Rockford 10-Q 2005 Q2 Quarterly report

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

RQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005

Commission File Number 000-30138

ROCKFORD CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

ARIZONA
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization) 86-0394353
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification
No.)

600 South Rockford Drive
Tempe, Arizona
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices) 85281
(Zip Code)

(480) 967-3565
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YesR          No£

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)

Yes£          NoR

Indicate the number of shares of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date:

     As of July 28, 2005, there were 9,241,624 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value per share, outstanding, which is the only class of common stock of the Company registered under Section 12(g) of the Securities Act of 1933.

ROCKFORD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Certifications

 Exhibit 31.1

 Exhibit 31.2

 Exhibit 32

Forward-Looking Statements

     We make forward-looking statements in this report including, without limitation, statements concerning the future of our industry, product development, business strategy, continued acceptance and growth of our products, dependence on significant customers and suppliers, and the adequacy of our available cash resources. Statements may contain projections of results of operations or of financial condition. These statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “continue” or other similar words.

     Forward-looking statements are subject to many risks and uncertainties. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as at the date on which they are made. Actual results may differ materially from those described in these forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligation or undertaking to update these forward-looking statements to reflect changes in our expectations or changes in events, conditions, or circumstances on which our expectations are based.

     When considering our forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements identified in this report, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 2004, filed with the SEC on April 15, 2005, and in Exhibit 99.9 to our Annual Report, “Risk Factors That May Affect Rockford’s Operating Results, Business Prospects and Stock Price.” The risk factors noted throughout this report and our Annual Report, particularly in the discussion in Exhibit 99.9 to our Annual Report, and other risk factors that we have not anticipated or discussed, could cause our actual results to differ significantly from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

ROCKFORD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2005			2004
	(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—		$	—
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $3,115 and $3,504 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively		29,412			33,195
Inventories		25,914			34,005
Income taxes receivable		901			940
Prepaid expenses and other		3,093			2,953
Total current assets		59,320			71,093
Property and equipment, net		4,785			6,407
Other assets		2,626			2,853
Total assets	$	66,731		$	80,353
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	8,878		$	15,594
Accrued salaries and incentives		1,972			1,438
Accrued warranty		3,030			2,902
Other accrued expenses		5,559			7,693
Current portion of long-term debt		13,631			18,204
Total current liabilities		33,070			45,831
Notes payable, less unaccreted discount of $473 and $563 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively		12,027			11,937
Total liabilities		45,097			57,768
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value – Authorized shares - 40,000 Issued shares – 9,233 shares at June 30, 2005 and 9,205 at December 31, 2004		92			92
Additional paid-in capital		37,377			37,329
Retained deficit		(16,232	)		(15,321	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		397			485
Total shareholders’ equity		21,634			22,585
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	66,731		$	80,353

Note: The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2004, has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

ROCKFORD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share data)

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net sales	$	39,623		$	52,754		$	81,190		$	91,476
Cost of goods sold		27,169			38,500			56,708			69,615
Gross profit		12,454			14,254			24,482			21,861
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		6,770			8,932			13,181			16,216
General and administrative		4,134			4,398			8,679			8,972
Research and development		976			2,162			1,895			4,623
Total operating expenses		11,880			15,492			23,755			29,811
Operating income (loss)		574			(1,238	)		727			(7,950	)
Interest and other expense, net		875			1,101			1,620			1,693
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes		(301	)		(2,339	)		(893	)		(9,643	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		2			(520	)		18			(3,358	)
Loss from continuing operations		(303	)		(1,819	)		(911	)		(6,285	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		—			(643	)		—			(1,580	)
Net loss	$	(303	)	$	(2,462	)	$	(911	)	$	(7,865	)
Net loss per common share:
Loss from continuing operations
Basic	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.70	)
Diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.70	)
Loss from discontinued operations
Basic	$	0.00		$	(0.07	)	$	0.00		$	(0.17	)
Diluted	$	0.00		$	(0.07	)	$	0.00		$	(0.17	)
Net loss
Basic	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.27	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.87	)
Diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.27	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.87	)
Weighted average shares:
Basic		9,233			9,026			9,233			9,020
Diluted		9,233			9,026			9,233			9,020

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

ROCKFORD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)

	Six months ended June 30,
	2005			2004
Cash flow from continuing operating activities:
Net loss from continuing operations	$	(911	)	$	(6,285	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss from continuing operations to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		2,330			2,319
Gain on sale of property and equipment		(26	)		—
Provision for doubtful accounts		380			472
Provision for inventory		409			461
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		3,404			(11,853	)
Inventories		7,683			(13,384	)
Prepaid expenses and other		(139	)		(1,942	)
Bank overdraft		—			635
Accounts payable		(6,716	)		18,419
Accrued salaries and incentives		534			236
Accrued warranty		128			1,044
Income taxes payable (receivable)		38			(1,936	)
Other accrued expenses		(2,135	)		2,816
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		4,979			(8,999	)
Cash flow from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(388	)		(2,444	)
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment		104			(4	)
Increase in other assets		(81	)		(2,588	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(365	)		(5,036	)
Cash flow from financing activities:
Net proceeds from (payments on) notes payable and long-term debt		(4,574	)		19,183
Payment of short term debt		—			(4,000	)
Payments on capital lease obligations		—			(1,408	)
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan		48			—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		—			60
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(4,526	)		13,835
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(88	)		(275	)
Net decrease in cash flow from continuing operations		—			(475	)
Net decrease in cash flow from discontinued operations		—			(241	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		—			716
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	—		$	—

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Rockford Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

June 30, 2005

1. Basis of Presentation

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

     Rockford Corporation and subsidiaries (“Rockford”) has prepared its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, Rockford has made all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation.

     Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, are not necessarily indicative of the results you may expect for the year ending December 31, 2005. Certain reclassifications have been made to the June 30, 2004 interim financial statements in order to conform to the June 30, 2005 presentation.

