to changes in market factors and are also recognized in net derivative gains (losses).

The favorable change in net derivative gains (losses) of $689 million, from gains of $38 million in 2010 to gains of $727 million in 2011, was primarily driven by a favorable change in freestanding derivatives of $597 million and a favorable change in embedded derivatives of $92 million primarily associated with variable annuity minimum benefit guarantees. The $597 million favorable change in freestanding derivatives was primarily attributable to the impact of falling long-term and mid-term interest rates, equity market movements and volatility, and currency exchange rate movements. Long-term and mid-term interest rates fell more in 2011 than in 2010, which had a positive impact of $465 million on our interest rate derivatives, $115 million of which was attributable to hedges of variable annuity minimum benefit guarantee liabilities that are accounted for as embedded derivatives. The impact of equity market movements and equity volatility in 2011 compared to 2010 had a positive impact of $75 million on our equity derivatives, which was primarily attributable to hedges of variable annuity minimum benefit guarantee liabilities that are accounted for as embedded derivatives. Foreign currency derivatives had a positive impact of $48 million related to hedges of foreign currency exposures.

Certain variable annuity products with minimum benefit guarantees contain embedded derivatives that are measured at estimated fair value separately from the host variable annuity contract with changes in estimated fair value recorded in net derivative gains (losses). The fair value of these embedded derivatives also includes an adjustment for nonperformance risk, which is unhedged. The $92 million favorable change in embedded derivatives was primarily attributable to a favorable change in ceded affiliated reinsurance assets of $1.2 billion

17

and a favorable change in the adjustment for nonperformance risk of $315 million on direct liabilities, partially offset by an unfavorable change in market factors on direct liabilities of $850 million, an unfavorable change in the adjustment for the reinsurer’s nonperformance risk of $436 million and an unfavorable change in other unhedged non-market risks of $182 million on the direct liabilities. The aforementioned $315 million favorable change in the adjustment for nonperformance risk was net of a prior period loss of $256 million relating to a refinement in estimating the spreads used in the adjustment for nonperformance risk. The aforementioned unfavorable change in the adjustment for the reinsurer’s nonperformance risk of $436 million was net of a prior period gain of $380 million relating to a refinement in estimating the spreads used in the adjustment for nonperformance risk.

The unfavorable change in net investment gains of $75 million was primarily due to foreign currency transaction losses on unhedged foreign denominated guaranteed investment contracts, realized losses on sales of equity securities and increased impairments and decreased realized gains on sales of fixed maturity securities, partially offset by a reduction in the non-specific mortgage valuation allowance reflecting improving real estate market fundamentals.

Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $523 million, or 30% of income (loss) before provision for income tax, compared with $303 million, or 30% of income (loss) before provision for income tax, for 2010. The Company’s 2011 and 2010 effective tax rates differ from the U.S. statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the impact of certain permanent tax differences, including non-taxable investment income and tax credits for investments in low income housing, in relation to income (loss) before provision for income tax.

As more fully described in the discussion of performance measures above, we use operating earnings, which does not equate to net income, as determined in accordance with GAAP, to analyze our performance, evaluate segment performance, and allocate resources. We believe that the presentation of operating earnings, as we measure it for management purposes, enhances the understanding of our performance by highlighting the results of operations and the underlying profitability drivers of the business. Operating earnings should not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP net income. Operating earnings increased $125 million to $753 million in 2011 from $628 million in 2010.

Reconciliation of net income to operating earnings

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Net income	$	1,233	$	719
Less: Net investment gains (losses)		35		150
Less: Net derivative gains (losses)		1,119		58
Less: Other adjustments to net income (1)		(428)		(68)
Less: Provision for income tax (expense) benefit		(246)		(49)
Operating earnings	$	753	$	628

(1) See definitions of operating revenues and operating expenses for the components of such adjustments.

18

Reconciliation of GAAP revenues to operating revenues and GAAP expenses to operating expenses

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Total revenues	$	8,520	$	6,570
Less: Net investment gains (losses)		35		150
Less: Net derivative gains (losses)		1,119		58
Less: Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses)		11		(1)
Less: Other adjustments to revenues (1)		406		510
Total operating revenues	$	6,949	$	5,853
Total expenses	$	6,764	$	5,548
Less: Adjustments related to net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses)		368		74
Less: Other adjustments to expenses (1)		477		503
Total operating expenses	$	5,919	$	4,971

(1) See definitions of operating revenues and operating expenses for the components of such adjustments.

Consolidated Results – Operating

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		Change		% Change
	(In millions)
OPERATING REVENUES
Premiums	$	1,828	$	1,067	$	761		71.3%
Universal life and investment-type product policy fees		1,834		1,553		281		18.1%
Net investment income		2,779		2,730		49		1.8%
Other revenues		508		503		5		1.0%
Total operating revenues		6,949		5,853		1,096		18.7%
OPERATING EXPENSES
Policyholder benefits and claims		2,540		1,830		710		38.8%
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		1,168		1,243		(75)		(6.0)%
Capitalization of DAC		(1,342)		(858)		(484)		(56.4)%
Amortization of DAC and VOBA		798		698		100		14.3%
Interest expense on debt		67		70		(3)		(4.3)%
Other expenses		2,688		1,988		700		35.2%
Total operating expenses		5,919		4,971		948		19.1%
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)		277		254		23		9.1%
Operating earnings	$	753	$	628	$	125		19.9%

Unless otherwise stated, all amounts discussed below are net of income tax.

The $125 million increase in operating earnings was driven by growth in most of our businesses which increased our policy fees and investment income partially offset by increased expenses.

Strong sales in 2011 increased operating earnings by $261 million. Positive net cash flows generated from the majority of our businesses were the primary drivers of increases in both invested assets and separate account assets. Policy fee income increased $173 million, primarily from our annuity business. In our variable annuity

19

products, policy fees are calculated as a percentage of the average assets in separate accounts. Invested asset growth generated higher investment earnings of $113 million. Most of our businesses experienced growth in their in-force business which increased insurance liabilities and resulted in higher interest credited on long-duration contracts and on our PABs, decreasing operating earnings by $26 million. In addition, strong sales were the primary drivers of a $22 million increase in operating earnings in our term life business. Growth in our annuity business was the most significant contributor of the $336 million increase in variable expenses, such as commissions, premium taxes and other volume-related costs associated with sales activity, the majority of which was offset by an increase in related DAC capitalization of $315 million.

In 2011, interest rate markets declined while equity markets remained relatively flat compared to much stronger 2010 equity market performance. These factors contributed to a $79 million net decrease in operating earnings. Increased average separate account balances were driven primarily by increased variable annuity net cash flows and favorable equity market performance in 2010 and 2011. Increased policy fees and other revenues attributable to market performance resulted in a $52 million operating earnings increase, most notably in our annuity products. Operating earnings also increased $29 million primarily driven by lower average crediting rates on annuity fixed rate funds, as a result of declining interest rate markets. More than offsetting these favorable results was a $18 million decrease in investment earnings due to lower yields and an increase in certain expenses. DAC, VOBA and deferred sales inducements (“DSI”) amortization and certain insurance-related liabilities are sensitive to market fluctuations, which was the primary driver of higher expenses in these categories. In particular, the less favorable 2011 investment markets caused an acceleration of DAC and DSI amortization. In our annuity products, DAC and DSI amortization increased $83 million, net of assumption updates, partially offset by a decrease of $11 million in our individual life products. Additionally, higher market driven expenses of $70 million, such as letter of credit fees, contributed to a decrease in operating earnings.

On an annual basis, we perform experience studies as well as update our assumptions surrounding both expected policyholder behaviors and the related investment environment. These updates, commonly known as unlocking events, result in changes to certain insurance related liabilities, DAC and revenue amortization. The impact of our updates to the assumptions, primarily related to policyholder behaviors, and the related investment environment, coupled with insurance related refinements, in both 2011 and 2010, resulted in a net decrease to operating earnings of $30 million in the current year.

We benefited from a higher income tax benefit of $29 million over the 2010 period, primarily due to a higher utilization of tax-preferenced investments which provided tax credits and deductions. The positive resolution of certain legal matters in 2010 decreased operating earnings by $27 million in 2011. The Company also incurred $11 million of expenses related to a liquidation plan filed by the New York State Department of Financial Services for Executive Life Insurance Company of New York in the third quarter of 2011.

20

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		22
Financial Statements at December 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009:
Consolidated Balance Sheets		23
Consolidated Statements of Operations		24
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income		25
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity		26
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		27
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements		28
Financial Statement Schedules at December 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009:
Schedule I — Consolidated Summary of Investments — Other Than Investments in Related Parties		151
Schedule II — Condensed Financial Information of Registrant		152
Schedule III — Consolidated Supplementary Insurance Information		156
Schedule IV — Consolidated Reinsurance		158

21

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 1, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively adjusted for the Company’s adoption of guidance relating to the presentation of comprehensive income, a change in accounting for costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts, and the reorganization of the Company’s segments. In addition, as discussed in Note 1, the Company changed its method of accounting for the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairment losses for certain investments as required by accounting guidance adopted on April 1, 2009.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

New York, New York

March 22, 2012

(except with respect to our opinion on the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules insofar as it relates to the effects of the retrospective application of accounting guidance adopted on January 1, 2012, relating to comprehensive income, the accounting for costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts, and the reorganization of the Company’s segments, described in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements, and the subsequent events described in Note 16, as to which the date is May 31, 2012)

22

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(In millions, except share and per share data)

	2011		2010
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value (amortized cost: $44,215 and $44,132, respectively)	$	47,781	$	44,924
Equity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value (cost: $295 and $427, respectively)		252		405
Other securities, at estimated fair value		3,665		2,247
Mortgage loans (net of valuation allowances of $61 and $87, respectively; includes $3,138 and $6,840, respectively, at estimated fair value, relating to variable interest entities)		9,800		12,730
Policy loans		1,203		1,190
Real estate and real estate joint ventures		503		501
Other limited partnership interests		1,696		1,538
Short-term investments, principally at estimated fair value		2,578		1,235
Other invested assets, principally at estimated fair value		3,354		1,707
Total investments		70,832		66,477
Cash and cash equivalents, principally at estimated fair value		745		1,928
Accrued investment income (includes $14 and $31, respectively, relating to variable interest entities)		568		559
Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables		20,223		17,008
Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired		4,188		4,391
Current income tax recoverable		140		38
Deferred income tax assets		—		601
Goodwill		953		953
Other assets		856		839
Separate account assets		72,559		61,619
Total assets	$	171,064	$	154,413
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Future policy benefits	$	25,483	$	23,198
Policyholder account balances		42,075		39,291
Other policy-related balances		2,989		2,652
Payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions		8,079		8,103
Long-term debt (includes $3,065 and $6,773, respectively, at estimated fair value, relating to variable interest entities)		3,857		7,568
Deferred income tax liability		935		—
Other liabilities (includes $14 and $31, respectively, relating to variable interest entities)		5,384		4,503
Separate account liabilities		72,559		61,619
Total liabilities		161,361		146,934
Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees (Note 11)
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, par value $2.50 per share; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 34,595,317 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010		86		86
Additional paid-in capital		6,673		6,719
Retained earnings		1,173		457
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		1,771		217
Total stockholders’ equity		9,703		7,479
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	171,064	$	154,413

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

23

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

(In millions)

	2011		2010		2009
Revenues
Premiums	$	1,828	$	1,067	$	1,312
Universal life and investment-type product policy fees		1,956		1,639		1,380
Net investment income		3,074		3,153		2,333
Other revenues		508		503		598
Net investment gains (losses):
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities		(42)		(103)		(552)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities transferred to other comprehensive income (loss)		(5)		53		165
Other net investment gains (losses)		82		200		(448)
Total net investment gains (losses)		35		150		(835)
Net derivative gains (losses)		1,119		58		(1,031)
Total revenues		8,520		6,570		3,757
Expenses
Policyholder benefits and claims		2,660		1,905		2,065
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		1,189		1,271		1,301
Other expenses		2,915		2,372		1,334
Total expenses		6,764		5,548		4,700
Income (loss) before provision for income tax		1,756		1,022		(943)
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)		523		303		(411)
Net income (loss)	$	1,233	$	719	$	(532)

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

24

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

For the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

(In millions)

	2011		2010		2009
Net income (loss)	$	1,233	$	719	$	(532)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized investment gains (losses), net of related offsets		2,074		1,619		3,157
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments		347		(107)		(21)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(16)		(17)		45
Other comprehensive income (loss), before income tax		2,405		1,495		3,181
Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income (loss)		(851)		(523)		(1,095)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax		1,554		972		2,086
Comprehensive income (loss) excluding cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		2,787		1,691		1,554
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of income tax		—		34		(39)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	2,787	$	1,725	$	1,515

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

25

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

For the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

(In millions)

	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)									Total Equity
									Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses)			Other-Than- Temporary Impairments			Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
Balance at December 31, 2008	$	86	$	6,719		$	965		$	(2,682	)	$	—		$	(154	)	$	4,934
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of income tax (Note 1)							(353	)		(17	)								(370	)
Balance at January 1, 2009		86		6,719			612			(2,699	)		—			(154	)		4,564
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of income tax (Note 1)							22						(22	)					—
Net loss							(532	)											(532	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax										2,102			(61	)		45			2,086
Balance at December 31, 2009		86		6,719			102			(597	)		(83	)		(109	)		6,118
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of income tax (Note 1)							(34	)		23			11						—
Balance at January 1, 2010		86		6,719			68			(574	)		(72	)		(109	)		6,118
Dividend paid to MetLife							(330	)											(330	)
Net income							719												719
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax										967			21			(16	)		972
Balance at December 31, 2010		86		6,719			457			393			(51	)		(125	)		7,479
Dividend paid to MetLife							(517	)											(517	)
Capital contribution				1															1
Return of capital (Note 12)				(47	)														(47	)
Net income							1,233												1,233
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax										1,591			(23	)		(14	)		1,554
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	86	$	6,673		$	1,173		$	1,984		$	(74	)	$	(139	)	$	9,703

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

26

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

(In millions)

	2011			2010			2009
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	1,233		$	719		$	(532)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expenses		37			41			29
Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts associated with investments, net		(152	)		(259	)		(198	)
(Gains) losses on investments and derivatives and from sales of businesses, net		(1,183	)		(300	)		1,866
(Income) loss from equity method investments, net of dividends or distributions		(23	)		(39	)		130
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		1,189			1,271			1,301
Universal life and investment-type product policy fees		(1,956	)		(1,639	)		(1,380	)
Change in other securities		(1,483	)		(1,199	)		(597	)
Change in accrued investment income		51			31			(29	)
Change in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables		(1,288	)		(3,284	)		(2,307	)
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs, net		(187	)		(87	)		(432	)
Change in income tax recoverable (payable)		567			191			(346	)
Change in other assets		1,386			1,041			449
Change in insurance-related liabilities and policy-related balances		2,307			1,952			1,648
Change in other liabilities		406			2,072			(166	)
Other, net		30			3			—
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		934			514			(564	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Sales, maturities and repayments of:
Fixed maturity securities		17,348			17,748			13,076
Equity securities		168			131			141
Mortgage loans		993			964			444
Real estate and real estate joint ventures		26			18			4
Other limited partnership interests		256			123			142
Purchases of:
Fixed maturity securities		(17,439	)		(19,342	)		(16,192	)
Equity securities		(27	)		(39	)		(74	)
Mortgage loans		(1,357	)		(1,468	)		(783	)
Real estate and real estate joint ventures		(72	)		(117	)		(31	)
Other limited partnership interests		(378	)		(363	)		(203	)
Cash received in connection with freestanding derivatives		397			97			239
Cash paid in connection with freestanding derivatives		(478	)		(155	)		(449	)
Issuances of loans to affiliates		(430	)		—			—
Net change in policy loans		(13	)		(1	)		3
Net change in short-term investments		(1,347	)		554			1,445
Net change in other invested assets		(12	)		(190	)		18
Other, net		1			—			(2	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(2,364	)		(2,040	)		(2,222	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Policyholder account balances:
Deposits		20,496			24,910			20,783
Withdrawals		(19,404	)		(23,700	)		(20,067	)
Net change in payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions		(24	)		934			(702	)
Net change in short-term debt		—			—			(300	)
Long-term debt repaid		(385	)		(878	)		—
Financing element on certain derivative instruments		129			(44	)		(53	)
Return of capital		(47	)		—			—
Dividends on common stock		(517	)		(330	)		—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		248			892			(339	)
Effect of change in foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents balances		(1	)		(12	)		43
Change in cash and cash equivalents		(1,183	)		(646	)		(3,082	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		1,928			2,574			5,656
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	745		$	1,928		$	2,574
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Net cash paid (received) during the year for:
Interest	$	406		$	479		$	73
Income tax	$	(47	)	$	122		$	(63	)
Non-cash transactions during the year:
Real estate and real estate joint ventures acquired in satisfaction of debt	$	5		$	28		$	—
Long-term debt issued in exchange for certain other invested assets	$	—		$	45		$	—

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

27

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business

“MICC” or the “Company” refers to MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, a Connecticut corporation incorporated in 1863, and its subsidiaries, including MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company (“MLI-USA”). MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut is a subsidiary of MetLife, Inc. (“MetLife”). The Company offers individual annuities, individual life insurance, and institutional protection and asset accumulation products.

The Company is organized into two segments: Retail Products and Corporate Benefit Funding. See Note 14 for further information on the reorganization of the Company’s segments in the first quarter of 2012, which was retrospectively applied.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and its subsidiaries, as well as partnerships and joint ventures in which the Company has control, and variable interest entities (“VIEs”) for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. See “— Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements.” Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Certain amounts in the prior years’ consolidated financial statements and related footnotes thereto have been reclassified to conform with the 2011 presentation as discussed throughout the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. See “— Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements” for discussion of adoptions in 2012, which were retrospectively applied.

Since the Company is a member of a controlled group of affiliated companies, its results may not be indicative of those of a stand-alone entity.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to adopt accounting policies and make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements.

A description of critical estimates is incorporated within the discussion of the related accounting policies which follows. In applying these policies, management makes subjective and complex judgments that frequently require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. Many of these policies, estimates and related judgments are common in the insurance and financial services industries; others are specific to the Company’s business and operations. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Investments

The accounting policies for the Company’s principal investments are as follows:

Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities.  The Company’s fixed maturity and equity securities are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at their estimated fair value.

Unrealized investment gains and losses on these securities are recorded as a separate component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of policyholder-related amounts and deferred income taxes. All security transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Investment gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on a specific identification basis.

28

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Interest income on fixed maturity securities is recorded when earned using an effective yield method giving effect to amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Dividends on equity securities are recorded when declared. Interest, dividends and prepayment fees are recorded in net investment income.

Included within fixed maturity securities are structured securities including mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities (“ABS”). Amortization of the premium or discount considers the estimated timing and amount of prepayments of the underlying loans. Actual prepayment experience is periodically reviewed and effective yields are recalculated when differences arise between the originally anticipated and the actual prepayments received and currently anticipated. Prepayment assumptions for single class and multi-class mortgage-backed and ABS are estimated by management using inputs obtained from third-party specialists, including broker-dealers, and based on management’s knowledge of the current market. For credit-sensitive mortgage-backed and ABS and certain prepayment-sensitive securities, the effective yield is recalculated on a prospective basis. For all other mortgage-backed and ABS, the effective yield is recalculated on a retrospective basis.

The Company periodically evaluates fixed maturity and equity securities for impairment. The assessment of whether impairments have occurred is based on management’s case-by-case evaluation of the underlying reasons for the decline in estimated fair value. The Company’s review of its fixed maturity and equity securities for impairments includes an analysis of the total gross unrealized losses by three categories of severity and/or age of the gross unrealized loss, as summarized in Note 2 “— Aging of Gross Unrealized Loss and OTTI Loss for Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Available-for-Sale.”

Management considers a wide range of factors about the security issuer and uses its best judgment in evaluating the cause of the decline in the estimated fair value of the security and in assessing the prospects for near-term recovery. Inherent in management’s evaluation of the security are assumptions and estimates about the operations of the issuer and its future earnings potential. Considerations used by the Company in the impairment evaluation process include, but are not limited to: (i) the length of time and the extent to which the estimated fair value has been below cost or amortized cost; (ii) the potential for impairments of securities when the issuer is experiencing significant financial difficulties; (iii) the potential for impairments in an entire industry sector or sub-sector; (iv) the potential for impairments in certain economically depressed geographic locations; (v) the potential for impairments of securities where the issuer, series of issuers or industry has suffered a catastrophic type of loss or has exhausted natural resources; (vi) with respect to fixed maturity securities, whether the Company has the intent to sell or will more likely than not be required to sell a particular security before the decline in estimated fair value below amortized cost recovers; (vii) with respect to structured securities, changes in forecasted cash flows after considering the quality of underlying collateral; expected prepayment speeds; current and forecasted loss severity; consideration of the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security; and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security; and (viii) other subjective factors, including concentrations and information obtained from regulators and rating agencies.

For fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position, an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) is recognized in earnings when it is anticipated that the amortized cost will not be recovered. In such situations, the OTTI recognized in earnings is the entire difference between the fixed maturity security’s amortized cost and its estimated fair value only when either: (i) the Company has the intent to sell the fixed maturity security; or (ii) it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the fixed maturity security before recovery of the decline in estimated fair value below amortized cost. If neither of these two conditions exist, the difference between the amortized cost of the fixed maturity security and the present value of projected future cash flows expected to be collected is recognized as an OTTI in earnings (“credit loss”). If

29

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

the estimated fair value is less than the present value of projected future cash flows expected to be collected, this portion of OTTI related to other-than credit factors (“noncredit loss”) is recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). Adjustments are not made for subsequent recoveries in value.

With respect to equity securities, the Company considers in its OTTI analysis its intent and ability to hold a particular equity security for a period of time sufficient to allow for the recovery of its estimated fair value to an amount equal to or greater than cost. If a sale decision is made for an equity security and it is not expected to recover to an amount at least equal to cost prior to the expected time of the sale, the security will be deemed other-than-temporarily impaired in the period that the sale decision was made and an OTTI loss will be recorded in earnings. When an OTTI loss has occurred, the OTTI loss is the entire difference between the equity security’s cost and its estimated fair value with a corresponding charge to earnings.

Upon acquisition, the Company classifies perpetual securities that have attributes of both debt and equity as fixed maturity securities if the securities have an interest rate step-up feature which, when combined with other qualitative factors, indicates that the securities have more debt-like characteristics; while those with more equity-like characteristics are classified as equity securities within non-redeemable preferred stock. Many of such securities, commonly referred to as “perpetual hybrid securities,” have been issued by non-U.S. financial institutions that are accorded the highest two capital treatment categories by their respective regulatory bodies (i.e. core capital, or “Tier 1 capital” and perpetual deferrable securities, or “Upper Tier 2 capital”). With respect to perpetual hybrid securities, the Company considers in its OTTI analysis whether there has been any deterioration in credit of the issuer and the likelihood of recovery in value of the securities that are in a severe and extended unrealized loss position. The Company also considers whether any perpetual hybrid securities, with an unrealized loss, regardless of credit rating, have deferred any dividend payments. When an OTTI loss has occurred, the OTTI loss is the entire difference between the perpetual hybrid security’s cost and its estimated fair value with a corresponding charge to earnings.

The Company’s methodology and significant inputs used to determine the amount of the credit loss on fixed maturity securities are as follows:

(i) The Company calculates the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the present value of future cash flows expected to be received. The discount rate is generally the effective interest rate of the fixed maturity security prior to impairment.

(ii) When determining the collectability and the period over which value is expected to recover, the Company applies the same considerations utilized in its overall impairment evaluation process which incorporates information regarding the specific security, fundamentals of the industry and geographic area in which the security issuer operates, and overall macroeconomic conditions. Projected future cash flows are estimated using assumptions derived from management’s best estimates of likely scenario-based outcomes after giving consideration to a variety of variables that include, but are not limited to: general payment terms of the security; the likelihood that the issuer can service the scheduled interest and principal payments; the quality and amount of any credit enhancements; the security’s position within the capital structure of the issuer; possible corporate restructurings or asset sales by the issuer; and changes to the rating of the security or the issuer by rating agencies.

(iii) Additional considerations are made when assessing the unique features that apply to certain structured securities such as residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) and ABS. These additional factors for structured securities include, but are not limited to: the quality of underlying collateral; expected prepayment speeds; current and forecasted loss severity; consideration of the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security; and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security.

30

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

(iv) When determining the amount of the credit loss for U.S. and foreign corporate securities, foreign government securities and state and political subdivision securities, management considers the estimated fair value as the recovery value when available information does not indicate that another value is more appropriate. When information is identified that indicates a recovery value other than estimated fair value, management considers in the determination of recovery value the same considerations utilized in its overall impairment evaluation process as described in (ii) above.

The cost or amortized cost of fixed maturity and equity securities is adjusted for OTTI in the period in which the determination is made. The Company does not change the revised cost basis for subsequent recoveries in value.

In periods subsequent to the recognition of OTTI on a fixed maturity security, the Company accounts for the impaired security as if it had been purchased on the measurement date of the impairment. Accordingly, the discount (or reduced premium) based on the new cost basis is accreted into net investment income over the remaining term of the fixed maturity security in a prospective manner based on the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows.

Other Securities.  Other securities are stated at estimated fair value. Other securities include securities for which the fair value option (“FVO”) has been elected (“FVO Securities”). FVO Securities include certain fixed maturity securities held-for-investment by the general account to support asset and liability matching strategies for certain insurance products. FVO Securities also include contractholder-directed investments supporting unit-linked variable annuity type liabilities which do not qualify for presentation and reporting as separate account summary total assets and liabilities. These investments are primarily mutual funds. The investment returns on these investments inure to contractholders and are offset by a corresponding change in policyholder account balances (“PABs”) through interest credited to policyholder account balances. Changes in estimated fair value of these other securities subsequent to purchase are included in net investment income. Interest and dividends related to other securities are included in net investment income.

Securities Lending.  Securities lending transactions, whereby blocks of securities, which are included in fixed maturity securities and short-term investments, are loaned to third parties, are treated as financing arrangements and the associated liability is recorded at the amount of cash received. At the inception of a loan, the Company obtains collateral, usually cash, in an amount generally equal to 102% of the estimated fair value of the securities loaned and maintains it at a level greater than or equal to 100% for the duration of the loan. The Company monitors the estimated fair value of the securities loaned on a daily basis with additional collateral obtained as necessary. Income and expenses associated with securities lending transactions are reported as investment income and investment expense, respectively, within net investment income.

Mortgage Loans.  For the purposes of determining valuation allowances the Company disaggregates its mortgage loan investments into two portfolio segments: commercial and agricultural.

Mortgage loans are stated at unpaid principal balance, adjusted for any unamortized premium or discount, deferred fees or expenses, and net of valuation allowances. Interest income is accrued on the principal amount of the loan based on the loan’s contractual interest rate. Amortization of premiums and discounts is recorded using the effective yield method. Interest income, amortization of premiums and discounts and prepayment fees are reported in net investment income. Interest ceases to accrue when collection of interest is not considered probable and/or when interest or principal payments are past due as follows: commercial — 60 days; and agricultural — 90 days. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, uncollected past due interest is charged-off against net investment income. Generally, the accrual of interest income resumes after all delinquent amounts are paid and management believes all future principal and

31

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

interest payments will be collected. Cash receipts on non-accruing loans are recorded in accordance with the loan agreement as a reduction of principal and/or interest income. Charge-offs occur upon the realization of a credit loss, typically through foreclosure or after a decision is made to sell a loan. Gain or loss upon charge-off is recorded, net of previously established valuation allowances, in net investment gains (losses). Cash recoveries on principal amounts previously charged-off are generally recorded as an increase to the valuation allowance, unless the valuation allowance adequately provides for expected credit losses; then the recovery is recorded in net investment gains (losses). Gains and losses from sales of loans and increases or decreases to valuation allowances are recorded in net investment gains (losses).

Mortgage loans are considered to be impaired when it is probable that based upon current information and events, the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Specific valuation allowances are established using the same methodology for both portfolio segments as the excess carrying value of a loan over either (i) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate, (ii) the estimated fair value of the loan’s underlying collateral if the loan is in the process of foreclosure or otherwise collateral dependent, or (iii) the loan’s observable market price. A common evaluation framework is used for establishing non-specific valuation allowances for all loan portfolio segments; however, a separate non-specific valuation allowance is calculated and maintained for each loan portfolio segment that is based on inputs unique to each loan portfolio segment. Non-specific valuation allowances are established for pools of loans with similar risk characteristics where a property-specific or market-specific risk has not been identified, but for which the Company expects to incur a credit loss. These evaluations are based upon several loan portfolio segment-specific factors, including the Company’s experience for loan losses, defaults and loss severity, and loss expectations for loans with similar risk characteristics. These evaluations are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available.

For commercial and agricultural mortgage loans, the Company typically uses 10 years or more of historical experience in establishing non-specific valuation allowances. For commercial mortgage loans, 20 years of historical experience is used which captures multiple economic cycles. For evaluations of commercial mortgage loans, in addition to historical experience, management considers factors that include the impact of a rapid change to the economy, which may not be reflected in the loan portfolio, and recent loss and recovery trend experience as compared to historical loss and recovery experience. For agricultural mortgage loans, ten years of historical experience is used which captures a full economic cycle. For evaluations of agricultural loans, in addition to historical experience, management considers factors that include increased stress in certain sectors, which may be evidenced by higher delinquency rates, or a change in the number of higher risk loans. For commercial and agricultural mortgage loans, on a quarterly basis, management incorporates the impact of these current market events and conditions on historical experience in determining the non-specific valuation allowance established for each portfolio segment level.

Commercial and Agricultural Mortgage Loans —All commercial loans are reviewed on an ongoing basis which may include an analysis of the property financial statements and rent roll, lease rollover analysis, property inspections, market analysis, estimated valuations of the underlying collateral, loan-to-value ratios, debt service coverage ratios, and tenant creditworthiness. All agricultural loans are monitored on an ongoing basis. The monitoring process focuses on higher risk loans, which include those that are classified as restructured, potentially delinquent, delinquent or in foreclosure, as well as loans with higher loan-to-value ratios and lower debt service coverage ratios. The monitoring process for agricultural loans is generally similar, with a focus on higher risk loans, including reviews on a geographic and property-type basis. Higher risk commercial and agricultural loans are reviewed individually on an ongoing basis for potential credit loss and specific valuation allowances are established using the methodology

32

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

described above for all loan portfolio segments. Quarterly, the remaining loans are reviewed on a pool basis by aggregating groups of loans that have similar risk characteristics for potential credit loss, and non-specific valuation allowances are established as described above using inputs that are unique to each segment of the loan portfolio.

For commercial loans, the Company’s primary credit quality indicator is the debt service coverage ratio, which compares a property’s net operating income to amounts needed to service the principal and interest due under the loan. Generally, the lower the debt service coverage ratio, the higher the risk of experiencing a credit loss. The Company also reviews the loan-to-value ratio of its commercial loan portfolio. Loan-to-value ratios compare the unpaid principal balance of the loan to the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral. A loan-to-value ratio greater than 100% indicates that the loan’s unpaid principal balance is greater than the collateral value. A loan-to-value ratio of less than 100% indicates an excess of collateral value over the loan’s unpaid principal balance. Generally, the higher the loan-to-value ratio, the higher the risk of experiencing a credit loss. The debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value ratio, as well as the values utilized in calculating these ratios, are updated annually, on a rolling basis, with a portion of the loan portfolio updated each quarter.

For agricultural loans, the Company’s primary credit quality indicator is the loan-to-value ratio. The values utilized in calculating this ratio are developed in connection with the ongoing review of the agricultural loan portfolio and are routinely updated.

Mortgage Loans Modified in a Troubled Debt Restructuring.  For a small portion of the portfolio, classified as troubled debt restructurings, concessions are granted related to the borrowers’ financial difficulties. Generally, the types of concessions include: reduction of the contractual interest rate, extension of the maturity date at an interest rate lower than current market interest rates and/or a reduction of accrued interest. The amount, timing and extent of the concession granted is considered in determining any impairment or changes in the specific valuation allowance recorded in connection with the troubled debt restructuring. Through the continuous portfolio monitoring process, a specific valuation allowance may have been recorded prior to the quarter when the mortgage loan is modified in a troubled debt restructuring. Accordingly, the carrying value (after specific valuation allowance) before and after modification through a troubled debt restructuring may not change significantly, or may increase if the expected recovery is higher than the pre-modification recovery assessment.

Policy Loans.  Policy loans are stated at unpaid principal balances. Interest income on such loans is recorded as earned in net investment income using the contractually agreed upon interest rate. Generally, interest is capitalized on the policy’s anniversary date. Valuation allowances are not established for policy loans, as these loans are fully collateralized by the cash surrender value of the underlying insurance policies. Any unpaid principal or interest on the loan is deducted from the cash surrender value or the death benefit prior to settlement of the policy.

Real Estate.  Real estate held-for-investment, including related improvements, is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset (typically 20 to 55 years). Rental income is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective leases. The Company classifies a property as held-for-sale if it commits to a plan to sell a property within one year and actively markets the property in its current condition for a price that is reasonable in comparison to its estimated fair value. The Company classifies the results of operations and the gain or loss on sale of a property that either has been disposed of or classified as held-for-sale as discontinued operations, if the ongoing operations of the property will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of the Company and if the Company will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the property after the

33

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

sale. Real estate held-for-sale is stated at the lower of depreciated cost or estimated fair value less expected disposition costs. Real estate is not depreciated while it is classified as held-for-sale. The Company periodically reviews its properties held-for-investment for impairment and tests properties for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable and the carrying value of the property exceeds its estimated fair value. Properties whose carrying values are greater than their undiscounted cash flows are written down to their estimated fair value, with the impairment loss included in net investment gains (losses). Impairment losses are based upon the estimated fair value of real estate, which is generally computed using the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the underlying risks. Real estate acquired upon foreclosure is recorded at the lower of estimated fair value or the carrying value of the mortgage loan at the date of foreclosure.

Real Estate Joint Ventures and Other Limited Partnership Interests.  The Company uses the equity method of accounting for investments in real estate joint ventures and other limited partnership interests consisting of leveraged buy-out funds, hedge funds and other private equity funds in which it has more than a minor ownership interest or more than a minor influence over the joint venture’s or partnership’s operations, but does not have a controlling interest and is not the primary beneficiary. The equity method is also used for such investments in which the Company has more than a minor influence or more than a 20% interest. Generally, the Company records its share of earnings using a three-month lag methodology for instances where the timely financial information is not available and the contractual agreements provide for the delivery of the investees’ financial information after the end of the Company’s reporting period. The Company uses the cost method of accounting for investments in real estate joint ventures and other limited partnership interests in which it has a minor equity investment and virtually no influence over the joint venture’s or the partnership’s operations. Based on the nature and structure of these investments, they do not meet the characteristics of an equity security. The Company reports the distributions from real estate joint ventures and other limited partnership interests accounted for under the cost method and equity in earnings from real estate joint ventures and other limited partnership interests accounted for under the equity method in net investment income. In addition to the investees performing regular evaluations for the impairment of underlying investments, the Company routinely evaluates its investments in real estate joint ventures and other limited partnerships for impairments. The Company considers its cost method investments for OTTI when the carrying value of real estate joint ventures and other limited partnership interests exceeds the net asset value (“NAV”). The Company takes into consideration the severity and duration of this excess when deciding if the cost method investment is other-than-temporarily impaired. For equity method investees, the Company considers financial and other information provided by the investee, other known information and inherent risks in the underlying investments, as well as future capital commitments, in determining whether an impairment has occurred. When an OTTI is deemed to have occurred, the Company records a realized capital loss within net investment gains (losses) to record the investment at its estimated fair value.

Short-term Investments.  Short-term investments include securities and other investments with remaining maturities of one year or less, but greater than three months, at the time of purchase and are stated at estimated fair value or amortized cost, which approximates estimated fair value. Short-term investments also include investments in affiliated money market pools.

Other Invested Assets.  Other invested assets consist principally of freestanding derivatives with positive estimated fair values, loans to affiliates, leveraged leases, tax credit partnerships and investments in insurance enterprise joint ventures.

34

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Freestanding derivatives with positive estimated fair values are described in “— Derivative Financial Instruments” below.

Loans to affiliates are stated at unpaid principal balance, adjusted for any unamortized premium or discount.