     For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes included as part of Rockford’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on April 15, 2005.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

     The components of comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30						June 30
	2005			2004			2005			2004
	(In thousands, except per						(In thousands, except per
	share data)						share data)
Net loss	$	(303	)	$	(2,462	)	$	(911	)	$	(7,865	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(25	)		(48	)		(88	)		(440	)
Total comprehensive loss	$	(328	)	$	(2,510	)	$	(999	)	$	(8,305	)

Stock-based Compensation

     Rockford grants stock options for a fixed number of shares to employees with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the shares at date of grant. Fair market value of the underlying shares is determined by the market price at the date of the grant. Rockford accounts for stock options using the intrinsic value method, in accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. Rockford has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and accordingly, recognizes no compensation expense for the employee stock option grants. Stock option grants to non-employees are charged to expense based upon the fair value of the options granted.

  New Accounting Standards

     In December 2004 the FASB issued, and in April 2005 amended, Statement No. 123 (FAS 123R),“Share-Based Payment,”effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. FAS 123R supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,”and will require companies to recognize compensation expense, using a fair-value based method, for costs related to share-based payments including stock options and stock issued under employee stock purchase plans. Rockford will be required to implement FAS 123R no later than the quarter that begins January 1, 2006. Rockford’s adoption will be applied on a modified prospective basis and measured and recognized on January 1, 2006. Rockford is currently evaluating option valuation methodologies and assumptions in light of FAS 123R, and therefore cannot estimate the impact of Rockford’s adoption of FAS 123R at this time. These methodologies and assumptions may be different than those currently employed by Rockford in applying FAS 123.

     The following table represents the effect on net income (loss) and income (loss) per share if Rockford had applied the fair value based method and recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation:

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30						June 30
	2005			2004			2005			2004
	(In thousands, except per share						(In thousands, except per share
	data)						data)
Net loss as reported	$	(303	)	$	(2,462	)	$	(911	)	$	(7,865	)
Proforma SFAS No. 123 expense		(62	)		(77	)		(124	)		(184	)
Proforma net loss	$	(365	)	$	(2,539	)	$	(1,035	)	$	(8,049	)
Proforma loss per common share:
Basic	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.28	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.89	)
Diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.28	)	$	(0.11	)		(0.89	)

     For purposes of proforma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the option’s vesting period.

2. Discontinued Operations

     SimpleDevices, Inc.Rockford sold its majority interest in SimpleDevices, Inc. to Universal Electronics Inc. in October of 2004 for $7.8 million. At closing, Rockford received approximately $6.4 million which was used to pay down Rockford’s senior credit facility. The remaining proceeds of approximately $1.2 million, net of $0.2 million of fees, were placed into an escrow account that will be used to pay claims, if any, of Universal relating to the representations made in the Stock Purchase Agreement. No claims were made as of April 1, 2005, and one-third of the escrow amount was released to Rockford in April 2005. If there are no claims before October 1, 2006, the rest of the escrow amount will be released in October 2006. The amount held in escrow is recorded as a note receivable at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004. As a result of the October 2004 sale, Rockford has treated the SimpleDevices operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

     The following represents the results of operations for Simple Devices, Inc. for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and are reported on Rockford’s statements of operations as results from discontinued operations:

	Three months			Six months
	ended			ended
	June 30			June 30
	2004			2004
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Revenues	$	20		$	172
Cost of sales		78			156
Operating expenses		280			609
Minority interest		(96	)		(257	)
Net loss	$	(242	)	$	(336	)

     MB Quart.Rockford placed its MB Quart GmbH subsidiary into receivership under German law in September of 2004. By instituting the receivership, Rockford relinquished any future benefit from the assets of this subsidiary. As a result, Rockford has treated the MB Quart GmbH operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

     The following represents the results of operations for MB Quart GmbH for the periods presented and are reported on Rockford’s statements of operations as results from discontinued operations:

	Three months			Six months
	ended			ended
	June 30			June 30
	2004			2004
	(In thousands, except per share data)
Revenues	$	1,912		$	3,208
Cost of sales		1,166			2,034
Operating expenses		1,163			2,427
Interest and other income, net		(16	)		(3	)
Income tax benefit		—			(6	)
Net loss	$	(401	)	$	(1,244	)

3. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

	June 30,		December 31,
	2005		2004
	(In thousands)
Raw materials	$	6,238	$	8,269
Work-in-progress		1,820		1,796
Finished goods		17,856		23,940
	$	25,914	$	34,005

4. Net Loss Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share:

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30						June 30
	2005			2004			2005			2004
	(In thousands, except per share						(In thousands, except per share
	data)						data)
Numerator:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(303	)	$	(1,819	)	$	(911	)	$	(6,285	)
Loss from discontinuing operations		—			(643	)		—			(1,580	)
Net loss	$	(303	)	$	(2,462	)	$	(911	)	$	(7,865	)
Denominator:
Denominator for basic net loss per share		9,233			9,026			9,233			9,020
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options		—			—			—			—
Warrants		—			—			—			—
Dilutive potential common shares		—			—			—			—
Denominator for diluted net loss per share		9,233			9,026			9,233			9,020
Loss per common share:
Loss from continuing operations
Basic	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.70	)
Diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.70	)
Loss from discontinued operations
Basic	$	0.00		$	(0.07	)	$	0.00		$	(0.17	)
Diluted	$	0.00		$	(0.07	)	$	0.00		$	(0.17	)
Net loss
Basic	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.27	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.87	)
Diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.27	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.87	)

     There were 425,051 and 65,751 employee stock options not included in the diluted loss per share calculation for June 30, 2004 and 2005, respectively, as they were not dilutive. As of June 30, 2005 Rockford also has $12.5 million of 4.5% convertible senior subordinated secured notes due 2009 and warrants to purchase 1,246,573 shares of common stock at $3.73 per share. The noteholders may convert the notes into Rockford common stock at any time before the scheduled maturity date of June 10, 2009 and Rockford has the right to force conversion of the notes before maturity under certain circumstances. The conversion price at June 30, 2005, was $4.61 per share. If fully converted, the notes are scheduled to convert into 2,711,497 shares of Rockford’s common stock. The convertible senior subordinated secured notes and warrants were not included in the diluted loss per share calculation for June 30, 2005 and 2004, as they were not dilutive.

5. Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt

     Rockford entered into a 3-year asset-based credit facility with Congress Financial Corporation (Western) as Agent and Wachovia Bank, National Association as Arranger on March 29, 2004 and as amended on June 10, 2004 and December 30, 2004. This credit facility, as amended, is collateralized by substantially all of Rockford’s assets and has a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 450 basis points or Prime plus 200 basis points. The balance on the facility and interest rate were $12.5 million and 8% per annum, respectively, at June 30, 2005. At June 30, 2005, Rockford was in compliance with all applicable covenants.

     The credit facility requires that Rockford maintain blocked lock box accounts, whereby Congress takes possession of all cash receipts on a daily basis and these amounts are applied to reduce Rockford’s outstanding debt. In accordance with EITF 95-22:Balance Sheet Classification of Borrowings Outstanding under Revolving Credit Agreements That Include both a Subjective Acceleration Clause and a Lock-Box Arrangement, Rockford has recorded the $12.5 million and $15.5 million outstanding balance as at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 respectively, on the Congress credit facility as short-term. Rockford expects to maintain the facility for the entire three-year term.

     Rockford closed agreements for the private placement of $12.5 million of 4.5% convertible senior subordinated secured notes due 2009 and warrants to purchase 1,246,573 shares of common stock at $3.73 per share on June 10, 2004 and as amended on November 12, 2004. The net proceeds of approximately $12.5 million are allocated between the warrants and the notes based on their relative fair values. The value of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The carrying value of the notes is being accreted ratably, over the term of the notes, to the $12.5 million amount due at maturity. The carrying value of the notes approximated their fair values as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004. Debt issuance costs totaling $0.9 million were capitalized and are being amortized over the life of the notes. The noteholders may convert the notes into Rockford’s common stock at any time before the scheduled maturity date of June 10, 2009. The conversion price is $4.61 per share. If fully converted, the notes will convert into 2,711,497 shares of Rockford’s common stock. Rockford has the right automatically to convert the notes into common stock if the common stock trades above a specified target price for a specified period. Rockford may also force the exercise of the warrants under certain circumstances prior to their expiration date. The noteholders also have a second priority lien on certain Rockford assets. Due to the modification of the convertible notes and warrants on November 12, 2004, Rockford has remeasured the value of the warrants.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Continuing Operations

     This discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of continuing operations should be read in conjunction with Rockford’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures included elsewhere in this report, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Continuing Operations included as part of Rockford’s Form 10-K for the year 2004, filed with the SEC on April 15, 2005.

Overview

     Rockford believes that the strategic realignment it announced in September 2004, the investments it made in new products, distribution channels and technologies during 2004 and 2005, and improvements it is implementing in its processes, have positioned Rockford for improved financial performance in 2005. The strategic realignment has re-focused Rockford on its core mobile audio business and is likely to involve the divestiture of its remaining non-core businesses (in addition to the divestitures Rockford has already announced). Rockford engaged an investment banker in January 2005 to assess strategic alternatives for its primary non-core business, the home and professional audio business that includes the NHT, Fosgate Audionics, and Hafler brands. There were no outstanding liabilities at June 30, 2005 associated with Rockford’s strategic realignment.

     Rockford’s results in the first six months of 2005 were substantially improved compared to the first six months of 2004. The more modest new product introductions for 2005 were completed on schedule, production issues were not a significant factor in Rockford’s performance, and the reduced expense levels resulting from the realignments undertaken during the later part of 2004 all contributed to positive operating income and a reduction in net loss for the six months ended June 30, from $(0.87) per share in 2004 to $(0.10) per share in 2005. Net sales for the first six months of 2005 decreased compared to the first six months of 2004 by $10.3 million, or 11.2% primarily due to lower sales of Rockford Fosgate branded products, including the substantial elimination of sales of Rockford’s lower margin source unit business, and elimination of most sales of the discontinued MB Quart branded products. These reductions were partially offset by increases in OEM sales.

     Rockford’s 2004 product launches had a significant negative impact on Rockford’s results for the first six months of 2004. End of life discounting of 2003 product was greater than usual in the first six months of 2004 due to the extent of the product line overhaul. Discounting and production issues resulting from delays in development and production of the new products resulted in unfavorable manufacturing variances and product shortages which negatively impacted gross margins in the first half of 2004. Rockford also experienced increased engineering costs and premium freight charges associated with the delayed production of these new products.

     Rockford continues to expect a shift in its sales mix into different distribution channels, with the independent specialty dealer and audio/video retailer channels seeing declines in sales and the mass merchant retailers and the OEM channels seeing growth in sales. This shift has had and will continue to have some positive effects, including expansion of Rockford’s product exposure beyond its traditional target market and smoothing out of sales seasonality. At the same time, the different demands of the larger merchants continue to require greater working capital compared to the working capital required for smaller merchants.

Results of Operations

     The following table shows, for the periods indicated, selected consolidated statements of operations data expressed as a percentage of net sales:

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	June 30						June 30
	2005			2004			2005			2004
	(In thousands, except per share						(In thousands, except per share
	data)						data)
Net sales		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of goods sold		68.6			73.0			69.8			76.1
Gross profit		31.4			27.0			30.2			23.9
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		17.1			16.9			16.2			17.7
General and administrative		10.4			8.3			10.8			9.8
Research and development		2.5			4.1			2.3			5.1
Total operating expenses		30.0			29.3			29.3			32.6
Operating income (loss)		1.4			(2.3	)		0.9			(8.7	)
Interest and other expense, net		2.2			2.1			2.0			1.9
Loss from continuing operations before income tax		(0.8	)		(4.4	)		(1.1	)		(10.6	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		0.0			(1.0	)		0.0			(3.7	)
Loss from continuing operations		(0.8	)		(3.4	)		(1.1	)		(6.9	)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes		0.0			(1.2	)		0.0			(1.7	)
Net loss		(0.8	)%		(4.6	)%		(1.1	)%		(8.6	)%

     Cost of goods sold primarily consists of raw materials, direct labor and manufacturing costs associated with production of products as well as warranty, warehousing and customer service expenses.

     Sales and marketing expenses primarily consist of salaries, sales commissions and costs of advertising, trade shows, distributor and sales representative conferences and outbound freight.

     General and administrative expenses primarily consist of salaries, facilities and other costs of accounting, finance, management information systems, administrative and executive departments, as well as legal, accounting and other professional fees and expenses associated with Rockford’s business.

     Research and development expenses primarily consist of salaries associated with research and development personnel and legal costs related to Rockford’s intellectual property.

Geographic Distribution of Sales

     Sales by geographic region were as follows:

	Three months ended				Six months ended
	June 30				June 30
	2005		2004		2005		2004
	(In thousands, except per				(In thousands, except per
	share data)				share data)
Region:(1)
United States	$	32,961	$	44,858	$	67,638	$	78,589
Other Americas		2,945		3,345		5,640		4,551
Europe		2,604		2,831		5,401		5,646
Asia		1,113		1,720		2,511		2,690
Total sales	$	39,623	$	52,754	$	81,190	$	91,476

(1) Sales are attributed to geographic regions based on the location of customers. No single foreign country accounted for greater than 10% of sales.

In the following discussion, certain increases or decreases may differ due to rounding

Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2004

     Net Sales. Net sales decreased by $ 13.1 million, or 24.9%, to $39.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, from $52.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease in sales was primarily attributable to lower sales of the Rockford Fosgate branded product line (including elimination of most sales of source units) and elimination of sales of the discontinued domestic MB Quart line of products. These decreases were partially offset by increases in OEM sales and by lower sales discounts. Net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2004 were positively impacted by initial shipments of the new Rockford Fosgate line of products that were delayed in the first quarter of 2004 and for which second quarter sales included some catch-up sales for sales lost during the first quarter of 2004.

     U.S. sales decreased by $11.9 million, or 26.5%, to $33.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, from $44.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. International sales decreased by $1.2 million, or 15.6%, to $6.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, from $7.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease in international sales was primarily due to lower sales of the Rockford Fosgate and Lighting Audio product lines.

     Gross Profit. Gross Profit decreased by $1.8 million, or 12.6%, to $12.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, from $14.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. As a percent of sales, gross profit increased to 31.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2005, from 27.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2004. This increase as a percent of sales was primarily due to costs incurred in 2004 associated with the production delays, manufacturing and engineering costs, and premium freight to expedite production of the new 2004 products whose introduction was delayed into the second quarter of 2004.

     Sales and Marketing Expenses.Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $2.2 million, or 24.2%, to $6.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 from $8.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. As a percent of sales, sales and marketing expenses increased to 17.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2005 from 16.9% for 2004. The decrease in expenses was primarily due to lower sales commissions, outbound freight and promotional activities. The increase as a percent of sales was because the decrease in expenses was not fully proportional to the decrease in sales for the quarter.

     General and Administrative Expenses.General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.3 million or 6.0%, to $4.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 from $4.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. As a percent of sales, general and administrative expenses increased to 10.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2005 from 8.3% for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to lower information systems and personnel related expenses partially offset by higher professional fees.

     Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses decreased by $1.2 million, or 54.9% to $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, from $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. As a percent of sales, these expenses decreased to 2.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2005, from 4.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease is primarily due to costs incurred in the second quarter of 2004 related to the delayed new product launch that were not repeated in 2005.

     Operating Income (Loss). Operating income (loss) improved by $1.8 million, or 146.4%, to a $0.6 million operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 from a $1.2 million loss for the three months ended June 30, 2004. As a percent of sales, operating income (loss) improved to a 1.4% operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2005, from a 2.3% operating loss for the three months ended June 30, 2004. This improvement in operating income is the result of lower operating expenses described above.

     Interest and Other Expense, Net. Interest and other expense, net, primarily consists of interest expense and currency gains and losses. Interest and other expense, net, decreased by $0.2 million, or 20.5%, to $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 from $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease is primarily attributable to deferred financing fees being written-off in 2004 partially offset by higher interest expense in 2005 due to higher interest rates.

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense.Income tax (benefit) expense increased by $0.5 million, or 100.4%, to a $2,000 expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005, from a $0.5 million benefit for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The effective income tax rates were an expense of 0.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2005, and a benefit of 22.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The change in rate was primarily a result of not recording any tax benefit on losses in the second quarter of 2005.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004

     Net Sales. Net sales decreased by $10.3 million, or 11.2%, to $81.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from $91.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease in sales was primarily attributable to lower sales of Rockford Fosgate brand products (including the elimination of most sale of source units, a low margin item) and the elimination of sale of the discontinued domestic MB Quart line of products. These decreases were partially offset by increases in OEM sales and lower sales discounts. Net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2004 were positively impacted by initial shipments of the new Rockford Fosgate line of products that were delayed in the first quarter of 2004 and for which second quarter sales included some catch-up sales for sales lost during the first quarter of 2004.

     U.S. sales decreased by $11.0 million, or 13.9%, to $67.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from $78.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. International sales increased by $0.7 million, or 5.2%, to $13.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from $12.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The increase in international sales was primarily because 2005 sales were not affected by the product availability shortfall that impacted sales in the first half of 2004. The 2004 shortfall occurred because of the delays in 2004 new product introductions and the allocation of limited inventory to the U.S. market until there was adequate inventory to meet demand.

     Gross Profit. Gross Profit increased by $2.6 million, or 12.0%, to $24.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from $21.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. As a percent of sales, gross profit increased to 30.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from 23.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2004. This increase was primarily due to reduced sales and increased costs incurred in 2004 associated with the production delays, manufacturing and engineering costs, and premium freight to expedite production of the new 2004 products whose introduction was delayed during the first half of 2004.