Leveraged leases are recorded net of non-recourse debt. The Company recognizes income on the leveraged leases by applying the leveraged lease’s estimated rate of return to the net investment in the lease. The Company regularly reviews residual values and impairs them to expected values.

Tax credit partnerships are established for the purpose of investing in low-income housing and other social causes, where the primary return on investment is in the form of income tax credits and are accounted for under the equity method or under the effective yield method.

Joint venture investments represent the Company’s investments in entities that engage in insurance underwriting activities and are accounted for under the equity method. The Company reports the equity in earnings of joint venture investments and tax credit partnerships in net investment income.

Investments Risks and Uncertainties.  The Company’s investments are exposed to four primary sources of risk: credit, interest rate, liquidity risk, and market valuation. The financial statement risks, stemming from such investment risks, are those associated with the determination of estimated fair values, the diminished ability to sell certain investments in times of strained market conditions, the recognition of impairments, the recognition of income on certain investments and the potential consolidation of VIEs. The use of different methodologies, assumptions and inputs relating to these financial statement risks may have a material effect on the amounts presented within the consolidated financial statements.

When available, the estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed maturity and equity securities are based on quoted prices in active markets that are readily and regularly obtainable. Generally, these are the most liquid of the Company’s securities holdings and valuation of these securities does not involve management judgment.

When quoted prices in active markets are not available, the determination of estimated fair value is based on market standard valuation methodologies as described in “— Fair Value” below and in Note 4. Such estimated fair values are based on available market information and management’s judgments about financial instruments. The observable and unobservable inputs used in the standard market valuation methodologies are described in Note 4.

Financial markets are susceptible to severe events evidenced by rapid depreciation in asset values accompanied by a reduction in asset liquidity. The Company’s ability to sell securities, or the price ultimately realized for these securities, depends upon the demand and liquidity in the market and increases the use of judgment in determining the estimated fair value of certain securities.

The determination of the amount of valuation allowances and impairments, as applicable, is described previously by investment type. The determination of such valuation allowances and impairments is highly subjective and is based upon the Company’s periodic evaluation and assessment of known and inherent risks associated with the respective asset class. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available.

The recognition of income on certain investments (e.g. structured securities, including mortgage-backed and ABS, certain structured investment transactions, and other securities) is dependent upon prepayments and defaults, which could result in changes in amounts to be earned.

35

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The Company has invested in certain structured transactions that are VIEs. These structured transactions include asset-backed securitizations, hybrid securities, real estate joint ventures, other limited partnership interests, and limited liability companies. The Company consolidates those VIEs for which it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary.

The accounting guidance for the determination of when an entity is a VIE and when to consolidate a VIE is complex and requires significant management judgment. The determination of the VIE’s primary beneficiary requires an evaluation of the contractual and implied rights and obligations associated with each party’s relationship with or involvement in the entity, an estimate of the entity’s expected losses and expected residual returns and the allocation of such estimates to each party involved in the entity. The Company generally uses a qualitative approach to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary.

For most VIEs, the entity that has both the ability to direct the most significant activities of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits that could be significant to the VIE is considered the primary beneficiary. However, for VIEs that are investment companies or apply measurement principles consistent with those utilized by investment companies, the primary beneficiary is based on a risks and rewards model and is defined as the entity that will absorb a majority of a VIE’s expected losses, receive a majority of a VIE’s expected residual returns if no single entity absorbs a majority of expected losses, or both. The Company reassesses its involvement with VIEs on a quarterly basis. The use of different methodologies, assumptions and inputs in the determination of the primary beneficiary could have a material effect on the amounts presented within the consolidated financial statements.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivatives are financial instruments whose values are derived from interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, credit spreads and/or other financial indices. Derivatives may be exchange-traded or contracted in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market. The Company uses a variety of derivatives, including swaps, forwards, futures and option contracts, to manage various risks relating to its ongoing business operations. To a lesser extent, the Company uses credit derivatives, such as credit default swaps, to synthetically replicate investment risks and returns which are not readily available in the cash market. The Company also purchases certain securities, issues certain insurance policies and investment contracts and engages in certain reinsurance agreements that have embedded derivatives.

Freestanding derivatives are carried in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets either as assets within other invested assets or as liabilities within other liabilities at estimated fair value as determined through the use of quoted market prices for exchange-traded derivatives or through the use of pricing models for OTC derivatives. The determination of estimated fair value of freestanding derivatives, when quoted market values are not available, is based on market standard valuation methodologies and inputs that management believes are consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing the instruments. Derivative valuations can be affected by changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, financial indices, credit spreads, default risk, nonperformance risk, volatility, liquidity and changes in estimates and assumptions used in the pricing models.

Accruals on derivatives are generally recorded in accrued investment income or within other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. However, accruals that are not expected to settle within one year are included with the derivative carrying value in other invested assets or other liabilities.

The Company does not offset the fair value amounts recognized for derivatives executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting agreement.

36

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

If a derivative is not designated as an accounting hedge or its use in managing risk does not qualify for hedge accounting, changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative are generally reported in net derivative gains (losses) except for those (i) in policyholder benefits and claims for economic hedges of variable annuity guarantees included in future policy benefits; and (ii) in net investment income for economic hedges of equity method investments in joint ventures. The fluctuations in estimated fair value of derivatives which have not been designated for hedge accounting can result in significant volatility in net income.

To qualify for hedge accounting, at the inception of the hedging relationship, the Company formally documents its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedging transaction, as well as its designation of the hedge as either (i) a hedge of the estimated fair value of a recognized asset or liability (“fair value hedge”); or (ii) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow hedge”). In this documentation, the Company sets forth how the hedging instrument is expected to hedge the designated risks related to the hedged item and sets forth the method that will be used to retrospectively and prospectively assess the hedging instrument’s effectiveness and the method which will be used to measure ineffectiveness. A derivative designated as a hedging instrument must be assessed as being highly effective in offsetting the designated risk of the hedged item. Hedge effectiveness is formally assessed at inception and periodically throughout the life of the designated hedging relationship. Assessments of hedge effectiveness and measurements of ineffectiveness are also subject to interpretation and estimation and different interpretations or estimates may have a material effect on the amount reported in net income.

The accounting for derivatives is complex and interpretations of the primary accounting guidance continue to evolve in practice. Judgment is applied in determining the availability and application of hedge accounting designations and the appropriate accounting treatment under such accounting guidance. If it was determined that hedge accounting designations were not appropriately applied, reported net income could be materially affected.

Under a fair value hedge, changes in the estimated fair value of the hedging derivative, including amounts measured as ineffectiveness, and changes in the estimated fair value of the hedged item related to the designated risk being hedged, are reported within net derivative gains (losses). The estimated fair values of the hedging derivatives are exclusive of any accruals that are separately reported in the consolidated statement of operations within interest income or interest expense to match the location of the hedged item.

Under a cash flow hedge, changes in the estimated fair value of the hedging derivative measured as effective are reported within other comprehensive income (loss), a separate component of stockholders’ equity and the deferred gains or losses on the derivative are reclassified into the consolidated statement of operations when the Company’s earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the hedged item. Changes in the estimated fair value of the hedging instrument measured as ineffectiveness are reported within net derivative gains (losses). The estimated fair values of the hedging derivatives are exclusive of any accruals that are separately reported in the consolidated statement of operations within interest income or interest expense to match the location of the hedged item.

The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (i) it is determined that the derivative is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in the estimated fair value or cash flows of a hedged item; (ii) the derivative expires, is sold, terminated, or exercised; (iii) it is no longer probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will occur; or (iv) the derivative is de-designated as a hedging instrument.

When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined that the derivative is not highly effective in offsetting changes in the estimated fair value or cash flows of a hedged item, the derivative continues to be carried in the consolidated balance sheets at its estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value

37

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

recognized currently in net derivative gains (losses). The carrying value of the hedged recognized asset or liability under a fair value hedge is no longer adjusted for changes in its estimated fair value due to the hedged risk, and the cumulative adjustment to its carrying value is amortized into income over the remaining life of the hedged item. Provided the hedged forecasted transaction is still probable of occurrence, the changes in estimated fair value of derivatives recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) related to discontinued cash flow hedges are released into the consolidated statements of operations when the Company’s earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the hedged item.

When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is no longer probable that the forecasted transactions will occur on the anticipated date or within two months of that date, the derivative continues to be carried in the consolidated balance sheets at its estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized currently in net derivative gains (losses). Deferred gains and losses of a derivative recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) pursuant to the discontinued cash flow hedge of a forecasted transaction that is no longer probable are recognized immediately in net derivative gains (losses).

In all other situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued, the derivative is carried at its estimated fair value in the consolidated balance sheets, with changes in its estimated fair value recognized in the current period as net derivative gains (losses).

The Company issues certain products and purchases certain investments that contain embedded derivatives. The Company assesses each identified embedded derivative to determine whether it is required to be bifurcated. If the instrument would not be accounted for in its entirety at estimated fair value and it is determined that the terms of the embedded derivative are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract, and that a separate instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument, the embedded derivative is bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for as a freestanding derivative. Such embedded derivatives are carried in the consolidated balance sheets at estimated fair value with the host contract and changes in their estimated fair value are generally reported in net derivative gains (losses). If the Company is unable to properly identify and measure an embedded derivative for separation from its host contract, the entire contract is carried on the balance sheet at estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in the current period in net investment gains (losses) or net investment income. Additionally, the Company may elect to carry an entire contract on the balance sheet at estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in the current period in net investment gains (losses) or net investment income if that contract contains an embedded derivative that requires bifurcation.

Fair Value

As described below, certain assets and liabilities are measured at estimated fair value in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. In addition, the notes to these consolidated financial statements include further disclosures of estimated fair values. The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. In most cases, the exit price and the transaction (or entry) price will be the same at initial recognition.

Subsequent to initial recognition, fair values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are readily and regularly obtainable. When such quoted prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar but not identical assets or liabilities, or other observable inputs. If these inputs are not available, or observable inputs are not determinative, unobservable inputs and/or adjustments to observable inputs requiring management judgment are used to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities.

38

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The Company considers three broad valuation techniques: (i) the market approach, (ii) the income approach, and (iii) the cost approach. The Company determines the most appropriate valuation technique to use, given what is being measured and the availability of sufficient inputs, giving priority to observable inputs. The Company categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value into a three-level hierarchy, based on the significant input with the lowest level in its valuation. The input levels are as follows:

Level 1	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The Company defines active markets based on average trading volume for equity securities. The size of the bid/ask spread is used as an indicator of market activity for fixed maturity securities.
Level 2	Quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly. These inputs can include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities other than quoted prices in Level 1, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other significant inputs that are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3	Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the estimated fair value of the assets or liabilities. Unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid securities and other investments purchased with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at amortized cost, which approximates estimated fair value.

Property, Equipment, Leasehold Improvements and Computer Software

Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, which are included in other assets, are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as appropriate. Estimated lives generally range from five to 10 years for leasehold improvements and three to seven years for all other property and equipment. The net book value of the property, equipment and leasehold improvements was insignificant at both December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Computer software, which is included in other assets, is stated at cost, less accumulated amortization. Purchased software costs, as well as certain internal and external costs incurred to develop internal-use computer software during the application development stage, are capitalized. Such costs are amortized generally over a four-year period using the straight-line method. The cost basis of computer software was $153 million and $131 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Accumulated amortization of capitalized software was $83 million and $67 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Related amortization expense was $17 million, $25 million and $16 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Value of Business Acquired

The Company incurs significant costs in connection with acquiring new and renewal insurance business. Costs that are related directly to the successful acquisition or renewal of insurance contracts are deferred as deferred policy acquisition costs (“DAC”). Such costs include: (1) incremental direct costs of contract acquisition, such as commissions, (2) the portion of an employee’s total compensation and benefits related to time spent selling, underwriting or processing the issuance of new and renewal insurance business only with respect to actual policies acquired or renewed, (3) other direct costs essential to contract acquisition that would not have been

39

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

incurred had a policy not been acquired or renewed, and (4) in limited circumstances, the costs of direct-response advertising whose primary purpose is to elicit sales to customers who could be shown to have responded specifically to the advertising and that results in probable future benefits. All other acquisition-related costs, including those related to general advertising and solicitation, market research, agent training, product development, unsuccessful sales and underwriting efforts, as well as all indirect costs, are expensed as incurred.

Value of business acquired (“VOBA”) is an intangible asset resulting from a business combination that represents the excess of book value over the estimated fair value of acquired insurance, annuity, and investment-type contracts in-force at the acquisition date. The estimated fair value of the acquired liabilities is based on actuarially determined projections, by each block of business, of future policy and contract charges, premiums, mortality and morbidity, separate account performance, surrenders, operating expenses, investment returns, nonperformance risk adjustment and other factors. Actual experience on the purchased business may vary from these projections.

The recovery of DAC and VOBA is dependent upon the future profitability of the related business. DAC and VOBA are aggregated in the consolidated financial statements for reporting purposes.

The Company amortizes DAC and VOBA on life insurance or investment-type contracts in proportion to gross premiums, gross margins or gross profits, depending on the type of contract as described below.

The Company amortizes DAC and VOBA related to non-participating and non-dividend-paying traditional contracts (primarily term insurance) over the appropriate premium paying period in proportion to the present value of actual historic and expected future gross premiums. The present value of expected premiums is based upon the premium requirement of each policy and assumptions for mortality, morbidity, persistency and investment returns at policy issuance, or policy acquisition (as it relates to VOBA), that include provisions for adverse deviation that are consistent with the assumptions used to calculate future policyholder benefit liabilities. These assumptions are not revised after policy issuance or acquisition unless the DAC or VOBA balance is deemed to be unrecoverable from future expected profits. Absent a premium deficiency, variability in amortization after policy issuance or acquisition is caused only by variability in premium volumes.

The Company amortizes DAC related to participating, dividend-paying traditional contracts over the estimated lives of the contracts in proportion to actual and expected future gross margins. The amortization includes interest based on rates in effect at inception of the contracts. The future gross margins are dependent principally on investment returns, policyholder dividend scales, mortality, persistency, expenses to administer the business, creditworthiness of reinsurance counterparties and certain economic variables, such as inflation. Of these factors, the Company anticipates that investment returns, expenses, persistency and other factor changes, as well as policyholder dividend scales are reasonably likely to impact significantly the rate of DAC amortization. Each reporting period, the Company updates the estimated gross margins with the actual gross margins for that period. When the actual gross margins change from previously estimated gross margins, the cumulative DAC amortization is re-estimated and adjusted by a cumulative charge or credit to current operations. When actual gross margins exceed those previously estimated, the DAC amortization will increase, resulting in a current period charge to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the actual gross margins are below the previously estimated gross margins. Each reporting period, the Company also updates the actual amount of business in-force, which impacts expected future gross margins. When expected future gross margins are below those previously estimated, the DAC amortization will increase, resulting in a current period charge to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the expected future gross margins are above the previously estimated expected future gross margins. Each period, the Company also reviews the estimated gross margins for each block of business to determine the recoverability of DAC balances.

The Company amortizes DAC and VOBA related to fixed and variable universal life contracts and fixed and variable deferred annuity contracts over the estimated lives of the contracts in proportion to actual and expected future gross profits. The amortization includes interest based on rates in effect at inception or acquisition of the

40

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

contracts. The amount of future gross profits is dependent principally upon returns in excess of the amounts credited to policyholders, mortality, persistency, interest crediting rates, expenses to administer the business, creditworthiness of reinsurance counterparties, the effect of any hedges used and certain economic variables, such as inflation. Of these factors, the Company anticipates that investment returns, expenses and persistency are reasonably likely to impact significantly the rate of DAC and VOBA amortization. Each reporting period, the Company updates the estimated gross profits with the actual gross profits for that period. When the actual gross profits change from previously estimated gross profits, the cumulative DAC and VOBA amortization is re-estimated and adjusted by a cumulative charge or credit to current operations. When actual gross profits exceed those previously estimated, the DAC and VOBA amortization will increase, resulting in a current period charge to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the actual gross profits are below the previously estimated gross profits. Each reporting period, the Company also updates the actual amount of business remaining in-force, which impacts expected future gross profits. When expected future gross profits are below those previously estimated, the DAC and VOBA amortization will increase, resulting in a current period charge to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the expected future gross profits are above the previously estimated expected future gross profits. Each period, the Company also reviews the estimated gross profits for each block of business to determine the recoverability of DAC and VOBA balances.

Separate account rates of return on variable universal life contracts and variable deferred annuity contracts affect in-force account balances on such contracts each reporting period which can result in significant fluctuations in amortization of DAC and VOBA. Returns that are higher than the Company’s long-term expectation produce higher account balances, which increases the Company’s future fee expectations and decreases future benefit payment expectations on minimum death and living benefit guarantees, resulting in higher expected future gross profits. The opposite result occurs when returns are lower than the Company’s long-term expectation. The Company’s practice to determine the impact of gross profits resulting from returns on separate accounts assumes that long-term appreciation in equity markets is not changed by short-term market fluctuations, but is only changed when sustained interim deviations are expected. The Company monitors these events and only changes the assumption when its long-term expectation changes.

The Company also periodically reviews other long-term assumptions underlying the projections of estimated gross margins and profits. These include investment returns, policyholder dividend scales, interest crediting rates, mortality, persistency and expenses to administer business. Management annually updates assumptions used in the calculation of estimated gross margins and profits which may have significantly changed. If the update of assumptions causes expected future gross margins and profits to increase, DAC and VOBA amortization will decrease, resulting in a current period increase to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the assumption update causes expected future gross margins and profits to decrease.

Periodically, the Company modifies product benefits, features, rights or coverages that occur by the exchange of a contract for a new contract, or by amendment, endorsement, or rider to a contract, or by election or coverage within a contract. If such modification, referred to as an internal replacement, substantially changes the contract, the associated DAC or VOBA is written off immediately through income and any new deferrable costs associated with the replacement contract are deferred. If the modification does not substantially change the contract, the DAC or VOBA amortization on the original contract will continue and any acquisition costs associated with the related modification are expensed.

Sales Inducements

The Company generally has two different types of sales inducements which are included in other assets: (i) the policyholder receives a bonus whereby the policyholder’s initial account balance is increased by an amount equal to a specified percentage of the customer’s deposit; and (ii) the policyholder receives a higher interest rate using

41

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

a dollar cost averaging method than would have been received based on the normal general account interest rate credited. The Company defers sales inducements and amortizes them over the life of the policy using the same methodology and assumptions used to amortize DAC. The amortization of sales inducements is included in policyholder benefits and claims. Each year, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a potentially significant recoverability issue exists, the Company reviews the deferred sales inducements to determine the recoverability of these balances.

Value of Distribution Agreements and Customer Relationships Acquired

Value of distribution agreements acquired (“VODA”) is reported in other assets and represents the present value of expected future profits associated with the expected future business derived from the distribution agreements acquired as part of a business combination. Value of customer relationships acquired (“VOCRA”) is also reported in other assets and represents the present value of the expected future profits associated with the expected future business acquired through existing customers of the acquired company or business. The VODA and VOCRA associated with past acquisitions are amortized over useful lives ranging from 10 to 30 years and such amortization is included in other expenses. Each year, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a potentially significant recoverability issue exists, the Company reviews VODA and VOCRA to determine the recoverability of these balances.

Goodwill

Goodwill is the excess of cost over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired which represents the future economic benefits arising from such net assets acquired that could not be individually identified. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances, such as adverse changes in the business climate, indicate that there may be justification for conducting an interim test. The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment testing during the third quarter of each year based upon data as of the close of the second quarter. Goodwill associated with a business acquisition is not tested for impairment during the year the business is acquired unless there is a significant identified impairment event.

Impairment testing is performed using the fair value approach, which requires the use of estimates and judgment, at the “reporting unit” level. A reporting unit is the operating segment or a business one level below the operating segment, if discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by management at that level. For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, goodwill within Corporate & Other is allocated to reporting units within the Company’s segments.

For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, there might be an indication of impairment. In such instances, the implied fair value of the goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill that would be determined in a business acquisition. The excess of the carrying value of goodwill over the implied fair value of goodwill would be recognized as an impairment and recorded as a charge against net income.

In performing the Company’s goodwill impairment tests, the estimated fair values of the reporting units are first determined using a market multiple approach. When further corroboration is required, the Company uses a discounted cash flow approach. For reporting units which are particularly sensitive to market assumptions, such as the annuities and life reporting units, the Company may use additional valuation methodologies to estimate the reporting units’ fair values.

The key inputs, judgments and assumptions necessary in determining estimated fair value of the reporting units include projected operating earnings, current book value (with or without accumulated other comprehensive income), the level of economic capital required to support the mix of business, long-term growth rates, comparative market multiples, the account value of in-force business, projections of new and renewal business,

42

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

as well as margins on such business, the level of interest rates, credit spreads, equity market levels and the discount rate that the Company believes is appropriate for the respective reporting unit. The estimated fair values of the annuities and life reporting units are particularly sensitive to the equity market levels.

The Company applies significant judgment when determining the estimated fair value of the Company’s reporting units. The valuation methodologies utilized are subject to key judgments and assumptions that are sensitive to change. Estimates of fair value are inherently uncertain and represent only management’s reasonable expectation regarding future developments. These estimates and the judgments and assumptions upon which the estimates are based will, in all likelihood, differ in some respects from actual future results. Declines in the estimated fair value of the Company’s reporting units could result in goodwill impairments in future periods which could materially adversely affect the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates potential triggering events that may affect the estimated fair value of the Company’s reporting units to assess whether any goodwill impairment exists. Deteriorating or adverse market conditions for certain reporting units may have a significant impact on the estimated fair value of these reporting units and could result in future impairments of goodwill.

See Note 6 for discussion of goodwill impairment testing during 2011.

Liability for Future Policy Benefits and PABs

The Company establishes liabilities for amounts payable under insurance policies, including traditional life insurance, traditional annuities and non-medical health insurance. Generally, amounts are payable over an extended period of time and related liabilities are calculated as the present value of future expected benefits to be paid reduced by the present value of future expected premiums. Such liabilities are established based on methods and underlying assumptions in accordance with GAAP and applicable actuarial standards. Principal assumptions used in the establishment of liabilities for future policy benefits are mortality, morbidity, policy lapse, renewal, retirement, investment returns, inflation, expenses and other contingent events as appropriate to the respective product type. These assumptions are established at the time the policy is issued and are intended to estimate the experience for the period the policy benefits are payable. Utilizing these assumptions, liabilities are established on a block of business basis. For long duration insurance contracts, assumptions such as mortality, morbidity and interest rates are “locked in” upon the issuance of new business. However, significant adverse changes in experience on such contracts may require us to establish premium deficiency reserves. Such reserves are determined based on assumptions at the time the premium deficiency reserve is established and do not include a provision for adverse deviation.

The Company began selling participating traditional life insurance policies in 2011. Such policies are 90% reinsured. Future policy benefit liabilities for participating traditional life insurance policies are equal to the aggregate of net level premium reserves for death and endowment policy benefits (calculated based upon the non-forfeiture interest rate of 4%, and mortality rates guaranteed in calculating the cash surrender values described in such contracts).

Participating business represented approximately 1% of the Company’s life insurance in-force at December 31, 2011. Participating policies represented approximately 10% of gross life insurance premiums for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Future policy benefit liabilities for non-participating traditional life insurance policies are equal to the aggregate of the present value of expected future benefit payments and related expenses less the present value of expected future net premiums. Assumptions as to mortality and persistency are based upon the Company’s experience when the basis of the liability is established. Interest rate assumptions for the aggregate future policy benefit liabilities range from 2% to 7%.

43

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Future policy benefit liabilities for individual and group traditional fixed annuities after annuitization are equal to the present value of expected future payments. Interest rate assumptions used in establishing such liabilities range from 4% to 8%.

Future policy benefit liabilities for non-medical health insurance are calculated using the net level premium method and assumptions as to future morbidity, withdrawals and interest, which provide a margin for adverse deviation. Interest rate assumptions used in establishing such liabilities range from 4% to 7%.

Future policy benefit liabilities for disabled lives are estimated using the present value of benefits method and experience assumptions as to claim terminations, expenses and interest. Interest rate assumptions used in establishing such liabilities range from 3% to 7%.

Liabilities for unpaid claims and claim expenses for the Company’s workers’ compensation business are included in future policyholder benefits and are estimated based upon the Company’s historical experience and other actuarial assumptions that consider the effects of current developments, anticipated trends and risk management programs, reduced for anticipated subrogation. The effects of changes in such estimated liabilities are included in the results of operations in the period in which the changes occur.

Liabilities for universal and variable life secondary guarantees are determined by estimating the expected value of death benefits payable when the account balance is projected to be zero and recognizing those benefits ratably over the accumulation period based on total expected assessments. The assumptions used in estimating the secondary guarantee liabilities are consistent with those used for amortizing DAC, and are thus subject to the same variability and risk. The assumptions of investment performance and volatility for variable products are consistent with historical Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) experience of the appropriate underlying equity index, such as the S&P 500 Index. The benefits used in calculating the liabilities are based on the average benefits payable over a range of scenarios.

Future policy benefit liabilities are established for certain variable annuity products with guaranteed minimum benefits as described below under “— Variable Annuity Guaranteed Minimum Benefits.”

The Company regularly reviews its estimates of actuarial liabilities for future policy benefits and compares them with its actual experience. Differences between actual experience and the assumptions used in pricing these policies and guarantees, and in the establishment of the related liabilities, result in changes in the additional liability balances with related charges or credits to benefit expenses in the period in which the changes occur.

PABs relate to investment-type contracts, universal life-type policies and certain guaranteed minimum benefits. Investment-type contracts principally include traditional individual fixed annuities in the accumulation phase and non-variable group annuity contracts. PABs for these contracts are equal to: (i) policy account values, which consist of an accumulation of gross premium payments; (ii) credited interest, ranging from 1% to 10%, less expenses, mortality charges and withdrawals; and (iii) fair value adjustments relating to business combinations.

Variable Annuity Guaranteed Minimum Benefits

The Company issues, directly and through assumed reinsurance, certain variable annuity products with guaranteed minimum benefits that provide the policyholder a minimum return based on their initial deposit (i.e., the benefit base) less withdrawals. In some cases the benefit base may be increased by additional deposits, bonus amounts, accruals or optional market value resets. These guarantees are accounted for as insurance liabilities or as embedded derivatives depending on how and when the benefit is paid. Specifically, a guarantee is accounted for as an embedded derivative if a guarantee is paid without requiring (i) the occurrence of specific insurable

44

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

event, or (ii) the policyholder to annuitize. Alternatively, a guarantee is accounted for as an insurance liability if the guarantee is paid only upon either (i) the occurrence of a specific insurable event, or (ii) annuitization. In certain cases, a guarantee may have elements of both an insurance liability and an embedded derivative and in such cases the guarantee is accounted for under a split of the two models.

These guarantees include:

• Guaranteed minimum death benefit (“GMDB”) that guarantees the contractholder a return of their purchase payment upon death even if the account value is reduced to zero. An enhanced death benefit may be available for an additional fee.

• Guaranteed minimum income benefit (“GMIB”) that provides the contractholder, after a specified period of time determined at the time of issuance of the variable annuity contract, with a minimum accumulation of their purchase payments, even if the account value is reduced to zero, that can be annuitized to receive a monthly income stream that is not less than a specified amount. Certain of these contracts also provide for a guaranteed lump sum return of purchase premium in lieu of the annuitization benefit.

• Guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit (“GMWB”) that guarantees the contractholder a return of their purchase payment via partial withdrawals, even if the account value is reduced to zero, provided that the contractholder’s cumulative withdrawals in a contract year do not exceed a certain limit. Certain of these contracts include guaranteed withdrawals that are life contingent.

• Guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit (“GMAB”) that provides the contractholder, after a specified period of time determined at the time of issuance of the variable annuity contract, with a minimum accumulation of their purchase payments even if the account value is reduced to zero.

Guarantees accounted for as insurance liabilities in future policy benefits include GMDB, the portion of GMIB that require annuitization, and the life-contingent portion of certain GMWB. These liabilities are established as follows:

GMDB liabilities are determined by estimating the expected value of death benefits in excess of the projected account balance and recognizing the excess ratably over the accumulation period based on total expected assessments. The assumptions used in estimating the GMDB liabilities are consistent with those used for amortizing DAC, and are thus subject to the same variability and risk. The assumptions of investment performance and volatility are consistent with the historical experience of the appropriate underlying equity index, such as the S&P 500 Index. The benefit assumptions used in calculating the liabilities are based on the average benefits payable over a range of scenarios.

GMIB liabilities are determined by estimating the expected value of the income benefits in excess of the projected account balance at any future date of annuitization and recognizing the excess ratably over the accumulation period based on total expected assessments. The assumptions used for estimating the GMIB liabilities are consistent with those used for estimating the GMDB liabilities. In addition, the calculation of guaranteed annuitization benefit liabilities incorporates an assumption for the percentage of the potential annuitizations that may be elected by the contractholder. Certain GMIB have settlement features that result in a portion of that guarantee being accounted for as an embedded derivative and are recorded in PABs as described below.

The liability for the life contingent portion of GMWB is determined based on the expected value of the life contingent payments and expected assessments using assumptions consistent with those used for estimating the GMDB liabilities.

45

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Guarantees accounted for as embedded derivatives in PABs include the non life-contingent portion of GMWB, GMAB and the portion of certain GMIB that do not require annuitization. These guarantees are recorded at estimated fair value separately from the host variable annuity with changes in estimated fair value reported in net derivative gains (losses). At inception, the Company attributes to the embedded derivative a portion of the projected future guarantee fees to be collected from the policyholder equal to the present value of projected future guaranteed benefits. Any additional fees represent “excess” fees and are reported in universal life and investment-type product policy fees.

The estimated fair values of these embedded derivatives are then determined based on the present value of projected future benefits minus the present value of projected future fees. The projections of future benefits and future fees require capital market and actuarial assumptions including expectations concerning policyholder behavior. A risk neutral valuation methodology is used under which the cash flows from the guarantees are projected under multiple capital market scenarios using observable risk free rates. The valuation of these embedded derivatives also includes an adjustment for the Company’s nonperformance risk and risk margins related to non-capital market inputs. The nonperformance adjustment, which is captured as a spread over the risk free rate in determining the discount rate to discount the cash flows of the liability, is determined by taking into consideration publicly available information relating to spreads in the secondary market for MetLife’s debt, including related credit default swaps. These observable spreads are then adjusted, as necessary, to reflect the priority of these liabilities and the claims paying ability of the issuing insurance subsidiaries compared to MetLife. Risk margins are established to capture the non-capital market risks of the instrument which represent the additional compensation a market participant would require to assume the risks related to the uncertainties in certain actuarial assumptions. The establishment of risk margins requires the use of significant management judgment, including assumptions of the amount and cost of capital needed to cover the guarantees.

These guarantees may be more costly than expected in volatile or declining equity markets. Market conditions including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates, equity indices, market volatility and foreign currency exchange rates, changes in nonperformance risk, variations in actuarial assumptions regarding policyholder behavior, mortality and risk margins related to non-capital market inputs may result in significant fluctuations in the estimated fair value of the guarantees that could materially affect net income.

The Company ceded the risk associated with certain of the GMIB, GMAB and GMWB described in the preceding paragraphs. With respect to GMIB, a portion of the directly written GMIB guarantees are accounted for as insurance (i.e., not as embedded derivatives) but where the reinsurance agreements contain embedded derivatives. These embedded derivatives are included in premiums, reinsurance, and other receivables in the consolidated balance sheet with changes in estimated fair value reported in net derivative gains (losses). The value of the embedded derivatives on the ceded risk is determined using a methodology consistent with that described previously for the guarantees directly written by the Company with the exception of the input for nonperformance risk that reflects the credit of the reinsurer.

Other Policy-Related Balances

Other policy-related balances include policy and contract claims, unearned revenue liabilities and policyholder dividends due and unpaid.

The liability for policy and contract claims generally relates to incurred but not reported death, disability, and long-term care (“LTC”) claims, as well as claims which have been reported but not yet settled. The liability for these claims is based on the Company’s estimated ultimate cost of settling all claims. The Company derives estimates for the development of incurred but not reported claims principally from actuarial analyses of historical patterns of claims and claims development for each line of business. The methods used to determine these

46

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

estimates are continually reviewed. Adjustments resulting from this continuous review process and differences between estimates and payments for claims are recognized in policyholder benefits and claims expense in the period in which the estimates are changed or payments are made.

The unearned revenue liability relates to universal life-type and investment-type products and represents policy charges for services to be provided in future periods. The charges are deferred as unearned revenue and amortized using the product’s estimated gross profits, similar to DAC. Such amortization is recorded in universal life and investment-type product policy fees.

Also included in other policy-related balances are policyholder dividends due and unpaid on participating policies. Such liability is presented at amounts contractually due to policyholders.

Recognition of Insurance Revenue and Related Benefits

Premiums related to traditional life and annuity policies with life contingencies are recognized as revenues when due from policyholders. Policyholder benefits and expenses are provided against such revenues to recognize profits over the estimated lives of the policies. When premiums are due over a significantly shorter period than the period over which benefits are provided, any excess profit is deferred and recognized into operations in a constant relationship to insurance in-force or, for annuities, the amount of expected future policy benefit payments.

Premiums related to non-medical health and disability contracts are recognized on a pro rata basis over the applicable contract term.

Deposits related to universal life-type and investment-type products are credited to PABs. Revenues from such contracts consist of amounts assessed against PABs for mortality, policy administration and surrender charges and are recorded in universal life and investment-type product policy fees in the period in which services are provided. Amounts that are charged to operations include interest credited and benefit claims incurred in excess of related PABs.

Premiums, policy fees, policyholder benefits and expenses are presented net of reinsurance.

The portion of fees allocated to embedded derivatives described previously is recognized within net derivative gains (losses) as part of the estimated fair value of embedded derivatives.

Other Revenues

Other revenues include, in addition to items described elsewhere herein, advisory fees, broker-dealer commissions and fees and administrative service fees. Such fees and commissions are recognized in the period in which services are performed.

Income Taxes

The Company was excluded from MetLife’s life/non-life consolidated federal tax return for the five years subsequent to MetLife’s July 2005 acquisition of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut. In 2011, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and its subsidiaries joined the consolidated return and became a party to the MetLife tax sharing agreement. Prior to 2011, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut filed a consolidated tax return with its includable subsidiaries. Non-includable subsidiaries filed either separate individual corporate tax returns or separate consolidated tax returns.

The Company’s accounting for income taxes represents management’s best estimate of various events and transactions.

47

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities are measured at the balance sheet date using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years the temporary differences are expected to reverse.

The realization of deferred tax assets depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carryback or carryforward periods under the tax law in the applicable tax jurisdiction. Valuation allowances are established when management determines, based on available information, that it is more likely than not that deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Factors in management’s determination include the performance of the business and its ability to generate capital gains. Significant judgment is required in determining whether valuation allowances should be established, as well as the amount of such allowances. When making such determination, consideration is given to, among other things, the following:

(i) future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards;

(ii) future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences;

(iii) taxable income in prior carryback years; and

(iv) tax planning strategies.

The Company may be required to change its provision for income taxes in certain circumstances. Examples of such circumstances include when estimates used in determining valuation allowances on deferred tax assets significantly change or when receipt of new information indicates the need for adjustment in valuation allowances. Additionally, future events, such as changes in tax laws, tax regulations, or interpretations of such laws or regulations, could have an impact on the provision for income tax and the effective tax rate. Any such changes could significantly affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements in the year these changes occur.

The Company determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities before any part of the benefit can be recorded in the financial statements. A tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. Unrecognized tax benefits due to tax uncertainties that do not meet the threshold are included within other liabilities and are charged to earnings in the period that such determination is made.

The Company classifies interest recognized as interest expense and penalties recognized as a component of income tax.

Reinsurance

The Company enters into reinsurance agreements primarily as a purchaser of reinsurance for its life insurance products and also as a provider of reinsurance for some insurance products issued by third parties and related parties.

For each of its reinsurance agreements, the Company determines whether the agreement provides indemnification against loss or liability relating to insurance risk in accordance with applicable accounting standards. The Company reviews all contractual features, particularly those that may limit the amount of insurance risk to which the reinsurer is subject or features that delay the timely reimbursement of claims.

For reinsurance of existing in-force blocks of long-duration contracts that transfer significant insurance risk, the difference, if any, between the amounts paid (received), and the liabilities ceded (assumed) related to the underlying contracts is considered the net cost of reinsurance at the inception of the reinsurance agreement. The

48

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

net cost of reinsurance is recorded as an adjustment to DAC and recognized as a component of other expenses on a basis consistent with the way the acquisition costs on the underlying reinsured contracts would be recognized. Subsequent amounts paid (received) on the reinsurance of in-force blocks, as well as amounts paid (received) related to new business, are recorded as ceded (assumed) premiums and ceded (assumed) future policy benefit liabilities are established.

The assumptions used to account for long-duration reinsurance agreements are consistent with those used for the underlying contracts. Ceded policyholder and contract related liabilities, other than those currently due, are reported gross on the balance sheet.

Amounts currently recoverable under reinsurance agreements are included in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables and amounts currently payable are included in other liabilities. Such assets and liabilities relating to reinsurance agreements with the same reinsurer may be recorded net on the balance sheet, if a right of offset exists within the reinsurance agreement. In the event that reinsurers do not meet their obligations to the Company under the terms of the reinsurance agreements, reinsurance balances recoverable could become uncollectible. In such instances, reinsurance recoverable balances are stated net of allowances for uncollectible reinsurance.

The funds withheld liability represents amounts withheld by the Company in accordance with the terms of the reinsurance agreements. The Company withholds the funds rather than transferring the underlying investments and, as a result, records funds withheld liability within other liabilities. The Company recognizes interest on funds withheld, included in other expenses, at rates defined by the terms of the agreement which may be contractually specified or directly related to the investment portfolio.

Premiums, fees and policyholder benefits and claims include amounts assumed under reinsurance agreements and are net of reinsurance ceded. Amounts received from reinsurers for policy administration are reported in other revenues.

If the Company determines that a reinsurance agreement does not expose the reinsurer to a reasonable possibility of a significant loss from insurance risk, the Company records the agreement using the deposit method of accounting. Deposits received are included in other liabilities and deposits made are included within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables. As amounts are paid or received, consistent with the underlying contracts, the deposit assets or liabilities are adjusted. Interest on such deposits is recorded as other revenues or other expenses, as appropriate. Periodically, the Company evaluates the adequacy of the expected payments or recoveries and adjusts the deposit asset or liability through other revenues or other expenses, as appropriate.

Accounting for reinsurance requires extensive use of assumptions and estimates, particularly related to the future performance of the underlying business and the potential impact of counterparty credit risks. The Company periodically reviews actual and anticipated experience compared to the aforementioned assumptions used to establish assets and liabilities relating to ceded and assumed reinsurance and evaluates the financial strength of counterparties to its reinsurance agreements using criteria similar to that evaluated in the security impairment process discussed previously.

Cessions under reinsurance agreements do not discharge the Company’s obligations as the primary insurer.

Employee Benefit Plans

Eligible employees, sales representatives and retirees of the Company are provided pension, postretirement and postemployment benefits under plans sponsored and administered by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MLIC”), an affiliate of the Company. The Company’s obligation and expense related to these benefits is limited to the amount of associated expense allocated from MLIC.

49

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Foreign Currency

Assets, liabilities and operations of foreign affiliates and subsidiaries are recorded based on the functional currency of each entity. The determination of the functional currency is made based on the appropriate economic and management indicators. The local currencies of foreign operations are the functional currencies. Assets and liabilities of foreign affiliates and subsidiaries are translated from the functional currency to U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at each year-end and income and expense accounts are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. The resulting translation adjustments are charged or credited directly to other comprehensive income or loss, net of applicable taxes. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions, including the effect of re-measurement of monetary assets and liabilities to the appropriate functional currency, are reported as part of net investment gains (losses) in the period in which they occur.

Discontinued Operations

The results of operations of a component of the Company that either has been disposed of or is classified as held-for-sale are reported in discontinued operations if the operations and cash flows of the component have been or will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of the Company as a result of the disposal transaction and the Company will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction.

Litigation Contingencies

The Company is a party to a number of legal actions and is involved in a number of regulatory investigations. Given the inherent unpredictability of these matters, it is difficult to estimate the impact on the Company’s financial position. Liabilities are established when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal costs are recognized in other expenses as incurred. On a quarterly and annual basis, the Company reviews relevant information with respect to liabilities for litigation, regulatory investigations and litigation-related contingencies to be reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. It is possible that an adverse outcome in certain of the Company’s litigation and regulatory investigations, or the use of different assumptions in the determination of amounts recorded, could have a material effect upon the Company’s consolidated net income or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.

Separate Accounts

Separate accounts are established in conformity with insurance laws and are generally not chargeable with liabilities that arise from any other business of the Company. Separate account assets are subject to general account claims only to the extent the value of such assets exceeds the separate account liabilities. Assets within the Company’s separate accounts primarily include: mutual funds, fixed maturity and equity securities, mortgage loans, derivatives, hedge funds, other limited partnership interests, short-term investments and cash and cash equivalents. The Company reports separately, as assets and liabilities, investments held in separate accounts and liabilities of the separate accounts if (i) such separate accounts are legally recognized; (ii) assets supporting the contract liabilities are legally insulated from the Company’s general account liabilities; (iii) investments are directed by the contractholder; and (iv) all investment performance, net of contract fees and assessments, is passed through to the contractholder. The Company reports separate account assets meeting such criteria at their fair value which is based on the estimated fair values of the underlying assets comprising the portfolios of an individual separate account. Investment performance (including investment income, net investment gains (losses) and changes in unrealized gains (losses)) and the corresponding amounts credited to contractholders of such separate accounts are offset within the same line in the consolidated statements of operations. Separate accounts credited with a contractual investment return are combined on a line-by-line basis with the Company’s general

50

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

account assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the accounting for these investments is consistent with the methodologies described herein for similar financial instruments held within the general account. Unit-linked separate account investments which are directed by contractholders but do not meet one or more of the other above criteria are included in other securities.

The Company’s revenues reflect fees charged to the separate accounts, including mortality charges, risk charges, policy administration fees, investment management fees and surrender charges. Such fees are included in universal life and investment type product policy fees in the consolidated statements of operations.

Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements

Financial Instruments

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance regarding effective control in repurchase agreements. The guidance removes from the assessment of effective control the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Effective July 1, 2011, the Company adopted new guidance regarding accounting for troubled debt restructurings. This guidance clarifies whether a creditor has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties for the purpose of determining when a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. Additionally, the guidance prohibits creditors from using the borrower’s effective rate test to evaluate whether a concession has been granted to the borrower. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. See also expanded disclosures in Note 2.

Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted new guidance regarding accounting for investment funds determined to be VIEs. Under this guidance, an insurance entity would not be required to consolidate a voting-interest investment fund when it holds the majority of the voting interests of the fund through its separate accounts. In addition, an insurance entity would not consider the interests held through separate accounts for the benefit of policyholders in the insurer’s evaluation of its economic interest in a VIE, unless the separate account contractholder is a related party. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Effective December 31, 2010, the Company adopted guidance regarding disclosures about the credit quality of financing receivables and valuation allowances for credit losses, including credit quality indicators. Such disclosures must be disaggregated by portfolio segment or class based on how a company develops its valuation allowances for credit losses and how it manages its credit exposure. The Company has provided all material required disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

Effective July 1, 2010, the Company adopted guidance regarding accounting for embedded credit derivatives within structured securities. This guidance clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements. Specifically, embedded credit derivatives resulting only from subordination of one financial instrument to another continue to qualify for the scope exception. Embedded credit derivative features other than subordination must be analyzed to determine whether they require bifurcation and separate accounting. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted guidance related to financial instrument transfers and consolidation of VIEs. The financial instrument transfer guidance eliminates the concept of a qualified special purpose entity (“QSPE”), eliminates the guaranteed mortgage securitization exception, changes the criteria for

51

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

achieving sale accounting when transferring a financial asset and changes the initial recognition of retained beneficial interests. The new consolidation guidance changes the definition of the primary beneficiary, as well as the method of determining whether an entity is a primary beneficiary of a VIE from a quantitative model to a qualitative model. Under the new qualitative model, the entity that has both the ability to direct the most significant activities of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits that could be significant to the VIE is considered to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The guidance requires a quarterly reassessment, as well as enhanced disclosures, including the effects of a company’s involvement with VIEs on its financial statements.

As a result of the adoption of this guidance, the Company consolidated certain former QSPEs that were previously accounted for as fixed maturity CMBS. The Company also elected FVO for all of the consolidated assets and liabilities of these entities. Upon consolidation, the Company recorded $6.8 billion of commercial mortgage loans and $6.7 billion of long-term debt based on estimated fair values at January 1, 2010 and de-recognized $52 million in fixed maturity securities. The consolidation also resulted in a decrease in retained earnings of $34 million, net of income tax, and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) of $34 million, net of income tax, at January 1, 2010. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company recorded $411 million of net investment income on the consolidated assets, $402 million of interest expense in other expenses on the related long-term debt, and $24 million in net investment gains (losses) to remeasure the assets and liabilities at their estimated fair values.

Also effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted guidance that indefinitely defers the above changes relating to the Company’s interests in entities that have all the attributes of an investment company or for which it is industry practice to apply measurement principles for financial reporting that are consistent with those applied by an investment company. As a result of the deferral, the above guidance did not apply to certain real estate joint ventures and other limited partnership interests held by the Company.

Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted OTTI guidance. This guidance amends the previously used methodology for determining whether an OTTI exists for fixed maturity securities, changes the presentation of OTTI for fixed maturity securities and requires additional disclosures for OTTI on fixed maturity and equity securities in interim and annual financial statements. The Company’s net cumulative effect adjustment of adopting the OTTI guidance was an increase of $22 million to retained earnings with a corresponding increase to accumulated other comprehensive loss to reclassify the noncredit loss portion of previously recognized OTTI losses on fixed maturity securities held at April 1, 2009. This cumulative effect adjustment was comprised of an increase in the amortized cost basis of fixed maturity securities of $36 million, net of policyholder related amounts of $2 million and net of deferred income taxes of $12 million, resulting in the net cumulative effect adjustment of $22 million. The increase in the amortized cost basis of fixed maturity securities of $36 million by sector was as follows: $17 million — ABS, $6 million — U.S. corporate securities and $13 million — CMBS. As a result of the adoption of the OTTI guidance, the Company’s pre-tax earnings for the year ended December 31, 2009 increased by $148 million, offset by an increase in other comprehensive loss representing OTTI relating to noncredit losses recognized during the year ended December 31, 2009.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted guidance on disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging. This guidance requires enhanced qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments and disclosures about credit risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The Company has provided all of the material disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted prospectively an update on accounting for transfers of financial assets and repurchase financing transactions. This update provides guidance for evaluating whether to

52

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

account for a transfer of a financial asset and repurchase financing as a single transaction or as two separate transactions. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Business Combinations and Noncontrolling Interests

Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted new guidance that addresses when a business combination should be assumed to have occurred for the purpose of providing pro forma disclosure. Under the new guidance, if an entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. The guidance also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include additional narratives. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted revised guidance on business combinations and accounting for noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements. Under this guidance:

• All business combinations (whether full, partial or “step” acquisitions) result in all assets and liabilities of an acquired business being recorded at fair value, with limited exceptions.

• Acquisition costs are generally expensed as incurred; restructuring costs associated with a business combination are generally expensed as incurred subsequent to the acquisition date.

• The fair value of the purchase price, including the issuance of equity securities, is determined on the acquisition date.

• Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies are recognized at fair value if the acquisition-date fair value can be reasonably determined. If the fair value is not estimable, an asset or liability is recorded if existence or incurrence at the acquisition date is probable and its amount is reasonably estimable.

• Changes in deferred income tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally affect income tax expense.

• Noncontrolling interests (formerly known as “minority interests”) are valued at fair value at the acquisition date and are presented as equity rather than liabilities.

• Net income (loss) includes amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests.

• When control is attained on previously noncontrolling interests, the previously held equity interests are remeasured at fair value and a gain or loss is recognized.

• Purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change in control are accounted for as equity transactions.

• When control is lost in a partial disposition, realized gains or losses are recorded on equity ownership sold and the remaining ownership interest is remeasured and holding gains or losses are recognized.

As the Company did not have a minority interest, the adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted prospectively guidance on determination of the useful life of intangible assets. This guidance amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. This change is intended to improve

53

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset and the period of expected future cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset. The Company determines useful lives and provides all of the material disclosures prospectively on intangible assets acquired on or after January 1, 2009 in accordance with this guidance.

Fair Value

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance regarding fair value measurements that establishes common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Some of the amendments clarify the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) intent on the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. Other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted guidance that requires disclosures about significant transfers into and/or out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and activity in Level 3. In addition, this guidance provides clarification of existing disclosure requirements about level of disaggregation and inputs and valuation techniques. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The following pronouncements relating to fair value had no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements:

• Effective January 1, 2009, the Company implemented fair value measurements guidance for certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis. This guidance applies to such items as: (i) nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities initially measured at estimated fair value in a business combination; (ii) reporting units measured at estimated fair value in the first step of a goodwill impairment test; and (iii) indefinite-lived intangible assets measured at estimated fair value for impairment assessment.

• Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted prospectively guidance on issuer’s accounting for liabilities measured at fair value with a third-party credit enhancement. This guidance states that an issuer of a liability with a third-party credit enhancement should not include the effect of the credit enhancement in the fair value measurement of the liability. In addition, it requires disclosures about the existence of any third-party credit enhancement related to liabilities that are measured at fair value.

• Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted guidance on: (i) estimating the fair value of an asset or liability if there was a significant decrease in the volume and level of trading activity for these assets or liabilities; and (ii) identifying transactions that are not orderly. The Company has provided all of the material disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

• Effective December 31, 2009, the Company adopted guidance on: (i) measuring the fair value of investments in certain entities that calculate NAV per share; (ii) how investments within its scope would be classified in the fair value hierarchy; and (iii) enhanced disclosure requirements, for both interim and annual periods, about the nature and risks of investments measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis.

• Effective December 31, 2009, the Company adopted guidance on measuring liabilities at fair value. This guidance provides clarification for measuring fair value in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available. In such circumstances a company is required to

54

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

measure fair value using either a valuation technique that uses: (i) the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset; or (ii) quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets; or (iii) another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of fair value measurement such as an income approach (e.g., present value technique) or a market approach (e.g., “entry” value technique).

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs

On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance regarding accounting for DAC, which was applied retrospectively. The guidance specifies that only costs related directly to successful acquisition of new or renewal contracts can be capitalized as DAC; all other acquisition-related costs must be expensed as incurred. Under the new guidance, advertising costs may only be included in DAC if the capitalization criteria in the direct-response advertising guidance in Subtopic 340-20,Other Assets and Deferred Costs—Capitalized Advertising Costs, are met. As a result, certain direct marketing, sales manager compensation and administrative costs previously capitalized by the Company will no longer be deferred.

The following table presents the effects of the retrospective application of the adoption of such new accounting guidance to the Company’s previously reported consolidated balance sheets:

	As Previously Reported				Adjustment						As Adjusted
	December 31,				December 31,						December 31,
	2011		2010		2011			2010			2011		2010
	(In millions)
Assets
Other invested assets, principally at estimated fair value	$	3,373	$	1,716	$	(19	)	$	(9	)	$	3,354	$	1,707
Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired (1)	$	4,876	$	5,099	$	(688	)	$	(708	)	$	4,188	$	4,391
Deferred income tax assets	$	—	$	356	$	—		$	245		$	—	$	601
Liabilities
Deferred income tax liability	$	1,172	$	—	$	(237	)	$	—		$	935	$	—
Equity
Retained earnings	$	1,657	$	934	$	(484	)	$	(477	)	$	1,173	$	457
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	$	1,757	$	212	$	14		$	5		$	1,771	$	217
Total stockholders’ equity	$	10,173	$	7,951	$	(470	)	$	(472	)	$	9,703	$	7,479

(1) Value of business acquired was not impacted by the adoption of this guidance.

The following table presents the effects of the retrospective application of the adoption of such new accounting guidance to the Company’s previously reported consolidated statements of operations:

	As Previously Reported							Adjustment									As Adjusted
	Years Ended December 31,							Years Ended December 31,									Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009			2011			2010			2009			2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Revenues
Net investment income	$	3,083	$	3,157	$	2,335		$	(9	)	$	(4	)	$	(2	)	$	3,074	$	3,153	$	2,333
Expenses
Other expenses	$	2,919	$	2,321	$	1,207		$	(4	)	$	51		$	127		$	2,915	$	2,372	$	1,334
Income (loss) before provision for income tax	$	1,761	$	1,077	$	(814	)	$	(5	)	$	(55	)	$	(129	)	$	1,756	$	1,022	$	(943	)
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)	$	521	$	320	$	(368	)	$	2		$	(17	)	$	(43	)	$	523	$	303	$	(411	)
Net income (loss)	$	1,240	$	757	$	(446	)	$	(7	)	$	(38	)	$	(86	)	$	1,233	$	719	$	(532	)

55

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The following table presents the effects of the retrospective application of the adoption of such new accounting guidance to the Company’s previously reported consolidated statements of cash flows:

	As Previously Reported						Adjustment						As Adjusted
	Years Ended December 31,						Years Ended December 31,						Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009		2011		2010		2009		2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	1,240	$	757	$	(446)	$	(7)	$	(38)	$	(86)	$	1,233	$	719	$	(532)
Change in deferred policy acquisition costs, net	$	(182)	$	(138)	$	(559)	$	(5)	$	51	$	127	$	(187)	$	(87)	$	(432)
Change in income tax recoverable (payable)	$	565	$	208	$	(303)	$	2	$	(17)	$	(43)	$	567	$	191	$	(346)
Cash flows from investing activities
Net change in other invested assets	$	(22)	$	(194)	$	16	$	10	$	4	$	2	$	(12)	$	(190)	$	18

Other Pronouncements

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance regarding comprehensive income that defers the effective date pertaining to reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments in this guidance are being made to allow the FASB time to re-deliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. All other requirements in the new comprehensive income standard are not affected by this guidance, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements on an annual basis.

On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance regarding comprehensive income, which was applied retrospectively, that provides companies with the option to present the total of comprehensive income, components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements in annual financial statements. The objective of the standard is to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income and to facilitate convergence of GAAP and IFRS. The standard eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments in this guidance do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified in net income. The Company adopted the two-statement approach for annual statements.

Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance on goodwill impairment testing that simplifies how an entity tests goodwill for impairment. This new guidance allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value as a basis for determining whether it needs to perform the quantitative two-step goodwill impairment test. Only if an entity determines, based on qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying value will it be required to calculate the fair value of the reporting unit. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, 2011, the Company adopted new guidance regarding goodwill impairment testing. This guidance modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity would be required to perform Step 2 of the test if qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

56

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted prospectively guidance which establishes general standards for accounting and disclosures of events that occur subsequent to the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or available to be issued. The Company has provided all of the material disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

Future Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2011, the FASB issued new guidance regarding balance sheet offsetting disclosures (Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-11,Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities), effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The guidance should be applied retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The amendments in ASU 2011-11 require an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effects of those arrangements on its financial position. Entities are required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The objective of ASU 2011-11 is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In December 2011, the FASB issued new guidance regarding derecognition of in substance real estate (ASU 2011-10Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360): Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate - a Scope Clarification (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after June 15, 2012. The amendments should be applied prospectively to deconsolidation events occurring after the effective date. Under the amendments in ASU 2011-10, when a parent ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate as a result of a default on the subsidiary’s nonrecourse debt, the reporting entity should apply the guidance in Subtopic 360-20 to determine whether it should derecognize the in substance real estate. Generally, a reporting entity would not satisfy the requirements to derecognize in substance real estate before the legal transfer of the real estate to the lender and the extinguishment of the related nonrecourse indebtedness. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

57

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

2. Investments

Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Available-for-Sale

The following tables present the cost or amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, estimated fair value of fixed maturity and equity securities and the percentage that each sector represents by the respective total holdings for the periods shown. The unrealized loss amounts presented below include the noncredit loss component of OTTI losses:

	December 31, 2011
	Cost or Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized						Estimated Fair Value		% of Total
			Gains		Temporary Losses		OTTI Losses
	(In millions)
Fixed Maturity Securities:
U.S. corporate securities	$	16,018	$	1,550	$	229	$	—	$	17,339		36.3	%
Foreign corporate securities		7,958		649		114		—		8,493		17.8
U.S. Treasury and agency securities		6,832		1,217		1		—		8,048		16.8
RMBS		6,478		330		189		125		6,494		13.6
CMBS		2,128		115		16		—		2,227		4.7
State and political subdivision securities		1,891		222		58		—		2,055		4.3
ABS		1,875		45		42		—		1,878		3.9
Foreign government securities		1,035		215		3		—		1,247		2.6
Total fixed maturity securities	$	44,215	$	4,343	$	652	$	125	$	47,781		100.0	%
Equity Securities:
Common stock	$	148	$	11	$	13	$	—	$	146		57.9	%
Non-redeemable preferred stock		147		3		44		—		106		42.1
Total equity securities	$	295	$	14	$	57	$	—	$	252		100.0	%

58

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

	December 31, 2010
	Cost or Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized						Estimated Fair Value		% of Total
			Gains		Temporary Losses		OTTI Losses
	(In millions)
Fixed Maturity Securities:
U.S. corporate securities	$	14,860	$	816	$	302	$	—	$	15,374		34.2	%
Foreign corporate securities		8,095		502		127		—		8,470		18.8
U.S. Treasury and agency securities		7,665		143		132		—		7,676		17.1
RMBS		7,101		203		260		88		6,956		15.5
CMBS		2,203		113		39		—		2,277		5.1
State and political subdivision securities		1,755		22		131		—		1,646		3.7
ABS (1)		1,629		44		53		(2)		1,622		3.6
Foreign government securities		824		81		2		—		903		2.0
Total fixed maturity securities	$	44,132	$	1,924	$	1,046	$	86	$	44,924		100.0	%
Equity Securities:
Common stock	$	121	$	17	$	1	$	—	$	137		33.8	%
Non-redeemable preferred stock		306		9		47		—		268		66.2
Total equity securities	$	427	$	26	$	48	$	—	$	405		100.0	%

(1) OTTI losses as presented above represent the noncredit portion of OTTI losses that is included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). OTTI losses include both the initial recognition of noncredit losses, and the effects of subsequent increases and decreases in estimated fair value for those fixed maturity securities that were previously noncredit loss impaired. The noncredit loss component of OTTI losses for ABS was in an unrealized gain (loss) position of $2 million at December 31, 2010 due to increases in estimated fair value subsequent to initial recognition of noncredit losses on such securities. See also “—Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses).”

Within fixed maturity securities, a reclassification from the ABS sector to the RMBS sector has been made to the prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation for securities backed by sub-prime residential mortgage loans to be consistent with market convention relating to the risks inherent in such securities and the Company’s management of its investments within these asset sectors.

The Company held non-income producing fixed maturity securities with an estimated fair value of $5 million and $36 million with unrealized gains (losses) of ($2) million and $2 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The Company held foreign currency derivatives with notional amounts of $946 million and $807 million to hedge the exchange rate risk associated with foreign denominated fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Concentrations of Credit Risk (Fixed Maturity Securities) — Summary. The following section contains a summary of the concentrations of credit risk related to fixed maturity securities holdings.

59

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The Company was not exposed to any concentrations of credit risk of any single issuer greater than 10% of the Company’s stockholders’ equity, other than the government securities summarized in the table below.

Concentrations of Credit Risk (Government and Agency Securities). The following section contains a summary of the concentrations of credit risk related to government and agency fixed maturity and fixed-income securities holdings, which were greater than 10% of the Company’s stockholders’ equity at:

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	Carrying Value (1)
	(In millions)
U.S. Treasury and agency fixed maturity securities	$	8,048	$	7,676
U.S. Treasury and agency fixed-income securities included in:
Short-term investments	$	2,186	$	935
Cash equivalents	$	108	$	1,287

(1) Represents estimated fair value for fixed maturity securities and for short-term investments and cash equivalents, estimated fair value or amortized cost, which approximates estimated fair value.

Concentrations of Credit Risk (Equity Securities). The Company was not exposed to any concentrations of credit risk in its equity securities holdings of any single issuer greater than 10% of the Company’s stockholders’ equity or 1% of total investments at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Maturities of Fixed Maturity Securities. The amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed maturity securities, by contractual maturity date (excluding scheduled sinking funds), were as follows at:

	December 31,
	2011				2010
	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value
	(In millions)
Due in one year or less	$	2,946	$	2,970	$	1,874	$	1,889
Due after one year through five years		8,648		9,022		9,340		9,672
Due after five years through ten years		7,905		8,606		7,829		8,333
Due after ten years		14,235		16,584		14,156		14,175
Subtotal		33,734		37,182		33,199		34,069
RMBS, CMBS and ABS		10,481		10,599		10,933		10,855
Total fixed maturity securities	$	44,215	$	47,781	$	44,132	$	44,924

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to the exercise of call or prepayment options. Fixed maturity securities not due at a single maturity date have been included in the above table in the year of final contractual maturity. RMBS, CMBS and ABS are shown separately in the table, as they are not due at a single maturity.

Evaluating Available-for-Sale Securities for Other-Than-Temporary Impairment

As described more fully in Note 1, the Company performs a regular evaluation, on a security-by-security basis, of its available-for-sale securities holdings, including fixed maturity securities, equity securities and perpetual hybrid securities, in accordance with its impairment policy in order to evaluate whether such investments are other-than-temporarily impaired.

60

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses)

The components of net unrealized investment gains (losses), included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), were as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Fixed maturity securities	$	3,690	$	878	$	(1,019)
Fixed maturity securities with noncredit OTTI losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(125)		(86)		(141)
Total fixed maturity securities		3,565		792		(1,160)
Equity securities		(41)		(21)		(35)
Derivatives		239		(109)		(4)
Short-term investments		(2)		(2)		(10)
Other		(5)		(3)		(3)
Subtotal		3,756		657		(1,212)
Amounts allocated from:
Insurance liability loss recognition		(325)		(33)		—
DAC and VOBA related to noncredit OTTI losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		9		5		12
DAC and VOBA		(509)		(119)		146
Subtotal		(825)		(147)		158
Deferred income tax benefit (expense) related to noncredit OTTI losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		42		30		46
Deferred income tax benefit (expense)		(1,063)		(198)		328
Net unrealized investment gains (losses)	$	1,910	$	342	$	(680)

The changes in fixed maturity securities with noncredit OTTI losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), were as follows:

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Balance, beginning of period	$	(86)	$	(141)
Noncredit OTTI losses recognized (1)		5		(53)
Transferred to retained earnings (2)		—		16
Securities sold with previous noncredit OTTI loss		26		28
Subsequent changes in estimated fair value		(70)		64
Balance, end of period	$	(125)	$	(86)

(1) Noncredit OTTI losses recognized, net of DAC, were $8 million and ($44) million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

(2) Amounts transferred to retained earnings were in connection with the adoption of guidance related to the consolidation of VIEs as described in Note 1.

61

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The changes in net unrealized investment gains (losses) were as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Balance, beginning of period	$	342	$	(680)	$	(2,682)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of income tax		—		34		(39)
Fixed maturity securities on which noncredit OTTI losses have been recognized		(39)		39		(105)
Unrealized investment gains (losses) during the year		3,138		1,778		3,974
Unrealized investment gains (losses) relating to:
Insurance liability gain (loss) recognition		(292)		(33)		—
DAC and VOBA related to noncredit OTTI losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		4		(7)		10
DAC and VOBA		(390)		(265)		(744)
Deferred income tax benefit (expense) related to noncredit OTTI losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		12		(11)		34
Deferred income tax benefit (expense)		(865)		(513)		(1,128)
Balance, end of period	$	1,910	$	342	$	(680)
Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses)	$	1,568	$	1,022	$	2,002

62

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Continuous Gross Unrealized Losses and OTTI Losses for Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Available-for-Sale by Sector

The following tables present the estimated fair value and gross unrealized losses of fixed maturity and equity securities in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by sector and by length of time that the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position. The unrealized loss amounts presented below include the noncredit component of OTTI loss. Fixed maturity securities on which a noncredit OTTI loss has been recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are categorized by length of time as being “less than 12 months” or “equal to or greater than 12 months” in a continuous unrealized loss position based on the point in time that the estimated fair value initially declined to below the amortized cost basis and not the period of time since the unrealized loss was deemed a noncredit OTTI loss.

	December 31, 2011
	Less than 12 Months				Equal to or Greater than 12 Months				Total
	Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In millions, except number of securities)
Fixed Maturity Securities:
U.S. corporate securities	$	1,699	$	71	$	786	$	158	$	2,485	$	229
Foreign corporate securities		1,213		68		162		46		1,375		114
U.S. Treasury and agency securities		118		—		20		1		138		1
RMBS		784		114		972		200		1,756		314
CMBS		152		4		111		12		263		16
State and political subdivision securities		6		—		367		58		373		58
ABS		803		12		261		30		1,064		42
Foreign government securities		70		3		4		—		74		3
Total fixed maturity securities	$	4,845	$	272	$	2,683	$	505	$	7,528	$	777
Equity Securities:
Common stock	$	35	$	13	$	—	$	—	$	35	$	13
Non-redeemable preferred stock		32		16		59		28		91		44
Total equity securities	$	67	$	29	$	59	$	28	$	126	$	57
Total number of securities in an unrealized loss position		808				479

63

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

	December 31, 2010
	Less than 12 Months				Equal to or Greater than 12 Months				Total
	Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In millions, except number of securities)
Fixed Maturity Securities:
U.S. corporate securities	$	1,956	$	56	$	1,800	$	246	$	3,756	$	302
Foreign corporate securities		727		24		816		103		1,543		127
U.S. Treasury and agency securities		2,857		113		85		19		2,942		132
RMBS		2,235		62		1,606		286		3,841		348
CMBS		68		1		237		38		305		39
State and political subdivision securities		716		36		352		95		1,068		131
ABS		238		2		352		49		590		51
Foreign government securities		49		1		9		1		58		2
Total fixed maturity securities	$	8,846	$	295	$	5,257	$	837	$	14,103	$	1,132
Equity Securities:
Common stock	$	9	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	9	$	1
Non-redeemable preferred stock		26		5		187		42		213		47
Total equity securities	$	35	$	6	$	187	$	42	$	222	$	48
Total number of securities in an unrealized loss position		759				637

64

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Aging of Gross Unrealized Losses and OTTI Losses for Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Available-for-Sale

The following tables present the cost or amortized cost, gross unrealized losses, including the portion of OTTI loss on fixed maturity securities recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), gross unrealized losses as a percentage of cost or amortized cost and number of securities for fixed maturity and equity securities where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below cost or amortized cost by less than 20%, or 20% or more at:

	December 31, 2011
	Cost or Amortized Cost				Gross Unrealized Losses						Number of Securities
	Less than    20%		20% or    more		Less than    20%			20% or    more			Less than    20%		20% or    more
	(In millions, except number of securities)
Fixed Maturity Securities:
Less than six months	$	4,205	$	762	$	137		$	213			652		81
Six months or greater but less than nine months		507		137		36			42			91		13
Nine months or greater but less than twelve months		131		24		8			6			21		4
Twelve months or greater		2,180		359		197			138			373		40
Total	$	7,023	$	1,282	$	378		$	399
Percentage of amortized cost						5	%		31	%
Equity Securities:
Less than six months	$	59	$	85	$	6		$	42			17		11
Six months or greater but less than nine months		—		—		—			—			—		—
Nine months or greater but less than twelve months		8		—		1			—			1		—
Twelve months or greater		14		17		1			7			6		4
Total	$	81	$	102	$	8		$	49
Percentage of cost						10	%		48	%

65

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

	December 31, 2010
	Cost or Amortized Cost				Gross Unrealized Losses						Number of Securities
	Less than    20%		20% or    more		Less than    20%			20% or    more			Less than    20%		20% or    more
	(In millions, except number of securities)
Fixed Maturity Securities:
Less than six months	$	8,882	$	439	$	268		$	109			686		43
Six months or greater but less than nine months		152		40		6			13			30		10
Nine months or greater but less than twelve months		48		25		2			11			11		3
Twelve months or greater		4,768		881		450			273			475		101
Total	$	13,850	$	1,385	$	726		$	406
Percentage of amortized cost						5	%		29	%
Equity Securities:
Less than six months	$	31	$	30	$	4		$	7			8		12
Six months or greater but less than nine months		—		3		—			1			—		1
Nine months or greater but less than twelve months		5		7		—			2			1		1
Twelve months or greater		150		44		18			16			12		5
Total	$	186	$	84	$	22		$	26
Percentage of cost						12	%		31	%

Equity securities with gross unrealized losses of 20% or more for twelve months or greater decreased from $16 million at December 31, 2010 to $7 million at December 31, 2011. As shown in the section “— Evaluating Temporarily Impaired Available-for-Sale Securities” below, all of the equity securities with gross unrealized losses of 20% or more for twelve months or greater at December 31, 2011 were financial services industry investment grade non-redeemable preferred stock, of which 29% were rated A or better.

66

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Concentration of Gross Unrealized Losses and OTTI Losses for Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Available-for-Sale

The gross unrealized losses related to fixed maturity and equity securities, including the portion of OTTI losses on fixed maturity securities recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were $834 million and $1.2 billion at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The concentration, calculated as a percentage of gross unrealized losses (including OTTI losses), by sector and industry was as follows at:

	December 31,
	2011			2010
Sector:
RMBS		38	%		30	%
U.S. corporate securities		27			26
Foreign corporate securities		14			11
State and political subdivision securities		7			11
ABS		5			4
CMBS		2			3
U.S. Treasury and agency securities		—			11
Other		7			4
Total		100	%		100	%
Industry:
Mortgage-backed		40	%		33	%
Finance		24			19
State and political subdivision securities		7			11
Consumer		7			5
Asset-backed		5			4
Communications		4			2
Utility		3			3
Industrial		1			1
U.S. Treasury and agency securities		—			11
Other		9			11
Total		100	%		100	%

Evaluating Temporarily Impaired Available-for-Sale Securities

The following table presents fixed maturity and equity securities, each with gross unrealized losses of greater than $10 million, the number of securities, total gross unrealized losses and percentage of total gross unrealized losses at:

	December 31,
	2011				2010
	Fixed Maturity   Securities		Equity   Securities		Fixed Maturity   Securities		Equity   Securities
	(In millions, except number of securities)
Number of securities		9		1		15		—
Total gross unrealized losses	$	152	$	12	$	210	$	—
Percentage of total gross unrealized losses		20 %		22 %		19 %		— %

67

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Fixed maturity and equity securities, each with gross unrealized losses greater than $10 million, decreased $46 million during the year ended December 31, 2011. The decline in, or improvement in, gross unrealized losses for the year ended December 31, 2011, was primarily attributable to a decrease in interest rates, partially offset by widening credit spreads. These securities were included in the Company’s OTTI review process.

As of December 31, 2011, $186 million of unrealized losses were from fixed maturity securities with an unrealized loss position of 20% or more of amortized cost for six months or greater. Of the $186 million, $124 million, or 67%, are related to unrealized losses on investment grade securities. Unrealized losses on investment grade securities are principally related to widening credit spreads or rising interest rates since purchase. Of the $186 million, $62 million, or 33%, are related to unrealized losses on below investment grade securities. Unrealized losses on below investment grade securities are principally related to RMBS (primarily alternative residential mortgage loans), and U.S. and foreign corporate securities (primarily industrial, financial services and utility industry securities) and were the result of significantly wider credit spreads resulting from higher risk premiums since purchase, largely due to economic and market uncertainties including concerns over the financial services industry sector, unemployment levels and valuations of residential real estate supporting non-agency RMBS. As explained further in Note 1, management evaluates these U.S. and foreign corporate securities based on factors such as expected cash flows and the financial condition and near-term and long-term prospects of the issuer; and evaluates non-agency RMBS based on actual and projected cash flows after considering the quality of underlying collateral, expected prepayment speeds, current and forecasted loss severity, consideration of the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security, and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security. See “— Aging of Gross Unrealized Losses and OTTI Losses for Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Available-for-Sale” for a discussion of equity securities with an unrealized loss position of 20% or more of cost for 12 months or greater.

In the Company’s impairment review process, the duration and severity of an unrealized loss position for equity securities are given greater weight and consideration than for fixed maturity securities. An extended and severe unrealized loss position on a fixed maturity security may not have any impact on the ability of the issuer to service all scheduled interest and principal payments and the Company’s evaluation of recoverability of all contractual cash flows or the ability to recover an amount at least equal to its amortized cost based on the present value of the expected future cash flows to be collected. In contrast, for an equity security, greater weight and consideration are given by the Company to a decline in market value and the likelihood such market value decline will recover.