     Sales and Marketing Expenses.Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $3.0 million, or 18.7%, to $13.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 from $16.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. As a percent of sales, sales and marketing expenses decreased to 16.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 from 17.7% for 2004. The decrease was primarily due to lower sales commissions, outbound freight, sales and marketing personnel related expenses and reduced promotional activities.

     General and Administrative Expenses.General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.3 million or 3.3%, to 8.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 from $9.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. As a percent of sales, general and administrative expenses increased to 10.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 from 9.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease in general and administrative expenses is primarily due to lower information systems and personnel related expenses partially offset by higher professional fees.

     Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses decreased by $2.7 million, or 59.0% to $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from $4.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. As a percent of sales, these expenses decreased to 2.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from 5.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease is primarily due to costs incurred in the first half of 2004 related to the delayed new product launch that were not repeated in 2005.

     Operating Income (Loss). Operating income (loss) improved by $8.7 million, or 109.1%, to a $0.7 million operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 from a $8.0 million loss for the six months ended June 30, 2004. As a percent of sales, operating income (loss) improved to a 0.9% operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from an 8.7% operating loss for the six months ended June 30, 2004. This improvement in operating income is the result of the increase in gross profit and lower operating expenses described above.

     Interest and Other Expense, Net. Interest and other expense, net, primarily consists of interest expense and currency gains and losses. Interest and other expense, net, decreased by $0.1 million, or 4.3%, to $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 from $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease is primarily attributable to deferred financing fees being written-off in 2004 partially offset by higher interest expense in 2005 due to higher interest rates.

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense.Income tax (benefit) expense increased by $3.4 million, or 100.5%, to a $18,000 expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005, from a $3.4 million benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The effective income tax rates were an expense of 2.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2005, and a benefit of 34.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The change in rate was primarily a result of not recording any tax benefit on losses in the first half of 2005.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     Rockford has financed its business primarily using existing capital, cash flows from operations, if any, proceeds from its private placement of convertible notes, and bank borrowings. Rockford’s cash flow from operations was $5.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to $9.0 million of cash flow used in operations for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The reductions in accounts receivables and inventory were the primary source of cash for Rockford during the first six months of 2005. The reductions in accounts payable accounts and other accrued expenses were the primary use of cash during the first six months of 2005.

     Rockford entered into a 3-year asset-based credit facility with Congress Financial Corporation (Western), as Agent, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Arranger, on March 29, 2004 and as amended on June 10, 2004 and December 30, 2004. This credit facility is collateralized by substantially all of Rockford’s assets and has a variable interest rate of LIBOR plus 450 basis points or Prime plus 200 basis points. Rockford’s balance on the Congress facility was $12.5 million as of June 30, 2005.

     Rockford closed agreements for the private placement of $12.5 million of 4.5% convertible senior subordinated secured notes due 2009 and warrants to purchase 1,246,573 shares of common stock at $3.73 per share on June 10, 2004 and as amended on November 12, 2004. The net proceeds of approximately $12.5 million are allocated between the warrants and the notes based on their relative fair values. The value of the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The carrying value of the notes is being accreted ratably, over the term of the notes, to the $12.5 million amount due at maturity. The carrying value of the notes approximated their fair values as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004. Debt issuance costs totaling $0.9 million were capitalized and are being amortized over the life of the notes. The noteholders may convert the notes into Rockford’s common stock at any time before the scheduled maturity date of June 10, 2009. The conversion price is $4.61 per share. If fully converted, the notes will convert into 2,711,497 shares of Rockford’s common stock. Rockford has the right automatically to convert the notes into common stock if the common stock trades above a specified target price for a specified period. Rockford may also force the exercise of the warrants under certain circumstances prior to their expiration date. The noteholders have a second priority lien on certain Rockford asset. Due to the modification of the Convertible notes and Warrants on November 12, 2004, Rockford has remeasured the value of the Warrants.

     Rockford anticipates, based on its cash flow forecast, that cash flow from operations at the expected level of operations for 2005 and 2006 and available borrowings under its credit facility will be adequate to meet Rockford’s requirements for current capital expenditures, working capital and interest payments for the next twelve months. Rockford anticipates that its operations will significantly improve compared to its operations during 2004, so that its cash requirements in 2005 and 2006 will be less than its cash requirements in 2004. Rockford has not budgeted for proceeds from non-core asset sales resulting from its strategic realignment, so that if received such proceeds would supplement Rockford’s cash resources.

     If Rockford’s operations fail to improve, or if Rockford is otherwise unable to satisfy its liquidity needs as anticipated, it could be forced to seek one or more financing alternatives. These alternatives could include reducing or delaying capital expenditures, borrowing additional funds, restructuring indebtedness, selling additional assets, reducing expenditures for new product development, and cutting other costs. Some of these alternatives might not prove to be available on acceptable terms; others may substantially interfere with Rockford’s business and prospects. Rockford cannot give assurance that satisfactory actions could be put into effect on reasonable terms. If it needs to take some or all of these actions, but is not able to do so, Rockford may not be able to satisfy its liquidity needs. Under such circumstances, Rockford might not be able to continue its business as currently anticipated.

     Rockford had working capital of $26.3 million at June 30, 2005, compared to $25.3 million at December 31, 2004. The significant components of working capital at June 30, 2005 include:

• Rockford had no cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004. Due to the daily sweep of cash by Congress, described below, Rockford has reclassified cash and cash equivalents to net against its current debt balance.

• Rockford’s net accounts receivable were $29.4 million at June 30, 2005 compared to $33.2 million at December 31, 2004. The decrease in accounts receivable balances is primarily due to lower sales, more favorable terms and improved collection activities.

• Rockford’s inventory position decreased from $34.0 million at the end of 2004 to $25.9 million at June 30, 2005. This inventory decrease was due to improved inventory turns and the reduction of excess and obsolete inventory

• Accounts payable decreased $6.7 million, from $15.6 million at December 31, 2004 to $8.9 million at June 30, 2005. This decrease was primarily due to reestablishing normalized vendor payment terms compared to the extended vendor payment terms experienced at December 31, 2004.

     The Congress credit facility requires that Rockford maintain blocked lock box accounts, whereby Congress takes possession of all cash receipts on a daily basis and these amounts are applied to reduce Rockford’s outstanding debt. In accordance with EITF 95-22:Balance Sheet Classification of Borrowings Outstanding under Revolving Credit Agreements That Include both a Subjective Acceleration Clause and a Lock-Box Arrangement, Rockford has recorded the $12.5 million and $15.5 million outstanding balance as at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, on the Congress credit facility as short-term. Rockford expects to maintain the facility for the entire three-year term.

     Investing activities used cash of $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 versus a use of $5.0 million cash for the six months ended June 30, 2004. This reduction in spending is primarily due to higher capital expenditures in the first six months of 2004 due to the launch of the new Rockford Fosgate product line that were not repeated in 2005. Capital expenditures, the primary use of cash from investing activities, were $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 versus $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Rockford continues to work to improve management of its capital spending and has imposed increased payback requirements for approval of capital spending. Rockford’s capital spending is primarily in tooling for specific product lines, general machinery and equipment to support manufacturing and computer hardware and software to support operations. Rockford does not anticipate significant changes in its future capital spending requirements, other than reductions resulting from its divestiture of non-core businesses and elimination of the capital spending required for those businesses. As of June 30, 2005, Rockford was not involved in any unconsolidated VIE transactions.

Contractual Obligations as of June 30, 2005

Rockford had certain cash obligations at June 30, 2005 due as follows (dollars in thousands)

	Payments due by period
			Less than						More than
Contractual Obligations	Total		1 year		1-3 years		3-5 years		5 years
Current portion of long-term debt	$	15,358	$	2,073	$	13,285		—		—
Long term notes payable	$	14,752	$	563	$	1,125	$	13,063		—
Operating Leases	$	5,910	$	2,089	$	3,780	$	41		—

There have not been material changes in Rockford’s Operating Leases since December 31, 2004.

     Rockford did not have any material outstanding noncancelable purchase obligations at June 30, 2005. Several of its sourcing agreements require Rockford to place monthly purchase orders, but do not require a minimum purchase quantity or dollar amount. Rockford does not anticipate significant liability in connection with these contractual requirements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

     The methods, estimates and judgments Rockford uses in applying its accounting policies have a significant impact on the results reported in its consolidated financial statements. Rockford evaluates its estimates and judgments on an on-going basis. Rockford bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions that Rockford believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Rockford’s experience and assumptions form the basis for its judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may vary from what Rockford anticipates and different assumptions or estimates about the future could change its reported results. Rockford believes the following accounting policies are the most critical to Rockford, in that they are important to the portrayal of Rockford’s financial statements and they require Rockford’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements:

     Revenue Recognition.Rockford recognizes revenue pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin Nos. 101 and 104,Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.Accordingly, Rockford recognizes revenue and records sales, net of related discounts, when all of the following criteria are met:

• Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

• The price to the customer is fixed or determinable; and

• Collectibility is reasonably assured.

     Rockford sells almost all of its products F.O.B. place of shipment, so that upon shipment of products, the above criteria are met and revenue is recognized.

     Rockford also records reductions to revenue for estimated customer returns and additional sales incentive offerings, such as growth and volume incentive rebates and prompt pay discounts, based on historical rates. Should a greater proportion of customers return product or redeem incentives than estimated, Rockford may need to make additional reductions to revenue.

     Intangible Assets.On January 1, 2002, Rockford adopted SFAS No. 141,Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.When Rockford accounts for acquired businesses as purchases, it allocates purchase prices to the assets, definite-lived intangible assets, and liabilities acquired based on the estimated fair values on the respective acquisition dates. Based on these values, Rockford allocates any excess purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired to goodwill. As at June 30, 2005, Rockford has written off all remaining goodwill because of its impairment as outlined in the notes to Rockford’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004.

     Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.Rockford maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts, based on historical rates, for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The assessment of customers’ ability to pay generally includes direct contact with the customer, investigation into customers’ financial status, as well as consideration of customers’ payment history. If the financial condition of Rockford’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, Rockford might need to make additional allowances.

     Inventory.Rockford carries inventory at the lower of cost or market, computed using the weighted average method. For purposes of the lower of cost or market calculations, Rockford writes down obsolete or unmarketable inventory in amounts equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Rockford reviews information such as quantity on hand versus forecasted use and inventory aging listings to assist in this assessment. If actual future demand or market conditions are less favorable than projected, Rockford may need to take additional inventory write-downs. Any write-downs are reflected in cost of sales in the period incurred.

     Warranty.Rockford maintains a warranty reserve, based on historical rates, for costs associated with the repair or replacement of product that fails to meet its standard warranty against defects in material and workmanship. Should actual product failure rates differ from its estimates, Rockford would need to make revisions to its estimated accruals.

     Income Taxes.Rockford must make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes. Rockford must assess the likelihood that it will be able to recover Rockford’s deferred tax assets. If recovery is not likely, Rockford must increase its provision, or decrease its benefit, by recording a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets that Rockford estimates will not ultimately be recoverable. Based on Rockford’s review of its deferred tax assets in connection with its realignment announced in September 2004 and at December 31, 2004, it determined that a valuation allowance in the amount of $14.4 million was required and has reserved against substantially all of its deferred tax assets.

     Inflation.Inflation has not had a significant impact on Rockford’s operations since it operates in a market that requires continuing price decreases and Rockford has historically been able to insist on continuing price decreases from its suppliers. Rising metal prices and increasing transportation costs may have an impact on Rockford’s operations in 2005, if Rockford is not able to secure concessions from its suppliers. Rockford sources a significant portion of its products and parts from China. Although most of its purchases from China are priced in dollars, the suppliers’ ability to maintain or reduce current prices may be affected by the recent change in China’s exchange rate policy.