The following table presents certain information about the Company’s equity securities available-for-sale with gross unrealized losses of 20% or more at December 31, 2011:

			Non-Redeemable Preferred Stock
	All Equity Securities		All Types of Non-Redeemable Preferred Stock				Investment Grade
							All Industries				Financial Services Industry
	Gross Unrealized Losses		Gross Unrealized Losses		% of All Equity Securities		Gross Unrealized Losses		% of All Non-Redeemable Preferred Stock		Gross Unrealized Losses		% of All Industries		% A Rated or Better
	(In millions)						(In millions)				(In millions)
Less than six months	$	42	$	34		81 %	$	11		32 %	$	11		100 %		73 %
Six months or greater but less than twelve months		—		—		— %		—		— %		—		— %		— %
Twelve months or greater		7		7		100 %		7		100 %		7		100 %		29 %
All equity securities with gross unrealized losses of 20% or more	$	49	$	41		84 %	$	18		44 %	$	18		100 %		56 %

68

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

In connection with the equity securities impairment review process, the Company evaluated its holdings in non-redeemable preferred stock, particularly those in the financial services industry. The Company considered several factors including whether there has been any deterioration in credit of the issuer and the likelihood of recovery in value of non-redeemable preferred stock with a severe or an extended unrealized loss. The Company also considered whether any issuers of non-redeemable preferred stock with an unrealized loss held by the Company, regardless of credit rating, have deferred any dividend payments. No such dividend payments had been deferred.

With respect to common stock holdings, the Company considered the duration and severity of the unrealized losses for securities in an unrealized loss position of 20% or more; and the duration of unrealized losses for securities in an unrealized loss position of less than 20% in an extended unrealized loss position (i.e., 12 months or greater).

Based on the Company’s current evaluation of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position in accordance with its impairment policy, and the Company’s current intentions and assessments (as applicable to the type of security) about holding, selling and any requirements to sell these securities, the Company has concluded that these securities are not other-than-temporarily impaired.

Future OTTIs will depend primarily on economic fundamentals, issuer performance (including changes in the present value of future cash flows expected to be collected), changes in credit ratings, changes in collateral valuation, changes in interest rates and changes in credit spreads. If economic fundamentals or any of the above factors deteriorate, additional OTTIs may be incurred in upcoming quarters.

Other Securities

The table below presents certain information about the Company’s other securities.

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
FVO general account securities	$	49	$	7
FVO contractholder-directed unit-linked investments		3,616		2,240
Total other securities — at estimated fair value	$	3,665	$	2,247

See Note 1 for discussion of FVO contractholder-directed unit-linked investments. See “— Net Investment Income” for the net investment income recognized on other securities and the related changes in estimated fair value subsequent to purchase included in net investment income.

69

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Net Investment Gains (Losses)

The components of net investment gains (losses) were as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Total gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities:
Total OTTI losses recognized	$	(42)	$	(103)	$	(552)
Less: Noncredit portion of OTTI losses transferred to and recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)		(5)		53		165
Net OTTI losses on fixed maturity securities recognized in earnings		(47)		(50)		(387)
Fixed maturity securities — net gains (losses) on sales and disposals		81		123		(115)
Total gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities		34		73		(502)
Other net investment gains (losses):
Equity securities		(21)		28		(119)
Mortgage loans		26		(18)		(32)
Real estate and real estate joint ventures		(1)		(21)		(61)
Other limited partnership interests		(5)		(13)		(72)
Other investment portfolio gains (losses)		(9)		10		4
Subtotal — investment portfolio gains (losses)		24		59		(782)
FVO CSEs — changes in estimated fair value:
Commercial mortgage loans		(84)		758		—
Long-term debt — related to commercial mortgage loans		93		(734)		—
Other gains (losses)		2		67		(53)
Subtotal FVO CSEs and other gains (losses)		11		91		(53)
Total net investment gains (losses)	$	35	$	150	$	(835)

See “— Variable Interest Entities” for discussion of CSEs included in the table above.

See “— Related Party Investment Transactions” for discussion of affiliated net investment gains (losses) related to transfers of invested assets to affiliates.

Gains (losses) from foreign currency transactions included within net investment gains (losses) were ($7) million, $78 million and ($45) million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

70

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Proceeds from sales or disposals of fixed maturity and equity securities and the components of fixed maturity and equity securities net investment gains (losses) were as shown in the table below. Investment gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on a specific identification basis.

	Years Ended December 31,						Years Ended December 31,						Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009		2011		2010		2009		2011		2010		2009
	Fixed Maturity Securities						Equity Securities						Total
	(In millions)
Proceeds	$	11,634	$	12,434	$	8,766	$	190	$	109	$	113	$	11,824	$	12,543	$	8,879
Gross investment gains	$	182	$	244	$	180	$	9	$	31	$	6	$	191	$	275	$	186
Gross investment losses		(101)		(121)		(295)		(22)		(1)		(28)		(123)		(122)		(323)
Total OTTI losses recognized in earnings:
Credit-related		(38)		(47)		(348)		—		—		—		(38)		(47)		(348)
Other (1)		(9)		(3)		(39)		(8)		(2)		(97)		(17)		(5)		(136)
Total OTTI losses recognized in earnings		(47)		(50)		(387)		(8)		(2)		(97)		(55)		(52)		(484)
Net investment gains (losses)	$	34	$	73	$	(502)	$	(21)	$	28	$	(119)	$	13	$	101	$	(621)

(1) Other OTTI losses recognized in earnings include impairments on equity securities, impairments on perpetual hybrid securities classified within fixed maturity securities where the primary reason for the impairment was the severity and/or the duration of an unrealized loss position and fixed maturity securities where there is an intent to sell or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of the decline in estimated fair value.

Fixed maturity security OTTI losses recognized in earnings related to the following sectors and industries within the U.S. and foreign corporate securities sector:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Sector:
U.S. and foreign corporate securities — by industry:
Communications	$	11	$	4	$	88
Finance		9		7		84
Industrial		2		—		18
Consumer		—		10		53
Utility		—		2		6
Total U.S. and foreign corporate securities		22		23		249
RMBS		17		18		40
ABS		5		1		29
CMBS		3		8		69
Total	$	47	$	50	$	387

71

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Equity security OTTI losses recognized in earnings related to the following sectors and industries:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Sector:
Non-redeemable preferred stock	$	6	$	—	$	92
Common stock		2		2		5
Total	$	8	$	2	$	97
Industry:
Financial services industry:
Perpetual hybrid securities	$	6	$	—	$	72
Common and remaining non-redeemable preferred stock		—		—		3
Total financial services industry		6		—		75
Other industries		2		2		22
Total	$	8	$	2	$	97

Credit Loss Rollforward — Rollforward of the Cumulative Credit Loss Component of OTTI Loss Recognized in Earnings on Fixed Maturity Securities Still Held for Which a Portion of the OTTI Loss Was Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The table below presents a rollforward of the cumulative credit loss component of OTTI loss recognized in earnings on fixed maturity securities still held for which a portion of the OTTI loss was recognized in other comprehensive income (loss):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Balance, at January 1,	$	63	$	213
Additions:
Initial impairments — credit loss OTTI recognized on securities not previously impaired		6		11
Additional impairments — credit loss OTTI recognized on securities previously impaired		17		10
Reductions:
Sales (maturities, pay downs or prepayments) during the period of securities previously impaired as credit loss OTTI		(7)		(67)
Securities de-recognized in connection with the adoption of new guidance related to the consolidation of VIEs		—		(100)
Securities impaired to net present value of expected future cash flows		(22)		(1)
Increases in cash flows — accretion of previous credit loss OTTI		(2)		(3)
Balance, at December 31,	$	55	$	63

72

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Net Investment Income

The components of net investment income were as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010		2009
	(In millions)
Investment income:
Fixed maturity securities	$	2,147		$	2,120	$	2,094
Equity securities		10			16		27
Other securities — FVO general account securities (1)		1			—		—
Mortgage loans		347			301		239
Policy loans		63			67		80
Real estate and real estate joint ventures		24			(24)		(120)
Other limited partnership interests		176			190		17
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments		5			9		16
International joint ventures		(5)			(10)		(6)
Other		3			3		(2)
Subtotal		2,771			2,672		2,345
Less: Investment expenses		100			97		109
Subtotal, net		2,671			2,575		2,236
Other securities — FVO contractholder-directed unit-linked investments (1)		71			167		97
FVO CSEs — Commercial mortgage loans		332			411		—
Subtotal		403			578		97
Net investment income	$	3,074		$	3,153	$	2,333
(1)   Changes in estimated fair value subsequent to purchase for securities still held as of the end of the respective years included in net investment income were:
Other securities – FVO general account securities	$	2		$	—	$	1
Other securities – FVO contractholder-directed unit-linked investments	$	(11	)	$	121	$	89

See “— Variable Interest Entities” for discussion of CSEs included in the table above.

See “— Related Party Investment Transactions” for discussion of affiliated net investment income and service charges included in the table above.

Securities Lending

As described more fully in Note 1, the Company participates in a securities lending program whereby blocks of securities are loaned to third parties. These transactions are treated as financing arrangements and the associated cash collateral received is recorded as a liability. The Company is obligated to return the cash collateral received to its counterparties.

73

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Elements of the securities lending program are presented below at:

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Securities on loan: (1)
Amortized cost	$	5,307	$	6,992
Estimated fair value	$	6,451	$	7,054
Cash collateral on deposit from counterparties (2)	$	6,456	$	7,138
Security collateral on deposit from counterparties	$	137	$	—
Reinvestment portfolio — estimated fair value	$	6,295	$	6,916

(1) Included within fixed maturity securities and short-term investments.

(2) Included within payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions.

Security collateral on deposit from counterparties in connection with the securities lending transactions may not be sold or repledged, unless the counterparty is in default, and is not reflected in the consolidated financial statements.

Invested Assets on Deposit and Pledged as Collateral

Invested assets on deposit and pledged as collateral are presented in the table below at estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents and fixed maturity securities and at carrying value for mortgage loans.

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Invested assets on deposit (1)	$	51	$	55
Invested assets pledged as collateral (2)		897		525
Total invested assets on deposit and pledged as collateral	$	948	$	580

(1) The Company has invested assets on deposit with regulatory agencies consisting primarily of fixed maturity securities.

(2) The Company has pledged fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans and cash and cash equivalents in connection with various agreements and transactions, including funding agreements (see Note 7), and derivative transactions (see Note 3).

74

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Mortgage Loans

Mortgage loans are summarized as follows at:

	December 31,
	2011					2010
	Carrying Value		% of Total			Carrying Value		% of Total
	(In millions)					(In millions)
Mortgage loans:
Commercial	$	5,390		55.0	%	$	4,635		36.4	%
Agricultural		1,333		13.6			1,342		10.6
Subtotal		6,723		68.6			5,977		47.0
Valuation allowances		(61)		(0.6)			(87)		(0.7)
Subtotal mortgage loans, net		6,662		68.0			5,890		46.3
Commercial mortgage loans held by CSEs		3,138		32.0			6,840		53.7
Total mortgage loans, net	$	9,800		100.0	%	$	12,730		100.0	%

See “— Variable Interest Entities” for discussion of CSEs included in the table above and the decrease in commercial mortgage loans held by CSEs.

See “— Related Party Investment Transactions” for discussion of affiliated mortgage loans included in the table above.

The following tables present the recorded investment in mortgage loans, by portfolio segment, by method of evaluation of credit loss, and the related valuation allowances, by type of credit loss, at:

	Commercial		Agricultural		Total
	(In millions)
December 31, 2011:
Mortgage loans:
Evaluated individually for credit losses	$	23	$	—	$	23
Evaluated collectively for credit losses		5,367		1,333		6,700
Total mortgage loans		5,390		1,333		6,723
Valuation allowances:
Specific credit losses		15		—		15
Non-specifically identified credit losses		43		3		46
Total valuation allowances		58		3		61
Mortgage loans, net of valuation allowance	$	5,332	$	1,330	$	6,662
December 31, 2010:
Mortgage loans:
Evaluated individually for credit losses	$	23	$	—	$	23
Evaluated collectively for credit losses		4,612		1,342		5,954
Total mortgage loans		4,635		1,342		5,977
Valuation allowances:
Specific credit losses		23		—		23
Non-specifically identified credit losses		61		3		64
Total valuation allowances		84		3		87
Mortgage loans, net of valuation allowance	$	4,551	$	1,339	$	5,890

75

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The following tables present the changes in the valuation allowance, by portfolio segment:

	Mortgage Loan Valuation Allowances
	Commercial			Agricultural		Total
	(In millions)
Balance at January 1, 2009	$	44		$	2	$	46
Provision (release)		35			1		36
Charge-offs, net of recoveries		(5	)		—		(5	)
Balance at December 31, 2009		74			3		77
Provision (release)		16			—		16
Charge-offs, net of recoveries		(6	)		—		(6	)
Balance at December 31, 2010		84			3		87
Provision (release)		(26	)		—		(26	)
Charge-offs, net of recoveries		—			—		—
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	58		$	3	$	61

Commercial Mortgage Loans — by Credit Quality Indicators with Estimated Fair Value.  See Note 1 for a discussion of all credit quality indicators presented herein. Presented below for the commercial mortgage loans is the recorded investment, prior to valuation allowances, by the indicated loan-to-value ratio categories and debt service coverage ratio categories and estimated fair value of such mortgage loans by the indicated loan-to-value ratio categories at:

	Commercial
	Recorded Investment
	Debt Service Coverage Ratios											Estimated Fair  Value		% of Total
	> 1.20x		1.00x - 1.20x		< 1.00x		Total		% of Total
			(In millions)									(In millions)
December 31, 2011:
Loan-to-value ratios:
Less than 65%	$	3,324	$	135	$	210	$	3,669		68.1	%	$	3,888		69.9	%
65% to 75%		719		54		52		825		15.3			852		15.3
76% to 80%		199		—		26		225		4.2			221		4.0
Greater than 80%		452		181		38		671		12.4			602		10.8
Total	$	4,694	$	370	$	326	$	5,390		100.0	%	$	5,563		100.0	%
December 31, 2010:
Loan-to-value ratios:
Less than 65%	$	2,051	$	11	$	34	$	2,096		45.2	%	$	2,196		47.1	%
65% to 75%		824		99		148		1,071		23.1			1,099		23.6
76% to 80%		301		29		7		337		7.3			347		7.4
Greater than 80%		828		163		140		1,131		24.4			1,018		21.9
Total	$	4,004	$	302	$	329	$	4,635		100.0	%	$	4,660		100.0	%

76

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Agricultural Mortgage Loans — by Credit Quality Indicator.  The recorded investment in agricultural mortgage loans, prior to valuation allowances, by credit quality indicator, is as shown below. The estimated fair value of agricultural mortgage loans was $1.4 billion at both December 31, 2011 and 2010.

	Agricultural
	December 31,
	2011					2010
	Recorded Investment		% of Total			Recorded Investment		% of Total
	(In millions)					(In millions)
Loan-to-value ratios:
Less than 65%	$	1,129		84.7	%	$	1,289		96.0	%
65% to 75%		142		10.7			53		4.0
76% to 80%		62		4.6			—		—
Total	$	1,333		100.0	%	$	1,342		100.0	%

Past Due and Interest Accrual Status of Mortgage Loans.  The Company has a high quality, well performing, mortgage loan portfolio, with approximately 99% of all mortgage loans classified as performing at both December 31, 2011 and 2010. The Company defines delinquent mortgage loans consistent with industry practice, when interest and principal payments are past due as follows: commercial mortgage loans — 60 days or more; and agricultural mortgage loans — 90 days or more. The recorded investment in mortgage loans, prior to valuation allowances, past due according to these aging categories, greater than 90 days past due and still accruing interest and in nonaccrual status, by portfolio segment, were as follows at:

	Past Due				Greater than 90 Days Past Due Still Accruing Interest				Nonaccrual Status
	December 31, 2011		December 31, 2010		December 31, 2011		December 31, 2010		December 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(In millions)
Commercial	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1
Agricultural		—		7		—		—		—		6
Total	$	—	$	7	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	7

77

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Impaired Mortgage Loans.  The unpaid principal balance, recorded investment, valuation allowances and carrying value, net of valuation allowances, for impaired mortgage loans, including those modified in a troubled debt restructuring, by portfolio segment, were as follows at:

	Impaired Mortgage Loans
	Loans with a Valuation Allowance								Loans without a Valuation Allowance				All Impaired Loans
	Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Valuation Allowances		Carrying Value		Unpaid Principal Balance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Carrying Value
	(In millions)
December 31, 2011:
Commercial	$	23	$	23	$	15	$	8	$	15	$	15	$	38	$	23
Agricultural		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	23	$	23	$	15	$	8	$	15	$	15	$	38	$	23
December 31, 2010:
Commercial	$	23	$	23	$	23	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	23	$	—
Agricultural		—		—		—		—		7		7		7		7
Total	$	23	$	23	$	23	$	—	$	7	$	7	$	30	$	7

Unpaid principal balance is generally prior to any charge-offs.

The average investment in impaired mortgage loans, including those modified in a troubled debt restructuring, and the related interest income, by portfolio segment, for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and for all mortgage loans for the year ended December 31, 2009 was:

	Impaired Mortgage Loans
	Average Investment		Interest Income Recognized
			Cash Basis		Accrual Basis
			(In millions)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011:
Commercial	$	29	$	2	$	—
Agricultural		4		—		—
Total	$	33	$	2	$	—
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010:
Commercial	$	45	$	2	$	—
Agricultural		13		—		—
Total	$	58	$	2	$	—
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009	$	32	$	2	$	—

Mortgage Loans Modified in a Troubled Debt Restructuring.  See Note 1 for a discussion of loan modifications that are classified as troubled debt restructuring and the types of concessions typically granted. At December 31, 2011, the Company had one commercial mortgage loan modified during the period in a troubled debt restructuring with a pre-modification and post-modification carrying value of $15 million.

78

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

During the previous 12 months, the Company had no mortgage loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring with a subsequent payment default at December 31, 2011. Payment default is determined in the same manner as delinquency status — when interest and principal payments are past due as follows: commercial mortgage loans — 60 days or more; and agricultural mortgage loans — 90 days or more.

Real Estate and Real Estate Joint Ventures

Real estate investments by type consisted of the following:

	December 31,
	2011					2010
	Carrying Value		% of Total			Carrying Value		% of Total
	(In millions)					(In millions)
Traditional	$	208		41.4	%	$	105		21.0	%
Real estate joint ventures and funds		293		58.2			368		73.4
Real estate and real estate joint ventures		501		99.6			473		94.4
Foreclosed (commercial and agricultural)		2		0.4			28		5.6
Total real estate and real estate joint ventures	$	503		100.0	%	$	501		100.0	%

The Company classifies within traditional real estate its investment in income-producing real estate, which is comprised primarily of wholly-owned real estate and, to a lesser extent, joint ventures with interests in single property income-producing real estate. The Company classifies within real estate joint ventures and funds, its investments in joint ventures with interests in multi-property projects with varying strategies ranging from the development of properties to the operation of income-producing properties, as well as its investments in real estate private equity funds. From time to time, the Company transfers investments from these joint ventures to traditional real estate, if the Company retains an interest in the joint venture after a completed property commences operations and the Company intends to retain an interest in the property.

Properties acquired through foreclosure were $5 million and $28 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and include commercial and agricultural properties. There were no properties acquired through foreclosure for the year ended 2009. After the Company acquires properties through foreclosure, it evaluates whether the properties are appropriate for retention in its traditional real estate portfolio. Foreclosed real estate held at December 31, 2011 and 2010 includes those properties the Company has not selected for retention in its traditional real estate portfolio and which do not meet the criteria to be classified as held-for-sale.

The wholly-owned real estate within traditional real estate is net of accumulated depreciation of $27 million and $22 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Related depreciation expense on traditional wholly-owned real estate was $5 million, $4 million and $3 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Impairments recognized on real estate and real estate joint ventures were $1 million, $20 million and $61 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. There was no real estate held-for-sale at December 31, 2011 and 2010. The carrying value of non-income producing real estate was $4 million and $5 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Other Limited Partnership Interests

The carrying value of other limited partnership interests (which primarily represent ownership interests in pooled investment funds that principally make private equity investments in companies in the United States and

79

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

overseas) was $1.7 billion and $1.5 billion at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Included within other limited partnership interests were $409 million and $380 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, of investments in hedge funds. Impairments of other limited partnership interests, principally other limited partnership interests accounted for under the cost method, were $2 million, $11 million and $66 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Collectively Significant Equity Method Investments

The Company holds investments in real estate joint ventures, real estate funds and other limited partnership interests consisting of leveraged buy-out funds, hedge funds, private equity funds, joint ventures and other funds. The portion of these investments accounted for under the equity method had a carrying value of $2.0 billion as of December 31, 2011. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss related to these equity method investments is limited to the carrying value of these investments plus unfunded commitments of $1.0 billion as of December 31, 2011. Except for certain real estate joint ventures, the Company’s investments in real estate funds and other limited partnership interests are generally of a passive nature in that the Company does not participate in the management of the entities.

As further described in Note 1, the Company generally records its share of earnings in its equity method investments using a three-month lag methodology and within net investment income. As of December 31, 2011, aggregate net investment income from these equity method real estate joint ventures, real estate funds and other limited partnership interests exceeded 10% of the Company’s consolidated pre-tax income. Accordingly, the Company is providing the following aggregated summarized financial data for such equity method investments. This aggregated summarized financial data does not represent the Company’s proportionate share of the assets, liabilities, or earnings of such entities.

As of, and for the year ended December 31, 2011, the aggregated summarized financial data presented below reflects the latest available financial information. Aggregate total assets of these entities totaled $173.1 billion and $134.3 billion as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Aggregate total liabilities of these entities totaled $13.7 billion and $12.7 billion as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Aggregate net income (loss) of these entities totaled $7.1 billion, $14.0 billion and $13.4 billion for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Aggregate net income (loss) from real estate joint ventures, real estate funds and other limited partnership interests is primarily comprised of investment income, including recurring investment income and realized and unrealized investment gains (losses).

Other Invested Assets

The following table presents the carrying value of the Company’s other invested assets by type at:

	December 31,
	2011					2010
	Carrying Value		% of Total			Carrying Value		% of Total
	(In millions)					(In millions)
Freestanding derivatives with positive estimated fair values	$	2,766		82.5	%	$	1,520		89.0	%
Loans to affiliates		430		12.8			—		—
Leveraged leases, net of non-recourse debt		64		1.9			56		3.3
Tax credit partnerships		61		1.8			92		5.4
Joint venture investments		33		1.0			37		2.2
Other		—		—			2		0.1
Total	$	3,354		100.0	%	$	1,707		100.0	%

80

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

See Note 3 for information regarding the freestanding derivatives with positive estimated fair values. Loans to affiliates, some of which are regulated, are used by the affiliates to assist in meeting their capital requirements. See “— Related Party Investment Transactions” for information regarding loans to affiliates. See “— Leveraged Leases” for the composition of leveraged leases. Tax credit partnerships are established for the purpose of investing in low-income housing and other social causes, where the primary return on investment is in the form of income tax credits, and are accounted for under the equity method or under the effective yield method. Joint venture investments are accounted for under the equity method and represent the Company’s investment in insurance underwriting joint ventures in China.

Leveraged Leases

Investment in leveraged leases, included in other invested assets, consisted of the following:

	December 31,
	2011			2010
	(In millions)
Rental receivables, net	$	92		$	92
Estimated residual values		14			14
Subtotal		106			106
Unearned income		(42	)		(50	)
Investment in leveraged leases	$	64		$	56

Rental receivables are generally due in periodic installments. The remaining payment periods were 21 years. For rental receivables, the primary credit quality indicator is whether the rental receivable is performing or non-performing, which is assessed monthly. The Company generally defines non-performing rental receivables as those that are 90 days or more past due. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, all rental receivables were performing.

The deferred income tax liability related to leveraged leases was $35 million and $4 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The components of income from investment in leveraged leases, excluding realized gains (losses) were as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010		2009
	(In millions)
Net income from investment in leveraged leases	$	8		$	—	$	—
Less: Income tax expense on leveraged leases		(3	)		—		—
Net investment income after income tax from investment in leveraged leases	$	5		$	—	$	—

Cash Equivalents

The carrying value of cash equivalents, which includes securities and other investments with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase, was $583 million and $1.8 billion at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Purchased Credit Impaired Investments

Investments acquired with evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination and for which it is probable at the acquisition date that the Company will be unable to collect all contractually required payments

81

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

are classified as purchased credit impaired investments. For each investment, the excess of the cash flows expected to be collected as of the acquisition date over its acquisition-date fair value is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized as net investment income on an effective yield basis. If, subsequently, based on current information and events, it is probable that there is a significant increase in cash flows previously expected to be collected or if actual cash flows are significantly greater than cash flows previously expected to be collected, the accretable yield is adjusted prospectively. The excess of the contractually required payments (including interest) as of the acquisition date over the cash flows expected to be collected as of the acquisition date is referred to as the nonaccretable difference, and this amount is not expected to be realized as net investment income. Decreases in cash flows expected to be collected can result in OTTI.

The table below presents the purchased credit impaired fixed maturity securities held at:

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Outstanding principal and interest balance (1)	$	560	$	20
Carrying value (2)	$	418	$	19

(1) Represents the contractually required payments which is the sum of contractual principal, whether or not currently due, and accrued interest.

(2) Estimated fair value plus accrued interest.

The following table presents information about purchased credit impaired fixed maturity securities acquired during the periods, as of their respective acquisition dates:

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Contractually required payments (including interest)	$	882	$	24
Cash flows expected to be collected (1)	$	761	$	24
Fair value of investments acquired	$	449	$	19

(1) Represents undiscounted principal and interest cash flow expectations, at the date of acquisition.

The following table presents activity for the accretable yield on purchased credit impaired fixed maturity securities for:

	December 31,
	2011			2010
	(In millions)
Accretable yield, January 1,	$	5		$	—
Investments purchased		312			5
Accretion recognized in earnings		(9	)		—
Reclassification (to) from nonaccretable difference		12			—
Accretable yield, December 31,	$	320		$	5

Variable Interest Entities

The Company holds investments in certain entities that are VIEs. In certain instances, the Company holds both the power to direct the most significant activities of the entity, as well as an economic interest in the entity and, as such, is deemed to be the primary beneficiary or consolidator of the entity. The following table presents the

82

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

total assets and total liabilities relating to VIEs for which the Company has concluded that it is the primary beneficiary and which are consolidated at December 31, 2011 and 2010. Creditors or beneficial interest holders of VIEs where the Company is the primary beneficiary have no recourse to the general credit of the Company, as the Company’s obligation to the VIEs is limited to the amount of its committed investment.

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Consolidated securitization entities: (1)
Assets:
Mortgage loans held-for-investment (commercial mortgage loans)	$	3,138	$	6,840
Accrued investment income		14		31
Total assets	$	3,152	$	6,871
Liabilities:
Long-term debt	$	3,065	$	6,773
Other liabilities		14		31
Total liabilities	$	3,079	$	6,804

(1) The Company consolidates former QSPEs that are structured as CMBS. The assets of these entities can only be used to settle their respective liabilities, and under no circumstances is the Company liable for any principal or interest shortfalls should any arise. The Company’s exposure was limited to that of its remaining investment in the former QSPEs of $59 million and $64 million at estimated fair value at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The long-term debt presented above bears interest primarily at fixed rates ranging from 2.25% to 5.57%, payable primarily on a monthly basis and is expected to be repaid over the next six years. Interest expense related to these obligations, included in other expenses, was $322 million and $402 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company sold certain of these CMBS investments in the third quarter of 2011, resulting in the deconsolidation of such entities and their related mortgage loans held-for-investment and long-term debt.

The following table presents the carrying amount and maximum exposure to loss relating to VIEs for which the Company holds significant variable interests but is not the primary beneficiary and which have not been consolidated at:

	December 31,
	2011				2010
	Carrying Amount		Maximum Exposure to Loss (1)		Carrying Amount		Maximum Exposure to Loss (1)
	(In millions)
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale:
RMBS (2)	$	6,494	$	6,494	$	6,956	$	6,956
CMBS (2)		2,227		2,227		2,277		2,277
ABS (2)		1,878		1,878		1,622		1,622
U.S. corporate securities		424		424		336		336
Foreign corporate securities		234		234		348		348
Other limited partnership interests		1,302		1,982		1,192		1,992
Real estate joint ventures		22		26		10		35
Total	$	12,581	$	13,265	$	12,741	$	13,566

83

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

(1) The maximum exposure to loss relating to the fixed maturity securities is equal to the carrying amounts or carrying amounts of retained interests. The maximum exposure to loss relating to the other limited partnership interests and real estate joint ventures is equal to the carrying amounts plus any unfunded commitments of the Company. Such a maximum loss would be expected to occur only upon bankruptcy of the issuer or investee.

(2) For these variable interests, the Company’s involvement is limited to that of a passive investor.

As described in Note 11, the Company makes commitments to fund partnership investments in the normal course of business. Excluding these commitments, the Company did not provide financial or other support to investees designated as VIEs during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

Related Party Investment Transactions

In the normal course of business, the Company transfers invested assets, primarily consisting of fixed maturity securities, to and from affiliates. Invested assets transferred to and from affiliates were as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Estimated fair value of invested assets transferred to affiliates	$	—	$	582	$	717
Amortized cost of assets transferred to affiliates	$	—	$	533	$	769
Net investment gains (losses) recognized on transfers	$	—	$	49	$	(52	)
Estimated fair value of invested assets transferred from affiliates	$	33	$	46	$	143

During 2011 and 2009, the Company loaned $110 million and $200 million, respectively, to wholly-owned real estate subsidiaries of an affiliate, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, which are included in mortgage loans. The carrying value of these loans was $307 million and $199 million at December 31, 2011, and 2010, respectively. The 2011 loan of $110 million bears interest at one-month LIBOR + 1.95% with quarterly interest only payments of $1 million through January 2015, when the principal balance is due. Of the amount loaned in 2009, $140 million bears interest at 7.26% due in quarterly principal and interest payments of $3 million through January 2020, when the principal balance is due. The remaining $60 million bears interest at 7.01% with quarterly interest only payments of $1 million through January 2020, when the principal balance is due. The loans to affiliates are secured by interests in the real estate subsidiaries, which own operating real estate with a fair value in excess of the loans. Net investment income from these loans was $14 million for both years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, and less than $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.

During 2011, the Company issued loans totaling $430 million to Exeter Reassurance Company Ltd. (“Exeter”), an affiliate. These loans were outstanding at December 31, 2011, and are included in other invested assets. The loans of $305 million, issued by MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, and $125 million, issued by MLI-USA, are due on July 15, 2021 and December 16, 2021, respectively, and bear interest, payable semi-annually, at 5.64% and 5.86%, respectively. Both the principal and interest payments have been guaranteed by MetLife. Net investment income from these loans was $8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

The Company receives investment administrative services from an affiliate. These investment administrative service charges were $67 million, $56 million and $47 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company also had affiliated net investment income of less than $1 million, ($2) million and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

84

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

3. Derivative Financial Instruments

Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments

See Note 1 for a description of the Company’s accounting policies for derivative financial instruments.

See Note 4 for information about the fair value hierarchy for derivatives.

Primary Risks Managed by Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company is exposed to various risks relating to its ongoing business operations, including interest rate risk, foreign currency risk, credit risk and equity market risk. The Company uses a variety of strategies to manage these risks, including the use of derivative instruments. The following table presents the gross notional amount, estimated fair value and primary underlying risk exposure of the Company’s derivative financial instruments, excluding embedded derivatives, held at:

		December 31,
		2011						2010
Primary Underlying Risk Exposure	Instrument Type	Notional Amount		Estimated Fair Value (1)				Notional Amount		Estimated Fair Value (1)
				Assets		Liabilities				Assets		Liabilities
		(In millions)
Interest rate	Interest rate swaps	$	13,074	$	1,418	$	427	$	9,102	$	658	$	252
	Interest rate floors		7,986		330		152		7,986		127		62
	Interest rate caps		10,133		19		—		7,158		29		1
	Interest rate futures		3,766		10		1		1,966		5		7
	Interest rate forwards		620		128		—		695		—		71
Foreign currency	Foreign currency swaps		1,792		297		62		2,561		585		68
	Foreign currency forwards		149		9		—		151		4		1
Credit	Credit default swaps		2,426		18		28		1,324		15		22
Equity market	Equity futures		1,007		4		—		93		—		—
	Equity options		2,111		482		—		733		77		—
	Variance swaps		2,430		51		8		1,081		20		8
	Total rate of return swaps		129		—		2		—		—		—
	Total	$	45,623	$	2,766	$	680	$	32,850	$	1,520	$	492

(1) The estimated fair value of all derivatives in an asset position is reported within other invested assets in the consolidated balance sheets and the estimated fair value of all derivatives in a liability position is reported within other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

85

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The following table presents the gross notional amount of derivative financial instruments by maturity at December 31, 2011:

	Remaining Life
	One Year or Less		After One Year Through Five Years		After  Five Years Through Ten Years		After Ten Years		Total
	(In millions)
Interest rate swaps	$	901	$	3,589	$	2,976	$	5,608	$	13,074
Interest rate floors		—		6,936		1,050		—		7,986
Interest rate caps		1,750		7,880		503		—		10,133
Interest rate futures		3,766		—		—		—		3,766
Interest rate forwards		210		410		—		—		620
Foreign currency swaps		523		599		281		389		1,792
Foreign currency forwards		149		—		—		—		149
Credit default swaps		12		2,414		—		—		2,426
Equity futures		1,007		—		—		—		1,007
Equity options		75		1,011		1,025		—		2,111
Variance swaps		270		1,086		1,074		—		2,430
Total rate of return swaps		129		—		—		—		129
Total	$	8,792	$	23,925	$	6,909	$	5,997	$	45,623

Interest rate swaps are used by the Company primarily to reduce market risks from changes in interest rates and to alter interest rate exposure arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities (duration mismatches). In an interest rate swap, the Company agrees with another party to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed rate and floating rate interest amounts as calculated by reference to an agreed notional principal amount. These transactions are entered into pursuant to master agreements that provide for a single net payment to be made by the counterparty at each due date. The Company utilizes interest rate swaps in fair value, cash flow and non-qualifying hedging relationships.

The Company also enters into basis swaps to better match the cash flows from assets and related liabilities. In a basis swap, both legs of the swap are floating with each based on a different index. Generally, no cash is exchanged at the outset of the contract and no principal payments are made by either party. A single net payment is usually made by one counterparty at each due date. Basis swaps are included in interest rate swaps in the preceding table. The Company utilizes basis swaps in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Inflation swaps are used as an economic hedge to reduce inflation risk generated from inflation-indexed liabilities. Inflation swaps are included in interest rate swaps in the preceding table. The Company utilizes inflation swaps in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Implied volatility swaps are used by the Company primarily as economic hedges of interest rate risk associated with the Company’s investments in mortgage-backed securities. In an implied volatility swap, the Company exchanges fixed payments for floating payments that are linked to certain market volatility measures. If implied volatility rises, the floating payments that the Company receives will increase, and if implied volatility falls, the floating payments that the Company receives will decrease. Implied volatility swaps are included in interest rate swaps in the preceding table. The Company utilizes implied volatility swaps in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

86

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The Company purchases interest rate caps and floors primarily to protect its floating rate liabilities against rises in interest rates above a specified level, and against interest rate exposure arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities (duration mismatches), as well as to protect its minimum rate guarantee liabilities against declines in interest rates below a specified level, respectively. In certain instances, the Company locks in the economic impact of existing purchased caps and floors by entering into offsetting written caps and floors. The Company utilizes interest rate caps and floors in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

In exchange-traded interest rate (Treasury and swap) futures transactions, the Company agrees to purchase or sell a specified number of contracts, the value of which is determined by the different classes of interest rate securities, and to post variation margin on a daily basis in an amount equal to the difference in the daily market values of those contracts. The Company enters into exchange-traded futures with regulated futures commission merchants that are members of the exchange. Exchange-traded interest rate (Treasury and swap) futures are used primarily to hedge mismatches between the duration of assets in a portfolio and the duration of liabilities supported by those assets, to hedge against changes in value of securities the Company owns or anticipates acquiring and to hedge against changes in interest rates on anticipated liability issuances by replicating Treasury or swap curve performance. The Company utilizes exchange-traded interest rate futures in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

The Company writes covered call options on its portfolio of U.S. Treasury securities as an income generation strategy. In a covered call transaction, the Company receives a premium at the inception of the contract in exchange for giving the derivative counterparty the right to purchase the referenced security from the Company at a predetermined price. The call option is “covered” because the Company owns the referenced security over the term of the option. Covered call options are included in interest rate options. The Company utilizes covered call options in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

The Company enters into interest rate forwards to buy and sell securities. The price is agreed upon at the time of the contract and payment for such a contract is made at a specified future date. The Company utilizes interest rate forwards in cash flow and non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Foreign currency derivatives, including foreign currency swaps and foreign currency forwards, are used by the Company to reduce the risk from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates associated with its assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.

In a foreign currency swap transaction, the Company agrees with another party to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between one currency and another at a fixed exchange rate, generally set at inception, calculated by reference to an agreed upon principal amount. The principal amount of each currency is exchanged at the inception and termination of the currency swap by each party. The Company utilizes foreign currency swaps in fair value, cash flow, and non-qualifying hedging relationships.

In a foreign currency forward transaction, the Company agrees with another party to deliver a specified amount of an identified currency at a specified future date. The price is agreed upon at the time of the contract and payment for such a contract is made in a different currency at the specified future date. The Company utilizes foreign currency forwards in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Certain credit default swaps are used by the Company to hedge against credit-related changes in the value of its investments. In a credit default swap transaction, the Company agrees with another party, at specified intervals, to pay a premium to hedge credit risk. If a credit event, as defined by the contract, occurs, the contract may be cash settled or it may be settled gross by the delivery of par quantities of the referenced investment equal to the specified swap notional in exchange for the payment of cash amounts by the counterparty equal to the par value of the investment surrendered. The Company utilizes credit default swaps in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

87

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Credit default swaps are also used to synthetically create investments that are either more expensive to acquire or otherwise unavailable in the cash markets. These transactions are a combination of a derivative and one or more cash instruments such as U.S. Treasury securities, agency securities or other fixed maturity securities. These credit default swaps are not designated as hedging instruments.

The Company enters into forwards to lock in the price to be paid for forward purchases of certain securities. The price is agreed upon at the time of the contract and payment for the contract is made at a specified future date. When the primary purpose of entering into these transactions is to hedge against the risk of changes in purchase price due to changes in credit spreads, the Company designates these as credit forwards. The Company utilizes credit forwards in cash flow hedging relationships.

In exchange-traded equity futures transactions, the Company agrees to purchase or sell a specified number of contracts, the value of which is determined by the different classes of equity securities, and to post variation margin on a daily basis in an amount equal to the difference in the daily market values of those contracts. The Company enters into exchange-traded futures with regulated futures commission merchants that are members of the exchange. Exchange-traded equity futures are used primarily to hedge liabilities embedded in certain variable annuity products offered by the Company. The Company utilizes exchange-traded equity futures in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Equity index options are used by the Company primarily to hedge minimum guarantees embedded in certain variable annuity products offered by the Company. To hedge against adverse changes in equity indices, the Company enters into contracts to sell the equity index within a limited time at a contracted price. The contracts will be net settled in cash based on differentials in the indices at the time of exercise and the strike price. In certain instances, the Company may enter into a combination of transactions to hedge adverse changes in equity indices within a pre-determined range through the purchase and sale of options. Equity index options are included in equity options in the preceding table. The Company utilizes equity index options in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Equity variance swaps are used by the Company primarily to hedge minimum guarantees embedded in certain variable annuity products offered by the Company. In an equity variance swap, the Company agrees with another party to exchange amounts in the future, based on changes in equity volatility over a defined period. Equity variance swaps are included in variance swaps in the preceding table. The Company utilizes equity variance swaps in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

Total rate of return swaps (“TRRs”) are swaps whereby the Company agrees with another party to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between the economic risk and reward of an asset or a market index and the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), calculated by reference to an agreed notional principal amount. No cash is exchanged at the outset of the contract. Cash is paid and received over the life of the contract based on the terms of the swap. These transactions are entered into pursuant to master agreements that provide for a single net payment to be made by the counterparty at each due date. The Company uses TRRs to hedge its equity market guarantees in certain of its insurance products. TRRs can be used as hedges or to synthetically create investments. The Company utilizes TRRs in non-qualifying hedging relationships.

88

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Hedging

The following table presents the gross notional amount and estimated fair value of derivatives designated as hedging instruments by type of hedge designation at:

	December 31,
	2011						2010
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments	Notional Amount		Estimated Fair Value				Notional Amount		Estimated Fair Value
			Assets		Liabilities				Assets		Liabilities
	(In millions)
Fair value hedges:
Foreign currency swaps	$	598	$	188	$	19	$	787	$	334	$	18
Interest rate swaps		311		35		6		193		11		15
Subtotal		909		223		25		980		345		33
Cash flow hedges:
Foreign currency swaps		445		31		12		295		15		11
Interest rate swaps		355		96		—		575		1		45
Interest rate forwards		620		128		—		695		—		71
Subtotal		1,420		255		12		1,565		16		127
Total qualifying hedges	$	2,329	$	478	$	37	$	2,545	$	361	$	160

The following table presents the gross notional amount and estimated fair value of derivatives that were not designated or do not qualify as hedging instruments by derivative type at:

	December 31,
	2011						2010
Derivatives Not Designated or Not Qualifying as Hedging Instruments	Notional Amount		Estimated Fair Value				Notional Amount		Estimated Fair Value
			Assets		Liabilities				Assets		Liabilities
	(In millions)
Interest rate swaps	$	12,408	$	1,287	$	421	$	8,334	$	646	$	192
Interest rate floors		7,986		330		152		7,986		127		62
Interest rate caps		10,133		19		—		7,158		29		1
Interest rate futures		3,766		10		1		1,966		5		7
Foreign currency swaps		749		78		31		1,479		236		39
Foreign currency forwards		149		9		—		151		4		1
Credit default swaps		2,426		18		28		1,324		15		22
Equity futures		1,007		4		—		93		—		—
Equity options		2,111		482		—		733		77		—
Variance swaps		2,430		51		8		1,081		20		8
Total rate of return swaps		129		—		2		—		—		—
Total non-designated or non-qualifying derivatives	$	43,294	$	2,288	$	643	$	30,305	$	1,159	$	332

89

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Net Derivative Gains (Losses)

The components of net derivative gains (losses) were as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010			2009
	(In millions)
Derivatives and hedging gains (losses) (1)	$	846	$	(74	)	$	(717)
Embedded derivatives		273		132			(314)
Total net derivative gains (losses)	$	1,119	$	58		$	(1,031)

(1) Includes foreign currency transaction gains (losses) on hedged items in cash flow and non-qualifying hedging relationships, which are not presented elsewhere in this note.

The following table presents earned income on derivatives for the:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Qualifying hedges:
Net investment income	$	2	$	2	$	(1	)
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		41		37		40
Non-qualifying hedges:
Net derivative gains (losses)		83		6		(8	)
Total	$	126	$	45	$	31

Fair Value Hedges

The Company designates and accounts for the following as fair value hedges when they have met the requirements of fair value hedging: (i) interest rate swaps to convert fixed rate investments to floating rate investments; (ii) interest rate swaps to convert fixed rate liabilities to floating rate liabilities; and (iii) foreign currency swaps to hedge the foreign currency fair value exposure of foreign currency denominated liabilities.

90

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The Company recognizes gains and losses on derivatives and the related hedged items in fair value hedges within net derivative gains (losses). The following table represents the amount of such net derivative gains (losses):

Derivatives in Fair Value Hedging Relationships	Hedged Items in Fair Value Hedging Relationships	Net Derivative Gains (Losses) Recognized for Derivatives			Net Derivative Gains (Losses) Recognized for Hedged Items			Ineffectiveness Recognized in Net Derivative Gains (Losses)
		(In millions)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011:
Interest rate swaps:	Fixed maturity securities	$	(7	)	$	5		$	(2	)
	PABs (1)		36			(38	)		(2	)
Foreign currency swaps:	Foreign-denominated PABs (2)		(52	)		30			(22	)
Total		$	(23	)	$	(3	)	$	(26	)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010:
Interest rate swaps:	Fixed maturity securities	$	(1	)	$	1		$	—
	PABs (1)		(13	)		8			(5	)
Foreign currency swaps:	Foreign-denominated PABs (2)		(38	)		14			(24	)
Total		$	(52	)	$	23		$	(29	)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009:
Interest rate swaps:	Fixed maturity securities	$	6		$	(6	)	$	—
	PABs (1)		(8	)		4			(4	)
Foreign currency swaps:	Foreign-denominated PABs (2)		111			(117	)		(6	)
Total		$	109		$	(119	)	$	(10	)

(1) Fixed rate liabilities.

(2) Fixed rate or floating rate liabilities.

All components of each derivative’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company designates and accounts for the following as cash flow hedges when they have met the requirements of cash flow hedging: (i) foreign currency swaps to hedge the foreign currency cash flow exposure of foreign currency denominated investments and liabilities; (ii) interest rate forwards and credit forwards to lock in the price to be paid for forward purchases of investments; (iii) interest rate swaps and interest rate forwards to hedge the forecasted purchases of fixed-rate investments; and (iv) interest rate swaps to convert floating rate investments to fixed rate investments.

In certain instances, the Company discontinued cash flow hedge accounting because the forecasted transactions did not occur on the anticipated date, within two months of that date, or were no longer probable of occurring. The net amount reclassified into net derivative gains (losses) for the year ended December 31, 2011 related to such discontinued cash flow hedges was $1 million. The net amount reclassified into net derivative gains (losses) for the year ended December 31, 2010 related to such discontinued cash flow hedges was insignificant. There were no amounts reclassified into net derivative gains (losses) for the year ended December 31, 2009 related to such discontinued cash flow hedges.

91

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the maximum length of time over which the Company was hedging its exposure to variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions did not exceed five years and six years, respectively.

The following table presents the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), before income tax, related to cash flow hedges:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), balance at January 1,	$	(109)	$	(1)	$	20
Gains (losses) deferred in other comprehensive income (loss) on the effective portion of cash flow hedges		357		(107)		(44)
Amounts reclassified to net derivative gains (losses)		(9)		(1)		23
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), balance at December 31,	$	239	$	(109)	$	(1)

At December 31, 2011, insignificant amounts of deferred net gains (losses) on derivatives in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were expected to be reclassified to earnings within the next 12 months.

The following table presents the effects of derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships on the consolidated statements of operations and the consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity:

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Amount of Gains (Losses) Deferred in Accumulated Other Comprehensive  Income (Loss) on Derivatives			Amount and Location of Gains (Losses) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) into Income (Loss)			Amount and Location of Gains (Losses) Recognized in Income (Loss) on Derivatives
	(Effective Portion)			(Effective Portion)			(Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
				Net Derivative Gains (Losses)			Net Derivative Gains (Losses)
	(In millions)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011:
Interest rate swaps	$	132		$	1		$	—
Foreign currency swaps		17			(2	)		—
Interest rate forwards		208			9			1
Credit forwards		—			1			—
Total	$	357		$	9		$	1
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010:
Interest rate swaps	$	(44	)	$	—		$	—
Foreign currency swaps		(6	)		(3	)		—
Interest rate forwards		(71	)		4			(1	)
Credit forwards		14			—			—
Total	$	(107)		$	1		$	(1)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009:
Interest rate swaps	$	—		$	—		$	—
Foreign currency swaps		(58	)		(36	)		—
Interest rate forwards		17			13			—
Credit forwards		(3	)		—			—
Total	$	(44)		$	(23)		$	—

92

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

All components of each derivative’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

Non-Qualifying Derivatives and Derivatives for Purposes Other Than Hedging

The Company enters into the following derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting or for purposes other than hedging: (i) interest rate swaps, implied volatility swaps, caps and floors and interest rate futures to economically hedge its exposure to interest rates; (ii) foreign currency forwards and swaps to economically hedge its exposure to adverse movements in exchange rates; (iii) credit default swaps to economically hedge exposure to adverse movements in credit; (iv) equity futures, equity index options, interest rate futures, TRRs and equity variance swaps to economically hedge liabilities embedded in certain variable annuity products; (v) credit default swaps to synthetically create investments; (vi) interest rate forwards to buy and sell securities to economically hedge its exposure to interest rates; (vii) basis swaps to better match the cash flows of assets and related liabilities; (viii) inflation swaps to reduce risk generated from inflation-indexed liabilities; (ix) covered call options for income generation; and (x) equity options to economically hedge certain invested assets against adverse changes in equity indices.

93

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The following table presents the amount and location of gains (losses) recognized in income for derivatives that were not designated or qualifying as hedging instruments:

	Net Derivative Gains  (Losses)		Net Investment Income  (1)		Policyholder Benefits and Claims (2)
	(In millions)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011:
Interest rate swaps	$	511	$	—	$	—
Interest rate floors		114		—		—
Interest rate caps		(41)		—		—
Interest rate futures		118		—		—
Equity futures		(70)		—		(4)
Foreign currency swaps		27		—		—
Foreign currency forwards		—		—		—
Equity options		82		(7)		—
Interest rate options		—		—		—
Interest rate forwards		(1)		—		—
Variance swaps		33		—		—
Credit default swaps		—		—		—
Total	$	773	$	(7)	$	(4)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010:
Interest rate swaps	$	51	$	—	$	—
Interest rate floors		20		—		—
Interest rate caps		(9)		—		—
Interest rate futures		(22)		—		—
Equity futures		(12)		—		—
Foreign currency swaps		(31)		—		—
Foreign currency forwards		2		—		—
Equity options		(30)		(7)		—
Interest rate options		(3)		—		—
Interest rate forwards		1		—		—
Variance swaps		(6)		—		—
Credit default swaps		—		—		—
Total	$	(39)	$	(7)	$	—
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009:
Interest rate swaps	$	(149)	$	—	$	—
Interest rate floors		(265)		—		—
Interest rate caps		4		—		—
Interest rate futures		(37)		—		—
Equity futures		(71)		—		—
Foreign currency swaps		(3)		—		—
Foreign currency forwards		(4)		—		—
Equity options		(121)		(1)		—
Interest rate options		—		—		—
Interest rate forwards		—		—		—
Variance swaps		(40)		—		—
Credit default swaps		(50)		—		—
Total	$	(736)	$	(1)	$	—

94

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

(1) Changes in estimated fair value related to economic hedges of equity method investments in joint ventures.

(2) Changes in estimated fair value related to economic hedges of variable annuity guarantees included in future policy benefits.

Credit Derivatives

In connection with synthetically created investment transactions, the Company writes credit default swaps for which it receives a premium to insure credit risk. Such credit derivatives are included within the non-qualifying derivatives and derivatives for purposes other than hedging table. If a credit event occurs, as defined by the contract, the contract may be cash settled or it may be settled gross by the Company paying the counterparty the specified swap notional amount in exchange for the delivery of par quantities of the referenced credit obligation. The Company’s maximum amount at risk, assuming the value of all referenced credit obligations is zero, was $2.1 billion and $912 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company can terminate these contracts at any time through cash settlement with the counterparty at an amount equal to the then current fair value of the credit default swaps. At December 31, 2011, the Company would have paid $11 million to terminate all of these contracts, and at December 31, 2010, the Company would have received $13 million to terminate all of these contracts.

The following table presents the estimated fair value, maximum amount of future payments and weighted average years to maturity of written credit default swaps at:

	December 31,
	2011						2010
Rating Agency Designation of Referenced Credit Obligations (1)	Estimated Fair Value of Credit Default Swaps		Maximum Amount of Future Payments under Credit Default Swaps (2)		Weighted Average Years to Maturity (3)		Estimated Fair Value of Credit Default Swaps		Maximum Amount of Future Payments under Credit Default Swaps (2)		Weighted Average Years to Maturity (3)
	(In millions)				(In millions)
Aaa/Aa/A
Single name credit default swaps (corporate)	$	2	$	212		4.3	$	1	$	45		3.6
Credit default swaps referencing indices		—		661		3.1		11		679		3.7
Subtotal		2		873		3.4		12		724		3.7
Baa
Single name credit default swaps (corporate)		(6)		434		4.6		—		5		3.0
Credit default swaps referencing indices		(7)		793		4.8		1		183		5.0
Subtotal		(13)		1,227		4.7		1		188		5.0
Total	$	(11)	$	2,100		4.2	$	13	$	912		4.0

(1) The rating agency designations are based on availability and the midpoint of the applicable ratings among Moody’s Investors Service, S&P and Fitch Ratings. If no rating is available from a rating agency, then an internally developed rating is used.

(2) Assumes the value of the referenced credit obligations is zero.

(3) The weighted average years to maturity of the credit default swaps is calculated based on weighted average notional amounts.

95

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Credit Risk on Freestanding Derivatives

The Company may be exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivative financial instruments. Generally, the current credit exposure of the Company’s derivative contracts is limited to the net positive estimated fair value of derivative contracts at the reporting date after taking into consideration the existence of netting agreements and any collateral received pursuant to credit support annexes.

The Company manages its credit risk related to OTC derivatives by entering into transactions with creditworthy counterparties, maintaining collateral arrangements and through the use of master agreements that provide for a single net payment to be made by one counterparty to another at each due date and upon termination. Because exchange-traded futures are effected through regulated exchanges, and positions are marked to market on a daily basis, the Company has minimal exposure to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to such derivative instruments. See Note 4 for a description of the impact of credit risk on the valuation of derivative instruments.

The Company enters into various collateral arrangements, which require both the pledging and accepting of collateral in connection with its OTC derivative instruments. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company was obligated to return cash collateral under its control of $1.6 billion and $965 million, respectively. This cash collateral is included in cash and cash equivalents or in short-term investments and the obligation to return it is included in payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions in the consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had received collateral consisting of various securities with a fair market value of $315 million and $3 million, respectively, which were held in separate custodial accounts. Subject to certain constraints, the Company is permitted by contract to sell or repledge this collateral, but at December 31, 2011, none of the collateral had been sold or repledged.

The Company’s collateral arrangements for its OTC derivatives generally require the counterparty in a net liability position, after considering the effect of netting agreements, to pledge collateral when the fair value of that counterparty’s derivatives reaches a pre-determined threshold. Certain of these arrangements also include credit-contingent provisions that provide for a reduction of these thresholds (on a sliding scale that converges toward zero) in the event of downgrades in the credit ratings of the Company and/or the counterparty. In addition, certain of the Company’s netting agreements for derivative instruments contain provisions that require the Company to maintain a specific investment grade credit rating from at least one of the major credit rating agencies. If the Company’s credit ratings were to fall below that specific investment grade credit rating, it would be in violation of these provisions, and the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request immediate payment or demand immediate and ongoing full overnight collateralization on derivative instruments that are in a net liability position after considering the effect of netting agreements.

96

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The following table presents the estimated fair value of the Company’s OTC derivatives that are in a net liability position after considering the effect of netting agreements, together with the estimated fair value and balance sheet location of the collateral pledged. The table also presents the incremental collateral that the Company would be required to provide if there was a one notch downgrade in the Company’s credit rating at the reporting date or if the Company’s credit rating sustained a downgrade to a level that triggered full overnight collateralization or termination of the derivative position at the reporting date. Derivatives that are not subject to collateral agreements are not included in the scope of this table.

		Estimated Fair Value of Collateral Provided: (2)	Fair Value of Incremental Collateral Provided Upon:
	Estimated Fair Value (1) of Derivatives in Net Liability Position	Fixed Maturity Securities	One Notch Downgrade in the Company’s Credit Rating	Downgrade in the Company’s Credit Rating to a Level that Triggers Full Overnight Collateralization or Termination of the Derivative Position
	(In millions)
December 31, 2011	$                  14	$                    9	$            1	$                             10
December 31, 2010	$                  96	$                  58	$          11	$                             62

(1) After taking into consideration the existence of netting agreements.

(2) Included in fixed maturity securities in the consolidated balance sheets. Subject to certain constraints, the counterparties are permitted by contract to sell or repledge this collateral. At both December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not provide any cash collateral.

Without considering the effect of netting agreements, the estimated fair value of the Company’s OTC derivatives with credit-contingent provisions that were in a gross liability position at December 31, 2011 was $143 million. At December 31, 2011, the Company provided securities collateral of $9 million in connection with these derivatives. In the unlikely event that both: (i) the Company’s credit rating was downgraded to a level that triggers full overnight collateralization or termination of all derivative positions; and (ii) the Company’s netting agreements were deemed to be legally unenforceable, then the additional collateral that the Company would be required to provide to its counterparties in connection with its derivatives in a gross liability position at December 31, 2011 would be $134 million. This amount does not consider gross derivative assets of $129 million for which the Company has the contractual right of offset.

The Company also has exchange-traded futures, which may require the pledging of collateral. At both December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not pledge any securities collateral for exchange-traded futures. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company provided cash collateral for exchange-traded futures of $140 million and $25 million, respectively, which is included in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables.

Embedded Derivatives

The Company issues certain products or purchases certain investments that contain embedded derivatives that are required to be separated from their host contracts and accounted for as freestanding derivatives. These host contracts principally include: variable annuities with guaranteed minimum benefits, including GMWBs, GMABs and certain GMIBs; affiliated ceded reinsurance of guaranteed minimum benefits related to GMWBs, GMABs and certain GMIBs; affiliated assumed reinsurance of guaranteed minimum benefits related to GMWBs and certain GMIBs; ceded reinsurance written on a funds withheld basis; and options embedded in debt or equity securities.

97

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The following table presents the estimated fair value of the Company’s embedded derivatives at:

	December 31,
	2011			2010
	(In millions)
Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts:
Ceded guaranteed minimum benefits	$	2,815		$	936
Options embedded in debt or equity securities		(2	)		(2	)
Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts	$	2,813		$	934
Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts:
Direct guaranteed minimum benefits	$	1,363		$	254
Assumed guaranteed minimum benefits		4			—
Funds withheld on ceded reinsurance		416			5
Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts	$	1,783		$	259

The following table presents changes in estimated fair value related to embedded derivatives:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Net derivative gains (losses) (1), (2)	$	273	$	132	$	(314	)

(1) The valuation of direct and assumed guaranteed minimum benefits includes an adjustment for nonperformance risk. The amounts included in net derivative gains (losses), in connection with this adjustment, were $354 million, ($153) million and ($567) million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In addition, the valuation of ceded guaranteed minimum benefits includes an adjustment for nonperformance risk. The amounts included in net derivative gains (losses), in connection with this adjustment, were ($476) million, $210 million and $816 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(2) See Note 8 for discussion of affiliated net derivative gains (losses) included in the table above.

4. Fair Value

Considerable judgment is often required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value, and the use of different assumptions or valuation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

98

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis, including those items for which the Company has elected the FVO, were determined as described below. These estimated fair values and their corresponding placement in the fair value hierarchy are summarized as follows:

	December 31, 2011
	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Estimated Fair Value
	(In millions)
Assets:
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. corporate securities	$	—	$	15,907	$	1,432	$	17,339
Foreign corporate securities		—		7,913		580		8,493
U.S. Treasury and agency securities		4,326		3,722		—		8,048
RMBS		—		6,255		239		6,494
CMBS		—		2,080		147		2,227
State and political subdivision securities		—		2,032		23		2,055
ABS		—		1,658		220		1,878
Foreign government securities		—		1,245		2		1,247
Total fixed maturity securities		4,326		40,812		2,643		47,781
Equity securities:
Common stock		51		74		21		146
Non-redeemable preferred stock		—		30		76		106
Total equity securities		51		104		97		252
Other securities:
FVO general account securities		—		49		—		49
FVO contractholder-directed unit-linked investments		3,616		—		—		3,616
Total other securities		3,616		49		—		3,665
Short-term investments (1)		865		1,684		10		2,559
Mortgage loans held by CSEs		—		3,138		—		3,138
Derivative assets: (2)
Interest rate contracts		10		1,708		187		1,905
Foreign currency contracts		—		306		—		306
Credit contracts		—		12		6		18
Equity market contracts		4		482		51		537
Total derivative assets		14		2,508		244		2,766
Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts (3)		—		—		2,815		2,815
Separate account assets (4)		185		72,244		130		72,559
Total assets	$	9,057	$	120,539	$	5,939	$	135,535
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities: (2)
Interest rate contracts	$	1	$	566	$	13	$	580
Foreign currency contracts		—		62		—		62
Credit contracts		—		21		7		28
Equity market contracts		—		2		8		10
Total derivative liabilities		1		651		28		680
Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts (3)		—		—		1,783		1,783
Long-term debt of CSEs		—		3,065		—		3,065
Total liabilities	$	1	$	3,716	$	1,811	$	5,528

99

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

	December 31, 2010
	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets and Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Estimated Fair Value
	(In millions)
Assets:
Fixed maturity securities:
U.S. corporate securities	$	—	$	13,864	$	1,510	$	15,374
Foreign corporate securities		—		7,590		880		8,470
U.S. Treasury and agency securities		4,616		3,026		34		7,676
RMBS		—		6,674		282		6,956
CMBS		—		2,147		130		2,277
State and political subdivision securities		—		1,614		32		1,646
ABS		—		1,301		321		1,622
Foreign government securities		—		889		14		903
Total fixed maturity securities		4,616		37,105		3,203		44,924
Equity securities:
Common stock		43		72		22		137
Non-redeemable preferred stock		—		54		214		268
Total equity securities		43		126		236		405
Other securities:
FVO general account securities		—		7		—		7
FVO contractholder-directed unit-linked investments		2,240		—		—		2,240
Total other securities		2,240		7		—		2,247
Short-term investments (1)		390		584		173		1,147
Mortgage loans held by CSEs		—		6,840		—		6,840
Derivative assets: (2)
Interest rate contracts		5		804		10		819
Foreign currency contracts		—		589		—		589
Credit contracts		—		3		12		15
Equity market contracts		—		77		20		97
Total derivative assets		5		1,473		42		1,520
Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts (3)		—		—		936		936
Separate account assets (4)		76		61,410		133		61,619
Total assets	$	7,370	$	107,545	$	4,723	$	119,638
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities: (2)
Interest rate contracts	$	7	$	315	$	71	$	393
Foreign currency contracts		—		69		—		69
Credit contracts		—		21		1		22
Equity market contracts		—		—		8		8
Total derivative liabilities		7		405		80		492
Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts (3)		—		—		259		259
Long-term debt of CSEs		—		6,773		—		6,773
Total liabilities	$	7	$	7,178	$	339	$	7,524

(1) Short-term investments as presented in the tables above differ from the amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheets because certain short-term investments are not measured at estimated fair value (e.g., time deposits, etc.), and therefore are excluded from the tables presented above.

100

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

(2) Derivative assets are presented within other invested assets in the consolidated balance sheets and derivative liabilities are presented within other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The amounts are presented gross in the tables above to reflect the presentation in the consolidated balance sheets, but are presented net for purposes of the rollforward in the Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) tables which follow.

(3) Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts are presented within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables in the consolidated balance sheets. Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts are presented primarily within PABs and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2011, fixed maturity securities and equity securities also included embedded derivatives of $1 million and ($3) million, respectively. At December 31, 2010, fixed maturity securities and equity securities included embedded derivatives of $3 million and ($5) million, respectively.

(4) Separate account assets are measured at estimated fair value. Investment performance related to separate account assets is fully offset by corresponding amounts credited to contractholders whose liability is reflected within separate account liabilities. Separate account liabilities are set equal to the estimated fair value of separate account assets.

See Note 2 for discussion of CSEs included in the tables above and for certain prior year amounts which have been reclassified to conform with the 2011 presentation.

The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments are summarized as follows:

Fixed Maturity Securities, Equity Securities, Other Securities and Short-term Investments

When available, the estimated fair value of the Company’s fixed maturity securities, equity securities, other securities and short-term investments are based on quoted prices in active markets that are readily and regularly obtainable. Generally, these are the most liquid of the Company’s securities holdings and valuation of these securities does not involve management’s judgment.

When quoted prices in active markets are not available, the determination of estimated fair value is based on market standard valuation methodologies, giving priority to observable inputs. The market standard valuation methodologies utilized include: discounted cash flow methodologies, matrix pricing or other similar techniques. The inputs in applying these market standard valuation methodologies include, but are not limited to: interest rates, credit standing of the issuer or counterparty, industry sector of the issuer, coupon rate, call provisions, sinking fund requirements, maturity and management’s assumptions regarding estimated duration, liquidity and estimated future cash flows. Accordingly, the estimated fair values are based on available market information and management’s judgments about financial instruments.

The significant inputs to the market standard valuation methodologies for certain types of securities with reasonable levels of price transparency are inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. Such observable inputs include benchmarking prices for similar assets in active markets, quoted prices in markets that are not active and observable yields and spreads in the market.

When observable inputs are not available, the market standard valuation methodologies for determining the estimated fair value of certain types of securities that trade infrequently, and therefore have little or no price transparency, rely on inputs that are significant to the estimated fair value that are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. These unobservable inputs can be

101

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

based in large part on management’s judgment or estimation and cannot be supported by reference to market activity. Even though these inputs are unobservable, management believes they are consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing such securities and are considered appropriate given the circumstances.

The use of different methodologies, assumptions and inputs may have a material effect on the estimated fair values of the Company’s securities holdings.

Mortgage Loans Held by CSEs

The Company consolidates certain securitization entities that hold commercial mortgage loans. These commercial mortgage loans held by CSEs, for which the Company has elected the FVO, are presented within mortgage loans in the consolidated balance sheets. See “— Valuation Techniques and Inputs by Level Within the Three-Level Fair Value Hierarchy by Major Classes of Assets and Liabilities” below for a discussion of the methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these financial instruments.

Derivatives

The estimated fair value of derivatives is determined through the use of quoted market prices for exchange-traded derivatives or through the use of pricing models for OTC derivatives. The determination of estimated fair value, when quoted market values are not available, is based on market standard valuation methodologies and inputs that management believes are consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing the instruments. Derivative valuations can be affected by changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, financial indices, credit spreads, default risk, nonperformance risk, volatility, liquidity and changes in estimates and assumptions used in the pricing models.

The significant inputs to the pricing models for most OTC derivatives are inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. Significant inputs that are observable generally include: interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, interest rate curves, credit curves and volatility. However, certain OTC derivatives may rely on inputs that are significant to the estimated fair value that are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. Significant inputs that are unobservable generally include: independent broker quotes, references to emerging market currencies and inputs that are outside the observable portion of the interest rate curve, credit curve, volatility or other relevant market measure. These unobservable inputs may involve significant management judgment or estimation. Even though unobservable, these inputs are based on assumptions deemed appropriate given the circumstances and management believes they are consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing such instruments.

The credit risk of both the counterparty and the Company are considered in determining the estimated fair value for all OTC derivatives, and any potential credit adjustment is based on the net exposure by counterparty after taking into account the effects of netting agreements and collateral arrangements. The Company values its derivative positions using the standard swap curve which includes a spread to the risk free rate. This credit spread is appropriate for those parties that execute trades at pricing levels consistent with the standard swap curve. As the Company and its significant derivative counterparties consistently execute trades at such pricing levels, additional credit risk adjustments are not currently required in the valuation process. The Company’s ability to consistently execute at such pricing levels is in part due to the netting agreements and collateral arrangements that are in place with all of its significant derivative counterparties. The evaluation of the requirement to make additional credit risk adjustments is performed by the Company each reporting period.

102

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Most inputs for OTC derivatives are mid market inputs but, in certain cases, bid level inputs are used when they are deemed more representative of exit value. Market liquidity, as well as the use of different methodologies, assumptions and inputs, may have a material effect on the estimated fair values of the Company’s derivatives and could materially affect net income.

Embedded Derivatives Within Asset and Liability Host Contracts

Embedded derivatives principally include certain direct, assumed and ceded variable annuity guarantees and embedded derivatives related to funds withheld on ceded reinsurance. Embedded derivatives are recorded at estimated fair value with changes in estimated fair value reported in net income.

The Company issues certain variable annuity products with guaranteed minimum benefits. GMWBs, GMABs and certain GMIBs are embedded derivatives, which are measured at estimated fair value separately from the host variable annuity contract, with changes in estimated fair value reported in net derivative gains (losses). These embedded derivatives are classified within PABs in the consolidated balance sheets.

The fair value of these guarantees is estimated using the present value of projected future benefits minus the present value of projected future fees using actuarial and capital market assumptions including expectations concerning policyholder behavior. A risk neutral valuation methodology is used under which the cash flows from the guarantees are projected under multiple capital market scenarios using observable risk free rates. The valuation of these guarantee liabilities includes adjustments for nonperformance risk and for a risk margin related to non-capital market inputs.

The nonperformance adjustment is determined by taking into consideration publicly available information relating to spreads in the secondary market for MetLife’s debt, including related credit default swaps. These observable spreads are then adjusted, as necessary, to reflect the priority of these liabilities and the claims paying ability of the issuing insurance subsidiaries compared to MetLife.

Risk margins are established to capture the non-capital market risks of the instrument which represent the additional compensation a market participant would require to assume the risks related to the uncertainties of such actuarial assumptions as annuitization, premium persistency, partial withdrawal and surrenders. The establishment of risk margins requires the use of significant management judgment, including assumptions of the amount and cost of capital needed to cover the guarantees. These guarantees may be more costly than expected in volatile or declining equity markets. Market conditions including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates, equity indices, market volatility and foreign currency exchange rates; changes in nonperformance risk; and variations in actuarial assumptions regarding policyholder behavior, mortality and risk margins related to non-capital market inputs may result in significant fluctuations in the estimated fair value of the guarantees that could materially affect net income.

The Company assumed, from an affiliated insurance company, the risk associated with certain GMIBs and GMWBs. These embedded derivatives are included in other policy-related balances in the consolidated balance sheets with changes in estimated fair value reported in net derivative gains (losses). The value of the embedded derivatives on these assumed risks is determined using a methodology consistent with that described previously for the guarantees directly written by the Company.

The Company ceded, to an affiliated reinsurance company, the risk associated with certain of the GMIBs, GMABs and GMWBs described above that are also accounted for as embedded derivatives. In addition to ceding risks associated with guarantees that are accounted for as embedded derivatives, the Company also cedes, to the same affiliated reinsurance company, certain directly written GMIBs that are accounted for as insurance (i.e., not as embedded derivatives), but where the reinsurance agreement contains an embedded derivative. These

103

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

embedded derivatives are included within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables in the consolidated balance sheets with changes in estimated fair value reported in net derivative gains (losses). The value of the embedded derivatives on these ceded risks is determined using a methodology consistent with that described previously for the guarantees directly written by the Company with the exception of the input for nonperformance risk that reflects the credit of the reinsurer.

The estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives within funds withheld related to certain ceded reinsurance is determined based on the change in estimated fair value of the underlying assets held by the Company in a reference portfolio backing the funds withheld liability. The estimated fair value of the underlying assets is determined as previously described in “— Fixed Maturity Securities, Equity Securities, Other Securities and Short-term Investments.” The estimated fair value of these embedded derivatives is included, along with their funds withheld hosts, in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets with changes in estimated fair value recorded in net derivative gains (losses). Changes in the credit spreads on the underlying assets, interest rates and market volatility may result in significant fluctuations in the estimated fair value of these embedded derivatives that could materially affect net income.

Separate Account Assets

Separate account assets are carried at estimated fair value and reported as a summarized total on the consolidated balance sheets. The estimated fair value of separate account assets is based on the estimated fair value of the underlying assets. Assets within the Company’s separate accounts include: mutual funds, fixed maturity securities, equity securities, derivatives, other limited partnership interests, short-term investments and cash and cash equivalents. See “— Valuation Techniques and Inputs by Level Within the Three-Level Fair Value Hierarchy by Major Classes of Assets and Liabilities” below for a discussion of the methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these financial instruments.

Long-term Debt of CSEs

The Company has elected the FVO for the long-term debt of CSEs. See “— Valuation Techniques and Inputs by Level Within the Three-Level Fair Value Hierarchy by Major Classes of Assets and Liabilities” below for a discussion of the methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these financial instruments.

Valuation Techniques and Inputs by Level Within the Three-Level Fair Value Hierarchy by Major Classes of Assets and Liabilities

A description of the significant valuation techniques and inputs to the determination of estimated fair value for the more significant asset and liability classes measured at fair value on a recurring basis is as follows:

The Company determines the estimated fair value of its investments using primarily the market approach and the income approach. The use of quoted prices for identical assets and matrix pricing or other similar techniques are examples of market approaches, while the use of discounted cash flow methodologies is an example of the income approach. The Company attempts to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in selecting whether the market or income approach is used.

While certain investments have been classified as Level 1 from the use of unadjusted quoted prices for identical investments supported by high volumes of trading activity and narrow bid/ask spreads, most investments have been classified as Level 2 because the significant inputs used to measure the fair value on a recurring basis of the same or similar investment are market observable or can be corroborated using market observable information for the full term of the investment. Level 3 investments include those where estimated fair values are based on significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and may reflect management’s own assumptions about what factors market participants would use in pricing these investments.

104

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Level 1 Measurements:

Fixed Maturity Securities, Equity Securities, Other Securities and Short-term Investments

These securities are comprised of U.S. Treasury securities, exchange traded common stock, exchange traded registered mutual fund interests included in other securities and short-term money market securities, including U.S. Treasury bills. Valuation of these securities is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are readily and regularly available. Contractholder- directed unit- linked investments reported within other securities include certain registered mutual fund interests priced using daily NAV provided by the fund managers.

Derivative Assets and Derivative Liabilities

These assets and liabilities are comprised of exchange-traded derivatives. Valuation of these assets and liabilities is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are readily and regularly available.

Separate Account Assets

These assets are comprised of (i) securities that are similar in nature to the fixed maturity securities, equity securities and short-term investments referred to above; and (ii) certain exchange-traded derivatives, including financial futures. Valuation of these assets is based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are readily and regularly available.

Level 2 Measurements:

Fixed Maturity Securities, Equity Securities, Other Securities and Short-term Investments

This level includes fixed maturity securities and equity securities priced principally by independent pricing services using observable inputs. Other securities and short-term investments within this level are of a similar nature and class to the Level 2 securities described below.

U.S. corporate and foreign corporate securities.  These securities are principally valued using the market and income approaches. Valuation is based primarily on quoted prices in markets that are not active, or using matrix pricing or other similar techniques that use standard market observable inputs such as benchmark yields, spreads off benchmark yields, new issuances, issuer rating, duration, and trades of identical or comparable securities. Investment grade privately placed securities are valued using discounted cash flow methodologies using standard market observable inputs, and inputs derived from, or corroborated by, market observable data including market yield curve, duration, call provisions, observable prices and spreads for similar publicly traded or privately traded issues that incorporate the credit quality and industry sector of the issuer. This level also includes certain below investment grade privately placed fixed maturity securities priced by independent pricing services that use observable inputs.

Structured securities comprised of RMBS, CMBS and ABS.  These securities are principally valued using the market approach. Valuation is based primarily on matrix pricing or other similar techniques using standard market inputs including spreads for actively traded securities, spreads off benchmark yields, expected prepayment speeds and volumes, current and forecasted loss severity, rating, weighted average coupon, weighted average maturity, average delinquency rates, geographic region, debt-service coverage ratios and issuance-specific information including, but not limited to: collateral type, payment terms of the underlying assets, payment priority within the tranche, structure of the security, deal performance and vintage of loans.

U.S. Treasury and agency securities.  These securities are principally valued using the market approach. Valuation is based primarily on quoted prices in markets that are not active, or using matrix pricing or other

105

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

similar techniques using standard market observable inputs such as benchmark U.S. Treasury yield curve, the spread off the U.S. Treasury curve for the identical security and comparable securities that are actively traded.

Foreign government and state and political subdivision securities.  These securities are principally valued using the market approach. Valuation is based primarily on matrix pricing or other similar techniques using standard market observable inputs including benchmark U.S. Treasury or other yields, issuer ratings, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads and reported trades of similar securities, including those within the same sub-sector or with a similar maturity or credit rating.

Common and non-redeemable preferred stock.  These securities are principally valued using the market approach where market quotes are available but are not considered actively traded. Valuation is based principally on observable inputs including quoted prices in markets that are not considered active.

Mortgage Loans Held by CSEs

These commercial mortgage loans are principally valued using the market approach. The principal market for these commercial loan portfolios is the securitization market. The Company uses the quoted securitization market price of the obligations of the CSEs to determine the estimated fair value of these commercial loan portfolios. These market prices are determined principally by independent pricing services using observable inputs.

Derivative Assets and Derivative Liabilities

This level includes all types of derivative instruments utilized by the Company with the exception of exchange-traded derivatives included within Level 1 and those derivative instruments with unobservable inputs as described in Level 3. These derivatives are principally valued using an income approach.

Interest rate contracts.

Non-option-based — Valuations are based on present value techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, LIBOR basis curves and repurchase rates.

Option-based — Valuations are based on option pricing models, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, LIBOR basis curves and interest rate volatility.

Foreign currency contracts.

Non-option-based — Valuations are based on present value techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, LIBOR basis curves, currency spot rates and cross currency basis curves.

Credit contracts.

Non-option-based — Valuations are based on present value techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, credit curves and recovery rates.

Equity market contracts.

Non-option-based — Valuations are based on present value techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, spot equity index levels and dividend yield curves.

Option-based — Valuations are based on option pricing models, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, spot equity index levels, dividend yield curves and equity volatility.

106

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Separate Account Assets

These assets are comprised of investments that are similar in nature to the fixed maturity securities, equity securities and short-term investments referred to above. Also included are certain mutual funds without readily determinable fair values given prices are not published publicly. Valuation of the mutual funds is based upon quoted prices or reported NAV provided by the fund managers.

Long-term Debt of CSEs

The estimated fair value of the long-term debt of the Company’s CSEs is based on quoted prices when traded as assets in active markets or, if not available, based on market standard valuation methodologies, consistent with the Company’s methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of comparable fixed maturity securities.

Level 3 Measurements:

In general, investments classified within Level 3 use many of the same valuation techniques and inputs as described in Level 2 Measurements. However, if key inputs are unobservable, or if the investments are less liquid and there is very limited trading activity, the investments are generally classified as Level 3. The use of independent non-binding broker quotations to value investments generally indicates there is a lack of liquidity or a lack of transparency in the process to develop the valuation estimates generally causing these investments to be classified in Level 3.

Fixed Maturity Securities, Equity Securities and Short-term Investments

This level includes fixed maturity securities and equity securities priced principally by independent broker quotations or market standard valuation methodologies using inputs that are not market observable or cannot be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. Short-term investments within this level are of a similar nature and class to the Level 3 securities described below; accordingly, the valuation techniques and significant market standard observable inputs used in their valuation are also similar to those described below.

U.S. corporate and foreign corporate securities.  These securities, including financial services industry hybrid securities classified within fixed maturity securities, are principally valued using the market and income approaches. Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing or other similar techniques that utilize unobservable inputs or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data, including illiquidity premiums and spread adjustments to reflect industry trends or specific credit-related issues. Valuations may be based on independent non-binding broker quotations. Generally, below investment grade privately placed or distressed securities included in this level are valued using discounted cash flow methodologies which rely upon significant, unobservable inputs and inputs that cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Structured securities comprised of RMBS, CMBS and ABS.  These securities are principally valued using the market approach. Valuation is based primarily on matrix pricing or other similar techniques that utilize inputs that are unobservable or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data, or are based on independent non-binding broker quotations. Below investment grade securities and RMBS supported by sub-prime mortgage loans included in this level are valued based on inputs including quoted prices for identical or similar securities that are less liquid and based on lower levels of trading activity than securities classified in Level 2, and certain of these securities are valued based on independent non-binding broker quotations.

107

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Foreign government and state and political subdivision securities.  These securities are principally valued using the market approach. Valuation is based primarily on matrix pricing or other similar techniques, however these securities are less liquid and certain of the inputs are based on very limited trading activity.

Common and non-redeemable preferred stock.  These securities, including privately held securities and financial services industry hybrid securities classified within equity securities, are principally valued using the market and income approaches. Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing or other similar techniques using inputs such as comparable credit rating and issuance structure. Equity securities valuations determined with discounted cash flow methodologies use inputs such as earnings multiples based on comparable public companies, and industry-specific non-earnings based multiples. Certain of these securities are valued based on independent non-binding broker quotations.

Derivative Assets and Derivative Liabilities

These derivatives are principally valued using an income approach. Valuations of non-option-based derivatives utilize present value techniques, whereas valuations of option-based derivatives utilize option pricing models. These valuation methodologies generally use the same inputs as described in the corresponding sections above for Level 2 measurements of derivatives. However, these derivatives result in Level 3 classification because one or more of the significant inputs are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Interest rate contracts.

Non-option-based — Significant unobservable inputs may include the extrapolation beyond observable limits of the swap yield curve and LIBOR basis curves.

Option-based — Significant unobservable inputs may include the extrapolation beyond observable limits of the swap yield curve, LIBOR basis curves and interest rate volatility.

Foreign currency contracts.

Non-option-based — Significant unobservable inputs may include the extrapolation beyond observable limits of the swap yield curve, LIBOR basis curves and cross currency basis curves. Certain of these derivatives are valued based on independent non-binding broker quotations.

Credit contracts.

Non-option-based — Significant unobservable inputs may include credit spreads, repurchase rates, and the extrapolation beyond observable limits of the swap yield curve and credit curves. Certain of these derivatives are valued based on independent non-binding broker quotations.

Equity market contracts.

Non-option-based — Significant unobservable inputs may include the extrapolation beyond observable limits of dividend yield curves.

Option-based — Significant unobservable inputs may include the extrapolation beyond observable limits of dividend yield curves and equity volatility.

Direct and Assumed Guaranteed Minimum Benefits

These embedded derivatives are principally valued using an income approach. Valuations are based on option pricing techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include swap yield curve, currency exchange rates

108

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

and implied volatilities. These embedded derivatives result in Level 3 classification because one or more of the significant inputs are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Significant unobservable inputs generally include: the extrapolation beyond observable limits of the swap yield curve and implied volatilities, actuarial assumptions for policyholder behavior and mortality and the potential variability in policyholder behavior and mortality, nonperformance risk and cost of capital for purposes of calculating the risk margin.

Reinsurance Ceded on Certain Guaranteed Minimum Benefits

These embedded derivatives are principally valued using an income approach. The valuation techniques and significant market standard unobservable inputs used in their valuation are similar to those previously described under “Direct and Assumed Guaranteed Minimum Benefits” and also include counterparty credit spreads.

Embedded Derivatives Within Funds Withheld Related to Certain Ceded Reinsurance

These embedded derivatives are principally valued using an income approach. Valuations are based on present value techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve and the fair value of assets within the reference portfolio. These embedded derivatives result in Level 3 classification because one or more of the significant inputs are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Significant unobservable inputs generally include: the fair value of certain assets within the reference portfolio which are not observable in the market and cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Separate Account Assets

These assets are comprised of investments that are similar in nature to the fixed maturity securities and equity securities referred to above. Separate account assets within this level also include other limited partnership interests. Other limited partnership interests are valued giving consideration to the value of the underlying holdings of the partnerships and by applying a premium or discount, if appropriate, for factors such as liquidity, bid/ask spreads, the performance record of the fund manager or other relevant variables which may impact the exit value of the particular partnership interest.

Transfers between Levels 1 and 2:

During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, transfers between Levels 1 and 2 were not significant.

Transfers into or out of Level 3:

Overall, transfers into and/or out of Level 3 are attributable to a change in the observability of inputs. Assets and liabilities are transferred into Level 3 when a significant input cannot be corroborated with market observable data. This occurs when market activity decreases significantly and underlying inputs cannot be observed, current prices are not available, and/or when there are significant variances in quoted prices, thereby affecting transparency. Assets and liabilities are transferred out of Level 3 when circumstances change such that a significant input can be corroborated with market observable data. This may be due to a significant increase in market activity, a specific event, or one or more significant input(s) becoming observable. Transfers into and/or out of any level are assumed to occur at the beginning of the period. Significant transfers into and/or out of Level 3 assets and liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 are summarized below.

Transfers into Level 3 were due primarily to a lack of trading activity, decreased liquidity and credit ratings downgrades (e.g., from investment grade to below investment grade), which have resulted in decreased transparency of valuations and an increased use of broker quotations and unobservable inputs to determine estimated fair value.

109

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

During the year ended December 31, 2011, transfers into Level 3 for fixed maturity securities of $44 million were principally comprised of certain U.S. corporate securities. During the year ended December 31, 2010, transfers into Level 3 for fixed maturity securities of $370 million were principally comprised of U.S. and foreign corporate securities and certain CMBS.

Transfers out of Level 3 resulted primarily from increased transparency of both new issuances that subsequent to issuance and establishment of trading activity, became priced by independent pricing services and existing issuances that, over time, the Company was able to obtain pricing from, or corroborate pricing received from, independent pricing services with observable inputs or increases in market activity and upgraded credit ratings.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, transfers out of Level 3 for fixed maturity securities of $480 million were principally comprised of certain ABS, U.S. and foreign corporate securities and U.S. treasury and agency securities. During the year ended December 31, 2010, transfers out of Level 3 for fixed maturity securities of $358 million and for separate account assets of $3 million were principally comprised of certain U.S. and foreign corporate securities, ABS and CMBS.

The following tables summarize the change of all assets and (liabilities) measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), including realized and unrealized gains (losses) of all assets and (liabilities) and realized and unrealized gains (losses) of all assets and (liabilities) still held at the end of the respective time periods:

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Fixed Maturity Securities:
	U.S. Corporate Securities			Foreign Corporate Securities			U.S. Treasury and Agency Securities			RMBS			CMBS			State and Political Subdivision   Securities			ABS			Foreign Government   Securities
	(In millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2011:
Balance, January 1,	$	1,510		$	880		$	34		$	282		$	130		$	32		$	321		$	14
Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in:
Earnings: (1), (2)
Net investment income		6			1			—			1			—			—			—			—
Net investment gains (losses)		32			(20	)		—			(5	)		—			—			(6	)		—
Net derivative gains (losses)		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Other comprehensive income (loss)		80			22			—			(9	)		19			(8	)		8			—
Purchases (3)		76			282			—			16			17			—			166			—
Sales (3)		(175	)		(515	)		—			(34	)		(19	)		(1	)		(46	)		(12	)
Issuances (3)		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Settlements (3)		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Transfers into Level 3 (4)		40			3			—			1			—			—			—			—
Transfers out of Level 3 (4)		(137	)		(73	)		(34	)		(13	)		—			—			(223	)		—
Balance, December 31,	$	1,432		$	580		$	—		$	239		$	147		$	23		$	220		$	2
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2011 included in earnings:
Net investment income	$	6		$	1		$	—		$	1		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Net investment gains (losses)	$	—		$	(9	)	$	—		$	(5	)	$	—		$	—		$	(2	)	$	—
Net derivative gains (losses)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—

110

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Equity Securities:									Net Derivatives: (5)
	Common Stock			Non- redeemable Preferred Stock			Short-term Investments			Interest Rate Contracts			Foreign Currency Contracts		Credit Contracts			Equity Market Contracts			Net Embedded Derivatives (6)		Separate Account Assets (7)
	(In millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2011:
Balance, January 1,	$	22		$	214		$	173		$	(61	)	$	—	$	11		$	12		$	677	$	133
Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in:
Earnings: (1), (2)
Net investment income		—			—			—			—			—		—			—			—		—
Net investment gains (losses)		2			(24	)		(1	)		—			—		—			—			—		(7	)
Net derivative gains (losses)		—			—			—			50			—		(10	)		32			277		—
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(6	)		1			—			199			—		—			—			—		—
Purchases (3)		9			—			10			—			—		—			3			—		5
Sales (3)		(6	)		(115	)		(172	)		—			—		—			—			—		(1	)
Issuances (3)		—			—			—			—			—		(1	)		(4	)		—		—
Settlements (3)		—			—			—			(13	)		—		(1	)		—			78		—
Transfers into Level 3 (4)		—			—			—			(1	)		—		—			—			—		—
Transfers out of Level 3 (4)		—			—			—			—			—		—			—			—		—
Balance, December 31,	$	21		$	76		$	10		$	174		$	—	$	(1	)	$	43		$	1,032	$	130
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2011 included in earnings:
Net investment income	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—
Net investment gains (losses)	$	—		$	(3	)	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—
Net derivative gains (losses)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	39		$	—	$	(10	)	$	33		$	279	$	—

111

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Fixed Maturity Securities:
	U.S. Corporate Securities			Foreign Corporate Securities			U.S. Treasury and Agency Securities			RMBS			CMBS			State and Political Subdivision Securities			ABS			Foreign Government Securities
	(In millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2010:
Balance, January 1,	$	1,605		$	994		$	33		$	272		$	45		$	32		$	290		$	16
Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in:
Earnings: (1), (2)
Net investment income		7			(1	)		—			1			—			—			1			—
Net investment gains (losses)		(5	)		(3	)		—			(4	)		—			—			(5	)		—
Net derivative gains (losses)		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Other comprehensive income (loss)		79			90			2			47			21			4			34			—
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements (3)		(173	)		(199	)		(1	)		(48	)		1			(1	)		53			4
Transfers into Level 3 (4)		147			114			—			21			85			—			—			3
Transfers out of Level 3 (4)		(150	)		(115	)		—			(7	)		(22	)		(3	)		(52	)		(9	)
Balance, December 31,	$	1,510		$	880		$	34		$	282		$	130		$	32		$	321		$	14
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2010 included in earnings:
Net investment income	$	6		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	1		$	—
Net investment gains (losses)	$	(10	)	$	—		$	—		$	(2	)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Net derivative gains (losses)	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Equity Securities:							Net Derivatives: (5)
	Common Stock		Non- redeemable Preferred Stock			Short-term Investments		Interest Rate Contracts			Foreign Currency Contracts			Credit Contracts			Equity Market Contracts			Net Embedded Derivatives (6)		Separate Account Assets (7)
	(In millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2010:
Balance, January 1,	$	11	$	258		$	8	$	2		$	23		$	4		$	18		$	445	$	153
Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in:
Earnings: (1), (2)
Net investment income		—		—			1		—			—			—			—			—		—
Net investment gains (losses)		5		15			—		—			—			—			—			—		(5	)
Net derivative gains (losses)		—		—			—		10			—			3			(6	)		135		—
Other comprehensive income (loss)		3		6			—		(71	)		—			13			—			—		—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (3)		3		(65	)		164		(2	)		—			(9	)		—			97		(12	)
Transfers into Level 3 (4)		—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—		—
Transfers out of Level 3 (4)		—		—			—		—			(23	)		—			—			—		(3	)
Balance, December 31,	$	22	$	214		$	173	$	(61	)	$	—		$	11		$	12		$	677	$	133
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2010 included in earnings:
Net investment income	$	—	$	—		$	1	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—
Net investment gains (losses)	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—	$	—
Net derivative gains (losses)	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	10		$	—		$	3		$	(6	)	$	137	$	—

112

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Fixed Maturity Securities:
	U.S.   Corporate   Securities		Foreign   Corporate   Securities		U.S. Treasury and Agency Securities		RMBS		CMBS		State and Political   Subdivision   Securities		ABS		Foreign Government Securities
	(In millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2009:
Balance, January 1,	$	1,401	$	926	$	36	$	323	$	116	$	24	$	297	$	10
Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in:
Earnings: (1), (2)
Net investment income		3		(1)		—		—		1		—		—		—
Net investment gains (losses)		(117)		(94)		—		—		(43)		—		(55)		—
Net derivative gains (losses)		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Other comprehensive income (loss)		192		334		(1)		39		50		6		137		1
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements (3)		(172)		(47)		(2)		(45)		(7)		2		(102)		(1)
Transfers into and/or out of Level 3 (4)		298		(124)		—		(45)		(72)		—		13		6
Balance, December 31,	$	1,605	$	994	$	33	$	272	$	45	$	32	$	290	$	16
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2009 included in earnings:
Net investment income	$	6	$	(1)	$	—	$	—	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	—
Net investment gains (losses)	$	(105)	$	(43)	$	—	$	(25)	$	(56)	$	—	$	4	$	—
Net derivative gains (losses)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Equity Securities:				Short-term    Investments		Other    Securities		Net    Derivatives (5)		Net Embedded Derivatives (6)		Separate Account Assets (7)
	Common     Stock		Non- redeemable Preferred      Stock
	(In millions)
Year Ended December 31, 2009:
Balance, January 1,	$	8	$	318	$	—	$	50	$	309	$	657	$	159
Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in:
Earnings: (1), (2)
Net investment income		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Net investment gains (losses)		—		(101)		—		—		—		—		—
Net derivative gains (losses)		—		—		—		—		(40)		(328)		(7)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(1)		113		—		—		(3)		—		—
Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (3)		4		(66)		8		(50)		(15)		116		1
Transfers into and/or out of Level 3 (4)		—		(6)		—		—		(204)		—		—
Balance, December 31,	$	11	$	258	$	8	$	—	$	47	$	445	$	153
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities still held at December 31, 2009 included in earnings:
Net investment income	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Net investment gains (losses)	$	—	$	(38)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Net derivative gains (losses)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	(33)	$	(332)	$	—

(1) Amortization of premium/discount is included within net investment income. Impairments charged to earnings on securities are included within net investment gains (losses). Lapses associated with embedded derivatives are included within net derivative gains (losses).

(2) Interest and dividend accruals, as well as cash interest coupons and dividends received, are excluded from the roll forward.

(3) The amount reported within purchases, sales, issuances and settlements is the purchase or issuance price and the sales or settlement proceeds based upon the actual date purchased or issued and sold or settled,

113

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

respectively. Items purchased/issued and sold/settled in the same period are excluded from the rollforward. For the year ended December 31, 2011, fees attributed to net embedded derivatives are included within settlements. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, fees attributed to net embedded derivatives are included within purchases, sales, issuances and settlements.

(4) Total gains and losses (in earnings and other comprehensive income (loss)) are calculated assuming transfers into and/or out of Level 3 occurred at the beginning of the period. Items transferred into and/or out of Level 3 in the same period are excluded from the rollforward.

(5) Freestanding derivative assets and liabilities are presented net for purposes of the rollforward.

(6) Embedded derivative assets and liabilities are presented net for purposes of the rollforward.

(7) Investment performance related to separate account assets is fully offset by corresponding amounts credited to contractholders within separate account liabilities. Therefore, such changes in estimated fair value are not recorded in net income. For the purpose of this disclosure, these changes are presented within net investment gains (losses).

Fair Value Option

Assets and Liabilities Held by CSEs

The Company has elected the FVO for the following assets and liabilities held by CSEs: commercial mortgage loans and long-term debt. The following table presents these commercial mortgage loans carried under the FVO at:

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Unpaid principal balance	$	3,019	$	6,636
Excess of estimated fair value over unpaid principal balance		119		204
Carrying value at estimated fair value	$	3,138	$	6,840

The following table presents the long-term debt carried under the FVO related to the commercial mortgage loans at:

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Contractual principal balance	$	2,925	$	6,541
Excess of estimated fair value over contractual principal balance		140		232
Carrying value at estimated fair value	$	3,065	$	6,773

Interest income on commercial mortgage loans held by CSEs is recorded in net investment income. Interest expense on long-term debt of CSEs is recorded in other expenses. Gains and losses from initial measurement, subsequent changes in estimated fair value and gains or losses on sales of both the commercial mortgage loans and long-term debt are recognized in net investment gains (losses). See Note 2.

114

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements

Certain assets are measured at estimated fair value on a non-recurring basis and are not included in the tables presented above. The amounts below relate to certain investments measured at estimated fair value during the period and still held at the reporting dates.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011							2010							2009
	Carrying Value Prior to Measurement		Estimated Fair Value After Measurement		Net Investment Gains (Losses)			Carrying Value Prior to Measurement		Estimated Fair Value After Measurement		Net Investment Gains (Losses)			Carrying Value Prior to Measurement		Estimated Fair Value After Measurement		Net Investment Gains (Losses)
	(In millions)
Mortgage loans, net (1)	$	—	$	8	$	8		$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—
Other limited partnership interests (2)	$	7	$	5	$	(2	)	$	33	$	22	$	(11	)	$	110	$	44	$	(66)
Real estate joint ventures (3)	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	25	$	5	$	(20	)	$	90	$	48	$	(42)

(1) Mortgage loans — The impaired mortgage loans presented above were written down to their estimated fair values at the date the impairments were recognized and are reported as losses above. Subsequent improvements in estimated fair value on previously impaired loans recorded through a reduction in the previously established valuation allowance are reported as gains above. Estimated fair values for impaired mortgage loans are based on observable market prices or, if the loans are in foreclosure or are otherwise determined to be collateral dependent, on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, or the present value of the expected future cash flows. Impairments to estimated fair value and decreases in previous impairments from subsequent improvements in estimated fair value represent non-recurring fair value measurements that have been categorized as Level 3 due to the lack of price transparency inherent in the limited markets for such mortgage loans.

(2) Other limited partnership interests — The impaired investments presented above were accounted for using the cost method. Impairments on these cost method investments were recognized at estimated fair value determined from information provided in the financial statements of the underlying entities in the period in which the impairment was incurred. These impairments to estimated fair value represent non-recurring fair value measurements that have been classified as Level 3 due to the limited activity and price transparency inherent in the market for such investments. This category includes several private equity and debt funds that typically invest primarily in a diversified pool of investments using certain investment strategies including domestic and international leveraged buyout funds; power, energy, timber and infrastructure development funds; venture capital funds; and below investment grade debt and mezzanine debt funds. The estimated fair values of these investments have been determined using the NAV of the Company’s ownership interest in the partners’ capital. Distributions from these investments will be generated from investment gains, from operating income from the underlying investments of the funds and from liquidation of the underlying assets of the funds. It is estimated that the underlying assets of the funds will be liquidated over the next two to 10 years. Unfunded commitments for these investments were $3 million and $23 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

(3) Real estate joint ventures — The impaired investments presented above were accounted for using the cost method. Impairments on these cost method investments were recognized at estimated fair value determined from information provided in the financial statements of the underlying entities in the period in which the impairment was incurred. These impairments to estimated fair value represent non-recurring fair value measurements that have been classified as Level 3 due to the limited activity and price transparency inherent in the market for such investments. This category includes several real estate funds that typically invest primarily in commercial real estate. The estimated fair values of these investments have been determined using the NAV of the Company’s ownership interest in the partners’ capital. Distributions from these investments will be generated from investment gains, from operating income from the underlying investments of the funds and from liquidation of the underlying assets of the funds. It is estimated that the

115

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

underlying assets of the funds will be liquidated over the next two to 10 years. There were no unfunded commitments for these investments at December 31, 2011. Unfunded commitments for these investments were $3 million at December 31, 2010.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Amounts related to the Company’s financial instruments that were not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, were as follows:

	December 31,
	2011						2010
	Notional   Amount		Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value		Notional   Amount		Carrying Value		Estimated Fair Value
	(In millions)
Assets:
Mortgage loans, net (1)			$	6,662	$	6,946			$	5,890	$	6,022
Policy loans			$	1,203	$	1,307			$	1,190	$	1,260
Real estate joint ventures (2)			$	69	$	107			$	79	$	102
Other limited partnership interests (2)			$	98	$	126			$	104	$	116
Short-term investments (3)			$	19	$	19			$	88	$	88
Other invested assets (2)			$	430	$	477				—		—
Cash and cash equivalents			$	745	$	745			$	1,928	$	1,928
Accrued investment income			$	568	$	568			$	559	$	559
Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables (2)			$	5,973	$	6,880			$	5,959	$	6,164
Liabilities:
PABs (2)			$	23,144	$	24,732			$	24,622	$	26,061
Payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions			$	8,079	$	8,079			$	8,103	$	8,103
Long-term debt (4)			$	792	$	970			$	795	$	930
Other liabilities (2)			$	224	$	224			$	294	$	294
Separate account liabilities (2)			$	1,240	$	1,240			$	1,407	$	1,407
Commitments: (5)
Mortgage loan commitments	$	167	$	—	$	—	$	270	$	—	$	(2	)
Commitments to fund bank credit facilities and private corporate bond investments	$	248	$	—	$	7	$	315	$	—	$	(12	)

(1) Mortgage loans as presented in the table above differ from the amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheets because this table does not include commercial mortgage loans held by CSEs, which are accounted for under the FVO.

(2) Carrying values presented herein differ from those presented in the consolidated balance sheets because certain items within the respective financial statement caption are not considered financial instruments. Financial statement captions excluded from the table above are not considered financial instruments.

(3) Short-term investments as presented in the table above differ from the amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheets because this table does not include short-term investments that meet the definition of a security, which are measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis.

116

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

(4) Long-term debt as presented in the table above does not include long-term debt of CSEs, which is accounted for under the FVO.

(5) Commitments are off-balance sheet obligations. Negative estimated fair values represent off-balance sheet liabilities.

The methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments are summarized as follows:

The assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis include: fixed maturity securities, equity securities, other securities, certain short-term investments, mortgage loans held by CSEs, derivative assets and liabilities, net embedded derivatives within asset and liability host contracts, separate account assets and long-term debt of CSEs. These assets and liabilities are described in the section “— Recurring Fair Value Measurements” and, therefore, are excluded from the table above. The estimated fair value for these financial instruments approximates carrying value.

Mortgage Loans

The Company originates mortgage loans principally for investment purposes. These loans are principally carried at amortized cost. The estimated fair value of mortgage loans is primarily determined by estimating expected future cash flows and discounting them using current interest rates for similar mortgage loans with similar credit risk.

Policy Loans

For policy loans with fixed interest rates, estimated fair values are determined using a discounted cash flow model applied to groups of similar policy loans determined by the nature of the underlying insurance liabilities. Cash flow estimates are developed by applying a weighted-average interest rate to the outstanding principal balance of the respective group of policy loans and an estimated average maturity determined through experience studies of the past performance of policyholder repayment behavior for similar loans. These cash flows are discounted using current risk-free interest rates with no adjustment for borrower credit risk as these loans are fully collateralized by the cash surrender value of the underlying insurance policy. The estimated fair value for policy loans with variable interest rates approximates carrying value due to the absence of borrower credit risk and the short time period between interest rate resets, which presents minimal risk of a material change in estimated fair value due to changes in market interest rates.

Real Estate Joint Ventures and Other Limited Partnership Interests

Real estate joint ventures and other limited partnership interests included in the preceding table consist of those investments accounted for using the cost method. The remaining carrying value recognized in the consolidated balance sheets represents investments in real estate carried at cost less accumulated depreciation, or real estate joint ventures and other limited partnership interests accounted for using the equity method, which do not meet the definition of financial instruments for which fair value is required to be disclosed.

The estimated fair values for real estate joint ventures and other limited partnership interests accounted for under the cost method are generally based on the Company’s share of the NAV as provided in the financial statements of the investees. In certain circumstances, management may adjust the NAV by a premium or discount when it has sufficient evidence to support applying such adjustments.

117

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Short-term Investments

Certain short-term investments do not qualify as securities and are recognized at amortized cost in the consolidated balance sheets. For these instruments, the Company believes that there is minimal risk of material changes in interest rates or credit of the issuer such that estimated fair value approximates carrying value. In light of recent market conditions, short-term investments have been monitored to ensure there is sufficient demand and maintenance of issuer credit quality and the Company has determined additional adjustment is not required.

Other Invested Assets

Other invested assets within the preceding table are comprised of loans to affiliates. The estimated fair value of loans to affiliates is determined by discounting the expected future cash flows using market interest rates currently available for instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Due to the short-term maturities of cash and cash equivalents, the Company believes there is minimal risk of material changes in interest rates or credit of the issuer such that estimated fair value generally approximates carrying value. In light of recent market conditions, cash and cash equivalent instruments have been monitored to ensure there is sufficient demand and maintenance of issuer credit quality, or sufficient solvency in the case of depository institutions, and the Company has determined additional adjustment is not required.

Accrued Investment Income

Due to the short term until settlement of accrued investment income, the Company believes there is minimal risk of material changes in interest rates or credit of the issuer such that estimated fair value approximates carrying value. In light of recent market conditions, the Company has monitored the credit quality of the issuers and has determined additional adjustment is not required.

Premiums, Reinsurance and Other Receivables

Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables in the preceding table are principally comprised of certain amounts recoverable under reinsurance agreements, amounts on deposit with financial institutions to facilitate daily settlements related to certain derivative positions and amounts receivable for securities sold but not yet settled.

Premiums receivable and those amounts recoverable under reinsurance agreements determined to transfer significant risk are not financial instruments subject to disclosure and thus have been excluded from the amounts presented in the preceding table. Amounts recoverable under ceded reinsurance agreements, which the Company has determined do not transfer significant risk such that they are accounted for using the deposit method of accounting, have been included in the preceding table. The estimated fair value is determined as the present value of expected future cash flows, which were discounted using an interest rate determined to reflect the appropriate credit standing of the assuming counterparty.

The amounts on deposit for derivative settlements essentially represent the equivalent of demand deposit balances and amounts due for securities sold are generally received over short periods such that the estimated fair value approximates carrying value. In light of recent market conditions, the Company has monitored the solvency position of the financial institutions and has determined additional adjustments are not required.

118

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

PABs

PABs in the table above include investment contracts. Embedded derivatives on investment contracts and certain variable annuity guarantees accounted for as embedded derivatives are included in this caption in the consolidated financial statements but excluded from this caption in the table above as they are separately presented in “— Recurring Fair Value Measurements.” The remaining difference between the amounts reflected as PABs in the preceding table and those recognized in the consolidated balance sheets represents those amounts due under contracts that satisfy the definition of insurance contracts and are not considered financial instruments.

The investment contracts primarily include certain funding agreements, fixed deferred annuities, modified guaranteed annuities, fixed term payout annuities and total control accounts. The fair values for these investment contracts are estimated by discounting best estimate future cash flows using current market risk-free interest rates and adding a spread to reflect the nonperformance risk in the liability.

Payables for Collateral Under Securities Loaned and Other Transactions

The estimated fair value for payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions approximates carrying value. The related agreements to loan securities are short-term in nature such that the Company believes there is limited risk of a material change in market interest rates. Additionally, because borrowers are cross-collateralized by the borrowed securities, the Company believes no additional consideration for changes in nonperformance risk are necessary.

Long-term Debt

The estimated fair value of long-term debt is generally determined by discounting expected future cash flows using market rates currently available for debt with similar remaining maturities and reflecting the credit risk of the Company, including inputs when available, from actively traded debt of other companies with similar types of borrowing arrangements. Risk-adjusted discount rates applied to the expected future cash flows can vary significantly based upon the specific terms of each individual arrangement, including, but not limited to: contractual interest rates in relation to current market rates, the structuring of the arrangement, and the nature and observability of the applicable valuation inputs. Use of different risk-adjusted discount rates could result in different estimated fair values.

Other Liabilities

Other liabilities included in the table above reflect those other liabilities that satisfy the definition of financial instruments subject to disclosure. These items consist primarily of interest payable, amounts due for securities purchased but not yet settled, and funds withheld amounts payable which are contractually withheld by the Company in accordance with the terms of the reinsurance agreements. The Company evaluates the specific terms, facts and circumstances of each instrument to determine the appropriate estimated fair values, which are not materially different from the carrying values.

Separate Account Liabilities

Separate account liabilities included in the preceding table represent those balances due to policyholders under contracts that are classified as investment contracts. The remaining amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheets represent those contracts classified as insurance contracts, which do not satisfy the definition of financial instruments.

Separate account liabilities classified as investment contracts primarily represent variable annuities with no significant mortality risk to the Company such that the death benefit is equal to the account balance and certain contracts that provide for benefit funding.

119

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Separate account liabilities are recognized in the consolidated balance sheets at an equivalent value of the related separate account assets. Separate account assets, which equal net deposits, net investment income and realized and unrealized investment gains and losses, are fully offset by corresponding amounts credited to the contractholders’ liability which is reflected in separate account liabilities. Since separate account liabilities are fully funded by cash flows from the separate account assets which are recognized at estimated fair value as described in the section “— Recurring Fair Value Measurements,” the Company believes the value of those assets approximates the estimated fair value of the related separate account liabilities.

Mortgage Loan Commitments and Commitments to Fund Bank Credit Facilities and Private Corporate Bond Investments

The estimated fair values for mortgage loan commitments that will be held for investment and commitments to fund bank credit facilities and private corporate bonds that will be held for investment reflected in the above table represents the difference between the discounted expected future cash flows using interest rates that incorporate current credit risk for similar instruments on the reporting date and the principal amounts of the commitments.

5. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Value of Business Acquired

Information regarding DAC and VOBA was as follows:

	DAC		VOBA		Total
	(In millions)
Balance at January 1, 2009	$	2,216	$	2,661	$	4,877
Capitalizations		703		—		703
Subtotal		2,919		2,661		5,580
Amortization related to:
Net investment gains (losses)		195		86		281
Other expenses		(357)		(197)		(554)
Total amortization		(162)		(111)		(273)
Unrealized investment gains (losses)		(301)		(433)		(734)
Effect of foreign currency translation		2		—		2
Balance at December 31, 2009		2,458		2,117		4,575
Capitalizations		858		—		858
Subtotal		3,316		2,117		5,433
Amortization related to:
Net investment gains (losses)		(57)		(17)		(74)
Other expenses		(399)		(297)		(696)
Total amortization		(456)		(314)		(770)
Unrealized investment gains (losses)		(155)		(117)		(272)
Balance at December 31, 2010		2,705		1,686		4,391
Capitalizations		1,342		—		1,342
Subtotal		4,047		1,686		5,733
Amortization related to:
Net investment gains (losses)		(339)		(29)		(368)
Other expenses		(474)		(314)		(788)
Total amortization		(813)		(343)		(1,156)
Unrealized investment gains (losses)		(49)		(337)		(386)
Effect of foreign currency translation		(3)		—		(3)
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	3,182	$	1,006	$	4,188

120

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The estimated future amortization expense allocated to other expenses for the next five years for VOBA is $245 million in 2012, $192 million in 2013, $155 million in 2014, $124 million in 2015 and $101 million in 2016.

Amortization of DAC and VOBA is attributed to both investment gains and losses and to other expenses for the amount of gross margins or profits originating from transactions other than investment gains and losses. Unrealized investment gains and losses represent the amount of DAC and VOBA that would have been amortized if such gains and losses had been recognized.

See Note 1 for information on the retrospective application of the adoption of new accounting guidance related to DAC.

Information regarding DAC and VOBA by segment, as well as Corporate & Other, was as follows:

	DAC				VOBA				Total
	December 31,
	2011		2010		2011		2010		2011		2010
	(In millions)
Retail Products	$	3,042	$	2,618	$	1,005	$	1,685	$	4,047	$	4,303
Corporate Benefit Funding		12		8		1		1		13		9
Corporate & Other		128		79		—		—		128		79
Total	$	3,182	$	2,705	$	1,006	$	1,686	$	4,188	$	4,391

6. Goodwill

Goodwill is the excess of cost over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired. In the first quarter of 2012, the Company reorganized its business into two segments: Retail Products and Corporate Benefit Funding. See Note 14 for a discussion on the Company’s new segments. As a result of the reorganization, the Company reallocated goodwill from the former segments to the new segments. Information regarding goodwill was as follows:

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Retail Products	$	236	$	236
Corporate Benefit Funding		307		307
Corporate & Other		410		410
Total	$	953	$	953

The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment tests during the third quarter of 2011 based upon data at June 30, 2011 and concluded that the fair values of all reporting units were in excess of their carrying values and, therefore, goodwill was not impaired. Such tests are described in more detail in Note 1.

Management continues to evaluate current market conditions that may affect the estimated fair value of the Company’s reporting units to assess whether any goodwill impairment exists. Deteriorating or adverse market conditions for certain reporting units may have a significant impact on the estimated fair value of these reporting units and could result in future impairments of goodwill.

121

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

7. Insurance

Insurance Liabilities

Insurance liabilities, including affiliated insurance liabilities on reinsurance assumed and ceded, were as follows:

	Future Policy Benefits				Policyholder Account Balances				Other Policy-Related Balances
	December 31,
	2011		2010		2011		2010		2011		2010
	(In millions)
Retail Products	$	5,175	$	4,304	$	30,001	$	27,580	$	2,577	$	2,285
Corporate Benefit Funding		14,028		12,991		8,375		9,452		14		5
Corporate & Other		6,280		5,903		3,699		2,259		398		362
Total	$	25,483	$	23,198	$	42,075	$	39,291	$	2,989	$	2,652

See Note 8 for discussion of affiliated reinsurance liabilities included in the table above.

Value of Distribution Agreements and Customer Relationships Acquired

Information regarding VODA and VOCRA, which are reported in other assets, was as follows:

	Amount
	(In millions)
Balance at January 1, 2009	$	224
Amortization		(9)
Balance at December 31, 2009		215
Amortization		(12)
Balance at December 31, 2010		203
Amortization		(13)
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	190

The estimated future amortization expense allocated to other expenses for the next five years for VODA and VOCRA is $15 million in 2012, $16 million in 2013, $17 million in 2014, $17 million in 2015 and $15 million in 2016.

122

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Sales Inducements

Information regarding deferred sales inducements, which are reported in other assets, was as follows:

	Amount
	(In millions)
Balance at January 1, 2009	$	422
Capitalization		124
Amortization		(53)
Balance at December 31, 2009		493
Capitalization		100
Amortization		(56)
Balance at December 31, 2010		537
Capitalization		79
Amortization		(81)
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	535

Separate Accounts

Separate account assets and liabilities primarily include pass-through separate accounts totaling $72.4 billion and $61.6 billion at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, for which the policyholder assumes all investment risk.

For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, there were no investment gains (losses) on transfers of assets from the general account to the separate accounts.

Obligations Under Funding Agreements

The Company issues fixed and floating rate funding agreements, which are denominated in either U.S. dollars or foreign currencies, to certain special purpose entities (“SPEs”) that have issued either debt securities or commercial paper for which payment of interest and principal is secured by such funding agreements. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company issued $12.5 billion, $19.1 billion and $14.5 billion, respectively, and repaid $13.4 billion, $18.6 billion and $15.3 billion, respectively, of such funding agreements. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, funding agreements outstanding, which are included in PABs, were $5.4 billion and $6.6 billion, respectively.

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Boston and held $70 million of common stock of the FHLB of Boston at both December 31, 2011 and 2010, which is included in equity securities.

The Company has also entered into funding agreements. The liability for funding agreements is included in PABs. Information related to the funding agreements was as follows:

	Liability				Collateral
	December 31,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
	(In millions)
FHLB of Boston (1)	$	450	$	100	$	518  (2)	$	211  (2)
Farmer Mac (3)	$	200	$	200	$	230  (4)	$	231  (4)

123

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

(1) Represents funding agreements issued to the FHLB of Boston in exchange for cash and for which the FHLB of Boston has been granted a blanket lien on certain assets, including RMBS, to collateralize obligations under the funding agreements. The Company maintains control over these pledged assets, and may use, commingle, encumber or dispose of any portion of the collateral as long as there is no event of default and the remaining qualified collateral is sufficient to satisfy the collateral maintenance level. Upon any event of default by the Company, the FHLB of Boston’s recovery on the collateral is limited to the amount of the Company’s liability to the FHLB of Boston.

(2) Advances are collateralized by mortgage-backed securities. The amount of collateral presented is at estimated fair value.

(3) Represents funding agreements issued to certain SPEs that have issued debt securities for which payment of interest and principal is secured by such funding agreements, and such debt securities are also guaranteed as to payment of interest and principal by the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, a federally chartered instrumentality of the United States (“Farmer Mac”).

(4) Secured by a pledge of certain eligible agricultural real estate mortgage loans. The amount of collateral presented is at carrying value.

Liabilities for Unpaid Claims and Claim Expenses

Information regarding the liabilities for unpaid claims and claim expenses relating to group accident and non-medical health policies and contracts, which are reported in future policy benefits and other policy-related balances, was as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
	(In millions)
Balance at January 1,	$	978		$	805		$	691
Less: Reinsurance recoverables		878			706			589
Net balance at January 1,		100			99			102
Incurred related to:
Current year		5			24			26
Prior years		4			(12	)		(17	)
Total incurred		9			12			9
Paid related to:
Current year		—			(1	)		(1	)
Prior years		(10	)		(10	)		(11	)
Total paid		(10	)		(11	)		(12	)
Net balance at December 31,		99			100			99
Add: Reinsurance recoverables		980			878			706
Balance at December 31,	$	1,079		$	978		$	805

During 2011, 2010 and 2009, claim and claim adjustment expenses associated with prior years increased by $4 million and decreased by $12 million and $17 million, respectively, due to differences between the actual benefits paid and expected benefits owed during those periods.

124

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Guarantees

The Company issues annuity contracts which may include contractual guarantees to the contractholder for: (i) return of no less than total deposits made to the contract less any partial withdrawals (“return of net deposits”); and (ii) the highest contract value on a specified anniversary date minus any withdrawals following the contract anniversary, or total deposits made to the contract less any partial withdrawals plus a minimum return (“anniversary contract value” or “minimum return”). These guarantees include benefits that are payable in the event of death or at annuitization.

The Company also issues universal and variable life contracts where the Company contractually guarantees to the contractholder a secondary guarantee.

Information regarding the types of guarantees relating to annuity contracts and universal and variable life contracts was as follows:

	December 31,
	2011				2010
	In the Event of Death		At Annuitization		In the Event of Death		At Annuitization
	(In millions)
Annuity Contracts (1)
Return of Net Deposits
Separate account value	$	27,161		N/A	$	21,840		N/A
Net amount at risk (2)		$795 (3)		N/A	$	415 (3)		N/A
Average attained age of contractholders		63 years		N/A		62 years		N/A
Anniversary Contract Value or Minimum Return
Separate account value	$	49,389	$	41,713	$	42,553	$	30,613
Net amount at risk (2)	$	4,720 (3)	$	6,595 (4)	$	3,200 (3)	$	3,523 (4)
Average attained age of contractholders		62 years		62 years		60 years		62 years
					December 31,
					2011		2010
					Secondary Guarantees
					(In millions)
Universal and Variable Life Contracts (1)
Account value (general and separate account)					$	5,177	$	3,740
Net amount at risk (2)					$	80,477 (3)	$	51,639 (3)
Average attained age of policyholders						58 years		59 years

(1) The Company’s annuity and life contracts with guarantees may offer more than one type of guarantee in each contract. Therefore, the amounts listed above may not be mutually exclusive.

(2) The net amount at risk is based on the direct and assumed amount at risk (excluding ceded reinsurance).

(3) The net amount at risk for guarantees of amounts in the event of death is defined as the current GMDB in excess of the current account balance at the balance sheet date.

(4) The net amount at risk for guarantees of amounts at annuitization is defined as the present value of the minimum guaranteed annuity payments available to the contractholder determined in accordance with the terms of the contract in excess of the current account balance.

125

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Information regarding the liabilities for guarantees (excluding base policy liabilities) relating to annuity and universal and variable life contracts was as follows:

	Annuity Contracts					Universal and Variable Life Contracts		Total
	Guaranteed Death Benefits			Guaranteed Annuitization Benefits		Secondary Guarantees
	(In millions)
Direct
Balance at January 1, 2009	$	98		$	221	$	108	$	427
Incurred guaranteed benefits		48			(6)		187		229
Paid guaranteed benefits		(89)			—		—		(89)
Balance at December 31, 2009		57			215		295		567
Incurred guaranteed benefits		52			66		601		719
Paid guaranteed benefits		(30)			—		—		(30)
Balance at December 31, 2010		79			281		896		1,256
Incurred guaranteed benefits		84			128		140		352
Paid guaranteed benefits		(25)			—		—		(25)
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	138		$	409	$	1,036	$	1,583
Ceded
Balance at January 1, 2009	$	86		$	72	$	—	$	158
Incurred guaranteed benefits		38			2		142		182
Paid guaranteed benefits		(68)			—		—		(68)
Balance at December 31, 2009		56			74		142		272
Incurred guaranteed benefits		38			23		515		576
Paid guaranteed benefits		(18)			—		—		(18)
Balance at December 31, 2010		76			97		657		830
Incurred guaranteed benefits		59			42		110		211
Paid guaranteed benefits		(21)			—		—		(21	)
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	114		$	139	$	767	$	1,020
Net
Balance at January 1, 2009	$	12		$	149	$	108	$	269
Incurred guaranteed benefits		10			(8)		45		47
Paid guaranteed benefits		(21)			—		—		(21)
Balance at December 31, 2009		1			141		153		295
Incurred guaranteed benefits		14			43		86		143
Paid guaranteed benefits		(12)			—		—		(12)
Balance at December 31, 2010		3			184		239		426
Incurred guaranteed benefits		25			86		30		141
Paid guaranteed benefits		(4	)		—		—		(4)
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	24		$	270	$	269	$	563

126

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Account balances of contracts with insurance guarantees were invested in separate account asset classes as follows at:

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Fund Groupings:
Equity	$	33,482	$	34,207
Balanced		29,189		19,552
Bond		4,132		4,330
Money Market		1,077		1,136
Specialty		1,002		1,004
Total	$	68,882	$	60,229

8. Reinsurance

The Company participates in reinsurance activities in order to limit losses, minimize exposure to significant risks and provide additional capacity for future growth.

Retail Products

For its Retail Life insurance products, the Company has historically reinsured the mortality risk primarily on an excess of retention basis or a quota share basis. The Company currently reinsures 90% of the mortality risk in excess of $1 million for most products and reinsures up to 90% of the mortality risk for certain other products. In addition to reinsuring mortality risk as described above, the Company reinsures other risks, as well as specific coverages. Placement of reinsurance is done primarily on an automatic basis and also on a facultative basis for risks with specified characteristics. On a case by case basis, the Company may retain up to $5 million per life on single life individual policies and reinsure 100% of amounts in excess of the amount the Company retains. The Company evaluates its reinsurance programs routinely and may increase or decrease its retention at any time. The Company also reinsures the risk associated with secondary death benefit guarantees on certain universal life insurance policies to an affiliate.

The Company’s Retail Annuities business reinsures 100% of the living and death benefit guarantees associated with its variable annuities issued since 2006 to an affiliated reinsurer and certain portions of the living and death benefit guarantees associated with its variable annuities issued prior to 2006 to affiliated and unaffiliated reinsurers. Under these reinsurance agreements, the Company pays a reinsurance premium generally based on fees associated with the guarantees collected from policyholders, and receives reimbursement for benefits paid or accrued in excess of account values, subject to certain limitations. The Company also reinsures 90% of its new production of fixed annuities to an affiliated reinsurer.

Corporate Benefit Funding

The Company’s Corporate Benefit Funding segment periodically engages in reinsurance activities, as considered appropriate. The impact of these activities on the financial results of this segment has not been significant.

Corporate & Other

The Company also reinsures, through 100% quota share reinsurance agreements, certain run-off LTC and workers’ compensation business written by the Company.

127

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

For other policies within Corporate & Other, the Company generally retains most of the risk and only cedes particular risks on certain client arrangements.

Catastrophe Coverage

The Company has exposure to catastrophes, which could contribute to significant fluctuations in the Company’s results of operations. The Company uses excess of retention and quota share reinsurance agreements to provide greater diversification of risk and minimize exposure to larger risks.

Reinsurance Recoverables

The Company reinsures its business through a diversified group of well-capitalized, highly rated reinsurers. The Company analyzes recent trends in arbitration and litigation outcomes in disputes, if any, with its reinsurers. The Company monitors ratings and evaluates the financial strength of its reinsurers by analyzing their financial statements. In addition, the reinsurance recoverable balance due from each reinsurer is evaluated as part of the overall monitoring process. Recoverability of reinsurance recoverable balances is evaluated based on these analyses. The Company generally secures large reinsurance recoverable balances with various forms of collateral, including secured trusts, funds withheld accounts and irrevocable letters of credit. These reinsurance recoverable balances are stated net of allowances for uncollectible reinsurance, which at December 31, 2011 and 2010, were immaterial.

The Company has secured certain reinsurance recoverable balances with various forms of collateral, including secured trusts, funds withheld accounts and irrevocable letters of credit. The Company had $2.5 billion and $2.9 billion of unsecured unaffiliated reinsurance recoverable balances at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

At December 31, 2011, the Company had $7.1 billion of net unaffiliated ceded reinsurance recoverables. Of this total, $6.5 billion, or 92%, were with the Company’s five largest unaffiliated ceded reinsurers, including $1.9 billion of which were unsecured. At December 31, 2010, the Company had $6.7 billion of net unaffiliated ceded reinsurance recoverables. Of this total, $6.1 billion, or 91%, were with the Company’s five largest unaffiliated ceded reinsurers, including $2.3 billion of which were unsecured.

128

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The amounts in the consolidated statements of operations include the impact of reinsurance. Information regarding the effect of reinsurance was as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Premiums:
Direct premiums	$	2,429	$	1,559	$	1,782
Reinsurance assumed		7		13		14
Reinsurance ceded		(608)		(505)		(484)
Net premiums	$	1,828	$	1,067	$	1,312
Universal life and investment-type product policy fees:
Direct universal life and investment-type product policy fees	$	2,572	$	2,104	$	1,681
Reinsurance assumed		92		120		115
Reinsurance ceded		(708)		(585)		(416)
Net universal life and investment-type product policy fees	$	1,956	$	1,639	$	1,380
Other revenues:
Direct other revenues	$	209	$	200	$	121
Reinsurance ceded		299		303		477
Net other revenues	$	508	$	503	$	598
Policyholder benefits and claims:
Direct policyholder benefits and claims	$	4,277	$	3,708	$	3,314
Reinsurance assumed		20		31		10
Reinsurance ceded		(1,637)		(1,834)		(1,259)
Net policyholder benefits and claims	$	2,660	$	1,905	$	2,065
Interest credited to policyholder account balances:
Direct interest credited to policyholder account balances	$	1,206	$	1,265	$	1,270
Reinsurance assumed		68		64		64
Reinsurance ceded		(85)		(58)		(33)
Net interest credited to policyholder account balances	$	1,189	$	1,271	$	1,301
Other expenses:
Direct other expenses	$	2,715	$	2,158	$	1,158
Reinsurance assumed		48		92		107
Reinsurance ceded		152		122		69
Net other expenses	$	2,915	$	2,372	$	1,334

129

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

The amounts in the consolidated balance sheets include the impact of reinsurance. Information regarding the effect of reinsurance was as follows at:

	December 31, 2011
	Direct		Assumed		Ceded		Total Balance Sheet
	(In millions)
Assets:
Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables	$	686	$	34	$	19,503	$	20,223
Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired		4,635		134		(581)		4,188
Total assets	$	5,321	$	168	$	18,922	$	24,411
Liabilities:
Future policy benefits	$	25,399	$	84	$	—	$	25,483
Other policy-related balances		677		1,515		797		2,989
Other liabilities		1,230		12		4,142		5,384
Total liabilities	$	27,306	$	1,611	$	4,939	$	33,856

	December 31, 2010
	Direct		Assumed		Ceded		Total Balance Sheet
	(In millions)
Assets:
Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables	$	376	$	40	$	16,592	$	17,008
Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired		4,734		158		(501)		4,391
Total assets	$	5,110	$	198	$	16,091	$	21,399
Liabilities:
Future policy benefits	$	23,111	$	87	$	—	$	23,198
Other policy-related balances		674		1,435		543		2,652
Other liabilities		1,082		12		3,409		4,503
Total liabilities	$	24,867	$	1,534	$	3,952	$	30,353

Reinsurance agreements that do not expose the Company to a reasonable possibility of a significant loss from insurance risk are recorded using the deposit method of accounting. The deposit assets on reinsurance were $4.7 billion at both December 31, 2011 and 2010. There were no deposit liabilities on reinsurance at both December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Related Party Reinsurance Transactions

The Company has reinsurance agreements with certain MetLife subsidiaries, including MLIC, MetLife Reinsurance Company of South Carolina, Exeter, General American Life Insurance Company, MetLife Investors Insurance Company and MetLife Reinsurance Company of Vermont, all of which are related parties.

130

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Information regarding the effect of affiliated reinsurance included in the consolidated statements of operations was as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
	(In millions)
Premiums:
Reinsurance assumed	$	7		$	13		$	14
Reinsurance ceded		(286	)		(191	)		(166	)
Net premiums	$	(279)		$	(178)		$	(152)
Universal life and investment-type product policy fees:
Reinsurance assumed	$	92		$	120		$	115
Reinsurance ceded		(400	)		(308	)		(168	)
Net universal life and investment-type product policy fees	$	(308)		$	(188)		$	(53)
Other revenues:
Reinsurance assumed	$	—		$	—		$	—
Reinsurance ceded		299			303			477
Net other revenues	$	299		$	303		$	477
Policyholder benefits and claims:
Reinsurance assumed	$	18		$	29		$	8
Reinsurance ceded		(484	)		(343	)		(239	)
Net policyholder benefits and claims	$	(466)		$	(314)		$	(231)
Interest credited to policyholder account balances:
Reinsurance assumed	$	68		$	64		$	64
Reinsurance ceded		(84	)		(59	)		(33	)
Net interest credited to policyholder account balances	$	(16)		$	5		$	31
Other expenses:
Reinsurance assumed	$	48		$	93		$	107
Reinsurance ceded		204			153			103
Net other expenses	$	252		$	246		$	210

131

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Information regarding the effect of affiliated reinsurance included in the consolidated balance sheets was as follows at:

	December 31,
	2011				2010
	Assumed		Ceded		Assumed		Ceded
	(In millions)
Assets:
Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables	$	34	$	12,345	$	40	$	9,826
Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired		134		(585)		158		(486)
Total assets	$	168	$	11,760	$	198	$	9,340
Liabilities:
Future policy benefits	$	44	$	—	$	41	$	—
Other policy-related balances		1,515		758		1,435		508
Other liabilities		10		3,903		12		3,200
Total liabilities	$	1,569	$	4,661	$	1,488	$	3,708

The Company ceded risks to affiliates related to guaranteed minimum benefit guarantees written directly by the Company. These ceded reinsurance agreements contain embedded derivatives and changes in their fair value are also included within net derivative gains (losses). The embedded derivatives associated with the cessions are included within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables and were assets of $2.8 billion and $936 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, net derivative gains (losses) associated with the embedded derivatives included $1.6 billion, ($2) million, and ($1.5) billion, respectively.

MLI-USA cedes two blocks of business to an affiliate on a 90% coinsurance with funds withheld basis. Certain contractual features of this agreement qualify as embedded derivatives, which are separately accounted for at estimated fair value on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The embedded derivative related to the funds withheld associated with this reinsurance agreement is included within other liabilities and increased the funds withheld balance by $416 million and $5 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Net derivative gains (losses) associated with the embedded derivatives were ($411) million, ($17) million and ($16) million at December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The reinsurance agreement also includes an experience refund provision, whereby some or all of the profits on the underlying reinsurance agreement are returned to MLI-USA from the affiliated reinsurer during the first several years of the reinsurance agreement. The experience refund reduced the funds withheld by MLI-USA from the affiliated reinsurer by $337 million and $304 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and is considered unearned revenue, amortized over the life of the contract using the same assumptions as used for the DAC associated with the underlying policies. Amortization and interest of the unearned revenue associated with the experience refund was $91 million, $81 million and $36 million at December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and is included in premiums and universal life and investment-type product policy fees in the consolidated statements of operations. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, unearned revenue related to the experience refund was $806 million and $560 million, respectively, and is included in other policy-related balances in the consolidated balance sheets.

The Company has secured certain reinsurance recoverable balances with various forms of collateral, including secured trusts, funds withheld accounts and irrevocable letters of credit. The Company had $4.8 billion and $4.4 billion of unsecured affiliated reinsurance recoverable balances at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

132

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Affiliated reinsurance agreements that do not expose the Company to a reasonable possibility of a significant loss from insurance risk are recorded using the deposit method of accounting. The deposit assets on affiliated reinsurance were $4.6 billion at both December 31, 2011 and 2010. There were no deposit liabilities on affiliated reinsurance at both December 31, 2011 and 2010.

9. Debt

Long-term debt outstanding was as follows:

	Interest   Rates			Maturity	December 31,
					2011		2010
					(In millions)
Surplus notes — affiliated		8.595	%	2038	$	750	$	750
Long-term debt — unaffiliated		7.028	%	2030		42		45
Total long-term debt (1)					$	792	$	795

(1) Excludes $3.1 billion and $6.8 billion of long-term debt relating to CSEs at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. See Note 2.

On December 23, 2010, Greater Sandhill I, LLC (“Greater Sandhill”), an affiliate of MLI-USA, issued to a third party long-term notes for $45 million maturing in 2030 with an interest rate of 7.028%. The notes were issued in exchange for certain investments, which are included in other invested assets. During the year ended December 31, 2011, Greater Sandhill repaid $3 million of the long-term notes.

In December 2009, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut renewed the $200 million surplus note to MetLife Credit Corporation, originally issued in December 2007, with an interest rate of six-month LIBOR plus 1.80%. On December 29, 2010, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut repaid the $200 million surplus note to MetLife Credit Corporation.

The aggregate maturities of long-term debt at December 31, 2011 are $1 million in each of 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, and $787 million thereafter.

Interest expense related to the Company’s indebtedness included in other expenses was $67 million, $70 million and $71 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Payments of interest and principal on the outstanding surplus notes may be made only with the prior approval of the insurance department of the state of domicile.

133

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

10.  Income Tax

The provision for income tax was as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Current:
Federal	$	(157)	$	55	$	24
State and local		—		—		1
Foreign		(5)		(4)		(4)
Subtotal		(162)		51		21
Deferred:
Federal		643		257		(419)
Foreign		42		(5)		(13)
Subtotal		685		252		(432)
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)	$	523	$	303	$	(411)

The reconciliation of the income tax provision at the U.S. statutory rate to the provision for income tax as reported was as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Tax provision at U.S. statutory rate	$	615	$	358	$	(330)
Tax effect of:
Tax-exempt investment income		(71)		(67)		(69)
Prior year tax		(9)		8		(17)
Tax credits		(11)		(6)		—
Foreign tax rate differential		(1)		5		5
Change in valuation allowance		(2)		4		—
Other, net		2		1		—
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)	$	523	$	303	$	(411)

134

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Deferred income tax represents the tax effect of the differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Net deferred income tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following at:

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Deferred income tax assets:
Policyholder liabilities and receivables	$	880	$	1,298
Net operating loss carryforwards		124		99
Operating lease reserves		—		2
Capital loss carryforwards		123		359
Investments, including derivatives		119		297
Tax credit carryforwards		160		167
Other		41		20
		1,447		2,242
Less: Valuation allowance		2		4
		1,445		2,238
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Net unrealized investment gains		1,021		168
DAC and VOBA		1,350		1,468
Other		9		1
		2,380		1,637
Net deferred income tax asset (liability)	$	(935)	$	601

The following table sets forth the domestic, state, and foreign net operating and capital loss carryforwards for tax purposes at December 31, 2011:

	Net Operating Loss Carryforwards			Capital Loss Carryforwards
	Amount		Expiration	Amount		Expiration
	(In millions)			(In millions)
Domestic	$	60	Beginning in 2025	$	350	Beginning in 2013
State	$	22	Beginning in 2012	$	—	N/A
Foreign	$	413	Indefinite	$	—	N/A

Tax credit carryforwards of $160 million at December 31, 2011 will expire beginning in 2016.

The Company has recorded a valuation allowance related to tax benefits of certain state net operating losses. The valuation allowance reflects management’s assessment, based on available information, that it is more likely than not that the deferred income tax asset for certain state net operating losses will not be realized. The tax benefit will be recognized when management believes that it is more likely than not that these deferred income tax assets are realizable. In 2011, the Company recorded an overall decrease to the deferred tax valuation allowance of $2 million.

Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) rules, the Company was excluded from MetLife’s life/non-life consolidated federal tax return for the five years subsequent to MetLife’s July 2005 acquisition of the Company. In 2011, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and its subsidiaries joined the consolidated return and

135

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

became a party to the MetLife tax sharing agreement. Prior to 2011, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut filed a consolidated tax return with its includable subsidiaries. Non-includable subsidiaries filed either separate individual corporate tax returns or separate consolidated tax returns.

The Company files income tax returns with the U.S. federal government and various state and local jurisdictions, as well as foreign jurisdictions. The Company is under continuous examination by the IRS and other tax authorities in jurisdictions in which the Company has significant business operations. The income tax years under examination vary by jurisdiction. With a few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2005 and is no longer subject to foreign income tax examinations for the years prior to 2006. The IRS exam of the current audit cycle, years 2005 and 2006, began in April 2010.

It is not expected that there will be a material change in the Company’s liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits was as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
	(In millions)
Balance at January 1,	$	38		$	44		$	48
Additions for tax positions of prior years		—			1			2
Reductions for tax positions of prior years		(3	)		—			—
Additions for tax positions of current year		2			—			—
Reductions for tax positions of current year		(8	)		(7	)		(6	)
Balance at December 31,	$	29		$	38		$	44
Unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized would impact the effective rate	$	(3	)	$	—		$	—

The Company classifies interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense, included within other expenses, while penalties are included in income tax expense.

Interest and penalties were as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Interest and penalties recognized in the consolidated statements of operations	$	—	$	5	$	—

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Interest and penalties included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets	$	9	$	9

The U.S. Treasury Department and the IRS have indicated that they intend to address through regulations the methodology to be followed in determining the dividends received deduction (“DRD”), related to variable life insurance and annuity contracts. The DRD reduces the amount of dividend income subject to tax and is a significant component of the difference between the actual tax expense and expected amount determined using the federal statutory tax rate of 35%. Any regulations that the IRS ultimately proposes for issuance in this area will be subject to public notice and comment, at which time insurance companies and other interested parties will

136

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

have the opportunity to raise legal and practical questions about the content, scope and application of such regulations. As a result, the ultimate timing and substance of any such regulations are unknown at this time. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $73 million and $67 million, respectively, related to the separate account DRD. The 2011 benefit included a benefit of $3 million related to a true-up of the 2010 tax return. The 2010 benefit included an expense of $28 million related to a true-up of the 2009 tax return.

11. Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees

Litigation

The Company is a defendant in a number of litigation matters. In some of the matters, large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive and treble damages, are sought. Modern pleading practice in the U.S. permits considerable variation in the assertion of monetary damages or other relief. Jurisdictions may permit claimants not to specify the monetary damages sought or may permit claimants to state only that the amount sought is sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the trial court. In addition, jurisdictions may permit plaintiffs to allege monetary damages in amounts well exceeding reasonably possible verdicts in the jurisdiction for similar matters. This variability in pleadings, together with the actual experience of the Company in litigating or resolving through settlement numerous claims over an extended period of time, demonstrates to management that the monetary relief which may be specified in a lawsuit or claim bears little relevance to its merits or disposition value.

Due to the vagaries of litigation, the outcome of a litigation matter and the amount or range of potential loss at particular points in time may normally be difficult to ascertain. Uncertainties can include how fact finders will evaluate documentary evidence and the credibility and effectiveness of witness testimony, and how trial and appellate courts will apply the law in the context of the pleadings or evidence presented, whether by motion practice, or at trial or on appeal. Disposition valuations are also subject to the uncertainty of how opposing parties and their counsel will themselves view the relevant evidence and applicable law.

The Company establishes liabilities for litigation and regulatory loss contingencies when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Liabilities have been established for some of the matters below. It is possible that some of the matters could require the Company to pay damages or make other expenditures or establish accruals in amounts that could not be estimated at December 31, 2011.

Matters as to Which an Estimate Can Be Made

For some of the matters discussed below, the Company is able to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss. For such matters where a loss is believed to be reasonably possible, but not probable, no accrual has been made. As of December 31, 2011, the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses in excess of amounts accrued for these matters was not material for the Company.

Matters as to Which an Estimate Cannot Be Made

For other matters disclosed below, the Company is not currently able to estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss. The Company is often unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss until developments in such matters have provided sufficient information to support an assessment of the range of possible loss, such as quantification of a damage demand from plaintiffs, discovery from other parties and investigation of factual allegations, rulings by the court on motions or appeals, analysis by experts, and the progress of settlement negotiations. On a quarterly and annual basis, the Company reviews relevant information with respect to litigation contingencies and updates its accruals, disclosures and estimates of reasonably possible losses or ranges of loss based on such reviews.

137

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Sales Practices Claims

Over the past several years, the Company has faced claims, including class action lawsuits, alleging improper marketing or sales of individual life insurance policies, annuities, mutual funds or other products. Some of the current cases seek substantial damages, including punitive and treble damages and attorneys’ fees. The Company continues to vigorously defend against the claims in these matters. The Company believes adequate provision has been made in its consolidated financial statements for all probable and reasonably estimable losses for sales practices matters.

Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut are engaged in an arbitration proceeding to determine whether MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut is owed money from Connecticut General Life Insurance Company or is required to refund several million dollars it collected and/or should stop submitting certain claims under reinsurance contracts in which Connecticut General Life Insurance Company reinsured death benefits payable under certain MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut annuities.

A former Tower Square financial services representative is alleged to have misappropriated funds from customers. The Illinois Securities Division, the U.S. Postal Inspector, the Internal Revenue Service, FINRA and the U.S. Attorney’s Office have conducted inquiries. Tower Square has made remediation to all the affected customers. The Illinois Securities Division has issued a Statement of Violations to Tower Square, and Tower Square is conducting discussions with the Illinois Securities Division.

Unclaimed Property Inquiries

More than 30 U.S. jurisdictions are auditing MetLife, Inc. and certain of its affiliates, including MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, for compliance with unclaimed property laws. Additionally, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and certain of its affiliates have received subpoenas and other regulatory inquiries from certain regulators and other officials relating to claims-payment practices and compliance with unclaimed property laws. An examination of these practices by the Illinois Department of Insurance has been converted into a multistate targeted market conduct exam. On July 5, 2011, the New York Insurance Department issued a letter requiring life insurers doing business in New York to use data available on the U.S. Social Security Administration’s Death Master File or a similar database to identify instances where death benefits under life insurance policies, annuities, and retained asset accounts are payable, to locate and pay beneficiaries under such contracts, and to report the results of the use of the data. It is possible that other jurisdictions may pursue similar investigations or inquiries, may join the multistate market conduct exam, or issue directives similar to the New York Insurance Department’s letter. It is possible that the audits, market conduct exam, and related activity may result in additional payments to beneficiaries, additional escheatment of funds deemed abandoned under state laws, administrative penalties, interest, and changes to the Company’s procedures for the identification and escheatment of abandoned property. The Company estimates that the reasonably possible amount of such additional payments in excess of amounts accrued is not material to the Company.

Summary

Various litigation, claims and assessments against the Company, in addition to those discussed previously and those otherwise provided for in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, have arisen in the course of the Company’s business, including, but not limited to, in connection with its activities as an insurer, employer, investor, investment advisor and taxpayer. Further, state insurance regulatory authorities and other federal and state authorities regularly make inquiries and conduct investigations concerning the Company’s compliance with applicable insurance and other laws and regulations.

138

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

It is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of all pending investigations and legal proceedings. In some of the matters referred to previously, large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive and treble damages, are sought. Although, in light of these considerations it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain cases could have a material effect upon the Company’s financial position, based on information currently known by the Company’s management, in its opinion, the outcomes of such pending investigations and legal proceedings are not likely to have such an effect. However, given the large and/or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters and the inherent unpredictability of litigation, it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated net income or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.

Insolvency Assessments

Most of the jurisdictions in which the Company is admitted to transact business require insurers doing business within the jurisdiction to participate in guaranty associations, which are organized to pay contractual benefits owed pursuant to insurance policies issued by impaired, insolvent or failed insurers. These associations levy assessments, up to prescribed limits, on all member insurers in a particular state on the basis of the proportionate share of the premiums written by member insurers in the lines of business in which the impaired, insolvent or failed insurer engaged. Some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through full or partial premium tax offsets.

Assets and liabilities held for insolvency assessments were as follows:

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	(In millions)
Other Assets:
Premium tax offset for future undiscounted assessments	$	19	$	8
Premium tax offsets currently available for paid assessments		2		1
	$	21	$	9
Other Liabilities:
Insolvency assessments	$	39	$	13

On September 1, 2011, the New York State Department of Financial Services filed a liquidation plan for Executive Life Insurance Company of New York (“ELNY”), which had been under rehabilitation by the Liquidation Bureau since 1991. The plan will involve the satisfaction of insurers’ financial obligations under a number of state life and health insurance guaranty associations and also contemplates that additional industry support for certain ELNY policyholders will be provided. The Company recorded a net charge of $11 million, after tax, related to ELNY.

Commitments

Commitments to Fund Partnership Investments

The Company makes commitments to fund partnership investments in the normal course of business. The amounts of these unfunded commitments were $1.2 billion at both December 31, 2011 and 2010. The Company anticipates that these amounts will be invested in partnerships over the next five years.

139

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Mortgage Loan Commitments

The Company commits to lend funds under mortgage loan commitments. The amounts of these mortgage loan commitments were $167 million and $270 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Commitments to Fund Bank Credit Facilities and Private Corporate Bond Investments

The Company commits to lend funds under bank credit facilities and private corporate bond investments. The amounts of these unfunded commitments were $248 million and $315 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Other Commitments

The Company has entered into collateral arrangements with affiliates, which require the transfer of collateral in connection with secured demand notes. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had agreed to fund up to $90 million and $114 million, respectively, of cash upon the request by these affiliates and had transferred collateral consisting of various securities with a fair market value of $109 million and $144 million, respectively, to custody accounts to secure the notes. Each of these affiliates is permitted by contract to sell or repledge this collateral.

Guarantees

In the normal course of its business, the Company has provided certain indemnities, guarantees and commitments to third parties pursuant to which it may be required to make payments now or in the future. In the context of acquisition, disposition, investment and other transactions, the Company has provided indemnities and guarantees, including those related to tax, environmental and other specific liabilities, and other indemnities and guarantees that are triggered by, among other things, breaches of representations, warranties or covenants provided by the Company. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Company provides indemnifications to counterparties in contracts with triggers similar to the foregoing, as well as for certain other liabilities, such as third-party lawsuits. These obligations are often subject to time limitations that vary in duration, including contractual limitations and those that arise by operation of law, such as applicable statutes of limitation. In some cases, the maximum potential obligation under the indemnities and guarantees is subject to a contractual limitation, such as in the case of MetLife International Insurance Company, Ltd. (“MLII”), a former affiliate, discussed below, while in other cases such limitations are not specified or applicable. Since certain of these obligations are not subject to limitations, the Company does not believe that it is possible to determine the maximum potential amount that could become due under these guarantees in the future. Management believes that it is unlikely the Company will have to make any material payments under these indemnities, guarantees, or commitments.

The Company has provided a guarantee on behalf of MLII that is triggered if MLII cannot pay claims because of insolvency, liquidation or rehabilitation. Life insurance coverage in-force, representing the maximum potential obligation under this guarantee, was $272 million and $297 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company does not hold any collateral related to this guarantee, but has a recorded liability of $1 million that was based on the total account value of the guaranteed policies plus the amounts retained per policy at both December 31, 2011 and 2010. The remainder of the risk was ceded to external reinsurers.

In addition, the Company indemnifies its directors and officers as provided in its charters and by-laws. Also, the Company indemnifies its agents for liabilities incurred as a result of their representation of the Company’s interests. Since these indemnities are generally not subject to limitation with respect to duration or amount, the Company does not believe that it is possible to determine the maximum potential amount that could become due under these indemnities in the future.

140

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

12. Equity

Return of Capital

During the year ended December 31, 2011, Sino-US MetLife Insurance Company Limited (“Sino”), an insurance underwriting joint venture of the Company accounted for under the equity method, merged with United MetLife Insurance Company Limited (“United”), another insurance underwriting joint venture of an affiliate of the Company. MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut’s ownership interest in the merged entity, Sino-US United MetLife Insurance Company Limited (“Sino-United”) was determined based on its contributed capital and share of undistributed earnings of Sino compared to the contributed capital and undistributed earnings of all other investees of Sino and United. Since both of the joint ventures were under common ownership both prior to and subsequent to the merger, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut’s investment in Sino-United is based on the carrying value of its investment in Sino. Pursuant to the merger, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut entered into an agreement to pay the affiliate an amount based on the relative fair values of their respective investments in Sino-United. Accordingly, upon completion of the estimation of fair value, $47 million, representing a return of capital, was paid during the year ended December 31, 2011. MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut’s investment in Sino-United is accounted for under the equity method and is included in other invested assets.

Common Stock

The Company has 40,000,000 authorized shares of common stock, 34,595,317 shares of which are outstanding at both December 31, 2011 and 2010. Of such outstanding shares, 30,000,000 shares are owned directly by MetLife and the remaining shares are owned by MetLife Investors Group, Inc.

Statutory Equity and Income

Each insurance company’s state of domicile imposes minimum risk-based capital (“RBC”) requirements that were developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”). The formulas for determining the amount of RBC specify various weighting factors that are applied to financial balances or various levels of activity based on the perceived degree of risk. Regulatory compliance is determined by a ratio of total adjusted capital, as defined by the NAIC, to authorized control level RBC, as defined by the NAIC. Companies below specific trigger points or ratios are classified within certain levels, each of which requires specified corrective action. MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and MLI-USA each exceeded the minimum RBC requirements for all periods presented herein.

The NAIC has adopted the Codification of Statutory Accounting Principles (“Statutory Codification”). Statutory Codification is intended to standardize regulatory accounting and reporting to state insurance departments. However, statutory accounting principles continue to be established by individual state laws and permitted practices. Modifications by the various state insurance departments may impact the effect of Statutory Codification on the statutory capital and surplus of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and MLI-USA.

Statutory accounting principles differ from GAAP primarily by charging policy acquisition costs to expense as incurred, establishing future policy benefit liabilities using different actuarial assumptions, reporting surplus notes as surplus instead of debt, reporting of reinsurance agreements and valuing securities on a different basis.

In addition, certain assets are not admitted under statutory accounting principles and are charged directly to surplus. The most significant assets not admitted by the Company are net deferred income tax assets resulting from temporary differences between statutory accounting principles basis and tax basis not expected to reverse and become recoverable within three years.

141

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Statutory net income (unaudited) of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, a Connecticut domiciled insurer, was $46 million, $668 million and $81 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Statutory capital and surplus (unaudited), as filed with the Connecticut Insurance Department, was $5.1 billion at both December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Statutory net income (loss) (unaudited) of MLI-USA, a Delaware domiciled insurer, was $178 million, $2 million and ($24) million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Statutory capital and surplus (unaudited), as filed with the Delaware Insurance Department, was $1.7 billion and $1.5 billion at December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Dividend Restrictions

Under Connecticut State Insurance Law, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut is permitted, without prior insurance regulatory clearance, to pay stockholder dividends to its stockholders as long as the amount of such dividends, when aggregated with all other dividends in the preceding 12 months, does not exceed the greater of: (i) 10% of its surplus to policyholders as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year; or (ii) its statutory net gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year. MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut will be permitted to pay a dividend in excess of the greater of such two amounts only if it files notice of its declaration of such a dividend and the amount thereof with the Connecticut Commissioner of Insurance (the “Connecticut Commissioner”) and the Connecticut Commissioner does not disapprove the payment within 30 days after notice. In addition, any dividend that exceeds earned surplus (unassigned funds, reduced by 25% of unrealized appreciation in value or revaluation of assets or unrealized profits on investments) as of the last filed annual statutory statement requires insurance regulatory approval. Under Connecticut State Insurance Law, the Connecticut Commissioner has broad discretion in determining whether the financial condition of a stock life insurance company would support the payment of such dividends to its shareholders. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut paid a dividend of $517 million and $330 million, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2009, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut did not pay a dividend. The maximum amount of dividends which MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut may pay in 2012 without prior regulatory approval is $504 million.

Under Delaware State Insurance Law, MLI-USA is permitted, without prior insurance regulatory clearance, to pay a stockholder dividend to MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut as long as the amount of the dividend when aggregated with all other dividends in the preceding 12 months does not exceed the greater of: (i) 10% of its surplus to policyholders as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year; or (ii) its statutory net gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year (excluding realized capital gains). MLI-USA will be permitted to pay a dividend to MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut in excess of the greater of such two amounts only if it files notice of the declaration of such a dividend and the amount thereof with the Delaware Commissioner and the Delaware Commissioner either approves the distribution of the dividend or does not disapprove the distribution within 30 days of its filing. In addition, any dividend that exceeds earned surplus (defined as unassigned funds) as of the last filed annual statutory statement requires insurance regulatory approval. Under Delaware State Insurance Law, the Delaware Commissioner has broad discretion in determining whether the financial condition of a stock life insurance company would support the payment of such dividends to its shareholders. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, MLI-USA did not pay dividends. Because MLI-USA’s statutory unassigned funds was negative at December 31, 2011, MLI-USA cannot pay any dividends in 2012 without prior regulatory approval.

142

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table sets forth the balance and changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) including reclassification adjustments required for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 in other comprehensive income (loss) that are included as part of net income for the current year that have been reported as a part of other comprehensive income (loss) in the current or prior year:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Holding gains (losses) on investments arising during the year	$	3,157	$	2,032	$	3,365
Income tax effect of holding gains (losses)		(1,111)		(705)		(1,174)
Reclassification adjustments for recognized holding (gains) losses included in current year income		(58)		(215)		505
Income tax effect of reclassification adjustments		20		74		(176)
Allocation of holding (gains) losses on investments relating to other policyholder amounts		(678)		(305)		(734)
Income tax effect of allocation of holding (gains) losses to other policyholder amounts		238		107		255
Net unrealized investment gains (losses), net of income tax		1,568		988		2,041
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of income tax expense (benefit) of ($2) million, ($1) million and $0		(14)		(16)		45
Other comprehensive income (loss), excluding cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		1,554		972		2,086
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of income tax expense (benefit) of $0, $18 million and ($21) million (see Note 1)		—		34		(39)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax	$	1,554	$	1,006	$	2,047

13. Other Expenses

Information on other expenses was as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Compensation	$	306	$	283	$	148
Commissions		1,418		936		796
Volume-related costs		162		130		308
Affiliated interest costs on ceded reinsurance		271		162		107
Capitalization of DAC		(1,342)		(858)		(703)
Amortization of DAC and VOBA		1,156		770		273
Interest expense on debt and debt issuance costs		389		472		71
Premium taxes, licenses & fees		75		47		45
Professional services		50		38		17
Rent		29		29		3
Other		401		363		269
Total other expenses	$	2,915	$	2,372	$	1,334

143

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

Capitalization of DAC and Amortization of DAC and VOBA

See Note 5 for DAC and VOBA by segment and a rollforward of each including impacts of capitalization and amortization. See Note 1 for information on the retrospective application of the adoption of new accounting guidance related to DAC.

Interest Expense on Debt and Debt Issuance Costs

Interest expense on debt and debt issuance costs includes interest expense on debt (see Note 9) and interest expense related to CSEs (see Note 2).

Affiliated Expenses

Commissions, capitalization of DAC and amortization of DAC include the impact of affiliated reinsurance transactions. See Notes 8, 9 and 15 for discussion of affiliated expenses included in the table above.

14. Business Segment Information

As announced in November 2011, MetLife reorganized its business into three broad geographic regions. As a result, in the first quarter of 2012, the Company reorganized into two segments: Retail Products and Corporate Benefit Funding. In addition, the Company reports certain of its results of operations in Corporate & Other. Prior period results have been revised in connection with this reorganization.

The Retail Products segment offers a broad range of protection products and a variety of annuities primarily to individuals, and is organized into two businesses: Annuities and Life. Annuities include a variety of variable and fixed annuities which provide for both asset accumulation and asset distribution needs. Life insurance products include variable life, universal life, term life and whole life products, including participating business.

The Corporate Benefit Funding segment includes an array of annuity and investment products, including guaranteed interest products and other stable value products, income annuities, and separate account contracts for the investment management of defined benefit and defined contribution plan assets.

Corporate & Other contains the excess capital not allocated to the segments, run-off business, the Company’s ancillary international operations and non-medical health business, interest expense related to the majority of the Company’s outstanding debt, expenses associated with certain legal proceedings and income tax audit issues. Corporate & Other also includes the elimination of intersegment amounts.

Operating earnings is the measure of segment profit or loss the Company uses to evaluate segment performance and allocate resources. Consistent with GAAP accounting guidance for segment reporting, operating earnings is the Company’s measure of segment performance and is reported below. Operating earnings should not be viewed as a substitute for GAAP net income (loss). The Company believes the presentation of operating earnings as the Company measures it for management purposes enhances the understanding of its performance by highlighting the results of operations and the underlying profitability drivers of the business.

Operating earnings is defined as operating revenues less operating expenses, both net of income tax.

Operating revenues excludes net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses). The following additional adjustments are made to GAAP revenues, in the line items indicated, in calculating operating revenues:

• Universal life and investment-type product policy fees excludes the amortization of unearned revenue related to net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses) and certain variable annuity GMIB fees (“GMIB Fees”); and

144

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

• Net investment income: (i) includes amounts for scheduled periodic settlement payments and amortization of premium on derivatives that are hedges of investments but do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, (ii) excludes certain amounts related to contractholder-directed unit-linked investments, and (iii) excludes certain amounts related to securitization entities that are VIEs consolidated under GAAP.

The following adjustments are made to GAAP expenses, in the line items indicated, in calculating operating expenses:

• Policyholder benefits and claims excludes: (i) amounts associated with periodic crediting rate adjustments based on the total return of a contractually referenced pool of assets, (ii) benefits and hedging costs related to GMIBs (“GMIB Costs”), and (iii) market value adjustments associated with surrenders or terminations of contracts (“Market Value Adjustments”);

• Interest credited to policyholder account balances includes adjustments for scheduled periodic settlement payments and amortization of premium on derivatives that are hedges of PABs but do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and excludes amounts related to net investment income earned on contractholder-directed unit-linked investments;

• Amortization of DAC and VOBA excludes amounts related to: (i) net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses), (ii) GMIB Fees and GMIB Costs, and (iii) Market Value Adjustments;

• Interest expense on debt excludes certain amounts related to securitization entities that are VIEs consolidated under GAAP; and

• Other expenses excludes costs related to implementation of new insurance regulatory requirements and business combinations.

In 2011, management modified its definition of operating earnings to exclude impacts related to certain variable annuity guarantees and Market Value Adjustments to better conform to the way it manages and assesses its business. Accordingly, such results are no longer reported in operating earnings. Consequently, prior years’ results for Retail Products and total consolidated operating earnings have been reduced by $28 million, net of $15 million of income tax, and $47 million, net of $25 million of income tax, for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Set forth in the tables below is certain financial information with respect to the Company’s segments, as well as Corporate & Other, for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 and at December 31, 2011 and 2010. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those of the Company, except for operating earnings adjustments as defined above, the method of capital allocation and the accounting for gains (losses) from intercompany sales, which are eliminated in consolidation.

Economic capital is an internally developed risk capital model, the purpose of which is to measure the risk in the business and to provide a basis upon which capital is deployed. The economic capital model accounts for the unique and specific nature of the risks inherent in MetLife’s business.

Effective January 1, 2011, MetLife updated its economic capital model to align segment allocated equity with emerging standards and consistent risk principles. Such changes to MetLife’s economic capital model are applied prospectively. Segment net investment income is also credited or charged based on the level of allocated equity; however, changes in allocated equity do not impact the Company’s consolidated net investment income, operating earnings or net income.

145

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

	Operating Earnings								Adjustments		Total Consolidated
Year Ended December 31, 2011	Retail Products		Corporate Benefit Funding		Corporate & Other		Total
	(In millions)
Revenues
Premiums	$	704	$	1,071	$	53	$	1,828	$	—	$	1,828
Universal life and investment-type product policy fees		1,764		34		36		1,834		122		1,956
Net investment income		1,416		1,175		188		2,779		295		3,074
Other revenues		502		5		1		508		—		508
Net investment gains (losses)		—		—		—		—		35		35
Net derivative gains (losses)		—		—		—		—		1,119		1,119
Total revenues		4,386		2,285		278		6,949		1,571		8,520
Expenses
Policyholder benefits and claims		889		1,598		53		2,540		120		2,660
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		988		180		—		1,168		21		1,189
Capitalization of DAC		(1,278)		(7)		(57)		(1,342)		—		(1,342)
Amortization of DAC and VOBA		788		4		6		798		358		1,156
Interest expense on debt		—		—		67		67		322		389
Other expenses		2,482		42		164		2,688		24		2,712
Total expenses		3,869		1,817		233		5,919		845		6,764
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)		181		164		(68)		277		246		523
Operating earnings	$	336	$	304	$	113		753
Adjustments to:
Total revenues								1,571
Total expenses								(845)
Provision for income tax (expense) benefit								(246)
Net income (loss)							$	1,233			$	1,233
At December 31, 2011:	Retail Products		Corporate Benefit Funding		Corporate & Other		Total
	(In millions)
Total assets	$	120,633	$	30,836	$	19,595	$	171,064
Separate account assets	$	70,679	$	1,880	$	—	$	72,559
Separate account liabilities	$	70,679	$	1,880	$	—	$	72,559

146

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

	Operating Earnings
Year Ended December 31, 2010	Retail Products			Corporate Benefit Funding			Corporate & Other			Total			Adjustments		Total Consolidated
	(In millions)
Revenues
Premiums	$	417		$	643		$	7		$	1,067		$	—	$	1,067
Universal life and investment-type product policy fees		1,509			29			15			1,553			86		1,639
Net investment income		1,418			1,102			210			2,730			423		3,153
Other revenues		454			6			43			503			—		503
Net investment gains (losses)		—			—			—			—			150		150
Net derivative gains (losses)		—			—			—			—			58		58
Total revenues		3,798			1,780			275			5,853			717		6,570
Expenses
Policyholder benefits and claims		659			1,159			12			1,830			75		1,905
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		954			193			96			1,243			28		1,271
Capitalization of DAC		(800	)		(4	)		(54	)		(858	)		—		(858	)
Amortization of DAC and VOBA		686			2			10			698			72		770
Interest expense on debt		—			—			70			70			402		472
Other expenses		1,828			36			124			1,988			—		1,988
Total expenses		3,327			1,386			258			4,971			577		5,548
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)		165			139			(50	)		254			49		303
Operating earnings	$	306		$	255		$	67			628
Adjustments to:
Total revenues											717
Total expenses											(577	)
Provision for income tax (expense) benefit											(49	)
Net income (loss)										$	719				$	719
At December 31, 2010:	Retail Products			Corporate Benefit Funding			Corporate & Other			Total
	(In millions)
Total assets	$	103,263		$	30,491		$	20,659		$	154,413
Separate account assets	$	59,994		$	1,625		$	—		$	61,619
Separate account liabilities	$	59,994		$	1,625		$	—		$	61,619

147

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

	Operating Earnings
Year Ended December 31, 2009	Retail Products			Corporate Benefit Funding			Corporate & Other			Total			Adjustments			Total Consolidated
	(In millions)
Revenues
Premiums	$	455		$	849		$	8		$	1,312		$	—		$	1,312
Universal life and investment-type product policy fees		1,308			29			5			1,342			38			1,380
Net investment income		1,260			1,061			43			2,364			(31	)		2,333
Other revenues		592			6			—			598			—			598
Net investment gains (losses)		—			—			—			—			(835	)		(835	)
Net derivative gains (losses)		—			—			—			—			(1,031	)		(1,031	)
Total revenues		3,615			1,945			56			5,616			(1,859	)		3,757
Expenses
Policyholder benefits and claims		644			1,360			9			2,013			52			2,065
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		984			265			91			1,340			(39	)		1,301
Capitalization of DAC		(671	)		(2	)		(30	)		(703	)		—			(703	)
Amortization of DAC and VOBA		560			3			2			565			(292	)		273
Interest expense on debt		—			2			69			71			—			71
Other expenses		1,574			34			86			1,694			(1	)		1,693
Total expenses		3,091			1,662			227			4,980			(280	)		4,700
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)		184			97			(138	)		143			(554	)		(411	)
Operating earnings	$	340		$	186		$	(33	)		493
Adjustments to:
Total revenues											(1,859	)
Total expenses											280
Provision for income tax (expense) benefit											554
Net income (loss)										$	(532	)				$	(532	)

Substantially all of the Company’s premiums, universal life & investment-type product policy fees and other revenue are derived from life insurance products for each of the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

Net investment income is based upon the actual results of each segment’s specifically identifiable asset portfolio adjusted for allocated equity. Other costs are allocated to each of the segments based upon: (i) a review of the nature of such costs; (ii) time studies analyzing the amount of employee compensation costs incurred by each segment; and (iii) cost estimates included in the Company’s product pricing.

Operating revenues derived from any customer did not exceed 10% of consolidated operating revenues for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009. Operating revenues from U.S. operations were $5.7 billion, $5.1 billion and $4.7 billion for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, which represented 83%, 87% and 84%, respectively, of consolidated operating revenues.

148

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

15. Related Party Transactions

Service Agreements

The Company has entered into various agreements with affiliates for services necessary to conduct its activities. Typical services provided under these agreements include management, policy administrative functions, personnel, investment advice and distribution services. For certain agreements, charges are based on various performance measures or activity-based costing. The bases for such charges are modified and adjusted by management when necessary or appropriate to reflect fairly and equitably the actual incidence of cost incurred by the Company and/or affiliate. The aforementioned expenses and fees incurred with affiliates were comprised of the following:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Compensation	$	259	$	244	$	110
Commissions		992		561		511
Volume-related costs		225		177		279
Professional services		20		16		—
Rent		26		26		—
Other		331		300		200
Total other expenses	$	1,853	$	1,324	$	1,100

Revenues received from affiliates related to these agreements were recorded as follows:

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	(In millions)
Universal life and investment-type product policy fees	$	145	$	114	$	85
Other revenues	$	136	$	101	$	71

The Company had net receivables from affiliates of $93 million and $60 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to the items discussed above. These amounts exclude affiliated reinsurance balances discussed in Note 8. See Notes 2, 8 and 9 for additional related party transactions.

16. Subsequent Events

Litigation

Unclaimed Property Inquiries

More than 30 U.S. jurisdictions are auditing MetLife, Inc. and certain of its affiliates, including MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, for compliance with unclaimed property laws. Additionally, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and certain of its affiliates have received subpoenas and other regulatory inquiries from certain regulators and other officials relating to claims-payment practices and compliance with unclaimed property laws. An examination of these practices by the Illinois Department of Insurance has been converted into a multi-state targeted market conduct exam. On July 5, 2011, the New York Insurance Department issued a letter requiring life insurers doing business in New York to use data available on the U.S. Social Security Administration’s Death Master File or a similar database to identify instances where death benefits under life insurance policies, annuities, and retained asset accounts are payable, to locate and pay beneficiaries under such

149

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued)

contracts, and to report the results of the use of the data. In April 2012, the Company reached agreements with representatives of the U.S. jurisdictions that are conducting the audits referenced above and with the states most directly involved in the targeted market conduct exam referenced above to resolve the audits and the examination. The effectiveness of each agreement is conditioned upon the approval of a specified number of jurisdictions. Pursuant to the settlement to resolve the audits, the Company will, among other things, take specified action to identify liabilities under life insurance, annuity, and retained asset contracts, and, to the extent that it is unable to locate owners of amounts payable, to escheat these amounts with interest at a specified rate to the appropriate states. Pursuant to the settlements, the Company will, among other things, adopt specified procedures for identifying liabilities under life insurance, annuity, and retained asset contracts, for seeking to contact and pay beneficiaries under such liabilities, and for escheating unclaimed property to appropriate states. At least one other jurisdiction is pursuing a similar market conduct exam. It is possible that other jurisdictions may pursue similar exams or audits and that such exams or audits may result in additional payments to beneficiaries, additional escheatment of funds deemed abandoned under state laws, administrative penalties, interest, and/or further changes to the Company’s procedures. The Company is not currently able to estimate these additional possible costs.

Dividend

On May 31, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an extraordinary dividend to its shareholders consisting of all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary, MetLife Europe Limited (“MetLife Europe”). The dividend is expected to occur in 2012. At the dividend effective date, the Company’s stockholders’ equity will be reduced by the carrying amount of MetLife Europe’s assets in excess of its liabilities. The carrying amount of MetLife Europe’s assets in excess of its liabilities was $314 million at December 31, 2011.

150

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Schedule I

Consolidated Summary of Investments —

Other Than Investments in Related Parties

December 31, 2011

(In millions)

Types of Investments	Cost or Amortized Cost (1)		Estimated Fair Value		Amount at Which Shown on Balance Sheet
Fixed maturity securities:
Bonds:
U.S. Treasury and agency securities	$	6,832	$	8,048	$	8,048
Foreign government securities		1,035		1,247		1,247
Public utilities		2,095		2,382		2,382
State and political subdivision securities		1,891		2,055		2,055
All other corporate bonds		21,245		22,830		22,830
Total bonds		33,098		36,562		36,562
Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities		10,481		10,599		10,599
Redeemable preferred stock		636		620		620
Total fixed maturity securities		44,215		47,781		47,781
Other securities		3,690		3,665		3,665
Equity securities:
Non-redeemable preferred stock		147		106		106
Common stock:
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other		148		146		146
Total equity securities		295		252		252
Mortgage loans, net		9,800				9,800
Policy loans		1,203				1,203
Real estate and real estate joint ventures		503				503
Other limited partnership interests		1,696				1,696
Short-term investments		2,578				2,578
Other invested assets		3,354				3,354
Total investments		$            67,334				$            70,832

(1) The Company’s other securities portfolio is mainly comprised of equity securities, including mutual funds, and fixed maturity securities. Cost or amortized cost for fixed maturity securities and mortgage loans represents original cost reduced by repayments, valuation allowances and impairments from other-than-temporary declines in estimated fair value that are charged to earnings and adjusted for amortization of premiums or discounts; for equity securities, cost represents original cost reduced by impairments from other-than-temporary declines in estimated fair value; for real estate, cost represents original cost reduced by impairments and adjusted for valuation allowances and depreciation; for real estate joint ventures and other limited partnership interests cost represents original cost reduced for other-than-temporary impairments or original cost adjusted for equity in earnings and distributions.

151

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Schedule II

Condensed Financial Information

(Parent Company Only)

December 31, 2011 and 2010

(In millions, except share and per share data)

	2011		2010
Condensed Balance Sheets
Assets
Investments:
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value (amortized cost: $31,856 and $33,974, respectively)	$	34,063	$	34,300
Equity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value (cost: $288 and $420, respectively)		244		396
Other securities, at estimated fair value		40		—
Mortgage loans (net of valuation allowances of $37 and $54, respectively)		5,109		4,698
Policy loans		1,101		1,127
Real estate and real estate joint ventures		351		329
Other limited partnership interests		1,141		1,057
Short-term investments, principally at estimated fair value		1,581		1,098
Investment in subsidiaries		5,753		4,233
Loans to subsidiaries		305		—
Other invested assets, principally at estimated fair value		2,095		1,481
Total investments		51,783		48,719
Cash and cash equivalents, principally at estimated fair value		379		1,364
Accrued investment income		358		377
Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables		6,993		6,549
Receivables from subsidiaries		728		665
Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired		1,184		1,966
Current income tax recoverable		66		16
Deferred income tax assets		—		938
Goodwill		885		885
Other assets		155		149
Separate account assets		15,739		19,184
Total assets	$	78,270	$	80,812
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Future policy benefits	$	19,509	$	19,453
Policyholder account balances		24,605		25,837
Other policy-related balances		730		485
Payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions		6,375		6,857
Long-term debt — affiliated		750		750
Current income tax payable		42		—
Other liabilities		817		767
Separate account liabilities		15,739		19,184
Total liabilities		68,567		73,333
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, par value $2.50 per share; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 34,595,317 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010		86		86
Additional paid-in capital		6,673		6,719
Retained earnings		1,173		457
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		1,771		217
Total stockholders’ equity		9,703		7,479
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	78,270	$	80,812

See accompanying notes to the condensed financial information.

152

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Schedule II

Condensed Financial Information — (Continued)

(Parent Company Only)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

(In millions)

	2011			2010			2009
Condensed Statements of Operations
Revenues
Premiums	$	148		$	148		$	141
Universal life and investment-type product policy fees		632			633			631
Net investment income		1,943			2,018			1,895
Equity in earnings from subsidiaries		640			193			(394	)
Other revenues		154			162			328
Net investment gains (losses):
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities		(53	)		(97	)		(534	)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities transferred to other comprehensive income (loss)		(3	)		47			160
Other net investment gains (losses)		70			152			(418	)
Total net investment gains (losses)		14			102			(792	)
Net derivative gains (losses)		241			(67	)		(405	)
Total revenues		3,772			3,189			1,404
Expenses
Policyholder benefits and claims		755			800			801
Interest credited to policyholder account balances		710			691			801
Other expenses		784			744			506
Total expenses		2,249			2,235			2,108
Income (loss) before provision for income tax		1,523			954			(704	)
Provision for income tax expense (benefit)		290			235			(172	)
Net income (loss)	$	1,233		$	719		$	(532	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	2,787		$	1,725		$	1,515

See accompanying notes to the condensed financial information.

153

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Schedule II

Condensed Financial Information — (Continued)

(Parent Company Only)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

(In millions)

	2011			2010				2009
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
Cash flows from operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	886		$	1,129			$	993
Cash flows from investing activities
Sales, maturities and repayments of:
Fixed maturity securities		13,921			13,203				10,125
Equity securities		163			127				129
Mortgage loans		552			279				429
Real estate and real estate joint ventures		12			14				3
Other limited partnership interests		159			92				94
Purchases of:
Fixed maturity securities		(11,658	)		(13,715	)			(9,247	)
Equity securities		(22	)		(38	)			(61	)
Mortgage loans		(946	)		(868	)			(531	)
Real estate and real estate joint ventures		(83	)		(80	)			(19	)
Other limited partnership interests		(214	)		(204	)			(127	)
Cash received in connection with freestanding derivatives		375			93				225
Cash paid in connection with freestanding derivatives		(453	)		(102	)			(434	)
Issuances of loans to affiliates		(305	)		—				—
Net change in policy loans		26			12				12
Net change in short-term investments		(487	)		(169	)			619
Net change in other invested assets		(389	)		(401	)			(941	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		651			(1,757	)			276
Cash flows from financing activities
Policyholder account balances:
Deposits		14,151			20,496				15,236
Withdrawals		(15,754	)		(21,062	)			(17,667	)
Net change in payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions		(482	)		1,295				(1,421	)
Net change in short-term debt		—			—				(300	)
Long-term debt repaid		—			(200	)			—
Financing element on certain derivative instruments		127			(24	)			(53	)
Return of capital		(47	)		—				—
Dividends on common stock		(517	)		(330	)			—
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(2,522	)		175				(4,205	)
Change in cash and cash equivalents		(985	)		(453	)			(2,936	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		1,364			1,817				4,753
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	379		$	1,364			$	1,817
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Net cash paid (received) during the year for:							��
Interest	$	64		$	74			$	73
Income tax	$	(66	)	$	98			$	76

See accompanying notes to the condensed financial information.

154

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Schedule II

Notes to the Condensed Financial Information

(Parent Company Only)

1. Basis of Presentation

The condensed financial information of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (the “Parent Company”) should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and its subsidiaries and the notes thereto. These condensed unconsolidated financial statements reflect the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the Parent Company. Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.

The preparation of these condensed unconsolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to adopt accounting policies and make certain estimates and assumptions. The most important of these estimates and assumptions relate to the fair value measurements, the accounting for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets and the provision for potential losses that may arise from litigation and regulatory proceedings and tax audits, which may affect the amounts reported in the condensed unconsolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Certain amounts in the prior years’ condensed unconsolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the 2011 presentation.

2. Support Agreements

The Parent Company has entered into a net worth maintenance agreement with its indirect subsidiary, MetLife Europe Limited (“MetLife Europe”), an Ireland company. Under the agreement, the Parent Company agreed, without limitation as to amount, to cause MetLife Europe to have capital and surplus equal to the greater of (a) €14 million, or (b) such amount that will be sufficient to provide solvency cover equal to 150% of the minimum solvency cover required by applicable law and regulation, as interpreted and applied by the Irish Financial Services Regulatory Authority or any successor body.

The Parent Company has entered into a net worth maintenance agreement with its indirect subsidiary, MetLife Assurance Limited (“MAL”), a United Kingdom company. Under the agreement, the Parent Company agreed, without limitation as to amount, to cause MAL to have capital and surplus equal to the greater of (a) £50 million, (b) such amount that will be sufficient to provide solvency cover equal to 175% of MAL’s capital resources requirement as defined by applicable law and regulation as required by the Financial Services Authority of the United Kingdom (the “FSA”) or any successor body, or (c) such amount that will be sufficient to provide solvency cover equal to 125% of MAL’s individual capital guidance as defined by applicable law and regulation as required by the FSA or any successor body.

155

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Schedule III

Consolidated Supplementary Insurance Information

December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

(In millions)

Segment	DAC and VOBA		Future Policy Benefits and Other Policy-Related Balances		Policyholder Account Balances		Unearned Revenue (1)
2011
Retail Products	$	4,047	$	7,752	$	30,001	$	184
Corporate Benefit Funding		13		14,042		8,375		2
Corporate & Other		128		6,678		3,699		72
Total	$	4,188	$	28,472	$	42,075	$	258
2010
Retail Products	$	4,303	$	6,589	$	27,580	$	217
Corporate Benefit Funding		9		12,996		9,452		—
Corporate & Other		79		6,265		2,259		45
Total	$	4,391	$	25,850	$	39,291	$	262
2009
Retail Products	$	4,531	$	5,356	$	27,109	$	286
Corporate Benefit Funding		7		12,702		9,393		—
Corporate & Other		37		5,860		940		14
Total	$	4,575	$	23,918	$	37,442	$	300

(1) Amounts are included within the future policy benefits and other policy-related balances.

156

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Schedule III

Consolidated Supplementary Insurance Information — (Continued)

December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

(In millions)

Segment	Premium Revenue and Policy Charges		Net Investment Income		Policyholder Benefits and Claims and Interest Credited to Policyholder Account Balances		Amortization of DAC and VOBA Charged to Other Expenses		Other Operating Expenses (1)		Premiums Written (Excluding Life)
2011
Retail Products	$	2,590	$	1,353	$	1,977	$	1,146	$	1,204	$	—
Corporate Benefit Funding		1,105		1,142		1,763		4		36		—
Corporate & Other		89		579		109		6		519		8
Total	$	3,784	$	3,074	$	3,849	$	1,156	$	1,759	$	8
2010
Retail Products	$	2,012	$	1,374	$	1,658	$	758	$	1,028	$	—
Corporate Benefit Funding		672		1,098		1,341		2		32		—
Corporate & Other		22		681		177		10		542		5
Total	$	2,706	$	3,153	$	3,176	$	770	$	1,602	$	5
2009
Retail Products	$	1,801	$	1,224	$	1,619	$	268	$	903	$	—
Corporate Benefit Funding		878		1,069		1,647		3		34		—
Corporate & Other		13		40		100		2		124		4
Total	$	2,692	$	2,333	$	3,366	$	273	$	1,061	$	4

(1) Includes other expenses, excluding amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs (“DAC”) and value of business acquired (“VOBA”) charged to other expenses.

157

MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut

(A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.)

Schedule IV

Consolidated Reinsurance

December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

(In millions)

	Gross Amount		Ceded		Assumed		Net Amount		% Amount Assumed to Net
2011
Life insurance in-force	$	378,153	$	340,477	$	8,085	$	45,761		17.7 %
Insurance premium
Life insurance	$	2,180	$	366	$	7	$	1,821		0.4 %
Accident and health		249		242		—		7		— %
Total insurance premium	$	2,429	$	608	$	7	$	1,828		0.4 %
2010
Life insurance in-force	$	326,366	$	289,559	$	8,217	$	45,024		18.3 %
Insurance premium
Life insurance	$	1,310	$	263	$	13	$	1,060		1.2 %
Accident and health		249		242		—		7		— %
Total insurance premium	$	1,559	$	505	$	13	$	1,067		1.2 %
2009
Life insurance in-force	$	278,335	$	242,647	$	9,044	$	44,732		20.2 %
Insurance premium
Life insurance	$	1,525	$	235	$	14	$	1,304		1.1 %
Accident and health		257		249		—		8		— %
Total insurance premium	$	1,782	$	484	$	14	$	1,312		1.1 %

For the year ended December 31, 2011, reinsurance ceded and assumed included affiliated transactions for life insurance in-force of $195.2 billion and $8.1 billion, respectively, and life insurance premiums of $286 million and $7 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2010, reinsurance ceded and assumed included affiliated transactions for life insurance in-force of $156.6 billion and $8.2 billion, respectively, and life insurance premiums of $191 million and $13 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2009, reinsurance ceded and assumed included affiliated transactions for life insurance in-force of $120.5 billion and $9.0 billion, respectively, and life insurance premiums of $166 million and $14 million, respectively.

158

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1) Financial Statements

The financial statements are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

The financial statement schedules are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Schedules.

(3) Exhibits

The exhibits are listed in the Exhibit Index which begins on page E-1.

159