  New Accounting Standards

     In December 2004 the FASB issued, and in April 2005 amended, Statement No. 123 (FAS 123R),“Share-Based Payment,”effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. FAS 123R supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,”and will require companies to recognize compensation expense, using a fair-value based method, for costs related to share-based payments including stock options and stock issued under employee stock purchase plans. Rockford will be required to implement FAS 123R no later than the quarter that begins January 1, 2006. Rockford’s adoption will be applied on a modified prospective basis and measured and recognized on January 1, 2006. Rockford is currently evaluating option valuation methodologies and assumptions in light of FAS 123R, and therefore cannot estimate the impact of Rockford’s adoption of FAS 123R at this time. These methodologies and assumptions may be different than those currently employed by Rockford in applying FAS 123, outlined in note 1 to Rockford’s financial statements.

     In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB 43, Chapter 4.SFAS No. 151 will require that abnormal amounts of idle capacity and spoilage costs be excluded from the cost of inventory and expensed when incurred. This standard also provides guidance for the allocation of fixed production overhead costs. This standard is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Rockford will adopt this standard in fiscal 2006. Rockford has not yet determined the impact, if any, this Statement will have on Rockford’s financial statements.

     In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 153,Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets, an amendment of APB No. 29, Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions.SFAS 153 requires exchanges of productive assets to be accounted for at fair value, rather than at carryover basis, unless (1) neither the asset received nor the asset surrendered has a fair value that is determinable within reasonable limits or (2) the transactions lack commercial substance. SFAS 153 is effective for non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Rockford does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

     Rockford’s primary market risk exposures are in the areas of interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk. Its holdings of cash equivalents are subject to interest rate fluctuations, but Rockford believes this risk is immaterial due to the short-term nature of these investments and the essentially zero cash balances it carries. The outstanding balances on its credit facilities are also subject to interest rate fluctuations.

     The value of the U.S. dollar affects Rockford’s financial results. Changes in exchange rates may positively or negatively affect revenues, gross margins, operating expenses and shareholders’ equity as expressed in U.S. dollars. Historically, Rockford’s exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations were modest because it sold its products primarily in U.S. dollars and held only a small percentage of its assets outside the U.S. However, Rockford conducts a growing portion of its business in foreign currencies and it is increasing its billings in local currencies in Canada and Europe.

     In recent years, Rockford has sourced an increasing percentage of its products, or of raw materials and parts for its products, from outside the United States. Most of these raw materials and parts are sourced in Asia, principally in China. Although most of these purchases are denominated in dollars, an extended decline in the value of the dollar may affect the terms and prices on which Rockford is able to purchase from its foreign suppliers and may, therefore, increase Rockford’s costs. The recent change in the Chinese government’s exchange rate policies may have increased the risk of adverse changes in the dollar/renminbi exchange rate.

     At June 30, 2005, Rockford did not have any outstanding forward contracts or other financial hedges against exchange rate risk.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

  Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     Rockford’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over its financial reporting. They have reviewed Rockford’s disclosure controls and procedures during the last 30 days in order to comply with the SEC’s requirements for certification of this Form 10-Q. Rockford is a non-accelerated filer and, accordingly, it is required to comply with the SEC’s enhanced requirements for certification and attestation of internal control over financial reporting for its Form 10-K for its fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.

     Rockford is currently evaluating what changes will be needed to meet the enhanced reporting relating to internal controls required by the Sarbanes Oxley Act and subsequent SEC regulations. Rockford is currently in the process of establishing an enhanced internal control process. There was no change in internal control over financial reporting that occurred in the first half of 2005, and through the date of filing, that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect Rockford’s internal controls over financial reporting other than the correction of the matters discussed below.

     Based on their review of Rockford’s disclosure controls and policies, Rockford’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that its disclosure controls and procedures were deficient as discussed below.

  Material Weaknesses of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     Preparation of Annual Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2004

     Rockford has concluded, in connection with the preparation of its Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2004, that it was subject to a material weakness in its disclosure controls and procedures, in that the internal controls were not sufficient to ensure the information required to be disclosed in Rockford’s reports was accurate and was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the requisite time periods. Deficiencies resulted from substantial management and staff turnover, particularly in the general accounting and finance areas, during the fourth quarter of 2004 and first quarter of 2005. This turnover caused a loss of operations and process knowledge that interfered with the preparation of the Annual Report.

     In connection with the preparation of Rockford’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004, significant internal control deficiencies became evident to management. In the aggregate, a material weakness resulted from control deficiencies that included inadequate staffing and supervision, leading to the untimely identification and resolution of certain accounting matters; failure to perform timely reviews, substantiation and evaluation of certain general ledger account balances; and lack of procedures or expertise needed to prepare all required disclosures. A material weakness is a significant deficiency in one or more of the internal control components that alone or in the aggregate precludes the internal controls from reducing to an appropriate low level the risk that material misstatements in the financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

     Rockford’s registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, advised management and the audit committee of the board of directors that the financial reporting deficiencies described above are considered to be a material weakness in Rockford’s internal controls which constitutes a reportable condition under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The Audit Committee, board of directors, management and Ernst & Young discussed these weaknesses and Rockford assigned the highest priority to their correction.

     Even before the discussion of the material weakness, Rockford was actively seeking to hire appropriate replacement personnel who could restore the required expertise lost as a result of turnover in 2004 and 2005. In 2005, Rockford has added financial resources and expertise, both through internal hiring and using outside consultants, that will provide hands-on oversight of monthly financial closing, data analysis, and account reconciliation. Management and the audit committee are committed to addressing and resolving the weaknesses fully and believe that additional financial resources and expertise will correct the material weakness. Rockford believes that it has hired personnel who will be able to restore the required expertise and that these new personnel, and added oversight of its financial processes, have substantially mitigated this material weakness in connection with the preparation of Rockford’s first and second quarter financial statements. During the second quarter of 2005 the time required for the monthly financial closing process has returned to historical levels, so that Rockford believes that this weakness had been substantially mitigated by the end of that period.

     Accounts Payable Reconciliation for the Year Ended December 31, 2003

     During the first quarter of 2004, Rockford identified a material weakness in procedures for reconciling accounts payable at the end of each reporting period. The material weakness arose as a result of a reconciliation process that failed to reconcile the accounts payable module of Rockford’s Oracle information system, which includes all pending invoices, with the general ledger accounts payable. Before the first quarter of 2004, the reconciliation process for each period focused on the general ledger balances and did not reconcile the general ledger to the Oracle accounts payable module. Timing issues resulting from the approval process for accounts payable caused the general ledger accounts payable not to reflect all of the accounts payable that had been entered into the accounts payable module in Oracle. The reconciliation process did not identify this discrepancy. As a result, the general ledger and financial statements did not reflect all of the accounts payable that the Oracle module showed at the end of each period nor did they reflect certain corresponding assets.

     Rockford reviewed its financial statements for prior periods and believes that the reconciliation failures did not have a material effect on reported earnings in any quarter for the last four fiscal years, going back through fiscal 2000. As a result, Rockford did not restate results for any prior periods. Rockford also concluded that the underlying business processes were properly using the Oracle payables module and that, upon approval through normal business processes, the payables shown in the Oracle payables module were being paid in accordance with their terms and reflected in the general ledger and financial statements.

     For the first quarter of 2004, and going forward, Rockford implemented additional reconciliation procedures to assure that the accounts payable reported on the general ledger reconcile to the information contained in the Oracle accounts payable module for the end of each period reported. As at March 31, 2004, the balance sheet reflected an increase in accounts payable of $4.7 million, an increase in inventory in-transit of $3.7 million, and an increase in other assets or offsets to other accrual accounts of $0.5 million as a result of this reconciliation. The after tax impact on operating results for the quarter was $0.3 million, or $0.03 per share. Rockford believes each of these items reflects a one-time adjustment and that going forward the reconciliation process will not have a material impact on results of operations.

     Rockford’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, advised management and the audit committee of the board of directors that the reconciliation failure described above is considered to be a material weakness in Rockford’s internal controls and constitutes a reportable condition under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The audit committee, board of directors, management and Ernst & Young discussed this weakness. Rockford assigned the highest priority to the correction of this weakness and implemented new reconciliation procedures effective with the first quarter 2004 closing.. Rockford believes the weakness resulted from a failure to identify and fully understand the interaction between different parts of the Oracle information system, rather than from a failure in the ability or intent of Rockford’s personnel, and believes the changes in the reconciliation process have corrected this weakness.

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

     Since the date of Rockford’s Annual Report for the year 2004, filed with the SEC on April 15, 2005, there have been no additional material developments in connection with the patent claim described in the Legal Proceedings section of the Annual Report.

     Rockford has secured a final judgment in the amount of approximately $1.5 million against its former Panamanian distributor in the action described in the Annual Report, and the time for appeal has expired. Rockford is now in the process of seeking to collect on the judgment. Because the former distributor’s assets are primarily in Panama, Rockford is not certain what amount it is likely to recover, if any, based on the judgment.

     Rockford is, and may continue to be, a party to various lawsuits and arbitrations from time to time. As at April 15, 2005, Rockford was not a party to any legal proceedings that it believes are material, other than the effect of the expenses associated with the lawsuits described in the Annual Report.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

(a)	Rockford’s annual meeting of shareholders was held on May 11, 2005.
(b)	At the annual meeting, the Rockford’s shareholders re-elected all six Directors for a one-year term which expires at the annual shareholders meeting in 2006.
(c)	At the annual meeting, Rockford’s shareholders ratified the appointment of Ernst & Young L.L.P. as Rockford’s auditors for 2005. The holders of 8,792,517 common shares voted to ratify the appointment, the holders of 4,375 common shares voted against the ratification, and the holders of 1,100 common shares abstained.
	The following tabulation represents voting for the Directors

Name	Votes For		Withheld Authority
W. Gary Suttle		8,673,334		124,658
Nicholas G. Bartol		8,665,441		132,551
Ralph B. Godfrey		8,764,817		33,175
Jerry E. Goldress		8,764,817		33,175
Timothy C. Bartol		8,161,051		636,941
John P Lloyd		8,686,217		111,775

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits

Exhibit
Number	Description of Document
3.1	Articles of Incorporation+
3.2	Restated Bylaws as amended through July 27, 2000++
3.3	Amendment to Articles of Incorporation filed on January 12, 1988+
3.4	Amendment to Articles of Incorporation filed on May 12, 1999+
3.5	Amendment to Articles of Incorporation filed on May 17, 1999+
3.7	Amendment to Articles of Incorporation filed on July 1, 1999+
4.1	Specimen Common Stock Certificate+
4.2	Reference is made to the Articles of Incorporation, as amended, and the Restated Bylaws, as amended, filed as Exhibits 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 and 3.7 for a description of the rights of the holders of Common Stock.
31.1	Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for W. Gary Suttle
31.2	Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for Richard G. Vasek
32	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
99.9	Risk Factors That May Affect Rockford’s Operating Results, Business Prospects and Stock Price+++

+	Previously filed with our registration statement on Form S-1, which the SEC declared effective on April 19, 2000 and/or amendments
++	Previously filed on August 11, 2000 with our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000.
+++	Previously filed on April 15, 2005, with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

(b) During the period from April 1, 2005, through June 30, 2005, Rockford filed the following reports on Form 8-K.

May 13, 2005 Report disclosing on Item 9 that Rockford had issued a news release regarding Rockford’s results of operations for the 1^st Quarter, ended March 31, 2005. This report furnished a copy of the press release under Item 9 of Form 8-K.

SIGNATURES

     In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	ROCKFORD CORPORATION
Date: July 28, 2005	By:	/s/ Richard G. Vasek
		Richard G. Vasek
		Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer)